HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-05-31 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING
OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 31, 1995
7:30 P.M., COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Johnson, Nan Faust, Robert Hale, Helen
McClelland, Lee Johnson, Geof Workinger, David Byron,
Chuck Ingwalson, Ann Swenson, Lorelei Bergman, David
Runyan
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Jackie Hoogenakker
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
The minutes of the April 28, 1995 meeting were filed without correction.
II. NEW BUSINESS:
S-95-2 Preliminary Plat Approval Mirror Oaks, 5000 Blake Rd
Groves Stickney Limited Company
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property comprises two lots
with total land area of 10.1 acres. Existing improvements include a single dwelling,
a log cabin, and a storage building. Most of the site is gently rolling, however, there
are areas of steep slopes along Blake Road and near the ponds in the south and
southwest portions of the property. The site is heavily wooded with 454 trees having
caliper diameter of six inches or greater.
Mr. Larsen explained the preliminary plat presented for Commission review
would create eleven single dwelling lots. The existing improvements on the property
would be removed. The subdivision would be served by a new street coming off
Blake Road. Lots range in size from 30,010 to 71,078 square feet in area.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note Lot 5 requires a lot width variance,
and lots 1,3,4,8, 9, and 10 require lot depth variances. All lots exceed the
neighborhood median lot area.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends preliminary plat approval, including the
requested variances subject to the following conditions:
1
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Subdivision Dedication
3. Developers Agreement which addresses all comments of the City
Engineer
4. Watershed District Grading Permits
The proponent, Mr. Stickney was present, Mr. Richard Bloom was also present
representing the proponents. Interested neighbors were present.
Commissioner Hale noted the site lines for this proposal have the potential to
be dangerous and questioned Mr. Larsen if anything will be done to improve the site
lines onto Blake Road. Mr. Larsen said plans indicate a gradual grade change as you
enter/exit the subdivision with a flat landing pad at the Blake Road intersection.
Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if Fran Hoffman is concerned with
clear view. Mr. Larsen responded Mr. Hoffman has reviewed the entrance/exit to the
site and feels the proposal addresses the site line issue sufficiently considering the
topography. Mr. Larsen noted staff is aware the site line situation is not ideal, but
everything possible has been executed to enhance the site lines.
Commissioner Workinger . noted the congestion problem along the
Interlachen/Blake intersection, and asked Mr. Larsen if the county has indicated a time
frame for the installation of a signal at this intersection. Mr. Larsen acknowledged
there is lag time in this area, adding he is not sure if, or when, Interlachen/Blake will
be signaled. Commissioner Workinger stated he wants to make sure the proponent
understands how important it is to have adequate site lines from the landing pad for
this development.
Commissioner Swenson questioned the lot width variance required on Lot 5.
Mr. Larsen explained the city zoning ordinance measures lot width 50 feet back from
the front property line. This requirement is additional protection against the
development of neck lots. Mr. Larsen added in this instance staff believes a variance
is warranted because it maintains vegetation, creates an improved plat, and the width
at the location of the building pad is adequate.
Mr. Richard Bloom addressed the commission explaining the Boos property, in
his opinion, is an outstanding piece of property with a vast number of high quality
trees. He informed commission members a majority of the trees are mature red and
white oak, and it is the goal of the development team to maintain as many mature
trees as possible. Continuing, Mr. Bloom informed commission members the site is
also comprised of steep slopes and two wetland areas. Mr. Bloom noted another goal
of the development team is to minimize impact on adjacent properties with minimal
grading, and the use of retaining walls to define the lots and drive. Mr. Bloom added
the majority of the grading will occur when the street is cut in. Retaining walls will
2
be pulled back at the intersection to Blake to provide a 2% landing pad area and the
entry into the site will be widened to provide the best sight lines possible. Mr. Bloom
noted low growing vegetation will be planted at the entry, and the retaining walls will
be constructed of either boulder rock or large limestone pieces. Uniform landscaping
will be integrated throughout the subdivision. Mr. Bloom addressed the issues
concerning drainage, and explained a NURP pond will be constructed to collect and
allow for the settlement of water run off from the new road. Mr. Bloom pointed out
in the original drawings drainage flowed south, and in speaking with the engineering
department they indicated drainage should flow north into Mirror Lakes.
Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Bloom who will maintain the landscaping
plantings once they are in place. Mr. Bloom explained discussions identified the need
for a sprinkler system, and the development of a homeowners association which
would maintain the grounds. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned how long the
association would remain in place. Mr. Bloom said once the plantings have matured
the homeowners association can decide how to proceed.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom to explain the 2% landing pad. Mr.
Bloom said the site will be graded at entry at 2% with the grade increasing as you
travel farther into the site. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom what he thinks the
distance is for the landing pad from the street. Mr. Bloom said he believes around 100
- 200 feet.
Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Bloom why a NURP pond in needed on this site.
Mr. Bloom explained water run off from the new road must be contained and allowed
to settle before leaving the site. Commissioner Faust asked Mr. Bloom the depth of
the NURP pond. Mr. Bloom said the NURP pond will be around four feet deep.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Bloom if the development team also designed
a scenario with access from Scriver Road. Mr. Bloom explained a design was drafted
with Scriver as the access. With Scriver Road as the entrance/exit the 11 lots did a
better job of meeting city ordinance requirements, but more trees were lost. The
development team felt the Blake Road access had better site lines, and the impact to
immediate neighbors would be less. Mr. Bloom concluded the property owners on
Scriver Road do not support a Scriver Road access.
Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Bloom if he considered relocating the NURP
pond. Mr. Bloom commented in reviewing the site it appears the best location for the
pond is towards Blake Road, but after further study it was found if the pond was
placed near Blake Road double lines would have to be constructed to meet code.
Commissioner Hale asked who pays for the treatment of the NURP pond. Mr.
Bloom said after the pond is constructed the city will manage the pond. He explained
there really is no "treatment" the NURP pond is a contained area where the sediments
3
from water run off can settle.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Bloom if a price has been established for the
lots. Mr. Bloom responded lots will average around $450,000. Commissioner
Swenson asked if any lots have been sold. Mr. Bloom said lots have been sold.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Bloom if any individual has purchased two lots.
Mr. Bloom responded an individual has an agreement to purchase two lots.
Commissioner Johnson commented in reviewing the plans the footprints appear
to depict 4,000 square foot building pads. Continuing, Commissioner Johnson said
it has been his experience, that new owners, especially on lots in this price range
want homes with building pads larger than 4,000 square feet. Concluding,
Commissioner Johnson stated he has a concern with the site being developed with 11
"castles", and questioned if the development team has considered size requirements.
Mr. Stickney addressed the commission and explained the vegetation on this
site creates a natural buffer, and itis very important for this development to retain as
many trees as possible. Mr. Stickney responded to Commissioner Johnsons questions
by explaining at present there are no formal plans that limit the size of future houses.
Mr. Stickney reiterated, as indicated previously, the conservation of trees is very
important to this development. Continuing, Mr. Stickney pointed out a 4,000 square
foot building pad is large when one considers there are upper and lower levels, with
the end result being a house approximately 10,000 square feet. Commissioner
Johnson agreed a 10,000 square foot house is large, but noted the lots are large, and
it is possible to have building pads in excess of 6,000 square feet, and still maintain
city setback requirements. Commissioner Johnson asked Mr. Stickney if he would be
willing to consider a reduction in lot coverage. Mr. Stickney responded he has not
considered lot coverage reduction, adding he is not sure how he feels about it.
