Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-02-17 City Council Meeting (Section 1)
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY FEBRUARY 17, 2015 7:00 P.M. 7:00 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL 7:05 p.m. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA A. Resolution No. 2015 -27 Approving Mayor's Appointment Of HRA Commissioners 7:05 p.m. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of February 3, 2015, Work Session Of February 3, 2015 B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 020/5/2015 TOTAL $529,821.05 And Per Pre -List Dated 2/12/2015 TOTAL $1,683,128.78 C. Approve Out -Of -State Travel For City Council Members D. Request For Purchase — 2 2015 Chevrolet Traverses and 1 2015 Chevrolet Impala — Police Department E. Request For Purchase — 1 2015 Jeep Cherokee and 1 2015 Ford Taurus — Police Department F. Request For Purchase — MaxGalaxy Recreation Software — Parks Department G. Request For Purchase — KMC Total Control HVAC Control System, Multiple Sites H. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid Contract ENG 15 -2 West 50th Street Bridge Scour Repairs 1. Resolution No. 2015 -26 Approving No Parking On Valley View Road And Braemar Boulevard J. Traffic Safety Committee Report January 7, 2015 K. Resolution No. 2015 -23 Cooperative Agreement With City of Bloomington For Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project, Improvement No. BA -431 L. Release Of Public Improvements & Special Assessment Agreements M. Request For Purchase —2015 Ford F250 2WD Pickup — Public Works — Utilities N. Request For Purchase — 2015 Vacon Jetter Vac Truck — Public Works — Utilities O. Resolution No. 2015 -24 Initiating Termination Of Water Service Agenda February 17, 2015 Page 2 7:10 p.m. 7:25 p.m. 7:35 p.m. 7:50 p.m. 8:20 p.m. P. Resolution No. 2015 -25 Authorizing MOU Accepting Funding From Department of Justice Funding For Financial Task Force V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Mid- Decade Analysis Of Housing & Population Report - Dick Carlstrom B. Speak Up Edina Presentation — Food To Liquor Ratio C. Braemar Master Plan Update VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the e f j�icient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - 2015 Community Development Block Grant, Resolution No. 2015 -20, (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 8:35 p.m. A. Second Reading — Ordinance No. 2014 -25, Amending Chapters 10 & 32, Regarding Tree Preservation And Subdivisions (Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass.) 8:45 p.m. B. Resolution No. 2015 -21 Lot Division With Variances, 3621 & 3625 54th Street For Donnay Homes 9:00 P.M. C. Request For consideration Of Changes To Plans For A Rezoning Request Denied By City Council For Mathias Mortenson, 3923 49th Street 9:15 p.m. D. Appointments To Advisory Boards And Commissions 9:20 p.m. E. Request For Purchase — Authorize Award Of Bid For Promenade Phase 4, Associated Professional Services And Termination Agreement Agenda February 17, 2015 Page 3 9:35 p.m. F. New Wine On -Sale and 3.2 Liquor Licenses, SNP Enterprises, DBA: The Tin Fish, 6364 John Harris Drive 9:45 p.m. G. New Wine On -Sale and 3.2 Liquor Licenses, Grey Ghost Grub LLC DBA; Hello Pizza, 3904 Sunnyside Road 9:10 P.M. H. Resolution No. 2015 -22 Accepting Various Grants & Donations 9:15 p.m. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Park Board, January 13, 2015 2. Veteran's Memorial Committee, October 31 and December 19, 2014 3. Heritage Preservation Board, January 13, 2015 4. Planning Commission, November 28, 2014 9:20 p.m. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE 9:25 p.m. XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS 9:45 p.m. XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS 9:50 p.m. XIII. ADJOURNMENT Agenda February 17, 2015 Page 4 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 9:50 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 9:50 p.m. II. ROLL CALL 9:50 p.m. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA 9:50 p.m. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA — December 2, 2014 9:55 p.m. V. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — Authorize Award Of Bid For Promenade Phase 4, Associated Professional Services And Termination of Agreement 10:00 P.M. VI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Feb 17 Work Session —joint Meeting W/ Planning Commission & Two -Step 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Redevelopment Process Tues Feb 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Feb 19 Special Meeting With Representative Ellison 1:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 3 Work Session — Liquor Operations Update 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Private Sanitary Sewer 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM State of Utilities 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 17 Work Session — Park Strategic Plan Progress Report 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting With Housing Foundation Affordable Housing Policy 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Mar 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 7 Work Session - City Funding For 66 West 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 21 Work Session — Vision Edina/2016 -17 Proposed Work Plan /Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Apr 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 6 Work Session — Park Strategic Plan Drive 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 19 Work Session — Grandview Development Alternatives 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Agenda Item III.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -27 APPROVING MAYOR'S APPOINTMENT OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: I. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.003, Subdivision 5 and 6, the Mayor has submitted for the City Council's consideration the appointment of the following members to the Authority: Kevin Staunton and Robert Stewart 2. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.003, Subdivision 6, the City Council hereby approves the appointment of two Commissioners of the Authority for terms of such office which coincide with their terms of office as members of the City Council, respectively. 3. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.003, Subdivision 7, the City Clerk (a) shall file the originals of such certificates of appointment in the office of the City Manager and (b) shall file in the office of the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development a certified copy of this Resolution and a certified copy of the above - mentioned certificates of appointment. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 17 day of February, 2015. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk 180338v1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:1 1 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the revised meeting agenda moving Item VIII.G., Resolution No. 2015 -19, Permission to Work in Conservation Easement, Leonard and Missy Blum, 5240 Highwood Drive, Edina, MN, as Item VI.B. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed work session meeting minutes of January 20, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register IV.C. IV.D. IV.E. IV.F. dated January 22, 2015, and consisting of 37 pages; General Fund $440,667.28; Police Special Revenue $13,234.34; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $12,637.99; Working Capital Fund $676,012.02; Golf Dome Fund $6,395.00; Aquatic Center Fund $802.70; Golf Course Fund $9,725.49; Ice Arena Fund $614,642.48; Sports Dome Fund $1,020,416.58; Edinborough Park Fund $17,258.79; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,051.66; Liquor Fund $205,554.56; Utility Fund $437,693.48; Storm Sewer Fund $767.00; PSTF Agency Fund $5,577.34; Centennial TIF District $990.00; Valley View /Wooddale TIF District $5,000.00; Payroll Fund $12,094.90; TOTAL $3,482521.61 and for receipt of payment of claims dated January 29, 2015, and consisting of 27 pages; General Fund $140,630.07; Police Special Revenue $4,264.00; Braemar Memorial Fund $15,000.00; PIR Debt Service Fund $50.88; Working Capital Fund $167,769.14; Equipment Replacement Fund $6,285.00; Art Center Fund $3,851.90; Golf Dome Fund $649.94; Aquatic Center Fund $142.79; Golf Course Fund $101,355.47; Ice Arena Fund $15,002.67; Sports Dome Fund $23,283.10; Edinborough Park Fund $17,942.61; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $34,375.34; Liquor Fund $160,684.08; Utility Fund $26,777.42; PSTF Agency Fund $1,197.55; Centennial TIF District $275.00; Grandview TIF District $15.00; Southdale 2 District $820.00; Payroll Fund $4,1 1 1.26; TOTAL $724,483.22 Request for Purchase, Authorize Engineering Services for the 50th Street and Wooddale Avenue Bridge Repairs, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates, Inc. at $63,800.00 Request for Purchase, 2015 Dodge Grand Caravan — Police Department, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Dodge of Burnsville at $20,416.00 Adopt Resolution No. 2015-16, Approving City of Edina and Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Regional Trailway Cooperative Agreement Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -17, Approving a Resolution of Support for the Acquisition of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2015 W.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -18, Authorizing Joint Powers Agreement with the State of Minnesota replacing Resolution No. 2015 -09 signed January 6, 2015 Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. JAN CALLISON, HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER UPDATE RECEIVED Commissioner Callison presented updates on Hennepin County's levy, regulation of electronic cigarettes, plans for Southdale Service Center, mosquito control, and Heading Home Hennepin. V.B. DANA NELSON, ASSISTANT MANAGER NOISE ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING, METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOISE STUDY PRESENTED Dana Nelson, Assistant Manager Noise Environment and Planning, Metropolitan Airports Commission, presented the Edina and St. Louis Park Noise Monitoring Study including the scope, methodology, results, and conclusions. Ms. Nelson answered questions of the Council, indicating that the study did take into account areas with high complaints in conjunction with actual flight patterns and that the areas chosen for the monitoring equipment had to be secure and had to avoid busy areas. Manager Neal noted that an additional factor was the geographic coverage of the monitors. Ms. Nelson explained that the devices barely overlapped, but did an accurate job measuring the Southeast and Southwest quadrants. Ms. Nelson discussed Day -Night Sound Level (DNL), how it was measured, and eligibility for mitigation confirming that Edina's DNL did not reach the required standards for mitigation. Ms. Nelson also answered questions concerning Area Navigation (RN"), explaining that RNAV was an initiative of the Federal Aviation Administration to update air traffic control systems across the United States. The RNAV procedure for departures was off the table, but the RNAV procedure for arrivals would begin March 5, 2015. The Council asked Ms. Nelson to schedule a less formal meeting in Edina where the community could ask questions and to discover the top ten noise events were related to a specific type of airplane. The Council introduced Commissioners Paul Rehkamp and Lisa Peilen who were in attendance. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -25, AMENDING CHAPTERS 10 AND 32, REGARDING TREES PRESERVATION AND SUBDIVISIONS — FIRST READING GRANTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the revised tree preservation ordinance based on feedback from the October 21, 2014, City Council work session. The ordinance applied to demolition permits; subdivision applications; building permit applications for principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck, or a pool; and, additions to principal and accessory structures. Trees to be protected under the proposed ordinance include all deciduous trees at least eight inches in diameter at breast height (dbh) except box elder, poplar, willow, silver maple, black locust, fruit tree, and mulberry; and coniferous trees at least 20 feet in height. The proposed ordinance would increase the amount of staff time required to enforce the ordinance. As such, the city forester position would increase from a three - fourths position to a full -time position. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to staffing and enforceability. Michael Platteter, Planning Commission Chair, answered questions of the Council, indicating that transplanted trees should count as replacement trees. The Council noted that if the language in the ordinance did not specify, it could be added prior to Second Reading. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:25 p.m. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2015 Public Testimony Heather Beal, 4236 Crocker Avenue, addressed the Council. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council supported rewording Page 4, Section 32 -7. Variances. (3), to read: "That the variance is to correct inequities resulting from an extreme physical hardship including topography or inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems." Member Brindle made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2014 -25, an Ordinance Amendment Regarding Tree Preservation and Subdivisions, as revised. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -19 PERMISSION TO WORK IN CONSERVATION EASEMENT LEONARD AND MISSY BLUM, 5240 HIGHWOOD DRIVE ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request from Missy and Leonard Blum for permission to perform work within a Conservation Easement for the purpose of installing retaining walls and pathway to Mirror Lake within the easement area. Work would include grading, tree removal, tree replanting, and installation of three underground stormwater treatment areas to filter out sediment before draining into Mirror Lake. The applicant would like to tear down the existing home on the property and build a new one outside of the easement area. Mr. Teague presented maps of the area and reviewed the conditions of approval. The Council asked questions relating to the patio and retaining walls encroaching into the conservation easement and the planned height for the retaining walls. John Sonnek, Charles Cudd De Novo LLC, discussed the process of the water retention system explaining that all of the water from the home would be caught by the underground stormwater treatment areas. Mr. Sonnek also reviewed the site plan and landscaping details. The Council asked questions relating to materials for the driveway, hardcover, landscaping plans, and tree replacement. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:02 p.m. Public Testimony Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council. Barbara Schulz, 5240 Highwood Drive West, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council continued discussions of landscaping requirements and tree removal and replacement. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -19, Granting Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2015 Permission to Work within a Conservation Easement at 5240 Highwood Drive for Missy and Leonard Blum subject to the following conditions: I. Submittal of a landscape and tree removal and replacement plan subject to review and approval of the city forester. 2. Trees to be removed in the easement area shall be replaced I for I. Removal and replacement of trees, including size of replacement trees, shall be subject to review and approval by the city forester. 3. The proposed plans require review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 4. Work in the easement must be consistent with the plans date stamped January 28, 2015 and presented to the City Council. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated January 28, 2015. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, expressed concern over the availability of copyrighted material such as building permits. Mr. Grotz explained that the home next door was being built too close to the lot line and staff had suggested he ask the architect for permission to obtain a copy of the building plans, as they were copyrighted material. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS FOR BUILDING HEIGHT, DENSITY, AND FLOOR AREA RATIO, 7200 FRANCE AVENUE, 7200 LLC — RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -12 TABLED TO MARCH 3, 2015 VIII.B. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL, PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 7200 FRANCE AVENUE, 7200 LLC — RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -13 TABLED TO MARCH 3, 2015 Mr. Teague informed the Council that the applicant had submitted a request for extension on February 2, 2015 for thirty days to deal with issues concerning the watershed district. Attorney Knutson answered questions of the Council relating to process. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the extension request of 7200 LLC for Items VIII.A. and VIII.B. to March 5, 2015, and to table consideration to March 3, 2015. The Council discussed directing staff to conduct a study and engage stakeholders concerning the Southdale area including the west side of France Avenue. Mr. Teague shared that the Planning Commission had just requested an amendment to its work plan to begin a study of this exact area, which would piggyback on work the Engineering Department was doing. Member Stewart confirmed with Attorney Knutson that the action taken on this request at the previous City Council meeting was not final. Member Stewart shared that he had a meeting with the developer and the developer did not agree to any concessions. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Stewart Motion carried. VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -02 AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CODE CONCERNING HONEY BEEKEEPING — TABLED TO MARCH 17, 2015 Dianne Plunkett Latham, Energy and Environment Commissioner, discussed two minor changes that had been made to the ordinance. Manager Neal answered questions of the Council, indicating that staff was still having discussions concerning who would enforce the standards as well as the appeal process. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to table consideration of Ordinance No. 2015 -02, Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2015 Amending Chapter 8 of the Edina City Code Regarding Honey Beekeeping to March 17, 2015. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -03 AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF EDINA CODE OF ORDINANCES CONCERNING BICYCLE LANES — ADOPTED Engineer Millner explained that Minnesota State Statutes required the City designate as bicycle lanes those portions of the roadway that were separated from the portion of the roadway used for motor vehicle traffic by physical barrier, striping, marking, or other similar device. The City completed a mill- and - overlay of Olinger Boulevard and bicycle lanes were added. The ordinance adds the roadway to the City's list of designated bicycle lanes. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015 -03, Amending Chapter 26 of the Edina City Code Concerning Bicycle Lanes. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -04 INTERIM ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING MEDICAL CANNABIS MANUFACTURING AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES — ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf explained that operators of medical marijuana facilities were seeking sites for new dispensaries and at least one operator was seeking a location in Edina or Bloomington. This use had not been anticipated in the City's zoning and land use regulations. A one -year moratorium was proposed to study manufacturing facilities and dispensaries. The study period would allow the City to determine whether City Code needed to be amended. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015 -04, an Interim Ordinance Temporarily Prohibiting Medical Cannabis Manufacturing and Distribution Facilities. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.F. REDEVELOPMENT PLANNING UPDATE FOR GRANDVIEW, FORMER PUBLIC WORKS SITE — PRESENTED Mr. Neuendorf shared that in November 2014, the City entered into a Collaborative Development Planning partnership with Frauenshuh to prepare development scenarios for the City -owned property at 5146 Eden Avenue. The team was midway through the exploration phase. Mr. Neuendorf presented the collaborative design planning timeline, activities and process to date, recurring themes, and preliminary desires regarding land use. Dave Anderson, Frauenshuh, presented pictures of the preferences of buildings; green spaces; streetscape and parking; uses; events and activities; and, presented upcoming team activities. V41UG. fl €SOLUT40NI NO. 20IS -119 PERAMSSION TO WORK IN CONSERVAT40N EAC`C-.A EN LEONARD AND MISSY BLUM, 5240 HIGHWl1OD DRIVE, EDINA MN This agenda item was considered as Item VI.B. VIII.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -IS ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -15 accepting various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2015 Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. B. MINUTES: 1. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 18, 2014 2. PLANNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 14, 2015 3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, DECEMBER 11, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received X►. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI.A. CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE REVIEW REPORT AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT — APPROVED Mayor Hovland indicated the full Council with the help of consultant Harry Brull and HR Director Lisa Schaefer met in closed session and conducted the performance evaluation of City Manager, Scott Neal on January 6 and January 20, 2015. He reported the Council found the performance of the City Manager to be excellent. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the employment agreement with City Manager Scott Neal and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement on behalf of the City. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XII.A. REQUEST FOR FINANCING FOR 66 WEST — Received XII.B. LIQUOR ORDINANCE REVIEW: PLAN, PROCESS, AND TIMELINE — Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1 1:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 17, 2015. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 3, 2015, meeting available. Page 6 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 2015 5:41 P.M. Mayor Pro Tern Swenson called the meeting to order at 5:41 p.m. Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Pro Tern Swenson. Mayor Hovland entered the meeting at 6:12 p.m. Also attending was Edina's legislative delegation: Representative Ron Erhardt, Representative Paul Rosenthal and Senator Melissa Franzen. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Steve Grausam, Liquor Director; Ann Kattreh, Park and Recreation Director; Debra Manger, City Clerk; Chad Millner, City Engineer; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director; and Eric Roggeman, Finance Director. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE The City Council, legislators and staff discussed the 2015 session legislative priorities focusing on issues pertinent to cities including, aviation noise, cable television, Sunday liquor sales, transportation, and property taxes. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Manger, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 17, 2015 James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 881 2/5/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 70.40 363817 1862702 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.00 363816 1862703 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 134.40 882 2/5/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 443.89 COFFEE 363465 1162317 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.78 COFFEE 363789 1162368 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 556.67 883 21512015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 44.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 363666 WO- 991170 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 44.60 884 2/5/2015 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 18.87 THERMAL ROLLS, WIPES 00001457 363468 104736 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18.87 885 2/5/2015 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 346.50 UTLEY PARK RENOVATIONS ' 363851 0174799 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 346.50 886 2/512015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 537.84 WELDED YOKES 00005013 363469 926724 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 537.84 887 2/5/2015 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,604.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 363852 8020078 1346.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 580.00 INSPECTIONS AND TESTING 363679 8020652 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 3,184.00 888 2/512015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 846.71 EPR DISPLAY STANDS 00004456 363682 RR69739 4612.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FD Plan Review Software 1,143.86 SURFACE PRO 00004301 363475 RW05967 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 1,338.61 SURFACE PRO 00004301 363475 RW05967 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 99.74 SURFACE PRO WARRANTY 00004301 363795 RX77682 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 99.74 SURFACE PRO WARRANTY 00004301 363795 RX77682 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 34.97 SURFACE PRO CASE 00004301 363796 RX84295 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 3,563.63 889 2/5/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 215/2015 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134730 EXPLORE EDINA CITY OF EDINA UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 25,032.59 DEC 2014 LODGING TAX 363685 Council Check Register by GL 25,032.59 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 215/2015 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 2/5/2015 — 2/5/2015 151.50 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 889 2/512015 894 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS Continued... 155.99 ADAMS PK XCEL BILLING 363683 6132 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 155.99 MAIL LATE NOTICES 363488 98433 890 2/512015 104020 DALCO 895 2/5/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 760.96 CAN LINERS, MOP, BROOM 00001371 363473 2838054 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PIPE, FITTINGS 00001389 363753 114.93 FACIAL TISSUE 00001454 363474 2840340 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 875.89 2/512015 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 891 2/512015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. ACCESS TV MODULE 363754 JJ5615 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 2 Business Unit STORM LIFT STATION MAINT CITY HALL GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 143.05 363823 787952 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 538.30 363639 787954 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 363607 788005 363606 788006 892 215/2015 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134730 EXPLORE EDINA SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 25,032.59 DEC 2014 LODGING TAX 363685 DEC2014 25,032.59 893 215/2015 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 151.50 DOOR REPAIR 363486 D292812 -IN 151.50 894 215/2015 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 2,087.96 MAIL JAN 2015 BILLS 363487 98414 633.34 MAIL LATE NOTICES 363488 98433 2,721.30 895 2/5/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 173.37 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001389 363753 894389 173.37 896 2/512015 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 1,500.00 ACCESS TV MODULE 363754 JJ5615 1,500.00 897 215/2016 101483 MENARDS 77.80 EPDXY, TAPE, FILES 00006276 363692 73557 167.26- RETURN 363758 75127 10.74 CONTACT CEMENT, ROLLER COVEM0001296 363693 75128 5862.5514 5862.5515 1001.4030 1400.6406 5902.6013 5902.6013 5912.6406 1132.6103 5422.6406 1318.6406 1301.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CABLE COMMISSION GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount 897 2/512015 10.47 20.78 102.90 399.80 108.96 207.38 59.30 72.84 63.90 25.80 71.40 83.08 65.29 191.72 15.72 25.04 39.04 1,484.70 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 101483 MENARDS WOOD STAIN 00001343 363577 76033 MAILBOX REPAIR MATERIALS 00001347 363578 76182 SHEETROCK 00001358 363579 76539 MAILBOX POST MATERIAL 00001359 363757 76589 UV COOL MIST TOWER 00001366 363581 76604 SHEETROCK, METAL STUDS, MUD 00001364 363580 76690 LUMBER, ADHESIVE, SCREWS 00001380 363582 76793 OIL, NAIL RINGS 00001381 363495 76800 MAILBOXES 00001382 363494 76801 WOOD SCREWS, BITS 00001383 363496 77095 ROSIN PAPER, ADHESIVE, TROWEL00001384 363497 77101 DIRLL BITS, TAPE, DRYWALL 00006285 363540 77132 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00001395 363583 77254 ANCHORS, LUMBER, TOOLS 00001393 363498 77262 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001402 363584 77346 2X4X8 STUDS, HANGER BOLTS 00001405 363585 77554 HARDWARE 00001403 363759 77638 898 2/512015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 509.60 TOWELS, TISSUE, SOAP 00003552 363499 36068 509.60 899 2/512015 100898 MINVALCO 93.10 HEATING VALVE 00001328 363695 973609 142.44 SENSOR FOR MAKEUP AIR UNIT 00001276 363523 976913 235.54 900 215/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 577.91 BEDKNIFE 00006282 363542 994522 -00 383.57 BEDKNIFE 00006283 363541 994671 -00 961.48 901 215/2015 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 3,467.78 BASE PLATES, ANGLES, PLATES 363507 308767 3,467.78 902 2/512015 129485 PAPCO INC. 87.17 MOP HEADS, DEGREASER 363764 90647 87.17 Account No 5820.6406 1318.6406 47083.6710 1318.6406 1301.6556 5511.6406 47083.6710 47065.6710 1318.6406 47083.6710 5511.6406 5422.6406 5511.6406 47085.6710 47083.6710 47083.6710 1646.6406 1470.6406 7411.6186 5921.6530 5422.6530 5422.6530 47085.6710 7411.6511 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES HEAT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES Business Unit 50TH STREET GENERAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD SNOW & ICE REMOVAL UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 902 2/5/2015 903 2/512015 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 129485 PAPCO INC. 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,307.54 TIRES 00005939 363509 210154825 914.50 TIRE SERVICE / REPAIRS 00005951 363586 210156871 2,222.04 1553.6583 1553.6583 Subledger Account Description Continued... TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES 2/312015 11:00:00 Page - 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 904 215/2015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 998.72 CUTLERY, PLATES 363767 7414 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 244.64 PLATES 363768 7424 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 184.41 TISSUE, DISINFECTANT 00002148 363770 7426 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 331.46 TOWELS, CAN LINERS, HANDLES 00002164 363769 7428 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,759.23 905 2/5/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 287.10 ENVELOPES 363803 84502 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 57.50 BUSINESS CARDS 363802 84570 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 139.30 ENVELOPES 363802 84570 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 567.88 REFERRAL CARDS 363510 84606 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,051.78 906 2/5/2015 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 121.50 363653 14 -16819 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 121.50 907 2/5/2015 104672 SPRINT 16.55 363546 873184124 -146 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 33.10 363546 873184124 -146 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.51 363546 873184124 -146 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 49.05 363546 873184124 -146 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 62.17 363546 873184124 -146 1280.6188 TELEPHONE SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 78.72 363546 873184124 -146 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 121.56 363546 873184124 -146 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 252.00 363546 873184124 -146 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275.93 363546 873184124 -146 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 318.75 363546 673184124 -146 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 356.04 363546 873184124 -146 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 357.91 363546 873184124 -146 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.55 363546 873184124 -146 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 16.55 363546 873184124 -146 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 457.52 363546 873184124 -146 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 907 2/512015 104672 SPRINT Continued... 16.55 363546 873184124 -146 7411.6188 TELEPHONE REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page- 5 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 2,479.46 908 215/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 267.43 CLAMPS 00005977 363525 S3008744.3002 1553.6530 23.28 PLUMBING PARTS 00001412 363771 S3032602.001 1646.6103 290.71 909 2/512015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 8.95 SEAL 00005014 363774 51425 1553.6530 15.66 INSULATORS 00005020 363588 52840 1553.6530 8.95- CREDIT 363775 CM51425 1553.6530 15.66 910 2/512015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 603.55 363659 383714 -00 5822.5513 882.85 363626 383716 -00 5842.5513 2,798.65 363660 383816 -00 5862.5513 4,285.05 390843 215/2015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 317.92 PIPE, ELBOWS, FANS 00001372 363463 362586 47083.6710 45.53 FLEXVENT 00001377 363464 362961 47083.6710 363.45 390844 2/5/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 61.98 PINCH BAR, HOLE SAW 00001406 363564 3159975 1301.6556 61.98 390845 215/2015 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 133.65 COFFEE 363734 38479 5730.5510 133.65 390846 21512015 133614 AMBURG INC. 2,500.00 ED127738 ESCROW REFUND 363788 5912 YORKAVE 1495.4109 2,500.00 390847 215/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 21.96- CREDIT 363737 501170054 5730.5510 434.49 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363735 501230522 5730.5510 REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page- 5 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390847 2/5/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE Continued... 441.22 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363528 501230636 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 566.20 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363736 501270160 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,419.95 390848 2/5/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 784.00 363790 3015320 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,360.00 363700 3015321 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 689.00 363701 3015323 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,388.80 363818 3015324 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,221.80 390849 215/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 144.00 PIZZA 363738 D281N3109 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 390850 2/5/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 200.00 363819 192835 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 200.00 390851 2/5/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 126.95 COFFEE 363466 T5714 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 126.95 390862 2/512015 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 71.17 CANDY/FOOD 363791 012915 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 71.17 390853 2/5/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 518.41 HEATING, THERMOSTATS 00001374 363467 908709946 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 518.41 390854 2/512015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 741.00 363820 124560 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 142.50 363702 124586 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 883.50 390856 215/2015 123621 BRAEMAR ARENA 583.34 ICE TIME 363739 2490 -1 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 583.34 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 10089900 -1/15 1646.6186 HEAT CITY OF EDINA 363565 10437426 -1/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS 363531 5546504 -1/15 Council Check Register by GL HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 363534 5563827 -1/15 5210.6186 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390856 215/2015 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Continued... 11.42 PETTY CASH 363792 012915 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 99.06 PETTY CASH 363792 012915 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 62.00 PETTY CASH 363792 012915 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 172.48 390857 215/2015 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 395.03 PW SCADA GLASS 363470 527416S 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 395.03 390868 2/5/2015 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 48.00 MESH SLEEVES 00001229 363680 12504779 -00 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 46.00 390859 2/512015 121408 BURK, VERA 58.75 TRIP REFUND 363782 012915 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 58.75 390860 215/2015 135836 BURNSVILLE TRAILER HITCH 202.00 10002 ONE MOUNT JR 00001200 363681 120514 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 202.00 390861 21512015 123615 CANADA GOOSE MANAGEMENT INC. 11,946.00 GEESE REMOVAL 363875 201415 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11, 946.00 390862 2/5/2015 103110 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY 114.00 RENTAL FEES 363807 A1019514 -2015 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 114.00 390863 2/5/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 488.00 363821 503704 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,817.95 363605 503705 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 116.00 363822 507436 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 390864 2/5/2016 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 125.28 10089900 -4 19,896.75 10437426 -9 3,390.02 5546504 -1 8,558.56 5563827 -4 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 7 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION SENIOR CITIZENS STREET RENOVATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 363529 10089900 -1/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 363565 10437426 -1/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS 363531 5546504 -1/15 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 363534 5563827 -1/15 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390864 2/5/2015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 1,967.74 5584304 -9 363740 5584304 -1/15 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 50.13 5584310 -6 363742 5584310 -1/15 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 17.90 5590919 -6 363741 5590919 -1/15 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 7,735.22 5591458 -4 363530 5591458 -1/15 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 234.41 5596524 -8 363533 5596524 -1/15 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4,322.93 8034001 -1 363532 8034001 -1/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 82.15 9546705 -6 363566 9546705 -1/15 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 3,128.40 9724639 -1 363535 9724639 -1/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 49,511.49 390866 2/6/2016 123898 CENTURYLINK 123.82 952 831 -0024 363743 0024 -1/15 1552.6168 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.52 952 920 -1586 363516 1586 -1/15 1554.6168 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 69.90 952 922 -2444 363516 2444 -1/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.52 952 920 -8632 363567 8632 -1/15 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 41.15 952 922 -9246 363668 9246 -1/15 1400.6168 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.47 952 920 -9996 363667 9996 -1/15 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 480.38 390866 2/6/2015 135835 CENTURYLINK 2,475.69 612 -D08- 2053 -053 363744 2053 -1/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 2,475.69 390867 2/512015 106194 CITY OF RICHFIELD 105.44 YOUTH BOWLING SHIRTS 363684 012615 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 105.44 390868 2/5/2015 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 170.92 363638 0138431017 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 170.92 390869 2/5/2015 120433 COMCAST 6.76 8772 10 614 0373022 363471 373022 -01/15 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.11 8772 10 614 0540232 363862 540232 -1/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 96.87 390870 216/2016 101961 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC 1,843.09 REPLACE COMPRESSOR 363745 2970 -69581 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,843.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 500.00 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 390874 2/5/2015 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 3,402.92 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 363472 1501 - 609859 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,402.92 2/5/2015 — 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390871 2/512015 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 362.50 TRUCK DRAIN 00001307 Continued... 969532 1641.6556 TOOLS 675.80 BOILER IGNITOR REPAIR 363746 3036339 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 675.80 215/2015 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 390872 2/5/2015 135840 DAKOTA COMMUNICATIONS CENTER 5,674.37 FEB 2015 REFUSE 363863 1009716 4095.6103 630.00 CANCELED COURSE REGISTRATION 363747 REFUND 7401.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PSTF REVENUE 1009717 4095.6103 630.00 6,814.05 390873 21512015 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 2/5/2015 135842 DISTRICT 6 OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 363748 013015 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD MOWING 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION INSPECTIONS 500.00 390874 2/5/2015 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 3,402.92 LUMBER, PLYWOOD 00001179 363472 1501 - 609859 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,402.92 390875 2/5/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 362.50 TRUCK DRAIN 00001307 363476 969532 1641.6556 TOOLS 362.50 390876 215/2015 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 5,674.37 FEB 2015 REFUSE 363863 1009716 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,139.68 FEB 2015 ORGANICS 363864 1009717 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,814.05 390877 2/5/2015 135842 DISTRICT 6 OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION 1,170.00 SCHEDULE CHANGES - EHA 363797 BRAEMAR ARENA 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,170.00 390878 2/5/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 145.00 EDINALIQUORADS 363669 162291 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 145.00 EDINALIQUORADS 363669 182291 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 145.00 EDINALIQUORADS 363669 182291 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 435.00 390879 215/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 303.94 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001379 363477 11569900 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 303.94 390880 2/5/2015 135834 EDINA DESIGN /SILVER HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ED127142 HOME ESCROW REFUND 363670 6409 RYAN AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD MOWING 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 390880 2/5/2015 390881 2/5/2015 390882 2/512015 390883 2/5/2015 390884 215/2015 390885 215/2015 390886 2/5/2015 390887 2/5/2015 390888 2/5/2015 40.00 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 104451 FRANK J. ZAMBONI & CO. INC. 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 10 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDIN BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING 363824 11142 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/512015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 135834 EDINA DESIGN /SILVER HOMES LLC Continued... 2,500.00 130859 EISLER, SYLVIA 58.75 TRIP REFUND 363783 012915 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 58.75 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 222.49 HUBASSEMBLY 363479 1- 4616135 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 162.03 STARTER MOTOR ASSEMBLY 363568 1- 4617299 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 31.63 BATTERY 363570 1- 4616244 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 122.71 BLOWER MOTOR 363478 69- 164772 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 35.71 SWITCH 363480 69- 165709 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 451.03 STARTER MOTOR ASSEMBLY 363569 69- 165851 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 31.63 BATTERY 363571 69- 165927 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 108.13 BRAKE PAD, ROTORS 363572 69- 165973 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,165.36 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 77.00 CREDIT CARD SIGNAGE 363808 190 -67337 5710.6575 PRINTING 208.00 GREAT HALL SIGNAGE 363809 190 -67340 5710.6575 PRINTING 285.00 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 4,606.87 METERS 00001274 363521 0124594 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,721.42 METER, FLANGES 00001274 363749 0124666 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7,328.29 131188 FIRST -SHRED 20.00 SHREDDING SERVICES 363671 135771 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.00 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 475.20 363608 30956 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 40.00 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 104451 FRANK J. ZAMBONI & CO. INC. 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 10 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDIN BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION METER REPAIR METER REPAIR POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING 363824 11142 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EuINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390888 215/2015 104451 FRANK J. ZAMBONI & CO. INC. Continued... 109,570.10 ZAMBONI ICE RESURFACER 363793 76719 5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 109,570.10 390889 2/5/2015 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP RAGS 363536 1006688830 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 15.00 SHOP RAGS 363537 1006711619 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 30.00 390890 2/5/2015 101662 GCSAA 185.00 DUES - BRYAN SANFORD 363794 622901 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 185.00 390891 2/5/2015 129994 GERLACH, GREG 70.00 WINTER GOLF LESSON REFUND 363798 012915 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC 70.00 390892 2/5/2015 134210 GOPHER BEARING 534.48 HVAC REPLACEMENT BELTS 363750 6288975 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 534.48 390893 215/2015 101103 GRAINGER 55.98 LAMPS, TAPE 00002153 363751 9639777094 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.76 HITCH PINS 00005042 363574 9645609125 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 13.98 CUP CADDY 00005042 363573 9645609133 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 174.00 SPRAY PAINT, SHOVELS 00005960 363517 9646580440 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.39 EXIT SIGNS 363752 9650759948 7412.6530 REPAIR PARTS 344.11 390894 215/2015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 256.50 363640 176844 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 4,757.00 363641 177093 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,013.50 390895 2/5/2015 120834 GREEN, RICK 125.17 BATTERY, GLOVES 363799 012815 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.17 390896 215/2015 100790 HACH COMPANY 201.18 REAGENT, PREPS 00001362 363522 9200147 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 201.18 2/3/20- .. 11:00:00 Page- 11 Business Unit ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF RANGE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2/5/2015 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY CITY OF EDINA 345.00 Council Check Register by GL 363482 160002577 1552.6103 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 363481 160002578 1552.6103 2/5/2015 — 2/5/2015 1,035.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390896 2/5/2015 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 100790 HACH COMPANY Continued... 390897 2/5/2015 456.41 132996 HAMMARGREN & MEYER P.A. 363538 012715 1628.4392.03 864.00 LEGAL FEES - COOL AIR 363810 17525 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 920.65 2/5/2015 363811 17771 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 841.50 363812 17870 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 390898 2/5/2015 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY 345.00 HEAT PUMP PROGRAMMING 363482 160002577 1552.6103 690.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 363481 160002578 1552.6103 1,035.00 390899 2/5/2015 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 456.41 TEAM FEE, SOFTBALLS 363538 012715 1628.4392.03 456.41 390900 2/5/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,152.87 CHEMICALS 00001246 363483 3685561 5915.6586 4,152.87 390901 2/5/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,529.25 NOV 2014 ROOM /BOARD 363686 1000052917 1195.6225 3,529.25 390902 2/5/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 306.76 DEC 2014 BOOKING 363687 1000053180 1195.6170 306.76 390903 2/512015 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 150.00 DEC 2014 BUNDLED SERVICE 363689 100001022 1190.6105 150.00 DEC 2014 BUNDLED SERVICE 363688 1000053149 1400.6160 300.00 390904 215/2015 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 1,050.00 TFI TRAINING 363484 00328552 1470.6104 1,050.00 390905 2/5/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 662.00 363825 5822.5514 749.00 363609 744294 5862.5514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR SOFTBALL 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 12 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT BOARD & ROOM PRISONER COURTCHARGES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DATA PROCESSING LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 215/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390905 2/5/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 791.75 363610 744629 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,202.75 390906 2/512015 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 74.57 BIT SET, SAW BLADE 363575 011315 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION 74.57 390907 2/512016 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 276.65 363518 608324827 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 276.65 390908 215/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 204.00 363642 26009 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 300.00 363611 26028 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 504.00 390909 215/2015 105198 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. FOR PROPERTY 375.00 TRAINING - LYNN OLSON 363485 1-1441736 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 375.00 390910 2/5/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 308.92 363678 012515 -PARKS 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 402.14 363678 012515 -PARKS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 170.37 363691 012515- POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 23.00 363865 1/15 -EQUIP 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.46 363866 1/15 -FAC 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 132.61 363866 1/15 -FAC 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10.23 363866 1/15 -FAC 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 5.19 363853 12/14 -ENG 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 236.88 363857 12/14 -EQUIP 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.41 363856 12/14 -FAC 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.86 SUPPLIES 363539 122514 - LIQUOR 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 23.96 SUPPLIES 363539 122514- LIQUOR 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 4,088.03 363690 123114PARKS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,499.06 390911 2/612016 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 606.58 363826 2319863 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,894.55 363644 2319864 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 363643 2319865 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 390911 2/5/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,494.80 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 363703 2319871 5842.5514 363704 2319873 5842.5515 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page- 14 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 9,171.08 390912 2/5/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 577.20 363612 5079917 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,502.48 363717 50820191 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,449.31 363827 5082092 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 188.82 363720 5082094 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 89.66 363719 5082097 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 681.42 363712 5082098 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 255.06 363718 5082099 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,344.52 363709 5082102 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,867.10 363713 5082103 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,232.85 363708 5082104 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.82 363707 5082105 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,371.30 363711 5082106 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 179.32 363706 5082107 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,828.32 363710 5082108 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 477.16 363705 5082109 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,536.66 363645 5082110 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,115.42 363716 5082111 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,234.31 363714 5082112 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 957.83 363646 5082113 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 89.66 363647 5082115 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,517.85 363715 5082116 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 511.72 363648 5082117 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 174.40- 363828 510443 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 27,900.39 390913 2/512015 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 222.09 ACTUATOR 00001348 363755 089369 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 222.09 390914 2/5/2015 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 8.68 KEYS 00001391 363672 S1016520 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8.68 390915 2/512015 135832 KORN FERRY LEADERSHIP CONSULTING CORP. 1.750.00 PERFORMANCE REVIEW CONSULTING 363519 195022297 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOUIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/312015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 — 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390915 2/5/2015 136832 KORN FERRY LEADERSHIP CONSULTING CORP. Continued... 1,750.00 390916 2/5/2015 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 125.00 TOWING SERVICE 363520 73008 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.00 390917 2/512015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 667.48 NUTS, WASHERS, BOLTS 00005910 363489 9302995645 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,099.10 NUTS, SCREWS 00005994 363490 9302995958 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 340.71 HEX NUTS, HEX CAPS, WASHERS 00001351 363491 9302997711 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 66.66 FLAT WASHERS 00001351 363492 9303006975 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,173.95 390918 215/2015 101662 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 90.00 TRAINING - LYNN OLSON 363673 212209 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 90.00 390919 215/2015 135837 LEWIS, GENE 117.50 TRIP REFUND (2) 363784 012915 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 117.50 390920 2/5/2015 104813 LILJENQUIST, HAROLD 117.50 TRIP REFUND (2) 363785 012915 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 117.50 390921 21512015 135277 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC. 1,048.81 SAFETY BOOTS 363493 0230798 -IN 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1, 046.81 390922 2/5/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 98.67 SHEAR CLUTCH YOKE 363576 2150902 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.67 390923 2/512015 134646 MCGRATH, PATTY 39.20 DEC 2014 MILEAGE 363813 012915 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 39.20 390924 215/2015 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,393.75 JAN 29 TRIP 363756 012815 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,393.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2/5/2015 CITY OF EDINA 144.00 Council Check Register by GL CONCESSION PRODUCT 363761 2244 5730.5510 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 390931 215/2015 — 2/512015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390924 2/512015 PROMENADE CLEAN UP FEE 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 7700008155 9232.6103 Continued... 390925 2/512015 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 390932 2/512015 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 363867 4695 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 171.00 665.00 363649 390926 2/5/2015 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 380.50 363613 97220 300.00 HAND SOAP 363500 SOI- 032478 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00 390933 2/5/2016 390927 2/5/2015 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 16 Business Unit ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 32.00 EXAM FEES - DUSTIN HANLY 363760 OPERATOR EXAM 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 32.00 390928 2/5/2015 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 28.00 USSSA POLO SHIRT 363694 8155 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 150.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 363869 8438 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 178.00 390929 2/512015 120925 MINNESOTA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION 120.00 LYNN OLSON 363501 ADVANCED DATA 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRACTICES 120.00 MACHELL BENTLEY 363501 ADVANCED DATA 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRACTICES 390930 2/5/2015 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 144.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363761 2244 5730.5510 144.00 390931 2/5/2015 101796 MPCA 62.50 PROMENADE CLEAN UP FEE 363868 7700008155 9232.6103 62.50 390932 2/512015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 665.00 363649 97219 5862.5513 380.50 363613 97220 5842.5513 1,046.50 390933 2/5/2016 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 490.50 SIGN FILM 00001340 363502 TI- 0281833 4090.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EUINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390933 2/5/2015 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS Continued... 926.06 SIGN BLANKS . 00001340 363504 TI- 0282068 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 353.04 BLACK LETTERS 00001341 363503 TI- 0282079 1325.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 1,419.40 SIGN BLANKS 00001341 363505 TI- 0282095 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 3,132.66 SIGN BLANKS 00001341 363506 TI- 0282144 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 6,321.66 390934 215/2015 135839 NICHOLS, ROSEMARY 58.75 TRIP REFUND 363786 012915 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 58.75 390935 2/6/2015 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 54.34 OFFICE SUPPLIES 363696 728909347001 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 46.74 CHAIRMAT 00006383 363800 748267292002 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.08 390936 2/5/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 462.00 RANGE WIRE 363762 552722 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 462.00 390937 2/512015 104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC. 70.00 AIR TEST ANALYSIS 363763 1500030 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 70.00 390938 2/5/2016 103906 PARSONS ELECTRIC 2,412.00 POOL LIGHT REPAIR 363765 48172 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,412.00 390939 2/5/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 3,427.89 363614 8484527 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 766.47 363650 8484541 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,580.84 363615 8484547 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 673.76 363829 8484944 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 390940 2/5/2015 129057 PCCS INC. 950.00 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001071 363508 5854 1551.6103 950.00 390941 2/5/2015 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 624.33 363543 47743084 5761.5510 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 17 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS STREET NAME SIGNS SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION PSTF RANGE PSTF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 2/5/2015 YORK SELLING 106641 PODNIEKS, VIZMA CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 2/3/2015 11:00:00 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 117.50 TRIP REFUND (2) 363787 Council Check Register by GL 5422.6530 Page - 18 117.50 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 135336 POLLAND, JIM 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 BALL PUSHERS 363801 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390941 2/512015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 199.22 FILTERS 434.30 125297 363651 49308194 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,058.63 2/5/2015 101914 REPYA, JOYCE 390942 2/5/2015 51.75 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 363674 012915 275.00 EDITION EDINA 363766 012615 -5 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 275.00 390943 215/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 172.57- 363830 206542 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 99.66 363729 2735428 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 930.66 363726 2735431 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.16 363727 2735432 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,589.58 363721 2735433 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 437.60 363728 2735434 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,470.09 363723 2735435 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.32 363724 2735436 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 510.10 363652 2735437 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 509.00 363722 2735438 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 264.14 363725 2735565 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 390944 2/5/2015 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 217.60 363617 23337 291.50 363616 23343 390945 2/5/2015 YORK SELLING 106641 PODNIEKS, VIZMA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES 117.50 TRIP REFUND (2) 363787 012915 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.50 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 390946 2/5/2015 135336 POLLAND, JIM 135.00 BALL PUSHERS 363801 539959 135.00 390947 215/2015 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 199.22 FILTERS 00006281 363544 125297 199.22 390948 2/5/2015 101914 REPYA, JOYCE 51.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 363674 012915 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390948 21512015 101914 REPYA, JOYCE Continued... 51.75 390949 2/5/2015 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO INC 105.21 FILTER 00005921 363587 C68229 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.21 390950 215/2015 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 280.14 PARTS WASHER - SOLVENT 363524 65737080 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 280.14 390961 216/2016 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 29.23 " "' * ".. " "•'9 350 363545 IMAGE PLUS 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 29.23 390952 2/5/2015 100995 SEH 1,106.67 ENGINEERING SERVICES 363858 292098 08060.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHTING 542.06 NORMANDALE ST RECONS 363859 292818 03474.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION NORMANDALE RECON 4,592.06 ROUNDABOUT PREL ENGR 363860 292821 01430.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VALLEY VIEW & TRACY IMPR 1,446.48 2014 ANTENNA PROJECTS 363697 293012 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 7,687.27 390953 21512015 120784 SIGN PRO 25.00 PARK SIGN 363511 8644 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 185.00 DASHERBOARD 363512 8646 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 210.00 390954 2/5/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 24.72- 363832 0014596 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,501.00 363834 1248973 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 736.66 363731 1248974 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,590.54 363835 1248976 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,354.27 363623 1248977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,146.42 363618 1248979 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,084.58 363619 1248980 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,512.70 363833 1248981 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,728.13 363730 1248982 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 90.66 363620 1248983 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,002.50 363622 1248984 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 79.24 363655 1248985 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,654.13 363654 1248986 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 101015 STREICHERS CITY OF EDINA 138.00 2/3/2015 11:00:00 2015 - 136068 363773 11133656 138.00 OTHER Council Check Register by GL 2015 - 137140 Page- 20 390959 2/5/2015 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 363676 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary TEE MARKERS 363547 S207186 -IN 327.04 2015- 137140 5842.6122 2/5/2015 — 2/5/2015 390960 2/5/2015 101035 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390954 2/5/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 873197 Continued... 1,564.21 363836 1248987 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,399.45 363621 1248988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 575.85 363831 1250196 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,995.57 363838 5009165 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,995.57 363837 5009166 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 37,986.76 390955 215/2015 135841 SPYDER TRAP INC. 3,600.00 CONSULTING AND SET -UP 363772 2709 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 3,600.00 390956 2/512015 128187 ST PAUL POLICE DEPARTMENT 239.00 CLASS FEE - MORGAN PIPER 363513 PISTOL SKILLS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 239.00 390957 2/5/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 390958 2/5/2015 101015 STREICHERS ADVERTISING 138.00 AMMO 2015 - 136068 363773 11133656 138.00 OTHER 363676 2015 - 137140 5862.6122 390959 2/5/2015 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 363676 2015 - 137140 327.04 TEE MARKERS 363547 S207186 -IN 327.04 2015- 137140 5842.6122 ADVERTISING 390960 2/5/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 18.55 363657 873196 1.874.90 363658 873197 390961 2/5/2015 1.092.00 800.00 215.57 215.59 215.59 2,538.75 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA BRIDE MAGAZINE AD WEDDING ADS EDINA LIQUOR AD EDINA LIQUOR AD EDINA LIQUOR AD 5862.5514 7414.6406 5422.6406 5862.5515 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 363804 2015- 136066 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 363548 2015 - 136068 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 363676 2015 - 137140 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 363676 2015 - 137140 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 363676 2015- 137140 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/512015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390962 2/5/2015 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. Continued... 265.00 PARK BOARD MEETING 1/13/15 363870 M21069 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 265.00 390963 21512015 120595 T- MOBILE 32.60 ENGINEERING - GPS UNIT 363675 477067848- 1261.6188 TELEPHONE 32.60 390964 2/5/2015 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 97.40 GLASS 363514 694308 1500.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 169.54 DOOR PADDLES 363776 695621 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 266.94 390965 2/5/2015 129105 TWIN SOURCE 195.51 OMNI AIR DISPENSERS, REFILLS 00001398 363777 00443013 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 195.51 390966 2/512015 103048 U.S. BANK 889.25 4TH QTR HSA MAINT 363814 9133933 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 889.25 390967 2/5/2015 122897 UPS 13.16 SHIPPING CHARGE 363778 0000Y6W726045 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 13.16 390968 215/2015 100668 URS CORPORATION 2,557.50 PROMENADE PHASE 4 363861 6127081 01251.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,557.50 390969 21512015 101354 USGA 110.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 363805 43750116 -2015 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 110.00 390970 2/5/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 111.40 LIQUOR BAGS 363871 336047 -02 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5.66- CREDIT 363872 337470CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 105.74 390971 215/2015 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 25.26 363699 9736386772 1140.6188 TELEPHONE 25.26 363699 9736386772 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 21 Business Unit PARKADMIN. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT CONTINGENCIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF ADMINISTRATION A -251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 390971 2/5/2015 390972 2/5/2015 390973 2/5/2015 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 269.25 179.50 448.75 363625 62826 363624 62831 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 372.43 LEAK LOCATE 00001975 363526 5693 372.43 390974 2/5/2016 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 187.04 10/14 -12/14 MILEAGE 21.28 10/14 -12/14 MILEAGE 208.32 390975 2/612015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 313.16 423.98 661.28 363815 013015 363815 013015 363732 7016189 363733 7016192 363661 7016193 5842.5513 5842.5513 5913.6103 1490.6107 5952.6107 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE LIGHT & POWER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 22 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING YORK SELLING DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC HEALTH RECYCLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 94.54 363699 9736386772 1260.6188 94.54 363699 9736386772 1554.6188 211.09 363699 9736386772 1495.6188 283.66 363699 9736386772 1470.6188 486.36 363699 9736386772 1400.6160 28.51 363699 9736386772 44012.6710 116.55 363699 9736386772 5910.6188 723.01 363698 9736439703 1400.6406 31.02 363698 9736439703 5910.6188 35.01 363550 9738105128 1140.6188 35.01 363550 9738105128 1322.6185 140.04 363550 9738105128 1260.6188 140.13 363550 9738105128 1554.6188 315.11 363550 9738105128 1495.6188 420.16 363550 9738105128 1470.6188 735.43 363550 9738105128 1400.6160 35.03 363550 9738105128 44012.6710 175.05 363550 9738105128 5910.6188 757.35 363549 9738157641 1400.6406 31.38 363549 9738157641 5910.6188 4,939.50 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 269.25 179.50 448.75 363625 62826 363624 62831 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 372.43 LEAK LOCATE 00001975 363526 5693 372.43 390974 2/5/2016 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 187.04 10/14 -12/14 MILEAGE 21.28 10/14 -12/14 MILEAGE 208.32 390975 2/612015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 313.16 423.98 661.28 363815 013015 363815 013015 363732 7016189 363733 7016192 363661 7016193 5842.5513 5842.5513 5913.6103 1490.6107 5952.6107 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE LIGHT & POWER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Page - 22 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) PLANNING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) YORK SELLING YORK SELLING DISTRIBUTION PUBLIC HEALTH RECYCLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390975 215/2015 101512 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 1,398.42 390976 215/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,731.36 363662 1080281481 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.09 363665 1080281482 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,114.39 363664 1080281483 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,279.54 363842 1080281564 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 104.31 363663 1080281565 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,198.72 363630 1080281568 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 409.60 363841 1080281569 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 139.71 363629 1080281570 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,675.05 363627 1080281571 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,278.55 363628 1080281572 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 409.60 363840 1080282755 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 391.23 363839 1080282756 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20.00- 353844 2080072105 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 45.00- 363843 2080072129 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 339.08- 363848 2080072134 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50.67- 363846 2080072166 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 60.00- 363847 2080072185 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 153.32- 363631 2080072203 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 68.32- 363632 2080072205 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17.08- 363845 2080072207 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 25,066.68 390977 2/512015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 801.10 363636 1090351302 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,799.20 363637 1090351303 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,213.75 363633 1090352072 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 363634 1090352073 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 363635 1090352074 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,513.30 363849 1090354350 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 184.80 363850 1090354411 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,781.25 390978 2/512015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 55.28 51- 4420190 -3 363527 442671379 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 15.97 51- 0010619811 -5 363677 442918480 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34.16 51- 0160483 -1 363557 442922387 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 37.88 51- 0194596 -8 363554 442922999 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:00 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390978 215/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 42.89 51- 0223133 -2 363563 442923802 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,096.98 51- 4159265 -8 363779 442978264 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 14.45 51- 6541084 -2 363556 443015867 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 92.00 51- 6692497 -0 363562 443020156 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 64.27 51- 8997917 -7 363552 443046477 1321.6165 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 124.37 51- 9770164 -7 363551 443054667 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 27.30 363553 443056571 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.54 51- 0010118404 -0 363561 443057446 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 976.47 51- 0010166207 -2 363560 443062968 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5.41 51- 0010573502 -3 363558 443069988 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 5.41 51- 0010573385 -0 363559 443078625 '1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 5.41 51- 0010573384 -9 363555 443078628 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 31,873.91 51- 4621797 -2 363781 443156506 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7,815.34 51- 6644819 -9 363873 443185038 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 15.25 51- 8997917 -7 363780 443215000 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,410.49 51- 6955679 -8 363874 443368619 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 52,748.78 390979 2/5/2015 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 14.65 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 363806 54061370 5210.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 14.65 529,821.05 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 469, 884.45 A/PACH Payment 59,936.60 Total Payments 529,821.05 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/3/2015 11:00:06 Council Check Summary 2/5/2015 - 2/5/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 156,436.07 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,606.16 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 25,175.20 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 9,002.64 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,533.94 05500 I C E AR E NA F U N D 120, 694.61 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 20,478.75 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 16,455.56 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,865.55 05800 LIQUOR FUND 149,902.48 05900 UTILITY FUND 16,963.63 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 155.99 05950 RECYCLING FUND 21.28 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,466.69 09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 62.50 Report Totals 529,821.05 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date Page - 1 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 911 2/12/2016 118261 2ND WIND EXERCISE INC. 121.50 TREADMILL REPAIR 364241 021046936 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 121.50 912 2/12/2016 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 3,837.25 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 363883 21501221 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10,666.75 WASH DOOR REPAIRS 364242 21501261 1553.6565 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,767.85 DOOR SPRING REPLACEMENT 364243 21502043 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 18, 271.85 913 2/12/2016 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 51.50 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 364109 134241 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 232.65 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 364108 134243 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 284.15 914 2/12/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 692.85 364360 46875700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 831.85 364165 46875800 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 151.33 364164 91533900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,676.03 915 2/12/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 61.45- CREDIT 364094 CP -WO- 990503 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 39.35 NOTARY STAMP 363894 IN -3299 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 39.99 FILE FOLDERS 363895 OE- 382615 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 20.39 DATE STAMP 364196 WO- 985897 -1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 224.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003125 363896 WO- 991559 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 28.06 PENS 363897 WO- 992045 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 20.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009389 364091 WO- 992358 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 43.09 DISINFECTANT WIPES 00009389 364092 WO- 992358 -2 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 52.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 363898 WO- 992565 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 83.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003126 364093 WO- 992617 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 364142 WO- 992994 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 73.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 364248 WO- 993488 -1 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES 686.36 916 2/12/2016 101376 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 462.80 DOOR REPAIR 00001355 364204 589375 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 403.00 REPAIR DOOR LOCKS 00001355 363899 589361 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 865.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 917 2/12/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 71.01 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005610 364385 887555 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.90 COOLANT 00005924 364341 929727 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 73.35 SENDER, GASKET 00005029 363900 930028 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 97.16 COVER 00005034 364342 930503X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 163.96- CREDIT 364343 CM926953 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 141.46 918 2/12/2015 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 203.52 OCE USAGE 364251 988381902 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 203.52 919 2112/2015 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 255.00 DISINFECTANT CLEANER 363904 518251 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 391.00 HEAVY DUTY CLEANER 363905 518259 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 646.00 920 2/12/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 2,072.00 INSPECTION SERVICES 364255 2115 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 233.14 JAN 2015 XCEL BILLING 363906 6133 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,305.14 921 211212015 105693 CITYSPRINT 16.65 COURIER SERVICE 364097 33638 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19.69 COURIER SERVICE 364097 33638 1346.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38.34 922 2/1212015 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 183.04 SENSOR 00003557 364256 159442 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 183.04 923 2112/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS INSPECTIONS STORM LIFT STATION MAINT CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 484.20 364361 154751 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 484.20 924 2/12/2015 104020 DALCO 367.30 TOWELS, TISSUE 00001454 364208 2844528 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 229.68 RESTROOM CLEANER 00001437 364207 2844942 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 596.98 925 2/1212015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 WEB DEVELOPMENT CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Council Check Register by GL CARAMEL CORN 364111 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 144.00 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 927 2112/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 925 2/12/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6,969.50 JAN 2015 BILLINGS Continued... 1,280.00 364010 787953 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 241.75 364030 788983 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 24.60 364031 788984 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,793.66 364032 788986 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 803.35 364029 788987 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 49.20 364028 788988 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 926 2/12/2015 WEB DEVELOPMENT 129718 DREW S CONCESSIONS LLC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 144.00 CARAMEL CORN 364111 1791 -1 1400.6103 144.00 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 927 2112/2015 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,969.50 JAN 2015 BILLINGS 364268 1894 6,969.50 928 2/12/2015 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 1,689.50 SUMP TANK REPAIRS 363920 46689 1,689.50 929 2/1212015 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 113.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 364270 020915 113.28 930 2/1212015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 310.12 PIPE, FITTINGS 00001415 363926 895427 310.12 931 2112/2015 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 600.