HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974 03-27 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF !'HE PECULAR. OF
THP EDINA PLANN114C COMMISSION
HELD WEDNESDAI, IIVA�RCH 217, 1r74
EDINA CITY HALL
Members PresentW. W., Lewis, Chairman, D, T. Runyan, 'I,; Cj,, Johnson, G, 1r, j A, r1son,
F,, S,, Dean, H. McDonald,
Staff Present., G, Luce, R. Dunn, and L,-,. Nye,,
AMroval Lxt_t� 1! , 1113 Planning C Assion Minutes,, _E2b:r�ja2j_�7L -
A motion ":--o approve the Planning Commission iiinutes dated February 27, 1974,
was made by Mr, Runyan and seconded by Mr,, G. t1ohnson, All voted aye,, Yb� ion crwried,
11. REZONINGS "
Z-74-4 Minnesota Federal Savings, 5105 Edina Industrial Bou.2.e-,,,ard, PID
Planned Industrial District to C-2 Uwur.ercial District,,
Mr., Luce indicated the property in question is a two acre par cel -,:o3--,ed Planneek
fndustrial District,, The exi,-�ting savings ane.. load use oacupies abcut 3j4. of ars. acre-..
the remaining 1 1/4 acres is vacant,, A variance to allow s17 U four vides C)fi
gnap,e or, a., .1
the bark building was denied by the Beard of Appea.L3 in 1.1,371 because any hardship was
self-imposed and grantf.ng the variance rizv 1,iave set an undesirahle precedent for
increased sLgnage in the Pla.a-,ed industrial Distric-.-,, Mr,. Luce recalled tr.e proporterts
were aware Ithe PID sign o,rdinance requirements when ap,)l;cation for a hui-lding; permit
was made. The commercial district sign ordinance is less restrictive, tLUc- -r,!ZOr,3.Tlg
from PID to C-2 Cotmiercial 'District was mz-quested,,
Mr,.-. tune recommended denial of the request bocause 'Ch;3 -ezcning woj.';.d _)e an
expansion of the comupere"i z.mil dj.strict� arly harUa-llhip su11F��sedffitil- ba0c utility
is not purely a commerciiii 1-acil1_ty, tne usa for t -ho I IL/4 az,,res is unknown,
and an undesi-vable precedent would be eLtabllshed hocaus., no lbariel-lt o,:her thin
increased signage ca.n he fou kc .,
rollow1ng disc-ussion. Runyan moved the rozoninclr=q-,ae-sft be denied ;,-or th.,a
reasons outlined by Che svwc`�' and �-:i requeit fnr a �3:'.gn variance Le -:'e.-Eerrec
to the Board o,"= Appeals, Mr, C, J6hi1.s1,,r-., aecor,c,eo' 'Llie irtot.-I.on, Aj,'-I, vot,,td a�,-e,, Motiol-,
carried .
