Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-04_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY, MARCH 4, 2014 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of February 18, 2014 and Work Session of February 18, 2014 B. Receive Payment of Claims as per: Pre -List' Dated, 2/20/2014 TOTAL $653,251.31 and per Pre -List Dated, 2/27/2014 TOTAL $437,696.90 C. Emergency Request For Purchase — Premium Efficiency Boiler Lochinvar KBX400, Edinborough Park D. Request For Purchase — Toro 4500 Mower, Braemar Golf Course E. Request For Purchase — Toro 3500 Mower, Braemar Golf Course F. Request For Purchase — Asphalt And Concrete Crushing, Public Works G. Request For Purchase — Aquatic Vegetation Management, Contract No. ENG 14 -2NB H. Waiver Of Trespass/Right Of Entry Agreement For 7101 France Ave., Rue de France 1. On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, and Sunday Sale, Wine And Beer Liquor License Renewals J. Authorize City Council Members To Attend The 2014 Congressional Cities Conference Of The National League Of Cities V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Agenda/Edina City Council March 4, 2014 Page 2 • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING — Subdivision, 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue, Homestead Partners, Resolution No. 2014 -25 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — Golf Course Operations Study - (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment" the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must, limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic Generally speaking items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during. Community Comment Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Ordinance No. 2014 -03 Amending Chapter 2 of Edina Code Regarding Boards and Commissions (First Reading. Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading. Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading. Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) B. Edina Community Health Board Seat — State Community Health Services Advisory Council C. Resolution No. 2014 -26 Accepting Various Donations D. 50th & France Avenue Parking Ramps And Related Streetscape Improvement No. P -23, Resolution No. 2014 -18 (Favorable roll call vote of four Council Members to approve) E. Second Reading: Parking Permit Policy And Fees In 50th & France Commercial District, Ordinance No. 2014 -2 and Parking Time Limits For Municipal Parking Facilities, Resolution No. 2014 -27 (Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass.) F. Appointments To Advisory Boards And Commissions IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Minutes 1. Energy & Environment Commission, January 9, 2014 X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE Agend/Ed aina City Council March 4, 2014 Page 3 XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XIII. ADJOURNMENT EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Meeting of February 18, 2014 V. ENGINEERING SERVICES — Construction Materials Testing Services For France Avenue Improvements VI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need-assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues Mar 4 Work Session —Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. Regional Trail Update /Destination Marketing Organization Tues Mar 4 Regular Meeting Mon Mar 17 Board and Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting Tues Mar 18 Work Session — Bike Edina Task Force /Joint Meeting With ETC COMMUNITY ROOM Pentagon Park Term Sheet Tues Mar 18 Regular Meeting Tues Apr 1 Work Session- Arden Park Watershed District Partnership Utilities Review Tues Apr 1 Regular Meeting Tues Apr 22 Business Meeting/Joint Meeting With Arts & Culture Comm. Tues Apr 22 Regular Meeting Tues May 6 Work Session - 50th & France Special Assessment Policy Tues May 6 Regular Meeting Tues May 20 Work Session —Joint Session With HRRC 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. HUGHES PAVILION CENTENNAL LAKES 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM - Agenda/Edina City Council March 4, 2014 Page 4 Tues May 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 26 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 18, 2014 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. IL ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED . Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of February 3, 2014 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated February 6, 2014, and consisting of 28 pages; General Fund $182,679.18; Police Special Revenue $307.48; Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $2,616.25; Working Capital Fund $7,785.34; Equipment Replacement Fund $40,860.00; Art Center Fund $4,017.89; Golf Dome Fund $3,277.86; Aquatic Center'Fund $1,224.00; Golf Course Fund $1,425.20; Ice Arena Fund $13,356.59; Sports Dome Fund $2,175.00; Edinborough Park Fund $10,119.21; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,286.05; Liquor Fund $173,596.84; Utility Fund $383,561.60; Storm Sewer Fund $51,688.40; PSTF Agency Fund $6;150.63; Centennial TIF District $65,438.40; Grandview TIF District $2,578.18; Southdale 2 District $1,790.75; Payroll Fund $6,100.15; TOTAL $966.035:00 and for receipt of payment of claims dated February 13, 2014, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund ,$228,701.27; Police Special Revenue $396.00; PIR Debt Service Fund $2,390.00; Working Capital Fund $53,529.97; Art Center Fund $451.31; Golf Dome Fund $18,242.15; Aquatic Center Fund $385.00; Golf Course Fund $3,746.77; Ice Arena Fund $40,085.12; Edinborough Park Fund $2,303.79; Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,198.00; Liquor Fund $211,045.06; Utility Fund $79,782.61; Storm Sewer Fund $825.57; Recycling Fund $35,190.09; PSTF Agency Fund $5,051.52; Centennial TIF District $5,000.00; Payroll Fund $3,858.38; TOTAL $696.182.61. IV.C. Accept Traffic Safety Report, January 2, 2014 IV.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2014 -13 Requesting Variance from Standards for State Aid Operation for West 54th Street from Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue IV.E. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -3 Bredesen Park D & Countryside F Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Palda & Sons, Inc. at $1,770,081.20 IV.F. Request for Purchase, Award of Bid, Contract ENG 14 -5 Strauchauer Park B Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, McNamara Contracting, Inc. at $1,109,412.05 IV.G. Request for Purchase, Six 2013 Ford PI Utility Vehicles, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Nelson Auto Center at $167,876.92 IV.H. Approve August 5, 2013 City Council Minutes Correction IV.I. Approve Temporary 3.2 Beer License Our Lady of Grace Church IV.J. Approve 2014 -2015 Bargaining Unit Contract for Police Officers Rollcall: Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. GREGORY BANKO AND JASON DOCKTER, SOUTH VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL, 4' ANNUAL TASTE OF SOUTH VIEW CULTURAL CELEBRATION —ANNOUNCED Jason Dockter, Assistant Principal of South View Middle School, and three ninth -grade students announced the March 13, 2014, 4th 'Annual Taste of South View Cultural Celebration. The students described its purpose, scheduled events, and extended an invitation for all to attend. V. B. TOM SCHMITZ, EDINA FIRE CHIEF —INTRODUCED, Manager Neal introduced newly hired Fire ' Chief Tom Schmitz. Fire Chief Schmitz described his professional experience and stated he was happy to be back in Edina and, looking forward to working with the community and staff. V.C. - SPEAK UP EDINA MONTHLY REPORT,. - PRESENTED Communications Coordinator Gilgenbach presented a summary of opinions, both pros and cons, collected through Speak Up, Edina relating to allowing food trucks with some restrictions. The Council asked questions of Mr. Gilgenbach and suggested the survey ask if the responder was an Edina resident so those comments could be differentiated .from vendor and /or non - resident comments. Manager Neal noted it was a key Council goal to engage with the community to create civic engagement infrastructure. Speak Up Edina was part of that initiative. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD— Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. 2014 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT — RESOLUTION NO. 2014-22 ADOPTED Senior Planner Presentation Senior Planner Repya described the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program and recommended allocation of Edina's 2014 allotment of $124,671 as follows: Public Services- Senior Community Services (H.O.M.E- Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly) of $10,095; Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) of $5,000; and, HomeLine $3,605 (equaling $18,700 or 15% of total); and, Community Development- Rehabilitation of Private Property Program of $50,000; West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT) for its Homes Within Reach Program of $55,971 (equaling $105,971 or 85% of total). Ms. Repya answered questions of the Council related to the history of CDBG funding and why the amount received was substantially lower than received in 2010. Member Brindle disclosed that she served on the CAPSH Board of Directors. Attorney Knesch advised that would not present a legal conflict; however, Ms. Brindle was free to abstain if she desired. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:36 p.m. Public Testimony Deb Taylor, HOME Senior Community Services Program CEO,.described changes that had taken place with the Senior Community Services Program and the Household and Outside Maintenance for the Elderly (H.O.M.E.) program. She explained how HOME leveraged CDBG funding to receive additional funds and the types of services being requested. The Council encouraged Ms. Taylor to contact the Edina Chamber to learn more about AARP's Life Re- Imagined pilot program., Dan Park, Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) Housing Counselor, reported on the services provided to 22 Edina households in 2013. Page 2 Minutes /Edina Citv Councii/February 18. 2014 r, 1" Samuel Spade, Housing Attorney with Homel.ine, summarized the tenant advocacy services provided and thanked the Council for its continued support. He advised that the most common topics were evictions, repairs, and security deposits. Janet Lindbo, Executive Director of the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (WHAHLT), described the services provided by Homes within Reach to purchase, rehab, and resell homes while maintaining ownership of,the property. She thanked the City for its continued support and advised of their fundraising efforts and outreach to the private market for funding: Ms. Lindbo indicated WHAHLT had seen an increase of 1216% in home purchase prices due to greater demand and lower supply. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:49 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -22, Approving Proposed Use of 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program Funds and Authorizing Execution of Subrecipient Agreement with Hennepin County and any Third Party Agreements. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Aye's:.,Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion"carried. VI. B. 50TH & FRANCE AVENUE PARKING AND WAYF/NDING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 — RESOLUTION NO. 2014-18 Mayor Hovland explained that the Council would receive staff and consultant presentations, call for public testimony, then the Council meeting would be recessed and the HRA called to order. Economic Development Manager Presentation Economic Development Manager Neuendorf thanked stakeholders who had participated during the process of evaluating parking at 50`h and France Avenue for their contributions. Mr. Neuendorf presented findings of the feasibility study contemplating the repair and maintenance costs as well as future annual maintenance and operational costs that would be.borne by the property owners and funded through special assessments. It was noted the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) would fund the capital improvements to the City -owned ramps. Mr. Neuendorf stated if approved, a special assessment public hearing would be scheduled in the fall of 2014. Dan Coyle, Kimley -Horn Associates, provided a slide presentation that described the substantial public involvement process; the proposed improvements totaling $5,685,000; annual costs totaling $450,000 for operations and maintenance; sources of funds to finance the project totaling $3,310,000 of assessments and $2,375,000 of City funds; financing of annual maintenance improvements totaling $350,000 of assessments and $100,000 of parking permit revenue; assumptions related to funding sources; proposed parking policy changes to address the greater demand for employee parking stalls; and, project schedule that would minimize impacts to business. Mr. Coyle stated future projects for discussion would be a parking ramp expansion of 140 to 200 stalls and middle ramp elevator. Mr. Coyle answered questions of the Council relating to recommended changes to the City's Parking Policy and indicated the parking demand for shoppers was currently being met. Mr. Neuendorf explained the change in enforcement practices to address employee parking in non - employee designated spaces and to Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 impel them to park in less desirable locations including the north-ramp. He stated the feasibility study also addressed enticements for employees to use of other travel modes, which should improve the situation. With regard to employee parking in the south ramp, Mr. Neuendorf stated employee designated spaces were on the roof (90 stalls) and the upper most covered level (20 stalls). Employee parking was not allowed on the second or street levels. He explained it was not possible, to make the lowest level handicapped accessible because it had no elevator service. Mr. Coyle stated changes to the ramps would be: lowest level of the south ramp would be permit stalls; second and third levels would go from five hour parking to five hour and employee parking in the middle ramp; and the lowest,level "of the 'north ramp would go from two hour parking to five hour parking and permit. Mr. Coyle clarified that customer stalls would not be displaced. The Council voiced concern that the recommendation would use one -half of the south ramp's 415 stalls for employees and would not take advantage of a low cost solution that had been under discussion for years S to dedicate the most heavily used and best located ramp to higher volume businesses for customer parking and to shift employee parking to less1heavily used,ramps. Mr. Coyle stated there were about 1,000 total parking stalls between the three ramps and business owners have indicated the need was approaching 750 employee stalls at peak time, leaving 250 customer stalls. He stated the north ramp was already, essentially,-an employee ramp. Mr. Coyle explained that employee spaces have been divided between the three parking ramps based on the location of Edina employers. Mr. Neuendorf described the detailed analysis conducted by Kimley -Horn relating to employee numbers. Manager Neal stated _Mr. Coyle was hired to provide a professional analysis but it was the,.Council's decision in how the parking ramps should be used. He encouraged the Council to offer suggestions so those options could be analyzed and feedback provided. The Council suggested relocating the 50th and Halifax sign to the west side of Halifax. With regard to concern that pavers might present a tripping hazard, Mr. Coyle stated the 50th and France District currently had pavers and the design of pavers had changed to be more durable, resistant to salt, and permeable. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:36 p.m. Public Testimony Richard Steele, 5057 Ewing Avenue South, Minneapolis, addressed the Council. Dick Curtin, 6310 McIntyre Point, addressed the Council. Scott Sundet, 7113 Lanham Lane, addressed the Council. Alan Ackerberg, 4200 Forest Road, St. Louis Park, representing the Parasole Group, addressed the Council. Klaus Freyinger, 510 Groveland Avenue, Minneapolis, managing partner and owner of the Paper Source corner, addressed the Council. Rachel Thelemann, 50th and France Business & Professional Association Executive Director, addressed the Council. Gene Haugland, 5229 West Highway Drive, owner of property at 50th and France, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a.motion, seconded by Member Brindle to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Mayor Hovland reviewed the unsuccessful efforts of Edina to work with the City of Minneapolis to establish a Special Services District and thanked the Committee for working diligently with Edina to address this important issue. RECESS AND RECONVENE Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle to recess the Council meeting to HRA at 8:55 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to reconvene the Council meeting at 9:05 P.M. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AGENDA AMENDMENT — APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to consider Item VIII.G. Parking Permit Policy and Fees in 50th and France Commercial District, Ordinance No. 2014 -21 prior to taking action on Item VI.B., 50th and France Avenue Parking and Wayfinding Improvement No. P -23, Resolution No. 2014 -18. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.G. PARKING PERMIT POLICY AND FEES IN SOT" & FRANCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT,. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -2 — GRANTED FIRST READING Mr. Neuendorf noted there were more employees at the maximum shift than designated employee parking stalls, forcing employees to park in a non - designated spaces including spaces designated for customers. In addition, employees prefer to park in the middle ramp, even though it was prohibited, creating another enforcement issue. He indicated this recommendation was the first step in an iterative process with adjustments to be made as necessary. The Council agreed with the need to take action to encourage compliance and noted that the Council sets parking fees and the City Manager had the authority to set the location of employee parking. Following discussion, Member Sprague made a motion to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2014 -2 Amending Code Section 2 -274. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion failed. Member Sprague made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2014 -2 Amending Code Section 2 -274. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion carried. Staff was asked to revisit the concerns expressed by the Council with the 50th and France Parking Committee prior to second reading of Ordinance No. 2014 -2. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — continued— Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 VI.B. Se & FRANCE AVENUE PARKING AND. WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -23 — continued — RESOLUTION NO. 2014-18 — POSTPONED;TOMARCH 4, 3024 Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -18, Ordering Improvement No. P -23, Soth and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council encouraged staff to find a method to control weeds without the,-use of toxins. Mr. Coyle answered questions related to landscaping. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle,,Sprague, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion failed. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to reconsider Resolution No. 2014 -18, Ordering Improvement No. P -23, 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Improvements; at the March 4, 2014, Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett; Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland . Motion carried. . Mayor Hovland,recessed the meeting at 9:33 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:43 p.m. VI.C. MODIFYING SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ESTABLISHING PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN — RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -23 — ADOPTED Financial Advisor Presentation Mark Ruff, Financial Advisor with Ehlers & Associates, provided an. overview relating to why a new TIF District was being proposed, a description of the potential projects estimated at a $500,000,000 total project cost, and four required findings. It was noted that at least 50% of the buildings in the Pentagon office park were outdated /substandard, resulting in declining taxable value. He advised the consultants had determined the proposed District would satisfy the requirements for creation of a 26 -year TIF Redevelopment District that would allow the City to consider -a public /private partnership in the future so the full potential of this important business /mixed use district could be realized. Mr. Ruff answered questions of the Council relating to the impact should only one -half of the project be built by the end of 26 years. He explained what was meant by a pay -as- you -go note within the realm of public finance, whereby the developer accepts the risks and would be rebated as taxes were paid. It was noted that general obligation debt.was not being requested as part of this project. The Council considered the potential benefit to surrounding properties. Mr. Neuendorf advised of interest expressed by a property owner to the south to be part of a TIF District, potentially as another phase. Mr. Ruff explained the provision to add additional parcels within five Years if the buildings met the 50% substandard test. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:03 p.m. Public Testimony Mark Schoening, 4608 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. Tom Fletcher, owner of Fletcher. Apartments at 4445 West 77th Street, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 The Council asked questions of Mr. Ruff about expanding the TIF District to include properties on the south side of West 77th Street. Mr. Ruff stated it was at the Council's discretion but he would recommend not interrupting this process to add a parcel as additional review and financial analysis would.be required to determine if it met statutory requirements. That action would also require another public hearing. Mr. Neuendorf stated staff met with Mr. Fletcher but after discussion with legal counsel' and financial consultants, it was determined that adding a parcel at this time-would further complicate the action under consideration. Memlier.Swenson introduced and moved adoptionof'Resolution No. 2014 -23, Adopting a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area; and Establishing the Pentagon Park Tax Increment'Financing District Therein and Adopting a ,Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council encouraged staff to keep the lines of communication open with nearby property owners to determine whether additional properties would meet the TIF District test. RECESS AND RECONVENE Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to recess the Council meeting to HRA' at 10:16 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to reconvene the Council meeting at 10:18 P.M. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vll. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. VIII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS - continued VIII.A. CITY OF EDINA AND EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOL PARTNERSHIP GOALS —APPROVED Manager Neal described the partnership between the City of Edina and Edina Public Schools and presented joint operational goals developed for 2014. He stated both were also actively working on Active Routes to Schools so that would be added to the list. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the 2014 Commitment to Partnership Goals by and between the City of Edina and Edina Public Schools as amended to add S. Active Routes to Schools. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. NEW ON -SALE WINE & BEER ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES, RED SAVOY — APPROVED Clerk Mangen presented the request of Savoy Edina LLC, dba Red Savoy for a new On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Licenses and staff's recommendation for approval. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving new On -Sale Wine and 3.2 Beer Licenses to Savoy Edina LLC, dba Red's Savoy at 4960 and 4970 West 77th Street for the period beginning February 18, 2014 and ending March 31, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 7. Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Michael Mergens and Michael Meents, two of owners of Red's Savoy, introduced themselves, described their pizza offerings, and invited all to enjoy their lunch buffet. VIII.C. SPORTS DOME, OUTDOOR RINK AND ARENA IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET ESTIMATE UPDATE AND BID AUTHORIZATION — APPROVED Parks & Recreation Director Kattreh displayed renderings of the site and, described the location of proposed buildings and drive aisles and access. points. She .presented the construction, budget estimates dated October, 2013 and February. 2014' noting the estimates were close with the exception of the East Arena Ice Equipment ($1,120,000 to $1,770,293) and site work ( +$1,746,507). Th.is.'resu;lted in a project difference of $2,066,817 based on the design /development process being complete,and 600 of the design documents'. being complete. Ms. Kattreh stated this estimate does include $500,000 proposed as an alternate for a Kevlar dome covering, dome insulation, and new soccer fields at the Arena site. The Council considered options to mitigate the $2 million overrun that resulted from site conditions. Ms. Kattreh .stated the Pamela Park project appeared to be about $500,000 under the projected budget. This savings would be gained by creating a high quality grass field rather than a sand /peat field and to slightly expand the width (20 -25 feet) of the artificial turf field. The Council raised.the option of deferring Capital Improvement Projects (CIP). Ms. Kattreh stated that was an option for the Edinborough locker room project and would save approximately $500,000. She explained that while not a contractual obligation, the Edina Swim Club was expecting that work to be completed this year. Another option was to eliminate the outdoor refrigerated rink to save approximately $1.5 million. In response to the Council's questions, Ms. Kattreh stated this project was not in the CIP at this. time and bonds had not been sold or a levy established to pay for these improvements. The Council expressed a reluctance to delaying locker room improvements and asked Ms. Kattreh to provide a recommendation on other options for cost savings. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, authorizing advertisement of bid package one for Sports Dome, outdoor rink, and arena project. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. Member Swenson was excused from the meeting at 10:40 p.m. VIII.D. FINAL PLAT, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND PRESERVATION EASEMENTS — ACRES DUBOIS, FRANK SIDELL, PROPERTY LOCATED BETWEEN LITTLE STREET AND MORNINGSIDE ROAD, RESOLUTION NO. 2014-20 — ADOPTED Community Development Director Teague presented the final plat, development contract, and preservation easements (tree and slope preservation easement) for Acres Dubois. He advised the final plat was consistent with the approved preliminary plat and drainage and utility easements had been expanded to accommodate an updated stormwater management system that would include an underground infiltration system that could infiltrate all storms up to the 100 -year event. The Council noted that Lots 5, 6, 7 and part of 8 were part of the Slope and Tree Preservation Easement and the number of trees to be preserved was reduced from 50 to 10. Mr. Teague indicated that was correct. With regard to the Morningside sidewalk, he explained it :would be subject to the same construction rules and if damaged, would have to be replaced by the new property owner. City Engineer Millner suggested adding that requirement to the Development Agreement., Peter Snaeble, Terra Engineering, Inc., stated the grading plan remained the same as.when approved and was subject to the final house plan. Mr. Teague explained the general grading plan would be done as part of the road construction and the Engineering Department would review grading for individual sites. Mr. Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18, 2014 Snaeble stated the easement would be recorded against the property so grading was not allowed within that easement. If the lot was not encumbered by the slope easement, grading would be allowed. Frank Sidell, property owner, explained that after inspection, the number of trees to be preserved was lowered based on the relative health of the tree stock. The focus was to' protect trees on the slope and an aggressive replacement strategy was included in case a tree had *to be' removed. Mr. Sidell stated his intent to. involve the City Forester to select a tree species should a tiee.be'xeplaced. At the request of the Council, he described the stormwater management system that included, an infiltration tank under the newly constructed road to contain all drainage on site. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of ResolutiowNo. 2014 -20, Approving a Final Plat for'Acres`D`ubois, subject`to the following conditions: 1. Park dedication fee of $10,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the District's requirements. b. Individual homes must comply with the overall grading plan for the site. Each individual building permit will be reviewed for compliance with.the overall grading plan subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. A construction management plan will be required for the overall development of the site, and for each individual home construction. d. Utility hook -ups are subject to review of the City Engineer. e. Outlot A shall be deeded to the adjacent parcel at 4408 Morningside Road. f. The applicant must rebuild the driveway at 4408 Morningside Road to access off the new street, and eliminate the curb cut on Morningside Road." The configuration shall be subject to approval of the Director of Engineering. g. Use of Lot 7 for the overall grading of the development will require compensation to the City of Edina. A restoration plan shall be submitted by the applicant subject to review and approval by the City Council. And to also approve the Development Contract and Tree and Slope Preservation Easement. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.E. SOUTHDALE MEDICAL BUILDING, 6525 FRANCE AVENUE — AMEND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BUILD THE PROOF -OF- PARKING PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -21— ADOPTED Mr. Teague presented an amendment to the approved plans for the addition to the Southdale Medical Office Building to build the proof of parking plan (fifth level) and not build the underground parking level; and, to extend the second, third, and fourth levels of the office building over the loading dock area. If approved, the footprint of the ramp would remain the same, the number of proof -of- parking stalls would still exceed City Code, the square footage of the building would remain the same, and building materials would be repositioned but remain the same. James O'Shay, Collaborative Design Group representing Southdale Medical, provided a slide presentation depicting the exterior building fagade as previously approved and the requested revision that resulted in creating a plaza between the two buildings. He stated the finishes had not changed and the building remained well within setbacks. Mr. O'Shay reviewed parking statistics, noting there would be 17 more parking spaces than required. The Council stated support for the proposed revision that would bring the building into scale but indicated there was need for additional screening or decorative skin on the parking ramp facing Drew Avenue. Mr. O'Shay stated impact was added to the 66th Avenue side based on Council comment and to make a pedestrian connection at the point of entry. In addition, the glass element at the corner of the parking lot reflected the glass corner of the office building. Mr. O'Shay stated if treatment was added along Drew Page 9 Minutes /Edina City Council /February 18,2014 Avenue, a metal mesh or perforated metal panel would probably be used so it was consistent with the other elevations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -21, Approving Plan Revisions for a Site Plan with Variances at 6525 -45 France Avenue to Build a 60,000 Square Foot Addition and Parking Ramp Expansion for the Southdale Medical Office Campus as amended to add select screening panels along Drew Avenue subject to approval by the Community Development, Director. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. F. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-19 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in. order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2014 -19 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.G. PARKING PERMIT POLICY AND FEES IN 5om & FRANCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -2 This item was considered after Item VI.B. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES: 1. ART &. CULTURE COMMISSION, DECEMBER 19, 2013 2. PARK BOARD MINUTES, JANUARY 14, 2014 3. HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, JANUARY 14, 2014 4. PLANNING COMMISSION, JANUARY 8 AND JANUARY 22, 2014 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE— Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Xll. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A: Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 4, 2014. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the February 18, 2014, meeting available. Page 10 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 18, 2014 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:40 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Mayor Hovland. Member Swenson entered the meeting at 6:00 p.m. Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Technology Services Director; Annie Coyle, City Manager Fellow; Susan Faust, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation; Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator; Ann Kattreh, Director of Parks and Recreation; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; and Scott Neal, City Manager. Park Board Members attending: Cathy Cella, David Deeds, Dan Gieseke, Sue Jacobson, Ellen Jones, Louise Segretto, and Keya Steel. NAMING AND DONATION POLICY Manager Neal said a working group has been working on the Naming and Dedication of City Facilities and Donations proposed policies since April of 2012. He noted after an initial presentation to the City Council the working group reconvened and were ready to present their latest version of the two policies. Park Director Kattreh thanked Park Board Member Ellen Jones for leading the working group. Ms. Jones and Steel presented the two proposed policies. The Council and Park Board discussed various aspects of the , two proposed policies. Draft policies will be presented to the Council for consideration. 2014 PARK BOARD WORK PLAN PRIORITIZATION & PARK MASTER PLAN INPUT The Council and Park Board reviewed their 2014 Work Plan. Discussion of the importance of strategic planning with comprehensive needs assessment pointed out the Council's desire for this critical 2014 Initiative. The Council thanked the Park Board for the work done and encouraged them to continue working diligently on the 2014 Work Plan. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, March 4, 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 -- 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380121 212012014 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 3,464.60 DOOR REPAIRS 335898 21402051 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,464.60 380122 212012014 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 80.02 EMERGENCY STOP SWITCH 00005975 335527 0138761 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 834.34 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 335636 0138756 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 914.36 380123 212012014 133633 AFTAHI, DARREN 143.93 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335746 5725 EWING AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 143.93 380124 212012014 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 693.85 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00001545 335528 126972 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 144.30 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335637 126968 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 386.14 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335638 126971 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 700.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335638 126971 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335638 126971 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335638 126971 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 700.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335638 126971 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 228.15 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 335899 126969 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,252.44 380125 2/2012014 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 71.20 ANTIFREEZE 00005935 335639 AFS- 240420017 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.20 380126 212012014 101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK 199.22 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335529 021114 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 199.22 380127 212012014 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 959.85 COPIER PAPER 335640 10388673 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 959.85 380128 212012014 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 110.65 RADIO REPAIRS 335749 43261 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 107.00 RADIO REPAIRS 335750 43260 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 217.65 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary i 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380129 2/2012014 102171 ANDERSON -JOHNSON ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 28,151.60 PAMELA PARK SITE DESIGN 335748 131090114 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 28,151.60 380130 212012014 133632 ANDERSON KM BUILDERS 353.45 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 335747 021314 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER 353.45 380131 2/2012014 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 441.82 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335530 2062278 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 270.98 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335531 2063762 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 624.87 335532 2066476 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 86.32 335532 2066476 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 628.23 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335751 2067964 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD. 2,052.22 380132 212012014 118491 APPLE INC. 628.00 IPAD 00004304 335533 4274226834 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 628.00 380133 212012014 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 366.16 COFFEE 335534 1109707 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.22 COFFEE 335752 9977587 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 466.38 380134 2/2012014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,755.00 335684 41481 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 745.00 335685 "41482 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 140.00 335686 41483 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 59.95 335687 41479 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 683.00 335688 41480 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,382.95 380135 212012014 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES 339.00 2014 DUES 335753 38781 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES" 339.00 380136 2120/2014 126019 B & B PRODUCTS/ RIGS AND SQUADS 75.00 SQUAD LAPTOP MAINTENANCE 335535 4049 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 75.00 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page- 2 Business Unit PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF . "UTILITY REVENUES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GRILL GRILL CENTENNIALLAKES OPERATING COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES, GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PUBLIC HEALTH POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 5862.5513 Council Check Register by GL 5862.5515 Council Check Register and Summary 5822.5515 2/20/2014 - 2/2012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380137 2/2012014 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 1,509.80 56.16 BATTERIES 00003031 335536 018- 328940 1400.6406 31.20 BATTERIES 00001557 335952 018- 328457 1325.6531 5913.6530 5101.4607 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES SIGNS & POSTS REPAIR PARTS CLASS REGISTRATION 5842.5515 87.36 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5515 380138 212012014 5822.5515 124494 BECC CORP 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 1,509.80 LEVELTRANSDUCER 00001394 335537 1846 5520.5510 1,509.80 OF GOODS SOLD 380139 212012014 133636 BEIER, BETTY 79.00 CLASS REFUND 335754 021114 79.00 380140 2/2012014 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 148.05 335689 89733700 82.00 335816 41822500 20.50 335817 41718800 77.35 335818 89764200 129.55 335819 41822400 1,576.15 335820 41822000 2,033.60 380141 212012014 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 835.00 SNOW REMOVAL 335960 142153 835.00 380142 212012014 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 288.00 PIZZA 335538 D28IN1704 252.00 PIZZA 335539 D28IN1691 360.00 PIZZA 335540 D28IN1705 216.00 PIZZA 335900 D28IN1736 1,116.00 380143 212012014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 168.35 COFFEE 335755 1152258 168.35 380144 212012014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 59.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335541 OE- 346056 -1 43.63 PENS, CALENDARS 335542 WO- 909233 -1 26.24 MAILING LABELS 335543 WO- 904552 -1 5913.6530 5101.4607 Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERAL SUPPLIES SIGNS & POSTS REPAIR PARTS CLASS REGISTRATION 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page- 3 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER REVENUES YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA CONCESSIONS ' EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS CENT SVC PW BUILDING SENIOR CITIZENS VERNON SELLING ASSESSING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380144 212012014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS Continued... 49.15 LABELS 335544 WO- 904554 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 41.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003033 335545 WO- 911993 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.30 SIGNATURE STAMPS 335546 IN -27800 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 115.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335547 WO- 906044 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 53.98- CREDIT 335548 CP- WO- 907315 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.98 LABELING TAPE 335549 OE- 344141 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8.79 PREMIUM CERTIFICATE 00003022 335550 WO- 907319 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.75 CUSTOM STAMPS 335551 IN -27827 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 91.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003026 335552 WO- 909011 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 371.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003022 335553 WO- 907315 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 491.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335554 WO- 905787 -1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 24.54 STORAGE BOXES, FILE TABS 335555 OE- 343986 -1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 12.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335756 WO- 912696 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 28.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335756 WO- 912696 -1 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 76.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335756 WO- 912696 -1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 1,562.81 380146 212012014 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC. 348.00 LOCK REPAIRS 00001549 335556 S85396 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES " .. 348.00 380146 212012014 133642 BLUE SKY MECHANICAL 20.20 PERMIT REFUND 335901 ED128678 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 20.20 380147 212012014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 43.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335757 94435 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4.78 CALENDAR 335758 94535 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 24.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 335759 94648 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 72.78 380148 2120/2014 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 212.76 BANDAGES 335557 81330001 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 212.76 380149 2120/2014 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 374.00 335690 118056 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 180.00 335821 118025 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 554.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 YORK FIRE STATION HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT HEAT Council Check Register by GL HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Council Check Register and Summary 2120/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380150 212012014 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 20.75 LENSES 00005920 335558 _ 617645 1553.6530 13716 FILTERS 335559'-814114 1553.6530 208.25. CONCESSION PRODUCT 00005006 335641 824461 1553.6530 366.76 380151 212012014 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335902 33383 5822.6575 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335902 33383 5842.6575 164.00 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 335902 33383 5862.6575 492.00 380152 212012014 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 10,095.13 LEGAL FEES 335760 013114 1195.6131 10,095.13 380153 212012014 119455 'CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 9,404.90 335691 433466 5842.5514 611.25 335692 433464 5822.5514 10,016.15 380154 2/2012014 100677 CARGILL INC. 2,876.21 ROAD SALT 00005070 335903 2901583157 1318.6525 2,676.21 380155 212012014 129923 CAWLEY 68.93 NAME BADGES 335560 V204828 1500.6103 68.93 380166 212012014 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 314.54 BATTERY PACK FOR FIRE 00004303 335561 JN50712 1470.6510 314.54 380157 2/2012014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 804.22 335904 020414 1481.6186 1,311.04 335904 020414 1552.6186 4,515.78 335904 020414 1646.6186 2,479.05 335904 020414 ` 1628.6186 1,449.77 335904 020414 5111.6186 1,983.67 335904 020414 5420.6186 557.97 335904 020414 5422.6186 Subledger Account Description Continued... REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING, VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL HEAT YORK FIRE STATION HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT HEAT CLUB HOUSE HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380157 2120/2014 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 189.96 335904 020414 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 9,938.26 335904 020414 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,330.11 335904 020414 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 428.97 335904 020414 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 713.16 335904 020414 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 528.19 335904 020414 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 3,515.59 335904 020414 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 1,336.28 .335904 020414 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 1,355.66 335904 020414 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 33,437.68 380158 212012014 123898 CENTURYLINK 194.02 612 E01 -0426 335562 0426 -2/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 177.52 612 E12 -6797 335563 6797 -2/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 37.96 952 835 -1161 335564 1161 -2114 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 73.14 952 835 -6661 335565 6661 -2114 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 85.81 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 170.65 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1114 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.79 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 280.76 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1114 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 122.33 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 143.70 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 57.16 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 37.24 612 Z28 -0146 335566 0146 -1/14 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 98.93 612 E77 -0056 335642 0056 -2/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 104.93 612 E23-0652 335761 0652 -2/14 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 55.09 952 285 -2951 335905 2951 -2/14 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,699.03 380159 2120/2014 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 296.00 CLEANER, DEODERIZER 335567 517861 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 160.00 STAINLESS STEEL WIPES 335966 517864 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 456.00 380160 212012014 122084 CITY.OF EDINA - UTILITIES 4,889.80 00103426- 0345052006 335568 345052006 -2114 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 483.23 00113607 - 0342163045 335762 342163045 -2114 -. 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 447.98 00105263 - 0335037016 335763 335037016 -2/14 5430.6189 SEWER & WATER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,821.01 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2119/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 -- 2/2012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380161 212012014 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD Continued... 1,680.00 JAN 2014 INSPECTION SERVICES 335907 2114 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 1,680.00 :380162 2120/2014 124829 - CLARY BUSINESS MACHINES CO. 147.00 SHRED BAGS 335643 36770 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 147.00 380163 212012014 100692 COCA -COLA REFRESHMENTS 305.12 335822 0108119213 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 305.12 380164 212012014 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 329.00 HOT COCOA 335644 0742023 -IN 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 329.00 380165 212012014 120433 COMCAST 70.61 6772 10 614 0419858 335908 419858 -2/14 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 70.61 380166 2120/2014 133173 CRABTREE COMPANIES INC. 6,743.38 SCANNERS 335569 122427 4418.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ELECTRONIC RECORDS MANAGEMENI 6,743.38 380167 212012014 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 217.40 114 - 10014090 -3 335570 013114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.48 114 - 09855685 -4 335764 1/2014 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 237.88 380168 212012014 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 740.08 FEB 2014 NEWSLETTER 335571 296322 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 740.08 380169 212012014 127913 CUTTER SALES 64.55 BOLTS 00005933 335645 92736 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.55 380170 212012014 104020 DALCO 1,878.14 ICE MELT 00001500 335953 2701615 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,878.14 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380171 212012014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. Continued... 936.55 335693 738974 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 137.60 335694 738973 5842:5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 208.00 335695 738895 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 120.00 335696 738896 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 923.35 335697 738972 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 44.80 335823 738971 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,172.80 335824 738970 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,543.10 380172: 212012014 118063; DC MANAGEMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1,175.35 LEAD REMOVAL 335765 14 -01 -03 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,175.35 380173` 212012014 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,962.60 MAR 2014 STD 335766 F018342 -2114 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,962.60 380174 212012014 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 256.08 TORCHES, LIGHTS 00001601 335909 874420 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 256.08 380175 2120/2014 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 6,777.18 JAN 2014 SURCHARGE 335767 19053053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 6,777.18 380176 212012014 100726 DIESEL COMPONENTS INC. 118.80 DIESEL CONDITIONER 00005850 335768 S121524 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 118.80 380177 2120/2014 123162 :DISH 53.47 8255 7070 8142 2839 335769 020414 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 53.47 380178 2120/2014 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC 498.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335731 13286 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 498.75 380179 212012014 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC 890.15 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335732 132863 5200.1727 GOLF DOME, GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 890.15 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 211912014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/2012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380179 212012014 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC Continued... 380180 212012014 131164 DONALD R FRANTZ CONCRETE CONSTRUCT LLC 714.40 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335733 1328C3 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 714.40 380181 212012014 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 47.88 PUBLISH NOTICE 335646 65251 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 127.68 AD FOR BID 335647 67545 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 127.68 AD FOR BID 335648 67546 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 47.88 PUBLISH NOTICE 335649 70054 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 2,324.55 JAN 2014 PAPER INSERT 335770 71021 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 101.08 PUBLISH NOTICE 335910 71954 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 79.80 PUBLISH NOTICE 335911 71953 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 47.88 PUBLISH NOTICE 335912 71955 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 933.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 335913 73107 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 933.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 335913 73107 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 933.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 335913 73107 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON.SELLING 5,703.43 380182 212012014 103594 EDINALARM INC. 596.37 6 MOS. ALARM MONITORING 335572 86015 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 596.37 6 MOS. ALARM MONITORING 335572 86015 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 596.35 6 MOS. ALARM MONITORING 335572 86015 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,789.09 380183 2/2012014 101956 .EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 1,133.28 E-82 REPAIRS 335771 72489 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,133.28 380184 2/2012014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 64.99 BATTERY 335573 69- 127810 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.95 SPL 700322 335574 70- 176394 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.85 SPL 700322 335575 69- 127373 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.19 BATTERY 335576 69- 128044, 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.75 MINIATURE LAMPS 335577 69- 128107 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.44 PUMPASSEMBLY 335578 69- 128090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.06 END KITS 335650 1- 4377935 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 384.13 END KITS, RACK & PINION 335651 69- 128242 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.47 WIRE ASSEMBLY, RESISTOR 335652 69- 128333 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.56 CONTROLARM 335653 69- 128314 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2120/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380184 2120/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 15.44 WIRE & CABLE 335654 69- 128352 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20.44 RESISTOR ASSEMBLY 335655 69- 128382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105.36 OIL 335656 69- 128475 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,196.63 380185 2/20/2014 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 23.06 8326063 335772 T2- 332768 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 23.06 380186 2/2012014 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 37.04 RAMSET LOADS 00001486 335954 MNTC2121728 1301.6556 TOOLS 37.04 380187 2120/2014 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 237.48 AD FOR BID 335657 741399547 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 240.43 AD FOR BID 335658 741399546 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 477.91 380188 2/2012014 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 900.00 FIRE HOSES 00001498 335914 66643 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 900.00 380189 212012014 100764 G & K SERVICES 200.82 335773 013114 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 133.84 335773 013114 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 195.00 335773 013114 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 65.35 335773 013114 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 19.31 335773 013114 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 54.57 335773 013114 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 668.89 380190 212012014 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 265.30 GLOVES 00001570 335915 1019967322 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 265.30 380191 212012014 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEAPOLIS 228.96 335774 123114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 63.95 335774 123114 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 114.23 335774 123114 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 407.14 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS LICENSING, PERMITS& RECORDS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE. GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 -- 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380191 212012014 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEAPOLIS 380192 212012014 133634 GETTEN, GEORGE 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335961 021114 1470.4329 25.00 380193 212012014 128160 GLASS MAN TC, THE 610.00 INSULATED GLASS 335579 49547 5511.6406 610.00 380194 212012014 132593 GORMAN SURVEYING INC. 614.25 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335734 8394 5200.1727 614.25 380195 2/2012014 101103 GRAINGER 278.94 LUBRICANTS, RUST INHIBITOR 00001569 335580 9353674766 1646.6406 227.36 RECOVERY STRAPS 00001515 335581 9349579046 1646.6406 79.22 PNEUMATIC WHEELS 00001510 335582 9347524481 1301.6556 74.67 SALT CONTAINERS 00001584 335659 9357890541 1646.6406 160.20 MARKING PAINT 00001540 335660, 9359167377 5913.6532 142.32 CLASSROOM FANS 00001516. 335775, 9349579053 7411.6406 962.71 380196 2120/2014 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 168.18 ALIGNMENT 335916 63541 1553.6180 168.18 380197 .212012014 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 254.50 335698 163147 5842.5513 642.25 335825 163148 5862.5513 380198 2120/2014 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 300.00 KIDS KAMP GOLF INSTRUCTION 335776 021214 300.00 380199 212012014 105539 GREYSTONE CONSTRUCTION CO. 39,928.50 GRANDVIEW REMODEL 335918 24301 39,928.50 380200 2120/2014 104459 GS DIRECT INC. Subledger Account Description Continued... AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 11 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380200 2120/2014 104459 GS DIRECT INC. Continued... 50.95 OCE PAPER 335917 304484 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 380208 2120/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 252.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 335919 021214 1644.6107 252.56 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE BOARD & ROOM PRISONER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DATA PROCESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 12 Business Unit PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF ANIMAL CONTROL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 50.95 380201 2120/2014 133638 HAKANSON ANDERSON 14,800.00 PAMELA PARK SITE SURVEY 335777 32590 47090.6710 14,800.00 380202 2120/2014 133639 HASCO TAG COMPANY 462.66 DOG LICENSE TAGS 00003019 335778 18609 1450.6406 462.66 380203 2/2012014 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 11,844.08 MAR 2014 PREMIUM 335779 45956968 1550.6040 1,724.28 MAR 2014 COBRA 335780 45953840 1550.6043 47.49- 335962 45956968 -2013 1550.6040 602.73 335963 45953840 -2013 1550.6043 14,123.60 380204 212012014 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,273.50 DEC 2013 BOOKINGS 335964 1000038872 1195.6225 1,273.50 380205 2120/2014 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 335661 1000038941 1190.6105 160.31 BUNDLED SERVICE 335662 1000038940 1400.6160 320.62 380206 212012014 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 33.49 PAINT 00001467 335955 03087662 1301.6406 33.49 380207 2/2012014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,417.25 335699 687989 5842.5514 t 427.00 335700 687936 5822.5514 744.00 335826 687931 5862.5514 380208 2120/2014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 252.56 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 335919 021214 1644.6107 252.56 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION COBRA INSURANCE BOARD & ROOM PRISONER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DATA PROCESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 12 Business Unit PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF ANIMAL CONTROL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL LEGAL SERVICES ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE I R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380208 212012014 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS Continued... 380209 212012014 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 677.22 MAIL WATER BILLS 335583 86386 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 677.22 380210 212012014 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 420.00 335701 17169 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 420.00 380211 212012014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 128.18 PVC, FITTINGS 00001585 335584 823735 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 128.18 380212 2120/2014 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES LLC 381.64 RICHFIELD 911 335965 080633 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 381.64 380213 212012014 132871 INGLAS LLP 606.10 BRAEMER GOLF DOME 335735 APPL 3 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 606.10 380214 212012014 131548 INNOVATIVE OFFICE SOLUTIONS LLC 910.00 STOOLS 335585 IN0458658 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.00- CREDIT 335586 SCN- 018878 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 870.00 380215 2120/2014 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 20.27 TABLE CARDS 335587 96259 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 20.27 380216 212012014 104157 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC. 399.00 SEMINAR FEE 335920 INVO388080 1495.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 399.00 380217 212012014 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 27,596.93 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335736 350263 -07 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 27,596.93 380218 212012014 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 28.96 ACCT1225394AD 335781 013114 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION i R55CKR2 LOGIS100 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2/1912014 9:51:13 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register by GL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Page - 14 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register and Summary COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380218 212012014 50TH ST SELLING 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 50TH ST SELLING Continued... 50TH ST SELLING 28.96 380219 212012014 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 75.42 335782 013114 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.52 335782 013114 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 70.29 335782 013114 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 116.46 335782 013114 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 277.69 380220 2/2012014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,197.70 335827 2180610 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 17.55 335828 2180612 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 335829 2180622 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,525.32 335830 2180621 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 65.68- 335831 2180620 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,696.39 380221 2/20/2014 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 40.08 ICE EATER SALT 00006096 335588 67067634 40.08 380223 2120/2014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 377.35 335702 1778679 26.99- 335703 608207 84.23 335832 1777673 447.13 335833 1777582 252.69 335834 1777675 .56 335835 1781159 5,713.86 335836 1781174 1,132.05 335837 1781161 3,647.94 335838 1781165 2,659.48 335839 1781176 4,010.93 335840 1781177 1,816.64 335841 1781179 1,667.92 335842 1781175 996.08 335843 1781166 314.90 335844 1781178 991.87 335845 1781158 1,420.95 335846 1781160 25828 335847 1781167 5422.6406 5822.5513 51142.5512 5822.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Cheek Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2120/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380223 212012014 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 209.24 335848 1781168 5822.5512 205.62 335849 1781170 5822.5512 1,274.19 335850 , 1781181 5862.5512 2,745.68 335851 1781180 5862.5512 555.00 335852 1781164 5862.5512 205.62 335853 1781184 5862.5512 1,771.92 335854 1781163 5862.5513 1,619.02 335855 1781183 5862.5513 1,816.64 335856 1781185 5862.5513 2,378.11 335857 1781182 5862.5513 1,132.05 335858 1778680 5862.5513 377.35 335859 1781162 5862.5513 40,056.31 380224 212012014 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 20.04 SWITCH, RELAY 00001582 335921 039539 5921.6406 103.80 MOTOR 00001581 335922 039508 5915.6406 123.84 380225 2/20/2014 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES 108.33 BALL BEARING INSERT 00005933 335663 T717929 1553.6530 108.33 380226 2/20/2014 105606 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC. 3,222.44 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335737 1306600005 5200.1727 3,222.44 380227 2/20/2014 129942 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 167.30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 335966 021014 5760.6107 167.30 380228 2120/2014 105269 KORTERRA INC. 1,122.10 TICKET SPLITTING SERVICE FEE 00001544 335589 14665 5913.6103 1,122.10 380229 212012014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 335.92 WIRE, FUSEHOLDERS, ANCHORS 00005841 335590 9302216859 1553.6530 248.06 NUTS, BOLTS 00001509 335956 9302198964 1325.6406 583.98 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 15 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT WATER TREATMENT REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380230 2120/2014 116399 L- HEUREUX,ADAM Continued... 104.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335923 021814 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 104.99 380231 212012014 132752 LINCO FAB INC. 8,027.50 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335738 APPL 2 5200.1727 GOLF DOME 8,027.50 380232 2120/2014 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 886.17 RUBBER BELTING 00005915 335591 00053055 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 886.17 380233 212012014 133637 LOGUE, MARY 360.75 ART WORK SOLD 335784 021114 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 360.75 380234 2120/2014 101078 LURE -TECH ESI 427.44 NOZZLES 00005966 335592 3461 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 427.44 380235 2120/2014 101361 M.IA.MA. 150.00 2014 DUES 335937 2451 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 150.00 380236 212012014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 33.41 ROLLER STUD 00005924 335593 214129D 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 33.41 380237 212012014 129322 MANAGED DESIGN LLC 1,295.00 TRAINING- TOM HAATAJA 335594 16852 1261.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,295.00 380238 212012014 131581 MARCO INC. 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 16 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 9,724.85 SEMIANNUAL PRINTER CONTRACT 335595 INV1799560 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 9,724.85 380239 21204014 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT 1,369.77 COMMERCIAL ESTIMATOR 7 335785 1051890 -2014 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,369.77 380240 212012014 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/2012014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380240 2/2012014 102560 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC. 530.00 TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAY 00004302 335786 15215 5710.6513 530.00 380241 212012014 132234 MCDONALD, VIRGINIA 1,437.80 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT REFUND 335974 021114 1470.4329 1,437.80 380242 2/2012014 101928 MCKEN7IE, THOMAS 189.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335924 021814 1400.6203 189.99 380243 212012014 101483 MENARDS 56.84 PAINT, PRIMER 00006084 335596 47277 5420.6530 95.32 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00001562. 335597 48168 1646.6530 14.49 DROP CLOTH 00001592 335664 48958 1301.6556 55.97 OUTDOOR LIGHTS 00001482 335925 46781 1318.6406 63.90 CONTACT CEMENT, PANELS 00001479 335926 47011 1400.6406 28.43 SHELF BRACKETS 00001483 335927 46789 1325.6531 14.59 PARTICLE BOARD 00001491, 335928 47138 1400.6406 77.34 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 00001496 335929 47232 1325.6531 9.15 SELECT BOARD 00001587 335930 48848 5640.6406 60.36 ARNESON REPAIR PARTS 00001588 335931 48873 1646.6406 185.35 BIT, SCREW, BOARDS 00001594 335932 49175 1318.6406 6.78 SANDBAG SUPPLIES 00001604 335933 49361 1301.6556 92.00 PAINT, DOWELS, PLYWOOD 00001511 335957 47848 1301.6406 53.87 CASTERS, PRIMER 00001512 335958 47846 1335.6406 132.94 TOOLS 00001411 335967 44777 1646.6406 947.33 380244 212012014 101987 MENARDS 70.65 BATTERIES, TOOLS 00002293.' ` 335598 33828 5720.6406 104.97 STAPLE HAMMERS 335968 31413 1335.6406 175.62 380245 212012014 102281. MENARDS 36.60 SELECT BOARD 00001600 335934 47153 5840.6406 9.15 SELECT BOARD 00001600 335935 47152 5840.6406 45.75 380246 212012014 100885 METRO SALES INC 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 17 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS_ REPAIR PARTS TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SIGNS & POSTS GENERALSUPPLIES SIGNS & POSTS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE PAVEMENT MARKINGS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERALSUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS GENERALSUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL I R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 ,I.Council Check Register and Summary I 2/20/2014 -- 2/2012014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380246 212012014 106885 METRO SALES INC Continued... 105.13 COPIER USAGE 335969 574098 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 105.13 380247 212012014 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 9,840.60 JAN 2014 SAC 335599 021114 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS I> - _ 9,840.60 j 380248 212012014 101471 MGCSA 535.00 MGCSA DUES 335789 2014 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 535.00 380249 212012014 133630 MIDWESTCOMMERCIAL- FENCE 32,763.60 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335739 20130026 -33 5200.1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 32,763.60 380250 - 2120/2014 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 14,860.00 RINK FENCE 00001424 335970 160122 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 14,860.00 380251 212012014 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER 8 WATER 927.50 REPLACE STAND PIPE 335787 33223 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 927.50 REPAIR STANDPIPE 00001559 335938 34650 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,855.00 380252 212012014 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 35.78 CO2, METHAIR 335788 171087387 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 35.78 380253 212012014 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 32.18 WINDOW WASHING - 335600 928020151 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 42.75 WINDOW WASHING 335601 928020150 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 10.69 WINDOW WASHING 335665 928020478 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 85.62 380254 2120/2014 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 100.00 JOB POSTING 335936 7985 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 100.00 380255 212012014 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY.OF CPAS 259.00 DUES - ERIC ROGGEMAN 335790 2014 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/2012014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380255 2120/2014 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPAS 259.00 380256 2/2012014 102812 MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 20.00 BOILER LICENSE 335791 ABR00900751 5913.6260 20.00 380257 212012014 133508 MN STATE CURB AND GUTTER 773.06 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335740 BP132B 5200.1727 773.06 380268 212012014 132591 MUSKA ELECTIRC COMPANY 1,733.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335741 APPL 7 5200.1727 1,324.30 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335742 SEVEN 5200.1727 3,058.05 380259 212012014 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 125.00 FEB 2014 AD 335792 408991 5110.6122 125.00 MAR 2014 AD 335793 422941 5110.6122 250.00 380260 212012014 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 137.03 LENSES 00005932 335602 35389 1553.6530 258.89 LENSES 00005932 .335603 35415 1553.6530 869.77 RANGE LIGHTING 335794 35442 7412.6406 1,265.69 380261 212012014 106023 ., NORTHLAND PAVING 18,810.00 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335743 THREE 5200.1727 18,810.00 380262 212012014 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 36.59 CABLE 00005929 335604 531884, 1553.6530 96.95 SLING 00005895 335605 531972 1553.6585 133.54 380263 212012014 116669 ON CALL SERVICES 440.99 LOGROLL FOR PLAY STRUCTURE 335971 2410 5720.6530 440.99 380264 212012014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. CITY OF EDINA 60.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 335607 Council Check Register by GL 60.00 Council Check Register and Summary 380267 212012014 119935 PET CROSSING 2120/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380264 212012014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,733.26 335704 8436498 -IN 5842.5513 1,464.12 32.50 335705 8436502 -IN 5822.5513 021314 629.81 32.50 335860 8436505 -IN 5862.5513 3,827.19 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 380265 212012014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 335861 2559362 218.55 1,829.02 335606 18609790 5730.5510 2559363 288.43 1,289.88 335666 18609845 5761.5510 2559361 841.89 69.97 335939 18609832 5520.5510 2559349 1,348.87 1,416.80 335865 380266 212012014 124239 PERSONNEL EVALUATION INC. 60.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS 335607 07560 60.00 380267 212012014 119935 PET CROSSING 5.99 K9 TOOTHPASTE 335608 130262 5.99 380268 212012014 133631 PETERMAN, LUCAS 32.50 ART WORK SOLD 335795 021314 32.50 380269 212012014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 288.79 335861 2559362 1,829.02 335862 2559363 1,289.88 335863 2559361 69.97 335864 2559349 1,416.80 335865 2559350 1,134.63 335866 2559351 249.71 335867 2559357 1,876.60 335868 2559358 148.77 335869 2559352 1,861.69 335870 2559359 551.54 335871 2559360 351.60 335872 2559353 9.50- 335873 3520666 15.99- 335874 3520664 20.75- 335875 3520662 12.00- 335876 3521183 Subledger Account Description Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5101.4413 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513. 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5513 ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2119/2014 9:51:13 Page - 20 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING ARENA CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION ART CENTER REVENUES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING' VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/2012014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380269 2/2012014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 11, 010.76 380270 212012014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00_ . NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 335951 021814 1628.6235 350.00 380271 212012014 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 800.00 DATA PLAN 335609 IN200- 1001168 1301.6406 800.00 380272 2/2012014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 198.00 BLADE SHARPENING 335610 268650 5521.6215 198.00 380273 212012014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 616.38 ICE MELT 00002278 335611 6679 5720.6406 254.14 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE 00002279 335612 6705 5720.6406 161.13 CUP LIDS 335613 6706 5730.5510 1,031.65 . 380274 212012014 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 692.00 ACCESS CARDS 335614 65816 1554.6406 692.00 380275 212012014 101744 QUALITY -FLOW SYSTEMS 3,959.00 PUMP REPAIRS 00001520 335615 27501 5921.6180 3,959.00 380276 212012014 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 1,727.05 BEARINGS 00006097 335616 CD1755159 5422.6530 1,727.05 380277 212012014 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 6,776.88 GOLF MATS 00006276 335617 64225 5210.6590 6,776.88 380278 2120/2014 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 195.00 WINDSHIELD REPAIR 335940 69480 1553.6180 195.00 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 21 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380279 2120/2014 125,178 RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC 5,574.08 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335730 1305018708 5200.1727 5,574.08 380280 2120/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 206.50 BUSINESS CARDS 335616 80047 1550.6406 ! 233.07 ENVELOPES 335619.80051 1190.6406 233.07 ENVELOPES 335619 80051 1130.6575 108.84 ENVELOPES 335941 80148 5760.6513 781.48 380281 2/2012014 133635 ROYAL DESIGN & RENOVATIONS LLC 1,302.40 PERMIT REFUND 335796 ED127949 1495.4111 1,302.40 380282 212012014 133643 SAHARA, RICHARD 350.00 VARIANCE FEE REFUND 335942 021314 1140.4361 350.00 380283 2120/2014 117807 SAM'S CLUB 176.83 SW METRO FACILITY SUPPLIES 335797 020714 7411.6406 176.83 380284 212012014 125199 SCHADEGG, ANTHONY 132.00 CARPENTRY REIMBURSEMENT 335798 021314 5111.6103 i 132.00 380285 2/2012014 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. t 50.14 WOOD FOR WINE RACK 00001583 335943 41184244 5842.6406 40.80- CREDIT 335944 3141494 5842.6406 9.34 380286 2/20/2014 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 788.58 QUARTERLY BILLING 335620 8103662154 1628.6103 788.58 380287 212012014 124792 SCHUELLER, JASON 155.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335667 021014 1301.6201 155.96 • 380288 212012014 100995 SEH 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 22 Subledger Account Description Business Unit Continued... GOLF DOME - GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS PLANNING FEES PLANNING GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 . LOGIS100 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register by GL YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380288 212012014 100995 SEH 7,682.16 SPRINT COLOC @ VAN VALKENBERG 335945 276908 1001.4722 1,057.22 CLEARWIRE 335945 276908 1001.4722 744.50 HAIL DAMAGE INSPECTION 335945 276908 5913.6103 9,483.88 380289 2120/2014 130047 SELECTACCOUNT 1,500.00 ANNUAL FEE 335799 977892 1556.6103 1,053.00 JANIFEB 2014 335800 983051 1556.6103 2,553.00 380290 2/20/2014 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 74.98 SPRAY PAINT 00001475 335959 6384 -8 4090.6406 74.98 380291 212012014 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 878.00 SOFTWARE LICENSE 335621 801659544 1554.6160 321.00 VMWARE LICENSE 335801 801672670 1554.6160 1,199.00 380292 212012014 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC. 82.72 HOT DOG BUNS 335622 235753 5520.5510 69.53 HOT DOG BUNS 335946 236073 5520.5510 152.25 380293 212012014 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 236.00 SECURITY CAGE FOR ARMORY 335802 9012 1400.6406 236.00 380294 2120/2014 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 1,748.99 COOLER REPAIRS 335972 44573 5861.6180 1,748.99 380295 2120/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,656.22 335706 1130296 5862.5512 69.73 335707 1130299 5862.5512 1,546.00 335708 1130293 5842.5513 329.00 335709 1130289 5822.5513 1,600.00 335710 1130287 5822.5513 4,207.89 335711 1125820 5842.5512 5.00 335712 _1130290 5842.5512 Subledger Account Description Continued... RENTAL OF PROPERTY RENTAL OF PROPERTY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2119/2014 9:51:13 Page - 23 Business Unit GENERAL FUND REVENUES GENERAL FUND REVENUES DISTRIBUTION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/1912014 9:51:13 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380295 2120/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 69.73 335713 1130294 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR,: YORK SELLING 919.50 335714 1130292 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' 12,931.49 335715 1130291 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 56.00- 335716:'0007843 5822.5513: COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,552.75 335877 1130297 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,110.50 335878 1130298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,205.50 335879 1130300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,649.15 335880 1130286 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 134.97 335881 1130288 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33,931.43 380296 212012014 101004 SPS COMPANIES 25.45 TUBE CUTTER 00001597 335668 S2861502.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 25.45 380297 2/2012014 101007 STAR TRIBUNE - 360.00 PAYROLL SPECIALIST AD 335669 1009800907 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL' 360.00 380298 2/2012014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 210.00 335882 2623 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 369.50 335883 2596 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 579.50 380299 212012014 124799 STERLING WELDING COMPANY INC. 625.00 THAW OUT SERVICE LINE 00001552 335803 15148 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 250.00 00001553 335804 15149 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,562.50 00001554 335805 15150 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,437.50 380300 2120/2014 101015 STREICHERS " 199.99 BOOTS 335623 11072171 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 433.47 UNIFORMS 335973 11045209 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 633.46 380301 212012014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 371.59 CONTROL ARMS 00005009 335806 1532108 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 371.59 380302 212012014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2120/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380302 2/20/2014 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 222.92 TIRES 00005003 335670 10123750 1553.6583 222.92 380303 212012014 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 35.09 PHONE LISTING 335947 020414 5821.6188 35.09 PHONE LISTING 335947 020414 5841.6188 35.07 PHONE LISTING 335947 020414 5861.6188 105.25 380304 212012014 113554 SWANSON & YOUNGDALE INC. 935.75 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335744 1312130 5200.1727 935.75 380305 2120/2014 102300 TCALMC 95.00 4/10/14 TRAINING 335807 S. KLAPPERICK 1281.6104 95.00 380306 212012014 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMPANY 950.80 BRUSHES, FILTERS 00005950 335671 912151849 1553.6530 950.80 380307 2/2012014 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 795.99 JAN 2014 SERVICES 335624 828955303 . 1400.6105 795.99 380308 2/2012014 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 72.20 335884 804754 5862.5515 1,202.65 335885 804755 5862.5514 1,274.85 380309 212012014. 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 241.00 TASK FORCE MEETING MINUTES 335672 M20301 1120.6103 176.00 1/21/14 COUNCIL MEETING 335673 M20304 1185.6103 131.00 ARTS COMMISSION MEETING 335674 M20305 5110.6103 548.00 380310 212012014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 51.53 WELDING GAS 335625 40003083 1553.6580 31.53 WELDING CYLINDERS 335675 40003084 5761.6406 83.06 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 25. Subledger Account Description . Business Unit Continued... TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME CONFERENCES &,SCHOOLS REPAIR PARTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET TRAINING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/1912014 9:51:13 ;. Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380310 212012014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Continued... 380311 212012014 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 220.23 COPIER USAGE 335808 246896476 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 220.23 380312 2120/2014 101047' TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 104.50 BRAEMAR GOLF DOME 335745 407499 5200:1727 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME BALANCE SHEET 104.50 - 380313 2120/2014 126032 UNI- SELECT USA 794.28 PARTS 335809 013114 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 794.28 380314 212012014 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 112.31 CUPS 335626 300699 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. GRILL 298.87 LIQUOR BAGS 335676 301252 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 411.18 380316 2120/2014 115380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. 157.73 PUMP 00005892 335677 IN060- 1001865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.73 - 380316 212012014 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 775.00 CATALOG DESIGN 335627 2014 -1 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 775.00 380317 212012014 133640 VELOCITY MASTER DRAIN TECHNICIANS 2,008.13 THAW OUT SERVICE LINE 00001555 335810 6697 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,008.13 380318 2120/2014 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 7.50 SAFETY GLASSES 00005851 335678 3009148 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005851 335678 3009148 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 10.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005851 335678 3009148 1646.6610 SAFETY. EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005851 335678 3009148 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 117.50 380319 212012014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 61.10 BRATS 335628 78687 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 60.99 BRATS 335629 78690 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2120/2014 - 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380319 212012014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS Continued... 122.09 380320 212012014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 486.40 LIGHTING 00001572 335630 15240508 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 486.40 380321 212012014 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI -MN 265.71 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 98.90 335679 4366- 2808 -5 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 133.09 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 153.09 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 439.57 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 439.58 335679 4366- 2808 -5 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 113.09 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 55.34 335679 4366- 2808 -5 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 127.31 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 161.50 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 65.75 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 331.38 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 1,165.45 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 121.09 335679 4366 - 2808 -5 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 186.00 335679 4366- 2808 -5 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,856.85 380322 212012014 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC. 654.32 LEAK LOCATES 00001546 335631 4651 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 654.32 380323 212012014 130574 WATSON COMPANY 559.78 CONCESSION PRODUCT 335632 835898 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 559.78 380324 212012014 103219 WENDEL SGN ARCHITECTURE INC. 2,103.75 PAMELA PARK SHELTER DESIGN 335811 338936 47090.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,103.75 380325 2/2012014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,193.45 335717 353201 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 804.18 335886 353199 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 320.40 335887 353197 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 27 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS EDINBOROUGH' OPERATIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION ARENA CONCESSIONS PAMELA PK SHELTER & TURF YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc N 380325 2120/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Continued... 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page - 28 Business Unit 2,318.03 380326 212012014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 3,554.92 335888 491414 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,238.06 335889 491410 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,390.36 335890 491411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING _• 7,183.34 380327 212012014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 10,643.03 335718 1080143006 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 2,788.22 335719 1080143007 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.65 335720 1080143008 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 925.55 335721 1080143005 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,617.37 335722 1080142931 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 32.67- 335723 2080027992 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 155.35- 335724 2080026850 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING - 699.95 335891 1080143004 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3,056.83 335892 1080142932 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 122.30 335893 1080142933 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21,788.88 380328 212012014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 43.00 335725 1090179540 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 432.00 335726 1090179539 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,092.90 335727 109679538' 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 335728 1090178787 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,874.50 335729 1090178786 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 376.25 335894 1090181575 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,564.01 335895 1090181577 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 246.00 335896 1090181578 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,874.66 380329 212012014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 952.88 51- 4197645 -8 335633 400631325 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,746.10 51- 6840050 -6 335634 400272127 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 6,352.60 51- 5888961 -7 335680 400419040 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 647.79 51- 5619094 -8 335681 400420848 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,189.07 51- 6824328 -7 335812 400274579 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 6,359.84 51- 6121102 -5 335813 400599882 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16,017.88 51- 5605640 -1 335814 400967261 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/20/2014 — 2/20/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380329 212012014 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 10,481.72 51- 6955679 -8 335948 401503660 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 49,747.88 380330 2/20/2014 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 12,602.23 DIESEL FUEL 00005976 335949 609435 1553.6581 GASOLINE 12,602.23 380331 2120/2014 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 169.00 335897 12702 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 169.00 380332 2120/2014 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 2,067.00 CONVEYOR BELTS, SHOE PLATE 335682 0147846 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,067.00 380333 2/2012014 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 61.04 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 335815 54060510 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.04 380334 2120/2014 101091 ZIEGLER INC 1,900.00 HAMMER RENTAL 00005946 335635 K7344901 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 335683 E6395959 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 95.73 FILTERS 00005039 335950 PC001538997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,445.73 653,251.31 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 653,251.31 Total Payments 653,251.31 2/19/2014 9:51:13 Page- 29 Business Unit CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/19/2014 9:51:23 Council Check Summary Page- 1 2/20/2014 - 2/20/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 184,336.03 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 585.50 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 53,757.84 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,692.41 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 111,021.78 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,415.05 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 14,439.46 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,548.37 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,997.67 05800 LIQUOR FUND 212,069.16 05900 UTILITY FUND 45,697.71 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 37.24 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,690.49 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,962.60 Report Totals 653,251.31 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of "the City of Edina purchasing policies nd Procedures d e - ��`i! 7 - - 0 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2127/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No '1nv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380336 2/27/2014 100613 AAA 33.00 VEHICLE TAB RENEWAL 336018 021514 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 33.00 380336 2/27/2014 124613 ABM JANITORIAL -NORTH CENTRAL INC. 2125/2014 11:18 :11 Page- 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,753.75 FEB 2014 SERVICES 336019 6294500 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,753.75 380337 2/27/2014 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 35.60 336055 1763034 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 51.60 336199 1763035 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 15.55 336200 1765676 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 40.40 336201 1765677 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 143.15 380338 2127/2014 123743 ADESA MINNEAPOLIS 46.95 VEHICLE DIAGNOSTICS 336020 3625 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.95 380339 2127/2014 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 252.00 VIDEO EQUIPMENT 336266 ALERTINV15899 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 252.00 380340 212712014 106991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 197.45 COFFEE 335975 155733 1628.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 197.45 380341 2/27/2014 101681 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 565.00 DUES - CARY TEAGUE 336267 085192 -13113 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING 565.00 380342 2/27/2014 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 12.00 SHIPPING CHARGES 336100 43391 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 12.00 380343 2127/2014 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 620.00 336056 42183 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 14.00- 336057 10394 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15.68- 336058 9123 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 819.00 336202 .42184_ 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,409.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 336059 89764100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 82.00 336060 41822200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 93.54 Council Check Register by GL 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 419.10 Council Check Register and Summary 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 667.01 2127/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380343 2/27/2014 5842.5514 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY YORK SELLING, 117.60 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336104 114295 Continued... 380344 2/27/2014 ARENA CONCESSIONS 106304 ASPEN MILLS, 663.55 UNIFORMS 00003749 336101 146345 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 663.55 380346 2/27/2014 132408 AUTHENTIC EDGE LLC 1,308.00 COACHING FEE 335976 AE1031 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1;308.00 380346 2127/2014 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 239.85 BUSINESS CARDS 335977 499 1400.6575 PRINTING 239.85 380347 2127/2014 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 271.50 GENERAL REVIEW SERVICES 335978 126916 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 271.50 380348 2/27/2014 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 7,628.59 3930 REMEDIATION 336102 23271292.05 -2 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - :OTHER 10,452.47 3930 REMEDIATION 336293 23271292.05 -1 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 18,081.06 380349 2/27/2014 102196 BATTERIES PLUS 27.72 BATTERIES 00001576 335979 018- 328833 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 24.99 BATTERIES 00001614 335980 018 - 329847 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.16 BATTERIES 00003035 335981 018- 329827 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 184.48 BATTERIES 336103 018 - 326716 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 293.35 380350 2127/2014 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2125/2014 11:18:11 Page -. 2 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL HUMAN RESOURCES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT CENTENNIAL.TIF DISTRICT STREET NAME SIGNS BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION 72.37 336059 89764100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.00 336060 41822200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 93.54 336061 41822300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 419.10 336203 41822100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 667.01 380351 212712014 125139 BERNICK'S 324.00 336062 114298 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING, 117.60 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336104 114295 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 441.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380361 2/2712014 126139 BERNICK'S Continued... 360362 212712014 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 233.40. COFFEE 336106 1154347 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 290.50 COFFEE 336198 1153144 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 523.90 380363 2127/2014 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 165.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003034 335982 WO- 913662 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 26.99 STORAGE BOXES 00004021 335983 WO- 913673 -1 1160.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FINANCE 30.42 STAMPS 335984 WO- 910632 -1 1160.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES FINANCE 47.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 336107 WO- 914243 -1 1190.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ASSESSING 112.58 OFFICE SUPPLIES 336108 WO- 914616 -1 1120.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 383.09 380364 2127/2014 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 92.94 CANDY 336268 022214 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 92.94 380366 212712014 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 234165 LABELS 335985 93822 1495.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 234.65 380366 2/27/2014 133664 BON -TON STORES INC. 15,711.48 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 336269 6601 FRANCE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 15,711.48 380367 2/2712014 106367- BOUND'TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,169.72 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003734 336110 81311551 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.36 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003734 336111 81311552 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 147.18 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003739 336112 81331265 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,264.87 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003739 336113 81332070 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,634.13 380368 2/27/2014 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 219.00 336204 118234 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 219.00 380369 2/27/2014 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 17.20 STRAP KITS 00005041 336021 825722 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.93 CLAMPS 00005002 336022 823636 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 WEBSITE PHOTOS 336114 CITY OF EDINA 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 132.82 Council Check Register by GL 336114 2014 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE Council Check Register and Summary 130.00 STAFF PORTRAITS 336114 2014 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380369 2/27/2014 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 537.52 Continued... 336294 110.93 YOKE 336023 825665X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 250.00 196.07 U- JOINT, YOKE 336109 825665 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 382.13 RANGE BALLS 335988 924889912 380360 2/2712014 RANGE BALLS 126166 BRAUN, MICHAEL 9,900.00 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 4 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 330.82 WEBSITE PHOTOS 336114 2014 _ 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 132.82 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 336114 2014 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 130.00 STAFF PORTRAITS 336114 2014 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 203.47 PHOTOS FOR BUDGET COVER 336115 2015 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 537.52 WEBSITE & EXTRANET PHOTOS 336294 2012 1130.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 250.00 PHOTO SHOOT FOR AD 336294 2012 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,584.63 380361 21,2712014 102911 BROOKS, JOHN: 546.33 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 336116 022114 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT GENERAL 546.33 380362 2/27/2014 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 200.00 ENTERTAINMENT 3/6/14 336098 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 380363 2/27/2014 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 10,500.00 335986 924870300 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 10,500.00- 335987 924889909 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 9,900.00 RANGE BALLS 335988 924889912 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 9,900.00 380364 2/27/2014 119466 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,800.20 336063 437231 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 945.50 336064 437235 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 35.70 336065 437234 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,781.40 380366 2/2712014 120768 CD PRO -POWER CORDS INC. 145.52 POWER CORDS 00001593 335989 11446, 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 145.52 380366 2127/2014 133662 CEEFAY LEASING 1,245.00 DUPLICATE PAYMENT REFUND 336270 LICENSE FEES 1490.4351 UNDERGROUND PARK INSPECTION PUBLIC HEALTH 415.00 DUPLICATE PAYMENT REFUND 336270 LICENSE FEES 1490.4171 FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE PUBLIC HEAT R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380366 2/27/2014 133662 CEEFAY LEASING Continued... 1,660.00 380367 2/27/2014 123898 CENTURYLINK 22.18 952 944 -6522 336271 6522 -2/14 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 22.18 380368 2/27/2014 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 467.00 CHEMICALS, DISINFECTANT 336117 517871 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 467.00 380369 2/27/2014 100683 CHEMSEARCH 717.79 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 336118 1398210 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 717.79 380370 2/27/2014 106194 CITY OF RICHFIELD 96.00 SKI & SNOWSHOE:LESSONS 336024 EDINA SR CTR 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.00 380371 2/27/2014 114648 CIZEK, DARIN 58.79 POLICY TERMINATION 336272 AFLAC REFUND 9900.2033.12 CANCER INSURANCE -99 58.79 360372 2/27/2014 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 825.99 MAR 2014 MAINTENANCE 335990 021914 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 825.99 380373 2/27/2014 101346 COLOURS 8,135.00 SR CTR NEWSLETTER TEMPLATE 336295 10396 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 987.00 SR CTR LETTERHEAD TEMPLATE 336296 10396 -01 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 445.00 BRAEMAR GC LETTERHEAD TEMPLATE 336297 10424 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 9,567.00 380374 2/27/2014 120433 COMCAST 170.14 8772 10 614 0496856 336273 496856 -2/14 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 170.14 380376 2127/2014 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE 195.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 00008052 336119 61367 -0 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 195.00 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page- 5 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA ICE MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS PAYROLL CLEARING YORK OCCUPANCY COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register and Summary 2127/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380376 2/27/2014 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. Continued... 781.52 CLAY 336120 INV000084538 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 106.81 CERAMIC SUPPLIES 336121 INV000084914 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 890.33 380377 2/27/2014 133658 CORAH, JACKIE. 59.00 MUSEUM TRIP REFUND 336312 022514 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 59.00 380378 2/2712014 101590 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE 14,700.00 2014 SERVICES 336274 2014 -9 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 14,700.00 380379 2/2712014 104310 COUNTRY ENTERPRISES INC. 411.00 PLOW FLAGS 00005839 336025 34234 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 411.00 380380 2/27/2014 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 119.00 DRAIN CLEANING 336122 99881 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.00 380381 2127/2014 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 1,074.46 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 336298 2611865 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,074.46 380382 2/27/2014 104020 DALCO 1,855.14 ICE MELT 00001564 335991 2705794 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,855.14 ICE MELT 00001580 335992 2707867 4090.64D6 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 3,710.28 380383 2127/2014 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,507.96 336066 739942 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 429.85 336067 739941 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,937.81 380384 2/2712014 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 26.00 650487671 336123 650487671 -2/14 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 26.00 380386 212712014 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 751.00 HOOTEN ACQUISITON - LEGAL 336124 1926638 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL 7, DISTRICT R55CKR2 - .LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA i 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2127/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380386 2/27/2014 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Continued... 1,610.00 TIF LEGAL CONSULTING 336125 1926642 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,361.00 i 380386 2/27/2014 129079 DRAIN KING INC. 300.00 THAW WATER LINE 00001646 336126 90119 5913.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,100.00 THAW WATER LINE 00001645 336127 90292 5921.6180 _ CONTRACTED REPAIRS SANITARY LIFTSTATION MAINT 1,400.00 380387 2/2712014 132810 'ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 270.00 E- UTILITY BILLING AD 336026 75119 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 270.00 380388 2/27/2014 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1,000.00 GALASPONSOR 336128 34187 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,OOD.00 GALA SPONSOR 336128 34187 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,000.00 GALA SPONSOR 336128 34187 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 3,000.00 380389 2/27/2014 101966 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 1,188.50 T -90 REPAIRS 336129. 72169 1470.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,188.50 380390 2127/2014 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 375.50 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003699 336130 1619505 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 843.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003695 336299 1606651,RGA0315 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 89 1,569.13 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003698 336300 1611939 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,787.73 380391 2/27/2014 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 226.59 CERTIFICATION MATERIALS 336131 TRENCH RESCUE 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 226.59 380392 2/27/2014 102497 EXPLORER POST 926 2,166.00 EXPLORER CONFERENCE FEES 336275 022114 1419.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 2,166.00 380393 2/27/2014 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 336205 W- 912705 5622.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 23.73- 336206 259 -564 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11`.18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 - Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 l Check # Date Amount Supplier Y Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380393 2/27/2014 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. Continued... 291.27 380394 2127/2014 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 98.79 BATTERY 336027 69- 125531 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.32 ROTORS, PADS 336028 69- 128763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.44 FILTER 336029 69- 128789 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.91 FILTER, TRANSMISSION FLUID 336030 69- 128765 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 152.32 PADS, ROTORS 336031 69- 129043 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.88 LINK KITS 336032 69- 129143 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.88 LINK KITS 336033 1- 4384134 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.29 BATTERIES 00005847 336034 1- Z00499 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.98 LIGHT BULBS 336132 1- 4384911 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.21 HALOGEN CAPSULES 336133 69- 129299 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.72 OIL 336134 69- 129420 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,095.74 380395 2127/2014 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 166.67 METER HEAD 00001648 336135 0066988 -1 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 3,540.22 METERS 00001648 336136 0068948 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 2,048.20 CS FITTINGS 00001648 336137 0069145 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 397.83 COUPLINGS 00001557 336276 0069286 5913.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 6,152.92 380396 2127/2014 119211 FIRSTLAB 559.30 DRUG TESTING 335993 00742675 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 559.30 380397 2/2712014 102727 FORCE AMERICA _ 655.18 SENSORS 00005008 336138 01420899 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 655.18 380398 2/27/2014 101662 GCSAA 185.00 MEMBERSHIP- BRYAN SANFORD 336277 341283 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 185.00 380399 2/27/2014 102668 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 44.00 KEYS 00003754 336139 169041 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 44.00 380400 2/27" 102764 GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHESTRA R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CHEMICALS 00001250 336140 3562680 5915.6586 CITY.OF EDINA WATER TREATMENT 4,025.54 Council Check Register by GL 380407 2/27/2014 133663 HELMER, KYLE & DIANE Council Check Register and Summary UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REF_ UND 336278 3105 60TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 238.18 2/27/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380400 212712014 102764 GOLDEN VALLEY ORCHESTRA EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 336141 150882 Continued... PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 3/9/14 336099 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC —OTHER 380409 2/27/2014 100.00 380401 2/2712014 336068 689000 130461 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,150.00 RECRUITMENT SOFTWARE 336001 07 -11353 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING 13,150.00 380402 212712014 101103 GRAINGER 190.80 KNEE PADS, MAT 00005978 336035 9362627805 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 25.74 MAP HOLDER 00001607 336054 9364542606 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 216.54 380403 2127/2014 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 99.95 ALIGNMENT 00005012 336036 63772 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 99.95 380404 2/27/2014 420 50 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 9 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 336207 163423 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 224.50 336208 163424 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 645.00 380406 2/27/2014 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 6,111.08 MAR 2014 PREMIUM 336037 6636212 -0 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE'- 99 9.50 COBRA 336038 MAR 2014 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE 6,120.58 380406 2/27/2014 100797 HAWKINS INC. 40 PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL , 25.54 CHEMICALS 00001250 336140 3562680 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,025.54 380407 2/27/2014 133663 HELMER, KYLE & DIANE 238.18 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REF_ UND 336278 3105 60TH ST W 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 238.18 380408 2/27/2014 127071 HELMER PRINTING INC. 140.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 336141 150882 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 140.00 380409 2/27/2014 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 591.50 336068 689000 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380409 2/27/2014 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued... 418.00 336069 688728 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,009.50 360410 2/2712014 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 3/23/14 336308 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 - 380411 2/27/2014 133661 HOYE, PSYCHE 50.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 336279 022214 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE GOLF REVENUES 50.00 380412 2/27/2014 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 593.35 UNIFORM PURCHASE 335994 021814 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 593.35 380413 2/2712014 133666 HUNGERFORD, BRIAN 115.25 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 336280 6537 NAVAHO TR 59.00.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 115.25 380414 2127/2014 131644 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 150.00 336209 17174 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 150.00 380416 2/2712014 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 22.00 PVC TUBING 00001611 336142 825397 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 22.00 380416 212712014 106694 INFRATECH 900.00 LOCATOR 00001649 336143 1400055 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 900.00 380417 2/27/2014 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 25.00 MEMBERSHIP - TERRI WILSON 336281 2014 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES 25.00 380418 2/27/2014 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 17.44 335995 012514 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 182.10 335995 012514 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 188.53 335995 012514 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11.00 335995 012514 1553.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES EQUIPMENT 0 79ATIONGEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380418 2/27/2014 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 3,136.42 336070 463.46 335995 012514 1646.6406 48.57 335995 012514 1495.6406 23.07 335995 012514 1628.6406 37.60 335995 012514 4090.6406 74.36 335995 012514 5210.6406 29.42 335995 012514 5430.6406 2.23 335995 012514 5422.6406 279.14 335995 012514 5761.6406 124.78 335995 012514 5913.6406 1,461.70 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING Subledger Account Description Continued... GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS SENIOR CITIZENS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING DISTRIBUTION 380419 2/27/2014 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,136.42 336070 2180611 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,704.90 336071 2180646 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.00 336072 2180647 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 74.00 336210 2180613 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 17.55 336211 2164604 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 36.00 336212 2180665 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,021.10 336213 2180664 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 91.39- 336214 2180663 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,914.58 380421 2/27/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 168.46 336073 1777583 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,204.07 336074 1781169 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 58.24 336215 1781171 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,529.47 - 336216 1786309 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .19 336217 1786293 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 86.67 336218 1786308 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 49.02 336219 1786310 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 111.89 336220 1786313 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 266.01 336221 1766301 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,144.01 336222 1786304 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,348.88 336223 1786306 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,244.14 336224 1786302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.12 336225 1786292 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.24 336226 1786289 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,021.29 336227 1786300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,485.25 336228 1786303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,098.16 336229 1786305 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 659.90 Council Check Register by GL 336144 Page- 12 Council Check Register and Summary 336145 236641 -01 221.97 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 336146 236641 -02 Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger 'Account Description Business Unit 380421 2/27/2014 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 4,395.41 336230 1786291 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 103.90 336231 1786295 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 339.48 336232 1786297 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 981.26 336233 1786315 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 101.44- 336234 608208 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 23.33- 336235 608432 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 380422 2/27/2014 111018 KEEPRS INC. 659.90 UNIFORMS 000D3737 336144 236082 -01 231.95 UNIFORMS 00003736 336145 236641 -01 221.97 UNIFORMS 00003736 336146 236641 -02 1,113.82 380423 2/27/2014 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 27,754.99 FEASIBILITY STUDY 336147 5573922 21,381.12 FEASIBILITY STUDY 336301 5455562 49,136.11 380424 2127/2014 132612 KNUTSON DEVELOPMENT 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND -5712 BEARD AVE 336282 ED121989 2,500.00 380426 2/2712014 122616 KOPLOS, GERALD 50.00 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 336148 021414 50.00 380426 2/2712014 131966 KOTHRADE SEWER WATER & EXCAVATING 375.00 THAW WATER LINE 00001643 336149 15120K 885.00 THAW WATER LINE 00001644 336150 15173K 1,260.00 380427 :2/27/2014 126697 KREFTING, WAYNE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 3/27/14 336309 022014 150.00 380428 2/27/2014 128224 LAMBDA ALPHA INTERNATIONAL 20D.00 2014 MEMBERSHIP DUES 335996 2014 200.00 1470.6558 1470.6558 1470.6558 4090.6103 4090.6103 1495.4109 7410.6105 5923.6180 5913.6180 5710.6136 1100.6105 DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register and Summary 2/2712014 - 2127/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No .. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380429 2/2712014 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 26.25 PLOW BOLTS 00005841 336039 9302233384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.42 LOCK NUTS 00005001 336040 9302241490 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 872.87 PLOW BOLTS, FITTINGS 00005001 336151 9302235567 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 966.54 380430 2/2712014 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 4,018.50 PREMIUM 336152 3/18/14 - 3/17115 1556.6200 INSURANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 4,018.50 380431 2/27/2014 101463 LUTZ, RICHARD M. 330.88 UNIFORM PURCHASE 336153 021214 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 330.88 380432 2/27/2014 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 37.90 STRAP, MUFFLER 00005934 336041 2141590 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,057.58 EQUIPMENT PARTS 00005853 336154 2141605 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,095.48 380433 2/27/2014 101565 MARSHALL & SWIFT - 613.46 MARSHALL VALUATION SERVICE 336283 2014 - RENEWAL 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 613.46 380434 2/27/2014 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 320.00 HOSTING FEE 336155 192 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 320.00 380436 2/27/2014 133656 MCCALUY, SANDRA 59.00 MUSEUM TRIP REFUND 336310 022514 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 59.00 380436 2/27/2014 124447 MCCULLOUGH, SCOTT 150.00' PERFORMANCE 3/16/14 336306 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 380437 2/2712014 101483 MENARDS 184.99 STEPLADDER 00001605 335997 49380 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.32 OUTLETS 00006094 _336284 48142 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 246.27 BLOWERNAC, BRUSHES, MOPS 00008054 336302 45199 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 447.58 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2127/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380438 2127/2014 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS Continued... _ 171.00 ,OFFICIATING FEES 335998 4500 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE_ S 171.00 360439 2127/2014 101226 MILLERBERND 3,365.00 LIGHT POLES 00001345 335999 107682 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 3,365.00 380440 212712014 101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1,675.00 ANNUAL TIER II FEES 00001647 336156 HAZARDOUS WASTE 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 1,675.00 380441 2/27/2014 101637 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 251.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 336000 2200095361 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 251.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 336285 2200096194 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 251.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE FEE 336286 2200094930 5422.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL 753.00 380442 2/27/2014 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 1,440.00 POST LICENSES (16) 336287 022114 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1,440.00 380443 2/27/2014 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 24.46 CAMLOCKS 00005854 336157 0102689 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 24.46 380444 2/2712014 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 57.93 OPEN HOCKEY POSTERS 336158 14812 5510.6575 PRINTING 57.64 OPEN HOCKEY POSTERS 336303 14491, 5510.6575 PRINTING 115.57 380446 2/27/2014 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 200.00 PERFORMANCE 3/13/14 336305 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 200.00 380446 2127/2014 133667 NORTHGATE BREWING 57.00 336075 332 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 114.00 336236 331 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 171.00 380447 2127/2014 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 14 Business Unit ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 336164 55418 5761.6230 CITY OF EDINA CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 720.75 Council Check Register by GL 380461 2/27/2014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS Council Check Register and Summary 2,335.98 336076 8437475 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2/27/2014 - 2127/2014 671.86 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No. Account No Subledger Account Description 380447 2/27/2014 5642.5513 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. YORK SELLING 2,108.68 Continued... 8437484 -IN 97.96 SKETCH PADS 00009314 336159 45256702 5110:6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 64.74 ARTISTS OILS., 00009317 336160 45414400 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 162.70 380448 2/27/2014 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY 222.21 336162 013114 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 74.07 336162 013114 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 24.69 336162 013114 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 49.38 336162 013114 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 172.83 336162 013114 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 74.07 336162 013114 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 24.69 336162 013114 1554.6188 TELEPHONE 49.38 336162 013114 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 24.69 336162 013114 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 98.76 336162 013114 5410.6188 TELEPHONE 155.55 336162 013114 5710.6188 TELEPHONE 155.55 336162 013114 5760.6168 TELEPHONE 49.38 336162 013114 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 74.07 336162 013114 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 74.07 336162 013114 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 49.38 336162 013114 5913.6188 TELEPHONE 315.03 336163 W14010656 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 1,687.80 380449 2/27/2014 133280 O'GARA, LAURIE 283.00 SENIOR CENTER NEWSLETTER 336161 0004 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 283.00 380460 2127/2014 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 15 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SKATING & HOCKEY CENT SERV GEN - MIS BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK FIRE STATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT POOL OPERATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE SENIOR CITIZENS 720.75 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 00002096 336164 55418 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 720.75 380461 2/27/2014 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,335.98 336076 8437475 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 671.86 336077 8437480 -IN 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.25- 336078 8436863 -CM 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,108.68 336237 8437484 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,044.27 380452 2127/2014 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 240.24 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Council Check Register and Summary 251.61 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 336238 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380452 2127/2014 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 2562674 Continued... COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 355.91 336165 18609897 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 336240 355.91 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380453 2/27/2014 2,140.58 119936 PET CROSSING 336241 2562675 5842.5513 453.66 K9 EXAM 336042 130385 4607.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES 453.66 380454 2/2712014 131339 PETROVIC; FRANK 166.22 IPAD CHARGERS 336288 022114REIMBURSE 1100.6406 74.02 IPAD CASE 336288 022114REIMBURSE 1130.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 16 Business Unit ARENA CONCESSIONS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS 240.24 380455 2/27/2014 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 251.61 336238 2562676 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 774.39 336239 2562674 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 810.01 336240 2562670 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,140.58 336241 2562675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,036.12 336242 2562671 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,012.71 380457 2/27/2014 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 969:05 TIRES 00005848 336166 210103412 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 974.05 TIRES 00005848 336167 210103414 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,943.10 380468 2/2712014 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 4,513.23 ACTIVITIES DIRECTORY POSTAGE 336289 022114 1600.6235 POSTAGE PARKADMIN. GENERAL 4,513.23 380459 2/2712014 124836 zPR DIAMOND PRODUCTS INC. 242.00 CONCRETE CUTTING BLADE 00001571 336002 0031008 -IN . 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 242.00 380460 2127/2014 114070 PRECISION AUTO UPHOLSTERY INC. -. 198.50 SEAT CUSHION REPAIR 336044 88618 15516530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 198.50 380461 2/27/2014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 50.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00001613 336003 268841 1648.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 50.