Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-02-18_COUNCIL MEETING
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2014 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such.items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of February 3, 2014 and Work Session of February 3, 2014 B. Receive Payment of Claims as per: Pre -List Dated, 2/6 /2014 TOTAL $966,035.00 and per Pre - List Dated, 2/13/2014 TOTAL $696,182.61 C. Traffic Safety Report, January 2, 2014 D. Resolution No. 2014 -13 Requesting Variance From Standards For State Aid Operation For West 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue E. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -3 Bredesen Park D & Countryside F Neighborhood Roadway Improvements F. Request For Purchase — Award Of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -5 Strauchauer Park B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements G. Request For Purchase — Six 2013 Ford PI Utility Vehicles H. August 5, 2013 City Council Minutes Correction I. Temporary 3.2 Beer License Our Lady of Grace Church J. 2014 -2015 Bargaining Unit Contract For Police Officers V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Gregory Banko & Jason Dockter, South View Middle School, 4th Annual Taste of South View Cultural Celebration B. Tom Schmitz, Edina Fire Chief C. Speak Up Edina Monthly Report VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to dll speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Agenda/Edina City Council February 18, 2014 Page 2. • Individuals must- limit their testimony to three ::minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not. allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING - 2014 Community Development Block Grant, Resolution No. 2014 -22, (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) 'B. PUBLIC HEARING — 50th & France Avenue Parking And Wayfinding Improvement No. P -23, Resolution No. 2014 -18 (Favorable roll call vote of four Council Members to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — Modifying Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, Establishing Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District And Tax Increment, Financing Plan, Resolution No. 2014 -23 (Favorable, roll call vote o f majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to .share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might. re fer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. City of Edina and Edina Public Schools Partnership Goals B. New On -Sale Wine & Beer On -Sale Liquor Licenses, Red Savoy C. Sports Dome, Outdoor Rink And Arena Improvements Budget Estimate Update & Bid Authorization D. Final Plat, Development Agreements & Preservation Easements — Acres Dubois, Frank Sidell, Property Located Between Little Street And Morningside Road, Resolution No. 2014 -20 E. Southdale Medical Building; 6525 France Avenue — Amend Conditions Of Approval To Build The Proof -of- Parking Plan, Resolution No. 2014 -21 F. Resolution No. 2014 -19 Accepting Various Donations G. Parking Permit Policy And Fees In 50th & France Commercial District, Ordinance No. 2014 -2 (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Art & Culture Commission, December 19, 2013 A` Tues Tues Tues Wed Tues Tues Mon Tues es jes Tues Tues Tues Agenda/Edina City Council . February 18, 2014 Page 3 2. Park Board Minutes, January 14, 2014 3. Heritage Preservation Board, January 14, 2014 4. Planning Commission, January 8 and January 22, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING A. GENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Meeting of February 3, 2014 V. AUTHORIZATION TO FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 50TH AND FRANCE. PARKING RAMPS VI. RESOLUTION NO: 2014 =1 MODIFYING SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ESTABLISHING PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN VII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Feb 18 Work Session — Naming & Donation Policy. 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Feb 18 Joint Work Session With Park Board 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Feb 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Feb 19 Board and Commission Interviews 5:30 — 7:30 P.M. MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM Mar 4 Work Session —Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regional Trail Update /Destination Marketing Orgnaization Mar 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mar 17 Board and Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting 5:00 P.M. HUGHES PAVILION CENTENNAL LAKES Mar 18 Work Session — Bike Edina Task Force /Joint Meeting With ETC 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mar 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Apr 1 Work Session- Watershed District Partnership /Utilities Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Apr 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Apr 22 Business Meeting/Joint Meeting With Arts & Culture Comm. 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Apr 22 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Inside this issue: Note from 1 Helen's Story 2 Senior Center Fun 2 Compassion 2 Your Gift Matters: Honor a loved one with a financial gift to Senior Community Services. Your gift of $25, $50, $150 or another amount of your choosing will brighten the day in so many ways. You may give securely online at: www.seniorcommunity.org Checks may be mailed to: Senior Community Services Attn: Development 10201 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 335 Minnetonka. MN 55305 Thank you for making a difference in the lives of seniors. Connect With Us! *Visit our homepage at www.seniorcommunity.org *Subscribe to our e- newsletter by clicking 'Subscribe to Our Newslet- ter' at the bottom of our website. ffftin A". Reimagine Aging Senior Community Services Reimagine Aging, Together By: Deb Taylor, CEO Welcome! I want to share a story with you. And you're a main character. In fact, we all play a role because we have parents, grand- parents and other older loved ones who need care and support as they age. Think back for a moment. When we were kids, those loving adults in our lives carted us around town with our bikes, skateboards and backpacks. Remember? It wasn't always convenient, but they did it out of love. Now, its our turn to accom- modate a generation of older adults, to make our community as welcoming and friendly to walkers and wheelchairs as it is to bikes, scooters and roller - blades. The older adults in our lives make us better. In fact, we stand on their shoulders in many ways. They deserve all that we can provide to ensure they live vital lives of dignity. I'm so grateful my parents can still enjoy life; it's a blessing to be able to spend fun, quality time with them. But as their daugh- ter, I see how their needs evolve and change over time. I also see how my role changes, too. Aging in Place There are tens of thou- sands of older adults across the suburban metro area teetering on that fine line between living inde- pendently at home and dependence in a senior All Living Things Are Connected- t - . w, Deb enjoying time with her parents care facility. Most seniors prefer to age in place at home. Our goal at Senior Community Services is to support their independence as long as possible with services that make life manageable. This may involve assisting them with household duties they can no longer manage alone, helping ease their isolation and loneliness at our many senior centers, helping them navigate the seem- ingly endless depths of complex healthcare op- tions (and saving them money) and providing care coordination help for care- givers who dutifully do all they can day in and day out - out of love. Love does not overcome a lack of endurance We've seen how caregiv- ing can take a toll. Eventu- ally love is not enough. A caregiver can become run- down, exhausted, from the endless responsibilities day after day. Across Min- nesota, family and friends provide more than 90 per- cent of care for seniors living at home. However, most of these caregivers have no formal training in geriatric care, treatment or rehabilitation practices. Numerous studies show that many caregivers die before the loved one for whom they care. Thankfully, Senior Commu- nity Services is able to help them reimagine life in a healthier way that meets their needs. And we give xr 5 them tools, like the innova- tive website CareNextion, to better manage their lives. The needs will only grow. The 'age wave' is upon us as 78 million members of the baby boom generation - the largest in human history - continue to retire at a rate of 10,000 a day. We are increasingly an older popu- lation. In about 15 years, one in four Minnesotans will be 65 or older. Thankfully there are a lot of helpers because we're all part of the solution. We can all do something. Being a senior has always represented the pinnacle of an era. We become a high school or college senior and we're at the top of our academic years. Later, we may become a senior exec- utive at the top of our pro- fession. Finally, we all be- come senior citizens, at the very pinnacle of life itself. It can be a wondrous, fulfilling time - for everyone - with the right support. We are able to do this thanks to generous support from the community, in time, talent, and resources. As we look ahead, we invite you to walk this journey with us. Thank you for your support. Sincerely, Deb Taylor Chief Executive Officer Senior Center Fun! Our senior centers have full schedules of fun, engaging activities: dining, fitness classes, card clubs, education and art classes, blood pressure checks, and day trips. Ease isolation and loneliness. Join the fun! For the latest information on what's happening near you, visit www.seniorcommunity.org and click on Programs then Senior Centers. Choir Camp Computer Class at Crow River Gratitude "I can continue to live independently, thanks to Senior Community Services." Helen, 82, has lived in her modest, west metro home for 53 years, but she worried that her days of independence might be numbered. While in good health, Helen struggled to accomplish many strenuous household tasks like snow - shoveling, window - washing and raking the fall leaves. Helen considered moving to an assisted - living apartment, but the cost made her nervous, and a move would place her farther from her children, grand- children, and neighborhood friends. Thankfully, Helen's daughter discovered the Household & Outside Mainte- nance for Elderly (HOME) program. The HOME program provides affordable services for seniors 60 and older through a network of staff, volunteers, and independent contractors. Seniors contribute to the cost of the services based on their monthly income and their ability to pay. HOME also accepts some insurance payments as well as the Elderly Waiver and the Alternative Care Grant. "Thanks to Senior Community Services, I can live in my own home longer and enjoy my neighborhood. I'm so grateful," Helen says. "HOME is a wonderful way to help seniors maintain independence and give caregivers a break from household duties," says Sue Gallus, HOME director. For more information on the Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly program call 952 - 746 -4046. For details on Senior Community Services' con- stellation of other services for seniors and their caregivers, visit www. seniorcom m unity. org. �`�Ca reNextion Senior Community Services has put the compassion in technology. CareNextion, is a free, easy -to -use website .ali Ci :i'ii .g y our family m-em be rs. and oth er care groups t o ca c .iI y communicate, ,,'-, ire schedules and access valuable e resources. CareNextion is a time -saver and a headache - reliever for caregivers who juggle schedules and coordinate care for an older adult. Visit www.carenextion.orc today for more information. To speak with a friendly staff member, please call 612 - 770 -7005. 10201 Wayzata Boulevard Senior Phone, 952 - 541 -1019 Suite 335 Fax: 952 - 541 -0841 Minnetonka, MN 55305 Reinnagine Aging Community www,seniorcommunity.org Services ` MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 2014 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:13 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda as amended to remove HRA Agenda Item VI. Authorization to Fund Capital Improvements at 50`h and France Parking Ramps. Manager Neal advised that the draft Joint Operating Goals with the School District would be presented to the Council at its February 18, 2014, meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Item IV.C., Request for Purchase, Utley Park Well House Facility, Professional Engineering Services, as follows: W.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of January 21, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 23, 2014, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $310,763.34; Working Capital Fund $22,344.06; Art Center Fund $2,265.93; Golf Dome Fund $383,771.58; Aquatic Center Fund $27.90; Golf Course Fund $5,383.92; Ice Arena Fund $8,422.04; Sports Dome Fund $75,240.00; Edinborough Park Fund $8,039.57; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,307.29; Liquor Fund $237,283.00; Utility Fund $33,979.50; PSTF Agency Fund $18,630.38; Centennial TIF District $3,350.00; Grandview TIF District $6,500; Southdale 2 District $600.00; Payroll Fund $2,731.38; TOTAL $1,122,639.89 ; and dated January 30, 2014, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $565,609.36; Police Special Revenue $2,477.42; Working Capital Fund $98,878.09; Art Center Fund $7,248.02; Golf Dome Fund $90896.79; Aquatic Center Fund $257.30; Golf Course Fund $1,807.64; Ice Arena Fund $11,165.23; Edinborough Park Fund $12,417.99; Centennial.. Lakes Park Fund $4,127.26; Liquor Fund $201,906.83; Utility Fund $25,338.05; Storm Sewer Fund $830.25; PSTF Agency Fund $5,853.88; Centennial TIF District $9,379.01; TOTAL $957.193.12 and for receipt of payment of claims; and, Credit Card Transactions dated November 26 — December 25, 2013; TOTAL $39,216.93 IV G Request far Purc-hase, Utley P2rk Wall WOWS Farillity, Pmfancean2l ;ngineeFiAg SPRACPS IV.I. Approve Revision to City's Purchasing Policies and Requirements Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, UTLEY PARK WELL HOUSE FACILITY, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES —AWARDED Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2014 4 Manager Neal indicated the City required contractors to use its master template for Engineering Service Agreements and Bolton & Menk had agreed to the City's standard terms. It was noted the costs remained the same. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, awarding Request for Purchase, Utley Park Well House Facility, Professional Engineering Services, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bolton & Menk Consulting Engineers & Surveyors at $28,335.00, using the City's standard Master Engineering Service Agreement. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS None. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented. and ordered placed on file. VI.A. NEW ON -SALE INTOXICATING & SUNDAY ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES, NAKAMORI, JAPANESE, INC., D.B.A. NAKAMORI JAPANESE BISTRO, 7.101 FRANCE AVENUE #113 City Clerk Mangen presented the application of Nakamori, Japanese Inc., for new On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday On -Sale Liquor Licenses for Nakamori Japanese Bistro at 7101 France Avenue, #113, and staffs recommendation for approval as there had been no negative findings. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving a the request of Nakamori, Japanese Inc., for new On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday On -Sale Liquor. Licenses for Nakamori Japanese Bistro at 7101 France Avenue, #113. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Teresa Lin, representing Nakamori Japanese Bistro, described their menu offerings and invited all to visit. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment.. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VHI.A. DRAFT EDINA ACTIVE ROUTES TO SCHOOL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — PRESENTED JoNette KuRnaw, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., presented the Edina Active Routes to School (ARTS) Comprehensive Plan that identified opportunities and priorities to increase safe physical activity including walking and biking to school. She then presented recommendations for implementation, of short-term, mid -term, and long -term investments. Page 2 k 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3; 2014 The Council discussed the report and noted the following: on page E3, the link on Oaklawn Avenue in the Cornelia area was missing, though it was included on the map exhibit; on page 7, Safety, first paragraph, a campaign for driver education /awareness should be added; and,. on page 26, the School District should be identified as the program implementation lead within school zones. The Council supported moving forward with short-term improvements not tied to adoption of the Plan such as allowing bicycles on sidewalks with limits on speed, requirement to give right of way to pedestrians in all cases, and not allowing bicycles on posted sidewalks, ^�'�'F^S°O^^ +h^ ^ ^ ^,� ^f , .,, l;r +� standardization of crosswalks throughout the City; and; continuing- the City's rolling enforcement program. Ms. Ku #naw answered questions of the Council relating to components of the report. The Council thanked all who were involved in creation of this report, noting it was a profound work. VIII. B. SKETCH PLAN 3923 49r" STREET— REVIEWED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request to rezone to R -2 to allow tearing down of a single - family home and construction of a double dwelling unit at 3923 49th Street. This property was 9,000 square-feet and located adjacent to the 50th and France retail area. Proponent Presentation Mathias, Mortenson, architect representing the proponent, described the intended environmentally - friendly construction and design that would allow the proponents to age in place as they wanted to remain within this neighborhood. The Council discussed the proposal and asked questions of Messrs. Teague and Mortenson. Mr. Teague advised of the need for a three -foot side yard setback variance for the'proposed retaining wall. ' He stated if'the property was zoned R -1 and a tear down /rebuild oroject,' the maximum lot coverage would be 25.5% on this site. The Council offered the following direction: reconfigure the garages to require one driveway /curb cut and lower impervious surface; assure safety (guardrail /fence /landscaping) was sufficient along the retaining wall; Eans•ider�t+ens to refine the building plan to lower I lot coverage /building height /hardscape; assure architectural elements and site components meet the essential character of the existing neighborhood; and, consider feasibility of repurposing the existing single - family home. VIII.C. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -01 — CHAPTER 10 REGARDING RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT ENFORCEMENT— ADOPTED Mr. Teague explained the minor revisions made to Chapter 10 relating to residential redevelopment. The Council discussed the wording and agreed with the following clarifications: Page 1, Section 2.(3), seventh line, should indicate: "...the applicant must provide a detailed plans." Page 2, Section 3.(b), last sentence should be replaced with: "Work is prohibited on Sundays and holidays." Member Swenson made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -01, Amending Chapter 10 of the Edina City Code Concerning Residential Redevelopment Enforcement, with changes noted. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2014 4 Rollcall: . Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -18 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution.and approved by four, favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle_ introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -18 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. B. MINUTES: 1. VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE, DECEMBER 20, 2013 , 2. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, DECEMBER 19, 2013,. 3. EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, DECEMBER 2,2013 4. HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION, NOVEMBER 11, 2013 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE— Received Xl. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI.A. POSSIBLE BIKE ON SIDEWALK ORDINANCE — REFERRED TO ETC Motion by Member. Sprague, seconded by Member Bennett, to refer a possible bike on sidewalk ordinance to the Edina Transportation Commission for recommendation. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ; XI. B. WEST 54' STREET PROJECT — RECONSIDERED AND REVISED Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Swenson, to reconsider approval of the West 54th Street Project and reopen to discussion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. City Engineer Millner stated on December 10, 2013, the Council authorized creation of bid documents but the project was not yet awarded. Attorney Knutson advised that another public hearing might be required unless the adjustment does not increase the cost of the project or assessments. The Council discussed whether to modify the West 54th Street project design to narrow the two parking lanes (east of the creek to France Avenue) from eight feet to seven feet and allocate that space to a three -foot grass boulevard in lieu of one -foot exposed aggregate concrete boulevard in the eastern section. City Attorney Knutson advised of the option to consider such a design change through a change order after the project was ordered since it would not impact assessments. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 3, 2014 Mr. Millner explained if the City received approval of the advisory bike lane marking by FHWA and the lane widths by State Aid, an additional variance from State Aid would not be necessary for the revision under discussion. The Council acknowledged the resident request that the project be reduced an additional two feet; however, that would not allow advisory bike lanes, adequate space for snow storage, or needed margin of safety. Motion by Member Sprague, seconded by Member Swenson, to revise the design of the West 54th Street Project narrowing to seven feet the parking lanes on each side of 54th Avenue east of Minnehaha Creek to France Avenue and replacing the one -foot exposed aggregate concrete boulevard with a three -foot grass boulevard on the north side of West 54th Street, next to a five -foot sidewalk. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. X11. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X111. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 18, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 3, 2014, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY3, 2014 5:04 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were: Members Bennett, Brindle, and Mayor Pro Tern Swenson. Member Sprague entered the meeting at '5:07 p.m. Mayor Hovland entered the meeting at 6:10 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting:. Laura Adler, Water Resource Coordinator; Ross Bintner, Environmental Engineer; Annie Coyle, City Manager Fellow; .Jamie Cynor, Engineering Technician; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, City Engineer; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager and Cary Teague, Community Development Director. Mark Ruff and Nick Anhut, Consultants from Ehlers Associates were in attendance. RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT UPDATE "Cindy Larson, Residential Redevelopment Coordinator made a presentation covering various aspects of redevelopment including common concerns, remedies, effective changes and next steps. She presented a pie charge illustrating a breakdown of common concerns received to date as follows: general questions - °29 %, street congestion -23 %, drainage questions /concerns -9 %, street conditions -8 %, construction hours allowed questions /violations -8 %, addition /remodel concerns -5 %, health & safety -5 %, property dam4ge -3 %, neighborhood meeting -2 %, encroachment questions -2 %, tree removal concerns -2 %, dust -2 %, noise volume- I% and erosion- I%. Ms. Larson outlined the remedies employed to date such as communication with permit holders on code compliance, parking restriction by Edina`PD, coordination of various City departments answering questions and remedying issues, scheduling meetings between builders and residents, and issuing parking tickets, stop work.Orders and collecting escrow funds. She reviewed the effective changes and outlined proposed next steps. Council members commented on feedback to date, areas of concern and issues to be concentrated upon in the upcoming construction season. Next steps discussed were: enforcement clarifications, noting that an ordinance amendment will allow the redevelopment, coordinator to issue tickets, enforcement guidelines to be implemented, critical topic handouts under development, website presence for residents and permit holders, code clarifications, i:e. shoring plans or dust control, and drainage policy review. City Engineer Millner explained current regulations and ordinances. He noted what has been working as well as problem areas noting stormwater ordinance revisions requiring engineer designed plans. Additionally, Mr. Millner explained changes in his department including an expanded checklist and longer review time. He acknowledged areas of challenge and outlined some possible changes. The Council and staff discussed potential areas to change. It was noted that some ordinance changes are still being drafted; the possibility of developing an approach inventing compliance and penalizing infractions was suggested. PENTAGON PARK TIF Economic Development Manager Neuendorf noted that several consultants were in attendance to participate in the discussion and asked the group to introduce themselves. Those in attendance included: Scott Tankenoff of Hillcrest Development and several of his team: Charlie Nestor, Hillcrest Development; Tom Whitlock, Damon Farber Associates; Bob Close, Bob Close Studio; Kristina Smitten, Smitten'Group; Mark Rauenhorst, Marren Properties; Tony Gleekel, Siegel Brill, PA; Heather Burns and Bob Strachota, Shenehon Company; and Jim Nelson, Eberhardt Advisory, LLC Minutes -Work Session /Edina City Council /February 3, 2014 Mr. Neuendorf and Consultant Mark Ruff (Ehlers Associates) outlined the general rationale for establishing a new tax increment financing (TIF) District that could assist in the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park area. They noted several reasons why a TIF District would be considered: existing buildings are outdated and substandard, major reinvestment needed to transform blighted area, high costs due to new storm water standards, high costs of soil stabilization, and the need for public roadway improvements. Mr. Ruff noted that the potential TIF District satisfies the essential provisions of state law: ((more than 50% substandard buildings that were reasonably distributed throughout the district). He also noted that all parcels would be within a single district,_the district would have a 26 -year term and newer buildings had been included due to potential public improvements and storm water needs. The redevelopment would be phased with initially 495,000 square feet office with a small amount of retail, a 425 room hotel, upgrades to 77t street and potential storm water improvements. Future phases would include an additional 800,000 — 900,000 square feet of additional office and supportive retail, along with new. public roadways and parking. When completed the estimated total project cost would approach $500,000,000. .. Mr. Ruff explained the anticipated Redevelopment Agreement would follow the pay -as- you -go concept and therefore,:the City would not be issuing,any bonds or assuming significant risk. Staff reviewed how the incremental taxes could be invested such as green streets, integrated stormwater retention, pedestrian improvements to West 77th Street, trail connections west to east, multimodal transportation connections and shared parking. Staff recommended the focus of the anticipated Redevelopment Agreement be on extraordinary redevelopment costs. They presented an initial. proposal for the investment of the incremental taxes. Items to be included in a term sheet were discussed.. Council discussed their views.on the, proposal of establishing a TIF District to assist the Pentagon Park Redevelopment. It was noted that the City Council would conduct a public hearing February 18th on the possible establishment of the district, modifications to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area and a TIF Plan. Staff indicated they anticipated a term sheet to be in its initial stages by March 18th with a redevelopment agreement to follow pending the outcome of the February 180 City Council hearing. /) Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, February 18, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor 2 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379692 216/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 82.80 334619 1760165 5842.5515 46.80 334620 1760164 5822.5515 129.60 379693 21612014 133559 AHERN, SHEILA 85.78 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334759 020314 1470.4329 85.78 379694 21612014 130090 ALLIANT ENGINEERING INC. 2,616.25 EVALUATION STUDY 334590 54703 01255.1705.21 2,616.25 379695 216/2014 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 89.88 COFFEE 334662 32219 5730.5510 89.88 379696 216/2014 100665 AMSAN 53.35 TILEX SCUM REMOVER 00001489 334663 303643498 1646.6406 53.35 379697 21612014 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 155.00 PAGER BATTERIES 00003740 334664 42830 1470.6406 155.00 379698 21612014 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 6,317.00 COMMERCIAL PKG POLICY 334337 6100000150571 1550.6200 6,317.00 379699 2/6/2014 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 883.52 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334665 2055279 5730.5510 661.79 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334666 2058871 5730.5510 316.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334667 2060165 5730.5510 29.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334668 2058873 5761.5510 309.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334669 2058874 5761.5510 2,200.59 379700 21612014 101276 APRES 53.65 LINEN RENTAL 334748 158147 1100.6103 53.65 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX AMBULANCE FEES 2/412014 10:38:08 Page- 1 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING INSPECTION A255 WOODDALE BIKE RE- STRIPING COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVIG =S GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 334670 17556 CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 717.56 Council Check Register by GL 30,327.50 ENGINEERING /PLANNING SERVICES 334737 Council Check Register and Summary 04406.1705.20 1,967.00' 216/2014 — 2/6/2014 89.85 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379701 21612014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 5862.5514 Continued... VERNON SELLING 363.02 COFFEE 334409 1107560 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 363.02 636.00 334510 40198 379702 21612014 133556 ARNZEN ARMS LLC 50TH ST SELLING 5101.4413 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page- 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 717.56 GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 334670 17556 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 717.56 30,327.50 ENGINEERING /PLANNING SERVICES 334737 379703 216/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 04406.1705.20 1,967.00' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 89.85 334470 40200 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,224.00 334471 40199 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 713.00 334509 40197 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 636.00 334510 40198 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,662.85 379704 2/612014 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 57.00 LIGHT BAR 00005926 334671 10128058 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 57.00 379705 21612014 100256 AT&T MOBILITY 26.31 IPAD DATA SERVICE 334758 287240706569X01 1130,6160 DATA PROCESSING 379706 21612014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 30,327.50 ENGINEERING /PLANNING SERVICES 334737 23270354.13 -3 04406.1705.20 1,967.00' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 334736 23270354.00 -203 5960.6103 32,294.50 379707 216/2014 133547 BECK TOMLINSON, KOREN 23.40 ARTWORK SOLD 334414 012714 5101.4413 23.40 379708 2/612014 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 5,057.65 INSTALL NETTING - WEST RINK 334338 46 -107 5511.6180 1,208.28 SKATES 00002089 334672 00097305 5761.6406 6,265.93 379709 216/2014 130829 BECSOM'S ROOF TOP SHOP 548.00 REPAIR ROOF LEAK 334339 140009 5511.6136 548.00 CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS 2013 -14 FLOOD PROTECTION IMPR ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM ART CENTER REVENUES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 334621 41629400 5842.5515 CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 82.00 334622 41629300 5842.5515 Council Check Register by GL YORK SELLING 474.60 334623 41629200 5842.5512 Council Check Register and Summary YORK SELLING 219.10 334624 41629100 5842.5513 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 . YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv.No Account No Subledger Account Description 379709 216/2014 334779 41629600 130829 BECSOM'S ROOF TOP SHOP COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Continued... 379710 21612014 334780 41629500 129549 BEHLEN, NATE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 32.04 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334771 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 3.46 64.40 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX- YORK SELLING 379711 21612014 334783 89704300 133560 BEILMAN, LAVERN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 126.73 72.25 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 334752 013014 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 72.25 379712 21612014 133561 BELLAS, DEREK 65.00 ARTWORK SOLD 334753 013013 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 65.00 379713 21612014 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2/412014 10:38:08 Page - 3 Business Unit TRAINING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 36.55 334621 41629400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.00 334622 41629300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 474.60 334623 41629200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 219.10 334624 41629100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.55 334625 41632000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 91.55 334779 41629600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 200.05 334780 41629500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 32.04 334781 89704400 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3.46 334782 89704200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX- YORK SELLING 200.00 334783 89704300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 126.73 334784 6402400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 379714 21612014- 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 224.00 PIZZA 334340 D28IN1634 5520.5510 360.00 PIZZA 334673 D28IN1638 5730.5510 432.00 PIZZA 334674 D28IN1659 5730.5510 1,016.00 379715 216/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 107.38 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334341 108110 5520.5510 246.40 334511 109625 5842.5514 353.78 379716 21612014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 351.40 COFFEE 334342 1146845 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register and Summary 216/2014 — 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379716 21612014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued.:. 150.95 COFFEE 334444 1148799 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 502.35 379717 21612014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 87.08 WHITE BOARD 334675 OE- 344348 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTFADMINISTRATION 87.08 379718 216/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 62.38 CORK RAIL, HOOKS 00001457 334445 94188 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 62.38 379719 21612014 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC. 5,246.40 TRUNK SEWER LINING 334676 0163303 03485.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN TRUNK SS LINING 5,246.40 379720 216/2014 119351 BOURGETIMPORTS 648.50 334785 117889 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 648.50 379721 2/612014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PART'S 183.78 SPRING 00005925 334446 819419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 208.46 BRAKES 00005913 334677 815938 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.18- CREDIT 334678 CM771054 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 349.06 379722 216/2014 102785 BRIDGE FOR YOUTH, THE 6,500.00 2014 SUPPORT 334494 012814 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 6,500.00 379723 21612014 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 240.00 REPLACE DOOR LOCK 334679 5240095 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 240.00 379724 21612014 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,809.92 334512 426355 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 18.55 334513 426356 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 85.75 334786 427835 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,027.55 334787 427834 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,941.77 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379725 21612014 103268 CARLSON, DAVID Continued... 182.91 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334410 012914 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 182.91 379726 216/2014 121664 CARLSON, JACKIE 36.40 ART WORK SOLD 334416 012214 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 36.40 379727 216/2014 132774 CARLSON, NANCY 400.00 SPEAKING APPEARANCE 334412 FEB 8 2014 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 400.00 379728 216/2014 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 72.16 9546705 -6 334343 9546705 -1/14 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 4,255.32 5546504 -1 334447 5546504 -1/14 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 8,730.66 5591458 -4 334448 5591458 -1/14 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 226.01 5596524 -8 334449 5596524 -1114 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 238.71 10089900 -4 334450 10089900 -1/14 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.55 5590919 -6 334680 5590919 -1/14 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 2,134.90 5584304 -9 334681 5584304 -1/14 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 93.14 5584310-6 334682 5584310 -1/14 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWC-R 15,767.45 379729 21612014 123898 CENTURYLINK 69.39 952 922 -2444 334344 24441/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 58.56 952 920 -1586 334345 1586 -1/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 41.83 952 922 -9246 334495 9246 -1114 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.56 952 831 -0024 334683 00241114 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.26 952 920 -8632 334684 8632 -1/14 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 350.60 379730 21612014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 323.28 334788 0118344820 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 323.28 379731 2/6/2014 120433 COMCAST 110.61 8772 10 614 0396908 334685 396908 -1114 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 6.80 8772 10 614 0373022 334760 373022 -12/13 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.77 8772 10 614 0373022 334761 011714 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 124.18 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register and Summary 216/2014 — 2/612014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379732 21612014 133557 COMPASS PEER GROUP Continued... 1,200.00 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 334744 2014 DUES 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1,200.00 379733 21612014 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 327.40 RADIATOR REPAIRS 334451 19539 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 327.40 379734 2/612014 125232 CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER 2,000.00 2014 MEDIATION SERVICES 334346 EDINA -14 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 2,000.00 379735 2/6/2014 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC. -DARE 214.51 DARE SUPPLIES 00003023 334366 69565 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 214.51 379736 21612014 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 1,525.40 STAFF UNIFORMS 334686 25938 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 903.82 UNIFORM JACKETS 334687 25982 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,429.22 379737 21612014 130171 CTM SERVICES INC. 215.78 EDGER BLADES 00001507 334688 2969 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 215.78 379738 21612014 104020 DALCO 427.84 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001565 334689 2704987 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 427.84 379739 216/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,210.20 334472 737130 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 921.66 334514 737131 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 22.40 334515 737132 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,931.10 334516 737134 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22.40 334517 737133 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,193.80 334789 737135 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,301.56 379740 21612014 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334772 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 64.40 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 1 50TH STREET RUBBISH CITY OF EDINA 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE Council Check Register by GL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 379742 2/6/2014 Council Check Register and Summary 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 2/612014 — 2/6/2014 101407 EGAN, MATT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379740 21612014 101657 DEHN, BRUCE 4095.6103 Continued... 379741 2/612014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 3,941.48 REFUSE 334763 89.00 650243624 334690 650243624 -1/14 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page -_ 7 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 89.00 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 379742 2/6/2014 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 379747 216/2014 101407 EGAN, MATT 2,738.32 REFUSE 334762 DT0000696856 4095.6103 334773 020314 5919.6104 3,941.48 REFUSE 334763 DT0000696855 4095.6103 6,679.80 379748 21612014 100049 EHLERS 379743 216/2014 1,150.00 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 334591 347710 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,150.00 270.00 E- UTILITY BILLING AD 334411 68905 5902.6103 379749 2/612014 100049 EHLERS 270.00 270.00 379744 21612014 1375905- 6467487 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 9 3,636.00 % BOYS HOCKEY 334614 013014 5511.6136 1,957.50 % GIRLS HOCKEY 334614 013014 5511.6136 5,593.50 379745 21612014 106020 EDINA RESOURCE CENTER 40,660.00 2014 FUNDING 334746 012814 1507.6103 40,660.00 379746 216/2014 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page -_ 7 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 163.55 334790 990 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 163.55 379747 216/2014 101407 EGAN, MATT 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334773 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 64.40 379748 21612014 100049 EHLERS 1,150.00 50TH & FRANCE PARKING PROJ 334591 347710 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,150.00 379749 2/612014 100049 EHLERS 270.00 REGISTRATION -BILL NEUENDORF 334764 1375905- 6467487 9232.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 9 270.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:06 Council Check Register by GL Page - a Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379750 21612014 129947 EHLERS INVESTMENT PARTNERS Continued... 94.66 MANAGEMENT FEE 334765 013114 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 94.66 379751 21612014 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 1,962.00 TRANSDUCER 00001524 334691 0051932 -IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,962.00 379762 2/6/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 177.04 ALTERNATOR 334367 69- 126634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.80 TRANSMISSION FLUID 334368 69- 126643 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.06 BRAKE DRUMS 334369 1- 4368285 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 262.68 ROTORS, BRAKE SHOE KIT 334370 69- 126694 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.71 CYLINDER 334692 1- 4368451 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.71 CYLINDER 334693 69- 126740 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.71 GENERATOR 334694 1 -4368146 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 141.59 ROTORS, PADS 334695 69- 126807 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,128.50 379753 21612014 133545 FAMILY HOUSING FUND 2,500.00 HOUSING GAPS ANALYSIS 334371 2014 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 2,500.00 379754 216/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,546.01 METERS 00001521 334372 0066639 -1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 135.70 PLUGS 00001521 334373 0067734 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 2,681.71 379755 2/6/2014 101603 FLAHERTY S HAPPY TYME CO. 147.00 334518 29908 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 365.75 334791 011014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 512.75 379756 21612014 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 205.00 334626 8190 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 205.00 379767 21612014 101475 FOOTJOY 66.36- CREDIT 334496 6990166 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 81.36 SHOES 334592 5351820 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 13.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA AVE Council Check Register by GL 109.33 Council Check Register and Summary 379759 216/2014 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379757 21612014 101475 FOOTJOY 334593 Continued... 379758 2/6/2014 133544 GARNER, PEARLIE 109.33 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334374 4013 KIPLING 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 5511.6406 1646.6610 1470.6188 1553.6556 1553.6406 1553.6556 1553.6556 1553.6406 7411.6406 5842.5513 5662.5513 1552.6406 5919.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page- 9 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA E�LDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION_ GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING AVE 109.33 379759 216/2014 132389 GAZICH, KATHLEEN 26.82 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 334593 122713 26.82 379760 21612014 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 189.30 SAFETY GLASSES 00001508 334696 1019956827 189.30 379761 21612014 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 57.75 R -91 PHONE 334697 5331577 57.75 379762 21612014 101103 GRAINGER 8.79 IMPACT SOCKET 00005955 334375 9342485001 8.53 CALENDAR 00005952 334376 9342005767 85.28 IMPACT SOCKET SET 00005955 334377 9342143428 72.56 IMPACT SOCKET SET 00005955 334378 9342143436 40.41 POSTER FRAME 00005955 334452 9344158085 18.44 WELDING GLOVES 334698 9351521027 234.01 379763 216/2014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 352.50 334519 162640 404.50 334520 162639 757.00 379764 21612014 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 3.80 FUSES 00001561 334699 121065 -1 3.80 379765 21612014 103725 HAMER, STEVE 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334774 020314 64.40 5511.6406 1646.6610 1470.6188 1553.6556 1553.6406 1553.6556 1553.6556 1553.6406 7411.6406 5842.5513 5662.5513 1552.6406 5919.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page- 9 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ARENA E�LDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT.OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION_ GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/612014 — 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379766 2/6/2014 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN Continued... 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334775 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIFE INSURANCE - 99 COBRA INSURANCE CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TAX INCREMENTS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page - . 10 Business Unit TRAINING PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.40 379767 21612014 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 6,100.15 FEB 2014 PREMIUM 334700 6611048 -7 9900.2033.05 9.50 COBRA 334701 212014 1550.6043 6,109.65 379768 21612014 133558 HARTWIG, PAUL 165.01 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334745 5224 BLAKE RD 5900.2015 165.01 379769 21612014 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 334736 33380 1470.6103 2,475.08 379770 21612014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 6,888.09 TIF ADMIN CENTENNIAL LAKES 334594 24- 2014 -1 9232.6103 2,578.18 TIF ADMIN GRANDVIEW 334594 24- 2014 -1 9234.6103 1,790.75 TIF ADMIN SOUTHDALE 334594 24- 2014 -1 9238.6103 11,257.02 379771 216/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 47,198.30 OVER SETTLEMENT TAX PROCEEDS 334595 1203 -14 -1 9232.4009 47,198.30 379772 216/2014 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 101.01 BUFFER PADS 334702 600999495 5720.6511 173.16 SANITIZER, FOAM SOAP 334703 601004193 5720.6406 196.41 WHEELS FOR CABINETS 334704 601007854 5720.6406 470.58 379773 216/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,194.00 334473 685672 5862.5514 1,854.95 334521 685920 5842.5514 900.00 334522 685673 5822.5514 3,948.95 379774 216/2014 124698 HOYE, PAMELA 7.70 ARTWORK SOLD 334417 012714 5101.4413 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 COBRA INSURANCE CUSTOMER REFUND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TAX INCREMENTS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page - . 10 Business Unit TRAINING PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS10D CITY OF EDINA 214/20'14 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379774 21612014 124698 HOYE, PAMELA Continued... 7.70 379775 21612014 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 308.15 334379 608201026 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 308.15 379776 21612014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 354.00 334523 16774 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 420.00 334627 16706 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 795.00 334792 16948 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELL:i.NG 1,569.00 379777 216/2014 133543 INNOVATIVE REAL ESTATE LLC 72.74 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334380 6000 EWING AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 72.74 379778 216/2014 101761 IVERSON, KATHRYN 353.33 CHEMICAL HEALTH COORDINATOR 334596 OCT -DEC 2013 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 353.33 CHEMICAL HEALTH COORDINATOR 334596 OCT -DEC 2013 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 353.34 CHEMICAL HEALTH COORDINATOR 334596 OCT -DEC 2013 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 61.10 EXPENSES 334597 012814 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 61.10 EXPENSES 334597 012814 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 61.09 EXPENSES 334597 012814 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,243.29 379779 21612014 129077 IVERSON, TRAVIS 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334776 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 64.40 379780 21612014 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 812.00 GUARD INSTRUCTOR TRAINING 334705 20065977 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOLADMINISTRATION 412.00 GUARD INSTRUCTOR TRAINING 334706 20066063 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,224.00 379781 21612014 100830 JERRYS PRINTING 123.00 FORESTRY FORMS 334707 63635 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 123.00 379782 21612014 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 3,900.00 WEBSITE MIANTENANCE -APRIL 334598 JJ5284 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descri ption Business Unit 379782 21612014 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. Continued... 850.00 SEO ENHANCEMENTS 334599 JJ5306 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 700.00 WEBSITE FORM BUILDER 334739 JJ5421 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 FORM BUILDER FOR WEBSITE 334740 JJ5420 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,400.00 EXTRANET STAFF DIRECTORY 334749 JJ5343A 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 7,150.00 379783 21612014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 27.65 334474 2120308 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,818.00 334524 2167937 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 641.65 334628 2167946 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 40.00 334629 2167947 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,754.55 334630 2167934 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 57.54- 334631 2167944 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS -SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,835.60 334793 2167945 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,059.91 379784 2/6/2014 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 87.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334708 013114 5720.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 87.95 379786 21612014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 182.70 334475 1767559 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 182.24 334476 1767558 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 286.94 334525 1745663 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 996.66 334526 1771072 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.12 334527 1771051 ' 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,900.82 334528 1771068 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,373.44 334529 1771045 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,581.12 334530 1771069 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.24 334531 1771047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,319.66 334532 1771070 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,049.60 334533 1771071 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,130.95 334534 1771073 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.74 334535 1771074 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6.92- 334536 605662 5842.5512 -COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.63- 334537 605661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.79- 334538 605660 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.76- 334539 606087 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 605.17 334632 1771046. 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 380.26 334633 1771049 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4 /2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary 216/2014 -- 2/612014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379786 21612014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 692.54 334634 1771053 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,373.44 .334635 1771044 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.24 334636 1771052 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,436.78 334637 1771058 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,372.60 334638 1771061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.12 334639 1771062 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 511.95 334640 1771059 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK,SELLING 3,999.58 334641 1771063 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,486.07 334642 1771064 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 62.74 334643 1771066 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,948.92 334644 1771065 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING •28- 334645 588532 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 11.25- 334646 592936 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 614.70 334794 1771048 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 62.74 334795 1771050 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,525.36 334796 1771055 5822.5512 COST.OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,813.97 334797 1771075 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 41,446.78 379787 21612014 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 218.82 PETTY CASH 334757 012914 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 22.45 PETTY CASH 334757 012914 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 38.00 PETTY CASH 334757 012914 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 40.71 PETTY CASH 334757 012914 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES .ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 24.02 PETTY CASH 334757 012914 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 344.00 379788 21612014 131857 JOINT WATER COMMISSION 5,950.00 MPLS WATER RATE REVIEW 334600 1006 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5,950.00 379789 21612014 122802 JULIAN M. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CORP. 2,175.00 TEST PITS SOIL 334381 7296 5550.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SPORTS DOME "ALANCE SHEET 2,175.00 379790 216/2014 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 34.50 BEARINGS 00005916 334709 T156484 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.50 379791 21612014 111018 KEEPRS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/412014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379791 21612014 111018 KEEPRS INC. Continued... 57.28 UNIFORMS 00003736 334711 235899 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.28 379792 21612014 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 18.62 KEYS 334712 S1007237 7410.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 18.62 379793 2!6/2014 102047 KLITZKE, PAUL 125.00 PIANO TUNING 334497 26723 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 125.00 379794 21612014 124707 KNAEBLE, PETER - 596.10 TUITION I TEXTBOOKS 334713 013114 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 596.10 379795 2/612014 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 156.60 JAN 2014 SERVICE 334382 011414 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 DEC 2013 SERVICE 334601 1/1/14 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 324.60 379796 21612014 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 25.00 BOILERS LICENSE RENEWAL FEE 334714 013014 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTP.ATION 25.00 379797 21612014 133562 KRUEGER, WILLIAM KENT 339.03 ART WORK SOLD 334754 013014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 339.03 379798 216/2014 130216 KUEHL, RHONDA 91.00 ART WORK SOLD 334418 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 334419 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 117.00 379799 216/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 307.48 DWI TOWS (2) 334710 013114 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 307.48 379800 21612014 129932 LABOVITZ ANNE 9.42 ART WORK SOLD 334420 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.42 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE CEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379800 21612014 129932 LABOVITZ, ANNE 379801 2/6/2014 121656 LAVEN, JANE 165.10 ART WORK SOLD 334421 012414 5101.4413 165.10 379802 21612014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 22.79 SCREWS 00005886 334383 9302183738 1553.6530 853.46 PLOW BOLTS, NUTS, WASHERS 00005886 334384 9302183465 1553.6530 876.25 379803 21612014 133564 LEGACY CREATIVE IMAGES 400.78 FOUNDERS DAY PHOTO BOOTH 334750 1023 1130.6408 400.78 379804 21612014 133550 LEONARD, MARTHA 59.00 CLASS REFUND 334499 012914 5101.4607 59.00 379805 21612014 103217 LHB PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN 9,932.01 PENTAGON PARK TIF STUDY 334602 130270.00 -4 9232.6136 9,932.01 379806 216/2014 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 160.91 COMPUTER HARD DRIVE 334498 013114 1400.6160 160.91 379807 216/2014 130079 LINK, JOSHUA 62.25 TEXTBOOK 334715 013114 1470.6104 62.25 379808 21612014 100858 LOGIS 544.50 NETWORK SERVICES 334603 37729 1554.6230 544.50 NETWORK SERVICES 334603 37729 1554.6230 396.00 NETWORK SERVICES 334603 37729 47078.6710 24.75 NETWORK SERVICES 334603 37729 5210.6230 97.99 BACKUP SERVER 334604 37806 1554.6710 1,267.19 BACKUP SOFTWARE - 2 LICENSES 334604 37806 1554.6160 34.13 ADMIN CHARGE 334604 37806 1554.6160 1,064.25 PROF SERVICES & RICHFIELD 334605 37828 1554.6103 396.00 NETWORK SERVICES 334605 37828 1400.6160 Subledger Account Description Continued... ART WORK SOLD 2/4/20'14 10:38:08 Page -, 15 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE CEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATI GOLF DOME PROGRAM CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GE. J - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 L Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379808 21612014 100858 LOGIS Continued... 173.25 WIFI PROF SERVICES 334605 37826 4413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY WIFI PROJECT 99.00 FIRE NETWORK SERVICES 334605 37828 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 346.50 NETWORK SERVICES 334606 37860 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 4,988.06 379809 216/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 321.11 STUDS, CLAMPS 00005957 334453 2141194 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.93 HINGE 00005917 334454 2141151 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.87 MIRRORS 00005972 334716 2141333 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.49 BEARING 00005923 334717 2141218 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 820.40 379810 2/612014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 560.00 HOSTING FEES 334385 191 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 560.00 379811 21612014 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,904.00 PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP 334386 JAN 29 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIO;'. CITIZENS 1,904.00 379812 21612014 101483 MENARDS 15.56 BULBS 00001513 334387 47849 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 37.93 PAINT 00008049 334607 42968 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 53.49 379813 21612014 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 142.50 OFFICIATING FEES 334743 4480 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 142.50 379814 21612014 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 365,522.72 SEWER SERVICE 334766 0001030280 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 365,522.72 379815 21612014 100892 MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO. INC. 9.46 ROSSETTES 334767 113499 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 9.46 379816 216/2014 122473 MILLER, CHICHI 74.75 ART WORK SOLD 334422 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 — 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379816 21612014 122473 MILLER, CHICHI Continued... 379817 21612014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 4.88 PLASTIC ELBOW 00005888 334388 0102472 -IN 1553,6530 REPAIR PARTS 4.88 379818 216/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 753.44 2014 BUDGET BOOKS 334389 14751 1160.6575 PRINTING 753.44 379819 216/2014 133548 MID, TESORO 40.95 ART WORK SOLD 334423 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 40.95 379820 216/2014 117420 MOE, MARK 48.75 ARTWORK SOLD 334424 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 48.75 379821 21612014 133325 MOLLOY, KATHLEEN 31.20 ARTWORK SOLD 334425 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 31.20 379822 216/2014 133555 MORRISSEY, SANDY 161.79 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334718 6409 WILLOW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND WOOD RD 161.79 379823 2/6/2014 124121 MULLANEY, MARLA 2.60 ARTWORK SOLD 334426 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2.60 379824 21612014 114343 MULLEN, JANET 59.80 ART WORK SOLD 334427 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 59.80 379825 21612014 132644 NELSON LINDALL, ALICE 24.05 ART WORK SOLD 334429 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 24.05 379826 2/6/2014 130216 NELSON, JONATHAN 16.25 ART WORK SOLD 334428 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page- 17 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FINANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 216/2014 — 216/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379826 2/6/2014 130216 NELSON, JONATHAN Continued... 16.25 379827 216/2014 121125 NEMER, KAREN 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 334430 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 6.50 379828 2/6/2014 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334500 013014 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 100.00 379829 216/2014 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 31.20 ART WORK SOLD 334431 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 31.20 379830 21612014 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 174.82 LAMINATOR, BATTERIES, PAPER 00002086 334719 673167114001 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.82 379831 21612014 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 90.35 ART WORK SOLD 334432 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 90.35 379832 21612014 123786 OLSON, VICKI 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 334433 012414 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9.75 - 379833 21612014 130333 O- MALLEY, MARYANNE 47.45 ART WORK SOLD 334434 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 47.45 379834 21612014 101659 ORKIN COMMERCIAL SERVICES 138.08 FEB SERVICE 334720 90519875 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 138.08 379835 21612014 133554 PAUL J. DONNAY THREE LLC 21.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334721 6137 BROOKVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 139.10 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334722 5716 DREWAVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 160.69 21412014 10:38:08 Page - 18 J ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT, GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL GENERAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/20;4 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379836 2/6/2014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS Continued... 1,024.32 334477 8434717 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 165.25 334478 8434612 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,454.90 334540 8434709 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 465.22 334541 8434713 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 165.25 334542 8434611 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 165.25 334543 8434610 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 3,440.19 379837 21612014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 559.96 334390 18609672 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 150.30 334723 18609662 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINIJOR000H CONCESSIONS 710.28 379838 21612014 130228 PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC. 475.00 EDITION EDINA DESIGN 334455 012114 -21 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 475.00 379839 21612014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,736.96 334479 2550250 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 50.77- 334480 3519762 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 268.31 334544 2552654 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,694.40 334545 2550249 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 547.33 334546 2552655 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,019.20 _ 334547 2552645 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,312.02 334548 2552653 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 856.66 334647 2552650 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 109.12 334648 2552644 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,604.42 334649 2552649 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,244.11 334650 2552651 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,074.72 334651 2552652 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK FELLING 748.17 334652 2552643 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 254.61 334653 2552647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.00- 334654 3516804 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300.58 334798 2552646 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 8.83- 334799 3520278 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,699.01 379840 21612014 100119 PING 530.72 IRONS SET 334501 12099589 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP. RETAIL SALES 530.72 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379840 216/2014 100119 PING Continued... 379841 21612014 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 281.60 334800 20357 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 281.60 379842 21612014 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,376.75 PLANT MAINTENANCE 334725 321323 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 2,376.75 379843 2/6/2014 101138 PLEAA 210.00 ANNUAL DUES (6) 334724 2014 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 210.00 379844 21612014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,419.12 TIRES 00005834 334726 210101839 1553.6583 TIRES &TUBES 1,419.12 379845 21612014 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 112.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334768 020314 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334777 020414 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 177.35 379846 21612014 100380 PRESTRUD, ROBERT 335.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334391 012714 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 143.99 SAFETY BOOTS 334392 012614 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 478.99 379847 21612014 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 255.00 LAP CLOCK PARTS 334727 266292 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 255.00 379848 2/6/2014 132840 RIVAMONTE, CARLISA 11.05 ART WORK SOLD 334747 012214 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 11.05 379849 2/6/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 156.50 BUSINESS CARDS 334502 79843 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 164.44 WIINDOW ENVELOPES 334769 79754 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 320.94 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page - 20 Business Unit YORK SELLING EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS POLICE,DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION TRAINING BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH- OPERATIONS ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERA! R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4120-.4 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379850 21612014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. Continued... 633.80 SOFTENER SALT 334393 00294578 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 633.80 379851 216/2014 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 537.50 334549 14 -10342 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.50 334550 14 -10327 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 56TH ST SELLING 635.00 379852 216/2014 129282 ROSENBAUER MINNESOTA LLC 240.54 DOOR LATCH 00005906 334394' 0000011349 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 240.54 379853 21612014 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 28.60 ARTWORK SOLD 334435 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.60 379854 2/6/2014 133563 SCHMITH, MARY JO 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 334755 013014 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 65.98 ART WORK SOLD 334755 013014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 365,98 379855 2/612014 130788 SEDGWICK HEATING & A/C 48.75 PERMIT REFUND 334395 ED128598 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS .I 48.75 379856 21612014 100995 SEH 1,142.44 RICHMOND HILLS ROADWAY PROJ 334608 277587 04387.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RICHMOND HILLS PK 1,142.44 379857 216/2014 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 249.01 POTTERY SUPPLIES 334756 013014 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ULDG /MAINT 249.01 379858 2/612014 127519 SIEGEL, LISA 63.58 ARTWORK SOLD 334436 012714 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 63.58 379859 21612014 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 403.67 2014 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 334456 76745128 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 403.67 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 216/2014 105152 SPAIN, MARK . PW CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 92.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334770 Council Check Register by GL 1646.6201 Page - 22 92.99 Council Check Register and Summary 379863 2/612014 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Businers Unit 379859 216/2014 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 379864 216/2014 Continued... 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 379860 2/6/2014 131946 SIMPSON, CANDICE 170.00 334556 2506 5822.5514 4.88 ARTWORK SOLD 334437 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5842.5514 4.88 550.00 379861 21612014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 373.35 3,854.79 334457 334481 1125822 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 373.35 1,596.00 334482 1124834 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 117657, STORE TO DOOR 2,450.00 334483 1124833 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 334503 01130591 353.00 334484 1123610 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,394.14 334485 1125823 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,503.99 334551 1125821 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING : 703.25 334552 1125818 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,215.26 334553 1125817 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING '.. 3,895.81 334554 1125819 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,400.00- 334555 9026631 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 185.00 334655 1127043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 379862 216/2014 105152 SPAIN, MARK . PW 92.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334770 012814 1646.6201 92.99 379863 2/612014 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 88.40 ART WORK SOLD 334438 012414 5101.4413 88.40 379864 216/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 170.00 334556 2506 5822.5514 380.00 334557 2551 5842.5514 550.00 379865 21612014 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 373.35 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER 00005923 334457 29506 1553.6530 373.35 379866 216/2014 117657, STORE TO DOOR 11,700.00 2014 SERVICES 334503 01130591 1504.6103 11,700.00 LAUNDRY BUILDING IVWNTENANCE ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 — 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379867 21612014 101015 STREICHERS Continued... 845.00 BALL. VEST, SHIRT CARRIER 334504 11068364 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1400.6203 5101.4413 5862.5514 1,590.00 FITNESS TRAINING 845.00 EFD_JAN2014 1470.6104 1,590.00 379868 2/6/2014 122365 SUTPHEN, CHRISTINE 379875 2/6/2014 101474 TITLEIST 104.00 ART WORK SOLD 334439 012714 2207471 5440.5511 104.00 MERCHANDISE 334611 2210654 379869 216/2014 133553 TACTICAL SOLUTIONS 379876 216/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 40,860.00 DRAGON EYE SPEED LIDAR 00003013 334615 4158 334558 40,860.00 5842.5513 651.60 379870 21612014 104932 TAYLOR MADE 278.35 GOLF CLUBS 334609 21399685 278.35 379871 2/6/2014 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 144.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334396 012814 144.98 379872 2/612014 102227 THOMPSON, PAUL 42.25 ART WORK SOLD 334440 012414 42.25 379873 21612014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,444.55 334656 802234 2,444.55 379874 21612014 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1400.6203 5101.4413 5862.5514 1,590.00 FITNESS TRAINING 334728 EFD_JAN2014 1470.6104 1,590.00 379875 2/6/2014 101474 TITLEIST 102.00 MERCHANDISE 334610 2207471 5440.5511 128.00 MERCHANDISE 334611 2210654 5440.5511 230.00 379876 216/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 651.60 334558 909382 5842.5513 651.60 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING FIRE CREPT. GENERAL PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379877 21612014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Continued... 141.96 WELDING RODS 00005914 334397 10007918 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT UPI_RATION GEN 141.96 379878 21612014 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 535.13 DOOR REPAIRS 334458 626089 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 535.13 379879 21612014 103048 U.S. BANK 798.75 HSA MAINTENANCE FEE 334741 8560030 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 798.75 379880 21612014 100050 USPS 1,000.00 TMS- 202739 334505 013014 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 379881 21612014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 63.12 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 334729 298439 -01 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 22.20- CREDIT 334730 299138CM 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 40.92 379882 21612014 103252 VEAP 25,000.00 2014 RESIDENT SERVICES 334413 2014 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 25,000.00 379883 216/2014 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 22.11 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.11 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 22.12 RECYCLE FLUORESCENT LIGHTS 334751 EW597134 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 176.94 379884 21612014 119464 VINOCOPIA 290.00 334559 0091649 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 290.00 379885 21612014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 214/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379885 2/612014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 83.16 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334612 38197423 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 110.85 CONCESSION PRODUCT 334613 38457347 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 194.01 379886 21612014 121611 VONBARGEN,AMY 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 334441 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 379887 216/2014 101932 VOTH, BART 64.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 334778 020314 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 64.40 379888 21612014 129142 WALLY'S SERVICE STATION INC. 33.82 NON - OXYGEN GAS 00003576 334731 012514 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 33.82 379889 21612014 133551 WEISS,AMY 375.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 334506 4515 MOORLAND 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 375.00 379890 21612014 131421 WILLEMS, MATTHEW 167.32 MEALS AT NFA 334732 013114 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.32 379891 216/2014 132064 WINDFELDT, STEPHANIE 390.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME AD 334507 012914 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 390.00 379892 216/2014 133549 WINDLER, STEPHANIE 182.00 ART WORK SOLD 334442 012714 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 182.00 379893 21612014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,871.10 334486 352116 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 766.85 334560 351985 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 910.85 334561 351981 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,548.80 379894 216/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 62.53 334562 489697 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4/2014 10:38:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business; Unit 379894 216/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... - ~- 1,229.82 334563 489698 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 260.24- 334564 63870 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 62.53 334657 489695 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 162.24 334658 489693 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,810.93 334659 489696 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,092.54 334660 489692 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,160.35 379895 216/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 134.58 334487 1080137875 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,278.27 334488 1080137874 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,355.58 334489 1080137733 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLIN3 45.00- 334490 2080027937 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.00- 334491 2080027984 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 284.04- 334492 2080027961 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING' 2,491.22 334565 1080137876 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,963.40 334566 1080137877 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,418.72 334567 1080137879 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,365.14 334568 1080137878 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 137.12 334569 1080137881 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK WELLING 8.67- 334570 2080027993 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TWST SEL'i.ING 94.06- 334571 2080027995 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING '• 226.17- 334572 2080030032 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.15- 334573 2080029910 5842.5512 _COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 174.39- 334574 2080026827 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 101.90- 334575 2080026944 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12.77- 334576 2080026256 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 160.15- 334577 2080026097 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 119.15- 334578 2080026103 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING' 28,729.58 379896 21612014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 2,224.00 334493 1090173191 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 295.20 334585 1090173193 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,138.90 334586 1090173192 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,794.75 334661 1090175291 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,205.33 334801 1090175294 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 379897 2/612014 132645 WOOD, REBECCA R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount 379897 216/2014 2.60 2.60 379898 21612014 18,208.25 18,208.25 Supplier/ Explanation PO # 132645 WOOD, REBECCA ART WORK SOLD 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2013 MS4 PROGRAM ASSISTANCE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 - 2/6/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 334443 012714 5101.4413 334742 5- 02092 -650 5960.6103 Subledger Account Description Continued... ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/412014 10:38:08 Page - 27 Business Unit . ART CENTER REVENUES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 379900 21612014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 40.25 51- 0010118404 -0 334398 398958923 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 805.67 51- 0010166207 -2 334399 398966071 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.06 51- 0160483 -1 334400 398822031 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 60.32 51- 4420190 -3 334401 398576058 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 74.57 51- 9770164 -7 334402 398956764 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 48.84 51- 8997917 -7 334403 398944955 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 41.84 51- 6692497 -0 334404 398920085 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 42.46 51- 0194596 -8 334405 398821847 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 50.32 51- 0223133 -2 334406 398821950 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1.05 51- 6541084 -2 334407 398918234 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1.16 51- 6050184 -2 334408 398909881 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS ' 1,124.68 51- 5107681 -4 334459 399057856 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 1,665.60 51- 5547446 -1 334460 399065157 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 3,795.29 51- 6644819 -9 334461 399081769 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINSOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,520.79 51- 0010060454 -7 334462 399138370 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 36.07 51- 0010103585 -7 334463 399130346 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 17.74 51- 9011854 -4 334464 399116152 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 93.34 51- 9608462 -5 334465 399126507 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 43.21 51- 0193479 -4 334466 398976672 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 35.03 51- 8976004 -9 334467 399114674 -1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 171.97 51- 8987646 -8 334468 399115102 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.73 51- 9770163 -6 334469 399125329 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 912.87 51- 9251919 -0 334616 399293108 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 11.06 51- 8102668 -0 334617 399273913 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34,572.93 51- 4621797 -2 334618 399225655 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,039.34 51- 4159265 -8 334733 399041725 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 49,264.19 379901 21612014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 207.25 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 334508 54060480 5210.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 207.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount 379902 21612014 144.45 439.39 583.84 966,035.00 Supplier/ Explanation 101091 ZIEGLER INC LAMP EQUIPMENT REPAIRS Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/6/2014 -- 2/6/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00005971 334734 PC001535160 1553.6530 00005963 334735 SW000177238 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description Continued... REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 966,035.00 Total Payments 966,035:00 2/412014 10:38:08 Page - 28 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/4 /2014 10:38:14 Council Check Summary Page- 1 216/2014 - 2/6/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 182,679.18 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 307.48 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 2,616.25 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 7,785.34 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 40,860.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,017.89 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,277.86 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,224.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,425.20 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 13,356.59 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 2,175.00 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 10,119.21 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,286.05 05800 LIQUOR FUND 173,596.84 05900 UTILITY FUND 383,561.60 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 51,688.40 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 6,150.63 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 65,438.40 09234 GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT 2,578.18 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 1,790.75 09900 PAYROLL FUND 6,100.15 Report Totals 966,035.00 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polices nd proceduresAa�e %��' �`� R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/9112014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 2113/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ ExplanaUon PO # Doc No-- Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379903 2/1312014 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 26.48 HANDLE FOR VALVE 00001538 334877 0138740 -IN , 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 26.48 379904 21312014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL INC. 2,753.75 JAN 2014 SERVICE 335381 6266157 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,753.75 379906 2/1312014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 131.60 334933 1760166 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS, SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 91.60 335207 1761562 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 73.20 335425 1761563 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 296.40 379906 2/1312014 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 102.21 PEST CONTROL 335382 856507 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 102.21 379907 2/13/2014 100576 ALL SAFE INC. 402.85 EMERGENCY BATTERIES 335283 126683 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.20 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335331 126800 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 449.05 379908 2113/2014 133614 AMBURG INC. 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -5912 YORK AVE 335276 ED128077REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379909 2/13/2014 103286 AMEM 100.00 TOM SCHMITZ 335284 2014 DUES 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 DARRELLTODD 335284 2014 DUES 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 379910 2113/2014 127366 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 610.60 SLACKADJUSTER KITS 334878 AFS- 240340049 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 610.60 379911 2/13/2014 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 269.38 334879 013114 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 615.73 334879 013114 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.86 334879 013114 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.13 334879 013114 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2113/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379911 211312014 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES Continued... 148.52 334879 013114 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 213.90 334879 013114 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 68.61 334879 013114 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 1,517.13 379912.2113/2014 100666 AMSAN _ 6.67 TILEX SOAP SCUM REMOVER 00001489 335383 303896674 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.67 379913 2113/2014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 78.66 PAPER 335332 10388135 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 196.58 PAPER 335332 10388135 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 117.99 PAPER 335332 10388135 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 393.23 379914 2/1312014 133624 ANDERSON, JEFF & JODI 80.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335384 5845 KELLOGG 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 80.00 379916 •2113/2014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 98.21 COFFEE 335285 1107558 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 98.21 379916 - 2/1312014 133626 ARIZON COMPANIES 2,790.00 AIRLOCK COVER 00001899 335385 0000005805 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,790.00 379917 2113/2014 114476 ' ARMOR SECURITY INC. 140.00 REPLACE SMOKE DETECTOR 335386 176668 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 140.00 379918 2/1312014 132031' ARTISAN BEER,COMPANY 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page- 2 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,298.00 334934 40842 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING ssa -nn 334935 40640 335208 40841 379919 211312014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 262.59 TRASH REMOVAL 335286 FEB2014 5842.5514 COST, OF GOODS;SOLD BEER' YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER .50TH ST SELLING 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUP- R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014.14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379919 2/1312014 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS Continued... 262.59 379920 2113/2014 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 923.95 COACHING 335333 AE1028 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 1,726.35 COACHING 335465 AE1029 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 2,650.30 379921 2/1312014 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 139.55 335426 41719100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 19.56 335427 69733900 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 475.65 335428 41718900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS,SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 89.55 335429 41719200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 194.05 335430 41718700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 123.55 335431 41719000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 161.48 335432 89733800 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,203.39 379922 2113/2014 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,170.00 SNOW REMOVAL 335287 142313 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,170.00 379923 2113/2014 133609 BENSON, GREG 1,420.98 OVERPAID ACCIDENT CLAIM 335288 EYN9873 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,420.98 379924 2/1312014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. '216.00 PIZZA 335334 D28IN1689 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 216.00 379926 2/13/2014 125139 BERNICK'S 241.20 335209 111164 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 311.00 335210 111186 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 128.70 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335335 111190 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 57.22 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335336 109622 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 40.00 335433 111183 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 776.12 379926 2113/2014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 344.40 COFFEE 335337 1149223 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 15.00 WATER 335338 1149786 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2111/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379926 2/1312014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 95.95 TEA 335339 1150415 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 455.35 379927 2/1312014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 24.14 FILE FOLDERS 334802 WO- 910414 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 16.95 BINDER 334803 WO- 906786-1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL -33.07 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334804 WO- 905908 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 32.50- RETURN 334805 CP- WO- 905787 -1 1600.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 4.22 CLIPS' 334806 OE- 344973 -1 1140.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES PLANNING- 3.75 LABELS 334807 OE- 343434 -1 1260.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 30.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334860 WO- 910980 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 18.90 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334880 WO- 910980 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 160.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334881 WO- 910024 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 55.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334881 WO- 910024 -1 1160.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FINANCE 67:16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334882 WO- 907381 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 307.39 SHREDDER 334882 WO- 907381 -1 5902.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 59.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334883 WO- 905048 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 11.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334883 WO- 905048 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 81.35 CUSTOM STAMP 334684 IN -27783 1120.6406 _.GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 80.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334885 WO- 905867 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 23.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334885 WO- 905867 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 48.82 PACKAGING TAPE 334886 WO- 909139 -1 1550.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 119.37 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334687 W0408898 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 64.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334888 WO- 909179 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 56.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334889 WO- 909888 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 38.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 334890 OE- 343039 -1 1626.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 53.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335289 WO- 911519 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,325.85 378928 211312014 106477 BESSESEN, LAUREL 110.01 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335290 5120 MIRROR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LAKES DR 110.01 379929 2/13/2014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 79.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335291 94489 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 79.99 379930 211312014 104594 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 214.55 TOWING 335340 154388 5761.61 B0 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379930 2/1312014 104694 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 214.55 379931 2/13/2014 131494 BONNER & LEACH LLP 18,739.82 JAN 2014 FEES 335387 013114 1195.6103 18,739.82 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 379932 2113/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 238.50 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 334936 117867 808.50 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 334937 117759 220.50 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 335434 117957 181.50 335435 117958 1,449.00 379933 2113/2014 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 4,532.23 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005959 334808 187403 4,596.48 ENGINE MODULES 00005961 334809 187535 677.90 MIRROR 00005890 334891 819644 43.60 UJOINT KIT 00005893 334892 821626 43.60 UJOINT KIT 00005894 334893 821824 68.15 WIPER ARM 00005930 334894 822110 111.32 FILTERS 00005827 335466 806265X1 220.89 VALVES 00005804 335467 805756X1 10,294.17 379934 2113/2014 133187 BRANDL HOMES Subledger Account Description - Continued... PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -5816 OAKLAWN AVE 335277 ED127866REFUND 1495.4109 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -3412 60TH ST W 335278 ED127801REUFND 1495.4109 5,000.00 379936 2/13/2014 133616 BRAUER, PETER 44.49 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335292 6328 WILRYAN 5900.2015 AVE 44.49 379936 211312014 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 167.75 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 334810 381524 01246.1705.21 167.75 379937 2/1312014 103279 BRETSON, GREG 60.34 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 335293 020514 7411.6215 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT CUSTOMER REFUND 2111/2014 14:37:50 Page - 5 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES 50TH-ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONSULTING INSPECTION OLD PW BLDG DEMOLITION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2111/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 2113/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379937 2/1312014 103279 BRETSON, GREG Continued... 60.34 379938 2113/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 9,843.75 RANGE BALLS 335388 924938167 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 552.60- CREDIT 335468 , 924816495 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,314.00- CREDIT 335469 924818180 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 6,977.15 379939 2/1312014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 6,740.85 334938 429783 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 734.20 335211 429784 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,475.05 379940 2/13/2014 100677 CARGILL INC. 1,716.49 ROAD SALT 00005071 334811 2901540254 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,716.49 379941 ' 2/13/2014 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 150.00 CPR INSTRUCTION 335294 00534764. 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 15D.00 379942 2113/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 19.26 952 929 -0297 334812 0297 -1/14 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 344.25 952 927 -8861 334813 8861 -1/14 1554.6180 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 30.91 952826 -7398 335295 7398 -1/14 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 31.07 952 941 -1019 335296 1019 -1/14 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY, 433.49 379943 2/1312014 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 275.99 SAFETY BOOTS 334814 S11455 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 121.49 SAFETY BOOTS 334614 S11455 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 334814 S11455. 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275.99 SAFETY BOOTS 334814 S11455 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 300.00 SAFETY BOOTS 334814 S11455 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 1,123.47 379944 2/13/2014 106693 CITYSPRINT 14.75 COURIER SERVICE 335297 30966 1190.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSING 47.11 COURIER SERVICE 335297 30966 1100.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY COUNCIL 61.86 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 379944 2113/2014 106893 CITYSPRINT Continued... 379946 2/1312014 120433 COMCAST 68.72 8772 10 614 0177449 335298 177449-1/14 8.83 8772 10 614 0161120 335341 161120 -1/14 90.85 8772 10 614 0164959 335389 164959 -1/14 168.40 379946 2/1312014 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 866.20 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 335342 013114 866.20 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 335342 013114 866.20 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 335342 013114 2,598.60 379947 2/13/2014 100613 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 258.00 PARKING RAMP CLEANING 334895 7070198969 258.00 379948 2/1312014 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 756.29 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 335390 100 -19432 756.29 379949 2/1312014 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 3,422.23 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00001533 334815 10386 3,422.23 379960 211312014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 726.88 HOT WATER HEATER REPAIRS 335343 2612692 1,504.00 QUARTERLY MAINT CONTRACT 335391 81655 2,230.88 379961 2/13/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 5,952.70 334939 738117 44.80 334940 738118 2,481.90 334941 738114 66.30 334942 738113 22.40 335212 738116 1;559.20 335213 738115 10,127.30 379962 2/1312014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 5420.6188 5511.6188 5430.6188 5822.6122 5842.6122 5862.6122 1375.6103 5710.6230 5913.6103 5511.6180 5710.6230 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5822.5515 5822.5514 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 7 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS . RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PARKING RAMP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 133610 DOHERTY, JERRY CITY OF EDINA 64.00 CLASS REFUND 335300 020514 Council Check Register by GL CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 64.00 , Council Check Register and Summary 379968 211312014 2113/2014 - 2!13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379952 2/13/2014 1553.6238 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,508.70 253.59 IMPACT WRENCH 00005838 335299 866153 1301.6406 253.59 128.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 379953 2113/2014 5822.6122 104314 DEPOSITORY TRUST & CLEARING CORP., THE 126.34.'_ EDINA LIQUOR AD 334816 68728 962.00 CONFIRMATION FEE 335392 FILE#4239 1500.6103 334816 68728 962.00 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 111.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 379954 2/1312014 5822.6122 132610 DERING PIERSON GROUP 50TH ST SELLING 111.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334817 68743 30,120.01 APPLICATION NO. 6 334896 110 47078.6710 334817 68743 30,120.01 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 385.00 AQUATIC CENTER AD 379965 .211312014 5310.6122 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,105.00 . 89.41 651972955 335344 651972955 -1/14 5760.6122 1,455.21 11D311893 335393 110311893 -1/14 5410.6122 1,544.62 379966 211312014 129167 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 73.60 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335301 6224-01 5822.6406 73.60 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335301 6224 -01 5842.6406 73.60 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335301 6224 -01 5862.6406 220.80 2111/2014 14:37:50 Page - 8 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COUNTRYSIDE PK PLAYGROUND &PATI - ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 379957- 2/1312014 133610 DOHERTY, JERRY 64.00 CLASS REFUND 335300 020514 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 64.00 , 379968 211312014 129080 DUBOIS CHEMICALS INC. 3,508.70 CAR WASH / WAX FLUID 00005964 334897 IN- 1224868 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,508.70 379959 2/13/2014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 128.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334816 68728 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 126.34.'_ EDINA LIQUOR AD 334816 68728 5842.6122 ADVERTISING'OTHER YORK SELLING 128.32 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334816 68728 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 111.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334817 68743 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 111.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334817 68743 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 111.66 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334817 68743 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 385.00 AQUATIC CENTER AD 335394 68729 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,105.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date _ Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379960 2/13/2014 114277 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE Continued... 138.57 DISHWASHER REPAIRS 334818 W85324A 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 138.57 r 379961 2/13/2014 103594 EDINALARM INC. 343.07 MONITORING SERVICE 335302 86069 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 343.07 MONITORING SERVICE 335303 86076 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 686.14 379962 211312014 100049 EHLERS 2,390.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 334898 64583 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 2,000.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 334899 64587 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 4,390.00 379963 211312014 101627 ELASKY, JEFF 515.86 FBI TRAINING EXPENSES 335395 021014 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 515.86 379964 2/1312014 133616 EMERALD HOMES 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -6005 BEARD AVE 335279 ED127806REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 379966 211312014 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 2,990.47 E-83 REPAIRS 334819 72149 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 971.53 E-82 REPAIRS 334820 72148 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,962.00 379966 2/1312014 133666 . EMERGENCY RESPONSE SOLUTIONS 6,247.02 FIRE HOSE 00003724 334821 1474 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,247.02 379967 211312014 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 3,025.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 335304 020614 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 322.98 BOOTS, SHOES 335304 020614 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,347.98 379968 2113/2014 100018 EXPERT T BILLING - 5,803.50 JAN 2014 BILLS 335305 1184 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,803.50 379969 2/1312014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379969 2/1312014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 68.51 BATTERY 334822 1- Z00245 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 68.51 379970 2/1312014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,184.68 PIPE FITTINGS 00001526 334823 0068052 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 292.26 METER HORNS 00001526 334824 0066174 -1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,476.94 379971 2113/2014 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 335306 2461918 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 379972 2/13/2014 119211 FIRSTLAB 330.00 DRUG TESTING 334825 00732920 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 330.00 379973 2/13/2014 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 602,00 335436 020714 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 602.00 379974 2/13/2014 102727 FORCE AMERICA 2,838.02 HYDRAULIC PUMP 00005960 334826 01419595 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 897.76 SPINNER MOTORS 00005889 334827 01419756 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,735.78 379976 2/1312014 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC CO. INC. 22.49 CARBURETOR KIT 000D6088 334828 72358300 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 22.49 379976 2/1312014 103039, FREY, MICHAEL 125.00, MUSICAL ENTERTAINMENT 335345 020614 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 125.00 379977 2/1312014 100764 G & K SERVICES 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 334829 1006898470 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 334830 1006121221 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 30.00 379978 211312014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 309:00 COMPRESSOR REPAIRS 335346 43801 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE V R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 211312014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 379978 2113/2014 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION $ MFG INC 1,818.26 MOTOR, SEAL KIT 335347 43929 5521.6180 427.00- CREDIT 335348 43927 5521.6180 530.24 COMPRESSOR BELTS 335470 43510 5521.6406 2,230.50 379979 2/13/2014 128266 GILMOUR, CHAD 10D.00 BTB GRAPHICS 335349 1023 1130.6103 100.00 379980 2/13/2014 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 381.20 JAN 2014 SERVICE 00001537 334900 92290 5913.6103 381.20 379981 2/1312014 101103 GRAINGER 97.34 FOLDING TABLE 00006364 334831 9341617547 5210.6406 394.28 PIPE CUTTER, HOSE 00005966 334832 9349432857 1553.6530 42.46 'CORRECTION TAPE, DUST REMOVRM005843 334833 9351536306 1553.6406 22.66 PENS - 00005843 334834 9352823109 1553.6406 152.69 WORKSHOP EQUIPMENT 335307 9357636035 7411.6406 1,229.86 MILLERMATIC 335308 9357636027 7411.6406 386.16 BENCH GRINDER, VISE 335309 9346719967 7411.6406 888.51 SHELVING 335310 9353384648 7412.6406 176.38- FREIGHT ADJUSTMENT 335311 9353780316 7412.6406 3,037.78 379982 211312014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,601.75 334943 162813 5842.5513 582.75 335214 162903 5862.5513 2,395.50 335215 162900 5822.5513 5,580.00 379983 211312014 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 128.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 335350 020414 5840.6107 128.24 379984 2/13/2014 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -12 COOPER AVE 335396 REFUND 1495.4109 2,500.00 379986 2/13/2014 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. Subledger Account Description Continued... CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERALSUPPLIES 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 11 Business Unit ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT ARENA ICE MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERALSUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF RANGE PSTF RANGE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2111/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register and.Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379986 2/13/2014 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. Continued... 82.35 REPAIR PARTS 00001492 335351 BLM0165138 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 217.44 TRAP FAN 00001514 335352 BLM0165412 5861.6530 REPAIR PARTS VERNON OCCUPANCY 299.79 379986 2/13/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,858.38 FEB 2014 PREMIUM 334901 6620515-4 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 3,858.38 379987 2/1312014 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 420.00 SOFTBALL BATS 335471 020414 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 249.25 SENIOR SOFTBALL TEAM FEE 335472 020514 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 669.25. 379988 2/1312014 133626 HARTZ, THERESE 80.03 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335397 4433 DUNHAM 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 80.03 379989. 21312014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,823.43 CHEMICALS 00001250 334835 3558573 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,823.43 379990 2/13/2014 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 12,536.34 FEB 2014 PREMIUM 334836 45684690 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,051.06 COBRA 334837 45666094 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 13,587.40 379991 .2113/2014 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 167.52 BEEF PATTIES 335312 024989 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 167.52 379992 2/13/2014 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 144.62 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 335473 148495 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS .50 ACCOUNT EXPENSE CHARGE 335474 AEC JAN2014 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 145.12 379993 2/13/2014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 751.49 BOOKING FEES -JAN 2014 335396 1000038969 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 751.49 379994 2/13/20, 4A 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2111/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No. - . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 379994 2/1312014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 1,874.12 334944 686744 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,249.01 334945 686980 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. YORK SELLING 1,624.50 335216 686745 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER. 50TH ST SELLING 5,747.63 379996 2/13/2014 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 198.10 SENIOR CENTER BROCHURES 334902 32786 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 198.10 379996 2/1312014 132938 HOT DISH ADVERTISING LLC 241.67 LIQUOR STORE BRANDING 335475 21428 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 241.67 LIQUOR STORE BRANDING 335475 21428 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 241.66 LIQUOR STORE BRANDING 335475 21428 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 725.00 379997 2/13/2014 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 224.68 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 335399 020414 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 224.68 379998 2113/2014 130873 HUSNIK, MATT 186.45 UNIFIORM PURCHASE 335400 020714 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 186.45 379999 2/1312014 130160 IDC AUTOMATIC 941.18 OVERHAED DOOR MAINTENANCE 334838 D270755 -IN 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 941.18 380000 2/13/2014 129369 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 100.00 MEMBERSHIP, WORKSHOP 335401 J. NIKUNEN 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 100.00 380001 2113/2014 129636 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 3,250.00 WEBSITE MAINT- DEC 2013 335476 JJ5389 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 3,250.00 380002 2/13/2014 102146 JESSEN PRESS 299.00 CITY NOTECARDS 334839 40887 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 25.00 EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION CARDS 334839 40887 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 134.00 ANNUAL MEETING INVITES 335313 40927 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 458.00 R55CKR2. LOGIS100 CITY'OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14' Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2113/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No . Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380002 211312014 102146 JESSEN PRESS Continued... 380003 2/1312014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,117.85 335217 2167970 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON.SELLING 122.21- 335218 2167984 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,927.60 335219 2167985 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,731.30 335220 2167973 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 57.55 335221 2167974 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING, 40.00 335437 2167971 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 12,752.09 380004 2/13/2014 123661 JMS CUSTOM HOMES LLC 75.04 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335314 7116 SHANNON DR 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 75.04 380006 2/1312014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3,559.92 334946 1771067 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 50.60 334947 1771629 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.04 334948 1772460 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.33- 334949 606914 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 32.00- 334950 606913 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,811.86 335222 1776209 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,648.35 335223 1776205 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.24 335224 1776197 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,145.57 335225 1776203 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,142.32 335226 1776204 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 526.16 335227 1776210 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6,637.52 335228 1776208 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,774.88 335229 1776206 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 127.23 335230 1776207 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,445.62 335231 1776213 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,750.66 335232 1776216 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,556.01 335233 1776211 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266.01 335234 1776212 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 348.23 335235 1776214 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 531.62 335236 1776217 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 210.24 335438 1777549 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .791.47 335439 1776195 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,188.59 335440 1776200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 122.12 335441 1776199 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 335.75 335442 1776198 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380006 2/1312014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 1,212.32 335443 '1776196 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 575.16 335444 1776194 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 110.21 335445 1772732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,879.87 335446 1776215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7.84- 335447 599182 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.73- 335448 606915 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING . 4.83- 335449 606917 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 43,775.84 380007 2113/2014 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 160.11 HEATER PARTS 00001517 334903 037837 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES 160.11 380008 2/1312014 100563 KEEHR, GREGORY - 50.00 MEETING EXPENSES 335478 REIMBURSE 5820.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 50TH STREET GENERAL 88.34 MEETING EXPENSES 335478 REIMBURSE 5840.6106 MEETING EXPENSE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 138.34 380009 2/13/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 55.99 UNIFORMS 00003736. 335315 236641 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 329.95 UNIFORMS 00003737 335316 236082 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 385.94 380010 211312014 118466 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 59.82 PETTY CASH 335353 020614 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 13.94 PETTY CASH 335353 020614 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 20.98 PETTY CASH 335353 020614 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING7- 104.78 PETTY CASH 335353 020614 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 199.52 380011 2/1312014 122616 KOPLOS, GERALD 53.64 HOLSTERS FOR INTRO CLASS 335317 020514 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 53.64 380012 2/13/2014 131966 KOTHRADE SEWER WATER & EXCAVATING 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5804 YORK AVE S 335280 ED126504REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 380013 2/13/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 167.00 TOWING 335479 71723 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380013 2/13/2014 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS Continued... 167.00 380014 2/13/2014 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 334.29 BOBCAT BLOWER PARTS 00002089 335354 01 -90279 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 334.29 380016 2/13/2014 133060 LARSON; CINDY 41.81 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 335480 020314 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 41.81 380016 2/13/2014 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 1,154.89 NUTS, BOLTS, FITTINGS 00005841 334904 9302204047 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,154.89 380017 2/13/2014 116399 L'HEUREUX, ADAM 72.27 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335402 021014 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 72.27 380018 2113/2014 106726 LINDMAN,.DAVID 305.23 SUPPLIES REIBURSEMENT 335403 021014 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 305.23 380019 2/13/2014 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,821.45 TRANSMISSION FLUID 00005962 334840 2323321 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,821.45 380021 2/13/2014 130165 MACDON ELL, STEPHEN 162.00 MODEL 335355 020714 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 162.00 380022 2/13/2014 130484 MARK'S CONCESSION REPAIR LLC 45.81 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 335481 1166BALDUE 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA CONCESSIONS 45.81 380023 2/13/2014 100869 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 2,700.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 335356 8913 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 2,700.00 380024 2/13/2014 130020 MCCD 5,000.00 OPEN TO BUSINESS CONSULTING 334905 2014 PROGRAM 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL— 'STRICT R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 380024 2/13/2014 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 130020 MCCD 5,000.00 22383 380026 2113/2014 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 103944 MED COMPASS 826.00 HEARING TESTING 1260.6103 101.50 HEARING TESTING 29.00 HEARING TESTING 5410.6103 87.00 HEARING TESTING 29.00 HEARING TESTING 5511.6136 43.50 HEARING TESTING 58.00 HEARING TESTING 5710.6103 87.00 HEARING TESTING 1,261.00 22383 380026 2113/2014 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 101483 MENARDS 19.75 WHEEL 5910.6103 65.40 PAINT, SUPPLIES 00006092 99.99 SERVICE CART 5422.6406 3.99 DOOR STOP 00006093 15.18 FUSES 5420.6530 21.78 PUTTY KNIFE, PRIMER 00001518 226.09 48134 380027 2113/2014 TOOLS 100886 METRO SALES INC 00001560 663.69 COPIER USAGE - ADMIN 5841.6406 54.51 COPIER USAGE: PW 00001573 2,406.83 COPIER USAGE - METRO RICOH 5914.6530 220.16 COPIER USAGE - PW 00008060 1,296.94 ADMIN RICOH 5511.6406 4,642.13 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 2/13/2014 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page- 17 Business Unit 335483 574000 335484 574025 335485 574014 335486 574194 335487 11118A 380028 2113/2014 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335404 4456 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335405 4472 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335406 4491 513.00 380029 2113/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE , 173.70 REPAIR KEY REMOTE 334845 234826 173.70 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1621.6103 1621.6103 1621.6103 1553.6180 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 335482 22383 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 335482 22383 1400.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 335482 22383 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 335482 22383 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 335482 22383 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 335482 22383 5710.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 335482 22383 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 335482 22383 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 00006092 334842 47702 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 00006093 334843 48069 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 00001518 334844 48134 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 00001560 334906 48155 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 00001573 334907 48456 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 00008060 335357 47282 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 335483 574000 335484 574025 335485 574014 335486 574194 335487 11118A 380028 2113/2014 102607 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335404 4456 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335405 4472 171.00 OFFICIATING FEES 335406 4491 513.00 380029 2113/2014 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE , 173.70 REPAIR KEY REMOTE 334845 234826 173.70 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1554.6230 1621.6103 1621.6103 1621.6103 1553.6180 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by.GL Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 — . 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380030 211312014 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued.:. 520.20 TISSUE, LINERS, DETERGENT 335380 35202 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 520.20 380031 2/1312014 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 75.00 TRAINING 335318 2407 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 75.00 380032 2/1312014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,782.50 'REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001535 334846 34646 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS " 2,782.50 380033 2113/2014 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 12,145.49 WATER PURCHASE 334908 431 -0005.300 -21 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 14 - 12,145.49 360034 211312014 102668 MINNESOTA CHAPTER IAAI 75.00 DUES 334909 020414 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 75.00 _ 380036 2/13/2014 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 396.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT CLASSES 335477 629430 -3610 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 396.00 380036 2/13/2014 101637 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL -STEVE HAMER 335320 2014 RENEWAL 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 23.00 380037 2/13/2014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 397.00 UTILITY RATES STUFFERS 335319 14803 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 397.00 380038 2/1312014 102776 MN DNR ECO- WATERS -RES 140.00 WATER USE PERMIT 334847 1960 -0231 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 140.00 .380039 211312014 102776 MN DNR ECO- WATERS -RES 35,875.15 1973 -1119 ANNUAL CHARGE 335488 WATER USE 2013 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 35,875.15 2/1112014 14:37:50 Page - 18 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DWI FORFEITURE TRAINING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No 380040 2/1312014 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 550.00 WEDDINGADS 335358 IN4913 5760.6122 550.00 380041 211312014 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 17.86 BOLTS 00006089 334848 941186 -00 5422.6530 40.21 SHIELDS 00006091 334849 941970 -00 5422.6530 58.07 380042 2/1312014 101911 NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO 640.00 SPRINKLER MAINTENANCE 335321 29715 1470.6215 475.00 SPRINKLER MAINTENANCE 335322 29716 1470.6215 1,115.00 380043 2/13/2014 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 814.50 334951 67976 5842.5513 870.50. 335237 67975 5862.5513 1,685.00 380044 2/1312014 133613- NITTI ROLLOFF & DEMOLITION 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -5700 70TH ST W 335281 ED128216REFUND 1495.4109 2,500.00 380046 .2/13/2014 116616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 543.50 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1260.6406 153.00 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1552.6406 250.00 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1552.6511 5,698.75 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1301.6201 4,175.75 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1646.6201 1,148.50 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 1553.6201 1,885.20 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 5422.6201 3,696.00 UNIFORMS 334850 NIA7071 5913.6201 17,550.70 360046 2/13/2014 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 857.75 STEEL 00005881 334910 279473 1553.6530 857.75 380047 2/13/2014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 158.00 LAMP 00005927 334851 35331 1553.6530 158.00 Subledger Account Description Continued... ADVERTISING OTHER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 2111/2014 14:37:50 Page - 19 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING INSPECTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page= 20 Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380047 211312014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Continued... 380048- 2/13/2014 133611 NORTHERN'S ONE HOUR HTG & AC 182.50 PERMIT REFUND 80% 335323 ED128738 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 182.50 380049 2/13/2014 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 39.21 ART SUPPLIES 00009314 334853 45256701 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 39.21 380060 2/1312014 131687 OASIS FOR YOUTH 2,000.00 2014 GRANT 334854 020114 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 2,000.00 380061 2113/2014 133621, ''O'BRIEN; DEBORAH 83.73 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335359 5119 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 83.73 380062 2113/2014 103578 :OFFICE DEPOT 126.78 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335361 673165221001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 91.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335362 691237116001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 218.54 380063 211312014 133280 O'GARA, LAURIE 302.00 DIRECTORY AD SALES 335360 0003 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 302.00 380064 .2113/2014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 87.44 TOOLS 00001497 334855 531129 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 19.22 CHAINS 335324 530898 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 28.00 CHAIN, LINKS 00008059 335363 531108 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 134.66 380065 2/13/2014 118761 PACAL INDUSTRIES LLC 425.00 ANGLE IRON 00005669 334856 63715 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 425.00 380066 2/13/2014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 16,912.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 7 335489 021414 01398.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS LAKE EDINA B 16,912.95 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 335241 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380069 2113/2014 Council Check Register by GL 2556010 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Council Check Register and Summary 335243 334952 8435595 -IN 5842.5513 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 1,064.93 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380066 211312014 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 6435606 -IN Continued... 380067 2113/2014 129485 PAPCO INC. 335450 8434292 -CM 5862.5513 196.57 CLEANING SUPPLIES 335325 83377 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5862.5513 196.57 VERNON SELLING 380060 211312014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 380068 2113/2014 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY VERNON SELLING 609.07 2111/2014 14:37 :50 Page - 21 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY 301.50 335238 14013 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 301.50 335241 2556012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380069 2113/2014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2556010 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,019.42 335243 334952 8435595 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,064.93 335244 335239 8435612 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,156.01 335245 335240 6435606 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 80.25- 335246 335450 8434292 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5,160.11 335247 2556003 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 380060 211312014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2556014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 609.07 335249 335364 18609725 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,119.98 335451 335365 18609773 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,729.05 335452 2556005 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 380061 2113/2014 287 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2556004 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS 48 335241 2556012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 57.12 335242 2556010 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,679.31 335243 2556009 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 882.43 335244 2556011 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,625.17 335245 2556015 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,667.92 335246 2556013 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 136:23 335247 2556003 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 171.36 335248 2556014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 50.77- 335249 3520663 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 70.12 335451 2556200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.24 335452 2556005 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 91.12 335453 2556004 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 482.19 335454 2556002 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9,197.92 380062 2/1312014 100964 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 134.79 WIPER BLADES 00005944 334911 1- 230957 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 134.79 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380062 2/1312014 100964 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. Continued... 380063 2/1312014 100967 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 2,155.62 SEAL KITS 00001506 334857 0062478 -IN 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,155.62 380064 2/13/2014 100968 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 43.16 PEST CONTROL 335326 4063977 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 43.16 380066 211312014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 536.01 TIRES 00005834 334858 210100786 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES 538.01 380066 2/1312014 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 73.80 UNIFORM PURCHASE 334912 020514 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 73.80 380067 2113/2014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 881.81 LINERS, ICE MELT 00008056 335366 6692 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 687.79 TOWELS, LINERS, TISSUE 00002092 335367 6733 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 756.73 ICE MELT 00002092 335368 6731 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 2,326.33 360068 2113/2014 133612 RAYANDERSON &SONS 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW -5220 KELLOGG AVE 335282 ED128365REFUND 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT 2,500.00 380069 211312014 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 900.00 SAFETY BOOTS 334913 268000000800 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 263.48 SAFETY BOOTS ` 334913 268000000800 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 413.48 SAFETY BOOTS 334913 266000000800 5761.