Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969 05-07 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular'T j� d' is - '^.'+• ..Lt EV .....,...._V HELD WL HALL U. W. Lnils, 0--virman; or iv't:(� P;Co 1�. Untt, Cliff I': 'C•E:ia: r.'�' ,,o:°1-o.sca. why rjes 0.1ag end Sats Hlughes a` f: '�rs:30�lt: Fred ?smisicgto-a ar.d Kwan Sorencer., L�_Z_!Cov al of All, .1 2 ; 19"- i�p�ein Ii�t�cti�g,� 4r. Iizgent monisd t5at the April 2, 1969 CaEnmisaion 'Minutes be approved -.s s=�h ns L�. ®d . ? �. �obas8n sic ; --led thn r�otio;a. knll Votsd Aqe. i��tioa }.. �':f'i)r._-��;g) G?"t?�?f,�:�"4.. yam?;: 1't._tiaaE.c'?'S �..�,''_•(3fSs �"'l••(38� Ttr. I w aine�:raa raportc• t that Itr. "inn Ila;r' s of i.:d d est Plannirg, '73,m S&c :isna?, the tSP-, property, the Del Edge and South _. Cle-,l Estate-- ha,_1 been ziect:ing for a year r to dlscasv the Of iliL' ps W �:y . ?'[ca' Eje_,7€jci er now fel L that he was ready to e:OL Caritlis ilon Teview. preec.7ited thc. prc:pooad plate rhich indicates a double crf '71-agle f t_:_7' ? ;V d;.., IJ in'O CC3t Of 0,Ak. �W AVC-iit� and alcn- West 72n tti, l�.s; �� 65; �r �.� } � u � o s_ Blvd. 3.he n nom east of Bristol Blvd. to ?--_'z!E;tin- 1Xftce: {7j1Gta-icz rE' suggested for office parking. per, J in. e tt,� r is W S� �t 4'i 3`..'?L?T + is sugge-s ted as R-3 and R-4 1.be; C Val-! Cr p::v,moi&>zo to ca force and tree buffer ';2nd St—I-::ct ='res^-ne re is E;U.i. to so:$:e'::?"x till office and the e:1G��q'"57, i. �. 4�'Yi '�. i�' $. i �.°.ilj .kr.: aa:1L'1c.1�.j e::Y C.�.'.s to2he north. d: .LU fih[ first stiep t_"''Tsang many. After the .. = i' i his t-,er -,n r -n ,e:c�, Lyse t�ropar y t,Cva'wd I�a� a to be platted and the t:`-- E,-327 •dc-VaIr-r'1e<!.<nt 4)s i'�6 be V.1-ta. R- a j:�=e`�." .first then I1-4, R-3 and lastly. "r. 'i°.".•�.'ua3.{'; Li _t'f:: �"t� eJF O:,klmusl? INTe? uf-* sr�.ad+t: ti let he had lived In Ln.'�SP �7cu'_e o f "i e .._ :a:, mid had �lcnm 001 � z_V-' L the giatJ�'l Operation =:r t<ja- !.t-:_gth of Ue indicated <;'szzt he was amcious to have the ,� vq)�ti 2;� dc -,,-,eloped : ca4i he hop,=d th R --I area would be developed first. noted w a t _ 4. vz,-. tip: rib t. -le he had sza�a a this latest pro - :CS r:::i.<, z7o%,, r Z. - ''.F aC"t?`_}SS:t� aie�u�'x'{{'"..sl ::t with :i L. -ge Pre% 3'i.elent, stated that Mr. picIbertss is P-1-6Operty haS 'Cee i.l�' �3I ts,, P�r. Robertss�(1 g;at)''kF'ys?7"y s3e C'prCst lE+s R. -I. Vii... :Felt 2::.'v i':'3%'3"<.•i".^3'P,'iJi t'r'��,�.,,L]'Diri1.. Hay f, 190 Xlz. Rv�". Skogpz-ad, eathc:-:.'--c-a Trail, inquired about the present -p :a of (j*n I .� - otated that he v8s Gure the parking -��::o I '� a -a. Hc Oil 11-1 pTopeTt-y &-nd that it. shoulcl be stopped. Traffic 53a eav- ,7 all da -y lorzg % ., Ln and ou- of the area. Jim Sackrison stmtad that '&z. Roberts wanted to have the -a�ditf.cmal Var"-d-up f or o 2 ce parking behin6i the prcsant office site. � Ni- AEtar, cr-znsidarebie discuscl0n, Mr. Hoisington pointed out to those gnthered, th--"- the develDper fires a right to a3k for xezoning as abown on, the .