HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-04-07 City Council MeetingREVISED AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
• CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY APRIL 7, 2015
7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA
All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless
requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council.
In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered
immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of
majority of Council Members present to approve.)
A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of March 1 7, 2015 and, Work Session Of
March 17, 2015
B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 03/19/2015 TOTAL:
• $884,056.09 And Per Pre -List Dated 03/26/2015 TOTAL: $624,296.92 and Per
Pre -List Dated 04/02/2015 TOTAL: $616,671.04 and Credit Card Transactions
12/26/2014 — 01/25/2015 TOTAL: $38,307.12
C. Fire Department Medical Control And Direction Agreement
D. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid Contract ENG 15 -1 Valley View Road
Improvements
E. 7101 France Avenue, Rue de France Easement Settlement, Hazelton Road
Improvements BA -417
F. Promenade Phase 4 Funding Update
G. Resolution No. 2015 -31 Authorizing Acceptance of Grant DWI Enforcement
H. Request For Purchase — DWI Enforcement Vehicle, Police Department
I. Resolution No. 2015 -34 Supporting Application For Hennepin County 2015
Sidewalk Participation Program
J. Consider Adoption Of Revised Data Practices Policy
K. 7200 France Avenue Extension From Action
L. HRRC Resignation & Appointment
M. Resolution No. 2015 -36 Setting Public Hearing For May 6, 2015 For Living Street
Plan
. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Safe Digging Month In Minnesota Proclamation
B. Public Health Week Proclamation
Agenda
April 7, 2015
Page 2
• C. Earth Day Proclamation
D. Item Removed
E. National Public Safety Telecom municators Week -
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members
make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long
as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow
the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as
deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and
limit testimony to the matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs,
clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not
allowed.
A. PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Adoption of
Small Area Plan For Wooddale Valley View, Resolution No. 2015 -32 (Favorable roll
call vote of four Council Members to approve)
VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new
• issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or
which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to
three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the
interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's
agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not
expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the
Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present
to approve except where noted)
A. 50th & France Business Association Permit To Use City Property In Conjunction
With the Service Of Alcohol
B. Grandview Former Public Works Site, Discovery Phase Update
C. Resolution No. 2015 -33 Municipal State Aid Routes Designation Changes
D. Resolution No. 2015 -35 Accepting Donations & Grants
E. Student Board And Commission Member On- Boarding
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
A. Correspondence
B. Minutes:
is1. Energy & Environment Commission February 12, 2015
2. Veteran's Memorial Committee, February 27, 2015
3. Transportation Commission, February 19, 2015
Agenda
April 7, 2015
Page 3
4. Human Rights & Relations, March 24, 2015
X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE
XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS
XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS
A. Report On Chicagoland Field Trip
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA — February 17, 2015
V. 7101 FRANCE AVENUE, RUE DE FRANCE EASEMENT SETTLEMENT, HAZELTON
ROAD IMPROVEMENTS BA -417
VI. ADJOURNMENT
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance
in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-
927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting.
II
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS
�I
Tues
Apr 7
Work Session - City Funding For 66 West
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Joint Meeting with Energy & Environment Commission
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Apr 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Apr 14
VISION Edina Open House
5:00 P.M.
CITY HALL LOBBY
Mon
Apr 20
Annual Boards & Commissions Dinner
5:30 P.M.
CENTENNIAL LAKES
Tues
Apr 21
Work Session — Vision Edina/2016 -17 Proposed Work Plan /Business Meeting
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
Apr 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Wed
Apr 29
Volunteer Recognition Dinner
5:30 P.M.
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
Tues
May 5
SPECIAL ELECTIONS — POLLS OPEN AT 7:00 A.M.
Wed
May 6
Work Session — Park Strategic Plan Drive
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
W
Wed
May 6
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
May 19
Work Session — Grandview Development Alternatives
5:30 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
May 19
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 25
MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed
s
June 2
Work Session — Parking & Future of City Owned Properties 50th & France
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITYROOM
&
Affordable Housing
6:15 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
June 2
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
June 16
Work Session —joint Meeting with Edina Transportation Commission
5:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Joint Meeting with Bike Edina
6:00 P.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues
June 16
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
• EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 17, 2015
7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
11. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland.
111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED
Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the meeting
agenda.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent
agenda as revised to remove Item IV.C. Resolution No. 2015 -12 Amending the 2014 Budget,
as follows:
M.A. Approve regular, work session, and closed meeting minutes of March 3, 2015
IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated March 5, 2015, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $204,808.42;
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $201.22; Working Capital Fund $459,306.02;
•
Equipment Replacement Fund $7,685.52; Art Center Fund $2,995.86; Golf Dome
Fund $7,512.16; Aquatic Center Fund $450.00; Golf Course Fund $25,437.32; Ice
Arena Fund $39,398.83; Sports Dome Fund $21,123.26; Edinborough Park Fund
$10,442.24; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $7,586.21; Liquor Fund $127,671.61; Utility
Fund $36,632.13; PSTF Agency Fund $2,054.92; TOTAL $953,305.72 and for receipt of
payment of claims dated March 12, 2015, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund
$657,244.27; Police Special Revenue $212.23; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund
$137.35; Working Capital Fund $129,732.28; Equipment Replacement Fund
$26,196.80; Art Center Fund $1,938.88; Golf Dome Fund $16,519.60; Aquatic Center
Fund $1,118.1 1; Golf Course Fund $100,072.36; Ice Arena Fund $46,858.42; Sports
Dome Fund $302.75; Edinborough Park Fund $7,660.72; Centennial Lakes Park Fund
$2,447.67; Liquor Fund $193,522.70; Utility Fund $418,086.95; Storm Sewer Fund
$677.21; PSTF Agency Fund $16,581.73; TOTAL $1,619,310.03
Resolutfon No. 201 Amending
M.C.
IV.D.
S-12 the 2014 Budget
Request for Purchase, 50 Meter Pool Painting for Edina Aquatic Center, awarding the
bid to the recommended low bidder, Horizon Commercial Pool Supply at $39,740.00
IV.E.
Request for Purchase, Award of Bid Contract ENG 15 -4 Countryside H Neighborhood
Roadway Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder
Northwest Asphault Inc. at $3,039,075.03
IV.F.
Request for Purchase, Award of Bid Contract ENG 15 -5 Prospect Knolls B and Dewey
Hill G Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended
low bidder, Northwest Asphault Inc. at $1,490,241.41
IV.G.
Request for Purchase, Authorize Engineering Services for Tracy Avenue - Preliminary
Engineering, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, WSB Inc. at $39,500.00
• IV.H.
Approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 4, 2015
IV.I.
Request for Purchase, Generator Load Bank Tester - Public Works, awarding the bid
to the recommended low bidder, Loadtec at $41,391.74
Page 1
Minutes /Edina City Council /March 17, 2015
IV.J. Request for Purchase, Four 2015 Prius C Staff Vehicles — Inspections Division,
awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Houston - Galveston Area Council Buy •
at $79,872.00
IV.K. Request for Purchase, Fire Station I Duct Insulation, awarding the bid to the
recommended bidder, Gagnon Inc. at $19,850.00
IV.L. Request for Purchase, SCADA Radio Upgrade, awarding the bid to the recommended
low bidder, D2 Services at $28,515.00
IV.M. Approve Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Intent to Franchise
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA
IV.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -12 AMENDING THE 2014 BUDGET — ADOPTED
Manager Neal explained that the budget established for 2014 and 2015 was adopted by the Council on
December 17, 2013. The 2014 Budget planned for $1,800,100 of cash profits transfers out of the Liquor
Fund and into other City funds. Staff estimated that revenues would be about 4% under budget due to
new competitors and recommended that Council amend the 2014 Budget to cancel a planned transfer of
cash from the Liquor Fund to the General Fund in the amount of $765,100. The amendment would not
affect the remaining transfers from the Liquor Fund to the Construction Fund, Golf Fund, Arena Fund, and
Art Center Fund. Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -12,
Amending the Budget for the City of Edina for the Year 2014. Member Swenson seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS •
V.A. FEBRUARY SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC. DRIVE THRUS
Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of February opinions, both pros and cons,
collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to drive thrus. Mr. Gilgenbach answered a question of the
Council indicating that the current Speak Up topic related to street lighting.
V.B. PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT UPDATE — PRESENTED
Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development, updated the Council on the Pentagon Park project and presented
a video of the site, firefighter training, and demolition.
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
VI.A. PRELIMINARY PLAT, BLAKE WOODS, 5321 AND 5331 EVANSWOOD LANE AND 5320
AND 5324 BLAKE ROAD, FRANK BERMAN — CONTINUED TO APRIL 21, 2015
Community Development Director Presentation
Community Development Director Teague presented the request from Frank Berman to combine and
subdivide four properties at 5321 and 5331 Evanswood Lane and 5320 and 5324 Blake Road into seven
lots. Mr. Teague indicated the project was still under consideration by the Planning Commission and staff
recommended continuing the Public Hearing to April 21, 2015 to allow time for the Planning Commission
to consider the proposed Plat.
Mr. Teague answered a question of the Council relating to the 120 -day rule. Member Swenson made
a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to continue the Public Hearing to April 21, 2015.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VI.B. APPEAL OF UTILITY SHUT -OFF, WALDORF NEVENS — REVISED STIPULATION FOR •
ADEQUATE ASSURANCE OF PAYMENT APPROVED
Finance Director Presentation
Page 2
Minutes /Edina City Council /March 17, 2015
Finance Director Roggeman presented a Stipulation for Adequate Assurance of Payment that was
• negotiated with the debtor, Waldorf Nevens. The debtor, located at 7075/7079 Amundson Avenue, filed
for Chapter I I Bankruptcy on January 9, 2015. Mr. Roggeman informed the Council that the pre -
bankruptcy account status was not relevant to the agreement. The agreement was to secure adequate
assurance that the debtor would continue to pay the City for usage while the bankruptcy case proceeded.
The Council asked questions relating to the billing period, options if the bankruptcy judge did not approve
the agreement, and the number of employees at the location. The Council added Item 16., "The
agreement is conditioned upon the approval by the bankruptcy court of this stipulation for adequate
assurance of payment."
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:56 p.m.
Public Testimony
No one appeared to comment.
Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving the Stipulation
for Adequate Assurance of Payment, as revised to add Item 16, The agreement is
conditioned upon the approval by the bankruptcy court of this stipulation for adequate
assurance of payment.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
• VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT
No one appeared to comment.
Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS
VIII.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -02 AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CODE CONCERNING
HONEY BEEKEEPING 1 — ADOPTED
Dianne Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, shared that the Council had previously endorsed the
proposal to amend the City Code to enable residents to maintain honeybee apiaries. The Council
requested a policy be drafted that would regulate the registration and revocation process. There were
two registration revocation policies for the Council to consider. The original and a second revised policy
written by Manager Neal. The key difference between the policies was whether a general bee allergy or a
specific honeybee allergy were grounds for revocation.
The Council noted that First Reading of Ordinance No. 2015 -02 had been granted at the January 20, 2015,
Council meeting. Member Swenson made a motion to grant Second Reading adopting
Ordinance No. 2015 -02, Amending Chapter 8 of the Edina City Code Regarding Honey
Beekeeping. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
The Council discussed whether it needed to vote on the Registration Revocation policy or to allow staff to
enforce and update it as needed. The Council agreed amend the motion and revise Ordinance
No. 2015 -02 to add Item 8 -316 (c) " In considering requests for denial, suspension revocation,
the City Manager shall consider the public health safety and welfare issues and base his
decision on criteria included in policies adopted and adjusted from time to time."
• Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.B. APIARY REGISTRATION REVOCATION POLICY— DISCUSSED
Page 3
Minutes /Edina City Council /March 17, 2015
The Council discussed the two Apiary Registration Revocation Policies and decided to take no action on a
formal policy. •
VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -05 AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF THE CODE REGARDING FOWL
— ADOPTED
Ms. Latham shared that that this item was presented to the Council on January 20, 2015, as a single
ordinance that dealt with bees and chicken keeping. The Council referred the section relating to chickens
to the Energy and Environment Commission for further study to address humane treatment and animal
cruelty. Ms. Latham discussed a -mails concerning best practices for keeping hens from a concerned
citizen. She explained that humane treatment and animal cruelty were covered by Minnesota State
Statutes and did not need to be included in the City's ordinance.
Ms. Latham answered a question of the Council relating to the total number of hens that would be allowed
indicating that a property could have up to four hens. Member Brindle made a motion to grant
First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2015 -05, Amending Chapter 8 of
the Edina City Code Regarding Fowl. Member Stewart seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -06 AMENDING THE TERM OF THE ELECTRIC FRANCHISE
GRANTED TO XCEL ENERGY COMPANY — ADOPTED
Mr. Neal reported that Xcel Energy's current franchise agreement with the City to operate a State
regulated electrical utility on City -owned rights -of -way would expire on August 15, 2015. Xcel Energy
agreed to extend the expiration date to November 15, 2015, and Ordinance No. 2015 -06 would adopt the
new expiration date. Mr. Neal also presented a proposal for preparing a new franchise renewal ordinance.
Mr. Neal answered a question of the Council relating to Xcel Energy's use of alternate energy methods. •
Mayor Hovland noted that at a Mayor's Conference, he had viewed a Goals of Xcel Energy PowerPoint
presented by the Xcel Energy CEO and requested that staff look into presenting that PowerPoint to the
Council.
Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting
Ordinance No. 2015 -06, Amending the Term of the Electric Franchise Granted to Northern
States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, D /B /A Xcel Energy. Member Staunton
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.E. PROJECT UPDATE —PROMENADE PHASE 4 CONTRACT— APPROVED
Engineer Millner reported that the Council awarded the Promenade Phase 4 Project to Meisinger
Construction in the amount of $1,268,550.00 on February 17, 2015. Meisinger Construction notified the
City on February 24, 2015, that it had made a significant mathematical error in the bid. Representatives
from the City, contractor, and design team met on March 2, 2015, with legal counsel and the parties were
unable to develop a plan where Meisinger Construction would complete the project. Mr. Millner
presented three options for the Council to consider including: Option #1 Award to second lowest bidder;
Option #2 Rebid with same project scope and bid documents; and, Option #3 Rebid with smaller project
scope. Staff recommended Option #3 Rebid with smaller project scope to reduce impacts to limited
funding sources. Mr. Millner also explained that legal counsel for Meisinger Construction had stated that •
they were willing to litigate if the City tried to pull the bid bond, but verbally committed to a $10,000 cash
settlement to cover a portion of the re -work.
Page 4
Minutes /Edina City Council /March 17, 2015
The Council asked questions relating to the project timeline, Peterson Companies' reputation and quality
• of work, and funding sources. Mr. Neal noted the possibility of a Housing and Redevelopment Authority
tax levy as a funding source. The Council discussed the three options and acknowledged the importance
of keeping the project the same as the original design. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded
by Member Stewart, approving Option #1 Award to Second Lowest Bidder, Peterson
Companies at $1,443,339.23.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.F. BIDS FOR STAIR ELEVATOR TOWER AT SOTH FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT— REJECTED
Public Works Director Olson shared that the Council approved a feasibility study for the 50th and France
Parking and Way Finding Improvement Project on January 21, 2014, that included $850,000.00 in
construction cost for a stair elevator tower at the northeast corner of the south ramp. To date, the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority had spent just over $1,550,000.00 on the first phases of the
project. Bids were opened on February 10, 2015, and came in 168% higher than the feasibility study costs.
Economic Development Manager Neuendorf reported where the stair elevator tower would be located
and presented a sketch of the design. Mr. Neuendorf explained the challenges of both alternative sites for
the tower and other design options. Staff recommended rejecting all of the bids and waiting for the "right
time" to consider this project again.
The Council asked questions relating to cost and other possible locations. Mr. Olson updated the Council
on the five projects that had been completed last summer. Member Brindle made a motion,
seconded by Member Swenson, rejecting all bids for the Stair Elevator Tower Project at the
south ramp of 50th and France Avenue.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.G. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE — 2015 QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY— APPROVED
Communications and Technology Services Director Bennerotte presented the Request for Purchase for
the 2015 Quality of Life Survey. The City was scheduled to complete its every other year survey this year.
Staff secured proposals from Morris - Leatherman and the National Research Center for administering the
survey, resulting in three alternatives. Ms. Bennerotte explained the three alternatives and shared the
staffs recommendation to work with the National Research Center to complete a custom survey in 2015.
Ms. Bennerotte addressed questions of the Council relating to the budget for the survey and concerns
with being able to compare results to previous surveys. Member Staunton made a motion,
seconded by Member Stewart, approving the Request for Purchase, 2015 Quality of Life
Survey (custom survey), awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, National Research
Center at $27,250.00.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.H. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -13 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND
DONATIONS
Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be
adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -13 accepting
various grants and donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
• Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.1. COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS TO THE SOUTHDALE FRANCE AVENUE WORK GROUP
FOR THE INITIAL PHASE AND WORK SCHEDULE — APPROVED
Page 5
Minutes /Edina City Council /March 17, 2015
Mr. Teague shared that, as recommended by the Planning Commission at the City Council's March 3,
2015, meeting, the Council was asked to approve the work schedule and appoint four individuals to the .
Southdale France Avenue Area Planning Work Group.
Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, appointing Michael
Schroeder, community -at -large member and convener of first meeting; Steve Brown,
neighborhood representative member; Peter Fitzgerald, commercial property owner; and,
Lori Syverson, community organization member, to the Southdale France Avenue Area
Planning Work Group.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence.
IX.B. MINUTES:
1. ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION, DECEMBER 28, 2014 AND JANUARY 22,
2015
2. PARK BOARD, FEBRUARY 10, 2015
3. VETERAN'S MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, JANUARY 30, 2015
4. CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES, JULY 23, 2012 AND DRAFT
MINUTES, MARCH 6, 2015
5. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, FEBRUARY 10, 2015
6. PLANNING COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 25, 2015
7. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, JANUARY 15, 2015
IXC. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION FROM THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT
COMMISSION, ADDING AN ENVIRONMENT PRINCIPLE TO THE GRANDVIEW PLAN
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Informational; no action required.
X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received
X►. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received
X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received
XII.A. COUNCIL CORRESPONDENCE
X111. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned
at 10:06 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 7, 2015.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the March 17, 2015, meeting available. •
Page 6
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 17, 2015
5:01 P.M.
ROLLCALL
Mayor Pro Tern Ann Swenson called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. in the Community Room of City
Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Mary Brindle, Kevin Staunton and Bob Stewart and Mayor Pro Tern
Swenson. Mayor Jim Hovland arrived at 5:04 p.m.
Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director;
Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director; Ann Kattreh,
Parks & Recreation Director; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Chad Millner, Scott Neal, City Manager;
Engineering Director; and Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager.
Mayor Pro Tern said the meeting would focus on two topics. The first part of the meeting would be spent
hearing from Superintendent Ric Dressen on the Next Generation of Edina Public Schools and the
upcoming bond referendum. The latter part of the meeting would be spent getting an update on the park,
recreation and trails strategic planning process.
JOINT MEETING WITH ISD 273 (Edina) PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Members of the Edina Board of Education present for the meeting were Cathy Cella, David Goldstein,
Randy Meyer, Regina Neville, Lisa O'Brien, Sarah Patzloff and Leny Wallen- Friedman. School district staff
present were Margo Bauck, Susan Brott, Valerie Burke and Dressen.
Dressen provided an overview of the school district's strategic plan, "Next Generation of Edina Public
Schools," and bond referendum. The mission of the Edina Public Schools, working in partnership with the
family and the community, is to educate all individuals to be responsible, lifelong learners who possess the
skills, knowledge, creativity, self - worth, and ethical values necessary to thrive in a rapidly changing, culturally
diverse, global society. Dressen said that the mission statement can be boiled down to "all for all."
The strategic plan caused the school district to think differently about how to provide a 21St century
learning experience in 20th century facilities. After much study, a Next Generation Facilities Advisory Task
Force recommended a May 2015 bond referendum to provide capital to make changes throughout the
district. On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, residents of Edina Public Schools will have the opportunity to vote on a
one - question bond referendum of $124.9 million in bond funding, payable over 21 years, for the purposes
of updating learning spaces and enhancing building security at the district's 10 schools, while also improving
district infrastructure.
Dressen explained that school district staff have been making similar presentations throughout the
community and said that most -asked questions about the bond referendum are "What's my school going to
look like ?" "Why are ninth graders moving to Edina High School ?" and "What are the tax impacts of the
bond referendum ?"
Council members asked a few questions about Next Generation and the bond referendum. School district
staff and School Board Members were encouraged to ask questions of the City. Meyer cautioned the City
against establishing tax - increment financing districts that negatively impact the school district.
PARK STRATEGIC PLAN
At approximately 6 p.m., Mayor Hovland explained that the Council needed to move on to its second
order of business: park, recreation and trails strategic plan. Consultants Terry Minarik of Confluence, Jeff
Bransford of Pros Consulting and Mark Wentzell of 292 Design Group gave a presentation covering
progress to date, trends, goals, strategies and draft mission statements of the project.
Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /March 17, 2015
The five key areas of development identified by the consulting team are natural resources; parks, open
spaces and trails; recreation facilities; recreation programs; and finance and management. The team then
showed the Council draft vision statements for each of the areas.
The consultants explained that the next steps in the process include a March 27, 2015 Strategic Planning
Committee meeting; April 14, 2015 Park Board meeting; May 5, 2015 City Council work session, when a
draft strategic plan will be presented; May 12, 2015 Park Board meeting; and June 16, 2015 City Council
presentation, when the plan is expected to be presented for adoption.
There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 7, 2015
James B. Hovland, Mayor
•
0
0
•
0
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 1
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1074
3119/2015
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
54.40
366988
1872335
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
116.80
366989
1872338
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
164.00
366987
1872339
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
335.20
1075
3/19/2015
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
367.07
COFFEE
366536
1166223
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
64.60
COFFEE
366882
9597669
7411.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
123.34
COFFEE FILTER REPLACEMENT
366883
9598566
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
555.01
1076
3/19/2015
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
219.10
366662
47272200
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
190.00
366993
47289400
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
106.50
366994
47373900
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
306.65
366748
47374000
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,194.80
366747
47374300
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
130.63
366664
6525300
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
130.63
366996
6526600
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
119.69
366663
91668000
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
157.57
366995
91699300
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,557.77
1077
3/1912015
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
87.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES
366710
WO- 101980 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
23.28
OFFICE SUPPLIES
366711
WO- 101987 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
116.34
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003140
366923
WO- 102575 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
227.05
1078
3119/2015
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
629.95
STEPASSEMBLIES
00005081
366575
932838X1
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
283.83
WELDMENTS, CLAMPS
00005067
366576
936983X1
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
102.74
STEP
00005067
366577
936983X2
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
65.90
COOLANT
00005166
366578
939373
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
167.42
FILTERS, ELEMENT
00005100
366712
940450
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,249.84
1079
3/19/2015
100677 CARGILL INC.
5,319.16
ROAD SALT
00005070
367035
2902165801
1316.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
5,539.50
ROAD SALT
00005070
367036
2902168032
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 2
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 -
3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1079
3/19/2016
100677 CARGILL INC.
Continued...
1,801.64
ROAD SALT 00005070
367037
2902174888
1316.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
5,567.88
ROAD SALT 00005070
367038
2902187994
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
1,528.52
ROAD SALT 00005070
367039
2902191962
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
19,756.70
1080
3/19/2015
100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
122.61
XCEL ENERGY FOR ADAMS PK LS
366580
6144
5934.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
122.61
1081
3/19/2016
130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
237.80
366750
161571
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
237.80
1082
3/19/2016
104020 DALCO
593.80
TOWELS, TISSUE 00001585
366581
2858511
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
650.80
CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001593
366827
2859172
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,244.60
1083
3/1912015
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
447.50
366753
793658
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,093.00
366669
793659
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
24.60
366670
793660
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,015.40
366751
793661
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
60.00
366752
793662
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
4,640.50
1084
3119/2016
116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE
305.46
AD FOR BID
366833
742054259
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
255.21
AD FOR BID
366834
742054264
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
560.67
1086
3/19/2016
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
126.01
THERMAL ROLLS
366718
132395
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
189.01
THERMAL ROLLS
366717
132435
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
315.02
1086
3/19/2016
129608 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS
3,604.02
MAIL MAR 2015 BILLS
367040
100371
5902.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
3,604.02
0
9
0
CITY OF OA INA
3/17/2013 13:48:23
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 3
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1087 3/19/2015
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
Continued...
106.95
FITTINGS
00001587
366589
903299
5913.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
176.23
PIPE FITTINGS
00001568
366590
903333
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
283.18
1088 3/19/2015
129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC.
250.00
REVISED MAINTENANCE INVOICE
366649
JJ5536BAL
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
500.00
EDINET MAINTENANCE
366719
JJ5610
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
1,200.00
EDINA MICROSITE NAVIGATION
366898
JJ5624
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
1,950.00
1089 3119/2016
102146 JESSEN PRESS
80.00
LETTERHEAD
366839
667980
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
80.00
1090 3119/2015
100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER
450.00
PUBLIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT
366947
9631
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
450.00
1091 3/19/2015
102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC.
4,895.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
1600.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PARKADMIN. GENERAL
4,775.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5110.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
5,375.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5310.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
5,040.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
4,835.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS
5,735.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5710.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
4,035.00
MAXGALAXY SYSTEM
366840
16726
5760.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
34,690.00
1092 3/19/2015
101483 MENARDS
31.15
BIRCH PANEL, SCREWS
00001485
366723
78169
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
234.91
METAL STUDS, PLYWOOD
00001487
366724
78173
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
128.80
LUMBER, PVC CONDUIT
00001492
366725
78266
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
162.97
COMPACT REFRIGERATOR
00001490
366726
78354
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
41.77
SANDING BLOCKS, DRILL BITS
00001510
366841
78855
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
28.54
DRILL BIT SET, PVC CAPS
00001513
366842
78919
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
167.76
MOULDING, CAUKING
00001524
366845
79238
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
38.36
DRYWALL MUD, SANDING SPONGES0001517
366844
79247
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
89.91-
RETURN
366846
79266
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
133.79
EXTENSION JAMBS
00001524
366843
79271
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
65.46
25' TAPE, WASHERS
00001529
366847
79356
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL Page - 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date Amount
1092 3119/2015
3.49
18.94
105.97
108.71
59.51
10.39
55.20
34.17
260.00
61.25
37.88
16.11
156.24
454.98
27.57
5.53
6.62
289.51
24.97
61.48
159.98
148.99-
2,753.11
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
101483 MENARDS
SOS PADS 00001530 366848 79412
SPRAYADHESIVE 00001535 366849 79689
LUMBER, SCREWS, PLYWOOD 00001536 366850 79699
PLYWOOD, WASHERS 00001540 366851 79769
UTILITY HOOKS, SHELF BRACKETS 00001544 366852 79802
CEDAR 00001549 366853 79851
PAINT 00001546 366854 79855
PAINT 00005455 366596 79916
MAILBOX MATERIALS 00001556 366856 79969
TAPE, TRAY LINERS, ROLLERS 00001562 366855 79977
HEATERS 00001566 366546 80166
LADDER CHAIN 00001574 366547 80318
CEDAR POSTS, COIL, BOLTS 00001580 366857 80372
WATER HEATER 00001581 366728 80378
LIGHT BULBS, DOLLY TIRE 00001586 366859 80392
LAP LINK CHAIN 00001589 366858 80394
FURNACE PIPE, TEFLON PASTE 00001590 366727 80429
2'X4' STUDS, PLYWOOD 00001595 366860 80439
TRIGGER TORCH KIT 00001596 366597 80457
LUMBER, FOAM TRIMMER, BOLTS 00001601 366949 80723
PSI CAMPBELL HAUS PW, PENLIGHZ0001626 366950 80886
RETURN 366951 80898
1093 3119/2016 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
192.00 CUTLERY 366730 36211
192.00
1094 3/19/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
300.29 FUEL STOP 00006302 366599 998747 -00
300.29
1095 3/1912015 129485 PAPCO INC.
60.12 TOWELS 366902 91216 -1
55.78 BAGS 366903 91289
115.90
1096 3/19/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
919.26 TIRES 00005966 366600 210162579
302.50 OFF ROAD SERVICE, FLAT REPAIR 00005132 366611 210163517
Account No
1301.6556
1552.6406
1325.6406
1552.6406
1325.6406
1318.6406
1325.6406
5422.6406
1318.6406
1325.6406
47083.6710
1552.6406
1301.6406
1646.6530
1551.6406
1301.6406
1646.6530
1552.6406
1301.6556
1301.6406
5921.6406
5921.6406
1551.6406
5422.6530
7411.6511
7411.6406
1553.6583
91"5 3.6180
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TOOLS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TIRES & TUBES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET NAME SIGNS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET NAME SIGNS
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
STREET NAME SIGNS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
STREET NAME SIGNS
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
CITY HALL GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PSTF OCCUPANCY
PSTF OCCUPANCY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPWN GEN
R55CKR2
Lo 01
CITY OF E•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 5
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1096
3/1912015
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE
INC.
Continued...
719.00
TIRES
00005132
366735
210163812
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,940.76
1097
3/1912015
127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC.
3,620.00
POWER LOAD INSTALLS
366959
1156
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
3,620.00
1098
3/1912015
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
1,450.16
CUTLERY SETS, CUPS, PLATES
366963
7639
5720.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
572.38
TOWELS, TISSUE, LINERS
00002174
366962
7640
5720.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
128.56
HOT CUPS
366961
7644
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
2,151.10
1099
3/1912015
122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING
900.00
SCADA PROGRAMMING
00001642
366737
1485
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
900.00
1100
3119/2015
101004 SPS COMPANIES
141.68
HVAC PARTS
00001527
366656
S3048702.001
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
141.68
1101
3119/2015
103277 TITAN MACHINERY
326.50
W/C KIT, KEYS
00005168
366739
1718751
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
326.50
1102
3/1912015
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
180.22
GUARD, RIM ASSEMBLY
00006303
366613
E186631
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
180.22
1103
3/1912015
119454 VINOCOPIA
114.50
366689
0119402 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
257.88
366799
0119403 -IN
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
323.38
366690
0119404 -IN
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
165.00
366800
0119884 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
860.76
1104
3119/2015
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
970.85
366691
386661 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
517.90
366804
387157 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
509.90
366802
387159 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1104
3/19/2015
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
Continued...
1,846.40
366803
387294 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
3,845.05
391894
3119/2015
105696 3CMA
390.00-
MEMBERSHIP DUES
366705
2015
1130.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
390.00
391895
3119/2015
133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM
170.00
DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS
366569
030915
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
170.00
391896
3119/2015
124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES -MIDWEST
601.12
JANITORIAL SERVICES
366813
7776366
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,575.00
JANITORIAL SERVICES
366814
7780098
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5,176.12
391898
3/1912015
135984 ACME TOOLS
310.00
GREASE GUN 00005199
366644
3241599
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
310.00
391899
3/19/2015
105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER
170.66
FOAM CUPS
366570
445982
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
170.66
391900
3119/2015
102715 ALLEGRA
165.52
GIFT CERTIFICATES 00002176
366916
111059
5710.6575
PRINTING
165.52
391901
3/19/2015
135195 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP
170.00
FEB 2015 COBRA FEES
366881
26224
1556.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
170.00
391902
3119/2015
103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC.
90.00-
366815
15877DB REVISED
421130.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
12,400.00
CONFERENCE RM AV UPGRADES
366707
SYSINV15876DB
421130.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
12, 310.00
391903
3/1912015
105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
149.80
COFFEE
366571
155638
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
149.80
•
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page- 6
Business Unit
VERNON SELLING
COMMUNICATIONS
SENIOR CITIZENS
CITY HALL GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
SENIOR CITIZENS
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
SENIOR CITIZENS
•
391906 3/19/2015
•
101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
IAFCI 2015 DUES
366917
031315
CITY OFA
80.00
Council Check Register by GL
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
CONCESSION PRODUCT
366919
503100141
5730.5510
462.63
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
366918
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
391903
3119/2015
106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
Continued...
391904
3/19/2015
MAR 2015ADMINFEE
101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES
10627
1556.6103
628.50
226.88
366566
022815 1470.6201
LAUNDRY
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
316.42
366566
022815 1551.6201
LAUNDRY
366661
3020452
512.88
366566
022815 1470.6201
LAUNDRY
3021547
5862.5514
97.67
170.00
366566
022815 5821.6201
LAUNDRY
5842.5514
141.21
366566
022815 5841.6201
LAUNDRY
885.00
207.91
366745
366566
022815 5861.6201
LAUNDRY
391906 3/19/2015
101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK
80.00
IAFCI 2015 DUES
366917
031315
1400.6105
80.00
391906 3119/2015
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
378.57
CONCESSION PRODUCT
366919
503100141
5730.5510
462.63
CONCESSION PRODUCT
366918
503130613
5730.5510
841.20
391907 3/19/2015
135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS
628.50
MAR 2015ADMINFEE
366920
10627
1556.6103
628.50
391908 3119/2016
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
542.00
366661
3020452
5822.5514
160.00
366991
3021547
5862.5514
170.00
366746
3021548
5842.5514
852.00
366992
3021549
5822.5514
885.00
366745
3021550
5842.5514
1,025.00
366990
3021551
5862.5514
3,634.00
391909 3/19/2015
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
268.75
WASTE REMOVAL
366884
030115
7411.6182
268.75
391910 3/19/2016
102196 BATTERIES PLUS
130.00
DRILL BATTERIES 00001592
366708
018- 102387 -01
1646.6556
39.98
UPS BATTERIES 00004316
366709
018 - 365815
1554.6710
60.54
BATTERIES
366921
018 - 366481
1400.6406
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RUBBISH REMOVAL
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/17/2003:48:23
Page - 7
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
PSTF OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
391910
3/1912015
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
Continued...
230.52
391911
3/1912015
135987 BAUCH, WALTER
89.00
REGISTRATION REFUND
366885
HANDGUN CLASS
7414.4390
REGISTRATION FEES
PUBLIC PROGRAMS
89.00
391912
311912015
118955 BCBS OF MN
88.16
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366976
SIDNEY GREEN
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
88.16
391913
3/19/2016
100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC.
2,667.25
HOCKEY GOAL MATERIALS 00001575
366816
00102260
1648.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
2,667.25
391914
3/1912015
131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
216.00
PIZZA
366922
D281N3231
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
216.00
391915
311912015
125139 BERNICK'S
585.15
366665
200622
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
584.60
366997
203721
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,169.75
391916
3/19/2016
136993 BERUBE, SHEILA
99.40
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366977
031115
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
99.40
391917
3/1912015
135980 BEST TRUCKING
100.00
HAUL ITEMS TO AUCTION
366572
899261
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
100.00
391918
3/1912015
125209 BISEK, KATIE
138.58
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367047
031315
1554.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
138.58
391919
3/1912015
102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN
7,894.34
MAR 2015 PREMIUMS
366924
030115
1556.6043
COBRA INSURANCE
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
204,582.44
MAR 2015 PREMIUMS
366924
030115
1556.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
212,476.78
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
•
1,141.50
366666
125205
5822.5513
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
391924
3/17/20'113:48:23
135981 BOWLES, WILLIAM
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 9
AMUBLANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366574
031015
1470.4329
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
1,665.50
391925
3/19/2015
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC.
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
391920
311912016
136986 BLUM, MISSY
GOLF BALLS
366818
Continued...
5440.5511
5.00
OVERPAID FOR DOG PARK PERMIT
366817
REFUND 1400.4121
OFF -LEASH DOG PARK PERMIT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,186.11
5.00
391926
3/19/2016
391921
3/1912016
135992 BORDEN, JONATHAN
388.05
GENERATOR BRACKET 00005068
366645
272.54
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366978
6216 HANSEN RD 5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
272.54
391927
3119/2015
102911 BROOKS, JOHN
391922
3/19/2015
135763 BOSLEY, JAKE
260.00
CONFERENCE FEE
366925
031315
1470.6104
210.00
GFOA MEMBERSHIP
366573
031015 1160.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FINANCE
391928
3119/2016
210.00
103244 BURTIS, ROBERT
391923
3119/2016
EP PERFORMANCE 3/26/15
119361 BOURGET IMPORTS
030115
5710.6136
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
1,141.50
366666
125205
5822.5513
1,141.50
391924
3/1912015
135981 BOWLES, WILLIAM
1,665.50
AMUBLANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366574
031015
1470.4329
1,665.50
391925
3/19/2015
104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC.
1,426.89
GOLF BALLS
366979
1002334907
5440.5511
579.60
GOLF BALLS
366818
1002335438
5440.5511
179.62
GOLF BALLS
366819
1002335944
5440.5511
2,186.11
391926
3/19/2016
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
388.05
GENERATOR BRACKET 00005068
366645
12515778 -00
1553.6530
388.05
391927
3119/2015
102911 BROOKS, JOHN
260.00
CONFERENCE FEE
366925
031315
1470.6104
260.00
391928
3119/2016
103244 BURTIS, ROBERT
200.00
EP PERFORMANCE 3/26/15
366713
030115
5710.6136
200.00
391929
3119/2016
102929 CABINET CONCEPTS
1,387.00
STORAGE CABINET
367044
11141
5821.6406
1,387.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
3119/2015
2310.6406
129923 CAWLEY
CITY OF EDINA
E911
41.94
NAME BADGES
1628.6188
Council Check Register by GL
SENIOR CITIZENS
391932
3/19/2015
1622.6188
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
SKATING & HOCKEY
98.91
612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911
1646.6188
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
391929 3/1912015
0146 -2/15
102929 CABINET CONCEPTS
312.97
Continued...
391930 3119/2015
0146 -2/15
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
TELEPHONE
WELL PUMPS
57.52
104.30
5932.6188
366668
00010896 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
366646
3,878.32
590.03
366667
530133 5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
104.90
645.10
2310.6406
366749
534011 5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
391931
3119/2015
2310.6406
129923 CAWLEY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E911
41.94
NAME BADGES
1628.6188
41.94
SENIOR CITIZENS
391932
3/19/2015
1622.6188
123898 CENTURYLINK
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
98.91
612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911
1646.6188
60.15
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
366822
0146 -2/15
169.62
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
171.18
0146 -2/15
5511.6188
312.97
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
366822
0146 -2/15
296.30
TELEPHONE
WELL PUMPS
57.52
0146 -2/15
5932.6188
40.86
GENERAL STORM SEWER
366646
0426 -3/15
590.03
612 E01 -0426
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
104.90
612 E23 -0652
2310.6406
87.37
952 941 -1019
366538
1019 -2/15
59.34
952 835 -1161
TELEPHONE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
59.10
952 941 -1410
5720.6188
207.51
952 835 -6661
366539
1410 -2/15
590.03
612 E12 -6797
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
110.59
952 826 -7398
1552.6188
3,016.38
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
391933
3/19/2015
1554.6188
135835 CENTURYLINK
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,335.45
612 -D08- 2053 -053
7410.6103
1,335.45
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
391934
311912015
100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
1,590.00
2ND HALF ACCREDITATION FEE
1,590.00
391935
3/19/2015
118580 CITY OF EDINA
40.00
AWARDS RECEPTION
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 10
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
366537 V277047 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES
366821
0056 -3/15
2310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E911
366822
0146 -2/15
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
366822
0146 -2/15
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
366822
0146 -2/15
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
366822
0146 -2/15
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
366822
0146 -2/15
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
366822
0146 -2/15
5911.6188
TELEPHONE
WELL PUMPS
366822
0146 -2/15
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
366646
0426 -3/15
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
366820
0652 -3/15
2310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
E911
366538
1019 -2/15
7411.6188
TELEPHONE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
366887
1161 -3/15
5720.6188
TELEPHONE
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
366539
1410 -2/15
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
366886
6661 -3/15
1552.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
366647
6797 -3/15
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
366540
7398 -2/15
7410.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
366714 2053 -3/15 2310.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES E911
366926 PH1226 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH
366541 VOLUNTEER • 1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
HUMAN RELATIOOMMISSION
•
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY 04
3/17/201013:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 11
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
391935
3/19/2015
118580 CITY OF EDINA
Continued...
40.00
391936
3/19/2015
122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS
100.00
SERVICE /MAINTENANCE
366890
COM -0523
7411.6188
TELEPHONE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
100.00
391937
3/1912016
122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES
91.89
00102561- 0112920000
366823
112920000 -3/15
5841.6189
SEWER & WATER
YORK OCCUPANCY
1,577.89
00077479- 0113317143
366927
113317143 -3/15
5720.6189
SEWER & WATER
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
33.08
00103650- 0155251008
366889
155251008 -3/15
7411.6189
SEWER & WATER
PSTF OCCUPANCY
125.73
00103650- 0155252016
366888
155252016 -3/15
7411.6189
SEWER & WATER
PSTF OCCUPANCY
241.34
00113607 - 0170005201
366928
170005201 -3/15
1470.6189
SEWER & WATER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,139.91
00103426- 0345052006
366579
345052006 -2/15
1552.6189
SEWER & WATER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
7,209.84
391938
3119/2015
102166 CLEVELAND GOLF
404.40
GOLF BALLS
366824
4433468
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
404.40
391939
3/19/2015
120433 COMCAST
28.94
8772 10 614 0220686
366929
220686 -3/15
5710.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
24.78
8772 10 614 0023973
366825
23973 -3/15
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL GENERAL
53.72
391940
3/1912015
120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT
1,057.06
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
366542
631601/02
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,057.07
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
366542
631601/02
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
1,057.07
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
366542
631601/02
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
900.00
GOLF DOME ADVERTISING
366826
NW630750
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
4,071.20
391941
3/19/2015
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
216.30
114- 10014090 -3
366715
022815
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
20.48
114 - 09855685 -4
366891
2/28/15
7411.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
236.78
391942
3/1912016
121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP
613.50
REPAIR BANDS 00001467
366930
8172145
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
613.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
17,241.50 HOCKEY %
366931 BOYS 5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CITY OF EDINA
6,654.00 HOCKEY %
391948 311912016
132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
23,895.50
Council Check Register by GL
760.00
BRAEMAR - WEDDING SECTION AD
366832
194229
5440.6122
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
PUBLISH NOTICE
366830
194717
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
921.80
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
366716
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
391943
3/19/2015
921.81
112319 DARG BOLGREAN MENK INC.
366716
195770
Continued...
ADVERTISING OTHER
417.00
770.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
366828
18826 1552.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,987.10
770.00
391949 3119/2015
391944
311912015
129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
1,000.00
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT
366982
2,555.70
APR 2015 PREMIUMS
366892
F018342 -4/15 9900.2033.16
LTD - 99
2,555.70
391950 3/1912016
129604 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
391945
3/1912015
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
36.78
ALLIGATOR CLIPS 00005032
366582
978657 1553.6556
TOOLS
26.40
DRIVER 00005070
366583
982179 1553.6556
TOOLS
63.18
391946
3/19/2016
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC.
201.58
110311893
366829
110311893 -2/15 5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
92.93
651972955
366893
651972955 -2/15 5760.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
294.51
391947
3/1912015
119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC.
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 12
Business Unit
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PAYROLL CLEARING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
1,373.54 APPAREL 366980 533533 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
132.00 APPAREL 366981 533670 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,505.54
17,241.50 HOCKEY %
366931 BOYS 5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
6,654.00 HOCKEY %
391948 311912016
132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
23,895.50
760.00
BRAEMAR - WEDDING SECTION AD
366832
194229
5440.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
44.68
PUBLISH NOTICE
366830
194717
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
921.80
EDINA LIQUOR ADS
366716
195770
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
921.81
EDINA LIQUOR ADS
366716
195770
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
921.81
EDINA LIQUOR ADS
366716
195770
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
417.00
JOB ADVERTISING
366831
195778
1556.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
3,987.10
391949 3119/2015
101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF
ASSOCIATION
1,000.00
SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFIT
366982
031615
1470.4218
POLICE AID 1%
1,000.00
391950 3/1912016
129604 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17,241.50 HOCKEY %
366931 BOYS 5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
6,654.00 HOCKEY %
366932 GIRLS 5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
23,895.50
0
•
0
391957 3/1912015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
780.00 MERCHANDISE 366835 40937070 5440.5511
38.00- CREDIT 366836 80122369 5440.5511
742.00
391958 3/1912016 130062 GLOWSHOT TARGETS LLC
321.83 TARGETS FOR SALE 366896 353 7410.5510
321.83
391959 3/19/2016 101103 GRAINGER
0
3/17/201 :48:23
Page- 13
Business Unit
ICE ARENA REVENUES
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
FINANCE
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
ICE ARENA REVENUES
PARKING RAMP
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
DISTRIBUTION
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD PSTF ADMINISTRATION
0
11
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3119/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
391951
3/1912015
135991 EDINA PEEWEE Bi
Continued...
210.00
ICE REFUND
366933
ARENA
5501.4556
ICE RENTAL
210.00
391952
3/19/2015
100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC.
1,487.50
UTILITY RATE ANALYSIS
366894
66974
5902.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,255.00
BRAEMAR GOLF STUDY
366895
66977
1160.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,742.50
391953
3/1912015
126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
269.19
REPAIR CLAMPS 00001479
366584
0127019
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,026.07
REPAIR CLAMPS, FITTINGS 00001578
366934
0127298
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,295.26
391954
3119/2015
135990 FINNOFF, LESLIE
135.00
CLASSES REFUND
366935
031115
5501.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
135.00
391965
3/19/2015
126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING
1,250.00
CLEAN PARKING RAMP GLASS
366585
2315 -9248
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,250.00
391956
3119/2015
100764 G & K SERVICES
65.88
366567
022815
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
123.42
366567
022815
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
196.90
366567
022815
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
529.50
366567
022815
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
50.72
366567
022815
5511.6201
LAUNDRY
248.60
366567
022815
5913.6201
LAUNDRY
391957 3/1912015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
780.00 MERCHANDISE 366835 40937070 5440.5511
38.00- CREDIT 366836 80122369 5440.5511
742.00
391958 3/1912016 130062 GLOWSHOT TARGETS LLC
321.83 TARGETS FOR SALE 366896 353 7410.5510
321.83
391959 3/19/2016 101103 GRAINGER
0
3/17/201 :48:23
Page- 13
Business Unit
ICE ARENA REVENUES
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
FINANCE
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
ICE ARENA REVENUES
PARKING RAMP
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
DISTRIBUTION
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
COST OF GOODS SOLD PSTF ADMINISTRATION
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
391959 3/19/2015
101103 GRAINGER
Continued...
133.68
RECYCLING CONTAINERS 00006364
366586
9666492781 5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
277.74
CEILING FAN
366648
9671226182 1470.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
213.89
BATTERY CHARGER, CABLE 00002175
366936
9679671397 5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
625.31
391960 3/1912015
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
366755 178787 5822.5513
366754 178788 5862.5513
391961 3/1912016 102126 GREG LESSMAN SALES
118.00 GOLF BAG 366837 53719 5440.5511
118.00
391962 3119/2016 100790 HACH COMPANY
200.94 REAGENT 00001554 366587 9263537 5915.6406
68.94 REAGENT 00001644 366937 9272172 5915.6406
269.88
391963 3119/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC
234.92 LABEL MAKER 00001560 366543 138954 -1 5913.6406
234.92
391964 311912016 136989 HARDACKER, JOHN
11.00 CLASS B LICENSE 366938 REIMBURSE 1470.6260
325.00 EMT REFRESHER 366938 REIMBURSE 1470.6104
336.00
391966 3119/2016 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
12,502.81 APR 2015 PREMIUM 366897 56996193 1556.6040
12,502.81
391966 3/19/2015 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
347.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 366588 1000056144 5422.6182
347.00
391967 3/19/2016 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,336.44 RADIO FLEET FEES 366939 1000058092 1470.6151
1,336.44
0 0
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 14
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
HOSPITALIZATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
•
391976 3/19/2015 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
R55CKR2 LO0 01
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/203:48:23
Council Check Register by
GL
Page- 15
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
391968
3119/2016
103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS
Continued...
232.50
SCRUBBER TUNE UP
366940
700174071
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
232.50
391969
3/19/2015
104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
1,381.50
366757
751191
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
759.00
366758
751203
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,149.16
366756
751445
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
4,289.66
391970
3/19/2016
133661 HOWARD, JOHN
209.95
TROUBLED WATERS
366544
1122.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM
349.00
MORE THAN HONEY
366544
1122.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM
558.95
391971
3/1912015
101468 IIMC
120.00
DUES - JANE TIMM
366838
20252 -2015
1180.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ELECTION
120.00
391972
3/19/2015
131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
350.00
366998
27128
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
350.00
391973
3/19/2015
130866 INFORMATION POLICY ANALYSIS
225.00
DATA PRACTICE TRAINING
366941
264906
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
225.00
391974
3/19/2015
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
85.00
REGISTRATION FORMS
366545
67604
1600.6575
PRINTING
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
85.00
391975
3/19/2015
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
582.40-
366763
2315502
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
249.60-
366764
2315504
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,392.79
366759
2334853
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,476.00
366762
2334855
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
9,286.80
366761
2334863
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
38.80
366760
2334864
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
14,362.39
391976 3/19/2015 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL Page- 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
391976 3119/2015
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
Continued...
58.28
366765
5102877
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,756.39
366673
5107727
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
317.27
366672
5107731
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
907.09
366671
5107735
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,130.09
366999
5112744
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
121.47
367008
5112746
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2.32
367006
5112747
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,169.59
366777
5112748
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,772.31
366771
5112751
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,080.63
366773
5112753
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
437.38
366770
5112754
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
918.08
366772
5112755
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
183.07
366769
5112756
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,150.46
366768
5112757
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
238.32
366767
5112758
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
31.41
366766
5112759
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
3,806.06
366775
5112760
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,513.77
367004
5112762
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
90.97
366776
5112763
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,928.94
367005
5112764
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
121.47
367007
5112765
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,395.77
367003
5112766
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
208.87
366774
5112767
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
135.25
367001
5113167
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
450.00
367000
5113168
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
640.00
367002
5113169
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1.00-
366674
516254
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
.70-
366675
516335
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
25,563.56
391977 3/19/2015
102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
135.97
HVAC PARTS 00001408
366650
092621
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
35.77
FAN SWITCH 00001552
366591
097330
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
171.74
391978 3/1912015
111018 KEEPRS INC.
200.00
UNIFORMS 00003880
366651
261114 -80
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
621.94
UNIFORMS 00003556
366944
268435 -02
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
109.99
UNIFORMS 00003556
366942
268647 -02
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
621.94
UNIFORMS 00003556
366945
268647 -03
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GEN($
•
1,697.14
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
PRINTING
CITY OF EDINA
PRINTING
105887 KOESSLER, JOE
Council Check Register by GL
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
FEB /MAR SERVICES
366592
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
391978 3/1912016
111018 KEEPRS INC.
Continued...
143.27
UNIFORMS
00003509 366943 269207 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS
1628.6103
5912.6406
1553.6530
1600.6575
5110.6575
5310.6575
5410.6575
5510.6575
5710.6575
5760.6575
1553.6530
1553.6530
1553.6530
1160.6130
2310.6104
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 17
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
WELL HOUSES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PRINTING
1,697.14
PRINTING
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
391979 3/19/2015
PRINTING
105887 KOESSLER, JOE
PRINTING
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
313.20
FEB /MAR SERVICES
366592
030115
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
313.20
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
391980 3/1912016
100849 LAKELAND ENGINEERING
748.00
SOLENOID VALVES 00001515
366593
12283576 -01
748.00
391981 3119/2015
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
423.21
PLOW BOLTS, NUTS, TY -RAP 00005092
366594
9303104050
423.21
391982 3/19/2015
128234 LEFFLER PRINTING COMPANY INC.
5,712.00
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
7,828.00
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
423.00
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
1,481.00
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
634.72
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
634.71
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
211.57
PARK & REC DIRECTORY
366983
18891
16, 925.00
391983 3/19/2015
100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC.
123.65
SCRAPER MOUNTING 00005093
366595
2151688
20.48
WASHERS 00005099
366720
2151772
39.55
DOOR SEALS 00005099
366946
2151773
183.68
391984 3/19/2015
117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI
6,900.00
2014 AUDIT
367045
36992
6,900.00
391986 3/19/2016
114694 MARTIN, ANTHONY
57.25
TOLL FEES FOR RENTAL CAR
366948
TRAINING
57.25
391986 3/19/2015
122664 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC.
1628.6103
5912.6406
1553.6530
1600.6575
5110.6575
5310.6575
5410.6575
5510.6575
5710.6575
5760.6575
1553.6530
1553.6530
1553.6530
1160.6130
2310.6104
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 17
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
WELL HOUSES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PRINTING
PARKADMIN. GENERAL
PRINTING
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
PRINTING
CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PROFESSIONALSERV -AUDIT FINANCE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 18
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 —
3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
391986
3/19/2015
122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC.
Continued...
458.51
OXYGEN 00003649
366652
10921442
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
458.51
391987
3/19/2015
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
13,038.00
EQUIP MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
366721
0202932 -IN
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
9,978.00
PHONE SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
366722
0202943 -IN
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
23,016.00
391988
3/1912015
134646 MCGRATH, PATTY
83.38
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
366653
031015
5710.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
83.38
391989
3/19/2015
100885 METRO SALES INC
2,070.39
ADMIN MFP USAGE
366729
INV201155
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
2,070.39
391990
3/19/2015
102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
142.50
OFFICIATING FEES
366548
4736
1621.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
142.50
391991
3/19/2015
132441 METROPOLITAN EMERGENCY SERVICES BOARD
3,656.01
E911
366952
3052015
2310.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
E911
3,656.01
391992
311912015
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER
& WATER
2,120.00
REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001641
366598
34892
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,590.00
REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001646
366953
34897
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
3,710.00
391993
311912015
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
448.56
CO2, METHAIR
366899
183165032
7413.6545
CHEMICALS
PSTF FIRE TOWER
446.56
391994
3/1912015
127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.
21.38
WINDOW WASHING
366731
928035528
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
21.38
391995
3/1912015
101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL
AGENCY
258.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE
366862
2200100860
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
258.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE
366900
2200101220
7410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
•
•
•
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 19
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
COMMUNICATIONS
PARKING RAMP
CITY HALL GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GOLF CARS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
STREET NAME SIGNS
R55CKR2
LO0 01
CITY OF•A
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/1912015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
391995
3/19/2015
101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
Continued...
516.00
391996
311912015
100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD
1,620.00
18 OFFICER LICENSES
366954
RENEWALS
1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1,620.00
391997
3/1912015
128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
93.31
POSTERS, FLYERS
366864
17182
1122.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
263.66
EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS
366549
17206
5862.6575
PRINTING
263.67
EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS
366549
17206
5842.6575
PRINTING
263.67
EDINA LIQUOR FLYERS
366549
17206
5822.6575
PRINTING
193.83
CARDS & ENVELOPES
366863
17236
1130.6575
PRINTING
1,078.14
391998
3/1912015
102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
100.00
ELEVATOR PERMITS
366861
ALR00482051
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
100.00
ELEVATOR PERMITS
366861
ALR00482051
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
100.00
ELEVATOR LICENSE
366654
ALR00487451
1470.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
300.00
391999
3/19/2015
122793 MODERN MARKETING INC.
143.24
EVIDENCE BAGS
366732
MM107354
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
371.13
EVIDENCE BAGS
366733
MM107488
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
514.37
392000
311912015
100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS
170.48
PARTS
366568
022815
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
24.98
PARTS
366568
022815
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
79.94
PARTS
366568
022815
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
429.52
PARTS
366568
022815
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
7.27
PARTS
366568
022815
5921.6556
TOOLS
712.19
392001
3/1912016
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
275.00
366779
98304
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
219.00
366778
98305
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
494.00
392002
3/1912015
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,308.00
BLACK SIGN FILM 00001341
367041
TI- 0282530
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
•
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 19
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
COMMUNICATIONS
PARKING RAMP
CITY HALL GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GOLF CARS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
STREET NAME SIGNS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 20
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 -
3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392002
3/19/2015
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
Continued...
1,573.06
SIGN SHEETING 00001413
367042
TI- 0282747
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
1,273.50
SIGN SHEETING 00001499
367043
TI- 0282752
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
4,154.56
392003
3119/2015
104350 NIKE USA INC.
732.70
SHOES
366865
969041433
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
61.86
SHIRTS
366866
969295579
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
794.56
392004
3/1912016
101669 ORKIN
110.00
PEST CONTROL
366867
12079684 -3/15
1646.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
20.00
PEST CONTROL
366869
12557616 -3/15
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
65.00
PEST CONTROL
366870
12557623 -3/15
1552.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
20.00
PEST CONTROL
366868
12557635 -3/15
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
215.00
392005
3119/2015
104950 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC.
210.00
AIR SAMPLE TESTING
366901
1500132
7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
210.00
392006
3/1912015
121026 PALDA & SONS INC.
78,664.52
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2
366984
14 -4
03482.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
78,664.52
392007
3119/2015
100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
1,477.71
366780
8490136 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,017.33
366782
8490142 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
607.76
366676
8490144 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
69.26
366783
8490152 -IN
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
274.50
366677
8490153 -IN
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
184.50
366781
8490351 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,631.06
392008
3/19/2015
132860 PENTEON
31.25
NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS
366550
32933
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
31.25
NEIGHBORHOOD LISTS
366550
32933
1120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
221.00
CITY EXTRA USE AND HOSTING
366550
32933
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
365550
32933
01394.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
NORMANDALE
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01396.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
BRAEMAR HILLS C
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01411.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
EDINATERRACEOD RECON
•
0
0
•
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 21
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392008 311912015
132860 PENTEON
Continued...
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01418.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
2014 SLP STREET PROJECTS
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
44012.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
P23 50TH &FR PARKI NG&WAYFI N DING
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01416.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
54TH ST BRIDGE &STREET REPAIR
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01410.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01395.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
BRAEMAR HILLS B
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01409.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
WALNUT RIDGE NHOOD RECON
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01407.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
HAWKES NHOOD RECON
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01408.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
WARDEN AVE
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01404.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
FRANCEAVE PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01397.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
LAKE EDINAA
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01398.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
LAKE EDINA B
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01393.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
MENDELSSOHN A
3.68
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
01406.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
MORNINGSIDE NHOOD RECON
3.67
CONSTRUCTION LIST
366550
32933
03471.1705.24
CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT
RICHMOND HILLS PK
346.00
392009 3/19/2015
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
231.90
366956
47741120
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
231.90
392010 3/19/2015
124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC.
40.00
JV PEP BILLING
366957
12789
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
40.00
392011 3119/2015
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
57.16-
366680
208697
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,083.00
366679
2752362
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
57.16
366678
2752365
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
421.35
367014
2755806
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
421.16
366787
2755807
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
863.52
367018
2755808
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
394.79
366784
2755809
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
114.32
367017
2755810
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
74.38
367010
2755811
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
963.15
366786
2755813
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
74.38
367020
2755814
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
752.06
366789
2755815
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,702.84
366788
2755816
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,736.87
367012
2755817
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
114.32
367013
2755818
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/1712015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by
GL
Page - 22
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392011
3/19/2015
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
Continued...
222.66
367011
2755819
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
332.60
366785
2755820
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
3,201.16
367016
2755821
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,055.66
367015
2755822
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
56.00
367019
2756005
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
15, 584.22
392012
311912015
100119 PING
1,049.00
GOLF BAGS
366871
12662044
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
378.32
IRON SET
366872
12666950
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
590.84
IRONS
366873
12668403
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,018.16
392013
3/19/2015
124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
291.00
367009
23717
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
291.00
392014
311912015
100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO.
36.66
SEALS 00005098
366734
1- 261099
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
36.66
392015
3/19/2015
101138 PLEAA
85.00
COURSE FEE - JULIE NORGREN
366958
SPRING
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCE
85.00
COURSE FEE -AMY BACHLER
366958
SPRING
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCE
170.00
392016
311912015
129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC.
52.27
622833
366960
622833 -02 -15
5710.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
52.27
392017
3119/2015
102642 PRESTIGE FLAG
618.15
GOLF FLAGS 00006288
366602
393340
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
618.15
392018
3/19/2016
106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH
4,579.00
EMD COURSE
366904
110796
7410.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
274.94
INSTRUCTOR TRAVEL EXPENSE
366905
110797
7410.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
4,853.94
•
0
0
3/17/20 T5 13:48:23
Page - 23
Business Unit
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RECYCLING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CLUB HOUSE
CLUB HOUSE
CITY HALL GENERAL
•
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
F
CITY OEUINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392018
3/1912015
106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH
Continued...
392019
3/19/2015
136986 PUSH PROPERTIES LLC
408.61
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366736
6101 TRACYAVE
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
408.61
392020
3119/2015
135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT
208.23
HOSE
366603
125869
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
208.23
392021
3/19/2016
133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894
36,187.38
FEB 2015 RECYCLING
366551
3755180
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
36,187.38
392022
3119/2015
135982 RICHARDSON, CONSUELO J
87.73
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
366604
031015
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
87.73
392023
3/19/2015
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
120.88
SOFTENER SALT
00003648
366655
00312249
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120.88
392024
3/19/2015
134173 SAFE -FAST INC.
20.00
SAFETY GLASSES
00005128
366964
INV150300
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
26.33
SAFETY GLASSES
00005128
366964
INV150300
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
26.34
SAFETY GLASSES
00005128
366964
INV150300
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26.33
SAFETY GLASSES
00005128
366964
INV150300
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
99.00
392025
3/19/2015
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
117.18
RECYCLE PARTS WASHER
366605
R002155007
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
117.18
392026
3119/2016
117807 SAM'S CLUB
94.66
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
366906
030115
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
94.66
392027
3/19/2016
101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC.
763.12
FILTERS
00001425
366607
130789
5420.6530
REPAIR PARTS
296.78
FILTERS
00001422
366606
130790
5420.6530
REPAIR PARTS
3,396.72
HVAC FILTERS
00001424
366608
130866
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3/17/20 T5 13:48:23
Page - 23
Business Unit
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RECYCLING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CLUB HOUSE
CLUB HOUSE
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
100430 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
CITY OF EDINA
312.58
RATCHETS 00005073
366611
ARV/25088217
Council Check Register by GL
69.34
BUSHING DRIVERS, REPAIR KIT 00005074
366610
ARV/25092509
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
392033 3/19/2016
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392027
3/1912015
2,339.50
101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC.
366686
Continued...
5862.5513
891.25
4,456.62
366793
1262135
5822.5513
392028
3119/2015
125331 SCHELEN GRAY AUTO & ELECTRIC
1262136
5842.5513
655.75
3,912.14
REBUILT GENERATORS 00005137
366609
198960 1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
366794
3,912.14
5822.5513
785.94
392029
311912016
5822.5512
120784 SIGN PRO
366791
1262764
5842.5513
185.00
DASHERBOARD
366874
8808 5510.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5842.5512
555.10
185.00
366684
1262766
5862.5512
392030
3/19/2016
100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
1262767
5862.5513
6,736.14
52.70
FEB 2015 ACTIVITY
366965
13071049 5310.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
366797
52.70
5862.5513
363.75
392031
3/19/2015
5862.5513
132196 SMALL LOT MN
366796
366681 2018 5822.5513
392032 3/19/2015
100430 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL
312.58
RATCHETS 00005073
366611
ARV/25088217
1553.6556
69.34
BUSHING DRIVERS, REPAIR KIT 00005074
366610
ARV/25092509
1553.6556
381.92
392033 3/19/2016
127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
3,326.63
366687
1260388
5822.5513
2,339.50
366686
1261680
5862.5513
891.25
366793
1262135
5822.5513
2,353.75
366685
1262136
5842.5513
655.75
367021
1262761
5822.5513
5,260.75
366794
1262762
5822.5513
785.94
366792
1262763
5822.5512
6,059.09
366791
1262764
5842.5513
4,399.53
366790
1262765
5842.5512
555.10
366684
1262766
5862.5512
397.50
366682
1262767
5862.5513
6,736.14
366683
1262768
5862.5513
161.50
366797
1263398
5862.5513
363.75
366795
1263399
5862.5513
563.75
366796
1263400
5862.5513
290.25
367022
1264070
5842.5513
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 24
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ARENAADMINISTRATION
POOL ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
TOOLS
TOOLS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
is 0 0
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 25
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc
No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392033
3/19/2015
127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
Continued...
500.00-
367023
9052610
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
300.00-
367023
9052610
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
200.00-
367023
9052610
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
34,140.18
392034
3119/2015
110976 STAGES THEATRE CO.
150.00
PARKS & REC THEATRE CLASS
366738
062514
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
150.00
392035
3119/2015
129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS
665.92
MONITORING CHARGES
366875
12228047
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
665.92
392036
3/1912015
100495 STATE FIRE MARSHALL DIVISION
130.00
REGISTRATION - MEDZIS
366955
STATE
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCE
130.00
392037
3/1912015
133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
37.75
366798
4860
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
205.75
367025
4892
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
126.00
367024
4893
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
369.50
392038
3/1912015
124799 STERLING WELDING COMPANY INC.
225.00
THAW FROZEN SERVICE 00001645
366966
15751
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
225.00
392039
3/1912015
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
49.50
TIRE DISPOSAL
366969
10131321
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
233.98
TIRES 00005095
366968
10131335
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
302.44
TIRES 00005096
366967
10131356
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,258.20
TIRES 00005102
366970
10131419
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
'EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,844.12
392040
3/19/2015
136803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL
6,620.75
MAR 2015
366907
237716 -3/15
9900.2033.16
LTD - 99
PAYROLL CLEARING
364.30
MAR 2015 COBRA
366908
237716 -901
1556.6043
COBRA INSURANCE
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
6,985.05
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
3/19/2015
INSURANCE
120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA
CITY OF EDINA
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3/17/2015 13:48:23
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,135.87
EXPLORE EDINAADS
366612
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 26
1,135.88
EXPLORE EDINAADS
366612
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
2,271.75
392044
3/19/2015 - 3/1912015
124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392041 3/19/2015
102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST
296.52
Continued...
392045
803.95
FEB 2015 SERVICE
366552
831396589 1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
803.95
BACKGROUND CHECKS
366553
02516346
392042 3/19/2015
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
392046
3119/2015
116535 TRAVELERS
1,671.50
366688
879670 5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
366911
779.80
367026
880765 5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
392043
3/19/2015
INSURANCE
120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1,135.87
EXPLORE EDINAADS
366612
2015- 137137
1,135.88
EXPLORE EDINAADS
366612
2015 - 137137
2,271.75
392044
3/19/2015
124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES
296.52
COPIER USAGE
366909
274105279
296.52
392045
3119/2015
104064 TRANS UNION LLC
30.90
BACKGROUND CHECKS
366553
02516346
30.90
392046
3119/2015
116535 TRAVELERS
787.50
366911
478351
602.50
366912
478352
83.50
366913
478687
122.50
DEDUCTIBLE
366910
478688
1,596.00
392047
3119/2015
101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO.
230.50
DOOR CLOSERS
366876
702530
1,112.92
PARTITIONS
366877
704581
1,343.42
392048
3/19/2015
103048 U.S. BANK
450.00
2007A PAYING AGENT
367046
3909633
450.00
392049
3119/2015
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
436.45
UNIFORMS
366740
022815
83.49
UNIFORMS
366740
022815
•
5210.6122
5510.6575
7410.6575
1400.6160
1550.6200
1550.6200
1550.6200
1550.6200
1375.6530
47083.6710
3101.6103
1400.6203
4607.6203
0
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
PRINTING ARENA ADMI N ISTRATI ON
PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION
DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
•
0
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 27
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
i
•
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392049
3119/2015
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
Continued...
519.94
392050
3/19/2015
125032 UNI- SELECT USA
556.30
PARTS
366615
022815
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
556.30
392051
3119/2015
101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
210.00
AIBO- PLUMBING COURSE
366971
GOVT0072
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
735.00
TRAINING CLASSES
366972
REF 121614
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
945.00
392052
3119/2015
102212 UPBEAT INC
16,896.28
RECYCLING RECEPTACLES 00001365
366879
560478
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
16,896.28
392053
3/19/2015
100050 USPS
4,000.00
ACCT # 03620836
366878
031215
1550.6235
POSTAGE
4,000.00
392054
3/1912015
100050 USPS
1,000.00
ACCT #202739
366973
031315TMS
1400.6235
POSTAGE
1,000.00
392066
3/19/2015
121037 VAN ALTVORST, JAY
74.97
UNIFORM PURCHASE
366614
030915
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
74.97
392056
3/19/2015
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
15.49
LIQUOR BAGS
366743
341533 -00
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
343.08
LIQUOR BAGS
366742
341636 -00
5822.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
88.39
TISSUE, CAN LINERS
366741
341640 -00
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
398.10
LIQUOR BAGS
366741
341640 -00
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
845.06
392057
3/1912015
102571 VGM CLUB
160.00
DUES
366880
190035 -3015
5410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
160.00
392058
3119/2015
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
560.70
RECEPTACLES, WASHERS, SENSOMB001539
366554
9106166
1322.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
0
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 27
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
392058 311912016 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY Continued...
560.70
392059 3/19/2015 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC.
366801 62941 5842.5513
392060
3/19/2015
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
134659
VOICE & DATA NETWORKS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
789.91
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
SHARED 911 NETWORK EQUIPT
366974
STDINV134958
2310.6710
789.91
392061
3119/2016
101069
VOSS LIGHTING
875.00
LIGHTING
00001300
366555
15259414 -01
1551.6406
252.48
RINK LIGHTS 00001559
366744
15261742 -00
1646.6578
1,127.48
392062
3/19/2016
101312
WINE MERCHANTS
266.32-
366693
701883
5862.5513
782.96
366692
7020657
5822.5513
1,011.12
366806
7021581
5842.5513
648.64
366805
7021582
5862.5513
204.32
367027
7021637
5842.5513
2,380.72
392063
3/19/2016
129166
WINKEL, BRANDON
395.00
FIRE INSPECTOR
TUITION
366975
REIMBURSE
1470.6104
395.00
392064
311912015
124291
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
6,655.33
366698
1080297875
5862.5513
1,265.37
366697
1080297876
5862.5512
1,532.34
366810
1080297877
5822.5513
131.15
366809
1080297878
5822.5512
1,065.57
366808
1080297879
5822.5512
1,067.77
366694
1080297880
5842.5513
3,522.38
366807
1080297881
5842.5512
133.35
366696
1080297882
5842.5515
131.24
366695
1080297883
5842.5512
15, 504.50
392065
3/1912015
124529
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC
•
0
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Page - 28
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LAMPS & FIXTURES
E911
CITY HALL GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
0
•
•
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 29
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 -
3/19/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392066 3/1912016
124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC
Continued...
1,574.45
366704
1090370755
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
920.65
366812
1090370756
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
23.10
366811
1090370757
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
623.45
366703
1090371014
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
673.60
366702
1090371015
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,003.30
366699
1090371745
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
246.00
366700
1090371746
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
46.20
366701
1090371747
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,005.85
367031
1090374060
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
172.20
367030
1090374071
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,400.65
367032
1090374131
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
147.60
367033
1090374132
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
23.10
367034
1090374133
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
3,377.29
367028
1090374134
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
324.00
367029
1090374135
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
15, 561.44
392066 3/1912015
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
153.00
BERMAN TRAFFIC STUDY
366556
1- 01686 -630
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
153.00
392067 3119/2015
101726 XCEL ENERGY
251.44
51- 6137136 -8
366561
447363992
5430.6185
LIGHT & POWER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
37.49
51- 0194596 -8
366557
447447069
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
18.35
51 -4151897 -6
366565
447521044
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,036.72
51- 6979948 -4
366560
447561172
5821.6185
LIGHT & POWER
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
1,385.24
51- 6979948 -4
366560
447561172
5861.6185
LIGHT & POWER
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1,711.35
51- 6979948 -4
366560
447561172
5841.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK OCCUPANCY
37.86
51- 7567037 -0
366562
447571676
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
541.76
51- 9422326 -6
366564
447591727
1322.61 B5
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
7,696.56
51- 0837548 -4
366559
447645029
5915.6185
LIGHT & POWER
WATER TREATMENT
3,650.96
61- 5888961 -7
366563
447725831
1375.6185
LIGHT & POWER
PARKING RAMP
545.91
51- 5619094 -8
366658
447888971
1552.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
5,550.97
51- 6121102 -5
366657
448067314
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,484.05
51- 6840050 -6
366659
448078018
5921.6185
LIGHT & POWER
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
743.44
51- 4197645 -8
366660
448084045
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
15.02
51- 8997917 -7
366986
448292975
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
21,385.44
51- 5605640 -1
366985
448434797
5911.6185
LIGHT & POWER
WELL PUMPS
2,213.37
51- 4966303 -6
366558
51- 4966303 -6
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
50,305.93
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/17/2015 13:48:23
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 30
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/19/2015 — 3/19/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392067
3119/2015
101726 XCEL ENERGY
Continued...
