HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-01-12 Park Board Minutes 1
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:30 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JANUARY 12, 1999
_________________________________
MEMBERS PRESENT: Dave Crowther, Dave Fredlund, Phyllis Kohler, Andy Herring,
Jean Rydell, Beth Hall
MEMBERS ABSENT: Becky Bennett, John Dovolis, Andrew Montgomery, Tom White,
Bill Jenkins
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS PRESENT: Marjorie Ruedy, Christine Weymouth, Doug Johnson
__________________________________
I. APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER 8, 1998 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 8, 1998 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Beth Hall SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. ASSET BUILDING - YOUTH GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
Mr. Keprios thanked Ms. Kohler for arranging this topic to be discussed with the Park
Board. He explained that the Park Board did receive handouts and pointed out that the
School District has put in motion an Asset Building Committee Task Force that Doug
Johnson and Christine Weymouth will give us an update on.
Doug Johnson, Director of Community Education Services and Facilities for the School
District, explained that in 1993 the school district administered a survey to students in
grades 6th through 12th. He indicated that the survey was designed by the Search Institute,
which is right here in Minneapolis, and the purpose of the survey was to measure
behavioral assets in the kids. At that time there were 30 assets that they had identified
that were measurable and that could be linked to what they call risk behaviors, such as
drug use, alcohol use, premarital sex, and a whole list of items that parents do not want to
see their kids involved with. Therefore, what was established through the research was a
direct correlation between the number of assets that kids have, the more assets the kids
have the less likely they are to have risk behaviors.
Mr. Johnson pointed out that the kids who were surveyed in 1993 who were sixth graders
are now seniors. Therefore, they are planning on doing another survey and commented
2
that a lot of the surrounding communities have been involved with this steadily for the
past four or five years. Mr. Johnson indicated that the school district has put together a
strategic plan but they also recognize that something needs to happen within the whole
community. Clearly anyone who is involved with kids has the potential to be an asset
builder such as the athletic associations, houses of worship, etc. In addition, this can
actually go beyond the community to where kids work and chose to spend their time
whether it’s the YMCA, library, etc. These can all be asset builders.
Mr. Johnson stated that he doesn’t want to spend a lot of time discussing what the Search
Institute does because that is already in the packet that was given out. The first
information packet is about what assets are and how they impact kids and the second
packet indicates what the survey is like and what is it intended to measure. Mr. Johnson
explained that in the last couple of months Ms. Weymouth and himself have put together
a steering committee to initially begin an effort to look at asset building and how it could
be carried out in this community and start to put together a plan.
Christine Weymouth, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Education, thanked the
Park Board for having them. She indicated that it was about a year ago that they sat down
and talked about what they wanted to do as a part of their strategic planning process in the
district. She noted that one of the things that came up was how to get their arms around
asset builders, how do they define that as a community and what role will the school
district have in making it come to life.
Ms. Weymouth indicated that as they move forward she sees this as a four tiered process
that they will go over the next year as they meet with different groups. The first one is in
the area of education, she thinks that there is sort of a fundamental understanding to
simply say what are those things that the folks who have been looking at this for quite
some time think are valuable and what is meant by building assets in our kids.
Ms. Weymouth indicated that she would like to look at five fundamental things. First, an
on-going relationship with a caring adult and however that plays out whether it’s a
structured kind of thing or whether it’s something that kids can simply refer to that’s
important. Second, a safe place for the structured activities. Third, a healthy start, a
component of a lot of this talks about children, young children, success by six where they
talk primarily about health care and that can be many, many things. Fourth, marketable
skills through effective education. In other words, how can we really begin to get our
kids up to the standard level of skill. Finally, an opportunity to serve and that’s where the
survey component comes in. How can the kids learn the value of giving back to the
community.
Ms. Weymouth indicated that the second part of the tier is the survey. The survey will
probably be given in the fall to kids in grades 6 through 12 in which there will be a
number of questions asked in order to give us a baseline of data. With this data they can
begin to see patterns and look at how our community and schools can take this
information and learn from it.
3
Ms. Weymouth indicated that the third part of the tier is to begin to pull results of the
survey together and come forward with the community and talk about what it means and
look at what the kids have told us about what they think. The last part of the tier is to
begin to have conversations with groups such as this and begin to look at strategies and
efforts. Ms. Weymouth commented that one of the biggest challenges she sees is how to
involve all of the necessary people who want to be involved and not alienate any people
in the process.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he was informed by Mr. Hughes that when the time is right the
Park and Recreation Department will be invited into the process because it is a very big
part of the children’s lives. Park and Recreation has a huge impact because of the contact
kids have with coaches, instructors and staff in general.
Ms. Kohler informed the Park Board that Mr. Keprios recently gave a presentation to the
Rotary Club which was superb. She explained that the presentation was on building a
climbing wall as well as having an area for skate boarders and rollerbladers, etc. She
noted that it would be an area for the adolescents who have been more or less forgotten.
She indicated that she was thrilled to hear that Mr. Keprios was seeking funding from the
Rotary for something like this. Ms. Kohler indicated that the Park Board is a very
powerful board and part of the problem is that it seems to operate in isolation within the
community. She noted that the Park Board has spent a lot of time talking about whether
or not to put a portable toilet in at Wooddale and although taking care of the properties is
important, through this group we deal with thousands of children. Ms. Kohler pointed
out that she once counted up the number of hours her son spent with his hockey coach
compared to his teacher and it was very clear that the hockey coach spent more time with
him and had more of an influence over him.