�ropo�al. 12ethcr the: Ci7irtr,ssion ar Council wo�uld agree in whole or in part with thio plea uiazs not. tha Purpose Oz the Meeting this evening. Vr.e pUrPOSe Might VAS to present Ithe proposal to the Ccxmission for their reviev an6 your coaDnent. th-M t 2- 2. Miles "Iona tr-W--tion, Co. (Sce Report 8-7-66) for study. 111r. 11ol---4-ington reported th"st the property under discussion Is located in the quv.Jr.-,-,t of Vornor, Avenue and Clinger Road. 11vis"nSton -Intzoduced David Beanett, architect for the developer. 11-r. Bennett stated that he was beforCft the Comission to seek their plidr-i� .,.ce Ozi 1-10"I his Client sho-uld proceed on the project. in August, 1968, the G=7ilssion indi<-x-ted ithat R-3 devulopm�---P-t v,20 mare applicable than C rr.1p ny 4 -its s . e di e on om 145'les Co-astraction a wn oT. r cti fr the Planning V-0-04miosion ca,out being willinZ to lock at R -A. construction Gt:-Ir.d.ards would mcaa larger buildings and largeT units with R-311 density. The p-urpose being, to have tj,)e units In fewer buildings. rlr. Hotalng:on toted that Hiles Con3truction Company could begin cons trrcoon of &n R-4 building 4_mmcdiately ap Lots I through 5 if they Yfould in?osa a deed restriction. on the property limiting the number of .a 20. Fne Council an6 ?!an-_jr-S Cormisslon have already approved n --A with Ohal: butsince restriction never became reality the r,rdinLnce -jan nc;: published. aedizional discuazion, Mr. Hilatt rzoved that he would be to gD alnng 6-ith fewar buildinSjs and =ore open space. / Hit. Hur-b.'s'a Tito-pethat the 07imission. recommend R--3 density w th R-4 yotu I tb.rovgli 5, MaGn-,-.. Addition. 11e ate ted he would -itionel ro ar thia F'O'n-5,11Z to add tv to the fon Carried. n V J- - lall e ngation. A- Vote Hot Y -4,C1 --'art- Oliu(-,er Rocd, that he would not be in r_adothe this pr-oject to encroach any further r nj.�. to th'a s�'-Ut'l'lz c'_r wlao'* 4�: * 9 ,,r..n:, .�� i�:a•....i .,.1.�-,....�'i:..�cY .. _�.(...s may 7, .�, a} 3. Mr. Foi.ainguy-,. repo -,--ted that the UaUa property is located between di'?s, �:a I' zed sae1. T.H. -00 jtt;.;t sso:ath of Eftn Avenue. Fie also noted that. it J,ad be --n to the developers of the property that the Staff �-rosild c;c &n roznbly o., a high rice type of fac=ility, either multiple or at° :icy. Its 11-r.. Robert Cernty v.-nd 14r. Ibs from Gurney Mr. Carney noted that the site has some problems, one is its Cur o is and the other f3 the deep depression near the center of *Ips site. nece;3e of the de:pressica, ,;e would have the opportunity for underground pEarkin,'g. The propose is for a 14 story apartment building with �ep prozlmatel3 240 ur,-lts. 'ne request will be for R-5 zoning and thcye --111 be e0m8 Jetb acic varian-ces needed. cte some c'_i3 cut?xion 1,,7-. I€iatt s.oved that the Co;rm:is cion accept al.y^� ise3ti�as: dam. a� I»,3;Ass�_Gscc�c d the motion. x,11 Voted 14e. 1. k7enkte. I,r. _io-9-si.n ton • eported that the VI Ilega is doing a. great deal of vo •k in tha 50 ah —4. F raizce area and we hope that what: we are doing will be benne .c:ia f -.O the { :•.ase area. Whin rfe :started this project, much coassic±: 'at:o «�xs g'? Way to F;alifnx A-ven:ne and :he traffic problems it has. ILG tie u c.. 5 45 T -Ta htri7e to T -T ys to handle the problem: (1) we can close C%_? s-rnr t ts.'ad ?!