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 Business Unit Continued... FIRE DEPT: GENERAL CITY OF EDINA ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING SALES Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 380461 2/2712014 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 380462 212712014 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,405.44 TISSUE, LINERS, CLEANERS 00008061 336168 6745 5511.6406 .1,405.44 380463 2/27/2014 118966 QUINN, RYAN 848.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSE 336169 021914 1470.6104 848.00 380464 2/27/2014 123767 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC 515.00 DASHERBOARDAD SALES 336170 214151 -8 5501.4317 515.00 380466 212712014 118668 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 265.00 WINDSHIELD REPAIRS 336171 69500 1553.6180 265.00 380466 2127/2014 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 107.94 PINTLE HOOKS 00005005 336045 1927498068 1553.6530 107.94 380467 2127/2014 101000 RJM PRINTING INC. 56.50 BUSINESS CARDS 336004 79765 1495.6406 56.50 380468 2/27/2014 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 633.80 SOFTENER SALT 336172 00295762 5511.6406 633.80 380469 2/27/2014 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 628.58 PENS 336173 SH4208 1550.6406 628.58 380470 2/2712014 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 336174 INV -15061 -2014 1470.6160 753.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 336175 INV -15320 -2014 1470.6160 803.00 380471 2/27/2014 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 99.00 ARMREST 00005784 336046 P35850 1553.6530 2125/2014 11:18:11 Page - 17 :r Account Description Business Unit Continued... FIRE DEPT: GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS - FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING SALES ICE ARENA REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT: GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS100 336079 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ 50TH ST SELLING 6,468.00 Council Check Register by GL 1132538 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,293.28 Council Check Register and Summary 336244 1132539 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 380471 2/2712014 1132534 100990 SCHARBER & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - Continued... 3,485.01 99.00 1132536 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 380472 2127/2014 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 1132537 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 142.46 SCREWS, BITS 00001519 336005 41182748 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 66.32 LUMBER 00001563 336006 41182912 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 180.16 LUMBER, SCREWS 00001578 336007 41184033 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 388.94 1,158.57 380473 2/27/2014 57703 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,158.57 238.92 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 336290 021814 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 380478 2/27/2014 238.92 380474 2/2712014 84.00 111824 SIDEKICK 336080 2641 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 967.75 PLAN SCAN & INDEX 336304 4850 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 967.75 380479., 2/27/2014 124799 STERLING WELDING COMPANY INC. 380476 2127/2014 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 DASHERBOARD 336047 7525 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 185.00 380476 2/27/2014 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 18 Business Unit SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP INSPECTIONS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,755.50 336079 1132532 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _ 50TH ST SELLING 6,468.00 336243 1132538 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,293.28 336244 1132539 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING . 1,186.62 336245 1132533 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING .37 336246 1132534 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - YORK SELLING 3,485.01 336247 1132536 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.41 336248 1132537 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,016.95 336249 1132535 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 26,284.14 380477 2/27/2014 103266 STAN MORGAN $ ASSOCIATES INC 1,158.57 SHELVING 336176 57703 5861.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,158.57 380478 2/27/2014 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 84.00 336080 2641 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 84.00 380479., 2/27/2014 124799 STERLING WELDING COMPANY INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/2512014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2127/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380479 2/27/2014 124799 STERLING WELDING COMPANY INC. Continued... 3,225.00 15171,15170,15169,15168,15167 336177 THAW WATER 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION SERVICE 3,225.00 380480 2/2712014 102786 STOP TECH LTD 36.00 CORD REEL 336008 T002731 -IN 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 36.00 380481 2/27/2014 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 561.60 TRANSDUCERS 00001543 336049 28605 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 561.60 380482 2/27/2014 101016 STREICHERS 29.99 SWAT GEAR 336048 11072586 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 1,972.80 PRACTICE AMMO 336178 11074596 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,002.79 380483 2/27/2014 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 3/20/14 336307 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 380484 2/27/2014 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 206.57 BUMPER CAP 00005980 336050 1532480 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN -. 1,665.24 VEHICLE REPAIRS 336179 644318 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPE RATION GEN . 1,871.81 380485 2/27/2014 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,524.30 336250 805998 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3;524.30 380486" 2/27/2014 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 87.60 SHEARBOLTS 336180 3130446 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.60 380487 212712014 128347 TKO WINES INC. 159.00 336081 908720 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 288.00 336251 908735 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 447.00 380488 212712014 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY R55CKR2 LOGIS100 LIQUOR BAGS 336010 301627 -00 CITY OF EDINA PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 727.11 LIQUOR BAGS 336011 Council Check Register by GL 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 199.80- Council Check Register and Summary 336012 301740CI 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 2/27/2014 - 2/27/2014 CREDIT Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description 380488 212712014 336291 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Continued... 511.26 133.78 LENS, WELDING GAS 336051 10011222 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 133.78 380489 212712014 123649 TOWMASTER 119454 VINOCOPIA 2,598.46 336181 355610 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 0093215 -IN 2,598.46- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 336182 107990 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 336253 400.38 FENDER SECTIONS 00005007 336183 355758 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 400.38 0093218 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 380490 2/2712014 133172 TREBRON COMPANY INC. 0093219 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,020.00 AV SOFTWARE - 2ND PMT 336052 32462 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,020.00 380491 2/27/2014 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 1,236.85 CYLINDER 00005979 336184 LC00022341 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS . 1,236.85 380492 2127/2014 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 2,355.18 UNIFORMS 336053 013114 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 2,355.18 380493 2127/2014 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 117.72 PAGERS 336009 X0319246B 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 117.72 380494 2/27/2014 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 2/25/2014 11:18:11 Page - 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.40 LIQUOR BAGS 336010 301627 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 727.11 LIQUOR BAGS 336011 301251 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 199.80- CREDIT 336012 301740CI 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 111.00- CREDIT 336185 301877 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 167.18 UTENSILS, LINERS, SOAP 336291 301253 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 511.26 LIQUOR BAGS 336291 301253 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,139.15 380495 2127/2014 119454 VINOCOPIA 245.00 336252 0093215 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 237.05 336253 0093216 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 120.25 336254 0093218 -IN 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 336.75 336255 0093219 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 939.05 R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv. No Account No Subledger Account Description 380496 2/27/2014 119464 VINOCOPIA Continued... 380496 2/27/2014 133667 VIOLANTE, DOMINIC & KATHRYN 59.00 MUSEUM TRIP REFUND 336311 022514 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS 59.00 380497 2/27/2014 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,207.73 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336013 38769360 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 69.46 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336187 38484801 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 25.77 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336188 38506796 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,117.46 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336189 38599343 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 865.32 CONCESSION PRODUCT 336190 38823768 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 29.95- CREDIT 336191 38716926 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 6.50- CREDIT 336192 36716925 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3,249.29 380498 2/2712014 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 61.33 BRATS 336186 78693 5520.5510 - COST OF GOODS SOLD 61.33 380499 2/2712014 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 76.50 LIGHT BULBS 336193 15241021 -00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 76.50 380600 2/27/2014 133649 WEBER COMMUNITY PLANNING 3,500.00 GRANDVIEW DISTRICT PROJ 336194 010714 9234.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,500.00 380601 2127/2014 133660 WHITE BEAR RESCUE TRAINING CENTER 525.00 ICE RESCUE TRAINING 336195 W11353 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 525.00 380602 2/27/2014 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,288.50 336082 353782 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 92.00 336083 353503 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 958.85 336084 353931 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,227.80 336256 353930 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,567.15 380603 212712014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 452.24 336257 491412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2125/2014 11:18:11 Page - 21 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS ARENA CONCESSIONS YORK OCCUPANCY GRANDVIEW TIF DISTRICT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register and Summary 2/2712014 - 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380503 2/27/2014 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 2,668.54 336258 492287 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,276.88 336259 491467 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,397.66 380504 2127/2014 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGEWINNESOTA 147.45 336085 1080145543 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,792.76 336086 1080145541 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 71501.98 336087 1080145542 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,715.70 336088 1080145540 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 30.00- 336089 2080031490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 63.00- 336090 2080031493 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 70.00- 336091 2080031492 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 161.15- 336092 2080032354 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,949.05 336260 1080145537 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.15 336261 1080145538 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,098.19 336262 1080145539 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7,869.10 336263 1080145536 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 45.00- 336264 2080031491 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 113.15- 336265 2080032338 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30,641.08 380606 2/27/2014 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER INC 43.00 336093 1090182633 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,974.50 336094 1090182632 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 876.45 336095 1090181576 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,893.95 380506 2/27/2014 101726 XCEL ENERGY 158.35 51 -0010025256 -3 336014 401550129 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL_ 3,319.57 51- 6227619 -3 336015 401161266 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 8,197.65 51- 9603061 -0 336016 401366204 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.89 51- 5276505 -8 : 336017 401478189 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 8,048.98 51- 5605640 -1 336096 401559957 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 14,769.44 380607 2/27/2014 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 18,976.44 UNLEADED FUEL 00005976 336196 611311 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18,976.44 380608 2/27" ' 101672 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC R55CKR2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2125/2014 11:18:11 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register and Summary 2/27/2014 — 2/27/2014 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 380508 2/2712014 101672 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC Continued... 416.60 SPRING GUIDES, PIVOTS 336197 0147982 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 839.10 HYDRA FILTER KIT, TOW BAR ASSY 336292 0147963 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,255.70 380609 212712014 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 ENTERTAINMENT 3/2/14 336097 022014 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 437,696.90 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 437,696.90 Total Payments 437,696.90 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 2/25/2014 11:18:16 Council Check Summary Page- 1 2/27/2014 - 2127/2014 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 135,812.90 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 53,483.17 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,592.33 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 10,237.44 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 24.69 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,199.76 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 9,911.54 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,355.55 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,475.01 05800 LIQUOR FUND 145,662.47 05900 UTILITY FUND 43,780.11 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 50.00 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 20,442.06 09234 GRANDVIEWTIF DISTRICT 3,500.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 6,169.87 Report Totals 437,696.90 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poligies nd procedurete ! - o • _ _ e ia� �r.G /JIEGI,.i Vf . - 4ana„ To: Mayor and Council From: Patty McGrath General Manager - Edinborough Park Date: March 4, 2014 A, rO,c� Le. O �,y Agenda Item #: IV.C. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Emergency Request for Purchase — Premium Efficiency Boiler Lochinvar KBX400, Edinborough Park Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 19, 2014 Company: Horwitz NSI Daikin Applied Gilbert Mechanical Recommended Quote or Bid: Horwitz NSI - Bid or Expiration Date: Amount of Quote or Bid: $34.332 $42,540 Unable to meet urgent timeline General Information: Edinborough Park replaced the existing pool heater in September 2013 after it had met its life expectancy of 6 -7 years and had failed. The Lochivar Energy Rite model 402 was replaced by -the same model. Since that time, four heat exchangers have failed. Each time there was an operational issue with the heater, we contacted the mechanical contractor that installed it, as we do not do any service or maintenance on this unit ourselves. Initially, the mechanical contractor did not have a definitive explanation for the failures and continued to work with the manufacturer on a solution. We did follow their recommendations to install additional equipment to provide a check/balance system. Ultimately that did not correct the problem. Eventually, the mechanical contractor discovered that the pool heater that was installed in September; and subsequent heat exchangers, required the incoming water temperature to be 140 degrees. Our water temperature was approximately 82 degrees. The pool temperature is currently 72 degrees which is far below the average temperature of 82. Replacement of the pool heater is essential to the financial turnaround that is in progress at Edinborough Park. It directly impacts several user groups including the Edina Swim Club, Community Education, hotel guests and Edinborough Pool & Track Members. It is crucial that we have a pool heater that is reliable so we meet the needs and expectations of all user groups. The recommended replacement boiler is a 2014 Lochivar KBX400. This boiler is specifically designed to operate with low return water temperatures associated with pool heating systems. This heater has a closed loop condensing boiler, so the pool water will never come into contact with the boiler itself. The unit will City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Page IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER run at about'95% efficiency. There]s' a 10 year warranty, and a one year preventative maintenance program. We will also receive a $2,700 energy rebate. F` The immediate response by Horwitz NSI to this urgent situation was outstanding. Their reputation and level of customer service, as well as the warranty they are providing, ensure efficient and consistent operations of the pool heater. City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St Edina, MN 55424 To: Mayor and Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation' Director Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Toro 4500 Mower, Braemar Golf Course Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 2/10/14 Company: MTI Distributing Recommended Quote or Bid: MTI Distributing o e Agenda Item #: IV.D. The Recommended Bid is 19 Within Budget NotWithin Budget Bid or Expiration Date: 3/15/14 Amount of Quote or Bid: $47,447.82 General Information: This request for purchase is for a Toro 4500 -D rough mower. This model is a unique design that uses a rotary style deck that allows us to cut uneven turf grasses without scalping. The width of the cut is 109" and it can mow 6:5 acres per hour. We own three machines in this size that we use at Braemar Golf Course to mow the large areas of rough. The mower will be purchased through National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance Company (National IPA) which is a nationwide purchasing cooperative designed to be a procurement resource for local and state government agencies, school districts, and non - profits. National IPA's agreement does not require any formal contract and has been reviewed by Roger Knutson, City Attorney. The price is broken down as follows: (1) Toro 4500 -D rough mower $54,895.62 Trade 2009 Toro rough mower - $10,500.00 Sales Tax $3,052.20 Total $47,447.82 In 2014, $155,000 is budgeted for maintenance equipment replacement. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 r � oll` ,eaa To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV.E. The Recommended Bid is From: Ann Kattreh ❑x Within Budget Parks & Recreation Director ❑ NotWithin Budget Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Request for Purchase — Toro 3500 Mower, Braemar Golf Course Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 2/10/14 Company: MTI Distributing Recommended Quote or Bid: MTI Distributing. Bid or Expiration Date: 3/15/14 Amount of Quote or Bid: $25,073.18 General Information: This request for purchase is for a Toro 3500 -D rough mower. This model is a unique design that uses a rotary style deck that allows us to cut uneven turf grasses without scalping. The width of the cut is 68" and it can mow 3.5 acres per hour. The golf course owns three similar machines in this size used often on the Braemar Golf Course to mow the areas of rough around the greens and tees. This is a critical piece of equipment for the course. The mower will be purchased through National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance Company (National IPA) which is a nationwide purchasing cooperative designed to be a procurement resource for local and state government agencies,, school districts, and non - profits. National IPA's agreement does not require any formal contract and has been reviewed by Roger Knutson, City Attorney. Price breakdown: (1) Toro 3500 -D rough mower $29,460.29 Trade 2009 Toro rough mower - $6,000.00 Sales Tax 1$ .612.89 Total $25,073.18 The 2014 budget for maintenance equipment replacement for golf operations is $155,000. City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 w9�N�1r� FOR Q ► OF 1 111 ORDER t>-4 Z o ItltlH To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item #: IV.F The Recommended Bid is From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget Date: 3/04/14 Subject: Request For Purchase — Asphalt and Concrete Crushing — Public Works Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Expiration Date: 2/14/14 4/1/14 Company: Jay Johnson Construction Intex Corporation Semple Recycling & Crushing Recommended Quote or Bid: Jay Johnson Construction Amount of Quote or Bid: $3.25 per ton $3.55 per ton + $7,000 mobilization $3.70 per ton + $3,500 mobilization General Information: This purchase is for the crushing and recycling of our concrete and blacktop material as generated by the Public Works Department, which includes utilities, streets, and park maintenance division activities. Staff will utilize this material to build City construction projects to help reduce the costs of those projects. An example of this material use was the trail construction activity that was completed last summer between Kellogg and Parklawn. This type of recycling program has been completed over the past 14 -16 years and was last completed in May of 2011 for a cost of.,$3.16 per ton. Three quotes were received for this work and it will be funded by the streets, utilities and parks division operating budgets. Staff has calculated and is asking for approval for a not to exceed quantity of 15,000 tons. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Laura Adler Water Resources Coordinator Date: March 4, 2014 h 91N��1 'e t4 Cn �y �co"Po A'��� • mea Agenda Item #: IV. G. The Recommended Bid is ® Within Budget ❑ NotWithin Budget Subject: Request for Purchase — Aquatic Vegetation Management, Contract No. ENG 14 -2NB Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: February 18, 2014 Company: 1. Lake Management, Inc. 2. Lake Restoration, Inc. 3. Lake Improvement Consulting, LLC Recommended Quote or Bid: Lake Management, Inc. General Information: Bid or Expiration Date: May 18, 2014 Amount of Quote or Bid: 1. $31,675.00 2. $33,187.97 3. $34,750.00 $31,675.00 The City of Edina provides aquatic vegetation management for 40 lakes within the city. Staff has included the aquatic vegetation management provided for Melody Lake, which was previously quoted separately. The Engineering Department has requested quotes for the herbicidal treatment of these lakes, as well as DNR permitting and resident communication. The quote is designed to provide the same level of service as past years and the costs are similar to last year. Staff recommends awarding the bid to Lake Management, Inc. 1 \ED- NT81EngPubWkAPIMCENTRAL SVMENG DIVAPROJECTSICONTRACTS120141ENG 142NB Aquatic Vegetation Mgmt & AentlonlAquadc Vegetation Control City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 7REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • ,�CORPORf'��O • teBB To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. H. From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Action IK Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Waiver of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement for 7101 France Ave., Rue de France Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to sign attached Waiver of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement. Information / Background: The Hazelton Road Improvement Project (Project) was ordered by City Council on June 4, 2013. With the delay of the France Avenue Intersection Enhancements Project until 2014 due to higher than expected bids in 2013, we did not go out for bids during 2013 for the Project. We are scheduled to open bids in early April with an anticipated award at the April 22 City Council meeting. The feasibility study showed a schematic of a standard 4 access point roundabout. This design required the Rue de France and Guitar Center properties to agree on a cross - access easement. This would allow patrons of each business to cross the other's property to enter and exit the properties. They were unable to come to an agreement on a cross - access easement. Staff developed an alternate roundabout design with 5 access points that would provide a separate access point for each of the properties. In this design Rue de France and Guitar Center would lose 2 and 3 parking spaces, respectively. The original' design had each losing I and 8 spaces, for a total of 9 parking spaces. As stated in the feasibility report, "permanent right -or -way and temporary easements will be needed from the Rue de France, Guitar Center, Szechaun Star, and Byerly's. It is anticipated all right -of -way needed will be donated by the adjacent properties ". Please note that the Szechaun Star property will soon be the Think Bank location. As part of the feasibility study, staff looked at two options, a traffic light and a roundabout. In either case, easements were necessary. Byerly's has donated the permanent easements and the documentation is complete. Think Bank is required to provide the easements by Item 6 of Section 3 of approved Resolution 2013-118. We continue negotiations with the Guitar Center property owners. The Guitar Center property changed ownership last fall. The previous property owner did not discuss the project with the new owners at the time of the City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 purchase. Preliminary discussions with them have yielded a verbal agreement to the layout but no closure to the easement discussion. Rue de France is not willing to donate the permanent easements needed to construct these improvements. By signing this agreement, the City is granted the right to enter onto the easement area for purposes of construction activities from May I to November 30, 2014. This will ensure the project is not delayed due to negotiations with Rue de France concerning the easements. The City is required to determine the fair market value of the property and make an offer to the owner to purchase the easement areas. If a direct purchase cannot be reached between the parties, condemnation proceedings will be initiated on May 1, 2014. It is the city attorney's opinion that we cannot assess the cost of these easements back to the property owner. Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to sign attached Waiver of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement. Attachments: Waiver of Trespass /Right of Entry Agreement Revised Roundabout Design Graphics G:U WICENTRAL SVCS%ENG DMPROJECMCONTRACTM013XENG 13 -22 Hazelton Rd Impr1ADMIN%M1Satem IV xx Hazelton Rd Rightof- Entry.doac WAIVER OF TRESPASS/RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT (RUE DE FRANCE) THE UNDERSIGNED, Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ( "Owner "), owner of certain land in the City of Edina, located at 7101 France Avenue South and legally described as Lot 5, Block 1, Yorktown ( "Subject Property "), who is the sole entity with a right to grant entry to the affected property, does hereby consent and grant unto the City of Edina ( "City "), its agents and contractors, the right to enter upon and commence construction and all activities required in connection therewith, of the Hazelton Road Improvement Project (ENG 13 -22 and BA 417) over, on, across and through only that part of the property legally described on attached Exhibit A and depicted on attached Exhibit B as the Easement Area. This Right of Entry does not grant to the City or its agents or assigns any easement rights, but is intended to grant to the City and its agents and contractors only the right to enter onto the Easement Area for the purposes described herein. This Right of Entry shall be for a time period commencing May 1, 2014 and terminating on November 30, 2014. It is further understood that this Agreement does not constitute a waiver on behalf of the owner or persons of interest in the Subject Property to any claim for compensation or damages for the acquisition by the City of a temporary and permanent easement over the described property for the purposes of the public improvements herein described. Additional terms and conditions: (1) Subject to the statutory liability limits in Minn. Stat. Ch. 466, the City agrees to indemnify and hold Owner harmless from any and all harms or damage to persons or property arising out of the use of the Easement Area by the City or its employees, contractors, agents and representatives. (2) There will be access to the Subject Property at all times from at least one entry point. City will make its best effort to minimize the temporary closure of any entry points. (3) City will obtain an appraisal of the fair market value of the property rights it seeks to acquire from Owner, provide Owner with a copy of the appraisal, make an offer to Owner to purchase the property, and place the property into condemnation proceedings in the event that a direct purchase cannot be reached between the parties. (4) If condemmation proceedings are initiated, the date of take will be May 1, 2014. (5) The use of the Easement Area shall be subject to the following restrictions: 1747570 a) the City will not allow the Easement Area to be used as a "staging" area for the overall project; b) large const action vehicles will be present on the Easement Area, if at all, for the shortest duration possible and only while constriction is taking place in the Easement Area; and c) the Easement Area will not be used for general parking purposes by any persons involved in the Project or for any other general use during the course of the Project. Dated this day of , 2014. PROPERTY OWNER: SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA By: Its: By: Its: CITY: CITY OF EDINA By: James B. Hovland, Mayor 174757v1 Scott H. Neal, City Manager A EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL 18 (SUN LIFE) A permanent easement for roadway, sidewalk, drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 5, Block 1, Yorktown as Is on file and of record In the Office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 5, thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 37 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line thereof, 311.77 feet to the highway easement line as described in Document Number 2189613; thence North 86 degrees 23 minutes 32 seconds West, along said highway easement line, 71.05 feet; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, 63.71 feet; thence easterly along a tangential curve, concave to the north, 55.09 feet, having a radius of 973.00 feet and a central angle of 03 degrees 14 minutes 39 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds East, tangent to last describe curve, 145.97 feet; thence northeasterly along a tangential curve, concave the northwest, 88.40 feet, having a radius of 189.00 feet and a central angle of 26 degrees 47 minutes 56 seconds to a point of reverse curve; thence northeasterly along said reverse curve, 33.91 feet, having a radius of 78.00 feet and a central angel of 24 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds to the east line of said Lot 5; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds East, along said east line, 30.17 feet to the point of beginning. AND A temporary construction easement over, under and across that part of said Lot 5 described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 5, thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 37 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line thereof, 311.77 feet to the highway easement line as described In Document Number 2189613; thence North 86 degrees 23 minutes 32 seconds West, along said highway easement line, 71.05 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be hereinafter described; thence North 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, 63.71 feet; thence easterly along a tangential curve; concave to the north, 55.09 feet, having a radius of 973.00 feet and a central angle of 03 degrees 14 minutes 39 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 57 minutes 15 seconds East, tangent to last describe curve; 145.97 feet; thence northeasterly along a tangential curve, concave the northwest, 88.40 feet, having a radius of 189.00 feet and a central angle of 26 degrees 47 minutes 56 seconds to a point of reverse curve; thence northeasterly along said reverse curve, 33.91 feet, having a radius of 78.00 feet and a central angel of 24 degrees 54 minutes 44 seconds to the east line of said Lot 5; thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds West, along said east fine, 14.43 feet; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 06 seconds West, 114.87 feet; thence South 00 degrees 11 minutes 54 seconds East, 26.47 feet; thence South 89 degrees 48 minutes 06 seconds West, 272.67 feet; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds East, 13.13 feet to said highway easement line, thence South 86 degrees 23 minutes 32 seconds East, along said line, 4.92 feet to the point of beginning. 0 0 m N Y 0 0 0 x NI -r.% PARCEL 3 o so 100 °TF;5y = PROPOSED PERMANENT ROADWAY, SIDEWALK AND DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AREA = 2,272 sq fl u MEPROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AREA= 7,614 sq fl 701X.7i'monue South, Suite 300 France Avenue Improvements REVISEDDATo, 1686 Minneapolis, MN 55418 W �� 0 ' 4 �tay. wwsbeng.com Easement Parcel Sketch N ,.. ]63511a;WFaz)63511•UW City of Edina, Minnesota �, �,,, o „�, �" Parcel No. 18 INFRASTRUCTURE I ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CONSTRUC noN ° ` � Exhibit B ar Center Parkin t Lo 4s=, ells fib "0 "IP-PRO Pi OL !,Ppr)p V�Al, PRO = 2676 Hazelton Road City of Edina, Minnesota Guitar Center Exhibit Y 5 e Hazelton Road City of Edina, Minnesota t F 4 1 ' 7 ii sr Rue De France Parking Net Loss= 2 stalls V_ I T' ; ". PROP. R/VV PROP. RM = 2272 SF } RZQP. T/ 714 SF I AN _'#tr - •1�4- ILMtI AX.- 4 -- _- - r- f. Ii MHl Z� •'T kip, lot 4 41 Rue De France Exhibit x" tit >4. �0 ; •,'�rfU l po" r1�, I BOB To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: IV. I. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -Sale, Sunday Sale, Wine and Beer Liquor License Renewals Action Requested: Council approve the Club On -Sale, On -Sale Intoxicating, Sunday Sale, Wine and _Beer Liquor License renewals as presented for the period beginning April I, 2014 and ending March 31, 2015. Information / Background: Applications for renewal of On -Sale Intoxicating, Club On -sale, Sunday On -Sale, Wine On -Sale, Beer On -Sale and Beer Off -Sale Liquor Licenses for the establishments listed below. All applications have been reviewed by the Edina Police Department and renewals are recommended per the attached memo. The applicants. have submitted all necessary paperwork in accordance with the City's.liquor ordinance and State Statutes, and have paid their license fees. In the case of the applicants for both wine and beer licenses, statute allows the establishments to also sell strong beer in their restaurants. Edina's renewal date is April 1, 2014. Once the Council approves the renewals, staff will forward all necessary documentation to the Minnesota Liquor Control for state approval. Following is a listing of requested renewals by category: On -Sale Intoxicating & Sunday Sale Big Bowl Cocina Del Barrio Crave Restaurant Eden Avenue Grill Edina Grill Restaurant Lake Shore Grill McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant Mozza Mia Nakomori Japanese Bistro P.F. Chang's Bistro Pinstripes, Inc. Pittsburgh Blue Raku Inc. Rojo.Mexican Grill Romano's Macaroni Grill Ruby Tuesday Salut Bar Americain Tavern On France The Cheesecake Factory Westin Edina Galleria Club & Sunday Sale Edina Country Club Interlachen Country Club City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 On -Sale Wine and On -Sale 3.2 Beer Beaujo's Biryani Chipotle Mexican Grill Cooks of Crocus Hill D'Amico & Sons Good Earth Restaurant Makers Cafe 1 Hello Pizza On- Sale'3.2 Licenses: Chuck•E. Cheese's Davanni's Pizza /Hoagies Off -Sale 3.2 Licenses: Cub Foods DB Convenience LLC (Edina Market & Deli) Holiday Stationstore #217 Attachments: Sgt. Tim Olson's Memo _ .. ... ...:ate. I Marriott Residence Inn Noodles & Company People's Organic Coffee /Wine Galleria Cafe Red Savoy Pizza Rice Paper Asian Fusion Restaurant Smash Burger TJ's of Edina Restaurant Jerry's_Foods _ Speedway SuperAmerica LLC i► Edina Police Department Memo To: Chief Dave Nelson yv es % 37 From: Sergeant Tim OI /,, Date: February 19, 2014 Re: Liquor License Renewals Background checks have been completed for the 2014 -2015 licensing period for the following liquor licenses: On -Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale, Wine and 3.2 Beer On -Sale, 3.2 Beer On -Sale, 3.2 Beer Off - Sale, and Club On -Sale and Sunday Sale The following restaurants, stores, and country clubs comply with City code. An unqualified recommendation for approval of these renewal applications is warranted. ON -SALE INTOXICATING AND SUNDAY SALE • Big Bowl • Cocina Del Barrio • Crave Restaurant • Eden Avenue Grill • Edina Grill Restaurant • Lake Shore Grill • McCormick & Schmick's • Mazza Mia • Nakamori Japanese Bistro • P.F. Chang's China Bistro • Pinstripes • Pittsburg Blue • Raku Inc. • Rojo Mexican Grill • Romano's Macaroni Grill • Ruby Tuesday • Salut Bar Americain • Tavern on France ■ The Cheesecake Factory ■ Westin Edina Galleria • Page 1 WINE AND 3.2 BEER ON -SALE • Beauj6ls • Biryani • Chipotle Mexican Grill • Cooks of Crocus Hill • D'Amico & Sons • Good Earth Restaurant • Hello Pizza • Makers Cafe 1 • Marriott Residence Inn • Noodles & Company • Peoples Organic Coffee and Wine Cafe • Red's Savoy Pizza • Rice Paper • Smash Burger • Vs of Edina BEER 3.2 ON -SALE • Chuck E. Cheese • Davanni's Pizza/Hoagie BEER 3.2 OFF -SALE • Cub Foods • DB Convenience LLC (Edina Market and Deli) • Holiday Station store #217 • Jerry Foods • Speedway Superamerica, LLC CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY SALE • Edina Country Club • Interlachen Country Club • Page 2 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Scott H. Neal, City Manager Date: March 4, 2014 • ,��nRPOF7���O • 18AB Agenda Item #: IV. J. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: City Council Members Attendance at National League of Cities Conference Action Requested: Motion to authorize City Council Members to attend the 2014 Congressional Cities Conference of the National League of Cities in Washington, DC Information / Background: The City of Edina recognizes that its elected official may at times receive value from traveling out of the state for workshops, conferences, events and other assignments. The City Council adopted a policy to regulate out -of -state travel by elected officials on December 6, 2005. The policy requires staff to estimate the cost of the out -of -state travel and to have the Council approve the out -of- travel in advance of the travel. The action incorporated into the proposed motion is to authorize the travel of Council Members Bennett, Brindle and Sprague to attend the 2014 Congressional Cities Conference of the National League of Cities in Washington, DC on March 9 -12. In addition to the conference training sessions, Council Members will also meet with Edina's elected representatives and /or their respective staffs to discuss issues of special concern to the City. The estimated cost of the travel, lodging and conference costs is $2,000 /Council Member. Recommendation: The National League of Cities is widely recognized as the preeminent professional association for elected municipal officials. The Congressional Cities Conference represents a valuable opportunity for learning and professional development for Members of our City Council. The estimated cost is a good value for the City, especially considering that Council Members take unpaid time away from work and from their families to attend. I strongly recommend the City Council approve the requested motion. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 r � R , POIRT' / RECOMMENDATIONS oil T ' �DRBPdOB +ry To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VI.A. From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director /fiction ❑x Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: _ PUBLIC HEARING — Subdivision, 6304 & 6312 Warren Avenue for Homestead Partners LLC. Resolution No. 2014 -25. Action Requested: Adopt the attached resolution. Information / Background: Homestead Partners LLC is proposing to subdivide the properties at 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue into three lots. The existing two homes would be torn down, and three new homes built on the new lots. The proposal meets all minimum lot size requirements. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,446 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 74.4. (See attached median calculations dated 2- 12 -14.) Lots 1 & 2 would gain access off of 63rd Street and Lot 3 would gain access off of Warren Avenue. Planning.Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff memo dated February 12, 2014. The Planning Commission added a condition that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan that depicts trees saved, removed and replaced, with special care give to trees in the northeast corner of the. site. The applicant has submitted .a revised landscape plan. A total of 16 trees would be removed, and 13 — six foot tall Black Hills Spruce, and 20 = six foot tall Techny Arborvitae would be planted. With the revised utility plan, the trees in the northeast corner of the site would be saved. ATTACHMENTS: o Resolution No. 2014 -25 • Revised Plans • Planning Commission Minutes, February 12,2014 - `__0 Planning- Commission staff report dated-February 12, 2014 City of Edina 4801 W. 50`h St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-24 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AT 6304 AND 6312 WARREN AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Homestead Partners LLC is proposing to subdivide the properties at 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue into three lots. 1.02 The existing homes and detached structures would all be removed. 1.03 Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,446 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 74.4. All three meet the above medians. 1.04 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: See attached 1.05 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: Lots 1, 2 and 3,'Block 1 Wyman Place 1.06 The proposed subdivision meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. 1.07 On February 12, 2014, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff memo dated February 12, 2014. The Planning Commission added a condition that the applicant submit a revised landscape plan that depicts trees saved, removed and replaced, with special care give to trees in the northeast corner of the site. 1.08 The applicant submitted a revised landscape plan. A total of 16 trees would be removed, and 13 - six foot tall Black Hills Spruce, and 20 - six foot tall Techny Arborvitae would be planted. With the revised utility plan, the trees in the northeast corner of the site would be saved. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov a 952- 927 -8861 • Fax 952 - 826 -0390 RESOLUTION NO. 2014-25 Page Two Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets all the required standards and ordinances for a subdivision. 2. The applicant is proposing to'provide year round . screening for the existing homes to the west and south with'a row of 13,..six- foot tall Black Hills Spruce and 20 six-foot tall Techny Arborvitae along the south and west lot lines. 3. MnDOT has expressed a willingness to allow access to 63rd Street. 4. The applicant revised the utility plan to save additional trees in the northeast corner of the site. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City.of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat for the proposed subdivision of 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final.plat. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require. revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. Curb -cut permits must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A, grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer is required for each building permit. d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. 4. Final. site development shall be consistent with preliminary plat, landscape plan, drainage plan, and utility plan date.stamped 2- 24 -14. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-25 Page Two Adopted this _ day of 2014. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting o.f ,.2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of ; 2014. City Clerk �pqr i EE P gg P � 4 q p gP E P P g 11ill Pliq 1 01 41 Ill 1 J i€ R � i g �i 11il ;1 11 H11 o g R 1 It s���s' a 1119 � € 11 pig 11 . p � E& � IqR MITI 811 1� Egli IQ 4 RUM e r S n i I� eFa MEMO I � 00 00 �°� '1 II 111.E r "- 1!a�tllww� �cRRw�i�2JZ��� WARREN AVE 1 I E Ro vo i 9+ e - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC -. 525 15th Avenue S. Hopkins, MN 55343 - WYMAN PLACE Edina, Minnesota Cry Carlson J McCain [RNn UW& • 0xz¢ G • suRvMG 8 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 76-089 -7900 Fax: 763-489 -7959 I � 00 00 �°� '1 II \� . O i .' I O ~ • O"O Y t• / 11 \• - Ili \ 1: \' \ € o \ �o I ••, rT;;;71 \ . \I � \ k it \�\ 111.E r "- 1!a�tllww� �cRRw�i�2JZ��� WARREN AVE 1 I E Ro vo i 9+ e - PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC -. 525 15th Avenue S. Hopkins, MN 55343 - WYMAN PLACE Edina, Minnesota Cry Carlson J McCain [RNn UW& • 0xz¢ G • suRvMG 8 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 76-089 -7900 Fax: 763-489 -7959 �F' iolt C :a :xi• I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i d a V m� �g H N 66666 AE4 d N e �px R N10 R., ..6-I=1 7-1 1 2IND i ��vj i ivi v a a a a a a \�� � ® I I I I I I sQ D oem wmn43 o,�� N e o • • s ge �i '�. �, y� � a � ��1 1� iiiiiiaiiiiii$iiii�3i e a e E 5¢ a s a e e €f !x FIN "q 6 5 � 6 � ®i® „ _ rpn ¢Df-°• $P �( 9 ` aaPppS!` A� 3 g i� I I N 4. rra4 iz a m o zz m mu m O 0 m f� �Y�VJ \LJ) V�V 1! � HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC PRELIMINARY PLAT & EXISTING CONDITIONS Carlson /��Cain W� G I� F�! I rill, i lot P "iIneAMlneta 525 15th Avenue S. Hopkins, MN 55343 PLACE �• Mc( 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Uno Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 763 -489 -7900 Fax: 763-489 -7959 �Y�VJ \LJ) V�V REMOVE & REPLACE EX STREET SECTION IN KIND CONNECT TO EX IDi I I CORE URXL & INSTALL WATER TIGHT SEAL (REFORM MV.) EX INV 838.5 (FIELD VERIFY) ; �r � t 1 BITUMINOUS (TYP.) 63R0 SEES �5T i ;ry EIOSTING SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TIP.) LOCATIONS SHOWN PER CITY AS —EMLTS. � - SIZE PLAN I. EL4J0 EleSlele PROPOiE3D 0 � g B eIN 75PLE FAMILY LOTS 75 MINIMUM WIDTH m Irn a�.a me rm aia.ov Pp-- mum tort. mrt �amny ]f ,cwt 41eAOt M lVr�1 �1'm 1tR�[ � � BENCHMARKS moo oaP m x ^••, eaalEmlm �x wao • WARNINGI IDlolveAleys below. Call before you dig. I jAUC�' i i I I I I I I I 1 ti I i yk i la II I i RELT. "'� I USE EX )i SERVICE / I 1 OVERHEAD I i I o I I I I I ELECTRIC I I I I 1 i ;ry EIOSTING SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TIP.) LOCATIONS SHOWN PER CITY AS —EMLTS. � - SIZE PLAN I. EL4J0 EleSlele PROPOiE3D 0 � g B eIN 75PLE FAMILY LOTS 75 MINIMUM WIDTH m Irn a�.a me rm aia.ov Pp-- mum tort. mrt �amny ]f ,cwt 41eAOt M lVr�1 �1'm 1tR�[ � � BENCHMARKS moo oaP m x ^••, eaalEmlm �x wao • WARNINGI IDlolveAleys below. Call before you dig. `n Ig J P 00 arc se � o q9 o 0 c [ S . oc o J - \� ^-d' IF I E FR n'V , - cu Ridae d 5 M 9R�gg A 6 V HIM I 'III v r Z OR e = v S 9& 0 O 0 �E �� vo P. I 3 fljll�l H Il�i'iiiiil �I III Iltlluu;;i� 5 � ,B II •�I ��I�I �Po Fu N —cis �U =1 � x a o- C 0 s - R _ 2w m� s ° 500 FT. NEIGHBORHOO EXHIBIT fbr: 0 Carlson 6e��9gg s HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC _ s_ McCain WYMAN PLACE ENVIRONMENTAL • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING 24B A N � $ pollo Dr, Suite 100, Uno Lakes, MN 55014 y 93 Edina, Minnesota Phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763 -489 -7959 `1�i tl WiUSCtlNS VIN FiL 'Fd a= � m m 0 s - R _ 2w m� s ° 500 FT. NEIGHBORHOO EXHIBIT fbr: 0 Carlson 6e��9gg s HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC _ s_ McCain WYMAN PLACE ENVIRONMENTAL • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING 24B A N � $ pollo Dr, Suite 100, Uno Lakes, MN 55014 y 93 Edina, Minnesota Phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763 -489 -7959 ii IE2�klF2itilRAUiR 1520102R0Ra01 e� ens "szses�ssYg.������'- r ^'s ".0 f FFF it ILI N A $ - i ° 1 l_ 'j'! 6a;=�s .1 g 500 FT. NEIGHBORHOOD EXHIBIT for: (� Carlson ff� s 1Q ' HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC • McCain v g 3� g ENVIRONYENTAI • ENGMEERMC • SUR4E1'ING N$ %66¢y a WYMAN PLACE 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino lakes, MN 55014 j Edina, Minnesota Phone: 763- 489 -7900 Fax: 763 -489 -7959 nv...v>e, - •r.m•>er - w...:war.um er+. eema vvrpwp torn Commissions Fischer asked Planner Aaker how a- resident and /or builder is alerts to Code changes. Planner Aaker sa meeting regularly with staff and keeping up with the Sun Cu ent helps; otherwise one wouldn't know. Commissioner Grabiel sa% this is a sensitive situation because the perty next door is a through lot. Commissioner Scherer asked nner Aaker to clarify the var' ce request. Planner Aaker explained that the variance requested is on for the garage, adding t applicant is requesting a 4.6 -foot setback from the north property line to inc se their undersi garage. Aaker further explained that the 2nd story addition conforms to Code and uld be buil . The variance has no bearing on the 2nd floor addition. Commissioner Carr acknowledged the reg6nt angel to the Code created this situation; however, she doesn't believe there is a "grace -perio 'for com 'ance. Carr stated she cannot support the variance as presented. Commissioner Forrest asked anner Aaker what she wo Id consider a functioning two -stall garage: Planner Aaker explained t5ld currently the Code has no se tandards for garage size; however, 20 -feet is the smal/width ould recommend for two stall gara She added on the building plans she reviews twre usually between 22 =24 feet wide; is undersized. Commissiohe is sympathetic; however with the recen Code changes she cannot support the reaues Xfiissioner Forrest said to her the difficulty in this is that the City of Ecl�a requires two stall garages questioned if the existing garage "really" is a two stall garage. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Carr seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer. Nays; Schroeder, Potts, Fischer Carr, Forrest, Grabiel, Platteter. Motion failed. C. Subdivision. Homestead Partners, 6304 and 6312 Warren Ave., Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission Homestead Partners LLC is proposing to subdivide the _ properties at 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue into three lots. He noted the existing two homes would be torn down, and replaced with three new homes. Continuing, Teague pointed out the proposed subdivision meets all of Edina's Zoning Ordinance requirements, and staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed three lot subdivision of 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue for Homestead Partners based on the following findings: the proposal meets all the required standards and ordinances for a subdivision and the applicant is proposing to provide year round screening for the existing homes to the west and south with a row of 21six -foot tall Black Hills Spruce and 32 six -foot tall Techy Arborvitae_ along the south and west lot lines. The final finding is that MnDOT has expressed a willingness to allow access to 63`d Street Concluding, Teague stated staff also recommends approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 3. Sewer line must be extended in the street, not in the front yard of the private property. Water connections shall be made directly from the street. 4. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be revised on the Final Plat to reflect removing the sewer and water lines from the front yards of the three Lots. The easement along the front lot lines (63rd Street) shall be 10 feet. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. Curb -cut permits must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer is required for each building permit. d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. Page 6 of 14 Appearing for the Applicant Stephen Bona Discussion Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Teague if the east lot would require variances. Planner Teague responded no variances from the subdivision ordinance are required for that lot; or any of the lots. Continuing, Platteter asked why the exclusion of homes across the highway. Planner Teague explained a conscious decision was made exempting lots on the other side of highways 100 and 169. Teague said those in the, opinion of the Council those highways clearly separated neighborhoods. Platteter also asked if the grading plan submitted with the application was adequate. Teague responded in the affirmative. He also noted that each lot would be individually reviewed for grading at the time of building permit review to ensure compliance with the plat. Commissioner Grabiel said to him the request was reasonable; but indicated a small concern with the driveway on Lot I that accesses 63,d Street near the Wyman intersection. Planner Teague said the City Engineer didn't see that as an issue. Commissioner Fischer said the driveway placement for Lot I really isn't unusual and more common than one thinks. He added there are similar conditions in his neighborhood. Commissioner Potts suggested if the presented arrangement isn't acceptable it may be possible to readjust the lots lines to minimize any negative perceptions if so desired. Commissioner Forrest asked if the Commission is recommending to the City Council. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Scherer asked who pays for the sewer and water hookups. Planner Teague responded the developer is responsible for fees accrued. Commissioner Carr recommended that the developer save as many trees as possible. Applicant Presentation. Mr. Bona, Homestead Partners, informed the Commission that a neighborhood meeting was held andhe spoke with most of the immediate: neighbors: and at that time landscaping and screening options were discussed and agreed to be implemented. Bona said that in his opinion drainage would be improved because of the addition of a swale. Bona also indicated that all conditions established for approval would be met. Concluding, Bona said as many trees as possible would remain along the perimeter of the property. Commissioner Forrest said she has a concern with the existing trees and wants every effort made to preserve as many trees along the perimeter of the property as mentioned. Continuing, Forrest commented on the landscaping plan that included evergreens and asked if there was a particular reason Page 7 of 14: for choosing evergreens. Mr. Bona responded that evergreens are an excellent tree to use for screening. Commissioner Platteter asked the applicant to do the best he can in retaining and maintaining the existing vegetation. He pointed out it is also in the best interest of the developer to retain as much vegetation as possible including the additional landscaping measures to ensure privacy and screening. Chair Platteter opened the public hearing Public Testimony Kathleen Shoemaker, 6316 Warren Avenue said the focus of her concerns is adequate screening of the common lot line; drainage, construction noise and vehicle traffic during the construction process. Shoemaker also noted that a huge tree is.breaking up her driveway, adding she would like that also looked at. Chair Platteter informed Ms. Shoemaker that the City now as a construction maintenance management plan code with an enforcement officer, Cindy Larson. Any issues during the construction process can be addressed through her. Mr. Bona responded to Ms. Shoemakers comment on drainage explaining that a drainage swale would be developed that should address any drainage issues. -Bona also asked Ms. Shoemaker to contact him about the tree and driveway issue she mentioned. Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none; Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion and Motion Commissioner Carr stated that she believes the plan as presented to include certain tweaks is reasonable and she can support it. Commissioner Carr moved subdivision approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Carr said she would like included as an additional condition that the applicant submit a landscaping plan to Council that depicts trees saved, removed and replaced. Special care should be given to the trees in .the northeast corner of the site. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. A discussion ensued on trees with Commissioners observing the majority of the trees on this property are Ash; which in the proposed tree ordinance is considered removable. While acknowledging that. point the Commission indicated they want assurances that trees whenever possible would be retained and additional landscaping would be planted to screen neighbors as indicated. Page 8 of 14 Mr. Bona agreed to do his best, adding he wants the Commission to know that trees would be removed to accommodate the utility services, building pads and driveways; however, a landscaping plan and /or list would be submitted for City Council review as requested by the Commission. VII. RE TS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. TIF Resolution — ntagon Park Proposal Consistency ' h the Comprehensive Plan Commissioner Fischerrecused himse from the vote; explaini a works with the City on Tax Increment Financing. Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if the 'Co ion is being asked to specify that the intent of the Pentagon Park Proposal/TIF District is consiste a the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague_ responded in the affirmative. Bill Neuendorf addressed the Co fission explaining the City h hired Nick Anhoff of Ehlers & Associates to help create a Pe gon Park Tax Increment Financing 'strict. Motion Commissione Grabiel moved to adopt the Resolution finding that propo d TIF Plan and modificatio s to the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plans for development and red elopment of the City. Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B. Sket Plan Review — 5108 Edina Industrial Boulevard, i Planner Teague reminded the mmission Frauensh presented a redevelopment sketch plan in 2013 on this site. At that time their int t was to re del the existing office building into retail space: Continuing, Teague said: at this time Fr a uh is proposing to rezone the site from POD, Planned Office District I, to PCD -2, Planned rciai District and tear down the existing structure and build two new buildings with retail and ice use. Teague asked the Commissi6n for their comments. 49jN�,jr1. ok e c4 Nv � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague February 12, 2014 VI.C. Community Development Director INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Homestead Partners LLC is proposing to subdivide the properties at 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue into three lots. (See property location on pages Al A3.) The existing two homes would be torn down, and three new homes built on the new lots. (See applicant plans on pages A4 —Al2.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. Preliminary & Final Plat. The proposal meets all minimum lot size requirements. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 10,116 square feet, median lot depth is 135 feet, and the median lot width is 75. (See attached median calculations on pages A4 —A5.) Lots 1 & 2 would gain access off of 63rd Street and Lot 3 would gain access off of Warren Avenue. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are single - family homes, zoned and guided low- density residential. Crosstown Highway 62 is located north of the site. (See pages Al -A2.) Existing Site Features The site is 38,907 square feet in size, relatively flat, and contains two single family homes that gain access off of Warren Avenue. The site contains two accessory buildings including a detached garage. All structures would be removed. The site also contains a scattering of mature trees around the perimeter and interior of the site. The applicant proposes to remove 20 interior trees that are primarily Elm and Ash, with one Oak, Maple and Dogwood. The perimeter trees would remain. The applicant is proposing to plant a row of 21 six -foot tall Black Hills Spruce and 32 six -foot tall Techny Arborvitae along the south and west lot lines to provide screening from the two adjacent homes. (See pages A3 and Al2.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Lot Dimensions Single- dwelling residential R -1, Single- dwelling district The proposed subdivision meets all lot dimension requirements. Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable, with a few revisions. First, the sewer line should be extended in the street, not in the front yard of the private property, as proposed. (See page Al 0.) Second, water connections should be made directly from the street, rather than as proposed, which would run new water lines into the site across the front yards of the new lots. (See page Al 0.) These changes would minimize impacts to the front yards of the new lots, and allow future maintenance of the utilities outside of the private property within the right -of- way. Drainage and utility easements should be adjusted accordingly on the Final Plat. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all other lot lines. The detailed grading plans and utility connections would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of building permit application for each lot. PA Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 10,116 s.f. 75 feet 135 feet Lot 1 12,450 s.f. 91 feet 135 feet Lot 2 11,970 s.f. 75 feet 160 feet Lot 3 14,487 s.f. 81 feet 182 feet The proposed subdivision meets all lot dimension requirements. Grading /Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them generally acceptable, with a few revisions. First, the sewer line should be extended in the street, not in the front yard of the private property, as proposed. (See page Al 0.) Second, water connections should be made directly from the street, rather than as proposed, which would run new water lines into the site across the front yards of the new lots. (See page Al 0.) These changes would minimize impacts to the front yards of the new lots, and allow future maintenance of the utilities outside of the private property within the right -of- way. Drainage and utility easements should be adjusted accordingly on the Final Plat. Adequate drainage and utility easements are proposed along all other lot lines. The detailed grading plans and utility connections would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of building permit application for each lot. PA Site Access As shown on page A6 and in the attached 11 x 17 sheets, there is a restricted access to 63d in favor of MnDOT-. This was established as part of the Crosstown Highway .62. Therefore, MnDOT must approve any access driveway to 63rd Street. The. applicant has requested a release of the restriction from MnDOT. MnDOT staff has indicated to Edina staff, that they are agreeable to allowing .. access and releasing the restriction, if Edina is ok with access to 63rd Street. (See pages A18 -A19.) Therefore, as a condition of the Plat approval, a written letter from MnDOT shall be required stating that they are agreeable to the access. As demonstrated on page A2,. there are several homes on 63rd Street that already have direct access to 63rd Park Dedication As with all subdivision proposals, park dedication is required. Edina City Code requires a park dedication fee of $5,000 for each additional lot created. Therefore a park dedication fee of $5,000 would be required. Primary Issue Y Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the proposed subdivision is reasonable for the following reasons 1. The proposed subdivision meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements. As such, the applicant is entitled to subdivide the property. 2. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan to provide year around screening from the most impacted neighbors.to the south and west. A row of 21, six -foot tall Black Hills Spruce and 32, six -foot tall Techny Arborvitae are proposed along the south and west lot lines. (See page Al2.) 3. Building pad locations would meet all minimum setback requirements. The front yard setback requirement for Lot 3 is established by the home to the south, therefore, a 35 -foot setback is required from the Warren Avenue right -of -way. (See page A10.) 3 Staff Recommendation Because the•proposed subdivision meets all of Edina's Zoning Ordinance requirements, recommend that the City Council ;approve the proposed three lot subdivision of 6304 and 6312 Warren Avenue for Homestead Partners. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets all the required standards and ordinances for a subdivision. 2. The applicant is proposing to provide year round screening for the existing homes to the west and south with a row of 21 six -foot tall Black Hills Spruce and 32 'six-foot tall Techny Arborvitae along the south and west lot lines: 3. MnDOT has expressed a willingness to allow access to 63rd Street. Approval is subject,to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Park dedication fee of $5,000 must be paid prior to release of the final plat. 3. Sewer line must be extended in the street, not in the front yard of the private property. Water connections shall be made directly from the street. 4. Drainage and Utility Easements shall be revised on the Final Plat to reflect removing the sewer and water lines from the front yards of the three Lots. The easement along the front lot lines (63rd Street) shall be 10 feet. 5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of a Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. Curb =cut permits must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. C. A grading plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer is required for each building permit. ctJ 1) 1, 6A I? P dC V4 ... .. 1_ � min �L✓ttI ��. � - Jie.... !r./`A -...'� `L�W d.[ - _ d. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. e. Utility hook -ups are subject to review and approval of the city engineer. Deadline for a City Decision: May 6, 2013 I I 1 i RGBERTS PL VA L L -Y V1 E t-V RU 63 RD5IW UA LW i J w w G t. vHlTlydu;a''E on W 4 w z> 64TH ST 1°v 64TH ST , 1 LU j LLJ -.. I.L .. 11 Normandale Park Parcel 04- 116 -21 -22 -0108 A -T -B: Abstract Map Scale: 1" = 400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 2/4/2014 Owner Name: Parcel 6304 Warren Ave Address: Edina, MN 55439 Property Type: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no Home- representation or warranty expressed or stead: implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.59 acres Area: 25,666 sq ft COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Think Green! t 1 r.j7.rtr ,; N C J. `} Ft. •o. -�,c - r.- , t > F� ,r C f C l C ` C• rr � •t� � Parcel 04- 116 -21 -22 -0108 ID: Owner Name: Parcel 6304 Warren Ave Address: Edina, MN 55439 Property Residential Type: Home- stead: Parcel 0.59 acres Area: 25,666 sq ft MA. Q, it Map Scale: V= 200 ft. N Print Date: 2/4/2014 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A Wink Green! AIL Ir At. z w Parcel 04- 116 -21 -22 -0108 Map Scale: 1" = 50 ft. N ID: Print Date: 2/4/2014 Owner Name: Parcel 6304 Warren Ave Address: Edina, MN 55439 Property Type: Home- Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0.59 acres Sale Warranty Deed Area: 25,666 sq ft Code: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A n, link Green! a o m zn u Z F � m o•� � � v ° wre' —iA-- r�_�_� -`_ __B-- MAD ° —` n• as �/� �: ��� i °c m �. , K gt49) ' H 3W1zAA{V'8. 80 ueNVmw a v :t I 1 q i °4 U 2 sa G rgwcre IR B tw @ 3 ° g V l •� ' •. �jP'•�a _o�� g R9) • -� F n p 17U B arm r um 1 1 `�" A r- na .. mu Vim` w N m �c`� g 1 , "a° •,� , W n o eaw000 tre) � aii p a a - -.... — 63RD ST ul a y---- - -- - -'- -aa O W w � . z J i0 ZK. a rr N.- v A �•' o - - - - n w w P 8---- -- ---- Ii9 B , W Z W LL "L a f• uv s u t o B _ .r as B a�pD 01 4- - - =- - -- z 1 a Ln -- B , M1U a reeiso-a w P3) i • w . I.. an .Iva as @ le4 9 I B a l " a 4 s -WWTINf� -- p_— _— AVE_— _ —_ —'1 i R � p� (ul a I°�1 -r_ B (U B .om > rme, .m ymv,a ay mm'e b.,"` n.wwr s. A aM 10 scut rn�r re Pm;rr. a.a w ,PYI ` of 2 PBDFERTYOWNER 'ADDRESS JRXA (Sq. F�):RTMR �'L)'DEPPH d3tyabum0mm I - I419 :II2601amd =J Bk ]m iGmhmndA - ,6,471 .023 _ 4330 FLOheafuAob 'RmdaQ6:be �07Rb6d1mAApm LO9. AL5 4330 E-lI 4017bmmdAt9mm ' 109 _ 61! USO $7eyaltmteml, :d1U1617mdAl- : LOl 623_ 1730. 'Rkhbdabdl&la !OWAmmdAt6W A116 -- DD USO R.bdw.h.. i005M11mdMmm M,Ild 73D MO eepslra/raw j07111hmmdA7mm : n,w WA U10 O.MaJuibloy :d7OhatlmAAmt1 ima IMO ' 1330 I ah -Fenn !dmhmmdAamte 10,116 DD 1330 SRAE171YELWUt. ;6331:MeMmmue.; AjLd tlD _ 1350 ;WgFRv :d112MRm4Aemm -.. -' 0.711 .700 .� ..-W 4330 VegAlOda . . �bILbSRmdA•mm i Auk SOD .175.0 AN®.Del IMb5NgdA'mW 4711 50D. UfA 9ejnh 06 :b7IDbmmd Artmm. + .. 6.74 . 5" .1310 3H d Zmd... V15hQdndAIU. 6.711 . 500 IM limma0aed." lab-aid bT.ia .:MUb6idmdAm91 ;MMM71.4A•.® 170. 510 ;500 010. ' U10_ po6laDmwlm ;000M.AAtmm ' .4743, _ 6717 . 5" 1710 Abml7Ede0Tnu1 ;OMMRI m,qt USU - .. ..90.7. USD 'AbmRtla011m1 r,61MIf&.4Afrnm,! 51.80 DD 010 11731 i6701NmmMeme 70.115. DD ' 1110 lid-lad :M03W -Ateml : Ali$ 73D _4330 030 T-41-U67m7y4 i017NmmAeeme LW1. _ ". U7D.. . I% dhytbm ;dMW -Awem 905 _ an . . Ih6�u107Emb :627W -Av m LM. MD. 1310 RagmlNa9lah6ebe01bE 6nbm �O33W -Atml : 9Ad .'DD USO Soh1m6$Glmd96Aga, ,MpWgMA.- LMI 1L416 1310 b?dcivbm '6141N,1mmAee -m _' .: L®5 ..67D m _ USO md.ft" . _ dww -A, 1101 a" 13 IFdcFtbar 439N9®A \tm7.: .9096 70 1710 . 'Pg4.a7mn ... :045Nemm Atari .' _ 4955. DD , ;hbT.Smdh -- .M!1Nmm,A'emm :d7"W -Al- 401 'RD . . IlOD Jms6ha19Fm 1101. 1100. f335W -A- Am .750_ . 7310 .1140 ',]mir0h6m{ 'MnW -A,tme i _ 13,60 ALO lmcvd&Ded.Cbm . dW-A9 4943 - ®D ..D1D 2136 iP4Dabdmleml6deme0c :d1MW -Annie MW 75D 2761 iaom(W CLbgYllbM4 :01610 -Memo U,US 150 2105 2&bdb U-bp :Al2W -Annie 43.x7 -SOD OIU 21ib]ld OeStr .:O01Nm .t- 7 in 1010 . .700 NOAX LOT M. I 1 LOT - 1 1¢pu1 LOS OEPM L9liO lDT O1Pm 7S0 GL I 781 R 1 ]S0 R 1 ­0 M j-- LOT - 1 12/11 LOT Alm'A 10.116 Emil 1 14709 59FL :ADDRESS ;AREA(SO.FL)!WID38 (FU DEM a'IJ AREA .. �1bb -A-.' IMo, - - I419 :II2601amd 14310 253 4300 Wood swa LSS7_, du 4399 ..099 !13016Lh Smel WOMbitu7 A- _ L9/ 7.93 MD '93 09 :57MNbilbl Atmm i L572 (a MAIL i9WNhitbl A]mm 1,577 MD 4349 :9170'hhbl Atmm (UI 60 - m" :917Nhi1bl ARpm `. LSD MO 430.9 . :9MR'hObl Atmm 22W 7000 _ _ 1010 :570)Nhi5b4AMe µ7M 90D 1500 . :9M17bitb1A -. r 1730 919 L5 0 :dllm 1piedaftk 14M 957 1416 :61comuIrimDAo I 9D 1406, ,..... 0M1t'd{piml)mt .17.16 12769. tlD MA :dill l001nimlbim ' 13M .WD 1710 .. :5701dld Sled 14AI 1010 . .IJu :9M6MGa4- ,. 35,196 _ WS ISU - ;577079hI1blAtmm ILIW lfD 130D `67MBi65etiw7>iYS..; 004RN6ni..DM. . LOM 10.b1S MD WD 1340 1700 ;000Ridiini -Din 14797 _MD 040 ;6779Rmum9md 12106 MO Liu _;6777d¢yIW 12761. A0, 100. 6171[A¢ylme imn MO 190. 'dWD.yL- 14.Ml DD 4300 �917haddm[me lid➢ 103 1110 0 Wj.. #Apnm 11731 171.0. DD :da6Nl. A,- 14471. no 1720 ;15MW) -A`mm lim 7W .InO :017N7mmAmm lb7 MD 1400 :011N7>mm A /m_m: Rla' _DD .. - .1400, :J379hadd.L- - 12541 MID 1000 :915MWdmlme. 17777... ..90. USO :ODhddAwlme 7.097 45D 110 :MMW0m4m 1L416 WA 1715 ;=Ladd.&-. -:d2l2 .9331 1110 .710 mmd A- 17-W 430.0 n00 '2MSSa734vRmd ! 130 AD 110 'S7mMaTQevamd. AIN 1010 V.0 Vl 1 I a / -•• ,rte t WYMAN PLACE o�.4a 16tiv°ara. • "ei r..aW�, IIe -aenr. au . I a1..1 awl®a. , m,x el rw wlt, mw•6 ar _ � .'n n .wan w.a1 r tl..aH .b w.e,„ mw-a G z o, _ _ aw.. ,Y, ue1 _ .'m 41E.a ua w1 .r 41�row e.,a•m a... °pe°m1u.'xu 06-11T I M�'� „ � I°��""":;4°."a”. a. �m °Iln_ e• . a.lma.m m. m ,® a. ae«� '. as Ia^a.v+aw .w•a . a .ba .asawr.W.ae . , l ,w E«me.t w1 `mmw ,.. .1mu.'�a. w w c ma .1 . r:a =" a !L.riI a —W m ,., a .t EDINA, MINNESOTA T I .,m . v I �:,11,1.:�.1.°w'rn 1••aw°q�..' :':�nm °Ia1 `md .W`..."a°.a"°"m ,w' aotla,m�d�,w Is ,e ..� . � °. i � i = �x�' . '\ _ �' Nm mar m • W, a No W , ay MnWn bn4 Ybv°IS e W u � U O O W O O • ItauaalYa n 'tj \ `' I . 'ir Wr` Im ,I a.,"°°° .oue.:"m1.`°"""ue.'"O"'vae wa'°I.a"w.°.I nom.. a'"'.`uA.r... mIx m x W .It ..,... 4 W '�o a�Ea4m �Waan.�HIbWE «,e.m.�Wx�u I.WI ub.1�, °16' 4 ' iW1 I a Lp �i p w IIU1 eia m .w b1 x mlm, ,a bin S°p � T (, 'R� °I e C tb � n° ID' Iml N lal l 'Oxr x •XV�aw Zmtl MdYm:.m,aa b W msai PW Ywa. IWiM OonlntY,nwls `2 O b C E 1P 0 1N 4a.,I, • 1 ?Ne 1 0 9•vWNa u°.Iwaw< r t awH w elvuarxvuM aa.1. .1 svu.: , bn.a. ux 1• n. am b n G.' m s ,61 *r�i'1D °el �5ex u 1 I w I >)W�..w° Ir mtrmn- uw�at,l wmm amw. imaw sWn .. ' F ,R � .' ., ZZ � ,.a�r..r •„ � "t w - - ' I a ;� q -� ... w .u...�uuo,...... b'an .., r b w m�a�e b I...I..a.u.r nw.•.:�° m°a �r \'J - -'1 ,�• °p! n -°�n \' J`��y"\ r" j{ ,'� I�.,. I se LEGEND _ VICINITY MAP - J.� W ... 1 ^ b`!' �� ' \ �' I > s I \ • « w Lia _; 1 .A m / o a x -, -�a� �„ _ -. w-, � t —__ _ - °I—.'�.." � ^ —� 1 � w\ a_rm ! � ' __ _— _ - anmolm F wntl Yawmmt as na1M i°, n ' .{,j a _ ZO E "°1 _- •�.�' = - - - \- '- - ��.t- - - I r - - - ' '1_ - x. ".„ ! r � I- - - C� - _ awmw s.d Yanm. {!' S- z - r �t. // <_.. I I 1��1� ° I O a I I •�1' y ru,,.y) �1 }� I �; - om °les [cwu syol u.wum W I I I <\ 1 I e kil;. IPA I i I - ou:.4. tmlx:e r ft.. � �q I a i`� / �� ,�...1. B i i.,., awt I � I a �^ s5 I«„e 1 a� � � �; I e - a.: °b. ra..�l., •e. 11 }e uxi Y � I __I I ( W I �} - an°lu M HH..,[ I tlV m Eaaa INU1M asnp lel ��I•,, I " «e. .�� -� I I r /%%�%�%..... I ..• - I I I +.na ,' #� &g °,: �� <R = a - De - ww, ea x SPCE DATA • •'.'r �\ aw`L �'4i ...@ $ - av1°lea Oeauk Yela \ •'C31:. •. •, • : ' - - - � -w- - - �o l- - -la - - ` -1 ! - - -. , !� I i- �$- - - a _ It.,aba umur re. � J TOTAL PARCEL AREA ,zu6 sn rx C] I I uo. - - --- tae.9m eq. rc w _ ?1F I, T •t O - owala, uYeauuaa. Yonnav' Lot 1 "' 12,450 sq. Il. ' w r . --� t I ' Lot 2 11,970 eq. ;'L: � R 5 e - ...N. Uud—d Oaalrk or . 1 ,ye,� -�y� -- �L. } .,s. ..n I 4-.�r i. AITyw� + b a d I +1 Tp �, '�fj'rk I , I -1� _ Om6,e Ora w uNllr. L t 3 1 .487 aq. �/� ����� x ai"' f• 'tCp '. wv L.NUMBER OF'LOTS 4 3 ssu'- TOTA W vi Q u tse a 6 ,• , i M °,mow + I I4FFFaaa I - -- `C = I— - De,_ N sim sr. I -. °w,✓ I I.. � -�!'„pDO. �j p6 � .'W�;�� __�___ -om6ln onuar s.m AVFliAGE. LOT. AREA 12,969 sq. lL F � a'Drax.swu I� / .W C] I I L �" I •�p0 w'f I kl I c —� ut I � °a9w„ I I �, ,yy I— � . � u 5° I J�+ I c � - o.,a4. orHlwa uluua Minimum Lot Wldlh at 50 IL tram front lot Q u z �o aQ %a.. I I t 1'° ; I <° _ : s s i 'a r� I a. a,.. :l• 5.... line - 75 R /wn6ilYt1 �� 1- - -- - - =- - - -� I aue tw... , -� N yYf'p•.- d -•— - awata r w' I.I. se n°Itl ui `- _ _ _ pmulu fmo°la 91rtae Minimum Lot Depth al 1 c ? \ I yp i f P midpoint t ar lot tas ra o - h _ Minimum Lot Area - 10,116 sq. ft �L ------ � cyxuew� a"•l?�}1 %a#"J - -o.:me wwnnaa. s,rr w. t-In I �iy. - EMSTING ZONING.`'. R -1 - IA y� °y pr X'f f lltL a.a I i@ /�/ - amatw _g I FL Canlwr PROPOSED ZONING: (t -1 Lu '°"'d� >,w �V,aa . / •,, 241.85 — >v a ta� y'�5�°' "aY lI' �� / / - omal.. t,YUn95R CmWIr UTILITIES Al1AB\ ees o °,xf - _ "TT x - ;+ •- • - �� /--- °_ex"-c " "ox ` s " _ T `° - � I Y t 1t. w �I ifr^E� l (•!,s { t — �I - - - - - urxra wtssss as an n wu nmmg a¢ s .ln o l ou' wAo.rur a Er,sr w ro w rrs tw xr w x[ua Lor la+ `VS0.Hs OV_ ae a• --T M = LOT u a. ww ocuotm an tam Iur. . aim aL m _7=z SHEET INDEX ------------------------- - - - --I ..,,.w.! I I- - - -- tlet—,wa, � 1. o6s77NCCDND177owsar I w I PRELIMINARY PLAT 2 PRELIMINARY T ' ° UTILITY PLAN Nn6n unalsht'IOW. •3 PRELIMINARY GRADING dr CallbNaroyoudlg. EROSION CONTROL PLAN I Lt. MARY LANDSCAPE of P� .3 STE PLAN LEGEND EMONG PROPOSED WIOPOIR I3F SNRMY 41¢a ___ awA6M DECIIM — WITPgE OSCTL'C 903 p lE1DxWE N1% mcnaa mx 8 Porn rvc & D VERIFY) WARNING! BENCHMARKS u. S �Aa m bMP w�i N.T. Nm(tilp i Tq�mA�N M1�dml �tl 331] M1 M al Y. XN mN tl Yn Wla Pq�IY Drams °a A DS9 b) N CNL�CnLEIW W Know. whaye below. Call before you eta. [O ION INPLE FAMILY LOT 75 MINIMUM WIDTH a w3a aa.ol �E Tum �lanm c.n.m xuls: a1D4' IN] mRm6 17 R. Y iXMT 91H�Ot . WATER a/e PER GTY iwYll 9aM® 9441 ap SIIIh 4' PN: TTPC N WARNING! BENCHMARKS u. S �Aa m bMP w�i N.T. Nm(tilp i Tq�mA�N M1�dml �tl 331] M1 M al Y. XN mN tl Yn Wla Pq�IY Drams °a A DS9 b) N CNL�CnLEIW W Know. whaye below. Call before you eta. PLANTING 'NOTES Z 5 ,rtePIN3,Y YIbT E HFKTIL NCgtl6 w1ETDY, TW[L OF Arm DaLSSE Kro 2 TIE mNiRAEfq 9YLL az m9CN9aE tq AIL uIAORS' R0. Eg1NADTq 91WL NO,Ifr ra IANDa:WE AwWrtRE .T aC caxr.Wq gores q eAIEE➢ AR,D wE6APrm A! IrGGIm W ➢¢ I/JmaArF IEmO. z�nuv ,Dui De snwmR TmwlDn Arm EVLL rRmm AxD Au Wmuulrmns �E� ®• ra EAxpa;iPE ATmnEa msmrs ra mart ro seECr Arm mnnma am auWmrss ro cowu c rla WQa SrmW q ME PIArE xLRUV ALL R,ANTT[S e101P! q TIE LIJ65CME TmaID. ar wmeus q suen¢s Dx -are xoi ec lu3nr�m. . - IrssT a wrs PXIq r0 P�wxm W,nrm. mE �mAetw 9w1 ND ➢tt ME tAx05QaPE AxwreR AT IFVSI N XDNW W .ovAx¢ a TIEmT.TlO Parr wsTUUTImI. swma v wwxxQ xmE: mE mmucrmr wr r. T 1 — Esm ,x Ix an- sGSOxs ExnXar Ar ws/I¢n aal. roan m.G AEE omam IWSAwADIgr evOrlE DIWmIQ q AETAI TxmAwnq. l ND 9mmRMRIY A mANT wIAWE SNLLL BE AC®Tm � a acaxm.c,q auu � `� PA PEms,mAxPlAmom AxD -'� ro gSNWL T� TDmWIpIT GWlSmK110N YEW�W� ror wnuas� DRIDNa6 pM In0F99 AlElmxm W WDW,D m M IWmSGVE AXmvIELi. - 6 AIL %ANTND SroG SITYL RSgY ro THE •mR,s' A11 E[WM➢ {xPI ME 9RE WR SIDIX XDl pWlltpl oAT q WLVEAY SNNL S[ I®ID H T]DL WR WRNNTq. PWa9 NDt YAWTMIEp W M6 YAWSA YQL BE xLEE1E0. AM' DWAG ,D WSTNO ArmL 1�N,IE tD�ANG r -NDV. , IL 1 -.AM[ ,:.UG m -DEL 1 CVERDA[fx BA& �EArm Fq NImaA,' STDaE' ANa_O0. IATiT lY,xEL a ASmQAnOrI DF NN➢mm101, xe 4m null "� E.M6S 9MLL DC m➢A4ID AT T8 NIwACIDR•9 E� APmL 1 -wY lk WI6 r -4➢L t! Lv.u[mGx tmnurE uwD➢I auAU,r magolExrs Eon PIAxT wTEwES - n ra wTnucrq auu c mac rq u➢IPEiwc Tx Au Arr,rAm.c ETms mavATOra, Am rgmrs � wn3TExANCE auu � Wu W Tar AErEA EAw raWnw ME noes, s W mA¢ TwAE sxAU � nmT[D� 6 E �n�.9 um 9uYp Tp IDUAe1 SNUL BE PXDIEDrtO ro UIR iSON WL t➢NS,RI,CDW 1w.T10. amxAa m W1DD.N9 EI0. ,n,H f NT. DRAHq rl.ClTD SmmY HMONE ME � mC. Arm Y[mtt ALL UreRRa WaYW10 gDgimx . LWq tYd AWE➢ WRLL ME wST�iYATIW P lNC P4N,5 6 49PI[tE Dlm[CIIW xI5 Bml NADG Ax0 PGN1W6 Am ACtf➢Im FDN,9K W ME WARWIlE YNNreNANQ 91131. � Y AYPq,m R mIS m110E P➢5m W 0.G YAnWY N T¢re01t01 M pROPIDCTUaY YINT6 W!D CWa71 STAT: Qre fJy1 AT AM -DOP! (IR1 CR16 YARD A,6A) q 0. M,WA ➢x0. uYImIWy WELDVK 6 DEAD ARWUI,; n[- SETIWD P{Ax,S 10 RIVRr qA0[ AND If®WD IgGIFm 301w6R � NP➢m �9R wGCO10. CDVIRKIWIgalAtl q W'99l19WE TE RmTS,IW Km TREE REMOVED ]. ALL %ANI NAlO11K WATmmEa SXW6 � Bm! A,m 9,DYI1 AIR APPnmmr.re 6MWACIq 91AI1 E AE9•P19AIE • — — AYY DIIDYLI9 ro IAmuiAre P1AMT RpODADa1L U!E AIIT- OE9LGWT (tlL1PN1! W IPPn01ID CWK) q '�S PWm. AN1' PUM wreAIK MDW DD9. TAm9 � L q DQW4T3 391 I i �Wq ro rorK AECmTAxEC ar ME W TR mower PhD iP03, THE 9re AND SEPU® E EV6 WAxTT; Arm SRE A,A, YRlWO KL WOYJPE ICDTTID SPEOFlGTpIi - W ME M.^ a 0. ALL mKTTmO Am".C4 YYYf BF CPmIF1GY w "^^^A9 T1..r„WD Ym fg1.,WLL4. aDN® Atm GIOWD CPhlq ERTiEI EDUBIE L0.W CWTAWWD . Y®YL ANPWf q mmOY AND CAPAWE O<amTMmiO NDgAR RIXf gtlx'lIL R aWL R. wremxQ uAURAW . WAreA10 50®mE W WN lmt QLLY WAtm ALL'wAM! qDE A ThDE QWrRA- XPL fflO, As �IR[D BT WDIGTPN Di ,�EIIILBk Y,EmI, CRAx A,m EWre ® PnaDU! T®s mmml"an �Prs w,Eau. w Au Y,Ets 1AN,W0 W� Arm Eq nRTS, uTES9 DmaATm .s Woq Dwa�T W,X mEatG,mx a!n T,vE. s.EEDT ,qlm uanDR auuEmL moo xAWOV�Aq� s1mDS I¢�3T�91,RTM59GSYNG,pYUPR ,aTWD Ie.vEl. TEwxe ro oERmWe xEm cmi,anm awA sAYWE ro ,Axosurs AnQ➢,ECr rpq To uumv ax- s�1piE iq Arwovu. ¢vaLW uulml ox omlPV3.k xmsws TIE E aEa,. wvE A m �TM��E ^� T.a Wm�io =to-tD rmmaq AT m wrz Dr a u�E TMe rR¢swr .muxmlgTS Eq wm auu wmu�T wwenrw A rvw AD�rArla DAT.3W DTSrKUnq. usE 3• Eq TRAS' SmDm ams A,m a• amm rATO. m.xmr Ems DmwPgAre Tws annum: Txnaugart ra ENTDC ®3R n➢mm3W3 Wro ra �m�, DoRCtm°pm°°W°1P� EDVq ems uua owue� I I ,L ME P �T ®PrRm S WmS�E L 1A IJl %AN19 9WL BE CYARAIR® iW tlR mDIF1F sEASq UrtR , - xmam, ,A umESS DTmrm. il. 4L 06NImF0 ARFAS 10 mum IAE 10 mW'R 1• rq uuEw. Arm WATm m+Ta . rRKnrt sArm DE q.a s NW TIE PIAxDND NOTC .�,; DIE$ TPE1a®. ra DTARWam 9WL CDaW ME E,AL COST 1®GCdATr WRLDwO IADan Arm mANiS • ujZ yw LU i I GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE O ' PATS[ON!' N aal�em. _ ua raa uie Of Qa�wN�w 9D.D..x,m r �M a Wr¢A1 Ll I �0f 1 I I I %� I I e � I � / a96 �• 1 0000�49+0�0 00000000 O O iaa PLANTING 'NOTES Z 5 ,rtePIN3,Y YIbT E HFKTIL NCgtl6 w1ETDY, TW[L OF Arm DaLSSE Kro 2 TIE mNiRAEfq 9YLL az m9CN9aE tq AIL uIAORS' R0. Eg1NADTq 91WL NO,Ifr ra IANDa:WE AwWrtRE .T aC caxr.Wq gores q eAIEE➢ AR,D wE6APrm A! IrGGIm W ➢¢ I/JmaArF IEmO. z�nuv ,Dui De snwmR TmwlDn Arm EVLL rRmm AxD Au Wmuulrmns �E� ®• ra EAxpa;iPE ATmnEa msmrs ra mart ro seECr Arm mnnma am auWmrss ro cowu c rla WQa SrmW q ME PIArE xLRUV ALL R,ANTT[S e101P! q TIE LIJ65CME TmaID. ar wmeus q suen¢s Dx -are xoi ec lu3nr�m. . - IrssT a wrs PXIq r0 P�wxm W,nrm. mE �mAetw 9w1 ND ➢tt ME tAx05QaPE AxwreR AT IFVSI N XDNW W .ovAx¢ a TIEmT.TlO Parr wsTUUTImI. swma v wwxxQ xmE: mE mmucrmr wr r. T 1 — Esm ,x Ix an- sGSOxs ExnXar Ar ws/I¢n aal. roan m.G AEE omam IWSAwADIgr evOrlE DIWmIQ q AETAI TxmAwnq. l ND 9mmRMRIY A mANT wIAWE SNLLL BE AC®Tm � a acaxm.c,q auu � `� PA PEms,mAxPlAmom AxD -'� ro gSNWL T� TDmWIpIT GWlSmK110N YEW�W� ror wnuas� DRIDNa6 pM In0F99 AlElmxm W WDW,D m M IWmSGVE AXmvIELi. - 6 AIL %ANTND SroG SITYL RSgY ro THE •mR,s' A11 E[WM➢ {xPI ME 9RE WR SIDIX XDl pWlltpl oAT q WLVEAY SNNL S[ I®ID H T]DL WR WRNNTq. PWa9 NDt YAWTMIEp W M6 YAWSA YQL BE xLEE1E0. AM' DWAG ,D WSTNO ArmL 1�N,IE tD�ANG r -NDV. , IL 1 -.AM[ ,:.UG m -DEL 1 CVERDA[fx BA& �EArm Fq NImaA,' STDaE' ANa_O0. IATiT lY,xEL a ASmQAnOrI DF NN➢mm101, xe 4m null "� E.M6S 9MLL DC m➢A4ID AT T8 NIwACIDR•9 E� APmL 1 -wY lk WI6 r -4➢L t! Lv.u[mGx tmnurE uwD➢I auAU,r magolExrs Eon PIAxT wTEwES - n ra wTnucrq auu c mac rq u➢IPEiwc Tx Au Arr,rAm.c ETms mavATOra, Am rgmrs � wn3TExANCE auu � Wu W Tar AErEA EAw raWnw ME noes, s W mA¢ TwAE sxAU � nmT[D� 6 E �n�.9 um 9uYp Tp IDUAe1 SNUL BE PXDIEDrtO ro UIR iSON WL t➢NS,RI,CDW 1w.T10. amxAa m W1DD.N9 EI0. ,n,H f NT. DRAHq rl.ClTD SmmY HMONE ME � mC. Arm Y[mtt ALL UreRRa WaYW10 gDgimx . LWq tYd AWE➢ WRLL ME wST�iYATIW P lNC P4N,5 6 49PI[tE Dlm[CIIW xI5 Bml NADG Ax0 PGN1W6 Am ACtf➢Im FDN,9K W ME WARWIlE YNNreNANQ 91131. � Y AYPq,m R mIS m110E P➢5m W 0.G YAnWY N T¢re01t01 M pROPIDCTUaY YINT6 W!D CWa71 STAT: Qre fJy1 AT AM -DOP! (IR1 CR16 YARD A,6A) q 0. M,WA ➢x0. uYImIWy WELDVK 6 DEAD ARWUI,; n[- SETIWD P{Ax,S 10 RIVRr qA0[ AND If®WD IgGIFm 301w6R � NP➢m �9R wGCO10. CDVIRKIWIgalAtl q W'99l19WE TE RmTS,IW Km rUJIR N . W ➢VB r09n0N TANCE ra PWm 9ULL ASnYE YMIIMANCF AE��p19mA�116 Da¢Ml TE ]. ALL %ANI NAlO11K WATmmEa SXW6 � Bm! A,m 9,DYI1 AIR APPnmmr.re 6MWACIq 91AI1 E AE9•P19AIE mPAW DP ANT DAYAlO ro EAYL ra I..NpSDAPF AnmORtr DE CIW,ruf ro m: WE9R3aa1L fWl I�WO ME MWPIgR TIE WARmRt£ iq CDIgflE MRMR V NL mAYTXO DF➢! AT 910,W AIm AD.➢!Tm ro cmDTwr ro ME dACf - mm�1°ilora a ME are LvmscArE AYY DIIDYLI9 ro IAmuiAre P1AMT RpODADa1L U!E AIIT- OE9LGWT (tlL1PN1! W IPPn01ID CWK) q '�S PWm. AN1' PUM wreAIK MDW DD9. TAm9 � L q DQW4T3 AmTSnEq a,AU . APPHOK ra STAIPm IDGTM V ALL PIAXi wremNa PmW ro 0.�� 1AEEY YDlT BE AWmTL uu,aEa ATm ST.V® A9 P,Axls WwIDW Ir.E AxD Rn EwmnEExs umn AI,YISre APVLY A9 EEx uANDACOKFRY ESmY<Dm3' Kl C.910DFDL9 null E SR4Ym W ME Gre ENL iq WNTR - m0Im1mM DNWXD tlNW W,Y PADDD. �Wq ro rorK AECmTAxEC ar ME W TR mower PhD iP03, THE 9re AND SEPU® E EV6 WAxTT; Arm SRE A,A, YRlWO KL WOYJPE ICDTTID SPEOFlGTpIi - W ME M.^ a 0. ALL mKTTmO Am".C4 YYYf BF CPmIF1GY w "^^^A9 T1..r„WD Ym fg1.,WLL4. aDN® Atm GIOWD CPhlq ERTiEI EDUBIE L0.W CWTAWWD . Y®YL ANPWf q mmOY AND CAPAWE O<amTMmiO NDgAR RIXf gtlx'lIL R aWL R. wremxQ uAURAW . WAreA10 50®mE W WN lmt QLLY WAtm ALL'wAM! qDE A ThDE QWrRA- XPL fflO, As �IR[D BT WDIGTPN Di ,�EIIILBk Y,EmI, CRAx A,m EWre ® PnaDU! T®s mmml"an �Prs w,Eau. w Au Y,Ets 1AN,W0 W� Arm Eq nRTS, uTES9 DmaATm .s Woq Dwa�T W,X mEatG,mx a!n T,vE. s.EEDT ,qlm uanDR auuEmL moo xAWOV�Aq� s1mDS I¢�3T�91,RTM59GSYNG,pYUPR ,aTWD Ie.vEl. TEwxe ro oERmWe xEm cmi,anm awA sAYWE ro ,Axosurs AnQ➢,ECr rpq To uumv ax- s�1piE iq Arwovu. ¢vaLW uulml ox omlPV3.k xmsws TIE E aEa,. wvE A m �TM��E ^� T.a Wm�io =to-tD rmmaq AT m wrz Dr a u�E TMe rR¢swr .muxmlgTS Eq wm auu wmu�T wwenrw A rvw AD�rArla DAT.3W DTSrKUnq. usE 3• Eq TRAS' SmDm ams A,m a• amm rATO. m.xmr Ems DmwPgAre Tws annum: Txnaugart ra ENTDC ®3R n➢mm3W3 Wro ra �m�, DoRCtm°pm°°W°1P� EDVq ems uua owue� .lW ,Y W SW. 30. SEE S1WF! 201 iq PWDmSm .Dtlw1mN STSnY ,L ME P �T ®PrRm S WmS�E L 1A IJl %AN19 9WL BE CYARAIR® iW tlR mDIF1F sEASq UrtR , - xmam, ,A umESS DTmrm. il. 4L 06NImF0 ARFAS 10 mum IAE 10 mW'R 1• rq uuEw. Arm WATm m+Ta . rRKnrt sArm DE q.a s NW TIE PIAxDND NOTC .�,; DIE$ TPE1a®. ra DTARWam 9WL CDaW ME E,AL COST 1®GCdATr WRLDwO IADan Arm mANiS o�� ®mom LANDMA=Rs u.c Lml@mySANJlxfuv a><,mAapm . 612.598.5706 A5 N �I s lam CONIFER WS TREE PLANTING DETAIL f r'� T� m ;< E O n Na Z 5 � W �.+ W H z a� z a f c 3w H w c 6 J J w W u n m ark ujZ yw LU O ' PATS[ON!' N aal�em. _ ua raa uie Qa�wN�w 9D.D..x,m r �M a Wr¢A1 Ll �0f 1 I ( GRADING PLAN LOT KEY�m SUBGRADE CORRECTION INFILTRATION BASIN auWa . roam I— nm1 wmG m,m'i+mipFO `•TT° m �. om 5 o mamn saPn¢ a"w.a I � m ,.r I i —nwmrn a —T —1 _ f mm Wm nEr "ucx eeuo •p `smWn a Soli ` . ' ' 3••r ,ti mWmm I sEO —sec fUNi G"ss wa- TZGm,T saw ��� ' • �•'[ *�,'.J••i_ cawr.a I 1 .I no —x.1am Wucrm ?�srL, '+'•�:.%,t�' I zm> —smE z.mrn puxmrt � � - �� "na sP,mmPmsull,an m � lur csucozr alssozs ro eE Suzan ooml ro 0vsmm Ezwuul _ — iHI N'o"o°val Ws"O°�meN° vs`s'ivl�imi a E�v"nEw� 4 - - - - -" " - - - -- MODIFIED LOOKOUT e NO SCN[ t W^ e PPM1 j�"°^,P I I WmKFP 61O6LL TURF ESTABLISHMENT ' .R i rnmmsmrt s,uu "..EY ro "u maw® "ais am a1u1 K iwN Enrr�r ro umm summm vcavw,ala ,a zasTnurna (xon7 � I Y0p°® X06 mmurtP M"onu u� s� sam+r sxru m:cm n smm .s vuamc mrt w xo uu � n fwwm auOE � � d ,P a"O:xO aNOE I SEaL W W, Y6„� m •T m IW6 Ppi .p2 OamMR 5[Em 9W1 m: n•gE0 •T 1m2 9Z uamK MI[ "ElG �— --- -- -- - - -- - --- - xamwEnn m. , _ rn�s' MWM ,rPF 2 -].., zw acmes IG .O2 ZP W'TWSOE aumE (- -" ,anxX° -2 - Hess: ,• .' S- `��•'y , " sxs• Tana wmm m mTaom mr �jf' , ./ Sa< ONOEIO OYOE 2 aIx wl ugg0 wm,S wro ,xE 6 ..I�IE 0011mm1 SmE a M(.,n¢!a/ /JOLS 1 w6,s SWLL eE v/�D " u.nmel OE . IFFY "vu,T. / ,ay WIfP® IEiSWD aWE A GY mR 66T iinQ NWIO 1HE WW1 90f Of NICXOR - 0anvm auM a sam[EY •TUO1 su rma' ro xw,a waa of 1poyw'� ve¢�i "TrnomwTS xn m / u��soou�EGY" BENCHMARKS Pl- al—(' - XQFSIFLT zraPEl W,aaN i•,wf°O�� °` Mo M PwKI+ a� OPrtau aP- ma,/aF u "aNU. G41Br'SGIEYW p0 W�A•RNING! % �f Know wears below. Call before you dlg Pmxmn u¢ �0=� mruuwum C ----� C Mai tiff 7 GlaT6Tl� SL1NT — r.•_.•T' STmu�iG Y9� - -- TREE REMOVED (TYP.) 63RD uNT+amE O ge YNx w mow@ — r carom ---- sEU..� rua uW Fany SPoT FIF/ "LION OPmm"sP oa 12. Tzmwe 1- Y -1rY'1 °-- ...... EuEmxncr axnrtPP EOf. ♦���� GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ,zEE P ENTRANCE BOCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I I I • 0 9920 I I R J 1. Ono R /�.•i ;. �� "'/j •` "•/ 1 E I I IW I v (roNOOw exio I 11n : I < __y d R NPISE / '• m/ (MONO weTra ec^n I,/ :I 1 7 D! I.�ypyl I I I i 1 — \ � �i' � r• ; I pO 0O 0;0 O 1. o p0O o0 I — � -- / — �OE�0 000 ' I ,tp F � GRADING PLAN LOT KEY�m SUBGRADE CORRECTION INFILTRATION BASIN auWa . roam I— nm1 wmG m,m'i+mipFO `•TT° m �. om 5 o mamn saPn¢ a"w.a I � m ,.r I i —nwmrn a —T —1 _ f mm Wm nEr "ucx eeuo •p `smWn a Soli ` . ' ' 3••r ,ti mWmm I sEO —sec fUNi G"ss wa- TZGm,T saw ��� ' • �•'[ *�,'.J••i_ cawr.a I 1 .I no —x.1am Wucrm ?�srL, '+'•�:.%,t�' I zm> —smE z.mrn puxmrt � � - �� "na sP,mmPmsull,an m � lur csucozr alssozs ro eE Suzan ooml ro 0vsmm Ezwuul _ — iHI N'o"o°val Ws"O°�meN° vs`s'ivl�imi a E�v"nEw� 4 - - - - -" " - - - -- MODIFIED LOOKOUT e NO SCN[ t W^ e PPM1 j�"°^,P I I WmKFP 61O6LL TURF ESTABLISHMENT ' .R i rnmmsmrt s,uu "..EY ro "u maw® "ais am a1u1 K iwN Enrr�r ro umm summm vcavw,ala ,a zasTnurna (xon7 � I Y0p°® X06 mmurtP M"onu u� s� sam+r sxru m:cm n smm .s vuamc mrt w xo uu � n fwwm auOE � � d ,P a"O:xO aNOE I SEaL W W, Y6„� m •T m IW6 Ppi .p2 OamMR 5[Em 9W1 m: n•gE0 •T 1m2 9Z uamK MI[ "ElG �— --- -- -- - - -- - --- - xamwEnn m. , _ rn�s' MWM ,rPF 2 -].., zw acmes IG .O2 ZP W'TWSOE aumE (- -" ,anxX° -2 - Hess: ,• .' S- `��•'y , " sxs• Tana wmm m mTaom mr �jf' , ./ Sa< ONOEIO OYOE 2 aIx wl ugg0 wm,S wro ,xE 6 ..I�IE 0011mm1 SmE a M(.,n¢!a/ /JOLS 1 w6,s SWLL eE v/�D " u.nmel OE . IFFY "vu,T. / ,ay WIfP® IEiSWD aWE A GY mR 66T iinQ NWIO 1HE WW1 90f Of NICXOR - 0anvm auM a sam[EY •TUO1 su rma' ro xw,a waa of 1poyw'� ve¢�i "TrnomwTS xn m / u��soou�EGY" BENCHMARKS Pl- al—(' - XQFSIFLT zraPEl W,aaN i•,wf°O�� °` Mo M PwKI+ a� OPrtau aP- ma,/aF u "aNU. G41Br'SGIEYW p0 W�A•RNING! % �f Know wears below. Call before you dlg Pmxmn u¢ �0=� mruuwum C ----� C Mai tiff 7 GlaT6Tl� SL1NT — r.•_.•T' STmu�iG Y9� - -- TREE REMOVED (TYP.) area uNT+amE O ge YNx w mow@ — r carom ---- sEU..� rua uW Fany SPoT FIF/ "LION OPmm"sP oa 12. Tzmwe 1- Y -1rY'1 °-- ...... EuEmxncr axnrtPP EOf. ♦���� GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ,zEE P ENTRANCE BOCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE GRADING PLAN LOT KEY�m SUBGRADE CORRECTION INFILTRATION BASIN auWa . roam I— nm1 wmG m,m'i+mipFO `•TT° m �. om 5 o mamn saPn¢ a"w.a I � m ,.r I i —nwmrn a —T —1 _ f mm Wm nEr "ucx eeuo •p `smWn a Soli ` . ' ' 3••r ,ti mWmm I sEO —sec fUNi G"ss wa- TZGm,T saw ��� ' • �•'[ *�,'.J••i_ cawr.a I 1 .I no —x.1am Wucrm ?�srL, '+'•�:.%,t�' I zm> —smE z.mrn puxmrt � � - �� "na sP,mmPmsull,an m � lur csucozr alssozs ro eE Suzan ooml ro 0vsmm Ezwuul _ — iHI N'o"o°val Ws"O°�meN° vs`s'ivl�imi a E�v"nEw� 4 - - - - -" " - - - -- MODIFIED LOOKOUT e NO SCN[ t W^ e PPM1 j�"°^,P I I WmKFP 61O6LL TURF ESTABLISHMENT ' .R i rnmmsmrt s,uu "..EY ro "u maw® "ais am a1u1 K iwN Enrr�r ro umm summm vcavw,ala ,a zasTnurna (xon7 � I Y0p°® X06 mmurtP M"onu u� s� sam+r sxru m:cm n smm .s vuamc mrt w xo uu � n fwwm auOE � � d ,P a"O:xO aNOE I SEaL W W, Y6„� m •T m IW6 Ppi .p2 OamMR 5[Em 9W1 m: n•gE0 •T 1m2 9Z uamK MI[ "ElG �— --- -- -- - - -- - --- - xamwEnn m. , _ rn�s' MWM ,rPF 2 -].., zw acmes IG .O2 ZP W'TWSOE aumE (- -" ,anxX° -2 - Hess: ,• .' S- `��•'y , " sxs• Tana wmm m mTaom mr �jf' , ./ Sa< ONOEIO OYOE 2 aIx wl ugg0 wm,S wro ,xE 6 ..I�IE 0011mm1 SmE a M(.,n¢!a/ /JOLS 1 w6,s SWLL eE v/�D " u.nmel OE . IFFY "vu,T. / ,ay WIfP® IEiSWD aWE A GY mR 66T iinQ NWIO 1HE WW1 90f Of NICXOR - 0anvm auM a sam[EY •TUO1 su rma' ro xw,a waa of 1poyw'� ve¢�i "TrnomwTS xn m / u��soou�EGY" BENCHMARKS Pl- al—(' - XQFSIFLT zraPEl W,aaN i•,wf°O�� °` Mo M PwKI+ a� OPrtau aP- ma,/aF u "aNU. G41Br'SGIEYW p0 W�A•RNING! % �f Know wears below. Call before you dlg _.r �I .I i °' Iii----- I - - - -1 i I i � L-I lid Ill 'ALL :LD VERIFY) ACE MON Bc WATER 4 PER CITY GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 60.5 59.4-- - - - - -- 8 & Una 2 I BLOCK NUMBER NT I 5 LOT NUMBER E DRAINAGE I I I HOUSE TYPES _ I R RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY nr ELEVAMON 967.0 = LO— RRAAMMBLLERR LOOKOUT OR SPLIT H NG I SLO —SIDE LOOKOUT GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP I O WO— RAMBLER WALKOUT [ENDED I SWD—SIDE RAMBLER WALKOUT SIDE G 68.0 I � ELEVanoN 1 INFILTRATION BASIN �T,_7 D WITH MIX TOLERANT OF DATION AND DROUGHT. __ - -___ - -_ :ORNER - - - - -J DENOTES STEP CONDITION (IN FEE I) PLANTING MEDIUM - 64.4 70% HOMOGENEOUS SAND _ 30% ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST I SUBSOILS TO BE SUBCUT DOWN TO FJ(ISTING GRANULAR _ -____ STREET TURF ESTABLISHMENT f SOILS AND BACKFILLED WITH ONSITE GRANULAR MATERIALS THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. MODIFIED LOOKOUT it NO SCALE SELECT BACKFILL I MATERIAL F—VARIES VARIES ;(FRONT SETBACK) q `� I COMPACTED BACKFlLL I I EE REMOVED YP.) ZAVEL CONSTRUCTION ITRANCE SUBGRADE CORRECTION ON TOPSOIL SELECT aAC KFILL MATERIAL p 1 v GRADE POSED FWSNED GRADE r E70STTNG GRADE LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 4a ,e � 111TH' ..: ?O O �_O�OO O O O"O �J 48�'�� /y I u,� ,�I'•we OOOIOO�O0�00�0 / r L- - TING _ — \ \ -�/�- m Eul to / / V/ CA RAGE PA J 1TING NOTES / \ i TREE REMOVED • 7 (TYP.) • 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. — m °axom x\ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN I I I LLD' ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. TENTS SPECIFIED. II I Tluj° occidwtalis 'Tmhny' ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 27. SEASONS/TME OF PLANTING NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, INSTALLATION. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS. PLANTERS AND PLANT TO PLT IN OFF - SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PL �IHER NT$: I BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE i) is I DECIDUOUS B&B; y( ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANY � �il 1 a i 3 � • M \O 1 � 'SERY STOCK' ANSI -Z60. LATEST EDITION, OF • iM i t EVERGREEN Bdt8: I I — �' —s 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION •: ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS z LdQ ND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED GOVERNING THE WORK. •� ROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFlC. STORAGE OF H 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING 16. LOCATE N F RIFT ALL ETI RY U INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES. WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE MAINTENANCE SHALL RTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM •'4 INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE- SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING m kill ,e BOD -252 -1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 45 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING I RIAL QUANTITIES. SHAPES OF BEDS AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND II HI - -- - ti I CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE ;OMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. TREES PLUMB THOUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. D ADJUSTED A CONFORM C THE EXACT SITE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT a+ALL ��W r 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES T DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF - `RK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY II I I I REMOVED FROM THE STE AND RE, RH MATERIAL OF THE SAME / EVERGREENS PROTECTION RING WNR NTY PFRIODE LATE FALL FOR WINTER SPECIFICATIQUANTITY. NS. AND SIZE N ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND I �1 Wei % t'! w .� e u I I I I I I a I I I 1 �` 1• � I I I I I I i I A. i I 2 — LI I .. 4a ,e � 111TH' ..: ?O O �_O�OO O O O"O �J 48�'�� /y I u,� ,�I'•we OOOIOO�O0�00�0 / r L- - TING _ — \ \ -�/�- m Eul to / / V/ CA RAGE PA J 1TING NOTES / \ i TREE REMOVED • 7 (TYP.) • 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. — m °axom x\ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN I I I LLD' ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. TENTS SPECIFIED. II I Tluj° occidwtalis 'Tmhny' ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 27. SEASONS/TME OF PLANTING NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, INSTALLATION. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS. PLANTERS AND PLANT TO PLT IN OFF - SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PL �IHER NT$: I BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE i) is I DECIDUOUS B&B; y( ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANY II II II i PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED 1 a i 3 � fOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN I I I - 'SERY STOCK' ANSI -Z60. LATEST EDITION, OF THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING EVERGREEN Bdt8: )CIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL y APRIL 1 -MAY 15; AUG. 21 -SEPT. 15 TI 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS z LdQ ND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED GOVERNING THE WORK. AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS ROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFlC. STORAGE OF H 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING 16. LOCATE N F RIFT ALL ETI RY U INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES. WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE MAINTENANCE SHALL RTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM ONE CALL AT 4S4 -0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE- SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING BOD -252 -1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 45 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER RIAL QUANTITIES. SHAPES OF BEDS AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND II HI - -- - REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE ;OMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. TREES PLUMB THOUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. D ADJUSTED A CONFORM C THE EXACT SITE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT a+ALL ��W r 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES T DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF - `RK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY II I I I REMOVED FROM THE STE AND RE, RH MATERIAL OF THE SAME / EVERGREENS PROTECTION RING WNR NTY PFRIODE LATE FALL FOR WINTER SPECIFICATIQUANTITY. NS. AND SIZE N ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND I I J Ef ® I I I I I T BE HEALTHY, VIGOROUS MATERIAL. FREE OF AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. CATELANDSCAPE R IN THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. THE PLAN . VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LNDSCAPE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN BE STRAIGHT TRUNKEO AND FULL HEADED AND LLD' ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. TENTS SPECIFIED. 13. LONG -TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE Tluj° occidwtalis 'Tmhny' ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 27. SEASONS/TME OF PLANTING NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, INSTALLATION. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS. PLANTERS AND PLANT TO PLT IN OFF - SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PL �IHER NT$: BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED. ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21 -NOV. i 15 OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED ACCESS TO BE MAINTANED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. DECIDUOUS B&B; IN 'WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANY APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21 -NOV. 1 PLANT STOCK NOT PLANTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS; - fOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN IN AND WATERED UNTIL INSTALLATION. PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN APRIL 1 -JUNE 1; AUG. 21 -OCT. 1 'SERY STOCK' ANSI -Z60. LATEST EDITION, OF THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING EVERGREEN Bdt8: )CIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. APRIL 1 -MAY 15; AUG. 21 -SEPT. 15 PLANT J DUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS PLANT OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED ND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED GOVERNING THE WORK. AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS ROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFlC. STORAGE OF H 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING 16. LOCATE N F RIFT ALL ETI RY U INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES. WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE MAINTENANCE SHALL RTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM ONE CALL AT 4S4 -0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE- SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING BOD -252 -1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 45 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER RIAL QUANTITIES. SHAPES OF BEDS AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES HOWEVER, THE ARE APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE ;OMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. TREES PLUMB THOUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. D ADJUSTED A CONFORM C THE EXACT SITE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT a+ALL 17. USE ANTI- DESICCANT WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL ON ( ) 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES INC LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MA- °RIOR DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF - `RK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY ANYTIME APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL REMOVED FROM THE STE AND RE, RH MATERIAL OF THE SAME BE PLANTED, MULCHED, AND S EVERGREENS PROTECTION RING WNR NTY PFRIODE LATE FALL FOR WINTER SPECIFICATIQUANTITY. NS. AND SIZE N ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ` lJ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILANDSCAPE LEGEND KEY I BOTMUCAL Nllg 10OMMON NUHE SIZE I ROOT Ott. I�At.RKS COXIFEMM TREES P¢e° gloat° dens°t° BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' HT. Y1 Tluj° occidwtalis 'Tmhny' TECHNY ARBORVITAE 6' HT. 32 PEI ggg-mmifi-71 f, Am .1k MM - ww4"I'll! SAM., IF ve rra ` j`'f i � � �` � �w ''i�A\. "�{ '`ZC _"ir �."" 1, v, .. - v �l� s.,. rr,�n••••':.�. -.,, .. �� �t� \. ► ! ��\ �ow�•��� !/{ oti�'� !j' !+ ;'` i '�,iP ► '+ r�(4���,��.s'.1 ��r .�. ^� �j .;!)a'P�:.�a••.'r'$.v.^ F l�,r� - "�y� � `` . '��ar, A�, �ij.r �'� 1 I, ��Y „� � >4i���.�``i1 �'��'� ��\��7 "' ,."tr.� �; p prh�1w -.s ,•u�.a�9a >:a'(A'Yr '� `'!o�, •_"�"�s�'. �+; '�� � � � It4x9.� �- a��� .�'e`'-.. A ��lf ['�M,�di1Pi' Ji ♦� �N�� (�,,aC\i `�p�� j��w�1 t P' L "� ` s�+' �i'b - �� +l!;ts' �"'�..tr C�M1 =�tR4 4 � N' s S . r'w CSa. •XJ�P�' A �-�a5. rgYj N`ygF. ►�'ef i�j�[°e;�i /ri J��r ���j i��'/ °�q ��I b �� ,� i / �r� ^ •Ptr� �a i`•!� r �L f� ��,my,�.'V.,•:.'s'-w p� , lJ , ��•i (����, i �EY�.% , .� �� \' VIA PrAvTv 1� \pry a � C, W. • Il�' ' "� ` �i •'6+ �j r' t i •?ia{ :Y ..y ,r 61 'I '�+ F n�' y A i.w • i �'�- G p Y �.� �`f •y '� /:�. a �� r �� N 11�1�, >° iy, Y' �� �! }j �"�/j ,; j�+i�y"''la� '� 'w r�• ..�- 1 Y -� ' V on aV' •c �.•,u�?,� �,.�i, IVA • �, \ ►R'' v t%i1 71 i' �► \ i •, �� 1N,�C.,,' d9:.Y /,t• � r' t i arJ '�,� { 9 IJ�„'. 1 ��g` tal Gee- .,w a 6 r,;, f 1 p, ,r.4�'• p ' $ p ; o �� •. �' . s' �'r 6e F'P 'rl,' • %-l' 1't - ••�.t,� . .{ly. A. m m a 7r `� � r d.!21' ? 1 p� �',grs"r�'•'iy s °.' -Sam i '�}A.�?, d ' �� I4�► � r �' �� �. �� b,I�� �•�. /r / g yt7w+A, Pks 7;,'� dal !Y! `�. I n� ✓.,,((,,; ��` .. s� 's{ I�7",G f�• .0 �'Y T JM/�'y1'+'hj� /t� / .�i�" ''( J //9 -� �f tai �jt• ! � • ='' K . 'r, A p, ti � �.CSl+A�i?I ��I�” wRLTI� \,Yfl S 4 / � •1 - ,L1Y '' ORN �� ,i : 4 � � �. r > ,• X r. � P ``L 'd �' �I f dd�.��!" r r�, �{+� 5 r�fAi /, •2]m � �r 1.. . �� � �� Z §f '!. `` 'yy\ c v C 7lj�l �}� tiiy"`.T�I e i '+',ins „e 1� .�•q '��t+y is �� 1�En6 � ` f i WOM Z° +we 77?1 ' 'I' , r �� r i ' �. 9m Vii• wu -- r k, _ t''wSar'•i),,.�}�,4� Y•y � ,... , �� � �3�; _ �`+G!��j �� o- rt���0. :�• ���`•�Fi}4�►� �1� tip ,`t ,, ry poor <_r s :° tl 't, _1 7 'wo QN, .7710R, f y, Ff '1777 )OP _MV 'g.(! 'lq NR R, ON. gt' Ri.l INA N I v 'D , 0917 -"k*4- A442h ,gap M- ZR A7 Ail ' WAN. RA C ON A PW 70 4 olyrAlp; a X\ j ib; at yy mv OWA; N wm 'w Oro, fo, 11:7 , 20 Mal iii 441rarl�A` 4 A. .90 1 i a3 ! I?. 3r, Im, tl MEN ��j 17, MR 'A -aim, At aiV V (fl % W"Ri ON. 'AIA Cis 3 T 5C i�flxow wl jvP fro All 4;P, V�o Mok 6a' WO Ig , WIR ;ML-1 I I -I I I I I I , I I I W 1.;�7 IN ox M IM11141 pm Go d� 7 �:jjp ? A N, 4 FI A t11 0'.N. 'RIP _ ZIP, iS All 7Q; 55 WO f, 0, AM i ;AV, Ot -1.%4 il (f A R M N JP R T V -ST 25w - W-1 Jr, NIKI If PC' w5 A ilk WAN ?A. S, ! 44 ■ R q w5 A ilk WAN ?A. S, ! 44 ■ Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sherman, Tod (DOT) <Tod.Sherman @state.mn.us> Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 4:59 PM To: Stephen Bona Cc: Chad Millner; Kautz, Tiffany (DOT); Craig, E.Buck (DOT); Jackie. Hoogenakker Subject: RE: Turnback request on 63rd St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave Stephen: �. I'm just saying that since we're well into the process of turning back the right -of -way to the City, that it would be the City's call whether you're allowed access onto the road or not. You will not need a MnDOT access permit. Thanks, Tod Tod ShermarrpPlanning Supervisor Mn /DOT Metro District 1500 W. County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234 -7794 tod.sherman @state.mn.us From:. Stephen Bona [ mailto :stephen.bona(&gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:47 PM To: Sherman, Tod (DOT) Cc: cmillner @EdinaMN.gov; Kautz, Tiffany (DOT) Subject: RE: Turnback request on 63rd St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave Todd, Thanks for the clarification. I'm just trying to get a better understanding.of when I can build driveways onto 63`d street. Tiffany's letter states that since the turnback process has been initiated, MNDOT is potentially willing to allow access to 63`d street at this location.. Does this mean that following:your review of the plans_, we will be able to access the road? Any further explanation would be appreciated. Thanks, Steve Stephen A. Bona Homestead Partners 651 -271 -4951 From: Sherman, Tod (DOT) [ mailto :Tod.Sherman(alstate.mn.us] Sent, Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:50 PM To: Stephen Bona Cc: Craig, E.Buck (DOT); Kautz, Tiffany (DOT) Subject: RE: Turnback request on 63rd St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave Stephen: I was talking with our permits people and you will not be going through MnDOT for the access permit. We are in the process of transferring the right -of -way to the City, so the permit will come from the City. Sorry for the confusion. Tod Tod Sherman, Planning Supervisor Mn /DOT Metro District 1500 W. County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 234 -7794 tod.sherman @state.mn.us From: Stephen Bona [ mailto:stephen.bona(&gmail.com] Sent, Wednesday, January 29, 2014 8:30 AM: To.. Sherman, Tod (DOT) Subject: RE: Turnback request on 63rd St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave Todd — I'll watch for your letter on 2/12 and plan to apply for an access permit shortly thereafter. As I mentioned, our current platting schedule with the city of Edina allows for home construction to begin in March /April. I would like to complete the MNDOT process, so I can stay on this schedule. Per our conversation, you mentioned that this was reasonable. Please let me know if you need any further information from me. Thank you, Steve Stephen A. Bona Homestead Partners 651- 271 -4951 From: Kautz, Tiffany (DOT) [ mailto :tiffany.kautz(abstate.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 4:59 PM To: cmillner(abEdinaMN.gov Cc: Anderson, Debra (DOT); Crocker, Keith (DOT); Sherman, Tod (DOT); Stephen Bona (stephen. bona (abgmail.com) Subject: Turnback request on 63rd St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave Hi Chad. Attached is an electronic copy of the letter regarding the City of Edina's turnback request on 63`d St at TH 62 and Wyman Ave. The hard copy is being sent via US mail. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Tiffany Tiffany Kautz, PE Metro District Right -of -Way Anoka, Chisago and Washington Counties 2 �I� 4ok 'CIL GvG'�� 4C• SSeSS�� �O yh6orAae, !1 e!' �2 601^ �o� Lc1l X62 /20rn es L�aZ- Cow f rD �i`ri�S ll�a�� tole f /r2r.`��Dn�. l �! one, � �5��o1b�as -c� /Ylore--a7i� r7 ei'y�16or�1ooc�.. 1 7. 7/zos ee%�2q rnee�i.J �c L�rr/a��e�n�Lde��sr'oo GiJcS �d jor�ss our /clan r Iry �- rep�'� h6or�ood— n� 6 ^aiitu. Qe5 0 ?J `d1a �L yaro u1CJ . y �' B WYMAN PLACE EDINA, MINNESOTA /" �4 al� Nw - Or S 4. T. NB.0. x, / 1 Or LOT 1. fILOcK ]-. wB.a r_____1. 1 s YN° PF_ \ (FALL! Or OCAmU& Ca19MIlE0 Lax L _ T- I BSa! I PER mF9) r)� °•••.ol ���- - vealTLaocx7 1 TT, DL le 1 Bs 1C� 1 / . S.; .' ' r . {0.Bw 1� SWOm • I I I FFxor awl xil 1 � Inil2 R - fe n a al � ®I 1 w . Ba2 1 ^ '1- R WD IS PUMP J 1 -__! hY a.N>l veil{.. {t 1 NB.{ ' �' � /' �� I `•, I W.o .snot 1 I wB7 / \ I I 1 \I w9.7� Ayy.7$ . a aYS=caw 1 \T I I n .47i 1 o,n °46 B49.e �9•9 s ° 1 1 Bso.o. I I nl /'I 9 UxE o< w[ Y 7a rL v NzG lp/Ij �4 al� Tau an R Bxio Bran JB3a{ 1 w48/ 1N '� j 1 Or LOT 1. fILOcK ]-. wB.a r_____1. 1 s YN° PF_ \ Bsal I I L _ T- I BSa! I L kill 1^ L, r)� °•••.ol ���- - vealTLaocx7 1 TT, DL le BENCHMARK #1 �1 1 �7 veal / . S.; .' ' r . {0.Bw 1� SWOm • I I I FFxor awl xil I O 4 I � Inil2 R - / W a I I °t I 1 I _ 'ic `Il R x me or LPT 1. a0D(= sB' ,1 •'' I , u ] E PC P T IRO -4 - -- IT 1 IwBB �� \�''y .wa.e RES�GDa'. NOaTy.E e►1 yl�_- Esc, j4,p2251� ` B{a] y . -a la waf. Na4 I C� I I 41.970 50. FT. I I I r L ' wBT go 30 yy v4i Or rt-L07 n 1 LOat 7 l- I 1 .wail I sLBEdr_ I \ I I :... I .lo.] nn•. f � albec -lo r, \ m aoml°o°222 -- --- --501- --- I -__! hY a.N>l veil{.. {t 1 NB.{ ' �' � /' �� I `•, I W.o .snot 1 I wB7 / \ I I 1 \I w9.7� Ayy.7$ . a aYS=caw 1 \T I I n .47i 1 o,n °46 B49.e �9•9 s ° 1 1 Bso.o. I I nl /'I 9 UxE o< w[ Y 7a rL v NzG lp/Ij �4 al� Tau an R Bxio Bran JB3a{ 1 w48/ 1N '� j 1 Or LOT 1. fILOcK ]-. wB.a r_____1. 1 s YN° PF_ \ Bsal I I L _ T- I BSa! I �.. ek �- r)� °•••.ol ���- - vealTLaocx7 1 TT, DL le .� i - mLL WP asd -I-- / . S.; .' ' r . {0.Bw 1� SWOm • I I I FFxor awl xil I O 4 I � W 1/4 aaRNEII 21 / •� i � : °'°0I` .13 Ta ASX 14 v fj� I I °t I 1 I - - - Denotes overhead Utilities I - »- - Denotes Storm Sewer line = 75 ft -. - Denotes Existing Fence as noted -.) •_!j. ^.. I $T I �IBxiO i/ 1R A91 It `•' I I L 1 2 I 1 t - Denotes Existing 1 Ft. Contour PROPOSED ZONING: R -1 Na4 I C� I I 41.970 50. FT. I I I I •axis y I Or rt-L07 n 1 LOat 7 l- I 1 .wail I sLBEdr_ I \ I I :... //�4 %/J ,a.�J'A :'• � -- 12.450 12.45050. FT. aAI wail f� p YU2 / ow Hwy. 62. o Bxi•<�wae _TEU NN 1. {T -0.1- -- r- �B,fl� -� 1 -• BM� ', ? / 1e TR Al ` IDYE 1 I ; °4ae A!H ,0 we.a N .s All EXISTING HOUSE tR ASX „ I I ` .41 5307 63RD 5T. W. azo- i 90.7 xi.. FFE =1951.2 �� / Prnpoam Dr.— ens uouy [en.,nml Iyn > s,ax I I " .24&1 OWNER: JAPES T RUTHERFORD TRUSTEE PIDy051 1621110M \ g {a7 1 /- Z�- - V - - - -J I T J sou ce_ � IN �B4¢L: li-�L wB.a i 'ems �� as R. .00° I[xeE s Bey! L EXISTING ; R GARAQE .el142.e LINE a N LxlE Or THE P w u_e_< • B4).e I I ?` , La.. a 7 3.7 0 i o ; ,J re IT 1 w6> 9 I l Elu �� I I ° w a 1.7/ B4).) B4a9 -!cal 75.1 wa] 1411 1J _ J 241.85 f ` I'� e24 IT s m / N89-51-1 yr3t A !! I I > �P4a` \ Y I em] PRaPERTr lei EXISTING Tr < � � _- 3Vl`� we] � -s-•tl ✓S lc! GMAC�j d} / / Na) LOT 4= GU�� - - - - -� K 1 I 1 f 'Sa2 3 1 st --arI 1 'THEN 7! FT. K - 14,487 50. FT. ' Lol 1, elan TT _L.__ �- TR uARL ]] - JI --- --- 3e.x - - -f 9xis -rAu °160aBxie I 40..4 Na4 lA A!N ; .4 11 {A't 848.7 1 B_B4a1 ^�_�1 a; IBa6a wAU rAUa s a lnF IBd uoi¢ ea t1's I N4 6 -9,1f I 1C B410 nl `I I I � I IN B v 1 I I LIJ B4lP N).] v 1 LIJ ale � I � Oo wl7a.l 1 -- a AI 2 L I I Of We I I I I �6 1 to If 1 C -'1 .1 � I 4tt� I I I I 1 s� I 1 I 1 I n YAB1F ]q 47.3 1 1 I 1 Nz1 sae.. I I I EXISTING HORSE 6316 WARREN AVE. - Denotes Hennepin County .YS03 Zo:WW ¢n m °sal m 1 .w7 F134 ore e 4^ ¢0 lw Ely xi mLL WP asd Bxio - LOT 3. ®tic, --- --- 3e.x - - -f 9xis -rAu °160aBxie I 40..4 Na4 lA A!N ; .4 11 {A't 848.7 1 B_B4a1 ^�_�1 a; IBa6a wAU rAUa s a lnF IBd uoi¢ ea t1's I N4 6 -9,1f I 1C B410 nl `I I I � I IN B v 1 I I LIJ B4lP N).] v 1 LIJ ale � I � Oo wl7a.l 1 -- a AI 2 L I I Of We I I I I �6 1 to If 1 C -'1 .1 � I 4tt� I I I I 1 s� I 1 I 1 I n YAB1F ]q 47.3 1 1 I 1 Nz1 sae.. I I I EXISTING HORSE 6316 WARREN AVE. - Denotes Hennepin County SJ - Demotes Gas Miller - FFWARREN.0 _.,� ,cans e B4R OWNER: DOUGUS dr - Denote. Set Iron Pipe, Marked AL9a lIS V IDtE O 1XE" I - - - ATHLEEN SHOENAKERV, P10#0411621220096 Sao] 1P / - - - - - - - - - - - - / � a -o]no - Denotes Existing Spot ElewoUon W 1/4 aaRNEII 21 / I pia.. YGa7 / - f I w)P� r- - - - - I I <P I ��n 1 as I C> I F C] I << I I a� cJ I om . on LiJ - 7 I << 77y31 I- -iN Ll �re or �m I a- I on I I I • B�a. I 0.EB - Denotes Hennepin County SJ - Demotes Gas Miller - Monument, as noted ,II NOR IAX�anu ar�o meals �' 1 e B4R O - Denote. Set Iron Pipe, Marked AL9a lIS V IDtE O 1XE" I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I I a�N0.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Denotes Sanitary Manhole � a -o]no - Denotes Existing Spot ElewoUon W 1/4 aaRNEII 21 I 846.4 - Denotes Television Box S 4. T. It 21 ' C_I WON Itl .0.7) I I 1 I PAR= &WBIR)WAM (PO Schedule A of Till, Commitment No. HB- 26717, with a commitmml data at September 4, 2013, It 7:00 A.Y., prepared by Custom Heine BuBeer, title, U.C. as beahq agent to Stewart Title Guaranty Company) Let 1, c l the North 75 lest the, I, all of Lot 2 and that part of Lot 3 lying Northerly of a II.. runnh9 from °point F the East II es of wkl Lot 3. distant 14 (eel South of the Northeast c n<r thereof to a Delnl H the Weill line of °aid Let J dialant 18 feel South of the Northwest corner thereof, oil h Block 7, Normandole Second Addlllan . That part of the North 7100 feet of Lot 1. Block 7, 'NOnnondole Second Addition; which ties Southerly of the following deWlbed line: Commencing at the Southeast corner of the North 75.00 feel of aid Lol 1; thence North 0 degrees, 00 minutes, 49 ...ends East, along the East Imo of sold Lot 1, dot-,. f 4333 feel to the beghnin u of the line to be dencrbedr thence Northerly and WmIMY distance of 30.28 (vet don tongenllof cu to the left, hawing a thus of 16.30 feet and o central anal, of 108 dw9n,: 26 minutes. 18 ...ands; thmca Saulh 73 depre 134 minutes, 31 seconds Weal. tanpenl to vestal carve, a dalonce of 27.1+ feet then.. South 71 de re.. 59 mhutei 20 ands We,t a dislorae of 129.71 feel; thence We,lerly along o curve. con aw to the North hating a radus of 454.78 feel to the Southwest corner of the North 75.00 feel of said Let 1, and said line Me, tennhulmg, Hennepin County, Mhnaseta AND (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. HB -267M with a commitment data of September 4, 2013, at 7.00 A.M., prepmed by Cualem Home Builders Tiva. U.C. as imirn agent Bor Stewart Title LLoranty Company) That pot of Lot 3 lying Southerly of a Imo rennhg icon a point m III. Eml line of weld Let 3, distort 14 feel South of the Northeast omer thereaf to o Pohl m the West the of said Lot 3. distant 18 feel South of the Northwest corner thereof, and the North 20 feel of lot 4. Block 7. 'Normandale Second Addition(. according to the recorded Plot thereof. Hennepin C-tA Winnow (Abstract Property) GOVOW AV 1) The field work for the surwy woo completed an January 7. 2014. 2) Bearings Mown herein are based an the West the of the Nerthwast Ouorlar of Section 4, Township, 116, Range 21, which In assumed to ben 502'14'13'E. 3) Surveyed property addressee - 6304 a 6312 Worm Avenue, Edina, UN 55439. 4) Surveyed property Cenlama t38.907 sq. FL (ta89 eves). 5) Abew, ground utilities ham been field located a, ahown. NI underground locations shown herein ore APPROXIMATE Prior to any e.cawliona or digging, contact Gopher State One Call for on on-wile location (651- 454 - 0002). 6) Dua to nor and winter motion,. on.addthnal wife As t may be needed in the spring to locate additional bnpre wle which may net haw been V.ibk at the time of away 7) Restricted Access per Dm. Na 5154438 will need to he released. LEGEND VICINITY MAP 0 - Denotes Hennepin County SJ - Demotes Gas Miller - Monument, as noted • - Denotes Found Monument, as noted O - Denote. Set Iron Pipe, Marked `a - Denotes Utility Pole with RLS 40361 $ - Denotes Light Pole R - Denotes Miaceilaneoua Manhole - Denotes Sanitary Manhole ,soma - Denotes Existing Spot ElewoUon 1 - Denotes Existing Tree - Denotes Television Box Cr - Denote Fire Hydrant A - Denotes Gate Valve O - Denotes Electric Box SJ - Demotes Gas Miller - ® - Denotes Catch Basin SITE TTL E DATA g - Denotes Electric Male, `a - Denotes Utility Pole TOTAL PARCEL AREA -+38,907 sq. ft. Lot 1 12,450 sq. ft. R - Denotes Miaceilaneoua Manhole Lot 2 11,970 sq. ft. - - - - - - Denotes Underground Electric Lot 3 14,487 sq. ft. - •- - - Denotes Overhead Utility TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 3 -I- moin - Denotes water - - - - - >- - Denotes Sanitary Sewer AVERAGE LOT AREA 12,969 sq. ft. - - - Denotes overhead Utilities Minimum Lot Width at 50 ft. from front lot - »- - Denotes Storm Sewer line = 75 ft -. - Denotes Existing Fence as noted Minimum Lot Depth at midpoint of lot = 135 ft. - Denotes Concrete Surface Minimum Lot Area m 9,446 sq. ft. O - Ee Iii Bituminous Surface EXISTING ZONING: R -1 - Denotes Existing 1 Ft. Contour PROPOSED ZONING: R -1 - Denotes Existing 5 Ft. Contour UTILITIES AVAILABLE N PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS. BEING 5' ADJACENT TO SIDE LOT LINES AND 10' ADJACENT TO FRONT OR REAR LOT LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND DEN070 ON THIS PLAT. BENCHMARKS 1. Disk located on the SE w1n9.dl of bridge ow Hwy. 62. m 10 7O 40 =1 951.59 (NGVD 29) 2. Tap nut of hydrant located 3212 f. wait of the NW clam. of the subject property. (IN FEET) EI-- 939.39 (NGVD 29) CALL BEFORE YOU tl0 Joe Know whars below. Call before you dig. SHEET INDEX 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS & PRELIMINARY PLAT 2. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 3. PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN Li. PRELIMARY LANDSCAPE PLAN v oLn Z 1 O• IW In A N Y 4ZII 1J J 2 0 O O W � IT N � U 3 o, N O v _ o to C O W a C Q 0 L m a N 40 z FO W a� Uo of ga z a c Ca U zz 2 0 to ` z L } W N 3 w w aLU U J J LU (A M F C Ln Q Q VI ay ~ Y Wn'i o F Ln _ fn i O z REVISIONS 1. Per dry comments. 02/12/14 2. 3. 4. S. 6. DRAWN BY: NISS 4 RMEWED 6Y: TIM ee1 ISSUE DATE: 01/13/14 Y R I hereby certify lhel this survey. Olen or report was preps 1 by me arsu^deer my i direct p. nd that I duly Licensed Inn. Sunmyar under the laws of Me State of Nlnnesoln. , Name: Thomas A. Ballot! / Slgnalure: Date: 01/13 14 Llcen9e W: 40361 i 1 of 3 I CONNECT TO EX. MH CORE DRILL & INSTALL WATER TIGHT SEAL i (REFORM INV.) EX. INV 938.5 (FIELD VERIFY) 1 1 I ax INV 8368 1 91 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS (TYP.) t. REMOVE & REPLACE EX. STREET SECTION ,�I'�- IN KIND I 949.8 9ry t, '4.n- N SETBACK LINE -. CURB (IN FEET) SAWCUT O CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER •9 FENCE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LIGHT POLE I \ �I ❑ I � I TELEVL90N BOX S POWER POLE `Z 1 I I I I I I ,d CK I I I I EXISTING I I I I HOUSE / I i I •— — — — — — — Ij I 1 I 0" it I I I I :✓ i .. INFILTRATION SWALE lil / • � EXISTING SHED 1 I EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING HOUSE I I I I I EXISTING SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TYP.) LOCATIONS SHOWN PER CITY I T AS- BILLETS. SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE N SETBACK LINE 20 40 CURB (IN FEET) SAWCUT O CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER WATER MAD! WETLAND FENCE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LIGHT POLE ELECTRIC BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX TELEVL90N BOX S POWER POLE `Z J, I ,d CK I I I I I i I I I I :✓ i .. I I I I I L RELOCATE USE EX. SERVICE I 'N I EXISTING o OVERHEAD I i ELECTRIC i IM I I 3 es{o � O 4 2 25' REAR SETBACK 4 — EXISTING I w EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING HOUSE I I I I I EXISTING SEWER & WATER SERVICE (TYP.) LOCATIONS SHOWN PER CITY I T AS- BILLETS. SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE N SETBACK LINE 20 40 CURB (IN FEET) SAWCUT O CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER WATER MAD! WETLAND FENCE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LIGHT POLE ELECTRIC BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX TELEVL90N BOX S POWER POLE `Z SINGLE FAMILY LOT (75' MINIMUM WIDTH 25' REAR SETBACK — SIDE YARD SETBACKS GARAGE 10 Fr. HOUSE 10 FT. .CORNER: 35 Fr. . REWIRED TO MATCH SETBACK OF ADJACENT HOUSE 30' FRONT SETBACK TYPICAL SERVICES SHALL BE: WATER: 1' COPPER TYPE K SEWER: 4' PVC j1 D I I I T I I 1 I I I I I I t 1 I I I I I I I I T . BENCHMARKS L1--- -- --- - -I?—I ,. DI,X located on Ble SE anDywal of bridge E-3— Hyy. 62 Eop r 661.59 (NG'W 29) 2 of red of omen Me eL 3212 R or t EI - 0 39 ( of Me tyeJeet properly �w.o 939.39 (NGVD 29) WARNING! UNDERGROUND UTeITIES CALL BEFORE GIGGING CALL BEFORE YOU DIG - • • O 1 Know whars below. Call before you dig. om Ln U1 Ln in 1 O•�j N M Yep z O X ,I c fD w : z z 00 Vm=� D) ° i, Ln \� z r, 5 p W ai a p ¢ L Co a v N Z 5 a J W �~. U g0 co a W Z� � } c cee 3 L„ Q N J W W a J J W Vi Z a, , t• c Ln Q>z aye Q Ln c Q.-4 Td Ln n UJI to = W x O Z REVISIONS 1. P dty mmmenb. 02/12/14 2. 3. 5. 6. DRAWN BV: 1DH DESIGNED By: BSI( 8 ISSUE DATI:: 01/13/13 S i 1 b—b, =FV Me. Nb plan, epedflm0on r repo' waa prepared by me or uMer my YYY dlred tup"""" and Nat 1 em a duly Urtn,el pmfeabrel EmInec undo Me law,'e Ue state of He Name: Brian 1. Krystaflalt, P.E. C �/���� � /— S SIpIHINre: a Date: 02/13/23 U—se a: 25063 s i 2 of 3 a N 0 10 20 40 (IN FEET) CALL BEFORE YOU DIG - • • O 1 Know whars below. Call before you dig. om Ln U1 Ln in 1 O•�j N M Yep z O X ,I c fD w : z z 00 Vm=� D) ° i, Ln \� z r, 5 p W ai a p ¢ L Co a v N Z 5 a J W �~. U g0 co a W Z� � } c cee 3 L„ Q N J W W a J J W Vi Z a, , t• c Ln Q>z aye Q Ln c Q.-4 Td Ln n UJI to = W x O Z REVISIONS 1. P dty mmmenb. 02/12/14 2. 3. 5. 6. DRAWN BV: 1DH DESIGNED By: BSI( 8 ISSUE DATI:: 01/13/13 S i 1 b—b, =FV Me. Nb plan, epedflm0on r repo' waa prepared by me or uMer my YYY dlred tup"""" and Nat 1 em a duly Urtn,el pmfeabrel EmInec undo Me law,'e Ue state of He Name: Brian 1. Krystaflalt, P.E. C �/���� � /— S SIpIHINre: a Date: 02/13/23 U—se a: 25063 s i 2 of 3 a I - - - -- I - - -- L - - - icm -w2c \ -- I t v< Iltassp \ la, I I I aa.a l -99 7 a— ✓ 952.5 EASEMENT LINE - - - - -_ •� /�qna/ � I / I L t0 R — 3RD MANE 31 R 3 t/ cat SANITARY SEW f asl� Ic STORM SEWER - - - - - »- —»— / WATER MAIN /`PRDIFCnOH \ —�— pSa A-YAPIe 3 - "'" r \ e'.• BTORM CATCH BASIN i \ a4g7 /u,wlF to \' "'/ ' • EXIN�% HOUSE STIG /J %� \ I 1 .•J Y 10N "' m 000w000 20\ 'J 1 I GATE VALVE DA wMI5 I 4810 !`� 0000000 0 � ! 0000`000 0000 - - - -, IJ J oDi o le o I, 13 - - -1-� \1R -,a GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 59.4-- - - - - -- 50.5 BLOCK NUMBER DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY EASEMENT I J C I LOT NUMBER I SURFACE DRAINAGE I HOUSE TYPES I —R—RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY EXISnuc GARAGE. PA INFILTRATION BASIN SEED WITH MIX TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT. GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO— RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT B BUILDING ENTRY WALKOUT GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP SLD—SIDE LOOKOUT I. {.1{ {"1. Cr �'N'•1�j - WO— RAMBLER WALKOUT N. _':;, {;VT•' —I RECOMMENDED I 0 I SW� -SIDE RAMBLER WALKOUT I� — ' GARAGE SIDE I (.` 88 / 1 1 LI I h FINISHED ELEVATION _ - J 4.4 DENOTES STEP CONDITION IN FEE O LOT CORNER ( P�LAM]yyyE IUyM]By El}l YE]}IUy FSTREET TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MDDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2005) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 250 AT 70 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPUM AT MICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 24 -12 -24 AT 300 POUNDS PER ACRE. Q ` ' (�T 1 1 'L L 1 70% HOMOGENEOUS SAND 30% ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST SUBSOLS TO BE SUBCUT DOWN TO EXISTING GRANULAR SOILS AND BACKFILLED WITH ONSITE GRANULAR MATERIALS. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. MODIFIED LOOKOUT NO SCALE Q S VARIES BACK) . 40• � I 1 sR 1 FINISHED GRADE 10' GRADING GRADE n ____ I __ _____ 10' 0 0 0.5' MN. 1 -- i ITOPSOL TOPSOIL -.DROP GRADE AT REAR 2' FOR DAYLIGHT WINDOWS (WINDOW WELL) / 111 uA EX 46 1 i uAHL Iff R LLJ d' 3 \ to b� E &GM) - I •�i' !1 \a 1 i� I G, 952.5 EASEMENT LINE - - - - -_ _ - - - -- axi 7 CURB U - - - - -- 7'e t0 R — 3RD MANE 31 R 3 t/ cat SANITARY SEW f asl� Ic STORM SEWER - - - - - »- —»— / WATER MAIN /`PRDIFCnOH \ —�— pSa A-YAPIe 3 - "'" •'• I to BTORM CATCH BASIN i \ a4g7 /u,wlF to \' "'/ ' • /ice' • I I I I____�'I__ -- / 1R Y.VL! to : ' "' m 000w000 20\ 'J 1 I GATE VALVE DA TELEVISION BOX O � • 1 I RN D. 3e YADIE le �iF � � ae•yt RETAINING WALL -9162 I wMI5 I 4810 !`� 0000000 0 � ! 0000`000 0000 - - - -, IJ J oDi o le o I, 13 - - -1-� \1R -,a GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 59.4-- - - - - -- 50.5 BLOCK NUMBER DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY EASEMENT I J C I LOT NUMBER I SURFACE DRAINAGE I HOUSE TYPES I —R—RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY EXISnuc GARAGE. PA INFILTRATION BASIN SEED WITH MIX TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT. GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO— RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT B BUILDING ENTRY WALKOUT GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP SLD—SIDE LOOKOUT I. {.1{ {"1. Cr �'N'•1�j - WO— RAMBLER WALKOUT N. _':;, {;VT•' —I RECOMMENDED I 0 I SW� -SIDE RAMBLER WALKOUT I� — ' GARAGE SIDE I (.` 88 / 1 1 LI I h FINISHED ELEVATION _ - J 4.4 DENOTES STEP CONDITION IN FEE O LOT CORNER ( P�LAM]yyyE IUyM]By El}l YE]}IUy FSTREET TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MDDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2005) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 250 AT 70 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPUM AT MICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 24 -12 -24 AT 300 POUNDS PER ACRE. Q ` ' (�T 1 1 'L L 1 70% HOMOGENEOUS SAND 30% ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST SUBSOLS TO BE SUBCUT DOWN TO EXISTING GRANULAR SOILS AND BACKFILLED WITH ONSITE GRANULAR MATERIALS. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. MODIFIED LOOKOUT NO SCALE Q S VARIES BACK) . 40• � I 1 sR 1 FINISHED GRADE 10' GRADING GRADE n ____ I __ _____ 10' 0 0 0.5' MN. 1 -- i ITOPSOL TOPSOIL -.DROP GRADE AT REAR 2' FOR DAYLIGHT WINDOWS (WINDOW WELL) / 111 uA EX 46 1 i uAHL Iff R LLJ d' 3 \ b� E &GM) - EXISTING •�i' !1 \a 1 i� I G, 952.5 EASEMENT LINE - - - - -_ _ - - - -- m7.4 CURB U - - - - -- 7'e BITUMINOUS [- -] MANE 31 t;,m t/ cat SANITARY SEW STORM SEWER - - - - - »- —»— WATER MAIN /`PRDIFCnOH \ 1a DY to � -V I ,a I I BTORM CATCH BASIN � / I /• I I MANHOLE + G 9520 HYDRANT V GATE VALVE DA TELEVISION BOX O TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE w. RETAINING WALL G 952-0 - 614 I I R I 10' CONTOUR — — — 2' CONTOUR - - -- a FEMA FLOOD PLAIN - — WETLAND LINE - - -� CZ SPOT ELEVATION rz FIT: Eu SILT FEN Z TREE REMOVED I I - I I E.O.F. I EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I R 000.0 GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION TREE ENTRANCE `\ (WN950 I I SWELL) "4�'q/ (WINDOW WELL) j Y" (WINDOW WELL) 950.0 °. I I I y Id' 950.0 II � , TA ASH b • �1+ I to + �I .4lp� I„ 11 /.,y�r% I 13 � �4 wMI5 I 4810 !`� 0000000 0 � ! 0000`000 0000 - - - -, IJ J oDi o le o I, 13 - - -1-� \1R -,a GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 59.4-- - - - - -- 50.5 BLOCK NUMBER DRAINAGE 8 UTILITY EASEMENT I J C I LOT NUMBER I SURFACE DRAINAGE I HOUSE TYPES I —R—RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY EXISnuc GARAGE. PA INFILTRATION BASIN SEED WITH MIX TOLERANT OF INUNDATION AND DROUGHT. GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO— RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT B BUILDING ENTRY WALKOUT GRASS PRE - TREATMENT STRIP SLD—SIDE LOOKOUT I. {.1{ {"1. Cr �'N'•1�j - WO— RAMBLER WALKOUT N. _':;, {;VT•' —I RECOMMENDED I 0 I SW� -SIDE RAMBLER WALKOUT I� — ' GARAGE SIDE I (.` 88 / 1 1 LI I h FINISHED ELEVATION _ - J 4.4 DENOTES STEP CONDITION IN FEE O LOT CORNER ( P�LAM]yyyE IUyM]By El}l YE]}IUy FSTREET TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MDDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (2005) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 250 AT 70 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPUM AT MICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 24 -12 -24 AT 300 POUNDS PER ACRE. Q ` ' (�T 1 1 'L L 1 70% HOMOGENEOUS SAND 30% ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST SUBSOLS TO BE SUBCUT DOWN TO EXISTING GRANULAR SOILS AND BACKFILLED WITH ONSITE GRANULAR MATERIALS. THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL NOT BE COMPACTED. MODIFIED LOOKOUT NO SCALE Q S VARIES BACK) . 40• � I 1 sR 1 FINISHED GRADE 10' GRADING GRADE n ____ I __ _____ 10' 0 0 0.5' MN. 1 -- i ITOPSOL TOPSOIL -.DROP GRADE AT REAR 2' FOR DAYLIGHT WINDOWS (WINDOW WELL) / 111 uA EX 46 1 i uAHL Iff R LLJ d' 3 \ b� E &GM) - EXISTING PROPOSED T PROPERTY LINE — To EASEMENT LINE - - - - -_ _ - - - -- m7.4 CURB U - - - - -- 7'e BITUMINOUS [- -] CONCRETE - [ '_' -Z -> : cat SANITARY SEW STORM SEWER - - - - - »- —»— WATER MAIN /`PRDIFCnOH OVERHEAD UTILITY — _• r 1` BTORM CATCH BASIN j STORM MANHOLE MANHOLE HYDRANT V GATE VALVE DA TELEVISION BOX O TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE w. RETAINING WALL FENCE — • — • — 10' CONTOUR — — — 2' CONTOUR - - -- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN - — WETLAND LINE - - -� CZ SPOT ELEVATION rz 00'0 SILT FEN TREE REMOVED (STANDARD DTL � 2000 - (TYP•) TREELINE iYWI E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ab X ** 000.0 GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION TREE ENTRANCE \• ). I I SUBGRADE CORRECTION SELECT BACKFILL J MATERIAL COMPACTED BAO(FILL NON -SELECT SACKFlLL MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFlLL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2- CLEAR ROCK (MIN.) SILT FENCE Iob OPENING FABRIC (36• MAX. < 212 ANCHOR W/ METAL OPENING IN FABRIC WEAVE < 212 Pm T -POST OR WOOD 2'X2• STAKE fi•X6' TRENCH DIREC71ON OF FLOW (COMPACTED BACKFILLj AS NOTED \n�•�(p I —I I D s .. 7' aTr I UNDISTURBED SOIL NOTES: 1. DIG A 6•X6' TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED SILT FENCE LINE. FO TOPSOIL GRADING GRADE 2. DRIVE ALL ANCHOR POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. ARIES 00• PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE 3. POSTS.SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART. 4. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE ANCHOR POSTS AND BACK FILL 6•Y6' TRENCH. EXISTING GRADE 5. SECURELY ATTACH SILT FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF THREE ATTACHMENTS PER POST. — 6. SEE NNDOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 k BENCHMARKS \ / LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION 1. Disk located on the SE wingwM of arldge SELECT BACKFlLL � ow Hwy 62 MATERIAL SS 9�-P•( \� Ben= BS1S9 (NGVD 29) CPQ�Dyf \ <J M/ 2. Top nut of hydrant located *212 IL west of the NW cona of the object property. MAXL� Y49.7 - NON- SELECT BACKFlLL MATERIAL Ben° 939.39 (NCO 29) COMPACTED BACJ(F7LL N 3.0' MAX ION' YIN. BOTTOM OF- UNSTABLE MATERIAL WARNING! UNDERGROUND UTAITIE9 0 10 20 40 CALL BEFORE DIGGING (IN FEET) CALL BEFOFIE YOU DIG • o Know whars below. Call before you dig. a In Ln In rn n t �_ W� O• > N to N Y t0 H� O X w J LL z W00 Utz �C' GO 40_1 7 O N � Z � M DID 5 p w O N d C o .r- GO a N Z O H ce W a Z Ug za O Z a U M J W W IL Q N o CL J a C c r 3W U J fn J LU tri Z 0 to F C Ln Qaz at . QL"n c LLI Q Ln aL FLn= W 2 IREVISIONS 1. Perrltymmmentx 02/12/14 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. DMWN BY: 1DH DESIGNED BY: 01K ISSUE DATE: 041]/13 I Mmb/ mrtOY lean thN Plan, spetlBmUm Gr port was -p.nad W me or under my reIr t supeM9m and Nat I am a duly Ucamed Pmfa lanal Elglnea undo tM laws of U,e 5teh of NW,esob Name: Brian3.10- tofia1c,P.FE Slgn.w.: Q_ ;p Date: 01/13 13 License t: 25063 3 3 'LEGALDESCREMON !PROPERTYOWNER IADDRESS AREA (Sq.FL)IWIDTH(FL) DEPTH(FL) LEGALDESCRRMON PROPERTYOWNER jADDRESS AREA (Sq. FL) jWEDTH(FL) ,DEKH(FL) U, BI, EBICKSONS NORMANDALEADD. (Barry &Susan Caress 16329Mildrcd Avenue 8,767 .65.0 1135.0 L3, BI, RICHARD R WNDCRFN ADDITION Mare T.Sarackharrer 6344Warren Avenue •8,991 i75D 120.0 'IABI, HAWKINSONADDITION !Jerry Hickson 16325 Mildred Avenue 8,431 !625 :135.0 L2, B I, RICHARD R UNDQtFN ADDITION James Magoffin 634OWarren Aveaue '6336WerrenAveaue Sy94 X75.0 175.0 1200 110.0 'U,BI,HAWKIN.SONADDIPION 'ElirabethStedurn 16321 Mildred Avenue 8,429 !625 435.0 L1,BI,RHCHARDRLUNDCtENADDIION LmdaHoR La &S Ill L7, B7, NORMANDALE2ND ADDI Javier Chavez 16328 Warren Avenue .8.997 13,890 600 '2310 LA, BI, JIAWKINSONAMITION (Paul &Rachel Eierent 6317 Mildred Avenue �', 6313 Mildred Avenue 8,429 8,431 1625 1625 135.0 .135.0 S20'L6& N 40 L7, B7, NORMANDALE2ND. Howard &Diode Olson !6324Wanen Avenue 14A78 ;600 '233.1 I3,BI,HAWKINSONADDITLON IRrley &Iaura Brost L2, BI, HAW'KINSON ADDITION (Richard &Janie Katz 16309Mildmd Avenue 10,116 175D 135D S 2 IS& N 30' LA B7, NORMANDALE 2ND . Paul & Margaret Schroeder i63?O Wartcn Avenue 13,OfY) .55.0 216.1 U,BI,HAW'KINSONADDI770N Rachel Wenham 16305Mildred Avenue 10.116 i75D 135.0 530 LA& N 2S 15, B7. NORMANDALE 2ND . Douglas & Katherine Shoermker 16316 Warren Avenue I3,IS5 ;350 2405 L29, B5, NORMANDALE2ND ADD. I Benjamin & lade Reed 16701 Mildred Avenue - 12,453 191A . 