Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-05-06 City Council Meeting
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING • CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS WEDNESDAY, MAY 6, 2015 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollc(7ll vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval Of Minutes — Regular Meeting Of April 7, 2015 and, Work Session Of April 7, 2015 B. Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated, 04/23/2015 TOTAL: • $657,940.64 And Per Pre -List Dated 04/30/2015 TOTAL: $933,948.23 C. Approve Traffic Sign Installation And Maintenance Policy D. Request For Purchase — Award of Quote Contract ENG 15 -8NB 2015 Storm Sewer Improvements E. Resolution No. 2015 -44 Joint Powers Agreement With Edina Public Schools For Countryside H Neighborhood Improvement Project F. Promenade Phase 4 — Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant G. Continue To June 16, 2015 Findings Of Fact For Denial, Comprehensive Plan Amendments For Building Height, Density And Floor Area Ratio, 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, (Resolution approval requires a majority vote of Council Members present to pass.) H. Continue To June 16, 2015 Findings Of Fact For Denial, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan, 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC, (Resolution approval requires a majority vote of Council Members present to pass.) 1. Authorizing Settlement With Meisinger Construction Promenade Project V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Proclamation: National Public Works Week B. Proclamation: National Police Week, May 10 -16, 2015 C. Proclamation: Monarch Butterfly Month • D. Proclamation: Preservation Month E. 2015 Edina Heritage Award Agenda May 6, 2015 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS • During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration Of Applications Received For A Cable Communications Franchise (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to pass) B. PUBLIC HEARING— Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Lot Division Procedures, Rezoning Procedures, Sideyard Setback Regulations and R -2 Regulations, Ordinance No. 2015 -07 (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Plat With Lot Width And Area Variances, 5825 Ashcroft Avenue, Jeffrey and Janine Johnson, Resolution No. 2015 -49 (Favorable rollcall vote of three members present to pass) D. PUBLIC HEARING — Living Streets Plan (Favorable vote of majority of Council • Members present to pass.) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. 2014 Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report B. Resolution No. 2015 -46 Accepting Donations & Grants C. Resolution No. 2015 -47 Accepting Three Life Sized Bronzed Sculptures Restricted Donation & Agreement D. Resolution No. 2015 -48 Supporting Affordably- priced Housing At 3330 West 666 Street E. Southdale France Working Group Update IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS • A. Correspondence Agenda May 6, 2015 Page 3 • B. Minutes: 1. Edina Community Health Commission, February 3, and March 3, 2015 2. Transportation Commission, March 19, 2015 3. Human Rights & Relations Commission, March 24, 2015 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA — APRIL 7, 2015 Is V. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -01 SUPPORTING APPLICATION OF BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE FOR HOUSING TAX CREDITS FROM MHFA VI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Wed May 6 Work Session — Braemar Master Plan 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Park Strategic Plan Draft 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed May 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 19 Work Session — Grandview Development Alternatives 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 25 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues June 2 Work Session — Parking & Future of City Owned Properties 50th & France 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Affordable Housing 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues June 16 Work Session —joint Meeting with Edina Transportation Commission 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting with Bike Edina 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri July 3 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sat July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE Tues July 7 Work Session — Sidewalk & Street Maintenance 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Utility Rate Study Tues July 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 21 Work Session — Business Meeting/201 -2017 Proposed Budget 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL • HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 21, 2015 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the meeting agenda as revised to remove Item IV.N. Request for Purchase, Two 2015 Ford Focus Sedans for the Assessing Division and add Item VIII.E. Resolution No. 2015 -43 Sponsoring Application for Metropolitan Council Livable Community Grant, 66 West Apartments. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.L. Request for Purchase, 2015 John Deere Tractor for Public Works, as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of April 7, 2015 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 9, 2015, and consisting of 33 pages; General Fund $286,339.99; Police Special Revenue $3,305.94; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $337.30; Arts and Culture Fund $900.00; City Hall Debt Service $975.00; Working Capital Fund $91,351.09; Equipment Replacement Fund $240,143.73; Art Center Fund $6,349.13; Golf Dome Fund $1,772.55; Aquatic Center Fund $4,271.62; Golf Course Fund $28,074.82; Ice Arena Fund $57,612.26; Sports Dome Fund $26,714.27; Edinborough Park Fund $3,761.96; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,072.62; Liquor Fund $227,762.45; Utility Fund $153,716.45; Storm Sewer Fund $15,492.01; PSTF Agency Fund $12,173.47; Centennial TIF District $17,924.32; TOTAL $1,184,050.98 and for receipt of payment of claims dated April 16, 2015, and consisting of 37 pages; General Fund $1,070,341.42; Police Special Revenue $1 1,764.80; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund $2,197.00; Arts and Culture Fund $49.00; Working Capital Fund $48,418.48; Equipment Replacement Fund $99.11; Art Center Fund $3,417.19; Golf Dome Fund $315.00; Aquatic Center Fund $627.88; Golf Course Fund $196,398.03; Ice Arena Fund $55,824.45; Sports Dome Fund $17,145.68; Edinborough Park Fund $2,802.23; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,486.00; Liquor Fund $123,942.90; Utility Fund $424,053.82; Storm Sewer Fund $37.65; Recycling Fund $36,187.38; PSTF Agency Fund $11,463.45; Payroll Fund $11,753.70; TOTAL $2,019,325.17; and, Credit Card Transactions dated January 26 — February 25, 2015; TOTAL $49,749.95 IV.C. Approve Community Health Commission Resignation and Alternate Appointment IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -37, Calling May 6, 2015 Public Hearing to Consider Cable Television Franchise IV.E. Request for Purchase, Construction Materials Testing Service for Arden Park D Neighborhood Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Braun Intertec Corporation at $28,596.00 IV.F. Request for Purchase, Construction Materials Testing Service for Valley View Road Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Braun Intertec Corporation at $24,945.00 Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 21, 2015 W.G. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid Bridge Portion of Contract ENG 15 -3 Arden Park D and 54th Street Project, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Northwest Asphault, Inc. at $739,812.35 is IV.H. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -38, Local Bridge Replacement Program for 54th Street Bridge IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -39, Setting Public Hearing to be held on May 19, 2015 for TH 100 Noise Wall Improvements IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -40, Declaring the 2015 "Open Streets on 50th" Event as an Official City of Edina Event IV.K. Authorize Agreement with Minneapolis Institute of Arts W.L. �c�for -rPur -mc, -5 Tractor for Public Works �te9� Eh� °^ �A I �eFrn Eleel�.. .�<<o,�o,� �,. IV.M. Request for Purchase; 2015 Commodities Purchase - 1. Ready Mix Bituminous Materials, 2. Concrete, 3. Hydrofluosilicic Acid, 4. Liquid Chlorine, 5. Polyphosphate Ortho - phosphate Blend Water Treatment Chemical -50/50 Blend, 6. Tonkazorb 3 %, 7. Caustic Soda, 8. Covers and Castings; awarding the bids to the recommended low bidders as follows: I a. (SPNWB330B) MnDOT Non -Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $42.25 per ton; lb. (SPWEA340B) MnDOT Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $46.20 per ton; 1c. (SPWEB340B) MnDOT Wear SpecNo. 2360 to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) at $42.20 per ton; 2a. Concrete Type 3A32 -1 - 3900 Ibs Approximately 200 cubic yards to AVR (delivered) at $141.00 per cubic yard ( <6yd, including surcharge); 2b. Concrete Type 3A32 -1 - 3900 Ibs Approximately 400 cubic yards to AVR (delivered) at $117.00 per cubic yard ( >6yd); 3. Hydrofluosilicic Acid Approximately 123,000 Ibs to Hawkins (delivered) at $27.97 per cwt; 4. Liquid Chlorine Approximately 130,000 Ibs per year to Hawkins (delivered) at $33.98 per cwt; S. Polyphosphate Ortho- phosphate Blend Water Treatment Chemical -50/50 Blend Approximately 9,800 Gallons to Hawkins (delivered) at $4.91 per cwt; 6. Tonkazorb 3% Approximately 11,000 Gallons to Hawkins (delivered) at $12.53 per cwt; 7. Caustic Soda Approximately 1,000 Gallons to Hawkins (delivered) at $33.00 per cwt; 8a. Sanitary Sewer - R1733 with Self Sealing Solid Cover (or approved equal) to ESS at $269.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $150.00 each for Casting Only, and $119.00 each for Lid Only; 8b. Storm Sewer - Round Lid R2548 (or approved equal) to ESS at $429.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $150.00 each for Casting Only, and $279.00 each for Lid Only; 8c. Storm Sewer - Rectangular 3067V (or approved equal) to ESS at $368.00 each for Complete Casting and Lid, $120.00 each for Casting Only, and $135.00 each for Lid Only; 8d. Cost of Curb Box to ESS at $112.00 each. M.N. Request for Purchase, Two 2015 Ford Focus Sedans for the Assessing Division Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.L. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, 2015 JOHN DEERE TRACTOR FOR PUBLIC WORKS - APPROVED The Council requested that staff include information on alternative vehicles with lower emissions when vehicle proposals were submitted. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve the Request for Purchase, 2015 John Deere Tractor for Public Works, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, Scharber & Sons, Minnesota Wanner Co., State Contract No. 74050 at $86,430.23. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION - PROCLAIMED Page 2 • 0 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 21, 2015 Mayor Hovland read the Arbor Day Proclamation. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to proclaim April 24, 2015 as Arbor Day in the City of Edina, Minnesota. • Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V.B. MUNICIPAL CLERK'S WEEK, MAY 3-9,201S —PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the Municipal Clerks Week Proclamation. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to proclaim the week of May 3 through May 9, 2015 as Municipal Clerk's Week. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V.C. BUILDING SAFETY MONTH, MAY 2015 —PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read the Building Safety Month Proclamation. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to proclaim the month of May 2015 as Building Safety Month. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. David Fisher, Chief Building Official, accepted the Proclamation and thanked the Council. V.D. MARCH SPEAK UP EDINA REPORT PRESENTED — TOPIC: STREET LIGHTS Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of March opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to Street Lights. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. • VI.A. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING LOT DIVISION PROCEDURES, REZONING PROCEDURES, SIDEYARD SETBACK REGULATIONS AND R -2 REGULATIONS — CONTINUED TO MAY 6, 2015 Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to continue the Public Hearing to May 6, 2015. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. PRELIMINARY PLAT, BLAKE WOODS, 5321 AND 5331 EVANSWOOD LANE, AND 5320 AND 5324 BLAKE ROAD, FRANK BERMAN — CONTINUED TO JUNE 2, 2015 Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to continue the Public Hearing to June 2, 2015. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. PROJECT UPDATE — TRACY AVENUE, VALLEY VIEW ROAD, VALLEY NE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS — RECEIVED Engineer Millner updated the Council on the Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road, Valley Lane Intersec ion Improvement Project. The project sought to address concerns about traffic speeds, traffic queuing, st rm water drainage, remaining service life of the watermain, and the box culvert on Valley Lane for pedest ians • and bicyclists crossing Tracy Avenue while using the future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Mr. Mil ner presented a map of the project location, existing conditions, project concept, funding plan, and pr ject timeline. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 21, 2015 The Council asked questions relating to optimal routes for trail users and communication with both the Edina Transportation Commission and Three Rivers Park District. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -41 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND • IZ0lJ,kTGVd101 M Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -41 accepting various grants and donations. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -42 ACCEPTING DONATION AND APPROVING AGREEMENT EDINA SOCCER CLUB — ADOPTED Braemar Arena and Field General Manager Miller shared that the Edina Soccer Club approached the City with a proposal to provide a restricted donation to purchase a Sport Court for futsal at Braemar Arena. The City would enter into a formal agreement with the Edina Soccer Club. In exchange for the donation, the Edina Soccer Club would receive up to 500 scheduled practice hours for 15 years or the life of the Sport Court. Ms. Miller presented the history of futsal and the agreement with the Edina Soccer Club. Jeff Norththrup, Vice President of the Edina Soccer Club, answered questions of the Council relating to operating dates and the Club's position on the proposed agreement. The Council with the concurrence of Attorney Knutson amended the language of the proposed agreement. Paragraph 3. MONTHS OF OPERATION. should read, "Weather permitting; the futsal court shall generally be open two weeks after ice is removed from the rink until October 15th annually, subject to being closed for maintenance." Also, Sentence I of Paragraph 4. TERM. should read, "The term of this Agreement shall commence on May I, 2015 and shall end November I, 2030, or at the end of the useful life of the Sport Court as determined by the City, whichever first occurs." The Council asked questions relating to repairs and flooring. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -42, Accepting Donation and Approving Agreement Edina Soccer Club as amended. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, SPORT COURT FOR BRAEMAR ARENA — APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the Request for Purchase, Sport Court for Braemar Arena, awarding the bid to the recommended bidder, C &C Courts, Inc. at $55,440.40. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -43 SPONSORING APPLICATION FOR METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LIVABLE COMMUNITY GRANT, 66 WEST APARTMENTS — ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf shared that in October 2014, the City approved the final rezoning for 3330 West 60th Street to reflect the needs of a proposed housing project by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. The developer had acquired the property and was preparing funding applications. One highly competitive grant program was the Metropolitan Council's Livable Communities Accounts. The terms of the Livable Communities Account program did not allow private developers to submit • funding requests. Instead, developers partnered with municipalities and the municipality would serve as the legal sponsor of the grant application. Staff recommended that the City act as the sponsor of this grant application. Page 4 The Council asked questions relating to the requirements and legal responsibilities of the City. Th Council amended the language of Paragraph I I of Resolution No. 2015 -43 to read, "Be It Furthe • Resolved, that the City, by its agreeing to act as legal sponsor for the grant application for the Projec has no obligation to the Metropolitan Council or to Beacon, to approve any land use, permitting, or an other current or future request including any financing of the project related to any current or futur proposed development of 3330 West 66th Street by Beacon." Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2015 -43, Agreement ti Sponsor a Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA Funding Application for the Redevelopment of 3330 West 66th Street, as amended. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MARCH 12, 2015 2. PARK BOARD, MARCH 10, 2015 3. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, MARCH 10, 2015 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE — Received • XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 6, 2015. Video Copy of the April 21, 2015, meeting available. Page 5 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES • OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 21, 2015 5:33 P.M. Mayor Hovland reconvened the City Council in open session at 5:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Brindle, Staunton, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Stewart entered the meeting at 5:37 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Finance Director and Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director. Also in attendance was David Beurle, future iQ Partners. VISON EDINA David Beurle, future iQ Partners and Assistant City Manager Kurt presented the draft VISION EDINA strategic vision and framework. The City Council went through draft VISION EDINA offering suggestions for edits to the documents which included: adding health into the mission statement, incorporating housing diversity in the section "Balancing Edina's Redevelopment ", changes to the Transportation Options. Enhancing Our Community Fabric and Character, and Regional Leadership sections. Staff will incorporate the edits and present the final documents for adoption sometime in May. • 2016 -17 PROPOSED WORK PLAN Ms. Kurt reviewed the 2016 -2017 proposed work plan noting the following changes were added following the Council retreat: • An additional theme titled "Future Planning" was added to reflect to the depth of work that will need to be completed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan. Some items were reorganized based on this addition. Future Development is organized by specific sites; Future Planning is organized by districts. • It was difficult to identify specific tactics relative to Intergovernmental Relations. Instead, the intent would be to provide quarterly updates with respect to interactions and progress with key government partners. • Infrastructure financing was added to the Transportation theme. • Enterprise Stability includes developing business plans for each of our enterprises. Once those plans are developed, we would provide quarterly updates on our progress. Scott will be working with each of the enterprises to identify appropriate financial targets by the end of this year. The Council offered their comments to staff noting the work plan would be finalized in conjunction with the 2016 -2017 operating budget later in the year. BUSINESS MEETING Finance Director Roggeman presented a brief synopsis of the City's finances. He gave an unaudited 2014 Preliminary General Fund summary showing that 2014 revenue were at 104% of budget, expenditures were 99% of budget and that license and permit revenue was 137% of budget. It was noted that the General Fund transfer from the liquor fund had been cancelled due to a lower net profit, but that during 2014 the City received $750,000 in Park Dedication funds. Mr. Roggeman • reviewed the revenue for 2014 for the Utilities Fund, Liquor Fund Operating Revenue and Operating Income, Aquatic Center Operating Revenue, Golf Course Fund Operating Revenue, Arena Operating Revenue, Art Center Operating Revenue, Edinborough Operating Revenue, and Centennial Lakes Operating Revenue. Mr. Roggeman noted there be unallocated reserves in the Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /April 21, 2015 General Fund, however, at a lower amount than in recent years. He said staff would be back at the completion of the City's audit with a recommendation for the best use of the 204 unallocated • reserves. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 6, 2015 James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 • L • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 1244 4/23/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 19.20 107.20 145.60 • CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 369804 1879485 5862.5515 369806 1880834 5862.5515 369803 1880835 5842.5515 369805 3500035523 5862.5515 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX is 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 1 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 274.40 1245 4123/2015 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 129.00 EXTINGUISHER MOUNTS & SIGNS 369908 136486 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 129.00 1246 4/23/2015 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 106.50 369743 47763400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,738.45 369813 47869500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.55 369812 47869600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 80.70 369815 47869700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 36.55 369816 47869800 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,193,85 369810 47869900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 818.40 369811 47870000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 207.24 369667 91834600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 91.90 369814 91871000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 140.84 369817 91871100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,450.98 1247 4/23/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 68.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369696 OE- 390630 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 101.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369657 WO- 108668 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 89.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369656 WO- 109376 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 16.82 MOUSE PAD 369655 WO- 109395 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 61.05 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369910 WO- 109679 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 9.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369911 WO- 109935 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 9.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 369909 WO- 110093 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 20.50 COMBINATION LOCKS 00009389 369695 WO- 992358 -3 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 376.88 1248 4/23/2015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 185.88 VALVE 00005243 369700 5243 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 221.08 ROD ASSEMBLY, NUTS 00005241 369699 947488 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.83 LAMPASSEMBLY 00005248 369701 949013 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183.48 COOLANT, NUTS 00005251 369778 950586 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 614.27 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1248 412312015 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS Continued... 1249 4123/2015 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 30,449.36 LEGAL COUNSEL 369942 2851 -3115 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV- LEGAL CITYATTORNEY 30,449.36 1250 4/23/2015 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 29.66 ENG GETAC ACCESSORIES 00004317 369658 TH15012 5924.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 29.66 ENG GETAC ACCESSORIES 00004317 369658 TH15012 5925.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 29.66 ENG GETAC ACCESSORIES 00004317 369658 TH15012 5960.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 2,394.11 TABLET MOUNT 00004303 369659 TJ89828 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,110.50 HP 8005 00004329 369660 TP72746 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 128.82 HP SB 65WS 00004329 369661 TP87949 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,722.41 1251 4/23/2015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,271.72 369749 798503 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 49.20 369748 798504 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,592.05 369746 798505 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 48.00 369747 796506 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,919.70 369825 798536 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 49.20 369826 798537 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,929.87 1252 4/23/2015 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 889.08 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001675 369923 14120 5919.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAINING 799.64 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 369995 14129 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 775.61 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 369994 14130 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,895.00 SEWER UPGRADE 369948 14131 03482.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION CLOVER LAKE NHOOD RECON 6,359.33 1253 4/23/2015 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 2,078.23 MAIL APR 2015 BILLS 369791 101391 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,078.23 1254 4/23/2015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 285.00 TIRES 00005966 369921 150045566 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.00 1255 412312015 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 176.00 REMOVE CARD READERS 369644 70402 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 0 • 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4123/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1255 4/23/2015 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. Continued... 2,073.78 CONDUIT PATHWAY INSTALLATION 370009 70537 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,249.78 1256 4/23/2015 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 185.85 370011 0057164 -IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 1,276.60 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 370010 0057183 -IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 1,464.45 1257 4/23/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 108.50 BUSINESS CARDS 369730 85707 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 108.50 1258 4/23/2015 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 227.00 369681 15 -11211 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 227.00 1259 4/23/2015 101004 SPS COMPANIES 80.75 PIPING REPAIR PARTS 00001775 369938 S3067099.001 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 80.75 1260 4/2312015 101015 STREICHERS 39.99 SWAT UNIFORM 369734 11145868 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 48.98 SWAT UNIFORMS 369733 11146269 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 8B.97 1261 4/2312015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 62.25 HANDLE 00005239 369735 68545 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.25 1262 4/23/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 114.50 369891 0121846 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 127.50 369889 0122406 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 114.50 369890 0122407 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 356.50 1263 4/23/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 493.83 CONCESSION PRODUCT 370024 41934709 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 928.31 370025 42170648 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,422.14 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1264 4/23/2015 103219 WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE INC. Continued... 1,100.00 CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 369643 341723 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 1,100.00 1265 4123/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,285.45 369686 389576 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 408.25 369894 389967 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,418.63 369896 390175 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,082.42 369897 390193 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,449.55 369895 390320 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,644.30 392830 4/23/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS 149.00 RATCHET KIT 00005228 369693 3307819 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.00 392831 4123/2015 135195 ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP 180.00 MAR 2015 ADMIN FEES 369969 26737 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 180.00 392832 4/23/2015 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 13,750.00 BANQUET RM SOUND SYSTEM 369694 SYSINV16057DB 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 13,750.00 392833 4/23/2015 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 80.90 PAPER 369645 10432199 -00 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 874.94 PAPER 369645 10432199 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 955.84 392834 4123/2015 132067 AOT PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION 3,780.00 SOFTWARE LICENSE RENEWAL 369777 EDINA -04 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,780.00 392835 4/2312015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 798.00 369665 3025953 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,124.60 369666 3025954 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 80.00 369809 3027127 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 656.50 369807 3027129 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,566.50 369808 3027130 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,225.60 • • 0 0 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 5 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS 143.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT • 210034 5520.5510 • ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 369821 211759 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 256.05 369820 211760 Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 686.00 369818 211761 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 316.62 369819 211762 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 392836 4123/2015 ART SUPPLIES 00009404 100256 AT &T MOBILITY 166279 Continued... CRAFT SUPPLIES 34.99 PD SQUAD DATA CARD 369662 287257682821 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 34.99 125.14 392837 4/23/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 144.00 PIZZA 369970 D2813306 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003570 369952 144.00 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 392838 412312015 369951 125139 BERNICK'S 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 0 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 5 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA CONCESSIONS 143.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 369971 210034 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 20.00 369821 211759 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 256.05 369820 211760 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 686.00 369818 211761 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 316.62 369819 211762 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,846.50 1,421.67 369823 125986 5842.5513 5,219.00 392839 4/23/2015 126003 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 7,065.50 255.50 COFFEE 369972 T92905 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD UNIFORM PURCHASE 255.50 041615 1301.6201 51.41 392840 4123/2015 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,113.10 53.89 ART SUPPLIES 00009404 369698 166279 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 71.25 ART SUPPLIES 00009403 369697 4351086 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 125.14 392841 4123/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 117.29 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003570 369952 81753156 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 322.99 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003570 369951 81754441 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 440.28 392842 4/23/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,846.50 369823 125986 5842.5513 5,219.00 369822 126003 5862.5513 7,065.50 392843 4/23/2015 132976 BUCKLEY, TOM 51.41 UNIFORM PURCHASE 369973 041615 1301.6201 51.41 392844 4/2312015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,113.10 369745 557399 5842.5514 ARENA CONCESSIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392844 4/23/2015 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES Continued... 634.35 369744 561771 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,747.45 392845 4/23/2015 129923 CAWLEY 160.89 NAME BADGES 369640 V284549 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 160.89 392846 4/23/2015 101815 CENTRAIRE INC. 4,123.00 HVAC 369976 APPL NO 1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 4,123.00 392847 4/23/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 98.91 612 E77 -0056 RICHFIELD 911 369702 0056 -04/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 590.03 612 E01 -0426 369647 0426 -4/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 104.90 612 E23 -0652 E911 369703 0652 -4/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 59.38 952 835 -1161 369704 1161 -4115 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 156.70 952 285 -2951 369912 2951 -4/15 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 207.67 952 835 -6661 369705 6661 -4/15 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 590.03 612 E12 -6797 369648 6797 -4/15 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,807.62 392848 4/23/2015 135835 CENTURYLINK 1,335.45 612 -D08- 2053 -053 369646 2053 -4/15 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 1,335.45 392849 4/23/2015 100683 CHEMSEARCH 669.12 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 369974 1868870 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 669.12 392850 4/23/2015 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 32.19 CHC MEETING MEALS 369779 PH1227 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 32.19 392851 4/23/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 957.27 00082050- 0200650009 369649 200650009 -4/15 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 49.84 00082050- 0200650018 369650 200650018 -4/15 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 97.61 00121223 - 0200619007 369953 2008190070 -4/15 9232.6189 SEWER & WATER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 78.21 00102561- 0200862003 369653 200862003 -4/15 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 121.34 00102561- 0203163003 369652 203163003 -4/15 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 24.12 00114064 - 0203163012 369651 203163012 -4/15 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS • 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392851 4/23/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued... 1,328.39 392852 4/23/2015 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 3,303.96 HOT MIX 369975 IN00008328 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 3,303.96 392853 4123/2015 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 299.52 369824 0138021520 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 299.52 392854 4/23/2015 120433 COMCAST 24.78 8772 10 614 0023973 369706 23973 -4/15 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 83.84 8772 10 614 0540232 369913 540232 -4/15 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 108.62 392855 412312015 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,026.43 CABLE TV ADS 369707 040615 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,026.45 CABLE TV ADS 369707 040615 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,026.45 CABLE TV ADS 369707 040615 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 596.00 ADVERTISING 369963 NW638218 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 3,675.33 392866 4/23/2015 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 107.40 HEATER CORE REPAIR 369780 21822 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.40 392857 4/2312015 117052 CORNELIUS, TODD 108.00 MODEL 369977 041715 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108.00 392858 4/23/2015 134650 CRAWFORD, LINDY 85.79 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 369781 041415 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 15.00 CONFERENCE 369914 APMP -4/15 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 100.79 392859 4/2312015 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC. - DARE 279.58 DARE SUPPLIES 00003128 369782 81635 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 279.58 392860 4/2312015 105670 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392860 4/23/2015 105570 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING Continued... 21.60 PERMIT REFUND 369915 ED138708 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 21.60 392861 4/23/2015 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 440.00 ST 1 PUMP SUMP 369955 106500 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 775.00 ST. 2 ANNUAL SERVICE 369954 106501 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,215.00 392862 4123/2015 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,585.70 MAY 2015 PREMIUM 369916 F018342 -5/15 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,585.70 392863 4/23/2015 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 58.80 jaw 369943 991797 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 148.80 AUTO TEST LEAD KIT 00005211 369944 993805 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 105.80 IMPACTADAPTER 00005250 369945 995144 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN. 313.40 392864 4/23/2015 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 915.00 LEGAL FEES 369978 2008878 9238.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 7,140.00 LEGAL FEES 369979 2008879 9238.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 255.00 TRADEMARK REGISTRATION 369980 2009568 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 8.310.00 392865 4123/2015 101837 EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 25.00 ALARM - EDINA ART CENTER 369981 15208 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 25.00 392866 4/23/2015 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 307.50 TIF REPORTING 369982 66832 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 1,127.50 TIF CALCULATIONS 369983 66833 9238.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 735.00 GRANDVIEW TIF DIST 369984 66975 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 262.50 TIF CALCULATIONS 369985 66976 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,677.50 UTILITY RATE STUDY 369783 67279 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 892.50 TIF CALCULATIONS 369986 67280 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 105.00 PENTAGON PARK TIF 369987 67281 9240.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 1,050.00 BRAEMAR GOLF STUDY 369784 67282 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 1,627.50 66 WEST APARTMENTS TIF 369988 67283 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 8,785.00 0 9 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/2112015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4123/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392867 4/2312015 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. Continued... 1,318.40 PUSHBUMPERS, FENDER BARS 369708 AW030515 -12B 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 562.29 CARAVAN UNDERCOVER LIGHTBAR 369709 AW040215 -7 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,880.69 392868 4/23/2016 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 31.63 BATTERY 00005150 369716 1- Z04101 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.71 SENSOR 369918 69- 172118 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.65 BRAKE DRUMS, SHOE SET 369713 69- 173106 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 172.09 PAD SET, ROTORS 369785 69- 173358 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.48 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES, BRAKES 369715 69- 173359 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.71 SENSOR 369786 69- 173476 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.07 WATER PUMPS 369711 69- 174302 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.44 THERMOSTAT 369710 69- 174312 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.71 PUMP KIT 369712 69- 174373 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 303.03 SWITCH 369917 69- 174559 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.35 BRAKE PAD KIT, ROTORS 369946 69- 174698 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.44 SUPER DUTY PADS 369714 70- 226163 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,574.31 392869 4/23/2015 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 567.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 369989 3859439 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 567.09 392870 4/2312016 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC. 98.39 SENSOR 00005245 369787 8715 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.39 392871 4/23/2016 130699 FLEETPRIDE 22.10 REPAIRS 369717 67770814 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.75 LAMP 369919 67918971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 63.85 392872 4123/2015 136185 FLOISTAD, PETE 5.82 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 369922 041615 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 80.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 369922 041615 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 85.82 392873 4/23/2015 135932 FLYNN, LAUREN 216.00 MODEL 369990 041715 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 216.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392873 412312015 135932 FLYNN, LAUREN Continued... 392874 412312015 136188 FORD, LYNDSEY 475.00 9/26/15 RENTAL 369920 REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 392875 4/23/2015 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 150.00 INTERPRETER SERVICES 369924 4034 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 392876 4/23/2016 100776 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 219.00 SKATE SHARPENING 369991 89023 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 219.00 392877 4/23/2015 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. 13,150.00 2015 NEOGOV 369654 INV14244 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 13,150.00 392878 4123/2015 101103 GRAINGER 20.96 PAINT MARKERS 00005152 369788 9708641684 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 382.08 REFLECTIVE TAPE 00005152 369788 9708641684 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 102.24 LEATHER GLOVES 00005152 369718 9708943262 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 505.28 392879 4/23/2016 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,824.75 369668 180095 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 409.00 369828 180461 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 246.75 369829 180462 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 484.50 369827 180487 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,965.00 392880 4/23/2015 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC - 103.17 SEQUENCER 00001776 369925 140725 -1 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 227.90 VOLTAGE MONITOR 00001782 369926 140742 -1 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 331.07 392881 4/23/2015 132996 HAMMARGREN & MEYER P.A. 2,215.19 COOLAIR MECHANICAL MATTER 369992 18482 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADM INISTRATION 2,215.19 392882 4123/2015 135971 HANSON, JACKIE • • • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/2112015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392882 4/23/2015 135971 HANSON, JACKIE Continued... 100.00 PROGRAM REFUND 369641 REFUND 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 392883 4/23/2015 100797 HAWKINS INC. 7,207.84 CHEMICALS 00001246 369947 3713491 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 7,207.84 392884 4/23/2015 100798 HAYDEN- MURPHY EQUIPMENT 368.90 SPACER RING 00005237 369789 C94161 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,876.92 CHAIN, BEARINGS, FACE SEALS 00005237 369790 C94452 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,245.82 392885 4/23/2015 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 231.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE LICENSE 369993 0061054 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 231.00 392886 4/23/2015 101680 HIAWATHA LUMBER CO. 1,547.40 LUMBER 00003589 369956 162129 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,547.40 392887 4/23/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 393.00 369750 757202 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 58.00 369751 757203 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,720.50 369830 757353 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 58.00 369831 757354 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,229.50 392888 4/23/2015 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 369719 041415 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 175.00 392889 4/2312016 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 342.00 369832 28157 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 342.00 392890 412312015 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 150.00 DUES (3) 369792 CARRIE,CASSI,TE 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES RRI 225.00 CONFERENCE (3) 369792 CARRIE,CASSI,TE 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES RRI R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392890 4/23/2015 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA Continued... 375.00 392891 412312015 136187 JENSEN, NICHOLAS 475.00 7/25/15 RENTAL 369927 REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 475.00 392892 4/23/2015 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 15.99 GLOVES 369720 03 /15- ENGINEERI 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION NG 15.99 392893 4/23/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 99.50 369669 2329658 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,457.16 369670 2334993 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,335.40 369833 2349426 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,514.02 369834 2349433 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 39.05 369835 2349434 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13,445.13 392894 4/23/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 369.57 369672 5133802 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 238.90 369673 5133805 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 692.54 369674 5133807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.16 369671 5133808 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 192.00 369851 5134150 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 835.26 369842 5139029 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 54.10 369839 5139030 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 243.56 369843 5139031 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 217.32 369838 5139035 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3.48 369850 5139036 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,766.20 369837 5139040 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,197.93 369836 5139042 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,591.30 369840 5139044 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE YORK SELLING 1.16 369841 5139046 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,959.43 369852 5139047 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 935.93 369845 5139048 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING 198.63 369848 5139049 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,524.33 369844 5139050 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 906.95 369847 5139051 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .20 369853 5139052 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING • • • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4123/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392894 4/23/2015 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 8,061.27 369846 5139053 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 51.16 369849 5139054 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15.00- 369854 520018 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 23.63- 369855 520019 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29.16- 369675 520487 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.63- 369752 520745 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24,900.96 392895 4123/2015 111018 KEEPRS INC. 603.96 UNIFORMS 00003590 369957 272275 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 603.96 392896 4/23/2015 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 18.28 KEYS 00001749 369721 S1018512 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.28 392897 4/2312015 124611 LARSCO INC. 726.05 TANK, TUBING 00001557 369928 3354 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 1,484.67 REBUILD KITS 00001731 369929 3355 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 2,210.72 392898 4/23/2016 133050 LARSON, CINDY 50.00 SLUC REGISTRATION 369793 REIMBURSE 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 50.00 392899 4123/2015 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 404.93 NUTS, WASHERS, DRILL BITS 00005240 369794 9303187502 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 311.13 FUEL TUBING 00005240 369722 9303187503 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 716.06 392900 4/23/2015 104670 LAWYER NURSERY INC. 301.96 PLANTINGS 00001598 369930 10145427 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 301.96 392901 4/23/2015 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 3,381.00 INSURANCE COVERAGE 369996 962671 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,381.00 392902 4/23/2015 116575 LIFELINE INC. 3,599.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 369723 LL -6289 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 -- 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 392902 4/23/2015 116575 LIFELINE INC. Continued... 3,599.00 392903 4/23/2015 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 1,872.43 4' FROG, SHAFTS, SPRINGS 00005179 369795 00056259 1,872.43 392904 4/2312015 100858 LOGIS 630.00 369999 39966 3,121.00 369999 39966 3,666.00 369999 39966 4,040.00 369999 39966 5,969.00 369999 39966 6,098.00 369999 39966 5,935.00 369999 39966 2,244.37 INSIGHT LICENSES 369998 40021 16,295.00 INSIGHT LICENSES 369997 40050 47,998.37 392905 4123/2015 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 1,161.89 ACTUATOR REPAIRS 369796 5 -15174 1,161.89 392906 412312015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 17,840.16 FUEL 00005230 369949 404618 17,840.16 392907 412312015 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 191.16 OXYGEN 00003649 369959 11104658 270.68 OXYGEN 369958 11127889 461.84 392908 412312015 101292 MEDZIS, ANDREW 448.68 IAAI CONFERENCE 369960 EXPENSES 448.68 392909 412312016 134387 MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC. 185.09 FPW PUBLIC OUTREACH 370003 74317 185.09 392910 4/23/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER • 1553.6530 1554.6230 1554.6160 1495.6160 1160.6160 1556.6160 1190.6160 5902.6160 1160.6160 1160.6160 1553.6180 1553.6581 1470.6510 1470.6510 1470.6104 REPAIR PARTS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS FINANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES ASSESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT • • • 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 15 Business Unit ncvc1awnL6jkj PSTF FIRE TOWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING HUMAN RESOURCES GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT COMMUNICATIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4123/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 392910 4123/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 1,987.50 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001674 369931 34919 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,987.50 392911 4123/2015 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 31.29 CO2, METHANE 369964 171124410 7413.6545 CHEMICALS 31.29 392912 4/2312015 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 10.73 WINDOW WASHING 369724 928037123 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10.73 392913 4123/2015 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 258.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 369725 2200101658 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 258.00 392914 4123/2015 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 70.00 EDINALIQUORADS 369642 158143 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 70.00 EDINALIQUORADS 369642 158143 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 70.00 EDINA LIQUOR ADS 369642 158143 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 210.00 392915 4/2312015 102233 MINNESOTA PRIMA 50.00 DUES 369637 2015 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50.00 392916 4/23/2015 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 54.00 GRANDVIEW POSTERS 370000 17129 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 279.00 GRANDVIEW POSTCARDS 370001 17237 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 54.00 GRANDVIEW POSTERS 370002 17238 9234.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 58.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTERS 369726 17443 1130.6575 PRINTING 96.00 NITE GLOW GOLF POSTERS 369726 17443 5410.6575 PRINTING 543.00 392917 412312015 102577 MISTER CAR WASH 494.70 CAR WASH COUPONS 369727 5822 1553.6238 CAR WASH 494.70 392918 412312015 108537 MOORE, JOEL 272.44 UNIFORM PURCHASE 369728 041315 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 272.44 • 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 15 Business Unit ncvc1awnL6jkj PSTF FIRE TOWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING HUMAN RESOURCES GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT COMMUNICATIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392918 4/23/2015 108537 MOORE, JOEL Continued... 392919 4/23/2015 101575 MUNICIPALS 240.00 2015 SPRING WORKSHOP 370004 MAY 7 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 240.00 392920 4/2312015 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 51.31 14309180 PARTS 369729 033115 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.44 14309180 PARTS 369729 033115 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 109.75 392921 412312015 136184 NGUYEN, NGUYEN 59.76 STEEL TOE BOOTS 369932 REIMBURSE 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 59.76 392922 4/23/2015 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 132.82 FLASHER 00005091 369798 38513 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.82 392923 4/2312015 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 24.69 369933 W15030645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 24.69 369933 W15030645 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 49.38 369933 W15030645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.07 369933 W15030645 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 74.07 369933 W15030645 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 172.83 369933 W15030645 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 271.59 369933 W15030645 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 49.38 369933 W15030645 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 24.69 369933 W15030645 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 98.76 369933 W15030645 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 111.10 369933 W15030645 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 111.11 369933 W15030645 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 49.38 369933 W15030645 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 74.07 369933 W15030645 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 74.07 369933 W15030645 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 49.38 369933 W15030645 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 260.70 369934 W15030650 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1,593.96 392924 4/23/2015 136186 OMAN, KRISTIN 75.00 7/25/15 RENTAL 369935 REFUND 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE • • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/2312015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 392924 4/23/2015 50TH ST SELLING 136186 OMAN, KRISTIN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 75.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 392925 4/23/2015 YORK SELLING 136189 P &W GOLF SUPPLY LLC 5520.5510 539.54 GOLF BALLS, PENCILS 47741411 539.54 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 392926 4/23/2015 7762 LOCHMERE 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 478.71 TER 1,891.17 475.38 2,424.06 310.50 5,579.82 392927 412312015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 330.00 188.67 785.79 296.17 1,600.63 392928 4/23/2015 136190 PETERSON, JAMES 14.85 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 14.85 392929 4/2312016 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 414.21 57.16 1,518.84 73.16 157.60 .20 289.80 74.32 .09 2,086.40 1,535.07 379.16 2,256.05 369936 324765 369676 8493858 -IN 369753 8494786 -IN 369856 8494801 -IN 369857 8494804 -IN 369754 8494809 -IN 5761.6406 5822.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES • 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 369858 46080559 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 370005 47741153 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370007 47741336 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370006 47741411 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 369950 7762 LOCHMERE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TER 369678 2769672 369677 2769673 369679 2769675 369680 2769677 369866 2773221 369861 2773222 369867 2773224 369865 2773225 369863 2773227 369868 2773228 369870 2773230 369869 2773232 369860 2773234 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5515 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE COST OF GOODS SOLD WANE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD VANE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392929 4/2312015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 947.39 369864 2773235 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 160.48 369859 2773236 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.16 369862 2773237 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10, 023.09 392930 412312015 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 51,521.70 CHEVROLET VEHICLES 00003133 369799 FJ314216 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 51, 521.70 392931 4/23/2015 102728 PRECISION LANDSCAPE AND TREE CO. 200.00 COMMUNITY GARDEN MULCH 00001801 369937 1827 1643.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 200.00 392932 412312015 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 247.00 BLADE SHARPENING 370008 273613 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 247.00 392933 4123/2015 104602 ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO. 229.86 WATER PUMP, GASKET 00005111 369731 S20995 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 229.86 392934 4/23/2015 117807 SAM'S CLUB 129.81 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 369965 006217 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 129.81 392935 4/23/2015 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 35.07 ' * * " " " " " "9 350 370012 SC FOOD 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 35.07 392936 4/2312015 127069 SEIDMAN, JANET 52.02 EVENT SUPPLIES 369664 REIMBURSE 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 52.02 392937 412312015 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 269.00 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004323 369732 803181399 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 807.00 ADOBEACROBAT 00004323 369732 B03181399 1160.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FINANCE 538.00 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004323 369732 803181399 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,614.00 392938 4/23/2015 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP • • 0 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 392938 4/23/2015 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 1,432.13 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 1,432.13 392939 4123/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 55.36 CONCESSION PRODUCT 35.71 33.58 54.83 22.84 22.84 54.24 73.08 352.48 392940 4/23/2015 132195 SMALL LOT MN 585.20 585.20 i CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 369636 81188705 5841.6215 Subledger Account Description Continued... EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 0 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 19 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY 370014 258421 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370015 259334 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370016 260261 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370017 260695 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370019 261591 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370018 261664 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370020 262506 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 370021 262991 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 369871 2366 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 392941 4/2312015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,749.83 369682 1272160 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.50 369756 1273861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,117.79 369873 1274441 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.88 369874 1274442 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,409.06 369878 1274443 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,760.80 369876 1274444 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 189.75 369875 1274445 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 90.66 369877 1274446 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,381.39 369879 1274447 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 886.68 369755 1274449 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,881.75 369872 1274450 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.00- 369757 9054677 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 50.50- 369880 9054679 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 54.00- 369758 9054680 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 336.00- 369881 9054682 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.00- 369759 9054683 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 51.00- 369882 9054685 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 128.00- 369760 9054686 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 286.00- 369884 9054688 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 542.00- 369761 9054689 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,889.00- 369883 9054691 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392941 4/23/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 18, 086.59 392942 4/23/2015 134700 SPOK INC. 107.40 PAGERS 369638 Y0319246D 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 107.40 392943 4/23/2015 136198 STAPF CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION INC. 24,390.00 LANDSCAPING /IRRIGATION 370013 APPL NO 1 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 24,390.00 392944 4/2312016 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 126.00 369683 5080 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 126.00 392945 4/23/2015 136196 STERLING EDUCATION SERVICES 309.00 REGISTRATION - CASSI MCMAYER 370022 15MN06169 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES 309.00 392946 4/23/2016 136191 SUN LIFE 142,000.00 EASEMENT - HAZELTONRD OOSA -317 369961 7101FRANCEAVE 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 142,000.00 392947 4/23/2016 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 95.00 GREENHOUSE POTS 369939 S210394 -IN 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 84.00- RETURN 369940 5210695 -CM 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 11.00 392946 4/23/2015 136197 THOMPSON, TRACIE L. 144.00 MODEL 370023 041715 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 392949 4123/2015 102798 THOMSON REUTERS -WEST 811.99 MAR 2015 SERVICES 369639 831576097 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 811.99 392950 4/2312016 136181 THOREEN, ADINE 84.08 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 369800 5617ABBOTTAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 84.08 392951 4/23/2015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY • • 0 392953 4123/2015 120595 T- MOBILE 33.87 ENG GPS DEVICE 369663 477067848 -4/15 1261.6188 33.87 392954 4/23/2015 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA OXYGEN 00001672 4/21/2015 13:27:08 10074373 29.08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary PRE EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS 369802 30412115 545.00 4123/2015 - 4/23/2015 392956 4123/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392951 412312015 9205308 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 128.57 THREADER, SCREWDRIVER 00001761 Continued... 9211097 53.65 369886 887728 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 49.20 369885 887729 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 63022 3,349.35 121.75 369887 887730 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 391.00 3,452.20 392958 4/23/2015 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 392952 4/23/2015 128347 TKO WINES INC. LEAK LOCATES 00001975 369737 5917 1,209.26 720.00 369685 1283 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 135.60 369684 1294 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 576.00 369762 876 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,440.00 369888 877 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 392953 4123/2015 120595 T- MOBILE 33.87 ENG GPS DEVICE 369663 477067848 -4/15 1261.6188 5913.6580 1556.6175 1646.6406 1301.6556 5842.5513 5862.5513 5913.6103 5400.1705 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DISTRIBUTION GOLF BALANCE SHEET 33.87 392954 4/23/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 29.08 OXYGEN 00001672 369801 10074373 29.08 392955 4/23/2015 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PC 545.00 PRE EMPLOYMENT SCREENINGS 369802 30412115 545.00 392956 4123/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 56.39 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001757 369941 9205308 128.57 THREADER, SCREWDRIVER 00001761 369736 9211097 184.96 392957 4/23/2015 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 269.25 369893 63022 121.75 369892 63024 391.00 392958 4/23/2015 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 1,209.26 LEAK LOCATES 00001975 369737 5917 1,209.26 392959 4123/2015 135954 WEINBERG & ERICKSON 117.06 TABLES & CHAIRS OBAL DUE 369966 1726 5913.6580 1556.6175 1646.6406 1301.6556 5842.5513 5862.5513 5913.6103 5400.1705 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DISTRIBUTION GOLF BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 392959 4/23/2015 135954 WEINBERG & ERICKSON 14.30 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 - 4123/2015 Doc No Inv No Account No 369968 1735 5400.1705 369967 1736 5400.1705 Subledger Account Description Continued... CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Page - 22 Business Unit GOLF BALANCE SHEET GOLF BALANCE SHEET 353.07 392960 4/23/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 63.00- 369763 702260 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,402.20 369687 7025221 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 641.80 369900 7026194 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.16 369899 7026195 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,049.44 369901 7026197 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,403.42 369898 7026198 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,453.02 392961 4/23/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,085.49 369688 1080306607 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,235.20 369765 1080311326 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,196.26 369903 1080311327 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,191.50 369764 1080311328 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,711.45 369902 1080311330 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 940.16 369771 1080311331 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,071.23 369773 1080311332 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 49.03 369768 1080311333 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,585.00 369770 1080311394 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 92.45 369769 1080311395 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.15 369767 1080311396 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,502.92 369772 1080311397 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 137.03 369766 1080311398 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,844.87 392962 4123/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 7,007.75 369905 1090387458 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 138.60 369692 1090387459 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,259.45 369689 1090387460 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,762.65 369691 1090387561 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 393.60 369690 1090387562 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 582.40 369904 1090387861 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,798.55 369774 1090388555 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 448.00 369776 1090388556 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.10 369775 1090388557 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 17,414.10 392965 4/23/2015 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 1,098.62 RESQPOD ITD'S 00003571 369962 2232746 1,098.62 657,940.64 Grand Total 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT, GENERAL Payment Instrument Totals Checks 585,466.27 A/PACH Payment 72,474.37 Total Payments 657,940.64 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/23/2015 — 4/23/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392962 4/23/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 392963 4/23/2016 101726 XCEL ENERGY 571.19 51- 4197645 -8 369742 451923621 1322.6165 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 483.82 51- 5619094 -8 369740 451945503 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,019.87 51- 5888961 -7 369741 451951711 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 17,809.05 51- 5605640 -1 369738 452498785 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 2,129.77 51- 6227619 -3 369739 452508663 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 24,013.70 392964 4123/2015 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 735.00 369906 13852 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 882.00 369907 13853 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 392965 4/23/2015 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 1,098.62 RESQPOD ITD'S 00003571 369962 2232746 1,098.62 657,940.64 Grand Total 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT, GENERAL Payment Instrument Totals Checks 585,466.27 A/PACH Payment 72,474.37 Total Payments 657,940.64 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 4/21/2015 13:27:13 Council Check Summary Page- 1 4/23/2015 - 4/23/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 156,677.20 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,539.26 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 30,251.08 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 53,402.39 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,177.02 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 596.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 24.69 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 15,098.53 05500 I C E AR E NA FU N D 8,969.60 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 2,073.78 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 170.48 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,863.86 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,286.13 05900 UTILITY FUND 48,251.96 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 29.66 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 161.10 09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 142,667.61 09234 GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT 1,307.09 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 11,702.50 09240 PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 105.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,585.70 Report Totals 657,940.64 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poli ies n_d procedures to �S ce D' for n S i i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1266 4/30/2015 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 12.00 370479 1882070 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 92.80 370478 1882071 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 76.80 370253 1882072 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 181.60 1267 4/30/2015 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 490.11 COFFEE 370027 1173744 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 490.11 1268 4/30/2015 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 112.00 CURRENT FEES 370074 143991 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 112.00 1269 4/30/2015 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 323.50 SANITARY SEWER ASSISTANCE 370540 23271331.00 -9 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 9,923.50 EXECUTIVE COURSE IMPROVEMENTS 370538 23271398.00 -3 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 10,203.00 LS #6 REPAIRS 370539 23271403.00 -2 10046.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS LS46 LIFT STATION 6 REHAB 20,450.00 1270 4/30/2015 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 523.00 370109 47881700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 489.30 370490 47966000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 227.10 370486 47966100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 470.10 370485 47966200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 36.55 370489 47966300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 97.95 370111 6534400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 275.13 370488 6536400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 202.61 370110 91871200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 220.24 370491 91902600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 36.71 370487 91902800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,578.69 1271 4130/2015 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 189.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 370306 WO- 111679 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1.39 BUSINESS CARD HOLDER 370307 WO- 111771 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 190.98 1272 4130/2015 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 89.55 OCE MAINTENANCE 370250 988438755 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 89.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1272 4/30/2015 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. Continued... 1273 4/30/2015 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 178.46 XCEL ENERGY BILLING 00001847 370371 6171 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 178.46 1274 4/30/2015 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 339.20 370492 174522 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 339.20 1275 4130/2015 104020 DALCO 501.98 WYPALL, CLEANERS, MOPS 00001785 370377 2872216 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 784.00 CHANGING STATIONS 00001454 370378 2873360 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,285.98 1276 413012015 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 501.65 370117 799579 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,086.20 370256 799581 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.00 370257 799582 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,645.35 370116 799583 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 146.40 370115 799584 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,422.60 1277 4/3012015 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 31,189.57 MAR 2015 LODGING TAX 370381 042415 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 31,189.57 1278 4/3012015 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 370543 2465650 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 1279 4/3012015 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING 940.50 FIELD PAINT 00001791 370404 106220 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 940.50 1280 4/30/2015 131734 HORWITZ INC. 57,506.35 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370343 APPL 7 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 57,506.35 1281 4/30/2015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 4.30 TUBING 00001673 370045 912266 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 0 0 is • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1281 4/3012015 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. Continued... 