392068
3/1912015
101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC
1,534.00
REPLACEMENT BRUSHES 00002363
366914 0153615 -IN 5761.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
1,534.00
392069
3/1912015
100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
11,627.06
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
367048 1802824140026 9232.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
11,627.06
884,056.09
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
793,868.75
A/P ACH Payment
90,187.34
Total Payments
884,056.09
0 0
0
CITY OFA
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
Council Check Summary
3/19/2015 - 3/19/2015
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
400,584.03
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
6,042.43
03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND
450.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
1,902.64
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
12,310.00
05100 ART CENTER FUND
12,603.00
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
2,035.87
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
5,850.70
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
14,174.64
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
31,711.92
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND
4,835.00
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND
12,423.64
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND
5,873.50
05800 LIQUOR FUND
180,844.65
05900 UTILITY FUND
127,637.36
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
163.47
05950 RECYCLING FUND
36,187.38
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
7,622.35
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
11,627.06
09900 PAYROLL FUND
9,176.45
Report Totals
884,056.09
3/17/201i 3:48:30
Page- 1
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedures date
•
•
r
1 �
s
A
h
i
� �
I
t
i
1
�
�
F
•
•
R55CKR2 Lt1GIS101
367252
46967500
5862.5513
CITYRINA
VERNON SELLING
109.55
367254
47474300
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Council Check Register by GL
350.60
367256
47474500
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
367497
47474700
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
261.26
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
6528400
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
1105
312612015
185.44
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
91733400
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
158.42
44.00
91733700
367248
1875357 5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
107.60
223.50
367490
1876324 5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
03488.1705.21
151.60
223.50
1106
3/26/2015
3/26/2015
100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
12,497.00
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
367383
23270354.00 -212 5960.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5960.6103
5,281.50
PROMENADE GRANTAPP
367384
23271309.02 -2 9232.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1112
17,778.50
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
1107
3/26/2015
101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION
PCS FOR CONFERENCE ROOM 00004300
367054
RV87642
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 1
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
703.75
367252
46967500
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
109.55
367254
47474300
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
350.60
367256
47474500
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
36.55
367497
47474700
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
261.26
367498
6528400
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
263.81
367253
91699200
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
185.44
367255
91733400
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
158.42
367496
91733700
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1108
3/26/2015
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
11.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009400
367388
WO- 101437 -1
5110.6513
11.36
1109
3/26/2015
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
991.88
EASEL, STATION SUPPLIES 00003585
367390
106593
1470.6406
991.88
1110
3/26/2015
132444 BOLTON & MENK INC.
223.50
TRUNK SEWER REHAB
367126
0175541
03488.1705.21
223.50
1111
3/26/2015
-
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
1,126.00
GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
367127
B023685
5960.6103
1,126.00
1112
3/26/2015
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
617.45
PCS FOR CONFERENCE ROOM 00004300
367054
RV87642
1554.6710
617.44
PCS FOR CONFERENCE ROOM 00004300
367054
RV87642
421130.6710
697.00
WIFI AT BRAEMAR FIELD
367055
SD61623
4413.6103
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONSULTING INSPECTION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Countryside H Reconstruction
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11.21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 2
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 -
3/26/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1112 3/26/2015
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
Continued...
79.63
PCR TABLET ACCESSORIES
00004307
367056
SF81586
1470.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
317.38
PCR TABLET ACCESSORIES
00004307
367057
SG12659
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
236.52
IPAD CASES
00004315
367397
SV74331
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
77.53
MOUNTING KIT
00004314
367058
SV77997
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
82.28
CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPLY
00004318
367060
SZ02184
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
246.84
ELEC PLAN REVIEW SUPPLIES
00004318
367060
SZ02184
4612.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FD Plan Review Software
82.28
CONFERENCE ROOM SUPPLY
00004318
367060
SZ02184
421130.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
169.53
KEYBOARDS FOR PCR TABLETS
00004318
367059
SZ13650
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
272.68
PRINTER FOR MOTORCYCLE
00004320
367061
SZ53741
421400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE EQUIPMENT
67.13
TABLET MOUNT PARTS
00004314
367110
SZ62053
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
3,122.15
TECH UPGRADES
00004322
367111
TB65889
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
6,685.84
1113 3/2612015
117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD
496.00
IPC DISPLAY BOARD
367177
518266
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
709.00
CLEANING CHEMICALS
367178
518295
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1,205.00
1114 3126/2016
130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
396.00
367264
163856
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
396.00
1116 3/26/2016
104020 DALCO
927.57
ICE MELT
00001525
367128
2852272
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
356.38
CAN LINERS, CLEANER, TISSUE
00009398
367406
2857797
5111.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
71.37
GOJO HAND SOAP
00009398
367407
2859466
5111.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
664.52
VAN VALKENBURG SUPPLIES
00001628
367129
2861383
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,179.52
ROLL WIPES, TOWELS, CLEANERS
00001627
367181
2861964
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,199.36
1116 3/26/2016
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
220.00
367268
794696
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,429.45
367266
794697
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
97.20
367265
794698
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
116.80
367269
794699
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
826.50
367270
794700
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
78.60
367267
795086
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
3,768.55
1117 3126/2016 134730 EXPLORE EDINA
• • •
• CITY ONA
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1117 3/2612015 134730 EXPLORE EDINA Continued...
25,691.39 FEB 2015 LODGING TAX 367522 032315 1001.4030 LODGING TAX
1.817.48
3/24/2U15 11:21:15
Page- 3
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMI N ISTRATI ON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
25,691.39
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1118
3/2612015
120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC.
425.00
ROWAY
367131
2465365
1263.6103
425.00
1119
3126/2015
129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING
CO.
80.00
367273
11502
5842.5514
40.00
367274
11524
5842.5514
120.00
1120
3/26/2015
100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG
INC
1,156.00
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
367188
15168
5510.6103
1,156.00
1121
3/26/2015
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
35.74
PAINT
00001418
367138
03133939
1470.6406
43.59
PAINT
00001432
367139
03134102
1301.6406
60.12
PAINT, BRUSHES
00001518
367140
03135924
1551.6406
76.28
PAINT
00001618
367415
03138271
1301.6406
82.22-
INVOICE 03120713 PAID TWICE
367141
CREDIT ON ACCT
5410.6406
133.51
1122
3126/2015
130160 IDC AUTOMATIC
338.25
OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIRS
367195
D295719 -IN
1470.6180
338.25
1123
312612015
102146 JESSEN PRESS
133.00
LETTERHEAD
367416
668130
5110.6513
133.00
1124
312612015
121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC.
66.50
TOILET RENTAL
367198
86435
1645.6182
66.50
1126
3/2612015
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
1,087.47
367506
192360
5822.5515
730.01
367505
192364
5862.5515
1.817.48
3/24/2U15 11:21:15
Page- 3
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMI N ISTRATI ON
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OFEDINA
3/24/201511:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 4
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 -- 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1125
312612015
112577 M.AMUNDSONLLP
Continued...
1126
3/26/2015
101483 MENARDS
87.18
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
00008031
367203
79419
5520.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
ARENA CONCESSIONS
9.47
NUTSETTER, WASHER
00001567
367204
80171
5511.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
219.74
PORTABLE VAC, SUPPLIES
00008034
367205
80444
5511.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
517.96
LUMBER, METAL PLATES
00001495
367085
80803
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
32.96
SHOWER WANDS
00001612
367144
80809
1643.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
15.30
THRESHOLD
00001623
367145
80889
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
164.60
LUMBER, NAILS
00001634
367146
80980
47085.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD
1,394.73
SCREWS, TRIM, CEDAR, FASCIA
00001636
367206
81186
47085.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD
448.34
WATER HEATER
00001638
367423
81258
47085.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD
168.00
LEDGERLOK, BIMETAL
00001680
367422
81266
47065.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD
128.16
CEDAR, SAW BLADE
00001683
367425
81329
1318.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
50.31
PAINT, SUPPLIES
00001689
367424
81341
1646.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
64.70
BUILDING SUPPLIES
00001696
367426
81421
47085.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD
3,301.45
1127
3/26/2015
101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
439.00
TOWELS, TISSUE, DETERGENT
367429
36258
1470.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
439.00
1128
3/26/2015
106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
991.38
TABLE COVERS
367439
330107
5720.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
991.38
1129
3/2612015
121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC.
2,297.76
FINAL PAYMENT
367149
5- 108 -2/15
07120.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
S120 School Road
1,750.68
FINAL PAYMENT
367149
S- 108 -2/15
5924.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER
1,422.42
FINAL PAYMENT
367149
5- 108 -2/15
5960.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
5,470.86
1130
3/26/2015
116669 ON CALL SERVICES
430.63
TENSION TIES, BRACKET
367445
2530
5720.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
430.63
1131
3/26/2016
129486 PAPCO INC.
158.70
TOWELS, WINDOW CLEANER
357449
91519
7411.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
158.70
1132
3/26/2015
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE
INC.
•
•
•
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 5
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CONTINGENCIES
CONTINGENCIES
ARENA ICE MAINT
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS
•
•
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1132
312612015
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
Continued...
1,034.29
TIRES, TIRE REPAIRS 00005132
367092
210163085
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,034.29
1133
3/26/2015
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
408.83
TOWELS, GLOVES, TISSUE PAPER 00002170
367454
7631
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
576.30
TOWELS, LINERS, SOAP
367220
7633
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
495.58
CHANGING STATIONS
367221
7641
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
628.75
LINERS, GLOVES, SOAP
367222
7642
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
2,109.46
1134
3/26/2015
106690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC.
1,613.23
EVIDENCE ROOM CAMERA
367452
69143
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,533.23
EVIDENCE ROOM OFFICE CAMERA
367453
69152
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,146.46
1135
3126/2015
100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN
INC.
258.93
GOAL PEGS
367224
0056975 -IN
5521.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
308.00
SERVICE CALL ON ZAMBONI
367225
0057033 -IN
5511.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
566.93
1136
3/26/2016
101000 RJM PRINTING INC.
107.50
BUSINESS CARDS
367226
85339
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
147.80
ENVELOPES
367227
85363
1550.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
255.30
1137
3/26/2016
101004 SPS COMPANIES
19.09
PIPE SEALANT 00001599
367158
S3052219.001
1301.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
19.09
1138
312612015
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
37.06
ACTUATOR 00005205
367097
64063
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
37.06
1139
312612015
103277 TITAN MACHINERY
263.57
EDGE, BOLTS 00006297
367100
1679684
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
21.68
RETURN EDGE, NEW EDGE 00006297
367101
1680781
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
285.25
1140
3126/2016
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS
381.33
50TH BRIDGE SCOUR REPAIR
367160
002015000476
1346.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 5
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CONTINGENCIES
CONTINGENCIES
ARENA ICE MAINT
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
367353
0119885 -IN
CITY OF EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
288.75
367356
0120335 -IN
Council Check Register by GL
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
162.50
367357
0120336 -IN
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
163.50
367354
0120337 -IN
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
1140
3/26/2015
367511
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS
PLANNERS
Continued...
VERNON SELLING
381.33
1,083.80
367361
1141
312612015
101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS
367362
387861 -00
745.99
POS PRINTERS
367102 52905 5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
387873 -00
745.99
3,101.90
1142
3/26/2015
3/20/2015
119454 VINOCOPIA
118580 CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 6
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
356.67
367353
0119885 -IN
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
288.75
367356
0120335 -IN
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
162.50
367357
0120336 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
163.50
367354
0120337 -IN
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
162.00
367355
0120338 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
VERNON SELLING
132.00
367511
0120339 -IN
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1143
3/26/2015
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
120627 VISTAR CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE
50TH ST SELLING
1,149.37
CONCESSION PRODUCT
367239
41854685
426.88
CONCESSION PRODUCT
367240
41910018
1,576.25
1144
3/26/2015
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
1,099.80
367359
387743 -00
1,083.80
367361
387859 -00
400.40
367362
387861 -00
517.90
367360
387873 -00
3,101.90
392070
3/20/2015
118580 CITY OF EDINA
4,095.39
PERMIT ED129958
367164
031815
4,095.39
392071
3/26/2015
125324 3M
71.25
SAFETY GLASSES
367122
02188852
71.25
392072
3126/2015
101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC
17.46
NIPPLE, CLAMPS
367123
1- 865069
238.83
HOSE REPAIR 00001632
367165
1- 865186
256.29
•
5520.5510
5520.5510
5842.5513
5862.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE
50TH ST SELLING
47083.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1648.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
•
•
0
CREDIT
ONA
300000798
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
CITY
17,190.37
SHOES
367051
Council Check Register by GL
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
SOCKS
367050
900256152
3/20/2015 — 3/26/2015
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
Check # Date
Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392073 3/2612015
105476 ACE TRAILER SALES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
Continued...
30.00 VENT MATERIAL FOR TRAILER
00001533 367124 5035603 1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
392076
30.00
105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
392074 3/26/2015
135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY
0
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 7
Business Unit
STREET NAME SIGNS
7,131.00-
CREDIT
367052
300000798
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17,190.37
SHOES
367051
900237141
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
485.77
SOCKS
367050
900256152
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,913.04
GOLF GLOVES
367049
900256153
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
A255 WOODDALE BIKE RE- STRIPING
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
13,458.18
392075
3/26/2015
130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC.
1,346.25
EVALUATION STUDY
367125
55792
01255.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
1,346.25
392076
3/26/2015
105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
216.60
COFFEE
367380
128405
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
216.60
392077
3/26/2015
103286 AMEM
130.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES
367381
9019E26DFE
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
130.00
392078
3/26/2015
127366 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY
84.32
AIR DRYER CARTRIDGE 00005167
367053
AFS- 250680007
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
84.32
392079
3/26/2015
136000 AMERISURE INS. CO.
1,292.71
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
367107
RICHARD PETRON
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
1,292.71
392080
3126/2015
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
670.30
CONCESSION PRODUCT
367382
503200510
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
670.30
392081
3126/2015
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
304.00
367250
3022619
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
160.00
367491
3022620
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1,032.75
367493
3022621
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1,128.00
367249
3022622
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1,363.80
367492
3022623
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
A255 WOODDALE BIKE RE- STRIPING
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392081
3126/2015
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
Continued...
9.00-
367251
310016
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
7.98-
367495
310027
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
60.00-
367494
310028
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
3,911.57
392082
312612015
136028 ASCO SERVICES INC.
7,291.77
REPLACEMENT PANEL VIEWS
00001591
367475
972211
5912.6530
REPAIR PARTS
7,291.77
392083
3/26/2015
102196 BATTERIES PLUS
114.50
BATTERIES
00003143
367476
018 - 366990
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
89.97
BATTERIES
00001697
367386
018 - 367082
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
52.97
BATTERY CHARGER
00001698
367385
018 - 367083
5921.6530
REPAIR PARTS
257.44
392084
3/26/2015
101343 BEHR, JASON
171.00
K9 BOARDING
367477
032315
4607.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
171.00
392085
3/26/2015
131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
216.00
PIZZA
367387
D2813243
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
216.00
392086
3/26/2016
126139 BERNICK'S
100.10
367166
200613
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
60.00
367257
205090
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
465.45
367258
205091
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
677.45
367259
205092
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
253.30
367499
205093
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
392087 3/2612015 135993 BERUBE, SHEILA
216.90 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 367108 ELIZABETH
216.90
392088 3/26/2016 132606 BLUE CARD - HENN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN
425.00 BLUE CARD TRAINING 367389 15-002
425.00
392089 3/26/2015 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
•
1470.4329
1EVI X-1111dI
AMBULANCE FEES
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 8
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
WELL HOUSES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
ARENA CONCESSIONS
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
392092
0
102911 BROOKS, JOHN
ONA
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367468
031815
1470.6107
CITY
35.94
392093
3/26/2015
Council Check Register by GL
100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION
3,000.00
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
032015
1556.6121
3,000.00
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392089
3/26/2015
367478
101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
2310.6406
Continued...
311.76
WARMING HOUSE LIGHTS
00001505
367167
908982853
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
311.76
2,776.50-
CREDIT
367396
925630847
5440.5511
392090
3/2612015
142.26
105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL
LLC
925742460
5440.5511
375.08
GOLF CLUB
12.72-
CREDIT
5440.5511
367170
70206349
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
367393
925782735
638.71
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003896
367168
81701563
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
5440.5511
1,073.64
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
GOLF CLUBS
367169
81713735
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
1,574.41
117.29
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003897
367171
81720457
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
136020 CALUMET PACKAGING
472.11
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003898
367172
81721708
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
442.99
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003898
367174
81723157
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
728.62
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003899
367173
81723158
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
3,460.64
392091
3/26/2015
119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
290.50
367260
125454
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
243.00
367261
125465
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
392092
3126/2015
102911 BROOKS, JOHN
35.94
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367468
031815
1470.6107
35.94
392093
3/26/2015
100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION
3,000.00
BACKGROUND CHECKS
367175
032015
1556.6121
3,000.00
392094
3126/2015
100391 CALL ONE INC.
136.31
E911 DISPATCH EQUIPMENT
367478
562441
2310.6406
136.31
392095
312612015
102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
2,776.50-
CREDIT
367396
925630847
5440.5511
142.26
GOLF CLUB
367391
925742460
5440.5511
375.08
GOLF CLUB
367392
925770860
5440.5511
419.95
GOLF CLUBS
367393
925782735
5440.5511
121.81
PUTTER
367394
925794906
5440.5511
3,291.81
GOLF CLUBS
367395
925806387
5440.5511
1,574.41
392096
3/2612015
136020 CALUMET PACKAGING
0
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 9
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES E911
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by
Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 -
3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392096
3/2612015
136020 CALUMET PACKAGING
Continued...
260.00
TRUFUEL 00003582
367176
644619
1553.6581
GASOLINE
260.00
TRUFUEL 00003582
367176
644619
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
520.00
392097
3/2612015
136001 CAMPBELL, DOROTHY
1.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
367109
031715
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
1.00
392098
3/26/2015
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
8,083.67
367262
534862
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
558.95
367263
538616
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
8,642.62
392099
3/26/2015
103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC.
8,580.17
367399
3007482
5720.6186
HEAT
83.00
367398
3007792
5311.6186
HEAT
8,663.17
392100
312612015
123898 CENTURYLINK
156.58
952 285 -2951
367062
2951 -3/15
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
60.15
952 944 -6522
367400
6522 -3/15
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
216.73
392101
3/2612016
136786 CITY HOMES DEVELOPMENT LLC
132,618.00
REDUCTION OF CASH ESCROW
367402
031815
1000.2066
ESCROW DEPOSITS
132,618.00
392102
3/2612015
122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES
100.17
00110793 - 0155250018
367066
0155250018 -3/15
5422.6189
SEWER & WATER
93.34
00110793- 0173001001
367065
0173001001 -3/15
5210.6189
SEWER & WATER
382.09
00113667- 0120635016
367401
120835016 -3/15
5111.6189
SEWER & WATER
3,673.64
00110793 - 0155200000
367063
155200000 -3/15
5420.6189
SEWER & WATER
54.58
00110793- 0155250009
367067
155250009 -3/15
5422.6189
SEWER & WATER
54.58
00110793- 0173001000
367064
173001000 =3/15
5424.6189
SEWER & WATER
4,358.40
392103
3/26/2015
129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
819.99
APR 2015 MAINTENANCE
367179
040115
5841.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
819.99
•
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 10
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
POOL OPERATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
CLUB HOUSE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RANGE
YORK OCCUPANCY
0
0
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 11
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
PARKING RAMP
A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
INSPECTIONS
FINANCE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 — 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392104
3/26/2015
120433 COMCAST
Continued...
13.52
8772 10 614 0373022
367479
373022 -3115
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
141.46
8772 10 614 0496856
367403
496856 -3/15
5210.6188
TELEPHONE
80.61
8772 10 614 0540232
367068
540232 -3/15
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
235.59
392105
3/26/2015
101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
1,969.12
REIMBURSE OVERAGE PAYMENT
367404
113
01238.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
1,969.12
392106
3/26/2016
100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
855.13
CLAY 00009396
367405
INV000097034
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
855.13
392107
3/26/2015
134650 CRAWFORD, LINDY
81.07
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
367069
031615
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
15.00
MEETING FEE
367480
APMP
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
96.07
392108
3/26/2015
100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC.
544.00
PUMP SUMP
367180
106047
1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
544.00
392109
3/26/2016
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
110.00
HOSE TUBE BATTERY 00001488
367130
945802
1301.6556
TOOLS
110.00
392110
3126/2015
100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
9,554.10
FEB 2015 SURCHARGE
367408
21940053060
1495.4380
SURCHARGE
9,554.10
392111
3/26/2015
104314 DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING
CORP., THE
1,092.00
AUDIT COMFIRM
367182
4534
1160.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,092.00
392112
3/2612015
121103 DIRECTV
78.53
CABLE
367409
25355843168
7411.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
78.53
392113
3/26/2015
118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC.
48.10
STEEL SUPPLIES
367183
01073076
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 11
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
PARKING RAMP
A -238 TRANSIT LIVABLE COMM TLC
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
INSPECTIONS
FINANCE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 12
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392113
3/26/2015
118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC.
Continued...
48.10
392114
3126/2015
136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S.
119.50
EDINAACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
367481
032315
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
545.00
EDINAACTIVITIES DIRECTORY
367481
032315
1600.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKADMIN. GENERAL
664.50
392115
3/26/2015
132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
39.10
PUBLISH NOTICE
367072
196731
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
173.14
PUBLISH ORD 2015 -04
367071
196732
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
78.19
PUBLISH ORD 2015 -03
367070
196733
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
55.85
PUBLISH ORD 2015 -01
367073
196734
1185.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
417.00
JOB ADVERTISING
367184
197845
1556.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
763.28
392116
3126/2015
125415 EHMILLER, DAVID
20.34
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367469
031815
1470.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
20.34
392117
3/26/2015
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC.
229.50
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
367410
1722870
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
229.50
392118
3/26/2016
136021 EPIC SOLUTIONS
408.65
VACUUM HOSE 00001532
367185
2763
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
408.65
392119
3/26/2015
104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC.
69.80
367500
266 -697
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
104.70
367272
W- 1144757
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
139.60
367271
W 1144758
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
314.10
392120
3/26/2015
100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE
91.49
COFFEE
367074
61659602
5410.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
91.49
392121
3/26/2015
122549 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY
590.45
CONCESSION PRODUCT
367186
3772696
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA CONCESSIONS
515.55
CONCESSION PRODUCT
367187
3794871
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA CONCESSIONS
0
R55CKR2 L101 CITY OF 1NA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
392121 312612015 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY
1,106.00
392122 3/2612015 100756 FEDEX
18.01 SHIPPING CHARGES
18.01
392123 3/26/2015 113987 FISHER, PETER
39.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
39.16
392124 3/26/2015 136023 FRIENDS OF THE INSTITUTE
350.00 EDINAART CENTER AD
350.00
367112 2- 962 -04679 1400.6235
367470 031815 1470.6107
367411 ART IN BLOOM 5110.6122
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
POSTAGE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ADVERTISING OTHER
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 13
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
392125 3/26/2015
101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
1,387.50
APPAREL
367075
40937286
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,387.50
392126 3/26/2015
100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION
68.05
SKATE SUPPLIES
367189
88905
5510.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
ARENAADMINISTRATION
68.05
392127 3/2612016
101103 GRAINGER
104.10
WASHERS, AVIATION SNIPS
00001417
367136
9651654155
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
176.02
DRUM DOLLY
00001561
367135
9678264152
1325.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
7.39
RISER CLAMPS
00005198
367077
9684901195
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
112.70
STAINLESS STEEL TEES
00005198
367076
9664901219
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
146.34
SEALS
00005101
367133
9686342800
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.12
SAFETY GLASSES
00005138
367078
9686832628
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
941.76
NITRILE GLOVES, GOGGLES
00001614
367192
9687252305
1643.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
43.76
RESPIRATORS
00001614
367190
9687252313
1643.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
152.08
LIGHT BULBS
00002180
367412
9687525049
5720.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
43.76
RESPIRATORS
00001614
367191
9687951005
1643.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GENERAL TURF CARE
32.88
SAFETY GLASSES
00005140
367079
9688168948
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
174.68
PRESSURE WASHER
00001630
367134
9688895201
5923.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
45.38
EAR PLUGS
00005142
367132
9689190677
1553.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
45.38
EAR PLUGS
00005142
367132
9689190677
1646.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
100.00
EAR PLUGS
00005142
367132
9689190677
1301.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
45.40
EAR PLUGS
00005142
367132
9689190677
5913.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
2,187.75
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 14
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392127
3126/2015
101103 GRAINGER
Continued...
392128
3126/2015
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
2,067.00
367275
179151
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
98.25
367276
179153
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,165.25
392129
3/26/2015
101504 HADZIMA, DOMINIC
42.88
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367471
031815
1470.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
42.88
392130
3/26/2015
102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC
42.20
LIGHT BULBS 00001608
367137
139409 -1
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
42.20
392131
3/2612015
103835 HANRAHAN, BRIAN
29.26
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367472
031815
1470.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
29.26
392132
3126/2015
134828 HANSON PLUMBING CO. INC.
400.00
INSTALL REALICE WATER SYSTEM
367193
2644
5521.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA ICE MAINT
400.00
392133
3/26/2015
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
286.54
PRINTER FOR SIGN SHOP 00004321
367080
55594288
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
16.00
SPEAKERS 00004319
367081
55594420
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
32.00
SPEAKERS 00004319
367081
55594420
1495.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
48.00
SPEAKERS 00004319
367081
55594420
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
382.54
392134
3126/2015
103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS
172.45
SOAP, CLEANERS 00002177
367414
601527651
5720.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
70.25
VAC BAGS 00002183
367413
601533253
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
242.70
392135
3/2612015
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
880.75
367279
752364
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
58.00
367278
752365
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,221.63
367277
752399
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,545.50
367280
752526
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
3,705.88
•
•
•
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 15
Business Unit
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
0
367281
27319
5842.5514
R55CKR2 L101
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
392139 3126/2015
128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
510.00
OFFICIATING FEES
367196
3120/2015 - 3/26/2015
1621.6103
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392135
3/2612015
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
392140 312612015
Continued...
392136
3/26/2015
126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
--
196.98
CONCRETE, LUMBER
367194 021315 47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
196.98
31.12
367197
392137
3/26/2015
GENERAL SUPPLIES
101146 IMPACT TELECOM
90.29
367197
357.47
1470.6106
367482 608341793 1554.6188
TELEPHONE
141.45
357.47
392138
3/26/2016
392141 3/26/2016
131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 15
Business Unit
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
320.00
367281
27319
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
320.00
392139 3126/2015
128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION LLC
510.00
OFFICIATING FEES
367196
499
1621.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
510.00
392140 312612015
100828 JERRY'S FOODS
20.04
367197
022815
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
31.12
367197
022815
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
90.29
367197
022815
1470.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
141.45
392141 3/26/2016
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
3,461.25
367287
2334889
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
57.80
367286
2334890
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,192.10
367284
2334891
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17.55
367285
2334892
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
4,571.34
367282
2334896
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
35.10
367283
2334897
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
239.40
367417
2348637
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
10, 574.54
392142 3/26/2015
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
1,263.44
367318
5112745
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
276.15
367317
5112749
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
91.36
367299
5117942
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
277.88
367503
5117943
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
211.01
367304
5117944
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
715.04
367502
5117945
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL Page - 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392142 3/26/2015
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
Continued...
1.16
367313
5117946
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2.32
367298
5117947
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
550.80
367501
5117948
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
65.66
367302
5117949
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
.58
367309
5117950
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
976.20
367303
5117951
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
69.62
367300
5117952
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
61.91
367301
5117953
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
91.36
367315
5117955
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,570.85
367312
5117956
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
469.08
367316
5117957
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,829.06
367314
5117958
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WANE
1,018.65
367307
5117959
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,735.78
367311
5117960
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE
2,063.40
367305
5117961
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
62.82
367306
5117962
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
6,500.90
367310
5117963
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
69.62
367308
5117964
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
91.36
367290
5117965
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,428.60
367296
5117966
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
223.19
367294
5117967
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
3,186.84
367297
5117968
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
897.18
367293
5117969
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
1,038.88
367295
5117970
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,700.41
367292
5117971
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
62.82
367291
5117972
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
2,705.01
367288
5117973
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
69.62
367289
5117974
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
12.41-
367504
517606
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
33,366.15
392143 3126/2015
100553 KEEHR, GREGORY
28.45
MEETING SUPPLIES
367418
032015
5860.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
28.47
MEETING SUPPLIES
367418
032015
5820.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
28.47
MEETING SUPPLIES
367418
032015
5840.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
85.39
392144 312612015
119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC.
573.54
ROCK 00001658
367419
242712
5913.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
573.54
•
0
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
•
R55CKR2 L�101
CITYOFEDINA
3/24/2.11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 17
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392144
3/26/2015
119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC.
Continued...
392145
3126/2015
120982 KROOG, RACHEL
200.00
EP PERFORMANCE 4/02/15
367113
031815
5710.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
200.00
392146
3/26/2015
119802 LAVENTURE, ANDREW
11.21
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367199
031815
1470.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
225.00
EMT REFRESHER
367199
031815
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
236.21
392147
3/2612015
100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
305.52
NYLON ZIP TIES 00005971
367142
9303058707
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE
813.11
BOLTS, FITTINGS, COUPLERS 00005134
367082
9303124131
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
320.01
NUTS, WASHERS, DRILL BITS 00001629
367201
9303134279
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
414.85
NUTS, WASHERS, DRILL BITS . 00005103
367200
9303135761
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,853.49
392148
3126/2015
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
20.00
SAFETY & LOSS WORKSHOP
367420
215298
1170.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
HUMAN RESOURCES
20.00
392149
3126/2015
135867 LIBATION PROJECT
635.50
367319
483
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
635.50
392150
3/26/2015
136027 LINA
3,979.00
MAR 2015 LTD PREMIUM
367483
0416005118
9900.2033.16
LTD - 99
PAYROLL CLEARING
3,979.00
392151
3/2612015
135277 LOCATORS & SUPPLIES INC.
137.77
SAFETY SUPPLIES
367143
0231888 -IN
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
137.77
392152
3/26/2015
100858 LOGIS
630.63
367084
39791,39867,398
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
83
630.81
367084
39791,39867,398
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
83
3,670.73
367084
39791,39867,398
1495.6160
DATA PROCESSING
INSPECTIONS
83
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 — 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392152
3/26/2015
100858 LOGIS
Continued...
4,045.21
367084
39791,39867,398
1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
FINANCE
83
4,519.83
367084
39791,39867,398
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
83
5,976.70
367084
39791,39867,398
1556.6160
DATA PROCESSING
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
83
13,397.94
367084
39791,39867,398
1190.6160
DATA PROCESSING
ASSESSING
83
5,942.65
367084
39791,39867,398
5902.6160
DATA PROCESSING
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
83
315.00
IT CONSULTING
367083
39845
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,327.50
IT CONSULTING
367083
39845
421554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT
40,457.00
392153
3/26/2015
122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA
520.00
HOSTING FEES
367421
204
1130.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
520.00
392154
312612016
122664 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC.
191.16
OXYGEN 00003649
367202
10946370
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
191.16
392166
3/26/2016
102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC
180.00
MOVE FAX LINE
367484
78551
5410.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
180.00
392156
3/2612015
136029 MCCOLLISTER, ROBERT
120.00
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
367485
6704 BRITTANY
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
RD
392157 3/2612016
104.10
104.10
392168 3/26/2016
142.50
114.00
256.50
101987 MENARDS
CLOCK, BLEACH, LAUNDRY SOAP 00002182 367427 64308 5720.6406
102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
OFFICIATING FEES 367207 4720 1621.6103
OFFICIATING FEES 367208 4743 1621.6103
0 0
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
•
•
•
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 19
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392159
3/26/2015
104650 MICRO CENTER
Continued...
3.99
SPUTTER
367209
5424974
1130.6410
VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
3.99
392160
3126/2015
100019 MIDWEST ART FAIRS
69.93
CONSIGNMENT SALES
367428
8836
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
69.93
392161
312612015
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
2,318.75
REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001648
367430
34904
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,656.25
00001647
367431
34905
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,126.25
00001649
367432
34906
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
5,101.25
392162
3/2612015
127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.
5.36
WINDOW WASHING
367433
928035937
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
5.36
392163
3/2612015
102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC.
134.70
SWIVEL CASTER WHEELS 00001545
367147
14405
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
134.70
392164
3/2612015
118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS
70.00
SWJ PAPER INSERTS
367086
157555
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
70.00
SWJ PAPER INSERTS
367086
157555
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
70.00
SWJ PAPER INSERTS
367086
157555
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
210.00
392165
3/26/2015
101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK
ASSOC
2,175.00
SAFETY INSPECTOR COURSE
367210
8490
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,175.00
392166
3/26/2015
128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
211.00
GOLF BROCHURES
367435
16887
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
128.93
HEALTH BROCHURES
367437
16911
1490.6575
PRINTING
PUBLIC HEALTH
49.00
WINTER WARM -UP POSTERS
367211
16912
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
49.00
MUSIC IN EDINA POSTERS
367211
16912
2611.6575
PRINTING
MUSIC IN EDINA
297.00
GOLFBROCHURES
367436
17004
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
263.66
UNCORKED LIQUOR FLYERS
367163
17007
5842.6575
PRINTING
YORK SELLING
263.67
UNCORKED LIQUOR FLYERS
367163
17007
5862.6575
PRINTING
VERNON SELLING
263.67
UNCORKED LIQUOR FLYERS
367163
17007
5822.6575
PRINTING
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
3,270.24
CITY OF EDINA
392170
3/26/2015
101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC.
Council Check Register by GL
381.50
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
1470.6552
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
381.50
3/20/2015 -- 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392166
3/26/2015
128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
SRO TRAINING 367118
16476MN
Continued...
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
49.00
WELLNESS FAIR POSTERS
367212
17154 1470.6614
FIRE PREVENTION
392172
56.00
AUTHOR'S STUDIO POSTERS
367212
17154 5110.6575
PRINTING
97.00
EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER
367087
17247 1130.6575
PRINTING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1,727.93
666.74
392167
3/26/2015
3/26/2015
102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING
100.00
ELEVATOR LICENSE
367434
ALR00482781 5510.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
100.00
299.00
392168
3/26/2016
392174
126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN
136002 NELSON, IRENE
240.00
CONFERENCE FEES
367116
SEPT 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
2,560.00
CONFERENCE FEES
367116
SEPT 1401.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
2,800.00
3/26/2015
131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING
392169
3126/2015
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 20
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNICATIONS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 367114 78295558 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911
1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 367115 78295559 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
0 0 0
3,270.24
392170
3/26/2015
101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC.
381.50
MASK BAGS 00003563 367213
00610304_SNV
1470.6552
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
381.50
392171
3126/2015
135999 NATIONAL ASSOC SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS
395.00
SRO TRAINING 367118
16476MN
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
395.00
392172
3/26/2015
127547 NEAL, SCOTT H.
666.74
CONFERENCE EXPENSES 367088
031615
1120.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
666.74
392173
3/26/2015
123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING
299.00
EDINAART CENTER ADS 367438
674930
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
299.00
392174
3/26/2016
136002 NELSON, IRENE
1,482.80
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 367117
031815
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
1,482.80
392176
3/26/2015
131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
0 0 0
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 21
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392175
3/26/2015
131449 NEUTGENS EXCAVATING
Continued...
290.00
HYDRANT RENTAL REFUND
367440
031815
5901.4626
SALE OF WATER
UTILITY REVENUES
290.00
392176
3/2612015
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
105.50
367320
98303
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
105.50
392177
3/26/2015
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
155.28
CLEAR SHEETING 00001499
367148
TI- 0282681
1325.6531
SIGNS & POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
155.28
392178
3/26/2015
104350 NIKE USA INC.
463.45
SHIRTS
367089
969361414
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
101.48
CAPS
367090
969383956
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
564.93
392179
3/26/2015
136003 NORBY, PAT
47.50
ART CLASS REFUND
367119
7343
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
47.50
392180
3/2612015
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
179.98
WHITE BOARD
367214
754987867001
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENAADMINISTRATION
73.51
OFFICE SUPPLIES
367215
757934702001
5510.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENAADMINISTRATION
93.56
MERCHANDISING SUPPLIES
367441
759444463001
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
347.05
392181
3/26/2015
102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES
24.69
367442
W15020648
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
24.69
367442
W15020648
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
49.38
367442
W15020648
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
74.07
367442
W15020648
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
74.07
367442
W15020648
1481.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK FIRE STATION
172.83
367442
W15020648
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
271.59
367442
W15020648
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
49.38
367442
W15020648
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
24.69
367442
W15020648
5311.6188
TELEPHONE
POOL OPERATION
98.76
367442
W15020648
5410.6188
TELEPHONE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
111.10
367442
W15020648
5710.6188
TELEPHONE
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
111.11
367442
W15020648
5760.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
49.38
367442
W15020648
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
392181
3126/2015
102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES
Continued...
74.07
367442
W15020648
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
74.07
367442
W15020648
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
49.38
367442
W15020648
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
260.70
367443
W15020653
5420.6168
TELEPHONE
1, 593.96
392182
3/26/2015
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
584.58
367152
554742
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
82.40
CHAIN 00001555
367150
555385
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
584.58-
367153
555397
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
456.01
CHAIN, PARTS 00005087
367151
555399
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
89.75
ZIPLINE ROPE 00002150
367444
555496
5311.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
72.40
CHAIN 00001625
367216
556082
1648.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
700.56
392183
3/26/2015
101659 ORKIN
142.22
PEST CONTROL
367446
101255615
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
142.22
392184
312612016
104960 PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC.
140.00
LEAD TEST ANALYSIS
367447
1500071
7412.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
140.00
392186
3/26/2015
134008 PANDORA MEDIA INC.
333.33
ADVERTISING
367448
SIN166348
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
333.33
ADVERTISING
367448
SIN166348
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
333.34
ADVERTISING
367448
SIN166348
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1,000.00
392186
3126/2015
100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
289.00-
367508
8480513 -CM
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,489.89
367321
8491050 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
209.56
367322
8491056 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,305.14
367323
8491060 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
37.81
367507
B491292 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2,753.40
392187
3/26/2016
100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
469.70
367324
46160786
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
458.02
367217
47741001
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 22
Business Unit
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
POOL OPERATION
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
PSTF RANGE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
ARENA CONCESSIONS
•
s •
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
392187 3/2612015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued...
183.72 367450 47741154 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
392188 3/2612015 131339 PETROVIC, FRANK
64.36 HARD DRIVE 367216 REIMBURSE 1130.6410
4607.6406
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 23
Business Unit
GRILL
VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
GENERALSUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
64.36
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
392189
3/26/2015
50TH ST SELLING
135849 PETSMART #2412
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
95.09
K9 FOOD, SUPPLIES
367486
T -1983
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
95.09
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
392190
3/26/2015
YORK SELLING
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
.09
5862.5512
367325
2755805
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
125.49
367329
2759292
506.95
367510
2759293
334.32
367331
2759294
83.32
367509
2759295
213.82
367333
2759296
.20
367328
2759297
1,149.58
367332
2759299
445.55
367334
2759300
921.36
367335
2759301
1,847.19
367330
2759302
561.79
367326
2759303
1,276.12
367327
2759304
7,467.78
392191
312612016
100119 PING
124.65
HATS
367091
12676794
124.65
392192
3/26/2015
130926 PLANTSCAPE INC.
2,223.86
PLANT MAINTENANCE
367451
329033
2,223.86
392193
3/26/2016
100961 POSTMASTER - LISPS
5,850.32
ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE
367162
031815
5,850.32
392194
3/26/2015
102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE
CO.
4607.6406
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 23
Business Unit
GRILL
VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
GENERALSUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
1130.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 24
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 — 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392194
3/26/2015
102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO.
Continued...
1,582.31
ELM TREE REMOVAL 00001611
367154
1772
1644.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
1,582.31
392196
3126/2015
100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC
323.00
BLADE SHARPENING
367219
273242
5521.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARENA ICE MAINT
323.00
392196
3/26/2015
133762 PUBLICSTUFF INC.
9,550.00
ANNUAL BILLING
367223
1415
1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
750.00
ANNUAL BILLING
367223
1415
5924.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER
750.00
ANNUAL BILLING
367223
1415
5925.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER
750.00
ANNUAL BILLING
367223
1415
5960.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
11,800.00
392197
3126/2015
136024 R.M. DREYLING CONSTRUCTION CO.
INC.
245.00
PLYWOOD WALKWAYS RENTAL
367455
1507
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
245.00
392198
3/26/2015
132063 RAPP, CRAIG
5,150.00
STRATEGIC PLANNING SERVICES
367093
3.03.15
1120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
5,150.00
392199
3/26/2015
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
341.69
SOFTENER SALT
367456
00312716
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
341.69
392200
312612015
101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS
2,080.00
TREE GRINDING
367228
908699400
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
2,080.00
392201
3/26/2015
118168 SANSIO
50.00
EMS FAXING
367229
INV -20295 -2015
1470.6160
DATA PROCESSING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
772.00
EMS SUBSCRIPTION
367230
INV -20349 -2015
1470.6160
DATA PROCESSING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
822.00
392202
3/26/2015
136997 SCHAEFFER MFG. CO.
381.60
LUBRICANTS 00005076
367094
ABH1372 -INV1
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
381.60
392203
3/26/2015
100080 SCHMOLL, RUTH
0
R55CKR2
LOGIS 101
CITY OFFDINA
3/24/20 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 25
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3120/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392203
3126/2015
100080 SCHMOLL, RUTH
Continued...
384.72
PETTY CASH
367474
031715
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
384.72
392204
3/2612015
101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH
151.52
MILEGE REIMBURSEMENT
367473
031715
1470.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
151.52
392205
3/2612015
100995 SEH
274.51
ENGINEERING SERVICES
367155
294774
5924.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER
274.51
392206
3/26/2015
130047 SELECTACCOUNT
486.00
MAR 2015 FEES
367457
008816 -3/15
1556.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
486.00
392207
3/26/2015
104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC.
185.35
NAME PLATES
367095
45332
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
185.35
392208
3/2612015
100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
96.83
PAINT 00001534
367156
0029 -2
47083.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
UTLEY PK BATHROOM RENOVATION
34.59
PAINT 00001631
367458
0546 -5
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
133.42
392209
3126/2015
120784 SIGN PRO
-
326.00
DOME BANNER
367232
8754
5553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS
1,306.75
PARKING SIGNS
367231
8783
5510.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ARENAADMINISTRATION
243.00
RECYCLING CAN SIGNS
367157
8859
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LITTER REMOVAL
1,875.75
392210
3126/2015
131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC.
10.98
HOT DOG BUNS
367233
254575
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA CONCESSIONS
10.98
392211
3/26/2015
132195 SMALL LOT MN
480.20
367336
2086
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
480.20
392212
3/26/2015
105739 SNAZA, DAVID
364.26
TRAINING EXPENSES
367487
031915
5919.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
TRAINING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
392212 3/26/2015 106739 SNAZA, DAVID Continued...
364.26
312612015
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
392213 3/26/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
891.25
367344
1262137
- 608.40
367347
1265102
1,015.50
367342
1265103
2,086.75
367341
1265104
106.13
367338
1265105
1,885.56
367337
1265106
4,246.00
367340
1265107
10,331.95
367339
1265108
1,631.71
367343
1265109
106.13
367346
1265110
7,875.50
367345
1265111
120.00-
367348
9053456
392214 3/26/2015 134700 SPOK INC.
107.40 PAGERS 367120 Y0319246C
107.40
392215 312612015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
247.75 367349 4945
5862.5513
5822.5512
5822.5513
5822.5513
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5512
5862.5512
5862.5513
5842.5513
1400.6151
5842.5514
392216
312612015
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
136030 STEWART, ROBERT J.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
203.95
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
367488
031815
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1100.6104
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
203.95
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
392217
312612016
104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK
SOLUTIONS
212.29
NETWORK DROPS
367096
18541
1554.6406
212.29
392218
3/26/2015
127938 SWENSON, ANN
49.00
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
367489
031815
1100.6104
49.00
392219
3/26/2016
101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE
467.58
ICE MELT
367159
S208751 -IN
1646.6406
467.58
0
0
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page- 26
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
•
0
0
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 27
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/2012015 — 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392219
3/26/2015
101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE
Continued...
392220
3/26/2015
106374 THERMA -STOR PRODUCTS
176.51
DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR PARTS 00001650
367459
2743294
5912.6530
REPAIR PARTS
WELL HOUSES
176.51
392221
3/26/2015
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
2,205.10
367350
882241
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
109.30
367351
882345
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,314.40
392222
3126/2015
120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA
505.00
DIGITALAD
367460
2015- 142200
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
505.00
392223
312612015
123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC.
133.00
ART COMMISSION MEETING
367121
M21163
5110.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
166.00
VET MEMORIAL MEETING MINUTES
367099
M21178
1600.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKADMIN. GENERAL
265.00
3/3/15 COUNCIL MEETING
367098
M21179
1185.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
564.00
392224
312612015
128347 TKO WINES INC.
744.00
367352
1167
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
744.00
392225
3/26/2015
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
28.47
WELDING TANKS
367461
40023488
5761.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
28.47
392226
3/2612015
136022 TRI -K SPORTS
6,105.46
RANGER 00008026
367462
BRAEMARARENA
5500.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
6,105.46
RANGER 00008026
367462
BRAEMAR ARENA
5550.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET
16, 210.92
392227
312612015
103218 TRI -STATE BOBCAT
1,800.00
CAB ENCLKIT 00005808
367234
P40907
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1,800.00
392228
312612016
103973 ULINE
74.05
CAN LINERS 00002179
367463
65895827
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
74.05
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
392232
3/26/2015
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS &
SCREEN
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392228
3/26/2015
103973 ULINE
Continued...
392229
3/26/2015
120839 UNITED FIRE FIGHTER ASSOCIATION
810.00
30.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES
367464 2015 1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
30.00
3/2612015
392230
3/26/2015
133209 USPCA REGION 18
3124/2015 11:21:15
Page - 28
Business Unit
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
120.00 PD1 CERTIFICATION FEE 367235 031815 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
120.00
392231 312612015 133209 USPCA REGION 18
200.00 K -9 TRIAL REGISTRATION 367236 FEE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
YORK SELLING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
PLANNING
ENGINEERING GENERAL
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
INSPECTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING
GENERAL (BILLING)
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL (BILLING)
GENERAL (BILLING)
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
•
200.00
392232
3/26/2015
119479 VALLEY VIEW GLASS &
SCREEN
810.00
PLEXIGLASS
00001541
367237
031815
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
810.00
392233
3/2612015
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
487.79
LIQUOR BAGS
367465
341639 -00
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
487.79
392234
3/26/2015
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
35.01
367521
9741490688
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
35.01
367521
9741490688
1140.6186
TELEPHONE
140.04
367521
9741490688
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
210.14
367521
9741490688
1554.6188
TELEPHONE
315.11
367521
9741490688
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
455.28
367521
9741490688
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
856.11
367521
9741490688
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
35.01
367521
9741490688
44012.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
210.06
367521
9741490688
5910.6168
TELEPHONE
50.49
367520
9741543447
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
788.42
367520
9741543447
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
31.10
367520
9741543447
5910.6188
TELEPHONE
50.49
367520
9741543447
5910.6188
TELEPHONE
3,214.27
392235
3/26/2015
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
37.80
WIRE GUARD
00001497
367238
9081850
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120.00
CORD PLUG ENDS
00001558
367103
9118053
1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
YORK SELLING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
PLANNING
ENGINEERING GENERAL
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
INSPECTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
P23 50TH &FR PARKING &WAYFINDING
GENERAL (BILLING)
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL (BILLING)
GENERAL (BILLING)
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
•
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 29
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
•
367358
62963
5842.5513
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
YORK SELLING
16.32
CITY OF RNA
Council Check Register by GL
133629
VON HANSONS MEATS
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
117.86
BRATS
367241
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
5520.5510
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392235
3/2612015
COST OF GOODS SOLD
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
235.13
Continued...
198.12
BULBS, ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001594
367104
9129954 1321.6530
REPAIR PARTS
101069
355.92
392236
3/26/2015
248.37
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
367466
15261755 -00
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
7.78
SAFETY GLASSES 00005139
367105
3042512 1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
7.78
SAFETY GLASSES 00005139
367105
3042512 1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC.
20.00
SAFETY GLASSES 00005139
367105
3042512 1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
LOCATE LEAKS 00001975
367467
20.00
SAFETY GLASSES 00005139
367105
3042512 5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
1,303.50
55.56
392237
3/26/2015
102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC.
WINE MERCHANTS
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 29
Business Unit
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
16.32
367358
62963
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
16.32
392238 312612015
133629
VON HANSONS MEATS
117.86
BRATS
367241
84779
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA CONCESSIONS
117.27
BRATS
367242
84783
5520.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ARENA CONCESSIONS
235.13
392239 3/26/2015
101069
VOSS LIGHTING
248.37
LIGHTBULBS
367466
15261755 -00
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
248.37
392240 3/26/2015
123616
WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC.
1,303.50
LOCATE LEAKS 00001975
367467
5873
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,303.50
392241 3/26/2015
101312
WINE MERCHANTS
290.32
367364
7021579
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,661.28
367512
7022446
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,532.24
367363
7022448
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,345.29
367513
7022449
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
9,829.13
392242 312612015
124291
WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
5,539.28
367370
1080300543
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
35.39
367365
1080300644
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,877.28
367371
1080300645
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
45.15
367372
1080300646
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
916.67
367373
1080300647
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 30
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392242
3/26/2015
124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
Continued...
688.82
367367
1080300648
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
88.09
367368
1080300649
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
7,199.37
367366
1080300650
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,021.63
367369
1080300651
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
553.45-
367374
2080077955
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17, 858.23
392243
3/26/2015
124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC
1,150.00
367379
1090374466
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
138.60
367378
1090374467
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,184.30
367375
1090375294
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
246.00
367376
1090375295
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
46.20
367377
1090375296
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,114.05
367514
1090377621
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
246.00
367515
1090377622
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
699.25
367517
1090377623
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
224.00
367516
1090377624
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,195.62
367519
1090377625
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
432.00
367518
1090377626
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
10, 676.02
392244
3/26/2015
118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC.
82.99
SPANNER HOLDERS 00003561
367243
E1310240.001
1470.6552
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
82.99
392245
3/26/2015
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
22,556.00
VALLEY VIEW RD RECON
367161
3- 01686 -590
01377.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD
22, 556.00
392246
3/26/2015
101726 XCEL ENERGY
2,803.72
51- 6227619 -3
367106
448443375
5761.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
2,803.72
392247
3/26/2015
130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER
1,492.99
VEHICLE REPAIRS
367244
13544
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,575.81
VEHICLE REPAIRS
367245
13546
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,545.86
VEHICLE REPAIRS
367246
13569
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
10, 614.66
392248
312612016
102600 ZIMMERMAN, TIM
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
392248 312612016
102600 ZIMMERMAN, TIM
102.94
PLANTS FOR CITY HALL
102.94
624,296.92
Grand Total
•
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
3/20/2015 — 3/26/2015
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
367247 031915 1551.6406
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Payment Instrument Totals
Checks 531,492.07
A/P ACH Payment 92,804.85
Total Payments .624,296.92
•
3/24/2015 11:21:15
Page - 31
Business Unit
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Summary
3/20/2015 - 3/26/2015
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
285,947.47
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
3,406.55
02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY
3,644.01
02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND
49.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
34,152.68
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
2,299.90
05100 ART CENTER FUND
3,062.51
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
234.80
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
197.44
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
26,478.45
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
21,131.13
D5550 SPORTS DOME FUND
8,431.46
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND
14,963.49
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND
2,943.30
05800 LIQUOR FUND
166,046.59
05900 UTILITY FUND
25,874.99
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
15,795.42
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
377.23
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
5,281.50
09900 PAYROLL FUND
3,979.00
Report Totals
624,296.92
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies } nd
Procedures date b (/ z 5
3/24/2015 11:21:22
Page- 1
101
R55CKR2 101
CITY OFZ'DINA
3/31/11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 1
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1145 4/2/2015
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
40.80
368068
1876848
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
40.80
1146 412/2015
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
645.74
COFFEE
367525
1169832
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
645.74
1147 4/212015
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
112.50
367662
47474400
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
96.55
368082
47474600
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
37.54
368077
47568300
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
36.55
368080
47568400
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
171.55
368081
47568600
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
258.88
368076
47568700
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
88.00
368074
47577800
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
28.12
367664
91733500
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
88.30
367663
91733600
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
106.44
368078
91763700
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
63.13
368079
91763800
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
95.55
368075
91763900
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1.183.11
1148 4/2/2016
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
13.63
OFFICE SUPPLIES
367527
WO- 104107 -1
1170.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
HUMAN RESOURCES
141.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES
367527
WO- 104107 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
136.30
PERSONNEL FOLDERS
367577
WO- 104734 -1
1170.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
HUMAN RESOURCES
9.44
OFFICE SUPPLIES
368028
WO- 105619 -1
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
73.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
368028
WO- 105619 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17.27
INDEX CARD STOCK
368026
WO- 105641 -1
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
25.90
WEAVE BINS
368027
WO- 105707 -1
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
417.50
1149 4/2/2015
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
35.05
367529
106295
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
15.51
OFFICE SUPPLIES
367528
106455
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
34.10
367530
106615
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
84.66
1150 4/2/2015
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
174.92
FILTERS 00005169
367531
940881
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 2
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015
- 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1150
4/2/2015
100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
Continued...
367.15
SPRINGS, ASSEMBLY
00005172
367532
942608
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
219.21
SLACKADJUSTERS
00005173
367533
942950
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50.48
RESISTOR
00005110
367978
943383X1
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
195.52-
CREDIT
00005172
367977
CM942608
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
616.24
1151
4/2/2016
116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
89.67
OCE MAINTENANCE
367535
988385826
1552.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
87.89
367536
988420668
1552.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
177.56
1152
4/2/2015
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
520.76
PRINTER - SOUTHDALE PRECINCT
00004305
367967
SC67667
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
299.22
WARRANTY FOR NEW TABLETS
00004322
367578
TD44339
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
14,544.22
PCR TABLETS FOR AMBULANCES
00004302
367579
TD60836
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
313.46
GHIN PC SUPPLIES
00004322
367580
TD77518
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
927.45
ENGINEERING TABLETS
00004317
367581
TF83354
5924.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER
927.45
ENGINEERING TABLETS
00004317
367581
TF83354
5925.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER
927.44
ENGINEERING TABLETS
00004317
367581
TF83354
5960.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
206.61
MOUNTING KITS FOR PCR'S
00004314
367582
TF89917
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
18, 666.61
1153
4/2/2016
100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
1,736.00
INSPECTION FEES
368164
4115
1495.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSPECTIONS
1,736.00
1154
412/2015
104020 DALCO
65.28
DISINFECTANT
00001585
367539
2860500
1646.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
65.28
DISINFECTING SPRAY
00001628
367584
2864041
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
18.74
LATEX GLOVES
00001628
367585
2864509
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
149.30
1155
412/2015
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO.
258.40
367670
795661
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,627.55
367671
795662
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
98.40
367672
795663
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,623.55
367996
795664
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
6,607.90
1156
4/2/2016
129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC.
•
•
•
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 3
Business Unit
COMMUNICATIONS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
•
368115
191981
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EIIINA
368116
192005
5842.5515
Council Check Register by GL
YORK SELLING
1,000.77
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
1159 412/2015
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
101483 MENARDS
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
1156
4/2/2015
SHEETROCK FOR PROSHOP
129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC.
367620
Continued...
5420.6577
LUMBER
625.00
EXTRANET MAINTENANCE
367548 JJ5612 1130.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
00006304
367619
625.00
5420.6577
LUMBER
CLUB HOUSE
1157
4/212015
FILTERS
101792 LUBE -TECH
367552
81346
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
39.26
GREASE 00006307
367618 606420 5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00001709
367987
39.26
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1158
4/2/2015
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 3
Business Unit
COMMUNICATIONS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,304.77
368115
191981
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
304.00-
368116
192005
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,000.77
1159 412/2015
101483 MENARDS
130.60
SHEETROCK FOR PROSHOP
00006303
367620
80336
5420.6577
LUMBER
CLUB HOUSE -
84.15
PROSHOP UPDATE MATERIALS
00006304
367619
80799
5420.6577
LUMBER
CLUB HOUSE
59.64
FILTERS
00001692
367552
81346
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
57.50
SAW BLADE, BOARDS
00001709
367987
81738
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
331.89
1160 4/2/2015
106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
495.68
TABLE COVERS
366051
330764
5720.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
495.68
1161 412/2015
119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE
INC.
339.80
TIRES
00005132
367557
210164867
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
339.80
1162 412/2015
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
294.32
LINERS, DISINFECTANT
00002178
368058
7649
5720.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
161.22
COLD CUPS
368059
7654
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
413.52
TOWELS, LINERS, GLOVES
00002184
368060
7656
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
869.06
1163 412/2015
101000 RJM PRINTING INC.
40.00
BUSINESS CARD CHANGES
367559
85376
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
147.50
BUSINESS CARDS
367561
85434
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
139.30
SENIOR CENTER ENVELOPES
367560
85489
1628.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
326.80
1164 4/2/2015
101004 SPS COMPANIES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 -
4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1164
4/212015
101004 SPS COMPANIES
Continued...
97.76
HANDLE ASSEMBLIES 00002163
368067
S3038667.002
5720.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
97.76
1165
4/2/2015
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
53.72
HANDLE 00005114
367565
66194
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
53.72
1166
4/2/2015
103277 TITAN MACHINERY
553.25
PUMP, GASKETS 00005105
367568
5591683
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
553.25
1167
4/2/2015
118190 TURFWERKS LLC
250.82
EXHAUST 00006303
367632
E186632
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
199.22
LUBRICANTS
367569
E186983
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
450.04
1168
4/2/2015
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
517.90
367697
388341 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
270.30
368139
386350 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
713.20
368008
388503 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,501.40
392249
4/212015
125324 3M
181.00
SAFETY GLASSES
367523
02188847
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
181.00
392250
412/2015
133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM
295.00
DRIVER SAFETY COURSE
367710
031415
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
295.00
392251
4/212015
133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM
275.00
DRIVER SAFETY COURSE
367711
032015
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
275.00
392252
4/2/2015
125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN
45.43
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
368014
032715
1600.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
45.43
392253
412/2015
124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST
2,836.62
JANITORIAL SERVICE
367524
7812175
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
is
•
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 4
Business Unit
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
SENIOR CITIZENS
SENIOR CITIZENS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
•
•
7,720.92
392256 4/2/2015
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF E NA
1,722.00
FIBER CONNECTIVITY
3/31/201 11:57:51
51674
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
407.50
Council Check Register by GL
368022
Page - 5
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
2,129.50
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
392257 41212015
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392253 4/212015
124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES - MIDWEST
392258 4/212015
Continued...
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
2,836.62
224.00
368073
3023707
392254 4/2/2015
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
129458 ACME TOOLS
128.00
368071
3023708
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
436.75-
INVOICE PAID TWICE
368069
367571
3207545REFUND
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
69.84
SAW BLADES, CARBIDE BITS
00001604
367572
3243653
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
3023711
310.00
GREASE GUN
00005201
367573
3248379
1553.6584
LUBRICANTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
25.99
MASONRY BLADE
00001703
367574
3263848
5913.6556
TOOLS
DISTRIBUTION
75.00
82.49
CARBURETOR ASSEMBLY
00005143
367575
3270092
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
367576
51.57
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
392255 4/2/2015
136922 ACUSHNET COMPANY
108.00
GOLF BALLS
368015
900246525
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
108.00
GOLF BALLS
368016
900246527
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
108.00
GOLF BALLS
368017
900246706
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,335.20
GOLF BAGS
368018
900276793
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,393.18
CAPS
368019
900289080
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
4,492.90
GOLF BALLS
368021
900298770
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
175.64
HATS
368020
900298771
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
7,720.92
392256 4/2/2015
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
1,722.00
FIBER CONNECTIVITY
368023
51674
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
407.50
FIBER CONNECTIVITY
368022
51710
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
2,129.50
392257 41212015
102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE
695.05
CONCESSION PRODUCT
368024
503270517
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
695.05
392258 4/212015
132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
224.00
368073
3023707
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
128.00
368071
3023708
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
435.30
368069
3023709
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
988.00
368072
3023710
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
886.75
368070
3023711
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
2,662.05
392259 4/2/2015
126996 BCA - CJTE
75.00
RECERTIFICATION
367576
MULTIPLE
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
75.00
RECERTIFICATION
367576
MULTIPLE
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
392259 4/2/2015
Council Check Register by GL
126996 BCA - CJTE
Council
75.00
RECERTIFICATION
240.00
MENTORING /COACHING CLASS
PO # Doc No
240.00
MENTORING /COACHING CLASS
D2813260
240.00
MENTORING /COACHING CLASS
367576
945.00
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
392260 4/2/2015
MULTIPLE 1400.6104
126996 BCA - CJTE
367576
75.00
DMT RECERTIFICATION
367576
75.00
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
392261 412/2015
BERNICK'S
118966 BCBS OF MN
116.05
BEVERLY SCHLACHTER
1,160.31
GEORGE SWANSON
1,160.31
GEORGE SWANSON
368157 6507 2340.6104
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
392262
CITY OF EDINA
131191
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
216.00
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
D2813260
5730.5510
Continued...
367576
MULTIPLE 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
367576
MULTIPLE 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
367576
MULTIPLE 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
367576
MULTIPLE 1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
368157 6507 2340.6104
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
367976 OVERPAYMENT 1470.4329
REFUND
392262
41212015
131191
BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
216.00
PIZZA
368025
D2813260
5730.5510
216.00
392263
4/2/2015
125139
BERNICK'S
233.50
367665
206781
5842.5514
233.50
392264
4/212015
126847
BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
86.95
COFFEE
367526
T16812
1552.6406
86.95
392265
4/212015
124534
BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC
45,595.25
PARTIAL
PAYMENT NO. 1
368165
15 -2 BR -10
1346.6180
45, 595.25
392266
4/2/2015
119361
BOURGET IMPORTS
617.00
367666
125565
5842.5513
432.74
368083
125566
5822.5513
610.00
368084
125579
5862.5513
1,659.74
•
•
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
AMBULANCE FEES
AMBULANCE FEES
AMBULANCE FEES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 6
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
PUBLIC HEALTH
DWI FORFEITURE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
0
3/31/201511:57:51
Page- 7
Business Unit
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
CITY HALL GENERAL
490.02 MERCHANDISE
0
925811798
5440.5511
4
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
925811823
5440.5511
CITY OF IN
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
575.40
368030
925811869
5440.5511
Council Check Register by GL
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,050.77
368034
925833058
5440.5511
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
75.00
368033
925833134
5440.5511
4/2/2015 — 412/2015
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
392266
4/2/2015
119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
Continued...
392267
4/2/2015
136072 BREAKING FREE
564.00
367667
20D.00
HRRC EVENT
367712 APR 9TH 1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
200.00
392268
4/2/2015
103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO.
1,973.52
WINDOW REPLACEMENT
367534 527934S 1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,973.52
392269
4/2/2015
102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
3/31/201511:57:51
Page- 7
Business Unit
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
CITY HALL GENERAL
490.02 MERCHANDISE
368029
925811798
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,920.30
368031
925811823
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
575.40
368030
925811869
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,050.77
368034
925833058
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
75.00
368033
925833134
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
144.00
368032
925833160
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
5,255.49
392270 4/2/2015 120541 CANNON RIVER WINERY
564.00
367667
7647
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
392271 4/2/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
R RrI 7n
392272 4/2/2015
63.27
63.27
392273 412/2015
99.82
2,414.22
8,358.07
5,512.92
195.35
3,51833
20,098.71
111089 CARLSON, ERIC
UNIFORM PURCHASE
112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
1 008 990 0 -4
5546504 -1
5563827 -4
5591458 -4
5596524 -8
8034001 -1
367669 539661 5842.5514
367668 544707 5822.5514
368035 032615 1400.6203
368160
10089900 -3/15
1646.6186
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
368158
5546504 -3/15
1470.6186
CITY HALL GENERAL
367538
5563827 -3/15
5210.6186
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
368159
5591458 -3/15
1551.6186
367966
5596524 -3/15
5430.6186
367537
8034001 -3/15
1552.6186
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
HEAT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
HEAT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
HEAT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
HEAT
CITY HALL GENERAL
HEAT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
HEAT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
392274 4/2/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued...
57.52 952 920 -1586 368162 1586 -3/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE
69.89 952 922 -2444 368161 2444 -3/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 8
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
127.41
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
392275
4/2/2015
TOOLS
122317 CITY OF EDINA -COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
280.28
CITY FLAGS
368163
COM -0433
5511.6406
280.28
392276
412/2015
100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS
353.56
367995
0128521815
5842.5515
353.56
392277
412/2015
101704 COOK, BARBARA
150.30
PROGRAM COORDINATOR
367583
15 -1684
1629.6103
150.30
392278
4/2/2015
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
75.09
TERMINAL CRIMP KIT 00005202
367540
986158
1553.6556
527.78
JAW PULLER 00005207
367543
987200
1553.6556
108.35
FLARING KIT 00005208
367542
987211
1553.6556
65.70
DRILL EXTRACTOR 00005208
367544
987218
1553.6556
29.40
JAW
367541
987283
1553.6556
306.01-
CREDIT
367979
988277
1553.6556
500.31
392279
412/2015
121161 DEX MEDIA
21.40
PHONE LISTING
367586
031615
5821.6188
21.40
PHONE LISTING
367586
031615
5841.6188
21.40
PHONE LISTING
367586
031615
5861.6188
64.20
392280
4/2/2015
122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
INC.
1,035.56
LIGHTHEADS /MOUNTS
367588
AW030515 -12
421400.6710
734.66
TOMAR STROBE FOR MOTORCYCLE
367587
AW030615 -3
421400.6710
777.90
SQUAD 243 UPGRADES
367589
RS4215
421400.6710
2,548.12
392281
412/2015
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
182.44-
CREDIT
367606
1- 4642387
1553.6530
72.60-
CREDIT
367605
14642388
1553.6530
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 8
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
TELEPHONE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
0
•A
R55CKR2
Lo•01
CITY OF
3/31/20:57:51
Council Check Register by
GL
Page- 9
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392281
4/2/2015
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
Continued...
230.06-
CREDIT
367607
1- 4644589
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
298.02
BATTERIES
367590
1- 4647993
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
149.01
BATTERY
367591
1- 4648165
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
12.14
PARTS
367594
1- 4649924
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
294.36-
CREDIT
367608
1- 4650802
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
23.71
OIL SEAL
367595
1- 4654716
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.63
BATTERY
367601
1- 4656812
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.63
BATTERY
367600
1- 4656813
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
149.15
BATTERIES
367602
1- Z04029
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
185.59-
CREDIT
367604
69- 169581
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
55.42-
CREDIT
367603
69- 169623
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
149.86
ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKE KIT
367592
69- 170676
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4.89
FUEL CAP
367593
69- 170905
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
126.88-
CREDIT
367609
69- 171216
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
82.74
OIL SEAL, PAD KIT
367596
69- 171533
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
197.63
REMAN ALTER CHECK
367599
69- 171838
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
35.44
TRANSMISSION CHECK
367598
69- 171856
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
22.44
SWITCH ASSEMBLY
367597
69- 171919
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
40.94
392282
4/2/2015
102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER
1,179.00
BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY
368206
INSTRUCTION
5401.4602
LESSONS
GOLF REVENUES
1,179.00
392283
4/2/2015
126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
528.15
METER COUPLINGS 00001652
367545
0128176
5917.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
METER REPAIR
528.15
392284
4/212015
120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC.
1,989.77
SOT RESCUE EQUIPMENT 00003536
367980
8694
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,989.77
392285
4/212015
119211 FIRSTLAB
299.70
DRUG SCREENING
368036
FL00115120
1556.6175
PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
299.70
392286
412/2016
134850 FISHER, DAVID
80.80
TRAVEL EXPENSES
368166
032715
1500.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CONTINGENCIES
80.80
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 10
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 — 4/2/2015
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392287 412/2015
100764 G & K SERVICES
Continued...
15.00
SHOP RAGS
367610
1006780152
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
15.00
SHOP RAGS
367611
1006802936
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
30.00
392288 4/212015
100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION
1,085.00
CHAMPIONSHIP JACKETS
368167
88662
1621.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
1.085.00
392289 4/2/2015
125935 GOLF SCORECARDS INC.
1,418.00
SCORECARDS
368037
39765
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
1,418.00
392290 4/2/2015
132603 GOLFNOW G1 LLC
2,500.00
RESERVATION SOFTWARE LEASE
368168
5100085568
5410.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,500.00
392291 4/2/2015
100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE
550.00
MOTORCYCLE GRAPHICS
367612
99610
421400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE EQUIPMENT
40.00
NEW STYLE SHIELD STICKER
367613
99616
1400.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
590.00
392292 4/212015
101103 GRAINGER
176.80
UTILITY CONTAINERS 00006364
367614
9684450688
5210.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
120.45-
RETURN 00002180
368039
9688895219
5720.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
152.22
HALOGEN LAMPS
368038
9689190669
5720.6406
GENERALSUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
275.58
EAR PLUGS, LUBRICANT 00001691
367546
9693721111
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
484.15
392293 4/212015
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
92.25
368085
179463
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
92.25
392294 4/2/2015
102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
1,028.68
MERCHANDISE
366041
53760
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
77.07
LOGO TOOL
368040
53768
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,105.75
392295 4/2/2015
100785 GREUPNER, JOE
4,095.00
BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY
368205
INSTRUCTION
5401.4602
LESSONS
GOLF REVENUES
4,095.00
0
•
•
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
LESSONS
i
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 11
Business Unit
GOLF REVENUES
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS
SENIOR SOFTBALL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
SENIOR CITIZENS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
50TH STREET GENERAL
CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
0
R55CKR2 L001
CITY OF EiJINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
392295
4/212015
100785 GREUPNER, JOE
392296
4/2/2015
100008 GRUBE, MIKE
936.00
BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY
368207
INSTRUCTION
5401.4602
936.00
392297
4/2/2015
106431 HALL, MARY
150.00
EP PERFORMANCE 4/09/15
367706
032515
5710.6136
150.00
392298
4/2/2015
102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC
170.64
CABINET SWITCH 00001694
367547
139817 -1
1321.6530
170.64
392299
4/2/2015
120227 HARTSHORN, BOB
1,976.48
SOFTBALL CAPS
368169
032615
1628.4392.03
1,978.48
392300
4/2/2015
106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
1,185.00
TEMPO EMT REFRESHERS
368042
38758
1400.6104
1,185.00
392301
412/2015
100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
145.38
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
174.90
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
409.48
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
765.90
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
1503.6915
777.47
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
895.07
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
1503.6915
2,206.10
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
1503.6915
2,442.08
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
3,365.56
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
3,447.88
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
3,802.17
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
1503.6915
14,804.05
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
5510.6103
61.54
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
5860.6103
2,687.70
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
5820.6103
12,136.82
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
9232.6710
44.67
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1 ST HALF
9235.6710
745.95
TAXES
368170
2015 - 1ST HALF
9235.6710
48,912.72
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
LESSONS
i
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 11
Business Unit
GOLF REVENUES
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS
SENIOR SOFTBALL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
SENIOR CITIZENS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
50TH STREET GENERAL
CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 12
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392301
4/2/2015
100801
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
Continued...
392302
412/2015
105436
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
2,466.05
RADIO FLEET FEES
368210
1000058093
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,466.05
392303
4/212015
104375
HOHENSTEINS INC.
1,561.50
367997
753506
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,033.00
367673
753634
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
150.00
367674
753667
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
290.50
367675
753795
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
906.00
368156
753797
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,941.00
392304
4/212015
131544
INDEED BREWING COMPANY
390.00
367676
27495
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
530.00
367998
27535
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
920.00
392305
4/212015
100829
JERRY'S HARDWARE
3.19
367615
2/15- FACILITIES
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
219.90
367617
2/15 -PARKS
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3.98
367616
2/15- UTILITIES
5915.6530
REPAIR PARTS
WATER TREATMENT
19.17
367616
2 /15- UTILITIES
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
32.18
367616
2 /15- UTILITIES
5912.6530
REPAIR PARTS
WELL HOUSES
40.18
367616
2/15- UTILITIES
5920.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEWER CLEANING
343.36
367616
2115- UTILITIES
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
WELL HOUSES
4.44
367616
2/15- UTILITIES
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
83.12
367616
2115- UTILITIES
5932.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
749.52
392306
4/2/2015
100830
JERRY'S PRINTING
185.00
POOL & TRACK PASSES
368043
67740
5710.6575
PRINTING
EDIN BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
185.00
392307
4/2/2015
100741
JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
50.00-
368000
2334854
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
792.95
368088
2334920
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
60.30
368087
2334921
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
6,275.95
367999
2334922
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
108.00
368090
2334927
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
•
•
.
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
392307 4/2/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
4,076.74
97.55
11,361.49
392308 4/2/2015 136082 JOFIT LLC
1,385.77 APPAREL
1,385.77
CITY OF ETSINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Doc No Inv No Account No
368086 2334928 5842.5514
368089 2334930 5842.5515
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
i
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 13
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
368171 59925 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
392309 412/2015
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
48.00
367679
5118345
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
140.00
367678
5118346
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
37.16
367677
5119354
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
426.73
368098
5123192
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
65.16
368100
5123193
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,484.48
368104
5123194
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,099.40
368111
5123195
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,489.02
368001
5123196
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,099.40
368096
5123197
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,387.02
368099
5123198
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
682.24
368101
5123199
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
474.63
368097
5123200
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
299.48
368102
5123201
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,025.10
368105
5123203
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
424.13
368107
5123204
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,067.20
368108
5123206
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,691.56
368106
5123208
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
459.15
368109
5123210
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
98.23
368110
5123211
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,586.21
368091
5123212
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,302.85
368093
5123213
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,066.36
368092
5123216
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
323.09
368094
5123218
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,530.34
368095
5123219
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
75.16
368103
5124566
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2.76-
367686
518280
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
12.67-
367685
518281
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
7.50-
367684
518282
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
10.00-
367680
518284
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
8.33-
367681
518285
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
10.00-
367683
518286
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 14
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 -
4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392309
41212015
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
Continued...