135.0 That part of U tying Sexy of a fine drum N(M"ehelle Larrben ! 6712 Warren Avenue 13,023 1500 241.9 •U3& 14, BrA NORMANDALE2ND ADD. I David &Jacks Bey i6348 Mildred Avenue 11488 lIODA :135.0 L2& that pad lying Nedy ofa fine dmsm..NC Richard (Rover !6304 Warren Avenue 25,666 :105A I150D '2020 101.8 U2 &S1/2ofU1. K NORMANDALE2ND A Erik& Jessica Forston !6344Mrldred Avenue 10,116 i75D I 135.0 LA BI, RICHARD R UlND(REN ADDITION John &Andma Schlosser 16337 Holbom Avenue 15,285 1953 LAO & Nlrl ofU 1. B6, NORMANDALE 2ND A &£Real 6tare LLC 6336 Mildred Avenue 10.116 175. 135.0 LS, B I, RICHARD R UINDORIEN ADDJrION Jeffery & D'eue Roberts Mulliniz 'Jason &kcn ;527264th Street I530D 64th Street 14,310 8.587 !660 .150.0 129.9 L8, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION ,Mary Eider '6332 Mildred Avenue 6,744 �S00 135.0 U3 NORMANDAIE 3RD ADDITION niferChrisioansen 1530464th Serest 8,584 -129.9 M B6, NORMANDAUE2ND ADDITION 'Joseph 0du '6328 Wddmd Avenue 6,744 ;50.0 135.0 LM NORMANDALE 3RD ADDTRON Esites &James Wad Whiting Avenue 7.593 158.7 iSV 129.9 U. BB, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION ,lanes VeumH.1 ;6324Mildred Avenue 6,744 150.0 '135.0 UNORMANDAIE3RDADDITION Jon &Sarah Nyun .5301 1 5365 Whiting Avenue 85M !660 1299 L6, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION IBenjsrrmr Osa '6320 Mildred Aveaue 6744 1500 . 135.0 L2 NORMANDALE3RD ADDITION ETrut &JcnaiferlOone 15309 Whiting Avenue 8577 660 129.9 L5, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION 'Hamideh Rahimi.- 6316Mildred Avenue 6 ,744 1500 135.0 U NORMANDALE 3RD, ADDITION Hang T. Hardie 15313 Whiting Avenue 8,581 1660 1129.9 LA, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION 1Mcchael &Catherine Cold 6312 Mildred Avenue 6,743 ,50.0 135.0 1A NORMANDALE 3RD ADDITION Cynthia &All Johns on 15317 Whiting Avenue 8,583 !660 129.9 AAKNORMANDADE2NDADDITION Mateusz &MenaTrocki :6308MidredAvenue '6,743 500 1350 LSNORMANDALE3RDADDITION F &MUskavkch l 5300 Whiting Avenue 27,043 20 00 105.0 L2, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION (David &Lha Schedin '6704 Mildred Avenue 6,743 500 135.0 That pan ofUN of the.. E2, SAVORYADDri Arlene Savory 15300 Whiting Avenue 14,207 1900 .1500 U, B6, NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION Alm!Riddeli Truit :6300 Mildred Avenue 12,112 907 1350 LB &that pad ofl.7..132, SAVORYADDrf OP Arlene Savory Febbodt iMWWhitmg Avenue 13.543 1910 150.0 �U8, B6. NORMANDALE2ND ADDITION IAbaa RiddeBTrost ;6300 Mildred Avenue 11,862 !870 ,1350 That pad of L7& that pan..SAVORYADDIT Wayne L27 &NLrl of L24 B6, NORMANDALE2ND J Ted Pearson '6305Warren Avenue 10115 '75.0 ' :135.0 L&B2,SAVORYADDITHON Theodore Hohmn 1630 Rdgeviear Drive I63091tidgev'ew Drive 14.343 12,449 ;965 '850 .148.8 '1466 L25 &Slr2orl26 B6, NORMANDALE 2NDAJana Schmechel ;6303Worren Avenue 10.115 175.0 135.0 15,112.SAVORYADDITION WSrum &Kare.Castro '850 144.4 L24 &N 10 LA E14 NORMANDALE2ND AD Patricia Wheelock !6317 Warren Avenue 8,094 '600 -135.0 tA,B2, SAVORY ADDITION �ogory Rorruin ! 6305 Ridgeview Drive 12268 N 20122 &S40' L23, BG NORMANDADE2NI Kathy Olson 6321 Wenet Avenue 8,095 160.0 135.0 LIAZSAVORYADDITION Natalie Bicolt :6301 Ridgevew Drive 1530563rd 13,572 .95.0 11000 132.0 IISOD N 30121 &S30 L22, B6, NORMANDALE2N1 Michael O'Keefe '6327 Warren Avenue It= 160.0 135.0 L2XZSATORYADDITION R &JCnrlock Street 1530163rd Sweet 14,891 15,195 X995 1500 120 &S2V 121,B6, NORMANDALE 2ND AD h4argrct Wang& Michelle Michaelson •6333 Warren Ave... 9,446 1700 135.0 UXZSAVORYADDMONl !arms Rutherford '5370 Whiling Avenge 11,160 95.0 - 13QA U,BI, HARDACKERS ADDITION Johanna &Cemmdo De Avila 6337 Warren Avenue 8,091 16DD 135.0 DA.BI, SAVORY ADDITION Barry &Karca Lundgren 16308 Ridgevew Drive 10.]96 800 '130.0 L2, Bl, HARDACKERS ADDITION (Mark Nelson 6341 Warren Avenue 8,091 I(AA :135.0 l3,BI,SAVORYADDTI70N Susan Borneo 'John 16364 Ridgevew Drive 10j96 .80.0 1130.0 L3, Ill, HARDACKERS ADDITION 'Gorb Peterson Warren !6345 Wan Avenue MI 160D 135.0 67,111, SAVORY ADDITION &Ann Pollack 14782 '80.0 UII.O US &S20L16, B 6 NORMANDALE2ND AD Eric Faber 6355 Wave. Avenue 9,446 170.0 135.0 U,BI, SAVORY ADDITION Richard &Dina Sdek 6300Ridg.view Drive LA, BI, RICHARD R. LUNDGREN ADDITION Pete Ul a '6348 Warren Avenue 8,988 175.0 1200 - MEDIAN LOT WDTH MEAN LOT WIDTH MEDIAN LOT DEPTH MEAN LOT DEPTH 70.0 Fl. 74.4 Ft. 135.0 Fl. 143.6 Ft. MEDIAN LOT AREA MEAN LOT AREA 9,446 Sq.Ft. 10,669 Sq.Ft. v o rn In In In m n Cis 5Z= 2 - O♦ N n kD -j l0 Z O X � F� C N w J LL z (0 O O Z, O O r'i lT UM a a300 ~ W w IA `3 M D tD > V z O I� w p N d C Q L CO Il W N r H m U H j = J LU °o Z a° .rJ N In ocL:Q a� 0,2 0. a!E w L U Z W! r L LL C 0 2 0 Ln REVISIONS 1. Per city comments. 02/12/14 DRAWN BY. Ca I hereby certify to that this survey, plan or report was prepared by my or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Doled this 13th day of January, 2014. iQ," x�7 L4� Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. Reg. No. 40361 2 of 2 I IY a a D ; a e �� 4, � �p E E�y7 / I ( G_5 7 75 � �`pp �3 p nn IUD `11— Diu 4 ZDA AMI /r� y ydpp�,y'�[[ll{����p, I (p{¢� G o 6 -Rl"`� • t:l.nd 15 m suo jI ,`' r14 v d �.MS ,III U71M w iL • `\ 'iaN. JJ `, •� M1 Y1�� It: S B ,j (�[j' - 11 a5 . ' �RU �a � Edina, Minnesota 1R r R I � � 1 9 W _ . ``� 1 'lam W m � h7 : Inw W7! �pM I G 7• {'t' , r� a ,� 10114 �` ', �. t` ` %•' ram 1 _ _ I '14.•,5 t; p 3nc `- ..v 70� `ice Al 1 (l �--r- _ =— ' D Do w ~ uam 76 o- N� . .0 1 <,1N t° • �i 1 I t, 1 + i .5, i IITppr , - a ,• - LUii11 pp pp I� II�������`�` ppppp �� ��I�.ipp a0�'' IV�S9V61wl�et DOgiq 1 I f ' 1 `I, 1 1 - 7r "T6 10 II nWARRrW� ,y -N 1 I - HAR q 1 I r YO a/lA n -1_ 1.' E•1 T° GS r mD 'ie �� a '� F;1 I [ - a ru to m w I 1 I� 1 + 1 . 1 G' G I I � f aa.ea ' �, \'• .• N � ' � _i y��•y I � I / . --z _ I r p •• `I,JS m W N ab `-a A m 5a 50 fJ W b- =I -AVE -- - - - -s - - - - - -- - - -- ACI 41 \� I I _ o �I �- 0 2 O A n� Z OZ c� ~ > co *10 r M 3I = O O N O O O IY a a D ; a e �� 4, � �p E E�y7 / I ( G_5 7 75 � �`pp �3 p pLdt `11— Diu 4 /r� y ydpp�,y'�[[ll{����p, I (p{¢� G o 6 -Rl"`� • ENVIRONMENTAL • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING suo P) - •gy "°� f flt 2 2`5 I It: S B BLG 7 - 75 R RL^0 Edina, Minnesota Phone: 763 - 489 -7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 � � 1 9 W W W W m m W W7! 0 J o ; a e �� m t J N 500 FT. NEIGHBORHOOD, EXHIBIT for: Carlson )McCain `11— s 3 HOMESTEAD PARTNERS, LLC o ENVIRONMENTAL • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING suo WYMAN PLACE 248 Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Lino Lakes, MN 55014 IQ S - Edina, Minnesota Phone: 763 - 489 -7900 Fax: 763-489-7959 0 J To: Mayor and City Council From: Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: PUBLIC HEARING - Golf Course Operations Study w9�A� ,r SID Y 1 oe 1888 Agenda Item #: VI.B. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Action Requested: Provide direction to staff regarding the golf operations proposal including the recommended closing of Fred Richards Golf Course. Information / Background: In July 2013 staff began to study the operation of the City of Edina golf enterprise. The goal of the operational study was to make golf operations cover 100% of its operational costs including future bonding needs so that the city is able to improve its facilities to ensure our ability to provide high quality golf facilities along with superior service to our customers. The expectation in Edina has always been that the municipal golf operations would cover not only its own 'operation 1 expense, but also the expense of its own capital improvements. The`city currently has 45 holes of golf (27 regulation holes and 9 hole executive course at Braemar and the 9 hole Fred Richards Executive Course) with an operating budget of approximately $3.5 million. Staff began working on this project in the spring/summer of 2013. There were no pre- conceived ideas about how a goal of 100% cost recovery -would be, achieved. Staff hosted two public hearings to present the findings of the golf operations study and the accompanying staff recommendations. The first public hearing was held on January 30, 2014 at the Braemar Clubhouse. The second public hearing was held at the February 11, 2014 Park Board meeting. Over 300 residents were present at each public hearing. The notes from the January 30 meeting and unapproved minutes from the February I I Park Board meeting are attached. Staff has prepared financial pro formas through 2020 as part of the operational study. In 2013 golf operations recovered 86% of its costs. With no changes, it is anticipated that recovery would increase to 92% in 2014 and 2015 and decline steadily to 83% in 2020. In this "status quo" scenario, the city would invest $4.744 million between 2009 and 2020 in a golf enterprise with a declining cost recovery percentage. In 2020 the Golf Fund cash balance would be - $881,000. There would be no way to pay for golf improvements, assets would continue to decline and a continued significant subsidy from the liquor fund would be required. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 History In 2014 Braemar Golf Course will be celebrating its 50'h anniversary. In 1963 the city purchased the golf course. land for $500,000 and constructed the course for $1.3 million. In 1993 the Clunie nine was added at Braemar at a cost of approximately $3.5 million. The land for Fred Richards Executive Course (FREC) was purchased. in 1992 for $800,000. Total -cost for land and construction was $2.98 million and total cost including debt was $4.93 million. When the Clunie nine and Fred Richards Executive Courses were being considered, an estimate of golf rounds was prepared anticipating the number of rounds to be played at Edina's 45 hole municipal operation. (See Attachment B). It was anticipated that rounds would beat 122,000 in 1994, 140,000 in 1996 and level off at approximately 158,000 in 2001 through 2016. Projections were correct through 1998 at approximately 150,000. rounds, but then rounds declined annually to 1 12,000 in 2002 before leveling off at an average of 116,000 until 2009 when the economic downturn wreaked havoc in the golf,,industry. In 2010 101,000 rounds were played, and in 2011 and 2012 we.sold 96,000. In 2013 we sold 79;529 rounds, our worst year ever due to poor weather conditions. Nationally the number of rounds of golf declined from 501 million rounds in 2006 to 463 million in 2011. A great weather year- nationally in 2012 and the start of economic recovery helped in increase rounds to 486 million in 2012. (See Attachment A, National-Golf Round Statistics). This data was collected from the National Golf Foundation. In Edina the number of rounds played was fairly consistent from 2003.-to 2009 after peaking in 1998 and 1999. (See Attachment B, Edina Golf Statistics). The 1992 projection blue line showed the number of rounds. anticipated from 1994 through 2016 after the completion of the Fred Richards ..and Clunie additions. The Minneapolis /St. Paul metro area has 2610 holes of municipal golf, ranking 1 18`'' nationally with 1281 residents.per hole of golf. Only 13 of the 2451 municipal courses nationally have 45 or more holes of golf. Edina is one of the 13 municipal courses to have 45 holes of golf! In surrounding . communities, St, Louis Park has 18 holes of municipal golf (owned by Minneapolis Park Board), Bloomington has 27 holes of municipal golf, Minneapolis has 81 municipal holes (in Minneapolis) and Hopkins, Richfield and Eden_ Prairie have none. Some recent course closings are: Hidden Creek - 18 (Owatonna, 2010), Pine River — 18 (Pine River, 2010), Parkview — 18 (Eagan, 2012), Lakeview Golf of Orona 18 (Mound, 2013), Red Oak Executive — 9 (Mound, 2013), Elm Creek — 18 (Plymouth, 2013), Mississippi National = 36 (Red. Wing, course closed with future undecided). .,y \ l a 'L REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 Rounds Played on City of Edina Golf Courses between 2003 and 2013 Actual Rounds- Braemar Braemar Braemar Fred Braemar 18 9 Executive Richards and FR 2003 41,106 27,943 26,587 28,134 123,770 2004 38,951 25,839 24,638 27,306 116,734 2005 35,915 26,791 1 23,512 27,461 113,679 2006 36,478 29,286 23,001 25,995 114,760 2007 34,972 28,840 22,510 26,499 112,821 2008 34,538 30,212 22,038 25,875 112;663 2009 36,590 32,408 22,856 "25,965 117,819 2010 32,106 28,738 18,578 21,965 101,387 2011 32,464 27,603 16,631 19,073 95,771 2012 29,570 29,948 1 17,617 19,361 96,496 2013 1 23,814 24,404 15,377 15,934 1 79,529 REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Determining course capacity involves many factors and assumptions. The Braemar Executive Course and Regulation Courses and Fred Richards Golf Course have the following course capacities: Braemar Executive and Fred Richards Capacity Baseline 1 Page 4 Course 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Average Exec. 48,218 - 60,067 60,844 69,283 64,750 63,812 60,927 Rounds 15,377 17,627 16,631 18,578 22,856 22,038 22,510 19,373 Utilization 25.6% 29.39/6 27.7% 30.9% 38.0% 36.7% 37.5% 32.2% Richards Rounds 1 15,934 1 191361 1 19,703 1 21,965 1 25,937 1 25,875 26,499 221182 Utilization 1 25.5% 1 32.2% 1 32.8% 1 36.6% 1 43.2% 1 43.1% 44.1% 36.7% The assumptions are based on the following: • 9 Hole Course Assumptions • 200 Day Season • 10 Hours of Tee Times • 8 Minute Tee Time Intervals • 4 Players per Tee Time • Total Capacity of 60,000 Rounds Braemar Regulation Course Capacity Baseline Regulation 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Average Rounds 48,218 59;518 60,067 60,844 69,283 64,750 63,812 60,927 Utilization 36.5% 45.0% 45.5% 46.0% 52.4% 49.0% 48.3% 46.1% The assumptions are based on the following: • 200 Day Season e 10M urs of Tee Times • 8 Minute Tee Time Intervals • 4 Players per Tee Time "Sample Day" • Tee #1- 18 and 9 hole play, 18 hole play cascades to #10 Tee • Tee #10- 9 hole play for first two hours, the 18 hole play from Tee #1 (second 9) • Tee #19- 9 hole play Capacity • Tee #1- 300 +Players • Tee #10- 60 Players • Tee #19 - 300 Players • Total Capacity of 132,000 Rounds REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 5 Presentation of Findings The objectives of the golf operations recommendation are as follows: • Provide financial stability and self - sufficiency • Increase customer service levels • Improve facilities for better play and experience A six step strategy was presented to achieve our objectives: 1. Narrow the Scope of Golf Enterprise 2. Invest in improvements at Braemar 3. Modify prices and discounts 4. Outsource ancillary services 5. Expand marketing 6. Improve customer service 1. Narrow the Scope of Golf Enterprise In order to concentrate our energy, attention and investment on the city's primary golf product, staff recommends the city narrow the scope of our golf enterprise by closing the Fred Richards Golf Course. The recommendation to close Fred Richards Executive Course is not an easy one. The course is popular with kids and seniors and is a cherished destination for the neighborhood residents who have either played there or taught their kids to -play there. It is well maintained and with tee sheets only 33% full, it's easy to play on short notice. The course has a nice layout for beginners, kids and seniors with flat topography and two flagsticks at each green so that players can choose the easier or more difficult pin placement. Access to the course is difficult. It is not easy to find Parklawn Avenue between 76 h and 77`' Streets. There is no direct street access or visibility and customers must enter through a parking lot driveway easement from the adjacent property to get to our parking lot and clubhouse. Even with specific directions, it is difficult to find. The property is bordered by the Pentagon Park.o{fice complex and Barr Engineering on the south, and homes and Lake Edina Park on the north. Prior to the Fred Richards Golf Course development, there was a privately owned course ( Normandale) on part of the property and Normandale Park occupied the other 1/3 to %2 of the property. Some of the park amenities were three ball fields, tennis courts and a playground prior to the development of FREC: In 2008 and 2009 approximately 26,000 rounds of golf were played at FREC and that number declined to around 19,000 in 2011 and 2012. In 2013 15,934 of rounds were played at Fred Richards. During the same four year period between 2008 and 2012, Fred Richards declined 25% while the Braemar Executive Course declined 20 %. Staff believes that customers and operations would both benefit from having all golf operations at the Braemar location. With the dome, driving range, clubhouse and 36 holes of golf at Braemar, it is expensive and inefficient to have staff and resources spread out over two facilities between Braemar and FREC. To best 'meet the needs of all golfing demographics, it would be beneficial for our customers to have a variety of amenities at one location. With just a cursory look at our budget, it is difficult to fully ascertain a full picture of revenues and expenses for each of the REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 6 business units. Because of the nature of the management of our golf operations and original budget designations, several items are not being charged to the budget as a FREC expense. For example, between 2009 and 2012, Golf Fund budgets show Fred Richards making an average profit of $47,500. However, the following charges are not being coded to the Fred Richards operation and should be considered: i $30,000 in equipment from Braemar's CIP fund is dedicated to Fred Richards annually. • $20,000 of commodities from Braemar's budget is consumed at FREC (fertilizer, chemicals, etc.). • Approximately $30,000 of maintenance labor from Braemar's budget goes to time spent at Fred Richards annually. • Approximately $20,000 in Administrative /Management support from Braemar is utilized at FREC annually (tech support, time cards, invoice payment,- hiring and training, management and HR support). After completing a- detailed pro forma of anticipated revenues and expenses, it is estimated that $734,000 could`be saved by 2020. A detailed description of this savings is below and is also included on Page 15 of the Pro Forma (Attachment D). 2015 — 2020; Cumulative Savings: Closing.Fred Richards $(878,200) Revenue loss from FREC, Net of Braemar additions $1,432,200 Operating expense cash savings $180,000 Equipment savings $734,000 Total Cumulative Cash Savings 2. Invest In Improvements At Braemar For many years golfers and staff at Braemar have been concerned about the quality of the driving range at Braemar. The driving range is too short for today's club technology. With current clubs, it is possible for golfers hitting from the range to hit into the teaching area on the north end of the range and also into hole 2 on the Executive Course, posing a safety concern for all golfers on the north end of the'range. Also, because the lack of depth in the driving range tee area, much of the turf is gone by late spring. This leaves golfers to hit in patchy dirt conditions or off of the much less desirable artificial turf mats. When golfers arrive at the driving range to hit a bucket of balls either as practice or as warm up to a round of golf and they see the signs stating that golfers must hit off mats, often times they leave the facility or skip warm ups to avoid, hitting off of mats. Conservatively, an improved driving range will increase driving range revenues by $218,000 in 2016 to $240,000 in 2020, providing a 10 year return on investment. A new driving range would provide the best range facility in the metro area, retaining existing.golfers who are eager for the new facility, as well as attracting new golfers to the Braemar courses, clubhouse, dome and pro. shop. REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION Page 7 Part of the driving range expansion would include some modifications and improvements to the Executive Course, converting it to a Par 3 Course. There are currently 5 holes crowded into the space south of Braemar Boulevard. Two new holes would be added on the north side of Braemar Boulevard, one par 4 would be converted to a par 3 and one par 4 would be converted to two par 3s. This would improve the playability and overall experience of the current Executive Course. The entry drive into Braemar would also be improved with more trees and expanded water features. A new driving range with improvements to the Executive Course /Par 3 Course would cost approximately $1.1 to $1.3 million and provide a 10 year return on investment. Staff, also recommends updating the grill and clubhouse. The facility is dark and dated, limiting its marketability to golfers and facility renters. Simple changes in paint, carpeting, window treatments and updated furniture would improve the image. The grill is also in need of a significant updates in order to be appealing to a wider customer base, while also giving us the ability to offer a wider menu and better customer service. The appearance and function of the grill and clubhouse do not match the City of Edina or Braemar Golf Course brands and need significant updating. Staff also recommends hiring a professional golf course architect to provide a master plan of the Braemar golf courses. Because of the debt service created by the addition of the Clunie nine (holes 19 -27) and FREC, significant improvements at Braemar have not been possible. Being one of the oldest courses in the state at 50 years old, the course is in need of many updates. Much of the course is in a flood plain and much of the fairway system is peat based. Over. the years the fairways have begun to settle and sink and tee boxes have compacted. Greens and bunkers need renovation and in some cases removal of bunkers is needed. We have too many bunkers and most are 3 times as large as they should be, by current course design standards. Drainage and cart paths need to be addressed. Braemar also has the oldest and largest irrigation system in the state. It is in need of replacement in the next five years at a cost of approximately $2 million. It is critical that we study, plan and budget appropriately for the renovation of the course amenities. It is imperative that proper planning determines the need and timelines of projects in order to re -do work completed because projects were not sequenced properly. The master plan is also critical to ensure that we're providing state of the art training facilities in addition to courses that will meet the needs of all abilities, ages and demographics. Braemarr must be appealing and welcoming to kids, young adults and seniors in order to remain relevant and vibrant well into the future. It would be ideal to begin this process immediately. With the recommended closing of Fred Richards, it is critical that we aggressively market Braemar and provide appropriate facilities for beginners, youth and seniors. It is critical that as we plan for course improvements that will enhance Braemar to provide the beginner /intermediate level experience that we provide at FREC. This will involve improvements to the Executive Course /Par 3 and improvements to the Clunie 9, as well as improvements to the original 18 hole course. Staff is also working on a variety of programs to continue to attract golfers and non - golfers to Braemar. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 8 Current programs: Adults Group lessons with three levels from beginner to advanced. The lessons run mid -April until mid - August. Tee it Up! Fore Golf which is a rules and etiquette program for students who are ready to be introduced to playing on a golf course. Several, sessions are offered throughout the summer. uniors • Group lessons with levels from beginner to intermediate; ages 8 -17. Offered June and July. • Junior Development - Offered all summer. • Level I is for juniors who have completed levels I and 2 and are ready to be introduced playing on the golf course. It is a 3 day program with instruction on the range as well as on the golf course. • Level -2 is for juniors who play the regulation course and desire to take their game to the next competitive level. It also is a 3 day program with instruction on the range as well as on the golf course. • Junior League is made up of 5 leagues, three on the two executive courses, one regulation 9 hole league and one regulation 18 hole league. The leagues play for 6 weeks beginning right after school.is out in June. New programs for 2014: Family • Movies Under The Stars. Outdoor movies on the driving range. A family friendly movie (UP) in August and a more grown up "golf themed" movie (Tin Cup) in June. Complete details have not been completely finalized, but we will offer refreshments, snacks, and games prior to the movie to encourage dinner and entertainment prior to the movie. • Winter groomed trails: In December 2013, staff began grooming 9' wide winter recreational trails at Braemar. The north loop is 1.7 miles long and the south loop is 1.2 miles long. The trails are being used by walkers, dog walkers and cross country skiers. • Family Twilight Zone. Every Saturday and Sunday, after 6 p.m.'a reduced rate will be offered for up to four players. • Adult/Youth Golf Lesson. Introduce a child to golf with 4 one hour lessons for kids and their parents to learn to golf together. Women • Women's Night Out At The Dome. This is not completely new, but contests and prizes will be added. This will be a night at the dome for women prior to the start of the golf REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 9 season. Vendors will be invited for equipment demonstrations. Golf clinics will be given by all our golf professionals. Unlimited golf balls will be offered and food and beverages will be served. • Teach and Taste. Golf clinic for women with wine tasking social event. • Girls Golf League. Short lessons with playing time on the executive /par 3 course. Mentors from the women's league will walk along and help the kids learn the game, rules and etiquette. Women's Golf Camp. Adults • Nite Glow Golf. Nine holes of golf on the executive course with a glow golf ball with only the tees, flag sticks and holes being illuminated. • Nine and Wine. Two rounds of nine holes and a bottle of red or white wine. • One Hour Golf Clinics. One hour clinics on Saturdays with a different focus each week. • Adult Player Development Series. The program will focus on each aspect of the game in a small class ratio and will include playing time with teaching professionals. Level one will be for the beginning golfer and Level two will be for a more advanced golfer. Other Potential Programs • Senior Golf Tournament and lunch at the Executive Course in September. • Cookie decorating with Mrs. Claus in early December at the clubhouse. 3. Modify Prices and Discounts We plan to modify our fees by increasing fees during periods of highest demand utilizing yield management techniques. Pricing will be set by demand, with the highest charges at the peak demand times. This is a standard practice in the golf industry. Non -peak times will also be studied and programs will be offered to promote course use during those periods. For example, we could offer a Player Development Program. For a set monthly rate, customers would get a discount for green fees and free range time during specific underutilized times. New programs and classes will also be added. These programs will increase awareness of our course, attract new customers, utilize the course or range during non -peak times and provide fun, exciting and /or challenging experiences for new and experienced golfers. Demand is down nationally for golf because it is too hard, too expensive and takes too much time. Women, kids and young adults are under- represented in the golf market. We plan to target them specifically with our amenities, programming and course structure. The existing patron card system will be evaluated. This program has declined significantly over the years and needs to be, re- evaluated. Rewards programs are most effective when rewards are frequent, like after the second or third visit. Increased rewards and customer appreciation programs need to be implemented. We need to attract new REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 10 customers while working hard to retain existing customers. There are a lot of choices for today's golfer. It is critical that we incite golfers to repeatedly choose to golf with us and to bring their friends, family and co- workers with them. Half of the revenues presented in the pro forma are from increases through new fees or fee structures. Different reward programs will be considered 4. Outsource Ancillary Services Staff recommends that we outsource grill operations, similar to what the City of Minneapolis has done successfully in its park system with the Tin Fish at Lake Calhoun, Bread & Pickle at Lake Harriet and Sea Salt at Minnehaha Park. We believe that we can improve our customer service by having better food and beverage offerings while generating more revenue to support Braemar operations. This would also provide an opportunity to remodel the grill and clubhouse areas and potentially offer a full service catering kitchen to better meet the needs of our banquet operations. We want to provide a family friendly environment to entice our customers to stay after a round of golf to socialize, consider attending an event at the clubhouse or bring a client for a round of.golf and a casual lunch or dinner afterward. The Grill at Braemar has been operating on a break even basis. We have one full time year round employee and 27 seasonal employees. Outsourcing the grill would save in staffing, cost of goods sold and utilities. Benefits would be a new and improved menu, enhanced service in the grill and on the course and the opportunity to bring in a restaurant with name recognition, which would help to drive food and beverage sales. S. Expand Marketing The proposed plan increases the marketing allocation by from $67,000 in 2014 to $143,000 in 2020. We plan to build excitement about our golf operations through a robust and professional marketing campaign, both in and outside of Edina. 6. Improve Customer Service Our customers are our number one priority and they need to be treated accordingly. We plan to significantly improve the customer service in all aspects of our golf operations. The golf team will view the golfer experience through a series of "touch points" on the golf course. We will improve customer service at all of these touch points, including making tee times, arriving at the course, checking in, warming up, starting, playing a round, making the turn, finishing the 18th hole and clubhouse to car. This will involve everything from providing the best access to tee times and class registrations and staying on time, to knowing golfers names. Our customers need to know that we value the time and money that they spend at Braemar and we' need to show our appreciation in all customer contact situations. Pace of play will''also' be a priority of Braemar staff. Similar to what the Edina Liquor Stores did in 2013, we plan to hire a customer service training team to help us hire, coach and train and evaluate our full and part time staff. We will also conduct REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page I I secret shopper experiences to accurately evaluate our service. The cost to provide this customer service training for a full season will be 39600. Summary This six step strategy would reduce expenses by $2.3 million by 2020. (Details on Page 15 of Pro Forma, Attachment D). $734,000 will be saved by closing FREC. $1,307,900 will be generated with new rates and marketing ($592,500) will be the net spent/earned on an improved driving range $362,800 will be saved by the reduction of three full time staff and 27 part time staff $522,200 will be generated by outsourcing the grill operations $2,334.400 Total Savings By 2020 The,2013 Quality of Life Survey reported that 76% of Edina residents did not visit Fred Richards Golf Course in the last year. 21 % of residents did not utilize trails, 17% did not use neighborhood parks, 52% athletic fields, 53% Edinborough Park, 36% Centennial Lakes Park, 62% the Aquatic Center, 67% Senior Center, 68% Braemar Arena, and 58% Braemar Golf Course. The biggest financial benefits to the golf fund in this proposal comes from closing Fred Richards Golf Course,, improving the driving range and course conditions and increasing rates at Braemar. Additionally, without the $734,000 estimated savings that will come from closing Fred Richards, it would be extremely difficult to finance the driving range construction. Financing would have to come from not funding other city projects, new debt, or a combination of both. Debt financing comes with additional costs that make the project much less profitable. Also, without the savings from closing Fred Richards, the Golf Fund would not have enough cash flow to pay the debt service in the future. Due to the existing $1 million debt in the Golf Fund and the annual losses experienced in the Golf Fund, the likelihood of receiving bonding for this project is highly unlikely. If a driving range project is to begin in the fall of 2014, it is critical for a decision on the closing of FREC early in 2014. Final design, watershed approval and the bidding process will take several months. Staff believes that the $734,000 estimated savings from closing Fred Richards is conservative. Our historical financial data shows an average profit (prior to debt service) at Fred Richards of around $50,000. However, this excludes at least $50,000 of current expenses in supplies and staffing that aren't being charged to FREC, but are being absorbed by Braemar. It also excludes any future capital improvements, which will be significant. FREC is 20 years old and will start to see significant expenses required to maintain service levels. Some capital projects that aren't currently included in the CIP are: REPORT / RECOMMENDATION New Roof Carpet/Furniture Fiber Optic to Clubhouse Point of Sale System Security Camera Bathroom Remodel Outdoor Furniture Golf Car Replacement Irrigation System Fairway rehabilitation due to soil settlement 2019 2017 2015 2015 2016 2020 2016 2017 2025 2020 $50,000 $20,000 $100,000 $1,500 $7,500 $30,000 $10,000 $16,000 $500,000 $654,000 - $4 million+ Page 12 Residents expressed concern over a decrease in property values if Fred Richards Golf Course is repurposed to a park. The Trust for Public Land conducted a study on the economic value of city park systems and through their sample found that parks can contribute to the value of residential properties immediately adjacent to a park by as much as a 20 percent marginal value. For properties further away from the location of the park, parks still can provide as much as a 5 to 10 percent marginal value. Parks improve the local tax base and increase property values. It is proven that private property values increase the value of privately owned land the closer such land is to parks. This increase in private property value due to the proximity to parks increases property tax revenues and improves local economies. A Texas A &M review of 25 studies investigating whether parks and open space contributed positively to the property values of surrounding properties found that 20 of the 25 studies #ound that property values were higher. The real estate market consistently demonstrates that many people are willing to pay a larger amount for property located close to parks and open space areas than for a home that does not offer this amenity. Staff recommends the creation of a Community Advisory Team to work with the Park Board to prepare a master plan for repurposing Fred Richards Golf Course to Fred Richards Park. This could be completed as a project separate from, but related to the park system strategic plan. The best timing for this project would be at the completion of the 2014 golf season. Customer service training and increased marketing is being incorporated immediately. Outsourcing of the grill would start in 2015. n REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Recommendation Page 13 At the February 11, 2014 Park Board meeting the board received this presentation and held a one hour public hearing. Residents were allowed to speak for two minutes and all people in attendance had an opportunity to speak if they so desired. After questions for staff and discussion the following action was taken: Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, that the Park Board recommendation to the City Council that the golf operations proposals, including the recommended closing of Fred Richards Golf Course, be supported. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. The unapproved minutes of the February 11, 2014 Park Board meeting are attached. Because of the integrated nature of the staffs six point strategy, staff requests the City Council consider the set of recommendations as a package and give the packet one of the three actions: I . Recommend (generally support) 2. Do Not Recommend (do not support) 3. Non- Recommend (do not have enough information to recommend or not recommend) Attachments: A. National Golf Statistics Charts B. Edina Golf Statistics Chart C. January 30, 2014 Golf Meeting Notes D. Golf Pro Forma Scenarios'— City of Edina Golf Operations Study E. Unapproved Park Board Minutes — February 11, 2014 Attachment A National Golf Round Statistics Rounds Volume Rounds (in Millions) 7 Year Change: Soo Sol 498 489 486 47S 463 E "Z-.l 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 % Change (year-over-year) 6.7% 5.7% 2.1% 0.9% o.0olp.3% 1-0.1 0 r -0.6% 0.6% -1.8% _2-30ZZ.5% -3.0% 1999 2000 20012002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112012 Rounds played fell 11%, or 55 million rounds over the last 10 years. In 2012, almost half of the losses were recovered, providing a reason for cautious optimism. ** Statistics by the NGF, the National Golf Foundation National Golf Round Statistics Net Change in National Supply of Courses 18 Hole Equivalents Net Change = Openings Minus Closures (in 18 hole equivalents) Since 2006, there has been a cumulative supply reduction of 500 facilities. ** Statistics by the NGF, the National Golf Foundation National Golf Round Statistics Rounds Played in 2012 +2.0% or higher +1.9% to -1.9% -2.0% or lower Pacific + 1.6 %; Mountain +7 %; west and North Central +7.6% (Including Minnesota) East and North Central +10.8%; New England - +3.2 %; Mid Atlantic - +10.1% South Atlantic + 2.4 %; South Central + 5.0% Extraordinary weather in 2012 drove rounds up by the largest increase since the turn of the century (5.7% nationally). Playable days were up 6.5% according to the PGA of America (data from PGA Performance Trak). These results are from a Rounds Played Research Coalition led by Golf Datatech and supported by the PGA of America, the NGF and the NGCOA. Findings are based on rounds played reporting from over 4, 000 golf facilities, most of which are contributing their data through the PGA's Performance Trak reporting system.) ` Statistics by the NGF, the National Golf Foundation 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 Attachmen B Edina Golf Statistics Golf Rounds at Edina Courses ti� ti� ti� ti� ti� ti� ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo do ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo ,yo do ,�o ,yo ,yo ®1992 Projections - Total Rounds ®Actual Rounds - Braemar and FR 1 Attachment C City of Edina Golf Meeting Notes January 30, 2014 Scott Neal opened the meeting at 7:10pm. A request was made for common etiquette to be observed at the meeting to allow for as much input as possible. It was noted that this meeting was in the beginning stages of golf operations discussions with the community. The next two opportunities for input on golf operations are Tuesday, February 111h (Park Board Public Hearing, 7pm) and Tuesday, March 4`h (City Council Meeting, 7pm). A PowerPoint was shown to the audience (see attached) and commentary given by Scott Neal and Ann Kattreh. It was noted that the reason for these discussions regarding golf operations in Edina originated with the request by City Council to look into ways to maintain financial stability in golf operations. A reminder was given to attendees that all input is welcome and toy please contact staff and council members via the mail @edinamn.eov email address. A Question- Answer Period ensued. 1. Tom Wexler, Edina Resident Noted: Mr. Weiler is happy with customer service at Braemar and sees no need for improvements. Questions: What will happen to the Fred Richards Golf Course if it is closed? How much is the closing worth and what will Edina do with the money? Answer (Scott): Fred Richards was purchased in 1982 for $800,000. The plan is not to sell Fred Richards, but rather to repurpose the area for Edina residents. What to do with the area is an open process and staff wants to have input from the community before repurposing plans are suggested. 2. Nancy Thorvelson, Oaklawn Avenue Questions: What are the projected costs for the consultants you are utilizing in this process? Answer (Ann): We do not have an exact total number yet as the plan has not been approved and we are still seeking input. One consultant has been used to date (at $5,000) to estimate the driving range plan costs. A customer service consultant is estimated at $5,000 - $10,000 and final figures for the driving range consultant would be less than $25,000. 3. (No Name Given) Question: How did Edina pay for the Fred Richards Golf Course in the first place? Answer (Scott): The money came from the Golf Fund. 4. (No Name Given) Noted: Concerned that Fred Richards is really a course for kids and youth to learn how to play golf. Question: What will happen to the Youth Golf Program at Fred Richards if the course closes? Answer (Ann): The City will work with programming and outreach to draw Youth to Braemar programs for kids, especially the Executive Course. 5. Dan Sleck, 4708 Kellogue Noted: The City should look at the profit /loss of all golf operations together, not individually. Questions: Has staff looked at any successful Par 3 courses in the Twin Cities? Why, has the city decided to evaluate finances of individual golf courses as stand -alone instead of collectively? What has the City done to look into the potential loss in property values of residential sites near Fred Richards? Answer (Scott): We will need to look into these items for the next meeting. i y 6. Scott Dorn, Cornelia Neighborhood Noted: Residents appreciate the Fred Richards course as one for beginner golfers. It is an intangible asset to the community. We should consider raising greens fees to save the course. Questions: Is this an issue about Braemar? Where is the decrease in rounds per year most significant? Noted: Asked for a show of hands in support of the "Save the Fred" effort. (No Name Given), West Shore Drive Noted: The City needs to have a Master Plan for the Fred Richards course in order to get people on board with the plan. Question: Where is the plan for Fred Richards? Answer (Scott): We do not have a Master Plan because we wanted the repurposing question to be left open to the community for input. We are recommending this plan, not saying what should be done. The park planning process must involve the community. 8. Rob Koop Question: How much would it cost to repurpose the Fred Richards? Has any thought been given to close the Clunie 9 -hole course at Braemar? Answer (Scott): The Clunie 9 -hole course will be considered in the long -term plan. We do not have an estimate for the repurposing of Fred Richards as the City wants community input first. 9. Bonnie McGrath Noted: Edina is unique in that it has a variety of golf courses to suit all types of golfers. We are trying to fix something that doesn't need fixing. Customer service is great. We should look at marketing the courses more to bring in more revenue. The community has not been able to weigh in on the plan and would like to recommend that the public be brought into committee discussions. 10. John Stang, lives at 7a' green of Fred Richards Noted: Crestfallen to hear of closing of Fred Richards. Understanding of financial considerations, but supports Bonnie's comments that the suggestion to close Fred Richards without input is unacceptable. 11. Jim Scattergood Noted: Recognizes the declining of golf revenues, but wants to look at other areas that may generate revenues. Stated a complaint regarding the hiring of consultants. Suggests the City approach residents to serve as consultants to save money. 12. Bill Dobbs Noted: Wonders if the City has drawn a comparison between the Chaska Towncourse and Braemar. He would be in support of upgrades for Braemar Golf Course. 13. Dan Olson, Seagate Technology Noted: His company has a golf league that plays every Tuesdays at Fred Richards. Wondered if the Pentagon Park refurbishment is linked to the marketing of Fred Richards to new businesses. He is supportive of the use of Liquor revenue to support golf operations. Question: Why do the golf courses need to be profitable? Answer (Scott): Currently 80% of golf operations costs are covered. The City Council decides on what percentage merits looking into support options. 14. Philip Smith Noted: The decline in golf rounds per year has to do with the weather. Question: What about the golf dome finances? Answer (Scott): The trajectory of the line graph was caused by additional factors to the weather: Not having the golf dome open last year was - difficult on a short term basis, but fortunately we were able to pay for 2.6 million of the 3.5 million cost with insurance payments. 15. Tom Terwilliger Question: How did you come up with the $750,000 savings if Fred Richards is closed? Answer (Scott): (needs clarification - The City would not agree that this is a cash -flow positive.... too much chatter throughout room to hear complete response). 16. Nancy Thorvelson Noted: There is hostility towards the City Staff because of past experiences with the Pentagon Park question and Cornelia Park issues. The public has a track record with the City and it is not positive. Why does Fred Richards need to make money? Equated Fred Richards to warming houses, ice rinks and other parks. Golf should be an amenity of the City. Recommends a city -wide vote on the issue. 17. Burt Holling, Cornelia neighborhood Noted: The support of the community present surrounding the issue. A reminder to the City that there are people who are missing in the room who need to hear the community, namely, the City Council. 252 people signed the "Save the Fred" petition. Also asked attendees to see the Facebook page and website for Fred Richards. Response (Scott): Encouraged dialogue with the City and Council. Reminded the audience that the Council would like to hear from the public on this matter. 18. Gage Halvi Noted: He supports Fred Richards and Braemar. He moved to Edina so that he could get a t -time at Braemar. Would like the City to define the problem. Question: Why close Fred Richards? What problem is the City trying to solve? Answer (Scott): The City Council has asked staff to look at the long -term sustainability of golf operations in the city. This will be a community choice with community input. 19. Paul Rosenthal, Rep. Question: Is the Fred Richards paid for in full? Answer (Scott): Yes,.as of January 2013. Statement by Rep. Rosenthal: If the Fred Richards is paid for in full, where will the revenue come from if not from Fred Richards? One month is not enough time for feedback on the golf plan. The entire community must be involved in the process and he requested more time for the effort. 20. Andrea Keller Noted: With regards to the decline in golf rounds, Ms. Keller started a little girls' league that has grown in the past five years from a membership of 30 to 130. She is concerned about the rush to close Fred Richards. and would like to see more focus on ways to grow the game of golf in the community. 21. Hugh Thompson Question: Would like to know what the t -time utilization figures are for Braemar and Fred Richards. Answer (Scott): We will need to get those figures for you. 22. Wayne_ Noted: He moved to Edina for two reasons: the schools and the amenities, not money. He believes that the sport of golf will rebound as hockey did and that this plan is presumptuous. 23. Art Lowell, Kellogue Avenue Noted: If the City'closes Fred Richards the property will go back to the Park Board. Question: What will the Park Board do to repurpose the property and what will the cost be to maintain the park facility? Answer (Scott): Difficult to estimate costs without knowing the land use. The land use is open to discussion from the public and no decisions have been made. 24. Leslie Sharp Noted: Has played for 35 years at Braemar, but not at Fred Richards. He likened Fred Richards to a church camp. Even though Fred Richards operates at a loss, it brings new blood into the game (youth) which is crucial for the game's future. Asked the City to please reconsider the'park as an asset to the community. Suggested raising greens fees to earn more revenue to keep the Fred Richards open. 25. Greg Shuster, Minneapolis resident Noted: He is a Fred Richards fan and plays often at Braemar. Question: What is the reasoning behind the closing of Fred, Richards? Answer (Scott): The City put together a package which focuses on earning more revenue from golf operations. 26. San Asato, Edina resident Noted: Thanked the City for hosting the meeting. He likes to golf in Edina and looks forward to making improvements from Braemar as it looks like that is what is best for the city. He does not, however, understand the financial assumptions behind the proposed plan. Question: Will you have the pro -forma information available as part of the prep packet for the Park Board meeting? Answer (Scott): Yes, we will have it available. 27. Pat Shannon, 76`h Street Noted: He was disappointed that only one proposal has been given as a plan. Question: Is the City open to additional proposals and the creation of a volunteer committee to Save Fred Richards? Answer (Scott): Yes, other proposals are welcome to be presented at the Park Board meeting. The City's default mode is to find a way not to close facilities so new ideas are always welcome. 28. Al Grinbrid Noted: He does not want the closing of Fred Richards and he suggests that attendees approach their Council Members about the issue. Question: Is the Fred Richards closing a developer question (based on the two plans developed for the Pentagon Park redevelopment)? Answer (Scott): The Pentagon Park redevelopment firm, Hillcrest Development, has created two overall plans; one with Fred Richards and one without. The firm is not driving the golf operations project. 29. Bill Richards, Cahill Road Noted: He finds the conversation about the changes to the Executive Course at Braemar very disappointing. He would like to preserve one or two Par 4 courses at Braemar. 30. Michelle Lamson, Edina Realtor & Property Manager Noted: She wanted to note that Fred Richards adds to the property values in the area and keeps the crime rate down for the area. Feels it is very important element of the South East corner of Edina. 31. Jim Jenkins Noted: He would like clarification on the allocation method that is causing Fred Richards to lose money. Would like to know how much is being allocated and what the loss is. 32. Tom Wexler Noted: The City is making a mistake about the anticipated Grill revenues. The emphasis on customer service is being misplaced. 33. Tim Nasby, West Shore Drive Noted: This meeting is long overdue and as a life -long resident, has been very disappointed about the process. Recommends that a vote is taken before the plan is enacted. Response (Scott): Provided clarification that the City Staff does not make the decisions about enactment of the plan and that the Park Board will take public testimony on February 11`". 34. Tom Terwilliger Noted: He suggested that the rounds of golf appear to decline in 2008 during the recession. Questions: What if the rounds increase to former levels over the next five years, especially if we go ahead and make these improvements? Is the City open to additional proposals? Answer (Scott): The rounds of golf peaked in 1998 and have had a steady decline ever since. The City is definitely open to additional proposals. 35. (No Name Given) Question: Is the Braemar Golf Course subsidizing the Braemar Arena? Answer (Scott): No, the Liquor fund supports the Braemar arena. Question: Will the City look into various management companies to outsource Grill operations? Answer (Scott): Yes. 36. (No Name Given) Noted: He would like the City to tap into the community for solutions to this issue; open the books for broader discussion. 37. Rosemary Gellen, Arden Park Noted: Thanks to Scott Neal and his online Blog containing financial figures. She noted that the Braemar Arena receives funds in the amount of $600,000 from the Liquor fund. She also wondered why the City is only looking at one component of the budget rather than the whole. Scott Neal thanked the community for attending the meeting and closed the meeting at 9:07pm. CITY OF EDINA �900-W O H \v • Golf Operations Study Financial Projections Page 1 Rounds of golf over the years Page 2 Baseline projections Page 3 Baseline without Fred Richards (1 FTE staff reduction) Page 4 City Staff Plan Financial Variables Close Fred Richards (1 FTE reduction), Page 5 Rate increases, Page 6 Improved marketing, Page 7 Driving range expansion Page 8 Grill outsourcing (1. FTE reduction), & Page 9 Staff reduction (1 FTE in addition to 2 others, total of 3) Page 10 Braemar rates vs. competition Page 11 ROI calculations for driving range and grill changes Page 12 Possible future improvements after successful execution of the plan Page 14 Fred Richards financial history Page 15 Six -point strategy cumulative and annual savings Alternatives for faster physical improvements to Braemar Transfer more cash to golf from other City funds in 2014 or 2015 Sell City assets and deposit some of the proceeds to golf fund Spend Braemar Memorial fund Issue bonds to be paid back with tax dollars Issue bonds to be paid back with future golf revenue (risk of additional City subsidies in the future if golf demand continues to decline) Attachment D NOTE: All plans and variables assume average weather and consistent demand for golf each year of the study. o o o- 0 0 0 0 0 1994 I 1995 N 1996 N 1997 `�° 1998 O 1999 h 0 2000 O °-' 2001 2002 Q Q N . '^ 2003, 2004 T I 2005 CL :. D 2006 �• 2007 (7 2008 °- 2009 H p0 2010 H 3 2011 of 2012 C „ 2013' 2014 2015 2016 Page 2 City of Edina Golf Fund Baseline Scenario January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (260,566) (26,766) (2,001,466) (1,627,166) (1,293,366) (1,064,666) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (260,566) $ (26,766) $ (2,001,466) $ (1,627,166) $ (1,293,366) $ (1,064,666) $ (881,366) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 92% 89% 87% 86% 84% 83% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 GC -12 -007 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 95,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Operating revenues 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW �q Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,296,250 3,352,200 3,409,100 3,467,200 3,526,200 3,586,600 3,648,100 Operating expenses •Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,989) $(1,084,247) $(453,491) $(1,003,440) $(260,566) $(26,766) $(2,001,466) $(1,627,166) $(1,293,366) $(1,064,666) COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,565,168 3,657,600 3,827,600 4,008,300 4,123,700 4,245,000 4,372,200 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (268,918) (305,400) (418,500) (541,100) (597,500) (658,400) (724,100) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change in net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 492,282 147,300 36,200 (84,500) (138,900) (197,700) (261,300) January 1 not assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,592,032 5,739,332 5,775,532 5,691,032 5,552,132 5,354,432 December 31 netasse $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,592,032 $ 5,739,332 $ 5,775,532 $ 5,691,032 $ 5,552,132 $ 5,354,432 $ 5,093,132 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 492,282 $ 147,300 $ 36,200 $ (84,500) $ (138,900) $ (197,700) $ (261,300) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (425,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 610,392 Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 742,874 233,800 (1,974,700) 374,300 333,800 228,700 183,300 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (260,566) (26,766) (2,001,466) (1,627,166) (1,293,366) (1,064,666) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (260,566) $ (26,766) $ (2,001,466) $ (1,627,166) $ (1,293,366) $ (1,064,666) $ (881,366) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 92% 89% 87% 86% 84% 83% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 75,000 Golf Fund - Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 26,300 Baseline Scenario Braemar: slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 53,800 Braemar. clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 110% Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 145,000 158,900 162,800 172,300 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 51,300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW �q 384,700 Golf dome construction NA 3,000,000 600,000 dO dO ` Golf cart replacement NEW M 172,300 Total dO $ $ 3,245,000 $ 917,800 $ 425,500 $ 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/26/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund Baseline Scenario $1,500,000 Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 110% $1,000,000 105% $500,000 100% $ i• �q 95 %c M dO dO ` M dO v $(500,000) /,♦ /'/ ; 90% ♦ / $(1,000,000) / ♦ •����� O� �♦ 83% 85% do 4• ,I l $(1,500,000) 00 80% de do dP $(2,000,000) Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 75% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 .Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 92% 89% 87% 86% 84% 83% •Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,989) $(1,084,247) $(453,491) $(1,003,440) $(260,566) $(26,766) $(2,001,466) $(1,627,166) $(1,293,366) $(1,064,666) $(881,366) 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/26/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Page 3 City of Edina Golf Fund Baseline Scenario Without Fred Richards 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,367 96,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 84,600 86,700 86,800 87,900 89,000 89,000 Operating revenues Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Close FR, net of adds to Braemar (4,900) (4,650) (4,350) (4,050) (31750) (3,800) Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Close FR, net of adds to Braemar (14,000) (13,200) (12,400) (11,600) (10;800) (11,000) Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Close FR, net of adds to Braemar (9,800) (9,200) (8,600) (8,000) (7,400) (7,500) Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Close FR, net of adds to Braemar (140,000) (132,100) (124,100) (116,000) (107,700) (109,300) Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,296,250 3,183,500 3,249,950 3,317,750 3,386,550 3,456,950 3,516,500 Operating expenses COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Close FR, net of adds to Braemar (7,000) (6,700) (6,400) (6,100) (5,800) (5,900) Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Close FR (153,000 (157,600) (162,300) (167,200) (172,200) (177,400) Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Close FR (18,000) (18,000) (18,000) (18,000) (18,000) (18,500) Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Close FR 50,000 ( ) (51,000) (52,000) (53,100) (54,200) (55,800) Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 494,000 570,000 654,000 670,000 689,000 711,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,565,168 3,361,600 3,523,300 3,695,600 3,802,300 3,914,800 4,031,600 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (268,918) (178,100) (273,350) (377,850) (415,750) (457,850) (515,100) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - (11600,000) - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 (838,800) 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change in net assets. 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 (1,107,718) 274,600 181,350 78,750 42,850 2,850 (52,300) January I not assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341;032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 3,992,032 4,266,632 4,447,982 4,526,732 4,569,582 4,572,432 December 31 net asse $ 2,354,850 $ : 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 3,992,032 $ 4,266,632 $ 4,447,982 $ 4,526,732 $ 4,569,582 $ 4,572,432 $ 4,520,132 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ (1,107,718) $ 274,600 $ 181,350 $ 78,750 $ 42,850 $ 2,850 $ (52,300) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 494,000 570,000 654,000 670,000 689,000 711,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (395,500) (2,556,900) (174,200) (179,300) (242,600) (249,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 2,190,392 Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 722,874 323,100 (1,870,550) 493,550 468,550 379,250 339,300 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (280,566) 42,534 (1,828,016) (1,334,466) (865,916) (486,666) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (280,566) $ 42,534 $ (1,828,016) $ (1,334,466) $ (865,916) $ (486,666) $ (147,366) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 95% 92% 90% 89% 88% 87% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.60% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 75,000 - Braemar. carpeting GC -12 -006 $1,500,000 26,300 Baseline Scenario Without Fred Richards Braemar. slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 53,800 Braemar, clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 145,000 158,900 132,800 142,300 146,600 151,000 155,600 160,200 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 51;300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 F-1 F-1 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW 384,700 Golf dome construction NA 3,000,000 600,000 Golf cart replacement NEW 172,300 Total $ - $ 3,245,000 $ 917,800 $ 395,500 $ 2,556,900 $ 174,200 $ 179,300 $ 242,600 $ 249,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund'pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is'from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected founds drop to 84,600 in 2015, gradually increasing to 89,000 in 2018 as FR golfers migrate to Braemar 1/2812014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund $1,500,000 Baseline Scenario Without Fred Richards 110% Assumed.2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 $1,000,000 105% $500,000 100% F-1 F-1 it, M 95%0) s�� • u d �+ $(500,000) 90%a //� / `% e. W / % / , �, 87% $(1,000,000) , 85% $(1,500,000) �. 40 80% � O $(2,000,000) Actual 75% Actual Actual Actual Protected Protected Projected Protected Protected Protected Projected Protected 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 F Expense recovery 1 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 95% 1 92% 90% 89% 88% 87% Cash balance 1 $(987,051) $(1,106,989) $(1,084,247) $(453,491) - $(1,003,440) $(280,566) $42,534 1 $(1,828,016) $(1,334,466) $(865,916) $(486,666) $(147,366) 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund'pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is'from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected founds drop to 84,600 in 2015, gradually increasing to 89,000 in 2018 as FR golfers migrate to Braemar 1/2812014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Page 4 City of Edina Golf Fund City Staff Plan 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101;387 95,771 96,496 80,000 96,000 76,000 83,000 84,000 85;000 86,000 86,000 Operating revenues Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Close FR (4,900) (4,650) (4,350) (4,050) (3,750) (3,800) Outsource grill (137,400) (140,050) (142,750) (145,450) (148,250) (150,700) Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Close FR (14,000) (13,200) (12,400) (11,600) (10,800) (11,000) Outsource grill (205,300) (209,400) (213,600) (217,800) (222,100) (225,400) Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Rate increase 76,000 67,500 58,800 49,800 40,600 31,100 21,300 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300, 90,660 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Outsource grill 75,000 76,100 77,200 78,400 79,600 80,800 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Close FR (9,800) (9,200) (8,600) (8,000) (7,400) (7,500) Rate increase 25,000 42,700 64,500 59,200 78,900 73,500 68,000 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Close FR (140,000) (132,100) (124,100) (116,000) (107,700) (109,300) Rate Increase 69,500 153,500 129,100 182,400 157,300 241,800 215,900 Driving range expansion (34,200) (142,500) (28,500 •(28,900) ... (29,300) (29,700) (30,100) Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Driving range expansion (41,100) (151,100) 218,300 227,000 231,500 236,200 240,900 Rate increase - 3,000 3,000 43,000 43,000 88,000 88,000 133,000 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,394,450 2,888,900 3,461,800 3,571,100 3,668,700 3,807,100 3,870,200 Operating expenses COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 3.47,752 320,000 366,540 375,760 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Close FR . (7,000) (6,700 (6,400) (6,100) (5,800) (5,900) Outsource grill (150,000) (153,800) (157,600) (161,500) (165,500) (169,600) Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 .. 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Close FR (1 FTE). (153,000) (157,600) (162,300) (167,200) (172,200) (177,400) Add PT staff for rate incre_ase/programming change at dome 10,500 10,800 11,100 11,400 11,700 12,100 12,500 Driving range expansion (15,000) (65,000) 20,000 20,600 21,200 21,800 22,500 Outsource grill (1 FTE) (170,000) (175,100) (180,400) (185,800) (191,400) (197,100) Reduce 1 FTE, net of PT adds (50,000) (51,500) (53,000) (54,600) (56,200) (57,900) (59,600) Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Close FR (18,000) (18,000) (18,000) (18,000). (18,000) (18,500) Increase marketing 120,000 123,600 127,300 131,100 135,000 139,100 143,300 Outsource grill (15,000) (15,500) (16,000) (16,500) (17,000) (17,500) Commodities 323,311. 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000. 356,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Close FR Outsource grill (50,000) (51,000) (52,000) (53,100) (54,200) (55,1300) (12,000) (12,400) (12,800) (13,200) (13,600) (14,000) . Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134;496 140,000 .128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 4244077 412,683 395,953 471,000 576,000 542,000 631,000 715,000 731,000 750,000 772,000 Total expenses 3,542,048: ' 3;543;558 3,383;110 " 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,648,668 3,080,500 3,332,900 3,498,300 3,598,000 3,703,400 3,813,100 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) x(254,218) (191,600, 72,800 70,700 103,700 57,100 Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,1 i2). (18;015) (12,375)_ (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - (1,600,000) - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 (838,800) 452,700- 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 _ 462,800 Change In net assets 341,759 (13;818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 (1,093,018) 261,100 583,600 529,400 529,300 564,400 519,900 January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 4006,732 4,267,832 4,851,432 5,380,832 5,910,132 6,474,532 December 31 net ass(.$ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $- 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850' $ 5,099,750 $ 4.006,732 $ 4,267,832 $ 4,851,432. $ 5,380,832 $ 5,910,132 $ 6,474,532 $ 6,994,432 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $.(1,093,018) $ 261,100 $ 583,600 $ 529,400 $ 529,300 $ 564,400 $ 519,900 Depreciation 414,656 424;077 412,683 395,953 471,000 576,006 542,000 631,000 715,000 731,000 750,000 772,000 Capitalexpenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (1,609,700) (908,500) (2,556,900) (174,200),: (179,300) (242,600) (249,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) , 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals x31,683 (76,897). (15,125) .(1,902,553) 1,306,893 2,150,392 Change in cash 99,918 _(119;938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 23,674 1 (155,400) (1,407,300) 1,005,200 1,016,000 1,001,800 972,500 January.11 cash: (1,086;969) (987;051) (1,106,989). (1,084,247) .'(453,491) (1,003,440) (979,766) (1,135,166) (2,542;466) (1,537,266) (521,266) 480,534 December 31 cashc $ (987,051) ^$ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) "$ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (979,766) $ (1,135,166) $ (2,542,466) $ (1,537,266):'$ (521,266) $ 480,534 $ 1,453,034 Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 93% 94% 104% 102% 102% 103% 101% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 dreamer. slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 Breemar: clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW Golf dome construction NA Golf cart replacement NEW Total 75,000 691,900 513,000 26,300 82,000 84,100 25,000 25,600 781800 145,000 158,900 132,800 51,300 73,500 3,000,000 600,000 53,600 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 142,300 146,600 151,000 155,600 160,200 107,700 1,615,300 384,700 172,300 $ $ 3,245,000 $ 1,609,700 $ 908,500- $ 2,556,900 $ 174,200 $ 179;300 $ 242,600 $ 249,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014. _ After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 1year Projected rounds drop to 70,000 in 2015 due to FR closing & range construction, gradually increasing to 86,000 in 2020 as FR golfers migrate to Braemar 1/28/2014,G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30.14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund $1,500,000 City Staff Plan llo% / Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4;744,329 If $1,000,000 / 105% $500,000. / / 101% 100% F7 F-1 I/ 95% c e � u d $(500,000) -.,\ - -- - - '- - - - ....90% a `\ $(1,000,000) � �' / ftb / 85% $(1,500,000) 80% , $(2,000,000 ) 3 /Projected Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 75% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Expense recovery 103% 97% -97% -.98% 86% 93% _ 94% 104% 102% 102% 103% 101% •Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,989) $(1,084,247) $(453,491) $(1,003,440). S(979,766) $(1,135,166) ,- $(2,542,466) 1 $(1,537,266) $(521,266) $480,534 $1,453,034 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014. _ After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 1year Projected rounds drop to 70,000 in 2015 due to FR closing & range construction, gradually increasing to 86,000 in 2020 as FR golfers migrate to Braemar 1/28/2014,G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30.14 public meeting.xlsx Page 5 City of Edina Golf Fund Rate Increase Variable Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed Inflation 2.60% Driving range expansion 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 GC -12 -007 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 96,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Operating revenues 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC- 13-004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 282,000 New dome rates 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 56,000 Dome format changes i 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 340,000 Rate increases 25,000 47,800 74,800 74,800 99,800 99,800 99,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 1,601,000 New weekend rate 69,500 69,500 69,500 69,500 69,500 69,500 69,500 Rate increase $(1,000,000) \ \/ r // / 108,000 108,000 186,000 186,000 296,000 296,000 Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Rate increase - - 3,000 3,000 43,000 43,000 88,000 88,000 133,000 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,469,750 3,618,900 3,704,500 3,801,600 3,891,000 4,021,000 4,086,300 Operating expenses Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Increase PT dome staff for new programming 98% 86% 97% 10,500 10,800 11,100 11,400 11,700 12,100 12,500 Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,575,668 3,668,400 3,838,700 4,019,700 4,135,400 4,257,100 4,384,700 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (105,918) (49,500) (134,200) (218,100) (244,400) (236,100) (298,400) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change in net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 655,282 403,200 320,500 238,500 214,200 224,600 164,400 January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,755,032 6,158,232 6,478,732 6,717,232 6,931,432 7,156,032 December 31 not asse $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,755,032 $ 6,158,232 $ 6,478,732 $ 6,717,232 $ 6,931,432 $ 7,156,032 $ 7,320,432 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 655,282 $ 403,200 $ 320,500 $ 238,500 $ 214,200 $ 224,600 $ 164,400 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (425,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 610,392 Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 905,874 489,700 (1,690,400) 697,300 686,900 651,000 609,000 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (97,566) 392,134 (1,298,266) (600,966) 85,934 736,934 December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (97,566) $ 392,134 $ (1,298,266) $ (600,966) $ 85,934 $ 736,934 $ 1,345,934 Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 97% 99% 97% 95% 94% 94% 93% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed Inflation 2.60% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 75,000 - Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 26,300 Braemar: slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 Rate Increase Variable 53,800 Braemar: clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 145,000 158,900 162,800 172,300 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 51,300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC- 13-004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW 384,700 Golf dome construction NA 3,000,000 600,000 I Golf cart replacement NEW 172,300 Total / / $ - $ 3,245,000 $ 917,800 $ 425,500 $ 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor foxed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year 1/28/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund Rate Increase Variable Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 81,500,000 110% I $1,000,000 / / 105% $500,000 / / 100% i 95% d 93% v $(500,000) /\ / 90% C \ / \ / / / �I / \ $(1,000,000) \ \/ r // / 85% an as 4ft so / 1 ! II $(1,500,000) 80% $(2,000,000) Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 75% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 L _ Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 97% 99% 97% 95% 94% 94% 93% Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,98 $(1,084,24 $(453,491) $(1,003,44 1 $(97,566) $392,134 $(1,298,26 $(600,966) 1 $85,934 $736,934 1 $1,345,934 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor foxed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year 1/28/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Page 6 City of Edina Golf Fund Increase Marketing Variable December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (380,566) $ (270,366) $ (2,372,366) $ (2,129,166) $ (1,930,366) $ (1,840,766) $ (1,800,766) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 95,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Operating revenues 53,800 Braemar. clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000. 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,296,250 3,352,200 3,409,100 3,467,200 3,526,200 3,586,600 3,648,100 Operating expenses COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Increase marketing 120,000 123,600 127,300 131,100 135,000 139,100 143,300 Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,685,168 3,781,200 3,954;900 4,139,400 4,258,700 4,384,100 4,515,500 Operating.loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (388,918) (429,000) (545,800) (672,200) (732,500) (797,500) (867,400) Nonoperating' revenues, (expenses), and transfers Projected Projected Actual 2009 2010 Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 .485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change in net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 372,282 23,700 (91,100) (215,600) (273,900) (336,800) (404,600) January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,472,032 5,495,732 5,404,632 5,189,032 4,915,132 4,578,332 December 31 net assc $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,472,032 $ 5,495,732 $ 5,404,632 $ 5,189,032 $ 4,915,132 $ 4,578,332 $ 4,173,732 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 372,282 $ 23,700 $ (91,100) $ (215,600) $ (273,900) $ (336,800) $ (404,600) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (425,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000 (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 610,392 Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 622,874 110,200 (2,102,000) 243,200 198,800 89,600 40,000 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (380,566) (270,366) (2,372,366) (2,129,166) (1,930,366) (1,840,766) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (380,566) $ (270,366) $ (2,372,366) $ (2,129,166) $ (1,930,366) $ (1,840,766) $ (1,800,766) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 89% 89% 86% 84% 83% 82% 81% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 75,000 - $1,500,000 Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 26,300 110% $1,000,000 Braemar:.slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 53,800 Braemar. clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 .Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 145,000 158,900 162,800 172,300 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 51,300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW 384,700 Golf dome construction NA 3,000,000.- 600,000 Golf cart replacement NEW 95 %> o m To 172,300 Total $ $ 3,245,000 $ . 917,800 $ 425,500 $. 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 1,039,329 -Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 1year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/28/2014 G: \Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 3014 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund Marketing, Variable $1,500,000 Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 110% $1,000,000 105% $500,000 100% Z c 95 %> o m To � a OP U $(500,000) 90 % � Q 40 // W $(1,000,000) ft ` / 85% 81% '. $(1,500,000) ; 80% $(2,000,000) 75% Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Actual 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 o Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 89% 89% 86% 84% 83% 82% 81% ®® Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,98 $(1,084,24 $(453,491) $(1,003,44 $(380,566) $(270,366) $(2,372,36 $(2,129,16 $(1,930,36 $(1,840,76 $(1,800,76 1,039,329 -Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 1year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/28/2014 G: \Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 3014 public meeting.xlsx Page 7 City of Edina Golf Fund Driving Range Expansion Variable Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) (9,326) (507,800) (1,804,900) 551,800 514,800 413,400 371,600 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (1,012,766) (1,520,566). (3,325,466) (2,773,666) (2,258,866) (1,845,466) December 31 cash $ (987;051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $_(1,012,766] $ (1,520,566) $ (3,325,466) $ (2,773,666) $ (2,258,866) $ (1,845,466) $ (1,473,866) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 90 "/0 84% 92% 90% 89% 88% 87% Capital Improvement Projects: i Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2016 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 GC -12 -007 Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 95,771 96,496 80,000 96,400 85,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 Operating revenues 51,300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC- 13-004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW Liquor sales, $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 236,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000. 65,000 65,060 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200. 308;200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1;674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Executive closed for construction (34,200) (142,500) / Lower demand for par 3 vs. executive 87% (28,500) (28,900) (29,300) (29,700) (30,100) Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Range closed for construction (41,100) (178,100) Facility fee 27,000 32,000 37,000 37,700 38,500 39,300 Price increase 49,300 50,300 51,300 52,300 53,300 Capacity increase 137,000 139,700 142,500 145,400 148,300 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,220,950 3,058,600 3,598,900 3,665,300 3,728,400 3,793,100 3,858,900 Operating expenses COGS 338,248 326,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Adjust PT staff $(2,000,000) (15,000) (65,000) 20,000 20,600 21,200 21,800 22,500 Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200. 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 576,000 610,000 702,000 789,600 808,000 830,000 855,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,568,168 3,640,600 3,908,600 4,089,900 4,205,900 4,327,800 4,455,700 Operating.loss. 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (347,218) (582,000) (309,700) (424,600) (477,500) (534,700) (596,800) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change in net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 413,982 (129,300) 145,000 32,000 (18,900) (74,000) (134,000) January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,513,732 5,384,432 5,529,432 5,561,432 .5,542,532 5,468,532 December 31 netasse $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,513,732 $ 5,384,432 $ 5,529,432 $ 5,561,432 $ 5,542,532 $ 5,468,532 $ 5,334,532 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 413,982, $ (129,300) $ 145,000 $ 32,000 $ (18,900) $ (74,000) $ (134,000) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 576,000 610,000 702,000 789,000 808,000 830,000 855,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (1,609,700) _ (938,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 610,392 Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) (9,326) (507,800) (1,804,900) 551,800 514,800 413,400 371,600 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) (1,012,766) (1,520,566). (3,325,466) (2,773,666) (2,258,866) (1,845,466) December 31 cash $ (987;051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $_(1,012,766] $ (1,520,566) $ (3,325,466) $ (2,773,666) $ (2,258,866) $ (1,845,466) $ (1,473,866) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 90 "/0 84% 92% 90% 89% 88% 87% Capital Improvement Projects: i Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 75,000 691,900 513,000 Golf Fund Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 26,300 Braemar: slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 Driving Range Expansion Variable 53,800 Braemar: clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 82,000 84,100 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 145,000 158,900 162,800 172,360 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 Tee renovation GC- 13-003 51,300 73,500 107,700 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC- 13-004 1,615,300 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW 384,700 Golf dome construction NA 3,000,000 600,000 Golf cart replacement NEW 172,300 Total $ $ 3,245,000 $ 1,609,700 $ 938,500 $ 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 1year Driving range expansion in 2014 does not include $300;000 transfer from,Braemar Memorial Fund 1/28/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund Driving Range Expansion Variable Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 $1,500,000 110% $1,000,000 105% $500,000 100% F7 $ ! I r 95% c � c u m a � � �+ $(500,000) I ♦♦ 90% C / ♦ 87% $(1;000,000) $(1,500,000) ♦ ' 80% WP $(2,000,000) 75% Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 'Actual 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 czz=.Expense,recovery 103% 1 97% 97% 98% 86 %. 90% 84% 92% 90% 89% 88% 87% e Cash balance -$(987,051) 1 $(1,106,98 $(1,084,24• $(453,491) $(1,003,44 $(1,012,76 $(1,520,56 $(3,325,46, $(2,773,66` $(2,258,86 $(1,845,46 $(1,473,86 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 1year Driving range expansion in 2014 does not include $300;000 transfer from,Braemar Memorial Fund 1/28/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Page 8 City of Edina Golf Fund Outsource Grill Variable Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .2016 2017 2018 2019 .2020 GC -13 -003 Actual Actual Actual Actual: Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 95,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Operating revenues $1,000,000 105% Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Outsource grill (137,400) (140,050) (142,750) (145,450) (148,250) (150,700) Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Outsource grill (205,300) (209,400) (213,600) (217,800) (222,100) (225,400) Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89;300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Outsource grill $(1,000,000) o `o 75,000 76,100 77,200 78,400 79,600 80,800 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Otherfees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331;250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,296,250 3,084,500 3,135,750 .- 3,188,050 3,241,350 3,295,850 3,352,800 Operating expenses Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Outsource grill 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 (150,000) (153,800) (157,600) (161,500) (165,500) (169,600) Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Outsource grill $(453;491) $(1,003,44 $(260,566) $32,534 $(1,858;71 $(1,396,76 (170,000) (175,100) (180,400) (185,800) (191,400) (197,100) Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 .656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Outsource grill (15,000) (15,500) (16,000) (16,500) (17,000) (17,500) Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600• Outsource grill (12,000) (12,400) (12,800) (13,200) (13,600) (14,000) Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,565,168 3,310,600 3,470,800 3,641,500 3,746,700 3,857,500 3,974,000 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (268,918) (226,100) (335,050) (453,450) (505,350) (561,650) (621,200) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400) (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700 462,800 Change In net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 492,282 226,600 119,650 3,150 (46,750) (100,950) (158,400) January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,592,032 5,818,632 5,938,282 5,941,432 5,894,682 5,793,732 December 31 not asse $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,592,032 $ 51818,632 $ 5,938,282 $ 5,941,432 $ 5,894,682 $ 5,793,732 $ 5,635,332 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 492,282 $ 226,600 $ 119,650 $ 3,150 $ (46,750) $ (100,950) $ (158,400) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (425,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal (net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) (1,902,553) 1,306,893 610,392 (20,000) Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 742,874 293,100 (1,891,250) 461,950 425,950 325,450 286,200 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247) (453,491) (1,003,440) ' (260,566) 32,534 (1,858,716) (1,396,766) (970,816) (645,366) December 31 cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (260,566) $ 32,534 $ (1,858,716) $ (1,396,766) $ (970,816) $ (645,366) $ (359,166) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 93% 90% 88% 87% 85% 84% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 Braemar. carpeting GC -12 -006 Braemar. slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 Braemar. clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW Golf dome construction NA Golf cart replacement NEW Total 75,000 82,000 25,000 25,600 145,000 158,900 51,300 3,000,000 600,000 26,300 53,800 84,100 Golf Fund 78,800 80,800 162,800 172,300 73,500 107,700 1,615,300 384,700 172,300 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 $ $ 3,245,000 $ 917,800 $ 425,500 $ 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund,pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000/year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/28/2014 6:\3udget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Golf Fund Outsource Grill Variable $1,500,000 Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 110% $1,000,000 105% $500,000 100% n i F1 m $- I 95 %0 u $(500,000) op 90% x ' ® UJ $(1,000,000) o `o Of 84% 85% T / � $(1,500,000) ; 80% $(2,000,000) Actual Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected 75% 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 92% 93% 90% 88% 87% 85% 84% - Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,98 $(1,084,24 $(453;491) $(1,003,44 $(260,566) $32,534 $(1,858;71 $(1,396,76 $(970,816) $(645,366) $(359,166) 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund,pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000/year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year Driving range expansion not included in baseline scenario 1/28/2014 6:\3udget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 30 14 public meeting.xlsx Page 9 GC -12 -005 Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 Braemar: slit drainage 3 fairways City of Edina Golf Fund Braemar: clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 Irrigation replace phase 2 FT Staff Reduction Variable Golf dome construction NA Golf cart replacement NEW 158,900 162,800 172,300 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 3,000,000 Actual Actual Actual I Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Total rounds sold 118,076 101,387 95,771 96,496 80,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Operating revenues ; - - _ :. ' I _ 85a � Liquor sales $ 146,632 $ 144,541 $ 145,492 $ 161,040 $ 151,000 $ 156,000 $ 158,300 $ 160,700 $ 163,100 $ 165,500 $ 168,000 $ 170,500 Retail sales 212,886 218,585 230,865 230,120 190,000 215,000 221,500 228,100 234,900 241,900 249,200 256,700 Concessions 230,776 213,250 203,598 223,775 185,000 218,000 221,300 224,600 228,000 231,400 234,900 238,400 Memberships 123,761 119,981 108,978 88,555 62,400.. 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 Admissions 264,671 228,126 313,735 70,049 45,000 282,000 290,500 299,200 308,200 317,400 326,900 336,700 Building rental 81,728 70,726 87,081 74,215 70,000 88,000 89,300 90,600 92,000 93,400 94,800 96,200 Equipment rental 359,277 362,763 335,161 359,484 301,500 340,000 345,100 350,300 355,600 360,900 366,300 371,800 Green fees 1,880,610 1,738,261 1,517,962 1,661,982 1,487,000 1,601,000 1,625,000 1,649,400 1,674,100 1,699,200 1,724,700 1,750,600 Other fees 358,333 346,971 338,353 356,371 284,000 331,250 336,200 341,200 346,300 351,500 356,800 362,200 Total revenues 3,658,674 3,443,204 3,281,225 3,225,591 2,775,900 3,296,250 3,352,200 3,409,100 3,467,200 3,526,200 3,586,600 3,648,100 Operating expenses COGS 338,248 328,821 320,132 347,752 320,000 366,540 375,700 385,100 394,700 404,600 414,700 425,100 Personal services 1,774,558 1,636,091 1,564,676 1,574,394 1,500,000 1,545,000 1,591,400 1,639,100 1,688,300 1,738,900 1,791,100 1,844,800 Reduce by 1 FT position, net of PT adds (50,000). (51,500) (53,000) (54,600) (56,200) (57,900) (59,600) Contractual services 580,479 557,828 628,347 489,372 475,000 619,000 637,600 656,700 676,400 696,700 717,600 739,100 Commodities 323,311 479,783 329,006 344,549 320,000 348,000 358,400 369,200 380,300 391,700 403,500 415,600 Central services 110,796 116,958 128,266 134,496 140,000 128,628 132,500 136,500 140,600 144,800 149,100 153,600 Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Total expenses 3,542,048 3,543,558 3,383,110 3,286,516 3,226,000 3,515,168 3,606,100 3,774,600 3,953,700 4,067,500 4,187,100 4,312,600 Operating loss 116,626 (100,354) (101,885) (60,925) (450,100) (2.18,918) (253,900) (365,500) (486,500) (541,300) (600,500) (664,500) Nonoperating revenues, (expenses), and transfers Interest expense (35,182) (18,015) (12,375) (6,676) (12,000) (33,800) (32,300) (30,300) (28,400 (26,400) (24,300) (22,200) Miscellaneous 90,315 5,222 9,052 2,623,627 - - - - - - - - Transfers 170,000 99,329 100,000 100,000 570,000 795,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 485,000 Total nonoperating 225,133 86,536 96,677 2,716,951 558,000 761,200 452,700 454,700 456,600 458,600 460,700. 462,800 Change[ n net assets 341,759 (13,818) (5,208) 2,656,026 107,900 542,282 198,800 89,200 (29,900) (82,700) (139,800) (201,700) January 1 net assets 2,013,091 2,354,850 2,341,032 2,335,824 4,991,850 5,099,750 5,642,032 5,840,832 5,930,032 5,900,132 5,817,432 5,677,632 December 31 net asse $ 2,354,850 $ 2,341,032 $ 2,335,824 $ 4,991,850 $ 5,099,750 $ 5,642,032 $ 5,840,832 $ 5,930,032 $ 5,900,132 $ 5,817,432 $ 5,677,632 $ 5,475,932 Non -GAAP cash reconciliation Change in net assets $ 341,759 $ (13,818) $ (5,208) $ 2,656,026 $ 107,900 $ 542,282 $ 198,800 $ 89,200 $ (29,900) $ (82,700) $ (139,800) $ (201,700) Depreciation 414,656 424,077 412,683 395,953 471,000 558,000 562,000 641,000 728,000 747,000 769,000 794,000 Capital expenditures (173,180) (173,300) (89,608) (233,670) (3,245,000) (917,800) (425,500) (2,586,900) (204,200) (209,300) (272,600) (279,400) Debt principal.(net) (515,000) (280,000) (280,000) (285,000) 809,258 - (50,000) (65,000) (65,000) (65,000) (70,000) (70,000) Other accruals 31,683 (76,897) (15,125) _(1,902,553) 1,306,893 590,392 - - - Change in cash 99,918 (119,938) 22,742 630,756 (549,949) 772,874 285,300 (1,921,700) 428,900 390,000 286,600 242,900 January 1 cash (1,086,969) (987,051) (1,106,989) (1,084,247). (453,491) (1,003,440) (230,566) 54,734 (1,866,966) (1,438,066) (1,048,066) (761,466) December 31. cash $ (987,051) $ (1,106,989) $ (1,084,247) $ (453,491) $ (1,003,440) $ (230,566) $ 54,734 $ (1,866,966) $ (1,438,066) $ (1,048,066) $ (761,466) $ (518,566) Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 94% 93% 90% 88% 87% 86% 85% Capital Improvement Projects: Assumed inflation 2.50% Driving range expansion GC -12 -005 Braemar: carpeting GC -12 -006 Braemar: slit drainage 3 fairways GC -12 -007 Braemar: clubhouse roof replacement GC -12 -008 Cart path repair /expansion GC -12 -009 Maintenance equipment GC -13 -001 Tee renovation GC -13 -003 Irrigation replace phase 1 GC -13 -004 Irrigation replace phase 2 NEW Golf dome construction NA Golf cart replacement NEW Total 75,000 - 26,300 53,800 82,000 84,100 25,000 25,600 78,800 80,800 145,000 158,900 162,800 172,300 51,300 73,500 107,700 1,615,300 384,700 3,000,000 600,000 ' 27,600 28,300 87,000 89,200 176,600 181,000 185,600 190,200 172,300 $ - $ 3,245,000 $ 917,800 $ 425,500 -.$ 2,586,900 $ 204,200 $ 209,300 $ 272,600 $ 279,400 Golf Fund 1 FT Staff Reduction Variable $1,500,000 Assumed 2009 -2020 Total Subsidy of $4,744,329 $1,000,000 $500,000 C r $(500,000) ' i do r ` o `�® do $(1,000,000) '- '- _ +� - - ; - - _ :. ' I _ 85a � $(1,500,000) op Y.�I� $(2,000,000) Actual Actual Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Actual 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 0 Expense recovery 103% 97% 97% 98% 86% 94% 93% 90% 88% 87% 86% 85% e -Cash balance $(987,051) $(1,106,98 $(1,084;24 $(453,491) $(1,003,44 $(230,566) $54,734 $(1,866,96 $(1,438,06 $(1,048,06 $(761,466) $(518,566) 1,039,329 Estimated 2009 -2013 subsidy 3,705,000 Future subsidy assumed 2014 -2020 Construction fund pays capital costs currently in CIP through 2014 After 2014 the only subsidy is from liquor fixed at $485,000 /year Projected rounds fixed at 100,000 /year 110% 105% 100% r 95% a u w m c 90% o X W 85% 80% 75% 1/28/2014 G:\Budget\2014 -2015 Budget \Golf study \Golf pro forma scenarios v6 for Jan 3014 public meeting.xlsx Braemar Pricing Comparison $120.00 E3 18 holes weekday, walking $100.00 i] 18 holes weekend, walking 018 holes weekend + cart $80.00 i $60.00 i $40.00 x $20.00 $0.00 Meadowbrook Hiawatha Brookview Baker (Medina) Dahlgreen Bluff Creek Braemar Bunker Hills Deer Run Stonebrooke Chaska Town The Wilds (St. Louis Park) (Minneapolis) (Golden Valley) (Carver Co) (Chaska) (Coon Rapids) (Victoria) (Shakopee) (Chaska) (Prior Lake) Driving range cost recovery calculation $ 1,279,900 range & executive construction cost $ 395,900 revenue loss during construction $ 1,675,800 total cost to build $ 169;800 annual revenue increase less expense increase 9.9 years to cost recovery 10.1% return on investment Outsource grill cost recovery calculation $ - construction cost $ - revenue loss during construction $ - total cost to build $ 79,300 annual. revenue increase less expense increase years to cost recovery #DIV /0! return on investment CIP (and Memorial Fund) Wish List The below list reflects some new and expanded ideas to our CIP that was originally generated. The list is broader and more involved and encompasses all aspects of our operation to enhance the entire experience for our customers. -Golf Course ideas: Here are a few options that would help bring energy back into the golf course. These are based on the survey monkey responses asking for a better experience. Unfortunately, I do think these options all should be formally designed by an architect so the feel of the course is uniform. I also believe there will be significant watershed permit issues related to these projects. Irrigation system replacement = $2,000,000 (2017) Driving range expansion = $1,500,000 (2015) Cart Paths Maximum Plan - Invest $600,000 in wall to wall cart paths on 1 -27. Most of these paths would be asphalt, some would be gravel. Minimum Plan - Invest $100,000 in a focused mix of gravel and asphalt paths that eliminate most of the problem areas on the course. Drainage There are at least 11 areas on fairways that need drainage or to be regraded. An estimate of about $25,000 per site totals $275,000. Bunkers There are 68 bunkers at Braemar Golf Course. The most difficult 9 bunkers we have are on the executive golf course. I think these 9 bunkers increase our operating costs and reduce the experience of the golfers that play the executive course. Any opportunity to remove these bunkers during the driving range expansion should be considered. Maximum Plan - It costs approximately $6,000 to rebuild a bunker. The remaining 59 bunkers on 1 -27 would cost about $350,000 to rebuild. Minimum Plan - Evaluate these 59 bunkers and determine which ones are should be removed. Also, pick the "top 10" that should be rebuilt. Project cost is $60,000. Tees The most dated area of the golf course is the tee box area. The tee signs, benches, trash cans and plantings are dated and difficult to maintain. Some of the tees are not level and are also difficult to maintain. The original design had 4 sets of tee markers (Blue, White, Red and Yellow). A significant portion of our league golfers have requested a course that plays shorter than the original design, which is a current trend in golf. With this feedback we have implemented 2 additional sets of tee markers (Silver and Green). The silver tees are used mostly by senior men and are located with the white tees on some holes and with the red tees on other holes. The green tees are used mostly by women and are located with the red tees on some holes and with the yellow tees on other holes. In addition to leveling, the tee areas could be redesigned with a broader market of men, women, and beginners in mind. Maximum Plan - Rebuild and relocate the tees to better suit all of our customers. Create a new tee marker plan. Replace the signs, furniture and update any necessary plantings. Some of the cart paths would have to be replaced in this process. Estimated cost is $550,000. Minimum Plan - Replace the signs, furniture and plantings for $150,000. Building ideas: The scope of many these projects are smaller and may be a good fit for our memorial fund monies. We feel the memorial fund is an option because these projects will be less likely.to bring in significant revenues but will enhance the customers overall experience and opinion of our facilities. Grill facelift = $125,000 (2016) Roofing = $160,000 (2014 & 2015 — expecting insurance money from storm damage) Banquet 'room tables and chairs = $20,000 (2015) Carpeting throughout (2015) Pro Shop counter Moving the pro shop counter to the west end of the pro shop will require customers to walk through our shop and merchandise and will give our staff better site lines of the tee boxes. This project should be done in conjunction with new carpeting. Banquet Room The numbers will be pending a meeting with an interior decorator and can potentially be done in one project or likely cafeteria format where projects can be picked based on priority and budget. • Lighting in banquet room • Lighting in east corridor • Artwork and furniture • Rest room updates • Hallway modifications (removing half doors and phone booth) • Removing hallway wall paper and painting (should be done with above line project) Roof shape /design This can be carried out in our roofing budget. The idea would, be to standardize the roof lines and remove the antiquated look. Consideration would be given to using standard shingles (which are cheaper than cedar shakes) and applying the potential savings to roof shape design /modifications. Technology upgrades Consider removing the stand alone projects currently in the CIP (AV upgrades and security cameras) to a larger scoped project that would incorporate those two projects along with an internal message board and two new outdoor sign boards—one at the entry and one `marquee' board announcing events. We would need to work with CTS (IT) to determine budget and potential of this project. Deck resurfacing and new deck furniture This project will depend on how we move forward with the grill. It would likely be a minimum of $50,000. Landscape lighting Replace the lighting outside the clubhouse along the entry and around oak tree. Repurpose locker rooms and upgrade lounges These are very long term projects that would likely involve larger dollars. Fred Richards Golf Course Detail Revenue and Expenses 2007 through 2013 Administrative Expenses (BU 5430) Cost of Sales 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 preliminary Fred Richards Revenue $43,343 $43,631 $46,194 $46,488 $44,134 $51,147 $36,440 Vending/ Miscellaneous $185 $102 $75 $95 $244 $222 $42 Concesson Sales $18,163 $24,387 $23,158 $23,218 $23,209 $19,799 $15,437 Rent Golf Carts $9,177 $11,456 $13,150 $10,002 $8,993 $14,039- $11,744 Car, Cart, & Club Rentals $3,864 $4,517 $4,261 $3,419 $4,029 $4,933 $4,084 Green Fees $226,624 $220,325 $217,749 $203,595 $175,542 $188,550 $170,628 Total Reveries $258,013 $260,787 $258,393 $240,329 $212,017 $227,543 $201,935 Administrative Expenses (BU 5430) Cost of Sales $8,337 - $12,289 $11,775 $12,291 $8,845 $10,240 $8,064 Personal Services $43,343 $43,631 $46,194 $46,488 $44,134 $51,147 $36,440 Contractual Services $14,722 $14,727 $13;430 $13,139 $12,788 $15,208 $14,124 Commodities $1,341 $2,421 $2,833 $1,575 $3,599 $2,102 $5,476 5430 Administrative Expenses $67,743 $73,068 $74,232 $73,493 $69,366 $78,697 $64,104 Maintenance Expenses (BU 5431) Personal Services $92,141 $94,167 $92,340 - $83,652 $92,572 $93,995 $87,325 Contractual Services $1,450 $6,262 $5,366 $2,670 $5,466 $2,972 $3,695 Commodities $19,984 $20,846 $15,301 $20,647 $20,085 $17,248 $18,736 5431 Maintenance Expenses $113,575 $121,275 $113,007 $106,969 $118,123 $114,215 $109,756 5430 &5431 expenditures $181,318 $194,343 $187,239 $180,462 $187,489 $192,912 $173,860 Fred Richards Golf Course Summary of Operations 2007 through 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Total Revenue $258,013 $260,787 $258,393 $240,329 $212,017 $227,543 $201,935 Expenses in BU 5430 &5431 - $181,318 - $194,343 - $187,239 - $180,462 - $187,489 - $192,912 - $173,860 FR expenses recorded to Braemar (estimate) - $50,000 - $50,000 - $50,000 - $50,000 - $50,000 - $50,000 - $50,000 FR debt principal & interest - $256,380 - $248,288 - $249,497 - $244,457 - $236,750 - $232,250 - $252,500 CIP /im prove ment projects Cash increase (decrease) - $229,685 - $231,844 - $228,343 - $234,590 - $262,222 - $247,619 - $274,425 CITY OF 'EDINA STAFF SIX -POINT GOLF STRATEGY Cumulative and annual savings summary Cumulative savings: present day through 2020 Average annual savings Strategy 2015 -2020 cumulative savings: close Fred Richards 1 $ (878,200) Revenue loss from _Fred Richards, net of Braemar adds 1,432,200 Operating expense cash savings 180,000 Equipment savings $ 734,000 Cumulative cash savings Strategy 2014 -2020 cumulative savings: adjust rates 2 $ 1,680,900 Rate increases 546,400 New rate categories $ 2,227,300 Cumulative cash savings Strategy 2014 -2020 cumulative savings: improve marketing 3 $ (919,400) Cumulative cash savings Strategy 2014 -2020 cumulative savings: improve range 4 $ (1,204,900) Construction cost (395,900) Lost revenue during construction 1,008,300 Revenue increase after construction $ (592,500) Cumulative cash savings Strategy 2014 -2020 cumulative savings: outsource grill 5 $ 522,200 Cumulative cash savings Strategy 2014 -2020 cumulative savings: reduce staff 6 $ 362,800 Cumulative cash savings Six -point plan $ 734,000 Close Fred Richards Total savings 2,227,300 Adjust rates (919,400) Improve marketing (592,500) Improve driving range 522,200 Outsource grill 362,800 Reduce staff $ 2,334,400 Six -point plan cumulative savings Average annual savings: close Fred Richards $ (146,400) Revenue loss from Fred.:Richards, net of Braemar adds 238,700 Operating,expense cash savings 30,000 Equipment savings' $ 122,300 Average annual cash savings Average annual savings: adjust rates $ 240;100 Rate increases 78,100 New rate categories $ 318,200 Average annual cash savings Average annual savings: improve marketing $ (131,300) Average annual cash savings Average annual savings: - improve range $ (172,100) Construction cost (56,600) Lost revenue during construction 144,000 Revenue increase after construction $ (84,700) Average annual cash savings Average annual.savings: outsource grill $ - 74,600 Average annual cash savings Average annual savings: reduce staff $ = 51,800 Average annual cash savings $ 122,300 Close Fred Richards 318,200 Adjust rates (131,300) Improve marketing: (84,700) Improve driving range 74,600 Outsource grill 51,800 Reduce staff $ 350,900 Six -point plan average annual savings ' Att,Ac`hment E UNAPPROVED - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PARK BOARD HELD AT CITY HALL February 11, 2014 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER Chair Steel called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. It. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Student Members present: Good, Johnson. Also present: City Manager Scott Neal. Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to amend the rules of the public hearing to limit speakers' testimony to two minutes per speaker in order to allow more residents to speak. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. Member Gieseke made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to approve the meeting agenda. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Segreto, to approve the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Park Board Meeting of January 14, 2014 Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Celia, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS V.A. Golf Course Operations Study Mr. Neal noted this presentation regarding the city's golf enterprise was first given to about 300 members of the public at Braemar Golf Course on January 30, 2014. He presented data showing a significant decrease in rounds of golf sold since 1998, which has increased costs to the taxpayers. He looked at the past subsidies of the golf fund as well as the proposed $485,000 subsidy going forward. He noted the city's three objectives going forward are financial stability and self - sufficiency, increased customer service levels, and improved facilities for better play and experience. He noted a significant issue is how to pay for improvements at the golf courses. Mr. Neal presented a six -step strategy, beginning with narrowing the scope of golf operations, specifically closing Fred Richards as a golf course at the conclusion of the 2014 season. Ms. Kattreh noted the second step is to make improvements at Braemar, including improvements at the driving range, the teaching range, the drive into the golf course, and the Grill and clubhouse. She discussed the importance of creating a master plan for Braemar, in order to accommodate youth, women, seniors, and players of all abilities. Mr. Neal indicated the third step is to modify prices and provide discounts. Ms. Kattreh noted that part of the plan is to outsource ancillary services, specifically the Grill. A better product and more inviting environment are possible. Mr. Neal noted another step is to expand marketing at Braemar. Ms. Kattreh stated the sixth step is to improve customer service at Braemar. The plan is to hire a customer service consultant to help train, hire, evaluate, and coach. Mr. Neal then presented pro - formas for golf rounds in the future and discussed the repurposing of the Fred Richards site, which would remain as a public area with low- intensity use going forward. Member Deeds stated it is important to have conservative projections for golf rounds sold, for example, if only 90,000 rounds are sold rather than the 100,000 projected rounds. Ms. Kattreh responded the improved customer service and marketing levels should make 100,000 rounds sold feasible. Member Segreto asked about the opinion of the Braemar Golf Course manager. Todd Anderson, Braemar Golf Course Manager, concurred the golf industry is difficult right now, and he is in agreement with the six -part plan. Member Jones asked about the staging of the repairs and improvements. Mr. Neal explained that the staging of the improvements is also impacted by the possibility of obtaining credit to make the improvements. However, the credit rating agencies always have significant questions about the operations of the two golf courses and the revenue losses. Regarding staging, the new driving range should be commenced at the tail end of the golf season. Member Jones asked about preservation of the wildlife and green space at the Fred Richards course and the possibility of land being sold to a developer.. Mr. Neal responded the Council has not given any indication that they are interested in selling park property. Fred Richards was acquired in 1992 for $800,000; staff has no recommendation for anything other than future park use. Ms. Kattreh concurred, noting that process for determining how to use the site would involve a citizen advisory committee as well as the Park Board. Member Jones asked about putting certain holes at Braemar on hold. Ms. Kattreh noted that as part of the master plan, every hole will be considered. Chair Steel opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. Gene Nord, 6425 Nordic Circle, Vice President of the Braemar Men's Club, read aloud the letter from Rick Ites, the President of the Braemar Men's Club and the Braemar Golf Association. He noted many improvements are needed at the Golf Course. Leslie Sharp, 6501 Cherokee Trail, expressed support for plan and for the improvements of Braemar Golf Course, particularly for cart paths. 2 rI Andrea Keller, 4010 Monterey Ave., a PGA teaching professional, spoke against the proposal for closing Fred Richards. She stated it is an ideal course for juniors, and specifically young girls, to learn the game. Derek Johnson, 7421 West Shore Drive, noted the Fred Richards course was profitable was 2013. He stated the course at Braemar is not as suitable for beginning golfers. This plan closes a revenue - generating facility and converts it to a non - revenue - generating piece of land. Scott Nelson, 6428 Vernon Ave., stated Fred Richards is a great place, but it is time to let go of the course. He noted Braemar was one of the top courses in the state, and it should be returned to that status. Katie Bourget, 6203 South Knoll, asked for more time for research to develop programs at Fred Richards, as it is a great course to develop beginners, specifically young girls. Richard Johnston, 4505 Wooddale Ave, stated Fred Richards offers a unique golf experience, and it should be retained for future generations. He also agreed with the improvements at Braemar. He suggested working on making Fred Richards more profitable. Marie Leggett, 6 Spur Road, stated she has been playing on Fred Richards for the past three years. Anita Leggett, 6 Spur Road, encouraged the Park Board to encourage other options to raise resources rather than closing Fred Richards. She read aloud an email from PGA in support of golf and noted there may be untapped.potential with coming of the 2016 Ryder Cup. John Marshall, 6404 Stauder Circle, spoke against the current proposal to close Fred Richards. He is concerned about a lack of plan to keep the game of golf growing. Tim Nasby, 7408 West Shore Drive, commented on the two.consultant reports completed on golf operations. He noted the NGF report stated that while Fred Richards Golf Course may not be consistently profitable for the City of Edina, it's a place as a feeder facility to develop new players and will benefit all other golf courses in the system. Dan DeYoung, Scottsdale, Arizona, stated the golf industry will continue to decline. Making Fred . Richards into a park does not make the city money. He played a lot of golf at Fred Richards as a young player. Scott Dorgan, 4504 Gilford Drive, stated Fred Richards is cash -flow positive and should remain in operation for kids and grandparents learning the game. He urged Park Board members to spend an afternoon at Fred Richards this summer. The kids should be placed in highest value in this decision. Lorenzo Tunesi, 4413 Ellsworth Drive, expressed support for the six -step proposal presented. Anna Heirigs, 4529 Gilford Drive, stated she has learned to play golf at Fred Richards over the last two years. Barton Hallin, 4424 Gilford Drive, stated his children have learned to play golf at Fred Richards, and it is a great place to have three generations golfing all at once. He also questioned the timing of creating a citizen advisory team after, rather than before, Fred Richards is closed. 3 Tom Terwilliger, 7421 Kellogg Ave, referred to the 2011 NGF consultant report that cited Fred Richards as an invaluable feeder facility for the Edina golf system. Dan Goodenough, 5604 Valley Lane, cited the city should be investing several million dollars in both golf courses to bring them up to par. RJ Smiley, 6205 St. Johns,Ave., observed Edina cannot support 45 holes, of golf. There. is_a tremendous demand for an executive golf course in Edina. He recommended closing Fred Richards and immediately begin a master redevelopment plan for Braemar that would include 18 holes of quality golf and also create an executive 9 -hole course. Dan Olson, Minneapolis, indicated the league he participates in a Tuesday league at Fred Richards with all levels of golf ability, which would not be possible at Braemar. Robert Peterson, 5620 Doron Drive, spoke in support of the major reinvestment at Braemar. In 1984, it was the number one golf course in-the State of Minnesota, but the golf course has been allowed to decline. Ms. McGrath, 4619 Moorland Ave., stated she plays in the girls' league on Sundays at Fred Richards, and it is important to keep the course open. Megan Keller, 4010 Monterey Ave., asked that Fred Richards be kept open. Andrea Keller, 4010 Monterey Ave., asked for the Park Board to explore the many other opportunities for funding. She noted Braemar will never be a small, unintimidating course. If the city closes Fred Richards, many golfers will be lost. Wayne VanderVort, 4525 Gilford Drive, stated he plays golf with many of his grandchildren at Fred Richards. He requested that the Park Board create a citizen committee to look at the financials with staff. He has spoken to three golf groups from Fred Richards who indicate they will not transfer to Braemar. He also noted the PGA is on a crusade of creating courses with only 9 holes. Dan DeYoung, Scottsdale, AZ, suggested the Park Board explore other options to see what keeps the course busy during the week and on the weekend. Elizabeth and Katie Dickey, 5.021 Yvonne Terrace, indicated both have played Fred Richards with their father, and they expressed support for keeping it open. Tom Gastler, 4417 Gilford Drive, expressed support for Fred Richards. He does not believe public engagement has sufficiently been sought in this process. Paul Rosenthal, 4721 Hibiscus Ave., expressed support for Fred Richards, calling it a jewel of the community. He expressed concern about the condensed timeline not allowing for sufficient public input. John Velgersdyk, 4516 Sedum Lane, stated he is encouraged by the improvements at Braemar. He opposes the closing of Fred Richards and believes the 2011 and 2013 studies show the course is profitable. 4 Ella Marshall, 6404 Stauder Circle, and Emily Bourget, 6203 South Knoll Drive, indicated they both love playing with family and friends on the Fred Richards course. Kevin Holm, 4501 Belvidere Lane, expressed support for the improvements to Braemar as well as closing Fred Richards. Barton Hailing, 4424 Gilford Drive, expressed support for Fred Richards. He mentioned the development on Pentagon Park near Fred Richards, and the developer has said it could work with either a golf course or something else. He noted more people are using executive courses, so there seems to be a new set of players for Fred Richards, right next to the course. He suggested tabling the decision on Fred Richards at the end of 2014, whereupon two or three proposals should be put forward, one of which should be retaining Fred Richards. George Griffiths, 4444 Dunham Drive, stated the Braemar 9 -hole course is the most consistently used course of the four courses in Edina. Additionally; there are nine distinct cost centers in.the Braemar Golf operations (Braemar 18, Braemar 9, Braemar Executive, Fred Richards, Golf Dome, Driving Range, Pro Shop, Club House and other social functions) that could be established in the golf enterprise in order to embark on a study to find out exactly what is making money and what is losing money. Derek Johnson, 7421 West Shore Drive, thanked the Park Board for the chance to speak tonight and asked that the Park Board take additional time to consider options other than closing Fred Richards. Chair Steel closed the public hearing ended at 8:44 p.m. Member Deeds asked Mr. Neal to discuss the financials to clear up the questions raised by the public. Mr. Neal asked Mr. Roggeman to speak, as he prepared the pro - formas. Eric Roggeman, Assistant. Director of Finance, stated there are two business units that account for business activities at Fred Richards, one for maintenance and the other for activities. At first glance, it looks like a, positive cash flow of $50,000. What is not accounted for is about $250,000 in debt and historic interest payments. Also not included are several items that run through the Braemar cost center, such as a load'of fertilizer or maintenance equipment, which would be another $50,000. He believes the cash flow has historically been negative by at least $250,000. The question is whether Fred Richards can cash flow going forward, especially as improvements are needed in the future. Member Deeds asked about the bond rating agencies' concerns regarding golf operations. Mr. Neal responded the City of Edina has a AAA rating. One of the underpinnings of the credit rating is management. One of the measures of that management is how many municipal operations run in an enterprise setting. When the analysts see that there is deterioration in a major enterprise like the golf course, they become concerned about it and ask about future planning. The city's answers to those questions could potentially impact the city's bond rating. The city would like to have a solid plan in place for those creditors. Member Deeds noted one option to fund improvements is the use of revenue bonds. He asked about the possibility of using revenue bonds for Braemar improvements. Mr. Neal responded a major borrowing has not occurred in the golf operation. Staff would like to point at the golf operation revenue and use that as leverage for future.debt. General obligation bonds will probably have to be issued to do improvements. If the city can pay it with golf revenues, great. Otherwise, it becomes a tax burden. V Member Segreto noted there are significant capital improvements coming up if Fred Richards remains open. The city cannot maintain both courses. Chair Steel asked about accommodating youth at Braemar with the improvements. Ms. Kattreh stated staff does not underestimate the value of Fred Richards to youth golfers in Edina. The master plan at Braemar would invest sign ificantlyin women, youth, and seniors. Member Cella asked if there is a way to preserve aglow- stress environment at Braemar, similar to the one residents are in support of at Fred Richards. Ms. Kattreh responded it would be possible. The master planning process would determine the best allocation for those 36, holes of golf. Chair Steel summarized that a working group would be formed, and it would come before the Park Board to be sure the residents are being served. Member Jones questioned the timeline of the decision - making process. She asked about an improved communications process with neighbors. Mr.' Neal communicated the input is being gathered, and if there is some interest in meeting with representatives of the Fred Richards group, that can happen. Chair Steel indicated she is adamant there has to be a clear public process going forward, and a timeline to allow for the facilitation of ideas. However, she does not think that time would change the financials before the Park Board tonight. Member Gieseke concurred, noting something needs to change, but he would also like more public discussion about the future of Fred Richards. Member Deeds stated he likes Fred Richards, but the city has more holes of golf than the city can support. Fred Richards is the least utilized asset of the park system. This is a hard decision before the city. He applauded the staffs work on the pro formas. Given the future investment needed in Fred Richards, a convincing case is made that there are too many holes of golf. He suggested every effort be made to create the same atmosphere Braemar for the kids, but Braemar must be invested in. Member Cella concurred with Member Deeds' comments. She would like to have specific programming language that Braemar must create the stress -free opportunities for youth and those new to golf. Member Jacobson wondered whether Fred Richards could be changed into something that is more like a park and not a business. Student Member Johnson suggested the Braemar improvements be separated from the issue of closing Fred Richards. Member Segreto made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, that the Park Board recommendation to the City Council that the golf operations proposals, including the recommended closing of Fred Richards Golf Course, be supported. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. 6 .1 Motion carried. V.B. Seasonal Off-Leash Dog Area at Strachauer Park Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director, asked,to make the off -leash dog area at Strachauer Park a permanent amenity. After the first year, no complaints were received regarding barking or increased traffic at the park. Staff feels using hockey rinks year -round makes sense and it also provides an off -leash area in this.area of Edina. Chair Steel opened the public hearing at 9:15 p.m.. No one spoke.. Chair Steel closed the public hearing at 9:15 p.m. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to make the off -leash area at Strachauer Park a permanent amenity. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. Vt. COMMUNITY COMMENT Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, stated after four years of process, the city has not developed a process.for maintaining the former Public Works 3.3 -acre site. She asked the Park Board to recommend to the City Council to preserve the Grandview land for public use and to prioritize a new Community Center. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VILA. Pamela Park Shelter Building Working Group Ms. Kattreh asked for Park Board approval for the creation of the working group and also for Park Board member participation on the working group. Member Segreto volunteered to join the working group. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Member Gieseke, to approve the working group. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion carried. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. Council Updates No discussion. VIII.B. Other Correspondence No discussion. VIII.C. Veterans Memorial Committee, December 20, 2013 Minutes No discussion. IX. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS None. 7 X. STAFF COMMENTS Ms. Kattreh made the following comments: there will be a Park Board work group with the Council on . February 18; so far, 49 of the 55 plots of the community garden are rented; staff has been talking with the Minnesota Wild about using Braemar Ice Arena as a permanent practice facility, and hopes to have a proposal before the Park Board at the March meeting. XL ADJOURNMENT Chair Steel made a motion, seconded by Member Deeds, to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Ayes: Members Jones, Gieseke, Steel, Segreto, Cella, Deeds, Jacobson. Motion Carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. 8 n >1 O IHHf± To: MAYOR & COUNCIL Agenda Item #: VIII- A. From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Ordinance No. 2014 -03 Amending Chapter 2 of Edina Code Regarding Boards and Commissions Action Requested: Adopt Ordinance No. 2014 -03 waiving second reading. Information / Background: During the Boards and Commission appointment process this year it became apparent that another position was desired on the Energy and Environment Commission. Staff has prepared the attached Ordinance amending Chapter 2 Division 3, Subsection 2 -139 of the City Code to make these changes. We recommend the Council adopt the ordinance along with waiving the second reading to facilitate the appointment of Board and Commission members. Attachments: Ordinance No. 2014 -03' City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING THE ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION I. Section 2 -139 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Division 3. Energy & Environment Commission Sec. 2 -139. Membership. The commission shall consist of eleven ten regular and two student members. SECTION 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: March 4, 2014. Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From:' Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Resolution No. 2014 -26 Accepting Various Donations Action Requested: Adopt Resolution. w91��f�r IPPP Agenda Item #: VIII. C. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Information / Background: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. Attachments: - Resolution No. 2014 -26 City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 I . RESOLUTION NO. 2014-26 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Park & Recreation Department Dow Chemical $1,000.00 Edina Rotary Club $2,900.00 Dated: March 4, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Recycling Containers — Edible Playground AR &LE Larry Nelson Golf Program James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Bill Neuendorf Economic Development Manager Date: March 4, 2014 o (e o.. EJ Agenda Item #: VIII. D. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ Subject: 50th and France Parking Ramps and Related Streetscape Improvements No. P -23 Resolution No. 2014 -18 Action Requested: Adopt Resolution 2014 -18 accepting the feasibility study, approving Improvement No. P -23, authorizing plans and specifications to be prepared and authorizing bids taken. 1� Information / Background: NOTE: The content of the Feasibility Study, proposed Resolution and Staff Report has not materially changed since the Public Improvement Hearing was conducted on February 18, 2014. Changes have been made, however, to proposed Ordinance 2014 -2 (Item VIII. E.) to reflect expressed concerns. For several years, the City has discussed different ways to improve public parking conditions at 50th and France. For the last six months, City staff and Kimley -Horn Associates worked closely with the local business community and other stakeholders to identify a cost - effective scope of work that could achieve the collective goals. This effort culminated in the January 21, 2014 Feasibility Study for Improvements No. P -23. Throughout the evaluation period, great attention was given to include the perspectives of property owners, business operators, employees, customers and other community stakeholders. A volunteer Project Advisory Team met to discuss goals and a variety of alternatives, .a public open house was held and 9 focus group sessions were convened. Additionally, a survey of business concerns and a customer survey were also conducted. The project scope and scheduling was determined based on this information. The proposed work is described in the attached presentation and includes necessary repairs and maintenance as well as capital improvements to enhance the function and use of the three existing parking ramps. Expansion of a parking ramp is not proposed at this time. The total proposed budget is $5,685,000. Repair and maintenance items are estimated to cost $3,310,000 City of Edina •_ 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 and maintenance costs, as well as future annual maintenance and operational costs will be borne by the property owners and funded through the special assessment process. The Feasibility Study also presumes that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority will fund the capital improvements to the City-owned ramps. The preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix E of the Feasibility Study. The methodology for distributing special assessments dates to 1974. Based on the number of changes that have occurred in the last 40 years, ,it is time to update this policy. The updated preliminary assessment roll is based not on square foot of the property but on the parking demand of each parcel, as determined by the Edina Zoning Code. This approach assesses a greater amount to parcels that generate higher demand, like restaurants and theaters while parcels that provide some of their own parking on -site are assessed a lower amount. The proposed new approach and updated preliminary assessment roll is attached. A City Council work session is scheduled to discuss the method by which Special Assessment projects at 50th and France are distributed among the individual properties. The major improvements intended for 2014 and 2015 are anticipated to be assessed to the properties upon completion of the work in fall 2015. For 2014, the only assessed costs will be the regular maintenance and operation costs that are traditionally assessed in the Fall. Assessment Hearings will be conducted prior to the assessments. The Feasibility Study was also informed by a Project Management Team that included representatives from several City Departments: Engineering, Public Works, Planning and Administration. Staff has reviewed the Feasibility Study and feels that the proposed project is necessary, cost - effective and feasible. Attachments: Resolution No. 2014 -18 Summary of Improvement P -23 (6- pages) Potential Special Assessment methodology (I -page) Preliminary Assessment Roll (I -page) Certificate of Mailing Notice (3- pages) il RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -18 ORDERING IMPROVEMENT NO. P =23,' 50TH AND FRANCE PARKING AND WAYFINDING IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a resolution the City Council adopted the 21st day of January 2014 fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. P -23, the proposed improvements to the public parking ramps and wayfinding system at 50th and France; and . WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the improvement hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 18th day of February, 2014, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the cost responsibility for these improvements is to be shared by the impacted properties and the City whereby the property owners will be responsible for maintenance and operating costs while.the City is responsible for costs of capital improvements; and WHEREAS, assessment hearings will be conducted in the future to identify the actual cost of each impacted property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: I. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to improve the public parking ramps and related streetscape, including a wayfinding system. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The Public Works Director is hereby designated with the responsibility for this improvement and shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared to complete such improvement. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvements from the proceeds of tax - exempt bonds. Dated: March 4, 2014 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 4, 2014, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk J/ Agenda Mon �M '1 Public Involvement ■ Proposed Improvements ■ Financing o Proposed Parking Policy Changes ■ Schedule3 ■ Future Projects I 2/12/2014 1 Public Involvement ■ Project Management Team - 7 Meetings Project Advisory Team - 7 Meetings Open House - September 18 Focus Group Meetings - 9 Meetings in Oct. a� Business/ Property Owner Survey- Oct. -- - =.. =- Customer Survey -Dec. I 1 7 n3 x u3 iR S $1,300,000 Ramp Repairs and Maintenance $5,685,000 TOTAL REPAIR AND CAPITAL COST 2/12/2014 2 Proposed Improvements Repairs and Capital Improvements $ 650,000 Increase Lighting Brightness $ 100,000 Parking Ramp Pedestrian Access $1,100,000 Elevatorin South Ramp _ 1 $ 350,000 Dynamic Public Parking Wayfinding System $1,375,000 Paint Ramp Interiors and South Ramp Exterior 3_ $ 60,000 Screen Garbage Areas q $ 25,000 Replace Dead / Dying Trees $ 500,000 Replace Broken Pavers q $ 175,000 Automatic Irrigation System $ 50,000 Repair Planter Beds $1,300,000 Ramp Repairs and Maintenance $5,685,000 TOTAL REPAIR AND CAPITAL COST 2/12/2014 2 _ Proposed Improvements Financing Annual Operations and Maintenance Costs Sources of Funds -_ -,,-� " $ $ 250,000 Current Annual Assessment 35,000 Holiday Season Parking Strategies Repairs and Capital Improvements Y $ 10,000 South Ramp Elevator Maintenance $5,685,000 Repairs and Capital Improvements 10,000 Parking Wayfinding System Maintenance $ 30,000 Annual Ramp Power Washing $ 10,000 Improve Sanitation j 'l $ 5,000 Automatic Irrigation System Maintenance a tiy,,,tiZ $ 100,000 Escrow for Future Periodic Preventative Maint n3 e $ 450,000 ANNUAL O&M COSTS t, Financing Sources of Funds Repairs and Capital Improvements $3,310,000 Assessments $2,375,000 Other City Funds $5,685,000 Repairs and Capital Improvements 11 Annual Maintenance Improvements j $ 350,000 Assessments in $ 100,000 Parking Permit Revenues _ $ 450,000 Annual Maintenance Improvements e 2/12/2014 3 _ Financing Assumptions �- Sources ■ Capital Costs Paid By City ■ Periodic Repairs Paid By Parking Permit Fees ■ Maintenance Costs Paid by Assessments n "� o Peak employee parking demand is estimated to 11 Assessment Assumptions a3 J ■ $3,310,000 Total Capital Cost 11 " s ■ 20 Year Term a ■ Assessment Based On Individual Property Parkins' 93 Demand _ Proposed Parking Policy Changes 501i & France District Designate approximately 230 additional employee parking stalls and monitor employee parking demand. o Peak employee parking demand is estimated to be as great as 750 stalls, but only 430 permit n parking spaces are currently provided. 11 o Consider making the top two levels of the Middle Ramp and lowest level of the North Ramp "5 -Hour 93 and Employee" parking. Increase employee permit parking annual fee from . a $60 to at least $120. Tiered employee parking permit structure is being contemplated. o Changes will go into effect in April 2014. ■ Customer parking will remain free. 2/12/2014 4 ` Schedule Final Design/ Public Involvement Feb -May, 2014 Bid Opening May 22, 2014 Award Contract June 3, 2014 1 Edina Art Fair June 6 -8, 2014 Start 2014 Construction June 16, 2014 n Interim Construction Completion October2014 2014 Holiday Shopping Season Nov -Dec, 2014 ] l �1, Start 2015 Construction March 2015 03 Edina Art Fair June 2015 Jo Construction Complete October 2015' Finalize Assessments Fall 2015 Construction will be phased to reduce impacts to businesses during construction. Future Projects These projects are recommended but not feasible at this time: ■ Parking Ramp Expansion (140 - 200 Stalls) ■ Middle Ramp Elevator n i I gg] 83 r 1 2/12/2014 5 2/12/2014 0 e ,4 'f iJ CITY OF EDINA 5O" and France Commercial Area Special Assessment Policy Background The Edina City Code (Chapter 23, Article V) addresses the City's and property owner's responsibility related to the public parking facilities and other public infrastructure at the 501h and France Commercial Area. Section 26 -167 states in part that all costs for work incurred shall be charged to each owner of each parcel of land "in proportion to the benefits conferred upon the lot or parcel." The original concept for assessing the maintenance and operational costs for the public parking facilities dates back to 1974. The original methodology was based on the floor area of each building (as built in 1974) plus an adjustment for buildings that were deemed to have expansion potential at that time. In 1978, the methodology was amended to clarify that properties that were not deemed to have expansion potential must still make a contribution to the costs of public improvements. The details of the original methodology are not readily understandable with four decades of changes. Poised with a significant reinvestment, it is desirable to update the special assessment policy. Purpose An updated special assessment policy will more accurately distribute the cost of shared improvements in a transparent, fair and equitable manner. Methodology After investigating several options, the following method will be used to distribute shared costs of the commercial area among the benefiting properties. Each commercially -zoned parcel will be assessed for its portion of costs related to the maintenance, and operation of public parking facilities and related rights -of -way. The method of distributing the costs shall be as follows: 1) The usable area of each building located on each improved parcel shall be identified. a. Gross building area.(GBA) shall be determined using information from the Edina Assessing Department. The use of each portion of the building shall be determined using information from the Edina Assessing, Fire or Building Departments. Residential units with dedicated parking are excluded 2) The parking required of each building shall be calculated using the Edina Zoning Code based on the use(s) in the building. The provisions for a shopping center with shared parking shall be applied. 3) The available on -site parking spaces (if any) shall be identified and deducted from the required parking to determine the unmet parking need of each building. 4) The unmet parking need of each building shall be compared to the total unmet parking in the commercial area to determine the proportion of special assessments attributable to each building. This method shall be applied each time that public improvements are undertaken and assessed to the properties in the 50th and France Commercial Area. Adopted by City Council (February 18, 2014) DRAFT Page 11 Map No. 1 Parcel I.D. No. 18 -028 -24- 14-0016 Primary Tenant or Building Name Walgreens Drug Tax Payer of Record I William C Knapp Gross Building Area (SF) 11,138 General Description The.t.r & Restaurant Retail & Se,ske (SF) 8,018 Prof. Office (SF) Residen- tial (SF) 0 Un-usable (SF) 1 3,120 Total Parking Required 40 On-site parking stalls 1 15 Unrnet parking demand 1 25 % total unmet demand / Percent Total Assessment 1 1.25% 2 18- 028 -24 -14 -0024 Bespoke Salon & former Thrivent 49.5 LLC 5,441 5,441 0 0 27 7 20 1.00% 3 18- 028 -24 -14 -0035 former Hooten Cleaners Soon Yong Park/Jung Ja Park 5,061 5,061 0 0 25 13 12 0.60% 4 18 -028 -24 -14 -0108 U.S. Post Office LB 49th 1/2 Street LLC 7,682 6,026 0 1,656 30 25 5 0.25% 5 18 -028- 24-14 -0132 S aion Montage- main Frank Holdings LLC 11,493 9,755 1,738 0 0 57 0 57 2.84% 5 18 -028 -24 -14 -0133 Spalon - former house Frank Holdings LLC 2,304 2,304 0 0 11 0 11 0.55% 5 18- 028 -24 -14 -0132 TBD Fashion Avenue Frank Holdings LLC 4,880 3,294 1,586 0 0 24 0 24 1.20% 6 18- 028 -24 -14 -0118 Gretchen House OMG Properties LLC 4,567 3,395 0 1 1,172 17 0 17 0.85% 7 18- 028. 24-14 -0020 cip Hue, France Avenue Partnership 6,519 0 3,668 0 2,851 18 0 18 0.90% 8 18- 028 - 24-14 -0021 Beaujos, Papersource France Avenue Partnership 11,394 1,302 3,474 2,379 0 4,239 39 0 39 1.95% 9 18- 028 -24 -14 -0022 Mozza mia / Hot Mama Edina Properties Inc. 31,471 9,446 19,101 0 2,924 159 0 159 7.93% 10 18- 028 - 24-14 -0122 Al Johnson Clothing, etal Property Administration Co 14,070 5,901 4,844 0 3,325 54 0 54 2.69% 11 18 -028- 24 -14 -0121 AT Home Designs / Prahna JSG Company LLP 12,960 6,480 6,480 0 0 65 0 65 3.24% 12 I8- 028 - 24- 14-0126 Edina 5-0 Mall L A Real Estate Group, Et Al 80,265 5,692 32,045 27,437 0 15,091 339 0 339 16.91% 13 18- 028 -24-14 -0046 US Bank First Building Corporation 44,420 44,420 0 0 222 116 106 5.29% 13 18- 028 - 24-14 -0044 US Bank parking First Building Corporation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 13 58- 028 - 24-14 -0045 US Bank drive thru First Building Corporation 3,352 1,676 0 1,676 8 0 8 0.40% 13 18- 028 - 24-14 -0047 US Bank parking First Building Corporatlon 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 13 18- 028 - 24-14 -0109 US Bank parking First Building Corporation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 14 18 -028 -24-41 -0178 Lund's Foods Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 32,204 32,204 1 0 1 D 161 1 69 92 4.59% 14 18- 028 - 24-01 -0175 Lund's Foods Parking Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15 18- 028 -24-41 -0182 50th and France Office Building A K Larson Family LLC 39,685 3,796 7,551 16,676 0 11,662 155 0 155 7.73% 16 18- 028 -24-01 -0050 3925 Building Edina Properties Inc. 11,826 3,942 3,942 0 3,942 39 0 39 1.95% 16 18- 028 -24-41 -0049 3925 Building Edina Properties Inc. 24,730 10,702 10,975 0 3,053 108 0 108 5.39% 17 18- 028 -24-41 -0052 Edina Theater JSG Company LLP 32,424 28,345 2,136 0 1,943 282 0 282 14.06% 18 18- 028- 24-41 -0383 RF Moeller, Edina Grill, TCF Bank, Cos Bar 5000 France Company 22,233 4,383 17,850 0 124 0 124 6.18% 19 18- 028 -24-41 -0055 Salut Bistro / Oliver & Taylor France at 50th LLC 16,368 7,436 748 8,184 0 0 102 0 102 5.09% 20 18 -028- 24-01 -0066 Cocina Del Barrio 5036 France Property LLC 7,407 4,847 2,560 0 0 56 0 56 2.79% 21 18- 028 -24-41 -0237 BMO Hams Americana Bank of Edina 19,102 19,102 0 0 96 29 67 3.34% 22 18 -028 -24-41 -0181 Edina Liquor City of Edina 8,572 4,286 0 4,286 21 0 21 1.05% 18 -028 -24 -14 -0026 former Edina Realty City of Edina 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 471,568 65,247 193,382 151,999 0 60,940 100.00% 13.8% 41.0% 32.2% 12.9% 50 /France P -23 - preliminary special assessment roll February 12, 2014 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date February 5, 2014, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for 50th & France Parking And Wayfinding, Improvement No. P -23 (Exhibit' A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their, respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day.of j 20Lt�-- . Edina City Clerk February 5, 2014 Notice of Public Hearing 50' & France Parking And Wayfinding Improvement No. P-23 The Edina City Council will conduct a public hearing at Edina City Hall on Tuesday, February 18, 2014 at 7:00 p.m. to consider parking and wayfinding improvements in the 50' & France Business District This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2014 and spring 2015 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2015. The estimated project cost is $5,685,000. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is anticipated to contribute $2,375,000 towards the proposed capital improvements. The cost of maintenance and repairs ($3,310,000) is proposed to be funded by special assessment distributed among the benefiting parcels. If the total estimated cost were to be assessed, the rate would be $12.06 per square foot. Considering the potential contribution from the Edina HRA, the estimated assessable cost would be reduced to $7.02 per square foot. The special assessment can be divided over a twenty -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. Please note that the Parking and Wayfinding Improvements No. P -23 is in addition to the annual maintenance and operations assessment The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes a total of 471,568 square feet of gross building area located at the following addresses: 3909, 3918, 3944, and 3948 West 49' '/z Street; 3902, 3906, 3907, 3911, 3917 -3925, 3930, 3939, 3943, 3945, and 4100 West 50' Street; 4916, 4924, 4930, 4936, 4948, 5034, 5036, and 5050 France Avenue South. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Read the feasibility study online at http://edinarhn.gov/index.phl2?section=50th-France-Parkin . This public hearing is your last opportunity to comment on the project You may: *Write to City of Edina, Attention Bill Neuendorf, 4801 W. 501" Street, Edina, MN 55424 -Email to mail @EdinaMN.gov, attention City Council and Bill Neuendorf •Attend the public hearing and offer comments.. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952 -826 -0371 . Fax 952- 826 -0392 Easy Oeel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51600 - 1802824140016 William C Knapp Attn: Accounting 5000 Westown Parkway Suite 400 West Des Moines, IA 50266 1802824140108 LB 49th 1/2 Street LLC Attn: Jennfier Kent 410050th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140118 OMG Properties LLC 4930 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55410 1802824140022 Edina Properties Inc. 4100 50th Street W. Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140126 L A Real Estate Group, Et Al 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410182 A K Larson Family LLC 3939 50th Street W, Suite 200 Edina, MN 55424 1802824410052 JSG Company LLP 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1802824410066 5036 France Property LLC 5036 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55410 A O Bendalong lineto i o AVERY® 596OTM d Feed Paper �� expose Pop-up Edge m 1 1802824140024 1802824140035 49.5 LLC Soon Yong Park & Jung Ja Park C/O John D Gross 5275 Grandview Square Suite 3308 4520 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55424 1802824140132 1802824140133 Frank Holdings LLC Frank Holdings LLC 5223-Edina Industrial Boulevard 5223 Edina Industrial Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Edina, MN 55441 1802824140020 1802824140021 France Avenue Partnership France Avenue Partnership C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. C/O K.C.S. Property Management Co. 810012th Avenue S, Suite 200 810012th Avenue S, Suite 200 Bloomington, MN 55425 Bloomington, MN 55425 1802824140122 1802824140121 Property Administration Co JSG Company LLP 3922 50th Street W 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Edina, MN 55424 Minnetonka, MN 55343 1802824140046 1802824410178 First Building Corporation Lund Real Estate Holdings LLC C/O US Bank N.A. 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 2800 E Lake Street Edina; MN 55424 Minneapolis, MN 55406 1802824410049 1802824410050 Edina Properties Inc. Edina Properties Inc. 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 4100 50th Street W, Suite 2100 Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55425 1802824410383 1802824410055 5000 France Company France at 50th LLC 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 7800 Metro Parkway, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Bloomington, MN 55425 1802824410237 1802824410181 Americana Bank of Edina City of Edina Excel Bank of Edina Edina Liquor P.O. Box 1509 480150th Street W Minneapolis, MN 55480 Edina, MN 55424 Etiquettes faciles a peler Sens de Repllea a la hachure afro de; www averycom ::te::�.,. r....a:,�r:f A \ /CDV® C7CA® rAVAIAr IA rphnrd Pen.:mTM I 1- 900-GO -AVERY To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL w91�A,1� ch Ev,? � • ,�`�b1tIY�Rf+CCO � �BHff Agenda Item #: VIII. E. From: Bill Neuendorf Action N Economic Development Manager Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 201-4 Information ❑ Subject: Second Reading. Parking Permit Policy and Fees in 50th and France Commercial, District, Ordinance 2014 -2 and Parking Time Limits for Municipal Parking Facilities, Resolution 2014 -27 Action Requested: Approve Ordinance 2014 -2, approve Resolution 2014 -27, and authorize the proposed parking policy to be implemented by the City Manager. Information / Background: The 50th and France Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study recommends that adjustments be made to the City's current parking management strategy so that the existing parking stalls can be used more efficiently. During the several months of data gathering leading up to the Feasibility Study, several concerns were identified which influence the proposed changes to the fee structure and employee parking policy: • Businesses and the City agree that customer parking takes priority over employee parking. • Both property owners and business operators oppose charging customers a fee to park. • The peak period is Monday- Friday around the lunch hour. • The South Ramp is the most heavily used. • The rooftops of all ramps are the least used. • Both customers and employees prefer to park in the most convenient stalls. • There are estimated to be 1,000 (full and part time) employees. • There are approximately 750 employees in the maximum shift during the holiday season. • In 2013, approximately 620 parking permits were issued to employees. • There are currently 430 stalls designated for employee parking. • A limited number of employees currently commute by means other than driving alone. • Some employees avoid purchasing permits and park in areas designated for customers. • Business owners are split in how to manage employee behavior; some businesses purchase permits for employees, other businesses leave compliance to the discretion of the employee. • Law enforcement has difficulty identifying employee vehicles without a permit. • Businesses prefer enforcement methods that do not deter customers. A combination of policy changes is proposed to achieve conditions that retain and attract customers while also addressing the needs of employees. Due to the anticipated construction in Summer 2014, these changes are proposed to be rolled out slowly beginning in April 2014 with. additional adjustments considered in 2015. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Hourly Limits (Resolution 2014 -27) The recent customer survey indicates that approximately 66% of customers stay for 3 hours or less. The current 5 -hour time limit can make it easy for part -time employees to park in customer locations. Some of the 5 -hour limits are proposed to be reduced to 2 -hour and 3 -hour limits. These changes will satisfy the needs of short -term and medium -term customers while encouraging long -term customers and employees to park in the more remote stalls. New signage will be installed to reflect the new requirements. The proposed changes are indicated on the attached diagrams. Parking Permit Fees Currently, employees of Edina businesses located at 50th and France have the opportunity to park in excess of the posted hourly limits if they purchase a parking permit for $5.00 per month. The current fee is significantly below the monthly cost to operate & maintain the public parking facilities. In 2015, for example, $450,000 is anticipated to be spent on maintenance and operations for 1,022 public parking stalls. This equates to $37.50 per stall per month. simply for basic operating costs, not to mention the debt service associated with $5.7 million in capital repairs and improvements. With business owners and operators asking to improve overall conditions in the ramps, the need to increase the fee is apparent. For 2014, the monthly fee is proposed` to be raised to $10.00. An overnight fee ($50 monthly) for commercial vehicles is also proposed. In: 2015, a tiered fee structure. This future strategy is anticipated to provide lower cost parking in the least desirable locations and will charge a higher fee in more desirable locations. Staff has met with several business operators and representatives from the 50th and France Business Association and determined that the new rates do not place too great a burden on employees. Based on the new fee, approximately $54,000 is estimated to be generated for the remainder of 2014. These funds will be available for public improvements in the 50th and France Commercial Area and will reduce the annual operating and maintenance costs that are accessed to each property. Employee Parking Locations When new permits are issued in April 2014, most employee stalls will be shifted out of the South Ramp and moved to the Middle and North Ramps. Employees are encouraged to park in the highest levels of the ramps so that customers can enjoy the most convenient parking locations. These locations will be monitored and adjustments may be considered in 2015. The location and number of employee stalls is identified in the proposed Parking Permit Policy implemented by the City Manager and illustrated in the attached diagrams. Employee Permit Policy Proposed changes to the City Code will mandate that every employee who chooses to park in the City of Edina ramps must purchase a parking permit. Penalties will be assessed to those that fail to comply. Employers will be asked to help educate employees. Signs will be posted to alert employees of the new law. Enforcement Policy Changes are also proposed to the City Code so, that it is easier to enforce the permit policy and issue tickets or tow vehicles when necessary. Commuting Options The City and 50th and France Business Association continue to work cooperatively with Commuter Services and Metro Transit to encourage employees to travel by bus or bicycle and avoid parking in the ramps. Current efforts include: - Promotion of Metro Pass program, to large,.employers (spring 2014) - Promotion of ridesharing/carpooling program to all employees (spring 2014) - Promotion of Bike to Work Week Qune 1.6 -20, 2014) Addition of new bicycle and pedestrian facilities as part of the Ramp and Streetscape reconstruction Improvements to Metro Transit facilities as part of the Ramp and Streetscape reconstruction Consideration of bus routes and schedules, based on the needs of local businesses In additional to the changes in City Code, authorization is also requested to implement a new parking policy that guides locations where employees may and may not park This request is based on Section 24 -397 which delegates parking management authority to the City Manager The proposed policy is also attached. Attachments: Ordinance No. 2014 -2 Resolution 2014 -27 Diagrams of existing and proposed conditions Proposed Parking Permit Policy This page intentionally left blank. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 AND 24 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING PERMITS FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A (fees and charges) to Code Section 2- 274 are amended to read as follows: Article and Division Chapter and Section Purpose of fee or charges Amount Terms Article VIII, division 5 24 -397 (b) PaFICiAg peF $540 Per- FAeRth rer-ated $3 98 PeF .rpt--meQ FR PFeFated Employee Parking permit Overnight business vehicle permit 1$ 0.00 5$ 0.00 Per month Per month Section 2. Section 24 -395 of the Edina City Code is amended to add the following definition: Overnight Parking means parking a vehicle in a municipal parking facility during the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Section 3. Section 24 -396 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: (a) No. person shall park any vehicle in any municipal parking facility heUFS (1) For a period in excess of the designated time limits; eF (2) In a location designated as " ep rmit parking only," unless the vehicle displays a parking stiekee ep rmit issued pursuant to this article; (3) In violation of the parking restrictions provided under Section 24 -397: or (4) Outside of the marked boundaries for each individual parking stall. (b) Except as otherwise provided, PDersons, may park in any municipal parking facility for any length of time during non-business hours, except for such times as parking may be prohibited for snow removal, repairs and 'glee- pUFpeses-. o, by order of the manager. , Neo overnight parking shall be allowed unless the vehicle displays a temporary or overnight parking permit issued pursuant to Ssections 24- 397(d) or (e)'-and is parked .in the designated tempora!:j or overnight parking location. Section 4. Section 24- 397(b) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Employee Parking Permits. (1) Requirement. Individuals employed in that portion of the 50, and France Commercial Area located in the city must obtain a parking K -- - - - -- - - - N W3 -- -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- -- - -- - -- - - - -- - -- -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- _Q wig ,_: Employee Parking Permits. (1) Requirement. Individuals employed in that portion of the 50, and France Commercial Area located in the city must obtain a parking K municipal parking facility designated for employee parking by resolution of the city council or by the manager: Issuance of Parking Permits. Permit stickers shall be issued '_by the employees of the 501 receiving a parking permit, the "applicant shall pay a fee as set forth in section 2 -724 and furnish an acknowledgement of employment by a business located within the 504 and France Commercial Area within the City, together with proof of ownership and a.description of the permitted vehicle. Parking permits shall be valid only for the calendar year in which issued. Parking permit stickers shall be fastened in the location designated by the manager and shall be visible at all times when the vehicle is parked in the designated municipal parking facility. (3) Replacement Permits. Permittees may obtain a replacement permit for an alternate vehicle upon completing the appropriate application form accompanied by the requisite vehicle and ownership information. Upon issuance, the original parking permit shall be cancelled. The one additional household vehicle used.by the permittee upon completing the appropriate application form accompanied by the requisite vehicle and ownership information. (4 Parking Permit Cancellation. A permittee who ceases to be employed by a business in the 501h and France Commercial Area of the City shall notify the city upon termination of employment and the parking permit shall be cancelled. The city may cancel a parking permit for any violation of this section or a policy adopted by the city concerning the use of the municipal parking facility. (5) Regulations. (a) The issuance of a parking permit will not guarantee the availability of parking space at any specific location or time. The unavailability of a parking space within a designated permit area will not entitle a permittee to any reimbursement or ability to use any non- permitted parking stall. (b) Permittees under this section must park the vehicle front -end forward into any parking stall within the municipal parking facility. (c) Parking in a municipal parking facility in violation of the provisions of this section by failing to obtain a permit or park in the designated permit location is a violation of this section and will be punishable pursuant to subsection (fl. Section S. Section 24 -397 of the Edina City Code is amended to add new subsections (e) and (f).to read as,foilows: (e) Business Overnight Parking Permit Businesses within the 50, and France Commercial Area of the city may be issued by the manager or the manager's designee an overnight parking permit for a business vehicle. An eligible business shall submit an application. for an overnight parking permit accompanied by. the business hours and mU park. between the hours of 1:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., but only in locations in the municipal parking facility designated by the manager. The overnight vehicle parking permit shall be displayed in a manner prescribed by the manager. (fl Violations. It is unlawful to park a motor vehicle contrary to the provisions of this section. A violation of this section is a petty misdemeanor. Vehicles parked in violation of these requirements for a minimum of 4 hours may be towed in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 16813.035 and .04. Altering or falsifying a.parking permit shall be considered a violation of this section. Police officers, community service officers, and parking monitors shall be responsible for enforcing the parking reauirements and regulations of this section pursuant to the provisions of Section 26 -167. Section 6. Section 24 -398 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: The manager shall post OR areas established by this artiele. the time limits and designated permit parking areas established by this article in all municipal parking facilities. Section 7. This ordinance is effective April I, 2014. First Reading: February 18, 2014 Second Reading: March 4, 2014 Published: 4 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk This page intentionally left blank. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -27 ESTABLISHING PARKING TIME LIMITS FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES WHEREAS, Division 5, Article VIII of Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code regulates municipal parking facilities; WHEREAS, Section 24 -395 of the City Code provides that time limits for parking within municipal. parking facilities are established by resolution of the city council; WHEREAS, the City desires to establish time limits for parking within municipal parking facilities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the following time limits for municipal parking facilities are hereby adopted: Municipal Parking Facility No. Stalls (approximate) Hourly Time Limits During Business Hours South Ramp Lower Level 80 2 -hours First Level 110 2 -hours (typical) 15- minute (I stall) Second Level 110 5 -hours Third Level 114 5 -hours 51 st Street Alley Surface 6 1 -hour Middle Ramp First Level 90 3 -h6urs (typical) 15- minute (2 stalls) Second Level 90 3 -hours Third Level 94 5 -hours W. 49-1/2 St. (Clancy) Lot Surface 36 1 -hour (typical) 15- minute (3 stalls) Municipal Parking Facility No. Stalls:. (approximate) Hourly Time Limits During Business Hours North Ramp Lower Level 45 2 -hours First Level 72 2 -hours Second Level 72 2 -hours Third Level 72 5 -hours 3943 W. 50th St. Lot Surface 15 1 -hour (typical) 10- minute (2 stalls) Attest ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 4th day of March, 2014. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Edina City Council on March 4, 2014, with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this day of , 2014. CITY CLERK 4 I 5 &France Parking Ramp Allocation — E�X�ISTING CONDITIONS South Ramp 414 stalls Level..3 — 114 rooftop 5 -hr customer &employee Level 2 - 110 covered 90: 2 -hr customer only 20: 5 =hr customer & employee Level 1 - 110 covered 2 -hr customer only Middle Ram p 274 stalls Level 3 - 94 rooftop 5 -hr customer only Level 2 - 90 covered 5 -hr customer only Level 1- 90 covered 2 -hr customer only North Ramp 262 stalls Level 3 - 72 rooftop 5 -hr customer & employee Level 2 - 72 covered 5- hr customer & employee Level 1 - 72 covered 5 -hr customer & employee Lower Level = 80 covered Lower Level - 45 covered Employee only (Mon -Sat 8 AM 2 -hr customer only to 6 PM); other times customers France Ave — 20 surface 2 -hour customer only Clancy lot— 36 surface 1 -hour customer only 50th near Lunds —15 surface 1 -hour customer only 515t alley way — 6 surface 1 -hour customer only February 26, 2014 South Middle North Surface Total ** Fee Structure Customer Only = 200 274 45 77 596 1 58% $60 for Employee Employee Only* — 80 0 0 0 80 8% Permit, valid April Customer & Employee = 134 0 217 0 351 34% to March; pro - Total = 414 274 262 77 1,027 100% rated at per month * During peak period only ** Does not include 305 parking stalls on private property February 26, 2014 South Ramp 414 stalls Level 3 — 114 rooftop 5 -hour customer only, Level 2 - 110 covered 5 -hour customer only Level 1 - 110 covered 2 -hour customer only 50h &France Parking Ramp Allocation — PROPOSED April eo December 2014 Middle Ramp 274 stalls Level 3 - 94 rooftop 5 -hour customer & e ploy Level 2 - 90 covered 3 -ho iur customer & ee Level 1 - 90 covered 3` ur customer only North Ramp 262 stalls Level 3` 72 rooftop 5 -hour customer & employee Level 2 - 72 covered 2- hours customer & employee Level 1 - 72 covered 2 -h lour customer & employee Lower Level — 80 covered Lower Level - 45 covered Employee only (M -F 8 AM to 4 2 -hour customer & ee PM other times customers France Ave — 20 surface 2 -hour customer only Clancy lot — 36 surface 1 -hour customer only 50th near Lunds -15 surface 1 -hour customer only 51St alley way — 6 surface 1 -hour customer only Yellow highlights indicates change from 2013 practice. February 26, 2014 South Middle North Surface Total ** Fee Structure Customer Only = 334 90 0 77 501 49% $90 for Employee Permit, valid April to December 2014; Employee Only* - 80 0 0 0 80 8% Customer & Employee = 0 184 262 0 446 43% Total = 414 274 1 262 77 1,02-7 100 % pro -rated at $1 0-per -month *During peak period only ** Does not include 305 parking stalls on private property Yellow highlights indicates change from 2013 practice. February 26, 2014 e r '1 ,J CITY OF EDINA 501h and France Commercial Area Employee Permit Parking Policy Background The Edina City Code (Section 24 -397) allows the City to issue parking permits to employees of businesses located. at 50th and France in Edina. The City Manager is authorized to designate specific locations for the employee parking. The employee parking locations "shall be those that are least convenient for patrons of the businesses located in the 501h and France Commercial Area." The January 21, 2014 Parking and Wayfinding Feasibility Study identifies several concerns with current employee parking practices and includes several recommendations to better manage parking in the public facilities. Employee Permit Parking Zones Employee vehicles that display a valid permit will be allowed to park in designated areas of the public parking ramps in excess of the posted time limits. Parking is available on a first come -first served basis. Issuance of a permit is no guarantee that a parking stall will be available at any specific time or in any specific ramp. Employee vehicles without a permit will be ticketed. Employee vehicles not parked in the designated locations will be ticketed. Overnight parking is not allowed unless the vehicle displays the proper permit and is located in designated stalls. The lowest level of the South Ramp will be posted "employee only" Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM. This area is available for both employee and customer parking at all other times. Permit Type Anticipated Location No. of Stalls Maximum Fee Available No. Permits* . South Ramp, lower level, covered 80 Middle Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop 94 $10 per Middle Ramp, 2" d level, covered 90 Employee month 990 North Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop, lower, 1" and 2nd levels, covered 252 Overnight for business vehicle for 50th $50 per North Ramp, 3`d level, rooftop & France month North Ramp, 2nd level, covered 10 10 (Edina) business Total = 526 1,000 * The maximum number of permits issued may be adjusted based on actual usage. In the future, a multi- tiered fee structure may be considered based on the preferences of the employees, customer demand and actual usage. Adopted by JitDy Couunciill ( Th 1, 2014) Page I 1 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: James Hovland Mayor Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Appointments To Advisory Boards And Commissions Action Requested: Appoint the persons listed below. w o Agenda Item #: VIII. F. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ 0 Information / Background: The City received applications for members to fill vacancies on its advisory boards, commissions and committees through the 31" day of January 2014. The City Council conducted interviews of applicants on February 6, 10 and 19, 2014. Members who were unable to meet the attendance requirement during 2013 were also interviewed on these dates with the intention of reappointment. The following slate of people has been recommended for appointment or reappointment as noted below: New Appointments — All .three -year terms ending 2/1/2017 unless noted differently () Art Center Board — Anne Miller Board of Appeal & Equalization —Scott Smith (2/1/2015) and Alex Schlichter (2/1/2015) Community Health Commission— Ginny Ogle and Michael Sackett Construction Board of Appeals — Doug Hall Energy & Environment Commission — Louise Waddick (2/1/2015) and William Glahn Heritage Preservation Board — Bruck McLellan (2/1/2016) Human Rights & Relations Commission —Ellen Kennedy, Tiffany Sanders and Derek Carter Park Board— Thomas Downing (2/1/2015), Gerard Greene and Brenda McCormick Planning Commission — Susan Lee (2/1/2015) JoAnn Olsen Transportation Commission —. Larry Olson (2/1/2016) Reappointment: Transportation Commission— Dawn Spanahke (2/1/2016) City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St • Edina, MN 55424 MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday January 9, 2014 7:02 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLL CALL. Answering Roll Call was Bale, Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Sokol, Thompson, Zarrin and Chair Sierks, Absent: Gubrud, Howard, Risser, Rudnicki Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. City of Edina Purchasing Policy. Mr. Neal, City Manager, gave an update on the first Environmental Purchasing Policy Report. The policy was adopted in 2011 and is meant to serve as a guide to the selection of goods and services that have minimal impact on the environment. The challenges were balancing cost efficiencies and payback of technologies and improvements and the effectiveness of new and emerging technologies of how to determine if the green product,is effective. Tim Barnes, Facility Manager, will help promote and communicate the policy better across the departments. Next year, the report will include what the City can't buy under the environmental policy. Mr. Neal gave an update on the McKinstry improvement project of lighting, building envelope, solar panel and water conservation on city facilities. The project guaranteed savings of $50,077 each year and the actual savings was $52,136. The majority of savings was 64 in lighting. The City reduced its carbon emissions by 292 metric tons for electricity, 85 metric tons for natural gas, and saved enough water to fill half of an Olympic pool. H. Municipal Waste and Recycling. Member Latham gave an update on recycling. Single Sort had an increase in all commodities. The Park Recycling project continues to be 'a success and more bins will be added this year. Organic Recycling continues at City Hall and Edinborough with no expansion in 2013, due to implementing of single sort recycling. There's no update on the Trash Collection reporting, because not all of the 2013 reports have been received. C. Business Recycling Task Force. Member Zarrin gave an update on lessons learned with business recycling in the community. First, there is a financial and environmental case to be made to support business recycling. Second, some businesses, want to recycle, but don't have access to do it. 'Third, some businesses have access to recycling but the'employees /customers lack training. Finally, single user facilities tend to make recycling available while fewer multiple tenant commercial properties offer recycling. Hennepin County has secured a grant to help businesses to start and /or improve recycling. D. Education and Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson reviewed the 2013 accomplishments. First, "What's up with the Weather" forurn with Paul Douglas. Second, participated in the City's July 4'h parade in conjunction with the Center for Energy and Environment. Third, Edina Day of Service had four Home Energy Squad visits. Edina Interfaith Environmental Coalition organized workshop on reducing salt use to protect waters. The 2014 goals are a "Chasing Ice" movie on January 17 'h at City Hall and the "More Than Honey" movie will be held March 21". The Earth Day celebration will be "What will Turn You on in2013" held April 29 "' at Southview Middle School with Michael Noble, Director of Fresh Energy. E. Energy i. B3. Mr. Bintner gave an update on the Building Energy Use Benchmark System which is an electricity and natural gas energy performance management for the City facilities. The Citywide Benchmark is 1.066M. Individual facilities range from 0.27BM to 2.876M. Member Zarrin excused herself from the meeting at 7:49p.m. Mr. Bintner gave a detailed update on the Public Works, City Hall and Braemar Arena buildings. Home Energy Squad. Mr. Bintner gave an update of the work done by Center for Energy and Environment. Home Energy Squad is a. 2hr visit by two energy experts that reviews door weather stripping; install compact florescent light bulbs, installation in the attic, and more. The Enhanced visit includes a blower door test and other diagnostic work for potential energy upgrades. The estimated average saving is $82 per household. iii. Renewable Energy. Member Heer said a_ goal for this year is to continue the City of Edina's Building Efficiency with additional energy improvements. Member Heer would like to review Xcel Energy's Community Solar program and learn how Edina can become involved with it. Student Initiatives i. General. Member Bale gave an update on the installation of hand dryers in the high school bathrooms to remove paper towel waste. ii. Project Earth Solar Charging. Member Sokol gave an. update on the Pilot Solar Power Project. Solar panels will run current to the media center to a charging station for student's phones, laptops, etc. G. Urban Forests Task Force. Member Latham gave an update on the Urban Forest Task Force. The report includes a Proposed policy for Emerald Ash Borer developed by the City Forester, Increase Tree Planting on public and private property, Update City of Edina Tree Ordinances 1200, 850.10, and 1055 with respect to trees, Living Streets tree planting and Review recommendations for Applicable Green Step Cities Best Practices. The Tree Preservation Ordinance for Redevelopment Projects was referred to the Planning Commission. Fl. Sustainability Task Force. Member I<ostuch gave an update on the new task force. The goal is to put in place an environmental considerations form to attach to the capital budget projects process to make the city consider environmental impacts on new projects. I. Local Food Working Group. Member Latham gave an update on the new local food working group. The goal is to implement the Green Steps Cities Local Foods Best Practice which includes Community Gardens, Chicken and Bee Keeping. In May 2013, a Community Garden of 50 plots was established in Yorktown Park. The proposed Chicken Keeping will be for Hens only and is for pest management and companion animals more so than for egg projection. The Bee Keeping needs a public education program on Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) before implementing an ordinance. The plan is to provide an educational series as follows: in March view the "More Than Honey" movie, in April provide a program on landscaping for pollinators and in May provide a program on integrated pest management for residential yards and gardens. The LFTF ultimately hopes to have a demonstration hive in a city park. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS No Comment. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS No Comment, IX. 'STAFF COMMENTS No Comment. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster L' GIS Administrator MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 18, 2014 8:55 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 8:55 p.m., ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for February 3, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AUTHORIZATION TO FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 50TH AND FRANCE PARKING RAMPS Economic Development Manager Neuendorf noted the City Council had held a hearing on proposed parking ramp and wayfinding improvements at the 501h and France Business District. He said that Kimley -Horn had prepared a Feasibility Study for Improvements No. P -23 to the public parking ramps at 50th and France. The total proposed budget was $5,685,000. Repair and maintenance items were estimated to cost $3,310,000 while the estimate for capital improvements was $2,375,000. Continuing, Mr. Neuendorf explained the City has worked with private business owners to build, operate and maintain shared public parking to support nearly 500,000 square feet of commercial space at 50th and France. Original construction of the South, Middle and North Ramps was funded by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Tax increment financing was typically used for construction costs. Like the current proposal, operating and maintenance costs were historically funded by the business owners who benefit from the ramps. Mr. Neuendorf stated that $2,375,000 was being requested from the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund to fund the improvement. He said currently the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund.has a balance of approximately $6.0 million not yet committed. That balance should increase to approximately $9.2 million after final incremental taxes have been collected in December 2014. Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Sprague authorizing the use of Centennial Lake TIF Funds to fund the proposed public parking ramp and wayfinding Improvements No. P -23 at the 50th and France Business District. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion of Commissioner Bennett, seconded. by Commissioner Swenson to recess the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting at 9:05 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Minutes /HRA /February 18, 2014 Motion carried. Motion of Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Swenson to reconvene the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting at 10:17 p.m.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-2 MODIFYING SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ESTABLISHING PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN. Mr. Neuendorf stated the Pentagon Park office park, consisting of fifteen multi - tenant office buildings, was built in the late 1960s. For several decades, it was well positioned in the market place; and had much success. In the past decade however, its dated layout and aging infrastructure has made it considerable less desirable. During the January 8, 2013 City Council work session, the Pentagon Park area was one.'of several identified as potential locations where a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District may be warranted. Since 2004, the assessed valuation of the Pentagon Park properties has declined by 60 %. The vacancy rate of some of the buildings far exceeds that of the marketplace. Nearly every building requires significant repair after several years of deferred maintenance. The area is in need of redevelopment so that this downward trend is reversed. The City retained Ehlers & Associates as well as other professionals to inspect the existing buildings, and prepare the TIF Plan and necessary modifications to the Redevelopment Project Area. LHB, Inc. inspected each building in recent months and determined that the proposed District satisfies the requirements for creation of a 26 -year TIF Redevelopment District. Hillcrest Development, the new owner envisions a complete transformation of the private properties in the future. While no specific design has been decided upon at this time, the future land use will include a mixture of uses and will likely require significant improvements in the public infrastructure. The establishment of a new Tax Increment Financing, District would allow the City to consider a public /private partnership in the future so that the full potential of this important business /mixed use district Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Swenson made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2014 -02 modifying Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, establishing Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District and tax Increment Financing Plan. Commissioner Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director A, o t Le r I • A7�ro »roaw't�� • uses To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V From: Chad A. Milliner P.E., Director of Engineering Action 0 Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Engineering Services — Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services for Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements. Information / Background: This proposal is for construction materials testing services for the France Avenue Intersection Enhancements project that includes upgrading the intersections of 66th St, 70th St, and 76th St and France Ave along with providing sidewalk facilities along the easterly side of France Ave where they do not exist today. This project is partially funded with a federal grant therefore it is required to perform Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC /QA) testing in accordance with MnDOT's Schedule of Materials Control. This proposal will ensure the project meets all the material testing requirements. The construction contract for this project was approved by City Council and the HRA on Jan. 7, 2014. Staff recommends authorizing the City Manager to approve the attached proposal. Attachments: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements, Feb. 18, 2014 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 N Braun Intertec Corporation Phone: 952.995.2000 iiooi Hampshire Avenue S Fax: 952.995.2020 Minneapolis, MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com February 18, 2014 Chad Millner, PE City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services France Avenue Improvements France Avenue between 66th Street & 76th Street S.P. 120 - 020 -037 Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Millner: Proposal BL -14 -00694 We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for construction materials testing services for the France Avenue Improvement Project for the City of Edina. Our Understanding of Project This project will include improvements to the curb and gutter and sidewalks along France Avenue from 66th Street to 76th Street. Minor storm sewer and concrete pavement improvements will also be apart of this project. This project will also include bituminous patching and paving and constructing limestone retaining walls throughout the project. This proposal is based on our review of the documents described below. If the project changes from the information provided in these documents, we may have to submit a revised scope of services and cost. Plans and Specifications dated October 21, 2013. (Digital). Discussions with Andrew Plowman with WSB & Associates, Inc. and Jamie Cynor with the City of Edina. This project is a City of Edina project with Federal funding. Projects that are constructed with Federal funding are required to perform Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC /QA) testing in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT's) Schedule of Materials Control. Personnel with MnDOT certifications must complete the monitoring and testing. Braun Intertec will perform the QA field testing on the project for the items listed in our scope and as shown on our construction materials testing cost estimate. The contractor will be responsible for performing all of the required QC testing and submitting all the documentation upon completion of the project. An audit of the project could be conducted upon completion by the funding agency. The audit may include reviewing tests and paperwork provided by your QC /QA representative. AA /EOE Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 2 The Braun Intertec Difference At Braun Intertec we strive to not only provide the essential services required to meet the minimum project requirements, but to add measureable value in assisting the client to deliver a high quality project in a timely manner. We recognize the need to provide more than solely field testing on projects in order to verify that the project requirements have been met and that the project will be audited successfully. To reach this end Braun Intertec has the largest pool of experienced certified technicians in Minnesota, knowledgeable project managers specialized in Federal, State, and State Aid projects, and a culture of customer service. This allows us to meet and exceed client expectations, verify complete and competent testing is performed, and provide a final report which includes the information necessary to successfully complete a project audit is produced. Braun Intertec has a dedicated team of expert certified staff with the experience and knowledge necessary to perform and verify compliance with the Schedule of Materials Control. Experienced Personnel At Braun Intertec we have a group of knowledgeable staff who understand how to perform the necessary tests and are MnDOT certified in each specialized field. Our extensive pool of certified employees and numerous office locations allows us to be responsive to project needs and flexible regarding project scheduling. Technicians in our metro offices have the following MnDOT certifications: ■ Aggregate Production ■ Grading & Base I ■ Grading & Base II ■ Concrete Field I ■ Concrete Field II ■ Concrete Plant I ■ Concrete Plant II ■ Bituminous Plant I ■ Bituminous Plant 11 Knowledgeable Project Managers We have a number of experienced project managers who specialize in State -Aid and Federal Projects. Their knowledge of the material certification process, MnDOT's Schedule of Material Control, required documentation, and the audit process is a valuable resource toward meeting project requirements. Our project managers are responsible for communicating test results quickly, submitting required documentation which include the preliminary and final grading and base reports, weekly concrete reports, and coordinating Independent Assurance requirements. As a result of past work our project managers have a working relationship with MnDOT staff and are able to get timely responses to questions and resolve issues to keep the project on schedule. Their specialized expertise is vital to the successful completion of the project and verifying the requirements of the project are met. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 3 Accredited Laboratory Braun Intertec is one of the few independent testing companies that is accredited by AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) in the metro area. With our accredited laboratory only eight miles away from the project site we propose to perform the laboratory tests at our corporate office location in Bloomington. With Braun Intertec's Metro Material Laboratory often working twenty -four hours a day laboratory test results are delivered in a timely and accurate manner to keep up with the project schedule and demands. Customer Service On any project, communication and establishing expectations are key to achieving customer satisfaction. To that end, our testers and project managers communicate regularly with the inspectors and project engineers. In our experience it is important to communicate material certification and testing on an ongoing basis. It is vital that information be quickly communicated to verify that all of the required testing has been completed prior to that portion of the work being completed to avoid materials exceptions at the end of the project. Braun Intertec also uses advanced technology, such as our cell phone and laptop based Metafield® program, to improve the material testing communication process. Using these tools we are able to record and report testing information quickly back to our office so that the information can be reviewed and sent to the client in a timely manner. This process allows us to provide the client with the most current information as to our compliance with the MnDOT's material certification program and project requirements. Final Materials Certification. Report As the project progresses, our experienced transportation project managers compile the project documentation into a final report designed to meet the requirements of an audit. Braun Intertec has been successfully audited numerous times on state and federally funded projects in the past and received positive feedback regarding our process. Our experience with these audits has led us to develop the format for our final report in order to provide a clear and simple document that provides the necessary information. In our experience, having our final report on file reduces the amount of time needed to satisfy the audit requirements, presents all the materials information in a single well organized document, and minimizes any audit related costs or potential loss of f unding for the owner As documented in the yearly audit results failure to adequately complete or document testing and material certification can result in significant funds being withheld. Our report includes the following items: ■ Copies of Certification Cards for Braun Intertec employees conducting testing on this project. ■ Completed MnDOT Materials Certification Exceptions Summary for items tested by Braun Intertec. ■ Completed Preliminary and Final Grading and Base Report. ■ Completed IA Report ■ All Moisture and Gradation test reports. ■ Concrete mix designs. ■ Weekly concrete reports. ■ Concrete compressive strength results. 0 City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 4 ■ Bituminous mix designs. ■ Bituminous verification test results. ■ Bituminous Contractor's summary sheets. ■ Completed Density Incentive /Disincentive worksheets. ■ Copies of concrete and bituminous plant certifications. Scope of Services Testing services will be performed on an on -call, as- needed basis as requested and scheduled by you or your onsite project personnel. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following services: Soils As specified in the project documents, we have assumed the compaction requirement for the soil portion of this project to follow MnDOT's "Quality Compaction" Specification. The soil testing for this project will consist of the following: ■ Perform moisture content tests at time of compaction on aggregate base materials. Perform gradation tests on aggregate base materials. Assemble the preliminary and final grading and base report along with assembling the random sampling locations report for the aggregate base according to MnDOT Specifications. Concrete The concrete testing for this project will consist of the following: ■ Perform slump, temperature and air content tests on the plastic concrete prior to placement. ■ Cast 4 -inch by 8 -inch cylinders for compressive strength testing. ■ Cast flexural strength beams for concrete pavement placements. ■ Laboratory compressive and flexural strength testing of cylinders and /or beams. ■ Develop the Weekly Concrete Reports for the Project Engineer's review and their submittal to MnDOT's Concrete Office. Bituminous The bituminous testing and monitoring for this project will consist of the following: Collect one verification sample per mix per day of production. Perform quality assurance tests on these samples which include rice specific gravity, asphalt content, extracted aggregate gradation, gyratory density, coarse aggregate angularity, fine aggregate angularity, and thickness and density of pavement cores. Randomly determine and mark pavement core locations. Observe the contractor coring and core testing in accordance with MnDOT's specifications, which include watching quality control personnel weigh the cores at their laboratory. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 5 Reporting and Project Management Test results will be issued for the project as the various tasks are performed. If, at any time, there are failing tests or we observe construction processes which do not appear to be in accordance with the plans and specifications or MnDOT's Schedule of Materials Control, we will notify the engineer's representative and any others that we are directed to notify. MnDOT Independent Assurance (IA) On Federal funded projects, MnDOT requires their IA personnel observe the QC /QA representative performing soil, concrete, and bituminous tests. We will schedule the IA visits as required. Scheduling Assumptions Based on our understanding of the project and the available project information, we assume the work for this phase of the project will proceed according to the following schedules: • Bituminous paving will be completed in two days for this project assuming the contractor paves 300 tons a day. • Fifty -four sets of concrete tests are assumed to complete this project. Thirty sets for curb and gutter, sixteen.sets for sidewalks, .driveways, and pedestrian ramps, and eight sets for concrete. pavement. We assume MnDOT's Metro Inspections Group is performing the Concrete and Bituminous Batch Plant observations and testing for this project. If the pace of construction is different than described above, this proposal should be revised. Cost We will furnish the services described herein for an estimated fee of $24,623. Our estimated costs are based on industry averages for construction production. Depending on the contractor's performance our costs may be reduced or slightly higher than estimated. For the limits of this proposal we have estimated the testing rate and contractor's production based off our experience and have provided what we feel is a fair and realistic budget estimate. A tabulation showing our estimated hourly and /or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services is also attached. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further, clarify the various scope components, and discuss how the scope may be adjusted to meet your projects requirements. i City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 6 Additional Services and Overtime It is difficult to estimate all of the services, and the quantity of each service, that will be required for any project. Our services are also directly controlled by the schedule and performance of others. For these reasons, our actual hourly or unit quantities and associated fees may vary from those reported herein. If the number of hours or units ultimately required exceed those assumed for purposes of this proposal, they will be invoiced at the hourly or unit rates shown in the attached tabulation. If services are ultimately required that have not been identified or described herein, they will be invoiced in accordance with our current Schedule of Charges. Prior to exceeding our estimated fees, we will update you regarding the progress of our work. Fees associated with additional services will be summarized in a Change Order and submitted to you for review and authorization. This proposal was developed with the understanding that the scope of services defined herein will be required and requested during our normal work hours of 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Services that we are asked to provide to meet the project requirements or a contractor's construction schedule outside our normal work hours will be invoiced using an overtime rate factor. The factor for services provided outside our normal work hours or on Saturday will be 1.25 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. The factor for services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be 1.5 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. General Remarks We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. It is provided in duplicate so the original can be retained for your records and the copy can be signed and returned to us. Please return the signed copy in its entirety. The proposed fee is based on the scope of services described and the assumptions that our services will be authorized within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. City of Edina proposal K.44-00594 Fe6ruary 18, 2014 Page 7 We incluide the Braun Intert.ec general qqriclitions, which provide additional terms and are a pqrt of our agreement. To have questions answered or schedule a time to meet and discuss our approach to this project fuetheri please call Andrew Vplqri.u.s at 952.995.2242., Sincerely, BRAUN IN-rERTEC CORPORATION Andrew M. Valerlds Associate Principal- Transportation Project Mah4ger � Ua SL Joshua J. Van Abel, PE Principal- 96riloe Engineer Attachments; Table 1. Estimated Costs General Conditio. n: $-CM-r (9/1/13) Pi Jamie CynPr- City of Edina The proposal Is accepted, and you are authorized to proceed. Authorizer's Signature me (pipase print or Date BRA;# IN,- TERTEC COST ESTIMATE BL-14-00694 France Ave.. Imnts.. SP 120 -.030 -037 City of Edina Service Desc, Construction Materials Testing Chad.Millner 7450 Metro Boulevard Work Location: France Ave., 66 St. to 76 St. Edina; MN 55424 -1394 Edina, MN Estimator: AndroW M VOlerlus Client Reference : trig 13 -5, BA A04 Description: Quantity: Units: Unit Price: Extension: Phase:Construction MaterialsTestirig Start Date: 5/15/2014 End Date: 12/3112014 Task: Soil Observations & Testing Sample pick -up 6.00 Hours 61.00 $66.00 Page 1 of 2 4,60 Trips at 9.50 Hours per Trip Field Moisture Testing 3.00 Hours 69.00 207._00 1.00 Trip at 3.00 Hours per Trip Sieve analysis with 200 wash (ASTM C 136 and C 3.00 Tests 101.00 303.00 117), per sample Topsoil testi (Ig, MN /DOT 3877A (without 2.00 Tests 247.00 494.00 nutrients), per sarppie Asphalt Content (ASTM D 217216307), per sample 1.00 Test 127:00 127.00 TO charge, per trip 4.00 Trips 20.00 80.00 Soil Observations & Testing Total: 1,577.00 Task: Concrete Observations & Testing Concrete Testing 121 j50 Hours 69:00 8,383.50 Concrete Pavement 8.00 Trips at 2.25 Hours per Trip Sidewalks 16.00 Trips at 2.25 Hours per Trip Curb &- Gutter 36,00 Trips at 2.25 Hours per Trlp Concrete Cylinder Pick up 27.00 Hours 61.00 1;647.00 Compressive strength of concrete cylinders 32,00 Tests 21:00 672.00 (ASTM C.39), per specimen Concrete Pavement 8.00 Sets of 4.00 C)Wnders/Set Flexural streggth of beams (ASTM C 78 and 16.00 Each 98,00 1,568.00 ASTM C 293), per specimen Compressive strength of 4 x &' concrete cylinders 138.00 Tests :21.00 4898.00 (ASTM C 39), per unit Sidewalks 1.6.00 Sets of 3.00 Cklinders/$et Curb & Gutter 30,00 Sots of 3.00 Cpinders/Set Trip charge, per trip 81.00 Trips 20.00 1,620.00 Concrete Observations & Testing Total: 16,788.50 Task, Pavement Observations & Testing Split Verification_ Sarnpie with Contractor 4.00 Hour 85,00 340.00 2,00 Trips at 2.00 Hours per Trip Mark and Observe Contractor Coring 4.00 Hour 85.00 340.00 1. 0.0 Trip at 4..00 Hours per Trip Rice specifo gravity (ASTM D 2041), per sample 2.00 Tests 70.00 140.60 Asphalt Content {ASTM D 2172/6307), per sample 2.00 Tests 127.00 254.00 Extracted aggregate gradation (ASTM D 5444), 2.00 Tests 91.00 132.00 per sample Page 1 of 2 Construbtlon Materials Testing Totdl' 24,623.00 Proje 0 TOM: ..4 2 623.00 Page 2 of 2 COST ESTIMATE INTERTEC 01.44,00694 Description: ...... Quantity: .. .. .. .... Units: Unit Pilcp: Extension: Thickness aid density of pavemerit core (ASTM D OcKripss n. 4.00 Tests 43,00 172.00 2726), per specimen Gyrat6ry gravity (AASHTOT11 9), per sample 2.00 Tests 1.5.§,00. 316.00 Pqrqpnt crushed (ASTM D5821), per sample 2.00 Tests 68..00 1.36.00 Fine, Aggregate Angularity (ASTM 01202), per 2.00 Tests 64.00 128.00 sample Trip q4i.ge, per trip -3.00 Trips 20.00 60,00 Pavement 0 sentotiop .p ?,T0$tln0 Total: 2,068.00 Task: Engineering & Project Manageinerit Project Manager 22.00 Hours 118.00 2.596.00 2.00 Hours 145.00 2.90t00 Project Asslsta.ht 0.60 H6 67.00 703;50 Fin . al Report 1.00 Report 60.0.00 600.00 Engineering & Project Management Total: 41149.50 Construbtlon Materials Testing Totdl' 24,623.00 Proje 0 TOM: ..4 2 623.00 Page 2 of 2 General Conditions Construction Material Testing and Special Inspections Section 1: Our Agreement 1.1 Our agreement ( "Agreement') with you consists of these General Conditions and the accompanying written proposal or authorization. This Agreement Is our entire agreement. It supersedes prior agreements. It may be modified only In a writing signed by us, making specific reference to the provision modified. 1.2 The words "you," 'we," "us," and "our" include officers, employees, and subcontractors. 1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or other form to authorize our services, any conflicting or additional terms are not part of our Agreement. Directing us to start work prior to execution of this Agreement constitutes your acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable terms cannot be established, we have the right to withdraw our proposal without liability to you or others, and you will compensate us for services already rendered. Section 2: Our Responsibilities 2.1 We will provide the services specifically described In our Agreement with you. You agree that we are not responsible for services that are not fairly Included in our specific undertaking. Unless otherwise agreed In _ writing, our findings, opinions, and recommendations will be provided to you In writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings, opinions, or recommendations without our written approval. 2.2 In performing our professional services, we will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing In the same locality. If you direct us to deviate from our recommended procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. 2.3 We will reference our field observations and sampling to available reference points, but we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of those points unless we accept that duty in writing. Locations of field observations or sampling described in our report or shown on our sketches are based on Information provided by others or estimates made by our personnel. You agree that such dimensions, depths, or elevations are approximations unless specifically stated otherwise in the report. You accept the Inherent risk that samples or observations may not be representative of things not sampled or seen and, further, that site conditions may change over time. 2.4 Our duties do not include supervising your contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or providing the means and methods of their work, unless we accept such duties In writing. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors to perform In accordance with their undertakings, and the providing of our services will not relieve others of their responsibilities to you or to others. 2.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, job, or site health or safety unless we accept that duty in writing. 2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us, appropriate site safety measures as to work areas to be observed or inspected by us. Our employees are authorized by you to refuse to work under conditions that may be unsafe. 2.7 Estimates of our fees or other project costs will be based on information available to us and on our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should allow a contingency In addition to estimated costs. Section 3: Your Responsibilities 3.1 You will provide us with prior geotechnlcal and other reports, specifications, plans, and Information to which you have access about the site. You agree to provide us with all plans, changes In plans, and new information as to site conditions until we have completed our work. 3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the course of our work some site damage Is normal even when due care Is exercised. We will use reasonable care to minimize damage to the site. We have not included the cost of restoration of normal damage in the estimated charges. 3.3 If we notify you that radiographic or gamma ray equipment or other nuclear testing or measuring device will be used, you will be responsible for the cooperation of your employees and your contractors In observing all radiation safety standards. 3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or dangerous materials at the work site. If we observe or suspect the presence of contaminants not anticipated In our Agreement, we may terminate our work without liability to you or to others, and we will be paid for the services we have provided. 3.5 The time our field personnel spend on the job site depends upon the scheduling of the work we are observing or testing. You agree that any changes In scheduling may result In additional costs and agree to pay for those services at the rates listed in our cost estimate. 3.6 You agree to include us as an indemnified party in your contracts, if any, for work by others on the project, protecting us to the same degree as you are protected. You agree to list us as an Additional Insured under your liability insurance policies and to require subrogation be waived against us and that we will be added as an Additional Insured on all policies of Insurance, Including any policies required of your contractors or subcontractors, covering any construction or development activities to be performed on the project site. Section 4: Reports and Records 4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will provide our report(s) In an electronic format. 4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents and our computer software and data are Instruments of our service to you, and they remain our property but are subject to a license to you for your use In the related project for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not transfer our reports to others or use them for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to Indemnify and hold us harmless from claims, damages, losses, and expenses, Including attorney fees, arising out of such a transfer or use. At your request, we will provide endorsements of our reports or letters of reliance, but only If the recipients agree to be bound by the terms of our Agreement with you and only if we are paid the administrative fee stated in our then current Schedule of Charges. 4.3 Because electronic documents maybe modified Intentionally or inadvertently, you agree that we will not be liable for damages resulting from change In an electronic document occurring after we transmit it to you. 4.4 If you do not pay for our services in full as agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us all of our work that Is In your possession or under your control. 4.5 Electronic data, reports, photographs, samples and other materials provided by you or others may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. GC -CMT Revised 9/1/2013 Pagel of 2 Section 5: Compensation 5.1 You will pay for services as agreed upon or according to our then current Schedule of Charges if there Is no other written agreement as to price. An estimated cost is not a firm figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and other taxes based on your payment of our compensation. Our performance is subject to credit approval and payment of any specified retainer. 5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within 15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of Invoices on receipt. You agree to pay interest on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or at the maximum rate allowed by law. 5.3 If you direct us to invoice another, we will do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless you provide us with that person's written acceptance of all terms of our Agreement and we agree to extend credit to that person and to release you. 5.4 Your obligation to pay for our services under this Agreement is not contingent on your ability to obtain financing, governmental or regulatory agency approval, permits, final adjudication of lawsuit in which we are not Involved, your successful completion of a project, receipt of payment from another, or any other event. No retainage will be withheld. 5.5 If you do not pay us within 60 days of Invoice date, you agree to reimburse our expenses; Including but not limited to attorney fees, staff time, and other costs of collection. 5.6 You agree to compensate us In accordance with our fee schedule if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding related to the project and as to which we are not a party. 5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or if project conditions or the scope or amount of work change, or If changed labor union conditions result in Increased costs, decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the standards or methods change, we will give you timely notice and we will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation. If you and we do not reach agreement on such compensation within 30 days of our written application, we may terminate without liability to you or others. 5.8 If you fall to pay us within 60 days following Invoice date, we may consider the default a total breach of our Agreement and, at our option, terminate our duties without liability to you or to others. 5.9 Inconsideration of our providing Insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right of offset as to fees otherwise due us. Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will Include, but not be limited to, a meeting(s) attended by each party's representative(s) empowered to resolve the dispute. Before either of us commences an action against the other, disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation. 62 Neither of us will be liable for special, Incidental, consequential, or punitive damages, Including but not limited to those arising from delay, loss of use, loss of profits or revenue, loss of financing commitments or fees, or the cost of capital. 6.3 We will not be liable for damages unless suit is commenced within two years of the date of Injury or loss or within two years of the date of substantial completion of our services, whichever is earlier. We will not be liable unless you have notified us of the discovery of the claimed breach of contract, negligent act, or omission within 30 days of the date of discovery and unless you have given us an opportunity to Investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to make a claim against us unless you have provided us at least 30 days prior to the Institution of any legal proceeding against us with a written certificate executed by an appropriately licensed professional specifying and certifying each and every act or omission that you contend constitutes a violation of the standard of care governing our professional services. 6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability for all claims will not exceed the fee paid for our services or $50,000, whichever Is greater. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the date of our Agreement, you provide payment in an amount that will Increase our fees by 10 %, but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This increased fee Is not the purchase of Insurance. 6.5 You agree to indemnify us from all liability to others In excess of the risk allocation stated above and to insure this obligation. 6.6 The prevailing party in any action relating to this Agreement shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, Including reasonable attorney fees, staff time, and expert witness fees. 6.7 The law of the state in which our servicing office Is located will govern all disputes. Each of us waives trial by Jury. No officer or employee acting within the scope of employment shall have Individual liability for his or her acts or omissions, and you agree not to make a claim against Individual employees. Section 7: General Indemnification 7.1 We will indemnify and hold you harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by our negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom we are legally responsible. You will Indemnify and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by your negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom you are legally responsible. 7.2 To the extent It maybe necessary to Indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you and we expressly waive, in favor of the other only, any Immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any worker compensation law. Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 We will provide a certificate of Insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our sole negligence. 8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our Insurers, waive all claims and rights of subrogation for losses arising out of causes of loss covered by our respective Insurance policies. 113 Neither of us will assign nor transfer any Interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any right against the other. Neither of us will assign or otherwise transfer or encumber any proceeds or expected proceeds or compensation from the project or project claims to any third person, whether directly or as collateral or otherwise. 8.4 Our Agreement maybe terminated early only in writing. We will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation in the event of early termination. 8.5 If a provision of this Agreement Is Invalid or Illegal, all other provisions shall remain In full force and effect. GC -CMT Revised 9/1/2013 Page 2 of 2 VU f' Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, First of all, thank you, Mayor Hovland, for attending the community meeting at Braemar. Our neighborhood residents appreciate your respect and openness to our strong concerns. Many of us feel there has been a rush to judgment and a lack of transparency in regard to the Fred Richards issue and are grateful for your responsiveness. 1 personally am troubled by the impression that more heed is paid to developers than is paid to long -term residents who have been supporting the city with their hard -eamed tax dollars for decades. We chose to live here because of the quality of life including excellent schools, good parks and easy access to the urban core without the density and bustle of same. 1 feel this quality is being compromised. John Valliere, Business then General Manager of Braemar Golf Course for over 40 years of its near 50 -year existence, kindly provided information and insight into the courses' development over the years. His document was, in his words, written to "enlighten residents and inform present decision makers of the remarkable improvements that were made with course revenues and without tax funding ...[but with] the city council, park board and staff... instrumental in the decision making process" (underlining my own). I feel his comments bear additional weight in light of his experience as past - president of the Minnesota Golf Association and 20 years as Committeeman for the United States Golf Association. Any error of fads I attribute to my own misinterpretation. From his review, 1 found certain points of special interest: 1) 'The Richards course was paid for by the golfers at Braemar.° In fact, Braemar has a history of fiscal integrity and cooperation. Of the original land costs of $500,000 for the Braemar Golf Course and Arena, the golf course half was paid for by the course while the $250,000 for the Ice Arena was forgiven by the City Council and, for a period, profits of $75,000 from the golf dome were transferred to the Arena. As Braemar play declined, bond costs were growing, but a request by Mr.Valliere to rebond while bond rates were favorable was denied and "[I]iquor ... monies were transferred _in to help bridge until the bonds were retired in 2013. It was understood that these funds should be repaid when revenues rebounded." 2) °Do not forget the Richards course is now paid for and greens fees are approaching a_point where it may become a profit center.' What are the costs to taxpayers of converting Fred Richards to a park or other green space? Where would the revenue come from to maintain it in its new form? 3) "Next you have the km to the community of a beginner /seniors course that serves both Edina and Richfield This is important in two ways, First, as resident Mike Welbaum pointed out to city and park board leaders in his letter of February 0, the "'Proposed Changes' claim that'no golfers will be displaced' is unsupported and naive ... at best. New, young. casual and senior -golfers have little interest in hilly rand challen -gin -gl terrain ... It is unlikely that all of these clients will ... [transfer] to Braemar as assumed.' Secondly, the continuance of Fred Richards, by allowing young and casual golfers to gain confidence and skills, will provide a feeder system for the ongoing success of Braemar. 4) Braemar has just °experienced a perfect stomp of unending rain, a golf dome burning down, and fairways that came out of winter essentially dead" resulting in an atypical reduction in revenue. As we all know, figures can be massaged to support different ends. To make major changes based on the most recent figures is unwise. The return of the dome in addition to increased revenues from the proposed improvements to the already - popular driving range provide a much different picture. 5) `With some dedicated marketing, I believe the revenues could be grown considerably. This should be approached with marketing people who KNOW GOLF. The same marketing efforts could apply at Braemar [as well as Fred Richards]." In sum, Fred Richards is a community resource that is paid for and has a revenue stream in place that is dose to becoming a profit center. In Mr. Valliere's informed opinion, the revenues could grow considerably with experienced golf marketing. Any changes to the Richards space and ongoing maintenance thereof will have their own costs. Who will pay for them? Fred Richards was paid for by revenue from Braemar golfers and can in burn be a feeder system that contributes to Braemar's long -term success. Braemar as a whole is a vital part of the community. It has contributed excess revenues to other city interests in the past while receiving help in turn. Richards is a special resource for young and old alike. It is a good neighbor for those of us who live nearby, an amenity that influenced our reasons for buying here. I am sure there are many in Edina like my husband and myself who have never had a child in the Edina Schools, who have never set foot on the ice at Braemar arena or used the over- expanding athletic fields and facilities. Yet we have supported them through our votes and our tax dollars because we believe they contribute to the overall quality of Ifie here. We would appreciate it if you would respect our contributions and our opinions about what we think makes our community special. Sincerely, Susan Soule West Shore Drive Edina, MN Edina Golf Operations Response to current proposal: Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations i 3/4/2014 •1 I Summary • Closing Fred Richards does not address current issues and creates a gap for Edina golfers • Other options are more attractive financially and protect the development of youth and accessibility for all ages • Investments in golf enterprise are necessary, but this can be done with Fred Richards open • More time and options are needed to develop a Master Plan and make the best long -term decision for Edina golf • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/201402 Current 6 -Step Strategy: Lacks Vision 1. Close Fred Richards 2. Adjust Rates 3. Improve Marketing 4. Improve driving range /convert to par 3 Construction costs $(1,2041900) Lost revenue during construction $(395,900) [Revenue increase after construction $1,0081300 5. Outsource grill 6. Reduce staff Total Savings • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations $734,000 $2,227,300 $(919,400) $(592,.500) $522,200 $362,800 $2,334,000 3/4/2014.3 Fred Richards is not the problem $500,000 $(500,000) $(11000,000) $(1,5001000) $(2,000,000) $(2,500,000) $(31000,000) $(31500,000) ■ Fred Richards ■ Ttl Golf Operation • Fred Richards results include $50,000 annual expense allocation suggested from city staff (30% increase of current direct expense) • Forward looking forecast represents city staff baseline scenario (if we do nothing) • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/201404 Option le, Close Fred Richards • Saves $734,000 over the next 6 years: Fred revenue lost (net Braemar Exec transfers) $ (878 200) Fred operating expense savings (w/ $50K allocation) $ 1,432,200 Fred equipment savings ($30K per year) $ 1801000 • Timing is inefficient, why not wait until 2015 for a decision? o Does not generate any funds for the driving range expansion o Both executive courses would be closed due to the range /par 3 renovation • Eliminates an executive style course within Edina • Excludes additional cash to repurpose existing Fred course (Park Board confirmed no costs were included to repurpose FR and on -going maintenance) Golf Operations Savings $ 2,334,400 Cost to repurpose park $ (1,000,000) Cost to maintain park ($50K per year) $ (300,000) Total impact to the City $ 1,034,400 • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/2014 05 Delay Fred Richards Closure • Delaying decision generates savings and provides time for Master Plan Reinstate Fred Richards 2015 lost revenue $ 168,700 Reinstate Fred Richards 2015 expenses $ (228,000) 50% recovery of lost revenue during Braemar course construction $ 71,300 Total benefit 1 $ 12,000 • Timing is inefficient, why not wait until 2015 for a decision? o Continue to play within Edina o Cash savings are not generated prior to debt offering o All options tonight show savings sufficient to support a credit facility o Players may not come back if they play somewhere else for a year o Current assumption is the players come back and rounds increase 18% due to marketing • Park Board staff confirmed this option was not explored • Edina golf study 3/4/2014 06 Option 2.@ Maintain Existing Facilities • Generates $646,000 over the next 6 years: Fred rate increase $ 252,900 Increased rounds thru mktg & expansion of leagues $ 3211800 Recovery of lost revenue during course construction $ 71,300 • Ensures an executive style course remains in Edina and creates a Par 3 "pitch and putt" that could bring in new users Par 3 "Pitch & Putt Executive Course 18 Hole / 9 Hole Cluny • Entertainment Recreational Accomplished • Eliminates additional cash need to repurpose the existing Fred course into a park • 6 -step impact w/ capital avoidance = $2,089,200 (2X Option 1) • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/201407 Option 3e, Keep Fred, Close Braemar Exec • Saves $522,200 over the next 6 years: Braemar Exec revenue lost (net Fred transfers) $ (821,200) Braemar Exec operating expense savings $ 1,163,400 Braemar Exec equipment savings ($30K per year) $ 180,000 • Fred course ideal for executive course players o Better landscape and easier to maintain o Fred Richards course = relaxed, low pressure recreational environment o Breamar environment = competitive / accomplished players o +28,676 more rounds played in last 10 years at Fred vs. Braemar Exec • Provides additional space for driving range /practice facility • Significantly reduces future investment (Par 3, irrigation system) • 6 -step impact w/ capital avoidance = $2,522,600 (2.5X Option 1) • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/2014.8 Our Ask • Vote to TABLE staff's recommendation to close Fred to allow for further study before making an unreasonably quick decision on a long -time treasured community asset • Vote to APPROVE staff's recommended improvements to Braemar w/ the exception of converting Braemar Exec to Par 3 • Direct staff to work w/ appropriate resources and residents to produce a Master Plan for the future of Edina Golf Operations o There are options that should be explored that better service Edina golf and are more fiscally responsible than current plan • Maximizing the possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3/4/2014 •9 I To: Mayor and Council From: Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Date: March 4, 2014 0 T " roA, • 1w 5 5 Agenda Item 4% VIII.B. Action ❑ Discussion M Information ❑ Subject: Edina Community Health Board seat on the State Community Health Services Advisory Committee. Action Requested: Determine appropriate representative to serve as the City of Edina voting member on the State Community Health Services Advisory Committee. Information / Background: The City of Edina is one of only four cities (Bloomington, Richfield, and Minneapolis) designated as a community health board (CHB) according to Minnesota Statute 145A. Minnesota's remaining community health boards are made up of a county, or group of counties, acting as a single CHB. The State Community Health Services Advisory Committee (SCHSAC) is an advisory group made up of one representative from each of the 52 community health boards in Minnesota. SCHSAC (pronounced 'shack') members attend quarterly meetings with the Minnesota Commissioner of Health to discuss and vote on a wide range of public health issues common throughout the state. The majority of SCHSAC voting members are elected officials, such as county commissioners or city council members, with a staff person serving as an alternate. Currently, the City of Bloomington designates a council person as a representative, while the City of Richfield designates a member of the Richfield Advisory Board of Health. In recent years, the Edina Community Health Services Administrator has been designated as the City's representative. The purpose of this report is to solicit either participation in SCHSAC from a Council Member, or guidance regarding who would be an appropriate representative from the Edina Community Health Board. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St • Edina, MN 55424 n Office of Performance Improvement PO Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164 -0975 651- 201 -3880 The JState Community Health Services Advisory Committee (SCHSAC) WHAT IS SCHSAC? In Minnesota, public health responsibilities are shared between state and local governments. To function effectively, strong communication and coordination is needed between the Minnesota Department of Health and local governments, as well as with federal government entities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The SCHSAC has been a unique aspect of Minnesota's state and local public health partnership since 1976. It is a statutorily defined advisory group, comprised of one representative from each of Minnesota's 52 community health boards. About two- thirds of the members are local elected officials, and about one -third of members are local public health directors and administrators. The SCHSAC has regular, face -to -face meetings with the health commissioner to discuss public health issues of mutual interest. PURPOSE SCHSAC is advisory to the health commissioner and provides guidance on the development, maintenance, financing and evaluation of community health services. Each year, through work groups, regular communications, and an annual conference — and because of the commitment of state and local public health professionals and local elected officials — the SCHSAC identifies, develops, and responds to critical public health issues. The influence of this committee is felt in every Minnesota community, as the recommendations of the SCHSAC are not only submitted to the commissioner of health, but are also adopted by community health boards, implemented statewide through guidelines, and used as the basis for developing policy. FACTORS LEADING TO SUCCESS The SCHSAC plays a key role in supporting a strong and effective public health partnership between state and local governments. ■ The SCHSAC is a useful and effective problem - solving and policy - development group. ■ It serves as a means for state and local government to identify and discuss shared goals to protect, maintain and improve the health of the public statewide, as well as develop agreed - upon methods to achieve those goals. ■ It contributes to improved state -local communication, informed policy development, positive state -local relationships, and strong support for public health among local elected officials. ■ The effectiveness of the SCHSAC is due to the commitment and active participation of the health commissioner and other leaders in the work of the SCHSAC, a governing statute and process for continuity, regular updates on issues and resources, active participation of local elected officials, and focused study on key issues for statewide improvement. 4/23/12 SCHSAC Factsheet ti Fill W r.= 9MM, STATE COMMUNITY HEALTH SER VICES AD VISORY COMMITTEE Friday, March 7, 2014 10:00 AM — 2:30 PM Hampton Inn — Shoreview 1000 Gramsie Road, Shoreview, Minnesota 55126 Hotel Phone: 1- 651- 482 -0402 Grand Ballroom Preliminary Agenda Wireless Internet Instructions: Preferred network: ATTWi, Second option: HHonors; Promotion code: cateringl3 I. CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS .............................. ..........................Larry Kittelson, Chair Horizon CHB II. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF MARCH 7, 2014 AGENDA * .............. ..........................Larry Kittelson III. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6, 2013 MTG. SUMMARY* ..................Larry Kittelson IV. CHAIR'S REMARKS ................................................ ............................... ..........................Larry Kittelson V. COMMISSIONER'S REMARKS AND DISCUSSION .........................Edward P. Ehlinger, MD, MSPH Commissioner of Health, MDH VI. ADVANCING HEALTH EQUITY: What Creates Health? ................ .......................Jeannette Raymond Dorothy Bliss Office of Performance Improvement, MDH &.Lunch -6 VII. SCHSAC 2014 WORK PLAN AND 2013 ANNUAL REPORT ................ ............................... Deb Burns Office of Performance Improvement, MDH VIII. MDH DIRECTOR UPDATES ........... ...... ...................... Maggie Diebel Community and Family Health Kris Ehresmann Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Prevention and Control Darcy Miner Compliance Monitoring Julie Myhre Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives Diane Rydrych Health Policy IX. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Executive Committee ............................................ ............................... ..........................Larry Kittelson B. General Reports— written reports only .................. .................... ............ ..........................Larry Kittelson C. Performance Improvement Steering Committee ................ ............................... Allie Friedrichs, Chair Meeker- McLeod - Sibley CHB D. Conference Planning Workgroup ................ .......... ...................... ...................:.....Karen Ahmann, Chair Polk- Norman- Mahnomen CHB E. Public Health Emergency Preparedness ........................... ............................... Susan Morris, CO- Cliair Isanti -Mille Lacs CHB Pete Giesen, Co -Chair Olmsted CHB X. ADJOURN :.......:......................................................... ............................... ..........................Larry Kittelson *Materials included in the pre- meeting email Three Simple Rules of the State -Local Public Health Partnership 1. Seek First to Understand 2. Make Expectations Explicit 3. Think about the Part and the Whole If you have any special requests, please call Liz Arita at (651) 201 -3890. rpi .AI, State Community Health Services Advisory Committee December 6, 2013 Draft Summary Members /Alternates Present: Mower Blue Earth Lisa Kocer Mark Piepho Anoka North Country Robert Meyer (alt) Laurel Hoff (alt) Helene Kahlstorf Carlton- Cook - Lake -St. Louis Bloomington Olmsted Peter Wash Karen Nordstrom Sheila Kiscaden Julie Myhre (alt) Karen Zeleznak (alt) Pete Giesen (alt) Clay - Wilkin Brown - Nicollet Otter Tail Neal Folstad Jim Berg Douglas Huebsch Grant Weyland (alt) Karen Moritz (alt) Diane Thorson (alt) Cottonwood - Jackson Carver Polk- Norman- Mahnomen Rosemary Schultz Marcee Shaughnessy Karen Ahmann Pat Stewart (alt) Cass Jamie Richter (alt) Ramsey (St. Paul) Marina McManus (alt) Countryside Chisago Rice Jeanne Krueger Deb Schuhmacher Debra Purfeerst Elizabeth Auch (alt) Dakota Richfield Crow Wing Bonnie Brueshoff (alt) Rose Jost Rachel Reabe- Nystrom Scott Paul Thiede (alt) .Dodge - Steele Merrilee Brown (alt) Edina Peggy Espey (alt) Sherburne Cheryl Engelman Faribault- Martin Ewald Petersen Fill Houston Bill Groskreutz, Jr. SWHHS Thomas Kaase Thom Freeborn Marvin Tinklenberg (alt) Justin Zmyewski (alt) Susan Yost (alt) Wabasha Goodhue Hennepin . Judy Barton Ted Seifert Susan Palchick (alt) Washington Lowell Johnson Nina Arneson (alt) Horizon Larry Kittelson Winona Kandiyohi- Renville . Marcia Ward Harlan Madsen Isanti -Mille Lacs Wright LaMont Jacobson (alt) Susan Morris Carol Schefers (alt) Nobles Kanabec -Pine Members Not Present: Matthew Widboom Wendy Thompson Terri Janssen (alt) LeSueur- Waseca Aitkin- Itasca - Koochiching Quin Amy Roggenbuck Laurie Westerlund (alt) Rachel Green Meeker - McLeod- Sibley Becker Betty Younggren (alt) Joy Cohrs Don Skarie Stearns Alethea Freidrichs (alt) Ronda Stock (alt) rauendienst (alt) Minneapolis Benton Watonwan Becky McIntosh (alt) Warren Peschl Kathleen Svalland Morrison- Todd - Wadena Diana Graning (alt) Richard Collins (alt) Bonnie Paulsen (alt) SCHSAC December 6, 2013 Page 1 of 7 Others in Attendance: Jeanne Ayers; Linda Bauck -Todd, Becky Buhler, Deb Burns, Amanda Diehl, Ed Ehlinger, Melissa Finnegan, Lee Ho, Tom Hogan, Jim Koppel, Aggie Leitheiser, Peggy Malinowski, Mary Manning, Kathy Minkler, Manny . - Munson - Regala, Abbie Mosher, Britta Orr, Dave Orren, Sarah Reese, Mike Schoinmer, Janelle Schroeder, Allison Thrash, Rochelle Westlund CALL TO ORDER AND INTRODUCTIONS Chair Bill Groskreutz, Faribault -Martin CHB; called the meeting to order and asked for introductions. He welcomed the guests in attendance. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DECEMBER 6,2013 AGENDA Ewald= Petersen, Sherburne CHB, made a motion to approve the. agenda for the December 6`" meeting. Marcia Ward, Winona CHB, seconded the motion. The chair called for the vote and the motion was approved. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, MEETING SUMMARY Larry Kittelson, Horizon CHB, made a motion to approve the summary for the September SCHSAC meeting. Karen Ahmann, Polk - Norman - Mahnomen CHB, seconded the motion. The chair called for the vote and the motion was approved. CHAIR'S REMARKS SCHSAC Chair Bill Groskreutz thanked SCHSAC members for the opportunity to serve as chair for the past year. He also thanked Commissioner Ehlinger and MDH staff. He wished everyone happy times during the, holiday season and safe travels. He also noted the upcoming retirements of Cheryl Schneider, Public Health Director Todd County and past CHS Administrator for Morrison - Todd - Wadena CHB; Sue Erzar, Public Health Director, Itasca County; and Karen Zeleznak, CHS Administrator and Public Health Director, Bloomington CHB. He noted that it was the last SCHSAC meeting for past chair Karen Nordstrom; Bloomington CHB'. Retiring City Council Member Karen Nordstrom briefly addressed. SCHSAC, noting that she will miss this group of dedicated people and was pleased to have been a part of SCHSAC for many years. Karen Zeleznak also spoke to those in attendance. She acknowledged the public health leadership provided by SCHSAC and its participants, especially the elected local officials. Lastly, Commissioner Groskreutz reminded everyone to complete the SCHSAC Customer Satisfaction Survey in their packets. The survey will be conducted annually to ensure continuous improvement. COMMITTEE REPORTS On behalf of Nominating and Awards Workgroup Chair Bev Bales, Horizon CHB, who was unable to attend the meeting, Chair Bill Groskreutz led members through the process to select the 2014 Chair - Elect/2015 Chair. County Commissioner Karen Ahmann, Polk- Norman - Mahnomen CHB, was listed on the ballot. After asking three times for any other nominations from the floor and getting none, Chair Groskreutz asked Karen Ahmann to address SCHSAC members. She told them about her 15 years as a county commissioner and her roles as a business owner, public health advocate, and hospital board SCHSAC December 6, 2013 Page;2 of 7 member in her community. She wants to help public health "blow its own horn" more to let others know of its value. Before moving on, Bill noted that there was a Call for Volunteers for both the Nominating and Awards Workgroup and the Conference Planning Workgroup in the meeting materials. Staff collected the ballots for tallying. COMMISSIONER'S REMARKS AND DISCUSSION Commissioner Ed Ehlinger, Minnesota Department of Health, updated SCHSAC on his participation at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) meeting in North Carolina that ended the day before. He noted that Assistant Commissioner Ellen Benavides is leaving MDH to go back to her consulting and documentarian work. The Compliance Monitoring Division will temporarily report to Assistant Commissioner Aggie Leitheiser. The Health Policy Division will temporarily report to Deputy Commissioner Jim Koppel. Proposed work with the Department of Human Services on mental health issues is currently on hold. Assistant Commissioner Jeanne Ayers announced that Julie Myhre, current CHS Administrator for Carlton- Cook - Lake -St. Louis CHB, will be joining MDH in January as the new director of the Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives. Interim director Michelle Larson was lauded for her leadership during the roll -out of SHIP 3.0. He also noted that legislative policy director Matthew Collie left MDH. He introduced Melissa Finnegan, legislative liaison for MDH. The Minnesota Department of Health recently had its two -day site visit from the Public Health Accreditation Board as part of its application for national accreditation. MDH expects to hear the results in February or March of 2014. Commissioner Ehlinger said that the process of preparing and applying for accreditation has been good for the department. He noted there were some things MDH wasn't doing to meet the standards, but is doing now. He hopes to publicize accreditation during Public Health Week in April. Bonnie Brueshoff, Dakota CHB, commented that MDH is leading the way for local public health in demonstrating the value of accreditation. He thanked Deb Burns and LuAnne McNichols from the Office of Performance Improvement for heading up MDH's process and noted that OPI staff is available to assist local agencies prepare for accreditation. He also thanked local public health partners for participating in the community partners meeting during the site visit. Commissioner Ehlinger noted some of the significant public health achievements that occurred this year. They included: raising the Tobacco Tax; conversations from Pitch the Commissioner informing the Governor's silica sand policy; childhood obesity decreasing; SHIP3.0. He noted that he is using the United Health Foundation's state health rankings to measure his outcomes as commissioner. Learn more about the rankings at http://w,,vw.americashealthrankings.org/Rankings. Manny Munson - Regala provided an update on MNsure, the state's health insurance exchange. The revised deadline for January 1St coverage is December 23`d. Mr. Munson - Regala noted that people applying for MinnesotaCare and Medicare need to apply before the end of the year, but have more time to make their January payment. There was a question about the role of counties in collecting these payments. MDH staff verified that the counties are not collecting any premiums for DHS. Visit the MNsure website at http: / /www.mnsure.ora /. Assistant Commissioner Aggie Leitheiser provided information about MDH's involvement in the environmental investigation of the General Mills site in the Como Neighborhood of Minneapolis. The SCHSAC December 6, 2013 Page 3 of 7 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is leading the effort looking for underground vapors that may be entering homes and buildings: More information, including maps, can be found on the PCA website, http: / /www.pea.state.mn.us /i ndex.php/ about- mpca/mpca- news /featured- stories /draft- se -com o- vapor- intrusion.html. Abigail Mosher, MDH's Chief Financial Officer, spoke about the recently released state budget forecast that projects a`surplus. Governor Dayton will wait for the February budget forecast before proposing any legislative funding changes. Ms. Mosher also discussed the federal budget. She noted that MDH will share what it learns from the federal government with its local partners. Jim Koppel, Deputy Commissioner, addressed SCHSAC about the upcoming "unsession" at the state capitol. MDH is waiting to hear from the Governor's Office about its several legislative proposals. Revisions to the Local Public Health Act, drafted by a SCHSAC workgroup, will be a major piece of MDH's legislative agenda, and is moving forward pending final approval. The first draft has been received from the Revisor's Office. Other topics of interest include e- cigarettes, the.public health impact of raising the minimum wage, and laws related to the storage of testing materials and results for the newborn screening program He noted that MDH will be developing talking points to share with local public health as needed. Commissioner Ehlinger referenced a report by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that looked at newborn screening processes around the country. Minnesota has high quality, rapid reporting, but is always looking to improve if people are aware of issues to address. A delay in testing and receiving results can be devastating for babies and their families. He also shared that MDH is creating a Center for Health Equity to lead a department -wide effort to bring a health equity lens and intention to MDH's existing efforts and partnerships. The Center for Health Equity will be composed of several current work units including the Office of Minority and Multicultural Health, the Center for Health Statistics and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. In addition, because external partners will be critical to MDH's efforts, the Center will create a more explicit cultural liaison function with communities experiencing health disparities. Staffing and financial details are still under development. Commissioner Ehlinger commented on additional activities related to public health including: the Environmental Quality Board is looking at silica sand guidelines for air and water quality; the state's Olmstead Plan to provide better services to people with disabilities will be out soon and will likely have implications for local public health; and the statewide plan to end homelessness. Tom Hogan, new director of MDH Environmental Health Division, addressed a question about how state agencies are working together on issues related to surface and ground water. Tom noted that many in MDH are connected to the work of other agencies on this topic. Efforts are focused on collecting data to identify underground water resources. MDH HEALTH EQUITY REPORT: ADVANCING HEALTH EQUITY Next Commissioner Ehlinger and Assistant Commissioner Jeanne Ayers introduced the department's efforts around health equity. Jeannette Raymond, Office of Performance Improvement, provided background information and asked those in attendance to form small groups for discussion. SCHSAC's feedback was documented, by note- takers and will be used to inform the legislative report due in February. More information is available'at http: / /www.health.state.mn.us /divs /chs/healthequitv / . SCHSAC .'December 6, 2013 Page 4 of:7 ANNOUNCEMENT OF 2014 CHAIR- ELECT /2015 CHAIR AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chair Bill Groskreutz announced that,Mahnomen County Commissioner Karen Ahmann, representing Polk - Norman - Mahnomen CHB, was elected as the 2014 Chair- Elect/2015 Chair. He directed members and alternates to caucus by region to select representative members and alternates to the SCHSAC Executive Committee. After lunch, Lowell Johnson, Washington CHB, entertained the.group with his original composition of "'Twas a Public Health, Christmas." After staff confirms the appointments, the 11 listing for the 2014 Executive Committee will be posted to the SCHSAC website and shared with members. PASSING OF THE GAVEL Commissioner Ehlinger thanked Faribault County Commissioner Bill Groskreutz, (representing Faribault- Martin CHB), for his work as the 2013 SCHSAC Chair. He presented Commissioner Groskreutz with a plaque. Commissioner Ehlinger then. welcomed the 2014 SCHSAC Chair, Pope County Commissioner Larry Kittelson, (representing Horizon CHB). Commissioner Kittelson was presented with his SCHSAC gavel. MDH DIRECTOR UPDATES Mary Manning, Director, of the Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Division, spoke to SCHSAC about the Safe Harbor Minnesota initiative. Safe Harbor Minnesota is a statewide effort to provide shelter and services for Minnesota's sexually exploited youth and is the first most significant state investment in the country to end child sex trafficking. These youth will be treated as victims, not criminals, effective August 2014. Requests for proposals are due by February 3, 2014, for regional navigators. Navigators will serve as regional experts to coordinate victim- centered resources and services for sexually exploited youth and serve as a central resource for community members; service providers, law enforcement and youth themselves. More information is available at http: / /www.health.state.inn.us /injury /topic /safeharbor /. Mary addressed a question about why the navigators will be hired through MDH instead of DHS. She and Jim Koppel commented that advocates requested MDH's involvement to strengthen the emphasis on prevention and that it was a part of the legislation. Newly appointed Director Tom Hogan, Environmental Health Division, introduced himself to SCHSAC, provided a broad overview of environmental health, and spoke about the meetings with the Local Public Health Association to improve relationships around food, pools and lodging issues. A continuous improvement board, with SCHSAC representation, will be created with assistance from the Office of Performance Improvement to initially focus on these issues. Ultimately,.the board will focus on broader issues related to environmental health. Diane Rydrych, Health Policy, presented.information about the State Innovation Model (SIM) Grant: She discussed the vision driving the mork: every patient receives coordinated, patient- centered primary care; providers are held accountable for the care provided; financial incentives reward providers for keeping patients healthy and improving quality of care; and provider organizations effectively and sustainably partner with community organizations, engage consumers; and take responsibility for population health.. Project managers have been hired and there are two'task forces to address continuum of accountable care, evaluation, community engagement, and.Accountable Communities for�Health.. DHS and the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) recently launched a new SIM Minnesota website at mn.gov /sim. Sign up to receive updates via e- newsletter. SCHSAC Page 5 of 7 COMMITTEE REPORTS Executive Committee SCHSAC Chair Bill Groskreutz. noted that the Executive Committee met prior to the meeting to approve. the agenda, approve the charge to create a SCHSAC Strategic Plan for the next five year, and discussed a draft of the 2014 SCHSAC work plan. He reminded members to review the General Reports, distributed via email to get updates on committee with SCHSAC representation. Local Public Health Act Revisions Workgroup Co -chair Pete Giesen, Olmsted CHB, shared that the first draft of the revised Local Public Health Act was received from the Legislative Revisor's Office. Once a more cohesive and complete draft of the bill language is ready it will be shared with the LPH Act workgroup co- chairs (Pete Giesen and Commissioner Susan Morris) as well as with a representative from AMC and one for LPHA. SCHSAC will continue to receive updates as the legislative process continues. Performance Improvement Steering Committee Chair Allie Friedrichs, Meeker - McLeod - Sibley CHB, spoke about the progress that has been made on the 2010 recommendations from the Performance Improvement and Accreditation Workgroup. She.used the four -part diagram of the performance management system to show the progress that has been made from measurement to monitoring and communicating. The Performance Improvement Steering Committee now has baseline data to use to determine quality improvement projects for the system. She gave kudos to MDH because while MDH was preparing itself for accreditation, it was helping local public health to meet the standards. Public Health Emergency Preparedness Oversight Group Co -chair Pete Giesen, Olmsted CHB, updated SCHSAC on the work of the PHEP Oversight Group. The group is continuing to explore options for future funding distribution and will use the principles, approved by SCHSAC at the September meeting, to guide their decisions. He noted that MDH is streamlining reporting for local public health by consolidating data collection forms. The new form will be available soon. Building Health Information Exchange Capacity Workgroup . Co -chair Diane Thorson, Otter Tail CHB, presented the accomplishments and final recommendations of the Building Health Information Exchange Capacity Workgroup. She reminded SCHSAC members that HIE is an important investment, just like snow plows for Minnesota winters. The group recommends acting to further :advance e- health in Minnesota's local public health community to achieve the vision of enhancing public health outcomes through secure, standardized exchange of data between the Minnesota Department of Health, Local Public Health (LPH), and community partners. The group recommended establishing an on -going statewide public health e- health workgroup to provide guidance, governance, coordination, and leadership for MDH/LPH departments; utilizing common information requirements and standards in accordance with the Standards and Interoperability Framework from the Office of the National Coordinator (ONQ and ensuring informatics -savvy organization and workforce. Helene Kahlstorf, North Country CHB, made the motion to approve the recommendations. Doug Huebsch, Otter Tail CHB, seconded the motion. Motion approved. SCHSAC . December 6, 2013 Page 6 of 7 Conference Planning Workgroup Chair Larry Kittelson thanked the SCHSAC Conference Planning Workgroup for their work on the 2013 conference, which was held September 25 -27`h in Brainerd. He asked for volunteers for the 2014 workgroup. The Community Health Conference will be held September 17 -19, 2014. Data Visualization to Inform Public Health Action, Protect Vulnerable Populations Chuck Stroebel, MDH Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Division, and Kelly Muellman, MDH Environmental Health Division, presented to SCHSAC. Chuck shared information about access to public health information through the data portal, MN .Public Health Data Access. The portal provides access to a variety of health and environmental information in one place, with graphs and charts, interactive maps, and custom data queries. Kelly addressed progress on the recommendations of the SCHSAC Climate Adaptation Workgroup and showed how data from the portal can be used. She showed maps of heat events and vulnerable populations, and then demonstrated how the creation of composite maps can be useful for assessment and planning. Visit the Climate and Health website at http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/climatechange/. ADJOURN Rochelle Westlund, the new Health and Human Services Policy Director for the Association of Minnesota Counties was introduced. Then Larry Kittelson, 2014 SCHSAC Chair, thanked everyone for their participation and adjourned the meeting. SCHSAC December 6, 2013 Page 7 of 7 4 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Correspondence 7 Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. �91NA, mil\ O v � �o • ,y��nRi'OAP�F'O • IPPP Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action Discussion ❑ Information ❑ City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin From: Norman Cohen <norman7109 @comcast.net> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 10:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: City council meeting proposals Dear Edina City Council members, I have been a resident of Edina since 1994 and have enjoyed playing golf at all of Edina's fine public golf courses. I look forward to playing more golf there in the future. I understand that the city is considering a proposal that would involve layoffs of some city employees connected to golf. While I understand the need to stay within budget and resources, the impact it will have on the residents through a decline in customer service will be quite significant. Customer service is one of the areas that Edina is trying to improve. So in this tension between priorities, customer service and budget, I hope the city council will lean toward preserving customer service and find other ways to trim the budget and exercise fiscal responsibility. Many of the moves that are being considered make sense. Closing the Fred Richards course at the end of the 2014 season would eliminate duplication. There is probably not enough business to warrant two Executive courses. The expansion of the driving range and teaching facility by using part of the Executive Course at Braemar and changing that into a par 3 would be a practical and cost saving move as well. It would also offer more service to the community. That expansion seems long overdue. The idea of hiring an outside customer service consultant might at first glance be tempting but that could be done in house. Jeff Homberger has been there for over two decades and can greet most people by name, lie is affable and well liked. He also.has such a deep knowledge of every aspect of the golf course and its activities. Fle is a liaison for the pro shop and outside staff. I know Jeff and can vouch for his integrity. honesty, extremely responsible work ethic, and fine character. To eliminate Jeffs position seems to me to be the last thing the city should even consider. It appears that you are already short staffed. To put his workload on the remaining staff members would add stress and pressure that work against good customer service. Communication during the transition will probably be more difficult and customer service is likely to decline rather than improve. Jeff Homberger, because of his loyalty and commitment would be difficult to. replace and his absence would hurt the quality of the experience at Braemar. Sincerely, 7109 Gleason Rd. Edina, Minnesota 55439 612- 281 -9666 norma0109(2(comcast.net Heather Branigin From: Kathryn Jarvinen <kathyja @hbc.i.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 11:08 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Kathy Jarvinen Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Dear City Council: I am writing to ask you to provide more information as to why it is necessary for you to suggest closing Fred Richards Golf Course? It seems that this vote you are pursuing is being done without providing a more open and public discussion. I suggest you have a public hearing on this subject. I oppose closing /changing The FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Thank you. Kathryn Jarvinen 4351 Parklawn Avenue Edina,.MN 55435 1 Heather Branigin From: schwa p pac hs @co mcast. riet Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 11:18 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Carla Schwappach Subject: FredRichards Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there.is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Heather Branigin From: Dana Olsen <dolsen123 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 201411:28 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please vote NO to closing Fred Richards Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards.golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Dana Olsen dolsen12UDgmail.com 1 i Heather Branigin From: Frazell, Kevin <KFrazell @lmc.org> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 12:16 PM To: pattyacomb @yahoo.com; kj.anderson3311 @gmail.com; gbarone @eminnetonka.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; mbilderback @rochestermn.gov; Brede, Ardell; Mary Brindle (Comcast); timbusse @hotmail.com; ashley .fairbanks @minneapolismn.gov; jconsidine @city.mankato.mn.us; Annie Coyle; mayor @ci.rosemou nt. mn.us; jane.eastwood @ci:stpaul.mn.us; Frazell, Kevin; edwinagarcia44 @gmail.com; Goettel, Debbie; smarschall @cityofapplevalley.org; smarschall @ci.apple - valley.mn.us; jimhamilton @pacemn,com; patharrisl @comcast.net; Edina Mail; thowe@coonrapidsmn.gov; eiago @cityofwsp.org; dave .jacobsen @newbrightommn.gov, andrew .johnson @minneapolismn,gov; Johnson, Marvin; pjj37 @comcast.net; Johnson, Shaunna; mitchell.kilian @mspmac.org; dklint @coonrapidsmn.gov; jkoch @coonrapidsmn.gov; jeanette .clawson @ci.owatonna.mn.us; Jeff rey.Lunde @brooklynpark.org; sand rameans@charter.net; Miller, Jim; . suzie .nakasian @ci.northfield.mn.us; Scott Neal ;jol.eson @BloomingtonMN.gov; john.quincy @minneapolismn.gov, chuckrepke @aol.com; michael.schultz @bhsheafth.org; tom.smith @cistpaul.mn.us; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; staver.randy @rochestermn.gov; ward2 @ci.stpaul.mn.us; ward3 @ci.stpaul.mn.us; mike .trepanier @brooklynpark.org; Verbrugge, Jamie; abdi.warsame @minneapolismn.gov; Jeff .Weisensel @ci.rosemount.mn.us; swells @coonrapidsmn.gov; votewojcilc@ gmail .com;jzanmiller @cityofwsp.org Subject: Mn Activities During the Upcoming NLC Congressional -City Conference Attachments: Memo to Delegates 2014.docx Good Afternoon — I am happy to let you know that the MN delegation to the upcoming NLC Congressional -City Conference Washington is growing! I look forward to seeing all of you there. A copy of the memo for MN delegates, describing our events during the conference, is attached. Rather than send this to just the new registrants I am sending it to everyone as a reminder. For those of you who received it about a week ago, there have been no changes from that earlier copy. If you are a staff member who registered your mayor or city councilmember for the conference, please be sure he or she receives a copy. And do feel to contact me if you have any questions prior to or during the conference. All of my contact information is below. Kevin Kevin Frazell, ICMA -CM Director of Member Services Tel: (651) 281 -1215 1 Fax: (651) 215 -4104 Cell: (651) 303 -6034 kfrazell(a,lmc.org I www:lmc.org League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Ave. West St. Paul, MN 55103 j,EAGUE 0 MINNESOTA CITIES To: Minnesota City Officials Attending the 2014 NLC Congressional -City Conference (CCC) in Washington, D.C. From: Kevin Frarell, LMC Director of Member Services Re: Minnesota Activities'During the Upcoming NLC Congressional =City Conference I look forward to seeing you•at the 2014 NLC Congressional -City Conference (CCC), March 8 — 12, in Washington. The' following contains information about the Minnesota activities that will take place during the conference. As part of this memo you'll also find informafion on this year's legislative priorities and a listing of the schedulers for the Congressional offices should you want to request an individual meeting to discuss local issues unique to your city. Our events this year will` be: Monday, March 10, 5:00 — 7:00 p.m. — Capitol Hill "Celebrate Minnesota Cities" Reception Rayburn Building, Room B-354 - The Rayburn building is on the south side of the Capitol. For anyone taking the Metro, go to the Capitol South station, and then walk one block north and 2 blocks Nest Our thanks to Emily Tranter and the Minnesota State Society for their usual hosting of what has become one of the highlights of the CCC. Minnesota city delegates, along with our Congressional delegation and their staff, are invited to this time of informal networking on Capitol Hill. Guests are also welcome; a RSVP is not required. Wednesday, March 12, 8:30 — 10:30 a.m. Meeting with Our Congressional Delegation Library of Congress, Tttonras Jefferson Building, Is' Floor Members Room (LJ 162) - -- The Jefferson Building is located at the northeast corner of P Street and Constitution Avenue, immediately east of the Capitol and south of the Supreme Court. It is a short two blocks directly north of the Capitol South Metro station This event has two purposes. First, to meet with our Senators and Representatives as they are available and can drop by. Second, for Minnesota delegates who are members of the NLC Steering Committees to offer brief reports on their deliberations and policy agendas for the upcoming year. A light breakfast will be available for you to enjoy during the meeting. Please attend and try to be there the whole time! — We already,have confirmation from members of Congress who will be arriving both early and late within our 8:30--10:30 timeframe. Based on the preliminary roster of registrants, it appears that our group will not be large this year. Therefore, we strongly encourage you to make a very high priority of attending this Wednesday morning group meeting, even if you have scheduled an individual meeting with a Senator or your representative at another time during your stay in Washington. We want to make sure that our Senators and Representatives continue to see this meeting as an important demonstration of our collective concern about federal issues. The trip from the conference area ( Wardman Hotel) to the Library of Congress can take a good 30 or more during rush hour traffic, so be sure to allow plenty of time. Building Entrance and Luggage - The public is not allowed into the Jefferson building until 8:30, but those with meetings can normally enter under the main stairs a bit earlier. If you're leaving for the airport immediately following the meeting, please feel free to bring your luggage with you. There is plenty of space in this large room to store it in the back. Security simply asks that you make sure there is nothing in your luggage that looks like a weapon — gun, knife, etc. No Tuesday Reception at the Ward m an/In dividual Meetings with Members of Congress LMC no longer holds a Tuesday afternoon reception and policy briefing at the Wardman hotel. As noted above, the reports from our NLC Steering committee members are now a part of our meeting at the Library of Congress on Wednesday morning. Conference events end at around 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday making that afternoon a good time to schedule an individual meeting with your member of Congress or staff if' you like. The always popular- Capitol Steps comedy troupe performs at the Wardman at 6:30 p.m. Legislative Priorities NLC and LMC legislative policy priorities for 2014 include: • Marketplace Fairness Act — Sales tax collection on Internet and other remote sales • Investment in Transportation • Tax- exemption on municipal bonds • Immigration reform • The city role in strengthening the education pipeline • Support for community resilience from extreme weather. events Further inf6rrization about these priorities is attached. Please take time to familiarize yourself with how these issues may specifically impact your city. QUESTIONS? - Should you have any questions or concerns about plans for the Congressional - City Conference, please contact me per the information below. During the conference you will able to reach me at 651- 303 -6034; you may call or text. I'll also have access to my e -mail address kfiazell bImc.org throughout the conference. Executive Director Jim Miller and I look forward to seeing you in Washington! Kevin Frazell, ICMA -CM Director of Member Services Tel: (651) 281 -1215 Cell: Call or Text: (651) 303 -6034 kfrazella- Imc.org i 1 LFAGU E of MINNESOTA CITIES 2014 Federal Priorities Support Ma_ rketplace Fairness We ask Congress to pass the Marketplace Fairness Act to place brick - and -mortar community businesses on a level playing field with online retailers and afford consumers more choice through fair competition. Allowing state and local governments the flexibility to collect the taxes already owed to them on remote online purchases removes an unfair disadvantage for local businesses, while helping close budget gaps. Invest in Local Transportation Priorities We ask Congress to authorize a new, long -term federal surface transportation program that recognizes the central role of transportation to local economies and includes local voices in planning and project selection. With a strong federal partnership, cities can continue transportation and infrastructure investments that ensure everyone has access to education, training and employment. The program must provide cities a greater role in decision - making for transportation projects to meet community goals and recognize the role of metropolitan economies to the nation's economic wellbeing and competitiveness. The overall transportation system must be made more efficient, including upgrades to older systems and the addition of new modes like light rail and bus rapid transit. Protect Municipal Bonds We oppose any attempt to eliminate or limit the traditional tax exemption for municipal bonds, whether as a part of a deficit reduction plan, a push for comprehensive tax reform or as an offset for new spending. While cities support the need to address the nation's budget deficit, in addition to increasing taxes, the federal government could raise revenue by expanding what is subject to being taxed (broadening the base). Fix the Nation's Broken Immigration System Minnesota cites call on Congress and the Administration to pass a comprehensive immigration reform bill that will fix the nation's broken immigration system that hurts families, communities and our economy. For far too long our immigration system has torn apart families, allowed cultural misunderstandings to threaten our communities and held back economic growth by keeping a substantial population from being able to fully participate. Cities need a plan for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a path to citizenship, strong border enforcement and support for cities and towns to integrate immigrants into their communities and allow them to make both cultural and economic contributions to the nation. Strengthen the Nation's Education Pipeline Cities seek to partner with the Department of Education to strengthen the education pipeline from early childhood through improved postsecondary success. That means increasing the visibility, understanding and appreciation of the role that cities can play in leading educational change by advancing strong early childhood opportunities, citywide high - quality afterschool programs and strategies to improve postsecondary success rates. We need Congress to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which includes important education programs such as Title I, so that states and localities will have the tools they need to improve their local education systems. Support Community Resilience ' As extreme weather events become more common, local governments in all geographic and climatic regions are looking for resources to assist them in anticipating, preparing for and adapting to these events. We ask Congress and the Administration to help local governments conduct vulnerability assessments, and develop and implement adaptation and resilience action plans. This includes passing the STRONG Act (Strengthening the Resiliency of our Nation on the Ground). Cities need stronger federal support to leverage resources most effectively, learn from and act on the latest information available on climate change and find ways to partner with regional and state agencies that encourage smart planning. MN Congressional Offices Scheduling Staff 15 Tim Walz (202) 225 -2472 1722 Longworth, Bldg. Denise Fleming Fax: (202) 225 -3433 denise.flemin mail.house. ov 2" John Kline (202) 225 -2271 _ 1210 Longworth Bldg. Allison Kapsner Fax: (202) 225 -2595 allison.kapsner@mail.house.gov 3 rci Erik Paulsen (202) 225 -2871 126 Cannon Bldg. Kate Paul Fax: (202) 225 -6351 kate.paul@mail.house.gov 4 Betty McCollum (202) 225 -6631 1714 Longworth Bldg. Meredith Raimondi Fax: (202) 225 -1968 meredith.raimondi mail.house. ov 5 Keith Ellison. (202) 225 -4755 1122 Longworth Bldg: Dustin Brandenburg Fax: (202) 225 74886 ellison.scheduler mail. house. ov 6 Michele Bachmann (202) 225 -2331 107 Cannon Bldg. Kim Rubin Faxd: (202) 225 -6475 kim.rubin@mail.house.gov 7 Collin Peterson (202) 225 -2165 2211 Rayburn Bldg. Cherie Slayton Fax: (202) 225 -1593 cherie.sla ton mail. house. ov Bin Rick Nolan (202) 225 -6211 2447 Rayburn Bldg. lone Yates Fax: (202) 225 -0699 nolanschedule mail. house. gov Senate Amy Klobuchar (202) 224 -3244/ _ 302 Hart Bldg. (202) 224 -6533 Caroline Selby scheduling@klobuchar.senatp.gov Senate Al Franken (202) 224 -5641 320 Hart Bldg. same (202) 224 -1849 Tara Mazer schedulin franken.senate. ov rev 1/17/2014 Heather Branigin From: Dan Olson <dgolson999 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 1:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Mayor Hovland: I. enjoyed meeting with you Saturday morning after our walk in Southdale. I was the guy who plays in the Seagate league at Fred Richards. I am writing on behalf of the 100+ Seagate golfers who cherish the course for its ability to accommodate our league, which consists of golfers of both genders, and an enormous range of abilities. I am writing to plead with you and the Edina City Council to prevent the serious and irreversible tragedy of losing a beloved city asset, the Fred Richards golf course. I have attended the two public meetings (Jan. 30 at Braemar, and the Feb. 11 Park Board meeting), at which the outpouring of public support for the course.was summarily dismissed and ignored, first by the City Manager, and then by the Park Board). I was shocked to hear that the City Manager didn't modify his sales pitch in the slightest after the Jan 30 meeting, in which hundreds of passionate supporters made extremely valid criticisms of the process. Yes, the numbers of rounds at golf courses -has been declining, but I envision a resurgence of numbers AT THE FRED. Some members of the Park Board seemed to agree with the consensus of the community, that the decision to close the Fred as :part of the 6 -point plan to "improve our municipal golf operations so that it can invest in its golf facilities" is being made with too much haste and ignoring community input. But these members then unanimously voted to approve the proposal anyway. Everyone involved seems to be so certain that the Fred's closing will go ahead, they don't give any scrutiny to the assumptions. I believe that this summer the community will rally around this course, and substantially increase it's utilization. I` believe that we ought to be given the opportunity to prove how valuable this golf course is to the community, by delaying, and then ultimately reversing the decision to close the course. The City Manager's presentation (and answers to some followup questions) played loose with a number of metrics and statistics, in an effort to mislead the Park Board. First of all, bringing up the city's bond rating is a red herring. It is my understanding that the Fred is owned outright by the city (the debt was paid in full in,2013). Yet Eric Roggeman (1:40:30 into the meeting, available here: http:// edina .granicus.com /MediaPlayer.r)hr)?view id =7 &clip id =1881) cites the debt payments as losses incurred by Fred, and anticipates future losses because of fictitious needs for future investment. No one has ever said anything about Fred needing upgrading. The only legitimate on -going expense that he could cite is that fertilizer delivered to Braemar has to be transported across town to the Fred. That's it. The flyer distributed at the January 30th meeting summarizes each of the six points of the "six -point strategy to make Braemar Golf course financially stable and self- sufficient, ...." It begins: 1. Purchasing Normandale Executive Golf Course in 1992 was a wise City investment ...With the decline in public golf, though, the City must focus on its primary golf product at Braemar. . ." The City manager simply asserts that the City must close Fred without any supporting justification or explanation. Stating it was a wise investment, and then making no mention of the fact that it is completely paid for, is disingenuous at best. Points 2 - 6 are all about attempts at making Braemar itself self - sufficient. I think there should be a vigorous debate about the wisdom of "improving" Braemar (meaning, bringing it up to modern standards). Once completed, greens fees will probably need to be raised to $75 a round (from $39). This may increase total revenue, or it may not. But one thing is for sure, closing Fred will not have made any appreciable difference. But closing Fred will certainly displace nearly all, if not all of the Fred leagues (the flyer states "No golfers will be displaced. The City's research shows that Braemar has the capacity to handle most of the leagues ... ") This is UTTERLY FALSE. The City's research shows this to be true? What research? In the flyer, the green "financial impact" box is so full of inaccurate and misleading numbers, that to rely on it for guidance in any decision would be foolhardy. $734,000 to close Fred Richards. Really? When pressed at the Park Board meeting, Eric Roggeman (1:40:30) cited the debt payments (that ended in 2013) as losses to be incurred by Fred going forward. This is UTTERLY FALSE. $1,307,900 by increasing fees and marketing. Really? There is no dollar figure in this chart to account for the substantial improvements that would be necessary to justify raising greens fees to result in this figure. It is my understanding that literally ZERO DOLLARS has ever been spent on promotion or advertising.for the Fred. If the City Manager believes that he can increase Braemar's revenue by $1.3 million with some promotion and advertising, do you think the Fred could increase it's revenue by whatever incredibly small amount necessary to justify it's existence, if SOME money were spent on promotion. When I talk to golfers at nice courses all over the Twin Cities, I fell them about Fred, and none of them has ever heard of it; it is completely invisible from any street. The sign is barely visible crowded .underneath the bank sign with which it shares a driveway. I tell them, "you know, where 76th St veers south? That's where there's a wonderful executive golf course ". Oh, and the flyer stated the Park Board Public Hearing was 7 p.m. Feb 12 (it was actually the 11th). I wonder how many people at the Braemar meeting missed the Park Board meeting because of this typo (a tactic infamously used in cities to mislead the public into thinking election day is the day after the actual election day, to disenfranchise them). Even so, there were hundreds in attendance sporting their "save the fred" t- shirts. There are three types of golf courses: exclusive private courses where rich people can play whenever they want, privately -owned courses open to the public (semi - private), where the owners or shareholders insist on profitability, and municipal courses, which do NOT have to be profitable, because they benefit the taxpayers in tangible AND INTANGIBLE ways. There are reports in the media of semi - private courses closing. As these semi - private courses are.closed, there will be MORE demand for the remaining public courses. Also, everyone in a city benefits from golf courses, not just the golfers . Open space, wildlife habitat, etc. are a community asset, even for those who choose not to walk the course. -Also, I assume that Edina residents are welcome to use the course when it's not being played (out of season hiking, cross - country skiing, etc.). As the number of golfers relative to available courses reaches an equilibrium, I would expect demand AT THE FRED to increase. Fred Richards is exactly the type of course that future golfers will be seeking out (easier, shorter, less time consuming), a point actually inadvertently made by Ms Kattrel at the Park Board meeting). It is obvious to me that there must be a back room deal in place with the developer that the land will be made available, and the City Manager is trying to prove that closing Fred is a critical part of the 6 point plan to "improve golf operations to in spite of the fact that the Fred can stand on its own. At the very least, it would be extremely short- sighted to close Fred in order to implement all of the Braemar plans (which may or may not improve golf revenues). It may be that in Edina, the City Manager has complete authority to make the reckless and irresponsible decision to close Fred, and pump millions of dollars into dubious schemes.at Braemar. But in my opinion, he is doing a disservice to the city. Mayor Hovland, you, and the members of the City Council must stop him. Fred Richards (the man) was a former mayor who had the vision to invest in Edina's golf facilities. If his legacy can be sold off in a back -room deal with a developer, what hope is there.that you can leave any meaningful legacy? Sincerely, Dan Olson Seagate Technology (on behalf of the 100+ members of the Seagate Golf League) Heather Branigin From: Lisa Krohn < lisa. krohn @hennepintheatretrust.org> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:23 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save Fred Richards golf course Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Sincerely, Lisa Krohn Edina resident (6428 Tingdale Ave) Lisa Krohn I Director of Marketing I Hennepin Theatre Trust 612.455.9521 1612.455.9502 fx Lisa. KrohnC D Henn epinTheatreTrust.org 615 Hennepin Avenue, Suite 140 1 Minneapolis, MN 155403 Hennepi nTheatreTrust. org Hennepin Theatre Trust, owner of the historic Orpheum, State, Pantages and New Century Theatres, is an independent, non -profit organization dedicated to arts - inspired community cultural development. 