4.30 1282 4/3012015 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,146.04 370511 193742 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 813.93 370272 194229 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,959.97 1283 4/30/2015 101483 MENARDS 23.73 LAG BOLTS 00006316 370410 62588 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 147.96 SNOW FENCING 00001778 370048 82950 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 14.56 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001789 370049 83001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 193.63 HOSE, HOSE REEL CART 00008041 370411 83545 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 79.74 CONCRETE MIX, REBAR 00001829 370050 83614 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 459.82 1284 4/3012015 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 377.60 COMPOSTIBLE FOOD CONTAINERS 370217 36354 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 377.60 1285 4/30/2015 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 374.73 TIRE, FILTER, PLUG WIRES 00006314 370418 1002480 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 374.73 1286 4130/2016 106066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 720.00 REMOVE /INSTALL ICE VENT 370551 2143 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 727.50 REMOVE /INSTALL ICE VENT 370552 2144 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 1,447.50 1287 4/3012015 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 553.88 TIRE SERVICE 370427 210169516 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 553.88 1288 4/30/2015 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 446.65 ZAMBONI EQUIPMENT 370429 0057196 -IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 446.65 1289 4/30/2016 100974 RAYMOND E. HAEG PLUMBING 2,177.50 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIRS 00002372 370330 17352 5761.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,177.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1290 4130/2015 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. Continued... 288.50 BUSINESS CARDS 370056 85844 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 129.89 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 370332 85868 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 418.39 1291 4/30/2015 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 5,200.00 SCADA PROGRAMMING 370060 1494 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5,200.00 1292 4/30/2015 104672 SPRINT 33.14 370061 873184124 -149 1553.6168 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.52 370061 873184124 -149 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 49.07 370061 873184124 -149 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 78.78 370061 873184124 -149 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 99.42 370061 873184124 -149 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.68 370061 873184124 -149 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 184.95 370061 873184124 -149 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239.94 370061 873184124 -149 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 294.19 370061 873184124 -149 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 317.61 370061 873184124 -149 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 21.57 370061 873184124 -149 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 16.57 370061 873184124 -149 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 455.43 370061 873184124 -149 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 16.57 370061 873184124 -149 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,969.44 1293 4130/2015 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,006.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 370063 672357 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,006.00 1294 4/30/2015 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 267.77 LIGHTS 370064 5643146 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.77 1295 4/30/2015 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 4,235.22 BRIDGE REPAIRS 370559 002015000796 1346.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS SPECIAL PROJECTS 4,235.22 1296 4/30/2015 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 186.63 FILTERS 00006315 370448 E187517 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20.56 CABLE 370449 J197060 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS • • • 0 ! • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1296 4130/2016 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 207.19 1297 4/30/2015 119454 VINOCOPIA 132.00 370524 0121806 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 568.75 370297 0122403 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 41.25 370166 0122404 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 904.75 370167 0122405 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 132.00 370296 0122870 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,778.75 1298 4130/2015 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,159.29 CONCESSION PRODUCT 370451 42261562 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,159.29 1299 4/30/2015 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,020.88 370299 390853 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,104.17 370300 390992 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 637.20 370525 390998 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,762.25 392966 4/30/2015 100613 AAA 3,409.32 VEHICLE PLATES 370556 042415 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,409.32 392967 4130/2015 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 335.00 370557 042315 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 335.00 392968 413012015 124613 ABM ONSITE SERVICES -MIDWEST 2,836.62 JANITORIAL SERVICES 370358 7924951 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,836.62 392969 4130/2015 105075 ABSOLUTE RAIN INC. 887.70 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00002373 370304 33959 5765.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROMENADE EXPENSES 887.70 392970 4/3012015 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 75.03 DUCTWORK 00001820 370359 383802 450003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT MECH INSULATION 75.03 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,333.60 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register by GL 4130/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/3012015 CREDIT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 392971 4/30/2015 129458 ACME TOOLS GOLF BALLS 370240 Continued... 100.75 TARP 370360 3304721 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 422.99 DRILL 370361 3321378 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 309.86 TOOLS 370362 3323441 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 500.00 TOOLS 370363 3335331 1301.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page- 6 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,333.60 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 392972 4130/2016 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 222.00- CREDIT 370243 300010928 5440.5511 118.00 GOLF BALLS 370240 900359708 5440.5511 112.78 GOLF BALLS 370241 900437045 5440.5511 177.60 GOLF BALLS 370242 900459991 5440.5511 186.38 392973 4/30/2015 135342 ALLEGRA MIDWAY 87.48 SCHEDULING BOOK 370364 41869 5310.6513 87.48 392974 4/30/2015 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 12,400.00 CONFERENCE AV ROOM UPGRADES 370026 SYSINV15877DB 421130.6710 12,400.00 392975 4/30/2015 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 425.49 CONCESSION PRODUCT 370365 504140059 5730.5510 425.49 392976 4/30/2015 129829 ARCMATE MANUFACTURING CORP. 368.32 TRASH PICKERS 00001780 370028 INVO32200 1645.6406 368.32 392977 4/30/2015 136217 AREND, ANDREW 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370459 2015 2610.6103 500.00 392978 413012015 136206 ARSENEAULT, PAT 43.86 HRRC EVENT SUPPLIES 370073 REIMBURSE 1504.6218 43.86 392979 4/30/2015 121981 ARTEKA COMPANIES LLC 8,531.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370340 APPL 1 5550.1705 8,531.00 0 i 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page- 6 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET • is 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 7 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ICE MAINT TRAINING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 392979 4130/2015 121981 ARTEKA COMPANIES LLC Continued... 392980 4/30/2015 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 128.00 370108 3027128 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 957.00 370254 3027131 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 782.00 370483 3028327 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 96.00 370481 3028328 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,897.50 370480 3028329 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,848.07 370482 3028330 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,708.57 392981 4/30/2015 136208 AVILA, JUAN 262.85 SQUAD KEY FOB REPLACEMENT 370244 REIMBURSE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 262.85 392982 4/30/2015 136207 BALD EAGLE ERECTORS INC. 504.00 WELDING REPAIRS 370245 15030.1 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 504.00 392983 413012015 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 150.00 EP PERFORMANCE 5/07/15 370305 042215 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 392984 4/3012015 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 1,682.16 TEMPERED GLASS 370366 00101804 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.682.16 392985 413012015 129549 BEHLEN, NATE 28.03 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370075 042015 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 28.03 392986 4130/2015 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 360.00 PIZZA 370367 D2813319 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 216.00 PIZZA 370368 D2813330 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 144.00 PIZZA 370369 D2813342 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 720.00 392987 4/3012015 125139 BERNICK'S 171.60 370370 213449 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 171.60 is 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 7 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ICE MAINT TRAINING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392988 4/3012016 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE Continued... 58.96 HOSE / NOZZLE 370246 REIMBURSE 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 221.99 SAFE 370246 REIMBURSE 5410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 280.95 392989 4130/2015 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 135.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003574 370308 81763005 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.90 392990 4130/2015 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,396.50 370112 125985 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 260.43 370484 126207 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,656.93 392991 4/30/2015 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 670.95 GOLF CLUBS 370247 925884385 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 96.08 GOLF CLUB 370248 925893944 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 311.94- CREDIT 370249 925902210 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 455.09 392992 413012015 134674 CAPITAL CITY GLASS INC. 6,024.33 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370341 APPL 5 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 6,024.33 392993 4/30/2015 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 812.50 370114 562391 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,503.20 370113 563217 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,315.70 392994 4/30/2015 136219 CASSIDY, TIMOTHY D. 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370460 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 392996 413012016 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 451.68 370076 14561 -4/15 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 1,009.18 370076 14561 -4/15 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,118.65 370076 14561 -4/15 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 3,108.95 370076 14561 -4/15 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,133.60 370076 14561 -4/15 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 111.41 370076 14561 -4/15 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 444.99 370076 14561 -4/15 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS • • 0 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392995 4/30/2015 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 1,511.18 370076 14561 -4/15 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 9,630.82 370076 14561 -4/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,683.92 370076 14561 -4/15 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 180.49 370076 14561 -4/15 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 305.20 370076 14561 -4/15 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 408.50 370076 14561 -4/15 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 980.24 370076 14561 -4/15 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,369.76 370076 14561 -4/15 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,749.73 370076 14561 -4/15 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 26,198.30 392996 4/3012015 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 20,566.47 10437426 -9 (2 MO.) 370357 10437426 -4/15 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG &GROUNDS 4,657.23 9724639 -4 (2 MO.) 370356 9724639 -4/15 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 25,223.70 392997 4/3012015 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES INC. 5,185.48 370077 3027642 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 83.00 370029 3027952 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 5,268.48 392998 4/30/2015 123898 CENTURYLINK 60.19 952944 -6522 370030 6522 -4/15 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 60.19 392999 4/30/2015 102123 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES, THE 1,176.99 APPAREL 370251 PSI- 262709 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,178.99 393000 413012015 134994 CITY HOMES DESIGN & BUILD LLC 2,500.00 ED128205 ESCROW REFUND 370461 5612 ZENITH AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 393001 4130/2015 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 50,911.25 Q1 PUBLIC HEALTH CONTRACT 370031 10817 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 50,911.25 393002 4/30/2015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 87.12 00082198- 0200815001 370198 200815001 -4/15 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 20.57 00114667- 0210000012 370252 210000012 -4/15 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 4/3012015 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL 315.32 Page- 10 370374 3036304 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 316.40 DEHUMIDIFICATION UNIT REPAIR 370375 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 5511.6180 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393002 4/3012015 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS Continued... 1,082.82 107.69 393003 4/30/2015 393009 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 139.00 TRAINING CLASS 370309 IN00005861 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL HAND TOWELS 00001454 139.00 2872860 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 393004 4130/2015 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 177.88 370255 0138021923 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 177.88 393005 4/30/2016 3,000.00 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 370310 2014021 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 819.99 MAY 2015 MAINTENANCE 370199 MAY2015 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 819.99 393011 4130/2015 393006 4/30/2015 134058 DEHNE, JIM 120433 COMCAST 28.94 8772 10 614 0220686 370372 220686 -4/15 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 130.32 8772 10 614 0540372 370373 5403724/15 5552.6188 TELEPHONE SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 159.26 393007 4130/2015 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 250.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CERTIFICATION 370200 100-NOAH 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING SILVER 393008 4/3012015 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 315.32 WEST UNIT BOILER REPAIRS 370374 3036304 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 316.40 DEHUMIDIFICATION UNIT REPAIR 370375 3036308 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 451.10 WEST MUNTERS UNIT REPAIRS 370376 3038899 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,082.82 393009 4/30/2015 103020 DALCO ROOFING & SHEET METAL 221.10 HAND TOWELS 00001454 370201 2872860 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 221.10 393010 4/30/2015 130083 . DAY GROUP LLC 3,000.00 REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL 370310 2014021 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 3,000.00 393011 4130/2015 134058 DEHNE, JIM 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370462 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393011 4/30/2015 134058 DEHNE, JIM Continued... 2,765.41 500.00 393018 4/30/2015 105906 EGAN COMPANY 393012 4130/2015 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. L -61 73,951.09 156.93 DIE GRINDER, TORCH 00005190 370032 996325 1553.6556 2008B ARBITRAGE CALL 370542 156.93 5,000.00 2005AARBITRAGE CALL 370541 67391 393013 4/30/2015 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 393020 4/30/2015 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 107.40 23.85 650487671 370379 6504876714/15 5511.6188 23.85 393014 4/3012015 121103 DIRECTV 72.11 TV SERVICE 370311 25581049576 7411.6406 72.11 393015 4/30/2015 131298 DOMACE VINO LLC 402.00 370258 9293 5822.5513 402.00 393016 4130/2015 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 ED134066 ESCROW REFUND 370463 5916 CHOWEN AVE 1495.4109 2,500.00 393017 4/30/2015 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 921.79 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 370033 204788 5862.6122 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 370033 204788 5822.6122 921.81 EDINA LIQUOR INSERT 370033 204788 5842.6122 2,765.41 393018 4/30/2015 105906 EGAN COMPANY 73,951.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 370312 L -61 73,951.09 393019 4/30/2015 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,975.00 2008B ARBITRAGE CALL 370542 67390 5,000.00 2005AARBITRAGE CALL 370541 67391 7,975.00 393020 4/30/2015 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 107.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE 370380 042115 107.40 08061.1705.30 3301.6103 3101.6103 1301.6201 TOOLS 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 11 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING FRANCE AVE LIGHTING &CONDUIT PIR DS REVENUES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393020 4/30/2015 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL Continued... 393021 4/3012015 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 650.00 VOLUTE 00001797 370034 0055167 -IN 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 650.00 393022 4/30/2015 130254 ELLIOTT, STEVE 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370464 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 393023 4/30/2015 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 57.15 CAMSHAFT SENSORS 370035 69- 175272 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.90 PARTS 370382 69- 175742 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 238.05 393024 4/30/2015 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 540.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 370465 042215 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 540.00 393025 4/30/2015 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 136.11 COFFEE 370202 61659860 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 136.11 393026 413012015 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 639.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 370383 3887654 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 639.00 393027 4/30/2015 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 19.27 BOLTS 00001762 370203 MNSTU59984 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 19.27 393028 4/3012015 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,994.42 CS PARTS 00001671 370036 0131583 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,874.96 METERS 00001843 370037 0131595 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 5,869.38 393029 4/30/2015 135048 FIELDTURF USA INC. 18,977.04 TURF - PAMELA PARK 370384 APPL 003 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF 18,977.04 393030 4130/2015 119211 FIRSTLAB • 0 • 0 ACCT 05842 -01 0 1006825820 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 393033 CITY OF EDINA 370387 1006848577 136212 FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE Council Check Register by GL 225.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 393037 413012015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 225.00 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393030 4130/2015 119211 FIRSTLAB Continued... 126.95 PRE EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 370038 FL00118357 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 12.08 126.95 393035 393031 4/3012015 131188 FIRST -SHRED 1020578194 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 13 Business Unit EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 21.80 SHREDDING 370313 144755 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.80 370314 146540 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 43.60 393032 4/3012015 136215 FOKKEN, KYLE 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370466 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5919.6104 421260.6710 15.00 ACCT 05842 -01 500.00 1006825820 5422.6201 393033 4/30/2015 370387 1006848577 136212 FOX VALLEY TECHNICAL COLLEGE 30.00 225.00 TRAINING - LYNN OLSON 370315 40034 393037 413012015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 225.00 393034 4130/2015 370204 11689709 136205 FREEMAN, BRANDON 870.10 12.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370078 042015 393038 4/30/2015 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 12.08 393035 4/30/2015 370205 1020578194 104980 FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 481.90 9,571.50 GPS UNIT & SOFTWARE 00002641 370385 134907 393039 4/30/2015 100773 GENERAL PARTS LLC 9,571.50 393036 4/3012015 370040 1480592 100764 G & K SERVICES 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5919.6104 421260.6710 15.00 ACCT 05842 -01 370386 1006825820 5422.6201 15.00 SHOP RAGS 370387 1006848577 5422.6201 30.00 393037 413012015 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 870.10 APPAREL 370204 11689709 5440.5511 870.10 393038 4/30/2015 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 481.90 PARK CLEAN UP BAGS 00001781 370205 1020578194 1645.6406 481.90 393039 4/30/2015 100773 GENERAL PARTS LLC 275.82 FILTERS 00001688 370040 1480592 1646.6406 275.82 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 18.35 CITY OF EDINA 393044 4/3012015 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES Council Check Register by GL 159.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 159.00 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393039 4/30/2015 156.14 100773 GENERAL PARTS LLC 370207 9708641668 Continued... 393040 4/30/2015 514.05 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 370206 9716375002 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,805.00 UNIFORM PARKAS 370388 88861 5511.6201 LAUNDRY SAFETY EQUIPMENT 54.00 SKATE SHARPENING 370389 89036 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,859.00 CABLE TIES, FILTERS, OIL 00002201 370395 9717712955 5720.6406 393041 4/30/2015 1,081.43 112776 GEORGE F. COOK CONSTRUCTION CO. 393046 4/3012015 5,758.90 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370342 APPL4 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5,758.90 370494 180756 5822.5513 393042 4/30/2015 2,880.50 103185 GERTENS 370259 180758 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 156.00 VEGETATION FOR RETAINING WALL00001837 370390 344351/1 1344.6577 LUMBER COST OF GOODS SOLD VNNE 182.00 JUNIPERS 00001887 370391 344701/1 1344.6577 LUMBER 11.48 TOPSOIL 00001888 370316 344715/1 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 349.48 393043 4/3012015 102540 GOERGEN, DAVID 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 14 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 18.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370392 042015 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 393047 4/3012015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,146.36 LED COBRA HEADS 00001572 370396 978212297 1322.6530 • Is POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 40 18.35 393044 4/3012015 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 159.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 370393 947 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 159.00 393045 4/30/2015 101103 GRAINGER 156.14 GEO SYSTEM FILTERS 00001768 370207 9708641668 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 514.05 CABLE TIES 00001817 370206 9716375002 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.45 SAFETY VESTS 00005231 370041 9716375010 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 233.75 EXTENSION POLE, FILTERS 00002200 370394 9717712948 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 144.04 CABLE TIES, FILTERS, OIL 00002201 370395 9717712955 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,081.43 393046 4/3012015 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 268.50 370494 180756 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 2,880.50 370259 180758 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 162.25 370493 180815 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VNNE 393047 4/3012015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,146.36 LED COBRA HEADS 00001572 370396 978212297 1322.6530 • Is POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 40 • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393047 4/30/2015 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. Continued... 185.96 LIGHT FIXTURES 00001844 370208 978394995 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1.332.32 393048 4130/2015 124022 GREEN LIGHTS RECYCLING INC. 131.32 RECYCLE LIGHTS 00006415 370397 15 -2106 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 131.32 393049 4/30/2015 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 136.20 GOLF BALLS, SPIKES 370209 54123 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 136.20 393050 4/3012015 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 558.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 370467 042215 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 558.00 393051 4/3012015 100008 GRUBE, MIKE 774.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 370468 042215 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 774.00 393052 4130/2015 100788 H &L MESABI 3,289.60 PLOW BLADES 00005074 370042 93217 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,610.60 PLOW EDGES 00005075 370043 93220 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,170.40 SNOW PLOW BLADES 00005075 370398 93265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,233.60 SNOW PLOW BLADES 00005074 370399 93266 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15, 304.20 393053 4/30/2015 133935 HALF PINT HORSE FOUNDATION 100.00 EP PERFORMANCE 5/14/15 370317 042215 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 393054 4/30/2015 130116 HARRIS CONTRACTING COMPANY 1,534.53 HEATING PARTS 370400 160002701 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,534.53 393055 4/3012015 136223 HEIGHTS NE WELDING 3,242.00 ROAD MILLING SIDE PLATE 00005226 370401 26621 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,242.00 393056 4/30/2015 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 288.00 EMT REFRESHER 370210 39128 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 4/30/2015 5862.5514 100417 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING • is 505.46 CHLORINE, ACID 00002190 Council Check Register by GL 150327017 505.46 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 393062 4/3012015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393056 4/30/2015 311.08 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER Continued... 393063 288.00 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 393057 4130/2015 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY COFFEE FOR WELLNESS FAIR 370544 042315 16.00 SPEAKER BARS 00004332 370044 55765273 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 393064 112.00 SPEAKER BARS 00004332 370044 55765273 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.00 250.00 370119 393058 4/30/2015 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 370495 28326 511.86 FLOOR CARE PRODUCTS 00002197 370402 601575490 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 28346 244.29 FOAM SOAP 00002199 370403 601577099 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 756.15 393059 4/30/2015 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 16 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE ASSESSING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,611.00 370260 758118 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 574.00 370261 758157 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2.007.75 370118 758483 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 393060 4130/2015 108658 HOME DEPOT 259.36 PERMIT ED136800 REFUND 370211 4812 HIBISCUS 1495.4111 AVE 393061 4/30/2015 5862.5514 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING • is 505.46 CHLORINE, ACID 00002190 370405 150327017 505.46 393062 4/3012015 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 311.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370318 042215 311.08 393063 4/30/2015 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 32.08 COFFEE FOR WELLNESS FAIR 370544 042315 32.08 393064 4/30/2015 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 250.00 370119 28135 150.00 370495 28326 765.00 370262 28346 1,165.00 • 5720.6545 1644.6107 1628.6406 BUILDING PERMITS CHEMICALS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS TREES & MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING • is • 4130/2015 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 37.00 SHIRT 370213 61973 Council Check Register by GL 37.00 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 393069 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393064 4/30/2015 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY EDINA SPORTS DOME Continued... 393065 4/30/2015 5550.1705 119808 INTEGRA 6,751.99 27.74 ISP BUNDLE 370319 12912050 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 393070 27.74 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 393066 4/30/2015 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 104.43 13.34 370320 370079 033115 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.47 666.98 370079 033115 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71364905 76.09 370079 033115 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND 257.15 370079 033115 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 393071 375.05 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 393067 4/30/2015 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 406.66 4,154.20 370131 370120 2349425 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,965.30 81.16 370121 2349456 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5139032 1,180.25 370123 2349457 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 21.50 370133 370122 2349458 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3,666.02 370263 2349466 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 143.00 370212 2356907 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3.33- 370124 2360805 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 160.00- 370125 2360807 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 393068 4130/2015 136082 JOFIT LLC 37.00 SHIRT 370213 61973 5440.5511 37.00 393069 4/30/2015 135045 JOHN A. DALSIN & SON INC. 6,751.99 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370344 APPL 5 5550.1705 6,751.99 393070 4/30/2015 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 104.43 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001818 370320 71326882 1642.6406 666.98 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00001827 370406 71364905 1643.6180 771.41 393071 4/30/2015 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 406.66 370131 5139028 5842.5512 81.16 370134 5139032 5822.5512 1,987.53 370133 5139033 5822.5512 • 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page- 17 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY PARKADMIN. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT, GENERAL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date 393071 4130/2015 393072 4130/2015 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 2,912.38 5,396.81 94.23 621.76 729.97 669.00 1.16 1,378.94 1,148.67 51.16 1.16 974.66 235.73 1,304.50 1,338.04 2,156.31 1,794.36 2,600.04 2,415.78 2,002.66 409.79 7,320.52 3,353.71 1,794.20 876.55 62.82 2,210.48 212.34 124.87 - 240.32- 37.23- 39.45- 37.23- 33.16- 46,032.82 129918 JOHNSON, BRIAN 35.00 FLAK VEST 370126 5139034 370130 5139038 370129 5139039 370128 5139041 370127 5139043 370132 5139045 370269 5144122 370510 5144123 370499 5144124 370509 5144125 370265 5144126 370498 5144127 370508 5144128 370497 5144129 370505 5144131 370502 5144132 370506 5144133 370503 5144134 370496 5144135 370504 5144136 370507 5144137 370270 5144138 370268 5144139 370500 5144140 370267 5144141 370266 5144142 370501 5144143 370264 5144144 370271 521783 370135 521784 370137 522855 370138 522856 370139 522857 370136 523038 370321 042115 5822.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5512 5862.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 7414.6406 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 4128/2015 10:21:29 Page - 18 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PUBLIC PROGRAMS 0 is 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393073 4/30/2015 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Continued... 396.40 THERMOSTATS 00001745 370407 101262 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 336.09 HEATING PARTS 00001769 370214 101793 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 288.75 IN FLOOR HEATING 00001769 370215 102597 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,021.24 393074 4/30/2015 136126 KADERLIK, NATE 26.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370080 042015 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 26.16 393075 4/30/2015 108679 KELLEHER CONSTRUCTION 5,032.19 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370345 APPL7 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 5,032.19 393076 4/30/2015 115192 KNUDSON, DEBBIE 180.00 BRAEMAR GOLF ACADEMY 370469 042215 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 180.00 393077 413012015 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC. 20.34 VALVE 00001894 370322 SI- 330473 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20.34 393078 4/30/2015 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 66.50 UNIFORM 370323 SIN2714874 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,087.32 UNIFORMS 370324 SIN2722861 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,153.82 393079 4/3012015 124611 LARSCO INC. 2,290.48 PUMPS 00001713 370046 3361 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 2,290.48 393080 4130/2015 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 46.00 HOME WORKERS COMP CLAIMS 370470 1ST QTR 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 46.00 393081 4/30/2015 135661 LEAP MANUFACTURING LLC 1,763.64 ASPHALT BINDER 370408 246 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,763.64 393082 4/30/2015 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM 68.35 STORAGE BOXES 370216 REIMBURSE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393082 4/30/2015 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM Continued... 68.35 393083 4130/2015 102464 LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MINNESOTA INC. 136.25 LIGHTING 00001721 370545 INV64693 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS 136.25 393084 4/30/2015 136213 LIMBECK, ANNA 128.13 UNIFORM PURCHASE 370325 042215 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 128.13 393085 4130/2015 106726 LINDMAN, DAVID 1,357.87 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 370081 042015 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,357.87 393086 4/30/2016 136214 LOCKER GUY, THE 5,465.00 LOCKERS 370346 15003 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5,465.00 393087 4/3012015 100858 LOGIS 288.75 IT CONSULTING 370548 38939 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,937.50 IT CONSULTING 370546 39905 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 374.02 FIBER CABLES 370547 40032 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,600.27 393088 413012016 113213 M G MCGRATH INC. 2,827.00 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370348 APPL 2 REVISED 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3,045.70 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370347 APPL 3 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5,872.70 393089 4130/2015 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 11,364.24 DIESEL FUEL 00005230 370047 409654 1553.6581 GASOLINE 11, 364.24 393090 4/3012015 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 118.95 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 370409 1459 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 118.95 393091 4/30/2015 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC. 54.00 HANDTIGHT NUTS FOR OXYGEN 00003649 370326 11145301 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 54.00 • • 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 20 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA CONCESSIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 0 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page- 21 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS INSPECTIONS 0 • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393091 413012015 122554 MATHESON TRI -GAS INC Continued... 393092 4130/2015 101987 MENARDS 79.83 MULCH, BLEACH, SOAP 00002196 370412 66577 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 52.52 GLOVES, MULCH 00002198 370413 66651 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 132.35 393093 4/3012015 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 3,700.00 TEMPORARY FENCING 370349 164146 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 3,700.00 393094 4/30/2015 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,000.00 WATER /SEWER UPGRADE 00002661 370051 34921 05551.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 4,925.00 WATER /SEWER UPGRADE 00002661 370051 34921 03487.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,192.50 WATER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001845 370414 34924 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,325.00 REPLACE SERVICE LINE 00001846 370415 34925 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9,442.50 393096 4130/2015 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 CLASS B LICENSE 370549 RENEWAL 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 393096 413012016 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 CLASS B LICENSE 370550 RENEWAL 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 393097 4/3012015 118144 MINNESOTA PREMIER PUBLICATIONS 1,016.00 ART CENTER ADS 370218 157154 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,016.00 393098 4/30/2015 101878 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL 85.00 SUBSCRIPTION - BOB WILSON 370416 0069792 -2015 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 85.00 393099 4/3012016 132597 MIXMI BRANDS INC. 96.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 370417 2385 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 96.00 393100 4/3012015 134703 MJL HOMES LLC 2,500.00 ED136808 ESCROW REFUND 370471 6212 EWING AVE 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page- 21 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET Arden Park D Reconstruction Arden Park D Reconstruction DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 54,668.23 EDINASPORTSDOME 370350 APPLE CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 104350 NIKE USA INC. 1,838.52 APPAREL 370220 970458584 1,838.52 Council Check Register by GL 393109 4/3012015 Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 -- 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393100 4/30/2015 134703 MJL HOMES LLC Continued... 393101 4130/2015 136224 MORRISSETTE, GREG 120.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 370472 6017 CODE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 120.00 393102 413012015 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 7,950.25 PORTABLE MOBILE RADIOS 00003151 370052 13059734 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 7,950.25 393103 413012015 130463 NATIONAL CINEMEDIA LLC 107.15 370420 INV- 053639 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 419.93 AMC THEATER TRAILERS 370419 INV- 054176 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 419.94 AMC THEATER TRAILERS 370419 INV - 054176 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 419.94 AMC THEATER TRAILERS 370419 INV - 054176 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,366.96 393104 4/30/2015 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 299.00 EDINAART CENTER ADS 370219 726202 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 299.00 393105 4130/2015 129202 NELSON, JUDD 1,000.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370473 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 1,000.00 393106 4130/2015 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 177.50 370275 99378 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 764.00 370512 99425 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,060.00 370273 99431 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 770.50 370274 99434 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 393107 4/30/2015 134457 NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC. 54,668.23 EDINASPORTSDOME 370350 APPLE 54,668.23 393108 4/30/2015 104350 NIKE USA INC. 1,838.52 APPAREL 370220 970458584 1,838.52 393109 4/3012015 126728 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC. • 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 0 • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393109 4/30/2015 126728 NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC. Continued... 2,249.22 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370351 1414800002 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 2,249.22 393110 4/30/2015 136211 OAS, KAYLA 171.65 CANCELED BIRTHDAY PARTY 370327 REFUND 5701.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 171.65 393111 4/30/2015 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 282.50 LANGUAGE LINE BOOKING 370053 7/31/14- 3/31/15 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 282.50 393112 4130/2015 105612 OFFICE TEAM 398.25 370329 42735456 7410.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 405.00 PART TIME TEMP 370328 42814275 7410.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 803.25 393113 4130/2015 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 40.10 STRAP RATCHETS 00001793 370054 557945 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 122.00 PLAYGROUND CHAIN 00001798 370221 558045 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 162.10 393114 4/30/2015 101659 ORKIN 142.22 PEST CONTROL 370055 101900386 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 142.22 393115 4/30/2015 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 588.00 PAINT GUNS 00001740 370421 31812 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS 586.00 393116 4/3012015 118899 PARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 51,184.84 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370352 APPL 02 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 51,184.84 393117 4130/2015 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,545.46 370276 8495811 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 687.50 370141 8495819 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 978.76 370140 8495824 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.25 370142 8495848 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,412.97 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4128/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/3012015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393118 4/30/2015 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Continued... 116.72 370422 36626029 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 453.29 370423 36626053 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 493.07 370222 47741412 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 333.50 370277 48385755 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,396.58 393119 4130/2015 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS .09 370143 2773220 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 389.07 370144 2773223 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .09 370147 2773226 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 699.71 370145 2773231 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.16 370146 2773233 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 950.99 370520 2776665 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .87 370516 2776666 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 135.62 370513 2776667 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 204.64 370519 2776668 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.32 370515 2776669 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 216.52 370521 2776670 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.16 370280 2776671 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 105.16 370282 2776672 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,105.24 370517 2776674 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,177.53 370514 2776675 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,822.38 370518 2776676 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,156.05 370283 2776677 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 122.32 370278 2776678 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,199.42 370279 2776679 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,095.94 370281 2776680 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16,458.28 393120 4130/2015 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 204.80 370522 23988 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 204.80 393121 4/3012015 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 187.18 ELECTRIC PARTS 00005252 370425 1- 286184 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 197.38 DRUMS 00005253 370424 1- 286382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 384.56 393122 4/30/2015 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 370426 329630 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 0 is 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 -- 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393122 4/3012015 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. Continued... 2,223.86 393123 4130/2015 136209 POLAR BUILDERS INC. 76.60 ED138943 PERMIT REFUND 370223 5739 LONG BRAKE 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS TR 76.60 393124 4130/2015 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 134.32 VETERANS MEMORIAL POSTAGE 370224 042215 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 134.32 393125 4/30/2015 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 41.71 622833 WATER 370428 622833 -03 -15 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 41.71 393126 4/30/2015 135046 PRESTIGE DRYWALL 655.50 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370353 APPL 5 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 655.50 393127 4/30/2015 105707 RAINBOW INC. 1,477.25 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370354 APPL4 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 1,477.25 393128 4130/2015 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 175.00 SAFETY BOOTS 370430 2680000001344 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 127.49 SAFETY BOOTS 370430 2680000001344 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 302.49 393129 4/30/2015 134496 REFINED LLC 2,500.00 ED129017 ESCROW REFUND 370474 7412 COVENTRY 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS WAY 2,500.00 393130 4/3012015 125936 REINDERS INC. 2,365.13 FERTILIZER 00002375 370331 3030560 -00 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,365.13 393131 413012015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 136.80 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 370333 00314240 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 906.00 SOFTENER SALT 370431 00314595 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393131 4130/2015 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. Continued... 1,042.80 393132 4130/2015 121646 ROFIDAL, KENNA 300.00 EXPLORER CONFERENCE 370225 042215 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 300.00 393133 4/30/2015 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO INC 207.29 PIVOT PIN, NUT 370432 IA00209 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.29 393134 4/3012015 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 370335 INV -20596 -2015 1470.6160 DATAPROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 772.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 370334 INV -20750 -2015 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 822.00 393135 4/30/2015 103278 SCHATTAUER, JIM 200.00 EP PERFORMANCE 5/21/15 370336 042215 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 393136 4/30/2015 100995 SEH 2,848.56 70TH ST LANDSCAPING 370558 295446 01241.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION A -241 WEST 70TH LANDSCAPING 16,010.23 ARDEN PARK BID DOCS 370553 295843 01412.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEN VIEWADDITION NHOOD RECON 18, 858.79 393137 4/30/2015 127069 SEIDMAN, JANET 58.03 HRRC EVENT SUPPLIES 370057 042115 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 58.03 393138 4/30/2015 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 495.00 APR 2015 FEES 370475 008816 -4/15 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 495.00 393139 4/3012015 136216 SIERRALTA, ALONSO 500.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370476 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLICART 500.00 393140 4130/2015 120784 SIGN PRO 47.64 DISPLAY SIGNS 370433 8990 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 95.28 DISPLAY SIGNS 370433 8990 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 119.08 DISPLAY SIGNS 370433 8990 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING • • • • • • R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393140 4/30/2015 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 262.00 393141 4/30/2015 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 57.38 HOT DOG BUNS 370434 263250 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 57.38 393142 4/30/2015 132195 SMALL LOT MN 486.15 370148 2387 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 486.15 393143 4/3012015 136218 SNYDER, CRAIG 1,000.00 PUBLIC ART EDINA 370477 2015 2610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 1,000.00 393144 4/30/2015 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTERY 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 370058 1215C 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 240.47 CARPET CLEANING 370059 1216C 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 480.94 393145 4/30/2015 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 14.00- 370155 0016128 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.00- 370162 0016227 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.50 370150 1273880 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 414.42 370149 1274440 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 598.50 370151 1275807 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,888.00 370154 1275808 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .75 370160 1276880 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,240.93 370286 1276881 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 665.25 370159 1276883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .75 370284 1276885 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .75 370285 1276886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,868.75 370287 1276887 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 771.12 370161 1276888 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,473.30 370523 1276889 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,256.50 370158 1276890 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,439.48 370153 1276891 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,453.00 370152 1276892 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,692.25 370156 1276893 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.75 370157 1276894 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 64.00- 370291 9054615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 136222 STERNBERG ELECTRIC SERVICE CITY OF EDINA 17,809.99 Council Check Register by GL 370437 14203 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 17,809.99 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 393152 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393145 4/30/2015 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005146 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 10131586 1553.6583 Continued... EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.50- TIRE DISPOSAL 00005155 370288 9054678 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 252.00- 146.54 370293 9054681 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 45.00- 370290 9054684 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 240.00- 370292 9054687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,260.00- 370289 9054690 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 23,890.50 • 393146 4130/2015 130640 SPERIDES REINERS ARCHITECTS INC. 1,400.00 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE REMODEL 370436 30572 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 5,361.05 EXTERIOR DESIGN 370435 30573 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 6,761.05 393147 4/30/2015 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 374.73 DIVOT TOOLS 370226 0000749478 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 374.73 393148 4/30/2015 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY - DAVIDSON 2,519.93 MOTORCYCLE BUILD UP 370227 693863 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,519.93 393149 413012015 134925 STACON 1,740.59 LEVELTRANSDUCERS 00001810 370062 IND0077123 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,740.59 393150 4/30/2015 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 205.75 370295 5164 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 210.00 370294 5165 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 28 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF BALANCE SHEET GOLF BALANCE SHEET GOLF ADMINISTRATION POLICE EQUIPMENT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 393151 413012015 136222 STERNBERG ELECTRIC SERVICE 17,809.99 LIGHT FIXTURE FOR MEMORIAL 00002375 370437 14203 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 17,809.99 393152 4/30/2015 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 59.50 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005146 370438 10131586 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.50 TIRE DISPOSAL 00005155 370439 10132050 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.54 TIRE 00005193 370440 10132133 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 255.54 393153 413012015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. • • • 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 — 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 393153 4/3012015 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. Continued... 803.61 FERTILIZER 00006320 370441 10863 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 803.61 393154 4/3012015 130355 SUTTON & ASSOCIATES INC. 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 29 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 9,200.00 FPW CIVIC PROGRAM 370442 2469 9234.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET CITY COUNCIL 600.00 370165 1300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 600.00 393161 4/30/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 155.00 ARGON /CO2LEASE 370446 70001666 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 155.00 393162 4/30/2016 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 9,200.00 393155 4/3012015 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 52.10 RAKE GRIPS 00006312 370443 S210547 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 420.59 TRASH CANS, BRACKETS 00006319 370444 5211009 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 120.00- TURFBUCKS CREDIT 370445 TURFBUC -PP 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 352.69 393156 4/30/2015 118072 THOMPSON, PAUL 131.40 EEC EVENT SUPPLIES 370337 040915 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 131.40 393157 4/3012015 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 279.75 370228 888418 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 130.55 370163 889132 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 4,873.52 370164 889133 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5,283.82 393168 4/30/2015 124968 THURNBECK STEEL FABRICATION INC. 6.65 EDINA SPORTS DOME 370355 APPL2 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 6.65 393159 4/3012015 136225 TIN FISH 3,739.98 VOLUNTEER RECEPTION 370561 042815 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 3,739.98 393160 4/30/2015 128347 TKO WINES INC. MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET CITY COUNCIL 600.00 370165 1300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 600.00 393161 4/30/2015 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 155.00 ARGON /CO2LEASE 370446 70001666 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 155.00 393162 4/30/2016 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393162 4/30/2015 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE Continued... 3,875.00 CHAIN -LINK FENCE INSTALLATION 370447 3041340 47085.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PK BASEBALL FIELD 3,875.00 393163 4/30/2015 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 337.40 GRASS SEED 00001814 370229 34458 1643.6547 SEED GENERALTURF CARE 337.40 393164 4/30/2015 134220 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 1,084.90 DEER MANAGEMENT 370082 3001503610 1509.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL 5,018.21 DEER MANAGEMENT 370083 3001606888 1509.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEER CONTROL 6,103.11 393165 4/30/2015 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC SERVICE INC. 675.90 FIELD PAINT, LINERS, RAKES 00001815 370450 1501 - 003305 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 369.88 TENNIS NETS, STRAPS 00001883 370230 1501- 003352 1642.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,045.78 393166 4/30/2015 100668 URS CORPORATION 20,291.82 PROMENADE - PHASE 4 370554 6222614 01251.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -251 PROMENADE IV H2O FEATURE 20,291.82 393167 4/30/2015 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 141.54 CAN LINERS 00001771 370065 344713 -01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 98.63 CAN LINERS 00001771 370066 344954 -01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 135.38 CAN LINERS, UTENSILS 370338 345671 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 640.45 LIQUOR BAGS 370338 345671 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 347.63 LIQUOR BAGS 370231 345674 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 1,363.63 393168 4/30/2015 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 541.35 WIRE 00001774 370232 9223108 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 493.16 SCOREBOARD POWER 00001795 370233 9231796 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 141.39 MAESTRO WIRELESS SAMPLE KIT 00001784 370235 9233089 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 34.45 POWER OUTLETS 00001795 370234 9233168 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,210.35 393169 4/30/2015 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES INC. 343.00 370298 63036 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 343.00 • 0 0 0 ! i R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 31 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/3012015 - 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393170 4130/2015 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS Continued... 84.93 BRATS 370452 84836 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 84.93 393171 4/30/2015 101932 VOTH, BART 19.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 370560 042715 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION 19.00 393172 413012015 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 46.65 PLANTS 370236 042215 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 46.65 393173 4/3012015 131542 WAGNER, JOSH 41.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 370453 042015 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 41.94 393174 4/30/2015 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 172.29 DUMPSTER 370237 7125537 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 60.05 370454 9230 1481.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 78.90 370454 9230 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 96.06 370454 9230 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 162.57 370454 9230 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 199.88 370454 9230 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 299.86 370454 9230 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 474.24 370454 9230 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 474.25 370454 9230 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 62.75 370454 9230 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 74.39 370454 9230 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 301.06 370454 9230 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 391.38 370454 9230 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 753.24 370454 9230 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,096.26 370454 9230 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 82.14 370454 9230 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 130.95 370454 9230 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 4,910.27 393175 4/3012015 136210 WEATHER APPAREL COMPANY LLC, THE 483.30 APPAREL 00006002 370238 A31127 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 483.30 393176 4/30/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/2812015 10:21:29 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 -- 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 393176 4130/2015 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 157.00 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 370168 702072DUE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,920.00 370531 7023586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 283.48 370530 7027173 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20.91 370526 7027174 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 125.16 370527 7027175 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,343.76 370528 7027177 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,352.08 370301 7027178 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 135.11 370529 7027259 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 517.80 370532 7027489 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,855.30 393177 4/30/2015 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 989.71 370169 1080311329 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 186.14 370170 1080314243 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,475.53 370172 1080314274 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,290.05 370171 1080314276 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 942.34 370173 1080314277 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 894.30 370533 1080314278 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 186.14 370175 1080314280 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 902.79 370174 1080314281 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,549.23 370176 1080314283 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 87.35- 370177 2080052014 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17,328.88 393178 4/30/2015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 2,481.10 370302 1090391152 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 196.80 370178 1090391153 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,494.45 370184 1090391154 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,574.02 370179 1090391155 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 370180 1090391156 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 150.00 370239 1090391157 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,887.00 370303 1090391397 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,876.60 370181 1090392270 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 370183 1090392291 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 46.20 370182 1090392292 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,021.90 370534 1090394684 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 69.30 370535 1090394685 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,143.05 370536 1090394686 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 23.10 370537 1090394687 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 16,455.52 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 33 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 993,948.23 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals CONSULTING DESIGN BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Checks 0 A/PACH Payment 148,186.84 Total Payments 9 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/30/2015 -- 4/30/2015 Check # Date Amount. Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 393178 413012015 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 393179 4/30/2015 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 33,155.50 VALLEY VIEW RD FINAL DESIGN 370555 4- 01686 -590 01377.1705.20 33,155.50 393180 4/30/2015 101726 XCEL ENERGY 46.40 51- 5276505 -8 370068 453031668 1330.6185 14.58 51- 0010613106 -9 370069 453112938 1321.6185 108.43 51- 0010025256 -3 370067 453117589 1322.6185 171.41 393181 4/30/2015 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 1,617.25 VEHICLE REPAIRS 370070 13567 1553.6180 1,375.20 VEHICLE REPAIRS 370071 13608 1553.6180 1,580.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 370072 13670 1553.6180 4,572.45 393182 4/30/2015 130178 ZARRIN, SARAH 177.88 EEC EVENT SUPPLIES 370339 041015 1122.6103 177.88 393183 4/30/2015 101091 ZIEGLER INC 419.84- CREDIT 370455 PR000140544 1553.6530 30.45- CREDIT 370457 PR000141578 1553.6530 494.68 GENERATOR REPAIRS 370458 SW050234876 1553.6180 322.04 MACHINE REPAIR 370456 SW140143779 1553.6180 366.43 0 4/28/2015 10:21:29 Page - 33 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... 993,948.23 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals CONSULTING DESIGN BA -377 VALLEY VIEW RD LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Checks 845,761.39 A/PACH Payment 148,186.84 Total Payments 993,948.23 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 4/30/2015 - 4/30/2015 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 194,592.56 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 7,950.25 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 5,000.00 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 5,000.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,975.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 187,154.86 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 24,491.43 04500 CANDO FUND 75.03 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,641.24 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 74.39 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 329.48 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 21,193.08 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 35,976.99 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 224,243.24 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 11,967.86 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 7,114.25 05800 LIQUOR FUND 199,146.66 05900 UTILITY FUND 42,317.78 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 11,549.46 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 954.67 09234 GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT 9,200.00 Report Totals 993,948.23 0 0 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies 7,nd procedures dated ° S I 4/28/2015 10:21:36 Page - 1 s To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: May 6, 2015 Subject: Traffic Sign Installation and Maintenance Policy o e- tit U) 0 •'��nRPOA A7�'O • Agenda Item #: IV. C. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve staffs recommendations for the Traffic Sign Installation and Maintenance Policy. Information / Background: Language adopted in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) requires all agencies that maintain roadways open to public travel to adopt a sign maintenance program designed to maintain traffic sign retroreflectivity at or above specific levels. The City of Edina is required to comply with these new MN MUTCD requirements. Implementation of these requirements began on June 13, 2014; up until this time. Traffic signs have always been required to be retroreflective; however, no maximum values had previously been required. A staff team made up of the Directors of Engineering and Public Works, the transportation planner, traffic safety specialist and traffic safety coordinator recommends the following policy for installing and maintaining traffic signs in City right -of -way. City of Edina: Traffic Sign Installation and Maintenance Policy I. Purpose and Goal The goal of this policy is to improve public safety on the City's streets and prioritize the City's limited resources to install, maintain, and replace traffic signs within the City's right -of -way. The purpose of this policy includes: A. To establish uniform installation and maintenance of traffic signs installed on City right - of -way. B. To comply with Federal and State requirements. C. To recognize the Traffic Safety Committee as the authority to approve of traffic sign installation or removal as covered by this policy. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 • This policy recognizes the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MN MUTCD) as the standard for all traffic control devices on public roads in the state of Minnesota. All traffic signs /devices installed on City right -of -way shall conform to the MN MUTCD. Traffic signs not required by the MN MUTCD shall not be installed unless otherwise authorized by the Traffic Safety Committee (see below). II. Sign Inventory The City of Edina maintains a sign inventory using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software. This inventory includes the sign type (e.g. regulatory, warning, etc.), location, year installed (if known) and sheeting material type. III. Sign Installation and Removal Because traffic signs must be compliant with legal and technical criteria, and in order to enhance customer service through more timely responses to public inquiries regarding needs for traffic control, the City Council delegates authority for the installation, modification, and /or removal of traffic signs covered by this policy to the Director of Public Works. This delegation is subject to the following conditions: A. Expenditures for the installation, modification, and /or removal of traffic signs must be within budgetary appropriations approved by the City Council. rB. The City Council may, at its discretion, direct staff to bring certain proposals to install, modify, or remove a traffic signs before the City Council for consideration subsequent to the development of a recommendation provided by the Traffic Safety Committee. C. Staff will provide, on a regular basis (e.g. monthly), a report to the City Council summarizing public requests that have been processed by the Traffic Safety Committee. Various studies have found that excess road signage reduces the effectiveness of traffic control devices resulting in reduced safety, and imposes an unnecessary financial burden on road authorities. Therefore, the City's policy is to consider removal of signs which are not required to comply with an applicable Federal or State regulation or statute and which have been determined to be unnecessary for safety purposes. The removal of excess signage shall be based on an engineering study or judgment and will be reviewed by the Traffic Safety Committee. Studies have also found that various non - standard signs (e.g. Children At Play) are ineffective. Therefore, non - standard signs, defined as any sign not included in the MN MUTCD, will not be installed within the City, and may be removed at any time, without review through the above - described process. IV. Sign Maintenance and Replacement • In order to comply with retroreflectivity requirements, the City will use a combination of Visual Assessment and Expected Sign Life Management Methods and replace traffic signs as follows: REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 • A. Visual Assessment Method will be used for traffic signs with an unknown installation year (generally before 1998). One or both of the following procedures will be used as authorized by the Director of Engineering or the Director of Public Works. Comparison Panels Procedure: If a marginal sign is found during a nighttime field review, a comparison panel (which represents retroreflectivity levels above the specified minimums) is attached and the sign /panel is viewed. The signs found to be less bright than the panel would then be scheduled for replacement. 2. Consistent Parameters Procedure: Nighttime inspections would be conducted under similar factors that were used in the research to develop the minimum retroreflectivity levels. These factors include: using a pick -up truck or sport utility vehicle of a model year 2000 or newer, with an inspector who is at least 60 years old with 20/40 normal or corrected vision and 105 degrees of peripheral vision. 3. The Expected Sign Life Management Method will be used for traffic signs with a known installation year. Signs will be scheduled to be replaced according to the expected life of the sign reflective sheeting (according to current research). Signs may be replaced prior to the expiration date due to damage, vandalism, knock downs or other necessary reasons (see Damaged Sign Replacement • below). Replacement will be scheduled as follows: 4. Sheeting Material Types I (Engineer Grade) and III (High Intensity) a) South - facing signs: Replace after 12 years b) East and west - facing signs: Replace after 16 years c) North - facing signs: Replace after 20 years 5. Sheeting Material Types IV (High Intensity Prismatic) and VI (Diamond) a) South - facing signs: Replace after 15 years b) East and west- facing signs: Replace after 23 years c) North - facing signs: Replace after 30 years Priority shall be given to regulatory and warning signs on roads with higher vehicle usage and signs that serve a direct and essential safety function. Damaged, stolen, or missing signs (of any type) will be replaced according to this policy (see Damaged Sign Replacement below). V. Damaged Sign Replacement Damaged, stolen or missing signs will be replaced according to the following once reported to the • Public Works Department: A. High Priority (STOP) within one business day REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 • B. Intermediate Priority (Regulatory, Warning and Guide signs required by MnMUTCD) within two business days • • C. Low Priority (all others) within five business days VI. Modification and Deviation from Policy The City reserves the right to modify this policy at any time if deemed to be in the best interest of the City based on safety, economic, social and political considerations. The Director of Engineering and /or Public Works Director, or his /her designee, may authorize a deviation from the implementation of this policy with respect to a particular traffic sign when deemed to be in the best interest of the City based on safety, economic, social and political considerations. Such deviation shall be documented and include information supporting the deviation. Attachments: Current Traffic Sign Inventory Summary Estimated Costs for Traffic Sign Assessment and Replacement G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV\Policies \Traffic Sign Maintenance Policy \Item IV. C. Traffic Sign Installation and Maintenance Policy.docx • City of Edina: Current Traffic Sign Inventory Summary As of Jan. 12, 2015 Total Signs: 8,820 Total Regulatory, Warning & Guide Signs: 7,828 • Regulatory: 4,529 (1,087 stop signs) • Warning: 1,007 • Guide: 2,292 (2,278 Street "blade" signs) Sheeting Material: • I. Engineer Grade: 3,242 (41 %) 12 -20 year life expectancy • III. High Intensity: 1,027 (13 %) 12 -20 year life expectancy • IV. High Intensity Prismatic: 2,510 (32 %) 15 -30 year life expectancy • • VI. Diamond: 1,055 (13 %) 15 -30 year life expectancy • Unknown: 7 (1 %) Year of Installation: • Known: 4,510 (58 %) • Unknown: 3,318 (42 %) • 0 Traffic Sign Installation and Maintenance Policy: Estimated Costs Visual Assessment Method Staff estimates that the cost to visually inspect the 3,318 traffic signs with an unknown installation date will be approximately $7,500 in wages (these costs can be divided over a number of years). • Average hourly rate for part -time public works staff = $40 ($25 /hour for senior -aged staff + $14 /hour for younger staff) • Estimated number of signs to inspect per hour = 20 (obtained from MnDOT) • Estimated number of total hours needed to assess signs = 190 (assuming assessing 7 hours per day with one hour per day for start/end of day tasks) • Note: these figures represent labor costs for the visual assessments themselves and do not include necessary training costs). Traffic Sign Replacement Staff estimates that the cost of replacing the traffic signs in the City of Edina according to the proposed polity will be approximately $22,000 per year. This figure accounts for the average cost of the sign materials, the average compensation of sign shop members, the average lifespan of signs, and the time it takes to install a sign on a pre- existing pole. This calculation does not account for signs which are knocked over or damaged before their replacement date. • Estimated average time to replace a sign on a pre- existing pole = 10 minutes • Average compensation of sign shop employees = $44 per hour • Average lifespan of signs = 19.4 years The calculation below is based on the expected sign life as indicated in the proposed policy. This calculation assumes that half of the existing signs are Types I and III, and the other half are Types IV and VI, and that signs face all four cardinal directions in equal proportions. 