HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 06-26 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD WEDNESDAY JUNE 26, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS ATTENDING:
Chairman Bill Lewis, John Bailey, Helen McCelland,
David Runyan, John Skagerberg, John Palmer and
Virginia Shaw
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Len Ring, Del Johnson, Gordon Johnson and Phil Sked
STAFF ATTENDING:
Craig Larsen, City Planner
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. Approval of the Minutes: May 29, 1985
John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes noting
the following change: Page 3, paragraph 2, line 5 should
read: Mr. Wilson indicated that Brutger would begin
building by Windwood and develop 8 units, some of which
would be models. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All
were in favor; the motion carried. The minutes were
approved.
II. Old Business
Z-84-4 Brutger Companies R-1 to PRD -3
S-85-5 Preliminary Plat Approval
Foster Green Addition
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey
Hill Road
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City
Council, at its June 17, 1985 meeting, referred the subject
proposal back to the Commission. The purpose of the
referral was to consider modifications to the landscaping
plan following meetings with the residents of the Windwoods
and Dewey Hill Condominiums. Mr. Larsen added that Brutger
representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood
Condominiums and Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday June 24,
1985 to develop and modify a landscaping plan to present to
the Commission. A new plan was developed resulting in the
following changes:
30 2 1/2" Hardwoods
Page 2
New
16 2 1/2" hardwoods plus
13 4" hardwoods
39 4" Locust Trees remain the same
49 6' Spruce
57 12' Spruce plus
15 6' Spruce
47 Crabapple Trees 50 Crabapple Trees
The emphasis is on perimeter screening.
Mr. Larsen introduced Mr. Steve Wilson representing
Brutger and informed the Commission that they would answer
any questions the Commission or public may have.
Mr. Wilson addressed the Commission, thanking them for
their previous approval of the Final Development Plan he
presented to them on May 29, 1985. He informed the
Commission that his meeting with residents of Dewey Hill and
Windwoods Condominiums led him to believe that additional
screening was called for. Mr. Wilson stated his previous
plan had 2 1/2 times the minimum standard number of trees
the City of Edina Ordinance calls for. The new plan has 3
times the required number of trees. Mr. Wilson added the
reason he was before the Commission again is because the
City Council sent the request for Zoning change and
preliminary plat approval back to the Planning Commission
and staff for review of the landscape plan to determine
whether or not it is consistent with adjoining properties
and to provide an opportunity for the neighbors to offer
their comments.
A discussion ensued with members of Dewey Hill,(those
who voiced their concerns are as follows; Mr. Jack Forcia,
Mr. Joe Gust, Mr. Robert Koch, Doris Prior, Florence Norback
and Melvin Gittleman). Representatives of Dewey Hill
presented the Commission -with a signed petition expressing
their opposition to the proposed plans presented by Brutger.
A number of concerns were noted: The members question
whether the proposed Development was seriously considered
with the neighborhood in mind. There is a general feeling
among residents of Dewey Hill that the Brutger Development
does not belong in a area which has a park like atmosphere
consisting of 3 story buildings. The proposed Development
of cluster like homes would be out of context with the
neighborhood; the residents of Dewey Hill did meet with Mr.
Wilson to discuss changes in the landscaping plan but
residents were not able to review the plans prior to the
meeting.
Mr. Skagerberg and Mr. Runyan clarified that the
overall building concept has been approved earlier by the
Page 3
Commission. What the Commission is considering at this
meeting is the revised landscaping plan without regard to
the buildings.
Mr. Wilson submitted to the Commission a letter from
residents of The Windwoods stating they were satisfied with
the revised landscaping plan.
It is noted in the minutes that general confusion
occurred regarding the purpose of the Commission Meeting.
The residents of Dewey Hill were present to address the
overall building concept of the proposed development and
landscaping plan. The Commission was present to vote on
approval of the revised landscaping plan.
Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the landscaping
plan. Mr. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. Upon roll
call vote Commission members voted as follows:
Mr. William Lewis - Nay
Mr. John Bailey - Nay
Mrs. Helen McClelland - Nay
Mrs. Virginia Shaw - Aye
Mr. John Palmer - Aye
Mr. John Skagerberg -Aye
Mr. David Runyan -Aye
The motion carried. 4 to 3 vote.
S-85-2 Interlachen Heights
Generally Located: West of Ridge
Road and north and south of
Interlachen Blvd.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that a preliminary
plat for this property was approved by the Commission on
February 27, 1985 and approved by the City Council on April
1, 1985. Since that time the property has been acquired by
a new developer Craftsman Builder's. The new developer has
submitted the attached revised preliminary plat.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proposed changes to the
plat effect only the area south of Interlachen Boulevard.
The two lots on Ridge Road and all of the area north of
Interlachen remain the same as in the plat given an earlier
approval. The revised plat reduces by 3 the number of lots
and eliminates the extension of Green Farms Road to
Interlachen. The new lots would all front on Interlachen
and would range in size from 30,302 to 45, 956 square feet
in area. The lots in the approved plat ranged from 14,500
to 30,000 square feet in area.
Page 4
Mr. Larsen added that the proponent has suggested a
drainage easement over portions of lots 1,2, and 3 Block 2
to handle storm water from the area. The previous plan
utilized a storm sewer system to remove run off from the
property. Overflow protection will be needed for adjacent
properties.
Mr. Larsen concluded in addition to the previous
approval for this property, the City has given preliminary
approval to a plat for the remaining Parkwood Knolls. Both
of these plats show the extension of Green Farms Road to
connect with Interlachen Boulevard. Staff would prefer to
see the road extended. A change in the approved road
pattern should involve the affected adjacent property owner,
Carl Hanson. Staff recommends that the revised plat be
continued for a month to allow the proponent time to resolve
the road and storm water issues in the area.
Mr. Bill Dolan was present representing the Developer,
Craftsman Builders. Mr. Dolan presented a development plan
to the Commission that he said would provide better lots and
would solve the storm water problem. He further stated that
the pond was a wetland that the DNR would not allow
development of, and that there were poor soils in the area.
Mr. Dolan stated that he had attempted to contact Mr.
Hansen, but had discovered that he was in the hospital. He
had contacted Harvey Hansen but had not received any
comments. Mr. Larsen explained that the wetland was too
small to be protected by the DNR and that since the impact
of this proposal on the Hansen property and surrounding
properties could be significant, we should have their
comments before taking action. Mr. Fran Hoffman City of
Edina Engineer further added that when Mr. Carl Hansen
presented a development plan for the Parkwood Knolls 20th
Addition the City Council required him to develop a overall
plan on what the roads would be. The City Council has
given preliminary approval to the plans presented by Mr.
Carl Hansen. Mr. Hansen is unable to comment due to
illness.
Mrs. Helen McCelland commented on the presented
proposal stating that she felt the new proposal was unfair
to the residents along Ridge Road. To close off a road
would put a traffic burden on those residents. A plan was
approved and to deviate from that plan would be wrong.
Mr. Dolan stated that if Craftsman Builders could not
do the lots the way presented; they would walk away from the
development project.
age 5
Mr. Palmer stated that it was Mr. Dolan's option and he
moved to lay over plan. Mrs. Helen McClelland seconded the
motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
III. NEW BUSINESS;
C-85-1 Creek Valley Baptist Church
6400 Tracy Avenue
Generally located south of Crosstown
and west of Tracy Avenue
Creek Valley Baptist is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
to allow the construction of additional classrooms space,
restrooms and general storage. The addition would contain a
total of 3,780 square feet. The addition would be to the
south of the existing structure. All classroom activities
are currently held in the basement. No other changes to the
site are contemplated at this time.
Mr. Larsen added the Zoning Ordinance requires that
churches provide parking at a rate of one space for every
three seats in the largest place of assembly, at Creek
Valley the sanctuary contains 132 seats which results in a
parking demand of 44 spaces. The existing parking lot,
although not striped, provides parking for 53 cars.