Z 74-5 hetvair Propert-iss Corapany,; We; 70th St:-,eeet, Ceneralj.y located
SOULh Of West !Cth Street, east o',F N!Te Mile Creel- R-- Sing -03 Fainily
Resic"ience District to PRE -3 P1e-nn#.-.,d 1"aside-titial ristricl:,,
Ar.1 1 1
'U,,�e ind"it"atee. th(-3 pro -posed rmject wi.A.1 j?,,Tp, :he twe parcals of `"-and lo--Zted
between the Ev3nge)-ica-1 Free Church and Nine Mile Creek; =i de-tachcd -!,oad is
Linder c,,)ristruxcion along -c-he it `s cast Razon-ing 'to YRD=3 ;s roqu3sted to
allow & 60 unit ur-il-r."ple dwe..Lting os-, ti -le site, -,41-icti toll"als 5,45 ac, --es,
excludinig that 1,�,.nd .iloajr Nin� Milt, Cr�ek to 3.)e dfj-,a,-,ted -t.) t'ie City 3f Feina park ---
land pul,Toses.,
Mr, Luce r,:-commen(`.ed I -re rut, ies*Ced rezoniY,g zkrid prl-,.-Yposed be raj -),.)m 'ed,
provIded ali
Clamed with1r. 1 -hal 100 foci is
ellmina'ted aril a giibdivition complon:ed , 11-pproval vyz& -.oef.nommandee bec-a-,-iss .xn . )inati on
of' the sxisting- 11,10 PE)xceis Would pr(. -:aide for the iii-ghest, and bes-,- a3z tor the site,
and the proposzLl. zilf' less t hjLj 1P(�v a -r,-- v,v:h tl-.c South Eedna
Plan, wniCh ident-ifles the p,Cpert-50's as a --dte it pe -o acre,
&-27-74. PlanninYT
Page 2
The road system af-te, oct" �IighwflS -as "r
Luce noted principle access for this project will. frog: -the TAI T1021"'ClUf C',Yc I (i ac lied
frontage road,, as left tums from northhound traffj.r� onto 70th !41 --met wi') 19 � prch:lAted
He clarified 70th Street will he separated, so the single family homes are, imitipic
structure will not front on the same read. ay,
Following, brief d1sc',ssion, Mr,, C., Johnson moved the rezcminp, a -1d con2r_r.! be
approved, contingent on an approved subdivision and eliminaticn of all gia(liqc, vitl,i.n
the 100 foot setback along tie creekc, because the existin.g tli,o parcels wil_' '.)e coml 5.ne(I
for one development in compliance with the South 'F,-I-j?na Plan,, Mr, ",, Joh-r,son seccn6ed
the motion,, All vot�-d aye,, Motion carried(,
7,�74-6 t1r. Gordon C,, Lewis "Le -,,,,is Enpr
,ineering, Com7)any), 52229 ?'der. Aiamie,,,
R=1 Single Fam1'±,,r R sidenc District to -'MT .' .at Tistrict"
75 —Planned -I R. t;'1'`_-7
Mr,, Luce expl.-agned th,.e .,-W','G E-ginoer-Alng Campamr has requested a fr,,.,n- yard.
setback variance which th(� p-roponen-c fecls� %ril.-I upflyad'e- "fie in
conjunction with th&t req--nes"t, he -sa"as rec-aired by t11e Tioin?d of Appeals, alae. A.1ju.stmcn9:s
t n g -or E, v
to requefit rezonina, -d -o PID so the "int. w- Conf
.1 orm to tne exis e C()Tll),It
PID zoning and allowcd under a jjrandk�the. clause, He ro-:ed the sumoun-6ii-4r, _-)-r_q
are all. zoned commercial or industi-ial, and recommended ii-oproval-
Mr,, G,, Johnson. moved 'the requested rezoning, F;_--1 Pl'n. be f1r,
Runyan seconded the no -cion,, All votcei eye, 'lotion cei-ri-d_
Z--74-7 Mr,, Folke R., !Iczor.se-n, Generally octed. at the so--_itnrvre.t co.'-'rier C':F
14r, Luce recalled that approx_lmate.y two yoars ago a --equest f,,.)i, re-;,oiiing tc
PRD -2 for 11,55 units per ac -.-1,- was approved by the P'Lanning Comm 5 s s ;_ :)0, 1) ut 'I � e . d at- I h C
Council Rezoning to�'<D->5 for 12 imtts, par acre is now requested to allcw
construction of bwo apart-trient builiings .d)-.>ve a 'Cliree stovy
garage on the north slopo, ate the. site's `;,opographic feature, , 31r..d i -toted that
altlioup,h the lles-e�,m Fdin& 9_1'an indicr-c-es sIm-,le -F n-11, I
L .4 18, - -7 di�rrm_apmc'-'�t f_x1P 1: -:i )f tqe
site, it aces include an erect off:' housing on the Tlorr.'(l si('Le ac O= 'per
acre,, AIPL, poli-ited out 1eve1opn_,rC in area, >qhicli is
is genercdly buffered licm -6ir- ('ros.st(.),,,m or G'.)urtv 'Poad Ui 1)y the, c",itirch 1L..se
or doalle bungalows, and thiz, i -J` :°-ezcmed, would be the -)utside
of the Southdale/1-494 corrilor area- "'-e
- � - r i a Al lo�-Ftes
occupies only 10-15') of the '�;Itc, thts acmnplishing : Or' 9 'Ei. . .