19.4yr = 12yr + 16yr + 16yr + 20yr + 15yr + 23yr + 23yr + 30yr 8 • Approximate number of applicable signs in the city = 7,800 • Estimated range of costs for sign materials = $20 -$60 (for the calculation, $40 was used) • Cost of single sign replacement: • $88 (2 employees per hour) $40 sign materials + _ $54.67 per sign 6 (signs per hour) Page 1 of 2 0 • Total cost of sign replacement (for one sign life cycle) • • $54.67 per sign * 7,800 signs = $426,400 • Estimated annual cost of sign replacement $422,400 19.4 years $21,979.38 per year Page 2 of 2 • To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: May 6, 2015 • ,���RIg'BOTRiP1�O • Agenda Item #: IV. D. The Recommended Bid is ❑X Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Subject: Request for Purchase - Award of Quote Contract ENG 15 -8NB 2015 Storm Sewer Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: April 22, 2015 Company: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. ValleyRich Company Midwest Civil Constructors, LLC Northdale Construction Company, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Northwest Asphalt, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: June 22, 2015 Amount of Quote or Bid: $54,917.00 $61,943.00 $80,859.00 $91,406.97 $54,917.00 Over the past year, two significant storm drainage problems have been identified by Public Works staff. The first problem is located along the westerly Normandale Blvd immediately north of the city border with Bloomington. Roadway settlements adjacent to Nine Mile Creek have caused standing water and surface water overflow into the creek. The standing water presents safety concern for motorists and the overland flow has caused erosion problems on the creek bank. The proposed improvement here would install a catchbasin structure and a new pipe inlet into the creek. The second drainage problem is located in the parking lot of Public Storage located at 4425 77th Street West. A storm sewer located within an existing drainage and utility easement crossing the parking lot has collapsed and is unable to convey flow to its outlet at Nine Mile Creek. The lack of stormwater conveyance is causing flooding to properties to the north including the parking lot at 4401 76th Street West. Additionally, Public Works staff is expending considerable effort in pumping the pooled stormwater with each rainfall event. The scope of the repairs necessary at each of these sites is beyond the normal capabilities of Public Works staff. Accordingly, engineering staff prepared plans and specifications for the required improvements and received quotes from four capable contractors. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. submitted the lowest cost proposal to complete the repairs. Staff recommends awarding the 2015 Storm Sewer Improvements to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 O e= 0 v � • 'M�ORPORP`7�'� 0 18BA L Item #: IV. E. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject• Resolution No. 2015 -44 joint Powers Agreement with Edina Public School for the . Countryside H Neighborhood Improvement Project Action Requested: Approve Resolution No. 2015 -44 authorizing Mayor and City Manager to sign attached joint powers agreement with Independent School District 273 for sidewalk improvements at Countryside Elementary School in the Countryside H Neighborhood Improvement Project area. Information / Background: • This joint powers agreement details the responsibilities of each party for sidewalk improvements at Countryside Elementary School in the Countryside H Neighborhood Improvement Project area The project includes significant sidewalk improvements adjacent to the school as part of the city council iapproved "Active Routes to School" plan. Staff from each organization met on several occasions and the District agreed it would provide an easement adjacent to Countryside Elementary School, along the east side of Arbour Avenue allowing us to include a wide boulevard to increase pedestrian safety and save a row of substantial boulevard trees. With the city council ordering the installation of the sidewalk along Benton Avenue at the Dec. 9, 2014, public hearing, staff found it necessary to obtain a second easement form the District at the southwest corner of Benton Avenue and Tracey Avenue in order to adequately align the planned Benton Avenue sidewalk with the existing sidewalk in place on Tracy Avenue. In recognition of the value of the easements, a cost sharing agreement was established between the parties. In total, the bid prices associated with the Countryside Elementary School Sidewalks is $65,315.09. The City will contribute $15,539.44 from the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety funds to these sidewalks and the District's contribution is $49,775.65. Additionally, in order to have the City's contractor conduct work on the District's property, the agreement includes a temporary construction easement for this purpose. Staff believes that the final sidewalk project developed in negotiations with District staff is superior to stand alone designs and will benefit students making their way to Countryside Elementary School and beyond. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION • Staff believes the cost contributions to the District are fair in value to the level of benefit the easements provide as related to public safety and sidewalk system functionality. District staff has already executed the agreement. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015 -44 Joint Powers Agreement Page 2 G: \PV4\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2015 \ENG 15 -4 Countryside H \BA413 Countryside H\ADMIN \LEGAL \Countryside School \Cost Share Agreement \Item xx.x Countryside School Joint Power Agreement.docx • • RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -44 APPROVING CITY OF EDINA AND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, as part of the Countryside H Neighborhood Reconstruction project, public sidewalk improvement will be made by the City; and WHEREAS, the District has asked the City to improve sidewalks on the school property owned by the District in conjunction with the City's improvement of public sidewalk; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby approves the Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Edina and Independent School District 273 for the improvement of sidewalks. Dated: May 6, 2015 • Attest: Debra A. Mangen James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 . Fax 952 - 826 -0392 City Clerk • 0 • JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 2015, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 (EDINA), an independent school district created and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "District "). RECITALS A. As part of the Countryside H Neighborhood Reconstruction Project, public sidewalk improvements will be made by the City. B. The District has asked the City to improve sidewalks on the School Property owned by the District as identified on the attached Exhibit "A" ( "District sidewalks ") in conjunction with the City's improvement of public sidewalks. C. Minn. Stat. § 471.15, et seq., authorizes the City and District to enter into a joint powers agreement to install and pay for the sidewalks. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. Improvements. If the City receives satisfactory bids and awards a contract for construction of the public sidewalks, the City shall also have the District sidewalks constructed. The District hereby grants the city a temporary construction easement over the district sidewalks and adjacent area to construct the District sidewalks. The temporary easement will end upon completion of the construction work. 2. Payment. Upon completion of the District sidewalks the District shall pay the City $49,777.65 within thirty days of receipt of an invoice from the city. 3. Indemnification. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other 181048A 1 applicable law govern the parties' liability. To the full extent permitted by law, this Agreement • is intended to be and shall be construed as a "cooperative activity" and it is the intent of the parties that they shall be deemed a "single governmental unit" for the purposes of liability, all as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subd. 1 a (a); provided further that for purposes of that statute, each party to this Agreement expressly declines responsibility for the acts or omissions of the other party. In addition to the foregoing, northing herein shall be construed to waive or limit any immunity from, or limitation on, liability available to either parry, whether set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or otherwise. THIS AGREEMENT is executed by the parties hereto the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA • BY: James Hovland, Mayor an Scott Neal, City Manager INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 273 y , Name: t Title: 2 18I048v1 • • n LJ 181048v1 EXHIBIT "A" c19N'�CEniML sawn 01vVROJECTSKDYfPA07511a191[M1G Is1 [avNrytl<If,AM l0 [au'`b71U8 H104UD'r.G! 5 sroa nrloaxnur mwKtryar N obve«0, wk 7 sa, 7/le/lols 16503:11 AM, 11 nr k" E i Y S D Z1 D r v D r � s 08260 PN S: 0+00 081.6 COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 iiiV777 1 _ a � 11E I eez64 v`•" g C I 0 a� z FFW90N5 .s� k k ai O f � r- D - 6e9 J m R �� 086.J4 I NmD O at ° A P 9 Dg m o + n z — v 8 � ' . Z I `, Fri > D y W � s 08260 PN S: 0+00 081.6 COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 iiiV777 1 _ a � w to 1 eez64 v`•" g I 0 a� z FFW90N5 .s� k k O n z r- D - 6e9 J N N �� 086.J4 z at ° A P 9 Dg m o + n z — v U1 a D chi g s ' . Z I `, Fri > D y W 88582 � s 08260 PN S: 0+00 081.6 COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 iiiV777 1 _ a � � i to 1 eez64 I FFW90N5 oes o9 6e9 J 086.J4 eea 6 667.66 `, 6652 88582 809.9 1 690.07 I P t 1 S0. 650.6 7� 6921S 691.5 En L lung N 4 1 P 1+ 000 65 893.1 893.1 r � I- 69517 I S,- 2+ S. 696.3 , y `�N x97.76 :2 a9u PN : +60. \1 e99.w e99,7 13 lo.. sz P + 01 .00 901.28 PA P 9030 Y31 903.17 W2 9 901, 1 904.40 903.3 v ', 9os.64 906.1 C ICI ' II Z II ;0 CD a °I G ay D 4*, 1, u - - - Y — j j Li ANDf 1 "� �T Np- ANO THAT 1 AN A DULY U DER T E LAWS OF EAO MEEA a�up HE Am ,A E a. COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 iiiV777 1 _ a � � i to 1 IT I y ; I gI� r r Ibl I , I 11 F1 x o cm3 ro $$11 v m axz W C7 Z D D N C x ro z � pg � Z m 0 z �• 19J m� o L D Z a ANDf 1 "� �T Np- ANO THAT 1 AN A DULY U DER T E LAWS OF EAO MEEA a�up HE Am ,A E a. COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 SIDEWALK PLAN ARBOUR AVE TO COUNTRYSIDE SCHOOL FFW90N5 a ANDf 1 "� �T Np- ANO THAT 1 AN A DULY U DER T E LAWS OF EAO MEEA a�up HE Am ,A E a. COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT Q`��,3 CITY OF EDINA a a ESA WN X55; 9 '° 952 -826 -0392 SIDEWALK PLAN ARBOUR AVE TO COUNTRYSIDE SCHOOL FFW90N5 0 0 rx7NICWT A MMNAK la N m e O - pO O N D O N oNo A D A w 1 o D r� O O N 0 osp 1v�73 LD Oopq � a 0 2 A v (o PLAN STUART AVENUE BENTON AVENUE o GGKK7`7` Z�CD Mc 1 Y . ��� l► �N 3£33 .1 I ZN R-� c N \\ i Qq 0Iti i 4 r1 I N oNo A D A w 1 o D r� O O N 0 osp 1v�73 LD Oopq � a 0 2 A v (o PLAN STUART AVENUE BENTON AVENUE o GGKK7`7` Z�CD Mc D $ ¢ I M Y CERTIFY MAT TMS DER WAS DIRECT S ER WE OR OER NY aRECT 50G[gN$OV AN0 MAT I M1 A DULY u �" " COUNTRYSIDE H NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT 7450 MEMO e« ,MO OF= CITY OF EDINA EOM. NN WN -3037 95z =sZ6;03 z PLAN STUART AVENUE BENTON AVENUE �91NA, o Fe. Cn Con Item #: IV. F. Action Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Promenade Phase 4 — Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant Action Requested: Authorize Mayor to sign Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreement Information / Background: Resolution 2014 -1 1 1 approving a grant application was approved by City Council on October 21, 2014, for soil remediation for Promenade Phase 4 from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund (ERF). The grant was successful and the City of Edina was awarded $39,000 to assist in soil remediation. Attachments: Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Grant Agreement G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV \PR0JECTS \C0NTRACTS \2014 \ENG 14$ Promenade Phase 4 \ADMIN \150505 ERF Grant.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 • Contract No. A142765 ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE FUND GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES This Agreement is between the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "County") at A2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, MN.55487 by its Department of Environmental Services ( "Department") and the City of Edina ( "Grantee ") with offices located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota, 55439. Grantee has submitted an application to the County for a grant to be used for the for contaminated soil excavation, disposal, associated consulting activities and MPCA fees at the Centennial Lake Promenade project site located at 7151 and 7298 Promenade in Edina. The application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference. The parties agree as follows: 1. GRANT AMOUNT AND COMPLETION The County shall grant to Grantee a sum not to exceed Thirty-nine thousand dollars ($39,000.00) ( "BRF Grant ") which funds shall be only for expenses incurred in performing activities specified in the Application and as may be further described in Exhibit A to this Agreement or as approved by the County. Approved activities as may be described in Exhibit A and in the application, attached as Exhibit B, are referred as the "Project ". Administrative costs incurred by Grantee are not eligible for reimbursement. Exhibits A and B are attached and incorporated by this reference. Grantee shall complete the Project within two (2) years of execution of this Agreement and within the terms stated herein. Any material change in the scope of the Project, including time schedule and budget, must be approved in • writing by the County. Upon approval by the County Administrator, the duration of this Agreement may be extended for up to twelve (12) months. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing such purposes and activities described in the Application and this Agreement. 2. ACCOUNTING AND RECORD KEEPING For all expenditures of funds made pursuant to this Agreement, Grantee shall keep financial records including properly executed contracts, invoices, and other documents sufficient to evidence in proper detail the nature and propriety of the expenditures. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The County, the State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of Grantee and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 3. PAYMENT/DISBURSEMENT SCHEDULE County will disburse funds to Grantee pursuant to this Agreement, based on a payment request form provided by the County, submitted by Grantee and approved by the County. Payment requests can be submitted once per month and must be accompanied by supporting invoices that relate to activities in the approved Project budget. Subject to verification of adequacy of a written disbursement request and approval of consistency with this Agreement, the County will disburse the requested amount to Grantee within six (6) weeks after receipt of a written disbursement request. The final request for disbursement must be submitted within six (6) months of the expiration date of this • Agreement. • 4. REPORTING Grantee shall submit to the County a report on the distribution of funds and the progress of the Project covered from the date of the grant award through June 30 of each year. The reports must be received by the County no later than July 25 of each year. The report shall identify specific goals listed in the application and quantitatively measure the progress of such goals. Reporting forms will be provided by the County. In addition, the required documentation listed in Exhibit A should be supplied as it becomes available. 5. CONTRACTS Grantee shall include in any contract, provisions that require contractors to comply with all applicable State and Federal laws and regulations regarding employment and workplace safety. In accordance with Hennepin County's policies against discrimination, Grantee shall not exclude any person from full employment rights or participation in or the benefits of any program, service, or activity on the grounds of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, public assistance status, or national origin; and no person who is protected by applicable Federal or State laws, rules, or regulations against discrimination shall be otherwise subjected to discrimination. Public Grantees and any contractors or subcontractors performing services as part of this Agreement shall follow that public Grantee's Affirmative Action policy against discrimination. 6. TERMINATION, CANCELLATION AND ASSIGNMENT This Agreement may be canceled by the County upon sixty (60) days written notice to Grantee without cause. In the event of such cancellation, Grantee shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for work or services satisfactorily performed up to the effective date of such cancellation. • If the County finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement, that reasonable progress has not been made toward commencement or completion of the assessment and/or clean-up activities specified in the Application and this Agreement, notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary and after written notice and reasonable opportunity to cure, the County may refuse to disburse additional funds and/or require the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed, to the extent such funds were used for purposes other than activities contemplated by this Agreement. If the County finds that there has been a violation of any state, federal or local law, the County may upon written notice immediately cancel this Agreement in its entirety and may withhold or-delay payment. In the event of a decision to withhold or delay payment, the County shall furnish prior written notice to Grantee specifically identifying the reason for withholding or delaying such payment. This Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the County. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Grantee shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the Project. Nothing is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of co- partners between the parties or as constituting Grantee as the agent, representative, or employee of the County for any purpose. Grantee shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services and activities performed under this Agreement. Any personnel of Grantee or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by Grantee under this Agreement will have no contractual relationship with the County, and will not be considered employees of the County. The County shall not be responsible for any claims that arise out of employment or alleged employment under the Minnesota Economic Security Law or the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of any personnel, including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against Grantee, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees. Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, • agents, and employees from all such claims irrespective of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission, or court. Such personnel or other persons shall neither require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights, or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the County, including, without limitation, tenure 2 • rights, medical and hospital care, sick leave, Workers' Compensation, Re- employment Compensation, disability, severance pay, and retirement benefits. 8. INDEMNIFICATION Grantee agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of Grantee, its contractors or subcontractors or anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or any party that directly or indirectly benefits from the activities specified in this Agreement, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the activities specified in this Agreement and against all loss by reason of the failure of Grantee to perform any obligation under this Agreement. 9. INSURANCE In order to protect the County and those listed above under the indemnification provision, Grantee agrees at all times during the term of this Agreement and beyond such term when so required, to have and keep or cause to have and be kept in force, and to cause all contractors to do likewise, the following insurance coverages under either a purchased insurance or self-insurance program: Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability Coverage: Limits General Aggregate $2,000,000 Products - Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000 Each Occurrence — Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000 • 2. Automobile Liability — Combined single limit each occurrence for 1,500,000 bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non - owned, and hired automobiles. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: a. Workers' Compensation Statutory If the contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota laws. b. Employer's Liability. Bodily Injury by: Accident — Each accident 500,000 Disease — Policy Limit 500,000 Disease — Each Employee 500,000 4. Professional Liability — Per Claim 1,500,000 Aggregate 2,000,000 The insurance must be maintained continuously for a period of two years after the termination of this Agreement. Grantee shall require that any independent contractors rendering assessment and/or clean-up activities under this Agreement furnish certificates of insurance to Grantee of the insurance coverages listed above, and provide updated certificates as coverages expire. • An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of Grantee to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this Agreement. Grantee and their contractors shall not commence work until they have obtained required insurance and filed with the Grantee properly executed Certificates of Insurance establishing compliance. The certificate(s) must name the Grantee as the certificate holder and Hennepin County as an additional insured for the commercial general liability coverage(s) for all operations covered under the Agreement. Grantee shall immediately notify County of any cancellations or reduction of insurance coverage. Grantee shall provide copies of insurance certificates to County upon request. If Grantee fails to furnish proof coverages, if requested by the County, the County may withhold payments and/or pursue any other rights or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. 10. MERGER AND MODIFICATION It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. Any alterations, variations, modifications or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties. 11. MINNESOTA LAWS GOVERN The Laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this Agreement and the legal relations between the parties and performance under it. The appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within the County of Hennepin; State of Minnesota. Litigation, however, in the federal courts involving the parties will be in the appropriate federal court within the State of Minnesota. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will not be affected. • 12. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Grantee shall acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the County in promotional materials, press releases, reports and publications relating to the Project activities described in Exhibit A which are funded in whole or in part with the grant funds. The acknowledgment should contain the following language: Financing for this project was provided in part by the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Until the Project activities funded by this Agreement are completed, the Grantee shall ensure the above acknowledgment language, or alterative language approved the County, is included on all signs located at the Project or construction sites that identify Project funding partners or entities providing financial support for the project. Until the Project activities funded by this Agreement are completed and for. one year after that date, the Grantee shall provide advance notice to the County, including an invitation to the appropriate County Commissioner's office, of any public events related to the Project. 13. HENNEPIN COUNTY PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX AND PROPERTY TAX Grantee shall require the grant recipient to affirm that it and its officers have paid all Hennepin County personal property taxes and property taxes due on all of its Hennepin County properties for taxes owed on or before December 31, 2014. If the County finds that property taxes, have not been paid by grant recipient, grant recipient's owner and grant recipient's board of directors (if any)], County may refuse to disburse funds or require the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed pursuant to section 6 of this Agreement. 14. USE OF ERF GRANT AS A LOAN • An ERF Grant from County to Grantee may not be disbursed by Grantee to any entity as a loan. COUNTY BOARD AUTHORIZATION • GRANTEE, having signed this agreement, and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly authorized this agreement on the 27h of January, 2015, and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Reviewed by the County Attorney's COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Office STATE OF MINNESOTA • Assistant County Attorney Date: Recommended for Approval By: Director, Department of Environmental Services Date: RIM ATTEST Date: By: Date: By: Date: Chair of Its County Board Deputy/Clerk of County Board David Hough, County Administrator Assistant County Administrator, Public Works GRANTEE Grantee warrants that the person who. executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on behalf of GRANTEE as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.* Name: City of Edina Bv: James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina Date: *GRANTEE shall submit applicable documentation (articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances) that confirms the signatory's delegation of authority. This documentation shall be submitted at the time Grantee returns the Agreement to the County. Documentation is not required for a sole proprietorship. E Exhibit A Centennial Lake Promenade Project Summary The project site is a 2 -acre park with trails that will be redesigned with a pedestrian promenade, a new trail, and water features. In the past, the site was used for mining aggregate with subsequent undocumented filling. Investigation of the site detected the presence of elevated levels of arsenic, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalents and petroleum as diesel range organics (DRO) in the soil. During construction, an estimated 750 cubic yards of contaminated soil will be excavated and sent to a landfill. This new promenade will provide improved biking, walking, recreation, and access to shopping in close proximity to multi - family residential and commercial businesses. The applicant requests ERF assistance for contaminated soil excavation, disposal, associated consulting activities and MPCA fees. The following costs are based on a budget submitted by Grantee. Modifications must be approved in writing by the County. Approved Budget for the Centennial Lake Promenade Project Site: Activities relating to the contaminated soil excavation, disposal, associated consulting activities and MPCA fees $39,000.00 Total: $39,000.00 Required Documentation to be Submitted to Hennepin County: Response Action Plan (RAP) Implementation Report Consultant/Contractor Invoices (include time period covered by invoice, specific activities related to time, and documentation supporting expenses, including subcontractor and analytical invoices - include unit rates and quantities, subcontractor markup limited to 10% or less) Contaminated soil disposal documentation (unit rates, one manifest per truck per load, and weight/load tickets). Include a spread sheet matching manifest, load tickets, and final weights Clean fill documentation MPCA approval letters and invoices Annual Project Progress /Summary Report(s). • A -1 r Exhibit S ERF Application Centennial Lake Promenade Ra] To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: May 6, 2015 O le =_ Cn AC�R�B Tti Agenda Item #: IV. G. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Continue to June 16, 2015 Findings Of Fact For Denial, Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Building Height, Density and Floor Area Ratio, 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC. Action Requested: Approve the extension requested for City action to June 16, 2015. Information /Background: (Deadline for City Action- June 16, 2015) The applicant has requested another extension to June 16, 2015 for the City to take action on their development project. They wish to continue to monitor the development of guiding principles for development in the Southdale Area and the west side of France Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: • Applicant request for extension City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Cary Teague •From: Adam Seraphine <adam @adamseraphine.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:48 AM To: Cary Teague; Lori Boisclair Subject: 7200 France Extension Dear Cary, 7200 France, LLC, the applicant, hereby agrees to extend the action deadline for its redevelopment of 7200 France application, under Mn. Stat. 15.99 to June 16, 2015. Our intention for the extension is to allow for the completion of the first stage of the Southdale area workshop. It is our understanding this notice satisfies the City's extension requirement. Please confirm the City's receipt and acceptance of 7200 France LLC's extension. Thank you, 7200 France, LLC • ADAM SERAPHINE 5353 Wayzata Blvd :: Suite 400 :: Minneapolis, MN :: 55416 PH 612.616.5801 :: FX 952.400.5611 • •'1cnRAOFI`��9 • 1888 L Item #: IV. H. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ reformation F7 Subject: Continue to June 16, 2015 Findings Of Fact For Denial, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan 7200 France Avenue, 7200 LLC. Action Requested: Approve the extension requested for City action to June 16, 2015. Information /Background: (Deadline for City Action- June 16, 2015) The applicant has requested another extension to June 16, 2015 for the City to take action on their development project. They wish to continue to monitor the development of guiding principles for development in the Southdale Area and the west side of France Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: • Applicant request for extension City of Edina • 4801 W. 50,h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Cary Teague Wrorn: Adam Seraphine <adam @adamseraphine.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:48 AM To: Cary Teague; Lori Boisclair Subject: 7200 France Extension Dear Cary, 7200 France, LLC, the applicant, hereby agrees to extend the action deadline for its redevelopment of 7200 France application, under Mn. Stat. 15.99 to June 16, 2015. Our intention for the extension is to allow for the completion of the first stage of the Southdale area workshop. It is our understanding this notice satisfies the City's extension requirement. Please confirm the City's receipt and acceptance of 7200 France LLC's extension. Thank you, 7200 France, LLC *ADAM SERAPHINE 5353 Wayzata Blvd :: Suite 400 :: Minneapolis, MN :: 55416 PH 612.616.5801 :: FX 952.400.5611 is o e -Y Cn • l���ORPOR.A�S9 • 7888 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. I. From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Approve Settlement Agreement with Meisinger Construction Action Requested: Approve settlement agreement with Meisinger Construction. Information / Background: The Council awarded the Promenade Phase 4 project contract in the amount of $1,268,550 to Meisinger Construction on February 17, 2015. Meisinger's bid was the lowest responsible bid. On February 24, the • City received notice from Meisinger that it was withdrawing its bid due to a significant mathematical error it made in its bid package. Legal counsel for Meisinger Construction and the City Attorney's Office have reached a tentative settlement of all claims relating to Meisinger's withdrawal of their bid. The bid bond for the Meisinger bid was $63,427.50. The proposed settlement for all claims is for the Meisinger Construction to pay the City $12,500. The proposed settlement agreement is based on an estimate of the cost of legal service to pursue a greater settlement and the probability of success of that effort. The City Attorney and I both recommend the Council approved the proposed settlement and direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary documents to implement it. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • City of Edina Proclamation WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, and streets; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, NOW, THEREFORE, I, James Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of May 17.23, 2015 as `National Public Works Week" in The City of Edina, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. Dated: May 6, 2015 • James B. Hovland, Mayor Mayor and Council David Nelson, Police Chief National Police Week Proclamation Action Requested: •'�tURF'ORA�40 � 18HH Agenda Item #: Action Discussion Information Adopt the attached Proclamation of National Police Week in the City of Edina for the week of May 10 -16, 2015. Information / Background: In 1962, President John F. Kennedy signed a proclamation which designated May 15th as Peace Officers Memorial Day and the week in which that date falls as Police Week. Currently, tens of thousands of law enforcement officers from around the world converge on Washington, DC to participate in a number of planned events which honor those that have paid the ultimate sacrifice. Let this be a time to thank and honor those who dedicate their lives to serving the public. It is a week that should be set aside so everyone can be made aware of their hard work and dedication of the officers of the Edina Police Department. 4801 W. SO' St. • Edina, MN 55424 PROCLAMATION NATIONAL POLICE WEEK 2015 WHEREAS, the week of May I Oth — 16th, 2015, is National Police Week in the United States; and WHEREAS, there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers serving in communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Edina Police Department; and WHEREAS, nearly 60,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 16,000 injuries; and WHEREAS, since the first recorded death in 1791, almost 20,000 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty; and WHEREAS, the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Memorial in Washington, D.C.; and WHEREAS, 273 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law Enforcement Memorial this spring, including 126 officers killed in 2014 and 147 officers killed in previous years; and WHEREAS, the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be honored during the National Law Enforcement Officer Memorial Fund's 27th Annual Candlelight Vigil, on the May 13th, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Candlelight Vigil is part of National Police Week, which takes place this year on May 1 0th -16th; and WHEREAS, May 15th is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all the fallen officers and their families and U.S. Flags should be flown at half- staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims May 1 0th -16th, 2015, as NATIONAL POLICE WEEK In the City of Edina, MN and call upon the people of Edina to observe this week in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep the residents and city of Edina safe. Dated this 6th day of May, 2015. 0 James B. Hovland, Mayor WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, • WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, Item No. V.C. Monarch Butterfly Month Proclamation Ow e �. [2fte a PROCLAMATION MONARCH BUTTERFLY MONTH MAY 2015 the Monarch butterfly has been the official butterfly of Minnesota since 2000; and the Monarch butterfly population is down from 350 million to 60 million butterflies, and the Monarch butterfly migrates from Mexico to Minnesota; and Monarch butterflies feed on nectar from flowers like Coneflowers, Black Eyed Susans and Blazing Stars; and Monarch butterflies will only lay their eggs on milkweed plants, and Monarch butterfly larvae need mildewed plants for food; and one Monarch caterpillar needs 20 -25 milkweed leaves to turn into a purpae; and it takes one month to grow from an egg to a caterpillar to a Monarch butterfly; and NOW, THERE, I James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina do hereby proclaim, the month of May 2015 the time for Edina residents to plant milkweed seeds Dated this 6th of May 2015. James B. Hovland Mayor 0 /1�Ar� o e s • j�cola0 PROCLAMATION PRESERVATION MONTH MAY 2015 Agenda Item V. D. WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth and sustainable development, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS, "it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the • contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a people; and WHEREAS, "Explore Edina's Hidden Treasures" is the theme for Preservation Month 2015, sponsored by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the City Council of the City of Edina, do proclaim May 2015, as Preservation Month, and call upon the people of Edina to join their fellow citizens in recognizing and participating in this special observance. Dated this 6th day of May 2015. James B. Hovland Mayor • Q�� N 21 C� C7 1 � � • I�'ooxPOSe -��9� rasa AGENDA ITEM V. E. 2015 Heritage Award Presentation [—] No packet data Oral presentation [-� Information coming 0 0 171 ore y • l�QORPORe �� • 1888 2015 EDINA HERITAGE AWARD PRESENTED TO SAVORY'S GARDENS Arlene Savory & Dennis Savory 5300 Whiting Avenue May 6, 2015 Recognized for being A THRIVING NURSERY BUSINESS SINCE 1946 �g1NA,11�1� a e ,HHH To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VLA. From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Action Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Consideration Of Applications Received For A Cable Communications Franchise Action Requested: Conduct a Public Hearing on a Request for Consideration Of Applications Received For A Cable Communications Franchise. Information / Background: The City has received a request from CenturyLink for a non - exclusive cable communication franchise. The first action necessary for the City to process this request is for the City Council to conduct a public hearing • j on the proposal. At the April 25, 2015 meeting, the City Council scheduled a public hearing for the request for May 6, 2015. Mr. Brian Grogan, legal counsel and administrator of the Southwest Cable Commission, will attend the May 6 Council meeting to assist the City Council with this matter. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 StarTribune - Print Page �x atarTribune CenturyLink nears approval for cable TV in Minneapolis Article by: Eric Roper Star Tribune April 27, 2015 - 7:45 PM http://www.startribune.com/printarticle/?id=3(YI494061 As it seeks to compete with Comcast cable TV in Minneapolis, CenturyLink is pledging to make its service available to at least 15 percent of the city within the next two years. Under a plan that won initial approval from a City Council panel Monday, CenturyLink would initially deploy its PRISM TV service on a limited basis to parts of all 13 wards in the city. The goal is to reach the entire city within five years, though it is not a commitment. The Minneapolis franchise is one of many CenturyLink is seeking across the Twin Cities area; it has also applied for franchise agreements in several suburbs. Precisely where PRISM will initially roll out in Minneapolis remains a mystery — the company claims it is a trade secret. But under the agreement, the area must include a significant number of households below the city's $49,560 median income. The 15 percent initial rollout is a step down from earlier expectations that the service would reach 30 percent of the city within two years. But starting in 2016, the company will have to expand service further if it proves popular with customers. The franchise agreement will go to the full City Council for a final vote on May 15. • "I think overall, having another cable service provider in the city is going to be helpful for residents, in terms of lowering the • cost of service and providing additional channels," said Council Member Andrew Johnson. Those testifying Monday were largely supportive of the plan, particularly Centuryl-ink's commitment to providing culturally diverse programming — not a component of Comcast's agreement. CenturyLink also committed to provide all city channels in HD. Viewers would access those public meetings and other programs through a selection screen — known as the "Minneapolis Mosaic" on channel 14. The franchise agreement would last only five years, compared to Comcast's 12 -year agreement, allowing the city revisit the terms. "It gives a short time period for CenturyLink to really act out its values and also act out the values of the city of Minneapolis," Council Member Blong Yang said. "And after five years we can go back to the negotiating table to see whether they've done what they've promised to do." Eric Roper • 612- 673 -1732 Twitter: @StribRoper © 2015 Star Tribune 1 of 1 4/30/2015 7:54 AM 0 • • City of Minneapolis Cable Officer Report On CenturyLink Cable Franchise Application i Matthew Laible, City of Minneapolis Cable Officer Peter W. Ginder, Deputy City Attorney Michael R. Bradley, Bradley Hagen & Gullikson, LLC March 13, 2015 Executive Summary This Report addresses the application for a cable television franchise to Qwest Broadband Services, Inc., doing business as CenturyLink ( "CenturyLink "), a wholly owned subsidiary of CenturyLink, Inc. and its subsidiaries. CenturyLink filed a franchise application with the City of Minneapolis (the "City ") on January 20, 2015 asking the City to grant the company a franchise to provide cable services within the territorial boundaries of the City. The City held a public hearing on February 23, 2015, before the Ways and Means Committee. The public hearing remained open until February 27, 2015, to allow the public additional time to comment on the application, at which time the public hearing closed. Following the close of the public hearing, the Cable Officer commenced review of the application. Peter Ginder, Deputy City Attorney, and Mike Bradley of Bradley Hagen & Gullikson, LLC, long -time outside counsel to the City on cable franchising matters, assisted the Cable Officer in the review and drafting of this Report. Upon review of the public record on CenturyLink's application materials, it is the Cable Officer's recommendation that staff now be directed to negotiate a cable franchise with CenturyLink, consistent with this Report. The Cable Officer anticipates that the resulting competition between CenturyLink and Comcast will benefit cable subscribers through better service, lower rates, and improved programming choices. • It is recommended that any CenturyLink cable franchise contain commitments that taken • as a whole are comparable (but not necessarily identical) to those in the existing cable franchise. This approach should permit the City to promote its interest in developing competition for cable service, while preventing CenturyLink or the incumbent cable franchise holder, Comcast, from obtaining an unfair competitive advantage. A cable franchise is a valuable privilege to use the public rights to provide residents cable service. Any franchise, while recognizing that CenturyLink would be the second wire -line franchised cable operator, must adequately address the following issues: • Adequate protections to the public to prevent economic redlining or "cherry picking." • The provision of culturally diverse programming. • Fair and Reasonable build -out requirements with the goal of CenturyLink providing competitive cable services throughout the entire City within a reasonable time and in an equitable manner. • Provisions consistent with Level Playing Field requirements under applicable law addressing: • Area to be served • Public, Educational, and Governmental ( "PEG ") Television • Payment of a Franchise Fee to the City • Indemnification from any litigation resulting from the grant of a franchise. If the Cable Officer's recommendation is adopted by the City Council, City staff should be directed to commence negotiating a cable franchise with CenturyLink immediately. The City Council should issue a notice of intent to award a cable franchise by ordinance. Once a cable • 0 franchise ordinance is introduced, a public hearing on the ordinance will be scheduled before the Ways and Means Committee. The City Council may act on the cable franchise ordinance any time seven days following the public hearing on the cable franchise ordinance. At the time of the City Council decision to award a cable franchise by ordinance or to deny the award of a cable franchise, it will need to make findings of fact in support of its decision. ii Section 1 The CenturyLink Application and Public Record In the summer of 2014, CenturyLink publically announced that it would begin offering 1 Gig internet service in the City of Minneapolis and the surrounding cities in the Twin Cities area. Shortly afterwards, CenturyLink approached the City of Minneapolis about obtaining a cable franchise. In December, 2014, CenturyLink informed City staff that it was prepared to apply for a cable franchise with the City. The City then published a Notice of Intent to Franchise in compliance with the Minnesota Cable Act.' See Exhibit 1. CenturyLink submitted a timely franchise application on January 20, 2015, to the City. See Exhibit 2. The City issued a request of information, to which CenturyLink responded. See Exhibits 3 and 4. A public hearing was held before the Ways and Means Committee on February 23, 2015, where additional public testimony and comments were received by the City. See Exhibits 5 — 8.2 The purpose of this report is to review the CenturyLink application in light of the public record and recommend whether City staff should be directed to negotiate a cable franchise with the company. Section 2 Impact of Competition on Consumers and Challenges to New Entrant The Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC') is the expert agency in the country on communications issues. It has addressed the impact of competitive cable franchises on consumers. The FCC recognized that, "[n]ew competitors are entering markets for the delivery is of services historically offered by monopolists: traditional phone companies are primed to enter the cable market, while traditional cable companies are competing in the telephony market. "3 According to the FCC, both traditional cable and traditional phone companies are projected to offer customers a "triple play" of voice, high -speed Internet access, and video services over their respective networks. Id. When a traditional phone company enters into the marketplace the FCC has found, [CJompetition for delivery of bundled services will benefit consumers by driving down prices and improving the quality of service offerings. Id. at para. 2 (emphasis added). Last year, the FCC found that average prices in communities with effective competition increased less than in communities without effective competition. See Report on Cable Industry Prices, DA 14 -672, at ¶ 4 (Rel. May 16, 2014). The Report on Cable Industry Prices found the price per channel for expanded basic service is 13.5 percent lower in effective competition areas. Id. at ¶ 16. ' See Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238. 2 The Public Hearing can be viewed at: https:// www. youtube.com/watch ?v= ZgCoFZanYgY s See In the Matter of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No. 05 -311, at ¶ 2 (Rel. March 5, 2007) (the "621" Order) (the "621 Order "). The 621 Order is attached as Exhibit 9. The 621 Order was upheld on appeal. See Alliance for Community Media v. FCC, • 529 F.3d 763 (6t' Cir. 2008), attached as Exhibit 10. 0 The FCC has also recognized some of the challenges of being the second cable operator in the marketplace. In its 621 Order, the FCC found, [T]he circumstances surrounding competitive entry are considerably different than those in existence at the time incumbent cable operators obtained their franchises. Incumbent cable operators originally negotiated franchise agreements as a means of acquiring or maintaining a monopoly position. [A second] entrant cannot assume that it will quickly -- or ever -- amass the same number or percentage of subscribers that the incumbent cable operator captured 621 Order at ¶ 26 (emphasis added, footnotes omitted). Applicants for competitive cable franchises, unlike an incumbent cable provider, "do not have the promise of revenues from video services to offset the costs of such deployment." 621 Order at ¶ 3. The competitor faces "financial risk" and "uncertainty" when entering the market. Id. at ¶ 28. Section 3 The Incumbent Franchised Cable Operator — Comcast • The history of cable franchising within the City goes back to the 1970s. The City initially granted a cable communications franchise to Northern Cablevision of Minneapolis, Inc. ( "Northern Cablevision ") in 1979 by enacting ordinance 79 -OR -263. In 1982, the City divided the City's cable franchise into two areas, with Northern Cablevision (d/b /a Storer) and Minneapolis Cablesystems (d/b /a Rogers) each granted a franchise for approximately one -half of the City's total geographic area. In 1983, Rogers acquired the Northern Cablevision franchise area, thereafter holding franchise rights for the entire City. See 83 -OR -320. Several changes in ownership, structure and name took place after 1983. In 1995, Time Warner Cable became the owner of the franchise, but continued to operate as Paragon Cable pursuant to the enactment of 95 -OR -096. In 2000, the franchised operator began doing business as Time Warner Cable. See 2000 -OR -050. The franchise was transferred to Comcast in 2006. See 2006R -371. In 2009 the franchise was renewed. The present franchise ordinance, as amended, is codified in the Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Appendix H. Earlier this year, the City conditionally approved the transfer of the franchise to GreatLand Connections. See 2015R- 055. If the conditions in the resolution are met, the Comcast franchise will be transferred to a new company called GreatLand Connections. When the City initially granted a cable franchise, the cable operator proposed to build out its system throughout the City within 2.5 years. See 79 -OR -263, Addendum A at p. 9. Due to litigation, construction under the 1979 franchise was delayed. In 1982, the build -out commitment was amended to be completed within 3 years. See 82 -OR -206, Art. II, Section 3, and Addendum A, Section B; and 82 -OR -209, Art. II, Section 3, and Addendum A, Section B. • The cable system was substantially completed by 1986. However, by 1985 and 1986, the 2 incumbent cable operator claimed to have "a cash shortfall substantially in excess of prior • projections" and requested and received from the City relief from certain franchise commitments in an effort to "enable Company to achieve financial stability..." See 86 -OR -164. Since the franchise was granted in 1979, no other cable franchise has been granted in the City. Section 4 The City's Authority to Franchise State law requires that "[a] municipality shall require a franchise or extension permit of any cable communications system providing service within the municipality." Minn. Stat. § 23 8.08, Subd. 1(a). The City's Charter further authorizes the City Council to grant and regulate any lawful franchise. Minneapolis City Charter § 4.1(d). Additionally, a cable service provider must obtain a cable franchise prior to offering cable service. See 47 U.S.C. § 541(b)(1). Section 5 Applicable Federal, State and Local Legal Requirements The applicable legal requirements for examining an initial franchise application are contained in the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended (the "Federal Cable Act "), Chapter 238 of the Minnesota Statues (the "Minnesota Cable Act "), and the City's Policies and Procedures Governing Application, Review and Recommendations Regarding Grant of Competitive Cable Franchises (the "Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures "). Under these requirements, the City cannot unreasonably refuse to award an additional 40 competitive cable franchise, nor may it award an applicant a franchise on material terms that are more favorable or less burdensome than certain terms contained in the City's existing franchise with Comcast. The specific procedures to be followed in soliciting and reviewing cable franchise applications are contained in the Minnesota Statutes and the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures. Substantive criteria the City may use in evaluating applications are set forth in the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures and the Federal Cable Act. Section 6 Cable Franchise Application Requirements — State and Local A. The State Cable Franchise Application Process The Minnesota Cable Act, found in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 238, lays out the process for granting an additional cable franchise. The following is a summary of the franchising process found in Section 238.081: ➢ Publication of Notice. A notice of intent to franchise must be published once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation. The statute identifies the information required in the notice, such as (1) the name of the municipality making the request; (2) the closing date for submission of applications; (3) a statement of the application fee, if any, and the method for its submission; (4) a statement by the franchising authority of the services to be offered; (5) a statement by the franchising 4 See Minn. Stat. § 238.081, Subd. 1 -7. • 3 authority of criteria and priorities against which the applicants for the franchise must be evaluated; (6) a statement that applications for the franchise must contain at least the information required by state law; (7) the date, time, and place for the public hearing, to hear proposals from franchise applicants; and (8) the name, address, and telephone number of the individuals who may be contacted for further information. ➢ Written Notice. In addition to publishing the notice of intent to franchise in one or more newspapers, a franchising authority must mail copies of the notice of intent to franchise to any person it has identified as being a potential candidate for a franchise. ➢ Deadline for Application Submission. A franchising authority must allow at least 20 days from the first date of published notice for the submission of franchise proposals. In other words, the deadline for submitting franchise proposals cannot be earlier than 20 days after the date that a jurisdiction's notice of intent to franchise was first published in a newspaper of general circulation. ➢ Contents of franchising proposal. The Minnesota Cable Act requires all franchise applications be signed in front of a notary and that certain information also be included in all franchise applications. Generally, the information includes: • Plans for channel capacity; • A statement of the television and radio broadcast signals for which permission to carry will be requested from the Federal Communications Commission; • A description of the proposed system design and planned operation; • Terms and conditions under which particular service is to be provided to governmental and educational entities; • A schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to be provided, and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of services; • A time schedule for construction of the entire system with the time sequence for wiring the various parts of the area requested to be served in the request for proposals; • A statement indicating the applicant's qualifications and experience in the cable communications field, if any; • An identification of the municipalities in which the applicant either owns or operates a cable communications system, directly or indirectly, or has outstanding franchises for which no system has been built; • Plans for financing the proposed system; • A statement of ownership detailing the corporate organization of the applicant; and • A notation and explanation of omissions or other variations with respect to the requirements of the proposal. r-1 LJ 4 ➢ Public hearing on franchise. Each franchising authority must hold a public hearing i before the franchising authority affording reasonable notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard with respect to all applications for a franchise. ➢ Award of franchise. Cable franchises may be awarded only by ordinance, after holding any necessary public hearings. A franchise may not be awarded until at least seven days after the public hearing. B. City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures The City adopted its "Policies and Procedures Governing Application, Review and Recommendations Regarding Grant of Competitive Cable Franchises," on May 5, 2000 ( "Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures "). See City Pet. 265879.1. The Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures adopted by the City supplement state and federal law. 1. City's Application Requirements To obtain an initial cable franchise, a written application containing all information required by the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures must be filed with the City. Under Section 4, Subd. 1 of the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures and state law, the application process is initiated by the City's publication of a Notice of Intent to Franchise that contains the specific requirements governing the submission cable franchise applications. According to the Notice of Intent to Franchise first published by the City on December 23, 2014, all franchise applications were to be filed with the Cable Officer no later than 4:00 p.m. on 40 January 20, 2015. 2. Contents of Application The City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedure largely reflects current State law requirements as listed above. In addition to the provision in State law, the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedure also require the following: • A statement that applicant seeks to construct a Cable System and to provide Cable Services within the City; • The name, address, address and telephone number of the individuals who may be contacted for further information; • Plans for the provision of institutional network capacity and services or other "in- kind" services and the terms, conditions and technical standards under which particular service is to be provided to governmental, educational, and other institutional entities; • A list of all institutions receiving institutional network service; • A schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to be provided, and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of services; • An agreement to pay the City a franchise fee in the same percentage of gross revenues as the incumbent provider(s); 9 • Indemnification language; and • an application fee. Section 7 Federal Law A. The Federal Cable Act As the FCC noted in its 621 Order, local franchising authorities may not unreasonably deny an additional competitive franchise to potential competitors who are ready and able to provide service in order "[t]o encourage more robust competition in the local video marketplace..." See 621 Order at ¶ 7; and 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). In awarding a franchise, a local franchising authority may establish construction schedules and construction requirements,5 and may require adequate assurances that an applicant: 1. Will provide adequate public, educational and governmental access channel capacity, facilities or financial support; and 2. Possesses the financial, technical and legal qualifications to provide cable service. 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4)(B) -(C). is A local franchising authority must also allow an applicant's cable system a reasonable period of time to become capable of providing cable service to all households in the franchise area. 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4)(A). Additionally, in awarding a franchise, a local franchising authority must assure that access to cable service is not denied to any group of potential residential cable subscribers because of the income of the residents of the local area in which such group resides. 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(3). Stated differently, a local franchising authority cannot allow a cable service provider to engage in economic redlining or "cherry- picking." B. The FCC's 621 Order — Competitive Cable Franchising In 2007, the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC" or the "Commission ") released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing competitive cable franchising. 6 It is sometimes referred to as the "621 Order" because it addresses the implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Federal Cable Act.7 Section 621(a)(1), among other things, prohibits franchising authorities from unreasonably refusing to award competitive cable franchises. 'See 47 U.S.C. § 552(a)(2). 6 See FN 3. 7 Section 621(a)(1) is codified at 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). 2 C. FCC 621 Order — Applicability to State Laws By its terms, the 621 Order applies only to new entrants.8 According to the FCC, the 621 Order does "not preempt state law or state level franchising decisions ... "9 Rather, the FCC "expressly limit[ed] ... [its] findings and regulations in this Order to actions or inactions at the local level where a state has not specifically circumscribed the LFA's authority. "10 In this regard, local laws, regulations, practices and agreements are preempted to the extent that they conflict with the FCC's rules or guidance adopted in the 621 Order and are not "specifically authorized by state law. "11 The FCC recently clarified the 621 Order in Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Order on Reconsideration (Rel. Jan. 21, 2015) ( "We clarify that those rulings were intended to apply only to the local franchising process, and not to franchising laws or decisions at the state level"). 12 D. 621 Order — Impact of Build -out Requirements on Competition and Consumers The FCC has concluded that in many cases, build -out requirements "deter competition and deny consumers a choice." 621 Order at ¶ 37. Additionally, build -out mandates may also may directly contravene the goals of Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which requires the FCC to "remov[e] barriers to infrastructure investment" to encourage the deployment of broadband services "on a reasonable and timely basis." Id. at ¶ 41. The FCC has recognized that "build -out issues are one of the most contentious between LFAs and prospective new entrants, and that build -out requirements can greatly hinder the deployment of new video and broadband services." 621 Order at ¶ 31. According to the FCC large incumbent local exchange carriers ( "LECs "), "view build -out requirements as the most significant obstacle to their plans to deploy competitive video and broadband services." Id. While an incumbent LEC already has telecommunications facilities deployed over large areas, it still must upgrade its existing plant to enable the provision of video service, which often requires a significant investment of capital. Id. at ¶ 38. The FCC also found in its 621 Order that build -out requirements can substantially reduce competitive entry." Id. at ¶ 32. According to the FCC, Build -out requirements can deter market entry because a new entrant generally must take customers from the incumbent cable operator, and thus must focus its efforts in areas where the take - rate will be sufficiently high to make economic sense. Because the second provider realistically cannot count on acquiring a share of the market similar to the incumbent's share, the second entrant cannot justify a large initial deployment. Rather, a new entrant 8 See, e.g., 621 Order at In 18 and 139. 9 Id. 1 126. 10 Id. at 11, n. 2: " 621 Order at ¶ 126. 'Z See Exhibit 11, at 17. 7 • • must begin offering service within a smaller area to determine whether it can reasonably ensure a return on its investment before expanding. 621 Order at ¶ 35 (Footnotes omitted). Therefore, Due to the risk associated with entering the video market, forcing new entrants to agree upfront to build out an entire franchise area too quickly may be tantamount to forcing them out of -- or precluding their entry into -- the business. 621 Order at 135 (Footnotes omitted). In analyzing the impact of build -out requirements on consumers, the FCC found that in many cases it adversely affects consumer welfare. 621 Order at ¶ 36. The Department of Justice commented that "imposing uneconomical build -out requirements results in less efficient competition and the potential for higher prices. Id. Non- profit research organizations the Mercatus Center and the Phoenix Center each concluded that build -out requirements imposed on competitive cable entrants only benefit an incumbent cable operator. Id. Historically, the greatest difference in pricing occurred, where there was wireline overbuild competition. In those situations, average monthly cable rates were 20.6 percent lower than the average for markets deemed noncompetitive. Id. E. FCC 621 Order - Federal Preemption of Unreasonable Build -Out Mandates 40 In the 621 Order, the FCC declared "it is unlawful for LFAs to refuse to grant a competitive franchise on the basis of unreasonable build -out mandates." 13 The 621 Order does not expressly prohibit full municipal build -out requirements, if they are reasonable (which will depend on local circumstances). Although the FCC did not definitively define what constitutes an "unreasonable build -out" mandate, it did list examples of both reasonable and unreasonable build -out requirements. a. Examples of Unreasonable Build -Out Requirements. The FCC's examples of unreasonable build -out mandates include: • requiring a new entrant to serve everyone in a franchise area before it has begun to serve anyone; • requiring facilities -based entrants, such as incumbent LECs, to build out beyond the footprint of their existing facilities before they have even begun to provide cable service; • requiring more of a new entrant than an incumbent cable operator by, for instance, requiring the new entrant to build out its facilities in a shorter period of time than that afforded to the incumbent; 0 " 621 Order at ¶ 89. 8 • requiring the new entrant to build out and provide service to areas • of lower density than those that the incumbent cable operator is required to build out to and serve; • requiring a new entrant to build out to and service buildings or developments to which the entrant cannot obtain access on reasonable terms or which cannot be reached using standard technologies; and • requiring a new entrant to build out to and provide service to areas where it cannot obtain reasonable access to and use of public rights -of -way. 14 b. Examples ofReasonable Build -Out Requirements. The FCC notes that it would seem reasonable for a local franchising authority to consider benchmarks requiring the new entrant to increase its build -out after a reasonable time, taking into account the new entrant's market success. 15 The FCC also opined that it would seem reasonable to establish build -out requirements based on a new entrant's market penetration. 16 F. 621 Order - PEG and Institutional Networks The 621 Order concludes that "LFAs may not make unreasonable demands of competitive applicants for PEG and I -Net'and that doing so constitutes an unreasonable refusal to award a franchise. 17 With regard to PEG channel capacity, the FCC determined that it would be unreasonable "to impose on a new entrant more burdensome PEG carriage obligations that it has imposed on the incumbent cable operator." 18 Overall, the FCC found that PEG support must be both "adequate and reasonable. "19 Adequacy is defined by the FCC as "satisfactory or sufficient. "20 The 621 Order does provide some examples of unreasonable PEG and Institutional Network support obligations, 21 including: Completely duplicative PEG and I -Net requirements; 22 Payment of the face value of an I -Net that will not be constructed; and Requirements that are in excess of the incumbent cable operator's obligations. 14 Id. at 1189 -90. 15 Id. at 189. 16 Id. " Id. at 1 110. ' $ Id. at 1114. 19 Id. at ¶ 115. 20 Id. at ¶ 112. 21 Id. at $ 119. 22 The 621 Order does appear to say that duplication is permissible if required for public safety purposes. Id. In addition, the FCC clarified that "an I -Net requirement is not duplicative if it would provide additional capability or functionality, beyond that provided by existing I -Net facilities." Id. L • According to the FCC, pro rata cost sharing of current (as opposed to future) PEG access obligations is per se reasonable. 23 In the event that pro rata cost sharing is utilized, PEG programming providers must permit a new entrant to interconnect with existing PEG video fees. 24 The new entrant must bear the cost of interconnection. G. FCC 621 Order — Local Level Playing Field Requirements Local level playing field requirements are generally preempted by the 621 Order. 2' This could mean that level playing field provisions (commonly called "Competitive Equity" in local Comcast franchises) included in existing cable franchise ordinances are preempted. Section 8 State and Local Law A. State Level Playing Field Statute While under federal law, a franchising authority may not unreasonably refuse to award an additional competitive franchise, Minnesota state law further restricts a franchising authority's ability to franchise with a level playing field provision that reads as follows: No municipality shall grant an additional franchise for cable service for an area included in an existing franchise on terms and conditions more favorable or less burdensome than those in the Isexisting franchise pertaining to: (1) the area served; (2) public, educational, or governmental access requirements; or (3) franchise fees. Nothing in this paragraph prevents a municipality from imposing additional terms and conditions on any additional franchises. Minn. Stat. § 23 8.08, subd. 1(b) (emphasis added). This language does not mean that the language or terms of a franchise must be the same between competitors. See WHLink, LLC v. City of Otsego, 664 N.W.2d 390, 396 (Minn. Ct. App. 2003) (more favorable or less burdensome interpreted as "substantially similar "). 23 621 Order at 1120. • 24 Id. zs Id. at ¶138. 10 B. The 5 -Year Build Statute 0 The Minnesota Cable Act also has a section that addresses franchise requirements for all local franchises. One of those provisions requires: (m) a provision in initial franchises identifying the system capacity and technical design and a schedule showing: (1) that construction of the cable communications system must commence no later than 240 days after the granting of the franchise; (2) that construction of the cable communications system must proceed at a reasonable rate of not less than 50 plant miles constructed per year of the franchise term; (3) that construction throughout the authorized franchise area must be substantially completed within five years of the granting of the franchise; and (4) that the requirement of this section be waived by the franchising authority only upon occurrence of unforeseen events or acts of God; See 238.085, Subd. 1(m) (emphasis added). It is the position of CenturyLink that the 5 -Year Build Statue is a barrier to entry and is preempted by the Federal Cable Act. See Exhibit 3 at IT 28 -31 and Section 11(C) below. • C. City Charter and Comcast Cable Franchise In addition to Federal and State law, local law also must be considered. The local laws applicable to the application for an additional franchise are the City Charter, the Cable Franchising Policy, and the current franchise with the incumbent franchised cable operator, Comcast. The City's Charter further authorizes the City Council to grant and regulate any lawful franchise. Minneapolis City Charter, Section 4.1(d). The Comcast cable franchise addresses competitive franchises in section 2.5, which states: If any laws, rules, regulations or government authorizations would allow a provider of multi - channel video programming or equivalent in the City's rights -of -way to provide multi - channel video programming or equivalent under less burdensome regulations or regulatory structure than Grantee is operating under, the obligations of this Agreement shall be modified to reflect such changes. n U 11 • Section 9 Issues Raised by the Public • A. Economic Redlining or Cherry Picking. The majority of the testimony at the Public Hearing and comments submitted to the City related to how CenturyLink would determine where it would provide cable service. For example, Pete Rhodes did not object to competition, but raised concerns about "fair and equitable distribution." See Exhibit 8 at p. 2. Similarly, Pastor Billy G. Russell supported broader competition, but was concerned about the service being available to only 30 percent of the City at the initial launch. See Exhibit 8 at p. 3. Pastor Russell supported "equitable service deployment" and adherence to "current franchise requirements." A group of "active advocates" echoed concern over the provision of service to 30% of the City. The group stated, "We feel that this type of an agreement would allow CenturyLink to decide who gets service and could leave behind those that might not have a lot of resources. We are also concerned that there is no guarantee this competitive option would ever be made available to the remaining 70% of the City." See Exhibit 8 at p. 5. The group urged the City to "continue with your commitment to equity." Another commenter was concerned that CenturyLink would not release information and locations for their rollout and that only CenturyLink believed that Federal law preempted state law. See Exhibit 8 at p. 9. Other commenters were supportive of CenturyLink's initial service offering to 30% of the City. As one commenter stated, "Even if CenturyLink is only [serving] 30[01o] of the homes to start it will still put Comcast on notice. Both companies competing means the consumer wins!" See Exhibit 8 at p. 11. Another commenter stated "it is about time that another company gives the public some choice" and urged the City to "grant [CenturyLink] a cable franchise even if only part of the City benefits to start with." See Exhibit 8 at p. 10. Mona Meyer on behalf of the Communications Workers of America ( "CWA ") supported bringing a "competitive alternative to the market." Andy Thompson, another commenter stated, CenturyLink should be "pressured to offer their service to all Minneapolis residents over time," but "incoming competition needs to be given the opportunity to gain a foothold before expanding." According to Mr. Thompson, "competition and choice will always be better for the consumer than no competition." Exhibit 8 at p. 7. 