10.75-
367682
518287
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1.89-
368114
519087
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
22.22-
368113
519088
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
10.67-
368112
519090
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
25,285.31
392310
4/2/2015
135813 KAMPEN, CAITLIN
853.07
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
367968
032415
1622.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
SKATING & HOCKEY
853.07
392311
4/2/2016
135940 KAUFMAN, MICHELLE
25.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
367969
032415
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
25.00
392312
4/2/2015
111018 KEEPRS INC.
17.98
UNIFORMS 00003556
367981
268163 -03
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
338.72
00003556
367982
268435 -03
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
338.72
00003556
367983
268647 -04
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
695.42
392313
412/2015
113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC.
181.54
BAN DSAW LOCKS 00001570
367549
S1017808
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
181.54
392314
4/2/2015
115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE
688.50
BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY
368208
INSTRUCTION
5401.4602
LESSONS
GOLF REVENUES
688.50
392315
4/212015
100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS
65.55
UNIFORM
367984
SIN2616859
1556.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
65.55
392316
4/212015
133050 LARSON, CINDY
68.60
FIELD TRIP EXPENSES
368172
032715
1500.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CONTINGENCIES
68.60
392317
4/2/2015
100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
126.99
HAND CLEANER
367550
9303152607
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
126.99
•
•
•
0
CITY OF E'131NA
R55CKR2
L001
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 15
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 — 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392318
412/2015
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
Continued...
10,574.29
CLAIM CONCLUSION
368044
C0036356
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
10, 574.29
392319
41212015
102965 LEONE, RON
141.00
ASE TESTING
367985
RECERTIFICATION
1553.6027
TRAINING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
141.00
392320
4/2/2015
134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY
17,840.16
FUEL 00005204
367551
332984
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17,840.16
392321
412/2015
122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA
320.00
HOSTING FEES
368045
205
1130.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
320.00
392322
41212015
136080 MEARS, SARAH
153.15
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
368173
7017 MCCAULEY
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
TR
153.15
392323
4/2/2015
106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
2,069.25
OLD LOG THEATER TRIP
367970
032415
1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
2,069.25
392324
4/212015
106326 MEDRANO, CHRIS
585.00
2015 WINTER GOLF INSTRUCTION
367986
JAN /FEB
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
585.00
392325
41212015
103720 MEDTECH
1,273.31
WRISTBANDS
368046
IN000450369
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
1,273.31
392326
4/212015
101987 MENARDS
59.81
BATTERIES, TAPE 00002186
368047
64794
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
59.81
392327
4/2/2015
100886 METRO SALES INC
7,924.94
CITYWIDE MFP USAGE
368048
015007 -3/15
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
2,108.52
ADMIN MFP USAGE
367971
INV217779
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
10, 033.46
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
392327 412/2015 100885 METRO SALES INC Continued...
392328 412/2015 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
85.50 OFFICIATING FEES 367621 4749 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
85.50
392329 4/2/2015 104650 MICRO CENTER
119.99 SPARE SSD 367622 5467146 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
34.99 USB HUB 00004330 367623 5493766 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
154.98
392330 4/2/2016 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
110.00 ELECTRICAL LICENSE 367624 632432 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
110.00
392331 4/2/2015 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION
360.00 2015 DUES 368049 5099127 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
360.00
392332 41212015 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC
10.00 PICKLEBALL ROUNDTABLE 367626 8499 1621.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES
10.00
392333 4/212015 120604 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC.
115.00
INTERIOR PACKAGE
367553 45762 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
135.00
COMPLETE CLEAN
367554 45767 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
125.00
INTERIOR PACKAGE
367555 45789 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
375.00
392334 4/212015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
49.00 HRRC POSTERS 367989 17287 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS
49.00
392335 4/2/2015 136078 MMWR
99.00 WEEKLY REPORT SUBSCRIPTION 368174 JEFF BROWN 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
99.00
392336 4/2/2015 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
40.00 BOILER LICENSE 367556 ABRO1142621 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10.00 LICENSE FEE 367988 ABRO1144621 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
50.00
• 0
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 16
Business Unit
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
PUBLIC HEALTH
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
WATER TREATMENT
•
0
112,918.50
4
1
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
412/2015
101796 MPCA
CITY OF E NA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
258.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE
Council Check Register by GL
2200100452
Page- 17
RUBBISH REMOVAL
258.00
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
392340
4/2/2015
100916 MUZAK LLC
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392336
4/2/2015
102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
MUSIC SERVICES
Continued...
51485841
392337
412/2015
117015 MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES INC.
277.77
MUSIC SERVICES
367562
51485841
5860.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
602.30
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
368175
5520 MIRROR 5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
392341
4/2/2015
LAKES DR
304.47
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
368176
6705 GLEASON RD 5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
906.77
124.48
MAR MILEAGE
368177
033115
392338
4/212015
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
147.89
JAN MILEAGE
368177
033115
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
112,918.50
PORTABLE RADIOS 00003136
368050
41206948 421400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
112,918.50
392339
412/2015
101796 MPCA
258.00
HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE
367625
2200100452
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
258.00
392340
4/2/2015
100916 MUZAK LLC
277.77
MUSIC SERVICES
367562
51485841
5820.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
277.77
MUSIC SERVICES
367562
51485841
5840.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
277.77
MUSIC SERVICES
367562
51485841
5860.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
833.31
392341
4/2/2015
127647 NEAL, SCOTT H.
116.26
FEB MILEAGE
368177
033115
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
124.48
MAR MILEAGE
368177
033115
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
147.89
JAN MILEAGE
368177
033115
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
151.48
DEC MILEAGE
368177
033115
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
540.11
392342
4/2/2015
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
145.50
368002
98683
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
169.50
368117
98684
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
486.00
367687
98685
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
801.00
392343
4/212015
101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL
19.88
TRAINING EXPENSES
368178
032715
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
32.00
TRAINING EXPENSES
368178
032715
1400.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
51.88
392344
4/2/2015
104350 NIKE USA INC.
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
50TH STREET GENERAL
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register
by GL
Page- 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 --
4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392344
412/2015
104350 NIKE USA INC.
Continued...
39.40
MERCHANDISE
368052
969492620
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
39.40
392345
412/2015
132620 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED
DISTRICT
50,223.94
CENT LAKES PROJECT
367990
032515
5960.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
50,223.94
392346
4/2/2015
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
257.94
DEPOSIT BAGS
368053
760575082001
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
22.03
BATTERIES, PAPERCLIPS
368054
760575096001
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
279.97
392347
412/2015
100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
37.31-
368119
8491699 -CM
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
382.12
367688
8491877 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
567.27
368118
8491883 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
82.25
367689
8491887 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
994.33
392348
4/2/2015
136073 PEARSON, NORMA M.
1,464.10
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND
367972
032415
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,464.10
392349
412/2015
100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
231.90
368055
47741249
5730.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
231.90
392350
4/2/2015
119935 PET CROSSING
844.47
K9 EXAM - BLADE
368209
135264
4607.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
844.47
392351
412/2015
134802 PETER MUSTY LLC
4,500.00
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE SAP
368179
262
9235.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
4,500.00
392352
4/2/2015
100950 PETTY CASH
3.00
368056
032715
1190.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ASSESSING
4.07
366056
032715
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
7.00
368056
032715
1140.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PLANNING
8.00
368056
032715
1130.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
COMMUNICATIONS
•
0
0
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF E INA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
392352 4/2/2015 100950 PETTY CASH
38.58
368130
12.10
368056
032715
1490.6107
18.99
368056
032715
1100.6106
19.17
368056
032715
1130.6106
20.00
368056
032715
1180.6103
20.00
368056
032715
1190.6104
20.00
368056
032715
1185.6406
21.41
368056
032715
1140.6106
25.59
368056
032715
1552.6406
28.75
368056
032715
1495.6107
29.76
368056
032715
1140.6406
39.54
368056
032715
1160.6107
44.00
368056
032715
1120.6107
64.15
368056
032715
1120.6104
120.00
368056
032715
1495.6104
141.37
368056
032715
1140.6107
19.14
368056
032715
01410.1705.31
16.04
368056
032715
5842.6406
65.60
368056
032715
5840.6107
105.60
368056
032715
5860.6107
12.19
368056
032715
5902.6406
21.84
368056
032715
5902.6107
887.31
Continued...
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
MEETING EXPENSE
MEETING EXPENSE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
GENERALSUPPLIES
MEETING EXPENSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
3/31/201:57 51
Page- 19
PUBLIC HEALTH
CITY COUNCIL
COMMUNICATIONS
ELECTION
ASSESSING
LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
PLANNING
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
INSPECTIONS
PLANNING
FINANCE
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION
INSPECTIONS
PLANNING
CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON
YORK SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
392353 4/2/2016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
38.58
368130
2761132
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
38.78
368129
2761947
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,112.92
368128
2762644
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
278.32
368126
2762645
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
90.32
368127
2762646
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
41.16
368122
2762647
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
704.80
368125
2762648
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,136.95
368123
2762650
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
114.32
368121
2762651
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
370.75
368120
2762652
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
250.96
368124
2762653
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,397.98
368004
2762654
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
497.28
368131
2762655
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,280.04
368003
2762656
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
8,353.16
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 20
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
412/2015 —
4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392354
4/2/2015
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
Continued...
1,666.93
AQUATIC CENTER MAILING
368057
032615
5310.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
POOL ADMINISTRATION
1,666.93
392355
4/212015
100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC.
24.50
SEALS
00006289
367627
CD1873365
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
24.50
392356
412/2015
120783 R E CARLSON INC.
300.82
HVAC PARTS
00001582
367558
0039032
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
300.82
392357
412/2015
104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY
4,050.00
ADA POOL STAIRS
00002162
368061
280679
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
4,050.00
392358
41212015
135078 RMGA INC.
15,000.00
MASTER PLAN FINAL PAYMENT
368062
1405 -03
2410.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND
15,000.00
392359
4/2/2015
101682 S & S WORLDWIDE INC.
90.98
B -BALLS
00002181
368063
8507717
5720.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
90.98
392360
4/2/2015
134173 SAFE -FAST INC.
15.20
SAFETY GLASSES
00005136
367563
INV150575
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
20.00
SAFETY GLASSES
00005136
367563
INV150575
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
70.00
SAFETY GLASSES
00005136
367563
INV150575
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
100.00
SAFETY GLASSES
00005136
367563
INV150575
5913,6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
205.20
392361
412/2015
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
459.13
PARTS WASHER SERVICE
367628
66193792
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
459.13
392362
4/2/2015
136074 SANDERS, STEVE
200.00
EP PERFORMANCE 4/16/15
367708
032515
5710.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
200.00
392363
4/2/2015
100996 SEH
659.58
ANTENNA PROJECTS
367564
295252
1001.4722
RENTAL OF PROPERTY
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
392363 4/212015 100995 SEH
659.58
0
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
392364 412/2015 136076 SHANNON INSTITUTE/WILDER FOUNDATION
4,000.00 PARTICIPATION FEE 367993 KAREN KURT
4,000.00
392365 412/2015
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
120784 SIGN PRO
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5842.5513
185.00
YORK SELLING
DASHERBOARD
367629
8643
5842.5515
87.32
YORK SELLING
MONTHLY SPECIALS PRINTING
367630
8858
5862.5512
87.34
VERNON SELLING
MONTHLY SPECIALS PRINTING
367630
8858
5862.5513
87.34
VERNON SELLING
MONTHLY SPECIALS PRINTING
367630
8858
5842.5513
60.00
YORK SELLING
HANGING SIGNS
367991
6903
5400.1705
60.00
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
HANGING SIGNS
367991
8903
5400.1705
60.00
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
HANGING SIGNS
367991
8903
627.00
392366 412/2015
127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
113.20
368133
1267405
1,761.38
368134
1267406
120.75
367693
1267407
3,507.35
367691
1267408
124.50
367692
1267409
1,499.25
367694
1267410
1,306.76
367690
1267411
2,110.38
368005
1267412
7,861.50
368006
1267413
1,511.25
368132
1268720
120.00-
367695
9053893
19, 796.32
392367 412/2015
103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND
150.00
EP PERFORMANCE 4/19/15
367709
032515
150.00
392368 4/2/2015
130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS
INC.
7,308.95
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE REMODEL
368064
30496
1,470.35
368065
30550
5,250.00
368066
30551
14,029.30
1120.6104
5510.6103
5862.6575
5822.6575
5842.6575
5822.6575
5842.6575
5862.6575
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
0
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 21
Business Unit
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
ARENAADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5710.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
5400.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
5400.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
5400.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
GOLF BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
392369 4/2/2015 136081 SRCM LLC
2,500.00 ED136973 ESCROW REFUND
2,500.00
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
368180 4214 SCOTT TERR 1495.4109
392370 4/2/2015 103658 ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND
75.00 EP PERFORMANCE 4/12/15 367707 032515 5710.6136
75.00
392371 412/2015 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON
1,222.03 INSTALL MOTORCYCLE EQUIPMENT 367631 EDINA POLICE 421400.6710
1,222.03
392372 4/2/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
368135 4979
121.75
392373 4/2/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
514.54 TIRES 00005106 367566 10131488
619.96 TIRES 00005174 367567 10131583
1,134.50
392374 4/2/2015 104932 TAYLOR MADE
255.00 -
593.41-
331.20-
1, 537.25-
1,096.30 -
1,626.30-
490.10-
292.86-
1,255.38
1,592.50 MERCHANDISE
27.56
432.18
308.70
144.06
165.62
25.68
27.55
144.06
1,933.00
•
368193 30241178
368195 30252340
368194 30252656
368196 30283753
368199 30284805
368197 30285340
368198 30293412
368200 30301152
368183 30501070
368181 30511714
368182 30518915
368184 30529835
368185 30533096
368186 30537005
368187 30547469
368188 30556276
368189 30560995
368190 30561091
368192 30570772
5862.5514
1553.6583
1553.6583
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
5440.5511
01440,5511
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page- 22
Business Unit
INSPECTIONS
PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
TIRES & TUBES
TIRES & TUBES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PRO SHOP RETAKES
•
•
0
R55CKR2
LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Council Check Register by
GL
Page- 23
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 — 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392374
4/2/2015
104932 TAYLOR MADE
Continued...
373.63
368191
30571069
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
207.50
392375
412/2015
136079 THORNBY, DALE
132.95
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
368201
6308 HILLSIDE
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
RD
132.95
392376
4/2/2015
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
141.00
368007
883695
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,090.30
368136
883696
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
2,231.30
392377
41212015
128347 TKO WINES INC.
151.20
368138
1199
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
144.00
368137
1218
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
295.20
392378
41212015
136077 TRUEBLOOD, MICHAEL
140.80
UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND
368202
5725 EWING AVE
5900.2015
CUSTOMER REFUND
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
140.80
392379
412/2016
114236 USA BLUE BOOK
2,245.93
WATER METER SUPPLIES 00001643
367992
586372
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
2,245.93
392380
41212015
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
45.70
SEAT BRACKETS 00006305
367633
317150009
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
45.70
392381
4/212015
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
39.60
FUSES FOR COMPRESSOR 00001622
367973
9151410
5841.6530
REPAIR PARTS
YORK OCCUPANCY
77.52
PHOTO CELLS 00001635
367570
9158549
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
117.12
392382
4/2/2016
102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC.
171.50
367696
62974
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
171.50
392383
4/212015
100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
1,628.04
367702
1080303254
CITY OF EDINA
5862.5512
3/31/2015 11:57:51
VERNON SELLING
2,333.43
368011
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 24
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
Council
Check Register
by Invoice & Summary
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
585.31
4/2/2015 -
4/2/2015
5822.5512
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392383 4/212015
50TH ST SELLING
100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C.
Continued...
2,875.00
2ND QTR RETAINER
367974
215007
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
2,875.00
392384 412/2015
105486 W.S. DARLEY & CO.
18,715.96
THERMAL IMAGERS 00003541
368203
17173561
421470.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
FIRE EQUIPMENT
18,715.96
392385 41212015
103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN
60.05
367634
8883 -2808
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
96.06
367634
8883 -2808
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
162.57
367634
8883 -2808
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
199.88
367634
8883 -2808
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
378.94
367634
8883 -2808
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
474.24
367634
8883 -2808
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
474.25
367634
8883 -2808
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
62.75
367634
8883 -2808
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
74.39
367634
8883 -2808
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
301.06
367634
8883 -2808
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
391.38
367634
8883 -2808
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
910.56
367634
8883 -2808
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1,096.26
367634
8883 -2808
5720.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
82.14
367634
8883 -2808
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
130.95
367634
8883 -2808
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
4,895.48
392386 4/2/2015
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
157.00-
368143
702072
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
384.00-
368144
702098
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
226.32
368141
7023260
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
937.44
368142
7023262
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,061.12
368009
7023263
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
189.32
368140
7023493
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,873.20
392387 412/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
1,628.04
367702
1080303254
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,333.43
368011
1080303255
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
73.15
368010
1080303256
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
585.31
368146
1080303258
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
394.60
368147
1080303259
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
•
•
0
11
R55CKR2
L001
CITY OF EDINA
3/31/20 :57:51
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 25
Council
Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
392387
4/2/2015
124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
Continued...
16.79
368145
1080303260
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,814.02
367698
1080303262
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
133.15
367700
1080303263
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,145.89
367699
1080303274
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
45.15
367701
1080303275
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
161.41-
367703
2080078253
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
9,008.12
392388
412/2015
124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC
1,893.00
368013
1090377953
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,855.95
367704
1090378685
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
147.60
367705
1090378686
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
2,192.50
368153
1090380916
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
138.60
368152
1090380917
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,335.39
368154
1090380918
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
192.00
368151
1090380919
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
23.10
368150
1090380920
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
172.20
368148
1090381032
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
96.00
368149
1090381033
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
8,046.34
392389
4/2/2015
118340 WPS / TRICARE
87.44
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
367975
MARGARET
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
KUZ N IAR
87.44
392390
4/2/2015
101726 XCEL ENERGY
50.47
51- 5276505 -8
367635
449335962
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
136.22
51- 0010025256 -3
367636
449406908
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
14.49
51- 0010613106 -9
367637
449420091
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
7,047.34
51- 6644819 -9
368204
450405575
5720.6185
LIGHT & POWER
EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
7,248.52
392391
412/2015
120099 Z WINES USA LLC
362.00
368155
13798
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
362.00
392392
4/2/2015
101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
132.90
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
367994
54161293
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
132.90
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO #
392392 4/212015 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
616,671.04 Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
4/2/2015 -- 4/2/2015
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
Continued...
Payment Instrument Totals
Checks 579,661.19
A/PACH Payment 37,009.85
Total Payments 616,671.04
3/31/2015 11:57:51
Page - 26
Business Unit
0 0 0
C;
0
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKS2 LO GIS100
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
Council Check Summary
02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND
4/2/2015 - 4/2/2015
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
180,118.59
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
75.00
02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND
15,000.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
863.61
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
135,954.61
05100 ART CENTER FUND
62.75
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
8,609.26
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
1,666.93
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
44,023.23
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
16,179.89
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND
17,014.92
05800 LIQUOR FUND
121,864.33
05900 UTILITY FUND
6,571.54
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
51,238.94
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
12,136.82
09235 VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
5,290.62
Report Totals 616,671.04
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedures date
�C L -S
Finance.Director /7 Z),
3/311201 10 57:58
Page - 1
Jr
•
•
• • 0
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name-
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *6043
LISA SCHAEFER
2015/01/12
$299.00
Training
NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA
760 - 433 -1686
CA
1170.6104
* *6043
LISA SCHAEFER
2015/01/12
$200.00
MPELRA Dues
NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA
760 - 433 -1686
CA
1170.6105
* *6043
LISA SCHAEFER
2015/01/12
$299.00
Training
NATL PUBLIC EMPLOYER LA
760 - 433 -1686
CA
1170.6104
* *6043
LISA SCHAEFER
2015/01/24
$100.00
Employment Ad
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1556.6121
* *0127
KAREN KURT
2014/12/29
$106.00
Office 365 License
PAYPAL *EDINA STORE
402 - 935 -7733
MN
1554.6160
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/07
$2,530.00
Conference Registration
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
WASHINGTON
DC
1100.6106
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/07
$284.20
Air Fare - Swenson
DELTA AIR 0067532631567
CHICAGO
IL
1120.6104
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/07
$284.20
Air Fare - Neal
DELTA AIR 0067532618570
CHICAGO
IL
1120.6104
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/10
$105.82
Food
SALUT BAR AMERICAIN
EDINA
MN
1120.6106
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/09
$41.03
Food
EDINA GRILL
EDINA
MN
1120.6106
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/11
$66.33
Office Supplies
OFFICE MAX
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1120.6406
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/15
$376.20
Air Fare - Staunton
DELTA AIR 0067533318581
CHICAGO
IL
1120.6104
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/20
$515.20
Air Fare- Stewart
DELTA AIR 0067533726810
CHICAGO
IL
1120.6104
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/21
$380.20
Air Fare - Brindle
DELTA AIR 0067533832784
CHICAGO
IL
1120.6104
* *0168
SCOTT NEAL
2015/01/23
$80.35
Food
CIAO BELLA
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1120.6106
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2014/12/27
$48.00
Monthly service fee
VOLGISTICS INC
616- 456 -5388
MI
1120.6105
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/06
$238.65
Food
D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA
EDINA
MN
1100.6106
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/08
$33.19
Office Supplies
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1100.6406
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/14
$41.65
Notary Stamp
NOTARY ROTARY, INC
515 - 309 -1351
IA
1180.6406
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/20
$194.12
Food
D'AMICO & SONS /EDINA
EDINA
MN
1100.6106
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/21
$130.08
Food
LEEANN CHIN #005 CATERING
612 - 6730789
MN
1120.6106
* *2129
HEATHER BRANIGIN
2015/01/23
$128.13
Food
LEEANN CHIN #005 CATERING
612 - 6730789
MN
1120.6106
* *9159
CARY TEAGUE
2014/12/30
$37.11
Food
EDEN AVENUE GRILL
EDINA
MN
1140.6103
* *7370
ERIC ROGGEMAN
2015/01/02
$18.25
Transaction fee
PAYFLOW /PAYPAL
888- 883 -9770
TX
1160.6155
* *7370
ERIC ROGGEMAN
2015/01/02
$19.95
Transaction fee -UB
PAYFLOW /PAYPAL
888 - 883 -9770
TX
5902.6155
* *7370
ERIC ROGGEMAN
2015/01/02
$19.95
Transaction fee
PAYFLOW /PAYPAL
888- 883 -9770
TX
1160.6155
* *7370
ERIC ROGGEMAN
2015/01/05
$15.00
Registration
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT F
651 - 7927036
MN
1160.6104
* *0143
DEB MANGEN
2015/01/06
$41.65
Notary Stamp
NOTARY ROTARY, INC
515- 309 -1351
IA
1180.6103
* *0143
DEB MANGEN
2015/01/06
$120.00
Notary Commission
SECRETARY OF STATE
651 - 2011368
MN
1180.6103
* *0143
DEB MANGEN
2015/01/16
$440.00
Conference Fee
GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE
651 - 222 -7409
MN
1180.6104
* *0143
DEB MANGEN
2015/01/21
$494.20
Air Fare
DELTA AIR 0062379556108
DELTA.COM
CA
1180.6104
* *0143
DEB MANGEN
2015/01/24
$306.34
Lodging
HOTEL WINNESHIEK
DECORAH
IA
1180.6104
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2014/12/31
$89.50
MLS Access Fee
REALTOR ASSOCIATION /MLS
312 - 329 -8245
IL
1190.6105
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/07
$79.00
Appraisal Summit
LBP *REALESTATECOMMGRP
312 - 416 -1860
IL
1190.6104
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/16
$480.00
Course Registration
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1190.6104
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/16
$480.00
Course Registration
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1190.6104
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/16
$100.00
MAAO Membership
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1190.6105
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/17
$100.00
MAAO Membership
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1190.6105
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/17
$100.00
MAAO Membership
MINNESOTA ASSOC OF ASSES
763 - 569 -3357
MN
1190.6105
* *0184
ROBERT WILSON
2015/01/22
$89.00
Standards of Practice
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
816- 7018100
MO
1190.6104
GAPurchasing cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 3/26/2015
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2014/12/26
$355.00
Conference Registration
U OF M CCE NONCREDIT
612 - 625 -4259
MN
1260.6104
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2015/01/12
$120.00
Notary Renewal
SECRETARY OF STATE
651 - 2011368
MN
1260.6105
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2015/01/22
$500.00
Software
AZTECA SYSTEMS INC
801- 5232751
UT
1263.6104
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2015/01/22
$730.00
Conference Registration
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCI
312 - 4319100
IL ,
1260.6104
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2015/01/23
$10.13
Highlighter Tape
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1262.6406
* *9180
MILLNER CHAD
2015/01/23
$68.26
3M Corner Maker /Stand
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1262.6406
* *4882
ANDERSON SHAWN
2014/12/29
$70.00
Registration
U OF M CCE NONCREDIT
612 - 625 -4259
MN
1281.6104
* *4882
ANDERSON SHAWN
2014/12/29
($18.81)
Louver and Adaptor
BTR OF MINNESOTA LLC
952 - 895 -5220
MN
1314.6406
* *4882
ANDERSON SHAWN
2014/12/31
$94.93
Rivets
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
BURNSVILLE
MN
1301.6406
* *4882
ANDERSON SHAWN
2015/01/16
$360.00
Course Registration
CENTURY COLLEGE -CE
651- 7731778
MN
1281.6104
* *4882
ANDERSON SHAWN
2015/01/16
$360.00
Course Registration
CENTURY COLLEGE -CE
651 - 7731778
MN
1281.6104
* *7440
DAN MCMAHON
2014/12/30
$726.36
Certification
MNSCU
877 - 4666728
MN
1281.6107
* *7440
DAN MCMAHON
2015/01/07
$25.00
Boilers License Fee
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1
651 - 2845528
MN
1280.6105
* *7440
DAN MCMAHON
2015/01/14
$45.00
Boilers License Fee
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1
651- 2845528
MN
1281.6104
* *7440
DAN MCMAHON
2015/01/16
$110.00
3 Utley Park Inspections
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND 1
651 - 2845528
MN
47083.6710
* *7756
GARY WELLS
2014/12/29
$37.48
Gas Can
NORTHERN TOOL EQUIPMNT
BURNSVILLE
MN
5913.6406
* *7756
GARY WELLS
2014/12/31
$281.64
Brinkmann 800 - 500 -1Q -Beams
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
5920.6406
* *7756
GARY WELLS
2015/01/07
$161.94
12V Lead (6)
BATTERIES PLUS #18
ST. LOUIS PAR
MN
5912.6530
* *7756
GARY WELLS
2015/01/21
$271.60
Q -Beam 3 LED w /Red N Vision
GIH *GLOBALINDUSTRIALEQ
800 - 645 -2986
FL
5920.6406
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2014/12/29
$79.92
Supplies
DT *DULUTH TRADING CO
877 - 382 -2345
WI
5913.6406
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2015/01/05
$48.22
Straw Bales
BACHMAN'S INC #0006
PLYMOUTH
MN
5913.6406
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2015/01/05
$45.02
Supplies
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
5913.6406
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2015/01/08
$114.00
Course Registration
OWPSACSTATE
916 - 278 -6142
CA
5919.6104
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2015/01/15
$79.00
Membership
ATSSA
540 - 3681701
VA
5919.6104
* *6368
DAVE GOERGEN
2015/01/16
$135.00
Registration
PAYPAL *FRESHWATERS
402 - 935 -7733
MN
5919.6104
* *1175
JOHN SCHEERER
2015/01/01
$42.24
Tools
ENCO
800 - 873 -3626
NY
1301.6556
* *1175
JOHN SCHEERER
2015/01/08
$125.00
Training
ATSSA
540 - 3681701
VA
1280.6104
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/05
$85.00
Renewal Fees
FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSO
703 - 6321990
VA
1400.6105
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/05
$85.00
Renewal Fees
FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY ASSO
703 - 6321990
VA
1400.6105
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/06
$130.00
Membership Renewal
MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLIC
651 - 4570677
MN
1400.6105
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/07
$22.00
Dishwasher part
IN *BAILEY'S TEST STRIPS
201 - 3438004
NJ
1490.6406
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/09
$121.75
USB Flash Drives
MICRO CENTER #045 RETAIL
ST LOUIS PARK
MN
1400.6160
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/23
$40.37
Squad Car Cutting Tool
MED TECH RESOURCES - E
800 - 6930032
OR
1400.6160
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/23
$114.39
Shoe Shine Supplies
SHOETREEMARKETPLACE.CO
866 - 2918472
CT
1400.6406
* *2929
DAVID NELSON
2015/01/23
$47.74
Shoe Stuff
I. SAMUELS SONS 5190
724 - 652 -9761
PA
1400.6406
* *4334
RYAN SCHULTZ
2014/12/30
$440.00
Device Purchase
ACTIVE911 INC
541- 223 -7992
OR
1419.6106
* *4334
RYAN SCHULTZ
2015/01/06
($370.94) Gear
L A POLICE GEAR INC
VALENCIA
CA
1400.6203
* *4334
RYAN SCHULTZ
2015/01/09
$25.28
Files and Tote
OFFICE MAX
EDINA
MN
1419.6106
* *4334
RYAN SCHULTZ
2015/01/22
$44.97
Glock Sight and Nut Driver
LONE WOLF DISTRIBUTORS
208 - 4370612
ID
1400.6610
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2014/12/30
$205.00
Conference Registration
SQ *TIFFANY THOMPSON
RICE
MN
1400.6104
GAPuriping cards\2015 purchasing card electronic fles�2015 USB Purchasing Ca &gister.xlsx 26/2015
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *5621
MARKABIERMAIER
2014/12/30
$205.00
Conference Registration
SQ *TIFFANY THOMPSON
RICE
MN
1400.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/08
$575.00
Training
ACT *ATOM
877 - 551 -5560
CA
1400.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/09
$50.00
Membership
PAYPAL *TAPE
402 - 935 -7733
CA
1400.6105
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$147.94
Rental Car
ADVANTAGE CAR # 060201
DENVER
CO
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/12
$69.00
Dues Renewal
APCO INTERNATIONAL INC
386 - 9442422
FL
2310.6105
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$6.00
Airfare
FRONTIER Al 4220618260193
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$30.00
Airfare
FRONTIER AI 4220618260194
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$184.20
Airfare
FRONTIER Al 4222181860091
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$164.20
Airfare
FRONTIER AI 4222181859990
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$6.00
Airfare
FRONTIER Al 4220618260067
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/13
$30.00
Airfare
FRONTIER Al 4220618260068
FAREFAMILIES
OK
2310.6104
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/14
$137.00
Office Services
NENA
703 - 812 -4600
VA
2310.6105
* *5621
MARK A BIERMAIER
2015/01/20
$175.00
Registration
ACT *ATOM
877- 551 -5560
CA
1400.6104
* *8481
TOM SCHMITZ
2014/12/29
$592.15
Fire Academy Meals -2014
NFPA NATL FIRE PROTECT
800 - 344 -3555
MA
1470.6614
* *8481
TOM SCHMITZ
2014/12/29
$108.04
Fire & CO Brochures
JONES &BARTLETT LEARNING
978 - 443 -5000
MA
1470.6579
* *8481
TOM SCHMITZ
2015/01/17
$358.95
Training Aids
TRAINERS WAREHOUSE
508- 653 -3770
MA
1470.6579
* *8481
TOM SCHMITZ
2015/01/25
$66.00
Food
GUEST SERVICES -UNIT 3750
EMMITSBURG
MD
1470.6104
* *8499
CRAIG ESSIG
2015/01/22
$845.00
FDIC Conference
PEN *FDIC /FIRE ENGINEER
800- 331 -4463
OK
1470.6104
* *8499
CRAIG ESSIG
2015/01/22
$845.00
FDIC Conference
PEN *FDIC /FIRE ENGINEER
800 - 331 -4463
OK
1470.6104
* *8499
CRAIG ESSIG
2015/01/22
$895.00
FDIC Conference
PEN *FDIC /FIRE ENGINEER
800 - 331 -4463
OK
1470.6104
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2014/12/26
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPAY
888 -294 -6804
CA
1470.6188
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2015/01/08
$40.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PREPAID PYMNT
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1470.6188
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2015/01/16
$1,695.00
AED
AED SUPERSTORE
800 - 544 -0048
WI
1470.6510
* *0927
DARRELL TODD
2015/01/15
$250.00
Ultrasound Battery
FUJIFILM SONOSITE INC.
425 - 9511200
WA
1470.6510
* *0927
DARRELL TODD
2015/01/15
$85.76
Alarm
THE HOME DEPOT 2805
BLOOMINGTON
MN
1470.6406
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2015/01/20
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1470.6188
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2015/01/21
$4.00
Parking
FSH PARKING OFFICE
EDINA
MN
1470.6107
* *0927
DARRELLTODD
2015/01/24
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1470.6188
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2014/12/26
$93.79
Plot Bond
G.S. DIRECT, INC.
952 - 942 -6115
MN
1495.6406
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2015/01/02
$260.00
Membership
ACT *10KLAKES BUILD MEM
877 - 551 -5560
CA
1495.6105
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2015/01/03
$1,838.00
Code Books
INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC
888 - 422 -7233
IL
1495.6405
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2015/01/07
$253.64
Copy Machine Use
CANON SOLUTIONS AMERIC
773 - 714 -8500
IL
1495.6406
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2015/01/13
$126.36
Supplies
BMK SOLUTIONS CORP
952- 7463195
MN
1495.6406
* *2512
DAVID FISHER
2015/01/15
$49.99
Subscription -iPad Software
PLANGRID
PLANGRID.COM
CA
1495.6105
* *4619
TIM BARNES
2015/01/13
$25.75
Orange Ekcoscreen
IN *EKCOS INNOVATIONS
925 - 3711277
CA
1552.6406
* *4619
TIM BARNES
2015/01/15
$211.37
Orange Ekcoscreens
IN *EKCOS INNOVATIONS
925 - 3711277
CA
1552.6406
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/06
$104.50
Training
VCN * *MNSTATEPATROL
866 - 255 -1857
MN
1281.6104
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/07
$95.00
Training
HTC CUSTOM TRAINING
952 - 9951300
MN
1281.6104
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/08
$95.00
Training
HTC CUSTOM TRAINING
952 - 9951300
MN
1281.6104
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/08
$90.00
Training
DAKOTA TECH CUSTOM TRAINI
651 - 4238301
MN
1281.6104
GAPurchasing cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 3/26/2015
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/15
$443.52
Lubricants
INTERSTATE PRODUCTS
800 - 474 -7294
FL
1553.6584
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/14
$137.41
Keys
MINNEAPOLIS LOCK AND KEY
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1553.6585
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/20
$122.00
Rubber Sleeve
VENTAIRE
952 - 8946637
MN
1553.6530
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/22
$127.95
Floorliner
WEATHERTECH MACNEIL
800 - 441 -6287
IL
1553.6530
* *1996
GUNNAR KAASA
2015/01/23
$24.75
Cool White
WWW.SUPERBRIGHTLEDS.COM
WWW.SUPERBRIG
MO
1553.6530
* *9798
SUSAN WAACK
2015/01/21
$36.00
APWA Posters
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS
DAN.PAVLICH @C
MO
5913.6406
* *9798
SUSAN WAACK
2015/01/22
$519.38
Plates
MN DVS ST LS PK 001 695
SAINT LOUIS P
MN
1553.6260
* *9798
SUSAN WAACK
2015/01/22
$12.72
Plates
MN DVS STLSPK 001 695 FEE
KNOXVILLE
TN
1553.6260
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2014/12/31
$89.00
Pro !Pad Air Keyboard Case
CLAMCASE, LLC
800 - 939 -0335
CA
1140.6406
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2014/12/31
$89.00
Pro iPad Air Keyboard Case
CLAMCASE, LLC
800 - 939 -0335
CA
1170.6406
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2014/12/31
$89.00
Pro iPad Air Keyboard Case
CLAMCASE, LLC
800 - 939 -0335
CA
1600.6513
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2014/12/31
$180.00
Pro !Pad Air Keyboard Case
CLAMCASE, LLC
800 - 939 -0335
CA
1554.6710
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2015/01/09
($13.50)
Car Charger
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1554.6406
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2015/01/12
$49.95
Golf Dome Screen Lock Software
FS *E- MOTIONAL
877 - 3278914
CA
5210.6406
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2015/01/13
$50.45
Plantronics Handset Lifter
AMAZON.COM
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1554.6188
* *2481
RYAN BROWNING
2015/01/15
$141.16
K9 Data Card
AT &T *BILL PAYMENT
800 - 288 -2020
TX
1554.6188
* *5587
DAWN BEITEL
2015/01/16
($123.37)
Pool Pass
EDINA STORE
9529278861
MN
5301.4532
* *5587
DAWN BEITEL
2015/01/17
$25.00
Gogurt- Concessions
CUB FOODS
CHANHASSEN
MN
5730.5510
* *5587
DAWN BEITEL
2015/01/16
$123.37
Pool Pass
EDINA STORE
952 - 927 -8861
MN
5301.4532
* *6841
ANN KATTREH
2015/01/03
$69.72
Warm /Cool Mist
MENARDS RICHFIELD
RICHFIELD
MN
1600.6406
* *6841
ANN KATTREH
2015/01/19
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAYAUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1600.6188
* *7279
DONNA TILSNER
2015/01/07
$35.00
Annual Meeting & Awards Lunch
MN RECREATION AND PARKA
763 - 571 -1305
MN
1600.6104
* *7279
DONNA TILSNER
2015/01/09
$104.52
OFFICE SUPPLIES
AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1628.6406
* *7279
DONNA TILSNER
2015/01/22
$27.91
Greeting Cards
CURRENT USA
800 - 525 -7170
CO
1628.6406
* *7130
ERIC BOETTCHER
2015/01/05
$76.36
Folders
STAPLES 00119180
BLOOMINGTON
MN
1622.6406
* *6032
KRISTIN AARSVOLD
2014/12/29
$100.00
OTHER
GENERAL SPORTS - B
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
1629.6406
* *6032
KRISTIN AARSVOLD
2014/12/29
$74.33
Trainers
PAYPAL *HOCKEYGIANT
402 - 935 -7733
CA
1629.6406
* *0756
BOB PRESTRUD
2015/01/06
$219.40
Mittens and Liners
FISHUSA.COM
814 - 459 -7800
PA
1646.6610
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2014/12/29
($5.00)
About Town Test
EDINA STORE
9529278861
MN
1130.6123
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2014/12/29
$5.00
About Town Test
EDINA STORE
952 - 927 -8861
MN
1130.6123
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2014/12/30
$23.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
AMAZON.COM
AMZN.COM /BILL
WA
1130.6406
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2014/12/30
$56.68
Meeting
EDINA GRILL
EDINA
MN
1130.6106
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2014/12/31
$13.96
OFFICE SERVICES
FACEBOOK PXF7R6E532
650 - 6187714
CA
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/03
$10.72
Photoshop
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/05
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1130.6188
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/06
$475.00
Social Media Conference
EB 2015 GOVERNMENT SO
888 - 810 -2063
CA
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/05
$53.63
Creative Cloud - Denfeld
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6406
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/06
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888- 294 -6804
CA
1130.6188
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/06
$77.97
Social Media Conf- Lodging
ATLANTIS CASINO RESORT
RENO
NV
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/06
$53.63
Creative Cloud - Denfeld
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6406
G: \Purisng cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing CaIN gister.xlsx 6/2015
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/06
$385.20
Social Media Conf - Airfare
USAIRWAYS 0372386251000
800- 428 -4322
AZ
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/10
$50.00
Monthly service fee
MAILCHIMP
MAILCHIMP.COM
GA
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/11
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1130.6188
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/12
$53.63
Creative Cloud - Kaylin
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/13
$11.96
Subscription
THE STAR TRIBUNE CIRCULAT
612 - 6734343
MN
1130.6105
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/14
$53.63
Creative Cloud -Megan
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/15
($3.64)
Creative Cloud Sales Tax Credit
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6406
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/15
($3.64)
Creative Cloud Sales Tax Credit
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6406
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/18
$5.00
Spam Blocker
AKSMT.COM
877 - 273 -3049
CA
1130.6124
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/18
$29.95
Online Invoicing
2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS
416- 481 -6946
ON
1130.6103
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/19
$50.00
Advertising
FACEBOOK AYHMU6E532
650 - 6187714
CA
9234.6106
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/20
($15.75)
Travel Insurance Refund
TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY
RICHMOND
VA
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/20
$15.75
Travel Insurance
TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY
800- 729 -6021
VA
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/20
$250.00
Google Site Search
GOOGLE * GOOGLE INC
GOOGLE.COM /CH
CA
1130.6124
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/20
$325.00
NAB Show - Denfeld
NAB SHOW REGISTRATION
202- 429 -5304
DC
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/20
$250.20
Airfare NAB Show - Denfeld
SUN COUNTRY 3377533705003
NORWALK
CT
1130.6104
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/22
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1130.6188
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/23
($759.31)
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC.
800 - 833 -6687
CA
1130.6406
* *2293
JENNIFER BENNEROTTE
2015/01/25
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1100.6160
* *5821
AMY SMITH
2015/01/14
$49.00
Stamps
USPS 26632704333409905
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
5410.6235
* *8318
TOM SWENSON
2015/01/14
$9.00
Parking
PLZA MPLSPARKING
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
5410.6104
* *8318
TOM SWENSON
2015/01/15
$12.00
Parking
PLZA MPLSPARKING
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
5410.6104
* *5811
JOSEPH ABOOD
2015/01/12
$105.60
Task Force Lunch
CHEETAH PIZZA
EDINA
MN
5410.6406
* *5811
JOSEPH ABOOD
2015/01/16
$7.98
Task Force Meeting
CUB FOODS #31644
PLYMOUTH
MN
5410.6406
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2014/12/28
$20.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888- 294 -6804
CA
5440.6406
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2014/12/29
($95.00)
Test
EDINA STORE
9529278861
MN
5401.4602
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2014/12/29
$95.00
Test
EDINA STORE
952 - 927 -8861
MN
5401.4602
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/03
$20.89
Supplies
OFFICE DEPOT #415
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
5410.6513
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/05
($25.00)
Test
EDINA STORE
9529278861
MN
5401.4602
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/05
$25.00
Test
EDINA STORE
952 - 927 -8861
MN
5401.4602
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/06
$37.74
Shipping
FEDEX 772452129568
MEMPHIS
TN
5440.6122
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/06
$38.97
Shipping
FEDEX 772452132119
MEMPHIS
TN
5440.6122
* *8806
MARY WOOLDRIDGE
2015/01/09
$10.73
Shipping
FEDEX 780166775147
800 - 4633339
TN
5440.6122
* *4673
SUSIE MILLER
10/16/2014
87.52
Conference - Lodging
COUNTRY INN AND SUITES
STEVENS POINT
WI
5511.6103
* *4673
SUSIE MILLER
10/16/2014
87.52 Conference - Lodging
COUNTRY INN AND SUITES
STEVENS POINT
WI
5511.6103
* *7354
JASON COTTEN
2015/01/20
$100.00
Vehicle Expense
KUSTOM KARRIERS
952 - 936 -4680
MN
5511.6406
* *7010
AMANDA HOLLE
2015/01/07
$307.12
Advertising
PAYPAL * EDINA STORE
402 - 935 -7733
MN
5510.6103
* *7010
AMANDA HOLLE
2015/01/07
$241.37
WHOLESALE TRADE
BARTLEY SALES CO INC
952 - 929 -0001
MN
5510.6103
* *9328
MICHAEL FREY
2015/01/15
$256.46
Gallery
BUCA DI BEPPO- MINNEAPOLI
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
5120.6406
* *9328
MICHAEL FREY
2015/01/15
$30.00
Dues
PAYPAL *SPRINGBOARD
402- 935 -7733
CA
5110.6105
GAPurchasing cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 3/26/2015
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *9665
SUSAN FAUS
2015/01/02
$30.00
Data Plan
VZWRLSS *PRPAY AUTOPAY
888 - 294 -6804
CA
1600.6188
* *1282
PATRICIA MCGRATH
2015/01/03
$35.48
Postage
PITNEY BOWES*
800 - 228 -1071
CT
5710.6235
* *1282
PATRICIA MCGRATH
2015/01/09
$100.00
Postage
POSTAGE REFILL
800 - 468 -8454
CT
5710.6235
* *1282
PATRICIA MCGRATH
2015/01/23
$837.30
Vests
THE LIFEGUARD STORE IN
309 - 451 -5858
IL
5310.6610
* *5746
RICHARD JOHNS
2015/01/07
$347.45
Battery Charger & Vacuum
THE HOME DEPOT 2805
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5720.6406
* *5746
RICHARD JOHNS
2015/01/14
($5.34)
Magnet
THE HOME DEPOT 2805
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5720.6406
* *5746
RICHARD JOHNS
2015/01/14
$129.00
Hand Vac Batteries
THE HOME DEPOT 2805
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5720.6406
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2014/12/26
$150.00
BUSINESS EXPENS
MN NURSERY LANDSCAPE AS
555 - 5555555
MN
5760.6104
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2014/12/29
$98.00
Banners
USPS 26632704333409905
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
5760.6235
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2014/12/29
$5.19
Pulley V -Belt
JERRY'S DO IT BEST
EDINA
MN
5761.6530
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2014/12/30
$79.75
Acrylic Sheet and Sta -Bil
MENARDS RICHFIELD
RICHFIELD
MN
5761.6406
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2014/12/31
$25.18
Grocery
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
5761.5510
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/03
$22.04
Grocery
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
5761.5510
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/07
$25.98
Supplies
MENARDS RICHFIELD
RICHFIELD
MN
5761.6406
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/08
$47.15
Parts
PAYPAL *STEENENTERP
402 - 935 -7733
CA
5761.6530
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/09
$125.19
Grocery
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
5761.5510
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/18
$122.30
Grocery
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
5761.5510
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/16
$22.89
OTHER
LUE
805- 619 -8583
AL
5760.6105
* *0116
TOM SHIRLEY
2015/01/17
$29.00
Office Supplies
WHENIWORK.COM
651 - 330 -4482
MN
5760.6105
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2014/12/30
$32.65
Decorations
PARTY CITY #773
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5822.6406
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2014/12/30
$32.65
Decorations
PARTY CITY #773
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5842.6406
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2014/12/30
$32.64
Decorations
PARTY CITY #773
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5862.6406
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2015/01/06
$1,287.30
Parking Permits - 50th /France
CITY OF EDINA RECEPTIONIS
EDINA
MN
5820.6260
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2015/01/10
$18.37
Aluminum Flat Bar
THE HOME DEPOT 2805
BLOOMINGTON
MN
5841.6406
* *0093
STEVEN GRAUSAM
2015/01/16
$27.87
Sawhorses
MENARDS RICHFIELD
RICHFIELD
MN
5841.6406
* *7251
KATE WISSER
2015/01/18
$24.00
Circle Stickers
STICKER MULE
800 - 975 -9465
NY
5822.6406
* *7251
KATE WISSER
2015/01/18
$46.00
Circle Stickers
STICKER MULE
800 - 975 -9465
NY
5842.6406
* *7251
KATE WISSER
2015/01/18
$46.00
Circle Stickers
STICKER MULE
800 - 975 -9465
NY
5862.6406
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/04
$35.52
Personal Purchase - Reimbursed
WALGREENS #13753
EDINA
MN
7401.8070
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/05
$36.76
Couplings, Adapters, Brush
JERRY'S DO IT BEST
EDINA
MN
7411.6530
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/12
$231.34
Supplies
THE HOME DEPOT 2812
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/17
$21.25
TV Mount
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7411.6406
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/21
$58.26
Fasteners, Glide, Scraper
JERRY'S DO IT BEST
EDINA
MN
7412.6406
* *2223
GREG BRETSON
2015/01/22
$26.13
Scraper, Glide
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/02
$39.42
Email service
EMA *EMMA EMAIL MARKETING
800 - 5954401
TN
7410.6122
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/06
$19.31
Supplies
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
7414.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/07
$10.97
Bakery
CUB FOODS #3124
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
7411.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/07
$63.20
Training Aids
SQ *POSTAL DISPATCH BUSIN
BLOOMINGTON
MN
7414.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/12
$40.69
Grocery
CUB FOODS #3124
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
7414.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/20
$101.52
Sign
ULINE *SHIP SUPPLIES
800 - 295 -5510
IL
7414.6406
G: \Purng cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing Car gister.xlsx 6/2015
i i •
CITY OF EDINA
CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER
12/26/14- 01/25/15
Account
Name
Date
Amount
Description
Vendor
City
State
Account
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/24
$11.27
Mirror
TARGET 00023135
EDINA
MN
7411.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/24
$39.95
Office Supplies
OFFICE MAX
EDINA
MN
7410.6513
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/22
$350.15
Targets
LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS
800 - 7790182
MN
7414.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/23
$48.67
Garment Rack
CONTAIN ERSTOREM INN ESOT
EDINA
MN
7414.6406
* *9956
DEB FIELDS
2015/01/24
$11.14
Hangers and Clips
CONTAINERSTOREMINNESOT
EDINA
MN
7414.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2014/12/31
$30.02
Cleaning Patches
ARNZEN ARMS LLC
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7411.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/01
$59.82
Paint
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/01
$59.84
Paint
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/13
$20.86
Batteries
THE HOME DEPOT 2812
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7411.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/13
$37.70
Carbon Brush
MCMASTER -CARR
630 - 834 -9600
IL
7412.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/19
$12.96
Fittings
THE HOME DEPOT 2812
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/21
$528.04
Ladders and Supplies
MENARDS EDEN PRAIRIE
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
* *0314
GERALD KOPLOS
2015/01/24
$455.61
Cleaning Patches
ARNZEN ARMS LLC
EDEN PRAIRIE
MN
7412.6406
$38,307.12
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
With the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedure date
GAPurchasing cards\2015 purchasing card electronic files\2015 USB Purchasing Card Register.xlsx 3/26/2015
•
•
91
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Fire Department Medical Control and Direction Agreement
Action Requested:
Approve and sign Amendment VII
O e
0
\�rRrotiP��'
Agenda Item #: IV. C.
Action IN
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
Information I Background:
Medical control and direction is required as part of providing an ambulance service. Our current agreement
has been with Hennepin County Medical Center since 2002. Dr. Jeff Ho is resigning his position due to
other commitments within Hennepin County and Dr. Paul Nystrom, Edina Fire Department Associated
Medical Director, will take over the role of Medical Director. Amendment VII to the 2002 Medical Control
and Direction Agreement provides for this transition.
We have a strong working relationship with Hennepin County Medical Center and we have had a very
favorable experience with Dr. Paul Nystrom as our Associate Medical Director. The City attorney has
reviewed all attached documents and has no concerns. Staff recommends approval and signing Amendment
VII.
Attachments:
Original 2002 Medical Control and Direction Agreement
Amendment VII
Certificate of Insurance
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
MEDICAL CONTROL AND DIRECTION
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 2002 ( "Effective Date "), by and
between the City of Edina ( "Edina ") and Hennepin Faculty Associates ( "HFA ").
PREAMBLES
WHEREAS, Edina desires to retain HFA to provide professional support for medical
direction and supervision of the Edina Police Department and the Edina Fire Department,
including, but not limited to, the Advanced Life Support Ambulance Service operated by the
Edina Fire Department (the "Edina Ambulance Services ") and to consult upon request with other
departments of Edina on medical related issues;
WHEREAS, HFA desires to provide medical direction and supervision of the medical
care rendered by the Edina Police Department, Edina Fire Department and the Edina Ambulance
Services, as set forth in this Agreement and to consult upon request with other departments of
Edina on medical related issues.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants and
agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
• Duties of HFA
1.1 Appointment of Medical Director. HFA shall provide Edina with the professional
services of one of its physicians ( "Physician ") who shall serve as the Medical Director for the
Edina Police Department, the Edina Fire Department and the Edina Ambulance Services
( "Medical Director ") and to consult upon request with other departments of Edina on medical
related issues. The Physician as of the Effective Date is Jeffrey Ho, M.D. The physician
rendering medical direction and supervision under the Agreement may change from time to time
by the mutual agreement of the parties.
1.2 Qualifications of Physician. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Physician
shall be licensed as a physician, in good standing, in the State of Minnesota and shall be a
member in good standing of the medical staff of HFA.
1.3 Medical Direction. HFA and Physician will provide medical direction to the Edina
Police Department, Edina Fire Department and Edina Ambulance Services and supervision of
the medical care rendered thereby and to consult upon request with other departments of Edina
on medical related issues. Medical direction shall include the services outlined in Article II.
1.4 Continuing Education. HFA, through its Physician, will provide continuing medical
education services, which will assist the Edina ambulance personnel in maintaining their
certifications as required by the Minnesota Health Department. It may be necessary for the
.7
• Edina ambulance personnel to seek continuing education services beyond those available
through HFA, however HFA will provide the following education services:
A. Presentations on selected clinical topics will be provided on a regular basis by the
Physician or his designee. Any appropriate educational meetings or seminars provided
by HFA to its own staff will also be available to Edina ambulance personnel.
B. Ambulance run reports will be reviewed on a regular basis with the Edina ambulance
personnel, and will provide feedback on performance problems or operating issues.
C. Clinical skills review will be provided for Edina ambulance personnel on a regular basis
under the review of the Physician.
D. HFA will work with Edina ambulance personnel to evaluate the need for and selection of
continuing education resources beyond those available through HFA.
E. Continuing education topics, schedules and locations may be modified by mutual
agreement between HFA and Edina.
ARTICLE II
Medical Direction Services
2.1 HFA Services. In providing medical direction and supervision to the Edina Police
. Department, Edina Fire Department and Edina Ambulance Services and consulting upon request
with other departments of Edina on medical related issues, HFA and Physician shall:
A. Develop and review policies and procedures defining the standards of care and how they
are to be implemented.
B. Review incident reports originating from hospital or ambulance personnel and assist in
resolving citizen, hospital or physician complaints or questions about provision of
emergency medical care.
C. Report ambulance patient care problems and public complaints on ambulance patient care
and transport to Edina.
D. Assist Edina in planning for future changes in the provision of ambulance services by
Edina Ambulance Services and render advice on the purchase of medical equipment and
supplies.
E. Participate in long -range planning efforts to determine the future direction of Edina
Ambulance Services.
F. Provide advice, if requested, on the organization and structure of the ambulance service.
G. Service as a resource and advisor for Edina Ambulance Services personnel regarding
medical care and performance- related concerns.
•
2
H. Participate, if requested, in the selection and evaluation of Edina Ambulance Services
personnel.
I. Consult with other departments of Edina on medical related issues.
2.2 Edina Compliance. In order to facilitate HFA in performing the services and activities
covered by this Agreement, Edina shall:
A. Implement the medical protocols and guidelines developed by Physician for the Edina
Police Department, Edina Fire Department and Edina Ambulance Services and other
departments of Edina.
B. Report patient care problems and public complaints on ambulance patient care and
transport to the Physician.
C. Involve Physician in the evaluation and selection process of patient care equipment.
D. Provide Physician with copies of all ambulance run reports for evaluation and review.
E. Provide Physician with information on the training and certification of all Edina
ambulance personnel.
F. Operate Edina Ambulance Services in accordance with Minnesota Statute Sections
144.801 - 144.8091 (Life Support Transportation Licensing Law) and Minnesota Rules
• 4690.0100 at seq.
2.3 Review of Services. The parties shall meet on a regular basis to review the services
being provided under this Agreement.
ARTICLE III
Payment
In consideration of HFA providing medical control and medical direction services as described
in this Agreement, Edina shall annually pay IIFA the sum of $26,000. Edina certifies that such
compensation paid to HFA is fair market value for medical leadership and is attributable solely
to HFA's services to the Edina Police Department, Edina Fire Department and Edina Ambulance
Services. On or before each December 1 HFA and Edina shall review and approve the amount to
be paid to HFA for providing the services described in the Agreement for the following calendar
year. If parties do not approve a change in the amount paid to HFA under the Agreement for the
following calendar year, HFA shall be paid for such calendar year the same amount payable
under this Agreement for the prior calendar year.
• ARTICLE IV
Independent Contractor Status
4.1 Independent Contractors. The relationship between the parties is such that Edina, HFA
and Physician are independent contractors. Edina shall neither have nor exercise control over the
means or methods by which HFA or Physician performs the services. Nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed as creating an employer - employee relationship between HFA or Physician and
Edina. Neither party shall have the authority or right legally to bind the other in contract, debt or
otherwise, and neither party shall be liable for any obligation acquired or incurred by the other,
except as might otherwise be provided herein. Nothing herein is intended to limit the ability of
HFA or Physician to practice medicine or to contract with other parties. Nothing herein is
intended to limit the ability of Edina to contract with or retain other parties.
4.2 Work Standards. HFA and Physician shall control the manner, method and means of
performing medical direction and supervision to the Edina Police Department, Edina Fire
Department and Edina Ambulance Services. The medical direction shall at all times be
performed in accordance with customary professional standards in the community, consistent
with general HFA policies, rules and regulations.
4.3 Withholding and Taxes. Edina shall not be liable for any withholding or payment,
either for taxes, benefits, or other items on behalf of Physician. HFA shall be exclusively liable
for any benefits, unemployment taxes, unemployment insurance, worker's compensation
• insurance or other withholding from the pay of Physician and other employees of HFA.
4.4 Professional Liability Insurance. HFA shall procure and maintain (a) medical
malpractice or professional liability insurance, or both medical malpractice and professional
liability insurance, with coverage limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $3,000,000 in the
aggregate, and (b) comprehensive general or umbrella liability insurance, or both comprehensive
general and umbrella liability insurance, with coverage limits of $5,000,000 in the aggregate.
HFA's coverage must be placed with responsible, financially sound insurance carriers authorized
or approved to write coverage in the State of Minnesota. HFA's medical malpractice insurance
shall be either occurrence or claims made with an extended period reporting option.
ARTICLE V
INDEMNIFICATION
Edina agrees to indemnify and hold HFA, its officers, directors, contractors (including, without
limitation, physicians with whom HFA contracts for medical direction of the Edina Police
Department, Edina Fire Department and Edina Ambulance Service and other services provided
by HFA under this Agreement), employees and agents harmless from any liability claims,
damages, cost, judgments or expenses resulting directly or indirectly from any act or commission
or omission upon the part of Edina, its officers, agents, employees or contractors in the
performance of its individual services provided by this Agreement and against all loss by reason
of failure of Edina to fully perform in any respect, all obligations under this Agreement. Edina
• acknowledges that it is solely responsible for employment matters with respect to Edina
in
employees, and consequently, the foregoing indemnification applies, without limitation, to
claims made by employees based on their employment relationship with Edina.
HFA agrees to indemnify and hold Edina, its officers, contractors, employees and agents
harmless from any liability claims, damages, cost judgments or expenses resulting directly or
indirectly from any act or commission or omission upon the part of HFA, its officers, agents,
employees or contractors in the performance of its individual services provided by this
Agreement and against all loss by reason of failure of HFA to fully perform in any respect, all
obligations under this Agreement.
Edina's liability pursuant to this article shall be limited to the limits set forth in Minnesota
Statutes 466.04.
ARTICLE VI
Term and Termination
6.1 Term. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue until
terminated.
6.2 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated as follows:
A. By either party, with or without cause, by giving written 60 -day notice of the
• intent to terminate the Agreement.
B. By either party immediately in the event of a material breach or default of this
Agreement by the other which is not cured within thirty (30) days of notice of such default.
•
ARTICLE VII
Miscellaneous
7.1 Assignability. This Agreement is a personal services contract and shall not be assignable
by HFA.
7.2 Modification. This Agreement may be amended or modified at any time by mutual
agreement of HFA and Edina. Such amendment or modification shall be made in writing and
signed by the party against whom the same is sought to be enforced.
7.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Edina and
HFA with respect to the matters addressed herein.
7.4 Governing Law. This Agreement is made in and shall be construed under the laws of
the State of Minnesota.
5
•
•
7.5 Notices. All notices hereunder by either party to the other shall be in writing. All notices,
demands and requests shall be deemed given when mailed, postage prepaid, registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested:
If to Edina at: City of Edina
Attention: City Manager
4801 West 501h Street
Edina, MN 55424
If to HFA at: Hennepin Faculty Associates
Attention: Director of Contracting
700 HFA Building
914 South 8t' Street
Minneapolis, MN 55404
CITY OF EDINA
By l�
Mayor
And 4�t4
CityAanager
2
•
AMENDMENT VII TO THE
MEDICAL CONTROL AND DIRECTION AGREEMENT
The Medical Control and Direction Agreement effective July 1, 2002 ( "Initial Effective Date "), by and
between the City of Edina ( "Edina ") and Hennepin Faculty Associates ( "HFA ") and Assigned to Hennepin
Health System Inc. doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center ( "HCMC ") pursuant to an
Assignment of Contract entered into among HFA, HCMC and Edina dated December 15, 2011 is hereby
amended.
Article 1.1 is amended as follows:
HCMC shall provide Edina with the professional services of one of its physicians ( "Physician ") who shall
serve as the Medical Director of the Edina Police Department, the Edina Fire Department and the Edina
Ambulance Services ( "Medical Director ") and to consult upon request with other departments of Edina on
medical related issues. The Physician as of the Effective Date is Dr. Paul Nystrom, M.D. The physician
rendering medical direction and supervision under the Agreement may change from time to time by the mutual
agreement of the parties.
• This Amendment shall be effective April 7, 2015. Except as described herein, all terms and conditions of
the above referenced Medical Control and Direction Agreement remain in full force and effect.
•
CITY OF EDINA
Mayor
Printed Name:
Date:
And
City Manager
Printed Name:
Date:
HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.,
doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center
By:
Chief Financial Officer
Printed Name: Larryryzaniak
Printed
Date:
• � � � ^ 7701 France Avenue South, Suite 500
(`/_ Minneapolis, MN 55435 -5288
\` 800.328.5532 • Fax 952.838.6808
MMICgroup.com
•
is
Certificate of Insurance
This is to certify that the MMIC Insurance, Inc. has issued to the insured the policy identified herein by policy number, policy
term and limits of liability, which affords PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE.
This certificate of insurance does not amend, extend or otherwise alter the terms, conditions, or limits of the insurance
afforded by the policy.
INSURED'S NAME:
Paul C. Nystrom MD
INSURED TYPE:
Clinic Practitioner
ADDRESS:
HCMC
701 Park Ave
Physician Services
Minneapolis, MN 55415 -1829
POLICY TYPE:
Claims -Made
POLICY NUMBER:
MCL001530
POLICY LIMITS:
$1,000,000 each claim
$3,000,000 aggregate
POLICY TERM:
from 04/01/2015 to
RETROACTIVE DATE:
04/01/2015
01/01/2016
Retroactive Date is the date listed on the Declarations Page which is the first date that coverage applies to any claim or
suit covered under this policy.
If the insured type listed above is shown as a clinic, hospital, or solo practitioner, employees of the insured are included as
additional insureds while acting within the scope of their employment duties for the insured. This additional insured coverage
excludes coverage for interns, externs, residents, dental, osteopathic, chiropractic or medical doctors, podiatrists, nurse
mid- wives, certified registered nurse anesthetists and heart/lung perfusionists.
The cancellation portion of this certificate is left blank and no notice other than that provided by the policy is guaranteed,
promised, or implied fi•om the issuance of this certificate.
COFU 106P
Policy No: MCL001530
Issue Date: 03/12/2015
Page 1 of 1
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: April 7, 2015
�91Na,
o e
Cn
• I��nRPORf'1�O •
1888
Agenda Item #: IV. D.
The Recommended Bid is
❑x Within Budget
❑ Not Within Budget
Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Bid Contract ENG 15 -1 Valley View Road Improvements
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received:
March 19, 2015
Company:
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
Midwest Civil Constructors, LLC
Valley Paving, Inc.
Park Construction Company
• Northdale Construction Company, Inc.
Meyer Contracting, Inc.
Midwest Asphalt Corporation
Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc.
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
General Information:
Bid or Expiration Date:
May 19, 2015
Amount of Quote or Bid:
$1,770,345.08
$1,795,846.90
$1,820,907.11
$1,810,269.56
$1,904,840.46
$1,909,282.51
$2,062,916.35
$2,095,588.81
$1,770,345.08
The project involves the reconstruction Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Mark Terrace Drive. This
segment of Valley View Road is classified as a Municipal State Aid Street. The project will include; concrete
sidewalks, curb and gutter, lighting, on- street bike lanes, upgraded storm sewer system, roundabout at Valley
View Road and Braemar Boulevard, replacement of water services from water main to curb stops, upgrades
to fire hydrants, retaining walls and reconstruction of bituminous pavement.
Landscaping of the boulevard areas between the roadway and sidewalk and the areas around the roundabout
will be landscaped. Due to the longer warranty period associated with the landscaping, a spate contract for
those improvements will be developed. We are close to completing those plans and soliciting bids for that
work. The estimated assessment impacts discussed below estimates the cost of the landscaping within those
calculations.
This project will be funded by municipal state aid, special assessments, respective utility and the Pedestrian and
Cyclist Safety (PACS) funds. Based on the bid results and estimated landscaping costs, the overall project cost
may be reduced by approximately 5.9% although we are anticipating the special assessment to be unchanged
from the value discussed at the public improvement of $7,500 per REU.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER
Page 2
• The final project costs are subject to change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and
turf restoration. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing in 2016.
•
Staff recommends awarding the project to Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
Attachment:
GAPYACENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROf ECTS \CONTRACTS \2015 \ENG 15 -1 Valley View Rd\BA377 VV Rd fr McCauley- Bmemar(Hairpin)W,DMIN \MISC \Item x.x. ENG I S -1 RPP.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
A,
O e
• 7��,ORYOI:A��O •
testa
Agenda Item #: IV. E.
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑x
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: 7101 France Avenue, Rue de France, Easement Settlement,
Hazelton Road Improvement BA -417
Action Requested:
Approve Settlement Agreement and authorize City Attorney to execute the Stipulation of Settlement.
Information / Background:
This roadway improvement project was authorized by City Council & HRA in June 2013. The majority of
the Hazelton Road Improvement project was completed in 2014. Completion of the final elements is
anticipated in 2015.
The feasibility study showed a schematic of a standard four access point roundabout to serve traffic and four
adjacent properties. This design required the Rue de France and Guitar Center properties to agree on a
cross - access easement. This would allow patrons of each business to share a single driveway to enter and
exit the properties. After prolonged negotiations, the owners were unable to come to an agreement on a
cross - access easement. Staff developed an alternate roundabout design with five access points that would
provide a separate access point for each of the properties and constructed the project with that revised
alignment.
As stated in the feasibility report, "permanent right -or -way and temporary easements will be needed from
the Rue de France, Guitar Center, Szechaun Star, and Byerly's. It is anticipated all right -of -way needed will
be donated by the adjacent properties ".
All easements were donated with the exception of the Rue de France property.
The City negotiated a settlement value for the permanent easement of $142,000. This will be funded by the
Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Settlement Agreement and authorize the city attorney to
execute the Stipulation of Settlement.
Attachment:
Stipulation of Settlement
G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS \2013 \ENG 13 -22 Hazelton Rd Impr\ADMIN \MISC \Item IV. E. 7101 France Ave Easement.do«
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
,reMcom FAEGRE BWIER
DWELS
David M. Jann
david.jann @FaegreBD.com
Direct +1612 766 8674
USA . UK . CHINA
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
2200 Wells Fargo Center . 90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 -3901
Phone +1612 766 7000
Fax +1 612 766 1600
March 3, 2015
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Thomas M. Scott
Campbell Knutson Professional Association
1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317
Eagan, MN 55121
Re: Sun Life Property in Edina Minnesota
Dear Mr. Scott:
• Enclosed please find two signed copies each of the Grant of Permanent Easement and Stipulation of
Settlement concerning the property owned by Sun Life in Edina, Minnesota. The Grant of Permanent
Easement document is provided to you subject to the following conditions:
1) The Grant of Permanent Easement is hereby delivered in escrow only.
2) You agree to hold the Grant of Permanent Easement in escrow at your law office.
3) You agree to hold the Grant of Permanent Easement in escrow until I authorize you to release it
to the City of Edina, which authorization will be provided when the Edina City Council approves
the Stipulation of Settlement and issues a check payable to Sun Life in the amount $142,000.
4) You agree to comply with items 1 through 3, above, and if you do not, you agree that you will
immediately return the Grant of Permanent Easement document to me.
Thanlc you for your assistance in this matter, and please do not hesitate to call me should you have any
questions.
Very truly yours,
ir6tt' -u` (�_ W,+,�,�
David M. Jann
0 JANDM
Enclosures
US.55824655.01
•
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
This Stipulation of Settlement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation ( "Sun Life "). The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Sun Life will execute and deliver to City a Grant of Permanent Easement in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
40 2. The City will pay a total amount of $142,000.00 to Sun Life in settlement of any
and all claims relating to or arising out of the Hazelton Road Improvement Project, the
acquisition by the City of the permanent easement described on Exhibit A hereto, and the Waiver
of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement between the parties, including compensation for damages,
reimbursement for appraisal costs, interest, attorney's fees, right of first refusal pursuant to
Minn. Stat. §117.226, costs and disbursements. Payment will be made within ten (10) days of
receipt of the original Grant of Permanent Easement and approval by the City Council, which
approval shall be considered within thirty (30) days of receipt of this stipulation and easement
from Sun Life.
3. Sun Life shall be responsible for any tenant claims relating to any construction
interferences arising from and directly related to the City's road construction project on the Sun
0 Life property conducted during the Summer of 2014
1
1789360
4. The easement conveyed to the City is subject to the following condition: should the
City at any time in the future alter the configuration of access to and from the property, or uses the
easement rights conveyed to undertake any action that limits or diminishes the visibility of the
property from surrounding roadways, the City shall be responsible for any damages that are
compensable in accordance with applicable law.
agreement.
This Stipulation of Settlement contains all the terms and conditions of the parties'
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Date: , 20_ By:
Date:, 20
178936v7
Thomas M. Scott, #98498
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
651- 452 -5000
Attorneys for City of Edina
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
Title-
By:— �^'�
Name: Charles S. Nides
Authorix N9nvr
Title:
2
EXHIBIT A
TO
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
• and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
is
does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its
successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for street purposes over, across, on,
under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as
legally described on the attached Exhibit "A ".
The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City,
its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement
premises; and that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City.
1789360
0
•
0
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this -� ) `f
day of ji c -,2015-.
Date: M(� Z6L- l , 20�S-.
STATE OF
COUNTY OF )ss. }
GRANTOR:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
Na:. LIZ
Title:
By:
Name: Charles S. Andes
Authorized Signar
Title:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
20 �j' , by : and
respectively the I A; �',S,hqr and
fT�.A,�r,��< �4 c r,2� of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, a Delaware
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
/
NOTARY PUBLI
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporation Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: 651- 452 -5000
TMS/cjh
1789360
��e& DONN ;q��A�LA
¢ Nota P
COMMONWEALTH pp uASS
MASSACHUSETTS
MY Commission Expires
April 4, 2019
•
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcel 18
A permanent easement for street purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1,
Yorktown as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County
Minnesota, which lies southerly and southeasterly of the Line A described as follows:
Line A: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54
seconds East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof, 245.84 feet to the point of beginning of
Line A to be hereinafter described; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds West, 38.35
feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 second East, 7.08 feet; thence southwesterly along a
non - tangential curve, concave the northwest, 23.58 feet, having a radius of 34.00 feet, central angle
of 39 degrees 44 minutes 06 seconds, chord bearing of South 51 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds
West and a chord distance of 23.11 feet; thence continue southwesterly along a compound curve,
tangent to the last described, 65.18 feet, having a radius of 187.50 feet, central angle of 19 degrees
54 minutes 59 seconds, chord bearing of South 81 degrees 07 minutes 09 West and a chord
distance of 64.85 feet; thence North 88 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds West, 100.87 feet; thence
westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, 28.63 feet, having a radius of 1027.00 feet,
central angle of 01 degrees 35 minutes 51 seconds, chord bearing of North 89 degrees 43 minutes
15 seconds West and a chord distance of 28.63 feet; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 49
seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 123.54 feet the northerly highway easement line as
9 described in Document Number 2189613.
0
(Torrens Certificate of Title No. 1367504)
5
1789360
0
0
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its
successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for street purposes over, across, on,
under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as
legally described on the attached Exhibit "A ".
The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City,
its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement
premises; and that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City.
180296v1
•
•
•
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this law,
day of C , 2015-
0 1 J ..
Date: (�'�� , 2015-
0 1
STATE OF ) C 5Sc"( AvTk
I )ss.