the unirs as far froil sin'7Ie hoves as poss-i-y'le" D;CO
denial of the reques'Led and becau's(o "I}a'�' con'-�'t:'t "4
it is 1vviolation of the We_-11-1,:,.rr, f1dina P-1FAil, in
units per ac. ' re, axid, because -'.1h's woul'i bt: -'7'he. on"iA7 jA
S.'a ric't laa'r the "�outhdale
area,, it would be a differe-n-C type of 1.aad, use than thFit ')und :r vrastem Td-na,, Fe
noted t'Ie FnvirOnlnantal Ovaj_:i_-CY COTMISSi-311 L13
Tr,, :tick Lar -,o -a, t -1-e ;_ated that, afte,r al_'! cF Vit tevelop�
menalte-matives and the im1_),:ict' :'sf ' 1could Cause.'
the lea�3t rimnage and a,,id valm.e to i'i that it would
-?een Ube �xcist.Tng ,,:nT �.e famiiv 40 l
a ;id,
C'011a;lte a b-uffer 1, ot -1
maintain a va 1-uab'11 t- s, tan (I o,'.' c rc e 1.3 y 1r,1 11 T .7, e ri a tFor I' t. o r,: c 0 -:1 ab.-)ut
15% of -the site. wolf Tic and al}cuc 7�>*:� '-_,es i. -d go.)d deal
1 97. S Pi ;MV
pare 3
ok the slope wcclu bo C,xd. d':),:n fc,-T�, C. ' V WeAuppCni, TV. haivor o, :400i
"the Widings are worked Wc the site so Me three parking lovels are unLyolmoviA w.
the rear of the buildings and parLiuliv eyposed in the frant". 9everS tivilauses
would ba IoWed in I.-ront of the exposid garages, Le indicated the aDartierY buj2dingE
will be beluw the top of the hill and �ould be "virtuaily invisitle" Nam zmsWcn1s tu
the south or along Ary,owhead Lake
Ir, Actorsen stated Se Poisi and and mammouth lighting stanlards at the
Crosst'o4Ii(:ounity Road 18 in'srsection ire also relevanz factors. He ioted that Y% -
he discissed the pimposed prnject with the neighbors, only Dr. Chris C: ani some pncpJ(-.!
from across the lake were opposed; AM majority SO this would he 3i Mal way to
baadle the property", Hu clarified thi visual affect tram acrosq •the :aks will he
unchanged, the tratkic genensted woull empty immediately onto the Coosstawn, and the
project entrance would be Gleauoa Road where Dr. bawls' drive now enters the site,
Mr, Vievarsen added Nat 11f;:4-wi '•.he ?---'i-ivnciai side", SO units are planned and althoaph
"this & something wp would Me to Wcubs with 1'11_-nnn7_ni:
figured out approxinively wQo we can ;y vKh and Mve to take tae Pareaso of taxes
Wn acarideration"
�W, Lee Imetmaken
6409 haxtare%'s
Lane, MY On proposef penjuat
As out of
proportion with the area
and traftin Dn Weascu
Roac. would bp hazardous,
Pe ""ell cQrvyi-1
chn land Muid generate
a gisM financial
inturn" if piz'reo W Wd as
Annie WAV
Ws -
and Wed Oe CeLsity a* 1� UMrs par on?! ;S
LAMUsiNent
Alb Ohl
Mr, Karl Kaufmann, Wb Wa aoy Circle, stated kivZ allh:ugi hc aqrc. TuWpk�:
Melapnonc on oo aprTh slope yould by the least expans!"o ano iont btnefic,U tW ;M