12 B. Culturally Diverse Programming Both Mr. Rhodes and Pastor Russell commented on the importance of culturally diverse programming. See Exhibit 8 at pp. 2 -3. C. Investment in the City Ms. Meyer on behalf of the CWA also commented on the benefits of increased investment in the City. According to Ms. Meyer, the City would see "greater investment in broadband services to homes and businesses..." See Exhibit 8 at p. 7. D. Job Growth in the City Ms. Meyer on behalf of the CWA also supported the CenturyLink application because it would bring "immediate job creation, and a vision for continued job creation through growth." See Exhibit 8 at p. 7. Mr. Thompson wrote, "I work at home... and I have no doubt this service would help my business day -to- day." E. Issues Raised By the Incumbent Franchised Cable Operator - Comcast A representative from Comcast submitted a letter into the record at the public hearing that raised the following issues: • • Concern "regarding whether and to what extent [CenturyLink] will agree to many of the i franchise obligations that have been required of Comcast." Exhibit 5 at p. 2. • An expectation that "the same level of due diligence and scrutiny that the City would apply -and has applied -to Comcast and its predecessors will also be applied to CenturyLink. Id. • Concern with "CenturyLink's build -out commitment that appears to stand in direct conflict with state law. Id. Comcast also indicated that CenturyLink's record in other markets raised a concern that CenturyLink's build -out will be based upon income considerations of the selected areas. Exhibit 5 at p. 3. At the public hearing, Mr. Campbell of CenturyLink challenged Comcast to submit evidence to prove that statement. 26 No proof of that statement was submitted. In raising one of the issues above, Comcast suggested that the competitive franchise application process should essentially be the same as prior Comcast renewals and transfers. See Exhibit 5 at p. 2. However, the FCC in its 621 Order found, [I]ncumbent cable operators' purported success in the franchising process is not a useful comparison in this case. Today's large MSOs obtained their current franchises by either renewing their preexisting agreements or by merging with and purchasing other 26 See Public Hearing at 35:15 mark. 13 • • incumbent cable franchisees with preexisting agreements. For two key reasons, their experiences in franchise transfers and renewals are not equivalent to those of new entrants seeking to obtain new franchises. First, in the transfer or renewal context, delays in LFA consideration do not result in a bar to market entry. Second, in the transfer or renewal context, the LFA has a vested interest in preserving continuity of service for subscribers, and will act accordingly. 621 Order at 129 (Footnotes omitted). The City is following the process set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 238.081. The statute does not include considering an incumbent's prior renewals and transfers. Section 10 Review of CenturyLink Cable Franchise Application The Cable Officer is the City officer responsible for reviewing cable franchise applications. Pursuant to the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures, the Cable Officer is required to prepare a report and recommendation (the "Report") within 15 days of the close of the public hearing on the franchise application. This report and recommendation will be filed timely with the City Clerk. The Cable Officer has reviewed the application and the entire public record, as well as all relevant factors and applicable federal, state and local standards for reviewing a cable franchise application. • 1. The City has substantially complied with state and City cable franchising application requirements. • Publication of Notice. The City fully complied with the state requirements (listed above) for publishing a notice of intent to franchise. See Exhibit 1 (Notice of Intent to Franchise, Finance & Commerce, Inc.). There were no objections to the City's publication of the notice of intent to franchise. Written Notice. In addition to publishing the notice of intent to franchise in one or more newspapers, the City also mailed copies of the notice of intent to franchise person it identified as being a potential candidate for a franchise. There were no objections to the City's provision of written notice to potential candidates for a cable franchise. Deadline for Application Submission. The City allowed more than 20 days from the first date of published notice for the submission of franchise applications. See Exhibit 1. There were no objections to the cable franchise application deadline set by the City. Public hearing on franchise. The City held a public hearing before the Ways and Means Committee on January 22, 2015, which afforded reasonable notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard with respect to the CenturyLink cable franchise application. No objections were made concerning the manner in which the City held the public hearing. 14 Award of franchise. In the event the City Council decides to enter into a franchise . agreement with CenturyLink in the future, the City must award the cable franchise by ordinance. In that event, while the City has held a public hearing on the cable franchise application, there will be a subsequent public hearing if a cable franchise agreement is agreed upon and a cable ordinance is introduced. A cable franchise may not be awarded until at least seven days after the public hearing on the cable franchise ordinance. City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures. The City fully complied with the City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures listed above. See Exhibit 1. No objection to the City's process was made at the public hearing. This report is filed to fulfill the requirement that the cable officer submit a report within 15 days of the close of the public hearing. See Ex. 8 (Policies) at Section 4, Subdivision 5. 2. CenturyLink's application substantially complies with state application requirements. Contents of franchising proposal. It was CenturyLink's responsibility to comply with all of the applications requirements in State Law. The application was submitted timely and signed before a notary. See Exhibit 2 (CenturyLink Cable Franchise Application). Upon review of the CenturyLink cable franchise application, CenturyLink has substantially complied with the following State application requirements without objection: • Plans for channel capacity. See Exhibit 2 at p. 1. • A statement of the television and radio broadcast signals for which permission to carry will be requested from the Federal Communications Commission. See Exhibit 2 at p. 1 and Exhibit 3 at ¶8. • A description of the proposed system design and planned operation. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 1 -2 and Exhibit 3 at IT 11 -16. • Terms and conditions under which particular service is to be provided to governmental and educational entities. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 2 -3 and Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 17 -22. • A schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to be provided, and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of services. See Exhibit 2 at p. 3 and Exhibit 3 at It 23- 27. • A statement indicating the applicant's qualifications and experience in the cable communications field, if any. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 3 -4 and Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 6, and 35 -36. • An identification of the municipalities in which the applicant either owns or operates a cable communications system, directly or indirectly, or has outstanding franchises for which no system has been built. See Exhibit 2 at p. 3 and Exhibit 3 at ¶ 37. • Plans for financing the proposed system. See Exhibit 2 at p. 5 and Exhibit 3 at 138. • A statement of ownership detailing the corporate organization of the applicant. See Exhibit 2 at p. 4 and Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 1 -6. • 15 • As required by the Minnesota Cable Act, CenturyLink provided a notation and explanation of omissions or other variations with respect to the requirements of the proposal. In particular, CenturyLink indicated that it would not provide information relating to the area - served application requirement because it believes Federal law preempts the State law 5 -year build out requirement. See Exhibit 3 at 1128-31 and Testimony of James Campbell of CenturyLink.27 There was documentary and testimonial evidence received into the record concerning CenturyLink's build -out of the City. See Exhibits 5 and 8. While some members of the public disagreed with CenturyLink's preemption conclusion and expressed concern about how CenturyLink will build -out its cable system if awarded a cable franchise by the City, there was no objection to CenturyLink explaining why it omitted build -out information in its cable franchise application. For purposes of complying with the state's application requirements, CenturyLink has adequately explained why it omitted a time schedule for construction of the entire system with the time sequence for wiring the various parts of the area requested to be served in. Therefore, it has substantially complied with the application filing requirements in state law. 3. CenturyLink's Application substantially complies with the City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures. The cable franchise application requirements of the City's Competitive Franchising • Policies and Procedures largely mirror the requirement found in state law. To the extent the requirements are the same or similar, CenturyLink has substantially complied with the City's application filing requirements listed above. CenturyLink also substantially complied with the following requirements: • A statement that applicant seeks to construct a Cable System and to provide Cable Services within the City. See Exhibit 2 at p. 1. • The name, address, address and telephone number of the individuals who may be contacted for further information. See Exhibit 2 at p. 1. • A statement of a form and substance acceptable to the City indemnifying the City fully against any claims or liabilities alleged as the result of the City's exercise of these Policies and Procedures including any such claims or liabilities alleged or asserted by the incumbent Cable Company. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 5 -6 • An application fee. See Exhibit 2. The Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures require an agreement to pay the City a franchise fee in the same percentage of gross revenues as the incumbent provider(s). CenturyLink's response did not contain such an agreement. Any franchise with CenturyLink must contain the same commitment to pay franchise fees as Comcast. • 2' Mr. Campbell's testimony on the 5 -Year Build Statute can be found at the 31:15 mark of the Public Hearing at: htips:// www. youtube.com/watch ?v= ZgCoFZanYgYY 16 The City's Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures also contain the following requirements. • Plans for the provision of institutional network capacity and services or other "in- kind" services and the terms, conditions and technical standards under which particular service is to be provided to governmental, educational, and other institutional entities; • A list of all institutions receiving institutional network service; When the City adopted the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures, the City believed the franchised cable operator had an institutional network cable franchise commitment. Following litigation and a 2006 Settlement Agreement, the City and the franchised cable operator agreed there would be no institutional network commitment in a renewed cable franchise, which was renewed in 2009. See City Pet. 271337 and City Code, Appendix H. Thus, the current cable franchise with Comcast has no institutional network commitment. CenturyLink has indicated that it will meet any incumbent franchise commitments related to service to governmental, and educational entities. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 2 -3 and Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 17 -22. 4. CenturyLink appears to have the Financial, Technical and Legal Qualifications to Provide Cable Service. While the City may review the financial, legal and technical qualifications of a franchise applicant, the FCC has indicated that in cases of the application for a LEC that already has a 40 certificate for public convenience and necessity from the state, an LFA need not spend a significant amount of time considering the fitness of such applicants to access public rights -of- way. See 621 Order at ¶ 23. This is because the LEC has already demonstrated its legal, technical, and financial fitness to be a provider of telecommunications services. Id. a. Financial Evaluation. As shown above, under 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4) the City may consider a franchise applicant's financial qualifications in determining whether to grant a' franchise. The parent company of the proposed franchisee appears financially qualified. CenturyLink, Inc. is the third largest telecommunications company in the United States with $18.0 Billion in annual operating revenue and free cash flow of $2.7 Billion. See Exhibit 2 at page 4 -5; and Exhibit 3 at para. 38. CenturyLink has further committed to making a $125 Million investment to bring cable television service to the Twin Cities. See Exhibit 2 at page 5. Provided that CenturyLink, Inc. can provide adequate assurances for the performance of the proposed franchisee, it appears that CenturyLink has the financial qualifications to operate a cable communications system in the City. Recently, the City required certain parent guarantees of GreatLand Connections in connection with the recent conditional approval of the cable franchise transfer from Comcast to GreatLand Connections. See 2015- R -XXX. b. Technical Evaluation. As shown above, under 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4), the Commission may consider whether CenturyLink has the necessary technical qualifications to construct, operate and maintain a cable system. CenturyLink has a demonstrated history of operating cable systems in 13 markets in the United Sates. See Exhibit 2 at p. 3. CenturyLink • 17 • has approximately 300,000 cable television subscribers and is capable of delivering it to approximately 2.3 Million homes. Id. CenturyLink's management team displays a wealth of experience in the cable and telecommunications industry. See Exhibit 3 at para. 6, 11 -16, and 35 -36. The application described a state -of -the -art cable system capable of reliably providing a panoply of cable services to subscribers. See Exhibit 2 at pp. 2 -3. According to CenturyLink, it "offers more channels in HD than any other MVPD nationally." Id. at p. 1. Based on the information contained in CenturyLink's application and its response to the request for information, it appears that CenturyLink has the technical qualifications to operate a cable communications system in the City. • C. Legal Evaluation. Both federal law and the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures permit the Commission to consider a cable franchise applicant's legal qualifications in the process of determining whether to grant a cable television franchise.28 The applicant appears legally qualified to hold a cable franchise in the City. The company is properly formed and authorized to do business in the state of Minnesota. See Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 1 -2. The company agrees to make all appropriate filings and preparations prior to offering cable service. Id. at ¶ 8. No adverse administrative, civil or criminal action has been taken against the applicant over the past five years. Id. at 9. While the applicant will operate the cable system, the facilities in the public rights -of- way will be owned by Qwest Corporation ( "QC" ). Id. at 10. Any cable franchise to applicant must contain adequate provisions ensuring compliance by QC of any franchise provisions related to the location, removal, relocation, testing, performance, and any other franchise requirement or applicable cable regulation relating to any portion of the cable communications system. Based on the information contained in CenturyLink's application and responses to the City's request for information, it appears that CenturyLink has the legal qualifications to operate a cable communications system in the City. Any franchise that is ultimately negotiated is subject to all restrictions under federal, state and local laws. d. Cable - Related Community Needs and Interests. No formal needs assessment is legally required in connection with an application for a competitive franchise. The City's cable - related needs and interests were addressed in the 2009 Comcast cable franchise renewal and recently updated through a 2015 Settlement Agreement. See City Code, Appendix H; and City Pet. 277975. The public testimony and comments identified certain additional needs and interests as shown above. See Section 10 above. Any franchise negotiated with CenturyLink should be substantially similar (but need not be identical) to the 2009 Comcast cable franchise, as amended, and address the concerns raised by the public at the public hearing consistent with the recommendations of this Report. 28 See 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4)(C) and Section 4, Subd. 2 of the Competitive Franchising Policies and Procedures. 18 Section 11 Cable Franchise Considerations In the event that the City Council directs City staff to negotiate a cable franchise with CenturyLink, the Cable Officer recommends that any franchise include, but certainly not be limited to, addressing the following issues. a. Economic Redlining or "Cherry Picking." The majority of the public comment from the public hearing centered on a concern that CenturyLink will choose to provide cable communications service to wealthy areas of the City, thereby discriminating based on the income of residents in the City. See Exhibit 8 and Public Hearing Testimony. There is nothing in the record to indicate that CenturyLink will do so. The CenturyLink application only indicates that its cable service "will be available to over thirty percent of the households in the City." See Exhibit 2 at p. 3. As CenturyLink stated at the Public Hearing, it is illegal to economically redline. See Public Hearing Testimony of Mr. Campbell. The Federal Cable Act does prohibit economic redlining. See 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(3). While economic redlining is illegal, it should be addressed in a cable franchise in a similar manner as the incumbent's cable franchise. Service discrimination is addressed in Section 1.3 of Comcast's Cable Franchise. See Appendix H of the Minneapolis Code. b. Diverse Programming. There were also public comments on the importance of culturally diverse programming provided by the franchised cable operators in the City. The City has limited authority on types of programming that it can require of a cable operator. Under Section 624 of the federal Cable Act, franchising authorities may establish requirements for video programming29 and may enforce any requirements contained within a cable franchise for "broad categories of video programming." See 47 U.S.C. § 544(b)(2)(B). Any franchise with CenturyLink should address the broad programming categories to ensure culturally diverse programming to the extent allowed. C. Franchise Area - Reasonable Build -Out of the City. As discussed in Section 8 above, the state of Minnesota has a statute that requires that all initial cable franchises contain a franchise provision requiring a 5 -year build. It is CenturyLink's position that the 5 -year Build Statute is preempted by the Federal Cable Act. See Exhibit 3 at ¶¶ 28 -31. While there is no court decision directly addressing whether the Federal Cable Act preempts the state 5 -Year Build Statute, CenturyLink does provide a good faith basis for its position. Id. CenturyLink is also willing to completely indemnify the City for any litigation concerning the grant of a cable franchise to CenturyLink. See Exhibit 2 at 5. With the 5 -Year Build Statute on one hand and federal preemption on the other, the City is left with a difficult choice. Does the City error on the side of caution and require a 5 -year build -out commitment from CenturyLink and risk thwarting a competing cable operator that will bring benefits to consumers and jobs and investment into the City? Or, does the City error on the side of competition? Litigation may be inevitable with either choice. 29 Subject to the limitations of 47 U.S.C. § 544(h). 19 • .7 C] Should the City direct staff to negotiate a cable franchise with CenturyLink, the cable franchise should contain fair and reasonable build -out requirements with the goal of CenturyLink providing competitive cable services throughout the entire City within a reasonable time and in an equitable manner. In doing so, the Federal Cable Act, the 5 -Year Build Statute, the FCC 621 Order, and any other applicable law should be considered. d. Level Playing Field Considerations. Comcast is the only commenter to specifically raise the state level playing field statute, Minnesota Statutes Section 238.08, as a concern. In the FCC's 621 Order, the FCC found: In many instances, level- playing -field provisions in local laws or franchise agreements compel LFAs to impose on competitors the same build -out requirements that apply to the incumbent cable operator. Cable operators use threatened or actual litigation against LFAs to enforce level-playing-field requirements and have successfully delayed entry or driven would -be competitors out of town. Even in the absence of level - playing -field requirements, incumbent cable operators demand that LFAs impose comparable build -out requirements on competitors to increase the financial burden and risk for the new entrant. 621 Order at ¶ 34 (Footnotes omitted). Regardless of the reason for raising the issue, any franchise should contain adequate provisions addressing the state level playing field statute. This should include provisions to provide cable service to all City residents over a reasonable time and reasonable circumstances (consistent with the build -out discussion above), similar public, educational, and governmental access requirements as Comcast, and the same franchise fee requirement as Comcast. See City Code, Appendix H, at §§ 2.1(z) -(aa) and 4. e. Compliance with City Charter and Comcast Cable Franchise In the event the City determines to grant a cable franchise to CenturyLink, the cable franchise must be granted by an ordinance. In the event that the cable franchise contains regulations or a regulatory structure that is less burdensome than Comcast is operating under, the franchise agreement with Comcast will be at risk of being modified to reflect the changes. However, local level playing field provisions may also be subject to federal preemption. See Section 7(G) above. 20 Section 12 Recommendation Based on the record developed by the City, including this Report, it is the Cable Officer's recommendation that the City (1) receive and file this Report; and (2) direct City staff to negotiate a cable communications franchise with CenturyLink consistent with this report. If the City accepts this recommendation, City staff will negotiate a cable franchise with CenturyLink. The City Council should issue a notice of intent to award a cable franchise by ordinance. Once a cable franchise ordinance is introduced, a public hearing on the ordinance will be scheduled before the Ways and Means Committee. The City Council may act on the cable franchise ordinance any time seven days following the public hearing on the cable franchise ordinance. After the public hearing, the City Council will need to decide whether to award a cable franchise by ordinance or to deny the award of a cable franchise. Additionally, the Council will need to make findings of fact in support of its decision. • 21 • AO' CenturyLink® • • DELIVERED VIA COURIER AND E -MAIL April 30, 2015 Scott H. Neal City Manager City of Edina 4801 W 50`h Street Edina, MN 55402 Patrick Haggerty Director of State Regulatory and Legislative Affairs Phone 651 - 312 -5630 Re: Application of Clwest Broadband Services, Inc. d /b /a CenturyLink for Cable Communications Services Franchise in Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Neal: In response to the City of Edina's published notice of Intent to Franchise and Request for Proposal, enclosed please find two copies of Qwest Broadband Services, Inc., d /b /a Centuryl-ink's notarized application for a cable communications franchise in the City of Edina, Minnesota. Trade Secret information has been redacted from the enclosed copies. Your counsel, Brian Grogan, has been served with one copy that contains Trade Secret information as well as a public version. The Company previously remitted a check in the amount of $10,000 payable to the City of Edina in full payment of its application fee. Please do not hesitate to contact me or any other designated representative of the Company if you have any questions. CenturyLink looks forward to working with and bringing facilities based video competition to the City of Edina. Cc: Brian Grogan PUBLIC DOCUMENT TRADE SECRET DATA HAS BEEN EXCISED V ry t my yours, Patrick Haggerty 200 South 51h Street, Room 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.centurylink.com F- w D U a U J CA o. CITY OF EDINA • APPLICATION OF QWEST BROADBAND SERVICES, INC. D /B /A CENTURYLINK FOR A COMPETITIVE CABLE FRANCHISE Qwest Broadband Services, Inc., d /b /a CenturyLink ( "CenturyLink ") respectfully files this application for a competitive cable communications franchise with the City of Edina pursuant to the City of Edina Notice and Request for Proposals dated March 17, 2015. Background: Overview of CenturyLink CenturyLink Improves Lives At CenturyLink, our vision is to improve the lives of our customers. Through our products and services, we help strengthen businesses and connect communities to each other and the world. CenturyLink's Unifying Principles We have established certain fundamental values that are the foundation for how we interact with our partners, our customers and with one another. We call these values our Unifying Principles, and they bring together our beliefs into a cohesive philosophy that guides our actions in all matters, including our greater social responsibility in the communities where we live and work. The Unifying Principles are Fairness, Honesty and Integrity, Commitment to Excellence, Positive Attitude, Respect, Faith and Perseverance. CenturyLink in Minnesota ¢ CenturyLink in Minnesota employs approximately 3,000 people with the QW majority of those jobs located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. More Q U than half of CenturyLink employees in the Twin Cities are represented by Ww the Communications Workers of America Union. This includes UZ approximately 500 network technicians, 200 of whom are being cross - w trained to support Prism. Success in the market will trigger hiring more W skilled technicians in the future to support Prism CenturyLink also employs Q � d Q approximately 100 network engineers in the Twin Cities who work in Fpartnership with the network operations team to plan, build and deploy service. CenturyLink's network operations team supports the new headend facility, located in Golden Valley. • QBSI / EDINA Application - April 306, 2015 Page 1 Employees in the Twin Cities also include business sales, marketing, regulatory affairs, public policy, customer service and administrative support. Employees are located across the Twin Cities in central office neighborhood locations and at three main corporate campus locations: • CenturyLink, 200 S. 5th Street, downtown Minneapolis • CenturyLink, 2800 Wayzata Blvd, Bryn Mawr, Minneapolis • CenturyLink, 70 W. 4Th Street, downtown St. Paul Many CenturyLink employees have worked with the company for decades experiencing early innovations as a telephone company and the current day transformation into a technologically - sophisticated service provider to local communities and Minnesota's largest companies. With a statewide payroll that exceeds $195 million each year, CenturyLink is a proud contributor to jobs and the economy in the state. CenturyLink in the Community, Sustainability and Commitment to Diversity CenturyLink is committed to strengthening and improving the communities it serves, not only through jobs, products and services, but also through • philanthropic support of local community agencies, events and initiatives. We focus our philanthropic and volunteer efforts on K -12 education and programs that support youth; technology- focused initiatives; and locally - driven efforts that strengthen communities and make them better places to live. Through our involvement in efforts ranging from environmental stewardship to community investment, we further our commitment to improve lives by being a good citizen and neighbor in the communities where we work and live. • Since 2007, the CenturyLink Clark M. Williams Foundation (previously Qwest Foundation) has awarded $800,000 to innovative Minnesota teachers working to improve STEM learning and access to technology in schools statewide. The Minnesota Business Partnership assists CenturyLink by administering the program. Together, we are helping to build awareness around STEM education and preparing Minnesota's future workforce for STEM careers. • CenturyLink awards scholarships in partnership with local organizations to advance the opportunities of their stakeholders. Scholarships recipient organizations include: • CenturyLink STEM scholarship via Minnesota High Tech association. QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30t, 2015 Page 2 • Pacer Center Excite Technology Camp for Girls scholarship. • • Minneapolis Urban League general education scholarships. • University of St. Thomas, ThreeSixty program scholarship. • CenturyLink helps provide a state -of- the -art fan experience at Target Field as the Official Communications Provider for the Minnesota Twins and Target Field. CenturyLink's sponsorship also includes working with the Twins and the Metro Area Library Association to support the summer reading program. • Through our Matching Time Grant program, Minnesota employees volunteering time to a non - profit agency can earn a CenturyLink Foundation grant for that organization. • Our employees can further their community support through our annual CenturyLink All Employee Volunteer Day, Employee Giving Campaign supporting the Greater Twin Cities United Way and our Annual Food Drive supporting Second Harvest Heartland. • We are committed to environmental sustainability through programs that include waste recycling, green information technology, and procurement policies and practices. • CenturyLink provides incentives for employees in certain communities to make use of public transit or green commuter programs. • Our Ethics and Compliance Program provides employees with • guidance in making ethical business decisions and provides mechanisms for employees to report concerns. • We have a Supplier Code of Conduct that establishes expectations for our contractors and vendors regarding ethical business practices. • CenturyLink's Privacy Policy protects our customers' information and keeps our customers informed about the information we collect and the choices they have regarding that information. • Diversity is celebrated and promoted through our Employee Resource Groups, recruiting, global supply chain and community outreach. CenturyLink Lifeline & Internet Basics CenturyLink participates in Lifeline, which provides certain discounts to qualified subscribers on monthly service. The program is designed to help low income households with needed phone services. Lifeline is available to qualifying customers in every U.S. state. Qualifications vary by state. Residents of American Indian and Alaskan Native tribal lands may qualify for up to an additional $25 of enhanced Lifeline support monthly. They may also qualify for the Link -Up program, which helps consumers pay the initial installation costs of getting telephone service. Link -Up provides a credit of up to $100 of the initial installation charges for tribal customers. QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 3 0 CITY OF EDINA APPLICATION OF QWEST BROADBAND SERVICES, INC. D /B /A CENTURYLINK FOR A COMPETITIVE CABLE FRANCHISE Qwest Broadband Services, Inc., d /b /a CenturyLink ( "CenturyLink ") respectfully files this application for a competitive cable communications franchise with the City of Edina pursuant to the City of Edina Notice and Request for Proposals dated March 17, 2015. Background: Overview of CenturyLink CenturyLink Improves Lives At CenturyLink, our vision is to improve the lives of our customers. Through our products and services, we help strengthen businesses and connect communities to each other and the world. CenturyLink's Unifying Principles • We have established certain fundamental values that are the foundation for how we interact with our partners, our customers and with one another. We call these values our Unifying Principles, and they bring together our beliefs into a cohesive philosophy that guides our actions in all matters, including our greater social responsibility in the communities where we live and work. The Unifying Principles are Fairness, Honesty and Integrity, Commitment to Excellence, Positive Attitude, Respect, Faith and Perseverance. CenturyLink in Minnesota CenturyLink in Minnesota employs approximately 3,000 people with the majority of those jobs located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. More than half of CenturyLink employees in the Twin Cities are represented by the Communications Workers of America Union. This includes approximately 500 network technicians, 200 of whom are being cross - trained to support Prism. Success in the market will trigger hiring more skilled technicians in the future to support Prism CenturyLink also employs approximately 100 network engineers in the Twin Cities who work in partnership with the network operations team to plan, build and deploy service. CenturyLink's network operations team supports the new headend facility, located in Golden Valley. • QBSI /EDINA Application -April 30th, 2015 Page 1 Employees in the Twin Cities also include business sales, marketing, regulatory affairs, public policy, customer service and administrative support. Employees are located across the Twin Cities in central office neighborhood locations and at three main corporate campus locations: • CenturyLink, 200 S. 5th Street, downtown Minneapolis • CenturyLink, 2800 Wayzata Blvd, Bryn Mawr, Minneapolis • CenturyLink, 70 W. 41h Street, downtown St. Paul Many CenturyLink employees have worked with the company for decades experiencing early innovations as a telephone company and the current day transformation into a technologically - sophisticated service provider to local communities and Minnesota's largest companies. With a statewide payroll that exceeds $195 million each year, CenturyLink is a proud contributor to jobs and the economy in the state. CenturyLink in the Community, Sustainability and Commitment to Diversity CenturyLink is committed to strengthening and improving the communities it serves, not only through jobs, products and services, but also through philanthropic support of local community agencies, events and initiatives. • We focus our philanthropic and volunteer efforts on K -12 education and programs that support youth; technology- focused initiatives; and locally - driven efforts that strengthen communities and make them better places to live. Through our involvement in efforts ranging from environmental stewardship to community investment, we further our commitment to improve lives by being a good citizen and neighbor in the communities where we work and live. • Since 2007, the CenturyLink Clark M. Williams Foundation (previously Qwest Foundation) has awarded $800,000 to innovative Minnesota teachers working to improve STEM learning and access to technology in schools statewide. The Minnesota Business Partnership assists CenturyLink by administering the program. Together, we are helping to build awareness around STEM education and preparing Minnesota's future workforce for STEM careers. • CenturyLink awards scholarships in partnership with local organizations to advance the opportunities of their stakeholders. Scholarships recipient organizations include: ■ CenturyLink STEM scholarship via Minnesota High Tech association. • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 2 • Pacer Center Excite Technology Camp for Girls scholarship. ■ Minneapolis Urban League general education scholarships. • University of St. Thomas, ThreeSixty program scholarship. • CenturyLink helps provide a state -of -the -art fan experience at Target Field as the Official Communications Provider for the Minnesota Twins and Target Field. CenturyLink's sponsorship also includes working with the Twins and the Metro Area Library Association to support the summer reading program. • Through our Matching Time Grant program, Minnesota employees volunteering time to a non - profit agency can earn a CenturyLink Foundation grant for that organization. • Our employees can further their community support through our annual CenturyLink All Employee Volunteer Day, Employee Giving Campaign supporting the Greater Twin Cities United Way and our Annual Food Drive supporting Second Harvest Heartland. • We are committed to environmental sustainability through programs that include waste recycling, green information technology, and procurement policies and practices. • CenturyLink provides incentives for employees in certain communities to make use of public transit or green commuter programs. • Our Ethics and Compliance Program provides employees with is guidance in making ethical business decisions and provides mechanisms for employees to report concerns. • We have a Supplier Code of Conduct that establishes expectations for our contractors and vendors regarding ethical business practices. • CenturyLink's Privacy Policy protects our customers' information and keeps our customers informed about the information we collect and the choices they have regarding that information. • Diversity is celebrated and promoted through our Employee Resource Groups, recruiting, global supply chain and community outreach. CenturyLink Lifeline & Internet Basics CenturyLink participates in Lifeline, which provides certain discounts to qualified subscribers on monthly service. The program is designed to help low income households with needed phone services. Lifeline is available to qualifying customers in every U.S. state. Qualifications vary by state. Residents of American Indian and Alaskan Native tribal lands may qualify for up to an additional $25 of enhanced Lifeline support monthly. They may also qualify for the Link -Up program, which helps consumers pay the initial installation costs of getting telephone service. Link -Up provides a credit of • up to $100 of the initial installation charges for tribal customers. QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 3 CenturyLink supports the Federal Communications Commission's goal of • bringing high -speed Internet to economically- disadvantaged households. We work with nonprofit partners throughout our state to engage communities in the CenturyLink Internet Basics program which provides qualifying low- income Minnesotans service at a reduced rate. CenturyLink has conducted training programs and awareness building around Internet Basics through the Minneapolis Urban League. We have created partnerships with the Minneapolis Public Schools and PC's for People to distribute hundreds of computers to low - income families and provide information to families on the opportunities offered through CenturyLink Internet Basics. CenturyLink, the applicant, is a Delaware corporation, in good standing and authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota. The following responds directly to the requested information set forth in the Request for Proposals: A. Plans for channel capacity, including both the total number of channels capable of being energized in the system and the number of channels to be energized immediately. Applicant's underlying switched digital IP based technology allows for an almost unlimited channel capacity. While a final channel lineup has not been finalized at this time, please see "Exhibit A - channel lineup and programming packages" from another jurisdiction CenturyLink offers Prism"" service. CenturyLink will provide the Commission with a copy of the actual channel lineup prior to launching service. It should be noted that currently CenturyLink offers more channels in HD than any other MVPD nationally. It also provides a robust library of Video on Demand content. B. A statement of the television and radio broadcast signals for which permission to carry will be requested from the Federal Communications Commission. Franchisee will make all appropriate filings and preparations prior to the turn up of its video service including Cl) filing a community registration with the FCC via FCC Form 322; (2) providing notice to local broadcasters and requesting either must -carry or retransmission consent election. In the Twin Cities area, Applicant will negotiate retransmission agreements with the following stations: KARE, KMSP, KSTC, KSTP, WCCO, WFTC, and WUCW. The following stations will be carried via a must carry election by the station: KPXM and KTCA. And (3) registration of any antennas required to provide service. 0 QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 4 • In its existing markets, Franchisee complies with many additional federal requirements in providing its Prism"' service, including all of the FCC requirements applicable to multichannel video programming distributors (such as equal employment opportunity and set -top box requirements), the FCC requirements applicable to EAS participants that are wireline video service providers, other FCC requirements applicable to provision of Prism'" (such as receive -only earth station license requirements and annual regulatory fees for IPTV providers), and the Copyright Office requirements for cable systems filing semi - annual copyright statements of accounts and paying statutory license fees. Franchisee does not file an FCC Form 327 relating to CARS microwave facilities because Franchisee does not use such facilities in connection with the provision of Prism"'. Similarly, Franchisee does not file FCC Form 320 and FCC Form 321 as they relate to the use of aeronautical frequencies that are not applicable to the IPTV technology. C. A description of the proposed system design and planned operation, including at least the following items: Description of the Technology and Infrastructure: CenturyLink will deploy its cable communications service, PrismT", over facilities owned by an affiliated company, Qwest Corporation, d /b /a CenturyLink (QC). Prism is a switched digital service and is Ethernet based (it is not a QAM based, broadcast service). The fact that the service is switched digital and Ethernet based enables CenturyLink to offer unique features and functions, e.g., warp channel change, not generally available over more traditional cable systems, as more fully detailed below. Currently, two network architectural designs are used to deliver Prism'" to subscribers: fiber to the node (FTTN) and fiber to the premises (FTTP), but the quality of the cable communications service is of the same high, technical quality regardless of the underlying network architecture. For FTTN, CenturyLink deploys fiber from a serving central office to a remote terminal in a neighborhood. The remote terminal houses the electronics (currently VDSL2) and such electronics create a broadband stream to individual addresses of up to 40Mpbs (80Mpbs if using pair bonding) over a copper subloop. For FTTP, there is fiber connectivity from the serving central office to a distinct address /location via an optical loop terminal (OLT) and this fiber connection will support broadband speeds of up to One Gbps. A set -top box is required for each television in a home to receive Prism'. CenturyLink recently introduced a wireless set top box which enables the end user to move Prism"' to any location such as the patio • or garage. QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 5 QC is the traditional telecommunications provider in the City of Edina. It • has and will continue to pull all necessary permits and comply with all local rules, codes and ordinances associated with access to and presence in the public rights of way. Please see Exhibit B (TRADE SECRET). 1. The general area for location of antenna and headend, if known; CenturyLink has two "super head ends ", one located in Columbia, Missouri and one in Littleton, Colorado and each super head end has a satellite "farm" used to download national content. These two super head ends provide redundancy, i.e., should an emergency interrupt service at one super head end, and then the other head end will be used to provide the national content. The national content is encoded and then deployed over diverse 10 Gig fiber circuits to the local head where the local content, including public, educational and government access channels, is inserted for ultimate delivery to end users. The City of Edina will be served out of the super head end is in Columbia, Missouri and the local head end will be located in Golden Valley, Minnesota. CenturyLink will pick up the local broadcast signals via fiber circuits and will also capture those signals by antennae located at the local head end as a back -up, precautionary • measure. 2. The schedule for activating cable and two -way capacity; While an exact launch date has yet to be determined, we are working diligently to complete all necessary work and required testing and operational readiness reviews to offer service to customers upon successful execution of a Franchise Agreement. Applicant will meet with Commission and appropriate member jurisdictions to share the actual launch date when it becomes finalized. 3. The type of automated services to be provided; As noted above, we have attached a sample channel line up from another market. This illustrates the vast selection of content available to subscribers. Because our system is IP based, we offer unique applications available via the television set such as access to Picasa. In addition, search and streaming services are available which enable viewers to search for the cheapest gasoline within a specified area or to stream selected stock market quotes. We also have an ever increasing video on demand library. PrismTM is a state of the art offering and its features and functions also include, but are • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 6 • not limited to: (1) whole home DVR; (2) warp speed channel change; (3) find -it fast navigation, (4) multi -view (4 shows on one screen); (5) personal media sharing; (6) interactive news and information dashboard; (7) Prism"' on the Go (select content available over mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets); and (8) advanced parental controls. By going to the following URL, you can "experience" the features and functions of Prism'"' through a short demonstration: http:// www. centurylink .com/prismty /ffindex.html. 4. The number of channels and services to be made available for access cable broadcasting; and Applicant will carry the same number of PEG stations as the incumbent. Further, Applicant is willing to carry any of the PEG stations in High Definition ( "HD ") format if the entity originating the signal provides that signal to Applicant in HD. Applicant will down convert the HD signals to standard definition ( "SD ") for those customers who may not subscribe to an HD package. S. A schedule of charges for facilities and staff assistance for access cable broadcasting; Franchisee will make all franchised cities' access channels available to its • subscribers. For purposes of acquiring the signal, Franchisee will pick up the particular City's Access Channel signals at the point(s) of origination via a fiber facility and transport such content back to the local VSO for insertion in the channel lineup. At the point(s) of origination, Franchisee will need rack space and power for its equipment to receive the signal(s) handed off by the City to Franchisee. Franchisee will pay for all facilities and equipment located on its side of the demarcation point where the City will hand off its content to Franchisee and as is industry practice, the City will be responsible for all equipment on its side of the demarcation point. • One of the features available on Prism" is "multi- view" -- we create a single channel /landing page for a category of shows, e.g., news, and make all the news channels available using picture in a picture technology. The end user can then click on the channel he or she wants to watch or watch four simultaneously. You can see a quick demonstration of this feature by clicking on the following URL: http: / /www.centurylink.com /prismtv/ #prism -tv- virtual- test - drive.html. We will use this same technology to create a "multi- view" (also referred to as "mosaic ") for the member Cities' Access Channels. In other words, we will work with the member cities to assign a channel placement /number for the QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 7 Access Channel mosaic so that all of the franchised member cities' Access . Channels will be available on the "landing page" and an end user merely needs to click on the specific channel /picture in a picture to be seamlessly taken to the selected Access Channel in full screen view. Because each of the Access Channels has its own dedicated channel assignment, the channels are offered in the same video and audio quality as all other channels and can be recorded if so desired by an end user. Further, access to the member cities' Access Channels will not be limited to residents of a particular City. Rather, Prism'" subscribers throughout the area will have access to the various member cities' Access Channels and City residents will have access to other Cities' or Cable Commissions' Access Channels. This opens a vast array of viewing options for citizens. Franchisee is willing to make all the franchised member cities' access channels available in high definition if the City hands them to Franchisee in that format. If so, Franchisee will down convert all such HD Access Channels to SD so they can be viewed by any end user not capable of receiving HD signals. As this relates to the multi -view screen for the Access Channels, Applicant's middleware will automatically know if a subscriber needs to see the channel in SD or HD and will automatically route the end user to the channel with the proper format. With respect to video on demand, Franchisee will offer the cities a specified Is amount of space on its VOD servers, as will be specified in the franchise. This will enable viewers to go into the VOD library and to view, on an on- demand basis, any Access Channel content that the City has handed to Franchisee for storage on its VOD servers. Such VOD content hand off has a common industry standard which will be shared with the City when the terms of the franchise are negotiated and finalized. D. Terms and conditions under which particular service is to be provided to governmental and educational entities. Applicant will provide at no charge expanded basic service to all government buildings, schools, and public libraries located within its service footprint so long as those locations are capable of receiving service from Applicant and no other cable provider is providing service at such locations. 0 QBSI /EDINA Application —April 30th, 2015 Page 8 E. A schedule of proposed rates in relation to the services to be provided and a proposed policy regarding unusual or difficult connection of services. Final rates have yet to be determined, please see "Exhibit C- sample Prism "' rates" which are offered here for illustrative purposes. CenturyLink will provide Prism service to all qualified households within seven days. CenturyLink does not have "non- standard" installation, i.e., the provision of service at an additional construction cost to the subscriber. Qualification for Prism'" service is purely a technical issue — it is not possible to pay an additional amount to qualify for the service. F. A time schedule for construction of the entire system with the time sequence for wiring the various parts of the area requested to be served. Applicant is still finalizing its initial footprint for the deployment of cable services within the City of Edina service area. Applicant's planned deployment is highly confidential. Pursuant to an executed franchise agreement(s), Applicant will meet regularly with the City and the Commission to discuss where service is available and any plans for additional deployment. Applicant is the second entrant into the wireline video market in the City of Edina. As a second entrant, investment in and expansion of • Applicant's Cable System should be driven by market success, and not a contractual requirement for ubiquitous coverage. The following sets forth some critical background with respect to deployment of both telecommunications and cable infrastructure. Initially, local telephone companies were granted monopolies over local exchange service in exchange for taking on a provider of last resort obligation- a duty to provide service - to customers in its service territory. Similarly, with respect to video services, the City of Edina has given the incumbent video provider (and its predecessors) a monopoly over facilities based video. In exchange for making the capital investment to deploy facilities, the incumbent cable company got 100 percent of the customers who wanted cable television. Subsequently, with respect to telephone services, the federal and local governments effectively eliminated the local telephone monopolies and fostered robust competition. It should be noted that in doing so, the telecom second entrant had absolutely no obligation to build any facilities or to serve any particular location(s) at all. As the FCC noted, imposing build -out requirements on new entrants in the telecommunications industry would constitute a barrier to entry (13 FCC Rcd 3460, 1997). Cable companies were free to enter the telecom market on terms that made business and 40 economic sense to them. This very environment was the catalyst for robust QBSI /EDINA Application -April 30th, 2015 Page 9 wireless and wireline competition and the proliferation of higher broadband speeds. Congress became concerned about the lack of competition in the video world and in 1992 amended federal law to prohibit a local franchising authority from "unreasonably[y] refus[ing] to award an additional competitive franchise." 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) provides a direct avenue for federal court relief in the event of such an unreasonable refusal. 47 U.S.C. § 555(a) and (b). Until the advent, however, of state statutes granting statewide cable franchises without a mandatory build requirement (e.g., Florida) or progressive cities willing to grant competitive franchises, cable monopolies continued to the detriment of consumers and competition. Level playing field requirements are just one example of barriers to competitive entry erected by cities at the behest of the cable monopolies. Courts have ruled, however, that "level playing field" provisions do not require identical terms for new entrants. See, for example, Insight Communications a City of Louisville, 2003 WL 21473455 (Ky. Ct. App. 2003), where the court found: There will never be an apple -to -apple comparison for Insight and other franchisee simply because Insight is the incumbent which in its own right and through its predecessors has been the exclusive provider of cable • services in the City of Louisville for almost thirty years. No new cable franchisee can ever be in the same position as a thirty-year veteran. See also, In Cable TV Fund 14A Ltd. v. City of Naperville (1997 WL 209692 (N.D. Ill); and New England Cable Television Assn, Inc. v. Connecticut DPUC 717 A.2d 1276 (1998). In sharp contrast to the monopoly provider, a second entrant faces a significant capital outlay with absolutely no assurance of acquiring customers; rather, it must compete with the monopoly incumbent and win each and every customer over. As Professor Thomas Hazlett of George Mason University has explained, "[i]ncumbents advocate build -out requirements precisely because such rules tend to limit, rather than expand, competition." The federal Department of Justice has also noted that "...consumers generally are best served if market forces determine when and where competitors enter. Regulatory restrictions and conditions on entry tend to shield incumbents from competition and are associated with a range of economic inefficiencies including higher production costs, reduced innovation, and distorted service choices." (Department of Justice Ex Parte, May 10, 2006, FCC MB Dkt. 05 -311). i QBSI /EDINA Application — April 30th, 2015 Page 10 The fact is that the incumbent cable provider has (1) an established market position; (2) all of the cable customers; and (3) an existing, in -place infrastructure. These disparate market positions make imposing a build -out requirement on a competitive entrant bad public policy. Under the guise of "level playing field" claims, incumbent cable operators seek to require new entrants to duplicate the networks the incumbents built as monopolies, knowing that such a requirement will greatly reduce, if not eliminate, the risk of competitive entry. In 2007, the FCC issued its findings with respect to facilities based video competition and held as follows: (1) with respect to level playing field requirements, the FCC stated that such mandates "unreasonably impede competitive entry into the multichannel video marketplace by requiring local franchising authorities to grant franchises to competitors on substantially the same terms imposed on the incumbent cable operators (Para. 138); and (2) with respect to mandatory build out, the FCC held that "an LFA's refusal to grant a competitive franchise because of an applicant's unwillingness to agree to unreasonable build out mandates constitutes an unreasonable refusal to award a competitive franchise within the meaning of Section 621(a)(1) [47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)]." Those two FCC holdings alone should put this entire matter to rest - level • playing field requirements and unreasonable mandatory build requirements are barriers to competitive entry in the cable market and violate the federal Cable Act and the FCC's order. Minnesota, however, codified its requirements in a state law and the FCC expressly declined to "preempt" state laws addressing the cable franchising process. It is clear, however, that the FCC did not intend to protect the Minnesota statute which mandates the imposition of barriers to entry on each and every local franchising authority. As various providers were trying to enter the competitive cable market and encountering barriers such as level playing field requirements and mandatory build out provisions, many states passed statutes to facilitate competitive entry and to prevent local franchising authorities from erecting barriers to entry. Such laws were passed in 26 states including Florida, Missouri and North Carolina, where CenturyLink has taken advantage of the streamlined process to enter a market without a mandatory build obligation. These laws have facilitated competitive entry as evidenced, for example, by the presence of four facilities based competitors in the Orlando, Florida market, including CenturyLink and Comcast. As such, these state laws are aligned and not in conflict with the FCC's and Congress' policies for promoting competition in the video distribution market. • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 11 Minnesota's cable law, however, is quite the opposite. Minnesota's cable act dates back to the 1970s and directs each local franchising authority to impose not only a level playing field across a broad range of issues (many of which Franchisee does not oppose), but also a five year mandatory build out requirement. Both of these provisions have been deemed to be barriers to entry by the FCC. The incontrovertible fact is that the law has been extremely successful in barring cable communications competition in the City of Edina: The City of Edina has not experienced any facilities based competition because of the barriers to entry Minnesota codified in Chapter 238. In support of this position, that the FCC's 2007 Order preempts Minn. Stat. Chapter 238, Franchisee notes the following: • Conflict preemption: State law may be preempted without express Congressional authorization to the extent it actually conflicts with federal law where state law "stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress" English v. General Elec. Co., 496 U.S. 72,79 (1990). Whether state law constitutes a sufficient obstacle is a matter of judgment to be informed by examining the federal statute as a whole and identifying its purpose and intended effects. Crosby v. Nat'l Foreign Trade Council, 530 U.S. 363,372 (2000). • Minn. Stat. § 238.08 mandates terms that each municipality must implement in granting a new or renewed cable franchise. • Minn. Stat. § 238.084 sets forth the required contents of a franchise ordinance and sets forth very precise requirements in an initial franchise about the build: commence build within 240 days; must construct at least 50 plant miles per year; construction throughout the franchise area must be substantially completed within 5 years of granting the franchise; and these requirements can be waived by the franchising authority only upon occurrence of unforeseen events or acts of God. • Section 621(a)(1) initially gave local authorities the authority to grant franchises, but this broad grant resulted in exclusive franchises /monopolies. Congress "believe [d] that exclusive franchises are contrary to federal policy... which is intended to promote the development of competition. H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 102- 862, at 77 (1992) • Legislative history clearly supports that Congress was focused on fostering competition when it passed the 1992 Act. Qwest Broadband Servs. Inc. v. City of Boulder, 151 F. Supp. 1236, 1244 (D. Colo. 2001). 0 QBSI /EDINA Application -April 30th, 2015 Page 12 • In its 2007 order, the FCC found that "an LFA's refusal to grant a competitive franchise because of an applicant's unwillingness to agree to unreasonable build out mandates constitutes an unreasonable refusal to award a competitive franchise within the meaning of Section 621(a)(1)." The FCC order, however, targeted local and not state laws. • Arguably, the Minnesota build requirements set forth in Section 238.084(m) are in conflict with Section 621(a)(1) and are, therefore, preempted. In the Boulder case, the court applied Section 621's prohibition on unreasonable refusals to grant franchises to find conflict preemption where local rules required voter approval for any new franchises. • The mandatory build out in the Minnesota statute could be considered a de facto "unreasonable refusal" to grant a franchise and thus conflict with the pro- competition purpose set forth in 621(a) (1). • In upholding the FCC's ruling, the Sixth Circuit stated that "while the [FCC] characterized build out requirements as 'eminently sensible' under the prior regime in which cable providers were granted community -wide monopolies, under the current, competitive regime, these requirements 'make entry so expensive that the prospective ... • provider withdraws its application and simply declines to serve any portion of the community." Alliance for Cmty Media v. FCC, 529 F.3d 763, 771 (6th Cir. 2008). • The FCC ruling targeted local rules and actions and the FCC refrained from preempting state regulation because it lacked "a sufficient record to evaluate whether and how such state laws may lead to unreasonable refusals to award additional competitive franchises." FCC Cable Franchising Order (FCC 06 -180, at n.2 & ¶ 126). That is not to say, however, that upon full consideration, the FCC would not find the Minnesota mandatory build requirements to constitute an unreasonable refusal under Section 621. o The franchising laws which were being enacted about the time of the FCC order facilitated competitive entrants into the facilities based video market. o In sharp contrast, the Minnesota statutes mandates individual cities and commissions to include onerous build out schedules which, standing alone, would run afoul of the FCC's order. It should also be noted that at least two cities in Minnesota have chosen to award competitive franchises to second entrants without satisfying all the mandates of Chapter 238. See Mediacom Minnesota, LLC v. City of Prior Lake, • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 13 Minn. Ct. of Appeals, A09 -1379 (Unpublished decision, Filed June 22, 2010). In October 2014, the City of Owatonna awarded a competitive franchise to a second provider, and the franchise did not contain the five year build requirement set forth in Chapter 238. Rather, it contained a market success model expressly endorsed by the FCC. The competitor will provide service to 25 percent of the City of Owatonna and will have no further obligation to enable the provision of cable communications services until 48 percent of households in the footprint subscribe to its service. Finally, nothing in the FCC's Order on Reconsideration released in January of this year alters the above analysis. G. A statement indicating the applicant's qualifications and experience in the cable communications field, if any. CenturyLink has been offering Prism'' since 2008, when it initially launched its service in Lacrosse, Wisconsin, and has continued to expand its Prism'" footprint since that time. Prism'"' is currently available in 14 markets. The attached Exhibit D is a list of the jurisdictions in which CenturyLink offers Prism'"" pursuant to either statewide franchise statutes or locally negotiated, competitive franchises. In addition, the Company offers an analog product in smaller markets in Wisconsin and Iowa. CenturyLink has upgraded and /or deployed new facilities, including fiber to the premises, so that it is capable of offering service to over 2.4 million homes. CenturyLink has approximately 240,000 Prism'"" customers and continues to bring on new subscribers daily. Tyler Middleton is the Vice President of Operations for Minnesota. His team includes more than 500 technicians, 200 of whom are being cross - trained to install and support Prism. There is a wide array of employees performing various functions in support of PrismTM' in the Twin Cities, including approximately 100 engineers who will be working under Mr. Middleton's leadership to design and support the infrastructure that enables Prism'". Trent Clausen is the Vice President of Construction for the Midwest Region. He has held a variety of leadership positions in the network organization over the past 16 years, including positions managing and leading capital planning, field construction, local engineering, dispatch operations, and installation and maintenance operations. His team successfully upgraded the network in Omaha to support the launch of Prism'"' there in 2013 and will be responsible, working closely with Mr. Middleton's team, to construct the network to support Prism'"' in Minneapolis and the Twin Cities metropolitan area. • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 14 There are three essential corporate divisions which support the provision of Prism'' to end users: Global Operations and Shared Services, Global Markets and Product Development and Technology. The Global Operations and Shared Services organization is led by Executive Vice President Maxine Moreau. A 30 -year veteran of telecommunications, Maxine Moreau brings a depth of knowledge and experience in network services, operations, IT and process improvement to her role as Executive Vice President of Global Operations and Shared Services. She is responsible for operational excellence through the end -to -end planning, engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of CenturyLink's global network, as well as regional operations and hosting data centers. Moreau oversees network enablement that currently provides commercial 100Gbps services to businesses for high- bandwidth needs as well as the deployment of 1Gbps fiber networks in certain markets, including Minneapolis for both consumer and business customers. Members of her team will staff the VSO in Golden Valley. Maxine Moreau's team is responsible for the engineering, planning and deployment of all network infrastructure, including the infrastructure on a national and local basis for the delivery of Prism'". In addition, organizations responsible for data and video operations report up to 10 Maxine. These centers, from an operational perspective, constantly monitor and repair, if necessary, the entire network including the facilities used in the provision of Prism''. The Global Markets organization is led by President Karen Puckett. With 30 years of telecommunications experience, Karen Puckett is an industry veteran with proven success in the integration of complex operations, the achievement of industry - leading financial and operational performance, and the creation of a company culture that is focused on accountability, innovation and growth. As CenturyLink's Chief Operating Officer, Puckett is responsible for the company's financial and operational performance in the business and consumer segments. She leads marketing, sales, service delivery, care and customer experience initiatives for all business and consumer customers and the implementation of the local operating model in the company's local service areas in 37 states. Puckett has been at the forefront of CenturyLink's transformation from a local telephone exchange company serving rural and mid -sized markets to an industry leader in advanced communications services with customers throughout the United States and overseas. Her visionary leadership has been instrumental in the company's ability to thrive in the new arenas of cloud, data hosting and managed services, as well as facilities based switched digital video service while maintaining its focus on operational excellence and financial strength. • QBSI /EDINA Application -April 30th, 2015 Page 15 Puckett led the 2001 companywide realignment to the local operating model, placing decision making closer to the customer and making the company more responsive to the marketplace. The model has consistently resulted in financial and operational improvements as CenturyLink has acquired new markets. As it relates to Prism, Karen Puckett's organization owns the customer experience in terms of sales and repairs. There are five call centers which provide support for consumer sales, including Prism'"'. These centers are located in Sioux City, Iowa; Idaho Falls, Idaho; Boise, Idaho; Midvale, Utah; and Phoenix, Arizona. The Product Development and Technology organization is led by Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Aamir Hussain. Hussain is an experienced senior technology executive with more than 23 years of proven success in the implementation of global technology operations, operationalization of complex technology, infrastructures, and business solutions while driving capital cost efficiencies in the business. Hussain and his team are responsible for the design and delivery of next generation products, services and technologies critical to achieving CenturyLink's strategic growth priorities, including Prism. Hussain has a diverse background in data, security, voice, video and wireless technologies. Prior to joining CenturyLink, he held senior leadership roles at Liberty Global, is Covad, TELUS and Qwest. Hussain sits on several startup and non - profit boards, is technical advisor to technology companies and holds 11 patents in Telecommunications. In addition, he has completed leadership, innovation and strategy training from Harvard, the INSEAD institute in France and the International School of Business Management in Switzerland. Aamir's team is charged with constantly working to implement new technologies and innovations to enhance the customer experience across the entire suite of CenturyLink products, including Prism. Glenn Garbelman serves as the Vice President of the Video Operations at CenturyLink, and is based in Monroe, Louisiana. He currently has day -to- day operational responsibility for all video services, which is currently serving 240,000 PrismT"' customers with more than 150 employees on his team. Prior to joining CenturyLink, he was part of a large communications company that successfully launched and supported IPTV video in over 70 markets throughout the United States. He has more than 25 years of experience in the industry with the last 10 focused on video products and services over an I network. Sandeep Bhalla is the Director of Video Technical Operations. Responsible for the daily operations of CenturyLink Video Services, Sandeep oversees the QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 16 Video Operations staff and ensures the integrity of operations and processes. With 19 years of technical experience and 10 years of video, Sandeep has served as a CenturyLink representative to national and international forums related to next generation video services. Prior to joining CenturyLink, Sandeep was a Manager of Head End Implementation for a large communications company. Sandeep holds a BA from the University of California Berkley. Charles Becker is the Manager Video Operations IPTV responsible for all headends based out of Denver, Colorado. The Video Headend Team is responsible for the operation and acquisition of all video content served by the Prism platform both local and national. The team maintains and operates 17 headends located in 13 states across the country. This team supports new market builds, preventative maintenance, outage resolution and proactively supports the video monitoring teams in outage resolution. Charles is a 35 year veteran of the video industry and 9 year employee of CenturyLink. Steve Epstein is a Senior Lead Engineer - Managing for CenturyLink. Steve was the initial member of the CenturyLink Video team and brings 35 years of broadcast experience to CenturyLink. In addition to being Chief Engineer at several television stations, Steve was the technical editor of Broadcast • Engineering magazine. Steve is an SBE certified professional broadcast engineer and holds a BS in Broadcasting. H. An identification of the municipalities (including contact information for the municipal officials in each community) in which the applicant either owns or operates a cable communications system, directly or indirectly, or has outstanding franchises for which no system has been built. Please see Exhibit D for a list of jurisdictions Applicant or affiliate of Applicant holds a cable franchise agreement pursuant either to local agreement or statewide franchise authority. I. Plans for financing the proposed system, which must indicate every significant anticipated source of capital and significant limitations or conditions with respect to the availability of the indicated sources of capital. This information should include: 1. Current financial statement Applicant's ultimate parent company is CenturyLink, Inc. CenturyLink's most recent Form 10 -K (along with all other SEC filings) may be found here: http: / /ir.centurylink.com /docs.aspx ?iid = 4057179 2. Proposed sources and uses of funds for the construction project • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 17 Applicant's ultimate parent company is CenturyLink, Inc. which is a Fortune 500 Company (currently around Fortune 150) with annual operating revenues exceeding 18 Billion Dollars in 2013. Applicant does not require any unique or additional funding sources (i.e. special notes or bonds) in order to deploy its Prism"' service in this, or any other market. 3. Financial budgets for the next three (3) years; See response to I (4) below 4. Documentation regarding the commitment of funds; and As a publicly traded Company, CenturyLink releases a very limited amount of forward- looking information for the company as a whole, but it does not provide forward- looking information at the individual market level because it could lead to incorrect or inappropriate assumptions or conclusions by its current and potential investors regarding the business as a whole. Given the extremely sensitive nature of the information contained in the requested proforma, applicant cannot file this information as part of its application. S. Any other information that applicant determines would be useful in evaluating its financial qualifications. Please see response to I (1) above • J. A statement of ownership detailing the corporate organization of the applicant, if any, including the names and addresses of officers and directors and the number of shares held by each officer or director, and intercompany relationship, including the parent, subsidiary or affiliated company. Applicant's ultimate parent company is CenturyLink, Inc., a Louisiana corporation headquartered in Monroe, Louisiana, and, through its subsidiaries, owns 100% of Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d /b /a CenturyLink. A more detailed corporate structure is depicted on the attached Exhibit E. On April 21, 2010, CenturyLink, Inc. reached an agreement to purchase Qwest Communications International, Inc. ( "QCII ") through a tax -free, stock - for -stock transaction. Under the terms of the parties' merger agreement, CenturyLink, Inc. is the ultimate parent of QCII and the subsidiaries that were under QCII. At the time of the merger between CenturyLink and Qwest Communications International, Inc., Franchisee was a wholly -owned subsidiary of Qwest Services Corporation, Inc. as was Qwest Corporation, the entity which places facilities in the City's public rights of way pursuant to the City's ordinances and associated rules. Further, at merger, Franchisee was a member of the National Cable Television Cooperative ( "NCTC ") as was the CenturyLink entity which offers Prism in legacy CenturyLink markets, e.g., Florida. Because the NCTC expressly forbids more than one entity within a corporate family to belong to • QBSI /EDINA Application -April 301h, 2015 Page 18 • and directly obtain content from the NCTC and because any affiliated entity receiving content from the NCTC must be a wholly -owned subsidiary of the NCTC member, CenturyLink, Inc. moved Franchisee from being a subsidiary of Qwest Services Corporation to being a subsidiary of CenturyTel Broadband Services, LLC. As provided in the original application filed with the City, the following sets forth the officers and directors of Franchisee. This group of officers and directors do not own any shares of the franchisee. Qwest Broadband Services. Inc. (Delaware Domestic) Directors: R. Stewart Ewing, Jr. Stacey W. Goff Officers: Chief Executive Officer and President Glen F. Post, III President Global Markets Karen A. Puckett Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer R. Stewart Ewing, Jr. Executive Vice President, General Counsel Stacey W. Goff President IT Services and New Market Development Girish Varma • Vice President - Public Policy and Government Relations James P. Campbell President - Wholesale Operations William E. Cheek Executive Vice President - Controller and Operations David D. Cole Support Executive Vice President - Network Services Maxine Moreau Vice President and Treasurer Glynn E. Williams, Jr. Vice President Jonathan J. Robinson Secretary Kay Buchart Assistant Secretary Joan E. Randazzo Assistant Secretary Meagan E. Messina K. A notation and explanation of omissions or other variations with respect to the requirements of the proposal. None at this time • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 30th, 2015 Page 19 Respectfully Submitted, Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d /b /a CenturyLink By: Patrick Haggerty Subscribed and sworn to before me This 30th day of April, 2015 Notary Public My Commission Expires: • • QBSI /EDINA Application - April 301h, 2015 Page 20 Subscribed and sworn to before me Respectfully Submitted, Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d /b /a CenturyLink By: Patrick Haggerty Thi 30th day of April, 2015 q1j Notary Public D My Commission Expires: T0. 