HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 07-08 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularMINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
JULY 8, 2015
7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Answering the roll call were: Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Halva, Nemerov, Olsen, Platteter
Absent: Carr, Forrest, Seeley
111111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Commissioner Hobbs moved approval of the April 22, 2015, meeting agenda. Commissioner
Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. t.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None
VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Variance. SunOpta. 7301 Ohms Lane, Edina, MN.
Planner Presentation
Planner Repya informed the Commission Sun Opta is requesting a variance to allow the
installation of a 58.75 square foot wall sign on the top floor (6`h story) of the east elevation of
their building at 7301 Ohms Lane. The subject property has one street frontage on Ohms Lane;
the east elevation abuts the office building at 7300 Metro Boulevard. Sun Opta is a tenant
within this office building.
Repya explained that Edina's sign code # 36 - 1715 provides for one wall sign and one
monument sign per street frontage in the POD Planned Office District. For buildings five
stories in height or greater, the total sign area of the two signs may not exceed 120 square feet
total, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet in area.
Repya reported that currently there is one monument sign on the west elevation facing Ohms
Lane measuring 56 square feet, advertising One Corporate Center with tenant identification.
The code would allow for a wall sign measuring up to 64 square feet to be added to the west
elevation.
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends denial of the requested variances based on the
following findings:
1. The proposal does not meet the required standards for a variance, because:
The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be
installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting Ohms
Lane.
2. The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly
located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway 100.
Appearing for the Applicant
John Ruelle, SunOpta
Discussion
Chair Platteter asked Planner Repya what the zoning designations are for the properties
surrounding the subject site. Repya responded that the surrounding properties are zoned
POD, Planned Office District.
Applicant Presentation
Mr. Ruelle told the Commission he questions the City's definition of street frontage. Ruelle
presented to Commissioners photos of neighboring buildings with signage similar to the sign
they are requesting. Continuing, Ruelle further pointed out that the subject site also includes
an easement to Metro Boulevard and Highway 100; thereby accessing Highway 100.
Continuing, Ruelle questioned why the sign ordinance wouldn't allow their sign to face Highway
100, adding its key for their business to "get their name out" so it becomes recognizable to not
only residents of Edina but the general public. Concluding, Ruelle told Commissioners SunOpta
has a long term lease with this building.
Commissioner Nemerov commented that he assumes the applicant and their landlord are
aligned. Brandon Aune, representing the sign owner responded in the affirmative.
A discussion ensued on the photos Mr. Ruelle presented indicating similar signage on nearby
buildings. It was noted that the majority of those buildings are in the City of Bloomington; with
a different sign ordinance.
Public Hearing
Chair Platteter asked if anyone would like to speak to this issue; being none, Commissioner
Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion.
Public hearing closed.
Page 2 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
Discussion
Commissioner Nemerov reported he worked in the subject building and at that time there was
a sign on the building facing Highway 100. Nemerov said in his opinion allowing the sign makes
sense. ,
Commissioner Lee asked Planner Teague if the sign ordinance was re -written. Planner Teague
responded the ordinance wasn't re -written; however, there are unpermitted signs in the City.
Commissioner Thorsen said he does have a concern that similar buildings may also want
additional signage if the Commission chooses to support this request. Planner Teague noted
that the purpose of the requested sign variance is advertising; not way finding.
which could be an issue.
Commissioner Nemerov commented that in his opinion similar buildings should have the same
value and should be treated the same with regard to signage. He added he doesn't believe it's
unreasonable for a corporation/company to want to "broadcast" their business to the general
public. Nemerov further stated that the City of Edina should want businesses to do well.
Commissioner Hobbs said that while he understands the applicant's point of view in wanting
additional signage he pointed out the ordinance is clear; no street frontage; not sigh.
Continuing, Hobbs suggested that the Commission should take another look at the sign code
and amend it if needed.
Commissioner Lee commented that personally she finds identifying logos helpful because it
provides awareness; however, agrees with Commissioner Hobbs that the ordinance doesn't
permit this type of signage.