COUNTY OF 0 )(40 I L )
GRANTOR:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
C
N
Title:
V
By:
Name: Ohades S. Andes
Authorized Signer
Title:
i The foregoing instrument 1was acknowl dged before me this >� day of
-X _ k , 20 , by 4 t � .. ! and
1 respectively the .t and
of Sun Life Assurance Company of Ca ada, a Delaware
corporation, on beha f of said corporation.
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporation Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: 651- 452 -5000
TMS /cjh
180296v1
NOTARY PU LIC
DONNA M, CALLAHAN
Notary Public
utcOMMONWEALTH OF MA88ACHU1RT1
My Commission Expifeg
April 4. 2019
•
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcel 18
A permanent easement for street purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1,
Yorktown as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County
Minnesota, which lies southerly and southeasterly of the Line A described as follows:
Line A: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54
seconds East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof, 245.84 feet to the point of beginning of
Line A to be hereinafter described; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds West, 38.35
feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 second East, 7.08 feet; thence southwesterly along a
non - tangential curve, concave the northwest, 23.58 feet, having a radius of 34.00 feet, central angle
of 39 degrees 44 minutes 06 seconds, chord bearing of South 51 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds
West and a chord distance of 23.11 feet; thence continue southwesterly along a compound curve,
tangent to the last described, 65.18 feet, having a radius of 187.50 feet, central angle of 19 degrees
54 minutes 59 seconds, chord bearing of South 81 degrees 07 minutes 09 West and a chord
distance of 64.85 feet; thence North 88 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds West, 100.87 feet; thence
westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, 28.63 feet, having a radius of 1027.00 feet,
central angle of 01 degrees 35 minutes 51 seconds, chord bearing of North 89 degrees 43 minutes
15 seconds West and a chord distance of 28.63 feet; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 49
seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 123.54 feet the northerly highway easement line as
• described in Document Number 2189613.
n
(Torrens Certificate of Title No. 1367504)
180296vl
II I, PARCEL 3
2
11 2
iI
ij .
I I , � SDf•�1'S1'.
I. HICHWA EASEMENT
IPER D NO. 21 13
FOR BLOCK 1
ROAD EASEMENT
W. 10 FT. LOT 2. 31 OCN 7
1 PER DOC. NO, 10 6 134
I
rE7AWING l -v(.0 s0o °) I�59�'I 1141.01 1.1.43
E•iSELiEIJT UOC 1I 218901.1
17.13 \� �� - -- 589 °VO'on
_ \ -
SOp °00'00 "E �\
\ \ \
4 '\
63.71 509 °5I'IS'E - S90-00, 00-111 R- 9D13.1 'y IV5.9) Rc26 456- 00 p 30.17
L =55.09 `CO 87600 '46" ` 531 E NIAOID °11�
GD'}3.65�
I
I
l
�I
i
rn 0 50 100
v
m
w
N
0
® PROPOSED PERMANENT ROADWAY, SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA = 2,272 sq ft
0
[Man PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA = 7.614 sq ft
s
X
® 701Xenla Avenue South, Suite 300 France Avenue Improvements
� e+ Minneapolis, MN 55416 � ' � �
SB www.wsbeng.com Easement Parcel Sketch '
0
--- .�.... , "NW-Fax763d41 -1700 City of Edina, Minnesota
INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CONSTRUCTION un
I
WSB Project No. 1686400
REVISED DATE: 2/1/2014
Parcel No. 18
Exhibit B
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Promenade Phase 4 Funding Update
Action Requested:
N/A
Information / Background:
o e �
v /•'�CORPOB ,�w9•
Agenda Item #: IV. F.
Action ❑
Discussion ❑
Information x❑
Please recall the council awarded the Promenade Phase 4 Project to Peterson Companies at the March 17
City Council meeting. We were tasked with providing funding options to the council for discussion. Based
on how the bid unit prices of Peterson Companies affected funding sources previously discussed, we only
provided the recommended funding sources detailed below.
FUNDING BY SOURCE
Low Bidder
2nd Low Bidder
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION
$1268;-550
$1,443,339.23
Construction Professional Services
$14800
$141,800
TOTAL
$ 41 n 3 rn
$1,585,139
FUNDING BY SOURCE
Original
Fig
Revised Funding
Notes:
Park Dedication
$640,000
$640,000
Same amount as original award
Tax Increment Funds (TIF) / HRA
$519,513
$519,513
Same amount as original award
Utility Fund — Storm
$20069
$292,763
Changed due to bid unit prices
Grants and Donations
$3000
$39,000
Hennepin County ERF Grant
Reimbursable to 71 France Developer
$11,568
$13,863
71 France Developer
PACS
$0
$80,000
Sidewalk Construction
TOTAL
$1,410,350
$1,585,139
Attachments:
GAPW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DMPROJECTS\CONTRACTSUOMENG 14 -8 Promenade Phase 41ADMIMMISC \Item IV. F. Promenade PH funding Reporcdocx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: David Nelson
Chief of Police
�<p. A, ll?l
1888
Agenda Item #: IV. G.
Action ❑X
Discussion ❑
Date: April 07, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -3 I. Authorizing the execution of the DWI Grant Enforcement
Officer program.
Action Requested:
Resolve that the Edina Police Department be authorized to administer a grant from the State of
Minnesota, Department of Public Safety to achieve traffic safety objectives in the area of DWI
enforcement.
This resolution will be effective for four years from the signing and submission of the grant agreement,
anticipated to begin June I st 2015. The State of Minnesota will require that the grantee submit a yearly
application for continuation of this grant. Thus, we request approval to accept this grant each year it is
awarded through 2019 without a new Council resolution.
Information / Background:
In an effort to reduce drunk and impaired driving on our roadways, the State of Minnesota, Department of
Public Safety has developed a grant program designed to fund individual law enforcement agencies for the
hiring, training, and equipping of a DWI Enforcement Officer. The Edina Police Department has been
awarded by the Department of Public Safety, Minnesota State Patrol Division this grant program. The Edina
Police Department has requested and has been approved to receive $198,500.00, in grant funding for the
project year, 2015. This funding shall be used for the acquisition of a vehicle, equipment, training, officer
salary, and expenses incurred relating to the implementation of this grant program. Subsequent grant year
expenses will be paid for by the grantor based on a yearly application and budget request submitted by the
grantee. Yearly budget items will include; officer salary, equipment, training, and operational expenses
relating to the continuation of the DWI grant program. Full implementation of this program is pending
approval and formal resolution by the Edina City Council.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution copy
Grant Agreement
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -31
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AGREEMENT
DWI ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GRANT PROGRAM
Page 2
WHEREAS, the Chief of the Edina Police Department is hereby authorized to execute
such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the
Edina Police Department and to be the fiscal agent and administrator of the grant.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby
declares its commitment to enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of
Public Safety, Minnesota, for the project entitled DWI ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GRANT
PROGRAM.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the DWI ENFORCEMENT OFFICER GRANT
PROGRAM be effective during the period June 1, 2015 through September 30, 2019.
Attest:
�J
Adopted this 7th day of April, 2015
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
James B. Hovland, Mayor
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certifx that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 7 2015, and as recorded
in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015.
0
City Clerk
0
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Chwt Agreement Page 1 of .)
i
Minnesota Department of Public Safety ( "State')
Grant Pro_ram: 2015 National Highway Traffic.
Office of Traffic Safm
Safety Administration (NHTSA): D1171 Officers
445 `vimutesota Street, Suite 150
Saint PauL'Y2; 55101 -5150
Project Number: 15 -03 -19
Grant Aereement Flo.: A-OFFICR15-2415-
EDNAPD-G:1012
Grantee:
Grant _kueement Term:
Edina Police Department
Effective Date: 02:1:15
4501 west 50`' Street
Expiration Date: 9.30.15
Edina MN 55424-1330
Grantee's inthotized Representative:
Gnant Agreement Amount:
Liei tenantTimOlson
Original Agreement S 198.50- 3.00
4501 Rest 56"' Street
Matching Requirement S 0 00
Edina, MN 55424 -1330
Phone: (952) 826 -0490
Email: T0lsomi4 EdinaMN. v
State's Authwized Representative:
Federal Funding: CFDA 20.608 and C rDA 20.61E
Terri Pieper
and CFDA 20.600
445 !v innesota Street, Suite 150
State Funding '_Done
Saint Paul - xvD 55101 -5150
Special Conditions: None
?hone: (651)-')01-7073
Email: terri_ igAatemmus
Under Minn Stat_ § 299A.01, Subd 2 (4) the State is empowered to enter into this grant agreement.
Terris: Effective date is the date shoe above or the date the State obtains all required signature. under l4L:L—
Stat_ 3 16B_98. subd. 7. whiche%w is later. Once this grant agreement is hilly executed, the Grantee may claim,
rei nb�ment for expenditures mcimted pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant agreement.
Reimbursements mill only be made for those eTenditwes made according to the terms of this grant agreement_
Expiration date is the date shown abo-m or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, w•hiche%w occurs
first.
The Grantee, who is not a state employee lvffi:
Perform and accomplish such pauposes and activities as specified herein and in the Grantee's aMo vied 2015
National Highway Traffic Safety Adm mistrat om (N=SA): DWI Offioers Application (` A pphcation') which is
meorpcuated by reference into this grant agreement and on file with the State at445'_1 imnesota Street_ Suitte 150.
Saint Palil— _Vi ' 55101 -5150. The Grandee shall also comply with all requirements referenced in the 2015
National Mdmav Traffic. Safety Adnumstration ,0N=S A): DA'I Officers Chudelines and =_p hration w1nch
includes the Terris and Conditions and Grant ProggramGkudelines httpsJ +'app.dpslnn.gotrEGratlts), which are
incorporated by refie=e into this giant agreement.
Bit dget Reiisroru: The bmakdoam of costs of the Grantee's Budget is contained in Exhibit A- which is attached
and incorporated into this g and agreement_ x s stated is the Grant'ee's Application and Grant Program Guidelines,
the Grantee will subnut a uzitten change request for any substitution of budget items or am deviatyon and in
accordance with the Grant Program Ckuideleaes. Requests must be approved prior to any expenditure liy the
Grantee.
• ltatcirit+g Requirenjews: (H applicable) As stated in the Grantee's Application, the Grandee certifies that the
matching requirement t e met by the Grantee.
DFS tit A&remax am -e •;.;14}
Page 3
0
•
•
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
:,..,
kk Chwt Agreement Page 2 of'
PaYnrew: As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Progam Cnridance, the State S,viU promptly pap the
Cr.�an:ee after the Grantee presents an invoice for the sen-ices actually pe:fcartied and the State's Authoraz-ed
Representatime accepts the invoiced sen-ices and m accordance with the Gran'. Prop —dm Cmidelines. PaNment
ik ll not be made if the Grantee has not satisfied reporting regairenYnt,.
Cer7ificnfaos Regna'ciilig Lobbtvng_ (If applicable_) Grantees recervine federal fimmds crvr $100,000.00 mast
complete and reham the Certification P,emrdmg Lobb)mg foam prmaided brY the State to the Grantee.
1. ENCCblBRAIrCE NT - RMCATION
i. sib<s' yr .6o thr 5osir h c hnm emuva6c rdt
Shed.
Date:
Cract Areemmt No. A- CIFFTCRI 201 5- IDINAPD -0001?
PC) No. 3 -325-54
Z. GR NM
l�rmmrce cern�5cr .char rhr �nF•°r.�P^ are f'e*r�tirs'
hnr emxaiMd ihr gna rr et rcrmrnr m bei�lf clink i �rnvrce
as ,�. tfcm'ok artn-bs, hSzwc nn-..yManr, or carhr�av:cc
Btu
Title:
Date:
BY.
Title:
Date:
DPS Gnm,. - ;e ;:414:;
3. S 4g— CT—NCY
By
(unth delep'ed El: hon :,i
Tile-
Date:
Dum*mb m: DPS,gAS
Grantaa
stag's, P.nhcvv d F-mrcummtrc
Page 4
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
•
Organization: Edina Police Department
2015 DWI Officers
Budget Summary
Page 5
Budget
Budget Category
State Reimbursement
1_o -aal klatch
Equipme -t
Squad Car
531,330,9-
SO.00
3,quad Car Eq. ipmen:
520,335 OC
SO.00
Total
551,665.95
SO.00
3alar -s & Fringe
DWI Court relatec overt me
525,000.00
50.00
CttficerSalary any Benefits
$120,1 P$_D0
S0.00
Total
5145,12$.00
SO.00
'n-Stale Travel
TZC Conference, In -S-a'e -rave
$1,570 DC
50.00
Total
$1,Fa00 DC
SO.00
Other Expenses
Other Expenses
$138.0:
SO.00
Squad Car Maintenance
50.00
50.00
Total
$138.0:
SO.00
ITC-ta'
# 195,500.D0
SO.DO
•
•
To: Mayor and Council
From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Request for Purchase — DWI Enforcement Vehicle
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received:
April 1, 2015
Company:
Nelson Auto Center
Recommended Quote or Bid:
State of MN Project Number: 15 -03 -19
Contract # 83065
�1
• r'�QOaroxP'��� •
issa
Agenda Item #: IV. H.
The Recommended Bid is
Within Budget
❑ Not Within Budget
Bid or Expiration Date:
November 30, 2015
Amount of Quote or Bid:
$30,962.95
General Information:
Working with the Department of Public Safety and a grant from the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, a request to purchase a DWI enforcement vehicle as provided for by the acceptance of DWI
grant awarded by the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
o e' r
o
•
Ott. •
1888
o-
i Item #: IV. I.
Action x❑
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -34 Supporting Application for Hennepin County 2015 Sidewalk
Participation Program
Action Requested:
Adopt the attached resolution.
Information / Background:
The Hennepin County Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2015 Sidewalk Participation Program assists in
• funding to develop and implement effective sidewalk projects that extend the system of sidewalks along
Hennepin County roads, provide pedestrian safety improvements at intersections, provide ADA
compliant facilities, support local plans, and support the implementation of the Hennepin County
Transportation Systems Plan including the Hennepin County Complete Streets Policy. Council and
community support are among the factors considered for the award of funds (County cost participation
is up to 25% to a maximum of $100,000 per project, with construction in 2016). Applications are due to
the County by Apr. 17.
Staff is submitting the application for completing the sidewalk gap on the west side of Xerxes Avenue
South, from W 56th St to W 60th St (this segment is on the City's approved Sidewalk Facilities Map).
This sidewalk is designated as a "high priority" segment on the Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan.
Additionally, Engineering Department staff and the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has
acknowledged the importance of this project; however, due to its relatively high projected cost
(approximately $450,000 - $500,000) it remains unbuilt.
On Mar. 19 staff informed the ETC of its intention to submit an application for this project and received
a favorable response from commissioners.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2015 -34
Xerxes Ave S Sidewalk Project Area Map
G: \PW \INFRAS \AGENCIES \COUNTIES \HENN CTY \2015 Ped -Bike CIP Program \Item IV. I. Resolution No. 2015 -34 Supporting Application for Hennepin County's
2015 Sidewalk Participation Program.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50" St. • Edina, MN 55424
0
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -34
Supporting Application for Hennepin County's 2015 Sidewalk Participation Program
For Sidewalk on Xerxes Avenue South
(on the west side, from West 56th Street to West 60th Street)
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has identified the importance of sidewalk and pedestrian planning through the
Transportation Comprehensive Plan, its Living Streets Policy and approved Sidewalk Facilities Map Comprehensive Plan
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina Transportation Comprehensive Plan identify projects needed to achieve the City's
overall vision for a comprehensive community of non- motorized transportation system; and,
WHEREAS, the construction of safe and convenient pedestrian facilities near schools, commercial areas, parks
and transit stops will provide transportation access to potentially vulnerable users not traveling by vehicle; and,
WHEREAS, the project would include the construction of approximately 2,500 feet of 5 -foot concrete sidewalk
with boulevards to connect to existing sidewalks at W 56th Street and W 60th Street; and
WHEREAS, the construction of this sidewalk segment will enhance the safety conditions of pedestrians, bicyclists
and transit users along this busy collector street; and
WHEREAS, County funds will be used to supplement the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund for these
01projects, leveraging these funds to make the City more walkable.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina endorses the application for funds as administered by
Hennepin County.
Dated: April 7, 2015
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 7, 2015, and as recorded
in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_
0
City Clerk
Project Area
Xerxes Ave Sidewalk N
�'IT4A. Improvement No: S46 W E
o e f Existing Bituminous Sidewalk s
Existing Concrete Sidewalk Engineering Dept
Proposed State -Aid Sidewalk May, 2012
Proposed Concrete Sidewalk
491N��r�
0w e,. VIt
In
1880
To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. J.
From: Debra Mangen Action
City Clerk Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Consider Adoption Of Revised Data Practices Policy
Action Requested:
Adopt revised Data Practices Policy.
Information / Background:
Minnesota Statute Chapter 13 requires each City to establish a Data Practices Policy that explains the rights of
the public to government data and also explains the rights of data subjects. The City originally adopted its Data
Practices Policy in the 1980's and amended it in 1998 and again in 2001. The legislature amends this statute
almost annually with the most recent update that was effective August I, 2014, section 13.05, subd. 5 requiring
cities to create procedures "ensuring that data that are not public are only accessible to persons whose work
assignment reasonably requires access to the data. In order to comply with this provision, staff has revised the
City's Data Practices Policy. The City's legal counsel and staff have reviewed the updated policy and
recommend the City Council adopted the Data Practices Policy.
Attachments:
Data Practices Policy, dated April 7, 2015
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
495/ —�1►.
ow @ CITY OF EDINA •
�y DATA PRACTICES POLICY
v .a
The Data Practices Policy (Policy) contains the procedures and forms adopted by the City of Edina (City) to comply
with the requirements of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, (MGDPA) MN Statutes § 13.01 et seq.
Responsible Authority and Compliance Official. The data practices compliance official is the
designated employee of the government entity to whom persons may direct questions or concerns
regarding problems in obtaining access to data or other data practices issues. The City Council has
appointed Debra Mangen, City Clerk, as the City's Responsible Authority and the Compliance
Official for the Act. The people listed in Appendix A have been appointed as Responsible Authority
Designees to assist in complying with the Act. The phrase "Responsible Authority or a designee"
used in this Policy means the person responding to a MGDPA request for the City.
11. Government Data Generally is Accessible to the Public. "Government Data" means all data
collected, created, received, maintained or disseminated by the City regardless of its physical form,
storage media or conditions of use. Government Data is public data and is generally accessible by
the public according to the terms of the MGDPA, unless it is specifically classified differently by the
MGDPA or other law, and may be subject to a fee. The MGDPA classifies categories of Government
Data that are not generally accessible to the public as follows:
• "Confidential data on individuals" is inaccessible to the public or to the individual
subject of the data.
• "Private data on individuals" is inaccessible to the public, but is accessible to the
individual subject of the data.
• "Protected nonpublic data" is data not on individuals that is inaccessible to the public or
the subject of the data, if any.
• "Nonpublic data" is data not on individuals that is inaccessible to the public, but accessible
to the subject of the data, if any.
111. Access Procedures. Procedures for responding to requests for access to Government Data vary
depending on the classification of the data requested and the person making the request. The
Responsible Authority or a designee must determine:
(1) whether the City maintains the data requested. The City is not required to provide data
it does not maintain or to produce data in a new format.
(2) the statutory category of data requested in order to respond appropriately according to
MGDPA requirements.
Classifications for "not public data" (data classified as private, confidential, or nonpublic data) under Minn. Stat.
§ 13.02, subd. 8a maintained by the City are attached to this Policy as Exhibit D, and responses should follow
the protocol below depending on the category of data.
A. Access to Public Data. All data maintained by the City is public unless there is a specific •
statutory designation which gives it a different classification.
B. People entitled to Access. Any person has the right to inspect and copy public data. The
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 1
person also has the right to have an explanation of the meaning of the data. The person does not
• need to state his or her name, provide identification or give the reason for the request (MS
13.05, subd. 12). To fulfill the request, the representative of the City may ask questions to clarify
the request and may use the form contained in this policy as Exhibit B. The City must determine
whether it maintains the requested data. The City is not required by the Minnesota Government
Data Practices Act to provide data that it does not maintain, nor is the City required to produce
data in a new format.
C. Form of Request. The request for public data may be verbal or written. The City will consult
with its attorney in preparing a response to a request for data relating to litigation.
D. When Must Accessible Data Be Provided? Requests will be received and processed during
normal business hours. If requests cannot be processed or copies cannot be made immediately
at the time of the request, the information must be supplied as soon as reasonably possible.
Standing requests will be valid for one year at which time the request must be renewed by the
party making the request.
E. Fees. Fees may be charged only if the requesting person asks for a copy or electronic
transmittal of the data. The fee may not include time necessary to separate public from non-
public data. Fees may not be charged for inspection of government data.
• Single- Sided, Black and White, Letter or Legal Size Documents
1 -100 pages (MN Statute 13.03, subd. 3 c.) $.25 per page
101 or more pages Actual Cost (as defined below)
• The actual cost of copies includes the cost of searching for and retrieving the data, including
the cost of employee time, and for making, certifying, and electronically transmitting copies
of the data and /or mailing copies of the data and any other production expenses. Actual
costs shall be determined by the department fulfilling the data request
The City may require the requesting party to prepay any fees associated with a request for
copies or transmission.
The Responsible Authority may also charge an additional fee if the copies have commercial
value and are a substantial and discrete portion of a formula, compilation, program, process,
or system developed with significant expenditure of public funds. This additional fee must
relate to the actual development costs of the information.
IV. Access to Data on Individuals. Data about individual people is classified by law as public, private, or
confidential. A list of the private and confidential information maintained by the City is attached as
Exhibit C (Non - public Data Maintained by City). Information to be incorporated on forms used to
collect private and confidential information is also attached as Exhibit D (Tennessen Warning).
A. People Entitled to Access.
1. Public data about an individual may be shown or given to anyone.
2. Private data about an individual may be shown or given to:
• The individual
• • A person who has been given access by the express written consent of the data subject.
This consent must be on the form attached as Exhibit E, or a form reasonably similar.
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 2
• People who are authorized access by federal, state, or local law or court order.
People about whom the individual was advised at the time the data was collected. The •
identity of those people must be part of the Tennessen Warning.
• People within the City staff, the City Council, and outside agents (such as attorneys)
whose work assignments or responsibilities reasonably require access.
3. Confidential and Protected nonpublic information may not be given to the
subject of the data, but may be shown or given to:
• People who are authorized access by federal, state or local law or court order and
whose identity is disclosed in the Tennessen Warning.
• People within the City staff, the City Council, and outside agents (such as attorneys)
whose work assignments or responsibilities reasonably require access.
B. Form of Request. Any individual may request verbally or in writing whether the
City has stored data about that individual and whether the data is classified as
public, private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic.
All requests to see or copy private nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic information
must be in writing. An information disclosure request, attached as Exhibit F, must be completed
to document who requests and who receives this information. The Responsible Authority or
Designee must complete the relevant portions of the form. The Responsible Authority or
Designee may waive the use of this form if there is other documentation of the requesting
party's identity, the data requested, and the City's response. A response to a request for data •
relating to litigation will be made after consultation with the City Attorney.
C. Identification of Requesting Party. The Responsible Authority or Designee must verify the
identity of the requesting party as a person entitled to access. This can be done through
personal knowledge, presentation of written identification, comparison of the data subject's
signature on a consent form with the person's signature in City records, or other reasonable
means.
D. Time Limits. Requests will be received and processed during normal business hours. The
response must be immediate, if possible, or within 10 working days if an immediate response is
not possible (M.S. 13.04 subd. 3).
E. Fees. Fees may be charged in the same manner as for public information.
F. Summary Data. Summary data means statistical records and reports derived from data on
individuals but which does not identify an individual by name or any other private, nonpublic,
confidential or protected nonpublic data. Summary data is public. The Responsible Authority or
Designee will prepare summary data upon request, if the request is in writing and the
requesting party pays a deposit for the cost of preparation in advance. The Responsible
Authority or Designee must notify the requester of the anticipated time schedule and the
reasons for the delay.
Summary data may be prepared by redacting (blacking out) personal identifiers, cutting out
portions of the records that contain personal identifiers, programming computers to delete
personal identifiers, or other reasonable means.
The Responsible Authority may authorize an outside agency or person to prepare the summary
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 3
data if (1) the specific purpose is given in writing, (2) the agency or person agrees not to
Is disclose the private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic data, and (3) the
Responsible Authority determines that access by this outside agency or person will not
compromise the privacy of the private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic data. The
Responsible Authority may use the form attached as Exhibit F.
G. juvenile Records. The following applies to private (not confidential) data about people under
the age of 18.
1. Notice to juvenile Subject Of Data. Before requesting private data from juveniles, City
personnel must notify the juveniles subjects that they may request that their private data be
withheld from their parent(s) or legal guardians, stating reasons for the request. This notice
should be in the form attached as Exhibit H and must be given in addition to a Tennessen
Warning.
2. Parental Access. In addition to the people listed above who may have access to private
data, a parent may have access to private information about a juvenile subject. "Parent"
means the parent or legal guardian of a juvenile data subject, or individual acting as a parent
or legal guardian in the absence of a parent or legal guardian. The parent is presumed to
have this right unless the Responsible Authority or designee has been given evidence that
there is a state law, court order, or other legally binding document which prohibits this
right.
3. Denial of Parental Access. The Responsible Authority or Designee may deny parental
access to private data when the juvenile requests this denial and the Responsible Authority
• or Designee determines that withholding the data would be in the best interest of the
juvenile. The request from the juvenile must be in writing stating the reasons for the
request. In determining the best interest of the juvenile, the Responsible Authority or
Designee will consider:
• Whether the juvenile is of sufficient age and maturity to explain the reasons and
understand the consequences;
• Whether denying access may protect the juvenile from physical or emotional harm;
• Whether there is reasonable grounds to support the juvenile's reasons; and
• Whether the data concerns medical, dental, or other health services provided under
Minnesota Statutes Sections 144.341 to 144.347. If so, the data may be released only if
failure to inform the parent would seriously jeopardize the health of the minor.
• The Responsible Authority or Designee may also deny parental access without a request
from the juvenile under Minnesota Statutes Section 144.335.
V. Denial of Access. If the Responsible Authority or Designee determines that the requested data of
whatever classification is not accessible to the requesting party, the Responsible Authority or
Designee must inform the requesting party orally at the time of the request or in writing as soon
after that as possible. A denial must be given in writing, including the specific legal authority for the
denial upon request of the party requesting data.
VI. Collection of Data on Individuals. The collection and storage of information about individuals will
be limited to that necessary for the administration and management of programs specifically
authorized by the state legislature, city council, or federal government.
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 4
When an individual is asked to supply private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic
information about himself or herself, the City employee requesting the information must give the •
individual a Tennessen warning. This warning must contain the following:
I. the purpose and intended use of the requested data;
2. whether the individual may refuse or is legally required to supply the requested data;
3. any known consequences from supplying or refusing to supply the information; and
4. the identity of other persons or entities authorized by state or federal law to receive the
data.
A Tennessen warning is not required when an individual is requested to supply investigative data to a
law enforcement officer.
A Tennessen warning may be on a separate form or may be incorporated into the form which
requests the private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic data. In certain situations, a
victim and /or witness to a crime may request that their identity be withheld from the public.
VI. Collection of Data on Individuals. The collection and storage of information about individuals will
be limited to that necessary for the administration and management of programs specifically
authorized by the state legislature, city council, or federal government.
VII. Challenge to Data Accuracy. An individual who is the subject of public or private data may contest
the accuracy or completeness of that data maintained by the City. The individual must notify the
City's Responsible Authority in writing describing the nature of the disagreement. Within 30 days,
the Responsible Authority or Designee must respond and either (1) correct the data found to be •
inaccurate or incomplete and attempt to notify past recipients of inaccurate or incomplete data,
including recipients named by the individual, or (2) notify the individual that the Authority believes
the data to be correct.
An individual who is dissatisfied with the Responsible Authority's action may appeal to the
Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Administration, using the contested case procedures
under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 14. The Responsible Authority will correct any data if so ordered
by the Commissioner.
Vlll. Data Accuracy and Security Safeguards
A. Accuracy of Data. In order that Government Data be kept in the most accurate and current
state practicable, the following guidelines should be followed:
I. All employees will be requested to provide updated personal information to the appropriate
supervisor and Human Resources. The information is necessary for tax purposes, insurance
coverage, emergency notifications, and other personnel purposes.
2. Other people who provide private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic
information will also be encouraged to provide updated information when appropriate.
3. Department directors and division managers should periodically review forms used to collect
data on individuals to delete items that are not necessary and to clarify items that may be
ambiguous. •
B. Challenges to Data Accuracy. An individual who is the subject of Government Data may
contest the accuracy or completeness of that data by notifying the Responsible Authority in
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 5
writing describing the nature of the disagreement. Within thirty days, the Responsible Authority
. or designee must review the data in question and respond by either (i) correcting data found to
be inaccurate or incomplete and attempting to notify past recipients of the inaccurate or
incomplete data, including recipients named by the individual; or (ii) notifying the individual that
the Responsible Authority believes the data to be accurate. An individual who is dissatisfied with
the Responsible Authority's response may appeal the matter to the Commissioner of the
Department of Administration, utilizing the contested case procedures in Minn. Stat. Chap. 14.
C. Data Security
1. City Staff must pay careful attention to and abide by the City's Records Retention Schedule,
disposing of records as appropriate.
2. Private, nonpublic, and confidential data must be stored in secure files or databases which
are not accessible to unauthorized personnel pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13.05, subd. 5 The
Responsible Authority or a designee should instruct authorized personnel to (1) not discuss,
disclose or otherwise release private, nonpublic, or confidential data to personnel who are
not authorized to access such data; (2) protect access to private, nonpublic, or confidential
data in their possession; (3) shred private, nonpublic, or confidential data prior to discarding
it or dispose of it in confidential locked recycling. The City conducts ongoing security
checks and must complete, at least annually, a comprehensive assessment of security of the
Private, Nonpublic, and Confidential Data maintained.
3. Private, nonpublic, and confidential data should be kept within City offices at all times unless
necessary for off - premises City business.
• 4. Only those employees whose job responsibilities require them to have access will be allowed
access to files and records that contain private and confidential information. These
employees will be instructed to:
• not discuss, disclose or otherwise release private, nonpublic, confidential or protected
nonpublic data to City employees whose job responsibilities do not require access to
the data;
• not leave private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic data where non -
authorized individuals might see it; and
• shred private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic data before discarding, or
dispose through confidential locked recycling.
• When a contract with an outside party requires access to private, nonpublic, confidential
or protected nonpublic information, the contracting party will be required to use and
disseminate the information consistent with the Act. The City may include in a written
contract the language contained in Exhibit I.
D. Trade Secret and Security Information. Trade Secret and Security Information (e.g. plans
for alarm systems, vaults, sprinkler systems, security protocols) is Nonpublic Data. The
Responsible Authority, in consultation with legal counsel as necessary, will determine whether
particular information qualifies as Trade Secret or Security Information according to the
• following definitions:
I. "Trade Secret information" is government data that includes a formula, pattern,
compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process that is (1) supplied by an
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 6
individual or organization; (2) subject to efforts by the individual or organization to
maintain secrecy of the information; and (3) derives independent actual or potential •
economic value by not being known to or accessible to the public through lawful means.
2. "Security information" is government data the disclosure of which would be likely to
substantially jeopardize the security of the information, possessions, individuals or
property against theft, tampering, improper use, attempted escape, illegal disclosure,
trespass, or physical injury. Security information includes crime prevention block maps
and lists of volunteers who participate in community crime prevention programs and
their home addresses and telephone numbers.
E. Contracts with Private Entities. If the City enters into a contract with a private person to
perform any of the City's functions, all of the data created, collected, received, stored, used,
maintained, or disseminated by such private person in performing those functions is subject to
the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 13.01 et seq. and such person must comply with the
requirements as if he or she were a government entity. All such contracts must include a notice
that the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 13.01 et seq. apply to the contract. See Exhibit I.
F. Procedures in the Event of Unauthorized Access. This Policy establishes that only those
personnel who need to access Nonpublic Data do so. In the event of a breach of that
requirement, the City is required to notify any individual or entity whose Nonpublic Data was
wrongfully accessed, to conduct an investigation into the matter, and to prepare a report.
Notification must occur in the most expedient time frame possible and must inform the
individual or individuals how they can obtain a copy of the report. If the breach involves
unauthorized access by an employee, contractor, or agent of the government entity, the report •
must include at least (i) the description of the type of data accessed (ii) the number of individuals
affected; (iii) final disposition of disciplinary action against any employee determined to be
responsible for the breach. See Minn. Stat. § 13.055.
•
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 7
•
IX. FORMS AN[
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Exhibit G
Exhibit H
Exhibit I
1 RESOURCES
List of Designees
Request For Public Data Request Form
Classified Data Access Request
Govern Data Classified As Not Public (Private, Nonpublic, Confidential or Protected
Nonpublic) Maintained
Data Practices Advisory (Tennessen Warning)
Consent To Release Private Data
Government Data Access And Nondisclosure Agreement
Notice To Persons Under The Age Of 18
Sample Contract Provision For Contracts With Outside Entities Accessing Private,
Nonpublic, Confidential or Protected Nonpublic Data
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 8
A, e. 0
a� E 'r �vt,4 EXHIBIT A
m
y LIST OF DESIGNEES
J .S
The following persons are officially designated by the Responsible Authority as "Designees" to be in charge of
individual files or systems containing government data and to receive and comply with the requests for government
data.
The following persons are officially designated by the Responsible Authority as "Designees" to be in charge of
individual files or systems containing government data and to receive and comply with the requests for government
data.
Scott Neal
David Fischer
Heather Branigan
Judy Laufenburger
Karen Kurt
Jackie Onichuk
MJ Lamon
Jane Timm
Brian Olson
Cassi McMayer
Ann Kattreh
Bob Wilson
Joel Abood
Mitzi Wicklund
Janet Canton
Susan Faus
Jennifer Bennerotte
Michael Frey •
Kaylin Eidness
Patty McGrath
Ryan Browning
Susie Miller
Tom Shirley
Chad Millner
Amy Smith
Sharon Allison
Donna Tilsner
Eric Roggeman
Cary Teague
Kyle Sawyer
Jackie Hoogenaaker
Cindy Larsen
Lisa Schaefer
Carri Person
Brian Olson
Cassi McMayer
Marge Bergman
Jessica Nikunen
Dave Goergen
Terri Wilson
Dave Nelson
Tom Schmitz
Lynn Olson
Karen Bredesen
Ruth Schmoll
Jeff Brown
Solvei Wilmot
0
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 19
w9sNA, EXHIBIT B
o @, CITY OF EDINA
/y REQUEST FOR PUBLIC DATA
MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA
PRACTICES ACT
REQUESTER: Complete this form and return it to Edina City Hall. You may submit it via e-mail at
dmangen(&EdinaMN.gov in person or by U.S. Mail.
You do not have to provide contact information. However, if you want us to mail you copies of data, we will need some type of
contact information. In addition, if we do not understand your request and need to get clarification from you, without contact
information we will not be able to begin processing your request until you contact us.
The City of Edina will respond to you as soon as reasonably possible.
NOTICE: You may cancel this request at any time prior to the release of information.
You may be required to pay the actual costs of making copies.
Last Name First Name Phone Date
Street Address City State Zip Email
Information Requested (Be as specific as possible):
•
•
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY - Requester, please do not write below this line.
Department
Handled by:
Request Type: ❑ In- person, ❑ Mail ❑ Phone ❑ E -mail
Fees Charged:
If no fee is charged enter "None"
City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 952 - 927 -8861, Fax 952 - 826 -0390
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 10
wgir, EXHIBIT C
g CLASSIFIED DATA
y
ACCESS REQUEST
J .a
.e7I-.-s GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT
REQUESTER: Complete this form and return it to Edina City Hall.
NOTICE You may cancel this request at any time prior to the release of
information. In any event, this consent form will expire 90 days after signing.
After being shown private data on individuals and informed of its meaning,
this data need not be disclosed again for six months unless additional
information has been collected or an action is pending.
You may be required to pay the actual costs of making and /or compiling
data.
NOTE The subject of the data request must authorize the release of
private information to the subject's agent or another agency. An "Informed
Consent to Release" must be completed by the subject of the data.
Name: Last First M.I. Date
Address: Street City State Zip Phone No.
Information Requested
Requester's Signature: If not the subject of the data requested, see note above. •
DEPARTMENT USE ONLY - Please do not write below this line.
NOTE Reasonable identification must be obtained from the person seeking NOTE If Data Subject is a minor, consult Attorney prior to release of
the information. information.
Department Handled by:
Identification Viewed (Drivers License, State ID, Notarized Request)
Requester is: Data Subject; Not Data Subject, See NOTE above
Request Type: In- person, _Mail
Data Classification: _Public— —Non-Public, Protected Non - Public, _Private, Confidential
Request Approved or _Denied Authorized
Comments: Enter any appropriate remarks or comments. If data access is denied, cite authority or reason.
Fees Charged (If no fee is charged enter "None'):
City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 952 927 -8861, Fax 952 826 -0390 is
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 11
w9SiA, EXHIBIT D
o e ° ` CITY OF EDINA
RESOURCE LIST
°•,,,a,,r� NON - PUBLIC DATA MAINTAINED
BY THE CITY OF EDINA
I. Personnel Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.43
All data about an individual who is employed as, or an applicant to be, an undercover law officer is private *.
All data on all other individuals who are or were an employee, an applicant for employment, volunteer,
independent contractor, except the following which is public:
PUBLIC DATA
• Name
• Actual gross salary
• Salary range
• Contract fees
• Actual gross pension
• Value and nature of employer paid fringe benefits
• Basis for and amount of added remuneration, including expense reimbursement
• Bargaining unit
• Job title
• Job description
• Education and training background
• Previous work experience
• Date of first and last employment
• The existence and status (but not nature) of any complaints or charges against the employee,
whether or not resulting in discipline
• Final disposition of any disciplinary action, with specific reasons for the action and data documenting
the basis of the action, excluding data that would identify confidential sources who are employees
• Terms of any agreement settling any dispute arising from the employment relationship, including a
"buyout" agreement
• Work location
• Work telephone number
• Badge number
• Honors and awards received
• Payroll time sheets or other comparable data that are only used to account for employee's work
time for payroll purposes, except to the extent that release of time sheet data would reveal the
employee's reasons for the use of medical leave or other not public data
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 12
• Employee Identification Number (not a social security number)
• If it is necessary to protect an employee from harm to self or to protect another person who may
be harmed by the employee, information that is relevant to the safety concerns may be released to
(1) the person who may be harmed or to the person's attorney when relevant to obtaining a
restraining order, (2) a pre - petition screening team in the commitment process, or (3) a court, law
enforcement agency or prosecuting agency.
* Undercover Law Enforcement Officer Data (Private — MN Statute § 13.43, subd. 5) All data about an
individual who is employed as, or is an applicant to be, an undercover law officer is Private Data on
Individuals. When the individual is no longer assigned to an undercover position, the data is Personnel
Data unless the law enforcement agency determines that revealing the data would threaten the personal
safety of the officer or jeopardize an active investigation.
2. Applicant Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.43, subd. 3
Data about current and former applicants for City employment is Private Data on Individuals except the
following, which is public:
Public Data:
• Veteran status
• Relevant test scores
• Rank on eligible list
• Job history
• Education and training
• Work availability
• Name, after being certified as eligible for appointment to a vacancy or when considered a finalist for
a position of public employment (which occurs when the person has been selected to be
interviewed by the appointing authority)
3. Applicants for Appointment. (MN Statutes 13.601, subd. 3.) Data about applicants for appointment to a
public body collected by a government entity as a result of the applicant's application for appointment to the
public body are Private Data on Individuals except that the following are public: name; city of residence,
except when the appointment has a residency requirement that requires the entire address to be public;
education and training; employment history; volunteer work; awards and honors; prior government service;
• Once an individual is appointed to a public body, the following additional data are public: residential
address and either a telephone number or e-mail address where the appointee can be reached, or
both at the request of the appointee.
• An e -mail address or telephone number provided by a public body for use by an appointee shall be
public. An appointee may use an e-mail address or telephone number provided by the public body
as the designated e-mail address or telephone number at which the appointee can be reached.
4. Real Property Complaint Data (Confidential) MN Stat. 13.44
The identities of individuals who register complaints concerning violations of state laws or local ordinances
concerning the use of real property is Confidential Data on Individuals.
5. Security Information (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.37
Data which if disclosed would be likely to substantially jeopardize the security of information, possessions,
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 13
individuals or property against theft, tampering, improper use, attempted escape, illegal disclosure, trespass,
or physical injury. This includes crime prevention block maps and lists of volunteers who participate in
community crime prevention programs and their home addresses and telephone numbers, but these may
be disseminated to other volunteers participating in crime prevention programs. This also includes interior
sketches, photos, or plans of buildings where detailed information about alarm systems or similar issues
could jeopardize security.
• The location of a National Night Out event is Public Data.
6. Trade Secret Information (Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.37, subd. I (b)
The Responsible Authority, in consultation with legal counsel as necessary, will determine whether
particular information qualifies as Trade Secret according to the following definition:
• "Trade Secret information" is government data that includes a formula, pattern, compilation,
program, device, method, technique, or process that is (1) supplied by an individual or organization;
(2) subject to efforts by the individual or organization to maintain secrecy of the information; and
(3) derives independent actual or potential economic value by not being known to or accessible to
the public through lawful means.
7. Registered Voter Lists MN Stat. 13.37, 203B.12, Absentee Ballots (Private /Protected Nonpublic)
201.091
• Sealed absentee ballots before opening by an election judge are Protected Nonpublic. Names of
voters submitting absentee ballots are Private until the close of voting.
• Registered voter lists are private, except for use related to elections, political activities, or law
enforcement. The date of birth, portion of a Social Security number, driver's license number or
other identification card number on voter lists cannot be provided on a list available for public
inspection.
8. Bids, Proposals, Sealed Bids (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.37, subd. 2; 13.591
• Sealed bids, including the number of bids received, prior to opening are Nonpublic Data.
• Proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposals are Private or Nonpublic Data until the
responses are opened. Once opened, the name becomes Public, but all other data remain Private or
Nonpublic until completion of the selection process. After the process is completed, all remaining
data are Public with the exception of trade secret data.
• Data submitted by a business in response to a Request for Bids are Private or Nonpublic Data until
the bids are opened. Once opened, the name of the bidder and the dollar amount specified in the
response become Public Data. All other data in a bidder's response to a bid are Private or
Nonpublic data until the completion of the selection process. After the process is completed, all
remaining data are Public with the exception of trade secret data.
• In the event that all responses to a Request for Proposals or a Request for Bids are rejected,
information that was Private or Nonpublic remains that way until a re- solicitation of bids results in
completion of the selection process or the process is abandoned. If re- solicitation does not occur
within one year, the remaining data become Public.
9. Labor Relations Information (Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.37, subd. I (c) Protected Nonpublic)
• Management positions on economic and non - economic items that have not been presented during
the collective bargaining process or interest arbitration, including information collected or created
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 14
to prepare the management position are Nonpublic or Protected Nonpublic Data.
10. Firearms Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.87, subd. 2
• Data about the purchase or transfer of firearms and applications for permits to carry firearms.
11. Examination Data (Private or Confidential) MN Stat. 13.34
• Completed versions of personnel and licensing examinations are Private Data, unless the
Responsible Authority determines that they should be confidential because access would
compromise the objectivity, fairness, or integrity of the examination process.
12. Elected Officials Correspondence (Private) MN Stat. 13.601
• Correspondence between individuals and elected officials is Private Data, but may be made Public
Data by either the author or any recipient.
13. HRA Data ( Non - Public /Private /Confidential) MN Stat. 13.585, 13.462, 13.59
• Housing agency data, data about individuals participating in the City's housing rehabilitation
program, Section 8 rental assistance program, and other housing assistance programs, data relating
to businesses receiving financial assistance are either Non - Public or Private.
• Data pertaining to negotiations with property owners regarding the purchase of the property are
Nonpublic Data. Except the HRA's evaluation of properties that it does not purchase, all other
negotiation data becomes Public Data at the time of the closing of the property sale.
• Data pertaining to individuals' income collected for purposes of determining eligibility of property
for classification 4d under Minn. Stat. §§ 273.128 and 273.13 is Private Data on Individuals. Such data
may be disclosed to county and local assessors responsible for determining eligibility of property for
classification 4d.
• Law enforcement access to data may be subject to different regulation.
14. Federal Contracts Data (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.35
• To the extent that a federal agency requires it as a condition for contracting with a City, all
government data collected and maintained by the City is classified as private or nonpublic.
15. Civil Investigative Data (Confidential /Private) MN Stat. 13.39
• Data collected as part of an active investigation undertaken to commence or defend pending civil
litigation, or which are retained in anticipation of pending civil litigation is confidential, except that a
complainant's statement is private.
16. Appraisal Data (Confidential /Protected Nonpublic/ MN Stat. 13.44 subd. 3 Public)
• Data on estimated or appraised values of real property made by or on behalf of the City for the
purpose of selling or acquiring real property are Confidential or Protected Nonpublic Data.
Appraised values of real property obtained by owners who have received from the City an offer to
purchase property are Private or Nonpublic Data. All such data become Public Data when (1)
submitted to a court - appointed condemnation commissioner; (2) submitted in court during
condemnation proceedings; or (3) the parties enter into an agreement for the purchase and sale of
the real property.
17. Assessor's Data (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.51, 375.192, 272.1 15, 273.124
• Data on sale sheets from private MLS organizations where the contract with the organization
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 15
requires that the data not be made available to the public is Private Data.
. • The following income property data is Private Data or Nonpublic Data: (a) detailed income and
expense figures; (b) average vacancy factors; (c) verified net rentable areas or net usable areas,
whichever is appropriate; (d) anticipated income and expenses; (e) projected vacancy forms; and (f)
lease information.
Income information on individuals collected for purposes of determining eligibility of property under
class 4d (Minn. Stat. §§ 273.128 and 273.13) are Private Data.
• Social Security Nos. and Federal Employer Identification Nos. on Certificates of Value, homestead
applications, and other documents is Private Data.
18. Transportation Service Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.72
• Personal, medical, financial, familial or locational information, except the name, of applicants or
users of transportation services for the disabled or elderly is Private Data.
19. Social Recreation Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.548
• The name, address, telephone number, any other data that identifies the individual, and any data
which describes the health or medical condition of the individual, family relationships, living
arrangements, and opinions as to the emotional makeup or behavior of individuals enrolling in
recreational or social programs are Private Data.
20. Law Enforcement and Investigative Data (Confidential /Protected Nonpublic/ Private) MN Stat.
13.80, 13.82, 13.85, 13.87, 169.09, 168.10, 169A.70, 171.043, 171.07, 171.071, 171.12, 171.32, 299A.61,
299C.065, 299C.091, 299C.093, 299C.095, 299C.46, 299C.48, 299C.53, 299C.56, 61 1.272, 626.53, 609.324,
• 609.3452, 609.3471, 626.556, 626.5563, 626.557, 626.558, 626.5593, 626.89, 629.341, 260B.171, 260B.198,
260B.235, 299C.68, 299F.035, 299F.04, 299F.05, 299F.054, 299F.055, 299F.056, 299F.095, 299F.096
• Data collected under Minn. Stat. § 5 1813.0 1 (Domestic Abuse Act) are Confidential until a temporary
court order is executed or served on the respondent in the action.
• Audio recordings of 911 calls are Private Data on Individuals with respect to the individual making
the call, but a written transcript of the call is Public provided it does not reveal the identity of an
individual subject to protection under Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 17 (e.g. undercover law
enforcement officer, victim of criminal sexual conduct, other crime victim or witness requesting
anonymity).
• Criminal investigative data during an active investigation is confidential or protected nonpublic. Data
on inactive investigations, unless the release of the data would jeopardize an ongoing investigation
or reveal the identity of an individual subject to protection under Minn. Stat. § 13.82, subd. 17, is
public —with the exception of photographs that are clearly offensive to common sensibilities, which
are private or nonpublic data, provided the existence of the photographs is disclosed to individuals
requesting the inactive investigation file. An investigation is "inactive" when an agency or
prosecuting authority decides not to pursue a case, when the statute of limitations (or thirty years
after the offense, whichever comes first) expires, or upon the exhaustion of appeal rights of a
person convicted on the basis of the investigative data.
• A law enforcement agency can make investigative data public to aid law enforcement, promote
public safety, or dispel unrest. Written requests to access data by victims of crimes or alleged
crimes must be granted unless the authority reasonably believes that release of data will interfere
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 16
with an investigation or the request is prompted by a desire by the requester to engage in unlawful
behavior. 0
• Investigations involving reports of child abuse or neglect or maltreatment of a vulnerable adult,
either active or inactive, are Private Data on Individuals in cases where the alleged victim is
identified. The identity of the reporter of child abuse or neglect is Confidential, unless compelled by
law. The identity of the reporter of maltreatment of a vulnerable adult is Private Data on Individuals.
• Data on court records relating to name changes is Confidential during an active investigation and
Private Data on Individuals when an investigation is inactive.
• Data that uniquely describes stolen, lost, confiscated, or recovered property are Private Data or
Nonpublic Data.
• Data that identifies customers of pawn shops, scrap metal dealers, or secondhand stores are Private
Data on Individuals.
• Deliberative process data or data revealing investigative techniques are Confidential.
• Data presented as evidence in court is public.
• Arrest data (including booking photographs), requests for service data, and response or incident
data is public. Details of arrest previous to charges being filed by prosecutor are private
21. Human Rights Data (Confidential/ Private) MN Stat. 13.552, 363A
• Human rights investigative data are Confidential. The name and address of a charging party and
respondent, factual basis of the allegations, and the statute under which the action is brought are
Private Data on Individuals.
22. Planning Survey Data (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.59
The following data collected in surveys of individuals conducted by the City for the purpose of planning,
development and redevelopment are classified as private or nonpublic:
• names and addresses of individuals, and
• the legal descriptions of property owned by the individuals, and
• the commercial use of the property to the extent disclosure of the use would identify a particular
business.
23. City Attorney Records (Confidential) MN Stat. 13.393
The use, collection, storage, and dissemination of data by the city attorney is governed by statutes, rules,
and professional standards concerning discovery, production of documents, introduction of evidence, and
professional responsibility.
• Data which is the subject of attorney - client privilege is Confidential. Data which is the subject of the
"work product" privilege is Confidential.
24. Business Data (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.591
The following data submitted by a business requesting financial assistance, a license, or other benefit are
Private or Nonpublic:
Is
• Financial information about the business, including credit reports, financial statements, net worth
calculations, business plans, income and expense projections, balance sheets, customer lists, income 40
tax returns, and design, market, and feasibility studies not paid for with public funds.
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 17
This data becomes public when assistance, a license, or other benefits are granted, except the following,
• which remain Private or Nonpublic:
• Business plans; income and expense projections not related to the financial assistance provided;
customer lists; income tax returns; and design, market, and feasibility studies not paid for with
public funds.
25. Municipal Obligation Register Data MN Stat. 475.55 (Private /Nonpublic)
• Information with respect to the ownership of municipal obligations is Private or Nonpublic.
26. Hazardous Materials (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 145.94
• Data relating to exposure to hazardous substances is Private or Nonpublic.
27. Auditing Data (Nonpublic /Protected Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.392
• Data, notes, and preliminary drafts of audit reports are confidential or protected nonpublic until the
final report is published.
28. Salary Benefit Survey Data (Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.435
• Salary and personnel benefit data purchased from consulting firms is nonpublic.
29. Social Security Numbers (Private) MN Stat. 13.355
• SSNs collected in whole or in part are Private Data On Inviduals.
30. Public Employees Retirement Association Data MN Stat. 13.63 (Private)
The home address, date of birth, direct deposit account number, and tax withholding data of individual
beneficiaries and survivors of members are Private Data on Individuals.
31. Electronic Payments, Credit Card Numbers, MN Stat. 13.37; 13.6401 Bank Account
Numbers (Nonpublic)
Information that would substantially jeopardize the security of information, possessions, or individuals or
property against theft, tampering, improper use, attempted escape, illegal disclosure, trespass, or physical
injury is Private or Nonpublic.
32. Drug and Alcohol Test Results (Private) MN Stat. 181.954; 49 CFR 382.405
With respect to public sector employees and job applicants, the results of drug or alcohol tests are Private
Data on Individuals.
33. Data On Rentals (Private /Nonpublic) MN Stat. 13.55
The following data relating to convention rentals are classified as Private and Nonpublic: Letter or other
documentation from any person who makes inquiry to or who is contacted by the facility regarding the
availability of the facility for staging events, identity of firms and corporations which contact the facility, type
of event which they wish to stage in the facility, suggested terms of rentals, and responses of authority staff
to these inquiries, exhibitor data. All rental data is Public information when certain conditions are met.
34. Group Auto Self- Insurance Claims Data Minn. Stat. § 471.617 (Private /Nonpublic)
Claims data, either as to single claims or total claims of an individual, is Private or Nonpublic Data, except
that it may be disclosed to authorized personnel of the City in order to administer a health benefit
program.
Is 35. Welfare (Private) MN Stat. 13.46
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 18
Generally, welfare data (expect summary data) is Private Data. The welfare data section of the MGDPA,
however, has numerous exceptions and special treatment for particular data types and applications. •
Contact the City attorney for requests involving welfare data.
36. Benefit Data (Private) MN Stat. 13.462 Data on individuals seeking information about becoming an
applicant for or a recipient of benefits or services provided, or that is or was an applicant or recipient of
such benefits or services, under various housing, home ownership, rehabilitation and community action
agency, Head Start, and food assistance programs administered by government entities, with the exception
of names and addresses, is Private Data.
37. Safe At Home Participant (Private) Minn. Stat. § 13.045 Identity and location data on a program
participant that are not otherwise classified by law are private data on individuals.
38. Domestic Abuse Data (Confidential) Minn. Stat. § 13.80 Data on individuals collected, created, received
or maintained by the police department pursuant to the Domestic Abuse Act, section 51813.01, are classified
as confidential data, pursuant to section 13.02, subdivision 3, until a temporary court order made pursuant
to subdivision 5 or 7 of section 5 1813.0 1 is executed or served upon the data subject who is the respondent
to the action.
39. Personal Contact And Online Account Information (Private) Minn. Stat. § 13.356, Data on an
individual collected, maintained, or received for notification purposes or as part of a subscription list for
electronic periodic publications as requested by the individual are private data on individuals: (I) telephone
number; (2) e-mail address; and (3) Internet user name, password, Internet protocol address, and any other
similar data related to the individual's online account or access procedures.
•
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 19
• w9:V A, I EXHIBIT E
o
et- CITY OF EDINA DATA PRACTICES ADVISORY
(TENNESSEN WARNING)
Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on the attached form is classified by state law as
either private, nonpublic, confidential or protected nonpublic. Private data is information which generally cannot
be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally
cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data.
Our purpose and intended use of this information is:
You ❑ are / ❑ are not legally required to provide this information.
If you refuse to supply the information, the following may happen:
0 Other persons or entities who are authorized by law to receive this information are:
0
Your signature on this form indicates that you understand this advisory.
Signature
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 20
91�Ar EXHIBIT F •
o @ CITY OF EDINA
0 CONSENT TO RELEASE PRIVATE DATA
authorize the City of Edina ( "City ") to release the
(print name)
following private data about me:
to the following person or people:
The person or people receiving the private data may use it only for the following purpose or purposes:
This authorization is dated and expires on
The expiration cannot exceed one year from the date of the authorization, except in the case of authorizations given in connection with applications for life insurance or
non - cancelable or guaranteed renewable health insurance and identified as such, two years after the date of the policy.
I agree to give up and waive all claims that I might have against the City, its agents and employees for releasing data
pursuant to this request.
Print Name
Signature
Identification must be verified by driver's license, state ID, passport, or other valid identification.
On this day of I personally appeared before me; whose identity I proved on the basis of
satisfactory evidence to be the signer of the above instrument, and he /she acknowledged that he /she executed it.
Notary Public •
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 21
ry91 A. EXHIBIT G
CIT OF EDINA
>y GOVERNMENT DATA ACCESS
� a
AND NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
I . AUTHORIZATION. City of Edina ( "City ") hereby authorized
, ( "Authorized Party ") access to the following government data:
2. PURPOSE. Access to this government data is limited to the objective of creating summary data for the
following purposes:
3. COST. (Check which applies)
❑ The Authorized Party is the person who requested the summary data and agrees to bear the City's cost
associated with the preparation of the data which has been determined to be $
❑ The Authorized Party has been requested by the City to prepare summary data and will be paid a reasonable
fee.
4. SECURITY. The Authorized Party agrees that it and any employees or agents under its control must
protect the privacy interest of individual data subjects in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
The Authorized Party agrees to remove all unique personal identifiers which could be used to identify any
individual from data classified by state or federal law as non - public which is obtained from City records and
incorporated into reports, summaries, compilations, articles or any document or series of documents. Data
contained in files, records, or other storage media maintained by the City are the City's property and are not to
leave the City's custody. The Authorized Party agrees not to make reproductions of any data or to remove any
data from the site where it is provided, if the data can in any way identify an individual.
No data which are not public and which are irrelevant to the purpose state above will ever be disclosed or
communicated to anyone by any means.
The Authorized Party warrants that the following named individual(s) will be the only person(s) to participate in
the collection of the data described above:
S. LIABILITY FOR DISCLOSURE. The Authorized Party is liable for any unlawful use or disclosure of
government data collection, used and maintained in the exercise of this Agreement and classified as not public
under state or federal law. The Authorized Party understands that it may be subject to civil or criminal penalties
under those laws.
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 22
The Authorized Party agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the city, its officers and employees harmless from any
liability, claims, damages, costs, judgments, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or
indirectly from an act or omission of the Authorized Party, its agents, employees or assignees under this
agreement and against all loss by reason of the Authorized Party's failure to fully perform in any respect all
obligations under this Agreement.
6. INSURANCE. In order to protect itself as well as the City, the Authorized Party agrees at all times during
the term of the Agreement to maintain insurance covering the Authorized Party's activities under this Agreement.
The insurance will cover $1,000,000 per claimant for personal injuries and /or damages and $1,000,000 per
occurrence. The policy must cover the indemnification obligation specified above.
7. ACCESS PERIOD. The Authorized Party may have access to the information described above from _
to
8. SUMMARY DATA RESULTS. (Check which applies):
❑ If the Authorized Party is the requester, a copy of all reports, summaries, compilations, articles, publications
or any document or series of documents which are created from the information provided under this
Agreement must be made available to the city in its entirety.
❑ If the Authorized Party is a contractor of the City, all copies of reports, summaries, compilations, articles,
publication or any document or series of documents which are created from the information provided under
this Agreement must be provided to the City. The Authorized Party may retain one copy for its own records
but may not disclose it without City permission, except in defense of claims brought against it.
P-J
AUTHORIZED PARTY:
By:
Title (If Applicable):
CITY OF Edina
By:
City Manager
Date:
Date:
•
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 23
C
0
w91A, '% EXHIBIT H
CITY OF EDINA
m
x �y NOTICE TO PERSONS UNDER AGE OF 18
J .2
r•
Some of the information you are asked to provide is classified as private under state law. You have the right to
request that some of the information not be given to one or both of your parents /legal guardians. Please complete the
form below if you wish to have information withheld.
Your request does not automatically mean that the information will be withheld. State law requires the City to
determine if honoring the request would be in your best interest. The City is required to consider:
• Whether you are of sufficient age and maturity to explain the reasons and understand the consequences,
• Whether denying access may protect you from physical or emotional harm,
• Whether there is reasonable grounds to support your reasons, and
• Whether the data concerns medical, dental, or other health services provided under Minnesota Statutes
Sections 144.341 to 144.347. If so, the data may be released only if failure to inform the parent would
seriously jeopardize your health.
NOTICE GIVEN TO:
BY
Date:
(Title)
Request to Withhold Information
request that the following information:
Be withheld from:
For these reasons:
I have received and reviewed this notice:
Date of Birth:
Print Name Signature
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 24
w°crA, -1 EXHIBIT
o @ \ SAMPLE CONTRACT PROVISION
y DATA PRACTICES ACT
J .b
Data Practices Compliance. Contractor will have access to data collected or maintained by the City to the
extent necessary to perform Contractor's obligations under this contract. Contractor agrees to maintain all data
obtained from the City in the same manner as the City is required under the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13. Contractor will not release or disclose the contents of data
classified as not public to any person except at the written direction of the City. Contractor agrees to defend
and indemnify the City, its elected officials and employees, from any claim, liability, damage or loss asserted
against the City, its elected officials and employees, as a result of Contractor's failure to comply with the
requirements of the Act or this contract. Upon termination of this contract, Contractor agrees to return data to
the City, as requested by the City.
Adopted Edina City Council April 1998, February 6, 2001 & April 7, 2015 Page 1 25
•
•
s
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
,
e ' 1
o -' tit
0
^CORPOPA��
1888
Agenda Item #: IV.K.
From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑X
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: 7200 France Avenue Extension From Action
Action Requested:
Approve the extension requested for City action to May 12, 2015.
Information /Background:
(Deadline for City Action- May 6, 2015)
The applicant has requested another extension to May 12th, 2015 for the City to take action on their
development project. They wish to continue to examine the drainage issues in the area and monitor the
development of guiding principles for development in the Southdale Area and the west side of France
Avenue.
ATTACHMENTS:
0 Applicant request for extension
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Cary Teague
'from: Adam Seraphine <adam @adamseraphine.com>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 6:21 PM
To: Cary Teague; Lori Boisclair
Cc: Sheldon Berg
Subject: 7200 France - Extension
Dear Cary,
7200 France, LLC, the applicant, hereby agrees to extend the action deadline for its Redevelopment of 7200
France application, under Mn. Stat. 15.99 to May 12, 2015.
It is our understanding this notice satisfies the City's extension requirement. Please confirm the City's receipt
and acceptance of 7200 France LLC's extension.
Thank you,
7200 France, LLC
ADAM SERAPHINE
•P 5353 Wayzata Blvd :: Suite 400 :: Minneapolis, MN 55416
H 612.616.5801 :: FX 952.400.5611
AdamSeraphine.Com
We have moved! :: Please note our new address.
0
1
'5 �
,k
O�
Fe
rfl,
'�L,
o
Will
L Item M IV. L
Action
Discussion ❑
iformation ❑
Subject: Human Rights and Relations Commission resignation and alternate appointment
Action Requested:
Appoint HRRC alternate, Sarah Rinn, to fill un- scheduled vacancy for a term starting 5/1/15 and ending
3/1/18.
Information / Background:
In March, Human Rights and Relations Commissioner Laura Davis turned in her official
resignation effective May I, 2015. Applicant, Sarah Rinn, was interviewed in January and
was selected as an alternate for the HRRC in the case of an un- scheduled vacancy. As
determined by City Council, alternates were selected during the appointment process to
close the gap on vacant seats for Boards and Commissions. Sarah Rinn is interested in
serving upon approval from City Council.
Attachment.
Resignation Letter.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
MJ Lamon
From: Laura J. Davis <jdlaura2004 @yahoo.com>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 8:03 PM
To: Patrice Arseneault; MJ Lamon
Subject: Resignation :(
Ladies,
I'll be moving out of Edina on May 1 so, sadly I need to be resign from the commission following the April meeting. I'd
like to continue on the working group with Arnie and the others and I suggest that soon we identify another commission
member to join /head the group until we're done with this phase of our work.
Thanks very much,
Laura
•
ow e �,
o
• /�roR�B �9 •
L Item #: IV. M.
From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Action ❑X
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -36 Setting Public Hearing To Be Held On May 6, 2015 for
Living Streets Plan
Action Requested:
Approve Resolution No. 2015 -36 setting public hearing to be held on May 6, 2015, for the Living Streets
Plan.
Information / Background:
Staff is requesting a public hearing for the Living Streets Plan to be held at the City Council meeting on May
6, at 7 p.m.
Staff will submit the Living Streets Plan to the City Council on April 21.
Attachment:
Resolution No. 2015 -36 Setting Public Hearing To Be Held On May 6, 2015
G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA391 Living Streets \Living Streets Plan \Item IV.M. Res. No. 2015-36 Setting Public Improvement Hearing.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
0
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -36
SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 6, 2015
FOR LIVING STREETS PLAN
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 6th day of May 2015, in the Council
Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m., to consider the Living Streets Plan;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice
of such hearing as required by law.
Dated: April 7, 2015
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
•
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of April 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of
,20
City Clerk
Agenda Item V. A.
•
ai1*14] W!l'u I_r d [0]11 1
Whereas, each year, Minnesota's underground utility infrastructure is jeopardized by
unintentional damage by those who fail to call 81 1 to have underground lines located prior to
digging. Undesired consequences such as service interruption, damage to the environment and
personal injury and even death are the potential results; and
Whereas, Gopher State One Call promotes 811, the national Call- Before - You -Dig number,
which provides professional excavators and homeowners a simple number to reach Gopher State
One Call to request utility line locations at the intended dig site; and
Whereas, through education of safe digging practices, professional excavators and homeowners
can save time and money keeping Minnesota safe and connected by making a simple call to 81 1 in
advance of any digging project; waiting the required amount of time; respecting the marked lines
by maintaining visual definition throughout the course of the excavation; and finally, digging with
care around the marks; and
Whereas, Gopher State One Call serves the citizens of Minnesota at no cost to taxpayers
spreads the message that safe digging is a shared responsibility and "To know what's below; Call
81 1 before you dig ".
Now, Therefore, the City Council of the City of Edina, does herby proclaim the month of April,
2015 as:
SAFE DIGGING MONTH IN MINNESOTA
And encourage excavators and homeowners throughout Minnesota to always call 81 1 before
digging. Safe digging is no accident.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby set my hand, and cause the Seal of the City of Edina to be
affixed, this 7th day of April 2015.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
0
ch
o
•'���RPOR�'��D •
ieex
To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: V.B.
From: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Action 0
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Public Health Week Proclamation
Action Requested:
Adopt the attached Proclamation of Public Health Week in the City of Edina for the week of April 6-
12, 2015.
Information / Background:
The American Public Health Association sponsors National Public Health Week each year to draw
attention to public health issues throughout the United States. Public Health focuses on prevention,
education and outreach to help individuals make safe and healthy decisions. Safe environments, healthy
choices and preventative lifestyle habits have the potential to increase life expectancy and have
community -wide economic benefits.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
•
PROCLAMATION
PUBLIC HEALTH WEEK
WHEREAS, the week of April 6 — 12, 2015, is National Public Health Week in the United States and
the theme is "Healthiest Nation 2030 "; and
WHEREAS, since 1995, the American Public Health Association, through its sponsorship of National
Public Health Week, has educated the public, policymakers and public health
professionals about issues important to improving the public's health; and
WHEREAS, preventing diseases before they start is critical to helping people live longer, healthier
lives while managing health - related costs; and
WHEREAS, preventable chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes are responsible
for millions of premature deaths each year; and
WHEREAS, chronic diseases cause Americans to miss 2.5 billion days of work each year, resulting in
lost productivity totaling more than $1 trillion; and
WHEREAS, investing just $10 per person each year in proven, community -based public health
efforts could save the nation more than $16 billion within five years; and
WHEREAS, a strong public health system is critical for sustaining and improving community health.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims April 6 —
12, 2015, as
PUBLIC HEALTH WEEK
In the City of Edina, MN and call upon the people of Edina to observe this week by
helping out families, friends, neighbors, co- workers and leaders better understand the
value of public health and adopt preventive lifestyle habits in light of this year's theme,
"Healthiest Nation 2030 ".
Dated this 7th day of April, 2015.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Item V. C.
PROCLAMATION
Earth Day 2015
WHEREAS, the global community now faces extraordinary challenges, such as global health issues, food
and water shortages, and economic struggles; and
WHEREAS, all people, regardless of race, gender, income, or geography, have a moral right to a healthy,
sustainable environment with economic growth; and
WHEREAS, it is understood that the citizens of the global community must step forward and take action
to create a green economy to combat the aforementioned global challenges; and
• WHEREAS, a green economy can be achieved on the individual level through educational efforts, public
policy, and consumer activism campaigns; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to broaden and diversify this global movement to achieve maximum success.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina hereby proclaims April 22, 2015, as EARTH DAY
in order to support green economy initiatives in the City of Edina and to encourage others to undertake
similar actions.
FURTHERMORE, let it be known that the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby encourages its residents,
businesses and institutions to use EARTH DAY to honor and celebrate the earth and commit to building
a sustainable and green economy.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, have hereunto set my hand and
caused the seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this seventh day of April, 2015.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
To: Mayor and Council
From: David Nelson, Police Chief
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: National Telecommunications Week Proclamation
w91�-�j�
o e
r In �t4l
o
•''��Y�RIY�ctrict ?� •
iaaa
Agenda Item #: V. E.
Action ❑
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
Action Requested:
Adopt the attached Proclamation of National Telecommunications Week in the City of Edina for the
week of April 12 -18, 2015.
Information / Background:
Each year, the second full week of April is dedicated to the men and women who serve as Public Safety
Telecommunicators. We know the idea was created in Contra Costa County, California in 1981, when
Sheriff Rainey realized the need to recognize the good work taking place inside the communications
centers.
I Let this be a time to thank and honor those who dedicate their lives to serving the public. It is a week
that should be set aside so everyone can be made aware of their hard work and dedication of what
goes on behind the scenes in the Edina Communications Center.
City of Edina - 4801 W. SO' St. • Edina, MN 55424
:7
PROCLAMATION
NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY
TELECOMMUNICATORS WEEK
WHEREAS, the week of April 12th — 18th, 2015, is National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week
in the United States; and
WHEREAS, since 1981, the Association of Public- Safety Communications Officials —APCO
International, through its sponsorship of National Public Safety Telecommunicators
Week, has educated the public, policymakers and public health professionals about
issues important to improving the public's safety Telecommunicators; and
WHEREAS, emergencies can occur at anytime that require police, fire or emergency medical
services, when an emergency occurs, the prompt response of police officers,
firefighters and paramedics is critical to the protection of life and preservation of
property; and
WHEREAS, the safety of our police officers and firefighters is dependent upon the quality
and accuracy of information obtained from citizens who telephone the Edina
Police -Fire Communications Center; and
WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators are the first and most critical contact our
citizens have with emergency services; and •
WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators are the single vital link for our police
officers and firefighters by monitoring their activities by radio, providing
them information and insuring their safety; and
WHEREAS, Public Safety Telecommunicators of the Edina Police Department have
contributed substantially to the apprehension of the criminals, suppression of
fires and treatment of patients; and
WHEREAS, each dispatcher has exhibited compassion, understanding and professionalism
during the performance of their job in the past year; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims
April 1 2d, — 18th, 2015, as
PUBLIC SAFETY TELECOMMUNICATORS WEEK
In the City of Edina, MN and call upon the people of Edina to observe this week in
honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep the residents
and city of Edina safe.
Dated this 7th day of April, 2015. •
James B. Hovland, Mayor
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: Karen M. Kurt, Assistant City Manager
Cary Teague, Community Dev. Dir.
Date: April 7, 2015
okt Le�' r
�,4�CN �y
• J��RPOPAT�9 •
1BBD
Agenda Item #: VI.A
Action ❑x
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Adoption of Small
Area Plan For Wooddale Valley View, Resolution No. 2015 -32
Action Requested:
Adopt the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
Information / Background:
Attached is the completed Wooddale/Valley View (WVV) Small Area Plan. The neighborhood commercial
node at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road was one of four areas identified for future study in the
2008 Comprehensive Plan. The project began in May 2014, with a planning team appointed in July 2014 and
a consultant team identified in August 2014. Participants in the WVV planning process are outlined in the
table below:
WVV Planning Team
Consultant Team
Staff
Arlene Forrest (co- chair)
Peter Musty, LLC (project lead)
Karen Kurt, Assistant City
Susan Lee (co- chair)
Weber Community Planning
Manager
Rob Burley, business owner
Biko Associates, Inc.
Cary Teague, Community
Connie Carrino, resident
Maxfield Research
Development Director
Brian Durst, resident
Economic Development Services, Inc.
Lindy Crawford, City
Carrie Fordahl, business owner
Management Fellow
Rita Paris, resident
Jim Schedin, resident
Community outreach for this plan included:
• Four community meetings /workshops Qune 18, October 11, November 8 and December 3)
• Meetings with neighborhood associations and individual businesses /property owners, and
• Online communication through the City's website, NextDoor and Speak Up, Edina!
The WVV Small Area Plan includes recommended goals, policies and implementation steps with respect to
economic vitality, land use and community design, and transportation.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2
0 The significant changes to the land use portion of the Comprehensive Plan, include the following:
1. Increase in height at the northwest and northeast quadrant of the Valley View and Wooddale
intersection from two stories to three stories. (See page 35.)
2. Increase the maximum residential density from 12 units per acre to 30 units per acre. (See page 32.)
Planning Commission Recommendation: On March 25, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously
recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment: Vote: 9 Ayes, 0 Nays. (See attached
Planning Commission minutes.)
Attachments:
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Minutes from the March 25, 2015 Planning Commission meeting
Resolution 2015 -32
•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-32
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
TO ADD THE WOODDALE VALLEY VIEW SMALL AREA PLAN INTO
THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. BACKGROUND & FINDINGS.
1.01 The Wooddale Valley View area is cited as an area of potential change in the Edina
Comprehensive Plan; as such the City Council authorized the Planning Commission to
complete a Small Area Plan.