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 364391 JJ5455 900.00 AQUATIC CTR FORM CHANGES 364391 JJ5455 300.00 EDIN PK FORM CHANGES 364391 JJ5455 875.00 EDINET MAINTENANCE 364392 JJ5551 925.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 364393 JJ5557 25.00 POLICE FORM CHANGES 364394 JJ5609 1,025.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 364394 JJ5609 4,650.00 932 2/12/2015 101792 LUBE -TECH 3,088.05 OIL 00005040 363932 578594 5520.5510 1470.6103 5521.6180 5840.6107 5915.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 3 Business Unit TUMN JCLLINU 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS WATER TREATMENT COMMUNICATIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 932 211212015 101792 LUBE -TECH Continued... 3,088.05 933 2/12/2015 103944 MED COMPASS 7,238.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 364288 24697 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7,236.00 934 211212015 101483 MENARDS 138.05 BULBS, PROPANE CYLINDER 00001416 363935 77715 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 35.84 SCREWS 00001483 364289 78115 47065.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 173.89 935 2/1212015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 209.10 BOWL CLEANER 00003558 364290 36117 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 209.10 936 2/12/2015 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 398.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 495.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 613.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,605.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,558.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 972.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,275.00 UNIFORMS 363941 NIA7880 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 180.00- CREDIT 363942 NIA7880 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 38.75 UNIFORM SWEATSHIRT 00005604 364296 NIA7880C 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 15,774.75 937 2/1212015 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 19,545.12 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 364228 020615 03479.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 20,726.18 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 364228 020615 04395.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON 40,273.30 938 2/1212015 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 1,958.30 RED FOAM 364301 2524 5720.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,958.30 939 2/12/2016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 2,281.12 TIRE SERVICE 00005939 363948 210154181 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 479.00 TIRES 00005939 363947 210159369 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,760.12 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 939 2/1212016 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. Continued... 940 211212015 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 702.41 HOT CUPS, WIPES, TOWELS 00002353 364308 7418 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 493.76 TOWELS, GLOVES, LINERS 363950 7420 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 923.28 HOT CUPS, LINERS, NAPKINS 00002353 364307 7432 -02 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 505.16 TISSUE, GLOVES, LINERS 00002156 364305 7432 -08 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 556.00 DOOR MAT 00002353 364306 7490 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,180.61 941 2/1212016 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 203.00 SPRAY BODIES 363952 0056589 -IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 203.00 942 2/12/2015 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 172.50 HUNG DRINKING FOUNTAIN 363953 17211 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 172.50 943 2/1212016 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 57.50 BUSINESS CARDS 364158 84729 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.50 944 211212015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 243.63 BRASS FITTINGS 00001452 364406 S3012492.001 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 268.23 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001480 364233 S3035256.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 512.06 946 211212016 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 4,190.00 PLOW 00005050 364316 34639 1553.6565 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,190.00 946 211212015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 974.81 VEHICLE REPAIRS 364410 661609 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 364411 661911 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 559.00 VEHICLE REPAIR 364234 667211 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,749.81 947 2/1212015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,104.49 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363966 41515467 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 35.72 363967 41544243 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,994.19 363968 41594827 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 -- 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 947 211212015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 67.01 363969 41610240 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 3,201.41 948 2/12/2016 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 120.00- 364191 382872 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.00- 364192 384128 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 465.90 364190 384279 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,002.85 364189 384395 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,264.75 390980 2/12/2015 136278 AAS, ANN 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 364125 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 390981 211212015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 35.28 FITTINGS 00001246 363884 366086 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 35.28 390982 2/12/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 106.30 POWER TOOL, LED WORK LIGHT 363886 3165134 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 1,799.99 PORTABLE GENERATOR 00001279 363885 3166698 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 346.68 TOOLS 00001433 364202 3168545 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 266.89 PORTABLE AIR FILTER BLASTER 364201 3169684 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,519.86 390983 2/12/2015 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. 734.24 CYLINDERS FOR BALER 364195 3762 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 734.24 390984 2/12/2015 100665 AMSAN 403.98 CLEANING SUPPLIES 364203 328574389 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 403.98 390985 211212015 134182 ANGELICA, MARION 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 364126 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 390986 2/1212015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 603.63 CONCESSION PRODUCT 364244 502030149 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 519.44 CONCESSION PRODUCT 364245 502060540 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 COST OF GOODS SOLD 122.78 COST OF GOODS SOLD CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD 2/10/2015 11:45:52 2/1212015 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364326 020915 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 390991 2/1212015 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 390986 2/12/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 211212015 Continued... 1,123.07 111.15 ART WORK SOLD 364127 020315 390987 2/12/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 390993 2/12/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 622.95 364009 3015322 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING D281N3072 330.00 360.00 364358 3016283 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 360.00 420.00 364246 364356 3016285 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PIZZA 364247 628.00 364359 3016286 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 390994 921.50 364357 3016287 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 228.80 70.00- 363891 364025 306868 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,852.45 390988 2/1212015 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 34.99 287257682821 363887 01252015 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.99 390989 2/1212015 102709 BIDS LAUNDRY SYSTEMS 122.78 REPLACED PUMP 363888 SO10082659 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 122.78 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 390990 2/1212015 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 16,408.30 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364326 020915 16,408.30 390991 2/1212015 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 860.00 FEB 2015 SNOW REMOVAL 364090 144236 860.00 390992 211212015 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 111.15 ART WORK SOLD 364127 020315 111.15 390993 2/12/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 363889 D281N3072 360.00 PIZZA 363890 D281N3122 360.00 PIZZA 364246 D281N3132 360.00 PIZZA 364247 D28IN3139 1,368.00 390994 2/12/2015 125139 BERNICK'S 228.80 363891 191314 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET PSTF OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 -- 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390994 2/12/2015 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 200.20 363892 192831 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 429.00 390995 2/12/2015 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 67.50 CPFFEE 363893 T8090 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COBRAINSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 8 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES A -257 XERXES ALLEY 55THT056TH A -258 XERXES ALLEY 54THT055TH ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION I COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 67.50 390996 2/12/2015 132641 BEST, KATIE 28.60 ART WORK SOLD 364128 020315 5101.4413 28.60 390997 2/12/2015 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 1,575.25 FINAL PAYMENT 364384 021315 01257.1705.30 1,575.25 FINAL PAYMENT 364384 021315 01258.1705.30 3,150.50 390998 2/12/2015 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 353.98 ART SUPPLIES 00009384 364096 4032083 5110.6564 151.00 ART SUPPLIES 00009387 364095 4032709 5110.6564 504.98 390999 2/12/2015 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 386.00 COMPACTOR RENTAL 364249 FEB2015 -1 4095.6103 386.00 391000 2112/2015 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN 17,979.28 FEB 2015 PREMIUM 364250 FEB2015 1556.6043 193,485.78 FEB 2015 PREMIUM 364250 FEB2015 1556.6040 211,465.06 391001 2/12/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 377.34 PARTS 00001427 364205 908781479 47083.6710 377.34 391002 2/12/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 696.21 364166 124685 5842.5513 696.21 391003 2/12/2015 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 625.49 COUNCIL FRAMES 364143 020006024 1100.6406 ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CRAFT SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COBRAINSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 8 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES A -257 XERXES ALLEY 55THT056TH A -258 XERXES ALLEY 54THT055TH ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION I COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF rLANA 2/10/2u'15 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391003 2/12/2015 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING Continued... 625.49 391004 2/12/2016 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 363975 020215 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 391005 2112/2015 134674 CAPITAL CITY GLASS INC. 5,318.58 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364327 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 5,318.58 391006 2/12/2015 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,087.20 364027 508163 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 966.00 364026 512100 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,053.20 391007 2/12/2015 111089 CARLSON, ERIC 255.91 UNIFORM PURCHASE 364252 020315 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 255.91 391008 2112/2015 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 16.20 ART WORK SOLD 364129 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 18.20 391009 2112/2016 129923 CAWLEY 16.60 NAME BADGE 363901 V270338 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 16.60 391010 2/12/2016 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 238.87 JOINTER, GLOVES 00001399 364253 197058 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 238.87 391011 2/1212015 105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC 535.62 TREE REMOVAL 00001501 364344 020115 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 535.62 391012 2/1212016 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 480.00 CPR INSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATION 364386 00564499 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 480.00 391013 211212015 123898 CENTURYLINK R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391013 2/1212015 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 55.97 952 929 -0297 363903 0297 -1/15 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 439.72 952 927 -8861 363902 8861 -1/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 495.69 391014 2/12/2015 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 363976 1768503 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 669.12 391015 2/12/2015 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 364206 512498 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.00 391016 2112/2015 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 1,590.00 ACCREDITATION FEE 364345 PH1226 - 1/2 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 1,590.00 391017 2/1212015 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 139.60 CITY HALL FLAGS 364254 COM -0503 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 139.60 391018 2112/2015 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 291.34 364167 0128594818 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 291.34 391019 2/12/2015 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 436.00 COCOA 00002354 364257 0742446 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 438.00 391020 2/1212015 134650 CRAWFORD, LINDY 35.28 DEC 2014 MILEAGE 364110 020215 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 35.28 391021 2/12/2015 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,355.04 BRAEMAR BLANKETS 363907 34331 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMI N ISTRATION 1,355.04 391022 211212015 124336 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 2.60 ART WORK SOLD 364130 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391023 2/12/2015 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED Continued... 171.72 PLEATED FILTERS 364346 3036962 5720.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 171.72 391024 2/1212015 105160 DAKOTA UNLIMITED 3,585.30 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364328 22451 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3,585.30 391025 2/1212015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 110.95 AIR RATCHET, CLIPS 00005032 364258 975016 1553.6556 TOOLS 5.51- CREDIT 364259 975070 1553.6556 TOOLS 105.44 391026 211212015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 556.75 110311893 364260 110311893 -1/15 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 26.50 650487671 363909 650487671 -1/15 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 92.50 651972955 363908 651972955 -1 /15 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 675.75 391027 2/12/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 435.00 AQUATIC CENTER AD 364261 182289 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 435.00 EDINBOROUGH PARKAD 364262 182290 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,362.05 EDITION EDINA 364197 184431 1130.6575 PRINTING 327.50 LIVING STREETS AD 364263 184432 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,559.55 391028 2/12/2015 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 36.96 RECEPTACLE, PLUG 00001356 364098 11574900 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,398.00 COBRAHEADLIGHTS 00001061 363911 11578000 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101.25 COUPLINGS, REFLEX STRIPPER 00001390 363910 11607700 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,536.21 391029 2112/2015 103594 EDINALARM INC. 343.07 PRO SHOP ALARM MONITORING 364264 94301 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE 192.00 ALARM MONITORING 364265 94340 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 535.07 391030 2/12/2016 106906 EGAN COMPANY 182.50 TROUBLESHOOT SIGNAL 00001294 363912 JC10113047 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 182.50 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 11 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE POOL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS TRANSPORTATION PSTF OCCUPANCY TRAFFIC SIGNALS UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391031 2/1212015 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS Continued... 152.73 JAN 2015 MANAGEMENT FEE 363977 013115 1001,4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 152.73 391032 2/12/2015 101627 ELASKY, JEFF 426.20 CONFERENCE AIRFARE 364266 020915 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 428.20 391033 2112/2016 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 4,378.16 PUMP REPAIR 00001269 363913 0054605 -IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,378.16 391034 2/1212015 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 2,626.94 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003515 364267 1708904 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 2,626.94 391035 2/1212015 134601 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES INC. 426.25 STREET SWEEPING MGMT PLAN 364112 01169- 0001 -7 04414.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 426.25 391036 2112/2015 135843 EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC 380.56 SERVICE VALVE SOLENOIDS 00008017 364113 901997797 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 380.56 391037 2/12/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 35.71 SWITCH 364209 1- 4617081 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6.02 INSULATOR RR STA 364210 1- 4617082 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 66.34 BATTERIES 00005950 363914 1- Z03472 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.03 OIL FILTER 364211 69- 166457 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 124.10 391038 2112/2015 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 29.15- CREDIT 363918 3626257 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 30.60- CREDIT 363917 3647675 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 523.27 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363915 3675290 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,564.23 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363916 3696367 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,027.75 391039 2112/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 129.09 GV WRENCH 00001448 364212 0123537 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,870.62 METER, FLANGES 00001448 364213 0125157 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 12 Business Unit GENERAL FUND REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STREET SWEEPING MANAGEMENT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS DISTRIBUTION METER REPAIR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391039 2/12/2015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 877.96 REPAIR CLAMPS 00001322 364214 0125194 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 911.55- CREDIT 364215 CM011935 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,966.12 391040 2/1212015 133257 FILBIN, SUSAN 3.90 ART WORK SOLD 364131 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 3.90 391041 2/1212015 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC. 415.44 RESCUE EQUIPMENT 00003536 364269 8645 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 415.44 391042 2/1212015 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 1,490.00 RINK FLOODING HOSES 363919 75733 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,490.00 391043 2/1212016 131188 FIRST -SHRED 21.80 SHREDDING SERVICES 364103 137428 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.80 391044 2/12/2015 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 364132 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 52.00 391045 2/12/2015 102727 FORCE AMERICA 24.72 GASKET 364216 01440394 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 24.72 391046 2/12/2015 132389 GAZICH, KATHLEEN 17.94 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 363978 012215 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.94 391047 2/1212015 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 17,367.82 EDINA SPORTS DOME EQUIP 364329 88676 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 17,367.82 391048 2/12/2016 112776 GEORGE F. COOK CONSTRUCTION CO. 34,680.61 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364330 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 34,680.61 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 13 Business Unit UIJ I MItsu I IUN DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMIN ISTRATI ON SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391049 2112/2015 102764 GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHESTRA Continued... 100.00 EP PERFORMANCE 2/15/15 364145 020115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 391050 211212015 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 357.20 JAN 2015 SERVICE 364217 132034 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 357.20 391051 2/1212015 101103 GRAINGER 299.84 SAFETY GLASSES 364218 9651814940 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 215.62 DRILL BITS, TAPE, SCREWS 364219 9651814957 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 515.46 391052 211212015 136845 GRANEY, ESTHER 42.87 PRACTICE AMMO 364146 REIMBURSEMENT 7414.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 42.87 391053 2/1212015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 421.00 364034 177396 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 236.50 364168 177442 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 182.25 364033 177443 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 839.75 391064 2/12/2015 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 5,920.00 GOLF LESSONS 364271 0000020415 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 5,920.00 391055 2112/2016 100788 H &L MESABI 2,699.76 PLOW BLADES, CURB RUNNERS 00005045 363921 92646 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,699.76 391056 2112/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,721.75 CHEMICALS 00001250 364220 3690313 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,721.75 391057 2/12/2015 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 140.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 363922 155565 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 140.00 391058 2112/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,370.00 TEMPO EMT REFRESHER 364099 38049 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391058 2/1212015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER Continued... 2,370.00 391069 2/1212016 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 364144 38186 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,475.08 391060 2112/2015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 8,297.10 REPAY EXCESS TIF 364114 TIF 1202 9234.4009 TAX INCREMENTS 8,297.10 391061 2/1212015 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 613.06 JAN 2015 BOOKING FEES 364272 1000054172 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 613.06 391062 2112/2016 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEE 364387 1000048206 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1,272.00 RADIO FLEET FEE 364388 1000050055 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 2,544.00 391063 2112/2015 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 600.25 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 364274 557661 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,226.13 EVIDENCE ROOM FURNISHINGS 364275 557662 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.28 OFFICE FURNISHINGS 364273 557663 1551.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 2,003.66 391064 2112/2015 103763 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 525.78 SANITIZER, MOPS, TOWELS 00002168 364276 601482092 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 216.42 CLEANING SUPPLIES 363923 700166848 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 742.20 391066 2/12/2016 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,042.00 364035 745489 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 840.00 364036 745515 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,279.00 364169 745809 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,161.00 391066 211212016 130161 HOLLE, AMANDA 536.27 SPRUCE TIPS FOR GRAND OPENING 364115 010515 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 536.27 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CONTINGENCIES CITY HALL GENERAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CONTINGENCIES GENERALSUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION CITY OF EDINA GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES Council Check Register by GL GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 391067 2/1212015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 41.24 UNIFORM PURCHASE 363924 020215 1646.6201 41.24 391068 2/12/2015 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 170.89 UNIFORM PURCHASE 363925 012714 1301.6201 170.89 391069 211212015 134784 IDEA CREEK LLC, THE 130.00 PLAQUE 364277 65 1470.6406 130.00 391070 211212015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 7.42 364348 1/15 -LIQ 5861.6530 29.02 364348 1/15 -LIQ 5861.6406 7.03 364008 1/15- STREETS 1301.6556 18.13 364008 1/15- STREETS 1401.6406 113.96 364008 1/15- STREETS 1301.6406 93.87 364008 1/15- STREETS 4090.6406 17.75 364008 1/15- STREETS 5820.6406 55.50 364007 1/15- UTILITY 5912.6530 60.38 364007 1115- UTILITY 5921.6530 106.90 364007 1/15- UTILITY 5912.6406 177.54 364007 1/15- UTILITY 5913.6406 51.56 364347 1/25 -FIRE 1470.6406 11.59 364118 10 /11 /12- UTILIT 5921.6406 Y 13.94 364118 10 /11 /12- UTILIT 5921.6530 Y 23.57 364118 10/11/12 - UTILIT 5912.6406 Y 495.35 364118 10/11/12 - UTILIT 5913.6406 Y 23.24 364118 10 /11 /12- UTILIT 5932.6530 Y 12.70 364119 11/12- STREETS 1500.6406 93.62 364119 11/12- STREETS 1314.6406 402.59 364119 11/12- STREETS 1301.6406 86.91 364119 11/12- STREETS 4090.6406 312.87 364389 11/14 -FIRE 1470.6406 120.31 364390 12/14 -FIRE 1470.6406 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 16 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL WELL HOUSES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WELL HOUSES DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT GENERALSUPPLIES WELL HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERALSUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES GENERALSUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 391070 2/12/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 51.74 64.98 2,452.47 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/1212015 Doc No Inv No Account No 364116 12/14- STREETS 1301.6406 364117 12/14- UTILITY 5913.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 17 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 391071 2/12/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 6,178.10 364011 2319872 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,604.55 364170 2319901 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,839.60 364037 2319902 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,170.05 364038 2319903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.80 364039 2319905 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,695.80 364362 2319908 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17,526.90 364013 5083361 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 391072 2/12/2015 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 79.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 364147 020415 5720.6201 LAUNDRY 79.96 EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 391073 2112/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 101.16- 364046 506455 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 207.49 364012 5082093 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 836.19 364041 5082095 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,454.98 364040 5082096 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,031.03 364014 5082100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,261.84 364042 5082114 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,107.84 364013 5083361 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 451.16 364370 5087133 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 606.96 364368 5087138 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WANE YORK SELLING 134.21 364174 5087139 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 263.47 364173 5087142 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,729.59 364366 5087144 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,092.49 364369 5087145 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,485.23 364363 5087146 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 793.22 364364 5087147 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 158.80 364365 5087148 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,649.82 364372 5087149 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,065.66 364371 5087150 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,429.57 364367 5087151 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,794.35 364374 5087153 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,532.48 364373 5087154 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 611.91 364171 5087155 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391073 2/12/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 359.00 364172 5087159 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 74.16- 364043 509885 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 27.99- 364045 510718 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 10.12- 364044 510719 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37,843.86 391074 2/12/2015 135858 JOHNSON, DANIEL & DEBRA 66.34 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 364349 310 DEARBORN CT 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 66.34 391076 2/1212016 136844 KALLIS, DUANE 120.00 PRACTICE AMMO 364148 REIMBURSEMENT 7414.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 120.00 391076 2/12/2015 102080 KATTREH, ANN 1,582.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 364395 2014 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 1,582.00 391077 211212016 111018 KEEPRS INC. 43.89 00003872 364279 265634 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.56 UNIFORMS 00003544 364278 265770 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.16 00003544 364280 265770 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.61 391078 211212015 108679 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION 7,600.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364331 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 7,600.00 391079 2112/2015 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 24,274.78 50TH & FRANCE SOUTH RAMP 364396 6400761 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 24,274.78 391080 211212015 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 120.00 PRACTICE AMMO 364149 REIMBURSEMENT 7414.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 120.00 391081 2/12/2016 130216 KUEHL, RHONDA 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 364133 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/1212015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391082 2112/2015 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC. Continued... 168.84 TOILET PARTS 00001430 364350 SI- 322490 1646.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 16.56 AERATOR 00001430 364351 SI- 322731 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 185.40 391083 2/12/2015 124611 LARSCO INC. 1,261.95 REPAIR KITS 00001360 363928 3321 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,768.67 VALVES FOR CHEM FEED 00001361 363927 3322 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,030.62 391084 2/12/2015 133060 LARSON, CINDY 24.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 364150 020315 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 3.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 364120 11/5/14 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 27.74 391085 2/1212015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 452.20 BITS, SCREWS, NUTS 00005957 363929 9303011329 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 356.99 SAW BLADES 00005007 363931 9303023643 1553.6556 TOOLS 449.59 TY -RAP, WASHERS, CABLE TIES 00005959 363930 9303024911 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,258.78 391086 211212015 135661 LEAP MANUFACTURING LLC 541.70 HOT BOX TRUCK RENTAL, ASPHALT 364281 125 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 541.70 391087 2/12/2015 113213 M G MCGRATH INC. 4,533.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364332 020615 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4,533.00 391088 2/12/2015 136855 MACARTHUR CO. 1,393.20 POLYMER PANELING 364282 546035 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 6,122.68 PANELING, CORNER PIECES 364283 548643 47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 7,515.88 391089 2/12/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 5,109.00 PLOW 364397 1150014 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 57.09 ROLLER STUDS 00005044 364284 2151016 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,445.25 FILTER KIT, TOW BAR, PINS 00005023 363934 2151065 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 712.83 SCRAPERS, FILTER KIT 00005024 363933 2151067 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 7,324.17 211012015 11:45:52 Page - 19 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE WATER TREATMENT WELL HOUSES PLANNING PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 11, 070.86 CITY OF EDINA 2110/2015 11:45:52 391092 2/1212015 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary EDINA SPORTS DOME 364333 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 2/12/2015 — 2/1212015 11,350.60 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391090 2112/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY Continued... 377.78 19,563.40 UNLEADED FUEL 00005043 364222 210841 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,923.74 DIESEL FUEL 00005043 364221 218037 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26,487.14 568.94 391091 211212015 391094 131581 MARCO INC. 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 11 070.86 PRINTER MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT 364285 INV2400606 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN METER REPAIR 500.00 FIRE INVESTIGATOR EXAMS 364294 3050 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 11, 070.86 391092 2/1212015 135856 MARS CARPET SALES 11,350.60 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364333 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 11,350.60 391093 2/12/2015 122664 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 377.78 OXYGEN 00003649 364286 10637757 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 191.16 OXYGEN 00003649 364287 10650565 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 568.94 391094 2/12/2015 134336 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC. 1,200.00 HYDRANT METER DEPOSIT REFUND 363979 012915 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 1,200.00 391095 211212015 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 191.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 363936 020215 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 191.50 391096 2/12/2015 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 385,231.33 MAR 2015 SEWER SERVICE 364151 0001040451 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 385,231.33 391097 2/1212015 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 631.48 VEHICLE REPAIRS 363937 256355 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 631.48 391098 2/12/2016 118464 MIDWEST TESTING 1,645.00 RENTAL METER INSPECTIONS 00001441 363938 3431 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,645.00 391099 2/12/2015 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UTILITY REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN METER REPAIR 500.00 FIRE INVESTIGATOR EXAMS 364294 3050 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391099 2112/2015 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD Continued... 391100 2/12/2015 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 67.70 CLEANING PRODUCTS 364227 SOI- 032811 1552.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 67.70 391101 2/12/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,385.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001449 364223 34878 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,385.00 391102 2/1212016 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 11,907.00 WATER PURCHASED 364291 431 - 0005.300 -2/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 15 11, 907.00 391103 2/12/2015 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 351.84 CASTERS FOR SANDER RACKS OOOD5922 364224 14275 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 351.84 SWIVEL CASTERS 00005926 364293 14310 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 703.68 391104 2/1212016 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 91.67 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 364121 81946 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 91.67 391106 2/12/2016 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 38.00 FORFEITURE FORMS 364292 18174880 1400.6575 PRINTING 38.00 391106 2/12/2016 102776 MINNESOTA DNR -OMB 35,177.73 WATER USE 364225 PERMIT 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 1973 -1119 35,177.73 391107 2/12/2015 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 83.85 CAM LOCKS 364226 0107659 -IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 532.00 NOZZLES 00001321 364295 0107687 -IN 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 615.85 391108 211212016 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 419.90 2015 UTILITY RATE INSERTS 364152 17017 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 419.90 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 21 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL WATER TREATMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391108 2/12/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 391109 2/12/2016 134087 MI -TECH SERVICES INC. 900.00 SEWER - LATERAL INSPECTIONS 363939 32015725 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 900.00 391110 2/12/2015 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 200.00 EP PERFORMANCE 2/19/15 364153 020115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 391111 2/12/2016 102308 MSANI 150.00 CONFERENCE FEE 364154 BRANDON KUSKE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 391112 2/12/2015 114343 MULLEN, JANET 29.25 ART WORK SOLD 364134 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 29.25 391113 2112/2015 130266 MUNICODE 3,406.38 SUPPLEMENT #1 CITY CODE 364398 00250451 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 3,406.38 391114 2/12/2015 124571 MURPHY, WENDY 25.11 PRETZELS FOR RESALE 363980 013115 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 25.11 391115 2112/2015 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 37,294.15 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364334 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 37,294.15 391116 211212015 103007 NELSON, DAVID 462.42 AIRFARE FOR CONFERENCE 363940 REIMBURSE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 462.42 391117 2/12/2015 132609 NOLAN, MARK 16.79 JAN 2015 MILEAGE 363981 020215 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 21.44 WIRELESS MOUSE 364122 11- 12/2014 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION 47.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 364122 11- 12/2014 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 85.83 391118 2/12/2015 102450 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391118 2112/2015 102450 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Continued... 2,050.19- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 364399 012915 07122.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,481.29- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 364399 012915 05548.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5,030.79 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 364399 012915 05547.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5,254.34 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 364399 012915 05546.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 16,464.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 364399 012915 05502.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 23,217.95 391119 211212015 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 2,778.00 TYPIST LICENSES 364297 IN56487 1400.6160 DATAPROCESSING 140.00 SOFTWARE FOR LICENSES 364299 IN56488 _ 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 230.88 ADDITIONAL LICENSE 364298 IN56489 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 3,148.88 391120 2/12/2016 132607 NYSTROM, JERRY 120.00 PRACTICE AMMO 364155 REIMBURSEMENT 7414.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 120.00 391121 2/1212015 136857 OBRIEN, GERALD 397.18 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 364353 5107 49TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 465.26 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 364352 5115 49TH ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 862.44 391122 2/12/2016 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 286.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 363943 749079264001 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 286.83 391123 2/12/2016 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 18.20 CHAIN 00005925 364300 553784 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 18.20 391124 2/12/2016 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 32,537.55 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 364229 0020315 04398.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 32,537.55 391125 2/12/2015 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 48,952.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364335 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 48,952.00 391126 2/1212015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN 23.40 ART WORK SOLD 364135 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 23 Business Unit S122 XERXES SIDEWALK LOOP WM COCORD WM PRESCOTT CIRCLE WM WM -502 RAW WATER WELL15 TO WTP POLICE DEPT.,GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PUBLIC PROGRAMS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391126 211212015 116603 PARKER, KATHLEEN Continued... 23.40 391127 2/12/2015 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 486.00 364047 15001 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 486.00 391128 2/12/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 128.25- 364052 8464173 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 104.25- 364054 8466985 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.15- 364053 8478194 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.00 364050 8482549 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,083.75 364048 8484555 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 897,76- 364375 8485356 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,051.49 364175 8485516 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.25 364176 8485518 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 884.97 364051 8485520 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,111.65 364049 8485522 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 441.26- 364177 8485574 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,572.44 391129 2/12/2015 126492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 UTILITY TRANSACTION FEES 363944 38084032 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 391130 2/12/2015 132860 PENTEON 31.25 NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS 364400 32189 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 31.25 NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS 364400 32189 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 221.00 CITY EXTRA USE AND HOSTING 364400 32169 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 3.67 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01394.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT NORMANDALE 3.67 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01396.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BRAEMAR HILLS C 3.67 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01411.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT EDINATERRACE NHOOD RECON 3.67 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01418.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 2014 SLP STREET PROJECTS 3.67 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 44012.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01416.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01410.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01395.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BRAEMAR HILLS B 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01409.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01407.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT HAWKES NHOOD RECON 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01408.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT WARDEN AVE 3.68 CONSTRUCTION LIST 364400 32189 01404.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount 391130 2/1212016 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.67 31.25 31.25 221.00 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.67 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.68 3.67 692.00 Supplier / Explanation 132860 PENTEON CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS CITY EXTRA USE AND HOSTING CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST CONSTRUCTION LIST 391131 2/12/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 391132 2112/2015 391133 2/12/2016 391134 2/1212015 1,662.81 1,662.81 116626 PETERSON, HARRIETTE 6.99 ART WORK SOLD 6.99 136849 PETSMART #2412 60.90 K9 DOG FOOD PO # Doc No Inv No 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 364400 32189 364400 32189 364400 32189 364400 32189 364400 32189 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 364401 32210 363945 47743094 364136 020315 364156 T-4854 01397.1705.24 01398.1705.24 01393.1705.24 01406.1705.24 03471.1705.24 1130.6124 1120.6103 1130.6124 01394.1705.24 01396.1705.24 01411.1705.24 01418.1705.24 44012.1705.24 01416.1705.24 01410.1705.24 01395.1705.24 01409.1705.24 01407.1705.24 01408.1705.24 01404.1705.24 01397.1705.24 01398.1705.24 01393.1705.24 01406.1705.24 03471.1705.24 5520.5510 5101.4413 4607.6406 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT WEB DEVELOPMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES LAKE EDINAA LAKE EDINA B MENDELSSOHN A MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON RICHMOND HILLS PK COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS NORMANDALE BRAEMAR HILLS C EDINA TERRACE NHOOD RECON 2014 SLP STREET PROJECTS P23 50TH &FR PARKING&WAYFI N DING 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON BRAEMAR HILLS B WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON HAWKES NHOOD RECON WARDEN AVE FRANCE AVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR LAKE EDINAA LAKE EDINA B MENDELSSOHN A MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON RICHMOND HILLS PK ARENA CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Business Unit Continued... CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 391134 2/1212015 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 41.16- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 364062 205743 5862.5513 5.33- 364056 206543 5862.5513 14.00- 364055 206544 5862.5513 6.00- 364063 206773 5842.5513 30.00- 364061 206774 5862.5513 5.33- 364060 206775 5862.5513 8.00- 364059 206776 5662.5513 21.32- 364058 206777 5862.5513 3.33- 364064 206806 5842.5513 6.00- 364057 206807 5862.5513 338.78 364015 2735427 5822.5513 237.80 364016 2735429 5822.5513 1,421.84 364380 2738669 5842.5513 3.48 364376 2738671 5862.5512 162.91 364179 2738673 5822.5512 54.16 364178 2738675 5822.5515 1,676.26 364381 2738677 5842.5513 522.06 364378 2738678 5842.5512 345.96 364379 2738679 5842.5513 2,228.62 364377 2738681 5862.5512 6,851.40 391136 2/12/2015 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,115.13 BRINE ENHANCER 364302 240572 1318.6406 2,115.13 391136 2112/2015 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 237.80 HANGING BASKET PLANTS 364303 328102 5720.6620 237.80 391137 211212015 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.89 PEST CONTROL 364100 4652410 7411.6103 44.89 391138 2/12/2015 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 250.00 STAFF AND GROUP PORTRAITS 363946 012115 1130.6408 250.00 391139 2112/2015 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,681.16 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY 364157 2 /02 /15POSTAGE 1600.6235 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 26 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE PARKADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 — 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391139 2/12/2015 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS Continued... 5,681.16 391140 211212015 106152 POWERPLAN 3,465.72 CHAINS 00005895 363949 P27234 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,465.72 391141 2/1212015 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 97.66 PAINT 364123 940602038682 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.66 391142 2/12/2015 126979 PRECISE MRM LLC 900.00 GPS 364304 IN200- 1004280 1316.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 900.00 391143 2/1212015 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. 83.00 SEAT CUSHION PADDING 00005022 364230 90171 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 83.00 391144 2/1212015 135046 PRESTIGE DRYWALL 13,794.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364336 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 13,794.00 391146 2/12/2016 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 329.20 PUMP PARTS 00005046 364231 22973- 24346SO 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 329.20 391146 2112/2015 104455 PUPPE, RICHARD 254.81 UNIFORM PURCHASE 363951 012815 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 254.81 391147 2112/2015 105707 RAINBOW INC. 14,250.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364337 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 14,250.00 391148 2/12/2015 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 161.49 SAFETY BOOTS 363954 2680000001231 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 131.74 SAFETY BOOTS 363954 2680000001231 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 169.99 SAFETY BOOTS 363954 2680000001231 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 463.22 2/10/2015 11:45 :52 Page - 27 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET GENERAL MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391149 2112/2015 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. Continued... 4,458.48 50TH & FRANCE IMPROVEMENTS 364402 123114 44012.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING 4,458.48 391150 2/12/2015 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 490,00 ZAMBONI AD SALES 363955 115151 -10 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 240.00 DASHERBOARD SALES 363956 115151 -8 5501.4317 ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES 730.00 391151 2/1212015 125178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 27,009.35 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364338 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 27,009.35 391162 2/12/2016 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 55.83 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 364311 00306006 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 608.00 363957 00309773 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 120.88 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 364310 00310294 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 183.84 SOFTENER SALT 364309 00310674 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 968.55 391153 2/12/2015 101963 S &S TREE SPECIALISTS 406.00 FORESTRY SERVICES 364312 908620407 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 406.00 391164 2/12/2015 104161 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 813.09 QUARTERLY BILLING 364313 8103932248 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 786.30 QUARTERLY BILLING - RAMP 364314 8103932925 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,599.39 391156 2/12/2016 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER - LUBRATT 110.10 TRANSDUCERS 00001404 364232 INV099897 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 110.10 391156 2/12/2015 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 285.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 364354 020915 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 285.00 391157 2/12/2016 136287 SEABERG, KURT 2.93 ART WORK SOLD 364137 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.93 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391158 2112/2015 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL Continued... 204.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 364101 020315 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 65.79 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 364102 020415 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 290.27 391159 2/12/2015 100995 SEH 6,441.94 54TH ST BID DOCS AND CPS 364403 292819 01416.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 71,865.69 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS & CP 364404 292823 01412.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 78,307.63 391160 2/12/2016 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 20.45 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 363982 020215 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 125.13 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 363982 020215 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 243.64 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 363982 020215 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 364138 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 397.02 391161 2/12/2015 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 46.05 ART WORK SOLD 364139 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 46.05 391162 2112/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 1,177.00 BACKYARD RINK SIGNS 364161 8558 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,178.00 RINK GLASS SIGNS 364159 6576 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,225.12 BRAEMAR FIELD SIGNS 364160 8650 5552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 600.00 HANG CHAMPIONSHIP BANNERS 363958 8670 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,180.12 391163 2/12/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 75.76 HOT DOG BUNS 363959 257196 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 57.82 363960 257633 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 11515 363961 258276 5520 5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 122.38 371.11 391164 2/12/2015 748.25 748.25 391165 2/12/2015 3,717.94 363962 258553 5520.5510 132195 SMALL LOT MN 364070 1832 5842.5513 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC COOLER SHELVING 364405 52241 5800.1720 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2/10/2ui 5 11:45:52 Page - 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING BUILDINGS LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 -- 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subl edger Account Description Business Unit 391166 2/12/2016 102936 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC Continued... 3,717.94 391166 2/12/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 72.00- 364069 0014662 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 704.84 364017 1248975 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.88 364183 1250632 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.00 364067 1250634 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,755.13 364068 1251209 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 678.29 364182 1251210 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 124.50 364180 1251212 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,655.33 364181 1251213 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,005.33 364184 1251214 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,533.30 364382 1251215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,725.75 364065 1251216 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 243.00 364066 1251217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,762.10 364018 5009164 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22,120.45 391167 2/12/2015 110977 SOW, ADAMA 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 364140 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 391168 2/12/2016 116176 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON 1,000.00 POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR 364407 128057 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,213.46 POLICE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR 364407 128057 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,213.46 391169 2/12/2015 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS 247.46 ALARM REPAIRS 364315 12098013 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 247.46 391170 2/12/2016 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 729.33 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 363983 013115 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 729.33 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 363983 013115 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 729.34 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 363983 013115 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 2,188.00 391171 2/12/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 168.00 364071 4619 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 168.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2u 15 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page - 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391171 211212015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 391172 2/12/2015 101015 STRETCHERS 407.90 K9 OFFICER UNIFORM 364104 11134163 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 99.98 K9 OFFICER UNIFORM 364105 11134790 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 507.88 391173 2/12/2015 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 2/26/15 364162 020115 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 391174 2/12/2016 133760 STRYKER SALES CORPORATION 54,606.00 POWER LIFT COTS 00003876 364408 1636588 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9,265.29 POWER LIFT COTS 00003876 364409 1639066 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 63,871.29 391175 2/12/2015 102584 SUPER AMERICA 332.78 DEPOSIT REFUND 364317 REFUND DUE 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 332.78 391176 2/12/2016 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 132.80 FILTER, STRAINER 00005041 363963 912841290 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.80 391177 2/12/2016 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 44.80- 364188 00741354 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.65 364185 874535 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 156.25 364186 874536 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,298.10 364187 674537 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,463.20 391178 2/12/2015 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 646.75 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 363964 2015- 137138 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 646.75 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 364318 2015- 137138 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 646.75 EXPLORE EDINAAD 364319 2015- 137139 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,940.25 391179 2/12/2016 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 166.00 ART /CULTURE MEEING 364106 M21071 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 166.00 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 32 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 391180 2/12/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Continued... 237.37 PROPANE 00001354 364235 10061146 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,089.51 WELDER 00001396 364236 10063228 1301.6556 TOOLS 1,326.88 391181 2112/2016 123649 TOWMASTER 81.80- CREDIT 364321 108594 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 81.80 DUMP HINGE OOOD5027 364237 365797 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 44.88 HINGE 364320 365891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 44.88 391182 2112/2015 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 5.30 BACKGROUND CHECKS 364163 01516353 1400.6160 DATAPROCESSING 5.30 391183 2112/2015 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 111.00 JAN 2015 USAGE 364107 269634 -2/15 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 111.00 391184 2112/2016 101127 TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC. 1,377.50 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364339 020615 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 1,377.50 391186 2/12/2016 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 465.91 HYDRANT REPAIR KITS 00001446 363965 547098 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 465.91 391186 211212015 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 1,661.00 EXCAVATE FOR WATER MAIN REPAI60001450 364238 21238 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,661.00 391187 2/12/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 63.89 FORKS, TOWELS 364199 336048 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 214.75 LIQUOR BAGS 364199 336048 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 65.01 LIQUOR BAGS 364200 336048 -01 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 111.40 LIQUOR BAGS 364198 336048 -02 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 97.04 CAN LINERS 00001431 364322 338211 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 552.09 391188 2/12/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 675.49 LIGHTING FOR CITY HALL 00001375 364323 9011815 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page - 32 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391188 2/12/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY Continued... 675.49 391189 2/12/2016 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 117.96 BRATS 363970 82540 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 103.14 BRATS 363971 84755 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 221.10 391190 2/12/2015 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 244.05 STREET LIGHT BULBS 00001300 363972 15259414 -00 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244.05 391191 2112/2015 120720 WAKEFIELD, TODD 225.00 EMT REFRESHER 364324 020615 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 225.00 391192 2/12/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 2,875.33 CHEMICAL CLEAN UP 364124 1133 - 1080 -9 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 38.15 FEB 2015 SERVICE 364239 7080690 -2282 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2.913.48 391193 211212015 130574 WATSON COMPANY 474.16 CONCESSION PRODUCT 363973 847911 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 474.16 391194 2/12/2016 106305 WEDDINGPAGES LLC 750.01 THE KNOTAD 00006389 364355 1003431032 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 750.01 391196 2/12/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 282.32 364072 7016190 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 282.32 391196 2112/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,065.20 364020 1080281566 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,058.97 364021 1080281567 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,587.80 364019 1080282754 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,188.33 364075 1080284256 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.15 364076 1080284257 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 191.45 364074 1080284258 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,561.01 364073 1080284259 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 2/10/2015 11:45:52 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 391196 2/12/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 331.78 364194 1080284260 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 339.45 364193 1080284261 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,832.76 364079 1080284262 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,034.70 364078 1080284263 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.15 364077 1080284284 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 76.00- 364081 2080072108 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 15.00- 364080 2080072126 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI NE VERNON SELLING 18,264.75 391197 2/12/2016 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,787.95 364024 1090354412 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 23.10 364023 1090354413 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,723.50 364022 1090354414 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,074.00 364082 1090354691 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,169.55 364083 1090355363 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 364084 1090355364 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,731.58 364383 1090357655 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14,532.78 391198 2/12/2015 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 144.12 HELMET SHIELDS 00003548 364325 E1302546 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 144.12 391199 2/12/2016 136221 WYLIE, SALLY 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 364141 020315 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 391200 2/12/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 34.57 51- 0193479 -4 363991 443084263 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 1,083.85 51- 5107681 -4 363987 443159663 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 938.96 51- 4827232 -6 363994 443165711 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 1,728.55 51- 5547446 -1 363988 443176262 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 307.26 51- 6046826 -0 363995 443179782 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 36.12 51- 8102668 -0 364000 443203966 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 44.02 51- 8976004 -9 364002 443215138 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 937.94 51- 9011854 -4 363992 443215242 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 280.38 51- 8987646 -8 364001 443216136 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,845.06 51- 9603061 -0 363986 443221943 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 273.71 51- 9337452 -8, 363996 443222321 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 359.12 51- 9608462 -5 363990 443228723 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 391200 2/12/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation 101726 XCEL ENERGY 40.28 51- 0010103585 -7 2,057.64 51- 0010060454 -7 40.66 51- 0010504853 -2 17.69 51- 0010619810 -4 17.56 51- 0010619788 -5 593.47 51- 5634814 -2 81.64 51- 5938955 -6 2,316.33 51- 6229265 -9 1,216.39 51- 9251919 -0 1,089.07 51- 6979948 -4 1,523.72 51- 6979948 -4 1,962.33 51- 6979948 -4 566.78 51- 9422326 -6 18.24 51- 4151897 -6 26,339.01 51- 4888627 -1 5,062.95 51-- 4888627 -1 2,312.15 51- 4966303 -6 277.72 51- 6137136 -8 41.12 51- 7567037 -0 61,444.29 391201 2112/2015 135854 XP SOLUTIONS 8,455.50 STS MODELING SOFTWARE 00002640 364240 11121 5960.6103 8,455.50 391202 2/12/2015 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES LLC 21,660.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364340 020615 5550.1705 21, 660.00 391203 2/1212015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 69.57 FILTER, LUBE 00005961 363974 PCO01635506 69.57 1,683,128.78 Grand Total 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,550,548.30 A/PACH Payment 132,580.48 Total Payments 1,683,128.78 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 35 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STORM LIFT STATION MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROMENADE EXPENSES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 2/1212015 - 2/1212015 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 363993 443231793 5210.6185 363985 443241528 5210.6185 363997 443244569 1321.6185 363999 443246518 1321.6185 363998 443246672 1321.6185 364004 443351549 5934.6185 364003 443355895 4086.6185 363984 443359162 1470.6185 364005 443400278 5765.6185 363989 443740224 5821.6185 363989 443740224 5861.6185 363989 443740224 5841.6185 364006 443768277 1322.6185 364088 443860766 1646.6185 364089 443872064 5511.6185 364089 443872064 5553.6185 364086 443876563 1330.6185 364085 443890824 5430.6185 364087 443911219 1321.6185 391201 2112/2015 135854 XP SOLUTIONS 8,455.50 STS MODELING SOFTWARE 00002640 364240 11121 5960.6103 8,455.50 391202 2/12/2015 103226 YEADON FABRIC DOMES LLC 21,660.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 364340 020615 5550.1705 21, 660.00 391203 2/1212015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 69.57 FILTER, LUBE 00005961 363974 PCO01635506 69.57 1,683,128.78 Grand Total 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description Continued... LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,550,548.30 A/PACH Payment 132,580.48 Total Payments 1,683,128.78 2/10/2015 11:45:52 Page- 35 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STORM LIFT STATION MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROMENADE EXPENSES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS TRAFFIC SIGNALS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 468,704.26 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 2,050.19- 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 119,612.53 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,827.58 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,097.92 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,273.96 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 9,258.55 05500 ICE ARENA FU N D 53, 960.70 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 266,936.28 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 7,445.03 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,273.58 05800 LIQUOR FUND 163,230.05 05900 UTILITY FUND 510,882.81 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 63,033.90 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,344.72 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 8,297.10 Report Totals 1,683,128.78 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 2/12/2015 - 2/12/2015 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures date 2/10/2015 11:45:59 Page- 1 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Approve Out -Of -State Travel for City Council Members �gNA. 1e o rA >4� �^S yO �•'�`f�fllilY)1i �1�0 IHHN Agenda Item #: IV. C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Motion to approve out -of -state travel for City Council Members to attend the National League of Cities' 2015 Congressional Cities Conference in Washington DC Information / Background: The Edina City Council adopted a policy on December 6, 2005 that requires the City Council to approve out - of -state travel for City Council Members. In order for the City to pay for the travel, lodging, subsistence and other conference - related costs, the travel must be approved in advance by the City Council at an open meeting and must include an estimate of the cost of the travel. In evaluating the out -of -state travel request, the Council will consider the following: • Whether the elected official will be receiving training on issues relevant to the city or to his or her role as the Mayor or as a council member. • Whether the elected official will be meeting and networking with other elected officials from around the country to exchange ideas on topics of relevance to the City or on the official roles of local elected officials. • Whether the elected official will be viewing a city facility or function that is similar in nature to one that is currently operating at, or under consideration by the City where the purpose for the trip is to study the facility or function to bring back ideas for the consideration of the full council. • Whether the elected official has been specifically assigned by the Council to visit another city for the purpose of establishing a goodwill relationship such as a "sister- city" relationship. • Whether the elected official has been specifically assigned by the Council to testify on behalf of the city at the United States Congress or to otherwise meet with federal officials on behalf of the city. • Whether the city has sufficient funding available in the budget to pay the cost of the trip. Attendance at this conference will allow Council Members to network with elected officials from around the country; to attend training and informational sessions on contemporary local government issues; to attend a supplementary training /information session on aviation noise; and to meet and discuss intergovernmental issues with Edina's elected officials in the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2 I estimate the cost of the travel (transportation, lodging, meals and conference fee) to be approximately $2,200 per Member. I can confirm that the City has sufficient funds available to pay the costs of this trip. RECOMMENDATION: The National League of Cities' Congressional Cities Conference represents an important learning, networking and advocacy opportunity for City Council Members. I recommend that the City Council approve the requested action on this matter. • r�ooRroxA'�ti� • less To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police F Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Request for Purchase — Two 2015 - Chevrolet Traverse; One 2015 Chevrolet Impala Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: January 6, 2015 Company: Polar Chevrolet Recommended Quote or Bid: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Contract # 72021 General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: December 30, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 70,130.35 Replacement of three unmarked investigative police vehicles per equipment replacement schedule. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Request for Purchase — 2015 Jeep Cherokee; 2015 Ford Taurus Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: January 6, 2015 Company: Nelson Auto Center Recommended Quote or Bid: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Contract # 72045 General Information: o e ,MC�RPORAT�9 • lees Agenda Item #: IV. E. The Recommended Bid is Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: December 30, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $ 46,309.38 Replacement of two unmarked investigative police vehicles per equipment replacement schedule. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and City Council From: Susan Faus Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Request for Purchase — MaxGalaxy Recreation Software Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: December 29, 2014 Company: Maximum Solutions Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: MaxGalaxy o e7t'- v � lass CO IBBA Agenda Item #: IV.F. The Recommended Bid is ❑X Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $34,690.00 General Information: Maximum Solutions is a leading software provider for the recreation industry. The company is based in Edina but serves customers across the country. The Parks & Recreation Department including Braemar Arena, Edinborough Park, Aquatic Center, and Art Center has been using MaxEnterprise services and applications for over 10 years. The services provided are point of sale (POS), facility scheduling, program registration, membership management and league scheduling. MaxGalaxy is the newest release from MaxSolutions and would replace MaxEnterprise. Benefits of MaxGalaxy: • MaxGalaxy is a Web Hosted Cloud Based Solution. Staff will be able to access the software from any location an internet connection is available. • Shared Database. Currently, each facility has a separate database that is not integrated. • Improved Applications • Unlimited Technical Support • Frequent Data Backups • Unlimited Bandwidth Usage • Level I Security and PCI Compliance The price proposal includes costs for set up and configuration, training, individual facility cost broken down per month and one new installation (Centennial Lakes). City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER This is a sole source bid. Attachments: MaxGalaxy Informational Brochure Price Proposal City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 • What's New in MaxGalaxy (For MaxEnterprise Users) With the release of MaxGalaxy, it brings a whole new game to the way you schedule and manage your daily activities for your company or organization. Building off the great success with MaxEnterprise, MaxGalaxy gives a new platform and that gives us the ability to enhance the software which was possible on MaxEnterprise's older platform. Below you will find a summary of many of the notable "customer requested" improvements to date in MaxGalaxy versus MaxEnterprise, broken down by category. Many more are being added each day. MaxGalaxy Facility Scheduling •r:a. rYO iX] j u e s.e..IXI I a sa.oralX1 I rwr s.rte.eq X;': s°u".sm ow L', ;a m® Y The first most noticeable difference MaxEnterprise (ME) users will see is the whole new scheduling screen. This scheduling screen was built so that customers could access and see their schedules (as well as make reservations) on a day, week, month and timeline views. The new screen also allows users to drag and drop reservations which wasn't previously possible in the ME scheduling grid, as well as viewing all the event details by simply hovering over it. In addition some other notable features are: Some key new features are: • New availability schedule feature replaces /streamlines the Business Hours and Seasons features found in MaxEnterprise. It also provides more functionality (e.g., different hours on different days of the week, and during different seasons) that was previously allowed. • Rate Charts now offer new "day of" hourly rates, "day of flat rates, enhanced rates according to residency, rates according to age, new conditional rates according to event attendance and even new conditional rates according to event duration. Safe to say a few more options than in MaxEnterprise. • Ability to "share" facilities. Now instead of having to always use sub facilities, MaxGalaxy allows you to share facilities if you which. • Facility layouts feature allows users to tie a Layout document to scheduled events (e.g. we need the room setup this way for this particular - event). In addition users can also tie as many use permits (e.g. we need a facility, deposit and alcohol permit for this event). Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other. • Ability to set default # of locker rooms by event type as well as by account. • "Include maintenance in customer's purchased time" by facility (instead of globally). • Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other. • Ability to tie individual facilities to a separate A/R accounts if desired. • Specify default event and maintenance durations in hours and /or minutes (not just minutes as found in MaxEnterprise). • Two new "When Events Span Multiple Rates" options = use highest rate, use lowest rate. • In Book Recurring Events a new "custom" booking option (for different times on different days) has been added for more complex schedules. Now you can include locker room assignments while doing these bookings. • Mass Edit gives the new ability to "sort" results by any column on the screen, multi -edit attendance numbers, multi -edit use permits, as well as multi -edit facility layouts. ,:. rune zoia s s I aM Sma .e�. YaY SrG;�... wr:hlr a rM.a. arw srY nm laaFr ns pa >In � �• DYy� ar rayr �. nn>r In u an6..nn urns Ir.. o-..r ` igpm a A :. Goan bar NiiA-SbY d CNr4a.i� _ OYOYP..r QsYV.ie Star q nra ba�Y rrs 0.a>In M.a P« -r Mw DrpM Mrm 6 >b 20pe�5rY b b b b R Onn SYr urns. u;or:. i.l Ornl.}� urar,a� urns pYSbb R ' wG.sYr am Ya>la Yx�pasY rnrYmr Ye�PeV -In s . s „ � pmsMa opm ataY OaoYr s. .. .. h,n. riarr rw o.e-r Ys.aarr rw oiwa. _- .yr u.ycsr- The first most noticeable difference MaxEnterprise (ME) users will see is the whole new scheduling screen. This scheduling screen was built so that customers could access and see their schedules (as well as make reservations) on a day, week, month and timeline views. The new screen also allows users to drag and drop reservations which wasn't previously possible in the ME scheduling grid, as well as viewing all the event details by simply hovering over it. In addition some other notable features are: Some key new features are: • New availability schedule feature replaces /streamlines the Business Hours and Seasons features found in MaxEnterprise. It also provides more functionality (e.g., different hours on different days of the week, and during different seasons) that was previously allowed. • Rate Charts now offer new "day of" hourly rates, "day of flat rates, enhanced rates according to residency, rates according to age, new conditional rates according to event attendance and even new conditional rates according to event duration. Safe to say a few more options than in MaxEnterprise. • Ability to "share" facilities. Now instead of having to always use sub facilities, MaxGalaxy allows you to share facilities if you which. • Facility layouts feature allows users to tie a Layout document to scheduled events (e.g. we need the room setup this way for this particular - event). In addition users can also tie as many use permits (e.g. we need a facility, deposit and alcohol permit for this event). Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other. • Ability to set default # of locker rooms by event type as well as by account. • "Include maintenance in customer's purchased time" by facility (instead of globally). • Ability to include setup and cleanup in event time, or just one or just the other. • Ability to tie individual facilities to a separate A/R accounts if desired. • Specify default event and maintenance durations in hours and /or minutes (not just minutes as found in MaxEnterprise). • Two new "When Events Span Multiple Rates" options = use highest rate, use lowest rate. • In Book Recurring Events a new "custom" booking option (for different times on different days) has been added for more complex schedules. Now you can include locker room assignments while doing these bookings. • Mass Edit gives the new ability to "sort" results by any column on the screen, multi -edit attendance numbers, multi -edit use permits, as well as multi -edit facility layouts. AUV 1 , Everything is Better in the Cloud Activity Registration Improvements The activity registration software has probably been the most enhanced module to date in MaxGalaxy. From a simplified activity setup screen to more options that anyone probably will ever need, this new product is already turning heads to it's complete functionality to not only track registrations, but gives our users ways never seen before to limit or elevate participation amongst groups, communicate with custom email messages and document attachments as much, much more. See below for an overview list of the most notable changes. Activity search: I II M j i -- Add !I Remora j Save Cancel j Adult Group Lesson (202090) Filter v I I Reset Filter Acbvity Name . Cede . General i Requirements Fees I schedula Cammun catiam j Online Reg) E-0— I Staff snrnnment Regerrenreess ... ' Afn Max Enrollees: 20 cm�n .nn: i it MJ ( a� H �• Y _II �'^� -1 Adult Group lesson (202090 _ Age Requiremenb . -- ......... __. _ _ -- ran RDMh. Required: iJ Ninimum Age: 16 I as of I® 10/1/2013 U I�Aat r+a::ot� aoxom sbrtw sbnr . wor. arr w. a+r __ _ 19 /i/i9 I Sf Iss.00 ur i IlY]L20U , Iv� lQ Ftaximum Age: 99 � J as ofI 101U2013 I� Grade Regntren,enss ... _ _ .. .. .. � sbn D. i9 /vz9rs I� 19:05 out irvsvzsu 'rz:od,w ws x.x Required: ❑ j Grades: itbIQOM W Sbn DNe fYlt Time eiM Deb btlT '' i' Gender Gender; jCo-Ed _I Required: L I Hemkenhw Raabenwnt Hemberslw C w: Noldv -il 'dl r•:•kaNl Isbn D.w sbrtT4a _.. -. _. PrereaDlsRa j Wt rrd qe l - - end Time: Edi[ Swim Y+eed 1 i �_I Requitls @ Dore aenrx, sr.us Ixd:•sesmms jumxr er o:ese m94vmx. 9d ow:e e,.ss:ex. is9Nw.wcae,s mms � odmew ..: Dore ww.v.n.9 __�IRI Paa SkWs 9"2 Edit_i s vevmn:b: 1 me r:N smruNUS r e W:g.d m am NxdN.e xee CW rryma NNMd: veynax Sdwlu4 .._.._ —._: Vu' �� xN Deb Y YJDaa �, : Some key new features are: • We now offer four customizable "categories" (e.g., type, season, category, sub- category) to better separate and manage different sessions or seasons. • You can now specify in -house registration dates vs. online registration dates. This allows you to cater to your customers who don't utilize the internet for registration. Otherwise you can limit the number of online registrants for each Activity (e.g. If you have a class of 30, you can give 20 spots for online sign -up, and 10 for walk -in). • MaxGalaxy allows you to setup conditional registration dates as well for priority customers, residency and even membership status as well as the associated automatic fees for each. • Now you can apply automatic discounts /surcharges according to priority, residency, membership status, multi - person registration, and /or multi- activity registrations. • Ability to "require": age, grade, gender, prerequisites, skills, membership status for customizing which customers can sign -up for what activities. • Now you can add a membership and /or multi -use pass to a registration. Meaning the membership or multi -use pass is automatically assigned to the individual in the membership application by simply signing up for a program. • Schedule activities in facilities (like MaxEnterprise) orjust create a list of meeting dates /times which aren't booked out on the gird. • You have the ability to attach documents to activities (e.g. class overview, brochures) as well as attaching hyperlinks to activities (e.g. a webpage that might go over the activity in more detail). • Ability to offer "payment schedules" for both walk -in and /or online registrations. • New pass /fail feature which automatically updates "Skill Levels ". • Email confirmation(s) automatically included in registration process. • Separate Sell Registration vs. Edit Registration screens. �Max�alaxy // Activity Search: I �I Add Remove Save I Cancel Adult .Group Lesson (202090) Fltcr � I Reset Fitter Activity Name . Code Adult Group Lesson 202090 Fees General Fees Item Condition Rule Amount -' Qty Availability Swimming Class Resident Fe, Residency City Resident $45.00 1 Both Swimming Class Non - Resider Residency Non - Resident $56.00 1 Both Fee Search: l /� I Availability: Fee: - .