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,576.96 x380070 211312014 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 35,190.09 RECYCLING - 335407 3404539 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 35,190.09 380071 2/13/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 343.07 ASSESSING ENVELOPES 335327 79684 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.12- CREDIT 335328 3212 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 22 Business Unit WELL HOUSES PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING INSPECTIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING RECYCLING ASSESSING ASSESSING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /. Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380071 2/13/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. Continued... 320.95 380072 2/13/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 179.84 SOFTENER SALT 00001490 334859 00294425 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.24 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 334860 00294538 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 330.08 380073 - 2/1312014 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 179.00 334953 14 -10239 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 381.25 334954 14 -10347 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 255.00 335250 14 -10426 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 815.25 380074 2/13/2014 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 3,708.00 SAFETY TRAINING- 335490 670 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,708.00 380076 2/13/2014 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 334861 R000033602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 113.07 380076 2/13/2014 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 61.10 ART WORK SOLD 335369 020614 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 61.10 380077 2/13/2014 - 104161 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 777.15 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 334862 6103662994 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 777.15 380078 2/13/2014 101677 SCHMOLL, RUTH 316.35 PETTY CASH - 334914 020414 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 316.35 380079 2/13/2014 133628 SCREEN MEDIC 1,290.20 FIBERGLASS SCREENS 335408 3647 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,290.20 380080 2/13/2014 101687 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 18,000.00 2014 SERVICES 334863 013114 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18,000.00 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 23 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES PARKING RAMP FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION R55CKR2 LOGIS100 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING Council Check Register by GL 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380080 2/13/2014 101687 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 380081 2113/2014 131866 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 106.34 HOT DOG BUNS 335491 233097 5520.5510 106.34 380082 2/13/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 3,149.25 334955 1128088 5842.5512 2,876.55 334956 1128087 5842.5513 2,572.00 335251 1128090 5862.5513 1,389.57 335252 1128091 5862.5512 .50 335253 1126089 5862.5512 932.16 335254 1128086 5822.5512 664.00 335455 1128065 5822.5513 11, 584.03 360083 2/13/2014 102036 SPRINGSTED INC. 2,000.00 RECRUITMENT SERVICES 334864 OD1126.104 1556.6121 4,100.00 EXECUTIVE SEARCH 335370 1- 001126.103 1170.6103 6,100.00 380084, . 211312014 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 1,360.68 ANGLE CYLINDER, PIVOT BEAMS 334915 29693 1553.6530 1,360.68 380086 2113/2014 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 485.37 CAMERA HOIST FRAME 00001532 334865 26770 5920.6406 485.37 380086 2/13/2014 101016 STRETCHERS 13.98 GUN CLEANING RODS 335329 11071645 7412.6406 13.98 380087 2113/2014 104349 :STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 5,412.85 GOLF DOME CABLING 335409 17388 5210.6230 ' 5,412.85 _ 380088 2/13/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 3,343.83 VEHICLE REPAIRS 334916 642123 1553.6180 3,343.83 Subledger Account Description Continued... . COST OF GOODS SOLD 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 24 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY.DF EDINA 2111/2014 14:37:50 Council Check, Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380089 2113/2014 102300 TCALMC Continued... 190.00 TRAINING FEE (2) 335411 APR 10 2014 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 190.00 380090 2/1312014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 184.20 335255 803529 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 161.25 335256 803528 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,673.15 335257 803530 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,018.60 380091 2/1312014 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 330.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334866 2014 - 116149 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 330.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334866 2014 - 116149 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 330.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 334866 2014- 116149 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 990.00 380092 2113/2014 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 143.50 PARK BOARD MEETING MINUTES 334917 M20302 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 163.50 VET MEMORIAL COMM MINUTES 334918 M20303 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKADMIN. GENERAL 307.00 380093 2/1312014 106166 TIM'S QUALITY PLUMBING 447.00 REPAIR SERVICE LINE 00001527 334867 213572 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 447.00 380094 211312014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 1,900.00 PALLET FORKS 335412 2238568 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,615.40-- CREDIT 335413 2964867 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 284.60 380096 2113/2014 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 370.50 BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES 334868 002014000023 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 146.20 EDINA BRIDGE REHAB 334869 002014000024 10098.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BR8 78TH STREET BRIDGE REHAB 1,834.23 ENGINEERING$ERVICES 00002093 335371 002014000025 5760.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 2,352.93 380096 2/13/2014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 87.00 336258 908717 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 87.00 380097 2113/2014 120596 T MOBILE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 2/1312014 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO CITY OF EDINA 124.00 Council Check Register by GL 334871 408390 1553.6585 Council Check Register and Summary 1,980.00 SIGNALS FOR GARAGE DOOR 00005770 334872 406391 1552.6406 2/13/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380097 2/13/2014 120696 T MOBILE Continued... 32.62 ENGINEERING SURVEY PHONE 335410 477067848 -1/14 1261.6188 TELEPHONE 5913.6180 225.00 EPD T- MOBLIE CARDS 335410 477067848 -1/14 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 257.62 380103 .211312014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 380098 2/1312014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 207.13 LIQUOR BAGS 405.77 WELDING GAS, HELMET 00005968 334870 10009174 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 33.96- 405.77 335421 299140CM 5862.6512 380099 2/13/2014 173.17 104064 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATNE 116.50 JAN 2014 SERVICES 335414 269634 -1/14 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 116.50 1,718.10 IPHONE FOR PD 380100 2113/2014 9719359653 116636 TRAVELERS - 1,576.20 SERVICE FOR 2 MONTHS 2,979.00 DEDUCTIBLE 335415 000455435 1550.6200 INSURANCE 3,294:30 1,347.50 335416 000455436 1550.6200 INSURANCE 2/1312014 472.50 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 335417 000455069 1550.6200 INSURANCE 1,312.50 60.00 335418 000455068 1550.6200 INSURANCE 380101 2/1312014 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 124.00 TRANSMITTER 334871 408390 1553.6585 1,980.00 SIGNALS FOR GARAGE DOOR 00005770 334872 406391 1552.6406 2,104.00 380102 2/1312014 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,297.50 WATERMAIN REPAIR 335419 19700 5913.6180 5,297.50 . 380103 .211312014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 207.13 LIQUOR BAGS 335420 298866 -00 5862.6512 33.96- CREDIT 335421 299140CM 5862.6512 173.17 380104 211312014 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 1,718.10 IPHONE FOR PD 335424 9719359653 1400.6215 - 1,576.20 SERVICE FOR 2 MONTHS 335424 9719359653 1400.6160 3,294:30 380106 2/1312014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 60.00 TIRE 335372 129140003 5761.6406 ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 2111/2014 14:37:50 Page - 26 Business Unit CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL" EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL I.' 'S OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380106 2/13/2014 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 60.00 380106 211312014 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 179.85 BATTERIES 00001568 334873 8017025 1301.6556 458.91 LIGHTING 00001567 334919 8017012 1551.6406 181.46 LIGHTING 00001567 334919 8017012 7411.6406 620.22 380107 2113/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA 262.00 335259 0092378 -IN 5862.5513 634.75 335260 0092379 -IN 5862.5512 217.71 335261 0092375 -IN 5842.5512 612.00 335456 0092376 -IN 5822.5513 103.50 335457 5822.5512 1,829.96 380108 2/1312014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 899.32 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335373 38652082 5520.5510 50.42 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335374 38690883 5520.5510 34.03 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335375 38701257 5520.5510 1,206.18 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335376 38709125 5520.5510 9.48- CREDIT 335377 38614836 5520.5510 17.54- CREDIT 335378 38627047 5520.5510 17.57 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335492 38131058 5520.5510 25.77 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335493 38405142 5520.5510 2,206.27 380109 2/13/2014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 147.96 TRASH REMOVAL 334874 6833471- 2282 -5 5821.6182 147:96 380110 2113/2014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 547.60 LEAK LOCATES 00001531 334875 4606 5913.6103 547.60 380111 211312014 130674 WATSON COMPANY 369.87 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335379 835311 5520.5510 369.87 380112 2113/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Subledger Account Description Continued...' TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2111/2014 14:37:50 Page - 27 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 380112 2113/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,728.05 1,133.83 901.20 3,763.08 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2113/2014 Doc No Inv No Account No 334957 352562 -00 5842.5513 335262 352688=00 5862.5513 . 335263 352560-00 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 28 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 380113 2/1312014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 3,125.54 335264 490528 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 335265 490525 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,398.29 335266 490527 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE -YORK SELLING 314.24 335267 490524 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 169.12- 335268 64075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,000.40 335458 490523 5822.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6,670.47 380114 211312014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA - 10,780.92 334958 1080140508 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,589.35 334959 1080137880 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 146.30 334960 1080140510 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,537.27 334961 1080140509 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,000.75 334962 1060139286 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,371.65 334963 1080139284 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 242.70- 334964 2080030197 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,206.04 335269 1080140506 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 565.60 335270 1080140507 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,057.40 335271 1080139285 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,525.26 335272 1080140504 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 73.15 335273 1080140505 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,802.59 335274 1080140423 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 49.15 335459 1080141376 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 43,462.93 380115 2113/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 1,998.75 334965 1090175508 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 756.70 334966 1090175292 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 43.00 334967 1090175293 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,721.25 334968 1090176245 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 86.00 334969 1090176247 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 123.00 334970 1090176246 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,833.35 335460 1090178389 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,820.09 335461 1090178481 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLIN. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Council Check Register by GL Page - 29 Council Check Register and Summary 2/13/2014 - 2113/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380116 2/13/2014 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC Continued... 21.50 335462 1090178390 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 217.60 335463 1090178388 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,986.05 335464 1090178387 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 18,609.29 380116 2/13/2014 106740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,524.50 BYERLY'S UTILITY OBSERVATION 335494 5-01686-470 1261.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 2,104.00 STATE AID TRAFFIC COUNTS 335495 4-01686 -480 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION 6,022.00 HAZELTON RD DESIGN 335496 7 -01686 -460 01417.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN HAZELTON RD IMPROVEMENTS 639.00 THINK BANK TRAFFIC STUDY 335497 3-01686 -490 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 11,289.50 380117 2/1312014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 26.25 51- 4151897 -6 334920 399746470 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.88 51- 7567037-0 334921 399795034 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 244.73 51- 9337452 -8 334922 399481272 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 685.57 51- 5634814 -2 334923 399422100 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 2,548.86 51- 4966303 -6 334924 399760513 1330.6165 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 666.43 51- 9422326 -6 334925 399656183 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 287.77 51- 6046826 -0 334926 399429706 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,021.12 51- 6229265 -9 334927 399682044 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 878.44 51- 6229265 -9 334927 399682044 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 257.71 51- 6137136 -8 334928 399776463 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 27,391.54 51- 4888627 -1 334929 399758519 5511.6185 LIGHT &POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 139.80 51- 5938955 -6 334930 399429581 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 5,295.88 51- 0837548 -4 334931 399854346 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 1,974.01 51- 6979948 -4 334932 399622694 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 1,680.19 51- 6979948 -4 334932 399622694 5861.6185 LIGHT &.POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,241.67 51- 6979948 -4 334932 399622694 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 45,362.85 380118' 2/1312014 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 12,436.40 DIESEL FUEL 00005956 334876 605488 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,335.00 DIESEL FUEL 00005970 335422 607083 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,715.51 UNLEADED FUEL 00005970 335423 607084 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24,486.91 380119 2113/2014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 516.00 335275 12687 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 516.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2113/2014 — 2/13/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc-No. Inv No Account No 380119 211312014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 380120 2/13/2014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 116.11 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 335330 54060504 7411.6406 116.11 Subledger Account Description Continued... 696,182.61 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 696,182.61 Total Payments 696,182.61 GENERALSUPPLIES 2/11/2014 14:37:50 Page - 30 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA . Council Check Summary 2/13/2014 - 2113/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 228,701.27 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 396.00 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,390.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 53,529.97 05100 ART CENTER FUND 451.31 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 18,242.15 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 385.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 3,746.77 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 40,085.12 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 2,303.79 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 5,198.00 05800 LIQUOR FUND 211,045.06 05900 UTILITY FUND 79,782.61 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 825.57 05950 RECYCLING FUND . 35,190.09 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,051.52 09232 CENTENNIALTIF DISTRICT 5,000.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,858.38 Report Totals 696,182.61 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing - policies and proved res date s, Finance irector City Manager 2/11/2014 14:37:57 Page - 1 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Mark K. Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of January 2, 2014 w9�,1� O le onpo 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. C. Action Requested: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2014. Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) reviewed the January 2, 2014 Traffic Safety Committee Report at their January 16 meeting and moved to forward the report to the City Council for approval; see attached draft minutes. Attachments: Revised Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2014 Draft ETC Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2014 G:\ Engineering \infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Safety Committee \City Council Reports\2014 \Item IV. x. Traffic Safety Report of January 2, 2014.dooc City of Edina ^ 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Thursday, January 2, 2014 The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on January 2. The Interim City Engineer, Public Works Director, Transportation Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and the Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. From these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the January 16 Edina Transportation Commission and the February 18 City Council agenda. SECTION A: Request on which the Committee recommends approval: Al. Request for more or improved signage for "do not block intersection" signs at intersection of Rabun Drive and 70th Street. This request comes from a resident living in the neighborhood to the north of the intersection. The requestor states; vehicles are blocking the intersection of Rabun Drive and 70th Street during peak rush hour times, particularly between 4 and 5 pm. Vehicles are ignoring the "do not block intersection" signs. The requestor would like to see more or improved signage for "do not block intersection ". Currently there are two do not block to intersection signs located on eastbound Picture: Rabun Dr. and 70 St. taken from Google maps 70th Street, located at the intersection. 70th Street is a divided 4 lane roadway. The south leg of the intersection is an entrance for a parking lot. The north leg of the intersection, Rabun Drive, is the only entrance on the south side of Brookview Heights neighborhood. The MNMUTCD does not give further recommendations for placement of "do not block intersection" signs, only stating "Traffic Signal signs may be installed at certain locations to clarify signal control. It is stated "A STATE LAW plaque (R4 -X5) may be installed above these signs to remind road users that the regulation applies at all locations." Traffic Safety Report Page 1 of 11 January 2, 2014 After discussion the staff recommends installation of orange plaques above and below the existing "do not block intersection" signs to help draw attention to the signs. SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial: Map: Rabun Dr. and 70`h St. B1. Request for additional signage for crosswalk at the intersection of South View Lane and Dalrymple Road. This request comes from a resident who lives on Dalrymple Road. The requestor states; traffic is not yielding to pedestrians. The resident would like additional signage to help warn drivers of pedestrians in the area. This location is near schools and a community center. Currently there's a painted crosswalk with pedestrian crossing signs, a sidewalk on the south side of the road and a pedestrian landing on the north side. There is a stop sign on southbound Dalrymple. There are no recorded crashes at the intersection of South View and Dalrymple. The criterion for placement of crosswalks and type of control is outlined in the Appendix section 2A. Traffic Safety Report January 2, 2014 �4 .1 ! I g9lE r r' �• �'i7%it �.rr- 5l'L�b �E1�,; $6to 5ry11 lr.7 r., n.w, 5511 v 1 5611 aA #it 14 i1� t �' <1r i r'17 x.15 I 1�` r.1a ! `' -•17 Jr 1u. I IL j�► , 1. ...,..r. ioa Map: South View and Dalrymple Page 2 of 11 Counts of pedestrians were taken at the intersection. A maximum total of 19 pedestrians were recorded crossing South View Lane within a two -hour period. The ADT for this intersection is 3701 vehicles with the peak hour being 7:00 am. A gap study was performed during the peak hour, resulting in 8.8 gaps. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request for additional signage, since existing signage and markings are already adequate based on the city policy. Photo: South View Ln and Dalrymple Rd from the north B2. Request for a No U -Turn sign in the area of the Benton Avenue parking bay. This request came from a City of Edina employee. The requestor states; vehicles are making U -Turns in a parking bay at the intersection of Benton Avenue and Tracy Avenue. This might cause a traffic safety concern. The requestor would like to see a no U -Turn sign installed in the area. Currently Benton Avenue has a one -way traffic circle with three exists. There are parking bays on the west and east sides of the traffic circle as shown on the map. Map: Benton Ave. parking bay A traffic study was performed, with a camera set up to the west of the parking bay. In a 24 hour period; 2839 vehicles passed the parking bay, 5 vehicles parked in this area, 1 vehicle performed a U -Turn. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request for a No U -Turn sign. B3. Request for replacing the Yield signs with Stop signs at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and Garrison Lane. This request comes from a resident living near the intersection. The requestor states; vehicles crossing St. Johns Avenue are being hit by people going too fast down St. Johns. Also, the Yield signs on Garrison and Ashcroft Lanes are hard to see and are not being observed. Currently there are Yield signs for traffic crossing St. Johns Avenue. Traffic Safety Report Page 3 of 11 January 2, 2014 The criterion for placement of Stop signs is found in the Appendix section 1A. In 2000 a traffic count was completed for St. Johns Avenue north of Garrison Lane resulting in an ADT of 101, and an 85th percentile speed of 26.9 mph. In 2004 a traffic count was completed for Garrison Lane east of St. Johns resulting in an ADT of 212 and an 85th percentile speed of 28 mph. There are two recorded auto crashes; a crash resulting in property damage in 2002, and a crash resulting in personal injury in 2013. During the December 4, 2013 meeting, the traffic safety committee recommended looking further Photo: St. Johns Ave. looking south into the crash from 2013 to determine if it was an unavoidable crash. In an overview of the crash, the driver of the vehicle struck crossing St. Johns slowed down, but did not see the vehicle traveling down St. Johns. It was noted the Yield sign has a tree near it with a branch hanging down which may or may not be blocking the Yield sign. After discussion the staff recommends denying the request for replacing the Yield signs with Stop signs. Staff will check to make sure the Yield signs are clear of obstruction. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date: C1. Request for "police enforcement or signage" at the crosswalk located at the intersection of York Avenue and Edinborough Way. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area and states; the crosswalk on the north leg of the York Avenue and Edinborough Way intersection is "dangerous ". They state "very few cars stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk. Also, there are senior living apartments nearby." The requestor would like for police enforcement or signage at the crosswalk. Currently there exist crosswalks on the north and west legs of the intersection, but without any I d 4rp r� +s�r. Y _ `T. s - t• signage. There is a median, crossing is an , crossing York Avenue which can be used as a safe Map: York Ave. and Edinborough Way haven for pedestrians. There are stop signs on Edinborough Way. The speed limit on York Avenue is 35 mph. Traffic Safety Report January 2, 2014 Page 4 of 11 The criterion for placement of crosswalks can be found in the Appendix section 2A. The ADT for this intersection was found to be 3 11,662, with the peak hour occurring at 4:45 pm. A gap study was performed during this peak hour. ._ _ The MNDOT Traffic Signal Timing and a Coordination Manual states on divided roadways; a divided road is one with a median island over 6 feet wide and includes a pedestrian pushbutton in the median. if a pushbutton is not in the median, the recommended practice, pedestrian clearance interval must cross them completely from near side curb to for side curb. This means for the gap study the crossing island should not be Picture: York Ave and Edinborough Way from NW considered a "safe haven ". The gap study resulted in 0.8 gaps on average for a 5 minute period. If the crossing island were to be considered a "safe haven ", the gaps for northbound traffic were 10.5 and for southbound traffic were 14.3 gaps on average for a 5 minute period. The Local Traffic Control list recommends installation of an overhead mounted flasher for less than 3 gaps, and pavement markings and signage for above 5 gaps. After discussion the staff recommends further study and communicating with Hennepin County before making a recommendation. C2. Request for additional signage for the crosswalk at the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. This request comes from a resident who lives in the area. The requestor states; traffic does not stop for pedestrians crossing the street at the intersection of Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue. The requestor would like additional signage in the area. Currently there are painted crosswalks on the south and west legs of the intersection. There are crosswalk warning signs located on York Avenue north, south, and immediately at the crosswalk. No signage is located on Parklawn Avenue. York Avenue is 6 lanes wide, including 2 turn lanes at the crosswalk, with a distance of 126 feet from curb to curb. Parklawn is 4 lanes wide, with a distance of 65 feet from curb to curb. There have been 9 accidents at this intersection since 2009. Traffic Safety Report January 2, 2014 Map: York Ave. and Parklawn Ave. k. t_ r Page 5 of 11 i •: y ^e F' � INf �I' 1 G s � ", t Map: York Ave. and Parklawn Ave. k. t_ r Page 5 of 11 The criterion for placement of crosswalks can be found in the Appendix section 2A. A traffic gap count was taken during the peak hour, 5 pm. The average gaps per 5 minute period on York Avenue were 0. The average gaps per 5 minute period going across Parklawn Avenue were 1.7. Both of these were below 3 gaps, according to the Local Traffic Control list it's recommended to install an overhead mounted flasher. After discussion the staff recommends further study and communicating with Hennepin County before making a recommendation. C3. Request for an All -Way Stop sign at the intersection of Valley View Road and Valley Lane. This request comes from a resident who uses the intersection. The requestor states; the volume of vehicles at the intersection of Valley View Road and Valley Lane is causing delays and possible traffic safety issues. The requestor would like for an All -Way Stop sign at the intersection. Currently there exist a stop sign on Valley Lane westbound. There is a left turn lane for southbound Valley View Road. There are 8 recorded crashes at this intersection since 2008, including several failures to yield the right -of -way and a vehicle making a left turn. Picture: York Ave. and Porklown Ave. from the south t Picture: Valley View Rd. and Valley Ln. facing west The criterion for installation of Multi -Way Stop signs is found in the Appendix section 113. The volume of traffic entering the intersection from Valley View Road (major street) did not average at least 200 vehicles per hour over the same 8 hour period. There were a total of 980 southbound left turns, 712 northbound right turns, 842 westbound right turns and 374 westbound left turns during the 24 hour study. Traffic Safety Report Page 6 of 11 January 2, 2014 Valley View Road vs. Valley Lane: Vehicles per Hour Time Vehicles Per Hour Major Vehicles Per Hour Minor 10:00 351 66 11:00 365 46 12:00 38.6 69 13:00 451 69 14:00 454 91 15.00 438 e_ 16:00 501 99 17:00 707 112 18:00 934 112 19:00 588 83 20:00 377 58 Average 505 79 After discussion the staff recommends including study of this intersection along with traffic analysis of Tracy / TH 62 associated with future Tracy Avenue reconstruction before making a recommendation. Map: Valley View Rd. and Valley Ln. Peak Hour Turning Movements SB Left Turns NB Right Turns WB Left Turns WB Right Turns 166 260 33 79 Peak Hour. 5 p.m. 1046 vehicles through intersection: C4. Request for an All -Way Stop or a traffic signal at the intersection of Valley View Road and Tracy Avenue. This request comes from a resident in the area. The requestor states; trying to cross Tracy Avenue is impossible to do at peak driving times. The requestor would like to see an All -Way Stop or a traffic signal at this intersection. Currently there are stop signs located on westbound Valley View Road and the exit ramp from highway 62. The exit ramp has a right turn only lane and a left turn or through lane. Tracy Avenue has a left turn only lane northbound. The closest stop signs on Tracy Avenue are located at Olinger Boulevard to the north, and no close stop signs are located to the south. The criterion for placement of All -Way Stop signs Picture: Tracy Ave. and Valley View Rd. from north is found in the Appendix section 1B. Traffic Safety Report Page 7 of 11 January 2, 2014 There most reported crashes in a 12 -month period were four from 4/06 through 4/07, all of which were right angle collisions due to a failure to yield the right -of -way. As shown in the above table, during an 8 hour period greater than 300 vehicles per hour entered the major street approaches and greater than 200 vehicles per hour entered the minor street approaches. The average delay for vehicles crossing Tracy Avenue was calculated during the peak hour for the minor approaches, 17:30 to 18:30. The average delay was calculated to be 54 seconds. It should be noted this delay may have been greater, only vehicles which could be seen were counted, some vehicles may have been out of view of the camera. This delay is still greater than the minimum requirement of 30 seconds. Map: Tracy Ave. and Valley View Rd. After discussion the staff recommends including study of this intersection along with traffic analysis of Tracy / TH 62 associated with future Tracy Avenue reconstruction before making a recommendation. C5. Request for No Parking or No Pick Up on Gleason Road in front of Creek Valley Elementary School. This request comes from a resident living in the area, they drive Gleason Road frequently. The requestor states; vehicles picking up children after school, at approximately 4 pm, are parking on and blocking Gleason Road, making it unsafe for travel. The requestor would like to see No Parking or No Pick Up on Gleason Road in front of the school. Currently there is a school speed limit of 20 mph on Gleason Road. There is No Parking on the east side of the road. There is No Parking on the east side of the road. There is an area for student drop off / pick up located on the school property as seen on the map. Gleason Road is 34 feet wide in this area. Map: Gleason Rd. at Creek Valley School Traffic Safety Report Page 8 of 11 January 2, 2014 Trace Ave and Valley View Rd: Vehicles per hour Flour SB / NB EB / WB 12:30 387 192 13:30 339 217 14:30 539 235 15:30 879 268 16:30 949 254 17:30 998 334 18:30 766 318 19:30 354 225 Average 651 255 Picture: Gleason Rd, from the south After discussion the staff recommends coordination with the Parks Department and the School District for further study. SECTION D: Other traffic related issues handled. D1. Email from resident concerning semi /trailer traffic down residential streets in 'Presidents' neighborhood. The resident would like for their concerns to be communicated with Super Value. Super Value was contacted, and agreed to send out a memo to drivers asking them not to use residential streets. The resident was informed of inquiry with Super Value. D2. Request was made for a Deaf Child sign to be installed on Bonnie Brae Drive. This was approved to be installed, will need to wait for spring to install due to frozen ground. D3. Email from resident concerned with vehicles through the turn lane to Normandale Road (south) and cutting people off to continue east on West 701h Street. The resident would like to see an occasional posting of a patrol car at the intersection. This request was forwarded to the Edina Police Department. Traffic Safety Report Page 9 of 11 January 2, 2014 a Appendix 1A. (MNMUTCD 2B.4) YIELD or STOP signs should be used at an intersection if one or more of the following conditions exist: A. An intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right -of -way rule would not be expected to provide reasonable compliance with the law; B. A street entering a designated through highway or street; and /or C. An un- signalized intersection in a signalized area. In addition, the use of YIELD or STOP signs should be considered at the intersection of two minor streets or local roads where the intersection has more than three approaches and where one or more of the following conditions exist: A. The combined vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian volume entering the intersection from all approaches averages more the 2,000 units per day; B. The ability to see conflicting traffic on an approach is not sufficient to allow a road user to stop or yield in compliance with the normal right -of -way rule if such stopping or yielding is necessary; and /or C. Crash records indicate that five or more crashes that involve the failure to yield the right -of -way rule have been reported within a 3 -year period, or that three or more such crashes have been reported within a 2 -year period. YIELD or STOP signs should not be used for speed control. 1B. (MNMUTCD 2B.7) Multi -Way STOP The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi -way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multi -way stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12 -month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi -way stop installation. Such crashes include right -turn and left -turn collisions as well as right -angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor - street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th- percentile approach speed of the major- street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left -turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle /pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and Traffic Safety Report Page 10 of 11 January 2, 2014 J D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi -way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. 2A. Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks A. Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement. B. Marked crosswalks will only be- placed in an area-that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight.hour period. C. Marking for crosswalks will be established by. measuringthe "Vehicle Gap Time ". This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: 1. More than five gaps — Pavement marking and signage only. 2. Four to five gaps —add activated pedestal mounted flasher 3. Less than three gaps —add' activated overhead mounted flasher. D. Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater/than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization. E. Other conditions that warrant crosswalks: 1. Routes to schools 2. Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities. 3. Locations adjacent to public parks. 4. Locations where significant numbers of handicapped - persons cross a- street. 5. Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street. F. Crosswalks will only be placed at intersections. Traffic Safety Report January 2, 2014 Page 11 of 11 DRAFT ETC Minutes of January 16, 2014 Member Bass said the plan's recommendations were categorized by short, mid or long -term plans and implementation would be done by the City or District or jointly. Finally, she said the plan would be presented to other committees for review and input and adoption by City Council and the School Board; establish a working group to help with implementation; and monitor funding sources. Discussion Member lyer recommended a sidewalk on W. 66th St. west of TH -100 (on the steep hill); establish drop -off locations that students can walk from;. create an efficient pedestrian connection from the Cornelia Neighborhood to South View and Concord which would include a pedestrian bridge over TH -62 that accommodates bikes (existing bridge is not bike friendly); consider higher fines when drivers park on street during the winter and snowplows are not plow properly; and reduce the, number of garbage trucks on the streets when students are walking. Member Boettge said she did not.recall receiving a parent survey and asked how the survey was distributed. Member Bass could not recall all the avenues that were used but some included the District's In The Know newsletter, Edina Patch and other means that individual principals used. Member'Boettge asked if more surveys are planned and member Bass said not a parent survey but student surveys are included in the plan. Member Janovy asked if the ETC would like to make a recommendation to forward the report to the City Council for adoption. Member lyer said he would like his suggestions addressed before forwarding the report to the City Council and he asked if there was an opportunity for more people to be involved. Member Bass said she would forward his suggestions to the consultant for inclusion and that. he could participate in the working group. The consensus was to include member lyer's suggestions and bring the plan back next month for a final review. Traffic Safety Committee Report of January 2, 2014 Section Al. Another issue in this area said chair Nelson are the two left turn lanes under the TH -100 bridge — one turning north to TH -100 (north left turn lane) and the other presumably to the frontage road (south left turn lane). He asked if there could be better signage because if you're in the south left turn lane trying to go onto TH -100 it is difficult and traffic often backs up to Rabun Drive because of the turn lanes. Transportation planner Nolan will look into this (member Janovy noted that this area has been looked at in the past). Section B1. Member Janovy asked for clarification on what the request was and transportation planner Nolan said it was for additional (unspecified) signage; however, the area is already signed and staff did not think advanced warning sign would be effective. Member Janovy said limiting parking near the crosswalks was raised in the past and she suggested checking to see how far back from a crosswalk parking is allowed and extending that even further back to allow for.pedestrian visibility. Section C2. Transportation planner Nolan said Hennepin County has offered to install a rapid flashing beacon and an enhanced crosswalk in 2014 and he is checking to see if they would consider straightening out the crosswalk and adding.a pedestrian refuge. In the appendix, member Janovy suggested identifying marked pedestrian crosswalk as City of Edina policy to make it clear what is controlled by the City. Motion was made by member Janovy and seconded by member Bass to forward the January 2 Traffic Safety Report to City Council. All voted aye. Motion carried. 3of5 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: February 18, 2014 �yLe H 0 leas . � Agenda Item #: IV. D. Action Discussion ❑ Information El. Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -13 Requesting Variance From Standards for State Aid Operation for W. 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue Action Requested: Review and approve the attached resolution authorizing staff and consultant to pursue a variance from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Variance Committee for a variance on minimum lane widths in order to continue the use of advisory bike lane pavement markings on W. 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue. Information / Background: Currently, W. 540 Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue is marked with advisory bike lanes as part of the Edina Bike Boulevard Project which was completed in 2012; however, because W. 546 Street is. being reconstructed in 2014 the City is required to gather two approvals for their continued use. A variance is required from MSA for on -road bicycle facilities to allow a 12 -ft wide outside lane in lieu of a 14 -ft wide outside lane. The existing section has two 5 -ft advisory bike lanes and a 14 -ft shared center area for a'total of 24 -ft or 12 -ft for each wide outside lane. Since advisory bike lanes are not officially• included in the MN Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) they are still considered experimental. Following approval of this variance request, staff will send a. letter to the Federal Highway Administration' (FHWA) seeking permission to continue the use of the advisory bike lane pavement markings for as long as the City sees fit. Our discussion with various officials lends us to believe this should only be a formality to get approval to, continue their use. Based on discussions with FHWA in Washington D.C., twelve cities are using advisory bike lanes across the country as part of an experiment. Many have submitted progress reports similar to the ones we are required to submit as part of the agreement. We asked for copies but thus far have not received those. Generally speaking according to them, all data submitted to date has shown results consistent with what was expected and have shown no significant safety concerns with the exception of Wooddale Avenue. A committee meets to review data collected from experimental devices or applications. This committee has not reviewed or considered any permanent action related to advisory bike lanes at this time and it is not anticipated to occur until after 2014. We clarified the following language from our agreement "to restore the site of the experiment to a condition that complies with the provisions of the MUTCD within 3 months following,the end of the time period of this experiment. If, as a result of the experimentation, a request is made that this Manual be changed to include the device or application being experimented with, the device or application will be permitted to remain in place until an. official rulemaking action has occurred." City of Edina ^ 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 According to FHWA, we are not required to make a specific request for this application to be added to the Manual. We do need, to seek . permission to continue the use at the discretion of the City for as long as we see fit. For all other experimental treatments installed as part of the Bike Boulevard Project, such as the green share the road markings on Valley View Road, if at the end of the experiment FHWA decides not to include the application in the MUTCD, we could either remove it at that time or leave it in place for its effective life (i.e. when the pavement markings typically would be replaced). Although the agreement states the treatment needs to be removed with 3 months, according the FHWA we will not be held to this timeframe. Attachment: Resolution .No. 2014 -13 %%Ed- nt8%engpubwks\PMCENTRAL SVCSIENG DWROJECTSICONTRACTS12014tENG 14-6 54th St 8 BridgMADMINWISCUtem N. D. Resolution No. 2014 -13 Req Variance.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -13 REQUESTING VARIANCE FROM STANDARDS FOR STATE AID OPERATIONS 541h STREET WEST - MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD TO FRANCE AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Edina Engineer is hereby authorized to request a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations, pursuant to Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operations 8820.3300 and 8820.9941, as they apply to the proposed advisory bike lane pavement markings associated with the reconstruction of 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue, State Aid Project 120 -142- 003, located in Edina, Minnesota and Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 require a minimum 14 -foot Wide Outside Lane; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina believes that the minimum design standards set forth by Minnesota Rules for State Aid Operation 8820.9941 as applicable to the proposed advisory bike lane pavement markings., associated with the reconstruction of 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue, create an undue hardship; and WHEREAS, said hardship has been in successful operation since the fall 2012 as part the Edina Bike Boulevard — Phase 1 Project, SP 120 - 091 -002, Federal Project No. NMTP 2712 (240); and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, located in Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby requests a variance from the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Operations Rules Chapter 8820.9941, Minimum Design Standards: On -Road Bicycle Facility for Urban; New or Reconstruction Projects to allow a 12 -foot Wide Outside Lane in lieu of a 14 -foot Wide Outside Lane in order for the City to continue use of advisory bike lane pavement markings as they currently exist along 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby indemnifies, saves and holds harmless the State of Minnesota and its agents and employees of and from claims, demands, actions, or causes of action arising out of, or by reason the continued use of advisory bike lane pavement markings along 54th Street West from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue in accordance with Minnesota Rules 8820:9941. The Council further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense, any action of proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim arising as a result of the granting of this variance. Dated: February 18, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard o Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov o 952 - 826 -0371 a Fax 952 - 826 -0392 o lass: To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. E. The Recommended Bid is From: Chad A. Millner, P.E, Director of Engineering ®Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -3 Bredesen Park D & Countryside F Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: February 11, 2014 April 12, 2014 Company: Palda & Sons, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. New Look Contracting, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. Northdale Construction Company, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: Palda & Sons, Inc. Amount. of Quote or Bid: $1,770,081.20 $1,829;599.86 $1,922,817.85 $ 1,998,237.20 $2,025,868.89 $21'135,646.37 $1 ,770,081.20 General Information: Due to the close geographical proximity and relative small size of each project, they were bid as one. By having one contractor control both areas, we were able to acquire better unit prices on items such as mobilization; we will be better able to coordinate schedules, and thus provide better service to the affected residents. This project includes the roadways of Hawkes Drive, Hawkes Terrace, and Warden Avenue in the Countryside F Neighborhood and Aspen Road, Tamarac Avenue, Tamarac Lane, Walnut Drive, and West 60th Street in the Bredesen Park B Neighborhood. The project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, upgrades to fire hydrants, curb and gutter spot repair or replacements, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. The project was ordered by City Council at the December 10, 2013 public hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. See the table below showing pending assessments versus low bid pending assessments. The City funded costs also saw an approximate 26% reduction. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER Project Pending Assessment Low Bid Pending Assessment Improvement No. BA -407 (Hawkes Dr & Terr) $11,000.00 $9,300.00 Improvement No. BA -408 (Warden Ave) $10,000.00 $10,400.00 Improvement No. BA -409 (Bredesen Park D) $11,500.00 $9,300.00 Page 2 These values can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. Staff will review the bid and work with the Contractor to determine if there are ways to reduce the cost associated with Improvement No. BA -408. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing in 2015. Due to the preliminary success of hydro- seeding, all of the 2014 projects will continue to restore turf areas with this technique. Staff will continue to monitor the progress of hydro- seeding from our 2013 projects throughout the 2014 season. Staff recommends awarding the project to Palda and Sons, Inc. Attachments: G:~CENTRAL SVCSIENG DMPROJECTSICONTRACT51 OMENG 143 Bredesen Park D Countryside FIADMINIMISCVtem IV. E. ENG 143 RFP.doct City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Date: . February 18, 2014 1N ow p Cn v6% o. coil IAAA Agenda Item #: IV. F. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Award of Bid - Contract ENG 14 -5 Strachauer Park B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 1 I , 2014 Company: McNamara Contracting, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Palda & Sons, Inc. GMH Asphalt Corporation New. Look. Contracting, Inc. Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. Valley Paving; Inc. Northdale Construction Company, Inc. Recommended Quote or Bid: McNamara Contracting, Inc. Bid or Expiration Date: April 12, 2014 Amount of, Quote or Bid: $1,109,412.05 $ 1,147,041.96 $1,158,175.74 $1,223,919.90 $.1 ,241,834.45 $1,302,251.44 $1,372,181.06 $1,372,960.28 $1,109,412.05 General Information: The project includes Abbott Avenue, West 62nd Street, York Avenue, and Zenith Avenue. It involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, and upgrades to fire hydrants, sidewalk and parking bays near Strachauer Park, concrete curb and gutter spot repair, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. The project was ordered by City Council at the December 10, 2013 public hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. At this point in the process we are anticipating the special assessment to be reduced by approximately 15% to $7,200.00 versus the $8,500.00 that was discussed at the public hearing. The City funded costs also saw an approximate 21 % reduction. These values can change based on construction related items such as soil corrections and turf restoration. The final special assessments will be determined prior to the final assessment hearing in 2015. Due to the preliminary success of hydro- seeding, all of the 2014 projects will continue to restore turf areas with this technique. Staff will continue to monitor the progress of hydro- seeding from our 2013 projects throughout the 2014 season. Staff recommends awarding the project to McNamara Contracting, Inc. Attachments: GAFMCENTRAL WMENG DWROJECTSICONTRACTSUOMENG 14-S Stmchauer Park BIADMINXMISCUtem W.F. ENG MS RFP.docx City of Edina - 4801 W. 501h St. - Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Dave Nelson, Chief of Police Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase - Six 2013 Ford PI Utility Vehicles Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: January 6, 2014 Company: Nelson Auto Center Recommended Quote or Bid: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Contract # 37669 Release A- 175(5) Agenda Item #: IV.G. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: November 30, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: $167,876.92 General Information: Replacement of six marked police interceptor vehicles per equipment replacement schedule City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Toc MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: August 5, 2013 City Council Minutes Correction Action Requested: Authorize correction to August 5, 2013 City Council Minutes. Information / Background: A, � f� o e kb= �O Oil IHHF, Agenda Item #: IV. H. Action M Discussion ❑ Information ❑ I -discovered the August 5, 2013 City Council minutes did not reflect accurately the motion or discussion of the City Council. Currently they read: "There was discussion on the current Planning Commission vacancy, noting that Michael Fischer would be willing to fill the remainder of the term. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the appointment of Michael Fischer to the Planning Commission for the remainder of the term of Jeffrey Carpenter. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried." In reviewing the video from the meeting, the motion should have read, Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the appointment of Michael Fischer to the Planning Commission until February 2014 when a replacement for the remainder of the term will be selected. If the Council desires to make this correction, I will put a strike - through correction into the written minutes annotating the date of the correction. City of Edina City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Temporary 3.2 Beer License Our Lady of Grace Church o U) WKS Agenda Item #: IV. I. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Adopt a motion granting a temporary beer license to Our Lady of Grace Church for their Lenten Fish Fry on March 21, 2014. Information / Background: Our Lady of Grace Church has applied for a temporary beer license for a Lenten Fish Fry to be held Friday, March 21, 2011. Edina Code Section 4 -26 (b) (1) allows non - profit organizations to obtain a temporary beer license to sell 3.2 beer on -sale for this type of event. Our Lady of Grace has filed the necessary application and insurance certificate as well as paid their fee. They have held similar events in the past and obtained a temporary license each time. Their previous events were held without any incident. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: 2014 -2015 Bargaining Unit Contract for Police Officers IN O E? Cn ��CnRPORf'�� 1888 Agenda Item #: IV. J. Action Discussion ❑ Information, ❑ Action Requested: Approve the 2014 -2015 Union Contract for MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 Representing: Police Officers. Information / Background: The tentative agreement for this bargaining unit includes the following changes from the previous contract: • A two —year agreement (2014 - 2015). • A 2% increase effective 1 -1 -2014, and a 2.5% increase effective 1 -1 -2015. • A change to a flat $8.00 per hour increase for.police officers in the Acting Supervisor role. The differential pay previously varied by years of service and was difficult to administer with electronic timecards. • Allow police officers to be eligible for advance resignation notice policies under the same terms as non -union employees. Attachments: • Tentative Agreement between City of Edina and Teamsters Local 320: Police Officers • 2012 -2013 Previous Labor Agreement between The City of Edina and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employee Union Local 320: Representing Police Officers City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 TENTATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN_ THE CITY OF EDINA AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320: POLICE OFFICERS January 2014 PROPOSED CHANGES 1. Article XVI. Working Out of Classification. . Proposed language: Employees assigned by the Employer to serve as an "Acting Supervisor" will receive an additional $8.00 per hour. Discussion: The City proposes to move to a flat dollar amount for acting sergeant pay to ease payroll administration for electronic timecards. 2. Article XXVII. Duration. This Agreement shall be effective January 1, 2014, except herein noted, and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31" day of December 2015. 3. Appendix A Wage Rates for 2014 and 2015. • Increase of 2% to steps on 1 -1 -2014. • Increase of 2.5% to steps on 1 -1 -2015. 4. MOU: Advance Resignation Notices. Add the following Memorandum of Understanding Memorandum Of Understanding ADVANCE RESIGNATION NOTICE POLICY Effective January 1, 2014 — December 31, 2015 Members of the bargaining unit will be eligible to participate in the department's pilot advance resignation notice program as it may be amended from time to time on the same basis as for nonunion members of the police department. S. Outdated Language Clean up. The HR Director and Business Agent will work together to clean up outdated references in the contract. LABOR AGREEMENT between CITY OF EDINA and MINNESOTA TEAMSTERS PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 Representing: Police Officers January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013 � ^ INDEX - ARTICLE '' PAGE . ^ ` � _ PURPOSE OF EE _,-..~---.,-------.----''--.1 11 ----------.1 III --.--------.1 �� EMPLOYER ----------.2 V E ----.-_----.2 V1 VII................................. 3 V1U .------------_--_-5 �Ix -----.------------6 XD....................................... .......... - .............................. 6 xi--.------.---_-----..7 ��| ................................................. _'--__-__---.7 xill OVERTIME `. . ..---.-------.-_-_---.---___--.7 XIV COURT TlM ND Y-..--------.-----------_-.---8 XV.----`.-----^----.-----.---'---..8 XVI \8/OFKINK3.OUTOF CLASSIFICATION ..................................................... 0 XVI| INSURANCE ................................................................................................ 9 XVIiI UNIFORMS - -'-,---.-_-----.----.--.---.---._----..9 X3X INJURY ON DUTY ..................................................................................... 9 Xx LONGEVITY ...... ..�...................................................................................... 9 XXI � VACAJ'ION-.. ............ XXQ SEVERANCE PAY ...................................................................................... 1O xxill ' SICK LEAVE WITH PAY.= ........................................................................ XXIV HOLIDAYS ------.---.-^.--_-----------------11 XXV EMPLOYEE FITNESS ......................................................... 11 XXV1 P.O`S][ BOARD LICENSUF�E ................................................................ 11 xxv} ........................... t ............................. ....................... .................... 12 xxvqll DURATION ............ ............................ .................................................. 12 APPENDIX A------.----.---------------_------13 APPENDIX B-_-.....-_-------,-_-------------..14 MEMORANDUM OF []�� []I ............................................... 15 MEMORANDUM {�F -UNDERSTANDING ''--------_.-------1! ARTICLE I. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into as of January 1, 2012 between the City of Edina, hereinafter called the Employer, and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320,_Fiereinafter called the Union. It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to: 1.1 Establish procedures for `the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement's interpretation and /or application; and 1.2 Place in written form`` "the parties' agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the 'duration of',this agreement. ARTICLE II:'" RECOGNITION 2.1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 179A.03 Subdivision 14, for all police personnel in the following job classifications: Patrol Officer Detective 2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services for determination. ARTICLE III. DEFINITIONS 3.1 UNION: The Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320. 3.2 UNION MEMBER: A member of the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local No. 320. 3.3 EMPLOYEE: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit. 3.4 DEPARTMENT: The Edina Police Department 3.5 EMPLOYER: The City of Edina 3.6 CHIEF: The Chief of the Edina Police Department 37 DETECTIVE: An employee specifically assigned by the Employer to the job classification and /or job position of Detective. 3:8 OVERTIME: Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of the employe'e's scheduled shift. 1 3.9 SCHEDULED SHIFT: A consecutive work.period including rest breaks and a lunch break. 3.10 REST BREAKS: Periods during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on continual.duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.11 LUNCH BREAK: A period during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on.,continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties. 3.12 STRIKE: Concerted action in failing to report to dutj,'the willful absence from one's position, the stoppage of work, slow -down, or abstinence in whole or in 'paft from the full, faithful and proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of. inducing, influencing or coercing a change "in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges or.obligations of employment. , . ARTICLE IV., EMPLOYER SECURITY The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement that the Union will not cause, encourage, participate in or .support any strike, slow -down, or other interruption of or interference with the normal function of the Employer. ARTICLE V. EMPLOYER AUTHORITY .5.1 The Employer retains full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all manpower, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs, to set and amend budgets; to determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct, and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules, and to perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement. 5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish or eliminate. ARTICLE VI. UNION SECURITY 6.1 The Employer shall deduct from the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing an amount necessary to cover monthly Union dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed by the Union. 6.2 The Union may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and. an alternate and shall inform. the Employer in writing of such choice and changes _in.the position of steward and /or alternate. 6.3 The Employer shall make .space- available on the employee bulletin board for posting Union notice(s) and announcement(s). 6.4 The Union agrees to indemnify.and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims, suits, orders, or judgment brought or issued against the Employer as a 2 result of any action taken or not taken by the' Employer under the provision of this article. 6.5 The Employer shall prepare a letter to be given to each new employee. The letter shall describe the employee's responsibility under Section 179A.06, Subd.3. ARTICLE VII. EMPLOYEE RIGHTS - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 7.1 DEFINITION OF GRIEVANCE A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.2 UNION REPRESENTATIVE The Employer will recognize Representatives designated by the Union as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities established by this Article. The Union shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of such Union Representatives and their successors when so designated as provided by 6.2 of this Agreement. 7.3 PROCESS OF A GRIEVANCE It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and responsibilities of the Employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved Employee and a Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal working hours provided that the Employee and the Union Representative have notified and received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer. 7.4 PROCEDURE Grievances, as defined by Section 7.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the following procedure: Step 1. An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement shall, within twenty -one (21) calendar days after alleged violation has occurred, present such grievance to the Employee's supervisor as designated by the Employer. The Employer- designated representative will discuss and;give an answer to such Step 1, grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved`in.Step 1 and appealed. to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the . grievance, the facts on which it is based; the provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, the remedy requested; and shall be appealed in writing to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the Employer- designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 2. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with the Employer- designated Step 2 representative. The Employer- designated representative shall give the Union the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer- designated representative's final Step 2 answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the UNION and discussed with the Employer- designated Step 3 representative. The Employer - designated representative shall give the Union the Employer's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer- designated representative's final answer in Step 3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived. Step 3 -A. If the grievance is not resolved at Step 3 of the grievance procedure, the parties, by mutual agreement, may submit the matter to mediation with the Bureau of Mediation Services. Submitting the grievance to mediation preserves timelines for Step 3 of the grievance procedure. Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 and appealed to Step 4 by the Union shall be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations Act of 1971. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the "Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Public Employment Relations Board. 7.5 ARBITRATOR'S AUTHORITY A. The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Union, and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted. B. The arbitrator shall be without the power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union and shall be based solely on the 4 arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to the facts of the grievance presented. C. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne equally by the Employer and the Union provided that each party shall be responsible for compensating its own representative and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for-the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings, the cost shall be shared equally, 7.6 WAIVER If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered "waived If a grievance is not appealed to the next step` within the specified time limit or any agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified time limits, the Union, may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately appeal he grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual written agreement of the Employer and the Union in each step. 7.7 CHOICE OF REMEDY If, as a result of the written Employer response in Step 3, the grievance remains unresolved, and if the grievance involves the suspension, demotion, or discharge of an employee who has completed the required probationary period,, the grievance may be appealed either to Step 4 of Article'Vll or a procedure such as: Civil Service, Veteran's Preference, or Fair Employment. If appealed to any procedure other than Step 4 of Article VII, the grievance is not subject to the arbitration procedure as provided in Step 4 Article VII.'The aggrieved employee shall indicate in writing which procedure is to be utilized -- Step 4 of Article VII or another appeal procedure -- and shall sign a statement of the effect that the choice of any other hearing precludes the aggrieved employee from making a subsequent appeal through Step 4 of Article VII. ARTICLE VIII. SAVINGS CLAUSE This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota and the City of Edina. In the event any provision of this Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken within the time provided, such provision shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provisions 'may be renegotiated at the written request of either party. ARTICLE IX. SENIORITY 9.1 Seniority.: shall be determined by the employee's length of continuous-employment with the Police Department and posted in`an appropriate location. Seniority rosters may be, maintained by the Chief on the basis of time in grade and time within specific classifications. 9.2 During the probationary period a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharged at the sole discretion of the Employer. During the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee may be replaced in his previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer. 9.3 A reduction of work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. Employees shall be recalled on the basis of seniority. An employee.on layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two years of the, time of his layoff before any new employee is hired. 9.4 Senior employees will be given preference with regard to transfer, job classification assignments and promotions when the job- relevant qualifications of employees are equal. 9.5 Senior, qualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference after eighteen (18) months of continuous full -time employment. 9.6 One continuous vacation .period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until March 15th of each calendar year. ARTICLE X. DISCIPLINE 10.1 The Employer will discipline for just cause only. Discipline will be in one or more of the., following forms: a) oral reprimand; b) written reprimand; C) demotion; d) suspension with or without pay; or e) discharge 10.2 Suspensions, demotions and discharges will be in written form. 10.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee. Employees and the Union will receive a copy of such reprimands and /or notices. 10.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at. reasonable times under the direct supervision of the Employer. 10.5 Discharges will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay. 0 10.6 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of disciplinary action unless the employee has been given an opportunity: to have a Union representative present at such questioning., 10.7 Grievances relating to this Article shall be :,initiated by the Union in Step 3 of the. grievance procedure under Article VII. ARTICLE XI. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by' the United States and Minnesota State Constitutions. ARTICLE XII WORK SCHEDULES 12.1 The normal work year is two thousand and eighty hours (2,080) to be accounted for by each employee through: a) hours worked on assigned shifts; b)' holidays; c) assigned training; d) authorized leave time 12.2 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a minimum or maximum number of hours the Employer may assign employees. ARTICLE XIII. OVERTIME 13.1 Employees will be compensated atone and one -half (1 -1/2) times the employee's regular base pay rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes of shifts`do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article. 13.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable. 13.3 Overtime refused by employees will, for record purposes under Article 13.2, be considered as unpaid overtime worked. 13.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be pyramided, compounded or paid twice for the same hours worked. 13.5 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest fifteen (15) minutes. 13.6 Employees have the obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested by the Employer unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working. 13.7 Those employees who are scheduled and work on New Year's Day, President's Day, Easter, Memorial Day, 4th of July, Labor Day, Veteran's Day, Thanksgiving Day, the day after Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day, 1/2 day on Christmas Eve, and 1/2 day.on New Year's Eve, shall receive one and one -half (11/2) times their regular rate.of pay for. the time worked. ARTICLE XIV. COURT TIME /STANDBY 14.1 An employee who is required to appear in court during their scheduled off.duty time shall receive a minimum--6 f two (2) hours pay at one and one -half (11/2) times the employee's base pay rate. If the court appearance is during the employee's off duty time and the court appearance is canceled, the employee will be given a forty -eight (48) hour notice of cancellation. If notification of cancellation is not given in the forty -eight (48) hour time frame, the employee will receive two (2) hours pay at one and one -half (11/2) times the employee's regular pay rate. An extension early report to a. regularly- scheduled shift for court appearance does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hour minimum. 14.2 Proper notification of court cancellation will consist of a court cancellation notice being placed in the officers mail slot. The notice will be stamped with the date and time it is placed in the officer's mail slot; thereby constituting proper notification if prior to forty. =eight (48) hours of the court assignment time. It will be the officer's responsibility to ascertain if he /she has received_a cancellation notice. 14.3 An employee who is required to appear in court during his /her scheduled off -duty time on the same day as that on which he /she completes a 1800 - 0600 shift shall be paid. at he,rate of two (2) times the employee's base pay rate. This shall apply only to employees working the 1800 - 0600 shift as part of the regularly assigned schedule. 14.4 Employees required by the Employer to standby shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at one and one -half (11/2) times the employee's base pay rate. Employee's required by the Employer to standby during his /her off -duty time on the same day as that on which he /she comp_ letes a 1800- 0600 shift shall receive a minimum of two (2) hours pay at the rate of two (2) times the employee's base pay rate. After the two (2) hour minimum has been reached, employees shall be paid at the rate of one (1) hour pay for each - additional hour on standby. Proper notification of court cancellation for standby shall be specified in Article 14.2. ARTICLE XV. CALL BACK TIME An employee who is called to duty during his /her scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one -half (11/2) times the employee's base pay - rate. An extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the three (3) hour minimum. ARTICLE XVI. WORKING OUT OF CLASSIFICATION Employees assigned by the Employer to assume the full responsibilities and authority of a higher job classification shall receive, effective January 1, 1991, the highest salary step of the higher classification for the duration of the assignment. ARTICLE XVII. INSURANCE The bargaining unit will receive an employer contribution equivalent to that amount approved for all other employees. ARTICLE XVIII. UNIFORMS Uniform iterris in current use will be replaced as needed. Uniform items are those currently purchased by the Employer and excludes personal gear. Authorizations for additional-new equipment-rests exclusively with the Employer. ARTICLE XIX. INJURY ON DUTY Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the Employer and thereby rendered unable to work for the Employer will be paid the difference between the employee's normal net take home. pay (i.e. regular salary less mandatory deductions) and Worker's Compensation insurance payments for: a period not to exceed seven hundred and twenty hours (720) per injury, not' charged) to the employees vacation, sick leave or other accumulated paid benefits, after a forty hours (40) initial waiting period per injury. The forty hours (40) waiting period shall be charged to the employee's sick leave account less Workers Compensation insurance payments applicable to those days. ARTICLE XX. LONGEVITY Effective July 1, 1978, the following terms and conditions are effective: 20.1 After four (4) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid three and one - quarter percent (3.25 %) of the employee's base rate. 20.2 After seven (7) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of five and one - quarter percent (5.25°/x) of the employee's base rate. 20.3 After ten (10) years of continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of seven and one - quarter percent (7.25 %) of the employee's base rate. 20.4 After thirteen (13) years of, continuous employment each employee shall be paid supplementary pay of nine and one -half percent (9.50 %) of the employee's base rate. ARTICLE XXI. VACATION 210 The following minimum vacation schedule shall apply to job classification covered by this Agreement: 0 =5 years of service - 80 hours per year 6 -10 years of service - 120 hours per year Over 10 years of service - eight additional hours per year not to exceed one hundred sixty eight hours. 21.2 Employees may reduce their vacation balance by cashing out a maximum of forty (40) hours per calendar year. 21.3 Effective 1 -1 -13, employees will be able to accrue a maximum of 480 hours of vacation leave. Once'the maximum level of vacation is reached, additional leave will not be accrued until the balance falls ' below the maximum accrual level. Unused vacation leave, up to the maximum balance of 480` hours will be paid to employees who leaven good standing upon termination of employment. The first year of employment, new employees will be allowed to carry a negative balance of vacation to a maximum of -80 hours. 21.4 Transition to New Cap In November, 2012, employees who have more.than the maximum accrual -will be allowed to cash out up to 40, hours of vacation at the current base rate of pay. This is in addition to leave cashed out under 21'.2. In January, 2013 any amount of vacation over two hundred (200) hours will be placed into an "Excess Vacation Accrual Account ". This is a one -time transfer. Employees will not be able to add any vacation to the EVAA after January, 2013. The balance in the EVAA will be reflected on the employee's pay stub and can be used in the following ways: Vacation or sick leave in one -hour increments. In November of each year, employees will have the option of cashing out up to 40 hours of vacation leave at their current base rate of pay. The City Manager may allow a higher number for all employees, based on City finances. Any remaining balance at termination will be cashed out at the current base rate of pay for employees who leave in good standing. ARTICLE XXII. SEVERANCE PAY Employees who voluntarily leave employment with the City of Edina with two (2) weeks notice, and who have completed ,at least twenty (20) years of continuous employment with the City, shall receive six (6) weeks of pay upon such termination. A person may only receive one severance payment from the City. ARTICLE XXIII. SICK LEAVE WITH PAY 23.1 Employees shall accrue sick leave, at the rate of eight (8) hours per month. There is a maximum accumulation of nine hundred and sixty (960) hours. 23.2 Employees may reduce their sick leave balance one hundred twenty hours (120) 10 to provide leave time in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. 23.3 Unused Sick Leave Sick leave will accrue eight (8) hours per month to a maximum of 960 hours. On an annual basis, (January 1 to December 31) 25% of all hours of unused sick leave above 960 hours may be placed in an account that may be used and scheduled like vacation. Time from the unused sick leave account may be used only when it is not detrimental to the Employer. The maximum amount of'u nused sick tim&7an employee can use annually is three twenty -four (24) hours. There is no banking,or accruing the time in the unused sick leave account; all time placed in the account must be used before, the end of the `year in which the time. was. placed in" the account: All accounts will be cleared on December 31st of each. year. Employees whose sick leave balances drop below 960 hours are not eligible for this provision of the contract. 23A Employees hired prior to January 1, 2000 can rebid. Employees hired prior to January 1, 2000 will have thirty (30) days after the contract has been signed to decide as to what sick leave policy they would like to participate in. Once the employee's decision is made, it will be final. (See new City policy on sick time.) ARTICLE XXIV. HOLIDAYS 24.1 Employees shall receive eighty -eight (88) hours each year. Employees have holidays calculated in the setting of their schedules. 24.2 For the purposes of this Article and Article 13.7 the holiday commences at 0000 hours the day of the official day and terminates at 2359 hours the day of the holiday. 24.3 All employees working a 5 -2 or 4 -3 schedule shall receive eight (8) hours floating holiday time for their use, which shall be scheduled by them in the same manner as - vacation. ARTICLE XXV. EMPLOYEE FITNESS INCENTIVE 25.1 Eligibility for the employees fitness incentive shall be based upon the City of Edina's Police Fitness Program dated January 1, 1994. Employees eligible for the fitness incentive shall receive not more than $625.00 per year to' be applied to the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. In no event shall the amount of the incentive paid exceed the actual cost of the dues, fees or program costs. Eligible employees shall receive the fitness incentive in not more than two (2) payments to be issued within three (3) weeks after submission to the Employer of evidence required by the Fitness Incentive Program. ARTICLE XXVI. P.O.S.T. BOARD LICENSURE The City will pay the P.O.S.T. license fee for all employees covered by this contract. ARTICLE XXVII. WAIVER 27.1 Any and all prior agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules and regulations regarding terms and. conditions of employment, to, _the extent inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded. 27.2 The parties mutually acknowledge'that during the negotiations which result in this Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect.to any term:or condition of employment not removed by-law from bargaining. All agreements .and understandings arrived at by the, parties are set forth in writing in this Agreement for the stipulated duration of this Agreement: The Employer and the Union each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waivers the right to meet and negotiate. regarding any and all terms a'nd. conditions of employment referred to or covered 'by this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been. within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time this contract was negotiated or executed. ARTICLE XXVIII: DURATION This Agreement shall be effective January 1, 2012, except herein noted, and shall remain in full force and effect until the 31st day of December, 2013. In) itne s thereof, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this �i%v of / I , 2012. i \�__ 1) %(C, V_JW 12 FOR TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 . 1��IL &�� Buslog,sp Agent rd rd 1. WAGE RATES FOR 2012 and 2013. 2. Employees classified or assigned as a Field Training. Officer shall receive $5.00 pet hour (while performing the duties of Field Training Officer) in addition to their regular wages for 2012 and 2013. 3. Employees assigned as Training Officer, School Liaison, Detective or Narcotics Officer shall receive $375.00 per month in addition to their regular wages in 2012 and 2013. 13 January 1, 2012 (2 %) January 1, 2013 (2 %) ' Start $52,598:06 $53,650.03 Year 1 $56,090.54 $57,212:35 Yearn $63,102.06 $64,364.10 ear 3 $70,113.36 $71,5T5.63 Year 4 $71,515.63 $72,945.95 Year 5 $72,1,65.92 $73,609.24 2. Employees classified or assigned as a Field Training. Officer shall receive $5.00 pet hour (while performing the duties of Field Training Officer) in addition to their regular wages for 2012 and 2013. 3. Employees assigned as Training Officer, School Liaison, Detective or Narcotics Officer shall receive $375.00 per month in addition to their regular wages in 2012 and 2013. 13 /_1,:j' :`17 Assignment Eligibility Selection Process Term After Assignment Rotational 5 years ..Letter of Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications. Qualifications are based on Return to a uniformed.patrol shift fora minimum period Investigator -with- E.P.D. acceptable performance records, as determined by management. year 3 y of one year prior to being eligible to select another non Seniority considered.when qualifications are equal. patrol ".position. May submit for the traffic or flex annual, Preference will be given to qualified officers who have not previously worked this assignment. position without returning to patrol. Letter of. Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications._ :.Qualifications are based on Return to a uniformed patrol shift for a minimum period Training 5 years acceptable, performance records; as determined by management. 2 year of one- year,prior to being eligible to select another non Officer with E.P.D. Seniorit considered when ualifications are a ual. y q q patrol position. May submit for the traffic orflex annual Preference will be given to qualified officers who have not previously worked -this. assignment. position without returning to patrol. School Letter of Interest. Return to a uniformed patrol shift for a minimum period Resource 5 years E.P.D. Interview panel consisting of school staff and administration. e ' 3 +year of one year prior to being eligible to select another non Officer with Preference will be given to qualified officers who have not previously worked this assignment patrol position. May submit for the traffic or flex annual - position without returning to patrol. Traffic Officer 5 years Letter.of Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications. Qualifications are based on May resubmit forthe same position annually not to (1 Position) With E.P.D. acceptable performance - records; as determined by management. 1 year exceed7 year time period away from a.uniformed patrol Seniority considered when qualifications are equal. shift. May submit for:otheropen rotational positions. Letter of Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications. Qualifications are based on Return to a uniformed patrol shift for a minimum period Traffic Officers 5 years acceptable performance; records, as determined bymanagement. of one yearpnor to being eliglble;to select another nom 2 Positions ( ) with E.P.D. Seniority considered when qualifications are equal. .'Preference will'be given to qualified officers who have not worked this assignment since January 3 year patrol position May submiCfor =the traffic or flex annual 01", 2008. position without returning to patrol. Commercial Crime (Flex — 5 years. Letter of Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications. Qualifications are based on acceptable performance May resubmit for the same position annually, hot to 7 One position) p ) with E.P.D. . records, as deternined'by "management. 1 year exceed year time period away.from a uniformed patrol shift. May submit for other open rotational positions. Seniority considered when qualifications are equal. Commercial Letter of Interest. Selection by seniority and qualifications. Qualifications are based on acceptable performance records, as determined by management. Return to a uniformed patrol shift for a minimum period Crime (Flex - 5 years Seniority considered when qualifications are equal. 3 year of one year priorto being eligible to select another non One position) with E.P.D. Preference will' be given to qualified officers who have not worked this assignment since January` patrol;positlon. Mayatibmit for the traffic or flex annual 01 d, 2008. position without, retuming•to,patrol. • Management retains the right to control personnel allocation as outlined In Article 5.1 of the union labor agreement. • The maximum number of years an officer can work a non - patrol position of any capacity is 7 years. After 7 years, an officer must return to a uniformed. patrol shift for a minimum period of one year before being eligible to bid another non - patrol position... An officer will not be considered eligible for a rotational position if the term of the position would exceed the 7 year leave'from a uniformed patrol shift. • Officers currently working,anyof the assignments in 201.1 will complete the original term prior to any particular position becoming open for selection. •- This agreement will commence on 01 /01/2012 and remain in affect for the duration of the contract agreement, at which time this agreement will be reviewed and negotiated. The term of the SRO position maybe extended for an additional, year (maximum 4 years) if there are some type of extenuating circumstances and special request from the school district 14 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between the CITY OF EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT and'the TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 on behalf of the POLICE OFFICERS The following Letter of Agreement is made between the City of Edina and Team_ sters Local '320. WHERE AS, the City of Edina Police Department and Teamsters Local 320 are in agreement to the following: 1. That the City allow employees to participate in a Post Retirement Health Insurance Plan through the Minnesota State Retirement System. 2. That participation will be done through severance and sick time pay. FURTHERMORE, the City of Edina and Teamsters Local 320 agree this will be retroactive to January 1, 2012. FOR THE CITY: FOR THE UNION: BY BY v�(. D City anager Business AgiAt Date . y_- / / 2701 Z� Date 3 — d-6 - 3 G 1 �k- 15 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT between CITY OF EDINA. and' MINNESOTA TEAM STERS "PUBLIC and LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL NO. 320 Statement of Purpose The Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) is a program that allows City of Edina regular fulltime employees to set aside their severance benefit into an account to pay medical expenses aild /or health insurance premiums after they are no longer employed by the City. Employees can choose between investment options provided by the plan Administrator. Assets in the account accumulate tax -free and, since payouts are used for qualified medical expenses, they reiilain tax - free. Eligibility The City of Edina and the Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union Local 320 agree that members in the Police Officer Bargaining Unit will participate in the City's Health Care Savings Plan outlined as follows: Program Severance payments upon termination of employment will be used to limd the HCSP. • Employees with less than live years of service do not contribute to the HCSP. • For all employees with five or more years of service participation in tine HCSP is mandatory. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused sick leave at termination of employment must contribute 100% of the sick leave portion of their severance to the FICSP. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused vacation at termination must contribute 100% of the vacation portion of their severance to the HCSP account. • Employees eligible to receive a severance payment for unused time in their Excess Vacation Accrual Account (EVAA) at termination must contribute 100% of the I! VAA portion of their severance to the HCSP account. • Employees eligible to receive sir weeks or severance pay at termination instead of payment for sick leave must contribute the entire six weeks of severance payment to their HCSP account. • In sonic cases. current law or IRS guidelines may allow an employee to opt-out of this program. Lmployecs may not opt out ofor otherwise be considerccl inclit,iblc to contribute to the FIC:'SP except as perniitted by law and approved by the City's Plan Ad1111mStratOr (MSRS). , SUCII election to WalVe participation is irrevocable. Page I of 2 FOR THE CITY O -DINA Z: Scott Neal, ty Manager City of )Al ,l j IJ Lisa Schae ei•, I-IR Dir t r Date: `4 -�A— 1 "�- Page 2 of 2 I.OR TEAMSTE S LOCAL. #320 Aikearey, 13usine gent Teamsters local 320 Un'r6ii Steward Date: v -30 - go /.,I- To: Mayor and Council From: Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator Date: Feb. 18, 2013 Subject: January "Speak Up, Edina" Report o Le Vtz�' y •'n�bRfORAT�O• IBB© Agenda Item #: V. C. Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Action Requested: Receive report on January 2014 "Speak Up, Edina" discussion aboutfood trucks. Information / Background: Since June 2012, the City of Edina has used the online engagement website, www.SpeakUpEdina org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. The site was used heavily during the "Name Your Neighborhood" initiative in 2012 and early 2013 and residential redevelopment ordinance changes. One of the City Council's six strategic priorities for 2014 -2015 is Communication and Engagement: "To clearly understand community needs, expectations and opinions, the City will consistently seek the input of a broad range of stakeholders in meaningful and interactive communication." A goal of that is to host a monthly discussion on www.SpeakUp.Edinaorg. City Manager Scott Neal has selected topics for monthly discussions for the first half of the year. In January 2014, the discussion topic centered on food trucks. In this online discussion, the City posed the following questions: • Currently, City Code does not allow food trucks in Edina Would you support food trucks? Why or why not? • Should there be protections in place for brick - and - mortar business against food trucks? If so, what? • If food trucks were allowed, should they be restricted in certain areas of the City? Where would you like to see them? • Should the City limit the number of licenses available every year? Why or why not? • When should food trucks be allowed? Only during summer events, all year, or something else? What about time of day? The discussion was open for comments between Dec. 29, 2013 and Feb. 1, 2014. During that time, 99 comments were made. Additionally, 1,121 people visited the site 1,547 times, garnering 6,591 page views. Of all the visitors to the site duringthat period, 67 percent were new visitors to the site. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The discussion was promoted through various means, including a press release, Facebook and Twitter posts and City Extra messages. In addition, the Communications & Technology Services. Department reached out to organizations that might be interested in the topic, such as the Edina Chamber.of Commerce, 50th & France Professional & Business Association, Minnesota Restaurant Association and Minnesota Food Truck Association. The discussion gained traction, being posted online in places such as CityPages "'Hot Dish Blog" about the regional restaurant scene, Minnesota Business Magazine blog, Edina Patch and posted in the Edina Sun Current. More than two dozen tweets were cast by various accounts and retweeted or shared 39 times, encouraging people to weigh in on the discussion. Most notably, the discussion was posted to Twitter by SJF Material Handling (57,300 followers); CityPages (39,900 followers) and host of the Travel Channel's "Bizzare Foods," Andrew Zimmern (662,000 followers). The aggregate total of followers of all Twitter accounts that tweeted about the discussion is about 794,000. The Results Conversation on the City's "Speak Up, Edina!" site and on external sources were mixed. More people were generally supportive than against of the idea of allowing food trucks, but with some restrictions, such as location. Below are some summarized arguments and comments surrounding the different sides of the issues. G Pro Food Trucks • Fun way to get residents out and about. • Lunch and dinnertime alternatives. • Helps support the entrepreneurial feel and spirit of Edina. • Employees would be able to reach a greater diversity of food without leaving work, especially for those with busy schedules. o Food trucks will attract people to areas and increase sales in businesses, including restaurants. o Less formal, less expensive. • They are a valuable asset to a community, bringing families and individuals to the community. • Customer is the ultimate voter with their pocketbooks. • Businesses don't like competition, but consumers like options. • Edina should build on existing systems, like those of Minneapolis; Madison, Wis.; Portland Ore. and Chicago. • Not worried about taking business away from brick and mortar restaurants. If food trucks" make better - tasting food than sit -down restaurants, it'd force restaurants to "up their game. • I enjoy the fresh air and scenery at 50th & France over the lunch hour, without breaking the bank to go to a sit -down restaurant. o Don't live or work in Edina, but would probably spend more time and money in the city if food trucks were part of the equation. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 • Food, trucks are a great, easy, low stress way to expose my:two children to new and different options, and area nice treat for adults, too. • When I want to enjoy a nice, sit -down dinner, I'd choose a brick and mortar place, regardless of whether or not there were food trucks right-outside. But when I want a quick bite to eat, then my choices are limited to fast food or food trucks. Does Taco Bell really compete with Rice Paper? They both offer two totally different dining experiences. • I don't think foodtrucks would cut into out sit -down restaurant time, only our consumption of less healthy fast food. • Is there a compelling reason to ban food trucks? No, there is not. We wouldn't ban paper bag lunches to protect restaurants. We don't need to create barriers. Allow capitalism to work. • Edina has many outdated laws that reinforce the "snooty suburb" stereotype it often gets. Change! • If 50th & France has congestion issues, it's more due to poor decisions regarding traffic signals and turn lanes. Eliminating all turns at 50th & France is a more logical response than allowing restaurants to use the issues to eliminate competition. • Food Truck Cons /Concerns o Food trucks take away business from brick and mortar restaurants that already operate in Edina. o Noisy, take away from ambiance of neighborhoods. o Food trucks generally take away from the communities they serve. o Imagine food trucks lined up along street, adding to the congestion of our already stressed transportation routes. o It sends a negative valuation message to existing brick and mortar restaurants. o 'Opposed, except for special events. Could cause unfair competition for established restaurants. o With food trucks, customers need adequate places to sit and discard trash. o Minneapolis' food truck situation leaves much to be desired. o Restaurants are vested and participate in community, pay taxes and offer atmosphere to our downtown area. • What will be the incentive for our current restaurants to continue operating if food trucks undercut them, or for new restaurants to open in Edina? There is not much incentive if someone can drop -in, ruin customer parking, the outside atmosphere in patio dining. • Invested a lot in my restaurant and it's already difficult to compete with the other restaurants at 50th & France. Food trucks are truly unfair, especially with their low cost of investment and overhead. • Unsightly, low- quality distraction and a hazard to the fluid movement of 50th & France. • I love to eat and love variety where I eat. However, I am opposed to food trucks. They are a fad. I am a firm believer in supporting our brick and mortar restaurants first. Edina has worked hard on its economic development. Food trucks would undermine existing businesses we have. 0 1 love food trucks, but they don't belong in suburbia as a permanent fixture. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 • Food trucks face refrigeration issues, raising the potential for food borne illnesses. • Minneapolis didn't think enough about limits on permits, proximity to brick and mortar restaurants, traffic congestion, sidewalk congestion, trash, noise pollution, smell of generators exhaust and strain on current tax paying restaurants. The same could happen in Edina. • Suggestions o Support, but would focus them in parts of the City where there is not already an abundance of food trucks, like corporate, school church or park -based events. 0 50th & France not a good location for food trucks since the area is already congested, but need to be where the people are. • In favor, but questions if food trucks would pay taxes like brick and mortar restaurants and would need to be considered. • Should be limited to areas where there are no existing restaurants. • Chicago limits food trucks to 300 feet of restaurants, and Portland concentrates all trucks in one parking lot to not harm brick and mortar restaurants. • Restrict to parks and special events. • Sit -down restaurants have to pay property taxes, and thus I feel they deserve a bit of protection in the form of a setback regulation, i.e. no food trucks within 1,000 feet of a brick and mortar. • City has obligation to protect its merchants, especially at 50th & France. • One idea taken from Evanston, III., is to only grant licenses to restaurants who already have a brick and mortar establishment. This would be a way to experiment with food trucks while respecting "our own." • Are there parks where we could designate a "food truck night" or "food truck Saturday" so there is parking plus a picnic area? • Food trucks should be zoned out of certain areas, like 50th & France, 44th & France and the area around Southdale. • They should be encouraged to compete against catering businesses. The following attachments are provided for your reference.: • Comments from "Speak Up, Edina!" • Twitter results • Minnesota Food Truck Association Call to Action • Ed inaEater.com article • Minnesota Business Magazine article • CityPages Blog and comments • Emailed responses to discussion • Comment from City Manager Scott Neal's Blog El + Discussions Sign Ideas Fail email address... Password--- - assmrd... ;sign In Like wTweet� Share This Discussion channels currently closed. r Discussion: Food Trucks Speak Up, E We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living; learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion.: It's "your chance to speak up, Edina[ ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas[. ► JOIN the discussion! The City is interested to find out how the coiimmity feels about food trucks. Note: Tbe'City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to the City Council as in6m, national only. 5 Topics 99 Answers Closed 2014 -02 -02 View Dscussion 0 Attachments Topic: Sbould food trucks be allowed? Currently, City Code does not allow food trucks in Edina. Would you support food trucks in Edina? Why or why not? 53 Responses 53 Responses I I Susan de Hone about 1 month ago - Yes, I think-it is a fun way to get residents out and about in the city byoffering alternative lunch and dinner tune options and to get people outside. Food trucks are entrepreneurial, which I feet is the spy of Edina. 2 Supports comment... Reply to susan de Hoog ❑1 Hein de Boo-- about 1 month ago I support any type of entrepreneurial endeavors. Food trucks are popular and fin. Lets not restrict either in Edina. 2 Supports comment... .Reply to Hein de Hoog Joel Stegner about I month ago Yes, but focus them on the parts of the city where there are not already an abundance of food outlets - or at corporate, school, church or park based events. f I Support comment... M n Clayton about 1 month ago Reply to Joel Stegner No ... I am with Parasol- Restaurant Holdings. We operate several restaurants in Edina. We are of the mind that food trucks take business away from the many brick and mortar restaurants that already operate in Edina. Edioa's current restaurants are first class and otlirr great diversity. I also believe the trucks tend to be noisy and take away from the ambiance of the neighborhoods. 4 Supports comment... Reply to Kip Clayton n Brian Tibal about1 month ago YES! I think this is a great idea. Employees would be able to reach a greater diversity of food without leaving work. Many are unable to leave work for a great hunch due to busy work schedules. Such a service would help employees enjoy a greater variety and more convenience. 3 Supports comment... i It- Dan Henrich about 1 month ago Reply to Brian Tibaldo YES! If done properly, I believe food trucks will attract people to areas and increase sales in businesses, including restaurants. There should be tarots on locations, hours and number. 1 Support comment... Reply to Don Henrich Kelly Streit about I month ago Yesl Food trucks are a fuln way for families to have dinner or lunch in a less formal and often less expensive venue. When we were in San Francisco last year, they have a Friday evening event called Off the Grid at a large parking lot in a park There are many food trucks and live music. It is a great event and would be great way to attract people to Edina. htro• 1 /oflthegridsfconrlmarkets/fort- mason - center 1 Support comment... Reply to Kelly Streit 0 Sarah Wuest about I month ago Yes! Food trucks are a valuable asset to a commmnity bringing families and individuals into the city. We were in Portland Oregon last year and were so impressed with the swaths of people purchasing from the multitudes of food trucks. It would be an excellent addition to Edina. 1 Support comment... Reply to Sarah Wuest a + Bruce I.anerord about 1 month ago I am I favor of food trucks in Edina... And I think we should have as few restrictions on them as possible until an obvious problem crops up. rm sure all the restaurants would be against this, but Minneapolis has been making it work, and so would we. This reminds nie of the issue of liquor in restaurants.... 1 Support 0& Jordan Gil- enbach admin about 1 month ago Bruce, interesting take. The City of Minneapolis has restrictions on where food trucks can and can't park in relation to restaurants or other vemles. Would you support those types of restrictions? 0 Supports Bruce tangfnrd about 1 month ago I think proximity to brick and mortar restaurants in the area around 50th and France is probably not such a great place for food trucks, especially with the traffic, but other than that, the food trucks need to be where the people are, and if that means within a few blocks of a restaurant, so be iL The customer is the ukimate voter with their pocketbook. 3 Supports comment... i comment... is Rin about month ago Repty to Jordan Gllgenbach Reply to Bruce Langford Yes, I thuilc food trucks in Edina would be a wonderful addition I live at Centennial Lakes Park and food trucks would offer new selections and a variety of food.11nere is very tittle available in the parks. This may bring more people to enjoy the parks as well. 2 Supports comment... i Cathy Bail ly about 1 month ago Reply to Lois Ring I am in favor, with some restrictions. Question, though, would they pay any city tax as brick and mortars do, or are we just removing revenue that would otherwise be supporting our city? 0 Supports i , Jordan G hmnbach adndn about t month ago Hi, Cathy! That is a good question. Currently, with this online discussion,'we are not proposing change, rather gathering resident feedback to present to the City CounciL If they so chose, they can have stafffutther research the topics and make a recommendation. Taxation would have to be seriously considered and handled in a formal recommendation and ordinance to be voted on by the City Council That being said, what would you prefer to see? 0 Supports continent... --- - - - - -- — i comment... i D Mlchoel Swanson about 1 month ago Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Cathy Ballly Yes. Cities Ike Portland OR have a fun and affordable food truck "culture ". Businesses don't Ike competition, but consumers (that's us the Edina residents) We options. Ede should build on the existing system that cities Ike Minneapolis are using for food trucks. Buen provecho. 2 Supports comment... i L� David Burlevabout 1 manthago Reply to Michael Swanson Food Trucks should be limited to areas of the city were theme are no existing restaurants. Chicago frmits its food trucks to 300' and Portland, Oregon concentrates all the trucks into one parking lot so as not to harm brick & mortar restau ants. Minneapolis limits to 100'- but there's discussion of increasing this and adding fiutber restrictions. Trucks shouldn't be allowed at 50th & France as we already bave a vibrant restaurant scene, and the city has recognized that the parking infrastructure is already steamed. 1Support comment... Reply to David Budey Alt] JimStramberg30 days ago Maybe at special events, or in parks where people might want to have a bite, but - in general - I think food tucks take away from the communities they serve. I certainly understand a worker in an office building wanting to get a fresh sandwich or something out in their parking lot, but images the food - trucks lined up along a city, street, adding to the congestion of our already stressed transportation routes - and - imagine the message we send to our 'bricks & mortar' places of business, who continue to work hard at staying afloat Ifwe have to have them, restrict them, please, to parks and special events. 1 Support comment... Reply to Jim Stromberg Gene Persha29 days ago Comment: I am strongly opposed to food trucks in any commercial or residential area except for special events. Food trucks are a warm weather phenomenon and could easily cause unfair competition for our established restaurants. We also do not need more vehicles clogging up the streets, parking lots and open spaces. Furthermore, with food trucks, customers need adequate places to sit and discard their trash. The food tuck situation in Minneapolis leaves much to be desired. We need to be careful with mobile commercialism Food tucks are only facet of this. 1 Support 9& Jordan OWenbach admin 28 days ago Thanks for your comments, Gene! The need for seating, even though the food trucks are mobile, is a good point 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to Gene Persha Jim Schedin 29 days ago I didn't know how Pd feel about food trucks until I experienced the lineup of them near the IDS center downtown. My own experience is that they offer a delightfid assortment of interesting foods, but are a bit spendier in order to covet their costs. I'm not too worried about them taking business away from the brick & mortars, because if they can make better tasting food than what is served at a sit down establishment, then it's going to force the sit down establishment to up their game. If the food trucks serve mediocre flood at high prices, then they won't be around for very long. Case in point: I've enjoyed really good food from food tucks, and I ve also had a mediocre meal or two (I won't be a repeat custonner at those food trucks). That being said, the sit downs do have to pay property taxes and thus I feel that they deserve a little bit ofprotection in the form of a setback regulation, ie. no food trucks within 1000' feet of a brick & mortar. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Jim Schedin Josh Ililleer 29 days ago I do not believe Edina should have food trucks in areas where we already have brick and mortar restaurants. These restaurants are vested and participate in the conrmmity, pay taxes and offer atmosphere to our downtown area The traffic is already too congested in areas like 50th and France and Centennial Lakes. What will be the incentive fDr our current restaurants to continue operating if they are undercut by flood trucks or fDr new restaurants to open in Edina? Frankly there is not any incentive if sorneone can drop -in, ruin customer parking, the outside atmosphere at patio tables and take away business for those that have invested in our commumity? 0 Supports aLl Jordan Cllgenbach admin 28 days ago Josh, thanks fur weighing in! That's in interesting point about outdoor patio seating at sit -down restaurants I hadn't thought of 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to Josh Hillger jl Susan Alton 28 days ago Yes! I think food trucks are a great ideal I work at 50th and France and many times I would Ike to enjoy die fresh air and scenery on my lunch hour without breaking the bank to go to a sit down restaurant. I think its a fin idea and will get more residents to venture out and try something different At least try it for a year. 1 Support SlacySolow15 days ago I also agree that it could be a year -by -year decision. If issues pop up, they can be solved, or the decision can be made not to renew the option the following year. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Stacy Solow comment... Reply to Susan Alton PIP Jordan Gileenhach adadn 25 days ago Below is a message I received from An Nguyen, owner of Rice Paper restaurant at 50th & France: As a restaurateur, I strongly oppose to the idea of allowing food trucks at 50 and France, and below are my reasons: My investment in Rice Paper as a brick and mortar restaurant is significant financially, emotionally and physically. Under normal daily circumstances, it is extremely diffrcu It just to compete and survive with the multitude of existing restaurants at 50th and France. To now be subjected to the possibility of competition from food trucks, which operate with a fraction of the investment and overhead as well as only maintain their presence in fair weather, is truly unfair. To maintain my restaurant, I'm required to pay nniltiple costly annual licensing fees, including one for outdoor seating, exorbitant rents and insurance premiums and an ongoing schedule ofrigorous, expensive maintenance costs both inside and out To allow food trucks presence, with operate on only a fraction of these costs is to allow an overwhelmmngly unfair competition with existing brick & mortar businesses. Last year Peter's Grill, one of the oldest restaurant anchors located in the heart of Minneapolis, was forced into closure due to the presence of tbod trucks. In spite of the fact that they may offer a range of ethnically interesting food, they are also unsightly and I feel are both a low quality distraction as well as a hazard to the fluid movement of traffic throughout the 50th & Frame shopping dot Had I know that there might be a strong possibility of food truck presence at 50th & France, I would quite likely have bad strong reservations about the moving there. In light of all these reasons, I feel that the city of Edina has an obligation to protect its merchants, especially in the 50th and France arena, which is heralds as one of the jewels of the cities economic fabric. Edina has a plethora of culturally interesting and fin aspects with plenty of diversity without the need to add these currently trendy independent novelties to its high quality shopping district. Most sincerely, An Nguyen, Owner Rice Paper Restaurant 2 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Codnn del Barrio 24 days ago Conu ercial refrigeration struggles after a certain temperature, which almost all trucks exceed if it is over 80 degrees outside. Raising the potential for foodbome tlhress. The city of Minneapolis rolled this out without thinking enough about lirrrits on permits, proximity to brick and mortar restaurants, traffic congestion that has occurred on Marquette due to heavy food truck concentration, side walk congestion, trash receptacles(even if trucks are to require to have their own trash for guests Marquette has overflowing city trash after hmch service), noise pollution, the smell of generator exhaust and strain on current tax paying brick and mortar restaurants. We echo the sentiments ofother restaurants on this page, we are NOT for the introduction of food trucks in Edina. Thank you. 1 Support comment... Reply to Cocina del Barrio We Christensen 21 days ago I support protecting our local businesses, including restaurants, fi-om competition. I like the idea that food trucks couldn't be close to brick and mortar restaurants. I think we should ban any new restaurants from opening within 1000 feet of any other restaurant. Or we could ban any new restaurants from ever opening again. That way, our current businesses wouldn't ever have to deal with competition. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Eric Christensen Anlly A 20 days ago I don't live or work in Edina. But I'd probably spend more of my time and money there if food trucks were part of the equation. I 0 Supports ,all Jordan Gilgentmch admin at January 27, 2014 at 8:59am CST Thanks for your comment, Emily! The 50th & France area prides itself in having very good restaurants and a unique shopping and dining experience. Do you think food trucks would make it less desirable, with the additional noise, smells, foot traffic, seating and/or garbage? 0 Supports comment... comment.. . -- Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Emily A Stacy Sol otiy 15 days ago I support food trucks in Edina. I have two small children so going to a bricks and mortar restaurant regularly isn't an option during the week. Food tricks are a great, easy, low stress way to expose them to new and different options, and a treat for adults too. I have no doubt that the majority ofpushback will come from restaurant owners. While I understand their position, ultirnately we can't insulate businesses from cornpetition, or there will be no growth Let consumers decide where they want to spend their food dollars. Restaurants must adapt and evolve to survive. Protecting them from new and innovative Pleas is not the answer. 0 Supports comment.. Reply to Stacy Solo, Jim Schedin at January 24, 2014 at 12:14pm CST One more thought about the perception that food trucks will compete with the brick & mortars: When I want to enjoy a nice sit down meal with an adult beverage at a relaxed pace, rd choose the sit down place every time. It wouldn't matter if there were several food trucks parked right in front of the sit down establishment. The goal is a nice, relaxing meal, regardless of the weather or other factors. But when I want to grab a quick bite without having to wait to be seated, waiting for the wait staffto greet me, bring me water, wait for the food, wait for the brill, etc, etc, then my choices are limited to fist food or food trucks. Tbat's why people will occasionally choose fast food over nice restaurants. Does a place like Taco Bell really compete with Rice Paper? Will food tricks (another form of fast food) who are required to be 'X" feet from a nice sit down brick & mortar really take away business? I don't think so, because they both oar two totally different food experiences, depending upon what the consumer has time for or wants to experience. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Jim Schedin Jim Schedin at January 24, 2014 at 1:12pm CST One more thought about the perception that food trucks will compete with the brick & mortars: Mien I want to enjoy a nice sit down meal with an adult beverage at a relaxed pace, I'd choose the sit down place every time. It wouldn't matter irthere were several food trucks parked right in front of the sit down establishment. Tire goal is a nice, relaxing meal, regardless of the weather or other factors. But when I want to grab a quick bite without having to wad to be seated, waiting for the wait staff to greet me, bring me water, wait for the food, wait for the bill, etc, etc, then my choices are limited to fist food or food trucks. That's why people will occasionally choose fast food over nice restaurants. Does a place like Taco Bell really compete with Rice Paper? Will food trucks (another form of fast food) who are required to be '7{" feet from a nice sit down brick & mortar really take away business? I don't thick so, because they both offer two totally different food experiences, depending upon what the consumer has time for or wants to experience. In other words, to argue that someone who was planning on a nice meal at Cocina Del Barrio could be hired away by a truck parked at the curb a block away selling brisket on a bun (and having to stand there on the sidewalk and eat it) is laughable. P AW Jordan Gthmnbach admin nt January 27, 2014 0t 8:582M CST Thanks for your comments, Jim You bring up some interesting points! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to Jim Schedin f A[T11 Utz at January 26, 2014 at 8:30pm CST I work in Edina and would love the option of food truck for breakfast or lunch. I also love having them present at festivals, sports tournaments and other events at local parks. A food truck business is the same as any other small business and should be allowed to do business same as other businesses. 1 Support comment... Reply to April t utz 7 Scott Busyn at January 26, 2014 at 10:23pm CST I petsonally like the entrepren uial spirit of food trucks. Plus, I love the food! That being said, we need to tnove slowly on this and make sure we respect the interests of those restaruants who have invested in the success of pour corrunamity. On idea taken 8-om Evanston, IL is to only grant licenses to those restaurants who already have a brick and mortar establishment in the city. This would be a way to experiment with food bucks while respecting "our own!" 0 Supports A-, Jordan Gilgenbach odmfn at January 27, 2014 at 9:00am CST Interesting idea, Scott! I wonder if any existing Edina restaurants would open a food truck if that licensing structure were adopted. Thanks for your comments! 0 Supports comment... i comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to Scott Busyn Will Cage Will One at January 27, 2014 at 12:25am CST Food trucks offer a diversity in menuus and provide new food ideas while giving customers an alternative choice. Many of these they may never see before or had the option to try. Food truck owners are new emerging entrepreneurs who want to do a great thing for the community & are local, talented chefs who can showcase their talents in a way that has not been traditionally available due to the expense of opening a brick & mortar establishment I Support comment... i Deb Wal(fi n at January 27, 2014 at 11:01 am CST Reply to Will Care Will Cave Food trucks would be a fim addition to Edina. I love the existing restaurants at 50(h, 44th and other areas but being able to brke to or dash out for a quick bite is just another choice I'd Ike to be able to make. America was built on entrepreneurs and competition is a way of life in any business. Evolve and change or .... dodt. Maybe the bricks and mortars need to add a take -out window that doesn't involve going into the restaurant Oust saying helmet hair from biking is not attractive). This could be an opportunity to grow their business, too, with some creative thinking. I say )xs" to food trucks! 1 Support comment... i i Pntrick Tinlev at January 27, 2014 at 11:02am CST I am not in favor ofFood Trucks in Edina. I agree with the points made by Josh Hillger.. 0 Supports comment ... i Tim Sat January 27, 2014 at 11:48am CST Reply to Deb Waldin Reply to Paldck Finley I LAVE to eat and love variety in where I eat Just check out Yelp and you'll see my reviews of local restaurants. However, I am opposed to have food trucks in Edina on a permanent basis. Food trucks are a fad. Granted, the image has changed about food trucks, but I am a firm believer of supporting all our brick - and - mortar businesses first. Edina has worked hard on its economic development, and without these businesses, we would look blighted. Or restaurant business would go to neighboring cities. Food trucks would undermine the established businesses we have. The other reason I am opposed to food trucks is we don't have a lot of room or parking space in certain areas. Food trucks would tie up precious real estate. However, at special events Ike the Centennial Lakes Arts Festival they are fine. People expect that I lice having food options, but we have plenty of great restaurants we should and need to support first. 0 Supports :omment... Reply to Tim S Dou -las Ilnder at January 27, 2014 at 12:30pm CST I am opposed to food trucks & think we need support the brick and mortar resturantes 0 Supports omment ... — -- — — Reply to Douglas.linder I%lgke 1; at January 27, 2014 at 12:51 pm CST Why did Edina ban food trucks in the fast place? There must have been specific reasons. Understanding that historical perspective would help me to consider what has changed since then in considering if trucks should now be allowed. 0 Supports Jordan Gileenbaeb udnJu etJuuuary 27, 2014 at 1:13pm CST Mike, thanks for your comment! To clarify, food trucks have been allowed to operate in the City in die past, but only in association with special events, like the Edina Art Fair, Fall into the Arts Festival, etc. This is an important distinction -- a food truck associated with an event vs. a food truck setting up somewhere 5 days a week for 6 months out of the year. That said, I can't speak on why they are not allowed altogether in the past 0 Supports :omment... omment... Reply to Jordan Gllgenbach Reply to Mike x Clauda Ftean at January 27, 2014 at 1:16pm CST Yes! I agree with most, here, highly congested areas are not the place for food trucks. I've been to food truck areas in Portland, OR, and think they would be a great addition to our community. In Portland, most trucks are permanently parked in parking lots close to park areas. I don't like the idea of permanent trucks but do think proximity to a park would be great for foodies and kmilies. What a great way to discover new foods! I would not have thought to enter an Ethiopian restaurant without having tried the cuisine from a food truck fast (I'm not that adventurous). To those worried about competition for our local restaurants, I thick most people will choose a quick food -truck meal or a restaurant. If not a food tuck, they are most likely to choose a drive -thru or grocery deli rather than a restaurant. Are there park areas where we could designate a food- truck -night or food - truck- Sunday so there is parking plus picnic area? It should be set on certain day(s) so we get commitrnent from well-run food trucks AND we can market the availability to residents and surrounding suburbs. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Claudia Eggan Mark Jnhrtcnn at January 27, 2014 at 9:35pm CST Yes. Food trucks can offer a more diverse cuisine that our current restaurants can offer and usually at a much more affordable price. It will also provide a reasonably priced option for people who work in Edna. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Mark Johnson Knte Hurlev at January 27, 2014 at 9:52pm CST Yesl What better way to encourage brick and mortar restaurants (along with other flood tricks and aspiring chefs) to think outside the box to create unique and inspiring dishes than to add a little competition to the area? I love food, be that from a food truck or a tried and true brick and mortar, but the more creative, the better. Nothing makes us better at our trail than learning from our competition and our peers! Brick and mortar chefs... Take note ofall the ingenious ideas coming out of food bucks these days! Bring them into your restaurants, and in tumi, bring in new customers! Plus... Is there anything more stimulating to the local economy than people who have just been wowed by some stellar cuisine? 3 Supports comment... Reply to Kate Hurley Amy Olson at January 28, 2014 at 8:55am CST Yes to food trucks. We are an active family that would love a diversity of food choices on- the -go. I do not think this would cut into our sit -down restaurant time, only our consumption of less healthy quick - service food. , 2 Supports :omment... Reply to Amy Olson Richard Perrine at January 28, 2014 at 1 :14pm CST No -robed many long tines restaurants in downtown Minneapolis 1 Support :omment... Reply to Richard Nnine Mlaa Santoni at January 28, 2014 at 5:09pm CST Yes but with restrictions. I would not want to see them at or near 50& France. There are plenty of other possible areas. 0 Supports :omment ... Reply to Hilary Santonl ❑1 ,Term Holguin at January 28, 2014 at 7:26pm CST I spent 9 years in Portland, OR and I'm quite familiar with food trucks. Love them! Great, inexpensive interesting ethnic food which would bring a little diversity to Edina. Gets working people outside and interacting with other working folks. It supports stall business and competition is always good for the customer. 2 Supports :omment ... Reply to Jeny_Holguin Andrew Armetrone at January 29, 2014 at 9:06pm CST 1 don't see a reason for them not to be there, having more choices for food in that area would be a great thing. Having more options over the Patasole overpriced/mediocre food is a brilliant idea. All in for the food truck. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Andrew Armstrong Lee Owens at January 30, 2014 at7:14tnn CST Would food trucks really make Edina a better place for living learning- raising krnv'lies and doing business? It is important to remember food trucks in Edina are die point ofdiscussion, not whether food trucks are good or bad in general Edina's has a unique business climate and city dynamic. This is not an easy place to do business Restaurants, bakeries and other food slops have huge expenses operating where land values and rent rates are high Some casualties of the expense include: 1. Ala In Candyland 2. Bissinger French Confections 3. Franklin Bakery 4. In Season (close by in Southwest Minneapolis) S. Pandoffi Candy Gelato & Gifts 6. Premiere Cheese Market 7. Tejas The low operating costs of food trucks would give them an advantage over year - round brick and mortar food venues. Please keep food trucks out of Edina, except for the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market where other temporary vendors set up shop. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Lee Owens Dan Atkins at January 31, 2014 at 9:26pm CST Compelling. That is the operative word here (as in much of government regulation). Is there a COMPELLING reason to ban food trucks? No. There is not. So the answer to your questions "Yes" allow them But the context of the question bothers me a little. It should not be about what Edina should "Allow'. Edina should not be about what it allows. Edina should be about the freedom do do what a person wants unless there is a compelling reason to ban it. But maybe this is another topic altogether. Back to the ban If we want to protect the Brick & Mortar businesses would we consider banning the brown paper bags we carry our lunches in? Of course not and banning food tricks is only slightly less ridiculous. Both brick & mortar and food trucks have competitive advantages. We don't need to creates barriers. Allow capitalism to work. Your vote should be to allow the residents workers to vote with their wallets. We have demonstrated that we are pretty good at it. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Dan Atkins Sign up Cormec Ismail address... Sign up Participants - U `peak U` x Horm i Discussions Sign • Ideas WM • Surveys Snail small address... Password sword... Sign In Like (_ Tweet Share I U Y , ow e,� >4 �y • ���erriaacu►'��� rt�Tn This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Food Trucks Speak Up, Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! The City is interested to find out how the community feels about food trucks. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to the City Council as informational only. 5 Topics 99 Answer; Gosed 20%02 -02 View Discussion 0 Attachments Topic: Protection for existing businesses. Should there be protection in place for brick- and - mortar businesses against mobile flood tucks? If so, what? 17 Responses 17 Responses Susan de Hone about 1 month ago I would be interested in hearing what benefits and concerns of existing Edina businesses there may be to having food tucks available in Edina. l would think that the novelty of having food trucks could drive more business to certain areas. 0 Supports a& Jordan Gilgenbach a&Wn about I month ago Susan, do you think allowing food trucks at 50th & France, for example, would give an unfair advantage against other restaurants in the area that are not mobile? 0 Supports comment... i comment... i Hein de How about 1 month ago Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach Reply to susan de Hoog No. Frequently'like" business' thrive more when there is a group of them to attract customers. Starbucks was allowed to open at Centennial lakes when there were two Caribous within two blocks. It's all good! 2 Supports 9& Jordan Gileenlnch admin about 1 mouth ago Hein, thanks for your comment! I'm going to play the devil s advocate. If you owned a restaurant, how would you react to a food truck selling a similar product if it parked say 15 feet from your establishment? 0 Supports Heln de Hogs about 1 month ago Jordan, I will answer your question. However, I see you work for the city. I don't think its the cities responsrbUy to limit entrepreneurs or to offer protectionism for particular business'. Many restaurants take their food concepts on the road and that is certainly something any Brick and Mortar restaurants may want to consider. Remember food trucks are portable and they can travel to wherever they get the most bang for their buck on any given day. My suspicion is that a food truck would not park 15 feet away from any restaurant for any length of tine. I don't know how other cities have handled that but either way, lots ofother cities have food trucks. Furthermore, depending on the food truck and the restaurant, there may not be any competition. Pittsburgh Blue sn't going to compete with Sloppy Gipetobs (spelling?) even if they are parked outside then door. So to answer your question directly, my reaction would hkely be one of displeasure, but the city shouldn't regulate my pleasure, or any other business'. Have a great dayl 1 Support comment... Reply to Jordan Gilgenbach comment... Reply to Hein de Hoog Joel Stegner about I month age Food trucks should be zoned out of certain areas. For example, they would only increase the level of congestion at 50th and France, 44th and France and the area around Southdale. They should be encouraged to compete with the catering businesses - or in fact, catering businesses should be allowed to have food trucks. 0 Supports comment:.. i tichael Swanson about 1 month ago Reply to Joel Stegner No. It's a nonsensical question. They should 'protect" themselves by offering the best value for the consumer considering all the things that go into the dining situation If a food truck parked in a parking lot takes 'their" business it is because they offered the consumer something they wanted at a better value. As to zoning issues, it's too often a subjective issue that business use to bully other businesses. If 50th and France has a traffic congestion issues, it has more to do with poor decisions by Edina with regards to traffic signals and turn lanes. Elinvnate all turns at 50th and France is a more logical response than allowing restaurants to use the issue to eliminate competition. 0 Supports comment... i DaddBurlev about 1 month ago Reply to Michael Swanson Yes, there should be protections. Most municipalities offer geographic boundaries, or specific areas were trucks can and can't operate. 50th & France is already congested. Has atryone considered the noise and odor issues surrounding these trucks and their generators for the many residents of the neigliborhood? 0 Supports comment... i Reply to DaNd Burley Jim Stromberg 30 days ago If we're going to offer unbridled competition without regulation, wiry stop at food? Let's put every enterprise there is in a truck, and send them out into the neighborhoods. While I value competition, putting a truck outside any'Lke' product - food or otherwise - is not'equar competition. It automatically favors the truck. With our crowded streets the way they are, putting more vehicles out there seems counterproductive on many levels. I'd also add that simply doing away with turn lanes at 50th and France isn't likely to ease congestion much. There already is a restriction on left hums on northbound France, and look at how many people ignore THAT signage. David also brings up another valid point in the discussion: odor and noise. Do we really want to add to that? 0 Supports comment... i Mick Stenson at January 24, 2014 at 4:01pm CST Reply to Jim Stromberg As a longtime resident of Edina and a restauranteur for almost 20 years, I have firth that the city will give great thought before allowing food tricks. As they do they should consider that most restaurants pay between $25 and $80 per square foot of rent for their 'brick and mortar ". This includes real estate taxes that help pay for road repairs and plowing. Let's make sure they pay their fair share. Other cities have required the food trucks to love a commissary in the city they service, to help 'level the playing field'. In addition to this, I would suggest that there be a separation from restaurants and food trucks of 100 -200 feet. Restrictions from busy conmxrcial areas is something all of us would want. If this were to go ahead, I certainly would suggest a small number to start out with so the real need and problems can be studied. 