Ms. Kohler explained that where this board can come in is when we talk about
reallocating resources within the city so that when these volunteers come upon a child
who has a problem there are resources there. She noted that where the power comes in
for the Park Board is when they are out in the community interacting with the politicians
and city officials.
Ms. Kohler made one final comment that the family also needs to take responsibility
because if they don’t take responsibility for a child nothing else will work. She then
noted that that she encourages everyone to offer any help they can to Mr. Keprios to get
funding for this type of facility because it could do a lot of good.
Mr. Keprios noted that they kicked around a lot of ideas and noted that the teenage group
seems to be the most “at risk group” and are the most challenging age group to provide
recreational opportunities for. Teens need a place to hang out with their friends and with
the opposite sex. He indicated that this group doesn’t want to be programmed and they
need more high-risk activities. Therefore, he threw out a lot of different ideas for the
Rotary Club to consider such as the climbing walls, skating parks, bike tracks, etc. Mr.
4
Keprios stated that they also let their coaches know that youth recreational athletic
programs are not about winning and losing but rather about having fun, developing youth
and teaching kids how to win and how to lose in a game setting. In many cases, these
coaches and instructors are substitute parents. Park and Recreation is a lot more than just
facilities, equipment and maintenance and we recognize that and work hard to accomplish
those goals. It takes a community as a whole to work together to accomplish these goals
and develop healthy youth and that’s why it was great to be invited to the Rotary meeting.
Mr. Johnson indicated that he will keep everyone up to speed on what is happening.
III. EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
Mr. Keprios indicated that in the packet that was handed out there is a preliminary rough
draft which will eventually be put into the updated comprehensive plan. He stated that
it’s obvious we don’t have $767,000 to spend in 1999, however the City Manager has
asked him to come up with a list of what he would probably need in 1999 and then put in
a plan for the next five years followed by a long-range future column. Therefore, he
stated that he would like the Park Board to look over the list and see what they think as
far as priority as well as what we should be doing and not be doing. He explained that
staff put together this list from what they think as well as what they hear from the public.
Mr. Crowther asked how much of this is really necessary and are there some things that
we could live without. Mr. Keprios replied that there certainly are some things that can
be tossed out such as the upgrade of the tot lot fields in the year 2001. Also, the jury is
still out on the keyless entry system. He noted that we also could live without any
additional picnic shelters. Mr. Keprios stated that he sees some items as needs and other
items more as a desire. Mr. Crowther asked what are items in the current year that are
need versus what you would like to see. Mr. Herring commented the he would put as a
very high priority the equipment at Wooddale Park and Normandale Park.
Ms. Rydell asked how critical is the entry to Arneson Acres that has been talked about?
Mr. Keprios replied that it is something that the historical society would like to see done
more than anyone. However, he noted he feels that, if necessary, it could wait awhile.
Mr. Herring asked about the boards at Creek Valley and questioned if they were just
painted would that help for a few more years. Mr. Keprios replied aesthetically, yes,
functionally they are shifting and there are some big openings where fingers can get
caught, etc. We are to a point where they really need to be replaced. However, maybe
with some maintenance they would last a couple of more years.
Mr. Crowther asked what is the likelihood of getting any money this year? Mr. Keprios
replied that it’s actually pretty good, however, we will not be seeing $700,000. He
explained that there could be some money coming out of the utility fund which we used
to receive in the past. Mr. Crowther asked Mr. Keprios if he does receive money does he
5
already have prioritized what he would like see done first. Mr. Keprios responded that he
feels the pathways and playground equipment are tied for being done first, with parking
lots at a close second.
Mr. Crowther asked Mr. Keprios when he will know whether or not he will receive this
money in which Mr. Keprios replied he should know within the next four weeks. Mr.
Crowther asked if this could be brought up at the next meeting with all items being
prioritized. Mr. Keprios commented that there needs to eventually be a set schedule to
follow because deferred maintenance doesn’t pay.
IV. OTHER
A. Athletic Association Meeting - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that on
January 27th they will be meeting with the presidents of the athletic associations at
Arneson Acres. He indicated that they will be discussing various items including the
budgets which were brought up at the last Park Board meeting.
B. Wooddale Park Comfort Station - Mr. Keprios indicated that there was no formal
motion passed by the City Council on the comfort station at Wooddale Park. He
indicated that he was directed to go back and work with the neighbors so that a permanent
facility will be placed somewhere in the park. Mr. Keprios stated that he is now in the
middle of trying to form a neighborhood committee and at this point he is just going to
get it done and keep it out of the process.
C. Four Park Board Members Leaving - Mr. Keprios indicated that there are four Park
Board members leaving. They are Andrew Montgomery, Jean Rydell, Beth Hall and
Dave Crowther. Mr. Crowther indicated that he would like to thank Andy, Jean and Beth
for their extended tours of duty. He noted that he would also like the minutes to take
special note that Andrew Montgomery and Jean Rydell have served on the Park Board
since 1984 and they deserve a special thanks.
Mr. Keprios noted that each year the School Board changes their liaison to the Park Board
and Ms. Kohler will no longer be with the Park Board. He then thanked everyone for the
wonderful job they have done.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Jean Rydell MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:30 P.M. Beth Hall
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.