1.02 A planning and consultant team was assembled to develop the Plan in June of 2014. The
planning team consisted of two members of the Planning Commission and six local business
and resident representatives.
1.03 Over the past nine months community outreach included four community
meetings/ workshops (June 18, October 11, November 8 and December 3); Meetings with
neighborhood associations and individual businesses/ property owners; and online
communication through the City's website, NextDoor and Speak Up, Edina!
1.04 The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan includes recommended goals, policies and
implementation steps with respect to economic vitality, land use and community design, and
transportation.
1.05 Required changes to the Zoning Ordinance includes an increase in height at the northwest and
northeast quadrant of the Valley View and Wooddale intersection from two stories to three
stories; and a rezoning of the sites zoned PCD -4, Planned Commercial District 4 (Gas Stations)
to PCD -1, Planned Commercial District 1, similar to the adjacent Zoning District.
1.06 There would be an increase in the maximum residential density from 12 units per acre to 30
units per acre.
1.07 On March 25, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan. Vote: 9
Ayes and 0 Nays.
Section 2. APPROVAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the
16 Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Met Council approval:
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424
www.EdinaMN.izov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -32
Page Two
•
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
CITY OF EDINA
)SS
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of April 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015.
•
City Clerk
is
0
�J
I
D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment — Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Presentation
Commissioner Lee introduced to the Commission members of the Wooddale Valley
View (WW) Work Group in attendance: Connie Carrino, Bill Weber, Peter Musty and
Bill Smith. Lee thanked those members for their work on the small area plan.
Continuing, Lee said in her opinion the Wooddale Valley View process worked very well
with active engagement from the community throughout the process. Lee reported that
throughout the process it became apparent that the four corners (Wooddale Valley
View) are significant Lee delivered a power point presentation on the Wooddale Valley
View Small Area Plan.
• Discussion
Commissioner Hobbs referred to the WW plan and asked Commissioner Lee where in
the City a 30 -unit per acre development can be found. Commissioner Lee responded
she's not sure; however, the density follows the goal of capping building height. Chair
Platteter asked if anyone knows what the building height/density is at the SW corner of
the plan area. Planner Teague responded that he believes that building is three stories,
adding, he was unsure of the density. Platteter suggested looking into the density of
that site prior to City Council, adding a visual example would be of benefit.
Commissioner Carr commented that she thinks the "Plan" is terrific and thanked
everyone for their hard work on the Plan. Carr stated she wonders if the WVV Plan was
too detailed for the Comprehensive Plan. She referred to building heights /stories, etc.
detail and asked if an application was submitted with greater building height and /or
density would the Comprehensive Plan need to be amended. Planner Teague
responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest commented that the WVV Plan
could be considered an overlay district which offers protection of the guiding principles.
Commissioner Carr said that personally she doesn't like repetitively amending the
Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Nemerov stated he thinks the plan is very well done; however, has some
questions on the vision and how to achieve the vision, adding in his opinion if the vision
is successful parking and an increase in traffic could become an issue. Nemerov said
•
he visited a similar area in another city that underwent a very successful "change ";
however, that change brought increased traffic. Commissioner Lee said she could
• envision that scenario happening here, adding she believes the "Plan" would allow for it.
Lee further noted that if a redevelopment spark occurs the "Plan" does address
structured parking.
Commissioner Forrest commented that in achieving the "vision" so much depends on
the individual property owners. Forrest also reported that the WVV work group
presented this plan to the Transportation Commission.
Public Hearing
Chair Platteter opened the public hearing.
No one spoke to the issue.
Commissioner Nemerov moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olsen
seconded the motion. Public hearing closed.
Discussion
A discussion ensued with Commissioners complimenting the plan and its guiding
principles. Planner Teague was asked to clarify the process.
• Planner Teague explained the Planning Commission would be required to adopt the
plan as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Plan would be forwarded to the City
Council for their adoption and sent to Met Council for their comments.
•
Motion
Commissioner Carr moved adoption of the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
into the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the
motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Wooddale Valley View
SMALL AREA PLAN
Published
March 19, 2015
0
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
City Council Members
James Hovland Mayor
Kevin Staunton
Bob Stewart
Mary Brindle
Ann Swenson
City Planning Commission Members
Michael Platteter
Chair
Claudia Carr
Vice -Chair
Arlene Forrest*
St Louis Park
Steven Hobbs
Biko Associates, Inc.
Susan Lee*
Joe Hollman
Ian Nemerov
Minneapolis
10 Ann Olsen
Economic Development Services
Gerard Strauss
Todd Thorsen
Taylor Halva
Student
Madison Seeley
Student
(* - co- liaisons to Small
Area Planning Team)
Small Area Planning Team Members (Volunteer)
Arlene Forrest Co -Chair
Susan Lee Co -Chair
Rob Burley
Connie Carrino
Brian Durst
Carrie Fordahl
Rita Paris
Jim Schedin
�,��A,l�
V �
o
�OItPO�
1808
City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424
Karen Kurt Assistant City Manager kkurt@EdinaMN.gov
Cary Teague Community Development Director cteague @EdinaMN.gov
Lindy Crawford City Management Fellow Irawford@EdinaMN.gov
Consulting Team Members
Peter Musty
(consultant lead) PETER MUSTY LLC
Minneapolis
William Weber
Weber Community Planning
St Louis Park
William Smith
Biko Associates, Inc.
Minneapolis
Joe Hollman
Maxfield Research
Minneapolis
Janna King
Economic Development Services
Roseville
•
•
Table of Contents
ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................. ............................... iv
Chapter1 Introduction ...................................................................... ..............................1
1.1 Purpose
1.2 The Study Area
1.3 Community Engagement and Planning Process
1.4 Major Planning Issues
1.5 Guiding Principles
Chapter 2 Demographic and Market Profile .......................... .............................13
2.1 Demographic Characteristics
2.2 Real Estate Market Conditions
Chapter3 Economic Vitality ........................................................... .............................19
3.1 Current Conditions ............................................................ ............................... 20
3.2 Trends and Challenges ......................................................... .............................21
3.3 Goals and Policies ................................................................ .............................24
3.4 Implementation Steps ....................................................... ............................... 26
Chapter 4 Land Use and Community Design .......................... .............................27
4.1 Current Conditions .............................................................. .............................28
4.2 Trends and Challenges ........................................................ .............................29
4.3 Goals and Policies ............................................................... .............................30
Goals................................................................................. .............................30
Policies............................................................................... .............................31
Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) ........ .............................32
Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines .................... .............................34
BuildingHeight Limits Plan ............................................. .............................34
Building Frontage Guidelines ......................................... .............................36
Gathering Space Guidelines .......................................... .............................39
Site - Specific Guidelines ................................................. .............................41
Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road.......... 42
Fairfax Avenue and West 61st Street (South Side) .............................43
City -owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road ..................44
Eastern Gateway - Oaklawn Ave., West 62nd St., Valley View Road.. 48
General Guidelines for the Entire Study Area ................ .............................50
On -Site Parking and Site Access .......................... ............................... 50
Other Improvements ......................................... ............................... 50
Heritage Preservation ........................................ ............................... 51
4.4 Implementation Steps ...................................................... ............................... 52
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
i I P a g e
0
•
Chapter 5 Transportation and Street Resign ...................... ............................... 53
5.1 Current Conditions .............................................................. .............................54
5.2 Trends and Challenges ......................................................... .............................58
5.3 Goals and Policies ............................................................. ............................... 61
5.4 Implementation Steps ...................................................... ............................... 69
EdinaMN.gov /WW Project Archive
In addition to materials and documents from the community process, the webpage includes:
• Community Generated List of Identified Issues
• Community Engagement Plan
• Report on Demographic Profile and Market Trends
• Summary of Business Owner and Property Owner Opinion
• Land Use and Community Design — Discovery Materials
• Transportation and Street Design - Discovery Materials
• Original High Resolution PDFs:
• Figure 4.4 Building Frontage Guidelines
• Figure 4.9 Site Capacity Alternatives: City -Owned Site
o Figure 4.11 Eastern Gateway Design Study
ii I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
List of Figures
Figure 1.1
Wooddale Valley View Planning Process ........................ ............................... 5
Figure1.2
The Study Area ................................................................ ............................... 6
Figure 1.3
City of Edina Small Area Plan Roles ................................. ...............................
7
Figure 2.1
Wooddale Valley View's Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Area ........16
Figure 4.1
Existing Properties: Building Types, Year Built and Current Land Uses ........28
Figure 4.2
Preferred Land Use Plan .................................................. .............................32
Figure 4.3
Building Height Limits Plan .............................................. .............................35
Figure 4.3b Building Height Limits: Existing Zoning Overlay ............. .............................35
Figure 4.4
Building Frontage Guidelines ........................................ ...............................
37
Figure 4.5
Building Frontage Guidelines: Street Context Areas ....... .............................38
Figure 4.6
Illustration of Public Space Guidelines for the Northwest Corner of
Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road ....................... .............................40
Figure 4.7
Key Map of Site - Specific Guidelines (Sites A -D) .............. .............................41
Figure 4.8
Assembly Options for the City -Owned Site ..................... .............................45
Figure 4.9
Three Alternatives for Properties A +B: City -Owned Site .............................46
Figure 4.10 Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B as "Flex Commercial" .......47
Figure 4.11 Eastern Gateway Design Study ........................................ .............................49
Figure 5.1
Wooddale Avenue: Existing Conditions ........................ ...............................
55
Figure 5.2
Valley View Road: Existing Conditions ........................... ...............................
56
Figure 5.3
Valley View Road: Illustrative of Long -Range Policy ....... .............................63
Figure 5.4
Alternative #3; Oak Lawn, 62nd and Valley View Intersection Study ...........
64
•
Figure 5.5 Wooddale Avenue: Illustrative of Long -Range Policy ..... .............................65
Figure 5.6 Public Realm Improvements ........................................... .............................68
List of Tables
Table 3A Comparable Traffic Counts ............................................. ............................... 23
Table 3B Implementation Steps for Economic Vitality ................... .............................26
Table 4A Description of Neighborhood Node Land Use Category . .............................33
Table 4B Implementation Steps for Land Use and Community Design .......................52
Table 5A Historical and Forecast Daily Traffic Volumes ................. .............................58
Table 5B Implementation Steps for Transportation and Street Design ...................... 69
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan iii. I P a g e
Introduction
Purpose
The Study Area
Community Engagement and Planning Process
Major Planning Issues
Guiding Principles
•
Chapter 1- Introduction
1.1 Purpose
The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan (WVVSAP) is intended to be adopted
as an addendum to the current Edina Comprehensive Plan. Small area plans
outline a community vision to be implemented over an extended period of time.
Small area plans do not guarantee that, what, when or how redevelopment will
occur.
The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan provides detailed guidance in the
areas of economic vitality, land use, community design, transportation and
street design. Topics not covered under the Small Area Plan revert to the
Comprehensive Plan.
Why the Small Area Plan was Developed
The Wooddale Valley View neighborhood commercial node was first identified in
the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan as an area of potential change. In 2014, the
City Council directed the Planning Commission and City Community
Development Staff to undertake a small area planning process that would 1)
seek to provide the template for future small area plans and 2) provide proactive
• guidance for shaping future development in the form of a small area plan for the
Wooddale Valley View neighborhood node.
•
This plan represents a collaborative nine
month effort by a diverse and interdisciplinary
team of staff, consultants and committed
community volunteers. Efforts were made to
balance the concerns and values of Wooddale
Valley View's residents, landowners, and other
stakeholders with the parameters set by
physical conditions on the ground, Edina's
historic and economic context, and an
awareness of emerging trends in the local and
regional real estate market.
There exists a
simple but strong
community desire
to nurture vitality
at Wooddale
Valley View.
This plan creates a long range decision - making, planning and design framework that
allows existing assets to thrive while needed new investments are introduced in a
carefully planned and sensitively designed manner. The plan is balanced; while it
provides strong guidelines for transitions to surrounding neighborhoods, the plan
maintains real estate market flexibility for Wooddale Valley View's businesses and
investors.
Page 12
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 1 - Introduction
•
How the Small Area Plan will be Used
The Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan serves as an important tool for
landowners, developers, city planners, city council members and planning
commission members when evaluating future development projects. In addition,
the Plan outlines specific action steps for the City and other stakeholders to
support the long term vision for the area.
Developers and landowners will find the plan useful when conceptualizing and
preparing development plans for implementation in the Wooddale /Valley View
Small Area Plan study area. Reviewing the Small Area Plan during the early
stages of project development will inform developers of City- adopted directions,
standards and guidelines and will ultimately prove to be a time- and resource -
saving measure that can streamline the development review process.
City staff will find the plan to be a useful tool when explaining and illustrating
City- adopted directions, standards, and guidelines to developers. They will then
be able to use the plan's principles, goals, and policies to assess and evaluate the
degree to which developers' plans adhere to City directions and the impact of
variances developers might seek.
The Planning Commission will use the plan when deciding whether to approve
development proposals and pass them along to the City Council for adoption.
How the Small Area Plan is Structured
The Wooddale /Valley View Small Area Plan is organized similar to the
Comprehensive Plan. The plan includes:
® Major Issues
Guiding Principles
• Goals, Policies and Guidelines
® Implementation Steps
The plan was developed through an iterative process beginning with input from
community members at a kickoff meeting that was held in June 2014. In
addition to community members, others involved in the process were a Small
Area Planning Team, appointed by the Planning Commission; City staff; and a
consultant team. The iterative nature of the process permitted conclusions
reached in one phase of the Small Area Plan study to be re- visited and discussed
by each of the participants and, if necessary, revised to take new ideas and new
information into account.
Issues. One of the first products developed in the process was a list of five major
issues, which were synthesized from over one hundred issues identified by
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 3
0 Chapter 1- Introduction
•
community members. Analysis of the major issues led to the development of 12
Guiding Principles, which respond to the issues as a realm of development and
design guidance representing an "ideal' situation. The list of major issues also
helped direct the development of the three primary plan chapters:
Economic Vitality
• Land Use and Community Design
• Transportation and Street Design
Guiding Principles. The Guiding Principles were vetted by all participants in the
process at the Dream (Visioning) Workshop that was held in December 2014.
Consideration of the high level Guiding Principles for each of the plan's three
primary plan chapters (Economic Vitality, Land Use and Community design, and
Transportation and Street Design) led to the development of more practical
chapter - specific goals.
Goals. The goals that were developed for each of the three final plan chapters
identify future ambitions and desires, specifically focused on the resolution of
chapter - specific issues.
Policies. Policies for each of the three plan policy chapters were developed
following the development of issue - focused goals. The policies, also issue -
focused, are statements that are intended guide decisions and achieve rational
outcomes, typically written as direction for City staff, Planning Commission or
City Council. They are statements of intent to be implemented as a procedure or
protocol. In the case of the Small Area Plan's three final plan chapters, the
policies firmly state what the City will do to address the element- specific issues.
Guidelines. Policies in some cases often include even more specific guidelines
that communicate framework of preferences and parameters for decisions from
district wide issues to a specific property or street design issues.
Implementation Steps. The final product presented in each of the three final
plan chapters is a table of implementation steps, which identifies actions the City
will take, the agency within the City that will lead, and the timeframe for acting.
Figure 1.1 on the following page shows how input from community members
contributed direction and substance to the Wooddale Valley View Small Area
Plan's three major outcomes; Goals, Policies and Implementation Steps.
P a g e 14 Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
C:
Chapter 1 - Introduction
From Issues to Implementation
The Wooddale Valley View Model
ConsuttantTeam and SHPT
Process Ideas, Opinions, Reactions
Core Elements Plan
Draft Set of Goats for Economic
Vitalitv, Land Use, Communitv
Consultant Team Experience, staff
Direction, SAPT Overview
Draft Small Area Plan
Goals, Policies and Implementation Steps
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Figure 1.1
Wooddale Valley View Planning Process
Page15
•
•
Chapter 1- Introduction
1. Z The Study Area
Having always been a historical crossroad of commerce, the intersection of
Wooddale Road and Valley View Road has seen many changes through the years.
As the population of Edina grew, the surrounding neighborhoods expanded and
matured. The road system was revised, altering the types of services and
businesses that came to occupy the once busy corner.
The area of study addressed during the planning process included the public
street rights -of -way and several land parcels in the immediate vicinity of the
intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Figure. 1.2 shows the
Study Area with a dotted white line. Included are areas designated in the 2008
Edina Comprehensive Plan as 'Neighborhood Commercial (NC)' as well as
adjacent 'High Density Residential (HDR)'.
The vast majority of the recommendations in this plan document address issues
within this approximate area of study. However, where practical, some
connections, impacts, relationships and transitions to areas immediately
adjacent or close -by were also studied and addressed in this plan.
s _
M
P2 .,
Study Area
LDR - Low UeesltirRecidential
LDAR- Low Density, Attached Residential
MDR. Medium Density Residential
HDR - H igh Den; ityResidential
- NC- Neighborhood C ommercial
Page 16
° osF
(Pamela I
ftat
- OSP- Open Space and Padcs
PSP. PublicvrSemlaPubllo
Figure 2.2
The Study Area (showing Future land
Use Plan designations as Approved in
2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan)
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
is Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.3 Community Engagement and Planning Process
The planning process was conducted from June, 2014 through February, 2015. As
will be discussed, community engagement was the cornerstone of the Wooddale/
Valley View Small Area Plan planning process, and many opportunities were given
to community members to express their opinions and identify issues and concerns
about the Study Area. Milestone events during the process included:
Community Kickoff -June 2014
In June of 2014, over 70 community members turned out for an orientation
presentation and discussion about the upcoming Small Area Plan process. The
Kickoff meeting gave community members an opportunity to identify their
concerns about the Study Area.
Consultant Request for Information (Request for Proposal) - June 2014
Edina City Staff released a Request for Information to find a Consultant Team to
plan and lead community engagement events, conduct research and develop and
write the Small Area Plan document.
Small Area Planning Team
• (SAPT) Convened -June 2014
With assistance from City staff, a
•
working group of community
volunteers including business
owners, residents and Edina
Planning Commission
representatives were appointed
by the Edina Planning
Commission to guide the
planning process. Their first
meeting was in July of 2014. The
Small Area Planning Team (SAPT)
selected a Consultant Team,
through a competitive proposal
process that included interviews.
City Council
.'alt for a"n and Finai p:an a�pry rw
provde d�tson cN
oroiect sore
0
Consultant
4rvr- as tecAn,•,i i r.rnircr
Facdnate rnmn:unry mertmgs
Smshccim data
dart Olan do:ummt
Figure 1.3
City of Edina
Small Area Plan Roles
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 17
•
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Consultant Team Research
Background information on the Study Area was collected and in some cases
developed by the Consultant Team, including:
• Demographic and Real Estate Market
Profile
• Retail visibility
• Experiential analysis of context:
transitions from node to
neighborhood
• Typical frontage types (typical
building to street relationships)
• Building type, height, square footage
and year of construction
• Vehicle and bike parking counts
• Traffic projections
• Urban design characteristics
• Sustainability weaknesses and
opportunities
• Nearby community facilities
• Connections to surrounding
neighborhoods and open spaces
• Streetscape conditions
• Historic imagery, related informal
analysis, and development of
interesting historic aspects and
timelines
• Existing zoning and development
review process
• Photography of the node /context
Community Engagement Plan Development - September 2014
A formal Community Engagement Plan was developed by the Consultant Team
that outlined interactive events during each of three major phases of the
planning process: 1) Discovery, 2) Vision and 3) Plan Development. It was
reviewed and revised as deemed appropriate with the SAPT. Parallel outreach
and events subcommittees were formed by the SAPT to assist the Consultant
Team with implementation of the community engagement plan.
Community Outreach - September 2014 — December 2014
A website posting project information was updated throughout the process by
Edina City Staff, who also utilized the Speak Up, Edina! web -based discussion
forum to encourage online discussion of key issues.
Information was published via posters, postcards,
NextDoor and CityExtra.
On separate occasions, the Consultant Team leader and
an SAPT member visited the monthly neighborhood
meetings of the Pamela Park and the Concord
Neighborhood Associations. They informed the
neighborhood groups about the reason for the planning
process and the benefits of participating. They
obtained from each group a list of issues that those
present felt were relevant and important to address.
Pae�B
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 1 - Introduction
Key Stakeholder Interviews and Business Owner Survey — September /October 2014
Structured interviews were conducted by the Consultant Team with five
property owners, leasing agent for the Edina Village Market, and Gordon
Hughes, a long- serving, former city manager of the City of Edina. In addition, six
businesses completed a survey that assisted the Consulting Team in defining the
Study Area's trade area and also provided business owners an opportunity to
offer insights into the node's strengths and challenges. The interviews focused
on business - related conditions and future expectations.
Discovery Workshop — October 11, 2014
The first event conducted by the newly
assembled team of Consultants, City Staff and
SAPT was held on Saturday morning, October 11,
2014. The event was held at the Edina Village
Market in an empty storefront space. The
session included breakfast, a presentation
featuring key points in the history of the node,
and a consultant -led exercise called a discovery
walk -about where teams were given the tasks of
• touring the Study Area together to identify
issues. Following the walk - about, the teams
discussed their issues in a workshop.
•
community members document issues during the
Discovery Walk- About.
Dream (Visioning) Workshop — November S, 2014
The Dream Workshop was held at the Edina Senior Center on a Saturday morning.
The workshop included:
• Presentations by the Consultant Team on five Major Planning Issues and a set
of Organizing Principles drawn from community input
• Update on progress of consultant discovery work, including an explanation of
demographic and market trends and a summary of current attitudes in the
business community
• Interactive review of a Map of Potential Public Realm Improvements and a set
of long range scenarios for revitalization and redevelopment reflecting both
future market trends and the draft Organizing Principles
Small Area Plan: Wooddale - Valley View Neighborhood Node 9 1 P a g e
0 Chapter 1 - Introduction
Progress Update — December 3, 2014
A Progress Update session was held at the Edina Senior Center where a draft policy
framework, the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Core Elements, was
presented by the Consultant Team. The presentation was followed by conversations
between Consultant Team members and community members. SAPT members also
listened and recorded community member comments on the following boards that
were on display:
• Draft Land Use and Built Form 0 Design Study: East Gateway
Plan Redevelopment Concept (Valley
• Draft Building Frontage View Road at Oaklawn Avenue)
Guidelines 0 Draft Map of Public Realm
• Capacity Study: City Owned Site Improvements
at Valley View Road at Kellogg 0 Various Intersection
Avenue Improvement Studies: for
• Draft Public (Gathering) Space Intersection at Valley View
Guidelines Road, W. 62nd St and Oaklawn
• Design Study: Public (Gathering) Avenue
Space at Valley View Road and
Wooddale Avenue
Neighborhood residents and City staff members critiqued a rendering for the possible plaza near
the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road at the December 3 meeting.
10 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0 Chapter 1 - Introduction
•
1.4 Major Planning Issues
One of the community engagement tools used during the Discovery Workshop
(held on October 11, 2014), at the neighborhood outreach meetings, and by
SHPT members, was an exercise that challenged community members to identify
issues in the form of questions. Individuals were invited to address issues
ranging from more specific physical conditions and design preferences to
broader economic and planning issues. The intent was to 1) help city staff, the
Consultant Team and the SAPT better understand community attitudes, values
and ideas about the Study Area and 2) provide a framework for the
development of guiding principles, which would be used to define goals, policies
and implementation steps for the Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan.
Below are the five major planning issues that emerged from the milestone
community engagement activities previously described. The five issues were
synthesized from an initial list of over one hundred that were developed and
submitted by community members and stakeholders:
Economic Vitality What, if any, public or private actions
should be taken to revitalize the Study
Area in its current form?
Long Range Land Use What are the viable long range patterns of
land use in the Study Area?
Built Form Guidance What should be the physical parameters
for development of each site in the Study
Area?
Pedestrian Experience What should be done to improve the
experience of walking, bicycling or riding
the bus?
Placemaking What should be done, if anything, to
improve the Study Area's identity or sense
of "place "?
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 11
•
•
9
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.5 Guiding Principles
These principles, which were mentioned on the previous two pages, were initially
drafted by the Consultant Team during preparation of six long range scenarios
following the Discovery Workshop. The principles were vetted by the community at
the Dream Workshop along with scenarios and a list of public realm improvements.
They were subsequently revised by the Consultant Team and approved by the SAPT.
These principles steered the preparation of the goals, policies and implementation
steps in Chapters 3 -5 of this plan, and should be used by the City in the review of
development and redevelopment proposals and plans within the Study Area.
Place. The Study Area should be
recognizable as a place and visually
attractive.
Gathering. There should be a places
for people to spend leisure time,
whether in a commercial or public
locations.
Neighborhood Businesses. There
should be businesses that provide
services or goods desired in the
neighborhood, including small
offices. The amount and
configuration of commercial space
should be allowed to adjust in
response to the market. Property
owners are encouraged to keep
their properties economically viable
and attractive.
Housing. Sites should be allowed to
transition to housing from business
use in response to the changing
market demands.
Height and Size of Buildings. Future
buildings north of Valley View Road
should be one to three stories tall
depending on their location relative
to nearby single family housing.
Properties in sloping topography on
the south side of Valley View Rd
should be allowed to be four stories.
121Page
Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood.
Graceful transitions should be
maintained from more active areas to
quieter neighborhood streets
immediately beyond the node.
Parking. Most residential parking
should be in attached garages or under
the building. Views to commercial
parking should be softened by
plantings, walls or fences.
Street Edges. Buildings should be
located near the street sidewalk
without intervening parking. There
should be trees between the curb and
the sidewalk.
Circulation and Connections. Walking,
bicycling or catching the bus in the
Study Area should be safe and
comfortable. The Study Area should be
well - linked to the nearby
neighborhoods.
Role of the City. The City should
provide a land use plan, zoning
regulations, design guidelines and public
improvements that support the
intentions of the property owners and
the broader community while being
sufficiently flexible to guide alternative
ideas.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Demographic and
Market Profile
Demographic Characteristics 2.1
Real Estate Market Conditions 2.2
• Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile
291 Demographic Characteristics
The planning process included an analysis by the Consultant Team of
demographic characteristics at various scales of context including the larger
region, Edina, the Primary Market Area (PMA) and the Retail Trade Area (RTA).
See following page for definitions. It included population and household growth
trends and projections, age distribution, household income projections by age of
householder, household tenure trends by age of householder, shifts in
household type, employment growth trends and projections, and the commuting
patterns of residents and workers. The following are the major findings:
• There is an aging population.
The greatest growth in both the Retail Trade Area and the Primary Market
Area is expected among the 55+ age group (particularly 65 to 74). Projected
household growth among this group (empty nesters) in the RTA will generate
increasing demand for multifamily housing, predominately from married -
couple households with adult children seeking to downsize after their
children move out of the home.
• There is an influx of younger / married couples with children.
Edina and the Retail Trade Area are gaining married couple households with
children. By contrast, the rest of the larger Primary Market Area is losing
married couple households with children. The Retail Trade Area is also
expected to experience growth in the Echo Boom population (25 to 34),
while the PMA experiences growth in the 35 to 44 age group. The Primary
Market Area overall is gaining single - person and single - parent households.
is
• There is continued growth of affluent households.
Median household income ($137,992) in the Retail Trade Area is more than
double the Metro area ($66,599). Median household income in the Primary
Market Area ($71,285) is seven percent higher than the Metro Area. The
median household income in the RTA is projected to grow 4.8% per year
(2014 to 2020) compared to a 3.7% annual rate of growth in the PMA and the
Metro Area. Solid growth is anticipated in the upper- income brackets, which
likely will translate to increasing demand for dining, home furnishings,
specialty apparel, recreation, and luxury items.
• Solid job growth is occurring.
Edina gained 1,700 jobs ( +3.6 percent) between 2010 and 2013, led by
growth in industries that occupy office - space. Job growth is projected to
continue. Commuting patterns create an opportunity for retailers to capture
sales from the daytime population in the Retail Trade Area.
14 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile
Defining Wooddale Valley View's Primary Market Area and Retail Trade Area
Figure 2.1 illustrates the larger Primary Market Area (shown in blue) used in the
analysis of current demographic characteristics and for analysis of housing
market conditions and trends. The Primary Market Area (i.e. trade area, draw
area) is the geographic area from which between 70% and 80% of a housing
project's customer base (renters, home buyers, etc.) come. This is
communicated as a boundary map of Census Tracts surrounding the Study Area.
Because of traffic volumes and visibility of the Study Area, it was concluded that
the draw area for commercial and retail goods and services will be
neighborhood- oriented and will be smaller than the Primary Market Area for
housing. As such a Retail Trade Area submarket (shown in dark blue) was
established as the primary draw area for commercial /retail uses at Wooddale
Valley View.
Determination of the boundaries of the Primary Market Area and Retail Trade
Areas is based on several factors, including:
• Growth trends and demographic characteristics of the surrounding area;
• • Traffic and community orientation patterns;
• Geographic and man -made barriers;
• Places of employment;
• Renter leasing patterns;
• Discussions with Study Area business and property owners;
Note: Both of these boundaries are larger than the project Study Area defined
previously in this plan.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 15
•
•
•
Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile
haven
Si OF
c,
' Cha
t
� ty
lL
N
q
—:-4 I Fridley y
• ! Brooklyn i w - ,., ( � ,Kr - -- -- CR -96.
?4--E-:
�.
= _Centor a!
63rdAvap. - Y •674 -Wt +N
Bass t�ti�rrn 11,
Brighton
(
�
_.,�
-_rY.SSI
�' r.! -4Qtnavjrr- v1 n
—��
..
ew Hope
_
t. (C ,-,,Cord
��s
Rd
Rose
Medicine" v
Lake o �+jCR66 = f Laud�rdale
t;u:I1 cEt^
-
I
• cj A u �1 sir
' ii.i ct? .'.
_ .. '
i ..ar
l�fnneapoits
Wayzata
Y;
�s -12-E 1_ tl S
12'd1 -illµ! `�� •�
41S 13 aY
�, '
I :
i
7k: � c
�
.
- ` �04g ' `
Woodland
r��
� CR
-
� �� 1.q�'VIU
_Z5 rq Cj• t - -
haven
Si OF
c,
' Cha
t
� ty
:17th A�t` lg a i �, � •. , 1
t6 Iz'; r
atIN - Savage
r. ”
I
CR•42 140thStNE!
r !
J •�I�L�IJtI1�StaE '
Source: Maxfield Research, October 22, 2014.
161 Page
6
w
tnington' ' Eagan a
pd
C101 ' id
.t
;'• ' u Lebanon.
Regiont.1 f
4;, ��, d
d Y urnsvllle N7 `
U
Apple;_
Valle! Rosemou
,R -42-.E __:, -: CF
t FLtly � t'r'd ;
Figure 2.1
Wooddale Valley View's Primary
Market Area and Retad Trade Area
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
lL
N
I} G Jfld A:
n
�
j
3r r Ford Pky, l
t;u:I1 cEt^
I
1r4•I
1`
In nS EF] Ii v'St
PaU111IN
J
S2
. tirl „rt
:17th A�t` lg a i �, � •. , 1
t6 Iz'; r
atIN - Savage
r. ”
I
CR•42 140thStNE!
r !
J •�I�L�IJtI1�StaE '
Source: Maxfield Research, October 22, 2014.
161 Page
6
w
tnington' ' Eagan a
pd
C101 ' id
.t
;'• ' u Lebanon.
Regiont.1 f
4;, ��, d
d Y urnsvllle N7 `
U
Apple;_
Valle! Rosemou
,R -42-.E __:, -: CF
t FLtly � t'r'd ;
Figure 2.1
Wooddale Valley View's Primary
Market Area and Retad Trade Area
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile
•
2.2 Real Estate Market Conditions
Both quantitative and qualitative market research were conducted during the
planning process to assess market support for various real estate types in the
immediate Study Area. The research considered potential for retail commercial
land uses and multiple - family, senior, and rental housing. The Project Archive,
found at EdinaMN.gov /WVV, presents the complete and detailed market analysis,
a profile of properties, and a summary of interviews and surveys with property and
business owners. The findings of the quantitative market analysis are summarized
below characterizing demand trends for office space, retail space and housing.
New Retail Business Space
• Small neighborhood business can thrive in the area.
Some opportunity exists for neighborhood- oriented retailers catering to
high - income family households and for business establishments that offer
services to local households such as:
■ Full- service and limited- service restaurants;
■ Healthcare and personal care stores and providers;
■ Insurance agencies, accountants, real estate agents.
• Beyond that mentioned above, fairly limited demand for new retail space
in the Study Area was found.
Retail vacancy in 2014 was at 7.2 percent in the primary market area. Retail
space availability in top trade areas (i.e. Edina) is tightening. Additionally, high
household incomes and expenditures contribute to significant "leakage" of
retail sales in several neighborhood- or convenience - oriented retail categories.
Residents don't need to travel far out of the Study Area for goods /services.
(Retail leakage occurs when community members spend money outside the
area or when money spent in an area is transferred out of the area.)
New Office Space
• Limited demand was found for new office space in the Study Area.
Vacancy rates for office space remain high: 17.4 percent in the Twin Cities,
16.5 percent in the Southwest Submarket. The market for medical office
space is tighter (5.6 percent off - campus vacancy rate in the southwest
metro). Most office -using business establishments in the Study Area are
relatively small in size. The existing supply of vacant office space in Edina can
satisfy much of the projected growth.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 17
Chapter 2 - Demographic and Market Profile
Regionally, it is expected that business growth will occur in industries that
provide services to local households.
Business establishments in sectors such as health care, insurance, accounting,
and real estate, could be drawn to existing commercial space in the area.
New Housing
• A particularly strong and increasing demand for active adult senior housing
was found.
There are roughly 4,000 senior housing units in the Primary
Forfull definitions of
Market Area: 10 percent active adult* (independent living
senior housing terms such
without services available), 63 percent congregate*
as 'active adult,
(independent living with services available), 20 percent
'congregate; 'assisted
assisted living`, and 7 percent memory care *. At the end of
living' and 'memory care',
2014, six projects with 484 senior housing units are planned
see the Senior Market
or under construction in the Primary Market Area. While
Housing Analysis (pages
there is one active adult project under construction in Edina,
36 -37) of the Market
it appears that the market could support additional active
Potential Analysis found
adult units, and it is believed that the Study Area would serve
in the Project Archive at
EdinaMN.gov /WW.
as a viable location for active adult senior housing.
• The demand and prices for for -sale multi - family homes are also increasing.
General occupancy for -sale multifamily market conditions in Edina seem to
be fairly robust, with increasing sales and rising prices. In Edina, townhome
pricing increased 7 percent between 2009 and 2013. Condo prices are up 11
percent. It was found that demand exists for new for -sale multifamily units
in the area, and a new for -sale multifamily development located in the Study
Area would likely be well- received in the market.
• There is pent -up demand and rising rental rates for general occupancy
rental housing around the Study Area. However, opportunities for new
rental housing in the Study Area may be further out.
Below- equilibrium vacancy rates translates to pent -up demand and rising
rental rates. There is a 2.4 percent vacancy rate in Edina and 2.6 percent
vacancy rate in the Twin Cities (5.0 percent is considered equilibrium). Heavy
development activity is occurring nearby. There are eight projects with over
1,700 units in the Primary Market Area. However, because there are
currently several rental housing projects in development at locations within
Edina and the Primary Market Area that are better - suited for rental housing,
it is not recommended that rental housing development should be sought in
the near -term. A smaller - scale, rental project that capitalizes on the
neighborhood feel of the Study Area could be feasible by 2020.
13 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Economic Vitality
Current Conditions
3..1
Trends and Challenges
3.2
Goals and Policies
3.3
Implementation Steps
3.4
• Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
3.1 Current Conditions
As noted earlier in the plan, business activity at the node has evolved over the
past 50 years due to changes in consumer patterns, changes in the roadway
network, and the growth of the Southdale, Grandview, and 50t" and France
commercial areas. Some long -held properties at the node reflect a pattern of
low rents, high vacancies, and a lack of updates. Several properties at the node
have been sold, and the new owners have made substantial investments in these
properties. Where this has occurred, the new businesses are operating
successfully as owner - occupied and leased facilities. At the beginning of 2015,
only a small number of businesses are selling retail goods.
Please refer to Summary of Interviews with Property Owners and Tenants, in the
Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WW, to see the input that informed this section.
The Changing and Challenging Context for Commercial Uses in the Node
The node is often fondly remembered by long time Edina residents as a place
where kids rode bikes to the superette to buy gum and baseball cards and where
young people and families gathered for pizza or an ice cream treat. Additionally,
a clinic, pharmacy, service station, salon, barber shop, pizzeria and service
• station met the needs of area residents.
A variety of changes in the surrounding area have impacted the node since its
development in the late 1950s and 1960s, creating an increasing number of
challenges for Wooddale Valley View as a commercial node. They include:
• Reduced traffic flow on Valley View Road due to the elimination of direct
access between Valley View Road and Highway 100 that occurred when
Highway 100 was improved to operate as a controlled access roadway facility;
• Edina East High School relocated from its former location to one combined
campus west of Highway 100;
•
• A broad range of retail, medical, entertainment, banking, office and housing
options developed in the Southdale area;
• A healthy mix of grocery, hardware, banking, medical, dining and other goods
and services evolved in the Grandview area;
• Grocery, retail, personal services, banking, dining, entertainment activity and
housing density have increased at the 50t" and France node;
• Parking requirements for commercial uses throughout the region and in Edina
have increased gradually and significantly, making it difficult to provide today's
tenants with parking amenities that can compete with larger sites nearby;
• Many aging commercial buildings are reaching the end of their lifecycle.
20 1 Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
3.2 Trends and Challenges
In a sense, it's true that the very attributes that give the Study Area its unique
character and charm are the characteristics that are limiting competitiveness.
Aging Commercial Spaces. Aging commercial buildings on the smaller sites
nestled in the Wooddale Valley View node struggle to compete with more
recently built commercial spaces in surrounding areas. Commercial buildings at
Southdale, Grandview, and 50th and France, for example, succeed by offering
newer, larger, more convenient, and more visible sites — while property owners
at older nodes like Wooddale Valley View find it a struggle to cover maintenance,
let alone reinvest in larger scale upgrades or amenities.
Unique Commercial Sites. Factors such as property size, shape, and topography
further contribute to an awkwardness of many of the sites for use as commercial
properties. Access and parking issues make them comparatively less attractive to
conventional businesses that require larger, auto - oriented formats more
convenient to drivers. Because Valley View Road cuts through at an angle to the
north -south street grid, many properties in the study area are small and uniquely
shaped, with many placed on sharply angled corners within small blocks, making
• automobile access and parking configurations difficult to design. In addition,
steeply sloping topography limits the viability of commercial development on the
south side of Valley View Road within the study area.
•
9-all
Parcel Lines and Aerial Image from Hennepin County Propertylnfo
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 21
• Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
Competitive Commercial Context. Intense competition exists within one to two
miles from regional centers (Southdale) and community centers (Grandview and
50th and France). These larger commercial areas present challenges for nearby
neighborhood commercial nodes. See Report on Demographic and Market Trends,
page 66, found in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV, for a definition of the
types of shopping centers.
Site Visibility, Traffic Count and Ease of Access. The strong competition mentioned
above from three neighboring commercial areas located nearby compounds the
negative effects of geographic isolation from the south and west by Highway 62 and
Highway 100. Traffic on France Avenue can be a barrier for pedestrians and
bicyclists to the east. Small lakes and large land masses for public /institutional use
including Pamela Park, Edina Community Center / Southview Middle School
complex, and the Edina Country Club, reduce household density in the area.
Visibility and access are primary considerations for retailers seeking to locate their
businesses. The success of a particular retail location is dependent, in part, upon
how easy it is for consumers to locate the business, distinguish the business from
competitors, include the business in other activities, and stop at the business
• during their daily commute. Several factors are taken into consideration based on
traffic counts and visibility when retailers select a site, including:
• Daily traffic volumes in the area;
• Proximity to public transportation;
• Accessibility for potential customers as well as delivery vehicles;
• Visibility of the store and business signage from surrounding roads;
• The sites proximity to other traffic generators.
Based on data sourced from the Minnesota Department of Transportation
(Mn /DOT), it appears that Valley View Road experiences an AADT (Annual Average
Daily Traffic) of 5,300 vehicle trips per day, while the AADT along Wooddale
Avenue is approximately 3,000 vehicle trips per day. This is low compared to other
commercial nodes. See Table 3A Comparable Traffic Counts.
Therefore, due to the comparatively limited accessibility and visibility of the Study
Area, the most likely retail uses to be drawn to the area will be neighborhood- and
convenience - oriented establishments that supply goods and services to
households nearby.
22 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
•
•
Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
..
r
Two -Way Daily
Traffic Volume
56th and Xerxes
.��.�
On On
Xerxes, Xerxes,
North of South of
56th 56th
9 500 9,500
s
..V �` , w`�i.F...;
.�
• , s �_=
}d
j `..` air �r i.
c <
R
Two -Way Daily Traffic Volume -
Wooddale Valley View (2013)
On
On Valley
On Valley
Wooddale,
View,
View,
North of
West of
East of
Valley
Wooddale
Wooddale
View
South of
3,200
5,900
7,900
Two -Way Daily Traffic Volume -
54th and Penn (2013)
On
On
On 44th, O
On 44th,
France, F
France, W
On 54th,
On 54th,
Penn,
Penn,
West of
East of
North of
South of
44th 4
44th
peon
Penn
54th
54th
7,200
8,600
3,200
5,800
Two -Way Daily Traffic Volume -
44th and France(2013)
On O
On O
On 44th, O
On 44th,
France, F
France, W
West of E
East of
North of S
South of
44th 4
44th
Table 3A
Comparable Traffic Counts
Wooddale Valley View Srnall Area Plan P a g e 1 23
0 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
•
3.3 Goals and Policies
Ultimately, market conditions and the vision of property owners, developers,
investors, businesses and the City will shape the future of the node as well as the
timing the redevelopment activity.
Today's Mood: Hopeful Uncertainty
Residents value the convenience of neighborhood retail and their relationships
with small business owners, but commercial activity at the node will depend
upon the vision of property owners and developers and their ability to find a
strategic business mix that meets the evolving needs and desires of area
residents in a market area that already provides a wealth of options within a one
to two mile radius.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to imagine the wide range of development
proposals involving commercial and residential development for the Wooddale
Valley View node that could come before the City over the next two decades.
Today, the mixed mood of uncertainty combined with hopefulness among
landowners, the business community, and residents translates to diverse
perspectives on what it will take to strengthen the area as a commercial node.
See the Project Archive at www.EdinaMN.gov /WW for a Summary of Property
and Business Owner Opinions and a list of issues identified by the community.
The following goals and policies are forged from a balanced synthesis of these
perspectives.
Goals for Economic Vitality
Neighborhood Hub. Cultivate the Wooddale Valley View node as a hub of
vitality with a mix of high quality neighborhood- serving businesses. Support
investments that encourage gathering, pedestrian activity and that reinforce
a "neighborhood feel ".
2. Short -term Revitalization. Support upgrades to existing properties through
improved tenant mix and image, better marketing and promotion.
3. Right -Sized Retail and Commercial Spaces. Encourage and support an
amount and range of spaces for businesses that is calibrated to the realities
of the market and trade area.
4. Long -Range Market Forces. Encourage redevelopment of aging commercial
properties and development of vacant land based on market forces.
24 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0 Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
Policies for Economic Vitality
The following policies provide both structure and flexibility for the evaluation of
proposals.
1. The City will encourage redevelopment that is driven by the private sector
that aligns with the principles, goals, policies and guidelines of this plan.
Development concepts and timing will be initiated by property owners,
developers and investors based on market conditions. Development
proposals will be evaluated using the direction provided in this Small Area
Plan and the Edina Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City, at its discretion, will strategically invest, and /or use established
financing tools, to support public realm improvements to encourage
redevelopment of the neighborhood commercial node, consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan and Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan.
3. The City will favor investments in neighborhood - serving retail, service
sector businesses, and neighborhood - oriented public spaces. Investments
in existing or new buildings that meet the needs of area residents and build a
• sense of community, identity and vitality should be favored.
4. The City will be supportive of formal or informal business and property
owner collaborations. This includes public- private alliances or organizations
seeking to strengthen the economic vitality of the node and its role in
building community.
is
5. The City will discuss options for the property it owns at Kellogg Avenue and
Valley View Road with adjacent landowners. Use property to leverage
development or other changes that will promote the guiding principles,
goals, policies and guidelines of the small area plan.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 25
. Chapter 3 - Economic Vitality
0
3.4 Implementation Steps
Table 3B
Implementation Steps for Economic Vitality
Action
Leads Time Frame
Convene Business Community and Property Owners.
Administration 2015
a. Review and discuss the implications of the market
Department /
analysis prepared as part of the Wooddale Valley View
Economic
Small Area Plan.
Development
b. Review and discuss the Wooddale Valley View Small
Area Plan. Identify any ideas that merit further
consideration or research. Work with the City to
prioritize and identify elements that could be moved
forward on the improvement calendar such as bike and
pedestrian improvements, lighting, boulevard; public
art installations.
c. Learn about how successful business and property
owners can work together to build economic vitality.
d. Learn about models for collaboration between the
business community and emerging neighborhood
associations or established resident groups.
e. Determine if there is an interest and willingness to
continue meeting and begin working together on the
strategy outlined in this plan. If so, achievable goals,
roles and responsibilities should be identified.
City -Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. Administration 2016
Discuss options for the City -owned property with adjacent Department /
landowners. Use property to leverage development or Economic
other changes that will promote the guiding principles, Development
goals, policies and guidelines of the small area plan.
26 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Land Use and
Community Design
Current Conditions 4.1
Trends and Challenges 4.2
Goals and Policies 4.3
Implementation Steps 4.4
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
4.1 Current Conditions
The 2014 pattern of land use in the Study Area is summarized by Figure 4.1 and
the related table. A detailed description of land use, buildings, major tenants
and property owners is presented in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV.
_
=Two Story Vertical Mixed Commercial - Office over Retail /Services
= One Story Commercial
= Multi- family Residential - Duplex /Apartments /Flats
• Figure 4.1
Pattern of Land Existing Properties: Building Types, Year Built and Current Land Uses in 2014
28 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Building
Type Y
Year Built C
Current Land Use (at end of 2014)
1954 R
Retail and service — former gasoline service station; presently unused
1956 M
Mixed use: small offices over clothing retailer and ice cream shop
1957 S
Service business -dry cleaning
1957 R
Retail and service - strip mall (Edina Village Market (EVM))
1959 R
Retail and service - addition to strip mall (EVM)
1959 S
Service business -salon
1960 R
Residential — apartment building with underground parking
1960* S
Small offices (ValleyWood)
1962 R
Residential — apartment building with underground parking
1963 R
Residential — apartment building with underground parking
1969 R
Residential — apartment building with underground parking
1969 O
Office— professional service business ( *recently updated)
1970 S
Service business— child day care
no bldg U
Undeveloped site — owned by the City
=Two Story Vertical Mixed Commercial - Office over Retail /Services
= One Story Commercial
= Multi- family Residential - Duplex /Apartments /Flats
• Figure 4.1
Pattern of Land Existing Properties: Building Types, Year Built and Current Land Uses in 2014
28 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
4.2 Trends and Challenges
Community input, real estate market conditions and existing physical conditions are
all drivers of the principles, goals and policies of this plan. The community
engagement process and results were outlined in Chapter Introduction. Real
estate market conditions and future trends are presented in detail in Chapterl
Demographic and Market Profile and Chapter 3 Economic Vitality. Below is a review
of physical conditions that also factor into land use and community design decision
making in the Study Area:
Aging Buildings. Most of the buildings in the Study Area are older and some have
not been as well maintained as perhaps they would have been under better market
conditions. The commercial buildings were created during an era when the business
environment and the traffic patterns were much different than they are today.
Buildings Set Back with Surface Parking. Many of the commercial buildings are set
back behind a parking area, separating shopfronts from the street. This can reduce
convenience for those arriving on foot, by bike or by transit, and creating a less
attractive and comfortable streetscape experience for pedestrians. Moving buildings
too far back (especially when cars are parked in front) can reduce the positive effects
• of spatial enclosure, expose customers to elements and discourage the casual strolling
often found in successful retail environments and popular gathering places.
Lack of Streetscape Investments. The appearance of the Study Area is diminished by
the lack of trees and green boulevards along the edges of Wooddale Avenue and Valley
View Road.
Traffic Patterns. There is quite a bit of traffic through the Study Area but much of it
consists of pass- through trips, especially at peak hours. When the intersection of Valley
View Road and Highway 100 was closed, access to businesses in the Study Area from
west of the highway and other locations was greatly diminished. In addition, Wooddale
Avenue does not intersect or cross Highway 62 south of the Study Area.
Scale and Shape of Parcels. The Study Area contains a range of unique parcels, many
with smaller sizes with irregular shapes. While this contributes to the node's unique
character, these conditions present site design challenges for redevelopment projects.
Relationship to Neighborhoods. The adjacent neighborhoods consist mostly of
single - family detached housing in good condition. There is little separation,
buffering or transition from the buildings of the Study Area to that housing.
Providing a proper transition from more active areas nto the neighborhood may
present challenges.
Terrain. South of the Study Area, the land slopes steeply down to ponds. This
creates accessibility and parking issues that make these sites less amenable to
• commercial uses, especially retail.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 29
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
•
4.3 Goals and Policies
The following is a policy framework that provides guidance to the public sector for future
decision making, staff review of development applications, municipal plan implementation
and community based initiatives. The following takes into account the opinions and values
of stakeholders, the parameters of previous planning and existing policies.
The Study Area will continue to evolve and become a mixture of housing and commercial
development guided by the demands of the market, property owners' decisions, the
policies and guidelines of this plan, and the Edina Comprehensive Plan. Though the
proportion of the Study Area devoted to housing will likely be greater than it was in 2014,
the exact pattern of land use over time will be determined by market forces. Current uses
of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners decide to make a change.
Land Use and Community Design Goals
1. Activation of the Core. Concentrate activity and neighborhood- serving commercial
businesses near the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Any
new buildings introduced at the four corners of the Wooddale Valley View
intersection should include street -level retail or gathering spaces that interact with
• the sidewalk and encourage pedestrian activity.
2. Building -to- Street Relationships. Ensure that ground -level frontages throughout
the node are carefully designed with public -to- private relationships that encourage
beauty, safety, informal interaction, walkability and a sense of place.
•
3. Graceful Transitions. Encourage the scale of buildings to transition from center to
edge of the Neighborhood Node, with the largest buildings located near the
intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, decreasing in scale toward
the surrounding single - family neighborhood. Ensure that redevelopment near single
family homes is designed sensitively.
4. Flexible Evolution of Land Uses. Allow existing land uses to evolve in response to
the market. Current uses of land may, of course, remain as they are until owners
decide to make a change: The commercial site north of Valley View Road and,
Oaklawn Avenue may evolve to housing. The Edina Village Market may redevelop
as a mix of housing and commercial. The sites east of Kellogg Avenue immediately
north of Valley View Road may evolve as either commercial or residential.
5. Drive - Through Formats. Discourage buildings with drive - through elements such as
gasoline stations and those with drive -up windows. They are inconsistent with the
guiding principles of this plan.
30 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
0
•
Policies for Land Use and Community Design
1. The City will introduce the Neighborhood Node (NN)* Future Land Use
Plan designation, as presented in this plan. The City will adopt this plan as
an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, and amend zoning and
related ordinances to align with this plan.
2. The City will review development applications of all future projects (within
the boundaries of the Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node) to
ensure compliance with the Neighborhood Node Development
Guidelines *. The guidelines include:
A. Building Height Limits Plan
B. Building Frontage Guidelines
C. Gathering Space Guidelines
D. Site - Specific Guidelines
E. General Guidelines (for the Entire Neighborhood Node)
*The Neighborhood Node (NN) boundaries, its description, and the Wooddale
Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are presented in the
following pages.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 31
0
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN)
This plan introduces Neighborhood Node (NN) as a new land use category specifically for use
within a portion of the Wooddale Valley View Study Area. Also see description and Table 4A.
At shown, at Wooddale Valley View it replaces the previous Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
designation that was established within this area in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan.
32 1 Page
N Neighborhood Node (NN).
High Density Residential (HDR). It is recommended that the
apartment building located at the southwest corner of
Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road, currently planned
HDR, be included in the Neighborhood Node classification on
the Preferred Land Use Plan, as shown above.
LDR Low Density Residential (LDR)
Low Density Attached Residential (LDAR)
LDA Open Space and Parks (OSP)
r
Public /Semi - Public (PSP)
No changes are recommended to these Land Use Plan
classifications from the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. They
are all located outside the boundary of the Study Area.
Figure 4.2
Preferred Land Use Plan
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Similar to the Neighborhood Commercial category, Neighborhood Node:
a Supports Neighborhood Serving Businesses. Encourages small- to
moderate -scale businesses that serve primarily the adjacent neighborhoods.
Primary land uses should be retail and services, offices, studios, and
institutional uses.
In addition, designation as Neighborhood Node provides:
® Predictability for Current Landowners. Supports current owners' efforts -to
invest in improvements their properties by providing a predictable planning
framework for the area.
• Flexibility for Redevelopment. Provides greater flexibility to the development
market by more explicitly encouraging the inclusion of needed housing.
• New Gathering Space / Placemaking. Encourages intentional integration of
landscaped open space and new formal public spaces.
• Protection of Community Values such as Scale, Walkability and Character. A set
of Development Guidelines protects the scale, walkability and character of the
existing area by regulating the relationship of buildings -to- streets and the
• transition of building heights from node -to- neighborhood.
Table 4A - Neighborhood Node Land Use Category (Also see Figure 4.2.)
Land Use Category
General Description
Development Guidelines
Density Guidelines
NN
In general, small- to
Building footprints generally less
Maximum residential
Neighborhood Node
moderate -scale
than 20,000 square feet (or less for
density up to 30 dwelling
commercial,
individual storefronts).
units per acre (du /acre).
residential or mixed
Parking is less prominent than
(Densities are further
use buildings serving
pedestrian features.
constrained by the
primarily the adjacent
parameters of the
neighborhood(s).
Encourage structured parking and
in Buildg Height Limits
in
open space linkages where feasible;
Plan*).
Primary uses
emphasize enhancement of the
encouraged are
pedestrian environment.
neighborhood- serving
Encourage development to comply
Maximum Floor Area
retail and services,
with the Wooddale Valley View
Ratio (FAR) per zoning
offices, studios,
Neighborhood Node Development
code.
institutional and
Guidelines *:
residential.
A. Building Height Limits Plan
B. Building Frontage Guidelines
C. Gathering Space Guidelines
D. Site - Specific Guidelines
E. General Guidelines
x The Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are found on the following pages.
0 Wooddale Valley View
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 33
•
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines
=�< A. Building Height Limits Plan
The building height limits for the Neighborhood Node are indicated in Figure 4.3.
W. dd..,,.N.Vvh- Generally:
Neighborhood Node
Development . Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley
Guidelines
View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36
feet. South of Valley View Road building heights maybe up to four stories,
not to exceed 48 feet.
• Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified
locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful
transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building
Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not
to exceed 24 feet.
Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan, on the following page, defines height
limits throughout the Neighborhood Node.
Figure 4.3b, also on the following page, depicts existing height limits so that
comparison can be made between current policy and what is proposed.
341 Page
Wooddale Valley View Small. Area Plan
•
0
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
7q Four Story Limit.
Up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet
Three Story Limit.
Up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet
Two Story Limit.
Up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet
e�Two Story Transition (36' Deep)*
Height Limit: Up to two stories, not to
exceed 24 feet (vertically) within the
specified 36 feet in horizontal distance
from property line.
Two Story Transition (6o' Deep)*
Heightlimit: Upto two stories, notto
exceed 24 feet (vertically) within the
specified 6o feet in horizontal distance
from property line.
*(These 'Transition'designations were created
to establish a graceful transition from
Neighborhood Node properties with three story
limits to immediately adjacent residential areas
outside the node.)
HOD-2 8 adiny Wght shag be detem**d by wgraed setbacks.
bN shay not exceed 2 stories or 24 bet whichever is less-
HOD -3 S.M.9 hetpht"be determined by eegvned setbacks.
bbd shas not exceed 3 stories or 36 feet whichever is Mss.
,%- ,'.t'.',' HOD-d Budding height shall be dekm*wd by regir+ed setbacks.
but shall not exceed 4 stories or 46 bet whichever is less.
Figure 4.3 -b
Existing Building Height Limits as Defined by
Building Height Overlay District (Source: Article XI,
Division 2, Building Height Overlay District, and
Appendix A of the Official Zoning Map.)
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 35
Figure 4.3
Building Height
Limits Plan
•
•
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
B. Building Frontage Guidelines
The location of a range of climatically- appropriate frontage types is depicted by
w..�d.�..n.yY.� Figure 4.4 and Figure 4.5. These guidelines do not address style or building
Nelghboftod Node
Development vernacular but will ensure streets that are lined with ground level features that
Guldellnes contribute to active, safe and walkable streets. Generally:
Building -to- Street Relationships. Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1 -F6
illustrates typical configurations of building to street (private -to- public)
relationships and describes their varying appropriate context. These
'Frontage Types' shown are based on successful historic precedents found in
many older multi -modal neighborhoods of Edina, including the Wooddale
Valley View Study Area, and throughout the Twin Cities and the Midwest.
Node -to- Neighborhood Transitions. The frontage types are keyed to their
appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node in Figure
4.5 Context Areas. The purpose of the map is to guide new development
toward ground level building design that maintains visually graceful and
walkable transitions from the more active areas to the quieter single - family
residential neighborhood streets.
Figures 4.4 and 4.5 on the following pages present the Building Frontage
Guidelines of Wooddale Valley View's Neighborhood Node Development
Guidelines.
361Page
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
0
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Conlfnunity Design
.- t.
T kJ
Storefront
Appropriate Context: This frontage type is for small retail or
service spaces fronting public spaces in Core areas.
Configuration: There may be an exterior entrance for each
leasable space, spaced relatively closely along the sidewalk.
Follow City of Edina guidelines for commercial storefronts for
glazing, setbacks, awnings, signage, lighting and for related
outdoor commercial uses such as sidewalk cafes.
Doorway (At- Grade)
Appropriate Context: This frontage type is for smaller
commercial spaces in commercial or mixed use buildings that
front a sidewalk. This is not to be used as a substitute for
Storefront, where Storefront is merited or preferred, in core
areas. The Doorway has less window space because the
interior use might be office rather than retail.
Configuration: The at -grade doorway may serve one or
multiple interior users. If set back W -12', a'door-court'
provides space for bike parking, seating and greenery.
..l
Appropriate Context: This frontage type 1s primarily for single
family row houses and multifamily buildingswidt units facing
thestreet. They provide a good transitional frontage condition
for buildings in between neighborhood and core areas.
Configuration: Exterior stairs access a sheltered or recessed
area large enough for a family to stand and wait for the door to
be unlocked, and for guests to stand back after ringing the
doorbell. Stairs facing the street provide asocial setting.
F1� Shared Entry
Appropriate Context: This frontage type is for apartment
buildings, This residential frontage may be also used in a
vertically mixed -use building that also features Storefront
frontage.
Configuration: There would be a single entrance to the
building with security features. Individual apartments would
have entry doors along central hallways. Buildings with this
—� condition may also feature the Stoop frontage for first -floor
units having direct access to the sidewalk.
Porch & Yard
Appropriate Context: This frontage is typically for residential
applications but can be found on commercial buildings,
especially in transitional areas between single family streets
and more commercial blocks.
Configuration: 7.5' clear zone allows porch to become
furrushable living space. Accessible entries should be accessed
from the front to the side of central stair, which should be
visible from the street.
Figure 4.4
Building Frontages F1 -F6
High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 37
Common Lawn
ti
Appropriate Context: Common Lawn describes
z
the predominant primary frontage condition
found throughout Edina's residential
neighborhood streets.
Configuration: See City of Edina's current
regulations governing setbacks and lot, yard and
- ---GJII'•
Ar
building placement of single family homes.
Figure 4.4
Building Frontages F1 -F6
High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 37
•
Chapter 4 Land Use and Community Design
oil
0,
..........
- - ---------- ------------ --- --------
IL -W. 6.1 st
------- - ---- - -- - - -- - --- ------------
P
........ !Oi
0!
W
............. •
.. :
NO FNN i ....
W. 62 nd
Neighborhood Node! --------
Boundary
ON 0111111111111i !MEN rN
I --------- Nei i 19
Storefronts (Fl)
Strongly Encouraged
Figure 4.5
Building Frontage Guidelines: Context Areas
38 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Preferred Frontages by Context Area
Node Transitional
Neighborhood
Storefront F1
EMEMEMON
EN discouraged
not permitted
Ono
mom a
Doorway F2
M
ME mom . . ... .
not permitted
MEME ■
NX
Stoop F3
E
r
discouraged
mom
IN EN
Shared Entry F4
I
discouraged
Porch F5
discourage!
Common Lawn F6
not permitted discouraged
Storefronts (Fl)
Strongly Encouraged
Figure 4.5
Building Frontage Guidelines: Context Areas
38 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
•
9
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
C. Gathering Space Guidelines
As redevelopment occurs overtime, small landscaped open spaces and a larger
Weedd.,. WI.y Vow public multi -use space should be introduced strategically throughout the
Neighorhood No en! de Neighborhood Node. These may soften the buildings, buffer views to surface
Guldellnes parking, provide transitions to nearby single - family housing, provide outdoor
gathering places and generally extend the green character of the neighborhood.
These spaces may be privately or publicly owned and maintained or owned and
maintained as part of a public - private partnership.
Multi -Use Gathering Space. A public multi -use space such as a plaza could be
incorporated into improvements or redevelopments proposed at these
locations:
• The City -owned property at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue
• The ValleyWood office site at the northeast of Wooddale Avenue and Valley
View Road intersection
• The Edina Village Market and /or the former gas station site on the northwest
corner of the Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road intersection
Figure 4.6 on the following page illustrates methods of incorporating gathering
space guidelines.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 39
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Figure 4.6: Concept Illustrating Gathering Space Guidelines
at the Northwest Corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road
1. Spatial Enclosure. Enclose and activate the space with taller buildings with
active ground level uses.
2. Holding the Street. Bring (cozy) all buildings up close to the public space or the
street.
3. Protection From Elements. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces
to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of
buildings. Encourage deep awnings along all shopfronts.
4. Programming. Program the space with annual, seasonal and weekly events to
activate the space.
5. Flexibility. Maximize flexibility by using temporary or mobile event equipment,
and avoid encumbering the space with permanent vertical features.
6. Visual Interest and Identity. Anchor key visual points or defining and active
spots such as intersection corners with meaningful /interpretive public art, perhaps
doubling as rest /seating.
7. Universal Design. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all
spaces.
8. Accommodate Cyclists. Accommodate bicycles around the perimeter of the
• space with fewer steps, ample bike parking and safe access to bike lanes.
40 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
H" M.!. V. N, V'ry
NePghborhood Node
Development
Guidelines
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
D. Site - Specific (guidelines
The following guidelines apply to specific properties in the Neighborhood Node.
Figure 4.7
Key Map of Site- Specific Guidelines
Specific sites addressed:
Site A) Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road
Site B) Fairfax Avenue and West 611t Street (South Side)
Site C) City -owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road
Site D) "Eastern Gateway" - Valley View Road at Oaklawn Ave. and West 62 "d St.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 41
0
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Looking northwest toward the corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road.
Site A) Corner Properties of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road
This is the crossroads of the Pamela Park and Concord Neighborhoods and a key
location in the node. Therefore, private and public improvements at this location
should encourage activity, a sense of place, and a feeling of arrival. Accordingly:
a. Building Height and Mix of Uses. Locate taller buildings near this intersection,
possibly including vertically mixed -use structures.
b. Enclosure. Locate buildings close to the sidewalks. However a small plaza or
green space could be sited at the corner. See Gathering Space Guidelines.
c. Activity. Include prominent outdoor seating; public art or monuments can add
visual interest. As illustrated by Figure 4.6.
d. Ground Level Transparency. Connect commercial spaces to the streets with
storefronts with transparent windows. See Building Frontage Guidelines.
e. Streetscape Design. Incorporate decorative street lights, trees and sidewalks that
lead to this focal point. See Chapter 5: Transportation and Street Design.
Northwest Corner: Edina Village Market and the Former Wally's Station.
When the opportunity arises to redevelop the parcel at the northwest corner in
a significant way, the Neighborhood Node's Site Specific Guidelines (above) and
the Gathering Space Guidelines (as illustrated in Fig. 4.6) will be used as criteria
for review and approval of redevelopment proposals.
In the interim, the former Wally's building could be converted or enlarged for use
as one or more small businesses. A landscaped multi -use public space could be
created between the building and the intersection. Street -edge landscaping on this
private site could be improved, particularly if parking is created between the
building and the streets for the re- purposing of this building.
The Edina Village Market could receive better signage and perhaps a mural on the eastern
wall. The owner of the Edina Village Market (or ValleyWood office building) might be
persuaded to conduct a weekly outdoor market on a portion of their parking lot.
If reuse of Wally's proves difficult, eliminating the Wally's building prior to eventual
corner redevelopment would increase the visibility of Edina Village Market from the
intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road.
42 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Looking west on Fairfax Avenue from near the corner of Wooddale Avenue.
Site B. Fairfax Avenue and W. 61st Street (South Side)
• To establish a graceful transition from the node to the neighborhood streets to
the north:
a. Residential Uses Encouraged. As stated in the definition of Neighborhood
Node earlier in this plan, commercial uses are not prohibited within
properties with Neighborhood Node designation. Nevertheless, it is
recommended that development along the northern edge of the study area
include residential uses such as detached single - family houses and /or
rowhouses. Commercial uses in this area, if any, should be limited as much
as possible to the corners of Wooddale Avenue and have primary frontages
facing Wooddale Avenue.
b. Two Story 'Transition'. Within the Neighborhood Node, all new buildings
introduced along Fairfax Avenue and W. 615t Street must be limited to two
stories, not to exceed 24 feet in height, for a distance of 60 feet from the
property lines along those streets. See Figure 4.3 - Building Height Limits
Plan.
c. Compatible Frontages. New buildings introduced along these streets must
have frontages that complement the single - family housing to the north. See
Building Frontage Guidelines.
d. Street Trees. Trees should be maintained in the Fairfax Avenue and W. 61St
Street rights -of -way.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 1 43
•
•
Chapter 4 - Land. Use and Community Design
The site owned by the City at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue
Site C. The City -Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road
Because of its ownership by the City, size, configuration, and location near the eastern
end of the Study Area, the City -owned parcel is recognized as a unique and critical
property. (See Parcel A on Figure 4.8) Community members' opinions about its future
use in the Study Area were varied and included commercial, residential, mixed use, and
a public use consisting of a plaza /park /open space. Of primary importance to the
community is that any new development be carefully designed to respect the scale and
context of the single family homes northward along Kellogg, and that the success of
adjacent businesses are not negatively affected.
Leveraging the Property to Accomplish Plan Goals.
The City -owned property should be leveraged to
advance the principles, goals, policies and guidelines
of this plan. Optimizing the use of the City -owned
property (0.25 acres) will likely require assembling the
property with neighboring privately -owned parcels in
the future. At that time, the City will review the
merits of any development proposal for conformance
to this plan. Future uses could include residential
and /or commercial development, with possibility of
dedication of a portion of the site as a Gathering
Space (see Gathering Space Guidelines) or other
public space. During the interim period, the city -
owned land should continue to be maintained as
passively used and publicly accessible open space.
* Regarding the Long Range Use of
the Land as Public Space: Both the
Guiding Principles (in Section 1.5), and
the Land Use and Community Design
Goals (earlier in Section 4.3),
encourage the strengthening of the
intersection of Wooddale Avenue and
Valley View Road as the active center
Neighborhood Node. Land uses near
this location (such as the City —owned
site) that encourage economic activity,
public gathering and social interaction,
will be encouraged. Accordingly, the
long term exclusive use of the City -
owned property as a passive open
space is not encouraged.
Creating a Flexible Framework for Public— Private Collaboration. Previously the
City worked with major commercial property owners to facilitate new
development in the node, so somewhat greater flexibility in the planning for
parcels labeled A,B,C (as shown in Figure 4.8) was assumed in the small area
plan. Thus, the goals and policies stated earlier in this chapter, along with the
site specific guidelines on the following pages, were developed simply as a
guiding framework. Similar to all other sites in the node, there exists the
premise that land assembly and market forces should and will determine the
441Page
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
•
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
exact land use of any redevelopment. Figure 4.8 shows optional redevelopment
alternatives for the City -owned site are considered in this plan in the context of
various land assembly alternatives illustrated by Figure 4.8.
■ PropertyA Only (0.25 acres) - Capacity studies were not performed during the
planning process for Property A as a redevelopment site (by itself) due to size
constraints. It is conceivable that a small commercial or residential development
could be accommodated, but would likely require off -site shared parking.
® Properties A + B (0.40 acres combined) - This is alternative was studied during the
planning process. See Figures 4.8 - 4.10. The current land use on Property B is a
surface parking lot that is provided for patrons of the ValleyWood office building.
■ Properties A + B + C (0.55 acres combined) - This land assembly alternative, due to
its size, presents the most flexibility in terms of design alternatives. However, site
plan alternatives were not studied during the planning process because Property C
was outside of the Neighborhood Commercial boundary in the Comprehensive
Plan and, therefore, outside of the Study Area.*
i
�1 �0i k
k
r _
Figure 4.8
Property Ownership near City -Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 45
• Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Gauging Community Preferences. Three hypothetical site development scenarios
(site capacity studies) were presented to residents at the Progress Update Event on
December 3rd 2014, to spark discussion on the merits of different types of
development that could occur on the property. (See Figure 4.9). Each of the three
options assume that collaboration is possible with the owner of the parking lot parcel
to the north. Opinions of the neighborhood residents attending were exactly split
between support for the commercial (50 %) vs. residential concepts (50 %):
• Flex Commercial. (The favorite of 50% of participants.) The'Flex Commercial'
option includes one or more neighborhood - serving businesses in a one story
format. Preferred design guidelines for this option are shown in Figure 4.11.
• Rowhouses. (The favorite of 34% of participants.) The 'Rowhouses option
includes a diverse set of market rate attached single family homes with tuck -
under garages and elevated stoops.
• Manor (Flats /Apts). (The favorite of 17% of participants.) This option
included a multi -unit residential building with parking underneath.
If the market determines that commercial use is unsuitable, acceptable
alternatives to commercial use could be rowhouses or a small multi - family
• residential building using the Stoop (F3) or Shared Entry (F4) building frontage.
Other uses and design concepts are certainly possible.
Flex Commercial
Saufro PCct v', u, ,:,rr ll.. f ..,1..
Hlrilq
Pw, [ 24 �r, lla e .
Public Spec! Ilr..l,:r: •,1 :�lyu, -... J'.:.a. ,Tt
Psr[;col W. :,In l! rI::
.0 ,., Tn:r r•, ,L ::'•:1'1x..1. rl u::l.
1.1.•a tr'I.• :r�l: .lui 1'•.1 �.. .t.11`+w,. .. •v..
. ra r u.L+ +'�
F1 F2
Srrnra+l r.+, haucb, c.r rxmTMy •
Dr Pvrir +p Prd.4 rub;,fr :•
I 1:: -, I:.,A 1 —U, o1,41; 11,.;4 +C
11.1; .p
li :11]na+, ..J •: .r.h.r rd •.uAa.r o
teF•.b:.. :. �- -d�rl. •rt rr ra +'n•R <rn::.l
r +rn
WO I,I.r r• :'rw4 .:0'•.9ra:
Manor (Flats /Apt Building)
SOudll P[CI 1S V•: .2. ..t:W I..Ir,l: r •nr.n.r
14** h, tt•., u. <.1 Ir.r, r.rt .. r.. <. •.111x..1 1.4,..
p]•1 mj p.r•. +r •, 040 dln.
a I.eaJ r :.•1.r l,a�+ly rr... r,e:.t�r� , _` .lt
public spat! .r 11,
a:r .'r Jn.vn.vr n(
A.c "al UU v,
r r.,yn.,r r •n: .1
F4
3
Figure 4.9
Three Alternatives for Properties A +B: City -Owned Site (Property A) + ValleyWood Parking Lot (Property B)
Presented for Community Review at Community Meeting in November 2014
High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV
46 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
«t
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B'Flex Commercial' Alternative
Guidelines for the redevelopment of the City -owned site as "Flex Commercial"
alternative are as follows. Please also refer to Figure 4.10.
a. Shared Parking. Partially reconfigure parking to open up for shared use by
the new commercial spaces.
b. ®n- Street Parking. Retain head - -in parking along Kellogg Avenue.
c. Frontage. Storefront (F1) Frontage along Valley View Road.
d. Public (Gathering) Space. Increased set - back /chamfering at the southeast
corner allows for an expanded sidewalk seating area and /or fair weather
retail /merchandising space. It also allows for continued visibility to the small
shops on the northeast corner of Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road.
e. Service. Loading, solid waste and recycling bins accessed and handled off the
rear service lane, away from Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road.
f. Neighborhood - Serving Businesses. Initial tenants should include
neighborhood- serving commercial businesses.
ilk
l&F
wp_x�
Figure 4.10
Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A + B as "Flex Commercial"
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 47
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
Looking west toward the `Eastern Gateway' of the Wooddale Valley View node.
Site D. WVV's'Eastern Gateway' (Valley View Road at Oaklawn and W. 6211d St.)