- I X I Package: ) condition: IResddency Rule: iCity Resident Amount: 1 45 J Quantity: �_� I Add I Remove 6iscounts /Surcharges Item Condition Rule P Admin Fee I Residency City Resident Drop -In - Adult Mutt- .Activity 2014 Winter Skating Group Lessons Discount $ Referee Fee Coupon Code Fee Search: (_ Availability: J Fee: }. Pre Fill Days Condition: ResidencY _ ,Coupon Code: ' 1141 Rule:. City Resident Amount: -. -1.9 Discount:;,/, Discount Type:l Percentage Add Remove • Activity Expiration feature — "expire" activities by season, type, category or sub - category. You also have the ability to "un- expire" activities as well. • Improved Deferred Revenue tracking capabilities allows you to better track revenues when the event actually takes place. • Ability to setup email notifications to staff whenever registrations occur. You can also view which staff member sold a registration and which staff members updated a registration. • Ability now to utilize coupon codes (for BOTH internal and /or online registrations) I / I • League Scheduling Improvements Another application getting a major overhaul is the league scheduling application which now enables you to fully manage your leagues from beginning to end. Below is a few of the improvements over MaxEnterprise League Scheduling. League Search: (�I I Add I; Remove Save Cancel Merl's Tuesday Night A League (TUE -A) � Schedule Filter Reset Filter General I Requirements I Fees ) Schedule i Communications Online Enrollees Staff I i League Name . Code Men's Tuesday Nigh I TUE-A Online Display Oates Start Date Start Time End Date End Time View Only 16/1/2014 Ills 12:00 AM 110/1/2014 1,15 12:00 AM fl Allow Online Team Registration: Lr Allow Online Player Registration: IJ Allow Online Free Agent Registration: jJ Free Agent Term: Free Agent Pool - Mens A Teams Free Agents Online Team Registration Dates Start Date Start Time End Date End Time 6/1/2014 S 12 _DD AM 8/30/2014 I° 12:00 AM [onritional Online Team Registration Dates Condition Rule Start Date Start Time End Date End Tir Condition: I 1 Start Date:! _.. Time: '.. Rule: End Date:j Time: Copy Reg Dates from In House Settings i ! Add ... :e Online League Group: Men's Softball II>dl Limit for = of online team registrants: L —I Limit for = of online free agent registrants: 1 1 Orline team enrollment count: Hide enrollment count j online free agent enrollment count: jShow enrollment count Online Team Waiver: IReg Alerts - Registration Info � I( Online Player Waiver: IOnline Waiver - Reg IU Some key new features are: • Now allow customers to setup teams, then it provides them with a team code which they can give the players on their team to sign -up either in -house or online. • New "Team Player" vs. "Free Agent" functionality. This allows you to separate out team registrations vs. player registrations vs. free agent registrations. o Create different custom fields, league descriptions, confirmation notes, receipt notes, waivers, documents, email confirmations and even payment schedules (payment schedules are also an option online). • You can develop conditional registration dates according to priority (e.g. A returning team or player) and residency as well as the associated fees. • Automatic discounts /surcharges according to priority, residency, multi - player and multi - league registrations. • View when staff sells and updates any league registrations by date and time. • Ability to "require ": age, grade, gender, prerequisites and membership status for registration. • Ability to attach documents and hyperlinks to leagues that a participant will receive upon sign -up. • Ability to automatically add a membership /multi -use pass (player pass) to a League Registration. Max axy // Adult - Hockey League (789456) Filter V' Reset Filter communications I Online I Enrollees League Description: Remember meeting your buddies outside for a game of pick -up hockey? Relive that experience by joining a Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board Pond Hockey league! i The Pond Hockey season is five weeks long, played on Lake Nokomis during January and February. League play consists of four -on -four play with no goalies on a 150- by i Teams Players Free Agents In House Team Waiver: ;In House Waiver Team Custom Field Group: (Hockey Registration Team Confirmation Notes: This confirms your team has been registered for the Adult Summer Hockey League. Team Receipt Notes: Please have all team fez's paid prior to the June 1st start date. Any teams with outstanding balanaces will forefit there games until entire balanace is paid in full. Documents /Lino Name . Document/Link Reg Type Activity Waiver Galaxy_Brodiure.pdf Team MaxSolutiors www.maxsolutions.com Team Document Name Reg Type Adivity Waiver "I� (Team Add I I Remove • Email notifications to staff whenever team, player or free agent registrations occur. • Registration dates and waivers can be different versus walk -in and online registrations. • Team Waitlist feature (in addition to Player Waitlist). • Ability to invoice League Events. • Improved Deferred Revenue tracking capabilities. • New League Standings Configuration options including streaks, last 5 games, last 10 Games, division record (vs. Overall record, # of games back and /or win percentage. • Ability to group League Standings "By Division ". • League Schedule screen shows conflicts by Team. O s POS /Inventory Improvements Account Search: Account Name: I General I I x i General Concessions i Retail 1 Items General Program Transaction Registration Burger Hot Dog Schedule Event Membership Sales *ffim it pepsi Drop -In Adult i Drop in Youth Purchases/ i Gift Cards I Skate lnvoices I Rental . 1 i Reprint Last Tabs Recent Front Desk (3) / Carpentier, , Matt Description Qty Unit Price Ext Price French Fries 1 $3.50 $350 __- Pepsi 1 $2.78 $2.78 Drop -In - Adult 2 $9.35 $18.69 Drop -In - Youth 1 $6.07 $6.07 4 i Logout Rltemse Edit REmove Item item Subtotal: — $31.04 Tax: $2.17 Total: $33.21 Purchases/ Invoices Payments: $0.00 Balance. $33.21 Suspend I' Payments Some key new features are: • New cash register layout— Category and subcategory "tabs ". In addition you now have the ability to include images for your POS buttons, making it more clear for staff what item they are selecting. • Pay from a specific account or from a completely different account. • split payment methods with ease. • New tax included feature takes the guesswork out of adjusting the pricing of items so that the tax comes out correct. Now you simply put in the dollar value of the item, click tax included and the software figures out the tax for you. • Exact change feature to eliminate having to enter in the amount the customer gives you. • Item attributes feature (e.g., sizes, colors, brands, etc.). • New item choices feature (e.g., add cheese, pickle, mustard, ketchup, etc.). • Unlimited levels of Item categories /subcategories to better breakout sales. • Reprint last payment receipt /reprint last payment group receipt /reprint last CC receipt— all combined into one "Reprint Last Receipt' button. . • Print receipt /print CC receipt has been combined into one "Print Receipt' button. • Ability to designate which cashiers can begin /end shifts. • Unlimited text lines in POS Receipt Headers and Footers. • Shift Management has improved ability to edit shift totals and shift payment methods. It also allows you to manually add additional payment methods to shifts, as we as keeping manager and cashier totals separate when on the same machine. Everything is Better in the Cloud Membership /Multi -Use Pass Improvements One of the biggest changes MaxEnterprise customers will see is that we now combined MaxEnterprise's Multi -Use Pass and Membership into a single application, which also means a single check -in screen. This greatly reduces staff time and confusion of which screen to enable someone to check into with. We have also add some great new features to speedup the process of selling, assigning and renewing memberships as well. Package Search: LJ r 20 Punch Passll cam. I Filter Reset Fixer l General - Package Name: 20 Pond! Pase - - - --I Package Type: (Adult • I jJ Category: IP:arch Pass _!j LJ Tax Location: I ` U Inv. Location: Gene leMavle baeb AIR Account: I _ • I Copy From Edstmg Start Date: r'I"t'DO/Ya1'i H End Date• 7 — M`O', ' 1122im R pired: Package Details Expiration Type! IOn H_ Uses Durati- IIntervah = / I� Expiration Date: lT'!C`D.' — t5 Mae Uses: 2tl Check In Constraints: I Event Trackingi (Required • i Event Type(s): Complex Limitation: Rxurring Payment Defaults Duration/Interval: minimum Cycles: Default Payment Method: Prorate 1st Recurring Fees: Deferred Revenue (Accrual Accounting) L) Distribute all deferred revenue on the activation date of the member L) Distribute deferred revenue evenly based on the package durationjAr M NOUO¢ Sal¢s Oates Start Date Start Time End Date End Yme �I.I,v rrD'YYY'YIiS �� M1!P!i CAD /YY1Y Some key new features are: j_ Membryp PMriew O:dI V! e:uNe AWo-rntn O SaM s.raar axy IMmd.nl seutlr:l 'UJ jjj rndindwl M.m.: Lx . .. .MUne.nakx Stator: AW:•4d: B•ta: J+SW Tao • .4 T.ne Even[ Ttt evert checked In 9:00 M 0:00 PN league Game Njelle, Nah (Bn _ '. 0:00 PN f:00 Pln ua ue Game NKlie. Nan (O+s >:w m s.aP vN Adr¢ Prw•ama e.n. a.m .:d >:IS PN a:aa PN Gene leMavle baeb >:00 M P.00 PN ua0w Game NjNM. NNt (eas >:00 PM P:00 PN uNw Gash Mjel4, NMt ue lhaa ke¢ A Tft I Frst name urt name gyya} hil a�u I I odd PartidP¢0 I I v'Y i I tLeeklnm qm _ I ; • Ability to view which Staff member sold or updated a membership and the date /time it happened. • Separate Sell Membership and Edit Membership screens • New copy from existing feature for minimizing the time to create similar membership types. • New Renewal feature greatly speeds up the process of people who want to simply continue their current membership. • A more streamlined process for selling multiple memberships than was found in MaxEnterprise. • Ability to designate Coupon Codes (Membership Fees can be automatically applied based on accordingto priority, residency and /or new /renewal status. • Automatic Discounts /Surcharges can be applied based on according to priority, residency and /or membership status. • Ability to "require" Age, Grade, Gender, and /or specific Prerequisites in order to purchase a membership. • Package Setup — ability to "add -on" memberships /multi -use passes to a membership sale • You can attach unlimited documents to membership packages to provide more information on the membership, rules, etc. of the pass. • Sell Membership — ability to prorate recurring membership fees • Email confirmation(s) are automatically included in membership sales process • Ability to designate coupon codes (membership fees can be automatically applied based on according to priority, residency and /or new /renewal status. • Improved deferred revenue tracking capabilities • Removed the periodic maintenance screen — all functions are automatic now • New complex limitation feature. �Mjm Customer Improvements In MaxGalaxy we are moving away from the Company /Family setup that was in MaxEnterprise. Instead now there are just Accounts which can be either. Individuals can be tied to as many accounts as you wish and all of their financials for each are kept separately. In addition we are adding a whole new grouping of functionality to better streamline account and individual maintenance. Account Search: I IU L Add I) Remove Save Cancel Carpentier Family (10()) General Info 1 ccount Info I Scheduling Info 1 Barcode(s) Custom Fields Notes Priority History General Info Account Name: a Family Account Number: 1 100 Account Type: LFamily Account Balance: $3,227.49 J �� Credit Balance: $42.80 Address Info W Address 1: 1 3240 Garfield Ave South Address 2: City: (Minneapolis State: )Minnesota j Zip Code: 55408 Country: JUnited States Residency: iCity Resident Purchase History J I Payment Accounts I t Payment Schedules Registrations I l Memberships I I Leagues I Contact Info Phone: I Add I .I Remove l -- J Home Email: - - - -. -- - -- I Add I Remove Horne Account Contacts Matt Carpentier - Father (Primary) (Billing) I Create New I Mikko Carpentier - Son Select Existing Patti Carpentier I Remove Primary Contact Billing Contact Name: Matt Carpentier Relationship /Position: IFather Some key new features are: • Ability to access account information (purchase history, payment accounts, registrations, memberships, etc.) on the initial customer or account screen for quicker access. • New custom fields feature with the ability to have infinite multiple custom fields by the individual and /or account levels to allow you to track as much information as you want on your customers. • Ability to have multiple phone numbers of the same type (e.g., two cell, two work, etc.) as well as to have multiple Email Addresses (e.g., Home, Work and Other) • New individual attributes feature (replaces positions /titles in the Individual types features • New priority feature (for online facility, registration and membership sales) which provides the ability to specific customers a closer customer service experience. (e.g. Residents or members can sign up 24 hours before. non- residents or non - members). • Ability to tie multiple Barcodes to a single Individual • Use separate barcodes to distinguish between membership vs. multi -Use Pass vs. gft Card, etc. • Or use the same barcode for multiple purposes • Ability to designate Residency (by Individual). Residency is a customizable field with the ability to even build in address segments to determine it in addition to city, state and zip codes. • Ability to have multiple Skill Levels (e.g., Skating Lesson level and Swim Lesson level) • Ability to be tied to multiple Accounts. o Children of divorced families can be tied to both parents making split payments much easier. • Ability to designate "relationship /position" for each account contact. • New "Opt Out" features for mailings and /or emails. - MX Customer Interface Site Improvements The MaxGalaxy customer interface has also gone through a pretty through make -over. Now with even further customizabile CSS interfaces, we have also redesigned many of the screens for a more simpler customer interaction and visual experience. Things such as combining same sessions under group categories, using simple color coding for class availability (green means a person can register) yellow means waitlist, red means closed or full). The biggest thing we are excited about is the new customer management portion, where customers can view past registration history, update their accounts, even pay for any outstanding balanaces they have with you giving our clients more freedom by allowing their customers to do more. /] h1axGalaxy Online Demonstration Site Maxwebsite Downloads Contact Us R7axGalaxy Client Portal Demo Search Actidibes: O Gal ► Adult Programs ► Adult Sports ► Youth Programs ► Special Events Adult Swimming (Adult 16 +1 (Adult 16 +)Fis navertoo late to eViore the bentits otswimmingl This class assists adults ofvaded swimming amities to feel wmfortatde and confldentin the w'aterwtliie buflding life -long sFdlls_ Fitness Swimming _ Jump In. The equagce progrs You'll find adul( fitness swim d classes, lifeguard certification, S I rM Name Punch.. ow 0 ..Apuon Far—In the Ppol ',12JU^_Otl Eaa,ee_; i%s+1 cam:, Flne.s Nthe P001 :ffls7M: A.161dw01 FSn6991n the N.1 :tilfl_' :due6l.ImN ter FOne53 IW il.i. eaaleA.ca:+p i.>terGN) ' YsL.01a A... l_M[run !,lair Fa.mer.l �21n— Hmtl- -5191412:15 PM- I:ISVM In ]. Dale Invoice Nlmlber 7lydl. w 13 Alnlwnt "id Faun[. pen^01i ELI MIS S00± 11: s t M.beGgmrn: 51475 51969 55996 59 Cb- 3 l.1a'ae GS�mn•.1 5'375 w00 513'53 !,lair Fa.mer.l 51590 5006 31900 1500T 3 'n!a'<e Gay�nrn; 9151.50 50 0] 515150 15750 _ 3 I Alnte himent 5153. 3001 SISS.i '!5700 S I M0111 -1 A—M P.M B in[0 Al z SIO 5000 SION -'CO S >'�ie Gaymer. 3n7/SOF1 5100700 • Ability to for customers to make payments toward account on anything outstanding they owe (purchases, invoices, memberships, statements). • Ability to use HTML "tags" in the notes /waivers feature for online sign -ups. • Ability for customers to view account history.. • New rotator groups functionality for home page to highlight programs, bookings, league sign -ups and more. • New information pop -up window with additional facility and activity and details to create less clutter. Max // Online Facility Reservation From Dais: (7/AMU I Lou Through Date: (7t31 ,-14. _....__........ ! L9 Time Between: 6:00 A 0 And: f090PM _ -__1 Q Days: M Tu W Th F Sa Su FatilltyType: j AN items checked Complex - I All items checked.. i Factlily: A0 items checked Amenities: Camping-Near Showers —1 NHL S¢e Seats 500 I Search I You must be logged in to reserveirequest a facility: Create Account I Login Thursday, July 31, 2014 Start Tune End Time DurationCompin Facility Rate Type Rate 3:00 Pod. 4:CG PIJ fG Ice Centre Rink - Blue wHourly 50.00 Rtsene 3:00 PIA 4:00 P1.1 ED Ire Centre Rink -Greco ,. Hourly 50.00 Reserve 4:00 PIA 5:00 P1.1 E0 Ice Centre Rink -Blue Hourly sa.60 Reserve 4:00 PIP! 5:00 P61 60 Ice Centre Rink - Green ye Hourly 50.00 Reserve s00 PIA 5:00 PI.t 60 la Centre Rink - Red y Hourly 50.00 Rtsen•e SAID PIA 6:00 Pk1 ED Ire Centre Rink- Blue y+ Hourly SOHO Restrre 5:00 Po.1 6:00 Pkl. 60 Ice Centre Rink -Green y Hourly 50.00 P.tserve 5:00 PIA 6:00 Phi 60 Ice Centre Rink - Red � Hourly 50.00 R. ere 6:00 Po.1 7:00 PIA 60 Im Centre Rmk - Blue y. Hourly SC.00 � P,esen•e 6:00 P61 7.00 PU 60 ke Centre Rink - Green w Hourly 50.00 Rt:erve 6:00 PIA 7:00 PU E0 Ice Centre Rink - Red V Hourly 50.00 P.estn•e 7:00 PLI C.00 Phl E0 Ice Centre Rink - Blue y Hourly $0.00 ; Reserve 7:00 Po.1 6:00 Pkt 60 Im Centre Rink - Green .y.. Hourly .50.00 Reserve 7:00 P4 690 Pil 60 Ice Centre Rick- Red -yi Hourly $0.00 I Reserve This application got a major overhaul versus its MaxEnterprise counterpart. We simplified the process of your customers going online and reserving facilities online. In addition we now offer a whole new group of features to allow our users to tailor what they want to offer for online bookings and how they want to do it. Some key new features are: • Ability to offer a variety of "overlapping" available time blocks (e.g., hourly and half day and half day blocks). • Ability to offer optional other charges (designated by Facility). • Ability to specify "day of rates (hourly or flat). • Ability to specify a default online event type (but also allows selection of others). • Ability to use HTML tags in online waiver feature for a custom look. • Ability to include setup and /or cleanup maintenance time in event time. • Ability to specify conditional online reservation dates according to priority, residency or membership group. • Online search functionality allows any combination of facility type, complex, facility and /or amenities. • Online reservation displays "reserve" or "request" or "call' (if no rate chart exists internally) by facility. • Online reservation displays unlimited search results based on the criteria the user enters. F. Everything is Better in the Cloud Campsite Booking Improvements Campgmndi Campground-MaxGalaxy __ • 30 Amp ElecMclWater Hock -up Check -In Date: 7!2212034 175 .50 Amp dectduWaker Hook -up Check -Out Date: 7!25/2014 15 Amenities: .) . Campercabi'n .?eat A flusuc Sire Campsite 63 Camp Hnst In MaxGalaxy's online booking software we made the process much simpler for customer to quickly find a site, add any items they might need (e.g. electric hook -up, firewood, etc.) and whether that site is available. We now also allow internal users to be able to do the same type of booking without having to use the customer interface. You design and designate map coordinates of your campsite locations based on the map you upload, a visual map on screen shows if sites are available (users /staff can search by amenities as well if they are booking online or in- house. A few other cool new features: Some key new features are: • Full integration with our Point of Sale and Inventory Module. • New Campsite "check -in" and "check -out" feature for tracking guests. • "Hover" capability over campground map (both internally and online). Internal Hover displays complete reservation details (for unavailable sites) or amenity information (for available sites). Online Hover displays amenity information (for available sites). SPlayground © Water selected C,mpsites Account Search: II I Showe,R. troom Building Account Name: Ll Contact:I .l Campground Campsite , Check -In - Check - Campground -M Campsite 61 7/27/2014 7/25/77 To Sinker Beach .ierpark Other Charge: M1; O.GB 2?) Remove I Book Ev ' - Available., - Unavailable (Event Conflict) - Unavailable (Attribute Conflict) - Checked in ✓�\ Campsite 63 Camp Hnst In MaxGalaxy's online booking software we made the process much simpler for customer to quickly find a site, add any items they might need (e.g. electric hook -up, firewood, etc.) and whether that site is available. We now also allow internal users to be able to do the same type of booking without having to use the customer interface. You design and designate map coordinates of your campsite locations based on the map you upload, a visual map on screen shows if sites are available (users /staff can search by amenities as well if they are booking online or in- house. A few other cool new features: Some key new features are: • Full integration with our Point of Sale and Inventory Module. • New Campsite "check -in" and "check -out" feature for tracking guests. • "Hover" capability over campground map (both internally and online). Internal Hover displays complete reservation details (for unavailable sites) or amenity information (for available sites). Online Hover displays amenity information (for available sites). Everything is Better in the Cloud Online Program and League (NEW) Registration Improvements Se"Ac&Mes: _ ......... -- .._. Adult Swimming 9:15 ALI Carvell CC Pool t%^-NI.16.i rAdur 16•) it is nmfW are to esplore lee aen6a c MWThis 4'ss uslsta acute MlxCad s.,n^lq aiNices le feal RASAN nndcRable and m1.15,11M n the late-11 -lding W-long s ala. IN= 14 9 Aduh Fmgra.:a --.—.---___......______.._—_.___..—____._..__.....__._._._.._ 1�4Put cattle eaaaa Tiers ............._....._____._ Oars Laolb Spods IAdafarvuC laaaai 201Va :, 10.19- 1]ulaati e3ii -vel Au Talw Ce.L4CG y Vo ! ulh Ptoglami IAbtOrap lwrn 2a2C90 iMAala- 1lnIR➢N 11'J A- 1115. T,n CaNrel Ct y ! Special Eema AW arar urn iGOed Iblfi2+A_1M1nata 1—AU- 1115122 Tale ea—ce V 8'30 AN !Sv✓n -AW Oreap-EauYal SAA- X19_+2 aneata- b1]RaU t`a AU -1P.1a A4 TAT - rAatmcc v Fitness Swimming 8:30 AM 9:15 AM central CC Peal J—ph. Tho aqualics pro —nis at CaAc offal W.n, nertise and peRa crhanu.e tMthe cki., Y1arm wmJgR C wrua4t cpoa�s 8:70 AU Y.115nd aeuRiMexx..Wm Van- aerators'a dse nasses.7ulden'a smm.^ug lessons. aq_CdMIdii clea.x prc -Halal arH 10202014 d�s— lifeguard cfirft ten. CPR and AEC aineig and aWaCC pam nal aal. -g. er.15 AI.1 Cenel CC PoOI 'itlMlr Rune COY Oaln lyres aq. Lenera 9:15 AU 1bsaOn W.ee....— ... 9n21a- 1LS14!pK 1:op na -ACOtL Krri CaN a Y 930 AI.1 1AaYaon irnaeAa Poel 2010w 1b1.ia"t. —Q0U Ro AY-f9C AY awl —I= Y 1 f111QOti �Aryatn ?traaM1N PoW 20:.12 l 4314- +2112014 l Rl -SPoRI e.lY.! CartutC �i MaxGalaxy Online Registration has been retooled for a much simpler and easy process than it was for customer to sign -up in MaxEnterprise. From a completely re- designed customer interface as well as group activities to "Online Activity Groups" in order to streamline CI Site display. You can even order online activity groups in any manner you choose. The new customer Interface also allows Customers to view past registration and /or purchase history and even allows them to pay any outstanding transaction they might have from a walk -in purchase or invoice. Please select a league registration option. Register a Team Join a Team Register lndlvldual Aduk Group Lesson (201932) Oates: 1011T2013 - 12131r2013 Description (Adw If +) it 4 as rer too late t0 ev ve the ben8b of-- gwfrm Mg! fiis CIM 6541514 adults of t9ksd SOimmfrg abrt,'es:wev Combrtableand conrderetin Me ttaWnNne btl46rg tit "otg sWls Online Registration Dates: 1M2014 12:00 All - 1281201412:00 A2d 11112'201412 :DO AA3 - 11117,014 &00-ALI (Cdy Pes•d✓a0 Currently Enrolled: 14 Limit for if of Online Registrants: 10 Reg imments: film Age: 16 yls (as of 10112014) Max Age: 99 yrs (as of 10112014) Grader. Co -Ed Prerequisites: Swim Level 1 stall. Camenger, Man Additional Information: Program Overview PDF Schedule: Dy_ Date son Time End Time Facility 10/2/2014 $1111 AD 9:15 ALI Carvell CC Pool 10/7/2014 830 AM RASAN Central CC Pool IN= 14 930 Ali 9:15 AM Central CC Pool tor1412014 830 AV 9:15 AG Central CC Per, 1011E'a a a30 AM 915 AM Centel CC P.1 1012/7014 8'30 AN 9:15 ALI Central CC Pcol 102X014 8:30 AM 9:15 AM central CC Peal 102912014 8:70 AU 9:15 AU central CC Pcal 10202014 630 AM er.15 AI.1 Cenel CC PoOI f1/4Q01i 830 AN 9:15 AU Centel CC Feel 11&2014 930 AI.1 9:15 A1.1 Cenlnl CC Pool 1 f111QOti 8:30 All l i5 AIA Cenral CC Pea 11/112014 8:30 A1.1 9:75 AI.1 Cenral CCPe.l IIIRVJn I4 RID All '"A AN C-1 rr.. Pmt 11/2012014 910 AM 9 :1s_AM! Ce1Nal CC Pool 11125Q014 8:30 ALI 9:15 AN Cenral CC POO 11272014 9:30 AI.i 9:15 ALI CMIr*CC Pact 72/2,2014 8:30 AM 9:15 ALI Centel CC Peru 12/42014 830 AM 9:15 AM Cenral CC Pcdl 12AQ014 830 AL! 9:15 ALI Cem !CC FOOT 12/112014 8:30 ALI 9:15 AM central CC Pool 12JI62014 830 AM 9:15 ALI Central CC P.1 211 12J1 &7014 8:30 AI.1 9:75 AI.1 C. PaoI 12123/2013 830 Aid 9:15 A14 CenW CC PoOI 12125/2014 3-0 AM 9:15 Au Carlini CC Pool Registration Information Name of Registrant: Nal Carpentier Should we contact you to aid In helping vrith your I Yes, Please Cord. disability ?: Are there any medical conditions that we should be aware or: Please select from the following= y9nite/Cauasian Would you like to be on our weekly e-mail list?: 1 HEREBY RELEASE AM HOLD HARI.ALESS WITH RESPECT TO ANY AND ALL IPUURY, DISABILITY, DEATH, or loss or damage to person or property, WHETHER CAUSED BY IJEGUGEt4CE OR OTHERWISE, the following named persons or entities, herein referred to as Carpentier Family. Mal Carpentier rr i � • Web Reporting Improvements • Direct link provided from setup screen to each web report displayed online (for previewing) • League Schedule report provides direct links to Team Schedules • League Schedule report is completely customizable (show /hide 12 different columns of information) Thursday, August 07, 2014 Start Time Complex Facility Visitor pill Home Pts Event Type ;6:00 PH 88 Complex Ft Taco Belk Eagles Game PM Be Complex F2 Le" Tasty Pia Game 16:00 6:00 PM BB Complex F3 Wings Rob's Bombers Game 1:00 PM B3 Complex F1 Taco Bellx Rob's Bombers Game 7:00 PM BB Complex F2 Eagles LeOys Game 7:00 PM 88 Complex F3 Tasty Pizza Wings Game 8:130 PM BB Comple:< Fl Hard Hitters Brushers Game 8:00 PM B8 Complex: F2 The Swatters 'Scho0lers Game 8:00 Phi BB Complex F3 The Wild Wlsons Bats Game 9:00 PM 88 Complex Fl Hard Hitters ers Wd sons Bats Game 9.00 PM BB Complex F2 Brushers The Swatters Game 1.9:00 PM BB Complex F3 Schaders The Wild Game Thursday, August 14, 2014 'Start Time Complex Facility 16:00 PM BB Complex Ft 6:00 PM BB Complex F2 6:00 Pi.1 BB Complex F3 7:00 PM 05 Complex Fl 7:00 Phi BB Complex F2 7:00 PM Be Complex F3 8:00 PM BB Complex Ft 6:00 PM BB Complex F2 6:00 PM Be Complex F3 : 9.00 PM BB Complex F1 9:00 PM BO Complex F2 990 PM Be Complex F3 VisROr Eagles Tasty Pizza The Swatters Brushers Tasty Pizza Rob's Bombers The Wild LeOys Wings Taco Belk Lefty. Schoolers Pts Home Pts Event Type Hard Hitters Game Men's Monday B American Tesm W -L T OTL SOL GP Pis Pd L5 L10 STRK RF RA Div GB Bailers 3 1 2 0 a 6. 8 0.667. 2 -1 -0 3 -1-0 W1 27 18 1 -0 -0 Broadway Pizza 0 3 2 0 0 5 2 0200 :. 0J-0 0-3-0 T1 9 22 0.1 -0 25 Hard Hitters 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0-0-0 040 - 0 0 041-0 1 Leftys 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 1 0.000 0-0-0 040-0 00 G." 1 National Team W L T OTL SOL GP Pis Pct L5 1.10 STRK RF RA OW GB Wilsons Bats 3 2 0 0 0 5 6 0.600 3-2.0 3 -2-0 Li 26 20 1 -2-0 Richards Bar 3 1 2 0 0 6 8 0667 2 -1-0 3-1 -0 L1 18 17 3-0-0 AS Minnesota Twins 2 3 0 1 1 6 5 0.333 2 -3-0 2 -3.1 W1 19 22 1 -2 -1 1 Brushers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.000 0 -0 -0 ! 040-0 - 0 0 0-0-0 0.5 � a low Digital Signage Improvements (formerly MaxVideo Link in MaxEnterprise) Whers Happening Today Support Our Local Sponsors upcoming oven" • Ability to play sound, music, etc. • Ability to display flash objects (.swf files) • Unlimited number of Panels on each template • No restrictions on shapes and sizes of panels on each template • Slideshow capability • Different animation types for slideshows • Ability to manually "drag /scroll through" items displayed onscreen (for touchscreen monitors) • Ability to completely customize the schedule display appearance (using CSS) • HTML text editor — to display rich text without having to use HTML tags �- M �ximum �� rrt acar Inc The Experts in Recreation Menag -nl Saflw , Name: City of Edina Parks and Recreation Location: Edina, MN MaxGalaxy Price Proposal Customer: Susan Faus / Nick Lovejoy Date: 12/2912014 Phone: 952- 826 -0367 Valid Thru: 312912015 Email: sfaus@ edinamn .gov /nlovejoy @ci.edina.mn.us Special Notes or Comments: MaxGalaxy cloud based software is a monthly subscription service. Unless Specified, Maximum Solutions requires new customers to sign and pay 12 months of hosting fees upfront. Initial Setup and Configuration Costs Price Setup and Configuration of MaxGalaxy Core System for up to 8 locations. One new Install. Current Client Discount (Customer is licensed for half the modules now) $8,350.00 ($3,750.00) Total Initial Setup and Configuration Costs $4,600.00 Application Module(s) and Monthly Costs Monthly costs Include software, data storage, bandwidth usage, redundant back -ups, periodic software updates, unlimited technical support. Monthly costs are prepaid on a 12 month basis unless otherwise noted. Concurrent Users Needed Monthly Costs Hosted Core Applications Include: Facility Scheduling 35-40 $400.00 Program Registration 25 -30 $325.00 Point of Sale & Inventory 20 -25 $300.00 Membership Management 15 -20 $205.00 League Scheduling 5 -10 $150.00 Additional Applications Include: Comments and Notes: General Ledger Exporting $70.00 Website Calendar Integration $60.00 Digital Display $50.00 Credit Card Processing Requires a payment gateway, see additional items below $0.00 Customer Web Portal: Online Account Management /Payments — $0.00 Online Facility Bookings $70.00 Online Program Registration — $70.00 Online League Registration $60.00 Online Membership Management — $60.00 Total Monthly Costs $1,820.00 Confidential Pricing Document from Maximum Solutions Inc. 12/29/2014 Page 1 Maximum Tre EzPOrfs in Re <r.•clio r, flur.agemanf Sot Name: City of Edina Parks and Recreation Location: Edina, MN MaxGalaxy Price Proposal Customer: Susan Faus / Nick Lovejoy Date: 12/29/2014 Phone: 952- 826 -0367 Valid Thru: 312912015 Email: sfaus@ edinamn .gov /nlovejoy @ci.edina.mn.us Special Notes or Comments: MaxGalaxy cloud based software is a monthly subscription service. Unless Specified, Maximum Solutions requires new customers to sign and pay 12 months of hosting fees upfront. Training Costs Training Costs Setup and Configuration of MaxGalaxy Core System for up to 7 locations. $8,250.00 Expected onsite training costs: none 10 Local Client 1 •If onsite, the client Is responsible for the travel costs (hotel, car, airfare, etc.) that apply. Summary & Budgeting Total Training Costs $8,250.00 Additional Items Qty Price Extended Price t For Credit Card Processing: Payl al, Authorize.Net, etc. We recommend Element Payments Credit Card Processing 1 Estimated Summary & Budgeting Gateway - 100% PCI Compliant ' Monthly Costs Per Year (12 Monthy Prepay) $25 /month Monthly Support and Hosting Cost $1,820.00 z For Storing EFT Information: A PASS account for storing credit cards in a 100% PCI Compliant environment. 1 Estimated ° Total Additional Charges (to date) $0.00 Total Software, Services, Training, etc. $15 /month Yearly Cost Total Investment Since Start Above pricing is with keeping your current credit card processor. If you do hosting services with Element Payments (Global $56,530.00 Payments in Canada) they will waive these monthly costs. You can also take in -house credit card payments as well, just simply add $78,370.00 a PCI compliant swipe device: $99.00 + $10 s /h. $100,210.00 3 Required Computer Hardware: For inhouse credit card payments, a Magtek ]PAD SC. Security 1 Estimated $300 /each TBD encrypted by our gateway vendor of choice. Cost include encryption charge. Pin pad and has options in place for upcoming PIN debit move so hardware won't have to be repurchased in 2015. Total Additional Costs $0.00 Confidential Pricing Document from Maximum Solutions Inc. 12/29/2014 Page 2 Total Investment Summary & Breakdown Total Setup and Configuration Costs $4,600.00 Summary & Budgeting ' Monthly Costs Per Year (12 Monthy Prepay) $21,840.00 Monthly Support and Hosting Cost $1,820.00 3 Total Training Costs $8,250.00 Yearly Prepay on Monthly Cost: $21,840.00 ° Total Additional Charges (to date) $0.00 Total Software, Services, Training, etc. $34,690.00 Yearly Cost Total Investment Since Start Year 2: $21,840.00 $56,530.00 Year 3: $21,840.00 $78,370.00 Year 4: $21,840.00 $100,210.00 Confidential Pricing Document from Maximum Solutions Inc. 12/29/2014 Page 2 Costs Broke Down by Location Maximum .5i�(ufia�ts ltrc. • llvr[�ypay ai rtvcr!wTrn rinrxgy�ntnntjr Ufiwn�65rx.: 77Jn General Information Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Location 4 Location 5 Location 6 Location 7 OVERALL TOTAL Location Name Braemar Arena Sports Dome Art Center Parks and Rec Edinborough Park Aquatic Center Centennial Park OVERALL TOTAL Upfront Costs $500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $500.00 $675.00 $675.00 $750.00 $4,600.00 Training Costs $650.00 $1,750.00 $1,650.00 $650.00 $900.00 $900.00 $1,750.00 $300.00 Membership Management not needed not needed 55.00 not needed 75.00 75.00 not needed $8,250.00 LOCATION BREAKDOWN TOTAL $1,150.00 $2,500.00 $2,400.00 1 $1,150.00 $1,575.00 , . , . not needed MONTHLY COSTS Braemar Arena Sports Dome Art Cetnter Parks and Rec Edinborough Park Aquatic Center Centennial Park OVERALL TOTAL Facility Scheduling 65.00 60.00 40.OD 65.00 60.00 60.00 50.00 $400.00 Program Registration 50.00 50.00 45.00 75.00 60.00 0.00 45.00 $325.00 Point of Sale & Inventory 30.00 30.00 20.00 not needed 60.00 100.00 60.00 $300.00 Membership Management not needed not needed 55.00 not needed 75.00 75.00 not needed $205.00 League Scheduling 45.00 45.00 not needed 60.00 not needed not needed not needed $150.00 Employee Time Clock - Available early 2015 not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed not needed $0.00 Integrated Credit Card Processing no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge $0.00 General Ledger Exporting 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Digital Display 20.00 10.00 10.00 not needed 10.00 not needed not needed $50.00 Website Calendar Integration 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 1D.00 not needed $60.00 League Standings, Scores, etc, no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge no charge $0.00 Online Bookings and Requests 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Online Program Registrations 10.00 10.00 10.D0 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 $70.00 Online League /Team Registrations 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 not needed not needed not needed $60.00 Online Membership Sales not needed not needed 20.00 not needed 20.00 20.00 not needed $60.00 LOCATION BREAKDOWN TOTAL $265.00 $250.00 $245.00 $255.00 $325.00 $295.00 $185.00 $1,820.00 12 Month Payment Total $3,180.00 $3,000.00 $2,940.00 $3,060.00 $3,900.00 $3,540.00 $2,220.00 $21,840.00 What each location should pay: Seasonal Adjustments 12 Month Payment Total $3,398.00 $1,534.00 $3,158.00 $3,278.00 $4,118.00 $3,758.00 $2,438.00 $21,682.00 A Confidential Document by Maximum Solutions Inc. Facility Breakdown To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV. G. The Recommended Bid is From: Tim Barnes City Facility ManagerTfZ 0 Within Budget ED Not Within Budget Date: 02/17/15 Subject: Request For Purchase —KMC Total Control HVAC Control System, Multiple Sites Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 02/05/2015 Company: Harris Controls Recommended Quote or Bid: Harris Controls General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: 03/05/2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $28,998.00 This purchase is for the purpose of centralizing the HVAC controls of the Edina City Hall, and Police facilities, The Edina Public Works, and The South Metro Training Facility. This would provide a centralized HVAC controls program that would be accessible via the Edina Intranet. This would eliminate the need for a dedicated server at each Facility. It would increase the monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities of the staff. This would enable them to operate in a more concise fashion when making critical energy and repair decisions. This purchase is funded through the Environmental Efficiency Fund. These controls are proprietary and the only source to purchase the modules is from Harris Controls. There is an additional cost from the original estimate for $6,543.00 that will be covered from the Energy and Efficiency Fund. This cost is to solve a poor communication link between our Florida Heat Pump Brand of Heat Pumps at Public Works. The Heat Pumps have an internal Control that has been sending out nuisance alarms which will be corrected with this purchase. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Date: February 17, 2015 ANA, o e v,-,� v 0 cof less Agenda Item #: IV. H. The Recommended Bid is ❑X Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid - Contract ENG 15 -2 West 50th Street Bridge Scour Repairs Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 10, 2015 Company: Blackstone Contractors, LLC G. F. Jedlicki, Inc. Sunram Construction, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Blackstone Contractors, LLC General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: April 10, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $53,192.00 $61,785.00 $77,850.00 $53,192.00 Minnehaha Creek experienced extensive flooding and high flows from approximately May to August 2014. The high flows at the West 50th Street bridge structure caused scour to occur at the north abutment wing walls and exposed the footing foundation elements through the structure. In addition, there was significant erosion of material from the east side of the creek bank between the 50th Street and Browndale Avenue bridges. Despite the needed repairs, the bridge is structurally sound and is not a safety concern for the traveling public. This project will repair the scour damage by casting a concrete foundation beneath the exposed wing wall foundation. The eroded material from the eastern creek bank will be replaced with engineered backfill and turf to re- establish the eastern bank. Material eroded from the bridge footings on the internal bridge channel will be restored to protect the bridge footings from future high stream flow events. Additionally, improvements will be made to both sides of the channel back by installing boulder walls along both sides of the bridge inlets and boulder vanes will be installed at the upstream and downstream ends of the bridge to reduce stream flow energy and reduce future erosion. Funding for the project will come from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Public Works' bridge maintenance funds. FEMA awarded $36,031.50 to the project through Disaster DR- 4182 -MN. The engineers estimate for this project was $105,400. Staff recommends awarding the project to Blackstone Contractors, LLC. It is anticipated that this work would occur late February or early March. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Attachment: FEMA Letter GAI' MCENTRAL SVGS \ENG DMPROJECTS\CONTRACTS\2015 \ENG 15 -2 50th St Bridge Repair1BR10 50th St Bridge Scour Repair\ADMIN \MISC \Item IV. H.. ENG 15 -2 RFP.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Page 2 Of PUe��cs9m Homeland Security and Emergency Management QeQ���Nt o 445 Milmesota Street. Suite 223 • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -6223 Phone: 651.201.7400 • Fax: 651.296.0459 o sf�TFES Of MINN http: / /hsem.dps.mn.gov January 9, 2015 Alcohol Dave Goergen, Public Works Coordinator RZ�� and Gambling Enforcement EDINA ,0V of al BuApprehension 7450 Metro Boulevard JAN / 6 2015 Edina, MN 55439 C17y0F P6�� /� R 11 SA Driver andvehicle Disaster: DR- 4182 -MN Services PA ID: 053 - 18188 -00 Emergency Project Worksheet: 480 Communication Networks Homeland Dear Dave Goergen: Security and Emergency Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has notified Homeland Security and Emergency Management Management (HSEM) that they awarded the enclosed project worksheet to EDINA. The award Minnesota amount is $36,031.50 (federal share $27,023.63, state share $9,007.87). State Patrol Upon review of this project's status, we will process an initial payment. Office of Communications Enclosed are a P4 Project Completion and Certificate form and its guidance. Please review these Office of documents, if your project(s) are complete, fill out the P4, sign and return. This will complete the Justice Programs application process if no other documentation is required. Office of Pipeline Safety Please be sure to review all of the information in this award letter along with all the attachments and Office of exhibits which define your financial responsibilities, requirements and compliance as a sub - grantee. Traffic Safety I hope this information is helpful. If you have questions about this letter please contact me at State Fire Marshal (651) 201 -7426 or pamela.ruble@state.mn.us. Sincerely, amela J. Rubl Applicant Services Coordinator HSEMP' Enclosures: Project Worksheet • PA Project Completion and Certification Report and Guidance *Time Extension Request Form and Guidance # Exhibits I -III and • Exhibit 11 Guidance Legal Authorities: Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended, CFDA number 97.036 # FEMA -State Agreement FEMA 4182 -DR + Minnesota Statutes 2014, section 12.221, subdivision 6, and section 12A.15, subdivision 1 • Minnesota Executive Order 13 -13 Assigning Emergency Responsibilities to State Agencies, Section 2011 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Q e >1 0 v •'Y�nRPO� ,�F,9 • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. I. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -26 Approving No Parking on Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -26 approving parking restrictions on Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive; and on Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road to Hilary Lane. Information / Background: Council authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids for the reconstruction of Valley View Road at the Oct. 21 City Council meeting. The project limits are McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace, and Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road to Hilary Lane. With the improvements, Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard will not have adequate width for parking and because they are designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways and we are expending MSA funds for reconstruction, a no parking resolution is required. As you may recall, staff received authorization to request a variance from MSA to allow the continued operation of the 20 miles per hour horizontal curve at Comanche Court. The MSA Variance Committee met in December and the request was approved. Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 2015 -26 approving parking restrictions on Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard. Attachment: Resolution No. 2015 -26 G.TMENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS\2015 \ENG 15 -1 Valley View Rd \BA377 VV Rd fir McCauley- Braemar(Hairpin)\ADMIN \MISC \Item IV. I. Res. No 2015 -26 - No Parking.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOI FOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON STATE AID PROJECT NO. 120 - 151 -016 VALLEY VIEW ROAD FROM MCCAULEY TRAIL TO MARK TERRACE DRIVE AND BRAEMAR BOULEVARD FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO HILARY LANE WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned improvements for Valley View Road (MSAS 151) from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive; and Braemar Boulevard (MSAS 138) from Valley View Road to Hilary Lane; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvements on Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard; and WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain restrictions; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby ban the parking of motor vehicles on Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive; and Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road to Hilary Lane, at all times. ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 7, 2015 w91�,1� Oe ""=' . tl� mao Agenda Item #: IV. J. Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 7, 2015. Action x❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the January 7, 2015Traffic Safety Committee Report at their January 15 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: • Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 7, 2015 • Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of January 15, 2015 G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports \2015 \Item IV. J. Traffic Safety Report of January 7, 2015.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN SS424 Traffic Safety Report Wednesday, January 07, 2015 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on January 07. The City Engineer, Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator, and a Police Lieutenant were in attendance for this meeting. The Assistant City Planner was also consulted on the issues. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the January 15 Edina Transportation Commission and the February 17 City Council agenda. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends approval Al. Request for a reduction of speeds on Malibu Drive at Malibu Drive, a street name placard for the intersection, and a renaming of the street This request comes from a resident of Malibu Drive, south of the intersection where Malibu Drive starts to branch off into three separate cul -de -sacs, all named Malibu Drive. The requestor is concerned with speeds on Malibu Drive, believing that high speeds at the intersection and nearby hill lead to a dangerous roadway. The requestor also asks for a nameplate for Malibu Drive in order for visitors, deliveries, and school buses to find the homes in the southern cul -de -sac easier. Finally, the requestor asks that the cul -de -sac be renamed. As a numbered nameplate would not feel neighborly, and requested that the city look into a new name for the entire cul -de -sac to clarify confusion. Map: Malibu Drive at Malibu Drive After review, staff recommends placing of a street name placard to signify the house numbers within this cul -de -sac, as well as other cul -de -sacs on Malibu drive which are not a continuation of the main road. This decision was based on guidance from Public Safety and the difficulty to find some addresses in this area. Staff will advise the requestor to bring to City Council a petition to change the street name if they wish. In regards to the speeding in this area, the attempted speed counts failed due to weather and low traffic conditions, but the police do seasonally enforce this area and a speed study of this area will be conducted in the spring to more efficiently enforce speeds. 11 Page A2. Request for signage to make clear that the parking bay on 501h, west of Wooddale, is not a right turn lane for eastbound traffic This request comes from a resident who drives 501h street often. The concern is that in low light, drivers begin a merge into the parking bay west of the intersection with Wooddale, and when they recognize that the lane does not continue until the intersection the drivers will swerve back into the right lane. The requestor would like some signage or painted curb which would reflect back to drivers to signify that this is not a driving lane. Currently there is a concrete gutter - pan between the parking bay and the driving lane, signifying this is not a typical roadway segment. There is no reflector or other sign to signify the end of the parking bay. A video study was performed, and this procedure was observed, however only one half of the drivers who infringe on the parking lane turned right at the intersection. This indicated the issue is more likely due to people simply drifting into the lane. An appropriate sign would be from the object marker (OM) series, either a class 2 or class 3 marker to signify the end of the parking bay. Type 2 Object A?arkers 0"21V 0t.12 -2V Oh.4111 Orv12 -2ii Type 3 Object Markers Not, CM K c'nsc o?A-3R Image : Type 2 and 3 Object Markers After review, staff recommends approval of this request. Staff recommends placement of a OM -311 object marker to signify the end of the parking bay. While this may not prevent all of these encroachments from occurring, it has the ability to warn drivers sooner than current conditions. 21 Page A3. Request for further safety enhancements to the 501h and France midblock pedestrian crossings This request comes from the business association at 501h and France, noting the ineffectiveness of the continuous flashers along 50th St. and the signed only crosswalks along 49Th ! St. On 501h Street, the east crossing was observed, with less than two gaps per five minutes in the typical peak hour. Most westbound traffic yielded to pedestrians waiting to cross, or in the crosswalk. On 49 "' %2 St. there were 4.5 gaps in the typical five minute segment. Both of these meet warrants for improvement to actuated pedestrian signals. In addition, on 50th Street, the street light immediately before the east crossing obstructs the current flashers with a place- making banner. 501h St. is considered an augmenter arterial in the city's 2008 Comprehensive Plan (an A level arterial), which according to the City's sidewalk policy would require some sort of signalization for installation of a crosswalk. Research has shown that continuous flashers do not increase long term pedestrian safety, as drivers grow accustomed to their presence. Pedestrian actuated flashers have higher rates of yielding as they are not flashing except when drivers are expected to yield. The city's crosswalk policy is located in Appendix B. Photo : 1/2 Photo and France area, current crosswalk on 50 '' Note the beacon is obstructed by the light. beacons are marked with lightning, and the intersection of 50`h and France is circled. 31 Page After review, staff recommends a split approval of this request. Staff recommends that pedestrian push- button actuation and Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacons be placed on the two crossings on 50th Street. Further study is needed on how many beacons can be placed in close proximity, and if all of the three crosswalks that are starred in the image above meet the warrants for pedestrian actuation. Thus the crosswalks on 49th %2 St. will be an item on a future report, and are not recommended for approval here. A4. Request for handicapped parking restriction in front of 3100 60th Street (60th Street at Xerxes) This request comes from a resident who is concerned at the frequency with which the stairs to her house are blocked by disabled vehicles. This concern stems from the requestor's daughter having a disability, and the steps being the only reliably safe way for her to access the house (alley gets icy and is harder to keep clear than the front walk). Therefore, the requestor asked for the implementation of a handicapped parking zone, such that a school bus front door could line up with her steps, facilitating her daughter's movements to and from schooi . area for the parking restriction is circled Photo : Stairs which should be left clear for schoolbuses and other handicapped accessible vehicles After review, staff recommends approval, installing the signs in this location in the spring. 41 Page Section B : Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends denial B1. Request for a "No Right Turn on Red" restriction on Cecelia Circle/ Delaney Boulevard at 78th Street After review, staff noted that the volume and timing of the light at Cahill were larger detriments to the area than right turns on red at Cecelia Cir., and thus recommends denial of this request. However, staff is working with City of Bloomington staff to change the signal timing to alleviate this problem. B2. Request for roadway expansion on 701h Street, at Highway 100 This request comes from a parishioner at the church in the northeast corner of this intersection. The requestor believes that at peak hours, as well as after church functions most of the traffic that is westbound is trying to turn onto Highway 100 northbound, and thus the roadway should be expanded to accommodate a right- turn -only lane. A study of the intersection from 8 AM to 6 PM, found that during morning peak hours, it is not unusual for more vehicles to be turning right than going straight at this intersection. The study also found that this behavior of traffic does not continue past the noon hour, with significantly more through traffic than right turns in the , if 1 u ._I i I Map: location of the proposed turn lane. 51 Page afternoon and evening. Overall 42 percent of all traffic in this location was turning right. The current layout of the approach has one through lane and one shared lane for through and right turning traffic. After review, staff recommends denial of this request based on the fact that the queue of vehicles typically clears during the signal phase. n C : Items which staff recommended for further st C1. Request for pedestrian actuation for the pedestrian crossing at Chapel Lane and Valley View Road This request comes from a resident who is concerned for safety during morning hours as school enters session. The concern is that left turning vehicles from westbound Valley View Road to southbound Chapel Lane obstruct the views of children crossing the street. When investigated, a person in the crosswalk was unable to be seen by drivers while they were at the required stopping sight distance, for approximately the central third of the roadway. Mop: Valley View Road and Chapel Lane After review, staff recommended further study of this issue. Observations for this report were unable to observe several crossings due to the severe cold, or precipitation. A video study and gap analysis is recommended to be performed when the weather is warmer. C2. Request for removal of the crosswalk on 50th Street at Eden Avenue This request comes from a resident, who lives in the Grandview Area. The requestor states that the crosswalk that is present in this location is inadequate for safety of pedestrians. The crosswalk is marked with special, brick style, pavement markings and static signs. The crosswalk does not meet the Crosswalk Policy, as the policy states that crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads unless in conjunction with signalization, and the 2008 Comprehensive Plan for the city has 50th St. labeled as an Augmenter Arterial (A -minor arterial). There are two crashes in this location within the last five years, but neither was an accident type that would indicate a pedestrian was involved. The city's crosswalk policy is located in Appendix B. Photo : Crosswalk at 50 "' and Eden the lower left corner of the map. After review, staff recommends further study (a full gap analysis) to ensure that the area met warrants for the addition of an actuated signal. Section D: Other Traffic Safety Issues Handled D1 : Requestor called in that the new development at Grove and Tracy fails to meet required sight distances. Staff investigated the area and found that a redevelopment had improved the sight lines, and despite the sight lines being inadequate, the property was not in violation of the clear view portions of the City Code. D2 : Requestor was concerned with cut - through traffic on Malibu Drive. During the discussion it was determined that the request was not safety - related. Thus this request was removed by the Traffic Safety Coordinator, and the resident was informed of this decision. D3 : A potential tenant of the retail development at 77th and Metro Blvd. wished for recent traffic counts in the area, counts from 2013 were available and were provided. D4 : Requestor believed that 50th and France's signal could be retimed with left turn arrows, despite there not being left turn lanes, to reduce delay in the intersection. This request was forwarded to Minneapolis which controls the signal. D5 : Requestor has recently noted that actuation of left turn signals along county roads in the Southdale area were not working, this request was forwarded to Hennepin County, which control the signals. 71 Page Appendix A: Graphs of the Correlation between Acceptable Gaps for Left Turns and Other Factors 8 7 6 CL 5 M w oA 4 0 3 2 1 0 0 Gaps vs Green Turns Y = - 0.0227x + 2.9437 ® R = 0.0091 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 # of turns This graph displays the number of acceptable left turn gaps from the driveway (per 5 minute interval) vs the number of people who turn onto 78th Street from Cecilia. Gaps Vs. Right on Red Turns 8 y = 0.1118x + 1.8235 R = 0.0402 7 6 a5 bD 4 0 3 2 N N 1 N N 0 0 5 10 15 20 # of turns This graph displays the number of acceptable left turn gaps from the driveway (per 5 minute interval) vs the number of turns on red from Cecelia. 81 Page Gaps vs Total Turns 8 7 ♦ y = - 0.0022x + 2.7105 6 ♦ R = 9E -05 CL M �4 ♦M 0 sc 3 2 NN N 1 ♦ ♦ ♦N 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 # of turns This graph displays the number of acceptable left turn gaps from the driveway (per 5 minute interval) vs the number of turns from the driveway. 5 4.5 4 3.5 a 3 M w 2.5 0 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 375 Gaps vs Volume e y=- 0.014x +9.6313 M ♦ R = 0.3685 425 475 525 575 Vehicles per 15 minutes (not from video, from counter data) This graph displays the number of acceptable left turn gaps from the driveway (per 15 minute interval) vs the volume of vehicles carried on 78th street. 91 Page Appendix B : Crosswalk Policy Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time ". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: 1) More than five gaps — pavement marking and signage only. 2) Four to five gaps — add activated pedestal mounted flasher. 3) Less than three gaps — add activated overhead mounted flasher. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: 1) Routes to schools 2) Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. 3) Locations adjacent to public parks. 4) Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street. 5) Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. 101 Page MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 15, 2015 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Nelson, Rummel, Spanhake and Whited. ABSENT Campbell, Olson APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by chair Bass and seconded by member LaForce to table Item VI. D. Edina Challenge: Transportation Subcommittee for a future meeting and approve the amended meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF December 18,201 Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Spanhake to approve the amended minutes of December 18, 2014. All voted aye. Motion carried. Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 7, 2015 A.1 In the recommendation, change 'resolution' to 'petition.' A.4. "Blocked by disabled vehicle" means broken down vehicles. Is this an enforcement issue since vehicles are to park a certain distance from intersection? What is the policy for posting handicap zone? There isn't a written policy; it is handled on a case -by -case basis in one of two ways — handicap parking only or no parking /loading zone. 3.1. Will the traffic light at Cahill be retimed? Yes, staff is coordinating with City of Bloomington for an extra 16 seconds and vill observe result. B.2. Change 'land' to 'lane.' C.1. With someone directing traffic the gap study is affected; uncomfortable area to cross so looking at it in a traditional way may not help with analysis; hope there will be an opportunity to look at traffic if school referendum passes so should they wait until then? Staff discussed waiting and acknowledged that the flashing beacon will not work with a crossing guard; school buses and other traffic frequently exit out the marked inbound only entrance. C.2. Agree that the current crosswalk does not meet City policy. D. At what point does the City decide to contact Hennepin County about retiming of traffic signal lights? Usually on a case - by -case basis. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Spanhake to forward the edited Jan. 7, 2015, report to the City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. Updates Student Members — None. Bike Edina Workine Grou Member Janovy said they discussed their focus for 2015 and three main areas of interest are bike parking; evaluation of existing on -road facilities, and increasing their presence at community events. Livine Streets Workine Grou Planner Nolan said two public meetings are planned to share the draft Living Streets Plan with residents and gather feedback. Scheduled meetings are Wed., Feb. 4, 7 p.m. at Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, 7450 Metro Blvd; and 1r� o e Cn lss8 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. K. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject• Resolution No. 2015 -23 Cooperative Agreement with City of Bloomington for . Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project, Improvement No. BA -431 Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2015 -23 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to sign attached cooperative agreement with the City of Bloomington for Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project from Johnson Avenue to Edinborough Way. Information / Background: The City of Bloomington approached us last fall to discuss the opportunity to partner on a maintenance project along Minnesota Drive. Minnesota Drive from Johnson Avenue to approximately 0. 17 miles east of France Avenue is a shared municipal state aid route between the two cities. The remaining length of Minnesota Drive to Edinborough Way is entirely the responsibility of Edina. The timing of this could not be more perfect as our maintenance staff was considering completing some pavement maintenance work in 2015. The cooperative agreement details the responsibilities of each party in regards to the project. Edina's portion will be funded by a combination of state aid, utility and potentially PACS funds. The City of Bloomington's City Council approved this agreement at their Feb. 2nd City Council meeting. Staff recommends approval of this resolution and the cooperative agreement. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015 -23 Cooperative Agreement City of Bloomington's Resolution 2015 -14 G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA431 MN Dr M &O _77th- Edinborough\ADMIN \MISC\Item IV. K. Cooperative Agreement-docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -23 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND CITY OF BLOOMINGTON COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE MINNESOTA DRIVE STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT FROM JOHNSON AVENUE TO EDINBOROUGH WAY WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has initiated roadway improvements for Minnesota Drive; and WHEREAS, a portion of the project is within the City limits of both the City of Edina and the City of Bloomington; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the City of Edina hereby approves the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Edina and the City of Bloomington for the Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project, BA -431: ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON FOR THE MINNESOTA DRIVE STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Edina ") and the CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Bloomington "), with the parties collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Cities ". WHEREAS, the Cities desire to implement the design and construction of the Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project, which is part of the City of Bloomington 2015 -102 PMP Street Maintenance Project, in the cities (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power; and WHEREAS, Bloomington has prepared a cost estimate for the Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project, labeled Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Bloomington will prepare plans and specifications for the Project consistent with Municipal State Aid and Cities design standards. Bloomington must obtain Edina's concurrence with the plans and specifications. 2. BIDDING. Bloomington will advertise for bids for the construction of the Project in accordance with Minnesota Law and will provide Edina with an analysis of the bids received. Bloomington must obtain Edina's concurrence with the award of the bid to a contractor. 3. CONTRACT AWARD. Bloomington shall prepare contract documents and enter into a contract with the approved bidder. 4. COST ALLOCATION. Relevant construction costs shall be paid per the following, adjusted per final construction costs. The estimated cost of the agreement is 1 $620,000. Bloomington and Edina shall conduct a 50150 split of the costs for all roadway, driveway, and sidewalk construction costs along Minnesota Drive from Johnson Avenue to France Avenue and from France Avenue to approximately 0. 17 miles east, not associated with utility and signal improvement costs. Edina shall be responsible for all roadway, driveway and sidewalk construction costs for the remainder of Minnesota Drive from approximately 0. 17 miles east of France Avenue to Edinborough Way. Items include aggregate base materials, bituminous pavement, bituminous milling, concrete pavement, concrete curb and gutter, concrete aprons, concrete sidewalks, and boulevard restoration. Project costs include: engineering, inspection, testing and construction costs. Utility and signal improvement costs will be paid by the agency in which corporate limits the utility or signal lies. 5. OWNERSHIP. Each party shall own the portion of the Project located within its corporate boundaries. 6. PAYMENT. Bloomington will act as the paying agent for all payments to the Contractor. Payments will be made as the Project work progresses and when certified by Bloomington City Engineer. Bloomington, in turn, will bill Edina for the project costs. Upon presentation of an itemized claim by one agency to the other, the receiving agency shall reimburse the invoicing agency for its share of the costs incurred under this agreement within 30 days from the presentation of the claim. If any portion of an itemized claim is questioned by the receiving agency, the remainder of the claim shall be promptly paid, and accompanied by a written explanation of the amounts in question. Payment of any amounts in dispute will be made following good faith negotiation and documentation of actual costs incurred in carrying out the work. 7. CHANGE ORDERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. Any change orders or supplemental agreements that affect the project cost payable by Edina and changes to the plans must be approved by Edina prior to execution of work. 8. RULES AND REGULATIONS. Bloomington shall abide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules and contract administration procedures. 9. INDEMNIFICATION. Bloomington agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edina against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Bloomington and /or those of Bloomington employees or agents. Edina agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Bloomington against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising under the provisions of this Agreement for which Edina is responsible, including future operation and maintenance of facilities owned by Edina and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Edina 2 and/or those of Edina's employees or agents. All parties to this agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law; Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothing in this agreement shall be ` construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. 10. WAIVER. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by Bloomington shall not be considered employees of Edina for any purpose, including Worker's Compensation, or any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third parry as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Bloomington employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of Edina. The opposite situation shall also apply: Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by Edina shall not be considered employees of Bloomington for any purpose, including Worker's Compensation, or any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Edina employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of Bloomington. 11. AUDITS. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Edina and Bloomington relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by Edina, Bloomington, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. Edina and Bloomington agree to maintain these records for a period of seven years from the date of performance of all services covered under this agreement. 12. INTEGRATION. The entire and integrated agreement of the parties contained in this Agreement shall supersede all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements between Edina and Bloomington regarding the Project; whether written or oral. 13. FUTURE MAINTENANCE. The parties responsibilities for ongoing future maintenance of the Project area are as follows: • Roadway maintenance shall be completed by the respective City. • Storm sewer shall be maintained by the respective City. • Sanitary sewer system shall be maintained by the respective City. • Watermain systems shall be maintained by the respective City. 3 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officials. CITY OF BL OMINGTON BY: f—e4�4 Its Mayor AND _ City Manager A _ ItsvQjy Attorney 0 CITY OF EDINA BY: Its Mayor AND Its City Manager AND Its City Attorney Total Project Cost (0.47 miles) $620,412.15 Total Shared Project Cost (0.40 miles) $527,350.33 Exhibit A Mn Drive Street Maintenance Proiect Cost Estimate Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Extension Remove Curb & Gutter LinFt 1748 $ 6.10 $ 10,662.80 Remove Concrete Walk SgYd 493 $ 12.30 $ 6,063.90 Remove Bituminous Pavement SgYd 236 $ 6.50 $ 1,534.00 Sawing Concrete Pavement LinFt 636 $ 3.70 $ 2,353.20 Sawing Bit Pavement LinFt 497 $ 2.70 $ 1,341.90 Common Excavation CuYcl 79 $ 24.00 $ 1,896.00 Granular Borrow CuYcl 79 $ 20.00 $ 1,580.00 Select Topsoil Borrow CuYcl 155 $ 42.00 $ 6,526.80 Aggregate Base Class 5 Ton 38 $ 21.00 $ 798.00 Aggregate Base (CV) Class 5 Special CuYcl 3963 $ 3.20 $ 12,681.60 Aggregate Base Class 5 (100% Crush) Ton 34 $ 29.00 $ 986.00 Full Depth Reclamation SgYd 17833 $ 1.00 $ 17,833.00 Mill Bituminous Surface SgYd 17833 $ 1.80 $ 32,099.40 Bituminous SPNW Ton 32 $ 70.00 $ 2,240.00 Bituminous SPWE Ton 4016 $ 62.00 $ 248,992.00 Bituminous SPWE Dwy Ton 32 $ 165.00 $ 5,280.00 Tack Gallon 1566 $ 3.30 $ 5,167.80 Adjust MH, GV, Curb Stop Each 16 $ 320.00 $ 5,120.00 Revise Irrigation Each 6 $ 250.00 $ 1,500.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 Lin Ft 1748 $ 16.10 $ 28,142.80 4" Concrete Walk SgFt 6500 $ 4.60 $ 29,900.00 8" Concrete Walk SgFt 710 $ 6.30 $ 4,473.00 Standard CB Each 1 $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 Reconstruct CB Each 4 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 RCP Storm Pipe Lin Ft 10 $ 45.00 $ 450.00 Internal MH Chim Seal Each 6 $ 285.00 $ 1,710.00 Truncated Domes SgFt 216 $ 44.00 $ 9,504.00 Traffic Control Lump Sum 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 Revise Signal System System 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 Inlet Protection Each 20 $ 190.00 $ 3,800.00 Sod / Seeding SgYd 1400 $ 8.50 $ 11,900.00 Striping /Signing Lump Sum 1 $ 7,000.00 $ 7,000.00 Subtotal: $ 500,736.20 Contingency (S% Project Cost) $25,035.81 Total Construction Cost Estimate $525,773.01 Engineering / Admin / Legal / Finance (18.0% Project Cost) $94,639.14 Total Project Cost $620,412.15 Total Project Cost (0.47 miles) $620,412.15 Total Shared Project Cost (0.40 miles) $527,350.33 RESOLUTION No. 2015- 14 A RESOLUTION APPROVING CITY OF BLOOMINGTON AND CITY OF EDINA COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE MINNESOTA DRIVE STREET MAINTENANCE PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bloomington is the official governing body of the City of Bloomington; WHEREAS, the Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project will be part of the 2015 PMP Street Maintenance Project (City Project 2015 -102); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bloomington on the 8"' day of September 2014 and the 2 °d day of February 2015 acknowledged the streets for inclusion in the 2015 PMP Street Maintenance Project (City Project 2015 -102); and WHEREAS, a portion of Minnesota Drive is within the City limits of both the City of Bloomington and the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington portion of the project is anticipated to be funded by a combination of state aid funds and various utility and road improvement funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BLOOMINGTON THAT; 1. The City of Bloomington is authorized to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Edina for the Minnesota Drive Street Maintenance Project. Passed and adopted this 2 °6 day of February At t: � k &' S.— Secretary to the Council C, CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA Resolution Number 2015 -14 The attached resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Bloomington on February 2, 2015. r-� The question was on the adoption of the resolution, and there were 1 YEAS and 0 NAYS as follows: COUNCILMEMBERS: YEA Gene Winstead Cynthia Bemis Abrams Jack Baloga Tim Busse Andrew Carlson Dwayne Lowman Jon Oleson I✓ RESOLUTION ADOPTED. NAY OTHER A TEST: Secretary to the Council To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL o e may° • i.�ConA ��� • Agenda Item #: IV. L. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action Z Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Release of Public Improvements and Special Assessment Agreements Action Requested: Authorize Mayor and City Clerk to approve attached Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements for sanitary sewer and water services upgrades for the 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project areas. Information / Background: Some residents were required and some were encouraged to upgrade their sanitary sewer and water service lines during the 2013 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction. The costs were added to their special assessment by signing a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement. Each agreement was recorded with Hennepin County as a lien against each property. Since these special assessments were levied in 2014, there is no need to continue with the lien against each property. By removing all the liens now, we avoid delaying closings and refinances on these properties when the liens are discovered in a title search. Attachments: Release of Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements WFMCENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS \2013 \ENG 13 -2 Normandale\SS474 Normandale\ADMIN\MISC \Lien Releases \Feb 17, 2015 Lien Releases \Item IV. L. Release of Public Improvements.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Michael S. Dobies and Ellen S. Dobies, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 10, 2012, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on August 20, 2013, as Document No. A09996469 over property legally described as West Y2 of Lot, as measured along the North and South lines thereof, Block 18, Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); B. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Gail P. Huwe, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 1, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984859 over property legally described as Exhibit A, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as 171816vl the "Special Assessment Agreement "); C. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Reid R. Thompson and Carli Augustine- Thompson, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 17, 2012, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984879 over property legally described as Westerly 122.94 feet of Lot 3, Block 17 Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); D. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Mark C. Fretland and Cindy K. Fretland, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 14, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 14, 2013, as Document No. A09984877 over property legally described as West %Z of Lot 3, Block 14, Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); E. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Robert J. Have, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 7, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, as Document No. A09984876 over property legally described as Lot 8, Block 1, Replat of Block 9, Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); F. The City has received payment of the special assessments in full for the Special Assessment Agreements identified in Recitals A through E. 171816A 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The Special Assessment Agreements filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder as listed in Recitals A through E are hereby released. Dated: CITY OF EDINA STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17d' day of February, 2015, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite #317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 AMP /cjh 171816v1 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Allen C. Johnson, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 13, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984878 over property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Normandale Addition - Miller Replat, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); B. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Joseph S. Carpenter and Kara L. Carpenter, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 30, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984880 over property legally described as Lot 1, lying 171816v1 West of the East 100 feet thereof, Block 17, Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); C. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Leonard J. Gaer and Audre L. Gaer, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 23, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 14, 2013, as Document No. A09984860 over property legally described as Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); D. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and William E. Togstad II and Ruth m. Togstad, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 1, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984856 over property legally described as Lot 19, Block 2, Lake Edina Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); E. The City has received payment of the special assessments in full for the Special Assessment Agreements identified in Recitals A through D. 171s16vl 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The Special Assessment Agreements filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder as listed in Recitals A through D are hereby released. Dated: AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of February, 2015, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite #317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 AMP /cjh 171s16vl 3 EXHIBIT A The North 81 feet of the East %2 of Lot 2, Block 15, Normandale, according to the duly recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 171816v1 4 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Kathleen A. Amlaw, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated June 5, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984858 over property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Edina Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); B. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Allan W. Giese and Lori Giese, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 9, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder on July 24, 2013, as Document No. A09984857 over property legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, Lake Edina Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment 171816v1 Agreement'); C. The City has received payment of the special assessments in full for the Special Assessment Agreements identified in Recitals A through B. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The Special Assessment Agreements filed for record with the Hennepin County Recorder as listed in Recitals A through B are hereby released. Dated: CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17"' day of February, 2015, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite #317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 AMP /cjh 171816v1 2 EXHIBIT A The North 81 feet of the East %2 of Lot 2, Block 15, Normandale, according to the duly recorded plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 171816vi 3 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and J. J. Maley and Luella E. Maley, Trustees Under The Maley Living Trust, Dated September 2, 2003, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 6, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101356 over property legally described as West V2 of Lot 2, Block 14, Normandale, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); B. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Lillian C. Carteng, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 10, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101359 over property legally described as East Y2 of Lot 1, Block 15, Normandale, 171816v1 Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement'); C. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Marc F. Donnelly and Jennie E. Donnelly, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 26, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101248 over property legally described as Lot 7, Block 1, Elm View 1St Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement'); D. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Jason Peterson and Elisabeth Peterson, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 30, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101251 over property legally described as Lot 20, Block 4, Lake Edina 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement'); E. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Steven Curry and Leslie Curry, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 1, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101249 over property legally described as Lot 4, Block 4, Lake Edina 4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement'); F. The City has received payment of the special assessments in full for the Special Assessment Agreements identified in Recitals A and E. 171816v1 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The Special Assessment Agreements filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as listed in Recitals A and E are hereby released. Dated: CITY OF EDINA ".QED STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of February, 2015, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite #317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 AMP /cjh - 171816v1 (Reserved for Recording Data) RELEASE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENTS RECITALS: A. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Timothy P. Gibbs and Kristin M. Gibbs, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated April 29, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101360 over property legally described as Lot 11, Block 1, Lake Edina 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); B. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Richard J. Raming Jr. and Ginna L. Raming, a single person, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated May 29, 2013, and filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101361 over property legally described as Lot 11, i7tsl6vl Block 3, Lake Edina 2 "d Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement"); C. The City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Judith K. Rieckhoff, as Trustee of the Judith K. Rieckhoff Revocable Trust Under Agreement Dated June 13, 2007, as Amended, (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owners ") entered into a Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement dated June 25, 2013, and fled for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 2013, as Document No. T05101250 over property legally described as Lot 4, Block 3, Lake Edina 2 °d Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the "Special Assessment Agreement "); D. The City has received payment of the special assessments in full for the Special Assessment Agreements identified in Recitals A and C. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: The Special Assessment Agreements filed for record with the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as listed in Recitals A and C are hereby released. Dated: CITY OF EDINA James Hovland, Mayor AND Debra Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) 171s16v1 2 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17t` day of February, 2015, by James Hovland and Debra Mangen, respectively the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell Knutson Professional Association 1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 4317 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 AMP /cjh 17isi6vi To: Mayor and Council From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works EEO Date: 02/17/2015 Subject: 2015 Ford F250 2WD Pickup — Public Works - Utilities k Ce D;' � • ', ��i >RPCIRA��O • IHHH Agenda Item #: IV. M The Recommended Bid is © Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: 02/10/2015 03/10/2015 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Midway Ford $31,558.00 ABM Equipment Recommended Quote or Bid: Midway Ford commercial state contract #85051 ABM Equipment state contract #84870 General Information: This is for the replacement of Vehicle 70 -287 which is a 2005 Chevrolet 1500 with 105,533 road miles which is 10 years old and in need of replacement. We analyze the age, usage, type of service, reliability, condition and repair costs associated with operation of each vehicle in the fleet. This particular vehicle has a vehicle score of 27 and our scoring model recommends replacing sedans and light trucks at a score of 23. e r U) O iaaa Agenda Item #: IV. N The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: 2015 Vaccon jetter vac truck mounted on a Western Star truck chassis. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 02/11/2015 Company: ABM Equipment Boyer Ford Trucks Recommended Quote or Bid: ABM Equipment, state contract # 74584 Boyer ford Trucks, state contract # 77960 Bid or Expiration Date: 03/11/2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $269,393.75 General Information: This is for the replacement of Vehicle 70 -338 which is a 2003 Vactor with sewer jetter and vacuum equipment mounted on a Sterling Chassis. It has 94,578 miles and 5528 engine hours, is heavily used, 12 years old and in need of replacement. We analyze the age, usage, type of service, reliability, condition and repair costs associated with operation of each vehicle in the fleet. This particular vehicle has a vehicle score of 32 and our scoring model recommends replacing heavy duty trucks (gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,500 Ibs) at a score of 28. From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -24 Initiating Termination of Water Service �y C >RPOR� IAAA t Item M IV. O. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt resolution 2015 -24 to start the process of disconnecting water service at 7075/7079 Amundson Avenue. Information / Background: The business located at 7075/7079 Amundson Avenue filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on January 9, 2015. The business consumes a very large amount of City water, with a quarterly bill that averages over $30,000. The City has continued to deliver water to the business while the bankruptcy case is ongoing, but the City has a legal right to request assurances that the business can pay for that continuing water use. The City requested assurance of payment in the form of a deposit equal to the average of the past six quarterly bills ($32,721). To date the City has received neither the requested deposit nor a response from the business. Therefore, City staff recommends proceeding to the next step of terminating the water service to the business. City code requires Council to approve the attached resolution to initiate the termination process. If Council approves this resolution, the next step City staff will take will be to notify the business of the pending termination. The business will have 10 days to file a formal written appeal with the City Clerk to be heard by the City Council at a future meeting. If the business does not wish to appeal to the City Council, the final termination decision will be made by staff. Attachment: Resolution No. 2015 -24 Initiating Termination of Water Service City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-24 RESOLUTION INITIATING TERMINATION OF WATER SERVICE Whereas, the City has a contractual agreement with Waldorf Nevens Cleaners ( "Debtor ") to provide water service to the property located at 7075 /7079 Amundson Avenue, Edina, MN 55439 ( "Subject Property"). Whereas, Debtor filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota, on January 9, 2015. Whereas, the City has continued to provide water service to the Subject Property following the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Whereas, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §366, a utility provider may discontinue utility service if a debtor does not provide the utility with adequate assurance of payment for continuing utility service that is satisfactory to the utility within 30 days. Whereas, the City contacted Debtor's attorney by letter dated February 3, 2015, requesting assurance of payment in the form of a deposit equal to the average quarterly water bill. Whereas, the City has not received any assurance of payment from Debtor or its trustee within the 30 days following filing of the bankruptcy petition. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City staff is authorized to initiate the termination of water service to the Subject Property. Passed and adopted by the City Council on February 17, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 180237v1 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 -826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-24 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015. City Clerk 180237v1 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Eric Roggeman, Finance Director Date: February 17, 2015 A, �?f I \ 1 0 �aeu Agenda Item #: IV. O. Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -24 Initiating Termination of Water Service Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt resolution 2015 -24 to start the process of disconnecting water service at 7075/7079 Amundson Avenue. Information / Background: The business located at 7075/7079 Amundson Avenue filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on January 9, 2015. The business consumes a very large amount of City water, with a quarterly bill that averages over $30,000. The City has continued to deliver water to the business while the bankruptcy case is ongoing, but the City has a legal right to request assurances that the business can pay for that continuing water use. The City requested assurance of payment in the form of a deposit equal to the average of the past six quarterly bills ($32,721). To date the City has received neither the requested deposit nor a response from the business. Therefore, City staff recommends proceeding to the next step of terminating the water service to the business. City code requires Council to approve the attached resolution to initiate the termination process. If Council approves this resolution, the next step City staff will take will be to notify the business of the pending termination. The business will have 10 days to file a formal written appeal with the City Clerk to be heard by the City Council at a future meeting. If the business does not wish to appeal to the City Council, the final termination decision will be made by staff. Attachment: Resolution No. 2015 -24 Initiating Termination of Water Service City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-24 RESOLUTION INITIATING TERMINATION OF WATER SERVICE Whereas, the City has a contractual agreement with Waldorf Nevens Cleaners ( "Debtor ") to provide water service to the property located at 7075 /7079 Amundson Avenue, Edina, MN 55439 ( "Subject Property"). Whereas, Debtor filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota, on January 9, 2015. Whereas, the City has continued to provide water service to the Subject Property following the filing of the bankruptcy petition. Whereas, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §366, a utility provider may discontinue utility service if a debtor does not provide the utility with adequate assurance of payment for continuing utility service that is satisfactory to the utility within 30 days. Whereas, the City contacted Debtor's attorney by letter dated February 3, 2015, requesting assurance of payment in the form of a deposit equal to the average quarterly water bill. Whereas, the City has not received any assurance of payment from Debtor or its trustee within the 30 days following filing of the bankruptcy petition. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City staff is authorized to initiate the termination of water service to the Subject Property. Passed and adopted by the City Council on February 17, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 180237v1 4801 West 50th Street . Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-24 Page 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015. City Clerk 180237v1 To: Mayor and City Council From: David Nelson, Chief of Police Date: February 17, 2015 w91A,1� 0 e Cl) �y • ,�roRPOP�`��O • 19e8 Agenda Item #: IV. P. Action ❑X Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -25 Authorizing MOU Accepting Funding From Department of justice Funding For Financial Task Force Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -25 authorizing the acceptance of the Memorandum of Understanding designating $42,250.00 from the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) to fund the Edina Police Department's participation in the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force and it role in federal case #2013R00386. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Edina Police Department has been involved in several major Federal financial crime investigations while participating in the Financial Crimes Task Force. Although the funding for this position ended on June 30th, 2014, the role Officer Joel Moore plays in the prosecution of these cases is instrumental. The State of Minnesota fully funded Officer Moore's salary and benefits for January and February of 2015. The USAO has agreed to fund the next four months (March 1St, 2015 - June 30th, 2015) covering salary and benefits. The USAO will make one lump sum payment to the City of Edina for $45,250.00 to cover these costs. This will work in conjunction with the State of Minnesota's funding so the City of Edina will be fully reimbursed. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2015 -25 Memorandum of Understanding City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -25 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FROM UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department is a member of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force; and WHEREAS, the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) has offered, through a Memorandum of Understanding, the City of Edina $42,250.00 to fund Officer Joel Moore from March 1st 2015 — June 30th 2015 as reimbursement for his work with the Minnesota Crimes Task Force. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina has authorized the City of Edina to receive funds from the USAO for their participation with the Minnesota Crimes Task Force. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager and Mayor are authorized to execute any necessary agreements relating to the acceptance of these funds from the USAO. Adopted this 17th day of February 2015. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 17, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk , + r U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney District of Minnesota 600 United States Courthouse Telephone: (612) 664 -5600 300 South Fourth Street Fax: (612) 664 -5787 Minneapolis, MN 55415 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Regarding the temporary reimbursable detail assignment of Joel Moore, Police Officer, City of Edina, Minnesota and Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force Member to the United States Attorney's Office District of Minnesota This Memorandum sets forth the agreement between the City of Edina, Minnesota, ( "City ") and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Minnesota ( "USAO ") regarding a temporary reimbursable detail assignment to be served by Joel Moore ( "Moore "), a police officer employed by the City and a member of the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force, from March 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015. During this detail assignment, the following terms and conditions apply: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this detail assignment is to address the need for investigation of a pending federal criminal case being handled by the USAO, United States v. Gaye, et al., 14 -CR -344 (JRT /FLN), USAO #2013R00386. Moore is the lead agent in the case and will be assigned to work exclusively on the case during the duration of this reimbursable detail. 2. Location. The detail work shall be performed by Moore in the USAO in Minneapolis. 3. Duration. The duration of the detail shall be from March 1, 2015 through June 30, 2015 for a total of 40 hours per work week. No overtime compensation shall be paid by the USAO. 4. Continued Employment. Moore shall continue to be employed and supervised by the City and in all respects shall remain an employee of the City during this reimbursable detail. 5. Reimbursement. On or before March 1, 2015, the USAO shall make one lump -sum payment to the City in the amount of $45,250 to reimburse the City for the detail assignment of Moore. No other payments shall be made for this detail. The City will continue to pay the salary and benefits of Moore during this detail assignment. In the case that Moore is unable to perform the work for the duration of the detail, the City shall return the remaining pro rata amount to the USAO. 6. Time and Attendance. Moore's salary and benefits will continue to be processed by the City. During the duration of the reimbursable detail, Moore shall report to the USAO in Minneapolis. 7. Travel. No detail- related travel is anticipated and travel related expenses will not be paid by the USAO during the detail. 8. Termination. This agreement will terminate on June 30, 2015. 9. Modification, No deviations from this memorandum will be authorized without the express written approval of the parties. 10. Attachment. Attached to this Memorandum of Understanding is the Multi- Agency Joint Powers Agreement between the City and the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension relating to the Minnesota Financial Crimes Task Force. In working on this reimbursable detail Moore shall adhere to the Joint Powers Agreement and the Standards detailed therein. H. Approvals: CITY OF EDINA Mayor City Manager Police Chief UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Date Date Date Andrew M. Luger Date City Of Edina Mid - Decade Analysis of Housing And Population Dick Carlstrom Consulting Geographer November, 2014 Table Of Contents Introduction 1 Key Findings 1 Methodology 2 Analysis by Quadrant Areas and Census Block Groups 2 Housing Stock 5 Value and Age Of Single Family Housing 6 The Role of Housing Age 10 Households with Births 10 Annual Death Statistics 16 Households with School Age Children 16 Households Age 55+ 26 Sales of Single Family Homes 37 Sales of Single Family Homes and Change in Population of School Age Children 43 Construction of New Single Family Homes 45 Mid - Decade Analysis of Housing and Population Introduction This report details the findings of a study of the housing stock and population of the City of Edina with emphasis upon the geographic and demographic patterns within the city and the dynamic forces of home sales and new home construc- tion. The specific objective of this study is to seek answers to the following questions: What are the significant differences in the demographic characteristics of Edina's neighborhoods? Q What are the patterns in the city of age and value of single family homes? Q What role does age and value of single family homes play with respect to distribution and density of births, Q families with school age children and age 55+ households? What is the distribution and density of births throughout the city? What is the per -unit yield of school age children in the single - family housing in the district? What is the density and distribution of the age 55+ households in the city? What is the current level of homes sales within the district? What is the impact of homes sales on the number of families with school -age children in the city? Q What are the patterns of new home construction in the city? Q Does new home construction increase the number of households with school age children? Key findings Households with School Age Children: Households with school age children occupy 30% of the single family homes in the city. Households Age 55 +: Fifty percent of the single family homes in the city have households with residents age 55+ Q Births: The Minnesota Department of Health reports that in the year 2013 there were 486 births in the city. Q Deaths: The Minnesota Department of Health reports that 458 city residents died in 2013. Housing Stock: The city contains a wide variety of housing types including 12,539 single family homes, 3,856 condominium units, and 5,080 apartments. Age of Single Family Homes: Sixty percent of the single family homes in the city were built prior to 1960, eleven percent have been built since the year 1980. Residential Pattern of Households with School Age Children: Eighty -eight percent of the school age children in the city live in single family homes. Eight percent reside in multi- family units. 1 Yields of School Age Children in Single Family Homes: The single family homes in the city yield 0.53 children of school age per unit. This is considerably higher than other first ring suburban communities. F1 Residential Pattern of Households Age 55 +: The highest concentrations of older single family households are located in the younger neighborhoods in the western areas of the city. Q Home Sales: Between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2014, 1,948 single family homes were sold. This is 16% of all the single family units in the city. Yield of School Age Children in Homes Sold: The postsale yield of school age children in the homes sold was 0.58 students per home. This is higher than the city -wide presale yield of 0.53 students per home indicating that ales of single family homes in the city result in an increase in the number of school age children. F1 New Home Construction: During the period between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2014, 267 permits were issued for construction of new single family homes. Geography of New Home Construction: The highest concentrations of the new homes are in the Northeast quadrant of the city. Methodology Demographic and geographic data were obtained from the Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield school districts, Minnesota Department of Health, Hennepin County geographic Information System, Edina City Assessor, Edina City Building Depart ment, and Excensus LLC. From these data sources, characteristics of housing units, demography and households were extracted and synthesized using geographic information system (GIS) technology. This GIS software is used to overlay housing and residential characteristics onto a digital geographic model of the city. From this, statistics can then be devel oped regarding housing type, and the distribution and density of demographic groups. This report contains considerable data and analysis regarding households with school age children. The data source used in this work was addresses of K -12 students enrolled in the public school districts located in whole or part within the city. The Edina, Hopkins and Richfield district shared this address data with the city. Strict precautions were followed so as to assure privacy for this data. This data is obviously not complete is that it does not include students enrolled in private schools. However from a demographic perspective it is representative of the broader school age population of the city. The analysis of births and school age children will use a variety of approaches one of which will be the use of the concept of yield. Yield is determined by a simple calculation in which the number of births or children is divided into the number of single family homes in order to determine the number of births or children per single family unit. Analysis by quadrant areas and census block groups The analysis of housing and demographic data was done using two methods. `Big Picture" analysis was achieved by dividing the city into four unequal quadrants using the dividing lines provided by Highways 62 and 100. Map A shows these four quadrant areas. More detailed study was conducted using Census Block Groups (CBG) developed for the 2010 United States Census. Map B pictures these geographies. Many of the demographic statistics in this study have been aggregated to the CBG units, For this research each CBG was named. Names were chosen so as to, as much as possible, adhere to the existing city neighborhood designations. Legend NAME NE �NW SE Map A Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, M.,,.e..— 1 1 r Study Areas City of Edina September 2014 Legend Map B Block Groups Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Census Block Groups, City of Edina September 2014 Housing stock The City of Edina contains a wide variety of housing types, including 12,539 single - family homes, 604 individually platted townhomes, 3,856 condominiums, 5,080 apartments and over 600 duplex units. Table 1 lists the counts of these housing types by quadrant area. The Northeast area has the largest number of single - family homes in the district, with 4,613 units, while the Southeast area has the smallest number, with 1,345. The Southeast area has the greatest diversity of these types of housing units, with 1,345 single - family homes, 2,047 condominium units, 3,586 apartments, 195 townhomes and 90 duplex units. C O O M 0 M IX o O U E o c�oo,r CD a� �N Ch c 0 U X CO Q LO CL N C M ti N 0 X 7C�CD Q = r N to CO Cl) d E O Cn LO O) t�CDMO N CO 3 0 f- c m c0 0 M_ co CO N 00 L N N CL Cl) CA CL CO C O c •= N M M C LL CO N d= M LQ N N L O c m in rn � y (� H R O C Q N > >+� T O ,�UQ o rn �- Lu O V G 'a y N N _ N O C y O N m a `6 i 3 -r c C U •L, CO H V> m Q ZZtq� H to =w Value and age of single - family housing Table 2 details the median value and era built of the single - family homes in the 4 quadrant areas. The lowest median value ($407,400) is in the Southeast area. The Southwest area has the highest median value, with $462,300. Prior to 1950, the largest number of homes built in the district were in the Northeast area (2,128 units). During the decade of the 1950s, the highest level of new home construction was also in the Northeast area, with 1,810 new homes, but during that time the Northwest area saw 1,695 units built, and construction increased dramatically in the Southeast and Southwest areas with 669 and 578 units built respectively. Since the year 1980 the Northwest area had the largest amount of new home construction with 591 units built. 0 C" =�vooe e d m a o a 0 0 E CO � M M M m M M m M M x O a C a, V 0/ C° m (0 N n CO W O O W O M IL d M =^ M r O N M x00'OMNu,"' - e W N 7 O e o M N e O e M e OD m M •7 W N CO CL d W M M N E 0 o�aom�Of` m (D 1 0 e e c01ir�° a °0 a d n � ' ro ao N M N N •� a m � W d 3 m M W > p c x v M C C cc — V LO CO v r °v N CO E fp 4) y 00 w= v N E LL y O O cc C E W O a v M N IL N � C L N 47 O .►. O t4 ca y 0 A C L Q V Q rn ¢ Q o N N a W O r y N N _ F 0 N d p C r N y y 3 3 2 �v _ •C L L L L E c FM• :.i m Q ZZCO!� c°nx W 0 Table 3 details the median age and median value for single family homes for each of the census block groups (CBG) in the city. Dewey Hill - Cahill (34 years), Parkwood Knolls (36 years), and Lewis Park (41 years) are the youngest CBG areas in the city while Country Club (84 years), Morningside South (79 years), and Sunnyside -Arden Park (74 years) are the oldest. Countryside and Sunnyside -Arden Park have the highest median values whereas the homes in the Southdale, Edinbor- ough Park and Presidents areas have the lowest. Map C pictures the CBG areas of the city classified by median age of single family home. Analysis of the age of sin- gle- family housing clearly shows a northeast -to- southwest pattern of development with large numbers of older (pre - 1950) homes in the neighborhoods located to the east of Highway 100 and to the north of 54th Street, and a steady transition in a southwesterly direction to homes built during the 1960s, 70's and 80's. Map D portrays the CBG areas classified by median values of single family homes. Table 3 City of Edina Single Family Homes with Age and Median Value By Census Block Group April 2014 Median A e In Years Median Value All Single Of All Single- Of All Single- Census Family Family Detached Family Detached Block Group Homes Homes Homes 66th Street 2 NA NA Birchcrest 289 57 $340,300 Braemar Hills 261 46 $566,300 Bredeson Park 147 46 $499,000 Brookside 289 62 $318,500 Concord 315 64 $682,000 Cornelia 515 54 $406,300 Country Club 424 84 $902,850 Countryside 466 48 $446,600 Creek Knoll 267 65 $316,800 Creek Valley 301 47 $429,200 Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 34 $683,000 Edinborou h Park 15 61 $193,200 Fox Meadow 284 55 $573,900 Garden Park 460 56 $380,900 Garrison Lane 327 59 $333,300 Grandview 370 61 $350,000 Halifax -Tow es 368 74 $702,100 Highlands 286 59 $571,600 Indian Hills 366 45 $539,300 Intedachen -Todd Par 400 55 $632,200 Lake Comelib 387 56 $449,900 Lake Edina 158 49 $458,400 Lewis Park 113 41 $515,950 Minnehaha Woods 424 64 $644,650 Mornin side North 397 68 $410,600 Mornin side'South 248 _ 79 $439,550 Normandale Park 498 58 $326,960 Pamela Park 333 62 $310,300 Park Lawn 0 0 $0 Parkwood Knolls 451 36 $779,200 Presidents 342 62 $226,700 Promenade 13 38 NA Prospect Knolls 310 46 $517,350 Rosland Park 218 58 $342,800 Southdale 11 62 $176,100 St Johns Park 331 60 $326,800 Strachauer Park 341 61 $297,500 Sunn side -Arden Park 369 74 $836,500 The Heights 468 51 $436,650 Walnut Ridge Park 278 46 $742,150 Yorktown Park 26 63 $198,900 Zenith 468 63 1 $274,100 TOTAL 12,539 57 Sources Of Data: Edina City Assessor Legend Median Age 0 1 -49 50 - 59 Map C Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, ^ Median Age in Years Of Single Family Homes City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 Legend Median Value NA O $1 - $350,000 $350,001 - $499,000 - $499,001 - $644,650 Map D Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Median Values Of Single Family Homes City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 The Role of Age of Housing Previous geographic studies conducted by the author in other first ring suburban communities have found that the age of single family homes is a major factor in determining such demographic characteristics as distribution and density of families with school age children and births, patterns of households with age 55+ residents, and the yields of school age children in single family homes once they are sold. This study will investigate whether or not these past findings hold true in the city of Edina. Households with Births Table 4 lists the annual number of births, with comparatives, for the City of Edina for the calendar years 1998 -2013. From a count of 484 births in the year 2007 births declined to 413 in 2008 but have steadily increased to an annual count of 486 in 2013. For the purposes of mapping and geographic analysis of births the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) provided records of live births occurring in the city from September 1, 2008 to August 31, 2013. Because of administrative factors the counts of births in this mapping and analysis is approximately 10% less than the total seen in Table 4. Nevertheless the results of this mapping work are very helpful in understanding the residential and spatial patterns of the city's births. Tables 5 through 9 are derived from this mapped birth data. Table 5 details the housing type of live births in the city during the period September 12008 to August 31 2013. During that period there were 2028 births in the city of Edina. Seventy percent of the births were in households occupying single family homes, Twenty three percent of the births were in households in multi- family units. Table 4 City of Edina Resident Live Births by Calendar Year With Comparitives Years 1998 -2013 April 2014 Suburban Hennepin Hennepin City Of Year Minnesota County County Edina 1998 1999 65,207 15,669 9,328 456 454 65,953 15,968 9,670 2000 67,451 16,553 9,908 433 2001 66,617 16,327 9,729 449 2002 68,037 16,112 9,738 429 2003 70,053 15,440 9,941 461 2004 70,617 16,718 10,258 454 2005 70,950 16,348 10,101 442 2006 73,515 16,780 10,223 435 2007 73,675 16,848 10,532 484 2008 72,382 16,566 10,212 413 2009 70,617 16,334 10,017 431 2010 68,407 15,955 9,854 425 2011 68,416 15,943 9,894 458 2012 68,783 16,345 10,294 481 2013 69,183 16,584 10,468 486 Sources Of Data Minnesota Department Of Health 10 Table 6 breaks down the births during the same 5 year period as above, in single family homes by quadrant area. This shows the yields of births. Yield is a calculation which determines the number of births per single family home. The highest yield of births to single family units was in the northeast area (0.14 births per home). The lowest was in the southwest area (0.08 births per single family unit. Tables 7 and 8 shows the percentages of homes with births for the same 5 year period by age and value of home. The age range with the highest percentage of homes with births (11 percent) was 1960 -79. Homes built since 1980 had the lowest percentage (7 percent). When single family homes are classi- fied by value we find that the percentage of homes with births is very similar among the classes. Three of the four value class- es had 9 percent of the homes with at least one birth while the fourth class had 8 percent. 11 E « c d m O= o > 0 N e O e O c a m U E C L E Y C .o CO 'D O m m c 0 U c N d E Ott >se� o N �£ a o L V N 3 m O C C X IL jp C Ned X Ha�rI 00 v � m c c X yr a� <oe� N y Y CL m e X m � C E m 0 N W M IL v e e� o amp c E N V t:LLO m T E N OI L O t' M N E o Q f o v N e O y m O. d' _ OO S OD N OD n C y c E N L li m E th r n N (D W 0 n N � d M G Y m d 0 C = t0 V A N N N N U) 0 y M E L 0"0 Q V O O OODD (O N « @ C m'. CSI � J m 100 N @ O > Q L @ JIDD O o' °o X m @ E d C7 `o 0I N A r uNi y 0 N C E N ' U) � E m O N O O O O O Zz0 =4 Table 6 breaks down the births during the same 5 year period as above, in single family homes by quadrant area. This shows the yields of births. Yield is a calculation which determines the number of births per single family home. The highest yield of births to single family units was in the northeast area (0.14 births per home). The lowest was in the southwest area (0.08 births per single family unit. Tables 7 and 8 shows the percentages of homes with births for the same 5 year period by age and value of home. The age range with the highest percentage of homes with births (11 percent) was 1960 -79. Homes built since 1980 had the lowest percentage (7 percent). When single family homes are classi- fied by value we find that the percentage of homes with births is very similar among the classes. Three of the four value class- es had 9 percent of the homes with at least one birth while the fourth class had 8 percent. 11 Table 6 City of Edina City of Edina Yield of Live Births (September 1, 2008 - August 31, 2013) In Single Family Homes September 1, 2008 - August 31, 2013 By Study Area By Era Built April 2014 April 2014 Median Value All Of All Single- Single Yield Of Single Family Family Detached Live Births Births Study Area Homes Homes 2008 -2013 In SF Homes Northeast 4613 $434,100 653 0.14 Northwest 4061 $435,100 427 0.11 Southeast 1345 $407,400 139 0.10 Southwest 2520 $462,300 209 0.08 411 11% 37% Post 1980 1333 TOTAL 12,539 7% 1428 0.11 TOTAL 12539 100% 1118 9% Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System Minnesota Dept. Of Health Edina City Assessor Table 7 City of Edina Single Family Homes with Live Births September 1, 2008 - August 31, 2013 By Era Built April 2014 Single Homes Percent Homes With Births Family As Percent Homes With Homes As Percent Of All Era Built Homes Of All Births With Births Homes With Births Pre 1950 2713 22% 243 9% 22% 1950-1959 4752 38% 372 8% 33% 1960-1979 3741 30% 411 11% 37% Post 1980 1333 11% 92 7% 8% TOTAL 12539 100% 1118 9% 100% Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System Minnesota Dept. Of Health Edina City Assessor 12 Table 8 City of Edina Single Family Homes with Live Births September 1, 2008 - August 31, 2013 By Value Class ( Estimated Market Value) April 2014 Single Homes Percent Homes With Births Estimated Family As Percent Homes With Homes As Percent Of All Market Value Homes Of All Births With Births Homes With Births $0 - $299,999 2063 16% 183 9% 16% $300,000 - $499,999 5541 44% 510 9% 46% $500,000 - $749,999 2801 22% 251 9% 22% $750.000+ 2134 17% 174 8% 16% TOTAL 12539 100% 1118 9% 100% Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System Minnesota Dept. Of Health Edina City Assessor Table 9 shows the percentage, by individual census block groups, of single family homes with at least one birth during the September 2008 to August 2013 period. The data is arranged by median age of the single family unit. Those block groups with a median age younger than 51 years all have percentages in the single digits. The block groups with the high- est percentages are Pamela Park (15 %), Zenith (14 %), Strachauer Park and Brookside both with 13 %. Map E pictures the data detailed in Table 9. There is a clear pattern of higher percentages of single family units with births in the neighborhoods of the northeast with lower percentages in the southwest. The age of single family homes appears to be a major factor in this demographic pattern. 13 Table 9 City of Edina Percentage of Single Family Homes with At Least One Birth September 1, 2008 - Au ust 30 2013 By Census Block Group Arranged by Median Age April 2014 Median Age In Years Median Value Single Family All Single Of All Single-- Of All Single- Homes with Percent Census Family Family Detached Family Detached Households Households Block Group Homes Homes Homes With Births With Births Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 34 $683,000 9 4% Parkwood Knolls 451 36 $779,200 18 4% Promenade 13 38 NA 0 0% Lewis Park 113 41 $515,950 9 8% Indian Hills 366 45 $539,300 17 5% Braemar Hills 261 46 $566,300 17 7% Bredeson Park 147 46 $499,000 7 5% Prospect Knolls 310 46 $517,350 19 6% Walnut Ridge Park 278 46 $742,150 13 5% Creek Valley 301 47 $429,200 16 5% Countryside 466 48 $446,600 28 6% Lake Edina 158 49 $458,400 8 5% The Heights 468 51 $436,650 32 7% Cornelia 515 54 $406,300 51 10% Fox Meadow 284 55 $573,900 16 6% Interlachen -Todd Park 400 55 $632,200 33 8% Garden Park 460 56 $380,900 50 11% Lake Comelia 387 56 $449,900 30 8% Birchcrest 289 57 $340,300 27 9% Normandale Park 498 58 $326,960 53 11% Rosland Park 218 58 $342,800 21 10% Garrison Lane 327 59 $333,300 32 10% Highlands 286 59 $571,600 28 10% St. Johns Park 331 60 $326,800 37 11% Edinborou h Park 15 61 $193,200 0 0% Grandview 370 61 $350,000 35 9% Strachauer Park 341 61 $297,500 43 13% Brookside 289 62 $318,500 39 13% Pamela Park 333 62 $310,300 49 15% Presidents 342 62 $226,700 33 10% Southdale 11 62 $176,100 1 9% Yorktown Park 26 63 $198,900 9 35% Zenith 468 63 $274,100 66 14% Concord 315 64 $682,000 27 9% Minnehaha Woods 424 64 $644,650 36 8% Creek Knoll 267 65 $316,800 33 12% Mornin side North 397 68 $410,600 42 11% Halifax- Townes 368 74 $702,100 39 11% Sunn side -Arden Park 369 74 $836,500 26 7% Momin side South 248 79 $439,550 24 10% Country Club 424 84 $902,850 34 8% 66th Street 2 NA NA 0 0% Park Lawn 0 0 $0 0 0% TOTAL 12,539 57 1,107 9% Sources Of Data Hennepin Count Geo ra hic Information System Edina City Assessor 14 Legend % SF with Births U 0% 1 % -7% 8 % -11% ® 12 % -15% Map E Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Percentage of Households In Single Family Homes With Births Sept. 1, 2008 -Aug. 30, 2013 City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 15 Deaths The table below lists the annual number deaths reported by the Minnesota Department of health for 2004 -2013. The av- erage number of deaths per year over the 10 year period is 463. The average number of births per year during this same time period was 451. City of Edina, Annual Deaths* Year Count 2004 507 2005 412 2006 438 2007 435 2008 498 2009 450 2010 455 2011 504 2012 477 2013 458 Yearly Average 463 *Minnesota Department of Health Households with School Age Children Approximately thirty percent of the single family homes in the city have households with school age children. The numbers of publicly enrolled school age children in each of Edina's census block groups can be seen in Table 10. Map F depicts these child counts in graphic form. Areas of high counts are generally distributed throughout the city. Only the far northwest areas lack a block group with a higher end number of school age children. The housing type of Edina's school age children, by quadrant area, is shown in Table 11. Eighty eight percent of these children live in single family homes, while eight percent reside in multi- family units. The northeast quadrant has the larg- est number of school age children (2,564) while the southeast has the lowest (1,201). Table 12 details the same housing type data only breaks it down by census block group. The Country Club CBG has the largest number of children (321) living in single family homes. The Lake Edina CBG has the largest number of children (145) occupying multi- family units. 16 M a � O N- CD <O- O y= > -iWWcWMXTTTTTTzKKgm (D c 7 > N 0 c 0 m 0 maw 0 w m N is3 0 0 0 > 0 >_> 7 r O1 9 9r, (D 9 5= 2 a ioS 1MODO m 07 m U.a W X MOOOc�c�c�c�000 C�mm733 m fD 0 0 C: 0 c 0 0 - 6 onms (D MMO N (j D °C W 0 O n —I 15 °' = D r 3ocY=.<33=r0) (D m o� = y n -0 ° Q o w `< m3 w rp Percent mm s d All n o w 9_ °�wnv,m�om;V;V =° ?( C < o ° m° d o School A e < 7C Children in r.N$�cm3oco d o w' n o d m School Age School A e Children in Children in School Ag Single-Family =. �i C 0 fD ° Split Children in Children in Condominium O Study Areas Children N c m Multi-Family - rL Duplex v n ^' m o n ' -p O n m w w N 03 01 O7 7 01 N (D = m n V, � � dl F m °7 n ° to x N 7 ° w N l°± 30 1% N 1% _ m .. O m O x �% 1201 754 63% 369 IN) :� �!F 15 1% Dr 0% 41 3% Southwest 1612 fC CD in ad;c 7% 4 0% '� 7 ° fD 1% 7t c�lnZ� 0% N of m m ><i 7574 s� 88% (D 8% 91 C Q 71 1% 50 -0 m rn 1% Om ' rn O !Z o N w (D '� —_ m y - 0 a m D) ? Sources Of Data C m co) 0) CL Henna in Coun Geo ra hic Information System CL Edina Cit Assessor IOU n C O M y a (1) 7 O ::4 8; � 00 OD N N n N O N N A N O N O — W OA ODWO(N W N N O -• -� �O n= ? ,-4 o O W N O D C v OD Ln OD O W O O (O O CD W N O N O V A OD ON (D O (D O W O CT W (n V D— ♦• a N � CO) Table 11 City Of Edina Housing Type Of School -A ed Children (public school enrolled April 2014 Percent Percent Percent All School A e School A e Percent Percent School A e SchoolAgel Percent School A e School A e Resident Children in Children in School A e School Age School Age School Age Children in Children In School Age School A e Children in Children in School Ag Single-Family Single-Family Children in Children in Children in Children in Split Split Children in Children in Condominium Condominium Study Areas Children Homes Homes Multi-Family' Multi-Family Duplex Duplex Duplex Duplex Townhomes Townhomes units units Northeast 2564 2492 97% 13 1% 41 2% 5 0% 10 0% 2 0% Northwest 2197 1992 91% 116 5% 30 1% 27 1% 12 1% 20 1% Southeast 1201 754 63% 369 31% 16 1% 15 1% 6 0% 41 3% Southwest 1612 1450 90% 111 7% 4 0% 24 1% 22 1% 1 0% TOTAL 7574 6688 88% 609 8% 91 1% 71 1% 50 1% 64 1% *Apartments, Triplex Sources Of Data Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Henna in Coun Geo ra hic Information System Edina Cit Assessor V Legend Children L�8 -78 79 - 144 �] 145 - 177 178 - 226 Map F Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Excensus LLC. Counts Of School Age Children (Public School Enrolled) City of Edina (By Census Block Groups) September 2014 Disclaimer: This map is to he usad nnly fnr data 18 Table 12 City of Edina Housing Type of School A e Children SAC By Census Block Group April 2014 SAC In SAC in SAC in SAC In SAC In Census Single Family Multi- Family Duplex Split Duplex SAC In Condominium Block Group All SAC Homes Units Units Units Townhomes Units 66th Street 10 0 6 0 0_ 4 0 Birchcrest 177 177 0 0 0 0 0 Braemar Hills 175 163 0 0 12 0 0 Bredeson Park 103 79 0 0 11 1 12 Brookside 195 119 56 14 4 2 0 Concord 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 Cornelia 271 263 6 2 0 0 0 Country Club 321 321 0 0 0 0 0 Countryside 269 263 0 0 0 6 0 Creek Knoll 108 106 0 2 0 0 0 Creek Valley 158 158 0 0 0 0 0 Dewey Hill - Cahill 139 110 8 0 0 20 1 Edinborough Park 8 3 0 0 0 0 5 Fox Meadow 142 142 0 0 0 0 0 Garden Park 300 297 0 2 1 0 0 Garrison Lane 201 160 13 15 3 10 0 Grandview 209 207 2 0 0 0 0 Halifax- Townes 222 220 0 0 0 0 2 Highlands 196 183 13 0 0 0 0 Indian Hills 248 233 0 3 12 0 0 Interiachen -Todd Par 144 134 0 2 0 0 8 Lake Cornelia 257 257 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Edina 276 100 145 10 11 0 10 Lewis Park 157 69 86 0 0 2 0 Minnehaha Woods 212 212 0 0 0 0 0 Momingside North 200 200 0 0 0 1 0 0 Morningside South 165 164 0 1 0 0 0 Normandale Park 253 253 0 0 0 0 0 Pamela Park 138 132 0 4 2 0 0 Park Lawn 120 0 108 0 0 0 12 Parkwood Knolls 219 161 45 4 9 0 0 Presidents 78 76 0 2 0 0 0 Promenade 28 0 17 0 0 2 9 Prospect Knolls 164 164 0 0 0 0 0 Rosland Park 120 120 0 0 0 0 0 Southdale 36 3 20 4 4 0 5 St. Johns Park 160 160 0 0 0 0 0 Strachauer Park 173 154 0 19 0 0 0 Sunnyside -Arden Park 226 226 0 0 0 0 0 The Heights 318 300 17 1 0 0 0 Walnut Ridge Park 165 154 67 6 2 3 0 Yorktown Park 75 8 0 0 0 0 0 Zenith 188 188 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7,574 6,689 609 91 71 50 64 Sources Of Data Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Henne in Coun G__ ra hic Information System Edina Ci Assessor The percent of homes with school age children in the four era classes is shown in Table 13. The proportions are very similar ranging from 28 percent in homes built since 1980 to 31 percent in homes built pre 1950 and during the years between 1960 and 1979. The percent of homes with school age children in the four value classes is shown in Table 14. Homes valued at $299,000 or less had the highest percentage (34 %) of households with school age children, while units with a value of $750,000 and greater had the lowest (26 %). Age and value data can be seen by individual census block groups in Table 15. Map G Shows that the CBGs with the highest percentages of single family homes with households with school age chil- dren are in the central and eastern parts of the city. Although the difference is not profound the younger neighborhoods in the west have on a percentage basis fewer single family households with school age children than do the homes in the central and eastern areas of the city. WE Table 13 City of Edina Single Family Homes with Households with School Age Children (Public Enrolled) By Era Built By Value Class ( Estimated Market Value) April 2014 April 2014 Homes With Homes With Percent School Age Children Percent Single Homes Homes With Homes With As Percent Of All Homes With Family As Percent School Age School Age Homes With School Era Built Homes Of All Children Children Age Children Pre 1950 2713 22% 830 31% 23% 1950 -1959 4752 38% 1363 29% 38% 1960-1979 3741 30% 1144 31% 31% Post 1980 1333 11% 367 28% 10% 26% 15% TOTAL 12539 100% 3704 30% 100% 30% 100% Sources Of Data Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System Hennepin County Geographic Information System Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Edina City Assessor _ Edina City Assessor Table 14 City of Edina Single Family Homes with Households with School Age Children (Public School Enrolled) By Value Class ( Estimated Market Value) April 2014 Homes With Percent School Age Children Single Homes Homes With Homes With As Percent Of All Estimated Family As Percent School A e School A e Homes With School Market Value Homes Of All Children Children Age Children $0 - $299,999 2063 16% 700 34% 19% $300,000 - $499,999 5541 44% 1604 29% 44% $500,000 - $749,999 2801 22% 853 30% 23% $750.000+ 2134 17% 547 26% 15% TOTAL 12539 100% 3704 30% 100% Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts _ Edina City Assessor 20 Table 15 City of Edina Percentage of Single Family Homes with Households With at Least One School Age Child (SAC) By Census Block Group Arranged by Median Age April 2014 Median Age Single Family In Years Median Value Homes with Percent All Single Of All Single- Of All Single- Households Households Census Family Detached Family Detached With School With School Block Group -Family Homes Homes Homes Age Children Age Children Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 34 $683,000 57 28% Parkwood Knolls 451 36 $779,200 81 18% Promenade 13 38 NA 0 0% Lewis Park 113 41 $515,950 37 33% Indian Hills 366 45 $539,300 115 31% Braemar Hills 261 46 $566,300 78 30% Bredeson Park 147 46 $499,000 43 29% Prospect Knolls 310 46 $517,350 93 30% Walnut Ridge,Park 278 46 $742,150 80 29% Creek Valley 301 47 $429,200 92 31% Countryside 466 48 $446,600 146 31% Lake Edina 158 49 $458,400 53 34% The Heights 468 51 $436,650 163 35% Cornelia 515 54 $406,300 145 28% Fox Meadow 284 55 $573,900 79 28% Interlachen -Todd Par 400 55 $632,200 79 20% Garden Park 460 56 $380,900 165 36% Lake Cornelia 387 56 $449,900 142 37% Birchcrest 289 57 $340,300 98 34% Normandale Park 498 58 $326,960 152 31% Rosland Park 218 58 $342,800 67 31% Garrison Lane 327 59 1 $333,300 95 29% Highlands 286 59 $571,600 106 37% St. Johns Park 331 60 $326,800 94 28% Edinborou h Park 15 61 $193,200 2 13% Grandview 370 61 $350,000 115 31% Strachauer Park 341 61 $297,500 94 28% Brookside 289 62 $318,500 69 24% Pamela Park 333 62 $310,300 80 24% Presidents 342 62 $226,700 45 13% Southdale 11 62 $176,100 0 0% Yorktown Park 26 63 $198,900 5 19% Zenith 468 63 $274,100 111 24% Concord 315 64 $682,000 126 40% Minnehaha Woods _ 424 64 $644,650 117 28% Creek Knoll 267 65 $316,800 60 22% Momin side North 397 68 $410,600 120 30% Halifax- Townes 368 74 $702,100 122 33% Sunn side -Arden Park 369 74 $836,500 122 33% Mornin side South 248 79 $439,550 90 36% Country Club 424 84 $902,850 165 39% 66th Street 2 NA NA 0 0% Park Lawn 0 0 $0 0 0% TOTAL 12,539 57 3,703 30% Sources Of Data Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Hennepin County Geographic Information System Edina City Assessor 21 Legend = Block Groups % SF with SAC 0% C 1 % -22% Map G Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Excensus LLC Percentage of Households In Single Family Homes With School Age Children (Public Sch.) City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 N 22 In addition to analyzing percentages of units with children it is also possible to investigate the yields or numbers of children per single family home. Table 16 presents the yields by school grade for each of quadrant areas. The overall yield of all public school children in the city is 0.53. The author has studied a number of other first ring suburban communities and this yield is higher than all others studied. Tables 17 and 18 show yield data for eras built and value classes. The 1960 to 1979 era with 3,741 homes and 2,156 children had the highest yield of 0.58. With respect to home value the $500,000 to $749,999 class had the highest yield (0.58) while the lowest yield (0.49) was in the $750,000+ value class. 23 d E 'O 7 N a x U a C N W � ���LO � LO M U � U 2 _ r �fOOOOO o a c a N to O O T M g° 0, t0 t` v t0 v m N 'T n N L U� d v='����� U a c W��� m V n CO CO d ty O r t �'looco 0 va y c W �NtO y C7 Y LO A --t CO C4 C, p U x ,E d 'O = 44 LL L� Y c o o c o m va CM C N N made d � to -- o W -� C cxrn quo-, CO NQ= vfn_NO�a ccoo U N c O LL c W o o 0 °— t V w c 0 o OE 0 0 0 0 0 0 V_ Cli t` N 0 N a to H t96% d d 2OLL _ Ufn N y C N_ O N Q d d1 O O c £ EtOO M � LO U Z y LL S a a N N N C V V D L N wL o CM C U Q- O CM L W C N c i a 0 C 30 N Y U Q m W H O o N Vl N 3 TO 3 J d= U e=o `m .L L rr L L L >> Q U r 2 C (6 FU5m< �.a z °zinin inwiw 23 Table 17 City Of Edina Yield Of School Age Children (SAC) In Single Family Homes By Era Built Market Value) April 2014 April 2014 K -12 Yield Yield Single Single Of Students Of SAC Family Family SAC In Single In Single Era Built Homes Family Homes Family Homes Pre 1950 2713 1478 0.54 1950-59 4752 2388 0.50 1960-79 3741 2156 0.58 Post 1980 1333 667 0.50 TOTAL TOTAL 12539 6689 0.53 Sources Of Data Sources Of Data Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Hennepin County Geographic Information System Edina Cit Assessor 1 —d Table 18 City Of Edina Yield of School Age Children In Single Family Homes By Value Class ( Estimated Market Value) April 2014 K -12 Yield Single K -12 Students Of Students Estimated Family In Single In Single Market Value Homes Family Homes Family Homes - $300,000 2063 1128 0.55 $300,000 - $499,999 5541 2874 0.52 $500,000 - $749,999 2801 1632 0.58 $750,000+ 2134 1055 0.49 TOTAL 12539 6689 0.53 Sources Of Data Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Hennepin County Geographic Information System Edina City Assessor 24 Table 19 details the single family home yield of school age children by census block group. The CBG areas with the highest yields of school age children are located in the older neighborhoods of the city; Concord (0.79), Country Club (0.76), Lake Cornelia (O.66) and Morningside South (0.66). Analysis of the population of school age children by (1) percent of single family homes with children and (2) the yield of school age per single family home, indicates that the homes in the older eastern areas of the city have more school age children than the younger western neighborhoods. Table 19 City of Edina Yield of School Age Children SAC) In Single Family Homes By Census Block Grou April 2014 All Single SAC In Yield of SAC Census Family Single Family. In Single Family Block Group Homes Homes Homes 66th Street 2 0 0.00 Birchcrest 289 177 0.61 Braemar Hills 261 163 0.62 Bredeson Park 147 79 0.54 Brookside 289 119 0.41 Concord 315 250 0.79 Cornelia 515 263 0.51 Country Club 424 321 0.76 Countryside 466 263 0.56 Creek Knoll 267 106 0.40 _ Creek Valley 301 158 0.52 Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 110 0.54 Edinborou h Park _ 15 3 0.20 Fox Meadow 284 142 0.50 Garden Park 460 297 0.65 Garrison Lane 327 160 0.49 Grandview 370 207 0.56 Halifax- Townes 368 220 0.60 _ Highlands 286 183 0.64 Indian Hills 366 233 0.64 Interlachen -Todd Par 400 134 0.34 Lake Cornelia 387 257 0.66 Lake Edina 158 100 0.63 Lewis Park 113 69 0.61 Minnehaha Woods 424 212 0.50 _ Morningside North 397 200 0.50 Morningside South 248 164 0.66 Normandale Park 498 253 0.51 Pamela Park 333 132 0.40 Park Lawn 0 0 0.00 Parkwood Knolls 451 161 0.36 Presidents 342 76 0.22 Promenade 13 0 0.00 _ Prospect Knolls 310 164 0.53 Rosland Park 218 120 0.55 Southdale 11 3 0.27 St. Johns Park 331 160 0.48 Strachauer Park 341 154 0.45 Sunn side -Arden Park 369 226 0.61 The Heights 468 300 0.64 Walnut Ridge Park 278 154 0.55 Yorktown Park 26 8 0.31 Zenith 468 188 0.40 TOTAL 12,539 6,689 0.53 Sources Of Data: Edina City Assessor Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts 25 Households age 55+ Fifty three percent of the households in the City of Edina have a householder age 55 or older. With the aging of the "baby boom" generation this age group is projected to grow dramatically in the future. Table 20 lists the counts of households with a householder age 55 +. Map H illustrates the density of these counts by CBG. The Yorktown Park (606), Dewey Hill - Cahill (588), and Bre- deson Park (574) CBG areas have the highest numbers of these households. These high counts are no doubt related to the fact that these areas have large numbers of condomini- um and apartment units. Percentages of households with age 55+ householders can be seen in Table 21 and Map I. Dewey Hill - Cahill (76 %), Promenade (70 %), and Bredeson Park (69 %) have the highest percentages. 26 Table 20 City Of Edina Counts of Households with Householder Age 55+ Year 2011 By Census Block Group September 2014 Count Census Of Households Block Group Age 55+ 66th Street 252 Birchcrest 138 Braemar Hills 165 Bredeson Park 574 Brookside 485 Concord 138 Cornelia 296 Country Club 151 Countryside 367 Creek Knoll 133 Creek Valley 167 Dewey Hill - Cahill 588 Edinborou h Park 471 Fox Meadow 197 Garden Park 217 Garrison Lane 221 Grandview 343 Halifax- Townes 297 Highlands 132 Indian Hills 228 Interlachen -Todd Pk. 385 Lake Cornelia 184 Lake Edina 236 Lewis Park 256 Minnehaha Woods 211 Momin side North 183 Momin side South 112 Normandale Park 241 Pamela Park 151 Park Lawn 181 Parkwood Knolls 328 Presidents 155 Promenade 566 Prospect Knolls 164 Rosland Park 270 Southdale 306 St. Johns Park 145 Strachauer Park 166 Sunn side -Arden Park 153 The Heights 256 Walnut Ridge Park 209 Yorktown Park 606 Zenith 185 Total 11,209 Source Of Data Excensus LLC 26 Legend Counts, Age 55+ Households 112 - 155 Map H Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Infnrmation Counts Of Households, 2011 With Householder Age 55+ City of Edina (By Census Block Groups) September 2014 27 Table 21 City Of Edina Households with Householder Age 55+ As Percenta a of all Households Year 2011 By Census Block Group September 2014 Percent Households Households Census Block With Householder With Householder Group Age 55+ All Households Age 55+ 66th Street 252 487 52% Birchcrest 138 289 48% Braemar Hills 165 287 57% Bredeson Park 574 826 69% Brookside 485 824 59% Concord 138 314 44% Cornelia 296 578 51% Country Club 151 424 36% Countryside 367 605 61% Creek Knoll 133 281 47% Creek Valley 167 299 56% Dewey Hill - Cahill 588 772 76% Edinborou h Park 471 761 62% Fox Meadow 197 335 59% Garden Park 217 463 47% Garrison Lane 221 494 45% Grandview 343 562 61% Halifax- Townes 297 563 53% Highlands 132 284 46% Indian Hills 228 412 55% Interlachen -Todd Pk. 385 614 63% Lake Cornelia 184 386 48% Lake Edina 236 887 27% Lewis Park 256 430 60% Minnehaha Woods 211 450 47% Mornin side North 183 396 46% Mornin side South 112 264 42% Normandale Park 241 497 48% Pamela Park 151 338 45% Park Lawn 181 583 31% Parkwood Knolls 328 792 41% Presidents 155 360 43% Promenade 566 810 70% Prospect Knolls 164 306 54% Rosland Park 270 426 63% Southdale 306 536 57% St. Johns Park 145 337 43% Strachauer Park 166 375 44% Sunn side -Arden Park 153 363 42% The Heights 256 515 50% Walnut Ridge Park 209 337 62% Yorktown Park 606 886 68% Zenith 185 465 40% Totals 11209 21213 53% Source Of Data Excensus LLC 28 Legend QBlock Groups Percent Age 55+ Households 27% - 36% Map Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information Q —f -- Households, (2011), With Householder Age 55+ As Percent of all Households City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 29 Fifty Percent of Age 55+ households occupy single family homes which they own. Tables 22 and 23 and Maps J and K il- lustrate this data by CBG. Map K portrays the percentage of households with householder age 55+ in owned single family homes. What is striking in this map is the CBG's with the highest percentages (leaving out Southdale and Edinborough Park which have very low counts) are almost all in the western half of the city. Here we clearly see higher percentages of older households living in the city's younger homes. Table 22 City Of Edina Counts of Households with Householder Age 55_+ Residing in Owned Single Family Homes Year 2011 _ By Census Block Grou September 2014 Median Age In Years Median Value Households Of All Single- Of All Single- In Owned Family Detached Family Detached Single Family NAME Homes Homes Homes 66th Street NA NA 0 Birchcrest 57 $340,300 135 Braemar Hills 46 $566,300 155 Bredeson Park 46 $499,000 141 Brookside 62 $318,500 108 Concord 64 $682,000 132 Comelia 54 $406,300 261 Country Club 84 $902,850 146 Countryside 48 $446,600 241 Creek Knoll 65 $316,800 119 Creek Valle 47 $429,200 166 Dewey Hill - Cahill 34 $683,000 107 Edinborou h Park 61 $193,200 7 Fox Meadow 55 $573,900 133 Garden Park 56 $380,900 210 Garrison Lane 59 $333,300 161 Grandview 61 $350,000 176 Halifax- Townes 74 $702,100 152 Highlands 59 $571,600 128 Indian Hills 45 $539,300 210 Interlachen -Todd Pk. 55 $632,200 201 Lake Comelia 56 $449,900 180 Lake Edina 49 $458,400 93 Lewis Park 41 $515,950 64 Minnehaha Woods 64 $644,650 199 Mornin side North 68 $410,600 180 Mornin side South 79 $439,550 100 Normandale Park 58 $326,960 237 Pamela Park 62 $310,300 144 Park Lawn 0 $0 0 Parkwood Knolls 36 $779,200 251 Presidents 62 $226,700 139 Promenade 38 NA 0 Prospect Knolls 46 $517,350 161 Rosland Park 58 $342,800 103 Southdale 62 $176,100 7 St. Johns Park 60 $326,800 136 Strachauer Park 61 $297,500 146 Sunn side -Arden Park 74 $836,500 145 The Heights 51 $436,650 241 Walnut Ridge Park 46 $742,150 157 Yorktown Park 63 $198,900 7 Zenith 63 $274,100 177 Total 5956 Sources of Data: Edina City Assessor, Excensus LLC 30 Table 23 City Of Edina Percent of Households with Householder Age 55+ Residing within Owned Single amil Homes Year 2011 By Census Block Group September 2014 Percent Median Age Households Households In Years Median Value With Age 55+ With Age 55+ Of All Sin le- Of All Single- All Owned In Owned In Owned Census Block Family Detached Family Detached Single-Family Single Family Single Family Group Homes Homes Homes Homes Homes 66th Street NA NA 0 0 0% Birchcrest 57 $340,300 278 135 49% Braemar Hills 46 $566,300 267 155 58% Bredeson Park 46 $499,000 214 141 66% Brookside 62 $318,500 271 108 40% Concord 64 $682,000 301 132 44% Cornelia 54 $406,300 498 261 52% Country Club 84 $902,850 396 146 37% Countryside 48 $446,600 449 241 54% Creek Knoll 65 $316,800 243 119 49% Creek Valle 47 $429,200 294 166 56% Dewey Hill - Cahill 34 $683,000 189 107 57% Edinborou h Park 61 $193,200 9 7 78% Fox Meadow 55 $573,900 251 133 53% Garden Park 56 $380,900 435 210 48% Garrison. Lane 59 $333,300 312 161 52% Grandview 61 $350,000 347 176 51% Halifax- Townes 74 $702,100 333 152 46% Highlands 59 $571,600 269 128 48% Indian Hills 45 $539,300 362 210 58% Interlachen -Todd Pk. 55 $632,200 362 201 56% Lake Cornelia 56 $449,900 360 180 50% Lake Edina 49 $458,400 169 93 55% Lewis Park 41 $515,950 107 64 60% Minnehaha Woods 64 $644,650 395 199 50% Momin side North 68 $410,600 371 180 49% Mornin side South 79 $439,550 232 100 43% Normandale Park 58 $326,960 473 237 50% Pamela Park 62 $310,300 294 144 49% Park Lawn 0 $0 0 0 0% Parkwood Knolls 36 $779,200 428 251 59% Presidents 62 $226,700 313 139 44% Promenade 38 NA 0 0 0% Prospect Knolls 46 $517,350 296 161 54% Rosland Park 58 $342,800 202 103 51% Southdale 62 $176,100 9 7 78% St. Johns Park 60 $326,800 307 136 44% Strachauer Park 61 $297,500 301 146 49% Sunn side -Arden Park 74 $836,500 345 145 42% The Heights 51 $436,650 456 241 53% Walnut Ridge Park 46 $742,150 266 157 59% Yorktown Park 63 $198,900 13 7 54% Zenith 63 $274,100 416 177 43% Total 57 $437,550 11833 5956 50% Sources of Data: Edina city Assessor. Excensus LLC 31 Legend QBlock Groups Counts Age 55+ Households 0 -7 r—� Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Counts of Households,( 2011), With Householder Age 55+ In Owned Single Family Homes. City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 Disclaimer: This map is 32 Legend = Block Groups % age 55+ LF 0% - 46% Map K Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System FXCP.nsns LLC Percent of Households, (2011), With Householder Age 55+ In Owned Single Family Homes, City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 Ilisrlaimer This man is I 33 The distribution throughout the city of age 55+ households in owned and rented multi- family housing is seen in tables 24 and 25 and Map L. Owned multi- family housing refers to condominium units. The highest numbers of age 55+ house- holds in owned multi- family units are in the Bredeson Park (370) and Dewey Hill - Cahill (355) census block groups. The highest concentrations of these households in rented condominium units and apartments are found in the Brookside (364) and Promenade (276) census block groups. Table 24 Ci Of Edina Counts of Households with Householder Age 55+ Residing Within Owned Multi-Family Dwelling Year2011 By Census Block Group September 2014 Households Census Block In Owned Group Multi-Family 66th Street 108 Birchcrest 0 Braemar Hills 0 Bredeson Park 370 Brookside 1 Concord 0 Cornelia 10 Country Club 0 Countryside 108 Creek Knoll 0 Creek Valley 0 Dewey Hill - Cahill 355 Edinborou h Park 283 Fox Meadow 35 Garden Park 0 Garrison Lane 3 Grandview 130 Halifax- Townes 80 Highlands 0 Indian Hills 0 Interlachen -Todd Pk. 149 Lake Cornelia 0 Lake Edina 52 Lewis Park 135 Minnehaha Woods 2 Momin side North 0 Momin side South 4 Normandale Park 0 Pamela Park 0 Park Lawn 65 Parkwood Knolls 0 Presidents 1 Promenade 290 Prospect Knolls 0 Rosland Park 93 Southdale 189 St. Johns Park 0 Strachauer Park 0 Sunn side -Arden Parl 0 The Heights 0 Walnut Ride Park 31 Yorktown Park 311 Zenith 0 Total 2805 Sources of Data Excensus LLC 34 Table 25 City Of Edina Counts of Households with Householder Age 55+ Residing Within Rented Multi-Family and Apartment Year 2011 By Census Block Group September 2014 Households In rented Households NAME Multi-Family in Apartments TOTAL 66th Street 15 128 143 _ Birchcrest 0 0 0 Braemar Hills 0 0 0 Bredeson Park 52 0 52 Brookside 0 364 364 Concord 0 0 0 Cornelia 4 17 21 Country Club 0 0 0 Countryside 7 0 7 Creek Knoll 0 0 0 Creek Valley 0 0 0 Dewey Hill - Cahill 97 27 124 Edinborou h Park 37 144 181 Fox Meadow 13 0 13 Garden Park 0 0 0 Garrison Lane 0 29 29 Grandview 11 18 29 Halifax- Townes 27 17 44 Highlands 0 0 0 Indian Hills 0 0 0 Interiachen -Todd Pk. 22 0 22 Lake Comelia 0 0 0 Lake Edina 8 61 69 Lewis Park 17 38 55 Minnehaha Woods 0 0 0 Momingside North 0 0 0 Mornin side South 0 0 0 Normandale Park 0 0 0 Pamela Park 0 0 0 Park Lawn 16 100 116 Parkwood Knolls 0 50 50 Presidents 0 0 0 Promenade 63 213 276 Prospect Knolls 0 0 0 Rosland Park 19 50 69 Southdale 28 72 100 St. Johns Park 0 0 0 Strachauer Park 0 0 0 Sunn side -Arden Parl 0 0 0 The Heights 0 7 7 Walnut Ride Park 0 0 0 Yorktown Park 11 267 278 Zenith 0 0 0 Total 447 1602 2049 Sources of Data Excensus LLC 35 Legend Counts Age 55+ Households =0 -10 - - Map L Source of Data Edina City Geographic Information C. + m Counts of Households, 2011, With Householder Age 55+ In Owned Multi - Family Units City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 36 Sales of Single family Homes During the period between January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2014 1,948 single family homes were sold in the city. This represents sixteen percent of Edina's single family housing stock. These sales are detailed in Table 26. Map M Pictures this data showing the locations of the actual parcels sold. Map N shows the concentrations of single family home sales by CBG. There are two distinct areas with the highest numbers of sales, Creek Knoll, Minnehaha Woods, Pamela Park, and St. John Park, and a second area Interlachen -Todd Park, Brookside and Highlands. Tables 27 and 28 list the numbers of homes sales by era built and value class. Homes built since 1980 had the highest percentage of sales, units built during the 1960's and 70's had the lowest percentage of sales. The value classification $750,000+ had the largest proportion of sales with 21% of the units sold during that period. Table 26 City of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2014 By Census Block Group July 2014 All Single All Census Family Single Family Percent Block Group Homes Homes Sold Homes Sold 66th Street 2 0 0% _ Birchcrest 289 53 18% Braemar Hills 261 38 15% Bredeson Park 147 20 14% Brookside 289 55 19% _ Concord 315 57 18% Cornelia 1 515 71 14% Country Club 1 424 74 17% Countryside 466 74 16% Creek Knoll 267 52 19% Creek Valley 301 32 11% Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 31 15% Edinborou h Park 15 0 0% Fox Meadow 284 39 14% Garden Park 460 77 17% Garrison Lane 327 51 16% Grandview 370 50 14% Halifax- Townes 368 58 16% Highlands 286 54 19% Indian Hills 366 50 14% Interlachen -Todd Pa 400 77 19% Lake Cornelia 1 387 52 13% Lake Edina 158 23 15% Lewis Park 113 19 17% Minnehaha Woods 424 85 20% Momin side North 397 58 15% Mornin side South 248 38 15% Normandale Park 498 55 11% Pamela Park 333 76 23% Park Lawn 0 0 0% Parkwood Knolls 451 70 16% Presidents 342 44 13% Promenade 13 2 15% Prospect Knolls 310 44 14% Rosland Park 218 25 11% Southdale 11 2 18% St. Johns Park 331 65 20% Strachauer Park 341 53 16% Sunn side -Arden P rk 369 55 15% The Heights 468 47 10% Walnut Ridge Park 1 278 43 15% Yorktown Park 26 2 8% Zenith 468 77 16% TOTAL 12,539 1,948 16% Sources of Data: Excensus LLC 37 Legend Block Groups - Parcels sold Map M Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Distribution of Parcels With Single Family Homes Sold January 1, 2011 - June 30 2014, Census Block Groups, City of Edina, September 2014 ni 38 Legend % SF Sold 0% 1 % -11% 112 % - 15% Map N Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Percent of Single Family Homes Sold January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2014 City of Edina (by Census Block Groups) September 2014 39 Table 27 City of Edina Single Family Homes Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 - June 30 2014 Sold during January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2014 By Era Built By Value Class Estimated Market Value July 2014 July 2014 Single Single Homes Percent Percent Homes Sold Family Family As Percent Homes Homes As Percent Era Built Homes Of All Sold Sold Of All Sold Pre 1950 2,713 19% 378 14% 19% 1950 -59 4,752 33% 686 14% 35% 1960 -79 3,741 26% 499 13% 26% Post 1980 1,333 9% 385 29% 20% Total TOTAL 12,539 100% 1,948 16% 100% Sources Of Data Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System City of Edina Assessors Office Table 28 _ City Of Edina Single Family Homes Sold during January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2014 By Value Class Estimated Market Value July 2014 Single Homes Percent Homes Sold Estimated Family As Percent Homes Homes As Percent Market Value Homes Of All Sold Sold Of All Sold - $300,000 2,072 15% 310 15% 16% $300,000 - $499,999 5,534 39% 754 14% 39% $500,000 - $749,999 2,801 20% 427 150/0 22% $750,000+ 2,132 15% 457 21% 23% Total 12,539 100% 1,948 16% 100% Sources Of Data Hennepin County Geographic Information System lCity Of Edina Assessors Office 40 Detailed home sales by census block groups arranged by median age and median value can be seen in Tables 29 and 30. Higher percentages of sales are seen in older areas such as Pamela Park (23 %), St. Johns Park (20 %), Minnehaha Woods (20 %) and Highlands (19 %). With respect to value higher percentages are seen in the census block groups with mid -range values. Table 29 City of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During _ - January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2014 By Census Block Group- Arranged by Median Age July 2014 Median Age In Years All Single Of All Single- All Homes Sold Census Family Family Detached Single Family As Percent Block Group Homes Homes Homes Sold Of All Dewey Hill- Cahill 203 34 31 15% Parkwood Knolls 451 36 70 16% Promenade 13 38 2 15% Lewis Park 113 41 19 17% _ Indian Hills 366 45 50 14% Braemar Hills 261 46 38 15% Bredeson Park 147 46 20 14% Prospect Knolls 310 46 44 14% Walnut Ridge Park 278 46 43• 15% Creek Valley 301 47 32 11% Countryside 466 48 74 16% Lake Edina 158 49 23 15% The Heights 468 51 47 10% _ Comelia 515 54 71 ... 14% Fox Meadow 284 55 39 14% Interlachen -Todd Par 400 55 77 19% Garden Park 460 56 77 17% Lake Cornelia 387 56 52 13% Birchcrest 289 57 53 18% Normandale Park 498 58 55 11% Rosland Park 218 58 25 11% Garrison Lane 327 59 51 16% Highlands 286 59 54 19% St. Johns Park 331 60 65 20% Edinborou h Park 15 61 0 0% Grandview 370 61 50 14% Strachauer Park 341 61 53 16% Brookside 289 62 55 19% Pamela Park 333 62 76 23% Presidents 342 62 44 13% Southdale 11 62 2 18% Yorktown Park 26 63 2 8% Zenith 468 63 77 16% Concord 315 64 57 18% Minnehaha Woods 424 64 85 20% Creek Knoll 267 65 52 19% Mornin side North 397 68 58 15% Halifax- Townes 368 74 58 16% Sunn side -Arden Park 369 74 55 15% Mornin side South 248 79 38 15% Country Club 424 84 74 17% 66th Street 2 NA 0 0% TOTAL 12,539 57 1,948 16% Source of Data Edina City Assessor 41 Table 30 City of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 and June 30, 2014 By Census Block Group Arranged by Median Value July 2014 Median Value _ _ All Single Of All Single- All Homes Sold_ _ Census Family Family Detached Single Family As Percent _ Block Group Homes Homes Homes Sold Of All 66th Street 2 NA 0 0% Southdale 11 $176,100 2 18% Edinborou h Park 15 $193,200 0 0% Yorktown Park 26 $198,900 2 8% Presidents 342 $226,700 44 13% Zenith 468 $274,100 77 16% Strachauer Park 341 $297,500 53 16% Pamela Park 333 $310,300 76 23% Creek Knoll 267 $316,800 52 19% Brookside 289 $318,500 55 19% St. Johns Park 331 $326,800 65 20% Normandale Park 498 $326,960 55 11% Garrison Lane 327 $333,300 51 16% Birchcrest 289 $340,300 53 18% Rosland Park 218 $342,800 25 11% Grandview 370 $350,000 50 14% Garden Park 460 $380,900 77 17% Comelia 515 $406,300 71 14% Momin side North 397 $410,600 58 15% Creek Valle 301 $429,200 32 11% The Heights 468 $436,650 47 10% Momin side South 248 $439,550 38 15% Countryside 466 $446,600 74 16% _ Lake Cornelia 387 $449,900 52 13% Lake Edina 158 $458,400 23 15% Bredeson Park 147 $499,000 20 14% Lewis Park 113 $515,950 19 17% Prospect Knolls 310 $517,350 44 14% Indian Hills 366 $539,300 50 14% Braemar Hills 261 $566,300 38 15% Highlands 286 $571,600 54 19% Fox Meadow 284 $573,900 39 14% Interlachen -Todd Par 400 $632,200 77 19% Minnehaha Woods 424 $644,650 85 20% Concord 315 $682,000 57 18% Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 $683,000 31 15% Halifax- Townes 368 $702,100 58 16% Walnut Ridge Park 278 $742,150 43 15% Parkwood Knolls 451 $779,200 70 16% Sunn side -Arden Park 369 $836,500 55 15% Country Club 424 $902,850 74 17% Promenade 13 NA 2 15% TOTAL 12,539 $437,550 1,948 16% Source of Data Edina City Assessor 42 Sales of Single family Homes and change in Population of School Age Children Examination of residential patterns before and after the sales of single family homes can reveal the role that the sales play in population change in the city. Table 16 shows that the yield of school age children in a single family home in the city is 0.53 child per home. Table 31 lists the postsale yields, by census block group for the homes sold during January 1, 2011 - December 312013 time period. This table shows that 1,815 homes were sold and that 1,047 children now reside in those units for a yield of 0.58 students per home. This indicates that the sales of single family homes in the city do indeed result in an increase of school age children. Previous stud- ies conducted by the author in other first ring suburban cities has found that in most other cities home sales do not result in a gain of school age children. The city of Edina therefore is an exception to this trend. Table 31 City of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 And Yield of School Age Children SAC Residin g within Postsale By Census Block Group July 2014 All Single All SAC Yield Census Family Single Family Residing Within Of SAC Block Group Homes Homes Sold Postsale Postsale 66th Street 2 0 0 0.00 Birchcrest 289 52 35 0.67 Braemar Hills 261 37 28 0.76 Bredeson Park 147 19 18 0.95 Brookside 289 52 21 0.40 Concord 315 53 43 0.81 Cornelia 515 65 50 0.77 Country Club 424 71 56 0.79 Countryside 466 72 43 0.60 Creek Knoll 267 46 13 0.28 Creek Valley 301 29 20 0.69 Dewey Hill - Cahill 203 31 22 0.71 Edinborou h Park 15 0 0 0.00 Fox Meadow 284 35 24 0.69 Garden Park 460 72 55 0.76 Garrison Lane 327 47 31 0.66 Grandview 370 45 21 0.47 Halifax - Townes 368 54 15 0.28 Highlands 286 51 22 0.43 Indian Hills 366 46 45 0.98 Interlachen -Todd Par 400 70 22 0.31 Lake Cornelia 387 51 34 0.67 Lake Edina 158 23 13 0.57 Lewis Park 113 19 18 0.95 Minnehaha Woods 424 80 50 0.63 Mornin side North 397 54 29 0.54 Mornin side South 248 35 25 0.71 Normandale Park 498 52 21 0.40 Pamela Park 333 69 29 0.42 Park Lawn 0 0 0 0.00 Parkwood Knolls 451 65 27 0.42 Presidents 342 41 6 0.15 Promenade 13 2 0 0.00 Prospect Knolls 310 42 35 0.83 Rosland Park 218 24 9 0.38 Southdale 11 2 0 0.00 St. Johns Park 331 56 30 0.54 Strachauer Park 341 49 24 0.49 Sunn side -Arden Park 369 52 38 0.73 The Heights 468 44 38 0.86 Walnut Ride Park 278 37 22 0.59 Yorktown Park 26 2 2 1.00 Zenith 468 69 13 0.19 TOTAL 12,539 1,815 1,047 0.58 Sources Of Data: Edina City Assessor Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield School Districts 31 Tables 32 and 33 show the single family home postsale yield data by era built and value class. With respect to era built the highest postsale yield (0.76) occurred in the homes built from 1960 -79. The value class with the highest yield Post- sale (0.70) was in homes valued at less than $300,000. Table 32 _ City Of Edina City Of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During_ Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 And Yield of School Age Children SAC Residing within Postsale Estimated By Era Built April 2014 April 2014 K -12 Yield Single K -12 Students Of Students Yield Estimated Family In Single Single SAC In Single Of SAC Homes Family Homes Family Homes Family Family Homes In Single 192 0.70 Era Built Homes Sold Postsale Family Homes 0.60 Pre 1950 350 214 0.61 $750,000+ 1950-59 634 298 0.47 1960-79 479 366 0.76 1815 1047 Post 1980 352 169 0.48 TOTAL 1815 1047 0.58 Sources Of Data Edina City Assessor Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield School Districts Sources Of Data Edina City Assessor Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield School Districts Table 33 City Of Edina Single Family Homes Sold During January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013 And Yield of School Age Children SAC Residing within Postsale By Value Class Estimated Market Value April 2014 K -12 Yield Single K -12 Students Of Students Estimated Family In Single In Single Market Value Homes Family Homes Family Homes - $300,000 273 192 0.70 $300,000 - $499,999 710 424 0.60 $500,000 - $749,999 413 215 0.52 $750,000+ 419 216 0.52 TOTAL 1815 1047 0.58 Sources Of Data Edina City Assessor Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield School Districts 44 Construction of new single family homes Over the last decade the City of Edina has experienced an increase in new home construction. Much of this new con- struction involved the demolition of an existing home and the building of a new one. During the period between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2014, 267 permits were issued for construction of new single family homes. The permits issue by quadrant area are listed below Northeast 174 Northwest 72 Southeast 8 Southwest 13 Map O illustrates the distribution of these new home permits throughout the city. Map P pictures the locations of new home permits issued during the 2012 calendar year. By comparing the results of this study with previous research it is possible to determine that the number of school age children in the new homes built in 2012 is 150% of the number of children living in the homes prior to the demolition and new construction. 45 Legend • Bldg Permit MBlock Groups Map O Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, FXCP.nSl1S I LC Distribution of Building Permits For New Single Family Homes, Issued January 1, 2012 - June 30, 2014, Census Block Groups, City of Edina September 2014 ni— mime,- Thie min ie IN 46 Legend • Bldg Permit Block Groups Map P Source of Data: Edina City Geographic Information System, Excensus LLC Distribution of Building Permits For New Single Family Homes, Issued January 1, - December 30, 2012, Census Block Groups, City of Edina September 2014 ni —i.i -- Thic min is \I 47 To: Mayor and Council a� • ,��'f)RlVttl��4� • IHHH Agenda Item #: V. B. From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: Feb. 17, 2015 Information N Subject: "Speak Up, Edina" Report Action Requested: Receive report on January 2015 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion about liquor laws. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUpEdinaorQ. In January 2015, the discussion topic centered on Edina's liquor laws. In early 2014, the City also held a similar discussion asking residents' opinions about adjusting the existing ratio. In this year's online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Should Edina's liquor licensing standards be changed to eliminate the connection between food sales and alcohol sales? Why or why not? • Would you welcome bars or taprooms in Edina? Why or why not? • What sort of concerns do you have if the City's food -to- liquor sales ratio was to be eliminated? The discussion was open for comments between Dec. 31, 2014 and Feb. 2, 2015. During that time, 102 comments were made. Additionally, 1,692 users visited the site 2,164 times, garnering 6,913 page views. Note, during this same period, a discussion on the Redevelopment of the Former Public Works Site was also active. All but one commenters in this discussion were from Edina. Attached are the comments for both discussions. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Citv of Edir n H� x • Discussions Sign Upo • Ideas • Mcet6 En ii email address... Pascw password... or, Sigs%MAM: CoiTine i U Sip SiSi�gn In Li:,,,- t - Tweet 8haro 01 'peak Up, Eiid �0e�}�� S -in at • ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Edina Liquor Laws In November, Minneapolis residents voted to repeal a local ordinance that required restaurants outside of downtown Minneapolis and major conuuercial areas to adhere to a 70 -30 food -to -liquor sales ratio, which affected about 70 neighborhood restaurants. Other restaurants in the City were linnited to a 60- 40 ratio which was also repealed. Edina requires a food -to- liquor sales ratio of 60 -40 percent. ` 3 Topics r 102 An (( Closed 2015 -02 -02 l� L_ n L_ View Discussion Topic: Food -to -Liquor Should Edina's liquor licensing standards be changed to eliminate the connection between food sales and alcohol sales? Why or why not? 56 Responses 56 Responses Dennis FernLes about 1 month ago Yes, climinate the requirement. Residents are doing a good job of balancing this on their own. 14 Supports comment... to Dennis Femkes Hitabeth s about 1 month ago Yes, eliminate the requirement. The city has no business regulating private businesses. I 1 Supports comment... Reply to Elizabeth x Shea Huston about 1 month ago Keep the government out of our hair! We can figure out where we want to dine just as well as business owners can figure out how they want to run their business. The last thing Ave need is more government intrusion. When was the last time we solved a problem by REMOVING laws? 3 Supports comment... _ - --- - _ --_ -- -- - __ _ - /• � Reply to Shea Fktston Marlys Granhiit about t month ago I believe that 60 -40 is adequate and should not be changed.... 0 Supports Lcc Heckenlaible about 1 mouth ago Care to elaborate? 0 Supports comment ... _.. comment... Reply to Lee Heckenlaible _ _ � Reply to Marlys Grant .limStrondsere about 1 nonth ago With communities around us eliminating the food/drink ratios, i believe we put our business fliends at a disadvantage if we continue our regulation. Repeal it, and put us on equal terms with our neighbors. Maybe also ask our business owners what they think... 9 Supports comment... iemni Skrenner about 1 mouth ago Our restaurants need to compete. IfMpls has changed their laws, we need to do the same! 4 Supports comment ... Reply to .ftm Strombwg f Reply to Lonni Skrentner Anonymous Resident about 1 month ago Edina could issue a limited annowrt of Liquor Only / Tap Room licenses . Could construct an ordinance : each Liquor Only license mast be used >1 pule radars S-om any other tap room license. 1 Support Matt Touran =eau 15 days ago We're talking about small establishments, and there should not be a limit on distance as we're already going to have limited areas that they can be. A mile limitation would create a monopoly for the existing establislunents as Edina is roughly a 5 by 5 mile town. 0 Supports comment... comment.... - - — - Reply to Matt Tourangeau j Reply to Anonymous Resident Katie Nelson about I month ago Yes! Eliminate the requirement - it is so autiquaited and could potentially steer restaurants away fi•om Hying to set tip shop in Edina 8 Supports comment... -- -- Reply to Kati Ie e Nelson Anonymous Resi&nt about 1 mouth ago 50/50 sounds snripler and easier to enforce. Notwithstanding, it is not an exact parity as one meal and one drink are not priced at the same ratio across bar /restaurants . Ie the same customer behavior at two different restaurants would not result in the salve calculation toward the ratio. 0 Supports Cinth•Stanton about I month ago Wiry do we want to hinder businesses from doing business? If the brew houses, restaurants, retail shoppes want to pay the rent to be in our area, why not let tlrent We all benefit. It's not like we are asking a brothel or bath house to set up shop on 50th & France. 3 Supports comment... - Reply to Cindy Stanton comment... Reply to Anonymous Resident ,Ntchin Ogmrak about I month ago Govenunent, I believe has more important matters to deal with than to determine the ratio of food to liquor a person should be allowed to purchase in a restaurant. That determination should be left up to the individual. What Purpose does the ratio serve, except to add more burdens to business owners. We have liquor laws regarding driving and they do not have to be reinforced by Edina laws. Please spend tunic on more crucial issuses than a ratio of food to liquor law. By the way, how does Edina inrplemennt such a rediculous law? By weight? By cost? 5 Supports Hein (k Rno about I month ago Thank you Eloquently said. I get so hi-itated with the ridiculousness of what I believe to be stupid intervention by government that I can't state my position kindly. Government needs to go do the work of the people and quit frittering their time away on petty antiquated laws like this. 2 Supports jean 1 6%idabout 1 month ago The 60 -40 ratio applies to the animal gross receipts of the establishment, not to the customer. You can go into an Edina establishment right now and order nothing but intoxicating beverages (unless the establishment's own policy prevents it). 0 Supports .K 1� 'Hot Hutchens 29 days ago While this is true and loan is correct, try to nun a decent wine or beverage program while maintaining these averages it can't be done there are no food sold locally that could keep ratios with a decent beverage program as food here does not have a Louis die Xtlf, Grand Cnu Champagne, or Fist Growth Bordeaux equivalent. 0 Supports comment... [Re to Hein de Hoog 1 comment... Reply to MelH, Ogurak Joel Stegner, Comtnunih,wlun tee r about 1 month ago I thank that brew houses have a place in Fdira, but that there should be an expectation that they sell food to go with the alcohol, or they si iply simply become another form of a bar. When a brew pith proposes to come into tie cone iun ty, to get a license, perhaps all they should be expected to do is l ) have a reasonable food nnenu and 2) report their level ofalcohnl sales. The city has other issues to address with this new retail concept. Their market is heavily geared toward the under age 35 group, which uvans that there migjnt be an issue witli college aged students sunder slue age 21 in mined groups being served. Brew pubs are also interested in the "take out" business - would that be allowed? Would brew pubs be allowed or encouraged to sell their product through Edina municipally owned liquor stores? Pleasc go beyond changing the number or lifting the limits to think of this issue more broadly, so additional regulation is required down the road. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Joel Stegner li ha about I month ago The 60 -40 ratio is butting die types of restraints/bars that the younger professional Edina residents are looking for. There are many times when my wife and I meet downtown for a quick drink and snack before a movie and my ratio tuna out to be none like 20 -80 (food -to- liquor) How can you expect the restaut ant to manage this when the customer is driving the ratio. 5 Supports Joan i d i%id about I month ago They are managing it now. New restaurants are opening. Except for taprooms, which many people seem to want, and which would requite ordinance changes unrelated to the 60 -40 ratio, thi igs seem to be working now. 0 Supports comment... comment... _ - i I Reply to joan 1. da%4d I Reply to Michael G Lisa nelson about I month ago 1 support repeal, but I do think we have to keep an eye out to prevent any area of the city beconwig an Edina version of the Warehouse district. 