0 Supports comment... i Aprf ut7l at January 26,2014 at8:32pmCST Reply to Mick Stenson No, I go to a restaurant to sit down. I go to a food truck because I have 15 minutes before I have to be somewhere else. There isn't really competition 1 Support comment... i i i Will Ca%e Will Carr at January 27, 2014 at 12:50am CST Reply to April Lutz Does this mean that if the existing businesses began to fail (with or without the presence of food trucks) they would get a bail out? That is more of a rhetorical question but food for thought none the less. 0 Supports F '3 Jordan GYlunbach adniln at January 27, 2014 at 8:52am CST Thanks for your comment! It is food for thought for sure. But, the idea behind protections, are things, like how close to an existing business a food truck could set up shop. Other cities have similar rules for their food trucks. It wouldn't mean a bailout for fining businesses. 0 Supports Will Cast Will Caw at January 27, 2014 at 10:11 am CST Sony that should be set up shop not sent 0 Supports Will Cave Will Cage at Japuary27, 2014 at 10:13am CST Thanks Jordan, I would think 100 feet or so would be sufficient & perhaps on the opposite side of the street. To sent up shop directly in the entrance of another - restaurant is not only tacky, itis not right. How does Edina currently handle on street parking for regular vehicles? Ifthat is where food trucks would be parking, that's something to consider. Perhaps a permit to park in designated areas... 0 Supports comment— Reply to Jordan Gllgenbach comment ... Reply to Will Cage Will Caps u Mark Johnson at January 27, 2014 at 9:38pm CST No protection per say, but food trucks should have to pay taxes and fees Ike any other business. If you look at what happened in downtown nmmneapolis, the creation offood trucks led to an unprovernent in quality in the skyway dining options 0 Supports comment:.. Reply to Mark Johnson Jerry Holguin i0anuary2g, 2014 at 7:27pm CST Competition is, always good for the customer. I agree that they should pay taxes and fees Ike any otber business. 6 Supports comment... Reply to Jerry Holguin Speak Up. Edina! Q HQM • Discussions Sign" • Ideas • SuryeyE Email email address... Password password... Sign In Like �__ Tweet Share H \ \i Speak Up, Edina! O We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an y even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak -up, Edinal ► SHRRIF your feedbackl ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Food Trucks The City is interested to find out how the corimmity feels about food trucks. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to the City Council as i 6miational only. 5 Topics - 99 Answers Gosed 2014-02 -02 View Discussion 0 Attachments Topic: Locations of food trucks If food trucks were allowed, should they be restricted to certain areas of the City? Where would you like to see them? 13 Responses 13 Responses Hein de How about 1 month ago I dolt think they should be in residential areas either late or on a regular basis, but clearly they wouldn't make any money there so naturally that wouldn't happen Commercial and industrial areas, chnnrcbes or schools may wish to collaborate with food trucks for fiord raising events, they should be allowed in park areas and at special events such as 4th of July parade or fireworks etc. I don't see a need for many restrictions. 2 Supports Will Care Will Cage at January 27, 2014 at 12:46am CST Tbat's a great idea! Food bucks should be where the customers who want to eat there are! 1 Support comment... Reply to Will Care WIII Cake comment... Reply to Hein de Hoog D Joel Stegner about 1 mouth ago I agree with the comment above. 0 Supports comment... Repty to Joel Stegner Rachel Thelemann about ] month ago I agree with above comment but in addition, I would add trucks should not be allowed in congested areas that would increase traffic even more. I would be open to hosting them at the Edina Art Fair (special events). But not on a regular basis as it would take away from the restaurant businesses. 50th & France is becoming a restaurant destination- Allowing food trucks would change that perception and the direction of our business rode. 1 Support comment... Reply to Rachel Thelemann Sarah Wuest about 1 month ago It would be wonderful to see them around Centennial Park on days of the Fanners Market. Or along France dining the art fair. Saturdays and Sundays by the Lb,ary. Let's be creative and help make. it happen. 0 Supports comment... i Sarah Wuest about 1 month ago Reply to Sarah Wuest By Braemer park would be great too - golf and hockey is a great combo and there are very few eating establishments around there. 2 Supports comment... Reply to Sarah Wuest JefBro\m about l month ago A point of clarification; food trucks have been allowed to operate in the City in the past, but only in association with a Special Event (Art Fair, Fall into the Arts Festival, etc.). This is an important distinction; a food truck associated with an event vs. a food truck setting up somewhere 5 days a week for 6 months out of the year. Marry of the factors raised on this forum (business competition, parking, food safety, licensing, regulation, food accessibility, etc.) combine to make this a very interesting topic. JeffBrown, City of Edina, Comnumity Health Administrator 0 Supports comment ... i Michael Swanson about 1 month ago Reply to Jeff Brown Portland Oregon has a great model for food trucks. They combine two things for an excellent experience. They group the food trucks into a small space either in line or square. This limits the space used and puts a lot of options side by side. It's nice to be able to hand a teenager $10 and tell to find what they want in a small area. Then, they typically have a sitting area with benches, trash buns and restroorrs next to the food trucks. They don't always have the space but they make the effort People walk, bike or drive to the food truck location choose whatever strikes their fancy at the moment, and then they sit together to enjoy the food. Edina should study Portland OR and Madison WI for examples of managing the experience. 0 Supports comment ... Reply to Michael Swanson Amid Rude v about 1 month ago Yes they should be restricted, they should be allowed only where they don't compete with existing businesses or strait existing infrastructure. 1 Support comment... i ❑1 .lim Schedin at January 24, 2014 at 12:22pm CST Reply to Dmdd Burley My suspicion is that there are more food trucks out and about in Edina titan anyone cares to disclose. In the 1980's I worked in the Parklawn Office District and enjoyed purchasing meals once or twice a week from a food truck that drove right up to our door! 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jim Schedin ,terry Hal -uln at January 28, 2014 at 7:32pm CST I would Ike them on a regular basis in an area that does not restrict pedestrians from visiting other commercial areas of Edina and in an area that does not lead to increased auto tra&c. 0 Supports comment... Reply to Jerry Holguin It Jlm Schedin at January 29, 2014 at 4:51 pm CST Thinking of those faD evenings watching the Homet games at Kuhlman field, what would it be like to have half a dozen food trucks listed up in the parking lot? Pm sure it would be a boon to the kids and then parents who are racing around before the game, trying to figure out their dinner solutions. Is offering more than what is available at the concession stand good or bad? Who or what organizations rely on the sales from the concession stand? Would they be hurt? Could a permit fee to park a food truck in the parking lot on game night be paid to the schools as a method to generate income and offset any losses in concession sales? AD questions to ponder.... 0 Supports :omment... Reply to Jim Schedin L� Lee Onus at January 30, 2014 at 7:07pm CST Location is everything A few food trucks would be a good fit at the Centennial Lakes Fanners where all vendors are already setting up a temporary shop. The market would benefit from ttmre ready - made food selections, especially with the loss of Big River Piag after 2012. Last year, the choices were either grilled lotdogs or bratwurst The market gets a good crowd from 3 p.m. to 7 p.m on Ttnnsdays: while the market is running from lime to September. Please leave food trucks out of the rest of die city:'lheir operating expenses are so much less than other established food venues, it just would not be fair. 1 Support :omment... Reply to Lee Owens- Sign up connect mail address... Fsignupl ea aU Edina! Horne • Discussio Sign UOM Ideas • Sutvey� Email all address... Password password... Sign in kr�i Like Tweet i._ . Share �e � � y ,��1tiKiRA�� � • tea» Edina! Speak We're always looking for feedback and ideas for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business: Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is cwrently closed. Discussion: Food Trucks The City is interested to find out how the community feels about food bucks. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback on topics will be compiled and given to the City Council as informational only. 5 Topics 99 Answers Closed2ot4 -02 -02 View Discussion 0 Attachments Topic: Licchsin Should the City limit the number of licenses available every year? Why or why not? 7 Responses 7 Responses Hein de Hooe about 1 month ago No need to limit the licenses. City can earn a little on the sale of the license (understanding that our geographic area of sales will be much steer :bon say Minneapolis so don't get aggressive on the licensing fee) and the trucks themselves and the residents that use the trucks will natural1y figure out how many trucks can operate profitably within the city. 1 Support comment... i Joel Stegner about 1 mouth ago Reply to Hein rte Hoog I think that you have licenses that vary in length with shorter term ones being less expensive. I'd see 1 -2 licenses for food trucks that want to cover a special event, but not commit to an continuous presence. Likewise, a food truck might want to get a three month license - to cover something like the Edina pool or Braenr. I would wonder where the fine would be draw. Do we current allow ice cream trucks, which essentially are a food truck? How about flood delivery services or pica delivery services - some I've seen in other places actually have an owen in the vehicle. What is in and what is out needs to be carefully considered. 0 Supports comment... i Michael S«anson about 1 mouth ago Reply to Joel Stegner What's the purpose of the license? Hopefirlly, it's to make this revenue neutral to Edina. Edina is about good governance and safety. To the degree they incur expenses directly causes by the food trucks, they should be compensated to keep the taxpayers from picking up the cost If Edina provides space, benches and trash pick up for the food trucks there should be some tax as a percentage of sales. Instead of large fixed cost up front, this allows the food trucks to contribute the tax as their sales rise or fall 0 Supports comment... i 4� l Moss Bintncr 25 days ago Reply to Michael Swanson I serve as the staff liaison to the Energy and Environment Cornn fission (EEC). The EEC has expressed concern for local air quality issues in the past and has worked in the comnumity to reduce vehicle idling. Perhaps there could be some sort of idling limitations, and nrinirnum maintenance requirement in the licensing? 0 Supports comment... i Reply to Ross Blntner Aprll t.utz at January 26, 2014 at 8:39pm CST No. I agree the food truck owners wid 5gure that out amongst themselves. 0 Supports omment... Reply to April Lutz Will Ca%e Will Caie at January 27, 2014 at 12 :53arn CST The state already has strict licensing requirements that are the same ones brick & mortar restaurants are required to follow. That should be sufficient for everyone. 0 Supports omment... Reply to will Cave will cake Jerry Holguin at January 28, 2014 at 7:33pm CST I wouldn't necesarily limit the number of licenses. But, I would probably be thoughtful about the number of food trucks that can park in any given area of the city. Less trucks in highly congested areas and more in open areas near parks, for example. 0 Supports omment... Reply to Jerry Holguin Sign Up Connec t email address... Sign up Participants 1� • Discussions Sign -1 &mail email address... Password password:.. Sign In Llk© U Tweet Share ETA Speak Up,. Edina! We're always looking for feedback and ideas'for how we can make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. Take a moment to provide your feedback and ideas on any of the forums you see here or start your own discussion. It's your chance to speak up, Edinal ► SHARE your feedback! ► POST your ideas! ► JOIN the discussion! This Discussion channel is currently closed. Discussion: Food Trucks The City is interested to find out how the community feels about food trucks. Note: The City is not proposing a change at this time. By using this online discussion, feedback.on topics will be compiled and given to the City Countil as informational only. 5 Topics 99 Answers Closed 2014.02 -02 View Discussion 0 Attachments Topic: Hours of0 erJl ition When should food trucks be allowed? Only during summer, events, all year, or something else? What about time of day? 9 Responses. 9.Responses Hein de Moog about I month ago Let the market forces figure that out, so long as they aredt disturbing residents in residential areas late into the night. 0 Supports .terry Holguin at January 28, 2014 at 734pm CST Completely agree with Hem de Hoog. 0 Supports comment... L comment ... FAI]k Joel Stegner about 1 mouth ago Reply to Jerry Holguin Reply to Heln de Hoog This gets into regulation of their operation. For example, ice cream trucks traditional play music to announce their presence. Will this be awed? To what degree will food trucks be held responsible for the trash and discarded food they produce? Where are they allowed to park, and will they have access to commercial parking lots - or just streets potentially increasing accidents. As long as the city comes up with an intelligent plan that anticipates problems and questions, Pll personally support it. 1 Support %Pill Caw Will Ca%e at January 27, 2014 at 12:44am CST You Make an interesting point Ice cream Trucks do have a limitation on the volume they can play their music at Most trucks don't have awns or if they do, it is not overly loud and played only during service. Truck should operate when customers want them And on a side note, ice cream tricks are technically food trucks everyone. 0 Supports comment.. . L comment... L Reply to Will Cave Will C;m Reply to Joel Stegner Sn nr Nnea about t month ago Lunch, dinner and during events 0 Supports :omment... Reply to Sarah Wuest Michael Swanson about t month ago Food trucks are about the outdoor experience, Minnesota is a great place to live, but no one wants to eat outdoors when it's miserable. You can grt some great days in the winter, but it's unlikely that it would support a food truck in the winter months. Make this a "seasonal' business . Lake the swallows returning to Capistrano, let Edina residents the anticipate the late April return of the food trucks, and their sweet sorrow of their departure at the end of October. 0 Supports :omment... Repy to Michael Swanson } Jim Strombere 30 days ago Pm not so sure we can be restrictive and be consistent in our positions. For instance, if we favor food trucks and say'loo bad, brick & mortar business - try and compete ", but only allow the food buck industry to operate in the summer, we give the advantage to the food track. Ifwe're going to allow them to operate in Edina, let's tell them they also have to provide their service in the winter. The guy working in an office that wants a firsh hmch in the summer also wants it in the winter, All I'm saying is that if we speak "kee enterprise ", we can't limit their availability to only operate in the summer. 0 Supports ;omment... Reply to Jim Slromberg choel 17 days ago Food Trucks should only be allowed in Edina dining special events when our local brick & Mortar business's can't keep up with the demand of the large crouds. I Support :omment... Reply to Michael G AIKII Lug at January 26, 2014 at 8:41pmi CST rd propose to start with no tine ofyear or time of day restrictions and only iimplementifproves to be needed down'the road. 0 Supports comment.. Reply to April Lutz r Everything Pcoliie photos videos Not Advanced Sr~mO All people Ni,al,le yui "r follow Everywhere ytm W110 10 1011 OW • Refresh • View all Kaylln Martin nM X rr... Followed by Edina Sun Curr... Follow Edina Su •• Follow AA+ X wn a oll@orndotnews �j The Wow Bar @thewowbar X %1 Follow Popular accounts •Find fiends Minneapolis - ii'elKIS -Change #CelebrateWithABite Q Promoted #BadAfterShows JayLeno #Sochl2014 #SHELOOKSSOPERFECT Bob Cos tas Tonight Show [Mnter Olympies #mnwild #SadToys @2014Twitter About Help Terms Privacy Cookies Ads info Brand Blog Status Apps Jobs Advertise Medla Developers ... Fie "UltS f0i q'(141:4 Iif'od b f tit l'!I Save Top / All Jordan Gilgenbach @jgilgenbach • Feb 4 @hotdishblog Edina seeks feedback on food- to-Iiquor ratio for restaurants. Will be interesting like food trucks was. bit.ly /1 bmYv2e Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre -ws SO MaterlalHandling @SJF corn - Feb 2 "SSW Should the City of #Edina allow food trucks? It's a mixed bag of answers bit.ly /1freb9j Expand 4% Reply ti Retweet *Favorite ••• Nbre 1 A Cupcake Social @,ACupeakeSocial • Jan 31 q Today Is the last day for Edina residents to speak up on behalf of @FoodTrucksMN Please go to speakupedino.org /discussions /fo... and voice your opinion Expand 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre M N Food Truck Assoc @FoodTrucksMN • Jan 31 Last day to speak your mind. Lets snake food trucks in Edina a reality this surnmerl speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... Expand I 4% Reply t7 Retweet *Favorite ••• More City of Edina, MN @EdlnaMN • Jan 31 Today Is the last day to submit your opinions on food trucks) Go to Speak Up, Edinal and let us know Mat you thinkl bit.ty/1 bdB1 jc EVand I F Reply S Delete *Favorite ••• More Minnesota Business @MnBlzMag • Jan 29 Should the City of #Edina allowfood trucks? It's a mixed bag of answers: ow.ly /t5Kc0 @FoodTrucksMN Expand h Reply O Retweet *Favorite ••• More drewbkerr @drewbkerr - Jan 29 Not to snark, but why Is @MnBizMag content w/ a story built around quotes from 1W message boards? ow.ly /t5Kc0 * Hide conversation ti Reply t4 Retweet *Favorite ••• Nbre 7:02 PM - 29 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @drewbkerr @MnBizMag IPMinnesota Business @MnBizMag • Jan 30 @drewbkerr Wanted to get the Info. out to readers since we've covered food truck Issues In the past +Speak Up Edina convo. Is pretty engaging band 4s Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More Minnesota Business @MnBlzMag • Jan 29 Ok Should the City of #Edina allow food trucks? ft's a mixed bag of answers: ow.ly1t5Kc0 @FoodTrucksMN Collapse 4„ Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More RETWEETS FAVORITE 3 1 6:50 PM - 29 Jan 2014 • Details J, Reply to @MnBizMag @FoodTrucksMN dwdrewbkerr @drewbken • Jan 29 Not to snark, but why Is @MnBlzMag content w/ a story built around quotes from message boards? ow.ly 1t5Kc0 Expand 1 4% Reply 0 Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre Street Grindz @streetgdndz • Jan 29 @MnBizMag I have yet to hear any good argument against food truck operation In any city. Expand 4%Reply t4Retweet *Favorite ... Nbre Minnesota Business @MnBlzMag • Jan 30 @drewbkerr Wanted to get the info. out to readers since vie've covered food truck issues in the past +Speak Up Edina convo. is pretty engaging Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre Stephanie Mansfield @MNSmallBiz • Jan 29 [MN Business] Should the City of Edina allowWoodtrucks? dlvr.it/4pg7FIp Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre .4 Grill Work Truck @grill works • Jan 29 @EatStTweet Could we get a RT please? Edina, MN is considering allow food �.. , trucks. Fans please share your support) speakupedina .org /discussions/fo... Collapse 4, Reply 0 Retweet * Favorite ••• More AETWEETS FAVORITE A a 3:43 PM - 29 Jan 2014 - Details Reply to @grill works @EatStTweet Cheese E Wagon @chesseewagon • Jan 30 @grill_works @EatStTweet Interesting reading...can i get a spot loi from Philadelphia, PA 4% Reply V4 Retweet * Favorite ••• More Grill Work Truck @grill works • Jan 30 @cheeseewagon @EatStTweet Why not? The more the married Expand 4% Reply 0 Retweet * Favorite ••• More Cheese E. Wagon @cheeseewagon • Jan 30 @grill works @EatStTweet Sounds Good lol from Philadelphia, PA 4%Reply ti Retweet * Fawrite ... Nbre SpOt Gourmet Burgers @Spotburgers Jan 30 j @grill_works @EatStTweet welcOme to the NOW MN. Expand 1 4%Reply 0Retweet *Favorite •••More M N Food Truck Assoc @FoodTrucksMN • Jan 29 Food truck season is closer than you think) Edina want to eat from food trucks this summer? Voice your opinion NOW mnfoodtruckessociation .org /call= to- action... Expand 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre Natedogs@ @Nate_Dogs • Jan 28 All cities In MN should allow food trucks. Edina Is considering just that. Fans please share your supportl speakupedina .org /discussions /fo...° Collapse 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More Z 6 3 wEET3 FAVORITES ® ®19 & v 8:53 AM - 28 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @Nate_Dogs JJLJJI MldNordEmpanadaTruck @MldNordTrucks • Jan 27 We believe all cities In MN should allow food trucks. Edina is considering Just that. Fans please share your support) speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... Expand 1 4% Reply 0 Retweet * Favorite ••• Nbre Stevl @Ste%4TdpleM • Jan 27 @rustytacomn " @andrewammern: Piz let Edina city council no you love food trucks. Deadline Is 1/31/14 Click for Info mnfoodtruckassociation.org /call -to- action..." Expand 1 4% Reply t4 Retweet * Favorite ••• More t Amy Pampusch Olson @AmyPampusch • Jan 27 @FritzArnason This Is for you from @andrewzimmern. Let Edina city council know you love food trucks and real food. mnfoodtruckassociation.org /call -to- action...... Expand it a Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More Andrew Zimmern @andrewzimmem • Jan 27 e Please let Mina city council know you love food trucks and real food, fast. Deadline Is 1/31/14 Click for info mnfoodtruckassociation.org /call -to- action... Collapse I 4%Reply t4Relweet *Favorite ... More WEETS 3 FAV ORITES ® � 30 21 9:19 PM - 27 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @andrewzimmem Dan Brookens @DanBrookens • Jan 27 @andrewdmmern #CakeEaters Expand 4% Reply C4 Retweet *Favorite ... More M N Cheese Festival @MNCheeseFest • Jan 27 @andrewzimmern we love food trucks) almost as much as we love cheese. Expand 1 4% Reply C4Retweel *Favorite —More FUl Alex B. @Alex Barringer . Jan 27 @andrewzimmern Some of the most Interesting food comes from the food trucks In the #TwinCities, #EdinaCityCouncil, vote to allow them Expand 4% Reply t"4 Retweet *Favorite ... More AM @nininl1999 @ninini1999 • Jan 27 @andrewzimmern Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More Kharmyn Cousins @KhannynBaby • Jan 28 @andrewdmmern My in -laws live In Edina...doubt they would eat out of a food truck or support thisl Although, they have surprised mel LOLL Expand 4% Reply V4 Retweet *Favorite ... More MN Food Truck Assoc @FoodTrucksMN • Jan 27 We have till Jan 31 to let Edina council members knowhowwe feel about food trucksl Please speak upl mnfoodtruckassociation.org /call -to- action... Collapse I 4%Reply t3 Retweet * Fawrite ---More RGfiTWEETS FAVORITES ( _ , ® 0 A AJ 8:04 PM - 27 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @FoodTrucksMN LuLu's Street Food @LulusStreetFood - Jan 27 Come and support local economy three cheers for edina speakupedina.org/discussions/fo... Expand I 4%Reply ti Retweet *Favorite ••• Mare Kona Ice of S Mpls @KonaMpls • Jan 27 @FoodTrucksMN hey foodies..help make MN food truck friendly. Edina is reviewing now ...join the conversation speakupedina .org /discussions/fo... Expand - 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ... More MN Food Truck Assoc @FoodTrucksMN • Jan 27 We believe all cities In MN should allow food trucks. Edina Is considering Just that. Fans please share your supportl speakupedina .org /discussions /fo... Collapse 4+ Reply C4 Retweet * Fawrite ••• More RE TWEETS F`FAVORITES •111:48 AM - 27 Jan 2014 . Details Reply to @FoodTrucksMN u:r,... m n—....4 r,u;tiachiDaruma • Jan 27 :hi Food lovers please share and support) l l 'h Reply ORetweet *Favorite ••• More KonaMpls • Jan 27 @FoodTrucksMN Food Trucks in Edinal Foodies join the conversation & show ur support to get FT's in Edina : tinyurl.wm/md7eber Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More Wines And Gardens @WlneAndGarden • Jan 27 RT,I@gastrotruck Hey Edina Friendsl clout this call for action from Edina's City Govt about letting trucks Into Edinal... fb.mel6GgOLG6uy Expand I 4%Reply ORetweet *Favorite ... More Gastrotruck @gastrotruck • Jan 26 Hey Edina Friendsl Check out this call for action from Edina's City Government about letting trucks Into Edinal... fb.me /6GgOLG6Uy Collapse I 4%Reply ORetweet *Fawrite •••More RETWEETS FAVORITE 4 1 11:44 PM - 26 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @gastrotruck i ButcherSalt @ButcherSalt • Jan 26 want to see food trucks In Edina? We could use your support. mnfoodtruckassociation.org/call-to-action... speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... Expand 1 4% Reply 0 Retweet * Favorite ••• More 0 Edina Eater @EdinaEater • Jan 23 Would food trucks roll Into #Edina? edinaeater.com/food- trucks -de... Expand I 4% Reply O Retweet *Favorite ••• CVbre Wines And Gardens @WineAndGarden • Jan 21 RTVEdinaMN: Food trucks In Edina? Join our active online discussion and let us knowwhat you thinkl speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... A #foodtrucksl Expand 4% Reply ti Retweet *Favorite ••• Nbre ��r/w��� Edina Sun Current @EdinaSunCurrent • Jan 21 SUN. RT @EdinaMN: Food trucks In Edina? Join our active online discussion and let us knowwhat you thinkl speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... Expand 1 4% Reply ti Retweet * Favorite ••• More City of Edina, M N @EdinaMN • Jan 21 Food trucks In Edina? Join our active online discussion and let us knowwhat you thinkl speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... Collapse 1 4% Reply 11 Delete *Favorite ... More RETWEET 1 1:52 PM -21 Jan 2014 • Details Reply to @EdinaMN / 01 Wally Norlander @WallyNoriander • Jan 21 @EdinaMN Fun for a few of us who frequent 50th and France, Centennial Lakes, Southdale/Galleria, but It would be bad for local restaurants. Expand I 4. Reply C4 Retweet *Favorite ... !Vlore Laura Michaels @FSNLauraM • Jan 20 Food trucks In Edina? The city Is asking for input from residents and business i J owners bit.lyll dJvNhy Expand 4% Reply O Retweel *Favorite ••• More Keane @FoodStoned • Jan 17 �l Edina opens online forum to discuss clty's ban on food trucks P v-- blogs.citypages.com/food /2014 /01 /c... via @FlotDlshBlog ❑View summary - I 4%Reply t311etweet *Favorite ... More (ioEIN Truck News @EINTruckNews • Jan 17 Edina opens online forum to discuss city's ban on food trucks s.einnews.com1dz2wj -xDjG Expand 4% Reply ti Retweet *Favorite ••• More Grill Work Truck @grill works • Jan 17 Should Edina remove their ban on food trucks? fb.me /37onMggi D flew summary 1 4% Reply tZ Retweet * Favorite ••• More S OW City Pages @chin for • Jan 17 Edina opens online forum to discuss city's ban on food trucks blogs.citypages.com/food /2014 /01 /c... D Mew summary I 4%Reply t3Relweel * Favorite - - -More �q� Edina Sun Current @EdinaSunCurrent • Jan 6 W Edina's question of the month: To allow or not allow food trucks In Edina... ow.ly /sf2hr Expand 4%Reply tiRetweet *Favorite -- -More Tom Downing @Realty Tom • Jan 1 Should Edina Allow Food Trucks? - Today In Edina - Edina, MN Patch edina.patch.com/groups/54hing... EVand h Reply ti Retweet * Favorite -- -More Edina Eater @EdinaEater • Dec 31 #FoodTrucks in #Edina? State your views at speakupedina.org /discussions /fo... via @EdinaChamber Expand 4%Reply tm4Retweet *Favorite - - -Nbre PEdina Patch @EdinaPatch • Dec 31 Should Edina Allow Food Trucks? edina.patch.com/grou ps /5- thing... Expand I 4%Reply tiRetweet *Favorite - --More Edina Chamber of Corn @EdinaChamber • Dec 31 Will Edina have food trucks? To join the online discussion go to: speakupedina .org /discussions/fo... #VoiceYourOpinion Expand I 4%Reply V&Retweel *Fau)6nM - - -Nbre City of Edina, MN @EdinaMN • Dec 30 What do you think about allowing food trucks in Edina? Share your feelings on Speak Up, Edinal ne)d month: bit.ly /1elFdN5 Expand I 4%Reply #Delete *Favorite - - -More Edina Sun Current @EdinaSunCurrent - Aug 21 SUNEdina hasn't taken any action RT @rnspbjnews: Food trucks fleeing downtown "Hunger Games" hit roadblocks In suburbs: bi7j.us /t1 n9t Expand I 4%Reply tiRetweet *Favorite -- -More Edina Sun Current @EdinaSunCurrent • Mar 13 SUN City council round up: Wooddale Avenue center line, SWLRT, possible street Improvement districts, food trucks: ow.lyliPYCU Expand I 4%Reply t3Retweet *Fawrite -- -More 6- call to action & news ATTENTION ALL FOOD TRUCKS: FIRST MFTA GRASS ROOTS CAMPAIGN TO EFFECT http: / /speakupedina.org/discussions /food - trucks Topic: Should food trucks be allowed? Currently, City Code does not allow food trucks In Edina Would you support food trucks? j Why or why not? All Categories American Yes, food trucks should be allowed to operate in Edina. Food trucks are great examples of job Asian creating entrepreneurial enterprises, which provide many benefits to the communities they serve. These small businesses offer fun and very diverse experiences to their customers. CHANGE IN OUR COMMUNITY- PLEASE READ AND ACT. MUST RESPOND BY NEXT FRIDAY, JANUARY 31ST: ABOUT EVENTS The City of Edina, MN has created a new initiative called "Speak Up Edina" It is intended to CALL TO give a forum for residents and businesses to express their opinions on a variety of topics. ACTION & The current topic is food trucks and whether or not they should be allowed in Edina. Currently, they are not, except in very limited circumstances such as during special events. NEWS CALENDAR All of the Food Trucks need to urge their social media followers in Edina to chime in on the PRESS Food Trucks' behalf. This is the MFTA's first formal grass roots campaign. We need to FIND THE galvanize our City of Edina followers on all of our social media outlets to take action. TRUCKS Remember, the feedback that's given to Speak Up Edina goes to the City Council. So we want SPONSORS them to hear positive and constructive feedback. The following questions are posted by the CONTACT city on their website. These questions are listed below, along Ideas on what messages we want to convey to our supporters. The suggested answers below are merely suggestions; please encourage followers to ,put these in their own words . 1 Here is the link to the Speak Up Edina website. We only have until January 31St to make comments. http: / /speakupedina.org/discussions /food - trucks Topic: Should food trucks be allowed? Currently, City Code does not allow food trucks In Edina Would you support food trucks? j Why or why not? All Categories American Yes, food trucks should be allowed to operate in Edina. Food trucks are great examples of job Asian creating entrepreneurial enterprises, which provide many benefits to the communities they serve. These small businesses offer fun and very diverse experiences to their customers. Charbroiled Topic: Protection for existing businesses. Coffee Comfort Should there be protection in place for brick - and - mortar businesses against mobile food Cupcake trucks? If so, what? . Dessert Empanadas Food truck operators and food truck fans believe that brick - and - mortar business and food French trucks can co- exist: Food trucks should not be restricted in order to protect restaurants from Fusion competition. In fact, food trucks benefit the local restaurant industry by increasing foot traffic. Customers look to food trucks for a very different experience than what they get at Gluten -Free Hawaiian brick-and-mortar restaurants. Food trucks and restaurants are not competing for the same, Healthy dollar. "Food trucks can only offer food to go. Hibachi Topic: Locations of food trucks. Homestyle Indian If food trucks were allowed, should they be restricted to certain areas of the city? Where Island would you like to see them? Italian Italian Water Ice In the entrepreneurial spirit of small business, food trucks favor fewer restrictions. However, Japanese operators are considerate of other businesses and local residents when they are operating. A Latin food truck would not want to park and sell its food in, a heavily trafficked area where its truck Local made it difficult for other vehicles to pass. A food truck would not want to park on a Meat residential street with no other businesses close by. Food trucks need to be around people. Mexican Ideal places for a food truck could be at a local business, a popular hangout area, park or Middle Eastern festival. Food trucks believe in and are happy to comply with public health and safety. Midwestern regulations. Minnesotan Organic Topic: Licensing. Paleo Portfolio Should the city limit the number of licenses available every year? Why or why not? Sandwiches Seasonal Food truck operators don't favor limiting the number of food trucks. Competition within the Sorbets food truck industry and market saturation dictates the appropriate number of food truck Spanish operators. Vegetarian Topic: Hours of Operation. Wieners World When should food trucks be allowed? Only during summer, events, all year, or something . _ .. else? What time of day? Food trucks need people around to be successful, and they should be able to operate year round. It should be up the food truck operator when to venture out and fire up the truck. The Chef Shack was a food truck vendor at the Southwest Minneapolis, Fulton Farmers Market during 2013. Food trucks may be coming to a crossroads in Edina. Food trucks are prohibited but discussions are going at full speed. Take a glance at Speak Up Edina. Food trucks are sparking lively debate. Public Comments The City of Edina is asking for public comment throughout January and not just from Edina residents. While no change is proposed at this time, a debate is going full gear. Speak Up Edina poses questions about food trucks in Edina, including: • Should food trucks be allowed? City code does not allow food trucks in Edina. Would you support food trucks coming to Edina? • Should protection in place for brick - and - mortar businesses against mobile food trucks? • If food trucks were allowed, should they be restricted to certain areas? Where would you like to see them? • Should the city limit the number of licenses available annually? • When should food trucks be allowed? What about time of day? Opinions About Food Trucks The census seems to be that brick and mortar restaurant owners are opposed. On the other hand, foodies love the idea of new food options on wheels. Somewhere in the middle, the rest of the general public varies in opinion from "yea" to "nay." "Yes" to Food Trucks at the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market The Edina's famers market could use more ready -made food selections. During my visits last year, the choices were limited to grilled hotdogs or bratwurst. Sadly, Big River Pizza was not a vendor during the 2013 season and their slot remained empty. A food truck would be a perfect fit in that spot. A few more trucks could go in front of Hughes Pavilion and at the tail ends of the market beside the last vendors. The market generates substantial foot traffic from 3 p.m. to y p.m. on Thursdays in Centennial Lakes Park. Minnesota's fickle weather is at its best during this period while the market is running from mid -June until the end of September. Food trucks would make a good fit at the market where all vendors are setting up a temporary shop. "No" to Food Trucks in the Rest of Edina Location is everything. Consider Edina's unique business climate and city dynamic. • Competition: Brick and mortar restaurants have huge year - round, fixed expenses operating in Edina where rent and land values are some of the highest in the metro. Some casualties of the high cost of doing business in Edina include: 1. Tejas •/ 2. Pandolfi Candy Gelato & Gifts 3. Alix In Candyland 4. Franklin Baker. 5. Premiere Cheese Market 6. Bissinger French Confections 7. In Season (in nearby Southwest Minneapolis) Congestion: Edina has high traffic levels. The adjoining streets of the Crosstown and Highway 494 are not without bumper to bumper backups. 5oth & France and 44th and France have ongoing parking issues, especially during peak business times. Food trucks would add to the traffic challenge. • Noise: Edina business areas already have noise from traffic, airplanes, construction sites and general city clatter. Truck engines and generators would add to the clamor. • Image: An upscale retail and restaurant mix is a draw for Edina Business. Would food trucks be upmarket additions? Just About Edina Remember food trucks in Edina are the focus, not the validity of food trucks as a whole in general terms. The debate is whether food trucks would make Edina an even better place for living, learning, raising families and doing business. At the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market, they would do just that. Tags: 44th & France 5oth & France restaurant Centennial Lakes Farmers Market Edina dining Edina Eater Edina Eating Edina Market Edina restaurant Seasonal foods 0 I2PlatPC1 Pnct� rzo eta S ininnesota BUSINESS magazine Should the City of Edina allow food trucks? The Minnesota Food Truck Association has formalized Its first grassroots campaign around the Issue POSTED ON 01129/2014 - 4:41 PM I FROM THE SLOG It's a simple question that's garnered almost 100 answers: Should food trucks be allowed to operate in Edina, Minn.? Through a new initiative called "Speak up, Edina," Edina city officials are collecting responses from community business owners and residents on the topic. And the Minnesota Food Truck Association has been quick to provide input. In their first grassroots campaign (hug: /trmfoodlruckassociakon.oro!ca l- to- aclbnnewst , the state's food truck association is encouraging all food truck owners and operators to chime in on the Speak up. Edina discussion board (ht1p./Ispeakuf)p.d,na.org/discilssions/food-trucks). Discussion topics include protection for existing businesses ( http : / /speakuoedina.orgldiscussions /food - trucks /topics /protection- for - existing - businesses) , locations of food trucks htio:lisneakupedi.9a.org /discussions/ food - Irucks /topicsAocations -of- food - trucks), h4 rr-s of operation hll 7llspeakuoedina.org /discussions/ food - trucks /loplcs/houm- ol- operationl , and licensing (hilp:/ Isp eakuoedina.org /discussions/food- trucks /lopics/kcensing) . "Yes, food trucks should be allowed to operate in Edina," the Minnesota Food Truck Association says on their website. "Food trucks are great examples of job creating entrepreneurial enterprises, which provide many benefits to the communities they serve. These small businesses offer fun and very diverse experiences to their customers." Not everyone is so sure. "I ... believe the trucks tend to be noisy and take away from the ambiance of the neighborhoods," Kip Clayton, an executive at Parasole Restaurant Holdings, said on Speak up Edina W ID /lsoeakuoedina.org /discussons /food- IrUCk- ,AODICS /should -food- trucks- be- altrnvedl ."We are of the mind that food trucks take business away from the many brick and mortar restaurants that already operate in Edina." But food truck owners think brick and mortar businesses and food trucks can coexist because of the differences between the two services. Food trucks can only offer food to go, and most customers are looking for a quick bile, not a sit -down dining experience. "Food trucks should not be restricted in order to protect restaurants from competition," the association says. "In fact, food trucks benefit the local restaurant industry by increasing foot traffic." Other Edina community members agree, saying that the addition of food trucks will only bring more people to the city. Currently, Edina city code doesn't allow food trucks in the community unless there's a special event. While officials say they aren't planning on making a change anytime soon, they still want to know what people think. To weigh in, click here (htlo // soeakuoedino .org!dlscusslonslfood- Irucks) -. I:r p Rrsaiiin] Tricking out food trucks f!bhatrk: kin r nut - toad - trunks ) How Chameleon Concessions has adapted to the role kiol c! from this Biog Hospitality: Test drive - f /arGckAxsnitaldv -tes t- drive) World Street Kitchen validates the food truck first, restaurant second' strategy Retail: Stores on wheels [larina= �relal -store s -w hzF.4s l Want to testa retail concept? Do it from a truck in St. Paul • Exx More Minnesota Tourism Conference brings industry focus to Duluth f/blog /exolore- rnnnesota- COMCAST BUSINESS Minneapolis City Pages Voice Places kbre From Voice Nation Joi I UES Blogs I I I RESTAURANTS ,, I I I I I ISearch MINNEAPOLIS RESTAURANTS I FOOD BLDG I FIND A RESTAURANT I HAPPY HOURS I DEALS I DINING NEWSLETTER I GET MOBILE I RESTAURANT ADS I DATING D` 4 r �a V4 n f� 4461 Dtsh r 100 Favorite 1Nockond brew Duck, Duck, Grey t� Mist No. 47, 1 ound up: Big Duck at Coup TOP '"° La Lorna'n Wuud opening J'Eta t: flay ut�... B LO r7 tar, ales taproom By Kelly Moritz STORKS By Loren Green By Loren Green Food Edina opens online forum to discuss city's ban on food trucks By Keane Amdahl Fri., Jan. 17 2014 at 10:00 AM 36 Comments Categories: Food, Food Truck, Neighborhood Dining, News Tweet �4', �- -- J y�l 21 N ifl[ .,�nuf ... _.... -.___.I Hottest Conversations No, Bachmann didn't say Jesus spoke English 112 Comments M .'1+ 17 mispronounced MN places 94 Comments Gatenby out at KSTP following DWI arrest 202 Comments Fin I I Around The We f-i The city of Edina is asking citizens for their thoughts on mobile dining Will Edina, the city with a standing prohibition on food trucks, finally start to reconsider its stance on the overwhelmingly popular mobile restaurants? The short answer is: not any time soon. While the city of Edina has made it clear that they're not currently proposing any changes to the current food truck rules, they have opened up an online discussion to let the citizens of Edina give their input on the subject. See also: First annual Great Minnesota Food Truck Rally a great success The city has what it calls an "online engagement site" called Spcak U12. Edina!, where questions are posed to the general public. This month they've opened a discussion on whether the people of Edina actually want a food truck presence. Citizens now have until January 31 to go to the websile and address the issue head-on in an online forum that so far has five topics surrounding the issue and a total of 51 responses. The topics up for discussion include whether Should food trucks be allowed at people support food trucks; if allowed, what Soth s France? hours should food trucks be allowed to operate; and where the trucks should be allowed to conduct business. So far the majority of the commenters seem to be largely supportive of food trucks, although several mention certain caveats. One commenter, who is in support of the trucks, suggests Edina should "focus them on the parts of the city where there is not already an abundance of food outlets, or at corporate, school, church, or park based events." Another says, "If done properly, I believe food trucks will attract people to areas and increase sales in businesses, including restaurants. There should be limits on locations, hours, and number." Another commenter, identifying himself as a VP at Parasole, has taken a negative stance on the trucks. According to his comment, "I am with Parasole Restaurant Holdings. We operate several restaurants in Edina. We are of the mind that food trucks take business away from the many brick - and - mortar restaurants that already operate in Edina. Edina's current restaurants are first class and offer great diversity. I also believe the trucks tend to be noisy and take away from the ambiance of the neighborhoods." The moderator for the discussion, identified as Jordan Gilgenbach, posted a message he received from An Nguyen, owner of Rice Paper, located at 5oth and France. According to the restaurateur's letter, "it is extremely difficult just to compete and survive with the multitude of existing restaurants at 5oth and France. To nowbe subjected to the possibility of competition from food trucks, which operate with a fraction of the investment and overhead as well as only maintain their presence in fair weather, is truly unfair." These arguments likely sound familiar to those in the downtown Minneapolis area, where brick - and -mortar restaurants have been fairly vocal about their stance on food trucks. Will the city of Edina eventually give in to consumer demand, or will the voices of the local brick - and - mortars win out? Only time will tell, but if you live in Edina, now is your chance to speak your mind. City Pages on Facebook I Hof Dish on Facebook I Tu+itter I e -retail us GET THE DINING NEWSLETTER The week's top local food news and events, plus interviews with chefs and restaurant owners, dining Ups, and a peek at our print review. enter email j Provisions is Back! OC Weelly The Hot Dish Li 1,878 people Ike The Hot Dish. Facebeek social 2 °* } f Our 100 Favorite ( Minneapolis Dishes I Wic, for one hundred reasons co drool,., Slidashow Hammer & Sickle: The Tour Sonora Grill: The Tour Grain to Glass: Behind the scenes of Twin Cities micro - distilleries More 8111rlsshows» Southern Soul Food OC Weeldy Great food awaits at Table Riverfront Times From the VaLl It t `l.g7enL The Hot Dish Li 1,878 people Ike The Hot Dish. Facebeek social 2 °* } f Our 100 Favorite ( Minneapolis Dishes I Wic, for one hundred reasons co drool,., Slidashow Hammer & Sickle: The Tour Sonora Grill: The Tour Grain to Glass: Behind the scenes of Twin Cities micro - distilleries More 8111rlsshows» ron.fresquez Jan 20, 2014 I have lived in Edina for 20+ years so I have seen Edina grow at a conservative pace. The online forum is evidence of that. I am not sure where the food trucks would set up. Southdale, Centennial Lakes, Cornellia Park water slide. I do patronize the food trucks downtown so I am not anti food truck. I suggest the citizens of Edina should decide. It is our city. Like Reply bkmnus Jan 20, 2014 m . , And that is why I will gladly spend my money at the food trucks that operate as part of the Fulton farmers market three blocks away from the Edina border. It sounds like some places just want to rest on their laurels and fear that better eats may come off of a truck. Like Reply Padre Pienbique from Facebook Jan 18, 2014 1 want them here- Come to St Johns Ave: I don't think the cops even know where this street is! Like Reply Rich Rudin from Facebook Jan 18, 2014 WHO CARES ?! Like Reply Bob B Bopp from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Apparently Edina is only interested in Big Business chains and not the little guy. So much for the "free market ". m idwestex pl ore r81 Like Reply Jan 18, 2014 More like Edina is protecting their tax payers and people that have paid licenses and fees to them for years in order to be ALLOWED to sell food out of a building in Edina. To allow a food truck to park in front of one of their restaurants is a slap in the face to the people who pay the bills for Edina. Also where would people eat in the winter after all the indoor restaurants go bankrupt? Those big business chains you speak of are actually owned locally too and they pay for your cities through their property taxes. Like Reply midwestexplorer81 Jan 17, 2014 Sl It really isn't fair to current restaurant owners to allow food trucks. I've worked for two different small business owners in my life, both food places. The owners aren't rich by any means. Even the big. chains often have local owners. If more and more food trucks are allowed you'll see more and more empty storefronts and a big loss in desperately needed property taxes. The. empty S torefronts are proven to be contagious and they attract criminals. People should think about what kind of neighborhood they want before they say yay for food trucks. Like Reply Marty Rlchle from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 You can't control what the market demandsl Food trucks will continue to kill weak restaurants the same as Netflix killed blockbuster, it's the market. Cities like Edina and Bloomington fear them because it's a threat to their tax dollars. Place like subway in the MOA are paying upwards of $35,000 a year, that's one small little place so can you imagine what the total annual dollar at stake looks like. Like Reply midwestexplorer81 Jan 17, 2014 Except it's not the market. :A brick and mortar owner has way more expenses. For a true C " market competition either regs and fees need to be reduced on shop owners or either regs and fees need to go way up on food trucks. Right now the government basically has brick and mortar owners hand's tied behind their backs with regulations. Like Reply BigLex SouthSide Wherevalmat from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 That's s0000 Edina... no food trucks, fine dining only please._ snobs! Like Reply ron.fres uez Jan 19, 2014 Vie, q. iw Nobody is forcing you to come to Edina. Stay in your trailer park in Circle Pines. You belong there. We are doing just fine without people like you. Edina only has municipal liquor stores and that is another thing I like about Edina. Edina is very selective when it issues liquor licenses and I like that also.. If it was not for the rift raff that comes to Southdale to commit crimes Edina would have an even lower crime rate than the already low crime rate it currently has. Like Reply Snag Jan 20, 2014 Speaking as someone who grew up in Edina and now lives in Circle Pines: 1. There aren't any trailer parks in Circle Pines; 2. Many of the people who live in Circle Pines, and in trailer parks, are just as smart, hard - working, and law - abiding as their counterparts in Edina; and 3. If you wanted to be'a caricature of the reason people don't like Edina, mission accomplished. Like Reply ron.fresquez Jan 21, 2014 - -wW ._ @Snag mobile home parks in circle pines mn https: / /www.google.com / #q= mobile +home +parks +in +circle +pines +mn Restwood Terrace Mobile HomE www.mhvillage.com 3631 91 st Dr NE Circle Pines, MN (763) 786 -7366 Paul Revere Community prcoop.org 3832 Boston Ln Lexington, MN (763) 784 -8193 Baldwin Lake Estates summitre. net Snag @ron.fresquez Like Reply Jan 22, 2014 Circle Pines is simply the post office for 55014. None of the parks is in the city. Restwood is in Blaine. Paul Revere is in Lexington. Baldwin Lake Estates is in Lino Lakes. That said, there are decent people in all those places, as well as jerks. Just like Edina. Like Reply Alex Browne from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 k Welcome to the great land of the United state. This is how laws were meant to be decided. Laws representing the views of the people within the voting area. If you don't like then move to Zimbabwe. Smaller government is never a bad thing. 1 ,& Like Reply Melissa Barnes from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 e'er Diamond tennis bracelets don't look nice with mustard. y� Like Reply ItIVS, eddogg67 Jan 17, 2014 Edina should just surround themselves with high walls and guard towers. Let them be their own city state. The pretentious _ can then be on their own private island so to speak! Like Reply . Reler Erickson from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 didn't know they had Cake Food Trucks... Like Reply Angela Salzi from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 I get it. I think its primarily because they perfer business stay within the city for a higher value stand point...... that I do understand. however, I love the ability to get different food without, traveling far like a food truck offers! and the food is always delicious. but Edina is a bit of older money who. are accustomed to a certain way. so I am not surprised at all. 1; Like Reply Kris Raff from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 E. very. D. ay. I. N.eed.A.ttention... Like Reply brill029 Jan 17, 2014 y Grill Works Truck from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Oil I may have, a bias opinion Like Reply Grill Works Truck from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Seems like a double standard to me. Restaurants are Ok, food trucks are not? Like Reply Melissa Barnes from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 e'er Diamond tennis bracelets don't look nice with mustard. y� Like Reply ItIVS, eddogg67 Jan 17, 2014 Edina should just surround themselves with high walls and guard towers. Let them be their own city state. The pretentious _ can then be on their own private island so to speak! Like Reply . Reler Erickson from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 didn't know they had Cake Food Trucks... Like Reply Angela Salzi from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 I get it. I think its primarily because they perfer business stay within the city for a higher value stand point...... that I do understand. however, I love the ability to get different food without, traveling far like a food truck offers! and the food is always delicious. but Edina is a bit of older money who. are accustomed to a certain way. so I am not surprised at all. 1; Like Reply Kris Raff from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 E. very. D. ay. I. N.eed.A.ttention... Like Reply brill029 Jan 17, 2014 y "To now be subjected to the possibility of competition from food trucks, which operate with a fraction of the investment and overhead as well as only maintain their presence in fair weather, is truly unfair." I AM THREATENED BY A SUPERIOR BUSINESS MODEL, SAVE ME GOVERNMENT! 2 S & Like Reply ft midwestexplorer81 Jan 17, 2014 @bri11029Are you going to pay higher property taxes or higher rent to pay your g s' landlord's taxes when all the small business owners currently paying taxes shut down because you want to stuff your face at a food truck instead of a table? That is what it will come down to. That is what you should be asking yourself. Like ,Reply Andrew Sass from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Edina sucks. = Edina, Like Reply Pete St Martin from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Gotta change with the times. No one selling covered wagons is trying to ban cars. Like Reply Marie Cyr Anderson from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 ;a. 1 loved foxy falafel truck at centennial lakes. Ban the ban. Like Reply Daren L. MN from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Edina has many outdated laws regarding business that reinforce the "snooty suburb" stereotype it often gets. Change!! Like Reply Leif Lundeen from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Surprised Edina hasn't requested a diamond covered gate around the town to keep.horrible things like food trucks, city people, etc out. 1 , Like Reply Dan Zeug from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Edina sucks! f! ! i Like Reply Dare n. L. MN from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Food trucks don't belong in suburbia? Why would a businessperson not want to serve all the commercial business parks in suburbia during lunch? Seems like Capitalism 101. 1 U Like Reply Steve Jan 17, 2014 Q The VP of Parasole's concerns over Edina's laws are curious, considering the restaurants operating at 50th & France are only a stone's throw from the Mpls border where food truck restrictions are limited. Chef Shack operates every Saturday when the Fulton Farmers Market is in season, .and this is a mere 3 -4 block'walk from their establishments. I'm hopeful the food truck ban will go the way of the happy hour ban in Edina. - Steve, an Edina Resident, and apparently a pretentious- 1 Like Reply chuckmcgu Jan 17, 2014 r,nn° @Steve Don't really like food trucks, but really like the signature Like Reply Craig Kent from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 Ban Edina, makes more sense. Like Reply Joshua Warren from Facebook Jan 17, 2014 1 love food trucks, but they don't belong in suburbia as a permanent fixture. The premise for food trucks is restaurant style variety in densely populated urban business areas. I could see them allowing food trucks for special events such as carnivals, concerts, etc. but not for daily service. 1 Like Reply gN balance55113 Jan 17, 2014 Edina sucks anyway! A bunch of pretentious =! 10 Like Reply. N Jordan Gilgenbach From: Mark Karason <karason.mark @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:29 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: No to Food Trucks Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Jordan.Gilgenbach On the subject of mobile food trucks in our neighborhood, we invite you to visit with the restaurant owners and hear what they have to say on the matter. Sit at one of their tables and talk to their staff. Would you like to see them close their doors and send their employees elsewhere? It is at be a very "band- wagon jumping" marketing decision to consider allowing these mobile food vendors to do business in. our neighborhood. We believe that there already. exists a charm and a unique food culture here and we enjoy supporting it with our appetites and our partnership. It is an unfair advantage for someone to be able to come in and set up a restaurant during prime time without the commitment that we've all put in to our brick and mortar. businesses. We're not against food trucks. We do think Edina needs a vibrant food scene, our only issue with that is that we're already have a solid base of committed restaurateurs who are valuable members of the community. Food trucks have little, if any, investment in our community and do not provide a stable tax base for the city. Our many restaurant owners have committed time, resources, and millions of dollars in the 50th & France neighborhood. It is unfair to allow food trucks, with little or no investment in the business community to poach the lunch and dinner business at their leisure. Mark Karason OSKA —Edina karason.mark c0mail.com 651 - 226 -5399 RME Jordan Gilgenbach From: Bill Neuendorf Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:21 PM To: 'Klaus C. Freyinger'; Rachel Thelemann; Jordan Gilgenbach Cc: KCS Management; Haugland Gene; Kent Jenifer; Nelson James W.; John john.breitinger @cushwakenm.com; Dan.Coyle @kimley- horn.com Subject: RE: Should Edina allow food trucks at 50th & France... Follow Up Flag: Follow Up Flag Status: Flagged Thanks for your opinion and insight Klaus! I'll forward to the City's Communication Dept who is tracking this issue. Bill N Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager 952- 826 -04071 Fax 952 -826 -03901 Cell 952 - 491 -1143 BNeuendorf(o)EdlnaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.aov ..For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Klaus C: Freyinger [mailto:kffreyinger0mac.com] Sent: Tuesday, January. 14, 2014 11;18 PM To: Rachel Thelemann Cc: Bill Neuendorf; KCS Management; Haugland Gene; Kent Jenifer; Nelson James W.; John john.breitinger cushwakenm.com; Dan.CoyleCalkimley- horn.com Subject: Fwd: Should Edina allow food trucks at 50th & France... Importance: High Rachel, I think the idea of introducing food trucks to the. Edina business district, is not a good one and should be abandoned asap. I think it would potentially hurtthe businesses of restaurants in the are at least temporarily. My son is an independent architect who works and lives in Venice Beach / CA. The introduction of food trucks there caused a lot of commotion, and this is why: There will be a problem with toilets, because food trucks'aie not required -to have toilets. But we all agree, that where there is food, there ought to be toilets. There is typically a mess from thrown away napkins, plastic flatware, paper plates etc. And the local merchants get upset, because they pay the taxes. There are only a few places, where it works. One of them Santa Monica, where they use a parking lot. I do not think we' have the opportunity here in Edina. Here is a statement fi•om my son: "After some initial excitement we now go home, when the food trucks show up. 1 There is also a persona lobservation by me: In NY on 5th Ave. I counted a line of 40 people in front of a food truck. Figure l .minute per customer and You arrive at a wait of 40 minutes, but probably more. Do we want that in Edina? NO WAY ! ! ! Do not even think about it. Klaus C. Freyinger for France Ave. Patinership kffreyinger@mac.com Begin forwarded message: From: Rachel Thelemann <directorCc).50thandfrance.com> Subject: Should Edina allow food trucks at 50th & France... Date: January 10, 2014 10:31:59 AM CST To: Rachel Thelemann <director ,50thandfrance.com> Good Morningl The City is currently holding an online discussion about what residents and businesses think about the possibility of Edina allowing food trucks. Being Edina's thriving downtown business district, we need to hear from business leaders and what you think about this idea. Please take the time to respond, click on the attached link below. http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=pressroom pressreleases &prrid =581 http: / /speakupedina.org /discussions /food- trucks Thanksl Rachel Rachel Thelemann Executive Director 50th & France Business Association I Edina Art Fair, (952)922-1524 Phone 1 (952)922-4413 Fax I directorCa��othandfiance.com www.5othandfrance.com rail ui c4 .. . R d w ca F� Fuctwok ° • + ®FaceWok a Best Neighborhood Shopping Area voted by Minnesota Monthly 2012. Voted 2011 Best Eat, Shop, Play by A4pls /St.Paul Magazine. Best Place to Take Out =of -Town Guests by Edna Magazine 2011. Art Fair Source book ranked the Edina A ►•t FAir #1 in 144N and 32nd in the nation for 2013. Sunshine Artist ranked the Edina Art Fair the #48 best art fair in the country & ranked, #69 out of the Top 100 Fine Art Fairs by the Art Fair SourceBook 2 1 _ � J h� f _ Search is T® o�`'e F1 TheCITYOf )y EDINA • "P ° .. ..For living, learning, raising families & doing business About Edina City Offices City Government News & Publications Calendar Parks & Places Blogs Resources I About the Author Scott Neal began work as Edina City Manager In 2010. Prior to joining the City stag, he served as City Manager of Eden Prairie since 2002. He has also held the positions of CltyAdminls Bator for the communities of Northfield, tklnn; W Pleasant, Iowa; and Norris. Tenn. Neal was the first City Managers In Minnesota, and one of the first in the country. to share his experiences and observations In city govemmenl In a blog and has travelled Internationally to speak about his experiences with leadership blogging. Follow Scott Neal on Twiner, fa!edinacitvman scottNeal— postedhw Janoary24,2014 0 Subscribe to 06 RSS teed City Manager Scott Neal's Blog Food Truck Discussion Scott Neal, January 24, 2014 1 Posted In Scott Neal There Is a communitydialogue tool on the CiVs website called 'Speak Up, Edina / ". We use the tool a couple ofdifferent ways. One wayispassive. We wall and see what residents bring to us. The second Is active. We bring an Issue to residents and encourage them to share their thoughts, comments and opinions with us. We've started a new initiative this year to be more active In our use of Speak Up, Ednal We have idenfifhed a hand full of community is sues that residents might be IMorseled In and that are In som o level of cons ideration or flux. We will aotiwtya ask thoughts, comm ants and opinions on the Issue. We will highlight one of these community issues each month. Then, we will Share the feedback and Input with the CIV Council at a City Council meeting the tofiowing month. Then, we will move an to another Issue the next month. The Speak. Up Edinal Issue for Januaryis Food Trucks. Currently. Edina's cityregulatory environment is not accomdoallng of food trucks. We gat questions and suggestions every summer that we ought to be more open to food trucks. What do you think? Care to join the cenversation, dick here: htip•I/ speakupedina .org /discussionslfoodarucks The Council maydedde to take up the Issue for serious discussion or let it layrighl where It Is, depending on the tone and content of this conversation. If you have thoughts or opinions on this Issue, regardless of what theyam, I encourage you to engage, and speak up. One Response to Food Truck Discussion Shirley Ramberg says: January 27, 2014 at 7:32 pm (Edit) I don't think Edina Is a place for food trucks, period. It's not big enough for the manysmall restaurants and the bucks too. It would take away business from the current restaurants, who I suspect some are struggling with the economy, higher rent and taxes an their properlytoo. I connect food trucks with a large cityscape where'restaurants are sometimes hard to find and there Is much more foot traffic then what downtown Edina has. Keep the city like it Is. Asa former employee In downtown Edina, I talked to many people who loved to come shopping because of the quiet atmosphere and quafilybusinesses. Unfortunatelysome of them have left since then. Leave a Reply Logged In as Jordan Gllgenbach. Log out? Comment DISCLAIMER: We welcome anyand all comments and Interaction on this page. However, posts will be moderated. Posters shall nolmisrepresenl their Identitynor Impersonate anyperson. Comments associated with unlawful activityor that contain offensive or vulgar language or photos, personal attacks on staff members A Print cityElogs City Manager Scott Neal's Blog 290 posts ,AP -Edina as q* Liquor B10 41 posts EFD Pulse Blog 42 posts Parks & Recreati 107 posts Police Chief Jeff Long's Blog 70 posts Public Works 23 posts e � .Blog 1 28 posts d % R : PORT / ' COO MM I�TDIATI®N To: Mayor & City Council From: Joyce Repya; Senior Planner Date: February 18, 2014 WI 4tb.P,,0s in y ,- - Jea * ��FO o ,aa ' Agenda Item #: VI. A. Subject: PUBLIC HEARING — 2014 Community Development Block Grant, Resolution No. 2014 -22 Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Approve recommended 2014 CDBG budget for submission to Hennepin County. Information / Background: The CDBG Community Development Block Grant Program is a federal entitlement program administered by HUD who in turn, charges Hennepin County to oversee the distribution of funds to its communities. These funds are to be directed toward the improvement of housing opportunities and providing a suitable living environment for persons with low and moderate incomes. Asa recipient of HUD funds, the County, and each community must affirmatively further fair ous housing: Hennepin County encourages all communities to be proactive by addressing impediments to fair housing choices. The use of CDBG funds to address local needs must be consistent with priorities identified in the Consolidated Plan for affordable housing, community development and human services. HUD mandates that no more than 15% of the city's budget may be directed toward funding public service agencies with the remaining 85% addressing community development needs. Edina's preliminary 2014 budget allotment for planning purposes is $124,671, the 2013 approved budget amount. Once HUD establishes the 2014 CDBG budget later this spring Hennepin County and its respective cities will be notified of any changes to the allotments. If a change in the budget occurs, a paragraph in the accompanying Resolution provides for Edina's final 2014 CDBG budget to be readjusted without coming back to the City Council. The following agencies requesting 2014 CDBG funds are those which the City has supported for many years: Public Services — 15% of total ($124,671) budget = $18,700 m Senior Community Services (HOME — Household & Outside Maintenance for the Elderly) The mission.of HOME is to assist older adults to maintain their dignity and live independently by providing accessible, reliable, and affordable homemaker, home maintenance and chore services. o Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) CAPSH provides full -cycle homeownership services to include foreclosure prevention; first time homebuyer education, reverse mortgage counseling, home repair and maintenance, energy assistance, free legal services and tax preparation, employment counseling and financial /budget counseling. REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 2. • HOME Line Provides tenant advocacy services for Edina renters with a Tenant Hotline offering free legal advice to tenants regarding tenant/landlord law. The proposed 2014 budget,reflects the funds distributed to each agency in final 201.3 allotment. PROVIDER 2013 2014 2014 BUDGET REQUEST PROPOSED H.O.M.E. $ 10,095 $ 10,095 $ 10,095 C..A.P.S.H. $ 5,000 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 HOME Line $ 3,605 $ 3,605 $ 3;605 TOTAL $ 18,700 $ 18,700 $ 18,700 Community Development— 85 %'of total ($124,671) budget= $ 1 05,971 After the $18,700.distribution for public services, $105,971_ remains to be directed toward community development projects. Staff recommends directing $50,000 of those funds to the Rehabilitation of Private Property program which provides deferred.repayment loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner :occupied single - family homes. Eligibility for the program is.based on a household income schedule establish, ed by HUD•for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not exceed 80% of the median household income,.(for FY 2014, a.4 person household = $63,900). Hennepin County facilitates this program and reports that.there�are currently 3 households receiving rehabilitation assistance. There is no one on awaiting list at this time; and there is currently $97,000 available in uncommitted funds. As the construction season ramps up, staff anticipates that the program will continue to attract income eligible homeowners interested in improving and maintaining their homes. The remaining $55,971,of the - community development funds are recommended to be distributed to West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) for their Homes Within Reach program — which provides an affordable homeownership opportunity using the Community Land Trust model for one income eligible homebuyer. The Community Land Trust model removes the market value of the land from the mortgage equation, thus reducing the cost of a home for a work -force family by approximately 30 -50 percent, making it more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. WHAHLT owns the land and the homeowner, owns the home. A Ground Lease signed by both parties defines and secures the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT and the homeowner, including, but not limited to a resale /recapture provision, and long -term rights and use of the land. One of the strategies identified in the Housing element of the Comprehensive Plan calls for the City's commitment to fund and expand its financial and technical support of community land trusts. Attesting to this goal, since 2007, the City has_.provided $747,350 in CDBG assistance to WHAHLT - assisting in the purchase, rehabilitation and resale of nine Edina homes to income eligible. buyers. Moving forward, the proposed $55,971 is proposed to be directed toward assisting WHAHLT to purchase another land trust home, reinforcing the City's commitment to providing and securing affordable housing in the community. Staff recommends the following distribution of 2014 CDBG funds for community development purposes: ACTIVITY 2013 2014 BUDGET PROPOSED Rehab. Of Private Property $ 50,000 $ 50,000 WHAHLT $ 55,971 $ 55,971 TOTAL $ 105,971 $105,971 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Over the past year, the city has continued to advertise the availability of the aforementioned programs as well as other social services available to Edina residents through the City of Edina's website and the "About Town" magazine. ATTACHMENTS: *Resolution 2014 -22 *Hennepin County PRELIMINARY 2014 CDBG Allocation *2009 - 2014 CDBG Budget Breakdown *Requesting Agencies Funding Requests RESOLUTION NO. 2014-22 APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2014 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNENPIN.000NTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, the city of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program;'and WHEREAS, the city of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the city held a public hearing on February 18, 2014 to obtain the views of citizens on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of $124,671 from the 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the following projects for funding from the 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County. Activity Budget Rehabilitation of Private Property $50,000 Homes Within Reach — Affordable Housing $55,971 Senior Community Services $10,095 Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) $ 5,000 HOME Line $ 3,605 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and its City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2014 Community Development Block Grant Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that should the final amount of FY2014 CDBG available to the city be different from the preliminary amount provided to the city, the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager /Administrator to adjust project budget(s) to reflect an increase or decrease in funding. Dated: February 18, 2014 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street a Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 - 927 -8861 a Fax 952 - 826 -0390 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ C:\ Users \pwc2861AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \1 L07V3EZ \ESTIMATED 2014 Alloc cities Conpool.xlsx Hennepin County PRELIMINARY 2014 C®RG Allocatio Community. --B—a-s—ed on 2013 Allocation Brooklyn Center $239,249 Brooklyn Park $477,677 Crystal $106,088 Edina $124,671 Hopkins $111,861 Maple Grove $133,915 New Hope $133,964 Richfield $201,637 St. Louis Park $195,859 Subtotal $1,724,921 Consolidated. Pool $451,149 $2,1 76,U7U ommun► y oca ion Totat Hennepin County Administration $325,159 County Entitlement Total 2,501,229 C:\ Users \pwc2861AppData \Local \Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook \1 L07V3EZ \ESTIMATED 2014 Alloc cities Conpool.xlsx CDBG BUDGET 2009-2013 Page 1 PROPOSED .2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 CDBG BUDGET .- $161;303 ( +1.5 %) $173,786 ( +7.7 %) $145,365 (- 16.1 %) $110,285 (- 24:1 %) . $124,671 ( +13 %) $124,671 Public Service: 15% $23,843 $26,067 $21,805 $16,543 $18,700 $18,700 Sr. Comm: Services - H.O.M.E. $12,803 $17,789 $14,880 $9,618 $10,095 $10,095 CAPSH $3,505 $5,624 $4,700 $4,700 $5;000 $5,000 HOME Line $2,030 $2,654 $2,225 $2,225 $3,605 $3,605 JVS Career Development $5,505 Community Development: 85% $137,460 $147,719 $123,560 $93,742 $105,971 $105,971 Rehab of Private =Property $55,460 $65,719 $54,985 $41,891 $50,000 $50,000 Affordable Housing WHAHLT $82,000 $82,000 $68,575 $52,251 $55,971 $55,971 Page 1 Senior Reimagine Aging Community Services Executive Committee Woody Love President Thad Standley 1stVice President Laurie Lafontaine 2nd Vice President Beth Falkenberg Secretary Bruce Thiel Treasurer Terri Urbaniak Executive Member -at -Large Matt Bochnicek Executive Member -at -Large Jim Crist Past President Board of Directors Sharon Burnham David Fisher Rochelle Gill Marvin Johnson John Lawson Cathy Medich Jeanette Metz Dr. Chinyere Njaka Gen Olson Walter White : Scott Zerby Deb Taylor, CEO Programs • Caregiver Support Services • Community Senior Centers • Health Insurance Counseling • H.O.M.E. • Senior Outreach • Senior Partners Care 10201 Wayzata Boulevard Suite 335 Minnetonka, MN 55305 fax: 952.541.0841 tel: 952.541.1019 www.seniorcommunity.org January 21, 2014 Joyce Repya Senior Planner City of Edina -4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Joyce, Thank you for the opportunity to submit a CDBG application to the City of Edina for $10,095. The Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) program's operating budget for the City of Edina is $26,000. The Edina Housing Foundation has partnered with the HOME program in the past to make up the difference in our operating budget for the city. HOME provides the following services to help seniors remain independent and continue to lead a vital and engaging life: Homemaking (dishwashing, laundry, grocery shopping, cleaning) Yard work Snow removal Indoor & outdoor painting Minor home repairs/handyman services Safety improvements Your consideration of this request is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or need more information please feel free to call me at 952- 767 -7897 or email me at d.taylor o,seniorcommuni ..org. Sincerely, REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014 General Information: City. Edina Co- Applicant: Senior Community Services Type of Entity: Public Su recipient Project Name: Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly HOME Contact: De Tay or Phone: 952 - 767 -7897 'Activity Data: _ (Per counca resolution, i(epplirable) - - CDBG Funding Reque $ 10,095.00 Resolution: 2014 -22 Is this an existing CDBG- funded project] Yes Project Location: 10201 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 335, Minnetonka, MN 55305 Describe below the activity In detail, Including priority need(s) It meets within the 2010.2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click link below. 2010 -2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Chapter 5 1 - Let's reimagine aging[ By working together, we are creating anew vision for independence, keeping the passion, purpose and potential of our older adults in our communities. As family, friends and neighbors age, we all have a shared responsibility to strengthen their connection to community. We join together open- hearted people who are ready to stop and listen, stand by and support the caregiver, and champion the senior's pursuit to lead an engaging life. Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) services will enable older adults in need of a little help with home maintenance, homemaking and chore services to lead a vital and engaging life in the place they call home. Services are provided to Edina residents, age 60 +, on a sliding fee basis. Over 80% of HOME clients are unable to pay the full cost of services. For them, HOME is a lifesaver that helps them age with dignity in their own homes and communities. Some services are provided at no -cost by volunteer groups. With our partners, we seek to build innovative systems that create new opportunities for care and community connection. Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) helps seniors remain in their homes in dignity and safety by providing reliable and affordable homemaking, grab bars & other safety installations, minor repairs, exterior home maintenance, interior and exterior painting, yard work, lawn mowing, and snow removal. Senior Services is identified as a high priority in the Consolidated Plan. Please choose the activity, and national objective that this project will meet from the drop down lists below. The activity priority level is noted next to each dropdown Item as: H (High), M (Medium), Lf low). Activity: Senior -H National Objective: L/M Income Limited Clientele lithe proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority In your community. Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have: We anticipate serving 80 Edina residents, age 60 +. Here is a sample of the impact our Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) program has on the people we serve. "I'll always remember your kindness." - Elaine Senior Community Services loves getting feedback from the seniors and families we serve. Elaine, who is 86 and has lived in her own home for 59 years, found Senior Community Services' HOME program to be very helpful. "My thank -you seems so small compared to what you folks did for me. I was overwhelmed and so appreciative. Your volunteers raked, cut, bundled and bagged my yard waste. HOME is a fabulous program to help seniors remain in their own homes." Approximate number of persons to receive services: 80 p 7 ` ` Date: Implementation schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during /within the first 12 months. Printed Name: Deb Taylor Task: Homemaking Date: Year Around Task: Home Maintenance & Painting Date: Year Around Task: Mowing Date: Summer Task: Snow Removal Date: Winter Task: Yard Clean Up (raking, weeding, trimming, etc) Date: Spring & Fall Task: - Date: Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. CDBG $ '1P,09.5.00 ( Edina CDBG IPriorYearCDBG Funding -This Project, - '$10,095 Edina CDBG Other (Government) 207137100 Other (United Way) 34,000.00 l Other (Individual Donations) 19,500.00 1 ' ',Other(ProgramRevenue) _ 300,000.00 Other (In -Kind Volunteer Service Hours) "91,200.00-1 _ Project Total $ 662,167.001 Signature: p 7 ` ` Date: 1/21/2014 Printed Name: Deb Taylor Title: CEO Energy Assistance Homebuyer Education Foreclosure Prevention Reverse Mortgage Home Maintenance & Rehab Homeless Services Employment Counseling Financial Counseling Planning &-Development Community Development Tax Assistance Voter Education & Registration Asset Development 8800 Highway 7, Suite 401 St Louis Park, MN 55426 Tel 952 -697 -1300 Fax 952 - 933 -8016 K t... Helping People. Changing Lives. * . community c cto� P A R T N E R S H I P ancr OF SUBURBAN HENNEPIN AAIV�s POVEM FIGHMG NEf WORK January 24, 2014 City of Edina Community Development Department 4801 W. 50'b Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner RE: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin 2014 Application for CDBG Funding Dear Ms. Repya: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH) is pleased to submit its 2014 CDBG Public Service Funding request to the City of Edina. We are requesting $5,000 for the purpose of funding the CAPSH Full -Cycle Home Ownership Program. CAPSH, as the anti- poverty Community Action agency serving Suburban Hennepin County, has provided residents of Edina with services for over 20 years. CAPSH services to Edina include: full -cycle homeownership, energy assistance, free legal services and tax preparation, employment counseling and financial/budget counseling. We look forward to continuing to partner with the city of Edina and its surrounding communities to ensure access to housing services for low to moderate - income households. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 952 -697 -1395, or Marcy Harris, Director of Planning, Development and.Legal Services, 952- 697 -1325, mharris @capsh.org. SinCGt/ Carol Watson Community Developer 952 - 697 -1395 cwatson @capsh.org Encl: Our mission: To Improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin County by erecting and supporting links between Individuals and communities through: service, education, and collaboration. REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014 City: Edina Co- Applicant: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin Type of Entity: Private Subreciplent Non - Profit Project Name: CAPSH Full -Cycle Homeownership Programs Contact: Marcy Harris Phone: 952- 697 -1325 . 'Activity Data:"' _, Iper coundl resolution, if applioble) CDBG Funding Reque $ 5,000.00 Resolution: 2014 -22 Is this an existing CDBG- funded project? Yes Project Location: City of Edina Descrlbe below the activity In detall Including priority needs) It meets within the 20162014 Henneplp Caunty Ccinsolldated Plan Click link below. 2010 -2014 Henne p in Coun Foreclosure Prevention: through Its certified program and certified counselors CAPSH will provide foreclosure prevention counselin Edina residents in danger of losing their homes due to delinquency. Our counselors work directly with clients to resolve their housing needs in a manner best suited to their financial status and other needs. • Counselors work with clients from Initial stages of facing foreclosure through sheriffs sales land even provide counseling up to eviction following the redemption period). • Significant counseling time Is devoted to reviewing clients' financial situations to evaluate if they are able to maintain their current housing In the long run. • Counselors work directly with clients and their lenders to renegotiate mortgage terms that allow clients to stay in their homes when feasible. Foreclosure prevention counselors work with lenders to negotiate mortgage modifications, refinancing, short sales and other means of resolving the homeowner's housing crisis. Estimated # of households to be served: 10 Homebuyer Education: CAPSH provides First -Time Homebuyer workshops using the Homestretch curriculum developed by the Minnesota Homeownership Center. Workshops are offered at multiple locations throughout suburban Hennepin County in order to make them easily accessible. • Workshops are offered in multiple - session evening classes or single - session workshops. • Participants review budget and financial considerations, what things to look for when purchasing, and options for financing. Participants also learn about repair and maintenance Issues to consider before and after a purchase. • Participants hear from real estate agents and lenders about the home - buying process from their perspective, giving participants Insight Into what to expect. • Homebuyer workshops total 8 hours, after which time the clients receive certificates of completion. Many lenders now require first -time homebuyers complete the workshop to ensure they understand the lending process and their financial obligations. Estimated # of households to be served: 6 omebuyer Counseling: once participants have completed the Homestretch workshop they are eligible to receive Individual counseling at CAPSH. Counselors examine a client's financial status in more detail, and work with clients to develop budgets and work on credit repair, with the goal of positioning clients to obtain home purchase • Counseling may take. place In different time Increments to allow clients time to Improve their credit. • Clients meet with the counselor In 45 minute — 2 hour Increments depending on needs and circumstances. Estimated # of households to be served: 6 Reverse Mortgage: CAPSH provides one-on -one, In- person counseling to eligible clients (one spouse must be at least 62 years old and meet financial eligibility requirements) who are Interested In a reverse mortgage. • The Reverse Mortgage counselor meets with seniors Interested In the program to discuss with them the nature and requirements of a reverse mortgage, available options, and the consequences of taking out this mortgage. The counselor provides Information about how to work with lenders. • CAPSH does not endorse taking a reverse mortgage, nor does It endorse particular lenders or products. Estimated # of households to be served: 4 Home Repair and Maintenance: the Home Rehab counselor works with low- Income clients In need of critical home repairs or maintenance needed to maintain habitabillity. • Counselor provides advice about what types of repairs are necessary, how to obtain suitable contractors, and how to obtain financial assistance, particularly through municipal programs. • The counselor may work with city housing authorities to advise the client on necessary repairs, review the work after completion, and certify whether the work was appropriately completed. • This Is a much - needed service for low- income homeowners who may not be able to determine on their own the repair work needed, or how to pick out a legitimate contractor. Estimated # of households to be served: 2 Please choose the activity, and national objective that this project will meet from the drop down lists below. The activity priority level Is noted next to each dropdown Item I as: H (High), M (Medium), L (Low). Activity: Housing Services -H National objective: L/M Income Limited Clientele If the proposed project Is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority in your community. ;Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have: . 10 households obtain assistance to resolve their housing crises in a realistic, appropriate manner. Education: 6 households obtain the information they need to make intelligent decisions regarding first -time home purchases. Purchase Counseling: 9 households improve their credit, build realistic budgets and are in position to purchase a home for the first time. Reverse Mortgage: 4 households obtain the information and counseling they need to make an informed decision about obtaining a reverse mortgage. Approximate number of persons to receive services: 28 Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/wlthin the first 12 months. Task: Homeownership Counseling (foreclosure, reverse mortgage, 1st time homebuyer) Date: Ongoing Task: Homebuyer Education Date: Ongoing Task: Home Repair and Maintenance Services Date: Ongoing Task: Date: Task: Date: Task: D_ a_t_e: B Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. FUNDING 5- OURCES '-- - - - -"--- ' - - - AMOUNT -- SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE _.—..—.._—'---- CDBG $ 5,000..- 00 Edma CDBG Funding -This Project - 5000.00 Edina CDBG OiorYearCDEG NFMC/MHA Foreclosure counseling funding I. 92 500.00 IlHUD /Neighborworks administered by MN Homeownership Center other: her: other CDBG Funding 25 000.00 „ I Henn Cty Consolidated Pool; other city CDBG funds Other: Community Action grants I _ _ 213 000.00 _ _ - I US Dept of Health &Human Services; MN Dept of Human Services __. ,Other: MN Housing Counseling grant 87,500.00. MN Housing Finance Agency ;Other: Homebuyer Education fees 13,000.00 Participants- , f Other: Hennepin County Foreclosure Assistance 215,000.00 (Hennepin County I Signature: /s/ Marcy L. Harris Date: 1/24/2014 Printed Name: Marcy Harris Title: Director, Planning, Dev. & Legal Svc. 3455 Bloomington Ave Minneapolis, MN 55407 Joyce Repya Associate Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Ms. Repya, Office Phone: 612/728 -5770 Hotline: 612/728 -5767 Fax: 612/728 -5761 www:homelinemn.org January 10, 2014 This letter is to request funding in the amount of $3,605 from the City of Edina's Community Development Block Grant Program to support HOME Line's services for renters. A copy of the 2014 CDBG Program Request for Funding is enclosed. Along with the CDBG Request Form, I am enclosing summaries of our hotline's service to Edina residents. The total cost to provide these services to the city of Edina is $4,253. If the city of Edina, receives more CDBG resources than is currently expected, we would like to request this full amount. In 2013, HOME Line's Tenant Hotline served 110 Edina families, prevented an estimated 6 evictions, and saved Edina residents an estimated $20,309. HOME Line is working to meet the current challenges facing low- income renters and would like the City of Edina to continue as our partner in meeting these needs. We thank you for the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 612/728 -5770, extension 107 or Mike Vraa, our managing attorney at extension 113. Sincerely, Beth Kodluboy Executive Director enclosures as noted Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014 General Information: City: -.. Edina _ Co- Applicant: HOME Line Type of Entity: Private Subrecipient Non Profit Project Name: Tenant Hotline Services Contact: Mike Vraa, Managing Attorney /Hotline Director Phone: 612 728 -5770 x107 �Activlty Data: (per council resolution, It appilca_ble) CDBG Funding Reque $ 3,605.00 Resolution: 2014 -22 Is this an existing CDBG- funded project? Yes Project Location: 3455 Bloomington Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55407 HOME Line's tenant services are citywide. Tenants call Describe below the activity In detail, Including priorlij need(s) It meets within the 2010.2014 Hennepin County, Consolidated Plan. Click link below. X2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Chanter 5 :ers make up nearly 5,436 households In Edina, and many of these families have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes, those don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose security deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make decisions that them their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable. Line's Tenant Hotline provides free legal advice to tenants about landlord /tenant law. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to from unsafe living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources. The Tenant Hotline began in 1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin County residents. Today we serve the entire state (excluding Minneapolis) and have recently taken our 159,000th call. Five full time and one half -time staff attorneys work on the hotline along with 50 -75 law student volunteers each year. 110 Edina renter households called in.2013. We helped to prevent an estimated 6 evictions of Edina families. The most common reasons Edina residents call our hotline are repairs, security deposits, break lease questions, and evictions. The need for this service in Edina is apparent — Edina residents already rely on this valuable service. While our services are available to all renters free of charge, 88% of our Edina callers have low incomes; almost three quarters (79 %) of these callers are women; 12% are racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low- income renters. We identify the key demographics at the beginning of each call. please rhonsp the artivlty_ and national ehipttivp that this nrnlert will mppt from the dron down lists hpinw_ Thp activity nrinrlty 1p 1 is nntad next to oaeh dr —crown Itpm �'as: H (High), M (Medium), L (Low). Activity: Housing Services -H National Objective: L/M Income Area Benefit If the proposed project Is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority in your community. Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have: We anticipate assisting approximately 100 Edina renter households, 250 residents over the hotline during the program year. We expect to prevent approximately 6 evictions, and save these families over $15,000 in returned security deposits and rent abatements. Approximate number of persons to receive services: 250 implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/within the first 12 months. Task: Tenant Hotline Services Task: Task: Task: Task: Task: Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. Date: Ongoing Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: r FUNDING SOURCES ^_ ^ AMOUNT VT j SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE CDBG FY2014 Proposed _ $ — 68,334.00 — - - -1 FrlorYearCDBGFunding -This Project `I 68334.00 i Other MHFA " I 200,000.0-0- _ ICounty(FHPAPandforedosure .. c - -- - - _ ", Municipal Eden Prelrle Minnetonka, 8loomington „5500000` I 16,250.00 - - -_ Private (see attached) ) 242,760.00.1 " Other. (see attache d) L 37,086.001 Project Total; $ 587,764.00 i _! Awl .Z'rc�fi� Signature: Date: 1/9/2014 Printed Name: Beth Kodluboy Title: Executive Director HOME Line's Tenant Hotline in Edina: 2013 OVERVIEW In 2013, 110 Edina renter households contacted HOME Line for Tenant Hotline Services. This represents service to approximately 275 residents when all family members have been counted. The cost to serve Edina in 2014 is $4,253. HIGHLIGHTS In 2013, HOME Line helped renters from Edina: • Recover and/or save an estimated $20,309. • Prevent an estimated 6 evictions. • Renters with repair issues who follow our advice are 37% more likely to get their problem fixed than those who don't. • In landlord foreclosure, the average amount of days stayed after the sheriff's sale by renters we have helped is 180 days, and the amount of money saved by renters in landlord foreclosure is $5,935 in 2013. INCOME BREAKDOWN The vast majority (88 %) of these callers are extremely - low, very -low or low- income. These income categories are those used by the U. S. Department of H. U. D.: • Extremely Low: Incomes below 30% of metro median. • Very ow: Incomes between 30% and 50% of metro median a, Low: Incomes between 50% and 80% of metro median. • Moderate: Incomes above 80% of metro median. RACIAL BREAKDOWN 88% Caucasian 8% African American 3% Asian 1% Hispanic Top Ten Reasons For Calls (2013) 1. Repairs 25 2. Security Deposit 20 3. Break Lease 17 4. Eviction 9 5 Neighbors 6 6. Foreclosure 5 7. Notice to Vacate 5 8. Discrimination 5 9. Fees 3 10. Infestation /Bed Bugs 3 Callers' Income 2013 GENDER BREAKDOWN 79% Female 21 % Male Very Low 26% Moderate Proposed CDBG Brooklyn Center CDBG 6,703 Brooklyn Park CDBG 7,063 Hopkins CDBG 1,000 Edina CDBG 3,065 Hennepin County Consolidated Pool CDBG 8,227 Maple Grove CDBG 3,000 New Hope CDBG 4,075 Plymouth CDBG 7,350 Ramsey County CDBG 22,488 Richfield CDBG ....... .. .............. 5,364 Private ....... . ..... __...., ... McKni g ht Foundation 40,000 Otto Bremer Foundation 37,000 Family Housing Fund 25,000 F.R. Bigelow Foundation 17,020 St. Paul Foundation 12,580 Hugh J. Andersen Foundation 6,660 Ramsey County Bar Foundation 2,000 Minnesota State Bar Foundation 1,500 Hennepin County Bar Foundation 1,000 .._.._.. ......: Other Community Shares 2,220 Contributions 3,700 Hotline Training 16,650 Tenant Rights Book 2,220 Interest Income 148 Miscellaneous Income 148 Other (Attorney Fees, etc.) 12,000 Homes within ReachTM `iransforminq lives through home ownership January 22, 2014 Joyce Repya City of Edina Associate Planner 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Joyce; Thank you for the opportunity to submit the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust ( WHAHLT), dba Homes Within Reach (HWR), 2014 Edina CDBG application. The application consists of the fillable form provided by you and three exhibits and a PDF of HWR Annual Report, completed in November 2013. The exhibits include - • Exhibit 1 - HWR Project Description • Exhibit 2 - Community Land Trust and How it Works • Exhibit 3 - Equity Resale Provisions • PDF of HWR Annual Report WHAHLT is seeking financial support from the City of Edina to accompany other matching funding sources to create another affordable home in the community of Edina, using the Community Land Trust practice. This application will enable HWR to continue creating and preserving affordable homeownership in Edina, using the community land trust practice, which allows homeownership to be affordable for low /moderate income work -force families. We appreciate the support the City has provided to those we serve in Edina. We look forward to continuing our partnership in addressing the needs of affordable homeownership housing. Thank you for taking the time to review and consider our proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (952) 401 -7071. Sincerely, _ Janet A. Lindbo Executive Director West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust 5101 Thimsen Avenue, Suite 202, Minnetonka, MN 55345 This description of each activity shall estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities, the specific local objectives and priority needs, and a target date for completion of the activity. Please describe activities thoroughly. Housing Services: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) Is requesting assistance to continue to offer the City of Edina a program that creates and preserves an affordable home using the Community Land Trust practice for low and moderate Income households who provide essential work force services In the City and who otherwise would be unable to buy a home In Edina. Therefore, HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified Income families. The Community Land Trust homes remain affordable between consecutive generations of homeowners. The resale restriction Is the subsidy retention and Is tied to the home not the owner. Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR to purchase the land, stay with the home and Incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale - restricted domain of HWR and will remain affordable for low -to- moderate Income households, through one resale after another. This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low -to- moderate Income families over a long period. In addition, the HWR program meets multiple community needs; they include but are not limited to the following. • Workforce families provide essential services to maintain and sustain the infrastructure of the community. Demand for living in the suburban communities has led to increased home values that have risen to the point that many single - family homes, despite their age, are not affordable to low and moderate income work -force families. Land values In particular have increased, making it difficult for developers to build affordable single - family homes. • The program preserves community resources through the use of existing buildings (preservation and rehabilitation of existing housing stock) and the community's infrastructure. • The program enables newcomers to join the community, revitalize the housing inventory, support the Investment In the delivery of the Community's Infrastructure and maximize the one -time Investment in sustaining affordability. The three principal features of the HWR program continue to appeal to the targeted market, they Include the cost of homes, the quality of the home and their location. In addition, providing a long -term practice for families to become homeowners, stabilizes families and In turn adds value to the community, where they work and or live. Housing Is Identified as a high priority in the Consolidated Plan - Chapter 4 & 5, Existing Housing: rehabilitation and First Time Homeownership. Please see supplemental Information accompanying this form that Includes an Overview of the program, How the CLT Works, Equity Sale Provisions & HWR Annual Report. Please use the below drop down lists to choose the applicable activity and national objective that this project will meet Activity: Homeownership Assistance National Objective: L/M Income Housing If the proposed project Is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority In your community. Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. The Community Land Trust practice used by HWR in creating and sustaining affordable homeowership, offers long -term affordability for the home because it provides multiple families an affordable home in the City of Edina through its resale requirements -typically assisting six to nine families over the course of the 99 year lease. In addition, it brings stability to families and enhances the community and maximizes the one -time investment in sustaining affordability. Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months. Task: Application Process: Application, orientation, homebuyer education, Interview, & approvals Task: Acqulsltlon/Rehab of Property: Property search, selection ,offer - due dlllgences, acqulsltlon /rehab Task: Selling Process for the Home: Mortgage application and approval, selection of home, Committee Interview, finalize Income eligibility, execute PA Task: Closing Process: Home Inspection, Attorney Review, coordination with funders, buyers & closer Project Close: Receive and pay final project expenses, complete final Sources & Uses Statement, submit documentation to funders, receive funding Task: and pay off line of credit Task: Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. Date: Ongoing REQUEST FOR FUNDING - NON PUBLIC SERVICE 6 months Date: URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014 General Information: 60 days Date: 60 days City: Edina Co- Applicant: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust Type of Entity: CHDO Project Name: Homes Within Reach Contact: Janet A. Lindbo Phone: 952 -401 -7071 Activity Data: (per council resolution, If applicable( CDBG FL $ 55,971.00 Resolution: 2014 -22 Is this an existing CDBG - un a prC No A specific property address has not yet been determined. Once funding Is finalized, HWR will search for property to acquire based on purchase price, condition of property, location, matching Project I contributions and applicants' needs. Describe below the activity In detail, Including priority needis) It meets within the 2010.2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click links below. This description of each activity shall estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities, the specific local objectives and priority needs, and a target date for completion of the activity. Please describe activities thoroughly. Housing Services: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) Is requesting assistance to continue to offer the City of Edina a program that creates and preserves an affordable home using the Community Land Trust practice for low and moderate Income households who provide essential work force services In the City and who otherwise would be unable to buy a home In Edina. Therefore, HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified Income families. The Community Land Trust homes remain affordable between consecutive generations of homeowners. The resale restriction Is the subsidy retention and Is tied to the home not the owner. Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR to purchase the land, stay with the home and Incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale - restricted domain of HWR and will remain affordable for low -to- moderate Income households, through one resale after another. This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low -to- moderate Income families over a long period. In addition, the HWR program meets multiple community needs; they include but are not limited to the following. • Workforce families provide essential services to maintain and sustain the infrastructure of the community. Demand for living in the suburban communities has led to increased home values that have risen to the point that many single - family homes, despite their age, are not affordable to low and moderate income work -force families. Land values In particular have increased, making it difficult for developers to build affordable single - family homes. • The program preserves community resources through the use of existing buildings (preservation and rehabilitation of existing housing stock) and the community's infrastructure. • The program enables newcomers to join the community, revitalize the housing inventory, support the Investment In the delivery of the Community's Infrastructure and maximize the one -time Investment in sustaining affordability. The three principal features of the HWR program continue to appeal to the targeted market, they Include the cost of homes, the quality of the home and their location. In addition, providing a long -term practice for families to become homeowners, stabilizes families and In turn adds value to the community, where they work and or live. Housing Is Identified as a high priority in the Consolidated Plan - Chapter 4 & 5, Existing Housing: rehabilitation and First Time Homeownership. Please see supplemental Information accompanying this form that Includes an Overview of the program, How the CLT Works, Equity Sale Provisions & HWR Annual Report. Please use the below drop down lists to choose the applicable activity and national objective that this project will meet Activity: Homeownership Assistance National Objective: L/M Income Housing If the proposed project Is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority In your community. Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. The Community Land Trust practice used by HWR in creating and sustaining affordable homeowership, offers long -term affordability for the home because it provides multiple families an affordable home in the City of Edina through its resale requirements -typically assisting six to nine families over the course of the 99 year lease. In addition, it brings stability to families and enhances the community and maximizes the one -time investment in sustaining affordability. Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months. Task: Application Process: Application, orientation, homebuyer education, Interview, & approvals Task: Acqulsltlon/Rehab of Property: Property search, selection ,offer - due dlllgences, acqulsltlon /rehab Task: Selling Process for the Home: Mortgage application and approval, selection of home, Committee Interview, finalize Income eligibility, execute PA Task: Closing Process: Home Inspection, Attorney Review, coordination with funders, buyers & closer Project Close: Receive and pay final project expenses, complete final Sources & Uses Statement, submit documentation to funders, receive funding Task: and pay off line of credit Task: Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. Date: Ongoing Date: 6 months Date: 3 -6 months Date: 60 days Date: 60 days Date: FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE CDBG $ 55,971.00 Prior Year CDBG Funding- This Project Other federal Funds (specify) $ 55,000.00 Home Partnership Low Income Housing Tax Credits - State (specify) $ 25,000.00 Minnesota Housing Municipal - Metropolitan Council $ 13,000.00 Private (specify) - Program Income Other (specify) 25,000.00 IAHIF Signature: JanetA. U dlW Date: 1/22/2014 Printed Name: Janet A. Lindbo Title: Executive Director Exhibit 1 2014 Edina CDBG Application Exhibit 1: HWR Project Description Response to questions in the CDBG application REOUEST: West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR), a non- profit corporation is seeking a mininum CDBG grant of $55,971 from the City of Edina to assist in creating and preserving an affordable home using the Community Land Trust practice, for a work- force household (50 % -80% of the area median income) in the City of Edina. Mlad. -s 11114001,a The West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) is a Community Land Trust, creating long -term affordable homeownership for workforce families in the western suburban communities in Hennepin County; thereby enhancing community vitality by working in partnership with public agencies and private organizations in addressing the need for affordable homeownership. HWR has served eleven (11) communities in western Hennepin County including the City of Edina. • West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust vision is to transform people's lives through homeownership. • The mission is to use the Community Land Trust practice to provide housing for working families that would be otherwise unable to buy in the West Hennepin suburban communities, offering both communities and homebuyers the ability to sustain permanently affordable homeownership. • The goal is to create and sustain affordable homeownership in the western suburbs of Hennepin County through the implementation of its Homes Within Reach program. • The core values of the program are: o Belief in homeownership Convey stability into people's lives Create and preserve value for families and communities served. The establishment of WHAHLT, later named Homes Within Reach (HWR) was in direct response to the City of Minnetonka's interest in developing a means of increasing the number of permanent affordable homes in Minnetonka and in the western suburban communities of Hennepin County for low to moderate income households. Thus making efficient use of its financial investment and providing a vehicle to meet the communities' housing goals and objectives. Since 2002 HWR has assisted over ,117 families in becoming homeowners, of which eight are families in Edina. CITY OF EDINA: In 2007, Homes Within Reach began its work in Edina, providing affordable homeowership opportunities to two families in the City of Edina. Over the past several years (2007- 2013), Homes Within Reach has created eight affordable homes and in late 2013 purchased the ninth property in Edina. The chart to the right highlights the funds applied to each home in creating and preserving the eight affordable homes in Edina. The average HWR sales price for the Edina homes using HWR Community Land Trust program over the past five years is $139,812; serving families with an Area Median Income (AMI) of 59.8 %. Please see the HWR Profile Chart on this page, which 80% poi 60% - ---- _ ■ City of 50% Edina 40% CDBG 30% Funds 20% 10% ■ HWR 0% _ Matching 1 —' '--- -_ Funds o� \tiro `,r 00 rocs r od` rocs o��, o� oo oti oti `ti tir ,yo ti o0 oti titi ,�� ti ti ,yo oti ti Exhibit 1 2014 Edina CDBG Application provides more detail for the homes acquired and sold in Edina using the Community Land Trust practice HWR PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this request is to once again offer the HWR program in the City of Edina. With land and housing costs exceeding the means of low to moderate workforce households to purchase a home in Edina_ , West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) through its program Homes Within Reach (HWR), creates and preserves affordable homeownership for families- that otherwise would be unable to buy a home in Edina. a Population Served: 0 HWR's target market is households with incomes at 80% or less of Area Median Income (AMI). In practice, HWR has served households between 32% and 79% AMI, the average AMI is 58.1% program wide and 59.8% in Edina. 0 Average Income for leaseholders is $41,729 and the average in Edina is $45,363. a HWR & Edina Profile: How HWR Community Land Trust Works: HWR homes cost less than market rate homes because HWR homebuyers purchase only the house and enter into an agreement with HWR for the use of the land. By taking the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, land trust homes are more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. By eliminating these costs, homes are purchased at approximately 30% - 50% below the typical market value amount in Edina. Therefore, HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Please refer to Exhibt 2 & 3 for further detail on how the Community Land Trust works. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the Ground Lease, even after the resale of the homes. Given that HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and HWR execute a Ground Lease that defines the roles and responsibilities of both HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long -term rights to the land. In addition, they have full use of the land and responsibility for the property. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to WHAHLT or a qualified buyer. The resale price is limited by a formula which more than likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or 2002 -2013 2002 -2013 Categories HWR Edina Comments Totals Totals Total HWR Parcels 109 9 HWR Average Income Served $41,729 $45,363 HWR Area Median Income 58.1% 59.8% Income and family size drives Served % AMI calculation HWR Average Final Monthly $904 $1,021 Includes PITI Mortgage Amount HWR Average Sale Price $125,224 $139,812 HWR Resale 11 0 Household Size 3.86 3.38 HWR Number Persons 452 27 Currently Served HWR Households 106 8 Does not Include resales of 11 Number of Communities 11 1 Served How HWR Community Land Trust Works: HWR homes cost less than market rate homes because HWR homebuyers purchase only the house and enter into an agreement with HWR for the use of the land. By taking the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, land trust homes are more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. By eliminating these costs, homes are purchased at approximately 30% - 50% below the typical market value amount in Edina. Therefore, HWR acquires single - family properties, retains ownership of the land and sells the homes on the land to qualified income families. Please refer to Exhibt 2 & 3 for further detail on how the Community Land Trust works. The homes are made permanently affordable for work -force homeowners through contractual controls embedded in the Ground Lease, even after the resale of the homes. Given that HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and HWR execute a Ground Lease that defines the roles and responsibilities of both HWR and the homeowner. The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long -term rights to the land. In addition, they have full use of the land and responsibility for the property. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to WHAHLT or a qualified buyer. The resale price is limited by a formula which more than likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or Exhibit 1 2014 Edina CDBG Application increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down - payment as well as all principal that has been paid) plus a percentage (35 %) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Thus, subsidies awarded to HWR to purchase the land,. stay with HWR and incorporate perpetual affordability using the community land trust practice. Therefore, the home purchased by HWR applicants using the land trust practice are part of the resale- restricted domain 'of HWR and will remain affordable for low -to- moderate income. households, through one resale after another. The components of permanent housing affordability and subsidy retention create and sustains the affordability of the homes through the HWR program. Therefore, the removal of the market value of the land from the mortgage equation provides initial affordability and permanent affordability is otained through: D A pricing formula that provides the owner with an amount of equity while ensuring that the resale price of the home is affordable and 0 A resale restriction that requires the homeowner to sell the house to another qualified household. Therefore, a one =time investment in the cost of the , land and other related expenses creates a permanently :affordable home and in turn maximizes the effectiveness of the investment" in. affordable housing while providing the benefits of home ownership to households that are otherwise unable to buy a home in Edina. Again, pleasel-efer to Exhibit 2 & 3 for further detail. Method of Approach and Implementation of Schedule: HWR acquires; rehabilitates and then turns around and sells the home to a qualified family using the land trust practice. The following graph highlights the major components of HWR housing production timeline. MONTHS. 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 7 8 1 9 140 " 11 12 creation of one Affordable Home 1. Application Process Informational Meeting A lication Orientation & Homebu er Education Interviews and Income verification Meeting with Lender process -application Pre-approvals '2: Acquisition Property Search Property Selection Purchase Offer of Selected Property Due = Diligence Period & Admin - Determine' Scope of Rehab, LC, Finalize offer, remove contingencies Ac uke ro ert Rehab 3. Selling/Closing Selling/Closing Process Mortgage Ap lication and approval Selection of Property HWR Resident Committee Interview Finalize income eligibility Execute PA home Inspection, attorney review ' Closing - coordination with funders buyers closer Please keep in mind that multiple steps can be completed concurrently or previously - therefore it does not take 12 months to purchase a home, if the applicant is financially ready and there are available homes in their desired community where they work or live The Application Process can take place' at any time, however once a property is located and acquired, many times applicants need to be reapproved for a mortgage, if their pre - approval is more than 60 days old; especially in these times of changing lending requirements. With respect to .the 2014/2015 proposed activity, a specific location in the City of Edina has not yet been predetermined prior to approving this proposed activity. Properties typically are selected and acquired once the funding commitment has been completed, along with matching funds. Properties Exhibit 1 2014 Edina CDBG Application are typically acquired as opportunities arise due to market conditions and the requirements of the HWR acqusition process. Required repair and rehabiliative work are those renovations that will provide the buyers good operating condition of the home and property, promote a safe environment and permit the reuse of structurally sound buildings, many of which were constructed in a manner that is superior to some of today's housing products. COMMUNITY NEED: Housing Affordability by Occupation, Hennepin County $80.000 ^;cedec to $70.000 c, , $60,000 - : dic $50.000 BJxa $40,000 $30.000 Needed to $20,000 rent 1BR $10,000 ® ® °Pont $0 o � Many of the jobs that are available today or are being created do not pay wages that are adequate to afford homeowership for workforce families who provide essential services in the suburban communities of Hennepin County. Please refer to the chart to the left, prepared by Minnesota Housing Partnership, Sources — OES Wage Data by economic development region, MN DEED, Q4 2012; HUD FMR, 2013. E g g o ° o low to land and moderate usin income costs workfor exceeding hous holds to purchase a home, the Community Land Trust, West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) was formed to create and preserve affordable homeownership for families that otherwise would be unable to buy a entry -level home in the City of Edina and other Hennepin County suburban communities, where they work or live and not over burden their income to do so. Homes Within Reach is a creditable program with twelve years of experience providing scattered site affordable homeownership. Offering communities the opportunity to create and preserve affordable homeownership and enhancing community vitality through collaborating with public and private organizations to address the dreams, goals, and objectives of working families to own their home. HWR program meets multiple community needs; they include but are not limited to the following. • Workforce families provide essential services to maintain and sustain the infrastructure of the community. Demand for living in the suburban communities has led to increased home values that have risen to the point that many single - family homes, despite their age, are not affordable to low and moderate income work -force families. Land values in particular have increased, making it difficult for developers to build affordable single - family homes. • The program preserves community resources through the use of existing buildings (preservation and rehabilitation of existing housing stock) and the community's infrastructure. • The program enables new comers to join the community, revitalize the housing inventory, support the investment in the delivery of the Community's infrastructure and maximize the one -time investment in sustaining affordability. Sample of Edina Land Trust Homes 1 NAM Therefore, the benefits and value of the HWR program to the Edina Community are - Exhibit 1 2014 Edina CDBG Application The Expansion of Homeownership Opportunities: The three principal features of the HWR program continue to appeal to the targeted market, they include the cost of homes, the quality of home and their location. In addition, providing a long -term practice for families to become homeowners, stablizies families and in turn adds value to the community, where they work and or live. The HWR program assists in reducing the pressure to build either new housing by preserving existing affordable units or converting existing housing for workforce households. Additionally, owning a CLT home is a starting point on the homeownership ladder for many of HWR homeowners. A 2010 study 1 found that nearly 80% of Land Trust homeowners go on to purchase market -rate homes. Sustains Community Resources- The HWR program makes maximum use of existing buildings and the community's infrastructure. The community's infrastructure is a major selling point to the buyer, and in return, the new family provides value and benefits with respect to the following: • Community's growth, • Delivery of services, • Increasing the labor pool available to local businesses, • Reducing freeway congestion given the opportunity workers can live near their work, • Adding younger, households to the community where the population is often aging and • - Providing the mechanism to invest in affordable housing Supports Residential Stability: HWR program provides assistance to neighborhoods ,in maintaining property as they age. With the aging process taking place there is a need to renew the residential base and support the seniors in moving .from their detached home to a suitable arrangement. In addition, HWR like other CLT organizations support homeowners before and after the purchase of the home. Homeowners are required to attend a homebuyer education class before purchasing their home. Furthermore, HWR continues to support homeowners after they move into their home, especially during times of crisis and change in their lives Preserves Housing Affordability: Community Land Trust homes remain affordable between consecutive generations of homeowners. The resale restriction is the subsidy retention and is tied to the home not the owner. This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low -to- moderate income families over a long period. Studies of land trust ownership have found that the income level served remained about the same from one homeowner to the next. Z This recycling of funds from owner to owner ensures the home remains affordable for low -to- moderate income families over a long period. For example, if homeowners spend 10 -15 years in their home before moving, this would mean 6 to 10 families are served by the CLT during the 99 -year lease, thereby spreading the initial investment by 6 -10 families. Overall, Homes Within Reach is an excellent affordable homeownership program by . enhancing community vitality through collaborating with public and private organizations in transforming lives through homeownership. 'Urban Institute, Shared Equity Homeownership Evaluation: Use Study of Northern Communities Land Trust, April 2010 draft (This evaluation Is part of a larger study still In progress of CLTs, limited equity co- ops and deed restriction programs) ' John Emmenus Davis and Amy Demrowltz (2003) Permanently Affordable Homeownership: Dues the Community Land Trust Deliver on Its Promise? 5 Exhibit 2 2014 Edina CDBG Application Homes Within Reach- Community Land Trust - How it Works West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust dba Homes Within Reach is a Community Land Trust. A Community Land Trust organization is a - o Nonprofit organization • Formed to hold title to land to preserve its long -term affordability • Receives public and private donations of land or monies, to purchase land on which housing exists or can be built • The homes are sold to low -to- moderate income workforce families The CLT retains ownership of the land and provides a long -term ground lease to homebuyers to secure their rights to use the land • The CLT retains a long -term option to re- purchase the homes at a formula- driven purchase price when homeowners later decide to sell & move. Two key components driving the interest in Community Land Trusts are A Social Component: Promoting homeownership for low to moderate income families 0 A Financial Component: Protecting the public's investment in affordable homeownership The Community Land Trust (CLT) is one vehicle that allows homeownership to be affordable for low -to- moderate income workforce families. A Community Land Trust (CLT) establishes affordability by removing the value of the land from the mortgage equation to create initial affordability resulting in savings of principal and interest and in down payment and closing costs. The CLT retains ownership of the land and enters into a 99 -year ground lease with the leaseholder- homeowner. Therefore, each affordable home will offer affordable homeownership to 6 -9. families throughout the life of the lease. The CLT leaseholder- homeowner pays property tax on both the home and the land, and secures the rights to use the land via a Ground Lease. Federal, State, City and private contributions fund project. costs - land acquisition, .buyer assistance, rehab, and holding costs. A CLT ensures permanent affordability of the home through two provisions found in the Ground Lease. 0 The first is a pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity (25 %- 35%), while ensuring the sale price for subsequent low -to- moderate income households is affordable. 0 The second provision requires the homeowner to sell either to another low -to- moderate income household. In addition, the provisions ensure the home continues to be affordable with each sale. A CLT leaseholder- homeowner receives benefits similar to non -CLT homeowners such as the ability to build 'equity, the federal mortgage interest and property tax deduction and the ability to pass on the lease interest and home to their heirs. The following Chart provides an example of how a Community Land Trust creates. initial and permanent affordability (99 years plus). The example compares the difference in affordability after ten years under the CLT and conventional model. Page 1 of 2 Exhibit 2 2014 Edina CDBG Application Affordability Comparison Affordability Comparison CLT Model Conventional Model i Acquisition costs j Market Value Land $ 90,000 $ 90,000 Market Value Home $ 120,000 $ 120,000 i Total $ 210,000 $ 210,000 Subsidy Subsidy /Affordability Gap $ 90,000 $ - Sale Price $ 120,000 $ 210,000 Housing Costs Principal and Interest ' $ 719 $ 1,200 Property Taxes $ 235 $ 235 Homeowner Insurance $ 135 $ 135 Land Lease Fee $ 30 n/a Total Monthly Principal, Interest, Taxes, Insurance $ 1,119 $ 1,570 Down Payment $ 1,000 $ 10,500 Closing Costs $ 4,150 $ 5,650 Market Value After 10 Years Market Value Home $ 161,270 n/a Market Value Land and Home n/a $ 282,222 Increase in Value Z $ 41,270 $ 72,222 Sale Price Calculation after 10 Years Percentage of Appreciation to Owner 35% 100% Owners Share of Appreciation $ 14,445 $ 72,222 New Sale Price of Home $ 134,445 $ 282,222 1 Mortgage Interest Rate 6 %, Term 30 years, 2 Annual average increase in market value 3% The chart above demonstrates that after ten years, the CLT home sells for $134,445 as opposed to $282,222 under the conventional model, a difference of $147,777. There are two primary factors to account for this difference. First, the land has been permanently removed from the speculative market. Secondly, the homeowner receives only a percentage of the appreciation of the home when they decide to sell. In the above example, the owner receives 35% or $14,445, based on a formula that is standard among CI-Ts (25 -35 %) across the United States, where the homeowner receives only a portion of the appreciation in order to make the home affordable for each subsequent sale. Page 2 of 2 Exhibit 3 2014 Edina CDBG Application Equity Resale Provisions The home purchased by HWR applicants in Edina using the land trust practice will be part of the resale- restricted �v Homes domain of WHAHLT - HWR and will remain affordable for low- moderate income households, through one resale after within another, and continue to serve homebuyers without the Reach- need of additional subsidies, regardless the number of times the home sells (99 -198 years). The Ground lease (executed between WHAHLT =HWR and the homeowner) protects the assets of the land by providing the land trust certain rights to safeguard the condition and affordability of the home. HWR homes cost less than market rate-homes because HWR homebuyers purchase only the house and enter into an agreement with WHAHLT- HWR for the use of the land. By taking the cost of the land out of the real estate transaction, land trust homes are more affordable than houses on the open real estate market. Given that WHAHLT -HWR owns the land and the homeowner owns the home, the homeowner and WHAHLT -HWR sign a long -term legal document called a Ground Lease, which defines the roles and responsibilities of both WHAHLT -HWR and the homeowner.- -The Ground Lease allows the homeowner to secure, long -term rights to . the land. The homeowner is responsible for the payment of all real estate taxes on the house and on the land. The homeowner may sell his /her home only to a qualified buyer or WHAHLT -HWR. The resale price is limited by a formula which more then likely (based on market conditions) allows the seller to recover the original cost of the house plus a modest profit. Therefore, assuming the house has retained or. increased in value, the homeowner who sells his or her home will get all of their equity (the amount of money that they used as a down payment as well as the entire principal paid to that point in time). In addition, to a percentage (35% for WHAHLT) of the home's appreciation (the amount that a home has increased in value since it was purchased). Please see the attached - How the Community Land Trust Model Works - Exhibit 2. Homes Annual Report RdachTM Transforming lives through homeownership Charting a legacy of partnership, innovation & growth. We are committed to the business axiom that "what gets measured gets improved" To that end, see below for a summary of our annual and related achievements. This progress is due to the commitment of our homeowners, f unders, community partners and board of directors. Increased Housing Production Updated Strategic Planning Expanded Collaboration ✓ Acquired 9 properties in 2012. u° ✓ Created 9 new homes in 2012. m ✓ Resold 4 homes in zoiz. ✓ Acquired 6 additional properties in early 2oi3. ✓ Total of io6 properties and 113 families since 2001. m ieOe'Fad°ys' V ✓ Completed s -year strategic plan. ✓ Defined 4 key strategic objectives: i. Continue providing effective programs that sustain and grow HWR. z. Remain financially efficient, stable and transparent. 3. Strengthen community partnerships via HWR programs. 4. Positively influence public policy to ensure effective operations. ✓ Continued to expand our network of communities, partners and services. ✓ Working with City of Lakes Community Land Trust on proposed strategic collaboration. Our Mission The HWR mission is to create and preserve affordable home ownership in western suburban Hennepin County by using the Community Land Trust practice to help qualified families purchase the house and lease the land at a nominal fee. ■ wok. . S.N N- omw.°n From the President 2012 was a year of significant progress. We had the privilege of serving thirteen new families with affordable housing options, raising the total of families °t served to io6 from 2001 through 2012. % As a result, both our homeowners and communities have benefited from HWR's community land trust program. This Robert Hamilton unique business model creates and wHAHLr President sustains homes in neighborhoods near where families work and serve, which helps protect and enhance community wealth and stability. we have expanded the number of families and communities we serve, and completed our five -year strategic plan. Thanks to the expertise and diligence of our board and staff, it's also been a productive year with respect to planning. We formally established a long range vision to guide HWR's growth over the next five years, with our focus on: • Expanding the number of communities we serve. • Creating and sustaining a strong mix of both public and private hnancing and partnership. • Collaborating with the City of Lakes Community land Trust to create a shared business and service model that can increase homeownership equity for underserved families across Hennepin County. The joy for all of us who are passionate about HWR comes from serving our families and the appreciation they express. The Why They Serve article about HWR homeowner and volunteer Jennifer Smith is a prime example of why supporting the HWR mission Is a personal commitment for all of us. Join us for a grand evening at our May 17 fundraiser. silent and live auction Item grounds and gardens. Looking into 2014, our second annual f undraiser will be held on May 17th at the Minnesota Arboretum in Chanhassen. This popular event will feature s, and fun tram -ride tours of the As always, we are deeply thankful for your support over the last year. Support the HWR mission with an early contribution via the donation link on our website. 66 Why They Serve It's no secret that our ability to support our homeowners and communities is tied directly to the contributions of our volunteers. As both an HWR homeowner and member of two committees, Jennifer Smith exemplifies the ongoing commitment that all of our volunteers make to our mission. Jennifer Smith, HWR homeowner and member I discovered HWR several years ago after a divorce and health challenge compelled me to start looking for a home forme and my two boys. I had no real options until a friend told me about HWR, so 1 did my homework and realized their program could work for us. A few months after my first meeting with the staff, we moved into a greatMinnetonka neighborhood, and it's been home ever since. HWR opened a second and equally important door for us as well. Moving to the Minnetonka house meant my youngest son had to switch schools. His new teachers discovered that he Is a gifted student, and he's now on an accelerated leaming program that is helping him reach his full potential. I serve on the fund development HWR opened doors to committee because diversifying our funding sources is essential to our new home and the future of HWR. I also devote a new life for my son. time to the homeowner's committee because I know how nervous 1 was during my application process, and so I can help prospective homeowners relax and understand how to keep working toward owning their own home. Volunteering Is my way of giving back to this exceptional organization and its great people. � g New Look Online Our updated website has a refined design, easy navigation and enhanced ability to communicate with our homeowners and partners. -- -a QI Reazh .r.vavu. � ..nrnew+.. lM. h+1N4.b �alml ®bb.