Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985 06-26 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD WEDNESDAY JUNE 26, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS ATTENDING: Chairman Bill Lewis, John Bailey, Helen McCelland, David Runyan, John Skagerberg, John Palmer and Virginia Shaw MEMBERS ABSENT: Len Ring, Del Johnson, Gordon Johnson and Phil Sked STAFF ATTENDING: Craig Larsen, City Planner Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. Approval of the Minutes: May 29, 1985 John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes noting the following change: Page 3, paragraph 2, line 5 should read: Mr. Wilson indicated that Brutger would begin building by Windwood and develop 8 units, some of which would be models. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. The minutes were approved. II. Old Business Z-84-4 Brutger Companies R-1 to PRD -3 S-85-5 Preliminary Plat Approval Foster Green Addition Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City Council, at its June 17, 1985 meeting, referred the subject proposal back to the Commission. The purpose of the referral was to consider modifications to the landscaping plan following meetings with the residents of the Windwoods and Dewey Hill Condominiums. Mr. Larsen added that Brutger representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood Condominiums and Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday June 24, 1985 to develop and modify a landscaping plan to present to the Commission. A new plan was developed resulting in the following changes: 30 2 1/2" Hardwoods Page 2 New 16 2 1/2" hardwoods plus 13 4" hardwoods 39 4" Locust Trees remain the same 49 6' Spruce 57 12' Spruce plus 15 6' Spruce 47 Crabapple Trees 50 Crabapple Trees The emphasis is on perimeter screening. Mr. Larsen introduced Mr. Steve Wilson representing Brutger and informed the Commission that they would answer any questions the Commission or public may have. Mr. Wilson addressed the Commission, thanking them for their previous approval of the Final Development Plan he presented to them on May 29, 1985. He informed the Commission that his meeting with residents of Dewey Hill and Windwoods Condominiums led him to believe that additional screening was called for. Mr. Wilson stated his previous plan had 2 1/2 times the minimum standard number of trees the City of Edina Ordinance calls for. The new plan has 3 times the required number of trees. Mr. Wilson added the reason he was before the Commission again is because the City Council sent the request for Zoning change and preliminary plat approval back to the Planning Commission and staff for review of the landscape plan to determine whether or not it is consistent with adjoining properties and to provide an opportunity for the neighbors to offer their comments. A discussion ensued with members of Dewey Hill,(those who voiced their concerns are as follows; Mr. Jack Forcia, Mr. Joe Gust, Mr. Robert Koch, Doris Prior, Florence Norback and Melvin Gittleman). Representatives of Dewey Hill presented the Commission -with a signed petition expressing their opposition to the proposed plans presented by Brutger. A number of concerns were noted: The members question whether the proposed Development was seriously considered with the neighborhood in mind. There is a general feeling among residents of Dewey Hill that the Brutger Development does not belong in a area which has a park like atmosphere consisting of 3 story buildings. The proposed Development of cluster like homes would be out of context with the neighborhood; the residents of Dewey Hill did meet with Mr. Wilson to discuss changes in the landscaping plan but residents were not able to review the plans prior to the meeting. Mr. Skagerberg and Mr. Runyan clarified that the overall building concept has been approved earlier by the Page 3 Commission. What the Commission is considering at this meeting is the revised landscaping plan without regard to the buildings. Mr. Wilson submitted to the Commission a letter from residents of The Windwoods stating they were satisfied with the revised landscaping plan. It is noted in the minutes that general confusion occurred regarding the purpose of the Commission Meeting. The residents of Dewey Hill were present to address the overall building concept of the proposed development and landscaping plan. The Commission was present to vote on approval of the revised landscaping plan. Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the landscaping plan. Mr. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote Commission members voted as follows: Mr. William Lewis - Nay Mr. John Bailey - Nay Mrs. Helen McClelland - Nay Mrs. Virginia Shaw - Aye Mr. John Palmer - Aye Mr. John Skagerberg -Aye Mr. David Runyan -Aye The motion carried. 4 to 3 vote. S-85-2 Interlachen Heights Generally Located: West of Ridge Road and north and south of Interlachen Blvd. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that a preliminary plat for this property was approved by the Commission on February 27, 1985 and approved by the City Council on April 1, 1985. Since that time the property has been acquired by a new developer Craftsman Builder's. The new developer has submitted the attached revised preliminary plat. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proposed changes to the plat effect only the area south of Interlachen Boulevard. The two lots on Ridge Road and all of the area north of Interlachen remain the same as in the plat given an earlier approval. The revised plat reduces by 3 the number of lots and eliminates the extension of Green Farms Road to Interlachen. The new lots would all front on Interlachen and would range in size from 30,302 to 45, 956 square feet in area. The lots in the approved plat ranged from 14,500 to 30,000 square feet in area. Page 4 Mr. Larsen added that the proponent has suggested a drainage easement over portions of lots 1,2, and 3 Block 2 to handle storm water from the area. The previous plan utilized a storm sewer system to remove run off from the property. Overflow protection will be needed for adjacent properties. Mr. Larsen concluded in addition to the previous approval for this property, the City has given preliminary approval to a plat for the remaining Parkwood Knolls. Both of these plats show the extension of Green Farms Road to connect with Interlachen Boulevard. Staff would prefer to see the road extended. A change in the approved road pattern should involve the affected adjacent property owner, Carl Hanson. Staff recommends that the revised plat be continued for a month to allow the proponent time to resolve the road and storm water issues in the area. Mr. Bill Dolan was present representing the Developer, Craftsman Builders. Mr. Dolan presented a development plan to the Commission that he said would provide better lots and would solve the storm water problem. He further stated that the pond was a wetland that the DNR would not allow development of, and that there were poor soils in the area. Mr. Dolan stated