The parcel located at 4400 Valley View Road has a particular advantage in being
perceived as the first commercial property when approaching from the east. It
forms a gateway into the Wooddale Valley View node. Currently a salon, it could
remain in commercial use or transition to residential use.
a. Orientation. As a commercial use, the building should maintain a primary
frontage oriented south toward Valley View Road and carefully screen its
parking from the housing to the north. As illustrated in Figure 4.11, if the
property becomes a residential use the building may face either south and /or
the east, whichever is more advantageous for buffering the building's parking
from the housing to the north.
b. Gentle Transition from Node to Neighborhood. Whether the site is used for
commercial or residential development, landscaping, screening and building
height should be designed to help the building serve as an end cap for the
residential block next to Valley View Road. * The building height limit in this
location is two stories. See Figure 4.3 — Building Height Limit Plan.
c. Gateway Public Art. There is space in the property and street right -of -way in
front of this site to accommodate some form of vertical public art, banner
pole or similar monument that will establish a sense of entry. This would be
experienced as you approach from the east along Valley View or 62nd Street
and from the north on Oaklawn.
d. Architectural Vernacular. This plan does not attempt to prescribe the style
or architectural vernacular of the building, that is, the exterior materials,
window proportions or detailing. Only the height and relationship of
buildings to the street are specified. It is not intended that a row house
building must look like the one shown by Figure 4.11.*
Conceptual Illustration of Guidelines. Figure 4.11 below illustrates one example
in which a row house building would be configured following the guidelines
Mabove. This two story design faces east, with stoops facing the street, parking
48 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
•
Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
tucked under the building, a small embedded commercial space fronting the
sidewalk on Valley View Road, and a public art entry monument at the corner
that terminates three vistas.
Wooddale - Valley View Neighbarhood Commercial Node 2030 Scenarios
DESIGN STUDY: 1J' VV'S East Gateway (Valley View @ Oak Lawn & 62nd
Figure 4.11
Example of a Rowhouse Configured to Follow Site- Specific Guidelines
Presented for Community Review at Community Progress Update in November of 2014
High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 49
0 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
E. General Guidelines for the Entire Neighborhood Node
w.�.n.,v.. On -Site Parking and Site Access
Neighborhood Node
Development . Encourage Underground Parking. Residents' parking should be located
Guidelines
under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions.
• Visually Buffer Surface Parking Lots. Commercial parking should be behind
or along -side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to
encourage an active streetscape.
• Display Consistent Signage: Signage pylons, window display signs, and on-
site directional signage should be consistent in terms of colors and materials.
Signage should clearly mark site access and direction for automobile and
bicycle access from streets.
• Install Edge Treatments along Surface Parking Lots: Edge treatments along
the borders between private surface parking lots and the adjacent sidewalks
should include a planting strip approximately two feet wide (or more) and
permanent planting or fencing approximately three feet high. (Following City
standards where applicable.)
• • Construct Organized Parking Lots: Surface parking lots should be
constructed to adhere to City of Edina standards regarding stall width and
length and aisle width. Pedestrian- oriented lighting should be installed on
islands within surface parking lots. Where applicable, clearly defined
pedestrian paths should be marked so that pedestrians can safely walk
between the parking lot and on -site buildings.
C
Other Improvements
As properties redevelop, the City may require investment in on -site or public facilities
that complement new projects, such as:
• Bicycle Parking. Bicycle parking facilities located close to the front doors of
businesses.
• On -Site Lighting. On -site pedestrian- oriented lighting.
• Interpretive Monuments and Public Art. Entry monuments, which can serve
as gateways, should be installed at strategic locations within the Study Area.
The monuments could be local or regional historical markers, memorials or
public art installations. Strategic locations that might serve to mark
progression through or arrival in the node include, but are not limited to, the
corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View, the intersection of 62nd Street
and Valley View Road, the intersection of 62nd Street Oaklawn Avenue and
Valley View Road.
50 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
. Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
•
•
Heritage Preservation
Community members including residents, business owners, and property
owners, felt that the Study Area's history should be further understood,
celebrated, and if possible, incorporated as one of many organizing principles
around which future development and public realm improvements should occur.
59
75330
M5090
E -dins Historical Society collection
unnr.�nr arim5nmtnrtr._al_ mc'pty nrn
• Individual Sites and Buildings. While the Study Area is located in a city rich
with history, it may be likely that no single site or structure within the
boundaries of the Study Area would meet the typical criteria for local
designation or for nomination to the National Register of Historic Places.
Many of the buildings are just now reaching the age requirement, and a
cursory survey by the Consultant Team found that few if any of the buildings
may possess (or have retained) the architectural or historic characteristics
typically required for local or national designation. To adequately verify this
cursory finding, a more thorough investigation such as a Historic Resources
Survey would be necessary.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 51
• Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design
4.4 Implementation Steps
Table 4B
Implementation Actions for Land Use and Community Design
Action
Leads Anticipated
Time Frame
Incorporate this Plan by Reference.
Upon Adoption
The City will adopt the Wooddale at Valley View Small Area Plan
Comprehensive
into the Edina Comprehensive Plan by reference, giving it
authority equal to the balance of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning Regulations and Map.
For the area defined in this plan as Neighborhood Node, this
plan overrides the following:
Community
• 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan's Figure 4.3, Future Land
Development
Use Plan along with Tables 4.2 and 4.3.
Department
• 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan's Figure 4.6A; to amend
the building height limitation for the Study Area consistent
• The PCD -4 district allows automobile service centers, car
with the policies of this plan.
Policies and guidelines regarding the Study Area in the next
2018
update of the Comprehensive Plan will be adjusted to reflect this
Comprehensive
plan.
Plan Update
Zoning Regulations and Map.
The City will amend the Zoning Map to replace the two sites
2015/2016
zoned Planned Commercial District -4 with the Planned
Commercial District -1 designation.
• The PCD -4 district allows automobile service centers, car
washes and gasoline stations.
Community
• The PCD -1 district allows certain retail or service businesses
Development
as Permitted Uses and multiple - family housing as
Department
Conditional Uses.
The City will use the policies and guidance of this plan as the
conditions of review for proposed multiple - family housing.
The City will amend the zoning ordinance regarding height
2015/2016
maximums to be consistent with this plan.
Application Reviews.
Community
Ongoing
City staff and Officials will use this plan when reviewing
Development
applications. for land development or zoning amendments in the
Department;
Study Area.
City Planning
Commission
and Council
•
52 1 Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Transportation and
Street Design
Current Conditions
Trends and Challenges
Goals and Policies
Implementation Steps
•
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
5.1 Current Conditions
Image from Bing Maps, 2015
Jurisdiction of Roadways
. Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street are under City of Edina
jurisdiction and are designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. This
designation is afforded to streets that link regional roads. Therefore, the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) has an interest in their
design, operation, and maintenance. Mn /DOT design standards must be followed
when considering improvements to Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and
62nd Street, and deviations must be approved before they can be implemented.
•
Functional Classification of Roadways
Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Street are functionally classified
as collector streets. This is particularly important for Valley View Road, which
operates as an east /west connector corridor. Its location within the City (south of
50th Street and north of Highway 62 and with linkages to Highway 100 and
France Avenue) position it to carry through traffic, which does not have a trip
end (origin or destination) in the Small Area Plan Study Area. Atthe same time,
Valley View Road is lined with residences and neighborhood- oriented businesses,
and some of its traffic is, therefore, local traffic.
54 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
•
•
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
Wooddale Avenue
As shown in the Figure 5.1, the typical condition of Wooddale Avenue north of
Valley View Road is 31 feet -wide from face of curb -to -face of curb and is
constructed within 66 feet of public right -of -way. It exists today as a two lane
street between Fairfax Avenue and Garrison Lane. A five foot -wide sidewalk is
located along the east side of Wooddale in the segment between Fairfax Avenue
and Valley View Road. There is no sidewalk on the west side of Wooddale
Avenue within this segment. ,
Bicycles are accommodated on Wooddale
Avenue, north of Valley View Road, with �� •
sharrows (shared lane markings). Within each
existing 14 foot -wide lane, the effective width
Chevrons are painted in street to indicate a
of roadway for cyclists is approximately six feet "sharrow" or a "share the road" condition.
wide in both directions.
Private properties are located outside the public right -of -way on both the west
and east sides of Wooddale Avenue. The Edina Village Market is located on the
west side of Wooddale Avenue, and the ValleyWood office building is on the east
side. The right -of -way on the west side of Wooddale Avenue includes several
curb cuts, with trees planted in grassy areas between driveways. On the east
side, the surface parking lot for the ValleyWood office building actually
encroaches into the public right -of -way by about twelve feet.
Wooddale Avenue
Existing [: ondition (Typical)
This cross - section is north of Valley View, looking north.
i 31' i
j curb face -to -curb face j
1 r.
1 1
Edina YdtW YatkylC'wad
Market / ibmier 46' ol office Builcfing
R`a}ly's R=t location cf ezisting p mperty li acs to be cefificd.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Figure 5.1
Wooddale Avenue Existing Conditions
Page 1 55
•
0
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
Own!,
Valley View Road, west of Wooddale Avenue, looking west.
Valley View Road
The overall right -of -way width of Valley View Road is 66 feet between property
lines on the west side of Wooddale Avenue. Within the right -of -way are two
travel lanes, each 17 feet wide, and one five foot -wide sidewalk on the south
side of the street. There is no sidewalk on the north side of Valley View Road in
this segment. Outside the right -of -way, west of Wooddale Avenue, is the Edina
Village Market on the north side of Valley View Road and an apartment building
on the south side of the street. As shown on the typical section, the Edina
Village Market has been built on a rise that is about 12 feet higher than Valley
View Road at the western property line of the Edina Village Market.
This segment of Valley View Road to the west of the intersection with Wooddale
Avenue was studied because of its relationship to the Edina Village Market and,
additionally, because it is a comparatively older roadway segment than Valley
View Road east of the intersection.
Valley View Road
l'.?:iytlil;ry �..er!10EFE4Y�►li j..l�°I`i�l &:�.I
'This cross - section is west of Wooddale, looking west.
37' - - -- _ r
curb face -to -curb face
I
j 1 t
.. _g� ..... g�..l _ .......... Fp..........- _.... _ -p'.. ...
Enact location of e%isring property lines ro be redfied.
l Edina N7ilinge \Tacker
Parlcuig Lot
Figure 5.2
Valley View Road Existing Conditions
56 1 Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
•
62nd Street
Sixty- second (62nd) Street is an east /west MSA street (and regional route) that
links two other regional routes, Valley View Road and France Avenue. It also
provides direct access to residences.
The configuration of its intersection with Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road
is not desirable because:
• Inadequate Spacing of Intersections. The intersection of Oaklawn Avenue
and 62nd Street is only 50 feet from the intersection of 62nd Street and
Valley View Road.
• Storage Distance. The storage (stacking) distance for southbound vehicles
on 62nd Street approaching Valley View Road is less than 20 feet long.
• Approach. The curvilinear alignment of 62nd Street, as it approaches
Oaklawn Avenue from the east, encourages drivers to enter the curve at
higher than desirable speeds.
• Lack of Traffic Control Device. There is no traffic control device to regulate
the flow (or speed) of westbound traffic on 62nd Street as it approaches
• Oaklawn Avenue from the east.
•
li ^�
�h
Intersection Oaklawn, 62nd Street, and Valley
View Road.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 57
4 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
�J
5.2 Trends and Challenges
Traffic Control and Safety
Regional and Sub - Regional (or Through) Traffic versus Local Traffic. The
majority of traffic on Study Area streets is likely regional and sub - regional traffic
that passes through the area. This traffic is defined as having a trip origin and
trip destination outside the Study Area. Today, the design of streets and
intersections is more oriented toward serving regional traffic than local traffic,
even though a significant percentage of traffic in the Study Area is local traffic
with one or more trip end in the Study Area.
Daily Traffic Volumes. Traffic within the Study Area is forecast to grow. Daily
traffic actually decreased between 1999 and 2005 but increased between 2005
and 2013. The percentage of growth in daily traffic has historically been higher
on Valley View Road compared to Wooddale Avenue. This trend is expected to
continue in the future where daily traffic on Wooddale Avenue is forecast to
increase from 3,200 (in 2013) to 3,500 (in 2030), a nine percent increase. During
this same period, daily traffic on Valley View Road, east of Wooddale Avenue, is
forecast to increase from 7,900 (in 2013) to 11,000 (in 2030), a 39 percent
increase.
Table 5A: Historical and Forecast Daily Traffic Volumes
Year
Two -Way Daily Traffic Volume
On Wooddale, North
of Valley View
On Valley View,
West of Wooddale
On Valley View,
East of Wooddale
1999*
4100
6400
9400
2005*
3050
5000
7900
2013*
3200
5900
7900
2030 **
3500
T Not Provided
11000
* Mn /DOT MSA Street Series Mapping
** City of 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan
The Roadway Design Challenge. A roadway system that accommodates all users
is what is desired in the Study Area. The challenge is to coordinate any design
improvements for Wooddale Avenue, Valley View Road, and 62nd Streetto
ensure that all modes of transportation are integrated. As learned during the
planning process, the City and its residents are interested in seeing the Study
Area become more friendly to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit riders.
58 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
0
Parking
Parking Supply Currently Exceeds Demand. The supply of parking at the two
commercial /retail centers in the Study Area (Edina Village Market on the
northwest corner of the Wooddale Valley View intersection and ValleyWood
Center on the northeast corner) currently outstrips parking demand most of the
time. This situation could change in the future as redevelopment and
development occur and parking generation associated with new uses increases.
Parking Takes Up Space. Each parking stall requires a minimum of 162 square
feet, and, with the addition of 24 foot -wide drive aisles, an average of 350 square
feet is required for each parked car.
Parking is Expensive. The cost of constructing a single parking stall in a surface
lot is between $6,000 and $7,000 in 2015. Parking structures and parking
garages, with additional costs for supporting structures and excavation, can be
four times to seven times more expensive than surface lots. As is obvious, the
provision of on -site parking can impact project development economics and
bears on the amount of usable space that can ultimately be constructed.
The Parking Challenge. Parking supply and configuration can impact
. development potential. Of concern would be development and redevelopment
economics. There is a balance that should be considered during the
development review and approval process where the size of a development is
weighed against the supply of parking that is required.
•
Site Access
Excessive Driveways. The Study Area for the Wooddale Valley View Small Area
Plan has 16 access driveways in the immediate vicinity of the key intersection.
Numerous access driveways can make it more convenient for cars to enter and
exit private properties. At the same time, each driveway introduces a conflict
point along the roadway network, and it is at conflict points where crashes occur.
Pedestrian and bicycle circulation is impeded by driveways where cars can enter
and leave a site.
The Accessibility Challenge. As redevelopment and development occur over
time, the proper number of driveways should be required. The number of
driveways can be reduced through strategies where adjacent property owners
share a driveway.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 59
• Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
0
Walking, Biking and Access to Transit
The Study Area lacks a consistent provision of facilities that would encourage and
support safe and convenient reliance on alternative travel modes. Lacking are
sidewalks for walking, dedicated bikeways for biking, and comfortable and
properly located transit shelters for riding the bus.
Lack of Sidewalks. Sidewalks are not provided within the Study Area on:
• the west side of Wooddale Avenue, north of Valley View Road,
• neither the west nor east side of Wooddale Avenue, south of Valley View Road,
• the north side of Valley View Road, west of Wooddale Avenue.
Lack of Marked Crosswalks. There are only two marked pedestrian crosswalks
(instead of four) at the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road.
Lack of Pedestrian- Oriented Street Lighting. Pedestrian - oriented street lighting
is provided along Valley View Road east of Wooddale Avenue. Consistent
lighting provided throughout the entire Study Area could greatly increase the
sense of safety and walkability after sunset.
Lack of Dedicated Bikeways. Dedicated bikeways are needed on Valley View
Road, west of Wooddale Avenue.
Lack of Tree - Planted Boulevards. Boulevards with a consistent canopy of
planted trees between sidewalks and the streets enhance walkability by
providing:
• protection from the elements,
• buffering etween pedestrian and vehicles,
• beauty.
Lack of Comfortable Transit Facilities. Existing transit facilities are bus stops
(without shelters) that are too close to the street and without pedestrian
pathways for access to /from them. Providing improved, comfortable and
climate - protected transit shelters, that are positioned in safe locations, will
encourage more people to use transit.
The Alternative Mode Challenge. The challenge is to fit sidewalks, marked
crosswalks, pedestrian- oriented lighting, dedicated bikeways, planted
boulevards, and improved transit facilities into the existing public right -of -way
and /orto ensure that as redevelopment and development occurs these facilities
are included in approved design plans. A related challenge isto ensure that
facilities that encourage and support alternative travel modes are located so as
to make travel to /from key destinations in the Study Area safe and convenient. A
final challenge is to determine the timing for implementation of improvements.
60 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
• Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
5.3 Goals and Policies
Transportation goals and policies for the Wooddale /Valley View Small Area Plan
are consistent with transportation objectives identified in the City of Edina
Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the City's Living Streets Policy, which is
awaiting adoption as of February 24, 2015. They also address specific issues
raised in the community
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan. As stated in the Comprehensive Plan,
"There is a fundamental link between transportation planning and land use
planning. Successful land use planning cannot take place without taking
transportation considerations into account. Conversely, transportation planning
is driven by the need to support existing and future land uses which the
community supports and /or anticipates." Transportation goals developed for
the Small Area Plan recognize this fundamental linkage and are aimed at
ensuring safe and convenient travel through and within the Study Area.
Consistency with Living Streets Principles. According to the Edina Living Streets
Policy, streets in Edina should "balancethe needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians
and transit riders in ways that promotesafety and convenience, enhance community
• identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide
meaningful opportunities for active living and better health."
0
The Living Streets Policy envisions Edina as a place where:
• Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;
• Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;
• Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;
• Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and
physical activity;
• Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced
infrastructure investments;
• Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are
pursued in publicand private sectors alike; and
• Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land
uses.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 61
• Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
•
Goals for Transportation and Street Design
1. Automobile Traffic. Ensure safe and convenient travel for traffic passing
through and within the Study Area by:
• Reducing lane widths
• Implementing intersection improvements at problem locations
• Limiting the number of driveways providing access between the roadway
system and private property
• Vigorously enforcing traffic laws and regulations
2. Parking. Ensure adequate parking supplies that:
• Are located on -site in accordance with specific land uses
• Meet multi -modal parking needs
• Are safe and secure
3. Walking, Biking and Transit. Design public rights -of -way to facilitate and
encourage safe and convenient multi -modal travel by providing:
• Sidewalks, boulevards, marked crosswalks, and pedestrian- oriented
street lighting within the Study Area .
• Dedicated bikeways within the Study Area
• Connectivity for pedestrians and cyclists to surrounding neighborhoods
and destinations
• Transit stops
Policies for Transportation and Street Design
1. The City will coordinate with Mn /DOT on traffic improvements to Municipal
State Aid (MSA) Streets_ Recognizing that Valley View Road and 62,d Street are
MSA streets, the City will coordinate with Mn /DOT on the design and
implementation of public improvements within the rights -of -way of these two
streets. Improvements should include:
Travel Lane Width and Bikeways on Valley View Road. Study the feasibility
of reducing the width of travel lanes on Valley View Road, west of Wooddale
Avenue, to 11 feet, as shown on Figure 5.3. (As shown on Figure 5.2, existing
lane widths on Valley View Road are 17 feet in each direction.) By reducing
the width of lanes on Valley View Road, traffic will be forced to drive a
comparatively slower speeds and more cautiously than it does with wider
lanes. The reduction in lane widths will also allow the introduction of
dedicated bike lanes or sharrow markings on Valley View Road.
62 1 Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
0
•
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
:1 1 4�
r�
saucgs aanP 01 Duo i
:MAU A3UU 130 -'P!s c
gpou &w nq oiiun3 s ;
...._.._.e._.. iv ......
lei
°—
KU LK.
O c�
4.
LSJ "n -0
u � o
.� .. .uO c
U r0i .rl t 0
00 0
La 0
a
:d O
�L J
i Y 1
7. ^ '�
71 ----- -7 F-1 I
7 h
Q
•s
w
R.
a
A
V ;l
y
y
• Figure 5.3
Valley View Road Illustrative of Long -Range Policy
WooddaIe Valley View Small Area Plan P a g e 1 63
•
•
•
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
Intersection Improvements at 62nd, Oaklawn
and Valley View. Study the feasibility of
improving the intersection of 62nd Street,
Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road to reduce
conflicts between northbound left- turning
vehicles and westbound south - turning vehicles.
An example of how this intersection might be
improved is shown in Figure 5.4, which illustrates
the elimination of a direct connection between
1 PA.
O �y. i
62W st
Oaklawn Avenue and Valley View Road. It also Figure 5.4: Alternative #3 of 3; Oaklawn, 62nd
shows a remnant parcel that would be created and Valley View Intersection Study. This alternative
and an existing pedestrian linkage that would be shows the elimination of a direct connection from
Oaklawn Avenue to Valley View Road. Full study
maintained.. found in the Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov /WVV.
2. The City will work to improve safety throughout the Study Area.
• Reduction of Driveways: Where feasible, as future development occurs,
encourage the sharing of driveways across property lines and ensure that
future developments are only allowed the minimum number of driveways
necessary to provide convenient and safe ingress and egress.
• Enforcement: Increase enforcement of existing traffic safety laws (e.g.,
speed, tailgating, coming to a complete stop at Stop signs, yielding to
pedestrians, etc.) to improve safety.
3. The City will work to ensure appropriate configuration, size and location of
parking supplies. Current parking supplies at the Edina Village Market and the
ValleyWood Center typically exceed current parking demand. Recognizing that
this may change in the future as development occurs, the following parking-
related policies should be adopted.
• Commercial Parking: Commercial parking should be behind or along -side the
buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active
streetscape.
• Residential Parking: Residential parking should be located under the
buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions.
• Flexible Parking Ratios: Parking ratios that reflect residents' increasing use of
transit service should be applied to new residential developments.
• Pedestrian and Bike Amenities. All parking lots should include clearly identified
pedestrian pathways between the parking lot and building entrances. Parking
lots should also include parking facilities for bikes that are Located near
entrances in order to give cyclists a competitive advantage over drivers.
641Page
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
Chapter 5 - rransportation. and Street Design
.0 60
°o
0
-;)ajlp 01 allo
:SWUR .13 n
I!tlq Ojmj
. ..........
a r.
A
-------------
. . . . . . . . . . . .
to W
Cd tz
- - - --------
;>
to
4. U
C) rJ
>
*-I
•(U
J
-------------- -------
....... ......
S21301S amp 01 3uO
22UTPF(l O"LITIJ
_zt 0,
0 0
N
Lei tG
Figure 5.5
Wooddale Avenue Illustrative of Long-Range Policy
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
Page 1 65
0 Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
4. The City will work to ensure adequate facilities for walking, biking and
transit use. Providing facilities for pedestrians, transit riders and cyclists that
offer sufficient levels of comfort, convenience and safety will make it easier and
more practical for alternative travel modes to be used. Where necessary, the
City will need to coordinate with Mn /DOT or other agencies such as Metro
Transit to implement the following improvements. In some cases the City and
property owners will be able to act alone.
The public improvements described below are illustrated in Figures 5.3 and 5.5,
which are both illustrative cross - sections of Wooddale Avenue (north of Valley
View Road) and Valley View Road (west of Wooddale Avenue). These section
should to be compared Figures 5.1 and 5.2, which show existing conditions in the
same locations. Figure 5.6 - Public Realm Improvements shows the location of
the following improvements in the Study Area:
• Crosswalks. Complete the crosswalks at the intersection of Wooddale
Avenue and Valley View Road, connecting all four corners.
• Sidewalks along Wooddale Avenue. Construct a new sidewalk and tree -
planted boulevard on the west side of Wooddale Avenue between Fairfax
• Avenue and Valley View Road. Construct a sidewalk on either the west or
east side of Wooddale Avenue (or both sides), south of Valley View Road,
consistent with the installation of pedestrian - scaled street lighting.
•
• Install Pedestrian - Scaled Street Lighting. Pedestrian - oriented street lighting has
been installed along Valley View Road, east of Wooddale Avenue. Install new
pedestrian - scaled street lighting within the Study Area consistently throughout
the entire node. Extend lighting to a point on Wooddale 150 feet south of Valley
View Road (approximately one -half block).
• Construct a Sidewalk along Valley View Road. Construct a new sidewalk and
boulevard on the north side of Valley View Road between Wooddale Avenue
and St. Johns Avenue and further west as appropriate.
• Provide Bus Shelters. Coordinate with Metro Transit and adjacent property
owners to provide bus shelters that will protect transit riders from inclement
weather at the locations with the Study Area where passengers board and
alight Routes 6B, 6U, and 587.
• Construct Boulevards. Boulevards should be developed along the east and
west sides of Wooddale Avenue between the sidewalks and the curbs.
• Plant Boulevards. Boulevards within the Study Area should be planted with
a variety of trees that grow to a height of less than 30 feet.
• Bicycle Lanes: Construct a pair of bicycle lanes on Valley View Road between
Wooddale Avenue and St. Johns Avenue and further west as appropriate.
66 1 P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan
•
•
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
5. The City will employ Living Streets principles and other established best
practices in all improvements. The Small Area Plan process, and this Small Area
Plan document does not set specific performance standards for public realm
improvements. Upon any improvement, a formal design process will be
necessary that ensures the use of best practices in regards to established
practice in the community such as:
• Community aesthetic or thematic preferences;
• Sustainable materials;
• Energy conservation and carbon reduction goals;
• District stormwater management;
• City of Edina's Living Streets principles and policies;
• Safe Routes to School (SRTS) principles and policies.
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 67
W
I,
® r ', ■
3
• rp
61 st
rem no
■ •`•• • J ko
•
t °
•�'•. .. • P �,
Study Area
62nd W. 62 nd
't .
1-4
L;
■
on Lane -.
Ila D
y 1b .....
C
Chapter 5 - Transportation and Street Design
5.4 Implementation Steps
Table 56 - Implementation Steps for Transportation and Street Design
Action Leads Time Frame
Install and maintain crosswalks Engineering Department 2015
Provide bus shelters Community Development 2016
Department, Metro Transit,
property owners
Study addition of bicycle lanes on Valley View Engineering Department
Road
Study addition of sidewalk on north side of
Valley View Road
Engineering Department
Study addition of sidewalk on west side of
Wooddale Avenue
Engineering Department
Study installation of street lighting on Valley
View Road and Wooddale Avenue
Engineering Department
Study construction of boulevards
Engineering Department
Investigate travel lane width reductions on
Engineering Department
City to consider with
future CIP planning as
budgets and priorities
allow
Valley View Road
• Study intersection improvements at Valley
Engineering Department
2018
View /62nd /Oaklawn intersection. Implement
related Valley View Road improvements
within period specified in CIP.
Consolidate or otherwise reduce number of
Community Development and
As redevelopment
driveways
Engineering
occurs
Implement policy regarding commercial
Community Development
When Comprehensive
parking
Department
Plan is updated
Implement policy regarding residential
Community Development
When Comprehensive
parking
Department
Plan is updated
Develop policy on flexible parking ratios
Community Development
When Comprehensive
Plan is updated
Update City of Edina Sidewalk Plan
Community Development and
When Comprehensive
Engineering
Plan is updated
Increase enforcement within the Study Area
Police Department
Ongoing
0
Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 1 69
w9�NA,
C e:. 0 Cn
;A o
• Y71jI'C>Rf''t�v
1888
To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: VIII. A.
From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Action
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Special Permit to Use City Property — 50th And France Business Association - June
5-7,2015
Action Requested:
Approve the use of City property in conjunction with the 50th and France Business Association.
Information / Background:
50th and France Business Association has applied for a Special Permit for the use of city property permit in
the Edina 5 -0 parking lot for the 50th and France Art Fair event, June 5 -7, 2015. Proposed alcohol service
will be: Friday and Saturday from I I a.m. until 6:30 p.m. and on Sunday from I I a.m. until 4:30 p.m. Alcohol
service will be provided by Edina Grill via their State Alcohol Catering License. It has been several years
since the Art Fair ran a beer garden. The Association thought that with the Edina Grill catering the alcohol
service, the 50th & France Association would find it financially feasible to make this part of the Art Fair once
again.
As required by City Code Section 24 -346, the Association has submitted the required application, paid their
fee and provided the following: insurance certificate, signed an indemnification agreement with the City, site
plan of the beer garden and beer garden proposed signage. In addition, Edina Grill has supplied a copy of
their State Alcohol Catering license and also provided their liquor liability insurance. One item remaining
that will be required is to have either a $5,000.00 cash deposit, letter of credit or a surety bond. The
Association will be making the cash deposit nearer to the Art Fair.
have attached the narrative from the 50th and France Business Association explaining their proposed
operating plan for the Beer Garden during the 2015 Art Fair.
Staff recommends approval of the special permit to use city property as requested.
Attachments:
50th & France Edina Grill Craft Beer Garden Operating Plan
Site Plan of Edina 5 -0 Parking Lot Depicting Location of Beer Garden
Proposed Signage For Beer Garden
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
0
ri ff1
Edina Art Fair
Edina Grill Craft Beer Garden
Located in the Edina 50 surface parking lot at 50"' and France. The microbrew hours will be as follows:
Friday, 11am- 6:30pm
Saturday, 11am- 6:30pm
Sunday, 11am- 4:30pm
The microbrew garden will have fencing around the beer tent approximately 20x 40 in size with a fenced
area with one access point closest to the food vendor on the NE side. A stationed police officer will be
at the access point /Edina 50 surface lot during beer garden hours. The Edina Art Fair will work closely •
with the Edina Police Department for recommendations on number of security needed. A staff of the
partnered beer provider will check ID's and a stamp on the visitor hands will identify visitors 21 years
and older. Seating inside the fenced area will have tables, chairs and umbrellas. Visitors will be allowed
to leave the designated area or enter the area with food from the vendors outside the fenced in area.
Visitors may not leave with purchased beer and must leave on a table while they leave the fenced area.
They will be checked for a stamped hand for re -entry. The beer provider will provide the insurance
needed to insure the designated area. Additional peds will be on the outside of the Edina 50 lot to
ensure safety from traffic on 49'/: Street.
All staff working at the microbrew garden will have alcohol awareness training by the designated beer
provider. The partnered beer provider will have an ID checking guideline for all staff before the selling
of alcohol and approved by the Edina Police Department before the event. A taxi service will be
available for anyone who has consumed alcohol during the event.
0
10ft MARK
101 x 10f1 14ft x 10ft
Fra,m Edina, NiN _
0
t
■
O � °
O
•
i`
0
D
.D
O
Signage
Will
Include:
- Banner
for Beer
Garden
Edina 5 -0 Parking Lot (49 1/2 St. & Halifax Ave.)
I]
0
•
•
•
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Bill Neuendorf
Economic Development Manager
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Grandview Former Public Works Site
Discovery Phase Update
Action Requested:
No action. Discussion only.
Background:
o e
�•'���il11lK�liT��O
IHHH
Agenda Item #: VIII. B.
Action ❑
Discussion
Information ❑
During the Exploration Phase, hundreds of suggestions and comments were collected from interested
stakeholders. Each of these comments is being considered as the design team prepares options for the site.
After four months of exploring possibilities for the City's former Public Works site, the design team
prepared three preliminary concepts to illustrate how a variety of public and private components could
work together on the 3.3 acre site. Each scenario incorporates a mixture of public and private uses.
A public meeting to present and solicit input on these preliminary concepts was held on March 11, 2015.
Approximately 100 residents attended the meeting to provide input on the initial concepts and to raise
concerns and suggestions about the site and the process. It should be noted that the each of the preliminary
concepts shared with the public are truly preliminary. Each concept was presented in the early stage of
design and were shared with the public to collect additional preferences that could be addressed in the final
design.
All materials used at the public meeting, including a compilation of comments received has been posted on
www.edinamn.gov /grandview. Some residents asked specific questions about the preliminary concepts but
the design has not yet progressed to the level of detail where all questions can be answered. It should be
noted that several residents in attendance preferred that the City use the entire site for public purposes and
abandon the design of a mixed -use (public/private) project for the site. Other participants encouraged the
City to continue on the path envisioned in the 2012 Grandview Development Framework.
Attachments:
Discussion points
Four themes for Community Uses from March I I t,
Updated draft site scenarios
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Discussion Phase Update & Discussion Points
April 7, 2015
Page 2 .
Discussion Points
1) Preliminary Scenarios
The participants at the March I I th public meeting offered several suggestions and raised concerns to
improve the preliminary concepts. Some elements of each concept were clearly supported while others
were clearly not, although an overwhelming preference for one of the three concepts did not emerge.
The scenarios continue to be refined based on the public input and preliminary market feasibility study.
Updated scenarios are attached. Based on the input received, the size of the indoor civic space has been
increased. The size of the outdoor public plazas has also been increased. The placement of the individual use
components has been re- arranged based on suggestions. As requested, the final site design will include
improvements intended for pedestrians, bicyclists and drivers. As suggested by many participants,
improvements to adjacent portions of Eden Ave. and Arcadia Ave. will also be incorporated into the final
design.
In the weeks ahead, these concepts will continue to be refined to include more detail, including cost
estimates and fiscal impacts of each.
➢ It would be helpful to know whether the Council supports any one of these revised concepts more
than the others.
➢ It would also be helpful to know whether the Council suggests that any of the concepts be
eliminated and whether any additional scenarios should be added. 0
2) Programming of Civic Space
There are distinct groups of community supporters for four types of community programming for the new
community space. To date, the design team has used the term "civic" to identify these potential public uses.
Descriptions of the most popularly requested community spaces are attached. In no particular order, the
four recurring themes are:
• Arts & Culture Center (to replace existing Edina Art Center),
• Performing Arts, Culture & History Center (to replace and expand Edina Art Center)
• Multigenerational Community Center (to supplement existing community facilities)
• Fitness & Wellness Center (to create a new type of City facility)
The Discovery Phase yielded continued support for each of these types of facilities. Unfortunately, the 3.3
acre site cannot accommodate every type of community use suggested.
➢ Direction from the City Council will be essential to select the type of programming to be pursued
on this site.
➢ It would be helpful to know whether any of the four community themes should be removed from
consideration.
➢ It would also be helpful to know whether any community themes not previously identified should be
considered for this site.
➢ Please advise what type of additional information, if any, is helpful to allow City Council to select the 40
programming functions for the new community space.
Discussion Phase Update & Discussion Points
April 7, 2015
Page 3
3) Use of City Facilities
Based on the four potential community uses identified above, alternates have been prepared to consider how
the use of new and existing City -owned facilities should be arranged. These alternatives are described below.
Alternate One
• Construct new multi - purpose, multi - generational community center at Public Works site
• Move Senior Center functions to new building
• Add new programming for other age groups and interest groups to new building
• Move Art Center to existing Senior Center
• Raze existing Art Center facility
Alternate Two
• Construct new multi - purpose, multi - generational community center at Public Works site
• Move Senior Center functions to new building
• Consider lease existing Senior Center to new user
• Add new programming for other age groups and interest groups to new building
• Move Art Center to new building
• Raze existing Art Center facility
• Alternate Three
• Construct new Arts & Culture Facility at Public Works site
o With or without Performing Arts
• Move existing Art Center to new building
• Raze existing Art Center facility
Alternate Four
Construct new Community Fitness /Wellness Center at Public Works site
o Consider engaging private or non - profit partner to operate facility
Maintain existing Art Center as -is
• Maintain existing Senior Center as -is
➢ It would be helpful to know if the Council has a preference for any of these alternates.
➢ It would also be helpful to identify other alternatives that should be considered.
4) Prioritization of Public Goals: housing, environmental efficiency and multi -modal transit
The City of Edina has defined goals regarding environmental efficiency, affordably- priced housing and multi -
modal transportation (aka park -n -ride facility). These goals are articulated in the Comprehensive Plan and
other guiding documents. Several commissions and advisory teams have worked to refine these goals and
continue to pursue their implementation. Unfortunately, it may not be possible to satisfy each of these goals
• simultaneously while delivering a successful project on this site.
Discussion Phase Update & Discussion Points
April 7, 2015
Page 4
➢ Recognizing that each of these goals is desirable, how does the City Council suggest they be
prioritized if only one or two of these can be readily incorporated into the site?
5 Funding
The design team is frequently asked about the long -term ownership or control of the site. While it is too
early to define exact details of ownership, it is likely that the City will consider selling or leasing a portion of
the site to or from the future developer. This sale or lease will help pay for the costs of a new public facility
and site infrastructure and will simplify the financing of the private elements. The development partner
prefers a sale of a portion of the site since a long -term lease could impact the ability to finance the private
building.
It is also likely that the City will retain control of a significant portion of the site through direct ownership
or by easement and access rights to be spelled out in a future redevelopment agreement.
Due to the blighted nature of the site, the creation of a new TIF Redevelopment District is envisioned to
help fund public improvements and infrastructure in and around the site, as well as other eligible costs
identified in state law.
➢ Does the City Council have opposition or concerns about any of these funding strategies.
•
Additional direction from the City Council is helpful as the design team continues to revise and refine the
preliminary concepts. City staff and members from the Frauenshuh team will be attendance to answer any
questions you may have and to discuss any of these topics.
0 0
Arts & Culture Center
X C l
W
6
a 0 j
0
Performing Arts, Culture & History Center
15,000 to 30,000 square feet on I or 2 levels.
Typical Size &
Spaces for visual arts education, classrooms, pottery, artist studios,
Program Elements
history exhibit, gallery space, poetry readings and small group lectures,
Program Elements
artists lockers, teen hangout, multipurpose /flexible community meeting
space, community oven, cafe, gift shop
Competitive
Low — Four similar facilities located within 14 miles are sponsored by
Landscape
communities with little competition from the private market.
Parking Demand
— predictable usage with increases for special events and
Landscape
special programming
Construction Costs
Low / Ale
Operating Costs
Low - Existing staff and existing enterprise budget can be retained; any
increases in staffing to be determined
Potential
Long -term debt, sale of public land, high potential for philanthropic
Revenue Sources
donations, registration fees, rental fees, retail sales
0
Performing Arts, Culture & History Center
20,000 to 35,000 square feet.
Spaces for visual arts education, classrooms, pottery, artist studios,
Typical Size &
history exhibit, history archives /library, gallery space, poetry readings
Program Elements
and small group lectures, artists lockers, teen hangout, 200 -400 seat
auditorium, black box /multipurpose /flexible community meeting space,
(community oven, cafe, gift shop
Low — Four similar facilities located within 14 miles are sponsored by
Competitive
communities with little competition from the private market. Nearby
Landscape
auditoriums are 600 -800 seats, with little competition for a smaller
fixed -seat hall.
Parking Demand
/ High — predictable usage with higher demands for special
performances
Construction Costs
/ High
Operating Costs
Low / Existing staff and existing enterprise budget can be
retained with some staff increases likely
Potenital
Long -term debt, sale of public land, high potential for philanthropic
Revenue Sources
donations, registration fees, rental fees; retail sales
Multi Generation Community Center
Fitness /Wellness Center
10,000 to 20,000 square feet on I or 2 levels.
Typical Size &
Flexible space that can be used for a variety of community needs as
Program Elements
needed, gallery space, history exhibit, 10 -20 person meeting rooms,
multi - purpose room for 100 -200 people, all -ages programming for
Competitive
fitness, education, teens, & seniors, cafe.
Competitive
Landscape
Low — similar services scattered at multiple sites in Edina
Parking Demand
Moclerat�_ — predictable usage with higher demands for special events
Construction Costs
Low / Moderate
Operating Costs
t�sr:�erate - Some existing staff can be retained with some new staff
Potential
likely
Potential
Long -term debt, sale of public land, philanthropic donations, user fees,
Revenue Sources
rental fees; retail sales
Fitness /Wellness Center
0 0 0
20,000 to 60,000 square feet on I or 2 levels.
Typical Size &
Indoor multi - purpose court, cardio equipment, strength training, weight
Program Elements
room, multiple rooms for fitness classes, indoor walking loop, lap pool,
locker rooms.
Competitive
High — Six existing full - service fitness centers within 5- miles.An
Landscape
additional 10 smaller facilities also within 5- miles.
Parking Demand
High — dramatically high peaks in the early evening and weekends
Construction Costs
/ High
Operating Costs
High - New staff and enterprise budget will be needed
Potential
Long -term debt, sale of public land, some philanthropic support possible,
Revenue Sources
monthly /daily user fees, rental fees
0 0 0
PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION — CONCEPT I
APRIL 7, 2015
0
ail
•
&Cps"o-
PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - CONCEPT 2
APRIL 7, 2015 40
#2
kX 9&1*)L
0
•
PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION - CONCEPT 3
APRIL 7, 2015
•
s
kt, "o-
4
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering
�A
Cn
0
Nov � Any
IHHH
L Item #: VIII. C.
Action
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: Resolution 2015 -33 Municipal State Aid Routes Designation Changes
Action Requested:
Adopt Resolution 2015 -33 to revise the City of Edina's Municipal State Aid System.
Information / Background:
To support the state's system of roadways, Minnesota Department of Transportation allocates construction
and maintenance funds for counties, cities, and townships with populations greater than 5,000 through the
Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) program.
Cities are allowed to designate up to 20% of their total local street mileage as MSA roadways. The City of
Edina has 204.25 miles of local roadways, which translates to a maximum MSA allocation of 40.85 miles.
After completing the 2014 Annual Certification of Mileage, Edina currently designates 40.69 miles as MSA,
with 0.16 miles remaining eligible for designation.
50% of Municipal State Aid funding is apportioned based on city populations. The other 50% is apportioned
based on Construction Needs, or the relative cost to build and maintain city streets to MSA design
standards. These design standards are based on existing traffic volumes, such that higher - volume roadways
are more expensive to construct due to the street width requirements. Designating higher - volume
roadways, therefore, generates a larger value for Construction Needs, which results in a larger portion of the
overall Construction Needs allocation.
For this reason, the Engineering Department recommends making the following revisions to the City of
Edina's Municipal State Aid system;
• Revoking 1.48 miles of MSA roadways with traffic volumes between 1,400 and 1,800 vehicles per
day
• Designating 1.85 miles of local streets with traffic volumes between 2,600 and 5,100 vehicles per
day as MSA roadways
• Designating 0.42 miles of MSA roadway as common boundary MSA roadway with the City of
Bloomington
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th 5t. • Edina, MN 55424
REPORT / RECOMMENDATION
Page 2
. The existing 2.06 miles of MSA roadways recommended for revisions (including revocations, common
boundary revision, and undesignated mileage) generate $2,399,211.46 in Construction Needs, or $1,165,000
per mile. The 2.06 miles of newly- designated MSA routes (including the common boundary revision)
generate $2,873,368.33 in Construction Needs, or $1,395,000 per mile. Together, these revisions will
increase Construction Needs by $474,156.87, resulting in a larger percentage of the overall MSA Needs
allocation.
Staff recommends adopting Resolution 2015 -33.
Attachments:
Resolution 2015 -33 Municipal State Aid System Revisions
City of Edina Engineering Department Municipal State Aid Revisions Letter
Minnesota Department of Transportation Municipal State Aid Needs Unit Memo
City of Edina 2014 Annual Certification of Mileage
•
G: \PW\INFRAS \AGENCIES \STATE \MNDOT\STATE AID \MSAS Needs \Certification \2014 MSA Changes \Council Items \Item VIII. C. Res. No. 2015 -33 Municipal State Aid.docx
40
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -33
REVISING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Edina that revisions hereinafter described shall be
made to the City's Municipal State Aid Streets system under the provisions of Minnesota Laws;
BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina that the roads described as follows, to -wit:
Valley View Road from Tracy Venue to Hillside Road
(MSAS 120 - 152 -10, Length = 0.14 miles)
Valley View Road from Hillside Road to Hanson Road
(MSAS 120 - 151 -70, Length = 0.31 miles)
Hansen Road from Valley View Road to West 601h Street
(MSAS 120 - 151 -80, Length = 0.39 miles)
Hansen Road from West 60th Street to Soo Line Railroad
(MSAS 120 - 151 -90, Length = 0.43 miles)
Hansen Road from Soo Line Railroad to Vernon Avenue
• (MSAS 120 - 151 -100, Length = 0.21 miles)
be, and hereby are, revoked as Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Edina subject to the approval of the
Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
to -wit:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina that the roads described as follows,
Parklawn Avenue from Gallagher Drive to France Avenue
(MSAS 174, Length = 0.12 miles)
Normandale Road from Benton Avenue to Willson Road
(MSAS 178, Length = 0.66 miles)
Willson Road from Normandale Road to Eden Avenue
(MSAS 178, Length = 0.32 miles)
Normandale Road from West 77th Street to Viking Drive
(MSAS 179, Length = 0.19 miles)
Normandale Road from Edina Industrial Boulevard to Edina Corporate Limits
(MSAS 180, Length = 0.17 miles)
• Washington Avenue from Valley View Road to Edina Corporate Limits
(MSAS 181, common boundary designation with the City of Eden Prairie,
Total Length = 0.77 miles, Edina Length = 0.39 miles)
be, and hereby are, designated as Municipal State Aid Streets of the City of Edina subject to the approval of the
Commissioner of Transportation of the State of Minnesota.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to forward two certified
copies of this resolution to the Commissioner of Transportation for the Commissioner's consideration.
Adopted April 7, 2015
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached
• and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 7, 2015, and
as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of
City Clerk
•
•
September 30, 2014
Revised February 9, 2014
Revised March 16, 2015
Julie Dresel, P.E.
Metro State Aid
Waters Edge Building
1500 W. County Road B -2
Roseville, MN 55113 -3174
Dear Ms. Dresel,
In an effort to include roadways that better meet the definition of a State Aid Route based on ADT values, and in
cooperation with the Cities of Eden Prairie and Bloomington, the City of Edina is proposing revisions to our
Municipal State Aid System.
The City wishes to revoke the Municipal State Aid designation from the following segments:
Segment #
Street
Termini
Mileage
120- 152 -10
Valley View Road
Tracy Avenue to Hillside Road
0.14
120 - 151 -70
Valley View Road
Hillside Road to Hansen Road
0.31
120 - 151 -80
Hansen Road
Valley View Road to West 60t Street
0.39
120 - 151 -90
Hansen Road
West 60t Street to Soo Line Railroad
0.43
120 - 151 -100
Hansen Road
Soo Line Railroad to Vernon Avenue
0.21
Total
1.48
After completing the 2014 Certification of Mileage, the City has 0.16 miles that are available to designate. After
revoking the above segments, the total mileage available for designation is 1.64 miles.
Therefore, the City of Edina wishes to propose a system revision. The following table lists the proposed street
designations:
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392
0
•
0
New Segments -
Location #
Street
Termini
Total
Edina
(on map)
Mileage
Mileage
W 78 Street
Valley View Road to Edina Corporate Limits
1
Washington Avenue
Edina Corporate Limits (1/2 Bloomington)
0.77
0.39
120 - 176 -15
1/2 Eden Prairie)
2
Parklawn Avenue
Gallagher Avenue to France Avenue
0.12
0.12
3
Normandale Road
Benton Avenue to South View Lane
0.25
0.25
4
Normandale Road
South View Lane to Willson Road
0.41
0.41
5
Willson Road
Normandale Road to Eden Avenue
0.32
0.32
Edina Industrial Boulevard to Edina
6
Normandale Road
0.17
0.17
Corporate Limits
7
Normandale Road
W 77' Street to Viking Drive
0.19
0.19
Total
1.85
Revised Se ments -
Location #
Street
Termini
Total
Edina
(on map)
Mileage
Mileage
W 78 Street
th
W 78 Street Roundabout (east of TH 169) to
8
(MSAS 120 - 176 -10,
Edina Corporate Limits (1/2 Bloomington)
0.42
0.21
120 - 176 -15
Total
0.21
Location 1: Washington Avenue, Valley View Road to Edina Corporate Limits (1/2 Eden Prairie)
This segment provides primary access to many industrial businesses in Edina and Eden Prairie, as well as
secondary access to industrial businesses on West 74th Street and West 76th Street. The ADT of this segment is
4,800 vehicles per day.
Location 2: Parklawn Avenue, Gallagher Avenue to France Avenue
This segment provides primary access to commercial and residential properties, and connects existing State Aid
routes on Parklawn Avenue and Gallagher Avenue. The ADT of this segment is 2,600 vehicles per day.
Location 3: Normandale Road, Benton Avenue to South View Lane
This segment provides access to northbound Trunk Highway 100, Normandale Elementary School, the Edina
Community Center, and connects existing State Aid routes on Benton Avenue and South View Lane. The ADT
of this segment is 4,900 vehicles per day.
Location 4: Normandale Road, South View Lane to Willson Road
This segment provides primary access to residential neighborhoods, commercial businesses, and connects
existing State Aid routes on South View Lane and Eden Avenue. The ADT of this segment is 4,100 vehicles per
day.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392
0
Location 5: Willson Road, South View Lane to Eden Avenue
This segment provides primary access to residential neighborhoods, commercial businesses, and connects
existing State Aid routes on South View Lane and Eden Avenue. The ADT of this segment is 4,100 vehicles per
day.
Location 6: Normandale Road, Edina Industrial Boulevard to Edina Corporate Limits
This segment provides primary access to commercial and industrial businesses, and connects existing State Aid
routes in the Cities of Edina and Bloomington. The ADT of this segment is 4,850 vehicles per day.
Location 7: Normandale Road, West 77h Street to Viking Drive
This segment provides primary access to commercial and industrial businesses, and connects existing State Aid
routes in the Cities of Edina and Bloomington. The ADT of this segment is 3,500 vehicles per day.
Location 8: West 781h Street, East Frontage Road th169 to Edina Corporate Limits (1/2 Bloomington)
In cooperation with the City of Bloomington, we are proposing to combine these two segments (MSAS 176 -10
and 176 -15) and designate it as a "common boundary" segment. The total length is 0.42 miles, which is currently
all included in Edina's mileage. After this change, The Cities of Edina and Bloomington will each take 0.21
miles of this segment into their systems.
This segment provides access to many commercial and industrial businesses in Edina and Bloomington, and
connects existing State Aid routes in the Cities of Edina and Bloomington. The ADT of this segment is 8,000
Ol vehicles per day.
Attached is a map showing the locations of proposed revocations and designations of MSA streets in the City of
Edina.
We are submitting this for your review and approval prior to approval by the City Council by resolution. Please
feel free to contact me at 952- 826 -0318 or cmillner @EdinaMN.gov with any questions.
Sincerely,
Z4 A IWA-
Chad A. Millner, P.E.
Director of Engineering
cc: Bill Lanoux/MnDOT
julee Puffer /MnDOT
Margaret Hylton /MnDOT
Randy Newton /Eden Prairie
jen Desrude /Bloomington
G:\ PMINFRASWGENCIES \STATE\MNDOIITATE AID \MSAS Needs\C,rt11,,fl —"014 MIA C1angeskDSAE- LTR -020915.docx
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439
www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952- 826 -0392
•
0
City of Edina
Municipal State Aid Streets
14A.. State
`L State Aid Streets
o e l Proposed State Aid Revocations
Jy
Proposed State Aid Designations
N
W +E
S
Engineering Dept
February, 2015
4,pNESq,gy Minnesota Department of Transportation
395 John Ireland Boulevard
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Memo
TO: Mr. Chad Millner (Acting)
Edina City Engineer
7450 Metro Blvd.
Edina, MN 55439
FROM: William Lanoux
Manager, Municipal State Aid Needs Unit
DATE: March 20, 2015
SUBJECT: Municipal State Aid Designations and Revocations
The following Municipal State Aid Street designations will be approved when the City
Council resolution is received:
Extension of MSAS 174 Parklawn Avenue- Gallager Drive to France Avenue (CSAH 17) (0.12
existing miles)
MSAS 178 Normandale Road /Wilson Road- Benton Avenue to Eden Avenue (0.98 existing
miles)
MSAS 179 Normandale Road (East of TH 100)- Viking Drive to West 77th Street (0.19 existing
miles)
MSAS 180 Normandale Road (West of TH 100)- Corporate Limits to Edina Industrial
Boulevard (0.17 existing miles)
MSAS 181 Washington Ave- Corporate Limits to Valley View Road (common boundary
designation with Eden Prairie. Total length of 0.78 miles. Each city designates 0.39 miles on its
MSAS system.)
The following Municipal State Aid Street revocations will be approved when the City
Council resolution is received:
Part of MSAS 152 Valley View Road- Tracy Avenue to Hillside Road (0.14 existing miles)
Part of MSAS 151 Valley View Road- Hillside Road to Hansen Road (0.31 existing miles)
Part of MSAS 151 Hansen Road- Valley View Road to Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) (1.03
existing miles)
The following two Municipal State Aid Street segments need to be combined into one
segment and then designated as "common boundary ". They do not need to be included
on the City Council resolution because they are staying on the MSAS system:
These are the two segments as they are before revision:
MSAS 176 West 78th Street- City Limits to 0.20 Mi W. (0.20 existing miles)
MSAS 176 West 78th Street- 0.20 MI W of City Limits to E Frontage Rd TH 169 (0.22 existing
miles)
There will be one segment after the system revision:
MSAS 176 West 78th Street- Corporate Limits to East Frontage Road TH 169 (Common
Boundary designation with Bloomington. Total length is 0.42 miles. Each city designates 0.21
miles on its MSAS system.)
An Equal Opportunity Employer
E) 0 0, 0 C) 0 (5 0
�J
0
(Bottom line: Edina had 0.42 of needs miles on W. 78th Street. After revision it will be 0.21)
The following documents must be submitted before further processing can occur:
A Commissioner's Order will follow after the City Council resolution is received and
approved by the Commissioner.
Needs Update Comments:
No paybacks on revocations
If the City Council resolution is received by the DSAE by May 1, 2015, routes designated can receive
Needs and will be used in the calculation of your 2016 allotment. Include the road data with your
normal spring 2015 computer Needs update.
Certification of Mileage Update Comments:
If the City Council resolution is received by the DSAE by May 1, 2015 include the revisions on the 2015
Annual Certification of Mileage that is due in January 2016.
If you have any questions, contact your DSAE or Bill Lanoux at (651) 366 -3817 for instructions.
cc. District State Aid Engineer
File
An Equal Opportunity Employer
0
D O • O 0
Available Mileage
0.16
2014 Certified Mileage
•
Revoked Mileage
1.48
•
Change on W. 78 th Street
0.21
Now a common boundary
-
Desi nated Mileage
1.85
Remaining Available Mileage
0.00
cc. District State Aid Engineer
File
An Equal Opportunity Employer
0
D O • O 0
•
2014
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
OF MILEAGE
SEE INSTRUCTIONS INCLUDED ON WEB SITE
RECORD REVISIONS ON BACK OF FORM
SUBMIT TO YOUR DSAE BY JANUARY 15, 2015
Municipal Mileage Revisions During
as of Dec. 31, 2013 11 Current Year (+ or
Municipal Mileage
as of Dec. 31, 2014
> >
zw z
t° w F Zw H
I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XI
MILEAGE
NOT CONSIDERED IN THE COMPUTATION
OF BASIC MILEAGE
1. Trunk Highways
13.63
13.63
13.63
13.63
2. Trunk Highways Turnbacks
(Designated as MSAS - mileage above 20 %)
3. County State Aid Highways
(Exclude mileage designated as MSAS)
9.06
9.06
9.06
9.06
4. County State Aid Highway Turnbacks
(Designated as MSAS - mileage above 20 %)
(+ or -)
5. Total Mileage of Line 1 Thru 4 Previous = 22.69 Adjustment = Current =
22.69
BASIC MILEAGE: MILEAGE CONSIDERED IN THE COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE
MILEAGE
6. Municipal State Aid Streets
(Exclude Trunk and County Highway Turnbacks
and Mileage Partly Outside the City Limits in a non MSAS
city)
40.27
40.27
0.42
0.42
40.69
40.69
7. County Road Turnbacks
(Designated as MSAS)
8. County Roads
(Exclude mileage designated as MSAS)
9. Other Local Roads And Streets - not designated
(Include T.H. & CSAH frontage roads)
163.98
163.98
(0.42 )
(0.42)
163.56
163.56
(+ or )
10. Total Improved Basic Mileage (lines 6 + 7 + 8 + 9) Previous = 204.25 Adjustment = Current =
2204.25
11. Percentage Limitation Allowed by Statute X
0.20
12. MAXIMUM MILEAGE ALLOWED FOR M.S.A.S. DESIGNATIONS (Col XI, Line 10 Times Line 11).
40.85
11 Total Municipal State Aid Street Designated (Colum XII, Line 2 + 4 + 6 + 7). 40.69
14. Total Miles of T.H. & County Highway Turnbacks designated as MSAS Above 20% (Col. XII Line 2 + 4 + 7). (-)
15. Mileage designated MSAS - not including T.H. and C.R. Turnback mileage (Line 13 minus Line 14). ( -)
40.69
16. MSAS Mileage Partly Outside the City Limits in a non MSAS city (-)
17. Municipal State Aid Street Mileage Over /Under Maximum Allowed. (Line 12 minus line 15 minus Line 16).
0.16
I hereby certify that total Im prove ile age (Co1.Xl. Line S + 10) in the Municipality of Edina as of December 31, 2014 is 226.94 Miles. f
+
Date t7�� / r
Signed / / Title re a✓ t✓t /IPFY;n �/ ✓L�
N.IMSASICEATIFIOATKR Di MILUOENZRT FOAMS ;BUNIQVMiII FORYUlAS1201. OERTIFIOpTIOA OF MILEAO[ FCRM.XLS
0
0
JAN. 1 TO DEC. 31, 2014
MUNICIPALITY EDINA
REVISIONS MADE DURING 2014
. rnnctni 0- Svcte Revlsinn A kdictional Fvchanaa. Adminislralive Revision. etc
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS Regular Mileage
MILEAGE CHANGE + OR -
Route Original Revised or Date of Change Reason Indicate If Needs
Number Mlles Non- Un- Improved Total New Miles were updated In
Existing Improved 2014
Overall system reviewed, improved
136
2.33
0.02
0.02
235
1213012014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
138
1.42
0.06
0.06
148
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
141
1.09
0.05
-0.05
1,04
1213012014
accurac of measurn lechni ues
No _
Overall system reviewed, improved
143
1.65
0.01
-0.01
1.64
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
_ _
Overall system reviewed, improved
145
2.71
0.05
0.05
2.76
12130/2014
accurac of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
147
1 2.12
0,02
-0.02
2.10
12/30/2014
accuracy of measurin lechniciues
Overall system reviewed, improved
No
148
2.16
0.08
0.08
2.24
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
150
2.70
0.02
0.02
2.72
12/30/2014
accuracy of measurin lechni ues
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
151
3.68
0.02
-0.02
3.66
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
152
1.49
0.22
-0.22
1.27
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
154
0.58
0.01
-0.01
0.57
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techni ues
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
156
0.90
0.02
0.02
0.92
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, Improved
157
0.39
0.02
-0.02
0.37
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
accuracy of measuring techniques, shared
160
0.42
0.16
0.16
0.58
12/3112014
mileage with City of Bloomington included
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
161
1 25
002
0.02
1.27
12130/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
164
0 70
0.04
0.04
034
12/30/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, Improved
accuracy of measuring techniques, shared
171
0.28
0.20
0.20
0.48
12131/2014
mileage with City of Bloomington included
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
173
0.24
0.02
-0.02
0.22
12130/2014
accuiacyofmeasuiing techniques
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
accuracy of measuring techniques, shared
176
0.10
0.10
1.26
12130/2014
mileage with City of Bloomington included
No
Overall system reviewed, improved
177
1.99
0.02
0.02
2.01
12130/2014
accuracy of measuring techniques
No
I
29.26
0.42
0.42
29.68
TOTAL MILEAGE CHANGE + or - (Insert on Line 6)
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS County Road, CSAH or TH Turnback
TOTAL MILEAGE CHANGE + or - (Insert on Line 2 or Line 4 or Line 7
COUNTY ROADS or COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAYS
TOTAL MILEAGE CHANGE + or - (Insert on Line 3 or Line 8)
TRUNK HIGHWAYS
TOTAL MILEAGE CHANGE+ or - Insert on Line 1
IltV ir5LERrY1CAnGrI a uEFAG'_lCenbm ryvalwJ IxrJn \Via Ca1r�NUr d rr �errrpm.t.
To: MAYOR & COUNCIL
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: April 7, 2015
1r�
oew,�
o
� ��COAPOliA��� •
IBftB
Agenda Item #: VIII. D.
Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -35 Accepting Various Grants & Donations
Action Requested:
Adopt Resolution.
Information / Background:
Action
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by
four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing
the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration.
Attachments:
Resolution No. 2015 -35
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -35
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal
property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds
majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation
the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens.
Edina Art Center:
Andy & Michelle Herring $500.00
John & Shirley Nelson $25.00
Elizabeth Goff Eight Plastic Potter Bats
Lola Ronning Seven Art Books
Dated: April 7, 2015
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
James B. Hovland, Mayor
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 7, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this
day of
City Clerk
C7
r 1
•
To: City Council
From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Student Board and Commission Member On- Boarding
o Ce: �
IHHfl
Agenda Item #: Vlll. E.
Action ❑
Discussion FX
Information ❑
Action Requested:
City Council provide direction on student board and commission member on- boarding and select
interview dates.
Information / Background:
In previous years, the student board and commission member on- boarding timeline has started in the spring.
The following steps of events occurred last year in order to on -board 16 new students to eight of Edina's
advisory boards and commissions.
April — Press release, recruitment
May — Application open
June — Interviews conducted
June /July — Appointments approved
August — Orientation
September — Term start
Again, in previous years, 2 council members have volunteered to interview and recommend appointments of
new student board and commission members for City Council approval. The two City Council members
interviewed every eligible applicant. In 2014, there were 58 student applicants.
Staff requests guidance for the following:
I. Interview Participation
Do members of City Council want to conduct interviews or ask staff to coordinate interview
committee?
2. Interview Dates (3.5 hours on 3 separate days)
Last day of school is May 29, 2015. Possible interview dates: June 1, June 3, June 4, June 8, June 9,
June 10, June I I
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
To: MAYOR & COUNCIL
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Correspondence
Action Requested:
No action is necessary.
tit
(J)
y
• ,�L�oRFOPl'��O •
lass
Agenda Item #: IX. A.
Action XX
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
Attachment:
Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424
Section Officers
Mr. Scott Neal
Steve Fessler, PGA
City of Edina, City Manager
President
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Joel Burger, PGA
Vice President
Dear Mr. Neal,
Mark Foley, PGA
Secretary
We cannot express how thankful we are the courtesy the Braemar Golf Dome
and its staff provided us the past 3 weeks with the MN Section
Peter Kurvers, PGA
PGA/Minneapolis VA Hospital Adoptive Golf program. Our program helps our
Honorary President
military veterans that have been prescribed to the polytrama unit here in
Minneapolis for therapeutic recovery. We use golf as a means to help these
individuals, through this therapeutic program, which allows them to get back to
Staff Directors
a sense of normalcy and back into society, like they once were, prior to their
brain trauma. The program is conducted both in the winter as well as during the
Jon Toilette
summer months.
Executive Director
•Darren DeYoung Unfortunately, we were forced to find a new winter location, this past month.
Tournament Director We contacted Mr. Joe Abood at Braemar and thru his generosity we were able
to conduct another extremely successful program. The donation of range time
Kathy Swanson, PGA /LPGA and golf balls was appreciated by Veterans, PGA Professionals and VA
Director of Member Services Volunteers.
& Player Development
Bob Bush Additionally, we can't thank Mr. Joe Greupner and his entire staff, including
Junior Golf Director Mr. Alex Holderson. They were a huge help with our weekly needs in reserving
stall space, supplying range balls, assisting with getting our veteran's in and out
of the Braemar Golf Dome facility, etc...
Mr. Neal, you should be proud of what you have in Edina both from a facility
standpoint but more importantly, the professional courteous individuals you
have operating your golf properties.
Warmest Regards,
Steve Fessler, PGA
Minnesota Section PGA, President
Head Golf Professional
Riverwood National Golf Club
R/ "
Paul Kelley, PG
Program Director
Head Golf Professional
Woodhill Country Club
Bunker Hills Golf Club
12800 Bunker Prairie Road I Coon Rapids, Minnesota 55448
T: 763 -754 -0820 1 F: 763 -754 -6682 1 (800) 742 -1916 1 www.MinnesotaPGA.com
Heather Branigin 1 •
From: Nora Slawik < nora.slawik @ci.maplewood.mn.us>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:43 AM
To: James Hovland; elaine .koutsoukos @metc.state.mn.us
Cc: Melinda Coleman; Paul Schnell
Subject: TAB Executive Committee Letter for Today
Attachments: NoraSlawikMaplewoodTABLetterMl .doc
March 18, 2015
Mayor Jim Hovland
TAB Chair
TAB Coordinator
390 North Robert Street
St Paul, Mn 55101
Dear Mayor Hovland,
I am writing because I have a conflict with today's TAB meeting and I understand you will be discussing the Executive
Committee selection with the members. At the TAB meeting time I will be testifying at the legislature on a bill to name a
portion of Highway 36 after Sergeant Joseph Bergeron, Five years ago the City of Maplewood suffered a great loss in the
senseless and brutal murder Sergeant Bergeron and this bill will place a sign as a visual reminder so that our community
will never forget his sacrifice. _0
I applied as a City member of the TAB Executive Committee. As the Mayor of Maplewood I serve on several
transportation related initiatives including as a member of the TAB, the Policy Advisory Chair of the Rush Line Task Force
and as a member of the Gateway /Gold Line Corridor Commission.
I would bring a broad understanding of regional issues to the TAB Executive Committee. During the last year as a
member of TAB I have gained a keen awareness of the mission of the TAB to perform transportation planning and
programming for the Metro Area. With my background serving seven terms in the Minnesota House I bring an
understanding that the TAB is responsible for the continuing, cooperative and comprehensive transportation planning
process in the Metro Area based on Minnesota statutes and federal regulations on urban transportation planning.
As Maplewood Mayor I bring leadership skills to help me pay attention to the various points of view that are heard and
discussed when establishing transportation policy and allocating transportation funds. During the past year we have
experienced growing tension between the TAB members on how to effectively balance the transportation funding
equity between counties with more poverty and counties with more growth. As a member of the Executive Committee
1 would ensure that there is a good process and forum for deliberation at the TAB meetings among our members and
also with state, regional and local officials and citizens on issues that affect transportation funding and planning.
In the past year the TAB has accomplished a great deal of work including the passage of the 2040 Transportation Policy
Plan which is one of the three major system plans from Thrive MSP 2040. 1 would help with the implementation of the
plan, which reflects a combination of policy discussion and technical analysis.
have worked hard to keep my attendance at the TAB regular and to review the agenda items including the action items
and the information and discussion items such as the Rail Safety Update, the Legislative Report and the Modern
Streetcar Policy Update presented at the last meeting. As an elected leader for the past 16 years I have worked to
strengthen the relationships with the many members of the TAB and to understand the differing points of view.
• Again, I apologize for not being there in person today and the consideration of the TAB members is much appreciated.
Sincerely,
Nora Slawik
Nora Slawik
Mayor
City of Maplewood
1830 County Road B East
Maplewood, MN 55109
651.738.7099
nora.slawik @ci.maplewood.mn.us
•
•
Heather Branigin is
From: LAURA HOPE MELTON <hopemelton @hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:25 AM
To: Edina Mail
Cc: Ibuinno @EdinaMN.gov
Subject: Letter to Mayor
Attachments: Ltr to Council 31215.pdf
Dear Lynette
Please distribute this letter to the Mayor and Council. If you could confirm this request, I'd be most
grateful.
Best Wishes,
Hope Melton
0
•
March 18, 2015
Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council;
On March 11th, I attended the Grandview Discovery Session. It was a disheartening
experience.
Throughout this multi -year planning process, a majority of residents favored the creation
of a premier public facility with arts, fitness, incubator /co- working, and office space.
They stated emphatically; No more massive office, retail, and multi -story luxury
residential buildings on this site. They wanted this public land to remain publicly owned.
What did we get in all three scenarios at the March 11th Discovery Session?
No multi - purpose community center
A predominance of office, retail, and luxury residential buildings with some
"civic" and "public" space wedged in here and there.
Complete privatization of the land.
•
There was very little time devoted to public discussion. Instead, we were to individually
tour the scenario "stations" like consumers exercising our individual preferences for
some pre - packaged commercial product.
Such is the result of the City's decision to hire a commercial real estate developer to
determine the future of the Grandview former public works site. It was opposed by a six
to two majority of the Citizen's Advisory Team and the League of Women Voters of
Edina.
This undemocratic planning process is an insult to the intelligence of this community.
By conducting "citizen engagement" when the outcome is predetermined, you are
playing a dangerous game that feeds public cynicism and distrust in government. It's a
game where we all lose.
Respectfully,
L. Hope Melton
41
Heather Branigin •
From: Kathryn Downey <KDowney @hkmlawgroup.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 1:51 PM
To: Traffic Safety
Cc: Kathryn Downey; 'swensonannl @gmail.com'; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; James
Hovland; Mary Brindle
Subject: Traffic Safety Request
Dear Traffic Safety Committee,
I am the parent of a child that attends Creek Valley Elementary School. I live in the Valley Estates neighborhood at 6525
Scandia Road, Due to our close proximity to Creek Valley, our daughter has been designated a "walker" and walks or
bikes to and from school every day.
It is my understanding that the City of Edina Traffic Safety Committee recently issued an edict that parents picking
up /dropping off students at Creek Valley in the small turnaround off Gleason Road should use Creek Valley Road to
access the pick -up area. I am writing to tell you that this is not a workable solution. The Committee's edict has created a
significant traffic and safety issue for the students of Creek Valley. There is now chaos on Creek Valley Road at pick-
up /drop -off time. It is only a matter of time before someone is hurt or an accident occurs. Yesterday, I saw parents
driving up onto the Creek Valley playground and the yards and driveways of neighboring homes in order to turn their
vehicles around on Creek Valley Road to get their place in line for pick -up. It has also created increased congestion on a
road that directly borders the school and its playground which is typically full of kids at the end of the day either playing
during recess or afterwards as a part of the after school program. In addition, there are several children that walk and
bike on Creek Valley Road to their homes in the Valley Estates neighborhood that are endangered by the Committee's .
edict.
I have been impressed by the efforts of Dr. Karl Dahlquist and her staff to monitor the situation but it is apparent that
more needs to be done to protect the children of Creek Valley. Please advise as to: (1) what the Traffic Safety Committee
is doing to monitor the situation that the City of Edina has created by re- routing traffic down Creek Valley Road, and (2)
what the long -term solution is for this safety situation.
Thank you,
Katie Downey
N K
Katie Downey, Attorney at Law
HKM
30 E 7th St., Suite 3200
St. Paul, MN 55101 4919
P 651 227 9411 E 651 223 5199
email 1website1map1v_Card
This e -mail and any attachments to it may be privileged. confidential or contain trade secret infwrnation. if this e -mail was sent to you in error, please notify me •
immediately by either reply e -mail or by phone at 651- 227 -9411, and please do not use, disseminate, retain, print or copy the e -mail or its attachment You will be
reimbursed for any reasonable expenses associated with destroying this e-mail and its attachments.
. Heather Branigin
From: Kristine Norton <kajnorton @gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 3:42 PM
To: James Hovland
Subject: Please keep 70th Street and Cornelia, etc. calm!
I understand from some neighbors that you support more condos being built on France and 72nd, etc. This is NOT ok
with my
family! We need less traffic in our neighborhood and some calm, sigh!
I live on 70th and Cornelia Drive, on the corner. Is there anything you can do to NOT support this, well..., mess ??
THa nks,
Kristine Norton
7007 Cornelia Drive
Edina, MN 55435
952 - 200 -1451
•
•
1
Heather Branigin •
From:
Wally Norlander <wnorlander @gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:29 PM
To:
Edina Mail
Subject:
Sidewalks
My brother asked me yesterday why I was opposed to sidewalks. I formulated my response, and it occurs to me
that I should pass along my answer to you. Please copy the mayor and the city council. Thank you...
Actually, I hadn't given sidewalks much thought until a couple neighbors approached me with a petition
to ask the city council to exempt our little two -block street from the comprehensive sidewalk plan. Turns
out that only one household out of the sixteen on Maddox Lane declined to sign the petition, but the city
council ignored it anyway and there will eventually be at least one sidewalk.
Our reasons: the front lawns are rather shallow and a sidewalk plus boulevard strip would take up about
a third of the front lawns; for some of the homes (on both sides of the street), the grade is quite steep and
a level cut would require substantial retaining walls; there are several mature trees in the proposed
sidewalk paths on both sides of the street; no one has ever requested sidewalks in our neighborhood and
no one ever asked us if we would like to have sidewalks. To our knowledge, there has never been a
vehicle/pedestrian accident on our street. Looks to us like a costly solution in search of a non - existent
problem.
I'A
C
0 Heather Branigin
From: Lindsey Torkilsen <Iorkilsen @mnedc.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 2:10 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Join Us for the Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service!
Dear Mayor James Hovland
We are excited to share an opportunity coming this spring to recognize the important contributions of national
service in your city.
The third annual Mayors Day of Recognition for National Service will take place on Tuesday, April 7, 2015. The goal
is to highlight the impact of AmeriCorps, Senior Corps, and other national service programs in tackling local
problems and managing volunteers for greater impact, and to thank national service members for their
commitment. Participating in the day will highlight the importance of citizen service, bolster support for nonprofit
and national service groups, and help bring more city residents into service.