Commissioner Johnson reiterated he is concerned with the potential for building at
minimal setbacks without additional restrictions. Commissioner McClelland agreed,
she pointed out recently on Schaefer Road homes have been constructed that exceed
10,000 square feet and appear very large. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland said
it has been indicated an individual wants to purchase two lots, and it is feasible this
individual could construct a house over those lots. Mr. Stickney stated the individual
has indicated the desire for a house approximately 7,500 square feet in size to be
constructed on one lot.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Stickney if he believes the 4,000 square foot
building pads depicted on the site plan are too restrictive. Mr. Stickney added he is
not sure. He explained we indicated 4,000 square foot building pads because we
believe the end result is a home 7,500 to 10,000 square feet which is what the
majority of buyers seem to want. Commissioner Johnson reiterated he would like to
see a reduction in lot coverage to ensure the property remains as wooded and open
as possible.
rd
Commissioner Hale suggested a compromise. He explained if the commission
recommends limiting lot coverage to 20% and an individual desires more, the request
can be heard at the variance level. Commissioner Swenson agreed, she added what
the commission appears to want is adequate spacing between the new homes so the
development doesn't appear to be houses on top of houses.
Mr. Bloom informed commission members a neighborhood meeting was held
and everyone within 500 feet of the subject site was informed. The concerns
expressed at this meeting focused on the new road, the suggestion that the sidewalk
along Blake Road be extended, and curb and gutter be added to Scriver Road.
Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Stickney if he intends to build on all lots. Mr.
Stickney said his plan is to build on some of the lots. Other builders will be allowed
to build if they are approved. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Stickney how many
homes he is planning to construct. Mr. Stickney said his plans are to construct two
to four homes.
Commissioner Hale asked Mr. Stickney if he has considered private covenants
that could address house placement. Commissioner Hale said he is also concerned
with lot coverage and that adequate sideyard setbacks are maintained. Mr. Stickney
said private covenants or deed restrictions can address those concerns.
Chairman Johnson agreed, adding a review of private deed restrictions can be
recommended at the time of final plat as a condition of approval.
Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if private covenants run with the land who
enforces the covenants. Continuing, Commissioner Ingwalson said if he understands
covenants correctly they are different from city ordinances, and the city does not have
the ability to enforce them. Mr. Stickney said covenants would be enforced through
the association.
Commissioner Johnson clarified he does not want to cast a negative stance on
this proposal, adding it has been his experience that Mr. Stickney does quality work,
but he is concerned with overbuilding on large lots. Chairman Johnson concluded he
believes this piece of property deserves to be developed with the utmost care.
Commissioner Swenson asked who would own the NURP pond. Mr. Larsen
said the NURP pond would be maintained by the city, but if the pond becomes
something beyond the basic function of a NURP pond, the homeowners association
would have to maintain it, or the developer would have to put "money up front" to
maintain the pond.
Commissioner Faust commented she usually is uncomfortable with granting
variances for a new subdivision, but in this instance it makes sense because of the
5
conservation of trees and less grading impact to the site.
Mr. R. Jensen, 5125 Blake Road told the commission he has lived in his home
for 17 years and wants the commission to ensure that the technical details are
correct, and the development is something Edina can be proud of. Continuing, Mr.
Jensen said he is pleased with the overall development plan, but has a concern the
future home on Lot 4 will have to deal with car headlights within 50 feet of the back
door. Mr. Jensen also pointed out Scriver Road now is left with an asphalt turn
around which should be finished. Concluding Mr. Jensen asked what the plan is for
the log cabin presently located on the site.
Mr. Bloom responded someone is interested in conserving the log cabin on the
site, but at a different location.
Mr. Charles Hanna, 6300 Interlachen Boulevard said he does not have a
problem with the proposal, but is concerned with the sidewalk situation, adding he
would like to see it extended to intersect with Blake Road.
After a brief discussion Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend
preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: Subdivision Dedication,
Developers Agreement which addresses all comments from the City Engineer,
Watershed District grading permits, Parkland Dedication, limiting lot coverage to 20%,
and homeowners association covenants will be incorporated into final plat approval.
Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Members of the Commission recommended that Council Members consider
extending the sidewalk along Blake Road/Interlachen Boulevard, and it was further
suggested that the cul-de-sac at the end of Scriver Road be completed with curb and
gutter.
P-95-4 Final Development Plan
3700 West 69th Street
Southdale Center/General Growth Management, Inc.
Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District
Mr. Larsen informed the commission in September, 1994, the City Council
approved a rezoning of this site to allow for the development of a banking facility.
Those plans have since been abandoned. A new proposal to develop the site with a
Boston Market restaurant has been submitted.