Ounrivy of 12 unils too high-.Wr QrlarUr-
0810 TOM Milo Road, agreW...
,b- Tu,,�-, Yen US ArMic �a, Wlt the pi"jso-,- ?Io:T`cr
leopardil to poopie on Gleason Road aAd Qjected rr consapncyMn W '3..1_ 9h o:.&n buildlnKr
ni chn aurth side ok the hi.4 oecausy Sag roull bu ex%rapalo visibin rron So houses
on OWN Way,
W. Mal al Sinzed
he 'alld solo
agQw this paotiqular pcopo;a.
ha.lLse the
soon and Scopy to"S
be 4 p3werinn
in Mat HU 0011 .t
en. i
Commisu. co W the oLMer,
a)q wW W
" .5 urits per aore and ind Ka" Bd
he "anorat thn:
2D=JCA—!1"r
and Wed Oe CeLsity a* 1� UMrs par on?! ;S
LAMUsiNent
Alb Ohl
,)2:1
cz a bulfur mioLit W4 sin
O., i,... TuPtNer
Y in
Y! A SO
les� 102=11-r,
saaU amg MuNtley
Tral:
A' !on Inp
'at,
Qu. fewin full the px"poW denuh, ana vvorinj n-YpL, in ininproirlave Wr th.,
area. but WdOrTed In woulu Alcor a moltiple WON, coicapm at a i" t Vd-w devs.ttf
so the oaianu& & So hill no old bv wo t in is r naii ra L sn We,
ny v1storser ass nd 1:
the Ny
A; NUMISSOn yumm
apprkDve :
�t sion
tonvey ,
in .:Y ti'
, P
� InM
an ninc
units per v
arc -
10S. AMFOM Mr, W,
AnTrAoc
U-1, let!
Y in
Y! A SO
les� 102=11-r,
�:A Men convoy
A' !on Inp
'at,
Avnlaqlng fanylep dhv':03vivn
4', ;*La
Mwvno LAO &,Vcring
nod
-Uncipt
Ne Octet!
002aulk
�rn yravcnva in Ight
'i dent:
1 C to cut
at n a0an :on
WIN Vh*
TOW
M
and �3 pot in
fyMA thn
qesvr� Q
na Plan,
U Rinyr
se:onda,
the motion.
3-27-74 Planning Commission + ": ttn?' V' ",
Page 4
llr :. 1:42."r C t. :-- (-'q io s t ed some direction TW,- Lune ne r . 7 fat el his r°e ,Js H^':`n la":. ?_a i
would Le char the developer ?.)L`arsue a 3swes density,, mixed lint; pro?E:'vz i'.A.}` A one d n?itir
general y heaviest on the north side of the hilly .in keeping with the ,:size aad scape
of than: approved earlier by the Planuing: Commission The Planning Comnissiva genarally,
agreed.
Z-74-8 Mr.: Melvin C:, Gittl..emar.,., Generally iocate_i south of Veriicn i� yera-te aiud
west of Arctic; Way (Kahl Hill). R-1 Single Family Pesiderce District
to PRD`? Planned ResiUntial District „
In reply to Fir:.-: Dick Seaberg, 6108 Arctic Way, Mr Luce agreed neitler Ifr,,
Krahl nor Mr„ Gittleman is tie owner cf racord9 but tire, Krahl has, A Fact;, proven
to the setisfaction of the city and ieg"al staff that he is the owner of the property,
Mrs Luce referred to the project booklet submitted by Mr. Gittleman, titles "Highmoor
of Edina", and indicated this part cular development alternative a 72 uric' 0 units
per acre) condominiu,n project, preserves a significant pencentaVe of the t ccs an]
involves a great deal less cat and iii. L than that which woulc be required to prepare
the site for single family homes, He reviewed the comparison of the singli family
plat aDd condomi"nion, proposal outli.n& in t`ie pr-oje--t boo le <3 -rid recornrie7_:1cd appro�al
of the .requested rezoning and concept because the donsity proposed is Lowen cnan Sat
earlier proposed and lower t:ica °:hay: allowed by the Wastovn Edina Plan, .the "Environmennal
Commission recommended approval., the Western Edina Traffiv Tas< force -report involves
significant traffic circulat&a.; changes, and the E't7"':).Y'aniilt?Xi' tai conside":1ation is more
posit'ire for this proposal v er*rus the Anile family pr. o po 3 a .,
Mr. Git'Y:leman exp_..aisea he ;in proposing the development and KOWA A of 't;'hnee
buildings, each contairing ing 24 3?,."t} i2ry condominium unAts that would be marke': ed iI1 :Q
$68-985000 price range, A three level, law profile entertainment center would he
interconnected to each of the three buildings by underground pa sageH"a7s.