Though there may be multiple National Service programs serving your community, we would like to make you
aware of the 4 AmeriCorps members serving with the Minnesota Reading Corps and /or Minnesota Math Corps
programs at schools in Edina. These Reading Corps and Math Corps members have committed to a year of service
and are making a difference in the lives of the students they are serving, improving their literacy and math
•skills. To learn more about these programs, please visit our websites at www.minnesotareadingcorps.org and
www.minnesotamathcorps.org.
Last year, 1,760 mayors representing more than 110 million citizens across the country participated in Mayors Day
of Recognition for National Service. This year, 1,444 mayors have already signed up, including Saint Paul Mayor
Chris Coleman, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges, Saint Cloud Mayor Dave Kleis, Rochester Mayor Ardell F. Brede,
and Duluth Mayor Don Ness. You can see the full list here.
I am reaching out to you because as of today, you haven't already signed up. I would to encourage you to consider
doing so. Participation is easy and flexible. Your office could:
* Issue a proclamation
* Visit a national service program
* Invite national service programs to City Hall for a roundtable on service
* Put out a press release, report, or op -ed on the impact of national service in your city
* join with an AmeriCorps or Senior Corps program on a service project
* Use Twitter, Facebook, and other social media outlets to thank those who serve
* Take a group photo with national service members in your city
You can find many resources such as a Mayors Day fact sheet and a sample proclamation on the Mayors Day
Toolkit. You can sign up to participate on the CNCS website.
Thank you for your leadership, and please let us know if you would like more information about the Minnesota
Reading Corps and /or Minnesota Math Corps members serving in your community.
• Yours in service,
Lindsey Torkilsen
Senior Program Manager
Minnesota Reading and Math Corns
Facebook: facebook.comjMNReadingCorps and facebook.com /MNMathcorps
Reading Corps and Math Corps Blog
2400 Park Avenue South,
Minneapolis, MN 55404
Phone: 612 - 206 -3042
Fax: 612 - 871 -1777
Ir rj
corD5.;°
•
0
0
•
March 18, 2015
LEAGUE
WOMEN
E D I N A
OF
VOTERS
Dear Members of the Edina City Council:
For over 30 years, LWV Edina has supported creating and maintaining a community center in Edina that
responds to the diverse and changing needs of all age groups.
The former public works site at 5146 Eden Avenue is available for redevelopment. The process to consider
potential uses for this land is housed in Economic Development. A process to determine the best uses for public
land should not be driven primarily by economic concerns. LWV Edina believes that the public's interests
and needs, balanced with fiscal responsibility once those interests and needs are known, should drive the
redevelopment of public land.
To this end, LWV Edina respectfully asks the City Council to press "pause" on the current Economic
Development process and:
devote the time needed to thoroughly explore the possibility of a new community center on the former
public works site;
consider fully the community feedback that the City has solicited and received; and
demonstrate the economic justification of privatizing the site versus the area -wide economic
development potential of a solely public option.
Investigating the possibility of a new community center on the site would not only be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and Development Framework, but also two City- commissioned community-wide surveys
and countless public comments submitted in person and online.
We would welcome the opportunity to meet with you to discuss this further. Please contact us at your earliest
convenience to set up a time.
Thank you for your consideration, and for your service to Edina.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Janovy
President, LWV Edina
LWVEdina @gmail.com • wwwLVVVEdina.org
0
O�IX"R'T \F•4
° Federal Emergency Management Agency
x �
Washington, D.C. 20472
�1gND S��'J
March 18,205
CERTIFIED MAIL IN REPLY REFER TO:
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Case No.: 14- 05 -2615P
The Honorable James Hovland Community Name: City of Edina, MN
Mayor, City of Edina Community No.: 270160
4801 West 50th Street FIRM Panel Affected: 27053CO362E
Edina, MN 55424
116
Dear Mayor Hovland:
In a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) dated August 8, 2014, you were notified of proposed flood hazard
determinations affecting the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
MN. These determinations were for Weber Park Pond — From approximately 200 feet south of West 39th
Street to approximately 400 feet south of West 42nd Street. The 90 -day appeal period that was initiated
on August 28, 2014, when the Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) published a notice of proposed Flood Hazard Determinations in The Edina Sun Current
has elapsed.
. FEMA received no valid requests for changes to the modified flood hazard information. Therefore, the
modified flood hazard information for your community that became effective on December 29, 2014,
remains valid and revises the FIRM that was in effect prior to that date.
The modifications are pursuant to Section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Public
Law 93 -234) and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended
(Title XIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, Public Law 90 -448), 42 U.S.C.
4001 -4128, and 44 CFR Part 65. The community number(s) and suffix code(s) are unaffected by this
revision. The community number and appropriate suffix code as shown above will be used by the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for all flood insurance policies and renewals issued for your
community.
FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management as required under the above - mentioned Acts of
1968 and 1973. To continue participation in the NFIP, your community must use the modified flood
hazard information to carry out the floodplain management regulations for the NFIP. The modified flood
hazard information will also be used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for all
new buildings and their contents and for the second layer of insurance on existing buildings and their
contents.
If you have any questions regarding the necessary floodplain management measures for your community
or the NFIP in general, please contact the Mitigation Division Director, FEMA Region V, in Chicago,
Illinois, either by telephone at (312) 408 -5500, or in writing at 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor,
Chicago, Illinois 60605.
•
2
If you have any questions regarding the LOMR, the proposed flood hazard determinations, or mapping •
issues in general, please call the FEMA Map Information eXchange, toll free, at (877) 336 -2627 (877 -
FEMA MAP).
Sincerely,
Luis Rodriguez, P.E., Chief
Engineering Management Branch
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration
cc: The Honorable Jeff Jacobs
Mr. Scott Neal
Ms. Debra Heiser
Ms. Ceil Strauss, CFM
Ms. Sarah Stratton
Ms. Janna Kieffer, P.E. •
•
• Heather Branigin
From: Jocelyn Rieder <jocelynrieder @gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 8:42 PM
To: James Hovland
Subject: Grandview
Hello Mayor Hovland,
My name is Jocelyn Rieder. I am a physician at Park Nicollet and I moved here to with my family just under 5 years ago. We love Edina, it
is become such a wonderful place to raise our kids.
I think that the Grandview redevelopment is an excellent opportunity to make Edina and even better place to live. I feel that there is a
lot/enough commercial areas around us. What would be so nice is more community space. A place to be active together with our neighbors
(especially in the winter time.) We have good relationships with our neighbors, but I think that it would be enhanced significantly by
creating more community space in the Grandview area A park, a pool, a gym, another ice rink, meeting rooms, indoor tennis courts. All of
these things bring neighbor's and communities together. (Commercial areas do not.) These are the things that make a family feel like they
belong in a community and truly improves quality of life for the residents.
Respectfully,
Jocelyn Rieder, MD
5109 Oxford Ave.
•
•
Heather Branigin •
From:
Cami Flanagan <cami_flanagan @comcast.net>
Sent:
Friday, March 20, 2015 2:56 PM
To:
Edina Mail
Subject:
Please do not move forward
Hello,
I would like to respectfully ask that the city council not vote for any of the 3 options proposed for the Grandview location. I
have been a resident of Edina for 11 years. I grew up in Hopkins, in Interlachen Park. I have been in and around this
community my entire life.
I cannot imagine how putting in a dense housing structure and more business would benefit my community as a whole. It
might generate some tax dollars, but that makes very little impact on community members daily life as a whole. I believe
most of this housing would also be occupied by people from outside Edina, thus also not benefitting our residents, but
drawing more into it. I'd rather have those that paid for it benefit from it.
I'd like to see a true community center placed there. The Edinborough complex is shared by a hotel and a senior living
high -rise, so this is not a true community space, and it is located in the far end of Edina. I believe a more central location
would benefit more Edinans. I would like to see a center that has something for more people to use. A pool,
bas ketba I Vsport courts, community collaborative meeting space, open spaces for flea market/farmers market type fair, a
theater for community produced arts, banquet space, and a work out facility would all be things I'd like to see
incorporated. These are things all members of our community can utilize, not just hockey and golf fans.
I have been to many community centers with my children for travel basketball games, for birthday parties and for craft
sales. I see that many other communities have embraced such a concept and have also incorporated some small •
business like Subway or other small eateries. Why not let our public land be utilized for the use of the public, not for
private commerce? I think we have obviously reached the dead end of available land, and the opportunity to do this will
not likely come this way soon.
I have watched my beautiful eclectic neighborhood of Morningside turn into Maple Grove and I hate it. I don't want to live
in a manufactured city. Why should we have to, when what we had was real? Please stop changing it for the worse. And
please stop steam rolling the process. When I read about how community members who disagreed with the Grandview
options were told a NO vote would be disregarded it made me both sad and angry. How dare the city not take note that
it's residents had spoken by a majority at that meeting? I feel like this community has a lot of Apathy and the council is
taking advantage of that. Small numbers of voices are still voices and they should be heard, not disregarded.
Do the right thing and start over, make this a public vote!!! Or at least make the effort to reach the public where they
are. Pass out flyers at the schools, golf dome and Braemar, Braemar ice arena, Jerry's, 50th and France and then see
what kind of response you get.
Respectfully, Cami Flanagan
0
• Heather Branigin
From: Suzanne Kerwin <skerwin @comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 12:28 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: league of Women Voters Edina April Programs
Please forward the following information to the Mayor, City Council, Boards and Commissions.
Thanks, Suzanne
What Copper Mining Means for the Boundary Waters and Minnesota
Thursday April 9,
Edina Senior Center, 9:45- 11:30am
Betsy Daub, Policy Director with
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness,
will discuss how proposed copper mines near
the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness could affect the region's
clean water, economy, and recreation. How to be part of the
decision process for these mine projects will also be discussed.
Legalizing Honeybees and Chickens in Edina
Saturday April 11,
Edina City Hall, 9:45- 11:30am
Dianne Plunkett Latham, chair of the
Local Food Task Force of the Edina Energy and Environment Commission,
will discuss the effort to amend city ordinances
to permit residents to keep honeybees and chickens,
consistent with Green Step City guidelines.
School District Referendum Forum
April 20th
City Council Chambers, 7:00pm
The Edina Public Schools, ISD 273, is seeking voter approval for a
$124.9 million facilities plan. The facilities bond referendum will be held on Tuesday, May 5.
Superintendent of Schools Ric Dressen, and Susan Brott, Director of Communications and Community Engagement, will
speak about the referendum and answer questions at this public forum.
If voters approve the referendum, the estimated tax increase on an average Edina residence, with $400,000 taxable
market value, would be $299 /year for 20 years.
Get your questions answered and cast a well informed vote on May 5!
The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that
encourages the informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through
• education and advocacy. For more Information, please visit www.lwvedina.org.
Heather Branigin •
From: LOIS RING <Ilydesigns @msn.com>
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:30 AM
To: Lynette Biunno
Subject: Southdale Library/Reg Center
For City Council
I am disappointed to read the article in the Sun re the Southdale library and Regional Center.
Nothing is stated how much this will cost the taxpayer or what the cost would be to rehab the
existing library. Many of us who use the library like it. The architecture is unique. I hope the council
speaks up in support of the taxpayers.
Lois Ring
7440 Edinborough Way
Edina MN 55435
•
C
Heather Branigin
From: Robert McKlveen <bobmcklveen @mac.com>
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 6:07 PM
To: Bill Neuendorf
Cc: Kimberly Montgomery; swensonannl @gmail.com; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton;
James Hovland; Mary Brindle
Subject: Grandview
Thanks, Bill, for getting back to me about the Grandview discovery session.
I was able to come to the March 11 meeting for a while, and to browse the exhibits and visit with staff.
After seeing the three options presented, I felt that none of the three met my view of how best to use the
Grandview space. All of the presented options looked like huge developments overbuilt for the site, with the
vast majority of the space taken up by residential, office, and commercial space. Here's how I see the project:
• This is a centrally- located, publicly -owned property that should be used for the public good.
• The majority of citizens who have spoken about it favor keeping it in the public domain
• Edina has numerous unmet needs in its truly public facilities, including
o We have no community center (other than limited space in a very run -down school building)
o We have an undersized senior center with grossly insufficient parking
o We have few significant public facilities north of Hwy 62
o We have an art center in need of replacement
o We have no community fitness center
o Central Edina has no transit hub or Park and Ride
With all of these considerations in mind, I strongly favor using the Grandview site to fulfill all of these
needs. None of the three scenarios presented on March 11 provides adequate public facilities to meet these
needs.
At the March 11 meeting, I asked the City staff person who was handing out the "voting" stickers what to do if I
didn't like any of the scenarios presented. He indicated that I should put my stickers on a cardboard folder
being carried by Kim Montgomery if I wanted to "vote" for "none of the options presented." Thus, at staff s
suggestion, I put my stickers on Kim's folder, and I would expect that my vote, thus cast, is counted in the tally
of votes from that meeting.
The City's surveys of public opinion support the use of this land for a new community center. If the City cannot
afford the community center project, then put the repurposing of the Grandview site on hold until a future date,
preserving the land for public use in the future.
In its Request for Interest in this project, the City asked the developer to show us how they would meet our
needs for a significant public facility as a part of Grandview. Frauenshuh has failed to meet this request, as
none of the three scenarios adequately meet the public's needs. All three scenarios should be rejected, and the
project should be returned to the public domain. Failure to do so will mean that a major opportunity for
meeting the public's needs would be lost forever.
Best regards,
Bob McKlveen
On Mar 22, 2015, at 2:24 PM, Bill Neuendorf wrote: •
Hello Mr. McKlveen,
Thanks for your interest in the redevelopment planning of the City's former Public Works site in Grandview.
We've taken the hundreds of various comments and suggestions received over the past several months and are
beginning to distill them down into workable options. All materials shown at the 3/11 public meeting have
been posted online: http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section= discovery phase
We are open to hearing your suggestions and concerns. Please feel free to follow up via email to me directly or
by visiting http://speakupedina.org/ discussions /redevelopment -of -the- former - public- works - site- discoveg-
phase /topics /popular- civic -uses
Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager
952- 826 -0407 1 Fax 952- 826 -0390 Cell 952 -491 -1143
BNeuendorf@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov
...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Robert McKlveen [mailto:bobmcklveenQmac.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 08, 2015 9:05 PM
To: Heather Branigin
Subject: March 11 meeting question
Good evening,
I would like to participate in the March 11 Grandview session, but have a conflict and will not be able to attend
the entire 2 hour session. What is the expected format of the meeting? Will I be able to drop in, hear about the
options, and leave a written comment?
Thanks for your assistance,
Bob McKlveen
5261 Lochloy Dr.
Edina, MN
LJ
Heather Branigin
From: Rachel Thelemann <director @50thandfrance.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 11:18 AM
To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl
@gmail.com
Subject: You are invited...
Good Morning Mayor and City Council Members,
Congressman Ellison will be visiting the 50th & France organics program on Tuesday March 31 from 12 -1pm. We will
start at Edina Grill and give Congressman Ellison a tour of the organic site and introduce him to the 4 participating
restaurants. Hennepin County, City of Edina, and Dick Sanitation will be present in honor of their support for the success
of this program.
It would be great if you could join us.
Please RSVP by Friday if you are able to attend.
Have a great day,
Rachel
Rachel Thelemann I Executive Director
50th & France Business Association I Edina Art Fair
(952)922 -1524 1 directorC@-50thandfrance.com
www.50thandfrance.com I www.edinartfair.com
C]
Heather Branigin 0
From: Alison James <alisonsimonsjames @gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 2:00 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Can we rework so all of our tax $ goes to Hopkins and not Edina?
Dear council members,
I am writing to express my extreme disappointment in your lack of cooperation and interest in addressing the
boundary issues for some of your Edina constituents.
We have organized effectively and spent money and time - that should be given to our children - on efforts to
help untangle and resolve this issue.
I continue to stand behind this movement for many reasons and hope that you are moved to do "the right thing"
and show more support of our effort.
Regards,
Alison James
Alison Simons James
612.483.4783
•
•
•
Heather Branigin
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Good Evening, Mayor,
Bascom, Julie <JulieRogers .Bascom @edinaschools.org>
Wednesday, March 25, 2015 7:48 AM
James Hovland
Two invitations --
I hope you are well. I am hoping that I don't have to dig my shovel out of the back of the
garage to clear my driveway tomorrow morning. Funny, we Minnesotans talk so often about
the weather.
I'd like to invite you to 2 very important happenings in the Edina Schools in April — both which
has to do with engaging young people in being responsible citizens.
April 14 at 2:00 — 2:30 pm. For the first time at one of our schools, South View Middle School
is hosting a citizenship ceremony. Up to 50 new citizens have prepared, studied and passed a
test to become a citizen and will be sworn in on April 14. Our 9th grade government students
will be in attendance as well as the League of Women Voters Edina, who will be registering our
new neighbors to vote. Pretty exciting —the ceremony is a powerful experience and I'm
pleased that one of our schools will be hosting it.
April 28 at 8:30 -9:00 am. Our tenth grade students will be presenting their projects at Edina
High School's Passion Fair— each student has identified a topic they feel passionate about and
have taken some kind of action about this issue. In the past, students have designed water
filters, lobbied for bully free schools and tutored struggling students. Our 10th grade
Language Arts teachers have asked if you would be willing to share a few remarks about the
importance of youth involvement in a strong citizenry.
Thank you for considering these two invitations. I have so appreciated your support and
participation with the work that we are doing in the schools to support students being
involved in their community.
Be well,
Julie
Julie Rogers Bascom
Service - Learning Coordinator
Edina Public Schools
Heather Branigin •
From: Bean, Babette <BabetteBean @edinarealty.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 4:17 PM
To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; 'rsteward @edninamn.gov'; 'swensonannl
@gmail.com'
Cc: Bean, Babette
Subject: Grandview opinion
Hello City Council Members,
am reading about your Grandview development process and I am so upset that you are not
keeping this land as public land for the city. It is an amazing opportunity to beautify Edina and
not go back to more mortar, very unappealing buildings. Can you just not include a private
entity to continue to change the landscape and beauty of Edina? We have an amazing chance
for an improvement to the city here and you are not really listening to what the taxpayers
want for Edina. Taxpayers are tired of your unattractive, commercial additions to what was
once charming. People liked Edina -now it is just one big mess of ugly buildings and concrete
wind tunnels. You are completely ignoring the majority of citizens and not listening.
Very disappointed in your manner of governing and dictating.
Think of your children and grandchildren and maybe go back to taking care of making Edina
special instead of getting so commercial, unattractive and in disrepair. Take care of our streets, •
boulevards and city. I am embarrassed to even drive by the conditions of the roads and center
islands of city hall.
You have a golden opportunity here. Please do not blow it! You still can change your minds
and current path.
Sincerely,
Babette Bean
952- 924 -8722, Realtor
Chairman's Circle
Click here to download my mobile app to find homes
Heather Branigin
• From: Lee Heckenlaible <Iheckenl @gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 12:10 PM
To: James Hovland
Subject: Grandview, I'm in favor of the City's proposals
James,
I have been following the "Citizens for a Better Grandview" but I am 100% in favor of the city's proposals put forth,
This was my last comment to "Citizens for a Better Grandview."
"2 neighbors and I joined the Citizens for a Better Grandview to educate ourselves and see what all sides have to offer. I
commend the group for their ability to assemble and let their voices be heard. The major set back I've seen here is that
the costs involved in the ideas and plans put forth by this group are not being addressed and considered. The lowest
range of a simple park with a few amenities is low millions. The ideas most you were in favor of cost between $SMillion
and peaked out at $50Million (community center) with significant ongoing maintenance costs. The plan the city is going
after promises a significant portion to be public space that can be used by people who never even knew this land existed.
On top of that, it will bring in $100's of thousands of dollars ANNUALLY in tax revenue and potentially well into the millions
for a city with a dying tax base that has barely grown since 1990 (public Edina numbers can be found right on Wikipedia
and through the city). I want this to stay a great city and not be another city troubled by debt for decades. Also, this group
is collectively fighting the city's plan but the reality is that everyone here wants something different and haven't agreed on
a single plan."
Lee Heckenlaible
•5104 West 60th St.
Edina
612- 298 -5594
•
Heather Branigin
From:
Virginia Kearney <vmkearney @msn.com>
Sent:
Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:00 PM
To:
Edina Mail
Subject:
Grandview
To The Mayor and City Council:
We are on the brink of losing a rare piece of public land to commercial development.
Why do Public Grandview and Citizens for a Better Grandview (representing the majority view of Edina
residents) support a public use of the site —such as a comprehensive community center — instead of
privatization?
1. A well -run community center generates revenue. Our research shows that by blending the types of spaces that
tend to generate a profit (fitness areas) with spaces that tend not to (arts and culture), a community can design a
self- sustaining facility.
2. Our research shows that when cities have added major public amenities, they stimulate economic activity and
create better private redevelopment.
3. A 100% public community center could still have private spaces, which could be leased providing ongoing
revenue (e.g. a restaurant, cafe /co- working space, or small shops or services that are compatible with a
community center). •
4. Edina is below the national and regional averages for community and recreation center space.
5. Private development comes with public costs. When pay -as- you -go TIF is involved, tax revenue from the
development is refunded to the developer to pay for pre- approved costs. Some of these costs are related to
necessary public improvements, some simply benefit the developer. The school district, county and other taxing
jurisdictions will forfeit tax revenue from the development for up to 26 years.
6. In Edina, it is possible to conduct a successful capital campaign to raise private funds for a community center.
Other communities have funded major public amenities through a combination of private donations, grants, and
public funds. Private development is not the only option.
The City has lead a five year process toward a 100% privately owned site. Never in those five years has the City
examined the needs and benefits of 100% public use.
Why this Council would agree to privatize the last central public land near transit, despite reams of public input
to the contrary, is a question that every Edina citizen should ask before it is too late.
Virginia Kearney
4226 Grimes Ave. S.
Edina,Mn 55416
952.925.3845 •
• Heather Branigin
From: billjcoop @gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:31 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Public vs Private Grandview use
It is very disappointing to know that Public use /ownership has not been considered a viable option for the
Grandview site. It reminds me again of one of my greatest frustrations with living in Edina, how poorly
planned and utilized our public spaces are -- that our art center is located in a small out of the way space,
which draws only those who directly participate in its programs. Our pedestrian friendly areas like 44th and
50th and France as well as Southdale /Galleria are primarily shopping oriented, rather than cultural.
I would like to see the Grandview area be developed as part of a larger vision for that whole area to connect
to the Library and Senior Center -- to create a cultural and pedestrian friendly area to bring people to. Put in a
theater for music and arts performance. Doing so will only be a boon to the retail spaces already there and
just down the street on France Ave.
I do hope you will reconsider the direction the council has been heading in
William Cooper
4310 Morningside Road
•
Heather Branigin
From: Gail Davis <gailann62 @gmail.com> •
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:07 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject Grandview
City Council:
Please stop the Council plans for the Grandview project.
It is time to listen to the Edina residents.
The majority doesn't like any of the City plans.
Gail Davis
6953 Southdale Road
r�
U
r1
LJ
Heather Branigin
From: Karin Schaefer <karin @mnbeef.org>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 10:34 AM
To: Ross Bintner, James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; swensonannl @gmail.com; Robert
Stewart; Mary Brindle
Subject: Rethink "Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret"
Dear Mr Bintner and the City of Edina's Leadership:
I was disappointed to hear that your public entity has agreed to show and promote an inaccurate movie, called
"Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret." My family and I raised beef cattle in Wright County. I also work for Minnesota's
18,000 beef farmers and ranchers through the Minnesota Beef Council. Our organization is charged with correcting
misconceptions of the general public about how cattle are raise and beef's role in a healthy diet.
It says on your webpage that you will have a discussion after the movie. Have you thought about including an actual beef
farmer or rancher in on that discussion? Have you considered a registered dietitian or University of Minnesota professor?
Have any of your City's staff or leadership actually visited a real life, working farm or ranch? Though I am sure your city
does not have "active' farms within its borders, farms in Minnesota do feed your residents. Farmers in out -state MN do
visit Edina to shop, eat and in my case, give birth to our children in your hospitals. Too often, people who know nothing
about agricultural topics, sciences and technologies are making critical decisions or making public judgments about our
industry.
• SEEK FIRST TO UNDERSTAND!
I have included facts below that may encourage you to reconsider this one sided documentary.
o The entire premise of the film, that the U.N. FAO report Livestock's Long Shadow proved that cows are
causing global warming is flawed. That is NOT the conclusion of the report. Even the statement in the
introduction to the report that global livestock production generates more greenhouse gasses than
transportation, has been recanted by the lead author, Dr. Pierre Gerber.
• Livestock's Long Shadow looks at the impact of ALL livestock production, globally, specific to
greenhouse gas emissions. One major source discussed in the report is deforestation in the
Amazon, which the report concludes is responsible for 1/3 of the GHGs attributed to livestock
production.
• We are not deforesting in the United States to make room for cattle grazing or feed crops
because we developed a production model that reduces the amount of land and feed required to
produce a pound of beef. In fact, we are increasing forest acreage.
• A more recent UN FAO study, published in 2012, documented a global reduction in GHGs from
livestock since the original study (from 18% to 14 %) and pointed to two key areas for further
improvement: feed efficiency and animal health. These are the key strengths of the U.S. beef
production model, which many experts agree is the model for global livestock production.
o Cattle are not a major source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. In fact, their contribution
to global warming is much less than most people think. According to numbers from the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), cattle production is not a top contributor to greenhouse gas emissions.
■ According to the US Environmental Protection Agency in 2011:
• All of Agriculture= 6.9% of total US greenhouse gas emissions.
■ All Livestock =3.1% of total US greenhouse gas emissions.
■ Methane from all livestock =2.8% of total US greenhouse gas emissions.
■ Methane from beef cattle =1.5% of total US greenhouse gas emissions.
■ To compare with other industries:
■ Electricity Generation = 33% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
■ Transportation = 26% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
■ Industrial Use = 11% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
■ Residential and Commercial Use = 8% of total greenhouse gas emissions.
o The beef community agrees that taking care of the environment is very important, Cattlemen and women
believe beef and the environment can exist together without damaging it.
• The beef industry completed a first -of- its -kind sustainability and life cycle assessment (LCA) -
certified by NSF International - that provides benchmarks on its economic, environmental and
social contributions in the United States and a roadmap for the journey toward more sustainable
beef. This research examined the sustainability of the entire US beef supply chain from pasture to
plate and beyond, also examining the impact of food waste on sustainability.
• After two years of data collection and research, the beef community has proven it's on the right
path forward with a 7 percent improvement in environmental and social sustainability from 2005
to 2011. Innovation and enhancements in management and practices have led to some major
improvements in US beef sustainability, such as:
■ 32 percent reduction in occupational illnesses and accidents
■ 10 percent improvement in water quality
■ 7 percent reduction in landfill contributions
■ 3 percent reduction in water use
■ 2 percent reduction in resource consumption and energy use
■ 2 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
Karin Schaefer
Executive Director
Minnesota Beef Council
Office: 763 - 479 -1011
E -mail: karin @mnbeef.org
Visit us on the web: www.mnbeef.org
•
10
0
•
Former Public Works Site Richard &RubyannaPollak
5225 Grandview Sq Apt 102
Discovery Session Edina nary 55436 -1748 March 11, 2015
Please leave your thoughts and ideas to help the design team shape this project.
RI
Z
What I like about this preliminary scenario ...
South Civic
�)
y�
3
r
What I do not like ...
What I do not like
RI
Z
What I like about this preliminary scenario ...
Central Civic
�)
3
What I do not like ...
RI
Z
y Comments regarding the use and programming of the community space,...
u
fn�r�
o
Other comments and suggestions ...
C VVV
•
0
0
What I like about this preliminary scenario ...
North Civic
j
D
W tldonotlike...
y Comments regarding the use and programming of the community space,...
u
fn�r�
o
Other comments and suggestions ...
C VVV
•
0
0
• March 27, 2015
To the Members of Edina City Council,
This letter includes concern about the future of the Former Public Works site, the future of
the Grandview district and my concern about how the Council is approaching this
development process.
As a citizen somewhat new to the Grandview issue, I have been dismayed in finding out how
the process has been handled in the past and how it is moving forward today. But even
more so, I am disappointed in city council response to resident input and questions.
A True Community Center
We have this one rare chance to build a community center in Edina. However, the Council is
making its own decisions about the future of this public land and ignoring the data and input
that the City itself solicited.
I am consistently being told and read that the majority of Edina residents want the
property to be sold and developed. In the hundreds of hours I have scoured city documents,
I find no data to support that claim. In the public meetings I have attended, and Speak Up,
Edina!, there is no data to support that claim.
• If there is data to support the claims being made, please point me to the specific data.
I am also told that the Grandview development will be "true to the concepts embodied in
the Framework that so many Edina residents worked so hard to create."
■ What happened to Implementation Steps 2 -30 on page 51, especially #4- address
programming of community /civic building?
■ What about Grandview Commons on page 29?
■ How do the numbers compare on how many residents helped create the Framework
( -50) vs. how many opinions you have gathered ( >l000)?
One thing the council needs to remember: You did not hold a widely publicized city
meeting until December 203.4. Most Edina residents, like myself, were unaware of the
ongoing Grandview redevelopment process (see Grandview Resident Survey).
When the time came to voice an opinion, our opinions did not matter. Although we were
told at the December 4 meeting that "all options are still on the table," it is obvious they
were not. Even with resounding feedback about wanting a community center, the only
options provided to the public were three scenarios where no one could define what "civic"
space meant. And, the one with the most "civic" space includes a tower and no space for
future transit needs.
• Grandview Development in General
Is the rest of the area already pre- determined? Can my neighborhood look forward to a lid •
and /or a high - density commercial area? Do citizens get any voice in what happens to the
land that isn't public?
As a resident living nearby, I have a real concern that what we will be handed to us is a high -
density area planned by developers and not endorsed by the public. What was supposed to
be a neighborhood center will become a commercial center.
The City Council and Public Input
It is time to stop and reflect upon the position of a city council member. I believe the
Council should serve the public, be public servants who listen to residents and don't rest
upon the laurels of being elected to office.
Here is what the City website says about the city council.
Specifically, the Council is responsible for budgeting, taxation and management of City
property. The Council is accountable to the residents of the Edina.
Frankly, I don't see accountability in the Grandview process, or transparency.
If you are not going to use public input, please don't ask for it, you are creating public
cynicism.
■ Why waste taxpayer money on surveys?
■ Why waste taxpayer time with public meetings?
■ Why form committees such as CAT if you are not going to take their •
recommendations?
It's time to stop the development process at Grandview and assess community needs before
selling our public land.
Thank you foryourtime and consideration of this matter.
Stephanie K. Mullaney
•
• Heather Branigin
From: Route, Neal <nroute @Dominiuminc.com>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 6:39 PM
To: Route, Neal
Subject: Minneapolis, MN - A Mill Artist Lofts Hydroelectric Project
Good afternoon,
Minneapolis Leased Housing Associates IV, Limited Partnership is seeking a Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) minor license to construct and operate the A -Mill Artist Lofts Hydroelectric Project, located
in Minneapolis, Minnesota on the east bank of the Mississippi River at the Upper St, Anthony Falls. The proposed
project would operate in a run -of -river fashion, utilizing existing water rights and infrastructure to generate
approximately 600 kW of electricity for use by residents of a related apartment redevelopment. On March 23rd,
2015 Minneapolis Leased Housing Associates IV, Limited Partnership filed a Final License Application with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission regarding the A -Mill Artist Lofts Hydroelectric Project under Project
Number 14628, As presented in the Final License Application, Minneapolis Leased Housing Associates IV, Limited
Partnership has diligently consulted with both Federal and State agencies, and has completed a fish
entrainment and mortality study, a mussel survey, a study of hydraulic modeling of the downstream channel, a
tunnel conditions report, an infrastructure removal and restoration plan, an environmental assessment, and a
sediment testing plan in relation to agency and public requests.
Complete copies of the Final License Application and related studies are available at the Minneapolis Central
Library located at 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN, at the offices of Minneapolis Leased Housing Associates
IV, Limited Partnership at 2905 Northwest Boulevard Suite 150, Plymouth, MN during regular business hours, and
•on FERC's website under docket number P- 14628. Additionally, the Final License Application is available within
the document center of amillartistloftshydroproject .com by using the password "hydro ". If the application is
found acceptable for filing, the Commission will publish subsequent notices.
Questions or comments regarding the Final License Application for the A -Mill Artist Lofts Hydroelectric Project
may be directed to Owen Metz (ometz @dominiuminc.com or 763 -354 -5618) or Neal Route
(nroute @dominiuminc.com or 763 - 354 - 5640). Interested parties may submit comments to the Secretary of the
Commission in accordance with filing procedures posted on the FERC's Web site at http: / /www.ferc.gov /.
Comments must reference Project Number 14628.
Best regards,
Neal Route
Neal Route
Development Associate
Development & Acquisitions
Dominium
2905 Northwest Blvd, Suite 150 Plymouth, MN 55441
Phone 763 - 354 -5640 Mobile 952 - 836 -5749
DominiumApartments.com
This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.
• For more information please visit http :llwww.mimecast com
Heather Branigin 1 .
From: Tyler Young <tyler.a.young @gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:14 AM
To: James Hovland
Cc: Tara Young
Subject: Grandview Development
Mayor Hovland:
I write regarding the proposed Grandview development. I endorse the development of a community center and strongly oppose any
residential or commercial development. I live at 5037 Windsor Avenue, just south of Our Lady of Grace. In other words, I live right next
door to the Grandview area, so I care about this issue very deeply.
To give you a little background on me, I am a thirty -two- year -old lawyer. Here's my biography, if you are curious. My wife, Tara Young,
and 1 have two young children, Henry (age 3.5) and Helen (age 1.5). My children attend preschool at the Edina Family Center. It's
wonderful: when the weather is nice, Tara and the kids can walk to school. Henry, in particular, loves taking the bridge over Highway 100.
We enjoy walking from our home to Starbucks and the other shopping and dining destinations on Eden Avenue.
I mention all of this because 1 want to emphasize that we really care about the character of our neighborhood. When we moved back to
Minnesota - -I practiced for a few years in Boston after graduating from law school - -we were looking for a specific kind of neighborhood. We
had been living in apartments (or neighborhoods that were dense with apartments) for our entire adult lives. We wanted a traditional single -
family neighborhood experience. We found that in the Melody Lake neighborhood. We plan to be here for a long, long time.
A mixed =age community center on public land would be a wonderful addition to the neighborhood. I know I am not alone in thinking that
this part of Edina is in need of more community space. For me, personally, I would love to have an exercise facility close to home. (As it is
now, I drive over to the YMCA by Southdale to exercise.) But more importantly, I would love to have a community space for children and
young adults to get together and do interesting, stimulating, worthwhile activities. A space dedicated to the performing arts and cultural •
activities would also be a welcome addition to the neighborhood. We have a great town and a great neighborhood. But we have relatively
few spaces to get together as a community, as opposed to as consumers. The Grandview area is one of the last opportunities to create such a
space, and as Edina's population continues to increase we are going to need it more and more.
I strongly prefer and support a community center on public land, but if this land must be privatized, I prefer that its use and development be
limited to a community- center function. My wife and I have joined the Public Grandview community group and support it wholeheartedly.
What we do not need is another office complex or a high - density housing building. You already understand, I am sure, how this would
change the shape and character of the neighborhood. I am taking the time to write this letter --I do not do this often -- because I want you to
understand how passionately I oppose this kind of change. We should build more apartment housing in Edina, to be sure. On that score, I'll
note that another apartment building is almost ready to open near the Southdale Mall. (My wife and I lived at the York Place Apartments by
Southdale for a year while we saved to buy our house.) And it, is in that resident -dense area that Edina should focus on building more
affordable housing.
I have three main reasons for opposing this kind of development. First, I think injecting high - density housing or an office park into the
neighborhood would adversely affect the value of my property. Second, I think this kind of development would significantly increase traffic
on a system of roads that already becomes congested during rush hour. And third, this kind of development would vastly increase the
demand on local resources. By way of example, I frequently use the drive -thru line at Starbucks to get coffee before heading to work in the
mornings. There's already so much demand that the line frequently spills out onto Arcadia Avenue. It doesn't take a genius to see that, if this
development goes through, I am going to have to wait even longer for my morning cup of coffee. I realize that this may seem like a small
concern, but I mention it because this new development would effect a million small changes like this that would make life worse for the
people who actually live in this neighborhood.
1 really cannot overstate how much this issue matters to me as a voter.
I would appreciate the opportunity to speak to you personally about this issue.
Sincerely,
Tyler Young •
,(763)218 -6169
• Heather Branigin
From: David Frenkel < frenkel @att.net>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 10:46 PM
To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl
@gmail.com
Cc: Scott H. Neal; Ric Dressen
Subject: Re: article on Tax Increment financing (TIF) in Edina : TIF -ed off in Edina!
Follow -up TIF article
TIFs are unhealthy for schools and other living things - LeftMN
TIFs are unhealthy for schools an
d other living things -
s F=acing the'F.W- .industrial complex
=v Is mq Preview by Yahoo
David Frenkel
612- 237 -1966
From: David Frenkel <frenkel @att.net>
To: "mbrindle @EdinaMN.gov" <mbrindle @EdinaMN.gcv >; "jhovland @EdinaMN.gov" <jhovland @EdinaMN.gov >;
"kstaunton @EdinaMN.gov" <kstaunton @EdinaMN.gov >; "rstewart @EdinaMN.gov" <rstewart @EdinaMN.gov >;
"swensonannl @gmail.com" <swensonannl @gmail.com>
Cc: Scott H. Neal <sneal @edinamn.gov>
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 12:27 PM
Subject: article on Tax Increment financing (TIF) in Edina : TIF-ed off in Edina!
hftp: / /left.mn /2015 /03 /tif -ed- off -in -ed ina/
This is a story about the use - and perhaps misuse - of TIF (tax increment financing) in Edina. But it is also a story
about poorly understood consequences of TIF use on the other residents of a community, and other taxing
jurisdictions, such as a school board. The story has application to not only Edina, but to other communities where
LeftMN readers live. That's why I hope those of you who don't live in Edina will read it, too.
This story is based on public record information. I sent a copy of it to the City of Edina for comment before
publication; I met with City Manager Scott Neal in his office on March, 25th. I include some of his remarks in this
story. With that preamble, let's begin.
There is a commercial park in southeast Edina called Pentagon Park. Sitting at the junction of Highway 494 and
Highway 100, the 43 -acre expanse is divided into 16 parcels. Fifteen of these parcels are owned by Hillcrest
•Development and related entities, which acquired most of the parcels in 2012 for $7,865,000. The parcels contain
multiple buildings, some of which were considered "substandard." Here are the first few graphs of a story in the
Edina Sun Current when the Pentagon Park TIF district was established in February of 2014:
1
A new Tax - Increment Financing District was established that encompasses the Pentagon Park property.
The unanimous approval of the district by the Edina City Council on Tuesday, Feb. 18, doesn't commit the city to •
any costs and instead lays out the maximum budget for the district. The next step for the district is to draw up a
term sheet and then an agreement.
About 10 percent of the cost of the $500 million Pentagon Park project is expected to be covered by tax increment
financing, according to consultant [for the city of Edina] Mark Ruff of Ehlers and Associates.
The TIF District would be a redevelopment district, and 10 of 18 existing buildings on the property have been
deemed "substandard" by an architectural firm. The Pentagon Park TIF District isn't similar to the Centennial Lakes
TIF District because the Centennial Lakes TIF funds can be used for projects in the city outside of Centennial
Lakes and Pentagon Park TIF funds can't be transferred outside of the district, Ruff said.
A little further in, the article says this:
The financing would be "pay as you go," meaning as Hillcrest Development pays taxes, the city reimburses some
of the taxes, which are then used by the developer to pay its financing institutions, Ruff said, adding that it's "pure
developer financing." No general obligation bonds are involved.
No comments were received from the Edina school district or Hennepin County, which are also affected by the TIF
District. No one opposed the TIF District during the Feb. 18 public hearing.
It sounds like free money, doesn't it? City of Edina economic development staff and its consultant prepared a TIF
plan and presented it for approval on February 18, 2014. The TIF plan said, in part:
The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan
would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such development or
redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing
jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for' test was not met: (p.
2 -8) •
Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax
increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school
district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $36,286,666; (p. 2 -10)
But there was something else going on behind the scenes at the time the TIF plan was being prepared and
submitted. Something that would make the assumptions above very misleading. Before we get to that, though, we
need an understanding of what a TIF district is.
A TIF district is created to induce development or redevelopment that would not otherwise occur, but for the TIF
designation. Here, in other words, a prime piece of real estate at an important intersection in the metro area would
have lain fallow forever "but for" the city's creation of the TIF. Well, maybe. But remember, Hillcrest had
just bought Pentagon Park, and it bought it without the TIF district. And it obviously bought the properties with
redevelopment in mind; one has to be skeptical of the application of the "but for' test here. In our conversation, Mr.
Neal called the "but for" finding by the city council an "informed judgment call."
When a TIF is created, the real estate taxes for the district are frozen, and the taxes payable for any incremental
increase in the assessed value of the property after that (presumably because of development or redevelopment)
are payable to the TIF authority (the HRA in Edina) for the duration of the TIF district (a maximum of 25 years,
although it could be 26 years, since like the first pancake, sometimes the first one doesn't count). Here, that includes
not only the city's share of the increase, but the school district's, the county's, and the watershed district's share,
too.
In the case of the school district, there are actually two levies: one calculated on the Net Tax Capacity (NTC), and
the other is the Referendum Market Value (RMV) levy. The RMV levy is the "operating levy" and it amounts to 43% •
of taxes levied by the school district. The NTC levy accounts for the other 57 %. The incremental NTC taxes levied
are captured by the TIF, while the incremental RMV levy taxes are not. The assessment decreases described
.later do affect both the NTC and the RMV levies and the taxes raised by them.
Mr. Neal explained the difference in the TIF treatment of the NTC and RMV levies when I met with him.
The incremental taxes are rebated one way or another to the developer for the duration of the TIF, either directly for
"eligible expenses" under the TIF /redevelopment plan, or by providing public infrastructure for which the developer
would otherwise be assessed. Just as you, Mr. and Mrs. Homeowner, in Edina, anyway, are assessed for the new
street in front of your house. So it's a great deal for a developer.
But it's not such a great deal for everybody else. In addition to the taxing jurisdictions mentioned, that includes other
owners of similar real estate in the city in competition with the development, and the rest of the taxpayers, too, who
have to pick up any increased load for city services provided for the development during the TIF: fire and police
services, street and sidewalk maintenance, water and sewer maintenance, and safety inspections to name just
some of them. But let's get back to the specific case of Pentagon Park.
According to the TIF plan, and assuming the same degree development, it was estimated that $36,286,666 of tax
money that would have gone to the school district would go to the HRA, and on to the developer because of the TIF.
The city would say that it's fair because the development wouldn't occur "but for" the TIF. As I wrote earlier, I think
that is a questionable assumption. Maybe not "the" development, but some development certainly would occur. The
buyer Hillcrest didn't buy Pentagon Park in 2012 to sit on it.
At the same time the city's staff was preparing the TIF plan showing zero tax consequence to the school district,
members of the city staff, Bill Neuendorf, the Economic Development Manager, Cary Teague, the City Planner, and
James Nelson, a consultant for the developer group, Scott Takenhoff, of Hillcrest Development (the new major
owner of Pentagon Park), and Mark Rauenhorst, a developer who apparently has some interest in the property, too,
were meeting in 2013 and early 2014 to, among other things, discuss the reduction of the assessed valuation of the
Pentagon Park properties_ They were, in fact, reduced from $53,659,400 to $16,299,500, a nearly 70% decrease.
•According to written agendas available, this group met at least eight times, and tax abatement was an agenda item
on seven of these occasions. Takenhoff prepared the written agendas.
Economic Development Manager Neuendorf acted as the liaison for Takenhoff with the city assessor to press
Takenhoff's demands for making the decreases in assessed valuation. There were many email communications
between Takenhoff and Neudendorf on this subject; you can read a couple of them here. Hillcrest also had several
others acting as its agents in communication with the assessor.
In addition, the members of the council and Mr. Neal met with the developer in groups small enough not to trigger
open meeting requirements.
Not only were the values reduced "going forward," but the city stipulated to a settlement of outstanding property tax
petitions by the Pentagon Park ownership to much lower values. Those cases were settled on January 27, 2014,
just a couple of weeks before the TIF plan was adopted and the taxes certified at the new low level.
It certainly seems from the linked emails that the TIF and the tax abatement were intertwined.
Mr. Neal objected strenuously to this characterization in our meeting, stating emphatically and unequivocally that the
TIF and the assessment/abatement issues were separate. He also said that no city employee and no elected official
influenced or attempted to influence assessment decisions by the city's assessor. He said that the assessment
reductions would have occurred with or without the TIF.
No representative of any other jurisdiction with taxing authority over Pentagon Park was part of these discussions.
No one else had any knowledge of them, and certainly not the school district, which actually collects more in real
estate taxes than the city does.
Perhaps the Council didn't even know about them. In a recording of a recent joint Council /School Board working
session, Council Member Ann Swenson can be heard to say, "We didn't reduce the assessments_" If she meant
•"we" the city, she is obviously wrong. If she meant "we" the Council, she is technically correct, but by adopting the
TIF, it froze the school district's taxes at a low level for potentially 26 years.
In the same recording, Economic Development Manager Neuendorf claims to have only the vaguest understanding
of the assessment and tax abatement issue. You can read a transcript of the last few minutes of the working session •
here, starting at page six.
NWiXOM
The assessed valuation of property and taxes payable when a TIF district is declared matter, a lot. By waiting to put
the declaration of the TIF district on the Council agenda until just after the assessed valuations and taxes went way
down, the incremental TIF revenues to the HRA and the developer went way up for the 25 -6 year duration of the
TIF.
As a consequence of the city's stipulated settlement of the tax petitions, the owners of Pentagon Park received a
property tax refund of $4,987,371.90 (for taxes payable in 2011, 2012, and 2013) on the 12 parcels that were the
subject of the protests. The school board recently received a bill for about $1,200,000 for its share of the abatement,
for both NTC and RMV levies. This is already far worse than the zero impact predicted by the TIF plan.
But on top of that, the greatly diminished NTC school taxes will remain frozen and result in substantially less tax
revenue to the school district for a generation, wholly apart from any gains not shared in because of the TIF. Millions
less. The assessment on which NTC taxes to the school district will actually be paid cannot even rise with general
market improvement from the current certified level.
Economic Development Director Neuendorf (who is paid by the city's TIF authority, the HRA, by the way) says that
the values at Pentagon Park "plummeted in the Great Recession," which actually happened, of course, a few years
earlier. I doubt, however, even then, that any other commercial owner (or any property owner in Edina) saw a
diminution in property assessment of 70 %, This was like Macy's after Christmas.
The assessed valuation for taxes payable in 2010 was $53,659,400. The stipulated assessed values in the
settlement were $25,000,000 for taxes payable in 2011, $19,400,000 for taxes payable in 2012, $18,200,000 for
taxes payable in 2013, and $16,300,000 for taxes payable in 2014. (Taxes payable in a given year are based on
assessments made the prior year.) You can see that the assessments decreased in the later years, even as the
time from the Great Recession increased, and real estate values in general were rebounding.
Hillcrest did demolish one of the building in Pentagon Park after it bought the properties, but since the value of many
of the buildings was written down to virtually zero, it is hard to tell how much that accounts, if any, for in these
assessment decreases, especially the later ones. Seven of the buildings have an assessed valuation (apart from the
land) of $1,000; three of them have been improved and are being actively leased.
Mr. Neuendorf observed that Pentagon Park was in foreclosure, and apparently the city assessor took that into
considerable account.
The sale of Pentagon Park was a fire sale, though. This is true of any sale out of foreclosure. The sale prices do not
reflect the real value of properties being sold by financial institutions that are in the lending business, not the real
estate business, and which are just interested in recovering the amount of their bad loans. As a regulatory matter,
the bad loan on the books is worse than the potential upside in holding foreclosed property, especially if money has
to be invested to hold the property or improve it to achieve any gain. Banks are "motivated sellers" as they say in the
biz. They won't throw more money after a bad loan.
-000-
The Pentagon Park TIF district is the inverse of a gift that keeps on giving. It's the buzzard that keeps on eating.
Economic Development Director Neuendorf likes TIFs because, "we can use private money for public
infrastructure." But that is manifestly untrue. TIF- captured taxes are still taxes, diverted to a TIF authority (like the
HRA in Edina) and disbursed to provide benefits for a private entity. TIFs are the opposite of what Neuendorf says.
Using the TIF plan's own figures, the school district will lose out on some $36 million of tax revenue during the life of
the TIF district: dollars that other taxpayers are going to have to pick up. The same is true for money that would
have gone directly into the city's coffers, rather than the HRA; other taxpayers will have to shoulder this load. The •
county will lose its share, too. But because of the substantial assessment markdown, the loss to the school district
will undoubtedly be greater than the $36 million prognosticated.
Compare that $36 million with the $50 million that consultant Ruff is quoted as coming from the TIF in the Sun
Current article quoted at the beginning of this story. If those figures are accurate, and they both come from city
sources, most of the TIF financing is coming from school district levies.
Moreover, many of you know that the Edina School District will have a levy referendum in May to raise some $125
million dollars for repair and capital improvements to school facilities, to permit, among other things, the hot water to
reach the third floor restrooms at Southview Middle School. Guess where the additional NTC mill levy on Pentagon
Park will go? It'll go to feed the buzzard, of course. And that loss will be on top of the losses described in the prior
paragraph.
Taxes that residents voted for specifically in a levy referendum intended for the school district won't go there.
A baby born today in Edina will go through the Edina public schools, go to college, and earn a master's degree
before the buzzard quits feeding. How do you like them apples?
Edina has five TIF districts, including Pentagon Park. It is contemplating a sixth for the development of the former
Grandview public works site. The consequences for the school district are potentially even greater for a TIF at
Grandview, for reasons that will be discussed in a future story here. There probably isn't anything that can be done
about Pentagon Park, but we can certainly use it as a cautionary tale for Grandview.
-000 -
Here's a coda for those of you who aren't Edina residents and have stuck with this story. The one -two punch of
reducing assessed valuation followed by the declaration of a TIF district is hardly limited to the circumstances here
in Edina last year. TIFs are a disaster for public school districts. I'll have more on that later.
•
C7
Richard C. Johnson
5700 Tucker Lane
Edina, MN 55436
March 28, 2015
Jim Hovland
Mayor — City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
To Members of the Edina City Council:
After reading the article in the March I 91 issue of the Edina Sun Current relating to the
proposed use of the former public works property, I timely submitted to the Current the enclosed
"Letter to the Editor." When my letter was not published in the Current's March 26`h issue, I
called the Current's Community Editor and left a message with him about the "oversight." So
far, I have not received a response, but assuming that the Council looks forward to hearing yet
another voice relating to the subject use, I thought it was incumbent on me to provide it.
Sincerely,
Dick Johnson, a "trusted" Trustee
and then a member of the Council in
the "olden days ", i.e., the bygone era.
•
•
Letter to the Editor, Sun Current, March, 2015
It is time for the Edina City Council to press the reset button, and, without consultants,
develop a new and fresh vision for the use of the former public works property. It is important
that that vision consider the impact of traffic which would result by the proposed use. According
to the Sun Current the three mixed -use development proposals would include retail shops,
restaurant space, housing (presumably in highly -built buildings), and commercial and office
spaces. Those uses would generate a significant increase in the traffic using the adjacent streets,
Eden Avenue and Brookside Avenue. Accordingly, I pose this query: How many more cars can
those two -lane streets accommodate without causing rush hour traffic jams?
Another aspect of that vison should include: What is the best use of the property for
those who live here? Do we really need more buildings for business - related purposes — and
housing is business - related, when we already have abundant, similar businesses throughout
Edina? I also pose this question: What's wrong with a low density use of the property for a
park? There are many other needed low density uses, including a building for the Edina
Historical Society. Presently, the administration along with the historical materials are crammed
in an old house the Arneson's gifted to Edina many moons ago.
r�
Richard C. Johnson
•
Heather Branigin •
From: Monica Holman <monicacathryn @msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:26 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Grandview
I agree with the comments I read regarding using the Grandview space for public uses such as a community
center. I also want to know, why is there no green space to speak of in these plans? The last thing Edina needs is
more retail and restaurant space. Most of us in edina are trying hard to raise families on a budget, and we need
more opportunities to build community and recreate with our families. Most of our parks are great but there is
an obvious lack of affordable activities that most community centers provide. We do not need more places to go
shopping and drink wine. Please consider revising these plans with the values of our families in mind.
Monica Holman
Sent liom my Veria n Wireless 46 L rE smartphone
J
0
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
• Minneapolis VA Health Care System
One Veterans Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55417
March 13, 2015
Mr. Scott Neal
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Neal,
This letter is to recognize and express our "thank you" to the employees at the Braemar Golf Facility
for their willingness to help our military Veterans from the Polytrauma Rehabilitation program at the
Minneapolis VA Hospital.
Each winter and summer the golf professionals from various twin city golf courses volunteer their
time to instruct our Veterans in the game of golf. This program is an "adaptive golf program." It has
been thoroughly enjoyed by all our Veteran who have participated since the program began in 2011.
• This year we found ourselves without a facility to finish our 5 week curriculum. We contacted your
staff at Braemar, and thru the generosity of Mr. Joe Abood we were able to complete our winter
program. This donation of range time and golf balls was appreciated by the Veterans, VA staff, VA
volunteer, and PGA Professionals.
In addition, we would like to extend our gratitude to Mr. Joe Greupner for his help in assisting us with
our weekly needs and reserving necessary space. We would also like to thank Mr. Alex Holderson for
being on point weekly to help us set up our equipment and moving our veterans in and out of the
Braemar Dome facility.
Your Braemar Staff were instrumental in making our weekly visits for this program a fun, educational,
and experiential experience, as they all look forward to the ongoing learning.
Respectfully,
Kristin Powell, CTRS
Polytrauma TBI Outpatient Recreation Therapist
Minneapolis VA Hospital
• Cc: Mr. Joe Abood General Manage, Mr. Joe Greupner PGA Club Professional, and Mr. Alex
Holderson Braemar Golf Dome
Heather Branigin 1 •
From:
Erik Scheurle <gma343 @gmail.com>
Sent:
Wednesday, April 01, 2015 4:23 PM
To:
Edina Mail
Subject:
66 West
Dear Mayor Hovland,
Thank you for your past support of 66 West. I understand that the city council is
considering a capital contribution to help make this apartment building a reality, to get
39 youth on track to transform their lives. $500,000 from the City of Edina would be a
powerful statement, and act as leverage to help Beacon secure the other funding
necessary to build and provide services at 66 West. I certainly hope you will support
this investment in our future. Thank you,
Erik Scheurle
, member of the Housing Task Force at Edina Community Lutheran Church
gma343 6d-)gmail.com
•
•
i
0
Pi
•
Heather Branigin
From: David Frenkel <frenkel @att.net>
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 9:31 PM
To: Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl
@gmail.com
Cc: Scott H. Neal
Subject: Total Wine accuses city -owned competitors of antitrust conspiracy
Clare Kennedy
Total Wine & More, the big -box liquor retailer that battled its way into the Twin Cities last year, says
its city -owned competitors are breaking state and federal antitrust laws by coordinating prices to
squeeze the company.
The Potomac, Md. -based chain sent a cease -and- desist letter in late February to nine cities with
municipal liquor stores: Apple Valley, Brooklyn Center, Eden Prairie, Edina, Lakeville, Richfield,
Rogers, Savage and St. Anthony.
The city attorney for Edina and Lakeville, Roger Knutson, said his two clients sent a response denying
the allegations.
Total Wine accuses city -owned competitors of antitrust conspiracy - Minneapolis Z St. Paul Business
Journal
Total Wine accuses city -owned competitors of antitrust
conspiracy - Minneapolis/ St. Paul Business ...
Tut.:al Wile AKY More, tho big -box liquor retailer that battlecl its way into the
Twin Cities last year, says its eity- owned competitors are brealanng state an
cl federal antitrust hntvs by coordinating prices to squeeze the cotiipaniy.
Vieya :7r „�n;tststounz<-sls,ct�m
David Frenkel
612- 237 -1966
Previev” by YahOp
Heather Branigin
•
From: Jackie Sullivan <sullivan6832 @comcast,net>
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 2:53 PM
To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com
Subject: 66 West - 39 apartments for youth 18 -22 experiencing homelessness
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
write this letter in support of the City of Edina making a significant contribution toward the capital costs of 66 West, the
affordable housing project being developed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. A capital contribution of
$500,000 will leverage other public funding needed to build this housing. Beacon will apply to the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency in June. A capital contribution by the City of Edina will enhance Beacon's application for the limited state
capital funds administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
City staff have recommended using Tax Increment Financing as the vehicle for providing the $500,000 capital
contribution for 66 West. The City Council Work Session on April 7th will consider this funding structure, and an early
decision will benefit Beacon's MFHA application.
I am grateful to the City Council for approving the zoning and land use issues allowing the development to move
forward. Now, I ask for your continued support as the plan to raise capital is formulated, allowing the project to actually
be built and serve young adults experiencing homelessness in Edina and surrounding suburbs.
I have been a resident of Edina for 27 years, and I am an active member of St. Stephen's Church at Wooddale and 50`h
Street. I understand the need for affordable housing in Edina, and trust that we will take actions to help all of the youth •
of our community have an opportunity to thrive.
Many thanks for your consideration!
Jackie Sullivan
6832 Gleason Road, Edina
9
To: MAYOR & COUNCIL
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: April 7, 2015
Subject: Correspondence
Action Requested:
No action is necessary.
�,91N�11�
O e
y
Agenda Item #: IX. A.
Action ❑X
Discussion ❑
Information ❑
Attachment:
Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
•
•
Heather Branigin
From: Stephanie K. Mullaney <stephaniemuIlaney @comcast.net>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 3:57 PM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Edina City Council
Attachments: city - council - letter- CBG- PG.docx
April 1., 2ozS •
To the Members of Edina City Council,
The current Grandview development scenarios commercialize the public's land and ignore the input of
the majority of Edina residents. As chairs of Citizens for a Better Grandview and Public Grandview, we
therefore respectfully request the following:
1. Stop /pause the work with Frauenshuh
z. Begin a needs assessment for a true community center, based on community input /needs
and the use of data gathered in surveys sponsored by the City
3. Implement a feasibility and cost study regarding a community center
This document outlines the reasons that we request the Council to pause the current development with
Frauenshuh:
I. A Flawed Process
II. Lack of use of Public Input
III. Undefined Terminology
IV. Community Center Concepts
V. Livable city concepts
VI. Accountability of the City Council
The Grandview process has been fraught with controversy since its inception. This is due to the fact
that citizens see public land as a shared and precious resource. The privatization of the former public •
works site will reflect poorly on both the city council and the developer(s) now and into the future. This
issue will not be forgotten by residents.
We would like the opportunity to meet with representatives of the Council priorto the April 22
meeting. Please contact Stephanie Mullaney at stephaniemullaneyCa comcast.net or
9S2-92S -sS69 to set up a meeting.
Thank you.
Respectfully,
Kim Montgomery Stephanie Mullaney
Chair, Citizens for a Better Grandview Chair, Public Grandview
Attachments: Consolidation of Findings— Process Shortfalls
Consolidation of Findings— Public Input
I. A FLAWED PROCESS
0
■ The Grandview development process has been slanted toward private development
from the start; none of the city's data supports this process.
■ The Grandview Guide Plan process resulted in vaguely worded Seven Guiding
Principles; the original intent of these principles have been misapplied and
misinterpreted.
■ A true Small Area Plan was never developed. The City accepted a Metropolitan Council
Livable Cities grant for $loo,000 and did not fulfill the application goals or develop a
Small Area Plan.
■ The Grandview District Development Framework (Framework) is consistently
referenced, but has not been followed:
o No process to define a community building
o Neighborhood center concept redefined to neighborhood commercial center
o No transit /transportation plan
o Not walk-able/bike-able or connected
o Not within Comprehensive Plan Guidelines for height and density
■ The City has consistently ignored or misinterpreted its own Grandview data. The -three
development scenarios bear no resemblance to what a majority of residents want for
• the area.
■ Attached is a document Consolidation of Findings — Grandview Process and Shortfalls
created by Public Grandview that outlines some of the inconsistencies and lack of
fulfillment of the Comprehensive Plan, the Guide Plan Process and the Grandview
District Development Framework.
0
II. RESIDENT INPUT
Resident input is being ignored, suppressed and misrepresented by the City. The City has
ignored the data from the Grandview Residents Survey, Community Needs Assessment, over
zoo letters to the Council, public comments on Speak Up, Edina! and input from the December
4 and March 11 meetings.
December 4 Meeting
The first "Exploration Session" held December 4 has already been discussed at a Council
meeting. To summarize, it was a poorly run meeting, with tedious activities for the attendees
and resulted in little dialogue between the facilitators and the public.
The Confluence meeting report reflects that a majority of attendees want a community center
with functions ranging from exercise and fitness to arts and culture, with a prominent green
space. From the March 11 scenario results, this input was ignored.
March = Meeting
■ No voting option was presented to attendees (beyond going home) if they did not like
any of the scenarios presented. This constitutes a lack of true feedback and unreliable
data. In addition, station representatives did not appearto take notes.
•
■ The City has presented no data from green dot voting or the yellow feedback forms. •
■ The green dot data collected by Citizens for a Better Grandview reflects the majority of
attendees did not like ANY of the options. This information is not reflected in any
communication from the City. The green dot data was submitted to the city clerk for
public record on March 13, 2015.
■ Contrary to the meeting report from the city manager, there was little chance to ask
questions during the presentation. People raising their hands were told to hold their
questions for representatives atthe stations. The developer's representatives did not
welcome resident's questions.
■ By putting off questions until the small groups, attendees could not benefit from
hearing other resident's perspectives and questions and there was no accountability for
the answers given.
Please see attached Consolidation of Findings— Public Input that summarizes community input
through February 2015.
III. UNDEFINED TERMINOLOGY •
The following terms have been published and used by City representatives without clear
definitions of what the terms mean.
Mixed Use— people use this term in different ways. One resident used "mixed use" to
refer to a community center that contains recreation, arts and culture functions.
Public space
Private space
Civic space
Leverage
IV. COMMUNITY CENTER CONCEPT
The City has taken public input about a community center and made it appear as if there is no
agreement on what a community center would contain.
Creating four different scenarios of a community center— a recreation center, arts and culture
center, performing arts center OR a multi - purpose space results in a competitive mentality.
The most oft mentioned uses, (recreation /fitness. arts and culture, a multi - generational
community center) cited in the City's recent presentations are compatible and could fit
together on the site if the city allows the site to stay public for a public use.
• Edina is far behind its neighboring suburbs; the preliminary Parks and Recreation Strategic
Master Plan shows Edina in the bottom tier both regionally and nationally for community and
recreation centers.
VII. THE CONCEPT OF A LIVABLE CITY
The Frauenshuh -led development process has resulted in no development scenario that is
community - friendly or that respects the public realm.
The livable city concept is being used in many cities and countries to build healthy, connected
communities. Members of the Steering Committee understood the importance of a livable
community when they approved the Framework:
For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major
new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area of all stakeholders, value to real estate,
and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District.
A forward- thinking Edina would take into account a vision of Edina as a people- centered
community, notjust a commercial center. Charles Montgomery says:
The city... "should enable us to build and strengthen the bonds between friends, families and
strangers that give life meaning, bonds that represent the city's greatest achievement and
opportunity."
That is a livable city. That is what the majority of Edina residents want.
Only a city that respects human beings can expect citizens to respect the city in return.
Enrique Penalosa
It is the citizenry's right to a healthy life- giving public realm that has trumped anyone's right to
kill it.
Charles Montgomery
Sprawl repair... links streets to surrounding networks, making walking easier and extending
tendrils of easier living, good health, sociability and connectivity. It offers truly public space —that
is owned and controlled by the local municipality, not the mall owner or developer.
Galina Tachieva
Livable city experts:
■ Enrique Penalosa — Innovative Former Mayor of Bogota who transformed his city.
■ GalinaTachieva — AuthorofSprawlRepairManual.
■ Charles Montgomery— Author of Happy City
VI. ACCOUNTABILITY
0
A lack of data -based decision making has pervaded the Grandview process. As a result, the City 0
• has put itself in a position of defending a process with statements that are unsupported by
facts, unaware of its own history and lack of fulfillment of its documented goals.
It appears from the beginning that the intent was to involve a commercial developer. The
process never allowed for discussion of l00% public use on the former public works site.
The following is a short list of the lack of adherence to plans. A more detailed list is available
upon request.
■ LCDA grant: The City spent $iooK of taxpayer money on a process and document that
achieved none of the six goals in the grant application and did not achieve the overall
goal of creating a Small Area Plan.
Grandview District Development Framework (Framework): Year one implementation
plans: Three years after Framework approval, the only implementation step
accomplished is the approval by the Council April zolz.
The three development scenarios bear no resemblance to the Framework vision of a
community building with an outdoor plaza and some housing elements. The
neighborhood center envisioned by the Framework becomes a commercial center with
some "civic" space.
• The City has misrepresented data to support its predetermined end for this process. The
following is a short list of misrepresentations. A more detailed list is available upon
request.
■ Sun Current article — March 201.5
This week in an email, Neuendorf said that a loo percent publicly -owned option was
considered by a subcommittee of a go- member Community Advisory Team, but the
majority of that group did not accept the all - public option.
This statement is false. Members of Citizens for a Better Grandview were at every CAT
II meeting. The question was never brought to a vote. In fact, the input that was
brought forward from the May so, zoii Community Conversation suggesting public
uses was never discussed.
■ Scott Neal in his Friday Report— March zo, 2015
Grandview Site Planning
The 2nd of three large public sessions to discuss the future uses of the City -owned parcel
was completed Wednesday, March ii. Approximately soo people participated. The
"DiscovcrySession "was formatted to provide ample opportunityforpublicinput
. Consultants summarized the ideas gathered to -date and showed illustrations of how
mixed -uses might be configured on the site. Many audience questions were answered
during the presentation: The second half of the session included nine different stations •
staffed by members of the design team. Participants were able to ask questions, provide
comments and ideas and express concerns directly to the design team...
This is not an accurate reflection of what happened at the meeting. Mr. Neal was not at
the meeting. The developer's representatives did not welcome questions during the
presentation. By delaying questions to station discussions, there is no data or
accountability for the answers.
■ Several Errors with Website Communications
The following errors could have affected the ability for residents to add input and/or
misrepresented the process.
• Location of March:Li meeting was reported in 3 different places
• Website was not updated in time for postcard drop.
• Once updated, the link to Speak Up, Edina! did not work.
• Pictures of three development scenarios were not correct aspect ratio, making
the tower on the North Civic Tower scenario appear about a third of the height
that it is.
•
0
0 Heather Branigin
•
From: Dornfeld, Joanna (GOV) <Joanna.Dornfeld @state.mn.us>
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 8:40 PM
To: James Hovland
Cc: Weber, Emily M (GOV)
Subject: Transportation Bill Comparison
Attachments: 2015_03_23_GOP Transportation Plan GMD compare for Jim Hovland.docx
Mayor Hovland,
My colleague, Emily Weber, said you were looking for information comparing the GOP vs. the
Senate /Governor's transportation plans. Attached is a chart that provides some of the distinctions. I admit it is
still very much in draft form as I am waiting on language from the GOP that will be released tomorrow, but I
am not certain how quickly I will be able to update it so I wanted to send you what I currently have. Please let
me know if we can provide any additional assistance. I know Met Council staff would also be more than happy
to assist with a draft as well.
Joanna Dornfeld I Assistant Chief of Staff
Office of Governor Mark Dayton & Lt. Governor Tina Smith
116 Veterans Service Building
20 W 12 Street
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Office: 651 - 201 -3423 1 Cell: 651 - 343 -8216 1 Fax: 651 - 797 -1873
Working to Build a Better Minnesota
Web I Twitted Facebook
DISCLAIMER: This e -mail is intended to be read only by the intended recipient. It may contain confidential and /or
privileged information, and may be protected from disclosure by law. If you are not the intended recipient, any review,
dissemination, retransmission, distribution or copying of this e-mail (or its attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you
received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments.
March 23, 2015
GOP Transportation Plan
Comparison to Governor /Senate Plan
Funding Source
How Funds are Allocated Over
Governor
Senate
10 Years
Road and Bridge
$3.4 billion for Trunk Highway
• 63% of Governor plan
SAME AS GOVERNOR
• Dedication motor vehicle parts
System
Gross Receipts Tax: 6.5 %, $2.50 floor
$822 million for County State Aid
• 52% of Governorrplan
sales tax - $2.6 B
FY16: $352 M; FY17: $463 M
• Trunk Highway Bonds - $1.3 B
Highways
Registration Fees: 1.25% to 1.5 %, plus
$255 million for Municipal State
• 52% of Governor plan
• Pay for existing MnDOT /DPS
base fee increase by $10
costs with General Fund rather
Aid Streets
FY16: $73.5 M; FY16: $107 M
• 52% of Governor plan
than Trunk Highway fund -
$588 M
$128 million for counties, cities
• One -time General Fund - $150
and townships
M
Governor is committed to working with
$XX surcharge on vehicle registration
the Legislature to secure funding for
fee; $10 surcharge on vehicle
small cities and tribal governments.
registration renewal filing fee; dedicates
$3.50 of existing $10 other vehicle
transaction filing fee; and directs $3
Small Cities Road and Bridge
vehicle transfer fee
• Dedicate 9.2% GF Tax on Rental
$281 millionfor small cities with
FY16 -17: at least $52 M, plus $XX
Vehicles - $231 million
populations less than 5,000
surcharge on vehicle registration fee
• One -time General Fund - $50
Establishes two special revenue
million
:
accounts for city streets and bridges
• Small city streets and bridges
account (cities under 5,000)
r
• Larger city streets and bridges
x:
account
The 5 suburban counties receive nearly
The 5 suburban counties receive nearly
$20 million per year under the
$20 million per year under the
Five Suburban Counties Road and
Governor's proposal.
Governor /Senate proposal.
Bridge
Plus the entire Motor Vehicle Leased
• Dedicate 50% Motor Vehicle
$140 million for five suburban
Sales tax is dedicated for 7 metro
Leased Sales Tax - $125 million
counties for county roads
counties according to population except
• One -time General Fund - $14
Hennepin County based on 25% of
million
population and Ramsey County based
on 50% of population
• FY16: $51 M; FY17: $53 M
Greater Minnesota Transit
$140 million for Greater
$120 million for Greater Minnesota
$XX million
0 0 is
0 0
March 23, 2015
• Dedicate 50% Motor Vehicle
Leased Sales Tax - $125 million
• One -time General Fund - $14
million
Minnesota transit
Transit will serve 90% of the projected
need by 2025 and will fund 500,000
additional hours of service annually.
Sen. Dibble will be amending this
portion of his bill when he hears it
in his committee in the next few
weeks.
$1.05 B available for local city,
county and township roads and
City and County Roads and Bridges
bridges beginning in FY2017.
• GO Bonding - $1.05 B
Anticipates $250 M in FY17 and
$100 M per year thereafter in
GO bonding for transportation.
%Z cent'7- county metro area. sales tax to
3/ cent metro area sales tax in five
the Met Council
counties (excludes Scott and Carver)
• $280 M per year
• FY16: $233 M; FY17 $366 M_
GOP Proposal will cause:
• 5% to CTIB for grants to
Metro Transit
• Short term cuts existing bus service
counties for capital and
• 6.5% GF Tax Associated with
$163 M for Metropolitan Transit
and dial -a -ride services,
operating costs for transit
vehicle rental to - $163 M
Capital (it is unclear what these
approximately 15% reduction of
improvements
• Proposes a $723 M general
funds are for until we see bill
service by 201,81 .,
• 95% to Met Council for
fund cut to Met Council over 10
language)
• Met Council will be unable to fund
transitway development and
years
-$723 M GF reduction over 10
state share, for 20 new transitways.
expanding bus service; 1/8 of
• Shifts $30 M plus annually from
years
• Long term continued cuts to regular
Met Council's funds to counties
CTIB transitway capital
$350'M,: CTIB capital funds
route bus service and extending
for roads with a nexus to
development to existing
shifted to existing operations
cuts to Metro Mobility.
transit;
transitway operations
Aii
• 10% to total 1 cent sales tax
'
revenue for bike /ped
I
Repeals statutory requirement that
the state pays 50% of operating
costs of light rail transit.
"This does not include the $628 M from MnDOT's unreserved fund balance or additional federal funds.
Heather Branigin •
From: Stephanie K. Mullaney <stephaniemullaney @comcast.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:29 AM
To: Edina Mail
Subject: Addition to correspondence yesterday
Attachments: Consolidation -of- findings - public- input.pdf, Consolidation-of - findings - process-
shortfalls.pdf
I sent an email /letter to the city council general email yesterday and mistakenly forgot to add the
attachments.
Please add the attached documents to my submission from yesterday.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thank you.