1 Heather Branigin From: Jitka / Michael Sebek <jitka @skypoint.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:35 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Dear City Council, - Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input,. public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. We are supporting this pledge, The Sebeks 1 Heather Branigin From: Rick Ites <Rick @cahillfa.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 3:55 PM To: Edina Mail; Scott Neal; Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Good Afternoon, Thank you for giving me the opportunity to summarize my observations on Golf Operations in Edina. The following is my background: • Resident of Edina since 1978 • President of Braemar Men's Club o 1999, 2009, 2013, 2014 • President of Braemar Golf Association o 2011 —present o 9 member board that oversees golf leagues that use Braemar golf facilities My theme is the restoration of golf in Edina, back to a leading golf course. At one time: • 3 — 5 year wait to join the Men's Club • Parking lots full of cars most days • Tee time were difficult to obtain • Practice facility well maintained Overall course conditions were excellent I feel the opportunity is now in front of us to reestablish many of these attributes that we had for many years. The accomplishment of these will require prudent and careful expenditures of community resources throughout the coming years. I feel that the practice facility is the most important place to start. By making the commitment to accomplish this beginning in 2014, will generate more net operating cash to be used for other needed improvements. This requires the building of a master strategy to restore our community asset back to where it once was. My hope is that our golf in Edina will once again be able to be used for the benchmark measurement for other communities' golf operations. At last evening's Braemar Men's Club Board Meeting (February 27, 2014), a motion was passed unanimously that the Braemar Men's Club has no position on the proposed recommendation put forth by the Edina Park Board which will be presented to the City Council March 4`h. This, in effect, means that no individual member of the Men's Club can speak on behalf of the Men's Club; only on behalf of themselves. I look forward to being a member of the Task Force working with both the Braemar Golf Course and the Edina Park Board to develop and implement the above mentioned strategy. Regards, Rick Ites Phone: (952) 451 -2835 (cell) Phone: (952) 926 -1659 (work) Fax: (952) 926 -0633 (work) rickCa)-cahillfa.com Heather Brani.gin From: Ede Rice <erice521 @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 4:22 PM To: Edina Mail; Joni Bennett; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Josh Sprague; Ann Swenson Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Mayor and City Council Members I am writing to voice my concern with the upcoming vote on March 4th to close the Fred Richards Golf Course. 1 have been a volunteer with the Minnesota Womens Golf Association for 25+ years, the Minnesota GolfAssociation for 20 years and the United States Golf A cociation for the last 9 years. 1 believe the sentiment to close the golf course is premature. Yes, it is true that golf has experienced a downturn in the lastseveral vcans due to a nwnher of factors including poor weather andeconomic recession. Flowcver. I don't agree that closing Fred Richards immediately. is the best solution. What is the rush? I believe our annmunity would be better served to put aclosure on hold. while other solutions to keepingil open are investigated. Fred Richards serves a unique part of our golfing cormnunity. It offers a smaller, relaxed aunosphere where young and old, beginners and families can comfortably enjoy the game. I know a number of individuals who have some excellent ideas to make it even better. These golfers will not likely move to the Braemar Fxccutive Course as the experience is completelvdifferent. My understanding is that Fred Richards Golf Course is currently breaking even. It also has been reported that the redevelopment of Pentagon Park and water issues are ancillary contributing factors to such an immediate decision. 1 urge you to vote no on closure ordelay the vote for at least a year as other opportunities for Fred Richards to be a viable and successFul operation are considered. Sincerely, Ede Rice Edina Resident 4001 West 49th Street 952- 927 -8372 Ede Rice 1952-927-8372 1 erice521 cD,gmail.com Heather Branigin From: Karen Doll <karen.doll @comcast.net >. Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 5:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4th 2014. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. It is perplexing why this decision would have been rushed through so quickly and without community communication. This should be a community based decision without influence of private developing companies. Karen Doll 1 Heather Branigin From: Tim McNamara <tim @mcpub.net> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:42 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Fwd: Braemar Golf Analysis Mayor and Edina City Council members It has now been 2 -1/2 weeks since I sent the email below. It is astounding to me that in all this tune the only council member to respond to my email was Mary Brindle. During our brief email exchange she said that my proposal was something that was interesting and waranted further investigation. As elected representatives, it would seem that when a life long Edina resident or any resident, would take the time to sit down and compose a reasonable analysis of what we all know is a very volitale issue facing our city. in particular this upcoming council meeting, more than one council member would reply. The fact is for some time, months or maybe years, the city has spent tens of thousands of dollars hiring consultants, some qualif ed and some not, to provide a plan for the future of Edina's golf enterprise. All this time no one from the city has inquired or leveraged the considerable brain power that exists in our community. Nor have they asked golfers, with the exception of one survey, why golfers golf at a given course. Golfers play golf for the golf!! It has nothing to do with the food or the size of the clubhouse. It has to do with the location and the quality of the course. Price is a consideration and availability. But both price and availability can be an asset if the "quality" course is difficult to get a tee for because it has match it's capacity for play to it demand for play. I just read that there is a line item in the golf proposal to spend 67K in marketing in 2014 and 143K by 2020. Not a single marketing dollar would need to be spent if the capacity meets the demand. This in itself' would save hundreds of thousands of dollars. The best marketing is quality and location. Right now Braemar only has one of the two, with way too much capacity. Because of this it's costs are out of balance. i was present at the recent Park Board meeting where there was a unanimous vote by the board to close bred Richards. I was amazed at the political cover that almost every board member sought to justify what appeared to be a pre - determined vote of closure. Each member sympathized with the residents and some even said that there should be more time to gather information. One board member made the presumptuous statement that every business person in the room would agree with him. Well, I was in the room and I have owned and run a business for 18 years and I don't agree with him. Because it is all about spending money when it doesn't have be. All board members had the same 3 voting options, Vote to close, Vote to not close or Vote to allow more time to gather more information. Nonetheless, they all voted to close. Then in the recent Sun article there was this promise of more transparency in the future and more public involvement. As of the press date of the Sun article is was stated, there were roughly 60 emails sent to the city regarding the golf issue. Which astounded me even more that I had heard no response. l will read and return 60 enmails on any give morning. Please take the time to read mine and do what you should always do first. Respond and communicate! Sincerely Tim McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr., Edina, MN.55436 952.922.4220 • fax 952.922.4287 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Tim McNamara [mailto:tim @mcpub.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 02 :22 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast:net, mail @EdinaMN.gov, mbrindle @comcast.net, joshsprague @edinarealty.com, swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Braemar Golf Analysis Edina.City Council A little "venting in the first two paragraphs, please be patient. For the last year I have heard rumblings with regard to the Fred Richards and Braemar golf facility. Recently, it seems that you our elected city representatives and the un- elected park and recreation board are doing once again, what seems to be a pattern of waiting until the last minute to announce to Edina residents, who you were elected to represent, preordained plans to spend our tax dollars. Behind the scene, the city spends city money to do studies using unqualified consultants, before they survey it's residents. Residents, who many are consultants, business owner and problem solvers. For the past 15 years, I have played golf at Braemar at least once week with a group that consists of now 72 golfers. Our group is not the Braemar Mens Club. Started many years ago by Pat Manion, we have grown to be the largest single non -city organized contributors of annual rounds played at Braemar. Week after week we show up and play, we don't cancel our tee times because of the weather, we play. We don't come to the course because of the food or the club house, we come for the golf. Over the years we have noticed the lack of demand for play and tee times. Seems the city could have started with asking us when they started their analysis of the facility. But know one has asked. So here is my unsolicited analysis as a business owner. Background for a business approach to a solution: - Unlike government, a business does not have an open checkbook to make mistakes when the climate changes for it's products or services. The problem should be broken down into small segments or divisions. For Braemar these would be 3 divisions; the driving range, the 2 executive courses and the 27 hole championship course. On the surface it looks like Braemar should be making a lot of money because it has so much capacity. However, the real answer is it has too much capacity and exceeds the current demand for golf and not enough capacity at the driving range. Also, excess capacity comes with excess costs which often times is the reason for operating losses. The solution is not to raise prices on an assumed demand, it is to reduce capacity and improve the capacity that remains. Nor is the solution to eliminate effectively both executive courses and replace them with a single par 3 course. The following is what I would suggest to the City Council, for FREE. Keeping in mind that if I were giving this advice in my business I would have charged for it. - Close the Executive course on the Braemar property. - Increase the footprint of the current driving range from the east of the first hole to just west of John Harris Way. Build a first class driving range, teaching and practice facility on this larger footprint. - Sell the land north of Braemar Blvd to a developer for housing. No residents are going to show up a the council meeting demanding that it remain a golf course, and saying that it was reason they bought their home and now there property will have less value. Because there.are no homes directly on the course. - Three years from the beginning of the renovation, sell part of the land that holes 19 -27 currently sit on to a developer. The same applies with respect to resistance from residents as in the sale of the north of Braemar Blvd land. - Re- configure holes 8, 17 and 18. - Move all the executive course demand over to Fred Richards. If the city turns it into a park the city still has costs and will never have revenue. Also, it would retain an Executive Course facility which is not the same as a Par 3 course as proposed. So it doesn't make sense or should I say cents. - Using the revenues from the land sale, improve 1 -18 (sand traps, fairways and greens with some re- design) and build the practice area over a 2 year transition. - The transition and improvements could occur over a 2 year period using 19 -27 as the second 9 holes with 1 -9 improvements occurring in the first year and 10 -18 occurring in the second year. - Once improvements are completed and because of the location, this would establish Braemar as the premier 18 hole public golf course within the metro area. Residents and non - residents would be offered patron access, non - patron residents would pay a reduced rate and non- residents would pay a higher rate. Example Chaska Towne Course rate structure. Savings for the city would be in a reduction in capacity, which would yield a reduction in maintenance costs 18 holes only, rather than 27 holes. Plus the revenue from the land sale and additional property tax base from the newly developed land. These revenues would more than offset the costs of the renovation and may even pay off the 13 million dollar bond which pasted without a vote from Edina residents. I was told last week that a council member, who I will not name, recently said, "The City Council has no appetite for selling city land at this time ". Respectfully, I don't believe that this council member or the council as a whole owns this land. The taxpayers do and it is becoming very difficult to continue to live in a place where I grew up and see the wasteful spending and government approach decision making on a daily basis. Over the past 21 years I have seen my property taxes increase 4X with no end in site! Sincerely Tim McNamara Tim McNamara 6201 Crescent Dr., Edina, MN 55436 952.922.4220 • fax 952.922.4287 Heather Branigin From: Cosette DeCesare <cosettedecesare @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 20147:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred > Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4th 2014. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. > Cosette DeCesare 7434 West Shore Dr > Sent from my iPhone 0 Heather Branigin From: Leslie Sharpe <leslie.a.sharpe @icloud.com> Sent: Friday, February 28,2014 10:29 PM To: Edina Mail' Cc: Leslie Sharpe Subject: Braemar Golf Course Renovation To members of the Edina City Council: I want to express my enthusiastic support for the proposal passed by the Park Board with reference to renovation of the Braemar Golf Course. I have been informed that the Golf Dome and Driving Range have always been significant revenue generators. There is space available and a clear need for renovation of the Driving Range, and I encourage you to approve moving forward on that ASAP. Modification of the existing Executive Course will be necessary; in my view, the proposed conversion to a 9 -hole Par 3 Course would be a good idea which would also enhance speed of play. The main 18 -hole Golf Course has been allowed to decline over the years, with many adverse results: Greens are inconsistent; Bunkers have irregular lips, sand in them contains rocks and gravel, and there are too few rakes; drainage problems have produced rutted and, potholed areas; irrigation is inconsistent due to the aged system; Cart Paths are limited, too narrow, and often lead to a pothole or a compacted dead grass area at the end, rather than serving as an attractive route to protect the course; Tees are not all level, and grass is inconsistent; Rough areas are also often -wet enough to prevent proper mowing, so balls are hard to find and shots are needlessly difficult. These issues do not impugn the efforts of the manager and maintenance crew, who have labored mightily to do a good job with too - limited funding. They are a list of opportunities to turn the course around, given adequate funding to make the needed improvements. There is no reason why Edina cannot provide a Golf Course of quality at least the equal of other similar local communities. I believe the plan proposed to you will achieve our goal, and therefore deserves your approval. The longer term should also involve analysis of the Clunie 9 holes, which might be incorporated into a re- design of the entire Campus; the end result may be an outstanding 18 -hole Main Course, and also a new Executive Course to complement the Par -3 Course alluded to above. Revenue flow from the currently proposed improvements should make that feasible. None of this will ever happen if you do not approve the current proposal to begin this project. Please do so for the good of Edina, and for the new guests we hope to attract to our Golf Course. Thank you for your consideration. Leslie A Sharpe MD leslieasharpe @gmail.com Heather Branigin From: Fred Friends <newlawlifel @hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 6:27 AM To: Jon Tevlin; Josephine Marcotty; kdiaz @startribune.com; May Yee Chen; nathan.nelson @startribune.com; Warren Wolfe; Lori Sturdevant; Jill Burcum; Jeremy Olson; Forster, Julie; jcoolman @acnpapers.com; Stephanie Hemphill; Rupa Shenoy; msteil @mpr.org; Elizabeth Baier; Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: RE: Great Story on the Environment - Edina Attachments: Fred Mandatory EAW 00I.tif Here is Another Part of the Great Story in Edina As part of the ongoing drama in Edina the Citizens are fighting the City Again! The Citizens have demanded that City abide by the Minnesota Rules on Environmental Review which requires them to conduct an Environmental Review when they convert the land, free of charge to the developer, from a Golf Course to a Stormwater Retention Basin for Pentagon Park. This is different from the Citizen's Petition filed last week, this is a Minnesota State Rule and if Edina ignores it, the Citizen's would be able to pursue their legal remedies in court. By the way City Manager Scott Neal, this time when you get the email you should deliver it to each City Council member and the Mayor. Watch the fireworks at Edina City Hall on Tuesday night, March 4 as the City Council takes up this issue February 26, 2014 Vla electronic mall sneal@Edin_ aMN.aov and Hand Delivery City of Edina Minnesota 4801 West 501" Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 c/o Scott Neal - Adminstrator RE: Demand for Mandatory Environmental Review— City of Edina Land Use Conversion Dear Mr. Neal — It has come to my attention that the City of Edina is planning on implementing a project, as that term is defined in Minnesota Rules Section 4410, eta/., that would physically manipulate the environment including the closure, land use conversion and joint repurposing of Fred Richards Golf Course including inclusion of the former golf course in the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park office complex along 77th Street in the City of Edina. The total site area is, on information and belief, approximately 83 acres in size based on site renderings published by the developer and information from the City's website about the golf course; and would likely redevelop the entire combined site over the next 2 -15 years in the future. Proposed uses,indude office, retail, residential, and a hotel and conversion of the City owned golf course into a stormwater drainage area for the development. The Developer is asking the City for a PUD type of Development and inclusion of the golf course for its plans. Which would allow greater flexibility of land uses, amenities, setbacks, pedestrian connection, and closing the Fred Richards Golf to redevelop this City open space into a stormwater drainage and retention system for the development and discussed in the attached material (the "Project "). The Project falls into a Mandatory Category for Environmental Review pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 and 4400 Subpart 36 and a Land use conversion, including Golf Courses" I demand that the City conduct the Mandatory Environmental Review as required by Minnesota Rules. An EAW must be prepared for projects that meet or exceed threshold of any of the criteria listed in Subparts 2 through 37 of the rule. If the project is an "expansion" of an existing project, like here where the City of Edina is seeking to combine the Fred Richards golf course with the Pentagon Park development. This demand should be considered separate and distinct from the Petition for Discretionary Environmental Review filed earlier this week. It is time for the City to abide by the laws of the State of Minnesota and perferm this review. Si erely �cz,J j - OP-% Ms. Colleen Wolfe C. Edina City Council Members Minnesota Environmental Quality Board Hillcrest Development Edina Sun Current Star Tribune Pioneer Press National Public Radio Heather Branigin From: Colette Diegel <cad202O @mac.com> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 10:24 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Executive Renvate all you want but NO MORE WATER FEATURES! There are enough water hazards on that course already. Holes 1, 3, 4, 6,and 7 have really "GOOD" "BAD" ones ! and then 8 has also on the side. That is SIX out of NINE holes. For heavens sake give a poor golfer a chance..... We skip the 7th hold altogether- because of that water / pond /lake there.... Colette Diegel Heather Branigin From: Ann Baumann <ann.baumann @yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 10:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf Course To Whom It May Concern: My name is Ann Baumann and I have been a summer employee at Bracmar Golf Course since 2000. i have worked with and for John Valliere, Todd Anderson, Amy Smith, Mary Wooldridge and Jeff Homberger since i started there as a 22 year old teacher who was looking for a summer job, and I consider these people more than co- workers or my bosses, they are my friends. As I approached and prepared for my 15"'summer there, I was disheartened to hear that Jeff Homberger's position at the golf course is in jeopardy. I understand that every golf course in Minnesota is losing money and each one is taking different approaches to save money and simply stay alive. I know Braemar and the City of Edina are not immune to the recent downslide in the golf industry. and something needs to be done to help keep the course moving in. the right direction. I understand the cultural and historical value of Braemar to its citizens -which must bring immense pressure to you and your partners at City Hall to please everyone. With.that being said, 1 would really like to share with you the value I see in .lcff Homberger and his position. As a long -term, seasonal employee who also works in a leadership role in public education, I know the importance of customer service. A good customer experience keeps a. good organization going. 1 feel that Jeff has been an invaluable part of the customer service that Braemar has .provided and continues to improve. When Braemar Patrons enter the pro -shop, Jeff greets the majority by name as he has known them, their children and likely their grandchild during his 20 -year tenure at Braemar. When a customer expresses concerns or complains about their experience, Jeff is the first to look these customers in the eye, listen to them and make them feel heard and understood. As a golfer and an employee, I believe these are the behaviors and characteristics that keep our customers coming back. If the role of managing the pro - shop /golf operations (Jeffs job) and the greater golf course events/merchandise (Mary's job) were to fall on one person, i feel like the greatest area that would suffer would be the person to person contact and customer service that is what has made many of our patrons continue to return year after year. Not having someone like Jcffwho is working "behind the counter" and keeping a pulse on the daily operations of the course will make the Braemar experience suffer and customers will notice. There is a reason why we have been able to keep seasonal employees 'at Braemar year after year. That reason is that Jeff (along with the others at Braemar) have created an environment in which leadership is provided and employees are trusted to use their expertise to create a good experience for our customers. Year after year, I have witnessed Jeff take the time to get to know his employees, check -in with there in the off season and treat them as if they were his own family when necessary. Jeff has missed family vacations for the sake of others going on their own. I cannot recall a Memorial Day, Fourth of July, or Labor Day that Jeff hasn't worked so that his colleagues within the Braemar leadership can take off to enjoy with their families. 1 firmly, believe lie makes many hard decisions with the best interests of the golf course in mind. After 14 summers of working at Braemar (and truly enjoying it), I know that it is the returning summer staff that keep things moving on daily basis. While 1 cannot speak for everyone, I do believe that knowing Jeff will not be there to be our leader and advocate will cause many of us to consider whether or not Braemar is the seasonal job we have truly enjoyed in past years. The experience and knowledge that we bring to the daily operations of Braemar would truly be missed if we were replaced by temporary, seasonal employees that were not invested in the golf course and were just looking for a way to earn extra money or fill their free time before heading off to the next semester of college or a full -time job. Again, this loss of staff /experience would directly affect the city's and the course's mission to provide and improve customer service. I understand and respect the hard decisions concerning Braemar and Fred Richards that are ahead of you. 1 understand that you'and others at City Hall are being called to make changes at the risk of job; loss and a major cultural change at the city's golf courses. I also understand what its like to work in a public role with a limited budget. However, l felt it was important to voice my concerns about what is on the table for consideration in come days /weeks. In my professional life and "summer life" at Braemar, I have been able to observe a lot and feel that my opinion is valuable as I am the one answering the phones, welcoming customers and interacting with them each time I am there. While I am not at all involved in Braemar on an administrative level, it is my perspective that many things are being overlooked on the ground level. I appreciate you taking the time to read my lengthy email. I felt compelled to advocate for Jeffs position, but my intent was not to be negative or complain to you or anyone else who has to make these hard decisions. Please feel free to contact me if you have questions. Thank You, Ann Baumann 612- 396 -4256 Sent from my iPhone Heather Branigin From: Ron Way <ron- way @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 2:01 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Improving Edina's golf enterprise Attachments: BraemarSTATEMENTii.docx To the Hon. Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council: Next Tuesday you will consider a matter in which several of us have had a strong and long -time interest: the restoration of the city's golf enterprise, and. Braemar Golf Course in particular, to its once -grand status as Minnesota's very best public golf venue. With others, I am sorry that Braemar has deteriorated to the point that it is now considered a third -tier course. Since last fall I have worked with a number of my Braemar friends to once again push to improve the place. One product of that effort is a short statement (attached) that is supported by 75 active golfers at Braemar. But unlike our previous attempts, this time we found that the city's professional staff were willing listeners and, soon, eager supporters of our cause. Also this time, the Braemar Men's Club became a strong supporter of the effort, and that . led to several very productive meetings of the Braemar Greens Committee through last fall and early winter. From all this I can say that Edina's city manager, Scott Neal, and especially Edina's parks director, Ann Kattreh, have done a remarkable job of understanding what needs doing with the golf enterprise and a plan to "consolidate and invest" in a way that can bring quality back to that enterprise. Ms. Kattreh and her staff have conducted themselves in a highly professional manner, and all of us associated with this effort gratefully commend them for all they have done. I urge you to adopt the plan prepared by Mr. Neal and Ms. Kattreh, and approved 7 -0 by the Edina Park Board. It is a thoughtful plan that would promote the kind of distinquished service that is Edina. Thank you for your time, and for all you do for our city. Ron Way, Edina resident and BMC member for nearly 30 years. 5708 Lois Ln., 55439 612 - 986 -5158 Restoring Braemar's Distinguished ,Status For decades after opening to acclaim in 1964, Braemar Golf Course was an elite venue that hosted a PGA event. In 1984 it was rated by Golf Digest as Minnesota's best public course and among America's top 75. Our course was a genuine community asset that helped promote Edina as 'a quality place. For years its tee sheets were so full that golfers gathered at 4 am to get a time for the following Saturday, and high- demand Patron cards were strictly limited to residents. That was then. Now, on the eve of Braemar's Golden Anniversary, the course shows effects of neglect and trimmed budgets. Golfers consider Braemar's to be, at best, of average quality, and its practice range among the region's worst. As elsewhere, Minnesota golf demand is flat, and only those courses of recognized quality and customer care have weathered the revenue downturn. Braemar once boasted some of the highest numbers of rounds played of any golf course anywhere, but its tee sheets aren't so full anymore even though Patron restrictions are gone. Too many of Braemar's regulars now choose to play too much of their golf at other places, and too many have quit due, in regrettable part, to course conditions. For years, as golfers pushed for course improvements, the refrain from management was, "With a full tee sheet, why change ?" But now, the lament has become, as it only can: "We're doing the best we can with what we have." It doesn't have to be this way. For a relatively modest investment Braemar could be restored to its lofty status of 1984. Braemar's reputation in the golf community would recover, and new revenues realized. Braemar could become an asset worthy of the Edina Vision 20120 standard: "distinguishable from other places. " Braemar is beautiful parkland. Its foundation as a golf course is solid with very good hole - routing for the original 18. Greens, always key in defining quality of any course, are good. While putting surfaces have improved in recent years, their pace and consistency must be improved still more to compare favorably with those at competing venues. Braemar has the quality staff and a full line of equipment to make ours some of the best greens anywhere. It comes down to a commitment to make it happen. Other challenges are poor drainage over too much of the course, and an aging irrigation system that works sporadically and fails often. While management and the USGA Green Section have long said that replacing the system is "high- priority," the project continues to slide down the priority list. Addressing greens quality, drainage, and irrigation issues would be giant steps in restoring Braemar's greatness, all at relatively low cost and over a few short years. Edina is about to approve a major makeover of our practice range. The long- overdue project, together with a committed push to polishing Braemar's glow on its Golden Anniversary, would be more than restoring a genuine community asset. An improved practice range would add considerable new revenue. Just as surely, bringing back a quality golf course would both add significant new revenue and recover revenue lost with departed golfers. It's an opportunity worthy of a commitment by a City that prides itself in distinguishable quality. Heather Branigin From: Michael Kavanaugh <mpkavan @icloud.com> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 5:11 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: ron way Subject: Braemar Golf Project To Mayor Hovland and city council I am in support of the plan to renovate the Braemar golf course and driving range. Braemar currently competes with the Mpls. public courses, Brookview and Dwan for the local golfers. If someone is looking for a more quality venue to play it involves a road trip out to Chaska, up to Blaine or south of the Minnesota River. I believe that if Braemar were to upgrade it's facility to a level more equivalent to Bunker Hills, Chaska Town Course or The Meadows it would draw many of the local golfers who would otherwise be taking their business on a road trip. I am very enthusiastic about the plans for development of the driving range /practice facility. I know that I and many of my golfing friends who are patrons of Braemar often go to Highlands or Glen Lake ranges to practice because we can hit off grass instead of the mats Braemar is forced to use because of the small teeing area. I do believe that with the improvements being considered that not only would Edina have a quality facility it could take great pride in but it would also capture a lot of revenue currently being lost to local competition. Thank -you for your consideration Mike Kavanaugh Lifetime resident and °45+ years Braemar golfer 5801 View Lane 952 - 938 -2891 Heather Branigin From: Bill Doll <bill @hattricksports.net> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 11:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred Please vote NO to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4th 2014. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. Heather Branigin From: Colleen Wolfe <colleenwolfe5 @comcast.net> Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 11:09 PM To: Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: Request for March 4th, City Council Meeting To; City Staff Re: City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4`h In a recent meeting with Mayor Hovland, we requested to have one member of our Save the Fred Association Financial team address Council for 15 minutes in order to give him time to fully review alternative proposals developed by our group. In order to grant this request, the Mayor stated that other specific members of our group would have to cede their allotted 3 minutes to the designated representative as noted above. We respectfully request the following: 1. Derek Johnson is designated by the Save the Fred Association Financial team to present recommendations to Council during a 15 minute time block. A PowerPoint presentation to be projected in Council Chambers is to be utilized. 2. Edina residents on the Save the Fred Association Financial team who wish to formally cede their allotted 3 minutes time to Derek Johnson are: Tom Berzinski John Berg Wayde Heirigs Tom Terwilliger Patty Stang Colleen T. Wolfe 952- 250 -6669 1 Heather Branigin From: Colleen Wolfe <colleenwolfe5 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 9:00 AM To: Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: Re: Request for March 4th, City Council Meeting To: City Staff Re: City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4th Good Morning, Please accept this update to my original email sent last night at 1 l 1:08 pm. We would like to request a slight change. The change is for both Derek Johnson and Wayde Heirigs to share the 15 minute time block, as noted in original email, below. Edina residents on the Save the Fred Association Financial team who wish to formally cede their allotted 3 minutes time to Derek Johnson are: Tom Berzinski John Berg William Wolfe Tom Terwilliger Patty Stang Please advise if this request can be accommodated Respectfully, Colleen T. Wolfe 952- 250 -6669 From: "Colleen Wolfe" <colleenwolfe5@com cast. net> To: sneal(a)EdinaMN.gov, mail@edinamn.gov Sent: Saturday, March 1, 2014 11:08:54 PM Subject: Request for March 4th, City Council Meeting To: City Staff Re: City Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4 I 1 In a recent meeting with Mayor Hovland, we requested to have one member of our Save the Fred Association Financial team address Council for 15 minutes in order to give him time to fully review alternative proposals developed by our group. In order to grant this request, the Mayor stated that other specific members of our group would have to cede their allotted 3 minutes to the designated representative as noted above. We respectfully request the following: 1. Derek Johnson is designated by the Save the Fred Association Financial team to present recommendations to Council during a..15 minute time block. A PowerPoint presentation to be projected in,Council Chambers is to be utilized. 2. Edina residents on the Save the Fred Association Financial team who wish to formally cede their allotted 3 minutes time to Derek Johnson are: Tom Berzinski John Berg Wayde Heirigs Tom Terwilliger Patty Stang Colleen T. Wolfe 952- 250 -6669 2 Heather Branigin From: Denise Dorgan <denisedorgan @me.com> . Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 8:58 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please do not close Fred Dear City Council, We live in the Cornelia neighborhood and my Son uses the Fred Richards golf course every week. Please do not vote to close Fred.. Please take more time for the Public to help find other solutions' to improve Braemar without closing Fred. Please do not close fred and have our home values drop because of it. Again please vote NO to closing Fred. Thanks, Denise Dorgan den isedorgan .me. corn 612- 309 -0361 Heather Branigin From: Kimberly Stratton <kim- mattstratton @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:25 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Vote No to closing Fred Richards Golf Course Dear City Council, We encourage you to please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf C01,(rse when you vote on -I- uesday, Marcl -► 4th. We feel you shouldn't rush the closure, of Fred R(chafds lbeforc: collecting public feedback, opening this topic up to public discussion, and providing a (master plan for the golf i:011fSes, We liC3 not f(;C,i tili.a pIC1Ge..a hc.,;, tik:t;?(I fair UI t;;►;)k;l "i 'i.)r recowir7aend you open t,1p the discussion on how we earl Upgrade Braemar. and keep I ted Ric:,h ard' golf course opc.�n, Please vote no to closino Fred Richards, Thank YOU for yOc.1r consideratiora. Sincerely, Kim and Mutt Stratton 1 Heather Branigin From: Beth Fraley <bafraley518 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:37 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: SAVE FRED RICHARDS I find it amazing that a city that prides itself on Expensive police stations, the state of the arts police cars, education , historical neighborhoods....cant see the value in Fred Richards Golf course. All of my children and their friends play Fred 3 -4 times a week, it is a GEM> I feel once you sell out you will never regain that property... there has to be a solution to keeping Fred, I keep thinking of the wonderful homes and families that are on the course, what will happen to their property values? Fred is a safe and beautiful spot in our city, please reconsider your development plans! Beth and Chris Fraley EDINA Heather Branigin From: Barbara Hoganson < barbara.hoganson @hardeninc.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:43 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: save the fred - public process should be done Dear City Council and City Manager, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. Here are some questions I personally have around this topic that I would appreciate answers for as well. 1. Golf is on the rise for the 5 —17 years old. Parents are rethinking football, hockey, and sports that can cause concussions, Edina is all about families and supporting our youth. Fred Richards could become a significant destination to reach this age group. What would it take to make Fred Richards address this growing need? If not Fred Richards, what is going to replace it in Edina? Will the updated Braemar Golf course update these needs? And how will that be accomplished? 2. The Golf Association is looking to change the game to have it be shorter in length, not as difficult to appeal to more youth and people in general. Is this really the time we should be dumping the Fred? Or how will this need to be addressed in Edina? Will the updated Braemar Golf course update these needs ?.Again, how? In addition, it is very important to remember that baby boomers will drive the game of golf for the next two decades as well. Baby Boomers are just starting to retire. And from my understanding, Fred Richard's target market is for youth and seniors. I have heard grandparents take their kids to the Fred to share a game of golf together. If not Fred Richards, what is going to replace it in Edina ?, 4. When taking away public land for residents, the process should be fair and open and residents should be able to understand the options. E.g. hold work sessions for open and honest dialogue, to really get the facts, survey residents electronically through City Extra as it is easy enough to do, have a vote electronically. As residents, we should at least know what would it take to keep Fred Richard's open and if not, what is going to replace it before you take it away. Will it remain a green space, or what are the options on the table? 5. Especially in this kind of matter when the city is a fully developed city, the City needs to think really long and hard in taking away public spaces from residents, especially when in all essence it is a park for shared enjoyment. Once it is gone, there is no going back. 6. How is the Fred any different than any of the other Parks in Edina? Could it be added to the Edina Park system? The other parks are not bringing in profits either, e.g. ice skating rinks, which is seasonal also, hire high schools students every year to sit in the warming houses, paying thousands of dollars, when I don't always see a lot of skaters. But I do want to continue to offer ice skating to residents. How does this compare to the cost /usage of Fred Richards in comparison the skating rinks seasonal cost budget? Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf. Have work sessions for interested residents so we can have good honest dialogue. Residents are reasonable and once we understand the facts, then we can make smarter decisions together. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards until the residents requests and questions are answered. I also would greatly appreciate answers to my questions too. Thanks! Barbara Hoganson 5724 Duncan Lane, Edina MN 55436 952 - 926 -9190 2 Heather Branigin From: fizwill @juno.com Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 12:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Executive Course My name is Bill Hanson. I live at 7457 West Shore Drive in Edina. I have been at this address for nearly 28 years and have a direct interest in the fate of the Fred Richards Executive Course as my house abuts the narrowest part of the property very near the west end. There seems to be a race to make a decision on whether the property should remain as a golf course, or to repurpose the property to some other public use, such as a park. While there may be a good argument for closing the golf course from a purely financial standpoint, there has not been adequate acknowledgement and consideration of the many positive elements that the golf course brings to the community, no has there been adequate acknowledgement and consideration of the negative impact of the closure on the value of adjoining properties. To the neighbors of the golf course at least, it feels as though a very deliberate choice was made on the part of both the city and the park and recreation department to come to a decision regarding the future of Fred Richards Executive Course without due interest or consideration of our concerns. According to the staff report/recommendation, the staff has been working on the'proposal since Spring /Summer 2013, yet the first chance for neighborhood input only came with the January 30- informational meeting at Braemar when the draft proposal was presented. The final presentation to the Park Board was less than two weeks later, and the same proposal is to be presented to the City Council on March 4, just three weeks later. There have been published comments by city officials questioning why residents are concerned about various aspects of the issue when no decision has been made, and even expressing irritation about how these rumors get started. Rumors stem from a lack of transparency, evidenced by the very late opportunity to provide input from those most directly concerned. Surely the final decision on whether to close Fred Richards Executive Course should at least satisfy the entire community that due consideration has been afforded to all aspects of this proposal. At the end of this process I understand and accept that I may be unhappy with the results, but I hope that I will not feel that the neighborhood concerns were ignored. Respectfully, Bill Hanson 7457 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 952.929.2568 Heather Branigin From: Tim Nord <tigertees @hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 12:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Investing in Braemar Good Morning City Council, Park.Board, Mayor and staff, I'm writing to express my support of a decision to move forward with the recommendations of the Park Board to Invest and consolidate the Golfing Enterprise of Edina. This opinion comes from an avid golfer who left Braemar years ago due to below average course conditions. I choose to spend my dollars at any number of other public facilities where course conditions, practice facilities, customer service, etc. were far superior. For me, It was worth it to travel farther to find what l considered to be money well spent. It goes without saying that from a financial standpoint, supporting and maintaining the current quantity of golf holes in Edina has been a strain. The numbers regarding revenues and golf participation don't lie and the resulting inability to invest in your product is evident. I will say that 2 years ago I was convinced to comeback to Braemar. While conditions have improved all we are doing right now is maintaining average. (I have to give kudos to Braemar maintenance staff for working miracles with their limited budget and lack of staff. Their budget does not allow forthe man hours needed to operate equipment to improve the condition and consistency of the greens which was provided to them by the Braemar Mens club! 11) If we want something better, something that will encourage repeat patronage of our facilities, investment is needed. How we go about making that investment is above my pay grade and I do feel bad for the folks in the Cornelia neighborhood. But it seems to me that consolidating your efforts, and focusing your resources, on the Mothership is smart business. Given the state of golf in the Twin Cities, and given the fact that there are really no other facilities within 10 -15 miles in any direction that could hold a candle to a New and Improved Braemar, the timing for your investments couldn't be better. Thank you for your time, Tim Nord Edina, MN Heather Branigin From: David Mooty <David @continentalgolf.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02,2014'2:19 PM To: Edina Mail;jonibennetl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.net; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: John.Stang @genmills.com; akellar234 @comcast.net Subject: Letter regarding the proposal for Fred Richards and .Braemar golf courses Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, My name is David Mooty. I will be out of town on March 4th and am submitting this letter in lieu of oral remarks. I spent the first 30 years of my life as a resident of Edina. I grew up playing golf in the early 1960's at the then Normandale.golf course (now-Fred Richards). I have played many rounds of golf at Braemar golf course, where I also worked for three summers during my college years. I am a passionate golfer and, given my golf history in Edina, very much want both the Fred Richards and Braemar golf operations to be successful. After .a 15 year career as an.attorney, I became President of a golf course management and acquisition company,. Continental Golf Corporation, which managed 20 golf courses throughout the United States. I have been the owner of Prestwick Golf Club in Woodbury, Minnesota since 1996 and served as a board member of the Midwest Golf Course Owners' Association, the Explore Minnesota Golf Association and the Fairway Foundation. I have read many of the materials regarding the proposal to close Fred Richards and improve Braemar. I believe there are better options than the current proposal. Fred Richards is a unique property in Edina. It is now relatively hidden within its neighborhood. This quality is both a negative and a positive. The hidden location, combined with an inadequate marketing campaign, has resulted in very few people outside of Edina, and too few within Edina, knowing of the location or existence of Fred Richards. Rounds and revenues have suffered as a consequence. On the other hand, for the youth and novice golfer, Fred Richards is like a cocoon that protects them from the outside world more concerned with pace of play than nourishing and educating beginning golfers. Senior.golfers love Fred Richards, too, and many prefer it to the Braemar executive course. The Fred is an asset that should not be given up without overwhelming evidence, and that is not present under the current proposal. With proper marketing, signage and more focused programming, Fred Richards can become much more profitable than it has been. There are many people willing to assist in this project, and their efforts should be utilized for a period of time to see what can be accomplished. There have been comments made that the Fred Richards property should be a park; perhaps with athletic fields. Given its close proximity to Centennial Lakes, a park seems unnecessary. And, the hidden location of the Fred makes it less than ideal for athletic fields, which can be more effectively located elsewhere in Edina. There have also been comments about the need for water storage on the property due to potential development in the nearby Pentagon Office Park. A golf course is an environmentally - friendly way to treat surface water, and, if more storage capacity is needed, additional ponding would add to the beauty and appeal of the golf course. Braemar's golf complex is in dire need of renovation. -The huge decline in golf rounds in the past 8 years cannot be solely, or even largely, attributed to a general decline in rounds of golf in the Twin Cities' area. For example, Prestwick Golf Club's rounds over the past 8 years have been, steady to increasing, taking out the effects of abnormal weather. I believe a major part of the decline in rounds and revenues at Braemar has much more to do with the poor condition of the golf courses and the lack of substantial, ongoing capital improvements. The Clunie 9 has never been as popular as the original 18 holes and at this time is not a positive component of the golf operation. The driving, range has lost much of its appeal, and the proposal to improve it is correct. The executive 9 has fewer rounds played on it than Fred Richards, even though it is right next to the driving range and is far easier to find. Braemar's original 18 -hole golf course used to be the best public golf course in Minnesota. It even hosted a PGA tournament. Sadly, it has lost its prominence and no longer is on par with the high standards Edina has set for its public facilities. The proposal that I believe is best for Edina would be as follows: 1. Fred Richards remains open and additional marketing efforts are used to increase its profitability and enlarge its outreach to youth and senior golfers. 2. The Clunie 9 is closed and some or most of it is sold for residential housing 3. The proceeds from the sale of the Clunie 9 are used to improve the original 18, the driving range and the clubhouse area, restoring it to one of the preeminent public golf courses in Minnesota. There may even be enough money remaining to build the athletic fields described below. 4. The executive 9 is closed and part of its property is used for an even larger driving range and practice complex than currently proposed, and the balance is used for athletic fields. Braemar is universally known in the Twin Cities as a sports complex, so getting athletes to these new fields would be much easier than doing so at Fred Richards. The result of this proposal is the reduction of Edina -owned golf holes from 45 to 27. 18 holes would be of championship quality that would justify higher green fees for non - residents. 9 holes would be of beginner and senior quality that would serve as a feeder program for the young-and a destination for the older. Both operations would be much more profitable than they currently are. And, the needs for athletic fields and storage for water run -off would be met. I believe this proposal delivers the best results for the City of Edina. Obviously, it would need to be studied by staff and perhaps a Citizen Committee before it is finalized in the form of a Master Plan. That will take additional time and resources, but these assets are very valuable to Edina and deserve that attention. Sincerely, David N. Mooty Heathipr Branigin From: Hammar, Jon <jon.hammar @willis.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 2:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Keep the "Fred" open Dear City Council, All three of n)y kids play golf at the Fred. It's a place where kids can have fun learning the ganie of golf without the pressure of playing at a championship caliber course like Br@emar. My kids would have never strayed with the sport of golf.without a kid friendly place like the,Fred. Please, vote no to closing Fred Richards on `fuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a rnaster plan of the golf r_.ourso s. This process has not been fair or open. Lett: begin the discussion on how we can ul:i,rade. Braemar and k eer) Fred Richards golf course ripen. Thahi you for your consid'-ratior;. Jon R. Hammer, Executive Vice President, Willis Re Inc. 7760 France Ave S., Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Direct: 952 - 841 -6605. Mobile: 612- 310 -5166 ion.hammar(a�willis.com For information pertaining to Willis' email confidentiality and monitoring policy, usage restrictions, or for specific company registration and regulatory status information, please visit http:// www.willis.com/email_trailer.as , We are now able to offer our clients an encrypted email capability for secure communication purposes. If you wish to take advantage of this service or learn more about it, please let me know or contact your Client Advocate for full details. — W67897 1 Heather Branigin From: Chris Chapman .<cf.chapman @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 3:35 PM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: Fred Richards golf course Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Chris Chapman. Heather Branigin From: Bill Cunningham <bandjcunningham @hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 4:04 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Ron Way; Gene Nord Subject: Restoring Braemar I wish to thank our Mayor, our Park Board, and all of the city council members for your consideration to this most important subject. Braemar Park has been home to some of us since the early seventies. We remember the pride that was reflected in the quality of the park at that time, guided so competantly by John Valliere with help from the Park Board. It was a jewel that everone looked to with enormous pride. And then we began to see the pride of this tremendous asset slip away. as other projects began to take priority over this remarkable facility. Many of these projects were'extremely important to satisfy the needs of other members of our community ........... entirely understandable ........... but always at the expense of Braemar Park. The wonderful discussions currently under way are extremely important to not only resurrecting Braemar, but bringing back all of those who have abandon their interest in using this once great facility. Let's conclude a reasonable budget.... and a reasonable time table .... to get this done. It's your turn to give back to those that made so many sacrifices to help make so many other community projects a reality. It's time to remember the horse that got 'ya there. Coordially....... ................Bill Cunningham Heather Branigin From: Dean Mathews Sr. <deansr @marathonfoo& net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 6:31 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Fred Richards golf course Sent from my Wad Begin forwarded message: From: Chuck Carlsen <chuck.carlsen @sol arplastics.com <mai Ito: chuck .carlsen @solarplastics.com>> Date: February 28, 2014,3:13:16 PM CST To: Dean Mathews Sr. <d_e_ansr@ marathonfoods. net <mai Ito: deans r @m arathonfoods.net>> Subject: Re: Fred Richards golf course Dean, Is there an update where I could learn more about the proposed closing? I liked your email and am not up to speed on the topic. Thanks Chuck On Feb 28, 2014, at 3:24 PM, "Dean Mathews Sr." <deansr @marathonfoods.net< mailto: deansr@ marathonfoods. net > <mai Ito: deansr@ marathonfoods.net>> wrote: I urge you to delay any final decision on the closing of the Fred Richards golf course. There has been too little information and too much disinformation disseminated on this subject to date. As an Edina businessman, it is very disappointing to think that important decisions like this are considered with as little substance as appears here. I couldn't run my business this way! Government needs to operate more like business when so much in play can impact their citizens. Dean Mathews Sr. Marathon Foods Office 952 - 835 -5151 Cell 612 - 819 -4073 The information contained in this message and any attachments are privileged and intended only for the recipient names. If the reader is not a representative of the intended recipient, any review, dissemination or copying of this message or the information it contains is prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original message and attachments. Heather Branigin From: Elizabeth Gorman <gormanhome @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 6:48 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Grandview development plans. Hello, I am a resident of Edina and a parishioner at Our Lady of Grace Church which is across the street from the Grandview property. I would like you to know my strong feelings about keeping this public land for public use. Once it is gone into a private development, there is no getting it back. It seems to me that many of Edina's indoor recreation spaces are getting older, and it would be wonderful to use the Grandview property to add a recreation facility to the mix. Also, please carefully consider traffic and parking in any development plans for this area. The combination of the steep hill, traffic and school buses going to OLG, the drive -thru Starbucks (which frequently has cars backed up into traffic lanes) and in general the heavy traffic due to existing businesses along this street already make-for treacherous driving. Elizabeth Gorman 5100 Mirror Lakes Drive. Heather Branigin From: Jan Heirigs <jan.heirigs @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 7:37 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; Swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: March 4th City Council Meeting City Council Members - I wanted to share with you my thoughts prior to the City Council Meeting regarding golf operations at Braemar and also the proposed closing of Fred Richards. I did attend the Park Board meeting last month and I was disappointed by a couple of items that continue to concern me as we approach the city council meeting. I do believe that the review of golf operations and the closing of Fred Richards has largely been handled behind closed doors with little to no community involvement. At the park board meeting a member asked the City Manager if this process could involve community feedback - and quite frankly I was offended by the City Manager's brush off of the board member with his response of "any process could have ". The City Manager has not treated the citizens of Edina with the respect he needs to as I recall he does work for us. His irresponsible behavior of indicated that if Fred Richards isn't closed it will impact our Bond Rating is insulting. I completely understand that we need to review our golf operations and ensure it is something that the city can support - but the full picture needs to be considered including what happens to the land in the event that Fred Richards is closed. No matter what happens to that land - Money will be spent! I challenge the City Council to vote - not to close Fred Richards blindly - I support that the City Council step back and ensure we have the full picture and the community's best interest at the focus. If you close Fred Richards in 2014 and move forward with the plans at Braemar - you leave the 2015 golf season without.-an Executive Course - that impacts all levels of golf - from Juniors to Senior players. People will find other alternatives and not return. I understand that the development of Pentagon Park is important - but again - let's take the blinders off and involve the community (especially those closely impacted) and figure out what the best use of the space is - it may be a golf course or it may be a park or quite frankly something people aren't even yet talking about but let's spend the time and involve professionals as well as the community to seek out options. I read the City Manager's Blog after the initial meeting in January regarding the project, below is an portion of that blog: I think an outside observer might have looked at the people attending the meeting — decked out in their matching "Save The Fred" t -shirts — and called them an "angry mob ". I would not call them that. For the most part, they were civil, even though some of them were quite angry with this whole idea. I would characterize the mood of the room that night as "emotional ". I was proposing to take something away from them that they had strong feelings about. The rationale behind the proposal is relatively cold. I can see why some people would not appreciate my point of view or support the proposal. In fact, I'm not sure that I wouldn't feel the same way if I were in their shoes. First and foremost this is incredibly insulting and offensive to all members of the community whether they attended the meeting or not. To imply that people expressing their opinions were an "Angry Mob" is irresponsible. While I am sure he will hide behind the nuance of - well I said that is what someone might think - the clear undertones are there and inexcusable. Don't we want to live in a community where all voices are heard whether they are in agreement or not. What I struggle most with - is that the City Manager recognizes that people are invested in this decision - but he continues to fail to listen or even seek understanding. It is hard to support a point of view when it is shoved down your throat. I believe the citizens are banding together to be heard and respected. This is a great community of highly talent people and we should be tapping it to make the best decision for the community we all live in. This doesn't have to be "cold proposal ". Now is the time for the City Council to take action and ensure they are informed as well and to not be brushed aside so that one man can execute his only idea. My 11 year old daughter attended the public information meeting in January as we believe it is important for her to understand the process and how an individual can make a difference. She came home frustrated because she felt that no one was listening to the people. It inspired her to become part of the process and actually speak at the Park Board meeting. As a parent, it was a proud moment to see her be brave and express her own thoughts to a large group of adults as that couldn't have been easy for her. Her message was simple - please listen to the community. That is what I am asking you to do now.. Listen to your community as this isn't just about keeping Fred Richards open. It is about making sure we are making a complete and fully educated decision and not rushing to a vote that will leave us half way down a road without a map of where we ultimately need to go. Thank you for your consideration of my thoughts - Please Vote Not to Close_ Fred Richards Now but _to_step back, involve the communitand make a fully educated long term decision. Jan Heirigs 4529 Gilford Drive Edina, Mn 55435 2 Heather Bramf i From: Angie Buyse <iseausk@Vgma|zum> Sent: Sunday, March OI%0l48:43PK4 Ts: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course: March 4 City Council meeting Dear City Council. Please vote "NO" to closing Fred Richards Golf Course on Tuesday March, 4th. I-here is no need to rush tile closure of FnedRicha/nabefore there io public input, puWiudimouSaion and amaater plan of the gclfCourses This processhaonot been fai/o/open, Lmt'mbeAinmediaoosaionoohowmeoaoupg/mde8mamarandkeepFnedRichaujegoUoourse open. Please vote "NO" to closing Fred Richards Golf COUrse. David & An ieBuysa 472Q Hibiscus Avenue Heather Branigin From: Colleen Wolfe <colleenwolfe5 @comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 20148:51 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; josh.sprague@edinarealty.com;jhovland@krausehovland.com Cc: Edina Mail; Scott Neal; john.stang @genmills.com; Derek Johnson Subject: Proposal on Edina Golf Attachments: Edina Golf Operations. Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear City Council Members, We respectfully ask you to review the attached proposal before the City Council meeting on Tuesday, March 4th, 2014 We thank you in advance for your consideration. Colleen T. Wolfe Save The Fred Association 952- 250 -6669 Save the Fred Association Golf Operations Proposal Presented to Edina City Council on 3/4/2104 by Save The Fred Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations Overview: The Save The Fred Association has come together to research additional ideas for Edina golf operations, with a focus on maximizing the possibilities and opportunities to develop world -class golf operations for the Edina community. We explored alternatives -to the current proposal, which we believe underleverages what could be achieved if a thoughtful and carefully crafted master plan for Edina golf is developed. A thoughtful, well researched, and fiscally sound master plan is needed to develop a vision that will sustain the City's golf operations for the next 50 years. The current proposal from City of Edina staff falls significantly short of this objective. Save the Fred is asking the City to detach the closing of Fred Richards from the Staffs recommendations to improve Braemar Golf Operations. Our group is committed to not only saving Fred Richards, but also supporting the long past due and necessary capital improvements to the Braemar Golf Course. These two goals are not mutually exclusive of one another, notwithstanding city staffs position to the contrary. Our respective goals are similar, i.e: providing the absolute best golfing opportunities in Edina for the entire golfing community at large, including but not limited to, beginners, our youth and their leagues, impaired players and their leagues, ladies, men, seniors, work leagues, etcetera. Our group has spent countless hours over the past few weeks attempting to understand the position taken by staff recommending the closing of Fred Richards to the Park Board and City Council. There is clear and convincing evidence that Fred Richard has been profitable and will be profitable in the future. It is our position that the closing of Fred Richards would .be a serious mistake to the detriment of the current and future golfing community of'Edina. We respectfully request the; City Council on March 4th to do three things: 1. Vote to TABLE city staff s recommendation to close Fred Richards Golf Course indefinitely to allow for further study before making an unreasonably quick decision about a long -time treasured community asset. 2. Vote to approve staffs recommended improvements to Braemar with the exception of converting Braemar Exec to Par 3. Direct City staff to work with appropriate resources and residents to produce a master plan for the future of Edina Golf Operations. We believe there are options that should be explored that better serve Edina golf and that are more fiscally responsible than the current list of proposals by City Staff. The following pages share information and ideas that were generated by our group in the short time provided by City Staff. As you read through this document, we ask you to imagine the possibilities to maximize the future of Edina Golf if Council were to pause and ask for a responsible timeline that includes thorough analysis of the facts, extensive public input, and careful consideration so the best decision can be reached. We hope that at the end of this proposal that you will determine, as we did, that the City Staff's current proposal should at the very least be supplemented with other ideas to achieve the best outcome for Edina Golf. VOTE for more time, a better process, and a better outcome! 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 3 City of Edina Fred Richards Closure Decision Timeline City Staff has been thinking about, studying and developing its current proposal for Edina golf for well over a year. City residents had ZERO involvement and, even worse, ZERO communication from City Staff during the recommendation development process. This is an important decision that deserves a better process that will ensure a better result for all Edina residents. ONE month between Staff communication of its proposal and recommended final vote by city Council on March 4th is offensive and not in the best interests of anyone involved. The timeline is depicted as follows: City SbA Consultants :& Developer, Timeline -More than 1 year 2011- NGF consultant roport an Edina golf Ongoing staff and tsundl di —dons on Nine Mile Greek Wail, the Mae Perk redevelopment and potential repo poring of Fred Richnr& 20 13 . MettFullon hired to consult an golf operations City Reeidents - 1 month 2014 City Annmuncco 6 r Edina Golf et Puhlic 4th, 2014, Proposed final Vote on r City Coucil Fred Richards Closure Decision Timeline August 2011— National Golf Foundation consultant report on Edina Golf Operations 2012 — 2013 — Ongoing discussions by council and staff on Nine Mile Creek Trail, the Pentagon Office Park redevelopment project and the potential to repurpose Fred Richards Golf Course. May 2013 - City hires Matt Fulton to review Edina golf operations May 7th, 2013 — City Council Meeting Notes • "There was discussion on the Nine Mile Creek Trail maps and the potential for a change in use at Fred Richards Golf Course in the near future ". August 7th, 2013 — Edina Sun Current Article —"Edina council has not decided future of Fred Richards course" Mayor Hovland Quoted: "If the consultant should recommend consolidation of all of the city's golf operations at Braemar, that will only be one opinion to consider in a thorough evaluation, with extensive public input, of whether to follow such a recommendation." He concluded, `In summary, the council has made no determination with regard to the future of Fred Richards Golf Course and no such decision would be made without extensive public input." 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations October 7th, 2013 - Hillcrest Public Open House on Pentagon Park Redevelopment • When asked, Scott Tankenoff states that he had been meeting with City Staff and Council (in ones and twos) for approximately a.year. • Tankenoff states to those present that City staff had communicated to Hillcrest a decision on the Fred was coining soon. Decision needed because it directly impacts developer plans. • Several mock -ups show development with parkland (Fred closed) and integrated storm water. November 5th, 2013 -At request of residents, Mayor Hovland meets with small group • Concerns expressed, specifically focused on lack of communication or public involvement in process. • Mayor commits to an open, participative and extended process to ensure that all viewpoints are heard and that neighborhood,, involvement is maximized. November 6th, 2013 - Star Tribune article pledging_public conversations with residents (Ann Kattreh) December 6th; 2013 - In a Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal article, Hillcrest developer Scott Tankenoff publically states his preference for an integrated approach with city which would, result in closure and repurposing of Fred Richards Golf Course. Takenoff quote: "There comes a time when we can't wait, are we integrating our land or not ?" December 11th, 2013 - City Planning Commission Meeting_ with Hillcrest • Two plans presented by Hillcrest, one with Fred one without • Developer states preference for integrated approach January 30th, 2014 - WITH ZERO PUBLIC CONVERVERSATION OR INPUT PRIOR TO RECOMMENDATION, CITY ANNOUNCES 6 POINT PLAN FOR EDINA GOLF WHICH INCLUDES CLOSING FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE. March 4th, 2014 - Proposed final City Council Vote CITY STAFF, CONSULTANTS & DEVELOPER = 1 YEAR PLUS CITY RESIDENTS = 1 MONTH 3/412014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations City of Edina Golf Operations: Alternative Models On February 11, 2014, the City of Edina Park board approved a recommendation to close the Fred Richards golf course and invest in the remaining golf course facilities at Braemar. Estimated savings for this proposal was $2,334,400 by 2020. This was the only recommendation provided and the only savings proposal analyzed in depth by staff. As with any critical business decision, several scenarios should have been considered and discussed; unfortunately, this has not taken place. Over the last few weeks, our group of concerned citizens with business finance backgrounds worked to develop additional options to deliver savings at or above the current proposal. The objectives are to meet both the City's goal of improving the City of Edina's golf enterprise and contribute positively to the City of Edina's overall budget. The chart below shows cumulative operating profit for both the Fred Richards golf course and the entire golf operations for the following time periods: 1) 2007 thru 2014 (Fred closure date) and 2) 2015 -2020 (baseline forecast provided by staff assuming no actions are taken). Despite rumors to the contrary, the Fred Richards course has not been a historical driver of the operating profit/loss for the golf operation, and closing the course does not eliminate an unprofitable asset. Fred Richards* +$35,823 +$110,7870 Below are analysis of the current staff proposal and two additional proposals for council's consideration. Please refer to financial exhibits following the options summaries Option 1: Close Fred Richards The current proposal estimates that closing Fred at the end of 2014 will save $734,000 over the next 6 years. This figure assumes almost half of current players transfer over to the Braemar Par 3 (post conversion) starting in 2015. Concerns with this option include the timing of the closure, the exclusion of additional funds necessary to repurpose the land, and the removal of an executive course option (Par 29) for Edina golfers. Despite what the current proposal states, closing Fred Richards after in the 2014 season does not generate any funds for the driving range expansion, and results in both executive courses being closed in 2015 while the driving range is expanded and the Braemar Executive is converted into a Par 3. By keeping Fred open through 2015, lost revenue at Braemar Executive (closed) could be recovered during construction and we can ensure current players stay within the City of Edina golf enterprise and not look to other city courses to meet their needs. 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations This option also does not factor in additional capital required to repurpose the existing Fred course ,(42 acres) into a park and maintain it. These additional costs will far outweigh the operating expense savings from closing Fred and will pull down the total estimated savings significantly to $1,034,400 by 2020. Option 2: Maintain Existine Facilities By keeping Fred open, the golf enterprise can increase the impact of the proposed rate hike and drive additional rounds through increased marketing and new customers from the Pentagon Park development and expansion of Youth Leagues. Fred's additional profit contribution of $646,000 (2016 -2020) will be comparable to the operating expense savings from closing Fred ($734,000). and will not require additional city funds to convert Fred to a park. This option will also ensure an executive length course remains in the Edina golf system. Total savings for this proposal is $2,089,200 by 2020, 2X the estimated net savings under Option 1. Option 3: Keep Fred Richards Open, Close Braemar Executive Course Of the two executive courses our golf operations have today, Fred Richards is played more often, +28,676 more rounds over the last 10 years. In addition, Fred has a landscape better suited for these types of players, and is easier to maintain according to the NGF golf study. Keeping the Fred Richards course open and closing the Braemar Executive course will generate similar levels of operating expense savings and significantly reduces the level of investments necessary for both the proposed driving range/Par 3 renovation and the irrigation replacement scheduled for 2016 at Braemar. It also provides additional space next to the' existing driving range, which opens up additional possibilities to create a "besf in class" practice facility area. Total savings for this proposal is $2,522,600 by 2020, 2.5X the estimated net savings under Option 1. Summa rp• We agree it is critical to invest in our current golf operation, get it back to being one of the top operations in the Twin Cities area, and be good stewards of the City's overall budget. We believe the current proposal (Option 1) does not deliver on these objectives, with the operating expense savings generated from the Fred closure more than offset by future spending to repurpose the space into a park. Options 2 & 3 provide similar direct benefits, reduce the need for significant future capital investments, ensures an executive style course remains in Edina, and accomplishes the goal of funding'improvements to the overall golf operation while contributing positively to the City of Edina's overall budget.. These are just two additional options to. consider. We believe there are others as well that could be generated if time is spent developing a master plan for a world -class golf operations in Edina, which has not taken place. We ask that you explore additional these and additional options to ensure we are making the best long -term decision for the citizens of Edina and the golf operation. 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 7 Fred Richards /Braemar Income Statement O ry C F1 00 a a O �r Pi. .p. g4 o+ sA .p �N V 0 T ,Prl m *++- a a 15=1 �p ='1 oi R 0 c R �S ui°... w `W' VA � u rr. sri v+ *+• V N l0 era. 6�a. v+ ers 2!0 S er+ VA Sri W zn - tr* •i-. vy crs ys vs er. �. Vl �Gl 1�.rar `lpp~�i Tpbp _ 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal O ry C F1 00 a a O �r Pi. .p. g4 o+ sA .p �N V 0 T ,Prl m Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations Golf Operations Options & Analysis ....,...._.._. .._.__..,_..__.,......_......, _. _.,....,. _. .. _._ _. a J N aa C.1 k,a s 0 a OJC yak m C 14 0 n .w cq O O N 1P 3 N M a OY h•S`1 IY a Or ]. 1n ' m C Cn. R a La O O- 01 J al 'rr R m S 2 -� N E d G M a '¢p .J O N c m n a P J n n s y 'PL A F'� c a ^ 1° x a a o a 3 W ul 3 a n T. s mSt CK K q � m 0.3q°r. r� oo y T N x AI T ® 3 Zl C n p J C voo ^ p �p to O iu In fu iu !n V H w a d N O w y O w N O1 O m. W m .� mn ^ Q o e n 4i m p P is ro too n G I gym2 °�nW2 �N.� 0 8 N �J ; g a o °- Q N m y N m J c 3 d J Q n c_ n d �' N N v N AL ry. JN N 0' N C mmp N°' 0 Sri d n pJn 7 O1 m s 3 O o. G I N s a ¢ c i n 031 .3 ry '• N 1 O d. y J yN W N y b g s N d U ii C ro` oaJ m a r A $ m 3a a �• 3 01 3 cl o. n T Ip ano�a o O o . to ° J Et 7 3 n1 8 O m 3 O p u1 n In x n H m 9 d St "'O a U ryrt J rOf' �p 01 n N In .a p M O g •' -- n on J[L D 'w O S OI O C, n pA n S ° n .g n a m 7 ' eo a on 1n a o °- Q N m y N m J c 3 d J Q n c_ n d �' N N N N N N N N N C mmp N°' 0 Sri d N F+ 031 .3 ry '• N 1 O ry. a N yN W N b A d U ii T VI O V 3a a �• 3N C n T S o O 8 n DO 8 O m 3 x n H m 9 d St "'O a U m m N n Q .a p M O g •' -- n z q O m S N 'w O S OI O C, n pA 0� ^q1 on (� p i+ T N y '2 a m a o may; am _S rp G J 4 N m N d Q O o ii N n¢ .y o `. 3 m m W n •U d N N in N 01 -J y n g T n ^ w 0 g o c m �' N •� .'C O : 6 . ^ . m 01 � 1q 01 � Er if m a s c.3 N c n n m 3 c op1a m -- - n N c V. ^ S n 1 N O. O O 00 N N OW1 O �J O {NO O N 00 O S m N rt E M GI 8 }J 0 m 10 0 O w N o o 8 o.g O . � m � 3 U gE Q. m N N c C N cn cn x N N N m S S ry NNO. 4 N ^ N N N n N N ry yi G. J .+ n M c N m I., $ �a a g J �3 a c z O 00 r N N H N 8 8 co a 01' y 1p 3 031 d n m 8 rt x J a N � n � 3 � o N N H Imlf N N O O l�J• D) M E O C N M N. W O N w D1 - M d ; F 0 Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations City of Edina Survey: `Summary of Key Findings Two surveys have been completed in the last few years that have been talking points during the golf course operation discussion. In order to provide open transparency, we encourage reading the full results of both reports and take.all responses into account. Results worth highlighting: Quality of Life Survey 1) These facilities had a high % of responders who have not used them within the last year: a. The Aquatic Center — 62 %, usually profitable in +$100,000 range b. The Senior Center — 67 %, no revenue generation c. Braemar Ice Arena — 68 %, loses roughly - $450,000 annually d. Braemar Golf Course — 58% (play on any of the 3 courses), unprofitable currently e. Fred Richards Course — 76 %, slightly profitable f. Edinborough Park — 53 %, loses roughly - $100,000 annually g. The Art Center — 55 %, loses roughly - $175,000 annually 2) A question was posed ( #45) if people felt we had the right level of Parks & Open Space currently = 91% said about right. 3) People ranked Park and Facilities ( #82) as either excellent (47 %) or Good (52 %) and indicate they are satisfied with what they have and how it's run. 4) 97% feel existing facilities offered meet their needs ( #107). Nothing indicates that people feel current golf or park facilities need changing. b) Similar to above, 99% indicated that the current mix of city park and rec programming meets their needs ( #133) 6) People were willing to pay increased property taxes to fund any improvements ( #129) 7) 52% never bike in the city of Edina and 15% rarely ( #151); but almost all felt that it was currently fairly easy to bike around in Edina ( #152). 8) 70% of the responders do not have school age children or preschoolers in the household ( #186). How can we accurately comment on Fred's lack of participation given we didn't get a heavy response from families with kids who might be using the course? Consultant's Survey Monkey . 1) 86% of those surveyed don't think there are too many holes of public golf in Edina ( #10) 2) 40% of responders are willing to pay $2 more per round, 30% would pay $5 or more ( #8) 3) When asked which services or improvements to facility would make you more likely to frequent Braemar, 48% asked for "well maintained target greens on driving range"; only 11% suggested "the conversion of executive course to a shorter par 3 course" 4) Less than 3% of the responders of this survey were under 18. Makes it difficult to get an accurate picture of the youth golf picture b) Only half of the responders live in Edina. There are inherent strengths in surveys to capture data at a point in time. In addition surveys when interpreted can be manipulated to support any position with the right spin. Our point is simply that City Staff has chosen survey results that support their position and ignore other findings. We present the above for your further consideration. 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 10 City of Edina Bonds: Points of Interest EDINA'S MUNICPAL BOND RATINGS (as of March 4,2014): Moody's: Aaa- "an obligator has EXTREMELY STRONG capacity to meet its financial commitments ". Standard & Poor's: AAA Edina's current Aaa/AAA bond ratings are the highest possible ratings. The city should be extremely proud of this. Outlooks: If Edina were in danger of a downgrade the rating agencies would signal that downgrade. The current outlook is as follows Moody's: NOO (No Outlook). This is very common with Moody's- no outlook given. Standard and Poor's: STABLE. According to S &P's most recent report, they state "the stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's expectation that Edina will continue its strong financial performance with good fund balances given its robust tax base and good management policies. Given these very strong credit quality characteristics, including access to the Minneapolis- St Paul metropolitan area, we do not anticipate changing the rating within the two -year outlook horizon." If Standard & Poor's anticipates that a credit rating may change in the coming 6 to 24 months, it may issue an updated ratings outlook indicating whether the possible change is likely to be "positive ", "negative ", "stable ", or "developing' (meaning it's uncertain whether a rating might go up or down). Or, if events or circumstances occur that may affect a rating in the near term, usually within 90 days, Standard & Poor's may place the rating on CreditWatch. Typically, an updated outlook on CreditWatch from Standard & Poor's includes a rationale for the potential change and the extent of the change, up or down, which may occur. However, updating a ratings outlook or placing a rating on CreditWatch does not mean a ratings change is inevitable. No "negative outlook" has been issued on Edina's bond ratings. Moody's and Standard and Poor's discussion of Edina Golf operations: Moody's: "While both the Golf and the Arena Fund have challenged operations, risk to the city is mitigated by strong revenues from the Municipal Liquor Fund and ample liquidity in the General Fund and alternate funds." Standard & Poor's: The S &P report does not mention anything about the golf operations in their analysis other than a possible upcoming General Obligation bond issue for various purposes "including improvements to an existing driving range ". 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 11 While the city must continue to act fiscally responsible to maintain its Aaa/AAA bond rating, we do not believe that the Fred Richards Golf Course should in anyway adversely affect Edina's future bond ratings. The 2013 operating losses for the golf enterprises of $450,000, in 2013 is 3% of the fiscal 2012 City's General Fund and 1.3% of revenues. Sources: Wikipedid., Moody's Investors Service (City of Edina.'s ratings report dated September 13, 2013) and Standard and Poor's• Rating Services (City of Edirw:'s rating report dated September 13, 2013). 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Maximizing the Possibilities of Edina Golf Operations 12 Summary and Request City Staff has worked for over a year to develop the one recommendation they are asking you to vote on tonight with only ONE MONTH of council review and public discussion. This rush to a final judgment serves no interests well. Not the interests of concerned and impacted residents, 'not the interests of the Edina Golf enterprise or its patrons, not the interests of those tasked with managing the city's assets wisely and responsibly, and not the interests of Mayor Hovland and the City Council. The proposal on the table by City Staff is flawed, not well considered, does not maximize the future potential of Edina golf, and has been developed with ZERO public input. We presented just TWO alternative options that result in a better outcome,for all involved. We believe our proposals are based on sound financial data and assumptions and deserve further evaluation and consideration that only time can provide. Certainly, there are other proposals that also deserve time and consideration by City Staff and Council before a final decision is made. The Braemar Golf enterprise including Fred Richards Golf Course has served residents and patrons well for 60 years. Surely charting a path for the next 60 years deserves a carefully crafted Master Plan and more than ONE MONTH of review and debate. We formally request the City Council on March 4+b to do three things: 1. Vote to indefinitely TABLE city staffs recommendation to close Fred Richards Golf Course to allow for further study before making an unreasonably quick decision about a long -time treasured community asset. i 2. Vote to approve staffs recommended improvements to Braemar with the exception of converting Braemar Exec to Par 3. The rationale for this is explained in our discussion above. 3. Direct City staff to work with appropriate resources and residents to produce a master plan for the future of Edina Golf Operations. We believe there are options that should be explored that better serve Edina golf and that are more fiscally responsible than the current list of proposals by City Staff. The result should be a master plan that maximizes the potential for Edina Golf for the next 60 years that we call all be proud of Thank you very much for your consideration. 3/4/2014 Save The Fred: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Heather. Branigin From: Christine Henninger < Christine .Henninger @genmills.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 9:41 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Fred Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Pro posal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland, Members of Edina City Council, I respectfully ask you to vote in favor of the recommendations included in the attached Proposal at your meeting on Tuesday, March 4. 1 support these recommendations for a number of reasons, but chiefly because I find this situation eerily similar to the Waters Senior Living project, in which City of Edina staff worked behind the scenes with the developer for months before, neighborhood residents had any opportunity for involvement or input. Please take this opportunity to help restore residents faith in your role as representatives of us, taxpayers, citizens, neighbors and friends. Listen to our requests and proposal and hold off on a decision until additional alternatives can be fully vetted. Thank you, Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place Edina, MN SS436 Heather Branigin From: Aaron C Swann <aaron.c.swann @seagate.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 9:46 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_ Council_342014.pdf I think this deserves serious consideration. Regards, Aaron Swann ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Patty <pastang68(ac gmail.com> Date: Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:01 PM Subject: Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED To: ting5813@aol.com, Scott & Denise Dorgan <dmdorgan @)comcast.net >, Dave & Angie Buyse <iseauski u,comcast.net >, past ang6 8 (&mai 1. com, boecheri(2ca6l com, uuirads c7 aol.com, iayneft {c U.com, bsmegrath nmac.com, bho anson(aharderiine.com, ihultstrand cr,comcast.net, aakhtarEwme.com, haseaton0.aol.com, "Kieffer Janna (jkieffer a,barr.com)" <jkieffer(a�baIT.com >, clirich ,comeast.net, dwfoley3 @gmail.com, ellinord@aol.com, beth.klemmensen c gmail.com, dennfamilyc)gmail.'com, d- casey a,live.com, kraigk a,uartine.com, john mcclure <iolin mcclure a,mac.com >, Dale <d4decker(�iuno.com >, csn87 c,hotmail.com, Nicole Slattery <nicslatteryQgmaH.com >, cirosenbacun(c-�'com cast. net, abctravel a,comcast.net, zorba2(.—a,)yahoo.coin, go etemtigersfa�comcast.net, Troy & Lynne Kerin <tldc@comcast.net >, brad.larsonnalliedvau lin.com, castlmsp(ci)aol.com, burley5260(c�.msn.com, gnicholas(a citrussystems.com, aamn.c.swann c.,seagate.com, adamdodd2003(i�yahoo.com, Natalie Dousette <natal*edousette(�yahoo.com >, l:enzie.wolfe�t)gmail.com, frozennorthl23(awahoo.com, cote.bob(a�comcast.net, hunzelmanncomcast. net, Tracy Illies <illiesfamilyngmail . com >, iohns590!u).umnxclu, Sandi and Toni DeBoom <deboomsn`q.com >, aalvero12na il.co»i, dorcty @)..gmail.com, ebrunurn,cniisellsolutions.com, ern rick iollnson ci msn.com, marchartfamilv5(cT )iiiail.com, cmmcelrath(iricomcast.net, Kari & Bart Fialling <hallin rt�Y0t.),gmaiI.con> >, and ytuckerI06D.comcast .net, cindymurphy(i),me.com, arntsen(acomcast.net, ctima eanalysis(a)�,,mail.com, jack.stang(c`�.Iiotmail.com, krupa&comcast.net, fi•anzsr cilaol.com, lukeeids e,comcast.net, ilharmening(wahoo.com, jay .carroll@sequelresponse.coin, cboettcher a,comcast.net, brian.foPilberg_a,cbre.com, barbb loom (amac.com, Jean & Kevin Holm <iholm921 a, mail.com >, dmbotzgyahoo.com, iajbyhnaol.corn, hedolphins@usfamily. tie t, deamik0l a,msn.com, davidlavalle (@ gmaiLcom, johncolernailkelly(c vahoo.com, Andy & Jolene Tucker <iolenetuckerl0ncorneast.net >, danacarl sons mithQgmai1.com, gretchenkritzman a,hotmail.com, brucebodinegniosiacco.com, esmayl 2 gcomcast.net, chrisbraksr)gmail.com, csundin707nlive.com, Mike Olson <butterfat0l a,aoLcom >, jdsabow ,yahoacom, Debra Bly <debra.bl cr mail.com >, gshuster46(c�hotmail.com, colfole 22 @grnail.com, "Cathy Burley (burls6(c�.com)" <burls6(.cDq com >, aenzler graco.com, jhoffinannnq.com, barbara.wolf ),usbank.com, esanderson(c?gmail.com, barrybates @comcast.net, danielle niskaQml.com, John & Deb Wagner <dgwags(iI)aoLcom >, julie.kiddoo(ii)gniail.com, cind erdall.c !aol.com, dgievre0 juno.com, matticu;magenic.com, erik w vanderbiltLouhc.com, bterwilli ieg t�U7(r gmail.com, iol son 7rcumsn.coin, carinjoe a,aol.com Dear Friends of Fred! Earlier this evening we sent the attached proposal via email to Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Our team, with your help and support, has worked tirelessly to produce this position statement and alternative proposal for the City to consider. The proposal is thoroughly researched, carefully considered, transparent, taps into common sense and logic and finally we believe produces a BETTER result for residents and Edina Golf. What you can do to help: 1. Read our proposal carefully and write the Mayor and Council one last email. Attach our proposal, indicate your support, and ask them directly to vote to I adopt our recommendations on Tuesday evening. 2. Forward our proposal to EVERYONE you know and ask them to do the same! 3. Please attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4`h at 7PM in Edina City Hall Council Chambers. Come prepared to make your voice heard by speaking about our proposal and your support of Fred Richards and Edina Golf. Thank You! Your Save the Fred Association Steering Team, John & Melanie Berg Tom & Laura Berzinski Scott and Denise Dorgan Bart and Kari Halling Wayde and Jan Heirigs Paul and Mary Hughes Nick and Renee Hunzelman Derek and Sarah Johnson Tim and Kristi Nasby Paul and Liz Rosenthal Dan and Laura Schleck John and Patty Stang Tom and Michelle Terwilliger Wayne and Nancy VanderVort Colleen and Willie Wolfe 2 Heather Branigin From: David Dickey <ddickey @secondstorysales.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 9:52 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Attachments: Save the Fred.docx Enclosed is a letter supporting Fred Richards. Thank you for your consideration. Dave Dave Dickey CEO Second Story Sales 612.201.0935 Sign up below for our class Everyone Influences: Sales Skills for All of Us https: / /www.eventbrite,com /e /copy -of- everyone- influences - sales - skills- for - all -of us- tickets - 10639582277 Find me at: www.secondstorysales.com www.twitter.com /2ndstorysales www .facebook.com /SecondStorySales http:Hwww.linkedin.com /profile /view ?id = 17879347 &locale =en US &trk =tyah TO: Edina City Council Members RE: Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Council Members: Thank you for your continued service to wonderful community. 1 have lived in different communities in Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Kentucky, and Connecticut, and have been very pleased with our family- friendly community. Family friendly means exceptional schools, effective infrastructure, and unique facilities. Fred Richards Golf Course is one of the unique facilities that differentiates Edina from other local communities. Few courses are affordable, available for a speedy round, and allow children the opportunity to play. I know this well, as both my daughters have learned the game of golf at Fred Richards. I hope my sons will get the chance too. While you may be thinking that the financial performance of Fred Richards makes this a logical expense reduction, think of the families and the number of children who will be impacted. More importantly, think of how this will affect the competitive advantage with families. Thank you for your consideration. David R. Dickey 5021 Yvonne Terrace Edina, MN 55436 P.S. I've enclosed notes below from my sons too. Dear Leaders: Closing Fred Richards won't be good for kids. It is the place we can play. We can't play in other places. Golf won't be fun anymore if we have to play harder courses. if it stays open, I'm going to play it with my Dad this Summer. I hope I can. Josh Dickey, age 7 near City Council: I've only been to Fred Richards once. I hope to go again with my buddies. I am only 9 years old, so I can only play at Fred Richards. If you shut this down, I can't play Braemar for another 3 years and I love to play golf. If Tiger Woods was from Edina, he would have started at Fred Richards. Please don't close it. Jack Dickey, age 9 Heather Branigin From: Katie Dickey <katiepd8 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 10:29 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Hello - My name is Katie Dickey and I'm 14 years old. I grew up playing on Fred Richards golf course. I learned how to play golf at that course. Tearing it down would take away the one place where I can relive my memories. Tearing it down would be not be beneficial in these ways... -Kids will stop playing because they won't ever learn the game - you will lose money- most people who are playing at fred rchards are young kids, and they are right now unable to play at braemar due to their ages. - in the next generation, golf will be a lost cause because no kids will play anymore; once they're old enough to play at a course that allows them to play at 12, they will have already chosen their sports, and won't want/be able to take up a new sport. These are just a few of the things that will be needed to take into consideration when deciding to turn this into a sidewalk. Thank you for your time, Katie Dickey Heather Branigin From: Karen Johnson <kbcanoe @aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:12 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council, I strongly urge you to save Fred Richards Golf Course, a true city gem!!! I have waited many years to golf with my children at this great course. They are finally old enough to enjoy this sport. I have read the alternative proposal and hope that you will vote on Tuesday to table the:vote on this most important issue. Public input is crucial in a decision of this magnitude. Please do not rush on such an important decision. Having safe places for young people to be active is part of what makes Edina a great city. Please consider the alternate, well presented financial plan for city golf. Fred Richards is not the loss leader. The speed at which this has been presented, without public input, tells me that this is not being driven by financial loss. There is something else behind this move. Please do not let a developer's needs take president over the long term tradition of building great places to improve the active quality of life in Edina. It is clear that public input and discussion has long been promised on this issue. One month is not "a sufficient attempt to uphold this promise. I expect better. Please table the vote on Fred Richards to explore fiscally sound options. The people of Edina deserve better!!! Sincerely, Karen Johnson 5816 Ewing Avenue South Edina, Mn 55410 Heather Branigin From: Stratton, Matt ^matt.stratton@craig-haUum.onm^ Sent: Monday, March 03, 20147:02AM To: Edina Mail SuKbliect Please vote NOto closing Fred Richards Golf [uume. Importance: High Dear City Council, Please Vote noto closing Fred Richan1son Tw*odayY0arch 41h There is no need tto nuyh <he:bsure of Fred Richard's befbro there is public Input, public discussion and a maotorNen of ihe g0|/couraes� ' oo�� open, !'eyy begin the dmcussionon how wecunupy:ideB/ae�u/ and keo�Fx*o Richards yNf cou�n Thmi�*.e o[ ,hr'-f cn|y go-fmnu/ses |n Edina ihmt a|!owa boys and yidx to |*onnnhout Uht, game .n an easy |a'd beck avd /ux environwanL |[a oiaofa/riy inoxpem*ve� su my oon and Jaogoos/ uun imp/uvs (hex sto|s a� ,hegeu�gsn,e o� go|i rj'an� you in advance for voting io nm[oOsa 1hm VVonmadv/ gullf GoursC' m E4m�. KxN &1ott. Kim, Jake, and K8oddioStratton Residents of Edina for 16 years. 1 Heather Branigin From: Kristi Nasby <knasby @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:40 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4th 2014. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. Thank you! Kristi Nasby Sent from my iPhone 1 Heather Branigin From: Gerald Hulbert <meadowten @aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richard Golf Parks & Recreation Dept, 1 am Edina resident who plays about 50 rounds a year. A Few rounds @ Fred Richards with my grandchildren. I have never found it busy or hard to get on the course. I believe it could be used in a better way as a park. With another executive course close by @Braemar its not a problem! I cannot remember the last time I played the regulation course @ Braemar. 'I have found the staff there to be very unfriendly. The food quality bad and the service worse! There are so many good public courses to compete with they need to do better. Just one example of good business @ Braemar the employees take the best parking spots. Thank, Jerry Hulbert Edina, Mn 55436 1 Heather Branigin From: Ron Way <ron- way @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 914 AM To: Bill Cunningham; Edina Mail Cc: Gene Nord Subject: Re: Restoring Braemar Good note, Bill. Thank you! Ron Way - - - -- 'Original Message - - -- From: Bill Cunningham To: mail _EdinaMn.gov Cc: Ron Way; Gene Nord Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 4:03 PM Subject: Restoring Braemar I wish to thank our Mayor, our Park Board, and all of the city council. members for your consideration to this most important subject. braemar Park has been home to some of us since the early seventies. We remember the pride that was reflected in the quality of the park at that time, guided so competantly by John Valliere with help from the Park Board. It was a jewel that everone looked to with enormous pride. And then we began to see the pride of this tremendous asset slip away as other projects began to take priority over this remarkable facility. Many of these projects were extremely important to satisfy the needs of other members of our community ........... entirely understandable ........... but always: at the expense of Braemar Park. The wonderful discussions currently under way are extremely important to not only resurrecting Braemar, but bringing back all of those.who have abandon their interest in using this once great facility. Let's conclude a reasonable budget.... and a reasonable time table .... to get this done. It's your turn to give back to those that made so many sacrifices to help make so many other community projects a reality. It's time. to remember the horse that got'ya there. Coordially....... .................Bill Cunningham Heather Branigin From: Hauritz, Rick C <rick.hauritz @optum.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:36 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Do not Close Fred Richards Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plamof the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Thank you Rick Hauritz Edina Resident —16+ years Rick Hauritz I Sr. Information Architect Enterprise Data Management, Optum Technology (office) 763.797.4976 ! www.unitedhealthoroup.com Our United Culture. The way forward. Integrity ; Compassion u Relationships ® Innovation n Performance This e -mail, including attachments, may include confidential and /or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e -mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby'notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e -mail is prohibited. If you have received this e -mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e -mail immediately. I Heather Branigin From: Johnson, Scott L - BLOOMINGTO MN <scott,johnson @ml.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:56 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, I have lived in the city of Edina for over 50 years and been playing golf at Braemar for over 40 years. I remember when Braemar was voted the best public golf course in Minnesota in the mid 80's that was quite an accomplishment and a big feather in the cities hat. But over the years since then our course has been slipping for many reasons , it is about time to make the investment in the driving range, practice facilities and necessary improvements in the original 18 holes that will bring the golfing public back and help generate the revenues that will pay for these much needed capital expenditures . I believe If we can improve the whole experience at Braemar the golfing public will return to our gem of a golf course and help make it a top golfing destination again thanks for your time and consideration Scott L. Johnson Senior Vice President - Investments Senior Financial Advisor Merrill Lynch 8300 Norman Center Drive Ste 1250 Bloomington, MN 554.37 952- 820 -1903 Direct 952 -31.4 -8095 Fax Scott iohnson@ml.com FA Website: http: / /www.fa.mi.com /Scott Johnson This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and /or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http:// www. bankofamerica .com /eniaiIdiscIainier. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message. Heather Branigin - From: John Leak <jmcritters @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:09 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Ann Kattreh Scott Neal City of Edina mail edinaMN.gov Hi! I'm 88 years old and I no longer actively participate in sports, including golf, but I grew up enjoying the facilities of Powderhorn Park and Nicollet Field in Minneapolis and eventually played on high school and college teams. I also officiated hockey and football games for over 20 years. I have been following the challenges of Edina's golf courses and would much appreciate you reading my thoughts. - some of which may have been considered but I am not aware of. Thank you. Why is it only golfers, swimmers and indoor skaters /hockey players that use facilities that must be self - supporing? It certainly costs much tax payers' money to maintain fields and parks for little kids swinging and sliding on fun equipment, the many fields for softball /baseball, football /soccer /lacrosse, out -door skating /hockey, tennis courts all for "free ". Maybe a certain fraction of taxes should be allocated for the more expensive sports - or even a slight tax increase may be warranted. I know that would be difficult, but it could be "slight" and might encourage beginning golfers. Or do what Minneapolis has done by establishing parking charges so those using the facilities would be assessed at least some amount to help with the costs. The hundreds of cars at these play areas, softball /baseball /football games at a dollar a car would bring a sizable amount of dollars and maybe could be presented to the players that they are helping to pay for their nicely groomed fields. I realize golf participation has been dwindling and one reason has been the time it takes and the oddity of that is some players drive an hour to save on greens fees. A friend and I used to play Normandale (Fred) on our lunch hour because of the convenience of its location. And that location is still ideal and may be more ideal when the Pentagon Park area is completed. There are companies that have bowling leagues and some with golf leagues or just company fun, mostly to promote social opportunities for their employees and with a golf course in their backyard - what could be better? Geographically the location is ideal for the residents of east Edina and I would think an invitation to Richfield golfers should be encouraged also, since their golf course has been taken back by the airport. Kids can walk or ride their bikes a lot more safely in that area rather that the route to Braemar and if mommy is giving them a ride it would take half the time to Fred. (Just as an aside - maybe playground equipment and a picnic area could be added so the mommys with young ones could bring them to Fred while the older siblings play a round of golf, or the spouses of the senior golfers could socialize /picnic during the golf time. This scene is very evident at kids morning games, especially.) Or maybe, the nine hole course at Braemar could be closed and Fred receive those improvements, thereby having courses on both sides of town with the best of facilities. I know publicity has been mentioned but if you close the course before you try the publicity or follow other suggestion, it isn't logical. It would seem better to delay a decision until after this season and after attempts to promote more use this year. I would guess a very small percentage of Edinans even have heard of the course and the Edina Sun is probably not the best medium. Most apartments in the area are security units and usually a few editions are left in the lobby and frequently not even all of those are taken. Maybe a plea to the various Condo Councils to include information about the wonderful golf course nearby would be helpful. Maybe a few of the regular Fred golfing kids would volunteer to distribute 'a flyer fo the houses in their neighborhood. And of course everything is the internet - could Fred squeeze a blurb among sports scores of Edina teams or other programs? Maybe a roster of present players could be assembled and their a -mails and present incentives for them to play more. Braemar is wonderful but to the beginner and geographically Fred has so much to offer and closing it without some venturous attempts to keep it open doesn't seem to be trying to keep players playing and providing good opportunities for the beginners. Golf and tennis and swimming pool activity, as you learned from the Edinborough situation, are the popular activities of my era, and more and more are attaining this wonderful age. And Finally (the word you have been looking for if you are still reading this little epistle) the name. I don't know why Edina names so many public parks after former mayors because after a.few years no one recognizes the names. I suppose Normandale Park will be renamed Hovland Park because he just lives up the hill. But Braemar was named after a small town in Scotland (where golf originated) so maybe, if a miracle occurs, Fred should have a name reference to Braemar. Or geographically Parklawn Greens or back to Normandale or if Pentagon Park has a new name Fred could adapt to it. Just a sidelight: A friend and I attend most of the concerts at Edinborough and Centennial Lakes and they are much appreciated. It would be nice if the programs for the concerts would be available on the last Sunday previous to the new schedule. Thank you so much for your efforts and the challenges you have (from guys like me) in providing the wonderful park system of Edina. Sincerely, John Leak 5245 Meadow Ridge Edina, Mn 55439 952 - 941 -35 Heather Branigin From: Dean Mathews <Deanjr @marathonfoods.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:12 AM To: joshsprague @ediharealty.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail Cc: Yeller; Dean Mathews Subject: Re: Save The Fred Attachments: F2F49247, -3F44; 4BE7- 8198- 551326CA6189,png; Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014[l].pdf To the council members, I've been meaning to write earlier and express my disappointment in the "hearing in February regarding what to do with the Fred Richards golf course. It was a charade of the committee as the decision had clearly been made prior to the meeting. There was no genuine interest in listening to the people who came to express their opinions about the community in which we live and love. As a long time resident of Edina and an owner of 2 Edina based businesses, it's disheartening to see this process handled the way it has been. I have expressed my concern to my neighbors, friends and business associates about having elected officials who listen to the constituents that elect them. If you haven't realized by now, there is a large part of the community that values Fred Richards golf course as a community asset. Please see attached proposal. I didn't hear back from any of you last time and don't expect to this time, but hopefully this time you will take the proper consideration on March 4th and listen to the people you represent by keeping the Fred as part of our community treasures. Dean Mathews CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This e -mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the original sender at the telephone number above and destroy this e-mail, along with any attachments. From: Dean Mathews < deanjr @marathonfoods.net<mailto :deanjr @marathonfoods.net>> Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 7:47 PM To: " joshsprague @edinarealty.com< mailto :joshsp rag ue @edinarealty.com >" < joshsprague @edinarealty.com< mailto :joshsprague @edinarealty.com >>, "jonibennett12 @comcast.net< mailto :jonibennettl2 @comcast.net >" <joni ben nettl2 @comcast.net< mailto :jonibennettl2 @comcast.net >>, " mbrindle @conicast. net <mailto:mbrindle @comcast.net >" < mbrindle @comcast .net <mailto:m brindle @comcast. net >>, " swensonannl @gmail. com <mailto:swensonannl @gmail.com >" < swensonannl @gmail. com <mai Ito: swensonannl @ gmail.com>>, " mail @EdinaMN .gov<mailto:mail @EdinaMN.gov >" < mail@ EdinaMN .gov<mailto:mail @ Edina MN.gov>> Cc: "dd.mathews@ yahoo. com <mailto:dd. math ews @yahoo.com >" <dd. mat hews @ yahoo. com <mailto:dd.mathews @yahoo.com >>, Dean Mathews < deanm20553 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us< mailto: deanm20553 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us>> Subject: Save The Fred To whom it may concern, I was dismayed to read of the:article in the paper this morning about the possible closing of the Fred Richards golf course. I don't personally live in or near that neighborhood, but consider it to be one of the fine treasures that we as Edina residents are fortunate to enjoy. My family has access to many of the finer golf establishments in the area, but Freddie Richards is where my son likes to play with his buddies. It's an easy and low pressure place for these kids to enjoy themselves and I'm happy'that its there for all the kids....not to mention the many adults that find it an enjoyable and comfortable place to play golf Braemar does not offer this environment. It's also more than a golf course as one of the great green spaces in Edina. It's too valuable to lose and I don't see how it could operate more effectively as something else. I'm an almost 20 year Edina resident that has lived in 3 different houses and has had the pleasure of street assessments at 2 of these houses with a 3rd on the horizon. I've also voted to support every financial amendment that the city has put forth. From the article this morning, it appears this is a resource that does not make money for the city. However I understand that this may not be the case. In some of the numbers I've seen such as recorded below, I ask are we being truthful in how the numbers are allocated? The paper today it was paid off this year, so why is there a large debt service column — this will presumably go away. Will some of the numbers allocated hit other municipality expense columns if, the Fred goes away (i.e. FR expenses recorded to Braemar)? I also wonder how the city values the justification of operating the facilities within the city. Does Edinborough make money? Does the Community Center make money? Does the Art Center make money? Does Arden Park, Pamela Park, Normandale Park, Walnut Ridge Park, etc pay dividends to the city? I would answer that they all are valuable assets of the Edina community in which we live. I hope the council thinks of all the people they represent, what this gem means to our city and Aeeps the Fred Richards golf course as what it is today. Kind regards, Dean, Danielle, Cole & Ramsay Mathews 5604 Brookview Ave Edina, MN [cid: F2 F49247 -3 F44 -4BE7- 8198- 551326CA6189J CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the original sender at the telephone number above and destroy this e-mail, along with any attachments. Fred Pti.chaids Revenue Vending I Miwthaneousl Concesson Sale,, Rent G-clIf Cart:: Car, Cart, .& Club per zal.5 Greer, Fe e Sl I ota I Revenes Administrative Expenses (RU WO) Cast of Sale, Personal Ser.rices Conuac-Lual S-eiv-icef Com modities 5430 Administrative Expense., Expenses JB,U 5431) Persanal Ser.,ice5 Conzractuaf Ccrnm.odi�ie5 5431 5430,86431 expenditures Dc-tail Reveilue an-d Exp,eJlses 2007 thiou-oll 22013 2:007 2008 20,09: 101 2011 '2012 2013 preliminary 5S,33X $12,289 $11,775 I5 2,2'44 52 42 519963 S 2 4,38' 7 X23,158 51-3,21-9 3 20-4 9. 7 q- 9 3 7 S9,177 511,456 X13,1 5 0 10,GO 2 S IS 9 R 3 S =,034 S-11, I" 53,864 54,517 S4 1, 'S 3.A 19 �4,029' :,4,933 4, 0 8". -')-16,624 5220,325 17, 7, 52 03.59 5 S17554-2 '51.88550 51-,0,67*11 525s,011 S260,787 .52508_39:5) S -140,7 '9 S2212,017 X227,543 2C {1,935 5S,33X $12,289 $11,775 S 12, 29 1 58,845 S10,240 58,06-1 $43.343 543,651 $4 6. 19L c 1-5146,ASS S44,134 S51.147 536,440 14,722 `14.727 513,430 S13.1-1 39 2 •12,79S 'Sl 5,208 r14,1,2 " ,1,341 $2.421 5=;533 C'11575 S 3,595 $2,101 $5,476 $67,743 $73,068 S 7 4, --- 3, 21 573.493 L.69,_366 578,697 564,103 55 $94,167 $9 410 200-9 7, 5 7 2 $9, T3 SS '5 I , 4 53 6 r 2 .6 2 i~,37 ' S21,670 35 I.466 S2..972- S3,695 `19,984 S20,846 €- (pansas I r EL; =43C. &5431 S 1 81,31S -SI44,343. -5187,239 -5100.46- ,313',.575 $121,,' 15 $113,007 '-. 106,969 c•118,123 5 +114,22.15 I }G -115 5 ;191,318 5194,343 5187.239 5180,462 S1S7AS9 5,192.512 Fred Richards Golf Course Summarf of Operations 2007 through 2013 2007 2009 200-9 210 0 2- 0 11 2.012 2013 7o-al Revenu--. 5',259,013 x260 -c-? $ 2) 393 $2140.329 _',227,543 c11,935 €- (pansas I r EL; =43C. &5431 S 1 81,31S -SI44,343. -5187,239 -5100.46- -5187,4ss- -S92-9-12 -S173'86c FR expenses reccrd---d to Braem:ar (estimate j 5-0,000 -550,000, -50 7 OGG C., Pj Of., 0, -S5, OD 0 -SSO'Orjc FR debt pfircipal & llllera'-A 148,2l `� l -S2467497, -c .-144."'S? -5 `? w Z 5 ?50 S -`5 2, 5 cl 0 C I P, im prc.-vem e nt p - o' e�s Heather Branigin From: Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan43 @yahoo.ca> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:32 AM To: Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinareality.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Subject: Fw: Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Attached is my support for the alternative " Save The Fred " proposal. Thank you for-your consideration Alan Greenberg. On Monday, March 3, 2014 10:08:23 AM, Alan Greenberg <greenberg.alan43 CCDDyahoo.ca> wrote: Thank you all for an excellent counter proposal . Obviously a lot of hard work by many of you. You have my 100% support. Unfortunately I can not attend the meeting Tuesday, but I will send an email to the Mayor and the Council articulating my. support. Correct me if I am wrong, but I believe the Council have the final vote. Do we know who is for /against the initial proposal on the Council? After all we vote them in ( or out). Also do we understand what "repurposing " means? Is the land designated as residential or commercial? Or will it be? Sounds like a developer is already heavily involved. What would a developer gain by closing the Fred? Developing more park land ? ? ? ?? I am very suspicious !!!! Again thank you for all your hard work, and lets save the Fred Alan Greenberg On Sunday, March 2, 2014 9:08:11. PM, Patty <pastang68(cDgmail.com> wrote: Dear Friends of Fred! Earlier this evening we sent the attached proposal via email to Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Our team, with your help and support, has worked tirelessly to produce this position statement and alternative proposal for the City to consider. The proposal is thoroughly researched, carefully considered, transparent, taps into common sense and logic and finally we believe produces a BETTER result for residents and Edina Golf. What you can do to help: 1. Read our proposal carefully and write the Mayor and Council one last email. Attach our proposal, indicate your support, and ask them directly to vote to adopt our recommendations on Tuesday evening. Forward our proposal to EVERYONE you know and ask them to do the same! 3. Please attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4ch at 7PM in Edina City Hall Council Chambers. Come prepared to make your voice heard by speaking about our proposal and your support of Fred Richards and Edina Golf. Thank You! Your Save the Fred Association Steering Team, John & Melanie Berg Tom & Laura.Berzinski Scott and Denise Dorgan Bart and Kari,Halling Wayde and Jan Heirigs Paul and Mary Hughes Nick and Renee Hunzelman Derek and Sarah Johnson Tim and Kristi Nasby Paul and Liz Rosenthal Dan and Laura Schleck John and Patty Stang Tom and Michelle Terwilliger Wayne and Nancy VanderVort Colleen and Willie Wolfe Heather Branigin From: DGRGoody @aol.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:53 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: March 4th meeting Attachments: EdinaGolf0perationsProposal _Council_342014.pdf Please indefinitely delay the closing of FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE More information needs to be considered FRED is the BEST 9 hole course in the area Thank You, Diane Goodell- Roberts Golfer at FRED RICHAR'D.S 1 Heather Branigin From: Lee Azar <leeazar @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Sincerely, Lee Azar 5608 Highwood Drive Edina, MN 55436 1 Heather Branigin From: hunzelman @comcast.net Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:10 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please Save the Fred!!! At least consider some of the options that have been presented to you from the citizens of Edina!! Renee Hunzelman i Heather - Branigin From: John F. Devereaux <Ijdevro @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:20 AM To: James Hovland; Ann Kattreh Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar To the Mayor, City Council and Parks Department: I am a long time resident of Edina - born and raised here and bought my first house here in 1991. 