0
Mr. Larsen explained the proposed restaurant would be a 3,200 square foot
building with seating for 62 persons. There are 42 parking stalls provided. Access
to the one-way parking bay would be from west bound 69th Street or west bound
from the Center's ring road. The proposed plan would modify the existing curb which
serve this site. The easterly, in -bound, curb cut is moved slightly to the east and
increased to 30 feet in width. The maximum permitted width for a one way drive is
20 feet. Thus, a 10 foot drive way width variance is requested. The easterly exit is
proposed at 25 feet, requiring a five foot width variance.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed parking provides the required 20 foot
setback from 69th Street, and the building exceeds the required 50 foot setback from
the street. The northwest corner of the building maintains a nine foot setback from
the drive aisle, where 10 feet is required. Thus, a one foot setback variance is
required. The proposed development complies with all other setback requirements.
Mr. Larsen asked the commission to note the Zoning Ordinance requires one
parking space for each three seats plus one for each employee on the major shift.
With 62 seats and 15 employees the code would required 36 parking spaces. The
operation, however, is likely to generate parking demand beyond ordinance
requirements due to the take-out portion of the business. To address this possibility
the owners have leased 15 spaces from the Center for employee parking.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan
including the one foot building to drive aisle setback variance. Staff does not support
the proposed changes to the driveways and does not support the proposed
landscaping adjacent to the parking lot. Staff recommends reducing the width of the
easterly driveway to 20 feet and leaving the westerly driveway in its present
condition. The parking lot should be screened according to ordinance standards.
Mr. John Keogh and Ms. Shirajoy Abrey were present representing Boston
Market, Ms. Andrea Spessard was present representing Southdale Center.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen where the two other off-site facilities are
located. Mr. Larsen said Midas is located off York Avenue and Firestone is located off
West 66th Street. Both are located in the Northeast quadrant of the site.
Chairman Johnson asked if there are only three off-site building sites on the
Southdale Campus. Mr. Larsen responded that is correct. He added there are plans
o raze the Midas building to obtain more parking and additional landscaping. The
Firestone site is controlled by J.C. Penneys.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the campus can be developed with other
retail sites along its perimeter. Mr. Larsen said that is an option, Southdale has
enough land to either add square footage to the center itself, or along its perimeter.
7
Chairman Johnson commented in reviewing the photos of other Boston Market
facilities within the metropolitan area he observed possible signage violations and
asked Mr. Larsen if Boston Market is aware of City signage requirements. Mr. Larsen
said they are familiar with our signage requirements.
Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen if Southdale Center has excess
parking they can lease to Boston Market. Mr. Larsen responded the Center has excess
parking they can lease. Commissioner Ingwalson asked what control the city has if
in preventing development along the perimeter of the site. Mr. Larsen said if the
zoning is in compliance the commission and council would review a Final Development
Plan. Mr. Larsen concluded in the past the city has relied on its relationship with the
Center.
Commissioner Johnson commented in his opinion the exit location of the site
onto the ring road does not have adequate stacking capacity and the curb cut may
have to be moved. Commissioner Johnson said his main concern is during peak hours
vehicles exiting to east to West 69th Street could back-up. Commissioner Johnson
said the plans are not very clear in this area, and he believes this exit can become
"closed" during peak portions of the day. Commissioner Johnson said he does not
have a solution, but see a potential problem. Chairman Johnson suggested signage
indicated no east bound exiting. Commissioner Johnson said that may not be the
problem, it is the exiting from the parking lot that will block the exit.
Ms. Andrea Spessard told commission members Southdale Center is very
excited to bring Boston Market to our retail and restaurant mix. Ms. Spessard said she
believes the proposed use is a good addition, it is a family restaurant and Southdale
Center desires the family to patronize Southdale.
Mr. Keogh addressed the commission explaining he is very happy to be
proposing a store for Edina. Mr. Keogh informed commission members Boston Market
takes pride in the fact that a large percentage of people who leave the store compare
the food with "Home Cooking". Mr. Keogh said Boston Market has been very
successful in the Twin Cities and the restaurant is similar in concept to LeAnn Chin
where the customer can view the food, dine in, or take out. Continuing, Mr. Keogh
said our target customers are professionals who desire something more than a
"McDonalds" Mr. Keogh concluded stating locating in Edina is very important to
franchise.
Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Keogh the percentage of patrons who take-
out food. Mr. Keogh said the take-out is roughly 45%. Commissioner McClelland
asked if the includes the drive-through. Mr. Keogh said the 45% includes drive-
through
0
Ms. Shirajoy Abrey told commission members the building will be constructed
with rock face brick and brick drivit, and signage will comply with ordinance
standards. We are also keeping a large number of trees and we will extend the
vegetation screening along West 69th Street.Ms. Abrey said the building will be
constructed tastefully at the request of General Growth.
Commissioner Swenson commented in reviewing the plans it appears that the
loading dock located on the east side of the building may create a problem and
questioned if delivery trucks would have to back -in to access the delivery area. Ms.
Abrey said that is correct, large delivery vehicles would need to back -in.
Commissioner Swenson said the delivery vehicles will travel the ring road and will
have to make almost a U shaped turn to access the delivery area. Commissioner
Swenson asked if the loading area could be flip-flopped, because in her opinion
vehicles backing -in would be difficult, and creates the potential to block the ring road.
Mr. Keogh responded that is not possible to relocate the delivery area because of the
exit to West 69th Street. Continuing, Mr. Keogh said we could require deliveries to
be made before 10:00 a.m. to avoid congestion.
Commissioner Swenson asked Ms. Abrey if the trash area will be screened.
Ms. Abrey said the trash area will be screened, it is located near the loading area, so
both will be screened.
Commissioner Runyan commented in reviewing the plans you show a "dock
area" and it really doesn't appear to be what one traditionally views as a loading dock
area. Ms. Abrey agreed, she said there is no "dock", just a delivery door.
Commissioner Runyan noted if he heard correctly Mr. Keogh mentioned "Cisco"
delivers the products, and in his experience their delivery vehicles are long, so when
a delivery occurs the trucks will be sticking out into the drive aisle. Mr. Keogh said
this store will be a "satellite" store where food preparation will be minimal so the
delivery vehicles would be vans. Commissioner Johnson commented Ms. Spessard
may need to address this issue, because it affects the patrons of the Center. Ms.
Spessard said this is a concern, she said the Mall opens at 7:00 a.m. for walkers, so
deliveries should be before 7:00 a.m., and any ingress/egress problems resulting from
this proposal are a primary concern for the Center. Ms. Spessard said the Center
imagined a small van for deliveries, not a semi -truck vehicle.
Commissioner Runyan noted in reviewing the plans there appears to be a
canopy, adding he would not be comfortable if the canopy was back -lit.
Commissioner Swenson pointed out the down zoning of the site created the
opportunity for a restaurant to be located at this site. Continuing, Commissioner
Swenson said in the future she will proceed more cautiously when a rezoning is
requested. She added while she supported the down zoning from PCD -4 to PCD -3 to
allow a bank, she acknowledged she has a problem with retail use along the perimeter
E
of Southdale.
Commissioner Ingwalson agreed with Commissioner Runyans observation on
the canopy, adding in response to Ms. Abreys information on exterior materials that
he is not in favor of drivit, and would like to see more brick. Commissioner Ingwalson
said he has visited the new Boston Market in St. Louis Park and likes the look of that
store, suggesting that the Edina facility be constructed to resemble it.
Commissioner Byron said his reaction to the proposal is that it would be
wonderful to have a Boston Market located in Edina, but not in the Southdale parking
lot. Continuing, Commissioner Byron pointed out while parking may be ample during
off-season, the parking during christmas season is heavy, and employees are bused
to and from work to an off site location. Continuing, Commissioner Byron stated he
does not want the Southdale campus to resemble Eden Prairie, and has a concern with
the potential for development along the perimeter of the center.
Ms. Spessard responded every center within the Metro area buses employees
during high season. She concluded Southdale Center has a seasonal parking program.