^M�.Nen.w.K des• ED Lin-* � www.HomesWithinReach.org 2012 Board of Directors Ameena Elshershaby Robert Hamilton Gene Haugland Christine Johnson Patti Marrinan Jerry Nystuen Joel Papa Terry Schneider Brian Sullivan Chris Trailer Winnie White- Scherber Margaret Willie III Lr I "I don't know how we'd have done this without you." — HWR homeowner 2012 Financials Statement of Activities 8 Changes In Net Assets Support IL Revenue 2012 2011 Grants, Contributions 8 Other Revenue $ 1,271,341 $ 1,053,486 Ground tease Fees 32,123 29,006 Property Sales 1,074,400 1,069,000 Interest 239 605 Total Support 6 Revenue $ 2,378,103 $ 2,152,097 Expenses 86,700 3,795 Property Costs 1,215,816 1,144,297 Operations 206,347 193.168 Total Expenses 1,422,163 1,337,465 Increase In Net Assets $ 955.940 $ 814,632 Statement of Financial Position as of December 31, 2012 Assets 2012 2011 Cash $ 274,999 $ 270,630 Accounts Receivable 1,895 2,460 Prepaid Expense 3,037 3,876 Properties to be Sold 607,425 571,852 Equipment, Net of Depreciation 1,730 2,808 Grant Receivable 86,700 3,795 Land In Trust 8,360,850 7,445,850 Total Assets $ , 9.336,s3s $ 8.301.271 Liabilities 8 Net Assets Accrued Expenses $ 67,789 $ 150,173 Loans 863.376 701,567 Total Liabilities 931,165 851,740 Net Assets 8,405,471 7.449.531 Total Liabilities & Net Assets $ 9,336,636 $ 6.301,271 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2012 HWR Support & Revenues 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ❑ Property Sales ■ Gov't Grants 13 Other ❑ Donated Land -in kind Thanks to our program f unders and contributors. Program Funders • B.C. Gamble and P.W. Skogmo Fund /Minneapolis Foundation • Bremer Bank • City of Brooklyn Park • City of Eden Prairie • City of Edina • City of Golden Valley • City of Maple Grove • City of Minnetonka • City of New Hope • City of Richfield • City of St. Louis Park • City of Wayzata • Deephaven Cove LLC/Steven Scott Development • Fannie Mae Minnesota Partnership Office fice • Family Housing Fund • Greater Twin Cities United Way • Halley's Custom Homes • Hennepin County • HOME Partnership • Homes for All • Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners • Local Initiatives Support Corporation /McKnight Foundation • Metropolitan Council • Minnetonka United Methodist Church • Minnesota Housing Finance Agency • Otto Bremer Foundation • Ryland Homes • St. Luke Presbyterian Church • St. Joseph the Worker Church • United Way • Thrivent Financial for Lutherans • Wells Fargo Bank • ZB Companies Homes Reach- Transforming lives through homeownership 952 -4011- 7071.952 -224 -2857 (fax) tvww.homeswithinreach.org • info ®homeswithinreach.org 5101 Thimsen Avenue, Suite 202 • Minnetonka, MN 55345 Contributors - INDIVIDUALS Allen, Mr. & Mrs. J Anderson, Karen Anderson, Kris Bergquist, Elaine Callison, Jan Carlson, JoAnna Elkin, Kelly Elshershaby, Tarek & Ameena Erickson, Bill Ferrekkm, Brian Fryhling, Pamela Gabler, William Gelwitz, Alan R. Gruis, Doris Hamilton, Robert Hammel, Bette Hardy, John Hartwell, David 8 Elizabeth Haugh, Robert & Mary Haugland, Gene Hoel, Dr. Roger 8 Donna Hokenson, Louise & Edward Jacques, Louis F. Johnson, Gwen Jordano, Barbara Keller, Stephen & Robin Levine, Ruth Lang, Gregory Lenz, Mark Lienemann, Pamela Lindbo, John & Janet Marrinan, Tim & Patti Mattson, James McNamara, Doug Michaels, Lorraine Monskey, Lee Mrachek, Len Nystuen, Gerald O'Brien, Stephen 011ila, Erik Pagnucco, John Papa, Joel Perry, Ann Radermacher, Lee Rosenbaum, Harry Rosenbaum, Sue Schaschl, Sharon Schneider, Terry Siskin, Michael & Vicki Stoakes, Loren & Lavonn Sullivan, Brian Theis, Kevin Trailer, Chris & Angela Wangen, R. K. Warren, Jane Willie, Margaret White - Scherber, Winnie ORGANIZATIONS Barnes & Nobel Best Buy Blue Plate Convention Grill Cooks of Crous Hill Crave Restaurant D'Amlco & Sons Dundee Nursery Edina Country Club Edina Grill Edina Landscaping Energy Saver Garden by Den Garden Gate Haskell's Heartland Payment Systems Joseph A. Bank Lorie Line Music, Inc. Mahoney, Ulbrich, Christiansen, Russ, P.A. McCormick's & Schmick's Minnesota Twins Nordic Walking Omni Floors Oreck Clean Home Center - Edina Original Pancake House Parasole Restaurants Premier Fencing Private Design Decorating Q Cumbers Quantum Restoration R.F. Moeller Jeweler Salut Bar & Grill Schmitt Music Skunkmaker, LLC Sunnyside Gardens Tavern on France TCF Foundation The Brass Handle TLC Toys Twin Cities Closets UPS Store 1779 Warner's Stellian Westin Edina Galleria Hotel William Henney-Attomey at Law William Soules - Attorney at Law Williams Sonoma Us REQUEST FOR FUNDING - NON PUBLIC SERVICE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014 General Information: City: Edina Co- Applicant: Type of Entity: local Government Project Name: Rehabilitation of Private Property Contact: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Phone: 952- 826 -0462 Activity Data: Iper mundl resolution, it applicable) CDBG Fui $ 50,000.00 Resolution: 2014 -22 Is this an existing CDBG - funde pro Yes Project L- City wide Describe below the activity In deta0, Including priority need(s) It meets within the 2010.2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click links below. Citywide Housing Rehabilitation Program: The City of Edina will provide deferred loans of up to $30,000 per unit to low -or moderate - Income owner occupants who are elderly (62 +), disabled, single -heads of households, or families for rehabilitation of substandard single - family structures. Applications are accepted throughout the year on a "first -come, first served" basis. The loans are non - amortizing and must be repaid only if the property is sold or transferred within 15 years. The income limits for a low- or moderate - income household for all of our housing programs are in direct alignment with the HUD 2014 income limit guidelines for the state of Minnesota; Minneapolis -St. Paul - Bloomington metropolitan and surrounding area. It is anticipated the loans will serve 3 or more families and be completed by July 1, 2015. Housing rehabilitation for households at or below 50% of AMI is considered a high county priority in the Consolidated Plan and local priority for the City of Edina. This program is administered by the Hennepin County Housing, Community Works and Transportation office. Please use the below drop down Usts to choose the applicable activity and national objective that this project will meet Activity: Rehabilitation National Objective: L/M Income Area Benefit If the proposed project B a low urban county priority, you must explain below why it has a higher priority In your community. Please describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. The city anticipates providing housing rehabilitation assistance for three to as many as eight Income /asset eligible Edina homeowners of single dwelling unit properties. The funds will assist them in making structural improvements to their homes. Number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built: I nr mnrP Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months. Task: Rehabilitation of 3 or more private properties for income /asset eligible homeowners Date: 7/14-7/15 Task: Task: Task: Task: Task: Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate. Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: FUNDING SOURCES - -_ -_ AMOUNT - _ _ _ SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE CDBG $ 50,000.00 Prior Year CDBG Funding - This Project 50,000.00 Other Federal Funds (specify) - tow Income Housing Tax Credits - State (specify) - Municipal - Metropolitan Council _ Private (specify) - Program Income Other(specify) Project Total, $ 100,000.00 Signature: Joyce Repya Date: 2/18/2014 Printed Name: Joyce Repya Title: Senior Planner an To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: February 18 2014 o /nel Agenda Item #: VI. B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements No. P -23 Resolution No. 2014 -18 Action Requested: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible; Council is requested to adopt Resolution 2014 -18 accepting the feasibility study, approving Improvement No. P -23, authorizing plans and specifications to be prepared and authorizing bids taken. O "`�/ Information / Background: For several years, the City has discussed different ways to improve public parking conditions at 50th and France. For the last six months, City staff and Kimley -Horn Associates worked closely with the local business community and other stakeholders to identify a cost - effective scope of work that could achieve the collective goals. This effort culminated in the January 21, 2014 Feasibility Study for Improvements No. P -23. Throughout the evaluation period, great attention was given to include the perspectives of property owners,., business operators, employees, customers and other community stakeholders. A volunteer Project Advisory Team met to discuss goals and a variety of alternatives, a public open house was held and 9 focus group sessions were convened. Additionally, a survey of business concerns and a customer survey were also conducted. The project scope and scheduling was determined based on this information. The proposed work is described in the attached presentation and includes necessary repairs and maintenance as well as capital improvements to enhance the function and use of the three existing parking ramps. Expansion of a parking ramp is not proposed at this time The total proposed budget is $5,685,000. Repair and maintenance items are estimated to cost $3,310,000 while the estimate for capital improvements is $2,375,000. The Feasibility Study contemplates that the repair and maintenance costs, as well as future annual. maintenance and operational costs will be borne by the property owners and funded through the special assessment process. The Feasibility Study also presumes that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority will fund the capital improvements to the City-owned rmmnc City of Edina •'4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix E of the Feasibility Study. The methodology for distributing special assessments dates to 1974. Based on the number of changes that have occurred in the last 40 years, it is time to update this policy. The updated preliminary assessment roll is based not on square foot of the property but on the parking demand of each parcel, as determined by the Edina Zoning Code. This approach assesses a greater amount to parcels that generate higher demand, like restaurants and theaters while parcels that provide some of their own parking on -site are assessed a lower amount. The new approach and updated preliminary assessment roll is attached. The major improvements intended for 2014 and 2015 are anticipated to be assessed to the properties upon completion .of the work in fall 2015. For 2014, the only assessed costs will be the regular maintenance and operation costs that are traditionally assessed in the Fall. Assessment Hearings will be conducted prior to the assessments. The Feasibility Study was also informed by a Project Management Team that included representatives from several City Departments: Engineering, Public Works, Planning and Administration. Staff has reviewed the Feasibility Study and feels that the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective and feasible. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -18 Summary of Improvement P -23 (6-pages) Special assessment methodology (I -page) Preliminary Assessment Roll '(I -page) Certificate of Mailing Notice (3- pages) RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -18 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23, 50TH AND FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution the City Council adopted the 21st day of January 2014 fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. P -23, the proposed improvements to the public parking ramps and wayfinding system at 50th and France;�and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the improvement hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 18th day of February, 2014, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the cost responsibility for these improvements is to be shared by the impacted properties and the City whereby the property owners will be responsible for maintenance and operating costs while the City is responsible for costs of capital improvements; and WHEREAS, assessment hearings will be conducted in the future to identify the actual cost of each impacted property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT •RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: I.- Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to improve the public parking and wayfinding systems. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The Public Works Director is hereby designated with the responsibility for this improvement and shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared to complete such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvements from the proceeds of tax- exempt bonds. Dated: February 18, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HE.NNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20. City Clerk 2/12/2014 Agenda i ■ Public Involvement ■ Proposed Improvements ■ Financing ■ Proposed Parking Policy Changes ■ Schedule n3 ■ Future Projects Public Involvement ■ Project Management Team - 7 Meetings ■ Project Advisory Team - 7 Meetings ■ Open House - September 18 - ■ Focus Group Meetings - 9 Meetings in Oct. 1� • Business /Property Owner Survey- Oct. • Customer Survey - Dec. Proposed Improvements Repairs and Capital Improvements $ 650,000 Increase Lighting Brightness $ 100,000 Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access $1,100,000 Elevator in South Ramp 11 i n3 $ 350,000 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System — $1,375,000 Paint Ramp Interiors and South Ramp Exterior $ 60,000 Screen Garbage Areas $ 25,000 Replace Dead / Dying Trees a3 $ 500,000 Replace Broken Pavers $ 175,000 Automatic Irrigation System _ $ 50,000 Repair Planter Beds $1,300,000 Ramp Repairs and Maintenance $5,685,000 TOTAL REPAIR AND CAPITAL COST 2/12/2014 VA Proposed Improvements Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs $ 250,000 Current Annual Assessment $ 35,000 Holiday Season Parking Strategies $ 10,000 South Ramp Elevator Maintenance $ 10,000 Parking Wayfinding System Maintenance $ 30,000 Annual Ramp Power Washing $ 10,000 Improve Sanitation $ 5,000 Automatic Irrigation System Maintenance $ 100,000 Escrow for Future Periodic Preventative Maint $ 450,000 ANNUAL O&M COSTS Financing Sources of Funds Repairs and Capital Improvements $3,310,000 Assessments $2,375,000 Other City Funds $5,685,000 Repairs and Capital Improvements Annual Maintenance Improvements E- $ 350,000 Assessments $ 100,000 Parkina Permit Revenues $ 450,000 Annual Maintenance Improvements /1 11 d� a3 I\ 11 x �a3 H� R$ 2/12/2014 3 2/12/2014 4 Financing Assumptions Sources Capital Costs Paid By City ■ Periodic Repairs Paid By Parking Permit Fees ■ Maintenance Costs Paid by Assessments be as great as 750 stalls, but only 430 permit " Assessment Assumptions a3 $3,310,000 Total Capital Cost o ' ., ■ 20 Year Term �3 � f hf' ■ Assessment Based On Individual Property Parkind Demand 2/12/2014 4 Proposed Parking Policy Changes 501 & France District Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor employee parking demand. o Peak employee parking demand is estimated to be as great as 750 stalls, but only 430 permit " parking spaces are currently provided. o Consider making the top two levels of the Middle 11 Ramp and lowest level of the North Ramp "5 -Hour �3 and Employee" parking.? ■ Increase employee annual fee from permit parking $60 to at least $120. Tiered employee parking permit structure is being contemplated. f o Changes will go into effect in April 2014. ■ Customer parking will remain free. 2/12/2014 4 Schedule I Final Design / Public Involvement Feb -May, 2014 Bid Opening May 22, 2014 w Award Contract June 3, 2014 Edina Art Fair June 6 -8, 2014 Start 2014 Construction June 16, 2014 I, I nterim Construction Completion October 2014 2014 Holiday Shopping Season Nov -Dec, 2014 Start 2015 Construction March 2015 a3 E' Edina Art Fair June 2015$ Construction Complete October 2015' Finalize Assessments Fall 2015 Construction will be phased to reduce impacts to businesses during construction. Future Projects '�- These projects are recommended but not feasible at this time: 9 ■ Parking Ramp Expansion (140- 200 Stalls) ■ Middle Ramp Elevator 11 A 2/12/2014 5 2/12/2014 Questions? dam 4 11 � T a3 e �. CITY OF EDINA =, 50t'' and France. Commercial Area Special Assessment Policy Background The Edina City Code (Chapter 23, Article V) addresses the City's and property owner's responsibility related to the public parking facilities and other public infrastructure at the 50th and France Commercial Area. Section 26 -167 states in part that all costs for work incurred shall be charged to each owner of each parcel of land "in proportion to the benefits conferred upon the lot or parcel." i The original concept for assessing the maintenance and operational costs for the public parking facilities dates back to 1974. The original methodology was based on the floor area of each building (as built.in 1974) plus an adjustment for buildings that were deemed to have expansion potential at that time.,ln 1978, the methodology was amended to clarify that properties that were not deemed to have expansion potential must still make a contribution to the costs of public improvements. The details of the original.methodology are not readily understandable with four decades of changes. Poised with a significant reinvestment, it is desirable to update the special assessment policy. Purpose An updated special assessment policy will more accurately distribute the cost of shared improvements in a transparent, fair and equitable manner. Methodology After investigating several options, the following method will be used to distribute shared costs of the commercial area among the benefiting properties.. Each commercially- zoned,parcel will be assessed for its portion of costs related to the maintenance and operation of public parking facilities and related rights -of -way. The method of distributing the costs shall be as follows: 1) The usable.area of each building located on each improved parcel shall be identified. a. Gross building area (GBA) shall be determined using information from the Edina Assessing Department. The use of each portion of the building shall be determined using. information from the Edina Assessing, Fire or Building Departments. b. Residential units with dedicated parking are excluded 2) The parking required of each building shall be calculated using the Edina Zoning Code based on the use(s) in the building. The provisions for a shopping center with shared parking shall be applied. 3) The available on -site parking spaces (if any) shall be identified and deducted from the required parking to determine the unmet parking'need of each building. 4) The unmet parking need of each building shall lie compared to the total unmet parking in the commercial area to determine the proportion of special assessments attributable to each building. This method shall be applied each time that public improvements are undertaken and assessed to the properties in the 50th and France Commercial Area. Adopted by City Council (February 18, 2014) R A F T Page 11 A B C D E F G H I 1 K L 1 1 18 -028 -24 -14 -0016 Walgreens Drug William C Knapp 11,138 1 8,018 6,480 0 3,120 40 1 15 25 1.25% 2 18 -028 -24 -14 -0024 BeSpoke Salon & former Thrivent 49.5 LLC 5,441 5,692 5,441 27,437 0 0 27 7 20 1.00% 3 18-028 - 24- 14-0035 former Hooten Cleaners Soon Yong Park/ Jung Ja Park 5,061 5,061 44,420 0 0 25 13 12 0.60% 4 18- 028 -24 -14 -0108 U.S. Post Office LB 49th 1/2 Street LLC 7,682 6,026 0 0 1,656 30 25 5 0.25% 5 18- 028 - 24-14 -0132 Spalon Montage- main Frank Holdings LLC 11,493 9,755 1,738 0 0 57 0 57 2.84% 5 18 -028 -24 -14 -0133 Spalon - former house Frank Holdings LLC 2,304 2,304 0 0 11 0 11 0.55% 5 18 -028 -24 -14 -0132 TBD Fashion Avenue Frank Holdings LLC 4,880 3,796 3,294 1,586 0 0 24 0 24 1.20% 6 18 -028- 24- 14-0118 Gretchen House OMG Properties LLC 4,567 3,395 3,942 0 1,172 17 0 17 0.85% 7 18 -028- 24 -14 -0020 dp Hue, France Avenue Partnership 6,519 0 3,668 10,975 0 2,851 18 0 18 0.90% 8 18- 028 - 24-14 -0021 Beaujos, Papersource France Avenue Partnership 11,394 1,302 3,474 2,379 0 4,239 39 0 39 1.95% 9 18- 028 -24 -14 -0022 Mozza mia / Hot Mama Edina Properties Inc. 31,471 9,446 19,101 0 2,924 159 0 159 7.93% 10 18-028- 24 -14 -0122 Al Johnson Clothing, etal Property Administration Co 14,070 7,436 5,901 4,844 0 3,325 54 0 54 2.69% 11 18 -028- 24-14 -0121 AT Home Designs / Prahna JSG Company LLP 12,960 6,480 6,480 0 0 65 0 65 3.24% 12 18 -028- 24- 14-0126 Edina 5-0 Mall L A Real Estate Group, Et Al 80,265 5,692 32,045 27,437 0 15,091 339 0 339 16.91% 13 18- 028 -24 -14 -0046 US Bank First Building Corporation 44,420 44,420 1 0 0 1 222 116 1 106 5.29% IS I 15- UZ1S- Z4- 14 -UU44 US tianK parting First BUlltlmg Corporation D 1 0 1 0 D 1 0 0 0 0.00% 13 18 -028- 24-14 -0045 US Bank drive thru First Building Corporation 3,352 1,676 0 1,676 8 0 8 0.40% 13 18- 028 -24 -14 -0047 US Bank parking First Building Corporation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 13 18- 028. 24-14 -0109 US Bank parking First Building Corporation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 14 18-028 - 24-01 -0178 Lund's Foods Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 32,204 32,204 0 0 161 69 92 4.59% 14 18 -028 -24-41 -0175 Lund's Foods Parking Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15 18-028 -24-41 -0182 SDth and France Office Building A K Larson Family LLC 39,685 3,796 7,551 16,676 0 11,662 155 0 155 7.73% 16 18- 028 -24411 -0050 3925 Building Edina Properties Inc. 11,826 3,942 3,942 1 0 3,942 1 39 0 39 1.95% 16 18-028 -24-41 -0049 3925 Building Edina Properties Inc. 24,730 10,702 10,975 0 3,053 108 0 108 5.39% 17 18- 028 - 24-41 -0052 Edina Theater JSG Company LLP 32,424 28,345 2,136 0 1,943 282 0 282 14.06% 18 18- 028 -24-41 -0383 RF Moeller, Edina B fill, TCF Bank, Cos 5000 France Company 22,233 4,383 17,850 0 124 0 124 6.18% 19 18- 028 -24-41 -0055 Salut Bistro / Oliver & Taylor France at 50th LLC 16,368 7,436 748 8,184 0 0 102 0 102 5.09% 20 18 -028 -24-01 -0066 Cocina Del Barrio 5036 France Property LLC 7,407 4,847 2,560 0 0 56 0 56 2.79% 21 18- 028 - 24-41 -0237 BMO Harris Americana Bank of Edina 19,102 19,102 0 0 96 29 67 3.34% 22 18- 028 -24-41 -0181 Edina Liquor City of Edina 8,572 4,286 0 4,286 21 D 1 21 1.05% 18 -028 -24-14 -0026 former Edina Realty City of Edina 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00% 471,568 65,247 193,382 151,999 0 60,940 100.00% N O 50 /France P -23 - preliminary special assessment roll February 12, 2014 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date. February 5, 2014, acting''on behalf of said City, -_I deposited in the United. States mail copies 'of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for 50th & France Parking And Wayfnding, Improvement No. P -23 (Exhibit 'A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County' Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their"respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that.l also sent said notice to the-following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property .is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of .said County,Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of ,r 1 Edina City Clerk February 5, 2014 Notice of Public Hearing 50' & France Parking And Wayfinding Improvement No. P -23 The Edina .City Council will conduct a public hearing at Edina City Hall on Tuesday, February 18, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. to consider parking and wayfinding improvements in the 50`h & France Business District This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2014 and spring 2015 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall'of 2015. The estimated project cost is $5;685,000. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is anticipated to contribute $2,375,060 towards the proposed capital improvements. The cost of maintenance and repairs ($3,310,000) is proposed to be funded by special assessment distributed among the benefiting parcels. If the total estimated cost were to be assessed, the rate would be $12.06 per square foot. Considering the potential contribution'from the. Edina HRA, the estimated assessable cost would be reduced to $7.02 per square foot. The special assessment can be divided over a twenty -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. Please note that the Parking and Wayfinding Improvements No. P -23 is in addition to the annual maintenance and operations assessment The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes a total of 471,568 square feet of gross building area located at the following addresses: 3x909, 3918, 3944, and 3948 West 49`h Y2 Street; 3902, 3906, 3907, 3911, 3917 -3925, 3930, 3939, 3943, 3945, and 4100 West 50' Street; 4916, 4924, 4930, 4936, 4948, 5034, 5036, and 5050 France Avenue South. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Read the feasibility study online at http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section =50th- France - Parking. This public hearing is your last opportunity to comment on the project You may: *Write to City of Edina, Attention Bill Neuendorf, 4801 W. 50' Street, Edina, MN 55424 -Email to mail EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Bill Neuendorf •Attend the public hearing and offer comments. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov. 952- 826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 Easy Peel ®Labels i Use Avery® Template 5160® 1 ♦ Bend line to i Feed Paper expose Pop -9up EdgeT"" i S i; AVERY® S96()TM , 1802824140016 1802824140024 1802824140035 William C Knapp 49.5 LLC Soon Yong Park & Jung Ja Park Attn: Accounting C/O John D Gross 5275 Grandview Square Suite 3308 5000 Westown Parkway Suite 400 4520 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 West Des Moines, IA 50266 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140108 1802824140132 1802824140133 LB 49th 1/2 Street LLC Frank Holdings LLC Frank Holdings LLC Attn: Jennfier Kent 5223 Edina Industrial Boulevard 5223 Edina Industrial Boulevard 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55439 Edina, MN.55441 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140118 OMG Properties LLC 4930 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55410 1802824140022 Edina Properties Inc. 4100 50th Street W. Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140126 L A Real Estate Group, Et Al 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410182_ A K Larson Family LLC 3939 50th Street W, Suite 200 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410052 JSG Company LLP 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1802824410066 5036 France Property LLC 5036 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55410 1802824140020 1802824140021 France Avenue Partnership France Avenue Partnership C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. 810012th Avenue S, Suite 200 8100 12th Avenue S, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55425 Bloomington, MN 55425 1802824140122 Property Administration Co 3922 50th Street W Edina, MN 55424 1802824140046 First Building Corporation C/O US Bank N.A. 2800 E Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55406 1802824410049 Edina Properties Inc. 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410383 5000 France Company 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1802824410237 Americana Bank of Edina Excel Bank of Edina P.O. Box 1509 Minneapolis, MN 55480 1802824140121 1SG Company'LLP 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1802824410178 Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410050 Edina Properties Inc. 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55425 1802824410055 France at 50th LLC 7800 Metro Parkway, Suite 300 Bloomington, MN 55425 1802824410181 City of Edina Edina Liquor 480150th Street W Edina, MN 55424 ttiquettes faciles a peler ; ♦ Repliez 6 l hachure afln de ; www.avery.com ; t tt:c-- ,,. ,.4t,-14 nuetav® aicn® SeDS de Mudilar In rahnrd Pnn unTm ! 1 -60OZO -AVERY ry � ` ro; To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager o Ce: C UJ '0 Agenda Item #: VI. C. Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Public Hearing — Modifying Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, Establishing Pentagon Park. Tax. Increment Financing District and Adopting Tax Increment Financing Plan; Resolution No. 2014 -23 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -23 Information / Background: The Pentagon Park office park, consisting of fifteen multi - tenant office buildings, was built in the late 1960s. For several decades, it was well positioned in the market place and had much success. In the past decade however, its dated layout and aging infrastructure has made it considerable less desirable. During the January 8, 2013 work session, the Pentagon Park area was one of several identified as potential locations where a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District maybe warranted. Since 2004, the assessed valuation of the Pentagon Park properties has declined by 60 %. The vacancy rate of some of the buildings far exceeds that of the marketplace. Nearly every building requires significant repair after several years of deferred maintenance. The area is in need of redevelopment so that this downward trend is reversed. The City retained Ehlers & Associates as well as other professionals to inspect the existing buildings and prepare the TIF Plan and necessary modifications to the Redevelopment Project Area. LHB, Inc. inspected each building in recent months and determined that the proposed District satisfies the requirements for creation of a 26 -year TIF Redevelopment District. The report is attached for your consideration. The proposed plan has been circulated to other agencies for their review and comment as required by State law. The new owner envisions a complete transformation of the private properties in the future. While no specific design has been decided upon at this time, the future land use will include a mixture of uses and will likely require significant improvements in the public infrastructure. The establishment of a new Tax Increment Financing District would allow the City to consider a public/private partnership in the future so that the full potential of this important business /mixed use district can be realized. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -23 (6- pages), TIF Summary (4- pages), and Modification to Redevelopment Plan and TIF Plan for the Pentagon Park TIF District (140- pages) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 This Page Purposely. Left Blan,k. a This Page Purposely. Left Blan,k. 1. Council member adoption: CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA introduced the following resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -23 ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT THEREIN AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council ") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals 1.01•. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") has heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and adopted the Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that the City adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification ") and establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (the "District ") therein and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan ") therefor (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Modification and Plan "); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act ") all as reflected in the Modification and Plan, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Modification and Plan and have caused the Modification and Plan to be prepared. 1.03. The HRA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Modification and Plan, including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of and written comment on the Modification and Plan by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Modification and Plan by the HRA on February 18, 2014, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04.. Certain written reports (the "Reports ") relating to the Modification and Plan and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the Council and /or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Modification and Plan. The Reports, including the redevelopment qualifications reports and planning documents, include data, information and /or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts.the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully.a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. 1.05 The City is not modifying the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, but is however, modifying the RedevelopmentTlan therefor. Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification. 2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds that: (a) the land within the project area would not be available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section 3. 'Findings for the Establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 3.01. .. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act. 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan, that the Modification and Plan conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Modification and Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the District by private enterprise. 3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings, stated in this Section and has.set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.04. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the District. Section 4. Public Purpose 4.01. The adoption of the Modification and Plan conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do not outweigh the primary public benefits. Section S. Approval and Adoption of the Modification and Plan 5.01. The Modification and Plan, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the Executive Director. 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Modification and Plan and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the District, as described in the Modification and Plan, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Modification and Plan with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Dated: February 18, 2014 James Hovland, Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Debra Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)' SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, .the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 City Clerk EXHIBIT A The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (District), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: Finding that the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of 16 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for commercial /industrial purposes. At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan.) 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing' would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private,investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding' is'supported by the fact that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. Specifically, the redevelopment will result in job, creation opportunities, enhanced public improvements, better management of storm water, and increased green space on the privately owned parcels. The developer has demonstrated that the costs of .soils corrections, structured parking, demolition, and street/sidewalk improvements make this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer has already applied for and been granted and will continue to apply for State and Metropolitan Council funding for redevelopment costs. The developer was asked for and''provided a proforma as justification that the development would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. (See attachment in Appendix G of the TIF Plan.) The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: The property has operated for the last several years as a lower rent office development. The current owner of the site has demonstrated that small amounts of private investment would make the existing structures commercially viable for an extended period of time. However, the City and the developer's vision is for much higher quality work spaces and hospitality opportunities that require significant upgrades to the stability of the soils and the infrastructure in the area. Another new use is not likely to be able to afford the costs of demolition and soils stabilization, especially on the scale of the proposed development, without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Therefore, the City concludes as follows: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax.increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be $421,890,074 (see "Appendix D of the'TIF Plan) c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $65,325,714 (see Appendix D of the TIF Plan). d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $356,564;360 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. 3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City -as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. The project to be assisted by the District will result inr increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased .tax base of the State and add. a high quality development to the City. Tax Increment Financing District Overview City of Edina Pentagon 'Park Tax Increment Financing District The following summary contains an overview of the basic elements of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. More detailed information on each of these topics can be found in the complete Tax Increment Financing Plan. Proposed action: ➢ Establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (District) and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan). Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area which includes the establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District, which represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area. Type of TIF District: A redevelopment district Parcel Numbers: 31- 028 -24 -33 -0010 31- 028 -24 -34 -0012 31- 028 -24 -33 -0014 31- 028 -24 -33 -0013 31- 028 -24 -33 -0018 31- 028 -24 -33 -0015 31- 028 -24 -33 -0025 31- 028 -24 -34 -0007 31- 028 -24 -34 -0008 31- 028 -24 -34 -0009 31- 028 -24 -43 -0002 31- 028 -24 -43 -0001 31- 028 -24 -43 -0003 31- 028 -24 -43 -0004 31- 028 -24 -43 -0005 31- 028 -24 -43 -0006 Proposed The District is being created to facilitate the multi -phase construction of Development: several hundred thousand square feet of new office space, adjacent public improvements, and other commercial development including, potentially, a hotel in the City. Please see Appendix A of the TIF Plan for a more detailed project description. Maximum duration: The duration of the District will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first increment (26 years of increment). The City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2018. It is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after December 31, 2043, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. Estimated annual tax Up to $6,544,578 increment: JWAW EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Authorized uses: The TIF Plan contains a budget that authorizes the maximum amount that may be expended: Land/Building Acquisition ................................................... $1,000,000 Site Improvements/Preparation .......... ............ ...................$30,241,000 Public.Utilities ................ ............................... .....................$1,847,000 Other Qualifying Improvements ............................ ............$39,224,000 Administrative Costs u 10% (P to ) ................. ....................$18,233.791 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL ........................... ...................$90,545,791 Interest ............................ ............................... ...................$80.032.553 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL ...................... ...................$170:578:344 See Subsection 2 -10, on page 2 -6 of the TIF Plan for the full budget authorization. Form of financing: The project is.proposed to be financed by a pay -as- you -go note. Administrative fee: Up to .10% of annual increment, if costs,are justified. Interfund Loan If the City wants to pay for administrative expenditures from a tax increment Requirement: fund, it is recommended that a resolution authorizing a loan from another fund be passed PRIOR to the issuance of the check. 4 Year Activity Rule After four years from the date of certification of the District one of the (§ 469.17.6 Subd. 6) following activities must have been commenced on each parcel in the District: • Demolition • . Rehabilitation • Renovation • Other site preparation (not including utility services such as sewer and water) If the activity has not been started by approximately February 2018, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel until the commencement of a qualifying activity. 5 Year Rule Within 5 years of certification revenues derived from tax increments must be (§ 469.1763 Subd. 3) expended or obligated to be expended. Any obligations in the District made after approximately February 2019, will not be eligible for repayment from tax increments. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the TIF Plan for the District, as required pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are included in Exhibit A of the City resolution. Page 2 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE MAP OF THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 01A,, and Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District 5'P" E Q Project Area m Pro p�S ��ntagon Park TIF District Englneemg eepL December. 2L•13 aim EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE MAP OF THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT _ �.�,, ,,1� �r tir . �.] ' � 1.' -�i •� �'ti'n] "" rim -^�'1 1 „� y L j �,-: S �i• y �, �+1 �, FRED RICHARDS COLE COURSE —P� �{ ~x � •�'�''�- •i.�Gif����{Y�.v��r���r �� � ,F{'@@aaao`o }�' � I;X �S; I. {' l re®� 1 /� c 1 tom`` p•,� lu � r@]zwooaa - et an]) ]+aa�woc',. n r r n / al @exaam@a 1 @ i D e i x,,1 P, ;j ..� � Q�t'�+ �;�,/ p/P �" � � , `�-'" d t _ _ m @eiu�cm+ .:• In @ex �� Ell I �a' 4• =y,,a,@•x.awe'i.`= -� - _ mHSt R'_ - ��L ^� ', 1 ���i '' ij j I �I i_.� . .T.'_.1 l oxex! c riox a .= : . �.% •._tm@` "rs@ Wnr� aeO@C Iat�.I . �r ].I _@ ^- ] x,i"4..- 1] JCl:01] J '�'. d 1' r 'e- ;I"r.p��,�,.Y_ y av,V6iyl.Pq, ' ��$w, r ))) t ) I 1�S. ~ �°_ '' � n `f'r � E :i r i liI 4 r .c . r ,� r '' i 1 Y'�k.r IL..� _ t7 31 ? 4�e i'' , • 'f' ' ' ��S" at L_ $ I pill s+/f ��- �.] ir-*T' WW r i e i -�-� . �- 5 4 I !v-`J; Ik'C t;,Ma 1.:', .ISt... .C: 11 -i 1 Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District I ^I' OProposed Pentagon Park TIF District Parcels 6 er. Page 4 E,H LE RS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE - b As of February 11, 2014 Draft for Public Hearing Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district) within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority City of Edina Hennepin County State of Minnesota Public Hearing: February 18, 2014 Adopted: Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 -1105 651 -697 -8500 fax: 651 - 697 -8555 www.ehlers - inc.com Table of Contents (for reference purposes only) Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area ............................ 1 -1 Foreword ............... ......... 1 -1 Section 2 - Tax,lncrement Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District ......................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -1. Foreword ................ ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -2. Statutory Authority ..................... ...- .................. 2 -1 Subsection 2 -3. Statement of Objectives ...... ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -4. Redevelopment Plan Overview ............................... 2 -1 Subsection 2 -5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired . 2 -2 Subsection 2 -6. Classification: of the District .. ............................... 2 -2 Subsection 2 -7. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District :.......... 2-4 Subsection 2 -8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax CapacityValue /Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements .............................. 2-4 Subsection 2 -9. Sources of Revenue /Bonds to be Issued ....................... 2 -6 Subsection 2 -10. Uses of Funds ......... .......:..................... `...... 2 -7 Subsection 2 -11. Fiscal Disparities Election ... ............................... 2 -7 Subsection 2 -12. Business Subsidies ......... ............................... 2 -8 Subsection 2 -13. County Road Costs .. .... :................................. 2 -9 Subsection 2 -14. Estimated.lmpact on Other,Taxing Jurisdictions ................. 2 -9 Subsection 2 -15. Supporting Documentation . ............................... 2 -12 Subsection 2 -16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues ....................... 2 -12 Subsection 2 -17. Modifications to the District . ............................... 2 -13 Subsection 2 -18. Administrative Expenses ... ............................... 2 -13 Subsection 2 -19. Limitation of Increment .... ............................... 2 -14 Subsection 2 -20. Use of Tax Increment ..... ............................... 2 -15 Subsection 2 -21. Excess Increments ....... ............................... 2 -15 Subsection 2 -22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer .............. 2 -16 Subsection 2 -23. Assessment Agreements .. ............................... 2 -16 Subsection 2 -24. Administration of the District . ............................... 2 -16 Subsection 2 -25. Annual Disclosure Requirements ........................... 2 -16 Subsection 2 -26. Reasonable Expectations .. ............................... 2 -18 Subsection 2 -27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment ................. 2 -18 Subsection 2 -28. Summary ............... ............................... 2 -19 Appendix A Project Description ....................... ............................... A -1 Appendix B Maps of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District .......... B -1 Appendix C Description of Property to be Included in the District ............... .............. C -1 Appendix D Estimated Cash Flow for the District ......... ............................... D -1 Appendix E Minnesota Business Assistance Form ........ ............................... E -1 Appendix F Redevelopment Qualifications for the District ... ............................... F -1 Appendix G Findings Including But/For Qualifications ...... ............................... G -1 Appendix H Building Permits .....:................... ............................... H -1 Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Foreword The following, text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area: This modification represents a continuation ofthe goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, the substantive changes include the establishment of Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area is recommended. It is available from the City Manager at the City of Edina. Other relevant information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1 -1 Section 2 - Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District Subsection 2 -1. Foreword The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA "), the City of Edina (the "City "), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (the "District "), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Subsection 2 -2. Statutory Authority Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes CVS.'), Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469374 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act "), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This'section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Subsection 2 -3. Statement of Objectives The District currently consists of sixteen parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights -of -way. The District is being created to facilitate the multi -phase construction of several hundred thousand square feet of new office space,. adjacent public improvements, and other commercial development including, potentially, a hotel in the City. Please see Appendix A for further District information. The HRA is in the process of negotiating an agreement with Hillcrest Development, and development is likely to occur in 2016. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District. Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the HRA or City and is further described in this TIF Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -1 Subsection 2 -5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights -of -way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed in Appendix C of this TIF Plan. Please also see the map in Appendix B for further information on the location of the District. The HRA or City may.acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights.of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the HRA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance ,and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The HRA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order.to achieve the objectives of this TIF Plan.' Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and-related costs. Subsection 2 -6. Classification of the District The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, as amended, inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is a redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) as defined below: (a) "Redevelopment district" means a type oftaxincrementfinancingdistrictconsistingofaproject, or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one or more of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists: (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; . (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used rail yards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights -of -way; (3) tankfacilities, orproperty whose immediatelyprevious use was for tankfacilities, as defined in Section 115C, Subd. 15, if the tank facility: (i) have or had a capacity of more than one million gallons; (ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; or (iii) have been removed, or are unused, underused, inappropriately used or infrequently used; or (4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in Subd. 10b. (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fireprotection including adequate egress, layout and condition ofinteriorpartitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -2 (c) A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard. (d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the finding under paragraph (a) or by the improvement described in paragraph (e) if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building or met the requirements ofparagraph (e), as the case may be, within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district-with the county auditor; (2) the substandard.building or the improvements described in paragraph (e) were demolished or removed by the authority or the demolition; or removal was financed by the authority or was done by a developer under a development agreement with the authority; (3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building or met the requirement ofparagraph (e) and that after demolition and clearance the authority intended to include the parcel within a district; and (4) upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district, the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (fi. (e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. (fl For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualify as a redevelopment district underparagraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of the district must satisfy paragraph (a). In meeting the statutory criteria the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings: • The District is a redevelopment district consisting of sixteen parcels. • An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures. • An inspection ofthe buildings located within the District finds that more than 50 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix F). Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -3 Pursuant to MS., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111 or 273.112 or Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. Subsection 2 -7. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to MS., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b., the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of 26 years of tax increment). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2018, which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2043, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date. Subsection 2 -8. Original.Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value /Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to M. S.; Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M. S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2013 for taxes payable 2014. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2018) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of. 1. Change in tax exempt status of property; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court- ordered abatements; 4. Change in the use of the property and classification; 5. Change in state law governing class rates; or 6. Change in previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2014, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2014. The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and.M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, upon completion of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2018. The Project Tax Capacity. (PTC) listed is an estimate ofvalues when the projects within the District are completed. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2A Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC) $8,812,299 Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) $371,498 Fiscal Disparities Reduction $2,855,308 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) $5,585,493 Original Local Tax Rate 1.17171 Estimated Pay 2014 Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Local Tax Rate) $6,544,578 Percent Retained by the HRA 100% Tax capacity includes a 0% inflation factor for the duration of the District. The'tax capacity included in this chart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity;of the District in year one is estimated to be $1,354,280. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The City has reviewed the area to be included in the District and has found building permits that were issued in the past 18 months prior to the public hearing. Please see Appendix H for the building permits that were issued. Subsection 2 -9. Sources of Revenue /Bonds to be Issued The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness as a result of the TIF Plan. As presently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by a pay -as- you -go note. Any refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. This provision does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are shown in the table below: SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL Tax Increment $155,071,222 Interest $15,507,122 TOTAL $170,578,344 The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments from the District in a maximum principal amount of $90,545,791. Such bonds may be in the form of pay -as- Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -5 you -go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval. Subsection 2 -10. Uses of Funds Currently- tinder consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate the multi -phase, construction of several hundred- thousand square feet of new office space, adjacent public improvements, and other commercial development including, potentially, a hotel in the City. The HRA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as described. The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this.TIF Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. USES OF TAX.INCREMENT FUNDS TOTAL Land/Building Acquisition $1,000;000 Site Improvements/Preparation $30,241,000 .Utilities. $1,847,000 Other Qualifying Improvements $41,950,669 Administrative Costs (up to 10 %) $15,507,122 PROJECT COST TOTAL $90,545,791 Interest $80.032,553 PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL $170,578,344 The total project cost, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in Subsection 2 -9. Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this TIF Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan. Subsection 2 -11. Fiscal Disparities Election Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the HRA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, (within the District) are followed, the following method of computation shall apply: (1) The original net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. The current net tax capacity shall exclude any fiscal disparity commercial - industrial net tax capacity increase between the original year and the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -6 current year multiplied by the fiscal disparity ratio determined pursuant 'to M.S., Section 276A.06, subdivision 7 or M.S., Section 473F.08, "subdivision 6 Where'the original net tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured 'tax capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original tax capacity is less than the 'current tax capacity, the difference between the original net tdr gpacity and the current net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority.. (2) The county auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority from the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by the extension of the less of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate to the retained captured net taz'capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority. The HRA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b. According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3: (c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in paragraph (b). Subsection 2 -12. Business Subsidies Pursuant to M.S., Section 116J.993, Subd. 3, the following forms of financial assistance are not considered a business subsidy: (1) A business subsidy of less than $150,0.00; (2) Assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses, such as a line of business, size, location, or similar general criteria; (3) Public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at the time the improvements are made; (4) Redevelopment property polluted by contaminants as defined in M.S., Section 116J.552, Subd. 3; (5) Assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing it up to code and assistance provided for designated historic preservation districts, provided that the assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost; (6) Assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is to provide those services; (7) Assistance for housing; (8) Assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 23; (9) Assistance for energy conservation; (10) Tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law; (11) Workers' compensation and unemployment compensation; (12) Benefits derived from regulation; (13) Indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions; Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -7 (14) Funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and bonds issued for the benefit of an- organization described in section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999; (15) Assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business; (16) Assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M.S., Section 469.174; Subd. 19 (17) Redevelopment when the recipient's, investment in the purchase of the site and in site- preparation is 70 percent or more of the assessor's current year's estimated market value; (18) General changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally technical nature; (19) Federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local government agency; (20) Funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority; (21) Business loans and:loari guarantees of $150,000 or less; (22) Federal loan funds provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration; and (23) Property tax abatements granted under M.S., Section 469.1813 to property that is subject to valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100. The HRA will comply with M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 to the extent the tax increment assistance under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions. Subsection 2 -13. County Road Costs Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. la, the county board may require the HRA or City to,pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to. be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or within.five years under another county plan. If the county elects to use increments to improve county.roads, it must notify the HRA or City within forty- five days of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the HRA and City and consultants, the proposed development outlined in this TIF Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads, therefore the TIF Plan was not forwarded to the county 45 days prior to. the public hearing. The HRA and City are aware that the county could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing. Subsection 2 -14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -8 IMPACT ON TAX BASE Estimated Estimated Captured Pay 2014 Tax Capacity (CTC) Percent of CTC . J6tal Net Upon Completion to Entity Total Tag Capacity Hennepin.County 1,236,174,443 5,585,493 0.4518% City of Edina 94,077,024 5,585,493 5.9371% ISD No. 273 80;662,848 5,585,493 6.9245% IMPACT ON TAX RATES The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the estimated Pay 2014 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on estimated Pay 2014 figures. The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2014 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is.estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is $155,071,222; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt:, An impact of the District on police protection is expected. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic, and additional overall demands to the call load. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment. The probable impact ofthe District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction. The existing buildings, which will be eliminated by the new development, have public safety concerns that include several unprotected old buildings with issues such as access, hydrant locations, and converted structures. The impact of the District on public . infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The current infrastructure for traffic movements, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be modified to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -9 Estimated Percent Potential Pay 2014 of Total CTC Taxes Extension Rates Hennepin County . 0.498590 42.55% 5,585,493 2,784,871 City of Edina 0.278010 23.73% 5,585,493 1,552,823 ISD No. 273 0.274140 23.40% 5,585,493 1,531,207 Other 0.120970 10.32% 5,585,493 675,677 Total 1.171710 100.00% 6,544,578 The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the estimated Pay 2014 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on estimated Pay 2014 figures. The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2014 rates, which were unavailable at the time this TIF Plan was prepared. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b): (1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is.estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be generated over the life of the District is $155,071,222; (2) Probable impact of the District on city provided services and ability to issue debt:, An impact of the District on police protection is expected. With any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New developments add an increase in traffic, and additional overall demands to the call load. The City does not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment. The probable impact ofthe District on fire protection is not expected to be significant. Typically new buildings generate few calls, if any, and are of superior construction. The existing buildings, which will be eliminated by the new development, have public safety concerns that include several unprotected old buildings with issues such as access, hydrant locations, and converted structures. The impact of the District on public . infrastructure is expected to be minimal. The current infrastructure for traffic movements, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be modified to handle the additional volume generated from the proposed development. Based on the development plans, there are no additional costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -9 and sidewalks. The development in the.'District is expected to contribute to sanitary sewer (SAC) and water (WAC) connection fees:,; The probable impact of any District general obligation tax increment bonds on the ability to issue debt for general fund, purposes is expected to be minimal. It is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this project, therefore there will be no impact on the City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's- debt 'limit: (3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over 'the life of the District that would be attributable to school district levies,; assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $36,286,666; (4) Estimated amount of.tax increment attributable to coun , levies. It is estimated that the amount of tax increments over the life of the District that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $65,982,805; (5) Additional information requested.by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any standard questions in a county or school district written,policy regarding tax increment districts and impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax increment financing plan. No requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the proposed development for the District have been received. Subsection 2 -15. Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 3, clause (b)(2) and the findings are required in the resolution approving the District. Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the HRA and City's findings: • TIF District Redevelopment Qualifications Report, LHB: January 13, 2014 Subsection 2 -16. Definition of.Tax Increment Revenues Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district include all of the following potential revenue sources: 1. Taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed under M.S., Section 469.177; 2. The proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, to the extent the property was purchased'by the Authority with tax increments; 3. Principal and interest received on loans or other advances made by the Authority with tax increments; 4. Interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments; 5. Repayments or return of tax increments made, to the Authority under agreements for districts for which the request for certification was made after `August 1, 1993; and 6. The market value homestead credit paid to the Authority under M.S., Section 273.1384. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -10 Subsection 2 -17. Modifications to the District In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any: 1. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the District, if the reduction does not meet the requirements of M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4(e); 2. Increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred; 3. A determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part, f the original TIF Plan; 4. Increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the HRA or City; 5. Increase in the estimate of the cost ofthe District, including administrative expenses, that will be paid or financed with tax increment from the District`; or 6. Designation of additional property to be acquired by the HRA or City, shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 4(fi, the geographic area of the District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county auditor. If a redevelopment district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the determination that the addition to the district meets the criteria of M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10, must be documented in writing and retained. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcel(s) from the District and (2)(A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax capacity or (B) the HRA agrees that, notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District. The HRA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification to the District. Modifications to the District in the form of a budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the TIF Plan. Subsection 2 -18. Administrative Expenses In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, administrative expenses means all expenditures of the HRA ror City, other than: 1. Amounts paid for the purchase of land;. 2. Amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the District; 3. Relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the District; or 4. Amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or 5. Amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clauses (1) to (3). For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, and before August 1, 2001, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -11 counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. Pursuant to.M.S., Section 469.176, Subd., ,3, tax increment maybe used to pay any authorized and documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total estimated tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined by M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less. For districts for which certification was requested afterJuly 31, 2001, no tax increment may be used to pay any administrative,, expenses for District costs which exceed ten percent of total estimated taxincrement I expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan orthe4otal tax.increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause'(1), from the District,-whichever is less. Pursuant 'to MS., Section 469.176, Subd 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for.the County's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the,District and are not subject to the percentage limits of M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3. The�county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the County Treasurer shall deduct an amount (currently .36 percent) of any increment distributed to the HRA or City and the County Treasurer shall pay the amount deducted to the State, Commissioner of Management and.Budget for deposit in the state, general fund to be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. This amount may be adjusted annually. by the Commissioner of Revenue. Subsection 2 -19. Limitation of Increment The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or redemption date. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6: if, after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax incrementfinancingdistrictpursuanttoMS ., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner oftheparcel in accordance with the tax incrementfinancing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original net tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from , the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on thatparcel including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax incrementfinancingplan, the authority shall certi,to the county auditor that the activity has commenced and the county auditor shall certify`the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by, the commissioner. ofrevenue and add it to the orig nal net tax capacity ofthe tax incrementfina'ncing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this. subdivision. The authority must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be submitted by February 1 ofthe fifth year following the year in which the parcel was certified Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -12 as included in the district. For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements of a, street are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation of a street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The HRA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately February 2018 and report such actions to the County Auditor. Subsection 2 -20. Use of Tax Increment The HRA or City hereby determines that if will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable property located in the District for the following purposes: .1. To pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project; 2. to. finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047; 3. To pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the TIF Plan; 4. To finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in MS., Section 469.176, Subd. 4; 5. To pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf of the HRA or City or for the benefit of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by a developer; 6. To finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the TIF Plan or pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and 7. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 4620, M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4. Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by Hennepin County to the HRA for the Tax Increment Fund of said District. The HRA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, and administration. Remaining increment funds will be used for HRA or City administration (up to 10 percent) and for the costs of public improvement activities outside the District. Subsection 2 -21. Excess Increments Excess increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, shall be used only to do one or more of the following: 1. Prepay any outstanding bonds; 2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment for any outstanding bonds; 3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of any outstanding bonds; or 4. Return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their local tax rates. The HRA or City must spend or return the excess increments under paragraph (c) within nine months after the end of the year. In addition, the HRA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to finance additional public costs in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 =13 Area or..the District. Subsection 2 -22. Requirements for Agreements. with the Developer The HRA or City will review;any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the Redevelopment Plan 'and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested-for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the HRA or. City to demonstrate the conformance of the development with City.plans and ordinances. The HRA or City may also use the Agreements to address other issues related to the development. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 5, no more than 25 percent, by acreage, of the property to be acquired in the District as set forth in the TIF Plan shall at any time be owned by the HRA or City as a result of acquisition with the:proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 25 percent of the acreage, the HRA or City concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of the property acquired and which provides recourse for the HRA or City should the development or redevelopment not be completed. Subsection 2 -23. Assessment Agreements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the HRA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears, in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the County Assessor shall also certify the minimum market value agreement. Subsection 2 -24. Administration of the District Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director. Subsection 2 -25. Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subds. 5, 6, and 6b the HRA or City, must undertake financial reporting for all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board and County Auditor on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an annual statement shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15. If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the OSA will direct the County Auditor to withhold the distribution of tax increment from the District. Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority ; Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -14 Subsection 2 -26. Reasonable Expectations As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value ofthe site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected :tax increments for the maximum duration ofthe District permitted by the TIF Plan. In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon written representation made by the developer to such effects and upon HRA and City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site(s) within the District. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix D, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the,proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the use of tax increments. Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the TIF Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047. Tax increments may not be used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No tax increment may be used for the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and ,regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the state or federal government. This provision does not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure. Pooling Limitations. At least 75 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not more than 25 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise, on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they were solely for activities outside of the District. Five Year Limitation on Commitment of Tax Increments. Tax increments derived from the District shall be deemed to have satisfied the 75 percent test set forth in paragraph (2) above only if the five year rule set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, has been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year following certification of the District, 75 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5. Redevelopment District. At least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment and renewal and renovation districts under M.S., Section 469.176 Subd. 4j. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of the land, the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary for development of the land, and installation of utilities, roads; sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -15 administrative expenses of the HRA or City, including the cost of preparation of the development action response plan, maybe included in the qualifying costs. Subsecti6n.2 -28. Summary The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The TIF Plan for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, telephone (651) 697 -8500. Edina Housing and. Redevelopment Authority Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District 2 -16 Appendix A Project Description The Pentagon Park Tax Increment District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Edina. The total development cost is estimated to be in excess of $500 million. The Project is focused on revitalizing an outdated 659,000 square foot office park first constructed in the 1960's. The redevelopment is expected to occur in stages over the next two to ten years. The City is currently in negotiations with Hillcrest Development over a redevelopment agreement. The proposed redevelopment may potentially include over 900,000 square feet of office, 60,000 square feet of retail, and 425 hotel units. Potential public improvements include pavement, sidewalk, intersection and streetscape improvements along West 77t' Street between Normandale and Parklawn, along Parklawn Avenue between West 76'" and 77'' Streets, and potential new public streets providing access throughout the parcel north of West 77°i St. Modifications to storm water control, landscaping and other related. improvements are also contemplated as part of project costs. The project will be financed by a pay -as- you -go note. More detailed information about the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area can be found in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan on file at the Edina City Hall. Appendix A -1 Appendix B Maps of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District Appendix B -1 1.494 Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 'SiA..1f, and Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District N w E 0 Y, Project Area ,� - }; S Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District Engineering Dept. December, 2013 i iw 0 0� '�- it ty. �'� ,rr�.,�� � � ;4. a \� i� �',• �„'i � '�� .a� :�I���M�q w �� �� �� _ .'t. At ,/E FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE, 1 a� 3102824430006 3102824430005 _.'..�,+�'_ -sue--'•+ w+..s. - > "" .. 3102824430004 _} j 310282433001£) - - -a - J .....3102824330025'_` - - Y 3102824340007 3102824340008 3102824340009 3102824430002 i Q 3102824430001 a _ . .•r� ..,,r' - .. I _ 3102824430003 .. • ,l Ra %. 31D2824330014 3102824330010 /_"3162824330013 W i k w t1. _ 3102824330012 3102824330015 a • F. ' 00 VIKING DR "A Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District 0 8 W +E UP Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District Parcels S Engineering Dept December, 2013 Appendix C Description of Property to be Included in the District The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights -of -way and abutting roadways identified by the parcels listed below. Parcel Numbers Address Owner 31- 028 -24 -33 -0010 4901 77th St. W Pentagon South LLC 31- 028 -24 -33 -0012 Address Unassigned Crown Bank 31- 028 -24 -33 -0014 4815 77th St. W Pentagon South LLC 31- 028 -24 -33 -0013 Address Unassigned Pentagon South LLC 31- 028 -24 -33 -0018 4820 77th St. W FYT LLC 31- 028 -24 -33 -0015 7710 Computer Ave Crown Bank 31- 028 -24 -33 -0025 4700 77th St. W Realty Associates Iowa Corp 31- 028 -24 -34 =0007 4660 77th St. W Pentagon North LLC 31- 028 -24 -34 -0008 4600 77th St. W Pentagon North LLC 31- 028 -24 -34 -0009 4570 77th St. W Pentagon North LLC 31- 028 -24 -43 -0002 4540 77'h St. W Pentagon North LLC 31- 028 -24 -43 -0001 4550 77th St. W Pentagon North LLC 31- 028 -24 -43 -0003 4510 77th St. W Pentagon South LLC •31- 028 -24 -43 -0004 4530 77th St. W Pentagon South LLC 31- 028 -24 -43 -0005 7600 Parklawn Ave Pentagon South LLC 31- 028 -24 -43 -0006 7600 Parklawn Ave Pentagon South LLC Appendix C -1 I Appendix D Estimated Cash Flows for the District Appendix D -1 1/17/k... . DistrictType: District Name /Number: County District #: First Year Construction or Inflation on Value Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining Inflation Rate - Every Year: Interest Rate: Present Value Date: First Period Ending Tax Year District was Certified: Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: Years of Tax Increment Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA] Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate Maximum /Frozen Local Tax Rate: Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) State -wide Tax Rate (Comm.And. only used for total taxes) Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 ja EHLERS tl ADI RS +N 1'Jlltlr. I MARC I Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 1 City of Edina 495,000 sq. ft office, 425 room hotel, and 30,000 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Redevelopment Tax Rates VALUE •- • N (Original Tax Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00% 2016 Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) Building First $150,000 1.50% 0.00% Tax Year Over $150,000 2.00% 6.00% After Commercial Industrial Class Rate (CA) 2.00% 1- Aug -15 Market Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25% 1- Feb -16 Tax Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) After Pay 2014 Map # PID Owner Address First $100,000 0.75% 2018 for District Over $100,000 0.25% 26 Tax Capacity Non- Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 2043 2,984,600 First $500,000 1.00% Inside(B) 2,985,600 Over $500,000 1.25% Incremental CA Pref. Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) 3102824330013 Pentagon S LLC 32.4014% Pay 2014 First $500,000 1.00% 163.1210% Pay 2014 Over $500,000 1.25% 117.171% Pay 2014 Agricultural Non - Homestead 1.00% 117.171% Pay 2014 100% 843,900 53.0000% Pay 2014 16,878 CA 0.22925% Pay 2014 174,000 0 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Esgmates Only N:wllnnsotalEDINA \Housing Economic RedevelopmenhTlRTIF DistrictsTentagon ParkITIF Runs\Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)Tentagon Park T1F Phase 1 nun -Inflated values 1.14.14 BASE VALUE •- • N (Original Tax Capacity) Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Area/ Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 3102824330010 Pentagon S LLC 2,984,600 1,000 2,965,600 100% 2,985,600 Pay 2014 CA Pref. 58,962 CA Pref. 58,962 3102824330013 Pentagon S LLC 35,500 0 35,500 100% 35,500 Pay 2014 CA 710 CA 710 3102824330014 Pentagon S LLC 663,300 180,600 843,900 100% 843,900 Pay 2014 CA 16,878 CA 16,878 3102824330012 Crown Bank 174,000 0 174,000 100% 174,000 Pay 2014 CA 3,480 CA 3,480 3102824330015 Crown Bank 770,900 550,300 1,321,200 100% 1,321,200 Pay 2014 CA Pref. 25,674 CA Pref. 25,674 5,360,200 105,704 105,704 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Esgmates Only N:wllnnsotalEDINA \Housing Economic RedevelopmenhTlRTIF DistrictsTentagon ParkITIF Runs\Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)Tentagon Park T1F Phase 1 nun -Inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 40 EHLERS UAU1:RSM PUatIC IIIIANCt Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 1 City of Edina 495,000 sq. ft office, 425 room hotel, and 30,000 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. which cannot be predicted. PROJECT INFORMATION (Project Tax Capacity) •- WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM Total Property Taxes ota Isca oca Estimated Taxable te-wt a Total Taxable Property New Market Value - Est. 237,002,040 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Yeai Property Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxel Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. Ft. /Unit Per Sq. FtJUnit Sq. FtJUnits Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2016 2017 2018 2019 Payable Group 182 Office 274 274 495,000 135,428,040 CA 2,708,561 5 50% 75% 100% 100% 2020 Hotel 220,000 220,000 425 93,500,000 CA 1,870,000 4,400 0% 50% 100% 100% 2020 Retail 269 269 30,000 8,074,000 CA 161,480 5 0% 100% 100% 100% 2019 TOTAL 237,002,040 4,740,041 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficandy from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. CALCULATIONS TAX •- WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM Total Property Taxes ota Isca oca oca Isca te-wt a ar et New Market Value - Est. 237,002,040 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. Tax Disparities Tax Property Disparities Property Value Total Taxes Per New Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. FtJUnit Office 2,708,561 877,612 1,830,949 2,145,341 1,431,569 1,435,537 310,469 5,322,916 10.75 Hotel 1,870,000 605,906 1,264,094 1,481,151 988,360 991,100 214,349 3,674,960 8,646.97 Retail 161 480 52 322 109 158 127 902 85 348 85 584 18 510 317 344 10.58 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficandy from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. •- WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM Total Property Taxes 9,31 ,220 Current Market Value - Est. 5,360,200 less State -wide Taxes (2,512,222) New Market Value - Est. 237,002,040 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (2,505,277) Difference less Market Value Taxes (543,327) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (83,724) Difference Annual Gross TIF 3,57U,571 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Pre; .hlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:UMnnsotMEDINA\Housing Economic ;)merd\TIF\TIF DisbiclsTentagon Perk \TIF RunsWpdated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Park TIF Phase 1 run - Inflated 14.14 1/171 Tax Increment Casht,' ,e 3 EHLERS �loy In rU9Ut InAnrl Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 7 City of Edina 495,000 sq. ft office, 425 room hotel, and 30,000 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Protect Original Fiscal ,t Captured Local Annual Saml Annual State Admin. Semi Annual Semi -Annual PERIOD % of =Tax � Taxi , Disparities- �,1`�Tax F? Tai 2', � Gross Tax - Gross Tax Auditor at Net Taz Present ENDING Tax Payment OTC ' + -0aoaclty `Ceoae"' Ancremental :Caoaelty Rated 'Increment Increment .''0.36% 10/ .._ Increment Value Yrs. Year Date 08/01/16 02/01/17 08/01/17 02/01/18 100% 1,354,280 (105,704) (404,556) 844,020 117.171% 988,947 494,473 (1,780) (49,269) 443,424 371,361. 0.5- 2018 08/01/18 494,473 (1,780) (49,269), 443,424 731,905 1 2018 02101/19 100% 3,127,901 (105,704) (979,234) 2,042,963 117.171% 2,393,760 1,196,880 (4,309) (119,257) 1,073,314 1,579,189::- 1.5 2019 08/01/19 1,196,880 (4,309) (119,257) 1,073,314 2,401,795 2 2019 02/0120 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 3,626,466 2.5 2020 08/01/20 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 4,815,467 3 2020 0210121 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 5,969,836 3.5 2021 08/01/21 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 7,090,584 4 2021 02/0122 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 8,178,688 4.5 2022 " - 08/01122 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 9,235,100 5 2022 02/01/23 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117:171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 10,260,743 5.5 2023 08101/23 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 11,256,512 6 2023 02101/24 - 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 1,17.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 12,223,279 6.5 2024 0810124 - 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 13,161,887 _ 7 2024 0210125 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 14,073,157 7.5 2025 08/0125 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873)" 1,645,855 14,957,886 8 2025 0210126 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 15,816,845 8.5 2026 08/0126 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 16,650,786 9 2026 02/01/27 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 17,460,438 9.5 2027 08/0127 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 18,246,508 10 2027 02/0128 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 19,009,682 10.5 2028 0810128 1,835,335 (6,607) - (182,873) 1,645,855 19,750,628 11 2028 02/0129 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 20,469,994 11.5 2029 0810129 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 21,168,406 12 2029 02/01/30 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 21,846,477 12.5 2030 08/01/30 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 22,504,798 13 2030 02101131 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 - 23,143,944 13.5 2031 08101/31 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 23,764,475 14 2031 02/01/32 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590). 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 24,366,932 14.5 2032 08/01/32 -- _ .. 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 24,951,842 15 , 2032" 02/01/33. - -. 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 25,519,715 15.5 2033 08/01/33 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 26,071,049 16 2033 02/01/34 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% - 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 26,606,324 16.5 2034 08/01/34 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 27,126,009 17 2034 02/01/35 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 27,630,557 17.5 2035 08/01/35 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 28,120,409 18 2035 02/01/36 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 28,595,994 18.5 2036 08/01/36 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 29,057,728 19 2036 02/01/37 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 29,506,012 19.5 2037 08/01137 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 29,941,240 - 20 2037 02/01/38 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 30,363,791 20.5 2038 08/01/38 - 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 30,774,035 21 2038 02/01/39 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 31,172,330 21.5 2039 08/01/39 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 31,559,024 22 2039 02/01/40 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 31,934,455 22.5 2040 08/01/40 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 32,298,952 23 2040 02/01/41 100% .4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 32,652,832 23.5 2041 08/01/41 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 32,996,404 24 2041 02/01/42 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 - 33,329,970 24.5 2042 08101/42 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 33,653,821 25 2042 02/01/43 100% 4,740,041 (105,704) (1,501,590) 3,132,747 117.171% 3,670,671 1,835,335 (6,607) (182,873) 1,645,855 33,968,238 25.5 2043 08/01/43 1,835 335 (6,607) (182.873) 1,645,855 34 273 498 26 2043 02/01/44 9 - Total , -- 91,478,805 (329,324) (9,114,948) 82,034,533 I Present Value From 08/01/2016 Present Value Rate 6.00 % 38,219,264 (137,589) (3,808,166) 34,273,496 Prepared by Elvers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NWinnsotMEDINAI-iousinp Economic RedevelupmennTIMIF DlstrictsWentapon Perk \TIF RunslUpdated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscel Impects)%PentaBon Perk TIF Phase 1 run - Inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 DlstrlctType: District Name /Number: County District M First Year Construction or Inflation on Value Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining Inflation Rate - Every Year: Interest Rate: Present Value Date: First Period Ending Tax Year District was Certified: Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: Years of Tax Increment Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA] Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: Current Loral Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) State -wide Tax Rate (Comm.And. only used for total taxes) Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) ja EHLERS I AOCHS:N PUBLIC IIIIANCl. Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2a City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 22,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Redevelopment 2017 25 0.00% 6.00% 1- Aug -15 1- Feb-16 Pay 2014 2019 25 2043 Inside(B) Incremental 32.4014% Pay 2014 163.1210% Pay 2014 117.171% Pay 2014 117.171% Pay 2014 53.0000% Pay 2014 0.22925% Pay 2014 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 Tax Rates BASE Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00% Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) Capacity) First $150,000 1.50% Over $150,000 2.00% Commercial Industrial Class Rate (CA) 2.00% Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25% Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) Tex Year First $100,000 0.75% Over $100,000 0.25% Non - Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) Market First $500,000 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) Original First $500,000 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% Agricultural Non - Homestead 1.00% Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12.18 -2013. PreF hle.8 Assodates, Inc. - EsBmates Only N:WlinnsotalEDINAUiousing Ewnomic F .mentkTIFNTIF DlsdictslPentagon Park1TIF RunslUpdated Runs 1.14.14(Flscal Impacts)1Pentagon Perk T1F Phase 2a run - Inflated 14.14 BASE VALUE •' • N (Original Tax Capacity) Building Total Percentage Tex Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Area/ Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 3102824330018 FYT LLC 762,300 167,400 929,700 100% 929,700 Pay 2014 CA Pref. 17,844 CA Pref. 17,844 3102824340007 Pentagon N LLC 2,013,900 1,000 2,014,900 100% 2,014,900 Pay 2014 CA Pref. 39,548 CA Pref. 39,548 2,944,600 57,392 57,392 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12.18 -2013. PreF hle.8 Assodates, Inc. - EsBmates Only N:WlinnsotalEDINAUiousing Ewnomic F .mentkTIFNTIF DlsdictslPentagon Park1TIF RunslUpdated Runs 1.14.14(Flscal Impacts)1Pentagon Perk T1F Phase 2a run - Inflated 14.14 1/174.. 40 EHLERS L 1. Al11, HS iN PfflltIC IINANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2a City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 22,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. PROJECT •' • Capacity) ota Isca oca oca Estimated Taxable fate -w a Total Taxable Property Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Year Property Value Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxes Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. FtJUnit Per Sq. FtJUnit Sq. FUUnits Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity /Unit 2017 2018 2019 2020 Payable Group Office 220 220 197,500 43,392,067 CA 867,841 4 50% 100% 100% 100% 2020 Group 3 Retail 269 269 2,500 672,833 CA 13,457 5 50% 100% 100% 100% 2020 Walsh Retail 269 269 20,000 5,382,667 CA 107,653 5 100% 100% 2019 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM FOR Total Property Taxes 1,943,506 Current Market Value - Est. 2,944,600 less State -wide Taxes (524,144) New Market Value - Est. 49,447,567 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (522,695) Difference less Market Value Taxes (113,359) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (45,458) Difference Annual Gross TIF 737,850 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NANnnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Radevelopment\TIF\TIF Distdcts\Pentagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts) \Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2a fun - Inflated values 1.14.14 CALCULATIONS TAX ota Isca oca oca Isca fate -w a ar et Tax Disparities Tax Property Disparities Property Value Total Taxes Per New Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. FtJUnit Office 867,841 281,193 586,649 687,382 458,684 459,956 99,476 1,705,499 8.64 Retail 13,457 4,360 9,097 10,658 7,112 7,132 1,642 26,445 10.58 Retail 107 653 34 881 72 772 85 268 56 899 57 056 12 340 211 562 10.58 11 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS EXCLUDED FROM FOR Total Property Taxes 1,943,506 Current Market Value - Est. 2,944,600 less State -wide Taxes (524,144) New Market Value - Est. 49,447,567 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (522,695) Difference less Market Value Taxes (113,359) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (45,458) Difference Annual Gross TIF 737,850 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NANnnsota\EDINA\Housing Economic Radevelopment\TIF\TIF Distdcts\Pentagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts) \Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2a fun - Inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 Prep, Tax Increment Cashitow- Page 3 EHLERS 1V.O19i 14 PUCt1�11HA: r1 Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2a City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 22,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values I Project,, original - Fiscal,, Captured Local .Annual",,, Sam[-Annual State Admin. Semi- Annual Seml-Annual PERIOD %of Tax a f _ Tax cDlsperltles �, ,`Tarr j r .Tai Gross Tax Grose Tex Auditor at Net Tax Present ENDING Tax Payment OTC �Caoaclty s'Caoacity :`'Incremental Caoaulv,. Rater "Ihcrementr Increment .Increment Value Yrs. Year Data era a Associates, Inc. - Eaamatee Only N' WinmotalEDINAWous - do RedmelopmentITIFITIF DistdctsTentagon Park1TIF RumlUpdated Runs 1.14.14(Fiwal Impacte)1Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2a run - Inflate 14.14 - - - - 08/01/16 - - - - 02/01117 - - - - 08/01/17 _ - - - 02/01/18 - 08/01/18 - - - - 02/01/19 100% 548,302 (57,392) (159,062) 331,849 117.171% 388,830 194,4700) 15 ( (19,372) 174,344 137,629 0.5 2019 08/01/19 194,415 (700) (19,372) 174,344 271,248 1 2019 02/01/20 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,650 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 517,423 1.5 2020 08/01/20 368,925 (1,328) (36,760). 330,837 756,427 2 2020 02/01/21 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328). (36,760) 330,837 988,469 2.5 2021 08/01/21 368,925 (1,328)- (36,760) - 330,837 1,213,753 3 2021 ,- 02/01/22 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760)..•. 330,837 1,432,476 3.5 2022 08/01/22 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) - 330,837 1,644,828 4 2022 02/01/23 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760)• 330,837 - 1,850,995 4.5, 2023 08/01/23 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 2,051,157 5 2023 02/01/24 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 {1,328) (36,760) 330,837 2,245,489 5.5 2024 08/01/24 ` 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 2,434,161 6 2024 02/01/25 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) - (36,760) 330,837 2,617,337 6.5 2025 08/01/25 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 2,795,179 7 2025 02/01/26 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 2,967,840 7.5 2026 08/01/26 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837_ 3,135,473 - 8 2026 02101/27 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 - (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 3,298,223 8.5 2027 08/01/27 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 --: 3,456,233 9 2027 02101/28 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 3,609,640 - 9.5 - -2028 08101128 - 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 _ 3,758,580 10 2028 02101/29 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 3,903,181 10.5 2029 08/01/29 - 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 4,043,571 11 2029 02/01/30 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760)'. 330,837 - 4,179,871 11.5 2030 08/01130 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 4,312,202 12 2030 02101/31 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 4,440,679 12.5 = 2031 08/01/31 - 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 33D,837 4,565,413 13 2031 02101/32 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) - 330,837 4,686,514 13.5 - 2032 08101/32 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 4,804,088 14 2032 02101/33 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 4,918,238 14.5 2033 08/01/33 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 5,029,063 15 2033 02101/34 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 33D,837 5,136,660 15.5 2034 08/01/34 368,925 (1,328) (36,760). -. 330,837 5,241,123 16 2034 02/01/35 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) _ (36,760) 330,837 5,342,543 16.5 2035 08/01135 368,925 (1,328) (36,760), 330,837 5,441,010 17 2035 02/01/36 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 5,536,608 17.5 2036 08/01/36 ' 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 5,629,422 18 2036 02/01/37 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 5,719,533 18.5 2037 08/01/37 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 - 5,807,019 19 2037 02/01/38 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 5,891,957 19.5 2038 08/01/38 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 - 5,974,422 20 2038 02101/39 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,054,484 20.5 2039 08/01/39 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,132,214 21 2039 02/01/40 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,207,681 21.5 2040 08/01/40 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,280,949 22 2040 02101/41 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,352,083 22.5 2041 08/01/41 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,421,146 23 2041. 02/01/42 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629;721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) - 330,837 6,488,196 23.5 2042 08/01142 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,553,294 24 2042 02/01143 100% 988,951 (57,392) (301,838) 629,721 117.171% 737,850 368,925 (1,328) (36,760) 330,837 6,616,496 24.5 2043 08/01/43 368,925 (1,328) (36,76D) 330,837 6,677,857 .. 25 2043 02/01/44 Total 18,097,242 (65,150) (1,803,209) 16,228,882 j Present Value From 0810112015 Present Value Rate 6.00% 7,446,649 (26,808) (741,984) 6,677,657 I era a Associates, Inc. - Eaamatee Only N' WinmotalEDINAWous - do RedmelopmentITIFITIF DistdctsTentagon Park1TIF RumlUpdated Runs 1.14.14(Fiwal Impacte)1Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2a run - Inflate 14.14 1/1 7/k, - . 10 EHLERS I I'ADrRS M VU1111C 1111ANrl Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2b City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. It retail - Shenehon values ASSUMPTIONS AND RATES DistrictType: Redevelopment Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) District Name /Number: Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) County District M 1.50% Over $150,000 First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2019 2.00% Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining 23 Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) Inflation Rate - Every Year: 0.00% 0.75% Interest Rate: 6.00% Non - Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) Present Value Date: 1- Aug -19 1.00% First Period Ending 1- Feb -20 Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) Tax Year District was Certified: Pay 2014 1.00% Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2021 Agricultural Non - Homestead Years of Tax Increment 23 Orig. Tax Cap. Phase Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2043 100% Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NAI Inside(B) CA Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Incremental 40,192 Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 32.4014% Pay 2014 Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 163.1210% Pay 2014 Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 117.171% Pay 2014 Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 117.171% Pay 2014 State -wide Tax Rate (Comm.And. only used for total taxes) 53.0000% Pay 2014 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.22925% Pay 2014 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 Tax Rates VALUE Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00% Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) First $150,000 1.50% Over $150,000 2.00% Commercial Industrial Class Rate (CA) 2.00% Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25% Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) Current First $100,000 0.75% Over $100,000 0.25% Non - Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) Original First $500,000 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) _Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value First $500,000 1.00% Over $500,000 1.25% Agricultural Non - Homestead 1.00% BASE VALUE •' • N (Original Tax Capacity) Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Area/ _Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 3102824340008 Pentagon N LLC 2,008,600 1,000 2,009,600 100% 2,009,600 Pay 2014 CA 40,192 CA 40,192 2,009,600 40,192 40,192 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only MUnnsota\EDIMI-Iousing Economic Redevelopmenl\TIRTIF Districts\Pentegon Park\TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts) \Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2b mn - Inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 EHLERS 11 Apt HS PUII \1C TIN AN CI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2b City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. PROJEC T INFORMATION • .. ota Tax New Use Capacity Estimated Taxable oca Tax Capacity Total Taxable Property te-w Property Taxes Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Year Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxes Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. FtJUnit Per Sq. FtJUntt Sq. FtJUnits Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2019 2020 2021 2022 Payable Group 4 Office 220 220 197,500 43,392,067 C/I 867,841 4 50% 100% 100% 100% 2022 Group 4 Retail 269 269 2,500 672,833 C/I 13,457 5 50% 100% 100% 100% 2022 TaT ",064,900 881,298 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. 1-1- 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS • • FROM TIF? MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR Total Property Taxes 1,731,944 Current Market Value - Est. 2,009,600 less State -wide Taxes (467,088) New Market Value - Est. 44,064,900 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (465,797) Difference less Market Value Taxes (101,019) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (31,834) Difference Annual Gross TIF 666,206 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prep ,filers 8 Assodates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:UMnnsota\EDINAWousing Economic R nent\TIF\TIF DistdctsTerdagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacls)1Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2b run - Inflated .4.14 CALCULATIONS TAX ota Tax New Use Capacity Isca Disparities Tax Capacity oca Tax Capacity ca Property Taxes sca Disparities Taxes te-w Property Taxes &I ar e Value Taxes Total Taxes Taxes Per Sq. Ft. /Unit Office 867,841 Retail 13457 281,193 4,360 586,649 8 087 687,382 10 658 458,684 7 112 459,956 7 132 99,476 1542 1,705,499 28 445 8.64 10.68 15 1-1- 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS • • FROM TIF? MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR Total Property Taxes 1,731,944 Current Market Value - Est. 2,009,600 less State -wide Taxes (467,088) New Market Value - Est. 44,064,900 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (465,797) Difference less Market Value Taxes (101,019) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (31,834) Difference Annual Gross TIF 666,206 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prep ,filers 8 Assodates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:UMnnsota\EDINAWousing Economic R nent\TIF\TIF DistdctsTerdagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacls)1Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2b run - Inflated .4.14 1/17. Tax Increment Cashflo% a 3 EHLERS ,I AUr NS IN PuUIlG IINANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2b % of Tax OTC Caoac City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values 1ginal Fiscal Captured Local Annual Semi - Annual State Admin. Semi - Annual Semi - Annual PERIOD Tax Disparities Tax Tax Gross Tax Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Present ENDING Tax Payment pacity Incremental Capacity Rate Increment Increment 0.36% 10% Increment Value I Yrs. Year Date 08101/20 02/01/21 100% 440,649 (40,192) (129,754) 270,703 117.171% 317,186 158,593 (571) (15,802) 142,220 126,360 0.5 2021 08/01/21 158,593 (571) (15,802) 142,220 249,040 1 2021 02/01/22 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 499,208 1.5 2022 08/01/22 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 742,090 2 2022 02/01/23 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 977,897 2.5 2023 08101/23 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 1,206,836 3 2023 02/01/24 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 1,429,107 3.5 2024 08/01/24 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 1,644,904 4 2024 02/01/25 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 1,854,415 4.5 2025 08/01/25 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,057,825 5 2025 02/01/26 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,255,309 5.5 2026 08/01126 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,447,042 6 2026 02/01/27 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,633,191 6.5 2027 08/01/27 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,813,917 7 2027 02/01/28 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 2,989,380 7.5 2028 08/01128 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,159,732 8 2028 02/01/29 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,325,122 8.5 2029 08/01/29 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,485,696 9 2029 02/01/30 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,641,592 9.5 2030 08/01/30 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,792,947 10 2030 02/01/31 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 3,939,895 10.5 2031 08/01/31 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,082,562 11 2031 02/01/32 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,221,074 11.5 2032 08/01/32 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,355,551 12 2032 02/01/33 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,486,112 12.5 2033 08/01/33 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,612,870 13 2033 02/01/34 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,735,936 13.5 2034 08/01/34 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,855,418 14 2034 02/01/35 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 4,971,419 14.5 2035 08/01/35 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,084,042 15 2035 02/01/36 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,193,384 15.5 2036 08/01/36 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,299,542 16 2036 02101/37 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,402,608 16.5 2037 08/01/37 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,502,672 17 2037 02/01/38 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,599,821 17.5 2038 08/01/38 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,694,141 18 2038 02/01139 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,785,714 18.5 2039 08/01/39 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,874,619 19 2039 02/01/40 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 5,960,935 19.5 2040 08/01/40 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,044,737 20 2040 02/01/41 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,126,098 20.5 2041 08101/41 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,205,090 21 2041 02/01/42 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,281,781 21.5 2042 08/01/42 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,356,237 22 2042 02/01/43 100% 881,298 (40,192) (272,530) 568,576 117.171% 666,206 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 298,713 6,428,526 22.5 2043 08/01143 333,103 (1,199) (33,190) 296,713 6,498,709 23 2043 02/01/44 Total 14,973,719 (53,905) (1,491,981) 13,427,832 Present Value From 0810112019 Present Value Rate 6.00% 71246,876 (26 089) (722,079) 6,498,709 Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:\Minnsola \EDINA \Housing Economic Redevelopment \TIF \TIF Districts\Pentagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts) \Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2b run - Inflated values 1.14.14 ivitIXIIII 1 Qj EHLERS t.LAD(N5IN PUBLIC rIIIANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2c City of Edina 197,500 sq. It office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values DNS AND R4 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 DistrictType: Redevelopment BASE Tax Rates •' • District Name /Number: County District #: Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00% First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2021 Tax Year Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) Current Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining 21 First $150,000 1.50% Inflation Rate - Every Year: 0.00% Original Over $150,000 2.00% Interest Rate: 6.00% Conversion Areal Commercial Industrial Class Rate (CA) 2.00% Present Value Date: 1- Aug -19 for District Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25% First Period Ending 1- Feb -20 Conversion Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) 3102824340009 Pentagon N LLC Tax Year District was Certified: Pay 2014 803,600 First $100,000 0.75% Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2023 16,072 Over $100,000 0.25% Years of Tax Increment 21 1,000 Non- Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) 100% Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2043 CA First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA] Inside(B) Over $500,000 1.25% Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Incremental Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) 31,060 Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 32.4014% Pay 2014 First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 163.1210% Pay 2014 Over $500,000 1.25% Maximum/Frozen Local Tax Rate: 117.171% Pay 2014 Agricultural Non - Homestead 1.00% Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 117.171% Pay 2014 State -wide Tax Rate (Comm./Ind. only used for total taxes) 53.0000% Pay 2014 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.22925% Pay 2014 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prep .hlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:wlinnsota\EDINAU-Iousing Economic I Iment\TIMIF Districts\Pentagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentegon Park T1F Phase 2c run 4nllated 14.14 y BASE VALUE •' • (Original Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Areal Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 3102824340009 Pentagon N LLC 802,600 1,000 803,600 100% 803,600 Pay 2014 CA 16,072 CA 16,072 3102824430001 Pentagon N LLC 748,400 1,000 749,400 100% 749,400 Pay 2014 CA 14,988 CA 14,988 1,553,000 31,060 31,060 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prep .hlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:wlinnsota\EDINAU-Iousing Economic I Iment\TIMIF Districts\Pentagon Perk \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentegon Park T1F Phase 2c run 4nllated 14.14 y 1/17/2014 10 EHLERS 61 Apses NPUnLIC rINANO Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2c City of Edina 197,500 sq. It office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. PROJECT INFORMATION (Project Ta x Capacity) I Estimated Taxable oca Tax Ca aci ty Total Taxable Property a e-wru a Property Taxes Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Year Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxes Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. FL/Unit Per Sq. FtJUnit Sq. Ft./Units Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity /Unit 2021 2022 2023 2024 Payable Group 5 Office 220 220 197,500 43,392,067 CA 867,841 4 50% 100% 100% 100% 2024 Group 5 Retail 269 269 2,500 672,833 CA 13,457 5 50% 100% 100% 100% 2024 Ta ia,9 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. vuio. 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS • • FROM TIF? MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR Total Property Taxes 1,731,944 Current Market Value - Est. 1,553 ,000 less State -wide Taxes (467,088) New Market Value - Est. 44,064,900 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (465,797) Difference less Market Value Taxes (101,019) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (24,601) Difference 39 4 99 Annual Gross TIF 673,439 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NAMInnsota\EDINAU-lousing Economc RedsveIDpment\TIFITIF DistdctstPentagon ParMTIF Runs\Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2c run -Inflated values 1.14.14 CALCULATIONS TAX o Tax New Use Capacity lsca Disparities Tax Capacity oca Tax Ca aci ty oca Property Taxes Disparities Taxes a e-wru a Property Taxes ar e Value Taxes Total Taxes Taxes Per Sq. FtJUnIt Office 867,841 Retail 13457 281,193 4 360 586,649 9 097 687,382 10 658 458,684 7 112 459,956 7,132 99,476 1 542 1,705,499 26 445 8.64 10.58 46 7g7 46 u vuio. 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signficantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. WHAT IS • • FROM TIF? MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR Total Property Taxes 1,731,944 Current Market Value - Est. 1,553 ,000 less State -wide Taxes (467,088) New Market Value - Est. 44,064,900 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (465,797) Difference less Market Value Taxes (101,019) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (24,601) Difference 39 4 99 Annual Gross TIF 673,439 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NAMInnsota\EDINAU-lousing Economc RedsveIDpment\TIFITIF DistdctstPentagon ParMTIF Runs\Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2c run -Inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 %, of Tax Tax Disparities Tax OTC Caoacity Capacity Incremental Caoac Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3 19 EHLERS LI AOI N� IN POIII_II; IINANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2c City of Edina 197,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Tax Gross Tax I Gross Tax Auditor at Net Tax Present I ENDING Tax Payment PreE ihiers & Associates. Inc. - Estimates Only NWInnsotMEDINAWousing Economic Redeve rIF\TIF DlstriclsiPentagon Park\TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Perdagon Park TIF Phase 2c run - Inflated L ,4.14 - - - - ucru Irzu 08101/20 02101/21 08/01/21 02/01122 08/01122 - - - 02/01123 100% 440,649 (31,060) (132,713) 276,876 117.171% 324,419 162,209 (584) (16,163) 145,463 114,830 0.5 2023 08/01/23 162,209 (584) (16,163) 145,463 226,315 1 2023 02/01/24 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 450,999 1.5 2024 08101/24 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 669,139 2 2024 02/01/25 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 880,925 2.5 2025 08/01/25 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 1,086,543 3 2025 02/01/26 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 1,266,172 3.5 2026 08101/26 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 1,479,986 4 2026 02/01127 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 1,668,156 4.5 2027 08/01127 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 1,850,845 5 2027 02/01/28 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,028,212 5.5 2028 08/01/28 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,200,414 6 2028 02/01129 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,367,600 6.5 2029 08/01/29 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,529,917 7 2029 02/01/30 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,687,506 7.5 2030 08/01130 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,840,504 8 2030 02/01131 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 2,989,047 8.5 2031 08/01/31 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,133,263 9 2031 02/01/32 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,273,279 9.5 2032 08/01/32 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,409,217 10 2032 02/01133 100% 861,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,541,195 10.5 2033 08/01133 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,669,329 11 2033 02/01134 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,793,731 11.5 2034 08/01/34 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 3,914,510 12 2034 02101/35 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,031,771 12.5 2035 08/01/35 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,145,616 13 2035 02/01/36 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,256,146 13.5 2036 08/01/36 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,363,456 14 2036 02/01/37 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,467,641 14.5 2037 08/01/37 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,568,792 15 2037 02101/38 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,666,996 15.5 2038 08/01/38 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,762,340 16 2038 02/01139 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,854,907 16.5 2039 08/01/39 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 4,944,777 17 2039 02101/40 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,032,030 17.5 2040 08/01/40 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,116,742 18 2040 02/01/41 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,198,987 18.5 2041 08/01141 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,278,836 19 2041 02/01142 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,356,359 19.5 2042 08/01/42 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,431,624 20 2042 02/01/43 100% 881,298 (31,060) (275,489) 574,749 117.171% 673,439 336,720 (1,212) (33,551) 301,957 5,504,698 20.5 2043 08/01143 336,720 (1 212) (33,551) 301,957 5,575,642 21 2043 02101144 Total 13,793,202 (49,656) (1,374,355) 12,369,191 Present Value From 08/0112019 Present Value Rate 6.00% 6,217,541 (22,363) (619,516) 5,575,642 PreE ihiers & Associates. Inc. - Estimates Only NWInnsotMEDINAWousing Economic Redeve rIF\TIF DlstriclsiPentagon Park\TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Perdagon Park TIF Phase 2c run - Inflated L ,4.14 1/17/2014 EHLERS tl ADI R51N 1`UIILIr, IINANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2d City of Edina 297,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values DNS AND R4 Base Value Assumptions - Page 1 DistrictType: Redevelopment BASE Tax Rates •- • N District Name /Number: Capacity) County District #: Exempt Class Rate (Exempt) 0.00% First Year Construction or Inflation on Value 2023 Tax Year Commercial Industrial Preferred Class Rate (CA Pref.) Current Existing District - Specify No. Years Remaining 19 First $150,000 1.50% Inflation Rate - Every Year: 0.00% Original Over $150,000 2.00% Interest Rate: 6.00% Conversion Area/ Commercial Industrial Class Rate (CA) 2.00% Present Value Date: 1- Aug -19 for District Rental Housing Class Rate (Rental) 1.25% First Period Ending 1- Feb -20 Conversion Affordable Rental Housing Class Rate (Aff. Rental) 3102824430002 Pentagon N LLC Tax Year District was Certified: Pay 2014 750,100 First $100,000 0.75% Cashflow Assumes First Tax Increment For Development: 2025 15,002 Over $100,000 0.25% Years of Tax Increment 19 886,900 Non - Homestead Residential (Non -H Res. 1 Unit) 100% Assumes Last Year of Tax Increment 2043 CA First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Election [Outside (A), Inside (B), or NA] Inside(B) 744,000 Over $500,000 1.25% Incremental or Total Fiscal Disparities Incremental Pay 2014 Homestead Residental Class Rate (Hmstd. Res.) 14,900 Fiscal Disparities Contribution Ratio 32.4014% Pay 2014 First $500,000 1.00% Fiscal Disparities Metro-Wide Tax Rate 163.1210% Pay 2014 Over $500,000 1.25% Maximum /Frozen Local Tax Rate: 117.171% Pay 2014 Agricultural Non- Homestead 1.00% Current Local Tax Rate: (Use lesser of Current or Max.) 117.171% Pay 2014 1,712,600 Pay 2014 State -wide Tax Rate (Comm.And. only used for total taxes) 53.0000% Pay 2014 34,252 Market Value Tax Rate (Used for total taxes) 0.22925% Pay 2014 6,857,500 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:wlinnsota\EDINA \Housing Economic Redevelopment \TIF\TIF DistdctstPentagon Park\TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Perk TIF Phase 2d run -inflated values 1.14.14 BASE VALUE •- • N (Original Tax Capacity) Building Total Percentage Tax Year Property Current Class After Land Market Market Of Value Used Original Original Tax Original After Conversion Area/ Map # PID Owner Address Market Value Value Value for District Market Value Market Value Class Tax Capacity Conversion Orig. Tax Cap. Phase 3102824430002 Pentagon N LLC 749,100 1,000 750,100 100% 750,100 Pay 2014 CA 15,002 CA 15,002 3102824430003 Pentagon N LLC 1,050,300 886,900 1,937,200 100% 1,937,200 Pay 2014 CA 38,744 CA 38,744 3102824430004 Pentagon N LLC 744,000 1,000 745,000 100% 745,000 Pay 2014 CA 14,900 CA 14,900 3102824430005 Pentagon N LLC 971,700 740,900 1,712,600 100% 1,712,600 Pay 2014 CA 34,252 CA 34,252 3102824430006 Pentagon N LLC 969,700 742,900 1,712,600 100% 1,712,600 Pay 2014 CA 34,252 CA 34,252 6,857,500 137 150 137,150 Note: 1. Base values are based upon review of County website on 12 -18 -2013. Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only N:wlinnsota\EDINA \Housing Economic Redevelopment \TIF\TIF DistdctstPentagon Park\TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Perk TIF Phase 2d run -inflated values 1.14.14 1/17/2014 EHLERS t1. ADI:'R$:N PUIItIC IMANCI Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2d City of Edina 297,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Base Value Assumptions - Page 2 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. PROJECT • ' • N (Project Tax Capacity) o Estimated Taxablei LOUdl Total Taxable Property fate -w a Percentage Percentage Percentage Percentage First Yea Market Value Market Value Total Market Tax Project Project Tax Completed Completed Completed Completed Full Taxe! Area/Phase New Use Per Sq. FtJUnit Per Sq. FtJUnit Sq. Ft. /Units Value Class Tax Capacity Capacity/Unit 2023 2024 2025 2026 Payable Group 6 Office 220 220 297,500 65,362,733 CA 1,307,255 4 50% 100% 100% 100% 2026 Retail 269 269 4M 2,500 672,833 CA 13,457 5 50% 100% 100% 100% 2026 C6. 66,036,567 1,320,711 Note: 1. Market values are based upon estimates provided by Shenehon on 1 -9 -2014. Note; CALCULATIONS TAX o rsca ] LOUdl L oca Isca fate -w a ar e Current Market Value - Est. 6,657,500 Tax Disparities Tax Property Disparities Property Value Total Taxes Per New Use Capacity Tax Capacity Capacity Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Taxes Sq. FtJUnit Office 1,307,255 423,569 883,686 1,035,424 690,930 692,645 149,844 2,569,042 8.64 Retail 13,457 4 360 9 097 10 658 7 112 7,132 1,542 26,445 10.58 11 luz 0 Note; 1. Taxes and tax increment will vary signfrcantly from year to year depending upon values, rates, state law, fiscal disparities and other factors which cannot be predicted. MARKET VALUE BUT / FOR WHAT IS • • FROM TIF? Total Property Taxes 2,595,488 Current Market Value - Est. 6,657,500 less State -wide Taxes (699,977) New Market Value - Est. 66,035,567 less Fiscal Disp. Adj. (698,042) Difference less Market Value Taxes (151,387) Present Value of Tax Increment less Base Value Taxes (108,631) Difference Annual Gross TIF 937,451 Value likely to occur without Tax Increment is less than: Prep Mars 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NWinnsotMEDINAUiousing Econoadc F nenffIF\TIF DlstnctsTentagon Park \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscal Impacts)\Pentagon Park T1F Phase 2d run - Inflated 14.14 1 HN Q)EHLERS 6CAOt.s; ie vqutiG noASel Pentagon Park TIF District - Phase 2d City of Edina 297,500 sq. ft office and 2,500 sq. ft retail - Shenehon values Tax Increment CashOo% 3 of OTC Project = Taz - Capacity ,' Original Fiscal - Taz Dls arlties p Capacity 'Incremental Captured c Local.- Taz Taz Capacity = - 'Rate' .. Annual Gross Tax Increment' Semi- Annual Gross Tax Increment State Auditor 0.36% - Admin. at 10% ,;, -_ Semi-Annual' Net Tax Increment Semi - Annual Present Value PERIOD ENDING Yrs. Tax Year Payment Ym Date 02/01/20 08/01/20 02/01 /21 08/01/21 02/01/22 08/01122 02/01/23 08/01 /23 - 02101/24 08/01/24 - 02/01/25 100% 660,356 (137,150) (169,526) 353,680 117.171% 414,410 207,205 (746) (20,646) 185,813 130,326 0.5 2025 08/01/25 207,205 (746) (20,646) 185,613 256,855 1 2025 02101/26 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 534,746 1.5 2026 08/01/26 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 804,542 2 2026 02/01/27 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 1,066,481 2.5 2027 08/01/27 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 1,320,790 3 2027 02/01/28 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 1,567,692 3.5 2028 08/01/28 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 1,807,403 4 2028 02/01129 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 2,040,132 4.5 2029 08/01/29 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 2,266,082 5 2029 02/01/30 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 2,485,452 5.5 2030 08/01/30 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 2,698,432 6 2030 02/01/31 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 2,905,208 6.5 2031 08/01/31 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 3,105,962 7 2031 02/01/32 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 3,300,869 7.5 2032 08/01132 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 3,490,099 8 2032 02/01/33 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 3,673,817 8.5 2033 08/01/33 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 3,852,185 9 2033 02/01/34 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,025,357 9.5 2034 08/01/34 468,726 (1,667) (46,704) 420,334 4,193;485 10 2034 02/01/35 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,356,716 10.5 2035 08/01/35 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,515,193 11 2035 02101/36 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,669,055 11.5 2036 08/01/36 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,818,435 12 2036 02/01/37 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 4,963,464 12.5 2037 08/01/37 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,104,268 13 2037 02/01/38 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,667) (46,704) 420,334 5,240,972 13.5 2038 08/01/38 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,373,694 14 2038 02101/39 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 466,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,502,550 14.5 2039 08/01/39 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,627,654 15 2039 02/01/40 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,749,113 15.5 2040 08/01/40 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 5,867,035 16 2040 02/01/41 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 466,726 (1,667) (46,704) 420,334 5,981,522 16.5 2041 08/01/41 468,726 (1,667) (46,704) 420,334 6,092,675 17 2041 02/01/42 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 6,200,590 17.5 2042 08/01/42 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 6,305,362 18 2042 02/01/43 100% 1,320,711 (137,150) (383,490) 800,071 117.171% 937,451 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 6,407,082 18.5 2043 08/01143 468,726 (1,687) (46,704) 420,334 6,505,840 19 2043 02/01/44 Total 17,288,529 (62,239) (1,722,629) 15,503,661 Present Value From 08/01/2019 Present Value Rate 6.00 % 7.254.829 126.1171 1722.8711 6.505.840 Prepared by Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. - Estimates Only NMinnsotatEDIWI-Iousing Economic Redevelopment\TIFRIF DlstrlctslPentagon Park \TIF Runs \Updated Runs 1.14.14(Fiscel Impacts)%Pentagon Park TIF Phase 2d run - Inflated values 1.14.14 Appendix E Minnesota Business Assistance Form (Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development) A Minnesota Business Assistance Form (MBAF) should be used -to report and/or update each calendar year's activity by April 1 of the following year. Please see the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) website at http: / /www. deed. state. mn. us / Community /subsidies/MBAFForm.htm for information and forms. a�^ Appendix E -1 REPORT OF INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND RESULTS FOR DETERMINING QUALIFICATIONS OF A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AS A REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT Pentagon Park TIF District Edina, Minnesota January 13, 2014 Prepared for the City of Edina Prepared by LHB, Inc. 701 Washington Avenue North, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 LHB Project No. 130270.00 Appendix F Redevelopment Qualifications for the District Appendix F -1 PART 1— EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF EVALUATION LHB was hired by the City of Edina to inspect and evaluate the properties within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District ( "TIF District ") proposed to be established by the City. The proposed TIF District is concentrated along West 77`x' Street and is roughly bounded by Parklawn Avenue to the east, Fred Richards Golf Course to the North, and Highway 100 to the west (Diagrams 1). The purpose of LHB's work is to determine whether the proposed TIF District meets the statutory requirements for coverage, and whether the eighteen (18) building's on sixteen (16) parcels, located within the proposed TIF District, meet the qualifications required for a Redevelopment District. Diagram I — Proposed TIF District SCOPE OF WORK The proposed Pentagon Park TIF District consists of sixteen (16) parcels with eighteen (18) structures, inspected on June 18, 2013, June 25, 2013 and November 25, 2013. A draft TIF report was prepared on October 4, 2013, including thirteen non - contiguous parcels with fifteen buildings. In November, 2013, three additional parcels (with three buildings) were added to the proposed District, allowing for one contiguous Redevelopment TIF District. City of Edina building permit records were reviewed to ensure that previously- inspected buildings had not been improved between June 18, 2013 and this current report. Previous Architectural, Structural, and Environmental reports made available by the Owner were also consulted in the preparation of this analysis. LHB - generated Building Code and Condition Deficiency reports are located in Appendix B. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 — EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................... ............................... 2 Purpose of Evaluation ............................................................. ............................... 2 Scopeof Work ........................................................................ ............................... 2 Conclusion.............................................................................. ............................... 3 PART 2 — MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS ............. 3 A. Coverage Test ................................................................... ............................... 3 B. Condition of Buildings Test .............................................. ............................... 4 PART 3 — PROCEDURES FOLLOWED E PART4 — FINDINGS ..................................................................................... ............................... 5 A. Coverage Test ................................................................... ............................... 5 B. Condition of Building Test ............................................... ............................... 6 1. Building Inspection .............................................. ............................... 6 2. Replacement Cost ................................................. ............................... 6 3. Code Deficiencies ................................................ ............................... 7 4. System Condition Deficiencies ............................ ............................... 7 C. Distribution of substandard structures .............................. ............................... 8 PART 5 - TEAM CREDENTIALS ................. APPENDIX A TIF Analysis Summary Spreadsheet APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX C Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs .... 10 CONCLUSION After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the proposed TIF District qualifies as a Redevelopment District because: • The proposed TIF District has a coverage calculation of 100 percent which is above the 70 percent requirement. • 56 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard which is above the 50 percent requirement. e The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District. The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail. PART 2 — MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS The .properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), which states: Interior Inspection "The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." , Exterior Inspection and Other Means "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation "Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)." Qualification Requirements Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (a) (1) requires two tests for occupied parcels: A. Coverage Test ... "parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the. district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots" 3 The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or paved or,gravel parking lots unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains building, streets, utilities, or paved or gravel parking lots." B. Condition of Buildings Test ... "and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;" Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section', 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, `structurally substandard' shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire proiection including adequate egress, layout and condition of :interior o partitions, similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." a. We do not count energy code deficiencies toward the thresholds required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b)) defined as "structurally substandard ", due to concerns expressed by the State of Minnesota Court of Appeals in the Walser Auto Sales, Inc. vs. City of Richfield case filed November 13, 2001. 