Motion
Commissioner Thorsen moved to recommend denial of the requested variance
based on staff findings:
• The proposed variance is not reasonable since the proposed wall sign can be
installed without a variance on the west elevation of the building fronting
Ohms Lane.
• The proposed sign would set an undesirable precedence for other similarly
located buildings in the neighborhood lacking street frontage on Highway
100.
Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss,
Olsen. Nays; Nemerov, Platteter. Motion to deny carried 5-2.
Page 3 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Add Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning to the R -I Single
Dwelling Unit District Designation. Oskam House. 6901 Dakota Trail,
Edina, MN
Planner Presentation
Planner Repya informed the Commission Mrs. Marri Oskam, 6901 Dakota,Trail, is requesting
to add her house and property to the Edina Heritage landmark Overlay Zoning Designation.
The Heritage Preservation Board recommended that the Commission support this request.
Repya reported the subject property is located on the east side of the 6900 block of
Dakota Trail in the Indian Hills neighborhood. The existing single family home, an
International style constructed in 1963, is situated on the west bank of Indianhead Lake,
and has a 2 -car detached garage in front of the residence; connected by a roof -covered
deck. This Contemporary home was designed by renowned, female architect, Elizabeth
Close; who with her husband started the architectural firm of Close & Close in 1939.
Repya explained the subject house is one of the first homes built on Indianhead Lake; the
natural terrain remained untouched as the home nestled into the sloping hillside. There have
been no additions to the homes since it was constructed, however it has been meticulously
maintained, and is as shining an example of Mid -Century Contemporary architecture today as it
was when constructed in 1963. Fearing her home could be subject to a future tear -down, Mrs.
Oskam approached the Heritage Preservation Board to determine whether her home could be
a candidate for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) which would provide
protection from demolition
Continuing, Repya noted upon the direction of the. Heritage Preservation Board (HPB),
Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel conducted an evaluation of the Oskam property and
provided the HPB with a "Determination of Eligibility" concluding that, "The Oskam House is
historically significant in the area of architecture under Criterion "C" of the City Code (Sec. 36-
714. (1) c. with the following eligibility criteria :Embodiment of the distinctive characteristics
of an architectural style, design, period, type or method of construction; or that possess
high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction, or Important archeological data or the
potential to yield important archeological data.
Repya said in addition to being a noteworthy example of Modern residential architecture, the
house is one of a relatively small number of post war residences in Edina designed by a female
architect. Elizabeth ("Lisle") Scheu Close (1912-2011) was one of the first women to graduate
from the architecture school at the University of Minnesota. In partnership with her husband,
architect Winston A. Close (1906-1997), she designed many modernist homes and other
buildings and was an influential force in regional architecture. Her work is demonstrably
important in women's history and architectural history."
Page 4 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
On September 9, 2014, the HPB voted to add 6901 Dakota Trail to the list of Edina properties
eligible for Edina Heritage Landmark Designation, and instructed Consultant Vogel to prepare a
nomination study identifying the significance of the home. Mr. Vogel and Planner Repya also
worked with Mrs. Oskam to create a plan of treatment that would provide protection for the
home she was seeking, as well as clear direction to future owners.
Continuing, Planner Repya delivered a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the house and
property. Repya concluded asking the Commission to provide support for the Heritage Preservation
Board's recommendation to add the Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning designation to the R-
I Single Dwelling Unit District for 6901 Dakota Trail.
Appearing for the Applicant
Mrs. Marri Oskam, property owner.
Discussion/Questions
Commissioner Nemerov commented that in his opinion the house is very interesting; however,
he questioned if the Commission supports the requested designation if something "goes
wrong" with the house (leaking roof) would the City be required to repainit. Planner Repya
responded the City bares no responsibility,
Chair Platteter asked if the property is designated and the house slips into disrepair what
happens. Planner Repya responded disrepair is a possibility with any property; and would be
addressed accordingly. Repya further explained the Heritage Preservation Board encourages
maintenance of our locally designated properties, adding to date the City has had no issues with
any of the designated properties. Repya said she expects the same with this property. Platteter
said he drove by the home and found it blended well in the environment and was a beautiful
property on the lake.
Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Repya who requests Heritage Landmark Designation.
Planner Repya responded in this instance the property owner requested the designation;
however, the Heritage Preservation Board has identified properties as preservation worthy but
to date the City has received no requests for designation.
Chair Platteter asked Planner Repya if the City received any response from residents regarding
the Morningside Bungalow study. Repya responded the Heritage Preservation Board did an
extensive study on Morningside Bungalows; inviting property owners to learn about their
properties and the possibility of landmark designation; however to date the City hasn't received
any input from those owners.
Commissioner Hobbs personally thanked Mrs. Oskam and family for their meticulous care of
the property. He added it's just beautiful. Chair Platteter and Commissioners agreed with
Hobbs and also thanked Planner Repya for her presentation.
Page 5 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
Motion
Commissioner Thorsen moved to support the designation of 6109 Dakota Trail as
a Heritage Landmark. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. All voted aye;
motion carried.
C. Sketch Plan — Bank of America. 6868 France Avenue, Edina, MN.
Planner Presentation
Planner Teague explained to new Commission Members that the sketch plan review process is
a process that provides the applicant an opportunity to come before the Commission to gather
feedback on a future project. Teague explained all Commission comments during the sketch
plan process are non-binding, however, are informative for the applicant ag they proceed with
the formal application.
Continuing, Teague reported the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal
to tear down the existing 3,098 square -foot Think Bank, and construct a new LEED Certified,
7,190 square foot Bank of American with a drive -up ATM at 6868 France Avenue. Merrill
Lunch would also be a tenant in the building. Teague said each use would have a separate
entrance/exit into the building.
Teague said the site is zoned POD -2, Planned Office District; therefore, the proposed uses are
permitted. Teague asked the Commission to note the proposed building will be located on the
existing 21.8 -acre parcel that houses an eight story building and the attached Tavern on France.
Being part of that the site the parking and access would be shared with existing uses. The
proposal also includes storm water ponding areas that are uncommon along France Avenue.
Teague said staff would recommend in this situation if the ponding areas are developed the
ponds are also turned into an amenity such as a water feature with a fountain.
Teague noted the following would be required for a formal application:
• Site Plan Review
• Front Setback Variance from 35 -feet to 22 -feet for the building.
• Front Yard Setback from 35 -feet to 20 -feet for the ATM drive through.
• Variance to allow an ATM drive through to be located on a side of a building that faces
property zoned R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District.
Appearing for the Applicant
Anita Thomas and Aaron Greene
Page 6 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
Teague introduced to the Commission the development team for the project, Anita Thomas
and Aaron Green.
Discussion
Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague if the applicant received the guiding principles from the
France Southdale Working Group. Teague responded the guiding principles were not
completed at the time of sketch plan application; however, the applicant would be provided the
principles for formal application.
Commissioner Olsen asked Planner Teague if there is a "cap" on the number of buildings that
can be on a building site. Teague responded that lot coverage limits the number of structures
on a tract.
Chair Platteter asked Planner Teague what the applicant is actually requesting. Teague
responded when formal application is made the applicant will be requesting site plan approval
with variances.
Applicant Presentation
Ms. Thomas informed Commissioners the development team met with the neighborhood and
informed them they intend to buffer the residential neighborhood throughlandscapingand
other measures. Thomas said all lighting would be LED on lower light standards, adding they
will be very respectful of the residential component of the area.
Continuing, Thomas explained the project will be a flagship financial center for Bank of America.
She added the building will be divided between two tenants, Bank of America and Merrill Lynch.