Commissioner McClelland asked Ms. Spessard if Southdale Center has
considered the issues raised this evening, and if an agreement has been entered
between Southdale Center and Boston Market. Commissioner Johnson interjected and
asked Ms. Spessard how the center feels about the potential for stacking problems at
the exit, and the issues raised regarding the loading area. Ms. Spessard in response
to Commissioner McClellands comments said the Center has not met with the anchor
tenants regarding the proposal. Mr. Keogh responded Boston Market will be meeting
with them sometime next week. Continuing, Ms. Spessard said the issues regarding
the loading dock and potential for stacking problems at the exit during peak times has
not been thoroughly studied, as previously indicated.
Commissioner Ingwalson asked if the anchors have approval over outlot
development. Ms. Spessard said anchor tenants have to approve outlot expansion.
Mr. Keogh said the only tenant that has jurisdiction over this parcel is Mervyns. Mr.
Keogh said he has a verbal agreement, but as indicated the formal meeting is next
week.
Commissioner McClelland said she finds it odd that the commission is hearing
the proposal before formal approval has been given from the anchor tenant.
A discussion ensued focusing on the potential for stacking problems at the exit,
the possible conflict with the loading dock, and the future plans Southdale Center has
for the outlot locations.
10
Commissioner Byron moved to table the proposal to allow time for Southdale
Center to indicate to the City their position on future development plans for the center
and if there are plans for outlot development along the perimeter. Commissioner Hale
seconded the motion.
Commissioner Johnson agreed with the motion to table, adding his concerns
are more site specific and before making a decision he would like to see a complete
site plan (including loading area), ring road, traffic circulation pattern, and the overflow
parking scenario as mentioned by Commissioner Byron. Commissioner Johnson said
he feels he needs to look at a broader picture, reiterating he would like to see the ring
road circulation. Commissioner Johnson asked that his request be added to the
motion. Commissioner Byron and Commissioner Hale accepted Commissioner
Johnsons suggestions. Motion to table P-95-4 carried.
Mr. Keogh commented in his opinion Southdale Center has adequate parking,
due to the fact of the addition of ramps, and questioned if the flow structure was
examined when the banks was proposed. Mr. Keogh said he believes in listening to
the discussion this evening this proposal is "caught" between the City and Southdale,
and the majority of the questions regarding circulation and outlot development have
more to do with General Growth than with the proposal this evening.
Commissioner Byron said as far as he is concerned he does have an issue with
outlot development, but Commissioner Johnson appears to be more site specific.
Commissioner Johnson said he does not remember everything regarding the
proposal for the bank, but believes the site plan has changed concerning the
ingress/egress. Mr. Keogh acknowledged the site plan is different. Commissioner
Swenson interjected the bank did not have a back-up situation onto the ring road.
Commissioner Bergman commented the bank building was also smaller.
Commissioner Ingwalson expressed frustration if the zoning is in compliance
there may be nothing the city can do to prevent outlot development on the Southdale
Campus. Commissioner Ingwalson said he feels the city should become proactive, not
reactive, and agreed with Commissioner Byron that we should ask the Center their
future plans for outlot development.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if the city has a proof of parking
agreement with Southdale. Mr. Larsen responded Southdale has always met the
parking standards so no proof of parking agreement has been entered.
Chairman Johnson commented to Mr. Keogh this request has been tabled, and
he can indicate of planning staff when Boston Market would like to be re -heard
11
LD -95-4 Lot Division, Lot 2, Block 3, Parkwood
Knolls 22nd Addition and Lot 5, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 325 Dave Moskal / 5119 Green Farms Road
Mr. Larsen informed the commission the proposed lot division would transfer
4,877 square feet from the property at 5120 Ridge Road and attach it to the lot at
5119 Green Farms Road. The proposed division would allow the construction of a
swimming pool at 5119 Green Farms Road without the need of a variance. Both
properties would comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements following the division.
Mr. Larsen concluded Staff recommends approval.
Commissioner McClelland moved lot division approval. Commissioner Swenson
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
III. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Hale moved adjournment at 10:10 p.m.
12