2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which'states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square - footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, e_ lectrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building 'is not disqualified] include recent fire or police inspections, on -site property appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." LHB counts energy code deficiencies toward the 15 percent code threshold required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c)) for the following reasons: The Minnesota energy code is one of ten building code areas highlighted by the Minnesota Department of Labor and` Industry website where minimum construction standards are required by law. • The index page of the 2007 Minnesota Building Code lists the Minnesota Energy Code as a "Required Enforcement" area compared to an additional list of "Optional Enforcement" chapters. • The Senior Building Code Representative for the Construction Codes and Licensing Division of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry confirmed that the Minnesota Energy Code is being enforced throughout the State of Minnesota. • In a January 2002 report to the Minnesota Legislature, the Management Analysis Division of the Minnesota Department of Administration confirmed that the construction cost of new buildings. complying with the Minnesota Energy Code is higher than buildings built prior to the enactment of the code. • Proper TIP, analysis requires a comparison 'between the replacement value of a new building builti under current code standards with the repairs that would. be necessary to bring the existing building up to current code standards. In order for an equal comparison to be, made, all applicable code chapters should be applied to both.. scenarios., Since current construction estimating software automatically applies the construction cost of complying with the Minnesota Energy Code, energy code deficiencies should also be identified in the existing structures. PART 3 — PROCEDURES FOLLOWED LHB was able to inspect the Pentagon Park office buildings during the day of June 18, 2013, June 25, 2013 and November. 25, 2013. The inspections were limited to what could be seen walking through the buildings as no destructive testing or material removal was undertaken. In addition, we reviewed a significant number of Architectural, Structural and Environmental reports outlining the results of recent thorough investigations of each building. PART 4 — FINDINGS A. Coverage Test The total square foot area of the parcels in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, GIS mapping and site verification. 2. The total square foot area of buildings and site improvements on the parcels in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, GIS mapping, site verification, and recent investigative reports. 3. The percentage of coverage for each parcel in the proposed TIF District was computed to determine if the 15 percent minimum requirement was met. The total square footage of parcels meeting the 15 percent requirement was divided into the total square footage of the entire district to determine if the 70 percent requirement was met. Finding: The proposed TIF District met the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which resulted in parcels consisting of 100 percent of the area of the proposed TIF District being occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures (Diagram 2). This exceeds the 70 percent area coverage requirement for the proposed TIF District under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision (a) (1). All W7iTm3T p- -- -- I - � 14 1, i It �: ?{p►" Iih .�l /;:41- ,�.r.. 11J Drive r ���iL _ s� m �— aS_� -•- - u��1..� � ®c � - Diagram 2 — Coverage Diagram Shaded area depicts a parcel more than 15 percent occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, Paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures B. Condition of Building Test 1. Building Inspection The first step in the evaluation process is the building inspection. After an initial walk -thru, the inspector makes a judgment whether or not a building "appears" to have enough defects or deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. If it does, the inspector documents with notes and photographs code and non -code deficiencies in the building. 2. Replacement Cost The second step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement cost. This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works square foot models for 2013. A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office, retail, residential, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry, etc.), and 6 building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost, which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota. Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural fees, legal fees or other "soft" costs not directly related to construction - activities. Replacement cost for each building is tabulated in Appendix A. 3. Code Deficiencies The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies exist with "respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to new buildings in the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. As a result, it was necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for each building in the proposed TIF District. The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. LHB utilizes the current Minnesota State Building Code as the official code for our evaluations. The Minnesota State Building Code is actually a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to the adopted international codes. After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost Works 2013; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the identified deficiencies. We were than able to compare the correction costs with the replacement cost of each building to determine if the costs for correcting code deficiencies meet the required 15 percent threshold. Finding: In total, thirteen (13) out of eighteen (18) buildings (72 %) in the proposed TIF District contained code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold' required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). A complete Building Code and Condition Deficiency report for the buildings in the proposed TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report. 4. System Condition Deficiencies If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then in order for such building to be "structurally substandard" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building's defects or deficiencies should be of sufficient total significance to justify "substantial renovation or. clearance." Based on this definition, LHB re- evaluated each of the buildings that met the code deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision. =10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted "substantial renovation.or clearance" based on the criteria we outlined above. Based on our initial evaluation, buildings that did not "visibly" appear .to be substandard or were likely not to be found substandard due to recent investments, were•not evaluated further. System condition deficiencies are a measurement of. defects or substantial deterioration in site elements, ;structure, exterior envelope, mechanical, and electrical components, fire protection' and emergency systems, interior partitions, ceilings, floors and doors. The evaluation of system condition deficiencies was made'by. reviewing all available information contained 'in City records, and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings. LHB only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible upon our inspection of the building or contained in City records. We did not consider the amount of "service life" used up for a particular component unless it was an obvious part of that component's deficiencies. After identifying, the system condition deficiencies in each building, we used our professional judgment to determine if the list of defects or deficiencies is of sufficient total significance to justify "substantial renovation or clearance." Finding: In our professional opinion, ten (10) out of eighteen (18) buildings (56 %) in the proposed TIF District are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in .essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. This exceeds the 50 percent requirement of Subdivision 10a(l). C. Distribution of substandard structures Much of this report has focused on the condition of individual buildings as they relate to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10. It is also important to look at the distribution of substandard buildings throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District (Diagram 3). Finding: The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District. rM 7 n- i lE 11g'Df1V2 Diagram 3 — Substandard Buildings Light Red shaded area depicts parcels with substandard buildings — Darker Red shade depicts substandard buildings E PART 5 - TEAM' CREDENTIALS Michael A: Fischer, AL4, LEED AP - Project. Pr Michael has twenty -four years of architectural experience as project principal, project manager, project designer:: and .project architect on municipal planning, educational, commercial and governmental projects. He is a Senior Vice President at LHB and currently leads the Minneapolis office. Michael completed a two -year Bush Fellowship, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1999, , earning Masters Degrees in City Planning and Real Estate Development. Michael has served on over 35 committees, boards and community task forces, including a term as a City' Council President, Chair of a Metropolitan Planning organization, and most recently, Chair of the Planning Commission in Edina, Minnesota. He was one of four architects in the country to receive the National "Young Architects Citation" from the American Institute of Architects in 1997. Philip Waugh — Project Manager/TIFAnalyst Philip is a project manager with 13 years of experience in historic preservation, building investigations,, material research, and construction methods. He previously worked as a historic preservationist and also served as the preservation specialist at the St. Paul Heritage Preservation Commission. Currently, Phil sits on the Board of Directors for the Preservation Alliance of Minnesota. His current responsibilities include project management of historic preservation projects, performing building condition surveys and analysis, TIF analysis, writing preservation specifications, historic design. reviews, writing Historic Preservation Tax Credit applications, preservation planning, and grant writing. Ben Trousdale, AL4 — Inspector Ben is a project architect in LHB's Minneapolis office with 20 years of experience working on a variety of multi - family housing and commercial projects. He .has extensive skills in creating quality construction documents that convey a building's fundamentals and unique design details. His responsibilities include project management, code analysis, and overseeing document production. Ben is' a licensed architect in Minnesota and is involved with AIA activities including Search for Shelter charrettes. M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Final Report\Final\Revised Final Report 1- 13- 14\Pentagon Park Redevelopment TIF Report 1- 14-14.doc APPENDICES APPENDIX A Property Condition Assessment Summary.Sheet APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports APPENDIX C Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs 10 APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map No. IA 4901 77`'' Street W Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6.18.2013, 6.25.2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $5,445,132.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,880,275.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 34.5% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Interior columns in garage are spalling concrete 2. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 3. Parking garage walls and tunnels show significant water intrusion B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service does not have sufficient capacity for new HVAC and elevator c. No elevator in building to provide accessible route from lower lever to main level 2. Light and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building is not sprinkled 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) b. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms c. Tile in stairs is worn and stained d. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations Page 1 of 2 Exterior Construction a. Main entry exterior tile floor is buckling and joints are open b. Metal clad columns are rusting at base c. Metal guardrails are rusting'at base d. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated e. Timber wall leading to parking garage is showing signs of rot and movement f. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying g. Roof downspouts are not functioning properly resulting in water saturating the building wall and causing mold on brick h. There is water infiltration in tunnel structures that connect buildings resulting in musty/moldy smells i. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (7701 Normandale Drive, 4960, 4901, 4900 Viking Drive) are nearly identical in configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape, two levels (lower level and main level) and arranged so that they form arms that radiate from a central office tower (4940 Viking Drive). The buildings are sited into slopes in such a way that the main level entrance is accessed off a parking lot at grade but the lower levels are accessed on the rear of the building at a lower grade to allow for automobile entry. Each building in the grouping has a lower level that contains a parking garage, tenant space, and a tunnel accessing the central office tower. The only internal vertical circulation between floors is a single stairway. The buildings were found to have. significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new electrical service required by new HVAC and elevator 2. Provide elevator as there is no accessible route from lower level to upper level 3. Provide sprinkler for building interior 4. Provide code compliant hand rails 5. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 6. Provide ADA compliant entrance at front of building 7. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID ]a 4901 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 2 of 2 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map No. lb 4900 Viking Drive Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interiof/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $5,445,132.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,693,190.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 31% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Interior columns in garage are spalling concrete 2. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 3. Parking garage walls and tunnels show significant water intrusion B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service does not have sufficient capacity for new HVAC and elevator c. No elevator in building to provide accessible route from lower lever to main level 2. Lia_ ht and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building is sprinkled- though the main entrance is not Accessible 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are riot code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) b. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes c. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms d. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations e. Some walls only partially painted f. Interior of tunnels shows significant water damage and stains on walls g. Paint on CMU walls blistering h. Floors tiles are cracked, broken, and stained i. Severe efflorescence on interior of garage wall 5. Exterior Construction. a. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated b. Site. landscaping is primarily dead or dying c. Roof drains daylight`at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall d. There is water infiltration in tunnel structures that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells e. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm `to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (7701 _ Normandale Drive, 4960, 4901, 4900 Viking Drive) are nearly identical in configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape, two levels (lower level and main level) and arranged so that they form arms that radiate from a central office tower (4940 Viking Drive). The buildings are sited into slopes in such a way that the main level entrance is accessed off a parking lot at grade but the lower levels are accessed on the rear of the building at a lower grade to allow for automobile entry. Each building in the grouping has a lower level that contains a parking garage, tenant space, and a tunnel accessing the central office tower. The only internal vertical circulation between floors is a single stairway. The buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution as existing do not meet current ventilation codes 2. Provide new electrical service required by new HVAC and elevator 3. Provide elevator as there is no accessible route from lower level to upper level 4. Provide code compliant hand rails 5. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 6. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID lb 4900 Viking Drive Redevelopment District Substandard Building Repon.doc PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID lc 4940 Viking Drive Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $13,884,000.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: . . $5,096,633:28 Percentage of Replacement, Cost: 37% Descrintion.of.Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building,is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies inessential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation,, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify,.substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs. — significant water intrusion issue 2. Water infiltration into tunnels is occurring B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service not sufficient for new HVAC c. Elevator cabs, shafts and equipment rooms do not meet code 2. Light and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are.non- thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress .a. Building not sprinkled (basement sprinkled) b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify.hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non- permissible openings size) b. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes c. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms above basement level d. Interior finishes are significantly worn e. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations Page 1 of 2 Exterior Construction a. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated b. Sidewalks adjacent to the buildings have slumped or sunken c. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying d. There is water infiltration tunnels that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells e. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1966 by the mpredecessor firm to ..Opus Corporation, the structure at 4940 Viking Drive is six stories tall plus a basement with no enclosed parking. The building sits at the center of the adjacent radiating buildings (7701 Normandale Drive, 4960, 4901, 4900 Viking Drive). The central building utilizes a tunnel system to connect to each adjacent building allowing for access to their enclosed parking areas. The building was found to have significant HVAC, electrical, and life safety code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Additionally, much of the building common spaces were worn and outdated including and most notably the restrooms. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution: a. Remove and replace existing combustible materials in plenum 2. Provide new electrical service of capacity required by HVAC and new elevator 3. Provide 2 new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 4. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room 5. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 6. Provide code compliant hand rails and guards on stairs 7. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 8. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID lc 4940 Viking Drive Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 2 of 2 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address:' Map ID I 4960 Viking Drive Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/20139 "6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $4,172,467.20 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,489,592.00 `Percentage of Replacement Cost: 35.7% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision' -10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 2. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service not adequate for new HVAC and Elevator loads 2. Light and Ventilation a. Building insulation is inadequate b. No vapor barrier present c. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails are not code complaint (lack of extension) b. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms c. No Accessible route between floors (no elevator) d. Interior tunnel CMU walls peeling and" showing water damage e. Tunnel floor tiles cracked and stained or missing f. Carpet in hallways worn and dirty g. Walls in garage severely saturated h. Interior vent register louvers broken i. Garage floor at storage rooms mismatched and damaged Page 1 of 2 Exterior Construction a. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated b. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying c. Building address number missing "0" — fallen off d. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting iri water saturating the building wall e. Timber retaining wall rotted and collapsing at garage f. Paver joints at main entry open g. Main entrance guard rusting at bottom — paint coming off h. Rear fire escape guard rusting i. Metal on column rusting on bottom j. There is water infiltration in tunnels that connect building to main tower building resulting in musty /moldy smells k. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (7701 Normandale Drive, 4960, 4901, 4900 Viking Drive) are nearly identical in configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape, two levels (lower level and main level) and arranged so that they form arms that radiate from a central office tower (4940 Viking Drive). The buildings are sited into slopes in such a way that the main level entrance is accessed off a parking lot at grade but the lower levels are accessed on the rear of the building at a lower grade to allow for automobile entry. Each building in the grouping has a lower level that contains a parking garage, tenant space, and a tunnel accessing the central office tower. The only internal vertical circulation between floors is a single stairway. The buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Of note, buildings 7701 and 4960 have interior office construction that is severely impacted, and will require complete renovation to bring to useable condition. It appears as if the building interiors were undergoing a demolition that was halted at the midway point. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution as existing do not meet current ventilation codes 2. Provide new electrical service required by new HVAC and elevator 3. Provide elevator as there is no accessible route from lower level to upper level 4. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 5. Provide code compliant hand rails 6. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 7. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID I Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 2 of 2 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID le 7701 Normandale Drive Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15 %o of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $4,172,467.20 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $1,489,592.00 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 35.70% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial, renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Cracking and. spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 2. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service not, adequate for new HVAC and Elevator loads c. No elevator from garage to main level 2. Light and Ventilation a. Building insulation is inadequate b. No vapor barrierpresent ` c. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum d. Most lighting has been damaged/removed remaining lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate" Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building c. Walls separating basement parking from other uses do not meet code 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Interior office build out damaged beyond repair — must be replaced b. Hallways damaged beyond repair c. Missing ACT d. Wall finishes ripped e. Holes in walls f. Stair handrails are not code complaint (lack of extension) Page 1 of 2 g. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms h. No Accessible route between floors (no elevator) 5. Exterior Construction a. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated b. Main entrance not ADA accessible c. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying d. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall e. There is water. infiltration in tunnels that connect building to main tower building resulting in musty /moldy smells f. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (7701 Normandale Drive, 4960, 4901, 4900 Viking Drive) are nearly identical in configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape, two levels (lower level and main level) and arranged so that they form arms that radiate from a central office tower (4940 Viking Drive). The buildings are sited into slopes in such a way that the main level entrance is accessed off a parking lot at grade but the lower levels are accessed on the rear of the building at a lower grade to allow for automobile entry. Each building in the grouping has a lower level that contains a parking garage, tenant space, and a tunnel accessing the central office tower. The only internal vertical circulation between floors is a single stairway. The buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Of note, buildings 7701 and 4960 have interior office construction that is severely impacted and will require complete renovation to bring to useable condition. It appears as if the building interiors were undergoing a demolition that was halted at the midway point. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution as existing do not meet current ventilation codes 2. Provide new electrical service required by new HVAC and elevator 3. Provide elevator as there is no accessible route from lower level to upper level 4. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 5. Provide code compliant hand rails 6. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 7. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 8. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID le 7701 Normandale Drive Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 2 of 2 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID 3a 4660 77`h Street West Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013; 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $8,109,288.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building. Code Deficiencies: $1,710,489.86 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 21% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Building entries are severely deteriorated with structural steel corrosion and spalled concrete; wood . blocking has been inserted to aid in supporting the failing. entries. 2. Entrance stairs have settled and are separating from building 3. There are cracks radiating from jamb of several windows 4. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 5. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing electrical service is located in stairwell and does not comply with current code b. Elevator cabs, shafts and equipment rooms do not meet code 2. Light and Ventilation a. Building insulation is inadequate b. No vapor barrier present c. Windows are non- thermally broken single pane aluminum d. Lighting does not meet current energy code Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Interior stairs (both sets) rise and run do not meet code — stairs not code compliant b. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) c. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes and wall mounted electrical equipment. d. Link structure interior is moldy due to roof failure 4. Exterior Construction a. Front of building not Accessible Page 1 of 3 b. ADA entry at rear of building; handicap operators not functioning; this entry is not at primary fagade. c. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated d. Parking area abuts building with improper terminations e. Sidewalks adjacent to the buildings have slumped or sunken f. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying g. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall h. There is water infiltration in link structures that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells i. Area well stairs not code compliant j. Area well block walls have step cracks k. Roof is at end of lifecycle and requires replacement 1. Mechanical equipment on roof is inadequately supported in several locations —concerns expressed by Structural Engineer regarding amount of equipment on roof and capacity of roof to carry the new load m. Ducts improperly supported at roof n. Metal cladding wrapping exterior columns is corroded at the bases Environmental The following Environmental reports were made available by the Owner: a. Environmental Evaluation, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. L The report detected petroleum and non - petroleum contamination and recommended that the Site (4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street) be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP) and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program. b. Phase ,I Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. c. Asbestos. and Lead -Based -Paint Assessment Report, Pentagon Park — istar 4530 -4660 West 77`b Street, Edina, MN Braun Intertec Corporation September 20, 2012. L The report confirmed the presence of Friable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM), Category I Non - Friable ACM, and Category II Non - Friable ACM. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Minnesota Administrative Rule. Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." ii. The report confirmed the presence of loose and flaking lead- based -paint in subject buildings and associated garage. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (4600, 4620, 4640, and 4660) are nearly identical in size, configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape and arranged so that they form an open sided square set back off West 77'h with parking in the interior. All buildings have main entrances on the south (interior) side which are not Accessible. There are Accessible entrances on the rear (north) that are in various states of usability. 4660 was renovated in 2001 for a single tenant so has newer HVAC and has been sprinkled. In general the buildings in this grouping were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Additionally, the buildings have undergone inspections for hazardous materials and it was determined that both lead based paint and asbestos containing materials are present in the buildings. Of note, the Page 2 of 3 Owner of the complex is undertaking a partial renovation of an adjacent, similar building and has found that the City of Edina has required compliance with the current energy code related to wall assembly, however, this study will not consider energy code within the code deficiencies calculation. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Move electrical service out of stairwell and upgrade to capacity required by HVAC 2. Provide new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 3. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room ` 4. Provide code compliant stairs with hand rails and guards 5. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 6. Replace roof 7. Provide adequate mechanical equipment supports on roof M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design\406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID 3a 4660 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 3 of 3 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID 3b 4640 77`x' Street West Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $8,109,288.00 Estimated. Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $3,164,841.06 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 39% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Building entries are severely deteriorated with structural steel corrosion and spalled concrete; wood blocking has been inserted to aid in supporting the failing entries. 2. Entrance stairs have settled and are separating from building 3. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 4. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service is located in stairwell and does not comply with current code c. Elevator cabs, shafts and equipment rooms do not meet code 2. Light and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code (2x4 fluorescent) 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stairs not code compliant do to rise -run being outside code parameters b. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) Page 1 of 3 c. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes and wall mounted electrical equipment. d. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms e. Interior carpet is significantly worn, appears to be 20 -30 years old and requires replacement f. Vinyl wall coverings are worn and need to be replaced g. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations h. Building is primarily vacant and'finishes are generally worn and dated Exterior Construction a. Front of building not Accessible -ADA entry at rear of building; handicap operators not functioning; this entry is not at primary faeade. b. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated c. There are no handicapped parking spaces d. Sidewalks adjacent to the buildings have slumped or sunken e. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying f. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall g. There is water infiltration in link structures that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells h. Area well stairs not code compliant i. Area well block walls have step cracks j. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected, lifecycle. k. Roof structural capacity needs ,to be evaluated to verify if it can carry the existing Mechanical equipment loads imposed. 1: Mechanical equipment on roof is inadequately supported in several locations m. Metal cladding wrapping exterior columns is corroded at the bases. Environmental The following Environmental reports were made available by the Owner: a. Environmental Evaluation, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July .18, 2012. i. The report detected petroleum and non - petroleum contamination and recommended that the Site (4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street) be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP) and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program. b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. c. Asbestos and Lead - Based -Paint Assessment Report, Pentagon Park istar 4530 -4660 West 77`h Street, Edina, MN Braun Intertec Corporation September 20, 2012. L The report confirmed the presence of Friable Asbestos Containing. Material (ACM), Category I Non - Friable ACM, and Category lI Non - Friable ACM. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart l ,requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." ii. The report confirmed the presence of loose and flaking lead- based -paint in subject buildings and associated garage. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." Page 2 of 3 Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (4600, 4620, 4640, and 4660) are nearly identical in size, configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape and arranged so that they form an open sided square set back, off West 77h with parking in the interior. All buildings have main, entrances on the south (interior) side which are not Accessible. There are Accessible entrances on the rear (north) that are in various states of usability.. In general the buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Additionally, the buildings have undergone inspections for hazardous materials and it was determined that both lead based paint and asbestos containing materials are present in the buildings. Of note, the Owner of the complex is undertaking a partial renovation of an adjacent, similar building and has found that the City of Edina has required compliance with the current energy code related to wall assembly, however, this study'will not consider energy code within the code deficiencies calculation. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies I. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution a. Remove and replace existing combustible materials in plenum 2. Move electrical service out of stairwell and upgrade to capacity required by HVAC 3. Provide new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 4. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room 5. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 6.. Provide code compliant hand rails and guards 7. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — l . set per floor 8. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 9. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID 3b 4640 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 3 of 3 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID 4b 4620 77'h Street West Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - ..Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found: Estimated Replacement Cost: Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: Percentage of Replacement Cost: $8,109,288.00 $3,164,841.06 39% Description.of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 1�0, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in. essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress „,layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient'fotal significance to justify substantial. renovation or clearance.” A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Building entries are severely deteriorated with.structural steel corrosion and spalled concrete; wood blocking has been inserted to aid in supporting the failing entries. 2. Entrance stairs have settled and are separating from building — most significantly at building 4620 3. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 4. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. , Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service is located in stairwell and does not comply with current code c. Elevator cabs, shafts, and equipment rooms do not meet code 2. Licht and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials. b. Building insulation is inadequate <: c. No vapor barrier present d.. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) b. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes and wall mounted electrical equipment. Page 1 of 3 c. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms d. Third floor has been gutted to concrete walls, ceilings and floors and left unrepaired —entire floor requires build -out and finishing e. Remaining carpet in building is significantly worn and needs replacement f. Vinyl wall covering is worn'and requires replacement g. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations Exterior Construction a. Front of building not Accessible -ADA eritry at rear of building; handicap operators not functioning; this entry is not at`primary facade. b. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated ,c. There are no handicapped parking spaces d. Sidewalks adjacent to the buildings have slumped or sunken e. Site landscaping is primarily dead or „dying f. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall g. There is water infiltration in link structures that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells h. Area well stairs not code compliant i. Area well block walls have step cracks j. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. k. Roof structural capacity needs to be . evaluated to verify if it can carry the existing Mechanical equipment loads imposed. 1. Mechanical equipment on roof is inadequately supported in several locations m. Metal cladding wrapping exterior columns is corroded at the bases. Parking Garage at (4530 address only a. Underground parking garage has significant water intrusion in many areas b. 20% of concrete planks require replacement c. Waterproofing requires replacement d. Sections of garage are shored up due to structural failure e. Parking restrictions were recommended by PE — f. Parking garage severely deficient and recommended for replacement Environmental The following Environmental reports were made available by the Owner: a. Environmental Evaluation, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. i. The report detected petroleum and non - petroleum contamination and recommended that the Site (4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street) be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP) and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program. b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. c. Asbestos and Lead - Based -Paint Assessment Report, Pentagon Park — istar 4530 -4660 West 77`h Street, Edina, MN Braun Intertec Corporation September 20, 2012. i. The report confirmed the presence of Friable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM), Category I Non - Friable ACM, and Category II Non - Friable ACM. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled.” ii. The report confirmed the presence of loose and flaking lead- based -paint in subject buildings and associated garage. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing Page 2 of 3 renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed ,prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a. result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecegsor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (4600, 4620, 4640 and 4660) are nearly identical in size, configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in Shape and arranged so that they form an--open sided square set back off West 77�' with parking in the interior. All buildings have main.entra'Ac'es on the,south ;(interior) side which are not Accessible. There are Accessible entrances on the,rear (north) that are in various`states of usability: In general the buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. In 4620 the third level has been gutted to the concrete walls, ceilings and floors.:Additionally, the buildings have undergone . inspections for hazardous materials and it was determined i1►at`both lead based paint and asbestos containing materials are present in the buildings. Of note, the Owner of the complex is undertaking a partial renovation of an adjacent; similar building and has found that the City of Edina has required compliance with the current energy code'related to wall assembly, however, this study will not consider energy code within the code deficiencies calculation. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1'. Provide new 14-VAC terminal units and distribution a. Remove, and replace existing combustible materials in plenum 2. Move electrical service out of stairwell and upgrade to capacity required by HVAC 3. Provide new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 4. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room 5. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 6. Provide "code compliant hand rails and guards 7. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 8. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 9. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID 4b 4620 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 3 of 3 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID 6 4550 77h Street West Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: Interior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. Estimated Replacement Cost: $8,109,288.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $3,164,841.06 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 39% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors; which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Building entries are severely deteriorated with structural steel corrosion and spalled concrete; wood blocking has been inserted to aid in supporting the failing entries. 2. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 3. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service is located in stairwell and does not comply with current code c. Elevator cabs, shafts and equipment rooms do not meet code Light and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) b. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes and wall mounted electrical equipment. c. Stair rise and run does not comply with code Page 1 of 3 d. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms . e. Carpet is worn and in some location appears water stained f. Millwork is damaged and has missing section requiring replacement g. Low voltage cabling not concealed and needs to be rerouted h. Walls in some tenant areas have broken sheetrock and is unpainted — needs repair i. Acoustical tile ceiling broken or damaged in certain locations and needs replacement 5. Exterior Construction a. Front of building not Accessible -ADA entry at rear of building; handicap operators not functioning; this entry is not at primary fagade. b. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated c. There are.no :handicapped parking spaces d. Sidewalks adjacent to.the buildings have slumped or sunken e. Site landscaping is,primarily dead or dying f. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall g. There is water infiltration in link structures that connect buildings resulting in musty/moldy smells h. Area well stairs not code compliant i. Area well block walls have step cracks j. Roof is-flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. k. Roof structural capacity needs to be evaluated to verify if it can carry the existing Mechanical equipment loads imposed. 1. Mechanical equipment on roof is inadequately supported in several locations m. Metal cladding wrapping exterior columns is corroded at the bases. Environmental The followirig,Environmental reports were made available by the Owner: - a. Environmental Evaluation, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July. 18, 2012. i. The report detected petroleum and non- petroleum contamination and recommended that the Site (4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street) be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP) and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program. b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. c. Asbestos and Lead -Based -Paint Assessment Report, Pentagon Park = istar 4530 -4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN Braun Intertec Corporation September 20, 2012. is The report confirmed the presence of Friable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM), Category I Non - Friable ACM, and Category II Non - Friable ACM. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035,Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." ii. The report confirmed the presence of loose and flaking lead- based -paint in subject buildings and associated garage. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous, materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." Page 2 of 3 Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (4510, 4530, 4550 and 4570) are nearly identical in size, configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape and arranged so that they form an open sided square set back off West 77h with parking in the interior. There is a parking garage that is under the main parking area in front of buildings 4530 and 4550 and is accessed through garage doors at the north side of those buildings. All buildings have main entrances on the south (interior) side which are not Accessible. There are Accessible entrances on the rear (north) that are in various states of usability. All the buildings were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. However, two buildings (45 10 and 4570) were renovated and unlikely to be found substandard so were not investigated further. All the buildings have undergone inspections for, hazardous materials and it was determined that both lead based paint and asbestos containing materials are present in the buildings. Of note, the. Owner of the complex is undertaking a partial renovation of an adjacent, similar building and has found that the City of Edina has required compliance with the current energy code related to wall assembly, however, this study will not consider energy code within the code deficiencies calculation. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution a. Remove and replace existing combustible materials in plenum 2. Move electrical service out of stairwell and upgrade to capacity required by HVAC. 3. Replace stairs — 2 sets 4. Provide new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 5. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room 6. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 7. Provide code compliant hand rails and guards 8. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 9. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 10. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID 6 4550 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 3 of 3 PENTAGON PARK REDEVELOPMENT TIF DISTRICT CODE /CONDITION DEFICIENCY REPORT September 3, 2013 Map No. & Building Name /Address: Map ID 9 4530 77`' Street West Inspection Date(s) & Time(s): 6/18/2013, 6/25/2013 Inspection Type: lnterior/Exterior Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because: - Building Code deficiencies total more than 15% of replacement cost. - Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions found. I. Estimated Replacement Cost: $8,109,288.00 Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $3,164,841.06 Percentage of Replacement Cost: 39% Description of Condition Deficiencies Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, states that a building is Structurally Substandard if it contains, "defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." A. Defects in Structural Elements 1. Building entries are severely deteriorated with structural steel corrosion and spalled concrete; wood blocking has been inserted to aid in supporting the failing entries. 2. Cracking and spalling of top coat on exposed concrete overhangs — significant water intrusion issue 3. Minor water infiltration at roof level concrete ceiling B. Combination of Deficiencies 1. Essential Utilities and Facilities a. Existing HVAC does not comply with current ventilation codes b. Existing electrical service is located in stairwell and does not comply with current code c. Elevator cabs, shafts and equipment rooms do not meet code 2. Light and Ventilation a. Plenum constructed of combustible materials b. Building insulation is inadequate c. No vapor barrier present d. Windows are non - thermally broken single pane aluminum e. Lighting does not meet current energy code 3. Fire Protection/Adequate Egress a. Building not sprinkled b. Corridor walls not rated to qualify hall as adequate egress from building 4. Layout and Condition of Interior Partitions/Materials a. Stair handrails and guards are not code complaint (lack of extension, handrail used as top of guard, non - permissible openings size) b. Stair rise and run not code compliant c. Stair landing sizes are impeded by stand pipes and wall mounted electrical equipment. Page 1 of 3 d. Building does not have ADA compliant restrooms e. Some tenant space walls damaged and not painted requiring build- out and new finishes f. Sump pump in lower level common space indicates water issue g. Cable and wiring exposed hanging from ceiling needs to be re- routed or concealed h. Ceiling tiles missing in some locations L Wall and door finishes scuffed and worn requiring new paint, wallpaper and door finish Exterior Construction a. Front of building not Accessible -ADA entry at rear of building; handicap operators.not functioning; this entry is not at primary fagade. b. Parking area bituminous is significantly deteriorated c. There are no handicapped parking spaces d. Sidewalks adjacent to the buildings have slumped or sunken e. Site landscaping is primarily dead or dying f. Roof drains daylight at building perimeters resulting in water saturating the building wall g. There is water infiltration in link structures that connect buildings resulting in musty /moldy smells h. Area well stairs not code compliant i. Area well block walls have step cracks j. Roof is flat without proper pitch and appears at the end of expected lifecycle. k. Roof structural capacity needs to be evaluated to verify if it can carry the existing Mechanical equipment loads imposed. 1. Mechanical equipment on roof is inadequately supported in several locations m. Metal cladding wrapping exterior columns is corroded at the bases. 6. Parking Garage at (4530 address only) a. Underground parking garage has significant water intrusion in many areas b. 20% of concrete planks require replacement c. Waterproofing requires replacement d. Sections of garage are shored up due to structural failure e. Parking restrictions were recommended by Structural Engineer f. Parking garage severely deficient and recommended for replacement Environmental The, following Environmental reports were made available by the Owner: a. Environmental Evaluation, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. L The report detected petroleum and non - petroleum contamination and recommended that the Site (4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street) be enrolled into the MPCA Petroleum Brownfields Program (PBP) and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program. b. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Commercial Properties 4530, 4540, 4550, 4600, 4620, and 4660 West 77th Street, Edina, MN, Braun Intertec Corporation July 18, 2012. c. Asbestos and Lead - Based -Paint Assessment Report, Pentagon Park — istar 4530 -4660 West 77`b Street, Edina, MN Braun Intertec Corporation September 20, 2012. L The report confirmed the presence of Friable Asbestos Containing Material (ACM), Category I Non - Friable ACM, and Category II Non - Friable ACM. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." ii. The report confirmed the presence of loose and flaking lead -based -paint in subject buildings and associated garage. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minnesota Administrative Rule Chapter 7035 Part 0805 Subpart 1 requires the building owner or person authorizing Page 2 of 3 renovation or demolition of a building ensure that that "hazardous materials or items present in structures are removed prior to the commencement of renovation or demolition and that the hazardous materials or items generated as a result are properly characterized and disposed of or recycled." Overview of Condition Deficiencies Constructed in 1968 -69 by the predecessor firm to Opus Corporation, the buildings in this grouping (4510, 4530, 4550 and 4570) are nearly identical in size, configuration and systems. The buildings are rectilinear in shape and arranged so that they form an open sided square set back off West 77`h with parking in the interior. There is a parking garage that is under the main parking area in front of buildings 4530 and 4550 and is accessed through garage doors at the north side of those buildings. All buildings have main entrances on the south (interior) side which are not Accessible. There are Accessible entrances on the rear (north) that are in various states of usability. The buildings given more in- depth "consideration were found to have significant HVAC, electrical, life safety, and energy code issues that will require remediation if they are to be renovated. Additionally, the buildings have undergone inspections for hazardous materials and it was determined that both lead based paint and asbestos containing materials are present in the buildings. Of note, the Owner of the complex is undertaking a partial renovation of an adjacent; similar building and has found that the City of Edina has required compliance with the current energy code, r :Wed to wall assembly, however, this study will not consider energy code within the code deficiencies calculation. Required Repairs to Mitigate Code Deficiencies 1. Provide new HVAC terminal units and distribution a. Remove and replace existing combustible materials in plenum 2. Move electrical service out of stairwell and upgrade to capacity required by HVAC 3. Provide new elevators and upgrade shafts and lobbies 4. Provide new compliant elevator equipment room 5. Sprinkle building — must provide new water service 6. Provide code compliant hand rails and guards 7. Provide ADA compliant restrooms — 1 set per floor 8. Provide ADA compliant entrances at front of building 9. Provide new roof and mechanical unit mounts M: \13Proj \130270 \400 Design \406 Reports \TIF\Building Reports\Pentagon MAP ID 9 4530 77th st w Redevelopment District Substandard Building Report.doc Page 3 of 3 ( APPENDIX C Building Replacement Cost Reports Code Deficiency Cost Reports Photographs P Square root LOST tsumate n Estimate Name: 1 A 490177th St W, Edina, MN Building Type: Block Back -up / Steel Joists Location: ...MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 2 Story Height (L.F.): 10 Floor Area (S.F.):. 35500 Labor Type: STD Basement Included: No Data Release: Year 2012 Cost Per Square Foot: $ Building Cost: $ Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. 153.38 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. 5,445,132.00 A1010 Standard Foundations $ 2.86 $ 101,530.00 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep KSF, T- 6" square x 25" deep A1030 Slab on Grade $ 2.99 $ 106,145.00 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation $ 0.11 $ 3,905.00 site storage A2020 Basement Walls $ 1.96 $ 69,580.00 thick thick B1010 Floor Construction $ 11.37 $ 403,635.00 wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF B1020 Roof Construction $ 3.80 $ 134,900.00 wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, 82010. Exterior Walls $ 10.89 $ 386,595.00 thick, perlite core fill B2020 Exterior Windows $ 2.48 $ 88,040.00 Windows, aluminum, awning, insulated glass, 4' -5" x 5' -3" 82030 Exterior Doors $ 1.15 $ 40,825.00 hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening 10' -0" opening 7' -0" opening 83010 Roof Coverings $ 3.62 $ 128,510.00 mopped D3030 Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite $ 12.83 $ 455,465.00 group,125 FPM Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" $ 142,000.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4" Auranodic, .050" thick Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" C3030 Partition's $ 3.42 $ 121,410.00 OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH 1/2" fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished,.painted on metal furring D2020 Domestic Water Distribution C1020 Interior Doors $ 6.23 $ 221,165.00 3' -0" x 7' -0" x 1 -3/8" D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.69 C1030 Fittings $ 1.13 $ 40,115.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate D3050 C2010 Stair Construction $ 4.97 $ 176,435.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing' D4010 Sprinklers $ 03030 Wall Finishes $ 1.38 $ ' 48,990.00 primer & 2 coats 5000 SF Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight D4020 C3020 Floor Finishes $ 8.65 $ 307,075.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz additional floors Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.10 $ 287,550.00 channel grid, suspended support D3030 Elevators and Lifts $ 12.83 $ 455,465.00 group,125 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.00 $ 142,000.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.46 $ 16,330.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.69 $ 24,495.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 18.48 $ 656,040.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.27 $ 151,585.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 5000 SF 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 35,500.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor additional floors 1 135010 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 2.80 $ 99,400.00 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1000 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A A D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring- $ 13.07 $ 463,985.00 with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D503.0 Communications and Security $ 6.48 $ 230,040.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8 jacks /MSF detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire. Fire alarm command center, addressable with-voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. 135090 Other Electrical Systems $ 0.25 $ 8,875.00 gas /gasoline operated, 3.phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 7.5 kW kW E Equipment & Furnishings �� •® SubTotal 100% $ 139.44 $ 4,950,120.W Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) 10.00% $ 13.94 $ 495,012.00 Architectural Fees $ - $ - User -Fees - �� Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 MAP ID No. 1 A Address 4901 77th Street West Edina, MN PID 31 -028 -24 -33 -0010 Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each gender Build (4) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 11,500.00 Lump 1 $ 11,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 10 $ 25,000.00 lays $ 1,750.00 each 8 $ 14,000.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 4 $ 7,000.00 4 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 each 4 $ 1,600.00 4 sets toilet room accessories $ 8100.00 each 4 $ 3,200.00 4 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 960 $ 57,600.00 4 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 4 $ 6,400.00 Exiting Replace guards and handrails in stair $ 6,500.00 Lump 1 $ 6,500.00 Fire Protection Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 4.27 SF 35,500 $ 151,585.00 Install standpipes $ 1.00 SF 35,500 $ 35,500.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.25 SF 17,700 $ 39,825.00 Conveyance Provide elevator $ 12.83 SF 35,500 $ 455,465.00 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system - includes plenum $ 18.00 SF 35,500 $ 639,000.00 reconstruction Provide new electrical service $ 2.80 SF 35,500 $ 99,400.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 6.05 SF 54,000 $ 326,700.00 Total Code Improvements $ 1,880,275.00 Page 1 of 1 i bquare roof LOSS tsLlmare.11 Estimate Name: 1 B 4900 77th St W , Edina, MN Building Type: Block Back -up /Steel Joists Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 2 Story Height (L.F.): 30 Floor Area (S.F.): 35500 Labor Type: STD Basement Included: No Data Release: Year 2012 Cost Per Square Foot: $ 153.38 Building Cost: $ 5,445,132.00 a. are derived from a building model with basic components. differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. A3030 Standard Foundations $ 2.86 $ 101,530.00 ,KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep KSF, T- 6" square x 25" deep A1030 Slab on Grade $ 2.99 $ 106,145.00 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrials reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation $ 0.11 $ 3,905.00 site storage A2020 Basement Walls $ 1.96 $ 69,580.00 thick thick B1010, Floor Construction $ 11.37 $ 403,635.00 wall, 25'x25' bay,,26" deep, 15 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF B1020 Roof Construction $ 3.80 $ 134,900.00 wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, B2010 Exterior Walls $ 10.89 $ 386,595.00 thick, perlite core fill 82020 Exterior Windows $ 2.48 $ 88,040.00 Windows, aluminum, awning, insulated glass, 4' -5" x 5' -3" 82030 Exterior Doors $ 1.15 $ 40,825.00 hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening 10' -0" opening 7' -0" opening 83010 Roof Coverings $ 3.62 $ 128,510.00 mopped M Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Gravel stop, aluminum,.extruded, 4 ", duranodic, .050" thick 'C Interiors C3030 Partitions $ 3.42 $ 121,410.00 OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation 1/2'.' fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring .. C1020 Interior Doors ?' $ 6.23 $ 221,165.00 3' -0" x 7'-O" ,x 1 -3/8" C10301 Fittings $ 1.13 $ 40,115.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate C2010 Stair Construction $ 4.97 $ 176,435.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.38 $ 48,990.00 primer & 2 coats Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor.Finishes $ 8.65 $ 307,075.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet,,padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.10 $ 287,550.00 channel grid, suspended support D Services D1010` Elevators and Lifts $ 12.83 $ 455,465.00 group,125 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.00 $ 142,000.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.46 $ 16,330.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.69 $ 24,495.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high .Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 18.48 $ 656,040.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.27 $ 151,585.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 5000 SF 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 35,500.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor additional floors 0 135010 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 2.80 $ 99,400.00 phase, 4 wire,. 120 /208 V, 1000 A Feeder: installation 600 V; including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A A D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $ 13.07 .$ 463,985.00 with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size fixtures @32watt per 1000 5F D5030 Communications and Security $ 6.48 $ 230,040.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8 jacks /MSF detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm command center, addressable.with voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other. Electrical Systems,.. $ 0.25 $ 8,875.00 gas /gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 75AW kW E Equipment & Furnishings SubTotal 100% $ 139.44 $ 4,950,120.00 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) 10.00% $ 13.94 $ 495,012.00 Architectural Fees $ - $ - User Fees $ - $ Total Building Cost �� Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 MAP ID No. 1 B Address 4900 77th Street West Edina, MN PID 31 -028 -24 -33 -0010 $ 6,500.00 Lump 1 $ 6,500.00 Roof Construction Unit Code Related Cost Items $ Unit Cost Units Quantity $ Total Accessibility Items Replace toilets to provide handicap.access for each gender $ 12.83 sf 35,500 $ 455,465.00 Build (4) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 11,500.00 Lump 1 $ 11,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 10 $ 25,000.00 lays $ 1,750.00 each 8 $ 14,000.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 4 $ 7,000.00 4 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 each 4 $ 1,600.00 4 sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 each 4 $ 3,200.00 4 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 960 $ 57,600.00 4 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 4 $ 6,400.00 Exiting Replace guards and handrails in stair $ 6,500.00 Lump 1 $ 6,500.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.25 SF 17,700 $ 39,825.00 Conveyance Provide elevator $ 12.83 sf 35,500 $ 455,465.00 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system - includes plenum $ 18.00 SF 35,500 $ 639,000.00 reconstruction Provide new electrical service $ 2.80 SF 35,500 $ 99,400.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 6.05 SF 54,000 $ 326,700.00 Total Code Improvements $ 1,693,190.00 Page 1 of 1 J square root Lost rstimate Ke Estimate Name: 1 C $ 4940 Viking Drive, Edina, MN $ 232,691.20 Office, 5 -10 Story with Precas Building Type: R /Conc. Frame Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: .7 Story Height (L.F.): 30 Floor Area (S.F.): 87,808 Labor Type: STD Basement Included: No Data Release: Year 2012 Cost Per Square Foot: $ Building Cost: $ Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. 158.08 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. 13,884,000.00 A1010 Standard Foundations $ 2.65 $ 232,691.20 KSF, 12" deep x 32" wide 9'- 6" square x 30" deep A1030 Slab on Grade $ 0.85 $ 74,636.80 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation $ 0.60 $ 52,684.80 site storage A2020 Basement Walls $ 1.60 $ 140,492.80 thick 83030 Floor Construction $ 24.72 $ 2,170,613.76 height, 394 Ibs /LF, 4000PSI height, 394 Ibs /LF, 6000PSI height, 394 Ibs /LF, 6000PSI 500K load, 10' -14' story height, 375 Ibs /LF, 4000PSI 15'x15' bay, 75 PSF superimposed load, 153 PSF total load superimposed load, 188 PSF total load 81020 Roof Construction $ 2.45 $ 215,129.60 18" deep beam, 8.5" slab, 146 PSF total load B2010 Exterior Walls $ 14.84 $ 1,303,070.72 2" rigid insulation, high rise B2020 Exterior Windows $ 3.11 $ 273,082.88 Windows, aluminum, sliding, insulated glass, 5'x 3' 82030 Exterior Doors $ 0.29 $ 25,464.32 hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening . 0" opening B3010 Roof Coverings $ 0.97 $ 85,173.76 mopped Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS, 1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" C Interiors 200 FPM lie ' C1030 Partitions $ 3.27 $ 287,132.16 5/8" @ 24" OCframing,same opposite face, no insulation Urinal, vitreous china, Wall hung 1/2" fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring C1020 Interior Doors $ 3.11 $ 273,082.88 3' -0" x 7-0" x 1 -3/8" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH C1030 Fittings $ 0.75 $ 65,856.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 200 MBH input, 192 GPH Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate D2040 Rain Water Drainage C2010 Stair Construction $ 3.02 $ 265,180.16 Stairs, steel; cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing D3050 C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.16 $ 101,857.28 primer & 2 coats Sprinklers $ 3.40 $ 298,547.20 Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor Finishes $ 8.65 $ 759,539.20 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Standpipes $ 1.08 $ 94,832.64 Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum floors Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Fire pump, electric, with controller, 5" pump, 100 HP, 1000 GPM Tile, ceramic natural clay Fire pump, electric, forjockey pump system, add C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.09 $ 710,366.72 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1600 A channel grid, suspended support Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 60 A D1010 Elevators and Lifts $ 15.86 $ 1,392,634.88 200 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 2.81 $ 246,740.48 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, Wall hung Lavatory W /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w %trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung,.8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.56 $ 49,172.48 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 200 MBH input, 192 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.30 $ 26,342.40 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 5" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 5" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 18.48 $ 1,622,691.84 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 3.40 $ 298,547.20 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 10,000 SF 10,000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 8 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.08 $ 94,832.64 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor floors Fire pump, electric, with controller, 5" pump, 100 HP, 1000 GPM - Fire pump, electric, forjockey pump system, add 135030 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 1.94 $ 170,347.52 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1600 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 60 A 'feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 200 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1600 A Switchgear installation, incl,switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, 1600 A D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $ 13.07 $ 1,147,650.56 with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size V 15 HP, 575 V 20 HP Motor connections, three phase, 200/230/460/575 V, up to 5 HP Motor connections, three phase, 200/230/460/575 V, up to 100 HP fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D5030 Communications and Security $ 4.90 $ 430,259.20 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8jacks /MSF detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F... D5090 Other Electrical Systems $ 1.18 $ 103,613.44 engine with fuel tank, 100 kW kW E Equipment & Furnishings E1090 Other Equipment SubTotal 91% $ 143.71 $ 12,618,887.68 Contractor Fees (General Conditions, Overhead, Profit) 9:09% $ 14.37 $ 1,261,888.77 Architectural Fees 0.00% $ - $ - User Fees 0.00% $ $ Total Building Cost n Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 Map No 1 C Address 4940 Viking Drive Edina, MN PID 31- 028 -24 -33 -0010 Code Related Cost Items Code Deficiency Cost Report Unit Cost Accessibility Items $ 15.86 Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each gender 87,808 $ 1,392,634.88 Build (14) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 65,000.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 lays $ 1,750.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 14 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 14 sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 14 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 14 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 Fire Protection 87,808 $ 1,147,650.56 Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 3.40 Install standpipes $ 1.08 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.25 Conveyance Units Lump each each each each each SF each SF SF SF Unit Quantity Total 1 $ 65,000.00 35 $ 87,500.00 28 $ 49,000.00 14 $ 24,500.00 14 $ 5,600.00 14 $ 11,200.00 3,150 $ 189,000.00 .14 $ 22,400.00 87,808 $ 298,547.20 87,808 $ 94,832.64 12,544 $ 28,224.00 Replace 2 elevators, shafts and equipment room $ 15.86 SF 87,808 $ 1,392,634.88 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system $ 18.00 SF 87,808 $ 1,580,544.00 Provide new electrical service $ 150,000.00 Lump 1 $ 100,000.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 13.07 SF 87,808 $ 1,147,650.56 Total Code Improvements $ 5,096,633.28 Page 1 of 1 Floor, concrete, slab form, open'web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load, for columns add Fireproofing, gypsum board, fire rated, 2 layer, 1" thick, 14" steel column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF B1020 Roof Construction $ Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns and bearing 4.00 $ 105,600.00 r square root cost estimate Keport ,A Substructure Estimate Name: 1 D ,• „ A1010 4960 Viking Drive, Edina, MN $ 74;976.00 Office, 2-4 Story with Face Brick with Concrete Strip footing; concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing Building Type: Block Back -up / Steel Joists I �_. I Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 2 Story Height (L.F.): Floor Area (S.F.): 26,400 im Labor Type: STD — Basement Included: No Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 300K, soil bearing capacity 6 Data Release: f1 Yea_ r 2013 Quarter 3 Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Cost Per Square Foot: $ is8.05 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. Building Cost: $ 4,172,467.20 $ Floor, concrete, slab form, open'web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load, for columns add Fireproofing, gypsum board, fire rated, 2 layer, 1" thick, 14" steel column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF B1020 Roof Construction $ Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns and bearing 4.00 $ 105,600.00 r %of Total ost .0 P r F i tCosts' ,A Substructure ®® ,• „ A1010 Standard Foundations $ 2.84 $ 74;976.00 Strip footing; concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 200K, soil bearing capacity 6. KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 300K, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 7'- 6" square x 25" deep A1030 Slab on Grade $ 2.97 $ 78,408.00 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation $ 0.11 $ 2,904.00 Excavate and fill, 30,000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth, on site storage A2020 Basement Walls $ 1.99 $ . 52,536.00 Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .099 CY /LF, 4.8 PLF, 8" thick Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY /LF, 7.2 PLF, 12" thick 83030 Floor Construction $ 11.69 $ 308,616.00 Floor, concrete, slab form, open'web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load, for columns add Fireproofing, gypsum board, fire rated, 2 layer, 1" thick, 14" steel column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF B1020 Roof Construction $ Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns and bearing 4.00 $ 105,600.00 r wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns and bearing wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, add for column B2010 Exterior Walls $ 11.67 $ 308,088.00 Brick wall,,composite double wythe, standard face /CMU back -up, 8" thick, perlite core fill B2020 Exterior Windows $ 2.67 $ 70,488.00 Windows, aluminum, awning, insulated glass, 4' -5" x 5' -3" B2030 Exterior Doors $ 1.17 $ 30,888.00 Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, narrow stile, double door, hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening .- Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, bronze finish, hardware, 3' -0" x 10' -0" opening Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal,1 door with frame, no label, 3' -0" x 7' -0" opening 83030 Roof Coverings $ 3.73 $ 98,472.00 Roofing, asphalt flood coat, gravel, base sheet, 3 plies 15# asphalt felt, mopped Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS,1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4 ", duranodic, .050" thick C3010 Partitions $ 3.62 $ 95,568.00 Metal partition, 5/8 "fire rated gypsum board face, no base,3 -5/8" @ 24" OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation 1/2" fire rated gypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring C1020 Interior Doors $ 6.57 $ 173,448.00 Door, single leaf, kd steel frame, hollow metal, commercial quality, flush, 3' -0" x 7' -0" x 1 -3/8" C1030 Fittings $ 1.19 $ 31,416.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate C2010 Stair Construction $ 5.34 $ 140,976.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.38 $ 36,432.00 Painting, interior on plaster and drywall, walls & ceilings, roller work, primer & 2 coats Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor Finishes $ 9.11 $ 240,504.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.28 $ 218,592.00 Acoustic ceilings, 3/4 "mineral fiber, 12" x 12" tile, concealed 2" bar & channel grid, suspended support Rain Water Drainage $; 0.74 $ 19,536.00 131030 Elevators and Lifts $ 12.48 $ 329,472.00 Hydraulic passenger elevator, 3000 lb, 3 floors,l2' story height, 2 car Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add group,125 FPM D3050 D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.26 $ 112,464.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung D4010 Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" $ 4.17 $ 110,088.00 Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard,1 floor, 5000 SF Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.49 $ 12,936.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $; 0.74 $ 19,536.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal`& Package Units $ 19.55 $ 516,120.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.17 $ 110,088.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard,1 floor, 5000 SF Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, each additional floor, 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 26,400.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black,'sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, additional floors D5010 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 3.12 $ 82,368.00 Service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20' conduit &.wire, 3 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1000 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A Switchgearinstallation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, 120/208 V, 1200 A D5020 _ Lighting and Branch Wiring $ 12.77 $ 337,128.00 Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 16.5 per 1000 SF, 2.0 W per SF, with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V,15 HP motor size Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling,,1.6 watt per SF, 40 FC, 10 fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D5030 Communications and Security $ 6.50 $ 171,600.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8 jacks /MSF Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 50 detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems $ 0.27 $ 7,128.00 Generator sets, w /battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch, gas /gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 7.5 kW Uninterruptible power supply with standard battery pack, 15 kVA /12.75 kW SubTotal .91% $ 143.68 $ 3,793,152.00 Contractor Fees (General Conditions;Overhead,Profit) 9% $ 14.37 $ 379,315.20 Architectural Fees 0% $ - $ - User Fees . 0% $ - $ - Total Building Cost Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 Map No 1 D, Address 4960 Viking Drive Edina, MN PID 31- 028 -24 -33 -0010 Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each gender Build:(2) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 6,500.00 Lump 1 $ 6,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 3 $ 7,500.00 lays $ 1,750:00 each 4 $ 7,000.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 2 $ 3,500.00 2'sets of grab bars $ 400,00 ;' each 2 $ 800.00 2'sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 each 2 $ 1,600.00 2 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 480 $ 28,800.00 2 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 2 $ 3,200.00 Fire Protection Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 3.40 SF 26,400 $ 89,760.00 Install standpipes $ 1.08 SF 26,400 $ 28,512.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.25 SF 13,200 $ 29,700.00 Conveyance Install 1 elevator! $ 12.48 SF 26,400 $ 329,472.00 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system $ 19.55 SF 26,400 $ 516,120.00 Provide new electrical service $ 100,000.00 Lump 1 1 $ 100,000.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 12.77 SF 26,400 $ 337,128.00 Total Code Improvements $ 1,489,592.00 Page 1 of 1 Ire derived from a building model with basic components. differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. A1010 _Nquare root post estimate nepor[ Estimate Name: 1 E 7701 Normandale Drive, Edina, MN Office, 2-4 Story with Face Brick with Concrete Building Type: Block Back -up / Steel Joists Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 2 Story Height (L.F.): 10 Floor Area (S.F.): 26,400 LaborType: STD Basement Included: No Data Release: Year 2013 Quarter 3 Cost Per Square Foot: $ 158.05 Building Cost: $ 4,172,467.20 Ire derived from a building model with basic components. differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. A1010 Standard Foundations Strip footing, concrete, reinforced, load 11.1 KLF, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide Spread footings, 3000 PSI concrete, load 200K, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep Spread footings, 3000 PSI: concrete, load 300K, soil bearing capacity 6 KSF, 7'- 6" square x 25" deep A1030 Slab on Grade Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation Excavate and fill, 30,000 SF, 4' deep, sand, gravel, or common earth, on site storage A2020 Basement Walls Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .099 CY /LF, 4.8 PLF, 8" thick Foundation wall, CIP, 4' wall height, direct chute, .148 CY /LF, 7.2 PLF, 12" thick 131010 Floor Construction Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load Floor, concrete, slab form, open web bar joist @ 2' OC, on W beam and wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total load, for columns add Fireproofing, gypsum board, fire rated, 2 layer, 1" thick, 14" steel column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF 81020 Roof Construction Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on columns and bearing $ 2.84 $ 74,976.00 $ 2.97 $ 78,408.00 $ 0.11 $ 2,904.00 $ 1.99 $ 52,536.00 $ 11.69 $ 308,616.00 $ 4.00 $ 105,600.00 3 wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load Roof, steel joists, beams, 1.5" 22 ga metal deck, on colurnns and bearing wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, add for column B2010 Exterior Walls $ 11.67 $ 308,088.00 - Brick' wal1, composite double wythe, standard face /CMU back -up, 8" thick, perlite core fill B2020 Exterior Windows $ 2.67 $ '70,488.00 Windows;' aluminum, awning, insulated glass, 4' -5" x 5' -3" 82030 Exterior Doors $ 1.17 $ 30,888.00 Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, narrow stile, double door, hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening Door, aluminum & glass, with transom, bronze finish, hardware, 3' -0" x 10' -0" opening Door, steel 18 gauge, hollow metal,1 door with frame, no label, 3' -0" x T -0 ". opening B3010 Roof Coverings $ 3.73 $ 98,472.00 Roofing, asphalt flood coat, gravel, base sheet, 3 plies 15# asphalt felt, mopped Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite.with 2" EPS, 1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Gravel.stop, aluminum, extruded, 4 ", duranodic, .050" thick C3010 Partitions $ 3.62 $ 95,568.00 Metal partition, 5/8 "fire rated gypsum board face, no base,3 -5/8" @ 24" OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation 1/2" fire rated gypsum board, taped &finished, painted on metal furring C1020 Interior Doors $ 6.57 $ 173,448.00 Door, single leaf, kd steel frame, hollow metal, commercial quality, flush, 3' -0" x 7' -0" x 1 -3/8" C1030 Fittings $ 1.19 $ 31,416.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate C2010 Stair Construction $ 5.34 $ 140,976.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.38 $ 36,432.00 Painting, interior on plaster and drywall, walls & ceilings, roller work, primer & 2 coats Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor Finishes $ 9.11 $ . 240,504.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.28 $ 218,592.00 Acoustic ceilings, 3/4 "mineral fiber, 12" x 12" tile, concealed 2" bar & channel grid, suspended support D1010 Elevators and Lifts $ 12.48 $ 329,472.00 Hydraulic. passenger elevator, 3000 lb, 3 floors,12' story height, 2 car group,125 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.26 $ 112,464.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.49 $ 12,936.00 Gas fired water heater; commercial, 100< F. rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.74 $ 19,536.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 19.55 $ 516,120.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.17 $ 110,088.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 5000 SF Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, each additional floor, 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 26,400.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel; black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, additional floors D5030 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 3.12 $ 82,368.00 Service installation, includes breakers, metering, 20' conduit & wire, 3 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1000 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A Switchgear installation, incl switchboard, panels & circuit breaker, 120/208 V, 1200 A D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $ 12.77 $ 337,128.00 Receptacles incl plate, box, conduit, wire, 16.5 per 1000 SF, 2.0 W per SF, with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size Fluorescent fixtures recess mounted in ceiling, 1.6 watt per SF, 40 FC, 10 fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D5030 Communications and Security $ 6.50 $ 171,600.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8 jacks /MSF Communication and alarm systems, fire detection, addressable, 50 detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire &conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems $ 0.27 $ 7,128.00 Generator sets, w /battery, charger, muffler and transfer switch, gas /gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V, 7.5 kW Uninterruptible power supply with standard battery pack, 15 kVA /12.75 kW SubTotal 91% $ 143.68 $ 3,793,152.00 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) _ 9% $ 14.37 $ 379,315.20 Architectural Fees 0% $ - $ - User Fees. 0%.$ Total Building Cost Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 Map No 1 E Address 7701 Normandale Drive Edina, MN PID 31- 028 -24 -33 -0010 Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each gender Build (2) new accessible toilet rooms W1 compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 6,500.00 Lump 1 $ 6,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 3 $ 7,500.00 lays $ 1,750.00 each 4 $ 7,000.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 2 $ 3,500.00 2 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 each 2 $ 800.00 2 sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 each 2 $ 1,600.00 2 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 480 $ 28,800.00 2 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 2 $ 3,200.00 Fire Protection Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 3.40 SF 26,400 $ 89,760.00 Install standpipes $ 1.08 SF 26,400 $ 28,512.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.25 SF 13,200 $ 29,700.00 Conveyance Install 1 elevator $ 12.48 SF 26,400 $ 329,472.00 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system $ 19.55 SF 26,400 $ 516,120.00 Provide new electrical service $ 100,000.00 Lump 1 $ 100,000.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 12.77 SF 26,400 $ 337,128.00 Total Code Improvements $ 1,489,592.00 Page 1 of 1 bquare hOOt Lost tstlmate Report Estimate Name: 6 4.550 77st W, Edina, MN Building Type: Block Back -up / Steel Joists Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 3 Story Height (L.F.): 10 Floor Area (S.F.): 54,000 Labor Type: STD Basement Included: No Data Release: Year 2012 Cost Per Square Foot: $ Building Cost: $ r:. Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. 150.17 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. 8,109,288.00 A1010 Standard Foundations $ . 2.58 $ 139,320.0' KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep KSF, T- 6" square x 25" deep A1030 Slab on Grade $ 1.99 $ 107,460.00 Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced A2010 Basement Excavation $ 0.07 $ 3,780.00 site storage A2020 Basement Walls $ 1.39 $ 75,060.00 thick thick B1010 Floor Construction $ 14.04 $ 758,160.00 wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total wall, 25'x25' bay, 26" deep, 75 PSF superimposed load, 120 PSF total column, 3 hour rating, 22 PLF 81020 Roof Construction $ 2.54 $ 137,160.00 wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load wall, 25'x25' bay, 20" deep, 40 PSF superimposed load, 60 PSF total load, B2010 Exterior Walls $ 10.74 $ 579,960.00 thick, perlite core fill 82020 Exterior Windows $ 2.44 $ 131,760.00 Windows, aluminum, awning, insulated glass, 4' -5" x 5' -3" 82030 Exterior Doors $ 1.15 $ 62,100.00 hardware, 6' -0" x 10' -0" opening 10'-07-opening 7' -0" opening B3010 Roof Coverings $ 2.41 $ 130,140.00 mopped Insulation, rigid, roof deck, composite with 2" EPS,1" perlite Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4 ", duranodic, .050" thick C Interiors ••� �� C1030 Partitions $ 3.41 $ 184,140.00 OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation 1/2" fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring - C1020 Interior Doors $ 6.22 $ 335,880.00 3' -0" x 7' -0" x 1 -3/8" C1030 Fittings $ 1.13 $ 61,020.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate C2010 Stair Construction $ 4.97 $ 268,380.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with' landing C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.39 $ 75,060.00 primer & 2 coats Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor Finishes $ 8.65 $ 467,100.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.09 $ 436,860.00 channel grid, suspended support D3010 Elevators and'Lifts $ 12.83 $ 692,820.00 group,125 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.00 $ 216,000.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung,, Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution $ 0.46 $ 24,840.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.69 $ 37,260.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 18.48 $ 997,920.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.26 $ 230,040.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 5000 SF 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 54,000.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor additional floors D5030 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 1.84 $ 99,360.00 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1000 A 100% Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A 136.52 $ 7,372,080.00 A 10.0, %% D5020 Lighting and Branch Wiring $ 13.01 $ 702,540.00 with transformer 0.0%% Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts - $ - Central air conditioning power, 4 watts 0.0%% Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size - $ - fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D5030 - Communications and Security $ 6.48 $ 349,920.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8'jacks /MSF detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm•command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems $ 0.26 $ 14,040.00 gas' /•gasc ine operated, 3 phase, 4 wire,. 277/480 V, 7.5 kW kW ' Equipment E1090 Other.Equipment SubTotal 100% $ 136.52 $ 7,372,080.00 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,Overhead,Profit) 10.0, %% $ 13.65 $ 737,208.00 Architectural Fees 0.0%% $ - $ - User Fees 0.0%% $ .. - $ - Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 MAP ID No. 6 Address 455077th Street West Edina, MN PID 31 -028 -24 -43 -0001 Unit Code Related Cdst Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items''` Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each sex Build (6) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures Remove existing toilet rooms $ 11,500.00 Lump 1 $ 11,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 18 $ 45,000.00 lays $ 1,750.00 each 17 $ 29,750.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 6 $ 10,500.00 6 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 each 6 $ 2,400.00 6 sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 each 6 $ 4,800.00 6 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 1,440 $ 86,400.00 6 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 6 $ 9,600.00 Exiting New ADA compliant entrance $ 50,000.00 Lump 1 $ 50,000.00 2 sets of non - compliant stairs connecting 3 levels Stair riser exceeds maximum rise of 7" and stair treads less than 11 ". Remove existing steel and concrete stairs. $ 5,000.00 Each 10 $ 50,000.00 Provide new stairs at each location (assume 20 risers /stair) $ 350.00 Riser 840 $ 294,000.00 Provide new railings at each location 50 feet per stair flight $ 50.00 Foot 1000 $ 50,000.00 Provide new stair tread coverings $ 56.00 Riser 1680 $ 94,080.00 Fire Protection Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 4.26 SF 54,000 $ 230,040.00 Install standpipes $ 1.00 SF 54,000 $ 54,000.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.41 SF 21,266 $ 51,251.06 Conveyance Replace Elevator, shaft and equipment room $ 12.83 SF 54,000 $ 692,820.00' Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system - includes plenum $ 18.00 SF 54,000 $ 972,000.00 reconstruction Relocate and provide new electrical service $ 100,000.00 Lump 1 $ 100,000.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 6.05 SF 54,000 $ 326,700.00 Total Code Improvements $ 3,164,841.06 Page 1 of 1 a Data Release: Year 2012 Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Cost Per Square Foot: $ 150.17 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. Building Cost: $ 8,109,288.00 A1010 A1030 A2010 A2020 % of Total Cost Per S.F. Cost Standard Foundations $ 2.58 $ 139,320.00 1.99 $ 107,460.00 0.07 $ 3,780.00 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep KSF, 7'- 6" square x 25" deep Slab on Grade $ Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced Basement Excavation $ site storage Basement Walls $ 1.39 $ 75,060.00 thick thick 81030 F Square Foot Cost Estimate Report Estimate Name: 9 4530 77st W, Edina, MN Office, 2-4 Story with Face Brick with Concrete Building Type: Block Back-up/ Steel Joists Location: MINNEAPOLIS, MN Story Count: 3 Story Height (L.F.): 10 Floor Area (S.F.): 54,000 Labor Type: STD Basement Included: No a Data Release: Year 2012 Costs are derived from a building model with basic components. Cost Per Square Foot: $ 150.17 Scope differences and market conditions can cause costs to vary significantly. Building Cost: $ 8,109,288.00 A1010 A1030 A2010 A2020 % of Total Cost Per S.F. Cost Standard Foundations $ 2.58 $ 139,320.00 1.99 $ 107,460.00 0.07 $ 3,780.00 KSF, 12" deep x 24" wide KSF, 6'- 0" square x 20" deep KSF, 7'- 6" square x 25" deep Slab on Grade $ Slab on grade, 4" thick, non industrial, reinforced Basement Excavation $ site storage Basement Walls $ 1.39 $ 75,060.00 thick thick 81030 F Floor Construction $ 1 $ $ 10.74 $ 579,960.00 2.44 $ 131,760.00 1.15 $ 62,100.00 2.41 $ 130,140.00 Roof edges, aluminum, duranodic, .050" thick, 6" face Flashing, aluminum, no backing sides, .019" Gravel stop, aluminum, extruded, 4 ", duranodic, .050" thick �C Interiors C3010 Partitions $ 3.41 $ 184,140.00 OC framing, same opposite face, no insulation 1/2" fire ratedgypsum board, taped & finished, painted on metal furring C1020 Interior Doors $ 6.22 $ 335,880.00 T-O" x 7' -0" x 1 -3/8" C1030 Fittings $ 1.13 $ 61,020.00 Toilet partitions, cubicles, ceiling hung, plastic laminate C2010 Stair Construction $ 4.97 $ 268,380.00 Stairs, steel, cement filled metal pan & picket rail, 16 risers, with landing C3010 Wall Finishes $ 1.39 $ 75,060.00 primer & 2 coats Vinyl wall covering, fabric back, medium weight C3020 Floor Finishes $ 8.65 $ 467,100.00 Carpet, tufted, nylon, roll goods, 12' wide, 36 oz Carpet, padding, add to above, minimum Vinyl, composition tile, maximum .Tile, ceramic natural clay C3030 Ceiling Finishes $ 8.09 $ 436,860.00 channel grid, suspended support D1610 Elevators and Lifts $ 12.83 $ 692,820.00 group,125 FPM D2010 Plumbing Fixtures $ 4.00 $ 216,000.00 Water closet, vitreous china, bowl only with flush valve, wall hung Urinal, vitreous china, wall hung Lavatory w /trim, vanity top, PE on Cl, 20" x 18" Service sink w /trim, PE on Cl,wall hung w /rim guard, 24" x 20" :Water cooler, electric, wall hung, 8.2 GPH Water cooler, electric, wall hung, wheelchair type, 7.5 GPH D2020 Domestic Water Distribution ' $ 0.46 $ 24,840.00 Gas fired water heater, commercial, 100< F rise, 100 MBH input, 91 GPH D2040 Rain Water Drainage $ 0.69 $ 37,260.00 Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, 10' high Roof drain, Cl, soil,single hub, 4" diam, for each additional foot add D3050 Terminal & Package Units $ 18.48 $ 997,920.00 Rooftop, multizone, air conditioner, offices, 25,000 SF, 79.16 ton D4010 Sprinklers $ 4.26 $ 230,040.00 Wet pipe sprinkler systems, steel, light hazard, 1 floor, 5000 SF 5000 SF Standard High Rise Accessory Package 3 story D4020 Standpipes $ 1.00 $ 54,000.00 Wet standpipe risers, class III, steel, black, sch 40, 4" diam pipe, 1 floor additional floors D5010 Electrical Service /Distribution $ 1.84 $ 99,360.00 phase, 4 wire, 120/208 V, 1000 A Feeder installation 600 V, including RGS conduit and XHHW wire, 1000 A A D5020 fighting and Branch Wiring $ 13.01 $ 702,540.00 with transformer Miscellaneous power, 1.2 watts Central air conditioning,power, 4 watts Motor installation, three phase, 460 V, 15 HP motor size fixtures @32watt per 1000 SF D5030. Communications and Security $ 6.48 $ 349,920.00 Telephone wiring for offices & laboratories, 8 jacks /MSF detectors, includes outlets, boxes, conduit and wire Fire alarm command center, addressable with voice, excl. wire & conduit Internet wiring, 8 data /voice outlets per 1000 S.F. D5090 Other Electrical Systems $ 0.26 $ 14,040.00 gas /gasoline operated, 3 phase, 4 wire, 277/480 V,75 kW kW E Equipment & Furnishings- E1090 Other-Equipment $ F Special Construction G Building Sitework �® SubTotal 100% $ 136.52 $ 7,372,080.00 Contractor Fees (General Conditions,overhead,Profit) 10.0%% $ 13.65 ,$ 737,208.00 Architectural Fees 0.0%% $ - $ - User Fees 0S.'0%% $ - $ - Total Building Cost r• �� Code Deficiency Cost Report Pentagon Park Proposed TIF District Project No. 130270 MAP ID No. 9 Address 4530 77th Street West Edina, MN PID 31- 028 -24 -43 -0004 $ 12.83 SF 54,000 $ 692,820.00 Mechanical- Electrical Unit Code Related Cost Items Unit Cost Units Quantity Total Accessibility Items $ 18.00 SF 54,000 $ 972,000.00 Replace toilets to provide handicap access for each sex Build (6) new accessible toilet rooms W/ compliant number of accessories and fixtures $ 100,000.00 Lump Remove existing toilet rooms $ 11,500.00 Lump 1 $ 11,500.00 water closets $ 2,500.00 each 18 $ 45,000.00 lays $ 1,750.00 each 17 $ 29,750.00 Urinal $ 1,750.00 each 6 $ 10,500.00 6 sets of grab bars $ 400.00 each 6 $ 2,400.00 6 sets toilet room accessories $ 800.00 each 6 $ 4,800.00 6 Interior room reconstruction (doors, partitions, finishes) $ 60.00 SF 1,440 $ 86,400.00 6 Reinstall toilet Room Ventilation System $ 1,600.00 each 6 $ 9,600.00 Exiting New ADA compliant entrance $ 50,000.00 Lump 1 $ 50,000.00 2 sets of non - compliant stairs connecting 3 levels Stair riser exceeds maximum rise of 7" and stair treads less than 11 ". Remove existing steel and concrete stairs. $ 5,000.00 Each 10 $ 50,000.00 Provide new stairs at each location (assume 20 risers /stair) $ 350.00 Riser 840 $ 294,000.00 Provide new railings at each location 50 feet per stair flight $ 50.00 Foot 1000 $ 50,000.00 Provide new stair tread coverings $ 56.00 Riser 1680 $ 94,080.00 Fire Protection Install sprinkler system Sprinkler piping and heads for building $ 4.26 SF 54,000 $ 230,040.00 Install standpipes $ 1.00 SF 54,000 $ 54,000.00 Roof Construction Replace roof - install tapered insulation $ 2.41 SF 21,266 $ 51,251.06 Conveyance Replace Elevator, shaft and equipment room $ 12.83 SF 54,000 $ 692,820.00 Mechanical- Electrical Provide new HVAC system New heating, cooling and ventilation system - includes plenum $ 18.00 SF 54,000 $ 972,000.00 reconstruction Relocate and provide new electrical service $ 100,000.00 Lump 1 $ 100,000.00 Provide new branch wiring and lighting system $ 6.05 SF 54,000 $ 326,700.00 Total Code Improvements $ 3,164,841.06 Page 1 of 1 TrTT ;I ill 4 --• -- 4830 front entry.jpg wilding corner panel detail.jpc AWK DSC09219.JPG DSC09220.JPG O� building overall.jpg budding paving detail.jpg OSCM18.JPc DSC09221.JPG DSC09222.JPG DSC09223.JPG •� m DSCN0414.JPG DSCN0415.JPG DSCN0416.JPG DSCN0484.JPG DSCN0486.JPG i, DSCN0487.JPG DSCN0488.JPG • I �.T DSCN0489.JPG c. m Doi, DSCN0485.JPG r • Y DSCN0490.JPG Owl DSCN0491.JPG Jl lv 1a +z DSCN0493.JPG DSCN0494.JPG DSCN0569.JPG Rr'r*trrwnn*rt�+f>� loll ,t 7mrivil � i •� � I IIwTr Adft DSCN0570.JPG DSCN0571.JPG DSCN0576.JPG 7 DSCN0577.JPG DSCN0578.JPG -Ak—" m DSCN0616.JPG DSCN0799.JPG DSCN1072.JPG DSCN1073.JPG rAV ! 3ERIt =.s DSCN1074.JPG M. DSCN1075.JPG DSCN1076.JPG DSCN1077.JPG DSCN1078.JPG DSCN1079.JPG 'c ♦L ,Y * � Sir * � a - i DSCN1080.JPG DSCN1081.JPG DSCN1082.JPG ., DSCN1()94 JPG DSCN1095_JPG ] 4 Y r DSCN1096.JPG DSCN1101.JPG DSCN1102.JPG I ] I nrT r °* * DSCN1103.JPG DSCN1104.JPG DSCN1106.JPG WEI a a DSCN1109.JPG DSCN1110.JPG DSCN1343.JPG Ilia DSCN1107.JPG rr EXTR- parking lot 01.JPG DSCN1108 JPG r� EXTR parking lot 05.JPG #�� or M EXTR pothole 02.JPG TR -taken near transformer.JF R -4530 2nd level canopy -side. :XTR -4530 2nd level entry.JP( fR4530 2nd level entry- side.J Jw 4A 7R -4530 2nd level entry- sign.J fR -4530 2nd evel entry- step.J EXTR -4530 base .JPG 1 -4530 base flashing at corner TR -4530 building and plazaA X P I am .XTR -4530 column detail.JPG _XTR4530 column return.JPC :XTR -4530 corner column.JPC XTR -4530 narrow window.JPt r r) EXTR -4530 plaza.JPG .TR -4530 precast canlilever.JF 1-4530 rainwater leader splast- KTR -4530 rainwater leader.JP EXTR -catch basin.JPG EXTR -Plaza 4530- 4550.JPG EXTR -side entry.jpg INTR cswk 93.JPG INTR - concrete fire stairs.JPG INTR -cswk 01.JPG INTR -cswk 18.JPG INTR - elevator door.JPG INTR IavatorieS.JPG INTR -4530 sump sink.JPG INTR -4530 sump.JPG r INTR -cswk 02.JPG INTR -cswk 03.JPG INTR -c =_wk 04.JPG INTR -cswk 08 JPG INTR -cswk 15.JPG INTR -cswk 09 JPG INTR -cswk 16.JPG INTR -cswk 17.JPG INTR- ewc.JPG INTR- Garage air inlake.JPG INTR - garage column.JPG v a�µ INTR- Garage corridor.JPG INTR- Garage framing.JPG R- Garage public access entry. INTR- Garage puddles O1.JPG INTR- Garage puddles 02.JPG K. INTR - Garage shoring 02.JPG INTR - Garage shoring 03.JPG INTR- Garage storage .JPG INTR- Garage storage 02.JPG R- Garage water damage 02.J bag R- Garage water damage 09— 'R- Garage water damage 10.J R- Garage water damage 11.J "R- Garage water damage 12.J rR- Garage water damage 13.j r il L ITR- Garage water ponding.JP INTR -HC Iavitorys.JPG INTR -hc toilet.JPG INTR - lavatories ADA.JPG INTR - lavatory 03.JPG INTR - lavatory sink.JPG INTR - rainwater leader .JPG i -4v 11 AM m INTR -open damper.JPG INTR -open wall.JPG INTR - railings at stair.JPG INTR- restroom door.jpg INTR - restroom vanity.jpg INTR- stairway 01.JPG INTR - stairway damper.JPG 7731 DSC09446.JPG DSC09447.JPG DSC09448.JPG DSC09449.JPG '\, J� I q77 6 DSCO9451JPG DSCO9452 -JPG DSC09453.JPG DSC09454.JPG �w s DSC09461.JPG DSC09462.JPG DSC09466.JPG DSC09467.JPG DSC09471.JPG DSC09472.JPG DSC09463.JPG DSC09464.JPG DSC09450.JPG LiiJ� Los Ammmm� -AL o DSC09468.JPG DSC09469.JPG DSC09470.JPG .Y- DSCO9473 -JPG DSC09474.JPG DSC09475.JPG ors �/� �0 DSC09476.JPG DSC09477.JPG DSCO9478 JPG DSC09479.JPG DSC09480.JPG DSC09481.JPG . _ aA L. LLu' 9� DSC09482.JPG DSC09483.JPG DSC09484.JPG DSC09485.JPG DSC09486.JPG DSC09487.JPG DSCN0345 JPG DSCN0346.JPG DSC09488.JPG DSCN0347.JPG DSC09489.JPG DSCN0344.JPG NUNN L"W DSCN0348.JPG DSCN0349.JPG ;ji �s .,,0 Alp DSCN0350.JPG DSCN0351.JPG DSCN0352.JPG DSCN0380.JPG DSCN0381.JPG DSCN0388.JPG DSCN0392.JPG DSCN0393.JPG B d. DSCN0389.JPG gig DSCN0394.JPG mo DSCN0390.JPG �I DSCN0395.JPG fyf DSCN0391.JPG DSCN0396.JPG p � I t DSCN0397.JPG 'T ' DSCN0402.JPG DSCN0403.JPG 1% IN kk DSCN0407.JPG DSCN,3408.JPG DSCN0418.JPG 4 DSCN0423.JPG DSCN0419.JPG W!- DSCN0424.JPG I ' DSCN0429.JPG DSCNI)428.JPG DSCN0404.JPG 1 DSCN0405.JPG DSCN0406 JPG DSCN0409.JPG R •T•T�I I I r DSCN0420.JPG DSCN0410.JPG DSCN0421.JPG DSCN0422.JPG Fy X � r � V o DSCN0425.JPG DSCN0426.JPG DSCN•)427.JPG DSCN0430.JPG t •+ 1 s fI�f i DSCN0431.JPG DSCN0433.JPG DSCN0434.JPG DSCN0435.JPG DSCN0445.JPG b 0 1 "i DSCN0432.J PG DSCN0465.JPG I w3 DSCN0430.JPG t •+ 1 s fI�f i DSCN0431.JPG DSCN0433.JPG DSCN0434.JPG DSCN0435.JPG DSCN0445.JPG b 0 1 "i DSCN0432.J PG DSCN0465.JPG DSCN0466.JPG DSCN-3476 JPG DSCN0467 -JPG DSCN0468.JPG DSCN0469 -JPG DSCN0472.JPG DSCNJ477 JPG DSCN0473.JPG s e ;�, it DSCN0478.JPG DSCN0474.JPG DSCN0479.JPG 1 . DSCN )470.JPG "", 744�" DSCN0475.JPG DSCN0480.JPG r ,..cam -. DSCN0481.JPG DSCN0482.JPG DSCN0483.JPG DSCN0617.JPG DSCN0618.JPG LA DSCN0619.JPG DSCN0625.JPG B I i� • � I DSCN0620JPG DSCN 1408.JPG EXTR -curb stop curbing.JPG EXTR- drainage ditch 02.JPG ti 1 , DSCN0621.JPG DSCN0622.JPG EXTR-blvd EXTR - building corner.JPG OL EXTR - drainge ditch JPG 1 EXTR- buildings.JPG EXTR -entry JPG EXTR- Flashing base 01.JPG EXTR- flashing base 02.JPG EXTR - flashing base 03.JPG EXTR - landscaping 03.JPG EXTR - parking lot 02.JPG EXTR - parking lot 04.JPG j+ EXTR - landscaping 01.JPG EXTR - landscaping 02.JPG EXTR- second floor entry.jpg DSCN 1406.JPG t_? IMG '658.JPG �1t1111,� IMG '663.JPG IMG '668.JPG I IMG '673.JPG IMG_'654.JPG IMG_1655.JPG IMG_1656.JPG IMG_'657.JPG IMG '659.JPG IMG '664.JPG IMG '669.JPG IMG '674.JPG IMG '679.JPG IMG '685.JPG i d IMG_1660.JPG IMG_1665.JPG IMG_1661.JPG IMG_' 662.JPG 1 _ 'may. IMG_1666.JPG IMG_1670.JPG IMG_1671.JPG k' IMG_1675.JPG . IMG_1676.JPG IMG_' 667.JPG " y i, X11111111 J. IMG_' 672.JPG l IMG_' 677.JPG �I., .aq �Yt � �. .t. � '�1�'• 1 . IMG 1680.JPG IMG 1681.JPG IMG '683.JPG u ?194 mla uJJ 1 IMG_1686.JPG IMG_1687.JPG IMG -699.JPG IMG 1700.JPG IMG 1701.JPG a IMG -697.JPG DSCN0983.JPG DSCN1062.JPG DSCN0919.JPG m DSCN0980.JPG DSCN0984.JPG DSCN0985.JPG DSCN0981.JPG -A DSCN0982.JPG DSCN1023.JPG DSCNI061.JPG DSCN1063.JPG DSCN1064.JPG DSCN1065.JPG DSCN1066.JPG OSCN1068.JPG If I�1; Yy: b�'Y.I:�I�e��bYy`.UI:YI•IRI:Ze7 p !`4 . at �l T a fb1~Y*7.`b Xk L'ie by 7,`b>rR? I: e3 DSCN0975.JPG R, Y DSCN0987.JPG DSCN0992.JPG 11 DSCN0923.JPG DSCN0927.JPG DSCN0930.JPG DSCN0931.JPG DSCN0932.JPG i DSCN0935.JPG DSCN0936.JPG DSCN0937.JPG DSCN0976.JPG DSCN0977.JPG DSCN0979.JPG DSCN0986.JPG oil Y No DSCN1009.JPG DSCN1010.JPG DSCN1011.JPG DSCN0990.JPG DSCN0991.JPG W. „ f TE DSCN0995.JPG DSCN0996.JPG a I DSCN1012.JPG DSCN1013.JPG ar Ar �« t lot is�] DSCN1014.JPG DSCN1015.JPG DSCN1016.JPG DSCN1017.JPG DSCN1018.JPG DSCN1019.JPG DSCN1020.JPG •: -in DSCN0915.JPG DSCN0916.JPG DSCN0917.JPG DSCN0938.JPG DSCN0939.JPG l DSCN0958JPG DSCN0959.JPG DSCN0960.JPG DSCN0961.JPG DSCN0962.JPG FA DSCN0963.JPG DSCN0964 J= DSCN0965.JPG DSCN0966.JPG DSCN0967 JPG DSCN0969.JPG DSCN1026.JPG s b DSCN1030.JPG DSCN1031.JPG DSCN1035.JPG DSCN1040.JPG DSCN1041.JPG A s DSCN1027.JPG DSCN1028 -JPG DSCN1032.JPG DSCN1033.JPG DSCN1037.JPG DSCN 1029.JPG DSCN1034.JPG DSCN1038.JPG DSCN1039.JPG DSCN 1050.JPG DSCN1063.JPG DSCN 1068.JPG DSCN 1046.JPG DSCN1051.JPG DSCN1064.JPG �1 IMG_5243.JPG j YA •� IIIIIEL r DSCN1047.JPG DSCN1060.JPG DSCN1065.JPG DSCN 1048.JPG DSCN1061.JPG P.J DSCN 1049.JPG DSCN 1062.JPG DSCN1066.JPG DSCN1067.JPG DSCN0940.JPG DSCN0945.JPG Er► DSCN0941.JPG Am LAW- DSCN0942.JPG DSCN0943.JPG DSCN0944.JPG � a •, a tee. a 'fi`'''r•; l DSCN0950.JPG DSCN0946.JPG DSCN0951.JPG DSCN0947.JPG DSCN0948.JPG DSCN0949.JPG i awl �ti'+ �� ' j t � r �•X i` DSCN0952.JPG r IA DSCN0954.JPG DSCN0956.JPG DSCN0957.JPG DSCN0968.JPG DSCN13970.JPG DSCN0971.JPG DSCN0972.JPG DSCN0973.JPG raw .y A- DSCNIO07.JPG 10 DSCN1008.JPG DSCN1052.JPG DSCN1053.JPG DSCN1056.JPG DSCN1057.JPG DSCN1058.JPG e DSCN 1059.JPG -_ , r- DSCN0910.JPG DSCN0911.JPG DSCN0912.JPG Yyy DSCN0924.JPG two f DSCN0925.JPG DSCN0926.JPG Awl DSCN1054 -JPG DSCN1055.JPG DSCN1056.JPG 400�,', DSCN 1059.JPG DSCN 1060.JPG r, .1 DSCN0913.JPG DSCN 1052.JPG DSCN1057.JPG DSCN0914.JPG ` I . DSCN 1053.JPG DSCN 1058.JPG Appendix G Findings Including But/For Qualifications The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan) for Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (District), as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10. The District consists of 16 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for commercial /industrial purposes. At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan.) Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely throughprivate investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely throughprivate investment within the reasonablyforeseeablefuture: This finding is supported by the fact that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. Specifically, the redevelopment will result in job creation opportunities, enhanced public improvements, better management of storm water, and increased green space on the privately owned parcels. The developer has demonstrated that the costs of soils corrections, structured parking, demolition, and street/sidewalk improvements make this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer has already applied for and been granted and will continue to apply for State and Metropolitan Council funding for redevelopment costs. The developer was asked for and provided a proforma as justification that the development would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. (See attachment in Appendix G of the TIF Plan.) The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax incrementfinancing would be less than the increase in market value estimatedto resultfrom theproposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: The property has operated for the last several years as a lower rent office development. The current owner of the site has demonstrated that small amounts of private investment would make the existing structures commercially viable for an extended period of time. However, the City and the developer's vision is for much higher quality work spaces and hospitality opportunities that require significant upgrades to the stability of the soils and the infrastructure in the area. Another new use is not likely to be able to afford the costs of demolition and soils stabilization, especially on the scale of the proposed development, without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. Appendix G -1 11 Therefore, the City concludes as follows: 3. 4. Appendix a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0. b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be $421,890,074 (see Appendix D of the TIF Plan) C. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $65,325,714 (see Appendix D of the TIF Plan). d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $356,564,360 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without tax increment assistance. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. Finding that the TIFPIan for the District will affordmaximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise. The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high quality development to the City. But -For Analysis Current Market Value 18,724,900 New Market Value - Estimate 440,614,974 Difference 421,890,074 Present Value of Tax Increment 65,325,714 Difference 356,564,360 Value Likely to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: 356,564,360 G -2 Appendix H Building Permits Appendix H -1 Report,Natne: i —nit Search City of Edina Printed: 1/2/2014 Page: I Permit Search Results Permit fi , Permit Tgpc Sub Tyne Work Type Description Hous Street knit Issued Oat c final Date';. Dead Date "Cancel Date Exn'Date . Valunlion Pe ermit User User 2 ED.128097` Building Offce,Ban Alteration// dnstall (2) 4010 t', 77th- St' {1Vs' 12P- 0/2013: 'a 3,600 No jl jws k,Professio cmodel fire nal dampers -boi (324or437 ler nrd(2) in elevator equip rm ED126486 Building Office,Ban Alteration/R Interior X600' ~'- 776�9 C,W' 355 FOGG & If/1fD Ui3F� 61,480 No jl j%vs k,Professio emodel tenant POWERS/ nal improvemen PENTAG (324or437 is ON PARK ED125655 Building Restaurant New Tenant Tenant 4920 77th St W MAKERS 12102/2013 275,000 No jl, (327or437 Finish improvemen CAFE' is ED126014 Building Office;Ban New'renant new tenant { 4600 i7,�11i Si'.W.- 200 VICTORY :1,1/192013 33,788 No jo sk k,Profesio Finish _ SALES nal (324or437 ED127235 Building Office Ban Addition Install cgress,`i'451Q; r =77111,StN PENTAG 1 1115/2013. 6,700 No jl sk k;Professio system to ON PARK nal card,access (324or437 doors - fire, alarm trigger ED125439 Build_ ing Office,Ban New Tenant tenant ;4600 7,77 Sft'W 275 ` 1028/_013'' 24,720 No jo k Professio Finish improvemen "� nal. t (324or437 j ED125411 Building Industrial Maintenance remove roof 4625 77th St W SEAGATE 10282013 157,000 No jo it Buildinb, /Repair /Rcpt membrane -i (320or437 ) ace nstall new ED124379 Building, Office,Ban New Tenant Interior 4940 77thStW CAFE 10/212013 483;395 No _1 jh k,Professio Finish buildout for INC. nal new tenant (324or437 ) ED124361 Building Office, Ban Alteration/R Instal lcgressr -W.70, 27 ltNSi`W PENTAG 10/18/2013 ='sl1 /06/2013 5,300. No jl k,Professio emodel' system to ON PARK nal card access (324or437 doors ED124860' Building Office,Ban Alteration /R Install egress -4600 77tft!St1N PENTAG ,r10/1840131 01/062013 5300 No jl k,Professio emodel system to ON PARK - nal card access (324or437 doors Report N'ame: Permit Search - City of Edina Primed: 1/2/2014 _ Page: 2 Permit Search Results Permit # Permit Tvoe„ ub T e Work Tyne Description , -House treet Unit ll u Issued Date Final Date Dead Datc Cancel Date EYn Date V is io cr it User l User 2 . EQ125268 Building Office,Ban Maintenance remodel 4625 77th St W SEAGATE 10/172013 12/30/2013 43,000 No jo 1h k,Professio /Repair/Repl existing nal ace struct steel (324or437 support for new air handler on roof ED124538 :Building Office,Ban New Tenant interior Q45I0- 77th'St1w; 4'I 0/ 1.720.13';;: 16,538 No j k,Professio Finish remodel nal (324or437 ED123319 - .Building. Restaurant New Tenant . INTERIOR •4970 77th St W Red Savoy 10/17/2013 231,011 No jo )11 (327or437 Finish TENANT Pula ) FINISH ED121'198 Building Off ice,Ban Alteration/R Stabaliratio Y4s10 `' 77th St,W PENTAG 10 %152013u;= 82;847 No it jws k,Professio emodel n/entry &.hc ON .- ' nal ramp, Sex it PARK - (324or437 systems; -rai 1WS ` Is ED123581 Building Oftice,Ban New Tenant small tenant 4570 77th St W 365 10/14/2013 68,686 -. No jo k Professio finish improvemen nal: t • (324or437 ) ED1242I'I Building Office,Ban Alteration/R Interior, 4625 77th St W Seagate- 10/07/2013 12/20/2013 280,000 No. j jh k,Professio emodel remodel In -fill nal John (324or437 ED123700 Building Officc Ban New Tenant small tenant 4,600., —'_ _"�,7.7tWSvW 350 + 10/03/2013: 10/302013 33,214 No j k Professio .Finish improvemen nal t (324or437 ED122496 Building o Office; 'Ban Aherauon/R Remodel 1470 ,77th,SUW 350 LIFESPAR'�07 /302013dc 09/102013.,. 60,503 No jl jws _ k Professio emodel tenant office ' r y�Y K nal suite (324or437 ED121883 Building Offtce,Ban New Tenant small.tenant 4510 -: 77th,St;)Vr: GREAT07 /302U13t_; 41,236 No j jws k,Professio Finish improvemen CLIPS nal t (324or437 Report Name: Permit Search City of Edina Printed: 1/2/2014 Page: 3 Permit Search Results Permit # PermitTvne" SubTvne WorkTvoe Descriptinn House• "_" Street. Unit Use Issued Date FinafDate 'Dead Date Ciincel "Date Exn Date Valuation ePermit User t User ED121780 Building Office,Ban New Tenant SMALL x,4600 , 77thSikW- 200 PENTAG 0,7/2313 0 1 3; 176,944 No J jws k,Professio "Finish TENANT ON PARK `_ nal IMPROVE N_ ORTH (324or437 MENT ED121828 Building Office,Ban New Tenant INTERIOR x510 - 77th& -W 216 D.J. 07/11/2013 09/03/201 3 9,323 No JO jws k,Professio Finish REMODEL- Fretland nal (324or437 ) ED121827 Building Office,Ban New Tenant INTERIOR 130 The 1/2013 " 08/30/2013 19,413 No JO jws I: Professio Finish REMODEL Slatery nal Sales" (324or437 ) Group ED120748 Building Office Ban Alteration/11 Small tenant ;4 70 <77th'Se:W 315 Edina 04!25/2013 05/292013 10.500 No jl sk k.Profcssio emodel improvemen Comfort nal t Care (324or437 ED120747 Building Office,Ban Alteration/R Small tenant 45.10 r:7;ZlhS Vv<':: 220 PENTAG 04/25/2013 7,050 No jl sk k,Professio emodel improvemen ON nal t PARK/NO (324or437 RTH BLDG ED120721 Building Office,Ban Alteration/R Tenant 4570 77th St W 265 SUPREM '042512013 04/302013 26;200 No jl sk k,' Professio cmodel improvemen E nl t LENDING (324or437 /PENTAG " ON PARK ED120628 Building Office,Ban New Tenant "Minor 4570 77th St W 335 INTERNA 04/152013 04/30/2013 7,500 No gh sk k,Professio Finish remodel of TIONAL nal tenant office ADOPTIO (324or437 suite -716 N sq ft SERVICE S ED120446 Building Office,Ban "Maintenance window 4600 77thStW 04/15/2013 231,103 No j sk k,Professio /Repair /Reps replacement nal ace (324or437 ED120346 Building Office,Ban New Tenant window 4530 77th St "W PENTAG 03/2812013 350,000 No -_ j sk k,Professio Finish replacement ON PARK nal & interior (324or437 finish Report-Name: Permit Search Building Cityoffdina Printed: 113/2014 modification. dw_n,��-"Iii5 CALIHOU K 677/62011, Page: I 60,000 k,Profe,ssio Permit Search Results of existing Permit # Permit'rvne Sub Tyne Work Tyne Description Hon Street Unit Use Issued Date Final Dat Dead Date Cancel Date Eft Dateyoluation em m1 User I User 2, .ED122397 Building Office.Ban Alteration/R 66P"' Renovate a wn .408 EAGLE'S,-67M36.IV 28,'037 No jI jws k,Profcssio emodel exist tenant Ave FLIGHT COMPANI• nal space OF (324or437 (324or437 AMEBIC ES A Building 'ED121521 Building Office,Ban NewTcnant modification. dw_n,��-"Iii5 CALIHOU K 677/62011, jh 60,000 k,Profe,ssio Finish of existing Ave No N 'ej nal tenant space COMPANI• (324or437 ES ED121254 Building Officc,Ban Alteration/R Renovations- X7600 ` -..- k Professio emodel to interior Avc ON PARK nal common (324or437 spaces °ED121690 '.Building Office.Ban Alteration/Z Tenant 6 -7 7" =w 200 The Deley �16q62.0 3,_ .k,Prdf6ssio emodd' improvemen Ave Group nal t - existing (324or437 office space ED101268 Building Officc,Ban New Tenant interior 7600 Parklawn 103 MARTIN 08/11/2010 09/01/2010 k,Professio Finish remodel Ave EYE nal CARE (324or437 ED084278 Building OfficeBan Maintenance TENANT 7600 Parklawn 403 THURL 10/16/2007 1,1/062007 kProfessio /Repair /Rep/ REMODEL Ave QUIGLEY nal ace (324or437 •ED045038 Building Office/War Alteration/R Tenant 7600 PARKLA 150 FIDELITY 04/30/2007 01222016 chouse emodel finish W`N'AVE BANK (320or437 ED09308 Building Office.Ban AlteraLion/R Tenant 7600 PARKLA 450 ALL 06/02/2006 07/1312006 k,Professio cmodel finish WNAVE CITIES nal MORTGA •324or437 GE ED032017 Building Office/War Alteration/R Tenant 7600 PARKLA 225 REALTY 03123/2005 chouse emodel finish WN AV E (320or437 -ED024835 Building Office,Ban Alteration/R Tenant 7600 PARKLA 350 FARMER- 01/0512004 01/242004 kProfessio emodel IMPROVE WN'AVE S nal MENTS FINANCI (324or437 AL 71,650 No -jo jws 104,020 No jI jh 23,613 No ji jws .40,006. No jo jb 12,000 No B 423,000 No 60,000 No 17,530 No 35,532 No 'ej To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Scott Neal City Manager Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: City-of Edina and Edina Public Schools Partnership Goals Action Requested: /NA �r O e =� o '�CfIR1Y ?lir 1�� Ik1HH Agenda Item #: VIII. A. Action Discussion Information ❑ Approve the proposed 2014 Commitment to Partnership Goals by and between the City of Edina and the Edina Public Schools. Information / Background: The City of Edina and Edina Public Schools work in close partnership to develop joint operational goals for the upcoming year. The leadership teams from both organizations have been meeting regularly since 2011 to develop and implement the annual goals, and to continue our successful, collaborative working relationship. The Commitment to Partnership goals are monitored jointly by the Superintendent and City. Manager. Attached is the draft 2014 Commitment to Partnership Goals as approved by the Edina School Board at their January 27, 2014, board meeting. Upon adoption by the City Council, implementation of the 2014 goals can begin. Periodic reports will be provided to both the City Council and School Board thoroughout the year. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 X00 ' �° T, CIS DEFINING EXCELLENCE 2014 (DRAFT) City of Edina and "Edina Public Schools Commitment to Partnership Targeted Partnership Goals City and School District staff will conduct ongoing, conversations and actions in the following partnerships: 1. To advance discussions and problem - solving related to joint facilities use, including recreational facilities and the Grandview Area Plan (Dressen & Stein / Neal & Kattreh) 2. To enhance community communications and public engagement, including neighborhood associations (Bennerotte /Brott) 3. To coordinate community technology services, including in the areas of cable television, internet access, and system infrastructure (Buettner /Bennerotte) 4. To improve youth life services and programs for youth life challenges through coordination of community resources (Smasal & Kodrich / Long',& Neal) 5. To enhance joint community education and volunteer opportunities (Burke %Kattreh) 6. To coordinate select staff training areas (Jackson /Schaefer) 7. To seek innovative approaches to support the changing demographics of the Edina community (Dressen /Neal) Internal Insights Keys to Leadership Success • Commit <to'transparency and accountability • Focus on approved goals and work plan (cannot to it all) • Serve through District and City values • Maintain open communications and provide accurate information hA2014 school -city goals \city- district joint goals 2014 - attachment.docx To: MAYOR & COUNCIL ch O IHHH Agenda Item #: VIII. B. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: New On -Sale Wine & Beer On -Sale Liquor Licenses, Red Savoy Action Requested: Motion approving New On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Licenses to, Savoy Edina LLC, dba Red's Savoy, at 4960 and 4970 West 77th Street, for the period beginning February 18, 2014 and ending March 31, 2014. Information / Background: Savoy Edina LLC; dba Red's Savoy, at 4960 and 4970 West 77th Street has applied for new on -sale wine liquor and 3.2 beer licenses. This will be anew restaurant. They have. filed the necessary paperwork,and . paid the applicable fees for the license.. The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code requirements. The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant's plan for storage and service. The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements. The Police Department has completed their investigation. Attached is Sgt. Tim Olson's memo stating the findings of the Police Department's background investigation. The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 PERCENT MALT LIQUOR LICENSE Establishment: Red's Savoy Pizza License: On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor December 2013, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City of Edina application for an On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. The application was submitted by Savoy Edina LLC, DBA: Red's Savoy Pizza. Red's Savoy Pizza will operate from 4960 West 77" Street, Edina. Savoy Edina LLC is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of Minnesota. Savoy Edina LLC is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary of State. Savoy Edina LLC and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to employee alcohol awareness..training. The training date is currently scheduled for 1/28/14 and will be provided by the Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association. Owners/Partners/Members: Savoy Edina LLC: Michael Mergens Eden Prairie MN David Stenseth Rosemount MN Jeff Thames Mendota Heights MN Ashley Daniels Eden Prairie MN Franklin Sunberg Lilydale MN Michael Meents Mendota Heights MN Jason Blomquist Richfield MN The owners /partners /members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies: NCIC MINCIS Hennepin County Minnesota Secretary of State Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively. From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent Savoy Edina LLC, DBA: Red's Savoy Pizza, from obtaining an On Sale Wine and 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor license. I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of this license. Sgt. Tim Olson #142 a/te To: Mayor and City Council Agenda Item #: VIII-C. From: Ann Kattreh Action Parks & Recreation Director Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Sports Dome, Outdoor Rink and Arena Improvements Budget Estimate Update and Bid Authorization Action Requested: Provide project design direction on Sports Dome, outdoor rink and arena project based on increased project cost estimates. Based on project design direction, provide authorization for advertisement of bid package one for Sports Dome, outdoor rink and arena project. Information / Background: On October 14,2013 the City Council directed staff to begin the design phase of the Sports Dome, outdoor refrigerated rink and arena improvements (Braemar project) at Braemar Arena and the Braemar athletic field. Staff has retained Cuningham Group architects, and RJM as construction manager. As' design progressed, soil conditions evaluated and code compliance issues addressed, several factors have been identified which are expected to increase the project cost by approximately $2 million. Please see attached RJM Construction Budget Summary. Paul Kolias, RJM Construction, and Kathy Wallace, Cuningham Group, will be at the City Council meeting to answer questions. If the council is interested in cutting costs for the Braemar portion of the project, the elimination of the outdoor refrigerated rink would save approximately $1.5 million. Since the east arena's R- 22 refrigeration system needs to be replaced by 2020, it is important that the new ammonia system for the east arena be replaced as part of this project. The site of the outdoor rink could be prepped but the outdoor refrigeration, boards and roof could be postponed. The Pamela Park renovation project is still in the design phase and cost estimates have not been obtained. Staff has identified a potential site improvement and cost saving proposal for Pamela Park. Staff will propose to slightly increase the size of the lighted artificial turf field, eliminating the need for the new sand peat field. This will significantly increase the amount of use for the artificial turf with just increasing the artificial turf field from approximately 225'x 380' to 250'x 380'. The location of the proposed "new" sand peat field is currently uneven and dangerous for athletics. Instead of adding a new sand peat field, this site could be graded, re- seeded and irrigated to provide a high quality multipurpose grass field space (similar to Highlands Park fields) for athletic and neighborhood use. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 In order to keep the Braemar project on track for a November /December 2014 opening, staff requests that the council authorize bid package one for advertisement. Bid package one will contain items that have long lead times, particularly for manufacturing. Staff and consultants will adjust the scope of the project based on council's decision tonight regarding the increased budget estimate and project scope and design. Staff will continue to work with RJM on the construction schedule, but the additional site work at Braemar is expected to delay the project completion by approximately one month to December 5, 2014. The schedule will be tightened wherever possible to open the facilities as soon as possible. The City of Edina received a $250,000 Hennepin Youth Sports Grant for the Sports Dome. This grant is not included in the project budget. Attachments: Braemar Site Diagram Braemar Site Improvement Plan Arena Renovation Plan Accessory Building Rendering East Arena Entry and Fire Pit Rendering Outdoor Rink Rendering Construction Budget Summary Conceptual Estimate Summary Detailed Construction Cost Breakdown October 8, 2013 Project Estimate Preliminary Construction Schedule Updated Pamela Site Plan 1► 4 i A, •. HORNETS NEST WEST ARENA i I AP t� � � 6'6 EXISTING PARKING EXISTING PLAYGROUND EXISTING PLAYING FIELDS ,i 1 EAST ARENA SOUTH ARENA i r l I t Edina Sports Dome and Outdoor Ice Rink /Existing Site C U N I N G H A M G R 0 U P EXISTING PARKING r- EXISTING PARKING 1► Edina Sports Dome and Outdoor Ice Rink /New Site WEDESDAV12,.1014 CUNINGHAM G R 0 U P Edina Sports Dome and Outdoor Ice Rink /East Arena WEDESDAY 12, 2014 C U N I N G H A M G R 0 U P i t i OFFICE FRONT DESK LOBBY STORAGE WOMENS MEN$ -- MECHANICAL /ELECTRICAL P Edina Sports Dome and Outdoor Ice Rink /Accessory Building WEDNESDAY 12, 2014 C U N I N G H A M G R 0 U P Edina Sports Dome and Outdoor Ice Rink/ View frome Dome Facing the East Arena Entry and Firepit 64EDNFSDAV ?2, 2011 C U N I N G H A M G R 0 U P JW .� .rr a� MWV lopw ILI 77 1 T Ar AFI'\ Y Al 1A low AV AW A ��� VOW v $4; AmW AW I AA *001, A0111 r iL a , vw rr 4w AV tom i i A Mw �s Am & `- -� +, **,Nil . ' 4 e low- IV ow AOW * -i000l _ _ a,, Construction Budget Summary MINNEAPOLIS OFFICE 701 Washington Avenue North #600 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 952- 837 -8600 CONSTRUCTUON TO: Ann Kattreh Parks and Recreation Director City of Edina FROM: Paul Kolias DATE: February 12, 2014 RE: Edina Sports Dome Construction Budget Summary This is a brief summary outlining the estimate changes to the Edina Sports Dome Project since the initial estimate dated 10 -8 -13 (attached). Since this estimate we have received complete site survey, soil boring logs and preliminary soils report, and have had discussions and meetings with the City Building Department. These documents, discussions and meetings have impacted the initial estimate. Also attached is our current design development estimate and detailed construction cost breakdown dated 2- 12 -14. These estimates are based on development of the current facility size, components and location on site. The values that have been established are conceptual in nature, providing anticipated magnitude of costs based on design development plans prepared by Cuningham Architects and their consultants. At this time the project is over the initial estimate /budget dated 10 -8 -13 in the amount of $2,066,817 (total project estimate). An exact comparison of the two estimates is difficult because the recent estimate is more detailed. However, there have been significant cost increases in two of the major project components: East Arena Ice Equipment and Site Work. The largest impact to the project has been the increase in site work. Site work cost increases are due to the following: • required soil correction at the existing soccer field • additional access roads around the dome, requiring additional retaining walls • expanded area of site work for increased separation of structures • raised grades to accommodate proper ADA access to the East Arena and Sports Dome Accessory Building partial renovation of existing west parking lot to accommodate access These items contribute to the $1,746,507 construction cost difference in Site Work between the initial estimate and the current one; see Site Work column on the Detailed Construction Cost Breakdown. The soil - corrections have also impacted the schedule; due to the need to excavate and replace soils the project schedule is extended by four weeks. Final completion of the project is set for December 5, 2014. The East Arena Ice Equipment component includes the work to replace the refrigeration equipment for the existing East Arena' rink (for ammonia refrigerant), and enlarge it to handle the outdoor ice sheet. The cost increases are due to un- anticipated equipment material cost increases and the need to relocate and upgrade the existing electric service. The relocation is needed in order to allow room for the new ice equipment within the existing - mechanical equipment room. The equipment cost increase and needed electrical service (and space) improvements total approximately $650,293 (construction cost). The other project components are under the initial conceptual estimate set, as a group, by $649,255 (construction cost), but do include some increases in scope. First, the projected dome cost includes Tedlar coating for longevity and an additional liner for energy efficiency. Second; the Outdoor Ice Sheet roof canopy is required to be non - combustible, so costs for a metal roof and heavier structural steel is included. Owner costs: The total increase between the initial estimate and the current estimate also includes $319,272 in Owner costs, fees and non - construction contingencies, which mostly increase In proportion to expanded scope /cost. The Owner Contingency line -item (4% of estimated construction cost) is to offset any increase in Owner soft costs that come up through the life of the project. The Design. Contingency line -item is 4% of estimated construction cost, typical for this phase of design, and is in to absorb design changes not estimated that come up during final development of documents Both of these are not fixed and could potentially be reduced. The third contingency, Construction contingency (for hidden conditions or other unexpected costs during the construction process) is addressed in the Total Construction Cost line item. Soil Corrections: A brief explanation of the required soil correction: the soil information obtained in November indicates a significant amount of buried debris in various areas under the soccer field. Several test pits were dug to determine the extent of the debris and condition of surrounding soils. Braun Intertec reported that soils in which the debris was found are not contaminated and the debris found was found to have been placed in a controlled manner. With these findings Braun Intertec recommended two options to deal with the buried debris: remove all debris from the site at a cost of $250,000 or sub -cut the site 5', re- compact the subgrade soils and place existing soils back in -place at a cost $112,000. This sub -cut and placing of existing soils creates a `bridge' over the debris and allows the use of conventional spread footings for the foundation systems being used on the project. The 5' sub -cut approach is included in the current estimate. Scope - Reduction Option: One option to bring project closer to budget would be delete the portion of the work associated with the Outdoor Ice Sheet, specifically the East Arena Renovation (team rooms, toilets) and Outdoor Ice Sheet and roof. The value of the two components is $1,589,651. This approach would still include the ammonia refrigeration infrastructure and the soil corrections to allow the outdoor ice Sheet to be installed at a later date. Should this option be considered and constructed at a later date, the cost would be expected to increase, both for escalation (at this time cost escalation is 1% per month for the remainder of 2014), and due to�greater constraints for construction. By considering the option above the Total Project Estimate amount would adjust down to $10,855,766, approximately $477,000 above the conceptual estimate dated 10 -8 -13 of $10,378,600. CONSTRUCTION 'Conceptual Estimate summary DESCRIPTION CONCEPTUAL ESTIMATE SUMMARY ESTIMATE DATE: February 12, 2014 Conmucdon COM, -.