Stephanie Mullaney
Chair, Public Grandview
•
40
•
•
•
PUB IC
GRANDVIEW
CONSOLIDATION OF FINDINGS
PUBLIC INPUT
•
LETTERS TO THE CITY COUNCIL IN 2014
Letters sent: 71
Included statement in favor of a community center:
48 68%
Opposed to partnering with a private developer:
38 54%
Included statement in favor of open, public process or
concern about community input being ignored:
16 23%
Included statement opposed to community center /public use:
4 6%
See bibliography page for city documents containing letters:
http: / /www. publicgrandview.com /resources /bibl iog ra phy- documents/
4r CITIZENS FOR A BETTER GRANDVIEW (CBG)
ENDORSEMENTS
Data as of May 18, 2014.
Endorsements were attached in a letter to the City Council from CBG chair.
Number of CBG endorsers: 123
Number of endorsers that are NOT represented by letters, above: 41
http : / /abettergrandview.weebly.com/
See bibliography page for city documents containing letter:
http: / /www. p u bl i cg ran dview. com/ resources /bibliography - documents/
CONCLUSION from the above two data sources
The City was provided with letters or data from /about 114 unique citizens regarding
Grandview development. Only 4 of them were a private /public or private development.
•
2 4/7/15
•
4 SPEAK UP, EDINA!
Data as of February 13, 2015
The following data includes posts to the discussions Ideas for Reuse and Public Elements. The data only includes posts
that contain an opinion about Grandview, not simply statements or requests for information.
Ideas for Reuse
http://sl2eakupedina.org/ discussions /redevelopment -of- the - former - public - works- site- exploratory-phase /topics /ideas-
for -reuse
Number of posts:
25
Number endorsing community center:
9
36%
Number endorsing retaining public land:
11
44%
Number concerned about traffic / transportation
6
24%
Number for mixed use:
3 (2)
12% (8 %)
Number against community center:
2
8%
* Public Grandview spoke with one author, and she stated the only reason
she brought up mixed use is because she
thought that there was no way we were going to get a community center.
She is currently a supporter of Public
• Grandview, and a previous supporter of Citizens for a Better Grandview, in
favor of a community center.
Public Elements
http: / /speakupedi na. org /discussions /redevelopment -cf- the - former -pubI ic- works- site -expl oratory- phase /topics /pubIi c-
elements
Number of posts:
19
Number endorsing community center:
14
74%
Number endorsing retaining public land:
4
21%
Number concerned about traffic / transportation
3
16%
Number for mixed use:
1
5%
•
The Funding and Post Other Ideas Here! did not contain enough opinion information about what residents
want to see done with the Grandview property.
3 4/7/15
DATA FROM DECEMBER 4 PUBLIC MEETING
Exploration Session for Edina residents
http: / /bit.ly /1 zy9VM D
Attendance: 130
Word cloud generated for oppportunities:
Parkipg:uodelglouod
Wormed ing /galhefiog -space
food /Retail /cafe'
C i4?t�-P�hs�11e s«��
cu
u � left!; o�
Public Sac'elGather� S' acelPlaalS ua«
q
�� � � -�� A�tlCul���al- Ce�terilhea�e�
Gfeep-Space
Total number of responses:
Number of responses that were congruent with public use
(words such as Performing Arts, Art Gallery, Fitness, Green Space)
Number of responses that named items such as community
center, a public gathering space, park or that are congruent with a
multi - purpose community center
Number of responses that included private use or housing
(non likely uses such as zoo, gun range, lake, factory)
Number of responses that included housing
(includes affordable housing, senior housing)
Number of responses asking for retail or restaurant
422
249 59%
195 46°%
36 1 %
7 2%
6 1%
Areas of interest— these were included in the above numbers but stand out with respect to the audience's
concern / preferences:
Transportation /Parking: 21 Outdoor element: 13 Green /Architectural concerns: 16
4 4/7/15
•
•
•
•
DATA FROM EDINA HIGH SCHOOL MEETING
January 15, 2015
Exploration Session for Edina High School students
http: Hb it. I y/ 1 MMk7Ki
Attendance: 90 students
Word cloud for opportunities
0
A
Sustainable w
Skate -park
alCommunai space
Hub Performance -space v 9 unique
Ice- rink Sports /recreation.Ywfil v �wN P - r` Attraction
Community- centeri►owe "Wa(kin�yy/piece-r�ahJ
i n c. -;n r _ 1 p
G reen ._ Public sCo" aff e ran""k"t1H1n_1___
`— `agPat' °QRetail
Number of responses
308
Number of responses items congruent with public use 164 53%
(words such as Performing Arts, Art Gallery, Fitness, Green Space}
• Number of responses that named items such as community 246 80%
center, a public gathering space, park or that are congruent with a
multi - purpose community center
Number of responses asking for retail or restaurant 55 18%
Number of responses that included private, mixed use 24 8%
Number of responses that included housing of some type 8 3%
Number of responses that unlikely outcomes 10 3%
(i.e. gun range, go- carts, zoo, lake)
NOTE: The highest number of responses were Cafe /Restaurant (33) and Community Center (22).
Official comments from the report:
The Public Space category was overall most preferred as a whole category. The students seemed to prefer
public spaces with more green space.
General Assessment: Similarly to the adultlmixed -age participants, the student participants expressed the
desire for this site to include a community focus, with community /rec- center component (24.4% of
• participants support). The student participants had more focus on sports and recreation (11.1 %) and also
expressed the desire for an ice rink (13.3°6).
5 4/7/15
SURVEYS SPONSORED BY CITY OF EDINA
Community Grandview Resident Survey
February 2014 http: / /bit.ly /1 FODaSi
May 2014 (final) http: / /bit.ly /1JmRhB7
80
70
60
so
40
30
20
10
0
Na JM NiM1Oc Laic lwtmOwlW Mao F+wgM1 Rat pn
vMm onar wn M.ar nes�nm=a+u+ir
Agree �Disagrea
The Moms Leatherman Company
Value Statements 1
2014 City of Edina
120
100
00
60
40
20
0 _
Sonw of COnnn M1^P Ibn CCOnuN1Y 9pM:m Mon Rec OPPM1 Mon CWM1VWM ePW
mAgrea WDisegree
The Mortis Leatherman Company
Value Statements II
2014 City of Edina
6 4/7/15
Do not sell public land: 61 %
Public purposes only: 66%
Sense of community important: 93%
More community spaces: 55%
More rec opportunities: 68%
More cultural /art opportunities: 72%
Support: 44%
Strongly support: 9%
Oppose: 28%
Strongly oppose: 12%
When this data was summarized in the
final report (May 2014), it used only the
strongly support/oppose figures, which
shows a slight preference to oppose.
• I
0
�A
• Comprehensive Community Needs Assessment
October 2014
httl2:Hbitly /17yG27r
Potential Indoor Program spaces Respondent Households Would Use
Walking and Jogging Track 58%
Exercise facility for adults > 50 years 34%
Aerobics /fitness /dance class space 33%
Weight room / cardiovascular area 33%
Potential Indoor Programming Spaces that Respondent Households Would Use the Most Often
Walking and Jogging Track 47%
Exercise facility for adults > 50 years 27%
Aerobics /fitness /dance class space 20%
Weight room / cardiovascular area 20%
Respondent Household Level of Support for an Indoor Community Space with the
Programs they Would Use the Most Often Being Developed on Part of the Vacant Land
Near Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue
• Very supportive of an indoor community space 51%
Somewhat supportive 22%
Not sure 18%
Not supportive 10%
Q15. Respondent Household Level of Support for an Indoor Community
Space with the Programs they Would Use the Most Often Being Developed
on Part of the Vacant Land Near Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue
by W mtage of respondents (excluding not provdao
some.w suppc
22%
Very supportive
51%
Srwcc' Hsu: Virnn.'ETC In:u�vs l,�U C9q� /Edina fO.��lu?nIJI
Not sure
1 B%
Not supportive
10%
7 4/7/15
Bibliography and Notes •
9
Speak Up, Edina
Report from December 4 Public Meeting
Report from January 15 EHS Meeting
Community Grandview Resident Survey, February 2014
Community Grandview Resident Survey, May 2014 (final)
Comprehensive Community Needs Assessment, October2014
http: / /www.sr?eakupedina.or
http: //b it.ly /1 zy9V M D
http: / /bit.ly /1 MMk7Kj
http: / /bit.ly /1 FODaSi
http: / /bit.ly /1 JmRhB7
http: / /bit.ly /1 Agd2eA
Note: The majority of data and resources are from January 2014 to approximately February 20, 2015.
Documentation prior to 2014 can be found on the CitizensforaBetterGrandview .weebly.com or the City of
Edina's website.
Links to all documents can be found on the bibliography page on
http• / /www publicgrrandyiew.com/ resources /bibliography- documents/
Please note that the numbers supplied in this document in the SpeakUpEdina.org section and the Public
Meeting section have been analyzed with diligence and a best effort for accuracy. However, there may be
minor errors due to fact that all the information had to be gathered and analyzed manually.
•
is
8 4/7/15
0
•
PUB IC
G- RAN DVIEW
CONSOLIDATION OF FINDINGS
GRANDVIEW PROCESS &
SHORTFALLS
•
ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT
There are hundreds of documents in the public realm about the Grandview development
process. This document tries to distill the information into a workable size, examining major
documents such as the Grandview District Development Framework (also referred to as the
Framework), but also including smaller City correspondence and events.
The following issues are outlined in this document:
1. There was never a Small Area Plan put forth. In spite of its consideration in early
and documented discussions, a Small Area Plan was never presented as an option
for determining redevelopment.
2. Most of the implementation steps in the Grandview District Development
Framework document have not been completed.
3. The City moved forward with a private developer despite input from the advisory •
team and similar public input recommending partnering with an independent
consultant as opposed to a private developer. A 6 -2 majority of the Citizen
Advisory Team (CAT) members recommended using an independent consultant.
In general, the Grandview development process appears to be fraught with a lack of follow
through. The process also seems to be following an agenda separate from the Framework
and its principle of "community -led" process.
The City has many instances of public data (see http / /bit.ly /l AE29zU) that reveal that the
majority of Edina residents would like the site to remain publicly owned and used principally
for a public purpose The majority supports building a multi - purpose, multi - generational
community center.
0
Page 2 4/7/15
CONDENSED TIMELINE OF GRA DVIEW
REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS
2007 City attempts to do land swap with Opus. This process failed.
2008 February 27: Planning Commission meeting: Members Staunton, Fisher and
Schroeder, who would later call for and lead the Grandview small area plan
process, called for residential mixed use on the site. (Source: video of meeting)
2009 Edina's current Comprehensive Plan identifies Grandview as a "Potential Area of
Change in the City." The plan was adopted in September 2009.
2009 Council approves a process to engage the community in planning of the future
of the Public Works site — Community Advisory Team (CAT). This was CAT I
team.
2010 December: CAT I presents to city council - Grandview District Small Area Guide
is Plan Process - Report to Planning Commission and City Council. This resulted in
adoption of the Seven Guiding Principles with which to move forward when
creating a small area plan. The Small Area Guide Plan Process also outlines
requirements of the Small Area Plan, including a community needs analysis,
and other studies.
0
2010 July— Application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant
for small area planning process
2011 March 1: Proposal for Grandview District Small Area Plan Process. Steering
Committee aka CAT II begins work April 2011
2012 January 2012 Framework approved by CATII
2012 April: Framework adopted by the City Council
2013 April — Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager, put in charge
of the Grandview development process.
2013 June: Cat III was appointed. July: CATIII begins meetings
Page 3 4/7/15
2014 January: Grandview Resident Survey completed
2014 Six out of 8 CAT members stated support for partnering with an
independent consultant to work with the community on defining the community
building. Two out of 8 supported partnering with a developer as proposed by
staff.
2014 May 20: City council votes to move forward with private developer RFI
2014 June: City releases RFI
2014 September: City chooses Frauenshuh as partner in a private /public
development
2014 Community Needs Assessment Survey completed
2014 December 4: City holds first general public meeting. Overwhelming response
in support for community /civic center
•
2015 January/February: City gathers public feedback under the private /public
scenario. A 100% public development is not an option. •
•
Page 4 4/7/15
0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2008
The City's Comprehensive Plan, Parks and Open Space chapter clearly state that it is City
policy to study the feasibility of acquiring more land for parks and recreation purposes when
such land becomes available and that the City should not sell any park land or open space.
Questions:
❑ Why wasn't / isn't the Park board involved in this process of determining the outcome
of public land?
❑ Why were the results of the 2006 park survey not taken into account in the early years
of discussion about Grandview?
❑ Why wasn't a hold put on the land while the Park Board determined the feasibility of
constructing and indoor recreational facility?
❑ Why wasn't the Comprehensive Plan followed?
•
From Page 9 -19 of the Comprehensive Plan:
•
Policies
1. Do not sell any park and/or open space property currently owned by the City of
Edina. An exception to this policy might include a property exchange for land of
equal or greater value that Is determined to be In the best interest of the
community.
2. Study the feasibility of acquiring additional park and open space properly within
the City limits as it may come available for public ownership.
3. Study the feasibility of acquiring or leasing additional properly outside the City
limits not greater than a five mile radius of the City limits for athletic field
purposes.
From Page 9 -24 of the Comprehensive Plan:
Residents were also asked to identify their top three choices that they are most willing
to fund with additional tax dollars; and the results were:
66% develop walking and biking trails
42% develop a new indoor recreation center
Page 5 4/7/15
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -continued
Page 9 -35 of the Comprehensive Plan:
•
The results of the 2006 Needs Assessment Survey show that 75 percent of respondents
are either very supportive (44 percent) or somewhat supportive (31 percent) of
developing a new indoor recreation center in Edina. Results showed that a new indoor
recreation center was the second most important new facility of respondents' choice.
Resources:
2008 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 9: Pages 9 -19, 9 -24, 9 -35,
http: / /bit.ly /1 zVl BsN
Found on City Website http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=comprehensive-plan
•
Page 6 4/7/15
•
•
•
THE SMALL AREA PLAN PROCESS 2010
The Small Area Plan Process was devised in Spring of 2010 and formally approved in
November of 2010. This resulted in a Community Advisory Team (CAT) referred to as CAT I
The Small Area Plan Process was not a Small Area Plan. Rather, it created the Seven Guiding
Principles that should be used when developing a Small Area Plan — see Recommendation 2,
below. A Small Area Plan was never developed.
EXCERPT FROM THE PROCESS DOCUMENT
Page 28 of the Small Area Plan Process:
RECOMMENDATION /CONCLUSION
As it submits this Report, the CAT recommends that:
1. The City Council accept and approve the Report.
2. The City Council adopt the Guiding Principles In this Report as the foundation for
development of a small area plan for the Grandview District
3. The process of developing a small area plan for the Grandview District be led by a
community-based advisory team that includes members of the current CAT and Design
Team, chosen through an open process similar to that used to form the initial
Community Advisory Team.
4. The City retain ownership of all city -owned public property in the Grandview District at
least while the planning process continues and potentially beyond depending upon the
results of the small area planning process.
Page 7 4/7/15
PUBLIC
GRANDVIEW
COMMENTS
As part of the
Livable
Communities
Demonstration
Account (LCDA)
grant, a Small Area
Plan was supposed
to be developed,
with items listed in
the next excerpt to
be completed.
THE SMALL AREA PLAN PROCESS — continued
EXCERPT FROM THE PROCESS DOCUMENT
Page 27 of the Small Area Plan Process:
IMPLEMENTATION
After the CAT made presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council, the City Council
expressed interest in receiving a formal report. Before this Report could be completed and
approved, the CAT learned about the potential for funding for a future implementation phase
of the process. Since the deadline for the grant funding was to expire before this formal Report
could be completed and approved by the Council, the City Council authorized staff to apply for
a Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant in July. The grant would defray
costs associated with the development of a Small Area Plan which would include the following
items:
• Market Analysis
• Community Needs Analysis
• Transportation Analysis and Plan
• Redevelopment Phasing Plan
• Public Participation Plan
• Financial Analysis of Redevelopment Plan
If awarded, the grant would likely cover all costs associated with the development of the Small
Area Plan, outside of in -kind staff time needed for the process.
Resources
http: / /bit,ly /GrandviewG uideProcess
Page 8 4/7/15
PUBLIC
GRANDVIEW
COMMENTS
No Small Area
Plan was ever
developed; the
document called
the Framework has
been used as a
plan. It could not
be called a Small
Area Plan because
most of the action
items listed to the
left were not
completed at the
time and have not
been completed
to date.
•
•
•
0
0
C
THE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT
FRAMEWORK
http:/ /bit.ly /1 oMYNpm
Over $100,000 was spent on this process. The Framework does not apply only to the former
Public Works site, but to the whole Grandview district.
Questions:
❑ Officials consistently call upon the Framework when the public asks for a community
center on the former public works site. They assert that the public wants a private /
public development on the public works site. Citizen input from 2006 to the present
defies that assumption.
C1 Why have most of the Framework implementation steps for less than a year and years
1 -5 not been completed, including discussion of a community/ civic building?
❑ In the discussion leading up to the council adopting the Framework, the council
directed the Park Board to work on defining the community building, the Edina
Transportation Committee to work on the transportation elements, and the Planning
Commission to work on zoning code changes. None of this happened. A Small Area
Plan was never completed.
EXCERPTS FROM THE FRAMEWORK
Implementation - Major Recommendations: Page 51
Immediate < 1 year
1 Development Framework approval
2 Policy for implementation/finance
3 Create Implementation Committee
4. Implementation Committee should address programming of
community/ civic building
5 Cream sustainability guide from GrcenStep
G TIF District
7A Design Guidelines
7 Form -based code for mixed use center
8 Green building standards required for district
9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan
10 Address Lifccyclle and affordable housing
Page 9 4/7/15
PUBLIC GRANDVIEW COMMENTS
#1 has been completed.
No other items on this list
have been completed.
In addition, items 11 -30 for
years 1 -5 have not been
completed. See document
page 51 for that list:
http: / /bit.ly /1 oMYNpm
THE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK - continued
EXCERPTS FROM THE FRAMEWORK
Page 15 of the Framework:
1 -5 Years
Land Use
11 Bus Garage site redevelopment
12 Townhouse units on public works site
13 Residential on Warner sitc/OLG
14 Community / Civic building
Page 49:
2. Establish an Implementation Steering
Committee using citizen volunteers to guide
the effort, including providing direction for
key remaining areas of the framework, with
working groups as needed to support the work
of the Implementation Steering Committee.
An over - riding objective of the GrandView
District planning process is to utilize local citizens
as experts in defining directions for an area
identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a location
where the potential for change exists. With
significant investment of time, talent, and energy,
in addition to the local knowledge that has been
developed through the Small Area Guide process
and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that
the process of planning using local citizens to
guide the process should continue. The process to
be pursued should, as in past efforts leading to the
framework, be defined by the citizen volunteers.
PUBLIC GRANDVIEW COMMENTS
Page 10
A 1-7 /1 G
#12. Public opinion has
weighed in against housing on
the public works site.
# 14. Community / Civic
Building - never studied.
An overriding (sic) objective—is to
utilize local citizens as experts in
defining directions....
Process of using local citizens to
guide the process should continue.
Process should be defined by citizen
volunteers.
No public realm development was ever
studied. The majority of the general
public was not aware of this process
until late 2014, prior to the December
4 meeting.
C]
.7
•
•
u
THE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK - continued
EXCERPTS FROM THE FRAMEWORK
Page 26 - Public Realm:
Acknowledge "no net loss," yet aggressively seek
new public space.
Improve the bike and pedestrian environment:
make it safe and friendly, and include adequate
parking area for bikes.
Create a community /dvic building connected
to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green
space) that connects east and west and serves as
an indoor/outdoor gathering space.
Create a prominent public realm of connected
parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open
space — a legible green framework as the primary
form giver.
Provide views within the District and maintain
important viewsheds (such as the "grand view'J
for public use.
Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian
environment that links public and private
destinations north -south (neighborhoods, library,
businesses) and east -west (neighborhoods,
businesses, commons, City Hall).
Page 28:
Grandview Commons
For GrandView, the public works site provides a
unique and singular opportunity to create a major
new public realm amenity that will add interest to
the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate,
and provide a signature gathering place in the
heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater
opportunity exists then to continuously link the
businesses and destinations within the District to
the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in
general
'This can begin immediately by simply investing
in a safe and connected public sidewalk network,
increment by increment.1he larger vision of the
public realm includes a community/civic building
and Grandview Green, a connected network of
public parks, public and private plazas, a new street
(GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape
improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities.
Ibis should include bridge enhancements on Eden
over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge
connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the
potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local
a bike path within the Canada Pacific Rail ROW.
Page 11
A 17/1 C
PUBLIC GRANDVIEW COMMENTS
Acknowledge "no net loss, "yet
aggressively seek new public space.
Unless the land remains 100% in the
public realm, we will LOSE public
space.
Create a community /civic building
With the number of requirements and
requests with respect to public space,
the Public Works site is not large
enough to house private development.
..the public works site provides a unique
and singular opportunity to create a
major new public realm amenity .... and
provide a signature gathering place in
the heart of the district.
The larger vision of the public realm
includes a community /civic building ...
The City has statistics from surveys,
meetings and social media that describes
what the community wants - a multi-
purpose community center that is an
indoor and gathering space, on public
land.
THE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK — continued
EXCERPTS FROM THE FRAMEWORK
Page 29:
Banquet and Reception
History/ Interpretive
Meetings;
PUBLIC GRANDVIEW COMMENTS
Page 12
n/7/9C
As of February 27, 2015, the City updated its
website to read:
Based on the suggestions and comments
collected to date, there appears to be shared
interest in four types of community facilities on
a portion of the site:
❑ New Community Recreation Center
❑ New Community Arts & Culture Center
❑ New Community Performing Arts Center
❑ New Multi- Purpose Community Center
(welcoming to all ages with indoor and
outdoor space)
A multi - purpose community center fits all of the
types of community facilities and the Framework
diagram to the left is consistent with a multi-
purpose community center.
In addition, public opinion supports that the
public works site stays publicly owned.
http: / /edinamn.govfindex.phhp ?section = Manning Grandview
Update
Cj
•
•
C]
•
December 2013 - Grandview Community Advisory Team
http: / /bit.ly /1 KeWEmm
EXCERPTS FROM PAGES 2 & 3 of Meeting Minutes from October 2013 Meeting:
d. Making "Great Places" — Bill Neuendorf introduced the Great Places Initiative and
summarized characteristics of a "great place ". He suggested that these items be
considered as the Team re- imagines the use of this vacant property. The Team also
reviewed and discussed "Eleven Principles for Creating Great Community Places ".
Question: What happened to this effort?
Website reference: http: / /www.pi2s.org /reference /l1steps/
The Team discussed the lack of communication support for this project and discussed
how to generate more community interest /involvement while having no budget for
communications. Articles in the Sun Current, About Town and the internet may be
helpful to raise awareness of the effort to redevelop the vacant site. It was also
suggested that the Team meetings be broadly publicized. It was also suggested that a
large sign be placed on the vacant site to ask passersby "what's your vision ?"
Improvements to th^ r :,.T VVC0.3ct„ ...,,.V. UISO_�..gg.,�F,,.a
�c �..�� �rcai�i�c r�ci c a�ov .74 cOLGM.
Comment: The above points to the fact that very few Edina residents knew about the
Grandview process, even though it has been stated that there was "extensive public
engagement." The sign wasn't placed on the public works lot until AFTER the RFI
process was initiated.
f. Defining Mixed -Use — Mr. Neuendorf also presented the principles of "mixed use
development" and distributed several examples to illustrate the variety of ways in which
a mixed -use project can be implemented. It was noted that true mixed -use districts are
created over time. In Grandview, for example the vacant Public Works site might be the
first phase; with other sites to follow over time.
Comment: Mixed use is brought up here. The City hadn't performed any feasibility of a
community center option, as was outlined in the Framework.
Page 13
A /7 /1 C
C
•
MINUTES
CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION
EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM
Thursday February 12, 2015
7:05 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05p.m.
II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Anderson, Glahn, Gubrud, Howard, Kostuch, Latham, Padmanabhan,
Sierks, Thompson, Waddick, and Chair Heer
Absent: Zarrin
Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. Member Latham requested Urban Forest Task Force Report to be added
to the Agenda.
Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the amended Meeting
Agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA
• A. Minutes. Member Anderson requested a spelling change on item VIII.I. "DECCA" should be changed
to "DECA ".
B. Attendance report and roster. Member Howard noticed Member Zarrin was marked as attending
the January meeting, but she was absent.
C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Sierks requested Tim Rudnicki to be removed from the
Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Member Waddick requested Laurie Bruno and Michelle
Jordan to be removed from the Water Quality Working Group.
Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the remaining Consent
Agenda. Motion carried unanimously.
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No comment.
VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Chicken Ordinance. Member Latham reported that on the day of the January 20, 2015 City Council
meeting, Council received an e-mail from Edina resident, Ross Plaetzer of 4058 Sunnyside Road.
Because the Local Food Working Group (LFWG) and the Edina Energy and Environment Commission
(EEC) had no opportunity to review the e -mail prior to the Council meeting, Council declined to
approve the EEC's proposed fowl amendments at the January 20, 2015 first reading and directed EEC
to review the facts in the e -mail and make recommendations on the requests in the e -mail prior to
Council's second reading of the fowl amendments, which is scheduled for March 17, 2015.
Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Gubrud to adopt the report as written. Motion
carried unanimously.
•
•
A. Bees. Member Latham said Scott Neal pulled the report, because he didn't have time to read it and
talk to the staff that'll be involved with the new ordinance. The only issue is that of whether a
neighbor within 200 feet of an apiary lot line can compel an apiary registration revocation by
showing a documented past anaphylaxis due to a bee sting, without documenting what kind of bee,
or whether the City Council will adopt a higher standard, as recommended by the Energy and
Environment Commission, showing a documented past anaphylaxis specifically due to a honeybee
(Apismellifera) sting. Both alternatives are presented in the proposed policy for Council to consider.
The Council's second reading is scheduled for March 17, 2015.
Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Glahn to adopt the policy with the alternative
of specific to honey bee stings as we initially proposed, but we are including the other alternative of bees
generally in case that is Council's pleasure. Motion carried unanimously.
B. Community Solar Update. Member Sierks said the application of assistance was approved for
Community Solar. Subcommittee may recommend an RFP will be written once the committee knows
what the different issues are insurance, liability, rates, etc. are needed. There's two ways to do solar
development as a public entity. First, Met Council is looking at having as big as project as they can
with as few members as they can, so they can get the highest potential return or lowest cost to pay
for solar. A project needs to have at least five partners. Second, Minneapolis has a lot of community
interest, so they want to make solar available to residents, so the more people the higher the cost
will be. Is our intent to make it available for the community, or are we maximizing City's return on •
investment.
Chair Heer excused himself from the meeting at 7:41pm.
Mr. Bintner said all of the action will be with big companies. He suggested reviewing Hennepin
County and Met Council's RFP work with private developers, and that trying to take on a developer
role directly would be a big risk. If the city were to purchase credits, you cannot claim carbon
reduction, but if you choose to Buy Renewal Energy Credits, there would no longer be a savings;
instead you would pay more for energy, similar to Windsource.
C. Grandview Advisory. Acting Chair Kostuch reviewed two different Advisories to Council referencing
adding environmental principals to the Grandview planning development.
Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Thompson to move the Grandview Advisory
listing examples of environmental actions. Motion carried. Member Glahn opposed.
Acting Chair Kostuch would like Mr. Bintner to follow up on past Advisory's to Council to see if action
has been taken on them.
D. March 12 Televised Meeting Prep. Acting Chair Kostuch asked Members what topics should be
reviewed during the March televised meeting. He requested all Members to create a summary of
their topic to be prepared. The following Members are responsible for the Working Group or
Subcommittee Reports.
Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee - Sierks
Business Recycling Working Group - Zarrin •
City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee - Kostuch
I
0
• Community Solar Subcommittee - Sierks
• Education Outreach Working Group - Thompson
• Home Energy Squad Subcommittee - Gubrud
• Local Food Working Group - Latham
• Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group - Zarrin
• Student Subcommittee — Anderson & Padmanabhan
• Urban Forest Task Force Report - Latham
• Water Quality Working Group - Waddick
Mr. Bintner has extended an invite to Rick Carter for a Regional Indicators Initiative update. Karen
Kurt will present on Vision Edina. Center for Energy and Environment will discuss Home Energy
Squad. Mr. Bintner will present Building Energy Annual Summary. Kostuch will give an overview of
the Purchasing Report. Member Latham will present as a resident on the Urban Forest Task Force
Report and Local Food Working Group. Talk briefly on 2015 Work Plan. Ask residents to join working
groups. Elections of Chair and Vice Chair for 2015/16 will occur. It'll be the first meeting for the
three new members.
E. April 7 EEC /CC Joint Workshop Prep. Acting Chair Kostuch reviewed slides that'll be presented at the
meeting. The meeting is to ask Council how Edina is going to reach their Chapter 10 goals in the
Comp Plan. The goal should remind Council what they signed on for and how can EEC help you. Per
Council's request, EEC has prioritized from their Work Plan the following in order of importance.
1. City Building Energy Efficiency initiative
• a. EEC Commissioners to work with City Manager and City Building manager to
create a detailed plan for retrofitting existing buildings within 5 years
b. At least one building will be retrofitted in 2015 either under the City's own effort
or under the State GESP program
2. Expand City subsidized Home Energy Squad (HES) installs for residents
a. The City will fund 150 HES installs at a cost of $10,500; prioritize for lower income
(a dramatic increase over the current funding of $4000)
b. EEC will educate and promote HES with the goal to get 500 visits in the year.
3. Measurement — continue to use and refine metrics and analyses
a. B3 database for all City Buildings
b. Create metrics for City vehicle fleets (gallons of fuel)
c. Create metrics for Utility operations (energy usage)
d. Regional Indicators for City as a whole
4. City Capital Process Environmental Considerations Initiative
a. EEC to review results of having an environmental considerations section in 2014
CIP process. EEC commissioners will work with City staff to refine and expand so that
all capital decisions (i.e., new buildings, major building renovations and fleet
purchases) have explicitly environmental analysis on how they will affect City GHG
VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Report.
VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. No Report.
B. Business Recycling Working Group. No Report.
C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No Report.
• D. Community Solar Subcommittee. No Report.
E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Howard announced the continuation of their
occasional film series with "Cowspiracy" on the 3 `d Friday of April. Member Thompson gave an
P
17-�
update on the April 8th forum. The topic will be "Here Comes the Sun" which is about Community
Solar. The guest speakers will be from Lisa from CERTS and Paul Douglas.
Chair Heer arrived at 8:57p.m.
The Member's reviewed the forum's press release. There is concern about not enough time is being
spent on the solar topic like originally planned. There will be a resource fair before the guest speakers.
F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud said 390installs have occurred since 2010.
There has been 18 installs since November. There are nine scheduled and there are five low income
candidates. The year the City did subsidies was the biggest installs.
G. Local Food Working Group. No Report.
H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. Member Latham reviewed the revised Collection of
Compost ordinance. The change was to eliminate the option of co- collecting organics with recycling.
The organics will be stored in a separate bag that'd be put into recycling, but worried about the bag
breaking and contaminating the recycling. This new ordinance will need to be reviewed in a Council
work session.
Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Sierks to accept the change. Motion carried.
Member Glahn opposed.
Urban Forest Task Force Report. Member Latham gave an update on the Park Board meeting. They
adopted the Emerald Ash Bore proposal. They also adopted the change to the ordinance on •
boulevard trees. The section 36 changes were forwarded to the Planning Commission. The Living
Streets initiative was forwarded to the Transportation Commission. The Green Steps Cities best
practices were tabled to their working group on urban forest task force. The recommendation to
adopt Minneapolis's park board do not plant list was tabled to their work group. Certifying selected
city parks as autobahn cooperative sanctuary was tabled to their strategic plan. Buckthorn
maintenance will follow up with a maintenance plan was tabled to their strategic plan. The garden
council will help cleanup buckthorn in Bredesen Park. The tree preservation ordinance was passed
by council.
I. Student Subcommittee. Member Anderson said he talked to the solar panel engineer and said
designs are changing. The students are still doing fundraising too. Member Thompson said a group
was getting started at Valley View Middle School.
J. Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick gave an update on the outreach to Arden Park
houses along creek to install buffers. Her working group will talk about Storm Drain Issues at the
April forum. The group has discussed salt usage outreach to 25 businesses. They have been passing
out two flyers, Residential Snow and Ice Care and Winter Maintenance Hiring Someone. Storm
drain stenciling will start again in Spring. The meeting will change to the second Tuesday of the
month.
K. 2015 EEC Schedule and Workplan. March meeting televised.
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
A. EEC Member Updates. Mr. Bintner thanked Member Latham and Chair Heer for their services due to
their terms ending. The EEC Members were very appreciative of their work. •
B. Project Updates. No Report.
9
There was a discussion on who's willing to be Chair and Vice Chair for 2015. The three new EEC Members will be
announced on February 17th. The Council will be assigning an alternate member too.
There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 9:42p.m.
Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried
unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Rebecca Foster
GIS Administrator
•
Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet.
Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)
Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE)
Regular Meeting w /Quorum
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
ENERGY
Regular Meeting w/o Quorum
&ENVIRONMENT
Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Joint Work Session
COMMISSION
Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member.
Rescheduled Meeting'
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
J
F
I M
I A
M
J
J
A
S
O N
D
Work Session
Work Session
# of Mtgs.
Attendance %
Meetings/Work Sessions
1
1
1
3
NAME
TERM
41712015
(Enter Date)
Glahn, William
2/1/2017
1
1
1
3
100%
Gubrud, Bob
2/1/2016
1
1
2
67%
Howard, John
2/1/2016
1
1
1
3
100%
Kostuch, Keith
2/1/2016
1
1
1
3
100%
Manser, Richard
3/1/2018
1
1
100%
Satterkee, Lauren
3/1/2018
1
1
100%
Seeley, Melissa
3/1/2018
1
1
100%
Sierks, Bill
2/1/2016
1
1
1
3
100%
Thompson, Paul
2/1/2016
1
1
1
3
100%
Waddick, Louise
2/1/2017
1
1
1
3
100%
Zarrin, Sarah
3/1/2018
1
1
33%
Heer, John
2/1/2015
1
1
2
100 %.
Latham, Dianne Plunkett
2/1/2015
1
1
2
100%
0
0%
Anderson, Reilly
9/1/2015
1
1
1
3
100%
Padmanabhan, Sunaya
9/1/2015
1
1
1
3
1.00%
Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet.
Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE)
Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE)
Regular Meeting w /Quorum
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
Type 1 " under the month for each attending member.
Regular Meeting w/o Quorum
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Joint Work Session
Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line.
Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member.
Rescheduled Meeting'
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Cancelled Meeting
Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line.
Type "1" under the month for ALL members.
Special Meeting
There is no number typed on the meetings' line.
There is no number typed on the members' lines.
'A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is
0 0 0 , ,
MINUTES
• OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 27, 2015
7:30 AM
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Olson called the meeting to order at 7:30 am
11. ROLLCALL
Answering roll call were Members Benson, Christiaansen, Crain, Elliott (arrived at 7:35 p.m.), Kojetin,
Olson, and Schwartz.
Members Absent: Members Cardarelle, Currie, and Reed.
Staff in attendance: Kristin Aarsvold, Edina Park and Recreation Department Supervisor.
Others in attendance: Dick Crockett.
111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
The agenda was approved as presented.
IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of the January 30, 2015 Veterans Memorial Committee Meeting Minutes.
Motion by Member Schwartz and seconded by Member Kojetin to approve the meeting
minutes from the January 30, 2015 meeting as presented.
Ayes: Benson, Christiaansen, Crain, Kojetin, Olson, and Schwartz. Motion carried.
V. UPDATE ON CONSTRUCTION
Member Elliott arrived.
Member Elliott distributed packets of information for the Committee to review, which includes the
latest rendition of the memorials. He noted that this version also includes the suggestions
incorporated by Member Currie. He asked the Members to review the designs and provide any input
prior to finalization.
Member Benson referenced Colin Powell, who is named for a quote, and suggested that General be
listed prior to the name.
Member Schwartz stated that there is a protocol for listing branches of military and suggested that the
order be checked in order to place the names in the correct position.
Member Benson confirmed that he would follow up with an individual at Fort Snelling to gather
additional input.
• Member Elliott displayed an example of the granite with engraving that will be used. He made the
suggestion of blasting the medallion into the granite and making the eagle stand out with bronze. He
stated that the other option would be to recess the bronze medallion into the granite.
Member Schwartz questioned if there is a cost difference.
Member Elliott replied that the bronze medallion option would be slightly more costly but stated that •
should not be the deciding factor because the budget does include funds for that option, as that was
the original direction from the Committee.
Member Schwartz stated that he prefers the blasted in option, which would provide consistency.
Member Benson stated that he also prefers the blasted in option.
Member Crain stated that the Design Committee discussed this in depth and explained that the eagle
will be done in bronze and therefore the bronze medallions will help to tie that in.
Chairman Olson stated that the process is already so far along and believed that changes should not be
made at this point, especially with Members not in attendance.
VI. UPDATE ON DONOR RECOGNITION
Member Elliott stated that a list was provided to double check that everyone that should be included is
included and noted that spelling can also be checked as well.
Chairman Olson stated that he has a list of donors that he will call to verify correct spelling.
Mr. Crockett advised of a correction that should be made to reflect funds received from the
Community Foundation. He also suggested that names be listed alphabetically.
Member Elliott stated that the Design Committee recommended that the personal donors be listed
above the government agencies. He provided a cost estimate of $3,000 from Murphy Granite for the
donor plaques and noted that he will receive another bid for the item from another company. He also
asked for input on the inclusion of logos from the City of Edina, State of Minnesota, and Legacy Fund.
Mrs. Aarsvold stated that the Sign Committee met and stated that the kiosk could include how the
memorial came to be and could include logos and recognition in another manner. She stated that
perhaps the logos be left to the interpretive signage rather than on the memorial or plaques.
Member Crain stated that although this was a grass roots project involving local donations, the
memorial would not have moved forward without the donations from the government entities. He did
not think it would be inappropriate but agreed that perhaps the logos should not be included on the
plaques.
It was the consensus of the Committee to not include the logos.
Member Christiaansen stated that perhaps someone should reach out to the Rotary to ensure that
they will be in agreement with not including their logo.
Mr. Crockett stated that logos will be listed on the Foundation website.
Member Schwartz stated that perhaps the donation list should be verified to ensure that other donors
were not missed.
Motion by Member Benson and seconded by Member Crain to approve the design of the
recognition plaques without logos, with the exception of the Rotary which will be verified.
Ayes: Benson, Christiaansen, Crain, Elliott, Kojetin, Olson, and Schwartz. Motion carried.
• Member Christiaansen continued to review the recognition proposal including in -kind donations.
Chairman Olson confirmed that he would follow up with a business and previous Committee member
to determine if their names should be included.
Member Christiaansen continued to review the categories of recognition.
Mrs. Aarsvold stated that she would confirm the members of City Council that should be included for
recognition.
Member Kojetin suggested listing the City officials but not including their titles.
Chairman Olson suggested including the date of dedication on the plaque and it was discussed that
more detailed information can be included on the kiosk.
VII. CELEBRATION UPDATE
Chairman Olson confirmed that he will continue to work with City staff. He provided an update on
contacts that he has made and confirmations that he has received.
Mrs. Aarsvold stated that she and Mr. Schulstad reached out to an Eagle Scout that is going to
coordinate with other Troops to provide assistance for the event. She noted that parking will be
allowed along one side of 50th. She also provided a brief summary of items that were discussed by the
Sign Committee for inclusion on the kiosk.
Vlll. ADJOURNMENT
• Meeting adjourned at 8:40 a.m.
0
MINUTES OF
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
COMMUNITY ROOM
FEBRUARY 19, 2015
6:00 P.M.
ROLL CALL Answering roll call was members Bass, Boettge, lyer, Janovy, Nelson, Olson, and Spanhake.
ABSENT Campbell, La Force, Rummel
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Motion was made by member Spanhake and seconded by member Boettge to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye.
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF January 15, 2015
Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Olson to approve the minutes of Jan. 15, 2015. All voted
aye. Motion carried.
COMMUNITY COMMENT - None.
REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS
Wooddale /Valley View Small Area Plan
Ms. Arlene Forrest, member of the Planning Commission (PC) and co -chair of the Wooddale /Valley Small Area Plan, and Ms.
40 indy Crawford, City Manager Intern, presented the small area plan.
Ms. Forrest explained that the Wooddale /Valley View area was identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan as an area to be
redeveloped and the PC added it to their 2015 work plan. Ms. Forrest said small area planning is new for the City and since
there are a couple other areas where this process can be used, they are working to develop a process that could be applied
citywide. For the Wooddale /Valley View area, Ms. Forrest said they began the planning process June, 2014 -- identified the
planning team, a consultant to work with them, held three community engagement meetings for area residents, developed a
draft plan which will go to PC for review and approval and then to the City Council in March for review and final approval.
As it relates to transportation for the 11 acre site, Ms. Forrest said their organizing principles or land use planning goals are
for parking to be attached garages or underground, buildings to be located near streets /sidewalks without intervening
parking, trees between curb and sidewalk, attractive landscaping, circulating connections such as walking, biking and transit
should be comfortable, and well linked to nearby neighborhoods.
Ms. Crawford asked for feedback on the transportation and street design map. Member Nelson recalled discussions about
shifting the intersections at Oaklawn, W. 62nd and Valley View. Ms. Forrest said she learned that W. 62nd is a state aid road
and this impact what can be done, including a roundabout which would be prohibitive because of the required size to meet
state aid standards. Feedback from residents included cut thru traffic, running stop signs, difficulty crossing Wooddale during
busy times and a lack of sidewalk on Wooddale south of Valley View. Member Nelson said one option shown was to close
Oaklawn. He said the intersections were modified a few years back but it still does not function well and there are always
complaint about cut thru traffic and requests for stop signs. If the decision is made to close off intersections, chair Bass asked
that they at least maintain pedestrian access. Member Janovy asked about traffic counts on W. 62nd but this street is outside
of their study area.
hair Bass asked if the proposed sidewalk was on the Sidewalk Facility Map and Ms. Forrest said no, it was an addition. Chair
Bass said it was gratifying and encouraging seeing that when you start with residents' vision for their neighborhood and how
it functions they want sidewalk and you don't have to convince them. She commended the team for including transit. She
ked about residents' participation and Ms. Forrest said there were approximately 80 at the first meeting probably due in
art to a rumor that low income housing would be built. Participation at subsequent meetings was approximately 15. In
addition to the meetings, they conducted a survey but participation was low. She said they will evaluate the process when it
is completed.
Respect is a Two Way Street Campaign
Planner Nolan said staff would like to start the campaign next month. He said the ETC's feedback was taken into
consideration but because of costs, time constraints and balancing the needs of all departments, with the exception of
adding pedestrian considerations the document was not changed much.
The general feedback from the ETC was disappointment that more changes were not made to the campaign document.
Specific concerns raised or suggestions are as follows:
• Not accessible to children;
• Can SHIP and Crime Prevention funds be used? Yes;
• Suggested sidewalk art to engage people; U of M as an example where they used stickers that lasted awhile but was
not permanent;
• Funding seems to be going to materials that will be thrown away;
• First draft seemed preachy and nothing much has changed;
• Audience cannot be children and adults at the same time (Planner Nolan said the audience is everyone and campaign
posters can be personalized based on placement);
• Who are the messengers for the campaign?
• What issues are they trying to solve with the campaign? (Active Routes to School requires a campaign and the police
• receives many calls on this issue and would like to address it);
• Quarterly message may have more impact instead of switching monthly;
• Example of U of M where they presented the same message in different ways for one to two years to make it stick;
• Small handouts will not have an impact;
• Need bigger budget;
• Create transportation walk at Promenade similar to U of M's Nobel Peace Prize walk;
• Lacks collaboration; 95% cut and paste from other sources; Edina deserves something custom made that favors its
audience;
• Not getting money's worth if used on video and social media;
• Have children create the messages;
• MNDOT has a curriculum around walking and biking that may be more suited for children;
• Strategize to get the school district involved;
• Can Living Streets champions also champion the campaign?
In conclusion, chair Bass said while the campaign could be more collaboratively, they should work to make it as effective as
possible. She suggested connecting with other campaigns to see what would meet the goals for their community.
Edina Challenge: Transportation Options Subcommittee Discussion
Chair Bass said in December, members of the Edina Challenge steering committee came to the ETC and asked for assistance
with one of their challenges — transportation for underserved youths. The ETC formed a subcommittee that included chair
Bass, members Spanhake, Nelson, Rummel and Campbell to look into the matter. She said they met once and a summary of
their meeting is detailed in her report to the ETC. The subcommittee's recommendation is a follows:
0 Establish a "Getting around the city working group with a narrow purpose:
2
Articulate the full scope of the problem, through additional research and community conversation (we
• felt the scope would feed the circulator work that is currently on our 2015 work plan) and make a
recommendation to the ETC— and subsequently Council — based on these findings. The recommendation
is likely to include a request for staff and /or budget support in identifying solutions based on the findings.
Be clear about the city's boundaries (what is and isn't within our control).
Chair Bass said a lack of transportation is a common issue heard around the city, not just for youths; however, based on their
work plan, the issue is too much for them to take on alone. She said the first transportation option working group's area was
too narrowly focused - -it specifically looked at transportation options for seniors and received a $10,000 grant toward the
purchase of a bus but the company the grant was aligned with went out of business and the working group was disbanded.
The following were discussed:
• Chairing working groups can be overwhelming if only the ETC member can be the chair;
• Some transportation options are available but they are not centralized;
• Maybe the City's role should be providing support instead of finding solutions;
• Is the City planning on looking at this as a global issue? It is not in the Transportation Plan and the Council has not
directed staff to look into this.
• Include survey with utility bills to get feedback.
• Has Council directed staff to look into the Circulator? No.
Chair Bass asked for a volunteer to serve as the liaison with her serving as their support and member Nelson volunteered.
W otion was made by member Spanhake and seconded by member Iyer to have a member of the ETC serve as a liaison on
e Edina Challenge steering committee.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Traffic Safety Committee Report of February 4, 2015
Al. For clarification, member Janovy said she was the requestor and her request was to get the meaning of "when children
are present" and for enforcement because she heard complaints from residents in the area. She believes this is a denial
because she has not been told the meaning of "when children are present." She suggested moving it to section B and revise
for clarity.
A3. Member Janovy said she is not in disagreement with this but recalled when the same issue was raised a few years ago,
she was given a different answer. Planner Nolan said the police said drivers are not allowed to park but they would prefer to
handle it through the school instead of by citations and they have already reached out to the principal.
A4. Member Janovy said she was not comfortable approving this so far in advance of the study because they don't know
what the solution might be. Chair Bass said this would be an immediate safety improvement to a small area that would not
be expensive to improve now or in the future.
61. Member Janovy said a different standard is used on B1 than in A2. She said 'delay' is a better measure than 'gap.'
Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Olson to forward the revised Feb. 4, 2015, report to the
City Council.
voted aye.
otion carried.
3
Updates
• Student Members — None.
Bike Edina Working Group
Member Janovy reported that they have a new co- chair, Lori Richman. Open Streets planning is underway.
Living Streets Working Group
Member Nelson said the Living Streets community engagement meetings took place recently and they were well attended.
Planner Nolan said at the first meeting one resident was concerned with lack of public input, and at the second meeting
several were concerned with taking away parking and Maddox Lane residents continued to speak out against sidewalks. In
general, residents were happy with the plan. The updated draft will be presented to the ETC on Mar. 19, to the Planning
Commission on Mar. 25, and to the City Council in April.
Walk Edina Working Group
Member Boettge said the working group's assignment was to attend one of the Living Streets meetings and feedback was
that they learned a lot.
Motion was made by member Boettge and seconded by member Janovy to approve member Joel Stegner to the Walk
Edina Working Group.
All voted aye.
Motion carried.
Communications Committee — None.
CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
correspondence was received from the Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) titled "Excerpt of EEC's Urban Forest Task
Force Report Relevant to Living Streets." It was noted that the City is working on a new tree ordinance and they need to make
sure this excerpt is in alignment with the new ordinance.
CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Member Janovy said she and members Laforce and lyer met with director Millner and Sharon about the reconstruction
survey and presented some ideas. Planner Nolan said staff plans to report back to the ETC in March.
Member lyer said he is surprised working groups cannot be chaired by anyone. He suggested changing this to just having a
commissioner as a member of the working group. Member Janovy said this is a boards and commission bylaw that would
impact all boards and commissions. Planner Nolan will check to see what can be done.
Member Olson said he came across the City's webpage that list PACS funded projects and this was nice to see.
In reference to the Living Streets plan to have parking on one side of streets, member Nelson said they need to be careful not
to litter the other side of the streets with no parking signs. Member Janovy said in City of Maplewood, she recalled they
weren't planning to sign the other side of the streets as no parking.
Chair Bass asked for an update on the offer to meet with the developer regarding transportation for the Grandview plan since
economic development Neuendorf presented last time and planner Nolan said he would check on this and report back next
month.
TAFF COMMENTS
response is expected next month on the Cornelia Drive Sidewalk grant that was submitted, and bids will be open soon for
the 2015 neighborhood street reconstruction projects.
4
rance Avenue lighting project was delayed due to contractor negligence and in lieu of a fine, the contractor will be installing
xtra lights.
Early stage planning is under way for a noise wall for the southbound exit ramp off TH -100 to Vernon Avenue. This has been
in the works for several years when it was petitioned for and then petitioned against. Residents would have been assessed
the full cost, but now it is in MNDOT's queue for 2017 and they would absorb most of the cost. Senator Franzen is planning
to submit a bill to fund this and other noise walls. A community engagement meeting is scheduled for Mar. 10.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned.
ATTENDANCE
TRANSPORTATION
COMMISSION
ATTENDANCE
J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
SM
SM
WS
# of
Mtgs
Attendance %
Meetings/Work
Sessions
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
12
NAME
Bass, Katherine
TERM
2/1/2017
1
1
(Enter
Date)
(Enter
Date)
(Enter
Date)
2
67%
Boett e, Emil
2/1/2017
1
1
2
67%
I er, Su rya
3/1/2018
1
1
2
67%
LaForce, Tom
3/1/2018
1
1
33%
Janov , Jennifer
2/1/2017
1
1
2
67%
Nelson, Paul
2/1/2016
1
1
2
67%
Olson, Larry
2/1/2016
1
1
33%
Whited, Courtney
2/1/2015
1
1
33%
Spanhake, Dawn
2/1/2016
1
1
2
67%
Rummel, Anna
9/1/2015
1
1
33%
Campbell, Jack
9/1/2015
0
0%
1
U
r�
LJ
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION
February 24, 2015 7:00 PM
City Hall — Community Room
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Seidman called the meeting to order at 7:00pm.
II. ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Commissioners Arseneault, Bigbee, Gates, Kennedy, Chair
Seidman, Weinert, and Winnick. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison MJ Lamon and City
Management Fellow Lindy Crawford.
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Motion was made by Arseneault to approve the Regular Meeting Agenda of February 24,
2015. The motion was seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried.
IV. APPROVAL OF January 27, 2015 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the minutes as presented to the HRRC.
Commissioner Arseneault seconded. Motion carried.
V. COMMUNITY COMMENT
. None.
VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Work Plan Initiative Updates
a) Community Outreach ( Bigbee, Davis)
Commissioner Bigbee shared that a meeting was held on February 17th but no one
was in attendance. The working group has cancelled the meeting scheduled for
February 25th. There are two meetings scheduled for March. Depending on the
turnout of those meetings, the working group may have to schedule more meetings
for April or later, and the project's target completion date might have to be changed
to later in 2015. The working group co- chair, Commissioner Davis, will update the
HRRC about next steps in following meetings.
b) Human Rights City Designation (Kennedy, Sanders)
Commissioner Kennedy has a working group meeting scheduled for March 16'h to
work through the general scope of the project. She has talked with stakeholders
about having presentations at City venues and public spaces in hopes to reach many
people in the community.
c) Days of Remembrance /Genocide Awareness (Seidman, Kennedy, Arseneault)
Chair Seidman, Kennedy, Arseneault, and former Commissioner Cashmore have
been working on this project. They completed a public service announcement which
will be released in March. They are working with Staff Liaison Lamon on the
schedule for the event and other details. The event will be held on Sunday, April
19th from 1:00- 3:30pm at City Hall. The working group has requested marketing
is pieces from the Edina Communications and Technology Services department to be
used for advertising.
0
d) Affordable Housing ( Winnick)
Commissioner Winnick shared that the City of Edina currently has two affordable
housing projects that are pending, 66 West and 7200 France. The 66 West lawsuit
has been dismissed. At this point, the plaintiffs in the case have been anonymous.
Winnick would like the HRRC to ask City staff if we can find out who the plaintiffs
are in the case. Motion was made by Winnick to ask Staff Liaison Lamon to inquire
with Scott Neal, City Manager whether it is possible to learn the identity of the
plaintiffs. Bigbee seconded. Motion carried.
Winnick shared that 7200 France may be back for consideration, so the HRRC
needs to stay informed about this potential project. Winnick has been in contact with
the developer, architect, and the City of Edina Planning department.
e) Body Image and Sexuality Awareness (Student Commissioner Gates, Seidman,
Arseneault)
Student Commissioner Gates would like to interview supportive parents and
grandparents of teens to discuss how they feel about the their children /
grandchildren's identifying with sexuality. Gates's goal is to put the interviews
online to help and teach other parents and hopefully change their view on body
image and sexuality awareness. Gates met with the Edina High School GSA club for
ideas and support. She has emailed various organizations and is hopeful to get
support from them as well.
f) Human Trafficking (Student Commissioner Weinert, Seidman, Arseneault) •
Student Commissioner Weinert advised that the Human Trafficking Committee has
met and set the date for an event on April 9t' from 6:30- 8:30pm at City Hall to raise
awareness about human trafficking. Weinert is working with Against Modern Day
Slavery Club at Edina High School as a co- sponsor; the event will involve both
students and adults. The plan is to ask Breaking Free for a speaker on sex trafficking
in Minnesota for the first part of the program, then there will be a panel discussion
afterwards. Weinert is in the process of contacting various organizations to identify
panelists for the program.
B. Revisit 2015 Meeting Schedule
Commissioner Arseneault shared that three new HRRC members will be starting in
March and we will want them to feel and be engaged in our work as soon as possible, so
it does not make sense to have them wait until May for the next meeting. Motion was
made by Winnick to reinstate the HRRC regular meeting on April 28, 2015. Kennedy
seconded. Motion carried.
C. Tom Oye Vote
There were seven nominees for the 2015 Tom Oye Award. Three of those nominees were
rolled over from the previous year. Commissioners each shared their top two nominees in
two rounds of comments. Motion was made by Arseneault to award the Tom Oye Award
to Jessi Kingston. Kennedy seconded. Motion carried.
Motion was made by Arseneault to have the HRRC provide funds to pay for one guest
selected by the Tom Oye Award recipient to the Volunteer Awards Reception. Winnick
seconded. Motion carried. •
The 2015 -2016 Tom Oye Committee will be charged with reviewing the award process
and making recommendations by the June meeting of the HRRC for guidelines, changes
and / or improvements on the following:
• How to honor all of the nominees
• Roll over
• Timeline (date applications are due)
• Criteria for award
• Individual vs group nominees
• HRRC members as nominators
• HRRC members (past or present) being nominated
D. Response to Community Correspondence
The HRRC discussed the response to community correspondence letter template in the
meeting packet. Following concerns about the length of the letter and the message it
conveys, Commissioner Winnick proposed revised language. The HRRC responded
positively to the revised language. There was consensus to utilize the letter template as
revised by Winnick as an appropriate response to community correspondence.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITION
The HRRC addressed correspondence received in the meeting packet. Kennedy noted that she
would sit on the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions if the HRRC decided to
become a member. Motion was made by Winnick that the HRRC become a member of the
League of Minnesota Human Rights Commission for 2015. Arseneault seconded. Bigbee
40 abstained. Motion carried.
Commissioner Bigbee advised that in researching the Day Without Violence correspondence,
he was not able to find a contact. At this time the HRRC will not take up this issue.
VIII. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS
Chair Seidman stated that the next HRRC meeting is March 24, 2015. The HRRC will have
three new members at that time. Seidman thanked Bigbee for six years of service to the
HRRC including his two years as chair, and she thanked the HRRC for her time serving as
Chair.
Commissioner Bigbee shared that the support from City Council, City staff, and other boards
and commissions has been honorable over the past six years. He shared a few things he has
learned during his time on the HRRC.
Kennedy has a meeting with legislators (Senator Pappas and Representative Allen) and the
Executive Director of the Indian Affairs Council tomorrow to discuss Indigenous People's
Day legislation to be proposed this legislative session. She is planning to recruit a law student
for the Human Rights City Designation working group.
Student Commissioners shared what they have gained through their service on the HRRC.
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
Staff Liaison Lamon shared that all new boards and commission members have orientation
tomorrow evening. The Volunteer Awards Reception is Wednesday, April 29 at 5:30pm. The
Boards and Commissions Annual Meeting is Monday, April 20, 2015 at 5:30pm.
X. 2015 ANNUAL ELECTION
Commissioner Winnick reported that the nominee for Chair is Commissioner Arseneault and
the nominee for Vice Chair is Commissioner Kennedy. Chair Seidman opened the floor for
nominations. Motion was made by Winnick that nominations be closed. Bigbee seconded.
Motion carried.
Winnick moved to approve the slate of nominations of Arseneault for Chair and Kennedy for
Vice Chair. Bigbee seconded. Motion carried.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Motion was made by Commissioner Arseneault to adjourn the February 24th meeting,
Winnick seconded. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:08pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Minutes approved by HRRC March 24, 2015
MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison
Pat Arseneault, HRRC Chair
0
•
•
0 0
•
HUMAN
RIGHTS
& RELATIONS COMMISSION
J
I F
I M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
Work Session
Work Session
# of Mtgs.
Attendance
Meetings/Work Sessions
NAME
Arseneault, Patrice
TERM
3/1/20181
1
1
1
1
1
1
::
(Enter Date)
(Enter Date)
3
100%
Davis, Laura
3/1/2018
1
1
2
67%
Kennedy, Ellen
2/1/2017
1
1
1
3
100%
Sanders, Tiffany
2/1/2017
1
1
2
67%
Seidman, Jan
2/1/2016
1
3
100%
Winnick, Steve
2/1/2016
2
67%
Tian, Tony
3/1/2018
1
1
33%
Vecchio - Smith, Maggie
3/1/2017
011
1
1
33%
Burza, Jasna
3/1/2016
1
1
33%
Bigbee, Arnie
2/1/2015
2
67%
Gates, Nicole
9/1/2015
1
1
2
67%
Weinert, Katrina
9/1/20151
1
11
11
3
100%
Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet.
Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically.
INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE)
Regular Meeting w /Quorum Type 1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type "1" under "Work Session" for each attending member.
Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member.
Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for ALL members.
Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines.
*A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date /time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is
given, the previously - scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting.
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 17, 2015
10:06 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 10:06 P.M.
ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Brindle, Staunton, Stewart and Chair Hovland. Commissioner
Swenson was absent.
APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the
Meeting Agenda.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2014 APPROVED
Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the
Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for December 3,
2014.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
• BIDS FOR STAIR ELEVATOR TOWER AT SOrH FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT — REJECTED
Executive Director Neal reminded the HRA that the Council approved a feasibility study for the 50th and
France Parking and Way Finding Improvement Project on January 21, 2014, that included $850,000.00 in
construction cost for a stair elevator tower at the northeast corner of the south ramp. To date, the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority had spent just over $1,550,000.00 on the first phases of the project.
Bids were opened on February 10, 2015, and came in 168% higher than the feasibility study costs.
r:
Mr. Neal noted details of the proposed project had been presented during the Council meeting that
included Economic Development Manager Neuendorf reporting where the stair elevator tower would be
located and presenting a sketch of the design. Mr. Neuendorf had explained the challenges of both
alternative sites for the tower and other design options. Staff recommended rejecting all of the bids and
waiting for the "right time" to consider this project again.
Mr. Neal reminded that Public Works Director Olson had updated the Council on the five projects that
had been completed last summer. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Brindle made a motion,
seconded by Commissioner Stewart, rejecting all bids for the Stair Elevator Tower Project at
the south ramp of 50th and France Avenue.
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:07 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Scott Neal, Executive Director
Page I
w9�,1�
o e
v �* �y
•'���ORPORf`1F'9 �
IHHA
Item #: HRA V.
From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action ❑X
Discussion ❑
Date: April 7, 2015 Information ❑
Subject: 7101 France Avenue, Rue de France, Easement Settlement,
Hazelton Road Improvement BA -417
Action Requested:
Approve Settlement Agreement and authorize City Attorney to execute the Stipulation of Settlement.
Information / Background:
This roadway improvement project was authorized by City Council & HRA in June 2013. The majority of
the Hazelton Road Improvement project was completed in 2014. Completion of the final elements is
anticipated in 2015.
The feasibility study showed a schematic of a standard four access point roundabout to serve traffic and four
adjacent properties. This design required the Rue de France and Guitar Center properties to agree on a
cross- access easement. This would allow patrons of each business to share a single driveway to enter and
exit the properties. After prolonged negotiations, the owners were unable to come to an agreement on a
cross - access easement. Staff developed an alternate roundabout design with five access points that would
provide a separate access point for each of the properties and constructed the project with that revised
alignment.
As stated in the feasibility report, "permanent right -or -way and temporary easements will be needed from
the Rue de France, Guitar Center, Szechaun Star, and Byerly's. It is anticipated all right -of -way needed will
be donated by the adjacent properties ".
All easements were donated with the exception of the Rue de France property.
The City negotiated a settlement value for the permanent easement of $142,000. This will be funded by the
Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district.
Staff recommends the City Council approve the Settlement Agreement and authorize the city attorney to
execute the Stipulation of Settlement.
. Attachment:
Stipulation of Settlement
G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \CONTRACTS \2013 \ENG 13 -22 Hazelton Rd Impr\ADMIN\MISC \Item HRA V. 7101 France Ave Easement.docx
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
• ,reBD.com FAEG E DWER
EANIELS
David M. Jann
david.jann @FaegreBD.com
Direct +1612 766 8674
USA , UK . CHINA
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
2200 Wells Fargo Center .90 South Seventh Street
Minneapolis. Minnesota 55402 -3901
Phone +1612 766 7000
Fax +1612 766 1600
March 3, 2015
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Thomas M. Scott
Campbell Knutson Professional Association
1380 Corporate Center Curve, Suite 317
Eagan, MN 55121
Re: Sun Life Prosy in Edina Minnesota
Dear Mr. Scott:
• Enclosed please find two signed copies each of the Grant of Permanent Easement and Stipulation of
Settlement concerning the property owned by Sun Life in Edina, Minnesota. The Grant of Permanent
Easement document is provided to you subject to the following conditions:
1) The Grant of Permanent Easement is hereby delivered in escrow only.
2) You agree to hold the Grant of Permanent Easement in escrow at your law office.
3) You agree to hold the Grant of Permanent Easement in escrow until I authorize you to release it
to the City of Edina, which authorization will be provided when the Edina City Council approves
the Stipulation of Settlement and issues a check payable to Sun Life in the amount $142,000.
4) You agree to comply with items 1 through 3, above, and if you do not, you agree that you will
immediately return the Grant of Permanent Easement document to me.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter, and please do not hesitate to call me should you have any
questions.
Very truly yours,
9", k�
David M. Jann
• JANDM
Enclosures
US.55824655.01
•
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
This Stipulation of Settlement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation ( "Sun Life "). The parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Sun Life will execute and deliver to City a Grant of Permanent Easement in the
form attached hereto as Exhibit A.
a2. The City will pay a total amount of $142,000.00 to Sun Life in settlement of any
and all claims relating to or arising out of the Hazelton Road Improvement Project, the
acquisition by the City of the permanent easement described on Exhibit A hereto, and the Waiver
of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement between the parties, including compensation for damages,
reimbursement for appraisal costs, interest, attorney's fees, right of first refusal pursuant to
Minn. Stat. §117.226, costs and disbursements. Payment will be made within ten (10) days of
receipt of the original Grant of Permanent Easement and approval by the City Council, which
approval shall be considered within thirty (30) days of receipt of this stipulation and easement
from Sun Life.
3. Sun Life shall be responsible for any tenant claims relating to any construction
interferences arising from and directly related to the City's road construction project on the Sun
Life property conducted during the Summer of 2014.
1
1789360
0
is
4. The easement conveyed to the City is subject to the following condition: should the
City at any time in the future alter the configuration of access to and from the property, or uses the
easement rights conveyed to undertake any action that limits or diminishes the visibility of the
property from surrounding roadways, the City shall be responsible for any damages that are
compensable in accordance with applicable law.
5. This Stipulation of Settlement contains all the terms and conditions of the parties'
agreement.
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Date: 520. By:
Thomas M. Scott, #98498
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporate Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
651- 452 -5000
Attorneys for City of Edina
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
OF
Date: , 20�. By
178936v7
Na
Title:
,1
By:
Name: Charles S. Miles
Authorized 6 1gne
Title:
7
0
EXHIBIT A
TO
STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
• and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its
successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for street purposes over, across, on,
under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as
legally described on the attached Exhibit "A ".
The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City,
its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement
premises; and that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City.
1789360
•
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this
day of aul 201S-.
Date: M Ct,2OL I , 20�S-.
STATE OF ��llt`X'cC�.)4'S )
COUNTY OF )ss. )
GRANTOR:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
0
N
Title:
By:
Name: Charles S. Andes
Authorized Signw
Title:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
hvirrV, 20 j , by and
�> , respectively the - < <-� and
�J,, �� r2rc of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, a Delaware
101 J 'n �Za'</i r p Y
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporation Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: 651- 452 -5000
TMS/clh
1789360
NOTARY PUBLI
1\ DONNA M. CALLAHAN
a
Notary Public
.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
MY 0 'nIS3lon Expires
Aprit 4, 2019
0
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcel 18
A permanent easement for street purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1,
Yorktown as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County
Minnesota, which lies southerly and southeasterly of the Line A described as follows:
Line A: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54
seconds East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof, 245.84 feet to the point of beginning of
Line A to be hereinafter described; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds West, 38.35
feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 second East, 7.08 feet; thence southwesterly along a
non - tangential curve, concave the northwest, 23.58 feet, having a radius of 34.00 feet, central angle
of 39 degrees 44 minutes 06 seconds, chord bearing of South 51 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds
West and a chord distance of 23.11 feet; thence continue southwesterly along a compound curve,
tangent to the last described, 65.18 feet, having a radius of 187.50 feet, central angle of 19 degrees
54 minutes 59 seconds, chord bearing of South 81 degrees 07 minutes 09 West and a chord
distance of 64.85 feet; thence North 88 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds West, 100.87 feet; thence
westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, 28.63 feet, having a radius of 1027.00 feet,
central angle of 01 degrees 35 minutes 51 seconds, chord bearing of North 89 degrees 43 minutes
15 seconds West and a chord distance of 28.63 feet; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 49
• seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 123.54 feet the northerly highway easement line as
described in Document Number 2189613.
(Torrens Certificate of Title No. 1367504)
1789360
•
•
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, a Delaware corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "Grantor ", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
does hereby grant unto the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation organized under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, the Grantee, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", its
successors and assigns, forever, a permanent easement for street purposes over, across, on,
under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, as
legally described on the attached Exhibit "A ".
The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns, does covenant with the City,
its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described easement
premises; and that it has the sole right to grant and convey the easements to the City.
0
18029Gvl
0
•
•
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor hereto has signed this document this , d
day of lt/� , 2015-.
Date: Mar, d,,- , 2015-.
STATE OF ��1 C 5SC;.0 �ti�`�' [�)
I )ss.
COUNTY OF d�-� ij ►� )
GRANTOR:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY
O
01
Title:
By: Lj L'
Name: Charles S. Andes
Authorized Signer
Title:
The foregoing instrument was acknowl dged before me this � i� day of
20 , by Iki ,V d • and
_ -S respectively the I r` r 14 l and
--e j tr' of Sun Life Assurance Company of Ca ada, a Delaware
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
317 Eagandale Office Center
1380 Corporation Center Curve
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: 651- 452 -5000
TMS /cjh
180296v1
NOTARY PU LIC
2
DONNA M. CALLAHAN
A Notary Publio
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHU61"I
My Commission EKplrpg
Pill April d, 2019
C
EXHIBIT "A"
Parcel 18
A permanent easement for street purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1,
Yorktown as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County
Minnesota, which lies southerly and southeasterly of the Line A described as follows:
Line A: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54
seconds East, assumed bearing along the east line thereof, 245.84 feet to the point of beginning of
Line A to be hereinafter described; thence South 88 degrees 56 minutes 18 seconds West, 38.35
feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 second East, 7.08 feet; thence southwesterly along a
non - tangential curve, concave the northwest, 23.58 feet, having a radius of 34.00 feet, central angle
of 39 degrees 44 minutes 06 seconds, chord bearing of South 51 degrees 17 minutes 36 seconds
West and a chord distance of 23.11 feet; thence continue southwesterly along a compound curve,
tangent to the last described, 65.18 feet, having a radius of 187.50 feet, central angle of 19 degrees
54 minutes 59 seconds, chord bearing of South 81 degrees 07 minutes 09 West and a chord
distance of 64.85 feet; thence North 88 degrees 55 minutes 20 seconds West, 100.87 feet; thence
westerly along a tangential curve, concave to the south, 28.63 feet, having a radius of 1027.00 feet,
central angle of 01 degrees 35 minutes 51 seconds, chord bearing of North 89 degrees 43 minutes
15 seconds West and a chord distance of 28.63 feet; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes 49
seconds West, tangent to last described curve, 123.54 feet the northerly highway easement line as
• described in Document Number 2189613.
•
(Torrens Certificate of Title No. 1367504)
3
180296v1
II i� PARCEL 3
I II 2
2
II
II HIGHWAj�EASEMENT
PER DOI:.I NO. 21 F 13
U
0
BLOCK 7
ROAD EASEMENT
W. 10 FT, LOT 2, OCK 7
PER Doc. NQ 10 6 34
E.'E- 7A)HING H•7LL 500 °11 ?59,F 119.87 i•1.n1
E.lSEA1ENT00C 92109613
' 13.13 \ _
son•oo'oo••e \
— - S81 1n•u:v 1, 212,61 \ \ \ \\
63.71 — S....... S'
S9D °00.00 "' n- 913.00 'y 145.97 — p ?bo'g167'S6 00 q 30.11
1 =55.09 l -eb.i 6°3 46
0
CD =33.65
1
",
I�
I !.I
a 0 50 100
0
m
w
C
N
PROPOSED PERMANENT ROADWAY, SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA = 2,272 sq ft
i;
0
PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA = 7,614 sq ft
0
x
®
=01x la Avenue South, Suite 300
France Avenue Improvements
ANA •
WSBProectNo. j 1686-400
�/� /�Q Minneapolis, MN 65416
c41
REVISED DATE: 21712014
j/// Q www.wsbeng.com
Easement Parcel Sketch
a
1y
R'T'' °`` °ieS'' "` 763541 -0BW -Fax )63541 -1700
City of Edina, Minnesota
•�ro,M,�
o
Parcel No. 18
INFRASTRUCTURE, ENGINEERING IPLANNING I CONSTRUCTION
Exhibit B
PUBLIC HEARING STATEMENT
Edina City Council Meeting
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Hope Melton
Mayor Hovland and Members of the Edina City Council:
I want to express my gratitude to Peter Musty and his Consultant Team, the Wooddale/
Valley View Planning Team, City Staff, and members of the Planning Commission for
unanimously recommending passage of the Wooddale /Valley View Small Area Plan
(SAP).
have nothing but praise for this plan and the process that created it.
The Plan:
This plan creatively addresses Edina's 21 st century demographic, financial, and
environmental challenges and does so in ways that preserve the unique character of
the Pamela Park and Concord neighborhoods. I strongly support the following items:
Density and building height increases that are essential to addressing our
challenges and are established in appropriate locations, with graceful transitions that
preserve the modest -scale residential nature of surrounding areas.
2. The Active Adult Senior and ownership multi - family housing is appropriate within
this neighborhood context, and will help balance out large increases in rental units in the
nearby Southdale area.
3. The mixed use Neighborhood Node designation encourages small scale and
neighborhood - friendly development with gathering places and walkable transitions.
4. The incorporation of Living Streets elements, with pedestrian, bike ways and
improved lighting, encourage healthy lifestyles and meet the mobility needs of older
adults, the disabled, and the very young.
5. Finally, I endorse how the plan deals with public land. Instead of selling it, public
land is preserved. This enables the City to leverage future private development that will
conform with plan guidelines.
Using public land to leverage neighborhood and environmentally friendly private
development is strategically wise and fiscally responsible. It is simpler and less
expensive than trying to influence development once the land is privately owned.
The Planning Process: The planning process was consistently clear, comprehensive,
and democratic. The citizen engagement component began, appropriately, with
Neighborhood Association meetings where the SAP process was carefully explained,
including clear descriptions of what would occur at each stage of plan development.
Realistic public expectations were thus established from the onset.
Many additional meetings occurred as the plan evolved. Each session provided ample
opportunity for public and one -to -one questions and discussion. In this way, resident
concerns were thoroughly vetted and respectfully addressed throughout the process.
Finally, it is my opinion that this SAP reflects the inspiration and creativity of a truly
successful City /neighborhood collaboration.