1 Support Lee HeckenlailA about 1 month ago Zoning laws and the individual approval of businesses takes care of that 0 Supports ;comment... -� LReply to Lee Heckenlaible comment... Reply to Lisa Nelson Sarah lyuest about 1 month ago Eliminate the requirement. Edina businesses are losing out to nearby coin nu pities. We already saw that by the laws regarding happy hour. Lets focus on being competitive with the suiotuading connmunities and bring in bttsiness. This would bring in both custonners and new restaturants where they can generate more profit. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Sarah Wuest I,ee bleckenlail>te about t month ago City of Edina has consistently stated that it needs to attract nnillennials. Speaking as a millennial who bought a house here 10 years ago, the liquorlfrnod ratio is something that desperately steeds to go. There are visually no neighborhood restaurants because smaller establiulunents depend lneavdy on liquor sales (see SW Mpls, ie. Tibia). Brew Pubs are a booming pant of the Twin Cities economy and are providnig tens of millions ofdollars to their respective conununilies. Mere are over 30 that have popped up in recent years, all with tremendous success. Surly is a prinne exannple. LTD in Hopkins, Excelsior brewing in Excelsior, Lucid in Mtka, Lift Bridge in Stilhvater, Fulton in Mpls....die list goes oil. All have provided a trennendous annount of jobs (30 -200) and arc by NO meats troublesome. Brew pubs are the opposite, they typically attract tourists and visitors from all over the cities and beyond. Currently, Edina is viewed as a contniunity that says "no" to most change purely for the sake of saying no and not offering any legitimate reason for doing so. Currently the nnost popular 'bar" fbr Edina is, conically, Bunnys, in SLP. Approval Ibr individual bars/restaurants is done on an individual basis which ensures that bars won't be popping up on every corner. In order to expand an aging tax base, the food /drink ratio needs to be abolished and brew pubs need to be approved. 12 Supports Ilan Hortensius 15 clays ago 1 agree, I am also a millennial and when 1 go out I fiequently spend as much on drinks as on food. Not because I am drinking a lot, but because I drink fancy, expensive beer. I innagine it's good for business if they can sell expensive beer to nle! 0 Supports comment... comment... LReply to Lian Hortensius Reply to Lee Heckenlabble� Ruth lnhnstan about I month ago As a restaurant owner at 50th and France for the last 14 years my partner Jayne Reid -Walen and I believe that the 60 -40 ration is difficult at best. The cost of Beer and Wire have grown significantly over the years. Otu- customers desire a variety of wines and beers and we are unable to deliver this to them due to the restrictions. '11ne law is antiquated and needs to be removed. We love yet to hear any sound reasoning for the law as it pertains to current life style and the hospitality industry. We agree with the City ofMiuteapolis whom overwhelmingly voted to change the cities rules and regulations regarding the sale of liquor at restaurants. We now find that our competitors across the street are at a distinct advantage and this will have a negative affect on our business. We urge the city council to adopt this change and to do it quickly. 10 Supports it 1� .lnritui 01genlbdh achnio about I month ago Thanks for your feedback, Ruth! I'm happy to get the opinions of 50th & France restaurateur! It's a good point that 50th & Prance is unique in that a highly successful commercial area straddles the border of two cities, with diflerent laws. 0 Supports Hein de Howe about I month ago We are a urobile society so 50th and France with diRrent laws across the street isn't unique at all What is unique is Edina's anti rated laws. Look, I don't even drink but as a tax payer I want drinkers to subsidize my convnunity. Now all the revenue is going to all the connnunities that border Edina. Bring the money home! 1 Support comment.. . Reply to Jordan Giigenbach comment... Reply to Ruth johnston Mark Daum about 1 month ago I agree the ratio needs to be eliminated. Not only is it an antiquated law, it denies business growth in Edina. Why would anyone choose to operate or patronize a restaurant in out- city versus St Louis Park or Minneapolis? I've lived here my entire life, and have spend thousands of dollars on food and drink at places just outside our city due to the provincial laws regarding liquor sales. Why not encourage us to spend it here in Edina? 2 Supports c onune n t ... i j Reply to Mark Daum matt anderson about I month ago I support a repeal of this tole. Ifan establishment only serves alcohol I g=uess I doti t have a problem with that. I doti t think that Hina would have the types ofcha Ile nges as a bar in Dinkytown does. The demographics of Edina just don't support tunderagc college students trying to sneak in. I think government should focus on infrastructure so we cam get to our' stores and restauuamts without severely dantngdng ow' vehicles. I worry about being palled over at night driving home fi-onn work because I'm swerving to avoid potholes. 2 SupporLs comment... - - Reply to matt anderstxn Din Atkins about I month ago Repeal. Not to be competitive but because you respect bus. Also repeal the law stating that no more than 15% of seating can be stools. How insane is that? It only underscores the finite control somebody (that drinks they are either smarter than me, or more moral than me) wants to exert in the name of their intellcctuaVnnoral arrogance. Sony, but we are all smart enough and good enough to figure this out ou our own. Respect that. Respect the intelligence and moral fiber of your citizens. 5 Supports comment... — — - -- - - - — A Reply to Dan Atkins 1 Francy Rtatson about I mmmh ago Wow. folks want then drinks in especially the 50th & France area. Interesting that restauuants are really anxious to move in to Edina despite the current restrictions... wonder why'? Could it be that we don't need to change anything after all. I am for letting Minneapolis and Hopkins handle the bars and let Edina stay a Beat destination with great Restaurants. I like that our destinations are fan-dy fiiendly and we don't have to have our kids and grand kids viewing rowdy behavior. 0 Supports Dennis Fernkes about I month ago I find misbehaving children more of an annoyance than achnits enjoying a drink and a meal. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Dennis Femkes Ice HeckentailA about I month ago If l7dina had the ability to snake sometlung good, better, would you support it? All other surrounding cities are evolving and doing so accordance with the requests of the (respected) citi7ens. Unfortunately, Edina will not continue to be a great destination with great restatuants. For proof look at Linden Hills, Hopkins, and South Minneapolis just east of France. ThaPs where all the new restauantsBrew Pubslctc are going ... NOT Edina. 2 Supports Dennis Fernkes about 1 month ago 1 find misbehaving children more ofan annoyance than adults enjoying a drink and a nncal. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Lee Heckenlaible comment... i Reply to Francy Matson I Jason Katenb ors about I mouth ago Yes, we are all adults and government gets the benefits of the taxes they bring in. I Support comment... [Reply to Jason Kalenbom Diane "C5 about I month ago For too many years die City of Edina practiced archaic liquor laws, then finally Happy Hour came to be. Yippee! Now there is talk about bringing more competition, more revenue for owners, more tax income for Edina based on changing food/liquor ratio in general. We love the idea of doing all three, but so far the majority of changes have taken place on the cast side of the city. The Southdale- France Ave con-idor and general area for traffic needs to be taken into coils ideration.While new housing continues to saturate that general area and around Centennial Lakes, so too will there be more restaurants /drinking establishment be added and that's not a bad thing.. For the moment though, lets proceed with a little caution and limit the number of licenses for future taprooms with limited food nienu. Bars only do not seem like a good fit for Edina. -- Diane and Jack Lacy 0 Supports comment... Reply to Diane Lacy Robert Hare about ) mouth ago I support the proposed change of the law in Edina. We have wonderkil restaurants doing business in Edina and the should do whatever we can to allow the business owners to be successful in our city. Their success results in employment opportunities, taxes to support our city, and entertainment for our residents and visitors. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Robert Hate Chris Fotdcr about i month ago Yes, it's tinie to eliminate this. It is antiquated and unnecessary. 4 Supports comment... Reply to Chris Fowler Patrick Finleyatout 1 month ago cWe just approved a change in die ratio. Leave it at 60- 40..Let's just leave it for a year or two until we get sonne experience and more data on the results of the new ratio. 0 Supports comment... - G I Reply to Patrick Finley Scott Vogel about 1 11101101 ago I'm definitely in favor of making a change to remove the tie between food and liquor sales. I don't have any concern whatsoever that Edina is going to nun into a rowdy bar scene. Uptown has [flat captive crowd. Going out for a glass of wine or a couple of beers writh fi•iends shouldn't be looked at negatively. Good restaurants, taprooms, and even the occasional sports bar all add to the great conurnunity that we have here in Edina. 1 Support comment... Reply to Scott Vogel, Da%id Kruc.cr 30 days ago Please repeal this outdated ordinance. It would also be nice to allow people to have a drink on a sidewalk patio. 1 Support comment... —� ..___ --- — - --- - -_ -_-_ Reply to Da%id Krueger Tim Hutchens 29 days ago I was going to keep quiet but I didn't see anyone speaking fi•om a restaurant point of view. This is a sad and depressing state of business(IN EDINA when it comes to restaurants), and why are there so few quality or independant restuarants here, mostly what Minneapolis considers fine dining restaurants and hotels for over twenty years (here Minneapolis, and on the west coast). While you are doing two things much as Minneapolis has done both for years and hindered business and resluarant development, as if we are still dragging a foot in prohibition. 1) As a city we are missing out on keeping people in their 20- 80's in Edina who enjoy beer and wine getting together and socializing without traveling a great distance to find decent offereing; as it elenninating wine bats, tap roonm and brew pubs (which are driving growth and tax revenue in roost major and second ring cities across the county), which always Waits tine neighbor feel and connnuunity that which is added by paving interesting alternatives to chains. 2) Causing restaurants to have terrible wine and beers lists, as if I or a customer bought a decent bottle of wine S 100- 500(or in a celebration nxdtg)lc bottles, Champagne, port, and so forth) in a good restaurant they woud then need to sell nxilitple meals to make up for the wine sales (I am speaking as a previous somvu, and F and B Director here) your profits are made in wine sales, particularly as Minnesotans have a hard time paying very much for food. Reading the conunents above, I guess I have no idea where these "wonderful restaurants" are? the current norm in Edina is mostly chains with gnno food delivered in food neck likes Cisco and US FOODS, with little love or awareness of the local fiesh ingrcdiants available. This is not good nor what we should support, and or demand from our restaurants, it is almost unbelievable how far behind we are when it tonnes to a food scene, and this is just another elenient that k not helping. I can nanle well over 5 restaurants on France Ave that get food fiom the mentioned food senni -trucks (which came from a processingplant/warehouse not a firm) and also do not recycle, compost, or use sustainable practices. This would be boycotted in a real food (or one that cared about it's food supply and health), but here it is the nornn, sad. 3 Supports Dan Atkins 28 days ago Curious, how many, or what percentage, of the current Edina restaurants have the owner onsite? Does this correlate to a good experience? 0 Supports Tim Hutchens 15 days ago While "good experience" and a good restaurant are two different thingg, you night have a good experience at Chuck E Cheese but they are not serving- food. From during in most of them I woukl say 0% have on site owners, as I have only been back fiving here a year but grew up here generally I leave rather then dine here. Really a owner on -site doesn't make a difference, as they generally know little about food and or wine. A truly good restaurant will have a professionally trained chef on- site(CIA, ICC, training local schools are like puppy mills) watching every food element that comes through the door. Generally a good gm and or a sommelier oversees the beverage prograns(locally both the training is Lacking as owners don't understand food and hence hire kids to get the cheapest labor possible. To do what should be left to professionals, while: ordering cheap GMO garbage. Sorry it seers my above statements are not clear as typing in these boxes is slow and everything comes tluough. I am sorry I am not a writter or proof reader. 0 Supports c onune n t ... rReply to Dan Atkins 1 comment... _. _._ -- — Reply to Tim Hutchens Nate Wohl 28 days ago As displayed around the world, especially overseas & the pub scene in the UK, I think pubs or bats can be a strong benefit to conununities when allowed to do so. Drinking takes place there, but their vakte is in the social for u i it helps establish. I think these ratios of policing the alcohol to food sales reflect almost a prohibition -age mindset. It really is that simple. Pubs shoukl be able to feel fi-ee serving any type of menu they wish to accommodate their patrons. I believe it shoukl be diverse and not restricted to a ratio. 4 Supports comment... 1. Reply to Nate Wohl plau Tourangeau 15 &ys ago Not to be redundant but the Law is archaic! With the new competition from Total Wine maybe Edina should close up then- liquor stores and add off sale with the restaurants and &lina could tax those sales with absolutely NO overhead and profit. Now that the Sunday Liquor sales is going to get repealed this year it should be a no brainier. Take home a bottle of your favorite wine or growler or two from a local pub. 2 Supports comment... R Z BarbaraFsa Vallcur 15 diys ago Yes 0 Supports comment... Bat Nit a La Vallow 15 days ago Yes 0 Supports comment... Reply to Matt Tourangeau Reply to Barbara La Vall - . / I Reply to Barbara La Valleur Fide Andersen 15 days ago Eliminate the requirement. The city has no business regulating private businesses. Wiry reject father revenue 0 Supports comment... Reply to Eric Anderson William WNW 15 days ago Edina's approach to liquor is anti oa(ed, the 60/40 restriction no longer appropriate. It is not unusual for my wife and I to go out with friends, spend $10- 12 on food and order a fancy martini for $12. It is not worth the bother to continue tweakilg the ratio - 70/30, 60/40/, 50/50, etc. This restriction is no longer an appropriate way to ineasure or regulate thriving restaurant businesses that we enjoy visiting! It's tare to dump the food/beverage ratio altogether! 1 Support Comment... Reply to William David Paul \1'ahhour 15 days ago This might have made sense ninny years ago but a beer is no longer fifty cents. In addition, what does enforcement of this law cost the city? 0 Supports comment... Reply to Paul Walthour Chris lircmcr 15 days ago I think it is time; to eliiiinate this rule. Perhaps it served a propose in the past, but now it is simply a hindrance to our restaurants. 0 Supports Comment. _.. CReply to Chris Bremen Barry Rosenthal 15 days ago Definitely remove the 60 -40 iequirennent. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Barry Rosenthal I ki Tim Ilutchens 15 flays ago It seems these posts are edited and do not all of my comments are posted, so I will no longer be commenting as if it is edited what is the point ofa public forum? Edina as always is a boring, overly scrubed contrived environment unaware of the work] at large. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Tim Hutchens ;Mary Porter atJanuary30, 2015 at 12:43pmCST Please repeal the ordinance, Our restaurants can police thennelves and they need to he competitive with surrounding restaurants. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Mary Porter pia _ Wiles at Rebruary 02, 2015 at 2:30pm CST Repeal the requirement. And while we're at it, support your legislators who want to repeal the antiquated no Sunday liquor sales law. 0 Supports comment... LReply to Mary Wile Sign Up Connect email address... Sign MP_I Participants En V, .:,'FiT, .3 City of F-clina Haug • Discussions Sign • Ideas • Mectunes Email Suwe�s email address... Pascw d„ISl e password... or, 5i "h: ColtleLij t Si i Sign Ih Like (fl Tweet Share 1r1A o� a - U-P- :11 ► SHARE your feedback,! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is cw-rently closed. Discussion: Edina Liquor Laws In November, Minneapolis residents voted to repeal a local ordinance that required restaurants outside of downtown Minneapolis and major commercial areas to adhere to a 70 -30 food -to- liquor sales ratio, which affected about 70 neighborhood restarants. Other restaurants in the City were limited to a 60- 40 ratio which was also repealed. Fdina requires a food -to- liquor sales ratio of 60 -40 percent. L 3 Topics 102 Answers 1 closed 2015 -02 -02 View Discussion Topic: Bars and Ta rp ootns Would you welcome bars of taprooms in Edina? Why or why not? 25 Responses 25 Responses Dennis Fcrulses about I month ago Yes, people are already going elsewhere and we are losing their business. 3 Supports comment... 4 [Reply to Dennis Femkes I Dizabeth s about 1 month ago Yes! People go to Buimy's and other nearby bars / taprooms and Edina is foolishly letting neighboring conrnunities have the taxable utconic as well as encouraging people to leave the city. Silly Edina, 5 Supports comment... Reply to Elizabeth x DaNid Frenket about 1 month ago Bunny's has a legacy and a strong neigbborhood following that you won't see in Edina. Keep in ntind floe churn in restaurants. If you want a stable retail area I would look for balance between restaurants and other retail. General Sports on 50th(France has outlived everything else nn that area except Lrnds and the post office. 1 Support comment... - / Reply to David Frenkel lAmud Skrentner about I month ago I agree with David above. We need a balance - but a couple of bars or taprooms or a microbrewety would be fine. 0 Supports comment. lReply to Lonni Skrentner .1hu Sirombere about 1 month ago I have to admit to loving tlne'mix' ofrestau rant and bar combination in tine area of Edina that I live in, and doubt that I'd go to a tap -room in that area. But, I'm also guessing that there are other areas in our community that would welcome tl>1t addition to the neighborhood. If allowed, its success would have to stand on its own merits. 0 Supports comment... Anon -mous Resident about t month ago Edina could issue a limited amount of Liquor Only/Tap Room licenses, like one per year up to a max of 3. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jlm Stromberg Reply to Anonymous Resident Katie Nelson about t month ago Yes - I would love bars /tap rooms in Edina! 3 Supports comment... Reply to Katie Nelson OWT7 Joel Stegner, Community w1unteer about I month ago I support tap rooms in Edina - but not bars - and only ifthey serve food. Ifaicohol is their only revenue stream, they have a built in financial incentive to push customers to buy more alcolol ilkan they really want to drink - creating enforcement issues. Ordering something offthe food menu also would discourage rapid consumption of alcohol, which causes higher spikes in blood alcohol levels. 1 Support cownent . . . Reply to Joel Stegner lttichael G about I month ago Yes - I can see it sow.. The Edina Tap Room, packed with professionals discussing their latest mergers and acquisitions while sipping local Edina brewed beers.. Just imagine A beer call "Every Day I Need Attention' is bottled and sold nationally. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Michael G Sarah 11'uest about 1 month ago Taprooms draw in people of all ages wltich brings people into our community. I strongly support having taprooms in Edina as I believe it selves up the impression that Edina is forward thinking and offers something for everyone. Lintiti ng the ntunber is an option to ensure a balance of businesses in the city 2 Supports comment... 1 IRepiy to Sarah wuest Alan Solvnties about t month ago 1 don't see a need for bars without food, but I favor letting the n>arket determine the success. I also think tap rooms would be a great addition to Edina, attracting younger people: to the area. And with all the new bike lanes and sidewalks, transportation will not be a concern! 0 Supports comment... ply to Alan Solyntjes Heckenlalble about t mouth ago Top Rooms are one of the biggest boons to the Twin City's econonly. Nearly every city bas a Tap Roonn/Brew House that bas attracted anywbere from 30 -200+ jobs and brought millions to tine respective citys economy. Examples include: Study in N Mpls, Fulton in DT Mpls, Lift Bridge in Stillwater, Excelsior Brewing in Excelsior, Lyalake Brewing in Uptown, Ilarriet Brewing in Mpls by Lake Harriet, LTD Brewing in Hopkins, Lucid Brewing in Mtka and the list goes on. Taprooms bring tourists and visitors fionn all over the state and beyond while also catering to locals and giving back to local cotmnnu hies. As I stated in a previous post about food/]i uor ratios; stagnation and reluctance to change will cause Edina to fall behind its neighboring cities and lose out on ever expanding tax bases. 1 Support comment... — -- Reply to Lee Heckenla we matt andersun about t mouth ago Yes. I feel that establishments which are local and close discourage dnuik driving, not enforcement of tbod to ligtKn- ratio. I personally would go out more to have ftun and network if there were close, local places. 1 disagree that bars who don't serve food become problems. If 1'nn not interested in a product, I'm not going to bury it despite incentives and promotions. If I'm not interested in a venue, I'm not going to patronize it despite incentives and promotions. I think it would be great to have taprooms and/or bars in the area. It would provide a local alternative and hopefully cheaper experience to large taxi fares fi-om other locations. 2 Supports comn.v nt ... Reply to matt anderson l Mark Daum about I month ago I agree tap rooms are becoming very popular and think they could be addressed the same as bars and restaurants. Sinnply require tap roonns to offer food. The few tones I visited different tap rooms in Minneapolis, they have had a food buck outside the business... And they were doing great business! It confirms that many itllot most people who visit tap rooms also want a bite to eat. The city could choose to allow growler sales, or otter to carry the beers in the Edina Liquor Stores. 1 Support comment... Reply to Mark Daum .lason Kalenlnrn almnu 1 month ago I would love tap rooms in Edina. It would be at least a once a week destination spot, especially at 50th and France. We should subsidize it even. Imagine the cash during the art fair. An easy 30 K to the coffers! I Support comment... Reply to Jason Kalenbom Diane t,acyabout 1 month ago Lilted licenses for taprooms located in various areas around Edina, not just on the East side of the city is a good idea. Should serve a small food menu. Bars only do not seem in keeping with the general envirotnnent in Edina. Diane and Jack Lacy 0 Supports comment... Reply to Diane Lacy Chris roller about I mouth ago While I worry about additional development of any kind in Edina without some soil of dedicated attention being paid to the citys traffic management plan, I would wholeheartedly support the introduction ofa bar or two and definitely a taproom There's a huge revenue opportimity here that should not be passed 1111. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Chris Fowled Joan I dcil about I month ago A taproom requires an establislurent that has a brewer's license. Which zoning districts in Edina permit breweries? City code currently prohibits any brewer fi-om having a liquor license in the city. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Joan I. da Nd Scutt \'n -el about I month ago Outside ofa taproom, I don't believe there's even enough demand fora place in Edina that only serves alcohol and not food. 1 just don't see that being much ofa problem Places are going to draw an older or more professional crowd that are looknrg for establishments that offer both food and alcohol. 0 Supports comment... f Reply to Scott Vogel] Nate wohl 28 clays ago As displayed around the world, especially overseas & the pub scene in the UK, I think pubs or bars can be a strong benefit to communities when allowed to do so. Drinking takes place there, but their value is in the social fommi it helps establish. When done the right way (obviously not a rowdy college bar) I think it should be allowed. It could allow for owners of these establishments to rent out for hosting private social events as well. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Nate Wohl I) lc )lkrsoo 15 days ago Yes, stop nuking true take my business to Mpls 0 Supports comment... i Reply to Edc Anderson William Da \id 15 days ago The food & beverage industry will always evolve. It's time; to allow Tap Roons, wineries and distilleries too that brew beverages on site for conswnption and limited sales. Tliey should be allowed in the zoning districts where commercial and industrial businesses prosper. 1 am not supportive ofbars that sell drinks only and no food. While that was fii n in my post- college years, I'd rather spend muy time in a good restaurant with fi-iends and family. 0 Supports comment... Reply to William DaHd� Chris Brener 15 darns ago Tap rooms would be fine but they should serve food, too. And they should not displace the nice mix of businesses we have now, or add to existing parking problerss. I would allow them in the more industrial areas. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Chris Bremer Karcii 1;1;15 clays ago I support allowing nnicrobieweries aril Lapioons in Edina. lacy will bring additional revenue into the city and demonstrate that Edina is a contemporary city; experience shows that they otien btuld conunwuty with new problems. Yet, they should be zoned for areas with food establishments and /or permits fix food trucks, much like in Northeast Mpls, so that patrons can constune food with their drink without (lie brewery/taproom having to enter the restaurant business. 0 Supports Corume n t . . Reply to Karen E. Mary Porter nt January 30, 2015 at 12:53pm CST I think taproonn should be allowed as long as they serve some food and do not directly compete with the great restaurants we Cwrently have on the eastern portions of the city. It could be helpful to set a linut to the number and locations - not close to schools, etc. 0 Supports comment... G. Reply to Mary PorierJ Sign Up Conneet email address... Sign Up Participants City of F- ling ii x 1 F -F�11e • Discussioi>_s Sign m' • Ideas • Meetings Eirail tube email address... F ascw ,tAi ,tri ,e password... or, Sig i .h: Coitt�c iQrl U Sicrn Up�Sign In Tweet Share d U, E d-! 0 MFMAOF 'I', UP—N ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion chaimel is cLuTcntly closed. Discussion: Edina Liquor Laws In November, Minneapolis residents voted to repeal a local ordinance that required restaurants outside of downtown Minneapolis and major commercial areas to adhere to a 70 -30 food -to- liquor sales ratio, which affected about 70 neighborhood restawrank Other restawants in the City were limited to a 60- 40 ratio which was also repealed. Edina requires a food -to -liquor sales ratio of 60 -40 percent. 3 Topics 102 Answers Closed 2016-02-02-1 View Discussion Topic: Concerns What sort of concerns do you have if the City's food -to- liquor sales ratio was to be eliminated? 21 Responses 21 Responses Dennis Fernkes about 1 month ago I have no concerns. It is well known that Edina police are aggressive at policing and citing drivers who are wider the ur8uence. 3 Supports comment... Reply to Dennis Femkes Fli/abeth C about 1 month ago No concerns. Support Comment .. . Reply to Elizabeth x bha%id F'renkel about 1 month ago It has been suggested that Edina impose a restai ant liquor tax. Maybe lifting the food requirement would be the compromise for imposing a liquor tax 3 Supports ,comment... -- -- _ _....._... ..__.-- -- -- -- -- _... _ / Reply to Datiid Frenkel Jim Strombrr¢ about 1 month ago 1 would be interested in die viewpoint of law enforcement on this whole issue. AND, on a related note, I'd be curious what Edina thinks of lifting the Sunday sales ban that's being discussed at the Legislature - does (lie City oppose or endorse this idea? 3 Supports comment... G [ Reply to Jim Stromberg r� Joel Ste[rner.ComnuuiityNulunteer about 1 month ago While I commend police for stopping and citing drivers who are under the influence, they do not have to the ability to stop drivers who drink too mach at home or at a public establishment and turn the ignition key. As we open more places where liquor call be pw chased in the city, the "prevention" issue becomes larger. When it conies to enforcing the liquor laws, this is a very significant city financial and staffing issue. For those of use who don't drunk or ever have more thin one, it scenes like the costs of enforcement should be carried by those who sell and consuune. That means licensing fees, taxes and fines for establishments that are nnost problematic. I would favor looking more carefully at the impact of alcohol on the quality of life in Edina. It recently was announced that Minnesota dropped in the state health ratings because ofoutr state has more of problem with binge drinking than most other states in the country, in conunparison to other health indicators, where Ave tend to end up in the top S. Does Edina have tine same issue as the rest of the state? Maybe not, but 1 don't think we have the information that is needed to make that deternnination. Last night, the Edina Community Health Commission decided to make "binge drinking' its top focus area for 2015, so there is some sense that it is tine for the City to look at alcohol use in Edina to determine how we are doing and what we might want to bo do differently. When we open new outlets for alcohol sales, it is the tine to think very careful about tie use and abuse ofalcolnol as to not create any new challenges. Last night, the Community Health Conin fission identified binge drinking as a priority focus for 2015. We lack local data at this point, but did this based on the study that suggested Minnesota was among the states with the highest level of binge drinking nationally - in contrast to most positive health indicators, where we are ntunber 1 or in the top five. The vast majority of heavy drinkers actively deny they have a problem, when it is apparent to others that they do. Could a city like Edina be in denial regarding this issue among its residents? 3 Supports comment... LReply to Joel Stegner "Michael ( about 1 mouth ago No Concerns. The Edina City Administrators do a great job and adjustments can always be made in the future, if we start seeing a bad pattern appear. 0 Supports comment ... - sa 'elsnn about t month ago Don!t want a warehouse district evolving in Edina. 0 SuppotiS comment... Merin 02ni A about t month ago None! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Michael G Reply to Lisa Nelson __ __ _ Reply to Merin Ogurak IRe Ileekenlaible about I month ago Zero Concerns. Well, maybe one; how long will it take to repeal the current ratio so that we don't fall behind our neighboring cities even fiu Chet? 2 Supports comment... -- -- — - -- - -� Reply to Lee Heckenlaible Unn Atkins about I month ago My concern is that if the City doesn't "get with it" we will be viewed as a Nanny City. Unable to decide for ourselves what is in otu- own best interest and we need others to make up arbitrary rules that attempt to control our behavior because we are not really adults. I Support comment... Reply to Dan Atkins am .lason Kabenborn about 1 month ago No concerns. It would be awesome to renxrve these antiquated rules. Let's get rid of Sunday restrictions next! 1 Support comment... -- ! Reply to Jason Kalentom Diane lace about 1 nontli ago Let's not tax those to death who choose to spend their money drinking and dinning in Edina. Making some changes in the food/liquor ratio mi_= it help accomplish keeping these kinds of taxes lower. Sunday restrictions need to be eliminated too. -- Diane and Jack Lacy 1 Support comment... L Reply to Diane Lacy J Chris Fonier about I numih ago My rcal concern is that we don't do it... 2 Supports comment... Reply to Chris iz wA ; Patrick Foteyabout I month ago cMy concern would be many more intoxicated drivers on our streets thereby endangering our citizens. We have many ederly out driving and they need resonsible drivers around them. We have this walking/ bicycle agenda which puts many more residents on or near our streets. Let's keep the streets safe for them.onoicnt... 0 Supports comment... Reply to Patrick Finley Andi exR trOPll 28 days ago Have no concerns, the Genic is out of the bottle. Edina needs to request fi•om its state legislators that we get the ability to tax all alcohol sales, bats, restaurants, hotels, liquor stores in order to offset some of the massive infrastructure & capital costs it is incurring. Local road cons[ruction, Braemar being remodeled, paying off the Public Works facility. My property taxes went up by I I % just this year before the school district bond referendum. City needs to diversify its revenue stream or there will be a lot of empty homes in Edina 0 Supports comment... Reply to Andrew) Brown] Mark Daum 15 days ago My only concern is Edina continues to lag behind our neighboring cities in ow• attitudes and laws regarding bars and restaurants. We have lost revenue and tax base for the past 50+ years due to our lack of acceptance of these cstablishnncnts. One only has to remind themselves of the booming business St Louis Park has done on Excelsior Blvd over the years with Edina residents who had to alternative in our own community. As for the safety ofelder drivers that Patrick referred to, I ann less worried about a drunk driver on Vernon than I am an elderly driver in Jeny's parking lot. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Mark Daum Fide Anderson 15 days ago none 0 Supports comment... - - -- -- -- - - � Reply to Eric Anderson William Da%id 15 days ago No concerns about eliminating the food/beverage ratio. Bartenders & restaurantetus already take precautions to prevent over - sewing customers. 71icy bear a large burden already. It would be a nice touch for the restaurants to coordinate with taxi cabs for a guaranteed ride home to prevent drinking and driving. A coordinated program with posters on the doors and bathrooms would call attention to the program. In such a case, would also be helpfiil if the City or restaurants allowed cars to park overnight in parking lots without being ticketed or towed. 0 Supports comment... _ —._ . — Reply to WiMam DaJd William Dmid 15 days ago Is it possible for the Edina "theater to get a liquor license? Sometimes it would be nice to have a beer and watch a movie. 0 Supports co,nme n t ... Reply to William Daud Chris Bremer 15 days ago We already have a lot of vehicular traffic in and around our residential areas, with more all the time due to the many apartment buildings and condos going up. It would be unfortunate if we added a lot more drivers, sonic of them a lot more drunk, to our already - crowded roads. Would it help iftaprooms were situated on high - frequency bus routes? Or were limited in size? Even though I support loosening of restrictions, I think the unintended consequences of changing the Hiles should be filly considered. 0 Supports comment... _ _. / Reply to Chds Bremer l i Nbrc Porter at Jinuarv3O, 2015 at 12:59pm CST My only concern is police coverage near drinking establishments so they do catch people who should not drive. It appears that the police currently do a goodjob keepi ig our streets safe. 0 Supports colrmcn t ... Reply to Mary Porter Sign Up Coninec email address... Sign Up Participants w i +B :f J �i To: Mayor and City Council From: Joe Abood Braemar Golf Course General Manager Date: February 17, 2015 Subject: Braemar Master Plan Update Action Requested: Information / Background /ANA, o e , • l�CORPOR-`,tr�0 • 1888 Agenda Item #: V.C. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Richard Mandell will be presenting six concept plans that have been developed as part of the Braemar Master Plan process. This information is intended to provide the council a status update on the process. I At the June 17, 2014 City Council meeting the council ratified the selection of the Braemar Master Plan Task Force appointments. Rick Ites, Pacy Erck, Joseph Hulbert, Dick Brozic and Paul Presthus were selected by i an application and interview process as well as two additional members, Brenda McCormick and David ji 1 Deeds that were appointed by the Park Board. The task force has been meeting on a weekly basis since July 2014. Rick Ites was selected as the chairperson to lead the Master Plan Task Force through the process. On July 28, 2014 the Request for Proposal for the Braemar Golf Course Master Plan was advertised. On Aug. 22, 2014 twenty -eight (28) consultants from all over the country submitted proposals in response to the Braemar Master Plan RFP. Of the 28, five were selected by staff to be interviewed and evaluated by the Master Plan Task Force. Interviews were conducted Sept. 8 -10, 2014. At the Sept. 16, 2014 City Council meeting Richard Mandell Golf Architecture consulting services was selected to complete the Master Plan at Braemar Golf Course. In October 2014 Mandell conducted multiple site walks with community residents, environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force as well as held an open house to gather feedback for the Master Plan. In January 2015 Mandell met with community residents, environmental agencies and the Master Plan Task Force to discuss preliminary concepts for the future of the Braemar Golf facility. Staff will be seeking approval of the final plan from the Master Plan Task Force in March 2015, Park Board in April 2015, and final approval from City Council in May 2015. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Braemar Golf Course Concept Plans Executive Summary Page 2 Richard Mandell Golf Architecture (RMGA) completed four focus -group meetings and subsequent walk - throughs of Braemar Golf Course with City of Edina residents and golfers, city staff and Braemar Golf staff in October 2014 to learn more about the 27 holes of the golf course. An additional on -site meeting was undertaken at that time with members of Barr Engineering and Kevin Bigalke of the Nine -Mile Creek Watershed District to best understand the site conditions and how those conditions, as well as previous permits and current regulations, may affect future design work at Braemar Golf Course. Upon completion of those meetings, RMGA began a study of the 27 regulation holes at Braemar Golf Course to best determine the highest and best uses of the site as a golf course and how to proceed with possible renovations to the golf course (this study does NOT include the driving range or current executive nine -hole golf course at Braemar). RMGA refers to this as a Renovation Business Plan process. Per the City of Edina's request, the first step in the RBP process is to develop a number of site design concepts to examine potential design opportunities such as converting some of the course to an executive course, reducing the overall number of golf holes, or simply creating the best possible golf holes. RMGA has developed six different alternatives for the Braemar Golf Course site: Option I: Improvements to Castle and Hays Nines with New Regulation Clunie Nine that utilizes previously undisturbed Braemar parkland property. The first option considers essential changes to both the Castle and Hays Nines primarily for safety, playability, challenge, and interest as well as a re- design of the Clunie Nine in order to bring it up to the standard of enjoyment and playability currently found in the Castle and Hays Nines by golfers which will preserve a third regulation nine -hole loop for the City of Edina. Option 2: Improvements to Castle, Hays and Clunie Nines with minimal impact on previously undisturbed Braemar parkland property. This option considers essential changes to both the Castle and Hays Nines primarily for safety, playability, challenge, and interest as well as a re- design of the Clunie Nine in order to bring it up to the standard of enjoyment and playability currently found in the Castle and Hays nines by golfers which will preserve a third regulation nine -hole loop for the City of Edina. Option 3: Improvements to Castle and Hays with Restored 18th Hole and New Executive Clunie Nine. Option 3 considers essential changes to both the Castle and Hays Nines primarily for safety, playability, challenge, and interest while transforming the regulation Clunie Nine into a more manageable executive nine -hole layout. Option 4: New Eighteen Hole Regulation Golf Course. This option explores the possibility of a new stand- alone 18 hole golf course that utilizes previously undisturbed Braemar parkland property. Option 5: New Eighteen Hole Regulation Golf Course with minimal impact on previously undisturbed Braemar parkland property. This option explores the possibility of a new stand -alone 18 hole golf course on the property currently encompassing all three nine -hole loops. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Option 6: New Eighteen Hole Regulation Golf Course with minimal impact on previously undisturbed Braemar parkland property. This option explores the possibility of a new stand -alone 18 hole golf course and four -hole practice loop course on the property currently encompassing all three nine -hole loops. Richard Mandell Golf Architecture has provided the following schedule: Completed in October 2014 • Preparation of a Digital Base Sheet • Review of Relevant Course Documentation • Planning Activity Meetings /Public Engagement Events • Braemar Master Plan Task Force Punch List Walk - Throughs • RMGA Renovation Business Plan Punch List Walk - Throughs • Additional Planning Meetings • Environmental Evaluation Completed in January 2015 • Graphic Renovation Business Plan • Preliminary Concept Plans • Master Plan Task Force Review • Park Board Review • Public Open House Review February 2015 • Renovation Business Plan Report • Present to City Council on Feb. 17, 2015 • Construction Phasing Analysis and Cost Estimates March /April 2015 • Five Year Construction Sequencing Plan • Presentation to Appropriate Committees • Final Completion of Renovation Business Plan and Report June 2015 • Completion of the Tree Assessment Report Attachment: Renovation Business Plan and Re- Routing Concepts Page 3 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE A, 1, RENOVATION BUSINESS PLAN 04 e W p AND RE- ROUTING CONCEPTS `�ww' February 11, 2015 1fi9J RICHARD MANDELL GOLF ARCHITECTURE PO Box 1119 Pinehurst, North Carolina 28' )70 tel (910) 255 -3111 fax (910) 255 -3112 golf - architecture. com richard@golf-architecture.com ben@golf-arcl:iitecture.com BRAEMAR RENOVATION BUSINESS PLAN AND RE-ROUTING CONCEPTS Following are brief descriptions of the Renovation Business Plan option developed by Richard Mandell Golf Architecture as well as six additional re - routing concepts for the Braemar Golf Course site, all based on study of the site by RMGA and course walk - throughs with City of Edina citizens, golfers of all ages, abilities, and gender, and golf course staff. No matter what routing option the City of Edina chooses, any renovation work undertaken will be much more playable for golfers of all ages and abilities than the current golf holes at Braemar Golf Course. This will be accomplished by eliminating penal sand bunkers and replacing them with more strategic hazards that challenge the golfer rather than penalize the golfer, providing fairway landing areas of forty yards or more in many cases, and through Richard Mandell's Tee Shot Distance Equity Philosophy as described in the following paragraph. By placing tee boxes in more appropriate locations based on how far golfers hit their golf ball, golfers can play the same club to each green regardless of the tee box their partners may be playing. BUT, this can only be accomplished provided each golfer plays the tee box which best fits their own talents and abilities. There will be anywhere from four to six'tee boxes for each hole. Each of the concepts works around the existing wetland areas and within a sixty - foot buffer surrounding each wetland area, which represents a worst -case scenario as the golf course relates to possible buffer areas. As part of the efforts, we propose to remove all invasive species along wetland edges and within wetland buffers and plant appropriate native species instead. Where it makes sense and does not impact the playability of the golf course, we intend to increase buffers. In addition, each concept includes as many Oak Savanna Restoration Areas as possible. Traditional turfgrass will be removed from these areas and replaced with the appropriate prairie grasses and Bur Oak trees (and others) planted to cover 50% of the proposed Oak Savanna Restoration Areas. Any additional tree planting in these areas deviates from the proper ratio of open space to tree canopy within an Oak Savanna landscape. Each of the seven concepts provide for walking trails throughout the site as well. The Renovation Business Plan and all six options include new golf course features (tees, sand bunkers, and greens) as well as a completely new irrigation system and re - grassing of the entire site. Any cost variation comes in the amount of the limits of work, clearing, earthwork, topsoil removal and replacement and the number of and length of golf holes. The longer the golf course (and the more holes), the more work (and cost) required. That said, the overall cost of each concept does not vary greatly because the site is so widespread with golf to begin with and any renovation efforts will require disturbance of the majority of the site regardless of the number of final holes. BRAEMAR PARK OAK SAVANNA CANOPY HISTORY: In 1947, the 445 - acre parcel of Braemar Park included 1,843 individual trees in an Oak Savanna setting with an average spread of 40'. The total tree canopy for these trees is 53.15 acres. In addition, there are 7.5 acres of woodland along the northern border of the site. Based upon these numbers, the total acreage of the site that is wooded is 60.65, or 13.6% of the site. In 2015, the 445 - acre parcel of Braemar Park has 170.27 acres of tree canopy, or 38.26% of the site. None of this acreage can truly be classified as Oak Savanna due to the increased presence of invasive species and additional Oak growth. RENOVATION BUSINESS PLAN: MINIMAL IMPROVEMENTS TO CASTLE, HAYS, AND CLUNIE NINE The proposed Renovation Business Plan is the option of least change to the golf course yet still addresses as many of the fundamental problems within the layout as possible without radical alteration. This option generally preserves the golf holes within the existing golf hole corridors. If the City intends to undertake any work of significance on the golf course, at the very least, a complete greens and sand bunker renovation project should be considered along with select clearing of trees based on the Tree Management Plan currently in progress by RMGA. Within this option, the greens would remain in their current locations without any re - routing or moving of greens complexes. This is the only alternative where installing a new complete irrigation system would not be absolutely necessary. Additional options that are logical steps up from just the greens, sand bunkers, and select clearing would include the following (the following alternatives implemented without an irrigation system would not be a smart use of the City's funds): • Greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, and a new irrigation system. • Greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, new irrigation system, wall to wall cart paths, and all proposed Oak Savanna Restoration Areas. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 5, 526 yards - Hole #1 is extended to a par five to allow for an easier and speedier start to the round. Hole #2 - par 4, 407 yards - Hole #2 is shortened to a par four to make it easier for golfers to carry the narrow neck of fairway where the water feature is piped with their golf shots as well as also creating a more manageable start to the round. Hole #3 - par 3, 204 yards - Hole #3's tees move to the right of the existing tees to provide more buffer from the second green. The hole will play to the existing third green. Hole #4 - par 5, 506 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole but will be moved to the front nine to improve congestion with adjacent golf holes and help create more balance between the Castle and Hays nines in terms of overall yardage. This hole also contributes to a more manageable start to the round. This hole has an alternative upper fairway from the second landing area to the green for variety. Hole #5 - par 4, 416 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole and like the previous hole, congestion will be reduced by moving this hole to the Castle nine. The congestion improvement will be experienced at the green going to the existing sixth hole. It also helps to balance out yardages between the Castle and Hays nines. Hole #6 - par 4, 438.yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing sixth hole. Hole #7 - par 3,187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing seventh hole. Hole #8 - par 4, 412 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighth hole. Hole #9 - par 4, 374 yards - This hole becomes an heroic par four asking the golfer to cut the corner of the water to gain an advantage. By converting the hole to a par four and moving the tees closer to the water features, many golfers can manage their shots with less forced carry on both the tee and the approach. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 5, 507 yards - The tenth hole will become a par five in order to increase overall par of the Hays nine to a 36 and allow for improving pace of play for that nine. Hole #11- par 4, 374 yards - This hole remains in place other than extending the green slightly up into the hillside to improve visibility and drainage. The tees will be moved to the right to provide more safety buffer from the tenth green. Hole #12 - par 3,155 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole except for adding additional tees farther up the hill. Hole #13 - par 4, 373 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing thirteenth hole. Hole #14 - par 4, 402 yards - The fourteenth hole is the existing fourth hole but will be moved to the Hays nine to help balance the overall yardage of both the Castle and Hays nines and improve overall congestion at the fifth /sixth and fifteenth/ sixteenth holes. The green is moved to the right so that the hole plays with the lay of the land instead of against it (where the existing green sits) and also allows for the existing swale to become a strategic hazard on the golfer's approach. Hole #15 - par 4, 367 yards - The fifteenth hole is generally in the existing fifth hole's corridor. The tees will play farther back than the existing fifth tees and more along the line of the existing fourth green (to the right). The hole will dogleg to the right with the green placed in the hillside farther away from the existing fifteenth green. This will double the safety buffer between each green location from the existing locations. Also, it improves circulation so golfers can walk from the new green location to the new sixteenth tee without crossing behind another hole. Hole #16 - par 5, 523 yards - The tees for sixteen will be extended farther back and up the hill. The fairway will shift farther right than its current location (and will be improved for drainage), and the green will move slightly back and to the left. Moving the fairway to the right will increase safety buffer from the sixth fairway. In addition to increasing overall par on the Hays nine, making the hole a par five allows for staggered landing areas with the adjacent sixth hole, thereby minimizing conflicting stray shots. Moving the green to the left also allows for the restoration of the original seventeenth tee. Hole #17 - par 3,193 yards - The seventeenth hole moves slightly to the right of its existing location. Hole #18 - par 4, 321 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighteenth hole but can be transformed into a much better strategic challenge through smart design. Clunie Nine Hole #19 - par 4, 390 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing nineteenth hole. Hole #20 - par 3, 185 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twentieth hole. Hole #21- par 4, 360 yards - The 21 st hole will play to a new green location downhill and to the left of the existing green, eliminating the severe dogleg of the existing hole as well as a blind green. Hole #22 - par 3, 209 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twenty - second hole. Hole #23 - par 4, 424 yards - The new 23rd hole will be a straight par - four along the corridor of the existing par - five #23. The green will be re - located to the top of the hill where the turning point of the second landing area is currently located. Hole #24 - par 3,139 yards - The new 24th hole will be a downhill par -three from the corner of the second landing area of the existing 23rd hole to the existing 23rd green location. The hole does not encroach on any wedand buffers. Hole #25 - par 4, 441 yards - The tees for the proposed par four will play from the front tees of the existing hole to a landing area short of the second creek crossing. The green will be slightly to the right of the existing 24th green. Converting this hole to a par four and moving the tees up makes the carries over both water features much more manageable for the majority of golfers. Hole #26 - par 4, 421 yards - This hole will play from the old island green location to the existing 26th green location. By moving the tees to the island, the golf hole can be straightened out, be less blind off the tees, and also bring the landing area back away from the creek crossing, allowing for a more ample landing area for the golfers. Hole #27 - par 5, 500 yards - The 27th hole will play from the existing ninth tees. These tee locations will help to minimize the forced carries for the majority of golfers by bringing the landing areas farther back away from the water crossings. The green will remain in its existing location. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,470 yards Hays Nine: par 36 - 3,214 yards Clunie Nine: par 34 - 3,069 yards Castle to Hays: par 72 - 6,685 yards Hays to Clunie: par 70 - 6,284 yards Clunie to Castle: par 70 - 6,540 yards Renovation Business Plan Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 3.92 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 16.20 acres (8.10 acres of actual Oak canopy) Green complexes, sand bunkers, and select clearing: $2,198,883.08 Greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, and a new irrigation system: $4,908,541.15 Greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, new irrigation system, wall to wall cart paths, and all proposed Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: $7,154,384.50 Total Project Preliminary Estimated Cost: $7,809,774.36 OPTION 1 - THE BEST 27 REGULATION HOLES POSSIBLE Option 1 is Richard Mandell Golf Architecture's effort to create the three best possible nine hole loops for Braemar Golf Course. Utilizing the entire property to the best of its ability, the sole objective is to create three equal nines to change the current sentiment of Braemar Golf Course as a solid and enjoyable original eighteen holes with a third nine unacceptable to the majority of golfers. From our efforts, it is apparent that if a substantial change to the third nine is not made, then any smaller effort to improve the Clunie nine will fall short of expectations. With that thought, the money spent on anything less will be money poorly - spent. Concept 1 is intended to clearly create three equal nines. Castle Nine Hole #1 - par 5, 526 yards - Hole #1 is extended to a par five to allow for an easier and speedier start to the round. Hole #2 - par 4, 407 yards - Hole #2 is shortened to a par four to make it easier for golfers to carry the narrow neck of fairway where the water feature is piped with their golf shots as well as also creating a more manageable start to the round. Hole #3 - par 3, 204 yards - Hole #3's tees move to the right of the existing tees to provide more buffer from the second green. The hole will play to the existing third green. Hole #4 - par 5, 521 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole but will be moved to the front nine to improve congestion with adjacent golf holes and help create more balance between the Castle and Hays nines in terms of overall yardage. This hole also contributes to a more manageable start to the round. This hole has an alternative upper fairway from the second landing area to the green for variety. Hole #5 - par 4, 416 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole and like the previous hole, congestion will be reduced by moving this hole to the Castle nine. The congestion improvement will be experienced at the green going to the existing sixth hole. It also helps to balance out yardages between the Castle and Hays nines. Hole #6 - par 4, 448 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing sixth hole. Hole #7 - par 3,187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing seventh hole. Hole #8 - par 4, 417 yards - The eighth hole will play to the original eighth green location that was utilized prior to the addition of the Clunie nine. This reflects many golfer's wishes for a return to that green site as well as allowing for more safety buffer from the ninth tees. Hole #9 - par 4, 383 yards - This hole becomes an heroic par four asking the golfer to cut the corner of the water to gain an advantage. By converting the hole to a par four and moving the tees closer to the water features, many golfers will be able to manage their shots with less forced carry on both the tee and the approach. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 5, 507 yards - The tenth hole will become a par five in order to increase the par of the Hays nine to a 36 and allow for improving pace of play for that nine. Hole #11- par 4, 374 yards - This hole remains in place other than extending the green slightly up into the hillside to improve visibility and drainage. The tees will be moved to the right to provide more safety buffer from the tenth green. Hole #12 - par 3,155 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole except for adding additional tees farther up the hill. Hole #13 - par 4, 373 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing thirteenth hole. Hole #14 - par 4, 435 yards - The fourteenth hole is the existing fourth hole but will be moved to the Hays nine to help balance the overall yardage of both the Castle and Hays nines and improve overall congestion at the fifth /sixth and fifteenth/ sixteenth holes. The green is moved to the right so that the hole plays with the lay of the land instead of against it (where the existing green sits) and also allows for the existing swale to become a strategic hazard on the golfer's approach. Hole #15 - par 4, 425 yards - The fifteenth hole is generally in the existing fifth hole's corridor. The tees will play farther back than the existing fifth tees and more along the line of the existing fourth green (to the right). The hole will dogleg to the right with the green placed in the hillside farther away from the existing fifteenth green. This will double the safety buffer between each green location from the existing locations. Also, it improves circulation so golfers can walk directly from the new green location to the new sixteenth tee without crossing behind another hole. Hole #16 - par 5, 548 yards - The tees for sixteen will be extended farther back and up the hill. The fairway will shift farther right than its current location (and will be improved for drainage), and the green will move slightly back and to the left. Moving the fairway to the right will increase safety buffer from the sixth fairway. In addition to increasing overall par on the Hays nine, making the hole a par five allows for staggered landing areas with the adjacent sixth hole, thereby minimizing conflicting stray shots. Moving the green to the left also allows for the restoration of the original seventeenth tee. Hole #17 - par 3, 193 yards - The seventeenth hole moves slightly to the right of its existing location. Hole #18 - par 4, 321 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighteenth hole but can be transformed into a much better strategic challenge through smart design. Clunie Nine Hole #19 - par 4, 389 yards - The nineteenth hole will have a tee extended backward and uphill. The hole will play straightaway to a green located where the existing #20 tees are located. This allows for more safety buffer from the proposed eighth green location. Hole #20 - par 3, 169 yards - The new tees will play from the left of the existing 22nd green yet the green location remains unchanged from the existing #20 green location. This allows us to also extend the playing distance of the hole since the existing 22nd hole will be moved as well. Hole #21- par 4, 368 yards - The 21 st hole will play to a new green location downhill and to the left of the existing green, eliminating the severe dogleg of the existing hole as well as a blind green. Hole #22 - par 3, 199 yards - A new par three will play from the existing 21st green to a location across an existing ravine to a natural plateau green location. Hole #23 - par 5, 549 yards - The new 23rd hole will be a straight par - five along the top of the ridge to the left of the existing 23rd hole. This will provide more safety buffer from the eighth green and ninth tees as well as eliminate the blindness of the existing hole. This hole will incorporate natural plateaus for the first landing area, second landing area, and green location, allowing for the natural drainage patterns of the land to be preserved and will require minimal earthwork to create sufficient playing corridors and a great natural hole. Hole #24 - par 3, 145 yards - The new 24th hole will be a downhill par -three from the corner of the second landing area of the existing 23rd hole to the existing 23rd green location. The hole does not encroach on any wetland buffers. Hole #25 - par 5, 523 yards - The tees for the proposed par five will play from the front tees of the existing hole to a landing area short of the second creek crossing. The green will be slightly to the right of the existing 24th green. Converting this hole to a par four and moving the tees up makes the carries over both water features much more manageable for the majority of golfers. Hole #26 - par 4, 417 yards - This hole will play from the old island green location to the existing 26th green location. By moving the tees to the island, the golf hole can be straightened out, be less blind off the tees, and also bring the landing area back away from the creek crossing, allowing for a more ample landing area for the golfers. Hole #27 - par 5, 503 yards - The 27th hole will play from the existing ninth tees. These tee locations will help to minimize the forced carries for the majority of golfers by bringing the landing areas farther back away from the water crossings. The green will remain in its existing location. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,510 yards Hays Nine: par 36 - 3,331 yards Clunie Nine: par 36 - 3,261 yards Castle to Hays: par 72 - 6,841 yards Hays to Clunie: par 72 - 6,592 yards Clunie to Castle: par 72 - 6,771 yards Option 1 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 14.18 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 20.63 acres (10.32 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $8,348,382.94 OPTION 2 - THE BEST 27 REGULATION HOLES POSSIBLE WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE The difference between our best effort of Option 1 and Option 2 is that number two does not have any holes within the existing woodlands on either the east nor west sides. Instead, Option 2 is the best possible twenty - seven hole routing within the existing golf course land. As a result, this option is shorter than Option 1 but still far superior to the three current nines. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 5, 526 yards - Hole #1 is extended to a par five to allow for an easier and speedier start to the round. Hole #2 - par 4, 407 yards - Hole #2 is shortened to a par four to make it easier for golfers to carry the narrow neck of fairway where the water feature is piped with their golf shots as well as also creating a more manageable start to the round. Hole #3 - par 3, 204 yards - Hole #3's tees move to the right of the existing tees to provide more buffer from the second green. The hole will play to the existing third green. Hole #4 - par 5, 521 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole but will be moved to the front nine to improve congestion with adjacent golf holes and help create more balance between the Castle and Hays nines in terms of overall yardage. This hole also contributes to a more manageable start to the round. This hole does not have an alternative upper fairway from the second landing area to the green for variety. Hole #5 - par 4, 416 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole and like the previous hole, congestion will be reduced by moving this hole to the Castle nine. The congestion improvement will be experienced at the green going to the existing sixth hole. It also helps to balance out yardages between the Castle and Hays nines. Hole #6 - par 4, 438 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing sixth hole. Hole #7 - par 3, 187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing seventh hole. Hole #8 - par 4, 412 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighth hole. Hole #9 - par 4, 374 yards - This hole becomes an heroic par four asking the golfer to cut the corner of the water to gain an advantage. By converting the hole to a par four and moving the tees closer to the water features, many golfers will be able to manage their shots with less forced carry on both the tee and the approach. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 5, 507 yards - The tenth hole will become a par five in order to increase the par of the Hays nine to a 36 and allow for improving pace of play for that nine. Hole #11- par 4, 374 yards - This hole remains in place other than extending the green slightly up into the hillside to improve visibility and drainage. The tees will be moved to the right to provide more safety buffer from the tenth green. Hole #12 - par 3,155 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole except for adding additional tees farther up the hill. Hole #13 - par 4, 373 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing thirteenth hole. Hole #14 - par 4, 419 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing fourth hole. Hole #15 - par 3, 217 yards - The fifteenth hole is generally in the existing fifth hole's corridor but reduced to a par - three to eliminate the dangerous buffer situation the current fifth hole creates with the existing fifteenth hole and remain out of the woodland to the west. Hole #16 - par 5, 523 yards - The tees for sixteen will be extended farther back and up the hill. The fairway will shift farther right than its current location (and will be improved for drainage), and the green will move slightly back and to the left. Moving the fairway to the right will increase safety buffer from the sixth fairway. In addition to increasing overall par on the Hays nine, making the hole a par five allows for staggered landing areas with the adjacent sixth hole, thereby minimizing conflicting stray shots. Moving the green to the left also allows for the restoration of the original seventeenth tee. Hole #17 - par 3, 196 yards - The seventeenth hole moves slightly to the right of its existing location. Hole #18 - par 4, 321 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighteenth hole but can be transformed into a much better strategic challenge through smart design. Clunie Nine Hole #19 - par 4, 390 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing nineteenth hole. Hole #20 - par 3,186 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twentieth hole. Hole #21- par 4, 360 yards - The 21st hole will play to a new green location downhill and to the left of the existing green, eliminating the severe dogleg of the existing hole as well as a blind green. Hole #22 - par 3, 209 yards '- This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twenty - second hole. Hole #23 - par 4, 424 yards - The new 23rd hole will be a straight par - four along the corridor of the existing par - five #23. The green will bete - located to the top of the hill where the turning point of the second landing area is currently located. Hole #24 - par 3,129 yards - The new 24th hole will be a downhill par -three from the corner of the second landing area of the existing 23rd hole to the existing 23rd green location. The hole does not encroach on any wetland buffers. Hole #25 - par 5, 523 yards - The tees for the proposed par five will play from the front tees of the existing hole to a landing area short of the second creek crossing. The green will be slightly to the right of the existing 24th green. Converting this hole to a par four and moving the tees up makes the carries over both water features much more manageable for the majority of golfers. Hole #26 - par 4, 421 yards - This hole will play from the old island green location to the existing 26th green location. By moving the tees to the island, the golf hole can be straightened out, be less blind off the tees, and also bring the landing area back away from the creek crossing, allowing for a more ample landing area for the golfers. Hole #27 - par 5, 503 yards - The 27th hole will play from the existing ninth tees. These tee locations will help to minimize the forced carries for the majority of golfers by bringing the landing areas farther back away from the water crossings. The green will remain in its existing location. Castle Nine: Hays Nine: Clunie Nine: Castle to Hays: Hays to Clunie: Clunie to Castle: par 36 - 3,486 yards par 36 - 3,086 yards par 35 - 3,144 yards par 71 - 6,571 yards par 70 - 6,230 yards par 71 - 6,630 yards Option 2 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 1.44 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 17.66 acres (8.83 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $8,025,198.63 OPTION 3 - THE BEST 18 REGULATION HOLES & EXECUTIVE S POSSIBLE WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE Option 3 contains the best 18 holes from Option 2, also avoiding the woodlands on both the east and west sides. The third nine in this option has been reduced to an executive nine playing to a par of 32. The shortened nine avoids most of the southwest corner of the golf property which is the most difficult area on the golf course to provide acceptable turfgrass conditions. This can be converted to an Environmental Education Area. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 5, 526 yards - Hole #1 is extended to a par five to allow for an easier and speedier start to the round. This concept shows the green for the hole tucked into the base of the hillside to the right of the existing hole as an alternative. Hole #2 - par 4, 407 yards - Hole #2 is shortened to a par four to make it easier for golfers to carry the narrow neck of fairway where the water feature is piped with their golf shots as well as also creating a more manageable start to the round. Hole #3 - par 3, 204 yards - Hole #31s tees move to the right of the existing tees to provide more buffer from the second green. The hole will play to the existing third green. Hole #4 - par 5, 521 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole but will be moved to the front nine to improve congestion with adjacent golf holes and help create more balance between the Castle and Hays nines in terms of overall yardage. This hole also contributes to a more manageable start to the round. Hole #5 - par 4, 416 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole and like the previous hole, congestion will be reduced by moving this hole to the Castle nine. The congestion improvement will be experienced at the green going to the existing sixth hole. It also helps to balance out yardages between the Castle and Hays nines. Hole #6 - par 4, 438 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing sixth hole but with the tees extended back farther than in Concepts 1 and 2. Hole #7 - par 3,187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing seventh hole. Hole #8 - par 4, 412 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighth hole. Hole #9 - par 4, 374 yards - This hole becomes an heroic par four asking the golfer to cut the corner of the water to gain an advantage. By converting the hole to a par four and moving the tees closer to the water features, many golfers will be able to manage their shots with less forced carry on both the tee and the approach. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 5, 507 yards - The tenth hole will become a par five in order to increase the par of the Hays nine to a 36 and allow for improving pace of play for that nine. Hole #11- par 4, 374 yards - This hole remains in place other than extending the green slightly up into the hillside to improve visibility and drainage. The tees will be moved to the right to provide more safety buffer from the tenth green. Hole #12 - par 3,155 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole. Hole #13 - par 4, 373 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing thirteenth hole. Hole #14 - par 4, 419 yards - The fourteenth hole is the existing fourth hole but will be moved to the Hays nine to help balance the overall yardage of both the Castle and Hays nines and improve overall congestion at the fifth /sixth and fifteenth / sixteenth holes. Hole #15 - par 3, 217 yards - The fifteenth hole is generally in the existing fifth hole's corridor but reduced to a par - three to eliminate the dangerous buffet situation the current fifth hole creates with the existing fifteenth hole and remain out of the woodland to the west. Hole #16 - par 5, 523 yards - The tees for sixteen will be extended farther back and up the hill. The fairway will shift farther right than its current location (and will be improved for drainage), and the green will move slightly back and to the left. Moving the fairway to the right will increase safety buffer from the sixth fairway. In addition to increasing overall par on the Hays nine, making the hole a par five allows for staggered landing areas with the adjacent sixth hole, thereby minimizing conflicting stray shots. Moving the green to the left also allows for the restoration of the original seventeenth tee. Hole #17 - par 3,196 yards - The seventeenth hole moves slightly to the right of its existing location and farther back. Hole #18 - par 4, 321 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing eighteenth hole but can be transformed into a much better strategic challenge through smart design. Clunie Nine Hole #19 - par 4, 390 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing nineteenth hole. Hole #20 - par 3,186 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing #20 hole. Hole #21- par 4, 360 yards - The 21st hole will play to a new green location downhill and to the left of the existing green, eliminating the severe dogleg of the existing hole as well as a blind green. Hole #22 - par 3, 209 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing #22 hole. Hole #23 - par 4, 424 yards - The new 23rd hole will be a straight par - four along the corridor of the existing par - five #23. The green will be re - located to the top of the hill where the turning point of the second landing area is currently located. Hole #24 - par 3,129 yards - The new 24th hole will be a downhill par -three from the corner of the second landing area of the existing 23rd hole to the existing 23rd green location. The hole does not encroach on any wetland buffers. Hole #25 - par 3, 196 yards - The new 25th hole will be a downhill par -three playing from the front tees of the existing 24th hole to between just beyond the first creek crossing and short of the existing hole's first landing area. The hole does not encroach on any wetland buffers. Hole #26 - par 3, 152 yards - This hole will play uphill from the end of the existing landing area of the current 26th hole to the hole's existing green as well. Hole #27 - par 5, 503 yards - The 27th hole will play from the existing ninth tees. These tee locations will help to minimize the forced carries for the majority of golfers by bringing the landing areas farther back away from the water crossings. The green will remain in its existing location. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,486 yards Hays Nine: par 35 - 3,086 yards Clunie Nine: par 32 - 2,549 yards Castle to Hays: par 71 - 6,571 yards Hays to Clunie: par 67 - 5,635 yards Clunie to Castle: par 68 - 6,035 yards Option 3 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 1.44 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 23.42 acres (11.71 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $8,099,328,02 OPTION 4 - NEW EIGHTEEN HOLE REGULATION GOLF COURSE This option is Richard Mandell Golf Architecture's effort to create the best possible eighteen hole golf course that the current Braemar Golf Course property will yield. The reduction in holes allows for the southwest corner of the golf course to be converted to a 7.50 acre Environmental Education Area. It also provides for a Multi - Use Area close to the parking lots and clubhouse that can be used for Disc Golf, Fling Golf, Foot Golf, Walking Trails, Picnic Areas, Field Games, Water Activities, and Sledding or Tubing. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 4, 411 yards - Hole #1 is essentially the existing tenth hole. Hole #2 - par 4, 403 yards - Hole #2 plays from the right of the existing eleventh tees to the eleventh fairway but then doglegs to the right over the creek to a new green site at the base of the existing thirteenth fairway. The intention for this hole is to clean out the creek that plays along the right side of the fairway and allow it to be a strategic hazard challenging golfers to bite off as much of the creek as possible off the tee (for the longer hitters) or play as close to it as possible for the shortest possible approach. Hole #3 - par 3,177 yards - The third hole is a par -three playing from the landing area of the existing thirteenth hole (between the trees that pinch the fairway) to the existing thirteenth green, which will be perched up in front of the pond. Hole #4 - par 5, 505 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole. Hole #5 - par 3, 236 yards - The proposed fifth hole is a downhill par -three playing from the existing fifth tees to the fairway landing area of the existing fifth hole. This hole can be a "Cathedral" hole, utilizing the hillside as a backdrop. Hole #6 - par 5, 540 yards - This hole will be a downhill dogleg left playing within the existing fourth hole in reverse. The fairway will play around the large hillside that currently separates the existing fourth and fourteenth holes. The green will be at the base of the existing fourth tees. Hole #7 - par 3,162 yards - The seventh hole is located where the third hole is but in reverse. The green will be just to the right of the existing third tees. Hole #8 - par 5, 508 yards - The eighth hole will be a par -five playing from the existing second green along the second fairway to a green set in front of the pond that currently separates the existing back tees for the second hole and the fairway. This hole fits perfectly in its setting and will be much more manageable for most golfers as the piped creek crossing is much easier to carry off the tees for most talent levels than crossing it in its current configuration. Hole #9 - par 4, 388 yards - The proposed ninth hole will play from the hillside to the right of the existing first green back down the existing first fairway to a green site just in front of the existing first tee. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 4, 437 yards - The tenth hole will be where the existing nineteenth hole sits but with a tee extended backward and uphill. The hole will dogleg to the left to a green located where the existing #22 green is located. Hole #11- par 5, 625 yards - The new eleventh hole will be a double - fairway par - five with the longer option playing along the top of the ridge to the left of the existing 23rd hole, incorporating natural plateaus for the first and second landing areas along this fairway. The alternate lower fairway will be a shorter, more heroic direction with the alternate second landing area playing through the valley of the existing 23rd fairway. The green will be perched on the hillside at the intersection of the tee complexes for the existing ninth, twenty- fourth, and twenty- seventh holes. This routing will allow natural drainage patterns of the land to be preserved and will require minimal earthwork to create sufficient playing corridors and a great natural hole. Hole #12 - par 4, 447 yards - The proposed twelfth hole will be a par -four playing from just in front of the water to the area between the existing eighteenth and twenty- seventh fairways. The green will be located where the existing seventh fairway starts. This hole will require a much more manageable carry off the tees for all talent levels than the existing holes in this area. Hole #13 - par 3,187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole except for adding tees farther up the hill and to the left. Hole #14 - par 4, 435 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole. Hole #15 - par 4, 425 yards - The fifteenth hole will be a par -four playing from tees up in the hillside behind the existing sixteenth tees to a faairway and green that is located between the existing sixth and sixteenth greens. Hole #16 - par 5, 566 yards - This hole will be a heroic par -five with the back tees located where the existing sixth green sits and additional forward tees located near the existing. sixteenth green and where existing tees for hole seventeen are located. The fairway will encompass both the existing seventeenth and twenty -sixth holes as well as a portion of the existing twenty- fourth fairway. The green will be the existing twenty -sixth green location. This hole will challenge all golfers to bite off as much of the water as possible on their second shots if they choose to go for the green in two or play down the safer yet longer right side. Hole #17 - par 3, 169 yards - The seventeenth hole will start just left of the middle tees of the existing ninth hole and play downhill to the existing eighth "green. Hole #18 - par 4,426 yards - The final hole for the proposed new eighteen hole routing will be a heroic par -four playing from the edge of the existing eighth fairway, crossing over the water at a diagonal to the existing ninth fairway. The tees will be located so that the more aggressive golfer can take the shorter route to gain an advantage, but will have to face a longer carry over the water in order to gain the reward. The green will be located at the existing seventh green. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,329 yards Hays Nine: par 36 - 3,719 yards Total: par 72 - 7,048 yards Option 4 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 11.21 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 40.15 acres (20.08 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $6,241,027,02 OPTION 5 - NEW EIGHTEEN HOLE REGULATION GOLF COURSE WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE The difference between Options 4 and 5 is that Option 5 does not have any holes within the existing woodlands on either the east nor west sides. Option 5 is the best possible eighteen hole routing within the existing golf course land. As a result, this option is shorter than Option 4 but still far superior to the three current nines. As in Option 4, the reduction in holes allows for the southwest corner of the golf course to be converted to a 7.50 acre Environmental Education Area. It provides for a Multi - Use Area near the parking lots and clubhouse to be used for Disc Golf, Fling Golf, Foot Golf, Walking Trails, Picnic Areas, Field Games, Water Activities, and Sledding or Tubing. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 4, 371 yards - Hole #1 is essentially the existing tenth hole. Hole #2 - par 4, 403 yards - Hole #2 plays from the right of the existing eleventh tees to the eleventh fairway but then doglegs to the right over the creek to a new green site at the base of the existing thirteenth fairway. The intention for this hole is to clean out the creek that plays along the right side of the fairway and allow it to be a strategic hazard challenging golfers to bite off as much of the creek as possible off the tee (for the longer hitters) or play as close to it as possible for the shortest possible approach. Hole #3 - par 3,177 yards - The third hole is a par -three playing from the landing area of the existing thirteenth hole (between the trees that pinch the fairway) to the existing thirteenth green, which will be perched up in front of the pond. Hole #4 - par 5, 507 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole. Hole #5 - par 3, 208 yards - The proposed fifth hole is a downhill par -three playing from the existing fifth tees to the fairway landing area of the existing fifth hole. This hole can be a "Cathedral" hole, utilizing the hillside as a backdrop. Hole #6 - par 5, 501 yards - This hole will be a shortened downhill dogleg left playing along the existing fourth hole in reverse. The fairway will play around the large hillside that currently separates the existing fourth and fourteenth holes. The green will be at the base of the existing fourth tees. Hole #7 - par 3,172 yards - The seventh hole is located where the third hole is but in reverse. The green will be just to the right of the existing third tees. Hole #8 - par 5, 520 yards - The eighth hole will be a par -five playing from the existing second green along the second fairway to a green set in front of the pond that currently separates the existing back tees for the second hole and the fairway. This hole fits perfectly in its setting and will be much more manageable for most golfers as the piped creek crossing is much easier to carry off the tees for most talent levels than crossing it in its current configuration. Hole #9 - par 4, 381 yards - The proposed ninth hole will play from the hillside to the right of the existing first green back down the existing first fairway to a green site just in front of the existing first tee. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 4, 374 yards - The tenth hole will be where the existing nineteenth hole is located. The new hole will have a tee extended backward and uphill. The hole will dogleg to the left to a green located in the hillside right of existing hole twenty. Hole #11- par 5, 586 yards - The new eleventh hole will be a double - fairway par - five with the shorter, heroic route playing along the top of the ridge to the right of the existing 23rd hole, incorporating natural plateaus for the first and second landing areas along this fairway. The alternate lower fairway will be a longer, safer direction with the alternate second landing area playing through the valley of the existing 23rd fairway. The green will be perched on the hillside at the intersection of the tee complexes for the existing ninth, twenty- fourth, and twenty- seventh holes. This routing will allow natural drainage patterns of the land to be preserved and will require minimal earthwork to create sufficient playing corridors and a great natural hole. Hole #12 - par 4, 448 yards - The proposed twelfth hole will be a par -four playing from just in front of the water to the area between the existing eighteenth and twenty- seventh fairways. The green will be located where the existing seventh fairway starts. This hole will require a much more manageable carry off the tees for all talent levels than the existing holes in this area. Hole #13 - par 3,187 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing twelfth hole except for adding tees farther up the hill and to the left. Hole #14 - par 4, 435 yards - This hole is the existing fifteenth hole. Hole #15 - par 4, 402 yards - The fifteenth hole will be a par -four playing from tees up in the hillside behind the existing sixteenth tees to a fairway and green that is located between the existing sixth and sixteenth greens. Hole #16 - par 5, 566 yards - This hole will be a heroic par -five with the back tees located where the existing sixth green sits and additional forward tees located near the existing sixteenth green and where existing tees for hole seventeen are located. The fairway will encompass both the existing seventeenth and twenty -sixth holes as well as a portion of the existing twenty- fourth fairway. The green will be the existing twenty -sixth green location. , This hole will challenge all golfers to bite off as much of the water as possible on their second shots if they choose to go for the green in two or play down the safer yet longer right side. Hole #17 - par 3, 178 yards - The seventeenth hole will start just left of the middle tees of the existing ninth hole and play downhill to the existing eighth green. Hole #18 - par 4, 379 yards - The final hole for the proposed new eighteen hole routing will be a heroic par -four playing from the edge of the existing eighth fairway, crossing over the water at a diagonal to the existing ninth fairway. The tees will be located so that the more aggressive golfer can take the shorter route to gain an advantage, but will have to face a longer carry over the water in order to gain the reward. The green will be located at the existing seventh green. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,239 yards Hays Nine: par 36 - 3,556 yards Total: par 72 - 6,795 yards Option 5 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 2.02 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 32.75 acres (16.38 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $6,358,178.14 OPTION 6 - NEW EIGHTEEN HOLE REGULATION GOLF COURSE AND FOUR - HOLE PRACTICE LOOP WITH MINIMAL DISTURBANCE Option 6 is a shortened eighteen - hole layout to make room for a four - hole practice loop. The practice loop is conveniently located at the northeast corner of the golf course so it is accessible from the parking lot at multiple points yet it also starts and finishes within walking distance of the clubhouse. All twenty - two holes remain within the existing golf course layout without interfering with the woodland areas to the east and west sides of the property. Castle Nine Hole #1- par 4, 372 yards - Hole 41 is essentially the existing tenth hole. Hole #2 - par 4, 383 yards - This hole remains in place other than extending the green slightly up into the hillside to improve visibility and drainage. The tees will be moved to the right to provide more safety buffer from the tenth green. Hole #3 - par 3, 186 yards - This hole is the existing twelfth hole. Hole #4 - par 4, 361 yards - The fourth hole is the existing thirteenth hole. Hole #5 - par 5, 505 yards - The fourth hole is the existing fourteenth hole. Hole #6 - par 4, 413 yards - This hole will be a downhill dogleg right playing along the existing fourth hole in reverse with the tees playing from the existing fifth tees. The fairway will be to the left of the large hillside that currently separates the existing fourth and fourteenth holes. The green shall sit at the base of the existing fourth tees. Hole #7 - par 3,172 yards - The seventh hole is located where the third hole is but in reverse. The green will be just to the right of the existing third tees. Hole #8 - par 5, 508 yards - The eighth hole will be a par -five playing from the existing second green along the second fairway to a green set in front of the pond that currently separates the existing back tees for the second hole and the fairway. This hole fits perfectly in its setting and will be much more manageable for most golfers as the piped creek crossing is much easier to carry off the tees for most talent levels than crossing it in its current configuration. Hole #9 - par 4, 388 yards - The proposed ninth hole will play from the hillside to the right of the existing first green back down the existing first fairway to a green site just in front of the existing first tee. Hays Nine Hole #10 - par 4, 428 yards - The tenth hole will begin up the hillside from the existing seventh green to the existing fifteenth fairway. The green will be placed in the hollow just past the pond that separates the existing fifteenth and sixth fairways. Hole #11- par 3,193 yards - The new eleventh hole will be a par - three starting at the upper portion of the existing fifteenth fairway playing uphill to the existing fourth green complex. Hole #12 - par 4, 368 yards - The proposed twelfth hole will be a par -four playing from the hillside right of the existing fourth fairway downhill to the existing fifth fairway. Tlie existing fifteenth green complex will be the new twelfth green. Hole #13 - par 4, 412 yards - This hole location remains unchanged from the existing sixteenth hole except for adding tees farther up the hill and to the left and a green located in front and slightly left of the current sixteenth green. Hole #14 - par 3,120 yards - This short par - three plays from the old back seventeenth tee to the existing sixth green. Hole #15 - par 5, 559 yards - This hole will be a heroic par -five with the back tees located where the existing eighteenth green sits and additional forward tees located where existing tees for hole seventeen are located. The fairway will encompass both the existing seventeenth and twenty -sixth holes as well as a portion of the existing twenty- fourth fairway. The green will be the existing twenty -sixth green location. This hole will challenge all golfers to bite off as much of the water as possible on their second shots if they choose to go for the green in two or play down the safer yet longer right side. Hole #16 - par 3, 240 yards - The sixteenth hole will play downhill from the existing ninth tees to a green located in the first landing area of the existing twenty - seventh hole. Hole #17 - par 4, 389 yards - The seventeenth hole will start just right of the twenty - seventh fairway northwest of the lake and play back to the southeast across the existing ninth fairway to a green situated in the first landing area of hole twenty - three. Hole #18 - par 5, 527 yards - The final hole for the proposed new eighteen hole routing will be a heroic par -five playing from just into the hillside east of hole number twenty - three tees to the first landing area in the existing eighth fairway. The second shot will challenge the golfer to cut the corner over the water to the existing ninth fairway. The green will be located just beyond the existing ninth green. Castle Nine: par 36 - 3,287 yards Hays Nine: par 35 - 3,237 yards Total: par 72 - 6,524 yards Practice Hole #P1- par 4, 398 yards - Practice hole P1 is the existing hole twenty - one playing straightaway to a green downhill and to the left of the existing green. Practice Hole #P2 - par 3, 86 yards - This short par - three will play directly uphill to the existing twenty - first green. Practice Hole #P3 - par 3, 183 yards - This hole is the existing hole number twenty - two. Practice Hole #P1 - par 4, 409 yards - The final practice hole will play from the front tees of the existing hole twenty - three down the nineteenth fairway in reverse to a new green just below the clubhouse. Option 6 Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: Proposed Tree Removal: 2.37 acres Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: 30.87 acres (15.44 acres of actual Oak canopy) Preliminary Estimated Cost: $ 6,749,371.90 COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY RBP green complexes, sand bunkers, and select clearing: $ 2,198,883.08 RBP greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, and a new irrigation system: $ 4,908,541.15 RBP greens, sand bunkers, select clearing, tee complexes, new irrigation system, wall to wall cart paths, and all proposed Oak Savanna Restoration Areas: $ 7,154,384.50 Complete Renovation Business Plan Option $ 7,809,774.36 Option 1: 27 Regulation Holes $ 8,348,382.94 Option 2: 27 Regulation Holes with Minimal Disturbance $ 8,025,198.63 Option 3: 18 Regulation Holes and 9 Executive Holes with Minimal Disturbance $ 8,099,328.02 Option 4: New 18 Hole Regulation Golf Course $ 6,241,027.02 Option 5: 18 Regulation Holes with Minimal Disturbance $ 6,358,178.14 Option 6:18 Regulation Holes and Four -Hole Practice Loop with Minimal Disturbance $ 6,749,371.90 01 \�t4l) i roR�B To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #: Vi. A. From: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — 2015 Community Development Block Grant, Resolution No. 2015 -20 Action Requested: Approve recommended 2015 CDBG budget for submission to Hennepin County. Information / Background: The CDBG Community Development Block Grant Program is a federal entitlement program administered by HUD who in turn, charges Hennepin County to oversee the distribution of funds to its communities. These funds are to be directed toward the improvement of housing opportunities and providing a suitable living environment for persons with low and moderate incomes. As a recipient of HUD funds, the County, and each community must affirmatively further fair housing. Hennepin County encourages all communities to be proactive by addressing impediments to fair housing choices. The use of CDBG funds to address local needs must be consistent with priorities identified in the Consolidated Plan for affordable housing, community development and human services. HUD mandates that no more than 15% of the city's budget may be directed toward funding public service agencies with the remaining 85% addressing community development needs. Edina's preliminary 2015 budget allotment for planning purposes is $126,866, the 2014 approved budget amount. Once HUD establishes the 2015 CDBG budget later this spring, Hennepin County and its respective cities will be notified of any changes to the allotments. If a change in the budget occurs, a paragraph in the accompanying Resolution provides for Edina's final 2015 CDBG budget to be readjusted without coming back to the City Council. The following agencies requesting 2015 CDBG funds are those which the City has supported for many years: Public Services — 15% of total ($126,866) budget = $19,030 • Senior Community Services (HOME — Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly) The mission of HOME is to assist adults 60 years of age and older to maintain their dignity and live independently by providing accessible, reliable, and affordable homemaker, home maintenance and chore services. In 2014, 47 seniors received services totaling 1,704 hours - reflecting a slight reduction in people served from 2013, but maintaining a high level of service hours. Historically, the total HOME operating budget for Edina has been $26,000, and since 2000 the City Council has asked the Edina Housing Foundation to make up the difference between the availability of CDBG funds to ensure that services to Edina seniors are met. SCS is requesting $10,095 (the 2014 distribution), however the recommended allotment is $8,955 in order to provide additional funding for HOME Line; with the understanding that the Edina Housing Foundation will work with SCS to meet their funding needs. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) CAPSH provides full -cycle homeownership services to include foreclosure prevention, first time homebuyer education, reverse mortgage counseling, home repair and maintenance, energy assistance, free legal services and tax preparation, employment counseling and financial /budget counseling. In 2014, CAPSH programs benefited 32 households: 15 took advantage of the Reverse mortgage counseling; 9 foreclosure prevention; 4 homebuyer education; and 6 Homebuyer prepurchase counseling. CAPSH is requesting $6,000 (an $835 increase from 2014). However, an allotment of is $5,165 (the 2014 distribution) is recommended with the understanding that once the 2015 CDBG budget is finalized, if an increase in funding is available, CAPSH could receive additional funds. HOME Line HOME Line provides tenant advocacy services for low income Edina renters with a Tenant Hotline offering tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. In 2014 they experienced a 13% increase in clientele, serving 125 families and preventing approximately 8 evictions. Recently, HOME Line added Somali and Spanish speaking tenant advocates to their staff and has embarked on an initiative to make sure these immigrant communities are aware of the services available. HOME Line is requesting $4,910 (a $1,140 increase from 2014), and it is recommended that their request be met. The following is a breakdown of the Public Services final 2014 CDBG budget, the 2015 requests from the service providers, and the recommended 2015 CDBG budget: TOTAL $ 19,030 $ 21,050 $ 19,030 Community Development - 85 % of total ($126,866) budget = $107,836 After the $19,030 distribution for public services, $107,836 remains to be directed toward community development projects addressing the housing needs of low and moderate income individuals in the community. In years past, the Community Development funds have been distributed between the Rehabilitation of Private Property program and West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (W HAH LT). The Rehabilitation of Private Property program provides deferred repayment loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied homes with no more than 4 dwelling units per property. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule established by HUD for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not exceed 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI), which for a 4 person household is currently $99,500. Hennepin County facilitates this program and reports that currently, there is $180,000 available in the program with no waiting list. The large reserve of funds is a result of former loans being paid off and recycled back into the program to again assist Edina homeowners maintain their homes. In an effort to raise awareness of the housing rehab program, we are working with the Communication's Department to advertise the program in the city's publications. However, due to the large reserve of funds currently available for the Rehabilitation of Private Properties program it is recommended that the program not receive funding in the 2015 budget cycle. It is recommended that all of the $107,836 community development funds be distributed to West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) for their Homes Within Reach program 2014 2015 2015 PROVIDER BUDGET REQUESTS RECOMMENDATION H.O.M.E. $ 10,095 $ 10,095 $ 8,955 C.A.P.S.H. $ 5,165 $ 6,000 $ 5,165 HOME Line $ 3,770 $ 4,910 $ 4,910 TOTAL $ 19,030 $ 21,050 $ 19,030 Community Development - 85 % of total ($126,866) budget = $107,836 After the $19,030 distribution for public services, $107,836 remains to be directed toward community development projects addressing the housing needs of low and moderate income individuals in the community. In years past, the Community Development funds have been distributed between the Rehabilitation of Private Property program and West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (W HAH LT). The Rehabilitation of Private Property program provides deferred repayment loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied homes with no more than 4 dwelling units per property. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule established by HUD for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not exceed 120% of the Area Median Income (AMI), which for a 4 person household is currently $99,500. Hennepin County facilitates this program and reports that currently, there is $180,000 available in the program with no waiting list. The large reserve of funds is a result of former loans being paid off and recycled back into the program to again assist Edina homeowners maintain their homes. In an effort to raise awareness of the housing rehab program, we are working with the Communication's Department to advertise the program in the city's publications. However, due to the large reserve of funds currently available for the Rehabilitation of Private Properties program it is recommended that the program not receive funding in the 2015 budget cycle. It is recommended that all of the $107,836 community development funds be distributed to West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) for their Homes Within Reach program REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 which provides an affordable homeownership opportunity using the Community Land Trust model for income eligible homebuyers. The Community Land Trust model removes the market value of the land from the mortgage equation, thus reducing the cost of a home for a work -force family by approximately 30 -50 percent, making it more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. WHAHLT owns the land and the homeowner owns the home. A Ground Lease signed by both parties defines and secures the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT and the homeowner, including, but not limited to a resale /recapture provision, and long -term rights and use of the land. One of the strategies identified in the Housing element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the City's commitment to fund and expand its financial and technical support of community land trusts. Attesting to this goal, since 2007, the City has provided $804,253 in CDBG assistance to WHAHLT - assisting in the purchase, rehabilitation and resale of nine Edina homes to income eligible buyers. The last Edina home purchased by WHAHLT completed in January 2014 required combining the 2012 and 2013 CDBG budgets totaling $108,222 due to the high cost of housing in the community. The 2014 CDBG budget of $56,903 has yet to be spent. Moving forward, the proposed $107,836 when added to the $56,903, 2014 funds, will provide $164,739 toward assisting WHAHLT to purchase two land trust homes, reinforcing the City's commitment to providing and securing affordable housing in the community. Over the past year, the city has advertised the aforementioned programs as well as other social services available to Edina residents through the City of Edina's website, the "About Town" magazine, and activities directories; and will continue to do so in the year to come. ATTACHMENTS: *Resolution 2015 -20 *Hennepin County PRELIMINARY 2015 CDBG Allocations *2010 — 2015 CDBG Budget Breakdown *Requesting Agencies Funding Requests RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -20 APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2015 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNENPIN COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the city of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, the city of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the city held a public hearing on February 17, 2015 to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of $126,866 from the 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the following projects for funding from the 2015 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. Activity Budget Senior Community Services $ 8,955 Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) $ 5,165 HOME Line $ 4,910 Homes Within Reach — Affordable Housing $ 107,836 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2015 Community Development Block Grant Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2015 CDBG available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager /Administrator to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or decrease in funding. Dated: February 17, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ Hennepin County Estimated 2015 CDBG Allocations Community Based on 2014 Allocation Brooklyn Center $243,462 Brooklyn Park $486,089 Crystal $107,956 Edina $126,866 Hopkins $113,831 Maple Grove $136,273 New Hope $136,323 Richfield $205,188 St. Louis Park $199,308 Subtotal $1,755,296 Consolidated Pool $459,093 Community Allocation Total $2,214,389 Hennepin County Administration $330,886 County Entitlement Total 25545,275 C:\ Users \jrepyaWppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \K9BZFLTK \Estimated allocation by city.xlsx Public Service: 15% Sr. Comm. Services - H.O.M.E. CAPSH HOME Line Community Development: 85% Rehab of Private Prc Affordable Housing ( 173,786 ( +7.7% $26,067 $17,789 $5.624 CDBG BUDGET 2010-2015 2011 2012 145,365 (-16.1%, $110,285 ( -24.1 $21,805 $16,543 $14,880 $9,618 $4,700 $4,700 $147,719 $123,560 arty $65,719 $54,985 HAHLT) $82,000 $68,575 PanP 1 $2 $93,742 $105,971 $107,836 $107,836 $41,891 $50,000 $50,933 $52,251 $55,971 $56,904 $107,836 Final Planning 2013 2014 2015 $124,671 ( +13 %) $126,866 ( +1.76 %) Same as 2014 $18,700 $19,030 $19,030 $10,095 $10,095 $8,955 $5,000 $5,165 $5,165 $3,605 $3,770 $4.910 $93,742 $105,971 $107,836 $107,836 $41,891 $50,000 $50,933 $52,251 $55,971 $56,904 $107,836 Senior Reimagine Aging Community = 1 11 Services Executive Committee January 13, 2015 Woody Love continue to lead a vital and engaging life: President Thad Standley Joyce Repya 1stVice President Associate Planner Laurie Lafontaine City of Edina 2 nd Vice President 4801 West 50,h Street Beth Falkenberg Edina, MN 55424 Secretary Minor home repairs /handyman services Bruce Thiel Dear Joyce, Treasurer Terri Urbaniak Thank you for the opportunity to submit a CDBG application to the City of Executive Member -at -Large Edina for $10,095. The Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) Matt Bochnicek program's operating budget for the City of Edina is $26,000. The Edina Executive Member -at -Large Housing Foundation has partnered with the HOME program in the past to make Jim Grist Past President up the difference in our operating budget for the city. Board of Directors HOME provides the following services to help seniors remain independent and Sharon Burnham continue to lead a vital and engaging life: David Fisher Rochelle Gi II Marvin Johnson Homemaking (dishwashing, laundry, grocery shopping, cleaning) John Lawson Yard work Cathy Medich Snow removal Jeanette Metz Dr. Chinyere Njaka Indoor & outdoor painting Gen Olson Minor home repairs /handyman services Walter White Safety improvements Scott Zerby Deb Taylor, CEO Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. If you have any Programs questions or need more information please feel free to call me at 952- 767 -7897 • Caregiver Support Services or email me at d.taylorkseniorcommunit�or g • Community Senior Centers • Health Insurance Counseling Sincerely, • H.O.M.E. • Senior Outreach •Senior Partners Care 10201 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 335 Deb Taylor Minnetonka, MN 55305 CEO fax: 952.541.0841 tel: 952.541.1019 vww.seniorcommunity.org Public Service Application (family, youth and senior services) Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program Year 2015 Please answer below in this column Genera Horn: Organization: Senior Community Services Type of entity: Nonprofit Organization 501 (c) 3 CDBG funding request: $10,095 Use of CDBG funding (e.g. staff labor costs): Fund the Sliding Fee Scale Contact person: Deb Taylor Phone /Email: 952- 767 -7897 / d.taylor @seniorcommunity.org Program Information: What is the program name /type of service? Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) Chore Service, a program of Senior Community Services Is this an existing CDBG- funded program? Yes Where is the program located, if applicable? Administrative Office is located in Minnetonka What is the service area of this program? Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Deephaven, Eden Prairie, Edina, Excelsior, Golden Valley, Greenwood, Hopkins, Long Lake, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, Minnetonka Beach, Mound, New Hope, Orono, Osseo, Plymouth, Richfield, Robbinsdale, Shorewood, Spring Park, St. Louis Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata, and Woodland. Who is the target clientle? Services are provided to Edina residents, age 60 +, on a sliding fee basis. What needs does this program address? The mission of Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) is to assist older adults to maintain their dignity and live independently by providing accessible, reliable, and affordable homemaker, home maintenance and chore services. Is the need growing? Yes. According to the former MN State Demographer, Tom Gillaspy, by the year 2020, there will be more people over the age of 65 than school age children. Suburban Hennepin County has more people over the age of 60 than Dakota and Ramsey Counities combined (2010 Census Data). A host of studies show that seniors prefer to stay in their own homes and in their local nieghborhoods. How does the program address these needs? Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) helps seniors remain in their homes in dignity and safety by providing reliable and affordable homemaking, grab bars & other safety installations, minor repairs, exterior home maintenance, interior and exterior painting, yard work, lawn mowing, and snow removal on a sliding fee scale based on income. How many persons were served by this program in the last 12 months? 47 residents served. This number is down, but the hours of service remained high at 1,703.5 What is your goal for number of persons served July 2015 -June 2016? 70 What percentage of clients are (or are estimated to be) low and moderate- income persons? CDBG requires at least 51 %. 100% Staffing and Financial Capacity: Describe the organization's experience in providing this service, staff capacity and staff qualifications: Jon Burkhow is the Director of the Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) program. He has been working in the field of aging since 2001. He currently overseas all aspects of the HOME program and is focused on expanding HOME's service offerings as well as bringing Minneapolis into the HOME delivery area. Jon graduated from Gustavus Adolphus College with a BA in Asian Studies. Jeanne Tramel Rasmussen has over ten years of expertise regarding volunteer management. She has worked for over fifteen years in a variety of nonprofit organizations and has a Master of Education from the University of Minnesota. Jeanne is the Outreach & Volunteer Coordinator for the HOME program. Valerie Anderson has been working in the non -profit field for over 13 years and is currently working on her AA in business management. She has been responsible for recruiting, training and overall direction of employees and volunteers that perform services for seniors. Valerie is currently a coordinator of the HOME program where she assesses, and assigns homemakers for seniors. Christine Tzanakis graduated from the University of Minnesota —Twin Cities in May of 2012. She is currently a coordinator for the HOME program where she coordinates lawn mowing, snow removal, maintenance and painting services for seniors enrolled in the program. Beth Hambel brings over 25 years of diverse experience in corporate management to the HOME Program. She is the point of first contact for potential new clients and helps all clients connect with a HOME Program Coordinator or Senior Community Services program they need. She is also using her skills in data management, accounting and office administration to strengthen and broaden the agency's resources for operational needs. Awards must be spent by June 30, 2016, and it is requested that funds be spent by April 1, 2016. When is the anticipated date to expend the funds? By April 1, 2016. ng Sources __— ___.-__ -_- m k Aount CDBG _...'_ ... -. $84,973 Other federal $159,000 State funding $27,000 Local funding $26,575 Corporate contributions $ Foundation contributions $71,000 Other (specify)Fee for Services - Sliding Fee Scale $295,000 Other (specify)United Way & Individual Donations $32,200 Consistency with Plans and Public Support: Is this a high, medium, or low priority service according to the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan? *Applications will be reviewed and ranked based on the 2015 -2019 Consolidated Plan high priorities, use the 2010 -2014 priorities as a reference. Describe any multi- community, multi - agency or public/private partnership support: Senior Services: Home Maintenance & Chores, which is identified as a high priority in the Consolidated Plan. Participation in the Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) program assures access to additional resources and services that would benefit the older adult. Additional services are provided in a seamless manner, consistent with our Mission, as part of our comprehensive approach to helping older adults live independently in their own homes. Many frail elders utilize other Senior Community Services' services, such as care coordination, participation in physical fitness, educational, recreational and social activities outside their home through Senior Community Services' five senior center and community-based programs; or support for their family members through caregiver coaching and counseling. In addition, Senior Community Services has successfully established partnerships with over 255 other agencies, units of government, churches, school districts and local community programs to provide access to services such as respite, adult day services and home care, meals on wheels, transportation, etc., and ensures that Senior Community Services provides an integrated, non - duplicative service system for every elder, regardless of that person's entry point into Senior community Services. There are many other for profit providers that provide some parts of the comprehensive services that HOME provides, but these services are provided at market rate. The HOME program provides critical services to help seniors remain in their home on a sliding fee scale. We also use volunteers to provide spring and fall yard cleanup free of charge to the client. There are often trust issues when it comes to a senior letting a stranger in their home to provide any service. The HOME program surveys Its clients and the top three reasons that seniors chose the HOME program over other for profit providers Is: 1. They cannot afford to pay the market rate. 2. They trust the HOME program's staff. Describe how the activity meets a need not currently or adequately being addressed by other services: 3. They are unable to do the work themselves. Energy Assistance Homebuyer Education Foreclosure Prevention Reverse Mortgage Home Maintenance & Rehab Homeless Services Employment Counseling Financial Counseling Planning & Development Community Development Voter Education & Registration Asset Development 8800 Highway 7, Suite 401 St Louis Park, MN 55426 Tel 952-697-1300 Fax 952- 933 -8016 V a Helping People. Changing Lives. community P A R T N E R S H I P Z,OF OF SUBURBAN NENNEPIN ANIMCM POVERTY FIGRIING NEIWOHK January 22, 2015 City of Edina Community Development Department 4801 W. 50 °i Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner RE: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin 2015 Application for CDBG Funding Dear Ms. Repya: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH) is pleased to submit its 2015 CDBG Public Service Funding request to the City of Edina. We are requesting $6,000 for the purpose of funding the CAPSH Full -Cycle Home Ownership Program. CAPSH, as the anti - poverty Community Action agency serving Suburban Hennepin County, has provided residents of Edina with services for over 20 years. CAPSH services to Edina include: full -cycle homeownership, energy assistance, free legal services and tax preparation, employment counseling and financial/budget counseling. We look forward to continuing to partner with the city of Edina and its surrounding communities to ensure access to housing services for low to moderate - income households. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Marcy Harris, Director of Planning, Development and Legal Services at 952- 697 -1325, or mharris @capsh.org. Sincerely, Christine Hart Community Developer 952 -697 -1364 chart@capsh.org Enel: Our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by creating and supporting links between Individuals and communities through: service, education, and collaboration. Public Service Application (family, youth and senior services) Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program Year 2015 Please answer below in this column General Information: Organization: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH) Type of entity: Non- profit CDBG funding request: $6,000.00 Use of CDBG funding (e.g. staff labor costs): Program Costs -- staff, program supplies, materials expenses Contact person: Marty Harris Phone /Email: (952) 967 -1325/ mharris @capsh.org Program Information: What is the program name /type of service? Full -Cycle Homeownership and Financial Literacy Programs CAPSH's certified Housing and Financial Literacy counselors provide services which include: • Foreclosure Prevention Counseling • First Time Homebuyer Education and Counseling • Reverse Mortgage Counseling and Home Repair and Maintenance • Financial Literacy Workshops • Senior Financial Security Workships: Avoiding Scams & Identity Theft CAPSH Full -Cycle Homeownership and Financial Literacy Programs provide participating residents budget counseling and financial education, assistance with making smart home - buying choices, and offer a range of other services that enable Edina residents to obtain and maintain safe, affordable housing as well as be financially responsible. Is this an existing CDBG- funded program? Yes Where is the program located, if applicable? CAPSH provides services at various sites throughout suburban Hennepin County. Services are available to all Edina residents. What is the service area of this program? Suburban Hennepin County Who is the target clientle? For the Full -Cycle Homeownership programs, our target clientele are residents on the verge of foreclosure, first -time homebuyers, seniors (62 years and older) who are in need of reverse mortgage assistance, and houses requiring maintenance and repair in order to alleviate and prevent further structural problems. All of our clients are low- to moderate income residents of Suburban Hennepin County. Overall, approximately 80% of clients served have incomes of 80% of lower of AMI. For Financial Literacy, our target clientele are low- income residents who need to repair and restore credit as well as improve budgeting skills. Our Senior Financial Security Workshops target seniors, who are vulnerable to identity theft and scams. What needs does this program address? Full -Cycle Homeownership programs address a variety of needs: T • Foreclosure Prevention: provides foreclosure prevention counseling to Edina residents in danger of losing their homes due to delinquency. • First Time Homebuyer Education & Counseling: offers homeownership information to equip new homeowners with knowledge on what to expect and how to finance and care for their home. After completing the workshop, they are eligible to receive one -on -one counseling to improve financial status and credit. • Reverse Mortgage Counseling: offers information on working with lenders and discusses the available options for eligible seniors (62 years and older) in need of additional finances. CAPSH does not endorse taking a reverse mortgage, nor does it endorse particular lenders or products. -Home Repair and Maintenance: assists in critical home repairs or maintenance needed to maintain habitability. •Financial Literacy: assists clients in restoring their credit, working with lenders, and using preventative measures to avoid scams and identity theft. Is the need growing? The most recent Minnesota Homeownership Center Report reported a 20% in the demand for pre - purchase counseling, a 7% increase in Homestretch homebuyer workshop participation, and a 29% decrease in foreclosures in Minnesota. While the decrease in the numbers of foreclosures is significant, it is important to note that homes are still being lost through foreclosure at rates exceeding twice those of historic levels. CAPSH's Homeownership program results in Edina, and overall, reflect these shifts. Pre - purchase counseling increased 5- fold in 2014 vs 2013 and homebuyer education increased 11% and foreclosure prevention counseling decreased 25 %. Hennepin County research also shows the number of residents older than age 46 increased almost 70 percent between 1990 and 2010. As the number of seniors in suburban Hennepin County rises, so does the need to disseminate more information about different scams used to prey upon seniors in particular, and how to remain financially secure in the face of less income. The most successful way we have found to disseminate this information is through workshops. How does the program address these needs? Foreclosure Prevention: through its certified program and certified counselors CAPSH will provide foreclosure prevention counseling to Edina residents in danger of losing their homes due to delinquency. Our counselors work directly with clients to resolve their housing needs in a manner best suited to their financial status and other needs. • Counselors work with clients from initial stages of facing foreclosure through sheriffs sales (and even provide counseling up to eviction following the redemption period). • Significant counseling time is devoted to reviewing clients' financial situations to evaluate if they are able to maintain their current housing in the long run. • Counselors work directly with clients and their lenders to renegotiate mortgage terms that allow clients to stay in their homes when feasible. Foreclosure prevention counselors work with lenders to negotiate mortgage modifications, refinancing, short sales and other means of resolving the homeowner's housing crisis. Homebuyer Education: CAPSH provides First -Time Homebuyer workshops using the Homestretch curriculum developed by the Minnesota Homeownership Center. • Workshops are offered in multiple-session evening classes or single - session workshops to make them easily accessible. • Participants review budget and financial considerations, what things to look for when purchasing, and options for financing. Participants also learn about repair and maintenance issues to consider before and after a purchase. • Participants hear from real estate agents and lenders about the home - buying process from their perspective, giving participants Insight into what to expect. • Homebuyer workshops total 8 hours, after which time the clients receive certificates of completion. Many lenders now require first -time homebuyers complete the workshop to ensure they understand the lending process and their financial obligations. Homebuyer Prepurchase Counseling: once participants have completed the Homestretch workshop they are eligible to receive individual counseling at CAPSH. • Counselors examine a client's financial status In more detail, and work with clients to develop budgets and work on credit repair, with the goal of positioning clients to obtain home purchase financing. • Counseling may take place In different time Increments to allow clients time to Improve their credit. • Clients meet with the counselor in 45 minute— 2 hour increments depending on needs and circumstances. Reverse Mortgage: CAPSH provides oneonone, In- person counseling to eligible clients (one spouse must be at least 62 years old and meet financial eligibility requirements) who are interested in a reverse mortgage. • The Reverse Mortgage counselor meets with seniors interested in the program to discuss with them the nature and requirements of a reverse mortgage, available options, and the consequences of taking out this mortgage. The counselor provides information about how to work with lenders. • CAPSH does not endorse taking a reverse mortgage, nor does it endorse particular lenders or products. Home Repair and Maintenance: the Home Rehab counselor works with low- Income clients in need of critical home repairs or maintenance needed to maintain habitability. • Counselor provides advice about what types of repairs are necessary, how to obtain suitable contractors, and how to obtain financial assistance, particularly through municipal programs. • The counselor may work with city housing authorities to advise the client on necessary repairs, review the work after completion, and certify whether the work was appropriately completed. • This is a much - needed service for low- Income homeowners who may not be able to determine on their own the repair work needed, or how to pick out a legitimate contractor. How many persons were served by this program in th- •Homebuyer Education: 4 Edina households •Homebuyer Prepurchase Counseling: 4 Edina households -Foreclosure Prevention: 9 Edina households -Reverse Mortgage: 15 Edina households -Home Repair and Maintenance: 0 Edina households -Total: 32 Edina households What is your goal for number of persons served July 2 •Homebuyer Education: 5 Edina households •Homebuyer Prepurchase Counseling: 6 Edina households -Foreclosure Prevention: 7 Edina households -Reverse Mortgage: 15 Edina households -Home Repair and Maintenance: 2 Edina households -Financial Literacy & Senior Financial Security Workshops: 6 Edina households -Projected Total: 41 Edina households We plan to increase the number of persons served by continuing to expand CAPSH's outreach activities. CAPSH is developing a plan to raise awareness of its Homeownership services by expanding its web based presence, adding links to its programs and services on the MNHOC and MHFA websites and public awareness campaigns. CAPSH makes available information on our programs through digital advertising on monitors at Hennepin County Service Centers and in- person at our numerous outreach events throughout suburban Hennepin County for CAPSH Programs including Energy Assistance, SNAP (Food Support), Legal Advice Clinics (5 Clinics per month) Tax Preparation Assistance Clinics (twenty plus Clinics scheduled from February 1 through April 15) . Our Outreach Team also attends numerous Community- sponsored events throughout suburban Hennepin County. What percentage of clients are (or are estimated to Overall, approximately 85% of clients served have incomes of 80% of lower of AMI. be) low and moderate - income persons? CDBG Staffing and Financial Capacity: Describe the organization's experience in providing Describe the organization's experience in providing this service, staff capacity and staff qualifications: this service, staff capacity and staff qualifications: CAPSH has offered housing services since 1992. CAPSH counselors are certified by Minnesota Homeownership Center ( MNHOC), Minnesota Mortgage Foreclosure Prevention Association (MMFPA), and The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In fact, we are the only HUD certified provider of homeownership services that deliver services at no -cost to clients. Additionally, CAPSH recently completed the cross - training and certifications of all its Homeownership Counselors for the Home Buyer and Home Owner services offered. This provides the flexibility to respond to the changing demand for specific programs and service Irl response to the improving economy. Our counselors are now trained and certified to provide services across all our programs in response to the changing demands of the market Awards must be spent by June 30, 2016, and it is Funds will be expended by the requested due date of April 1, 2016. requested that funds be spent by April 1, 2016. Funding Sources Amount CDBG $6,000 Prior Year CDBG Funding - This Project $5,165 Other: HUD/ NFMC Counseling Funding $114,000 Other: Other CDBG Funding $116,855 Other: Community Action Grants $300,345 Other: MN Housing Counseling Grants 85,000 Other: Homebuyer Education Fees 25,000 Other: Hennepin County Foreclosure Assistance 215,000 Total $866,700 Consistency with Plans and Public Support: Is this a high, medium, or low priority service High according to the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan? 'Applications will be reviewed and ranked based on Describe any multi - community, multi - agency or CAPSH partners with over 275 community organizations, faith -based organizations and local, state and federal governments and agencies. Aside public /private partnership support: from providing CDBG- funded programs on behalf of cities such as Edina, CAPSH provides information and referrals for housing matters (particularly first time homebuyer assistance programs and foreclosure prevention counseling) with city offices. Futhermore, CAPSH works closely with city offices to conduct and coordinate workshops and other events, including Financial Security Workshops. CAPSH participates with local, state, and federal housing agencies and social services providers to conduct housing fairs and outreach activities. In addition to being active participants in partnership and collaborative efforts involving government housing agencies at various levels of government, CAPSH has a staff member on the board of MMFPA. Describe how the activity meets a need not currently CAPSH's programs focus on low- income people's need for housing and financial stability through unique services not otherwise readily available in or adequately being addressed by other services: the community. For instance, low- income homeowners have the opportunity to get personalized counseling. Seniors are able to access services that protect them from range of problems, everything from losing their home to losing their savings. CAPSH makes these services accessible by offering them at multiple locations and times, and makes them accessible to law- income clients by offering the majority of services and programs for free (exception is Homebuyer Education - CAPSH is required by State of Minnesota to charge a fee). Agency: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin - Edina Dates: 7/112013 through 6/30/2014 3z,- 32-1 C O CO O to O CO + c6 U m CU Q E Q CO = C E Q C Q 06 M @ O M n � f— _ N M V' lfl CO 1� W O N O 7/01 - 9/30/2013 1 1 3 5 3 2 5 10/1 - 12/31/2013 0 4 0 1 5 5 5 1/1 - 3/31/2014 1 a 1 2 12 10 1 1 12 4/1 - 6/30/2014 2 3 2 3 10 9 1 10 3z,- 32-1 Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin Housing Programs Budget 2014 -2015 Component ALL Edina CDBG Other Sources of Expenses PROGRAMS FUNDING $2,000.00 Funding Component Edina CDBG Other TOTAL Sala $330,275.00 $2,000.00 $328,275.00 $330,275.00 Federal: HUD, NFMC, CSBG State: M H FA, M GAG County: Hennepin Cty Benefits $99,471.00 $750.00 $98,721.00 $99,471.00 Professional /Contract services $100,780.00 $100,780.00 $100,780.00 Travel $46,500.00 $46,500.00 $46,500.00 MFPP Municipal: Various Direct Costs CDBG including Maple Grove Program - materials, supplies $63,742.00 $1,000.00 $62,742.00 $63,742.00 Private: Future grant applications Dues, cert. fees, training $9,350.00 $1,000.00 $8,350.00 $9,350.00 Other: Homebuyer Workshops Direct/Pass Through Assistance $174,198.00 $174,198.00 $174,198.00 Admin /M mt $21,857.00 $500.00 $21,357.00 $21,857.00 Indirect Costs Computer/Communications $19,840.00 $750.00 $19,090.00 $19,840.00 Indirect rent, phone, etc. $127,281.00 $127,281.00 $127,281.00 TOTALI $993,294.00 $6,000.00 $987,294.00 $993,294.00 t� .. �a� 3455 Bloomington Ave Minneapolis, MN 55407 Joyce Repya Associate Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Repya, Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Fax: 612/728 -5761 www.homelinemn.org January 21, 2015 This letter is to request funding in the amount of $4,910 from the City of Edina's Community Development Block Grant Program to support HOME Line's services for renters. A copy of the 2015 CDBG Program Request for Funding is enclosed. Along with the CDBG Request Form, I am enclosing summaries of our hotline's service to Edina residents. In 2014, HOME Line's Tenant Hotline served 125 Edina families, prevented an estimated 8 evictions, and saved Edina residents an estimated $20,578. HOME Line has added Somali and Spanish Speaking Tenant Advocates to our staff and would like to work with the city to make sure these immigrant communities know about HOME Line's services available in their own languages. HOME Line is working to meet the current challenges facing low- income renters and would like the City of Edina to continue as our partner in meeting these needs. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 612/728 -5770, extension 107 or Mike Vraa, our managing attorney at extension 113. Sincerely, Beth Kodluboy Executive Director enclosures as noted Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota sa Public Service Application (family, youth and senior services) Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program Year 2015 General Information: Organization: Type of entity: CDBG funding request: Use of CDBG funding (e.g. staff labor costs): Contact person: Phone /Email: Program Information: What is the program name /type of service? Is this an existing CDBG- funded program? Where is the program located, if applicable? What is the service area of this program? Who is the target clientle? Please answer below in this column HOME Line Non- profit Staff Labor Costs Mile Vraa Managing Attorney /Hotline Director 612 728 -5770 x113 mil<ev @homelinemn.org Tenant Hotline Services Yes Phone service City wide Low Income Renters $4,910 What needs does this program address? Renters make up nearly 5,733 households in Edina, and many of these families have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes, those who don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose security deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. Additionally, the latest census information shows that Edina now has 1,038 Spanish speaking residents. Edina also has 760 African born immigrants from Subsaharan Africa. These immigrant communities are more likely to be renters, low- income, and because of language and cultural barriers, more susceptible to poor rental practices. Is the need growing? Yes, 13% increase in calls over last year What percentage of clients are (or are estimated to be) low and moderate- income persons? CDBG requires at least 51 %. 80% Staffing and Financial Capacity: Describe the organization's experience in providing this service, staff capacity and staff qualifications: The Tenant Hotline began in 1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin County residents. Today we serve the entire state Awards must be spent by June 30, 2016, and it is requested that funds be spent by April 1, 2016. When is the anticipated date to expend the funds? April 1, 2016 Funding Sources Amount CL?BG $88,436 Other federal 0 State funding 100 000 Local funding - -- - ___--- - - - - -- -- ------------- - - - - -- 139 ,787, Corporate contributions 0 Foundation contributions $143,717 Other (Hotline Training, Attorneys Fees, Books Sales, Contributions) $53,100 Other (Funders to be developed, new earned income) 103,412. Consistency with Plans and Public Support: Is this a high, medium, or low priority service according to the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan? *Applications will be reviewed and ranked based on the 2015 -2019 Consolidated Plan high priorities, use the 2010 -2014 priorities as a reference. High - Public Service - Housing Counseling Describe any multi- community, multi - agency or public /private partnership support: HOME Line has a history of successfully partnering with foundations and local and state governments to help support our Describe how the activity meets a need not currently or adequately being addressed by other services: The Attorney General's office refers tenants with questions to our hotline, but does not give tenants specific legal advice. How does the program address these needs? How many persons were served by this program in the last 12 months? What is your goal for number of persons served July 2015 - June 2016? HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. HOME Line's Tenant Hotline provides free legal advice to tenants about landlord /tenant law. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to illness from unsafe living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources. In 2014, our Tenant Hotline Services to Edina advised 125 renter households, helped prevent the eviction of 8 families, and saved tenants at least $20,578. The most common reasons Edina residents call our hotline are: repairs, and security deposits, and evictions. The need for this service in Edina is apparent -- Edina residents already rely on this valuable service. While our services are available to all renters free of charge, 80% of our Edina callers have low incomes; 70% of these callers are women; 22% are racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low- income renters. HOME Line's new language and cultural access initiative means that Somali and Spanish speaking renters can directly call our Somali and Spanish speaking Tenant advocates in their native languages and get assistance with their rental problems. 300 to -320 313 HOME Line's Tenant I otflnne in Edina-. 2014 OVERVIEW In 2014, 125 Edina renter households contacted HOME Line for Tenant Hotline Services. This represents service to approximately 313 residents when all family members have been counted. In 2014, there was a 13% increase in the numbers of callers over last year.The cost to serve Edina in 2015 is $4,910. HIGHLIGHTS In 2014, HOME Line helped renters from Edina: • Recover and/or save an estimated $20,578 • Prevent an estimated 8 evictions. • Renters with repair issues who follow our advice are 37% more likely to get their problem fixed than those who don't. • In landlord foreclosure, the average amount of days stayed after the sheriff's sale by renters we have helped is 180 days, and the amount of money saved by renters in landlord foreclosure is $4,748 in 2014. INCOME BREAKDOWN The vast majority (80 %) of these callers are extremely - low, very -low or low - income. These income categories are those used by the U. S. Department of H. U. D.: ® Extremely ow: Incomes below 30% of metro median. • Very Low: Incomes between 30% and 50% of metro median • Low: Incomes between 50% and 80% of metro median. • Moderate: Incomes above 80% of metro median. RACIAL BREAKDOWN 78% Caucasian 17% African American 4% Asian/Pacific Islander 2% Other Top Ten Reasons For Calls (2 0I4) 1. Repairs 29 2. Security Deposit 25 3. Eviction 11 4. Break Lease 11 5. Notice to Vacate 8 6. Neighbors 7 7. Infestation/Bed Bugs 6 8. Leases 4 9. Privacy/Intrusion 4 10. Foreclosure 4 Callers' Incomes Low Very Low '140% i nni GENDER BREAKDOWN 70% Female 30% Male Homes NCR Trans! rming January 20, 2015 Joyce Repya City of Edina Associate Planner 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Joyce; lives through home ownership Thank you for the opportunity to :submit the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust ( WHAHLT), dba Homes Within Reach (HWR), 2015 Edina CDBG application. The application consists of the fillable form provided by you and four exhibits. They include - • Exhibit 1 - Proposed Preliminary Sources & Uses • Exhibit 2 - Supplemental Information • Exhibit 3 - Community Land Trust and How it Works o Exhibit 4 - Equity Resale Provisions WHAHLT is seeking financial support from the City of Edina to accompany other matching funding sources to produce another affordable home in the community of Edina, using the Community Land Trust practice. This application will enable HWR to continue creating and preserving affordable homeownership in Edina, using the community land trust practice, which allows homeownership to be affordable for low /moderate income work -force families. We appreciate the support the City has provided to those we serve in Edina. We look forward to continuing our partnership in addressing the needs of affordable homeownership housing. Thank you for taking the time to review and consider our proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 401 -7071. Sincerely, Janet A. Lindbo Executive Director West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust 952 - 401.7071 tel info@HomesWithinReach.org C 5101 Thimsen Avenue, Suite 202, Minnetonka, MN 55345 952- 224 -2857 fax � __W Non Public Service Application Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program Year 2015 Please answer below in this column General Information: City: Edina Other partners (if any): West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) a 501 (c) (3) non profit Community Land Trust CDBG funding request: $107,836 Use of CDBG funding (e.g. acquisition of land, rehabilitation of public facility, sidewalk Acquisition of land, rehabilitation of homes in order to create and preserve two reconstruction, etc.): affordable homes in the City of Edina, using the Community Land Trust practice. Contact person: Janet Lindbo Phone and Email: 952 - 401 -7071, jlindbo @homeswithinreach.org Activity information: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) is requesting assistance to continue to offer the City of Edina a program that creates and preserves affordable homeownership using the Community Land Trust practice for low to moderate income workforce households, who otherwise would be unable to buy a home in Edina. This is achieved by acquiring and retaining the ownership of real property, rehabilitating and then selling the improvements (home) to buyers earning less than 80% Area Median Income (AMI). Community Land Trust homes remain affordable for consecutive generations of homeowners, because the resale restriction is the subsidy retention and is tied to the home not the owner. Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR, stay with the home and incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR Describe the activity: applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale- restricted domain of HWR and will remain affordable for low to moderate income households, through one resale after another. This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low to moderate income families over a long period. Please refer to the Supplemental information enclosed with the application - Exhibits 2, 3 & 4 for further information on the program and how it works. In summary, WHAHLT is a nonprofit — ganization, formed to hold title to land to preserve its long -term affordability, receives public and private donation of land or monies to purchase properties. The homes are sold to low -to- moderate income workforce families and HWR retains ownership of the land and provides a long -term ground lease to homebuyers to secure their rights to use the land. The proposed funding request will be matched with other funds to create and preserve two affordable homes in Edina, using the Community Land Trust practice. A specific Where will the activity be located? property address has yet to be determined. Once funding is finalized, HWR will search for a property to acquire based on purchase price, condition of property, location, matching contributions and applicants' needs. HWR's target market is households with incomes at 80% or less of area median income (AMI). HWR has served over 129 families who have become homeowners using the HWR program, with scores of 32% to 79% AMI, the average program wide AMI is What population(s) will benefit? 60.8% and 61.4% for the nine affordable CLT homes created in Edina. HWR supports work force families providing essential services to the community and surrounding suburbs who typically cannot afford to purchase an entry-level home in Edina due to high land costs, yet works, resides or has family who lives in the community. HWR program offers an opportunity for work force households to become Will this principally benefit low to homeowners, which in turn stabilizes the family unit, adds value to the community moderate- income persons /neighborhood where they work or live, by increasing the labor pool to local businesses, adding new families to the community, preserving and rehabilitating of existing housing stock and areas, or directly benefit populations providing a mechanism to invest in long -term affordable homeowership, thereby presumed to be low- income including linking housing with jobs, transit and support services. In addition, work force families seniors, abused children, battered spouses, provide essential services to maintain and sustain the infrastructure of Edina and homeless, disabled persons? surrounding communities. These jobs include but are not limited to custodians, health care workers clergy, etail workers administrative gy positions, food service providers and many more. In 2007, HWR implemented its Community Land Trust program in Edina and over the past seven years has assisted ten families (includes one resale) become homeowners, Anticipated accomplishments (numerical serving a total of 35 individuals. Please keep in mind that each one of these homes will goal): more than likely have 5 to 7 families own the home during the 99 year lease period - therefore serving at least 18 plus individuals per home. If awarded CDBG monies for 201512016, HWR will be able to create and preserve the tenth and the eleventh affordable home in Edina. Implement; Schedule - highest priority given to activities able to reque.,, reimbursement by April 1, 2016. Expenditure period is July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016. Tasks Anticipated Comoletion Date Application Process: Application, Orientation, Ongoing Homebuyer Education, Interview and approvals Acquisition /Rehab of Property: Property Search, Selection, Offer, Due Diligences /Multiple Inspections, Acquisition /Rehab, LC Approval, 6 + months Purchase of Property, Development of Specification and Rehab Plan & Execute Selling of the Home Process: Mortgage Application and Approval, Selection of Home, Board Committee 3 - 6 months Interview, Finalize Income Eligibility, Execute PA, Homebu er Inspection Closing Process: Attorney Review with Buyer, Final Home Inspection, Transfer Utilities, Coordination 60 days with Funders Buyers & Closer Close Project: Final Bills, Finalize Project Sources & Uses, Submit Paper work to Funders for Payment, 60 days pay off LC Commitment Staff ML, and Financial Caaacity: The staff of 2 + FTEs and contingent of partners, consultants and specialized vendors (contractors, housing specialists, inspectors, realtors, attorney, appraiser, closer, lenders and auditor etc.) have acquired over 116 properties and assisted 129 families Describe city staff capacity and experience own their home over the past 12 years. This team has provided the resources, relevant to administering this activity: expertise and services to accomplish the day -to -day activities in implementing the scope of services that include but not limited to fund development, housing production, outreach and marketing, compliance /reporting, transaction expertise needed to operate Homes Within Reach. Will additional staffing /resources need to be No secured? Awards must be spent by June 30, 2016, and applications score higher by being able to Most likely in the fall of 2015 or early 2016. expend by April 1, 2016. When is the anticipated date to expend the funds? 3 Funding Sou Amount Cnmmittarl? CDBG $107,836 application in process Prior Year CDBG (for this activity) Other federal funds (specify) HOME $110,000 $55,000 application in process and $55,000 from 2014 award Low Income Housing Tax Credits State (specify) Minnesota Housing $78,000 Committed Local (specify) AHIF $72,000 application in process Metropolitan Council Other (specify) application in process Total $367,836 Uses of Funds Amount Please refer to Exhibit 1 of the HWR Supplemental Information - the Preliminary sources and Uses for the Proposed Project. I Consistency Plans and Public Support: HWR program meets the Hennepin County Consolidated high priority for offering Is this a high, medium, or low priority service homeowership assistance by creating and preserving affordable homeownership according to the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan? options to workforce families (80 %AMI or lower) in the suburbs of Hennepin County. *Applications will be reviewed and ranked In addition, the program requires homeownership training by our applicants via the Homestretch Classes, which is another high priority within the plan and we work with based on the 2015 -2019 Consolidated Plan high homeowners when crisis arises and they need to participate in foreclosure prevention priorities, use the 2010 -2014 priorities as a measures. Additionally several of our families have members who are physically reference. disabled and work with us and Hennepin County and other non profits to make the home accessible and barrier free for the disabled family member. HWR has partnered and continues to with many suburban communities to support the HWR program and participates with local to support the HWR efforts. Additionally HWR partners with organizations like Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation, who administers a fix -up loan program for CLT homeowners for home improvements. Describe any community or private partnership Additionally, HWR is a member of the Minnesota CLT Coalition and where the organization works with its peers with respect to lobbying efforts, development of best support: practices, resources and products the CLT's offers to the work force families becoming homeowners. Furthermore, the organization with its team of consultants and specialized vendors (contractors, realtors, attorney, appraiser, closer, attorney, auditor etc.,) provide the resources, expertise and services to accomplish the day -to -day activities and tasks in creating and preserving affordable homeownership. The proposed activating of creating and sustaining affordable homeownership meets a community priority because of the challenges of providing affordable homeowership options and the need for additional suburban workforce housing since - land values are high and price of entry-level properties are out of the reach for many essential workers who work and or live in Edina and the surrounding areas. With land and housing costs exceeding the means of low to moderate income workforce households to purchase a home, the Community Land Trust was formed to create and preserve affordable Describe how the activity meets a locally homeownership for families that otherwise would be unable to buy a entry-level home identified high priority community where they work or live and not over burden their income to do so. The average home development need: sales price, sold by HWR in Edina is $139,833 which contrasts favorably to current median sales price in the City of Edina of $393,147 (median home value per Neighborhood Scout) throughout its 14 neighborhoods. The purpose of creating affordable homeowership offers an opportunity for low to moderate income families to become homeowners, which in turns stabilizes the family unit and adds value to Edina and protects the investment of the subsidy made possible by the funders. Therefore the program's activity - expands homeownership opportunities, enhances residential stability, preserve housing affordability and supports the community infrastructure. Exhibit 1 2015 Edina CDBG Application Preliminary Sources & Uses for Proposed Edina Housing Project Name of Properties Undetermined - proposed the creation of two affordable homes Date: January 2015 Proposed 2015 Proposed 2015 Single Cumulative 2 Property Properties Sources: Homebuyer Mortgage $145,000 $290,000 City of Edina CDBG $53,913 $107,826 HWR Matching Funds $130,000 $260,000 Total $328,913 $657,826 Uses: Acquisition Costs $270,000 $540,000 Closing Costs $2,400 $4,800 Inspections /Testing $1,600 V $3,200 Acquisition costs $274,000 $548,000 Adm Fee 1 $5,000 $10,000 Project/Holding /LC /Closing Costs $14,000 $28,000 Rehab Costs $35,913 $71,826 Total $328,913 $657,826 Exhibit 2 2015 Edina CDBG Application Exhibit 2 2015 Edina CDBG Application Supplemental Information for Submission of CDBG Application West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) was created in May 2001 and commenced implementation of the program in 2002; a Community Land Trust, creating long -term affordable homeownership for workforce families in the western suburban communities in Hennepin County; thereby enhancing community vitality by working in partnership with public agencies and private organizations in addressing the need for affordable homeownership. HWR has served eleven (11) communities in western Hennepin County including the City of Edina. • West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust vision is to transform people's lives through homeownership. • The mission is to use the Community Land Trust practice to provide housing for working families that would be otherwise unable to buy in the West Hennepin suburban communities, offering both communities and homebuyers the ability to sustain permanently affordable homeownership. • Its goal is to create and sustain affordable homeownership in the suburbs of Hennepin County, through the implementation of its Homes Within Reach program. This is achieved by acquiring properties in the suburban communities of Hennepin County; and in turn, rehabilitate and sell the homes to qualified households earning less than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) using the Community Land Trust Practice. The establishment of WHAHLT, later named Homes Within Reach (HWR) was in direct response to the City of Minnetonka's interest in developing a means of increasing the number of permanent affordable homes in Minnetonka and in the western suburban communities of Hennepin County for low to moderate income households. Thus making efficient use of its financial investment and providing a vehicle to meet the communities' housing goals and objectives. Since 2002 HWR has assisted over 129 families in becoming homeowners, of which 10 are families (includes one resale) in the City of Edina. Rea uest• West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR), a non - profit corporation is seeking a CDBG grant of $107,836 from the City of Edina to assist in creating and preserving two affordable homes in the City of Edina, using the Community Land Trust practice, for work -force families (50 %- 80% of the area median income). City of Edina: In 2007, Homes Within Reach implemented its program in Edina, providing affordable homeowership opportunities to two families in the City of Edina. From 2007 through 2014, Homes Within Reach has created nine affordable homes in Edina. The chart to the right highlights the funds applied to each home by the City of Edina CDBG monies and HWR matching funds in creating and preserving nine affordable Edina homes. In 2014, HWR combined the 2012 & 2013 CDBG award and applied it to one property because the land value of the entry -level property exceeded $160,000. Average land value for the nine CLT properties in Edina is $143,000. Currently, it is HWR experience that entry -level properties' land values are exceeding $150,000 per parcel in Edina. The average HWR sales price for the Edina homes Allocation of Funds 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2007 2008 _2009 homes home 2 2010 2112 2013 2014 homes home 1 1 home home home ■ City of Edina ■ HWR using HWR Community Land Trust program over the past seven years is $139,833; serving families with an Area Median Income (AMI) of 61.4 %. 1 Exhibit 2 2015 Edina CDBG Application Program Profile: • Population Served: D HWR's target market is households with incomes at 80% or less of Area Median Income (AMI). In practice, HWR has served households between 32% and 79% AMI, the average AMI is 60.8% program wide and 61.4% in Edina. 0 Average Income for leaseholders is $42,807 and the average in Edina is $45,427. • HWR & Edina Profile: How HWR Community Land Trust Works: HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Please refer to Exhibt 3 & 4 for further detail on how the Community Land Trust works. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the Ground Lease, even after the resale of the homes. Given that HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and HWR execute a Ground Lease that defines the roles and responsibilities of both HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long- term rights to the land. In addition, they have full use of the land and responsibility for the property. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to WHAHLT or a qualified buyer. The resale price is limited by a formula which more than likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down - payment as well as all principal that has been paid) plus a percentage (35 %) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR to purchase the land, stay with HWR and incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale- restricted domain of HWR and will remain affordable for low -to- moderate income households, through one resale after another. The components of permanent housing affordability and subsidy retention create and sustains the affordability of the homes through the HWR program. Therefore, the removal of the market value of the land from the mortgage equation provides initial affordability and permanent affordability is otained through: 0 A pricing formula that provides the owner with an amount of equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and 0 A resale restriction that requires the homeowner to sell the house to another qualified household. 2 2002 -2014 2002 -2014 Categories HWR Edina Comments Totals Totals Total HWR Parcels 116 9 HWR Households 113 9 HWR Resales i5 1 HWR Total Families Served 128 10 HWR Average Income Served $42,807 $46,458 HWR Area Median Income 60.8% 61.4% Income and family size drives Served (%) AMI calculation HWR Average Final Mortgage $908 $1,036 Includes PITI Amount HWR Average Sale Price $125,950 $139,833 HWR Number Persons Served 413 33 Number of Communities Served 11 1 How HWR Community Land Trust Works: HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Please refer to Exhibt 3 & 4 for further detail on how the Community Land Trust works. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the Ground Lease, even after the resale of the homes. Given that HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and HWR execute a Ground Lease that defines the roles and responsibilities of both HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long- term rights to the land. In addition, they have full use of the land and responsibility for the property. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to WHAHLT or a qualified buyer. The resale price is limited by a formula which more than likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down - payment as well as all principal that has been paid) plus a percentage (35 %) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR to purchase the land, stay with HWR and incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale- restricted domain of HWR and will remain affordable for low -to- moderate income households, through one resale after another. The components of permanent housing affordability and subsidy retention create and sustains the affordability of the homes through the HWR program. Therefore, the removal of the market value of the land from the mortgage equation provides initial affordability and permanent affordability is otained through: 0 A pricing formula that provides the owner with an amount of equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and 0 A resale restriction that requires the homeowner to sell the house to another qualified household. 2 Exhibit 2 2015 Edina CDBG Application Therefore, a one -time investment in the cost of the land and other related expenses creates a permanently affordable home and in turn maximizes the effectiveness of the investment in affordable housing while providing the benefits of home ownership to households that are otherwise unable to buy a home in Edina. Please refer to Exhibit 3 & 4 for further detail. Method of Aparoach and Implementation of Schedule MONTHS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Creation of one Affordable Home 1. Application Process Informational Meeting Application Orientation & Homebu er Education Interviews and Income verification Meeting with Lender process application Pre-approvals 2. Acquisition Property Search Property Selection Purchase Offer of Selected Property Due - Diligence Period & Admin - Determine Scope of Rehab LC Finalize offer, remove contingencies Acquire property Rehab 3. Selling/Closing Selling/Closing Process Mort a e ADDlication and approval Selection of Property HWR Resident Committee Interview, Finalize income eligibility Execute PA home inspection, attorney review Closing - coordination with funders buyers, closer HWR acquires, rehabilitates and then turns around and sells the home to a qualified family using the land trust practice. The following graph highlights the major components of HWR housing production timeline. Please keep in mind that multiple steps can be completed concurrently or previously - therefore it does not take 12 months to purchase a home, if the applicant is financially ready and there are available homes in their desired community where they work or live The Application Process can take place at any time, however once a property is located and acquired, many times applicants need to be reapproved for a mortgage, if their pre - approval is more than 60 days old; especially in these times of changing lending requirements. With respect to the 2015/2016 proposed activity, a specific location in the City of Edina has not yet been predetermined prior to approving this proposed activity. Properties typically are selected and acquired once the funding commitment has been completed, along with matching funds. Properties are typically acquired as opportunities arise due to market conditions and the requirements of the HWR acqusition process. Required repair and rehabiliative work are those renovations that will provide the buyers good operating condition of the home and property, promote a safe environment and permit the reuse of structurally sound buildings, many of which were constructed in a manner that is superior to some of today's housing products. Example of Edina Land Trust Homes 3 Exhibit 2 2015 Edina CDBG Application The Benefits and Value of the HWR program To the Edina Community are — Homes Within Reach is an excellent affordable homeownership program that enhances the community through collaborating with public and private organizations in transforming lives through homeownership - by: 1. Sustaining Community Resources The HWR program makes use of existing buildings and the community's infrastructure. The community's infrastructure is a major selling point to the buyer, and in return, the new family provides value and benefits with respect to the following: • Community's growth, • Delivery of services, • Increasing the labor pool available to local businesses, • Reducing freeway congestion given the opportunity workers can live near their work, • Adding younger households to the community where the population is often aging and • Providing the mechanism to invest in affordable housing 2. Expanding Homeownership Opportunities: HWR three principal features of the program continue to appeal to the targeted market, which includes the cost of homes, the quality of home and their location. Additionally, owning a CLT home is a starting point on the homeownership ladder for many of HWR homeowners. A 2010 study 1 found that nearly 80% of Land Trust homeowners go on to purchase market -rate homes. Furthermore, future work -force families will benefit because the home's re- purchase price will be permanently affordable through the Land Trust as affordable homeownership. Therefore, providing a long -term practice for families to become homeowners, adds value to the community, stabilizes families and protects the investment of the subsidy by all funding sources when using the Community Land Trust practice. 3, Supporting Residential Stability: The HWR program provides assistance to neighborhoods in maintaining the neighborhood as it ages enabling newcomers and families to join the community and revitalize the housing inventory and support the investment in the delivery of the Community's infrastructure. 4, Preserving Housing Affordability: Community Land Trust homes remain affordable between consecutive generations of homeowners. The resale restriction is the subsidy retention and is tied to the home not the owner. This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low -to- moderate income families over a long period. ' Urban Institute, Shared Equity Homeownership Evaluation: Case Study of Northern Communities Land Trust, April 2010 draft (This evaluation is part of a larger study still in progress of CLTs, limited equity co- ops and deed restriction programs) Exhibit 3 2015 Edina CDBG Application Homes within Reach- Community Land Trust - How it Works West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust dba Homes Within Reach is a Community Land Trust. A Community Land Trust organization is a - • Nonprofit organization • Formed to hold title to land to preserve its long -term affordability • Receives public and private donations of land or monies, to purchase land on which housing exists or can be built • The homes are sold to low -to- moderate income workforce families • The CLT retains ownership of the land and provides a long -term ground lease to homebuyers to secure their rights to use the land • The CLT retains a long -term option to re- purchase the homes at a formula- driven purchase price when homeowners later decide to sell & move. Two key components driving the interest in Community Land Trusts are • A Social Component: Promoting homeownership for low to moderate income families • A Financial Component: Protecting the public's investment in affordable homeownership The Community Land Trust (CLT) is one vehicle that allows homeownership to be affordable for low -to- moderate income workforce families. A Community Land Trust (CLT) establishes affordability by removing the value of the land from the mortgage equation to create initial affordability resulting in savings of principal and interest and in down payment and closing costs. The CLT retains ownership of the land and enters into a 99 -year ground lease with the leaseholder- homeowner. Therefore, each affordable home will offer affordable homeownership to 6 -9 families throughout the life of the lease. The CLT leaseholder- homeowner pays property tax on both the home and the land, and secures the rights to use the land via a Ground Lease. Federal, State, City and private contributions fund project costs - land acquisition, buyer assistance, rehab, and holding costs. A CLT ensures permanent affordability of the home through two provisions found in the Ground Lease. 0 The first is a pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity (25 %- 35%), while ensuring the sale price for subsequent low -to- moderate income households is affordable. Z The second provision requires the homeowner to sell either to another low -to- moderate income household. In addition, the provisions ensure the home continues to be affordable with each sale. A CLT leaseholder- homeowner receives benefits similar to non -CLT homeowners such as the ability to build equity, the federal mortgage interest and property tax deduction and the ability to pass on the lease interest and home to their heirs. The following Chart provides an example of how a Community Land Trust creates initial and permanent affordability (99 years plus). The example compares the difference in affordability after ten years under the CLT and conventional model. Page 1 of 2 Exhibit 3 2015 Edina CDBG Application Affordability Comparison Affordability Comparison CLT Model Conventional Model Acquisition costs Market Value Land $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Market Value Home $ 120,000 $ 120,000 Total $ 210,000 $ 210,000 Subsidy Subsidy /Affordability Gap $ 90,000 $ - Sale Price $ 120,000 $ 210,000 Housing Costs Principal and Interest 1 $ 719 $ 1,200 Property Taxes $ 235 $ 235 Homeowner Insurance $ 135 $ 135 Land Lease Fee $ 30 n/a Total Monthly Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance $ 1,119 $ 1,570 Down Payment $ 1,000 $ 10,500 Closing Costs $ 4,150 $ 5,650 Market Value After 10 Years Market Value Home $ 161,270 n/a Market Value Land and Home n/a $ 282,222 Increase in Value Z $ 41,270 $ 72,222 Sale Price Calculation after 10 Years Percentage of Appreciation to Owner 35% 100% Owners Share of Appreciation $ 14,445 $ 72,222 New Sale Price of Home $ 134,445 $ 282,222 1 Mortgage Interest Rate 6 %, Term 30 years, Z Annual average increase in market value 3% The chart above demonstrates that after ten years, the CLT home sells for $134,445 as opposed to $282,222 under the conventional model, a difference of $147,777. There are two primary factors to account for this difference. First, the land has been permanently removed from the speculative market. Secondly, the homeowner receives only a percentage of the appreciation of the home when they decide to sell. In the above example, the owner receives 35% or $14,445, based on a formula that is standard among CL-Ts (25 -35 %) across the United States, where the homeowner receives only a portion of the appreciation in order to make the home affordable for each subsequent sale. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit 4 2015 Edina CDBG Application Equity Resale Provisions The home purchased by HWR applicants in Edina using the land trust practice will be part of the resale- restricted �vae domain of WHAHLT - HWR and will remain affordable for low- moderate income households, through one resale after ,within another, and continue to serve homebuyers without the need of additional subsidies, regardless the number of times t ■�vMr►■ ■ the home sells (99 -198 years). 1 The Ground lease (executed between WHAHLT -HWR and the homeowner) protects the assets of the land by providing the land trust certain rights to safeguard the condition and affordability of the home. HWR homes cost less than market rate homes because HWR homebuyers purchase only the house and enter into an agreement with WHAHLT- HWR for the use of the land. By taking the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, land trust homes are more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. Given that WHAHLT -HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and WHAHLT -HWR sign a long -term legal document called a Ground Lease, which defines the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT -HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long -term rights to the land. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to a qualified buyer or WHAHLT -HWR. The resale price is limited by a formula which more then likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down payment as well as the entire principal paid to that point in time). In addition, to a percentage (35% for WHAHLT) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Please see the attached - How the Community Land Trust Model Works - Exhibit 2. h Ceq 18813 \ ��9• lAAB To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No 2015 -25; Amending Chapters 10 & 32, regarding tree preservation and subdivisions. Action Requested: Second reading of the attached Ordinance No. 2015 -25. Information / Background: The attached Ordinance includes the changes recommended by the City Council at first reading. The new text has been highlighted in light blue. The following is a summary of the proposed Ordinance: ➢ This ordinance applies to: demolition permits; subdivisions applications; building permit applications for principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and additions to principal and accessory structures. ➢ All such permits are required to include a tree inventory plan indicating where Protected Trees are located and, their species, caliper, and health. The plan must show how Protected Trees are preserved and protected during construction. The plan must also show if any Protected Trees are proposed to be removed and the location, species and size of all replacement tree(s). ➢ Trees to be protected under this Ordinance include all deciduous trees at least 8 inches dbh, except box elder, poplar, willow, silver maple, black locust, fruit tree, and mulberry; and coniferous trees at least 20 feet in height. ➢ Any healthy protected tree that is removed within a 10 foot radius of a building pad, deck or patio or within 5 feet of a driveway and parking area does not have to be replaced. ➢ Any healthy protected tree that is removed within areas of installation of public infrastructure improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and utilities does not have to be replaced. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION r Any healthy protected tree that is removed as part of a demolition permit; building permit application for a structural addition; or building permits for accessory structure that is outside of the building pad, deck or patio area, public infrastructure or utility area, or within the driveway or parking area must be replaced I to 1. ➢ Protected Trees to remain must be protected during construction. ➢ Replacement trees that die within three years of planting would need to be replaced. The subdivision ordinance has been revised to reflect the new ordinance. The proposed Ordinance would add an expense to a building permit for inclusion of the tree inventory. The Ordinance would also require a longer building permit review time and additional staff time. Ordinance Enforcement While the proposed ordinance would not have the impact on staffing that the previous ordinance did, the amount of staff time required to enforce this ordinance will still increase. As mentioned previously, the city forester is currently a part time position (34 hours per week on average). The forester has reviewed the proposed Ordinance, and believes that an additional staff person (possibly part time) would be required to adequately enforce the Ordinance or the city forester position become full time to still maintain the level of service that they currently provide. The primary focus of the forester is on the city's 600 -800 acres of public land; although he does occasionally work with residents regarding tree issues on private property. The new ordinance would require the following additional staff review: • Review of the "tree plan" as part of the building permit. This is the review of the survey showing existing trees, those that would be removed, and those proposed to be planted. Given the last couple years of permit activity, this could be between 150 -200 permits per year; this would include new home construction after a tear down and additions to existing homes. Inspect the property at the time of the final inspection for the building permit to ensure that the tree plan has been followed. • Respond to complaints regarding trees that die during the three year new growth period. This would ultimately be a decision of the City Council in regard to staffing. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance 2015 -25 Page 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING TREE PRESERVATION & SUBDIVISIONS The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 10, Article III of the Edina City Code is amended to add Division 3 as follows: DIVISION III. TREE PROTECTION Sec. 10 -82. Preservation, protection and replacement of Protected Trees: This Division applies to: demolition permits; subdivisions applications; building permit applications for principal and accessory structures including a garage, deck or a pool; and additions to principal and accessory structures. (1) Purpose: Edina is fortunate to have a robust inventory of mature trees that form an integral part of the unique character and history of the city, and that contribute to the long -term aesthetic, environmental, and economic well - -being of the city. The goal of this Section is to preserve Edina's high valued trees, while allowing reasonable development to take place and not interfere with how existing property owners use their property. The purpose of the ordinance is to: Preserve and grow Edina's tree canopy cover by protecting mature trees throughout the city. Protect and enhance property values by conserving and adding to the distinctive and unique aesthetic character of Edina's tree population. C. Protect and enhance the distinctive character of Edina's neighborhoods d. Improve the quality of life for all stakeholders, including city residents, visitors and wildlife. e. Protect the environment by the filtering of air and soil pollutants, increasing oxygen levels and reducing CO2; preventing and reducing erosion and stormwater by stabilizing soils; reducing heat convection; decreasing wind speeds; reducing noise pollution and decreasing the urban heat island effect. f. Protect and maintain healthy trees in the development and building permit processes as set forth herein; and prevent tree loss by eliminating or reducing compacted fill and excavation near tree roots. (2) Definitions: Protected Tree: Any tree that is structurally sound and healthy, and that meets one of the following: Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — ;J %) Added text after October 21 - XXXX a deciduous tree that is at least ,8 inches dbh, except box elders, poplar, willow, ,silver maple, black locust, fruit tree species, and mulberry. ii. a coniferous tree that is at least 20 feet in height. Removable Tree. Any tree not defined as a Protected Tree, and as defined as an invasive species by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. C. Critical Root Zone. The minimum area around -a tree that is left undisturbed. The critical root radius is calculated by measuring the t'ree's diameter at breast height. For, each inch of tree diameter, 1.5 feet of root zone radius must be protected. For example, if a tree's dbh is 10 inches, then its critical root zone radius is 1.5 feet (10 x 1.5 = 15). If the critical root zone must be disturbed for construction or construction activity, a plan for the disturbance shall be submitted subject to review and approval of the city forester to minimize the damage. d. Diameter at Breast Height (dbh). The dbh shall be measured at a height of 4.6 feet. Transplanted Tree. A protected tree which is removed from a lot and replanted to another private lot or a public space in Edina. (3) Applications must include a tree inventory plan indicating where Protected Trees are located and, their species, caliper, and health. The plan must show how Protected Trees are preserved and protected during construction. The plan must also show if any Protected Trees are proposed to be removed and the location, species and size of all replacement tree(s). (4) If a Protected Tree is removed, except as allowed for in paragraph (5), it must be replaced with one (1) tree, subject to the following conditions: a. Protected trees must be replaced with species of a similar type (deciduous or coniferous) that are normally found growing in similar conditions and that are included on the list of acceptable replacement species on file with the city forester. Replacement trees must be varied by species. Replacement trees must not be subject to known epidemic diseases or infestations. Disease or infestation resistant species and cultivars are allowed. Replacement trees must be at least two and one -half inches (2.5 ") in caliper for deciduous trees and a minimum of seven feet (7') tall for coniferous trees. Replacement tree plans are subject to approval by the City Forester before implementation. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — Added text after Octber 21- XXXX 2 The tree inventory plan shall be verified at the time of final inspection for the building permit. g. If the city determines that there is no appropriate location for some or all the required replacement trees, those trees will not be required on site. Th�. shall require the replacement trees on public property if there is no appropriate location on site. (5) Protected Trees rn- removed without mitigation, in the following areas: a. Including, and within a ten -foot (10') radius of the building pad, deck or patio of a new or remodeled building. b. Including, and within a five - -foot (5') radius of driveways and parking areas. Including, and within ten -foot (10') radius of installation of public infrastructure improvements including public roadways, stormwater retention areas and utilities. (6) Before construction, grading or land clearing begins; city- approved tree protection fencing or other method must be installed and maintained at the critical root zones of the trees to be protected. The location of the fencing must be in conformance with the approved tree preservation plan. The fencing must be inspected by city staff before site work begins. The fencing must remain in place until all demolition and construction is complete. (7) No construction, compaction, construction access, stock piling of earth, storage of equipment or building materials, or grading may occur within the critical root zone areas of trees to be protected, unless there are no other on -site alternatives. If there are no other alternatives, a plan for this activity would need to be reviewed and approved by the city forester. A reasonable effort must be made when trenching utility lines to avoid the critical root zone.. (8) When construction is complete all trees to remain must have the soil out to their drip line aerated and de- compacted. Aerating must include multiple concentric circles of 1" holes, 2" deep, or as recommended by an arborist. (9) If Protected Trees were removed within one (1) year prior to the date the development, subdivision application, demolition and building permit applications were submitted, these Protected Trees are also subject to the replacement policy set forth in paragraph (4) above. (10)Any transplanted tree shall riot be counted as a protected tree that is removed t►nder this section and shall not count as a tree that requires replacement under his section. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — ;,X; >; Added text after Octber 21 - Section 2. Chapter 32. Article III. Evaluation of Plats and Subdivisions is hereby revised as follows: Subsection 32 -7. (Subdivisions.) Variances are hereby amended as follows: Sec. 32 -7. Variances. (a) Grant by Council. In connection with the preliminary or final approval of a plat or subdivision the Council may grant variances from the provisions of this Section. The Council shall grant variances only upon finding that an unusual hardship exists as to the land within the plat or subdivision, and specifically that: (1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant reasonable use of their land. (2) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which property is situated. (3) That the variance is to correct inequities resulting from an extreme physical hardship including topography, or inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. A grant of a variance by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the variance grounds set out above even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. (b) Conditions. In granting a variance the Council may impose conditions to ensure compliance with the purpose and objectives of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code and to protect adjacent properties. The conditions may be made a part of any Development Contract required by article IV of this chapter. Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — >. Added text after Octber 21- Section 3. Chapter 32. Article III. Evaluation of Plats and Subdivisions is hereby revised as follows: Sec. 32 -130. Considerations. (2) The impact of the pFopesed plat OF subdivisioR, and proposed development, en the enyirenmeRt, including but not I mited to, —tepQg steep slopes, —yegetatien- naturally oceuFriRg lakes, peRds and stFeams, susceptibility of the site to eFesien and sedimeRtation, suseeptibility of the site to flooding and wateF stoFage needs OR and f.- •,,rrom the sate. ...... . ..... rarr. ZY. .. M. �RUWMMNM (4) The compliance the the development yAth the policies, of proposed plat er subdivision, and prepesed 36 including, objectives, geals and requirements of chapter without limit-aflen, the lot size --d the fleedplaiR everlay distFiet provisions of chapter Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — : � X Added text after Octber 21- -1) Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility to flooding, use as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of 18 percent or more, are such that the property is not suitable for the type of development or use proposed. (-I ) Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more than 25 percent of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 percent. (3) Comply with Section 10 -82. Section 4. Chapter 36. Article VIII. Districts and District Regulations is hereby revised to add the following: Sec. 36 -437. Requirements for lot areas and dimensions. (5) Variances from Section 36 -437. When Variances are requested from Section 36- 437, requirements for lot areas and dimensions, the Planning Commission and City Council may consider the following criteria in addition to Section 36 -98: a. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, on the 'character and symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by, but not limited to, the following matters: i. The suitability of the size and shape of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision relative to the size and scrape of lots in the neighborhood; and ii. The compatibility of the size, shape, location and arrangement of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed density and intended use of the site and the density and use of lots in the neighborhood. b. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, on the environment, including but riot limited to, topography, steep slopes; vegetation, naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, susceptibility of the Existing text — XXXX 6 Stricken text - --XXXX Added text — Added text after Octber 21- XXXX site to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility of the site to flooding and water storage needs on and from the site c. The consistency of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, and compliance by the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development, with the policies, objectives, and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. d. The compliance of the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development with the policies, objectives, goals and requirements of chapter 36 including, without limitation, the lot size and the floodplain overlay district provisions of chapter 36. r , The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development on health, safety and general welfare of the public. f. The relationship of the design of the site, or the improvements proposed and the conflict of such design or improvements, with any easements of record or on the ground. g. The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or subdivision to existing streets and the adequacy and safety of ingress to and egress from such lots from and to existing'' streets. h. The adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the conformity with existing and planned streets and highways in surrounding areas. Streets in the proposed plat or subdivision shall be deemed inadequate if designed or located so as to prevent or deny public street access to adjoining properties, it being the policy of the City to avoid landlocked tracts, parcels or lots. The suitability of street grades in relation to the grades of lots and existing or future extension of the City's water, storm and sanitary sewer systems. j,. The adequacy and availability of access by police, fire, ambulance and other life safety vehicles to all proposed improvements to be developed on the proposed plat or subdivision. k. Whether the proposed plat or subdivision, or the improvements proposed to be placed thereon are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — `,:X };K Added text after Octber 21- XXX�X 7 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 12015. City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Added text after Octber 21- XXXX ]BOB To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIILB From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -21, Lot Division with Variances at 3621 and 3625 54th Street for Donnay Homes. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Lot Division and Variances. Information I Background: (60 day deadline: February 24, 2015) Donnay Homes are proposing to tear down the existing double dwelling unit at 3621 and 3625 54th Street West, and build a new one. (See property location on pages AI —A3 of the Planning Commission Staff Report.) To accommodate the request, the following is requested: ➢ A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54th Street; ➢ A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to build the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and ➢ A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4—A 12.) Within this area there are a mixture of duplexes and single - family homes, zoned R- I, Single - Family Residential and R -2, Double- Dwelling Unit. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Commission Recommendation: On January 28, 2015, 2014 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan: Vote: 8 Ayes, 0 Nays. (See attached Planning Commission minutes.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Lot Division and Variances, per the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2015 -21 • Planning Commission Staff Report, January 28, 2015 • Planning Commission Minutes, January 28, 2015 Page 2 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-21 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION WITH VARIANCES AT 3621 AND 3625 54TH STREET WEST BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Donnay Homes are proposing to split their existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separation of a new double - dwelling at 3621 and 3625 54th Street West. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, IVANDALE PARK, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.03 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lot 6, Block 2, IVANDALE PARK, Hennepin County Minnesota; AND Lot 7, Block 2, IVANDALE PARK, Hennepin County Minnesota. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: ➢ A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54th Street; ➢ A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to build the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and ➢ A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. 1.05 On January 28, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the lot division on a Vote of 8 -0. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 . Fax 952 - 826 -0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-21 P a i e. 1 2 The proposed variances for lot area and width are reasonable given that the existing lot is substandard at 10,748 square feet in size and 80 feet in width. There is no change in use of the property. 2. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R -2 zoning district. 3. The character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of both variances. 4. The practical difficulties that limit development of the property are the narrow lot width and substandard lot size. 5. The drainage plan would direct run -off away from adjacent properties, which would be an improvement over existing conditions. 6. The applicant could relocate the garage opening for the garage to 54th Street, and all required setbacks would be met. However, by having the garage face Drew, there would be more building articulation along that side wall, and each side of the home facing the street would appear to be a single family home. These conditions would be more consistent with the neighborhood given the single family homes that exist across the street from each garage door opening. 7. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Lot Division and Variance for 3621 and 3625 54th Street West, subject to the following conditions: 1. The new double dwelling shall be built per the submitted plans date stamped December 24, 2014, and January 9, 2015. 2. The 24 -inch Locust and 22 -inch Locust on the site shall be maintained and protected during construction. 3. The applicant shall plant and additional 4 -inch Maple on each new lot to replace the 12- inch Maple that is to be removed. 4. Each unit shall have separate utility hook -ups. 5. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. 6. The applicant shall maintain the existing shrubs per the proposed landscape plan. RESOLUTION NO. 2015-21 P,ige 13 Adopted this _ day of 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2015. City Clerk AC'S Applicant Presentation Mr. Erickson informed the Commission he spoke with the majority of his neighbors who indicated to him their support for the project, adding with regard to building height that he wasn't aware of any issues with the overall building height. Public Comment Chair Platteter opened public hearing period. Mr. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place addressed the Commission expressing his concern with the variance request if there was an error in building height calculations, adding he believes the new home next to him is be\g constructed too close to the property line due to an error. Chair Platteter asked if any a else would like to eak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Scherer moved to close the c hearing. C issioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. N o Discussion Commissioner Carr stated in her op i the renovations to the home look good and are a plus for the neighborhood. Carr said s supports the variance as requested. Commissioner Lee said she was con 11 Oerned Vth the question raised concerning overall building height, adding without that inform4ton being act she would feel uncomfortable voting on it. Chair Platteter asked Planner T ague if the varia es were approved to ensure that all building heights are calculated correct) Planner Teague sa all calculations would be double checked, reiterating if there is an error it would be very small d could easily be addressed and corrected. Commissioner Forrest s ' in her opinion the request is r asonable, adding she likes the rain garden. She said approv I should be per the plans presente to include double checking the calculation of building ight and retaining the rain garden. Motion Commissioner Carr moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including the conditions 1) that overall building height must comply with code and 2) the rain garden is constructed per plans presented. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Scherer, Schroeder, Olsen, Carr, Forrest, Platteter. Nay, Lee. Motion carried. B. Lot Division and Variance. Donnay Homes. 3621 & 3625 54th Street West, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Donnay Homes are proposing to tear down the existing double dwelling unit at 3621 and 3625 54`h Street West, and build a new one.To accommodate the request Teague reported that the following is requested: . A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54`h Street; 2. A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to built the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and 3. A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. Teague further explained that within this area there are a mixture of duplexes and single - family homes, zoned both R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -2, Double- Dwelling Unit. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the city council approve the variances and lot division as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The new double dwelling shall be built per the submitted plans date stamped December 24, 2014, and January 9, 2015. 2. The 24 -inch Locust and 22 -inch Locust on the site shall be maintained and protected during construction. 3. The applicant shall plant and additional 4 -inch Maple on each new lot to replace the 12 -inch Maple that is to be removed. 4. Each unit shall have separate utility hook -ups. S. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Appearing for the Applicant Steve Beneke, Donnay Homes. Discussion Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if the Engineers had an opinion. Planner Teague responded Engineering believes the project will improve the existing site conditions. Commissioner Lee commented that she observed shrubs to the east and asked if they would remain. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. 4 Applicant Presentation Mr. Beneke said in his opinion the building design and splitting the garages helps the neighborhood both practically and aesthetically. In reference to the landscaping Beneke stated all measures would be taken to retain the existing vegetation (hedge), trim the hedge and implement all staff conditions on landscaping. Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to be cautious with the drainage; pointing out there is some topography change in the area. Continuing, Forrest complimented the design and garage layout of the new structure. Chair Platteter agreed, adding he appreciates the creativity in building design and garage placement. Public Hearin Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Commissioner Carr asked to amend the motion to include maintenance of the existing shrubs. It was observed that the shrubs /hedge was depicted on the landscape plans dated January 9, 2015, noting staff conditions include date stamped plans. All voted aye; motion carried. VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Wooddale Valley View SmALArea f lan Commissioner Lee addressed the Commissi and explained the Wooddale /Valley View Small Area Plan process is entering its final stages. said the hope is that this process could become a template for further small area p , n pr esses. Continuing, Lee delivered a power point resentation nd shared with the Commission the progress of the working group including imeline. Lee s ted it is their hope that in the near future the plan is finalized and posted t he website for p lic comment. Lee explained after the public comment time period is ove the team would meet to review comments and finalize the plan. A, �y • �N�ORraMT� INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Donnay Homes are proposing to tear down the existing double dwelling unit at 3621 and 3625 54th Street West, and build a new one. (See property location on pages Al —A3.) To accommodate the request, the following is requested: A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54th Street; 2. A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to built the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and 3. A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 —Al2.) Within this area there are a mixture of duplexes and single - family homes, zoned both R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -2, Double- Dwelling Unit. (See pages A2 —A3.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: City of Minneapolis; single - family homes. South: Single- family dwellings; zoned and guided for single - family homes. Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 28, 2015 V1. B. Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Donnay Homes are proposing to tear down the existing double dwelling unit at 3621 and 3625 54th Street West, and build a new one. (See property location on pages Al —A3.) To accommodate the request, the following is requested: A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54th Street; 2. A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to built the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and 3. A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 —Al2.) Within this area there are a mixture of duplexes and single - family homes, zoned both R -1, Single - Family Residential and R -2, Double- Dwelling Unit. (See pages A2 —A3.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: City of Minneapolis; single - family homes. South: Single- family dwellings; zoned and guided for single - family homes. East: Double- dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. West: Single- family dwellings; zoned and guided for single - family homes. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a duplex. (See page A2 -A2c.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Variance — Lot Area and Width Low - density attached residential R -2, Double- dwelling unit residential Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. The lot size and width are existing conditions. To deny this variance would deny the property owner reasonable use of the property, which is a lot that allows a double - dwelling unit. The practical difficulty is the existing size of the property, which does not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 15,000 square feet or width of 90 feet. The City has routinely granted variances for existing lot size and width variances for building new double dwellings. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R -2 zoning district, but it is unique. 2 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The use of the site would not change; therefore, the character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of the lot area variance. The height of the new structure would be four (4) feet shorter than what would be allowed on this site. Variance — Side Street Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The lot size and narrow width of the lot are the practical difficulties that limit the size of the building pad for a double dwelling unit. The applicant could relocate the garage opening for the garage to 54th Street, and all required setbacks would be met. However, in doing so, there would be more building articulation along the side wall, as each side of the home facing the street would appear to be a single family home. (See page A9.) This would be more consistent with the neighborhood given the single family homes that exist across the street from each garage door opening. (See pages A2, A3, and A10.) There is a 12 inch Maple that would be removed as a result of the garage opening toward Drew Avenue. (See page A6.) The applicant believes that the architecture of the home is a better trade off than saving the tree, and having a larger blank side wall. The applicant has indicated a willingness to plant an additional 4 inch Maple tree on each new lot to replace the 12- inch Maple; and will be saving the 22 -inch Locust to the south, and the 24- inch Locust just south of the 3625 side of the building. (See landscape plan page A10b.) 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The small size and narrow width of the existing property is not uncommon in the R -2 zoning district, but it is unique. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The use of the site would not change; therefore, the character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of the lot area variance. The height of the new structure would be four (4) feet shorter than what would be allowed on this site. Compliance Table * Variance Required Primary Issue • Are the proposed variances and lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed variances for lot area and width are reasonable given that the existing lot is substandard at 10,748 square feet in size and 80 feet in width. There is no change in use of the property. 2. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R -2 zoning district. 4 City Standard Proposed Front (54t) 36.08 feet 36.90 feet Side Street (Drew) 20 feet garage facing street *18 feet 15 feet with side facing street NA Side 10 feet 11.3 feet Rear- 35 feet 46 feet Building Height 2 1/2 stories, 35 feet 2 stories, 31 feet Lot Area 15,000 s.f. *10,748 s. f. Lot Width 90 feet *80 feet Lot coverage 25% 24.5% * Variance Required Primary Issue • Are the proposed variances and lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed variances for lot area and width are reasonable given that the existing lot is substandard at 10,748 square feet in size and 80 feet in width. There is no change in use of the property. 2. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R -2 zoning district. 4 3. The character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of both variances. 4. The practical difficulties that limit development of the property are the narrow lot width and substandard lot size. 5. The drainage plan would direct run -off away from adjacent properties, which would be an improvement over existing conditions. (See the engineering department's review on page A13.) 6. The applicant could relocate the garage opening for the garage to 54th Street, and all required setbacks would be met. However, by having the garage face Drew, there would be more building articulation along that side wall, and each side of the home facing the street would appear to be a single family home. (See page A10.) These conditions would be more consistent with the neighborhood given the single family homes that exist across the street from each garage door opening. 7. The applicant has indicated a willingness to plant an additional 4 -inch Maple tree on each new lot to replace the 12 -inch Maple, and will be saving the 24 -inch Maple to the south, and the 24 -inch Locust just south of the 3625 side of the building. (See page A1 0b.) These two newly planted trees would not be required in the new tree ordinance that was just recommended by the Planning Commission, as it is located in the proposed driveway area. The existing shrubs along the east and north lot lines would remain, but be trimmed. 8. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council approve the variances and lot division as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The new double dwelling shall be built per the submitted plans date stamped December 24, 2014, and January 9, 2015. 2. The 24 -inch Locust and 22 -inch Locust on the site shall be maintained and protected during construction. 3. The applicant shall plant and additional 4 -inch Maple on each new lot to replace the 12 -inch Maple that is to be removed. 5 4. Each unit shall have separate utility hook -ups. 5. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Deadline for a city decision: February 24, 2015 6 5217 I v� _raj _ ._ — .101 5221 J r 5225 T 5229 } ( 4 -- 5241 5249 5232 24 { - Z - - -- " - -_�, O r -4 - _ - -(a: _ _ _ 5241 (' _! ;;;' -. -( fi— I ( — m - I" - i 5300 5305 - — 5310 - - --- 5369 i. _ r " ;5310 ___ . - _ i' 5313 -- 1 5317 5321 - I •- �_ i ,, 5325 53 - -- 5330 - - —I 5333 f 5354 _� 5349 5337 5353 tV 5357 5352 r -- - °— 5353 { — - 201 5401 1 -. - - 54C +0 5461; ! I - j v < 540 5 5402 imoj -�4G . ii 5412 i t 5404 -:5405 541324 t 5409+ �� w. - 3225 �y 5421 5410: 6 m t.24 — 540 ._ 5416 5417 -__ _.. .. 2 5420 5421 t FULLER STREET - I "> 5428 5429 I 5425 - - ---- 5425 5432 _ 5437 5436 ! - i lI_ Y11 tissoi 544u =r 5441 5440 ? ) _: 24 �. 55TH 5TREET 111EST 59DO x 5rg-,1 5540 -. ._ _ , `_ , 3809 - 24 f 5564 n� 551; 5508 551 i4 3505 24 r.I 5�8 5517 _ -- i , � 551D5 r� _. fi i 5s il / 5520 5521 5522 � - .. _ —l. 24 I 24 I) 5515 d 5'� - s! 5521 5504 { 7C• 68 66 53'51 ;f 24 550855TH STREET WEST I 'C5a27 — - - -- 59 =1 5512 i 72 ti• 5605 74 65 62 57 0 4 `�i 5520 j Parcel 20- 028 -24 -22 -0028 A -T_B: Map Scale: V = 400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 1/22/2015 Owner Paul J Donnay Three Llc Market Name: Total: Parcel 3621 54Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55410 Total: Property Sale Residential -Two Unit Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- representation or warranty expressed or Stead: Non - Homestead implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.25 acres Area: 10,698 sq ft COPYRIGHT ©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Ttrthk!Green! ki m �i WV 1 r y?(i• 1i�..r. a Y 1 •41`Ri. °' zy • � 4 �r i'. v •�V}��t- I IP • �'i [,. s 4 d ; y • , � I,f �,(�f y� , , '�& •� °� yew' �'�" _ � ,• t >E' 1 ��.�°� •u =Sw.� ®iIDB_e l :.. ''rte j1 ' c cu A: P A h r J, '_ Vt4H`,�i"X` r p`O ��+ ✓s ,3 ��'�a'i�i'Yky° i �� �. " -� � r -y��`F '�ir ._,./.. Vs WO YTy' av�,/yV)rw (�,,4'yBi /'fr�i¢e1bO� c 'r Am iCa ��. `' , ',.e.•• �/ / �A� V ik is -;- OF P s' 6 t a� J Z4 g r Mc I WR IL ZoNIM(, , Legend R-1 Single Dwelling Unit Dist R-2 Double dwelling Unit Dist, PRD-1 Planned Residence Dist. PRD-2 PRD-3 PRDA PRD-5 PCD-1 Planned Commercial Dist PCD-2 PCD-3 PCDA POD-1 Planned Office Dist. POD-2 RNID Regional Medical Dist. PID Planned Industrial Dist. PUD Planned Unit Dist APD Automobile Parking Dist. EHLD Edina Heritage Landmark Dist. PSR-4 Planned Seni;,or Citizen Dist MDDA 1.1ixed Development Dist MDD-5 MDD-6 • Church City Buildings Private School L Public School catow—==4 Ivi 64TH & FRANCE DETAIL W"THST kl ST 0 VALLEY VIEW & WOODDALE DE W > .j M.. ........ ... .... . .. ... 4Pf6qVt lvilolw( 1. Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable - Lot is legal, non - conforming. The choice to'split'the garage doors to the front and side of the building allows for a less 'Garage-focused' set of Elevations. Garage Setback to Drew Ave lot line is 18'8 ", which is a deviation of 1'4" from the required 20' and allows for a reasonable depth of Garage in this configuration. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district— the Zoning Code established the current minimum standards after this lot was created; lot is legal, non - conforming, but is smaller than current requirements. The deviation for the garage setback for 3621— W 54th Ave. still allows for off- street parking for this lot. 3. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance — Approval allows continued use of the legal non - conforming lot within the current Zoning. The deviation for the garage setback does not detract from the intent of providing for off - street parking. The recessing of the garage door area adds relief to the new building 4. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood — Approval continues the existing 'duplex' - style use, maintains the existing density, but allows for additional open and enclosed off - street parking for the residents. 4 NG CONDITIONS AS -BUILT SURVEY PROJECT NO. 15503.00 PREPARED FOR: DONNAY HOMES 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION (000.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION -+L- INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE esl.os = FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION e9z.s7 = FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 891.0 DENOTES ASBUILT ELEVATION ADDRESS: 3621 54TH ST WEST BENCHMARK: TNH NW QUADRANT OF 54TH ST WEST AND LANE AVENUE. ELEV.= 893.18 LOT AREA: 1 0,748 5Q. FT EXISTING HOUSE AREA : I ,518 5Q. FT PORCH AREA: G7 5Q, FT EXISTING GARAGE AREA: 585 5Q. FT EXI5TING DRIVEWAY AREA : 550 SQ. FT SCALE : 1" = 20' Legal Description: LOTS 6 & 7, BLOCK 2 IVANDALE PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 'a/ ROBE PLANNERS and LAND ENGINEERING COMPRNY, INC. 1000 EAST 146th ST., STE. 24D, BURNSMI.E, MN 55; REVISED 01- 20 -15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and described hereon. As prepared by me this 15TH ay of UL �ZO1AL w tt F0 1P /' Minn. Reg. No. 19086 RUSSELL P. DAMLO !\ Ix a ° m 16 m 106 n a W Z 1 � 19.18 4PL 12' X891.2 � 080,6 801.3,; CONK WALK 890.5 691.3 �g 0- LOCUST 2 p 891,0 m M`M c 801.3 N N 19.5E mm 801.0 m CXISTI HOU5 m I5T FUR I5T FLR 892.87 72.8G m m 19.58 891.1 B0 k.0 242 B1. N9 GFLR 891.09 GARAGE a LOCUST 24' 880.8 89t.1 36.6J/ ,/ 890.0 11011 I5T PLR 891.18 EXI5TING HOUSE Jm 880.2 11.83 BB8.4 g2� M r � '02 CO MLLO r O Z B1TUMOU9 DRIVE 880.4 x 8B8. L." �467 0 FD IPet 7 888.8 Q DD 80.48 MEAS. 1 S89n43'05 "W N GARAGE 4.14 < FD IP 888.0 7.7 'O VINYL FENCE 889.0@ x� \ 1886.82 800.22 BBB.80 BB0.71 e9o.ee I I _ 891.06 i UH O 8889.43 54TH STIREET WE5T _ x086.74 890.63 890.94 001.23 9 891.14 890.32 ® BAN11H 888.06 808.75 I C)�R 885.83 685.71 880.26 I B90.45 rC o,G Pr TC GRE' N89 56'21 "E TC GREEN FLAG 806.63 s9D.o9 �\ sE,v ?9.¢0 MEAS. m 80.00-flLAT Ory1 BBB. 0 / 668.9 BBB.@ 888.0 @BBB •� eB6.0 886.7 m " _ I m / _ ? \\ m 511RU3 5HRUB5 ! !! 890.2 LOT" % "'Beg.@ 80.6 � `, LOT 6 666.6 a 11 / D Ul 90.8 o o �• m _ BBB.@ x `\ 890.8 \ 5 o 1 G x890.9 m BBB. ^ m 880.8 69 .0 891.0 j I BB1.3 *T � �WALIC n c8 801.0 ` nnn c REVISED 01- 20 -15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and described hereon. As prepared by me this 15TH ay of UL �ZO1AL w tt F0 1P /' Minn. Reg. No. 19086 RUSSELL P. DAMLO !\ Ix a ° m 16 m 106 n a W Z 1 � 19.18 4PL 12' X891.2 � 080,6 801.3,; CONK WALK 890.5 691.3 �g 0- LOCUST 2 p 891,0 m M`M c 801.3 N N 19.5E mm 801.0 m CXISTI HOU5 m I5T FUR I5T FLR 892.87 72.8G m m 19.58 891.1 B0 k.0 242 B1. N9 GFLR 891.09 GARAGE a LOCUST 24' 880.8 89t.1 36.6J/ ,/ 890.0 11011 I5T PLR 891.18 EXI5TING HOUSE Jm 880.2 11.83 BB8.4 g2� M r � '02 CO MLLO r O Z B1TUMOU9 DRIVE 880.4 x 8B8. L." �467 0 FD IPet 7 888.8 Q DD 80.48 MEAS. 1 S89n43'05 "W N GARAGE 4.14 < FD IP 888.0 7.7 'O VINYL FENCE PROJECT NO. 15503.00 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PREPARED FOR: SITE PLAN DONNAY HOMES 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION (891.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION �— INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE 891.34 = FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION (691.67) = TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION 888.69 = BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION (892.46) = MAIN ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION (89200) = LOWEST POINT OF ENTRY REAR WINDOWS 892.67 = ORIGINAL HOUSE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION AREAS LOT 1: ADDRESS 3621 54TH STREET WEST LOT AREA: 5,742 5Q, FT HOU5E AREA: 1,295 5Q. FT PORCH AREA: G8 5Q. FT DECK AREA; 120 5Q. FT (NA) FRONT SIDEWALK AREA : 46 5Q. FT (NA) DRIVEWAY AREA : 282 5Q. FT (NA) IMPERVIOUS AREA : I ,3G3 5Q. FT (23.7%x) NOTE: PORCH ON LOT 1 HAS 44.4 SO. FT. ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACK, AREAS LOT 2: ADDRESS 3625 54TH STREET WEST LOT AREA: 5,000 50. PT HOU5E AREA: 1,190 50. FT PORCH AREA; 54 5Q. FT COVERED 5TOOP AREA 1 30 5Q. FT DECK AREA : 120 5Q. FT (NA) FRONT 51DEWALK,AREA: 44 50. FT (NA) DRIVEWAY AREA : 620 50. IT (NA) IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,274 5Q. FT (25.4%x) BENCHMARK: TNH NW QUADRANT OF 54TH ST WEST AND LANE AVENUE ELEV.= 893.18 SCALE : 1" = 20' Legal Description; LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK 1, DONNAY'S DREW ADDITION, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOT RECORD PLAT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, R ®(;¢ PLANNERS and LAND SURVEYOS' R ENGINEERING COMPRNY, INC. 1000 EAST 146th ST., STE 240, BURNStALLE, MN 55337 PH (952)432-3000 F t G— 0 s� i � x x 54TH115TREET WE-5'T REVISED 01- 20 -15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. REVISED 12- 24-14: ADD DECKS, REVISE PORCH ON LOT 1, REVISE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS, REVISE PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOTE, AND REVISED LOT NUMBERS. X1386.74 1 L(1 T '. EXISTING HOUSE I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and described hereon. As prepared by me this 12TH ay of CEP ER,�„�01� Minn. Reg. No. 19086 RUSSELL P. DAMLO i PROJECT NO. 15503.00 PREPARED FOR: DONNAY HOMES )N CONTROL PLAN, - - � 54Tf115TREET WEST I x886.74 s �`Pk�posedead stbllndudmgtemporary 90.84 1 1 i i i i b but in no case later than 14 days after �~r ENTRA E ro ' '$i $ t onstructron activity m that portion of the site has 8B , 0 801.14 I d r -r' I I t temporarily or permanently ceased. 5tabilae with (891-34) ze FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 891.67 =TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION 9AN101 B BBg.86 B BB.76 C CIJ12B (886.88) (#.L. 886.43 886.71 p temporary seed and s[raw much applied at 2 tons 880.46 TC ORG T T 9e1tV � per acres. 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION (as1.o) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION N89 °56'21 "E ` \ -� CONS% UCTIQN fir,; shown on the plan and around any stockpiles. 5dt Fence shall be ms ted and maintained weekly �" �~r ENTRA E (and.thind final aO.5•ddlmap)f rf- INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE 8B , 0 as ees.B , -7 -9 O MEAS ;; ) '- !% 886.7 ihrs In lot seeding and mWchmg (or wddmg)af lot. (891-34) ze FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 891.67 =TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION ml I 12 /(990.3) X 80.0 F.EcAT 42.30 888.0 ' o SILT FENCE ..r � „ (g@ /' a (r'�/, t 37.30 3. A rock, canstruction'entrance shalt be installed and maintained at the location shown on the plan. e88.65 = BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION s9o.2 xB89.9 L._._690_' -' 8.91' .). 4. Contractor or Permitee shall prowde and maintain Inlet on all storm drain .lets (892 �) = MAIN ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION'. r I 800.6 x q `. ; Q ai " ?;Sq / )' 88 x \ I - � protection that .11 receive sediment laden How a, a result of Inlet and mammeance (892.00) = LOWEST POINT OF ENTRY REAR WINDOWS B92.a7 = ORIGINAL HOUSE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION I o 10 I a.. Z '' (d . � �I to rd construction. protection shall remain in place until all source, with t t for dscharge Into the Inlet have been stab �d.a' � nlet may remo ed From a particular AREAS LOT 1: ADDRESS 3621 54TH STREET WEST Y xBgo.9 r jI� B91� ._ � \ m of N i m �n � w if. specific safety Tidal. Met IF e s e F T t (such t ibodm ) has been Identrhed.eThe p<rnukee must receive 6 I -•-' \ it %, a City f rdma written cthrE LOT AREA : 5,742 50. FT ROCK f _esz .� �gl. jj 888.5 ~ 1 f 6 need for removal conduct a casual Inspection to determine which HOU5E AREA : 1,295 5Q. FT o CONST. 891.0 � � ( I( ) (fl91_gy� 891.0 1 X88 g inlets need protection. (I,Jet dowses must be PORCH AREA : 68 50. FT W ENTRANCE BB3.6 50 g 75.50 02 b - 13.1 zo.oD 12.13 removed betws- Oct. 20th and Oct. 31 It. s must be rcinsblled by Mar. 5th weather DECK AREA : 120 5Q. FT (NA) w a ( I S tb p� FRONT 51DEWALK AREA: 46 5Q. FT (NA) nel \yFWAY ARIA: PAP SCJ_ FT (NA) m rye i a " "- y�".til _ t 4 %� chi• ._..- --'-"" 6.0 p tt•9 I �o°f EXISTING S.IFdown gradient sediment practices am NOTE: PORCH ON LOT 1 HAS 44.4 SQ. FT. ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACK. X of A e°a GARAGE GARAGE d HOU5E overloaded, additional up gradunt erosion control � ) 12. I practices will be Installed to reduce loading. a 6.00 1 `w)`•" '- 1 I I I ^7 m$ G. Dust control is the responsibility of the permt holder. The permit holder must dnimate dust 11.68 5.0 1.00 R=--- - J ai �B'2 problems upon mcemng notice from the holding 8$ x BBO. ' I� L_ - - - a\ - oa I to 11.83 88&4 OHical that them is a dust problem. O 8 Cl) Q 7. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSNED D15TMCF. AREAS LOT 2: ADDRESS 3625 54TH STREET WEST I 0 1 50 PR0,P05ED I ~ (952) 641.4532 tdcusr 22• PROPOSED F g W LOT AREA 5,0065Q.FT w o Bin° HOU5E H USE I d 8. 5treetcleamjshalloccurdaffyorasneeded. HOUSE AREA : 1, 190 5Q. FT Z [:23. I "5PUT LMV -5PUT 1CVEl M ° 9. Contact person for site deaiilmes, and PORCH AREA : 54 5Q. FT W M w \\�� x I M Cl) controls. Ch aF the erosro and 19-40 nC COVERED STOOP AREA: 30 SQ. FT °� r w 28 00 26 B0 ' e fr1 r Loo controls. Chad Donnay (G 12) 919 -4095. DECK AREA : 120 50. FT (NA) Q r w 891.0 ' - S 1(891 0)i w Z 10. No concrete washout allowed on into, truck FRONT 51DEWALK AREA: 44 5Q. FT (NA) I 1 801 (891.0) ( )I -• fc 6ECK DECK -4 t tpCUSr 24• I based dxlf con mnment washout devises DRIVEWAY AREA: 620 50. FT (NA) p I 1 $ I -7z.o _ -7z.o I e91. F` 1 ve e IMPERVIOUS AREA: 1,274 SQ. FT (25.4%) I r' ra Chi t skams on city Streets e he cleaned up II r. 1 mth floor dry, aM d spored of as 883.0 4 X88111 • aao.e Isf la Sam hazardous waste materol. a° 880.0 4 %_ 4.39 12. All hazardous waste to be cleaned up and ` ro k6T 1:S v LO 2. disposed of per EPA standards. BENCHMARK: TNH NW QUADRANT OF 54TH ST WEST .-.I t 10 I % I °' 0� 5 AND LANE AVENUE. ELEV. =893.18 '.' r� GARAGE 13�orbom Lary pumESd discharge pollution F< I I 11 entwn leech. SCALE : 1" = 20' Legal Description: LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK DONNAY'S DREW ADDITION, BER 9ED t DANDY OEWATERING BAG -Brock White Co. USA X 9� 88.7 4,14 htlpd /www.brockwhite.coMOp1413346c 13371 8 1.0 880.8 fig.• ~ -- O d- dydewatenng -bags SILT FENC 888.0 .- STORMWATER 8 37 30 • 87 g 887.9 This SWrmwater Management Plan (in narrative form) ,8 W 890 :0 P -p•IP' eau 7 must detail how stormwater mg bs controlled W pnevent ' WOOD - 14,46 -.... gg;7 ........ 88 • 80.00 PLAT BB 8 8 YII1YL PENCE damage to adjacent property and adveree impacts to 088.7 116 aBox the public stormwater draimee system. eee.7 80.48 MEAS. "' \ \ g pUS DRAINPGE f I .Permit holder shall ms ect and maintain 5edimeat and `�nRnE v GARAGE $00'43'05 "W UTIUTr CASEMENT erosion control devices (ie: silt fence and inlet I hereby certify that this Ian was prepared b me or under pro mt.10. 5) d.-t (or .thin 24 him of a Ile• or more y y P P P Y alp. Sod merit must be removed when it n 112 the my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed height of the sediment and erosion control devise. REVISED 01- 20 -15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 2. Rwl grading on the lot shad mmimae concentrated REVISED 12- 24 -14: ADD DECKS, REVISE PORCH ON LOT 1, REVISE IMPERVIOUS AREA p t� flow and shall promote sheet now to we front and the CALCULATIONS, REVISE PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOTE, AND REVISED yt $(� Date 'Z rLY Reg: No. J_- rear. I'mat drainage patterns shown are similar W the LOT NUMBERS. _ costing conditions of the tit. - 0 AND EROSION CONTROL PROJECT NO. 1$503.00 PREPARED FOR:DONNAY HOMES 00010 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION (891.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE (891-34) = FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION d) e91.67 = TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION ; I VO(� 888.65 = 13ASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION % 892.48 = MAIN ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION 892.00 = LOWEST POINT OF ENTRY REAR WINDOWS 892.117 = ORIGINAL HOUSE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION B-�-BB aB -! �� noo.ea a 1 ai 11 ,14 snNlat 110111o6 a I OBU.46 tC L 54THFTREET WE5ii I x686,74 1 76 cosh 1 (885.681 ILL. anR -na s.I: oh 00o,OB� rc oRG rT f, -.. � Rv 1 f 11189 °56'21 Ems' BoaUo n ( „70.60 MEA 8803x 8O�?A ttCC��" 2.30 �BO.B I j w X o TSIENCE 1 DBD.2 t D I/ r 0 ROCK o CONST, v ENTRANCE AREAS LOT 1: ADDRESS 3621 54TH STREET WEST 1 I LOT AREA :5,742 Sq. IT HOU5E AREA : 1,295 5Q, PT ' Q PORCH AREA , G8 50, F•r DECK AREA 1 120 50. rT(NA) FRONT SIDEWALK AREA: 4G 50, P1° (NA) DRIVEWAY AREA : 282 50. F1• (NA) IMPERVIOUS AREA + 1,363 50. PT (23.7%) A �in NOTE: PORCH ON LOT 1 HAS 44.4 80. FT. +V V 11� ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACK, �)�, �Olf U li 1 AREAS LOT 2: ADDRESS 3625 54TH STREET . EST, I.ti I LOT AREA : 5,000 50, FT I JI W HOUSE AREA: 1,190 50. F7 PORCH AREA: 54 50. IT COVERED STOOP AREA , 30 50. I'T d DECK AREA ! 120 $0, M (NA) FRONT SIDEWALK AREA 144 50. PT (NA) ,I'� DRIVEWAY AREA 1 620 50, FT (NA) 10 IMPERVIOUS AREA I 1,27A 50. rT (2S.4%) BENCHMARK: TNH NW QUADRANT OF 54Th ST WEST AND LANE AVENUE, ELEV,- 893.18 SCALE : 1" - 2D' Legal Description: LOTS 1 & 2, BLOCK DONNAY'S DREW ADDITION, 14ENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNFSnTA CONSULTING ENGINEE PLANNERS and LAND ING 1% INC. TC 24D, BURMILM MN 66: ,I / / K (6 1�iti c m ` . "000.6 �CL �a ro m to1 1t t I�. x 4� 4 �61TU � 8110,8 xt 1 , oBl.o e° sz )6.60 g ar I I -s q' it 7tl n N ant,ol� I onl.ol�� . 10 I 11 Iri 1 .. _..._. _, ._. --- GARAG� /` ll 01 PROPOSED 11005E '.FLIT LEVEL° rc NIof 5 20.00 1 I g I GARACIE I PRb�os�D Hd�1sE "SPLIT BEVEL' 891.0 • ._ � 691.0 ( )I Im Dff; K DCCI:.1 .I LOCO x8Dti1 � • 800,0 a L6T 1 c.4 r LQ�'2a, 9 .y' 6Bl- 0MSILT FaENC�' 889.6 aa4 "•� o \ 9 QD.6� a -. A I110U5E CX15TIN x) !1 2 $l of 1 g ; e _r bB,a I I I / 11.83 008,4 dZ� i o l�i m •- to mc`�i ei a�Ia.ia �o z 01111lAtua0U8 DRIVE 0 DDD.6 4.39 GARAGE 4.14 5 S89-43'05 08x0 80,00 PLAT Be 0 I -VINYL G &NOG 80.48 MEAS. GARAGE M DP.AINAGEC UTILI rY EA3CMENT REVISED 12.24.14: ADD DECKS, REVISE PORCH ON LOT 1, REVISE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS, REVISE PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOTE, AND REVISED LOT NUMBERS. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Dale � lyg}y (k Rag: No. a U 1. All ercr o.ed 9011 ara49, 0,1M temporary 9totkples, nrvst be stab,ivad au ¢oak - pos.bla but al no 1494 later than 14 day, altar •on,tmBlon >ctwy m that p.Ab of the ads has too,roranly or parmanenkly coaued. 5ln6hte vatll temporary aced and straw maid, applied at 2 tons per acres. 2. 9d1, fence AM be nutallad and at the tocabml> haw. on the plan and around any et -kpt -. Nt Iona s.q I'd mspvn:lcd and ..'It.-d! weeuv Iona with. 24 hra or o 0.5' r..lalq ants I.al seadmg and mulehvlg I., eaddmg) of lot. 3. A rock oonetvchod entrance shad be Installed , IM maultamed M th. laoatlon zhe- on the plan. 4. Contactor or Permte4 ,hatl p-We and nlaN WaL proleetlon ed Al etorm dam mleto LIu'L INII rce 9 d,ment Wen (low 49 a r elk of tla,9lmcbon. Inlet rmalechon and malnten:nca shall renum m place ant'l al ien, Vat, rxafenhal for dei,hmge Into the .let I.. boon ¢Wbie.d. h,let P,otact n may be re cl from , rurt, 1i,, ndat d a 9prcdle ,slily, con -ern 6ei,h - (loading) II19 been Wo.,bhtld. the rcnmleo must rece- wntte„ mrces):on.lanr.4 I— the City nI CW,na veray,ng the lined for dl ,L r.mnt- .lull amlduct a visual mar -bon to delermme wh,ch Inlet. need pmlcrbon, (InWL daNSa9 moat the remoxd behce- Oct. 20th and C.L. 31 at, UcNSe> II,IK! be ralretallad by Mar, 1 5th -*the, parmltmh3). 5. If dmml gadlent 9.d -tit rraclwa6 are overlaaclad, add WIM ep gadlonl onowan contol ii-t -9 will be n,.lalled W nulace I.,finef, G. DV9t control I> th4 -p wbilky of the rc t Iwlder, The permit hdlder muck i,bew.to dust prcblem9 upon me4wma nodes from if,. DNldng Ofimui that thdu u a dont problom. 7. MINNEMA11A CREEK WA7ER5HE0 015TRICT, (952) 041.4532 U. 5tm.t deaum.3 9h.11 occur dAy or a9 naedeJ. 9. Coetact peleon for site eleannn4ns and m.Mnna.ce of the erosion and xd,-i,t nwhhnl., Chad Donnay (C 12) U 10 -4095. 10, No eancrote Washout Silo -d on eke, track W.d 9.11 conUu IL washout daw9. M,jwred, 1 I . Oil et.- an 1lty shedte to I'd de.wd er troth [Ivor dry, IV dlspamd of az a hatordous waste Inate,ul, 12, All ha Wous .seta to t,4 cleaned up IW durroecd of rep CPA otaMud9, 13. T4mparary pumped pollub -, Menlwn teclmlgueal "DANDY DEWAI r1i DAG -flock White Co. U3A hltl +UAwnv,bra:kwhlte.cw,JOp 141334(0 1337/ dandyWewularingb4gr STORNIWATCR ThI9 Stonnwat4r Manag4uatnl rlrn nn narmtwa fahnl) m i't detail how stonnwater will be controlldd to prevent danuge to ad /aemt it op v ty d id Impact, to file rubhc .kormwater en.ayo system, 1. P.-I, holder Gull ..pupa and 'U", eedment and omwon control devk•ea (., .0t lo,,d and Inlot prat -loon) ki I., vnthin 24 hre of a 1/2' ar Inoro amts.), 9ed,meet mu,t be mmoved ,Wien it I. I fe !tin height of this Win't,nt J Id nl wd canhol a-$.. 2. ruin grsd.g an It. kA elutl n¢numre cvnllntroted lbw and Gull pranote ollent Ito. to the f-L and the roar, P drmnagd patterns shown ar4 wmlar to the tyEY Bss•6s 54TH,5TKEET WEST 1 X385.74 699.9 o 880.85 l 80.75 CURB I (886.68) 01. 886.63 686.71 �T ' " �` TC GREEN FLOC TG ( T,C SERV ;v?f? .S r" 865.83 890.09 `� ; • y1• Yom; fiaGK� T CON ST UCTION N89066'21 r F ? ENTRA EE 68�. 0 9.9 83 "u.3 7 MEAS Cl x r 2 L cl� � (8 2.30m 80. ,.., .; X. > „ <y 37.30 »� I f7 j dSILTFENEE BBB.® i F,;rf y d 1 r 8 2 � 890•__. •.� r��'�'3"�i, 8` r:a 4 a 1, ! "'. 890.6 x a �: :•` x \ t� CD S r 10 ( 0 �¢ m slab `" S vE s� 11 U M m' lu '° li 90.9 .. i� N 0-.t � l 'EST -a9z -. X91.0 e66.5 666.3 �` ROCK , y e p CONST. ,1 i 12,13 ENTRANCE B91. .50 0 15.50 02.0 20.00 t eq 4. iot _. _ I r om� EXISTING Ix yr ' 6, GARAGE GAIZAgE HOUSE .tom '.fe,�> �t^;r M 12, 6.00 Ci x _ 889.2 11.68 o_._•_�_� o 8 f I L^ _ e �� mI m 111.83 8884 L Sp 890.5 I J U) 10 LU g UICUST z PROPOSED PR.b,POSED m VEST � LLI n; D_ &91.0 � N HOUSE HOUSE "SPLIT LEVEL" "SPLIT,LEVEL" r LO Z 1 i x uJ Cvld M w �I �� eM�i �2 Q V) to r x 26.00 26Y10 p N r o 891.0 m Q r \ 891.4 0 _ o .•(891.0)' 1 > g x 891.0 �0 15EG1; ~DECK 1 1 LOCUST 12 .0 12.0 0 *i 691 .1' I I BIWM OUs l 1 , , � DkflEVE 691.11 s° Ido 090.6 pa 9 666.3 680.0 co 068.3 69fl,O 1 ` I LO CO 4.39 ,10 1 1 ��90. •� r i 'PO � . •. m • GARAGE yl $ 7 t�s se ma �i �� PRDOR SED �� x 68. 4.14 7 -� ,,�59. 1 09Y.0 SILT FENCE 689.6 I 89 4 4 1; • .iii "- ^=may _ 37 30 887.9) - - x (888.9) 889.8 WALL890 :0 FyI.IF ' aa6' 687.8 8877 ` as 14.46...... g q - --sea. Wo _FFE CE 667.8 p�VffiVYL i GNaL 888.7 688.5 Bo'00 PLAT q 688.7 80.48 MEAS. DRAINAGE�a B oVs GARAGE m 589 °43'05 " °W UTILITY EASEMENT LO I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and described hereon. As prepared by me this 12T1 REVISED 01- 20 -15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. a �ELLA REVISED 12- 24 -14: ADD DECKS, REVISE PORCH ON LOT 1, REVISE IMPERVIOUS AREA M inn. Reg. No. 190E CALCULATIONS, REVISE PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOTE, AND REVISED S LOt NUMBERS JA C a Ind Q ���a, ~ –., t R Wei OR F £a m M co y 00 z O$ T— 9 ! Q �10 O al it�1a�1S 5'iS� e9�� lY O ' I IT LLL ® n/ p - - L o0o o00 ItI 11.-1 Q 5 Q U-1 � A �10 O al it�1a�1S 5'iS� e9�� lY O �.�� y'k f t zk, 1 o- ¢ g Qw a IAN 1 t l ° k S ,f 0 2 � `'� ;* Ms. ��� +yyyggg _a t" k o e In • ,�CORPOS ��� • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item A. VIII-C. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Request for consideration of changes to plans for a rezoning request that was denied by the City Council for Mathias Mortenson, 3923 49th Street. Action Requested: Allow the applicant to file a new rezoning application within one year of the time of denial of the original request. Information / Background: On July 14, 2014, the City Council denied a request to rezone the property at 3923 49th Street from R- I, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. (See attached staff report and Council minutes.) The City Council is asked to consider if the applicant has made significant enough changes to the plans to be considered again for a rezoning of the property at 3923 49th Street. Below is the City Code requirement regarding projects that have been denied for rezoning: Sec. 36 -222. Restriction on rezoning after denial of petition. After the council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition may be filed if so directed by the council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the council after presentation to the council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. The applicant has eliminated the need for the building coverage and west lot line variances, reduced the size of the building, and reduced hard cover by creating a front loading garage. (See the attached revised plans and applicant narrative.) The following would still be required: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from R -I, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; ➢ Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 10 feet the east side (adjacent to the apartment). I The plans submitted for this request were not done by a surveyor. Any formal submittal would be required include a survey done by a licensed surveyor, and the grading and drainage plans to be done by a licensed engineer to verify accuracy of the setbacks, building coverage and drainage plans. The green area shown in REPORT / RECOMMENDATION the rear yard of the site plan is actually a green roof. This would be included in the building coverage requirement. The building proposed is generally the same architecture. ATTACHMENTS: • Applicant Narrative and Revised Plans • Original Staff report and plans. Page 2 Gandrud Law February 2, 2015 Mayor, City Council, City Manager City of Edina hand delivered 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN Dear Mayor, City Council, Manager On behalf of Mathias Mortenson, AIA, and pursuant to Sec. 36 -222 of the Edina City Code, we wish to ask the City Council to allow for the Petition for Rezoning (denied by the City Council on July 15, 2014) to be filed again, before the one year restriction of the ordinance. The reason for this request is that there are changes of circumstances and facts regarding this application. We regret that the Staffs original objections were not adequately addressed, both in the design and the presentation of the project to the City Council. As a result, a better design, elimination of the lot coverage variance and resolution of drainage issues are all changes that allow for, by your ordinance, your favorable vote in allowing this project to proceed. Thank you Very truly yours Gary G ndrud 900 IDS Center 80 South 8th Street Minneapolis MN 55402 612- 396 -5544 gandrudlaw @me.com 58 58 6226 i 00 00 co t I N V = Y, H --# 60 60 eD co n N w =. -- TOWNES --FHB - -- i36.zi - -- OD w 6D zs CA O a ~ N N 136.15 iY 60 60 6D 5u #f _ 7 141.8 40 1 ' w F � N N v PAFtTC)F � A (N� 1 c O)w �� - ,D f m 1 Air"" �I11 _, -. - _ - _ _ I. i FRANCE AVE S 10 17) 47 7, lz tz 39.32 42 42 42 42 6D iw MWI-- j SITE PLAN - Rear Elevation 3923 49th STREET FEB. 10, 2015 896.6 ii II a� LOT >? AS p I - RETAINNG WALL" lED �° I a A+ATPIAS MORTENSON 2 AVENUE SOUTH 41 NEIGHBOR'S PARKING AREA MI�NO NMN 55405 I Qeaf -- Eaw1R0 (Tw.) �ELECTRIc TRANEFIXTMER 3 01 r 0 Z pi f MECHANICAL PUMP /TO DISCHARGE )))) STORM RUNOFF INTO RAIN GARDENS LANDSCAPING LEGEND PROPOSEDTREE EXISTING TREE ( \ PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN BUSH HIGH HEIGHT 4" BUSH LOW HEIGHT I....... GUARDRAIL EDINA DUPLEX 12.17 -2014 AREA COMPARISON SINGLE UNIT DESCRIPTION ORIGINAL REVISED Ales y— y— V— V —vr—v v —v 16" DUCTLE IROIIPIPE 2,395 2,204 HEIGHT - effective 25'-0 19'-6 HEIGHT -lo ridge 4 9 I T H S T R E E T I \w E S T IMPERMEABLE SURF. 1,039 932 �] —RIM = 894.10 = 88].80 ) �SDiNCE INV - BBfi.1 Smb, h Fwt — X // 9" NTRECUS CLAY PIPE O 10 4 a N89Z8!3C ' 65Si I (8\ 6� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION _ NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. BONpy/� /D—A9 ME — ON p a� SURVEY + GRADING LEGEND — - -- / _ � A FOUND IRON MONUMENT (AS NOTED) RAN Ism b t }l RowER POLE (M'IIH DUY ANCHOR) q 11 O/ D CONMUNICATONS PEDESTAL 1 ® SANITARY SEWER PINHOLE C DDDDl0IS TREE (SZE IN INCHES) l o i I Q, �wEiUffAO UOLRY LINE O 33' -41/2" j < I iWATERMNN M � T SAMTAR/ SEWER UNE !2 WALKWAY WALKWAY / M -NATURAL GAS UNE --UNDERGROUND COYYUNICATION UNE I WOOD FENCE �N I � Y I � I I EXISTING B INWS SURFACE —NG CONCRETE SURFACE I I I ®x PROPOSED SPOT EUN%r0N 121 I ;OIX EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION m EXISTING CONTOUR UNE /8gi— — PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE 896.6 ii II a� LOT >? AS p I - RETAINNG WALL" lED �° I a A+ATPIAS MORTENSON 2 AVENUE SOUTH 41 NEIGHBOR'S PARKING AREA MI�NO NMN 55405 I Qeaf -- Eaw1R0 (Tw.) �ELECTRIc TRANEFIXTMER 3 01 r 0 Z pi f MECHANICAL PUMP /TO DISCHARGE )))) STORM RUNOFF INTO RAIN GARDENS LANDSCAPING LEGEND PROPOSEDTREE EXISTING TREE ( \ PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN BUSH HIGH HEIGHT 4" BUSH LOW HEIGHT I....... GUARDRAIL EDINA DUPLEX 12.17 -2014 AREA COMPARISON SINGLE UNIT DESCRIPTION ORIGINAL REVISED Ales Area BUILDING FOOTPRINT 2,395 2,204 HEIGHT - effective 25'-0 19'-6 HEIGHT -lo ridge 33' -10 28' -2 IMPERMEABLE SURF. 1,039 932 OOR FLOOR 07 V ZI APARTMEN DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCH CT: MATHIAS MDRTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 672.655-3745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14 Il KE ZONNG 14.06.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST + WEST A4.03 DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2A29 SH ERMAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 512455-3745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14D235 REZONING 14A5.10 RESOBMT KEY PLAN FACT. RENDERING LOOKING SOUTHEAST A4.05 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN 1, V v —V —V —e wv— v—" —'- _„- - -v —V— — 6" DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERUAINq T H S T R E E T \ I 1'e E S T RIM 894.10 �'= 887.80 y ) SERVICE INV 886.1 ' —INV / 9" NTREOUS CLAY PIPE i O,L N89'28'30 "E 65.51 I (66 PLAT) B9a- I I I ��118 I !W I C I' I 1 I �I )I 1 –896— — — — N I - +¢^'.T..; 0 TO R� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. 16- 61 /2 "j--i I�� L FOUND IRON MONUMENT _ (AS NOTED) \ 1 I TO POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) 5.91 •''' COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL I I \ ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE UNOERCROU D PARKING L 1 1 I t j DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) C\.,•- 1 /,OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE f ! , 1 –896— — — — N I - +¢^'.T..; 0 TO R� LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. I E\ t FOUND IRON MONUMENT _ (AS NOTED) \ 1 I TO POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) STORY •''' COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL TWO DUPLEX I INIT WITH =�''• ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE UNOERCROU D PARKING L 1 1 I t j DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) C\.,•- 1 /,OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE /___-"WATERMAIN I ®X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION ,` ' •�• •' SANTARY SEWER LINE I MFR CH ` N2 I •' A: /NAtURAL OAS ONE I :'•` :`'� G /UNDERGROUNO COMMUNICATION LINE 1 I r:..: STORY I EXTERIOR - SPACE WITH TWO DUPLEX I INIT WITH I I.'= .''::'. PERMEABLE UNOERCROU D PARKING L 1 1 I e.'2.'" "' t SURFACE, TYP. EXISTING BITUMINOUS SURFACE 1 EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE ®X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR LINE . — PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE /Bgfi 1 RIK � 1 _ :.: Y ens �i wnai ev -� ;TTRRANSFORMETi — --892- -�5- -_ — — — 896- — — z.. ' / HEAVY SNOW COVER IN THIS AREA AT TIME OF FIELDWORK _897— 897 _ �aP` \896 - -r _894 - -�' N88'49'39 "W 65.78 41J ° ( NORTH O�T-E- TH SOUTHERL-FEET !X: PREPARED FOR: 4? TIMBER RETAINING WALL MONUMEN MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH PARKING AREA MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 I I I NOTES: 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE. INSURANCE COMMITMENT. 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I. D.:18 -028- 24 -14 -0027 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SQ. FT. 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 T� 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT "AT SW CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET WEST. ELEVATON a 887.72 (NGVD) DRAFT VERSION oklGmAL h0j Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. BRAEMAR GOLF URSE UPDATE — RECEIVED Joe Abood, Braemar Golf a General Manager, introduced himself, described his professional background, and stated he es great ential with the Braemar Golf Course. The Council welcomed Mr. Abood. V.B. JULY EAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC: CONSERVATION INCENTIVES Communi tions Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary o inions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to conservation incentives. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. A. PRELIMINARY REZONING, LOT AREA AND WIDTH VARIANCES, BUILDING COVERAGE VARIANCE AND SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE, 3923 49TH STREET, MATHIAS MORTENSON — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -79 ADOPTED TO DENY Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Mathias Mortenson regarding 3923 490 Street, for preliminary rezoning from R- I Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; a lot area variance from 15,000 sq. ft. to 8,816 sq. ft.; lot width variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; building coverage variance from 25% to 32 %; and, side yard setback variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. Mr. Mortenson was proposing to tear down a single - family house and construct a new double dwelling unit. Mr. Teague reviewed the Council's past sketch plan consideration and the proponent's attempt to address some of the expressed concerns. It was noted the Planning Commission had recommended approval of the requested rezoning contingent upon approval of the variances. The motion of the Planning Commission related to the requested variances failed on a 4 -4 vote. Staff recommended denial based on the rationale that the combination of variances was too much for this particular site; the building would exceed lot coverage; and, a reasonable use existed. Mr. Teague answered questions of the Council relating to the impact of approving the requested rezoning and denying the requested variances, and lot dimensions within this block. The Council acknowledged written public comment received. Proponent Presentation Mathias Mortenson, architect representing the proponent, 2429 Sheridan Avenue, Minneapolis, described design revisions that he believed created an improved project, better fit the neighborhood, and uniqueness of this site. He stated the proposed design accommodated age -in -place housing and asked the Council to approve the request, as revised. The Council asked questions of Engineer Millner relating to site drainage and stormwater storage capacity and of Attorney Knutson relating to variance conditions to restrict the use to a duplex. Mr. Mortenson defined the revised ridge height and stated a preliminary grading and drainage plan had been developed by his civil engineer and submitted to the Council committing to handling 90% of all drainage and runoff on site. Mr. Mortenson stated the hard surface exterior spaces could be constructed of permeable pavers but the proposed rain gardens would meet the sustainability goal. He indicated the solar panels on a south - facing gable would accommodate electrical needs to reduce consumption of resources. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:52 p.m. Public Testimony Nancy Thorvilson, 7221 Oaklawn Avenue, addressed the Council. Jon Andresen, 4804 Maple Road, addressed the Council. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 15, 2014 Ben Hackel, 7105 Glouchester Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Teague addressed issues raised during public testimony on types of variances that had been considered in this area. Mr. Mortenson indicated his building footprint included all uses on the block but even when considering only the residential -type uses; his proposal remained in line with the average structure. The Council discussed the proposal and asked questions of Mr. Mortenson and Mr. Teague relating to use of the lower level and site drainage. Support was expressed for the improved design, sustainability aspects, and redevelopment of a site bordered on either side by a parking lot. Council Discussion & Action Council concern was expressed related to the requested lot coverage variance, lack of hardship required for variance consideration, storm water drainage, ineffective location of two rain gardens at the rear of the property, and potential risk of sanitary infiltration and inflow due to proposed excavations that lacked positive surface drainage. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -79, Denying Preliminary Rezoning from R -I to R -2; Lot Area and Width Variances; Building Coverage Variances; and, Side Yard Setback Variances, based on the following findings: 2.01 The variance criteria are not met. 2.02 The current zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2.03 The multiple variances requested demonstrate the property is not suitable for R -2 zoning. 2.04 There are no practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner prohibited by the Zoning Ordinance. It is not reasonable to deviate from the ordinance requirements when there is nothing unique about the property that justifies the variances. The need for variances is caused by the applicant's desire to build such a large two - family dwelling on the site. 2.05 Reasonable use of the property exists with the two -story single family currently located on the property. 2.06 The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. 2.07 The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single - family home or duplex) and building a new one. 2.08 Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with the single family home. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Sprague, Swenson, Hovla Nays: Brindle Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COM NT No one appeared to cot Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.D. SKETCH PON — 7200\FRANCE AVENUE — REVIEWED Mayor Hovland explained the purse of sketch plan review, which did not include a public hearing, noting the application process that followed included four opportunities for public testimony. Page 3 4y91�,1� o e, �y CORPORF`l 1888 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑ Discussion ❑x Date: July 15, 2014 Information ❑ Subject• Public Hearing; Preliminary Rezoning, Lot Area and Width Variances, Building • Coverage Variance and Side Yard setback Variance at 3923 491h Street, Mathias Mortenson, Resolution No. 2014 -79. Action Requested: Planning Commission Recommendation: On June 25, 2014 the Planning Commission made a motion to approve the requested rezoning and variances. The motion failed on a 4 -4 Vote. The Planning Commission further recommended approval of the rezoning contingent on the approval of the variances as requested. Vote: 7 Ayes & I Nay. (See attached minutes.) Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of the rezoning and variances per the findings in the Planning Commission staff report and Resolution No. 2014 -79. If the Council wishes to approve the rezoning and variance; authorize staff to draft a resolution approving the rezoning and variances to be brought back at the August 4th Council meeting. Information / Background: Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single - family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. (See property location on pages AI —A5, and the applicant's plans and narrative on pages A6 -A33 in the Planning Commission Staff Report.) The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ A Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; ➢ Building Coverage from 25% to 32 %; and ➢ Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. The applicant went through a Sketch Plan review with the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the minutes from each review on pages A34 —A37.) In an effort to address some of the concerns raised, the applicant has eliminated one of the drive entrances to the site, and the handicap accessible walkway to sidewalk to the front of the house. This reduced the impervious surface on the lot. (See side by side comparison on page A8 -A9.) The applicant has also slightly reduced the footprint of the structure, City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 eliminated the front yard and side yard setback, variances, and the retaining wall setback variance. The mass and scale of the structure architecture of the structure remain generally the same. (See pages A 18 —A 19.) The applicant narrative indicates a building coverage variance from 25% to 28 %, however, the patios were not taken into account. City Code requires patios to be included in the building coverage calculation, with a 200 square foot credit. The patios total 648 square feet, therefore, 448 square feet must be added to the building coverage. The building coverage with the 448 square feet added is 32 %. The applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers as part of the patio. While the pervious pavers would assist in site runoff, the city does not have an Ordinance provision to reduce impervious surface requirement with the use of pervious pavers. Variances would still be required for lot coverage even if full credit were given to the pervious pavers. ATTACHMENTS: Minutes from the June 25, 2014 Edina Planning Commission meeting Memo from the environmental engineer Planning Commission Staff Report, June 25, 2014 o� e .3y • IN�RroM'�� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague June 25, 2014 VI.B. Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description Mathias Mortenson is proposing to tear down a single - family home and construct a new double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. (See property location on pages Al —A5, and the applicant's plans and narrative on pages A6 -A33.) The property is located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and east of a four story apartment building. To accommodate the request the applicant is requesting the following: ➢ A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District; ➢ Lot Area Variance from 15,000 s.f. to 8,816 s.f.; ➢ Lot Width Variance from 90 feet to 65 feet; ➢ Building Coverage from 25% to 32 %; and ➢ Side yard setback Variance from 15 feet to 5 feet 10 inches on the east side. The applicant went through a Sketch Plan review with the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the minutes from each review on pages A34 —A37.) In an effort to address some of the concerns raised, the applicant has eliminated one of the drive entrances to the site, and the handicap accessible walkway to sidewalk to the front of the house. This reduced the impervious surface on the lot. (See side by side comparison on page A8 -A9.) The applicant has also slightly reduced the footprint of the structure, eliminated the front yard and side yard setback variances, and the retaining wall setback variance. The mass and scale of the structure architecture of the structure remain generally the same. (See pages Al8 —A19.) The applicant narrative indicates a building coverage variance from 25% to 28 %, however, the patios were not taken into account. City Code requires patios to be included in the building coverage calculation, with a 200 square foot credit. The patios total 648 square feet, therefore, 448 square feet must be added to the building coverage. The building coverage with the 448 square feet added is 32 %. The applicant is proposing to use pervious pavers as part of the patio. While the pervious pavers would assist in site runoff, the city does not have an Ordinance provision to reduce impervious surface requirement with the use of pervious pavers. Variances would still be required for lot coverage even if full credit were given to the pervious pavers. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A single family home; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Easterly: Apartment building; zoned PRD -4, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Southerly: Vacant property (formerly Edina Realty); zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District and Guided Mixed Use, MXC. Westerly: A single story double dwelling unit; zoned R -2 Double- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Attached Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 8,816 square feet in size, and contains a two -story single family home. The site is elevated above the two - family dwelling to the west. (See pages A3 and A29.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Grading /Drainage /Utilities Low Density Attached Residential R -2, Double- Dwelling District The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans, and identified several concerns. (See memo on page A41.) Should the City Council approve the proposed project, the applicant would be required to address these concerns with revised plans as part of the Final Rezoning application. Please note that the grading plans were not done by a licensed professional engineer. This application predates that current application requirement. If the Planning Commission and /or City Council approve this project, it would be a Preliminary approval. A condition of approval should therefore, be that a grading, drainage and stormwater control plan, done by a licensed professional engineer, be submitted with the final rezoning application to be 2 considered by the Planning Commission and Council during final consideration. Proposed Floor Plans The plans show a lower level studio within each unit that could easily be designed as additional units within the structure. These two "studios" are separated from the rest of the living units. To access the upper units from these lower studios, a person would have to walk outside or through the garage. (See page A14.) Should the applications be approved, a condition should be added that these not become separate dwelling units. Compliance Table *Variance Required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Rezoning from R -1 to R -2 is reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single - family and two - family dwellings. (See pages A4 and A22 -A32.) Two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. 3 City Standard (R -2) Proposed Building Setbacks 34.5 feet 15 feet 15 feet 35 feet 35 feet 15 feet 6 inches 5 feet 10 inches* 36 feet Front Side Side Rear Retaining Wall Setback 3 feet 4 feet Lot Width 90 feet 65 feet* Lot Area 15,000 square feet 8,816 square feet* Building Height 30 feet 28 feet Building Coverage 25% 32 %* *Variance Required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Rezoning from R -1 to R -2 is reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: The proposed use would fit in to the neighborhood. This neighborhood consists of both single - family and two - family dwellings. (See pages A4 and A22 -A32.) Two dwelling units are the predominant uses on this block. 3 2. The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided for Low Density Attached Residential. The proposed duplex would fit that category. Duplexes serve as a transitional land use area between the commercial properties to the south and the single - family residential area to the north. • Are the proposed Variances reasonable for this site? No. Staff believes that the proposed Variances are not reasonable for the site for the following reasons: 1. The combination of all of the requested variances would result in a structure that is too large for this small parcel. 2. The applicant has not adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Planning Commission and the City Council during the sketch plan review of this request. Concern was raised in regard to the home fitting into the neighborhood. The Council stated that the height and lot coverage of the structure should be reduced. While the proposed home has been reduced in size, setback variances have been eliminated, driveways and sidewalks have been eliminated; however, the mass, scale and architecture of the home remains generally the same. The City has traditionally not granted lot coverage variances. No lot coverage variances have been granted for a tear down and rebuild of a single - family home or duplex. Concern was also raised in regard to the retaining walls and safety. The applicant has addressed the issue by eliminating one of the driveways, and moved the retaining wall four feet away from the side lot line. (See page Al 2.) 