1 have seen Braemar change over the years. I belong to-the Braemar Men's Club and know many players who have left to play elsewhere primarily due'to the condition of the course. I also have friends outside the Men's Club who won't play here for the same reason. We have a wonderful property here — it is rare to be able to play a city course that is not surrounded by houses. But it has gone downhill. The range only has grass for about the first month every year. The greens, tees and fairways all need work, but the bones of the course are excellent. It just needs more care and attention. Obviously that takes money to have that happen. I liken it to a long established restaurant that finds its revenues are dropping. Do you cut staff and reduce the menu? That's not likely to help much. Or do you remodel a little and punch up the -menu with new entrees and try to lure your old customers back as well as some new ones? Far more likely to meet with success. I think you are headed in the right direction with the proposals in front of you. I know it doesn't please everyone, but if that was the deciding factor how much would get accomplished? I encourage you to proceed with the improvements at Braemar. Thank you for your time. John F Devereaux Edina MN Heather Branigin From: Laura Hotmail Account <laura196511 @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:27 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Vote to keep Fred Richards open Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Mayor, Please do not vote on Tuesday to close Fred Richards. As one of the stewards of Edina land use, you have a duty to a more open and accurate discussion with the community using the best information available regarding golf operations and city park land. I do not believe the City Council has the best information available at this time. Please vote to keep Fred Richards open, then we can as a community can collect the best information and data and through that process determine what is best for golf operations in Edina. Thank You Laura Schleck Heather Branigin From: Bob Sedoff <bobsedoff@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:47 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: In Support of keeping Fred Richards open. February 26, 2014 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: I am Bob Sedoff. I live at 5508 Highland Road Edina MN 55436. Mary knows me from our family hosting an exchange student through Youth For Understanding. Joni knows me from my involvement with the High School and Valley View theatre programs. I am writing in support of keeping the Fred Richard's golf course open. Before 1 tell you how I use Fred I want to say that the staff at Fred Richards has treated us very well. Mike. Jack, Tass, and the grounds crew are always helpful and friendly. My mother (now 92), a friend (Sharon now 70), and I (now 62) have played there most Wednesdays for what must be 20 years. They have played together longer having started their league while working together at GE Capital when it was located on France Avenue. We oven have a fourth. And many times enough people for a second tee time... We are bringing in friends and family from Burnsville, Coon Rapids, Minneapolis, Hopkins, and Bloomington. We have included my children and my niece and nephew in these rounds. After golf we usually go to TJ's for lunch or dinner. We have also used Fred to host our annual Hodgins family golf tournament. In July we bring in about thirty people to play in the morning. We have people come in from Toronto, Washington D.C., Seattle, Dallas, and Chicago. The terrain at Fred allows for a mix of skills from 12 year old newbies, a Texas High School champion, a 92 year old great/great aunt - grandmother all to have a fun day of golf together. You have heard this before: The Fred Richards golf course with its flat terrain and friendly staff is valued spot for people of mixed skills to play together. For beginners it is a low key environment great for learning. For old timers it has carts and flat terrain that is easy to stand on. For good players with a short open time it is a place to hone the short game. These qualities also make it a good choice for corporate outings. With the upcoming rehab of Pentagon Park there is a possibility of increased users from across the fence. The Fred Richards course is different from the Braemar Executive course. Both are valuable. The Park Board Meeting mentioned the debt is retired in 2013. The place is paid for, there must be a way to break even on the Fred Richards golf course. Thank you, Bob Sedoff cell 612 - 860 -0538 Heather Branigin From: Bob Sedoff <bobsedoff @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:54 AM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: In support of The Fred,Richards Golf Course Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Pro posal_Council_342014.pdf I am in support of keeping the The Fred Richards Golf Course open. Thank you, Bob Sedoff cell 612- 860 -0538 1 Heather Branigin From: Dennis.Wollan @wellsfargo.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 11:56 AM To: Edina Mail . Subject: No to Closing Fred Richards Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4 "; There.is no need to rush to the closure of Fred Richards before there is significant public input, public discussion; and a master plan for the golf courses. The process to this point has not been open or fair. Let's begin the discussion'on how to upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. There are many in the Twin Cities golf community that play the Fred Richards.course that would not be comfortable on the courses at Braemar. I have attached an alternative proposal from the Save the Fred Association Steering Team that deserves consideration in my opinion. Please vote no to closing Fred Richards. Denny Wollan Collateral Appraiser Wells Fargo RETECHS 7900 Xerxes Ave S, Ste 160 Bloomington, MN 55431 612 - 667 -5038 direct 855- 584 -0155 fax dennis.wollan(a)wellsfarao.com N9307 -01 D This message may contain confidential and /or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. Heather Branigin From: FranzSr @aol.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12;14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred Mayor, City council; We strongly urge you to accept the proposal to halt consideration of eliminating The Fred. We have been Edina residents since 1946. We have grown accustomed to Edina residents being included in discussions on City improvements and or changes that would effect our surroundings. One month discussions on eliminating The Fred basically eliminates public discussion on same. We are totally opposed to your plan and urge you to consider additional options. Franz and Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina, MN 1 Heather. Branigin From: schiv005 @umn.edu on behalf of Carissa Schively Slotterback <cschively @umn.edu> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 12:24 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Cindy Zerger Subject: Email for Mayor Hovland - New Complete Streets Research Report available from U of MN Dear Mayor Hovland, I am pleased to share the Complete Streets from Policy to Project: The Planning and Implementation of Complete Streets at Multiple Scales report. My colleague, Cindy Zerger, and I are hopeful that the report will be useful in your work in Edina, as well as your broader work as a transportation advocate. Our intent with the report is to 'Offer insights for communities as they make the transition from complete streets plans and ,policies to implementation and construction. The report highlights eleven national case studies from a variety of communities and draws on over 100 interviews with transportation planners, engineers, public health staff, elected and appointed officials, advocates, and others. The report focuses on six best practice areas that communities can consider as they explore ways to implement complete streets in their own contexts. The report also includes detailed reports for the eleven case communities in an appendix. The report is available at: http: / /www.cts.urn n.edu/ Publications /Research Repo rts /reportdetai1.html ?id =2336 The Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Minnesota Local Road Research Board funded the research. The report is a publication of the University of Minnesota, with support from the University's Center for Transportation Studies (CTS). Please let us know if you have any questions or if you would like further information about the research. Best, Carissa Carissa Schively Slotterback, PhD, AICP Associate Professor and Director, Urban and Regional Planning Program Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota 130 HHH Center, 301 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN 55455 (612) 625 -0640, eschively(7umn.edu twitter: @cschively Heather Branigin From: roy b burns <roybburns @msn.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:12 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Edina Golf Operations Proposal Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014[2j.pdf Dear Mayor and Council Members, Attached is a copy of a well researched and prepared proposal prepared by city residents that I hope you will consider and approve. As long term Edina residents, we firmly believe that the proposal to close the Fred Richards Golf Course submitted by Edina staff is inadequately researched, lacks any significant resident input, and is short sighted land use planning for a successful Edina Golf Operation I'm sure there are better options than what is included in the staff report. Over the years, Edina has had a pretty good record of City and Resident partnership and transparency, but that is not the case with this staff proposal. Please, approve the resident committee proposal and not the staff one in order to give us the time to work together to develop an option that Edina can afford, as well as produce the quality Golf Operiations that staff and residents and their families will continue to experience. Sincerely, Allene and Roy Burns 5708 Warden Ave. Edina, Mn. 55436 952 - 929 -1560 roybburns(a)-msn.com Heather Branigin From: Andrea Kellar <akellar234 @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:17 PM To: Edina Mail; Scott Neal Subject: Request fir March 4th City Council Meeting Good Afternoon, I respectfully request that I be able to address Council for 12 minutes in order to make sure all points of concern for the future of our junior golf needs are presented and the impact that the current proposal regarding Braemar Golf and in particular, the closing of Fred Richards Executive Course will have on those needs . In order to grant this request, the Mayor stated that other concerned residents would have to cede their allotted 3 minutes to the designated person. Andrea Kellar speak on the impact of junior golf and closing Fred Richards Executive Course. Edina residents who wish to formally cede their allotted 3 minutes time to Andrea Kellar are Anita Leggott, 6 Spur Road Ann Dickey, 5021 Yvonne Terreace Richard Johnston, 4505 Wooddale Ave Katie O'Connell, 4801 Rolling Green Parkway Bonnie McGarth, 4619 Moorland Ave Lee McGarth, 4619 Moorland Ave Alex Christiansen, 4614 Drexel Ave Respectfully, Andrea Kellar Heather Branigin From: Gloria W. Smith <phiglo2 @aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 'Fred Richards golf Coirse As a 30 year resident of Edina and a 30 year tax payer now living in Eden Prairie, I am a senior citizen and play regularly at Fred Richards Golf Course. It is a perfect course for my group, aged 72 to 82, to have a great morning of golf. It is where I take my grandsons to play golf with me ... learning to love the game and be the golfers of the future. Please consider carefully your decision to close the course. It is serving a very real need in.our community that cannot be filled by .a redesigned Braemar. The bottom line is not the only consideration in creating the quality of life that has always defined Edina. We subsidize young people's sports activities, perhaps with an aging populat.ion, you could support senior athletics as well. Thank you for you serious consideration. Gloria w. Smith Sent from my iPad Heather Branigin From: Gloria W. Smith <phiglo2 @aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 2:35 PM' To: Edina Mail Subject: Save Fred Richards We have just read the proposal developed by the Save the Fred Organization and We are in full agreement. There is no reason to destroy an entity that has shown to be profitable and invest it's profit elsewhere! Please study this proposal and make a more informed decision about restructuring Edina Golf. Thank you. Phillip and Gloria Smith Sent from my iPad 1 Heather Branigin From: gnlindberg @cox.net Sent: Monday;, March 03, 2014 3:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: FW: [Countryside Neighborhood] Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED; City Council meeting Tuesday, March 4 7:00 pm Attachments: ATT00001.htm; Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf mayor and city council - -- edina MN - - -- we have lived and paid taxes in edina for 44 years -- we used to play golf at braemar but we find we cant handle the big course or the executive course any more so we play, only at fred richards - - -- it would be disastrous to our recreational opportunities in edina to lose fred - - -- fred is a friendly place for the young and the old - - -- we wholeheartedly support the efforts of the save fred committee and feel it would be a tragic and irreversable loss to lose fred especially as a result of an expedited politically motivated study which didnt have adequate resident input - - -- sincerely - - -- gordon a lindberg 6001 erin terrace edina mn -- - - - - -- Begin forwarded message -- - - - - -- Subject: FW: [Countryside Neighborhood] Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED; City Council meeting Tuesday, March 4 7:00 pm Date: 3/3/14 10:18:52 AM From: "roy burns" <roybburns @msn.com> To: "Ben Walters" <joybenwalters @hotmail.com >, "Bob Haben" <whaben @yahoo.com >, "Gordon Lindberg" <gnlindberg @cox.net >, "NASHJOHNN" <nashiohnn @Rmail.com >, rdronendh @att.net, "stacy abena" <slammom @aol.com >, "Tom Bonneville" <tabonn evil le @aol.com >, "tony abena" <tony.abena @palatinehill.com> URGENT! Please read the enclosed well done golf operations proposal and send a note supporting this proposal (not the one from the staff) to the Mayor and City Council. They're voting tomorrow night Thanks. Roy From: alleneburns @msn.com 1 To: rovbburns @msn.com Subject: FW: [Countryside Neighborhood] Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED; City Council meeting Tuesday, March 4 7:00 pm Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 05:39:49 +0000 From: Christine .Henninger @genmills.com To: edinacountryside @eooglegroups.com Subject: [Countryside Neighborhood] Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED; City Council meeting Tuesday, March 4 7 :00 pm Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 03:16:49 +0000 Please see the e- mail,below regarding the Edina community group which has organized an effort to save the Fred Richardson golf course. There is a City Council meeting Tuesday, March 4 at 7;00 to discuss the proposal Out forth by City Staff and present the proposal attached above. Dear Friends of Fred! Earlier this evening we sent the attached proposal via email to Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Our team, with your help and support, has worked tirelessly to produce this position statement and alternative proposal for the City to consider. The proposal is thoroughly researched, carefully considered, transparent, taps into 2 common. sense and logic and finally we believe produces a BETTER result for residents and Edina Golf. What you can do to help: 1. Read our proposal carefully and write the Mayor and Council one last email. Attach our proposal, indicate your support, and ask them directly to vote to adopt our recommendations on Tuesday evening. 2. Forward our proposal to EVERYONE you know and ask them to do the same! 3. Please attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4th at 7PM in Edina City Hall Council Chambers. Come prepared to make your voice heard by speaking about our proposal and your support of Fred Richards and Edina Golf. Thank You! Your Save the Fred Association Steering Team, John & Melanie Berg Tom & Laura Berzinski Scott and Denise Dorgan Bart and Kari Halling Wayde and Jan Heirigs Paul and Mary Hughes Nick and Renee Hunzelman Derek and Sarah Johnson 3 Tim and Kristi Nasby Paul and Liz Rosenthal Dan and Laura Schleck John and Patty Stang Tom and Michelle Terwilliger Wayne and Nancy VanderVort Colleen and Willie Wolfe You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "EdinaCountryside" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to edinacountryside+unsubscribe@gooslegroups.com. For more options, visit https: / /groups.google.com /groups /opt out. -- Forwarded Message Attachment -- -- Forwarded Message Attachment -- Heather Branigin From: Jmac6001 <jmac600l @aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Dear City Council Members, My wife and I are long term patrons at Braemar, and are extremely supportive of the suggested changes to the Golf course and driving range that will once again make Braemar a premier golf attraction. I am also a member of the Men's Club, and as so, I am a frequent user of the course. Also, I do play other area courses, and therefore have strong opinions about Braemar relative to the competition. The improvements that have been recommended are necessary to ensure continuation of our play at the course, and to entice others to play there as well. Please vote in support of the changes. Jim and Sheran McNulty 6001 Bonnie Brae Drive 952 941 1743 1 Heather Branigin From: Bill Hollway <bhollway6l @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:25 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Consolidate & Invest (Braemar Golf) Dear Mayor and City Council Members, Just wanted to write a note supporting your plan to improve Braemar Golf Course and club house facilities. I have been a longtime resident of Edina and use the park facilities frequently. The outdoor skating rinks, warming houses, and other athletic fields are well maintained. It would be great to have a revenue producing park(Braemar Golf) maintained up to the same standards of the other park facilities. Thank You for your efforts and good luck. Bill Hollway cell # 612 - 483 -3006 Heather Braniain From: Jeff Dykstra < jell @partnersinfoodsolutions.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:44 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett12 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Cc: molly dykstra Subject: We support the attached Save the Fred proposal recommendations that will be discussed at the meeting tomorrow night - thanks for considering Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Jeff and Molly Dykstra 4303 Branson St. Edina Jeff Dykstra e: ieff@Rartnersinfoodsolutions.com m: 952- 221 -8730 Nv: www.PartnersInFoodSolutions.com 9000 Plymouth Avenue N. Minneapolis, MN 55427 PARTNERS maINFOOD IS 0 L u "r 1 0 N S' 1 Heather. Branigin From: james.sparrow @wystar.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 4:05 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards golf course Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Council Member, I support the attached proposal regarding alternatives to the closure of the Fred Richards golf course and ask you to reconsider your decision to close the course and redevelop the land. Sincerely, Jim Sparrow 5301 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Heather Branigin From: Bob Hursh <bobhursh @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:52 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: braemar i am in favor of the golf course plan that has been approved by the park board. I'm very much looking forward.to the long overdue driving range upgrade. last year i played about 30 rounds at braemar. i have played three times at "the fred" in the past ten years. i have resided in edina since 1986 and have purchased a braemar.patron card every year beginning in 1992. I Heather Branigin From: Bob Wick <bwick @comcast.net >. Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 4:56 PM To: swlrt @metrotransit.org Cc: j acobs1956 @yahoo.com; spanoslpcouncil @gmail.com; Edina Mail; sen.ron.latz @senate.mn; rep.ryan.winkler @ house. mn Subject: SWLRT - Freight Rail re -route option through SLP Dear Met Council: Please stop your consideration for re- routing freight traffic through the guts (the residential neighborhoods and right past the High School) of St. Louis Park, and keep it where it is now (through the Kenilworth Corridor). ,I've been a resident of St. Louis Park (SLP) my entire life (54 years). In my "time ", I attended Lenox Elementary School, Central Junior High School, and the St. Louis Park High School. Lenox is now a Community Center; as is Central (although part of the Central building now houses Park's Spanish Immersion School). I've owned a house in the SLP Sorenson neighborhood (very close to both the SWLRT proposed line and the often mentioned many freight rail re -route options for Twin Cities and Western Railroad —TC&W) since 1983. I have attended many SWLRT meetings over the course of the last year or so. At the packed Town Hall meetings at the SLP High School (approximate dates: July 18, 2013 and February 12, 2014), about 500 SLP residents each time clearly and loudly voiced their opposition to re- routing freight rail through the guts of SLP. Most recently, the citizens of SLP vigorously opposed the "TranSystems' MN &S North Concept ". Is the Met Council listening to the citizens affected by their upcoming decision, or are all these meetings just smoke and mirrors and for politics already decided? I was disappointed to listen to some of the elected officials talk at the 2 -20 -14 CIVIC meeting at the SLP City Hall. Hennepin County Commissioner Peter Mc Laughlin says that the "little cities" need to fall in line. How arrogant was that? Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges asks if passenger trains run or freight trains would run on the rail tracks in question. That was a pretty uniformed question. Re- routing freights trains out of the Kenilworth Corridor into SLP will affect the quality of life in SLP. SLP will have an additional 4 street closings (at least two by the high school which has 1,400+ students and teachers attending daily during the school year), will cause additional noise and vibrations through the residential neighborhoods that those trains would run, and will affect SLP's young people. SLP Named One of the Nation's 100 Best Communities for Young People for the 6th Consecutive Time St. Louis Park has achieved national recognition as one of America's Promise Alliance's 100 Best Communities for Young People presented by ING for the fifth consecutive time for its initiatives to help young people. The competition recognizes communities across the country that focus on reducing high school dropout rates and providing service and support to its youth. http:// rschooltoday. com / se3bin /clientschool.cgi ?schoolname = school468 Does the Met Council want to chance decreasing the success rate of SLP High School students? Washington Post's 2013 "High School Challenge" Ranks St. Louis Park High School 3rd in Minnesota and 188 out of 1900 High Schools Nationwide Calculation is based on the number of Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate and Advanced International Certificate of Education tests given at a school each year, divided by the number of seniors who graduated that year. http: / /rschooltoday.com/ se3bin /clientschool.cgi ?schoolname = school468 Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges (at.the 2 -20 -14 CIVIC meeting) noted that schools in Minneapolis, such as De Lasalle and Edison, that are situated next to train tracks and "they're just fine ". Mayor Hodges (perhaps?) failed to note that those rail tracks are over 200 feet from those schools (not 35 feet as is the case for SLP High School). http:/Irschooltoday.com/school468/FCK/­Image/freightletter.pd f I suspect that those tracks (by De Lasalle and Edison), just like the tracks near SLP's Peter Hobart elementary school, are straight, flat, they don't split the school campus, and they don't cross student thoroughfares. And ... if a poor learning environments exist in Minneapolis due to freight trains running close to schools ... it is the intent of the Met Council to create more additional poor learning environments? Re- routing more freight trains close to SLP High School will decrease the safety of students, parents, and teachers. This is just logical. Re- routing most likely will delay people getting to school, going home from school, attending after school activities, etc. The SLP School Board rejects the idea of re- routing freight rail traffic past the SLP High School. http:// rschooItoday. com/ schoo1468 /FCK /Imape /freightletter.pdf The cost to re -route freight through SLP is higher than keeping it in the Kenilworth Corridor. Per the handout at the 2 -20 -14 CIVIC meeting (slide 32), the cost for the keeping the freight rail in the Kenilworth Corridor (with the shallow tunnel mitigation) was between $235 and $250 million. The cost for the M.N &S North Route (without yet factoring in many unaccounted costs — slide 30) was $220 - $240 million. The unaccounted for costs that were documented (slide 30) were: Additional retaining walls, additional right of way, freight track removal, North Cedar Lake Trail bridge, and Xcel Substation cost impacts. A few other unaccounted for cost concerns were raised but I did not note those. The City of SLP rejects re- routing freight rail traffic trough SLP. SLP never agreed to it in the first place. http: //www.stlouispark.org /light - freight- rail /recent- news.htmi The CIVIC already passed a resolution (at its early October 2013 meeting at the SLP Rec Center) to keep freight rail in the Kenilworth Corridor .and to implement the "shallow tunnel" option in Minneapolis (Kenilworth Corridor). The "shallow tunnels" mitigate nose, safety, etc. concerns for Minneapolis residents. The Independent Consultant's conclusion and recommendation regarding water resources (the 2 -20 -14 CIVIC slide #9) says that there are "No fatal flaws with the shallow LRT tunnel design ". The citizens of SLP have clearly stated that they do not want freight rail traffic re- routed through SLP (TranSystems' MN &S North recommendation or any of the preceding suggestions). The School Board of SLP does not want freight rail traffic re- routed through SLP. The City of SLP (Mayor and City Council) does not want freight rail traffic re- routed through SLP. It's probably more expensive to re -route freight rail traffic through the guts of SLP than to keep it where it is an do the "shallow tunnels ". The quality of life and SLP's youth education can be affected by this re -route proposal. Please stop your consideration for re- routing freight traffic through St. Louis Park. Keep the freight rail traffic in the Bass Lake Spur. Sincerely; Bob Wick bwick @comcast.net 4 Heather Branigin: From: benjamin.cavender @usbank.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Council members, I will be unable_ to attend the meeting tomorrow night, but I would encourage you to vote against closing Fred Richards at this time. It is simply irresponsible to close the course without knowing what the alternative use will be and how much it will cost: How do you evaluate.the expected costs and expected benefits of,,a decision, if you only have 1/2 of the equation? And, if there is an alternative use in mind, let's get it out in the open, debate the pros and cons, and make a reasoned decision on the merits. Honestly, I am shocked this has come this far.... This is not how responsible people make decisions. Benjamin Cavender Senior Corporate Counsel, VP U.S. Bank National Association 800 Nicollet Mall, BC,MN -H21 R Minneapolis, MN 55402 Direct: (612) 303 -7366 U.S. BANCORP made the following annotations ------------------=---------------------------------- - - - - -- Electronic Privacy Notice. This e -mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Heather Branigin From: F Hanson <felhanson @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 5:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Fred Proposal Dear Mayor Hovland: I have this afternoon read the proposal produced by the Save the Fred organization. I believe this proposal, produced by a neighbor group that includes numerous business people, offers sound suggestions for retaining the Fred Richards Golf Course, and for supporting Braemar according to Park Board recommendations. I respectfully request that you give the proposal options thoughtful consideration, and that you table the vote on closing the Fred Richards Golf Course. Sincerely, Felicity Hanson 1 Heather Branigin From: John Johnson <jj.landarch @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 6:30 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle ( Comcast );joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail-com Subject: Table the vote for Fred Richards!! Attachments: Edina_Golf_ Operations _Proposal_Council_342014.pdf; ATTOOOOl.htm Dear Mayor Hovland and Council: I am hopeful that you would consider tabling the vote to repurpose Fred Richards golf course until there has been more studies with real open dialogue about other options. Thankfully several of our residents have taken a stand against the process and timing of the proposed elimination of this golf facility. Apparently there is disagreement in terms of the operational expenses and profitability of this facility. For this reason alone, it seems to need further study before going to a final vote. Please look at other options to keep this land in golf operations before closing the door. It would be especially disappointing if this decision was at all driven by proposed redevelopment of the adjacent Pentagon Park. Sincerely, John Johnson 5816 Ewing Ave South Edina, MN 55410 1 Heather Branigin From: Sally Stoutenburgh <sallystout @centurylink.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 7:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Vote on Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, I 'm trying to find the words to fully express the sadness and angst I feel towards those determined to close Fred Richards Golf course. It would be a big mistake and one that could not be reversed. I've never been a conspiracy theorist but now realize the citizens of Edina have been deliberately misled with regard to the condition of the Braemar facilities. If this is really true, someone should be held accountable for mismanagement...and duly replaced. Also, it seems residents concerns and interest have been set aside in order to cater to Hillcrest properties. Is there a hidden agenda behind closing this small course? I would hope not since they have publically said they will build no matter what. Edina has been pushing for a healthy populace by providing many opportunities for beneficial exercise for all ages. To this point, some of my friends who play in golf leagues at "The Fred" have stated they will not transfer to Braemar: They're familiar with it but feel navigating the large facility is too daunting and the nine hole terrain too hilly:, They've indicated they will probably stop playing or find a more suitable course in a another community. My husband loved golf and was on the board of the Braemar's Men's Club. He taught our 6 children golf on Fred Richards and found most especially the redesigned course to be a comfortable and fun challenge. Many early mornings he could be found encouraging and mentoring young players and teaching them proper golf etiquette. A perfect place to do such things. Why kill the goose that lays the golden eggs which will supply new golfers which you so expressly state you are wanting and needing? I think Hillcrest properties could benefit from having Fred Richards remain. It could be an asset to future businesses that will locate in their buildings Previous owners encouraged after hours leagues. I often used to see men in business garb and golf shoes, minus the jackets, playing a round on their lunch hour. Where else in Edina can you do this....and right next door to your place of business? I don't understand why Fred Richards receives no advertising effort or signage. In the past I have deliberately looked for it to be cited on community news. Pretty neglectful I would say. The Edina golf dome was advertised on Fox network a few nights ago in the 9PM hour.. Very nicely done, but last summer while at the Fidelity bank on France Ave I was asked about The Fred. The inquirer didn't realize it was a public course he could use..pretty sad! Zero promotion and poor signage, well below Edina's usual branding standards, is just as responsible for the course's low usage as the current cyclical downturn in golf participation nationwide. Isn't public usage (revenue) what this is all about? It seems private developers are expected to have more than one option when making proposals to you. You, the City Council should demand that from your staff. Please vote NO on this proposal. Sally Stoutenburgh 7449 W Shore Dr Edina, MN 952 - 927 -6915 1. J This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 2 Heather Branigin From: Arlene'Forrest <atforrest @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Proposed amendment to Edina's taxicab ordinance. Attachments: Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12 -315, Edina City Code.docx; Council Letter 02mar2014.docx Please forward this email and attachments to the individuals named below. March 2, 2014 To: Edina City Council -- Mayor Jim Hovland, Councilmember Joni Bennett, Councilmember Mary Brindle, Councilmember Josh Sprague, Councilmember Ann Swenson Cc: Scott Neal, Edina City Manager, Deb Mangen, City Clerk Re: Amending Edina's taxicab ordinance Access to affordable and reliable transportation for an aging population is a concern for many communities. While they want to remain active, many older adults find themselves homebound for lack of transportation. Only 1.2 percent of seniors use public transportation on a daily basis, while the vast majority rely on friends and family for rides. On average, women live an extra 10 years between the time they stop driving and pass away; for men it's 6 years. I've been working with people from a number of social services organizations and other professions to bring a new senior transportation option to the area. This grassroots group has been meeting for over two years, evaluating the existing services in order to select a viable model to address currently unmet needs. As a result, we've established ITN.TwinCities, a Minnesota nonprofit affiliated with ITNAmerica, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to providing dignified transportation for older adults and those with impaired vision. Our mission is to provide a volunteer- based, quality transportation service that is consumer - oriented, community supported and economically sustainable. There are currently 25 affiliates in 20 states. More information about the organization and the community benefits of having a local affiliate can be found at itnamer.ica.org. The ITN model replicates the freedom, flexibility and independence of driving. We will offer rides in private automobiles, not marked vans, 24 hours a day with door - through -door, arm - through -arm service. ITN member riders will pay an annual membership fee and will pay for rides out of their prepaid account based upon the trip distance. There is no income restriction and members can schedule rides for any purpose and as often as they wish. ITN primarily uses unpaid volunteer drivers; paid drivers will only supplement as demand requires. All drivers will have background checks and training to safely assist our riders. Because of the way the ITN is structured, the ITN service falls under some municipal taxicab ordinances, including Edina's. We are working to address this matter in those communities in our identified service area in Hennepin County. I'm attaching a proposed change to Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12 -315 that is modeled after language adopted in other cities as proposed by their local ITN affiliates. We plan to begin offering rides in the summer of 2014 so we thank you for your timely consideration of this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Arlene Forrest Board Member, ITNTwinCities 952 - 285 -2795 atforrest(ab-gmail. com March 2, 2014 To: Edina City Council -- Mayor Jim Hovland, Councilmember Joni Bennett, Councilmember Mary Brindle, Councilmember Josh Sprague, Councilmember Ann Swenson Cc: Scott Neal, Edina City Manager, Deb Mangen, City Clerk Re: Amending Edina's taxicab ordinance Access to affordable and reliable transportation for an aging population is a concern for many communities. While they want to remain active, many older adults find themselves homebound for lack of transportation. Only 1.2 percent of seniors use public transportation on a daily basis, while the vast majority rely on friends and family for rides. On average, women live an extra 10 years between the time they stop driving and pass away; for men it's 6 years. I've been working with people from a number of social services organizations and other professions to bring a new senior transportation option to the area. This grassroots group has been meeting for over two years, evaluating the existing services in order to select a viable model to address currently unmet needs. As a result, we've established ITNTwinCities, a Minnesota nonprofit affiliated with ITNAmerica, a national nonprofit organization dedicated to, providing dignified transportation for older adults and. , those with impaired vision. Our mission is to provide a volunteer- based, quality transportation service that is consumer - oriented, community supported and economically sustainable. There are currently 25 affiliates in 20 states. More information about the organization and the community benefits of having a local affiliate can be found at itnamerica.org. The ITN model replicates the freedom, flexibility and independence of driving. We will offer rides in private automobiles, not marked vans, 24 hours a day with door - through -door, arm - through -arm service. ITN member riders will pay an annual membership fee and will pay for rides out of their prepaid account based upon the trip distance. There is no income restriction and members can schedule rides for any purpose and as often as they wish. ITN primarily uses unpaid volunteer drivers; paid drivers will only supplement as demand requires. All drivers will have background checks and training to safely assist our riders. Because of the way the ITN is structured, the ITN service falls under some municipal taxicab ordinances, including Edina's. We are working to address this matter in those communities in our identified service area in Hennepin County. I'm attaching a proposed change to Edina City Code Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12 -315 that is modeled after language adopted in other cities as proposed by their local ITN affiliates. We plan to begin offering rides in the summer of 2014 so we thank you for your timely consideration of this matter. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Arlene Forrest Board Member, ITNTwinCities 952 - 285 -2795 atforrest @gmail.com Modifying the provisions of Chapter 12, Article Vii, Section 12 -315 of the Edina City Code for the purpose of creating a new category of licensed vehicle called a "Charitable Non - Profit "transportation Vehicle," WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has an interest in ensuring that seniors and visually impaired residents in Edina have affordable and convenient means of transportation and "door through door" assistance where necessary, so that they may access grocery stores, doctors' offices and other locations in the community; and WHEREAS, non- profit organizations can offer these transportation and related services to seniors and visually impaired residents at an affordable rate because they use volunteer drivers and receive donations; and WHEREAS, current public vehicle licensing requirements complicate the ability of non -profit organizations to use volunteer drivers in order to keep the cost of their transportation services low; and WHEREAS, Council wishes to ensure the safety of seniors and visually impaired persons who use these services by imposing certain restrictions; now, therefore, BE iT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Edina, State of Minnesota: follows: That Chapter 12, Article VII, Section 12 -315 of the Edina City Code is hereby amended as See. 12 -315. Definitions. The following words., terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Charitable Non - profit Transportation Vehicle means any vehicle for hire that is used by a local non- profit charitable organization that is affiliated with a regional, state or national non - profit charitable organization to transport persons who are elderly or visually impaired. The Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicle may be owned and driven by a volunteer driver or an employee of the non - profit charitable organization who is not directly paid by riders. Street means any. street, alley, avenue, court, bridge, lane or public place or highway in the city. Taxicab. (1) The term "taxicab" means any motor vehicle, as defined in Minn. Stats. §169.011, engaged in carrying of persons for hire, whether over a fixed route or not, and whether the motor vehicle is operated from a street stand, or subject to calls from a garage, or otherwise operated for hire. (2) The term "taxicab" does not include motor vehicles subject to control and regulation by the state public service commission, motor.vehicles regularly used by undertakers in carrying on their business, or motor vehicles hired on an hourly basis. (3) The term "taxicab" does not include Charitable Non - Profit Transportation Vehicles as defined in this Section. Taxicab driver means any person who drives a taxicab. Heath er.Branigin From: Laura Berzinski <berzinski @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:21 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members: I support the report and recommendations carefully and thoroughly put together by the Save The Fred Association and encourage you to vote to adopt these recommendations at the City Council meeting March 4, 2014. The Fred Richards Golf Course is a great asset to the Edina community and to the future of golf in Edina. I am a life -long Edina resident and have spent my 50 years in the South Cornelia and Lake Edina neighborhoods, The Fred Richards Golf Course is a key component in making these two neighborhoods a great place to live and provides the neighborhoods a quiet, but well used, buffer from the nearby office space. Fred Richards has been the golf course where residents have learned to golf over the years and generations can comfortably play together. I ask that you please do not make a quick decision to close this long -time treasured community course. Thank you, Laura Berzinski 7416 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 55435 Heather Branigin From: Gaylen Ghylin <gpghylin @msn.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Fred Penny and I have lived in Edina since 1971. 1 have been a member of the Braemar Men's Club since 1985. Penny and I play frequently at the Fred. We are very comfortable there, and believe it contributes significantly to the wonderful quality of life we enjoy here. We think it is a gem, and fills a critical role in the Edina Golf Enterprise. Every golfer in Edina should be strong supporters of the Fred because it makes their golf experience in Edina that much more pleasant. At the same time, we believe the Fred should carry its own wait financially. The proposal to close the Fred is an inappropriate rush to action. We encourage the Edina City Council table this proposal, and support the Golf Operations Proposal submitted to the City Council by the Save the Fred Association on March 4, 2014. 1 Heather.Branigin From: Joan Strickler <Joan.Strickler @proquest.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:52 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Andrea Kellar; Strickler, John G; pastang68 @gmail.com Subject: Please Save the Fred Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. Please see the attached recommendations from the Save the Fred Association. We completely agree with Save the Fred's recommendation to detach the closing of Fred Richards from the Staffs recommendations to improve Braemar Golf Operations. The best thing for the residents of the city of Edina is not only saving Fred Richards, but also supporting the long past due and necessary capital improvements to the Braemar Golf Course. These two goals are not mutually exclusive of one another, since the facilities serve different needs. Respectfully, John and Joan Strickler 6204 South Knoll Drive Edina, MN 55436 Home Phone + 1 952 988 9489 1 Heather Branigin From: mendelco @aol.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 10:11 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED Attachments: Edina_Golf_ Operati6ns _Pr6posal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Mayor and City Council Members, We would like to make one final appeal that you vote tomorrow night to keep Fred Richard Golf Course open. You have certainly heard many arguments supporting Fred Richards Golf Course. Please consider the following questions... 1. What other sport can a family of five with children ranging from 9 -16 play together? Golf is a wonderful family sport. The Braemar exeutive course is too hard for our 9 year old, but Fred Richards is still fun for all,of us. 2. As an adult, can you take a client out to play soccer or hockey. together? Golf is the sport of business! It is great-, to develop the love for the game of golf at a young age. 3:, Why would we so hastily close a course that is profitable and paid for? Fred Richards is a great golf course enjoyed by many. With a little marketing, it could be enjoyed by many more. 4.` Why- the rush? A decision to close Fred Richards would be a mistake that could not be undone. We suppport the attached proposal prepared by the Save the Fred Association Steering Team, we are asking that you would also support this proposal. Save the Fred! Thank you, Rob and Nancy Mendel - - -- Original Message---- - From: Patty <Pastang68(a)g mail. com> To: Rob & Nancy Mendel <mendelco(abaol.com> Sent: Mon, Mar 3, 2014 5:36 pm Subject: Call to Action- SAVE THE FRED Dear Friends of Fred! Earlier this evening we sent the attached proposal via email to Mayor Hovland and the Edina City Council. Our team, with your help and support, has worked tirelessly to produce this position statement and alternative proposal for the City to consider, The proposal is thoroughly researched, carefully considered, transparent, taps into common sense and logic and finally we believe produces a BETTER result for residents and Edina Golf. What you can do to help.: Read our proposal carefully and write the Mayor and Council one last email. Attach our proposal, indicate your support, and ask them directly to vote to adopt our recommendations on Tuesday evening. Forward our proposal to EVERYONE you know and ask them to do the same! 3. Please attend the Council Meeting on Tuesday, March 4`h at 713M in Edina City Hall Council Chambers. Come prepared to make your voice heard by speaking about our proposal and your support of Fred Richards and Edina Golf. Thank You! Your Save the Fred Association Steering Team, John & Melanie Berg Tom & Laura Berzinski Scott and Denise Dorgan Bart and Kari Halling Wayne and Jan Heirigs Paul and Mary Hughes Nick and Renee Hunzelman Derek and Sarah Johnson Tim and Kristi Nasby. Paul and Liz Rosenthal Dan and Laura Schleck John and Patty Stang Tom and Michelle Terwilliger Wayne and Nancy VanderVort Colleen and Willie Wolfe PA Heather Branigin: From: Scott Dorgan <smdorgan @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 7:36 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred Richards should be saved as a golf course 1 am writing in support of saving the Fred Richards golf course. Please remove the Fred Richards golf course from consideration of the golf operations improvement proposal. My family has used this golf course for years. Our children learned to play golf on this course and continue to use it to this day. This course serves children and the elderly much better than any golf course at Breamar. The primary reason is it is flat it has a good mixture of distances. It allows for a pleasant round of golf for those that are learning with those that need extra time such as seniors I have seen the proposals and information from the city staff recommendation. I am disappointed in the way they have portrayed the Fred Richards by lumping it into the poor financial situation for city of a Edina golf operations. The city staff's argument for closing the Fred is weak. If you dig into the numbers, it turns out that the Fred Richards is positive in its cash flows and Breamar golf course is not. The bonds are paid off on this course as well. This is a course that is suited for kids. In fact, I think this is the primary issue, The kids are where we should put our priorities first in the city of Edina. I don't buy the argument that we need another park. We have plenty. I also don't buy the city's argument that they want to repurpose the use for this land but are not sure what to do. There is a developer involved for land right behind that golf course and I suspect there is probably something already figured out without knowledge of the city's residents. Leave the Fred Richards as it is now. A golf course that serves the community well. A golf course that could serve the community even better with a little more marketing attention and some junior golf programs. Scott Dorgan 4504 Gilford Drive 1 Heather Branigin From: Amy Gustafson <gustoboys @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:14 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: City Council meeting tonight... Dear City Council Members, It is my understanding you have a meeting tonight and unfortunately, I am unable to attend. I would like to request that you PLEASE listen closely to our community /families. I would like the City Council to hold off on closing Fred Richards. It appears that recommendations have been made quickly and not all consideration have been made for the community. This piece of land is a great asset and served the community well as a golf course and am confident can continue to if there is a better proposal. I also believe there is no need to convert Braemer to another Par 3 but improvements should be made. Please VOTE work with residents (with families) to KEEP FRED RICHARDS. Edina continues to grow with all the new housing projects that have been approved. Aren't we growing in the schools by 20 %? That 20% can and should be able to use FRED Richards golf course! It appears there are other expenditures that we should look to cut. Thanks for your time.. Wellness is important! We need options in Edina and healthy lifestyle choices! Amy and Rick Gustafson 4518 Bruce Ave, Edina 1 Heather Branigin From: Glenn Syvertsen <gsyverts @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 10:29 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: From Glenn Syvertsen, 7250 Lewis Ridge Pkwy.Apt. 216, Edina, MN 55439 I agree with the Countryside Neighborhood Call to Action to save the Fred Richardson golf course at the City Council meeting tonight at 7:00 p.m. March 4, 2014. 1'have lived in Edina since 1970 and have appreciated the availability of this small, family- friendly golf course for people of all ages and skill levels. Unfortunately, I am presently in Naples, FL and cannot attend the meeting to personally express my opinion. Sincerely, Glenn Syvertsen 1 Heather Branigin From: rthompson123 @gmail.com Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 11:15 °AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Robert Thompson, Organization: Homeowner,. Taxpayer Website: Address 1: 4523 Bruce Ave S Address 2: City: Edinaa State: MN Zip—Code: 55424 Email: rthompson]23@�i-nail.com Phone: 952 - 929 -0844 Referrer: othersearchengine Message: Close the Richard's Golf Course. Complete waste of money to continue operation and serious loss of future tax revenues. i Heather Branigin From: Richard Curtin < richardcu rtin @comcast. net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 11:21 AM To: Edina Mail Cc: Bill Neuendorf; Dan.Coyle @kimley- horn.com Subject: Parking Ramp Proposal on Council Agenda today, March 4 Mayor and City Council, As an Edina resident (address below) and as owner of the Salut Building, 5034 France, I support Resolution No. 2014 -18 and the proposal to renovate and update the 50th and France parking ramps and related streetscape improvements. I think an admirable job has been done balancing public and private interests and proposing improvements that will benefit all. I do share Allen Ackerberg's concerns as expressed in his email. We are told that the assessment hearing is the proper place to discuss how the assessment will be made. 1 understand the procedure, but I would like to go on record now objecting. This is something quite new, inserted in the proposal a few days before the last Council Meeting. I am unaware of any earlier discussions. As_ proposed, the assessment of the Salut Building goes up from 3.75% to 5.09% - this is both the assessment and the share of annual costs. By declaring this change, the author(s) have created a new "default" where the discussion is no longer why we should change; the discussion now becomes what is wrong with the new proposal — the effect is a change in historical assessment procedures with the public discussion coming "after the fact" and with the winners (those whose % went down) of the assessment lottery arrayed against the losers in any subsequent discussion. I question the need for different permit parking fees for different areas and I hope we think long and hard about alternatives before proposal to construct additional parking facilities. Thank you for taking the time to look at my comments. Richard T. Curtin 6310 McIntyre Pointe Edina; MN 55439 952- 484 -3348 M Heather Branigin From: Doug Nelson <dnelson @theniinikandaclub.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 11:20 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Mayor Jim Hovland Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Mayor Hovland ! Scott Neal For the future of Edina Golf the Proposal enclosed seems to address, the issues much better than just simply closing Fred.Richards Golf COIp'Se down completely. I wVould encourage the City. Council to slow down and take their tinie before they vote and make a decision they will not be happy with in the future. Yes Braemar needs some improvements to its facilities. I think these proposals address some of those issues. See you tonight. Dohs Nelson 6117 Oaklawn Ave Edina MN Golf Professional, The Minikanda Club i Heather Branigin From: Lisa Nelson <lisanelson50 @mac.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:41 PM To: joshsprague @edinarealiy.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Mary Brindle (Comcast); jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject: Closing Fred Richards Golf Course Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf; ATTD0001.htm Over the last few months, I have seen occasional references to closing Fred Richards Golf Course. Only in the last month did I see any details on it. On the face of it, it seemed odd that Fred was being closed, given that it is Braemar that is losing money. Then, a Sun Current article caught my eye. 'It�inentioned (without much detail) that the developer who wants to re- develop Pentagon Park wants Fred Richards closed, but it was not at all clear what was supposed to replace it and why that was necessary or beneficial. Finally, last night I received a copy of the attached proposal from the "Save the Fred Association Steering Team ". P understand that each of you have received this proposal also. I assume you have read this proposal, as have I. It sounds as if there several pieces to this puzzle that haven't been fully communicated to the public and I now question whether all of the alternatives have been adequately considered and the public fully informed. I urge you to table indefinitely the city staffs recommendation to close Fred Richards Golf Course to allow further study and, in particular, more extensive communication to the public and solicitation of public input. Heather Branigin From: LABjerke @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, March.04, 2014 12:51 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Changes to Golf Operations To: City Council From: Linda A. Bjerke 6600 Nordic Drive Having reviewed the information which you have offered, I have the following concerns: 1. The: figures you cite to support your recommendation to close Fred Richards Golf Course combine the expenses of both Braemar and Fred Richards. This muddies the basis for the argument to close Fred Richards. 2. Fred Richards is a valuable city asset used by a loyal group of patrons. (I do not happen to be one of them) You state " most of the leagues" that currently play here can be accommodated at Braemar. So even at present, there is a shortage of faculties for these patrons not withstanding the possibility of an increase due to marketing and a natural increase as the golf down cycle swings the other direction. It is likely that an effective marketing campaign, directed in particular to school age children could significantly increase the revenue at Fred Richards. 3. If Fred Richards is closed there will be no revenue produced by this property. 4. It is concerning that it appears both courses have been neglected by the city as to routine maintenance and improvements for some time. That is an issue requiring city council attention at another time. Certainly it is more cost effective for the city to maintain both courses with current resources. Improvements can be staged in a cost effective manner. 5. As to the fact that revenues form the city liquor stores are used to support both golf courses, isn't that what they are intended for? These are invaluable city assets even for citizens who do not use them as they add to the quality of life in our community and to property values. Perhaps there are valid reasons to close Fred Richards, however, we have not heard them. Presenting alternative uses for the property may help clarify this. Thank you for your attention. Heather Branigin From: DENA <dtortorelis @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 12:57. PM To: Edina Mail; "Joninnett "; Mary Brindle (Comcast); " Josh Sprague "; "Ann Swenson" Subject: Vote to save Fred Richards golf course tonight! Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear Mayor, Hovland, and council members, I am asking your support to vote today, Tuesday March 4111, for the attached proposal to save Fred Richards golf course: Fred Richards is a great asset to Edina! It should not be closed just because Breamar needs to be improved!! The recommendation to close Fred Richards by City Manager Scott Neal without the residents' involvement or any other plans on such short notice to all of us is offensive!! Golfers of all ages have enjoyed Fred Richards for over 20,years and City Staff proposed public consideration of ONE MONTH. That is hard to believe! Please give this more consideration before making a terrible and hasty decision !! Sincerely, Dena Tortorelis 7441 West Shore Drive, Edina Ik Heather Brariigin From: Harbetwein @aol.com Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 9:46 AM To: bobteese@ msn.com Cc: James Hovland; Ann Kattreh Subject: Re: City Council Meets 3/4 -i - Jim and Ann: My wife and I were Edina residents for 27 years and now live in Eden Prairie; however I have been golfing with the Sr. Men's group at Braemar on, Monday's for years. Someone in your Proshop told me that Braemar was the cheapest place to play in the Twin Cities and for seniors it is especially true. That said it is very upsetting to me that the course is losing so much money. A month ago, I sent some of this information to our team captain. Here are some ideas. 1. Get golfers' credit card and charge them if they do not cancel within 24 hours. Here in Florida, in my league they have my credit card and we have a similar cancellation policy. When my wife played with her lady friends years ago, one would always be late and sometime not even show up. Jf I cannot make my scheduled tee off, 1 will call the Pro Shop and let them know, so someone else can play in my spot. Our Saturday Men's league limits the group to 50 and there often is a waiting list. Unlike the Sr. Men's at Braemar, they match you with different partners every time. Furthermore, we have a "Skins" game where you ,can try your luck at winning some money. It is fun and based on your net score, but I do not know of Edina would allow it. 2. Speed up golf. Remind them to park their cards near the green. A ranger is very important to keep up the pace of play, which is normally quite good at Braemar. It has been only twice that I can remember that it took 5 hours to play — once in FL and another at another MN course. 3. Analyze other golf course rates and raise ours if necessary. 4. Start a promotion campaign — advertising. Is Braemar on Golf Now or other websites that permit a golfer to sign up at Braemar? Do you run advertisements in the local newspapers? 5. Do you sponsor a Youth Golf program? I have 34 handicap and at the age of 77 enjoy playing golf with other that are a lot better golfers. I have two Excel spreadsheets, one for the TC and the other for Naples, FL listing the public courses and the ones that I have already played, so I do have a feel for what I consider- to be a good and bad gold course and Braemar in my mind, does rank high. It is my understanding that many golf courses are closing in the U.S. "More golf courses closed than opened in the U.S. in 2013 for the eighth straight year, according to the National Golf Foundation ". Link: http: / /www.bIoornberg.com/news /2014 -01 -16 /golf- course - closings- outpace - openings -for- e i ghth- straight -year, htm l Here is something that I prepared for myself last year. Five reasons I like to play golf: being outside, golfing with good friends (Sr. Men's .League provides that), seeing wildlife, and hitting an occasional good shot and sooner or later the ball gets into the hole. Personally, I like the Sr. Men pool and have won some money even with a 35 handicap. You do not have to be good —just lucky. The only negative I can think of is that last year, I was in a threesome with two walkers therefore after the drive I would have to try to watch my ball, which sometime I could riot do because the pro told me keep my head down. After hitting the ball, then I would have to take the cart over to the walkers to find their ball. Some of the upscale courses require everyone ride a cart and even others I hear in the.UK require that you use a caddke. Hopefully, Edina will see a way to strengthen the golf program at Braernar. Hope this will help with your decision. Harry Weingartner 8395 Excalibur Circle, Unit E -8 Naples, FL 34108 239 - 254 -9567 e -mail: harbetwein &aol.com MN Address 10578 Estate Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347 952 - 944 =2893 p.s. It is very warin here in FL and I get out once per week to play golf. In a message dated 3/3/2014 8:08:36 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, bobteese @msn.com writes: On Tuesday - 3/4/14 - Our Edina City Council meets and will review the future of Braemar. To express your opinions and feelings about this issue please contact either or both of these officials: Mayor Jim Hovland jhovland(�EdinaMN.gov AND /OR Ann Kattreh AKattreh(@_EdinaMN.gov Let them know... 1)Do you want the driving range improved. 2)D6 you want the playing conditions improved at Braemar: 2 3)What else would you like to see the City Council do or improve at Braemar. This is your facility. Weigh in on this matter. From: bobteese(a-)-msn.com Web: members. bmcedina.com Powered By U =. 3 Heather Branigin From: John F. Devereaux <Ijdevro @comcast.net> Sent: Monday,' March 03, 2014 11:20 AM To: James Hovland; Ann Kattreh Cc: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar To the Mayor, City Council and Parks Department: I .am a long time resident of Edina — born and raised here and bought my first house here in 1991. 1 have seen Braemar change over the years. I belong to the Braemar Men's Club and know many players who have left to play elsewhere primarily due to the condition of the course. I also have friends outside the Men's Club who won't play here for the same reason. We have a wonderful property here — it is rare to be able to play a city course that is not surrounded by houses. But it has gone downhill. The range only has grass for about the first month every year. The greens, tees and fairways all need work, but the bones of the course are excellent. It just needs more care and attention. Obviously that takes money to have that happen. I liken it to a long established restaurant that finds its revenues are dropping. Do you cut staff and reduce the menu? That's not likely to help much. Or do you remodel a little and punch up the menu with new entrees and try to lure your old customers back as well as, some new ones? Far more likely to meet with success. I think you are headed in the right direction with the proposals in front of you. I know it doesn't please everyone, but if that was the deciding factor how much would get accomplished? I encourage you to proceed with the improvements -at Braemar. Thank you for your time. John F Devereaux Edina MN Heather Branigin From: Jerry Knoblauch <jknoblauch999 @gmai1,c6m> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:38 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Braemar Golf Improvements Mayor Hoveland, I have been a 25 year resident of Edina, but am currently residing in St. Louis Park. My comments come as a former resident and an outsider. • If Fred Richards is no longer a golf course, then the Executive Course at Braemar should remain substantially in tact to accommodate the influx from Fred Richards. Only sacrifice one par 4 to make more room for the driving range. The driving range needs more capacity at peak times. However, if the Golf Dome can be open at those peak times during the non - winter evenings, nothing too dramatic need be done with the driving range. This should be financial lly justifiable since variable costs should be low. • Restoring Braemar to its glory of the 60's is the challenge. The following ideas should help • 1. Quality sand in the bunkers. Current sand is too gravelly, tine white sand should be done for maximum appeal. It has been done at other courses around the area. • 2. Reduce some of the bunkers and replace with well watered rough -like conditions around the green. There needs to be some challenge around some of the holes. • 3. Consider one or two "showplace" bunkers, either large, in the middle of the fairway, or something to make them pant of a signature hole. A signature hole should be created to draw players to it. This hole should have some challenge. 4. Utilize the 3rd nine more. It is OK to be challenging. However, make sure that there is a tee box for every level. If golfers play from the appropriate tee box, they will have a better game. Currently some seniors feel it is too challenging. I disagree. The day that it become too much of a challenge is'the.day the executive course should be utilized. Do not make this Nine easier, just create a tee structure to "force" golfers to choose more a more appropriate set of tees. Sorne older golfers do not like to acknowledge that they can no longer play from the white tees. • 5. I have played a lot as a single. Many golfers I have played with feel strongly that pace of play is an issue for them to regularly play Braemar. The Men's club tries very hard to maintain a good pace of play. More aggressive rangering will help with this. 6.. Wet areas. Address traditional wet areas after heavy rains by adding drainage ponds. It adds a bit more challenge. Meadowbrook and Hiawatha did this 10+ years ago. Players learn to play away from trouble. • 7. Make hole 11 a bit more difficult. Shortcuts through the woods should be discouraged. • MARKETING and CONSULTANTS, Although other areas of Edina suffered from customer service issues, Braemar has always had first class customer service. No need for a consultant here, GMs have done a find job. Having a 3rd nine is a marketing bonus, since it can provide 50% more last minute reservation options and walk in options. I realize capital improvements will need consultants. Use local ones if possible. • Don't underprice the course. Push Rate. The frequent user program does not attract the casual user. They will pay the going rate, as will all the regulars and seniors. They can afford it. The Minneapolis Park Board used this same conclusion according to a recent article in the Star Tribune. Use this carrot for non- patron marketing. r Study the Baker Park model.. In the Minnesota Golfer magazine that just came out, they are the Minnesota Club of the year. It told the story of their deterioration in the mid. 80's, and they sold bonds to fund improvements, paying the bonds back two years ahead of schedule. YouTrobably have lost some business to Baker. I hope these thoughts and ideas are helpful in the decision making process, Jerry Knoblauch Xnoblauch999 NGMail.com 2 Heather Branigin From: Joe Langer <joelanger216 @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 201412:34 PM To: James Hovland . Subject: Braemar Golf Course future. I'm probably one of the few who actually suggested selling Fred Richards. After the meeting which "I felt staff was ill prepared for, I became less sure because they had no concrete game plan. As far as Braemar itself, I think the driving range should be improved, but that still does not address the fact it is poorly maintained during the season. They basically do some work in the spring and then wait until fall to do anything else. Good driving ranges need to have sections seeded and:shui off all summer long. The course itself is a beauty and somebody like Lehman could probably advise some tweaking , including the use of some "French" drains where water is a problem. Enjoyed your talk at Braemar and overall 1 think Edina is very well run. Thank you. Heather Branigin From: Bob Falls <bobfalis @comcast.net> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 3:27 PM To: James Hovland; Ann Kattreh Subject: Braemar Dear. Ms. Kattreh and Mayor Hovland, I have been a BMC member for 14 years and have played Braemar for 50 years. In the last several years I have been forced to play elsewhere because of the poor condition of the course and driving range. I know I'm not the only one with this issue. The conditions at Braemar have eroded and it's reputation has suffered. The facility is not up to the standards present at other Edina recreational sites. Please improve the driving range and the course conditions. It would eventually generate more working capital for the city because of increased,use. One has only to look at Bunker Hills and Keller. The time is now. The money will be a well spent investment for the next 50 years. Take care, Bob Falls Heather Branigin From: James <JBJENK01 @msn.com> Sent: Monday, March 03, 20144:32 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Fred Richards - Comments from a Edina Golfer Dear Mayor Hovland: We have met on a few occasions including Ron Way's annual get together. As a long time golfer and member at Braemar. since 1984, I appreciate playing Braemar weekly as well as a variety of other golf courses on occasion. I have watched the course decline in quality in the last 10 -12 years relative to other premier golf courses in the Twin Cities and surrounding area. Braemar is a tremendous asset to the community and to golfers who do not want to drive 20 -50 miles to play a premier course. My personal view is that the decline in play over the last 10 years is heavily influenced by the quality of the course and restoring the course to its past condition will result in many more rounds than has been forecasted in the financials presented in the report prepared by staff. Braemar saves 1 -3 hours of time to golfers who now drive a long distance to play a quality course. The recent policy of allowing patrons who live outside of Edina will also make a difference in the rounds played if the course and driving range are brought back to their prior quality. Regarding Fred Richards, I am disappointed in how this whole matter has been handled. My personal review of the assumptions and financials associated with the decision to closed Fred in 2015 makes no sense to me. If implemented as proposed we will have no executive or par 1course in 2015. My personal analysis of this convinces me that Fred Richards, on an operations basis excluding the,debt payback, has not been a drain on the budget and in fact it has made money over the last several years. The debt is now paid. I also believe it has the potential to compliment the overall golf operations plan from a vision of golf and financial, perspective. In the proposed plan closing Fred Richards will mean 'people who have been playing the executive courses at both venues will be driven to another course and potentially lost as future patrons. It also means the revenue from both courses will be lost. If properly promoted and managed this could translate to a positive profit and cash flow contribution to the overall upgrade program in 2015 and beyond. In any case deferring the decision to close Fred in 2015 does not add any financial. risk to the process and appears to be a prudent business decision. Everyone, including the Save Fred Richards group, clearly wants the council to approve the improvement program. It would be a win /win for all of us if the decision to close Fred was deferred and reconsidered as part of the overall Edina golf master plan that is scheduled to be developed over the next several months. Jim Jenkins <br> Home 952.944.3382 <br> Cel 1 612.799.8045 <br >Email jbjenk0l(a)msn.com <br> Heather Branigin From: Jackie Olson <jackie.olson @me.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:01 PM To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle; joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; Edina Mail Subject: on behalf of young golfers We are writing you today pleading with you to realize that voting to close Fred Richards is shortsighted irreversible decision and one you will regret. Parents in Edina love golf, and love golf instruction for their very young kids, which is something we don't have currently. We have a golden opportunity to turn this course into something even more profitable than it is today! BACKGROUND: Our son Ben golfed with a small group of friends once or twice a week through much of his late elementary school years. Golfing at Braemar or ECC (where we are members) was not a viable option because the courses are too difficult and the other golfers are not accepting of young kids on the course. Here is a picture of him after after his first hole in one at Freddie. Flash forward 7 years — he is now on the Varsity team at EHS and will mostly likely play Division 1 golf in college. In order to love golf - you need to feel successful and Fred has a niche for young and old players. The WILL NOT take their business to Exec - its too hilly and intimidating! Our daughter also plays in the Patty Berg League on Sunday - this is a tremendous program that all would pay more for if they needed to!!. The message here — even residents who have club membership cherish Fred Richards and will play and pay for golf there! IDEA: Based on success in other communities, we should turn Fred into a facility with leagues and instructions for young Juniors and leagues for older folks. There should be instructional options for the little ones but also make it social. Parents in this community have money to spend and are begging for a fun program for kids younger than the one at Braemar!!! Many take their players and money to Glen Lake because of their programs: ( http:// www. threeriversparks .org(parks /glen-lake- golf/glen- lake -golf leagues, aspx) We support pausing and getting creative in order to avoid this horrible mistake. Keep FRED RICHARDS open!!!! Thanks for your time! Jackie and Geoffrey Olson (and Ben, Charlotte and Andrew) 4620 Woodland Rd W Heather Branigin From: Brenda Radichel Quaye. <brquaye @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Fred Dear Councilmembers: I believe the future of the Fred Richards golf facility needs to have public input and an appropriate amount of time for public comment prior to making any permanent decision. Please allow Edina residents to be a part of the decision making process and table the vote called for tonight. Thank you. Brenda Brenda R. Quaye Owner New Era Development & Venstar, LLC 7301 Ohms Lane, #300 Edina, MN 55439. ph: 952- 924 -0212 Heather Branigin From: Dean G.Tortorelis <zorba2 @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:32 PM To: Edina Mail; "Joninnett "; Josh Sprague "; "Ann Swenson "; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Subject: Vote to Save Fred Richards Golf course tonight! Dear Mayor Hovland, and council members, I am asking your support to .vote today, Tuesday March 4th, for the attached proposal to save Fred Richards golf course. Fred Richards is a great asset to Edina! It should not be closed just because Breamar needs to be improved!! The recommendation to close Fred Richards by City Manager Scott Neal without the residents' involvement or any other plans on such short notice to all of us is offensive!! Golfers of all ages have enjoyed Fred Richards for over 20 years and City Staff proposed public consideration of ONE MONTH. That is hard to believe! Please give this more consideration before making a terrible and hasty decision !! Sincerely, Dean G Tortorelis, MD 7441 West Shore Drive, Edina Heather Branigin From: John Erlandson <dickerland @aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course. Edina Council; I understand that closing the Fred Richards golf course is under consideration. I also understand that the main reason for taking this action is an economic one. I would submit that the City of Edina and /or the Edina Park Board has been remiss in not advertising the existence of this course. It is in a rather secluded area, which is one of the nice things about it, but it needs promotion for potential golfers to know about it: A private company regularly takes steps to put their products in the public eye by way of putting signs in appropriate locations, using print promotions, and other forms of advertising, Edina has done essentially nothing to make the public aware of the golfing opportunity offered by this beautiful yet challenging 9 hole course. I would say that if Fred Richards is not carrying its economic weight, the City of Edina has only itself to blame. I believe that it is entirely appropriate at this time to invest a modest amount of money that would serve to put Fred Richards in the public eye for the coming 2014 season. My five grandsons and I love the course and play it on a regular basis. We hope to keep doing that. Dick Erlandson Edina. 1 Heather Branigin From: James Hovland Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 1:56 PM To: 'Richlpete @aol.com' Subject: RE: Braemar 2014 Dear Rich,' Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to Mayor Hovland. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. "= Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1 `F 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 y Ibiunno(ZDEdinaMN.aov I www.EdinaMN.aov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Rich 1pete@aol.corn [mailto: Rich IpeteCcbaol.com] Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 8:54 AM To: James Hovland Cc: Ann .Kattreh Subject: Braemar 2014 Here are some thoughts which require money but if Braemar has lost money in the last four years including $400,000.00 last year it is very difficult to make suggestions to save money. Sixty percent of most business cost is labor so this should be reviewed but good service is a must. Driving Range 1. Better targets for all yardages. 2. Purchase a yearly coupon for a discount on golf balls. 3. Put down a sand base on the hitting area so we do not have to hit off the dirt. 4. Expand the driving range as designed for the past many years. Pro Shop 1. Mary has done a very nice job. 2. You need to insure the employees are treating the customers politely and consider the customer first. A Training Course would not be out of the question. The Course 1. The course is not in the greatest shape as the fairways are very bumpy and some of the greens need work but realizing the winter was hard on the course. 2. Play is slow as people do not play from the proper tees which is a constant problem. 3. There needs to be more toilets on the course. The Dome 1. I commend the City of Edina for rebuilding the dome. Now if the weather would cooperate we could use it. Other activities 1. Attract more such as weddings, tournaments, a fun nine or eighteen shotgun for the public. Golf Leagues The Braemar Golf Leagues male and female seem to continue to grow but prices need to remain reasonable. The Grill It would be nice to expand the selections of food at the grill. The addition of beer and wine is a rice feature. Maybe a special food might night maybe an attraction? Green Space It is extremely important as you know for cities and suburbs to maintain green space as it is easy to destroy these for the sake of revenue. Please help to save green space. Thank you for your consideration. Rich Peterson, Braemar Men's Club Heather Branigin From: Bourget,Katie <KBOURGET @travelers.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:02 PM To: Edina Mail; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com'; 'swensonannl @gmail.com' Subject: City's Conduct re: Fred Richards and Pentagon Park Redevelopment Dear Edina City Council Members, I am very concerned with the City's conduct in the matter of the proposed closing of Fred Richards golf course. I believe you have acted disingenuously to the citizens you are supposed to represent. The real "need" to close Fred Richards is for Pentagon Park redevelopment and the time table laid out by the developer, Takenhoff /Hillcrest Properties. Yes, consolidated golf operations makes sense, but that's the sideshow. I'm deeply disappointed in the Council for not being forthright with citizens of your true intentions for the land use of Fred Richards Golf Course. Fred Richards is public land and we should have opportunity to provide input on how that land is used if it's not a golf course. These decisions potentially impact property values. I don't live in the neighborhood near Fred Richards; however, I'm speaking out because I'm concerned with the precedent this sets for how the Council conducts itself with regard to other green space in the city. Sincerely, Katie Bourget 6203 S Knoll Drive Katie Bourget, CFA I Senior Managing Analyst I Fixed Income Investments Travelers 385 Washington Street I N611 B St. Paul, MN 55102 W: 651.310.7903 TRAVELERS) t.hll'I!,' -r, I( . ;(•i „(I 11.1 t 111 -1 1y Heather Branigin From: hotmail _caa4e5992accf9ce @live.com on behalf of Trina Bloemendaal <kbloemendaal @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:21 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net, Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: SAVE THE FRED!!! Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Proposal_Council_342014.pdf Dear James, Joni, Mary, Josh and Ann, I am saddened to be taking time out of my day to email you. Our family is a strong supporter of Fred Richards golf course. I have an 11 and 13 year old and this is our golf course of choice. In fact, we have never brought our children to Braemar, even though my husband and I both golf there on a regular basis. The reason being that Fred Richards is perfect for our family! There is low pressure for our kids who are learning.. Fred Richards is the course I choose to golf at with my girlfriend when we can steal away for a couple of hours.. It is the course where we meet my parents.and golf with them and the kids. My kids have taken lessons at Glen Lake before because this has the same feel of Fred Richards. However, all of our golf on a course in this area with our kids has been at Fred Richards. My 11 year old son is signed up for his first league this summer- at Fred Richards!With the proposed changes, 1 do not see myself bringing my kids to Braemar. Rather, I see us heading over to Glen Lake and supporting the small golf course feel where my kids don't feel pressured and can be free to learn. I grew up in this community and purchased my parents house from them. My parents did not move out of Edina. They stayed in the community. I think a big thing that keeps my dad in Edina is Braemar. He has been part of a league for many years and has served in leadership positions many times. He believes in community golf. However, when my mom started learning, he didn't bring her to Braemar. They Boll' multiple times a week at Fred Richards. In fact, a Fred Richards gift card is the gift we choose to give him for every occasion because we know it will get used. And when I go in the Fred Richards clubhouse to buy it, they know who Gaylen Ghylin is. We live in Edina because of the great place it is to raise our family. When I was reviewing the excellent proposal, which I have attached, I was not impressed to see whether Edinborough was losing money or how Braemar was doing or what the exact numbers of golf operations are. I was remembering that Edinborough is where we went every Tuesday night for many years to meet our friends: I think of my kids learning to skate at Braemar and I appreciate that we have a great course like Fred Richards, as well as the course I golf in a league, Braemar Executive, and the full course that my husband golfs at. I don't look at these entities separately as a financial decision. I consider the fact that I live in a strong city that has a full package. Please consider the attached proposal and give more time to this decision. Agree to give this important decision more time and consider more alternatives. Let the smart people in Edina look for a way to make it work. Do not let one developer change the way that we live and where we spend time as a family! We live here for the full package. Don't take parts of the package away. I will attend tonight and hope to not be disappointed by your decision! Give this more time to find a way that can work. Sincerely, Trina Bloemendaal Heather Branigin From: Jvalliere123 <Jvallierel23 @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:39 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: City golf operations Dear mayor and city council members: As you deliberate the fate of the Fred Richards course, please consider Braemar's total financial history. Simply stated for over 40 of it's 50 years Braemar was very profitable. In some years the operational profits approached $l million - -this was before revenue bonds & interest payments. The revenue bonds w /interest paid for major facility improvements including the actual land purchase of both Braemar park and a major portion of the Fred Richards parcel (formerly Normandale GC). It is a fact that golf is experiencing a downturn in this tough economy. l have just returned from Dallas and a national disscussion on golfs future. In Minnesota the weather has negatively affected golf playing conditions for the past two years resulting in severe losses,. The golf dome fire was another setback to the bottom line. The dome provided $ 75, 000 -$ 100, 000 towards the arena's debt service in the mid 90's. It is possible that many citizens and decision makers (pk bd) are unaware of this history. Having managed these facilities for over 40 years, I,strongly feel that the wonderful facility at Braemar with its prime location on the 494 strip, and with some much needed updating to the course, can operate in the black. The Fred Richards course, from inception, was discussed at length as being very difficult to cash flow it's debt service (Mr Wallin can attest to those discussions). Braemar paid for Fred Richards course with exception of the closing years. Now the debt is retired and green fee costs have risen, it might very well pay for operational costs. Strong mkt efforts should be made if this path is selected. However, if the recent Pentagon Park developerment is the motivation to "repurpose" the golf course, then we should openly discuss some quid pro quo to improve the golf facilities at Braemar for the $ 3.5 million outflow. The Braemar golfers deserve these considerations. Golf continues to be a wonderful recreational outlet for all ofEdina's citizens and especially for our youth & seniors. I was pleased & honered to serve the citizens of such a great community! Respectfully, John Valliere, Braemar Golf Gen Mgr (ret) Past President Minnesota Golf Association Member, Explore Minnesota Tourism Council USGA Committeeman MN Heather Branigin From: Brian Machart <bmachart@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 2:47 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Please Vote "NO" to closing Fred Richards Attachments: Edina Golf Operations Pro posal_Council_342014.pdf Dear City Council, As a new resident of Edina, I am sincerely disappointed and appalled in how the City has handled the process to review golf operations with the pr.rblic. There. has not been arnple time to review the options and to di >c uss with residents near the Fred Richards Executive . course regarding its closing. I urge all of you as goad �tlblic.sefvants to vote "NO" to tonight's golf operations proposal in regards to closure.of Fred Richards, I agree that Braernar requires in-tprovernents, as suggested in the proposal, however. closure of tho Fred Richards course at the end of the 2014 season" withoul. significant puhl€r.: input, as rt!ayot had said iast August R) the Sun- Current, is not Fjt:ceptabiiF., to t.h rc ;id r;t; of Edina. Please callow for the r.s: >embiiny of a citizen comrrtittee PRIOR to any closing to rove t:igttti o })e€ , +;J:r; t 0 i4 review the attached proposal. Please vote "no" to closing Fred Richards. Regards. Brian Machart 7405 Kellogg Ave 1 Heather Branigin From: tmterwilliger <tmterwilliger @comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 3:54 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast:net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Golf Course Operation Study for 3/4/14 Meeting Dear Mayor and City Council: This afternoon I began reading the Golf Course Operations Study that will be presented to you this evening. I have not completed reading it but in the interest of time wanted to email you with the hope that you will read this before tonight's meeting. There are too many reasons to cite without this email becoming extremely long on why I believe that the decision on whether or not to close Fred Richards should be tabled tonight. Many of these reasons on why your vote should be tabled will be presented to you tonight during public comments. However, I would like to mention a couple of items in the Operations Study that I believe are just a few examples of why more time is needed to study the overall golf operations. On page 4 of the Study the City states that capacity of golf rounds at Fred Richards is 60,000 rounds /yr (same as Braemar Executive). This is significantly different from the capacity number of 35,000 + /.- that the National Golf Foundation ( "NGF ") stated on page 50 of their 2011 study that they performed for Edina (NGF also stated that the capacity for Braemar Executive is 35,000 + /- on page 46). 1 do not know the assumptions that NGF used to figure 35,000 + /- rounds. City Staff's assumptions were based on a.200 day season, 10 hours of tee times, 8 minute tee time intervals, and 4 players per tee time. Staffs assumption that not one hour of time, let alone days or weeks, will be'lost due to weather over six and a half months is entirely unrealistic. Whether it is intentional or not this is just one example of how City Staff is presenting misleading information and using them in their calculations. Another example would be in the second paragraph of page 5 in the Operations Study where it states that rounds at Fred Richards declined 25% from 2009 to 2012 while rounds at Braemar Executive only declined 20% (it actually was 23% when compared to 2,009 rounds at Braemar Executive and not 2008 as the City calculated). This statement is true but it leaves out important information and facts that more rounds were played at Fred Richards during each of these years and that a total of 10,274 more rounds were played at Fred Richards during the four year stretch from 2009 to 2012. Please note that historically more rounds have been played every year at Fred Richards than at Braemar Executive despite the incredibly poorjob that the City has done marketing and promoting Fred Richards over the past many years. The above are just two small examples of why I feel it is extremely important that more time is given to study the overall golf operations and why City Staff needs to be challenged on their ideas and support with detail and facts /reasonable assumptions any proposals that they present in the future. Thank you, Tom Terwilliger 7421 Kellogg Ave. Edina, MN 55435 612 - 7901859 To: MAYOR & COUNCIL From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: March 4, 2014 Subject: Correspondence Action Requested: No action is necessary. Attachment: Attached is correspondence received since the last Council meeting. H Agenda Item #: IX. A. Action EK Discussion ❑ Information ❑ O City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 w Protecting, maintaining and improving the health of all Minnesotans February 6, 2014 Jeff Brown Community Health Services Administrator City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 West 50°i Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Brown: Congratulations on your appointment as the Community Health Services (CHS) Administrator for the City of Edina Community Health Board. Thank you for the submission of your r6sum6 and the additionally requested documentation for the CHS Administrator Qualification Review Process. We have reviewed the information you provided and have determined that you meet the required qualifications for CHS Administrators as defined in Minnesota's Administrative Rule 4736.0110. We would like to take this opportunity to welcome you to Minnesota's community health services system. In Minnesota, public health activities are carried out through a partnership of shared authorities and responsibilities of the state and local governments. The mission of the state -local public health partnership is to lead efforts to protect and promote the health of all people in Minnesota This is accomplished through a combination of state goals and locally identified priorities. The governance responsibilities of state and local government are primarily outlined in Minnesota Statutes 145A, though specific program requirements may be found in federal law, other state laws and rules, or local ordinances. I encourage you to review our communications, to attend meetings of the State Community Health Services Advisory Committee (SCHSAC), and to contact Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) staff for technical assistance in any program area. In particular, we hope you will contact staff in the Office of Performance Improvement with questions as you become acquainted with the depth and breadth of public health activities in your area. Please feel free to contact Becky Buhler from the Office of Performance Improvement at 651- 201 -5795 or email her at becky.buhler@state.mn.us with questions about the local public health system, Planning and Performance Measurement Reporting System (PPMRS) or the legal requirements of the Local Public Health Act. Again, welcome to Minnesota's community health services system. We look forward to working with you! Sincerely, Debra Burns Director, Office of Performance Improvement Minnesota Department of Health 625 Robert Street P.O. Box 64975 Saint Paul, MN 55164 -0975 cc: James Hovland, Chair, City of Edina Community Health Board Julia Ashley, Public Health Nurse Consultant, Metro Region, MDH General Information: 651- 201 -5000 • Toll-free: 888-345-0823 a M.651- 201 -5797 • www.health.state.mmus An equal opportunity employer I i"- I : I cl I L? V tvde IT s d,'s o r Deb.Mangen From: Susan Marty Eldridge <smartyeldridge@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 7:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Grandview Public Land Please let me know how I can be involved, I am in favor of keeping the Grandview land for future public use. THAN KYOU Susan Marty Eldridge Cell: (952) 250 -9528 Work: (952) 920 -9721 Deb Mangen From: Extra Mile America < extramile .americafoundation @yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Thank you, Mayor James Hovland Dear Mayor Hovland, Thank you very much for believing in the power of the "go the extra mile" message and declaring 11/1/2013 "Extra Mile Day." As the Founder of Extra Mile Day, I am elated to report that 444 cities made the 2013 declaration... a major leap over the 23 inaugural cities we had in 2009. As you know, "Extra Mlle Day" acknowledges the power we each have to create positive change in ourselves, our families, our organizations and our communities when we personally go the. extra mile. Of course, it's easy to sometimes feel that our individual voices don't matter; "Extra Mile Day" boldly proclaims the opposite. Whether it is one elected official or one non - elected government employee, whether it is one citizen, one business, or one organization ... ONE going the extra mile does make a difference. I wish you huge success in 2014, and as you plan your agenda, please remember November 1 is a perfect date around which to plan special recognition events. If I can ever be of value to you professionally or personally, please let me know. With gratitude, Shawn Anderson Founder, Extra Mile America (310) 402 -4826 Shawn ExtraMileAmerica.com Deb Mangen From: bporter4339 @msn.com Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 20141:31 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Contact Us form submission Name: Bennett Porter Organization: Website: Address 1: 5120 Halifax Ave S Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: bporter4339@msn.com Phone:6122516371 Referrer: google Message: I attended the city council meeting on 2/18 and would like to comment on Resolution 2014 -18 (50th and France Parking Improvements). The businesses in our downtown are a wonderful asset to our neighborhood and community. As a close neighbor, I love to walk when utilizing the downtown area so others have more access. Many other neighbors do this also. I also support the minority opinions expressed by Joni Bennett and Ann Swenson regarding public money for ramps that are filled with employees instead of customers. We learned tonight that possibly 75% of ramp parking may be used by employees. I believe at least 50% of the ramp parking should be available for customers. Setting this guideline now will establish boundaries for all future discussions regarding public financing of ramp maintenance and any future ramp. Employee parking issues will always exist in city business districts. I am very familiar with parking issues around the 44th and France area where I owned the Westgate Pet Clinic. Employees adapt by moving their cars every 4 hours, if there is a 5 hour parking restriction. Or, by parking in surrounding neighborhoods. They may even consider taking the bus, if we, increase the cost of a parking permit above the suggested $120 /yr. As cars gradually move into our neighborhood to park, citizens will support that the ramps need expansion and that instituting parking fees are reasonable to cover the investment. Please establish a reasonable guideline for this envious public /private partnership now: At least 50% customer parking for public investment dollars. Deb Mangen From: Aaron C Swann <aaron.c.swann @seagate.com> Sent Wednesday, February 19, 2014 4:42 PM To: swensonannl @gmail.com; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle (Comcast);jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Edina Mail Subject Re: [Edina411) Council News from Josh Sprague Josh, I hope your comments regarding enterprise operations serving "niche user groups" does not reflect your view of the golf operations. Furthermore I expect that on March 4th the council will either reject outright the recommendations of the park board to close Fred Richard's golf course or at the very least send the proposal back with instructions to come up with additional options for improving the financial performance that do not include a poorly thought out closure. As has been previously stated, Fred Richards is debt free and profitable (cash flow positive) and is a financial positive for the City of Edina. Regards, Aaron Swann 6710 Cahill Rd On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Sprague, Josh <joshsprague@edinareal .com> wrote: All Here are the highlights from last night's Council meeting and work session: (1) At our work session, we review the Park Board's 2014 work plan, which notably includes completion of a Parks Strategic Plan, featuring an updated community needs assessment (the last full blown park survey was in 2006), as well as visioning and master planning for the entire park system. It also includes a review and recommendation on cost recovery goals for enterprise facilities: at what level do we subsidize these enterprises to equitably and sustainably meet the needs of both the masses and the niche user groups? There are many variables. It will be an interesting discussion. We also discussed a redacted version of the naming/dedication and donations policies, the former of which may involve additional Council discussion as to what type of public process, and what type of waiting period, is appropriate and reasonable. (2) At our Council meeting, we received a formal greeting from our new fire chief Tom Schmitz. Before serving as assistant chief in Eden Prairie, Tom was a long -term employee of the Edina Fire Dept. That makes 3 new department heads in the last 60 days, including police chief Dave Nelson, and city engineer Chad Millner. (3) We approved our annual appropriations of federal Community Block Development Grant (CBDG) funding as follows: $18,700 to public services ($10,095 to HOME, household and outside maintenance services for the elderly; $5,000 to CAPSH, homeownership and employment support/services; and $3,605 to HOME line, tenant hotline with free legal advice), and $105,971 to community development ($50,000 to our Home Rehabilitation Program, which provides income -based, deferred payment loans for home improvements; and $55,971 -to WHAHLT, a land trust program that creates affordable single - family homes by subsidizing the land portion of the purchase price). CBDG federal funding has dropped 22% over the last 6 years. (4) We held over for reconsideration at our next meeting the authorization to move forward with parking/wayfinding improvements at 50"' & France, due mainly to a hang -up with the proposed employee parking policy. What staff and parking consultant recommended was to create more permitted employee parking spots (peak employee parking need is in,the 700 range), and spread them out more evenly among the ramps (including prime spots in south ramp). The thought was that by offering a broader mix of permitted parking spots, more employees would comply with the system and move out of the customer designated areas. However, my colleagues were concerned that the recommended' plan would not leave enough dedicated south ramp customer stalls. Staff will hold another discussion with our consultant and the advisory team, investigate other options, and come back to us with a final recommendation at the next meeting. The city portion of the project is $2.375M, the largest cost of which is installation of an elevator in the south ramp, and the parking/wayfinding system. That portion will`be funded out of the Centennial Lakes TIF District, which includes money transferred from a previous 50a' & France TIF District before it was de- certified. (5) We approved the final plat for the Acres Dubois 8 -lot subdivision in the Morningside Neighborhood. The final plat includes a tree and slope preservation easement, which we have been seeing more of these days to preserve drainage and character. It also includes an innovative underground infiltration system that will better manage onsite stormwater and reduce impacts to adjacent properties. (6) We approved the creation of a redevelopment TIF district for Pentagon Park (see attached), which will allow plans to move forward for the multi-phased redevelopment of the blighted site. Potential TIF funded improvements will include parking facilities, stormwater management features, soil correction measures, and transportation infrastructure. The next step is for a preliminary term sheet to be drafted between the city and the developer. (7) We authorized bids for the Edina Sports Dome /Outdoor Rink project, with a budget of $12AM including $2M in project contingencies. This budget was up $2M from preliminary estimates due to additional site work required but not previously identified (site grading, soil correction, retaining walls, and site access), material costs increases and additional improvements required for the related East Rink refrigeration replacement (which ties into the new outdoor rink). There will be a credit of $250,000 to the project due to a grant recently received from Hennepin County Youth Sports. Pamela Park field improvements, being funded through the same bond issue as the Dome, will see a cost savings of approximately $500,000 due to deletion of a new grass field, and accommodation of that demand by slightly enlarging the planned artificial field. (8) We approved Joint City- School District Partnership Goals (see attached), with the addition of item #8 which will cover joint implementation of the Active Routes to School Plan. (9) This year, our communications department is running a 12 month online community outreach campaign, featuring a different topic of interest each month. January's topic was "Food Trucks in Edina. Comments were solicited from our http://speakupedina:org online forum, as well as from social media and other outlets. The full report can be seen here: http: //bit.ly /ldlanlJN. Next up on March..4: final determination on Fred Richards Golf Course, final action on the 50'' & France Project noted above, and appointment of new Board and Commission members. Warmest, :• js josh sprague edina city council cell/text 612.501.0252 website I video blot? Josh Sprague is a Realtor with Edina Realty @ 6800 France, Ave, Board Member of the Rotary Club of Edina, Past Chair & Member of the Southdale YMCA Board, and Member of the Edina City Council You are subscribed to the Goode Group "ed.ina4IL" I unsubscribe, send email to edina4l l +unsubscribe@googlegroups.com Visit this group online at hqp:Hgroups.google.com/group /edina4i 1 ?hl= en ?hl =en You received this message, because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Edi11a411" group. TO Uu1subscribe froni this group and stop receiving entails from it, send an email to edina411 +unsubscribeQgoogle rg_oups.com. For more options, visit https: / /groUs.google.com/groups /opt out. 3 Deb Manaen From: Bruce Kirking <brucekirking@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:38 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: The Fred Dear Whomever, Looking at all the issues and monies l think it is best to shut down the "Fred" golf course. If a business looked like this it would,be.shut down. Unfortunately, we all wish we had more things like this at our,disposal BUT we can't. We need to take care of priority things and let some of these type of things fall away. ,So is reality. Thanks, Bruce Kirking Primerica Financial Services 612 - 327 -9513 cell 1 Deb Mangen From: Abby Schauerman <abbys14 @earthlink.net> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Hello Council Members, I'm writing to you to ask for Fred Richards to stay open. I do believe its the perfect golf course for our youth in Edina and it just needs to be advertised more. I think with better advertising, more junior leagues and lessons, the Fred can increase its revenue. I believe Braemar's Executive course will be heavily impacted and many adults and youth won't be able to get tee times without planning days ahead. While I do understand the,need for Braemar to upgrade its courses and make changes necessary, I Don't believe closing Fred Richards is the answer. Many residents don't even know Fred Richards is there. This is.a problem, It needs to be advertised more and possibly more "fun" events to draw more patrons in. As a mother of 3 in Edina and_a patron of Fred Richards, I ask the members of the council to wait and consider other options for funding and drawing in patrons instead of closing the Fred. Thank you for your consideration, Abby Schauerman Edina Resident s Deb Mangen From: hergiew @comcast.net Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:05 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Braemar Golf Course Honorable Members of the Edina City Council, like playing Braemar Golf Course a lot, even the "New "'nine, and would very much like to see its popularity increase. In 1997, I organized a group of 22 senior, retired golfers. 12 of us play golf somewhere every other Wednesday from May 1st to Oct 1st. Since 1997 we have played close to,'200 times. That's 2400 rounds. Our members take turns selecting the courses we play. No one has ever selected Braemar as the course for the twelve of us to play, not once- in about 200 times. Why? Because our cost to play Braemar with a cart exceeds $50, may be close to $55. The issue is not whether we can afford to pay that. The issue is why should we pay $50 -$55 for Braemar when we can play many very good courses in the metro area for about $32 and certainly substantially less than the cost of Braemar. I expect there are many golfers who feel like we do. Unless Braemar's prices become competitive, the number of rounds played on it will not increase substantially. Wayne Hergott 5629 Interlachen Circle Edina, MN 55436 heraiew(&comcast. net PH. 952 927 -8842 Deb Mangen From: Richard or Margaret Leonard <rleon6553 @yahoo.com> Sent Friday, February 21, 2014 7:39 PM To: Edina Mail; Ron wAY Subject: Braemar Just a note re: the renovation project at our Golf Course As an Edina resident for many years, and not even a golfer as I raised a family here, I always knew the value of this activity center to.the value of my property, and to the value of the young families who used the practice and short course to introduce our children to the game. Now, some years later, and having the opportunity to be a part of the Braemar Ranger Staff for many years, I have to remind the Council of the many visitors we have, using this facility, from all over the world. I have had the good fortune to talk with golfers from Greenland to New Zealand, the Far East, Middle East and all countries in Europe. They are here for business meetings, because Minneapolis is a hub of national and international companies. And the language of business relationships is Golf. Edina has great shopping, restaurants and lodging, but what a business golfer remembers about Edina, and Minnesota, is not the food or where they stayed for the meeting, but the quality of the golf course they played, and the friendliness of the staff. This is how they think of Minnesota, and especially of Edina. Braemar is Edina, and Edina is Braemar. Edina is a top quality community, and to attract more and new top quality businesses from around the world, we need to show that level of quality In our parks and golf facilities. It is an investment in our future we cannot miss. I urge you to do all you can to support the renovation and Improvement of the Braemar gold facility. R. R. Leonard, Edina Margaret and Dick Leonard Felicity Hanson 7457 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 February 20, 2013 Dear Mayor Hovland: I have shared this letter with my neighbors, so I share it with you also. I am writing to express serious concerns regarding the proposed closing of the Fred Richards Golf Course, the park board's ignoring many of the National Golf Foundation's (NGF) recommendations for Edina's golfing enterprise and, finally, the proposals presented by Mr. Tankenoff and Hillcrest Properties for the "park," if the golf course were to close. History I have lived on West Shore Drive for nearly 28 years. My home is a one -story walkout at the far west end, and narrowest point, of the golf course. In the time I've lived here, a large portion of the green area behind my home was taken up by the three -story Barr Engineering building; later, the three -story office building to the west of my home became the four -story Burgundy Place apartment building on West 77`h Street. I spoke at Edina City Council meetings opposing both these proposals in their original form (Barr was originally a six -story building within 300 yards of my backyard). There's No Point Buying a Dog and Barking Yourself My first point: With regard to closing the Fred Richards Golf Course, I believe the Edina City Council is acting with unseemly haste, without sufficient input from concerned citizens or proper research, and the park board is certainly not following the recommendations of the National Golf Foundation (more on that below). I believe there are many aspects to this matter that haven't been fully explored and questions remain, such as options to closing Fred Richards course — why not lease the course to a private operation? Why is the August 2011 National Golf Federation report being ignored, which advised the city to "Resist large -scale capital projects that have low return on investment, such as a) Golf Dome replacement; b) Clunie remodel." (Minutes of the Joint Work Session of the Edina City Council and the Edina Park Board, August 30, 2011). This is only two- and -a -half years ago. Other NGF report quotes contradict the Park Board findings: (http: / /edina.i ranicus.com /MetaViewer.php ?vlew id =8 &clip id= 1263 &meta id= 31037) • [Braemar] golf course and clubhouse are in good condition with no urgent upgrades needed. • The maintenance condition of the Braemar 27 is outstanding, reflecting the quality of the superintendent and the maintenance staff. • While there are concerns about the overall fit of the newer Clunie 9 -hole course at Braemar, any large -scale capital investment in redesigning and /or remodeling the course will not likely produce additional revenue to the facility and thus the Prolect is not cost justified nor recommended. Rather, the City should commit to minor adjustments in the golf course (tree trimming, tee movement, etc.) completed a little at a time and through the existing maintenance program. • The only major capital improvements recommended for the Braemar clubhouse include the renovation of the banquet area restrooms, to be completed before 2013. • Among the keys to growth in golf activity will be increasing participation among minorities and females. Beginner - type facilities such as Braemar Executive, Fred Richards Golf Course, and the Golf Dome can be helpful In meeting this challenge. [Cornelia area has a large minority population. The school is over 40% minority students.] • The Braemar Golf Course could probably do more to try to attract a greater volume of non -golf business to the Braemar Grill. This will likely require some expansion of menu offerings and upgrade in service, but is possible without incurring a large increase in expense. Considering the above points, the city and park board cannot justify their proposed spending spree to upgrade facilities that a couple of years ago received an excellent report. Another question is why, last year, the city paid for a second report from another party, a city manager, who drew different conclusions. I ask that the city contact the NGF for a follow -up report to discover what, if anything, has changed in two years. The neighbors and golfers of the Fred Richards course deserve this second appraisal by the NGF, an organization with many years of experience evaluating city golf courses. Other questions remain: Didn't the Fred make money in 2013 ($28,000) despite awful weather conditions? Is it true that Braemar has a quarter - million dollar advertising budget of which the Fred Richards receives zero? Why aren't there a couple of directional signs on France to make,the Fred Richards course more successful? I could go on, but in my. opinion there are too many unanswered questions that demand the City Council pause for further examination. Have they considered;the impact that closing the course will have on the residents' property values both bordering the course and in the surrounding area? Have they considered how closing the course will affect so many golfers, one third of them children? Why should our properties take the hit for Braemar's upgrades, which the NGF report specifically does not recommend? But I think all this is beside the point. Mr. Tankneoff is In a hurry, so let's get it over with already. The Minneapolis /St Paul online business journal, BizJournals, quoted on December 6, 2013: "There comes a point where we can't wait," Tankenoff said. "Are we integrating our land or not ?" A Tale of Two Proposals My next point: With regard to the proposals put forth by Mr. Tankenoff and Hillcrest Properties, as described in the Jan. 16, 2014 Sun Current, I have even greater concerns. 1 Two proposals were presented to the City Council on January 7, 2014. One offers a design based on the golf course remaining. The other proposal shows a design if the golf course closes. The latter design is of serious concern because it shows a "parkway," which is just a euphemism for a road. The Sun Current states: A parkway that circles the site and returns traffic to West 77`h Street is also planned." This road would enter the golf course at the traffic light at Burgundy Place , apartments, in close proximity to residents' homes, run on the golf course behind Barr Engineering's parking lot, and then veer north away from the new office buildings toward the center of the course. Roads between the office buildings would connect with this "parkway," which would carry vehicles of office workers and visitors, vehicles trying to avoid the West 77`h Street logjam, vehicles of Sparks users, utility vehicles at 5 AM, and so on. Even farther into the center of the course is the planned bike trail. One city council member doesn't recall this road. A February 2014 article by Lisa Kaczke for the Sun Current, states "Bennett said the council has always been clear that Fred Richards will remain public land and won't be sold or become a road, adding that she's not sure where that misinformation is coming from." Perhaps she did not notice this road on Hillcrest's proposal - another reason to slow this process down - but it is very clearly there, whatever we call it. Done Deal? I feel like the decision to close the golf course was made back in 2013, or even prior to that. The Minneapolis /St Paul online business journal, Bizjournals, reported on December 6, 2013: City officials and Tankenoff have met "for the past year to talk about how Pentagon Park could be turned into an upscale office park similar to Centennial Lakes..." The journal further states: Hillcrest's two concepts have one major difference. One is status quo for the golf course site and the other envisions the city dosing the course and creating a public b'a'rk, with ball fields, paths, streams and ponds that are better Integrated through the entire 84 -acre site. [I.e. the public land AND the high- density offices become as one.] [Hillcrest is] seeking tax increment financing assistance from the city to help improve soil conditions and help pay for infrastructure such as street improvements; the golf course plan would require less TIF. (As a method of financing, TIF is now outlawed in California, the state that developed this concept.) Naturally, Mr. Tankenoff "prefers the Integrated approach" for his office park. Does anyone have even" a vague estimate as to what all these changes might cost? Likely more than any deficit the Fred Richards Golf Course could rack up. Noise and Nightlife? Imagination Run Wild Finally, the Jan. 16 Sun Current article states "[Mary] Brindle says she hopes that the potential business and restaurants provide some nightlife for the area so that the entire site doesn't go dark at 5 p.m." Excuse me, I live here! I want the site to go dark; I didn't move here for nightlife and restaurants. If I wanted to live in a busy,area like Centennial Lakes, 1 could have moved there. As if it's not bad enough to face the possibility of the Fred Richards course closing, now we have to contend with imagination run wild in our City Councilors. While some imagination is essential, reimagining the area behind my house is unacceptable. What plan will be next for our backyards? And where did these ideas come from? They came from the presentation Mr. Tankenoff /Hillcrest Properties gave on January 7, 2013, which "ignited the Imagination of city staff and made the city realize what the area west of France Avenue could become." (Sun Current Jan. 16, 2014). Clearly it was very persuasive. I urge the Edina City Council to table the proposal to close Fred Richards Golf Course until probing questions have been answered by the park board regarding the NGF report and options for. Fred Richards more fully explored.. I assert that it is unnecessary to close the golf course, except that it would be extremely desirable for the Tankenoff/Hillcrest Properties office parks. Furthermore, residents deserve assurance regarding the disposition of the green space and that.no road, or "parkway," will be built. As Mr. Tankenoff will proceed with his projects either way, there is little need for a hasty decision. Respectfully, Felicity Hanson felhanson @gmall.com Deb Mangen From: Jeff Paul <jeff_mn554 @yahoo.com> Sent Saturday, February 22, 2014 12:04 PM To: Edina Mail Subject Fred Richards Golf Course Dear Mr. Mayor and Council: support the Park Board's recommendation to close the Fred Richards Golf Course. It is time we make the fiscally prudent decision and realize people just do not play golf has much as they used to. I read'a comment that it was important for our youth to learn to play golf to enhance their future careers. I have been in sales and business development for over 25 years and never take a client out to play,golf. The business world is too diverse and the days of anyone having the luxury of time or money to play golf for business died many years ago. It is also against most business' ethics policies to accept this type of gift or entertainment. I understand that $485,000 of =Edina Liquor profits are used to subsidize the municipal golf'operations annually. The golf operations have benefited from this subsidy too long and there needs to be a change. This subsidy policy is fine to.,help`establish anew enterprise or help support an enterprise in the short -term. But a subsidy should not be the policy long -term for an enterprise used by so few citizens, especially when there is duplication of this enterprise with other Edina golf courses. Please also consider the encroachment of discount liquor stores in Bloomington or potential Sunday sales of liquor. There is a strong possibility that our prior liquor store profitability may decline in the near future and there will be less funding available to support this enterprise. While a few small interests have a lot to gain from keeping the Fred Richards Golf Course open, the costs are spread out over a large group of people, the tax payers of Edina. Please be aware the concentrated group of beneficiaries is much more motivated to lobby for keeping the course open than the more diffuse, disorganized group of non - golfers who may not even know where the course is located. I will not be designing and purchasing a new t -shirt to protest this issue! Please follow the expert's recommendations and close this course. Find a way for those displaced by the closing of one course to strengthen the use of our major course. - Please remember, you are not deciding to close the last golf course in Edina. Those displaced will have many other local. courses to play. Thanks, Jeffrey Dopf Edina Citizen Deb Manaen From: Amy Christensen <Amy.Christensen @scantron.com> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2014 2:14 PM To: Cindy Larson; Cary Teague; David Nelson; Deb Mangen; Edina Mail Cc: Scott Neal; Tony Martin; Amy Bachler jonibenriettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com; John Christensen ( john .christensen @acuitybrands.com) Subject Hours of Construction - Clarification Needed Attachments: ordinance # 2014- 01.pdf; Con Management Plan.pdf Ms. Larson, I live, and have lived, next to many construction projects on my block, Rutledge Avenue. You told me to call the police for any violations and this Sunday there was considerable work being doing at 4524`Rutledge. I called and the dispatcher stated that you had sent an email stating that construction is allowed on Sunday and Holidays. This is what the police dispatchers are stating is the law, stated by you via email, and I am very confused. I looked at every possible ordinance, amendment and communication on the website and I can't find any reference to the ability to allow construction on Sundays and Holidays. In fact, I found just the opposite. 1. The Construction Plan (attached) it states the following: "4 11 .06 Permit Standards for Both Demolition Permits and Building Permits. Subd. 2 Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9 :00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday." 2. The City'Code of Ordinances states the following: "Sec. 10 -111. Permit standards for both demolition permits and building permits.,;---` (b) Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. 3. It also appears the ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -01 was also updated in February to clarify that they cannot work on Sundays and Holidays. (Attached) The "ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT ENFORCEMENT" which was signed by Debra Mangen and James Hovland on February 3, 2014 states the following: "Sec. 10 -111. Permit standards for both demolition permits and building permits. (b) Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Work is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays." The Police Dispatcher was very pleasant and stated that my information was incorrect. She is doing her job very well but I can't see in any the published Edina laws, that it is OK to work on Sundays and Holidays. It seems that it was only in an email by you, our liaison. If I am incorrect, please point me to the change in the ordinance that allows this variation in operational hours. Also, if I am incorrect, exactly when do we get a reprieve from the construction? When can we celebrate holidays? When can our children play in the snow without strange men hovering around? The neighborhood kids just wanted to play outside and they couldn't because of the construction. It is loud, full of traffic and involves total strangers. Frankly, they can't be outside during any project. Please clarify where I am incorrect and if there was a misunderstanding, please clarify that with the Police. - Amy Christensen 4520 Rutledge Avenue Edina, MN 55436 [O] 952 - 3749126 [C] 952- 240 -9120 Amv. Christensen @Scantron.com 5CANTRON. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message Is intended only for the recipient and may contain information that is confidential. If you -_ are not the Intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient; please be aware that any dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to the message and deleting all copies, including attachments, from your system. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR (For Oftke Use Only) Project Name & Site Address Number QR Code Permit Number The construction on this site will follow normal industry and City accepted construction methods for a project of this type. Specific items of concern'will be addressed as noted below. Any references to start date or duration of specific items are estimated and included only for reference. Construction management plans can also be found at:www.EdlnaMN.gov The undersigned hereby ad<nowledges that they are responside for complying with the below conditions.' Signature of Contractor. Date Site Contractor. Address: Phone: Email Address: The estimated construction start date is The estimated completion date Is 411.05 Permit Requirements. Unless otherwise specifically prgvided the following are required for both demolition permits and building permits. Demolition and Building Permit are defined as follows: Demolition: The removal or destruction of more than fifty percent (507.) of the area of the exterior walls of a single or two family dwelling unit. Building Permit A permit to construct a new single or two family dwelling unit Subd. I The applicant must furnish the City with a certificate of insurance evidencing the following required coverage: Commercial general liability, including XCU coverage: Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate products and completed operations Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Liability (owned, non - owned, hired): Bodily Injury: $1,000,000 each occurrence $1,000,000 each accident Property Damage: $1,000,000 each occurrence The minimum insurance coverage must be maintained until six (6) months after the demolition has been completed or, if a new dwelling is being constructed, a certificate of occupancy has been issued. The City must be named as an additional insured. Subd. 2 The applicant must furnish the City a cash escrow of Two Thousand Five Hundred ($2,500) Dollars. A single escrow'is required for both a demolition permit and building permit. The City may'draw.on the cash escrow to reimburse the City for the repair of damage to public property or to remedy permit violations. If the City draws on the cash escrow, upon the City's demand the permit holder must deposit in escrow additional funds to restore the escrowed amount to Two Thousand Five Hundred ($2,500) Dollars. The cash escrow must remain in place until the work under the permit for which the escrow was made has been completed. Subd. 3 Based upon soil types, topography, the location of adjacent structures and other pertinent information, the Building Official shall determine if a soils investigation report is necessary. If the Build hg.Offkial determines that a soils report is necessary, the applicant shall have a soil report prepared and signed by a licensed professional soil scientist or licensed professional engineer. The report must provide detailed plans to ensure that adjacent property will not, be damaged by reducing lateral support for driveways, foundations, fences or lawns caused by excavation, demolition or construction activity. The report must be approved by the Building Official: The permit holder must adhere to the approved plan. Subd. 4 Before a permit is issued, the Building Official must photograph the existing.condition of the property, curbs, sidewalks, streets, boulevard and trees adjacent to the property. Subd. 5 For a demolition permit, at least fifteen (15) days before demolition commences, the permit holder must provide written notification to all property owners within three hundred (300) feet of the demolition site notifying the property owners of the proposed demolition and building plans, if applicable, and invite them to a neighborhood meeting. The neighborhood meeting must be held at least five (5) days before demolition commences. A sign must also be posted on the demolition site at least five (5) days before demolition commences Identifying the nature of the demolition, the permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The sign must also provide a City phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The dimension of the sign must be between five (5) and six (6) square feet. The sign and the content of the sign must be visible from the street. The sign must be kept in place until the completion of demolition. Subd. 6 For a building permit, a sign must be posted on the permit site at least five (5) days before construction commences identifying the nature of the construction, the permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The sign must also provide a City phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The dimension of the sign must be between five (5) and six (6) square feet. The sign and the content of the sign must be visible from the street. The sign must be kept in place until a certificate of occupancy has been issued. Subd. 7 For a building permit, the applicant must submit stormwater and erosion control plans prepared and signed by a licensed professional engineer. The plans must be approved by the City Engineer and the permit holder must adhere to the approved plans. The stormwater management plan must detail how stormwaterwill be controlled to prevent damage to adjacent property and adverse impacts to the public stormwater drainage system. The erosion control plan must document how proper erosion and sediment control will be maintained on a continual basis to contain on -site erosion and protecton and off -,site vegetation. Permit holder must protectall storm drain inlets with sediment capture devices at all time during the project when soil disturbing activities may result in sediment laden storm water runoff entering the inlet. The permit holder is responsible for preventing or minimizing the potential for unsafe conditions, flooding, or siltation problems. Devices must be regularly cleaned out and emergency overflow must bean integral part of the device to reduce the flooding potential. Devices must be placed to prevent the creation of driving hazards or obstructions. 411.06 Permit Standards for Both Demolition Permits and Building Permits. Subd. I The permit holder must comply with the State Building Code, State Statutes and the City Code, including City Code Sections 410, 415, 425 and 830. Subd. 2 Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hour; of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Subd. 3 The permit holder must repair any damage to public property, streets, and sidewalks. If damage occurs to the foregoing, it must be repaired within three (3) working days after the damage occurs, unless the permit holder has received written permission from the Building Official to delay repairs to a later specified date. Subd. 4 The permit holder must maintain a five-foot (5') parking setback from driveways and a thirty-foot (30') parking setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within twelve (12) inches of the curb. Vehicles In violation of these requirements may be towed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes § 168B.035. On street parking of equipment other than licensed motor vehicles Is prohibited. Stopping, standing or parking a vehicle is prohibited, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: a. On a boulevard between the sidewalk and roadway; b. Within five (5) feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway; C. Where the vehicle will block a fire escape or the exit from any building; d. Where temporary signs prohibit parking. Parking is allowed on local streets if a twelve -foot (12') wide area is open for the traveled portion of the road. On collector and arterial roadways, a minimum of twenty -two feet (22') must be open for the traveled portion of the road. Off - street and off -site parking for on site workers is required to the extent practicable. .Subd. 5 The permit holder must Install and maintain a rock entrance pad or its equivalent at each location where vehicles enter or exit the construction site, at locations approved by the Building Official. Subd. 6 The site must be maintained In a neat and orderly condtion. Prior to leaving the construction site at the end of each day, the permit holder must remove empty cans, paper, plastic and other material that Is not needed for construction from the site or deposit them in a dumpster. The permit holder must keep streets, sidewalks, boulevard areas and adjacent properties clean from waste, materials or refuse resulting from operations on the site. Inoperable equipment and equipment not being used on the site must be removed within twenty four (24) hours after it becomes inoperable or is no longer in use. Where work on any project lies within areas of pedestrian traffic or vehicular traffic, the project area must be cleaned and swept and all materials related to the project must be stockpiled in appropriate areas. Debris must be contained on the project site No material may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards, sidewalks or adjacent property., At the end of each working day, the permit holder must remove any soil, trash or debris thatwashed or was deposited on any public sidewalk or street and must remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any adjacent property. Subd. 7 Dust control is the responsibility of the permit holder. The permit holder must eliminate dust problems immediately upon receiving notice from the Building Official that there is a dust problem. Subd. 8 No building material, temporary sanitary facilities, dumpster or equipment maybe placed within street right -of- way, or on a sidewalk. Motor vehicles may not be parked or stopped on a sidewalk. Public sidewalks must be left open and unobstructed at all times. Subd. 9 Prior to commencing demolition, protective fencing approved by the Building Official must be Installed around boulevard trees and trees that will not be removed. 