6-- 3 D M. BARTHEL PUbIio-Mtnneam d a d.n St, 2aeo • 0 QBSI /EDINA Application -April 30th, 2015 Page 20 ef' � CenturyLink, prisr, Phoenix Channel Lineup Prism- Essential 3 3TV(KTVK) 1003 3TV HD(KTVKDT) 1167 A &E HD 167 A &E 15 ABC(KNXV) 1179 ABC Family HD 179 ABC Family 1015 ABC HD (KNXVDT) 1796 AMC HD 796 AMC 16 Antenna TV (KNXVDT2) 1105 AXS TV 13 AZ -TV (KAZT) 1013 AZ -TV HD(KAZTDT) 41 Azteca America (KPDFCA) 310 Baby First TV 1156 BET HD 156 BET 1222 Bloomberg HD 222 Bloomberg 327 Boomerang 1182 Bravo HD 182 Bravo 1650 BTN HD 650 BTN 1651 BTN2 HD 651 BTN2 1652 BTN3 HD 652 BTN3 1230 C -SPAN HD 230 C -SPAN 1231 C-SPAN2 HD 231 CSPAN2 1327 Cartoon Network HD 326 Cartoon Network 5 CBS(KPHO) 1005 CBS HD (KPHODT) 411 CenturyLink Information 1411 CenturyLink information 8015 City of Casa Grande 8003 City of Chandler Educational Access 8002 City of Chandler Government Access 8004 City of Gilbert Govemment Access 8007 City of Glendale Government Access 8008 City of Maricopa Government Access 8010 City of Mesa Educational Access 8011 City of Mesa Government Access 8009 City of Peons Government Access 8001 City of Scottsdale Government Access 8013 City of Surprise Govemment Access 8012 City of Tempe Government Access 1526 CMT HD 526 CMT 1216 CNBC HD 216 CNBC 1202 CNN HD 202 CNN 1141 Comedy Central HD 141 Comedy Central 48 Daystar (KDTP) 1121 Discovery Channel HD 121 Discovery Channel 1303 Disney Channel HD 303 Disney Channel 9999 DVR 8016 Dysart Schools Educational Access 1134 E! HD 135 E! 9 Eight Life (KAETDT2) 7 Eight World (KAETOT3) 803 ESPN Classic 1602 ESPN HD 27 ESPN 602 ESPN 1606 ESPN2 HD 28 ESPN2 806 ESPN2 1562 EWTN HD 562 EWTN 40 Exitos (KTAZDT2) 1453 Food Network HD 453 Food Network 10 FOX(KSAZ) 1010 FOX HD(KSAZDT) 1210 FOX News Channel HD 210 FOX News Channel 1620 FOX Sports 1 HD 620 FOX Sports 1 9002 FOX Sports Pay Per View HD 9001 FOX Sports Pay Per View 1762 FS Arizona HD 1763 FS Arizona Plus HD 763 FS Arizona Plus 762 FS Arizona Prim- Complete 1129 FX HD 129 FX 1131 FXX HD 131 FXX 4004 Galavision HD 3004 Galavision 36 GetTV (KFPHOT2) 1641 Golf Channel HD 641 Golf Channel 1176 Hallmark Channel HD 176 Hallmark Channel 1106 HDNet Movies 1451 HGTV HD 451 HGTV 271 History 1203 HLN HD 203 HLN 1422 Home Shopping Network HD 19 Home Shopping Network 422 Home Shopping Network 1261 ID HD 261 ID 51 ION (KPPX) 1051 ION HID(KPPXDT) 1428 Jewelry Television HD 17 Jewelry Television 428 Jewelry Television 1168 Justice Central HD 168 Justice Central 4 KPHO Weather Now (KPHODT2) 1361 Lifetime HD 361 Lifetime 364 L'detime Real Women 1362 LMN HD 362 LMN 5129 MC 770s 5128 MC ?80s 5127 MC ?90s 5116 MC Adult Alternative 5115 MC Alternative 5146 MC Blues 5134 MC Classic Country 5118 MC Classic Rock 5149 MC Classical Masterpieces 5135 MC Contemporary Christian 5133 MC Country Hits 5103 MC Dance 5148 MC Easy Listening 5111 MC Gospel 5105 MC Hip -Hop and R &B 5107 MC Hip-Hop Classics 5101 MC H8 List 5104 MC India 5145 MC Jazz 5124 MC Kidz Only! 5150 MC Light Classical 5120 MC Love Songs 5114 MC Metal 5136 MC Mexicans 5137 MC Musica Urbana 5122 MC Party Favorites 5131 MC Pop Country 5121 MC Pop Hits 5136 MC Pop Latino 5102 MC Pop Rhythmic 5109 MC R &B Classics 5110 MC R&B Soul 5106 MC Rap 5112 MC Reggae 5117 MC Rock Hits 5113 MC Rock 5140 MC Romances 5147 MC Singers & Swing 5144 MC Smooth Jazz 5119 MC Soft Rock 5130 MC Solid Gold Oldies 5141 MC Sounds of the Seasons 5143 MC Soundscapes 5142 MC Stage & Screen 5108 MC Throwback Jams 5132 MC Today?s Country 5125 MC Toddler Tunes 5139 MC Tropicales 5126 MC Y2K 14 Me-TV (KAZTDT2) 1634 MLB Network HD 634 MLB Network 46 Movies! (KUTPDT2) 1215 MSNBC HD 215 MSNBC 1503 MTV HD 503 MTV 193 Mun2 45 My Network TV (KUTP) Contact CenturyLink Sales: 877 - 299 -0172 Support: 866 - 314 -4148 1045 My Network TV HD (KUTPDT) 1266 National Geographic Channel HD 266 National Geographic Channel 12 NBC (KPNX) 1012 NBC HD(KPNXDT) 1640 NBC SIN HD 640 NBC SIN 20 NBC Weather Plus (KPNXDT2) 1630 NFL Network HD 630 NFL Network 629 NFL ReclZone (Pay Per View) 1629 NFL RedZone HD (Pay Per View) 1638 NHL Network HD 638 NHL Network 1314 Nickelodeon HD 314 Nickelodeon 1368 Oxygen HD 368 Oxygen 1683 PAC 12 Arizona HD 683 PAC 12 Arizona 106 Pay Per View Events HD 1101 Pay Per View Events HD 101 Pay Per View Events 8 PBS Eight (KAET) 1008 PBS Eight HD (KAETDT) 8006 Phoenix Educational Access 8005 Phoenix Government Access 8014 Final County Government Access 9161 Premier League Extra Time 1 HD 9151 Premier League Extra Time 1 9162 Premier League Extra Time 2 HD 9152 Premier League Extra Time 2 9163 Premier League Extra Time 3 HD 9153 Premier League Extra Time 3 9164 Premier League Extra Time 4 HD 9154 Premier League Extra rime 4 9165 Premier League Extra Time 5 HD 9155 Premier League Extra Time 5 90 Prism Applications 92 Prism Games 301 Prism Kids 201 Prism News 11 Prism PEG Channels 601 Prism Sports 1420 QVC HD 18 QVC 420 QVC 1799 Reelz Channel HD 799 Reelz Channel 1424 ShopHO HD 424 ShopHO 1146 Spike TV HD 146 Spike TV 1337 Sprout HD 337 Sprout 1152 Syfy HD 152 Syfy 21 TBN(KPAZ) 1560 TBN HD 560 TBN 1113 TBS HD 113 TBS 5123 Teen MC 39 Telernundo(KTAZ) 3007 Telemundo(KTAZ) 1039 Telemundo HD (KTAZDT) 6 The CW(KASW) 1006 The CW HD (KASWDT) 1225 The Weather Channel HD 225 The Weather Channel 2 This TV(KTVKDT2) 1251 TLC HD 251 TLC 1109 TNT HD 109 TNT 1255 Travel Channel HD 255 Travel Channel 1164 truTV HD 165 truTV 1139 TV Land HD 139 TV Land 44 TV44(KPHELD) 35 UnlMas(KFPH) 4005 UniMas HD 33 Unlvlslon (KTVW) 1033 Univislon HD (KTVWDT) 1125 USA Network HD 125 USA Network 1102 Velocfty HD 1519 VH1 HD 519 VH1 1 Vkleo On Demand 1180 WGN HD 160 WGN Exhibit A 0 • is Includes Prism- Essential Plan channels. 1259 American Heroes Channel HD 381 Esquire TV 505 MTV2 259 American Heroes Channel 1211 FOX Business Network HD 315 Nick 2 1253 Animal Planet HD 211 FOX Business Network 1320 Nick Jr HD 253 Animal Planet 647 FOX College Sports Atlantic 320 Nick Jr 1168 BBC America HD 648 FOX College Sports Central 1316 Nicktoons HD 186 BBC America 649 FOX College Sports Pacific 316 Nicktoons 567 BYU TV 1621 FOX Sports 2 HD 1185 N WON HD 1643 CBS Sports HD 621 FOX Sports 2 185 NUVOty 643 CBS Sports 1535 Fuse HO 1256 Oprah Winfrey Network HD 515 Centric 535 Fuse 257 Oprah Winfrey Network 153 Chiller 1792 FX Movie Channel HD 1680 Outdoor Channel HD 161 Cloo 792 FX Movie Channel 680 Outdoor Channel 517 CMT Pure Country 1272 FYI HD 1531 Ovation HD 1458 Cooking Channel HD 272 FYI 531 Ovation 456 Cooking Channel 1529 Great American Country HD 1258 SCIENCE HD 1465 Destination America HD 529 Great American Country 258 SCIENCE 465 Destination America 1174 GSN HD 1642 Sportsman Channel HD 1335 Discovery Family HD 174 GSN 642 Sportsman Channel 335 Discovery Family 1274 H2 HD 322 Teen Nick 1307 Disney Junior HO 274 H2 507 Tr3s 307 Disney Junior 1794 Hallmark Movies & Mysteries HD 1790 Turner Classic Movies HD 1305 Disney XD HD 794 Hallmark Movies & Mysteries 790 Turner Classic Movies 305 Disney XD 1797 IFC HD 1157 TV One HD 1454 DIY Network HD 798 IFC 157 TV One 454 DIY Network 564 Inspiration Network 1104 Universal HD 1604 ESPN News HD 466 Life 521 VH1 Classic 604 ESPN News 184 Logo 522 VH1 Soul 1605 ESPNU HD 509 MTV Hits 1372 WE tv HD 605 ESPNU 510 MTV U 373 WE tv 1380 Esquire TV HD 1505 MTV2 HD 132 Youtoo America Prism- Preferred Includes Prism- Complete Plan channels. 220 Al Jazeera America 1172 MyDestination.TV HO 1852 Showtime HD (E) 159 ASPIRE 172 MyOestination.TV 1853 Showtime HD (W) 1470 AWE HD 1264 NASA TV HO 864 Showtime Next (E) 470 AWE 264 NASA TV 865 Showtime Next A 1219 BBC World News HD 1287 Nat Goo Wild HD 1864 Showtime Next HD (E) 219 BBC World News 267 Nat Geo Wild 1865 Showtime Next HD (W) 1540 Blue Highways TV HD 1209 One America News Network HD 680 Showtime On Demand 540 Blue Highways TV 209 One America News Network 1880 Showtime On Demand 1232 C•SPAN3 HO 1678 Outside TV HD 856 Showtime Showcase (E) 232 C -SPAN3 678 Outside TV 857 Showtime Showcase (W) 1169 Cars.TV HD 1664 PAC 12 Bay Area HD 1856 Showtime Showcase HD (E) 169 Cars.TV 684 PAC 12 Bay Area 1857 ShoMme Showcase HD (W) 217 CNBC World 1685 PAC 12 Los Angeles HD 866 Showtime Women (E) 205 CNNI 685 PAC 12 Los Angeles 867 Showtime Women (W) 1142 Comedy.TV HO 1686 PAC 12 Mountain HD 1866 Showtme Women HD (E) 142 Comedy-TV 686 PAC 12 Mountain 1867 Showtime Women HD (W) 1163 Crime 8 Investigation HD 1687 PAC 12 Oregon HD 118 Smithsonian Channel (E) 163 Crime &Investigation 687 PAC 12 Oregon 119 Smithsonian Channel (W) 263 • DoD News 1688 PAC 12 Washington HD 1118 Smithsonian Channel HD (E) 932 ENCORE (E) 688 PAC 12 Washington 1119 Smithsonian Channel HD (W) 933 ENCORE (W) 1682 PAC12 Network HD 1791 Sony Movie Channel HD 938 ENCORE Action (E) 682 PAC 12 Network 791 Sony Movie Channel 939 ENCORE Action (W) 1170 Pets.TV HD 902 Starzl (E) 1938 Encore Action HD (E) 170 PetS.TV 903 Start (W) 942 ENCORE Black (E) 1492 Pivot HD 908 Starz! Cinema (E) 043 ENCORE Black (1N) 492 Pivot 909 Starz! Cinema (W) 1942 Encore Black HD (E) 1787 PixL HD 1908 Starzl Cinema HD (E) 934 ENCORE Classic (E) 787 PlxL 910 Starz! Comedy (E) 935 ENCORE Classic (W) 1458 Recipe.TV HD 911 Start Comedy (W) 1934 ENCORE Classic HD (E) 458 Reclpe.TV 1910 Starzl Comedy HD (E) 946 ENCORE Espanol 1916 Retroplex HD 904 Starz! Edge (E) 944 ENCORE Family (E) 916 Retroplex 905 Starz! Edge (W) 945 ENCORE Family (W) 1538 Revolt HD 1904 Starz! Edge HD 1932 Encore HD (E) 538 Revolt 1902 Start! HD (E) 1933 Encore HO (W) 1476 RFD TV HD 1903 Starz! HD (W) 951 ENCORE On Demand 476 RFD TV 906 Starz! In Black (E) 1951 Encore On Demand 474 RLTV 907 Starz! In Black (W) 936 ENCORE Suspense (E) 1607 SEC Network HD 1906 Starz! In Black HO 937 ENCORE Suspense (W) 1608 SEC Network Overflow 1 HO 912 Starz! Kids and Family (E) 1936 ENCORE Suspense HD (E) 606 SEC Network Overflow 1 913 Starzl Kids and Family (W) 940 ENCORE Westerns (E) 1609 SEC Network Overflow 2 HD 1912 Starz! Kids and Family HD 941 ENCORE Westerns (W) 609 SEC Network Overflow 2 931 Starzl On Demand 1133 ES.TV HD 607 SEC Network 1931 Starz! On Demand 133 ES.TV 1789 Shorts HO 575 The Word Network 890 Flix (E) 789 Shorts 882 TMC (E) 892 Flix On Demand 852 Showtime (E) 883 TMC (W) 1892 Flix On Demand 653 Showtime (W) 1882 TMC HD (E) 1656 Gal TV HD 854 Showtime 2 (E) 1883 TMC HD (W) 656 GoITV (English) 855 Showtime 2 (W) 888 TMC On Demand 672 HRTV 1854 Showtime 2 HO (E) 1888 TMC On Demand 1914 Indieplex HD 1855 Showtime 2 HD (W) 884 TMC Xtra (E) 914 Indieplex 060 Showtime Beyond (E) 885 TMC Xtra (W) 1590 Jewish Broadcasting Service HD 861 Showtime Beyond (W) 1884 TMC Xtra HD (E) 590 Jewish Broadcasting Service 1860 Showtime Beyond HD (E) 1885 TMC Xtra HD (W) 1147 MAVTV HD 1861 Showtime Beyond HD (W) 670 TVG 147 MAVTV 858 Showtime Extreme (E) 644 Universal Sports 1116 MGM HO 859 Showtime Extreme (W) 1644 Universal Sports HD 116 MGM 1858 Showtime Extreme HD (E) 1559 UP HD 276 Military History 1859 Showtime Extreme HD (W) 559 UP 1788 MOVIEPLEX HD 862 Showtime Family (E) 1679 World Fishing Network HD 788 MOVIEPLEX 863 Showtime Family (W) 679 Wodd Fishing Network Prism- Premium Includes Prism- Preferred Plan channels. 1940 5 Star Max HD 811 HBO Comedy (W) 812 HBO Zone (E) • 840 5 Star Max 1810 HBO Comedy HD (E) 813 HBO Zone (W) 636 ActionMAX (E) 1811 HBO Comedy HD (W) 1612 HBO Zone HD (E) 837 Ac0onMAX (W) 806 HBO Family (E) 1813 HBO Zone HD (W) 1936 ActionMAX HD (E) 807 HBO Family (W) 1804 HB02 HD (E) 1837 ActionMAX HD (W) 1806 HBO Family HD (E) 1805 HB02 HD (W) 1846 Cinem ?x HD 1807 HBO Family HD (W) 834 MoreMAX (E) 846 Cinem ?x 1802 HBO HD (E) 835 MoreMAX (W) 832 Cinemax (E) 1803 HBO HD (W) 1834 MoreMax HD (E) 833 Cinemax (W) 814 HBO Latino (E) 1835 MoreMax HD (W) 1832 Cinemax HD (E) 815 HBO Latino (W) 1842 Movie MAX HD 1833 Cinemax HD (W) 1814 HBO Latino HD (E) 842 MovieMAX 850 Cinemax On Demand 1815 HBO Latino HD (W) 1844 Outer Max HD 1850 Cinemax On Demand 830 HBO On Demand 844 OutarMAX 802 HBO (E) 1830 HBO On Demand 838 ThnllerMAX (E) 803 HBO (W) 808 HBO Signature (E) 839 ThrillerMAX (W) 804 HBO 2 (E) 809 HBO Signature (W) 1838 ThrillerMax HD (E) 805 HBO 2 (W) 1808 HBO Signature HO (E) 1839 ThrillerMax HD (W) 810 HBO Comedy (E) 1809 HBO Signature HD (W) 1884 3127 Premium Packages Available as Add -ons: Preferred and Premium plans include select Add-on Channels. Cinemax Add -on Package 1840 5 Star Max HO 833 Cinemax (W) 1842 Movie MAX HD 840 5 Star Max 1832 Cinemax HD (E) 842 MovieMAX 836 ActionMAX (E) 1833 Cinemax HD (W) 1844 Outer Max HD 837 ActlonMAX (W) 850 Cinemax On Demand 844 OuterMAX 1836 ActionMAX HD (E) 1850 Cinemax On Demand 838 ThnllerMAX (E) 1837 ActionMAX HD (W) 834 MoreMAX (E) 639 ThnBerMAX (W) 1846 Cinem ?x HD 835 MoreMAX (W) 1838 ThrillerMax HD (E) 846 Cinem ?x 1834 MoreMax HD (E) 1839 ThrillerMax HD (W) 832 Cinemax (E) 1835 MoreMax HD (W) Discovery an Espanol 3056 International -Al -Carte Add-on Package 3740 Al Jazeera America 3682 Filipino on Demand 3703 TV Asia 892 3710 Bollywood Hits on Demand 3802 Rai Italia 3680 TV Japan Rix On Demand 3882 Channel One Russia 3704 Sony Entertainment Television Asia (SET 3832 TV5 Montle 863 3603 China Central TV Showtime Women HD (E) Asia) 3702 Zee TV Showtime HD (E) 3604 CTI -Zhong Tian Channel 3706 STAR India PLUS 1853 Showtime HD (W) 882 TMC (E) 855 3681 The Filipino Channel Showtime Next (E) 883 TMC (W) Paquete Latino Add -on Package Showtime 2 HD (E) 1815 HD 1813 (W 3146 Bandamax 3102 Discovery an Espanol 3056 La Familia Cosmovision 860 3053 Boomerang an Espanol 3103 Discovery Familia 3017 Latele Novela Showtime Beyond (W) 3022 Cable Noticias 3051 Disney an Espanol 3149 Ritmoson Latino 1880 3054 Cartoon Network an Espanol 3052 Disney XD Espanol 3078 TEN Enlace Showtime Showcase (E) 3025 Cine Mexicano 3302 ESPN Deportes 3143 Telehil 1884 3127 Cine Sony 3077 EWTN an Espanol 3024 TV Chile TMC Xtra HD (W) 3202 CNN an Espanol 3303 FOX Deportes 3013 WAPA America 3128 3129 De Pelicula De Pelicula C!asico 3304 3104 GOITV History an Espanol • Starz/Encore Add -on Package 932 ENCORE (E) 1951 Encore On Demand 910 Starz! Comedy (E) 933 ENCORE (W) 936 ENCORE Suspense (E) 911 Starz! Comedy (W) 938 ENCORE Action (E) 937 ENCORE Suspense (W) 1910 Starz! Comedy HD (E) 939 ENCORE Action (W) 1936 ENCORE Suspense HO (E) 904 Starzl Edge (E) 1938 Encore Action HD (E) 940 ENCORE Westerns (E) 905 Starz! Edge (W) 942 ENCORE Black (E) 941 ENCORE Westerns (W) 1904 Starz! Edge HD 943 ENCORE Black (W) 1914 ! ndieplex HO 1902 Starzl HD (E) 1942 Encore Black HD (E) 914 Indieplex 1903 Starz! HD (W) 934 ENCORE Classic (E) 1788 MOVIEPLEX HD 906 Starz! In Black (E) 935 ENCORE Classic (W) 788 MOVIEPLD( 907 Starzl In Black (W) 1934 ENCORE Classic HD (E) 1916 Retroplex HD 1906 Starz! In Black HD 946 ENCORE Espanol 916 Retmplex 912 Starz! Kids and Family (E) 944 ENCORE Family (E) 902 Starz! (E) 913 Starcl Kids and Family (W) 945 ENCORE Family (W) 903 Starr! (W) 1812 Starzl Kids and Family HD 1932 Encore HD (E) 908 Staml Cinema (E) 931 Starz! On Demand 1933 Encore HD (W) 909 Stead Cinema (W) 1931 Starz! On Demand 951 ENCORE On Demand 1908 Stag! Cinema HD (E) Showtime Add -on Package 890 Flix (E) 1858 Showtime Extreme HD (E) 1857 Showtime Showcase HD (W) 892 Flix On Demand 1859 Showtime Extreme HD (W) 866 Showtime Women (E) 1892 Rix On Demand 862 Showtime Family (E) 867 Showtime Women (W) 852 Showtime (E) 863 Showtime Family (W) 1866 Showtime Women HD (E) 853 Showtime (W) 1852 Showtime HD (E) 1867 Showtime Women HD (W) 854 Showtime 2 (E) 1853 Showtime HD (W) 882 TMC (E) 855 Showtime 2 (W) 864 Showtime Next (E) 883 TMC (W) 1854 Showtime 2 HD (E) 1815 HD 1813 (W 1855 Showtime wtime 2 HD (W) 1864 Showtime Next (E) 1863 TMC HD 860 Showtime Beyond (E) 1865 Showtime Next HD (W) 888 TMC On Demand 861 Showtime Beyond (W) 880 Showtime On Demand 1888 TMC On Demand 1860 Showtime Beyond HD (E) 1880 Showtime On Demand 884 TMC Xtra (E) 1861 Showtime Beyond HD (W) 856 Showtime Showcase (E) 885 TMC Xtra (W) 858 Showdme Extreme (E) 857 Showtime Showcase (W) 1884 TMC Xtra HD (E) 859 Showdme Extreme (W) 1856 Showtime Showcase HD (E) 1885 TMC Xtra HD (W) HBO Add -on Package 802 HBO (E) 1806 HBO Family HD (E) 808 HBO Signature (E) 803 HBO (W) 1807 HBO Family HD (W) 809 HBO Signature (W) 804 HBO 2 (E) 1802 HBO HD (E) 1808 HBO Signature HD (E) 805 HBO 2(Wt) 1803 HBO HD (W) 1809 HBO Signature HD (W) 810 HBO Comedy (E) 814 HBO Latino (E) 812 HBO Zone (E) 811 HBO Comedy (W) 615 HBO Latino (W) 813 HBO Zone ") 1810 HBO Comedy HD (E) 1814 HBO Latino HD (E) 1812 HBO Zone HD (E) • 1811 HBO Comedy HD (W) 1815 HBO Latino HD (W) 1813 HBO Zone HD (W) 806 HBO Family (E) 830 HBO On Demand 1804 HB02 HD (E) 807 HBO Family (W) 1830 HBO On Demand 1805 HB02 HD (W) • is • TRADE SECRET/PRIVILEGED INFORMATION • CLASSIFICATION RATIONALE State: Minnesota Description/Title of Information: Application of Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d/b /a CenturyLink for a Competitive Cable Franchise Agreement with the City of Edina Trade Secret/Privileged Designation Rationale: Exhibit B to the Application of Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d/b /a CenturyLink for a Competitive Cable Franchise Agreement with the City of Edina contains information that is considered Trade Secret because (1) CenturyLink makes reasonable efforts to ensure its privacy and (2) the data derives actual or potential independent economic value because the information is not generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain value from its disclosure or use. For this reason, Exhibit B to the Application of Qwest Broadband Services, Inc. d/b /a CenturyLink for a Competitive Cable Franchise Agreement with the City of Edina should be protected from public disclosure. • Exhibit B Has Been Redacted In Its Entirety • Promotional Rate $54.99 $69.99 $ 84.99 $114.99 Rack Rate $74.99 $89.00 Exhibit C $104.99 $134.99 ry CenturyLink� 0 • C • Locally Negotiat , focally Negotiated Statewide Franchises Franchises `' Franchise Gulf Shores, AL Colorado Springs, CO Las Vegas, NV Orange Beach, AL Denver, CO North Las Vegas, NV Baldwin County, AL Monument, CO Clark County, NV Fountain, CO Henderson, NV Phoenix, AZ El Paso County, CO Chandler, AZ Gypsum, CO Tallahassee, FL Mesa, AZ Eagle, CO Fort Myers, FL Queen Creek, AZ Eagle County, CO Orlando, FL Glendale, AZ Centennial, CO Peoria, AZ Littleton, CO Columbia, MO Scottsdale, AZ Castle Rock, CO Surprise, AZ Parker, CO Raleigh /Durham DMA, NC Goodyear, AZ Jefferson County, CO Maricopa County, AZ Lone Tree, CO LaCrosse DMA, W I Pinal County, AZ Douglas County, CO Buckeye, AZ Council Bluffs, IA Florence, AZ Papillion, NE Pottawattamie County, IA Gilbert, AZ Springfield, NE Carter Lakes, IA Casa Grande, AZ Gretna, NE Tempe, AZ Ralston, NE Paradise Valley, AZ La Vista, NE Apache Junction, AZ Bellevue, NE Omaha, NE Douglas County, NE Sarpy County, NE Salt Lake County, UT Exhibit D �. f CenturyLinkM CenturyTel Broadband Services LLC X Qwest Communications International, Inc. CenturyTel CenturyTel/Teleview Qwest Broadband TeleVideo, Inc. of Wisconsin, Inc. Services, Inc. Exhibit E 0 0 Qwest Communications Services, Inc. Qwest Corporation CenturyLink- 0 • SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION ("SWSCC") 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 0 Prepared by: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. MOSS & BARNETT A Professional Association 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: (612) 877 -5340 Fax: (612) 877 -5031 Email: brian.groganPlawmoss.com SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 0 ( "SWSCC ") 2014 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2014 SWSCC Members .................................................... ..............................1 2014 SWSCC Meetings ..................................................... ..............................1 SWSCCIncome / Expenses ............................................... ..............................2 Exhibit A — Meeting Minutes • is 2818191vl • 2014 SWSCC Members Chair: *Scott Neal, City Manager - City of Edina Vice Chair: *Patty Latham, IT Manager - City of Minnetonka Secretary /Treasurer: *Jim Genellie, Assistant City Manager — City of Hopkins Directors: *Rick Getschow, City Manager - City of Eden Prairie *Steve Devich, City Manager - City of Richfield Ron Case, Council Member - City of Eden Prairie Ann Swenson, Council Member - City of Edina Dick Allendorf, Council Member - City of Minnetonka Kristi Halverson, Council Member - City of Hopkins Pat Elliot, Council Member - City of Richfield Commission Staff: Brian T. Grogan, Attorney /Administrator *Designates member of Managers' Committee 2014 SWSCC Meetings • As indicated below the Southwest Suburban Cable Full Commission met two times during 2014. The meeting minutes are attached. 1. Full Commission meeting - Wednesday, April 23, 2014; and 2. Full Commission meeting - Wednesday, December 3, 2014 1 2818191v1 2014 SWSCC Expenses /Income 1. 2014 Annual Operating Budget. The 2014 budget was approved by the Commission at the October 23, 2013 meeting. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION Operating Expenses 2014 Budget Legal and Administrative Costs $42,500.00 Seminar Expenses Eden Prairie MACTA Conference $1,050.00 NATOA Conference $2,600.00 Insurance 27% League of MN Cities $2,100.00 Memberships $201,720.62 MALTA $3,500.00 NATOA $450.00 Alliance for Community Media $100.00 Access Playback Personnel $32,805.00 Contingency $7,500.00 Total Operating Expenses $92,605.00 Capital Expenses $198,870.56 Playback Equipment $6,320.00 City of Bloomington Access Facilities $15,000.00 Total Capital Expenses $21,320.00 TOTAL EXPENSES $113,925.00 2. 2014 Franchise Fee Payments Member City 2014 1st Quarter 2014 2nd Quarter 2014 3rd Quarter 2014 4th Quarter 2014 Total % of subs Eden Prairie $203,141.80 $208,177.58 $203,725.55 $205,930.32 $820,975.25 27% Edina $198,460.77 $203,626.07 $201,720.62 $204,930.32 $808,737.7 25% Hopkins $55,857.39 $57,471.51 $56,437.60 $58,312.00 $228,078.50 9% Minnetonka $196,626.46 $201,596.55 $198,870.56 $200,516.55 $797,610.12 25% Richfield $89,170.86 $90,648.35 $88,741.08 $89,885.11 $358,445.40 14% TOTAL $743,257.21 $761,520.Oq $749,495.411 $759,574.3q $3,013,847.0 100% 2818191v1 • • 0 • EXHIBIT A MINUTES Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Wednesday, April 23, 2014 At approximately 4:05 p.m. Mr. Scott Neal called the meeting to order. Those present included: Mr. Rick Getschow and Dr. Ron Case of Eden Prairie, Mr. Scott Neal and Ms. Ann Swenson of Edina, Mr. Jim Genellie and Ms. Kristi Halverson of Hopkins, Ms. Patty Latham of Minnetonka and Mr. Steve Devich of Richfield. Guests present included Ms. Nathalie Gage, Community Television Administrator, Ms. Karly Werner and Ms. Kate Hensing of Comcast. Staff present included Mr. Brian Grogan and Ms. Terri Hammer of Moss & Barnett. CONSENTAGENDA Mr. Devich moved to accept the Consent Agenda items and Ms. Swenson seconded the motion. Mr. Neal called for a vote on the motion and all those present voted in favor of adopting the consent agenda items. NEW BUSINESS A. 2014 Election of Officers. Motion was made by Ms. Swenson to approve the following slate of officers: Mr. Neal - Chair, Ms. Latham - Vice Chair, and Mr. Genellie - • Secretary/Treasurer. The motion was seconded by Ms. Halverson and the motion passed. B. 2013 Annual Report. Mr. Grogan briefly described the Annual Report. Mr. Genellie moved to approve the 2013 Annual Report. Motion was seconded by Mr. Getschow and the motion passed. Ms. Hammer will finalize the 2013 Annual Report and distribute to a representative of each member city. • C. 2014 List of Directors. Mr. Grogan referenced the attached list of the present directors and administrative representatives of the Commission. Mr. Neal made one correction to his email address. Ms. Hammer will redistribute to a representative of each member city. 3. SECRETARY /TREASURER'S REPORT A. Treasurer's Report and Approval of Claims. [handouts attached to agenda packet] Mr. Genellie reviewed the Treasurer's Report and Approval of Claims. Mr. Devich moved to accept the Claims' Report and Treasurer's Report and Ms. Swenson seconded the motion. Motion passed. B. Insurance Waiver. Mr. Genellie's advice to the Commission is to "not waive" the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance. Ms. Halverson moved to `not waive" the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance and Mr. Getschow seconded the motion. Motion passed. A -1 2sisi9ivi 4. ATTORNEY /ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT is A. Access Programming Update. Discussion was held regarding how to ensure programming is submitted after equipment checkout has occurred. B. Customer Service — Basic 1 Encryption. Cities have received complaints from subscribers regarding the equipment fees that Comcast charges. Mr. Grogan explained that the cities have no authority to regulate equipment fees. C. Commission Web Site. Mr. Devich made a motion to move ahead with creating a web site for the Commission. Ms. Swenson seconded the motion. Moss & Barnett will mock -up a home page and gather costs to be discussed at the next Full Commission meeting. D. Comcast /Time Warner Merger. Mr. Grogan explained the merger and the steps that will occur over the next several weeks to review the transaction. E. Legislative Update. Very limited action in the legislature on cable communications bills this session. More information will be provided as it becomes available. 5. MANAGER'S COMMITTEE REPORT The Managers' Committee had nothing to report. 6. COMPANYREPORT . The Commission received correspondence from Comcast dated January 29, 2014 through March 19, 2014. 7. NEXT MEETING DA TE The next regular Full Commission meeting is Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 4:00 p.m. at the Hopkins City Hall. 8. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 5:05 p.m. Mr. Devich moved to adjourn the meeting and Mr. Genellie seconded the motion. Motion passed. • A -2 2818191vt • MINUTES Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Wednesday, December 3, 2014 At approximately 4:00 p.m. Mr. Scott Neal, Commission Chair, called the meeting to order. Those present included Mr. Rick Getschow and Dr. Ron Case of Eden Prairie, Mr. Scott Neal and Ms. Ann Swenson of Edina, Mr. Jim Genellie and Ms. Kristi Halverson of Hopkins, Ms. Patty Latham and Mr. Richard Allendorf of Minnetonka. Guests present included Ms. Karly Werner and Ms. Kate Hensing of Comcast, Ms. Nathalie Gage, SWTV and Mr. Jeff Strate, public access producer. Staff present included Mr. Brian Grogan and Ms. Terri Hammer of Moss & Barnett. CONSENT AGENDA A. Mr. Devich moved to accept the Consent Agenda and Mr. Genellie seconded the motion. Mr. Neal called for a vote on the motion and all those present voted in favor of adopting the consent agenda. 2. ATTORNEY /ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. SWTV Report — Ms. Gage summarized the SWTV report located in the agenda packet. Ms. Gage discussed equipment back -up should blackouts and /or outages occur. She will research how other commissions handle these situations and present options for the • Commission's consideration at its April 2015 Full Commission meeting. B. Comcast /Midwest Cable Transfer — Mr. Grogan presented an overview of the proposed transfer of the cable television franchise, the Transfer Report, proposed Resolution and Guaranty and related timing. Mr. Devich moved to recommend adoption by each member city of the Resolution and Guaranty as presented. Ms. Swenson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. 0 C. Bloomington Studio. Mr. Grogan reported that the City of Bloomington is pleased with the current agreement and offered the Commission a one year renewal of the existing Agreement under the same terms and conditions. Bloomington provided the Addendum #2 located in the agenda packet. Ms. Swenson moved to sign Addendum #2 to the Agreement between Bloomington and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission renewing for one year - January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Dr. Case seconded the motion. Motion passed. 3. SECRETARY /TREASURER'S REPORT A. Treasurer's Report and Approval of Claims. Mr. Genellie reviewed the Treasurer's and Claims Reports as provided in the agenda packet. Mr. Devich moved to accept the Claims' Report and Treasurer's Report and Mr. Getschow seconded the motion. Motion passed. B. 2015 Annual Budget. Mr. Grogan discussed the draft 2015 Annual Budget. Mr. Genellie moved to adopt the 2015 annual budget. Motion was seconded by Dr. Case. Motion passed. A -3 2818191vl 4. MANAGER'S COMMITTEE REPORT - Nothing to Report. 0 5. COMPANY REPORT The Commission received correspondence from Comcast during May 7, 2014 through September 29, 2014 as identified in the agenda packet. Company staff thanked the Commission for its patience during the transfer process. Company staff reported a new partnership with UPS for subscriber's use in returning equipment. 6. NEXT MEETING DATE The next regular Full Commission meeting is Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. - Minnetonka City Hall. 7. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Devich moved to adjourn the meeting. Motion was seconded by Mr. Genellie. Meeting adjourned at approximately 5:20 p.m. • A -4 _SIS1910 • SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 2015 Contact Information CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MN Mr. Rick Getschow, City Manager 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952 - 949 -8410 Fax: 952 - 949 -8589 Email: retschow a)edenprairie.orq Ms. Kathy Nelson, Council Member 8080 Mitchell Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone: 952 - 949 -8410 Fax: 952 - 949 -8589 Email: knelson(aD-edenprairie.org CITY OF EDINA, MN Mr. Scott Neal, City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 952 - 826 -0401 Fax: 952 - 826 -0390 Email: sneal(a)EdinaMn.gov Ms. Ann Swenson, Council Member 6021 Concord Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Cell: 952 - 484 -4894 Home: 952 - 927 -7524 Email: swensonann'l Agmail.com CITY OF HOPKINS, MN Mr. James Genellie, Assistant City Manager 1010 South First Street Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: 952 - 935 -8474 Fax: 952 - 935 -1834 E:mail: genellie(@hopkinsmn.com Ms. Kristi Halverson, Council Member 33 Van Buren Avenue South Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: 952 - 935 -3865 Email: khalverson (a- )hopkinsmn.com CITY OF MINNETONKA, MN Ms. Patty Latham, IT Manager 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 952- 939 -8259 Fax: 952 - 939 -8396 Email: platham(a7eminnetonka.com 2762111 v1 CITY OF MINNETONKA, MN Continued Mr. Dick Allendorf, Council Member 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 952 - 935 -8200 Fax: 952 - 939 -8244 Email: dallendorfa(�eminnetonka.com Alternate Director Mr. Robert Ellingson, Council Member 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 Phone: 952 - 935 -8200 Fax: 952 - 939 -8244 Email: bellingson(a.eminnetonka.com CITY OF RICHFIELD, MN Mr. Steve Devich, City Manager 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Phone: 612- 861 -9702 Fax: 612- 861 -9749 Email: sdevichCa.cityofrichfield.org Pat Elliott, Council Member 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Email: pelliottCoDcitvofrichfield.orq Alternate Director Debbie Goettel, Council Member 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN 55423 Email: dgoettel .cityofrichfield.org ATTORNEY/ADMINISTRATOR _Moss & Barnett. A Professional Association Brian T. Grogan, Esq. 150 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612- 877 -5340 Fax: 612- 877 -5031 Email: Brian.Grogan(a7lawmoss.com Web site: www.lawmoss.com COMPANY - Comcast Cable Karly Werner, Government Affairs Sr. Manager Comcast Cable 10 River Park Plaza St. Paul, MN 55107 Phone: 651 -493 -5777 Email: Karly Werner(a)cable.comcast.com Comcast Executive Customer Relations: Phone #: 888 966 -7794 Email: mn_ corporatecomplaints @cable.comcast.com ?A, • COMCAST VIA ELECTRONIC AND U.S. MAIL May 4, 2015 Mr. Brian Grogan Franchise Administrator Southwest Suburban Cable Commission 150 South 5h Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: CenturyLink Video Franchise Application Dear Mr. Grogan: In late May and early April, members of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "the Cities ") issued Notices of Intent to Franchise (herein the "Notices "). The Notices state that the Cities will hold public hearings over the course of the next two weeks regarding all applications that they receive. It is our understanding that these public hearings are to establish the record for the Cities' votes regarding whether they will commence franchise negotiation discussions, • and under what terms, with the applicants based on the applicant's response to the Notices. I am writing to provide you with Comcast's position in regard to the process going forward and limited record in front of you today. At the outset, let me state clearly that Comcast welcomes a fair and robust competitive marketplace made up of responsible competitors, and we do not oppose the granting of an equitable cable franchise to CenturyLink. Consumers can choose from numerous video options today, including Comcast, DirectTV, DISH Network, and "over the top " - services like Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV and Hulu. This fiercely competitive landscape is challenging, but it brings out the best in each company — at least when competitors face a level playing field that treats similar providers in a similar manner. I. Comcast's Interest in This Proceeding. Comcast has made substantial financial investments in its cable system over the years to serve the Cities with a state -of -the -art network. In order to provide cable services and locate its cable system within public rights -of -way, Comcast has operated under a cable franchise renewed by the Cities in August of 2012. The Franchise Agreement has required much of Comcast, including notably: • A requirement that Comcast offer cable service to customers throughout the member cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, specifically to every residential • dwelling unit within 125 feet of Comcast's feeder cable (Comcast Franchise Section 6.6 Mr. Brian Grogan May 4, 2015 Page 2 of 3 (c)) and to any new development with a density equivalent to seven (7) homes per one - quarter (1/4) mile for aerial construction and nine (9) homes per one- quarter(1 /4) mile for underground construction (Comcast Franchise Section 6.6 (a); • A one -time, $200,000 PEG grant (Comcast Franchise 7.16 (a)); and • Courtesy cable services to over 100 schools, municipal buildings and government offices in the member cities (Comcast Franchise Section 5.2). CenturyLink's franchise application either rejects or is silent regarding whether and to what extent it will agree to many of the franchise obligations that have been required of Comcast. II. Level Playing Field Requirements and the FCC's 621 Order. Minnesota's extensive cable franchising statutory scheme is clear that: "No municipality shall grant an additional franchise for cable service for an area included in an existing franchise on terms and conditions more favorable or less burdensome than those in the existing franchise pertaining to: (1) the area served; (2) public, educational, or governmental access requirements; or (3) franchise fees." Minn. Stat. § 238.08, subd. 1(b). • Since "applicant is still finalizing its initial footprint for the deployment of cable services "in the member cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, the applicant did not provide any information regarding the area it is proposing to serve. Comcast, therefore cannot comment on • if CenturyLink's franchise proposal is "more favorable or less burdensome" than Comcast's franchise obligations. It is concerning, however, that it does not appear that CenturyLink's buildout commitment will be consistent with the Minnesota Cable Act. Even more concerning is that CenturyLink hasn't accepted even the minimal obligations that it has made in its own applications. For example, in the application submitted to the City of Minneapolis, Centuryl,ink proposed an initial 30% buildout; in the actual franchise, however, CenturyLink committed to building only 15% of the City. We want to be very clear that the FCC's 621 Orders that CenturyLink relies upon in its response does not preempt Minnesota's Cable Act. As recently as January 2015 the FCC explained again: We clarify that those rulings were intended to apply only to the local franchising process, and not to franchising laws or decisions at the state level.' It is inaccurate to say that the City must choose between following state law and policy or following federal law and policy — the two coexist. The FCC expressly allows build out requirements in franchise agreements so long as they are "reasonable." What constitutes 'Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Order on Reconsideration, at para.7 (rel. Jan 21, 2015). • Mr. Brian Grogan May 4, 2015 Page 3 of 3 "reasonable" is left to the franchising authority to determine. While we have not yet seen an actual draft CenturyLink franchise, we expect it to contain a reasonable full- service requirement — consistent with Minnesota law and the FCC's 621 Order — so that, eventually, all neighborhoods in St. Paul would have the same availability of service and access to cable competition, and so that all providers bear similar obligations. Imposing reasonable, binding, and enforceable requirements to serve the entirety of St. Paulwill protect competitive and consumer equity and prevent selective service deployment. It will equalize the investment that all providers will be required to make in return for access to the public rights of way. It will ensure that competition develops according to which provider can best serve subscribers and not according to which provider enjoys the most advantageous regulatory requirements. IV. Conclusion. Again, Comcast does not oppose CenturyLink's entry into the local market. We are concerned that competing providers who make use of the same rights -of -way as Comcast, and who are subject to the same federal law, the same state law and the same local regulatory authority, should be held to the same reasonable level of due diligence and procedure, as well as member city -wide service requirement standards, similar to what Comcast has been held to. There are many factual and legal questions raised by CenturyLink's franchise application. Comcast has important interests at stake in this proceeding and requests that the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission establish a fair, orderly, and open process that allows for meaningful public review and input. Again, thank you for the opportunity to share our views with you on this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, or if you need any additional information. Since , mmett Cole an Vice President Government Affairs Cc: Members of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission is To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: May 6, 2015 A, w�- Ow Le "I • fh B9 • ro lase Agenda Item #: VI.B. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING— Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Lot Division Procedures, Rezoning Procedures, Side Yard Setback Regulations and R -2 Regulations, Ordinance No. 2015 -07 Action Requested: Grant first reading of the attached Ordinance No. 2015 -07. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to hold a public hearing on a Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding procedures for lot divisions and rezoning; side yard setback requirements; and R -2 district regulations. The proposed Ordinance is the result of the recommendations from the Planning Commission /City Council Work Session on February 17 regarding the city's rezoning procedure. Additionally, this Ordinance includes items recommended by the City Council regarding lot divisions, and items discussed by the Planning Commission to make the Code more user friendly and understandable. The following is a summary of each of the "Sections" in the Ordinance: Section 1. Lot Division /Party Wall Division. This would allow a lot division (an adjustment to an existing lot line), and a party wall division of an existing duplex to be done administratively. The lot line adjustment cannot create a new lot, cannot make one lot large enough to be eligible for further subdivision and cannot create an unbuildable lot. The resulting parcels must meet applicable ordinances. If one lot is nonconforming, it must become more conforming. Currently, lot line adjustments (lot divisions) require review and recommendation of the Planning Commission and final action by the City Council. This can be time consuming for applicants wishing only adjust a lot line. Edina is unique in requiring this type of process. Most cities have their staff review and approve these requests. Section 2. Window Well. A definition has been added for a window well. This definition would include egress window wells. The setback regulation is now for all types of window wells. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 isSection 3. Plan Modifications. Additional detail, including impervious surface, on -site circulation and access, and landscaping has been added in regard to plan modifications following city council approval. Sections 4 & S. Procedure for Rezoning. As discussed at the City Council work session, these two Sections amend the Zoning Ordinance to create a I -step process for standard rezoning requests; and a 2- step process for PUD, Planned Unit Development rezoning requests. The second step of the PUD process would be a review by the City Council only. This final review is to ensure that the final plans are consistent with the plans approved in the first step, and also that the plans include the conditions that were required in the first step. If changes are made to the plan following the I5t step, beyond what is allowed in Section 36 -30 of the Zoning Ordinance, the applicant would be required to go back again to the Planning Commission for recommendation, the same as the I st step. (See Section 3 for the detail of plan modifications.) Sections 6 & 7. Building Coverage, Side Yard Setback requirements. Adds clarity to building coverage exemptions, and the side yard setback requirements. This section proposes an elimination of the side yard setback requirement to increase the side yard setback 6 inches for every I -foot that a single family home exceeds 15 feet in height. The side yard setbacks were recently increased by generally 2 feet total on lots 50 -74 feet in width. (One foot on each side.) However, builders and homeowners could choose the option to maintain the previous • setback requirements, as long as the second story setback was increased. However, since this ordinance went into effect, the vast majority of new homes are being built with the new increased setback rather than the old method. Homes that are less than 50 feet in width and over 75 feet in width are still required to meet the standard of having to increase the setback on the second story. Lots that exceed 75 feet in width are required a 10- foot side yard setback. Spacing between these homes has not been an issue in the past. Lots less than 40 feet in width struggle to build 2 -story homes giving the added second story setback requirement. Staff experiences a lot of confusion by residents and builders when they try to interpret this section of the ordinance. By eliminating the second story increased setback rule, it also eliminates the confusion on measuring building height on the side yard from proposed grade. This is confusing to many, because the overall height of a home is measured from previously existing grade along the front building line. It also eliminates the confusion over where the height of the structure is measured to. (See I .c on page I I of the proposed ordinance.) Section 8. R -2 District Regulations. This Section corrects a typo that restricts the maximum height of a duplex to be 35 feet. • Section 9. Building Height. Corrects an error on the table to refer to the height overlay map. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Section 10. Nonconforming R -2 Lots. This Section allows duplexes on existing nonconforming R -2 lots to be torn down and rebuilt without the need for a variance. This would be consistent with existing R- I lots that are nonconforming. Currently, substandard R -2 lots are required lot area and width variances when structures are torn down and replaced. The text of the entire Nonconforming Lot Section has been added for context. Please note that the language suggested is the same as is used for nonconforming lots in the R- I District. ATTACHMENTS: • Ordinance No. 2015 -07 • Planning Commission minutes — March 11, March 25, April 8 and April 22, 2015 • • ORDINANCE NO. 2015 -07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 32 • AND 36 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE The City Council Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 32 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 32 -6. Plat not required. (a) Double dwelling units. As pFevi ed in sect; on 32 , Q(a) No plat shall be required for subdivisions of lots in Double Dwelling Unit Districts but only a lot division Party wall division pursuant to subsection (c) of this section shall be required. (b) Lot divisiGn Lot line adjustment. No plat shall be required for any let divisieR lot line adjustment which adjusts or relocates a common lot line separating two lots and which does not create a new undeveloped parcel, tract or lot that complies, alone or in combination with one or more other parcels, tracts or lots, with the applicable minimum lot area and other requirements of this chapter and section. However, befc)re any lot divisien shall be made or any conveyance resulting from the lot division is plaeed of record, the couneil shall adopt a resolution appFeving the same, and the preceduFe shall be the same as for pFeliminary plat approval as set out in artiele division 3 of this chapter except th-a • (1) A nook of the hearing before the couneil need t be published; (2) Ne sign -reed -be ereetedj and (c) Procedure. Lot line adjustments may be approved by the city planner if the following conditions are met: (1) Lot Line Adjustment Conditions. The new legal descriptions for the properties are metes and bounds; The adjustment does not result in the creation of a new lot , does not make one of the lots large enough to be eligible for further subdivision, and does not make an unbuildable lot buildable; and C. The resulting parcels meet all applicable ordinance requirements, except that if one of the parcels was previously non - conforming, it must become • more conforming as a result of the subdivision. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX (2) Party Wall Division Conditions. • a. The new legal descriptions for the properties are metes and bounds; b. The multi - family building is already built; C. The lot line(s) is along an existing, common wall; d. The division does not make one of the lots large enough to be eligible for further subdivision; e. Verification has been provided that the building would meet building code requirements with the new lot line; f. The following items are submitted for review by the city attorney, who will designate which items must be recorded: 1. Documents establishing how the building, common sewer and water lines and any common drives will be maintained and who will be responsible; and 2. Common access easements for each lot. (3) Application Process. a. An application to adjust a lot line between two existing lots or divide a lot along an existing party wall(s) of a multi - family building must submitted to the planning division. The application must be accompanied by all of the following: 1. An application fee. 2. A full legal description of the existing properties, as documented by current land title records. 3. An existing conditions survey. The survey must include: lot dimensions, all platted and recorded easements, all existing structures with dimensions to show size and location, structure setbacks from all property lines, and the location of existing driveways and utility lines. 4. A proposed conditions survey. The survey must include: the proposed lot lines, all platted, recorded, and proposed easements, all existing structures with dimensions to show size and location, structure setbacks from all property lines, and the location of existing driveways and utility lines. 5. Evidence of the current condition of title to the land affected by the • lot line adjustment, which may include an abstract of title or registered property abstract or a commitment for an owner's policy of Existing text — XXXX 2 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — ;;;'. , title insurance. The city attorney may require the applicant to also provide copies of recorded instruments that are referenced in the • submitted title evidence. After receipt of the application, the city planner will consider the subdivision's consistency with this ordinance. Section 2. Sec. 36 -10, Definitions is amended to add the following definition: Window well means the clear space created by a soil- retaining structure located immediately below a window whose sill height is lower than the adjacent ground level. Required setback for window wells shall be measured from the outer edge of the supporting structure of the window well. Section 3. Sec. 36 -130, Plan Modifications is amended to read as follows: Sec. 36 -130. - Plan modifications. (a) Minor changes may be authorized by the planner only one time. Changes are considered minor if: (1) There is no increase to the proposed number of dwelling units; (2) Any proposed increase in the floor area of structures on site does not exceed five percent of the gross floor area; • (3) All proposed revisions comply with Code requirements; (4) There is no change to any condition required in a site plan approval, including building materials and color; an4 (5) The property is not located in an Edina Heritage Landmark District; (6) Impervious surface does not increase by more than five percent, unless to add required parking stalls to comply with a proof of parking plan; (7) There is no change to on -site circulation patterns or access to the site; and (8) Trees to be planted as part of the approved site plan may be relocated but not decreased in number. (b) All other plan modifications shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the commission and council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan. Section 4. Chapter 36. Article IV. Subdivision II, procedure for rezoning in the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Subdivision II. - Procedure for Rezoning Sec. 36 -212. n..T Rezoning and site plan. • The petition for rezoning shall include a may site plan with the required data and information in article III of this chapter. Existing text — XXXX 3 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX • Sec. 36 -213. Planning commission review and hearing. Upon receipt of the petition, fee and all other required information, in form and substance acceptable to the planner, the planner will review the petition, preliminay site plan and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a report to the planning commission. The commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition and pFeliminaFy site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the city at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated, wholly or partly, within 1,000 feet of the tract to which the petition relates, insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the clerk from records maintained by the assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the commission to a specified future date. The commission may recommend approval by the council based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan; (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; (5) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and (6) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Sec. 36 -214. Council hearings and decision; IaFeliminaF zoning approval. Upon r est of the planne city manageF BF .,,,time and After review and recommendation by the planning commission, the city council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the rezoning petition and pFeIiFniRaFY site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the city at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated, wholly or partly, within 1,000 feet of the tract to which the petition relates, insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the clerk from records maintained by the assessor or from other appropriate records. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued • by the council to a specified future date. An affirmative vote of three - fifths of all members of the council shall be required to grant ^FFy rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning Existing text — XXXX 4 Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four - fifths of all members of the council. if preliminary rezoning approval is nted +he petitioner may prepare a final site nlaR In granting preliminary rezoning approval, the council may make modifications to the pr liFni .ar=y site plan and may impose conditions on its approval of the site plan. The petitioner shall include the modifications, and eernply with the conditions, in the final site plan, or at another time and by other documents, as the eouncil may require or as shall be appropriate. See. 36 216. Final Feizening and site plan; planning eernmissi- d hearing. MIN (1) is consistent with the e „hnnsive plan; (2) is consistent with the preliminary site plan as approved and modified by the council contains the council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can he eernplied with by the final site plan. , /3\ Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the +rac -t r (4) Well not result i an overly in te nsive land /51 Will not result in undue +Yaffe congestion or traffic hazard-s, (6) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Godej and (7) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open spaee and natural feat 'gee. 36 2-1-7. Geeu cis hearing and decisien; final The council shall conduct a public hearing on the final rezoning and site plan in the sarfle Manne and with the same notiees as required for preliminary rezoning approval. After hearing the oral and wretten views of all interested persons, the ceuneil may accept or reject the findings of tke commission and thereby approve or disapprove the final rezoning and site plan. An affirmative vote is of three fifths of all members of the eouneil shall be required to grant final rezoning appreva4-. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text - XXXX Added text - XXXX Provided, however-, a FezeniRg 40rn any residential zening district to any RE)nFesidential zening. diStFiEt Shall require an affiFmative vote Of feUF fifthS ef all members of the eauneih to Sec. 36 -218. Filing. The approved fi+4a4 site plan shall be filed in the planning department. Sec. 36 -219. Development. The development of the tract shall be done and accomplished in full compliance with the approved f4a4-site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the council, and in full compliance with this chapter and other applicable provisions of this Code. Applications for building permits shall be reviewed by the planning department prior to issuance of such permits to determine if they conform to the provisions of this chapter, the approved final site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the council, and other applicable provisions of this Code. Sec. 36 -220. - Changes to approved final site plan. Minor changes in the location and placement of buildings or other improvements may be authorized by the planner. Proposed changes to the approved final site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the commission and council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the 4Ra4 site plan, except that a three - fifths favorable vote of the council shall be required to authorize the proposed change. Sec. 36 -221. Lapse of approved final site plan by nonuser; extension of time. (a) If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for f 4ial site plan, has not begun within two years after fi-al development site plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. (b) A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the city clerk within such two - year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The council may grant an extension of up to one year upon finding that: (1) There is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and (2) The facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one extension shall be granted. Existing text — XXXX 6 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Sec. 36 -222. - Restriction on rezoning after denial of petition. After the council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition • related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition may be filed if so directed by the council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the council after presentation to the council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. Section 5. Section 36 -255 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 36 -255. - Procedures. (a) Preapplication conference. Prior to filing of an application for a PUD, the applicant must arrange for and attend a conference with city staff. The primary purpose of the conference shall be to provide the applicant with an opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of the proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this chapter before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data. (b) Preapplication sketch plan review. Prior to filing of a PUD, the applicant is encouraged to submit a sketch plan of the project to the city planner pursuant to section 36 -126. The submittal should include a statement providing justification for the PUD, including, but not limited to, the intended utilization of the items listed in the purpose, intent and criteria in • this subdivision. (c) Planning commission and city council review. The planner shall refer the sketch plan to the planning commission and city council for discussion, review and informal comment. Any opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the planner, planning commission and city council shall be considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. There shall be no official application made for a sketch plan. It is an informal review and comment by planning commission and city council. (d) Preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning. Preliminary development plan submissions may depict and outline the proposed implementation of the sketch plan for the PUD. The preliminary development plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to, the submission requirements stipulated in article III of this chapter. Preliminary rezoning process is stipulated in section 36-95 212 -214. Preliminary rezoning shall include first reading of an Ordinance Amendment creating a PUD zoning district. (e) Final development plan and final rezoning. After approval of the preliminary development plan, the applicant may apply for a final development plan and final rezoning approval for all or a portion of the PUD. The final development plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to, the submission requirements stipulated in article III of this chapter. oaf stipulated in section 36 95 Final development plan and final rezoning shall be heard before the city council. The final development plan and final PUD is reviewed • to ensure that the proposed final development plan is consistent with the preliminary development plan and to address any new or outstanding concerns from preliminary Existing text — XXXX 7 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX approval. Should the plans be revised by the applicant beyond the allowed plan modifications outlined in section 36 -130, the final development plan and final rezoning shall therefore follow the process outlined in section 36- 212 -214, which requires review by both planning commission and city council. (f) Final rezoning to PUD. Final rezoning to PUD becomes official upon adoption of an ordinance rezoning the property. Section 6. Section 36 -438 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 36 -438. Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (1) Building coverage. e. The following improvements shall be excluded when computing building coverage: 1. Driveways and sidewalks, but not patios, subject to subsection (1)d.1 of this section. 2. Parking lots and parking ramps. 3. Accessory recreational facilities not enclosed by solid walls and not covered by a roof, including outdoor swimming pools, tennis courts and shuffleboard courts. • 4. Unenclosed and uneeveFed steps and stoops less than 50 square feet. 5. Overhanging eaves and roof projections not supported by posts or pillars. • (2) Setbacks. Table is revised as follows: Minimum setbacks, (subject to the requirements of subsection 36- 439(1). Front Stet [Side Street Interior Side Street Rear Ya d 1. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width. 30' ** 15' 10' 25' 2. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots more than 60 feet in width, but less than 75 feet in width. 30 15 The required interior yard setbackef 5 feet OneFease by ^ ^ thiFd 25 shall feet (4 inches) for foot that *h. each let 60 feet width exceeds 36 439(1)c. shay apply; ^ subsection shall meet the table below: Lot Width Total Side Yard Setbacks from both Interior Side Lot Lines 74 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 73 I 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 72 20' with no less than 10 feet on one side 71 19'4" with no less than 9 feet on one side 70 1 18'8" with no less than 9 feet on one side Existing text — XXXX Stricken text - YCXXX Added text — XXXX W r: Minimum setbacks, (subject to he requirements of subsection Front Side Street Interior Side Street Rear Street Ya d 36- 439(1). 69 18' with no less than 9 feet on one side 68 17'4" with no less than 8 feet on one side 67 16'8" with no less than 8 feet on one side 66 16' with no less than 8 feet on one side 65 15'4" with no less than 7 feet on one side 64 14'8" with no less than 7 feet on one side 63 14' with no less than 7 feet on one side 62 13'4" with no less than 6 feet on one side 61 12' 8" total with no less than 6 feet on one side if this is for the inteFieF subsectien3:k�(!)e. shall not, eptien utilized requiFed side yaFd setbaek, Front Side Interior Side Rear Street Street Yard Yard 5'�seetie�3:@ 9(! )e. hall apply; eF 12' total, with no less than 3. Single dwelling unit buildings lots between 50 and 60 feet 30' ** 15' 25' 5' on one side an d s„hser +;en 36 in width. ,,,,+ ., pi„ 4R(I) sha 4. Single dwelling unit buildings on lots less than 50 feet in 30' ** 15' 5' 25' width. 5. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: a. Detached garages, tool sheds, greenhouses and garden 30' ** >15' 3' 3' houses entirely within the rear yard, including the eaves. b. Detached garages, tool sheds, greenhouses and garden 30' ** 15' 5' 5' houses not entirely within the rear yard. c. Unenclosed decks and 30' ** 15' 5' 5' patios. d. Swimming pools, including appurtenant equipment and 30' ** 15' 10' 10' required decking. e. Tennis courts, basketball courts, sports courts, hockey and skating rinks, and other 30' ** 15' 5' 5' similar recreational accessory uses including appurtenant fencing and lighting. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX • • Minimum setbacks, (subject to he requirements of subsection Front Side Street Interior Side Street Rear Stre t Yard 36- 439(1). All other accessory buildings 30' ** 15' 5' S' and structures. 3' g. Egress window wells. NA NA EgF (window wells may eneFea '`' NA in the are exempt from the side yard setback requirement on one side.) _F 6. Other Uses: a. All conditional use buildings or structures including accessory buildings less than 50' 50' 50' 50' 1,000 square feet; except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools b. All conditional use accessory buildings 1,000 square feet or 95' 95' 95' 95' larger. c. Driving ranges, tennis courts, maintenance buildings and 50' 50' 50' 50' swimming pools accessory to a golf course. d. d. D aycare facilities, pre- 30' 35' 35' 35' hools and nursery schools. ** See subsection 36- 439(1) below for required setback when more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one [side) of a street that ends in a cul -de -sac, or on one side of a dead end street are occupied by dwelling units. Section 7. Section 36- 439(1) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (1) Special setback requirements for single dwelling unit lots. a. Established front street setback. When more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul -de- sac, or on one side of a dead -end street, are occupied by dwelling units, the front street setback for any lot shall be determined as follows: 1. If there is an existing dwelling unit on an abutting lot on only one side of the lot, the front street setback requirement shall be the same as the front street setback of the dwelling unit on the abutting lot. 2. If there are existing dwelling units on abutting lots on both sides of the lot, the front street setback shall be the average of the front street setbacks of the dwelling units on the two abutting lots. 3. In all other cases, the front street setback shall be the average front street is setback of all dwelling units on the same side of that street. Existing text — XXXX 10 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX b. Side street setback. The required side street setback shall be increased to that required for a front street setback where there is an adjoining interior lot facing on • the same street. The required side street setback for a garage shall be increased to 20 feet if the garage opening faces the side street. c. d-. Rear yard setback, interior lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then, for setback purposes, the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. d. i-- Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. e. f.Through lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. Section 8. Sections 36 -466, and 36 -467 of the Edina City Code are amended to read as follows: Sec. 36 -466. Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (a) The requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height in the R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District are as follows: (1) Maximum building coverage: 25 percent. (2) Setbacks (subject to the provisions of subsection (d) of this section). 0 a. Principal use buildings. Existing text — XXXX 11 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX .■rsrrsrrr.�:r.�r.��r��u� Wo c. d-. Rear yard setback, interior lots. If the rear lot line is less than 30 feet in length, or if the lot forms a point at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then, for setback purposes, the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. d. i-- Rear yard setback, corner lots required to maintain two front street setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the junction of the interior lot lines, the line segment being the maximum distance from the junction of the street frontages. e. f.Through lots. For a through lot, the required setback for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less than 25 feet. Section 8. Sections 36 -466, and 36 -467 of the Edina City Code are amended to read as follows: Sec. 36 -466. Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (a) The requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height in the R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District are as follows: (1) Maximum building coverage: 25 percent. (2) Setbacks (subject to the provisions of subsection (d) of this section). 0 a. Principal use buildings. Existing text — XXXX 11 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX 1. Front street setback: 30 feet. ** 2. Side street setback: 15 feet. 3. Interior side yard setback: ten feet. 4. Rear yard setback: 35 feet. b. Accessory buildings and structures. Setbacks for accessory buildings and structures shall be the same as those required by this chapter for building and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings in the R -1 district. * *See section 36- 439(1) for required setback when more than 25 percent of the lots on one side of a street between street intersections, on one side of a street that ends in a cul- de -sac, or on one side of a dead -end street are occupied by dwelling units. (3) Height: 2% stories or 30 35 feet, whichever is less. (b) The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a double dwelling unit shall be 35 feet. The maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Sec. 36 -467. Special requirements. (a) Generally. In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: (1) Application of requirements. Requirements for lot area and dimensions, building coverage, setbacks and height shall be applied to the entire double dwelling unit building and the entire lot, and shall ignore any subdivision of building and lot which has been, or may be, made in order to convey each dwelling unit separately. (2) Sewer and water connections. Each dwelling unit must be separately and independently connected to public sanitary sewer and water mains, or shall have been granted a waiver thereof in accordance with article X of chapter 10 (3) Subdivided R -2 lots. A double dwelling unit building and lot may be subdivided pursuant to chapter 32 along the common party walls between the dwelling units, provided that: a. A building permit has been issued and the building foundation is in place; b. Each parcel resulting from the subdivision must have frontage on a public street of not less than 25 feet; c. The parcels resulting from the subdivision shall each comprise approximately the same number of square feet, , Lei; and d. A rear yard not less than 25 feet in depth must be provided for each dwelling unit. Existing text — XXXX 12 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Section 9. Section 36 -525 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Division 6. Planned Residence District (PRD). Sec. 36 -525. Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (c) Maximum building height. PRD -1, 2 1214 steries eF 30 feet, whieheveF is 1 See article XI, division 2 of this chapter, Building Height Overlay District and appendix A of the city's official zoning map F D -3 See article XI, division 2 of this chapter, Building Height Overlay District and appendix A of the city's official zoning map PRD -4 5 See article XI, division 2 of this chapter, Building Height Overlay District and appendix A o the city's official zoning map r p SR-3 See article XI, division 2 of this chapter, Building Height Overlay District and appendix A o the city's official zoning map PSR -4 See article XI, division 2 of this chapter, Building Height Overlay District and appendix A o the city's official zoning map Section 10. Section 36 -1270 of the Edina City Code is amended to add the following: Sec. 36 -1270. - Nonconforming uses, buildings and lots. 0 (a) Nonconforming buildings. (1) Alterations, additions and enlargements. A nonconforming building, other than a single dwelling unit building, shall not be added to or enlarged, in any manner, or subjected to an alteration involving 50 percent or more of the gross floor area of the building, or 50 percent or more of the exterior wall area of the building, unless such nonconforming building, including all additions, alterations and enlargements, shall conform to all of the restrictions of the district in which it is located. The percentage of the gross floor area or exterior wall area subjected to an alteration shall be the aggregate percentage for any consecutive three -year period. b. Alternate setbacks. An addition to a single dwelling unit building with a nonconforming setback, or an addition to a structure accessory to a single dwelling unit building with a nonconforming setback, may be constructed within the existing nonconforming setback, which is the shortest distance from the applicable lot line to the existing structure, subject to the following limitations: The addition shall not exceed the existing square footage encroachment into the nonconforming setback or 200 square feet, whichever is less; and 2. The addition may only be constructed on the same floor as the existing encroachment into the nonconforming setback. Existing text — XXXX 13 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX (2) Nonconformities. Except as provided in article X of this chapter, any nonconformity, • including the lawful use or occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under the ordinance from which this chapter is derived, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance or improvement, but not including expansion, except as specifically provided in this chapter, unless: a. The nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a period of more than one year; or Any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other peril to the extent of greater than 50 percent of its market value and no building permit has been applied for within 180 days of when the property is damaged. In these cases, the city may impose reasonable conditions upon a building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on adjacent property. Any subsequent use or occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy. (b) Nonconforming lots. A nonconforming lot in the R -1 district used or intended for a single dwelling unit building shall be exempt from the width, depth, area and lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this chapter, provided, that the lot: (1) Is not less than 50 feet in width; (2) Is not less than 100 feet in depth; is (3) Has at least 30 feet frontage on a street; and • (4) Has not been, at any time since October 22, 1951, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting lot or parcel which, together, complied with the minimum width, depth and area and lot width to perimeter ratio requirements imposed by this chapter. If such lot and adjoining or abutting lot or parcel has been held in such common ownership, then the property so held in common ownership shall be subject to the following: If a nonconforming lot or parcel is, or at any time since October 22, 1951, has been, held in common ownership with all or part of an adjoining or abutting parcel or lot which together comply with, or come close to complying with, the minimum width, depth, area, and lot width to perimeter ratio, requirements of this chapter, then such nonconforming lot or parcel and such adjoining or abutting parcel or lot shall be considered as one lot and shall not be decreased in size below such minimum requirements. If in a group of two or more adjoining or abutting lots or parcels owned or controlled by the same person, any single lot or parcel does not meet the full minimum depth, width, area or lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this section, such single lot or parcel shall not be considered as a separate lot or parcel able to be conveyed and developed under this Code. Existing text — XXXX 14 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX (c) Nonconforming lots. An existing nonconforming lot in the R -2 district used or intended for a double dwelling unit building shall be exempt from the width, depth, area and lot width to perimeter ratio requirements of this chapter provided the lot is at least 50 feet in width and has at least 30 feet of frontage on a street. Section 11. This ordinance is effective upon publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: • Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk • CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX day of , 2015. City Clerk 15 Concluding, Gruman briefed the Commission on the history and the vision of Carl N. Platou, who began the process of acquiring the land (with the help of the Dayton's family) whom the emergency center is named for. Gruman again thanked the Commission for their service`Itnd asked the Commission for their support. Discussion Commissioner Nemerov asked if in the future an Urgent Care sign would be added. Mr. Gruman responded that he doesn't believe so. Continuing, GOjman reported that the emergency care system they are implementing is called "Fast Track ", add4 that the emergency rooms will meet emergency patient needs only, adding the proposed emergency concept includes a 2nd floor facility for those patients that need observation; however, need care and observation on a non - emergency basis. He noted this change in concept makes "emergency room" spaces more available; because the emergency rooms aren't being tied up for observa ' in purposes and other non - emergency medical issues. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to clarify access to the emergency room facility. With graphics Robb Gruman and Steve Mirtz highlighted access to the site. They explained the importance of way finding and the struggle to provide adequate signage because the location the emergency room and the regional hospital are unique to this RMD site. A discussion ensued on the signage requirements for the Regional M 1 District and the fact that the hospital appears to require multiple sign variances. It was further,nnted that although the hospital site is zoned RMD the needs of the hospital don't meet the RMD sign ' ordinance requirements. Planner Teague noted that "revising" the sign ordinance; especially fort-he hospital site and been on the • Commission's "bucket list" for the past few years; however, the variance process has worked in accommodating the unique needs of a hospital. Teague-aid in the future the goal is to craft a sign ordinance that acknowledges the unique status of thospital in the RMD zone. Motion Co issioner Olsen moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff c itions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. r. Gruman thanked the Commission ` and informed them they should consider coming to the open house for the center in August. , VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment \�`\ Planner Presentation Planner Teague asked Commissioners to refer to materials on the proposed zoning ordinance amendments. Teague said he felt it would be best to review and comment on each section and offer comments or revisions (if any). • Lot Division /Party Wall Division Planner Teague explained that residents, developers, etc. have had issues with the term lot division, adding, many people believe it is dividing a lot; however, that's not the case. Teague explained that a lot division application covers rearrangement of lot lines or party wall divisions of double bungalows. Teague further noted that Edina is one of the few cities that require hearings before both the Commission and Council to achieve this simple request. Teague stated the present process can be time consuming for both applicant and City. Concluding, Teague asked for Commissioners comments. Commissioners agreed with Planner Teague assessment to allow lot divisions as noted for administrative review. Procedure for Rezoning Planner Teague reported that at the joint Council work session procedures for (I 20 -day review period) rezoning were discussed. Teague explained to ensure a timely application process the goal was to create a I -step process for standard rezoning and a 2 -step process for PUD rezoning requests. Teague noted the majority of rezonings also go through a sketch plan review process which is an additional; however, unbinding step. Teague said this change also reduces the number of public hearings. He reported at this time a rezoning can include up to four public hearings, adding most City's hold one (two -at the most). Chair Platteter said he understands eliminating excess public hearings from the process to expedite the • process; however, he want's assurances that there is adequate opportunities for the public to respond. Planner Teague responded that although this revision reduces the number of formal public hearings the meetings continue to be public and the public can be invited to speak. Platteter further commented that in his opinion a public hearing should continue to take place at final Council approval. Concluding Teague noted in all instances the City Council has the option to refer plans back to the Commission for further review if they deem it necessary (changes, etc.). If the Council were to refer the rezoning request back to the Commission the 120 -day clock would be reset. Commissioners also suggested that with regard to the Council referring an item back to them that it may be a good idea to define what constitutes a change that reaches the level of a re- hearing before the Planning Commission. Sections 4 & 5- Building Coverage, Side yard Setback Requirements Planner Teague reported that the changes proposed to sideyard setback should reduce ongoing confusion. Teague noted the zoning ordinance is continuing to evolve; however, one option for lots under 75 -feet in width has both residents and builders confused. Recently, the sideyard setbacks for lots between 70 -74 feet increased by 2 -feet; however the option to increase the side yard setback for each foot the building height exceeds 15 -feet remains another option. Teague said as he previously mentioned this option has created confusion especially on where to measure building height and how the step back option really works. Teague pointed out side yard setback is measured from the proposed grade along that side; however, overall building height is measured in the front from the existing grade. Eliminating this option would eliminate the confusion. Concluding Teague said the step back option would remain for lots in excess of 75 -feet. • Commissioners commented that removing that option for lots under 75 -feet in width makes sense. • Section 6 R -2 District Regulations Planner Teague reported that currently code prohibits single family homes in the R -2 zoning district unless a property owner requests a rezoning to R- I and goes through the rezoning process. Teague said he was considering eliminating the rezoning step from R -2 to R- I and asked the Commission their feelings. Concluding Teague also reported correction of a typo on duplex height. Commissioner Carr commented that she is hesitant with this change. She said without viewing a map that indicates where the City's R -2 zoning pockets are located she wouldn't feel comfortable in making an educated decision. She also noted the R -2 zoning district was usually a buffer into the residential R -I neighborhoods. Commissioner Lee stated that she too is hesitant with this revision. She further pointed out that the R -2 districts could also be areas of affordable housing. Lee also pointed out R -2 lots are larger and the tendency for builders to build larger homes (especially single family homes) could eliminate or reduce the number of affordable housing units. Concluding, Lee also indicated she likes the diversity they offer. Chair Platteter stated he agrees the R -2 zoning district does provide housing diversity. Teague said considering the affordable element of this zoning district he could be convinced to leave the code as written. Any rezoning from R -2 to R- I would require going through the rezoning application process as it now stands. • Commissioner Carr stated it's not that she's completely adverse to the option; she would like to see a map that indicates where the R -2 zoning districts are located. She added if changing the code to allow R- I homes to be built on R -2 lots this change could reduce the number of affordable housing unit options for Edina residents. Chair Platteter commented that he tends to agree with the previous comments, advising staff to take another look at this issue and provide the Commission with a map highlighting the areas zoned R -2. Section 7 Building Height Planner Teague pointed out the revision in this section was correcting an error. Section 8 Nonconforming R -2 Lots Planner Teague explained that revising this section would allow duplexes to be rebuilt on nonconforming lots without the need for a variance. Teague said this change would be consistent with existing nonconforming lots in the R -I zoning district. Commissioners agreed this made sense. Chair Platteter thanked Planner Teague and said he looks forward to reviewing the final draft. No one spoke on the issue. Commissioner Lee moved to close the public hearing.h Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Commissioner Lee stated she continues to be conflicted with the request. She noted it appears both options work; however, she sees no reason to amend the conditions of approval. Ms. Urbanski explained the upkeep needed to ensure that the pavers were working to their best capacity would be difficult to manage, adding the alternat" also addresses the drainage concerns. Commissioner Carr asked Plan' Teague if City engineering staff reviewed the , and if so, what was their opinion. Planner offaigue responded that engineering staff did w,' ; however, didn't indicate which route t�*ypreferred. Engineering stated both would work. Motion Commiallloner Olsen moved to recommend, the Planning Commission approve the re t revising a condition of approval, ,Wing the alternative presented serves the same pose. Approval is also condition ,6n Watershed District approval. Commissioner obbs seconded the motion an�ded an amendment requiring the addition of more native grasses in the rain garden. Ayes; Strauss, Thorsen, Olsen, Nemerov, Carr, Forrest, • Platteter. Nays; Hobbs and Lee. Motion carried 7 -2. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Planner Presentation Planner Teague said the Planning Commission is asked to make a recommendation to the City Council on proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments for lot divisions, rezoning's, side yard setback requirements and R -2 district regulations. Teague updated Commissioners on the changes made to each section per their input. Discussion A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement on the changes made; however, added that the Ordinance should also include a definition of window well; eliminate the egress window reference , and add to Section 3 36 -130 Plan Modifications. Commissioners reiterated the need for a definition of window well, pointing out "window wells, egress windows, have created some confusion. Public Hearing • Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. 0 Mike Korman, 6113 Beard Avenue said his concern is with Sections 4 & 5 adding that he has a 1955 rambler and would appreciate it if the Commission would act quickly on the proposed ordinance amendments. John Crabtree, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue told the Commission a definition of window wells is needed in the code; along with how /where to measure building height. Crabtree said another issue that concerns him is with trespass during tear /down rebuilds. Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place stated he agrees with Mr. Crabtree and his suggestion of providing a definition of window well. Grotz further said residents need protection from those who cheat the system. Chair Platteter asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue; being none, Commissioner Olsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioners discussed the necessity (as previously mentioned) of providing a definition of "window well ". Planner Teague reminded the Commission that a recent Code amendment now requires a 3 -foot rule; thereby reducing trespass onto another's property to gain access to the rear yard area. Commissioners agreed that was a needed amendment; however they added a definition of window well was also necessary. Commissioner Hobbs asked the reason for the required "3- foot" rule. Commissioner Forrest explained the reason was mostly to provide protection for smaller lot neighborhoods by requiring a 3 -foot unencumbered access strip into the rear yard. After a brief discussion Commissioners suggesting eliminating the word "egress" and providing a definition for "window well ". The discussion continued on allowing an R -2 lot to be developed as an R -I as a principle use. There was some concern that allowing this without going through the process could eliminate affordable housing options; however, it was acknowledged when it comes to teardown /rebuilds would anything be considered affordable. Commissioners felt more discussion in needed on this topic before they vote on it. Commissioner Thorsen asked Planner Teague if the City receives many applications going from an R -2 to an R -1. Teague responded that request isn't asked very often. Chair Platteter said in summary that more work is needed before adopting all the proposed amendments. Planner Teague agreed adding he would bring back revisions. Chair Platteter asked Ms. Lindale to comment on the tree loss and drain slues raised by neighbors. Ms. Lindale said she is unsure of the exact percentage of tree loss -,but would have that calculated prior to the next meeting. Lindale explained the posed street was aligned so the fewest number of trees would be removed. Lindale stated with regard to drainage that their proposal cannot solve the areas storm water and drain problems; however, they can't make it worse, adding the proposed rain gardens are a critiol part of stormwater management for the site. Chair Platteter noted that another concern Wressed was sight line issues at the intersWion of Blake and the new road. Platteter ask , Lindale to comment on that. Ms. LindaWreported at the City's request WSB conducted a, `' ffic analysis. The report indicated that sight lines are sufficient. She further noted that the applicant will enter into a Developers Agreement that not only addresses sight lines and site access but addresses retaining walls, rain gardens, water and sewer too. Lindale said in the ?Weement maintenance of the proposed wall, rain gardens, etc. are addressed. In response to commenir rom neighbors on prior tree loss Steve Gross reported that the site was being cleared of W kthorn and dead trees. Motion VII. DEPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS /randview Presentatio Eomic Development Man r, Bill Neuendorf addressed the Commission and reported on elopment plannin r the former public works site. B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment U�j N `Chair Platteter suggested because of the late hour that the discussion on the Ordinance Amendments Z� Abe continued to the next Planning Commission meeting on April 22nd. Commissioners Agreed. VIII. CORRESPON NCE AND PETITIONS Chair Platteter acl<nowle d back of packet materials. IX. CHAIR D COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner est reported that last evening (April 7) the w ouncil approved the Wooddale Valley Vie all Area Plan. 7 • Commissioner Nemerov stated if the Commission was to aW6ve the preliminary plAt he would like it conditioned that the lots need to be develope d in compliance wit�it the tree ordinance. Commissioners agreed with that as a -qp d tion of approval. Motion Commissioner Lee moved to recommend preliminary plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include compliance with the Tree Ordinance. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner rrest asked the applicant tote very careful with the Bur Oak during the constructioAWase of the project. Chair PlI teter further requested thsolpecial attention was paid to condition d. "There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property." B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Lot Division procedure, Rezoning procedure, side yard setbacks, regulations, R -2 District regulations 2�'�\ Planner Presentation Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague to report on the revisions to the ordinance including Commissioner Forrest's window well information. Planner Teague reported that a definition has been added for window well. The definition would include all types of window wells. Commissioner Forrest commented that basically she would also like to see setbacks measured from the outer edge of the structure. Planner Teague told the Commission there were three revised items. • Define window well • In Section 3 — Plan modifications — what triggers return to the Planning Commission; • Non- conforming. Replacing duplex in the R -2 District — language added. In summary Teague clarified the following changes to each section: I ) Lot Division /Party Wall. This change would allow a lot division (adjustment to an existing lot line), and a party wall division of an existing duplex to be done administratively. Teague reported that the majority of Cities in the area process these types of request administratively. Teague further noted that this action doesn't create a new lot, only changes a lot line or allows the split of a duplex along the party wall to is facilitate separate owners. In both cases no building, etc. is involved with the split. 2) Window Well. Added a definition of window well. Page 5 of 7 3) Plan Modifications. This section was changed to clarify when site modifications should go back before the Planning Commission. Teague noted on page 5 strike all after site plan. 4) Procedure for Rezoning. This sections (4 &5) was amended to reduce the steps an applicant takes to receive final rezoning approval. Presently it's a two -step process and the amendment would create a swifter process for certain rezoning's from two -step to one and one half. 5) Building Coverage etc. (6 0). Revisions add clarity to building coverage exemptions and side yard setback requirement. Eliminate c. Interior side yard setback. 6) Section 8 — R -2 District Regulations. Teague said in this instance the suggestion is to allow single family homes in the R -2 zoning district. Currently the Code prohibits it. Teague said staff believes there is some disagreement from the Commission with the proposed change. 7) Building Height Section 9. Corrects an error on the table. 8) Nonconforming R -2 Lots. This changes allow duplexes on existing nonconforming R -2 lot to be torn down and rebuilt within the need for variance. nicrnccinn Commissioner Forrest said if the window well definition is approved she wants to reiterate she would like the setback measured from the outermost edge of the window well surrounding structure. Forrest also said she is hesitant on window wells on front facades and suggested that they be subject to the same setbacks as the main house. • Chair Platteter also commented he continues to support the additional public hearing; however, understands the time restraints. Platteter said that at this time he believes the Commission can vote on all items except for Section 8/R -2 District Regulations, adding that item should be voted on alone. Motion Commissioner Forrest moved to recommend approval of the proposed Ordinance Amendments to Chapter 32 and 36 of the Edina City Code excluding Section 8. R -2 District Regulations. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Carr moved to recommend approval of Section 8. R -2 District Regulations. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. A discussion ensued on Section 8. R -2 District Regulations with the majority of Commissioners expressing objection to the proposed change. Commissioners indicated if the change were permitted the diversity of the housing stock would change, affordability could be lost and the buffer zone into the R- I District shrunk. Commissioner Nemerov noted that the locations of Edina's R -2 zoning districts are scattered and depending on the area change could mean • different things. He suggested making a decision on this issue after adoption of Vision Edina. Page 6 of 7 • Chair Platteter called for the vote: Ayes; Carr. Nays; Hobbs, Lee, Nemerov, Olsen, Strauss, Platteter. Motion failed. • Page 7 of 7 o (Le �� leas ro iBBe To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.0 From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion N Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — Preliminary Plat With Lot Width And Area Variances, 5825 Ashcroft Avenue, Jeffrey and Janine Johnson, Resolution No. 2015 -49 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution No. 2015 -49, approving the Preliminary Plat with Variances. Planning Commission Recommendation: On April 22, 2015 the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat with Variances: Vote: 7 Ayes, 0 Nays. The Commission added a condition that both lots would be subject to the new Tree Ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Information /Background: (Deadline for Decision by the City: July 13, 2015) Janine and Jeffrey Johnson are proposing to subdivide their property at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A27 in the attached Planning Commission Staff Report.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. Both lots would gain access off Ashcroft Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,790 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would be just short of the median area. There are four significant trees on the site. Each one of these trees would be maintained as a result of the subdivision. There are two smaller Cherry Trees located along the north lot line that would also be saved. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2015 -49 • Planning Commission minutes, April 22, 2015 • Planning Commission staff report dated April 22, 2015 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-49 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES AT 5825 ASHCROFT AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Janine and Jeffrey Johnson are proposing to subdivide their property at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue into two lots. 1.02 The existing homes would be removed. 1.03 Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,790 square feet, median lot depth is 135 • feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would be just short of the median area. 17-� 1.04 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lots 17 and 18, Block 7 Fairfax, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 1.05 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Fairfax 4th Addition. 1.06 To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. 1.07 On April 22, 2015, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat and Variances, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff memo dated April 22, 2015. The Planning Commission added a condition that the applicant meets the City's recently adopted tree preservation ordinance. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Page 2 0 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and depth and nearly meet the median area. 3. The proposal would restore the property back to the form of the original plat, which included two lots. 4. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique practical difficulty to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, a 50 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. In addition, the applicant would be denied a subdivision with variances that has been previously approved with these same circumstances by the City in the last few years. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat and Lot Area and Width Variances for the proposed subdivision of 5825 Ashcroft Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive • a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: Page 3 E 0 a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated April 15, 2015 d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume of stormwater to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. Both lots shall be subject to the City's tree ordinance. Adopted this 6th day of May, 2015. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA • )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 4 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK • I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2015. City Clerk :7 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ; APRI 229 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Seeley, Strauss, Halva, Thors0, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Forrest and Platteter ' Absent: Olsen and Thorsen III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA ,,4,, Commissioner bbs moved approval of the Mar 'i5, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner Thorsen seconded t motion. All voted aye; motion cad. • COMMUNITY COMME None. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Subdivision. Janine and Jeffrey Johnson. 5825 Ashcroft Ave., Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Janine and Jeffrey Johnson are proposing to subdivide their property at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue into two lots. The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. To accommodate the request the following is required: I subdivision; 2 Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 31ot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. Teague explained that both lots would gain access off Ashcroft Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,790 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would be just short of the median area. There are four significant trees on the site. Each one of these trees would be maintained as a result of the subdivision. There are two smaller Cherry Trees located along the north lot line that would also be saved. Page 1 of 7 Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5825 Ashcroft Avenue and the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: I . Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and depth and nearly meet the median area. 3. The proposal would restore the property back to the form of the original plat, which included two lots. 4. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique practical difficulty to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. • d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use of his property, a 50 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. In addition, the applicant would be denied a subdivision with variances that has been previously approved with these same circumstances by the City in the last few years. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated April 15, 2015 • d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. Page 2 of 7 • e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw - cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Appearing for the Applicant Jeffrey and Janine Johnson, applicant and property owners Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented that she is having a hard time identifying the practical difficulty. She acknowledged that the Ordinance was changed after approval of the Fairfax plat, adding that revision was to direct change; reiterating she is unsure of the practical difficulties. Planner Teague explained in his opinion the practical difficulty is that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block, adding the proposed use as two lots is reasonable. Teague further noted that the subject lot is the only lot on this block where two fifty foot lots were developed as one. • Commissioner Lee also indicated she too was having trouble with practical difficulties. Continuing, Lee said in her opinion the practical difficulty is that this lot is being devalued because it is a 100 -foot lot on a block where the rest of the lots are 50 -feet. Concluding, Lee said she has no difficulty with the request for two fifty foot lots; however, can agree the one home on two lots is out of character for this block. Commissioner Nemerov asked if the large trees in the front (N -S) will stay. Planner Teague responded from his discussions with the applicant they indicated they intend to save those trees. Teague further noted that much would depend on driveway placement. Applicant Presentation Jeffrey Johnson introduced to the Commission his wife, Janine and realtor, Kim Melin. Johnson gave a brief history of his property and the Fairfax plat and with graphics pointed out the significance of the 500 -foot neighborhood and his property's location in that radius. Continuing, Johnson delivered a power point presentation highlighting the following • There are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance to allow reasonable use of the property. Without the granting of a variance they cannot do with their land what the neighboring property owners can do with the same land. • This property is twice the width and land area of every other lot in its block (Block 7 & is Block 8). Page 3 of 7 • The proposed subdivision and variance would create harmony because the lots would be of similar size to that of other lots within this neighborhood. • The character of the neighborhood would not be compromised because if divided the lot would now be of similar size to the majority of lots within the 500 -foot neighborhood. It was the original intent of the plat. • The subdivision meets all the standards set forth in the subdivision ordinance. With regard to the trees Johnson said it is their intent to retain the two trees. He said he believes the driveway can be poured in such a way as to save the tree on the north; however, he added both trees may be trimmed. Discussion Commissioner Hobbs asked Mr. Johnson if he spoke with neighbors about the project. Mr. Johnson responded in the affirmative. He reported that he held a neighborhood "open house" in March that was attended by two neighbors. Johnson said both neighbors indicated their support for the subdivision. Continuing, Hobbs further noted he received two e- mails; one in support and the other indicating they could not support the request on principle. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. • No one spoke to the issue. n U Commissioner Carr moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Discussion Commissioner Nemerov asked if the preliminary plat were approved what would the setbacks for the new home(s) be. Teague responded a recent change in ordinance dictates a 12 -foot total side yard setback with no less than 5 -feet on one side. 6 -6 or 7 -5 is what the City currently sees. Commissioner Carr stated she can support the request as submitted. She further added that she agrees with City staff on practical difficulties. Commissioner Forrest said while it's not unreasonable for the applicant to want two lots she continues to struggle with practical difficulties. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged the neighborhood is changing and currently there are teardowns within this area on 50 -foot lots; however, is skeptical on the practical difficulties but not strongly adverse to the request. Chair Platteter indicated he can support the request, adding it is reasonable. Page 4 of 7 Commissioner Nemerov stated if the Commission was to approve the preliminary plat he would like it conditioned that the lots need to be developed in compliance with the tree ordinance. Commissioners agreed with that as a condition of approval. Motion Commissioner Lee moved to recommend preliminary plat approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include compliance with the Tree Ordinance. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to be very careful with the Bur Oak during the construction phase of the project. Chair Platteter further requested that special attention was paid to condition d. "There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property." B. Zoning dinance Amendment - Lot Division procedure, Rezoning proceduride yard setbacks, regulations, R -2 District regulations ,6. Planner Presentation` S Chair Platteter asked Planner gue to report on the revisions to the ordinance including Commissioner Forrest's windo , II information. Plann Teague reported that a defini has been added for window well. The definition would Al de all types of window wells. mmissioner Forrest commented that basically she would also a to see setbacks measured f the outer edge of the structure. Planner Teague told the Commission there wer ree revised items. • Define window well • In Section 3 — Plan modifications — what triggers return to the Planning Commission; • Non - conforming. Replacing duplex in the R -2 District — language added. In summary Teague clarified the following changes to each section: I ) Lot Division /Party Wall. This change would allow a lot division (adjustment to an existing lot line), and a party wall division of an existing duplex to be done administratively. Teague reported that the majority of Cities i1tthe area process these types of request administratively. Teague further noted that this action doesn't create a new lot, only changes a lot line or allows,the split of a duplex along the party wall to facilitate separate owners. In both cases ho building, etc. is involved with the split. • 2) Window Well. Added a definition of window well. Page 5 of 7 0 , o e �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague April 22, 2015 VI.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Janine and Jeffrey Johnson are proposing to subdivide their property at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue into two lots. (See property location on pages Al —A4.) The existing home would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A5 —A27.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. Both lots would gain access off Ashcroft Avenue. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 6,790 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 50 feet. (See attached median calculations on pages A25- A27.) The new lots would meet the median width and depth, but would be just short of the median area. There are four significant trees on the site. Each one of these trees would be maintained as a result of the subdivision. There are two smaller Cherry Trees located along the north lot line that would also be saved. (See pages A27 -A29.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low - density residential. 0 • • Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single - family home and attached garage. (See page A4.) The home would be removed. There are four significant trees on the site today. These trees would remain. (See page A27.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (See memo from the city engineer on page A31.) There would be very minimal grading to accommodate the two new homes. The new homes would be located primarily where the existing home sits today on this relatively flat site. Very little grading would occur in the rear yards. Stormwater from the proposed homes, driveways, and the westerly half of the lots shall drain to Ashcroft Avenue. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring properties. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page A30.) The following is the history in the past nine years: 2 Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,000 s.f. 75 ft 135 ft. Lot 1 6,781 s, f. * 50 ft* 135 ft. Lot 2 6,781 s. f.* 50 ft* 135 ft. * Variance Required Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (See memo from the city engineer on page A31.) There would be very minimal grading to accommodate the two new homes. The new homes would be located primarily where the existing home sits today on this relatively flat site. Very little grading would occur in the rear yards. Stormwater from the proposed homes, driveways, and the westerly half of the lots shall drain to Ashcroft Avenue. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring properties. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. Specific hook -up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in the Area The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this area. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests on page A30.) The following is the history in the past nine years: 2 • Requested Subdivisions in the last five years 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66 -foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50 -foot lots by Bravura Construction; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100 -foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 0 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50 -foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide. Please note above, that #7, the most recent request for a subdivision, is located two blocks south of the subject property. However, the median for that site is 10,028 square feet and the median of the subject property is 6,790 square feet. That is due to the larger lots adjacent to and south of the property at 5945 Concord. Primary Issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical • difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that the subject property is double the size of all lots on this block. This area was originally plated with all 50 -foot lots, including the subject property. (See page A32.) This is the only lot on this block that developed as one home over two platted 50 -foot wide lots. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood and original plat. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of his • property of which the lots would be the same as existing lots in the area and specifically on this block and the lots directly across the street. (See page A3 and A32.) As demonstrated on page A25 -A26, the median lot size in this neighborhood is 50 feet wide, 135 feet deep and 6,790 square feet in size. The proposed lots would be 50 feet wide, 135 feet deep and 6,781 square feet in size, which nearly meet the medians. The City of Edina has also granted similar variances within this area. In 2009, a similar subdivision and variances were granted at 5920 Oaklawn, and in 2011 at 5829 Brookview Avenue. Please note that the median lot size and width were similar in those instances. To deny the subject variances would deny the applicant a subdivision that has been recently approved by the City. (See approved subdivisions on page A30.) b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? The condition of this oversized lot is generally unique to Ashcroft Avenue between 58th and 59th on both sides of the street. All of these lots except the subject property are 50 feet wide and generally 6,700 square feet in size. The • circumstance of the oversized lot was not created by the applicant. The original builder of the home decided to build on two 50 -foot lots. rd 0 c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Again, all the lots on this block are 50 feet wide. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5825 Ashcroft Avenue and the lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for each lot, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,781 square feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The subdivision would meet the neighborhood medians for lot width and depth and nearly meet the median area. • 3. The proposal would restore the property back to the form of the original plat, which included two lots. 4. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique practical difficulty to the property caused by the existing size of the property which is two times the size of every lot on the block. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including every lot on the block. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. C. The proposed lots would be the same size as the lots were originally platted. d. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. e. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a use • of his property, a 50 -foot wide lot, which is common to the area. In addition, the applicant would be denied a subdivision with variances 5 • that has been previously approved with these same circumstances by the City in the last few years. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb -cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated April 15, 2015 40 d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb -to -curb and from saw -cut to saw -cut. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Deadline for a City Decision: July 13, 2015 • 10 • • i y. - ^IT IA arH SIt wesr y 6("1 l RHHI4CE } ,i _..:it - F1 LL ER ST !' i I hill LPIt l �I�IfIT TT 1H ST 8 E E , F S' �� TT t ?l ' C`Ak t1AIfE StF.IhT .vE S.T { O _ - lE?'IrJ it Ti .Apr Mtlf _ 1� i CA ' 1 .. � � i I I ,f '- ,� I• StTH STFIIT I51 t. > Z .y TTH S�TPFET 1'Sr K v PHIL6Ri?aF LA"vE -] IH 5TFEET ;• F T _ - - Z y]jr]II L ,r r w I BENT,7N VENUE , ° , j_ - _ ` > LE ft' ?:tIH SIPEL{ Y L [ ii n11H IhlLt t��E�.l X CHOLL FOAfld i _ Q i� Pty hark > 3 J I FV f rEF( LA F16_ 1 jC t 4 S 61 Sr 0 RE e't i f S t _. 7 ,� 'ri - t 4 0. 1 BIRCH. PF i L•41 "vE •.�„ I _ I 1.XI. ,? __ _ �, _ r� - }! —_ L NO cT k c EST ti`__. D j c v - W > il" d i. _ ° w V( I I I y 4 U_ _ iAD,`OX liAS,E ! i -.1 y 4 -- -- ... ] ]_. I iiW (Z. �] w x C3FU LrPFET 0i E C I i S " �, ...� : C:TTH STfi FrI 1 ±LS1 x _ j +Y r - fa1H SLF.l LT.. "EcT d J _ M - Rosl and Park I Parcel 19- 028 -24 -31 -0062 ID: Owner J & J Johnson Name: Parcel 5825 Ashcroft Ave Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,577 sq ft Map Scale: 1" = 1600 ft. N Print Date: 4/13/2015 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A Think - Green! • ,� .v ES� -- r- SCH O- L.'ROAD , s ,I Parcel 19- 028 -24 -31 -0062 ID: Owner J & J Johnson Name: Parcel 5825 Ashcroft Ave Address: Edina, MN 55424 �a Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N Print Date: 4/13/2015 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A ThinkGreeri! Property Residential Type: t iHome- Homestead � stead: Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,577 sq ft �a Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N Print Date: 4/13/2015 -(k This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 A ThinkGreeri! • • 0 5701 51400 4810 4621 ! 4617 4613 4609 4605 4601 - - = 5717 5717 _ �4U16 j 5721 5724 r 5721 4620 - , 4612 4608 4FJ34 4600 5721 5725 5728 I 5725 5801 5805 5809 5817 5821 5825 5829 5833 5837 w 5841 w 0 5901 j u 5935 I 5909 913 I ! 5917 5921 I Parcel 19- 028 -24 -31 -0062 ID: Owner J & J Johnson Name: Parcel 5825 Ashcroft Ave Address: Edina, MN 55424 Property Residential Type: Home- Homestead stead: Parcel 0.31 acres Area: 13,577 sq ft 5800 5804 5808 5812 5816 5820 5824 5828 5832 5-,836 5840 5844 5801 5805 5809 5813 5817 5821 5825 5829 5833 5837 - 5841 5845 _��... 5801 5800 - 5801 5800 -- 5900 5805 5804 5101 5900 5804 5901 5805 j 5809 5808 5809 5808 5904 5813 5812 _. -5817 # 59(15 5904 5812 5 7 5 5813 5908 5816 590 9 5908 5817 5816 - 5908 w 5 SO 9 5912 - - 5821 5820 5913 i— - 5820 5913 5821 5824 5916 5825 5824 J 5916 5825 I 5917 - -- 5917 5916 I 5917 5829 5828 5828 5920 5833 5832 - 5921 5920 5832- - - -- 5833 5837 5836 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N _.5836 -__ 5837 Uj -�� 5841_ 5840 _ I 5845 ( 5844 5841 5840 5844 5845 x LjL 54TH STREET WEST 5801 5805 5809 5813 5817 5821 5825 5829 5833 5837 - 5841 5845 _��... p - -- - -. -- 5900 5101 5900 5901 5900 5901 5904 d # 59(15 5904 5 7 5 5904 w 51- 5 5908 590 9 5908 5908 w 5 SO 9 5912 5913 i— - 5913 5912 X 5913 5916 - 5916 I 5917 - -- 5917 5916 I 5917 5920 5921 5920 - -- 5920 5921 Map Scale: 1" = 200 ft. N Print Date: 4/13/2015 A3 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Think GreetV L' • • Owners' Statement in Support of Request for Variance 9 1)Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. If approved, the proposed variance would allow for two 50 -foot wide residential lots. This is considered to be a reasonable land use for this neighborhood. Many of the lots in this neighborhood and other areas of the City are 50 -foot wide lots. Without the granting of this requested variance a practical difficulty exists because the applicant /property owners cannot do with their land what the neighboring property owners can do with the same land area of identically zoned land. The size of this lot of record is twice the size of most lots in its neighborhood and that has created its unique practical difficulty. 2)Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. This property is one of only two 100 -foot wide lots within the identified 500 -foot ring neighborhood. It is twice the width and land area of every other lot in its block (Block 7, Fairfax). It is twice the width and land area of every lot that faces it on the opposite side of Ashcroft Avenue (east half of Block 8, Fairfax). Additionally, every lot that is part of the Ashcroft Avenue streetscape, within this 500 -foot neighborhood ring, is 49 or 50 feet in width (Blocks 7, 8, part of Block 9, and part of Block 10). 3)Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. The proposed subdivision and variance would meet the intent of zoning as it would create 40 two lots of similar size to that of other lots within this neighborhood. The proposed subdivision and variance would restore this land to its originally platted condition of two 50 -foot wide lots. 4)Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood. If granted, the proposed subdivision of this property would create two lots that would conform in width, depth, and land area with its neighborhood. The proposed lots are consistent with the median lot width, depth, and land area of the neighborhood lots; a) proposed lots are 50 feet wide and the median lot width in the neighborhood is 50 feet, b) proposed lots are 136 feet in depth and the median lot depth in the neighborhood is 136 feet, and c) proposed lots have land areas of 6,788 and 6,789 square feet and the median lot area in this neighborhood is 6,790 square feet. Of the 106 neighborhood lots, 11 are 49 feet wide and 72 are 50 feet wide. More than 3 of every 4 of the neighborhood lots are about the same size as the proposed lots. If this subdivision and variance were not granted it would perpetuate a lot that is twice the size of typical lots within this neighborhood and it would forever be out of characte_Cwith this neighborhood. The proposed subdivision and granting of lot -width variance would r. ait ift two lots that are more characteristic of the neighborhood than the existing lo V AS- R 5825 Ashcroft Avenue Subdivision and Variance requests • Located in the Concord Neighborhood • East of Highway 100 &West of Wooddale Ave • Owners: Janine &Jeff Johnson — Edina residents since June 1980 — Purchased this property in July 1981 • • • A-7 • • 0 �1 V a 0 5825 Ashcroft Avenue Subdivision and Variance requests • Current legal description —Lots 17 & 18, Block 7, Fairfax, Hennepin County • North lot (Lot 18) purchased and 3- bedroom rambler style home was built in 1953 • South lot purchased in 1954 and building permit pulled to construct a breezeway — In 1956 another building permit was issued for a breezeway and garage • • 5825 Ashcroft Avenue Subdivision and Variance requests • • Analysis of 500 -foot Ring Neighborhood • Other than the subject property, there is only one 100 -foot wide lot in this neighborhood — 100 feet wide: 5841 Concord Avenue South • cx 31MY/DPW IJA • 30MV XVAIVA irsa* S*W ti re k(a Analysis of 500 -foot Ring Neighborhood • There are ten lots greater than 75 feet wide — 92 feet wide: 5721 Concord Avenue South — 83 feet wide: 4600 58t" Street West — 80 feet wide: 4620 58t" Street West — 80 feet wide: 4616 58th Street West — 80 feet wide: 4612 58th Street West — 80 feet wide: 4606 58th Street West — 80 feet wide: 4604 58th Street West — 80 feet wide: 5725 St. Johns Avenue South — 75 feet wide: 5905 St. Johns Avenue South — 75 feet wide: 5913 St. Johns Avenue South jl� MUM alp A . AMS AV13" k. rPJWAX AIM" 0 0 • 0 0 0 Analysis of 500 -foot Ring Neighborhood • There are six lots greater than 50 feet wide — 70 feet wide: 5809 Concord Avenue South — 67 feet wide: 5908 St. Johns Avenue South — 67 feet wide: 5916 St. Johns Avenue South — 65 feet wide: 5805 Concord Avenue South — 59 feet wide: 5801 Concord Avenue South — 55 feet wide: 5817 Concord Avenue South • 3mMY XVAIRJ ', i �� Vii■ f �• � � ,i t • , I a � ( � • 4 —fit, ,'L. LI , ITM-11Y tow Ar Id Fal - .•...i, _.,.o-., r i 1 J•� �- i � � � rT � c � � '1^ r.�l cal a 1 � !! '� • e y • i fi I , �• z 8Syy 33 ` u,.rt�Sy .- etx FAY CA '�� ' Y ' .y''i. • � Nil 1L .may le ! f r • { G rw sr A{ va _ g !7_ 0 Analysis of 500 -foot Ring Neighborhood • • All of the remaining eighty -one (81) lots in this neighborhood are either 50 feet wide or 49 feet wide —All lots on the subject block are 50 foot wide lots — All lots across Ashcroft Avenue from the site are 50 foot wide lots — All lots that would have a view of this property are 50 foot wide lots • 7-7 W If 3rt4l%V CW�PaYs) Sol M P. 3-my Sum .,Ls%i % -pl I'l 41 f- r Ps 7 '1 Ja M t) .0 a • r o cu m CCU > E - cz 0 oc a s co cy CA Ja W +-A no 75 s v OT) 00 an C. 4-3 U m > CL 0 CJ CL) 0 > AC 0 c un C- cu 000 w C ro COO -0:7 0 OV) (Ij -L: u 4-J V) 0) m (WE 4-J m CL o CL CL CL Ja 4-1 u 0 0 m 0 -W 4-0 •i E m U M C +j 0 r. r 0 0 X 0 LO Lm o 0 L. U CL > LANE) Ln JC� LE 'Cull All) W- C) MJ' � jo Tj- Ja o J-C at) (lo 3 C -3) o IOU (CD L= X: CC) Q) Vo CT a (JO u 0 ro C 0 OM Mz COD JC Qj > < C c 0 0 • Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance, T h e p r000s� s- u io v s cn an n 61 ,, arc a�IC e IJ\V 0 'E'1'11- O U 0 � � e r E � o n' � S V/ 0 o ,'' r `� o 1217 ��'��� 0 � { r i I ° of o � u U '7 r s'z t ` % Elm on b.,) o,( r h o o T 0- J i) G � o C1 'r ,�� co e: `� S � r- Go e', U � cc, �� ��' J o i� I� �� � i � ,. o �1) i� V� (� j� �I �:� 1�I��j I �� �, �i i � _� _.._.� I � I I� ♦ t IJ;- c_.,J "C' CJ J \ 1�� a fJ :,II J �:.� l.� i1G,.!� l:�..% IJ efh:% i; �<; 11 tl'J J'i ,'�`.! l h.� �: >i1 (�`J...J IJ ..,J 0 0 0 Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood. 0 `F gr2 -, n t cs di, tl_ h e pr o p o s e d s b di v 1 si 0 n o,, f `11 h ` s P r o P e r,L"(- 11 / I , 10 � p 'o �� J �'� _ j' � �j � /( /J '�J r \gym a � � r� \,`;/Fl/ c') �.. } `� Ij�' 11 I / ^ t s `��� �W � t ���jjj � I d ® M I (p'�� �j{' � {j' fj'�_`I I �� ®�® �({� c tl tl U U tJ Il U � L ll ®i Y i (J t h., depth, and � area--,j vlv�t �ts T h to p r p on �'e c ,C ' 'Es 0 81 C S C r � L-7-D L- e n L t h h m e d a n 'dth dep-1-IR n a Ca c arez) of the n '�ghb rho � � a) proposed dots are 50 feet vyAde a ind the median I ®t width the ne�ghboPplh "o'( d �s 50 feet, tsare 1� -Feet yin depth ,�iii the median lot proposed depth �n the n e o g h b o� hooc1l �,s 11 E5" 6, fee���g and c) proposed] 89 square �r ®���e��J Jo��� ��a�e �a��9 areas ���� '�� � � ae��j 6� he e �� L'I'Ms c ei r` o ®d is 6,79 ��eet ac��� ¢� �� ����oa� ��� area i� ��� square feet. 0 0 0 Not alter the essential Character of the neighborhood, I_ 6. of t h e 7 " EP), e e e L V / " �/ Cj: ( E'. o r e t h a n, 2 o, � � U Z C a V(P r'' borhood �o' are ne�g�l -cs a cabOLF"- 'the ssame s'�,ze \as the proposed 8ot-s. If t h is s u bd ivi si o r, a, n( a, rr ,a n ce � ve re non -tr g raj nted it would p e r p et u a t e a � o a s 't ,JtI7 �i c, e -t h e s i z e o -F -t �j P i EA q_j o Ls, �\Pni i -Nn this ne�ghborhood and it wou�d forever be o L,,i on C, i'l, i � r, 77-,, c 7, t e r " t h t h 1s r, , e h b- o r The proposed subdFv4s�on grantin t- �Nvidt h \, � za T ca , n ,e %, An; o U � d r e s L � � t on t w o di r La more 0 0 of'- -,the -the o 0 • • F- PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: FAIRFAX 4TH ADDITION EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: u. tr.ym M 1ga.n.r.a] ma n•'a ar.wa�n t11i.N mom. 'a n. n.qM roa 7 N ma rm .ala camty ma stal. �y p�rto�mr ..motwnwgrmrwEprwJ��awmum. ma .wmt.�r. a r.ora. Hauatigm Mf �o! tiv wl�irlr 60 Mt a M wM.tr ENO f«l aLN1E,D ] y, Seta. xmxyn c=lop; Mbn..otd. TO BE PLATTED AS: lob t ma 2 9 1, FNIEAI( 41H MR10K H4 b C .t% YYnweta. SUBDIVISION SUMMARY: 111. told rI.,6w a b b .Wd b 2 ]M bbl anq b 13JN2 PROPOSED AREA S11. o«a tot t. EI«A 1, FASSAx 4111 ADd11011 .wa. E,]El .w.. b.l . a1M aa.. SR. arsq 14t 2 9odt 1. fNRFA% 41N AOg1101t .Wab E,]EI .P�a. fwt - 0.16E aa.a GENERAL NOTES: W�4 r�YmM w�xlrwrw. sp«rsr 1 �. w«! « hM nv.x. IM1. a Yrr,. - RwnY Mt py. L1ih Ix9t DNSI.) rr ay a u.a n«�ir nr�> �r.aMlan.� Ybifw �yYM MW.�r��v.�4 �w. Whp ��W.M wY �.ti row w^iNTwMYYw�yM M.«N. •DaM «IM nwf �ye�..MRA,.t «. a•M Nryr .�..a.+t w. w. s.b.✓•. r IteW ew..valxw _ _ m`bN°'w r.F d %d w t4xEH w R4xA» PROPOSED - DRAINAGE & UTILITY e EASEMENT DETAIL cFTjJn L LEGEND •1 ) PrepMY 4wumml I I —.. 'd Inc , xo u�4a�.w %e ]annm. .xl4ss gtxmwz Ixwulw� w` I°d�M° 1q -- Sa:llary 5..r VICINITY MAP 9 A4 Condtimhq Unil DxNUw. T« (Dlvndr N InaA«) w EmF�+xl`I BYCOnIwr � un9 tpM EDlewit 4Ltln m pro�Pmn x p a cool «r xm m (114ao) a Dran=o• Ma. (lox ula.) is ti SCALE: 1INCH= 10 FEET REVISIONS i n.r.by a «tlly that Nla .any. plan er H — P-.. b1nm� amPOpaul y wDrNYm n y Regl.ix.4 Lm4 5ureyar un4er N. laws of the SS.lab .1 NNn.xla h wEH11 -No. , LS Nn.wb R.. 2]ETI Dab: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FAIRFAX 4TH ADDITION For: JEFFREY & JANINE JOHNSON SITE: 5825ASHCROF7AVENUE —.A. MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY HARRY S. JOHNSON 9803 Ly9a41. Avenue South Sloomi19toO, MN. 55437 T.1.. 952- 084 -5341 Fax 952-984 -5344 wwwn•I•umy.n. «m .-- 1 OF 1 • • /r W X W f" W O J H 0 O .cf �W Q S' I— O J W O a W 4 °m II x V h g -------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------- ------ --- --- --- AA���� !•._l���� tR�q��171it EAN�Ag1R2AA ?q# #:t 99€ R'dRRRRRRRBCRRRR89888%j�9 °yR:: ART.` y8 ARRR8 S8RRSg888RRRASAASpASASRBRRARAgBy° RRRSABRRRRR °yR9RRR88SR°yABRR °y8RS8 xR e 5gg gapq ��8g �BARgRRRkGGGGC: tlGGGFk�+.' GGFGkGkG.`: kGGCk ;CFGGG,3•A•••••••gg••••1�1���1 1 �qy �g� q�� ����9g�3g SR8RASSS� gRAR SRSR Same R rBR''''�� '''�''BRARR8RA�8RR Sa8 8RRARR�SA 8A8R888��S WARMS �i a LU a a �{E �- �( II Yg (Z I �i 9F 3 6.?•� S 31V 3JMI7iJ 3 3 LE>e F !i RIF ' §'' $o��91�tgg i��l � §� � � §� ,• � §y, ��a_ � §' k .y tag _ kry 14, IN, io � §! ! °' 7 •ES s �g � a O W ti U J gr J I.7e - "7 - �7ylt k k k y k y^ k8y kry kry k,;y: !yn kry °� ¢ o x w e z 9Y$ I I w - gip `_�5 g -------- - - - - -- ---------------------------------- ------ --- --- --- AA���� !•._l���� tR�q��171it EAN�Ag1R2AA ?q# #:t 99€ R'dRRRRRRRBCRRRR89888%j�9 °yR:: ART.` y8 ARRR8 S8RRSg888RRRASAASpASASRBRRARAgBy° RRRSABRRRRR °yR9RRR88SR°yABRR °y8RS8 xR e 5gg gapq ��8g �BARgRRRkGGGGC: tlGGGFk�+.' GGFGkGkG.`: kGGCk ;CFGGG,3•A•••••••gg••••1�1���1 1 �qy �g� q�� ����9g�3g SR8RASSS� gRAR SRSR Same R rBR''''�� '''�''BRARR8RA�8RR Sa8 8RRARR�SA 8A8R888��S WARMS �i a LU a a �{E �- �( II Yg (Z I �i 9F 3 6.?•� Stw us S 31V 3JMI7iJ 3 3 !i RIF ' §'' $o��91�tgg i��l � §� � � §� ,• � §y, ��a_ � §' k .y tag _ kry 14, IN, io � §! ! 7 iJ �J pp J gp J y'q J gr J I.7e - "7 - �7ylt k k k y k y^ k8y kry kry k,;y: !yn kry key k.y 9Y$ I I Stw us ONI '40 NORNHOr 'S A:3HV,'A 1 C4 r WKf g!ti +YK4 - - - - -- •J S 31V 3JMI7iJ 3 3 sag 3s�1 ' §'' $o��91�tgg i��l � §� � � §� ,• � §y, ��a_ � §' k .y tag _ kry 14, IN, io � §! ! 7 iJ tiyJ I.7e R�J .g 9Y$ I I ONI '40 NORNHOr 'S A:3HV,'A 1 C4 r WKf g!ti +YK4 - - - - -- •J S 31V 3JMI7iJ 3 3 sag 3s�1 ' §'' � §� i��l � §� � � §� ,• � §y, ��a_ � §' J ") 9Y$ I I ONI '40 NORNHOr 'S A:3HV,'A 1 C4 r WKf g!ti +YK4 - - - - -- •J �J 4WIV WAWA 3f:a -. StilOf` '1ST. j / /3(tiaAY .LAY s 0 S 31V 3JMI7iJ 3 3 � R S 31Y I.dONJFISv 3nv �rJro ODl M1H �J 4WIV WAWA 3f:a -. StilOf` '1ST. j / /3(tiaAY .LAY s 0 1 - I -- I �c _ I 1 5913 CONCORD AV 6,789 50 ,moo 135.8 5721 CONCORD AV 10,923 92 120 4620 58TH ST. W. 10,989 80 137.4 4616 58TH ST. W. 10,994 80 137.4 4612 58TH ST. W. 10,998 8p 137.5 46M 58TH ST. W. 11,002 Bd' 137.5 4804 08TH ST. W 11,007 80 137.8 46M 58TH ST. W. 11,457 811 137.6 5721 ST. JOHNS AV 10,544 78.1 137.6 5725 ST. JOHNS AV 10,752 80.1 135.3 5900 ST. JOHNS AV 8,633 48.8 13418 5904 ST. JOHNS AV 6,792 50 135.8 5908 ST. JOHNS AV 9,102 67 135.8 5916 ST. JOHNS AV 9,103 67 135.9 5901 ST. JOHNS AV 6,625 48.8 135.8 5905 ST. JOHNS AV 10,194 75 135.8 5913 ST. JOHNS AV 10,194 75 135.8 5800 ST. JOHNS AV 6,623 48.8 135.6 5804 ST. JOHNS AV 6,781 50 135.6 5808 ST. JOHNS AV 6,782 50 135.6 5812 ST. JOHNS AV 6,783 50 135.7 5816 ST. JOHNS AV 6,784 50 135.7 5820 ST. JOHNS AV 6,781 50 135.7 5824 ST. JOHNS AV 6,789 50 135.7 5828 ST. JOHNS AV 6,789 50 135.7 5832 ST. JOHNS AV 6,783 so 13&7 5836 ST. JOHNS AV 6,788 50 1357 5840 ST. JOHNS AV 6,788 50 135.8 5844 ST. JOHNS AV 8,789 50 135.8 5801 ST. JOHNS AV 6,625 48.8 135.8 5805 ST. JOHNS AV 6,791 50 135.8 5809 ST. JOHNS AV 6,791 50 135.8 5813 ST. JOHNS AV 6,791 50 135.8 5817 ST. JOHNS AV 6,791 50 135.8 5821 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5825 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5829 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5833 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5837 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5841 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5845 ST. JOHNS AV 6,790 50 135.8 5800 FAIRFAX AV 6,620 48.7 135.8 5804 FAIRFAX AV 8,791 50 135.8 5808 FAIRFAX AV 6,791 50 135.8 5812 FAIRFAX AV 6,791 50 135.8 5816 FAIRFAX AV 6,791 50 135.8 5820 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5824 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5828 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5832 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.6 5836 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5840 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5844 FAIRFAX AV 6,790 50 135.8 5900 FAIRFAX AV 8,818 48.7 135.8 5904 FAIRFAX AV 6,789 50 135.8 5800 ASHCROFT AV 6,648 48.9 135.8 5804 ASHCROFT AV 8,791 50 135.8 5808 ASHCROFT AV 6,791 50 135.8 5812 ASHCROFT AV 8,791 50 135.8 5816 ASHCROFT AV 6,791 50 135.8 5820 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5824 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5828 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5832 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5836 ASHCROFT AV 8,790 50 135.8 5840 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5844 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5801 ASHCROFT AV 6,830 48.9 135.6 5805 ASHCROFT AV 6,782 50 135.6 5809 ASHCROFT AV 6,783 50 135.7 5813 ASHCROFT AV 6,783 50 135.7 5817 ASHCROFT AV 8,784 50 135.7 5821 ASHCROFT AV 6,789 50 135.7 5833 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.7 5837 ASHCROFT AV 6,791 50 135.7 5841 ASHCROFT AV 6,787 50 135.7 5845 ASHCROFT AV 6,788 50 135.7 5900 ASHCROFT AV 6,644 48.9 135.8 5904 ASHCROFT AV 6,789 50 135.8 5908 ASHCROFT AV 5,789 50 135.8 5912 ASHCROFT AV 8,789 50 135.8 5915 ASHCROFT AV 6,789 50 135.8 5901 ASHCROFT AV 6,637 48.9 135.8 5905 ASHCROFT AV 6,789 50 135.8 5909 ASHCROFT AV 6.790 50 135.6 5913 ASHCROFT AV 6,790 50 135.8 5917 ASHCROFT AV 6,791 50 135.8 7,396 54.5 135.7 MEDIAN: 6,790 50 135.8 GENERAL NOTES: Invwttwy De*nttlare per Crq of Eam S*dv im AppRoaUm Yedlaa 7M vdoe IA an Ode set of such vakm bdm *kh ad above whid thaw Is an wd m� vduejm or the aRfmetio mom of tM bro rtWN vokm If ewe In no am Lot Area The a w NA the W IMs oKkWw of IaW booted bdorr the ardlimy ter aaW elevation of WW% porW% and stniane. Lot Depth: 7M hariomW dstaios betnewr tM midpoint of tM Bart tot live and tM midpoint of tM rear tat ttlre. 7M greater *a AOP of a gamer lot Is Its depth and Mom tantope is Ite rrldtlt, Lot Ndit The dletmov bete aide lot tires meaund at rW MKW to the WW �!!` ,'depth at a point of 8o feet *am the *art lot tire. SCALE. ° IIN REVI, Date: I hereby certify that report was prepared direct supervision on, Registered Land Sury of the State of Minn h Thomas E. Hodorff, L Minnesota Reg. No. 2 Date: t" u 2" 500 ' PROPEF FO FAIRFAX 4Th Fai JEFFREY & JOHNS SITI 5825ASHCROJ EDINA, MINK HENNEPIN I 1PQ i aisE `. , • aelml- rnnm TO BE PLF • \ \\ and Z 0 B 1811. D 1 2 FORT DRIVEWAY EASEIAENT LOG 1 r I h5, - - -__�_ r-OVER E 50 FEET OF W. 90 FEET E%ISi(NG I asp I yo ` PER DEED (DOG NO. 1734449) GA A I I � 1 9 n ! I I r ar h,h I S 80. 42'0' E 135.70 i �� m� / I I - _ - - - -- ___ -- — The cord ream -- _ _ - ---- - - - ___ - -- a 28.1 I 25 330 - --- - - 3.s 30 I PROPOSE I ao SIG area Lot iSite area Lot ; M1 --------------- III II /// sj I s9lLDNeo1ADr +- - I I I (PAD ALE m nit 3m.) I FlNISHED FLOOR p - s I I I M FF 1SF LEVEL amoo l ELEv.- 885.39 / I FINISHED FLOOR_ I R oARAiE: sew A) 68 1, - I �• • I ELEV.-885.38 ��` I / 88 - ✓ -,I I 5825 A6HCROFT AVENUE ® �\ 0 1 -STORY MOUSE , ' , % I I n FOOTPRINT AREA - 1.606 SQ. FT. ,S9 p0 \\.• I GE e I` j � III 12 II'110rOSm Y 01510110 "am I / I _ -. i sET � 1 I I• ee,l � +1 ssa� �•\ I ?IT p a9 Map I 311 rtJ lu Ij ° 1 N 89.404fi_- _\135.71 `\ s \ 0\ W - -- Sw G 1 \I I r "Cr T -- -- - - - -=' r«sHEO -F - -- I \ / x-. t---= _ I� III aa� \\ Z - -- "`564— - - }---I 1 6 ildll a bit. yy eea.D I I r � -- ---- ------ �I - so dm 9a'z - - " I .. I 1n d e 0 I • N }�12 I �?S _ -•.- I / -- 7- -- i � ?8 I I I I - tn. l FlNISHED FLOOR_ I / suEnelo rAD ' � '' I ` J X . -' / I I PIM ( i ELEV.- ae3.J3 M neADARNq,2M a - -- - % -r- e- i i j' T R EAR wS /� °) F�� ---- --- -- - -- I a n n� I \ -- - -I -- °' 1 .c I I j L &m rww - - - - -- tl2.01D --- ________I._ 23,1 I 1 v� e O I 00 I I ' h L 6 Nm eryG" �¢� I` we- -- -�a' -- l a I I I 100.1 3s.x - - - - - -- 12 l(Dar DHVCMIY _ a _ ; 1 -- I6�. E — 1 - ay< so n g 1f1• * —2WAt[ - ma ` II / /� � — •— - � �1 Q I _ ;-7 W 135.72 0 � • f I \-w 9 MEN STING 4 HOU RBI LEGEND FOLIM , NrJ I • Prop-rt. ITE ADDRESS 325 Ashcroft Avenue am FINISHED FLOOR X ♦ �J\ —1) '-- I LA Concret t Tina, Minnesota 55424 TOP OFNNAMARK I ELEV. =985.91 -1 ���F MnC. IWNER ELEV..aaz.10 `^ �- - I - -- �m� Undergr ONTACJanlne Johnson I , ,. I . S'r . r�F (g� . � , - - -- — ._ —. -.- - -a - -o— Undergr water Gas i12) 741 -8045 — __ -__ 31 9,�,"�1 � V I _— _ —.�._ ❑ Storm Electric 325 Ashcroft Avenue 34.7 I •¢ Hydrant tfna. Minnesota 55424 � ® Air con Declduo [TRVEYOR — — — — — — — — — — — u`Se"u^5T� �, - - — — - 871 Conifero -7 S. Johnson Co., In I e 3aniic. ONTACT I - - gas - - - -� - y Existing Nn Hodorff (952) 884 -5341 311 X 851.27G Existing .__ - I nom•} a _ % 934.3 Existing q* nk a •+ •;art �• r �'t:; jai E C ��Sl yl•' �.I�.ell .. Ily j� c ? l I\ r f e� �6•i- V �t' `fir s .I► •lC3 ��•� ,�- R4€"'s; � �` raj � �,. ���'� t � f �' �y I Wit. ♦ � !Y r �'p eti � 1 r �` _ . _ ,ts � Pkt, Jh c' x:.^.41 '► Wit,(y -� x \':�'.;e _�.:` -'�'�„ -. • �Zd �VF•�'k;9,.a•_'� �� + /;mac +� I,..� '�' '� -'4•� . ` � ; • } {� �l � {qty .��r / n n �� ��� • `, At 'o � �1' Fi�'m� l ilk �A� � 1 ,' �y'[i •'t•� � . Y-C •Zj OF2 KO Syr 1 m i✓�6 aL K ♦ > li5�if,� �,�. tii• ¢ 1 .Ga►¢ 055' a +' °�. €J+� tt�t +' 17, ��h �� k`'` •�` g� yal �' :. -a tt:►� 1^►Idi! F+ , t 40 iY S ''k� JlINN :'F is S; ' I � , �yl� �` ��,VEa�kas.awF��; ��rf..'• 7 /�f,f�' , �ii � N t 5 - ti< • N,yl' t `• 1 +. d INAt 1 _. ice.:- ^xa '+�tg1G'Sk•�,j 4 >l�� �t,. ,-;t ._'lid t '4d�-Sl. ,ti, 'i \<(�i`•/`/ � � �c , I '. _ r�� �4��. sl- � o 1 . � sPd•�..• t•ft¢ I. !I g-- __.__.- ��FP �'1 �:•r 4WJ % 'I rP'• / ��j3TY� � c 3 I i �b• =- ��tril� I � L .. � t ,f, r \�`��•e Q Y � r5.: � it +� � � '!i t l fti� r1i � `: 1��• - . �b° ��` /P�- �.�.�`'�:e�i''m ��?�` �' � �I�T� I VIII ' ) 1 "Y. � • -j'. !i•:� yr JR� Pip�� �t � � .ham „ ... P7S'• f�' � � � ' � . f y It �;'��� � a,StiY��Y gyp) ✓�' fe:_, Il I. ,. 1M-I NAN i. , C1.241 S tio� 0 S14S C 0 • DATE: April 15, 2015 TO: Cary Teague — Community Development Director CC: Chad Millner PE — City Engineer FROM: Charlie Gerk EIT — Environmental Engineering Technician RE: Berman Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject development for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. General Comments I. None Survey/ Plat 2. None Traffic and Street 3. A curb cut permit from the engineering department will be required for each driveway. 4. The streets were reconstructed during the 2009 construction season. Great care should be taken to protect the streets from unnecessary damage. Any damage to the streets will require a full width patch from curb to curb and sawcut to sawcut. Sanitary and Water Utilities 5. SAC and WAC fees will be required for the new lot to connect to city utilities. Storm Water Utility 6. No increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private properties. Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 7. A grading, erosion and sediment control plan will be required for each individual lot when a building permit is submitted. Other Agency Coordination 8. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit will be required for each new lot. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard . Edina, Minnesota 55439 mvwEdinaMN.gov. 952 - 826 -0371 • Fax 952 - 826 -0392 A31 U ;C,19 T. 028 8.24 ?7 S (5) r (6) 5 3 1(32) $ x>s x S I (33) S tma R (106) R ,ma (97) R R '(104) R A R R (103) R + x R (102) R 1(99) ,ma .9 u R , +x EC.19 T. 028 R.24 W/I S /NE/ 9 V SE/ 9 N /19 S /SE /I arter /Section +(121) + (134) R n ts4 (120) (1sfi) i (117) x (163) 1, (119) 1 1✓ R (135) (11B) 12 R 60TH ST b f -�q 9 Y (s5I 4 (161) (134) R n ts4 Imi (143) (1sfi) (163) 1, nss+ RR (142) 1✓ R (135) e (159) (161) R (140) +(137) R R (139) R (136) R b f -�q 9 Y (s5I 4 Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. A3aPageNumber N O ti CU a ti (165) (156) n ts4 (1sfi) (163) 1, 11162) 1✓ R (1$g) (159) (161) 1(180) R Prepared by the City of Edina, MN. Original base data supplied by Hennepin Co., MN. A3aPageNumber N O ti CU a ti Jackie Hoogenakker Worn: Katie Ahlers <katie.ahlers @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 9:48 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 5825 Ashcroft I am a neighbor near 5825 Ashcroft and I feel strongly the the lot should not be divided into 2 lots. We have seen several over sized houses squeezed onto a small lot and they are not selling. I think it would be in the best interest of the neighborhood to attract quality construction with one big lot and one home that actually fits the lot. I believe this would ultimately help to drive value in the neighborhood. Sent from my iPad U To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: May 6, 2015 Subject: Public Hearing — Living Streets Plan Action Requested: Approve the Living Streets Plan A, n?l� �•'���nRPOPAKF'O IBAA Agenda Item #: VI. D. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: Please recall that the City Council passed the Living Streets Policy August, 2013. That Policy calls for the • development of a Living Streets Plan to guide the implementation of the Policy. From September of 2013 until early 2015, monthly meetings were held with the Living Streets Advisory Group (LSAG), made up of members of Edina's boards and commissions, and an internal team comprised of Edina staff members from various departments. In February 2015, staff held two public meetings to share the draft Living Streets Plan and to obtain input. Approximately 50 members of the community attended and while there were concerns expressed regarding sidewalks, the loss of on- street parking, and larger traffic issues, overall opinions were positive. With feedback from the internal team, LSAG, Transportation Commission (Mar. 19), Planning Commission (Mar. 25), and the public, staff has prepared the attached Living Streets Plan for City Council review and approval. This Living Streets Plan has also been posted to the City's Speak Up, Edina! website for public review and comment. Please note that Chapter 2 of the draft Plan is the Living Streets Policy. Over the course of drafting and obtaining feedback on implementation, staff has found it necessary to revise the format of the policy (e.g. to include more clearly- stated Living Streets principles) and to include additional content regarding implementation and context, etc. When the final Living Streets Plan is approved by Council, Chapter 2 will replace (essentially serving as an update to) the policy approved in 2013. It is anticipated that the Living Streets Plan may be included by reference, or some components of it may appear, in the next update of the Comprehensive Plan. While a public hearing is not required for Council approval of this Plan, staff felt that it was important to provide an additional opportunity for public comment regarding implementation of Living Streets. Staff City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 requests that councilmembers review the Living Streets Plan that they received at their April 21 meeting and 41 to bring their copy of the Plan to the public hearing. Attachment: • • G: \PW\CENTRAL SVCS \ENG DIV\PROJECTS \IMPR NOS \BA391 Living Streets \Living Streets Plan \Item No. VI. x. Approve Living Streets Plan.docx From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: May 6, 2015 Subject: 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report Action Requested: None �9�r1A, O e Cn Con v � VIII. A. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information ❑x Information / Background: For City Council information, attached is a report that engineering staff prepared for the City Manager that • summarizes how the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2014. It is intended that a similar report will be prepared each spring to summarize the previous year's PACS Fund utilization. A brief presentation will be made to Council. This report was also presented to the Transportation Commission at its April 16 meeting. Attachments: Memorandum: 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report G: \PW \CENTRAL SVCS \TRANSPORTATION DIV \Non- Motorized Transportation \PACS Fund \2014 PACS Fund Report Memo \Item VIII.A. 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report.docx City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. - Edina, MN 55424 OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 NA, 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com 0 Date: March 18, 2015 �w a eHH To: Scott Neal, City Manager Chad Millner, Director of Engineering From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Re: Summary Report: 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report This memorandum briefly summarizes how the PACS Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2014. Its primary intent is to indicate what share non - motorized transportation infrastructure construction projects have of the Fund's expenditures for last year, in addition to general information for 2014. As shown below (and in the attached table), the PACS Funds available in 2014 was $1,644,267. This includes a rollover of over $502,867 of unused PACS Funds from 2013. Note that over $750,000 is estimated to roll over from 2014 into the 2015 PACS Fund. This rollover amount is projected to decrease in future years as efficiencies increase with planning and management of the PACS Fund. Additionally, with the revised Sidewalk Facilities Map amended to the Comprehensive Plan in December, staff has more guidance on recommending sidewalk projects in future years. $812,584 of available funds was spent on PACS - related projects (not including the transportation planner labor costs). Of that, over 93% ($758,824) was spent on construction projects, with 68% spent on sidewalks alone. Of the sidewalk projects expenditures, 44% went to sidewalks associated with the 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Projects while the remaining 56% went to "stand alone" sidewalk projects. Overall, approximately 1.6 miles of sidewalk was installed in 2014 using the PACS Fund. PACS Project Type Sidewalks Bike Facilities Cost $553,708 $78,805 Total Percentage 68.1% 9.7% RRFB Crossings $22,517 2.8% 50th & France Ramps $100,000 12.3% Hawkes / Hawkes Streetlight $3,793 0.5% Total Construction: $758,824 93,4% Thermoplastic Supplies $43,232 5.3% Consulting /Other $10,528 1.3% Total Other. $53,760 6.6% Total 2014 PACS Expenditures (not including staff labor costs) $812,584 100.0% Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 OF MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952 - 826 -0371 IrIA, Fax 952 - 826 -0392 • www.CityofEdina.com o e t't ���OAroN�TYO Please note that while many of the costs indicated on the attached table are actual construction costs, some costs are estimated based on pending final payments and expected Hennepin County reimbursement. Also, as of the time of this memorandum the 2014 utility franchise fees for the fourth quarter have yet to be received; these have been estimated. Attachments: Table: 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Expenditures Map: 2014 PACS Fund Projects Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 2014 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Expenditures Available PACS Funds (2014 utility franchise fees + 2013 rollover) _ $ 1,644,267 95% of PACS Funds (use for 2014 budget) _ $ 1,562,053 Project Type Street /Item Location Map Key Approx. LF of Facility Notes Cost W 62nd St (south side) Beard PI to Zenith Ave S A 864 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements $ 34,830 W 42nd St (north side) Oakdale Ave to France Ave B 3,973 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements $ 188,628 Grimes Ave (east side) North of 42nd St 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Crocker Ave (east side) South of 42nd St 470 2014 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements $ 28,212 Sidewalk Valley View Rd (south side) Gleason Rd to Chapel Ln C 930 Active Routes to School recommendation $ 125,707 York Avenue (west side) W 66th St to Southdale Transit Center D 710 Hennepin County CIP (25% County cost participation) $ 58,774 Vernon Ave (west side) Doncaster Way to Ayrshire Blvd E 1,190 Hennepin County CIP (25% County cost participation) $ 92,796 Xerxes Ave (west side) 1/2 block north of W. 70th St F 215 In association with watermain project $ 18,538 Metro Blvd (2013) Industrial Blvd to W 74th St Final payment for 2013 project $ 6,223 W 70th Street Green Bike Lane Metro Blvd G 140 Thermoplastic pavement markings (replacement) $ 16,140 Bike Facility Olinger Blvd bike lane pavement markings, ped ramps Vernon Ave to Tracy Blvd H 5,200 Municipal State Aid mill and overlay $ 62,666 Streetlight Hawkes Terr & Hawkes Dr I Xcel Energy install /invoice $ 3,793 66th Street RRFB Crossings Southdale Rd & Cornelia Dr J Pedestial- mounted, pedestrian- activated flashers $ 19,598 Pedestrian W_ 51st St RRFB Crossing (retrofit existing) Halifax Ave K Pedestial- mounted, pedestrian- activated flashers $ 2,919 Safety 50th & France Parking Ramps: Pedestrian Improvents L High - visibility crosswalk, paint, curbs, bollards $ 100,000 Thermoplastic equipment Council- approved purchase of installation equipment $ 34,264 Thermoplastic materials Council- approved purchase (for crosswalks, etc) $ 8,968 Consultant TLC Bike Boulevard Evaluation Valley View Rd, Wooddale Ave, 54th St Required 2 -year evaluation report $ 3,025 fees Living Streets Branding Campaign Branding and outreach campaign $ 4,609 Other Living Streets Branding Campaign Printing, materials, outreach, etc for campaign $ 2,894 Subtotal $ 812,584 Transportation Planner Labor Costs $ 79,752 TOTAt 2014E $ 892,336 `Some costs above are estimated, pending final contractor payments and receipt of fourth- quarter utility franchise fees Remaining in 2014 budget: $ 669,718 Rollover to 2015: $ 751,931 10 i Calvin Sebml 1111����� � R >>I � 1►t11111 11. 62 62 � 1 -1 IU 1 A [SR'..' FO LVyVI lu LnIJLII II J I ULU— I UIUIC • `'' "''"' Sidewalk State -Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk Nine Mile Creek To School Sidewalk Regional Trail N City of Edina W S E 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update 2014 PACS Fund Projects Engineering Dept March 2015 Comclk Scbool rrrr��r� S 1 ��� f �♦ � 1 1 4 f DEWEY HILL RDA 1 1 �� �' � •�••••� V Public WOh. @� , 1 Puk Munkwn r ........... 1 C ,� 76TH ST P � f Nmc Mik Ccak � 1c.i��4.swscti/ •� 1 � f LLSTW 1 1 � 1 -1 IU 1 A [SR'..' FO LVyVI lu LnIJLII II J I ULU— I UIUIC • `'' "''"' Sidewalk State -Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk Nine Mile Creek To School Sidewalk Regional Trail N City of Edina W S E 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update 2014 PACS Fund Projects Engineering Dept March 2015 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: May 6, 2015 �+ y ;v Con 1 88 Agenda Item #: VIII. B. Subject: Resolution No. 2015 -46 Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. Information / Background: Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015 -46 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -46 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Parks & Recreation Department: Dorothy DePasquale $500.00 Edina Police Department: Edina Crime Prevention $7,392.00 Edina Crime Prevention $13,500.00 Dated: April 21, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Crabapple Tree, Rosland Park, Memorial Chase Johnson SWAT Helmets Motorcycle Emergency Equipment James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk • r 1 LJ A, ^ CORFOla*�ti lase To: Mayor and City Council — Agenda Item #: VIII-C. Revised From: Susan Faus Action Parks & Recreation Assistant Director Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution No. 2015- 47 Accepting Three Life Sized Bronzed Sculptures Restricted Donation & Agreement Action Requested: Adopt resolution and approve agreement. Information / Background: I A group of former Northwest Airlines employees, through charitable giving partner Edina Community Foundation, would like to donate three life sized bronze sculptures to the City of Edina. These sculptures would be installed along the lower walkway in the northeast part of Centennial Lakes Park. These sculptures would be created and installed by Edina artist Nick Legeros. All three pieces would have an aviation theme, to honor Northwest Airlines employees and former CEO Donald Nyrop, a longtime Edina resident. The sculpture project includes life sized bronze figures of a young girl and boy, holding model airplanes, as well as a family including a father, mother, boy and girl as they exit what appears to be an airplane door frame. The base has a slight relief of the flight patterns of former NWA routes on a map. The donation of this artwork is endorsed by Edina Public Art and the Park Board. The sculptures are all appropriate for the public park environment with minimal maintenance required. Included in the project is the plan to provide the park with periodic work crews, under the direction of Tom Shirley, General Manager of Centennial Lakes Park, to help in the maintenance and beautification of the area around the sculptures. The value of the three pieces is $135,000. This includes the sculptures and installation. The sculptures would be scheduled for installation summer of 2015. Staff fully support the location of the sculptures in the park and believe that this project will greatly enhance the overall appearance of the park. Attachments: Resolution No. 2015 -47 Restricted Donation Agreement Photos of Sculptures City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 0 • • RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -47 ACCEPTING DONATION AND APPROVING AGREEMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES SCULPTURE DONATION WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; and WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two- thirds majority of its members; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Centennial Lakes Park: Edina Community Foundation $135,000 ADOPTED this 6`h day of May, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA) Three Bronze Sculptures James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 21, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk r �' U • r` XNAI .0 CITY OF EDINA RESTRICTED DONATION AGREEMENT Agreement made this 6" day of May, 2015 by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ( "City "), whose address is 4801 W. 50`h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and The Edina Community Foundation, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation ( "Donor "), whose address is 4801 W. 50`h Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. NOW THEREFORE in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows: 1. APPROVAL. This Agreement is contingent upon the City Council adopting a resolution pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 465.03 accepting the donation subject to the terms of this Agreement. 2. DONATION. The Donor donates to the City three bronze sculptures. The sculptures are life -sized bronze figures of a young girl and boy, holding model airplanes, a family including a • father, mother, boy and girl as they exit what appears to be an airplane door frame. The base has a slight relief of the flight patterns of former NWA routes on a map. An illustration of the donation is attached as Exhibit "A." 3. LOCATION. The sculptures will be installed along the lower walkway in the northeast part of Centennial Lakes Park. 4. INSTALLATION. These sculptures will be created and installed by Edina artist Nick Legeros. 