3. The variance criteria are not met. Per state law and the Edina Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? No. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 4 the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by the small size of the subject property. As demonstrated on page A4, the lot is the smallest lot on the south side of 49th Street. It is similar in size to the lots across the street, which contains single - family homes. However, the proposed home on this small lot would be too large for the site. The size of the proposed structure creates the need for a lot coverage variance, and side yard setback variances. As mentioned above, the city has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage. Therefore, staff believes the proposed home is not reasonable for the size of this small lot. The building coverage for the existing single family home and detached garage in the rear yard is 12 %. The proposed structure would more than double the building coverage for the lot, and far exceed the city code requirement. Reasonable use exists on the property with the existing single family home. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The circumstance of the undersized lot is not unique to this neighborhood. There are several undersized R -1 and R -2 lots on this block. (See page A3-A4.) c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Yes. The proposed structure is too large for this lot. No setback or lot coverage variances have been granted on any of the lots on this block, on which new duplexes have been built. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed Rezoning and Variances at 3923 49th Street. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The variance criteria are not met. 2. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. The property owner does not propose to use the property in a reasonable manner 5 prohibited by the zoning ordinance. It is not reasonable to deviate from the ordinance requirements when there is nothing unique about the property that justifies the variances. The need for variances is caused by the applicants desire to build such a large two- family dwelling on the site. 3. Reasonable use of the property exists with the two -story single family currently located on the property. 4. The size of the proposed structure creates the need for the lot coverage variance, and the side yard setback variance. 5. The City has traditionally not granted variances for building lot coverage when tearing down a home (single - family home or duplex) and building a new one. 6. Proposed building coverage would be nearly triple the building coverage that exists today with the single family home. Deadline for a city decision: July 15, 2014 Uj u I 48TH 5T 48TH 5T LLF a 49TH ST W - -- 5T W !" 5p H ST 50TH ST W — — — Q. Uj js- *,` 51ST ST W �r {• V. LU LLJ z Parcel 18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 A -T -B: Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. /NN ID: Print Date: 1/14/2014} Owner Baker Bean Llc Market w Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! is AM k21, _S_1TH ST 'fJ —.. — HVSParcel "«18- •�_ - -�-�` x^ � Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 028 -24 -14 -0027 A- T -B: 4809 ID: Print Date: 1/14/2014 Owner 4813 Name: 4813 Total: 4812 Parcel 4800 Tax 4817 - ___ Total: _ Property Sale Type: Residential 4821 This map is a compilation of data from various 4817 - - - - - -- sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- 4800 representation or warranty expressed or 4825 Date: 4821 4824 purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and 4829 - Parcel 0.21 acres — Area: 4833 4832 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 4833 4825 4830 4837 4836 4837 4829 4846 4841 4840 4841 - — �� F 4844 4845 4833 483 I - 18_�r� 5 4845 1 l 3940 , 3938 3932 u2i 4848 4849 4837 j J l I��13 43 54 j 4853 4852 4853 49TH ST IL-V 4901 4900 4901 4005 3949 3945 3941 3937 3927 3923 3901 4905 4904 4905 — 4909 4908 4N- 9 — - 4912 4915 24 3948 13944 3936 ; 3930 39181 4916 4917 4916 4917 , -- ! 1 4921 4920921 49 1/2 ST w 4924 4925 _4929 4928 24 l 24 4930? 4932 4933 24 24 24 !3925! — - 4936 4937- 4999 - 4941 24 4100 <I, x O 448 3808 is 4945 - 3930 3424 :. X 3 922 3906 r I 39021 ' I 3724 z j ( , AM k21, _S_1TH ST 'fJ —.. — HVSParcel "«18- •�_ - -�-�` x^ � Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N 028 -24 -14 -0027 A- T -B: ID: Print Date: 1/14/2014 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Sale Type: Residential Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: Date: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.21 acres Sale Area: 9,086 sq ft Code: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 , , 11hin.. Green! AM R �R Parcel 18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 A -T -B: ID: Owner Market _ Name: Total: I Parcel 3923 49Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55424 Total: Property Residential Sale Type: Price: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.21 acres Area: 9,086 sq ft A3 z, r tp Map Scale: 1" 100 ft. Print Date: 1/14/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 a Ix W CL W Z 0 49TH ST W i 48TH ST W J w a W U Z LL LL. Legend EEEI 0 �a IN 1 1111"111 L-1- N �... �uv o.,1 W +E Q ooa S SEE SEE DETAIL 51ST ST W I I ! 51 ST ST W > W W � - -- — W 9NA.A 50th & France Zoning Map Ll�1H e' City of Edina ' Hennepin County, Minnesota l Alt W Q W U Z Q LL O Z a O U CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY W— W— W— W— W —W -- I W —v —v —v \,6 u —v 6' DUCIILE IRON PIPE WATERMAI% 49 i TH S T R EETI \WEST RIM a 8974.10 SERVICE INV = 886.1 _K M Feat ] XM1 WV 88 .80 — _ X' A ®o -)> -) -> -�> > ) -> ) ) -)) ->> -. -) / 9' VITREOUS GUY PIPE gr 1k LEGAL DESCRIPTION: +'� I N89'28'30 °E 65.51 -• I (66 PLAT) \ ,y�P ��93 THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION / N0. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING _NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. ON + py _qFr, l.b 895-- _8: _ .1., ,,. /. ••'�' ,' /.' I 897- _ FOUND IRON MONUMENT ,' .- , /: -•., / I ,: WATER AND \ I d ' 'il: W (AS �` NOTED) SANITARY SERVICE \ s I�.:' •• ','y_ / I UNES FROM CITY OF \ I °� )] POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) • I t...! ^ " EDINA ENgNEERING I I • :�l ^. I DEPT. - NOT FIELD I ', VERIFIED �` I O COMMUNICATONS PEDESTAL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ✓`: I i I I F"ti DECIDUOUS;4REE (SIZE IN INCHES) ": : '.I ° :s} :.:.. • I I I - ',e a /OVERHEAD UnUTY UN& ,• : I COVERS I 6, '• �Ir /WAT_N SEWER UNE 16.11 I I I �hKTURAL GAS LINE /UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE % II 2 STORY HOUSE 8e223 �^ b I FENCE ':. - 9.7 I CONCRETE SURFACE / I I II , • A , r) �• I I BITUMINOUS SURFACE LOT 35 2 1 q \ ) NOTE I 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. I ii,. • ^ 7 • �' 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 1 . ' r _•. / \ 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I.D.:18- 028 -24-14 -0027 ok 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 S Q. FT. I Ii°•..; // I '`. '• .,' = 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. ;eciLwiDr1'; •,�a,, �,� I s-.Y -%'•��'����- �` ^`� ^,� � fU `';` 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 I � 1.' ^ ~' / 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW Xt "n .± '` CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET / ^K• +Ae /u'77y�6I�., " WEST. ELEVATON = 887.72 (NGVD) / '' -� ,7RANSFORMEF[''• , / r..:^ �/ _ ARD OV R A AT10N 1 1 j:* ',. HOUSE: 642 SO, FT ^.77 5.9 I GARAGE T - GARAGE: 456 SQ. FT. I I I I FFE - 897.7 I CONCRETE: 1,704 SQ. FT. TOTAL HARDCOVER: 2,802 SQ. FT OR 31.8% / I l I / R, HEAVY SNOW COVER IN THIS AREA AT THE OF FIELDWORK CERTIFICATION 5, 1 / I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report / / F Was prepared by me or under my direct supervision It j/ and that I am a duty Licensed Land Surveyor �1 under the laws of the state of Minnesota. = __==- -- ��- _- _- r -894 RWFD:'t N88.49'39'W ,�/ b TaWI. W. V9e N.* MOt 0. Pndm.Icnm sw..yw toe 65.78 MIaM9a. PAN�.bml w III NORTH LINE OF THE JOB / 2013005 158UED: 2 -21 -2013 \ - SOUTHERLY 177.5 DRAWN BY: TWIT! REV: PREPARED FOR: FEET OF LOT 32 AS MATHIAS MORTENSON S MONUMENT I SCALE: 1' . 10 FEET 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH VAN NESTE SURVEYING MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES 85 WILDHURST ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 V S PHONE (952) 686 -3055 TOLL-FREE FAX (866) 473 -0120 WWW.VANNESTESURV"NG.COM SFIEE'r I OF 1 xall(AV, REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 3923 49'" STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 PROJECT INTRODUCTION The proposed project is a new 2 -story double dwelling unit on 49th Street. The location is one block north of SOth and France on a street that predominantly consists of double dwelling units. The lot is currently zoned R -1, thus requiring a re- zoning to R -2. In February, this project was brought before the Planning Commission and the City Council. In addition a draft staff report was completed in March. This re- submission addresses to the greatest extent possible the various issues raised by those three entities. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The property at 3923 49th Street is highly unusual. First, it is a single - family lot situated on a street that is predominantly double dwellings. More critically, it is adjacent to a high- density 4- story apartment building, two commercial properties, and one double dwelling unit. This sets it apart from any other lot on 49th Street and, indeed, from most other lots throughout the city. In addition, it is cradled by a Height Overlay District that allows adjacent properties to build up to 48' high. A thorough survey of the city and its Height Overlay Districts (See Attachment A), reveals that there are only eight other residential properties in this situation and that, of those eight, only two adjoin HOD'S of 48 feet or greater. While those final two are both zoned R -1, neither sits on a street that is predominantly comprised of R -2 lots. In other words, for a variety of reasons, this lot is an anomaly, completely unique in the city. One other factor may also serve as an extenuating circumstance, and that is the recent purchase by the city of the commercial property to the south. The existing Edina Realty building has since been demolished and an expansion of the nearby parking ramp is currently being considered. While this may not have a direct bearing on how this proposal is evaluated, it does present a very real hardship to the owner, potentially diminishing the value of the property and casting shadows on the rear yard for much of the day. For these reasons, and others, it is our hope that the City shares our view that our project's proposed variances are justified by the unusual conditions of the site. Finally, we submit two of our primary project goals which we believe align well with the City's housing goals as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan: PROJECT GOAL #1: ACCESSIBILITY The owner is seeking to provide a housing type largely absent from the city's housing stock, one that accommodates the particular needs of an aging population. Although, the owner is driven by an interest in homesteading in one of the units, the design also coincides perfectly with the city's own interests. According to the Comprehensive Plan "The challenge for the city is to adapt itself as a lifecycle community to conform to the needs of a changing population" (p.40), and that change is principally happening to the +65 demographic where growth is expected to exceed 100% by 2030 (CP, p. 24). The proposed development would address exactly this challenge through a number of means: 1 A10A4�t REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 1. All necessities (kitchen, bath, laundry, etc.) would be provided for on a single level 2. An elevator would connect the below grade parking to the upper two floors 3. The main bathroom would include ADA accessible fixtures 4. ADA turning radii and clearances provided where necessary 5. A basement studio that could serve as living quarters for in -home care. PROJECT GOAL #2: SUSTAINABILITY The project aims to achieve the highest standard of sustainability. It will incorporate rooftop solar panels that are expected to supply the entire electrical needs for both units. The building will also employ advanced framing techniques to achieve a 25% reduction in lumber consumption and 5% increase in energy efficiency. Other more conventional sustainability measures will include high efficiency glazing, permeable pavers, materials with recycled content and low -flow fixtures, among others. A7 REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 RESPONSE TO COUNCIL, COMMISION, PLANNING + NEIGHBORS: Below is a list of the concerns as expressed in the preliminary zoning review as stated in the City Council minutes, February 3, 2014: "(1.) Reconfigure the garages to require one driveway /curb cut and lower impervious surface; (2.) assure safety (guardrail /fence /landscaping) was sufficient along the retaining wall; (3.) refine the building plan to lower lot coverage /building height /hardscape; (4.) assure architectural elements and site components meet the essential character of the existing neighborhood; and, (S.) consider feasibility of repurposing the existing single - family home." 1A. RECONFIGURE GARAGES /PARKING LAYOUT CONCERN: The original design proposed two drives on either side of the lot accessing an underground garage. This raised two concerns: 1. It presented an excessive amount of driveway, asphalt and retaining wall to the street, rendering it distinctly uncharacteristic of the neighborhood 2. It created an 'island' effect that isolated the stretch of yard between the two drives from the fabric of front yards of adjoining residential properties RESPONSE: The East drive has been completely eliminated. This makes the proposed driveway consistent with other double dwelling units on the block. It also allows for more greenspace in the front yard and creates greater continuity with similar nearby front yards. Additionally, it resolves another concern that the stretch of curb between the two originally proposed drives would be too small to accommodate street parking. This is no longer the case. BEFORE AFTER 1B. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE + STORMWATER RUNOFF CONCERN: The original design proposed an ADA accessible ramp to the front entry and a two - driveway parking layout that raised concerns regarding: 1. Amount of runoff directed to the city storm system, and 2. The amount of land dedicated to hardscape rather than landscape RESPONSE: Three things have been done to address the concern regarding impervious surface 1. Patio sizes were reduced ki RE20NING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 2. The front entry steps were eliminated, and one 3. One drive was eliminated, Together, this resulted in considerable reductions in impervious surface as illustrated by the below study: EXISTING IMP. SURF. 1356 SF WALKWAY 333 SF GARAGE 0 455 SF ! I 1782 SF ORIGINAL PROPOSAL IMP. SURF. - 924 SF WALKWAY - 404 SF i I Y Y 1 I i Y I I 1 Y I Y I Y GARAGE 0 0 SF Y I Y I I TOTAL C'CQVERAG` = =`_ 1328 SF REVISED P►2O+�OSAL IMP. SURF. - 543 SF WALKWAY - 340 SF I � I Y I GARAGE w 0 SF I i 1 ----------------- TOTAL COVERAGE 883 SF This reduction is in addition to other tools used to reduce hardscape and runoff: permeable pavers used at outdoor spaces and a rear -yard raingarden to collect runoff from the roof. 2. RETAINING WALL /SAFETY CONCERN: The retaining walls related to the below -grade drives generated the following concerns: 1. A wall that appeared overly high and /or stark from the street 2. The need for providing a guard rail for safety on one side 3. A sense that it effectively increased the perceived height of the building RESPONSE: Because one of the below grade drives was eliminated, the concern regarding the visual impact of the associated retaining walls has been partially alleviated. Additionally, the retaining walls for the remaining drive have been improved: 1. A stepped or canted wall for one side of the drive presents a softer surface 2. An ivy wall is proposed to cover the rear (or southernmost) wall 3. The exposed retaining walls will be stained or colored concrete so as to provide a warmer, more appealing aesthetic Al REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 4. A strip of plantings along one retaining wall will prevent any access to the wall edge. The wall on the opposite side of the drive was essentially eliminated by manipulating the grading. 3A. SITE COVERAGE + BUILDING INTENSITY CONCERN: The amount of site coverage was viewed as problematic based largely on two concerns: 1. It represents a higher intensity than is typical for the neighborhood, and 2. It reduces the amount of useable exterior greenspace. RESPONSE: The total site coverage has been reduced from 28.2% to 27.1 %. This is the most that could be reduced without compromising the goal of providing an accessible form of single - floor living. We believe that our site is unusual in a number of regards and that the proposed coverage does not represent an unduly intense amount given the context (see related Zoning Narrative). 3B. BUILDING HEIGHT CONCERN: The concern was that the retaining walls for the parking, together with the gable would render the building overly high for the neighborhood. RESPONSE: The peak of the gable and the elevation of the eave were lowered by one and a half feet. The retaining wall for the side drive was also treated in a way that would make it seem shorter and distinct from the building structure. 4. EXISTING CHARACTER CONCERN: The previous design did not specifically address this concern. The block does not consist of any predominant style. The houses range from small single family bungalows at street level to larger homes atop hills; from simple low -rise, hiproofed duplexes to large, articulated -gable duplexes; and from one- and two -story dwelling units to a four story apartment building. Despite this lack of architectural continuity, there is still a predominant 'feel' to the street which is largely constituted, as in many other city neighborhoods, by a well - developed greenscape consisting of mature shade trees near the street and a variety of hedges, arborvitae, and smaller -scale landscaping near the homes. This revision proposes a landscaping similar to established patterns on the street, consisting of at least one medium -sized trees in the front lawn and smaller -scale shrubbery at the front of the house. 5. REPURPOSE EXISTING BUILDING This idea was explored but is challenged by two significant issues: 1.) It is cost - prohibitive, and 2.) It requires a second site on which to situate the house Vk 0 REZONING + VARIANCE APPLICATION 392349 TH STREET PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA JUNE 10, 2014 6. ADDITIONAL CONCERNS: NUMBER OF VARIANCES CONCERN: The re- zoning and the proposed design triggered multiple variance requests, suggesting the possibility that the use, or the design, or both were not viable at the site. RESPONSE: A number of moves were made, in addition to those stated above, that have made the building more compliant. 1. The building was shifted four feet to the south to eliminate a need for a rear yard setback 2. The building was shifted five feet to the east to eliminate a need for a side yard setback. This move also was made to be more sensitive to the residence to the west which otherwise may have had some portion of their lawn cast in shadow. Additionally, moving the house closer to the apartment building has no negative effects since there is only a surface level parking lot there. This has been confirmed in discussions with the proprietors of the apartments. 3. The side drive was shifted three feet to the east to eliminate a need for a zero lot line retaining wall. Aq PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN -VVVV V V— V— V- �V— V— V— V— V-- TT--V— V— V— V— V— V— y —V —VV- 6' DUCI9.E IRON PIPE WATERMAIN \ 1 49 i TFi STREET \7II15\EST _RIM 694.10 Smq m Frt INV 887.80 -SERVICE 8N 886.1 0 10 XM1 L ,- X� R ) ) ) �) T) �) ) —) ) ) — ) —)—) —) ) — / 9' MTREOUS CLAY PI � / I 45 -- \ A� 4, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: N89'28'30 "E 65.51 -� I (66 PLAT) \ �° --893- THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDMSION S► NO 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING •. �•.: •.: •.: •.: •.: : • •. _ _ _ _. _. - _. _, NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. I� I I I ' I I II = �9`d�� tii• �I , -' 151-6 I i I I m I' I IiRENtbH DRAIN :e �3 3 ICI I I m Xt�l 15 %6 112 "L L9n >11\ 5'91 I \ I I --896 -- - - — �/__N N F - FREAICH DRAIN _ I PROPOSED TWO STORY DUPLEX UNIT WITH UNOERGROU1 D PARKINS _ t AT /rAC E oa ca `;-_L - - -892- - - -893-__ l -- -894 -- - - - 895- - - --- 896- -- --- 897- -- - -- 898 -- -�� _ _ --897- - \ • (AS OUND IRON NOTED) MONUMENT POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) • ® COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) I OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE CIA I �WATERNNN 1( I SANITARY SEWER LINE 1'.'' '• NATURAL GAS LINE I UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE EXTERIOR SPACE WITH WODO FENCE L I PERMEABLE SURFACE, TYP. EXISTING BTIU.INOUS SURFACE I i EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE I I I I ®X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION I I� c aX EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR LINE i /.:'.: `. �.': '. •y6-.- - PROPOSED CONTOUR LINE � 1 1 -1 > "rJ•;.,; 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE clT - =., delgle:, = BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. .: •TRANSFORMER •_, "' 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 I / ;3,'.': ;. : ':.•' :.• 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I.D.:18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 3) PARCEL AREA: 8,816 SO. FT. • ,• `• 4 BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. �/ J., • 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET /)f HEAVY SNDW cooER WEST. ELIEVATON a 887.72 (NGVD) / IN THIS AREA AT / TIME OF FIELDWORK — — R � 0 1 ) t ;, _ _ -- _---- - - - - -- -- _ - --695 - -_ e•�� -596 __ - - - - - -- - -I-_- _ - - -890 - - -� -�` N88'49'39 "W 65.78 ( NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET OF LOT ]2 AS I i PREPARED FOR: p° TIMBER RETNNING WALL NONUMENIED a� �a I o MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH �� NEIGHBOR'S PARKING AREA I MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN DRAFT VERSION PRELIMINARY PROPOSED GRADING PLAN fi DUCTILE IRON PIPE WATERIIAM 4 3 i T H :i T P 'ti :. T \3I1tY\1n E S T RIM - 894.10 BB7.80 a 3 -SERVICE INV -886.1 Y� X , $ —) —> >_ > T) -I-- -> x-> > > > >> X > —�> / 9' MTREOUS CLAY PIPE tj N89'28'30 "E 65.51 , I (66 PLAT) =o I I — —896- 1 1 I S x I CONCRETE WALKWAY �Q6 —89� ,- FRENCH DRAIN A� AT OVERHEAR d DOOR Y I (_ () PROPOSED TWO ST PIA T I o DUPLEX UNIT WT UNDERGROUND PAR I i 'I ICI I I I / I / 7p I P' A T 1 0 =1 E \ s.9I A^ I e eel a �a sm 1 of _ I I a I ••':''•. i''• 30 FOOT SETBAC Iv nn _ 3 I ®M1 1 I I I I I I 28 o j ORY a I KING PATIO I I. FRENCH DRAIN OR CATCH BASIN AT BOTTOM OF - / EGRESS WELL \ \ -30 FOOT SETBACK — I 6.4 10.1 II >; l 1 I ?A I P A T 110 I — eae I ( --ago- ,--894 z —891— 1 —892— I \ 1� —693— 894— ' I PREPARED FOR: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 V V- a X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION S /k In Frt PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE 0 10 1 PRV t o�s ,yI • ^ - - - - -- ----- - -r - -- N88'49'39 "W 65.78 d ° NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 -FEET OF LOT 32 AS e �9 TIMBER RETAINING WALL MONUMENTEO os I a N19GHBOR'S PARKING AREA I I I I A(3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PART OF LOT 32, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 172, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA LYING NORTH OF THE SOUTHERLY 177.5 FEET THEREOF. I FrFNn• FOUND IRON MONUMENT (AS NOTED) }) POWER POLE (WITH GUY ANCHOR) 13 COMMUNICATIONS PEDESTAL ® SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 0 DECIDUOUS TREE (SIZE IN INCHES) WI --- /OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE —N ----SANITARY SEWER UNE /NATURAL GAS UNE 0 /UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION UNE WOOD FENCE EXISTING — .IN.US SURFACE EXISTING CONCRETE SURFACE ®X PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION a X EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION g9T/ / EXISTING CONTOUR UNE / PROPOSED CONTOUR UNE 1 PRV t o�s ,yI • ^ NOTES: 1) THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT. 2) ADDRESS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY: 3923 49TH STREET WEST, EDNA, MN 55410 P.I.D.:18- 028 -24 -14 -0027 3) PARCEL AREA 8,816 SO. FT. 4) BEARING BASIS IS ASSUMED. 5) DATE OF FIELDWORK: 2 -11 -2013 6) BENCHMARK: TOP NUT HYDRANT AT SW CORNER OF FRANCE AVE AND 49TH STREET WEST. ELEVATON - 887.72 (NGVD) reby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Tm I. W. Van NwW, L9n� Pmfo=Wwl surveyor /44109 MKN9an Pmfeewonal /46695 JOB / 2013005 ISSUED: 2-28-2014 DRAWN BY: TNWN REV: SCALE: 1' - 10 FEET VAN NESTE SURVEYING PROFESSIONAL SURVEYING SERVICES V is 85 WILDHURST ROAD EXCELSIOR, MN 55331 PHONE (952) 686 -3055 TOLL-FREE FAX (866) 473 -0120 WWW.VANNESTESURVEYING.COM SHEET 1 t M v n �e °v DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHFT T.' MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 612ZSSZ145 CONTRACTOR DRAWN BY MHM 14.9.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN FLOOR PLANS LEVELO LEVEL 1 A2.01 t 3g g3. NI ED oW z zr wzz�rc z N� �NZ WiKO< OF 2 �NPI c O ww o p0� LLJJ CnW Q�eaifu � t 3g g3. 4s1 CP -1 PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVERS T -1 1 "x 1" MOSAIC TILE ST -1 BOTTICINO MARBLE SILL AND TRIM. HONED FINISH moa�wx :.. .............. S-1 STUCCO WITH FINE SAND FINISH. BY MATERIALS WORLD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR: HARVEST GOLD, LIGHT WD-1 VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING; COLOR: MISSION BROWN R -1 THREE -TAB ASPHALT SHINGLE; COLOR:ONYX SPA SUNMODULE SOLAR PANEL, SW 250 MONO OR APPROVED EQUAL DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 49th STREET EDINA. MN ARCHITECT: MAT ]AS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 56405 672 .855x745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM 1422. REZOMW 14.0.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST + WEST A4.01 CP -1 PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVERS T -1 1 "z 1" MOSAIC TILE ST -1 BOTTICINO MARBLE SILL AND TRIM. HONED FINISH S-1 STUCCO WITH FINE SAND FINISH. BY MATERIALS WORLD OR APPROVED EQUAL; COLOR: HARVEST GOLD, LIGHT WD-1 VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING; COLOR: MISSION BROWN R -1 THREE - TABASPHALT SHINGLE; COLOR:ONYX SP -1 SUNMODULE SOLAR PANEL, SW 250 MONO OR APPROVED EQUAL $—r.- ce<- >.-- - - - - -- DOUBLE DWELLING 3923 48th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MAT HIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDANAVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 ---745 CONTRACTOR DRAWN BY MHM 14M2 REZONING 14p9.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST +WEST ^/ A4.02 r APARTMEN DOUBLE DWELLING 392349U1 STREET EDINA. MN ARCHITECT: MAT [AS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 512E55JT45 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14D239 RE.TANING 14.09.10 RESUSMT KEY PLAN ELEVATIONS NORTH, SOUTH, EAST + WEST A4.03 DOUBLE DW ELLING 392349th STREET EDINA. MN ARCHITECT: MATHIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 612ASSZ745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY - MHM ISSUE 14.22. REZONING 14...10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN EXT. RENDERING LOOKING SOUTHWEST A4.03 DOUBLE DWELLING 3927 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MAT AS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55465 612455-3745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 14=2 REd H`NG 1465.16 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN EXT. RENDERING LOOKING SOUTHEAST A4.05 DOUBLE DWELLING 9923 49th STREET EDINA, MN ARCHITECT: MATXIAS MORTENSON 2429 SHERIDAN AVE. MINNEAPOLIS MN 55405 612 .655-3745 CONTRACTOR: DRAWN BY MHM ISSUE 144226 RE,20NNO 1446.10 RESUBMIT KEY PLAN EXT. RENDERING LOOKING NORTHEAST A4.06 o� e h 0 •'N�bRpppA�� • tees To: CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. D. From: James Hovland Action Mayor Discussion ❑ Date: February 17, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Appointments to Advisory Boards and Commissions Action Requested: Appoint the persons listed below. Information / Background: The City received applications for candidates to fill vacancies on its advisory boards and commissions. Applications were accepted through the 30th of January 2015. The City Council conducted interviews of applicants on February 9, 11 and 12, 2015. Members who were unable to meet the attendance requirement during 2014 were also interviewed on these dates with the intention of reappointment. The following people have been recommended for appointment or reappointment as noted below: New Appointments: Board or Commission Term Name Arts & Culture 3/1/18 Cheryl Gunness Arts & Culture 3/1/17 Daniel Li Board of Appeal & Equalization 3/1/16 Roger McVeety Community Health Commission 3/1/18 Britta Orr Construction Board of Appeals 3/1/18 Jennifer Carlson Energy and Environment 3/1/18 Melissa Seeley Energy and Environment 3/1/18 Lauren Satterlee Energy and Environment 3/1/18 Richard Manser Heritage Preservation Board 3/1/16 Karen Kelly Heritage Preservation Board 3/1/18 Colleen Pearson Human Rights & Relations 3/1/18 Tony Tian City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Human Rights & Relations 3/1/16 Jasna Burza Human Rights & Relations 3/1/17 Margaret Vecchio -Smith Park Board 311/17 Greg Good Park Board 3/1/17 Julie Strother Planning Commission 3/1/18 Todd Thorsen Planning Commission 3/1/18 Ian Nemerov Planning Commission 3/1/18 Jerry Strauss Transpiration Commission 3/1/18 Ralf Loeffelholz Reappointment: Board or Commission Term Name Board of Appeal & Equalization 3/1/16 Michael Friedberg Heritage Preservation Board 3/1/16 Michael Birdman The following people were selected as alternates in the case of an unscheduled vacancy. Alternates: Board or Commission Name Arts & Culture Commission Kathy Fredell Board of Appeals & Equalization Terry Korupp Community Health Commission Steve Sarles Construction Board of Appeals None Energy and Environment Dave Woodley Heritage Preservation Board Jay Halvorson Human Rights and Relations Sarah Rinn Park Board Koren Nelson Planning Commission Jimmy Bennett, Tom O'Connell Transportation Commission Chad Bell To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Ross Bintner, PE, Environmental Engineer Date: February 17, 2015 O CoayORP -V1 • 1888 Agenda Item #: VIII. E. The Recommended Bid is ❑ Within Budget 0 Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Authorize Award of Bid for Promenade Phase 4, Associated Professional Services, and Termination of Agreement Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 5, 2015 Company: Meisinger Construction Peterson Companies Sunram Construction Recommended Quote or Bid: Meisinger Construction General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: NA Amount of Quote or Bid: $1,268,550.00 $1,443,339.23 $1,532,970.00 $1,268,550.00 In addition to the Award of Bid for Promenade Phase 4, you are authorizing: 1. Engineering Services 2. Specialty Engineering Services 3. Termination of Cooperative Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Promenade Phase 4 (Engineering Contract ENG 14 -8, CIP item 15 -172) was bid on February 5. Costs came in 10% above the engineers estimate presented at the January 6 Council work session. Staff recommends award of the base bid to Meisinger Construction. The base bid includes natural rock for the sides of the pond and channel, with colored, stained and formed concrete for the channel and pond bottoms. Bid alternatives were included to give options for material type of the stream or pond bottom. Staff has reviewed the qualifications of Meisinger Construction and has determined that they are qualified to complete the project. They have project experience with the Met Council and City of Minneapolis, among others. Purchase agreement examples for Oxymoron by Stillman ($25,250) and Sand Hill Cranes by Dehne ($6,500) are attached and total $31,750. The only appropriate funding source is park dedication fees. Due to the bid coming in over budget, staff is not recommending purchase of public art with this project. Regional stormwater infiltration was removed from the project scope due to low level soil contamination issues and a confining clay layer in deep soil samples limiting infiltration. This portion of the project was City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Page 2 subject to a cooperative agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, attached is letter to terminate that agreement. Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF) grant funding has been approved for soil remediation and related specialty professional services. The County is finalizing the grant agreement. This item will come to Council at a future city council meeting. Two tables below describe total costs and funding sources. Funding sources are consistent with the CIP and January 5 Council work session numbers with the $119,513 overage split between park dedication and tax increment funding sources. CONSTUCTION PHASE COST Cost Recommended Funding Source: Water feature and public art nodes $465,261 7171 France park dedication fees HRA/Centennial Lakes TIF district Landscaping, public lighting, electric controls and irrigation. $389,342 Pedestrian walk, crossings, and associated grading and wall. $199,910 Stormwater, Soils remediation and disposal, wildlife habitat plantings. $202,469 Stormwater utility Hennepin County ERF Grant Cost Reimbursable by 71 France Agreement $11,568 71 France Developer SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION $1,268,550 TOTAL URS Inc. — Construction Professional Services $105,000 7171 France park dedication fees HRA/Centennial Lakes TIF district Barr Engineering - Specialty Professional Services (Soils and Habitat Planting) $36,800 Hennepin County ERF Grant Stormwater utility TOTAL $1,410,350 FUNDING BY SOURCE Funding Notes: Park Dedication $640,000 Eqv. To 128 Units @ $5000 each $60,000 over CIP -127 estimate Tax Increment Funds (TIF) / HRA $519,513 $59,513 over CIP -127 estimate Utility Fund — Storm $200,269 Classified as outside rate study Grants and Donations $39,000 Hennepin County ERF Grant Reimbursable to 71 France Developer $11,568 71 France Developer TOTAL $1,410,350 This request for purchase has an HRA companion item due to the HRA/TIF funding source. Attachment: • Engineering Services URS (Item #1) • Specialty Professional Services BARR (Item #2) • Termination of Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed (Item #3) • Example Public Art Work Purchase Agreements (Items #4,5) • Select Plan Sheets (Item 6) GAPMCENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS\2014 \ENG 14 -8 Promenade Phase 4\ADMIN \150217 RFP 14 -9 Promenade Phase 4.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 a February 2, 2015 Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: Promenade Phase 4 Professional Services Proposal for Construction Services Dear Chad, We are providing the following proposal for your consideration related to our recent discussions regarding the preparation of Final Construction documents and bidding services related to the construction of the Edina Promenade Phase 4 Improvements project in accordance to the Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services. Our proposed scope of work includes two components: additional design and bidding phase services related to the extension of the project schedule from 2014 construction to 2015 construction; Construction phase services to be provided as requested by City staff for site observation, shop drawing review, RFIs and potential design modifications. Proposed Scope of Work A, Additional Design Phase Services The original project scope envisioned a construction period in the summer of 2014 and a combined park and infiltration project. As a result of schedule changes for the 71 France project, the project construction was delayed until 2015. Another significant change included the removal of the infiltration project due to soil investigations that indicated contaminated soils. The soil investigation also required special provisions and quantities to help manage the contaminated soils that are expected to be encountered with the project. Through the summer and fall of 2014, URS staff met with the Edina Arts Committee to refine project elements in conjunction with input from the arts community. These discussions resulted in several modifications to the proposed plazas, channels, pond and landscape areas. B. Construction Phase Services We understand that the City may perform a significant amount of the on -site construction phase observation and inspection services which would reduce the amount of on -site inspector time associated with our proposed services. Our proposal includes estimated labor associated with performing complete on -site construction phase services although we understand that our on -site services will be performed only as requested by the City. Services associated with the construction phase of the project include on -site inspection, responses for Contractor questions, review of shop drawings, review of mock -ups, quantity verification, stakeholder coordination, plan modifications and as -built preparation. Fifth Street Towers • 100 South Fifth Street • Suite 1500 • Minneapolis, MN • 55402 • Phone: (612) 370 -0700 - Fax: (612) 370 -1378 10 � Proposed Fees Our proposed not -to- exceed budget is based upon the scope of services outlined above. We anticipate a separate proposal for professional services related to construction inspection and administration to be based upon the final construction documents. Actual fees will be billed on a time and expense basis. A. Additional Design Phase Services Project Manager (Greg Brown): Landscape Architect (Kathy Ryan): Senior CADD Technician Administrative: Subtotal professional labor 30 hours@ $175.00 /hr. _ $ 5,250.00 60 hours @ $120.00/hr.= $ 7,280.00 24 hours @ $135.00 /hr. _ $ 3,240.00 12 hours @ $90.00 /hr. = 1,080.00 $16,850.00 B. Construction Phase Services (as requested by City Staff) Project Manager (Greg Brown): 100 hours@ $175.00 /hr. _ $17,500.00 Landscape Architect (Kathy Ryan): 160 hours @ $120.00 /hr. _ $19,200.00 Senior CADD Technician 40 hours@ $135.00 /hr. _ $ 5,400.00 On -Site Inspector: 480 hours@ $90.00 /hr. _ $43,200.00 Administrative: 12 hours @$90.00/hr. _ $ 1,080.00 Subtotal professional labor $ 86,380.00 Expenses (mileage, printing, etc.) $1,770.00 Total proposed fees $105,000.00 Schedule The following is the proposed project schedule: Bid Date Feb 5, 2015 Construction Contract Award Feb 17, 2015 Begin Construction Apr 1, 2015 Complete Construction Sep 25, 2015 We are therefore requesting that the City of Edina authorize a scope of work for URS related to the above - referenced project for an amount not -to- exceed $105,000.00. We anticipate the scope of services to be complete by October 31, 2015. Fifth Street Towers • 100 South Fifth Street *Suite 1500 • Minneapolis, MN • 55407. •Phone: (612) 370 -0700 Fax: (612) 370 -3378 10 � We are pleased to continue our involvement with the Edina Promenade and look forward to continuing our working relationship with the City. If you should have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at 612- 373 -6479 or by e-mail at greiz.s.brown @urs.com. Sincerely, URS Corporation Gregor �/ `rown, PE Senior A�4 OCiate, Project Manager Michelle Julius Vice President This proposal is accepted by on the day of February, 2015. LIM Title: Fifth Street Towers • 100 South Fifth Street •Suite 1500 • Minneapolis, A4N .55402 • Plione: (612) 370 -0700 -Fax.* (612) 370 -1378 resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants February 6, 2015 Mr. Ross Bintner, P.E. Environmental Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Centennial Lakes Promenade Phase 4 Pond and Landscape Improvements Proposal for Remedial Action Plan Oversight and Vegetation Planting Oversight Dear Mr. Bintner: Barr Engineering (Barr) is pleased to provide the City with this proposal for environmental and ecological services related to the above - referenced project performed under Master Service Agreement dated December 9, 2103. Barr proposes to continue providing assistance to the City and URS in preparation for project bid evaluation and anticipate performing the following activities in conjunction with RAP implementation, as detailed in the attached cost estimate: Construction Oversight o Includes preparation of a project health and safety plan for Barr staff and safety coordination with the selected Contractor. o Includes attendance at weekly construction meetings to facilitate communication of schedule expectations o Includes two weeks of approximately half -time construction oversight and associated office staff support during field activities o Includes an assumed 7 soil samples for analysis of volatile organic compounds, semi - volatile organic compounds, diesel range organics, gasoline range organics, and the MPCA list of priority pollutant metals. Assumes a 5 -day turnaround from the lab. Reporting o Includes preparation of a Remedial Action Implementation Report, with information provided by URS (e.g., survey of volumes, weight tickets /manifests for disposal, etc.). o Includes one round of minor revisions by the City prior to submittal to MPCA Barr Engineering Co. 4700 West 77th Street, Suite 200, Minneapolis, MN 55435 952.832.2600 www.barr.com Mr. Ross Bintner February 6, 2015 Page 2 Planting Oversight o Includes coordination with planting subcontractor for schedule information o Includes two field days for oversight and instruction Project Management o Includes two meetings with City Staff for coordination o Includes routine project management and administration (client communications, invoicing, project recordkeeping, etc.) If this proposal is satisfactory, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter in the space provided. Thank you for the continued opportunity to assist the City of Edina. Please let me know if we can provide additional information in support of this proposal. Sincerely, Dan Fetter, P.E., Vice President (952)- 832 -2741 djf @barr.com enc. Cost Estimate Accepted this day of 2015 By Its - Proj. Mama: RAP Impleme —R Oremgnlaml Rappnmg DSenl Maim: city d Edina BAR R Dale: zwmts Apwwed bv: Dm FNier. P.E. me Wst Rnq er, oanid • Rut keumtariUaw Rmumenkl, Fatl m W —IM ninak OIB RRL eeplac Oan /RtlmM R�IIiry Rete Prgen Rde 51ss.m SaRS.m $IWID 51W.m Slmm Slfm.m $3p.W 5Wm bub3eW IAher 4 tentreeten 6eb Mjec1 Ted onpm Pntanea.cmn cpe.mmnm, Wne/s3wanoam3lwMZr1 or Emm, sou Re ulemn a 1 i a S m S lmm t 11M S D.SmID ptl 3 t a i S ;lmID S int awMa �sonrmraermmuen s a o o s zooms lamps � s vusm wedrycenevunkn rdeenne Rrtmdma a o o s 1290m s sm s s a,a05.m fkbonrel t.naoRk.w pert o x S e.se.W s Rm.m t m s ss,aznm i 5 IvnsW s zsssm s A,rOn00 S w�RAP rt ID S 5 s 44mm0U.ID W Pga m R 3SW s tend Aamldmeam 0 5 S ;am.m s nmW S 5 afW.m n iPre9ld. PnGnnautkn 4 4 i 3 S ;)mm S mm 5 S nieM1t nf�eb 5 S,Omm 3 aWW $ $ 5.3mm coerdVeeaen 3 1 S asOm 5 a5nm 0...4 c mOHkew SS 5 ;sm 'S. . S 5 s—1 D.aO S $ S Prolen subroui . 4=-=-I-- S ID S 4Sm.W S [aN e Pmpn Twice S umplon n RSSPMWImenammmmketlon elmNrmmemel wnwrne, arelt dens mdapnlllumne. _mn v.Meu nur- comic. a nywnrtl ., _ly ow.eke rm —mmapn. Pkt bd:PR mmtMSmry s t..wlo d.pp dovmnxrnen -ame cmmualm o w.IPt.ea eHia :upwrt P. nrj —geld; )o nrW,-- b— pmu.eppa0 Mkmenbnen reponisaraumedrob, Proauutl In moraneapn w /URS le.R. URSrgN Rpeeforenemd ®mm�, wrvry wlumn, weiPttktrnra algmel,ek.l lkk teM R.0.(eam.3. C11-1 ;fnmmw ;a I Inwlanx.nb ki, n —, DROry. flew nmplln� dudn)umpn(6 buMm3,OW SY;3persm n;elOC) Rminetlfw SW4 WC, OROw /Silk. Rel deenup; GAO. Pnaln P011unntedenlf:Sdee TAT mduen rooraln.cim wlM Plew ewbmnaecwr enao raP�orp.m permem P:\mpls \t3 mr. \ITnnl3as Eal�u cmnnnd W vd Rea VroiRktrNyni \eenn,eamn suPpat R.dxetWRAPTtan E.me.ro rw RRP impm,mteem.m xOss:kn.dem - S H E D D I S T - 12800 Gerard Dr • Eden Prairie, MN 55346 • 952- 835 -2078 • 952 - 835 -2079 (fax) • www.ninemilecreek.org January 20, 2015 Hon. James Hovland Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th St Edina MN 55424 Re: Termination of Centennial Lakes Volume - Control Project Mayor Hovland, In June, 2013, the City of Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District entered a cooperative agreement to study the feasibility of constructing a storm water management facility as part of the Centennial Lakes Promenade Phase 4 project to achieve mutual storm water - management goals. The feasibility study was completed in September, 2013. (A copy of the agreement is attached for reference.) Following the feasibility study, the City of Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District entered a second cooperative agreement in December, 2013, for the design, construction and operation of an underground irrigation and infiltration system, along with shallow gardens and rock channels, for integration into the Centennial Lakes Promenade recreational area. (A copy of the agreement is attached for reference.) Since then, staff from, both, the city and district have diligently pursued the project, but further analysis of site conditions has shown that the project location is not conducive to infiltration of storm water. As a result of the additional analysis, city and district staff have concluded that the best management of public resources requires the termination of the project in accordance with paragraph 6.9 of the second cooperative agreement. In accordance with the terms of both cooperative agreements, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District directed its engineer, Barr Engineering, to conduct the feasibility study, and to design and prepare necessary construction documents (drawings, technical specifications) for the project. In accordance with the first cooperative agreement, the district has incurred costs of $38,114.36 and pursuant to paragraph 5, page 2 of the cooperative agreement now requests reimbursement of 50 percent of these costs, or $19,057.18. Also, in accordance with the second cooperative agreement, the district has incurred design costs of $62,333.52, and pursuant to paragraphs 3.1 and 5.8 of the cooperative agreement now requests reimbursement of 50 percent of these costs, or $31,166.76. The total reimbursement of 50 percent of the feasibility study and 50 percent of the design costs being requested is $50,223.94. Board of Managers Steve Kloiber - Edina Corrine Lynch - Eden Prairie Louise Segreto - Edina Jodi Peterson - Bloomington Maressia Twele - Minnetonka My signature here and your countersignature below signify agreement of our two entities to the termination of the cooperative agreement pursuant to its terms. On the City of Edina's payment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in accordance with the calculation above and attachments the parties will have no further obligations to each other under the cooperative agreement and for the Centennial Lakes Promenade project. Please return a fully executed original to our administrator, Kevin Bigalke. On behalf of the Board of Managers, thank you for your continuing partnership. Sin rely, i Corrine Lynch, Presi nt Board of Managers, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Agreed: CITY OF EDINA MAYOR By: James Hovland Date: c/ City Manager, Ross Bintner, Kevin Bigalke CITY MANAGER By: Scott Neal Date: Kevin Biaalke From: Kurt Leuthold <KLeuthold @barr.com> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 2:01 PM To: Kevin Bigalke Cc: Kurt Leuthold; Janna Kieffer Subject: Centennial Lakes Fees Hi Kevin. Here is the summary of ou-r-fe-e-!a4aLthe Centennial Lakes Project: Phase 1 Fe Stu - $38,114.36 — COLn.4.c"x V1 A5:�ee,�.o� Desig - $62,333.52 Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Kurt Kurt Leuthold, LEED AP, PE Vice President Senior Civil Engineer Minneapolis office: 952.832.2859 cell: 612.751.3100 kleuthold @barr.com www.barr.com COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT Between the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan This Agreement is made by and between the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103D, and the City of Edina ( "Edina "), a statutory city of the State of Minnesota. Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS the NMCWD has an approved Water Resources Management Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 1038 that includes goals of managing stormwater flows on site and improving water quality in Nine Mile Creek; WHEREAS Edina has an approved Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan that includes goals of managing stormwater to provide flood protection and clean water services, a Wellhead Protection Plan that includes the goals of managing pollution risk to the aquifers that provide domestic water supply, and a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan that includes goals of reducing pollutant discharge to local water bodies; WHEREAS both the NMCWD and Edina pursue these goals through various programs including regulation of redevelopment and working with private property owners to incorporate innovative and effective stormwater management methods; WHEREAS the NMCWD and Edina wish to explore the potential for use of such methods within the Centennial Lakes watershed and in conjunction with certain expected redevelopment activity within that watershed; THEREFORE the NMCWD and Edina hereby enter into this legally binding agreement to undertake and jointly fund an engineering study for this purpose, according to the following terms. 1 AGREEMENT 1. The NMCWD will enter into a professional services agreement with Barr Engineering Company to perform the scope of services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein ( "Services'). 2. Edina will have input into the Services through the structured meetings and review opportunities stated in Exhibit A. In addition, Edina may communicate with the NMCWD at anytime regarding the Services. The NMCWD retains its discretion in directing the performance of the Services and administering the contract with Barr Engineering, subject to the approval of Edina, and'will incorporate Edina's input and both the NMCWD and Edina have to agree on the acceptance of Barr Engineering's report. Any written communication between either party and Barr Engineering will be copied to the other party. 3. The NMCWD and Edina will facilitate Barr Engineering's performance of the Services by all means within their reasonable administrative capacity. If Barr Engineering requires entry onto public or private property for the purpose of the Services, Edina will use its good offices to assist in securing any necessary permissions and the parties will coordinate to afford Barr Engineering the use of their legal authorities to enter, as necessary and as they judge legally sound. The final report will acknowledge financial support from both the NMCWD and Edina. 4. The NMCWD will provide for the professional services contract to identify Edina as an intended beneficiary of the Services; to extend duty of care, insurance and indemnification requirements to both the NMCWD and Edina; and to state that Edina and the NMCWD jointly share all rights to use of the final Barr Engineering report and any rights in the event of a breach of the contract by Barr Engineering. 5. Within 30 days of NMCWD invoicing, Edina will reimburse the NMCWD for one -half of amounts the NMCWD pays to Barr Engineering. for the Services, up to an aggregate total of $20,000. Edina will not withhold reimbursement to the NMCWD on the basis of dissatisfaction with the Services. If either party is dissatisfied with the Services, the parties will consult in good faith to resolve the dissatisfaction. 6. If the Services or the performance of this Agreement requires the sharing of data that is defined as not public under the Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes chapter 13 (DPA), the NMCWD and Edina will cooperate to preserve the ciassification of the data and otherwise conform to the DPA. If Edina receives a request for data pursuant to the DPA that may encompass data Edina possesses or has created as a result of this Agreement, it i7 will inform the NMCWD and transmit a copy of the request. If the request is addressed to the NMCWD, Edina will not provide any information or documents, but will direct the inquiry to the NMCWD. If the request is addressed to Edina, Edina will be responsible to determine whether it is legally required to respond to the request and otherwise what its legal obligations are, but will notify and consult with the NMCWD before replying. 7. The official representatives of the parties with respect to this Agreement are as follows: NMCWD: Administrator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Edina: Director of Engineering 8. The parties will use the product of the Services in good faith to explore stormwater volume. reduction opportunities, jointly and individually. However, nothing in this Agreement obligates either the NMCWD or Edina to any specific undertaking or any commitment of funds beyond the funding of the Services as set forth herein. 9. This Agreement is the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, between the parties respecting such matters. This Agreement may be amended only by a writing signed by both parties. This Agreement terminates on the completion of the Services and Edina's fulfillment of its reimbursement obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota By 6� 1,11 Its President Dated: t 2 - �/ 13 3 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION Dated: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION By City Attorney COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Promenade Phase 4 - Stormwater Management Project, Edina This cooperative agreement is made by and between the City of Edina (Edina), a Minnesota municipal corporation, and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD), a watershed district created pursuant to Minnesota Statutes chapters 103B and 103D, to achieve mutual stormwater- management goals through design, construction and operation of underground irrigation and infiltration capacity, along with shallow gardens and rock channels, all integrated into Edina's Centennial Lakes Promenade recreational area. Recitals and Statement of Purpose WHEREAS Edina has constructed, owns and operates the Centennial Lakes Promenade, a greenway with bike and walking paths that connects Centennial Lakes Park to nearby retail and residential areas and that lies within the Nine Mile Creek watershed. On November 19, 2013, the Edina City Council ordered the completion of a design for the addition of water amenities (a pond and brook), using water pumped from Centennial Lakes, to the Promenade (Promenade Phase 4), and the Promenade Phase 4 is to be implemented oil land owned by Edina in conjunction with the redevelopment of adjacent retail areas. WHEREAS NMCWD has an approved water resources management plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 10313.231, that has as a primary goal the improvement of water quality in the Nine Mile Creek watershed. WHEREAS Edina and NMCWD have together identified a need to improve stormwater runoff management in the Promenade Phase 4 area to achieve shared goals and contribute to Edina's compliance with Clean Water Act requirements included in its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. Edina and NMCWD have jointly supported the development of the Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan (October 2013), which outlines options for integrating improved stormwater runoff management systems into the Promenade Phase 4. WHEREAS Edina and NMCWD have examined the options analyzed in the Edina Centennial Lakes Runoff Volume Reduction Plan and have determined that the design, construction and operation of underground irrigation and infiltration systems, along with shallow gardens and rock channels (the Project), will provide cost - effective and productive runoff- volume management in the Promenade area. WHEREAS On November. 19, the Edina City Council by resolution requested that NMCWD participate in the development and construction of the Project, including but not limited to the contribution by NMCWD of 50 percent of the cost of the design, construction and major maintenance of the Project. November 20, 2013 Edina - NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 1 Cooperative Agreement WHEREAS NMCWD, by November 20, 2013, action of its Board of Managers, received the request for participation in the Project from Edina, recognized Edina's substantial contribution of the land -use rights necessary for the Project, and directed the NMCWD administrator to develop a cooperative agreement with Edina for the Project. WHEREAS NMCWD is amending its watershed management plan to include the Project as a capital improvement of the NMCWD. WHEREAS Edina and NMCWD are authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 471.59 to enter into the cooperative agreement. Now, therefore, IT IS AGREED by and between Edina and NMCWD that they enter into this agreement to document their understanding as to the scope of the Project, reaffirm their commitments as to the general responsibilities of and tasks to be undertaken by the parties, establish procedures for performing these tasks and carrying out these responsibilities, and facilitate communication and cooperation to successfully complete the Project. Organization and Relationship of the Parties 1.1 The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District administrator, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's professional consulting engineer (the NMCWD Engineer), a representative of Edina Public Works Department and a representative of the professional consulting engineer hired by Edina to design the Promenade Phase 4 (the Centennial Engineer) will constitute the Design Team for the Project, charged to conduct the day -to -day activities necessary to complete the Project and to serve as their respective parties' principal contacts for the Project. 1.2 Each party will use best efforts to coordinate and communicate informally, primarily through the Design Team, so that any issues may be timely addressed. Members of the Design Team will meet frequently to ensure the successful completion of the Project. 1.3 Within 90 days after this agreement takes effect, the Design Team will prepare a plan for public participation, communication and education. Activities under the plan will be carried out individually or together as the plan may specify. Design Team members may not commit to expenditures for public education plan implementation that otherwise require approval of their respective governing bodies unless and until such approval has been obtained. 2 Project. The Project is further defined and specified for purposes of this cooperative agreement and the parties' implementation thereof as consisting of the following: 2.1 Design and preparation of all necessary construction documents (drawings, technical specifications) for the Project, in accordance with the NMCWD Engineer's November 12, 2013, professional services proposal and the conceptual drawing of the Project (both attached to and incorporated into this agreement as Exhibit A). The design will also include services provided by the NMCWD Engineer to coordinate integration of the Project into the package of bid and contract documents prepared by the Centennial Engineer for Promenade Phase 4. November 20, 2013 Edina -NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 2 Cooperative Agreement 2.2 Construction of the Project by a contractor selected by Edina in accordance with Minnesota procurement law, under contract with Edina and in conjunction with the construction of Promenade Phase 4. 2.3 Development by the NMCWD Engineer and implementation by Edina of a plan for the post - construction maintenance and operation of the Project (the Maintenance Plan). The Maintenance Plan also will identify specific performance- monitoring protocols and reporting to be completed, and delineate major and routine maintenance and repair of the Project. 3 Cost- and Credit - Sharing 3.1 NMCWD and Edina each will contribute 50 percent of the costs of the Project and of major repair and maintenance of the Project, as described in the Maintenance Plan. The Design Team will develop the protocols and procedures necessary to facilitate reimbursement for Project costs as provided by this agreement. Each party will pay the internal and incidental costs of its participation in the Project not otherwise specified as subject to cost - sharing as specified in herein. 3.2 NMCWD and Edina will share credit for stormwater-management'capacity of the Project in proportion with the party's contribution toward the costs of the Project. Available credit will be determined on completion of the Project and annually in accordance with the monitoring results produced through implementation of the Maintenance Plan. Edina must first dedicate stormwater - management capacity credit from its allocation determined in accordance with this agreement to compliance with any requirements applicable under the NMCWD rules to the Promenade Phase 4. 4 Specific duties — NMCWD 4.1 NMCWD timely will amend the capital improvements program in its water resources management plan to include the Project in accordance with' Minnesota Statutes section 103B.231, and order the Project in accordance with Minnesota Statutes section 103B.251. 4.2 NMCWD will contract the NMCWD Engineer for the development of a design for the Project and the plans and specifications necessary to integrate the Project into the bidding/contract documents prepared by the Centennial Engineer for Promenade Phase 4. The contract for the design, plans and specifications will require the NMCWD Engineer to sign the Project plans and specifications, and require that the NMCWD Engineer's warranty of due professional care extend to both the NMCWD and Edina. The contract will require the NMCWD Engineer to provide 90 percent plans and specifications for the Project for approval by Edina and NMCWD on or before March 28, 2014. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD will make no warranty to Edina regarding the NMCWD Engineer's or another third party's performance in design, construction or construction management for the Project. NMCWD is responsible to make payments to the NMCWD Engineer in accordance with the terms of contract for the design, plans and specifications for the Project. November 20, 2013 Edina - NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 3 Cooperative Agreement 4.3 NMCWD will approve or reject the plans and specifications for the Project and for incorporation into the Promenade Phase 4 bidding/contract documents within 15 business days of receipt from the NMCWD Engineer. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. 4.4 NMCWD will cooperate with and assist Edina in obtaining permits for Promenade Phase 4, including but not limited to ensuring that the plans and specifications for the Project comport with NMCWD regulatory requirements. 4.5 NMCWD will approve or disapprove issuance of a notice of contract award by Edina for Promenade Phase 4 including the Project within 15 days of bid opening, unless the parties agree otherwise. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. If NMCWD disapproves of issuance of a notice of award by Edina for Promenade Phase 4 with the Project included, this agreement will terminate immediately and the parties will have no further obligations hereunder. In particular, Edina will be released from its obligation to contribute to the costs of development of the design, plans and specifications for the Project, as described in paragraphs 2.1 and 4.2 of this agreement and NMCWD will reimburse Edina for any reimbursement already 'received at the time of termination. 4.6 NMCWD timely will approve or disapprove any change orders for construction of the Project, within 30 days of notification of the need for the change order by the Centennial Engineer. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. 4.7 NMCWD will reimburse Edina in accordance with sections 2 and 3 of this agreement for expenditures made for the construction of the Project in accordance with paragraphs 5.3, 5.4, 5.6 and 5.7and for major maintenance and repair of the Project as defined in and in accordance with the Maintenance Plan. 4.8 NMCWD will contract with the NMCWD Engineer for the development of the Maintenance Plan. The contract for the Maintenance Plan will require the NMCWD Engineer to provide the Maintenance Plan for approval by Edina and NMCWD within 1 year of certification by a qualified engineer of the as -built construction drawings of the Project; such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. NMCWD is responsible to make payments to the NMCWD Engineer in accordance with the terms of contract for the Maintenance Plan for the Project. 5 Specific duties — Edina 5.1 Edina owns or will timely acquire all land -use rights necessary for the Project, and will own all Project elements at completion of construction. 5.2 Edina will approve or reject the plans and specifications for the Project for incorporation into the Promenade Phase 4 bidding/contract documents within 15 business days of receipt from the NMCWD Engineer. Failure to timely act will constitute approval. Approval will not be unreasonably withheld. 5.3 Edina will direct the Centennial Engineer to integrate the design, plans and specifications for the Project into the bidding/contract documents for Promenade Phase 4 in a manner that November 20, 2013 Edina -NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 4 Cooperative Agreement delineates costs of the Project separate from other costs of construction of Promenade Phase 4 for purposes of cost accounting. 5.4 Edina will obtain all permits and approvals necessary for the Project, except that NMCWD will ensure that the Project comports with NMCWD regulatory requirements. 5.5 Edina will solicit sealed bids for Promenade Phase 4, including the Project, in accordance with Minnesota municipal procurement law. 5.6 If the bids are acceptable to Edina and the NMCWD, Edina will contract for the construction of Promenade Phase 4 with the lowest qualified responsible and responsive bidder, as determined by Edina in consultation with NMCWD. Edina will award and enter a contract for the construction of Promenade Phase 4, and such contract will: a. Require the selected contractor to indemnify, defend and hold harmless NMCWD, its officers, board members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature arising from the contractor's negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty, or a subcontractor's negligent or otherwise wrongful act or omission, or breach of a specific contractual duty owed by the contractor to Edina. The contract will require that any claim subject to indemnification by an employee of selected contractor or a subcontractor, the indemnification obligation is not limited by a limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or for the contractor or a subcontractor under workers' compensation acts, disability acts or other employee benefit acts. b. Require that the contractor name NMCWD an additional insured with primary coverage for general liability on a noncontributory basis for both ongoing work and completed operations to the extent of NMCWD's statutory liability limit. C. Require that within 60 days of certified completion of construction of Promenade Phase 4, the selected contractor provide certified as -built construction documents to NMCWD. 5.7 Edina is responsible to make payments to the contractor in accordance with the terms of contract for construction of Promenade Phase 4. 5.8 Edina will reimburse NMCWD in accordance with sections 2 and 3 of this agreement for expenditures made in accordance with paragraphs 4.2 and 4.8. 5.9 Edina will approve or reject the Maintenance Plan within 45 days of receipt from the NMCWD Engineer, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. Failure by Edina to timely act on its rights and obligations under this paragraph will constitute approval of the Maintenance Plan. If Edina disapproves the Maintenance Plan, this agreement is terminated and all maintenance requirements for the Project to assure that it will continue to effectively function as designed will become the sole responsibility of Edina. On approval of the Maintenance Plan, Edina will perform all routine maintenance and monitoring of the Project, along with reporting as required by the Maintenance Plan. November 20, 2013 Edina -NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 5 Cooperative Agreement 6 General Terms 6.1 INDEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP; LIABILITY. This agreement does not create a joint powers board or organization within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes section 471.59, and neither party agrees to be responsible for the acts or omissions of the other pursuant to subdivision 1(a) of the statute. Only contractual remedies are available for the failure of a party to fulfill the terms of this agreement. Edina and NMCWD enter this agreement solely for the purposes of enhancing stormwater management capacity in the Centennial Lakes subwatershed of the Nine Mile Creek watershed in Edina. Accordingly, with respect to any and all activity undertaken pursuant to this agreement, Edina and NMCWD will each hold harmless, defend and indemnify the other, its officers, employees and agents for all claims, damages, liabilities, losses and expenses asserted against the other party at any time by any third party, including any governmental body. Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of this agreement, Edina's and NMCWD's obligations under this paragraph will survive the termination of the agreement. This agreement creates no right in and waives no immunity, defense or liability limitation with respect to any third party. As between the Parties, only contract remedies are available for a breach of this agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, NMCWD will not be deemed to have acquired by entry into or performance under this agreement, any form of interest or ownership in or to any portion of the land that is the site of the construction of the Project or adjacent property. NMCWD will not by entry into or performance under this agreement be deemed to have exercised any form of control over the use, operation or management of any portion of the property that is the site of the Project or adjacent property so as to render NMCWD a potentially responsible party for any contamination under state and /or federal law. 6.2 PUBLICITY AND ENDORSEMENT. Any publicity regarding the Project must identify Edina and NMCWD as the sponsoring entities. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for Edina or NMCWD individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the Project. NMCWD and Edina will collaborate on the development of educational and informational signage pertinent to the Project, and each party, at its cost, may develop, produce and, after approval of the other party, distribute educational, outreach and publicity materials related to the Project. 6.3 DATA MANAGEMENT. All designs, written materials, technical data, research or any other work -in- progress will be shared between the parties to this agreement on request, except as prohibited by law. As soon as is practicable, the party preparing plans, specifications, contractual documents, materials for public communication or education will provide them to the other party for recordkeeping and other necessary purposes. 6.4 Data Practices. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, any other applicable state 'statute, or any state rules adopted to implement the act, as well as federal regulations on data privacy November 20, 2013 Edina - NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 6 Cooperative Agreement 6.5 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This agreement contains the complete and entire agreement between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements, representations and understandings, if any, between the parties respecting such matters. The recitals stated at the outset are incorporated into and a part of the agreement. 6.6 COMPLETE AGREEMENT. This agreement, as it may be amended in writing, constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties. Any amendment to this agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original agreement or their successors in office. 6.7 WAIVERS. The waiver by Edina or NMCWD of any breach or failure to' comply with any provision of this agreement by the other party will not be construed as nor will it constitute a continuing waiver of such provision or a waiver of any other breach of or failure to comply with any other provision of this agreement. 6.8 NOTICES. Any notice, demand or communication under this agreement by either party to the other will be deemed to be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid to: Edina NMCWD Ross Bintner Kevin Bigalke, Administrator 7450 Metro Blvd 7710 Computer Blvd. Edina, MN 55379 Edina, MN 55435 952- 903 -5713 952- 835 -2078 6.9 TERM; TERMINATION. This agreement is effective on execution by both parties and will terminate three years from the date of execution of the latest amendment hereto or on the written agreement of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the agreement to be duly executed intending to be bounded thereby. (Signature page follows.) November 20, 2013 Edina -NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 7 Cooperative Agreement CITY OF EDIN MAYOR Title: Date: l �/ NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By :� y e Title: Date: ( 6-7 Approved as to for, c� executio C MA AGER District couns 1 B Title: Date: Approved as to for & execution: City attorney November 20, 2013 Edina -NMCWD Centennial Lakes Promenade Runoff Volume Management Project 8 Cooperative Agreement RESOLUTION 2013 -113 REQUESTING PARTICIPATION OF THE NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT TO INTEGRATE STORMWATER-MANAGEM ENT FEATURES INTO EDINA PROMENADE PROJECT WHEREAS the City of Edina has developed concept plans for the final phase of the Edina Promenade, consisting of a walking path and water feature; and WHEREAS the City and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have jointly undertaken analysis of the feasibility of integrating a stormwater- management system into the construction of the Promenade final phase to reduce stormwater runoff volume from the Centennial Lakes subwatershed (the Project), and have received and reviewed the final report on the Project, presenting implementation options; and WHEREAS the City of Edina finds that the study presents potentially cost - effective options for implementing the Project that would complement the design of the Promenade and its purpose of providing citizens with a multifaceted recreational amenity; and WHEREAS the City finds that the study supports further collaboration with the District to develop a complete design for integration of runoff volume reduction features into the final phase Promenade construction for the City's and District's approval; and WHEREAS the City finds that effective realization of the opportunity to improve present stormwater management in the Centennial Lakes subwatershed and create capacity for long -term benefit to the health of water resources in the city and Nine Mile Creek watershed requires the expertise and involvement of the District, and will be best facilitated by the City and District jointly funding the development and construction of the Project; and WHEREAS the District has conveyed to the City that after reviewing the study, the District Board of Managers recommends developing a design for the Project that includes underground irrigation and infiltration capacity, along with shallow gardens and rock channels; and NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina requests that the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District contribute 50 percent of the cost of development of a design and construction of the Project; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff are directed to work with District staff to develop a cooperative agreement for the Project for the approval of the parties' governing bodies, setting forth fu her terms for completion of a design including underground irrigation and infiltration capacity, along with shallow gar ens and rock channels, as well as the integration of the plans and specifications for the Project into construction docu W nts for the final phase Promenade, construction of the Project, and sharing of runoff - management capacity creaM and long -term maintenance of the Project. ADOPTED this 19" day of Nov4er, 3. i 1 ! Atte st: Debra A. Mangen James B. Hovland, Mayor G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \STS401 ProENGINEERIDNGRDEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevar� . ina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 826 -0371 9 Fax 952- 826 -0392 Resolution No. 2013 -113 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 2013, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19_T day of C tI 20 / L ty Clerk r,: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \,TS401 Promenc.de Phase 4 \ADMIN \Res. Nu. 2013 -113 CITY OF EDINA ARTWORK PURCHASE AGREEMENT The City of Edina, whose address is 4801 West 50`h Street, Edina, MN 55424 ( "City "), and Bruce Stillman, a sculptor whose address is 7110 County Road Ext., Minnetrista, MN 55364 ( "Artist "), hereby agree to a purchase of art, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) Artist shall sell to City a sculpture entitled Oxymoron ( "the Sculpture ") with a purchase price of $25,000 for permanent exhibition at the new Phase IV Expansion of the Edina Promenade ( "the Park ") in Centennial Lakes Park in the City of Edina. 2) Artist shall deliver the Sculpture undamaged with City Staff present between June and October 2015 with a delivery price of $250 on the sculpture pad and location in the Park designated by City. 3) Artist, City Staff and General Contractor will coordinate creation of foundation and the means necessary to secure the Sculpture as a permanent work of art on the Edina Promenade. 4) Artist, City Staff, and General Contractor will coordinate date, time, and location of delivery and installation of Sculpture. 5) Upon delivery and installation of the Sculpture in a secure manner, and no later than November 15, 2015, City shall pay Artist the purchase and delivery price of $25,250 for the sculpture. 6) Artist shall provide to City Staff a maintenance plan for upkeep and repair of Sculpture upon delivery of Sculpture. 7) Artists grants to City and the Edina Community Foundation an irrevocable license to graphically portray the Sculpture in or on photographs, publications and other written materials and electronic media . designed to promote the City of Edina, the Edina Community Foundation, or any group or event deemed appropriate by other licensees. Artist shall be credited as the artist in those depictions. 8) Upon completion of purchase, the City shall be responsible for maintenance of the Sculpture and for maintaining any desired insurance coverage for loss or damage to the Sculpture during the exhibition period, with the understanding that City will not be providing any extra security for the Park and does not have any applicable casualty insurance covering the Sculpture. THIS AGREEMENT is approved by the parties as of February 2015 CITY OF EDINA ARTIST Scott Neal, City Manager Artist Name — Bruce Stillman ; Nft��RT xvw.ECmaMCedll. Attachments: 1) Photo of Sculpture 2) Description of Sculpture . t x 4 "Oxymoron" by Bruce Stillman Stainless Steel and Granite Kinetic Sculpture Size: 12'Hx8'Wx4'D Weight: 9,000 lbs. 2012 Sculptor Bruce Stillman Born 1958 1976 to 1977 Northern Illinois University, continuing education by taking extension classes at the University of Minnesota and the Minneapolis College of Art and design. Developed the 310 studios art building for artists starting in 1982 to 2010, then moved all operations and art studio to the Big Stone minigolf and sculpture garden site situated on 17 acres in minnetrista. I Started sculpting in high school at the age of 15, after getting my drivers license as soon as I was 16 years old, I signed up and traveled to many art fairs in the summer of 1974, within a couple of years I started making kinetic sculptures, and sold them at art fairs. Over the years I have developed my style and craftsmanship, and moved into showing and selling my works in many galleries located all around the country, in such areas such as Vail and Aspen Colorado , Sedona Arizona, Palm desert California, Santa Fe New Mexico, Des Moines Iowa, Dallas Texas. For many years until present, I continue to develop my kinetic sculptures style. They are collected in numerous Corporation and private collections throughout the US and other countries. Over more recent years I've expanded my art work into stone carving and landscape constructions. presently continue to develop Big Stone mini golf and sculpture gardens in minnetrista, Minnesota, where I use my landscape designs to create a unique miniature golf course, surrounded by the Big Stone sculpture park and garden open to the public during the summer. CITY OF EDINA ART WORK PURCHASE AGREEMENT The City of Edina, whose address is 4801 West 50`h Street, Edina, MN 55424 ( "City "), and Jim Dehne, a sculptor whose address is 10606 Centerville Road., Newton, W153063 ( "Artist "), hereby agree to a purchase of art, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1) Artist shall sell to City a sculpture entitled Dancing Sand Hill Cranes ( "the Sculpture ") with a purchase price of $6,500 for permanent exhibition at the new Phase IV Expansion of the Edina Promenade ( "the Park ") in Centennial Lakes Park in the City of Edina. 2) Artist shall deliver the Sculpture undamaged with City Staff present between June and October 2015 with no delivery fee to the sculpture pad and location in the Park designated by City. Artist and City Staff will coordinate move of Sculpture from the 501h & France Business District to the Edina Promenade. 3) Artist, City Staff and General Contractor will coordinate creation of foundation and the means necessary to secure the Sculpture as a permanent work of art on the Edina Promenade. 4) Artist, City Staff, and General Contractor will coordinate date, time, and location of delivery and installation of Sculpture. 5) Upon delivery and installation of the Sculpture in a secure manner, and no later than November 15, 2015, City shall pay Artist the purchase and delivery price of $6,500 for the sculpture. 6) Artist shall provide to City Staff a maintenance plan for upkeep and repair of Sculpture upon delivery of Sculpture. 7) Artists grants to City and the Edina Community Foundation an irrevocable license to graphically portray the Sculpture in or on photographs, publications and other written materials and electronic media designed to promote the City of Edina, the Edina Community Foundation, or any group or event deemed appropriate by other licensees. Artist shall be credited as the artist in those depictions. 8) Upon completion of purchase, the City shall be responsible for maintenance of the Sculpture and for maintaining any desired insurance coverage for loss or damage to the Sculpture during the exhibition period, with the understanding that City will not be providing any extra security for the Park and does not have any applicable casualty insurance covering the Sculpture. THIS AGREEMENT is approved by the parties as of February , 2015 CITY OF EDINA Scott Neal, City Manager �.Nr.A� o e 4 w O i ARTIST Artist Name —Jim Dehne 1� Attachments: 1) Photo of Sculpture 2) Description of Sculpture Dancing Sand Hill Cranes Jim Dehne 3 pieces - Iron 4%'to6'H and 2'to3'W 40 lbs. each Edina Public Art Iron Art of Jim Dehne Newton, Wisconsin idehnebci @gmail.com 920 - 901 -1630 www.ptcreek.com Outdoor and indoor sculptures include horses, herons, cranes, flower stands, wildlife, arches, garden furniture, butterflies, and dragonflies. The last several years Jim has been showing mainly at horse shows including large horse shows in Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, Arizona, Texas, and Colorado. Various sizes of iron rod are curved, twisted, and hand welded. Pieces are made from iron rods that are painted black with copper paint highlights. Jim Dehne draws his inspiration from the wildlife and flora of the Wisconsin countryside where he has lived as well as the nature he observed while living and traveling across the country. Jim was born and raised on a dairy farm named Point Creek Farm in Newton, Wisconsin. After high school, Jim went into the Army, served in Alaska for three years, and stayed an additional four years enjoying living and exploring in the Great Northwest. He encountered moose, mushed with sled dogs, and saw herds of caribou. Jim came back to the lower 48 and attended college in Iowa studying biology. After college, he returned to the beauty of the Wisconsin countryside and took over the family farm. Jim later moved into raising flowers in greenhouses and working with floral design and arrangement at a flower shop. He began sculpting with some small pieces including butterflies and dragonflies at garden shows in Manitowoc, Wisconsin. He continued with the natural and floral, capturing the living feeling of nature and wildlife with lightly curving and twisting iron. Pieces present the feeling of soft metal and movement. Bending iron to whatever need was at hand allows Jim to sculpt iron into the feathery wings of a heron or the dancing wings of a dragonfly.