411.07 Stop Work Orders. If the Building Official finds any work being performed Ina dangerous or unsafe manner or that is in violation of the provisions of the permit, City Code or the State .Building Code, the Building Official may Issue a stop work order. The stop work order must be in writing and issued to the permit holder or the person doing the work. Upon issuance of a stop work order, the cited work must immediately cease The stop work order must state the reason for the order and the conditions under which the cited work will be permitted to resume. 411.08 Misdemeanor. Violations of this Section or of the terms of approval of a permit issued under this Section are a misdemeanor. ORDINANCE NO. 2014 -01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING RESIDENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT ENFORCEMENT THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 10 -109 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 10 -109. Permit applications. The applicant must complete the application forms provided by the city, pay the permit fees in the amount set forth in section 2 -724, deposit the cash escrow and furnish all other documents and reports required for the permit. The application must be signed by the property owner or the owner's authorized agent Section 2. Section 10 -1 10 (3) & (5) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 10 -1 10. Permit requirements. (3) Soils investigation report and shoring plan. Based upon soil types, topography, the location of adjacent structures and other pertinent information, the building official shall determine if a soils investigation report and /or shoring plan is necessary. If the building official determines that a soils report is necessary, the applicant shall have a soil report prepared and signed by a licensed professional soil scientist or licensed professional engineer. If the building official determines a shoring plan is necessary, the applicant The r-epe must provide a detailed plan to ensure that adjacent property will not be damaged by reducing lateral support for driveways, foundations, fences or lawns caused by excavation, demolition or construction activity. The soils report and shoring plan must be approved by the building official. The permit holder must adhere to the approved plan(s). (5) Written notification of demolition. For a demolition permit, at least 15 calendar days before demolition commences, the permit holder must provide written notification to all property owners within 300 feet of the perimeter of the demolition site notifying the property owners of the proposed demolition and building plans, if applicable, and invite them to a neighborhood meeting. The neighborhood meeting must be held at least five days. before demolition commences. A sign must also be posted on the demolition site at least five days before demolition commences identifying the nature of the demolition, the permit holder, a contact name and phone number, and the site address. The sign must also provide a city phone number to call with any questions, complaints or concerns. The dimension of the sign must be between five and six square feet. The sign and the content of the sign must.be visible from the street. The sign must be kept in place until the completion of demolition. Section 3. Section 10 -1 1 1 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 10 -1 1 1. Permit standards for both demolition permits and building permits. Ordinance No. 2014 -01 Page 2 (a) The permit holder must comply with the state building code, state statutes and this Code, including articles 111, VI, VII and.XVll of this chapter. (b) Deliveries of equipment and material to the site, work crews on site and construction and demolition activity are prohibited except between the hours of 7:00 a:m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Work is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. (c) The permit holder must repair any damage to public property, streets, and sidewalks. If damage occurs to the foregoing, it must be repaired within three working days after the damage occurs, unless the permit holder has received written permission from the building official to delay repairs to a later specified date. (d) The permit holder must maintain a 5 -foot parking setback from driveways and a 30 -foot parking setback from intersections. When parking on a street, a vehicle must be completely located on the street surface, parallel to and within 12 .inches of the curb. Vehicles in violation of these requirements may be towed in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 168B.035. On- street parking of equipment other than licensed motor vehicles is prohibited. Stopping, standing or parking a vehicle is prohibited, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or traffic control device, in any of the following places: (1) On a boulevard between the sidewalk and roadway; (2) Within five (5) feet of the intersection of any public or private driveway or alley with any street or highway; (3) . Where the vehicle will block a fire escape or the exit from any building; (4) Where temporary signs prohibit parking. Parking is allowed on local streets if a 12 400t wide area Is open for the traveled portion of the road. On collector and arterial roadways, a minimum of 22 feet must be open for the traveled portion of the road. Off,street and ofd site parking for on -site workers is required to the extent practicable. Police officers, community service officers, parking monitors and the Residential Redevelopment Coordinator of the City shall be responsible for enforcing the parking requirements and parking regulations of this Section. (e) The permit holder must install and maintain a rock entrance pad or its equivalent at each location where vehicles enter or exit the construction site, at locations approved by the building official. Ordinance No. 2014 -01 Page 3 (f) The site must be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. Prior to leaving the construction site at the end of each day, the permit holder must remove empty cans, paper, plastic and other material that is not needed for construction from the site or deposit them in a dunipster. The permit holder must keep streets, sidewalks, boulevard areas and adjacent properties clean from waste, materials or-refuse resulting from operations on the site. Inoperable equipment and equipment not being used on the site must be removed within -24 hours after it becomes inoperable or is no longer in use. Where work on any project lies within areas of pedestrian traffic or vehicular traffic, the project area must be cleaned 'and swept and all materials related to the project must be stockpiled in appropriate areas. Debris must be contained on the project site. No material may be deposited or stockpiled on the public streets, boulevards, sidewalks or adjacent property. At the end of each working day, the permit holder must remove any soil, trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any public sidewalk or street and must remove any trash or debris that washed or was deposited on any adjacent property. (g) Dust control is the responsibility of the permit holder. As weather permits, materials subject to demolition shall be thoroughly dampened with water so as to prevent dust. The permit holder must eliminate dust problems immediately upon receiving notice from the building official that there is a dust problem. (h) No building material, temporary sanitary facilities, dumpster or equipment may be placed within street right -of -way, or on a sidewalk Motor vehicles may not be parked or stopped on a sidewalk. Public sidewalks must be left open and unobstructed at all times. (i) Prior to commencing demolition, protective fencing approved by the building official must be installed around boulevard trees and trees that will not be removed. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: February 3, 2014 Second Reading: Waived Published: February 13, 2014 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Cleric James B. Hovland, Mayor Deb Mangen From: Scott Nelson <sdnelsommn@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 4:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: BRAEMAR GOLF OPERATIONS Good morning Mayor Hovland, Esteemed City Council Members, City Manager Neal, and Director Kattreh: I imagine you have received hundreds of emails regarding the topic of Braemar Golf Operations and have been deep in careful thought and consideration. I commend all of you for your commitment to the City of Edina and its future as it relates to the Golf Operations. The passion people have shown—the rationale they have presented... are all anchored in sound and reasonable'thought. But the emotion needs to be put to the side and sound business judgment and principles need to be pursued. Do you look at development of a new surge of golfers, or look at upgrading the existing jewel of Braemar Golf Operations? You look at both ... for now. and over the next ten years and beyond. Braemar was one of the leading public golf courses in the state, and even recognized as one of the 'Top 75' in the nation. I would hope we are in the 'Top 75' of the state (quite a come down) today, but we are Edina ... we need to be one of the best public courses in the state. There are options for Fred Richards. Repurpose it, so as golf popularity climbs, Edina is ready to react. Maybe a 6 hole course. Maybe larger holes. Perhaps elimination of bunkers. Solutions like this are being looked at nationally as the game of golf goes through a transition and is being forced to 'reinvent' itself. Edina could be on the leading edge if we stay prepared. Invest in the Braemar complex for now. Improved driving range... infrastructure ... cart paths are just three of the first actions that could prove to the metropolitan area that Braemar is back! That parking lot should be full again and Braemar will contribute to the revenue stream of Edina, and not a drain. Thank you again for your commitment, and for your considerations. Best Regards Scott Nelson 6428 Vernon Avenue 952 - 220 -5166 . Sent from my Wad Deb Manaen From: tviinklarson@msn.com Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 5:20 PM To: Edina Mail Subject golf Close Fred Richards and invest in Braemar's regulation course. 1 Deb Mangen From: Patty Dronen <pdronen @hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:59 AM To: Edina Mail Subject 5146 Eden Avenue I- am writing to you to share my views on how to best use the 3.3 acre property at 5146 Eden Avenue. I'm sure all of the City Council members have traveled to other suburban cities that have new, big, beautiful community centers. This is something that Edina is sorely lacking. Our community center is anything but the things I described in the opening of this paragraph. The building is hard to navigate, uneasy to use without having a permit, old, and not inviting at all. Sharing a facility with an elementary school is not'ideal. Parking is atrocious. Imagine a welcoming community center with classroom space, gyms, play areas, workout facilities, maybe a theatre space, maybe a small cafe /coffee shop. That is something this community needs. A community center for all members of our community; ;young and old. Do not sell or lease this land to'`a developer. We do not need any more senior high rises, apartment buildings, etc. As is evidenced by the number of tear -downs our city is experiencing, people moving into this community have money. They want to live in.a city with a great school system, conveniently located to all areas of the metro area. They want/need a community center that can compete with other communities' centers. These same families will stay in Edina if we can provide them with a community center that they WANT to use, not one they NEED to use. Thank you for your time Patty Dronen Deb Manaen From: Betsy Nelson <betsytn @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:20 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennett@comcast.nK Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsp rag ue@edina rea lty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Closing Fred Richards golf course Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I'm writing to express my concern about the recent recommendation to close the Fred Richards golf course. I am a lifelong Edina resident whose family has enjoyed the exceptional quality of life our city has to offer. We have enjoyed the outdoor and indoor parks, skating rinks, ball fields; walking trails, tennis courts, concerts, swimming pools, fireworks, amazing schools, and golf courses. .I feel that closing Fred Richards is a hasty decision without any regard for the feelings of Edina residents. My husband Bob attended the two meetings that were held to inform the public and hear comments about the plan. He was struck by two things: the overwhelming feeling of the Edina residents in attendance that closing Fred Richards is a mistake, and the rush to this decision without addressing any other solutions or having a master plan. Closing this jewel of a small golf course will directly affect all our'residents, but especially two segments of our population who the city usually finds important. This is the course where our young people learn to play golf, a lifelong sport that they will enjoy long after they have stopped putting on football pads, hockey helmets, and baseball shoes. This is the course where our older adults, who have spent countless hours watching their kids in those football pads, hockey skates, and baseball gloves, can play a relaxing round of golf. I took my first golf lessons at Braemar. We learned to putt and practiced our swings. But when it came time to learn how to play a game, we went to Fred Richards. Experienced players walked the course with us, teaching us etiquette and the ins and outs of golf. There was a slower pace at Fred Richards and we were able to take our time as beginners. My husband plays the course every week from May through September with a Seagate Technology golf league. It's the perfect course for a league made of people with widely varying abilities. Losing this golf course will be a mistake and a huge loss for the city. Closing Fred Richards should not be the solution to a deficit in the park budget. If we don't have enough golfers for all of our courses, have we done any marketing? People won't play on a course that they don't know about. I feel strongly that this is a hasty decision and more research needs to be done. Please stand back and think about other options before taking such a drastic step. Sincerely, Betsy Tudor Nelson 612 - 309 -6580 Deb Manaen From: Laura Hotmail Account <1aura196511 @hotmai1.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:54 AM To: Edina Mail Subject Golf operations study is not being studied with more reasonable assumptions! Dear Council Members, I am very concerned that staff Is not updated the golf operations study with more reasonable "rounds of golf' as requested by a member of the park board at the last park board meeting. Economic and financial decisions are being made based on the golf study which has an unreasonable assumption of an Increase in golf rounds at Braemar from 79,000 to 100,000. I am very concerned about the financial health of the city given staffs use of a very optimistic estimate of future rounds of golf. Also it is shocking that staff has conveniently found an 'omission" of $250,000 in the financial statements. The reality Is the financial statements show Fred Richards does not lose money. Below is the response from Ann Kattreh to my request to see the updated study with more reasonable future rounds of golf as requested by the park board member: Hi Laura, We are not updating or changing the golf operations study as presented at the last 2 public hearings. Sincerely, Ann 1 This process is moving way to fast, please vote no on Tuesday for closing the treasure that is Fred Richards. As a city lets do this process right and involve the citizens and use reasonable assumptions for the'future of golf operations in Edina. Thank You, Laura Schleck c: 612 - 865 -7852 2 Deb Manaen From: Jenny Laffita (CC) <Jenny.Laffita @cityofdoral.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:57 PM . Cc: Barbara Herrera (CC); Connie Diaz (CC); Karina La Rosa (CC); Mayor Boria Subject: City of Doral Resolution Supporting Reforms to Current Immigration Laws and Regulations Attachments: Res _No _14 -30 Immigration_Reform.pdf Good Afternoon, Honorable Mayor's, On behalf of Mayor, Luigi Boria of the City of Dora[, Florida, please see attached a resolution supporting reforms to the current immigration laws and regulations. Mayor Boria is sending this resolution for your consideration. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mayor Boria at 305.593.6725 Respectfully, Jennifer M. Laffita R Local Hearing & Public Records Coordinator City of Doral 8401 NW 53rd Terrace Doral, FL 33166 Tel: 305 - 593 -6730 ext. 7015 E Fax: 305 - 593 -6620 1 ennv. Laf Pita @citvofdo ral. cone www.ciMofdora1.co D O"FL The City of Doral is on Twitter and Facebook! ""Please note that the State of Florida's Public Records Laws provide that most written communications to or from the City of Doral regarding government business are public records available to the public upon request This e-mail communication may therefore be subject to public disclosure. — 1 ENERGY FLOWS Sustainability goals identified at an early design charette highlighted maximization of transparency between spaces, using daylight throughout the entire building, reinforcing opportunities for passive cooling, creating strong connections to the site and providing a welcoming open display of recreation and community spaces. These forces resulted in a long thin building footprint that allows for exceptional daylight and cross ventilation, while creating a large protected south facing courtyard. Radiant concrete slab floors are heated or chilled to maintain comfortable temperatures throughout the year while using minimal energy. The mass of the concrete in the floor as well as in exposed thermally massive walls effectively stores heat or coolness to decrease the effect of exterior temperature swings. Other passive systems such as automated natural ventilation and solar shading devices that block heat gain from direct sun in the summer, but allow it during the winter work in tandern with the thermal mass and mechanical systems. A central heat pump recovers waste heat in the summer and uses it to heat the pool and domestic water, often allowing the 96% efficient boilers to shut down entirely. Daylight sensors integrated with dimmable energy efficient lighting fixtures eliminate the use of artificial lighting whenever possible. In combination, these systems result in energy use that is anticipated to be at least 27% less than traditional building construction. Mechanical Air Handler Systems Energy Use �-7Q 0 Anm.1�111 Energy Savings O'',5L- Annt.lal Energy Cost Savings 7 -ii (D UU1' j . '01 T seiine 3 31I ® . 1 •It HU-' Energy Use �-7Q 0 Anm.1�111 Energy Savings O'',5L- Annt.lal Energy Cost Savings 7 -ii (D UU1' j . '01 T seiine Water Use Reduction ;jf K;. u gall its c v m �• — J? .e' , <1 M K M, r WATER CYCLE By carefully selecting drought tolerant native plants that can survive the region's dry summers and using high efficiency irrigation technology, water use for irrigation was reduced by over 50 %. Water use inside the building was reduced by 310/0 over a baseline building, while water use for sewage conveyance was reduced by 63 %. This is achieved through the use of waterless urinals and low flow fixtures, as well as by using graywater from the pool's filter backwash system to flush many of the building's toilets. Approximately 60,000 gallons of 'recycled' graywater are used annually. Monthly Precipitation kA A k4 1 1 TO-:_iil:!iL.:, FIC 3F- . i SITE ECOLOGY AND LAND USE The Firstenburg Community Center is a two level building massed to reduce the development footprint, preserve mature tree stands and enliven the facility by concentrating activity and social spaces. At the start of the design process, an extensive tree survey identified the presence of laminated root rot disease throughout much of the forested site, as well as dense stands of weak trees dangerously susceptible to blow down. The footprint and position of the building are a result of careful analysis of the areas of healthy and significant trees, solar orientation, prevailing -wind direction, noise from the adjacent street, and program requirements. The building takes advantage of the park -like setting with large windows for daylighting and courtyards to allow interior functions to participate with the natural landscape. Native drought - tolerant planting was integrated into the coniferous forest ecology creating habitat for birds and other species. Use of alternative transportation is encouraged by building a bus stop and shelter, providing ample bike parking and designated carpool parking and creating pedestrian links to an adjacent park and future regional trail. The parking lot's organic shape maximizes the number of significant existing trees retained, while its use of porous concrete and drainage swales means that all of the stormwater is managed on site with no impact on the municipal system. ;u. ^p sarcl,xon 7 r ttNNhY''" Level 1 I�� t Program ¢n �i a� ,� -< Level 2 �. The Firstenburg Community Center is a multi -use facility that combines recreational and community spaces with other public services. It embodies the character of the community, provides convenient access to services and brings together a diverse mix of users. The recreation program includes swim and warm water leisure /therapy pools, a two -court gymnasiurn, fitness space, aerobics dance studios and multi - purpose activity spaces. The community spaces incorporate child watch, a teen lounge and game room, a senior lounge and resource room, and meeting rooms. The multi -use community rooms, which together seat up to 350, address the lack of meeting and gathering spaces in east Vancouver and provide a venue for City Council meetings, social dances, performances, neighborhood fairs and community forums. The building and site were carefully designed to seamlessly integrate a now complete city branch library (also designed by Opsis), a future lap pool, and a future arts and crafts wing, which will reinforce the civic identity of this facility. Families have the opportunity to visit the site together, using library and community center resources to enjoy a wide range of recreation and learning activities. ,niinler SUr. i _rnmei Sun Project Summary Location: VanCOLIver, Washington Gross Sf: 80,982 sf Budding F'ooiprint 64.003 sf Cornpleted. 2007 Site rRiatLlreS 3 BU :its p Future Lap R:>p Sd <e Flarkini7 �J Vancouver, Washington s s. The LEED Gold Certified Firstenburg Community Center creates an enduring model of civic architecture and a source of pride for the city of Vancouver. With thousands of visitors daily, the Center provides an unequaled opportunity to demonstrate to the public the benefits and beauty of successful green design. opsis architecture Respectfully, Kim Montgomery K B Montgomery kmschoolmail(cDaol.com z Heather Branigin From: K B Montgomery <kmschoolmail @aol.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fwd: Letter to the CAT Attachments: Firstenburg -Detail ed- Case - Study- 2.pdf; Grandview CAT Irt 22712.doc Hi Lynette, Could you please send this letter to the CAT for tonight's meeting and copy the Council. Many thanks, Kim K B Montgomery kmschoolmail(aD,aol.com - - - -- Original Message--- - From: K B Montgomery <kmschoolmail(cbaol.com> To: kmschoolmail <kmschoolmail(cDaol.com> Sent: Thu, Feb 27, 2014 3:18 pm Subject: Letter to the CAT February 27, 2014 To the GrandView Community Advisory Team Cc: Edina City Council I understand the CAT is going to have a discussion about potential public uses for the former public works site tonight. In advance of that discussion, I thought it might be helpful for the CAT to see a successful Gold LEED certified community center in Van: couver, WA. I have attached a case study for Firstenburg Community Center. I am also sending a link to the Master Plan used in creating the Firstenburg: http:Hwww.sportsmgmt.com/ projects /featured pro' ects/firstenburg assets /Firstenburg.pdf Vancouver used its strategic planning processes (Parks and Recreation Facilities and Services Strategic Plan and Comprehensive Facility Needs Study) to first define community goals. Edina is about to embark on its Vision 2040, revise its Comp Plan and create a Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Like Vancouver, these plans could and should be used to first inform community needs planning in GrandView. The public process to define programming, site planning and do conceptual design work took 3 months (page 3- Master Plan). In addition, the Master Plan included a market analysis, projections for capital costs, revenue potential, estimated operations costs and capital funding recommendations. In total, the study to define and design the community center took 6 months. In order to adequately address, design and develop public amenities to serve community needs in GrandView, an experienced public realm consultant (not a developer) should be engaged. To do less, will short - change Edina and its residents. Thank you, as always, for your time and attention. Heather Branigin From: Laura J. Davis <jdlaura2004 @yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 1:11 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: Melody Chestler, Aileen Foley; Mary Werbalowsky; Louann Waddick; Sarah Zarrin; Meg Davidson Subject: To Mayor and City Council from Edina Go Green Dear.Mayor Hovland and Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague and Swenson: For your information, please see the link below to an Article in yesterday's New York Times entitled, "California Endangered Species: Plastic Bags" which discusses the efforts of California lawmakers to ban single use plastic bags on a statewide basis. The State Senator sponsoring that legislation is quoted as saying, "It has become increasingly clear to the public the environmental damage that single -use plastic bags have reaped." As you all know, one of Edina.Go Green's ultimate goals is to ban single use plastic bags in Edina, as it has been done in many other progressive communities all over the world. To that end, in the next few months we hope to meet with each of you to discuss our next steps in moving that goal closer toward reality. We look forward to seeing you all soon. Thank you, Edina Go Green Melody Chestler, Meg Davidson, Laura Davis, Aileen Foley, Louann Waddick, Mary Werbalowsky, Sarah Zarrin. https: / /urldefense.r)roofr)oirit. corn /vl /url ?u= his: / /www,nvtimes.com /2014 /02 /26 /us/ lgstic -bags -come- under- sig2ee -in: california.htrnl? r% 3DO& k= 2a4Akk i3oY %2FOkiwftlMTMw %3D %3D %OA &r =1 Bvmt3oyzZn4OhHn7m3YfTAOLOu6YDYHPt FJ% F22cSQA% 3D% OA &m= swBjzoESVNEYor7U %2BNfXlwm4dl WyoPXrv8% 2FbXZiEmWs %3n %OA &s =a7cf3010eb56, 6f98122f94a747e0e5d24bc2ef919d9ea3cb56704ce44d3e88f3 Heather Branigin From: Hale Kunerth <hale @ big planet.com> Sent: Wednesday; February 26, 2014 7:03 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards I would like to support the.park boards recommendation to close Fred Richards golf course. Also I would like to suggest a development- similar to centennial lakes. A combination of public /park space along with commercial space. With-the park area buffering the existing residential area to the north. I often marvel as I walk around centennial lakes at how a former gravel pit was turned into something so spectacular. Hale Kunerth 20 year Edina resident 1 Heather Branigin From: Mary Beth <marybethgaines @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:18 FM To: Edina Mail Subject: SW LRT Hello James, Please do not destroy STEP, our local food shelf by voting in favor of the current proposed train reroute. They serve over 4000 st.louis park residents. More than one fourth of the children who attend our great SLP schools receive food and services from STEP. A bike trail cannot mean more than food on these people's tables. Please. Thank you, Mary Beth Gaines Heather Branigin From: adickeyl @comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:00 PM To: Edina Mail; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Mary Brindle (Comcast); joshsprague @edinarealty.com; swensonannl @gmail.com Subject: Save Fred Richards I am writing on behalf of my family and our community, with the hopes of the City of Edina opting to find a way to keep Fred Richards Golf course open. I have spent a majority of my life time enjoying the game of golf, played for EHS, won a State Championship for Edina and continue to compete as an adult. I learned to play at the Braemar Par 3 course back in the 70s, it was the perfect environment for new golfers to learn the game and develop a life -long love of the game. I have now shared that love of the game with my children. Over the years, my children have learned to play and LOVE the game of golf -- and it has been at Fred Richards. We chose the Fred as a learning ground for 3 reasons: 1) As Braemar is unable /unwilling to accommodate young golfers, the Fred is the only course that allows children to play, and enjoy the sport. 2) Braemar did away with the Par 3 course I learned on and replaced it with an Executive Course -- which is too challenging for kids just learning how to play. 3) It is in our community and we wanted to support the City of Edina. I know there is a financial burden on the city, however I fear that your solution (to close the Fred), doesn't solve the problem, but makes the problem worse If the monies saved from closing The Fred are invested back at Braemar - -it would cause the following problems: . 1) The course would be made more challenging (eliminating the elderly as well as the intermediate young golfer)­ , 2) The age limit for kids to play at Braemar is 12 (lowering the age wouldn't help b/c the course would be too challenging for the new golfer) Waiting until they are 12 to play Braemar ensures that the next generation of Edina residents will not learn nor play the game of golf. By 12, they have already been exposed to a majority of activities offered within our community. As a mother of 4, the pressure on our kids to find activities to pursue is easy, but i want my children to have the option to play the game of golf, a lifetime sport that promotes competition, independence, and a healthy lifestyle. The only way our community can support the next generation, and thereby MAINTAINING Braemar's rounds /year - -is to keep The Fred open. Sincerely, Ann Dickey 'k s. Meeting Basic Needs. Building Stronger Communities. February 20, 2014 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 50th Street West Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland; Thank you for the City, of Edina's annual support of $25,000.00. This contribution will have an immediate impact on families in Edina during times of financial crisis to help them regain stability. We've been in our new location for a. little over a month and the impact on VEAP's ability to serve our community was immediate. Over 200,000 pounds of food were distributed through VEAP's Food Pantry in the month of January! In one day alone, 170 families were able to visit the pantry and select a seven day supply of food -- with room to spare. VEAP's old pantry was at capacity when it served 120 families a day. The move to our new home has also decreased the wait for a pantry appointment; from an average of five days to next day or even same day appointments. This makes a tremendous difference to families such as Carla's. When Carla's car broke down, she needed to cancel her appointment. When she called to reschedule, she was so grateful that she didn't have to wait a week for an appointment. Carla was able visit the pantry the following day and didn't have to worry about how she would feed her young family. On behalf of all the families and individuals VEAP serves, thank you again for your support. Together we are building a stronger Edina community. Sincerely, Susan Russell Freeman Executive Director P.S. Join us Friday, February 28, 2014 for a Toast to VEAP! Visit our website, VEAP.org to purchase tickets and for more information on this event to celebrate VEAP's new home. Please consider this letter your receipt: VEAP is a 501 (c)(3) organization and all contributions are tax- deductible to the full extent of the law. No goods or services were received in exchange for this contribution. 9600 Aldrich Avenue South ® Bloomington, MN 55420 0 veap.org a P:952.888.9616 a F:952.881.8322 -- � lqoa70 I ke- v vim, J �� r� r 4.al C qif atj 4-& l�;vrl lti?t�C ;JAN I l � l'cU w" u� 111 UA- - V l �Y.ic.eX� L 4h Mrs. i� jnt►(oTF��1CCir Lakeville- Y_'f1 Res. No. 14 -30 Page 3 of 3 By unanimous consensus of the City Council, the item was approved. Mayor Luigi Boria Yes Vice Mayor Christi Fraga Yes Councilwoman Ana Maria Rodriguez Yes Councilwoman Bettina Rodriguez Aguilera Yes Councilwoman 'Sandra Ruiz Yes A' PASSED and ADOPTED this 19 day of February, 2014. VIM, • ATTEST: S6� BARBARA HERRERA, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY FOR THE USE AND REk IA CE OF THE CITY OF DORAL ONLY: JOHN jR. ERIN, JR., CI ATTORNEY 4 5 Res. No. 1430 Page 2 of 3 themselves and their families. This is also essential to our efforts to combat crime and provide effective police protection for our residents, property owners, businesses and visitors. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DORAL, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. ReciWs. The above recitals are true, correct, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Immigration Reform. The City believes the time is ripe for Congress to pass legislation that fixes immigration and creates a system that builds our economy, meets the nation's future workforce requirements, eliminates the incentives to enter the country illegally, humanely deals with the undocumented persons already here, and works to keep families together. Section 3. Ciy Clerk. The City Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Resolution to the State of Florida members of the United States House of Representatives and Senate. Section 4 Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Res. No. 14 -30 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION No. 14- 30 A RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DORAL, FLORIDA SUPPORTING CONGRESSIONAL EFFORTS TO ADOPT AND IMPLEMENT REFORMS TO THE CURRENT: IMMIGRATION LAWS' AND REGULATIONS;' AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FORWARD A COPY OF THIS RESOLUTION TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Doral '(the "City) believes fixing our nation's broken immigration laws is among the most important issues of interest to our residents and the City believes strongly that maintaining the status quo will further damage the economic, political and social structure of our cities and our country; and WHEREAS, the City believes that a meaningful fix to immigration must begin with a strengthening of border security. Further, interior enforcement should be improved to enhance our ability to identify and remove visa overstays, but our state and local law enforcement must be able to remain focused on community policing; and WHEREAS, the nation would benefit from a less bureaucratic and more time- sensitive. system that allows workers of all types - seasonal, agricultural, lesser - skilled and high skilled — to lawfully come to America, either temporarily or permanently, and contribute to our economy; and WHEREAS, part of immigration reform must also provide a uniform system of employment verification; and WHEREAS, there are equally compelling moral dimensions also related to immigration reform that underscore the importance of moving forward with the effort; people must be able to come out of the shadows and fully pursue the American Dream for Heather,B_ranigin From: Fred Friends <newlawlifel @hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 8:18 PM To: Jon Tevlin; Josephine Marcotty; kdiaz @startribune.com; May Yee Chen; nathan.nelson @startribune.com; Warren Wolfe; Lori Sturdevant; Jill Burcum; Jeremy Olson; Forster, Julie; jcoolman @acnpapers.com; Stephanie Hemphill; Rupa Shenoy; msteil @mpr.org; Elizabeth Baier; Scott Neal; Edina Mail Subject: Great Story on the Environment - Edina Attachments: Full Fred EAW petition 140223.pdf Attached is the makings of a great story It involves of a citizens petiton for discretionary environmental review from a group of citizens from Edina for the Pentagon Park Redevelopment project that seeks to use City owned open space for disposal of stormwater run off from the project. See the attached petition delivered to the Environmental Quality Board on Monday. Please call the citizens listed in the petition for any additional information. 1 a Heather Branigin From: Jerry Madison <jm @andersonmadison.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 8:51 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards My wife and I are longtime Patron Members of Braemar Golf courses and the Minneapolis City Courses. We play on average 80 rounds a season. We play two or three rounds a season at. Fred Richards usually at the very end of the season. It is a nice little course but we favor shutting it down if it will strengthen the main Braemar Courses. Times change and difficult decisions have to be made. We favor closing it sooner rather than later to eliminate the agony. Jerry and Janet Madison 7710 Computer Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55435 Heather Branigin From: Laura Hotmail Account <laural96511 @hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:39 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Additional options for Golf Courses Dear Council Members, I wanted to pass along an article in the Star Tribune this week regarding some creative ways other municipal golf courses are utilizing their courses. http: / /www.startribune.com /local /w est/247103631.html Please don't fast track closing Fred Richards. Please vote to keep Fred Richards open on Tuesday. Lets work together as a community for the best uses of Edina's golf operations. Thankyou Laura Schleck c: 612- 865 -7852 1 Heather Branigin From: Tom Kluis <tomkluis @gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:08 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Citizen comment on city golf courses To the Mayor and.members of the City Council I would like to comment on the discussion on the city -owned golf courses. I agree with the plan to convert bred Richards into a park area rather than a golf course and begin renovations and improvements at Bremar. Is it unfair to subsidize Fred Richards in such a huge manner for the benefit of a very small population. A larger and more accessible park is preferred. Finally, I am not opposed to the city selling the land to private development and using the dollars for other items such as 50th and France parking, other parks, a bike trail, infrastructure improvements, and the like. Thank you, Tom Kluis Lyle Circle, Edina MN i Heather Branigin From: Anne Hinrichs <a.hinrichs @msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:19 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Keep Fred Richards OPEN! I have played Fred Richards many times as I filled in on my mom's golf league. I feel like it serves a distinct need here in Edina and, I am sorry to hear, that you are planning on closing it! I feel like this decision is rushed -- have all the options been carefully considered? Have we really done our BEST effort to find ways to increase the traffic at Fred Richards? I would hate to see this course close and certainly wonder what might happen to that land. Please move more slowly and carefully consider all that is at stake. Thanks- Anne Hinrichs Edina Morningside resident i Heather Branigin From: Troy Mason <tmason @rainbowtreecare.com >, Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:14 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Fred Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4tli 2014. There. is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, -up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. Sent from my Whone Heather Branigin From: Greta Mason <gretamason @msn.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:51 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Fred Richards Golf Course Please vote no to closing Fred Richards Golf course on Tuesday March 4th 2014. There is no need to rush the closure of Fred Richards. More public input is needed. The process, up to this point has not been open enough to the public and has been too hasty. Let's begin discussion on how to upgrade Braemar Golf course and keep Fred Richards Golf course open. Greta & Troy Mason 4508 Andover Road 1 Heather Branigin From: Derek Johnson <dereksjohnson @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:16 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Delay on Fred Richards decision Dear City Council, Please vote no to closing Fred Richards on Tuesday March 4th. There is no.need to rush the closure of Fred Richards before there is public input, public discussion and a master plan of the golf courses. This process has not been fair or open. Let's begin the discussion on how we can upgrade Braemar and keep Fred Richards golf course open. Thanks and regards. The Johnson family Edina, MN 1 DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION TEAM Opsis Architecture Arup Engineers, Structural Engineer Keen Engineering, Mechanical Engineer Interface Engineering. Electrical Engineer 2020 Engineering, Civil Engineer JD Walsh & Associates, Landscape Architect Water 1-ec: ,.hnol(:)gy, Aquatics Engineer The Sports Management Group, Programming /Operations Halliday Associates, Food Facilities Mark Day & Associates, Technology Anderson Kriegier, Sic nagca Berschauer Phillips, Contractor Photos courtesy of Michael Mathers Photography Opsis Architecture 920 NW 171" Avenue Portland, OR 97209 503.525.9511 www.opsisarch.com Cascade Park Community Library In 2010, construction was completed on the Opsis Architecture and Johnston Architects designed Cascade Park Community Library directly adjacent to the Firstenburg Community Center. The co- location of the facilities provides numerous efficiencies for systems, from public transportation and parking to utilities, which create a new `civic center' for the recently annexed portion of Vancouver. The building focuses views into stands of large existing trees and captures filtered daylight. The dramatic, sloped wood ceiling reading room, stacks, and checkout are open visually to the surrounding children's area, teen area, and meeting rooms. A large community meeting room features a shared but securable entrance for use when the Library is closed. The children's area includes a curving wood parent perch, a family story room and an outdoor courtyard. The building won the 2010 Community Pride Design Award. �s.: ,:,.C..,.., .. 6 � ! iilllfii��� �� ■ ■ ■ ■ ■IA ■lll�fle�/,� �u� bp Daylight and Ventilation Features Nor 1h U.,- JIiC7,h 2 North Facia , Ali in',ake Radiant Heated Slab E .4 .1 J3`yiir;l ^:t r31`:fJ 'Fr1G`: •..,. . IFIhc- .l•,f.r);'1ir:: !rl(�FJr: %4:!'".I INDOOR QUALITY Ample daylighting, natural ventilation and non -toxic finishes help Firstenburg Community Center provide a healthy environment for the community's health and recreation activities. The design team used the Portland Daylighting Lab's artificial sky to model a variety of monitor and sunshade configuration possibilities, and a three dimensional model simulating air patterns and space temperatures was created in order to refine the natural ventilation systems. These efforts resulted in east - facing roof monitors with windows operated by sensor - activated actuators to provide deep penetration of daylight into the building and natural stack ventilation as well as north facing monitors at the gymnasium to provide natural stack ventilation and throw daylight deep into the building for balanced, glare -free natural light. Air quality is further improved by CO2 sensors and low level trickle vents that ensure sufficient ventilation while minimizing energy loads. Composite wood and agrifiber products specified contain no added formaldehyde and construction materials were specified to avoid volatile organic compounds (VOC's). In the natatorium, low level exhaust and ultraviolet secondary water treatment reduce air -borne chlorine contaminants while fabric duct work can be laundered to maintain a clean air distribution system. 29% , 56% Awards Recycled Materials Of Wood Base used for Construction Building Products are Forest Stewardship 41% Council Certified Regional Materials Manufactured within 500 Miles used for Construction 99.4% Construction Waste was Recycled Northwest Pacific Region AIA Merit Award 2008 Portland Chapter AIA Merit Award 2006 Portland Chapter AIA Sustainable Design Award 2006 ASHRAE Technology Award, 2007 First Place Athletic Business Magazine Facility of Merit Award 2007 Washington Recreation and Park Association Spotlight Award 2007 Vancouver Community Pride Award 2006 MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION Throughout this heavily -used facility, materials have been selected for their durability, beauty, and sustainability. A strong emphasis is placed on natural, non -toxic enduring materials that will be attractive for decades to come, while also eliminating material use altogether when possible. Douglas fir trees, many of which were diseased, were harvested from the site and milled locally for 12,000 board feet of material used as wall paneling, screens, benches and bleacher seats. Other wood, such as the exterior wood rainscreen system that provides durable protection for the building's waterproofing, was constructed with Forest Stewardship Council certified sustainably harvested wood. The bamboo community room flooring and acoustical wall paneling made from perforated wheatboard are quick growing 'rapidly renewable' materials. Recycled materials such as the glass wall tiles used in the locker rooms and natatorium make up nearly 30% of all construction materials used. Use of unnecessary materials was eliminated with the use of exposed steel structure, ground face concrete masonry block walls, and concrete floors, and passive heating and cooling eliminates substantial need for ductwork. Material waste was also considered during construction as the contractor was able to recycle 99.4% of all construction waste. Page _ of )L.•cz-e, n - CGS y.ccc->t mcl •ca►, Q"-5119 ?/h�acdf-� vta� Lrsi�n ter- rs, Gs,A., mc4,f .pt& Ga rK i� PON�.. S mI-k, o-,,_ I wil a M ILI, MOIL= MP04# ��'j FJF NO Cog 0, I %Uwo-, t md 1, mirla, .01 M - 04 �-- IMS 1. 02" EA Noma; , - �i4 • , oLf/7"MA,110 M. Page _ of )L.•cz-e, n - CGS y.ccc->t mcl •ca►, Q"-5119 ?/h�acdf-� vta� Lrsi�n ter- rs, Gs,A., mc4,f .pt& Ga rK F�,!',rint Name Sl nature Email 10 FA. 12 Ilb 50-z 16,,4 �e 14 15 �e'ci C>d Page of -Vt AvI r vcl Page -- of F YO �YvU VA 5A . Cpl / Ema' Print Name Address Si a_ture ew 2 3 /rtes /�2 S 37- v . 4 L -) QJ 5� ��o i��X1C� 4, 5 e-, , f3�f 6 err 53zq ( i ltdcg i 4 fi °o s5 zy � 8 i —D c2 lo CAD '(2c�l(y J� kivc'L --�, 13 14 / , 15 Page -- of F YO �YvU VA 5A . Cpl A � ( F A, *xll Page _ of _ ue 2, CI.� LILA Print Name Address Signature Email 1 7 Ltvi -z_ .c. Lv� 2 Z Un6 -c,4n 3 11�7�f ^f7?A �bl�e 5 6 "V<;tMi 7 8 9. 10 11 12 13 14 15 Page _ of _ ue 2, CI.� LILA Page _ of _ 'l ✓j - � G'�-L7 Print Name Address Signature Email 2 Le �/ t Le - S-te A5 SNIO -mac (Vvki 3 4 5 g 11 �"""/ �41 12 3 1 � J YL � ^(i 14 nv+c�� ✓ n 5,3�r �'�z �I t S h J(. t ��� v�Ltr,� un� t�i�kzr��� °'� 15: L Ll 1 `a uat 1 L.'1s Page _ of _ 'l ✓j - � G'�-L7 Page — of — its 0 ' I � r � .��[ � 111 /e ■ � .�s�►.;.. � . _.. ���� . -, Mail .. �.A.� e � m ffi� 110, falm, Nall. -lik MI Z-4- ., ... m 0 Page — of — f� � ( Fd ",°-� � Vii/ Page _ of _ / f - AOL,Cor N/jeu'/, Cd^ Print Name Address Si nature Email rwt s us 12- e� 11( b 2 3 ��ll Z ��CF�•� _0(_r 4�J n ,ask % ..S �1/ Lf I �; / 1�dr s Kos (-M 014 (SG4S L%; F_ 9 � L4 sat jnl 2C 10 G� 7�S 7 0, c� p✓l' ve - • 1 -7 I� 12 �• C`i�(' d 13 L `��� t L�� �© C\ 14 V 15 SU.f f� � ( Fd ",°-� � Vii/ Page _ of _ / f - AOL,Cor N/jeu'/, Cd^ Page _ of _ ?� ca-wl —� c v �-• . P . Cd n-1 I -Csrv� =�- "4 OIL MIN r - ESA � W-m-4d-- � � " . • ' tea;_ is " e. � _ .� , ,. �. /i�.. I a:= � � • v �,..i _ . _ Page _ of _ ?� ca-wl —� c v �-• . P . Cd n-1 I -Csrv� =�- "4 OIL Page _ of �Wk &oy �- cv-,,j, "e-� RE r-- Print Name Address Signature Email 2 l,�l il��l� �� (��J �UU M 3 A64 cx�,,�-- 4 `)del <I L- :fQl;i�l'�.l( "'Z� 4 I` 16 1`�w Ocr) �' 41� 5 � �'� ,�'� �7 1 w U Vl ✓ry F etlr rkef 7 1 ��?'► fi .55 " cry . r- rrt�r i�r�;r �? 8 O. SC-W ee( C � o j 1 �� /l 10 12 13 14 A Okk 15 6 VdA�l— Page _ of �Wk &oy �- cv-,,j, "e-� RE r-- Page of LIOILAI COT, Print Name Address Signature Email JC,1,6 ,, L17- POM vas- sl,o,, br. 117 Ut 2 elM 2V -[ Li 3 N� 3 ��i cv� Mb 4 5 6 I)o v �Lv,1, 7 ej bA kAe"eA,i4n ezetv 8 9 e5i-, l< 12 13 — - d 14 ---------------- Cot frcgvto t FP6 15 Page of LIOILAI COT, 0 H k- d',,--� /V Al Page — of — l� Cox 1 tie Print Name Address Signature Email 1 �c.�s. � (J`�*'� • � ; �- /Uc, fir" r etn � � e . >+ t 4 % 1? e Of 4 9..-I v+,b�,tr, �va.a6•c ? /9 7 $ Z°� �r 10 r" 2 11 \CNv l - L� n-s q C( ci��e-�n � , � a 12 (+4t,,- �±'c�ra' ►� 2.�?S' u. w 13� 14 15 0 H k- d',,--� /V Al Page — of — l� Cox 1 tie 12. Information from www.edinamn.gov Conclusion: The applicant is petitioning the Environmental Quality Board to, order the preparation of ,a discretionary Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) so that the full impact of this'significant change and physical manipulation of both the project site and City's significant land use conversion in the open space of the Golf Course to a combined, integrated and part of the commercial Pentagon Park development can be thoroughly.- reviewed for its-Cumulative Environmental Affects. This major land. use conversion in the use of the City land will significantly degrade the quality of management of stormwater, air quality, traffic and noise, along with other significant factors. In addition the increase in traffic will endanger local auto and pedestrian traffic. Given the City of Edina's" involvement in the r project the Petitions urge the EQB to consider appointing the 9 -Mile Creek Watershed District as -the RGU for this review. Furthermore, this Project by the City of Edina_ more than meets the threshold for mandatory environmental review as required by Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subpart 36 given the land use. conversions'being proposed by the City. The-formal initiation of the EAW process will lead to the establishment of consistent regulatory guidelines that.will ensure that future generations will .benefit the community as a whole and the developer and future developers and residents of the City. Respectfully Submitted, Ms. Colleen M. Wolf 4408 Guilford Lane Edina, MN 55435 952 - 250 -6669 Page _ of _ J While not part of this application, the petitioners request that the EQB consider the absence of compliance by the City by way of its ignoring the requirements of Minnesota Rules 4410.4300. An EAW must be prepared for projects that meet or exceed threshold of any of the criteria listed in Subparts 2 through 37 of the rule. If the project is an "expansion" of an existing project, like here where the City of Edina is seeking to combine the Fred Richards golf course with the Pentagon Park development, the cumulative total .of the proposed project must be taken into account (e:g. the total 81 acres). Subpart 36 of Minnesota Rule 4410.4300 specifically lists "Land use conversion, including golf courses as one the threshold categories that requires a mandatory environmental review. Previously, the Gateway Alternative Urban Area wide review was completed 2007, but ONLY for the Pentagon Park Redevelopment Project. That study did„ not include the incorporation or intensified use of the Fred Richards golf course and did not address cumulative or sequenced environmental impacts associated with the project.$ Additionally, that AUAR is outdated as it is required to be updated every 5 years. 9 Supporting Evidence: Without an on -site investigation and analysis, the applicant's relied upon information supplied by the City of Edina and the Developer. This information includes: 1. Project Aerial Photo — Exhibit A 2. Staff Report to Edina Planning Commission dated December 11. 2013 — Exhibit B 3. Minutes of the City of Edina for Work Session for Pentagon Park dated April 16, 2013 and minutes — Exhibit C 4. December 6, 2013 Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal — Exhibit D 5. January 17, 2014 Edina Sun Current — Exhibit E 6. Open House Presentation from Hilicrest Development September 2013 — Exhibit F 7. FEMA Flood Insurance Map from City of Edina Website February 2014 — Exhibit G 8. Three Rivers Park District Presentation on Regional Trail Edina Section September 17, 2013 — Exhibit H 9. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Printout of Whats in My Neighborhood from MPCA Website February 2014 — Exhibit I 10. US Environmental Protection Agency Total Maximum Daily Load requirements for Chloride for 9 Mile Watershed district — Exhibit J. 11. Information from www.savethefred.org s See Exhibit B See Exhibit C Page _ of search of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) website accessing "What's in My Neighborhood" data indicated the following sites are identified within or near the project boundary: a. • 1 former CERCLIS /Superfund site b. • 1 abandoned unpermitted dump located west of Tracy Avenue. c. • 5 leaking underground storage tank sites (some with more than one release event) d. -,2a ir permitted sites e. 28 hazardous waste generators (small to minimal quantity) f. 21 tank sites The number, location and size of underground storage tanks have not been provided. Petitioners are also concerned about the proximity and lack of information on the limits of the former France Avenue Dump for the City of Bloomington just to the east and up- gradient of the City's project. Depending on the rain during the time of excavation, Petitioners want to see a plan for the disposal of potentially contaminated rainwater that accumulates on the construction and storage tank sites. There is no plan of which Petitioners are aware that deals with storage, disposal or reuse of polluted soil. Petitioners request an emergency response containment plan be made publicly available. 5. Additional Impacts. Additional impacts from the Project include: a. Wastewater treatment or septic system issues. b. Noise c. Odors d. Visual and Aesthetic Impacts The Proposed Project falls into a Mandatory Category for Environmental Review ' See Exhibit I Page _ of _ property for stormwater from the adjoining redevelopment project and potential violation of the TMDL4 2. Flooding Related Concerns. Petitioners are concerned that the project as proposed will negatively affect the already high water table with issues labeled as Other Flood Areas on the FEMA flood maps published by the City5, pushing water to nearby residential areas in an area with a high water table and history of flooding. Petitioners are also concerned that the previously low areas of .the project land will be graded to a height higher than current conditions thereby affecting nearby residential areas. The City has failed to address or consider these externalities associated with its development. The petitioners are concerned about the potential increase in mosquitoes in the summer associated with this flooding. 3. Wildlife Impacts. Because the project the City is contemplating is in the middle of the nine mile creek watershed district, and because much of the project involves reducing dry land in the same, Petitioners are concerned about the impact on species which migrate through the area. Including the identification of threatened or endangered species including 6: a. Two Blanding's Turtles (Emydoidea 'bla "nding b. One Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrines), c. One Common.Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) d. One Forester's Tern (Sterna forsteri) Petitioners do not believe that the RGU has taken this.matter into consideration. A site survey of these resources should be conducted. 4. Soil contamination, hazardous waste and storage tanks. There is no-indication that a plan dealing with the disturbance of polluted soil has been submitted. It is not known how ground water will be impacted when polluted soil is disturbed. The City should be required to identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and must identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. There is an extensive history of leaking underground storage tanks used for gasoline, heating fuel oil and waste oil in the Project area A 4 See Exhibit J 5 See Exhibit G The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has prepared Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) plate 27053C0452 published on Edina City Website http: / /edinamn.gov /index.php ?section= community- development. 6 See Exhibit H Page _ of _ Clearly the City's project for the Fred Richards Golf Course and the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park Office Complex are Connected and Cummulative as defined in Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1000, subpart 4 and part 4410.2000, subpart 4. These rules specify that an EAW or Supplemental EIS must precede approval of each stage or component of connected projects. The City is attempting to divide these two projects merely to divide up a large system into exempted segments which is not allowed under the rules (parts 4410.1000 and 4410.2000, subparts 4). The Fred Richards portion ofithe connected project cannot be approved or started until the review is completed. Brief Description of Potential environmental effects: The petitioners request an EAW to fully assess the potential for cumulative and sequential significant environmental effects of with the combined City's use intensification and incorporated conversion of the Fred Richards Golf Course into a stormwater drainage and containment system for the development and surrounding area. The project resulting with the physical changes to the adjoin sites contemplated by the City and Developer start . with the closure of the golf course and physical manipulation to change the drainage, grades, and entire appearance and conditions at the site to allow for an area wide redistribution, change or collection and installation of new stormwater control measures, enhanced human interaction and finally environmental damages and changes. The potential impacts include: 1. Stormwater. Clearly the intentional and unintentional changes in stormwater run -off and drainage to the large surrounding the Development and Golf Course given the change in topography and drainage can result in many negative impacts. The project is directly in the middle of and connected hydraulically to 9 -Mile Creek and impacts may occur far from the project site. The intensification of use, reconfiguration and physical manipulation of the. Fred Richards site golf course anticipates a large increase in the water deposited on the Project site as a result of the City's decision to integrate it into the overall plan for the area.3 9 -mile Creek watershed already has a TMDL established by the MPCA for Chloride and the City has failed to address the harm and likely degradation of this important water body based on increased stormwater run -off from the use of the Project 3 See pages identified as A4, A11 and the staff report as part of Exhibit B which show a flooding of the Fred Richards property and incorporation of a large portion of the property for stormwater runoff from the Pentagon Park Development. See also, pages 7 -15 of Exhibit F which shows the planned connection between the two parcels, intensified "Connection" and "Integrated Stormwate►" features on the east side or right hand side of the page. Page _ of PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Project: Conversion of the Fred Richards Golf Course in Edina Project Proposer: Hillcrest Development ( "Developer") and City of Edina ( "City") Name, address, and telephone number of the representatives of'the Petitioners John Stang — pstangecomcast.net 4525 Sedum Lane, Edina, MN 55435 612 -804 -7292 Colleen Wolf - colleenwolfe5(a-)-comcast.net 4408 Gilford Drive, Edina, MN 952 - 250 -6669 Description of the Proposed Project: The City of Edina Project includes the closure, land use conversion and joint repurposing of Fred. Richards Golf Course including inclusion of.the former golf course in the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park office complex along 77th Street in the City of Edina. (See property location on included materials) and closure, land use conversion and repurposing of Fred Richards Golf Course. The total site area is, on information and belief, approximately 81 acres in size based on site renderings published by the developer and information from the City's website about the golf course; and would likely redevelop the entire combined site over the next 2 -15 years in the future. Proposed uses include office, retail, residential, and a hotel and conversion of the City owned golf course into a stormwater drainage area for the development. The Developer is asking the City for a PUD type of Development and inclusion of the golf course for its plans. Which would allow greater flexibility of land uses, amenities, setbacks, pedestrian connection, and closing the Fred Richards Golf to redevelop this City open space into a stormwater drainage and retention system for the development and discussed in the attached materia12. 'See Exhibit A. Z See Exhibit C. Exhibit D and Exhibit E Page _ of _ February 24, 2014 Via Hand Delivery Minnesota Environmental Quality Board c/o Ms. Kate Frantz 520 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, .MN,55155 RE: Citizens Petition for Environmental Review — City of Edina Land Use Conversion Dear Ms. Frantz — Enclosed please find our Citizens Petition for Environmental Review pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1100 including the following for the project listed above: 1. A description of the proposed project; 2. Identification of the project proposer; 3. Identification of a representative for petitioners, including mailing address and telephone number; 4. A brief description of the project's potential environmental effects, including an explanation of how unusual or unique characteristics of the projector its location create a need for an EAW even though no mandatory threshold is exceeded; 5. Material evidence of potential for significant environmental effects because of the project's nature or location; and 6. Signatures of at least 25 individuals, with no -restriction on location of residence, By copy of this letter we have given the project proposer written notice of the filing of the petition. If you have any other questions please contact me using the information on the petition. Sincerely Ms. Colleen Wolfe C. City of Edina, Minnesota Hillcrest Development City of Edina - 4801 3 9j�j A Cn �y U e• e. ..., maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f, preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g, allow for mixing of land uses within a development; encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 2. Applicability /Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: L where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. As highlighted above in bold, the City may require housing to be incorporated into the City of Edina • 4801 W. %h St. • Edina, MN 55424 MEMO ?t� y While, the densities contemplated here are still within the parameters of the AUAR, traffic Would have to.be studied to verify if any, and at what point would roadway improvements would be necessary per the AUAR. PUD GOALS Below are the Code requirements and considerations for PUD. The applicant has pledged to include many of the goals and standards for a PUD. Those include: Sustainable design, living streets concept, improved pedestrian connections, pedestrian oriented design, and lighting, landscaping and creative Stormwater management. D. Procedure for Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to, provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in. appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; C. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; city of Edina • 4801 W. 5&h St. • Edina, MN 55424 * Would require a variance under the current code The most significant change proposed is replacing the residential square footage with non- residential square footage. Within the context of the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), the proposal would shift from Scenario 2, to closer to Scenario 3. (See pages A15 & A35, of the attached AUAR.) Please note on page A35, the square footage proposed, does not exceed the maximum square footage contemplated in the AUAR. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50'h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Standard (1111DD -6) Proposed : PUD . Setbacks - Buildings Front Setback 35 feet + %: foot for each foot the building *50 feet (77th. Street - 12 story height exceeds minimum setback buildings) *35 feet (Viking Drive -12 story buildings) Rear 35 feet +'/z foot for each foot the building 50 feet height exceeds minimum setback Side 35 feet +'/2 foot for each foot the building 50 feet height exceeds minimum setback Setbacks - Parking Structures Front/street 20 feet or the height of the structure 50 feet Building Height 4 stories north of 77" Street *5 stories 12 stories south of 77th Street 12 stories (Heights over 12 stories would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment) Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% - Non - residential Uses *1,777,560 s.f. total proposed 50% - Residential Uses non - residential (includes, 1,881,134 square foot site Burgundy Place, Walsh Title & a 250,000 s.f. hotel) Parking Stalls — Mixed Non Residential: 1,777,560 s.f. /300 = 5,425 Parking detail has not been Development District stalls required calculated at this time Minimum Lot Size 43 acres .43 acres * Would require a variance under the current code The most significant change proposed is replacing the residential square footage with non- residential square footage. Within the context of the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR), the proposal would shift from Scenario 2, to closer to Scenario 3. (See pages A15 & A35, of the attached AUAR.) Please note on page A35, the square footage proposed, does not exceed the maximum square footage contemplated in the AUAR. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50'h St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952 -927 -8861, Fax 952 - 826 -0389 • www.CityofEdi6a.com Date: December 11, 2013 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — Pentagon Park MEMO O e Q, in s 1.t O The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop Pentagon Park along 77th Street. (See property location on page Al.) The total site area is 43 acres in size; and would likely redevelop over the next 2 -15 years in the future. Proposed uses include office, retail, and a hotel. No housing is anticipated at this time, however, that, use is currently allowed on the property, and should - remain as a potential future land use. (See sketch plans including two development options on pages A3 -Al2.) The site is currently zoned MDD -6, Mixed Development District. (See existing overall development plan for Pentagon Park on page A2.) Anticipated land uses for the site all meet the current zoning regulations. Following the sketch plan review by the Planning Commission and City Council, the applicant will follow up with a request to rezone the site to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to allow greater flexibility of land uses, amenities, setbacks, pedestrian connection, and depending on the future use of Fred Richards Golf Course, potential greater connection and integration in this public space. The goal after sketch plan is to obtain a Preliminary Rezoning to PUD of the entire site, along with approval of an overall master_ development plan. Final Rezoning would then be sought, along with the first phase of development, which would likely be the property on the south side of 77th Street adjacent to Highway 100. A compliance table is provided on the following page to demonstrate how the proposed plans would comply with the current zoning of MDD -6, Mixed Development District. Oty of Edina � :r P ' , -s� 'v r di<k t5 S• SFIel;5 1 ::. 'F r. • L' , , .. t:. Y ., . A: ^,. -. t +' . #• i , P 4 ti'vkf k - sqh. 4 - .t_ .t.... Pr i � {Y ..`;i 5. �-f a'�,r Sra i ';y '`q j:. ,, s � Ott Exhibit & i~.$ > M,rr 4 �5`b'' T le Ap �� t .. .u{rt+' n .. si. �' I� '� A,7� 5 � Y - C`x 5• x�' '' ° `1 f �., Vi ?" �. �...' p t :, 1 q'�_ •3,� � tb _ { r qr.. u,,, + �� 8 J , ' � < ?:' � .. r R; '* 1 C ft a •4sfT , � :» r u.� r 1 - f-yy . i !a ::I L a`� • �''.f l; +ct ! Y�+ it } *"A4 of 4 , � 7 u V�� !. V 4 k R afi1M�S and 4 £ aw.0 TM ' -. z c ..t�.s;. �� �.' =' Y i '' ; ;s''i�:. � ae t e, ,�.r,� < r 4 r 3: i ,w•� x ��,f`� -'S h :yt 4F ,:>•� f. C'Y1 �{ 1, 9� ^e', +> �.i„ t ' x 3 1 g `: r<�'' ::.,.:t.y :i,. t r,- - • -, ?'s!O f 3: r,J1,ro, i ��, ..� 1 „� ty d i e a: • ,� �,. s: "C; '�' y � ;r e �S�, a, a x \r& ? n,{� � 'S� °' ��� � q . r � p aa: ➢ fir h �� t + �'� �' �. . �.yx. p ` ' k�.` ��. q ``�..,� �• '�� . �Et ",f. i aa__ °E �j J ' %��''V w `yY u"�;�'. � c . .m.- Vii:. A r-sa,y, Rt ;t - , •+ �' b. r: h",p�',a s «`. :Fax .v- •,,s � � „, � x' ; � . '� ,w~• , S .wt p' �^ - � � �u, Z'irq 30;. • iµ .4. 2` ,.'_,i>' y vyp -.q. t i L, 'E:... _ ;.+j., S ''' ,.r�1} vi , AF -'t q is " ,:;v I ` :, t *.rrm _::�,':s �.�= +. - �:: r �'`.• ,.:. ;� ro K > ,J , rug. {,.t.`:' S:'� ..��r" �F{ kad'$a i T ` ` - , .;1 �.?t{ . t.! • - �6 rt'Jdy r a, i A r }C R. gi.. loss ,. cry, , i + W il\ +t�j6 +' yr 1� , r� a u.kg . l "5. _ "iAp• ,�X S* 3 nfi t r' n7r -'� . 3. -�: � w .,.r .y;. x... ;- -, ,. .. , .. .; .1 .r. .... .�. .,.,k. , vsr -; ... ;',. i il'4� *. -,'� °Yr+ -.a, 1" r t"`rw .' - ,",, t -: �� ,� ... c�••' 7, 5 py ,.,,. :. a, :,,., g ,ffi,,:.,a, .:.:d., ,.� C y .:,,:r., r a a:. 4..,:,, ,,,. ':.. :,;� �_ .r . r+ ^' q<fi,;. , .f•.,..y... ., ,Y '""i �"�`n;*"` ...r a�, SS's k's`.� z r wta � t ..,, . ,.. ;, • ' .' � A { .,arm r '^` ;'' S 'pz , �'s�•a .. .� � � ;3,;,.: ,+5 ;• _:.:.. 4 x.:;' . , } ;- ,::.) ; +,.: ,.', >:; as �., :; rXt a ,y s^a a ;.p, •:.,,n >. Ys. .''r r,^, � u- �.',': ,I' '::;::Y ..,. , py� ,,,. _,: r•� -...: :, -._.. r:• .::. 1 .�1�4r„,I�•: e�%,'4{�':�i .,p^r s.5'zt,: A' �,';c � - .w.G�taL. = "'r', .�-T.•�,rZ ,�'a4�' �;, '+ z•' 't.;x�'Ja o'�';� 4 �'h''.. ,i.. �_ a��r �}i �?�' ."3'� - -,�. or• .,N,t:'' � '..,.t.;"Rs. ,. �i,2:' ,f ,..- „I�a, if'�•bro <>F .;!".tl'' 4 f: . :i, ,..ti... ' :, -> . ,> tl4i.. y: .�5.�. <': �., •. •, .,.: � �, :: 4 -. -,a.. ... g :� 1 -- - .�dk w „���.d�+p' Z.Y :•:;:1 l,�..,_y9 :. . �, ' • ., I & ., .:,�,, . , ,. _ ,t. v. < , x $ rt >a .. ,. - n#i ,,u: . a ,1z. i.w2 . c —e ,- ..r d_ `. n,�4t+�.'.r..a-.. . w C �a .”. a - >. .,rr, .�'x + . �s_m, 7 5 :;'. .r - ..d .. ,1 M ..x( . 4,H,.F. •' ; , � r s t ., ? . . ,.1 ,.... . , K�,: . : .. . _:.,: a.'� . , : - :. ., . . y- ^'?.^. s-; .,.,: .: ,... -.. .. .�.- �n .. ' r :} s « s ,✓ ', .4.,, ,. r.,.r.;_:. . ,,1- ...a , ' : , . : ; : ��>;,x p, N.; T r +? `� ,,!,., ,:,.- .�, P ,..t. :n n. , .x ,.,� ,l,. .�. , . .: h .f F x .,. < .. ,_• , a.:.�. �J. ;r +..;:, a .,':- .,§ $ � e k r :. V •,> :~? ;... . � ��: � r , .,; ._ � � ,:.F_sr . .i, .i. �:� t+'5t-a•,.. : ?:!,�T t , � s ' •r , ' ,-_,�.:w.. .1.:. : ,� ' , .:p'% -� 7 wL . A � . �<) „ p'. .:.:r,`i<, .. "�4 " "y',�Sry`i , - � ,: '. _:. . Sf ;°.,:� ,•'A ?, } G 'w . r � :a h . .Ws. �� , ,' "., ',"{y ' y' r:. � if ' :s ' , � 6 ! !1 4 Y � t@6� '� T : t -� -' .-i t . �{ .� w� w . �•+�,Jy4L::.' !.p: �5f �?EJ, I x V �� „ r $ I'm i i" i 2 .s 1 { 3 1 .4gip.I:,(:.. .,,,.T- � F iy + ^r> t . • : "x '.�( , z 4 = k Z4:g�t ! 5 , "x . - ^{ J}} . 1 5 I h _'T, W p" _51 1k . . n .;. ,�: � r s s::7 �, k i5+1,..:c:rs •�;N , . [ ...x �� . �,. ,c°az, , 4 ✓” a ^.. 4�.: of '.l` , ..R ,: .... ,.. .�,��4.. ,. ..�i.. l�._ , ..,.. �.r+ ., ».�., 11 k' Ii 'Fj -.t �.i4�':t. +; \pM�� ,i.. ,. : .YS.- 1- ...t . , : r_.. t, s. , b.. e Frr"', < 'h4 S +i °' F t ,:�5'` . �... '� >. .. „',y,.. ., ... ;, 4 . N.,,%.. �(iC -v t a: �, _,: ., _..>+$, , a.y , v :..i - , a ..df4:: :.,t:,,tY ..:. k..: .f sf. ... 5p,. F..:a+. ,.,.�` ... %..?�'�,. .JA-- . >,.'.,`u. yy tr ,.. ?',i ,. ..$ .,, .I, ,.. f}I, , _.: 1 _..$ ,•yp}rxF...:...„..,,.,. via a, T •:y:: r`"a `,, - .:. .k. ..., 6. "rF ,:.r:, i�- at � .z - ��,.,, e� "'v. ,+ -.. . ..,Y. ..., r•. .. ,i - � � ,,a e,iµ>°f•;,. , :.. >«.,. $ ,r 's' h ,(�4 ,.:,,:.. °.. ry, ,::..._ ., ..- °,..:-- .,rt. -i, '� .,:: ;�; .tti`.•., f ��a�r. >,.0.:Yr ,. . ,.• t �1�ft1e Eiji W. .. . ! nti y %.. �,i'S 3y,+p .: r ...�. .,.k: :. x ..ak.S.'. ,' �T. :.: %t'^ ... -.; : �' . %w7 .' R.- ,�. .�.,,, _/ .a.,,. ,•rJ`iJ ��`"�•'�..�'ryl,"!�•f� 7 w rti c, -. t . = -.•, r as i � ,. f —�. _. `!r� .. •,a'.: ,.qy .a- ... . >.- ._ :,.. � -il'; 1. >*,p n : �f=. ?:L'�.f �.,� w e ti:,` 4. Y,.. �, J '^. <K. =� " '` ) „: � .:j, , � N r.4i,� b' ..> LL... +4 ':•: 'k§ 1 :Se,v� s. � a* .:�: , : r„ .,, ..�.. ,. ... ,� ,..., t ,'., ,_ ...., �. � 7 �- ��a .�,. .tit •?. . :.; +,/ e.. „ „,1 r7 : -.> . -�,. ,'s �. .. ,. �i`r -.�'�, :.: _. ,.:. ily .:ikd:,.�r,•�.._ :.. �_. _k ,. t',r: a5 5., s :.e =� u': r-1`. p ". 4� �C ,,..,.., :;�,n�„r�r ,:.._. .,�,:. e<:::��va:,F ,q� �'ax IS '♦ t,sa� ii {�..3'� y. (. y -.7 �_ P. a.., d .y. ,,. .':: ��y k, -�. ,., ..-.: :.- :. '.' .:,.. .:. >_x- ... 4e., : � :.: ����"'x?,. :_.•GT .r.: _ , ... .r <'kL::`: ,J, 4 1 =�`i Y..: �ie .:fak 5 - .. ... N.f? ,.. e.Y:.. °J:n'•1,1N 'r V. ,4...,.a$, A,. ,: Y.... ,..� Y'.,. N..a. �` ,, .u� �,: ,. .t ., b:. a��. .!.y. 1 $ °y1 �. ...... ....,) , .. .WS. �... . .. `� , , .... .. , -.i 5 .., �A <',c,�,.r. , �j';•�'.;:,or , {fY �� <� � F. ..+!.•! 'a+4: } ! � i MOMS i . IR - ,., ,ae.,..._, �'k�., ' ,r ,... �•.c .any. :, Grz >5 , -.. :- .pa',, ,� �• .s,:. .t,.. '>a a:•� }'�.;a i.��fy'S ro t .r. t- pit y . -.. �"' ,�,,.r.,'4 ..,. ... ,_ .. , .. r ., �-'r�.&� w.�'•'�Tt -.p d.. .._ .. °t,:y..s c"�: Page _ of_ "6� r v1 l Print Name Address ° Jgnaturq Email , 2 errs�►� �� Gl c��i �k n�� 5 yn �,U,� y I�2k . t. • Wv s ri A tK (5- A /0�O 10 �.,t�,�.. � � �� �� � � . i �.�,; �• �La p � �� � - �_. ,, ant r1 .• 12 �. - b�lYl� Lo`� \� `� �' Jb�v� ( c �Y -a-e� _,C AneAR)paC - Vk �a 13 14 �. Z lil/CP a 15 Page _ of_ "6� r v1 l ■ Print Name ~ '��iy►i � � -���1! ice__ � � _ JL/� • �' .ice -.1 ��Al�• /A- I� ry /V Page _ of _ ',C0Y;� 1+A "u 5 �DM A I < Page — of _ C®� w c Print Name Address Si nature - Email 2 j -lf"O(4 _. 4 anlik bolt .5 6 ? v e. ,- • d ei `J 5 l�/ i7a f eb r.o ,a s; s J 10 Icy ►�I�� f ti K 11 50 13 FoA;r(� C 14 ( ry I (il v A I < Page — of _ C®� w c G �- (( f d t vl-� /U /t Page — of — b o w4 L G✓�l Print Name Address Signature, Email 1 L�r 2 l� �� 700 3 cc ] c t Yiv�4+� r5 Y-6- kq 9�d �� w i� c 5 ' 1 I � `� ► �� � ACC, � � � L� . �� 1�' l I ` �L � -- i ►J G�'1 t . , 6 V \ V l d e[rC, C P 7�r 1�M nv a�ti ( 8 _ 11 sa N Cf� n ski 5��2 5 7� � f o f g -s A,, 11 '4So I P-ef M 12 Si ears Q Gl�r + C I S�+L�Cwce 76 M Urs h n f e r rr! . �,y vv-` &e- S �vt �� erj6Cv G� G 13 /J 5D /G c.e� . (lCG �� 15 S)Ch-b QLqO� ba - G �- (( f d t vl-� /U /t Page — of — b o w4 L G✓�l Page — of — (� VOL I A- )Y� �A x,17 j: Print Name Address na Email 1 �ni� (� k(Ad (A Vi vkc-/ (` (;,,()j c�I(kc fou -n c: � 2 IV; 3 r(�1 r JIf1 0 0L., fv0 14' -uou Y) r Ir j fn` f� �Jr.LvT �✓ �� 5 yea✓ 1 ? , i� �! iC e T V - Gc n, 2 �. 1 C g /"/ / : . � " r l V L / ✓� f ( % ^jy lLL y (I -li 9 10 ��`n C'� V i'U �,Jii' � l �G(in.<< 11i G !�',l�P �LYt'��� 7(/ z / �2•�f a �' C -Cti f ��v 12 h �%�� -✓� '��- S I I ►.r -T�Y T j ,�nc(�i' , 13 l�U T�� -Lt,1 l�l�t`� 15 6 ejA PO , U. �1 ' rf l� ; !J 1p Page — of — (� VOL I A- )Y� �A x,17 j: from the 2007 AUAR was updated to reflect known or approved redevelopment projects within or near the TH 100 and 1 -494 area Table 2 summarizes the known redevelopment plans and updates the 2007 AIIAR in the.area and Figure 5 shows the location of these projects. Tnhlp 2. Snmmarn of Adinrent Redevelnnment Pronosals Cl Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page S Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686.37 June2a13 6 Development Summary of Impacts Duke = Weeks Realty Limited Phase 1 and 2 completed Phase 3 to add an additional 312,000 sq. ft. of office in Partnership the future Norman Pointe Walser Real Estate 11, LLC 50,000 sq. ft, car dealership project completed. Walser Toyota) Addition of 112,000 112 of medical office space completed Ryan Companies phase 1 and 2 completed. Phase 3 to add an additional 250,000 sq. ft. of office in US, Inc. the future. (Marketpoint) Hilton Hotel 256 room hotel and adjoining restaurant completed Normandale 122 space parking ramp to meet demand for existing offices completed . Investments, LLC, Bloomington United Properties 285,000 square foot office building at 8200 Norman Center Drive completed Covington 250 Apartment units - Approved, under construction. Apartments 8100 Office Tower 255,000 ftz of office - future Hotel 100 Rooms - Future Luxembourg 282 Apartment units - Approved, under construction Apartments OATI Office /Data 100,000 ft7 of office - Future Center Venture Bank 37,000 ftz of office - Completed 2009 Ofce Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page S Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686.37 June2a13 6 Storm Water Management: Tile Nine Mile Creek Watershed District adopted updated rules in 2008. Based on these rules, if a redevelopment project disturbs more than 50 percent.of the existing.impervious surface on the parcel (or increases the imperviousness of the entire parcel by more than 50 percent), retention of one inch of runoff from all the impervious surface will need to be provided. Also, peak flow runoff rates cannot exceed the existing conditions for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100 -year storm events and the runoff from a 2.5 -inch storm event from the parcel will need to be treated to'remove at least 60% of the phosphorus and 90% of the total suspended solids. Additionally, Edina Lake, which is north of the project area, was added to the impaired waters list in 2008. Edina Lake is impaired for nutrients /eutrophication. No TMDL study has been completed to date. Transportation: The AUAR completed in 2,007 analyzed the impacts of the four development scenarios for the years 2014 and 2030. The analysis for both years, assumed a 1% per year growth in general background traffic, the approved development in the Cities of Bloomington and Edina (see Cumulative Impacts) and the proposed Gateway Development traffic. Updated traffic counts were conducted the week of April 1, 2013 at selected intersection and roadway segments on 77th Avenue. The updated traffic counts were then compared to those assumed in the 2007 AUAR to determine if the analysis and recommended mitigation measures were still valid. The peak hour traffic counts ranged froin 5% to 15% less than those counted for the base; year in the AUAR in 2007. In addition, the 2013 counts were 6S% to 75% less than'the 2014 Scenario 1 condition, which had the smallest associated trip generation. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) counts used as a baseline in the AUAR were from the 2005 MnDOT State Aid counts. In 2009 these counts were updated and in general, these counts were at or slightly lower than those in 2005. The 2013'ADT counts compared to the 2009 ADT counts showed a slight increase (10 %) on the section of 77th Street from TH 100 to Parklawn Avenue. Based on the facts that 1) no Gateway Development has occurred in the area, and 2) the majority of the additional development has been in Bloomington and Edina and their lraffic.generation included in the new 2013 traffic counts, and 3) the area traffic levels have not changed significantly from those assumed in the AUAR for the baseline conditions (see Cumulative Impacts), it can be concluded that the future year analysis and recommended mitigation is still valid. Cumulative Impacts: The Study Area and its surroundings are within a,first -ring suburb of Minneapolis that is generally fully developed. Cumulative .impacts will generally be driven by either individual parcel redevelopment or area -wide redevelopment. To analyze cumulative impacts for the Study Area, the information Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 4 Gateway 5tu4 area Oty of Edina, MN tt WS8 Project No. 1686-37 p.6 June 2013 J Leaking Underground Storage Tank (,LUST ) Sites • MPCA Leak #4105 - Pentagon Office Park located at 4930 West 77th Street, Edina, MN 55435. This site has been issued site closure by the MPCA. Site closure indicates that the contamination, if present, has been investigated and determined to not pose a threat to human health or the environment. Note: site closure does not indicate that the site is free of contamination. • MPCA Leak #627 - Pentagon Office Park located at West 771h Street, Edina, MN 55435. This site has been issued site closure by the MPCA. • MPCA.Leak # 617 - Roberts Automatic Products located at 4451 West 76th Street, Edina, MN 554.35. This site-has been issued site closure by the MPCA. Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Sites a MPCA VIC #28660 - Hillcrest Development located at 4530, 4540, 4550, 4570, 4600, 4640, and 4660 West 771h Street, Ldina, MN 55435. 0 MPCA VIC 429410 - Hillcrest Development located at 4510, 4815, and 4901 West 771h Street and 7600 Parklawn Avenue, Edina, MN 55435. MPCA VIC #2890 - Parklawn located at 7625 Parklawn Avenue, Edina, MN,\ 55435. MPCA VIC 413540 - National Rental Car located at 7700 Fiance Avenue, Edina, MN•55435. Petroleum Brownfields Sites • MPCA PB #4182 - Hillcrest Development located at 4530, 4540, 4550, 4570, 4600, 4640, and 4660 West 776 Street, Edina, MN 55435 (also a VIC site). • MPCA PB #4239 - Hillcrest Development located at 4510, 4815, and 4901. West 771h Street and 7600 Parklawn Avenue, Edina, MN 55435 (also a VIC site). Wastewater System: The AUAR analyzed the wastewater system in the area, including the Metropolitan Council's interceptor, BN -499. Since the 2007 AUAR, a wastewater project was completed in the area. Asa result of the AUAR and potential re- development anticipated within the study area, the City of Bloomington, in conjunction with Met Council, upgraded Lift Station 10 (MCES L -55) to a near -term capacity of 1.8 million gallons per day (mgd). Project improvements also involved constructing a new 16 -inch forcemain to replace the existing 12 -inch forcemain in West 841h Street in Bloomington providing a long -term capacity in the forcemain of 4.8 mgd. Inter- community flows from Edina have been - redirected to the new forcemain, essentially bypassing the gravity portions of MCES Interceptor BN -499 to provide additional capacity for re- development in Bloomington. Water Supply System: No changes to the water supply system have occurred in the area. Knal Alternative Urban Aremvide Review Update' Page 3 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -37 June 20]3 for review on the City's web -site at http/ /edinanin.gov /index Rhp? section = community- develol2meiit- plannine. 11. Approved Development /Current Conditions No redevelopment has occurred within the study area. Figure 3 shows the aerial photo for the site. In 2008, the City updated their Comprehensive Plan. However; Scenario 1 is still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1I1. Areas Remaining to be Developed No redevelopment has occurred within the study area. The initial potential redevelopment that triggered the initial AUAR in 2007 did not come to fruition. Recently, there has been renewed interest -in redevelopment of the area. The redevelopment plans are within or:below the densities analyzed in the AUAR. Timeline: The 2007 AUAR anticipated redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quad areas (approximately 39 acres) to begin in 2008 and be completed within 5 -7 years. The remaining 96 acres did not have a specific timeline for redevelopment. This redevelopment has not occurred. The current estimate for redevelopment timeline for the area is 5 -10 years. IV. Update to the Environmental Review Wildlife: The DNR Natural Heritage Database was reviewed to provide an update for any threatened and endangered species. This review and DNR correspondence is included in Appendix B. There are no new incidents of rare or endangered species within the study area. Contamination and Past Land Use: Public MPCA database information was reviewed to update this section of the AUAR to identify verified or potential hazardous substances and petroleum release sites associated with the project area or surrounding area. The following databases were reviewed as part of this investigation; • MPCA "What's in My Neighborhood ?" website search • MPCA Storage Tank Leak site webs ite search Twenty -nine database listings were identified for the project area. Some of the identified sites were listed on more than one database and the majority of the listings were for small quantity hazardous waste generator (15) and tank sites (7). Inclusions . on these databases do not directly indicate an'environmental hazard and no spills or mishandling of hazardous waste was identified during the review. However, the following database listings for the project area were determined to directly indicate historic or current environmental contamination: Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page l Gateway Study Area City of Edina, AIN WSBProJectNo.1686.37� June 2013 I. Introduction and Purpose The Gateway Study Area (Study Area) is approximately 135 acres. The Study Area is bounded by Minnesota Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) on the west; France Avenue on the east; 761h Street West and Fred Richards Golf Course on the north; and Edina's border with Bloomington on the south. The area is shown on Figures 1, 2, and 3. The Study Area currently contains a mixture of light industrial /warehouse, commercial, office and residential uses. There is a total of 1,904,000 gross square feet (gsf) of these uses in the existing conditions. The City of Edina adopted the Final AUAR on November 5, 2007. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 441.0.3610 Subp. 7, for the AUAR to remain valid as the environmental review document for the area, the document needs to be updated every five years until all development in the study area has received final approval. Since redevelopment has not occurred in the study area and the AUAR expired in November 2012, the purpose of this document is to update the AUAR pursuant to Minnesota Rules. The 2007 AUAR included an analysis of the following development scenarios (Figure 4 -1 to 4 -4): Scenario 1- Comprehensive Plan Scenario 2 Master Plan Scenario Scenario 3 - Maximum Commercial Build Scenario Scenario 4 Maximum Residential Scenario Table 1: Summary of Redevelo ment Scenarios In 2008, the City updated their Comprehensive Plan. However, Scenario 1 is still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This AUAR Update serves as an update of the 2007 AUAR, and includes a review of the areas that have and have not developed, an update to the environmental analysis as needed, and a review of the mitigation measures. The original 2007 AUAR is available Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 1 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSR Project No. 1686-37 I June 2013, 1 Existing Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comprehensive Master Plan Maximum Maximum Plan Commercial Residential Office 1,546,000_ 1,862,000 3,261,000 1,094,000 Commercial / 15,000 174,000 15,000 15,000 Retail Hotel 1,873,000 Office & Light 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 Industrial Mix Residential 1 31,000 1 31,000 914,000 31,000 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1 1,904,000 1 2,888,000 1 4,246,000 1 4,603,000 1 3,986,00() In 2008, the City updated their Comprehensive Plan. However, Scenario 1 is still consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This AUAR Update serves as an update of the 2007 AUAR, and includes a review of the areas that have and have not developed, an update to the environmental analysis as needed, and a review of the mitigation measures. The original 2007 AUAR is available Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 1 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSR Project No. 1686-37 I June 2013, 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET.- ...... TABLE OF,, CONTENTS I. Introduction and Purpose .......................................................... ....................:.........1 II. Approved Development /Current Conditions ......................... .....................:........2 III. Areas Remaining to be Developed ............................................ ..............................2 IV. Update to the Environmental Review ...................................:.. ....................:.........2 V. Mitigation Summary and Update .............................................:... ..............................7 VI. AUAR Update Review .................................................................. .............................14 List of Figures Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 USGS Location Map Figure 3 Aerial Photo Figure 4 -1 Scenario 1 Figure 4 -2 Scenario 2. Figure 4 -3 Scenario 3 Figure 4 -4 Scenario 4 Figure 5 Adjacent Developments Appendix A - Figures Appendix B - Agency Correspondence Final Alternative UrbanAreawlde Review Update Gateway Study Area City of &ding, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -37 1 i i FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW UPDATE GATEWAY STUDY AREA - UPDATE FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Original AUAR: September 2007 Update 1: June 2013 WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue - Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 763 - 541 -4800 Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Gateway Study Area City of Edina, 01N WSB Project No. 1686 -37 Prepared By: ALJ City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 826 -0460 - z+,'re.� -`Yr :.c -rater •yw.�.,a .w� tx�xn�:�rnrae� �' 1K ,� f ?° �+ y6 ` :` .,�$, �w � ,r9r� �itYY Yf c- iV TI,1, 7'7 s � •- n '• � ri d�a( �I n� ( I J f { 5� >,ky yu v wY �.... � I� �� L r' � ups }w •� Y� � ' .I `i� �•.��_ i W ^�"Ci �� -. :; � .. v�Lre� r. - , — _ I ati ` •".� 't r i`9 i�''y I, i A i 1 g� 4 1 7nP S A7 .`�,. •- «ka....�. 9 � sr _ I 't t �,7 � •. .� Y a a' t tiJ i �, ` b � .�,""�^�.. 1 1•��l"1 �d. � � a �,, a � �A¢,'. - F" Yee i J�:�aa so ti , .'� ..T. .�, i _ Tyr-]% i ...... I JJ ,- r,f•Lt r 1AI i T I p vt a1.. i 4p J, Arm p��,f�, ( jI(y[(1• ■4{y j,, 1 1�y y�yry. � �{ q� ,r�� .' (, il.i!.7i r.�Y! �. � �a�.. .,is� � :. Y 1 f.�(�iAe. !.l �4�1 .��1 ,. '.. • �Ir, ... t}i• W_ Y.1 .(j 1laY•i", a�l .'..1 _ - - _ — - ,..,� _ _ l INTERNAL STREET CONCEPT PLAN±` w DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES 808 CLOSE STUDIO, LLC KEY ELEMENTS 6O1.1levard • Sidewalks • Decorative fighting • Shade trees • Parking bays .'7 INTERNAL STREET CONCEPT SECTION 6' 10' F 12' 12 10 6' Y 6' boulevard parking travel lane travel Wne parking boulevard sidewalk roadway R.O.W. ROADWAYTYPES EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER 6, 2013 ' - - �z *I 6' 10' F 12' 12 10 6' Y 6' boulevard parking travel lane travel Wne parking boulevard sidewalk roadway R.O.W. ROADWAYTYPES EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER 6, 2013 GREEN STREET CONCEPT PLAN a F- DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES BOB CLOSE STUDIO, LLC KEY ELEMENTS • Parallel parking • 6'boulevards /6'sidewalks • Decorative lighting • Street trees I � GREEN STREET CONCEPT SECTION 6' 6' 10 12' 12' 10' 6' 6' sidewalk boulevard Parking travel lane travel lane parking boulevard sldewalk roadway 68' R.O.W. ROADWAY TYPES EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER 6, 2013 SUPPORTING STREET CONCEPT PLAN i�: im -ti ra 6' 10, 10' 1 12' 0 1T - 10 — 6 parking travel travel lane parking boulevard sidewalk sidewalk boulevard pT 44' roadway 76' FLOA DAMON FARBERASSOCIATES ROADWAYTYPES 808 CLOSE STUDIO, LLC EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER 6,2013 .gyp. PARKWAY CONCEPT PLAN PARKWAY CONCEPT SECTION KEY ELEMENTS • Decorative lighting • Street trees • G'sidewalk with 10' boulevard • One lane of traffic in each direction • Parking bays for parking r 10' 10' 10' 12' 12' 70' 10' 6' 6 regional trnil boulevard parking travel lane a travel lane ® parking o— boulevard ;sidewalk 44' roadway 80' R.O.W. ROADWAY TYPES EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER b, 2013 i.;'n Z. F d, PARKWAY CONCEPT SECTION KEY ELEMENTS • Decorative lighting • Street trees • G'sidewalk with 10' boulevard • One lane of traffic in each direction • Parking bays for parking r 10' 10' 10' 12' 12' 70' 10' 6' 6 regional trnil boulevard parking travel lane a travel lane ® parking o— boulevard ;sidewalk 44' roadway 80' R.O.W. ROADWAY TYPES EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER b, 2013 DAM O N FARBER ASSOCIATES 808 CLOSE STUDIO, LLC KEY ELEMENTS - Center median with small accent trees • Leftturn lanes • Boulevard /sidewalks • Decorative lighting Shade trees - Transit shelters - Street lights - Pedestrian lights ,� 12' 12' varles' 12' 12' 10' 6' sidewalk boulevard travel lane travel lane median travel lane travel lane bou{evard sidewalk O exlsting O R.O.W. ROADWAY TYPES EDINA, MN • NOVEMBER 6, 2013 Key Statistics DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES BUILDING HEIGHTS BOB CLOSE STUDIO, LLC EDINA, MN - DECEMBER 6, 2013 C3 0 Land Use Structured Parking South Parcel: Hotel - 375 - 425 Rooms A 11400 STALLS W7MST Office - 500,000 GSF 8 1,400 STALLS — Regional Trail 11111111 Parkway Retail - 25,000 GSF C 800 STALLS = Supporting Streets m Green Streets iiiiiiiii Internal Streets North Parcel: Office - 900,000 GSF 0 800 STALLS C=j Wilding Water Retail - 15,000 GSF E 800 STALLS m Underpass CY 250' 500' EM Transit Shelter (1) Monuments Retail/MedicaVOffice - 20,000 GSF F 1,200 STALLS Building Heights (*12+ Story 0 M 12 Story �, !�', %, BM Story 4 Story 2 Story FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE.. BURGUNDY . . . . . . . . . PLACE WAL5H BARR ENGINEERING K DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES BUILDING HEIGHTS BOB CLOSE STUDIO, LLC EDINA, MN - DECEMBER 6, 2013 C3 0 W7MST — Regional Trail 11111111 Parkway = nth = Supporting Streets m Green Streets iiiiiiiii Internal Streets Parking C=j Wilding Water Open Space m Underpass CY 250' 500' EM Transit Shelter (1) Monuments Key Statistics Land Use Structured Parking South Parcel: Hotel - 375 - 425 Rooms A 1,400 STALLS Office - 500,000 GSF B 1,400 STALLS Retail - 25,000 GSF C 800 STALLS North Parcel: Office - 900,000 GSF D 800 STALLS Retail - 15,000 GSF E 800 STALLS NG� F 1,200 STALLS P� 1 iyl FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE • .., ''`'" ° ' BARRENGINEERING Regional Trail �- Trail Connection SltM Parkway 77th WO Supporting Streets ® Green Streets Internal Streets tara Parking O Building t':'^! Water Open Space "U d BURGUNDY PLACE WTR ® JP fi •,fI a�� r DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES PRELIMINARY PLANNING COMMISSION 808 CLOSE STUDIO, LLC TIF DIAGRAM 00 i {0,,N - -- EDINA, MN - NOVEMBER 6, 2013 W 76TH ST n erpass 0' 250' 500• rM Transit Shelter I Monuments �J Key Statistics Land Use Structured Parking South Parcel: Hotel - 375 - 425 Rooms A 1,400 STALLS Office - 500,000 GSF B 1,400 STALLS Retail - 25,000 GSF C 800 STALLS North Parcel: Office - 900,000 GSF 0 800 STALLS Retail - 15,000 GSF E 800 STALLS F 1,200 STALLS •t 4 0 o_ r 0 0 r DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES BOB CLOSE STUDIO, LLC PRELIMINARY PLANNING COMMISSION TIF DIAGRAM OPT10i" 1. EDINA, MN -NOVEMBER 6, 2013 -- Regional Trail Trail Connection ® Parkway = 77th M Supporting Streets —Green Streets *^' Internal Streets an Parking O Building r;v Water �:.A Open Space Underpass H3^ Transit Shelter p Monuments QA W 76 2 36 6 d W 76TH Sr �j 0' 250• 500' - T yam. may. � ° • - '" y . AW.AIR, -6l a it r �y.•_"k., - '! ' ;�C",i • � ;� ' f � �'s "`'�° ^^�atscti�+r�. c =��+i� I 1 ' _ - �" - - ` yVil - �� � l ra� � � .....,. �f�" C P 'tom t°- • , .. a•I�r. +r^ , . _ 0 125 250 ACTIVE PHASE PROPOSED BUILDING EX ISTING BUILDING SCALE IN •�,, +}iii' -.: ,JI �. FT- A. �R WESTPARIGNG 43 EAST BUILDING (4 -11 STORIES: 80,007) gsf 6 LEVELS 360,000 gsf 150 ROOMS 1.200 STALLS ,�;�S EAST PARKING flu ` K- TOWNHOME 1 TOWNHOME 2 6 LEVELS &OALL NNE rpm I I 95 7600 PARKLAWN 18 UNITS 18 UNITS — 1,200 STALLS 85,632 gsf 9 (a INDEPENDENT LIVING 1s INDEPENDENT LIVING 2 ASSISTED LIVING 2 E7 97 BURGUNDY PLACE O 122 UNI S 122 UNITS 103 UNITS F 36 UNITS USE) 0 16,560 gsf o �q ASSISTED LIVING 1 TOWNHOME 3 (El IS T 044 18 WALSH TITLE UNITS 21,000 gsf (OFFICE) WEST BUILDING (410 STORIES) .ica INDEPENDENT LIVING 3 377,375 gsf (OFFICE) 6Y 122 NITS (Hiller dunwiddle �l K'ImleyHom „yam, .— m. ^�•'•�'"� ^� '',mum m"I Nb.low and Associates. Inc. � EDINA GATEWAY taut no., Itnuutx ,w Pentagon Patio Redevelopment PROPOSED SRE PLAN IbtbA,7p'vd SbmlSdrlW peyyw. ,90 EOIKAGATEWAY- COMPLETE PROJECT S -2.P a,�,,,�,NH suol•;� way :aa Propo�cmt, Lac.. R�ZOning and Overall Plan (2017) R331MIUM I Wf !72 a. "Zat '140 a ' cm of aCO6?rvo7o ENO m 'm— of . . . . . . . . . . iG o?) :� (, j N I �I�.j� fir. 1 � -_ � � c� r=te; '•.� - r ., } � �•K a �`r-x a " -•r Y> 100 f 0 -rz a 1NNESOTA DRIVE Its_;; C j �I CITY OF 8LO MIM GTOON f I well Lake Eclifia m FA 71k AN a 'ia aw aw % LU Iowa— U1 0 .4 m ap 10 P Gateway Study Area Figure 2 USGS Location Map Gateway A UAR IIIP'N ,.• °1!! -i AL 0 500 1,000 WSB Feet & Al iam. Mr. PAN min F " 'ia aw aw % LU Iowa— U1 0 .4 m ap 10 P Gateway Study Area Figure 2 USGS Location Map Gateway A UAR IIIP'N ,.• °1!! -i AL 0 500 1,000 WSB Feet & Al iam. Mr. 'I � +see• �� 'p t.�• + 'I'� '{�;'ti • t ••�� p l a� t• i �: ° ! i�� .: �(� • '� fly! �= r 4 IV, .y ••' , • .' All — =tea— — •�' � - -}�� ;� • �\ ; Q, Va Q r.r . 1t' ♦ a . J �• f �' �I . JP w06 . a r 1 0 - Il Figure 1 Leaend Location Map Gatewa � Project Location AUAR • y . 1 52 + •i 0 4 8 „ two Miles WSB 'f V +. 1 � f` •. ' .� ' � irk 52 + •i 0 4 8 „ two Miles WSB Appendix A— Figures would include upgrading the existing transit facilities, including bus shelters, to become ADA compliant and improving the sidewalk and /or path connections in and around each redevelopment. H. Odor, Noise, and Dust H 1. During construction activities, the project proposer and contractor shall observe all dust control Best Management Practices for fugitive dust. H2. Edina will limit construction activities and any other activities that produce noise audible outside the perimeter of a property to between 7:OOAM to 9:OOPM Monday through Friday and between 83,OOAM and 7:OOPM on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. H3. Noise mitigation will be necessary if any residential units are constructed near Receptor 2, located in the southwest quadrant of TH 100 /West 77th Street. Any residential buildings should be constructed using noise abatement methods. Noise abatement requirements to conform to state standards can be found in Minn. Rules 7030.0050, subp. 3. 1. Archaeological; historical, or architectural resources 11. Prior to redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites that would require razing of the existing structures; an evaluation and documentation of the historical and architectural significance of the sites will be needed by the project proposer. This information will need to be submitted to Edina. J. Cumulative Impacts j 1. Edina will work with Bloomington and potentially participate in a regional traffic study that will assist in anticipating future potential redevelopment within the TH 100/1 -494 area and plan for infrastructure improvements. Edina will also coordinate with other entities to address cumulative impacts. These items have been addressed in other areas of the AUAR and include mitigation plan items D1, D6, E8, F1, and F2. VI. AUAR Update Review This AUAR Update has been reviewed pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.3610 Subp. 7. The Gateway Study Area AUAR will remain valid for an additional five years from the City Council adoption date. Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 14 Cate6vgv Study Area City of Edina, MN WSR Project No. 1686.37 fune2W jCU 9 G2. Scenario 2 Scenario 2 will require all the improvements listed above in addition to the following: Intersection: Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Improvement: Dual westbound left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Eastbound dual left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Intersection: Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Add 150 foot eastbound.right turn lane on West 7711, Street Intersection: Computer Avenue / West 77th Street Improvement: Northbound dual left turn lanes on Computer Avenue Intersection: Minnesota Drive / West 771h Street/ Johnson Avenue Improvement: Southbound dual left turn lanes on West 7701 Street G3. Scenario 3 Scenario 3 will require all the above improvements listed under Scenarios 1, 2, and 4 in addition to the following: Intersection: Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Intersection: France Avenue / West 781h Street improvement: Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 781h Street Interchange: TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Six -lane section from Metro Boulevard to Computer Avenue Dual left turn turns atboth 1 i 100 [tamps (Hence an eight- lane bridge) G4. General The mitigation measures discussion above (G1- G3) are needed to address full build -out of the site and surrounding area. Specific mitigation measures required for proposed development plans will be established through traffic and transportation studies required for each development proposal. These proposals will need to document compliance within the AUAR and mitigation plan. G5. Transit /Non - Motorized Transportation As redevelopment occurs in the Study Area, consideration of site - specific improvements needs to be included as developments are proposed. These Final Atternative Urban Aremvide Review Update Page 13 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686-37 June 2013 _ _ l F5. In conjunction with redevelopment activities, Edina will determine the I of the existing sanitary sewer pipe within the Gateway Study Area to determine if repairs or replacement is necessary based on in -place pipe condition and infiltration potential. G. Traffic and Transportation G1. Scenarios 1 and 4' The following mitigation strategies are needed for Scenario 1 and 4 to accommodate future full development traffic projections: Intersection: France Avenue / West 7611, Street Improvement: Extend one southbound thru lane on France Avenue to create a total of four thru lanes Intersection: France Avenue / West 781h Street Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on West 78th Street Southbound lanes approaching the 1-494 ramps restriped to provide exclusive lanes to both westbound 1 -494 and eastbound 1 -494. The right lane will drop at the westbound I -494 ramp'providing an exclusive ramp lane. The second lane will also be an exclusive lane leading to 1- 494 eastbound, reducing the weaving and stacking of vehicles that occur today. The County has expressed interest in participation. intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / West 7811, Street_ Improvement: Eastbound dual left turn lanes on West 7801 Street Intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / Metro Boulevard Improvement: Add southbound right turn lane on Metro Boulevard, restriping the existing two southbound lanes to accommodate an exclusive left turn lane, and a thru /left lane, providing dual left turn lanes. Add 300 foot eastbound left turn lane on Edina Industrial Boulevard Intersection: Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Add 150 foot northbound right turn lane on Frontage Road Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 7711, Street Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Gateway Study Area Oty ojGdlno, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -37 June 2013 A�N the Study Area will be required to meet any mitigation and pollutant load reductions that may be outlined within the TMDL studies. Update: This mitigation measure also applies to Edina Lake. E10. The project proposer will review and determine which Low Impact Development (LID) practices are feasible to be used for each parcel. Edina will review the LID.techniques.and encourage their use to the greatest extent possible. E11. A maintenance plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for privately constructed and maintained storm water management facilities. F. Wastewater Mitigation Plan F1. Any redevelopment activities that may increase the total sanitary sewer flows within Service Area A beyond threshold limits for peak capacity will require upgraded facilities within the Gateway Study Area (Computer Avenue sanitary sewer) and Bloomington (MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10) to accommodate increased flows. Update:-Bloomington Lift Station -No.. 10- is-also denoted at MCES Lift Stadon L- -- 55. In 2011, the pumps in the existing lift station were upgraded to provide a near -term peak capacity of 1.8 million gallons per day (mgd). Future increases in flow for re- development will need to be evaluated as the final lift station site is proposed to be relocated with the proposed future realignment of 1 -494. F2. Edina, Bloomington, and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will continue discussions and analysis regarding proposed capacity upgrades to Bloomington Lift Station No. 10 and the MCES BN -499 Interceptor along West 84th Street in Bloomington. Update: Capacity to L-55 (Bloomington LS 10 was increased to a peak flow of 1.8 MDG as previously discussed. Also in 2011,The MCES BN -499 interceptor was replaced with a 16 -inch forcemain from L -55 southerly and westerly along W. 841h Street to a gravity sewer approximately 600 feet west of France Avenue. The forcemain was designed to carry peak flows for the proposed redevelopment area. F3. Edina will complete its update to their Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. F4. Edina will upgrade Lift Station No. 22. Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 11 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, NN WS8 Project No. 1686.37 ) June 2013 D� D6. There is potential for areas that redevelop within the Bloomington service area to request to;be served by Edina. If this occurs, additional,analysis and water main improvements will need to be completed by Edina in coordination with Bloomington. D7. Individual redevelopment may require the installation of service pumps to serve multi -story buildings and to provide adequate fire protection. The size and type of pumps will vary based on individual building,characteristics, should meet the existing local building and fire protection codes, and will be the responsibility of the developer. E. Water Quality and Quantity E1. Redevelopment projects will be required to be.designed to meet the policies of the most current Edina Comprehensive Storni Water Management Plan. E2. Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Nine Mile Creels Watershed District requirements. E3. Redevelopment within the Study Area will be required to limit peals runoff rates to at least existing conditions and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. E4. Redevelopment needs to reduce the amount of impervious surface within the project limits or develop a site specific storm water management plan that shoves that the project will not impact downstream pollutant or volume loading. ES. If warranted by Edina's Nondegradation Plan, project proposers will need to include storm water management strategies that reduce the total suspended solid loadings, total phosphorous pollutant loadings, and storm water runoff volumes from the Study urea. E6. Any redevelopment project that disturbs more than one acre of land is required to develop a SWPPP and obtain an NPDES permit from the MPCA. E7. Edina and project proposer(s) will investigate the expansion of the existing ponding.areas within the Fred Richards Golf Course to provide additional storage.and treatment as outlined in Edina's Water Resource Management Plan E8. The Cities of Edina and Bloomington will petition the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to expand the South Pond (SP-1) pond to provide additional storm water- treatment for the area. E9. As Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies are completed for Nine Mile Creek, the results of these studies will be reviewed by Edina. Redevelopment in final Alternative UrbanAreawide Review Update Page 10 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, b1N WSB Project No. 1686 -39 ] t� June 2013 W [ potential for subsidence. The plan will need to be submitted to Edina, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and DNR for review and /or approval. C. Fish, Wildlife, Wetlands, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources . Cl- Buildings to be removed as part of redevelopment will be field checked by the project proposer to determine if there are nesting Peregrine Falcons on the structure. If falcons are noted nesting on the structure, the site cannotbe disturbed until the juvenile birds have fledged and left the nest C2. The project proposer will be required to delineate wetlands within their project boundaries, if any, and review these delineations with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Edina to determine jurisdictional status. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is the Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act and will review and verify any wetland delineations. C3. If wetland impact is proposed, the project proposer will be required to minimize impact to the maximum extent possible and mitigate for any unavoidable impacts in conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act. D. Municipal Water Use and Service D1. Edina will work with Bloomington to determine the needs for water system capacity improvements, water main upgrades, and future service to the Gateway Study Area. D2.. In conjunction with their Comprehensive Plan update, Edina will complete an update to the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis for the entire city to determine what current and future water system improvements may be necessary to continue to serve the City's water needs and maintain a water system firm capacity above the maximum daily water use within the City. D3. As redevelopment occurs, Edina will complete an analysis of the water mains within the Study Area to determine if performing water main replacement is necessary and if it should occur in conjunction with other potential infrastructure improvements, such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation improvements. D4. Any abandoned wells found within the Study Area will be seated in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health guidelines. This will be the responsibility of the project proposer. D5. In accordance with Edina's Wellhead Protection Plan, continued protection of the existing Drinking Water Supply Management Areas located within the Study Area will be required for redevelopment projects. Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 9 Gateway Study Area City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686.37 f j d 1� June 2013 A B6. During construction, the project proposer and their contractor will implement Best Management Practices as needed to prevent erosion and sedimentation of downstream water resources. B7. Edina will develop a „SWPPP and obtain an NPDES permit for the construction of any public infrastructure improvements (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main) that disturb one acre of land or more. B8. Edina will conduct erosion control inspections during construction. B9. Project proposers will make environmental hazard investigation documents, such as Phase I Environmental Assessments, available to Edina. B10. Project proposers .1 be required to remediate any contaminated soils encountered in conformance with MPCA regulations. B11. Project proposers will be required to remove and properly dispose of trash and debris "located within aproject site, including all demolition materials that may include asbestos. 1312. Municipal waste hauler companies will make residential and commercial recycling programs available to the Study Area. General municipal waste will be removed by these waste hauler companies. B13. The NP DES Construction Site permit requires a site specific SWPPP to be completed for the construction by the project proposer. This SWPPP is required to include pollution prevention management measures for solid waste and hazardous material spills that occur during construction. 1314. Mitigation includes conformance with the Edina spill response plan. Spills will be reported to the fire chief and /or applicable City Staff. The fire chief and /or applicable City Staff will in turn notify any other appropriate officials depending on the nature of the spill. B15. Project proposers will be required to develop a temporary dewatering plan for construction activities, review this plan with Edina and Nine Mile Creels Watershed , District for approval, and conform to the dewatering requirements of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and NPDES Construction permit. B16. Jf a redevelopment project involves permanent dewatering for underground facilities, a detailed dewatering plan is required to be developed by the project proposer, This plan would include anticipated dewatering amounts, direction of discharge, analysis of impact on adjacent ponds and downstream receiving waters, and impact on the organic material within the Study Area for the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 8 Gateway Study Area City ofEdina, MN WSB Project No. 1686.37 June 2013 1, V. Mitigation Summary and Update Many of the mitigation measures outlined in the 2007 AUAR still remain valid. The updated mitigation measures are outlined below and either remain in effect from the 2007 AUAR or have been updated based on new analysis as noted. A. Land Use Compatibility and Permitting Al. The proposed change in land use of Scenarios 2, 3, and 4 at the Pentagon Towers and.Pentagon Quads site will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. A2. Any redevelopment will be required to meet Edina zoning requirements. A3. Any project proposers will be required to obtain any necessary approvals and permits. A4, if components of a proposed project exceed Edina City Code requirements, variances from the City's requirement will need to be applied for by the developer. The City will review these variance requests and make a determination as to the approval or denial of the project as part of the review process. A project proposer could also seek to amend the City Code. This request would also be reviewed by the City. B. Geologic Hazards, Erosion Control, and Hazardous Material Bl. Prior to demolition an asbestos survey shall be completed by a project proposer. At the time of demolition, any necessary asbestos abatement will need to be completed by the project proposer in compliance with MPCA requirements. B2. The management, containment, and cleanup of any spills that may occur within the Study Area.dur•ing construction will be addressed by the permit holders of the MPCA NPDES /SDS Storm Water Construction Permit and its accompanying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation. B3. if a neighborhood convenience store and gas station is proposed, the project proposer will be required to adhere to State regulations for containment of underground petroleum tanks and an annual license would be needed. B4. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), including temporary and permanent seeding and staging plans, will be required to be submitted by each project proposer and reviewed by Edina, BS. The project proposer will need to develop an erosion control plan and submit this plan to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for review and approval. Finut Alter native Urban Areawide Review Update Page 7 Gateway Study Area City ojEdina, MN y WSR Project No. 1686-37 4 1 June 2013 J' t Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 6 Gateway Study Area City o %Edina, MN \ WSB Project No. 16116.37d1tAi1! June 2013 Hotel 257 Rooms - Future Norman Pointe Ill 312,000 ft2 Office Future Office Tower Marketpoint Ill 250,000 ft2 Office - Future OYJce T ower 6500 France 209 Unit Senior Housing / Skilled Care - In review process Avenue Redevelopment of 40,000 ft2 of a movie theater to 86,000 ft2 of retail Cypress Properties development. (Not Yet Completed) _ Approved increase of retail space from 154,000 ft2 to 196,500 ft2 by 2008. Target (Completed) Approved constriction of an 18 story building with 79 condominiums, a 225 Westin room hotel, and 7,000 ft2 restaurant (Completed) York Place Approved construction of 49,000 ft2 of retail space and 86 senior apartments. Development Replaces 52,750 ft2 of office space. (Development Completed as CVS) TO Miller Development (7380 Net increase of 2,000 gsf of office space (Completed) frame Office) Edina 69 France 3,000 ft2 Retail and 5,000 ft2 Office- Completed Av enue Avenue Centennial Lakes 2,000 ft2 Coffee Shop - Approved under construction Coffee Shop Fairview Southdale 30,000 W Emergency Room expansion - In review process Expansion Southdale 232 Units - Approved under construction Residential Whole Foods 32,000 ft2 Whole Food Grocery store - Completed YMCA 21,000 ft2 Expansion - Completed Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review Update Page 6 Gateway Study Area City o %Edina, MN \ WSB Project No. 16116.37d1tAi1! June 2013 Hovland said following the presentation on the. project that it has "ignited the imagination" of city staff and made the city realize what the area west of France Avenue could become. He pointed out the aerial photo shown during the presentation that shows the neighborhood and Fred Richards to the north of Pentagon Park, "and all of a sudden you hit a wall of gray and its all concrete all the way to 494." Contact Lisa Kaczke at lisa.kaczke @ecm- inc.com Filed Under: edina NEWS Pentagon Park developer considering In terms of building heights, the plan is to havefour -story buildings facing Fred Richards and five -story buildings facing West 77th Street. The proposed hotel could be; 12 stories. The council was split on whether it would allow the hotel to rise higher than 12 stories, the maximum height allowed in the city's Comprehensive Plan. A possible restaurant on the site would be something that has -a "hometown feel" to it and isn't a chain, Takenoff said. Brindle said she hopes that the, potential businesses and restaurants provide some nightlife for the area so that the entire site doesn't go dark at 5 p.m. Councilmember Joni Bennett pointed to the Excelsior and Grand development in St. Louis Park, saying it's been a success at revitalizing the area and is an amenity to the homes around it. She said she appreciates the opportunity for a similar private- public partnership on the Pentagon Park site. Hillcrest Development is working on two different concepts for the site based on the future of the Fred Richards Golf Course, which sits directly to the north of the office park. One concept provides synergy with Fred Richards if the city were to re- purpose it and one doesn't provide that connection, said Tom Whitlock of Damon Farber Associates, which is working on Pentagon Park's land design. If Fred Richards. becomes something,else, like a park, they envision connecting Pentagon Park via a bridge similar to the bridges at Centennial Lakes Park, he said. A parkway that circles the site and returns traffic to West 77th Street is also planned. No thorough streets are planned that connect the office park to the neighborhood to the north of Pentagon Park. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is also expected to travel along the edge of the site and they want to provide an amenity that brings people from the bike trail onto the Pentagon Park site and vice - versa, Whitlock said. Takenoff concluded by saying their "minds are open, options are open." They have two different preliminary ideas, and knowing the future of the Fred Richards Golf Course is "critical," he said. The conceptual design of the site envisions office buildings around ponds with parking out of sight, and areas where people could sit and relax like they can do currently at Centennial Lakes. The site's future design is being guided by six principles; green streets, integrated stormwater management, a pedestrian - friendly West 77th Street, connection between the eastern and western sides of the site, multi -modal connections and shared parking. They've committed to stormwater management that provides the city with an amenity and an area where recreation activities are at or above the city's standard, Takenoff said. They're also committed to encouraging bike and pedestrian traffic, including providing a facility to lock bikes and provide shower facilities in the buildings to get away from single - occupant vehicles, he said. "We need to do more than hang a bike rack outside the door," he said. They also need to upgrade the existing bus stops along the site to "signature" transit stations, he said. Councilmember Mary Brindle said she hopes they succeed at encouraging multi -modal traffic on the street. West 77th Street also needs to be upgraded and the street currently only has a sidewalk on one side, he said. The site's concept plan calls for a center median with trees, adding, left turn lanes and street lights, and widening the sidewalks to encourage walking to the bus stops. Parklawn Avenue also needs upgrades because they want people who bike to use it, Takenoff said. The buildings need to be built to LEED green standards and solar energy is being considered, especially for the buildings facing West 77th Street, he said. In addition, Takenoff said he's committed to returning to the Planning Commission and city council with a sketch plan that includes the architecture of each phase of the project. "We're going to be back here and we're going to be back here many, many times and in the community," he told the council. Takenoff previously held community meetings at Pentagon Park in the fall to gather input from the neighborhood north of the office park. He told the council that 2014 is expected to be a planning year on the project, and on -site action isn't expected to begin until 2015. Takenoff purchased Pentagon Park in two parts in September 2012 and January 2013. The office park was built from the late 1960s to early 1970s, and consists of 11 office buildings, many of which went into foreclosure in 2009. Takenoff touched on the site falling into disrepair during the council meeting and why they're coming forward for rezoning approval at this point. "There are a number of reasons why we are bringing the project forward at this time and one of them is that it has been a monumental effort over the 15,1;6 months to get the dysfunctional pieces of Pentagon Park together, to actually take these fractured pieces that have been put into a dysfunctional position over the last probably 25 years of dysfunctional ownership and poor choices, and we've got those pieces together and we now have all the pieces that are necessary to actually move this project forward and start looking at actual demolition of structures that are far past their useful life and candidly, just blighted beyond belief," he said. The proposal for the site includes office and retail spaces, along with a hotel on the western edge of the site overlooking Highway 100. The city has asked that the potential for housing on the site be retained in the rezoning. Although housing isn't proposed for the site, Takenoff has agreed to keep it on the table for possible future inclusion on the site, Planning Director Cary Teague said. A sketch plan of the site received favorable comments from the Edina City Council on Jan. 7. A formal vote isn't taken on sketch plans presented to the city council. The Edina Planning Commission also reviewed the sketch plan in December. However, the sketch plan didn't include any building or architectural plans for the site and only included a conceptual plan for the office park, located at 4815 W. 77th St. Planning commissioners and city council members commented that more specific details are needed on the plans going forward. Takenoff responded that the project is a "unique redevelopment opportunity" and they don't know what the architectural details of the project are yet, but they will be brought to the Planning Commission and city council for approval prior to construction. The site is expected to be rezoned from MDD -6, or Mixed Development District, to PUD, or Planned Unit Development. Takenoff said the PUD would give him more flexibility with the project, and council members agreed that PUD is more appropriate for the site. a _{ V« It Ah --- #:�,, 7�, .. The project is expected to return to the Planning Commission in February for preliminary approval of rezoning, which would put it on a council agenda in March. It would then go through the final rezoning approval process through the Planning Commission and city council. t'C11 Ld�Ull t'cli -li 1:U111:C1J L i'Cl:C1 V C� a favorable review Exhibit E By Lisa Kaczke January 17, 2014 at 7:00 am 2 1 -- � o 11_J Tweet $ +1 Sixteen months of planning to change Pentagon Park into a Centennial Lakes -type of office park are beginning to take shape with an initial favorable review by the Edina City Council. Scott Takenoff of Hillcrest Development has created two working ideas for the site — one if neighboring Fred Richards Golf Course remains a golf course and a second if the city decides to re- purpose the course. Takenoff's plans call for a multi -phase rehabilitation of the 43 -acre office park over a 15 -year period. "It took 25 -plus years to make a wreck out of it and it's going to take a number of years to make it successful," Takenoff told the Edina City Council on Tuesday, Jan. 7. Mayor Jim Hovland noted that Takenoff has helped the city see a vision for the property. "It was state of the art at the time and it can be state of the art again," Hovland said. • • • Matthew Dornquast Cem 6dem Bill George Jon Bloom Hillcrest's two concepts have one major difference. One is status quo for the golf course site and the other envisions the city closing the course and creating a public park, with ball fields, paths, streams and ponds that are better integrated through the entire 84 -acre site. It's seeking tax increment financing assistance from the city for either plan to help improve soil conditions and help pay for infrastructure such as street improvements; the golf course plan would require less TIF. Tankenoff prefers the integrated approach, but said he could live with either. He would like some direction on the two plans this spring and needs a decision on the course by the end of 2014. "There comes a point where we can't wait," Tankenoff said. "Are we integrating our land or not." Sam Black covers real estate, manufacturing and economic development Industries: Commercial Real Estate Trending In Partnership with Lee Odden the 42 -acre Pentagon Park office park in Edina. Sam Black Senior reporter- Minneapolis % St. Paul Business Journal Email Twitter I Gooale+ Scott Tankenoff has two options..for the city of Edina: one that involves keeping the Fred Richards Golf Course, and one that doesn't. Tankenoff, president of Minneapolis -based Hillcrest Development, and business partner Mark Rauenhorst, one of the owners of Minnetonka -based The Opus Group, are redeveloping a 42 -acre office park known as Pentagon Park along West 77th Street in Edina. Tankenoff has met with Edina residents and city officials of the affluent suburb for the past year to talk about how Pentagon Park could be turned into an upscale office park similar to Centennial Lakes in Edina or Normandale Lake Office Park in Bloomington. One of the keys to that plan, however, is improving the connection of the site to the green space immediately north of the office park. That area is now the home of the city -owned Fred Richards Golf Course, a 9 -hole course that also sits on a 42 -acre site. Edina hired a consultant in May to study the performance and operations of all its golfing facilities, which lost money in 2012 and will again this year. Edina officials last month called 2013 the worst year ever for its public courses. (Municipal golf courses across the Twin Cities are having troubles.) Edina hasn't started any formal deliberations about the possible closure of, Fred Richards yet, but it is expected to address the question next year. Some of the patrons and neighbors of the course are sure to oppose closing it. There's already a website, savethefred.org. Enter Hillcrest, which will present two redevelopment scenarios for its Pentagon Park office project at a.Dec. 11 planning commission meeting. Both plans call for a "several hundred million dollar" business park with a 400 - room "meaningful, signature" hotel on the western portion of the site closest to Highway 100 and about 1.4 million square feet of office space. • Choose a City Exhibit D • Local Business Directory • Book of Lists • Upstart Business Journal Contact Us • Sign In • Like on Facebook • Follow on Twitter • Follow on LinkedIn • Follow on Google+ Minneapolis / St. Paul Business Journal Search • Horne • News • People.- • Events • Jobs • Resources • Store Imo' - - -_A • i Subscribe Nowumited Time Offer Sign Up for the Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal Afternoon Edition Newsletter See all newsletters _ Enter your email address Sign Up SUBSCRIBER CONTENT: Dec 6, 2013, 5:00am CST Real Estate Is there room for golf in Pentagon Park plan? Hillcrest ®evelopment and The Opus Group are redeveloping Minutes - Work Session /Edina City Council /April 16, 2013 Economic Development Manager Neuendorf sought direction for a Phase II process for the Grandview District Redevelopment, following up on the highly successful Phase I community -based process that resulted in the Grandview District Redevelopment Framework. Following discussion of the Council and Planning Commissioners, it was determined that in Phase II, the plan would be to send out an RFI (Request for information) allowing developers to submit proposals for redevelopment of the public works site that aligned with the principles espoused in the Framework. Further, a ten - member .Community. Advisory Team (CAT) would be 'appointed to review RFI's and, later, to review 'development plans. The CAT would consist of one district business owner, one district property owner, two neighborhood representatives, two community at -large representatives, one Edina Transportation Commission member, one Park Board member, and two Planning Commission members. In early 2014, full plans would be developed, followed by the CAT's review and recommendation to the Council. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:59 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 7, 2013. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Exhibit C MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 16,,2013 5:07 P. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Bennett, Brindle Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Planning Commissioners attending were: Ken Potts,- Michael Fischer and Kevin Staunton. Mr. Staunton entered the meeting at 5:30 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Wayne Houle, Director of Engineering; Ari Klugman, City Manager Intern; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Brian Olson, Public Works Director and Cary Teague, .Community Development Director. City Consultant Bruce Jacobson was also in attendance. Mayor Hovland said the meeting would focus on two topics: a sketch plan review of the Pentagon Park /Gateway District and the Grandview District next steps. PENTAGON PARK SKETCH PLAN Community Development Director Teague noted in 2008 the City Council had approved a rezoning of the 43 -acre Pentagon Park to a Mixed Development District 6 (MDD -6) and approval of an Overall Development Plan for the site. Mr. Teague explained part of that approval process included an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) environmental study which must be updated every five years. To date, none of the proposed new development has occurred and the AUAR was being updated by Hillcrest Development, current owner of the property. He introduced Scott Tankenoff, Hillcrest Development, who was looking for comments from the Council and Planning Commission on a potential "Density Transfer Concept ", potential revision_ to the Overall Development Plan and a potential roadway that would connect Edina Industrial Boulevard to 77th Street. Mr Tankenoff explained that Barr Engineering was interested in a particular site and the proposed changes were necessary to accommodate their preferred site. The Council expressed concerns over the proposed height increases, the density transfer and potential roadway along the Fred Richards Golf Course. The consensus among Council was to not allow the shift to happen in a manner that would jeopardize future meaningful residential redevelopment along the ring of land bordering Fred Richards, especially with an entire neighborhood of single family homes just north of the site. The Council did state it would support a denser office use along 77th St, where the infrastructure was already in place to support the use, and where an office park could serve as a "buffer" to the interior ring of residential use along,Fred Richards. GRANDVIEW NEXT STEPS m MMUM !f7' "MA �xl A fu 44, A-1 14 A j7- rTi 1. fee Z,Nli rTi 400 K 78th Street I Richfield, MN 612.8 ;6.8332 I •bb o ndla.comf It "s Our Alain Street..., MSS'DA i WWW AASSPQHS.ORGT Where t ` r� , ., ly® Meet. mush- Info Sessions. 