Mr Larsen continued that there are approximately 45
families and 100 total members in the church. Pastor Brice
is the only pastor for the congregation.
Mr. Larsen concluded the church is situated in a
relatively isolated location. To west and south are City
owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown
highway. The site contains mature landscaping that provides
additional screening. The design and materials of the
addition will match the existing building, and parking will
be provided in adequate numbers. Staff recommends approval
of the permit subject to plans presented.
Mr. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the
Conditional Use Permit subject to staff recommendations.
John Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The
motion carried.
5-85-6 Curtis E. Austin
Lot 4, Block 2
Warden Acres Austin Replat.
Generally located south of Grove Street and east
of Oak Lane
Page 6
0 Preliminary Plat approval Warden Acres Austin 2nd
replat.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the property
measures 138 feet in width and 239 in depth and is 33,057
square feet in size. The proponent is requesting a
subdivision which would create one buildable lot of 12,327
square feet with the remaining 20,730 square feet designated
as an outlot.
Mr. Larsen added that a previous replat of this
property included the dedication of 25 feet along the
southerly property line in anticipation of an extension of
Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way
must be acquired before this could take place. The property
is now accessed by a temporary cul de sac which terminates
in the northwesterly corner of the property.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proponents intent is to create
one buildable lot while reserving the balance of the
property for future subdivision. Since the balance of the
property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be
buildable without replatting. the lot size of the proposed
lot is similar to other lots in the vicinity. Staff
recommends preliminary plat approval.
Mrs. Helen McClelland moved for preliminary plat
approval. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
Ld-85-4 Barbara Barth
Lot 13, Block 1
Sioux Trail Fourth
6901-03 McCauley Trail
Mr. Larsen advised the board that the proponent is
requesting a party wall lot division of an existing double
bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded that staff recommend approval of
the lot division.
Mr. David Runyan moved for approval of the lot
division. Mr. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All
were in favor. The motion carried.
LD -85-5 Lester Wakefield and John Kluznik
Lot 2, Block 2
Indianhead Crest
Lot 1, Block 1
Arrowhead Ridge
6824 and 6828 Valley View Road
Page 7
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the owner of
6828 Valley View Road proposes to sell a portion of his lot
to the owner of the northerly adjacent lot at 6824 Valley
View Road The division would result in the transfer of
18,510 square feet from 6828 to 6824 Valley View. The
resulting lots would be approximately equal in size.
Mr. Larsen added that both lots would conform to Zoning
Ordinance requirements, the division would give 6824 access
to the pond at the rear of the property.
Mr. Larsen recommended approval of the division.
Mr. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the lot
division. Mrs. Virginia Shaw seconded the motion. All were
in favor. The motion carried.
LD -85-7 James and Eileen Sauve
5148 Danens Drive
Norma Mader
5152 Danens Drive
Mr Larsen informed the Commission that the proponents
have made a claim of ownership by adverse possession on a
portion of Lot 3, Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina, 5015 Nob Hill
Drive. The attached agreement, which quit claim deeds
portions of Lot 3 to each proponent, provides an out of
court settlement of the claim. In exchange for the
conveyance of property the owner of Lot 3 receives a
restrictive covenant that assures no structure will be
erected on the property.
Mr. Larsen added that all three lots involved would
continue to exceed Ordinance requirements following the
division. The City received, in connection with the plat of
Oak Ridge of Edina, a 100 foot conservation restriction
around the pond which is partially located on Lot 3. The
conservation restriction covers nearly all of the area of
Lot 3 included in the proposed division.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed division will
improve the lots on Danens Drive and will not significantly
impact Lot 3 of Oak Ridge since it will still be in excess
of 200 feet deep. Staff recommends approval by a separate
resolution for each division.
Mr. John Skagerberg moved for approval of the lot
division. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. All were in
favor. the motion carried.
IV. ADJOURNMENT;
Mr. John Bailey moved for adjournment and Mrs. Shaw
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The meeting adjourned
at 9:10 p.m.