`5, de oac it, or (2) :ae can have a highly renricted wbtich will discourage its use by comaercial traffic. �-. rhe:+?s9 512as Ilalifay 41.vcnue, indicated that the closing of the street would a number of groblens and he was in favor of its c1i s1E.V> 511' Halifax, ind cased that she was not against she C100 -Ing the st ront, but rtxnat it rYcuie be inconvenient for the people I•;l;a. s: aQilc.3iuL � 51.21. yIaljf,-x, atated that she would be inconvenienced by �-.h n clr f3f.-n, but it f.Ould eliminate the heavy traffic and she would Rind other Ymayu, to get to Zhe chapping area. IlTo. W. Hauck, 5029 lzdi.rnola .oxen !c, presented her reasons why `s1v a,axti hon- Fi^S ii a'F3 w3t the L:�.6_s1�t�`E', of FI�3.if� Avenue. The -as that it: uaa &21t that �'ae traffic that went dtr�n S? :^z. G':43't3"slue a:: tile street &.si9 8 3i3brC'S�Ci�Y1L`�t�� ~✓=carrs,€"s cGuld .g:t: Iann€3?e ieavjtr€�zfla. Sha .also indicated that them? carrm .Flv� ;e C;.- a f fi c an 52 d and Indo brie ,a a and that it would increase ccnoi. :2i'rb 1 iv4,- l the closing of Halifen e`^vanus- May 7, 1969 Mr. Cco,:)er, a Avcaua,., resident, stated that 11slifax vas platits c Bron- ut: aez esd s_adi=ola was not and that was why lr.d-sanola cn ,red iround as it did. He said th&t much of the traffic on Rali ar cones Exma Minneapolis people cs well as those Vao could travel dc= Wood.3dale. The road is not wide eaacuah to accoMOodr.tr2 the srnouat of tr cfEic it gea ez— at: s and It should be closed. Ids. k-ni Davies, 5036 P alifar, titnte�d that it would be quite incon-Vanicirt for 111=1 if Che road were clossed, but that he felt it was a gc!od idea znd he would find other ro"t es to get: to his place of empl©ymnt. After coasiderable disccassion, Air. fioisirngto n stated that the staff recommended the cinsing of Ralifem sada eat to necessary easements being provided. Mr. Nugent t�ioved that the Co=ission approve the vacation of Halif 21,va .tue from the soet:h line of Lot gal, Auditor's Subdivision 172 anal >5 feut south, oubject to easement acq; inition. Mr. Johnson he motior'. 'Roll Call voted was taken: Air. Hiatt, abstained; Ma. Clay, cannot vote; K -L. Nage .t, Aare:; F!r. Jobnaon, Aye; 'spa. Hughes, Play; Mr. Lewis, Aye. k . via tt i. d ic:ated that the reason for his abotinance was that he felt t"-- rcad eh-or.ld remain ope-a as it 4.w new to see how it functions. He :rna.�.c aE ed n� �, ?hare•>er y that he wculd not vote against the closure. -ci7N2Wn.::-F�"'`-�_.1csidezaI_al_.yrct gc�Z-2 I�Tul�.iple District. ;ate I : 1 _2Gloc , :. 5 Mel'np ;.ev Hn gbts Z?_ Addition. N --i , I setr;s on noted that the Coy mission had approved R-2 2cainsg on these two late ao well es fiva others in the plat on November 1, 1967. ' here —.3 alae: a -,,drapon al for an office eevelopnent along County Ecad IS at that L4 -r -.n. h- Co%ncil, at its pkbl-dc hear -Ing withheld zoning aapr �a un -4640k the pzoporty located betweea Margaret's Lane and McCauley Citlz was pl8tted3. The staff recommends approval of R-2 zoning on both 1 mid 2, Bic --k 5, Lot E aad 2, Block 4, ow 1, 2, 3, Block 1, McCauley +�ht 111 r-_; k-2 scniag on that area bats eea Margaret's Lane �-wd 1`'z; "f aulra'y Z;'djs,,:t!A%~ to County Road 13. After uemm' discussions sir. 1k., he:s moved that the Commission on ;'.