2/18114 43118/14:630 p.m. ALSO ON SUN CURRXIT Letter: Light rail is too costly — All I can say is you must be living in the dark ages! Have you travelled during Rush hour ? ? ? ?We should have Domestic homicides hit highest levels in more than a decade — In 2003 1 was-- fraudulently -- accused of misdemeanor domestic assault. Cornerstone's representative attended all Riding trend, e- cigarette stores open in Richfield — E- cigarettes have NOT been approved as smoking cessation tools, and many health organizations are wary of them. Bloomington School District referendum passes — How many times are we the tax payers going to get scammed by the education system with these yearly tax Exhibit F �. SF i 2 ' a Tonight's Open House is an importantstep in the potential redevelopment of Pentagon Park. Your comments will inform the planning process and help us to unlock the full potential of this tremendous site! Tonight's Schedule: Station 1 Station 3 6:30pm - 7:00pm, Open House Monitor displaying interior and exterior images of Redevelopment Issues and Opportunities - Key 7:00prn - 7:30pm, Presentation the existing buildings within the Pentagon Park Project Goals. 7:30pm - 8:00pm, Open House property. Station 4 There are five key stations around the room to Station 2 Models of alternative redevelopment concepts. orient you to the site and the effort that has Existing Conditions & Context - Aerial images been accomplished to -date. of site and views of Pentagon Park from the Station 5 neighborhood to the North of the site. Comment Station. z.. „ ,... gif Unlocking the dull Potential DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES - . '. '.. '.. T'��. , " , - � " ., '-',,. 1, , - � I ' - .1 -� I ' ;"' - - !. Z , - - �' ,. � ,� , r � " , I . ., -, , � 11 ii., 1. 1'. ! i '� " ��' �ri I . � I �. �' . ," - :� : - . , .' '. ; - �p � ' I ' - ' I I �' , 1 � . - I ---�.; ��l; - ". 1. ..L .1. ... 1, , � - -'. - - ' , - I - - z - - ,,, � I, , . o' - .� -. � I�' .' -- ! .. ,.- - � " . - - , m � I , ' - � ' ! . . : , � � , .' , , - ' �'- I I � � - . , � . � I , ". � I . , :I ' , � , , , - - , "; , '��'.�' :;.,, .11. 1v '- ! , . ! - , � . , It � ';' ' I ' ; I � I � , , � . '�. I , , ' , , . . - . 1 6 --1 1 , il : . , . .. -- ' � I . - � - "" , ' . t 1. �' , , - , - , � ' - ! I - - - � , I . '� . , . . , � � - . . , - , ; , . " - - �� -- - - " I I , . .. - - i I . . , � , - - � - - � , -. . , ' ' � ,. �� . . I , .� ; , , - - , . � ". " :' � � . - ,. , . . . - , . . - ' � , " ,. , , w�' '� . � � . . ; ,- - � , , , , , �' : %.' � ' '. I . ." . � '; � I -'�. � � I. , I - I . � ' I � I � � � : , ". ; - � � '.". I . - ': - , - , ' ' , . , "a��' , ' I , . - . 0 , � -- ,-, - , � - , ; ", � ' ' �-. � , - . - � i'l '. , , � . " - � , , . . . ' .. . . . - : I 1-1. . - I . - . . � . . ( I - j ; " � '� , . � � , � �,, � . , �. % . � I ,. r , � J, i��'. , I . 11 I .. � - I .\ , - , , , . . , - . � , . .� . I I. p , . . .�:. I -' . . . . 'i 'I v �'-t ' : ' � , . � -- , - , , ' . , - " ' , ! ,�"" , , . ' - ' -. ;'.' "-, , I , . � . " - . , � . : ; �' . . , � .! , , . . , , - I " I - � - ( � � " . � . � . . .. � ," '! '. , � � 1 � , , ' ; , , - - A . . . ol ' I I-. 11 V - - , � i ", " ) -. . , . �' bi4 �� � , ; I ,� i, .' � 7 ; , 4 . , � . . . � � . . . . . ". : . . , " , -", - � , ; - , - �� ." - " , . - . 1�r . - ��: ""-"",.,.��,,�",",.i,.- , , , . . . , ��' , , t - . '�. . I , . � , , - . . , - . . . .. -- .. . . , , , . , . . . � �' I - � . � . .� I . . I . - ..' � . ! , ',' 1 'I� - , ... , � , , . . - � " ". , 1 1 , , , , . . I � . , ,�4 , ) �' � .' " ; : , � " ? - , �.- . - , . � ; . ,. --�": I . . , " I I - I � 5 . " , , . I , , , - w "I. . I , . . , . . " ) I i �' ,-, , , : -* . . I � - , - � ,'� - ,% '� - I I . I - . , , , '2' � : " , , � . , , . , -. , , '. . . , , , , r A I I � , "-,.,. . . '.1 I., -, - , : . i . .. , , . ,.-, . L'. � -, - ' .; I � �� ". I I I - .- - .' , , :. �l . ; . i . I I , . . . : � , : .' � '- �-, - ' : , -, .. ' 'ji � ,t. I � - - . , . , . , , I I , - - ' I - . � " �-� t- ' � �' '- -- 1 1 -,� .' --,,-,-.-. r �---- , - -"�;� .--� : .: .' ': . �l '- % �. ': - '.' - ..' , . . . . , �jl , , - � . . � I 4 - �-' � �� : :;' " - -, � , -,% -'C7, - .� ,' � �i � �" -" � k ;,,, � , I ' �': :' I � ' - ' '�... ' 4�'r � ' ' e . " 11, " - - �- i -'1% ' I : �V � 11 '.. .. A �. '�-i ". '.'� , , . --.- " ,- -,j%, .' I � f '��' . , ".1, - , � ' .:;. P"? .; ... ;' . . " . � . . �' ' H' " . - . -: I t �J- ; � - "'� I ", ,I' - '�; -'� ; -Y '! I , � � � -1., , '1�1 � -"nt' . - .01". �- ."..'' �' � , .T '. . "'... -, I . � , , � . 1. �-' - ,:. �� , " , . " f : '�. '." .I, :,- '. .� , .. , 4?4 -'�" .1 -1. ) . . i ' "I -" -'. :' � , - . . i -:'� '.'�. - " . . " :. �:-� ", ".I, � I' �, I .- �: . , , I . 1. .- ' . , � .� ., ' �. � . : . , ..' . ;."'�, . . "� . ,i- I, ."� I' ' '4� ' ' ' . . "k, - - �i; "ll, . - - - ' : , a -. -, � ,'.' � , "". ; ' I � I� " , " ­.. u ".. , - !�� . 1. I , " -� - � , �F' , ". , , zr� . .- I - ,.:, ' I . "! . . , i _ , - , .' - . . , . - 11 .; . q I( 1. .k ' ' � "I. ; � �"'� . . . I , � , � � , � . .' , , �; . .1 '."" .- � ' , . . . , I . -.j( I .."l.". 1. ,.� , � , . -" � 1, ,. I , 't , - '. , ) ' � ' 1 �-7 , , , - . ' . I � I . , , I I . . I , , I - ' -; - :1� � 11%111.�. I I � . I �! . �' � � "� , , 7 ij';�- ,: .1 , li 1� . `� I . I " � . � . I... .. . ,tl'�, f z t � t ­� . "'�':; "'. , � - . , . I . jl i';'�' . ..- - .- �.. I I'll ., �'; :' .J..­' " �, "-�' .. . ..... �' . 'T;f- - � ... 1: -1 3 -"'�' - I 1. - . , . I ..." I I .�'..' t I , �..-.V' .' . i 1, - - 1.� " "'--� . t '-'� - I, , , '� . '. � �' . 1. � , � � . . 'I " - . . � . 1. .� - ,\. , . '- . -. II � , � " : I , 'I ' ' ' ' ' - , I , , � , , .. , I ll� "'-, . ` 11 ' I 'i : 1, .. - . " ��.J� , , � � , . � . - � , Ill . ,� '. . 11 t �- . ; � l.::. ,%. '� , . -� -� :; - "'." �: � �'�' �; , T� � . - , � , � , - .. i�: � ; - , ". , . . I I . - 11 . � � ; " . -, I v P! . I � ; I� - .-,. - ; � ; .!�-' : . : � " I �' '� .- � '.' . .. ' 6, I � 1 .� I', I � � 11 -'! � -:! ' ' lo.- � . 11. I. " I �i' . "' l,' ;;-", . . I : . , . � ", , ' I !�" "'�i , DALE -- ���",F '; ''. . . ". , ji;;"�r- . ..:. I ,;I ' ;'-..' �. . - ' ' ":.'� �' j � - - - 1 UTH I I j .1 �: 1, i� ; ' - -, , I . . . . -" , , �� :' "-,, - ! 7 : %, " ' . I ll� , - , , , . . 1. , � - - .3 �". I " : '� , �, 1 , � , I �- � . : . � - - - �- . � , . - , . ; � 'A : , j; ! . � " ' ;' \" . ; "I I " .. I .. -* i . . - . , � , �. I " I - , , . , , , . . : �L,� ; , �- , � � . ':". , � - , .1 1: - . : . - . : : � .� ". '; ? � -1 . I , "'. , , , � . � � : ; . I . i . I , , I , . . � , - ` - - � I . � '!" � 1, I '! , - . . : . , � , . ,. . � . . . . . , , , . , . . I - . : .1 " - , . . . ', '�' , � , ��. - -.' : , '; ; " . . ,. I � . . � I I I 'j . . I . ;- - " , . � - � � ',- i , ol ". I- k � , � .1 . . , . - " ': - . '), . . . '. - . , i! &�Z;a,-4':;���' ! 'I-" , �')" " �u � , , -,-, . , i � . � . . � .. . , , - - :�� � !.n., 'I - I � �-�"' .. I ' , - - . ; � � E .,,;.. .� 1. . 'I �-.�tll .�-. .-� , , ,-'-: , - , ,; ; ^ -i . I .- I , :� - - ' - � ` ' ,I,, - ' � , . . ,l -� ; ': ' ! : ': . � ��.� f t' - � . . � I , ': . , , � � i� � !. � . `- 14 1 � -" I r , ; '; . " .� 11, " ,,, 11 - -.1 .1 1, z. ; - - " tj , I l.r � .' I . I .11 , , � � : �'� .�' .& ' .. ; -'. - '��iL ' - ! , - . . . I .' .. , . : 's , � . , t - � . I I . , '�;- � '!,�: ..� �, � " . .' -� I ,,I - � q . - -.. I I I , �' - , - � ,� z, ; , , ' '�". '�!:.' .'�"-'4 - . � . .3, "I, - . �.!�)... -- THE,GALL - ' 1., ',-. " �'� . ..' O" C Ilg� -" - ''. - '.' . "t% . I � 1. . .. I ERIA�!�.' : - ' -- :�: , v.-, ;,� � . , , , 1, �.' �" I .. 1. .0 . '' '"' : " ' 3 � . - , r . . . .. �.. - I � I 1"'. , I j.-' - .. ' ,11-l" % I" - , �l . . - , , -- -1, �"��, �11 it �j�;.' -. - �Z�V.��,J.1'.. - , " :!-. . . ". ,I o , I - � - -.--;� t.-'.-2:'.-;Jotl, STREET, .-.�, ,l � I . :j.lji":'l- �. .."'-:L-�-'- k" , - - . " .i . -. I , ��' .. ".:�. . ' - i IAP-1. - . I. I .. " �� I . "., - . I , I- � .. i I .1 � , , - - 4-1; ".; I : jl-q -- - �n -'q , " .� 1. il -T �' � .'�: " 1" � - 11 I , .' . . , -, , r : - I ; - o - '. - . "lil , , , . �" . . "I �-'. . ,,I . . I , I .. ; - ul , :"� , L � I I � , , . I I - , . � , , - -': , , , , � ., I . , . �' I. ';' � : ,� - , ."'.V' ' ' - - J� ; . , - " - .. I I � - ,; I ,� � " I . . , I - ...'� " i ' .) '� a /� �' , , - ,,, %�'il �;`;t: I" �' � �y I ';",� 1. . �' '��.' , . , -. , t .. '� , .' k " I . I . , � �� i > ' .� ' '-'L,'�[' I 11 : . 1. � .. . �i I . , , , - - t . " ' - - � ' ' t. I I ��'��: � 1� � , 11 , . � 4 � � ; ' - �' � . - '. . ,,, , , - I , � � . .11 I I .. � 1. - � : . ."�. � � � , . �'-:! . - . ,; . ; � , . �-I. , I J" , ? ,� . . f � . t 11 ' �' v ,It - - ;: I! ' . I L I -�- I . >.", . i �' . � -'r , , : �' I , I ,it .1 ; '�� 1. - I 1. ' . . , .'. ! L , 4 0-1. . , , , . , - . . �i : � � ' q . '.� - , 11 , I �:--' '. ' ' . - - ' . ' ' ' , " a ,,,,.I: I 11 4 '. ,,, - 1. � . �.� . �­ .1 I . -'. . ' . , . 11 I , , , , " , � � . , � . , 1; I . ' - � I . V - , -, J � " � , 4 " , I I ! : � , �. �j � � - "I' " , I i , I � � I , � . -1 '.' 1 .. - , -. i , - " !.'-z I � : I ' " ' � � ' ' 1 - I - , - 11 - ` - �' "" , . ; I . � - - - � : " , -, -. , ' ' ' , � , .4, . I , . , . �jq..?'Jl"�' ,. I . .� t , , . ' . F-1 - - - - -, .: � I '.. � I " . , " ; . . - ' I ,j--, , I ' �j ?� , I , -, t � , I I.-- �"'- , . '. . , I - ` I- - . , ' , .1 - - I I , , , . I - , I . . - "� � , , ' �" '; � - I ,I . I � I " 1. . I -- , ", . '4y , . . .. - . e , . . , �. " - " , - . . I - I �� . I . ... ... :': .7 , .' ' 1. , ,� � -.. . I .� " "'. . .. ."', � W, i - I. � 11 �- " I , . ' � -'-'7:- . , , I I . � ;.-. .1 , , � :' I I ' 4 . I - , , �� � '. - I'�� " 4� - I 6 I I . - I -, . - - . . . -j , v ., .. 11 - I .1. 1 � . � ,. " , , . , . . . .. �' � I , '� , � . . : .... � . . I . I .. - .� t�l 'T '� ,) k - . ,I - , - I, " , . -. �" ." I , . I,.. , I i_a .: . . , - I . 1. . I. . . - . . .. . ... I � � 4,! I �'-�; it .!� , � s T - . ., " , I " ; - '� .. - .Z " U - '�'.lm ' ' ' wil , � . � .. , i I � i . '. '-.. , , -.� . � " : "', - . I � . . � .� . ;� , � .' � " , - - , .. , - - : 1. .1 - ," � '�': ' ' - 1 I . . . � . , � ," 1--1 .. , � ',;� : . :� .. L - " ,., , -..,: � ,.:. , .. "k VEW�' I 1. - , - I - ... � -1 I , , , . . . I 1. 1-J-'!..."�' - --:'-��' 1 k4 ,'.. ' "'-.�.-' L I I % . ".: . " -, , . . '. . . . , �' '.- . '- �. � , . . .' I � -'�i I - , I , , , . . Iry . . . . . .. �, I W . - - . ; � � :� , ' �4 .'- 'll� , , .1; , . 7 F . , , � � �. , p- -.�'�. ,' �'.';-; ". J�:: - . . . � ;, - .' � - - " . . .. " I! �' , " . 1:11 '�... , . , .�. I - �qjp;' �;t �".� � . :" ..' I i�- . . -.. , '�'A -' .- , - ". .�l , : �; -, - -"� . .-� .. , : , . i. - , . : % :�. 1 - ., :-11. �:j: , : - . ' . - , U � � "! �. . I .. I %-.. ; . . i f� ' "-" ' i, .� - I I �!�,'� �i. , " "', "i .1 ' ' , I . ' , 11 I. I, �, '. � .. , ., _.. . , , , . . .�.'.'. . I I:.- !;: ,. -lj 1, -;',, , , ".. .. , - . � -t i V­,' , , -'.�- . d. �' .I., � I I . I �. � .. I - , - .' I I r � , �.. . _,!, , - - , ,I - , 1 . 1 . - � , " I , , , .z ;'�-:'. . li '' . i . -,!. -"' ", �; � rV��' �� - � i- ..' � , , : 1, . , : . . , �. � : 1 ' ' 4� . �.'. .� � , . :. F , k ; �' � - , ". - L' . I , . ; . , - -1 �'_- �z' ,-,: k, - � - �' I, I, , - - . ,�: ,- '.. .' : 7 : - i I I .I .- : - .; . - I �� -i� - I . �' I . -.. ' - , � �� _f,­ '� � " 'I - . . . . o' � - ',- -- -- i , . . , 1 ..' It i I - � " irl , .1 I , .' r � . :. . . _.. ,, , , l_.. I , I , -" r � -; 1; ': . . , �4 ; - .1 -,;' '- I , � " ."; j '; � ' � : - _, ,,, , ,� . t,� � it - I . . . 1: '. .. 1. . - - � I- '' t 7 ; I .. t ', , 't � �:. I : . �. � � I , _: f' ._ 14 I `,'- 1-1 . - !11. '. . '---r.��z-��'��;' - ' ' " ' - .- - .,- . I � : ' I . .. . - : "i. �. �A ., ��j I .. ..... , � . I I , I 1 ` . " " '* :-� , , - , . .� % , . , . , i A. "I "I. .2..' -""�" I - � , � - ' . i - , . '. I -: : ..' I '� , -� . . . " . .'.1 � I I � 1; .. - . .� . � I , , �' " �. , �mI , 'i�"�� . - '.' ' .� , ;'4� - :. I , I , .." I " *' , - ,. . - ' ' 'o r, � ;. '. ;J'.-:� .".� - I I - . � I � -- �; ' � " I , . . ,, . I ,1' � . .- I - ", I �.�"' ", ". �': � ,t '-.-�;: j, " �.' , � � - : " �;�' ' - - -1 , �; , ; - - , � . ." �; �- -. : , , '." -. , , - . - � , - �--' 'p i ! �'P` ' ii? - , � , , 1, , , " , I , , , � , ':� ,�,Li,-: , . - - 2 � ��j -1 :.: �'-' . . " ." .- .':jF" - �"�Al;x � ' f- ;"� I, -'� , . m .� '. --ji "%I.. " :: i . �;:CENTENNIAL I IAK --,­.%��,. - ; �� I, . ,.. I . :11,17 . t -, � '.".1 e'� : . ',j" . I I . "; ��. � t--. ��. , - . L,,' �. � , � . ,"'.'t. .1; I , ' .1 . . -1 . . '4.1. " - I I .� 11 - I 4i'.'.�� , , c -"' ,. il� - . - , -- �k�. , A . . . . '...'r... . I .. .,�, ,�,,�'.4,3','­ . . . , . . . -.. %. "; �F-"ll , '� I -vf"�� .1 .-';'."l"'�"' , � , �' ".�: ,,:. -,-.-, , 1 . � " '. � . 1:� . ., .I . - .: ! : ' - , T,'':' �,�:-�f-;� ��!'.;.' .' "- �-!' ;:,- �" , ', I PENTAGON :, '; . ,.I �V .., . �I_ ,. ;.� .. ": . . -. .' - � � � - -, 4i - ".-- � .. 1: . . _ "I , -, N pj " I "t .4 : . , �.- , `� ` " , " �'i ', 'Ljjj"�� : , I - � . �'.'-' -.�: � .41,11 -'Y�t �, i, �i' .. f, ­:..' 1� '. - , I . I .- , ' .1. ''.. .11 . I . , - I -" . , -.� - - - , , ."e - :��- - - , 1'- . . . '- � - �-'-"� '- '�' ,' I - - � -'.'v . � o" I . , , .- , .-- ' , � - - _ . �'. � ". , - "'. 1. . 1:.. -,., -1 11 11 - . I ... . ,. . ' . �. - -, ." �A!' i .... ... ." � I : .", � , AI, r I ......... . A, . ,- '. "� i . . I . i F1'�'� .. I I 11, � I �" 1; � r . " 'I ... , . . , , - , j �' . - . .; . : " . '�' '.' � i %�' �- - ' - - c ..- . I -; ��."";� J� - �'- - % --, � , ��'o � '; " ""7 i-�� " I : � : : , � , , - " . I I . . - . . . t, �, L � ¢I', � , -, , I . - , , ) , �. I ­' . , W;" ' " � , '. , .-- �' . 1, � � : �.' � .1. , . I � ".: - I , . � ': " . - - . , . � It '<'-A � - � :,' .; '. .: ,:� ":. ,. , - i.! . �-' :L ' � '," . . - � - . a .. ,. . , I '�'�- I " � : 'I I ! I � V ' �: , - !��" A�"; ;Iw ' �; 1. - .1. :"I,, � i. T :� ji, - , ' 'i'l ., - , %, " . . 'A')�:' -'- -.-:-,: '-, ..' '�. �' I' ' . .. !��-.--i. '11� - � ; ,-. 1� IT, V , - . . :.-17 � 'S '� ']j � , L -.. Mr. - . -- -- - . ". , a -, , I i I - - , I 1, 'I'll'. 1; '�-' . i - It -: .'..i- . �! , --., f ; - . , I . � I I �X' p )�.' ' . I I 11 I " . '' - ' . p I ' i- (�' �. RF I I' , . - . - I I . [T�. .2 1, � .. .. m . I 1� - I .. .. .1, ­ , ;' .. 1 � lf�F I . .- i . ; ' � - i ... ".. , '...'L:1�'-. � 1 ". ,-, L ; I '.1 I . I ..'. I . I � �' - " ;I ": . ; .�"" ; , . , , , i". A;' '! K � " L, I I�.'%lli."' .. - , ! � �"--' '.-��" ?'!- , , , ; R! V. �' j� -� �' - -- !'T. -'l - : . � '. 1 " -'' ­ - ... ! - . - I t " - 19. �'.. ' ' � . , . .j. .; 4 , . . '�"X- ' �. I . I l;; . . . . ... � . U '. � , r, ��!;:-� I;. . ,.' , � . . 'I ' .q, , � li, - - , `15� , , ' " , ,� -; I �� 5 � � �':�' - .'. ' - '. ; .1 . �fl . '!�" . ... ' 4e - ,-�"";�-.­_`: '.'� ":"., - � . -, . .. ; ".. . ; , " . , ,' -' "r, - , W, ..", I '� "I :" - , ��' ; I I , ..� , 1; r4 ... , I Mlfl"'k I � 1. , ': , - '_'. . r �"-!� : -1. - !�'z�.- 1 ..'� " - -, "�' �;';'* ' ' , , - " � - - , " - . .7. , ��;' - ' - ' ' : i �' I I , '.� � - � -4% -:,',, . 'i!'-- 1" ' . . . .�, \�-., ��. ' ' � � . � . '4 ,. '�.� �;' -1,1 "W- - �. , " -11.1 . -:--'�.-. ;-'� -,,,e - ; Z,� �'� - , , - -, - -'o- - . � '..; :- , ,: , " - � .-P-'. 1.1,-l'-!- - � ,",:. .: �t . . ..... �';. ��.�":" ` - '-.". �"!� , 'n�.': - '-� . . I I . - 1't""�."tm�L-''�-�.;'I ".' .. � , ill".-.�� �'-- - 1 21 �'. ..- �)�' j ".. L . ,,, It - .1 - �. . . , , 100 M,� :i ': �� 11, 'r � , . , ;. I i�' '-io'.j'! ��- '�"' ')�'.-T! ; 1'�. " - � '. m I I .'� � I J� i 'I V i . . 'I d I I � ", 4 I- � , � ' I I 1� I � I I � . I � . . t , I 0' � 1� A . , 1� '. -:;".-.l!'- .�. - '.- .' '� , -- .. - -�. , � , --:', , , .. " I�i li.l. , 4"16'�`�- 1'1;� - � �' , I., :I- I "..--.. �.S�.� 'ni- !11-� <.- - 11 I , - . .v ', - , �.'�'. -.� - , . --. . - - , - I I, I; �'�.--;-',��-:'Ii Ii " "��;f,'.-:'-.' ;, 1. I . - . Fk:... �' � , -%�' , .1 1. - -11' -1 � ' - , � , ' - '� -, tt�'-'� ,4' �':' ti-1 I , '�� -- - , ;k--;, � ,m j.; -. �'.';Tf- ." ).-z-', " , - .. . I I - �'.-.- -� - - "' ": �' . ..' , . .. v - - - I I . . . f , V. . , -�"�'. . . . . - , I I .n. ! - 1 "",- ' 11 , ;t' 4'. , , -7- . , - -I". I " , ..�. - - - - r. , .- - V - ,, 1 I . , - 7 -�"' '� '� , :�'-":-�-'r�-'."l:."'I �'� .i' :i �t, , A '!"�'..;:' - - 4 �.. ".. :u . ' '.; , It, � "�- , . , - , cv, � ";; '� � ,. , -, . . �. ""': - ..'t '�' ;..-lj��:�--�',',T'-' .;, ..." t� 'L, ":'�_. A . 1, -, .. -. L " ' I ' 'I't'j, `:--'�"' - --� , --I '� 9 , 'i ),,`�': , - . � , - , , - , �� - . , ' ' I , i il. 1;1 -. , I � � . . Al I I ­ I . - 1� � , 5 I :, - .1 ­ . �l p ... , o - . . , I . F�L"--..' , I- 'i � 1, "'." . , - .- - � %, , '. ' 3. � � I , I., , '.' " , ' , . . . , . � - ' ' ."..' I.--l- I t �"�, -"�-"I�'�;'. . - - ,. � , . I .t. , , � � ... ..... � 1� .- ' i ', -1 :- . - ' - - . I .-w - ,- - , 1-1.1-1-1 . "'.-% " .;...,.,. rt�7",'�;I'il I �. I.. - � . ... � = - - � , �--'��,' "'.'. . �'.. , "� . - I � :=-Z:;�!�':'-'�,'��"�:..'�� �11�� - . - .'. I .1 ;. �-'-: - 61: ... .,;. -'�' , � � . I'llt,. -1 1� -1 � ...-" ':dz '_.- � ".1. - . � : � ", �7:. : . r- - �' 1-:1 y . ,..."�. '. - "-- - " -::-.� - � ;�� - " _':�z:"'�""�.;lk' '�. . 1, i'� ,���z�,'.���"41'.,.,."�.�."zt", - . i, . � �� : O" ' I I 1'. . . . 1 - ' . . .... . � ". , ' �' - I ' �","'�;"*�l."'-�e'.�r.'�-,.�j�,,,,Z,Z��' , I . . ,,---7.- , " - :,' , , I . . � I I.-,-,, J. .1 ,It ""-t:'--4'- - � 11�--I-�,,l- - ,i- L .. -- -". , I "'. I ,. I . ..", ., , - .. . -1. - -1 r . � . � , I � �'- ' ,r-�'j " I I 1--Z . 11 ' I -'�l '�""" �" ; -z! " �' %. , pt.. " .--'�' � . i .". �l 11 7- .. - . . - , - ,,-- - -, " .,' I I - I I, , , '.' p .: ' . '� -� 1. _ .'-' , , .. , - , ,. I . 11 . I r - . , , ; , . ... -- ' ,,.:. i "� - I l.'. � -" -�;: �-.' , 1, ;-. ,-. " -,-- -:- � . . .. "I.". I lt�. . .� " . . I ;-" '- "j; " � - '.. - - �'.'­:;;" � - , I . . .. .1 - --1.1 1. -.1 � �....' - I',' r 1, w � . - _� � � , . �' ', . . � . I . - � z I,"- , � , . , , - ' .' -U'��' " ",0 'I"- "i4 .'e r��: , , - . V;� --� z�!-" . - ��.Z -'­'­-,z� ,r­..:' - � � ; " --- ", �% - - . -1 I .. I I ' - . '...' ,� . ` �� � - i :j I - -:"-.--.-.�-1 -. " �' 11 V, -p 1 I . '�--"c :�� �. "��' .. �� � ' q t� . It .01', . ' ' '�-. -"'�' ;' . - � , ..-. . t-' ':-- , - -.',i - , , , k , , , '. .. . �;. . .� '� ' L " 1, _ _ r,.;, t . . �' - '.", - .: � -� ' . - I '. , M'�:'F - I 1 . . � . _.I 1, � "4 , \. , .-. '�. , . � . - - � , 'I "I ., I " ., . - " %, _ � _ ,f, , '. . I t�� I :��. ' . , - - :� " - . � , , .' 1� ' � � -;�'. �- ��..� � '� m -��'.��-�� - 1 I- 1. - - . ". , , , I . "IL' �". _ � ' '.\ t , k��'�'-� -z�j -,",:1. �.' ,.. i �,j- 7,' , I - -� 494�' i , � ';�' � '�T , �r,.', jj" �j' . . .� '.. . . , �.. :. ' ' I ' '-'�--: ', , i-fiv, �: -� r, '? , , , �' I ", ' I - ";; . -­-, � � -. %�.' - . I � '. ". � � " , P'l� ' ' "": ' --, :' I '� . - �' t:': � ;. 'Y ' ,i ,. , , -,!��- ��'�T�f7--.--��7 ':- - '; . - - �'.;" , " '. ' ; -, , ;. . . , . : -'-'. 6p, I I - � - . - .... ' ., � , " I, - I I . � �. " . 1 '� . r,.,,,\ , .11.�. � " � ". ,I i �'� !� I .. I 1: 11 �11 . - � ��llll "I , , � . - �i�" ::.,!" , . '- ... . , 1. . - � � �. , " ... ': I . " �R V --f , " � .. , , , , k - - I I, .." �'-� � I _ � - , -: . . �. - t - - -, . .1 � -� - - - , , .I: , - . � , , : r I - - , .' . .. I �� 1 1, - , :Omjjz�'.. . ,,, - � . , � ., , I _ . � , '�' 11 , I I I , it ✓I I 1, " - ...... I : . , , I 1, . . !. i, -� • �';# , In . . ... i- '- . '�ri. --'S�I�iIIN: '. . � � . �i - - .1 I . .,. i I., , - . � I . c I I � - , I. , . ... � %-I 'I-i' "--'q"'U. - �'-' I - - .1 I - V I - - ;�'. , - I ",L,-.. I J�l -L 1­1 '� - , QT. .1 I . - - �' 0 , '�� , .�. � 11, , . '. I .i . a a, p . - - ' � , �: - 1'."' ;� . - - -1 "-, ", :!- � -'�. , ,. . .; "P'. '.'� �. ", " -I � . -, 4, . -�' -, , "t" ---�!�"! f" - . ; .' � -1 �' � I . , .:". - 1 �� , ,! -, - .;'�'.� ;' - . . . I '. . ,- . w , OR , I � , � i i� �.�' I I: .� � . � �' I I I R:.�'- I . . . !.". - , : �;Z: : , 'Lt . ;. I � I � • ; . �. tq �' , , i�l I �. ' .' , � ; .' . 1 '�. - �'�'.�' ��."' ;� I - :; .":. .'�' �' -- '? - - 'I 4 I . I I -1 ';� tir - I � I",��.'.�'.' . "r : �'. .. - � . . . ,I; �� � : - - .sl3' " �" "". , ,� , . �. ' "t - :.� t I.. '. ; ""-'dP?' -- . I , ... 2� I - -1 , -�! 1 N I� a ,� � - :'-, , . , - - . , -4 , J. .1 1. . '4' � . .- - . - . " I ". '�: . I y. w ' _'t;' n«� a .'., ti -^ �* ,. �' I' ' t i'" w w *'« N e: '•, ,':, g ,; �y.v".PO, -1.: �*7"''LVa•°'�v., t u .,"�.,,,v ��, �� � 3 aFF3a^ >>h� � � r � � t :.s ��, —�.,. ' 11? • � ,.Rr � °"` r�3f''„> r'; /s".���- �g 5 .a.' E''�'.:,t.�, "'.��.�. � r c� ��,� �y u. � '��a�*� w'r ..�,r„ . . �. 'l> � ti ✓ dry � ,� � gir �� d` ��s� f .vr:. x'�`a� '�`� F,s � 'k� -J+,t { A H , tiK,l•' a 7R�� �".�5����k �a 5� x,;,,c^v,.�.: +� `{ ,� <•ir Y •'�vs»�' .d : w„ •\ :.;$ r .. � _ � "�y :` "� y1, f.r �ky fi Td�,k^`�� F n uyH ,rE t x i - 1 _ r / ;. �"i I.•:� .� ~' .r,. Vii', �.... - ,. ,1 -.. ,h 1.f "'� .. ,;-,� ,rid, .w.^ai -- ,• �.y�' -v' �;•. .t� �• f•,,.. v a .. yiT7r 7': iftri ' ,.' '� sRi r ¢!' �j ';i�,. 1+ r `` « a•... e _ r -¢ sa q `7. , a _•,. ,r -y 1 4r 7.���. _ � . j 9 - � `I`•ro V 1. I sr•� ^rS'8'! � m = "- _ ' ' v � ' 3:% ��. + �} z Y r4 1 '' i>� ���` i � ' .'�Av j �. ��t- d.SC� � '.I ,1.- '. c i .i' r �' i. .- ±"i' �cY� :a "1 ' 1° ,� , �; wMe r� k L .. � .,� .. q .. 9 ' �' r�.• \M � ���SH I YY, ay ��- � rb�.' °��• +�'a, t'* _ s�rr� � +: ra �w.; r`• u'" }i,..�: { -� � -�. c. �5�- �,�,rt,,,,�4 r4i!`kr�tirnT�` }r ,..ri et :t�.'t�11��,•�>`C .�,•.. � Q 11 Y} ,:t. �t r '^� ^.=; ��,r _ al • i � .•.} kl I.I. r�.i� �Y t] u _ r � .¢ta,� � -,r"'' ¢ :��, �_� :/ �'�= ! r �,!! 1 9,`± =�� i ;r'�,�+ .':�� 9 l �:1 ` 1 i'1 ._ ,•1..g =`r VI a� �` �t " 'rtu. �, .�'.; . f -� to � % • "- - � � -., (a• �y.r �' �� 42 �! 15*, r'- am r5 �. ,. ! f �' � � .; �• ,. i• �"�>'.c�`..a.. {.rza:.� n °.�'•.j A:� � ` 4 -r.. a ., -�. � �- 'L � .�:, t �, �,�1A _ ' ,y t, or' 'ih� � � x, I� q 3; I`9 �y .^r ;� .��.. 1�9 � � 1J ;� �t)� �,, * `•\•� M•: Nr�h t" :;� - - �" + �I aJ's �,'" ���+' _ i rl - r,t �v 7'1..`. '.r �'. .��- Off" RY�• r^°`_^- � y�! if .�,. s2'� 41 a' , i _� II'e'.. •.;.t Tap- WE J U J�,l_ * 1 I p t.�>< ��I it ,, C �} ♦ 1 '� I � �•,,v rte.. � r� r e u�F � C'M a wi : • "pig t �:: � ° I i 1. � S d ti. 1 44- p 5M3u +lE 4 F rl f A ^w �l P a. ba; -tf f w�1sL �3i� 1.,.� v.,'k :�n'`�, TMf ..f U�Y ; �j.+>rt�ev Y•;�th..,E -,y , <k �� �u 97; MNP _ t S t f � t 4 F rl f A ^w �l P a. ba; -tf f w�1sL �3i� 1.,.� v.,'k :�n'`�, TMf ..f U�Y ; �j.+>rt�ev Y•;�th..,E -,y , <k �� �u 97; MNP _ t S t f � 4 F rl f A ^w �l P a. ba; -tf f w�1sL �3i� 1.,.� v.,'k :�n'`�, TMf ..f U�Y ; �j.+>rt�ev Y•;�th..,E -,y , <k �� �u 97; MNP _ t S PF' f3l Ll 'La V'R fr ,al i G1 V'R fr ,al i G1 . . ..... .... is Bar 2 17 fto INTEGRATEDSTORMWATER 11 IMPROVE PARK ACCESS OPASSIVERECREATION ACTIVE RECREATION REGIONALTRAIL 4" a4 CONNECTTO GREEN SPACE — BUSTRANSIT 011511 SHARED PARKING PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 77TH 11111 It NEW TRAIL LINK DAMON FARBERASSOCIATES 4 61 n, 5 . . . . . . . . . . . Is 10 I t t r. BUS STOPS � 6- UOF M -HENNEPIN -XERXES - FRANCE -SOUTHDALE 578 - EXPRESS - EDINA -SOUTHDALE -MPLS AT- 587- EXPRESS -EDINA -VALLEYVIEW RD- NIPLS -IMES1,11CHIFIE1.0- 'ITH-MOA f .0' 125 of I.. ISSUES yl- f �t EDINA, MN - SEPTEMBER 2013 l v A F\ VN. It{I 1 F — - \lam• -. a V1d�' C t '- I EXISTING EXISTING RELATIONSHIP GOAL oh UNLOCKING THE POTENTIAL DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES EDINA, MN -SEPTEMBER 2013 tA /~ ~r pp�,HH RYE 8 B > m REGIONALTRAIL PARKING ACCESS EXISTINGVEGETATION ;;, � PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 77TH ST I t� o• us 250' ROAD SORMWOO PROPOSEDVEGETATION ® PEDESTRIAN PATH PARKING STORMWATER SWALES PROPERTY BOUNDARY DOCKSIDE GREEN CONCEPT A continuous linear stormwater amenity connects the development parcels A two -way parkway with parking bays provides a loop around the development, connecting from W 77th St 'Natural vegetation' is planted adjacent to stormwater ponds and buildings A regional trail is located north of the site, with three connections from trail to W 77th St W 77th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, stormwater management, and improved sidewalks Multiple parking strategies - below - grade, on- street and architecturally integrated with buildings BIRDSEYE OF DOCKSIDEGREEN LOCATED INVICTORIA. BRITISH COLUMBIA DOCKSIDE GREEN STORMWATERS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LUSH VEGETATION AT DOCKSIDE GREEN STORMWATERAMENITY INTEGRATES BUILDINGS ANOCIRCULATION CONCEPT DIAGRAMS..r' DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES " EDINA, MN - SEPTEMBER 2013 W7?THsT V 12S• 250, AERIAL OF THE UPPER LANDING IN ST FAUL, IVIN THE UPPER LANDING CONCEPT I Two road loops off ofW 77th St -providing .. .... connectivity without through traffic Small stormwater ponds are located on the '40, interior of the development buildings Public parking is located between the trail and ft IT. V� development 1110. Flexibility in block size (market -driven) st 46 t A regional trail is located north of the site between the park and development ` Ek W 77th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, stormwater management, and improved BARR. ENGINEERING idewalks ME- G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Multiple parking strategles - below-grade, WFITFIST -stree on I and architecturally integrated with buildings REIGIONALTRAIL rj PARKING ACCESS PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 77TH ST EXISTINGVEGETATION ROAD gM STORMWATER PONDS PROPOSEDVEGETATWN PEDESTRIAN PATH --MEnr- PARKING STORMWATER SWALES PROPERTY BOUNDARY STORMWATER SWALE BETWEEN THE UPPER LANDING AND TRAILS ROADWAY ADJACENT TO THE UPPER LANDING LOOP STREETS ALTERNATE WITH STORMWATER FEATURES PATHWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS CONCEPT DIAGRAMS rc DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES EDINA, WIN - SEPTEMBER 2013 ' %i I f W771'NST AERIAL OF THE UPPER LANDING IN ST PAUL, MN UPPER LANDING HYBRID CONCEPT Two road loops off of W 77th St -providing connectivity without through traffic • Small stormwater ponds are located on the Asa interior of the development buildings Public parking is located between the trail and Q2. development Flexibility in block size (market -driven) A regional trail is located north of the site k. between the park and development W7 7th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, q 5tormwater management, and improved BARB. sidewalks ENGINEERING Multiple parking strategies - below grade, W 7hHsr on-street parking bays on loop roads and architecturally integrated with buildings RECAORALTRAIL PARKING ACCESS EXISTINGVEGETATION I PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 77TH ST ROAD STORMWATER PONDS PROPOSED VEGETATION PEDESTRIAN PATH PARKING STORMWATER SWALES PROPERTY BOUNDARY STORMWATER SWALE BETWEEN THE UPPER LANDING AND TRAILS ROADWAY ADJACEN f TO THE UPPER LANDING LOOP STREETS ALTERNATE WITH STORMWATER FEATURES PATHWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS CONCEPT DIAGRAMS Pl_. 12 DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES EDINA, MN -SEPTEMBER 2013 1 3.- k 1 1 .. 8 8 .0' `r 250' AERIAL OF THE CHAIN OF LAKES ' 'Olaii `i EDINA s CHAIN OF LAKES CONCEPT • Multiple shared amenities A parkway is located north of site, increasing connectivity Multiple water bodies are located north of the site, separating the neighborhood from the development Small stormwater ponds are located on the interior of the development and manage water in concert with larger ponds to the north Flexibility in block size (market- driven) A regional trail is located north of the site between the park and development W 77th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, stormwater management, and improved sidewalks Multiple parking strategies - below - grade, . - - - -- REGIONALTRAR PARKINGACCESS EXISTING VEGETATION �i51 PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 77TH ST on-street and architecturally integrated with r ROAD " STORMWATERPONDS PROPOSEDVEGETATION ® PEDESTRIAN PATH buildings 7- PARKING STORMWATERSWALES PROPERTYBDUNDARY WETLAND AREA ADJACENTTO LAKE CALHOUN TWO -WAY PARKWAY WITH PARKING BAYS ADJACENT OF LAKE CALHOUN STORMWATER SWALE ADJACENT TO PATH STORMWATER SWALE BETWEEN PATHS _�- CONCEPT DIAGRAMS.�,Y:: DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES =° EDINA, MN - SEPTEWER 2013 g CENTENNIAL LAKES CONCEPT AVE contralwaLei feattue is located north of the A E ite separating the neighborhood from the development Stormwater ponds are natural amenities within Ole YI ' the development A parkway provides public access and bay parking '£N to the park 13 A flexible grid of streets (market driven) with iparallel parking connects ?711)Sttothe BURGUNDY' parkway north of the site E. PLACE A regional trail is located north of the site, with ov� W 77THST two connections from trail to W 771:11 St MA ENGINEERING IN 77th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, 'turmwater ma nagement,and improved "m $7 W sidewalks Multlple parking strategies - below-grade, on•sti -eet and architecturally integrated with REMNALTRAR. PARKING ACCESS EXISTINGVEGETAtION PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY MH ST buildings RI; L, 1 • V 12S• 250' AERIAL OF LAKE NOKOMIS ROAD STORMWAlERPONDS pRopOSEDVEGETATION — PEDESTRIANPATH -91Mom— PARKING STORMWATERSWALES PROPERTY BOUNDARY ONE-WAY LOOP WITH PARKING BAYS NATURALVEGETATION CENTENNIAL LAKES STORMWATER LINKS TO DEVELOPMENT ;;—, -\ $' —1,91 h CONCEPT DIAGRAMS k" 'it F EDINA, MN - SEPTEMBER 2013 DAMON FAIRSERASSOCIATES MINNEHAHA CREEK CONCEPT A naturalized corridor with vegetation and a spine of water is located north of the site separating the neighborhood from the development 006 Small stormwater ponds are located an the interior of the development buildings A parkway with parking bays is located between the naturalized corridor and new development A flexible grid of streets (market driven) with parallel parking connects IN 77th St to the BURGUNDY P parkway north of the site A regional trail is located north of the site, with W7fTHST' BARR Low two connections from trail to IN 77th St ENGINEERING W 77th St to be pedestrian friendly with trees, stormwater management, and improved sidewalks Multiple parking strategies- below- grade, on street and architectu rally integrated with - - ----- REGIONALTRAIL f^I AMNG ACCESS js EXI STI GVEGETATION PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY 17TH ST buildings 0' 125' 250' ROAD 'TORMYAr" PONDS PROPOSEDVEGETATION — PEDESTRIAN PATH —Moor— PARKING STORMWATERSWALLES PROPERTY BOUNDARY MINNEHAHA CREEKTHROUGH EDINA COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT COLORPLASTUS HEADQUARTERS IN MINNEAPOLIS PEDESTRIAN PATH OVER MINNEHAHA CREEK PARKWAY ALONG MINNEHAHA CREEK PATH AD)ACENT TO PARKWAY CONCEPT DIAGRAMS % DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES EDINA, MN -SEPTEMBER 2013 STREET PARKING - DIAGONAL STREE r PARKING - DIAGONAL STREET PARKING- PARALLEL THREE PRONGED APPROACH TO PARKING: 1. Below-grade (I level) 2. "Embedded" deck (maintain great addresses at perimeter) 3. Street Parking Parallel Diagonal Parking Bays TUCK UNDER PARKING TUCK UNDER PARKING STREET PARKING - PARALLEL STREET PARKING -PARKING BAYS AT FRED RICHARDS STREET PARKING- PARALLEL PARKING STRATEGIES 171 (. � I ) I q SEPTEMBER EDINA, MN DAMON FARBEIRASSOCIATES R 2013 1 0 E y nIt, ,ice l : i , ° >',r v sti� rya '� Y 36 �a 3 � ♦ �. a � zs -�''�� Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail master plan Draft - September 17 2013 Section IV I Trail Description & Background Edina Segment- - Location .and Status The 7.38 -mile segment of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is generally unbuilt through Edina. The Edina segment may be implemented in two phases and as such, the Edina segment is broken into West (Figure 13) and East (Figure 14) segment efforts. West Segment From TH 169, the trail continues east along the southern bank of Nine Mile Creek through a wetland complex owned by Edina. The trail follows a small sliver of upland'through the wetland complex to the Lincoln Drive cul -de -sac. At Lincoln Drive, the trail extends south between the road and Nine Mlle Creek. The trail will be located partially on rlght -of -way. and partially on parkland associated with Nine Mile Creek. The trail crosses Been Road /Londonderry Road before extending east along the southern bank of Nine Mile Creek through a large wetland complex to Londonderry'Drive. The.trail will cross Nine Mile Creek within the wetland complex in an effort to utilize available upland and make its way to Londonderry Drive..At Londonderry Drive, the trail follows the south and east rlght of -way to Walnut Ridge Park. At Walnut Ridge Park, the�trail parallels the Nine Mile Creek and stays along the southern limits of the park's developed area continuing east to Vernon Avenue via a third wetland complex. The regional trail will replace the existing trail along the parks southern boundary. The trail crosses Vernon Avenue at an existing controlled crossing and then follows the eastern right of :way of Gleason Road to the existing trail access point of Bredesen Park. The trail utilizes the existing Bredesen Park trails to TH 62. The main trails through Bredesen Park separate walking (pedestrian) and biking activities. Since the regional trail will utilize these trails, the regional trail is planned to also separate uses. This will be further evaluated in conjunction with Edin&during the design phase. At TH 62, "the trail continues to follow the Nine Mile Creek across TH 62 to Creek Valley Elementary School via a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge located between Gleason Road and Tracy Avenue. At Creek Valley Elementary School, the trail extends east, still paralleling the southern creek bank, across parkland and property owned by the Edina School District. The trail passes the Valley View Middle School and Edina High School and continues east to Tracy Avenue. East Segment The trail crosses Tracy Avenue at Valley View Road and. follows existing parkland along the Nine Mile Creek corridor to the intersection of 70th Street West and Metro Boulevard. There Is one segment near Brook Drive along the creek in which parkland does not exist. For this short segment, the trail is located east of the Nine Mile' Creek corridor on parkland associated with existing utility lines .and Immedlately west of the Canadian Pacific Railroad (CP Rail). This trail segment, as originally envisioned, passes through or is adjacent to, Heights and Abercrombie Parks, likely incorporates at least two creek crossings, and requires a new crossing of CP Rail. As part of the design phase, the crossing of CP Rail will be further studied and an alternative route would be determined in conjunction with Edina, if necessary. The exact location of the.trail along'Nine Mile Creek will be determined in the design phase and will take into consideration the challenges associated with amount of available parkland, wetlands, flood plains, Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 31 Section IV I Trail Description & Background Figure 14 Edina East Segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Source: Three Rivers Park District 32 Three Rivers Park District U :C a 14Z O Z NN d M W fl M C 'p W o N • i H C O or Le ag F U R° IV ° 9 .0 6 z 2 4ag and Nine Mlle Creek as well as the opportunities of providing public access to public land. At the intersection of 70th Street West and Metro Boulevard, the trail will continue south along the west right -of -way of Metro Boulevard to a new grade - separated pedestrian /bicycle bridge over TH 100. The bridge will occur somewhere between 72nd and 74th Streets, and will connect to existing parkland located on the western shore of Lake Edina. From Lake Edina, the trail continues south and east to and along the southern border of Fred Richards Golf Course. A small portion of this trail segment is located within MnDOT right -of -way and Burgundy Condos property. Similar to other trail segments within Edina, the exact location along /across the Fred Richards Golf Course will be determined during the design phase and in conjunction with redevelopment efforts of the Pentagon Park area, located immediately south of Fred Richard's Golf Course. It Is possible that an alternative to avoid the golf course entrance will be established. From Fred Richards Golf Course, the trail continues east along the western and northern right-of-way The Edina East trail segment Incorporates existing parkland of Parklawn Avenue to Gallagher Drive. The trail in which the trail is planned along Valley View Road. is located within the eastern and southern right - of -way of Gallagher Drive and continues east over France Avenue. The regional trail segment along Gallagher Drive was designed and constructed in 2012 as part of a road reconstruction project. This segment was designed to meet regional trail standards to the greatest extent feasible within the road right -of -way; therefore, no immediate Improvements are proposed at this time. From France Avenue the trail utilizes an existing trail connection to Edina Promenade between the Macy's Home Furniture Store on the north and a retail complex and Centennial Lakes Park on the south. Section IV I Trail Description & Background An existing Edina West trail segment along Vernon Avenue. The trail continues east through the Edina Promenade and Yorktown Park trail system between Centennial Lakes and Adam Hill Park (Xerxes Avenue). This segment of trail is designed as a linear park with separate walking and biking trails. The existing trails will serve as part of the regional trail corridor but remain under the jurisdictional control of Edina. The existing trails do not meet regional trail standards and Incorporate roundabout features which help reduce speed through a potentially congested area. When and if this area is reconstructed, the Park District will work with Edina to design and upgrade this trail segment to meet regional trail standards without significantly changing the character and intent of the Edina Promenade and Yorktown Park. At Yorktown and Adam Hill Parks, the trail extends south along the western right-of-way of Xerxes Avenue for two blocks to 75th Street where It connects with the existing trail segment In Richfield. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 33 Section IV I Trail Description & Background Context and Destinations The Edina trail segment is located through and adjacent to a wide variety of land uses. The trail segment between TH 169 and TH 100 Is primarily located on parkland surrounded by low density residential uses with a few pockets of medium residential density and commercial /office /industrial land uses. East of TH 100 the trail is located adjacent to and through office, residential (low, medium, and high density), and mixed uses. To the greatest extent feasible, the trail is located within parkland adjacent to Nine Mile Creek. In addition, the trail corridor passes three schools (Creek Valley Elementary School, Valley View Middle School, and Edina High School), several parks (Walnut Ridge, Bredesen, Creek Valley, Heights, Abercrombie, Centennial Lakes, and Yorktown Parks, Edina Promenade, Fred Richards Golf Course), France Avenue Business District ( Southdale Hospital, Southdale Mall, and many other office /retail employment centers), and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail corridor through Edina will provide opportunities to interact with Nine Mile Creek. 34 Three Rivers Park District several churches. The parks located adjacent to the regional trail provide an impressive diversity of recreational offerings including, but not limited to; ice rinks, walking, biking, and cross country ski trails, soccer fields, baseball diamonds, play areas, bathrooms, nature areas, tennis courts, gardens, fishing, concessions, picnicking, golf, a band stand, and a skate park. Many of the adjacent parks offer public bathroom facilities, water, and parking and by the nature of their location, support the regional trail corridor. Natural Resources The Nine Mile Creek corridor through Edina is a hidden gem. Prior to development, Edina took steps to preserve public land along the creek corridor and associated wetlands and floodplain. With the development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, this land will be available for public use and enjoyment. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail corridor is a mix of both wooded and open areas, upland and lowland, and developed and undeveloped areas. The area Immediately adjacent to the regional trail and Nine Mile Creek are classified as forests, wetlands, open water, shrub lands, and herbaceous landcovers by the MLCCS (Appendix Q. The greater surrounding landscape and adjacent areas of the Edina segment are predominantly artificial surfaces and cultural vegetation. It provides a little bit of everything creating diverse and desirable opportunities for regional trail users. The location nextto the Nine Mile Creek and its associated wetlands and floodplains provide a wonderful opportunity to provide access to engage with nature while fully Immersed within a first-tier community. While the corridor is a pleasant contrast to the heavily urbanized and populated area of Edina, it has been impacted by adjacent development and urban land uses. The quality of the natural resources of the regional trail corridor is the direct result of urbanization. The Park District will maintain the 16 -20' wide corridor to account for both trail user safety and the adjacent natural resources. While the Park District will not be responsible to manage or otherwise improve the adjacent natural resources, the Park District recognizes that the health of the greater landscape plays an important role In the value of the corridor and enjoyment of trail users; therefore, the Park District will promote environmental stewardship through its own operation and maintenance practices. Species of Special Concern Most wildlife species found within the regional trail corridor have already been introduced to human activities (e.g., existing trails and sidewalks, adjacent land uses, etc.) and are not anticipated to be negatively affected by the regional trail. However, there are a few species within a one -mile radius of the Edina segment that are classified as Threatened or Special Concern Species within Minnesota and warrant special consideration. • Two Blanding's Turtles (Emydoidea blandingii) - Threatened Species • One Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrines) - Threatened Species • One Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) - Special Concern Species • One Forester's Tern (Sterna forsterl) - Special Concern Species The Peregrine Falcon, Common Moorhead, and Forester's Tern are not anticipated to be impacted by the project. The Blanding's turtle is also not anticipated to be impacted by the project as the Park District will construct the regional trail in accordance with Minnesota Department of Natural Resources best management practices and recommendations for this species. Section IV I Trail Description & Background The Park District will construct the regional trail in accordance with Minnesota Department of Natural Resources best management practices and recommendations for all Threatened or Special Concern Species present. Acquisition Needs The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail master planning process identified the need for several new trail easements. The potential new easements are located through: • Former United Health Complex (southeast comer of Lincoln Avenue and Londonderry Road) • Edina middle /high school • Creek Baptist Church (southwest comer of Tracy Avenue and TH 62) • Burgundy Condos • Fred Richards Golf Course area An existing easements along Macy's Furniture Store property may be amended to allow for regional trails uses and /or increase the easement width. It Is possible that additional regional trail easements may be identified during the design phase. If this occurs, the Park District and Edina will work together to obtain the required easement while minimizing any potential impacts to private property to the greatest extent possible. In addition, limited use permits are required from MnDOT for the crossings of TH 169, TH 62, and TH 100. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Master Plan, September 11, 2013 35 -W i IVPCA - x .. Pi� .... ... ..... --- -- ------ C 11K L, pca-gis02.pca.state.mn.uslivii-riri.--�,,`indp-:.I-it.i-i%I tier VVhats In My N6ighborhpod zr liatitudet 5 9 it tde.- 93.330795 Park Lwm Ealatevo LJJ� el Lake 11 Ave Lown Apwbvm r:v v? 4) NeatlaetaiOfEdtna Rom, A APark Edina Mama PtastiesqVii'CIAL t1migh. EdInh Park Wausau > Ca Agra Foo" - fEdina Sedum Lh Um Plastic "-y Edina no dly of Pubtic Wclks 'Faiul Now F*W trio ARIna NWdl" ClInic Eft Poppy Lt' :100 Adc Taieconmiusocatimefts.& Larson DOW 0 InIMI-Will Use Bldg speec Inc metrapoutury p1moGallary, h 14--h-lid, h1cW3WWWli tric Aq6th S I Woodrac Grojikus inc mcs pearam - Wafteniodis Paniago" Once Pa* F. Corp -Minneapolis A 795 Building (P mMaNA mAps 113c Mown Service Parts Pentagon OfIce Park 0 WM Cle. PA. Cill - Fm. Ave Perm's 13911ard SunDw1hedon Norm bobtring E�** Ofte WdAr.. T GroVes Metr* Demalizare Edna Studio One lne Pentagon Om.0 P;;id Nash Finch Comp any Onne►wo'servtce coder APerilagm 011ice PoiltWentagan fd1cepark PPO Misium Devalopnent Center 1%ramer Ch lIPpg buhatiles Ind Location i OM %.fF"P.Wq. Park LLC Pentagon Om"Parkperamm m" Pat Edina 66 Service eRd A A AP-tilg-(M-Park APtnUkg0nOfF1COPXk Centennial LZAM • Comnwdcd Residential Redw1opment Cum= Creation PrIn CinlNunial LAOS U Pentagon once ParOArnerican �lezrt Associallon Mn inc'Mah-1 PMlam Inc& EtrQaddm Media tic A Yv I f1h St h"amoto CafttWU96W2 UteCOM A Cbemm Inc Minnesota Conway Fire a Solaty int "mrl Car Renlift AGFA Corp - Radislon 8 filorWister Car Wash ktalroDentWCare - Edna Conuntrcialautiang A VT�'Bntlo;r' rigiong ltl—de Technology LLLC - Bloorritnaton Q ,,Veec*9t[nT#*Wdt6 Tedmalogy setect Inn Of Blominclon n Seagate Tech PafMng Lot 4nipravernents A CL p ten l4laticnal Mutual Insurance C!6ynvi. maoics Farmer Came Co Markeodaft Computer Ave Demolition and Development ADC Taiecurrimmicalloas A14U Wtrdws Marketpolnte Il Office pxkWvke4i4nlv Outlets A & 0 lk Mx"alrile OUtWA 2nd AddillorAftneDOla Center =11111traiewlaCmter- JUndultdos %chad'$ Btl** 3339 • West 7m Orde Site FrmtcaAvarw*Dump:: Um - OutlofA&B (seq* clrc&dt City - Bobbyll 88&#*%A"t*WGFld itqp Strad Office Park 42—� a Esq, DeLormeL HERE, ipc, Intermalk MpG4sRiE-n/NASA. EP*-8SWsF'l-"4!al--fr, Exhibit J TMDL: Nine Mile Creek Watershed Chloride TMDL, Hennepin, County, MN Date: November 29, 2010 DECISION DOCUMENT FOR THE NINE MILE. CREEK WATERSHED CHLORIDE TMDL, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 C.F.R. Part 130 describe the statutory and,regulatory requirements for approvable TMDLs. Additional information is generally necessary for EPA to determine if a submitted TMDL fulfills the legal requirements for approval under Section 303(d) and EPA regulations, and should be included in the submittal package. Use of the verb "must" below denotes information that is required to be submitted because it relates,to elements of the TMDL required by the CWA and by regulation. Use of the term "should" below denotes information that is generally necessary for EPA to determine if a submitted TMDL is approvable. These TMDL review guidelines are not themselves regulations. They are an attempt to summarize and provide guidance regarding currently effective statutory and regulatory requirements relating to TMDLs. Any differences between these guidelines and EPA's TMDL regulations should be resolved in favor of the regulations themselves. 1. Identification of Waterbody, Pollutant of Concern, Pollutant Sources, and Priority Ranking The TMDL submittal should identify the waterbody as it appears on the State's/Tribe's 303(d) list. The waterbody should be identified /georeferenced using the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD), and the TMDL should clearly identify the pollutant for which the TMDL is being established. In addition, the TMDL should identify the priority ranking of the waterbody and specify the link between the pollutant of concerti-and the water quality standard (see section 2 below). The TMDL submittal should include an identification of the point and nonpoint sources of the pollutant of concern, including location of the source(s) and the quantity of the loading, e.g., Ibs /per day. The TMDL should provide the identification numbers of the NPDES permits within the waterbody. Where it is possible to separate natural background from nonpoint sources, the TMDL should include a description of the natural background. This information is necessary for EPA's review of the load and wasteload allocations, which are required by regulation. The TMDL submittal should also contain a description of any important assumptions made in developing the TMDL, such as: (1) the spatial extent of the watershed in which the impaired waterbody is located; (2) the assumed distribution' of land use in the watershed (e.g., urban, forested, agriculture); (3) population characteristics, wildlife resources, and other relevant information affecting the characterization of the pollutant of concern and its allocation to sources; (4) present and future growth trends, if taken into consideration in preparing the TMDL (e.g., the TMDL could include the design capacity of a wastewater treatment facility); and (5) an explanation and analytical basis for.expressing the TMDL through surrogate measures, if applicable. Surrogate measures are parameters. such.as. percent :fines and turbidity for sediment impairments; chlorophyll,a and phosphorus loadings for excess algae; length of riparian buffer; or number of acres of best management practices. Comment: Location Description /Spatial Extent: The Nine Mile Creek Watershed (NMCW) (AVID 070200 1 2-518) is'located in southwestern Hennepin County, Minnesota (MN). The watershed is southwest of downtown Minneapolis, and directly west of the Minneapolis -Saint Paul (MSP) Airport. The NMCW is 44.5 square miles in area and lies within the Minnesota River basin. The NMCW is divided into three reaches, the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek, the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek, and the Main,Stem of Nine Mile Creek. The North Fork and South Fork converge north of Normandale Lake in the central portion of the watershed (Figure 1, page 2 of the final TMDL document). The Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek flows in a southeasterly direction from Normandale Lake toward the watershed outlet in Bloomington, MN. Land Use: The NMCW is an urbanized watershed with a mix of residential, commercial/office /industrial, parkland, open water (lakes), and wetland space. Figure I of the final TMDL document displays the land use delineations within the NMCW. Table 2 of the final TMDL document contains land use calculations, by percentage, of each land use within the MMCW. The NMCW lies in suburban .Minneapolis southwest of downtown Minneapolis and directly west from the MSP Airport. Due to its location in suburban Minneapolis; the NMCW has two interstate highways (I -494 & 1 -35), state and county highways, county roads, and suburban access roads all within its bounds. These roads do not comprise a significant portion of the actual land area, but are a source of chloride inputs to the NMCW. Problem Identification: Nine Mile Creek was originally listed on the 2004 Minnesota 303(d) list for chloride. The NMCW TMDL had a target start date of 2005 and is projected to be completed by 2010. Nine Mile Creek is currently on the draft 2010 303(d) list for impaired aquatic life use. Priority Ranking: The NMCW was given a priority ranking by Minnesota for TMDL development due to the . impairment impacts on public health and aquatic life, the public value of the impaired water resource, the likelihood of completing the TMDL in an expedient manner, the inclusion of strong base of existing data and the restorability of the water body; the technical capability and the willingness of local partners to assist with the TMDL, and the appropriate sequencing of TMDLs within a watershed or basin (Section 1.0, page 1 of the., final TMDL document). The NMCW is a located within the lower portion of the Minnesota River Basin and may contribute high chloride loads under critical conditions to the Minnesota River. Surface waters within the NMCW are also popular for recreational use, such as fishing, canoeing/kayaking, and swimming. The water quality degradation has lead to efforts to improve the water quality conditions of this watershed, and to TMDL development for chloride impairments. Pollutant of Concern: The pollutant of concern is chloride. Source Identification (point and nonpoint sources): Point Source Identification: Road salt usage by municipal operators and road salt applied by commercial and private applicators (e.g. private citizens and commercial contractors salting parking lots, sidewalks and other pedestrian/automobile usage areas) are the two main sources of chloride in the NMCW. Road salt from these sources is carried into the surface waters, draining the NMCW by impervious surfaces (ex. highways, roads, and other paved areas) via municipal storm drains during snowmelt or rainfall runoff events. The potential point sources to the NMCW are: - Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Metro District Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) (MS400170) - Hennepin County MS4 community (MS400138) - City of Bloomington MS4 community (MS400005) - City of Eden Prairie MS4 community (MS400015) - City of Edina MS4 community (MS400016) - City of Hopkins MS4 community (MS400024) - City of Minnetonka MS4 community (MS400035) - City of Richfield MS4 community (MS400045) - Commercial and:private applicators (combined into a Wasteload Allocation (WLA)) - Industrial stormwater (combined into a Categorical WLA - Permitted Construction activities (combined into a Categorical WLA, determined to be a minor source of chloride because the NMCW is nearly fully developed and construction work,typically occurs in the warmer months when salting is not necessary) - Stormwater from Normandale Community College (combined into a Categorical WLA) Nonpoini Source Identification: The potential nonpoint sources to the NMCW are: - Background chloride or irreducible chloride load - Runoff from non - regulated salt storage facilities (all of the municipal storage areas are covered in the NMCW) Future Growth: Future Growth /Reserve Capacity information can be found in Section 3.3.4 (pages 22 -23 of the final TMDL document). Significant development is not expected in the NMCW and therefore existing conditions can be considered as the `ultimate" land use condition for setting the allocations of the NMCW TMDL. The allocations set for point (WLA) and nonpoint sources (Load Allocations, LA) are for all current and future sources. Any expansion of either point or nonpoint sources will need to comply with the respective WLA and LA in the NMCW TMDL. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the first criterion. 2. Description of the Applicable Water Quality Standards and Numeric Water Quality Ta rget The TMDL submittal must include a description of the applicable StaterFribal water quality standard, including the designated use(s) of the waterbody, the applicable numeric or narrative water quality criterion, and the antidegradation policy. (40 C.F.R. §130.7(c)(1)). EPA needs this information to review the loading capacity determination, and load and wasteload allocations, which are required by regulation. The TMDL submittal must identify a numeric water quality target(s) — a quantitative value used to measure whether or not the applicable water quality standard is attained. Generally, the pollutant of concern and the numeric water quality target are, respectively, the chemical causing the impairment and the numeric criteria for that chemical (e.g., chromium) contained in the water quality standard. The TMDL expresses the relationship between any necessary reduction of the pollutant of concern and the attainment of the numeric water quality target. Occasionally, the pollutant of concern is different from the pollutant that is the subject of the numeric water quality target (e.g., when the pollutant of concern is phosphorus and the numeric water quality target is expressed as Dissolved Oxygen (DO) criteria). In such cases, the TMDL submittal should explain the linkage between the pollutant of concern and the chosen numeric water quality target. Comment: Designated Uses: The designated use for the NMCW can be found in Section 2.1 (pages 4 -5 of the final TMDL document). The Nine Mile Creek waters are designated as Class 2B or 2C, 313, 3C, 4A, 413, 5, and 6 (according to Minnesota Rules Ch. 7050.0470). The quality of Class 2B waters, relative to aquatic life and recreation, "shall be as to permit the propagation and maintenance of a healthy community of cool or warm water sport or commercial fish and associated aquatic life, and their habitats. These waters shall be suitable for aquatic recreation of all kinds, including bathing, for which the waters may be usable. " Standards: The assessment of aquatic life impairments by chloride requires the use of the numeric water quality standard in Minnesota Rules 705.0.0222. The numeric chloride standard is represented as a "chronic standard" (230 mg/L) and a "maximum standard" (860 mg/L). The chronic standard is based on a four -day average while the maximum standard is based on an individual sample. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) determined that violations of the chronic standard occur when two or more exceedances of 230 mg /L are recorded in consecutive three year periods during the most recent ten year period. MPCA determined that violations of the maximum standard occur when there is one exceedance of 860 mg /L in a three year period of recorded data. Tablel : MPCA Chloride Water Quality Standard and Basis for Determining Impairment Standard Description . Standard Limit ( mg / L) Based on Violation Resulting in Impairment 2 or more exceedances in a 3 year sampling Chronic Standard 230 4 -day average period. Maximum Standard 860 Individual sample 1 exceedanceiin a3 year sampling period MPCA set the target for this TMDL to the chronic standard of 230mg /L based on the reductions needed to meet the standards. A 60% reduction is needed to meet the chronic standard and a 47% reduction is needed to meet the maximum standard. Further discussion of the loadings required to meet the chronic standard are discussed in the following sections of this document. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the second criterion. 3. Loading Capacity - Linking Water Quality and Pollutant Sources A TMDL must identify the loading capacity of a waterbody for the applicable pollutant. EPA regulations define loading capacity as the greatest amount of pollutant that a water can receive without violating water quality standards (40 C.F.R. § 130.2(o). The pollutant loadings may be expressed as either mass - per -time, toxicity or other appropriate measure (40 C.F.R. § 130.2(i)). If the TMDL is expressed in terms other than a daily load, e.g., an annual load, the submittal should explain why it is appropriate to express the TMDL in the unit of measurement chosen. The TMDL submittal should describe the method used to establish the cause - and- effect relationship between the numeric target and the identified pollutant sources. In many instances, this method will be a water quality model. The TMDL submittal should contain documentation supporting the TMDL analysis, including the basis for any assumptions; a discussion of strengths and weaknesses in the analytical process; and results from any water,quality modeling. EPA needs this information to review the loading capacity determination, and load and wasteload allocations, which are required by regulation. TMDLs must take into account critical conditions for steam flow, loading, and water quality parameters as part of the analysis of loading capacity (40 C.F.R. § 130.7(c)(1)). TMDLs should define applicable critical conditions and describe their approach to estimating both point and nonpoint source loadings under such critical conditions. In particular, the TMDL should discuss the approach used to compute and allocate nonpoint source loadings, e.g., meteorological conditions and land use distribution. Comment: The determination of the loading reductions necessary to meet the chloride standards in the NMCW were completed by utilizing'a mass - balance approach for the chloride sources in the watershed. The watershed loading capacity is based on the loads estimated by a long -term relationship between the chloride concentrations and a mass balance. There is along term relationship between field measured conductivity and chloride concentrations at all four Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program (WOMP) stations (see page 10 of final TMDL document). Using this information;.the existing chloride levels measured in Nine Mile Creek were compared against the Minnesota chloride standards to calculate loading reduction percentages necessary to meet the chloride standards. The reductions in the concentration were equivalent to the load reductions needed. The necessary loading reductions were then applied to the loading capacity for the NMCW TMDL. In 2003, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) began a more intensive water quality monitoring program within the NMCW. The NMCWD aimed to supplement the data already collected in the NMCW by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) at the WOMP stations. The combined data collection efforts of the NMCWD and the MCES resulted in continuous water quality measurements at several WOMP stations within the NMCW. For this TMDL, historical water quality monitoring data were used, as well as ' conductivity measurements (conductivity was used as a translator to chloride), from the 1061n Street WOMP station to better`understand the chloride loadings in the watershed. The 106`" Street WOMP station was chosen because: it is representative of the entire assessed- reach, -it integrates all of the upstream sources of chloride, it has the longest period of recorded water quality data, it maintains open water (i.e. does not ice over) through the winter months, and it exhibits the highest 4 -day average chloride concentrations. The NMCWD and MCES monitoring efforts showed that chloride levels typically peaked in the winter months (between January and March). Certain runoff events, during the winter months, exceeded the chloride standards during "critical conditions" (Section 3. 1.1 on page 9 of the final TMDL document). The critical conditions corresponded with large sriowmelt or precipitation events within the NMCW. Flow conditions in the surface waters of the NMCW during critical conditions can influence chloride concentrations as well. The surface water levels in Nine Mile Creek are also lowest during the winter months, resulting in decreased dilutive capacity throughout the water column. The MPCA completed regression analyses linking snowfall (days) in the NMCW and chloride concentrations (from conductance measurements). The chloride concentrations were based on the maximum 4 -day average and 15- minute values collected at the 100" Street WOMP station. The snowfall measurements were collected at the MSP airport, which is approximately three miles east of the NMCW. Snowfall was measured as any day where 0.01 - inches of snow or greater fell at the MSP airport. The average annual snowfall value from the MSP airport, based on climate records from 1950- 2008, was 31 days of snowfall. This resulted in a maximum 4 -day average chloride concentration value of 572 mg /L and a maximum 15- minute chloride concentration value of 1625 mg /L. Chloride reductions were calculated based on the chronic (230 mg/L) and maximum (860 mg/L) chloride values. The 4 -day average (chronic standard) reduction was set at (I - (230/572)) = 60% reduction in chloride. The 15- minute (maximum standard) was set at (1 - (860/1625)) = 47% reduction in chloride. The chloride loads for each MS4 community were estimated based on road miles within the MS4 community, the application rate of salt per road mile, and the mass fraction of chloride in road salt. Chloride loads (tons /year) were calculated for each MS4 community, for Hennepin County, and for the MNDOT (Table 2 below.). An example calculation explaining the calculation of chloride loads for each MS4 community was shown in Section 3.2 (page 19 of the final TMDL document). The chloride load for the -City of Bloomington was shown in Section 3.2 (page 19 of the final TMDL document) and is presented below. Table 2: Nine Mile Creek Watershed Existing Road Salt Chloride Source Loads (modified) Source Estimated Existing Chloride Load TMDL Designation (tons/ ear) Percenta e MNDOT 413 6% Individual WLA Hennepin County 761 12% Individual WLA Commercial /Private A "_ licators 2,339 37% Categorical WLA Bloomington 692 11% Categorical WLA Prairie 128 2% Categorical WLA —Eden: Edina 1,085 17% Categorical WLA Hopkins 421 7% Categorical WLA Minnetonka 278 4% Categorical WLA Richfield 42 1% Categorical WLA Back round U ' 198 3% LA "Total 6,357 100% City of Bloomington: Chloride Load (tons /year) = 5.94 tons per 2 -lane road mile per year (Road Salt Application Rate) x 384 miles (road miles in Bloomington) x 0.607 (chloride mass fraction of road salt) / 2 lane mile's per road mile (assumption of lane miles per road mile in Bloomington) = 692 tons of chloride perms used by the City of Bl(oomington. Chloride loading from commercial applicators was estimated based on literature values. The literature values estimated that 19% of the total salt used in the Twin City Metropolitan Area (TCMA) was contributed by commercial applicators and 5 % from private applicators. The commercial and private applicator values were combined 19% + 5% = 24 %. The TCMA value of 24% was adjusted based on the unique characteristics of the NMCW. The adjusted loading values for commercial applicators was 34.6% and the private applicators was 3.1% (34.6% + 3.1% = 37.7 %). These percentages were used in the formulation of the estimated existing WLA for commercial /private applicators (Table 2 above). The percentage attributed to commercial and private applicators in Table 2, (37 %) is approximately 1% less than the adjusted loading value (37.7 %) because in the calculations for Table 2, the commercial and private applicator percentage (37 %) includes the background load in its calculation. This issue was clarified by the MPCA in an email to the USEPA dated 11/7/2010 (Exhibit # 10 in the Administrative Record). Individual WLA were assigned to the MNDOT and Hennepin County. The remaining point sources were combined as a categorical WLA. The categorical WLA included the MS4 communities identified in Table 2 above. Average annual MS4 road salt application rates (tons /mile /year) were calculated based on total road miles (miles) within each MS4 community and road salt application rates (tons /year). The proposed salt application rate reductions were shared with municipal and private applicators (i.e. public works employees) and MNDOT supervisors. These groups shared.their technical expertise on the application rate adjustments and expressed their concern that reducing road salting activities could impact public safety. The MNDOT calculated that they could reduce their road salt application rate by 30% Without compromising public safety. The MNDOT application rate was reduced by 30% and set at 5.05 tons /mile /year. Hennepin County was also adjusted to the MNDOT application rate of 5.05 tons /mile /year. WLAs for each MS4 community were then calculated from the "adjusted" road salt application rates (tons/mile/year). The WLA for MNDOT and Hennepin County, based on their salt application rate, did not,: account for any salt usage from commercial or private applicators. A WLA was assigned to a lumped, or "categorical "; allocation for: the remaining MS4 communities in the NMCW,'the commercial and private applicators, the Normandale Community College, and.construction and industrial stormwater chloride inputs (See Tables 2 & 3 of this Decision Document). Table 3: Nine Mile Creek Chloride Budget and Wasteload and Load Allocations The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the third criterion. TMDL Daily TMDL .- Percent Existing Wasteload Wasteload Reduction Watershed Chloride Chloride Allocation Allocation of Existing Sources Loads Chloride (tons /year) (WLA) (WLA) Load (tons /year) (tons /day) (Percent) Hennepin County MS4 761 169 0.463 78 Categorical MS4s 4,985 1,885. 5.164 62 MNDOT MS4 413 291 0.797 30 Total WLA Sources 6,159 2,345 6.425 62 TMDL Daily TMDL Percent Existing Load Load Reduction Natural and Background Chloride Allocation Allocation of Existing Sources Loads Chloride (tons /year) (LA) (LA) Load (tons /year) (tons/day) (percent) Natural and Background 198 198 0.542 0 Sources Total LA Sources 198 198 0.542 0 Overall Source Total 6,357 2,543 6.967 60 The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the third criterion. 4. Load Allocations (LAs) EPA regulations require that a TMDL include LAs, which identify the portion of the loading capacity attributed to existing and future nonpoint sources and to natural background. Load allocations may range from reasonably accurate estimates to gross allotments (40 C.F.R. § 130.2(g)). Where possible, load allocations should be described separately for natural background and nonpoint sources. Comment: The LA section is found on page 21 of the final TMDL document. The LA for the NMCW TMDL was based on background chloride measurements from the Mississippi River and from literature values in a chloride identified in the final TMDL document. The empirical measurements from the Mississippi River demonstrated that background chloride was approximately 8.0% (18.4 mg /L) of the chronic chloride standard (230 mg /L). MPCA estimated the background chloride in the TCMA at 18.7 mg /L (8.1 %ofthe chronic chloride standard of 230 mg /L). The MPCA set the LA for the NMCW TMDL at 8.0% of the loading capacity. The LA was calculated after the WLA had been determined for the NMCW TMDL. The LA was determined to be 0.542 tons /day (see Table 3 of this Decision Document). The LA is not expected to be reduced because the LA is considered as an irreducible /background chloride load. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the fourth criterion. 5. Wasteload Allocations (WLAs) EPA regulations require that a TMDL include WLAs, which identify the portion of the loading capacity allocated to individual existing and future point source(s) (40 C.F.R. § I30.2(h), 40,C.F.R. §130.2(i)). In some cases, WLAs may cover more than one discharger, e.g., if the source is contained within a general permit. The individual WLAs may take the form of uniform percentage reductions or individual mass based limitations for dischargers where it can be shown that this solution meets WQSs and does not result in localized impairments. These individual WLAs may be adjusted during the NPDES permitting process. If the WLAs are adjusted, the individual effluent limits for each permit issued to a discharger on the impaired water must be consistent with the assumptions and requirements of the adjusted "WLAs in the TMDL. If the WLAs are not adjusted, effluent limits contained in the permit must be consistent with the individual WLAs specified in the TMDL. If a draft permit provides for a higher load for a discharger than the corresponding individual WLA in the TMDL, the State/Tribe must demonstrate that the total WLA in the TMDL will be achieved through reductions in the remaining individual WLAs and that localized impairments will not result. All permittees should be notified of any deviations from the initial individual WLAs contained in the TMDL. EPA does not require the establishment of new TMDL to reflect these revised allocations as long as the total WLA, as expressed in the TMDL, remains the same or decreases, and there is no reallocation between the total WLA and the total LA. Comment: The WLA section is found on pages 20 -21 of the final TMDL document. The WLAs were, calculated in order to reduce the chloride inputs into the NMC W from the two main chloride sources: road salts applied by municipal.operators (i.e. town or city public works departments) and salt applied by commercial and private applicators. The MPCA determined that's 62 percent' reduction in chloride load would meet, WLA.requirements to meet water quality standards in the NMCW (see Table 3 of this Decision Document). The WLA reductions were applied to the Hennepin County MS4 community (78 %o reduction in-chloride load), a Categorical MS4 (62% reduction in chloride load) and the MNDOT MS4 (30 %,reduction in chloride load). The NMCW TMDL recommends decreasing chloride usage by municipalities and commercial and private applicators. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the fifth criterion. . 6. Margin of Safety (MOS) The statute and regulations require that a TMDL include a margin of safety (MOS) to account for any lack,ofknowledge concerning the relationship between load and wasteload allocations and water quality (CWA §303(d)(1)(C), 40 C.F.R. §130.7(c)(1) ). EPA's 1991 TMDL Guidance explains that the MOS may be implicit, i.e., incorporated into the TMDL through conservative assumptions in the analysis, or explicit, i.e., expressed in the TMDL as loadings set aside for the MOS. If the MOS is implicit, the conservative assumptions in the analysis that account for the MOS must be described. If the MOS is explicit, the loading set aside for the MOS must be identified. Comment: The Margin of Safety (MOS) section (Section 3.3.3 on pages 21 -22 of the final TMDL document) outlines how the MOS was determined by MPCA. The Nine Mile Creek watershed TMDL utilizes an implicit MOS that utilized several conservative assumptions during the TMDL development process. The MOS was determined based on a conservatively high number (31 events) of deicing events which were used to calculate loading reductions for the LA and WLA. The 31 deicing events were significantly greater than the number of deicing events observed in any of the other years which were monitored. Water quality measurements, used in the development of the loading capacity, also employed conservative qualities. Water quality measurements were taken at the most downstream monitoring station. This station reduces the level of uncertainty because: it is located the furthest downstream and integrates all of the upstream sources of chloride, it has the longest period of recorded water quality data, it maintains open water throughout the winter, and has the highest chloride concentrations relative to the rest of the monitoring stations. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA contains an appropriate MOS satisfying the requirements of the sixth criterion. 10 7: Seasonal Variation The statute and regulations require that a TMDL be established with consideration of seasonal variations. The TMDL must describe the method chosen for including seasonal variations. (CWA §303(d)(1)(C), 40 C.F.R. § 1303(c)(1)). ''Comment Seasonal variation'was considered.in this TMDL as described in Section 3.5 "Critical Conditions and Seasonal Variation" (pages 24 -25 of the final TMDL document). Water quality monitoring suggested that chloride concentrations in the watershed vary significantly throughout the year. Chloride concentrations typically exceed the water quality standard between January and March (Section 3.1 on pages 8 -15 ofthe final TMDL docui-nent). Elevated chloride concentrations during these "critical condition's" exceed the MPCA's state water quality chronic .standard of 230 mg/L. The critical.conditions are those instances'where large snowmelt or precipitation events liberate chloride,:through,surface runoff processes, and wash the chloride into the surface waters of the Nine Mile Creek watershed. Seasonal variations of chloride concentrations were accounted for in the TMDL development process by calculations that estimated daily loading capacities of chloride under critical conditions. I he daily loading capacity calculations were based on the relationship between total load and peak streamflow concentrations (large snowmelt or precipitation events). Daily loading capacity values were averaged into 4- day'average chloride values over the entire year, and then used to calculate maximum stream concentrations relative to the MPCA water quality standards. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of the seventh °criterion. 8. Reasonable Assurances When a TMDL is developed for waters impaired by point sources only, the issuance of a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit(s) provides the reasonable assurance that the wasteload allocations contained in the TMDL will be achieved. This is because 40 C.F.R. 122.44(d)(1)(vii)(B) requires that effluent limits in permits be consistent with "the assumptions and requirements of any available wasteload allocation" in an approved TMDL. When a TMDL is developed for waters impaired by both point and nonpoint sources, and the WLA is based on an assumption that nonpoint source load reductions will occur, EPA's 1991 TMDL Guidance states that the TMDL should provide reasonable assurances that nonpoint source control measures will achieve expected load reductions in order for the TMDL to be approvable. This information is necessary for EPA to determine that the TMDL, including the load and wasteload allocations, has been established at a level necessary to implement water quality standards. EPA's August 1997 TMDL Guidance also directs Regions to work with States to achieve TMDL load allocations in waters impaired only by nonpoint sources. However, EPA cannot disapprove a TMDL for nonpoint source -only impaired waters, which do not have a demonstration of reasonable assurance that LAs will be achieved, because such a showing is not required-by current regulations. Comment: The Nine Mile Creek watershed TMDL outlines reasonable assurance activities in, Section 6;0,- (page 29 of the final TMDL document). The reasonable assurance practices will be implemented over the next several years. Methods for reducing chloride inputs to the Nine Mile Creek watershed include: Best Management Practice (BMPs) installation and chloride reduction educational programs have been effective in reducing pollutant inputs to surface waters in other watersheds. The MPCA is confdent.thatahese practices will be useful in,decreasing chloride loadings "in the Nine Mile Creek watershed. A technical advisory committee (composed of commercial, local government; state government technical experts) provided,input on the proposed implementation efforts. This committee will provide feedback through the duration of the !imp lementation efforts in the Nine Mile Creek watershed. Water quality monitoring will be completed by the NMCWD and VICES to track the progress of BMP efforts. Depending on the progress made toward reducing;,cliloride inputs into the watershed, implementation strategies or'13 MP. placement could be altered to best reduce chloride loads into Nine Mile Creek. The review of Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) for construction and industrial sites within the basin. Permittees who have SWPPP for their sites must demonstrate that stormwater generated from their site meets the WLAs targets set by the TMDL. If the SWPPP does not meet the WLA requirements of the TMDL, the SWPPP must be modified to meet these requirements. The U.S. EPA finds that this criterion has been adequately addressed. 9. Monitoring Plan to Track TMDL Effectiveness EPA's 1991 document, Guidance for Water Quality -Based Decisions: The TMDL Process (EPA 440/4 -91 -001), recommends a monitoring plan to track the effectiveness of TMDL, particularly when a TMDL involves both point and nonpoint sources, and the, WLA is based on an assumption that nonpoint source load reductions will occur. Such a TMDL' should provide assurances that nonpoint source controls will achieve expected load reductions and, such TMDL should include a monitoring plan that describes the additional data to be collected to determine if the load reductions provided for in the TMDL are occurring and leading to attainment of water quality standards. Comment: Section 4.0 (page 26 of the final TMDL document) outlines the planned water quality monitoring efforts by the NMCWD and the MCES in the Nine Mile Creek watershed. Water quality monitoring efforts will continue at the three Watershed Outlet Monitoring Program (WOMP) stations within the watershed. Post TMDL data will be used to assess chloride improvements in the Nine Mile Creek watershed and test the efficiency of BMP phosphorus removal strategies. 12 Habitat and fish surveys will monitor aquatic health in the stream environment during the installation and tracking of chloride mitigation efforts. These surveys will aid watershed managers in their understanding how BMP chloride removal efforts are impacting the ecological community in the watershed.. Additionally, the MPCA outlines other efforts in the watershed designed to collect specialized data through a series of small projects in the Nine Mile Creek watershed. These projects will generate data toward a better understanding of. water quality and quantity (flow) data, under storm and baseflow conditions, surface water chloride concentration and lake bottom chloride concentration measurements, chloride source identification information, and linkages between weather /road conditions to salt usage by each MS4 community. The U.S. EPA finds that this criterion has been adequately addressed. 10. Implementation EPA policy encourages Regions to work in partnership with States/Tribes to achieve nonpoint source load allocations established for 303(d)- listed waters impaired by nonpoint sources. Regions may assist States/Tribes in developing implementation plans that include reasonable assurances that nonpoint source LAs established in TMDLs for waters impaired solely or primarily by nonpoint sources will in fact be achieved. In addition, EPA policy recognizes that other relevant watershed management processes may be used in the TMDL process. EPA is not required to and does not approve TMDL implementation plans. Comment- Implementation strategies are outlined in Section 5.0 (pages 27 -28 of the final TMDL document). The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and various MS4 communities within the Nine Mile Creek watershed were identified as partner groups which would take responsibility in providing guidance /information to local citizens and organizations on BMP- installation. BMPs would include: cost - sharing programs to retrofit and upgrade salt application equipment, greater oversight of local SWPPPs to reduce chloride inputs, and improvements in public works maintenance practices. Other implementation efforts include strategies to: reduce salt applied to roadways in the basin, decrease the use of packaged salts and other chloride based deicers by cominercial/private entities, and encourage communication and coordination between municipal public works officials and private citizens with the goal of lowering salt usage. Information exchange, between commercial chloride applicators and MS4 staff, and public education efforts emphasizing chloride reduction strategies would also be included in the implementation plan from MPCA. The U.S. EPA finds that this criterion has been adequately addressed. The U.S. EPA reviews but does not approve implementation plans. 13 11. Public Participation EPA policy is that there should be full and meaningful public -participation in the TMDL development process. The TMDL regulations require that each State/Tribe must subject calculations to.establish TMDLs to public review consistent with its own continuing planning process (40 C.F.R. § 130.7(c)(1)(ii)). In guidance,. EPA has explained::that final TMDLs submitted to EPA for review and approval should describe the State's/Tribe's public participation process, including a summary of significant comments and the State's/Tribe's responses to those comments. When EPA establishes a TMDL, EPA regulations require EPA to publish a notice seeking public comment (40 C.F.R. §130.7(d)(2)). Provision of inadequate public participation may be a basis.for disapproving a TMDL. If EPA determines that a Stateffribe has not provided adequate public participation, EPA may defer its approval action until adequate public participation has been provided for, either by the . State/Tribe or by EPA. Comment: The public participation section of the TMDL submittal is found in Section 7.0 (page 30 of the final TMDL document). Various efforts were made to engage public interests during the development of the Nine Mile Creek TMDL. The MPCA organized a Nine Mile Creek "advisory group" which was composed of members from: commercial groups, local and state government officials, and technical experts. This advisory group periodically held meetings, throughout the development of the TMDL, within Hennepin County to discuss the status of the project. The advisory group also solicited input from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Managers group and the Nine Mile Creek Citizen Advisory Committee. The U.S. EPA,, the Nine Mile Creek advisory group, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Managers group, and the Nine Mile Creek Citizen Advisory Committee provided comments to the MPCA throughout the development of the TMDL and during the public comment period. The draft TMDL was posted online by the MPCA at http: / /www.pca.state.mn.us /water /tmd1. The 30 -day public comment,period was started on July 26, 2010 and ended on August 25, 2010. The MPCA received 2 public comliients and adequately addressed these comments. The MPCA submitted all of the public comments and responses in the final TMDL submittal packet received by the U.S. EPA on October 27, 2010. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted for the Nine Mile Creek watershed by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of this eleventh element. 12. Submittal Letter A submittal letter should be included with the TMDL submittal, and should specify whether the TMDL is being submitted for a technical review or final review and approval. Each final TMDL submitted to EPA should be accompanied by a submittal letter that explicitly states that the submittal is a final TMDL submitted under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act for EPA review and approval. This clearly establishes the State's /Tribe's intent to submit, and EPA's duty to review, the TMDL under the statute. The submittal letter, whether for technical 14 review or final review and approval, should contain such identifying information as the name and location of the waterbody, and the pollutant(s) of concern. Comment: The U.S. EPA received the final Nine Mile Creek Watershed chloride TMDL document, submittal letter and accompanying documentation from the MPCA on October 27, 201. 0. The transmittal letter explicitly stated that the final Nine Mile Creek Watershed TMDL for chloride was being submitted to U.S. EPA pursuant to Section 303(d) ofthe Clean Water Act for U.S. EPA review and approval. The letter clearly stated that this was a final TMDL submittal under Section 303(d) of C WA. The' letter also contained the name of the watershed as it appears on the Minnesota's 303(d) list, and the causes /pollutants of concern. This TMDL was submitted per the requirements under Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 130. The U.S. EPA finds that the TMDL document submitted for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District by the MPCA satisfies the requirements of this twelfth element. 13. Conclusion After and full and complete review, the U.S. EPA finds that the chloride TMDL for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed satisfies all of the elements of an approvable TMDL. This approval is for one TMDL, addressing one waterbody for aquatic life use impairments, for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed (AUID 07020012 -518). The U.S. EPA's approval of this TMDL extends to the water bodies which are identified as Nine Mile Creek Watershed (AUID 07020012-518), with the exception of any portions of the water bodies that are within Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. Section 1151. The U.S. EPA is taking no action to approve or disapprove TMDLs for those waters at this time. The U.S. EPA, or eligible Indian Tribes, as appropriate, will retain responsibilities under the CWA Section 303(d) for those waters. 15 "Ail. 'I MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday January 9, 2014 7:02 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:02 p.m. II. ROLL CALL. Answering Roll Call was Bale, Heer, Kostuch, Latham, Sokol, Thompson, Zarrin and Chair Sierks. Absent: Gubrud, Howard, Risser, Rudnicki Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Zarrin to approve the Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the Consent Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No Comment. Vl. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. City of Edina Purchasing Policy. Mr. Neal, City Manager, gave an update on the first Environmental Purchasing Policy Report. The policy was adopted in 2011 and is meant to serve as a guide to the selection of goods and services that have minimal impact on the environment. The challenges were balancing cost efficiencies and payback of technologies and improvements and the effectiveness of new and emerging technologies of how to determine if the green product is effective. Tim Barnes, Facility Manager, will help promote and communicate the policy better across the departments. Next year, the report will include what the City can't buy under the environmental policy. Mr. Neal.gave an update on the McKinstry improvement project of lighting, building envelope, solar panel and water conservation on city facilities. The project guaranteed savings of $50,077 each year and the actual savings was $52,136. The majority of savings was 64% in lighting. The City reduced its carbon emissions by 292 metric tons for electricity, 85 metric tons for natural gas, and saved enough water to fill half of an Olympic pool. B. Municipal Waste and Recycling. Member Latham gave an update on recycling. Single Sort had an increase in all commodities. The Park Recycling project continues to be a success and more bins will be added this year. Organic Recycling continues at City Hall and Edinborough.with no expansion in 2013, due to implementing of single sort recycling. There's no update on the Trash Collection reporting, because not all of the 2013 reports have been received. x j. C. Business Recycling Task Force. Member Zarrin gave an update on lessons learned with business recycling in the community. First, there is a financial and environmental case to be made to support .business recycling. Second, some businesses want to recycle, but don't have access to do it. Third, some businesses have access to recycling but the employees /customers lack training. Finally, single user facilities tend to make recycling available while fewer multiple tenant commercial properties offer recycling. Hennepin County has secured a grant to help businesses to start and /or improve recycling. D. Education and Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson reviewed the 2013 accomplishments. First, "What's up with the Weather" forum with Paul Douglas. Second, participated in the City's July 4th parade in conjunction with the Center for Energy and Environment. Third, Edina Day of Service had four Home Energy Squad visits: Edina Interfaith Environmental Coalition organized workshop on reducing salt use to protect waters. The 2014 goals are a "Chasing Ice" movie on.January 17th at City Hall and the "More Than Honey" movie will be held March 21St. The Earth Day celebration will be "What will Turn You on in2013" held April 29th at Southview Middle School with Michael Noble, Director of Fresh Energy. E. Energy i. B3. Mr. Bintner gave an update on the Building Energy Use Benchmark System which is an electricity and natural gas energy performance management for the City facilities. The Citywide Benchmark is 1.06BM. Individual facilities range from 0.2713M to 2.876M. Member Zarrin excused herself from the meeting at 7:49p.m. Mr. Bintner gave a detailed update on the Public Works, City Hall and Braemar Arena buildings. ii. Home Energy Squad. Mr. Bintner gave an update of the work done by Center for Energy and Environment. Home Energy Squad is a 2hr visit by two energy experts that reviews door. weather stripping; install compact florescent light bulbs, installation in the attic, and more. The Enhanced visit includes a blower door test and other diagnostic work for potential energy upgrades. The estimated average saving is $82 per household. iii. Renewable Energy. Member Heer said a goal for this year is to continue the City of Edina's Building Efficiency with additional energy improvements. Member Heer would like to review Xcel Energy's Community Solar program and learn how Edina can become involved with it. F. Student Initiatives L General. Member Bale gave an update on the installation of hand dryers in the high school bathrooms to remove paper towel waste. ii. Project Earth Solar Charging. Member Sokol gave an update on the Pilot Solar Power Project. Solar panels will run current to the media center to a charging station for student's phones, laptops, etc. G. Urban Forests Task Force. Member Latham gave an update on the Urban Forest Task Force. The report includes a Proposed policy for Emerald Ash Borer developed by the City Forester, Increase Tree Planting on public and private property, Update City of Edina Tree Ordinances 1200, 850.10, and 1055 with respect to trees, Living Streets tree planting and Review recommendations for Applicable Green Step Cities Best Practices. The Tree Preservation Ordinance for Redevelopment Projects was referred to the Planning Commission. H. Sustainability Task Force. Member Kostuch gave an update on the new task force. The goal is to put in place an environmental considerations form to attach to the capital budget projects process to make the city consider environmental impacts on new projects. 141 I. Local Food Working Group. Member Latham gave an update on the new local food working group. The goal is to implement the Green Steps Cities Local Foods Best Practice which includes Community Gardens, Chicken and Bee Keeping. In May 2013, a Community Garden of 50 plots was established in Yorktown Park. The proposed Chicken Keeping will be for Hens only and is for pest management and companion animals more so than for egg projection. The Bee Keeping needs a public education program on Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD) before implementing an ordinance. The plan is to provide an educational series as follows: in March view the "More Than Honey" movie, in April provide a program on landscaping for pollinators and in May provide a program on integrated pest management for residential yards and gardens. The LFTF ultimately hopes to have a demonstration hive in a city park. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS No Comment. , VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS No Comment. IX. STAFF COMMENTS No Comment. There being no further business. on the Commission Agenda, Chair Sierks declared the meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster 3IS Administrator MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 18, 2014 8:55 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Chair Hovland called the HRA meeting to order at 8:55 p.m. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Sprague approving the Meeting Agenda.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 3, 2014 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson, seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for February 3, 2014 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AUTHORIZATION TO FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AT 50' AND FRANCE PARKING RAMPS Economic Development Manager Neuendorf noted the City Council had held a hearing on proposed parking ramp and wayfinding improvements at the 501h and France Business District. He said that Kimley -Horn had prepared a Feasibility Study for Improvements No. P -23 to the public parking ramps at 50`h and France. The total proposed budget was $5,685,000. Repair and maintenance items were estimated to cost $3,310,000 while the estimate for capital improvements was $2,375,000. Continuing, Mr. Neuendorf explained the City has worked with private business owners to build, operate and maintain shared public parking to support nearly 500,000'square feet of commercial space at 50th and France. Original construction of the South, Middle and North Ramps was funded by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Tax increment financing was typically used for construction costs. Like the current proposal, operating and maintenance costs were historically funded by the business owners who benefit from the ramps. Mr. Neuendorf stated that $2,375,000 was being requested from the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund to fund the improvement. He said currently the Centennial Lakes TIF Fund has a balance of approximately $6.0 million not yet committed. That balance should increase to approximately $9.2 million after final incremental taxes have been collected in December 2014. Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Sprague authorizing the use of Centennial Lake TIF Funds to fund the proposed public parking ramp and wayfinding Improvements No. P -23 at the 50`h and France Business District. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion of Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner Swenson to recess the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting at 9:10 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Minutes /HRA /February 18, 2014 Motion carried. Motion of_ Commissioner Bennett, seconded by Commissioner: Swenson to reconvene the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Meeting at 10:17 p.m. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2014 -2 MODIFYING- SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, ESTABLISHING - PENTAGON PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN. Mr. Neuendorf stated the Pentagon Park office park, consisting of fifteen multi - tenant office buildings, was built in the late 1960s. For. several decades, it was well positioned in the market place and had much success. In the past decade howevr, its dated layout and aging infrastructure has made it considerable less desirable. During the January 8, 2613, City Council work session, the Pentagon Park area wa5'66e of several identified as potential locations where a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District may be warranted. Since 2004, the assessed valuation of the Pentagon Park properties has declined by 60 %. The vacancy rate of some of the buildings far exceeds that of the marketplace. Nearly every building requires significant repair after several years of deferred maintenance. The area is in need of redevelopment so that this downward trend is reversed. The City retained Ehlers & Associates as well as other professionals to inspect the existing buildings and prepare the TIF Plan and necessary modifications to the Redevelopment Project Area. LHB, Inc. inspected each building in recent months and determined that the proposed District satisfies the requirements for creation of a 26 -year TIF Redevelopment District. , Hillcrest Development, the new owner envisions a complete transformation of the private properties in the future. While no specific design has been decided upon at this time, the future land use will include a mixture of uses and will likely require significant improvements in the public infrastructure. The establishment of a new Tax Increment Financing District would allow the City to consider a public /private partnership in the future so that the full potential of this important business /mixed use district Following a brief discussion, Commissioner Swenson made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2014 -02 modifying Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, establishing Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District and Tax Increment Financing Plan. Commissioner Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director o e H'Xv �,o ,eae To: Members of the Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority Agenda Item #: HRA V From: Chad A. Millner P.E., Director of Engineering Action X Discussion ❑ Date: March 4, 2014 Information ❑ Subject: Engineering Services — Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements Action Requested: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Engineering Services for Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements. Information / Background: This proposal is for construction materials testing services for the France Avenue Intersection Enhancements project that includes upgrading the intersections of 66th St, 70th St, and 76th St and France Ave along with providing sidewalk facilities along the easterly side of France Ave where they do not exist today. This project is partially funded with a federal grant therefore it is required to perform Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC /QA) testing in accordance with MnDOT's Schedule of Materials Control. This proposal will ensure the project meets all the material testing requirements. The construction contract for this project was approved by City Council and the HRA on Jan. 7, 2014. Staff recommends authorizing the City Manager to approve the attached proposal. Attachments: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services for France Avenue Improvements, Feb. 18, 2014 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50' St. • Edina, MN 55424 Braun Intertec Corporation I Phone: 952.995.2000 iiooi Hampshire Avenue S Fax: 952.995.2020 Minneapolis, MN 55438 Web: braunintertec.com February 18, 2014 Chad Millner, PE City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Proposal for Construction Materials Testing Services France Avenue Improvements France Avenue between 66th Street & 76th Street S.P. 120 - 020 -037 Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Millner: Proposal BL -14 -00694 We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for construction materials testing services for the France Avenue Improvement Project for the City of Edina. Our Understanding of Project This project will include improvements to the curb and gutter and sidewalks along France Avenue from 66th Street to 76th Street. Minor storm sewer and concrete pavement improvements will also be apart of this project. This project will also include bituminous patching and paving and constructing limestone retaining walls throughout the project. This proposal is based on our review of the documents described below. If the project changes from the information provided in these documents, we may have to submit a revised scope of services and cost. Plans and Specifications dated October 21, 2013. (Digital). Discussions with Andrew Plowman with WSB & Associates, Inc. and Jamie Cynor with the City of Edina. This project is a City of Edina project with Federal funding. Projects that are constructed with Federal funding are required to perform Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC /QA) testing in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation's (MnDOT's) Schedule of Materials Control. Personnel with MnDOT certifications must complete the monitoring and testing. Braun Intertec will perform the QA field testing on the project for the items listed in our scope and as shown on our construction materials testing cost estimate. The contractor will be responsible for performing all of the required QC testing and submitting all the documentation upon completion of the project. An audit of the project could be conducted upon completion by the funding agency. The audit may include reviewing tests and paperwork provided by your QC /QA representative. AA /EOE Providing engineering and environmental solutions since 1957 City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 2 The Braun Intertec Difference At Braun Intertec we strive to not only provide the essential services required to meet the minimum project requirements, but to add measureable value in assisting the client to deliver a high quality project in a timely manner. We recognize the need to provide more than solely field testing on projects in order to verify that the project requirements have been met and that the project will be audited successfully. To reach this end Braun Intertec has the largest pool of experienced certified technicians in Minnesota, knowledgeable project managers specialized in Federal, State, and State Aid projects, and a culture of customer service. This allows us to meet and exceed client expectations, verify complete and competent testing is performed, and provide a final report which includes the information necessary to successfully complete a project audit is produced. Braun Intertec has a dedicated team of expert certified staff with the experience and knowledge necessary to perform and verify compliance with the Schedule of Materials Control. Experienced Personnel At Braun Intertec we have a group of knowledgeable staff who understand how to perform the necessary tests and are MnDOT certified in each specialized field. Our extensive pool of certified employees and numerous office locations allows us to be responsive to project needs and flexible regarding project scheduling. Technicians in our metro offices have the following MnDOT certifications: ■ Aggregate Production ■ Grading & Base I ■ Grading & Base II ■ Concrete Field I ■ Concrete Field II ■ Concrete Plant I . ■ Concrete Plant II ■ Bituminous Plant I ■ Bituminous Plant II Knowledgeable Project Managers We have a number of experienced project managers who specialize in State -Aid and Federal Projects. Their knowledge of the material certification process, MnDOT's Schedule of Material Control, required documentation, and the audit process is a valuable resource toward meeting project requirements. Our project managers are responsible for communicating test results quickly, submitting required documentation which include the preliminary and final grading and base reports, weekly concrete reports, and coordinating Independent Assurance requirements. As a result of past work our project managers have a working relationship with MnDOT staff and are able to get timely responses to questions and resolve issues to keep the project on schedule. Their specialized expertise is vital to the successful completion of the project and verifying the requirements of the project are met. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 3 Accredited Laboratory Braun Intertec is one of the few independent testing companies that is accredited by AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) in the metro area. With our accredited laboratory only eight miles away from the project site we propose to perform the laboratory tests at our corporate office location in Bloomington. With Braun Intertec's Metro Material Laboratory often working twenty -four hours a day laboratory test results are delivered in a timely and accurate manner to keep up with the project schedule and demands. Customer Service On any project, communication and establishing expectations are key to achieving customer satisfaction. To that end, our testers and project managers communicate regularly with the inspectors and project engineers. In our experience it is important to communicate material certification and testing on an ongoing basis. It is vital that information be quickly communicated to verify that all of the required testing has been completed prior to'that portion of the work being completed to avoid materials exceptions at the end of the project. Braun Intertec also uses advanced technology, such as our cell phone and laptop based Metafield® program, to improve the material testing communication process. Using these tools we are able to record and report testing information quickly back to our office so that the information can be reviewed and sent to the client in a timely manner. This process allows us to provide the client with the most current information as to our compliance with the MnDOT's material certification program and project requirements. Final Materials Certification. Report As the project progresses, our experienced transportation project managers compile the project documentation into a final report designed to meet the requirements of an audit. Braun Intertec has been successfully audited numerous times on state and federally funded projects in the past and received positive feedback regarding our process. Our experience with these audits has led us to develop the format for our final report in order to provide a clear and simple document that provides the necessary information. In our experience, having our final report on file reduces the amount of time needed to satisfy the audit requirements, presents all the materials information in a single well organized document, and minimizes any audit related costs or potential loss of funding for the owren As documented in the yearly audit results failure to adequately complete or document testing and material certification can result in significant funds being withheld. Our report includes the following items: Copies of Certification Cards for Braun Intertec employees conductingtesting on this project. Completed MnDOT Materials Certification Exceptions Summaryfor items tested by Braun Intertec. Completed Preliminary and Final Grading and Base Report. Completed IA Report All Moisture and Gradation test reports. Concrete mix designs. • Weekly concrete reports. • Concrete compressive strength results. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 4 ■ Bituminous mix designs. ■ Bituminous verification test results. ■ Bituminous Contractor's summary sheets. ■ Completed Density Incentive /Disincentive worksheets. ■ Copies of concrete and bituminous plant certifications. Scope of Services Testing services will be performed on an on -call, as- needed basis as requested and scheduled by you or your onsite project personnel. Based on our understanding of the project, we propose the following services: Soils As specified in the project documents, we have assumed the compaction requirement for the soil portion of this project to follow MnDOT's "Quality Compaction" Specification. The soil testing for this project will consist of the following: ■ Perform moisture content tests at time of compaction on aggregate base materials. Perform gradation tests on aggregate base materials. Assemble the preliminary and final grading and base report along with assembling the random sampling locations report for the aggregate base according to MnDOT Specifications. Concrete The concrete testing for this project will consist of the following: ■ Perform slump, temperature and air content tests on the plastic concrete prior to placement. ■ Cast 4 -inch by 8 -inch cylinders for compressive strength testing. ■ Cast flexural strength beams for concrete pavement placements. ■ Laboratory compressive and flexural strength testing of cylinders and /or beams. Develop the Weekly Concrete Reports for the Project Engineer's review and their submittal to MnDOT's Concrete Office. Bituminous The bituminous testing and monitoring for this project will consist of the following: Collect one verification sample per mix per day of production. Perform quality assurance tests on these samples which include rice specific gravity, asphalt content, extracted aggregate gradation, gyratory density, coarse aggregate angularity, fine aggregate angularity, and thickness and density of pavement cores. ■ Randomly determine and mark pavement core locations. ■ Observe the contractor coring and core testing in accordance with MnDOT's specifications, which include watching quality control personnel weigh the cores at their laboratory. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 5 Reporting and Project Management Test results will be issued for the project as the various tasks are performed. If, at any time, there are failing tests or we observe construction processes which do not appear to be in accordance with the plans and specifications or MnDOT's Schedule of Materials Control, we will notify the engineer's representative and any others that we are directed to notify. MnDOT Independent Assurance (IA) On Federal funded projects, MnDOT requires their IA personnel observe the QC /QA representative performing soil, concrete, and bituminous tests. We will schedule the IA visits as required. Scheduling Assumptions Based on our understanding of the project and the available project information, we assume the work for this phase of the project will proceed according to the following schedules: Bituminous paving will be completed in two days for this project assuming the contractor paves 300 tons a day. Fifty -four sets of concrete tests are assumed to complete this project. Thirty sets for curb and gutter, sixteen-sets for sidewalks, driveways, and pedestrian ramps, and eight sets for concrete pavement. We assume MnDOT's Metro Inspections Group is performing the Concrete and Bituminous Batch Plant observations and testing for this project. If the pace of construction is different than described above, this proposal should be revised. Cost We will furnish the services described herein for an estimated fee of $24,623. our estimated costs are based on industry averages for construction production. Depending on the contractor's performance our costs may be reduced or slightly higher than estimated. For the limits of this proposal we have estimated the testing rate and contractor's production based off our experience and have provided what we feel is a fair and realistic budget estimate. A tabulation showing our estimated hourly and /or unit rates associated with our proposed scope of services is also attached. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss our proposed scope of services further, clarify the various scope components, and discuss how the scope may be adjusted to meet your projects requirements. City of Edina Proposal BL -14 -00694 February 18, 2014 Page 6 Additional Services and Overtime It is difficult to estimate all of the services, and the quantity of each service, that will be required for any project. Our services are also directly controlled by the schedule and performance of others. For these reasons, our actual hourly or unit quantities and associated fees may vary from those reported herein. If the number of hours or units ultimately required exceed those assumed for purposes of this proposal, they will be invoiced at the hourly or unit rates shown in the attached tabulation. If services are ultimately required that have not been identified or described herein, they will be invoiced in accordance with our current Schedule of Charges. Prior to exceeding our estimated fees, we will update you regarding the progress of our work. Fees associated with additional services will be summarized in a Change Order and submitted to you for review and authorization. This proposal was developed with the understanding that the scope of services defined herein will be required and requested during our normal work hours of 7:00 am to 4:00 pm, Monday through Friday. Services that we are asked to provide to meet the project requirements or a contractor's construction schedule outside our normal work hours will be invoiced using an overtime rate factor. The factor for services provided outside our normal work hours or on Saturday will be 1.25 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. The factor for services provided on Sunday or legal holidays will be 1.5 times the normal hourly rate for the service provided. General Remarks We appreciate the opportunity to present this proposal to you. It is provided in duplicate so the original can be retained for your records and the copy can be signed and returned to us. Please return the signed copy in its entirety. The proposed fee is based on the scope of services described and the assumptions that our services will be authorized within 30 days and that others will not delay us beyond our proposed schedule. City of Febivary 18, N14 Page 7 We include the Braun /nterteo General which prqvicle.. additional terms and. are @pp.rtAƒour To have questions answered or schedule a t1me to meet and discuss our approach to this project fuetheri please cal Andrew lqjqrIqs at952.995.�ZQ, '0hcehe|y, BRAWN|NTERTEC COAPORATION Andrew M.VabMus Associate` Principal- Transportation Project Mah6ger Joshua J. Van Abel, PE PdncJa|` Senior En'|meer Attachments: Table 1.Estimated Costs General Condition: C. Jamie Cynbp City ofEdina ' The proposal is accepted, and you aYeaudloMzedtoproceed. " ' ~ __ --'' —'-- ---- - N 0 a BRAU." f NTE RTEC COST ESTIMATE BL-14-00694 France Ave.. lmots. SP 120-.010-637 City of Edina Service Desc: Co'R#ructlon Materials Testing ChadVillner 7450 Metro 13 uIeVOrd Work Location: France Ave., 66 St. to 16 St. Edina; MN 55424-1394 Edina, MN Est.irnat9r: An4roW M VolerlUs. Client Reference tnq 13- 5,13A:404 60scriptlolli: eldantlty: Un'lis: Unit Price: Extension: Phase:Construction Materials Testing Stirt Date: 5/15/2014 End Date: 12131/2014 Task: 5611 Observations & Testing Sample pl6k-up 6.00 Hours 61.00 366,09 Page I of 2 4.60 Trips at 1.50 Hours per Trip Field Moisture Testing 3.00 Hours 69.00 207.100 1.00 Trip at 3.00 Hours per Trip Sieve analysis With 200 wash (ASTMQ 1.36 and C 3.00 Tests 101.00 303.00 11.7), per sqm0q Topsoil testing, MN/DOT 3877A (Without I - �.66 Tests 247..00 494.00 nutrle�Mi),. per sa mpie Asphalt Content (ASTM D 2172/6307), per sample 1.00 Test 127:00 127.00 charge, per trip Trip rip 4.00 Trios 20.00 80.00 Soil Observations & Testing Total: 1,577..00 Task: Concrete Observations & Testing Cqncr.ete td.s.41.99 121;50 Hours 0.60 8,383.50 Concrete Pavement 8.00 Trips at 2.25 Hours per Trip Sidd.w.dlks 16.00 Trips at 2.25 Hours per. Trip Curb 4 Gutter 30,66 T?ibs at 2.2 . 5 Hours . per TO Qoncretd Cylinder Rick up 27.00 Hours 61.00 1-647.00 Compressive strength of concrete cylinders $2.00 T6sts '21.00 672.00 (ASTM Q%), per specimen Concrete P-qvem".t 8.00 Sets Of 4.00 C)4inderslSet Flexural strength of beams (ASTM C 78 and 16.00 Each 98,00 1,568.00 ASTMC 293), per rpe.6imen Compressive strength of 4 x 8" concrete cylinders 138.00 Tests :21.00 2,668.00 (ASTM C 39), per unit S/dewle!ko MOO Sets Of 3.00 Cyllh.derslSet Curb A Gutter 30.00 Sets of 3.00 CylinderslSet Trip charge, per trip 81.00 Trips 20.00 1,620.00 Concrete Observations & Testing Total: 16,788.50 Task: Pavoirrient Observations & Testing Split Vetifcation. Sample with Contractor 4.00 Hour 8��60 340.00 ZOO Trips at 2.00 Hours per Trip Mark and Observe Contractor Ccring 4.00 Hour 86.00 *.oii 1.00 Trip at 4.00 Hours per Trip Rice spqqlfi q grayity (ASTM S P 2041), 4 , pe w sample 2.00 Tests 70.00 140.60 Asphalt Content (AS . TM D 2172/6307), per sample 2.00 Tests 127.00 264.00 Extracted aggregate gradation ('ASTM D 5444), 2.00 Tests 91.00 132.00 per sample' Page I of 2 Y A BRAU - ;N COST ESTIMATE INTERTECI K7114-40694 Description: Quantity: Units• Unit Nice: Extension.. Thl6kness and density of pavement core (ASTM D .. .... .. .. .. and .. density 4.00. T Tests 43.00 172.00 2726), per specimen . 1. 1 . 290,00 Project Project Assistpot i 0.60 H6ifrs Gyri6ry gfavity (AASHTO T312), per sample 2,90 TOW 15,$.00 316.00 Percent crushed (ASTM D5821 5821) . per sample 2.00 Tests 0 . OX 136.00 FlnpAggrqgate Angularity (ASTM Q1.204,: per 2.00 Tests 64.00 128,00 s m ample Trio dh6r.ge, per trip -3.00 Trips 20.00 60.00 Pavement ObservAlpop 4TOstiniq Total: 2,068.00 Task: Engineering & Project Management Prqjeo. Manager 22.00 Hours 118.00 2,596,00 S.Oritor.P� ( piql� Manager 2.00 Hours 145.66 290,00 Project Project Assistpot i 0.60 H6ifrs 67.00 703.50 Final Report 1.00 Repoit 600.0.0 600.00 Engineering & Project Management Total: 4489.150 Constroction Materials Testing Tofdl! 24,623.00 PirpJect. Total: 24,623.00 Page 2 of 2 General Conditions Construction Material Testing and Special Inspections Section 1: Our Agreement 1.1 Our agreement ( "Agreement') with you consists of these General Conditions and the accompanying written proposal or authorization. This Agreement Is our entire agreement. It supersedes prior agreements. It may be modified only in a writing signed by us, making specific reference to the provision modified. 12 The words "you," "we," "us," and "our" include officers, employees, and subcontractors. 1.3 In the event you use a purchase order or other form to authorize our services, any conflicting or additional terms are not part of our Agreement. Directing us to start work prior to execution of this Agreement constitutes your acceptance. If, however, mutually acceptable terms cannot be established, we have the right to withdraw our proposal without liability to you or others, and you will compensate us for services already rendered. Section 2: Our Responsibilities 21 We will provide the services specifically described In our Agreement with you. You agree that we are not responsible for services that are not fairly Included in our specific undertaking. Unless otherwise agreed In writing, our findings, opinions, and recommendations will be provided to you in writing. You agree not to rely on oral findings, opinions, or recommendations without our written approval. 2.2 In performing our professional services, we will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by reputable members of our profession practicing In the same locality. If you direct us to deviate from our recommended procedures, you agree to hold us harmless from claims, damages, and expenses arising out of your direction. 23 We will reference our field observations and sampling to available reference points, but we will not survey, set, or check the accuracy of those points unless we accept that duty In writing. Locations of field observations or sampling described In our report or shown on our sketches are based on Information provided by others or estimates made by our personnel. You agree that such dimensions, depths, or elevations are approximations unless specifically stated otherwise In the report. You accept the Inherent risk that samples or observations may not be representative of things not sampled or seen and, further, that site conditions may change over time. 2.4 Our duties do not include supervising your contractors or commenting on, overseeing, or providing the means and methods of their work, unless we accept such duties in writing. We will not be responsible for the failure of your contractors to perform In accordance with their undertakings, and the providing of our services will not relieve others of their responsibilities to you or to others. 2.5 We will provide a health and safety program for our employees, but we will not be responsible for contractor, job, or site health or safety unless we accept that duty in writing. 2.6 You will provide, at no cost to us, appropriate site safety measures as to work areas to be observed or Inspected by us. Our employees are authorized by you to refuse to work under conditions that may be unsafe. 2.7 Estimates of our fees or other project costs will be based on Information available to us and on our experience and knowledge. Such estimates are an exercise of our professional judgment and are not guaranteed or warranted. Actual costs may vary. You should allow a contingency in addition to estimated costs. Section 3: Your Responsibilities 3.1 You will provide us with prior geotechnical and other reports, specifications, plans, and Information to which you have access about the site. You agree to provide us with all plans, changes in plans, and new Information as to site conditions until we have completed our work. 3.2 You will provide access to the site. In the course of our work some site damage is normal even when due care Is exercised. We will use reasonable care to minimize damage to the site. We have not Included the cost of restoration of normal damage in the estimated charges. 3.3 If we notify you that radiographic or gamma ray equipment or other nuclear testing or measuring device will be used, you will be responsible for the cooperation of your employees and your contractors In observing all radiation safety standards. 3.4 You will notify us of any knowledge or suspicion of the presence of hazardous or dangerous materials at the work site. If we observe or suspect the presence of contaminants not anticipated in our Agreement, we may terminate our work without liability to you or to others, and we will be paid for the services we have provided. 3.5 The time our field personnel spend on the job site depends upon the scheduling of the work we are observing or testing. You agree that any changes In scheduling may result In additional costs and agree to pay for those services at the rates listed in our cost estimate. 3.6 You agree to Include us as an Indemnified party in your contracts, if any, for work by others on the project, protecting us to the same degree as you are protected. You agree to list us as an Additional Insured under your liability Insurance policies and to require subrogation be waived against us and that we will be added as an Additional Insured on all policies of Insurance, including any policies required of your contractors or subcontractors, covering any construction or development activities to be performed on the project site. Section 4: Reports and Records - 4.1 Unless you request otherwise, we will provide our report(s) in an electronic format. 4.2 Our reports, notes, calculations, and other documents and our computer software and data are Instruments of our service to you, and they remain our property but are subject to a license to you for your use In the related project for the purposes disclosed to us. You may not transfer our reports to others or use them for a purpose for which they were not prepared without our written approval. You agree to indemnify and hold us harmless from claims, damages, losses, and expenses, Including attorney fees, arising out of such a transfer or use. At your request, we will provide endorsements of our reports or letters of reliance, but only if the recipients agree to be bound by the terms of our Agreement with you and only if we are paid the administrative fee stated In our then current Schedule of Charges. 4.3 Because electronic documents maybe modified intentionally or Inadvertently, you agree that we will not be liable for damages resulting from change In an electronic document occurring after we transmit it to you. 4.4 If you do not pay for our services in full as agreed, we may retain work not yet delivered to you and you agree to return to us all of our work that is In your possession or under your control. 4.5 Electronic data, reports, photographs, samples and other materials provided by you or others may be discarded or returned to you, at our discretion, unless within 15 days of the report date you give us written direction to store or transfer the materials at your expense. GC -CMT Revised 9/1/2013 Page 1 of 2 Section 5: Compensation 5.1 You will pay for services as agreed upon or according to our then current Schedule of Charges if there Is no other written agreement as to price. An estimated cost Is not a firm figure. You agree to pay all sales taxes and other taxes based on your payment of our compensation. Our performance is subject to credit approval and payment of any specified retainer. 5.2 You will notify us of billing disputes within 15 days. You will pay undisputed portions of Invoices on receipt. You agree to pay Interest on unpaid balances beginning 30 days after Invoice dates at the rate of 1.5% per month, or at the maximum rate allowed by law. 5.3 If you direct us to Invoice another, we will do so, but you agree to be responsible for our compensation unless you provide us with that person's written acceptance of all terms of our Agreement and we agree to extend credit to that person and to release you. 5.4 Your obligation to pay for our services under this Agreement Is not contingent on your ability to obtain financing, governmental or regulatory agency approval, permits, final adjudication of lawsuit in which we are not Involved, your successful completion of a project, receipt of payment from another, or any other event. No retainage will be withheld. 5.5 If you do not pay us within 60 days of Invoice date, you agree to reimburse our expenses; including but not limited to attorney fees, staff time, and other costs of collection. 5.6 You agree to compensate us in accordance with our fee schedule if we are asked or required to respond to legal process arising out of a proceeding related to the project and as to which we are not a party. 5.7 If we are delayed by factors beyond our control, or If project conditions or the scope or amount of work change, or If changed labor union conditions result in Increased costs, decreased efficiency, or delays, or if the standards or methods change, we will give you timely notice and we will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation. If you and we do not reach agreement on such compensation within 30 days of our written application, we may terminate without liability to you or others. 5.8 If you fail to pay us within 60 days following Invoice date, we may consider the default a total breach of our Agreement and, at our option, terminate our duties without liability to you or to others. 5.9 In consideration of our providing insurance to cover claims made by you, you hereby waive any right of offset as to fees otherwise due us. Section 6: Disputes, Damage, and Risk Allocation 6.1 Each of us will exercise good faith efforts to resolve disputes without litigation. Such efforts will include, but not be limited to, a meeting(s) attended by each party's representative(s) empowered to resolve the dispute. Before either of us commences an action against the other, disputes (except collections) will be submitted to mediation. 6.2 Neither of us will be liable for special, Incidental, consequential, or punitive damages, including but not limited to those arising from delay, loss of use, loss of profits or revenue, loss of financing commitments or fees, or the cost of capital. 6.3 We will not be liable for damages unless suit is commenced within two years of the date of Injury or loss or within two years . of the date of substantial completion of our services, whichever is earlier. We will not be liable unless you have notified us of the discovery of the claimed breach of contract, negligent act, or omission within 30 days of the date of discovery and unless you have given us an opportunity to Investigate and to recommend ways of mitigating damages. You agree not to make a claim against us unless you have provided us at least 30 days prior to the institution of any legal proceeding against us with a written certificate executed by an appropriately licensed professional specifying and certifying each and every act or omission that you contend constitutes a violation of the standard of care governing our professional services. 6.4 For you to obtain the benefit of a fee which Includes a reasonable allowance for risks, you agree that our aggregate liability for all claims will not exceed the fee paid for our services or $50,000, whichever is greater. If you are unwilling to accept this allocation of risk, we will Increase our aggregate liability to $100,000 provided that, within 10 days of the date of our Agreement, you provide payment In an amount that will Increase our fees by 10%, but not less than $500, to compensate us for the greater risk undertaken. This Increased fee Is not the purchase of Insurance. 6.5 You agree to Indemnify us from all liability to others in excess of the risk allocation stated above.and to Insure this obligation. 6.6 The prevailing party In any action relating to this Agreement shall be entitled to recover Its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees, staff time, and expert witness fees. 6.7 The law of the state In which our servicing office is located will govern all disputes. Each of us waives trial by jury. No officer or employee acting within the scope of employment.shall have Individual liability for his or her acts or omissions, and you agree not to make a claim against individual employees. Section 7: General Indemnification 7.1 We will Indemnify and hold you harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by our negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom we are legally responsible. You will Indemnify and hold us harmless from and against demands, damages, and expenses of others to the comparative extent they are caused by your negligent acts or omissions or those negligent acts or omissions of persons for whom you are legally responsible. 7.2 To the extent It maybe necessary to Indemnify either of us under Section 7.1, you and we expressly waive, In favor of the other only, any immunity or exemption from liability that exists under any worker compensation law. Section 8: Miscellaneous Provisions 8.1 We will provide a certificate of insurance to you upon request. Any claim as an Additional Insured shall be limited to losses caused by our sole negligence. 8.2 You and we, for ourselves and our Insurers, waive all claims and rights of subrogation for losses arising out of causes of loss covered by our respective Insurance policies. 8.3 Neither of us will assign nor transfer any interest, any claim, any cause of action, or any right against the other. Neither of us will assign or otherwise transfer or encumber any proceeds or expected proceeds or compensation from the project or project claims to any third person, whether directly or as collateral or otherwise. 8.4 Our Agreement maybe terminated early only in writing. We will receive an equitable adjustment of our compensation in the event of early termination. 1115 If a provision of this Agreement is Invalid or Illegal, all other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. GC -CMT Revised 9/1/2013 Page 2 of 2