that he had attempted to contact Mr. Hansen, but had discovered that he was in the hospital. He had contacted Harvey Hansen but had not received any comments. Mr. Larsen explained that the wetland was too small to be protected by the DNR and that since the impact of this proposal on the Hansen property and surrounding properties could be significant, we should have their comments before taking action. Mr. Fran Hoffman City of Edina Engineer further added that when Mr. Carl Hansen presented a development plan for the Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition the City Council required him to develop a overall plan on what the roads would be. The City Council has given preliminary approval to the plans presented by Mr. Carl Hansen. Mr. Hansen is unable to comment due to illness. Mrs. Helen McCelland commented on the presented proposal stating that she felt the new proposal was unfair to the residents along Ridge Road. To close off a road would put a traffic burden on those residents. A plan was approved and to deviate from that plan would be wrong. Mr. Dolan stated that if Craftsman Builders could not do the lots the way presented; they would walk away from the development project. age 5 Mr. Palmer stated that it was Mr. Dolan's option and he moved to lay over plan. Mrs. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. III. NEW BUSINESS; C-85-1 Creek Valley Baptist Church 6400 Tracy Avenue Generally located south of Crosstown and west of Tracy Avenue Creek Valley Baptist is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of additional classrooms space, restrooms and general storage. The addition would contain a total of 3,780 square feet. The addition would be to the south of the existing structure. All classroom activities are currently held in the basement. No other changes to the site are contemplated at this time. Mr. Larsen added the Zoning Ordinance requires that churches provide parking at a rate of one space for every three seats in the largest place of assembly, at Creek Valley the sanctuary contains 132 seats which results in a parking demand of 44 spaces. The existing parking lot, although not striped, provides parking for 53 cars. Mr Larsen continued that there are approximately 45 families and 100 total members in the church. Pastor Brice is the only pastor for the congregation. Mr. Larsen concluded the church is situated in a relatively isolated location. To west and south are City owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown highway. The site contains mature landscaping that provides additional screening. The design and materials of the addition will match the existing building, and parking will be provided in adequate numbers. Staff recommends approval of the permit subject to plans presented. Mr. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the Conditional Use Permit subject to staff recommendations. John Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. 5-85-6 Curtis E. Austin Lot 4, Block 2 Warden Acres Austin Replat. Generally located south of Grove Street and east of Oak Lane Page 6 0 Preliminary Plat approval Warden Acres Austin 2nd replat. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the property measures 138 feet in width and 239 in depth and is 33,057 square feet in size. The proponent is requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable lot of 12,327 square feet with the remaining 20,730 square feet designated as an outlot. Mr. Larsen added that a previous replat of this property included the dedication of 25 feet along the southerly property line in anticipation of an extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way must be acquired before this could take place. The property is now accessed by a temporary cul de sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner of the property. Mr. Larsen concluded the proponents intent is to create one buildable lot while reserving the balance of the property for future subdivision. Since the balance of the property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable without replatting. the lot size of the proposed lot is similar to other lots in the vicinity. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval. Mrs. Helen McClelland moved for preliminary plat approval. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. Ld-85-4 Barbara Barth Lot 13, Block 1 Sioux Trail Fourth 6901-03 McCauley Trail Mr. Larsen advised the board that the proponent is requesting a party wall lot division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff recommend approval of the lot division. Mr. David Runyan moved for approval of the lot division. Mr. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. LD -85-5 Lester Wakefield and John Kluznik Lot 2, Block 2 Indianhead Crest Lot 1, Block 1 Arrowhead Ridge 6824 and 6828 Valley View Road Page 7 Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the owner of 6828 Valley View Road proposes to sell a portion of his lot to the owner of the northerly adjacent lot at 6824 Valley View Road The division would result in the transfer of 18,510 square feet from 6828 to 6824 Valley View. The resulting lots would be approximately equal in size. Mr. Larsen added that both lots would conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements, the division would give 6824 access to the pond at the rear of the property. Mr. Larsen recommended approval of the division. Mr. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the lot division. Mrs. Virginia Shaw seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. LD -85-7 James and Eileen Sauve 5148 Danens Drive Norma Mader 5152 Danens Drive Mr Larsen informed the Commission that the proponents have made a claim of ownership by adverse possession on a portion of Lot 3, Block 1 Oak Ridge of Edina, 5015 Nob Hill Drive. The attached agreement, which quit claim deeds portions of Lot 3 to each proponent, provides an out of court settlement of the claim. In exchange for the conveyance of property the owner of Lot 3 receives a restrictive covenant that assures no structure will be erected on the property. Mr. Larsen added that all three lots involved would continue to exceed Ordinance requirements following the division. The City received, in connection with the plat of Oak Ridge of Edina, a 100 foot conservation restriction around the pond which is partially located on Lot 3. The conservation restriction covers nearly all of the area of Lot 3 included in the proposed division. Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed division will improve the lots on Danens Drive and will not significantly impact Lot 3 of Oak Ridge since it will still be in excess of 200 feet deep. Staff recommends approval by a separate resolution for each division. Mr. John Skagerberg moved for approval of the lot division. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor. the motion carried. IV. ADJOURNMENT; Mr. John Bailey moved for adjournment and Mrs. Shaw seconded the motion. All were in favor. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.