Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 04-04 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular-1 V o""Imse'n p 'R, Duni , &-nd T, llyn qi tlie Rarch T I-, 'i 9'� , Plcm-,iing, C'T, March 1-1�, 19731P yllarmJag CommUsion zw 'v"7e car -t ix" 'ox -73-3 Samc�,der's Sccond it to Edina, y at the r,-iorth- 100) snJ 69-P,1z Strev.1. Mr,, Luce noted & letu;v 'h;uo b,,,mau 'fy, 'piat 'C', J,ad, w opportunilty to inf.-pect t�i,�- r3-*c,*leriL7,,, 'It �ve- e. ".Mv�d Uhp, may tiazt-l2:.`#., ar; y -Jaz- to,'y yc of 'Oke 'property !-u q-usation- Mz7, as F,�-fzt, f."in wa� zada "I 1U. 'A zn"', 1pr �a cl st rl ekl, Luic --jax, a Crlk-1 vF,l ita -1 - , - �'� . 4 , ., -,' , 7 Edina Garuala. is-.oa Neighbcrhood Council pees-ie'ent. :He clarifted the bciil-, 'ovilding, voz includu,, J"LT! rezonirg; the functi-m of the drive --in banking utractl.:z-fa only is Ur , i nue noted granting of this rezoning Would not constitutc anpproval of ;.*he . inal bit'.11ding plans, which must be checked for sufficient parking, proper drive:,: --:-1y angles, to be certain all zoning codes are met. Mr. Warren Hinze, the bank president, said the -vnalk-in facility will not be available during regular banking hours,, He noted they are unsure nt this point- whether a loading and entrance protrusion at the rear of the bank buildin.,C,, will be on ',-4e rqes. or north side, Following further discussion, Mr. Hughes moved the rezontag be approved, .33 requested. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. IT, OTHER BU91MESS: 1. SOUTH EDINA PLAN, Fir, Luce recalls d that at the ?Virch Planning Co=ission mecting Mr., Dmil-A buid dents and recommended' changes regarding the plaa-aed transportation syst-ena, which have since been reVieved rad are reflected on the revised p1nn mep� He j?,.)Jr'ted out the changes made- rmmely; .1_ the removal of reqWiree' right-of-way 10 I r the -oa ct;.. r r.�CP of il'fth to 77th Street as pact of the ring route; and 2,, an extension of Park"l-an easterly or northeasterly to York Avenue has been incortoratted� He noted the mza- ineJF.cates it would be beneficial to have Parklawn continue south;:-ard to 76th 111',,treet, as -cell as northeasterly to York. Mr. Luce explained the planned land use c1han.,,3a-F-; P-ij a rasult of the modified transportation system; the ffmovnt of office, industrial, zard Pa -K'- land has been s -lightly Increased, Vaile she emu -un% of A-3 ('=211tiple) has Oaarl decveaved, He explained that because Frwace Avenue day.1..op;zent se it exists no -.-i represents higher land uses and because the e=nsuing U. -,-e east- of Xerxes .!Iveaup. Ls iingle faz:7-,, a trEnsitions of la vad use (nare ixntezke.;; along Francs: to la4er use: west of York Avenue) is jastif ied. lie noted the cvcrall traf--�Iic Seneratic-ia would be 7,,-aakfected by :hese changes, and added the de-asity along York ohould remain aud, ahculd riot be deasity of other types of 1=4 use,, Mr,, Robert Engstrom, part owaer o", land along Yr, -,,,k A,-7enue between 74th ;.,.ad 761:11 Strt:!