5. RECOGNITION. As specified by City of Edina Donations, Sponsorships and Advertising Policy adopted by City Council on November 18, 2014 for a donation valued at over $135,000. 6. NAMING. A plaque will be used to recognize the donation. 7. MAINTENANCE. The donation shall be maintained by the City of Edina. Maintenance includes regular inspection, cleaning and minor repairs. 8. DECOMMISSIONING. The donations may be decommissioned based on the following reasons at the City's discretion: a. The donated item has reached the end of its useful life. b. The donated item is damaged to a point where repair becomes financially burdensome to the City. • The City Council determines that the site is needed for another public use. 181341v1 • • 181341v1 CITY OF EDINA D James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager THE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Name: Title: 11 0 0 ? ƒ� \ � « VOW D • r� L 17- • is Economic Development Manager �• !`CY)RYOR -ABC`, 186tl Item #: VIII. D. Action Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Resolution 2015 -48 Supporting Affordably- Priced Housing at 3330 West 66th Street Action Requested: Approve Resolution 2015 -48 Information / Background: Beacon Interfaith Housing has requested general support as well as $550,000 in direct financial support from the City to provide gap financing for the proposed 66 West apartment project located at 3330 West 66th Street. When completed, this project will consist of 39 efficiency apartments targeted as affordably - priced housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless. A variety of funding sources are anticipated to support the $10.5 million construction cost of this project. Even with financial support from other agencies, however, a financial gap is anticipated. Incremental property taxes would satisfy 5% of the construction budget. The City Council was informed of the developer's request on January 28, 2015 and discussed the request at the April 7, 2015 Work Session. Staff was directed to explore the possibility of using incremental taxes from the Southdale 2 TIF District to meet the needs of the developer. Staff has engaged Ehlers Associates and Dorsey & Whitney to review the feasibility of using tax increment financing to help support this project. They have determined that tax increment financing is a viable means to provide direct financial support to the 66 West project without overburdening pre- existing commitments. The incremental taxes will be generated by the surrounding Southdale 2 TIF District and be shared with the 66 West project based on special TIF legislation approved in 2014. Over the 8 -year life of the Southdale 2 TIF District, at least $12.7 million in incremental taxes is anticipated to be generated. This is in addition to the base taxes that continue to be paid and distributed to the City, School Districts and other taxing agencies. The incremental taxes will be sufficient to repay the $5 million TIF loan. Based on the special TIF legislation, up to 55% of the incremental taxes, theoretically $7 million would be available to support affordably - priced housing projects. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Item VIII. D. • Resolution 2015 -48 Page 2 The proposed Resolution will accompany the developer's application to Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) for tax credits to fund the majority of the project. The Resolution states the City's general support for the 66 West project and pledges $550,000 in tax increment financing to help fill the anticipated funding gap. The TIF contribution includes professional costs necessary to establish a new Housing TIF District and to prepare a Redevelopment Agreement. After construction financing from MHFA has been secured, the City will begin the process to create the new Housing District in accordance with TIF Law and prepare full legal agreements with the developer. In the event that primary construction funding fails to be secured by December 2016, the City's pledge to the developer will be rescinded so that an alternative project can be considered. The City has long maintained a goal of creating new housing units that are affordably - priced. Support of the 66 West project could achieve measurable progress toward this goal. A TIF contribution of $550,000 could achieve the following benefits: • $14,100 per unit for long -term affordably housing • $1 of TIF funding leverages $18 from other funding sources Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Resolution. THIS STAFF REPORT ALSO ACCOMPANIES HRA ITEM. V. (HRA RESOLUTION 2015 -01). Attachments: Resolution 2015 -48, January 28, 2015 staff memo, Minutes from April 7, 2015 Work Session, Approved 66 West site plans (5- pages) is P� • RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -48 SUPPORTING AFFORDABLY - PRICED HOUSING AT 3330 WEST 66T" STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: WHEREAS, the project being developed by the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (the "Developer ") consists of 39 efficiency apartment units targeted as affordably - priced housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the re- zoning of the property in October 2014 and modified the Comprehensive Plan to allow this type of use in the developers preferred location in November 2014 after concurrence by the Metropolitan Council; and • WHEREAS, the Developer acquired the property in October 2014 and is currently seeking funding from several sources to construct the project in 2016; and WHEREAS, a variety of grants or other public financial assistance will be required to build the Project including housing tax credits from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA "); and WHEREAS, the Project will be designed to encourage increased walkability in the Southdale district; and WHEREAS, the Project will be developed with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174 to 469.1794 (the "TIF Act "); and WHEREAS, the Project will be developed consistent with Resolution 2014 -139 and Ordinance 2014 -17 allowing affordable housing with supportive service in the Regional Medical District; and WHEREAS, the Project is estimated to cost approximately $10,505,000 and the Developer is requesting $550,000 in tax increment from the City; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer will negotiate and enter into a Redevelopment Agreement governing the Project and will satisfy all requirements of the TIF Act; and WHEREAS, the City will establish a new housing TIF district pursuant to the TIF Act and • 2014 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8 (the "Edina Legislation ") that will include the Property (the "Housing TIF District "). The tax increment within the Housing TIF District for the Project will be generated from the City of Edina, Southdale 2 tax increment district (the " Southdale 2 district ") in reliance on the Edina Legislation; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a tax increment financing district for the Project and the pledging of the tax increment to secure a loan for the project is a local contribution and will assist the Developer in securing the approvals from the MHFA for housing tax credits. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina endorses the Developer's application for housing tax credits as administered by MHFA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City shall provide, in accordance with the requirements of this Resolution, a total of $550,000 in order to facilitate the financing of the Project. If MHFA funding is not approved by December 1, 2016, the City may rescind its financing commitment to the Project in order to fund another affordable housing project. Dated: May 6, 2015 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of the City this day of 2015. City Clerk • P� •Economic Development 'Phone 952 - 826 -0407 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 • www.EdinaMN.gov Date: January 28, 2015 To: Scott Neal, City Manager From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Re: 66 West Apartments — Funding Request from Beacon Interfaith Housing MEMO ow9ea. l�t� �r s `Nt y Representatives from Beacon Interfaith Housing recently met with City staff to request support for the 66 West Apartments. This project consists of 39 efficiency apartment units targeted as affordably- priced housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless. City Council approved the re- zoning of the property in October 2014 and modified the Comprehensive Plan to allow this type of use in the developers preferred location in November 2014 after concurrence by the Metropolitan Council. The developer acquired the property in October 2014 and is currently seeking funding from several sources to construct the project in 2016. • The developer requested consideration on two levels. Direction from City Council is necessary for staff to proceed. • 1) Provide Letters of Support for Grant Requests to Other Agencies The majority of the funds are anticipated to come from state and federal resources. A successful grant application usually requires written support from the local municipality. Municipalities commonly serve as the grantees on behalf of the developer for grant awards from Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council. The City of Edina has frequently issued support letters and serves as a grantee when requested. 2) Provide Direct Financial Assistance The developer requests direct financial assistance from the City to further demonstrate its support for the project and to make progress on the City's goal of creating additional affordably- priced housing in Edina. The preliminary budget prepared by the developer anticipates funding from the City of Edina in the range of $100,000 to $500,000. The developer prefers that such support be confirmed prior to June 2015, to coincide with their application for the majority of the funding from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 • To date, financial support of this project has not been included in the City budget. City staff identified a few funding sources to potentially draw from, if so directed. Revenue Annual Background Source Amount These funds are typically split among various agencies that serve Edina residents. Approximately 85% supports West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) and Hennepin County Housing Rehabilitation Program (HCHRP) while 15% supports local public service agencies. CDBG, Approximately ' WHAHLT underwrites the land value for affordably- priced single - direct $ 120,000 family homes; they have completed 9 homes in Edina since 2007 allocation • HCHRP provides forgivable loans to income - restricted households to make needed improvements to their homes; they fund 2 -3 projects per year in Edina • Public service agencies include: Senior Community Services, Community Action Partnership, & Homeline (tenant advocacy) The property is located within an established TIF District that was granted flexibility to fund affordably - priced developments initiated prior to June 2017. Southdale 2 Unknown Over the 8 -year life of the Southdale 2 TIF District, it is likely that some TIF excess increment will be collected. The specific amount of revenue is uncertain at this time. A reasonably accurate estimate is anticipated in April /May 2015. This TIF District closed in December 2014 and is no longer collecting new Centennial revenue. The Edina CIP contains a spending plan to use remaining funds to Lakes TIF support public improvements that spur additional economic return to the community. No additional funds are available. Waiver of Historically, the building permit fees for private development projects have Permit Fees not been waived. Waiver of SAC/WAC -- Historically, these Met. Council assessed fees are passed along to the private Fees development rather than being absorbed by the City. General Historically, the General Fund has not been used to support private Fund development projects. It would be helpful for staff to learn whether the City Council is generally supportive of providing financial assistance to this development and, if so, what funding sources should be considered. 1 I • E WW- • CCLOREZ3 SITE Rt N LA200 • • �--6 LEVEL. I PLAN A101 �2 GENERAL NOTES: as V� Ao- 43 - -- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -- -- - -- - zf71-1 �--6 LEVEL. I PLAN A101 �2 0 - 66 WLw 0 • 66 Wen Aim --ALL-- MOLD IN ELEVATIONS A302 • e 0 0 66w- 0 1 p A351 ., MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL is HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 7, 2015 5:06 P.M. Mayor Hovland reconvened the City Council in open session at 5:06 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte; Communication and Technology Services Director; Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Lindy Crawford, City Management Fellow; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Consultants Jay Lindgren, Dorsey & Whitney and Mark Ruff and Nick Anhut of Ehlers & Associates were also in attendance. 66 WEST APARTMENTS — CONSIDERATION OF PUBLIC FUNDING Ann Mavy, Jim Casserly and Matt Crellin, representatives of the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative the possibility of the City providing direct financial assistance for Beacon's proposed 66 West housing project. The Council, Beacon representatives, city consultants and staff discussed different funding scenarios, how the city would give assistance via its TIF Policy, the various funding partners of Beacon and timing of assistance. Council members generally expressed support and gave direction to staff to work with Beacon and the city's consulting team to develop financial assistance options. JOINT MEETING WITH THE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Energy & Environment Commissioners attending the meeting included: Bob Gubrud, John Howard, Keith Kostuch, Chair, Richard Manser, Lauren Satterlee, Melissa Seeley, Bill Sierks, Paul Thompson, Louann Waddick, and Sarah Zarin. Commissioner Sierks and Chair Kostuch made a presentation demonstrating the Commission's concern the City's lack of progress in achieving its environmental protection and energy efficiency goals. They asked the Council for a reaffirmation of its support of the EEC's mission. The Council agreed. Member Kevin Staunton agreed to personally champion the EEC's goals with staff and in the community on behalf of the Council. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 21, 2015 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor L, To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Date: May 6, 2015 Subject: Southdale France Avenue Area Work Group Update Action Requested: No action requested 'w9N A,1'� o e Jess ro � IBBB Agenda Item #: VIII.E. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information /Background: Members of the Southdale France Avenue Area Work Group will give a status update on their work to date toward creating a set of development principles for the Southdale France Avenue Area. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IX. A. From: Debra Mangen Action XX City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: May 6, 2015 Information ❑ Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin • From: Maggie Harris <maggieharris2020 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 4:31 PM To: Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Capital Campaign Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members; I have lived nearly my entire life in Edina, as child and now as a mother who raised two daughters in Edina. Our girls benefited so much from the assets and services available and we are all so happy to call this amazing community home. I was so proud and grateful to watch the Edina city council vote unanimously for the approval of the 66 West project to shelter homeless youth. Our city is so richly blessed and has so much to offer, it is actions like these that demonstrate our empathy and our progressive spirit. These characteristics of caring for others and being progressive are very important to millennials, the next generation that will want to live here. This type of initiative keeps Edina fresh! As I understand it, there will be a vote on May 5 that will hopefully result in a capital contribution to 66 West from the city of Edina. I am writing to let you know how much we would value your decision to vote YES to help 66 West with their capital funding campaign. My husband and I will be out of town that day, but have already submitted our ballots to vote in favor of the multimillion dollar school referendum. It would be a shame to vote yes to take care of ourselves and not to vote to help those less fortunate. We have a great opportunity to demonstrate what a caring community Edina is. Please vote YES !! Sincerely, • Maggie Harris • Heather Branigin From: Cathleen Godsall <cgodsall @live.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Support Capital Contribution to 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, and Swenson: In September 2014 the City Council voted final approval of the zoning and land use for the development of 66 West Apartments, an affordable housing project for young homeless adults developed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. It was an honor to participate in and witness the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings on the 66 West project. It is my understanding that on May 5, 2015 the City Council will consider making a $500,000 contribution to the 66 West Apartment project, from funds designated for creation of affordable housing, which need to be used by 2017. Having the City of Edina's fiscal support would significantly strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional funds needed for 66 West. 0 Over a year ago I began to believe that the people of Edina could make 66 West happen and I pledged to see this through until those 39 apartments were available. As a longtime Edina resident and member of St.Stephen's Episcopal Church at 50th and Wooddale, I am encouraged knowing there is tremendous support for 66 West in our community. I will be there on May 5 as you deliberate on how to wisely allocate the • affordable housing funds, and ask that 66 West be given your positive vote! Sincerely, Cathleen R. Godsall, LSW 5601 Johnson Drive Edina, MN 55436 • • 40 Heather Branigin From: Todd Porthan Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 7:11 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Edina Senior Fair Mayor - We look forward to having you open our Senior Fair tomorrow morning. The event will kick off at 9am but feel free to come before or stay after for breakfast and coffee. Todd Porthan Heather Branigin From: Coleton Whitaker < coleton@ americansforresponsiblesolutions .org> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 3:59 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Call re domestic violence work Hi Mayor Hovland, My name is Coleton Whitaker and I work at Americans for Responsible Solutions, the gun violence prevention organization founded by former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. One of the priority areas we are working on at the federal level is legislation that addresses the connection between domestic abuse and firearms and we are currently working to reach out to Congressman Erik Paulsen on a specific bill. I wanted to see if you or the appropriate individual of your office might be free for a phone call in the near future to learn more about our group and the legislation. While we are working very closely with domestic violence groups at the national level, we are also hoping to engage local individuals in this effort. Thank you so much for your consideration. Best wishes, Coleton Coleton Whitaker Advocacy Associate Americans for Responsible Solutions (903)241-2181 col eton(d)resaonsiblesolutions.or� • • 0 • 0 Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Edina City Council: MaryPatLitwin @comcast.net Wednesday, April 22, 2015 5:59 PM Edina Mail Grandview Property Please do keep considering a public -only option for the Grandview site. Having a new Community Center there would be very beneficial to the residents of Edina! It certainly seems that the majority of Edina residents wish to have this site kept as a public space, so please do not use it for private development. I also wish to keep it as a public space. Thank you. Mary Pat Litwin 5808 Bernard Place Edina, MN 55436 Heather Branigin From: Merlin1954 @aol.com Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:00 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: My experience with the Apr 22 Open House on Grandview To Council Members: attended this open house and found it to be a CLOSED house to residents, run by mystery men who failed to identify their connection with this project. This is the first city presentation on Grandview that I have attended, and I found that whoever was running it showed contempt and rudeness to me and my fellow voters ... er ... residents. At 5:30, the start time, an unidentified man addressed the seated assembly. He did not identify himself or his role in the proceedings. He said there was no structure for the meeting, and he would wait 10 minutes to start until the room had "critical mass," and then he would take questions from us. At 5:50, 20 minutes later, he came back and addressed us again. He said that we should all roam around the room and look at the posters. He also said that, after a quick summary by another man who also was not identified or introduced, questions from us would be answered. After the summary, the man asked for questions from voters.... er...residents. After a very few pointed questions about density, who would own what, and traffic concerns (for which he had no answers), the man abruptly announced that question time was over and we should go look at the posters until a second, unidentified group of residents arrived. He ignored the confused expressions and questions from the residents. Another mystery man in the back started applauding, as if to signal that our participation was ended. 9 And just like that, the community was dismissed. I still don't know who these people were. I looked around for Rod Serling to tell us we were in an episode of the Twilight Zone, but he wasn't there. I don't blame him. This contempt for community input shows how bogus this process is. The whole legitimacy of the Grandview issue is called into question and should be ended, to resume in future with some genuine democratic principles. When those in charge only offer "input" on options chosen by themselves, we're not dealing with democracy. We're dealing with something Stalin - esque, a discredited government model that is very disturbing to find here. I'm thinking that we need a city council who practices democracy, which I assume Edina wants. This lack of transparency and prohibition of open discussion of issues is not, in my opinion, good enough for communities in the United States of America. The contempt and rudeness shown to residents, who pay YOUR bills, is inexcusable. No one's buying this farce. End this process, correct the dictator tactics, and try again. Next time, include the community for real and respect us as the reasonable adults we are. Donna Callender Countryside • • April 21, 2015 The Honorable James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: XI � BRIDGINI Sis 1NAT10i AL I N T E P N A T I O N A l Cored gbMV . TNw bca?�• July 16 -18, 20151 Minneapolis, MN We are writing to cordially invite you to serve as an official member of the Honorary Host Committee for the 2015 Sister Cities International Annual Conference to be held in Minneapolis, MN from July 16 —18, 2015. Founded in 1956, Sister Cities International represents over 545 cities in the United States that enjoy 2,100 sister city /county relationships in 145 countries on 6 continents. These alliances have fostered numerous economic development, educational and environmental programs, arts and cultural activities as well as youth and sports exchanges over the years, in a spirit of international cooperation. This year, Sister Cities International celebrates its 59th National Conference focusing on the theme, "Bridging Generation for Peace." We expect to bring together approximately 600 elected and community leaders and over 125 high school students from more than 30 countries. Attendees will include national leaders, international diplomats, mayors, local elected officials, city managers, business executives and educators, as well as community leaders. As a member of the Honorary Host Committee, you will join other dignitaries in championing the citizen diplomat's role in promoting world peace. You will be formally recognized in all conference marketing, public announcements and program material. (Deadline for inclusion in our printed program guide is Monday, June 22, 2 015) Although participation is not required to be a member of the Honorary Host Committee, we do hope you will join us in July! For more information about Sister Cities International, the 2015 Annual Conference, the role of the Honorary Host Committee, or to confirm your interest in joining the Honorary Host Committee, please contact Meghan Schmidt at mschmidt @sistercities.org or 202 - 347 -8632. Your consideration of this invitation to serve in promoting world peace is much appreciated. Best Wishes, Mary D. Kane President and CEO is Sister Cities International 91515TH STREET, NW • 4TH FLOOR • WASHINGTON, DC 20005 • TEL: 202.347.8630 • FAX: 202.393.6524 • WWW.SISTER- CITIES.ORG Ambassador EMBASSY OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH 3510 International Drive, NW Washington, D.C. 20008 Phone: (202) 244 -2745 Fax: (202) 244 -2771 No: 19.81.0011.200.04.001.14 April 2, 2015 Honorable Mayor, It has been recently noted that initiatives are being taken to name streets, roads and important parts of cities and towns in the USA after Major General Ziaur Rahman who in 1977 had first unlawfully seized power in Bangladesh. The naming of the street in the land of justice and freedom -the United States -to commemorate and honor a ruthless military dictator is indeed shocking. It is against democracy and liberalism that both our two countries uphold so very dearly. Such honor, if shown to Ziaur Rahman, could be possibly because of inadequate and imprecise information about him. Therefore, the reason for this letter is to bring to your kind attention the dark notoriety of Ziaur Rahman. Ziaur Rahman toppled a democratic government that accompanied the gruesome murder of the founding father of Bangladesh, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and 18 members of his immediate family, including his 10 year old son, while they slept at home. A couple of months later in a military insurrection, Ziaur Rahman who was the Chief of Army Staff, usurped the powers of the state. He ruled the country for 7 years when the Constitution and human rights was suspended. In fact, after the tragic assassination of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the politics of killing, coup, conspiracy and the grabbing of power illegally began in the country. Ziaur Rahman masterminded such kind of politics. During Ziaur Rahman's misrule there were 19 coup attempts against him. All were crushed with hundreds of armed services personnel mercilessly killed. In one incident following the coup in October 1977, about 2,500 armed forces and civilians was executed. Thus, in a recent judgment, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court — the highest judicial body of the country decided that Ziaur Rahman's takeover was unconstitutional and unlawful, being in violation of the basic norms of democracy. It also decided that the constitutional amendments by a military decree to remain in power were illegitimate. Ziaur Rahman also encouraged insurgence of communalism that led to the surge of extremism. He brought the religious extremists to strengthen his own strong hold and to perpetuate his regime by using the military intelligence, and other state apparatus. He sowed the seeds of militancy for which Bangladesh had to pay dearly in later years. Various Islamic militant groups sprung up and established direct connection with the Al Qaida and other terrorist groups. Now Sheikh Hasina's government has declared eliminating militancy from the country as its number one priority. The government of Sheikh Hasina and the United States are today fighting together militancy and terrorism in Bangladesh. Therefore, the Bangladesh government is concerned when honor is shown to Ziaur Rahman as it amounts to endorsing extremism and terrorism, which are at present creating havoc all across the world and stands against a priority policy of the United States of America. I would, therefore, request that such unwarranted and unfair acts that honor persons responsible for brutality against their own people and for promoting ext and terrorism be avoided, along with plans to commemorate such cruel dictators as Ziaur Rahman in your reat cointry. a ) Yours ncerely, (Ambassador M. Ziauddin) The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 • April 20, 2014 Mayor James Hovland 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, Girl Scouts of Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valleys is proud to honor 69 girls with the Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest award that a Girl Scout can earn. Among them, Linnea Palmstrom Porter will be recognized during a Girl Scout ceremony on June 7th or June 14th. Please consider sending a certificate of recognition or a special congratulatory note to recognize this exceptional achievement. To receive the Girl Scout Gold Award, girls spend at least 80 hours planning and implementing projects that innovatively address a need in the community. The 69 girls we are honoring are from the Twin Cities metro area, southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin, and they collectively contributed more than 7,000 hours to improve the world around them. The Girl Scout Gold Award is known as "what you really want to be remembered for" in Girl Scouting. Each girl develops a project to match her area of interest and address a specific need • in her local or global community. To earn the award, eligible Girl Scouts in grades 10 -12 must fulfill leadership, career exploration and community service requirements. They must also put their plans into action. If you would like a detailed description of the girl's project, please email Suzannah Stulberg at Suzannah.stulberg @girlscoutsrv.org The leadership and organizational skills, and the sense of community pride and commitment that girls gain when they "go for the Gold" set the foundation for a lifetime of active citizenship. These Girl Scout Gold Award recipients today will be the women leaders of tomorrow. If you would like to send certificate of recognition or a special congratulatory note, please send it in care of: Girl Scouts of Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valleys, Attn.: Suzannah Stulberg, 400 Robert St South St.Paul, MN 55107 . (It is our Council policy that we not give out names and addresses of the recipients.) It would be helpful to have your letter of congratulations or certificate of recognition by Friday May 15th 2015. It will be placed in a packet that is presented to them at the ceremony of their choice. On behalf of our Girl Scout Gold Award recipients and the 45,000 Girl Scout members and 18,000 adult members, we thank you for your continued support of Girl Scouts. If you have any questions, please contact Suzannah Stulberg at Suzannah .stulberg @girlscoutsrv.org or call 800 - 845 -0787. Sincerely, 1 "' uzannah Stulberg Troop Support Specialist • Girl Scouts of Minnesota and Wisconsin River Valleys Heather Branigin From: Timothy Kuck <twkuck @rocketmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 4:21 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview Development Honorable City Council Members: I am writing to express my support for private development of the Grandview site. There is no compelling public need or use that justifies the City retaining ownership of this particular piece of property. This is especially the case given the purchase of a more significant replacement public works site. The people supporting public use of this property seem committed to unnecessary expansion of government services for their special interests, which will only put more financial constraints and obligations on the City and its taxpayers. My personal opinion is that the site should be used for construction of more multi -unit housing for younger and older people who want to come to or stay in Edina. Regards, Timothy W. Kuck 6316 Westwood Court Edina, Minnesota 55436 twkuckCa. rocketmai I. com 612- 309 -1632 0 • Heather Branigin • From: Anne Wagner < annew17107 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 7:15 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Climate Change in Edina To the Honorable James Hovland, I am Anne Wagner, a tenth grade student at Edina High School. This school year I am working on a project about Climate Change, and making others more aware about the effects of Climate Change; primarily caused by carbon emissions into the Earth's atmosphere. I am writing to you about this issue because it can lead to an unhealthy Earth, and I think that there are some changes that can be made in Edina to help solve this problem of Climate Change. An article on the City of Edina website regarding steps for Edina to "Go Green" and written by Ros,, Bintner describes action taken by Edina engineers to create a car that is "greener ", but it does not describe the pollution of the air and how they are planning to keep the air clean. "Owing to our regional weather patterns, air quality in Minnesota has historically been good. Increasingly, pollutants such as fine particles and ozone cause the Air Quality Index to suffer." (Ross Bintner, City of Edina Website). I think that while people of Edina may realize the air quality issue, nothing is being done to solve it. •Specific action I would want taken is for the Edina Government to consider making a law about pollution from factories (such as paper mills) and cars to be reduced and consider cleaner ways for our state to function. Thank you so much for your time and consideration of this issue. Sincerely, Anne Wagner • Heather Branigin From: theberingers @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:43 PM Subject: Re: Revised -- 66 West Apt- Edina City Council Letters writing request Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, and Swenson: On May 6, 2015 the City Council will consider making a $500,000 contribution to the 66 West Apartment project, from funds designated for creation of affordable housing, which need to be used by 2017. The City of Edina's fiscal support would significantly strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional funds needed for 66 West. I am a longtime Edina resident and member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church at 50th and Wooddale, and I know that there is tremendous support for 66 West in our community. I was so pleased when the City Council approved the land use and zoning for 66th West, because there is a dire need for affordable housing in our community and the population of youth with unstable housing continues to grow. I hope this project continues to have your support on May 6th and that you vote yes to approve the $500,000 in funds for 66th West. Catherine Beringer 1 • Heather Branigin • From: Leslie Stiles -Oasis for Youth < paperlesspost @paperlesspost.com> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:31 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Meet the new Oasis Executive Director! E �'[€ KNATTHRCARDI -- r� L OASIS FOR YOUTH RECEPTION Friday, May 15th from 5:30 PM to 7:00 PM 1 Leslie & Don Stiles' home 69oi Auto Club Road, Bloomington, MN View reap Add to Calendar: Google, Outlook, iCal, or Yahoo Access event on the go: Get the Pad and Phone app For the best Paperless Post experience, add pctpc rksspost(i?paper lesspost.corn to your address book to ensure you receive all cards and invitations in your inbox. Block this person from sending you Paperless Post mail. Click here to stop receiving emails from Paperless Post including invitations and cards. Learn more about ourpru-acq puliell. POST •i • Heather Branigin • From: Brandon Schenck <brandonsl7563 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 9:58 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: kari.discher @edinaschools.org Subject: Edina City Council Hello Mr. Mayor, My Passion Project subject is, "Why we need more engineering in schools." We have met before at the 10,000 lakes regional for robotics, I would really appreciate it if you would come and hear my presentation on May 28. Thank you, Brandon Schenck Sent from my iPad 0 • Heather Branigin From: Jennifer Janovy <jjanovy @outlook.com> • Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 10:39 AM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); Kevin Staunton; Bob Stewart; James Hovland; ann Swenson swenson Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview -- please include with council correspondence Attachments: Comparison Redevelopment Concepts for Former Public Works Site to Grandview Square.pdf; Comparison of Interior Sq. Ft.pdf; Grandview redevelopment concepts 2008 to April 22, 2015.pdf Dear Members of the Edina City Council: I attended the Grandview open house on Wednesday and reviewed the proposed redevelopment scenarios for the former public works site. The attached tables: 1) Compare redevelopment proposals for the site over time, from the original 2008 Opus proposal, to the Framework, CBG Community Center proposal, and the April 22 scenarios. As a rule, the scenarios have become taller and denser over time. The least dense scenario is the CBG Community Center proposal. 2) Estimates interior square footage devoted to public and private uses in the Framework, CBG Community Center proposal, and April 22 scenarios. The April 22 scenarios include an estimated 9 -22% public /civic space (78 -91% private). 3) Compare existing development at Grandview Square (Library /Senior Center, condos, offices, and park) to the April 22 scenarios. The Grandview Square area is about 4x larger than the former public works site. The April 22 scenarios propose nearly as much to more development on a site that is about 1/4 the size. • Any errors in the tables are unintentional - -if you notice errors, please let me know. Please also let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your thoughtful consideration, Jennifer Janovy • Comparison Redevelopment Concepts for Former Public Works Site to Grandview Square Grandview Square is approximately 4x larger than the former public works site, yet: • Scenario 1 has only 21 -31 fewer residential units than Grandview Square; Scenario 2 has up to 79 more residential units than Grandview Square; and Scenario 3 has approximately the same number of units (or a hotel) • Scenarios 2 and 3 have up to 24,000 additional sq. ft. of indoor "civic" space and up to 53,507 sq. ft. additional outdoor "civic" space (including the proposed shared street) • Scenarios 1 and 2 would be up to eight stories taller than Grandview Square buildings • Redevelopment scenarios for the former public works site include up to 130 additional parking spaces (based on estimated number of spaces at Grandview Square) The former public works site redevelopment scenarios propose nearly as much to more development on a site that is about % the size of Grandview Square. I Condos, office building, Library /Senior Center, park 2 All scenarios as shown at April 22, 2015 Open House 3 Hennepin County Property Information search, accessed 4/23/15 4 Winter 2001 AboutTown 5 1,500 sq. ft. per unit, for calculation purposes (hotel units not included in calculations) 6 Edina Library and Senior Center, Winter 2001 AboutTown ' Grandview Square Park, Hennepin County Property Information search, accessed 4/23/15 8 Library and Senior Center (91 estimated), Condos (2 per unit, 342 estimated), Office (185 per LoopNet property listing accessed 4/23/15) 9 Grandview Square Fact Sheet, Opus website, accessed 4/23/15 Grandview Square' Scenario 12 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Site Size Approximately 12.03 acres Approximately 3.3 acres Approximately 3.3 acres Approximately 3.3 acres Residential 171 units' 140 -150 units 230 -250 units OR 140 -150 units plus 150 unit hotel 170 units OR 150 unit hotel Estimated Residential Sq. Ft.5 256,500 sq. ft. 210,000 - 225,000 sq. ft. 345,000- 375,000 sq. ft. 255,000 sq_ ft. Indoor "Civic" 36,000 sq. ft.6 24,000 sq. ft. 50,000- 60,000 sq. ft. 50,000- 60,000 sq. ft. Outdoor "Civic" 26,493 sq. ft.' 80,000 sq. ft. (including new shared street) 60,000 sq. ft. (including new shared street) 75,000 sq. ft. (including new shared street) Parking 6188 654 748 643 Retail /Restaurant N/A 5,000 -8,000 sq. ft. 5,000 -8,000 sq. ft. 5,000 -8,000 sq. ft. Office 96,000 sq. ft.9 40,000 sq. ft. N/A N/A Max. Height 4 stories 10 -12 stories 10 -12 stories 5 stories Total Indoor Space (not including residential common areas, mechanicals, parking, etc.) 388,500 sq. ft. 279,000- 297,000 sq. ft. 400,000- 443,000 sq. ft. 310,000- 323,000 sq. ft. Grandview Square is approximately 4x larger than the former public works site, yet: • Scenario 1 has only 21 -31 fewer residential units than Grandview Square; Scenario 2 has up to 79 more residential units than Grandview Square; and Scenario 3 has approximately the same number of units (or a hotel) • Scenarios 2 and 3 have up to 24,000 additional sq. ft. of indoor "civic" space and up to 53,507 sq. ft. additional outdoor "civic" space (including the proposed shared street) • Scenarios 1 and 2 would be up to eight stories taller than Grandview Square buildings • Redevelopment scenarios for the former public works site include up to 130 additional parking spaces (based on estimated number of spaces at Grandview Square) The former public works site redevelopment scenarios propose nearly as much to more development on a site that is about % the size of Grandview Square. I Condos, office building, Library /Senior Center, park 2 All scenarios as shown at April 22, 2015 Open House 3 Hennepin County Property Information search, accessed 4/23/15 4 Winter 2001 AboutTown 5 1,500 sq. ft. per unit, for calculation purposes (hotel units not included in calculations) 6 Edina Library and Senior Center, Winter 2001 AboutTown ' Grandview Square Park, Hennepin County Property Information search, accessed 4/23/15 8 Library and Senior Center (91 estimated), Condos (2 per unit, 342 estimated), Office (185 per LoopNet property listing accessed 4/23/15) 9 Grandview Square Fact Sheet, Opus website, accessed 4/23/15 Comparison of Interior Sq. Ft. Community Center Proposal, Framework and Current Development Scenarios For purposes of calculating housing sq. ft., all housing units are estimated to be 1,500 sq. ft. This estimate does not include common areas, storage, or mechanicals. Square footage of hotel room scenarios not calculated. 2 Assumed, for calculation purposes. 3 Assumes restaurant /retail space would be publicly owned and leased or contracted to private entity. • �j Grandview Citizens For A April 22 ' April 22 April 22 Redevelopment Better Grandview 2015 _' 201S Scenario ° 201S Framework p. 19 Community Center Scenario 1 ' 2 Scenario 3 (2012) Proposal (2014) Interior "Civic" 50,000 sq. ft. 105,000 sq. ft. 24;000 sq. 50,000- 60,000 50,000- ft. sq. ft. 60,000 sq. ft. Office N/A N/A 40,000 sq. N/A N/A f. Residential 82 units 0 units 140 -150 ' ; 230 -250 units 170 units OR (123,000 sq. ft.)' units OR 140-150 150 unit (210,000- units PLUS 150 hotel 225,000 sq. unit hotel (3101000 ft.) (345,000- 323;000 sq. 375,000 sq. ft.) ft.) Restaurant /Retail N/A If compatible 5,000- 5,000 -8,000 5,000 -8,000 (up to 8,000 sq. 8,000 sq. sq. ft, sq. ft. ft . 2 ) ft. Total Estimated 173,000 sq. ft. 113,000 sq. ft. 279,000 - 400,000- 310,000 - Interior Square Feet 297,000 sq. 443,000 sq, ft. 323,000 sq. ft. ft. Total Civic or Public 50,000 sq. ft. 113,000 sq. ft. 24,000 sq. 50,000- 60,000 50,000 - ft. sq. ft. 60,000 sq. ft, Total Private 123,000 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 255,000- 340,000- 250,000 - 273,000 sq; 393,000 sq. ft. 273,000 sq, ` ft. - ft. Percent Civic /Public 40% 100% 9 %' 15% 20-22% civic /public civic /public civic /public I civic /public I civic /public Parking 558 350 -500 654 spaces 1 748 spaces 1 643 spaces For purposes of calculating housing sq. ft., all housing units are estimated to be 1,500 sq. ft. This estimate does not include common areas, storage, or mechanicals. Square footage of hotel room scenarios not calculated. 2 Assumed, for calculation purposes. 3 Assumes restaurant /retail space would be publicly owned and leased or contracted to private entity. • �j 0 0 Evolution of Grandview Redevelopment Scenarios (February 2008 to April 22, 2015) Citizens For A Better Grandview Community Center Proposal: • Preserves public land for public use • Is the least dense development scenario • Retains public control over program elements (which influence parking needs and traffic) • Retains the most public control over the factors that drive public costs • Includes possibility of compatible restaurant /retail Original Grandview Citizens For A March March 11, March Early Early Early April 22 April 22 April '22,. Opus Redevelopment Better 11, 2015 2015 11, April April April 2015 2015 2015 Medical Framework p. 19 Grandview "South "Central 2015 2015 2015 2015 Scenario Scenario Scenario Office (2012) Community Civic Civic "North Concept Concept Concept 1 2 3 Proposal Center Corner" Cascade" Civic 1 2 3 (2008) Proposal Tower" (2014) Indoor "Civic" N/A 50;000 sq. ft. 105,000 sq. 16,000 23,000 sq. 40,000 40,000- 40,000- 40,000- 24,000 50,000- 50,000 -' ft. sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. 60,000 60,000 60,000 sq. ft. ' 60,000 sq. 60,000 sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. Outdoor "Civic" N/A 28,000 sq. ft. Would be 21,000 48,000 sq. 37,000 ? ? ? 80,000 .60,000 sq. 75,000 included - sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. not including including including' specified street street street Total Indoor and N/A 78,000 sq. ft. ? 37,000 71,000 sq. 77,000 ? ? ? 104,Q00 110,00- 125,000 - Outdoor "Civic" sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft 120,000 135,000 sq. ft. - sq. ft, Office 114,764 N/A N/A 40,000 56,000 sq. 46,000 40,000- N/A 40,000- 40,000 N/A N/A sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. sq. ft. 60,000 60,000 sq. f. -r sq. ft. sq. ft. Residential 0 units 82 units 0 units 157 100 units 149 140 -150 290 140 -150 140- 150 . 230 -250 170 - units units units units units units OR units OR 140 -150 150 unit units PLUS hotel 150 unit hotel Restaurant /Retail N/A N/A If compatible 5,000 7,000 sq. 8,000 5,000- 5,000- 5,000- 5,000 - 5,000- sq. ft. ft. ft. sq. ft. 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 'sq. 81000 sq. 8,000 sq. sq. ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. ft, ft. Parking Four -level 558 350 -500 492 492 507 600 -800 600 -800 600 -800 654 748 643 parking spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces spaces- ramp Max. Height 4 stories Up to 6 stories Up to 4 6 stories 6 stories 10 plus 10 10 10 12 stories 12 stories 5 stories stories stories stories stories stories Citizens For A Better Grandview Community Center Proposal: • Preserves public land for public use • Is the least dense development scenario • Retains public control over program elements (which influence parking needs and traffic) • Retains the most public control over the factors that drive public costs • Includes possibility of compatible restaurant /retail Heather Branigin From: Sent: To: Subject: Mayor Hovland, JoAnn Knutson <joannknutson @hotmail.com> Monday, April 27, 2015 12:05 PM Edina Mail 66 West for Homeless Youth I think an investment of $500,000 in our area's homeless youth and affordable housing would be a wonderful thing! Please vote to help fund the matching money needed to secure state f unding of 66 West on May 6th. I will be there! JoAnn Knutson 0 J C 0 • Heather Branigin From: Dinesh Nathan < dineshnl7514 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 8:34 PM To: robert011 @msn.com; lames Hovland Cc: Elizabeth Barniskis Subject: Passion Fair Hello, my name is Dinesh Nathan we are presenting our passion projects which is a ten page paper on what we think is wrong with our world today at the passion fair at Edina High School tomorrow. Personally I will be presenting on the causes and prevention of obesity. The passion fair is at Edina High school on Wednesday the 28th in the commons and the median center, and I will be presenting my project in the last group. Thanks for reading and hope to see you there! Heather Branigin From: Edina < tylerrl7178 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 10:20 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Elizabeth .Barniskis @edinaschools.org Subject: Passion Project Fair Dear Mr. Hovland, My name is Tyler Ramirez and am a sophomore at Edina High School. I would like to invite you to my Passion Project Fair on April 28th. I did my topic on the possible effects of living in single - parent homes and for my action plan I am going on a mission trip to Indiana to help repair homes. My time is 11:45 -12:45 in the commons of EHS. Thank you Tyler Ramirez • • Heather Branigin From: Merlin1954 @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 4:39 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: Open House for Grandview Thank you, Ann. Do YOU know who they were? Are you concerned about how these folks did not introduce themselves to the voters .... er .... members of the community present and were unwilling to take questions? Is that the kind of treatment the City Council wants to hand out to the voters .... er .... members of the community? Donna In a message dated 4/28/2015 9:31:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time, Ibiunno (d,)EdinaMN.gov writes: Donna, I am sorry you felt that way. Ann Swenson, council Sent from my Wad • Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin ;. --A2400 Government Center Mpls, MN 55487 -0240 Vz •I Heather Branigin • From: Kate Thornton <kate- thornton @hotmail,com> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 9:48 PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: May 6 vote on funds for 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart and Swenson: I write in support of the proposed $500,000 contribution for 66 West. In September, you bravely approved the development of 66 West Apartments, an affordable housing project for young homeless adults proposed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. I understand that on May 6, 2015, the City Council will consider whether to make a $500,000 contribution to 66 West, from funds designated for the creation of affordable housing and funds which-need to be used by 2017. Having the City of Edina's financial support in place would strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional necessary funds for 66 West. I have had the privilege of working with Beacon over the past year as a mentor for a family coming out of a homeless situation. Beacon has impressed me time and time again with their organization, consistency and thoroughness. It is a top notch organization that I am honored to partner with. Their commitment to ending homelessness throughout the Twin Cities is unparalleled. Their work should be a model for similar needs throughout our nation. I am a member of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church located at the corner of 50th Street and Wooddale Ave. Our church is behind 66 West and is committed to seeing it through. More importantly, St. Stephens stands with several other Edina and west metro congregations in fighting to end youth homelessness with the building of 66 West. We would appreciate your votes to approve the $500,000 contribution to 66 West of funds that need to be used anyway and that are already designated for affordable housing. Beacon is the organization to wisely and efficiently use this money and 66 West is the place. All we need is your vote. Sincerely, Kate Thornton 4225 Wooddale Ave. S. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • Heather Branigin From: Jim Arneson <jimarneson @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29,201S 9:3S AM To: James Hovland Subject: Dan Patch Bridge Attachments: SWLRT Southerly Connector jpg; TC &W Sooutherly Connectorjpg Mayor Hovland, The latest issue (April 2015) of the Fedgazette (newsletter of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis) has an article entitled "The little railroads that could ". The article states that the TC &W railroad plans to repair a bridge over the Minnesota River this year to gain direct access to barge terminals. This is almost certainly the Dan Patch bridge over the river South of Bloomington. I find this especially interesting considering the fact that the most recent plans for the SWLRT include a "Southerly Connector" for the TC &W to the old MN &S tracks through Saint Louis Park, Edina, and Bloomington connecting to this bridge. The only reasonable conclusion is that the TC &W must be planning to send their grain car trains to the harvest States Grain Terminal on these tracks through your city. It is entirely possible that I am misinterpreting all this but it seems like something the residents of Edina might not be entirely pleased with. Jim Arneson • SOUTHWEST LRT ALIGNMENT wmi SEGMENT E2 - ST. LOUIS PARK Zk LOUISIANA STATION PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN kL SECTION AT PLATFORM SEPTEMBER 2014 16' Heather Branigin isFrom: tyouuel <tyouuel @yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 11:17 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Lot at Lynn and Littel Dear Mayor, I live across the street from the City Homes development of the Sidell property and was surprised this morning at what appears to be unreported and permanent land alteration of the public space. I do remember discussion of a water garden to handle runoff from a 100 year flood but the size and location of this appears to be different from what was shared with public. The outpouring from the neighbors from this and previous development attempts has clearly shown that the neighborhood desires to be part of all landscaping and other changes to this public space. Once again, this reality seems to have been ignored. Please advise if construction can be halted until this can be sorted out. Thank you, Ted Youel 4228 Oakdale 612.743.8928 • i again use it again April 20, 2015 Dear Mayor: A Clothes Collection System 10 We are pleased to present EDINA with a Certificate of Sustainability from USAgain. This certificate documents our shared success in greening your community. We commend you for hosting USAgain collection bins in your community, and the attached certificate is a great way to increase recycling awareness and document EDINA's efforts toward sustainability. In 2014, USAgain diverted 33,271 pounds of textile waste from landfills (equal to 7.6048 garbage truckload(s)), saved 190.12 cubic yards of landfill space, prevented 232,897 pounds of CO2 emissions, and saved 46,579,400 gallons of water. None of this would have been possible without the help of site sponsors and the cooperation of municipalities. With your help, we are one step closer to reducing the amount of clothes, shoes, and other textiles that are thrown away everyday in the United States. According to the EPA, 85% of all textiles in the U.S. are trashed. That's 11.1 million tons of textiles sent to our nation's landfills each year - a waste of resources and a major source of pollution. One t -shirt requires over 700 gallons of water and nearly 7 pounds of CO2 to manufacture. By diverting the clothing from landfills and putting it back in the reuse cycle, we help reduce greenhouse gas emissions, preserve natural resources, reduce usage of harmful chemicals, and provide affordable clothing options for millions of people. Our success is rooted in our strict adherence to strong business practices, which ensure the public is aware of who we are and what we do. Our collection bins are well maintained and serviced regularly by our driver service representatives who follow routine schedules with pre- determined routes. In addition, we offer 24 -hour toll -free access to a live phone operator. We work with communities across the country, on our own and in concert with the Secondary Materials & Recycled Textiles Association (SMART), to advocate for reasonable and equitable regulations that recognize the benefits of and create standards for the placement and operation of collection bins. Through these efforts, local municipalities are adopting ordinances based on the SMART model ordinance to help promote the increased diversion of usable textiles through collection bins. To view the model ordinance, please visit: www. smartasn .org/government/issues.efm. For more information on USAgain and textile recycling, please visit: www.usagain.com /municipality. Should you have any questions regarding USAgain or our programs and initiatives, please contact me. Regards, CJJGJ,-O-- Mattias Wallander CEO, USAgain „o 800.604.95331 www.usagain.com I info @usagain.com !s ese N"H PM1.9: A. • • • Textiles Oct 0 l L ai I Water 46,579,400 gallons saved JJGCJ--�-)- Mattias Wallander, CEO 2014 EDINA, MINNESOTA Space Landfill a cubic • • . -• CO2 Emissions Will or 232,897 pounds prevented aaaInn www.usagain.com ( info @usagaln.com Garbage Truckloads Ff 1644 rC • c -dvli 14-0 J)p hod t�} i•�ad5a.� -�na�� �n�� � �M°m , uc o /.A—,-A Cl L4 A -Vd �A ; W Q�� ark OS 5-0(14 a d1� . J))YLA Mai ssa�6�� ., �OhsS W Vy Ps _ +.§�'• . 2dln �E�...e...b #�a -i�e� •..�it..r;v,.ix,a k =.`.az'� "s s..t�f•@ Deb Mangen From: crabtreejr @aol.com Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 12:05 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject: Council correspondence - Council meeting May 5, 2015 - Zoning Amendments Dear Deb Please include this in the Council packet for the next meeting. Thank you for your help. John Crabtree Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of Council. Re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments - section 2, window wells Section 2 of the proposed ordinance amendments include the definitions of window well and the setback regulations would include all window wells. However there two additional areas which deserve your attention: 1. Side yard setbacks for window wells. The current ordinances require a 3' setback for an egress window well on one side of the house. On the other side, a window well could in theory be built to the lot line. I observed the teardown of, and construction of the new foundation for, the house at 5420 Oaklawn Avenue. Initially I was astonished that the contractor dug a hole 8' deep to within 2" (two inches) of the property line. Accordingly he put his construction fence on the neighbor's property, which was done without consultation with the owner. I hardly need point • out that that was trespass. On the south side of the house, the main foundation was set back T6" from the property line. There is a window well where the inner edge of the wall extends to 5' 6" from the property line. It was when they backfilled around the foundation that i understood why they had dug so close to the property line. They needed the width to get the Bobcat T110 around the side of the foundation. The City Construction Management Plan states: "The construction on this site will follow normal industry and City accepted construction methods for a project of this type." The narrowest Bobcat (T110), where the operator sits on the machine i, which is the standard practice, s 47" wide. It is then apparent that the City is approving plans for new houses which cannot be built by standard methods without encroachment onto adjacent property. Either it is the intention of the City that this is acceptable. or there should be at least a 6' clear side yard setback on one side of a house. Any shoring and the construction fence should all be on the property being developed. There is the unusual condition where the same developer owns two adjacent lots. 2. Front to back depth of window wells There is currently no restriction in the City Ordinances about the front to back depth of a window well. This has led to developers exploiting the system to their advantage. At 5509 Park Place, the front to back depth of the window well is 6'. At which point is the construction a regular window well, a lookout window, or an outdoor patio? The Minnesota State Building Code requires an egress window to have a minimum front to back depth of 3' One way to move forward would be to make this the maximum front the back depth. After that it could be made part of the lot coverage calculation. I will have pictures for the public hearing on Tuesday • Thank you, and sincerely John Crabtree 5408 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, MN55424 -1609 tel: 952 - 928 -8434 Heather Branigin From: Brian Shekleton <Brian.Shekleton @hennepin.us> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:01 PM To: ntyra- lukens @edenprairie.org; gmaxwell @hopkinsmn.com; jjacobsl956 @yahoo.com; James Hovland; tschneider @eminnetonka.com Cc: Grace Goodrich; gbarone @eminnetonka.com; mmornson @hopkinsmn.com; Getschow @edenprairie.org; Scott H. Neal; tharmening @stlouispark.org; peter .wagenius @minneapolismn.gov, Janis Callison; Peter McLaughlin; Allyson Lueneburg; Dauna L Sprowls; Dorothy Rucker, Debra R Brisk; Catherine M. Walker; adam.duininck @metc.state.mn.us; mark.fuhrmann @metrotransit.org Subject: SWLRT Mayors meeting with County Commissioners Attachments: SWLRT May 5 Mayors Meeting Invite.pdf Mayors and City Administrators along the Southwest LRT alignment, Hennepin County Commissioners Jan Callison and Peter McLaughlin reserved a room at Minnetonka City Hall next Tuesday morning from 10 -12 to discuss the appropriate local government response to the new projected cost for the SWLRT project. The Commissioners apologize for the short notice but given the investments by each city in this project, they hope that every Mayor or a designee and a staff person of their choosing are able to attend. Met Council Chair Duininck has confirmed that he will be in attendance. Brian Brian Shekleton Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin 612 - 348 -5204 1 brian.shekleton @hennepin.us A -2400 Government Center 300 S. 6th St Minneapolis, MN 55487 Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. • • Pt: "il.lt ii'L. 1l );t(1.t1� `i�pr1N Co`� (;1'?- s48- 7 ?S_i4 CON! 11 V'S 1t'} \I:.k {4t:a�.��. "t�l Fr1C ii 1'?- ;14c`3- 8il1l iYi [fie r'Iiai H riii : i':.L'',rn H1ii. ril:'iiioikrn, 1 `:g+� y•'" ( 7kiAi15: 1(. I�iliR ..11C'L.�VCHLI \L'tIEtiVLI'I`.t'1 B0AR.1) Of" 1- 11.;NNFPIN C:,OLTN'fl' CO.iv(NUSSIONER5 April 29, 2015 Dear Mayors: Monday the Metropolitan Council announced that the base cost for the Southwest Light Rail is now almost $2 billion. We are inviting you to a meeting of all the mayors along the corridor to discuss the appropriate response by those of us most affected by any changes, local government. We hope you or a designee and one staff person from your city can attend this important meeting. Metropolitan Council Chair Adam Duininck, is also invited to join this discussion. Each city was deeply involved in a rigorous civic discussion that resulted in the choice of the existing Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for transit mode and alignment, This Monday Governor Dayton clearly directed the Met Council to examine all alternatives to the Southwest LRT, including the costs of "providing no major public transit system" to this part of the region. We hope that we can provide Governor Dayton and the Met Council with a path that will preserve Southwest LRT. We think it is critically important that the meeting precede the Corridor Management Committee meeting scheduled for Wednesday so that we can compare notes and prepare for that important forum. To that end, please join us at a meeting: Tuesday, May 5 10AM -12PM Shady Oak Room Minnetonka City 1 -fall 14600 Minnetonka Blvd, Sincerely, t� Peter MCLaughlit , Chair Counties Transit Improvernent Board Hennepin County, Regional Rail Authority . a'.I Irn >.i i•i �: !. .. h1t'I aeon[..; . -fan C:allison, Chair Hennepin County Board Heather Branigin From: Tina <tlandeen @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:02 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Mary Brindle; kstauton @EdinaMN.gov; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 66 West funding It is not often that one is given an opportunity to really make a difference in the social structure of a community. You have been given that opportunity now by voting YES on May 6. You can make a positive difference in the lives of young people that you do not even know by continuing to support 66 West. And in so doing, you will change their lives forever. If you vote no on May 6, you will still be changing their lives but in a manner that is really not worthy of the great city of Edina. For every choice there is a consequence. Let your choice result in a consequence that will help our young people now and in the years to come. Thanks you. Tina Landeen 7250 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 tlandeen(a-)-aol.com P.S. I would love to call each and everyone of you and verbally thank you for past support and and encourage you to vote yes on May 6, but ... this email will have to do. Thanks again!!! T. Heather Branigin From: White Oaks <whiteoaksedina @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:35 PM To: Chad Millner; Laura Adler, Ross Bintner; Patrick Wrase; Kevin Staunton; James Hovland; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle Cc: Patty and Brooks O'Neil; Erin Newkirk; Erin Newkirk; Karin Wille and Mike Casserly; Cheryl Appeldorn and Tom Schnettler; Dr. Christie Rhodes Dekko and Jeff Dekko; Jenny McDowell and Dan Jennings; Cheryle and Dr. Ed Clausman; Lou DiLorenzo; Susan Graham Subject: Fwd: Rain And Water Dear Mayor, City Council Members and Staff, I am forwarding the email that I sent to our neighborhood organization after the February meeting regarding the 2016 White Oaks street project and storm water management. If you take the time to read it - -it is long - -you will see that the White Oaks Assoc. and the city are aligned in the direction of these efforts. Our neighborhood is facing serious issues associated with increased rainwater inundating our wetlands. As we go forward in anticipation of construction in 2016, I would like the opportunity to present the neighborhood's perspective on the issue in a thorough and intentional manner. I know that as citizens, my neighbors and I can speak at city council meetings and that we will and have been invited to community meetings. In these venues, our time to speak is limited and we are not the primary speakers. As we react to others and attempt to share our concerns and our history, our message is muddled. • We would like to have an opportunity to give a formal presentation on the neighborhood's perspective at one of the next meetings where the storm water and street projects will be discussed. Please let me know if this is possible and if so, the time and dates that might be available. I would request about 20 minutes if possible. Sincerely Heather Wallace President of White Oaks Improvement Association Home Phone: 952- 926 -0855 ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: White Oaks <whiteoaksedinakmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 2:50 PM Subject: Rain And Water This is a long email Back in February, several of us attended a city meeting to share the results of the wetland study. Here is a link to the city information. http: / /edinanin.gov /edinafiles /files /City Offices/Engineering/Construction Projects/Morningside A White Oa ks C /WhiteOaks 022515.pdf Here is my understanding. History When White Oaks was established, the plan was for the Townes Rd marsh to remain natural, though some portions of it were owned by individuals. In the 80's a developer was interested in building houses in the location. The White Oaks Association organized and raised money, negotiated with the developer and was able to buy the land and give it to the city to be maintained as a natural area. The legal paperwork with the city also includes mention of the area for water drainage. Several years ago, while researching the tree loss in the Townes Rd marsh, Cheryl Appledorn discovered that in the late 1990's, storm sewers along Sunnyside which had previously drained through the Arden Ave sewers to Minnihaha Creek were diverted to drain into the Townes Rd marsh. City engineers had devised this plan to alleviate flooding in homes on Arden Ave. Background. We asked the city to consider working with us to mitigate the impact of additional rainwater that has been diverted into the Townes Rd marsh for the last several years. The city responded with a study of all 3 of our wetlands -The Townes Rd marsh, the Meadow and the wetland between France Ave and South Townes between 49th and 48th. Two solutions were offered at the February Meeting i should add that the staff from both the city and Barr engineering seemed to be frustrated by the lack of options to deal with our excess water. Here are the options they presented. 1.Installation of pipes to carry water from the other two wetlands to the Townes Rd Marsh (the lowest area) and • then another pipe to pump from the Townes Rd marsh to Minnihaha Creek. At a cost of about $800,000, this solution would require permission from the Minnihaha watershed to pump the water and water could only be pumped when the creek could accommodate it. As an example, most of last summer we could not have pumped water. 2. Use of 'green infrastructure" to reduce the rain that goes through sewers and streets into all the wetlands. This involves many options, including: rain barrels to catch roof runoff, raingardens, cachement basins below streets to hold water, permeable paving surfaces, and more options. All these options are designed to catch the rain and allow it to slowly seep into the soil, rather than run off into the storm sewers. This has the added advantage of protecting and replenishing our water table instead of sending it down the creek into the Gulf. One caveat The city has designated a "level of service" to protect homes from what they call a 100 year flood- or a the worst flood that could be expected in 100 years. This is what let to the diversion of water to protect Arden Ave homes from flooding. The recent study included a review of the flooding possibilities related to our 3 wetlands. The good newsibad news is that in a 100 year event, no homes in our area would be impacted by the flooding. Good news, because we are not likely to be flooded. Bad news, because the city does not have to fix anything to reach the required level of service in our neighborhood. What to do? Contact city council members to encourage them to provide the necessary funding to incorporate green infrastructure into our upcoming street project. Begin to thinly of ways to reduce water run off on your own property, if you have landscaping projects coming up, keep this in mind. Consider a rain garden and consider rain barrels. I will be working on this too. Frustration: Despite the extensive wetland study conducted by Barr, they are not able to confirm that the redirection of water killed our trees. While I understand why - -they have no evidence of what trees were there, when they died, etc, The fact that there seems to be no way to hold the city accountable for the changes in the wetland is a continued source of frustration for many of us. Looking forward We ask for your support as we work with the city to mitigate the impact of rainwater. As our neighborhood and our city has more impervious surfaces -- bigger roofs, patios, driveways -- and our climate has more large rainfall events, we need to update our view of water management. It is no longer realistic to simply observe our downspouts carrying water off to streets and to storm sewers and ultimately to far away rivers and seas. If we want to continue to enjoy our natural wetlands, we need to think of protecting them by slowing down our rainwater runoff, allowing it to stay with us and replenish our water table. This is the idea behind green infrastructure. Just as many of us have lived through a change in attitude toward pollution, emissions, and even smoking, we are living through a time of increased knowledge and awareness that will impact our management of rain. Heather Wallace •President of White Oaks Improvement Association Home Phone: 952- 926 -0855 • Heather Branigin From: James Cross <james.crossmn @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:01 AM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Council Member Ann Swenson Subject: 66 West Support To: Mayor James Hovland Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Kevin Staunton Council Member Bob Stewart Council Member Ann Swenson Just a quick note to express my wholehearted support for Beacon Interfaith's 66 West project. This will provide a much - needed service in our community and deserves Edina's full support. On May 6, urge you to vote yes to the city's investment of $500,000 in capital funding for 66 West. Thank you for your service to the community. Jim Cross and family 5928 Abbott Ave S Edina, MN 55410 • • Deb Mangen From: James Grotz <Jim.Grotz @ Raymond James.com> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:20 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject: Zoning Ordinace Proposed Changes Attachments: DSCN1027JPG Dear Ms. Mangen, Please distribute this in the Council Mail Packets and place this in the City Correspondence / Public Record at EdinaMN.gov, thank you. Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of Council. Re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendments - section 2 Regarding the proposed 3 foot setback from the property line on one side of the house. Please look at the attached photo: the dimensions are 6 feet in depth(foundation wall to front) and 13 feet in width; is this a " Lookout Window ", an " Egress Window ", a " Window Well " or a " Window Patio "? We are now forced to look at 3 floors of windows on our side yard ! Should this amendment cover privacy rights of existing residents ? Existing residents privacy rights are now being exploited by builders. As you look at the attached photo; this could be easily modified to be a side yard patio given the size. The builder filed his plans to build this as an 8 foot poured concrete foundation wall, then changed his mind just before the concrete was poured. Please limit the foundation wall to front dimension for either " Lookout Windows Egress Windows ", " Window Wells " or " Window Patios ". Construction Hours Please correct the City Code so it agrees with the construction hours listed on the Construction Management Plan which is a contract signed by the builders. There is an inconsistency for the Saturday construction hours. Please change the code so that so both the City Code and the Construction Management Plan stop all construction at 6pm on Saturday. Residents are entitled to enjoy the short warm weather outdoor season without bobcats and power equipment interference. Thank you for your consideration on the above. Regards, Jim Grotz 5513 Park Place Edina MN 55424 Day # 952 - 925 -5150 • mom 1/I ° -1717? A 7 - 9 3 to • i i 1 � ') +'/ / i .. �g r Jf OWN d� way i 'Tilt_` f 't ti AV IV- • ;rTH MEW 0 R,• HE1iRr'.DIVERS,,, • EXCELLENCE 4/28/15 Mayor Hovland 4801 West 50th St. Edina MN 55424 4725 South View Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 Phone: 952- 848 -3700 Fax: 952 -848 -3701 www.edinaschools.org /southview Dear Mayor Hovland, We are four students from the South View Environmental Group at South View Middle School. Our group works to inform others about environmental problems, their solutions, and what we as citizens can do. We recently participated in a forum entitled Here Comes the Sun. Thank you for attending this event! We hope you learned something new about what we can do for our community. Earlier this year, we worked to install solar panels on our district schools. Unfortunately, we met a lot of resistance on this idea. We acknowledge that building construction is planned for ithe near future and it is therefore unwise to invest in the panels now. However, we also suggested preparing to get panels in the future. The community representatives that we spoke with were unwilling to consider that option as well, which we didn't understand. It would be beneficial for Edina to lead the way in implementing renewable energy programs. We acknowledge that climate change is happening and we believe that we can help solve this major problem. We hope that our town will consider investing in some programs to slow down and stop the warming of the planet. Community solar gardens are a great way to bond our people and cut down on the burning of fossil fuels. Programs encouraging correct recycling and composting will also help our community cut down on our carbon footprint. Let's help Edina become a leader in the energy of the future! Thank you for your leadership and support of our beiiefs. We hope that we will see some of these programs in Edina! Sincerely, Abby Mans, Jonah Calvo, Kaela Bloemendaal, Jacob Crain U To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: May 6, 2015 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. w91NA1r� �rnl y • PORp`��9 • 18as Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last packet was delivered to Council Members. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin isFrom: Sharon Aadalen <saadalen @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 1:23 PM To: Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Ann Swenson; Edina Mail; Robert Stewart Subject: 66 West Apartments Greetings, Members of the Edina City Council, Your support to date for this proposed project has meant everything to the project being able to move ahead. On Tuesday, May 5th, the Council will be considering a capital contribution to 66 West. A City of Edina investment of $500,000. will leverage the state funding needed to make 66 West a reality. Please lend your support to this important investment. I will be unable to attend the City Council Meeting May 5th (Edina Chorale Rehearsal 6- 9:30pm), and regret I will not be able to attend and attest in person to my support for the proposed supportive housing for southwest suburban youth and young adults (66 West) in the former TCF Bank Building on 66th street. As a long time member of Edina Community Lutheran Church, a mentor over many years to an LGTB young adult homeless youth since early teens, I am deeply committed to working to assure that 66 west becomes a reality - a stable, affordable, safe, secure and supportive environment - a home - for homeless / formerly homeless youth in the south west suburbs. When built, 66 West will be the first such housing in the western • suburbs serving 18 -21 years of age. Thank you for your thoughtful request of this important proposed investment. Sincerely, Sharon Aadalen Sharon Aadalen 7100 Metro Blvd #106 Edina, MN 55439 -2105 Tel: (Land Line) 952- 925 -1478 (Mobile) 612 - 965 -0259 E -mail: saadalenngmail.com • Heather Branigin From: julie zimmerman berg <juliezb @aol.com> Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 2:46 PM To: James Hovland Subject: A few questions from a neighbor in St. Louis Park Good afternoon Mayor Hovland- I am a St. Louis Park resident with kids in the St. Louis Park Public Schools and I am on a visioning team for 2020 strategic planning committee for the schools. My area of interest and research deals with improvements to the facilities in the schools. I am a huge fan of the forward thinking of Edina with its facilities and schools. Like in St. Louis Park, I know that Edina Public Schools and the City are two separate entities. I was trying to find out if the building of beautiful Edina Performing Arts Center at Edina High School was funded solely through school bonding or whether the city was a part of the financing. Edina is lucky to have so many auditoriums and spaces for its residents to gather! I have tried to find this on my own but have not found the right thing. Compliments to whoever keeps up your city website -- you have a lot of great information there! Thanks in advance for your time and attention to my email. I look forward to your reply. julie zimmerman berg j uliezb Cad aol. com 952.926.9311 Ol .7 r� Heather Branigin • From: Cindy Larson Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 3:45 PM To: Heather Branigin Cc: Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Subject: FW: Trespass and difficulty • Good afternoon Heather, Per Mr. Sullivan's request below, can you please share this correspondence with our Council? Thank you, Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 952 - 833 -9521 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 CLarson@EdinaMN.Rov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Michael Sullivan [ mailto :michael @thenewoldhouseco.com] Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 3:16 PM To: Cindy Larson Subject: Trespass and difficulty Good morning Cindy, I know you deal with us contractors when we transgress. Is part of your role to address the Edina citizens when their behavior is harassing and involves trespass? Is my only option to call police and contact lawyers? The south neighbors at 5509 Park place are involving themselves with most of my subs. They stand over us and photograph us all day while we work. I have asked them not to talk to my subs. They stand on their 8' ladder to peer and photograph over the bushes into the backyard. They go on their roof to peer and photograph. We have witnessed them trespassing. They walk into the street in front of our house to photograph and address our subs. This happens everyday. It starts when we arrive. It continues past work stoppage, The city has gone a long way to guarantee its residents' rights, but my company is a property owner and taxpayer, and I think we are getting steamrolled. This has been a nightmare. Can you help? Please let me know. Please share this with the city council. Thank you. Sullivan Renovation Inc dba Sent from my iPhone The New Old House Co. Michael Sullivan 4536 Dupont Ave. S. President Minneapolis, MN, 55419 BC219097 612.282.8428 Heather Branigin From: Peter Otness <peterotn @gmail.com> • Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 7:33 PM I To: James Hovland j Cc: Laurie Shimizu Subject: Team 1816 City Council Appearance and Update on FIRST Championships Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina High Robotics Team 1816 is back from Championships. We would be honored to send team representatives to present to the City Council on the Championship competition and other 2015 team activities, as you earlier suggested. Just let us know the meeting date that would work for the City Council, and it will be our pleasure to send team representatives to present at that meeting. In the meantime, I am pleased to provide the following update on the team's experiences at Championships. The 2015 FIRST Championships were held in St. Louis this past week, April 22 -25, 2015. Over 600 FIRST • Robotics teams participated, so there was plenty of excitement and a terrific chance to meet fellow FIRST teams. The competition was truly international in scope, with teams from Australia, China, Turkey, Israel and, of course, Edina Minnesota (!) traveling to St. Louis to compete in Recycle Rush. Altogether over 18,000 students from 40 countries gathered in St. Louis, including FIRST Robotics (FRC) teams, FIRST Tech Challenge (FTC) teams, and FIRST Lego League and Jr. Lego League teams. The Green Machine competed on the Curie field, and at the end of the qualifying rounds we were thrilled to be chosen by the fifth- ranked team as their first alliance partner. Unfortunately our alliance was eliminated in quarterfinals, but it was an honor to compete at this level at Championships with so many fine teams in attendance. A highlight for our team at Championships was the recognition of our valued mentor, Mark Lawrence, with the national Woodie Flowers award. This award recognizes an outstanding engineer or teacher who best demonstrates teaching excellence in teaching science, math and creative design. Team 1816 is truly fortunate to have a team mentor of the caliber of Mr. Lawrence. Other team mentors and members presented and participated in conferences held in conjunction with Championships. Ms. Laurie Shimizu (with Mr. Lawrence) presented at a conference session held to brief teams Is on "How to Make FIRST a Lettered Sport in Your State." In another conference session, I shared my own experiences on last spring's Washington D.C. STEM advocacy trip to Capitol Hill. We learned a lot in St. Louis, and we had a lot of fun. As with all of our efforts and successes, it would not have been possible without the generous support of our sponsors and other supporters. Thank you for all that you do for our team. We will be working hard in the next several weeks to prepare for our next competition: the Minnesota State High School League state tournament, at the University of Minnesota on May 16, 2015. We hope you will be able to stop by Williams Arena to watch us compete! Until then, thanks again for your support this year. Sincerely, Peter Otness 0 Team 1816 The Green Machine Edina High School Heather Branigin From: Michelle Jones <mfrostl @me.com> • Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:08 PM To: Scott H. Neal Cc: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com; Tedd Nelson; Mimi Subject: Abandoned home that is a danger Good Evening Mr Neal, I live at 6227 Westridge Boulevard (Valley View Rd & Westridge). The house one removed (6300 Valley View Road) has been abandoned since at least when we bought our home in 2012. The home is completely unsafe, ugly and dangerously unkept. The outside walls have huge holes, with branches and "nesting materials ", broken windows, birds flying out chimney and all around in disrepair. It is very dangerous. If anyone thought it'd be fun to "party or play" in the home it may fall or collapse. There is wildlife living in the shed, garage and home. It is so scary. Also, this house has no address listed nor a mailbox. With all the homes that are for sale, families that currently living or purchasing to live in the neighborhood, it is an eyesore, dangerous and frankly ugly. Why is it this home is allow to be abandoned, unkept, unsafe and a great home for wildlife but there are strict rules for other people. I really wish this home would be used, fixed up and /or torn down (since no one can really live in it). If you need any ideas what to do with the one acre, make a pretty park for all the families that live around it (Westridge & Valley View). I normally do not write letters about other homes or complain, but NOONE lives there and it is close to collapsing and falling apart. Please check into the home & property. Also, please let me know any actions that are taken as my neighbors and I are concerned. Thank you for your time, Michelle Jones 6227 Westridge Boulevard Edina, MN 55436 (612)231 -2424 Happily Thank you, M Happily sent from my iPad • Heather Branigin • From: Dressen, Ric <Ric.Dressen @edinaschools.org> Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2015 5:45 AM To: juliezb @aol.com Cc: James Hovland Subject: Edina Performing Arts Center Julie, Thanks for your email to Mayor Hovland and your sharing about our performing arts centers. Edina Public Schools has 5 performing arts locations: ➢ A black box theatre at the high school ➢ Valley View Auditorium and Dragseth Auditorium at our middle schools ➢ Fick Auditorium and Edina Performing Arts Center at the high school. All the locations were funded through district funds and we work to have them available for our district programs, as well as our community programs. Let me know if I can be of additional help. Ric Dressen Superintendent 0 • Heather Branigin From: Lambert, Anna Mae <AnnaMaeLambert @edinarealty.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 7:42 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartments... Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, and Swenson: In September 2014 the City Council voted final approval of the zoning and land use for the development of 66 West Apartments, an affordable housing project for young homeless adults developed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. It is my understanding that on May 6, 2015 the City Council will consider making a $500,000 contribution to the 66 West Apartment project, from funds designated for creation of affordable housing, which need to be used by 2017. Having the City of Edina's fiscal support would significantly strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional funds needed for 66 West. Over a year ago I began to believe that the people of Edina could make 66 West happen and 1 pledged to see this through until those 39 apartments were available. As a longtime Edina resident and member of St.Stephen's Episcopal Church at 50th and Wooddale, I am encouraged knowing there is tremendous support for 66 West in our community. I ask that 66 West be given your positive vote! Anna Mae Lambert 0 • C • 10 Heather Branigin From: Gary Domann <brianandgary@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:08 AM To: Laura Adler; Scott H. Neal; Chad Millner; James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Melody Lake To: Laura Adler, This is a follow up to my e -mail I sent to you on April 22, 2014, inquiring about the start up date for the airators on Melody Lake. I would also like to voice our concern about the floating cables that connect the Airators. During our new sewer, curb & gutter, and street construction in 2012, the lake level was lowered to complete a new storm sewer on the NW end of the lake. The cable has been floating on the surface ever since then. (across from 5028 Normandale Court) When the Lake is frozen this really becomes a safety issue as the cable protrudes up through the ice. Many people use the lake during the Winter months. Lots of ice skaters, cross country skiers, and people with their dogs. Melody Lake is actually more of a frozen dog park in the winter months. Perhaps when the City treats our lake again this Summer, you could have them tie a couple of concrete blocks around the cable so it would sink to the bottom again. A response would be appreciated. Regards, Brian Ellingson Gary Domann Heather Branigin From: Bill and Lu VanBenthuysen <billandluvan @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 5:20 PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 66 West - YES Mayor Hovland and Council Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, and Swenson; Thank you. We have been so very pleased with your past encouragement and support for the proposed 66 West project under the Interfaith Housing collaborative, Beacon. Please know that you have our encouragement and support for approving the next step, the Edina capital funding investment of $500,000. We also continue to encourage support for this project by our Edina church, Good Samaritan UMC. Bill and Lu VanBenthuysen 7100 Metro Blvd #7100 Edina MN 55435 952 - 920 -9531 • 0 Heather Branigin From: Elizabeth M. Sorenson Brotten < Elizabeth .Brotten @lindjensen.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:00 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Follow -Up from Ambassador Aas Luncheon Mayor Hovland, Great to meet you today at the luncheon for Ambassador Aas. It was also great to hear about your connection to the Stanley, North Dakota area! I have very fond memories of the area and I wouldn't have chosen to grow up anywhere else. As I mentioned, my husband and I are new citizens of Edina. We love our new home and neighborhood and have been incredibly impressed with the responsiveness of the City officials to the various "new resident" questions we have had. The new citizen packet we received from the city was also very welcoming. Thank you very much for your work on behalf of the City and I hope our paths cross again in the future!! Meanwhile, I invite you to check out all the Grand Opening events coming up at Norway House this summer. We are very excited to be opening our beautiful new facility on Franklin Avenue in Minneapolis and have several events to celebrate the occasion: http: / /norwayhouse.org/ Sincerley, Elizabeth 0 LINfLi IENSLIV SIULLIVAS: f''EILIt.'s0N 4P A11 P IN t Y% .AI IA.6_ Visit our website at www.lindiensen.com Elizabeth M. Sorenson Brotten Attorney Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A. 1300 AT &T Tower 1901 Marquette Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55402 Direct: 612 - 746 -0104 Cell: 612 - 743 -0984 elizabeth.brotten @lindiensen.com THIS INFORMATION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THATANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY E -MAIL OR BY TELEPHONE AT(612) 333 -3637. THANK YOU. Heather Branigin From: Ward <wgodsall @live.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 9:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 66 West Apartment Project Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart and Swenson: Tomorrow the citizens of Edina are asked to vote on a tax referendum to enhance the budget of our school systems. We support these initiatives that help our young people succeed in their lives through an excellent education. On Wednesday, you have the opportunity to approve a $500, 000 contribution to support those youth in our communities who have not succeeded, as a donation to the 66 West Apartment project. This money will strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional funds for this project. As a community, we need to support all of our young people in their growth. Both of these projects will enhance the chances for success in their lives - for those in our school system and those who are perhaps living on the fringe, at greater risk, as homeless youth in our community. I encourage you to endorse this contribution to 66 West Apartment project for the sake of these young people. Sincerely. J. Ward Godsall, MD 5601 Johnson Drive Edina, MN 55436 • Heather Branigin IsFrom: ellyrw @aol.com Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 10:13 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Support for Capital Contribution to 66 West Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, and Swenson: I am writing regarding the development of 66 West Apartments, which was approved in September, 2014. 1 appreciate your support of this excellent project for young homeless adults developed by Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative. I have learned that on May 6, 2015, the City Council will consider making a $500,000 contribution to the 66 West Apartment project from funds designated for creation of affordable housing. Since this money needs to be used by 2017, this proposal is timely, and having the City of Edina's financial support would significantly strengthen Beacon's application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for additional funds needed for 66 West. I feel it is important to have more affordable housing in Edina, and I urge your vote to grant this funding to the 66 West project. As a resident of Edina since 1971, 1 have been concerned over the years at the lack of significant affordable housing in Edina and see this as a good opportunity to change the situation. I plan to attend the Council meeting on May 6 and look forward to your positive vote. Sincerely, Eleanor Wagner 5529 Vernon Ave. South Edina, MN 55436 952 - 922 -7703 • • Heather Branigin From: tom McCoy <tmccoy64 @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2015 6:58 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Hwy 100 sa 17 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hello , we are at 5021 edinbrook lane... please count our household as a yes..we see a lot of pros about this wall-thank you Tom McCoy • 0 • L' Heather Branigin From: Amber Mrnak <ambermrnak @me.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:21 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: 4800 Westbrook Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged As new residents of Edina, we were elated to learn of the possible installation of a noise wall. This would greatly improve the quality of our neighborhood. We are in full support. - Amber and Michael Mrnak Sent from my iPhone Heather Branigin From: Sanders, Laurie < Laurie _Sanders@ ca ble.comcast.com> on behalf of Coleman, Emmett < Emmett _Coleman @cable.comcast.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 12:24 PM To: Brian Grogan (brian.grogan @lawmoss.com) Cc: Scott H. Neal; James Hovland; rgetschow @edenprairie.org; rcase @edenprairie.org; platham @eminnetonka.com; SDevich @cityofrichfield.org; dgoettel @cityofrichfield.org; jgenellie @hopkinsmn.com; Ludden, Martin; Coleman, Emmett Subject: Letter to Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Attachments: Ltr to Southwest Suburbs 5- 4- 2015.pdf Attached is a letter from Emmett Coleman to the Commission for your consideration. • :7 X110, � COMCAST VIA ELECTRONIC AND U.S. MAIL May 4, 2015 Mr. Brian Grogan Franchise Administrator Southwest Suburban Cable Commission 150 South 5t' Street, Suite 1200 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: CenturyLink Video Franchise Application Dear Mr. Grogan: In late May and early April, members of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ("the Cities ") issued Notices of Intent to Franchise (herein the "Notices "). The Notices state that the Cities will hold public hearings over the course of the next two weeks regarding all applications that they receive. It is our understanding that these public hearings are to establish the record for the Cities' votes regarding whether they will commence franchise negotiation discussions, and under what terms, with the applicants based on the applicant's response to the Notices. I am writing to provide you with Comcast's position in regard to the process going forward and limited record in front of you today. At the outset, let me state clearly that Comcast welcomes a fair and robust competitive marketplace made up of responsible competitors, and we do not oppose the granting of an equitable cable franchise to CenturyLink. Consumers can choose from numerous video options today, including Comcast, DirectTV, DISH Network, and "over the top " - services like Netflix, Amazon, Apple TV and Hulu. This fiercely competitive landscape is challenging, but it brings out the best in each company — at least when competitors face a level playing field that treats similar providers in a similar manner. I. Comcast's Interest in This Proceeding. Comcast has inade substantial financial investments in its cable system over the years to serve the Cities with a state -of -the -art network. In order to provide cable services and locate its cable system within public rights -of -way, Comcast has operated under a cable franchise renewed by the Cities in August of 2012. The Franchise Agreement has required much of Comcast, including notably: • A requirement that Comcast offer cable service to customers throughout the member cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, specifically to every residential dwelling unit within 125 feet of Comcast's feeder cable (Comcast Franchise Section 6.6 • Mr.�Brian Grogan May 4, 2015 Page 2 of 3 (c)) and to any new development with a density equivalent to seven (7) homes per one- quarter (1/4) mile for aerial construction and nine (9) homes per one- quarter(1 /4) mile for underground construction (Comeast Franchise Section 6.6 (a); A one -time, $200,000 PEG grant (Comeast Franchise 7.16 (a)); and Courtesy cable services to over 100 schools, municipal buildings and government offices in the member cities (Comcast Franchise Section 5.2). CenturyLink's franchise application either rejects or is silent regarding whether and to what extent it will agree to many of the franchise obligations that have been required of Comcast. II. Level Playing Field Requirements and the FCC's 621 Order. Minnesota's extensive cable franchising statutory scheme is clear that: "No municipality shall grant an additional franchise for cable service for an area included in an existing franchise on terms and conditions more favorable or less burdensome than those in the existing franchise pertaining to: (1) the area served; (2) public, educational, or governmental access requirements; or (3) franchise fees." Minn. Stat. § 238.08, subd. 1(b). Since "applicant is still finalizing its initial footprint for the deployment of cable services "in the member cities of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, the applicant did not provide any information regarding the area it is proposing to serve. Comcast, therefore cannot comment on if CenturyLink's franchise proposal is "more favorable or less burdensome" than Comeast's franchise obligations. It is concerning, however, that it does not appear that CenturyLink's buildout commitment will be consistent with the Minnesota Cable Act. Even more concerning is that CenturyLink hasn't accepted even the minimal obligations that it has made in its own applications. For example, in the application submitted to the City of Minneapolis, CenturyLink proposed an initial 30% buildout; in the actual franchise, however, CenturyLink committed to building only 15% of the City. We want to be very clear that the FCC's 621 Orders that CenturyLink relies upon in its response does not preempt Minnesota's Cable Act. As recently as January 2015 the FCC explained again: We clarify that those rulings were intended to apply only to the local franchising process, and not to franchising laws or decisions at the state level.' It is inaccurate to say that the City must choose between following state law and policy or following federal law and policy — the two coexist. The FCC expressly allows build out requirements in franchise agreements so long as they are "reasonable." What constitutes 'Implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1989 as amended by the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Order on Reconsideration, at para.7 (rel. Jan 21, 2015). • • Mr. Brian Grogan May 4, 2015 Page 3 of 3 "reasonable" is left to the franchising authority to determine. While we have not yet seen an actual draft CenturyLink franchise, we expect it to contain a reasonable full- service requirement — consistent with Minnesota law and the FCC's 621 Order — so that, eventually, all neighborhoods in St. Paul would have the same availability of service and access to cable competition, and so that all providers bear similar obligations. Imposing reasonable, binding, and enforceable requirements to serve the entirety of St. Paulwill protect competitive and consumer equity and prevent selective service deployment. It will equalize the investment that all providers will be required to make in return for access to the public rights of way. It will ensure that competition develops according to which provider can best serve subscribers and not according to which provider enjoys the most advantageous regulatory requirements. IV. Conclusion. Again, Comcast does not oppose CenturyLink's entry into the local market. We are concerned that competing providers who make use of the same rights -of -way as Comcast, and who are subject to the same federal law, the same state law and the same local regulatory authority, should be held to the same reasonable level of due diligence and procedure, as well as member city -wide service requirement standards, similar to what Comcast has been held to. There are many factual and legal questions raised by CenturyLink's franchise application. Comcast has important interests at stake in this proceeding and requests that the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission establish a fair, orderly, and open process that allows for meaningful public review and input. Again, thank you for the opportunity to share our views with you on this important issue. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, or if you need any additional information. Since r;13{, drnnnett . Cole, an Vice President Government Affairs Cc: Members of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission 0 Heather Branigin From: Sent: Subject: Attachments: City leaders of Hennepin County, Sheriff Stanek <Sheriff.Stanek @hennepin.us> Tuesday, May 05, 2015 2:43 PM Events for Law Enforcement Week Memorial Flier.pdf, Open House Flyer FINAL (2).pdf Please find the attached announcements for two upcoming events that we organize in recognition of National Law Enforcement Week (aka Police Week.) The information also appears below. I hope to see you at the Hennepin County Law Enforcement Memorial (May 12) and the Sheriff's Office Open House (May 15). In addition, please let your personnel know about these events via your employee newsletters. Both events are open to the public so you may certainly post the information in public areas and to your city websites. Sincerely, Rich Richard W. Stanek Hennepin County Sheriff 350 S. 5 "'. St., Room 6 Minneapolis, MN 55415 612.348.2347 Hennepin County Law Enforcement Memorial The Hennepin County Sheriffs Office and the Minneapolis Police Department will honor law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty during the annual Hennepin County Law Enforcement Memorial Ceremony. When: Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 2 pm Where: This takes place outside on 4th Street South. It will be held in front of Minneapolis City Hall and the U.S. Courthbuse (300 4th Street S., Minneapolis, MN). More: The public is encouraged to attend. The ceremony is held every year during National Police Week. The annual tradition honors all who have died in the line of duty throughout history; the record - keeping began in 1884. (In case of inclement weather, the ceremony will move inside City Hall.) Sheriff's Office Open House This free event is open to the public. Learn more about the Sheriffs Office and see our safety displays; vehicle demonstrations, K9s, Mounted Patrol, dive team, fingerprinting, drug prevention displays & more! When: Friday, May 15, 2015 at 10am -3pm Where: Sheriff's Office Enforcement Services (9401 83rd Ave N., Brooklyn Park, MN) More: Event is held rain or shine. 0 0 • • Public is WELCOME to attend! 7. Tuesday, May 12 2pm Ceremony takes place outside, in front of Minneapolis City Hall & U.S. Courthouse (300 4th Street S., Minneapolis, MN) *Inclement weather will move the event inside City Hall. THE CEREMONY HONORS FALLEN OFFICERS FROM THROUGHOUT HENNEPIN COUNTY OPEN HOUSE FROM( 2 0 15 Opm kL &�e PaUia ... Rm:n a& Yhinz! • K-9 Demonstrations • Drug Abuse Prevention Education • Extrication Using "Jaws of Life" Equipment • Fingerprinting Booth • 911 Safety Information • • Dive Team Demos Heather Branigin 181 From: mary forsmark <mjf4425 @msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 3:20 PM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle; kstauton @EdinaMN.gov; Robert Stewart; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: 66 west apartments Hello, Mayor Hovland, and Edina City Council Members- Thank you for your support for the 66 West Apartment project. I encourage you to vote yes! Thank you, Mary Forsmark, Edina Resident • • Heather Branigin From: Peter Otness <peterotn @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 5:10 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Team 1816 Invitation to State Robotics Tournament Dear Mayor Hovland, FIRSTRobotics Team 1816 The Green Machine from Edina High School cordially invites you to attend the Minnesota State High School League FIRSTRobotics State Tournament on Saturday, May 16, 2015 at Williams Arena at the University of Minnesota. The state's top 30 teams (out of 192) qualified for the event at FIRSTregional competitions during March and April. It would be an honor to have you join us on May 16 at the State Tournament, where we would be pleased to give you a tour of the competition fields and backstage pit area, and an opportunity to meet the Minnesota leadership of FIRST robotics, team mentors and robotics team members from throughout Minnesota. The agenda for the tournament is as follows: 8:45 am — 9:00 am — Opening Ceremonies 9:00 am — 1:00 pm — Preliminary Competition Matches 1:00 pm — 1:15 pm — Alliance Selection 1:15 pm — 2:OG pm — Lunch Break 2:00 pm — 3:00 pm — Semifinals and Final Matches We would be happy to welcome you throughout the day on May 16 at any time that works best for your schedule. Please contact me at peterotn @gmail.com for further information and assistance in arranging your visit. We look forward to welcoming you to the Minnesota State Robotics Tournament, and hope you will be able to join us for an exciting competition that is also a celebration of science, technology and innovation in Minnesota. Thank you. Sincerely, Peter Otness • Team 1816 • • Heather Branigin From: Todd Porthan Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 8:11 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Edina Senior Fair Attachments: 20150504141120416.pdf, Edina Senior Wellness Fair Results.docx Mayor- [ wanted to thank you for your involvement and a job well done at the Edina Senior Wellness Fair. We feel it was a great success and I am very grateful for such a tremendous team that made this event what it was. I have attached a summary of our survey and a letter we received. Thank you again! Todd Porthan, Fire Lieutenant 952- 826 -0330 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 tporthan(cDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Fire To read news about what matters most, read the Public Safety Blog. Edina Senior Wellness Fair Results • How informative were the presentations? 1 2 3 -2 4 -2 5 -29 How was the venue? 1 2 3 4 -2 5 -30 How was the lunch? 1 2 3 4 -3 5 -29 Would you come again next year? Yes — 29 No -4 Would you recommend this event to a friend? Yes - 33 No What topics would you have liked to have heard about? CPR instructions, brief comments on health directives, massage /pain relief info, Facebook, computers, various summer activities at Centennial Lakes Park, local community center locations, nutrition, how to get more sleep, 911 procedure, talk about how rescue can get into a secure multi -unit building, senior weight loss, volunteer opportunities, senior living How did you hear about the event? YMCA, Edina Senior Center, newsletter (city and senior center), Police Officer went to 7500 York to provide info, city email, About Town, Sara Michaels -7500 York Coop, Sun Current, Vernon Terrace circular., City website • • 7602 York Avenue south #7311 Edina, Minnesota 55435 May 2, 2105 Jeff Siems Fire Marshall Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55436 Dear Jeff, Thank you! Thank you for holding the Senior Wellness Morning at Edinbourgh Pavilion at Centennial Lakes this past April 23rd. I felt it was well worth my time and I am glad I signed up for it at the Senior Center. I have always been a realist in the fact when I pay my taxes 1 receive services. I will also say that the services your department provides goes way beyond what most of us know what you do and that is fight fires. This "big" seminar provided those of us who attended with an in depth understanding of what the fire department of Edina provides other than the fire truck going down the street to a fire. The seminar was well organized and it was kept on tract with periodic breaks. This was good for me because I no longer can sit for long periods. Your selection of exhibitors was excellent. Their willingness to provide information was perfect. In fact I am making a point to use the services of several of the exhibitors. A well organized event full of valuable information presented. I hope you have more of these seminars because I feel more people, especially seniors, need to be aware of the services the fire department provides. Lmight add having the police represented in this event was so Important. They also have a vital role to play in my well being and they do it well in conjunction will the fire department. I really appreciate being exposed to the "911" call center concept. I also appreciate knowing that you have access to Condos and townhouses in case of emergency. This is important to those of us who live alone by choice. Thank you again. A job well done! Sincerely Yo s, John D. Alt 612- 239 -8179 • Heather Branigin From: Betsy Hodges <minneapolisbetsy @gmail,com> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 6:12 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Info from Mayors Hodges and de Blasio Jim - here's what I have so far. Will send more when I get it. Would be great if you could come. Following up on the commitments made at the USCM Cities of Opportunity Task Force summit,and the successful Stand Up for Transportation Day of Action on April 9th, we urge you to join other mayors in Washington, D.C. on May 13th to directly urge Congress to pass a long -term transportation bill to increase investments and local control in transportation infrastructure. Efforts will center around convening with other mayors, lobby efforts, and press opportunity. Tues. 5/12 at 7PM: USCM hosted Dinner, All mayors + staff welcome, at St. Regis Hotel, Chandelier Room Weds 5/13 at 9AM: Infrastructure Week National Lobby Kick off and Press Event, at The Swamp Weds 5/13 at 1030AM: Lobby Meetings & Leadership Opportunities at IW (Discuss with staff) Weds 5/13 at 1 PM: Mayors Press Conference, All mayors, at Location TBD • • • 0 • ZZE Edina uzxsua[es� Become a Dementia Friend Help make Edina a Dementia - Friendly Community by becoming a Dementia Friend_ Dementia Friend: Someone who attends a free information session to learn a bit about what it's like to live with dementia and then turns that learning into action. Each Friend chooses what action they will take. In Edina, we are hoping some will turn that action to helping caregivers. These Dementia Friends sessions are being hosted by the ACT -Edina Community Team - one of 33 ACT on Alzheimer's communities. For more information on Dementia Friends and our ACT - Edina Community effort, please see: http: / /www.acfonalz.ora /dementia- friends and go to our webpage at: http: / /www.acfonalz.org /edina. No cost to attend! Funding provided through our ACT on Alzheimer's grant. We look forward to your participation! Ma y Wednesday, May 1st 11:30 am - 1:00 pm lunch included Our Lady of Grace Church 5071 Eden Ave Edina, MN 55436 June Monday, June 23 4:00 - 5:30 pm snacks provided Normandale Lutheran Church 6100 Normandale Rd Edina, MN 55436 Registration Information Call: 952 -848 -3952 July Saturday, July 18 9:00 - 10:30 am snacks provided Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square #101 Edina, MN 55436 Email: comedu @edinaschools.org Online: https : / /edina.thatscommunityed.com /search /dementia. In- Person: 5701 Normandale Road, Edina, MN 55424 (8:00 am - 4:30 pm) MINUTES EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDINA CITY HALL Tuesday, March 3rd, 2015 6:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Item IX. B. 1. II. ROLL CALL A. Present: Alison Pence, Melinda Bothun - Hurley, Kristen Conner, Matt Doscotch, Joel Stegner, Cathy Cozad, Britta Orr, Virginia Ogle, Magen Puerzer, Aditya Mittal, Staff Liaison Jeff Brown, Resident Laura Bryan. B. Absent: Michael Sackett C. Member introductions, including new member and resident in attendance. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA (Doscotch /Ogle) IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA (Stegner /Cozad, w /amendments to minutes) A. Approval of February Minutes V. COMMUNITY COMMENT A. During "Community Comment," the Community Health Committee will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Committee Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Committee might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. i. Edina resident Laura Bryan attending meeting as part of Public Health Nursing course requirement. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Grandview Discussion — Comm. Development Director Bill Neuendorf i. Presentation regarding process and timeline for decision regarding former Public Works site. Previous CHC advisory communication is in line with some of ideas being considered. Members may be involved in process as it moves forward. B. Medical Cannabis Moratorium /Regulation — CHC Involvement /Concerns i. Discussion of how CHC may be involved in City's process for examination of possible Medical Cannabis distribution facility located in the City. State • law is relatively restrictive regarding type of product available. No specific VII. CORRESPONDENCE VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Member Doscotch: Edina Highlands Wellness Committee has been formed, he will be participating. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Bloomington, Edina, Richfield Community Health Commissions combined meeting. B. 2014 Metro SHAPE Survey Progress Report. i. Survey is proceeding according to plan. Discussion of paying for Edina - specific surveying next round rather than being included in Southwest suburb category. C. Eliminating Health Disparities Initiative — Community Input Meetings. X. ADJOURNMENT (Doscotch /Ogle) • ask from the City Council at this time, but CHC will be able to give input during process. C. Vision Edina Discussion — Asst. City Manager Karen Kurt i. Presentation regarding Vision: Edina process and how CHC can participate. Meeting at City Hall on April 14th from 5 -7 p.m. CHC may also use minutes or Advisory Communication to give input to council. Council work session on April 21St, so any communication should be provided before that date. D. 2015 Chair /Vice Chair Elections i. Member Stegner moved to nominate Chair Pence and Vice -Chair Hurley to continue in their positions. Second by Member Conner, passed. E. Work Group Discussion /Updates i. Mental Health /Substance Abuse 1. Doscotch, Stegner, Orr, Puerzer, ii. Adult Physical Health 1. Conner, Cozad, Bothun - Hurley iii. Child /Adolescent Physical Health 1. Ogle, Sackett, Mittal, Pence F. 2015 Work Plan Discussion L Tabled until next meeting. G. Binge Drinking Focus /Discussion i. Tabled until next meeting. VII. CORRESPONDENCE VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Member Doscotch: Edina Highlands Wellness Committee has been formed, he will be participating. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Bloomington, Edina, Richfield Community Health Commissions combined meeting. B. 2014 Metro SHAPE Survey Progress Report. i. Survey is proceeding according to plan. Discussion of paying for Edina - specific surveying next round rather than being included in Southwest suburb category. C. Eliminating Health Disparities Initiative — Community Input Meetings. X. ADJOURNMENT (Doscotch /Ogle) • The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. • • Item IX. B. 1 • MINUTES EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA EDINA CITY HALL Tuesday, February 3rd, 2015 6:30 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER — 6:42. II. ROLL CALL A. Present: Alison Pence, Kristen Conner, Matt Doscotch, Joel Stegner, Cathy Cozad, Nadia Martyn, Mike Sackett, Staff Liaison Jeff Brown, Resident Michelle Michaelson. B. Absent: Aditya Mittal, Magen Puerzer, Virginia Ogle, Melinda Bothun - Hurley. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA A. Stegner /Doscotch. Passed. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of January minutes. i. Stegner /Doscotch. Passed • V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Community Health Committee will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Committee Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Committee might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. Michele Michaelson: Graduate student attending a policy making meeting affecting families. Brief description of what the Community Health Commission is; how it relates to the council, and examples of previous activity (e- cigs). VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Committee Discussion and Updates i. Member Stegner suggested changing 3 Committees to: a. Mental Health /Substance Abuse b. Adult Physical Health C. Child /Adolescent Physical Health Motion by Stegner, 2nd by Martyn, passed. Discussion about where • maternal /child health would fit, in child or adult, likely cross - committee discussions. Committee assignments will be determined after additional members are assigned to CHC in April. Discussion around changing committees to or supplementing with working groups, which would allow for involvement of other members of the public. Members will consider options and discuss with contacts outside of the CHC. Change to working group can be made at future meeting. Is Chemical Health Partners still meeting? How to get in touch with that group? Is the Chemical Health Coordinator position being filled? a. Action- Staff Liaison Brown to check on Chemical Health Coordinator position. b. Action- Member Doscotch to check with Chemical Health Partners to see if they still meet. B. 2015 Work Plan Discussion —Topic leader assignments. i. Will decide assignments after committees are assigned at upcoming meeting. C. Pedestrian Safety- Coordination with Transportation Commission i. Member Stegner described experience observing pedestrian having trouble getting across street in winter. Sent observation to Edina Transportation Commission, which would like to use it as part of a blog. ETC if CHC willing to 'co- sponsor' blog post, bringing to group for thoughts. CHC membership willing to participate and to be affiliated with article /blog post. D. Binge Drinking Focus /Discussion i. Resident Michele Michaelson question about how binge drinking got on work plan, Member Martyn described history of how topic came to forefront of CHC's agenda. ii. Member Stegner passed out handout, data pulled from multiple national sources. Staff Liaison Brown will send out to members so all have access. iii. Member Cozad shared NYC's attempt to address binge drinking in 2010, gave examples of posters, etc. May be able to take lessons from NYC model. VII. CORRESPONDENCE VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Member Cozad attended public meeting regarding Grandview development; thought the input mechanism was good; data will now be evaluated and processed through commissions, public, and council. Drawings may come out in • • summer. Wide range of opinions in meeting, no consensus. Discussion about community center options, comparison to other cities around MN. Parking seemed to be a factor in presentation of options. Discussion: Process will allow for CHC to be involved and influence decision. Member Doscotch read previous advisory communication from CHC to Council regarding Grandview redevelopment. Considering sending updated version to council, as there are two new councilmembers. Member Martyn referenced Maple Grove Community Center where rooms are versatile, can be used for many types of events. 'Health in all Policies' must be a component of decision making regarding Grandview. Options for going forward: send another Advisory communication, have Bill Neuendorf back to discuss, try to individually influence other stakeholders, all of the above. Staff Liaison will contact Bill Neuendorf to attend March meeting to discuss options for input. Suggestion by Member Doscotch to funnel thoughts to Chair Pence to assemble and refine before next meeting and presentation to Bill Neuendorf and Karen Kurt. One concern was lack of gender /racial diversity on groups chosen to lead Grandview project process. B. Member Doscotch- Examined state of Edina youth population relative to Immunization. June 2014 numbers; stated 99% of Edina students in compliance with immunization law, but Minnesota Department of Health data suggests 97% with a 2.5% 'conscientious objection' throughout district. Data hard to find by district prior to kindergarten. Discussion of risks vs. reward of vaccines. Doscotch looked at process for injuries caused by vaccines, which is managed by the federal government. Boosters may be needed for adults with vaccines thought to be life -long. CDC has specific information refuting study that claimed vaccines caused autism. Alternative /delayed vaccination schedules may be contributing. Member Martyn: Vaccinations are a Public Health issue; (herd immunity) vaccinate to protect each other. Thought to add immunization topic to adult and child committees for further discussion. Doscotch will send out communication regarding background information and data. Member Stegner will send vaccination guidelines for distribution, also recommends finding location in Edina for BPH to perform immunizations, maybe start with flu shots. Doscotch to consult with schools about potential demand. Stegner questioned if senior center offers flu shots. Consensus from the CHC of the public health benefits of vaccinating and that the potential risks of vaccination do not outweigh the benefits. C. Chair Pence -ACT on Alzheimers group presenting data next week. Will bring information to one of next CHC meetings. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Tuesday, March 17th Tri -City Meeting, Bloomington City Hall (Haeg Room). Meeting of Bloomington, Edina, Richfield Community Health Commissions (Bloomington and Richfield call them 'Advisory Board of Health) Food served at 40 5:30, meeting will begin at 6:00. CHC will still have regular meeting on March 3rd. Please check calendars to determine if you can attend second meeting, as Members need to RSVP for meals. B. May Meeting, change of date: election. i. Meeting changed to Monday, May 4t ". Meeting to be held in Council Chambers. C. Vision Edina: Assistant City Manager Karen Kurt will attend March 3rd meeting. D. Shared Services Learning Collaborative Conference Brief update regarding conference in Charlotte, N.C. wrapping up national cross - jurisdictional sharing projects. MN had multiple projects, was very interesting to see how far along B -E -R is in relation to other jurisdictions starting the shared services process. X. ADJOURNMENT A. Martyn /Doscotch passed. The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. I� 40 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM MARCH 19, 2015 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were members Bass, Boettge, Campbell, lyer, Janovy, La Force, Loeffelholz, Nelson, Olson, Rummel and Spanhake. ABSENT APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Spanhake and seconded by member Nelson to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING OF February 19, 2015 Motion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member lyer to approve the amended minutes of Feb. 19, 2015. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT — No comments but students were present, observing for their government class. Chair Bass welcomed new member Ralf Loeffelholz to the ETC. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS Vision Edina Update Assistant city manager Karen Kurt said she was seeking input from boards and commissions on the draft Vision Edina which is an update to Vision 20/20. She said the process that began in Aug. 2014 included hiring a consultant who conducted research and a think tank workshop to understand the driving forces of the future, development ideas and shared /seek input on these. Ms. Kurt said four plausible scenarios were identified as — 1) Reinventing Tradition; 2) Nodes and Modes; 3) Complete and Connected; and 4) Edina Today — Extended. From these scenarios, survey results showed the following key drivers: 1) Residential Development Mix —mixed opinions; 2) Transportation Options— skewed towards multi - modal; 3) Community Development — skewed towards strong neighborhoods; 4) Live and Work— no strong preference 5) Education — skewed towards futuristic 6) Population Mix — mixed reaction 7) Environmental Stewardship — more environmental practices Overall, assistant city manager Kurt said the data seem to indicate a preference towards Edina Today - Extended with an acknowledgment toward a need for change but they need to be careful because the community values what has made them successful. Assistant city manager Kurt said the Vision Strategic framework was drafted by the consultant and staff is seeking feedback on it. Complete data is on the City's website, including the detailed strategic focus for each of the surveyed area. Feedback is also being taken on Speak Up, Edina! The final report will go to City Council in May for approval. • Discussion Member Laforce asked about total number of household (approximately 22,000) and how the survey was done. Assistant city manager Kurt said the survey was posted online and approximately 600 households participated. Member La Force s the data is skewing towards change but wondered if it could be from activist residents and not necessarily reflective of t broader community. He said he would be more comfortable with a random selection similar to the process used for the Quality of Life survey. Assistant city manager Kurt said the survey included a good sampling of high school students and those 50 years and older. Member Janovy said she thought the outreach was good and sees the residents wanting stability, biking and walking. She said in the session she attended, there were residents that she had not met before. Member lyer asked if the bubble chart reflected feedback from both City leaders and regular residents, or if their opinions skewed differently. Assistant city manager Kurt said the think tank workshop included both City leaders and regular residents. Member lyer asked how Edina was different from other comparable communities and assistant city manager Kurt said this was the consultant's first time working in North America so they did not have any comparable communities. Member lyer said the data tend to skew to the middle and asked if they should eliminate those and focus on the areas like transportation that shows stronger preference. Assistant city manager Kurt said it would make leadership easier in the stronger areas but they need to be cautious on the others to balance opinions. Member lyer said the data shows they do not want to be cautious in some areas. Member Janovy said she recalled people complaining about the questions because the answers weren't either /or. Member Boettge said she attended a session and the environment felt comfortable and safe for her to provide input and this is important when seeking public input. She said it would be good to get younger residents involved. Chair Bass read a section of the report that said there was "...lesser appetite for transit forward strategy." and asked how they arrived at this conclusion when the data is skewed towards multi modal. Assistant city manager Kurt was not sure and will look into this. Member Nelson said this is an area that the ETC is working on. He asked if they could access the survey data to understand the reasons because if residents aren't in favor why are they pursuing it. Member Janovy said it coul because transit is regional and not controlled by the City. Chair Bass noted that the report shows eight drivers that are regionally connected and other communities are ahead of Edina in these areas because of transit development in and around them. Chair Bass also noted that under Transportation Options, the report talked about "...to advance policies and developments deemed to be in the larger public good." and one of the strategic actions is "Undertake community education and promotion,... " -- she said this is important to highlight to the City Council because it has been on the ETC's work plan for a couple years but they do not feel there is support for it. Member Spanhake said a lot of general terms are used in the report such as "diversity of transportation," "local access," etc. and asked what they meant. Member Loeffelholz added that "local transportation" needs to be identified and asked if they are referring to Edina or the metro area. Draft Living Streets Plan Planner Nolan said he is seeking feedback from the ETC, the Planning Commission, Living Streets Advisory Group and staff. He said the communications department will receive all the feedback and make the final edits to the plan. A public hearing, City Council review and approval are scheduled for May 5. Planner Nolan said feedback could be given now or sent to him via email. Feedback will also be taken via Speak Up, Edina! Planner Nolan was asked if the Comprehensive Plan was going to be updated because the Planning Commission was included in the review and he said no; he said the Planning Commission requested to see the final draft and staff is honoring their request. Member Olson said the Bike Plan referenced is 10 years old and asked if it was going to be updated and both planner Nolar� and member Janovy said it will be updated eventually. 6 1► Member Boettge said there is a desire to make people feel comfortable and safe and she has seen signs that make people look more realistic and human -like other than the stick figure signs. She asked if staff would consider these signs. Planner •Nolan said they follow the practices of the state for signage but he will look into it. Member La Force asked if Chap. 2 of the plan was also being reviewed and planner Nolan said yes. Regarding Principle 8, "...designed to reflect the existing neighborhood character...," Member La Force said it is interesting that this is a principle which he agrees with, but it is also used as roadblock. Member La Force asked what was the meaning of Principle 15, "The City will increase the resilience of municipal public works." Planner Nolan said to strive to make the infrastructure more sustainable, to last longer. Member Nelson asked about street classification — local streets vs local connector — and planner Nolan said more clarity is needed. Regarding posting streets as no parking, member Nelson asked what was the guideline and planner Nolan said signs will be posted every 200 -250 ft. Member Nelson said he was concerned with sign pollution and asked if a policy could be written that would eliminate the signs or if this would make enforcement difficult. Member Janovy asked why are they automatically eliminating parking and suggested a policy that would be silent but allow for changes as needed. She said the community strongly objects to no parking and asked why they are including it when it could potentially become their sticking point. Chair Bass said the background could be strengthened by including the vision and the robust process that got them to this point. She suggested changing "Residents in these neighborhoods tend to become isolated due to the lack of walkable streets." She said it is probably a factual statement but is most likely not backed up by data. She suggested changing it to lack of walkability is associated with less social connectedness or another sentence that communicates isolation instead of calling them isolated. Another suggestion was whenever bicycle and pedestrian safety is referenced she would prefer to lead with pedestrians because most people can more closely associate with being a pedestrian. Finally, chair Bass said she struggles with using the term 'community engagement' because residents do not think of it this way, for example, she said street reconstruction is not community engagement, it is input and outreach. Defining the meaning and the levels of community engagement was suggested. Member Loeffelholz said there are a lot of references to multi modal but he could not find anything tangible listed. Member Janovy explained that the plan is heavy on background information; it does not talk enough about the how and where to implement. Member Loeffelholz said he likes the vision statement but he has no idea what was being implemented. Planner Nolan suggested adding a sentence to address this. Member lyer said there are so many parallel things going on — Sidewalk Plan, Comprehensive Plan, etc. Planner Nolan said they all feed into the Living Streets Plan. Member lyer said he was concerned that there are no end dates associated with any of the plans. To clarify member lyer's concern, chair Bass said it sounded like he was asking that they include dates to hold themselves accountable and member lyer agreed. Member Nelson said the Sidewalk Map is implemented with street reconstruction. Member Janovy suggested tying the Pavement Condition Index with neighborhoods that has sidewalks on the map. Tracy Avenue /Valley View Road /Valley Lane Roundabout: Preliminary Layout Planner Nolan said staff is seeking feedback on the preliminary layout. He said staff was looking at improving this intersection because of the future Nine Mile Creek Trail that will cross here, plus ongoing traffic and pedestrian complaints. Planner Nolan said other improvements that have been considered but are not feasible for various reasons included a traffic signal, overpass, tunnel, and a rapid flashing beacon. Planner Nolan said MNDOT is hesitant to deviate from approved designs unless there are compelling reasons. A meeting is scheduled for Mar. 23 to gather input from the public. Discussion • Adding a sidewalk on the eastside of Tracy leading up TH -62 bridge was asked about and planner Nolan said it is being considered for 2016. 3 Member Janovy said it seemed the roundabout is the preferred option and asked what led staff to believe there is a queuing problem. Planner Nolan said queuing was only one of the problems. Chair Bass said she's witnessed queuing on Valley L and also on Tracy in the mornings and imagined the afternoons are the same as well. She said drivers come from the bri at high speeds and the improvement would slow them down. Member Nelson said it does not look like the improvement will help the trail because of the trail location in proximity to the roundabout and asked about a tunnel but this is not feasible because of the creek. He is concerned that staff is asking for input but the roundabout seemed to be the only option and questioned why residents would want to attend the meeting. Member Loeffelholz asked if there were any plans to improve the exit ramp off TH -62 to Tracy and also Antrim. Planner Nolan said the exit ramp is MNDOT'sjurisdiction and Antrim is being looked at in conjunction with the school district's referendum. Member La Force said he would like to see a solution that create gaps but recognized that the problem wasn't just at the intersection — it extends much further away. Student member Campbell said he avoids this area because of the left turn and use 70th & Antrim instead. He said this solution does not create gaps but the roundabout is probably better. Student member Rummel said left turns from Valley View on to Tracy at TH -62 is also difficult and wondered if this area would be improved as a result. Member Janovy said it does not look ideal for children. Chair Bass suggested a cycle track and also asked if staff would consider a temporary simulation such as placing bollards that would act like a roundabout to see the effect before placing something permanently. Planner Nolan said anything they tr� would have to meet State Aid requirements. Chair Bass said she favors something that will slow traffic and the roundabout seems to be it. Maybe look at each scenario separately — trail, traffic, pedestrian. Member lyer said he would like to know the roundabout costs compared to other options. Updates Student Members Student member Campbell said it was interesting learning about how to build roads more effectively to minimize infiltration in his environmental class and the parallel discussions that the ETC has. Student member Rummel said she watched a You Tube video on solar roadways that melts snow and creates energy. She said Edina should be progressive and try it. Bike Edina Working Group Member Janovy said assistant engineer Patrick Wrase attended their meeting and shared upcoming projects and asked for feedback. She said they will be organizing a bike ride but it is not planned yet. Living Streets Working Group See the Draft Living Streets Plan discussion above. Walk Edina Working Group Member Boettge said a member resigned and she nominated a replacement. 4 • Motion was made by member Boettge and seconded by member Janovy to approve John Hamilton to the Walk Edina Working Group. All voted aye. Motion carried. Member Boettge said they discussed goals and work plan and they've decided to focus on doing a walking audit and asked for input on locations. She mentioned Strachauer Park because two members live in the area. She said they also talked about creating a brochure of walking routes. Member Janovy suggested including walking time from one destination to another. Communications Committee — None. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson said he attended a webinar on Bicycle Stress Level Mapping that focused on mapping the stress level of bike routes. He said if a section of the route is rated at the highest stress level, the entire route is rated as such. He will email the web link. Member lyer said the 4th annual Edina Environmental Forum is taking place at the high school, Apr. 8, 6 -7 p.m. Member La Force said while on vacation in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia, he developed a new appreciation for curb cuts because of an incident that required him to push a wheelchair. Member Loeffelholz thanked everyone for welcoming him to the ETC. Member Janovy said Speak Up, Edina! street lighting offers no context or education and this is a general feeling about Speak Up, Edina! She said she was concerned with the message board on Valley View Rd because it was in the bike lane and the message was incorrect because the issue being addressed wasn't traffic. She said the message board should be used for notification of hazards. She asked if when Tracy, south of Benton is to be constructed, if this will open the discussion again about the Benton /Tracy intersection and planner Nolan said he didn't know if it would. Member Boettge said she is concerned about the intersections at France Ave where drivers continue to pull into the crosswalk and are not looking for pedestrians before turning right. Planner Nolan said they are still evaluating stop bars for these intersections. Chair Bass made changes to the minutes. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member lyer to approve amended minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. STAFF COMMENTS Resources available to boards and commissions were distributed. The City was not awarded the Active Routes to School grant for the Cornelia Drive Sidewalk in part because it could not demonstrate that there were safety issues such as crashes and also because of the lack of involvement by the school district. The sidewalk will be installed and paid for from the PACS Fund. Regarding the ETC survey suggestion, planner Nolan said staff reviewed what was submitted and selected some questions and will be meeting with the communications department next for feedback. The plan is to use the survey two years before street reconstruction. A meeting was held last week to discuss the proposed noise wall at 50`h from TH -100 to Vernon and residents were supportive. The noise wall is on MNDOT's schedule for 2016. MNDOT will fund 90% and residents assessed 10% or $3,000/$2,000/$1,000 in a 3- tiered system. 0 Hennepin County is taking applications for 2015 to fund sidewalks and staff plans to apply for funds for Xerxes Ave which is on the County's priority map. You may recall, last year the City received funding from the County for two sidewalks. Tracy Ave reconstruction from Benton to crosstown was approved last week by City Council. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned. ATTENDANCE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D SM SM WS # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 3 NAME Bass, Katherine TERM 2/1/2017 1 1 1 (Enter Date) (Enter Date) (Enter Date) 3 100% Boett e, Emil 2/1/2017 1 1 1 3 100% I er, Su rya 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 100% LaForce, Tom 3/1/2018 1 1 2 67% Loeffelholz, Ralf 1 1 100% Janovy, Jennifer 2/1/2017 1 1 1 3 100% Nelson, Paul 2/1/2016 1 1 1 3 100% Olson, Larry 2/1/2016 1 1 2 67% Whited, Courtney 2/1/2015 1 1 100% S anhake, Dawn 2/1/2016 1 1 1 3 100% Rummel, Anna 9/1/2015 1 1 2 67% Campbell, Jack 9/1/2015 1 1 33% to 9 MINUTES • OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION March 24, 2015 7:00 PM City Hall — Community Room I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Arseneault called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Chair Arseneault, Commissioners Burza, Davis, Gates, Kennedy, Sanders, Seidman, Tian, Vecchio - Smith, and Weinert. Staff present: HRRC Staff Liaison MJ Lamon and City Management Fellow Lindy Crawford. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Commissioner Seidman to approve the Regular Meeting Agenda of March 24, 2015. The motion was seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF FEBRUARY 24, 2015 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Commissioner Kennedy moved to approve the minutes as presented to the HRRC. Commissioner Seidman seconded. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. • VI. WELCOME NEW MEMBERS The HRRC existing members and new members introduced themselves. VII. GUEST SPEAKER: Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager Assistant City Manager Kurt shared a presentation about Vision Edina. Vision Edina is a broad - based community visioning process. It will serve as the foundation for the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plan. Kurt shared that reports are available for review on the City of Edina website. The HRRC was encouraged to share feedback about the Draft Strategic Vision and Framework report. The HRRC discussed writing an advisory communication for City Council. This will be discussed further at the HRRC April Regular Meeting. Arseneault asked the HRRC if any members would like to volunteer to form a committee in order to draft an advisory communication for HRRC review in April. Commissioners Vecchio -Smith and Tian volunteered. VIII. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS A. Work Plan Initiative Updates a) Community Outreach Commissioner Davis updated the HRRC about the Community Conversations working group. The March 18 and 24 scheduled sessions were postponed and turned into working group meetings. The working group is in process of determining if it is feasible to hold the postponed sessions in late April. . b) Human Rights City Designation Commissioner Kennedy shared that a working group meeting was held last week. They hope to select critical issues identified by the City of Edina to work on, which may include affordable housing, income disparity and domestic violence. The working group is preparing a short presentation on their work to address local organizations that represent the community such as the League of Women Voters, • Edina Senior Center, Edina Rotary, Southdale YMCA, and Edina Chamber of Commerce. The working group hopes to have a rough draft by April and is planning the first presentation for June 3rd at the Minneapolis Rotary. In response to inquiries about the project goals, Kennedy will provide the UN's guidelines to become a Human Rights City to HRRC members at the April meeting. c) Days of Remembrance /Genocide Awareness Commissioner Seidman noted that this year's event will be held on April 19d' from 1:00 - 3:30pm at City Hall. Posters have been hung around the city and a press release will go out this week. HRRC members were encouraged to invite others to the event. d) Affordable Housing Chair Arseneault and Staff Liaison Lamon updated the HRRC about the Greater Southdale area planning process. Lamon explained the process and encouraged any HRRC member to attend the meeting if he or she is available. e) Body Image and Sexuality Awareness Student Commissioner Gates shared she has been establishing questions and contacts to interview supportive parents and grandparents of teens to discuss how they feel about their children/grandchildren identifying with sexuality. Gates is still working on where the information will be posted. f) Human Trafficking Student Commissioner Weinert shared she is working with the moderator to establish • questions for the panel discussion for the human trafficking event to be held on April 9d' from 6:30- 8:30pm at City Hall. The focus of the event will be prevention and vulnerability awareness. HRRC members were encouraged to invite others to the event. Posters and press releases are being finalized with the City's Communications department. B. Establishing 2015 Committee and Working Group Chairs and Members HRRC looked through the roster and decided to officially sign up for committees and working groups at the April Regular Meeting after members had more time to consider their interest. A motion was made by Sanders to dissolve the HRRC nominating committee. Seidman seconded. Kennedy and Davis abstained. Motion carried. Commissioner Tian volunteered to chair the blog subcommittee. Tian also volunteered to chair the website administration subcommittee. Seidman volunteered to work on the bias offense subcommittee as a member. Vecchio -Smith volunteered to be a member on the affordable housing subcommittee. Arsenault volunteered to be a member on the community conversations working group. C. League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions Staff Liaison Lamon submitted the HRRC dues and is waiting to receive a meeting schedule from the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions. D. 2015 MN Legislative Session on Human Rights • Commissioner Kennedy shared that the Minnesota legislature introduced a bill (SF 1703) to designate the second Monday in October as the American Indian and Indigenous Peoples Day. The bill passed unanimously in its first Senate committee hearing. Kennedy • reported that the legislature will not take up a conflict minerals resolution this legislative session. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITION Staff Liaison Lamon passed out a thank you letter from Beacon Interfaith thanking the HRRC for considering their nomination for the Tom Oye Award. X. CHAIR, COMMISSION MEMBER, AND STUDENT COMMENTS None. XI. STAFF COMMENTS Lamon asked that those who have not signed up for the Boards and Commission Annual Meeting on April 20'h to please do so. If members would like to attend the Volunteer Recognition event on April 29t" they should sign up through Lamon. Lamon will resend the website link to the HRRC. XII. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Commissioner Kennedy to adjourn the March 24th meeting, Seidman seconded. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:23pm. • Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC April 28, 2015 40 MJ Lamon, HRRC Staff Liaison Pat Arseneault, HRRC Chair MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 7, 2015 10:15 P.M. • CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 10:15 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Meeting Agenda. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 17, 2015 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 17, 2015 Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. 7101 FRANCE AVENUE, RUE DE FRANCE EASEMENT SETTLEMENT, HAZELTON ROAD IMIPROVEMENT BA-417 Executive Director Neal noted the roadway improvement project was authorized by City Council & HRA in June 2013. The majority of the Hazelton Road Improvement project was completed in 2014, with completion of the final elements anticipated in 2015. Mr. Neal explained the feasibility study showed a schematic of a • standard four access point roundabout to serve traffic and four adjacent properties. Such a design required the Rue de France and Guitar Center properties to agree on a cross - access easement that would allow patrons of each business to share a single driveway to enter and exit the properties. After prolonged negotiations, the owners were unable to come to an agreement on a cross - access easement. Staff developed an alternate roundabout design with five access points that would provide a separate access point for each of the properties and constructed the project with that revised alignment. • Mr. Neal noted that as stated in the feasibility report, "permanent right -or -way and temporary easements will be needed from the Rue de France, Guitar Center, Szechaun Star, and Byerly's. Staff anticipated all right -of- way needed would be donated by the adjacent properties ". All easements were donated with the exception of the Rue de France property. Nr. Neal said the City negotiated a settlement value for the permanent easement of $142,000, to be funded by the Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Stewart made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the settlement agreement and authorizing the City Attorney to execute the Stipulation of Settlement. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:17 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director Page I 4 • 0 To: Members of Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: May 6, 2015 w9�N� ,l� �y roRe�. Agenda Item #: HRA V. Subject: HRA Resolution 2015 -01 Supporting Affordably- Priced Housing at 3330 West 66th Street Action Requested: Approve HRA Resolution 2015 -01 Information / Background: Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ This item is identical to City Council Agenda Item VIII. D. Please refer to that document for complete information. Staff recommends that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority approve this Resolution. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 This page intentionally left blank. • 0 0 • EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF EDINA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -01 SUPPORTING AFFORDABLY - PRICED HOUSING AT 3330 WEST 66T" STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: WHEREAS, the project being developed by the Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative (the "Developer ") consists of 39 efficiency apartment units targeted as affordably - priced housing for teenagers and young adults who were formerly homeless (the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the City Council approved the re- zoning of the property in October 2014 and modified the Comprehensive Plan to allow this type of use in the developers preferred location in November 2014 after concurrence by the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, the Developer acquired the property in October 2014 and is currently seeking funding from several sources to construct the project in 2016; and WHEREAS, a variety of grants or other public financial assistance will be required to build the Project including housing tax credits from the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the "MHFA "); and WHEREAS, the Project will be designed to encourage increased walkability in the Southdale district; and WHEREAS, the Project will be developed with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174 to 469.1794 (the "TIF Act "); and WHEREAS, the Project will be developed consistent with Resolution 2014 -139 and Ordinance 2014 -17 allowing affordable housing with supportive service in the Regional Medical District; and WHEREAS, the Project is estimated to cost approximately $10,505,000 and the Developer is requesting $550,000 in tax increment from the City; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer will negotiate and enter into a Redevelopment Agreement governing the Project and will satisfy all requirements of the TIF Act; and WHEREAS, the City will establish a new housing TIF district pursuant to the TIF Act and 2014 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 308, Article 6, Section 8 (the "Edina Legislation ") that will include the Property (the "Housing TIF District "). The tax increment within the Housing TIF District for the Project will be generated from the City of Edina, Southdale 2 tax increment district (the " Southdale 2 district ") in reliance on the Edina Legislation; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a tax increment financing district for the Project and the pledging of the tax increment to secure a loan for the project is a local contribution and will assist the Developer in securing the approvals from the MHFA for housing tax credits. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina endorses the Developer's application for housing tax credits as administered by MHFA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority shall provide, in accordance with the requirements of this Resolution, a total of $550,000 in order to facilitate the financing of the Project. If MHFA funding is not approved by December I, 2016, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority may rescind its financing commitment to the Project in order to fund another affordable housing project. Dated: May 6, 2015 40 Attest: James B. Hovland, Chair Ann Swenson, Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 2015, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of the City this day of 2015. Scott Neal, Executive Director 0