- PROJECT: Edina Sports Dome ARCHITECT: Cunnlgham Group $28,000 DRAWING PATE: December 16 2013 - - DESCRIPTION Notes Base Estimate $/d 730 000 Conmucdon COM, -.- Demolition. $28,000 $O.0 Concrete - - 5444 431 $1.93 Masonry $284,568 $1.24 Structural Steel barrel . vault roof $475,759 $2.07 Rough Ca 155132 0.67 Finish Carpentry/Millwork $21,117 S0.09 Metal Panel &Metal Roof t208,950 $0.91 Roofing $7.7,694. $034 Dint Sealants $5,500 $0.02 Doors Frames Hardware $20146 $0.09 overhead Doors 522.500 $0.10. Alumlrum Entrances &storefront $28.285 0.12 Gypsum Drywall $9,023 $0.04 Tile $19,280 $0.08 Acoustical CeMmis SO $0.00 Rubber Flowing $13,926 $0.06 Pain' $74593 $0.32 MNallaneaous Specialties 117,924 30.08 Dome' tedlar coating, bubble Insut LED llghdnq $1,481,927 $6..44 Turf . FleldTurf XTHD -50 slit film 2" $380,220 1.65 Ice Rink Refrigeration .Dasher Boa temp Chiller $1,517,250 $6.60 Fire Protection $5,794 $0.01 plurnwria $99,900 $0.43 HVAC $42,500. 0.18 Electrical site fighting, radiant heat at players benches $1,202,000 $5.23 Earthwork soli correction .7 sub -cut $112,ODO - $1,436,379 $6:25 PM&q Lot $57.710 $0.25 Access Roads $162,171 $0.71 Site Concrete $115,000 50.50 Fire Pit $52,000 $0.23 Retaking Malls ' $397,320 1:73 Landscapinq & Irrigation $75,000 $0.33 Site Utilities - IBS 294 $0.82 Site Fence 128,950 $0.13 Final Cleardna $5000 $0.02 General Conditions. $387,932 $1.69 General Liatillity Insurance $95,424 $0.41 Builders Risk Insurance $4,626 S0.02 Building Permlt $96,761 $0.42 Band $0 50.00 SVtft9W1C0n5buc6OnCOS&.. $9,739,195 234' Contingency 486 959. S2.12 Contractors Fee $0 $0.00 roWCOnsftx j?Estinrate fi0226 45 (4446 owner C"ft -- CM Fee .._- 2.85% $291,445 $1.27 Son Allowance ' 515,000 $0.07 Dome FEE Allowance $100,000 .'$0.43 Building FFE Allowance $20,000 $0.09 Technology Allowance $100,000 - $0.43 Utility Relocation Allowance $100,000 .$0.43 SftqWAC Allowance 5151000 $0.07 Watershed Allowance $3,000 $0.01 5nblob %OwnerCosTc_ - -- _ f64g445 ..___._ -.. *280 Arch. Design Fees- 7.40% . $756;735 $3.29 SirbEOtalOes nFees . -. _.__._... _...- _._*756,735 $a29 C089991811cy Owner Contingency 4% $409,046 $1.78 Design Contingency 4% $409,046 .51.78 5nbirolSlConN -- *Bi6092 ;356 row Pfyject aril ale $12,445,416 *54 i1 1. R. ESTIMATE DATE: February 12, 2014 Detailed Construction Cost Breakdown CONSTRUCTION East Arena Accessory ,Dome & Support Interior Outdoor Ice East Arena Ice Description CM Fee Alletna to $291,445 Sall Borings Allowance Demolition to to $8.000 0 $20,000 0 $2 000 - Cohue6e $24.S5 S301131 $3,900 $100,000 $12.915 0 4444 431 Mason - $195,618 $57,660 $20,000 1 0 511290 0 $284,568 Structural Steel $31044 S23.965 $13,900 $406,850 0 $0 $475,759 Rough .$2,295 $%,2321 $0 $56,605 0 $0, $155,132 Finish Ca Millwork S6 334 to 534 783 . $0 $0 so .$21,117 Metal Panel & Metal Root 30 $0 $0' $208.950 $0 0 208 950 Roofing $43,979 $33,915 10 0 SD to S77894 Joint Sealants $2,000 $1.500 1000 $1000 so 0 $51500 Doors' Frames Hardware $11,295 $0 $5.691) 0 $3,161 0 20146 Overhead Doors 0 $22,500 so 40 0 so $22,500 Alumlaum Entrances& Storefront. M.2115 1 so $0 0 0 0 $26,285 Gypsum Drywall $9.023 1 40 40 0 S0 S0 -S9023 Tile' $11.853 So - $7427 $0 so -$0 1 _ $19,280 Acoustical Celin s $0 S0 0 0 so 01 to RUb6er Flooring D $13,926 S0 SD So $13926 PaIntina $11271 $0 $11084 $52,238 $0 so $74,593 MlscePaoeaous Specialties $10,702 57222 0 so to S17,924 Dame 0 51481927 so SO $1,481,927 Turf 0 $3801220 0 0 0 0 $380,220 Ire Rlnk Refrigeration I Dasher Boards ' to $W t0 5217,250 $1.301000 so 1517 250 - Fire Protection $3.294 $0 $1.500 $0 $0 0 $5,794 Plumbing $75,900 $0 $24,000' $0 0 0 199,900 HVAC $15,000 to $27.500 0 $0 so $41'500 Electrical $6111,001) $737,000 $50,000 $130,000 $225.000 0 $1,20Z000 Earthwork $50,001) $563,327 to $72,730, SO 5750 322 $1.436,379 Parkinci Lot so so S0 $0 $57,710, $57,710 Access Rnarl so $D $0 0 to $162,171 5162 171 Site Concrete so 0 t0 0 to $115,000 $115 000 Fire Pit 0 $0 $0 0 $0 $52.Q00 S 000 Relaln Wags 0 $0 $0 0 0 S397,320 1397,320 tandscapIng & Irrigation 0 $75,000 SO 40 so $0 $75.000 Site Utilities 0 S1138,2911 so 0 0 $0 $188,294 Site Fence .0 so so $28.950 128,950 Final Cleaning 500 S_0 $2.500 0 " -- - - ' - - "SO $5000 General Conditlons $25 S186M $3,833 $26,471 $79,657 $66,254 $387,932 General LWAW Insurance ..$6 202 $47,572 $2,173 $6,661 $16,519 116,297 595.424 Builders Risk Insurance $301 t2,015 $105 $614 . 5801 $790 tj,626 Building Pemt 16,2B9 154 --$2,203 size3e $16,751 $M526 $96,761 Band SittrtotrG .- ;63 982 .242,917' 5221;746 $1292,207 $1685993' - $1663340 , $9,739j1W Con $31649 $212146 $11,087 $64.610 84300' 83167 486959 Contractors Fee $0 so 0 $D $0. $0 $0 Total Cons bucYWnCost $664,632 $4455,062- - -$23 $1,356,818. $1,770,293. 1,746,507- $10226145 TOtarWntgpBUr Lb,ufOUt i OL7,uuu i 4, -,uuu � 9],Jjuu y y/ »luu i Z,JLYUUV � 4. "Za/ 'OYu ......., nntan a nzriaa 1 x5de7 a .7W j,03 ,ece Snir e n ieX cnfi a i, 7"iiwEf CM Fee 2.85% $291,445 Sall Borings Allowance $15,000 Dome FFE Allowance 000 Building FFE Allowance $20,000 Technology Allowance !1100,000 Utility Relocation Allowance $100.000 5A AC Allowance $15,000 Watershed Allowance $3,000 SubAvd10wnerCosls ._ ... _ __...... . -.. ..- -- 641,445 D"190 Fees Arch. Design Fees 7.40% $756,735 ?frM2la7.ft -F&H FeBS _ Conlin Owner Contingency 4.00% U4.8504017 Desi n Conlin en 4.00% Subtofa7COnErn9en - - -- ". ..---- __..__.. _ - __. -- _. -- l MINNEAPOLIS / PHOENIX / DENVER coNSTRUETION October 8, 2013 Project Estimate `1 October 8, 2013 Edina Sports Dome, Outdoor Ice Sheet and Interior Renovation of East Arena Dome Layout (250' x 400' Dome) Dome foundations Dome (250'x 400') Synthetic turf field (Includes soil prep) Site hardscapes Mechanical/Electrical Landscaping Retaining walls Utilities Earthwork Accessory Building Storage and maintenance buildings Construction Contingency Outdoor Ice Sheet Earthwork Retaining walls Utilities Demo existing East Rink refrigeration system New indirect ammonia refrigeration system Concrete footing around rink Concrete paving around rink Outdoor concrete rink floor with subfloor heating system Exterior dasher boards with full boxes and glass Roof structure w/ fabric roof Covered walk -way w/ fabric roof Walk off mats Construction Contingency Interior Renovation of East Arena Quantities Quantities Cost/Unit Total 1,300 LF $250 $324,000 100,000 SF $13.50 $1,350,000 1 LS $926,000 $926,000 1 LS $120,000 $120,000 100,000 SF $4 $400,000 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 1 LS $80,000 $80,000 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 1 LS $650,000 $650,000 2,500 SF $250 $625,000 2,500 SF $100 $250,000 5% $243,000 Total $5,108,000 Quantities Cost/Unit Total 40,000 SF $5 $200,000 170 LF $650 $110,500 40,000 SF $4 $160,000 I LS $20,000 $20,000 1 LS $725,000 $725,000 1 LS $22,000 $22,000 6,600 SF $5 $33,000 1 LS $375,000 $375,000 1 LS $160,000 $160,000 24,200 SF $28 $677,600 2,500 SF $80 $200,000 2,500 SF $22 $551000 5% $137,000 Total $2,875,100 !/! 701 UJash'inrion Avenue Nor h 0 I linneapolis, Minnesota 55 101 9 2 837.6600 RI L-Onstruction.eom Quantities Demolition 2,500 SF $25. $62,500 Locker /Changing Rooms (2) - renovation 1,800 SF $60 $108,000 ADA compliant restrooms (2) 2 EA $40,000 $80,000 Structural reinforcing 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 Equipment room renovation 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 Walk off mats 1,000 SF $22 $22,000 Construction Contingency 5% $23,000 !/! 701 UJash'inrion Avenue Nor h 0 I linneapolis, Minnesota 55 101 9 2 837.6600 RI L-Onstruction.eom Edina Sports Dome, Outdoor ice Sheet and Interior Renovation of East Arena Owner- Costs The project estimates provided are based on conceptual development of facility size, components and location on site. The values that have been established are conceptual in nature, providing anticipated magnitude of costs based on historical construction cost information from previous facilities. Upon final design, bids will be received for all areas of work that will at that time provide more detailed and accurate construction costs. Quantities Cost/Unit Total A/E Fees 7.4% LS $627,000 CM Fee 2.85% LS $242,000 Soil Borings (Allowance) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Dome FFE (Allowance) 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 Building FFE (Allowance) 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 Technology (Allowance) 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 Utility Relocation (Allowance) 1 LS $100,000 $100,000 SAC /WAC (Allowance) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 Watershed (Allowance) 1 LS $3,000 $3,000 Owner Contingency 4% $339,000 Design Contingency 4% $339,000 Total $1,900,000 Total $10,378,600 The project estimates provided are based on conceptual development of facility size, components and location on site. The values that have been established are conceptual in nature, providing anticipated magnitude of costs based on historical construction cost information from previous facilities. Upon final design, bids will be received for all areas of work that will at that time provide more detailed and accurate construction costs. Prelim, J- n, ary Construction Schedule. Line Name Durdon start Finish 2014 2015 ICI Feb Mar May Im Id Aug Sep Od Nov Dec ]an F 203 173 -17 3114 28 12 26 9 237 214 181 15 29 13 27 10.14 3 22,5 192 A i'll ice SD D6 DESIGN; I 2 SCHEMATIC DESIGN 7d 10014 111011014 n SCHEMATIC DESIGN 3 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 23d 111312014 21I2014i DESIGN Dpa4MENT 4 B 1 -P, 749 � U i f F 'ED PAMGE I 5 BP i DOCUMENTS 30d 211312014 =014 i r7 x ^-. -` BP 1 DOCUMENTS R 6 7 9576 BUDGET ESTIMATE 8d 212712014 311012014 3110014 3110I2014 I MM IiIDW ESTIMATE I 95% BUDGET REVIEW 8 AUTHORIZE BP I BID 3111014 311112014 ® Avr6m BP i BID 0 BP 1 BID ADVERTISEMENT 10d 311212014 30014 i i OT BID ADVIRTISERENT 10 11 BP 1 ISSUE BP 1 BIDDING 3=014 312712014 312612014 41942014 BP 1 1%Uk 10d 1 1 BP I BIDDING I I I I I I I 12 OP 1 BIDS DUE 4110)2014 411012014 SIP I'MDS DUE! 13 8d 411112014 4=014 OP I ED REVIEW 14 LBPIBIDIREVIEW BP1 C BP 1 COUNCIL APPROVAL 4=14 4=14 0 BP I COUNCIL APPROVAL IND PACIE4GE 2 16 BP 2 DOCUMENTS 58d 211312014 5150114 '-_p BP 2 DOC'LlMeff I I I i I I I I ----------- 17 9596 BUDGET ESTIMATE 12d 3131014 4115014 18 95% BUDGET REVIEW 4115014 4=14 41152014 40014 954 BUDGET REVIEW AUTHORIZE SIR 2 BID BP 2 BID ADVERTISEMENT 10dj 4=14, 5152014 CqNSTRUCTION Daft: 2/10/2014 Edina Sports Dome (ESD), Preliminary Construction Schedule 1014 2015 Line Nan Duration Sham Finn )an '-- Feb Mar Apr `May ]w Id Aug Sep Ott Nov Dec ]an F 6 103 113 1131142811269 231 214 181 1529132110 :248 12 5 19 2 21 BP 2 ISSUE 51812014 Y 51612014 I I I $ BP 21SSUE I I I I I 1 ! I 22 BP 2 BI DDI NG 10d 516014 511912014 ! I I j M9 BP 1®DINq I I I I I I I 23 512012014 512012014 I I — ' BP 2 BIDS DUE 24 BP 2 BID REVIEW 8d 5012014 622014 I I I I I ! I I 1 I 1 . � fIP 2 BIDI REVIEW 15 BP 2 COUNCIL APPROVAL 6132014 613/2014 O BP 2 COUNCIL APPROVAL 26 COf�3Y �T�ft�,N° - ; ,t54d 51,1'!30;9, 17J5f 0it' a)NSiR000N I t i ��ROIL ORRECRONS I I I l I I 27 SOIL CORRECTIONS 20d 5/112014 5292014 28 DOME•CONSTRUCTION _ - I ,- pO!eON 29 _ DOME ASPHALT ROADS 20d 9112014 926QD14 1 I I I I ! t ' ' � DOME ASPHALT ROADS 30 DOME TURF 20d 911512014 101102014 —• s pOME1URF , 31 DOME FABRIC 25d 101132014 1111412014 DO�E FABRIC OUTDOOR ICE SHEET ROOF 80d 6113014 1=014 ' W rI)OOR ICE M7 ROOF SiRUC W 1 , 33 ACCESSORY BLDG 1 I I 1 i ` ` ' ` " 't- �" ` AOOMRY BLDG 8W 61132014 10132014 34 TEMP ICE EQUIPMENT — 45d :61302014 91112014 I 1 �"—TEMP ICE,EQUIPMBtT I I I EAST ARENA ICE EQUIPMENT I I I. I I 1 ._ I EAST ARENA ICE EQ!l1PMwr I I 35 55d 71712014 91192014 36 EAST ARENA INTERIOR RENOVATION 55d 7172014 91192014 ! I I I I I I �� FAST ARENA UMMOR RENOVATION I 37 PARKING LOT ASPHALT TRAILS 19d 9232014 1011712014 I I 1 I I t t ! o PARIONG LOT ASPHALT TRAILS 1 36 SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION .1111712014 111172014 1 - I._ -- _ - L_— _.I -_ .__. � . - _ � _ —_..T_ ___!_� , . � � i—„ ' • . SUBSTANI7AL COMPLE!ION 39 FINAL COMPLETION . 121512014 12152014. bFINALCOMPIEIION - - - - — - B, � I] Date: 2/10/2014 Edina Sports Dome (ESD) COMSTRUMON Preliminary Construction Schedule - I - - - - w •4�� j OL .r'. i�� !r i�i�IW r1 *'.i ,k*�r '� * • iF rJ .�• `r�• �'a i. ,(!:, • J� — t i L y, >r _ f T _ ' (Dxr+'��n•'•,.(�`}je A ' , - � +� �,, � J }t ' 7f ,1 °v i•j "' � �''! F '1' Lt4'�Y . . - � Y 1 N� 1•., � f - '� i � Y t , ` tl t• •` PROPOSED _- IMPROVED P ! n I ti* u �C;fi i i; r SAND PEAT VIRONMENTAL,- , .� GRASS = ) TRAIL h8o'x360' ,' _ ,!• . y; E _ '. ir ~ "� _ ti f t •., •� ? A i Y It � �.: �! PAVE : - a 5j THETIC TURF � I nd TREAT b � r .'r 1 r, . �. ;i , .: ,. • , t ii �M I A jgLETIC FIELD E F N EXTEND \ ccer - 240' x 330! ENVIRONMENTAL` rz� II ! FLOOD PLATL PAVED TRAIL" 1 !' y I,.. ISO —" - -- -- — XIFtiN -- GG s I �.. J . �%uth soccer - i50 -x 74 ', -- — - -- - "iRAIC TO .' _ �fo II 60' �.. a- PARKING SHELTER BUILDING -,- - u x 360 �: ++ LOT r..• r. tba 58th ST - s EXPANSION & i_ �•- EXPANSION l d IMPROVEMENTS -�' MN d 1 i . ....wry... Ili_ l 1 I" •fir 1i fi a F. r PAVED TRAIL •li ,1 rp y - ._ ___ -^4 "' •' - '�-' tltl ' - 1/t 1d. 4 \ REGRADED � X i. [tp'• 1 r NQR H DRI +7� r` t3 1 ! 1 GRASS FIELD 8' WIDE :NE Gjii 8 8 TT N TH RISEN I I t (300' x 160.) �^^ff AN IV- P L SIO y r•r —ter' I 4�►". r ✓ ___ �; T f Ej PAVED TRAIL Ile 8' WIDE - L , F . , I Il t } �yu n. .• rs • " , .'.� ST PARKING LOT ^' - - -- ` � t •� i�isl:ar- + �l i ? c g�.r ..�'�ra s R- � � - I _ l+ - -.•- '71 LOW RETAINING EXPANSION STALLS) - J ` Updated Pamela Site Plan [Lam.T / R : C®MM i�NDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII.D. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action 0 Discussion ❑. Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Final Plat, Development Contract & Preservation Easement — Acres Dubois, Frank Sidell, Property Located Between Little Street And Morningside Road, Resolution No. 2014 -20 Action Requested: Adopt the attached Resolution approving the Final Plat; and approve the Development Contract and Tree and Slope Preservation Easement. Information / Background: On April 15, 2013, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat. The Final Plat is the same as the approved Preliminary Plat. Drainage and utility easements have been expanded to accommodate an updated stormwater management system. The new system. will include an underground infiltration system that will be designed to infiltrate all storms up to the 100 year event. It will be located in the area of the new cul -de -sac, upstream of the existing landlocked low area in the northwest area of the site. This new underground infiltration system will better protect the existing low areas and reduce impacts to the "adjacent neighbors. This system has been reviewed and approved by the city engineer. ATTACHMENTS: o Preliminary & Final Plats o City Council Minutes April 15, 2013 e . Development Contract o Tree and Slope Preservation Easement o Resolution 2014 -20 City of Edina •. 4801 W. 50`h St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 APPROVING A FINAL PLAT FOR ACRES DUBOIS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Mr. Frank Sidell, Sidell is requesting a Final Plat for an eight lot subdivision. 1.02 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lots 1 -8, Block 1, Acres Dubois Edina, Minnesota 1.03 On April 15, 2013, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat and the following Variances: 1. Lot depth variances from 161 feet to 130 feet for Lot 4; to 140 feet for Lot 6 and to 135 feet for Lot 7. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed Final Plat is the same as the approved Preliminary Plat, with drainage and utility easements becoming larger in some areas, to accommodate drainage. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Plat for the proposed subdivision, Acres Dubois. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Park dedication fee of $10,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following items must be submitted: CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 wwwEdinaMN.gov o 952 - 927 -8861 a Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 Page Two a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for .the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. d. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. e. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. L The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The. configuration. shall be subject to approval of the Director of Engineering. g. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. Adopted this 18th day of February, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor • RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014. City Clerk I I I I I I I I _ CO" I I I I I I corn I .. I I I I eo" � n.' I nr. I' su. I Sao Lilt a0 iu► a °v08 301SONIMOV4 -------------- VNlm F — XHVd SIMI IS �09 ON dall 7 CE MOa ,05 VIGIL_-3SV3 ,Ol y , ` _ .port I 953 ,0£ s 133ill5 BSS ,Sl I=9=r — m I I I L---- - - - - -- I ° OI I es i s z1 to p - -- "D.1 L - - - J• - I J1 J • YZI � I=t I> • . to I I t1=r Z_-- - - - - -. zY=Y 1 4 - - -_ - -I I O D I O 91'9 °d /N - D z Ni �s£1ZL m,. m N,I to I m 9Yir I 99zr u_ Y n 6f 101 I ----- - - -- -- (7hq G3 °� • 7p1) 11 � ` I�' I I S9zr 'M9tl Pr -------- - - - - -- 9tzr moaa.o e`/ N, vim\ J G----- - - - - -- Sh 03 I\ I 19zr r"---- - - - - -- Syr I I �\ LS[r - - -_ to I I �' es 9•a1 a\ \ \I' I— — — — — — — — — — —.�. —. —• y15N93 33NL X — I 1 � -- — � - - - - --� 3s+1�9GL I sszr ILUb ' 1 ' m •nsNO3 7 o OLL'Zl >I �,,, LI ua3aotla •Ln' — ml $ of I o� / — "oa-N tczr ° I ,. b' IzLr •3 / d569Z'4Z g € to •N; � I Im g > of NI I Im 133NIS 131111 I A '1S Z /L.Z4 GFis J I N9tl M emr iris O Vie. i 1rn 9n. 9 I _ Mn e '-,l I ' T 91L. s '3 lYl- - - -- '�i---- - - - - -- c — — — — — — — — — — j c' I rzzr - I N I I ? �� PRELIMINARY PLAT 'ta"'°° °mot °qr^' B " — N " 1 om a�. t P„ and s Terra 6 wh Lcm°w V ! d o N Dor't:. a °.... w m. <° s : .... E•eg... �n61ne ootl Avenue ACRES DUBOIS „.x k I k 6001 Glenw EDINA, MN Minneapolis , Minnesota 5C 22 5 :51ace. Nw 11e44 763593932 Fu763520 717 a ACRES BUBOIS I. S� 5 _=.Z-5 2 J L NO SCALE BING 10 FEET M M AND ADJO G MW—OF—MY I1NE5 AW BEND 5 = . MM AND AD MQ WT UNES. MESS OTIFAML4 SM0 W TKE PLAT. f-1 1/2 pp• mlm tnanw new. - I D— 1/2 .. 6V 14 YM1 b. martb by L.S. Na X655. DEnlvulNn wow blIl 'Ul�'S Kf=ENT MgDd =E mm. NORTH IM — D 0 Lot K 4 O. 'OROOtOt At CROWELL'S ADDI OW. W w W hm I b*IMg If S 0 again 25 mYw 34 weL11LS toWL A7= 7-7-ril R•Vwr 0 eir- 0 ANN=PFM F►► ----------------- - LAmv — — ------- - ---------------- soow"m 6 �OUTLOT Slow I TRAIL. T 1 19 2 ".00 19 F cD A. �' q X jl %......... ,. All 5a > r.&VACLA r- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — s000mm — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - I. S� 5 _=.Z-5 2 J L NO SCALE BING 10 FEET M M AND ADJO G MW—OF—MY I1NE5 AW BEND 5 = . MM AND AD MQ WT UNES. MESS OTIFAML4 SM0 W TKE PLAT. f-1 1/2 pp• mlm tnanw new. - I D— 1/2 .. 6V 14 YM1 b. martb by L.S. Na X655. DEnlvulNn wow blIl 'Ul�'S Kf=ENT MgDd =E mm. NORTH IM — D 0 Lot K 4 O. 'OROOtOt At CROWELL'S ADDI OW. W w W hm I b*IMg If S 0 again 25 mYw 34 weL11LS toWL A7= 7-7-ril R•Vwr 0 eir- 0 ANN=PFM F►► BJ$IS L dD L 1$18 I1 Or9Aamw awl swotl '+oP1euV3 'd •NW A4 —01 le Am — 941 •w Paw9 p.6PeVaolq,o Se. Iwwwwul vl,t 30 A1N110] 1110534414 A 311115 SS9•• agu.Yp Sc1POw'd I- aAe++ns pw1 v2wm •apwi45 'd oP11Sq OZ 10 APO — 9111 Pella 1pp 941 w Y.POOI Pw u.o4v m do. OPged PP Iw Ind 941 w wPVPI pw. Vww 1owNaaa 9wpw aop e1n w o T roPls '195os Plow vSm S oPo— 4 p.Wp o ropin I•. Ile Iw1.ag mI.. p Pm •vod • WIP 1 RNSS+oP w 0. a'w•0 —M POP 9w w IelOPoi, nwwnu Mo 1 41 nPp 941 w IS1eASMI Alla•+a4 m •Swl Pw owV Pa!PUWIOw P loN X..— 1ap,po e41 to Monolua2aAa+ —0 P q I.,. o w1$ aV1 4 O,(w115 Rol Pft I App o ve 1 Pitt wevlaNS I,S,IO A. apes w •w Ag Re 1a "Sold 9Y1 JIM, 4!44IAga+a4nSP appu45 'd P.4SI 'I wlu!wwe0 AN OIOSSVN% xlum0 ',INOd Aw1oN Y/n 1 UPP1S l' •VI 041 SO nAWL 'WO5 V 2111 44 _OZ ;1 App — e144 ew eal•g P•6wPPwao iu Iwwnali pyyl N o uNro] r10531Mpa A 31r15 Z10Z 161 —PIS pPlpp V/n L PIS Y 41 ail to PSPwl 'ISIS I v,+I V33NO6 —qz e Aop 9N P1mV W in dlwaa4 20y ilpL '9l apwld.5 w1eD Y/n ivO+l wP5 Y OW e4 l0 aawwl 'ISP5 Y M Pwe lames e N .,I .. wSS11Vm] An 1 .n 'AwmJ .land RaloN wsad x16,. a 'unj, 3 wa] AM —0Z p Aop — ,il ITV ml Pp R6paPO,pe vow Iw , I!, - x uNrlu]. VIOUNWn d0 31V1S POPS 3 MOO] 1113405 —OL 0 A -1 — 9111 I— a4 in o)woa4 SO4 'woad -Soup o 'PPS 3 Pa] %w IPSaV• mull. u1 lop •!111 w 1+S0w So Olwue•e• 11!wn Pw ISO— Ile A. a!gpW I% a•ol So. Wgdd Ot wgOd OO ol.• onp Agm4 op p 909n0 S3tl]Y SP RN.ld Pw PSS• S Sit el aum no Pow, SaoN T 40® '91 lol peso A -Ma VWU Pit Pw C 4019 YI ISl PP& P SW ilm .41 to 11 0 •wn A��Pa. 141 w..W 64(I •OwtY Sao, RP_ to I- PVl OnV ro)oaauu!N Ales.] NdauuaH '.V "R, lull .,IP.Op q a4orJ L 40!9 '91 1T ONV ro1PnuNn Alum] YdauwN :1e11PiV Iv! c,Pa.u] q a4eq Y 4019 sl 101 0M' rola2 ,ry xlumJ NdauwH -u MR, legl aASOSq q aSOe T 4041'.1 Pl Aladold pag!axaO 6N.Pwl Pit, to awo iIOZ '61 aOwSldaS Polop Y/n Po+l II— Y aPl 541 w e P1Yy So 1PP5 r 21+1 loot 0HV '.wnPor I— •AO q a40q. T 1PS19 N w Tst 101 Pin 10 nNl 41m9 Puo 41x4 SMI P 11 S Su9c11»4 - —Int 6uy!1 e V ISaM IS— 6NNP!10 Stn w I+Od loot 6l wl to Awlo•M m w S4 Pw at 101 P,• to no 4 e41 P 11 man iuo!S OS c a4 —So 641(1 vO Y 1, Peso r 14M P , - :,o!w .w to lad le4t qV •yl ae el Plaapu nue4mN 6,•11 •.!I PP.) On— nme __N .41 woo Vlms 1..1 SZ59 1wP!O 91 lol P... 10 541 P.M SMI w luwd o 01 IwaV1 aua,- ISOay4oN VI —4 — Pit LE-99 ] PP 91 191 PP- P au!1 Ico3 wl w IN. o woo u.O+D SW S to AImV1aN Cult, at I.. to I+od 1.. :1 ad uNn •PP6NweN wewNNea1-.4 ! wSSV4K 'I 499 '9 Pl w 2x41 PAM P_ -3 - 10 11 Sw+ W u.•.Iw 60(1 balmw(-PpV PuZ 1.1101-H .PpPOOM w lop ew w wow) ISSAS PINT to lad loVl r1 ad ONV uw'DPr iu! •,W J q nM9. T 4oIB N PV 5l Io' %e2 to — , Sw we4 ISSN, Pal 0I Iw Y 11.1. poO w S,od o al 'It Sol qw to nuaa 1SwVlmS •Yl uw4 1vOM 1••I 0'99 1w1eP 'LL ael P!oe to •NI 41m5 Wl w luwd a Vogl lu.e+O •NI o to leo3 6u1(I III •ul.1 w uala, I... .`P.M fi4•g •W nee 'tOS+P41 +P4aa P.w_ wl wII VImS 119 W`99 W 0D 51 lol pl4 to PNI 1 PV 1416* o of 'p uoa t :41 eN x41 m4 ilm5 tul LZ'99 1wI9P bl lal Plos to x41 12.3 04 w Iwd o woo u.oa Bull o I IYImS fiultl '9l lal Iollad 1010 :LI a- a- '.Y •Nl. Plos IS I-Sont wSw111O 541 Ow 'Lt 101 Rn to •W Vlms SVI P.H _- —M.. a .w we.wg fiu%1 :wl R 1Sy •A••O9 q 6469. 'C 4019 6, q! bar 1•.M Wlwou Sp P lad 0. Pw 51 101 noa P ou 203 • wo4 1WA Pal 059 I—P '.V -1. OP• w Ito- I I 'LI lol PPO to IS— I...VIm -41 Poll 1-- l..l 0'99 IVPPp 'LI III D mS 1 luwd o —1 w o 10 1... UK, I, . I- :, a.o+] y aw4o J. T 4019 ul M. w!1.. ol'. vluya I -O 4 6yao •YII PIPS !Spoil a —4 i100 PIS 9 Iw P '91 lol PP. w .41 I..M P pod o am 1 N e4 w04 411109 Iwl LZ'99 IwivP �91 1O11P!w to SNI Iw3 .w w luwd S uSwl Y.m SNI S P 4m5 fiu!AI el 191 to Iad PVl Lt 0., puPl _.P fiwowl eN 10 100 1041 Atama wva.an 6NUIP1 x41 to awe loco* ol6us o ' ISPSS 3 Pa] 104 51113S31fd 353H1 A9 5N0503d 1111 MON. : S10800 SUN AlOdaO AB np—a Al.— ;Mw . 4WN �OZ to Aop 941 wUi. 94 N Pepaaa me S09n0 S3 to told 4411. Wl Pilml!laa A—M . I. pwouNry MI N OMMS. 'tl3010J3tl A1N,w Al0de9 A9 Sono w x496.9 'm4 . 4tnn X02 " w lop — SP0 =up 9111 1! wm o. 909n0 smpr IP Pp 4wP OO I.. Am— 1gaa4 I opoo.,. 'AI-0 ul .a ,, 'ST10 D 0Y9151030 19 aeRV.+11S Alum] —ie 'd Moo — —OZ po Aop — St. pwe+ddo no Sw lop SIYI '(fi981) 59G'8CB[ 'n 'lrls 1Y11 01 Iw11md -Poo n xlun ME-14 'N05MIO 111I5 AtndaO 19 al'O0r Alum] 'uPOVJ 'A 4on COL lo, Aop — 9111 PSIOP lees O!YI w R%.p Pw1 SM 01 Rid u••g peV •a.( +q+d Ro —o, 4 eRM.d wa1 Pit 110aa 1g 4 I - I in %l 3 4d000N '1N3n1NYd30 530Ntl35 9UY-1 - a6uw. A4 _n 19 - Plocw4N rouP3 to 110 'a— 110 ...... 1 PIP wvd.P 2011 'Z 'pgOS '[0'605 -11.5 -1'1 il - 1.SauNh AM PI 11 YwNOPwwwoau Pw Slwwweo Yana to Oo,- AOpaOCw,.FS9ovud • 1 +e A'1 Mi Ao. Pecwae+ P or. ao40u3 Awo6iN Alum] ool Puo wllo Wueay S�OZ - .wmN 6Y �<IMP+ - 4 a IS ePSau4N rou p e • uawm 111+• WI bwea!pdP 1. IS Aop — ROM uP3Vle [10 •h P 1u 0 A10 •1n Ag Rift'" Pw P -IMPOO .d SIU9n0 5310r IS top q% - 1mu4N bu1P3 to AID 1 ounco A10 ugqu+wm A. OPCUNn %1um0 allgnd AaIIN '+oP1euV3 'd •NW A4 —01 le Am — 941 •w Paw9 p.6PeVaolq,o Se. Iwwwwul vl,t 30 A1N110] 1110534414 A 311115 SS9•• agu.Yp Sc1POw'd I- aAe++ns pw1 v2wm •apwi45 'd oP11Sq OZ 10 APO — 9111 Pella 1pp 941 w Y.POOI Pw u.o4v m do. OPged PP Iw Ind 941 w wPVPI pw. Vww 1owNaaa 9wpw aop e1n w o T roPls '195os Plow vSm S oPo— 4 p.Wp o ropin I•. Ile Iw1.ag mI.. p Pm •vod • WIP 1 RNSS+oP w 0. a'w•0 —M POP 9w w IelOPoi, nwwnu Mo 1 41 nPp 941 w IS1eASMI Alla•+a4 m •Swl Pw owV Pa!PUWIOw P loN X..— 1ap,po e41 to Monolua2aAa+ —0 P q I.,. o w1$ aV1 4 O,(w115 Rol Pft I App o ve 1 Pitt wevlaNS I,S,IO A. apes w •w Ag Re 1a "Sold 9Y1 JIM, 4!44IAga+a4nSP appu45 'd P.4SI 'I wlu!wwe0 AN OIOSSVN% xlum0 ',INOd Aw1oN Y/n 1 UPP1S l' •VI 041 SO nAWL 'WO5 V 2111 44 _OZ ;1 App — e144 ew eal•g P•6wPPwao iu Iwwnali pyyl N o uNro] r10531Mpa A 31r15 Z10Z 161 —PIS pPlpp V/n L PIS Y 41 ail to PSPwl 'ISIS I v,+I V33NO6 —qz e Aop 9N P1mV W in dlwaa4 20y ilpL '9l apwld.5 w1eD Y/n ivO+l wP5 Y OW e4 l0 aawwl 'ISP5 Y M Pwe lames e N .,I .. wSS11Vm] An 1 .n 'AwmJ .land RaloN wsad x16,. a 'unj, 3 wa] AM —0Z p Aop — ,il ITV ml Pp R6paPO,pe vow Iw , I!, - x uNrlu]. VIOUNWn d0 31V1S POPS 3 MOO] 1113405 —OL 0 A -1 — 9111 I— a4 in o)woa4 SO4 'woad -Soup o 'PPS 3 Pa] %w IPSaV• mull. u1 lop •!111 w 1+S0w So Olwue•e• 11!wn Pw ISO— Ile A. a!gpW I% a•ol So. Wgdd Ot wgOd OO ol.• onp Agm4 op p 909n0 S3tl]Y SP RN.ld Pw PSS• S Sit el aum no Pow, SaoN T 40® '91 lol peso A -Ma VWU Pit Pw C 4019 YI ISl PP& P SW ilm .41 to 11 0 •wn A��Pa. 141 w..W 64(I •OwtY Sao, RP_ to I- PVl OnV ro)oaauu!N Ales.] NdauuaH '.V "R, lull .,IP.Op q a4orJ L 40!9 '91 1T ONV ro1PnuNn Alum] YdauwN :1e11PiV Iv! c,Pa.u] q a4eq Y 4019 sl 101 0M' rola2 ,ry xlumJ NdauwH -u MR, legl aASOSq q aSOe T 4041'.1 Pl Aladold pag!axaO 6N.Pwl Pit, to awo iIOZ '61 aOwSldaS Polop Y/n Po+l II— Y aPl 541 w e P1Yy So 1PP5 r 21+1 loot 0HV '.wnPor I— •AO q a40q. T 1PS19 N w Tst 101 Pin 10 nNl 41m9 Puo 41x4 SMI P 11 S Su9c11»4 - —Int 6uy!1 e V ISaM IS— 6NNP!10 Stn w I+Od loot 6l wl to Awlo•M m w S4 Pw at 101 P,• to no 4 e41 P 11 man iuo!S OS c a4 —So 641(1 vO Y 1, Peso r 14M P , - :,o!w .w to lad le4t qV •yl ae el Plaapu nue4mN 6,•11 •.!I PP.) On— nme __N .41 woo Vlms 1..1 SZ59 1wP!O 91 lol P... 10 541 P.M SMI w luwd o 01 IwaV1 aua,- ISOay4oN VI —4 — Pit LE-99 ] PP 91 191 PP- P au!1 Ico3 wl w IN. o woo u.O+D SW S to AImV1aN Cult, at I.. to I+od 1.. :1 ad uNn •PP6NweN wewNNea1-.4 ! wSSV4K 'I 499 '9 Pl w 2x41 PAM P_ -3 - 10 11 Sw+ W u.•.Iw 60(1 balmw(-PpV PuZ 1.1101-H .PpPOOM w lop ew w wow) ISSAS PINT to lad loVl r1 ad ONV uw'DPr iu! •,W J q nM9. T 4oIB N PV 5l Io' %e2 to — , Sw we4 ISSN, Pal 0I Iw Y 11.1. poO w S,od o al 'It Sol qw to nuaa 1SwVlmS •Yl uw4 1vOM 1••I 0'99 1w1eP 'LL ael P!oe to •NI 41m5 Wl w luwd a Vogl lu.e+O •NI o to leo3 6u1(I III •ul.1 w uala, I... .`P.M fi4•g •W nee 'tOS+P41 +P4aa P.w_ wl wII VImS 119 W`99 W 0D 51 lol pl4 to PNI 1 PV 1416* o of 'p uoa t :41 eN x41 m4 ilm5 tul LZ'99 1wI9P bl lal Plos to x41 12.3 04 w Iwd o woo u.oa Bull o I IYImS fiultl '9l lal Iollad 1010 :LI a- a- '.Y •Nl. Plos IS I-Sont wSw111O 541 Ow 'Lt 101 Rn to •W Vlms SVI P.H _- —M.. a .w we.wg fiu%1 :wl R 1Sy •A••O9 q 6469. 'C 4019 6, q! bar 1•.M Wlwou Sp P lad 0. Pw 51 101 noa P ou 203 • wo4 1WA Pal 059 I—P '.V -1. OP• w Ito- I I 'LI lol PPO to IS— I...VIm -41 Poll 1-- l..l 0'99 IVPPp 'LI III D mS 1 luwd o —1 w o 10 1... UK, I, . I- :, a.o+] y aw4o J. T 4019 ul M. w!1.. ol'. vluya I -O 4 6yao •YII PIPS !Spoil a —4 i100 PIS 9 Iw P '91 lol PP. w .41 I..M P pod o am 1 N e4 w04 411109 Iwl LZ'99 IwivP �91 1O11P!w to SNI Iw3 .w w luwd S uSwl Y.m SNI S P 4m5 fiu!AI el 191 to Iad PVl Lt 0., puPl _.P fiwowl eN 10 100 1041 Atama wva.an 6NUIP1 x41 to awe loco* ol6us o ' ISPSS 3 Pa] 104 51113S31fd 353H1 A9 5N0503d 1111 MON. : S10800 SUN Minutes /Edina Citv Council /April 15, 2013 VI.B. PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH LOT DEPTH VARIANCES, FRANK SIDELL, PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN LITTEL STREET AND MORNINGSIDE ROAD — RESOLUTION 2013 -39 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community- Development Director Teague presented the request of Frank Sidell for an eight -lot subdivision, lot depth variance from 161 feet to 130 feet for Lot 4, to 140 feet for Lot 6, and to 135 feet for Lot 7 for the Sidell family -owned property located between Littel Street and Morningside Road. It was noted the subdivision reflected the preferred option as supported during sketch plan review and incorporated reduced right -of -way from 50 feet to 40 feet and reduced street widths from 28 feet to 24 feet. In addition, the outlot located east of the cul -de -sac had been widened to provide additional separation from the home at 4408 Morningside Road. This outlot would be landscaped then deeded to the adjacent property owner. The driveway leading to 4408 Morningside Road would then be relocated to the new cul -de -sac. Mr. Teague indicated that while the proponent had considered turning Lots 1 and 2 to face Morningside Road, he preferred to integrate these two lots into the cul -de -sac rather than potentially isolating the lots. He stated the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval subject to conditions as revised and detailed in the staff report. The Council asked questions of Mr. Teague and City Attorney Knutson relating to Outlot A, the rain garden, the potential of an additional condition establishing a drainage utility easement, and typical protection strategies included in conservation easements. There was discussion on the potential of revising Condition 2.h to add clarity to the 20 -foot buffer requirements, possibly applying a two- tiered conservation easement with a buffer until such time as the neighborhood was fully developed. Proponent Presentation Frank Sidell, 4232 Oakdale Avenue, provided a presentation of the preliminary site plan for the property located between Littel Street and Morningside Road. He discussed the intent to maintain the uniqueness of the property and make the best use of the natural topography, and commented on the eclectic neighborhood. Mr. Sidell reviewed the following issues that had been addressed in the preliminary site plan: no lots were less than 75 feet wide; a public sidewalk had been incorporated; a traffic study had been completed confirming the cul -de -sac was in the safest location; a rain garden had been incorporated; and, Outlot A would be deeded. Mr. Sidell indicated the following issues remain open and need to be addressed: 1) The family was not in agreement with the tree conservation requirement with the additional 20 -foot buffer. He would like to withdraw this from the plan and proposed that prior to final plat approval, additional discussion occur between his tree expert, the City Arborist, and possibly members of the Council. 2) The family was not in agreement with the fire sprinkler requirement. The City's standard road width was 27 feet, not 30 feet, and houses were currently being built on 24 -foot wide streets that were not required to be sprinkled. 3) The family was not in agreement with the requirement to submit a landscaping plan for the right -of -way. They proposed individual builders landscape as they move forward and the lots develop. The Council discussed the proposed preliminary plat in relation to streetscape and the incorporation of sidewalk. Member Bennett noted that a future sidewalk between Oakdale and Wooddale avenues, the east half of which would be in the City of Edina and the west half of which would be in the City of St. Louis Park, was currently under discussion by Edina and St. Louis Park city staff members. The Council discussed the topography of the land, whether the conservation easement or an alternative tool could be used to accomplish tree and slope preservation goals, which were the basis for the Sidells' requests for lot depth variances and the current code requirements in relation to fire sprinkler installation. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Public Testimony Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 16, 2013 Phil Sidell, 4221 Lynn Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the fire sprinkler requirement included in Condition 2.m. of the preliminary plat in relation to consistency with requirements of other developments and road width of 24 feet versus 27 feet and 30 feet. City Attorney Knutson and Fire Marshal Siems advised the Council on current code requirements for residential fire sprinkler installation. Mr. Siems stated that while there were currently roads in the City that were 24 feet wide; the fundamental difference in this _situation was that the proposed road was a cul -de -sac and not a through street. He stressed the opportunity to avert potential disaster, and that residential fire sprinklers saved lives. Mr. Siems stated that in the event of a residential fire, there was a much higher collapse rate with lighter- weight materials used in new home construction. He stated in accordance with the Minnesota State Fire Code, the City had the authority to; request alternative designs, which in this situation would be to supply resident fire sprinklers within:this area. The Council discussed the tree and slope conservation easement included in Condition 2.h. of the preliminary plat in relation to the conservation easement to be drafted in a manner that protected trees while allowing use in the area. Elements to consider in drafting the conservation easement would be to protect trees and other conifer material along the west area behind Lots 1 -4, and to protect the steep slope and mature trees off Lots 5 and 6. Mr. Teague stated that the preliminary plat could be approved subject to a conservation easement being approved with the final plat. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2013 -39, approving a Preliminary Plat with Lot Depth Variances at 4212 Morningside Road 4232 Littel Street, based on the following findings: 1. The applicant has submitted a subdivision of the property that would meet all minimum zoning district requirements with eight lots and new through street that would connect Morningside Road and Littel Street. 2. Rather, than develop the site per all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements, the applicant has submitted a proposed subdivision of the property with a cul -de -sac, which requires lot depth variances for Lots 4, 6, and 7. 3. The proposed subdivision with the three lot depth variances would preserve the steep slopes on the site, and preserves 50 mature trees by placing them in a conservation easement. 4. The proposed subdivision still has eight lots. 5. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 6. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a practical difficulty to the property caused by the existing steep slopes and mature trees on the property. b. The requested variance_ s are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lots are larger in size than the median, and there are 26 lots within 500 feet of the property that do not have lot depths greater than 130 feet, which is the shallowest of the three lots that require lot depth variances. c. The variance request is reasonable, as subdivision still contains eight lots, which would be allowed with the Code compliant subdivision; however, it protects steep slopes and 50 mature trees. d. If the variances were denied, the applicant could still subdivide the property into eight lots; however, the. steep slopes would be disturbed and an additional 42 mature trees would be removed. And subject to the following conditions: Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /April 15, 2013 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to release of the final plat, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the Districts requirements. b. Enter into a Developers Agreement with the City. The Developers Agreement shall include the requirement for construction of the sidewalk as proposed. c. Pay the park dedication fee of $10,000. d. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. e. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the Director of Engineering's memo dated March 22, 2013. f. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. g. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. h. Establishment of a tree and slope conservation easement as demonstrated on the grading and tree preservation plan. Approval of a conservation easement with the final plat. I. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. j. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration shall be subject to approval of the Director of Engineering. k. A stop sign is required to be installed on the new street approaching Morningside Road. Clear sight lines shall be maintained from the intersection. I. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. m. The new road shall be built to the City standards, including a 27 -foot width. n. Signage stating "No Parking Fire Lane" along one side of the roadway the entire length of the road. o. Installation of fire hydrant(s) near end of cul -de -sac, and possibly at intersection of Morningside. Fire hydrant location is subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. p. Submittal of a landscape plan showing trees in the right -of -way. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIM REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, PRELIMINARY REZONING TO PUD, PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT, HUNT ASSOCIATES 5109 — 5125 WEST 49TH STREET — RESOLUTION NO. 2013-33 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2013-37 ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Mr. Teague advised the proponent had submitted revised plans based on the Council's comments at the April 2, 2013, meeting. The revised plans removed one unit, increased the northeast setback from 15 feet to 42 feet, increased the setback on 49`h Street to 36 feet, added sidewalk on 49`h Street, provided additional greenspace, implemented a one -way drive with additional drive and curb cut (trash truck access) and added three guest parking spaces. Proponent Presentation Page 5 (reserved for recording information) DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT ACRES DUBOIS ADDITION CONTRACT dated , 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and M -K HOLDINGS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the "Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR PLAT APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a plat for the Acres DuBois Addition (referred to in this Contract as the "plat"). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described as: 2. CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it at the time of application for the initial grading permit, and record the plat with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within one (1) year after the City Council approves the final plat. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. Unless separate written approval has been given bythe City, as evidenced by grading, utility or building permits or other written authorization to proceed, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been 1 172823 A-2 1 satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City's Community Development Director has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. 4. CHANGES IN OFFICIAL CONTROLS. For.five (5) years from the date of this Contract, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved final plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developer. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Contract to the contrary, and not in conflict with any portion of the development already completed or under construction, to the full extent permitted by state law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Contract. 5. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A — Final Plat Plan B —Acres DuBois Preliminary Plan Set Plan C — Final Construction Plans and Specifications 6. IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AND PAID FOR BY DEVELOPER. The Developer shall construct and pay 100% of the cost of the following improvements in accordance with the development plans: A. Sanitary Sewer System B. Water System C. Storm Sewer System D. Streets 1 172823 v42 2 E. Concrete Curb and Gutter F. Landscaping G. Street Lights H. Underground Utilities I. Surveying and Staking J. Site Grading, Stormwater Treatment/infiltration Basins, and Erosion Control K; Sidewalks L. Setting of Iron Monuments 7. DEVELOPER CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENT. Improvements required by this Contract to be constructed by the Developer shall be installed in accordance with plans approved by the City and in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, regulations and policies. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a. competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct -is engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved.City standards as a condition of City acceptance, as stated in Section 9, Engineers Record Drawings. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City's inspectors and engineers. The Developer's engineer shall provide, for on -site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and. contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule pre - construction meetings as necessary to coordinate the work and to allow the City to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in good and workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No material deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance 1 172823 42. 3 of the work required by the Contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Contract, for which reimbursement is expected,from the City, unless such work is first ordered in writing by the City Engineer as provided in the specifications. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02, the final placement of iron monuments for all lot corners must be completed before the applicable security is released. The Developer's surveyor shall also submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments have been installed following site grading, utility and street.construction. 8., CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION/ CONSTRUCTION COSTS. The Developer shall pay a fee for in -house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. The Developer shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's in -house engineering staff or consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed public utilities and street construction and will be billed on hourly rates The—Developer improvements cost breakdown is: o Street Construction $171,005 o Site Grading $162,000 • Storm Sewer $125,200 • Sanitary Sewer $ 81,225 o Watermain $ Estimated Construction Cost $582,510 Estimated "City Engineering Fees (6 %): $34,951 Total Estimated Construction Cost 1 172823 A-2 4 9. ENGINEERS RECORD DRAWINGS. The Developer's engineer shall prepare a set of reproducible record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing requirements, attached hereto as Exhibit "A," showing those approved changes made during the construction process, based on the marked up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to the Developer's Engineer. The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building 10. CONTRACTORS /SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and'corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a twenty -five percent (25 %) ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 6 above. 11. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits or as needed, including but not limited to: A. Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains B. MPCA NPDES Permit for Construction Activity C. MPCA for Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal D. City of Edina for Building Permits E. MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections F. Minnehaha Creek for Watershed Permit The City shall provide cooperative assistance in securing permits from other agencies. 12. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements and other work required by this Development Contract by October 31, 2016. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. 1 172823 v42 5 13. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents; employees; officers and contractors a license to enter the plat to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with plat development. 14. GRADING PLAN. The plat shall be graded in accordance with the approved grading drainage and erosion control plan, Plan B ". The plan shall conform to City's Design and Construction Manual. Within.thirty (30) days after completion of the grading, the Developer shall provide the City with a "record" grading plan certified by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. The "record" plan shall contain site grades and field verified elevations of the following: a) cross sections of ponds b) location and elevations along all swales, emergency overflows, wetlands, wetland mitigation areas if any, ditches, locations and dimensions of borrow areas /stockpiles; c), lot corner elevations and house pads; d) top and bottom of retaining walls. 15. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City.. 16. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance until the public streets are accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in streets to prevent the public from traveling on same.and to direct attention to detours. If and when streets become impassable, such streets shall`be barricaded and closed. In the event that any building or residential unit is occupied prior to completing streets, the Developer shall maintain a smooth surface and provide proper surface drainage to insure that the streets are passable to traffic and emergency vehicles. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping streets within and without the plat clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the streets open during the winter months by plowing snow from the streets prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for repairing the streets because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall 172823 A2 6 contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the development. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. The contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the streets and bill the Developer. 17. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within .public easements shall become City property. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: - Contractor's Certificate - Engineer's Certificate - Land Surveyor's Certificate - Developer's Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Contract. All necessary forms will be furnished by the City. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "record" plans, an electronic file of the "record" plans in accordance with the City's Design and Construction Manual. 18. PARK DEDICATION. The property within the Plat has already paid park dedication for 6 lots. The Developer shall make cash contribution of $10,000 to satisfy the City's park dedication requirements, calculated at the rate of $5,000.00 /unit x 2 units. Payment is due at the time prior to City execution of the final plat. 19. BUILDING PERMITS /CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties and the halting of all work in the plat. B. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and 172823 A2. 7 damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer. 20. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Beginning after final 'approval has been granted by the City and except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs,incurred by it or the City including but not limited to legal, engineering and inspection expenses in connection; with the ongoing development of the plat, the enforcement of this Contract, review of construction plans and documents, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the..development of the plat. The City's costs and expenses must be agreed to in writing by the developer before the City starts any work. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including. attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this Contract, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees. D. Each party shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the other for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within sixty (60) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %): per year. E. In addition to the charges referred to.herein, other charges and special assessments may be imposed such as but not limited -to sewer availability charges ( "SAC ") charges and building permit fees. REC fees will not be required due to the developer installing the watermain and sanitary sewer system. 172823 v4-2 8 21. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to plat development: A. Implementation of the comments in the March 22, 2013, (Revised 3 -27 -2013) memorandum from the Director of Engineering to the Community Development Director. B. City of Edina Resolution 2013 -39 C. Developer must provide a tree and slope preservation easement to the City to preserve the steep slopes on the site and the 1.0 mature trees identified in the Preliminary Tree Preservation plan simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. D. Approval by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and compliance with the District's requirements. E. Construction of a 4 foot sidewalk within the right of way on the west side of the i public street to be constructed by Developer. F. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with the overall grading plan and is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. G. Developer shall provide a construction management plan to the City for the overall development of the site at the time of application for the initial grading permit and for each individual home construction prior to issuance of a building permit. H. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer I: Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road simultaneous with the recording of the final plat. J. Developer must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street within the Plat and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road. The configuration is subject to approval of the City engineer. (Letter of Credit) K. Developer must install a stop sign on the new street within the Plat approaching Morningside Road at a location approved by the City Engineer. Clear site lines shall be maintained from the intersection. 172823v42- 9 L. Developer must obtain a license agreement from the "City >for use of Lot 8; B16ck.3, Crocker & Crowell's 1st Addition per the approved grading plan, ( "City Property") which agreement will include a fee for use of the City Property. A restoration plan is required with the license agreement. M. The new roadway within the Plat shall be built to City standards, which-is 2&ft back of curb to back of curb. N. Developer must install signage stating "No'Parking Fire- Lane" along one side of the new road within the Plat the entire length of the road, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. O. Developer shall install fire hydrant(s) near the end of the cul-de -sac and possibly at the intersection of Morningside, subject to review and approval of.the Fire Marshall. P. Developer must remove the existing home on the south side of the proPerty within the Plat and all accessory buildings located within the Plat. Q. Developer shall maintain the storm water features located within the Platted area for a period of three years following final acceptance after construction. After the period of three years it will be the responsibility of the City for maintenance. 22. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells, assigns, transfers or conveys one or more lots, the entire plat, or any part of it. The Developer shall notify the City when it sells, assigns, conveys or transfers any of its rights, title or interest in the site. B. In compliance with the Response Action Plan approved by the MPCA for the property, the developer shall remove and properly dispose of any environmental contamination within the plat. C. Retaining walls that require a building permit shall be constructed in accordance with plans and specifications prepared by a. structural or geotechnical engineer licensed by the State of Minnesota. Following construction, a certification signed by the design engineer shall be filed with the City Engineer evidencing that the retaining wall was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. All retaining walls identified on the development plans or by special conditions referred to in 172823 y4-2 10 this: Contract shall be constructed before any other building permit is issued for a lot on which a retaining wall. is required to be built. D. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until six (6) months after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $1,000,000 for one person and $2,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage at the time of application for the initial grading permit. E. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under,this Contract. F. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the. validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. G. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a,waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. H. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. In the event this Contract is recorded, the City covenants to provide a recordable Certificate of Completion promptly upon the completion of the work required herein. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the property being final platted and /or has obtained consents to this Contract, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property being final platted; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 172823 v42. 11 0 I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied; now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other - right, power or remedy. 23. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In -the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty -eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in.whole or in part: 24. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all public improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to Section 6 of this Contract againstpoor material and faulty workmanshp: The Developer .... Formatted: Not Highlight shall submit either a warranty /maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvements, or a letter of credit for twenty-five percent (25 %) of the amount of the original cost of these improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to street construction, including concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, retaining wails; materials and equipment shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the subdivider. shall guarantee all• work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. 1 172823 x-4-2 12 C. The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is two growing seasons following installation. 25. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Contract by the Developer, payment of the costs of all public improvements to be constructed and paid for by Developer, construction of all public improvements to be constructed by the City and reimbursed by the Developer in whole or part, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ( "security ") for $ 610,461. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City Engineer approval the security may be reduced -from time to time but not more than once every ninety days by ninety percent (90 %) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10 %) of the amounts certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 2 NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing and shall_ be_ either_ hand Formatted: Not Highlight delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 4232 Oakdale Avenue, Edina, Minnesota 55416. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424- 1330. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 172823 A2 13 CITY OF'EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor (SEAL) AND Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before . me this day of , 2014; by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina,. a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. 172823 v42 NOTARY PUBLIC 14 DEVELOPER M -K HOLDINGS, LLC By: Its Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. . COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014, by the Chief Manager of M -K Holdings, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of said company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651 - 452 -5000 1 172823 v4- 15 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FRANKLIN D. SIDELL, II AND CAROL E. SIDELL, husband and wife, fee owners of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by them. Dated this day of 2014. Franklin D. Sidell, II Carol E. Sidell STATE OF MINNESOTA )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by Franklin D. Sidell, II and Carol E. Sidell, husband and wife. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELLKNUTSON. Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651 -452 -5000 172823 v44 16 FEE OWNER CONSENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT IRIS SIDELL TRUST U/A DATED AUGUST 21, 2012 fee owner of all or part of the subject property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Development Contract, affirm and consent to the provisions thereof and agree to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the subject property owned by her trust. Dated this -day of 2014. ris Sidell, Trustee STATE OF MINNESOTA )Ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by Iris Sidell, Trustee NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 651 -452 -5000 172823 v42 17 (All of these properties are free of any encumbrances) 172823 x•42 18 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Edina Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 of (Name of Bank) b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on December 31, 2015. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one -year terms unless, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the. U.S. Mail, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 5& Street. Edina. Minnesota 55424 and Is actually received by the City Manage at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which; shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to heron. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter d Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. By: Its 172823 A2 19 TREE AND SLOPE PRESERVATION EASEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, is made 2014, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Grantee ") and Carol Sidell and Iris Sidell Trust U/A Dated August 21, 2012( "Grantors") ' A. Grantors is the.owner of certain real property located in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin; :State of Minnesota, legally: described as Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8, Block 1, Acres DuBois, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "Property"). B. On Grantee granted Grantor's application for subdivision of the Property. C. As a condition of approval of the. subdivision, Grantee required Grantor to grant a tree and slope preservation easement ( "Easement ") for the protection of specific trees and slopes over a portion of the Property, legally described as An Easement for Slope and Tree Preservation purposes over, under and across the west 20.00 feet of Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, ACRES DUBOIS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, over, under and across that part of Lot 5, said Block 1, lying northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 22.39 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof, to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 5,_ distant 21.88 feet southeasterly of the most northerly, northwest corner of Lot 6, said Block 1, said last described line to be hereinafter known as Line "A ", over, under and across that part of the West 20.00 feet of said Lot 5 lying southerly of said Line "A ", over; under and across the North 20.00 feet of said Lot 6, over, under and across. the South 20.00 feet of Lot 7, said Block 1 and over, under and across that part of Lot 8, said Block 1, lying southerly of a line drawn from the southwest corner of said Lot 8 to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 20.00 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof. (the "Easement Property") and depicted on attached Exhibit A. NOW THEREFORE, inconsideration of the City's approval and in satisfaction of the condition. imposed, Grantor hereby grants and conveys unto the Grantee a tree and slope preservation easement over, under 'and across the Property for the protection of specific trees. The terms of this Easement are as follows: 1. Except as permitted by this Agreement, no action of any kind may be undertaken to disturb the slopes within the areas identified in Exhibit A or harm the specific trees listed in Exhibit B as of this date. The following activities are prohibited within the Easement Property identified: 1728220 1. A. Cutting or removing the trees specified in Exhibit B without a special permit granted by the City of Edina. If one of the specified trees needs to be removed for some reason, new trees having a cumulative total of 15" in diameter or greater must be planted to replace it (species approved by the city). B. The deposit of waste, yard waste, or debris. C. Outside storage of any kind. D. Activity detrimental to the preservation of the slopes or specified trees. 2. Grantor hereby grants to the Grantee the affirmative right, but not the obligation to enter upon the Easement Property for the purposes of inspection and enforcement of this Tree and Slope Preservation Easement and to take whatever actions are necessary to restore the Easement Property to its agreed upon nature. Grantee may assess the reasonable costs of this restoration against the Property, and Grantor waives all rights to contest those costs. Further Grantee may enforce the terms of this Easement by any proceeding in law or in equity to restrain violation, to compel compliance, or to recover damages, including attorneys' fees and costs of the enforcement actions. Grantor is not liable for the actions of any third party, other than its employees, agents or contractors, which may violate the terms of this Easement, unless Grantor, its employees, agents or contractors had actual knowledge of the violation and failed to take reasonable action to stop the violation. 3. Failure .to enforce any provision of this Tree and Slope Preservation Easement upon a violation of it cannot be deemed a waiver of the right to do so as to that or any subsequent violation. 4. Invalidation of any of the terms of this Tree and Slope Preservation Easement will in no way affect any of the other terms, which will remain in full force and effect. 5. . This Tree and Slope Preservation Easement does not convey a right to the public to use the Easement Property nor does it convey any right of possession in the Easement Property to. the public or the Grantee. Access by the Grantee to the Easement Property is limited to access necessary for purposes of inspection and enforcement as specified in paragraph 2 above. Grantee is not entitled to share in any award or other compensation given in connection with a condemnation or negotiated acquisition of all or any part of the Easement Property by any authority having the power of eminent domain. Grantee hereby waives any right it 'may have to such an award or compensation. 6. This Tree and Slope Preservation Easement runs with the Easement Property and is binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, and inures to the benefit of the Grantee, its successors and assigns. 7. This Tree and Slope Preservation Easement may be amended or released in whole or in part by an instrument signed by the Grantee and Grantor or its respective successors and assigns in interest. 1728220 2 8. The above named Grantor, for itself, its successors and assigns does covenant with the Grantee, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee title of the above described Easement Property; that it has the sole right to grant and convey the Tree and Slope Preservation Easement to the Grantee; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Easement Property; and that it indemnifies and holds the Grantee harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. 9. Grantor retains all responsibilities and shall bear all costs and liabilities of any kind related to the ownership, operation, upkeep and maintenance of the Easement Property. Grantor shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the Grantee its officers, employees, and agents from and against all liabilities, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims, demands or judgments, including without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees arising from or in any way. connected with: (1) the result of a violation or alleged violation of any State environmental statute or regulation; (2) injury to or the death of any person, or physical damage to any property, resulting from any act, omission, condition or other matter related to or incurring on or about the premises, regardless of costs, unless due solely to the gross negligence of any of the Grantee, its officers, employees or agents; and (3) existence and administration of this Tree Preservation Easement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor(s) (has/have) executed this instrument on the date first written above. GRANTORS: Carol E. Sidell By: Its: Iris Sidell Trust U/A Dated August 21,2012 By; Its• Trustee STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged. before me this 2014, by of ( "Grantor "), on its behalf. Notary Public 1728220 3 day of the a Minnesota (SEAL) GRANTEE: CITY O)F EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was. acknowledged before me this day of 2014, by James B. Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 612 452 -5000 AMP /cjh 172822v7 4 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description of Property: lolls111111 ADDW 44O 610RM ROAD ArD 4M ON U MU M M I harry arDfy but this play survey or reW am Wed by me or under my 91 K AND ifs RMATIM EAM OM (red sup & od N I an a duly FOR FRAN(✓s�flL o Ab nun t4�rs s aus Noised tmnd Surveyor order be Im I I of a Stole of Ironer o. i NORTH o s o - - -I -J LA - — °� :1- 2114nised p. S(KffIDfA Data - soscat Rcg Na 416SS 09 10 FM a 211 uo AM 64 -err (w Ire UM uo °era s IEEEa M Ae saM UT IrES u4ts oam� �+a>IE tut W 5969 S9°°o WE F ll5m i1 !D A \ Aiii '4 i —pdry� r ,may Yml /y r�/� I —_I\ na 8 ten. r— �-I >ae I LWA 14 sbELL TRAL YI I Y t o I \� Weer KWA I t J r I III I LW ,I I— 7`� ae A,V I i ,I�;�� �C �a • ran I 921% 4Fhe4 I n� �I I I A, 14 ''� I I I I rt W I 1 et"'ar I I I I P I 14 III 1L__.rJl I .. as aun 41a AIO e e 8 $a�.AU44ae A�4 t NHN " "" AU" ° .�4BaS -SI Dew YWS4°sS An—a1B1S ------------- ,—--------------------- - - - - -� JUBR ❑Denotes Roposed gape ad Tree Reser Um Easement Is snub ke of Lot 4, Rock I, ACRES DUBW is Marti SUIRVEYPIG ossumed to hose o bearing of South 89 degrees A40Bedtefl�W = 26 minutes 34 seconds East. 169•i36921d µaa 172822v7 5 SLOPE AND TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT REPORT FOR FRANC SDELL ADDRESS; 4412 MORNNGSIDE ROAD AND 4232 OAKDALE AVENUE, ECOK MN I Denotes Proposed Slope and Tree Preservation Easement _= 44 - - - - 1 'I`hl111`N h -Ff / \1 \II I t`hf11 +11 \ /h -1 I F -Ihf I / \I 11 `I111111 \1 I.1 L1J I � I L:1 __ l• r 596.63 SOO °02'44 "E I1- 135.00 i i 50.01 , 20 20 11's .pa 2s `/q __0rmne9e 87.84 6 to ;5_ 1 a'c' $ I I 1 a SIbELL �� � TRAIL $1 -- J z I ] S. so & %I 16 �� I I NORTH m mWI ° -a-I I S'�°°�. _ _ .: v, �. Li �.: I I N n Y „j vi \ 7249, 1- 60.43 0 SCALE 40 • na vi / w` p t5 -I �zo -�I 1 ;�'• -f `N00e04'27"W — . — . — — e +` 1 % %' — — -� / J J•Jd'N 1 ( IN FEET ) 44.00 135.00 - I 67 /I -1 c NN• N00'OB'20 -w `\ 20.00, 1 I , S4a / /'� ��.:*o 2504p68 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS ^ - $0047' / 42Z5 SE Comer of Lot Q BIOCk 1, •5 T 59.59 �1 —� /g 63 5y Ad2E5 DUBOIS- _______1__ I C F I TDrainege and UlOily Eae Ile/nent =- f - 20 o •u' Most N9y., Wm¢ Of -- 8, W I Block 1, ACRES DUB05 - - __ 5 ' I 3 I I J L._._.J._ L, i •W s Y- I I I SF�.I. .•?� pNI / NO SCALE �ry 8 �� 'o�+y BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND AD,�INING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES AND BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING LOT N LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE FLAT. I hereby certify that this plan, survey or v I s �. I I report was prepared by me or under my I direct supervision and that I am a duly a, 1 c� 1 I I so 47.163 "E 1 I I Licensed Land Surveyor under the lows m >. — — — — — — — — - - -- — — — -- — -- I � L of t e State of Minnesota. 179.00 0 0 - 66.38 1 .1 22.39 N 9 10.1.97 75.00 637.96 , , „ , r_ _, _ _ S00°04'03 "E R ; u j p +. ++ ...- f p t — — — — — — — — — — — --SVG C —f Lol B. Block 1, �— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - ACRES DUBOIS , �_" ` --Sw. comer of Lot 5. Block 1, -' ���- �� , ' ' ' -21 -�4 � ACRES DUBOIS OSHUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: Reg. No. 44655 V 'f " JOB #12425FP The south line of Lot 4, Block 1, ACRES DUBOIS is JMSD 5V assumed to have o bearing of South 89 degrees 26 minutes 34 seconds E st. i� � �i� (•-• II I I n III Je.acrelandeurvey(4gma,Lcom 1" n A p o n+ na 6. n• n e n+ ne o' Im EXHIBIT "B" Drawing Number of the Protected Trees: LITTEL STREET 7 4233 MY rrtovrnn 42M 40 6 1, •' 4234 - - - - - -- 4257 I --- - - - --1 r5, .23E I sees I 1 ---- -� 4239 4299 W 4240 i 1 3 cc 4242 4273 I 4244 1 2 I I 1 1 L109 I 4291 � I 4240 I . 4"71 _ I I _ 4100 NO SOME MORRWNINGSIDE so, ROAD' 1728220 6 Exhibit C Description of Trees Tree # . Species DBH Condition Notes Lot, 25 buroak 36 fair 33 buroak 26 good 120 buroak 20 good 153 bur oak 12 fair 4 156 buroak .16 qood 167 buroak 29 excellent 170 buroak 20 good 173 American elm 26.5 excellent 5 179 black walnut 24 excellent On the Property line 5 182 buroak 29 good leaner 8 1728220 7 (These properties, are free of any encumbrances) 172s22v7 ACRE LAND SURVEYING ® 8 -ooel E768-M-6278 40 Baltimore St. NE quite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 is acrelandsurvey�gmail com 2 `ra January 21, 2014 ACRES DUBOIS (Unrecorded) PROPOSED TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: An Easement for Slope and Tree Preservation purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1, ACRES DUBOIS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 22J9 feet northerly of the southwest corner thereof, to a point on the northeasterly line of said Lot 5, distant 21.88 feet southeasterly of the most northerly, northwest corner of Lot 6, said Block 1, said last described line to be hereinafter known as Line "A ", over, under and across that part of the West 20.00 feet of said Lot 5 lying southerly of said Line "A ", over, under and across the North 20.00 feet of said Lot 6, over, under and across the South 20.00 feet of Lot 7, said Block 1 and over, under and across that part of Lot 8, said Block 1, lying southerly of a line drawn from the southwest corner of said Lot 8 to a point on the east line of said Lot 8, distant 20.00 feet northerly of the southeast corner thereof. Sheet 2 of 2 SHEETS R �I'®RT / R �COOMtMt�NDATI©N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII. E. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Action ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Southdale Medical Building, 6525 France Avenue —.Amend Conditions Of Approval To Build The Proof-of-Parking Plan, Resolution No. 2014 -21 Action Requested: Approve the revised plans. Information / Background: The City Council is asked to consider an amendment of the approved plans for the addition to the Southdale Medical Office Building. (See attached applicant project description and plan revisions.) There are two changes proposed: I. Parking Ramp. The applicant proposes to build the proof of parking plan (5th level) and not build the underground parking level. The proof -of- parking would then extend the 5th level of the ramp toward the hospital. (See attached plans.) The result would be 7 less parking spaces at build out, and the parking ramp 6 inches taller. The footprint of the ramp would remain the same; and the number of proof -of- parking stalls would still exceed city code. 2. Office Building. The 2nd -4th levels of the office building would be extended over the loading dock area, and pulled away from the existing building. (See attached plans.) The square footage of the building would remain the same. Building materials remain the same, but have been repositioned. (See attached plan comparison.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2014 -21 approving the changed plans • Applicant narrative and revised plans City of Edina - 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 'f RESOLUTION NO. 2014-21 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLAN REVISIONS FOR A SITE. PLAN WITH VARIANCES AT 6525 -45 FRANCE AVENUE TO BUILD A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION AND PARKING RAMP EXPANSION FOR THE SOUTHDALE MEDICAL OFFICE CAMPUS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Silver Oak Development on behalf of the IRET Properties, received approval (Resolution 2013- 77) to build a four story 60,000 square foot medical office expansion, and new parking ramp expansion to the existing 273,000 square foot Southdale Medical Office building located at 6525 -45 France Avenue. 1.02 The following actions were taken to allow the project: 1. Site Plan Approval. 2. Parking Ramp Setback Variances from 40 and 34.5 feet to 34.5, 28 and 20 feet for the new parking deck to match the existing parking ramp setback. 3. Parking Stall Variance from 1,715 spaces to 1,577 spaces. A proof of parking plan for an additional deck could expand parking to 1,749 spaces has been provided. The property is legally described as follows: See attached. 1.03 The applicant is now requesting the following revisions to the approved plans: Parking Ramp: The applicant proposes to build the proof of parking plan (5th level) and not build the underground parking level. The proof -of- parking would then extend the 5th level of the ramp toward the hospital. The result would be 7 less parking spaces at build out, and the parking ramp 6 inches taller. The footprint of the ramp would remain the same; and the number of proof -of- parking stalls would still exceed city code. Office Building. The 2nd -4th levels of the office building would be extended over the loading dock area, and pulled away from the existing building. The square footage of the building would remain the same. Building materials remain the same, but have been repositioned. The plans reduce the number of parking stall built from the original plan by 7. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952 - 927 -8861 a Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-21 Page Two Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings, which are consistent with the original findings for approval: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space and ramp variances. 2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain adequate. parking to support the expansion and existing uses. 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, the setbacks for the parking ramp expansion, match the existing setbacks. The parking study concludes that the proposed addition and existing uses on the site would be supported by the existing parking facilities. Traditionally, the City of Edina has not required parking stalls, when they are not needed. Additional parking could be provided by adding levels to the existing parking ramps if needed. 4. The parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approval of the revised Site Plan and Building Elevations date stamped February 5, 2014, at 6525 -45 France Avenue for Silver Oak Development on behalf of IRET Properties. Conditions required in the original approval, Resolution 2013 -77, shall still apply. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on February 18, 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2014-21 Page Two CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting_ of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2014, City Clerk COLLABORATIVE DesignGroup,inc. February 18, 2014 Cary Teague. Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Revisions to Southdale Medical Office Building, Parking Ramp and Variances Dear Cary: cc Architecture Engineering Interiors Planning Preservation Please be advised that both the parking garage and office building components of the project has been revised somewhat from what was approved by the City Council in October. The primary change to the office,building is the extension of the second, third and fourth floors over the loading dock area and a corresponding reduction in area on the north side of the building facing the existing 6545 Building. The distance between the two buildings increased from 26 feet to 50 feet. The primary change to the parking garage consists of eliminating the basement level and replacing it with a partial fifth level at the south end of the garage. Previously this fifth level was considered part of the "proof of parking" that could be added in the future if needed. Proof of parking will now be an expansion of the fifth level to the north end of the parking garage along 65th Street. The site'plan approved by the City Council on October 1, 2013 remains unchanged in regards to site access and circulation, utilities, and landscape treatment. The "foot print" and overall dimensions of the parking garage remain unchanged. The revised and updated garage plan has 1,173 parking spaces compared to 1,180 in the previous scheme. The proof of parking is 162 spaces. When the garage and proof counts are combined with the 397 spaces in the surface lots; the total would be 1,732 spaces on site; compared to 1,715 spaces.required by the zoning ordinance. G The three variances originally submitted with the Site Plan Application have been revised to reflect the ` proposed changes to the parking ramp. The inter - related variances are as follows: 1. Fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Ordinance. Q ®� 2. Reduced setbacks from the lot lines. 3. Increase in building height relative to set backline locations. ®��0 As noted in the City of Edina - Variance Application (page 2) the following four items are addresse�® Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer 100 Portland Avenue South; Suite 100 Minneapolis; Minnesota 55401 t 612.332.3654 (332.3626 www.collaborativedesigngroup.com 4 cc O The proposed variance will relieve some practical difficulties relative to set back and height of the parking ramp. The parking ramp needs to be expanded to five levels to meet the parking requirements. The existing three level ramp, structurally designed for verticaLexpansion-, is,at or over the setbacks for three levels. It would be difficult and costly to not add to the. existing structure. G Adding on to the existing ramp already too close to the property line is an extraordinary circumstance unique to this property. C The proposed variances will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance. The new four /five level ramp will generally meet height and setback requirements along 65th Street. © The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The adjacent blocks contain hospital, retail, and offices occupancies that will not be adversely affected by the granting of these variances. A revised explanation of each variance and supporting data is attached. Changes and revisions are highlighted in red. Revised images sketches showing the changes to the office building and parking garage visible from 66th Street and Drew Avenue are attached. Also included are selected floor plans. Parking ramp sheet A205 shows the new fifth level floor plan and office building sheets A201 and A202 describe the revised plans for the first floor and typical upper floors (2 to 4). Very truly yours, Collaborative Design Group, Inc. rar::;ckman Project Architect Enclosures NOS C® :o Variance No. 1: Parking Spaces Provided Revised: February 18, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance to provide fewer parking spaces than what is required by the Zoning Ordinance. Per SubSection 850.08, Subd. 1, paragraph M, parking spaces shall be provided at the rate of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space for each physician or dentist. Parking Calculations and Analysis: Existing office buildings @ 273,000 sq. ft. + new office building @ 60,000 sq. ft. _ 333,000 sq, ft. gross / 200 sq. ft. = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one time) = .1,715 cars total required on site. Analysis of existing parking lot and ramp usage in June 2013 indicates that approximately 932 spaces, or 74.3 %, of the available 1254 are being utilized at any one time. ( See Attached Exhibit B — Existing Parking Utilization) Based on existing usage of 932 plus full requirement of 300 spaces for the new 60,000 sq. ft. office building the owner would like to propose the initial I,tYo construction of 4 level ramp and half of the fifth level accommodating 1,173 spaces.. The parking ramp plus the other 397 spaces on site would provide a total of 1,570 parking spaces on the campus. 1,570 is 91.5% of the required 1,715 parking stalls. See attached Survey and parking ramp plans C' s) See The north half of the fifth level of the parking ramp, accommodating 162, is proposed as "proof of parking," bringing the potential total to 1,732 spaces. attached Exhibit C — Parking Summary and parking ramp plans. & 0 rjok ,nl � Exhibit B - Parking Utilization Analysis Southdale Medical Campus Between June 11 and 17, 2013 a parking utilization analysis was conducted on the existing parking facilities (surface lots and parking ramp) Numbers below indicate the parking spaces recorded as open at the times indicated. Tues 6/11 — Surface lots — 33 open, Ramp 249 open — 10 AM 75 open, 263 open — 3 PM Wed 6/12 — Surface lots — 70 open, Ramp 243 open - 10 AM 49 open, Ramp 269 open — 3 PM Thurs 6/13 Surface lots — 31 open, Ramp 250 open — 10 AM 97 open, Ramp 271 open — 3 PM Fri 6/14 Surface lots — 105 open, Ramp 279 open — 10 AM 132 open, Ramp 307 open — 3 PM %$% 01 Mon 6/17 Surface lots — 19 open, Ramp 224 open — 10 AM 1 V10 55 open, Ramp 275 open — 3 PM After deleting the smallest and largest numbers, the average number of open spaces on site at any given time is 322. 1254 spaces on site minus 322 = 932 occupied spaces. Exhibit C - Project Parking Count Summary Southdale Medical Campus July 26, 2013 Revised: February 18, 2014 Zoning Requirements: 1 car per 200 sq. ft. gross floor area, plus 1 car per doctor 333,000 sq. ft. gross / 200 sq. ft. = 1,665 cars + 50 physicians (estimated number on site at one time) = 1,715 cars total Proposed Project Parking: Existing Parking to Remain: Surface Parking (west and north lots): 310 Lower Level Parking (6525 Building): 75 "Courtyard" Parking: 6 Total Existing Parking: 391 New /Remodeled Parking Ramp: First Level (Grade): 178 Second. Level: 285 Third Level: 292 Fourth Level: 288 Fifth Level (south end): 130 Total Parking in Ramp: 1,173 South, Surface Lot (new) 6 Total Parking Proposed: 1,570 Proof of Parking: (future, if needed ) 018 1 Ramp Fifth Level (north end): 162 'Ago I TO Total Parking 1,732 ao 1mss Variance No. 2: Parking Ramp Setbacks Revised February 18, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance for front and side yard setbacks exceeding those allowed by the. zoning ordinance. Per paragraph G of Subd 5.of SubSection 850.08 the required front and side yard setback is 20 feet plus 1 foot for each foot of height exceeding 20 feet. It is proposed that the existing parking ramp, three levels at the north end and two levels at the south end, be expanded vertically to a height of four levels at the north end and five levels at the south end (possible five levels at north end with "proof of parking "). The existing parking ramp width and structural column grid will be maintained. The existing three level ramp is already over the set back lines along 65th Street and Drew Avenue. Setback Summary Data: Building height equals the required setback. Proposed height: Four level ramp at top of parapet (north end): 34' -8" Five level ramp at top of parapet (south end): 45' -0" Proposed height: Top of "glass box" at southeast corner: 46' -6" Proposed Setbacks from property lines: Drew Avenue at 65th Street (north end of site): 20.06 ft. Drew. Avenue at 66th Street (south end of site): 28.54 ft. 66th Street, (south end): 34.5 ft. 65th Street (north end): 36.5 ft. (C- 1 4A.0 f 0V5 Q �` 1 X110 4 Variance No. 3: Parking Ramp Height Revised: February 8, 2014 Explanation of Request: Applicant is seeking a variance for building a parking ramp.exceeding the heights allowed by setback criteria described the Zoning Ordinance. Per paragraph G of Subd 5 of SubSection 850.08 the required front and side yard setback is 20 feet plus 1 foot for each foot of height exceeding 20 feet. It is proposed that the existing parking ramp, three levels at the north end and two levels at the south end, be expanded vertically to a height of four levels at the north end and five levels at the south end (five levels at north end with "proof of parking "). The existing parking ramp width and structural column grid alignments will -be maintained and extended to the south. The existing three level ramp is already over the set back lines along 65th Street and Drew Avenue. Setback and Height Data Summary: Setback from lot line equals the maximum building height Setbacks from lot lines: Proposed Height Drew Avenue at 65th Street (north end of site): 20.06 ft. 34' -8" @ parapet Drew Avenue at 66th Street (south end of site): 28.54 ft. 45' -0" @ parapet 46-6" @ "glass box" 66th Street: 34.5 ft. 46' -8" @ "glass box" 45' -0" @ parapet 65th Street: 36.5 ft. 34' -8" @ parapet See attached Survey (Exhibit A) and Parking Ramp Plans and Images Sketches Fie � ® ®�� LEGEND PUBLIC ART BICYCLE PARKING BUS STOP PERVIOUS PAVERS COLORED CONCRETE BRICK PAVERS BITUMINOUS CONCRETE TURF DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE PERENNIAL BED w p� 0 NORTH 0 30 60 IR T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST W` f -- (� �_ _ r INA r� ._..fir -q : - - rob- -'s - a� _ McAlwal" man Maw MAN- Ilk ,yam � • •r•�: `ap, • 1. �J ttl�i D _ `� b P � (Dr(ta � jliJ�Y111r I�L� snowI map Southdale Medical Office Building and Parking Ramp City of Edina Council Presentation Di :February 18, 2014 Revised Submittal x j S Southdale Medical Office Building and Parking Ramp City of Edina Council Presentation Di :February 18, 2014 Revised Submittal Previous Submittal October 1, 2013 Revised Office Building February 18, 2014 � P;' M i r �,,¢ x� -' -�+._ !: �" .y 5;'. � � ,� �S "'+f✓ -T�y F'I -`FwJ "�...c%; a. z.'fi. si e'� � s'-c � y -.. 4 ?`•x' yiiaw 'Q+�' 5T"d ,• .i �c�zv " )fax �'"}y i LF �' vc 'Y� -; e� rJ.RC''�' ,� v t;.7i .4�� 3 'i��� ear ''� 5- X1.3 'z�a� 1 � � .iii X� �w� '•`' a S � sF -'a�_ f,°ii '-� $i � �.. ��iS�F." � c' "4�`"' {��<riai `F's",+"n�s ?� f'�)u �� - ��'? y.<`c• Y" �,�� yan'f' t � ,r r'� ~3 F � ay � E_"kh�.,?°'4• �ry 3, i� � c � i �t� v~S'a�+- ,d.' '`' < �;�` �� � ";i4 +!- � � ? r'<,� ,•, �` , �,. 5 -.� .. G _ `wpb u Yt��,,,b� ! t: S.•J3 �i � °. .� +f.L',.r` fair ��� � R fir.• y� 1.rl`� xtt Hr z '�-• Y ` "' �".,�, �:._ r.. .y 2 • � Z� Y � � � "b` , +� w °'- � fl; „ � .x � �' t 13.'b,' +�'�,, b'.,r���c�"re�"`�' 4'` �i���� E+� { � 3 � 0 �y ��wj et•,� � r+t.'. �° aia.. �%^E �„ .ij"t,�,1 r (`.: ,�"3f y� �r �..e ff .�'�r'' }y..p y� .r�y�' „y � y�S'£ i ,� �,Y "its' 1'� k, # �* ®. +�. -Y� vi.f � yS�.. F+r�'" af}. �,� ?� ^ q -. 'e.�'� Sx �'i ?4ir�,��P F���i �;�' B,�y���"�,y�i�P � �i'"�'#� 4� � Y.e.. �,�Y"�.,� �e s - ,z 1�,'v �,.._. y � r•4 :• � �� I RET c: INVESTORS REAL'ESTATE TRUST j s vp a Previous Submittal October 1 2013 Revised Office Building February 18, 2014 4 r �INRET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST 0 I�Ifl�m11 <?i'I�'�l -71 jl 1 r �I t 1 3 1 1 , Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation t 03 a c r�� w `�I•,�� �q i��� ��r qa` \'iil!Its - 111 M1�. jjjj�[�[ Ia �- �i ' Y7 �.. .Gi. / ;;.�t� LIMA? _ s- ..yl, •V� _Ssrs ` / .- I lY/ - --'- 1, � �� a i• Psi I-� t � �1 t� ; �;r ( � °L. r`.i�; "j��fl� j� . +�- �`L`:\ I _� � t'� lio ',.a,`•. Aim'tlw, tpalP.,�Ed_ MAN ,I�� or.�� � :e,�j��e?9,C��ir,,� •, � `�j' � �.�i�'�• _ - II; �r g� ���� '� _ _ _ � %�_.� ��s7 A, >�s�"c,, p.r<� r`A�,�;�•, alb _ _ a 1111111 s: tW�>� 1 it,- V N. - ' ". n— � "�," r �L;• 1��. ", _ - - - - i�. �=. - � A t. F,,+ +r, iv :-inn ��(i.r?�� �' }' I. -..- — Ehllj�• �(�€���.�`f(� f 1 f � LS,��i ��.����� err, � , � : � -� � � �� T' s`9.,�"'.fPiP �%' `�' �s s l� -•-��' V - -- - -- IRMA 7 ". r 71�•`P� "fa , =.. %�`' sQlya. 5 1rr - aFD 9 JJ ,�,• t 1, .I, J r— � 1�-�. �� f� t �, i. . I.� Es Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation } w �` 3_7 1 _w- V; 11 7 . . . . . . . . . . it Y'. 77- Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation .0�5 1254. 1570 715 1732 . Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 211 3� 1 1 ..i1,i.' A. •\ Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 0 NOR'iH 0 30 60 INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST LEGEND PUBLIC ART tQ� BICYCLE PARKING` BUS STOP��� �Q+�� r �4 PERVIOUS PAV %% ® COLORED CONCRETE�� ,syn3 BRICK PAVERS BITUMINOUS CONCRETE °. TURF DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE PERENNIAL BED 0 NOR'iH 0 30 60 INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST R ET INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST jam k I'M 1'v 1�%. r *T. WING, Boa , An -mi NMI Hirm ir "A31 IS% Vic. 3 IL-9f, t S" L VMS lmm,mp:.. 7 TE j"k N—V "-bfft 'tmv ME MI ZVI — , 4A Im � Nik R�m rj 114, Awl kA iT. 0 Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 77- "3i ow �JMPTR F. OEM a: SEEM r4i k 13"1 SM i RU5"WA l EZ '?I i M "! 0 a al Imm; W*vb MAY 7" # m-m -am- I Rum MINA III 1►. rw F, rzf�: - I, Z—!-;277-P 1 - e W_ffftfi FIV-1 91 fV! ly, ................. 77 77==177�7 I Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation Rim is p-77-En Jill Bill wr r 0 ILI. lug biL KENN EFm WV ri LN •14 A1V `� min tim P, fi�e Nn VM* rf� _y !?Y•.�z '£,.aL,Jc it'..�: ti':f':7,.v-s4y . ywitl low -W 3w Mal 77 Naw mail iT eggnog" I pilm ask" AM SIMI •7 mum I 11 ti j I Southdale Medical Office Building City Council Presentation 1 � - , r�kbe Var R d ng, I R, E.T INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST .... um MAL 2DU LAN D5 re ILLABORATNE sigaGrx)uP•i.- imW ven Aue Swfi, Su6e 7 W 6aPd'y MlMemm 55601 12=.96N 1611]31]616 mA6porm.�TU9.mo V R� Y 3 u u V 3 J a 1i -N Z a 11 c Ym Q a c a 6�0 W ION TO SITE APPROVAL IARY 18,20U I LEVEL ONG PLAN k205 '.� ��'�gti � -q �''. t �� ��VaF`f °',� w }���r[ '�?1 c °se's r "°t`.'� #i�'� �• +� 53,1 ,^�;iri _?,ylih r� ��'� 4tija}�z Y? .ns^� ��'F`s,.�S� Ga �z�'r� � i�� �� r.,, 1 :fi.,2 - ae;, .._•.7a _ ,xm.� �. ne. i .. .- -4_, .: �"�� !K.�7�.ets: t. ,_,..ru t-t.J f„ e- ?�f_� �Ph _f� r Illllllllllllllla 8 a i N 8 Southdale Medical Campus . o Z E Qgyl ��$ OFFICE BUILDING N N Illllllllllllllla 8 a i a 8 Southdale Medical Campus . o Z E Qgyl ��$ OFFICE BUILDING N N fall. 3800 West 66th Street a Edina, MInnesote 55435 :... __ _ I 2ND LEVEL PARKING RAMP . •17.4 19.6 i .. .. 1.. .. T.,., f I MV. Td W., -, I 9 r + s? z Faa — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — -- -- --- - - - - -- F r f N ao � � d � : .- . - � • tug "w+rtoa -. I, I r 1 �Wi I I it � �. a: ; t 1 ... a1•d . i - taE.atnaax m 'I I ..�'''�'' � y I i � w x e as I I - - -- — — — — M ti qV y' Tar i j a` i Y f �i: -: -tr - -- -- - - -- - --- ---- -- -- -- - - - - - -- -� H 1 -�, ed Sd �_— _— _— _— _— _- 1___— _ —_ —_ �_— _— _— _ —_ —_�_ �J -1 _- -_ -_ -_ a -tm -.ate,• a -tOP ad aed ad ,. J -.�?• `�m4i t �` � :k � r 5 F 15.1 18.1 17A 18.8 19.7 20.9 22.1 - :. 1 >:. TYPICAL' SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN, COLLABORATIVE DevgnGmUp,f.. ,00 5 ,,00 p9123323154 Imam= VI /E' \V V V. Z w Lo m � W co �+ w V� o ,7 W avow• flat. REVISION TO SrrE PLAN APPROVAL FEBRUARY_18,2O14 pavtsoa- faooaao tmmraamt alto m wuw/n ammo rwx roa SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A202 r To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -19 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. NA, o e '_r w m N;rA o v ,8y • ',�n)11'llli P��� • IHNE1 Agenda Item #: VIII. F. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -19 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-19 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following.listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Nancy Ward Patricia Haynes Sally Schultz Linda Cherne Edina Fire Department: N.C. Little Memorial Hospice, Inc. Edina Park Department: New Horizen Academy Dated: February 18, 2014 Slab roller (Bailey Brand) w /built -in table, Raku miscellaneous equipment & glazes and studio equipment Pottery glazes, work boards and pottery tools Three large boards, 22 little boards, one frame and box of charcoal, three illustration boards, postcard stand five chip clips, one color wheel, one wooden palette, one plastic pallet with paper, eight archive plastic sheets, two packs of plastic print holders, 11 canvas of various sizes, miscellaneous painting supplies, canvas brushes One large wooden easel $1,000.00 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK $250.00 Special Event Entertainment Edinborough Park James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting,City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk ` 4 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager w9���r� o e f,71 •',�')Rl'C7IIN • 1880 Agenda Item #: VIII. G. Action Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Parking Permit Policy and Fees in 50th and France Commercial District; Ordinance 2014 -2 Action Requested: Approve Ordinance 2014 -2, waiving of the Second Reading is requested. Information / Background: The 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study recommends that the permit parking fees be increased to better reflect the cost of providing public parking facilities. Currently, employees of Edina businesses located at 50th and France have the opportunity to park in excess of the posted limits if they purchase a parking permit for $5.00 per month. In 2013, approximately 620 parking permits were issued. Approximately 430 stalls are currently designated for 5 -hour or employee parking. The current fee is significantly below the monthly cost to operate & maintain the public parking facilities. In 2013, for example, $250,000 was spent on minimal maintenance and year -round operations for 1,022 public parking stalls. This comes to $21 per stall per month simply for basic operating costs, not to mention the $5.7 million in needed repairs and improvements. With the owners and operators asking to improve overall conditions in the ramps, the need to increase the fee becomes apparent. During the several months of data gathering leading up to the Feasibility Study, several concerns were identified which influence the proposed change in the fee structure and employee parking policy: • There are more employees in the maximum shift (approximately 750) than employee- designated parking stalls (430) • Some employees park on the lower levels in areas designated for customers • Difficulty in knowing if there are available stalls in lower level of South Ramp • Preference by both employees and customers to park in the most convenient stalls (South and Middle Ramps) • Need for enforcement in a manner that does not deter customers • Both property owners and business operators oppose charging customers a fee to park. • Desire to have reserve funds available to proactively maintain ramps in state of good condition Staff has met with several business operators and representatives from the 50th and France Business Association to identify new rates that do not place too great a burden on employees. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 As a result, the monthly parking fees are proposed to be raised to generate additional revenue to maintain the public ramps. A multi- tiered structure is proposed to provide low -cost parking for part -time employees and to accommodate, other employees that prefer a dedicated stall or a covered stall. The new fee structure. is anticipated to be effective when the current permits expire on March 30, 2014. Based on the new fees, approximately $125,000' is estimated to be generated annually. These funds will be available for public improvements in the 50th and France Commercial Area and will reduce the annual operating and maintenance costs that are accessed to each property. An Ordinance is required to modify the fee schedule in Section 2 -274. The proposed fees are attached. Time is of the essence so that new permit materials can be prepared in advance of the expiration date. The second reading is requested to be waived so that implementation of the new policy can occur with minimal disruption. The City Manager is authorized by Section 24 -397 to designate locations where vehicles with valid permits may be parked. The proposed policy is also attached. Attachments: Ordinance No. 2014 -2, Amending Code Section 2 -274 Parking Permit Policy 4 ORDINANCE NO. 2014-2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A (fees and charges) to Code Section 2 -274 are amended to read as follows: Article and Division Chapter and Section Purpose of fee or charges Amount Terms Article VIII, division 5 24 -397 (b) Parking -peF $5--00 PeF FR9RO preOated Refund ...:.l(iRg must he r PeF Fns pr-eFa�ed peffnk, sticker- ed Parking permit, Zone A $10.00 Per month prorated Parking permit, Zone B $20.00 Per month prorated Parking permit, Zone C $40.00 Per month prorated Parking permit, Zone D $50.00 Per month prorated Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be April I, 2014. First Reading. February 18, 2014 Second Reading Published: Attest: Debra Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor l L :J w CITY OF EDINA 50" and France Commercial Area Employee Permit Parking Policy Background The Edina City Code (Section 24 -397) allows the City to issue parking permits to employees at 501h and France. The City Manager is authorized to designate specific locations of the employee parking. The employee parking locations "shall be those that are least convenient for patrons of the businesses located in the 50th and France Commercial Area." The January 21, 2014 Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study_ identifies several concerns with current employee parking practices and includes several recommendations to better manage.parking in the public facilities. Employee Permit Parking Zones The existing parking ramps will be identified with four zones where employees with valid permits will be allowed to park in excess of the posted 5 -hour limits. Overnight parking is not.allowed unless the vehicle displays the proper permit and is located in designated stalls. Issuance of a Zone A, B, or D permit is no guarantee that a parking stall will be available to the permit holder at any specific time or in any specific ramp. Zones A and B will also be available for 5 -hour customer parking. Issuance of a Zone C permit is valid only during the posted hours. During off -peak hours, the South Ramp lower level will be available for public parking. Zone Anticipated Fee Location No. of Stalls Maximum available to No. Permit Holders Permits ** South Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop 114 Middle Ramp, 3` level, rooftop 94 A $10 per month 550 North Ramp;3 rd level, rooftop 72 North Ramp, lower, 1St and 2 "d levels, covered 190 Zone A location, and -- g $20 per month South Ramp, 2 "d level, covered 20 115 Middle Ramp, 2nd level, covered . 90 C . $40 per month Zone A or B locations, and 80 South Ramp, lower level, covered 80 Overnight parking for business vehicle only: D $50 per month North Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop and North -- 10 Ramp, 2 "d level, covered Total= 660 745* * excludes overnight permits ** The maximum number of permits issued may be adjusted based on actual usage. DRAFT Adopted by eilLy cil (February 18, 2014) Page I 1 .Ito Edina Art Center Board Meeting Meeting Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Edina City Hall Community Room December 19, 2013 4:30 P.M. I. Call to Order Mr. Bouassida called the meeting to order at 4:37 p.m. II. Roll Call Commissioners Present: Hafed Bouassida, Kandace Ellis, Dana Lappin, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert, Colin Nelson, Paul Peterson, and Thomas Raeuchle. Commissioners Absent: Kitty O'Dea, and John Swon. Student Commissioners Present: Sophia Munic and Jack Ready. Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center. Community Members Present: None. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Chair Bouassida noted the meeting agenda had been circulated and asked if there were requests for additions or changes. It was noted that under approval of minutes, the minutes should be labeled as October 24, 2013 rather than September 26, 2014. It was suggested that Items B (Art Center Working Group Report) and C (Art Center General Manager Monthly Report) be pulled from the consent agenda for further discussion. The agenda as amended is approved and will be followed. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda A. Approval of Minutes, Regular Meeting of October 24, 2013 B. AFtC-P-ntar.IAIarkangGFOUPReper-t-OGteba-r-&-h-l-ai-;P--m--bar.201;1 I Q Art Center. 'General MaRagSF Monthly Repe- A - Oete- -bar. a Navambar. 2012 Chair Bouassida asked if there were changes or corrections to the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 24, 2013. No changes voiced. The minutes were approved as circulated. V. Community Comment No comments made. VI. Reports /Recommendations A. Edina Film Festival 2013 Report Commissioner Meifert commented that the attendance for the festival had doubled this year with the Big Lebowski and the Fabulous Ice Age having the highest attendance numbers. He noted that positive feedback had been received from the attendees and believed the event was picking up momentum as it moves forward. He believed that the planning would begin again in January for the next festival. Chair Bouassida stated that he would like to see a final report for the festival. Mr. Frey noted that the final report was included in the November meeting packet. Commissioner Peterson commended those that organized worked on the event. -hair Bouassida questioned how things will move forward with the theater. Commissioner Meifert suggested that perhaps Edina City staff come along to the meeting with the folks at the Landmark in order to better link the City to the event. The report was accepted as presented. i B. Music in Edina Report Commissioner Peterson stated that the Music in Edina working group had a good turnout with 13 in attendance at their last meeting and believed that they have gained some very interested members. He noted that following his Report he had a discussion with a Councilmember at which time a request for funding for Music in Edina had been brought forward. He noted that the Council member is supportive of funding in the amount of $10,000 for music in the parks, which will appear.,on an upcoming January Council meeting. He noted that there may also be an opportunity for the permit fees to be waived as well. He advised that Mr. Frey was also able to secure the "showmobile" once a week at no fee thanks to the Director of Parks & Recreation Ann Kattreh. No charge compared to the regular $1,000 per week fee. Commissioner Ellis reported that she recently met with Dick Crocket to explore the Edina Community Foundation and believed that would be a great place to start for charitable donations. She advised that the Foundation would take over the logistics as well as other details associated with charitable gifts to organizations. She believed that it would be beneficial to begin with the Foundation but questioned if the account should be linked specifically to the music in the parks program or the Commission in general. Chair Bouassida asked that the discussion be delayed until later in the meeting. Commissioner Ellis confirmed that the Foundation handles administrative services and does not do actual fundraising Commissioner Peterson stated that perhaps the music in the parks could be linked to the Foundation before the year end and a mailing could occur before the end of the year to incentivize giving before the year end for tax purposes. He advised that the working group is hoping to hold eight sessions for the music in the park summer series, noting that details will be worked out. Chair Bouassida asked that the group be prepared to present more details of the plan at the January meeting. The report was accepted as presented. C. Public Art Committee Report Commissioner La Valleur noted that the rash of vandalism could, in the long run, could improve the ability to receive lighting and possibly security cameras. She believed that the Crime Prevention Fund could possibly provide assistance with the matter. Commissioner Ellis confirmed that the Edina Public Art Committee is listed under the Foundation in a similar manner to which the music in the parks would like to work with the Foundation. Commissioner Raeuchle noted that he had previously sent some information regarding public art to Mr. Frey and asked that Mr. Frey distribute the information to the Commission members. Chair Bouassida questioned the recommendation of the Committee regarding the naming. Commissioner La Valleur noted that it was the recommendation of the Committee to leave the name as the public art Committee rather than using the abbreviation (EPAC) as that is when the confusion comes into play. She noted that the group is titled as the public art Committee in ordinance. Chair Bouassida stated that the fact that the name is used in ordinance would not make it impossible to change the name. Commissioner La Valleur noted that it is the recommendation of the Committee that the name remain the same. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that his problem with the name is the public art portion as the Commission focuses on art for the public as well. Commissioner Ellis believed that the name is causing confusion, as the Art Center Board has now become a formal Commission. Mr. Frey stated that part of this discussion ties into the strategic planning. He noted that if there is confusion among th Commission, there is probably more confusion in the general public. The report was accepted as presented. It D. Strategic Planning Committee Commissioner Meifert reported that at the October meeting it had been decided that a Strategic Plan would be necessary. He advised of the Commissioners involved in the Committee and noted that at the first meeting it was iecided that the document would be titled as a Work Plan rather than Strategic Plan. He advised that the Work Plan will consist of a statement of direction, a situational analysis and areas of focus, and list of key issues to be addressed. He noted that it will most likely focus on four or five items for the short-term basis and noted that review of the document would occur on a rotating basis in order to fully focus on the issues at hand. Commissioner Raeuchle advised that the draft list of issues now includes to act as a conduit to the cultural development of the City, to develop means to provide communication about arts and cultural activities that promote participation of residents, to identify existing and new venues that benefit the community artistically and culturally, and to develop the financial means to develop and promote art within Edina. Commissioner Meifert noted that each of those issues would have a strategy that includes tactics for implementation. Commissioner Lappin confirmed that the goal is to present the strategic or work plan to the Commission at the February meeting, with possible review of a draft version in January. Chair Bouassida was pleased to see this process beginning and that concrete steps would be identified to guide the Commission. He also asked for additional information in regard to open meeting laws. Mr. Frey confirmed that he could distribute the draft version of the Work Plan to the Commission and any questions through email should be sent directly to him to avoid open meeting law violations. Chair Bouassida confirmed that Commissioners could call one another with direct questions. Commissioner Peterson confirmed that he could continue with the music in the parks fundraising as discussed. The report was accepted as presented. E. Art Center Working Group Report — October & November 2013 Ar. Frey advised of an upcoming event — the Faculty & Student Show at the Art Center that will open on January 9, 2014. He reported that Margery Wells, a member of the arts and culture working group, has organized a painting working group. The first meeting was well attended, yet the second meeting was not. He asked if an .interested Commissioner could assist on that working group. Student Member Ready stated that he personally attended the first meeting of the painting working group and provided his input on why he and others did not attend the second meeting. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that perhaps that input could be provided back to Margery in order to assist her in better organizing the group. Chair Bouassida stated that perhaps a three minute presentation could be made at the next Commission meeting outlining the goals and expectations of the working group. He noted that after that time the decision could be made as to whether to approve the working group and assigning a Commissioner to the group. Mr. Frey stated that he is pursuing an idea that Commissioner Meifert proposed to partner with a local church, Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church. He advised that the idea to have Edina Art Center art work displayed in the church was presented to the church board. He advised that the idea was approved by the church board and beginning in January and shows will run for two months at a time. He confirmed that he would be open to repeating the idea in other spaces, should those spaces come to the Art Center with interest. He also discussed the possibility of creating a mural on wall space at the aquatic center. He reported that he was invited to the Grandview Community Advisory Team meeting in December at which he presented historical information regarding the Art Center and additional information regarding the need for performance space in the city. He advised that the presentation was well received and a lot of buzz has been created. He encouraged Commissioners to attend Grandview CAT meetings as they are public meetings. Commissioner Lappin stated that if she is available she could attend the Grandview meetings. 'Ir. Frey mentioned attendance for the meetings, noting that each Commissioner must have 75 percent attendance, and .)t miss three meetings in a row. Commissioner Raeuchle stated that it was his interpretation that the bylaws state that Commissioners can miss up to three meetings per year. Mr. Frey read an excerpt from the bylaws and City Code regarding attendance. He also provided a brief summary of financial and attendance information for the Art Center. He noted that his Work Plan for the next year will most likely ;. include closing the media studio. He advised that he could send out additional information to the Commission, noting that attendance has increased from the previous year. The report was accepted as presented. Mr. Frey noted that Student Member Munic is soliciting donations for Images, which is the Edina High School student art magazine. Student Member Munic provided additional information regarding Images, noting that the end goal for fundraising is $5,000. She believed that perhaps the magazine could be placed for sale at the Art Center. Commissioner Raeuchle believed that it would be a good idea to place the magazine for sale at the Art Center, along with other local businesses. F. Art Center General Manager Monthly Report — October & November 2013 No additional comments made The reports were accepted as presented. VII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Bouassida asked if there was any correspondence or petitions. None voiced. VIII. Chair and Board Member Comments Chair Bouassida stated that he would recommend that a new working group be formed to address funding in general for the Commission. Commissioner Ellis believed that idea would fit well within the'Strategic Planning Committee to start with. IX. Staff Comments No additional comments made. X. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by the Chair at 6:07 p.m. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL January 14, 2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Segreto, Deeds, Steel, Cella, Jacobson, Gieseke, Jones. Student Members present: Good, Johnson. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Segreto, Deeds, Steel, Cella, Jacobson, Gieseke, Jones. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Cella made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes— Regular Park Board Meeting of November 12, 2013 Ayes: Members Segreto, Deeds, Steel, Cella, Jacobson, Gieseke, Jones. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. Veteran's Memorial Update Ms. Kattreh introduced Kristin Aarsvold, Recreation Supervisor, and Richard Olson, Chair of the Veteran's Memorial Committee. Ms. Aarsvold provided an overview of the history of the Veteran's Memorial Committee and noted that a contract has recently been signed with Elliot Design Build, an Edina firm who will also be providing some in -kind services in support of the memorial. Work has begun, and the goal is to have the opening ceremony in November 2014. In response to a question by Member Deeds, Ms. Aarsvold explained the budget remains at $400,000. Mr. Olson explained further details about the budget, indicating the significant in -kind contributions which will significantly help that budget. Members Cella and Gieseke asked whether any money was paid to another artist. Ms. Aarsvold indicated $3,800 was paid to an artist in New York for a maquette. It was agreed to part ways with the artist and move on. She indicated there has been a learning curve in this process. It was 1 challenging to find the right people to delegate tasks to, but now that they are in place, there is much more energy in the committee. Ms. Aarsvold explained the goal is to have all of the donations and funds in place by May 1, at which point they will be presented to the City Council for approval. That would allow for ground breaking shortly thereafter. Member Jones asked about the sculpture itself. Ms. Aarsvold indicated the sculpture Will be in line with the design concept already approved by the Park Board. She invited anyone to attend the meeting on Friday morning where more details will be given. Ms. Jones stated she is a little uncomfortable approving this, not knowing what the actual sculpture will look like. Ms. Aarsvold indicated the committee members have worked extremely hard on the design over the past four years; she believes they want to stay with the eagle and the wreath and are committed to a very beautiful sculpture. Chair Steel indicated a good way for Park Board members to weigh in in the meantime will be to attend the Veteran's Memorial Committee Friday morning. Member Segreto noted the City Council will look at the final design, and so she is comfortable with their final approval. Ms. Kattreh indicated once the artist is selected, and the design is ready, the design of the eagle will be a'focal point for the fundraising campaign. So the eagle will be a very public part of this process. Ms. Kattreh recalled the artist design contest, where a New York artist won the contest. Subsequently the committee looked at reducing costs, the first of which was to find a local artist who can best match the design that was approved. VI.B. 2014 Work Plan Ms. Kattreh asked for feedback from the Park Board on the priorities of the Work Plan. She noted work has begun on the strategic plan, but more work is needed early on in the year. Member Jacobson asked to join the subcommittee. Ms. Kattreh noted she would like staff to complete an inventory of the park system as well as an RFP for a potential consultant. The strategic plan is important, though it will be challenging with the heavy construction load in 2014. Member Deeds suggested selecting some peer and aspirational cities both locally and nationally to help set guidelines and -planning. Ms. Kattreh concurred. Ms. Kattreh provided an update on the Arneson Acres Master Plan, noting staff is working with the Edina Garden Council, and plans are underway to hire a consultant for this plan. Ms. Kattreh explained the donors are interested in moving things along sooner rather than later. Member Deeds asked whether it makes more sense to place a moratorium on any changes to Arneson Acres, while the overall strategic plan is developed. 2 ,f Ms. Kattreh noted part of the Garden Council's concern is ensuring that the original vision of the donors is preserved, that it be a botanical garden. Member Segreto asked whether planning efforts can be put into Arneson Acres so their interests are not overtaken by the interests of golf and athletic fields. Member Cella agreed with Member Deeds that moving forward with an overall master park plan for Edina rather than carving out little pieces of the plan first. Member Segreto agreed about the process, while noting an overall plan does not lend itself to diversity in the parks. It was agreed the gifting documents for Arneson Acres need to be reviewed before proceeding. Ms. Kattreh reviewed cost recovery goals for enterprise facilities. She noted staff is wrapping up 2013 budgets -right now. She would like to review this item during the summer of 2014 to provide staff adequate time to work on business plans for the next year. Chair Steel indicated that those serving on the strategic planning subcommittee should serve in this area too. Members Deeds, Steel, Segreto, and Jones asked to be included in this group. Ms. Kattreh, brought up the next item of replacing playground equipment at Wooddale Park. She noted it is not a high priority for Park Board involvement, but she and Ms. Faus will continue communicating with the resident who was interested in fundraising. Ms. Kattreh briefly mentioned athletic field at Pamela Park, where work is already underway. There will be a working group for the shelter building at Pamela. The artificial field may be ready to play on in September. Ms. Kattreh asked about the Park Board's priority for Green Initiatives. Chair Steel indicated all extra resources should be dumped into master planning right now. The board decided to reach out to the Energy and Environment Commission to find out more about their current initiatives, as well as to approach the strategic planning table through the lens of Green Initiatives. Member Gieseke asked how boards typically exchange information. Ms. Kattreh responded there is a "typical" way of exchanging information; it could happen through conversations between staff or members, a joint meeting, or a report at the meeting. Member Deeds commented a lot of these secondary issues will tie into the strategic planning process, as there will be a lot of data - gathering on the front end. Member Deeds asked about the School Board's relationship with the Parks Department and the City. Member Cella stated it is something the School Board is very interested in partnerships, though there are several other ongoing studies at the School District. - Ms. Kattreh noted staff meets regularly with the School District, and they know the city is interested in more partnerships. VI.C. 2014 Park Board Meeting Calendar Ms. Kattreh noted that in 2014 a few Park Board meetings have been moved to Monday, so she wanted to point those out for advance planning for the members. Vll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. Vlll. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Chair Steel thanked Joseph Hulbert and Dan Peterson for their service on the Park Board. Ms. Kattreh also expressed appreciation for their service during the last six years. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh made the following comments: February 18 has been designated as the joint Park Board work session with the City Council. The plan is for Ms. Kattreh to make a presentation to the City Council at 5 p.m. regarding naming and donations. The work session will begin at 6 p.m. This past weekend was the Winter Ice Festival as well as the Quinn's Cup, both of which were successful. Staff continues to work on the Sports Dome, and designs are underway for Pamela Park. A significant study is underway at Braemar Golf, and a public meeting will be held January 30 to discuss the future of Fred Richards Golf Course. Golf revenues were about $460,000 off for 2013. The sign -up process is underway for the Community Garden. X. ADJOURNMENT Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to adjourn the meeting at 8:24 p.m. Ayes: Members Segreto, Deeds, Steel, Cella, Jacobson, Gieseke, Jones. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m. 4 1 h MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina City Hall — Community Room Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER 7:15 P.M. 11. ROLL CALL Answering roll call was Chair Moore and Members Mellom, Weber, Sussman, and Birdman. Absent were members Christiaansen, O'Brien, McDermott, Brandt, and Johnson. Staff present was Senior Planner, Joyce Repya. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Member Mellom moved to approve the meeting agenda. Member Birdman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.. IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES December 9, 2013 Member Birdman moved to approve the minutes from the December 9, 2013 meeting. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None VI. REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. Edina Heritage Landmark Determination of Eligibility (DOE) - Policy Statement Planner Repya reminded the board that at their November meeting Consultant Vogel presented a written policy statement reflecting the current HPB position toward properties determined eligible for landmark designation. At that time, there was quite a bit of conversation relative to the policy statement's format. Member O'Brien offered to research theformat of other. HPB policies and suggest possible changes. Although Member O'Brien was not in attendance, he did submit a revised policy statement for the board review. When Mr. O'Brien sent the revisions, he explained that the major modification to Mr. Vogel's proposal includes the creation of a heading and a new paragraph #I, which together highlight the HPB policy on issuance of a DOE. The policy would be #12. Determination of Eligibility as Significant Heritage Preservation Resources, and follows the same format as the previous eleven HPB policies found in the Heritage Preservation section of the Comprehensive Plan. ' I Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes January 14, 2014 Member Sussman commented that he thought the proposed changes to the DOE policy provided for consistency with the other policies that guide the HPB. He added that the policy clarifies responsibilities the city has embraced toward properties determined eligible for landmark designation; adding that it is good the policy will be in writing rather than simply understood. Board members agreed with Member Sussman and commented that they appreciated Member O'Brien taking the initiative to ensure that the DOE policy was consistent with the other HPB policies. Member Birdman then moved approval of Policy 12: Determination of Eligibility as Significant Heritage Preservation Resource as proposed. Member Sussman seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VII. OTHER BUSINESS A: Explore the History of Your Home - Committee Report Committee Members Moore, Weber and Birdman shared information relative to their most recent meeting pointing out that they would like to propose the creation of an interactive city map where residents could input photos and information for their properties all in one spot. They pointed out that they foresee the process operating much like Wikipedia. Member Birdman explained that potentially this project could be a joint effort with both the HPB-and the Edina Historical Society since much of Edina's historic property information is housed at the museum. He added that a great deal of the property information currently exists in the government files, and how to best manipulate the data to meet the community's needs must be determined. Member Sussman opined that the concept has good application, however he wondered whether the public would respond - that being said, he also noted it would be important to give them a chance. Discussion then ensued regarding ways they could gage public interest in the project. The board agreed that interactive .sites such as Facebook could garner opinions. Ideas such writing a blog, and a shout -out on city ektra_Were also mentioned. Member Sussman wondered if the student members on the HPB might not have an interest in this project; and Member Moore suggested contacting Edina High School reunion web sites to garner interest. Member Sussman questioned if there might not be a similar project currently underway that we could learn from. The board agreed that it would make sense to do some research to see if there are any models out there that could be replicated. Member Sussman also pointed out that a high school class might find such research interesting. 2 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes January 14, 2014 Member Birdman observed that he has heard some really good ideas; however execution is the key element for good ideas. Looking to the future, Mr. Birdman suggested having tangible tasks and .a time frame established by the March meeting. The board agreed that was an excellent idea. No formal action was taken. B. Wooddale Bridge - Potential National Register Designation Planner ` Repya reported that the Wooddale Bridge (in front of St. Stephen's Church) has been accepted fora National Register Nomination Study under the supervision of MnDOT CRU. The City's engineering department received confirmation from Lisa Karlgaard with LHB, Inc., where she explained that Greg Mathis, Sr. Preservation Planner & Architectural Historian with 106 Group will be a sub consultant for the study. Ms. Karlgaard explained in her letter that the MnDOT CRU office suggests that the National Register listing be completed prior to the city pursuing the local designation of the bridge. That being the case, the local heritage landmark designation of Wooddale Bridge which is part of the HPB 2014 work plan will probably occur later in the year. Member Sussman advised the board that he had done some research on both the Browndale Bridge and the Wooddale Bridge and discovered some Minneapolis newspaper articles from 1907 corrected the 1937 Country Club Crier account of the calamity of 1907 when both bridges washed away. Mr. Sussman shared the article /photographs with Planner Repya who has since forwarded them on to Greg Mathis, from the 106 Group who as previously mentioned, will be writing the National Register designation study. Board members thanked Member Sussman for his diligence and agreed that they'looked forward to learning more about the Wooddale Bridge. C. HPB Notebooks - Update Ordinances Board members received updates for their HPB notebooks with instructions as to where to insert the information. The information included updated city codes as well as data referencing the board's actions over the past year. Planner Repya explained that she will periodically provide updated information for the notebooks to ensure that the data is current and continues to be a relevant resource for board members. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS -None IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Sussman shared the following: • He announced for the record that Member Christiaansen had a healthy baby boy, Frederick (Freddie). The board agreed to extend their best wishes to Ms. Christiaansen and her family. • He attended the recent Edina Historical Society meeting where members of the Oliver Kelley Grange (OKG) were introduced. The OKG will hold their monthly meetings in Edina Heritage Preservation Board Minutes January 14, 2014 our Minnehaha Grange Hall, and in return, they will provide interpretative services for Edina. These people are very skilled - providing interpretations for the Minnesota Historical Society at the Mill City-Museum; and this collaboration is a wonderful opportunity for Edina. X. STAFF- COMMENTS Planner Repya reported that the annual state preservation conference which is held in. September each year is taking on a different twist this' year. St.- Paul is honored to host the American Association for State and Local History annual tonference' on September 17 =2Q 2014. Having at least one board member attend this conference will serve Edina's Certified Local Government (CLG) requirements. Ms. Repya added that as with the state conference, scholarships will, be available to assist in,-the registration fees, and-:she would provide more detailed information in the future. XI. NEXT MEETING DATE February I It 2014 X11. ADJOURNMENT 8:40 p.m. Member Birdman moved for adjournment at 8:40 p.m. Member Mellom seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Re_pya 4 MINUTES OF THE _. REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 8, 2013 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Schroeder, Fischer, Platteter, Forrest Grabiel, Halva, Kilberg, Staunton Absent from the roll: Carr, Potts III. APPROVAL-OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Grabiel moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Scherer moved approval of the December 11, 2013 meeting minutes. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, Commissioner Fischer moved to close community comment. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public comment closed. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan — Taco Bell 3210 Southdale Circle Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing Taco Bell building and rebuild a new slightly smaller building at 3210 Southdale Circle. Teague reported that the applicant would proceed with Site Plan review and variance approval to redevelop the site. Appearing for the Applicant Barbara Schneider, for Border Foods Companies Comments /Questions Commissioner Grabiel asked if the houses directly to the east of the subject property are in Edina. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Forrest noted a discrepancy in parking spaces referenced and depicted on the site plan and asked the applicant to be clear on that figure when they bring their application forward. Forrest asked where setback is established. Teague responded setback is established from the property lines. Commissioner Scherer commented that she wondered if the audio box/menu board could be located on the new building in a location similar to McDonald's audio box/menu board south side. Planner Teague responded that it appears the proposed plans depict a five vehicle stacking queue, which may prohibit that, adding the applicant would need to answer that question. Applicant Presentation Ms. Schneider addressed the Commission and explained Border Foods is proposing to tear down and rebuild the existing Taco Bell restaurant. Taco Bell has been operating at the Edina location since 1986, adding the proposed rebuilt is 27 GSF smaller than the existing building; however, it is 23'5" longer. Schneider explained the circulation on the site in one way and the same is proposed with the new structure. Schneider acknowledged that the request requires variance; however, she believes the increase in landscaping and turning radius in the one -way circulation pattern provides a better more efficient and safe site. Schneider also noted this layout allows for better placement of the audio box/menu board. Comments /Questions Chair Staunton asked Ms. Schneider if Border is concerned about their long range plans. Staunton pointed out the property adjacent to the north is available and wondered if any interest was given to speak with those property owners. Ms. Schneider responded they approached the property owners to the north (Best Buy) and inquired if they had any desire to purchase the Taco Bell site and incorporate it into their site; however, to. date there has been no movement from the owners of the Best Buy site one way or another Commissioner Grabiel asked if building design was controlled by the corporate office. Schneider responded in the affirmative. She said Taco Bell sites are managed very carefully Continuing, Grabiel said he finds the Southdale Circle properties to be a bit unusual, noting it's unusual in Edina to have R- I residential properties abutting commercial. Planner Teague agreed, adding he would do some research on this development. Commissioner Schroeder commented that he understands Ordinance stacking requirements; however, wonders if it would be a good idea to allow some leniency when a project is redeveloped that opens up to the street providing a more pedestrian feel and creating a better pedestrian experience. Planner Teague responded,that could be looked -into pointing out the Commission continually discusses the Ordinance. Ms. Schneider interjected that Taco Bell has a stacking formula of 5 vehicles from the audio box/menu board. Schroeder noted if the building is allowed to be pulled closer to the street it may provide the right number of stacking spaces to relocate the audio box/menu board. Ms. Schneider responded that they will look into that suggestion; however, one item they need to keep in mind is.the location of:the transformer. Chair Staunton asked if the site is buffered on the east. Ms. Schneider responded that presently there is a fence to the east. Schneider said with the buildings rearrangement they hope to be able to add Spruce trees; which is her opinion would provide better screening for the residential properties. Schneider also added that deciduous trees are planted on the neighbors' side of the fence. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern with the potential for cars idling as they wait for pickup, adding she wants everything done to minimize wait time creating a better environment, for the residential property owners to the east. Commissioner Platteter questioned if this would be a good area to construct sidewalks (if there aren't any); pointing out there is a big push for sidewalks in the area especially if redevelopment occurs on both the Best Buy and Wickes site. Continuing, Platteter asked if any patio seating is planned. Ms. Schneider responded that the site is very tight and no outdoor seating is anticipated. Commissioner Halva questioned if there could be two boards one on the north and one on the south. Ms. Schneider responded the south location could be difficult because a certain radius needs to be provided so the building isn't hit by vehicles. Chair Staunton said anything that can be done to minimize impact from the audio box/menu board would be appreciated. The discussion ensued on the following points; possible tweaking of the audio board /menu board and parking. It was again noted the discrepancy in parking stalls; however, the Commission acknowledged if doable they would rather see landscaping and screening instead of concrete. Continuing, the Commission stressed the importance of "being a good neighbor" and reiterated the importance of doing everything possible to reduce the impact of this establishment from the residential properties to the east. 'It was further discussed and acknowledged that in many instances the Ordinance tends to over Park sites; however, in`this instance they want assurances parking would be adequate. Commissioners questioned if the majority of the traffic at this location is drive- through traffic. Ms. Schneider responded in the affirmative. The Commission asked Ms. Schneider when formal application is submitted to prove that parking will be adequate. Planner Teague reported that, he in reviewing Google earth he found there are sidewalks along the east side of York Avenue and the sidewalk continues on the Richfield side 'of Xerxes Avenue. Commissioner Fischer asked out of curiosity what the 'down time" is on a tear down /rebuild of this nature. Ms: Schneider responded. that tear down and rebuild. can be accomplished within 90 -days barring. unforeseen obstacles: Chair Staunton thanked Ms. Schneider for presenting the sketch plan,, reiterating the importance of providing screening for the residential properties to the east. B. Tree Ordinance Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Commissioners Claudia Carr and Michael Platteter drafted an Ordinance regarding tree preservation. Teague said the draft was circulated to staff with staff raising the following concerns /questions: Enforcement. General enforcement of the ordinance, including monitoring newly planted trees in the first three years of their life may require additional staffing. The city forester is a part time position. • Two for one replacement. This may be restrictive? • Requirement of native trees. The forester is concerned that a limitation to native species would take away options for property owners to make individual decisions. • Violation Penalties. The city attorney recommends that number (13) be eliminated. Violations are covered in another section of the code. Additionally, the city attorney does not believe that the city has statutory authority to impose this type of penalty. In practice, the city would not issue a Certificate of Occupancy until the violations have been corrected. • Preservation Easement. The city attorney recommends number (8) is eliminated as it is only a recommendation. • Added cost for residents. With additional information required on a survey, there will be an added cost. Commissioner Presentation Commissioner Platteter addressed the Commission and explained that he along with Commissioner Carr wanted to craft an Ordinance that "got our foot in the door" with regard to tree preservation. Platteter said they chose to limit the scope of the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance to tear downs /re- builds. Platteter explained that teardown and rebuilds appeared to be a good place to start because they have created holes in the City's tree canopy. Concluding, Platteter stated; again, this is only a start. Comments /Questions Commissioner Scherer asked Commissioner Platteter under (2) Definitions: Removable Tree how they arrived at the list of removable trees. Commissioner Platteter responded that they researched the subject and for the most part chose trees that are typically thought of as nuisance. Platteter said he also believes any tree not listed or not found under Significant Mature Tree would be removable trees. Platteter commented that the wording "Significant Mature" could be changed to "Protected ". Chair Staunton asked Planner Teague to comment on his findings. Planner Teague explained that staffing enforcement would be a concern, adding it's possible that the Redevelopment Coordinator could'fold -some of these "duties" into her work load, cautioning much would depend on Ordinance wording. Teague also observed if the City through Ordinance were to require trees to be depicted on the surveys that would be an additional cost to the homeowner. Chair Staunton said he understands the Commissioners approach with regard to teardown /rebuilds; however, he noted large additions could have the same impact on the tree canopy. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Fischer said at least in his experience there is a .lot of peer pressure in the community to retain and maintain the City's forest. Residents don't typically cut down a tree unless necessary. Commissioner Grabiel questioned how /who would enforce the two for one, or one for one replacement suggestion; and if violating that caveat of the Ordinance would be considered criminal. Grabiel said he wouldn't want to see the Ordinance go in that direction. Commissioners discussed the issue of enforcement and wondered if -tree replacement could be tied to the escrow funds. Commissioner-Forrest commented that in her opinion this is a good start. Commissioner Scherer stated that she didn't recall finding a definition of preservation easement, adding number 8 as mentioned by staff is only a_ recommendation. Commissioner Grabiel commented that it may be easier to just require replacement of all trees removed. The discussion ensued with Commissioners agreeing that enforcement of tree replacement could become problematic; however, liked the idea of enforcement linked to the escrow. Commissioner Scherer commented that she understands the "nuisance" concern for buckthorn and other types of trees; however, thinks that more consideration should be placed on the size of the tree removed and not so much the variety. Scherer stated in her opinion it is good to have different species of trees especially because of the potential for disease. Also removing a large tree that is considered undesirable does have impact. Commissioner Schroeder said he was pleased at this-start pointing out`maintaining the urban forest is part of the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing, Schroeder said he agrees with the observation shared by Commissioner Scherer on tree size. He pointed out Cottonwoods are large trees with a very large canopy and if they are permitted to be removed the impact is tremendous. Schroeder stated in his opinion trees that; provide canopy need to be replaced and replacement at I -I may not be adequate. "Schroeder also noted the preservation of the canopy isn't limited to a site; canopy is enjoyed by many. Concluding, Schroeder said in certain instances he doesn't believe a two for one replacement is onerous. Commissioner Forrest commented that she agrees with Schroeder and Scherer on their observations; however, smaller lots may not be able to support the two for one replacement suggested by Schroeder. Schroeder responded that the two for one doesn't necessarily need to be accomplished on the site. A tree could be planted in the City parks adding to the urban forest and canopy. Chair Staunton thanked Commissioners Platteter and Carr, adding the proposed draft was a great start and the Commission looks forward to more work on this topic. A discussion ensued on. the timing of proceeding with discussions on the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance with Commissioners agreeing that another draft is needed so the discussion could proceed. It was agreed that the Commission would address another draft at a future meeting. C. Subdivision .Ordinance Planner Presentation Planner Teague introduced to the Commission a draft revision of the current Subdivision Ordinance and asked for Commissioners for their comments. Comments Commissioner Forrest said at first glance she was interested in considering the plat vs. shrinking the neighborhood option; however, without a "clear" definition of plat that would be difficult. Planner Teague agreed that defining plat would be difficult. Commissioner Fischer commented that in his opinion the perceived problems with the Subdivision Ordinance comes in phases; questioning if amending the Subdivision Ordinance definition of "neighborhood" from 500 -feet to 250 -feet really solves the issue. Fischer said it may be best if the Commission used the common sense approach and worked within the Ordinance as it is. Commissioner Grabiel said maybe it would be clearer to define "neighborhood" according to the plat. Commissioner Platteter commented that if the Commission decided in favor of defining "neigliborhood" by plat would that keep Edina in the past. Continuing, Platteter said defining "neighborhood" by plat could create other unforeseen issues. Concluding, Platteter said if any change were to be made he would be in favor of ,, reducing the "neighborhood" to 250 4eet. A, discussion ensued on what defines neighborhood character. Commissioner Forrest said her concern is that she wants assurances the residents know what to expect. It was noted the City does have an Ordinance that addresses subdivision. Commissioner Scherer said in her opinion the Commission should weave the Ordinance as is. Chair Staunton agreed and said for lots smaller than 75 -feet in width and less-than 9,000 square feet in area the Ordinance has worked through the variance process. A discussion ensued with Commissioners deciding that at this time they do not want to move forward on amending the current subdivision ordinance. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials. Back of packet materials also included a 2013 Planning Commission /Council Work sheet the indicated PC and CC actions. Commissioners thanked Teague for this update - it was further suggested that this be forwarded to the City Council and become a yearly "hand- out ". VI11. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS Chair Staunton noted that he along with Planner Teague have been trying for some time to set up a work session with the City Attorney, Roger Knutson. Staunton stated dates for the work session with the Commission agreeing that Saturday, March 22nd 9 -Noon- at the Senior Center would work provided the room is available. Teague stated he would check with the Senior Center and get back with the Commission. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Planner Teague apprised the Commission that in 2013 the City permitted 127 new houses. __.. 120-were tear_down /r_ebuilds_ and Twere new-houses on_ vacant. lots. - -. - - - X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Scherer moved meeting adjournment at 9:10 PM. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried. �Rackte dri°°s Respectfully submitted r^ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JANUARY 22,,2014 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Answering the roll call were: Scherer, Schroeder, Fischer, Potts, Kilberg, Halva, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Staunton Absent from the roll: Grabiel I11. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Commissioner Potts moved approval of the meeting agenda. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Carr moved approval of the January 8, 2014, meeting minutes. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Chair Staunton asked if anyone would like to speak; being none, Commissioner Potts moved to close community comment. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; public comment closed. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Richard Sahara — 5508 Dever Drive, Edina, MN Chair Staunton explained that the applicant has requested that this item be continued. Page 1 of 6 B. Sketch Plan Review — 3923 West 49th Street,'Edina, MN Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down a single - family home and construct a double dwelling unit at 3923 49`h Street. The property is located adjacent to the 506 and France retail area; just north of the former Edina Realty Building site, now owned by the City of Edina, and'east of a four story apartment building. The applicant would seek a Rezoning to R -2 to allow the use; and several Variances. Teague ,explained that the applicant is proposing an energy efficient building that would include rooftop solar panels, a reduction in lumber costs due to framing techniques, and a 5% increase in energy efficiency. Teague concluded that the proposed zoning to R -2 would be consistent with the R -2 zoning to the north and west. Teague pointed out there are four sites zoned R- I on 49`h Street West, and thirteen sites zoned R -2. In general, the duplexes on 49`'' Street West serve as a transition of land uses between the single - family homes to the north, and the commercial area at 50`' and France. Appearing for the Applicant Mathias Mortenson Applicant Presentation Mr. Mortenson addressed the Commission and explained his client is.an empty nester that is ready to move out of the house and move into a home that includes self - sufficient first floor living to serve their needs as they age. Mortenson, also reported an elevator would be added to allow for access from the below grade parking to the upper floors. Continuing, with graphics Mortenson pointed out the sustainable elements of the project to include rooftop solar panels, advanced framing techniques, high efficiency glazing, permeable hardscaping, materials with recycled content, low -flow fixtures among others. Concluding, Mortenson said their goal is to be very considerate of the area and built a two -story double home with common entry and underground garage. Mortenson stood for questions. Comments Chair Staunton asked Mr. Mortenson how access to the garages is gained. Mr. Mortenson explained that access for both units would be from the front street. Each unit is designed to have its own curb cut, driveway and garage access. Page 2 of 6 Chair Staunton noted that the subject site abuts a commercial area and the City's public ramp and asked about the potential for future expansion or redevelopment. Planner Teague responded there is potential for ramp expansion and the City has also discussed adding,an additional level; however, an Amend_ ment to the Comprehensive Plan would be needed to proceed. Mr. Mortenson said that the topography works in their favor adding he understands if anything is proposed for change on the abutting properties they would be made aware of those changes. Chair Staunton said his one concern was if an additional level was added to the, ramp it may block sun from the solar panels. Continuing, Staunton stated he certainly understands the rezoning request pointing out that R -2 has been a traditional buffer between commercial and R -I residential. Commissioner Carr commented that she understands the request to rezone; however, has a concern with the driveway and the height of the retaining walls needed for garage access. She asked Mr. Mortenson if he knows the height of the retaining walls and what would be needed to support the driveway and access to the garages. Mr. Mortenson responded that he believes the retaining walls could be as high as 9 %2 -feet with two' curb cuts on the lot to access the garages. Continuing, Commissioner Carr noted that the curb cuts on both sides of the units could create some safety issues especially because of the high retaining walls. She said she would hate to see someone fall off those walls. Mr. Mortenson responded that landscaping would be added:along with a guard rail to ensure safety. Mortenson said he wants the feel and look of the building to be residential and softened with landscaping and other elements. Commissioner Potts suggested,that the applicant meet with City staff to discuss drainage measures between now and formal application. Potts said at first glance the proposal makes sense with, regard, to. the rezoning; however, more specifics are needed especially on drainage to ensure,a,good project. Mr. Mortenson said the design team will consider ways to create more permeable driveways and patio areas,and implement other measures to address drainage. Potts further suggested that at the time of application that all calculations be correct on lot coverage, setback, etc. Commissioner Forrest acknowledged the sustainable measures implemented for the project; however, pointed out a tear down: is harder on the environment than remodel. Continuing, Forrest said she is also concerned with the variances and the lack of outdoor space. Forrest questioned why two units. Mr. Mortenson responded that the client could look at the rationale of a second unit to provide a financial benefit or the client may wish to combine families. Mortenson stated that the request.to rezone made sense given the apartment building to the east and. multiple double dwelling units on the same block. Mortenson did acknowledge that the rezoning request would trigger the need for variances; reiterating they felt rezoning to a double made sense. Page 3 of 6 Commissioner Carr stated she agrees the rezoning makes sense; it's a good land use choice; however, she said she continues to be concerned with the two driveways. Carr said it's not only a safety issue for her but an aesthetic issue. She suggested revisiting this concept. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Teague how this area is guided in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded the Comp Plan guides this area as low_ density attached residential. Schroeder commented that it appears the rezoning moves this parcel more into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Continuing, Schroeder said he can support the rezoning; pointing out this parcel is also adjacent to an apartment building and other multiples. Schroeder also added he is concerned with guest parking and the common areas, adding that may need to be revisited. Mr. Mortenson said in this area guest parking is accommodated on the street or in the driveways. He also noted the near public ramp parking and the adjacent apartment building has a guest lot. Commissioner Carr complemented Mr. Mortenson on his interest in developing a sustainable building. r Commissioner Forrest stated she really likes the concept of the shared front door and the flexibility this design provides for residents to "age in place ". Commissioner Kilberg. said he applauds the project; however would like to see a more enhanced street view. Kilber-g said in his opinion character needs to be added to the structure to give it a more residentiAfeel. A landscaping should als6'be developed. Chair Staunton commented that the proposed new home(s) sits on a hill and asked Mortenson if he knows how the height of the old and; new buildings compares. Mr. Mortenson responded that he believes the new structure would be higher than what exists today; possibly by six -feet. Chair Staunton said in summary he believes the request to rezone the subject site and build a double dwelling unit makes sense; however, there are concerns with drainage, building design, profile, garage access and building height that heed to be further addressed and clarified: Planner Teague informed Mr. Mortenson that the Sketch Plan will be forwarded to the City Council for their feedback before formal application is made. Chair Staunton suggested to Mr. Mortenson that he provide the City Council with a narrative explaining their intent and final goal. C. Tree Preservation Ordinance _ Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission that this was discussed at their previous meeting on January 8`h. Teague thanked Commissioners Platter and Carr for their work on the Tree Page 4 of 6 Ordinance and reported that at this time the City's attorney is reviewing the language, adding at first look the Attorney is considering placing this Ordinance in 41 I /Residential Reconstruction Comments /Discussion Chair Staunton observed that it may make sense to place it there; however, 411 only addresses tear down rebuilds. Commissioner Platteter said the revisions to the proposed Tree Ordinance were to capture canopy width, protected tree removal one for one, trees not identified as a protected species removable and capture a more inclusive "tree family" protected list. Commissioner. Carr said their research found that in general language referred to "family of trees" and questioned if omitting the "species" list adding "family of trees" would serve the Ordinance better. Chair Staunton said in reference to species or family of trees it has always been difficult to know if too inclusive or less is best in any Ordinance language. Commissioner Schroeder commented that in his opinion in this instance the City may want the advice of the City Forester in determining tree preservation. He said defining "family of trees" can be very complicated. Schroeder, referred to the Ordinance part 2 6. B. disease resistant as another instance where Forester input would be valuable. He pointed out in #5 it indicates if a protected tree is less than 5" in caliper, it must be moved to another location on the property, if impacted by areas in paragraph (7) below ". Schroeder said not all trees of that size are worth moving, and in his opinion the City should have the forester review the tree before it's moved. Concluding, Schroeder said his focus and sensitivity is to the impact provided by the existing canopy of all trees and if that canopy is lost regardless of the tree, protected or not, that canopy is sorely missed and the Tree Ordinance should address this loss. Platteter said he agrees with Commissioner Schroeder about the importance of the tree canopy; however found it difficult to write an ordinance that would reflect that. Commissioner Scherer stated that in her opinion the Ordinance should be clearer; she noted "demo permits" and "building permits" are also required for internal modifications, adding a tree inventory should not be requiredf,.for internal modifications. Commissioners agreed. Scherer also noted she recently had a bathroom updated, adding that required multiple building permits; however, in no way impacted trees. Concluding, Scherer said the intent of the proposed Ordinance needs to be clearer, adding originally she thought that this Ordinance applied to only tear down rebuilt properties. Commissioner Platteter said the intent of the tree ordinance is to require a tree inventory for teardown rebuilds and any house modification that requires a building permit or demolition permit. Page 5 of 6 Commissioner Forrest said she likes the way the Ordinance is written; pointing out a permit is required for a new roof, adding roofers should be made aware of the trees on the site and keep their protection in mind during the roofing process. Commissioner Scherer reiterated in her opinion further clarification is needed; especially with #12. Chair Staunton commented that when considering the suggestion from the City Attorney to place the Tree Ordinance in 411 in his opinion that location may not work. He pointed out as previously mentioned 411 is drafted solely for teardowns and rebuilds. Commissioner Platteter acknowledged that point, reiterating the intent of this Ordinance applies to anything that modifies. a house size plus tear downs rebuilds. Staunton agreed adding the Commission isn't interested in inserting ourselves unless there is structural 'modification going on. Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Potts questioned if the trees would be required to be depicted on a survey or some type of tree inventory document. Commissioners Platteter and Carr commented their intent at this time was to require a tree inventory; however there are options, the tree inventory can be depicted on the survey, but if not, a separate document would be required. The discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement to move forward with the Tree Ordinance; however, tweak it as discussed for final draft review at the next Commission meeting on February 26`h. The final draft would be forwarded to the City Council for their comments and review. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials, Council Connection and Attendance. VI11. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS IX. STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Fischer moved meeting adjournment at 8:15 PM. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. I T11- 10100 M--A Page 6 of 6 . MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 3, 2014 9:49 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 9:16 p:m. . ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle,- Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Meeting Agenda, removing Item VI. Authorization to fund-capital improvements at 501h and France Parking Ramps. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF January 7, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Brindle approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina, Housing and Redevelopment Authority for January 7, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -01 ADOPTED APPROVING THE DECERTIFICATION OF THE GRANDVIEW HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUB - DISTRICT Finance Director Wallin explained the Grandview Tax Increment District was decertified in 2012, however, the tax increment continued to be received until debt relating to hazardous substance removal was paid. Mr. Wallin noted the debt had now been paid and the hazardous substance sub- district may now be decertified. He said HRH's Financial Consultant Ehlers, Inc. had drafted a resolution that would allow city staff to sign the necessary documents to decertify the sub - district with Hennepin County. Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Sprague made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2014 -01 approving the decertification of the Grandview Hazardous Substance Sub - district. Commissioner Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:52 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director f4- Ii 0 tesu To: Members of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item M HRA V. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Authorization to Fund Capital Improvements at 50th and France Parking Ramps Action Requested: Authorize use of existing TIF funds to pay for $2,375,000 of proposed capital improvements to the City/ HRA -owned parking ramps and related wayfinding at 50th and France. Information / Background: Kimley -Horn Associates prepared a Feasibility Study for Improvements No. P -23 to the public parking ramps at 50th and France. The total proposed budget is $5,685,000. See attached Executive Summary for a description of the project. Repair and maintenance items are estimated to cost $3,310,000 while the estimate for capital improvements is $2,375,000. Since the late 1960's, the City has worked together with private business owners to build, operate and maintain shared public parking to support nearly 500,000 square feet of commercial, space at 50th and France. Original construction of the South, Middle and North Ramps was funded by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Tax increment financing was typically used for construction costs. Like the current proposal, operating and maintenance costs were historically funded by the business owners who benefit from the ramps. At this time, $2,375,000 is requested from the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund to make vital capital improvements to the three public parking ramps at 50th and France. This amount will fund the highest priority capital improvements which include: • brighter lighting in all ramps, • pedestrian access improvements, • new elevator in South Ramp, • dynamic wayfinding system and • new irrigation system. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Additional capital improvements, including an additional elevator and exterior screening, have also been discussed. These have been deemed lower priority by the Project Management and Project Advisory Teams and not considered feasible at this time. Additional capital improvements such as these could be reconsidered in the future based on availability of funds. At this time, the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund has a balance of approximately $6:0 million that is not yet committed. This amount is expected to increase to approximately $9.2 million after final incremental taxes are collected in December 2014. There are numerous potential demands on these TIF funds in addition to the $2,375,000 currently requested. The City's Capital Improvement Plan identifies several. infrastructure projects that are anticipated to use TIF funds for completion. Over the past year, the City Council has also expressed interest in directing funds to spark reinvestment in the 50 /France, Grandview and Wooddale/Valleyview Districts. The attached table identifies the potential demands on the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund that have been identified in the past year. It should be noted that there are inadequate funds to allow all identified projects to be realized in 2014 and 2015. Strategic choices will need to be made so that the available funds can be used efficiently and effectively. From 2015 -2023, the balance of the TIF Fund is anticipated to be replenished after the Southdale Center repays its $5 million loan. This phased repayment could be used to fund public improvements that are identified through the process of updating the City's Capital Improvement Plan. Attachments: Executive Summary of Improvement P -23 (3- pages) Anticipated Demands on Centennial Lakes TIF Funds (I -page) .t %' CITY OF EDINA 50th & FRANCE DISTRICT PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Feasibility Study and Report has been prepared for the 50th & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements. The proposed project includes repair, rehabilitation and future expansion of parking, a new parking wayfmding system, and repair and rehabilitation of the landscape and streetscape elements. The proposed scope of the improvements is generally as follows: • Add 140 to 200 new parking stalls through a public / private partnership on the 3930 West 49 '/z Street property (formerly the Edina Realty building) and / or other sites in the 50th & France District. This goal will be pursued as a separate project. • Perform essential parking ramp repairs and preventative maintenance to the parking ramps. • Paint the interior of all parking ramps and the exterior of the South Ramp. • Replace deteriorated pavers with more salt tolerant pavers and improve drainage system below pavers. • Replace dying street trees and repair planter beds. • Screen all garbage areas with enclosure walls (two at Middle Ramp and one at South Ramp) and implement recycling centers. • New elevator and stair core in northeast comer of the South Ramp. • Increase brightness of parking ramp lighting by replacing existing fixtures with motion sensing LED fixtures. • Install a dynamic public parking wayfmding system. • Install an automatic underground irrigation system to serve two planter areas on south side of Middle Ramp. • Create easily identified pedestrian zones to and through parking ramps using floor paint, curbs and bollards. • Enhanced operations and maintenance of the parking ramps including power washing all ramps once per year, improved sanitation and quarterly cleaning of all glass. • Add hospitality signs at the entrance and exit of parking ramps. • Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor employee parking demand. • Work with Metro Transit to add bus route and schedule signs, benches and bus shelters, and possibly real -time bus arrival information. The estimated costs for the proposed improvements are summarized below. These costs include a 20 percent construction cost contingency and a 30 percent allowance for indirect costs such as engineering, administrative, and legal items as well as capitalized interest. Items in italics would be assessed under Chapter 429. N, Proposed Capital Improvements Estimated Cost D.1 Increase Brightness of Lighting' $ 650,000 E.1 Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access $ 100,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp $ 1,100,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System $ 350,000 G.1 Paint All Ramp Interior and South Ramp Exterior Surfaces $ 1,375, 000 G.6 Screen All Garbage Areas $ 60,000 H.1 Replace Dead/ Dying Trees $ 25,000 H.2 Replace Broken Pavers $ 500,000 H ., 13 Automatic Irrigation System $ 175,000 H.14 Repair Planter Beds $ 50,000 I.1 Essential Ramp Repairs $ 650, 000 I.2 Preventative Ramp Maintenance $ 650,000 Total Capital Cost $ 5,685,000 Proposed Additional Annual Maintenance Improvements Estimated Cost B.3 Holiday Season Parking Strategies $ 35,000 E.3 New Elevator and Stair in South Ramp Maintenance $ 10,000 F.3 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System Maintenance $ 10,000 G.3 Power Washing on Annual Basis $ 30,000 G.4 Improve Sanitation $ 10,000 H.13 Automatic Irrigation System Maintenance $ 5,000 I.2 Escrow for Future Periodic Preventative Maintenance $ 100,000 Total Additional Annual Maintenance Cost $ 200,000 The improvements are proposed to be financed through a combination of assessments, parking permit revenues, and other city funds. The following is a summary of the estimated funding amounts from each of the proposed financing sources: Capital Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Other City Funds Total $ 3,310,000 $ 2,375,000 $ 5,685,000 Additional Annual Maintenance Cost Financing Source Amount Assessments Parking Permit Revenues Total $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ -200,000 Annual operations and maintenance costs have been in the range of $250,000 per year for the past few years. The Additional Annual Maintenance Cost of $200,000 is in addition to- the historic average cost. _ Rebates for installing energy efficient light may be available from Xcel Energy to offset a portion of the cost of the lights. The amount of rebates offered by Xcel varies from time to time and would be determined at the time of design and construction. ii '/r The following is a proposed schedule for the implementation of the improvements. City Council Receive Feasibility Report, Call for Public Hearing, and Authorize Preparation of Final Plans and Specifications January 21, 2014 Public Hearing, City Council Orders Project , Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Ad for Bids February 18, 2014 Bid Opening May 22, 2014 Assessment Hearing / Award Contract June 3, 2014 Edina Art Fair June 6 -8, 2014 Start 2014 Construction June 16, 2014 Interim Construction Completion October 2014 2014 Holiday Shopping Season Nov -Dec, 2014 Start 2015 Construction March 2015 Edina Art Fair June 2015 Construction Complete October 2015 The focus of construction in 2014 would be the dynamic wayfinding system, lighting upgrade, pedestrian access improvements, streetscape improvements, parking structure repairs and preventative maintenance. In order to mitigate impacts to businesses during construction, construction of the new stair and elevator core for the South Ramp and interior and exterior ramp painting is assumed to occur in 2015. The resulting project construction schedule will be longer than if all work is completed concurrently. Based upon the analysis completed as a part of this report, the proposed 50`t' & France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements are feasible, necessary, and cost effective and would benefit the properties and businesses in the project area and the City of Edina. iii 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Anticipated Demands on Centennial Lakes TIF Funds (2013 -2023) Year -end .balance December 31, 2012 = $11,607,171 Anticipated $5,000,000 $2,957,769 NOTE Approximate costs are unaudited and estimates. February 11, 2014 DESCRIPTION Anticipated •s COST o BALANCE Centennial bebt service and Redevelopment"Agreement, Jan 2013 Completed - $1,155,369 $10,451,802 Lakes Redevelopment Agreement, Jan 2014 Committed - $545,457 $9,906,345 France Ave - design & urban.planning, Oct 2013. .- Completed - $265,000 $9,641,345 France Ave (CIP 13 -003)- construction; phase 1(estimate), June 2014 Committed - $2,000,000 $7,641,345 France Ave - reimbursement for R -O -W construction by B erl s estimate Committed - $400,000 $7,241,345 France Ave - construction contingency (20 %) Committed - $600,000 $6,641,345 - $929,000 $5,132,769 France Ave - construction site engineering, 2014 Committed - $285,000 $6,356,345 Greater Promenade Phase IV - feasibility study, May 2013 Completed - $33,000 $6,323,345 Promenade, Phase IV - engineering design (estimate), Oct 2013 Committed - $80,000 $6,243,345 Southdale $3,532,769 Promenade - Phase IV (CIP #11 -002) - construction, June 2014 Committed - $600,000 $5,643,345 Promenade - Phase V concept planning (estimated) Completed - $20,000 $5,623,345 Hazelton Rd & Promenade - construction contingency (20%), June 2014 Committed - $340,000 $5,283,345 - $3,000,000 Hazelton Rd / BA417 - feasibility study, Mar 2013 Completed - $23,000 $5,260,345 - $2,375,000 Hazelton Rd / BA417 - engineering design, June 2013 Committed - $115,000 $5,145,345 Pentagon Park Redevelopment planning (estimated) Completed - $80,000 $5,065,345 50th & purchase of Edina Realty building, Jan to June 2013 Completed - $2,750,000 $2,315,345 France potential land purchase (estimated) Completed 7$70,000 $2,245,345 Adminis- trative General administration costs 2013 -2014 (estimate) Completed - $20,000 $2,225,345 Incremental Taxes collected July & Dec 2013 Completed $3,777,261 $6,002,606 Incremental Taxes collected July & Dec 2014 Estimated $3,259,163 $9,261, 769 Anticipated $5,000,000 $2,957,769 NOTE Approximate costs are unaudited and estimates. February 11, 2014 Land Acquisition - bus garage (estimate) Anticipated - $2,000,000 $7,261;769 Site clearance & remediation - bus garage (estimate) Anticipated - $500,000 $6,761,769 Grandview Infrastructure /transportation study, 2014 Anticipated - $400,000 $6,361,769 Redevelopment Planning, PW site, 2014 Anticipated - $1001000 $6,261,769 Wooddale / Redevelopment Study 2014 (estimated) Anticipated - $200,000 $6,061;769 Valle iew Hazelton Rd / BA417- construction (estimate), June 2014 Anticipated - $929,000 $5,132,769 France Ave - (CIP -13 -003) construction; phase 2 landscape & Anticipated - $1,000,000 $4,132,769 streetsca a (estimate , Oct 2014 Greater CIP 4HRA -11 -003 - France Ave. at Hwy. 62 intersection Anticipated - $600,000 $3,532,769 Southdale improvements CIP #HRA -13 -001- Greater Southdale Transportation Study Anticipated - $200,000 $3,332,769 CIP #HRA -13 -002 - Pedestrian Bridge overTH62 Anticipated - $3,000,000 $332,769 50th & 50th & France - capital improvements to existing ramps Under - $2,375,000 - $2,042,231 France - Review 10ther projects determined in 2014 CIP review process TBD $0 - $2,042,231 Repayment of Southdale Center TIF loan (2015 -2023) Anticipated $5,000,000 $2,957,769 NOTE Approximate costs are unaudited and estimates. February 11, 2014 roc R O R w9�N��1� o e vi may° • ''` �C!!il'nRACCP • 18 Fitt To: Members of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA VI. From: Bill Neuendorf Action Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: February 18, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Modifying Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, Establishing Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District Therein and Adopting Tax Increment Financing Plan; HRA Resolution No. 2014 -2 Action Requested: Adopf;HRA Resolution 2014 -2 Information / Background: The Pentagon Park office park, consisting of fifteen multi- tenant office buildings, was built in the late 1960s. For several decades, it was well positioned in the market place and had much success. In the past decade however, its dated layout and aging, infrastructure has made it considerable less desirable. During the January 8, 2013 City Council work session, the Pentagon Park area was one of several identified as potential locations where a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District may be warranted. Since 2004, the assessed valuation of the Pentagon Park properties has declined by 60 %. The vacancy rate of some of the buildings far exceeds that of the marketplace. Nearly every building requires significant repair after several years of deferred maintenance. The area is in need of redevelopment so that this downward trend is reversed. The City retained Ehlers & Associates as well as other professionals to inspect the existing buildings and prepare the TIF Plan and necessary modifications to the Redevelopment Project Area. LHB, Inc. inspected each building in recent months and determined that the proposed District satisfies the requirements for creation of a 26 -year TIF Redevelopment District. The report is attached for your consideration. The proposed plan has been circulated to other agencies for their review and comment as required by State law. The new owner envisions a complete transformation of the private properties in the future. While no specific design has been decided upon at this time, the future land use will include a mixture of uses and will likely require significant improvements in the public infrastructure. The establishment of a new Tax Increment Financing District would allow the City to consider -a public/private partnership in the future so that the full potential of this important business /mixed use district can be realized. Please note that the full 140 -page TIF Plan is included as an attachment on the companion City Council document (Item VI. C. Public Hearing). Attachments: HRA Resolution No. 2014 -2 (2- pages) TIF Summary (4- pages) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 a This Page Purposely Left Blank. EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -2 ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTHEAST : EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA, ESTABLISHING THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT THEREIN AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR. WHEREAS, it has been proposed by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board ") of the Edina Housing and.. Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina (the "City") that the HRA adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification "), for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Area ") and establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (the "District ") therein and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan ") therefor (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Modification and Plan "), all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047, and Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, inclusive, as amended (the "Act "), all as reflected in the Plans and presented for the Board's consideration; and WHEREAS, the HRA has investigated the facts relating to the Modification and Plan and has caused the Modification and Plan to be prepared; and WHEREAS, the HRA has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the adoption of the Modification and Plan. The HRA has also requested the City Planning Commission to provide for review. of and written comment on the Modification and Plan and that the Council schedule a public hearing on the Modification and Plan upon published notice as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board as follows: The HRA hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10, and finds that the adoption of the proposed Modification and Plan conform in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to redevelop an area of the State of Minnesota which is already built up and that the adoption of the proposed Modification and Plan will help provide employment opportunities in the State and in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City and the State because it will discourage commerce and industry from moving their operations to another state or municipality and thereby serves a public purpose. 2. The HRA further finds that the Modification and Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs for the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Project Area by private .enterprise in that the intent is to provide only that public assistance necessary to make the private developments financially feasible 3. The boundaries of the Project Area are not being expanded. 4. The reasons and facts supporting the findings in this resolution are described in the Modification and Plan. ... 5. The HRA elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the District. 6. Conditioned upon the approval thereof by the City Council following its public hearing thereon, the Modification and Plan, as presented to the HRA on this date, are hereby approved, established and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the HRA. 7. Upon approval` of the Modification and Plan by the City Council, the staff, the HRA's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Modification and Plan and for this purpose to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to.this Board for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. Approval of the Modification and Plan does not constitute approval of any project or a Development Agreement with any developer. 8. Upon approval of the Modification and Plan by the City Council, the Executive Director of the HRA is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modification and Plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a. 9. The Executive Director of the HRA is authorized and directed to forward a copy of the Modification and Plan to the Hennepin County Auditor and request that the Auditor certify the . original tax capacity of the District as described in the Plans, all in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 469.177. Approved by the Board on February 18, 2014. Chair ATTEST: Secretary STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk Ji This Page Purposely Left Blank. Tax Increment Financing District Overview City of Edina Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District The following summary contains an overview of the basic elements of the Tax Increment Financing, Plan for the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District. More detailed information on each of these topics can be found in the complete Tax Increment Financing Plan. Proposed action: ➢ Establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District (District) and the adoption of a Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF Plan). Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area which includes the establishment of the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District, which represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area. Type of TIF District: A redevelopment district Parcel Numbers: 31- 028 =24 -33 =0010 31- 028 -24 -34 -0012 31- 028 -24 -33 -0014 31- 028 -24 -33 -0013 31- 028 -24 -33 -0018 31- 028 -24 -33 -0015 31- 028 -24 -33 -0025 31- 028 -24 -34 -0007 31- 028 -24 -34 -0008 31- 028 -24 -34 -0009 31- 028 -24 -43 -0002 31- 028 -24 -43 -0001 31= 028 -24 -43 -0003 31- 028 724 -43 -0004 31- 028 -24 -43 -0005 31- 028 -24 -43 -0006 Proposed The District is being created to facilitate the multi -phase construction of Development: several hundred thousand square feet of new office space, adjacent public improvements, and other commercial development including, potentially, a hotel .in the City. Please see Appendix A of the TIF Plan for a more detailed project description. Maximum duration: The duration of the District will be 25 years from the date of receipt of the first increment (26 years of increment). The City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2018. It is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after December 31, 2043, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. Estimated annual tax Up to $6,544,578 increment: 10 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE Authorized uses: The TIF Plan contains a budget that authorizes the maximum amount that may be expended: Land/Building Acquisition ............................. .....................$1,000,000 Site Improvements / Preparation ..................... ....................$30,241,000 Public Utilities ................ ............................... .....................$1,847,000 Other Qualifying Improvements ................... ....................$39;224,000 Administrative Costs (up to 10 %) .................. ...................$18,233,791 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL .......................... ....................$90,545,791 Interest ........................... ............................... ....................$80,032,553 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL ...................... ...................5170.578.344 See Subsection 2 -10, on page 2 -6 of the TIF Plan for the full budget authorization. Form of financing: The project is proposed to be financed by a pay -as- you -go note. Administrative fee: Up to 10% of annual increment, if costs are justified. Interfund Loan If the City wants to pay for administrative expenditures from a tax increment Requirement: fund, it is recommended that a resolution authorizing a loan from another fund be passed PRIOR to the issuance of the check. 4 Year Activity Rule After four years from the date of certification of the District one of the (§ 469.176 Subd. 6) following activities must have been commenced on each parcel in the District: • Demolition • Rehabilitation • Renovation • Other site preparation (not including utility services such as sewer and water) If the activity has not been started by approximately February 2018, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel until the commencement of a qualifying activity. 5 Year Rule Within 5 years of certification revenues derived from tax increments must be (§ 469.1763 Subd. 3) expended or obligated to be expended. Any obligations in the District made after approximately February 2019, will not be eligible for repayment from tax increments. The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the TIF Plan for the District, as required pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3, are included in Exhibit A of the City resolution. Page 2 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE MAP OF THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA AND THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District �� ® yr1 p Project Area W �- E -w- �'' � Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District Englneemg Dept Cec mber,2Dt9 EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE r MAP OF THE PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT e_� e �' •.a ' 4r r n I ` "1� NL�'!1es A �� .`.• 4C i , r;e�` \ i 1 -S �� � i9' A C/ 1�.. • t o(` rti�•.` - �u� .� J L 1 �cw`�. �!'��.. ��`r. ,. y syi,`y �i DRILFCOlRSE ,j 1 \`�yQ 1 y��• q �. 7 ^ l %1 , { '4 �)ltxe]WDOEi1 � �1 Y - fit >r.T S a'trI� ' ' j� ®- �ce�.� S ■"� I ,- i, tsio:eianoore ° E���c`.�.�c'"� E •�l .L ... -' � � F x"=61 �!. ■ 'I'• f y / / _ - r *r ,,� /!••� smxexWOaxs '' +� 4 tl?roxu.wootl Ciaxexu7ooa'� )runav)! i mnau000t 7• t U[r� iFF�':.. 7 (3 uax.noora4 *—WS [ ..LA� T"srw j !. �Al } . _ ViaxexWOOi t`�>,��..-- �sxx.,1�F')� (- �_'%'7- x (__ • . �o:iiiaeo�o ?!?xixav_o«s�.a ry ,/ �."-.• ; f " r-a. r .ex «exumoix�)�otexuwee s '� ^" J t, r e Pk ayscDR ��+ r �Y �y 3 77-72 Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District e ' Proposed Pentagon Park TIF District Parcels Page 4 (W,)EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. 1�A, Cn y Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information 0 Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the Council's packet was delivered. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 r� j Deb Mangen. From: Lana Slavitt <slavitt_lana @yahoo.com> 'ent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 9:24 PM :'o: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview land Dear Council members and Mayor Hovland, I am writing to ask for your help with an, issue that I believe is important to Edina's future livability. As you know, a 3.3 acre parcel located behind Jerry's and owned by the City is currently underutilized. My understanding is the Council has started to explore selling this land to a private developer. I believe this would be a mistake. We have an opportunity to preserve this valuable land for public use through the creation of a new community center that would provide a place.for Edinans to work, play and become educated in the future. Our current community center - an old former high school building - is hardly of the caliber one would expect in a community like Edina. I would prefer that we retain our ownership of this land and explore the process of designing a real community center on par with other communities in the area. I hope that you will consider this idea before making an irreversible decision in selling one of the only city -owned sites available. Thank you! Lana Slavitt 5125 Mirror Lakes Drive .Edina, MN 55436 152 - 929 -9203 w Deb Mangen From: richieg82 @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:44 AM To: Edina.Mail Subject: Braemar Hello, I am a Braemar men's club member and I am emailing you today to show my support for consolidating and investing in Edina's golf courses. Thanks, Rich Gerlach 612- 207 -8623 It �w 41 Deb Manaen From: hovelsrud5 @comcast.net Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 11:21 AM To: Edina Mail Subject. Sale of City Land I am writing about an issue important to Edina's future. I understand the land behind Jerry's, owned by the City, is currently being considered for sale to private developers. This is of great concern to me as this land is at the heart of one of our city's centrally located hubs. We have an opportunity to preserve this valuable location for public use. Like others, I'd like to`see . consideration of a new community center that would keep us cutting edge and competitive. I hope you will consider this idea and others before making an irreversible decision in selling one of the only city -owned sites available. Surely a partnership of public and private cooperation could be a viable option. Thank you! Jennifer Hovelsrud 4425 North Ave. Edina, 55436 1 Deb Mangen From: Kent Rissman and Linda Hulbert <rissbert@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 8:28 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Closing Fred Richards - bad idea Closing Fred Richards would be very sad because not only would this golf course not exist which really introduces people to the sport in a less pressing environment making it much more fun but the pressure on Braemar will be awful. The lines will be longer; the tee times harder to get; the demand to `play ready golf' will be intense. Players will expect everyone to play at a hurried level. The impact on those of us who enjoy a day at the course will be bad enough to mean we will seldom golf in Edina. We will look for other public courses that keeps the sport fun. I would prefer you increase the cost of playing! there must be a better way to manage this. IIiFSi IT Linda Hulbert, Edina resident. Deb Mangen From: Phil Mero <phil.mero @gmail.com> ..Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 4:56 PM To: Edina Mail; abettergrandview @gmail.com Subject: SAVE GRANDVIEW DISTRICT To Whom - I would also request that you stop providing JMS (Just More S * * *) with building permits. They have ZERO regard -for the architectural integrity of our community. Start thinking about YOUR legacy as a City officials. I know I wouldn't want to be associated with the 'selling out' of Edina era. Give the citizens of Edina a chance to be heard considering the plans for Grandview: 51.46 Eden Avenue. I would hate to see another regrettable decision be made on,behalf of an invaluable piece of property. Sincerely -` Phil Mero: 612.963.0852 1 Deb Manaen From: Scott Nelson <sdnelsommn@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 8:19 PM To: Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: BRAEMAR GOLF OPERATIONS Greetings, and thank you for taking the time to read this: From: Scott Nelson .6428 Vernon Avenue Resident for 38 of the 50 years of Braemar's existence Member of the Braemar Men's Club for 20 years It is sad that the state of golf has deteriorated over the last few years for a variety of reasons, resulting in lower course usage throughout the country. We are a busy society with multiple distractions and we all have a hard time determining where best to spend our time and dollars. It would be great to keep all Edina Golf Operations as they are today, but it is time to make a difficult business decision. I applaud the effort and the emotional pleas from the 'Save the Fred' coalition. Their message is admirable, all eit based on feelings and emotions, rather than sound business logic. Golf needs to change, but that is above the pay grade of anyone involved in this decision. It is a hard game ... it is an expensive game...and it takes a long time to play. Efforts are being made nationally to come up with alternative programs to create some buzz and introduce new players. Larger holes, shorter courses, easier courses are all ideas being experimented with. Even using a soccer ball with holes the size of a manhole cover is being tossed around. These are all worthy of consideration. For that reason, I would hope that the Fred Richards property is retained by the city to repurpose into a 'golf venue at a later date with some of the innovations being discussed become reality. But for now, it is a difficult decision, but a prudent one ... to close Fred Richards at the conclusion of the 2014 season. Braemar was once one of the top public courses in the state. With the proper investment and many of the items outlined in the presentation by Mr. Neal and Ms. Kattrah, it can return to that lofty position. But there needs to be a plan. Saying, "improve customer service" is sweet sounding. How? What is the plan? And a 'consultant' may be an expensive route to find out what is obvious. What are the courses doing that make a golfer feel welcome? Ask the people that play ... they'll tell you. I'm sorry ... this is getting long. I'll be brief. It is a good plan ... not a perfect one. But the goal is the right one. Improve Braemar, raise it's stature, and people from 20 miles away will drive here to play what once was:..and can be again ... an exceptional golf venue. Thank you. Respectfully, Scott Nelson 952 - 220 -5166 1 Deb Mangen From: Heirigs, Wayde <Wayde.Heirigs @ATK.COM> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 3:35 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; swensonannl @gmail.com;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Edina Mail; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: Breamar operations proposals I have the following questions to the Park Board that I think we should have answered prior to any vote to close Fred Richards Ann two more questions It was said at the Park Board meeting that we need to close Fred Richards in order to prevent the city from having to fund the Breamar operations and closing Fred Richards will save the city $730k. Who will pay for the construction to repurpose the land that Fred Richards is on? Who will pay for the annual maintenance? I assume the answer is the city. If the city, has to pay 500K ( conservative estimate) to repurpose the land and $50K a year to maintain the land (from the Park Board consultant), then the city did not save any money. I think to complete the analysis and we need to understand the answer to these questions before we proceed. . Wayde Heirigs Vice President, Chief Accountant and Interim Treasurer Alliant Techsystems Inc. 7480 Flying Cloud Road Eden Prairie MN, 55344 Office 952 - 351 -3016 Cell 612 - 695 -7399 1 Deb Mangen From: Heirigs, Wayde <Wayde.Heirigs @ATK.COM> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 3:40 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; swensonannl @gmail.com;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Edina Mail;joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: RE: Breamar operations proposals I also have the following to Ann at the Park Board. I want to understand what the hurry is in approving the closure of Fred Richards on March 4th. It seems to me that we have time to look at other proposals and determine the best course of action. The explanations we have gotten to date do not make senses . Sincerely Wayde Ann thanks for the information. I do have a couple question. On page 11 you say If a driving range project is to begin in the fall of 2014, it is critical for a decision on the closing of FREC early in 2014. Final design, watershed approval and the bidding process will take several months Why is 2014 so critical and why would you close Fred Richards in 2015 when the executive course at Braemar is closed? On page 29 of 75 you show lost revenue of $142 and reduced expense of $65 during the construction. Wouldn't that revenue or at least 50% of those rounds be played at Fred Richards if it were open in 2015. At the Park board meeting it was said that the Braemar Operations need the savings from Fred Richards to pay for the driving range expansion. On page 25 of 75 you say closing Fred Richards in FY15 will reduce revenue by 169k and expenses by 228k thus saving the city 59K. I do not see why a decision needs to be made in 2014 to Close Fred Richards as closing Fred Richards will not pay for the Range expansion prior to need for the money. Actually if 50% of those rounds that would have been played at the Braemar executive course(71k) were to be played at Fred Richards then keeping Fred Richards open in 2015 saves the city 12k So I am asking why do we need to make a decision in 2014 and why would you close Fred Richards during the construction? So far the explanation are not adding up. Thank you in advance for your response Wayde Heirigs Vice President, Chief Accountant and Interim Treasurer Alliant Techsystems Inc. 7480 Flying Cloud Road Eden Prairie MN, 55344 Office 952 - 351 -3016 Cell 612 - 695 -7399 Deb Mangen From: Heirigs, Wayde <Wayde.Heirigs @ATK.COM> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 3:58 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Edina Mail ;joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: Re: Breamar operations proposals I would add that I don't think that the Braemar operations will see 730k in savings because 50 percent of the rounds played at Fred Richards will not transfer to Braemar due to the following Most popular tee times are taken It is not flat and user friendly for seniors A par three course is less attractive (we are trading two executive courses for a par three). The park board consultant stated this in'his report. Fred Richards is better and gets more rounds than the current executive course at Braemar. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 14, 2014, at 3:35 PM, "Heirigs, Wayde" <Wayde.Heirigs @ATK.COM> wrote: I have the following questions to the Park Board that I think we should have answered prior to any vote to close Fred Richards Ann two more questions It was said at the Park Board meeting that we need to close Fred Richards in order to prevent the city from having to fund the Breamar operations and closing Fred Richards will save the city $730k. Who will pay for the construction to repurpose the land that Fred Richards is on? Who will pay for the annual maintenance? I assume the answer is the city. If the city, has to pay 500K ( conservative estimate) to repurpose the land and $50K a year to maintain the land (from the Park Board consultant), then the city did not save any money. I think to complete the analysis and we need to understand the answer to these questions before we proceed. Wayde Heirigs Vice President, Chief Accountant and Interim Treasurer Alliant Techsystems Inc. 7480 Flying Cloud Road Eden Prairie MN, 55344 Office 952- 351 -3016 Cell 612 - 695 -7399 Deb Mangen From: Eugene Nord <eljnord @aol.com> Sent Saturday, February 15, 2014 8:42 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Decision on Braemar Enterprise To Mayor James Hovland and Council members, Scott Neal, and Ann Kettreh, Ladies and Gentlemen, On my e-mail of late Thursday evening, on my commentary about the future possible use of Fred Richards, I referred you to go to a website. I quoted Hack.com. I should have quoted Hack Golf.com. I'm sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused you. Gene Nord 6425 Nordci Circle Edina, 55439 Deb Mangen From: Paul Jensen <pjensen3132 @earthlink.net> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 10:27 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett@comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Fred Richardson Golf Course To: James Hovland, Mayor, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Swenson, I am a homeowner and I live beside the Fred Richardson Golf Course. My address is 7445 West Shore Dr. I have lived here and enjoyed the golf course for 47 years. I played golf on that course through the years until I became handicapped four years ago. Even though I am handicapped I still enjoy the view of the golf course! I was at the Town Hall meeting related to the Golf Course last Tuesday evening, but I was outside the meeting room so I could not hear most of what was said. As I understand the problem is economic —too few golfers are playing the course to make it profitable. These following your home suggestions might be considered. Edina has are two short golf courses, Braemar and Fred Richardson Golf Courses. For economic reasons I would suggest the following: 1) Close the Braemar Short Course and make Fred Richardson into an even better course than it is now. The reason for this is that the Fred Richardson golf course is longer and more interesting than the Braemar course. The Fred Richardson course enhances the property value of those who live close to it. The aesthetic value of the Fred Richardson course is outstanding. The Braemar short golf course does not enhance any anyone's property or aesthetic values. 2) Close the small clubhouse that serves the Braemar Golf Course and Braemar Driving Range. This would eliminate personnel and their salaries. The Braemar Driving Range can stay in the same place and be managed from the main clubhouse. Coin - Self -Golf Ball Dispensers would be placed at the driving range so that it would not even be necessary to go into the Braemar clubhouse use the driving range. 3) After the Fred Richardson Golf Course has been enhanced as being the Best Short Course Around, it should be advertised in the Braemar Clubhouse, as well as the Edina Sun Newspaper and other places. The Fred Richardson Golf Course has never been advertised well. It was not even advertised from the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse or from these other sources. 4) The Fred Richardson Clubhouse is in a bad location. Going through the industrial area and entering through what seems to be other building parking lots reduces the interest on the course. The clubhouse should be located where it would be much easier to direct people to it. I would suggest moving or building a new clubhouse on the north side of the golf course. There would be easy access from 70''' St. going south on W. Shore Dr. or Wooddale, then east on Sedum, south on Kellogg for just a very short distance. There's a wide easement on Edina property at this site. This accesses to this large tract of land that I believe is owned and maintained by Edina is inaccessible to anybody right now except the property owners whose yards back up to it. There is room for a new clubhouse and parking on this site... It could be very attractive. Easy signs on 70th and Sedum would identify the way to the new clubhouse. I believe this was not considered because commercial traffic in a residential area was considered undesirable. But the driving to and from a golf course would not create a lot of extra traffic. Wooddale Avenue would be the most accessible and it could be improved and widen some prior to the opening of a new clubhouse. 5,) From a marketing standpoint, I would recommend having a golf -pro at Fred Richardson and have group golf lessons starting with young kids. Getting park board leagues trained and leading competition between leagues and other schools could help increase the morning use at the golf course. I can't speak about this but this nice golf course should be marketed. I ask that you consider some of these suggestions seriously. Thank you for your consideration, Paul Jensen. " �A ntmst� This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. D 2 Deb Mangen From: Mark Mironer <mmironer @hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 20144:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 5146 Eden Avenue Dear Council Members: I don't understand why we'd turn scare public land over to developers, where there can be many uses that benefit the public. A community center would far better serve the citizens of Edina than high- density housing. Please reconsider the direction you've been taking. Sincerely, Mark Mironer 4382 Mackey Ave Edina, MN 55424 1 Deb Manaen From: Aaron Tandoh <solidemotion87 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 4:43_ PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Greetings with high honor. As agents of the land one should never withhold the value of love that is found in God. Letting go of the deeds that satisfies ourselves; This ever so grace that is only in the might of God is true and will offer comfort. 1 Deb Manaen From: Tracy H <tracyholtan @outlook.com> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 5:46 PM To: Edina Mail; scott. neal @edinacitizenengagement.org; Mary Brindle ;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Privacy violations: Access to Edina citizen's Facebook accounts now required by Speak Up, Edina" provider, Granicus Attachments: Speak Up, Edina Requirement to Signin Via Facebook- Screen Shot 2014 702 -15 at 4.22.54 PMjpg; Speak Up Edina hosted by Granicus Privacy Violation.docx " Dear Mr. Neal and Edina City Council Members, Good afternoon! Upon receiving a recent city update via email requesting feedback via Speak Up, Edina!, despite being frustrated last time I tried to use the speakupedina site, I gave it another try. The site states: "Want to provide your feedback for the City of Edina? Simply sign up using your email or connect with Facebook!" However, this time upon signing, the hosting company Granicus now cross references Facebook's email system (shared by an agreement between Facebook and Granicus) REQUIRING the user to sign -in with their personal Facebook accounts. This provides Granicus almost unfettered access to Edina Citizen's computer information, enables tracking Gifs and cookies, allows Granicus access and permission to use and sell private data cleaned from Facebook and website activity and tracking access to third parties. Unlike other sites or apps that encourage the user to sign in via Facebook, there is always the option of using just an email and registration, providing only the necessary information. Some people may not mind, but I do not want companies to have full access to my Facebook information, contacts, photos etc. They collect this information to sell it to other marketers. Speakupedina does not provide an option of not signing in via Facebook if their cross reference system indicates you have a facebook account:. I. have NEVER seen this requirement - much less on a site designed for government citizen feedback. The requirement to sign -in via Facebook shows up as an orange alert at the top of the page, and then fades. However, I was able to get a screenshot of the alert before it faded Below and attached). This tactic also, seems highly questionable and unethical. I think I can speak for most Edina citizens in believing citizen to city feedback tool should not require relinquishing our rights to privacy, all users of our computers privacy, nor the rights of our contacts on Facebook. This certainly is not what government transparency. My recommendation is to immediately renegotiate the contract with Granicus, as everything is negotiable, removing the requirement to sign in via Facebook, in addition to addressing the obvious clear invasion of privacy of Edina Citizens. Or better yet, just eliminate the site. Personally, I like the city email alerts, updates and surveys - fast, easy streamlined, timely. I_ also have the city and school Facebook updates directed right into my text alerts. I'm sure there are better feedback tools available for citizens - not my area of expertise, but I do know Speak Up, Edina? is not working. In the most recent inquiry to citizens, 99 citizens provided input via the (frustrating) site, equating to .0002% of Edina's 50,0000 population. Visitors totalled 1,121 people, not clear if all were Edina citizens and/or unique visits, but assuming they were, again that represents .02% of Edina citizens: Certainly not enough feedback or input to base any decisions upon or gauge community feedback. As a believer of "don't complain unless you have a solution(s) to offer": Perhaps this can be discussed in the next city council meeting. Or perhaps, sending a quick and easy survey out to citizen's via email in a city update requesting suggestions would provide some very valuable suggestions. Thank you for your consideration regarding these concerns. Kind Regards, Tracy Tracy Holta,n Phone /Text: 612 - 558 -4688 2 Speak Up, Edina! - Summary of concerns about.-the not -so- private, Privacy Policy by Granicus the site hosting Speak Up, Edinal - impacting the privacy all Edina citizens who choose or wish to participate in Feedback: http: / /speakupedipa.org /privacy - policy "Want to provide your feedback for the City of Edina? Simply sign up using your email or connect with Facebook! " It is now required by Granicus to sign in via Facebook! The below orange sign appears and fades when trying to sign in with just an email and registration. ri 3 � u y aa EdIlLa.. Granicus Privacy Policy for Speak Up, Edina! Users: Effective Date: January 01, 2010 Last Revised: June 01, 2013 Granicus, d /b /a granicusideas.com ( "g ran icusideas.com", "we" or "our ") respects your privacy and is committed to protecting your personal information. We perform market research and other services on behalf of our customers. Specifically, our platform enables our customers (generally companies and communities, referred to herein as "Account Holders ") to create, share, and act upon ideas to drive innovation and make everything, and every day better. Among other products and services ( "Services "), Account Holders, either working alone or through us, may create surveys for their customers, employees, or other persons of their choice, as well as enable persons to post ideas, vote, comment, complete profile questions, and participate in public discussion or private focus groups. On our Website, we also may provide opportunities for interested persons to share ideas with us, for, example, through a blog. Although there are myriad ways in which interested persons may participate in our Website, for simplicity, we refer to the various surveys, projects, blogs, focus groups, and any other activity on our website as collectively "Surveys and Projects ". In this Privacy Policy ( "Policy "), we describe the information that we collect from any visitor to our website ,http: / /www.granicusideas.com, as well to our websites operated by us, e.g., www .Civicldeas.granicusideas.com (where the Civicldeas name will vary based upon our customer and the domain you are using - collectively these entities are referred to as "Website" in this Privacy Policy) Unless we distinguish otherwise, references to "you" include all visitors to our Website. This Policy is incorporated by reference into our Terms and tonditions of our Website, available at http: / /speakupedina.org /terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this document, will have the same meanings that they are given in our Terms and Conditions section. How granicusideas.com Works Account Holders will engage, g ran icusideas.com for a variety of products and services, including to create Surveys and Projects. Persons /companies /communities interested in using our services must create an account with us. granicusideas.com will send an invitation to you (using contact information that the Account Holder provides to us) to participate in the Surveys and Projects, which may include, for example, responding to a survey, posting a comment, or sharing an idea. Information We Collect We may collect information about you from a variety of sources, including information that we collect from you directly when you create a user profile or participate in any Surveys and Projects. We collect information from a variety of sources, including information we collect from you directly when you create an account, visit our Website, use our services, register to make comments on projects or blogs, or request information from us. Information We Collect Directly From You You are required to create an account with us if you would like to participate in any Surveys and Projects. To create an account, we require you to provide us with your email address and to create a user name and password. You will have the opportunity -but are not required —to respond to create a user profile; the items requested in the user profile will vary based on the Account Holder, but may include your name, contact information, gender and interests. You also may have the option to log onto our Website through Facebook Connect. If you log onto our Website through Facebook Connect, we will request, at a minimum, your email or phone number and your password. Additional information that you have made available through Facebook may be provided to us based on the user permissions that you have set in your Facebook account for third party access. Facebook controls the information collected from you during the log in process; we do not control the information that Facebook collects from you. When you sign in through Facebook Connect, we request your permission to: access your basic information, including, your name, profile picture, gender, list of friends and user ids, email address, date of birth, and any other information you have set to public on your Facebook account; send email directly to you; post to your wall; and access your data at any time even if you are not using Facebook. Please note, if you allow us to have access to this information, then we will have access to this information even if you have chosen not to make that information public. For information about how Facebook may disclose your information, including any information you make public, please consult the Facebook Privacy Policy. We have no control over how Facebook uses.or discloses the personal information you provide to it. We store the information that we receive from Facebook along with other information that we collect from you or receive about you. Information We Collect From Third Parties We may collect information about you from third parties, such' as your name and email address, so that we may contact you and ask you to participate in our Surveys and Projects. Information We Collect When You Visit Our Website When you interact with our Website; we strive to make your experience meaningful and easy. We may use or engage others to use cookies, clear gifs, or other tracking technologies to track user activity and to collect Website data. Specifically, when you visit our Website and use our Services, we may collect the following information: IP addresses, browser type, operating system, date and time of visit, time spent on and /or logged onto the Website, browser referral header or other mechanism by which you came to our Website,, and ,links clicked on in our Website. We may combine this information with your personal information that you provide to us by using the Website. In the following paragraphs, we provide additional information about our use of tracking devices: Cookies When you come to the Website, our web server sends a cookie to your computer. Cookies are alphanumeric identifiers that we transfer to your computer's hard drive through your web browser for record - keeping purposes. There are two types of cookies; session -based and persistent -based cookies. We also may permit certain third party cookies to be placed on our Website. Session Cookies Session cookies exist only during an online session. They disappear from your computer when you close your browser or turn off your computer. We use session cookies to allow our systems to uniquely identify you while you are logged into the Website. This allows us to process your online transactions and requests, and to verify your identity, after you have logged in, as you move through our Website. Persistent Cookies Persistent cookies remain on your computer after you have closed your browser or turned off your computer. We may use persistent cookies to track aggregate and statistical information about user activity, which may be combined with other user information. Third Party Cookies We also may engage third parties, including, without limitation, Google Analytics, to track and analyze non- personally identifiable Website data. We use the data collected by such third parties to help us administer and improve the quality of the Website and Services and to analyze usage. We do not have access to or control over these third party cookies, nor does this Privacy Policy cover such third parties' use of data. Disabling Cookies Most web browsers automatically accept cookies, but if you prefer, you can edit your browser options to block them in-future. The Help portion of the toolbar on most. browsers will tell you how to prevent your computer from accepting new cookies, how to have the browser notify you when you receive a new cookie, or how to disable cookies altogether. Website visitors who disable their web browsers' ability to accept cookies will be able to browse the Website; however, you must enable cookies to use most of our Services. Clear Gifs (Web Beacons/Web Bugs) We or the third parties we engage to track and analyze Website data may employ clear gifs (a.k.a. Web Beacons/Web Bugs) to help us better manage content on the Website. Clear gifs are tiny graphics with a unique identifier, similar in function to cookies, and are used to track the online movements of Web.users. In contrast to cookies, which are stored on your computer's hard drive, clear gifs are embedded invisibly on Web pages. Using Your Information Subject to the limitation on how we use your survey responses discussed in the section entitled "Additional Information about Surveys and Projects," we use the information that we collect from you through your participation in our Services, including our Surveys and Projects for several purposes: To create and manage your account To communicate with you ® To fulfill your requests for information, products, and services from us For market research (either individual information or in the aggregate) ® Where permitted by law, to inform you via email about the latest product developments and other information from us or from our business partners that we believe would be of interest to you C To enforce our terms and conditions and otherwise manage our Services We may combine all of the information that you submit through our Website, including, for example, your profile information along with your responses to our surveys. We also will use your information to provide Services to our Account Holders. This may include compiling and reviewing your responses to our Surveys and Projects. Below we describe what information we share with Account Holders. Sharing your Information We may share information about you as described herein. Account Holders: If you choose to participate in our Surveys and Projects; we will share the information with the Account Holder. This will include your responses to the Surveys and Projects, as well as your contact information and profile information, unless you participated in our Surveys and Projects on an anonymous basis. The Account Holders may use your information, at a minimum, for purposes consistent with this Policy, which may include for market research, for sales and marketing, and for other purposes described herein. The Account Holder, however; also may maintain its own privacy policy; if the Account Holder invited you to participate in its Surveys and Projects, then the information that you submit also may be subject to that privacy policy. The Account Holders may contact you directly if your respond to our Surveys and Projects unless you respond on an .anonymous basis. Partners and Subsidiaries: If you choose to participate in our Surveys and Projects, we may share your contact information and non - personally identifiable information (such as information obtained through cookies) with our partners and subsidiaries. We also may combine such information. Our partners and subsidiaries will use your information consistent with the purposes described in this Policy. Other Visitors to Our Website: Depending upon the particular Site Activity, your responses also may be viewable by any other visitor to that website. For example, if you participate in a blog or project, your responses will be viewable by other visitors to that website. To Perform Services on Our Behalf: We may share your information with our partners and subsidiaries as well as hire vendor companies to provide limited services on our behalf, such as payment processing, sending postal and electronic mail, providing technical support, and to assist us in providing the products and services that you request from us. We only provide those service providers with the information necessary to perform the requested service. Sale /Transfer of Business granicusideas.com reserves the right to disclose your information if it licenses, sells, or otherwise transfers its technology or business, or a portion thereof, to third parties. To Protect Ourselves /For Legal Purposes We also may disclose your Personal Information to protect our rights and property, to prevent against fraud and abuse, and to protect other users of our services. We also may disclose your information as permitted or required by law, for example, in response to court orders, subpoenas, or other requests from government agencies. Additional Information About Surveys and Projects We administer Surveys and Projects on behalf of our Account Holders. We may create the Surveys and Projects on behalf of the Account Holder, or the Account Holder will create the Surveys and Projects itself, and provide to us to administer. Regardless of which entity authors the Surveys and Projects, we will host the Surveys and Projects on our Website and collect the responses that you submit. Your participation in our Site Activity.(e.g., completing surveys, project/blog responses, votes, ideas, comments, etc.) will be shared with the Account Holder. In some circumstances, we also will analyze the data and provide that analysis to the organization, and in other situations, we turn the survey responses in their entirety to the organization. We do not share your individual survey responses with any person or entity other than the organization that engaged us to create the survey. We may, however, provide your contact information and aggregate information to our partners and subsidiaries, but we will not provide your actual survey responses to our partners or subsidiaries. Please note that we also will provide the Account Holder with your profile information, subject to the exception below pertaining to anonymous information. If you have any questions about how your information will be treated, please contact speakup(aDgranicus.com. We are not responsible for any information that you submit through this website. If the Account Holder invited you to participate in our Surveys and Projects, then that Account Holder may have its own privacy policy, which will govern the collection and use of your information. Whether your participation response to a particular Survey or Project is anonymous depends upon the Account Holder. Some Surveys and Projects will permit you to respond anonymously, whereas other Surveys and Projects will require your name. We will notify you on the Surveys and Projects if you are permitted to respond anonymously. We do not sell your responses to Surveys and Projects to third parties. We may, however, transfer your information (e.g., contact/profile information) to a third party in the event of a transfer, corporate reorganization, bankruptcy, or other similar event, but we will not sell your survey responses under any circumstances. We merely act as a custodian for your responses on behalf of the Account Holder. Security We take precautions to ensure the security of your personal information., However, we cannot guarantee that hackers or unauthorized personnel may gain access to your personal information despite our efforts. You should note that in using the granicusideas.com service, your information will travel through third party infrastructures that are not under our control. We cannot protect, nor does this Policy apply to, any information that you transmit to other users. You should never transmit personal or identifying information to other users. Children /Minors You must be at least 18 years of age to use this Website. The services available on this Website are not intended for persons under 18, including, in particular, children under. 13, and we do not knowingly collect information from persons under 18. years of age. User Generated Content Portions of our Website permit users to engage in Surveys and Projects. We are not responsible for the privacy of any information that you choose to submit through a public project, such as a blog, or for the accuracy of any information contained "in those postings. Any information that you,disclose becomes public information. We cannot prevent such information from being used in a manner that may violate this Policy, the law, or your personal privacy. Storage Survey data is stored on servers located in the United States. Access You have the right to access the personal information that we collect about you. If you create an account with us, then you may access and update your account information by logging into your account. Once you enter information into a survey, however, you are unable to change your survey responses except by contacting the survey creator. Changes We may periodically update this policy. We will notify you about significant changes in the way we treat personal information by sending,a notice to the email address specified in your primary Account Holder account or by placing a prominent notice on this Website or blog. Questions Any questions about this Privacy Policy should be addressed to support[at]granicus.com or by mail at: granicusideas.com 600 Harrison St. Suite 120, San Francisco, CA 94107 Deb Mangen From: judgeardis @aol.com Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 8:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Public Land I am strongly in favor of utilizing the Arden property for a community resource and not making it available to a developer. A community center would be a good alternative to another housing unit. Ardis Wexler 7520 Cahill Road = 55439 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: February 18, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. �91N�11.�,, • ,n ORFOVP • 1 P. Agenda: Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 Deb Manaen From: Tim McNamara <tim @mcpub.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:22 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl - @gmail:com — Subject: Braemar Golf Analysis Edina City Council A little "venting in the first two paragraphs, please be patient. For the last year I have heard rumblings with regard to the Fred Richards and Braemar golf facility. Recently,'it seems that you our elected city representatives and the un- elected park and recreation board are doing once again, what seems to be a pattern of waiting until the last minute to announce to Edina residents, who you were elected to represent, preordained plans to spend our tax dollars. Behind the scene, the city spends city money to do studies using unqualified consultants, before they survey it's residents. Residents, who many are consultants, business owner and problem solvers. For the past 15 years, I have played golf at Braemar at least once week with a group that consists of now 72 golfers. Our group is not the Braemar Mens Club. Started many years ago by Pat Manion, we have grown to be the largest single non -city organized contributors of annual rounds played at Braemar. Week after week we show up and play, we don't cancel our tee times because of the weather, we play. We don't come to the course because of the food or the club house, we come for the golf. Over the years we have noticed the lack of demand for play and tee times. Seems the city could have started with asking us when they started their analysis of the facility. But know one has asked. So here is my unsolicited analysis as a business owner. Background for a business approach to a solution: - Unlike government, a business does not have an open checkbook to make mistakes when the climate changes for it's products or services. The problem should be broken down into small segments or divisions. For Braemar these would be 3 divisions; the driving range, the 2 executive courses and the 27 hole. championship course. On the surface it looks like Braemar should be making a lot of money because it has so much capacity. However, the real answer is it has too much capacity and exceeds the current demand for golf and not enough capacity at the driving range. Also, excess capacity comes with excess costs which often times is the reason for operating losses. The solution is not to raise prices on an assumed demand, it is to reduce capacity and improve the capacity that remains. Nor is the solution to eliminate effectively both executive courses and replace them with a single par 3 course. The following is what I would suggest to the City Council, for FREE. Keeping in mind that if I were giving this advice in my business I would have charged for it. - Close the Executive course on the Braemar property. - Increase the footprint of the current driving range from the east of the first hole to just west of John Harris Way. Build a first class driving range, teaching and practice facility on this larger footprint. - Sell the land north of Braemar Blvd to a developer for housing. No residents are going to show up a the council meeting demanding that it remain a golf course, and saying that it was reason they bought their home and now there property will have less value. Because there are no homes directly on the course. - Three years from the beginning of the renovation, sell part of the land that holes 19 -27 currently sit on to a developer. The same applies with respect to resistance from residents as in the sale of the north of Braemar Blvd land. - Re- configure holes. 8, 17 and 18. - Move all the executive course demand over to Fred Richards. If the city turns it into a park the city still has costs and will never have revenue. Also, it would retain an Executive Course facility which is not the same as a Par 3 course as proposed. So it doesn't make sense or should I say cents. - Using the revenues from the land sale, improve 1 -18 (sand traps, fairways and greens with some re- design) and build the practice area over a 2 year transition. - The transition and improvements could occur over a 2 year period using 19 -27 as the second 9 holes with 1 -9 improvements occurring in the first year and 10 -18 occurring in the second year. - Once improvements are completed and because of the location, this would establish Braemar as.the premier 18 hole public golf course within the metro area. Residents and non - residents would be offered patron access, non - patron residents would pay a reduced rate and non- residents would pay a higher rate. Example Chaska Towne Course rate structure. Savings for the city would be in a reduction in capacity, which would yield a reduction in maintenance costs 18 holes only, rather than 27 holes. Plus the revenue from the land sale and additional property tax base from the newly developed land. These revenues would more than offset the costs of the renovation and may even pay off the 13 million dollar bond which pasted without a vote from Edina residents. I was told last week that.a council member, who I will not name, recently said, "The City Council has no appetite for selling city land at this time ". Respectfully, I don't believe that this council member or the council as a whole owns this land. The taxpayers do and it Is becoming very difficult to continue to live in a place where I grew up and see the wasteful spending and government approach decision making on a daily basis. Over the past 21 years I have seen my property taxes increase 4X with no end in site! Sincerely Tim McNamara Tim McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr., Edina, MN 55436 952.922.4220 - fax 952.922.4287 Deb Manaen From: dmswan2124 @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:48 PM To: Edina Mail; joni ben nettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Cary Teague - Subject: 6609 Bltackfoot Pass Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Today many of us are in shock watching all the trees being cut down. We were told there would be a 10 ft environmental easement. Big oak on the corner is being cut down as I write. We were all under the impression that there was to be a 10 ft environmental easement where no trees or shrubs would be removed. I talked to the supervisor of the tree cutting co. I asked how many trees were to be removed, he said "just about all of them ". How does this happen ? ?? can you stop him? At the meeting, Mr Busyn would not answer when asked how many trees would be cut, how many saved. It is clear to many of us now, that he can remove everything and if he gets a fine, so be it. It is worth it to him. He does not live in this neighborhood. The only people happy about this are the buyer and the seller. This is not about keeping the character of our neighborhood intact, it is all about money. We are all greatly saddened that the vote of planning and zoning 6 -2 against this subdivision was not considered. Dean and Mary Swanson Deb Manaen From: Kelly McCoy < Kelly @marathonfoods.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:05 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject•. SAVE THE FRED! Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed To Whom It May Concern, I am writing to express my support for Save the Fred! Even though I grew up in Minneapolis my family has been playing golf there since it opened. I feel it is a complete travesty that you would consider getting rid of this wonderful community asset. It seems all the numbers don't necessarily add up and the council isn't being completely transparent in their argument to re- develop this land. This isn't a decision that a group of 5 people should be allowed to make on the behalf of all Edina residents. Please preserve Fred Richards Golf Course! Thanks, Kelly McCoy Parkwood Knolls /Edina Resident since 1995 The information contained In this message and any attachments are privileged and intended only for the recipient names. If the reader Is not a representative of the Intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the Information it contains Is prohibited. If you receive this message In error, please Immediately notify the sender and delete the original message and attachments. Deb Mangen From: kelly a jungels <kjungels @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:08 PM To: Edina Mail Subject indian hills Mayor, you should drive through our neighbor hood today. You could see ALL the trees that are being cut down because of you and the council members agreement to subdivide the lot in Indian hills. It is a shame. Kelly lungels Deb Mangen From: Cary Teague Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:17 PM To: 'dmswan2124 @aol.com'; Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com;'James Hovland' Cc: Scott Neal; Cindy Larson Subject: RE: 6609 Bltackfoot Pass Dean & Mary, Thank you for notifying staff of the activity at 6609 Blackfoot Pass. I contacted Scott Busyn when we received the complaint. He stated that the preservation easement has been staked in the field, and they should not be removing trees within the easement. He was on his way to the site to monitor. Staff is also on its way to visit the site. The easement does allow undergrowth and buckthorn removal. Tree removal within the easement would require replacement. There isa large 30 inch Oak located near the corner of Blackfoot & Cheyenne on the approved plans, however, it is not located within the preservation easement. I will pass along more information when we receive it. Thanks! Ca ry Cary Teague, Community Development Director t� 952 -826 -04601 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Cell 952 -826 -0236 'td 4801 W. 50th St. I Edina, MN 55424 cteague(rDEdinaMN..qov I www.EdinaMN.gov /Planning "`rte ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: dmswan2124@aol.com [mailto:dmswan2124 @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:48 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2Cdcomcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonanni@g_mail.com; Cary Teague Subject: 6609 Bltackfoot Pass Today many of us are in shock watching all the trees being cut down, We were told there would be a 10 ft environmental easement. Big oak on the corner is being cut down as I write. We were all under the impression that there was to be a 10 ft environmental easement where no trees or shrubs would be removed. I talked to the supervisor of the tree cutting co. I asked how many trees were to be removed, he said "just about all of them ". How does this happen ? ?? can you stop him? At the meeting, Mr Busyn would not answer when asked how many trees would be cut, how many saved. It is clear to many of us now, that he can remove everything and if he gets a fine, so be it. It is worth it to him. He does not live in this neighborhood. 1 i The only people happy about this are the buyer and the seller. This is not about keeping the character of our neighborhood intact, it is all about money. We are all greatly saddened that the vote of planning and zoning 6 -2 against this subdivision was not considered. Dean and Mary Swanson Deb Mangen From: Hugh Thompson <hugh.b.thompson @gmail.com> Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Braemar Enterprise Please forward this email to the Mayor, Scott Neal, and Ann Kattreh. Thank you. I have been a resident of Edina and active golfer at Braemar for 25 years as of February 12th. I have always supported the Enterprise up until these past few years. These past 5 years have been tough for golf and Braemar what with the recession and decline in popularity for the game of golf. The main 18 hole Braemar course Is not what I first played on 25 years ago. It's quality has declined along with the speed of play which has led me to play other public courses such as Baker and Chaska on a regular basis. In particular, these two venues are of excellent quality and can both be played under 41/2 hours..... walking. The rangers make you .... very firmly but politely. A lot us in Edina are convinced that Braemar can re -attain its premier position in the Twin Cities Golf community and in spite of the declining numbers of golfers in America at least break even if not make a profit. How can this be done: by following the recommendations as put forth in the Braemar meeting of January 30 by Scott Neal and associates: Close Fred Richards and convert it to park land, redesign and downsize 19 - 27 to create an Executive 9 hole course ( this would replace the present Executive course and have the new one all on one side of the main entrance road), redesign and rebuild a premier Driving Range as is now presently planned, contract out the restaurant business, and create a new fee structure. The economics of doing these recommendations would be positive by 2019 or 2020 but more importantly establish a Golf Enterprise equal to none in the surrounding area and carry itself through the 2020's if not longer. Thank you, Hugh Thompson 6126 Arctic Way Edina, MN 55436 952 - 210 -4484 Deb Mangen From: Nancy Beegle <nmbeegle1 @ao1.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail;joshsprague @edinarealty.com Subject: Fred Richards Plan Due to a church meeting I will be unable to attend tonight's meeting. Probably better being in a place of prayer..... Please know that I am extremely concerned on the authority placed on so few that will impact so many. Josh - you represent my district. Where were you when this whole fiasco started? You were voted in to represent us. Part of your accountability is to keep us informed of decisions that WILL impact us. This golf course is in our neighborhood. We aren't stupid - the purpose behind these meetings is not to enhance the golf experience - it is to close and redevelop our neighborhood. OUR neighborhood. Where have you been? Many on my block have no clue that these meetings and discussions are taking place. As our representative I hope you will in fact keep us in mind. Where is the "how can we avoid closing this course" discussions and draw in more revenue. Probably because that hasn't been the intent all along. Sent from my iPhone Deb Mangen From: Sprague, Josh <joshsprague @edinarealty.com> Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:05 PM To: 'Nancy Beegle'; Edina Mail Subject RE: Fred Richards Plan Nancy: I don't represent a district, I am an at -large representative of the entire city. Cornelia is where I live, and certainly there are many new things happening there. I have had a council newsletter (Edina411) that I send out to over 600+ people since I was elected. Every time anything comes up that is significant to the city, it goes in that newsletter. Pentagon Park redevelopment, the 9 Mile Creek Trail route, and potential changes to Fred have all been mentioned — although . there was no specific staff plan to comment on until the public information meeting that many neighbors attended. The city also has many sources of information about changes happening (council connection; press releases; meeting video; meeting minutes; public /open work sessions /etc). And I hold Fridays open to meet with residents on topics of interest. I also have phone calls and email exchanges with people all the time. So I think it's a little unfair to say that I haven't kept people informed -- and that there aren't many opportunities for people to educate themselves and stay in the loop. Too bad we don't have an organized association on the south side of Cornelia -- it would make information transmission and discourse even easierl There are no plans to redevelop the neighborhood. There are no plans to sell the Fred land if operations close -- it will always remain parkland. I suggest you attend the park board meeting tonight, where there will be a public hearing and plenty of testimony and debate both for and against the staff recommendation. Regards, js josh sprague, realtor edina realty 6800 france cell /text 612.501.0252 http: / /ooshsprague.com - - -- Original Message---- - From: Nancy Beegle [mailto:nmbeeelel@aol.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:54 PM To:.mail@edinaMN.gov Sprague, Josh Subject: Fred Richards Plan Due to a church meeting I will be unable to attend tonight's meeting. Probably better being in a place of prayer..... Please know that I am extremely concerned on the authority placed on so few that will impact so many. Josh - you represent my district. Where were you when this whole fiasco started? You were voted in to represent us. Part of your accountability is to keep us informed of decisions that WILL impact us. This golf course is in our neighborhood. We aren't stupid - the purpose behind these meetings is not to enhance the golf experience - it is to close and redevelop our neighborhood. OUR neighborhood. Where have you been? Many on my block have no clue that these meetings and discussions are taking place. As our representative I hope you will in fact keep us in mind. Where is the "how can we avoid closing this course" discussions and draw in more revenue. Probably because that hasn't been the intent all along. Sent from my iPhone Deb Mangen From: Jeff Wood <jeffswood @gmail.com> Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:06 PM Cc: joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject Save the Fred Dear City Council Members, 1 urge you to Save the Fred! I have personally golfed there with my family many times, enjoying the easy tee -time access and reasonable greens fees. You shouldn't have to join a country club to golf in edinall Please SAVE THE FRED) - Helen and Jeff Wood (Edina Resident since 1976) Edina, MN Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:26 PM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Braemar Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952- 826 -04301 Fax 952 - 826 -0385 ( AKattreh(DEdInaMN.gov 1 www.EdlnaMN.gov q �r -. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From:3mac6001 fmailtoJmac6001(daol.coml Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 3:06 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Hi Ann, My wife and I are Braemar patrons, and have been for 15 years or so. I just wanted to let you know we support the Braemar golf course and driving range improvements. If this requires the need to turn Fred Richards Course into park land, then so be it. For far too long Braemar has been denied adequate funds due to paying down the FR debt, and now that that is resolved, Braemar should not be denied future funding to help maintain the FR course. I hope you and other town people act on behalf of the support to Braemar. Thanks, Jim and Sheran Mc Nulty 6001 Bonnie Brae Drive 952 9411743 Deb Mangen From: Hunzelman, Nick < Nick .Hunzelman @cnfintemational.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:58 PM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; jonibennet @comcast.net Cc Hunzelman, Nick 'hunzelman @comcast.net' Subject: Decision to Close Fred Richards Edina City Council, I' want to express my disappointment and frustration with the process of closing down the Fred Richards golf course. It seems to me there has been a very quick decision made to close the course without input from the citizens and without a complete review of the financial data that actually shows Fred Richards as a viable city asset. I understand and appreciate the financial concerns you have as an elected official but closing a golf course that can actually have a positive impact on the City's bottom line if marketed and managed properly and turning it into a nonrevenue generating park is just beyond my comprehension. I do not understand why the public golf courses are held to a different financial standard then nonrevenue generating city properties like the Edina Art Center and the city parks. I am aware of an extensive analysis of the Edina golf facilities conducted by NGF Consulting. The findings from this analysis did not identify Fred Richards as a problem. Moody's and Standard and Poor's financial review of Edina does not call out a large concern of the Fred Richards course. The only study that suggests closure of Fred Richards is a 23 page study by a private individual. I'm sure the person that did the report did his best but the NGF report was over 100 pages in length. Fred Richards offers a 9 hole golf experience to golf leagues, seniors, families and young adults. Last summer there was a father daughter event on the course every Sunday. I know there are several golf leagues that enjoy the course because of the unique layout of Fred Richards. These leagues will not move over to the par 3 course at Braemar. They will move down to the executive course in Bloomington. Fred Richards offers you adults a chance to play on great golf course full of challenges to Improve their golf game. The mayor is quoted in the August 7, 2013 Sun Current. " "no decision will be made on the future of Fred Richards Golf Course without extensive public input" I know the mayor is an honorable man and will follow through on his commitment. So far there has been one public meeting announcing the plans and tonight there will be a Park Board meeting. I understand through meeting notes with on council member the decision to close Fred Richards will me made during the March city council meeting. I remain hopeful the mayor will slow this initiative down and involve the Edina residents. Please make a well thought out unbiased decision on this issue. Nick Hunzelman 7461 West Shore Drive Edina Mn 55435 1 Deb Mangen From: Bryan Peterson <bryanpeterson08 @yahoo.corn> Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:03 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Save Fred Richards! Dear Edina City Council Members, I am writing you today in an effort to persuade you to vote against closing Fred Richards Golf Course. I was complete dumbfounded by the news and momentum within the city ranks to close such a wonderful golf course. My children and I have enjoyed going to the course every summer for the past few years now that they are both old enough to learn and play golf. There is no other course in the cities that offers the same low -key environment to teach, play and learn the sport of golf. My kids and I play at our own comfortable pace. The staff at Fred Richards and the course patrons are always welcoming to those who need more time to learn and/or play the game. Quite simply, Fred Richards makes learning the game, especially for children fun! Further, I cannot get the same enjoyment or experience with my children at Braemar. Braemar is a wonderful golf course for those with a higher skill level and abilities to play on a much more challenging executive course. There is no question, the two courses are not the same and appeal to different demographics. That being said, I understand there are questions about the economic viability of having two city courses given industry trends. Furthermore, there seems to be two different positions on the financial health of Fred Richards, which I would argue need to be further vetted. At the very least... and knowing that the financing of purchase of Fred Richard's is now paid off, it would be logical to see how the costs /revenue of the course play's out over 2014 and possible 2015. As opposed to going off of projections using variables that may or may not be accurate. My recommendation is to let the course stay open to truly understand the viability of keeping it open. We owe it to the community! I know I am not alone when I ask for your support to please keep the course open! Sincerely, Bryan Peterson 5656 Woodcrest Drive Edina 55424 Regards, Bryan Deb Mangen From: Jeanne Mooty <d avid. mooty @icloud.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5.42 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Bruce & Tracy Mooty, Chuck & Liz Mooty Subject: Fred Richards golf course Dear Mayor Hovland, I started playing golf at the then Normandale golf course when I was 9 years old. My brothers, Bruce and Chuck, joined me there when they got older. I have been the owner of Prestwick Golf Club in Woodbury, MN for the past 18 years and ran a golf course management company for 15 years. My brothers and I have an interest in discussing the future of Fred Richards golf course with you or whomever you would suggest. Thank you for your consideration. David N. Mooty Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 6:02 PM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Braemar Y �,1 Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952 - 826 -04301 Fax 952 -826 -0385 +. 5� AKattrehOEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.00v Y. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: jakoelmel . (mailto:ja.koelmel@)Q mail. corn] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 5:50 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Hello Ann, When I first began playing golf back in the late '80s, it was a privilege, as a non- resident, to play Braemar. I was resentful of the fact I could not obtain a Patron card. When Braemar began selling non- Resident Patron cards, I bought one, and have continued renewing mine every year. I have always thought Braemar is a unique layout of well planned individual golf holes. I still do. However, the condition of Braemar has deteriorated over the years. I am sure this is due to reductions in its budget, caused by a decline in golf in general, as well as other needs of the City of Edina First and foremost, the Driving Range has become a'goat ranch'. You can virtually forget about having green grass to practice from after the 4th of July. In addition, the range has sunk in, and is no longer able to provide flat lies to practice on. It needs to be enlarged and better managed. I have a few suggestions: I am in favor of doing away with Fred Richards Golf Course. Sell the property and invest in the Braemar complex. That is where the future of Golf is in Edina. Improve the overall practice facility by adding more 'Short game' practice areas. Take the necessary land for this from the Executive course area. Turn everything on the South Side of Valley View Road into practice area. Turn the remaining Executive course property into a 4 or 5 hole 'Short course' where people can hone their skills as well as get in a quick four or five holes. Use the Regulation course holes 19 - 27 as an separate Regulation or Executive 9. ..._...Improve the Fairways,.. tee boxes and green side areas.of. the. Championship . course.. Improve the quality of the - fairways, possibly by experimenting with different grasses. Charge more for golf, if necessary. Serious golfers are more than willing to spend money on a good course which provides a challenging, enjoyable golf experience. Improve the pace of play on the Regulation course. A round of golf can be completed by 4 players walking, in 4 hours. All that is necessary is a staff committed to the task of enforcing pace of play. I live in South Minneapolis. I am willing to make Braemar my Golf Destination in the area if Edina is willing to make it a positive experience for me. Kindest regards, Jeffrey Koelmel 2637 Humboldt Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55408 ja.koelmel@mail.co Deb Mangen From: Robert Norheim <norhrwn @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course City Council, I respectfully ask that you seriously consider not closing Fred Richards. This is a wonderful course and serves the need of many people that Braemar does not, especially the older golfer and the young golfers. Thank you for your consideration. Helen Norheim President, Happy Hackers golf League Deb Manaen From: Dean Mathews <Deanjr @marathonfoods.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:48 PM To: joshsprague @edinarealry.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail Cc: Yeller, Dean Mathews Subject: Save The Fred Attachments: F2F49247 -3F44 -4BE7- 8198- 551326CA6189.png To whom it may concern, I was dismayed to read of the article in the paper this morning about the possible closing of the Fred Richards golf course. I don't personally live. in or near that neighborhood, but consider it to be one of the fine treasures that we as Edina residents are fortunate to enjoy. My family has access to many of the finer golf establishments in the area, but Freddie Richards is where my son likes to play with his buddies. It's an easy and low pressure place for these kids to enjoy themselves and I'm happy that its.there for all the kids....not to mention the many adults that find it an enjoyable and comfortable place to play golf. Braemar does not offer this environment. It's also more than a golf course as one of the great green spaces in Edina. It's too valuable to lose and I don't see how it could operate more effectively as something else. I'm an almost 20 year Edina resident that has lived in 3 different houses and has had the pleasure of street assessments at 2 of these houses with a 3rd on the horizon. I've also voted to support every financial amendment that the city has put forth. From the article this morning, it appears this is a resource that does not make money for the city. However I understand that this may not be the case. in some of the numbers I've seen such as recorded below, I ask are we being truthful in how the numbers are allocated? The paper today it was paid off this year, so why is there a large debt service column — this will presumably go away. Will some of the numbers allocated hit other municipality expense columns if the Fred goes away (Le. FR expenses recorded to Braemar)? I also wonder how the city values the justification of operating the facilities within the city. Does Edinborough make money? Does the Community Center make money? Does the Art Center make money? Does Arden Park, Pamela Park, Normandale Park, Walnut Ridge Park, etc pay dividends to the city? I would answer that they all are valuable assets of the Edina community in which we live. I hope the council thinks of all the people they represent, what this gem means to our city and keeps the Fred Richards golf course as what it is today. Kind regards, Dean, Danielle, Cole & Ramsay Mathews 5604 Brookview Ave Edina, MN (ci d: F2 F49247 -3 F44 -4BE7- 8198- 551326CA6189] CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the original sender at the telephone number above and destroy this e-mail, along with any attachments. Deb Mangen From: Jane Lonnquist <jjlonnquist @earthlinlcnet> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 201411:32 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Note of Praise for HPB -- forward to Mayor and Council Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I write to share my deep appreciation for the Heritage Preservation Board and their thoughtful deliberation tonight. They considered two Certificate of Appropriateness requests for the Country Club Historic District. The first was quickly approved and praised for its modest change to the front facade and its appropriate addition and new garage. The second was debated with integrity and intelligence for more than an hour and then tabled until more information is submitted. While the developer tried to skirt the guidelines and make the case for the "whole house rehabilitation" of 4505 Arden, the board stayed true to the objectives, terms and procedures outlined in the Plan of Treatment you approved in 2008. I was impressed by the intelligence and integrity of the volunteers and staff on this precedent- setting case — the first attempt to tear down a historic home in Country Club since the. stronger guidelines were enacted six years ago. Respectfully, Jane Lonnquist 4510 Drexel Avenue Deb Mangen From: Vicoula4 @aol.com Sent: Wednesday; February 12, 2014 9:51 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonann @gmail.com Subject: Re: Fred Richards Dear City Council - Members: I am 'writing with concerns about the closing of Fred Richards golf course. There seems to be a rush to judgement; and that despite efforts of nearby residents anddgolfers, the proposals continues to move forward to close Fred Richards. It is my belief that one aspect of having a successful outcome to keep both courses open AND profitable would be to use an independent contractor to manage the courses. This is being done if several cities •with positive results. Des - ►Moines was in a simiCar position with their municipaCcourses, and by hiring a company to manage the costs, they were able to have a profit in a matter of 2 -3 years. (thegazette.com/*../Municipa/-goff-courses-struggle-as-goffs.) Sy ,mivatizing the courses, Edina stzllowns thepr�perty, dut it rs run by an indoenant contractor. Minnea�olrs, Ihave hear4has �fone the same thing• in fact, they 6iave a contract tivitli aguarantee to de prtadl or the company bias to contribute. lae other issue that is upsetting residents xs '71O-'7Y Richar�.s tviff6e r�purosed- ?here are costs involvedas tivelCas the maintenance. D e suggestion that it wiffbe a park, woes not seem practica4- as Centenniaflakes is ZOSI- ley' money ('almost com_paradfe to -Tred7Zic6tarcis) yYhy does that seem to de a _possadigtyz ?lie r5vurosing, ifnecessary, shoufd- -VO�6e an afterthought dut 6e ongoing in the drscussza so there rs a �fznite direction. Ma,fing Braemar into an eltego jFcourse and vending huge sums to do it is not a guarantee to attract moregojFers Oie fia that the Fib wiffgo over there instead is a stretch Braemar is z/,3 f the �.eficit; Please take the time to excel re the eptaon ,? �vatizing the municoalgoffcourses Ucki Vithers Ellen J. Kennedy, Ph.D. 7220 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 kennedy @worldwithoutgenocide.org Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 February 10, 2014 Dear Council Members, Thank you for the opportunity to speak with many of you, members of the Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission, and Mayor Hovland last week. It has been a privilege to be involved in some of the past work of the EHRCC that had strong support of the City Council. I would appreciate the opportunity to work more directly on the Commission and it would be an honor to be appointed to serve. I look forward to hearing from the committee in the near future. With best regards, Ellen J. Kennedy, Ph.D. Deb Mangen From: Winnieand5teve Martin <martins6012 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 10:28 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Take another look at Golf Enterprise First, thanks for looking at this issue. It has been long "never looked at." Second, main question as Ann, Scott and our Edina Council/Josh Sprague have clearly stated ....... How do we make our Golf Course Operations sustainable over the long - term ?" These thoughts - Fred could be a gem of a Junior Program that would drive your future golfers at Braemar. Closing Fred will potentially create a wretched backlash 5 -10 years later as there is no upcoming Jr. Program to support the Sr. Braemar plan. Golf is on a national trend down. Edina has the opportunity to change that trend locally by how the community wants to shape their own future golf enterprise. Think of it like school.... for success in middle and high school you need a strong elementary/pre - school foundation. Fred is your elementary-school to your high school /Braemar. Fred won't lose you-money. Braemar is. Utilize Fred to fuel funds for Braemar. Reverse the philosophy - Fred will pay for your Braemar. Fred is the'future of Edina golf. Let's build a BRAEMAR NEST (like the Hornets Nest.) How about a fundraiser? How about a Jr. Partnership with USGA Tee to Green? How about a Junior Tournament to raise funds for improvements? How about a consolidation of our Park and Rec. program. to change the future of golf in Edina. It's a tremendous opportunity that invests in the youth and the future of this Community. Winnie Martin 6012 Ewing Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 Deb Mangen From: Michael Wolff <mikew @mgwolff.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 201411:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf Course Dear City Officials, As a ten year.member of the BMC, a business consultant for over twenty five years, and resident of Edina I believe I have credible input and ask that you give my comments serious consideration. Braemar Golf Course is a jewel for Edina and has the potential to be an outstanding, profitable facility for the city. Despite the fact that golf is currently down, Braemar is well positioned to grow even in poor market conditions. The location is superb as compared to golf courses in the outer ring of the suburbs, it has perhaps the prettiest land of any municipal golf course in the Twin Cities, and the course layout is good. There is only one reason this facility isn't filled to capacity and making a profit and it is because it is failing to compete with other venues despite the fact that it has every advantage. The current operational path is called a death spiral in the business consulting industry. A death spiral occurs when a business is failing to attract enough customers so it tries to cut costs in order to make the product /service less expensive. As a result, the quality suffers and the value decreases. When the value decreases fewer customers want the product /service. So, the result is fewer customers. Given fewer customers the business makes further cuts, which again decreases the value and results in even fewer customers. Hence the term death spiral. Braemar golf course is in this death spiral as I have observed it firsthand. And it has lost its reputation for quality, which most any avid golfer in the community will tell you. When there is no competitive advantage, a death spiral is hopeless and the business should be liquidated, but that IS NOT the case with Braemar Golf Course. It has significant competitive advantages, but the continual cuts-in cost have devalued the product and, frankly, the less than stellar service and moderate facilities can't make up for the low quality of the golf course. Braemar enjoyed the previously favorable market conditions and due to its competitive advantages fared well, and it still can but it must be more competitive. To pull out of the death spiral Braemar needs to invest in the golf course to improve the quality. Significant improvements in value to the golfer can be made with little investment and additional expense, for the most part simply with better maintenance (great improvements in service can be made with no additional expense). Then, because of its advantages, it would attract more golfers and it would allow Braemar to raise its prices, increasing both the number of rounds played and the price paid per round. Edina is a premiere suburb and Braemar Golf Course has the potential to be a premiere amenity and Edina needs to look at Braemar as an opportunity, not a cost center (as does St. Paul with Keller Golf Course and Coon Rapids with Bunker National). Not only would this be good for that sector of the population that can enjoy this amenity, it would add to Edina's status and supports property values, which is good for the entire city. Should you be so inclined I will offer my professional services free of charge to look at the operations of Braemar Golf Course beyond a list of improvements, but to a connection with value and the financial performance of the facility. Respectfully, Michael Wolff 5300 W 70' Street President M.G. Wolff & Associates, Inc. Office: 952 - 942 -9653 Fax: 952-942-9656 Web Address: www.mgwolff.com Deb Mangen From: Ed Gray <egray @sprintmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 20141:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Golf Please forward this to the Mayor, Members of City Council, Scott Neal and Ann Kattreh. I have lived and owned a house in Edina for almost 40 years and have been active at Braemar Golf Course and the Braemar Men's League for over 15 years. I fully support the 6 point plan as advanced by the City Manager and Parks Director. Braemar should be restored to it's position as one of the premier golf facilities in the state. This will only happen if the plan is approved. The driving range is urgently in need of renovation and increased use of the range will generate revenue to be used for the entire golf enterprise. I also support the closing of the Fred Richards Course and consolidating that operation at Braemar. The Fred Richards course is redundant and should be converted to parkland. Repurpose and redesign the new 9 and make it a Par 3 course. Most Edina golfers would prefer not to play that 9 anyway due to it's design. The 6 point plan is right on in terms of improving the food operation and making urgently needed improvements to the original '18 Braemar holes. I believe that if the original course is restored to it's potential, rounds will increase and price increases can be made. As the course now stands, pace of play and conditions will not sustain a price increase. There are just -too many alternative golf courses to play for the'' same price that are in better condition and have a better pace of play. Thanks you for your consideration Edward Gray 6125 Arctic Way Edina, MN 55436 Deb Mangen From: JOHN BERG Owner <jebergfamily @q.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 2:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Mayor Hovland, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, Ann Swenson: I attended the Park Board meeting last night and was surprised and disappointed. to see that the Park Board approves the recommendation to close Fred Richards and forwarded the matter to the city council. This decision was made in spite of numerous public and private statements from members of the city council that there would be adequate time for public participation and feedback before any decision would be made in connection with the Fred. The city giving public notice in late January about the issue and then having a potential final decision March 4 is highly inappropriate. It is unconscionable to move forward without additional analysis. Closing Fred Richards will fundamentally change the fabric of our community and it is our right to play a role in this planning process. Numerous residents have requested to volunteer their time and expertise to the City, to brainstorm 'ideas including but not limited to increasing traffic and profitability for Fred.` The financial projections assuming that 50% of Fred Richards revenue /golfers will directly add to Braemar's bottom line are flawed at best. Although there is no way to predict where these golfers will go if Fred closes, from all information I have seen and heard the leagues that currently use Fred will not use Braemar in the future. Additional there has been absolutely no effort to drive revenues at the Fred and many alternatives exist that could substantially improve the cash flow on the course. Additional analysis is required for a decision of this magnitude. How can any thoughtful decision be made that is intended to reduce costs to the city be approved without looking at alternative uses and the cost to convert and maintain such alternative use? Additionally, it is not appropriate to make a decision to close Fred without a simultaneous decision about what future use it would have. I appreciate a response. Thank you, John Berg Deb Mangen From: Danlnan @aol.com Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:05 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: braemar golf mayor Hovland and City Council members:strongly support staff position to close Fred and invest in braemar. Dan Peterson 6408 Gleason Ct 55436 952 828 9684 Deb Mangen From: Eugene Nord <eljnord @aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Rick Ites Presentation Attachments: Rick's message to Park Board.docx, ATT00001.htm Ladies and Gentlemen„ I was reading Rick Ites, President of Braemar Men's club and President of the Braemar Golf Association, comments for you last night and ran out of time. Attached is his entire message for your review. Good evening. My name is Rick Ites. Thank you for giving me these minutes to summarize my observation of Golf Operations here in Edina. My personal background includes: -- being a resident of Edina since 1978. -- President of Braemar Men's Club for the 1999,2009,2013 and 2014 seasons. - -the Braemar Men's Club is the largest in MN with over 300 members. -- President of the Braemar Golf Association, 2011 to the present. This is a 9 member board which oversees all the golf leagues that use the Braemar golf facilities. The Fred Richard leagues have one member. My theme is the restoration of golf in Edina to the premier experience we had for so many years. At one time there was a 3 -5 year wait to join the men's club. The parking lots were full most days. Tee -times filled fast. The practice facility was well maintained and the overall course conditions were excellent. Now, there is no wait -list for the men's club as many members have left to play courses that are in better shape. Our aging irrigation system needs replacing; drainage issues need to be addressed; bunkers and tee areas need to be rebuilt; cart paths need to be built to allow for play in inclement weather; the driving range needs expansion to keep up with the technology of new golf equipment; the grill area needs updating; the clubhouse roof needs to be redesigned; the deck needs resurfacing and the locker rooms need repair. As you can see, the list is long and I am sure not all inclusive. To address these issues and any others, prudent and careful expenditure of community resources-. bea required. We, the city of Edina, need to have this community asset restored. The above wish. list cannot be accomplished at one time. I feel the practice facility /driving range area is the most important item to be addressed. By making the commitment to accomplish this in 2014, the facility will generate more net. operating cash that then can be used for other, items: on the list. This requires building a master strategy to restore our golf, facility back to the time when Braemar was considered one of the best public courses in the country. Top quality public courses like-Chaska, Bunker Hills, Baker, Edinborough and Keller are making significant financial commitments to upgrade or improve their facilities. In conclusion, my hope is that the Braemar golf course is once again used for the benchmark that other communities use for their golf. Thank you for your time. Deb Manaen City Council Members, I am encouraged to hear the Edina City Council is moving forward with plans to improve Braemar golf course and practice facility. I have been an Edina resident and supporter of the Edina Parks for. many years. The quality of the Park system has always been asset for the City and a great source of pride for the residents. Thank you for recognizing the importance of maintaining the high quality of Edina's park assets. Bill Hollway BMC Board Member Bill Hollway cell # 612 - 483 -3006 l From: Bill Hollway <bhollway61 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:44 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf City Council Members, I am encouraged to hear the Edina City Council is moving forward with plans to improve Braemar golf course and practice facility. I have been an Edina resident and supporter of the Edina Parks for. many years. The quality of the Park system has always been asset for the City and a great source of pride for the residents. Thank you for recognizing the importance of maintaining the high quality of Edina's park assets. Bill Hollway BMC Board Member Bill Hollway cell # 612 - 483 -3006 Deb Mangen From: Jmac6001 <jrnac6001 @aol.com> Sent Wednesday, February 12, 2014 4:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Dear City Representive, My wife and I are longtime patrons of Braemar, and greatly enjoy playing golf so close to home. We are very supportive of the plans to upgrade the course and the driving range to a much higher standard than currently exists. Its too bad that we can't support Braemar and Fred Richards, but if a choice has to be made, we are strongly in favor of allocating funds to Braemar and not FR. Please represent our support for Braemar at the council meetings. Thank you, Jim and Sheran McNulty 6001 Bonnie Brae Drive 952 9411743 Deb Mangen From: Barry Lundgren <barry.lundgren @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 5:53 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: DO NOT close Fred Richards! Dear City Officials, Edina has an aging population, one of the oldest in the metro area, that is increasing due to all of the new high - density housing units being built in Edina. Older people enjoy playing golf, but it can not or do not want to play a long and difficult course like the Braemar 18. The Braemar Executive is not challenging enough. Fred Richards is perfect. You need to find other things to CUT in order to keep Fred Richards open. (Bike lane mania would be a good place to start cutting.) Maybe use some of that new -found slush fund money from our new utility bill surcharges? As a side note, business at Fred Richards might improve if people knew about it. It is Edina's best kept secret. Before the City bought the course, it's entrance and parking lot were highly visible on W 77th St. near Hwy 100. Edina moved the entrance to a location hidden by thick trees, behind the empty Pentagon Park offices. The small sign on Parklawn is almost an afterthought. A private, for -profit business would never have hidden the entrance like this, but I guess the City doesn't have to think about things like that when you're spending other people's money? How about some advertising this summer? How about some new signs, including ones on France and 100? How about trying Groupons? How about listing Fred Richards on the city parks section of the web site? (It's not even mentioned now.) Sincerely, Barry Lundgren, age 61 Edina resident since 1957 @ age 4 Deb Manaen From: Leynia <Leynia @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: freight rail Dear James, If the railroading of SLP passes, homeowners will never get our investments back out of our homes. The decrease in home values will reduce the property taxes, further spiraling down the value of our good city. Regards, Ellen Lipschultz 3925 Dakota Ave S 55416 Deb Mangen From: Kathy <oconnellgang @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 9:24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred richards closing To the Edina City Council members, For full disclosure, I will introduce myself relative to the Golf course evaluation and apparent decisions being made. I am a resident that lives very close to the Fred Richards golf course. I am not a golfer, nor are any of my family members. I have heard from the "save the Fred" group. I attended the Pentagon park open house. I was not in attendance at the public meeting nor the park board meeting. I have listened to some of the park board meeting online. I have a genuine interest in what is best for the community and Edina. I feel I am an independent third party, without a bias. You can decide based on the above. My concerns are as follows: - The process - why is it being rushed through? I have seen many areas of the city work on issues, and there always Is a well thought out process to gather all inputs and make good decisions. The topic seems to be lacking significantly in its process. - Golf - I hear some of the facts given at the park board meeting. Too many golf holes compared to the rest of the country. A need for significant capital contributions at Fred Richards and Braemar. A positive financial position for Fred Richards before cost allocating from Braemar, break even after cost allocations. Debt load that is going away, with its interest. All these discrete facts, but they don't tie together, and the full picture isn't made clear. On the surface it sounds like Fred Richards is in better financial shape than Braemar. Is seems that the board has decided that the city doesn't want to have all the golf holes it has, but I don't know where that comes from, the study? - Pentagon park - At their meeting, they made it clear that they are moving forward with or without the Edina parks. But they had drafts of plans on display with recommendations for the golf course space. It gives the appearance that Pentagon is driving the city on this topic. Full financial picture - There are statements about closing Fred Richards based on too many golf holes in town, based on bond rating agencies, and based on financial burden. But, the alternative has not been laid out. As a finance person, 1 don't understand how they could recommend shutting down Fred Richards, without knowing the full plan. They know with some certainty what revenue will disappear. They know what expenses go away. But they don't talk about what ongoing expenses will be. The property still remains, and need to be maintained, at some cost with no revenue. . Therefore they know with certainty that the property will be generating losses. - Underutilized asset - The statement was made that Fred Richards is the most underutilized asset in the park system. When shutting it down without an alternative plan will guarantee that it will become even more underutilized down to zero utilization. Overall, I don't know what the right answer is. But I can't imagine that anyone of you could know it either. Please vote with a clear mind to delay this decision until you have been presented with a full picture of how this all ties together, with a sound process driving the right conclusion, and we as a community can have confidence that the plans for future use of this public space adds to our city. This is the duty of a city council and mayor to do what is best for the city as a whole, and blindly approving closing Fred Richards would be neglect of duty. Also, is the financial information and study that was discussed available for public review? I would be interested to see the report. If you would like to discuss further, I would be happy to have that conversation and expand on the above thoughts. Sincerely, Tom O'Connell 952 - 649 -7125 (cell) Deb Mangen From: Mike Scholz <mscholz @nova - communications.