--ts, reiterated his conce-i-n that "of all the prop:;; -lies in tel: -'s general area", thr its io ;;-he "most adversely affected," by the proposed South, )'-�Jan., He -clt that they '01,011.1 be cntitlel to their fair shave o-bE the traffic generaticna c,md be 'allowed flerl)iaty �lixed land tme development"., Ar,., Richard Walsfeld 6' Rather, Ringrose, & Wcjz. ,,:eld, statf.i:L the L4UM. flia-li U.. YohriBcn, and Kandenhall.) Study allocates a totc,.1 (4J 9,000 :r=ips 3% te n a}:3, bett---!en France and York Avenues, 74-,h and 76Lh Streets, He expla.lned that if f.Wase =5,ps ware allocated on the percentege of land wmershi'p, 1,655 t-,-ips per day be ;-,,at-nitted '%a-- the Engstrom property., The multiple, [',131-15 unita, per acre) son.bng, P-r(',:ascd in that b-,rea, bourever, eanouil-q to caly 570 trips p:;!r day,, A iro F mga-rcr, ---3zated he feele it io pvnaible tc -.Oxpl:amxii: t:re Characte'r Fel deve'll-apment with E yr-,--Vad. la-ild usnce"Ot of �a Scale,, xr,,, seem m±xed laud use en the relalt:i ely ;Ilai— Is Di: land in Cha�-- a..a.wauld eet a 1.a!ngarcus an -,Alich w Lad be f -o control m2,d-.,S'�311xJster, 4 Ediva Elan-ning Commas-.on Mr, Luce clarifol,ed that b. clause of the si-ngle devalc�prient along Avenue, the property east of York should be medium density multial.e residentiaL The land south of 76th Street should be industrial because of its pr=-,imity to 494 T.1d similar industrial development. The area of question then is that area south of Yorktown, north of 76th Street, between France and York Avenues; a park must be 1, ')rovir,ed, and the number of automobile trips per acre in that area where 9,000 overall trkps art: allocated would prohibit retail commercial and encourage multiple residential, Mr, John Hedberg questioned the need for both the northeast and southern. exten- sions of Parklawn Avenue. He agreed the land use allowed along France Avenue should 1,e more Intense than that allowed along York, from a planning standpoint emd because they, have been paying higher tames on that land than on the interior lend. He obset-'red th�.t because all of the parkland will be developed on his property, he should get some ben(;fit or credit and other land owners should not be entitled to the same density. He added he would have no objection. to increasing the density along York. Mr. Ray Rauch of Rauenhorst stated they have some, property on France Avifnoc fr(m 76th Street to the south village limits on which they feel certain compatible cv--m-ere.-a-1. uses would be within the parameters of the DMJM Report., Following further discussion, Mr. Luce suggested the South Edina Plan e-jacept T,e spp--,Y:oved except for the area between Fr&nce mid York Avenues, south of Yorktown ar..d n( 11th of 6th Street, whereir, the staff is directed to prepare a plan that would: 1. allocai.e the trips equally over the site; 2. provide for a park znd street circulation system aim -.lar to that in the present proposed plan; and 3m provide enca-uragement of ra8idea,.irl- lan,1 use east of the parkstrip toward York Avenue by limiting the use of a percentage of -,..,he trips to residential purposes only, Mr, Runyan moved the Planning Commission accept Che motio-al as stated by Mr. Lucn, Mr, Hughes seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried, Regarding the land located east of Nine Mile Creek, west of the Evangel-lc,Sl Chw,,-ch, and south of West 70th Street, Mr. Howard Dahlgven of Midwest Planning , e, Riesi!arch suggested it aright be better developed industrial, similar: to the land <- We to :,he south, than multiple residential. Mr. Luce expl.31ned that because the pzoper:, is =`.n two ownerships, by proposing wUtiple residenti!--). the plan indicater, it lavt be comi4ned as one development or, if developed separately,, it must he a low use,, He agrt:1nd 4iith Mr. Dahlgren that if these properties car, bc combined one developed aF one parcel, some flexibility of .and use should be No further acticn wzL- tW-e7n- V" Ad' outmawnt,, RESPLM-'ULVY SU i�U-TTE?!p LYNNAU C. NYE, SECRETARY