Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 01-28 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION % hELD WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1976 EDINA CITY HALL Members Present: S. P. Hughes, Chairman ProTem, F. S. Dean, G. V. Johnson, C. E. Johnson, Mary McDonald, and R. E. Kremer. Staff Present: Greg Luce, City Planner, and Lynnae Nye, Secretary. I. Approval of the December 30, 1975, Planning Commission Minutes. After brief discussion regarding a presentation to be made by U of M architecture students at the next Planning Commission meeting and the suggestions received for use of the Community Development funds, a motion to approve the December 30, 1975, Planning Commission minutes was made by Mr. G. Johnson and seconded by Mr. C. Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. II. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. C-1 and C-2 Commercial District Ordinance Amendments. Mr. Luce recalled that in December, 1975, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment allowing 49 additional uses in the C-1 commercial district. Action was postponed, however, until this meeting to provide an opportunity for more public input. Copies of the proposed amendment and notices of this meeting were subsequently disseminated to the various neighborhood associations and major commercial land owners. Five letters and two telephone calls, all but one generally favorable, were received as a result of that effort. The letters were presented and discussed. Dr. E. F. Allis, owner of the former National Tea building at Valley View and Wooddale (zoned C-1), noted that Mr. Robert Foremming, his rental agent, wrote one of the letters stating that while he is gratified that the number of permitted uses is being expanded, he is at the same time dismayed because many uses are still excluded which would not be detrimental to the commercial areas, the adjacent residential areas, or the stated intent of the ordinance. Dr. Allis stated that a portion of his building has been vacant for over three years because many prospective tenants such as an animal hospital and a paint and wall- paper store were not on the list of permitted uses in that zone and thus could not lease space. He asked if prospective tenants which are not listed as permitted uses could be considered on an individual basis. Mr. Hughes assured Dr. Allis that nonconforming uses could be considered individually and variances may be appropriate. The Planning Commission generally agreed. Mr. Dean moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the proposed amendment of the commercial district (C-1) expanding to 49 the number of principal uses allowed in that district. Mr. G. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. III. Adjournment Respectfully submitted, Lynnae C. Nye, Secretary