emphasized this concept would Yet require a cut off he top of the hill as the single
f1mily plat would, l)1",t involves cut ar,.d 3':ill. only where the raac and b?uildi_r'.ns, w70uh
w uld "stop up and down the hill and fc l.ow the c ono)ur s id: evay -"., are
Mr, Runyan stated this project is probably an sen pt
iv{: c,Il a _ i'on'4''}'t to ON
property as has ever been "!}resented, and it would cneate a minimal impact or t i.e
adjacent res denti.eal n i Jl".1.1L7`t°h C+i)d . F'r. 1.+aw:i s agrEaek
Mr. Earl UK,, 51i3 A.cx4:: R c Way, felt the; area ,-?.f di;s i urbanc?e will be Am.i lar
for either "proposal after completion, the basic QVIon shoul i he what the oeopK
want versus whaZ the ?a.ndowrhar and developer wants Vi- 5 returi on their
and "we want to sive in .a si:nliq family apeaO. 1r, Seaherq :;,goo ed and adAnK "we I.roulc
rather see a denuded Ali" Oan any development ot!.o"r than sAlle family.
Following co siderab la ci s ussi n, Mm C, Johns= 'io e'd the r'e: iest a rezoning
and coysept presenvei be ii13prov"4ed, Hr, Cis •IOIison ; e:_ CSP rt-' 3 L'ho noticn ,,; 1f ma ie
a on tinpent on the establishments of the t"ennon Avea n c l- d u -sa
4-7., Seal'3nrg +_,%,a7t,ed "for ` ome7"'?^r". a.%?'on we are continuing to he b.ar ,assnd on OR,
subject!'although we have tI,ad known ion ;iiaay year;- w�hc?..f. ;:y l7'.: f erertc ; is',:
t�ohnsof�.:�E'`;w')c)1 ded the res!JEAVA original Cnncer`"3 vis for the Pare sF V groves and noiso
buffer, but when the open ti'_:=<= ce alteiTativy was f"i and antoasible, Y: c pes `:Inca! desires
took over and They forgo. a,.''i T the cco10;7,'tv aric ^ e -v, ^sk'at. n -if t:tt.e ary:r. '1'-)Ocitm'3
127-7v Planning Commission Knote.---i
Page 5
with cheir investTann" He added he feeWhero ave sane VikLnF 4110 -
residents who are genuinely 20nnernad about the env.,iomnent, and he do -?s n,,.)t feel
single family developmens would be in the best inze?estn of the entire =ty. Mrs.
McDonald felt there have been good points raised on both sides, but a lecis&n should.
be based on what the whole city will have left an that hill,
Following further discussion, Mr. C. Johnson amended his notion to approve rhc
rezoning and concept, contingent an the determination of a cul-de-sac. Ur. 1. Johnson
seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried,
IM LOT DTV ISTOW.