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 201410:31 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Mayor Hovland, I am hoping that you will reconsider the opinion of the Park Board to close Fred Richards. Once this decision has been made there is "NO" turning it back. I have attended both meetings and there has been no alternatives presented. The numbers thrown around do not make sense (to me anyways). I have heard that Fred Richards is profitable one minute and a resource drain the next. I am for improving Braemar if they believe they can attract more dollars ( practice range/ marketing/ redesign). They can be mutually exclusive. 1) At the very least delay this closure so we ca get a clearer picture of costs /potential alternatives 2) lam not saying I believe all the numbers but forsake of argument let's take it at face value. I still would like to the Municipal Liquor Stores to fill in the gaps. I do not know of a better use for those dollars. Edina's golf operation makes it one of only 13 municipal golf courses in the United States with 45 or more golf holes, a statistic that Park Board Chair Keeya Steel called "pretty crazy. to e prod onot tlPersonal m enounced Thank you for your consideration Mike Scholz 4512 Gilford Drive Deb Mangen From: Aaron C Swann <aaron.c.swann @seagate.com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:29 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: Re: Fred Richards Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson Some additional information I found on our neighborhood site. Assuming this information is correct, it continues to baffle me as to why Fred is the course that is on the block. I tend to think that the exec course at Breamar is also cash flow positive, so I would assume that simple pushing Fred golfers to the exec course at Breamar is going to help anything. The problem is revenue from the full courses which take longer to play and are in need of sprucing up. Again, taking away Fred only reduced golf operation revenue and profit. Regards, Aaron Swann from "The Heights" on Nextdoor "Thank you Molly for posting. Here are some important facts for the residents of Edina to know about the proposal to close Fred Richrds Golf course (WHICH IS GOing TO VOTE ON MARCH 4th AT THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING) Additional information you should know: Fred Richards has been and continues to be cash flow positive — every year back to 2007. Contributing over $361 K in net profit to the City of Edina golf operations from 2007 -2013. In 2013, Fred Richards had operating profit of $28k, while the Braemar golf facility lost ($450k +). The Braemar Golf Facility had substantial expenses in 2013 related to the collapse of the golf dome and reconstruction costs that were not covered by insurance. • Fred Richards has $0.00 debt and the property which was acquired in 1994 for $800k is fully paid off. It is essentially a revenue /net operating profit engine for Edina golf operations that can continue to offset operating deficits elsewhere in the system. there is not need to close Fred Richards it is a valuable asset to young learners of the game to grow golf and it also provides the right playing environment for seniors, extendign the game of golf to are rising senior population. Please contact city council members to ask them to dealy this decision until they have had an opportunity to realy examine alternatiave ways to keep both golf experiences in Edina. There is room for both. We have 35 parks in edina and only one executive 9 golf course. Why do we need another Park, such as Centennial Lakes? " On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Aaron C Swann <aaron.c.swann@seagate.com> wrote: Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson This note is to communicate my families very strong support of the Fred Richards golf course and the need for it to remain open. The course offers a casual golfing environment that is rare and that would be impossible to replicate at Breamar. I believe that the proposals so far offered by the city are incomplete and have jumped straight to the answer of closure without considering the full costs or other opportunities to improve the financial status of the golf operations. To me this simply shows a lack of vision or imagination with regard to this issue. In addition, I am very concerned that the quick path to closure is wrapped up with the desire of the Hillcrest Development company to include new parks in their Pentagon Park redevelopment effort. This seems like something that needs to be further investigated to understand the influence that. is being applied here. While I am unable to attend the, next parks meeting due to travel, I will continue to strongly support the efforts of those working to save Fred Richards. Regards, Aaron Swann 6710 Cahill Rd Edina, MN 55439 952- 944 -5261 Deb Mangen From: Eugene Nord <eljnord @aol.com> Sent Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:51 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Decision On Braemar Enterprise To Mayor James Hovland and Council members, Scott Neal, and Ann Kettreh I have been a resident of Edina since 1972 and a member of the Braemar Men's Club since 1980. I'm also a Past President of the BMC and am currently BMC Vice - President for 2014. I would like to thank Scott Neal and Ann Kattreh for the.excellent job they have done in their preparation to present the case for the rebuilding of the driving range in the fall of 2014 and the .future improvements to the Braemar Golf Enterprise to the Park Board. The Board's positive 7 -0 vote is exciting news, and the response to Scott and Ann's efforts should result in increased play and increased revenue at Braemar. Regarding the Fred Richards course, I ask all of you to stay tuned to the developing concept of Hack Golf. Right now, Hack Golf is a conceptual idea being generated by TaylorMade which is giving $5,00,000 this year to "Fund experimentation for Hack golf." A presentation was made at the Golf Convention in Orlando the third week of January regarding this concept by: Mark King: CEO TaylorMade Golf Ted Bishop: President of the PGA Joe Beditz: National Golf Foundation Carl Hansel: World Renown Author, Speaker, and Business thought Leader I urge you to go to Hack Com. and locate this 5 minute presentation. Hack Golf is an idea that is being worked on to make golf more enjoyable for the youngsters, beginners, families, and retirees that would be new to the game. Obviously, TaylorMade and other golf equipment suppliers want to sell more of their product by expanding golf's reach to others than current golf devotees. Hack golf will incorporate ideas, for example, like larger golf holes. When this concept is fully developed and ready for the public, Fred Richards would be an ideal setting to adapt to this new game. By doing so, Fred Richards would be on the cutting edge nationally, and, being in that position would appeal to all future and existing golfers throughout the 3.2 million population of the metro area. It could then be self - sustaining, revenue positive, and yet not compete with Braemar. I will try to pass along future articles that would be of interest concerning this new and exciting concept for making golf easy and enjoyable to play. Gene Nord 6425 Nordic Circle Edina, Mn 55439 Deb Mangen From: Dan Berend <djberend@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:31 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ron Way Subject: Braemar Edina City Council I am an Edina resident and have been a member of the Braemar Men's Club for the past few years. I feel that Braemar has real potential as a revenue producer whereas the Fred Richards facility is more limited due to its size and general layout. It seems that the golf activity now taking place at Fred Richards can be incorporated into the Braemar facility with some planning. For me the best option is for the City to focus on Braemer and close.the Fred Richards facility. I am sure that by now you have heard all the suggestions for improvements at Braemar. Changes to the restaurant operations and a new look for the driving range would be a good start and would be the quickest way to start seeing some profits. Our member /guest tournament brings in many outside golfers and gives us a chance to showcase the course each year so the better it looks and plays the more positive experience it is for everyone. With enhanced and improved restaurant facilities Braemar could attract more non -golf social activities over the winter instead of being closed. From a marketing perspective the Braemer Course is well known to Minnesota golfers and is a positive reflection on the City of Edina. Our goal should be to keep it that way. Dan Berend 03 0 lq;,' i4a 15 � m aZ Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:02 PM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: braemar Another �:µ` f� , Ann Kattreh; Parks &Recreation Director 952 - 826 -04301 Fax 952 - 826 -0385 10 AKattrehoEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov t�,d :., ::= ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Basiness From: Bob Hursh [mailto:bobhursh @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:49 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: braemar' some golf thoughts... i've lived in edina for 28 years ... played fred richards 3 or 4 times...have no problem with its closure. i played more than 30 rounds at braemar last year. I'm really looking forward to driving range improvements. I'm a little concerned that fee increases will be used to cover a large amount of the projected 2015 - 2020 shortfall. the 2013 senior patron rate at braemar was $29.00 and $15.00 additional for a cart. better deals were out there last year for seniors [for example, $29 at stonebrook on weekdays - cart included, $25 at tartan park on weekdays + $16 more for a cart, $40 at edinburgh usa with cart on mondays]. 1 Deb Mangen - From: Ann Kattreh Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 2:01 PM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject FW: BRAEMAR GOLF another *�� rat Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director M e d 952- 826 -04301 Fax 952 - 626 -03B5 ^, AKattrehCZDEdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: SJGLBG @aol.com rmailto:SJGLBG @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:50 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: BRAEMAR GOLF We have noted all of the discussion about Braemar Golf course and the possibility of closing Fred Richards due to losing money the last year or two. Don't feel that 2013 is the best example as the weather played a large factor in the availability of both courses'due to weather conditions, something that affected most every course in the greater Twin Cities area. Fred Richards is best suited to Seniors and the youngsters learning to play the game and it seems ashamed to co: nsider closing such an ideal facility. We would hope that the council will reconsider and keep this wonder facility open for years to come. Scott & LaVonne Garoutte 6105 Abbott Ave. So Edina 55410 952.920 -0853 Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February,11, 2014 1:10 PM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Braemar Thoughts Another •s Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952- 826 -0430 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0385 AKattreh(Q_EdinaMN..qov 1 www.EdlnaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jerry Knoblauch [ mailto:jknoblauch999@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 12:10 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Thoughts I have been an Edina resident for 25 years and enjoy Braemar. Some quick thoughts and ideas. • I know something has to change. • Fred Richards is not important to me, but consider leasing it out to _a professional golf management company or a well qualified local group or association. This would provide revenue. If Fred has any chance of turning around, it would take higher rates, a patron card system, and a charity similar to the Braemar Memorial Fund to fund minor improvements. I have seen the zeal of the Save the Fred group, and it is possible they will rise to the occasion and turn it around. I would vote no, do something else for Edina youth. • Holes 19 -27, the 3rd nine. Retain this nine. Reasons a) you can market that it give a 50% more chance for a last minute tee time or walk -in opportunity b) the leagues should be asked to rotate use of that nine c) move the Monday AM senior leagues to the executive course - pace of play issues d) you can raise costs for an 18 that includes 1 -9 (the premium holes) e) the incremental cost of maintaining that 9 cannot be that great f) this nine should be required on scrambles, this would allow others to play a nine that is not so challenging. • I feel the executive course should have one (albeit short) par 4 to retain exec course status. • Speedy play will attract golfers. a) business card sized handouts by starter with 4 -5 tips on speedy play. This would include cooperation with ranger who has the right to warn a group and advance a group to the next tee box with adj scores of par plus handicap on the hold not finished. • Marketing needs to the group low in demographics, such as the 25 -40 age group. It needs to market the "New Braemer" and provide reasons that warrant the "new" title. • Prime time golf needs higher rates. • Rewards program rewards the regulars, who would play without the reward. Change incentives to encourage non - regulars, I leave it to others to determine what works. • Course Customer Service. It is great, and always has been very professional. There was talk that other Edina programs did not have good customer service, but Braemer is exceptional. • CROSS COUNTRY SKIING - have you ever considered setting this up for the winter? I know snow is iffy these days. Perhaps this can be outsourced, or run with existing personnel. It offers a great layout. • RESTAUANT - not likely to be like a country club restaurant, but does need to try. When the special is the "Scotty Special" which is,.a burger, fries and a beverage, something has to change. Allow cell phone orders from holes 9, 18, and 27 with a dedicated phone number and a brief menu posted at the hole. I probably have more ideas, but this is what I could come up with on short notice. Jerry Knoblauch JKnoblauch999QGMail.com 2 Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh - Sent Tuesday, February 11, 201410:44 AM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject FW: Keep Fred Richardson OpenH Another.... ''- Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director ab95 2 -826 -0430 i Fax 952 - 826 -0385 AKarireh0EdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN,gov � v ' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Virginia Sweeny [mailto :virginia.sweeny @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:22 AM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Keep Fred Richardson OpenH It's a unique venue for non - threatening golf that is simply not available elsewhere. There are courses like Braemar everywhere, but the Fred is a gem where kids and adults can play who wouldn't play at all except for this venue. Since Edina residents are providing the funds, it's much more important to preserve this unique learning opportunity than to support another ordinary course. For increased revenue, raise the non - resident rates at Braemar. Most sincerely, Fred Sweeny & Virginia Sweeny 7129 Gleason Road Edina 55439 1 Deb Manaen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:28 AM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Braemar Please include.... Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director 952 - 826 -0430 1 Fax 952- 826 -0385 AKattreh@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: KAREN STRAND [mailto:strandbrown @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 201410:07 AM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar I agree with the City Plan. Dave Brown Sent from my Wad 1 Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 201410:21 AM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Fred Richards Please include in Park Board and Council packets Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director £ " ? 952 -826 -0430 i Fax 952- 826 -0385 AKattreht@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov " ! ...For Living, g, Learning, Raising Families 6z. Doing Business From: ricksandynelson q.com [mailto:ricksandynelson @q.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:28 AM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: Fred Richards This golf course provides a much needed service to the young and old citizens of Edina. I don't care if it breaks even or even loses money. Please think of the people of Edina and I firmly believe you can improve Braemar and keep Fred Richards open. Richard Nelson 5204 Danens Drive Deb Mangen From: Ann Kattreh Sent Tuesday, February 11, 2014 10:20 AM To: Janet Canton; Frank Petrovic Subject: FW: Braemar Please include in Council and Park Board packets. �tia�-•�.: ?,,. Ann Kattreh, Parks &Recreation Director 952- 826 -04301 Fax 952 - 826 -0385 m AKattrehCZDEdInaMN.gov I www. Edina MN.aov For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business From: Dan Brunsvold rmailto:dpb5401 @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:33 AM To: Ann Kattreh Cc: eIjnord @aol.com; bobteese @msn.com Subject: Braemar U m As a member of the Braemar Men's Club and Edina resident I strongly support the improvements to the golf course and practice area. While I am discouraged that this would require closing Fred Richards, and terminating employees; the course and practice area need serious attention. I would hope that the city would find employment for the three employees! We (20+ golfers) play courses within 25 miles of Braemar .... the vast majority are in bettor shape and less green fees. As residents of Edina ... we find this perplexing, at the minimum. The practice area would be rated even lower! As a final note; I would hope that the city administration is dealing with the closing of Fred Richards with all the facts "on the table ". Respectfully; Dan Brunsvold 5401 Chantrey Rd. Deb Manaen From: DENA <dtortorelis @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:23 AM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Save Fred Richards Dear Council Members, As a resident of Edina for 11 years I am asking that you not close. Fred Richard golf course. My children; now ages 12, 15, 17, enjoy the course as do myself and my husband on occasion. Our backyard butts up the the course and it is so beautiful'and relaxing to look at and enjoy. We need more open spaces and green areas to keep the air clean and make Edina more than just a bunch of houses and shops. It may not be a money maker but it brings so much to life in Edina! I think there is much that could be done to even make it more profitable to even just break even. Does everything have to be a money maker? Are all the parks money makers? Please allow Fred Richards golf course to stay as it is!! Dena Tortorelis 7441 West Shore Drive Deb Manoen From: Sandra Carlson <sandrew12 @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 20149:05 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Idea Dear Edina City Council, I have been following the idea of closing the Fred Richards Golf Course. I think it is a good idea if the land is used properly. What we really need in the greater Southdale Area are affordable town houses that have one -level living. Coventry has been a very successful development. However, there are just a few townhouses in that development that offer one -level living. Many of us would love to sell our homes and stay in the area. There just aren't any good one -level living options available. This would be a win -win for the area. It wouldn't add a lot of additional traffic on France Avenue and would provide a great option for those of us who would like to sell our homes and stay in the area. Right now, Eden Prairie is our best option for these types of townhouses. Please consider this idea as you move forward on looking at closing Fred Richards. I believe it could receive a very strong reception from Edina residents. Very Respectfully, Sandy Carlson 4433 Ellsworth Drive Edina, MN 55435 (952) 926 -0545 1 Deb Mangen From: Pat Manion <pmanion @originalmktg.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 8:06 AM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealry.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Braemar Golf operation Good Morning, As a matter of public record I have taken a "few dollars" off of Mayor Hovland on Braemar Golf Course. Of course, I suppose a lot of residents could say that. For the record, I no longer play golf at Fred Richards or Braemar. My 3 son's sometimes do. I did attend the Golf Course operation meeting that was presented by Scott Neal. Observations // solutions are as follows: • Agreed that golf course rounds are down and so are revenues. Has anyone { staff, who are these people. They were referred to at least 20 times during the meeting } looked at the horrible weather and the fact the golf dome has been down for two years? • Have you all read this weekend's Star Tribune article on Keller Golf Course ? You could certainly substitute Braemar Golf in the article. Yes, the club house and course and range are VERY tired. The current band aid solution is NOT the correct solution. • The majority of you { not Joni Bennett } just passed a 13 Million dollar bond to pay for outdoor hockey, soccer dome etc. I am.ALL for that even though our 3 son's are almost out of Edina. • Why don't all of you put up another 13M bond { put it to vote and I believe it will pass } to upgrade the entire City of Edina Golf Operations. We were told the 13M bond was only cost $60 per household. Another $60 per household would pass with flying colors. • With 500 acres to work with and 13M to proceed the City could build a brand new clubhouse ,driving range and redesign the golf course to bring it all up to the 2014 standards and beyond. • All of the leagues and youth would move over to Fred and the architect could use all of acreage at Braemar to build a world class golf experience. It could be the best public venue in the state if you do it right. • There is no need to close Fred { yes, it does make money } unless of course the City has already cut a deal.with Hillcrest Development. • Edina CC just completed a 3.5 M course renovation. Because of this there is currently a waiting list to join and the rounds are up . Braemar would be the same scenario. Do not close Fred. Move all leagues young and old over there. Tune up a "tired" Braemar Golf Course, driving range and clubhouse. Take it to the citizens of Edina to vote!!! Patrick Manion 6121 Crescent Dr. Edina ,MN.55436 Cell: 612 - 750 -4017 Phone: 952 - 941 -2530 Fax: 952 - 941 -6566 Deb Manaen From: Paul and Cathy Kibbe <pc -kibbe @comcast.net> Sent Monday, February 10, 2014 9:44 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast);joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Ann Kattreh Subject Edina Golf Courses City Leadership, I am writing to express my concern that recommendations by the City Manager and the Park Board regarding changes to the "Golf Enterprise" will negatively impact the City of Edina. As a resident of Edina I support correcting any mismanagement that has occurred in the "Golf Enterprise ". I do not support the lack of problem solving evidenced by poorly conceived solutions and incomplete "plans. These were evident in the recommendations presented at Braemar Club House on the night of January 30th. In one example the presenters were asked what the cost to "repurpose" Fred Richards would be upon its closure. No costs were considered nor included. I would.- not be pleased to see that'level of thought in my son's homework. It was shocking to see it in a recommendation for a major decision such as this. I feel strongly that Fred Richards Golf Course has much to offer and view a recommendation to close it as a "punt ". The two least intelligent solutions that could have been proposed are "Do nothing" and "Close it ". Why was "Close Fred Richards" the first recommendation made in the presentation? It did not have the greatest impact on profit and loss. Nor was it first alphabetically. As a proud holder of both a Patron Card and a punch pass. (used entirely at Fred Richards) this summer you might label me "Biased ". I have brought friends and family from other communities to play at Braemar and at The Fred. I am the father of a 15 year -old who plays in the Junior Golf League at Braemar on Fridays and at the Fred throughout the week. My 11 year -old is just getting into the game and plays Fred Richards. Rather than "Biased" think of me as your target "Resident Customer". Just what is the problem statement? The City cannot accept this as a solution to eliminate $115,000 per year operating loss. As our leadership you must reject this proposal and insist that "Golf Enterprise" leadership provide a solution without the collateral damage to home values (i.e.. tax base), a degradation to the quality of life for residents (11,500 residents under 18 plus many seniors) and the loss of an amenity for residents and businesses in southeast Edina. Paul Kibbe Sincerely, 4900 Poppy Lane Edina Deb Mangen From: Helen Wood <hjwood_md @yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:29 PM To: joshsprague @edinarealty.com, swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: Save the Fred! i Dear City Council Members, I urge you to Save the Fred! 1 have personally golfed there with my family many times, enjoying the easy tee -time access and reasonable greens fees. You shouldn't have to join a country club to golf in edinal! Please SAVE THE FRED! - Helen and Jeff Wood (Edina Resident since 1976) Edina, MN Deb Mangen From: Gary Thacher <gthacher @identitymn.com> Sent Monday, February 10, 2014 7:25 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf Enterprises To: Edina City Council I have played my golf at Braemar since 1986. 1 have been a patron card holder and men's club member, 24 man team member and 8 man senior team member since that time. In the past 1, have played 40 -50 rounds of golf each summer. The majority played at Braemar. The economic downturn affected my disposable income so I focused on playing my Saturday morning golf at Braemar over the past'couple of years. I have seen Braemar at its best, condition (Wally McCarthy Tournament) and at its average. I am aware of the effort by the grounds crew to prepare the course each day and it is. appreciated. The challenge is both from an economic and commitment. standpoint. Consistency in course conditioning in all aspects of the.course is paramount. Although none greater than the green complex; greens, traps and mowing around the green complexes. In 2013.1 began to play all my weekday golf at other courses which provided improved greens conditions so the ability to chip, 1 putt and save par had a greater probability of happening. In 2013 I did not renew my men's club card because I wanted greater flexibility to play courses that met my criteria; appreciate my playing their course and excellent green complexes. For 2014 1 will again renew my patron card for Braemar. I intend to play at Braemar but will also play other courses. I know the.,challenges facing The City Council but believe the Wally McCarthy Tournament conditioning proved that the agronomy conditions at Braemar allows the course to be up to the challenge as we develop a master plan of much needed improvements in the coming years. The old saying is still true; "If you improve it they will come ". Today's financial situation for both consumer and City place a premium on being both prudent and selective on allocating entertainment dollar resources. I for one will continue to follow my passion for golf, I just don't know where my allegiances fall at this point. Best to you as you deal with the challenges. Regards, Gary R. Thacher 6901 Southdale Road Edina, MN 55435 952- 926 -6401 (Home) Deb Mangen From: Rosemary <jjellen341 @aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 7:35 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Sandra Nelson; Catherine Schoffman; Diane Both Sharon; Dick and Bonnie England; Bonnie McGrath Subject: Why close Fred Richards? City Council Members and Park Board Members: Please provide financial details;for this year's $485,000 golf course debt, "going forward ",to quote Scott Neal from his recent meeting. We all know that the golf course fund has always needed yearly subsides from the municipal liquor fund traditionally of $100,000 or less. Neither of the city's reports to Moody anticipated an increase in this, subsidy amount and certainly not of $400,00 or more. (And, at the same time, we also know the city's income has and will continue to increase markedly thanks to increased median home values and added commercial and multiple housing revenue sources.) So, why the plan put forward to close Fred Richards? Rosemary Jellen Sent from my iPad Deb Manoen From: Brent <Brent @REALTYGUY.NET> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 9:47 AM To: swensonannl @gmail.com joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Mary Brindle ( Comcast );jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject Fred Richards Golf course Mayor Hovland and Council members, I wish.to voice my support in saving the Fred Richards golf course. It is a wonderful gem in the midst of our city. If it is under- utilized it is only because it is under - marketed. It is the perfect course for families to teach their children golf, a wonderful short course for those who are on a "time- budget" or are no longer to walk a long course anymore. I could go on, but know that you are all busy people... thank you for your time and attention. Brent Johnson, Realty 6uyl Keller Williams Realty, Integrity Edina 952- 358 -9688, direct 612 - 298 -5000, cell 952 - 358- 9588,fax BrentJohnson@KW.com REALTY INTEGRITY EDINl 1 Deb.Mangen From: WILLIAM Lucas <wclucas @msn.com> Sent:, Monday, February 10, 201410:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf Course To the Mayor and Members of the City Council, I am writing to share my thoughts -about the staff proposal regarding the city's golf courses. The idea of improving the facilities is certainly a good one, but one part of the staff,proposal would definitely not be an improvement; that is the elimination of the two par four holes of the Braemar executive course, thereby converting the executive course to a par three course. This, together with the closing of the Fred Richards course, would mean we would no longer have any executive course in Edina. My grandsons and I play the Braemar executive course regularly .but we would not be interested in continuing to play there if it was only a par three course. undertand that the staff feels that the existing driving range is inadequate and should be enlarged to allow for longer practice shots, but this doesn't necessarily mean that the two par four holes of the executive course have to be eliminated. I would like to see further exploration of alternatives that would keep the executive course an executive course with the existing two par four holes, possibly by using some of the area that lies just to the west of the present hole number 4. Also, possibly the impact on the course resulting from modifying the driving range could be lessened somewhat by erecting a landscaped fence barrier at the north end of the driving range instead of lengthening the range to the extent proposed by the staff. Thank you for considering these ideas. Bill Lucas 7456 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55439 -2728 952 - 944 -8267 Deb Manaen From: Ann Kattreh Sent: Monday, February 10, 20141:26 PM To: Frank Petrovic; Janet Canton Subject FW: Pro Braemar Comments Attachments: Braemar A.xlsx; ATr00001.htm Hi Frank and Janet, Would you please include this in the Park Board and City Council information as requested? Thank you!! �3t Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director # F3 952 - 826 -0430 1 Fax 952 -B26 -0385 AKattrehOEdinaMN aov I www EdInaMN.ctav ...For Living, Learning, Rai`siri Y Families & Doing Business From: Eugene Nord fma11to:e1jnord @ ao1.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 1:01 PM To: Ann Kattreh Cc: Todd Anderson Subject: Pro Braemar Comments Dear Ann, .After analyzing the Edina Sun published data of the rounds played at The Braemar Golf enterprise from 2003 through 2013, I am now in total agreement with you and Scott that Fred Richards, under the current economic circumstances, be closed and that all golf activity be played at the Braemar facility. I- sympathize with those that play Fred Richards,and how much it means to them, but they need to look at and understand the big picture. Looking at my attachment, which in columns 5 and 6, compares F.R. to the total rounds, F.R. has declined the most every year compared to the other three venues Braemar 18, Braemar 9, and Braemar exec. Looking at it from an economical view, not only does F.R. lag behind the others, it generates less revenue per player. Those at F.R. do not utilize the driving range, the pro shop, or the grill at Braemar. And, more than likely, since many players are young and older players prefer to walk, the usage of carts per player is less. Ina perfect world, I would like to see Fred Richards, even if closed, remain in a position to reopen in a golf format if and when new concepts like Hack golf become a reality. F.R. would be a perfect setting for concepts of this nature and would not compete with the Braemar complex, and could conceivably be a self- sustaining entity. The closing of Fred Richards and investing monies into The Braemar Complex is important now, and more important for the future of Braemar. Ann, please forward this to Scott as well as to those on the Park Board and Council Members. Gene Nord. 6425 Nordic Circle Edina, 55439 Braemar Golf Enterprise Rounds in % of Decline Braemar Braemar ;'Braemar ' Fred Total Year X18 9 Exec Richards Rounds 2003 41,106 27,943 26,587 28,134 123,770 2008 34,534 30,212 22,038 25,875 112,663 2009 36,590 32,408 22,856 25,965 117,819 2010 32,106 28,738 18,578 21,965 101,387 2011 32,464 27,603 16,631 191073 9.5,771 2012 29,570 29,948 17,617 19,361 96,496 2013 23,814 24,404 15,377 15,934 79,529 Braemar Braemar Braemar Fred Total Year 18 9 Exec Richards Rounds 2003 vs 2013 42.07% 12.67% 42.16% 43.36% 35.74% 2008 vs 2013 31.04% 19.22% 30.23% 38.42% 29.41% 2009 vs 2013 34.92% 24.70% 32.72% 38.63% 32.50% 2010 vs 2013 25.83% 15.08% 17.23% 27.46% 21.56% 2011 vs 2013 26.64% 11.59% 7.54% 16.46% 16.96% Braemar Braemar Braemar Fred Total Year 18 9 Exec Richards Rounds 2003 vs 2012 28.06% -7.18% 33.74% 31.18% 22.04% 2008 vs 2012 14.37% 0.87% 20.06% 25.17% 14.35% 2009 vs 2012 19.19% 7.59% 22.92% 25.43% 18.10% 2010 vs 2012 7.90% -4.21% 5.17% 11.86% 4.82% 2011 vs 2012 8.91% -8.50% -5.93% -1.51% -0.76% Deb Mangen From: Heather Logan <hlogan8 @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 10, 20141:57 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com, swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Fwd: Letter - Keep Fred Richards Golf Course Open To Edina Mayor Hovland and City Council members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson: We are writing this regarding the proposal to close the Fred Richards Golf Course. This letter is testimony to our deep concern about what" appears to be a pre- ordained decision to close the course notwithstanding the negative impacts of this action on the property values in the Lake Edina area of the city. As described in the public presentation of the golf course plans, the plans themselves appear to have numerous logical holes. Many of these merit further discussion and review. Some of these are: • The greens fees at both courses are unreasonably low. We will pay double the fees if the course is to remain open. Others at the public meeting made similar statements. Has the City made a study of usage versus green fees for the Fred Richards course? If not, why not? • The comment was made at the plan disclosure meeting that the Fred Richard course operated on a cash - positive basis in 2012. The operating losses are therefore based on cost allocations which should be examined by the City Council to see if they are reasonable. Based on this one fact alone, it appears the closing of the Fred Richards course may be motivated by some other agenda. • If there is another agenda for the course "repurposement ", even though nothing has technically been prepared or presented to the City Council for approval, this agenda should be divulged to the community before the decision to close the course is made. • Why has the City staff rebuffed all neighbor meetings as this plan was being developed? According to published reports in The Star Tribune and elsewhere, the development community has met with the City Manager and others of the staff multiple times over the past year regarding the use of this property. Is this dichotomy appropriate? • Why is the City Council meeting one month after the first public disclosure on the plan without providing the neighbors sufficient time to prepare an alternate suggestion? • The Staff makes the point that closing the Fred Richards course and outsourcing concessions at Braemar will result in improved customer service. Customer service at the Fred Richards course is now excellent. Outsourcing may improve the revenue stream at Braemar, but that has nothing to do with customer service nor with the economic viability of the Fred Richards course. • Why is the issue of closing the Fred Richards course necessarily part of the decisions being made regarding the Braemar course? Is this because the funds to be received by the City to "repurpose" the Fred Richards course will subsidize the Braemar improvements? If so, shouldn't that be disclosed at this time? Notwithstanding this, shouldn't these two decisions be made separately? • Should the decision to close the Fred Richards course be subject to an Environmental Impact Study? If not, why not? • Should the closing of the Fred Richards course be considered a "taking" under the City powers? Should that not therefore merit compensation to the affected neighbors? We look forward to hearing the City's answers to these questions. Heather and Karl Bracken z Deb Mangen From: Joseph Hulbert <hulbert0089 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Jim Hovland; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague Subject: Overdue Braemar Golf Changes Please forward to Park Board and Council... When I served on the Park Board as chair, my focus was to get the city to pay attention to the management of their enterprise facilities. Braemar golf operations is our largest one. Braemar Golf Course was once a proud, respected public golf course. Over the past 30 years it rested on its reputation and was passed by years ago. In the past 18 -24 months Edina City Hall has undergone change with a new City Manager in Scott Neal and Parks Director Ann Kattreh: I'm excited for our community as they expect a higher standard of excellence. Already you can see some of the changes that have occurred with Edinborough Park's financial turnaround and the facelift at Braemar Arena. They have proposed changes to our golf operations and are looking for our facility managers to run their businesses like a business. I'm a lifelong golfer and lover of the game. One of the proposals is a tough pill to swallow but entirely in the best interest of golf in Edina. Sadly golf rounds have declined over the past 20 years and more golf courses close every year then open. We here in Edina have 45 holes of public golf and I can't think of a city nearby that comes close. We essentially have exclusive access to the the majority of the city's park acreage as a niche user group. I'm here to report that the trend nationwide for this is waning, particularly when the enterprise is losing close to a half million dollars annually. My biggest fear was that under past city management practices at some point in the future the entire golf operation would be at risk. So emotion aside, lets look at what we have. The original 18 is a design that many people see the hidden potential in, it needs work though. The tees, bunkers, cart paths, design cohesion along with various other items are long overdue. The driving range, which is their only predicable money maker is an embarrassment and should have been redone 20 years ago. The next generation of golfers (juniors) have been unable to play at the course. The past policy has been that juniors had to be 10 to play the executive and 12 to play on the regulation course. I have lost track of the stories of friends that have been turned away because the son/daughter was to young. The Wilds or Mpls. golf welcomed us. This is changing. The clubhouse is an add on, add on dysfunctional building. The food and beverage operation loses a captive audience daily to other locations. What other courses do you have to wait in line to order food, walk back up to retrieve food if you ever heard your name called and then bus your tables. Its terrible. So what is being proposed? Expand marketing Improve customer service Modify pricing and discounts Invest in improvements at Braemar The city is proposing to upgrade the facilities. One of which is a new expanded driving range. It is the operation that makes money and helps their instructors lead by Joe Gruepner that are actually bringing in the next generation of Jr. golfers. Bring in a 3rd party food and beverage operator that will undoubtably recognize the incredible location and lack of competition. Have a food and beverage service that would drive you to come to Braemar for the food as a restaurant option. Close Fred Richards. This is the BIG issue here. I live 100 yards from Fred Richards. My son and I play at Fred Richards weekly and selfishly would miss the ability to walk to a course. Our community's needs and demands have changed. We did have lacrosse/ flag football /ultimate frisbee leagues 2Q years ago. THE biggest change we have see is the growth in participation of GIRLS sports. We now have a unmet demand for "multi purpose athletic fields ". We simply .do not have enough fields to satisfy all the associations and they have to turn some kids, away. So if the utilization of Fred Richards golf is around 40% and it can be'met at Braemar, our community at large is best served with the change. It would also eliminate much of the duplication .. of equipment etc. Yes, it would then lose money as a typical park, but we as a community do not hold publicly accessible parks to cost recovery standards. There is no expectation that a swing set in the park is going to do anything other than cost money. I have not idea of what a "repurposed" Fred Richards would look like. But if we could add even one field and build something with community involvement its worth exploring. The residents of the Cornelia need to be involved and assured that plans are for something GREAT and SAFE. It will always remain a park, but perhaps something we can all use. I believe City Council and city staff are tired of average and want higher standards from our park system that we can all be proud of. The path of least resistance would be to continue past failing practices and do nothing. Please help restore Braemar Golf to its past standards of excellence. I understand that this is not an easy decision and one that I struggled with for a while. We have a community who's needs have changed and its difficult sometimes to come to terms with. If we are going to take from golf I would like to see something given back which I'm comfortable the city is committed to doing for Braemar Golf. If, we are taking a use away from a neighborhood, I have seen how this city sincerely works to give something great back. I'm expecting no less this time. Thanks for reading, Joseph Hulbert 7507 West Shore Drive Deb Mangen From: Ken Potts <KPotts @mcgough.com> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 201411:13 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Heather Beal (constellationcreate @comcast.net); karstenpotts @gmail.com Subject: Worksession follow up Edina City Council Members, I am writing with follow up comments to the residential redevelopment discussion at the Work Session on February 3, 2014. Good information was presented, Section 411 has improved City processes, and staff is doing a better job overseeing residential construction in the spirit of the City Code. There remain many more areas where ongoing improvements can be made, in particular with the review process of permit submissions and Code enforcement. I cite here just two examples here of code violations relative to one jobsite at 4238 Crocker Ave. There have been several others I would like to share along with what could be improved regulatory practices. This is in the spirit of suggesting process improvements to Council. Ross Bintner referred to a soil import threshold of 50 cubic yards as being a trigger for increased Watershed District oversight. At 4238 Crocker Ave, the builder, Refined, listed a quantity of 50 cubic yards of fill in the Permit Application, then imported more than 250 yards. We called this to the attention of the City and the Watershed' District. To our knowledge no enforcement has taken place nor penalty been imposed. Damage to the adjacent property has already been significant; future impacts to stormwater drainage patterns are unknown. 2. Plans submitted by the builder, Refined, to the City include violation of the side yard setback (relative to building wall height). The plans were reviewed and approved for construction rather than being required to go through the variance process. Final resolution remains uncertain as updated submissions do not contain sufficient information per the City's own Site Plan requirements; yet staff stated they intend to issue a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The resulting impact to both public and private property is significantly detrimental. I am offering to make a presentation to Council of how the errors, and false and misleading information on the permit documents could have been identified prior to the start of construction. The permit documents at 4238 Crocker Ave contained violations to the City of Edina Code, the State of Minnesota Code and the International Residential Code. I am prepared to present these in an objective and factual manner for review by Council. Thank you, Ken Potts Deb Mangen From: Podaly Jay <podalyjay @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 201410:38 PM To: Edina Mail;jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: PLEASE SAVE FRED It is a mistake to close the Fred Richards course. Many, children, including our own, learn to play golf there. 1 February 9, 2014 Dear Ms. Kattreh: This is about your desire to close Fred Richards golf course. This as I understand it, is solely about saving money. The fact that it is now subsidized and will require additional money for the foreseeable future is not disputed. The amount such as $200,000 to restabilize the soil and the irrigation system maintenance is debatable, but that is for a different discussion. My analysis of the dollar savings stops after a few minutes because the cost, bonds, maintenance, etc., for the future use of the property is a complete unknown. I assume it will be a park. Parks require an initial investment, as well as subsequent yearly maintenance costs. I appreciate that drafting and providing a detailed plan could be a poor investment in light of the fact it may never happen. Given that we agree on that, then maybe we can agree on a premise in which extreme design concepts on either end of the spectrum (least to most) can be estimated with broad cost dollar figures. What I mean is, the "least" being leaving the land almost as is, with only paths, picnic areas, and the remainder mowable grass; and, the "most" being a Centennial Park -type design with an enhanced walled pond, and/or ballparks, miniature golf, and other imaginative features. Conduct a brainstorming session with just a few people and the list will be pages long. I just thought of vegetable garden? Yes, it is a guess, but with your park people having many years of experience, I would judge the estimate to be one of a good educated guess. In business, myself, being a minor real estate developer and employed for 30+ years as a mechanical development engineer involved with design needed to push the state of the art in computers, such educated estimates are a requirement of any new design initiative, and these estimates are most often exceeded, but being so, the projects can be funded accordingly. I know knowing such estimates delays your project on the decision to close Fred Richards or give it a go ahead. But, in your cost analysis, please remember, parks do not pay for themselves. On another subject, but related, is the Pentagon Office area redesign: I am guessing they will be affected in a major way depending on the decision. taken on Fred Richards. My bet is that a decision for a park would be favored by a wide margin. This is not a criticism in any way or form, but I know their design looks better with a park adjacent to their property. I assume they are pushing for a decision, or they should. Given the PR, you will not detect a bias in favor of a park. On the assumption that Fred Richards will become a park, I wish to voice a concern. My home is the last on Kellogg next to the cul de sac. Please do not extend Kellogg into the park area. Heavy traffic on my street will be the result. It will be bad enough that it is a dead end, and cars will park in the cul de sac on Kellogg Avenue. Done! Sorry so long. Sincerely, A. G. Lowell 7505 Kellogg Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 952- 927 -5773 Deb Mangen From: cdemosslaw @aol.com Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 6:39 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course -- Please forward to the Mayor and the members of the City Council Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged To the Mayor of Edina, and the Edina City Council: I am writing regarding the future of the Fred Richards Golf Course. am very concerned about the proposal to close the golf course, and even more concerned that the city leaders appear (and have also stated as such) to be in favor of this plan despite an overwhelming response from the citizens of Edina AGAINST closing the golf 'course. There is NOT a groundswell of support for closure from the citizens, and in fact there is great frustration among the citizens that the city leaders do not appear to regard the wishes of the citizens. Please remember that the citizens have elected its officials and leaders to lead. Thls does not mean that the citizens want to be outside the process, or that they want to give up their voice. In fact, we elect our leaders to carry out our wishes, and to carry out the business of the city. It is clear to the citizens that there is vast support by the city council for closing the golf course; and this is in direct conflict with the wishes of the citizens. This golf course is one of the various amenities of Edina which makes Edina special. It has broad support among the young and the old, girls and boys, women and men. The plan presented by the City Manager appears to be a " pet project" of his, as well as certain members of the city council; and.of the developer involved,with this proposal. Whether it is something that the City Manager and city council want, the citizens' wishes must have greater weight. I am deeply concerned that, in spite of the articulate and reasonable wishes of the citizens, that the city council appears eager to vote to close rthe golf course, in the face of great opposition from the very people to whom they are responsible. I also find it very interesting that this particular issue, and the City of Edina's apparent position to close the Fred Richards Golf Course in spite of great opposition from the citizens /voters has brought together and united citizens that are Democrats, Independents and Republicans. This is something which the city council and Mayor should take into consideration in looking at this issue and making their decision. This is not just one neighborhood's issue. This is now the issue of a vast cross - section of the citizens; and they are not happy that their wishes are not being respected. This is our city. It is up to the citizens to determine whether they want this golf course to survive. The citizens want Fred Richards Golf Course to continue operating. Please look carefully at this issue once more; and please listen carefully to your citizens. Please vote FOR keeping Fred Richards Golf Course open; and AGAINST its closing. Respectfully submitted, Christine Moe Edina, Minnesota Deb Manuen From: Wayne Vander Vort <wvandervort@isurtec.com> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:48 PM To: Edina Mail Cc jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle ( Comcast );joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course. Attachments: The New York Times_ A Return to the Nine -Hole Round-May 9 2013.pdf Importance: High Friday, February 7, 2014 Honorable James Hovland Mayor of City of Edina City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: I am 77 years old and have been a resident of Edina for fifty four years. I have raised six children in Edina and all have graduated from Edina High School. I have fifteen grandchildren and twelve live in Edina. This is the first time in fifty four years I have written to any public official of Edina expressing my concern regarding a major community issue /decision under consideration by the City Council. First, I thank you for attending the Public Hearing last week conducted by City Manager, Scott Neal. However, I am deeply disappointed that other members of the City Council failed to attend, or did not consider it important or worth their time to attend. The good news is you heard many concerned citizens. expressing their opposition in the proposed closing of the Fred Richards Golf Course ( "FR "). You have undoubtedly received or will receive countless emails, phone calls, voice message, petitions opposing the closing of ( "FR "). For the record, I am totally opposed closing FR. I respectfully submit the following comments, thoughts and recommendations. ❖ I am and have been a Braemar Golf Patron. I play FR on a - regular basis as well as the Braemar Executive and Braemar 18. 1 play FR with my adult children, daughter in law and now have the opportunity and privilege teaching and playing with my young grandchildren at FR. In addition, a neighborhood men's group ( "Gilford Golf Guys ") have a standing tee time each week at FR. I also play other public and private course. in MN and AZ. I am also a member of Edina Country Club. ❖ FR provides a unique opportunity for a variety of golfers. The demographics of FR "users" seem to be divided among (i) young players, (ii) senior citizens, (iii) league play, et cetera. The topography. (flat) of FR is attractive to these users, whereas the Braemar Executive topography (hilly) is not appealing for many of the younger players, senior citizens and league players. Contrary to staff's assumptions, I challenge .:whether even twenty (20 %) percent of current users of FR will transfer over to Braemar. Furthermore, if the Braemar Executive is converted to a Par 3, as proposed, there may be less transferring over to the proposed Par 3. 1 have personally spoken with the chairperson of one large lady leagues at FR and was told they would not transfer to Braemar but rather play at Hyland Green Golf Course in Bloomington, MN. [Comment: to my knowledge staff has' not interviewed any of the leagues playing at FR to ascertain if they would transfer over to Braemar, yet Staffs assumption is > 50% would transfer.] It should also be noted that FR is a course where young girls and boys can begin learning',to play golf. The Edina' Boys' Head Golf Coach, Phil Finanger, stated at the Public Hearing, "Fred ;Richards would bl,es missed, as many pointed out at the meeting, by the youth of Edina.: 4- For the record, I am in total agreement with several proposed changes made by staff regarding the Edina municipal golf operations, to -wit: Additional investments in various improvements at Braemar, i.e. (i) renovation of the driving range as proposed; (ii) converting the Braemar Executive course into a Par 3 course; (iii) modifying the existing price /fee structure; (iv) outsource the grill and restaurant operations of the club house, [if possible, provided it is on a net, net, net basis to the less6a4hird party operator]; (v) greatly expand marketing and visibility of all the Braemar Golf Enterprise Units (including FR) ❖ I have read the Executive Summary, City of Edina Golf System, Strategic Outlook and Analysis, prepared by NGF Consulting, Jupiter, FL, dated August 2011 ( "NGF Report") . I also read the Matt .Fulton Consulting Report of 2013 ( "Fulton Report")." It is abundantly clear the NGF Report does not recommend the closing of FR and opines retaining FR with minimum costs/expenses for improvements. It is apparent the Fulton Report was biases "from the beginning and perhaps was directed to reach the conclusion in closing FR. The Fulton Report was not of the same caliber as the NGF Report nor was the consultant of the Fulton Report qualified or recognized as a nationally golf course consultant. The NGF Report stated in part, "...The ultimate goal of this project is to create a formal business plan for the city golf courses that will put the system on a path toward long -term stability and sustainably." From the start, the Fulton Report was to conclude with closing FR. ❖ Finally, I respectfully submit the Save FR Action Committee can and will prepare and provide the City Council with an alternative financial model, wherein FR can continue operating in the future and the other recommendations of staff pertaining to improvements to the Braemar Golf Enterprise Units can also be accomplished. These two goals can be achieved together without excluding the other. However, the City Council needs to "stay" or defer any further action on closing FR for 90 -180 days for an alternative financial model to be prepared and submitted by the Save FR Action Committee. I believe this is a reasonable and thoughtful request. I therefore respectfully submit your favorable consideration in deferring any City Council action on the closing of FR for 90 -180 days, during which an ad hoc committee of Save Fred Richards will interact with the administration of Edina and submit a counter financial model establishing FR can be a break even as a unit within the Braemar Golf Enterprise. I am confident such a model can be designed. Thank you. Respectfully, Wayne Wayne A. Vander Vort 4525 Gilford Drive Edina, MN 55435. Cell: (612) =597 -3038 E -mail: wvandervort(a-)-com cast. net 2/612014 To Lure New Golfers, a Push for aShorter Round - NYTimes.com �llc lrtu �arlC �:imer� May 5, 2013 A Returntq the Nine -Hole Round By BILL PENNINGTON ..t...:., Less than 3o years ago, nearly half of the golf courses in America had nine holes. There was no stigma to that number. The nine -hole golf round was as common as a slice off the first tee. As golf boomed late in the loth century, the vast majority of new courses had 18 holes, and gradually,.as everything in golf seemed to growliigger and longer, the 18 -hole round was granted an unofficial; but. understood, imprimatur as real golf. Which left a mine -hole round as something else. None of this was done purposefully. Yes, tournament golf was most commonly 18 holes— the number harks back to St. Andrews in Scotland, even if that number in the mid- 1700s could just as easily have settled at 14 or 22. Whatever the official number, for decades, the nine -hole round was nonetheless widely accepted. .InAmerica, most.of the early golf courses were nine- hofers. The first United States Open, in 1895, was played on a nine -hole course. More 18 -hole courses were built in the middle part of the last century, but playing only nine holes on those tracts was still commonplace well into the .198os. The logos changed everything. That was when everything about golf was aggrandized. Remember when everyone fi om Tiger Woods to you and me wore oversized golf shirts with sleeves that hung down to our forearms? And we took five Hours — or more — to play 18 holes. We know what happened to the ever - ballooning game of golf. Things have been substantially trimmed since then. And if the five -hour round has not disappeared, some golfers have, walking away because they do not have time for a round of 18. To the .rescue: the nine -hole round. "We've got to get some people thinking again about nine holes that take two hours to ^eau " said Ted Bishop, the president of the P.G.A. of America and the owner of a 45 -hole ' MORE IN Gt south of Indianapolis. "It's a good way to target lapsed golfers and new golfers, 00 Round round has its place, but: let's see how many people we. can attract. to the gaine ,� � Father quick nine holes." Road Nbre h9p: /Mvwv.nytlmes,conM131Q6/0 .! sports7Qolflto-lure- limv- gafOrs- a- pushrfor- a-snuricr ..round_ rd ?fir= 0&pagev�ntecf =;36M 113 218/2014 To Lure New Gutters, a Push for a Shorter Found - NYTirnes.eom Bishop offers a $19 nine-hole round seven: days a week, with or without a golf cart, after 4 P.M. "It's brought a real spike in the number of rounds played," Bishop said. "And it's been a lot of people I haven't seen. before." This week, the P.G.A. of America has teamed with the United States Golf Association in an initiative spearheaded by Golf Digest called Time for Nine. The magazine's June issue, which comes out Tuesday, starts a campaign for nine -hole play. Golf Digest plans to create a list of nine -hole courses that will focus on promoting nine -hole rounds for men, women, juniors and families on layouts that make it easy to do so. The list will appear at Golfdigest.com, and golfers are encouraged to submit qualifying courses to editors@golfdigest.com, q.isfine @pga.com or-Timeforg@usga.org. "We're not trying to get everyone who plays 18 holes to play nine holes instead," Jerry Tarde, Golf Digest's chairman and editor in chief, said "We're after the people who aren't playing because they think golf is a half -day proposition, which it isn't. "The message is that nine -hole golf is legitimate golf. It is. not half golf or kids' golf." Although about 8o percent of American golf courses have layouts that bring the ninth hole back to the clubhouse — making it easy to charge for and route golfers on nine -hole cycles — many courses do not offer stand - alone, nine -hole greens fees. That. is something the initiative hopes to change. "As an industry, we must work to promote the nine -hole rotund as a complete and enjoyable golf experience, consistent with the traditions of playing the game," Glen D. Nager, the president of the United States Golf Association, said. And for people worried about their handicaps, the U.S.G.A. wants golfers to know that nine -hole rounds are fully compatible with its handicap system. There is no doubt that the push to promote nine -Bole rounds reflects a reality that most of us now work longer hours and have more demands on our weekend recreational time. As Tarde said: "Every other recreation, it seems, takes more or less two hours: movies, dinner, cocktail parties, tennis, bowling, going to the �ky-m. If golf were invented today, it would be a nine -hole game." There are other reasons to consider a nine -hole round when a full 18 holes may, not fit your hrp;//N nnv, ny.. irrr?s, canJ2013ii5' MsportsirlolfFo-i Lire- new-gdfers- a. push-for -a- shorter- round.htnl?! =0&(Rkyewmited -pritit 2 a 2/612014 To Lure New Golfers, a Push for 7 Shorter Round- NYTimes.com Plans. A nine -hole round, like many of the more than 4,000 old- style, nine -hole courses still. remaining in America, is almost a state of mind. It has a separate pace from its full- fledged brethren; which is not to denigrate an 18 -hole round and the distinctive rewards it yields. But a,nine-hole round seems inherently relaxed, an enterprise that is neither hurried nor filled with expectation. It feels more like leisure, which is the goal, isn't it? "Often at 5.pan., I'll go to the range and beat balls for two hours," Bishop said last week. "The other day at 5, I went and played nine Boles with my daughter instead. I told my wife later that I wasn't as tired, and I might have improved my game more, too. "A light went on .in my head. I'm not going to beat so many balls at the range, I'm going to go play golf." I remember doing something very similar a few ,years ago, pulling off the highway toward the end of a long day to play nine holes with my 1i- year =old son at the public Rip Van Winkle Country Club in the foothills of the Catskill Mountains in New York. The course, known as the Rip, was designed in i.gig by Donald Ross. Greens fees were about $i5. I don't remember our scores from that evening. I do remember a clog lazily chasing a deer across one fairway. I recall ducks quacking, a fish jumping in a pond and a stunning view of a inlountain ridge. About two hours later, we were back in the car refreshed. Golf is many things to many people, as it should be. But we can keep more people in our flock, and attract others to join us, if we endorse the most simple, natural and unpretentious forms of participation. Inviting people to come out for an easy, quick nine holes .is a good way to start. hti. P:? nwwv. nyWr, es .corrJ2013t0W„iG6lsports!golfito -lure' golfers -a -push- for -e- shorter- randhtr ? r =0&Pagewinted=pnnF 33 Deb Mangen From: Thomas & Margaret Mattison <balsamlake @aol.com> Sent Friday, February 07, 2014 3:36 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Thomas & Margaret Mattison Subject: Railroad Re -route Impact on Edina Dear Mayor Hovland: I noted the continuing coverage of the Southwest Light Rail proposal in the StarTribune's article on Thursday Feb 6th. At the end of the article it stated that you said" that the new plan is promising and merited further study." What I would like to know is if a reroute plan is approved through St. Louis Park, will rail traffic on theMN &S tracks through Edina increase in the same proportion. Or are the tracks`and traffic through Edina not affected? We now usually have two short trains daily coming through the area that I reside in near Vernon and 50th Ave., Jerry's Foods, Our Lady of Grace Church, etc. However, I believe that additional trains have been passing through in the last 6 months during the late evening. I know that you are very busy with City Matters, and I appreciate the time you can take for a reply. With respect, Thomas Mattison, Board of Directors Member - - - - 5250 Grandview Square #2410 I Edina, MN. 55436 1 Deb Manuen From: thomas bracken <tombracken @msn.com> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:45 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2@comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @ gmail.com Subject: Letter - Keep Fred Richards Golf Course Open To Edina Mayor Hovland and City Council members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson: We are writing this regarding the proposal to close the Fred Richards Golf Course. This letter is testimony to our deep concern about what appears to be a pre - ordained decision'to close the course notwithstanding the negative impacts of this action on the property values in the Lake Edina area of the city. We moved to Edina in 2012. When we bought our house at 7412'West Shore Drive, one of the marketing features was that the house is within walking distance of "the course. One of us (Tom Bracken) has played at the course approximately twice a week from the date of his retirement until the course closed for the winter. The course is an asset for the City, particularly for the youth and seniors in the area. Our concern about closing the course is primarily economic. We estimate our home value, and the value of the homes like ours which do not face the course, will decline by $25,000 each. Those that do face the golf course will suffer significantly higher decreased values. I estimate the loss in home values at $2.7M for the 104 houses within a two block radius that do not front the course, and an additional $2.1M loss in value for the homes that do front the course. The losses may be higher than these figures if the course is "repurposed" to some other use that involves more traffic, commercial development, or a less scenic outlook. If the course is closed we will appeal our tax assessment. We expect other neighbors will do likewise. As described in the public presentation of the golf course plans, the plans'themselves appear to have numerous logical holes. Many of these merit further discussion and review. Some of these are: • The plan presumes the golfers from the Fred Richards Course will transfer their usage to Braemar. In Tom's case that is highly unlikely. If he has to drive somewhere else, he will have many other alternatives and will likely not go to Braemar. The projections for usage transfer to Braemar may be too aggressive. • The greens fees at both courses are unreasonably low. Tom will pay double the fees if the course is to remain open. Others at the public meeting made similar statements. Has the City made a study of usage versus green fees for the Fred Richards course? If not, why not? • The comment was made at the plan disclosure meeting that the Fred Richard course operated on a cash - positive basis in 2012. The operating losses are therefore based on cost allocations which should be examined by the City Council to see if they are reasonable. Based on this one fact alone, it appears the closing of the Fred Richards course may be motivated by some other agenda. • If there is another agenda for the course "repurposement ", even though nothing has technically been prepared or presented to the City Council for approval, this agenda should be divulged to the community before the decision to close the course is made. • Why has the City staff rebuffed all neighbor meetings as this plan was being developed ?. According to published reports in The Star Tribune and elsewhere, the development community has met with the City Manager and others of the staff multiple times over the past year regarding the use of this property. Is this dichotomy appropriate? • Why is the City Council meeting one month after the first public disclosure on the plan without providing the neighbors sufficient time to prepare an alternate suggestion? • The Staff makes the point that closing the Fred Richards course and outsourcing concessions at Braemar will result in improved customer service. Customer service at the Fred Richards course is now excellent. Outsourcing may improve the revenue stream at Braemar, but that has nothing to do with customer service nor with the economic viability of the Fred Richards course. • Why is the issue of closing the Fred ° Richards course necessarily part of the decisions being made regarding the Braemar course? Is this because the funds to be received by the City to "repurpose" the Fred Richards course will subsidize the Braemar improvements? If so, shouldn't that be disclosed at this time? Notwithstanding this, shouldn't these two decisions be made separately? • Should the decision to close the Fred Richards course be subject to an Environmental Impact Study? If not, why not? • Should the closing of the Fred Richards course be considered a "taking" under the City powers? Should that not therefore merit compensation to the affected neighbors? Tom will be attending both the Park Commission meeting next Tuesday and the City Council meeting in early March. Linda will be unable to attend these meetings due to her work schedule. We look forward to hearing the City's answers to these questions. Tom Bracken Linda Bracken 7412 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 415 - 271 -1570 (Tom) 650-823-4501 (Linda), tombracl<en @msn.com libracken @mac.com Deb Mangen From: Sprague, Josh <joshsprague @edinarealty.com> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:03 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Fred Richards GC Please forward to Council. From: Doug Smalley <dougLlas.smalley@gLnail.com> Date: February 4, 2014 at 3:18:06 PM CST To: mail@a,edinamn.gov Subject: Fred Richards GC Dear Members of the Edina City Council, As a relatively new member of the Cornelia neighborhood living a few blocks from Fred Richards GC I'm writing to express my support for the contemplated redevelopment of that property as expanded park space. I'm an avid golfer, actually, but believe residents and families in the area would derive much more year -round & day -to -day benefit from a larger more intentionally managed park in that location. Not only would we use it heavily (2 kids + dog) but I imagine the families living in the rental /apartment housing nearby would love it too since Arneson Acres isn't really walkable for those of us in this quadrant. I'm not intimately familiar with the financials, but if the course is on the bubble or in the red it seems to me that redevelopment as a park makes great sense. I know if would enhance the quality of life for those of us living nearby. Thank'you! // Doug Smalley // Email: douglas.smalleynn,gmail.com // Mobile: 651- 955 -8899 4412 Fondell Dr, 55435 Moved in December 2012 from St. Paul. Deb Mangen From: Cynthia Nicoski <nicoski @comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 20141:33 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: SAVE the Fred Richards Golf Course To: Mayor James Hovland The timeline proposed to even think about eliminating the "Fred Richards Golf Course" is offensive. The City should develop alternative proposals to keep the "Fred Richards Golf Course ". My family, friends and neighbors have all enjoyed and want to continue to enjoy playing golf at this local wonderful Golf Course. We want this golf course available for future generations of golfers to use and enjoy. The community is willing to help SAVE this golf course just let us know how we can help provide assistance. The "Fred Richards Golf Course" is used and enjoyed by Edina, Bloomington, Richfield and many other surrounding residents. I am currently out of town and unable to attend the meetings currently being held but want you to know how much the "Fred Richards Golf Course" means to so many residents and even if we are out of town we are taking the time to ensure you know how much the "Fred Richards Golf Course" means to all of us. PLEASE "SAVE the Fred Richards Golf Course." Cynthia Norton 132 East 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 Deb Mangen From: J M Schedin <schedvi @hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 1:54 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Beekeeping Dear Mayor and Council Members, In month of January I read no fewer than four stories in the Star Tribune related to honeybees: "State Agencies Develop Protection for Honey Bees ", "Eden Prairie Considers Backyard Beekeeping ", More Twin Cities Suburbs are Growing Sweet on Bees" and "Minnesotans Take Threats to Pollinators to Heart". Edina has always been known as an environmentally progressive city. It's difficult to open a paper and not read something about Edina's do.Town initiative, Edina Go Green, the Edina Garden Council, the Centennial. Lakes Farmer's Market, Arneson Acres greenhouse, upgrades and enhancements to our park system, solar panels on city hall, electric vehicles used by city staff, the emphasis on single -sort recycling, water conservation, new bicycle routes — and the list goes on. It would seem that as more Minnesota residents are becoming sympathetic to the plight of honeybees, and as state agencies are beginning to develop protections for them, Edina is slowly becoming an island unto itself. For some reason Edina is one of a very small number of cities that outright prohibits the keeping of bees. The reason for this prohibition is not even known to Tim Hunter, Edina's Animal Control Officer — a fact which I gleaned from an August 2011 Edina Magazine article entitled "Edina Hobbyist Beekeepers ". This interesting article explained how an Edina father and his two sons were required to travel outside of the city to engage in their hobby of beekeeping. After reading the article I felt discouraged that Edina residents were forced to go somewhere outside of the city to engage in a hobby that is legally allowed by the cities of Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Minneapolis, Eden Prairie and Bloomington (all cities which surround Edina). In terms of the serious issues that a city council routinely wrestles with, I realize that honeybees are probably not at the top of your list. However, as a resident of this city I am respectfully requesting that the Edina City Council initiate the steps needed to change our city code to allow for the keeping of honeybees in Edina within all zoning districts. This could be done through the elimination of the current ordinance prohibiting beekeeping, or by instituting a new ordinance with specific requirements. As the author of the City of Eden Prairie's new ordinance on beekeeping, I have done a lot of research on honeybees over the past year. I'd be happy to meet with any of you to discuss the facts, answer questions, share my research and address any concerns that you may have. Sincerely, Jim Schedin 6041 Wooddale Ave Edina, MN 55424 Deb Mangen From: R.1. Smiley <par4rj @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 4:06 PM To: Edina Mail; Ann Swenson; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Ann Kattreh Subject: Edina Golf Enterprise Greetings to All Part of being elected to public office involves making difficult decisions. The decision on the closing of Fred Richards Golf Course is yours and yours alone - no other citizens are allowed to vote. As time passes, you will each be asked to defend your decision. The more information that you have the better job will do defending that decision. Please allow me to assist you, collectively, to make an informed decision. First my.background: • I have been an Edina resident since 1978. • I am 70 years old and have made my living in the Business of Golf as a developer, owner, manager and consultant. • I am a Golf Digest Rating Panelist - Helping Gotf Digest select the best of the best. • I am a tournament golfer and have won tournaments in seven decades. • Last summer I played 47 different golf courses. • As an owner /manager, I quickly learned that golf is a REPEAT CUSTOMER BUSINESS, golfers will PAY to PLAY a golf course that is not in perfect condition, but they must be made to FEEL WELCOME!, CUSTOMER SERVICE is the key to success! • My goal as owner /manager was to make every customer (new or old) a repeat customer and sell every tee time every day. My observations: • The current golf market in Edina will not support 45 holes of golf. • Spreading a reduced maintenance budget over 45 holes produces mediocre results, at best - on every course. • Customer Service at Braemar has deteriorated over the past few seasons. • There is an "obvious" demand for an executive golf course in Edina. • There are not enough rounds played at Edina's two executive courses (total) to fill the tee sheet at one executive course. • The expenses to run and maintain an executive course, not located within the Braemar complex, are excessive. • Nobody wants to play the Clunie Nine. • The Clunie Nine will not make a good executive golf course. Too hard to walk. Too hard to score. Too many balls are last. • The driving range, with declining revenues, is in a perfect urban location. It is out dated and requires a complete make over. My recommendations: • Close Fred Richards Golf Course after the 2014 season. • Immediately, invest in a master redevelopment plan at the Braemar location. • The master plan should encompass the existing 36 holes and driving range (Including tees, greens, irrigation and club house). • The goal of the master plan would be to have 27 -holes of quality golf at Braemar (I believe that 27 -holes could play near capacity), including a quality executive course (that could include parts of current Hayes and/or Castle Nines) and a superior quality 18 -hole golf course (that could include parts of Clunie Nine) along with the best driving range in the Twin Cities (the demand is there and would make money). The remaining land (the unused holes) should be allowed to revert back to natural areas within the nine -mile creek water shed district. As a citizen of Edina, I want to be proud of the recreational amenities that are available to citizens and visitors. Speaking as a Golf Digest Panelist - of the 47 courses I played last year, Braemar ranked ninth from the bottom. Respectfully, RJ Smiley 612 - 750 -6303 par4ri@gniail.com 2 Deb Mangen From: Joni Bennett <jo niben nett12 @corn cast. net> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:36 AM To: Deb Mangen Cc: Scott Neal; Ann Kattreh Subject: Fwd: Fred Richards Golf Course Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good Morning, Deb - Mary Rogers' email to me was included in the Council correspondence packet for the Monday, February 3 meeting. Would you please share my response to her with the other Council members and include it in the next public packet? Thank you - Joni Bennett jonibennettl2@comcast.net 952- 927 -0661 Begin forwarded message: From: Joni Bennett <ionibennett12Ca)comcast.net> Date: February 1, 2014 3:02:38 PM CST To: Mary Rogers <minnesotamaryannCa--)gmaii.com> Subject: Re: Fred Richards Golf Course Hi, Mary - Thank you for your email and thoughts. When we spoke last year, I referred to the Quality of Life telephone survey of Edina residents conducted for the city in 2011 and 2013. Survey results are published on the city website at www.EdinaMN.gov. Each statistically- significant survey asked the following question: "I will now read you a short list of park and recreational opportunities within the City. First, for each one, please tell me if you or members of your household have used it during the past year. Then, for those you have used, please rate it as excellent, good, only fair, or poor." In 2013, the questions about park and recreation facility use were numbers 85 through 95. In 2011, the questions were numbers 71 through 80. Here are the results about use, with 2013 answers first - 83% of respondents stated that they or a member of their household had used neighborhood parks within the past year, up from 73% in 2011. 79% had used city trails, the same percentage as in 2011. 67% had used Centennial Lakes Park, down slightly from 69% in 2011. 48% had used community athletic facilities; 45% reported use of community play fields in 2011. 47 %o had used Edinborough Park, down just slightly from 48% in 2011. 45% had used the Art Center, up from 33% in 2011... 42% had used Braemar ;Golf Course, up from 36% in-201 1. 38% had used the Aquatic Center, down just slightly from 39% in 2011. 33% had used the Senior Center, down slightly from 35% in 2011. 32% had used Braemar Ice Arena, up slightly from 30% in 2011. 24% had used Fred Richards Golf Course. (The 2011 survey did not ask about use of Fred Richards Golf Course.) I do not know what the final decision will be about Fred Richards Golf Course, but know that the entire City Council supports keeping it city park land. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts with me. I will continue to study the issues carefully. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. Regards, Joni ionibennettl2@comcast.net 952- 927 -0661 On Jan 31, 2014, at 7:08 PM, Mary Rogers wrote: Hi Joni, I've thought about your comments about Fred Richards when we last talked. You said that only one - fourth of Edina home (or residents), I don't recall which, used Fred Richards Golf Course in the previous year. I think that is actually tremendous.. What other sports venue can boast that? It also brings people from neighboring communities who don't have such a gem. (They're also likely to shop,at nearby Southdale or eat afterward at one of the local restaurants). When I retired I took up golf, and Fred Richards was where I was introduced to golf. I have also introduced. golf to Caitlin there, as. well as my grandson, and stepson. It is, such a beautiful, unique spot in Edina, that is ideal for young and old. We have a lot of other parks and we have the regulation Braemar (which I also use), but Fred Richards is a special golf course. I do hope the city council can see a way to keep it open. Thank you, Mary Rogers 2 Februay 5, 2014 Mr. Chad E. Legve Director of Environment Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55450 Dear Chad and John; Mr. John Bergman At -Large Communities Representative Noise Oversight Committee 6040 28th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55450 The City of Edina currently has no established aviation noise baseline because there are no MAC owned and operated remote monitoring towers (RMTs) in our city. City officials in Edina feel the establishment of an aviation noise baseline for our community is important as it provides a baseline for both MAC and City officials to measure the impacts of future navigational changes on noise levels in our community. The City of Edina requests that MAC purchase, install and manage three RMTs in Edina to establish this baseline. The City stands ready to assist MAC with suggestions of possible locations for the new RMTs, including a number of locations on municipal property. Please advise on next steps. Thank you. Sincerely, Scott H. Neal City Manager CC: Mayor, and City.Council Lisa Pelien Jeff Hamiel CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th-Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952- 927 -8861 . Fax 952- 826 -0390 February 1; 2014 Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424, Dear Edina City Council Members, On behalf of suburban youth experiencing homelessness and instability, thank you for renewing the City's grant to Oasis for Youth for 2014. The $2,000 grant 'will.be used to fund Oasis' general operations, as described in our proposal to the: Human.Services Task Force. The young people who come to Oasis often find themselves navigating difficult life circumstances on their own. This support from the City of Edina means that they do not have to continue to struggle on their own, but can rely on assistance from Oasis for Youth. Edina is a community that places a high value on making sure that resources and opportunities are available for all residents. In addition to this.grant from the City, Oasis for Youth recently received both endorsement and funding from the Edina Community Foundation through the Edina Challenge. We are proud to be a part of this significant community initiative aimed at mitigatingthe effects of poverty on children living in Edina and look forward to working with other endorsed programs to support Edina's young people. At Oasis for Youth we know that when community leaders commit resources to those who are most in need, others will follow suit. The City of Edina's 2014 $2,000 grant will help insure that Oasis for Youth will continue to be a place where suburban youth experiencing homelessness and instability can find resources, referrals, and connections to caring adults in theirown community. Thank you for your continuing support and for your concern for all Edina residents. Sincerely, Leslie Stiles President, Board of Directors Cc: Edina Human Services Task Force For tax purposes, no gifts or services were provided in exchange for this donation. Oasis for Youth is a 501(p)(3) non - profit organization: Tax ID number 45- 3683785. 2200 West Old Shakopee Road I Bloomington, MN 55431 1 (952) 512-2061 1 www.oasisforyouth.org. Deb Manuen From: Ann Makredes <amakr @msn.com> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: Priority Use Agreement for BCLFSC and EHA Attachments: Press Release- 2014 Midwestern Synchronized Skating Sectional Champions[2].pdf Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland, I thought you would appreciate the enclosed press release. This achievement would not have been possible without your help and support and of course the continued practices from our figure skaters at Braemar Arena. Thank you, Ann From: Ann & Steve Makredes <amakr @msn.com> Date: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 11:03 PM. To: <mail @edinamn.gov> Subject: Priority Use Agreement for BCLFSC and EHA Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland, I was present at last night's council meeting and I just would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for your leadership in this very difficult situation. You clearly had listened to us and had read all the emails we sent you over the last few weeks. Figure skating is a complex sport but I am hopeful that, with the flexibility of Team Braemar being able to purchase some ice elsewhere, the club will be able to remain at Braemar arena. My 14 year old daughter, who was also present yesterday, learned a lot about standing up for your rights, member representation, democracy and strong leadership. Thank you again for your support, Ann Makredes 4916 West Sunnyslope Road Edina, MN 55424 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2014 Midwestern Synchronized Skating Sectional Champions A cause for local celebration, the Edina, Minnesota -based Team Braemar won gold at the 2014 Midwestern Synchronized Skating Sectional Championship held January 22 -25, 2014 in Hoff man Estates, Illinois. "We are incredibly proud of the team and their performances" said head coach, Taylor Walker. "Though our season is far from over and we have quite the February ahead of us, this win reinforces the team's dedication and hours upon hours of practice time. With every competition, we improve upon our last performance. We are looking forward to Italy and representing our country well in competition." The first -place finish primes Team Braemar for their next international tour stop in Milan, Italy February 14 -16 at the 2014 Spring Cup. They are one of only two teams representing the U.S. in the junior division and will compete for the top title against 13 teams from 8 different countries including Croatia, the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Italy, Sweden and Switzerland. It is with great honor and unique distinction that Team Braemar will represent the United States as Team USA for the eighth consecutive year. Upon their return to the U.S., Team Braemar will head straight for Colorado Springs, Colorado February 26 -31 where they will defend their Junior National title in the 2014 U.S. Synchronized Skating Championships, Braemar Ice Arena is located at 7501 Ikola Way in Edina, Minnesota and is the home training center for Team Braemar, as well as the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club (BCLFSC). The facility will play host to the 2015 Midwestern and Pacific Coast Synchronized Skating Sectional Championships January 29 -31, 2015. For more information, go to http:// www. 2015midpacsyrichrosectionals .org. Tryouts for Team Braemar are held each year in April. More information check out: https: / /www.facebook. com /pages/Team- Braemar - Synchronized- Skating. Follow Team Braemar's international travels to Spring Cup 2014 at www.springcup.itl Team Braemar is among the top synchronized skating teams in the U.S. and is consistently ranked in the top tier of synchronized teams internationally. The teams are comprised of female skaters who range in age from 11 to 18 and attend schools throughout the Twin Cities and Greater Minnesota. Coached by Director Taylor Walker and Assistant Coach Jessica Chaffee, Team Braemar is proud to be a part of the Edina -based Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club and practices at Braemar Arena. Additional information can be found at www.braemarfsc.org, www.icenetworl<.com and www.usfigureskating.org. "qq W - cLii" Ell Deb Manaen From: jerryjeh @comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: It's time to make English the official language of our county Jerry Holtzkamp 826 Margaret St. - St. Paul, MN 55106 -4527 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. Polk. County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution. An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Jerry Holtzkamp 651- 774 -5562 i i Deb Manoen From: ttfrancisl @gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:32 AM To: Edina Mail ' Subject: It's time to make English the official language of our county Tadd Francis 16026 Cannon City Blvd Faribault, MN 55021 -7953 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: Polk County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution. I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. Rasmussen Reports found as recently as 2013 that high levels of support for official English have remained unchanged for the past decade. An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. It's time to limit taxpayer- funded translations and encourage English language learning in our county. Please make official English an agenda item for this year. I'll be phoning your office to follow up on this matter. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Tadd Francis 1 Deb Manaen From: rayhite9 @yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:37 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please introduce an official English resolution! Raymond Hite 38328 Grand Avenue North Branch, MN 55056 -5845 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: I just learned that yet another local county has passed a resolution to make English its official language. Polk County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution. Rasmussen Reports found as recently as 2013 that high levels of support for official English have remained unchanged for the past decade. An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. It's time to limit taxpayer- funded translations and encourage English language learning in our county. I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. Please make official English an agenda item for this year. I'll be phoning your office to follow up on this matter. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Raymond Hite 651 - 674 -6128 1 Deb Manaen From: Nici i Vucenich <nvucenich @msn.com> Sent Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:46 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast );joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject Fred Richards My name is Nicole Vucenich and I live at 4604 Gilford Drive. I attended the meeting on Thursday, January 30 to discuss Edina golf operations. I was extremely disappointed from the get -go. There was only one proposal on the table and that proposal began with the completely unfounded conclusion that Fred Richards must be closed. Where were the other proposals to be discussed? None were presented. Nor was any concrete support provided for why Fred Richards must be closed rather "than using some combination of marketing and other efforts to keep this highly regarded neighborhood course open. Most all suggestions made by those in attendance were acknowledged as having not been considered. Nor was anyone able to adequately respond to the question of how the underlying numbers were reached. Suggestions of "funny money" and "questionable accounting tactics" couldn't be responded to. I found this particularly disturbing in light of the comment that in 2012 Fred Richards ended the year with on a positive cash note. Yet it's "pro rata share" of expenses was such that it was technically in the red. I see the reason for the suggestion that there is some questionable accounting going on here. After sitting through the meeting and hearing the overwhelming support by those in attendance for keeping Fred Richards open, I would be extremely disappointed if the one and only proposal put forth so far by the parks board isn't revised to reflect the wishes of the citizens of the city. At a minimum, the board should take us up on our offer to form an ad hoc committee of residents to come up with alternative proposals. Take advantage of our backgrounds and . talents and let's see if we can't come up with an alternative that allows Fred Richards to remain open. A city should be doing all it can to maintain amenities such as this small neighborhood golf course. It is amenities like this that attract people to the city and to individual neighborhoods. Not to mention all those people with homes on the golf course. Are you seriously taking that amenity away despite the impact it would have on their property values? I may not live right on the golf course but I am close enough to feel the impact of such a drastic decision. Moreover, the timing of this is unacceptable. This meeting was held January 30 to discuss "Edina golf operations ". It should have more properly been titled "closing Fred Richards." The decision was already made. You may argue that it has not yet been made; however, when there is only one proposal on the table and that proposal involves closing Fred Richards, there isn't much room for debate. The decision is made. It is just not yet official. It will be made official at the meeting on March 4. That is just over one month from the initial meeting of January 30. How long has the park board and the city been working on this? Why hasn't it been brought to us sooner? Again, this is the city moving forward on its own agenda without regard to the impact on or the wishes of the residents of the city and, more particularly, the residents of the neighborhood impacted most dramatically by this decision. This whole process is a repeat of the "discussion" to add a path from the Parklawn neighborhood to Kellogg Ave. I attended that meeting at city hall as well. It was the first I had heard of the issue. I found out then that the Parklawn residents knew of it a year prior. While the homeowners in my neighborhood didn't find out until about a month before the meeting at city hall where the issue was voted right through despite many voices of opposition in the audience. Apparently providing adequate notice and information to the residents has taken a back seat in recent months. I find this practice completely unacceptable and disrespectful. I hope you're hearing the same from other residents. Give us more time to come up with a proposal that would allow Fred Richards to remain open. As we learned last Thursday, there are many options that have not yet been explored. Let's do that work before making such an extreme decision. Nicole Vucenich Deb Manaen From: Dennis Femkes <fern7313 @scc.net> I Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:51 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: proposed changes to municipal golf operations I am not a golfer, but I think the six -point strategy proposed by the city to the municipal golf operations is a good one. The restaurant idea appeals to me as well. I do not know what the rules are pertaining to the public being able to eat at Braemar, but I would like this to be allowed. Dennis Fernkes 7313 W Shore Drive Edina, MN - Sent from my Wad. 1 Deb Mangen From: gabrielgardner @hotmail.com Sent Tuesday, February 04, 201410:22 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please introduce an official English resolution! Gabriel Gardner 2631 E. Superior St. Duluth, MN 55812 -2351 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: I just learned that yet another local county has passed a resolution to make English its official language. Polk County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution. I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. It's time to limit taxpayer- funded translations and encourage English language learning in our county. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Gabriel J. Gardner 2181234567 i Deb Manaen From: stanrh @mac.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 201410:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: It's time to make English the official language of our county Stan Hildestad 3517 Fectos Road Tower, MN 55790 -8165 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: I just learned that yet another local county has passed a resolution to make English its official language. Polk County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution. I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. Rasmussen Reports found as recently as 2013 that high levels of support for official English have remained unchanged for the past decade. An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. It's time to limit taxpayer- funded translations and encourage English language learning in our county. Please make official English an agenda item for this year. I'll be phoning your office to follow up on this matter. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Let's make America strong and get back to basics, learn english and become an American!!! Sincerely, Stan Hildestad 218- 290 -8886 1 Deb Mangen From: Rodney.K-Vucenich @wellsfargo.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 201411:11 AM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; nvucenich @msn.com; Rodney .K.Vucenich @welIsfargo.com Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Save the Fred- we need more timell I am a long time Edina resident of nearly 30 years and I am very disappointed in how you are handling this situation. It appears that you have already made up your minds and are unwilling to listen to the very people who voted you into your positions! This same behavior was experienced last Fall when you jammed the pathway initiative through in the Cornelia Neighborhood. How can you turn a deaf ear to what you witnessed last week at Braemar? We need more time to come together as a community and weigh our options. It is very apparent that you have an agenda that clearly is in conflict to what the tax payers of Edina want. Is this how politics are run in our city? Rodney Vucenich Senior Financial Advisor Vice President- Investments Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC MAC N9305 -111 go South 7th Street 11th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ph: 612 - 667-3871 Fax: 612 - 316 -4938 rodngy.k.vucenich(@wellsfaLgo.com Sr. Registered Client Associate: Marc Thompson — 612 -667 -9159 — marc.a.thompsonawellsfar og com Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Member SIPC, is a registered broker - dealer and a separate non -bank affiliate of Wells Fargo 8r Investment and insurance products: NOT FDIC - Insured [NO Bank Guarantee [MAYLose Value Ilnsurance products are offered through our affiliated nonbank insurance aaencies. The Information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this email by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance to it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Trade Orders cannot be accepted by e-mail ATTENTION: THIS E -MAIL MAY BE AN ADVERTISEMENT OR SOLICITATION FOR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. To unsubscribef om marketing e- mailsfrom: • An individual Wells Fargo Advisors financial advisor: Reply to one of his /her a -mails and type "Unsubscribe" in the subject line. • Wells Fargo and its affiliates: Unsubscribe at www.wellsfaraoadvisoi:s.com / unsubscribe. Neither of these actions will affect delivery of important service messages regarding your accounts that we may need to send you or preferences you may have previously setfor other e-mail services. For additional information regarding our electronic communication policies, visit htip: / /weUsargoadvisors.com /disclosures /email - disclosure. html. Deb Manuen From: lawreview @mac.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 11:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please introduce an official English resolution! Mike DeMoss Attorney 6950 France Av S Edina, MN 55435 -2008 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Mike DeMoss, Attorney 9529200300 1 Deb Mangen From: nataliehodapp @hotmail.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please introduce an official English resolution! Natalie Hodapp 19398 599 Avenue Mankato, MN 56001 -8498 February 4, 2014 Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina: I just learned that yet another local county has passed a resolution to make English its official language. Polk County, Wisconsin just adopted an official English resolution.' I strongly support this effort of English unity and I urge you to introduce a similar resolution in our county. Rasmussen Reports found as recently as 2013 that high levels of support for official English have remained unchanged for the past decade. An overwhelming 85% of likely voters support official English. It's time to limit taxpayer- funded translations and encourage English language learning in our county. Please make official English an agenda item for this year. I'll be phoning your office to follow up on this matter. Thank you for listening to my concerns. Sincerely, Natalie Hodapp 000 - 000 -0000 1 Deb Manaen From: Mike Welbaum <mwelbaum @comcast.net> Sent Tuesday, February 04, 20141:42 PM To: Edina Mail; Ann Kattreh Cc: Rick Ites; Todd Anderson Subject Proposed changes to municipal golf operations... 1/31/2014 Mayor Hovland, Scott Neal, Ann.Kattreh, City Council and Park Board members, Having moved to Edina for retirement, and from my perspective as a "start-at- retirement" golfer, I submit my reflections on the January 31, 2014 "Proposed Changes" presentation. From my professional experience, the presentation of proposed golf operations revealed an overdue decision as well as several critical issues with this project's planning: • "Improvements at Braemar" are self - justifying, both financially and for competitive operational necessity. The content,of the presentation shows no direct dependency on the recommended changes. The driving range and necessary re- configuration of the executive course should proceed as soon as reasonable, not extending beyond fall of 2014. • The nominal attempts to compare golf operations to other functions exposed a flaw in the Edina City accounting system; the system' prevents adequate cost and operational comparisons between /among various city -run functions including the Ice arena, Edinborough, city parks, athletic fields, and golf operations. • While the introductory material did show a graph of declining "rounds played," the material did not identify elements of causation. Demographics, economy, weather, playing conditions, the status of neighboring golf courses, are just a few that must be reviewed. • The abrupt conclusion — and first chart — "Close Fred Richards" did not include an assessment of consequences to such a step. As a professional with experience with strategic planning, I found the presented material woefully void of alternative solutions to perceived problems. A few considerations that show the lack of depth to the study are: • "Close Fred Richards" without either justification or an impact statement is a mistake. If further, objective investigation arrives at this conclusion, then such a recommendation is defensible. Without such an analysis, this recommendation is not justifiable. • "No golfers will be displaced" — an un- supported and naive conclusion, at best. New, young, casual, and senior players have little interest in hilly terrain and challenging venue. It is unlikely that all of these clients will matriculate to Braemar as assumed. • As a premiere city, Edina's unique asset provides a learning and experience resource that needs more thoughtful consideration than this unsupported — and unsupportable? — recommendation makes. • The removal of a resource for post- retirement activity is especially disconcerting as we endorse the localized development of increased housing density. Similarly, the loss of a municipal resource that currently permits casual introduction to new golfers is shortsighted in light of the stated objective of activity for life and our Vision 20/20 goal to improve the quality of life here. • Consultants from outside the community do not have familiarity with the unique appeal that Edina has. Of special concern, Edina residents include many professionals with significant expertise — and self- interest! These resources would love to provide insight, guidance, and leadership as we develop and protect community investments. Enlist their skills. • The dedication and passion from the "Save the Fred" organization was evident and well - articulated. It is unfortunate that Park Board and Council members were not encouraged to attend the session. Thanks to Mayor Hovland for his attendance; ask him if he thinks these two bodies would.have sensed the community's commitment and passion — and would have learned from the session. A major communication flaw was exposed: By comparison to other City of Edina actions and communications, this meeting, late by any measure (one month for the public to respond after many months of project development in isolation ?), exposed a serious misunderstanding of the plan's importance to the community.. By not including a valid cross - section of perspectives in the planning process, especially considering the obvious misunderstanding of the importance of this decision to the community, the Park Board and City Council might have been confronted with a decision with few options. The recent street repair and improvement communication process should be used as a model for a communications strategy. As I listened to the feedback from the potentially displaced audience, I was struck by how my personal investment in Edina's golf resources has developed. As a newbie to golf and as a recent past president of the Braemar Men's Club, I take umbrage in the potential golf has for the future. To take action without having knowledgeable, invested, and skilled resources involved might have been a miscarriage.of community interest. In summary, I humbly recommend that the listed improvements at Braemar be started as soon as possible. Further, any decision regarding Fred Richards — a non - starter in the funding of Braemar's investment — deserves a considerably more open and thoughtful analysis. To achieve this objective, establish and utilize an advisory panel of Edina expert residents to act as on -going information source. Without such analysis, then I request the Park Board and Council reject the Fred Richards proposal as it currently stands. Thank you for your consideration. Mike Welbaum 7232 Monardo Lane Edina, MN 55435 952 - 920 -5455 Deb Manaen From: AdamsEber @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 2:01 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Golf Enterprise Program Gentlemen I am forwarding my commemts on the above subject as a 39 year golf playing resident. I find the staff recommendation 50% on the mark. 1,Reducing the scope of operations means closing the Fred and repurposing the property, thereby retaining maintenance requirements but eliminating revenue. 2.Investing in Braemar improvements means expanding the driving range and dramatically increasing revenue, as well as upgrading a course that at one time was listed among the top 75 public courses in America, 3. Modifying prices must be earned for a course already among the most costly among local 1st tier courses/ 4,Outsource ancillary services Restaurant profitability is competative,cyclical, and a check of private club facilities should show it to be marginal. 5. Expand marketing Yes 6. Improve customer service has never been an item of concern at any time in my experience/ I submit these comments as a display of a citizens feelings for a report exhibited to interested parties on Jan 30 at Braemar. John Adams 1 Deb Mangen From: Doug Smalley <douglas.smalley @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 3:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards GC Dear Members of the Edina City Council, As a relatively new member.of the Cornelia neighborhood living a few blocks from Fred Richards GC I'm writing to, express my support for the contemplated redevelopment of that property as expanded park space. I'm an avid golfer, actually, but believe residents and families in the area would derive much more year -round & day -to -day benefit from a larger more intentionally managed parkin that location. Not only would we use it heavily (2 kids + dog) but I imagine the families living in the rental/apartment housing nearby would love it too since Arneson Acres isn't really walkable for those of us in this quadrant. I'm not intimately familiar with the financials, but if the course is on the bubble or in the red it seems to me that redevelopment as a park makes great sense. I know if would enhance the quality of life for those of us living nearby. Thank you! H Doug Smalley H Email: douglas.smalley@gmail.com H Mobile: 651- 955 -8899 4412 Fondell Dr, 55435 Moved in December 2012 from St. Paul. Deb Manaen From: cpete572 @gmail.com on behalf of cpete572 <cpete572 @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 6:57 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @ gmail.com Subject: Planning for Braemar's future /Jan. 30 meeting Council members: I attended last week's meeting regarding the future of Braemar golf course. I have been a patron card holder at Braemar since 1979. I have played some 30 rounds a year there. I started the Wednesday night league, constructed and maintained wood duck houses on the course, and did the Audubon certification photography. I care a great deal about the future of Braemar. Braemar is 50 years old and in need of capital improvements. The plans fora new driving range look great and are long overdue. But the new range necessarily eliminates the executive course which I'feel the community needs. I hope the city will reconsider its plans` to close Fred Richards. It provides an executive course which is easy to walk and will continue to serve leagues that want a longer (not par 3) course. It plays an important supportive role to Braemar in helping to develop new players for the future. Tile. city needs an executive course! Revenues from Braemer were used to pay off Fred Richards' $5 million debt. If the Council is seriously considering closing Fred Richards now -- without considering the many marketing opportunities it presents plus quality of life it represents - -then the Council is being shortsighted and, I believe, not fiscally responsible. Braemar is a civic jewel. Fred Richards play a complimentary role. The process of planning for changes to these two civic assets should take into account Edina residents' views, especially golf course patrons'. I appreciate Mayor Hovland's attendance at Thursday's meeting. I hope Council members will give all comments the attention they deserve. Robert K. Peterson, DDS 5620 Doron Drive Edina 55439 952- 944 -0261 Deb Mangen From: Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 201410:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Feedback on planned changes at Fred Richards and Braemar I would like to provide detailed comments on your six month strategy — mostly refinements, rather than disagreeing with the basic things that are being proposed. Close Fred Richard Executive Golf Course. I support this decision, but would like to see a timeline for the public process announced as quickly as possible, because every month the land sits idle wastes a resource and increases.the risk vandalism. While most of the land should be reserved for public use, I would support having a small residential component included in the project — particularly low income housing for those who work in Edina. Also, it is adjacent of the Pentagon Park and by thinking about it soon rather than later, there may be opportunities to get synergies from the two redevelopment projects. One basic amenity absent in Edina is a performing arts center. If good access can be provided (in contrast to the difficult route to Fred Richards), that could be an excellent site for such a center, given that it is hard to see anywhere else in the community that a building with adequate parking could be built. The Edina Art Center would be relocated that in that scenario. 2. Invest in improvements at Braemar. Braemar is now a 27 hole course; which allows three different starting places. This is the time to consider the option of turning Braemar into a golf complex with 36 holes, unless it is totally clear. that is not technically feasible. Fred Richards as a par three course was not successful. Turning the Executive Course into another par 3 course might not be a good idea. I believe that a 36 hole course could strong drawing card for serious golfers — because serious golfers could conceivably do one round in the morning, have lunch and do a second round in the afternoon, not repeating any holes. I just throw that out as an alternative that might not have been considered. 3. Modify prices and discounts. Golf is a wonderful alternative for our youth, particularly those not inclined toward team sports. Edina HS is well known for its athletic excellence, but has not been as competitive in golf as in many other sports in recent years. Although you need to make money, I think that it is very appropriate if there is any subsidy from the city involved, that it is directed toward making golf more accessible to youth and teens. Likewise, it make sense to invest in getting young adults involved in the game, as the average age of golfers has risen over time. The pricing policy should advance broader interests than just making money. Rounds of wealthy adult golfers should not be subsidized, as those golfers have two excellent private clubs in Edina that their incomes allow them to access, but if we can give young people a price break, we should. 4. Outsource ancillary services. In the recent community survey, it appeared that satisfaction with the current Braemar operation is high in the general community — but of course you may have done research on your golfers. that suggests otherwise. Bringing in outside expertise to run the clubhouse and hire and -train staff may be a' response to dissatisfaction among current golfers or approaches being used at more financially successful organizations. If instead, the reason is to lower personal costs and solve administrative headaches, then I'd be a little concerned about displacing loyal employees to save a few payroll dollars. . In many communities, non- golfers eat meals at the golf course. If you have different management of the clubhouse, there might be some new signage at the entrance of the course indicating that the clubhouse grill and store are open to all, with sales and specials also publicized there. S. Expand marketing. It appears that traditional measures to limit adult golf and team sports to those who work and live in Edina are no longer necessary. As participation-levels have gone down, access to service has not been significantly widened to fill the gap. At the same time Park and Rec looks at what percentage of golfers should be allowed to come from outside the community and what level of additional charges those outside participants should pay, it would make "sense to look at the same issue for all its adult sports leagues.. If you allow recruiting of players from outside Edina, within new but looser limits, it will make it easier to form teams. Likewise with golf, if you make it easier for there to be mixed foursomes (Edina and non -Edina residents) more groups of golfers are likely to use their course as their regular destination. If leagues are now limited to Edina golfers, that also could be redefined — although of course, outsiders could be asked to pay more. 6. Improve customer service. Again, there has to be a clear definition of what the customer service problems vendors are going to be expected to solve. Then vendors can be expected to commit to reaching defined customer service targets in order to earn performance bonuses. Finally, I think that it is very premature to promise that the subsidies will end. While I don't think you want to have subsidies to general operations, if there are subsidies for things like youth golf instruction and providing low -cost access to young people with limited financial means, that should remain an option, as the community should be investing in its youth, even if that activity isn't totally covering its expenses. In fact, if it is feasible, the city should consider trying to work out with the school district an arrangement that all Edina students are exposed to golf at Braemar as part of their physical education program (a parallel program could be developed for Edina families with students in other school districts or private schools).. Thanks, Joel Deb Mangen From: John Tronsdal <jatrons @earthlink.net> Sent Wednesday, February 05, 201412:16 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: PLEASE "SAVE the Fred Richards Golf Course" Mayor James Hovland, The timeline proposed to even think about eliminating the "Fred Richards Golf Course" is offensive. The City should develop alternative proposals to keep the "Fred Richards Golf Course ". My family, friends and neighbors have all enjoyed and continue to enjoy playing golf at this local wonderful and enjoyable Golf Course and want this golf course available for future generations of golfers to enjoy. If we need volunteers from the community to help perform tasks at the golf course to help keep costs down, just ask as I believe many people in the community that will be willing to . provide assistance. The "Fred Richards Golf Course" is used and enjoyed by Edina, Bloomington, Richfield and many other surrounding residents. I am currently out of town and unable to attend the meetings being held but want you to know how much the "Fred Richards Golf Course" means to so many residents and even if we are out of town we are taking the time to ensure you know how much the "Fred Richards Golf Course" means to all of us. PLEASE "SAVE the Fred Richards Golf Course." John Tronsdal 8700 Wood Cliff Road Bloomington, MN 55438 Deb Mangen From: halling.bill @gmail.com Sent Wednesday, February 05, 2014 2:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Contact Us form submission Name: bill halling Organization: edina resident Website: Address 1: 5608 interlachen boulevard Address 2: City: edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55436 Email: halling.bill@jzmail.com Phone: 9529294711 Referrer: google Message: Earlier I attended a city led meeting that said Edina golf operations were losing $500,000, however, it was not stated how much was caused by Fred Richards - you should disclose this information - our belief is that it is a mistake to convert Fred Richards into commercial activity - it is a wonderful course and used much - it may not be the highest revenue producing site for the city, but neither are many other city owned properties - we should not be in government to maximize revenues but to satisfy residents and make our city attractive and useful to us - there are certainly other plats that could be developed by commercial interests other than this land. 1 Deb Mangen From: Ron Way <ron- way @comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 5:06 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Council Member Joni Bennett Following our brief meeting at Precinct Caucuses last night, I sent the below to a few folks who are interested in Braemar and golf issues. I have a larger list of guys who strongly favor Braemar improvements, and I'll next send a note to them along the lines as the below. I sent bbc's of this to Ann Kattreh, the Mayor, and selected others. I talked with Ann this afternoon and she gave me the full dose of reality facing Edina's golf enterprise. I have a brief meeting on this with Josh Sprague on Friday morning. Thank you for your time, and your interest. Ron Way 612 - 986 -5158 - - -- Original Message - - - -- from:. Ron Way `. To: Reeves, Chris (MPQ ; michaelgwolff(Mcomcast.net ; icouchman(d_)comcast.net; cpete57 naol.com Cc: R. J. Smiley; Bill Hollway ; Paul Domholt Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Save the Fred - meeting follow -up To Bob Peterson: I'm back in town through tomorrow, and perhaps we can meet up and talk through the matter of Fred Richards. Some thoughts on your notes re Braemar and Fred Richards: While the City Council seems to be quite serious that Edina's "golf enterprise" be self- sustaining, I'd side with you and others who say that in the context of community purpose there should be consideration to the community sharing in underwriting those services. As a comparative example, the Sports Dome will not be self - sustaining and property taxes will be tapped to underwrite some of that impressive cost. But in my view this argument would be futile. It's a sad fact that City surveys show that golf interest rates nowhere near hockey and soccer, and even Centennial Lakes' facilities are vastly more popular than our game. Yes, FR is a quality venue for folks to take up and play the game at a friendly facility. Obviously, FR has a core of devoted followers. Yes, there'd be disruption if FR and Braemar's exec course are closed simultaneously. And while appreciate the oddity that a course whose recently- retired debt is a candidate for closure, it's also true that the new cast at the helm shouldn't be burdened bone - headed decisions of the past. I think a Braemar Par 3 could satisfy any desire by users to hit "longer clubs." Truth is, many golfers (and most beginners) can't hit the ball over 150 yds, and surely some holes in a Par 3 layout would be that long or longer. Besides, agree with the notion that Clunie tees could be adjusted to make that a "long short course" and, even, a 6 -hole facility for the growing many who prefer to spend less time on the course. There are options. To me, a central question is whether Edina's "golf enterprise" is financially sustainable, and I think some pretty good numbers show that it currently is not. Maybe it's weather related, maybe debt - retirement would change that, and maybe better marketing and course conditions and customer service could boost revenue. But maybe also THE KEY factor is diminishing interest in our game. If that's as true as I suspect it is, then it makes sense to examine alternatives to maintaining the "enterprise" in its full and current form. We must avoid a situation where we're stuck with facilities that, together, are not self- sustaining and the City Council loses interest (understandable, given golfs low ranking in city surveys). The real danger here is that trying to maintain "the enterprise" in its full form may well result in funding levels that would reduce all courses to mediocrity. Face it, the condition of Braemar is already diminished from being the state's top public facility to one that is out of the top tier, and that won't change without making adjustments in golf - related service levels. We should examine all options, of course. But to me, "doing nothing" (as in maintaining the politically -safe status quo) almost certainly would mean that Braemar continues to suffer. Thanks, and let's talk this through (I'll buy the first round). Ron 612 - 986 -5158 — Original Message 77. From: cpete572(a)_aol.com To: Chris. Reeves(a)_DexOne.com ; ron- way(ab-comcast.net; michaelgwolff cD- comcast.net ; Icouchman(aD-comcast.net Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 11:56 AM Subject: Re: Save the Fred - meeting follow -up To me a big point is that they are closing both executive courses at the same time. They need a course where some longer clubs can be hit. The Fred is also level and easy to walk! Not good planning considering all the leagues that play at Fred and Braemar Exc. Where are the going to play and how many will continue on a par 3 course? It is a sin to give up on a $5 million dollar investment without more discussion. Thanks, Robert Peterson 35 year patron at Braemar cpete572(cD,aol.com - - - -- Original Message--- - From: Reeves, Chris (MPL) (MPL) <Chris. Reeves @DexOn e.com> To: 'Ron Way <ron- way @comcast.net >; michael wolff <michaelgwolff @comcast.net >; 'Robert Petersen' <cpete572 @aol.com> Sent: Sat, Feb 1, 2014 9:07 am Subject: Fwd: Save the Fred - meeting follow -up FYI Begin forwarded message: From: "chrisandrachel @comcast.net' <chrisandrachel @comcast.net> Date: February 1, 2014 at 8:59:30 AM CST To: Chris Reeves <chris.reeves @dexone.com> Subject: Fwd: Save the Fred - meeting follow -up Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Liz Couchman <jcouch man @comcast. net> Date: February 1, 2014 at 8:12:10 AM CST To: Rachel Reeves <chrisandrachel @comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: Save the Fred - meeting follow -up FYI- here's the lowdown. Begin forwarded message: Dear Friends of The Fred, First, the bad news. Last night, City of Edina Staff led by City Manager Scott Neal, formally announced a 6 point plan to reduce costs and increase revenue for Edina golf operations. Sadly, the very first point in the plan is a recommendation.to close Fred Richards Golf course. Enough of the bad news, now onto the good news! THE GOOD NEWS! • FRIENDS of the FRED TURNED OUT! Of over 300 people at the meeting, approximately 90% were there to support the Fred! • Friends of the Fred handed out 150 neon yellow t -shirts with the phrase "Save the Fred" on the front. We ran out of T- Shirts 10 minutes before the meeting even. started. City Staff were startled to look out and see "a WALL OF YELLOW sitting in front of them. • It was obvious to everyone in the room from the first slide on the screen that the plan being presented was flawed and not well thought out. The City's presentation provided little to no support for their numbers related to the economics of Fred Richards golf course. • Several FOF brought up that repurposing of Fred land would cost money... both in initial capital and in ongoing maintenance costs. When asked about this, the City Manager confirmed that potential future costs of operating and maintaining a park were NOT included in the city's financial analysis that led to the recommendation to close the FRED. • Friends of the Fred spoke passionately for over one hour and fifteen minutes when the meeting was opened to comments. Highlights: o City proposed timeline is for a vote on closing the Fred on March 4 th .... we let them know loud and clear this is unacceptable! They have been working on this with consultants and staff for MONTHS, AND MONTHS, AND MONTHS. o Golfers of all ages have enjoyed Fred Richards for over 20 years and City Staff proposed public consideration of ONE MONTH. That timeline cannot and will not standl o FOF spoke eloquently about years of enjoying rounds on the Fred with children, grandchildren, friends and family. o Fred Richards league members talked about how great the course is and how their leagues are growing (Patty Berg League, Happy Hackers League, Fairway Femmes League, Toro League, Seagate League, NWW League etc.). o Many great questions were asked about the financial assumptions underlying the recommendation. Quite simply, the numbers don't add up and Friends of the Fred in attendance let the City know it. o FOF put forward great ideas about how to generate more revenue at the Fred and across golf operations. When asked whether any of these ideas were even considered by staff when putting together their recommendation the answer was almost always NO. o FOF stressed how talented and resourceful Edina residents are and challenged City Staff to put together an ad hoc team to study other alternatives to increasing golf revenue WITHOUT closing the Fred. • We applaud Mayor Hovland for attending the meeting and listening to our concerns. After the meeting he expressed significant concern over the timeline for making a decision to close the Fred and also remains open to other ideas and proposals. • None of the City Council Members attended the meeting. We sincerely hope they will get involved and take every opportunity to listen to the voice of the citizens that they represent in the near future. What's Next: • Friends of the Fred team will be meeting this weekend to discuss an action plan for next steps .... stay tuned! • Public hearing of the Edina Park Board at City Hall on Tuesday, February 11`h at 7PM. • City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4'h. THREE THINGS YOU CAND, `NOW TQ HELP SA F THE FRED:! 1. THE SUPPORT WE HAD LAST NIGHT WAS TREMENDOUS, BUT. IT'S ONLY THE BEGINNING! WE NEED YOUJO COME TO THE PARK BOARD MEETING ON FEBRUARY.11TH. WE ARE ORDERING MORE "SAVE THE FRED" YELLOW T- SHIRTSI EMAIL jtstang67 @gmajLcom to let us know you will be there to support the FRED. 2. PLO., D. the Mayor and City,gd ncil.Members with emails and letters to express your support for the Fred (See email addresses below). THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION. Tell them the timeline proposed Is offensive and ask for the City to approve an ad hoc.team, of concerned residents to develop alternative proposals for consideration.' 3. Watch your email for more updates from us and visit the FaceBook page for SAVE THE FRED every dayl James Hovland Mayor 612 - 874 -8550 mail @EdinaMN.gov Joni Bennett City Council Member 952 - 927 - 0661... jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Mary Brindle City Council Member 952 - 941 -7746 mbrindle @comcast.net Josh Sprague City Council Member 612 - 501 -0252 joshsprague @edinarealty.com Ann Swenson City Council Member 952 - 927 -7524 swensonannl @gmail.com Deb Mangen From: Aaron C Swann <aaron.c.swann @seagate.com> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 8:33 AM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; Josh Sprague, Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson This note is to communicate my families very strong support of the Fred Richards golf course and the need for it to remain open. The course offers a casual golfing environment that is rare and that would be impossible to replicate at Breamar. I_believe that the proposals so far offered by the city are incomplete and have jumped straight to the answer of closure without considering the full costs or other opportunities to improve the financial status of the golf operations. To me this simply shows a lack of vision or imagination with regard to this issue. In addition, I am very concerned that the quick path to closure is wrapped up with the desire of the Hillcrest Development company to include new parks in their Pentagon Park redevelopment effort. This seems likei something that needs to be further investigated to understand the influence that is being applied here. While I am unable to attend the next parks meeting due to travel, I will continue to strongly support the efforts of those working to save Fred Richards. Regards, Aaron Swann 6710 Cahill Rd Edina, MN 55439 952- 944 -5261 .B Deb Mangen From: Laura Nisi <Inisi @me.com> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:15 AM To: Josh Sprague 6: Jim and LaRae Hovland; Edina Mail; Kurt Nisi Subject: EHS Golf Teams Hi.there Does the city charge the Edina High School golf teams for use of Braemar and /or Fred Richards? If they get a preferred rate and time, are we also extending those preferences to Hopkins or Richfield Public Schools? Would love any links to documentation of policies surrounding this as well. Thank you! Laura Nisi Inisi @mac.com 612.834.4034 1 r Darrell Todd . From: Ruth Schmoll Sent: Friday, January 31, 20141:42 PM To: Darrell Todd Cc: - Pete Knaeble Subject Commendation - Pete Knaeble As I mentioned at Run Review, I received an over-the-top compliment from'a citizen about the care Pete Knaeble provided his 92 -year old mother. Mr. Laine Burger told about the call ( #134093). He was impressed by a_ II Police and Fire responders at the scene, but especially Pete. Mr. Burger said Pete was calming, extremely polite, very competent and reassuring, and had a wonderful personality. He said Pete made an excellent presentation of the current situation. What is interesting is that Mr. Burger's background is in law enforcement, particularly training. He has trained hundreds of people for 38 different agencies in California, Nevada, and parts of the Midwest. He said he has seen public safety staff inaction, and some "get it" and some don't. Mr. Burger said Pete "gets it "I He said Pete "does his job well and he does it correctly". He thought Pete should be applauded for his method and great example. qRuth Schmoll,.Administrative Assistant 952- 826 -03261 Fax 952 - 826 -0393 RSchmoIIAEdinaMN.gov I www.EdlnaMN.gov /Fire To read news about what matters most, read the EFD Pulse'bloq. HOME Can Help With: Indoor Services • Cleaning • Laundry • Errands • Grocery shopping Outdoor Services • Snow shoveling • Lawn mowing • Yard work • Window washing Minor Repairs • Safety device installation • Carpentry • Plumbing • Weatherization Paintin • Interior • Exterior Who Provides the Services? Our network of skilled workers and volunteers provide indoor and outdoor chore services. Workers are pre- screened to ensure that seniors can feel safe and confident about the services they receive. Household &Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (HOME) Senior Community Services mobilizes open - hearted people to bring you affordable home maintenance and chore services; helping you take care of the place you call home. Who Is Eligible to Receive Services? All seniors age 60 and older, regardless of income, living in the following communities: • Bloomington • Brooklyn Center • Brooklyn Park • Crystal • Eden Prairie • Edina ■ Golden Valley ■ Hopkins • Maple Grove • Minnetonka • New Hope • Plymouth • Richfield • Robbinsdale • St. Louis Park • Wayzata How Much Does it Cost? Through our strategic partnerships, HOME is able to offer services on a sliding fee scale that is based on ability to pay. How Do I Get Started? For program details, call us: (952) 746 -4046 Our Vision mini The vision of Senior Community Services is to mobilize the community to Reimagine Aging. We are passionate about enhancing the quality of life of older adults and caregivers. To discover more programs that help enhance the lives of seniors or to get involved through volunteerism, visit: www.seniorcommunity.org Senior ReimagineAging Community = Services 10201 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 335 Minnetonka, MN 55305 scs @seniorcommunity.org HOME is a program of Senior Community Services. Funded, in part, by United Way and the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging. Copyright SCS 2013 Household & Outside Maintenance for the Elderly ' Senior ReimagineAging Community Services