Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 11-28 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularIs 41HUrES OF THE REGULAR NEEIING OF' TIM EDINA PLANNINn COMMISAW1 1ILLD 4EDNESDAIT NOVEWAR 28, 1073 EDINA VILLAGE HALL Mei4i)ers Prez;ent,. W 11, Chairman, S P luguss, F, j {teal?, C, E. Jchnson, G W Johnson, and D Q shennan Staff Presentv A Luce, R Dunn, and L Nye 1, Appryal of she November 1- 197 lap ni ng Onmnis8ion Minutes - A motion was made by Mr. Hughes and seconded by 1r, C Johnson to approve the Pianning Commission minutes dated November 1, 1973l as suhnitte.d, All '?oted aye Morion capried, III LOT QVISIONW, LD. 73-15 Robert B Klein 702 Claredon Drive Lot 0. Block i, Holland's Ij Mr- Luce recalled the east 17 leet of Lot 12 .Lock lo Holland"s In Addition is proposed to be divided krom that lot to allow access to a iot dir2ctly north (the south 112 of Lw, Prospc-cc Hills 2nd Addition), The ?Isnping Commission and Counnil minutes relative to chat division of Lot 6 Ln 1960 injicate zlere was no opposition at that time. The proponent requested a varOAce in March, 1967, to legalize the loi, which has less than the 75 foot rpontage required at that time (tha4 ordinance was later changed to require 75 feQc at the Wilding line rather than 75 feet trontage). Discussion, however, was held over and the variance was not grontel Mr, Luce reiTerated the question at this time is whether lot 12 should be d!vided, allowing a road on the east 17 feet to serve the lot in Pyospect hills 2nd Additior, creaTed hey Council action in 1966. He agreed sign jUnaw damage would resuit in terms of the beauty of the area, and felt the drj4avay could he accomplishec in other .locations He noted that although the proponeLt hoijaven he owns the east 27 feet of Lot 12, it is shown as a utility and drainage easement on 'i he plat and is being taxed as one parcel because the lot his nevei heen 3jyjd"d tv the Village, He noted letters in opposition to the request Ove been rayeivoA ijom Mr, Darrell H, Boyd, 7204 Shannon Wive, Richard and Karol kNmerich, 7302 Ciaindon Drive, and Frank and Julie Rolfes, 9105 Tralee Drive_ Mr'Daprell Boyd, ?204 Shanno" Drivc, pevi? qed thn covenants allowing only cme t1we3ill.ng -s-knit per to in Prosectil pHls 2nd AdMijon ape in eilect until JanuaxT. 397A at which time they will be extended an additioval cen yenz peviod annss a majcrity of toe land owners in Mai additioi vote tc chang" "ho :oneLaots Mr Klein. the proponent, stated tnat when Me Or iP PrOsPect Hills was MOW, Mr, Kemp (the Wrnev owner) indicated accons would ba pr.-ovjded froi,) Hcllartd'8 lat Addition "Everyone i=lved ar that We wa; inn re ct cne Avision and proposed driveway access :','GIS CaMe Up nVY St: Wtly ;OLaUl- Lit AT has just changed hands and ir was discovered the Lavm have not oner c,vvonj :)ii;rvt- ok Lot 12 leen paying taxes on rhe anti,v im even i.�oaqh 1 own _qn nan;7 teett Mr. Dean questionon wbenhur wo 17 laM &'—n :jaw Wapedon Drive woold prooidE prclar access because a4 steepnesG and dQ1jznT2 goads qe suggested tie accaus be 1) r- V)v i C i e, 3 - ' 1 o �j s c - e� ti Edl.t:a Plaonirw Caimmiss!(.n lollo'i-;i,rig lur,�hevHughes Lh,- be den.cl.ec. he-ause L thtz? Village is tinder no aolj.5sLA'C I 7'! "i') elpprovp v9 Y.� "on at -thic, and, access could be mad,a avai-lable other io�-,atians N,, )eIn seconded # -motion- Ali L�Scvssion and vote, Motion voCed aye, except i1oflaso'n. w.=) ibstained Fool'', "61-.E., carried - III" MHER BUSINESS 1Amendnent Lo PIRD T A mot."on was made lby- Ar,, ';- t"',-5taison and sew,,I:Of;d Mi, , C Joh-�ison to approve the proposed PRD 5 ordina-Zice arm -nJmeni I allowing il .1:i)�T) co-imercial unes withir, md-tiple residence i-,11 'Stop ed, ayv, Reterencing a Leagu<-.-. of Voters study in .'ioxch, 1�`13, Barbara Bunl:t Stated the carceaswz-- was z+at ltht3 d"oe's notice of re:onings and buliUdling devollopi,,-.,,��!-,l wo�-i.L,2. like t,o see the following pr,,-x:erlurese infommal Tm e` inFs with the planner,, deve1op4,;".,, ia"­1 PU:iwiriE, C-x'amLssion hearingl; 2,: send out aotices of PL.xnl11-g ',IXMXIAGSIOn "o one. block of pry Derties to be discus-sel-, 3, not -ice w- "'ho ?J-,,,ini:.ng C:�ianission agenda on the front: page of the >,r Lbe , an,1 4. pi -ace indlcalin.g th�L ty,pe of hearing, place, timte, Mr,, Luce reviewed t;t -t- anl�, that a Pecommenda-tion sfas no - .-,1aO4! �-e fce.L,-, z*;.= ..x procedares `n3 p -,,t -1: r,es den�-s are adequate and zhere i- �� :Ieotai`.zzi 0a: I I to ?,eep zbem-,elves iufcwinK.c Ile -AdLd tht'c'a' i �COMIM,"!713�1. d-avalopers calk ',o the neighborl-If-,od, hefoz-1#a ' _;1. i. _t i L;i c:iZ*v G.e i. i ::' ; 9 i)1' t I rif'. Vilic,m-I a:fii lionte.7.mvr6 eAaso(---.ia'L ions are not i, I r -rd in Crij.€ji 1F.Irl'O" in a One -Locs*b r'! A c-i.On, and, zxlthougel 0-0 :1 e S E V t