LD"74-3 Edina Baptist Church, 5300 France Avenuw South, Lcts 9, 10, 11, 21,,
22, 23, 29, 30, 31, Block 1, South AaxTiet Park 2nd Wition,
Mr. Luce nvplained ths psoporents are requesting to divide the lois in question
because !he Quo& facility has been cxpanded and additional pahking ares is reqoire&
An access from W. 54th Sypeet is also included so Ueir primary ingress on& egress
will no longer be fr%)m T.?ance Avenue, he recommended approval of the recuested
divisions because they would ne in nonfvrmance with the divisions already; approved
in the neighborhood and jecause additional parking and better access wil! be provided.
fcr the expanded cIncar-h EacIIIII10 CoLlingent on the pnoviolon of vegetation for scre(mKg
purposes-'
Mr, Ry).nyan Qe rupiested lot divisions be apprv)ved, providqc veeta ion
is planted for soreening purpones, and Mrs, McDonall seconded the motion, Ail voted
ayeo honion carried,
LD-74�.4 Thomas J, and Marilyn V Melody, 600 Navaho Tvail, 0" ?, Block 2,
Cherokee Hills 6th AdaWon_
Mr,, Luce st,-Ited a minor divIuMn uF a long f. ;e shapeJ piece from hot 3, Block 2,
Clara kee Hills 6th Addition is requevied so betzer ingress ard ngres E would be niailable
to the garage an the ndlacent existi, house. No eAdItIcnal hnild&V Mes are.
plarine6.,. therefore, the staff recomlner,dfd apprfpfal,
Mr. Q UK= noved the roquest(:!d Wt division bc anrr:)G`(�± , c,T)A f*r_ 11,unyan
seconded the motion, All voted aye. Motion carr el,.
Ld-74-5 Harvay Hansen. S721 Londonderi-j Road. W 8, BOO 1, harkwood
Ynalls 150 UdItion,
Harvey tfi,,c p_-oponentis Glarified cwo Ws were sold to one
individual who built a home entirely cn ana, but built a porti3n of tha criveray or,
the other lot,) The requ.asted division would reareate the two origiral lots out woule
adjust the side lot tine so the driievyay and house ire fmUreIr on the same parcel.
Mr. Luce stated
the rovaininq
iznanc lot is
Widabla and apprcv& ol the
division
.4ovild nW,: dispi-pt
the symmetrT W' the
neighborhond.
Pe recommended aporoval of
the
reques! with tho
s0pulatior Khat no
setback wayian:as
WXIL ho allcved for tic wouKern.1
Lcu
Mr-, Runyan mo�a-d the voquented lot diviuion ic iprrnird with tha otipalation
noted by rbe staff, and Mr. C, Johnsor, secondel the motion, ALL wed aye, W WTI
carrie&
3-27-74
Page 6
!A;-`74,6 'Oari,,i400d Knolls Consvruction Company, 5304-06 "alibu Vivo.
Lot 6, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls l5th Addition,
Mr, Luce explained the requesied division wond divide an exIsUng louble
bungalow dawn the party wall to allow sepaxote =ership, Approval was v000mmendecl
with the notation that the deyeloper will be required to follow :he ciVy V Edina
ordinal ce requiring separate sewer and water services.,
Mr, C,, Johnson moved the lot division he approved, and "r, Dean seconded then
motion, All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV SUBDIVISIONS-.
S-74-3 Metram Ist Addition, South of West 70th Street and east of Nine Mile
Creek,
Mr, Luce referred to the earlier discussion oegarding the MetTam Pripert les,
requesi for rezoning, and 03icated preliminary plai approval is reccmmended provided
the proposed 100 foot setback ftom Nina Mile Creek is mo&ified to provide 50 Poot
dedicavion along the creek and a 50 fbot drainage ease nient.,
(''r, G, Johnson, r) `ed proposed subdjvisO2 he a0proved with ab c modification
requested by the staff, Mr, C, Johnson seconded tho motion, All votal aye, Kotion
carriae,
V, OTHER BUSINES&
1. Discussion regarding .limy Ong he fight and dens inj,
Mr. Luce reeniled thac the City Loancil, wheA reviewirg the Elanenev ratLaiug,
p-roposal, requested sn opiNan from thi Planning CoirniissJ'oa as to whethep Idinal s
ordinances are still desirable as ti (I apply to the questions of heirhn an, densiij,
He stated he feels density is a factor, of the comprohnnsiss Vlars, and becouse it call
be adjosted by those plans3 a modification to the zoning ordinaEne is not vecessarl.