°sic b*ve �aa,red o" --s ae well as R--2 zoning for that nzn'ry Z.9a'''z cet-'ka Lane ,and Mc-Cw'aJl yr Circle adjacent to County Road .< 11�t. r,�tjvnoteSd rezoning cor.£c tma to the overall land +sem;k? .1 £t prepared .f o:- :11s , :.'Eci LTi "966. 2. Tile aja,zowed V..-2 lad rareJ,. edlatel� adJaceat to tha C aunty F.aad 13 gaol Cross Tarn interchange develop- Elent C"nd cell ou ted for double bungalow development. '.. The pr: pasej q-2 lots ore of adequate size to accommodate good do•.able bungalow con-structlon. 4. V-2 devolopment Af. the subject lots would not adversely affect time use and enjuynniant of: nearby R-1 properties. Pyr. Johnson seconded the mation. till Voted Aye. Notion Carried. 4:-69-0 Rav-enhors" Construction. K 3 Mgu+d..tiple Diatrict to R 4 MultiPle District. Tract A, R.L.S. 1129. Nr. Ha cingtor, reported that the site in question is located nc::th of Parry 77enue, z9praxitY:ste?y 600 feet west of Prance Avenge mind is cont•.lgnous -:,o the Casca.r Roberts property. It could accommodate 1-1.7 units taadtr- P-4 scrning. The property Is a:fected by the apartment rezoning moratorium ,au:t.cis bn ljftii-L cr�til Ang=est 1, 1469. The staff recommends ? p o.da.. of the rezoning subject to as road easement being provided sgome- O,crW w t::hia :he site co-aner-ting the Ralberts property to Farklawn and =.Jbj ct ao Lt llf-t:ib,f; of the moratoLimm. fFs ,sem y Drake, repre-oeting, Raze— orst Corp. tooted that —4 i-7cu d :-!c ri to be appropriate becs use of r -he proposed R-4 development lin the nrea. He salver rooted that he was aware of the moratorium which ,L-YLO, 1r cf.fect, but wanted to get the Con nnission'ss action so that plans could be Learted for the project. M . h.oiniaagton pointed out to the Commission and to Mr. Drake ti-i'lt x33: 'Chz L Lme U.' a Ba teelsan area ur-B there wa$s an orderly develop- "aie.'i: at�" a]:f" aii'��itit.les : -;'Uh tis -A to thie !r.+^. uth of, ParkLxva Avenue, R-3 to the :«znrth .and pas 3ibly 'R_.2 and R-1 on -he Roberts property. It might be to `:.yak€, to -is matter until the Foberts property development plan .,'.% �C•i�';�'.��_c'.z Est. Amstar ocm9 discs3.rasi T .�Hv. i e a moved that the Commission ,3 -r-Ad atio, ontb n �e��arer�t a4nril +tae Robea^tsyx_o_aext_y devclo�- trr F _.t'i ^_w r1 G. Mr. Rug ent sever-ded the motion. All Voted ti3►e. rnt v Tjct-'f:; I and2 ,n�.arn 2,� Arden Park III Addition. that ie.hio matter is to be continued a 0e I in -.7 . —1 bi* lot:_ 3s can chwi southr-oent corner, of Sherwood Avenue ri?.rd 64kLE St—,'at. 11re. '►^'>ig'4,'^E:i:'men I.'.: yzorosing, to dit-r de her ps: pei''l into parc eis; 4-23e n artheriV :.at would be 56 feet by 222 feet Fan.' the oguth^rly lct wc-� Id have r frontage ok 55 feet. The northe0y lot would tree, Ica width, '17,t .::xea and eetb<ack variances in orcler to pcta --Iwellin on it. The staff r--ccmiendc denial of the division. for Hro . 