Ragovding the quastla& height, Im Rimynan stowd that only the R-5 and PFD -5
zoning dlotrist'l al}ow high nioc bulldlng3, and jns. ba6aisa f0se ordlnLnres exist
does not rzquire that they in used4 jo some odses Kgh Vis buildings nal be apTpoTriave
and Mt flexibility in the zoning am-:.. inance Wild not bs eliminatee,,
FoUawing discussion, Mo. A. Gainain moved rhe launstl )e infbroac thac the
plannirg ;'-'�o'v-'-,'-tnr, My he scoff verord x1d w"-*�Ih the -'vf-I '.s c-caments
and recommendation that the wily shooLd continue V�� the 71ro,52j�ILty Gj,- Vhos
nxistmoon of an ordinasce alloving hign rise consts"ailow, W dousity slorni not be
iYy zoning, but �-(� +:oatrolled by nomprabiosiva plans. Mr. Ranyan
seconded the mVian, All vo:& vyq lotion carrIO,
2. An ordinance amend." the suring ardinanan raqviring Eubmiss2on of final
development plans Yj1hin oLn year after
Q. huce clarified the crt. nance amerdment pneposej is Ar response me an earlier
Planning Commission request. Nv. Q johnscn moved he ordinance amendment be approved
and Mr, Dean seconded, the motion. All voted ayn, Motion carried,
3-27=x71 T;Iarin n r
3, Resolutiari of App,.- :dation fcr David C. Siliernan,
Mr,,, Lewis read the resolution of appreciation For David C,> Sha,.-raan, a: o"'lows
RESOLUTION OF A.PPRECIAT-_ON
WHEREAS, DAVID C., SHERMAN has been a member of the Planning Coprimissio'n for the City
of Edina since his appointment by the City Council cJn February 16, 19-70, and.
WHEREAS., DAVID C� STTERMAN has brought to the Planning Commission the lbeilef3_t of his
experience and has given of :'As time, :Knowl edge, ani talentsa
to the duties ,Id
responsibilities of -the Planning Commission,, and
WHEREAS, DAVID C, SHEP14AN han'. by his actions, contributed gre.=?.tly to the orderly
growth and development of th:D City of ;;ding and has deser-,,redly held tne, fall respect
and regard of his fello-v TneT; sera of the Commission,
NOW, Th-MITOR ,, Th,_- MP-Mbers c,)f the Planning Commisslon of -ts;e City of Edina o -,i this
27th day of March, 1974„ ext(and their :>incere appre(iation for his sevvice ; an -1
contribution and express the" 'r personal thanks to DP,,V V) C.: STFI]RMAtT for his de got Lon to
the ful.:ti.11ment of his duties and resp;ins Lbiliti asa as a mf mf:,e � of t1< ;ding '' L nn:ing
Commiss on, and order that a copy of itis Resoli�.-ion be is aii s,n._tted him a.n,l to ttie
Cit), Council,.
Mir,, Runyan moved the P.1anning Comm .ssion adopt ,-�hc^ d�c ao .urian o' �rpj>T ��c; iai ivn
for Da -41e. C Sherman, as r>eca(% and M%trusced the roso_iut.10Ti Dil, Vrizten in:z) --_'Ile minutes
of the meeting„ Mr„ Co Joh-a.sort seconded the met5_on, A],] lrote('. ;�,,-yep, Motion carried,
V:�, Adjournment
Submitted,
Lynne,,e C, 'Tvc, SeCretat-i