5igvnr`asen sz:F t:ed that is the property were rot d��-hied, 'ira. sisc-rtsen Taould have :a sell Citi: bouse and move as On is tE"'..c.'S.r.i'° to 3::aFa3�-1 `? C th a property because of the higher tax rate. y:r i 3�e:tiC aat;ts.i th.it. he felt 1 the Cotmaiusiiccn granted this —.i-r ._.._ _ _ ... . cI3�` t! st"r.3g It _` z, :at in the_aareec. he We resulting .Tots eta V.11cw and moved Mr. Llvu_icosecondad the motion. ,UI Voted Yttis pr*.sant;a to a.cJ a e:nt to T.R. 100 End iUchmond Drive. In mc!!!^ t n F:.hc L;ee t°.cr s po` tion of E:'ile property and t;:?_ r. _?r is —e to ��E' i°:11�' u saas7.aZt ids'" U� k, ;-I �lg°6r4tert,—. Ti:�S4 iCaas"1e �� �:id�Il f0t- h' g';,,`a.sv ,.3��i ,'gYii ns'i; '<nd he alai :o%ks for 2a dlvvision of that tai :y eta �-"I�iron C'_,wt ..1ii h bo tr4kcat fca~ the highway. The t 'a be V0 s"eft by %I.i' fect ansd rtects all ordinance `'xR .:taf atpr.-Ival cf the division. a_ ^-;ati th"t zhe�:ommiissi. ��a recc m• rd M-pproval of the ` :'_i e!' ?=w lot plat iocaC°.�d on ',-.he aaeot aide of Gleason vs>C"a i:a .,ii C�� Sts -j -u C`tiviL"f! S"s: vs�y�"ed i. i'E.?�.1.ni:sk3.st�'j" i:tv'unc..0 approval on r 4�IG\i ce. �y 6� ... �JLJyw `w'f.�..•'�. p{{1 z� .t :it:, .'L; r3 all- ance. a.equirem me and the staff that- the Ct --ilission reemmend approval of the Sn)hn Sfi.n seconded the motion. L11 a: „aat1... ff?Cs e i3ciy..,. lnn-y"s?.� 4 �f:ilisl:i �.� 1i3 N Lhat. 011-0 ':t?a:ce lot Plat is locate6 0�4a ho s, : sE. . ., �c� f9., .^_• � ,'.n it.°,.1rth of Pu".,.:+5.4m 3x:,c_ ia'e, lc)t I and 2 of which is 0--°:1" Tib -1 4;-InL E;s:vat_:-,° n'a. are€i-nance flRay T, 3969 _ice. rupr_�a ��:r,ved tt ar. th C��Y:.a73aioi� xecoTja nd fi_na_I_ apr'-Ov;=11 to :�a� C®arc �r.�H�i I:112:rePs acea- ed the notion. All 'doted j��_2'16tior Carried._ Soisthdale R.L.S. Vats property is located cast of York Avenue and south of Vast; 66th Ste sa`? � is the ccalt~ixfaLier_ of tiaxee parcels sato one large parcel. he staff recommends approval of the registered land survey. Mr. Jo'rns*n ironed that the Cc-mr ssion recoiaiend final L1,nvrov sl. Kr. Hiatt- seconded the meti.on.._ All Voted Ate. Notion Carried. Vl'i. 07VER 3USINESS 1. 30th card Fier e Street M27. ilo s$: gton pre3eat:ed the artiets aketch of the proposed street ±ightlag; to be ca^ectcd a,.ound the 50th and France area. He noted th&t the Cc-onc-i ; uould tdke action o:v the proposed lighting at their May 19 t'Beeti g. 2. Cpu!aty %c.. 8 ytd 70-Iey _Road Tntershan a _Flan. :.r -ioingt an reported that them had been some changes rade in etre. Ann ---e chrnc7e at V a? ey View Road and County Road 18. This was «ccea stated ecauce of the 2ndustri" dcvelonment at that location. He noted tha r €she Council will take action en elle proposed changes at their Tl --,e Coatmiscion set '-hursday, ;icy 22, 1969 at 7:30 P.M. an the special r,11--c'ting date to di.ccass Udina. Real tl ° s development pian. Adjouatumant at 10:30 r".►<. Respectfully submitted, Kc,ren Sorensen. Secretary