Each tenant would have their own entrance and exit from the building. The structure would
also be LEED certified.
v
With graphics the development team noted the project includes the demolition of the existing
building and construction of a 7,190 square foot building with remote drive -up ATM. The
development would include new sidewalks, parking spaces, utilities and a storm water
management system that includes both surface retention ponds and an underground storm
water storage system. Greene noted the remote drive -up ATM would be constructed within
an existing parking field. Thomas asked the Commission to further note that their goal is to
keep as many trees as possible along the perimeter of the property. Concluding, Thomas asked
the Commission for their future support for the project including approval�of the variances
when formal application is made.
Discussion
Commissioner Thorsen asked the applicant how the residents responded to the plan. Ms.
Thomas said for the most part it was rather positive, adding they stressed to the neighborhood
their willingness to do everything possible to buffer the building.
Page 7 of 9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
Commissioner Olsen said in reviewing the sketch plans she had some questions on if they
intend to tie the sidewalk proposed along West 691h Street to the sidewalk on France Avenue
and if they propose a sidewalk along Valley View Road. Ms. Thomas responded the sidewalk
(69`' St) will tie into the sidewalk along France Avenue; however, at this time there is no plan to
extend the sidewalk along Valley View Road. Ms. Thomas said they want to retain as many of
the existing trees as possible. Mr. Greene also asked Commissioners to note that the grade
changes a bit as the corner is turned along Valley View Road.
Commissioner Hobbs commented that he views the proposed rain gardens positively; however,
encouraged planting more trees and proper grasses. Ms. Thomas responded they also felt the
proposed rain gardens was positive, adding they will be working with an araorist on plantings
and tree type. Thomas said a LEED certification also has specific landscaping requirements that
need to be met.
Commissioners further questioned the applicants on the need and justification for the two
requested variances; further suggested shifting the building and ATM drive through.
Mr. Green reported with regard to the setback variance for the building the corner of the
building "gets clipped" for setback purposes due to the curve of the street.9 Commissioner
Olsen further noted she finds no justification for the variances and was disappointed in the way
the proposed building addresses France Avenue. Chair Platteter agreed.
A discussion ensued on the proposed building, it's location, the location of the ATM, and how
the building interacts with France Avenue and the newly formed principles for the France
Southdale area. The following was noted and suggested:
• Consider adding crosswalk to gain access to the other side of 69th Street West/Valley
View Road.
• Reconfigure both the drive-through and building. Consider "flipping the building",
shifting the building. Better presence on France Avenue.
• The two rain gardens are "unique" water features in this area and close to the street.
Consider creating fountains or some other feature to add interest/movement to the
rain gardens.
• Add more landscaping elements to the site including the interior parking lot area.
• Engage the street. Consider ways to make this site better than the previous site.
• Consider adding a "store front" on France Avenue. The Planning Commission has
consistently supported new structures that "address" the street.
• Consider multiple entrances.
• Add more glass to the site; maybe through window placement.
• Consider this tract in its entirety; not only this specific area of the tract.
• Remove existing transformer.
• Suggest four sided architecture; don't want a "back of building" look.
• Suggest redesigning the building by implementing the guiding principles for the France
Southdale area.
Page 8of9
Planning Commission Minutes
July 8, 2015
In response to the comments/suggestions from Commissioners Ms. Thomas and Mr. Green
noted the following that in their opinion would create difficulty in addressing some of the
suggestions:
• Although there appears flexibility in building and ATM placement they are required to
maintain "lease lines" and building within the confines of the allotted lease lines.
• Because of the private nature and use as a bank and financial operation limited access is
needed for safety. There needs to be a so called "back of building"+to accommodate
interior banking and financial needs. Multiple entrances would hinder safety and because
of the location of the parking spaces there really isn't the opportunity to be flexible with
entrance placement. People would not want to walk around the building to gain access
to the site and lighting safety is needed for "walkups".
• Will review guiding principles established by the France Southdale Working Group for
the formal application and will do everything possible to meet the principles where they
can be met.
Chair Platteter thanked the applicants for their presentation, adding the Commission looks
forward to formal application.
VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials.
IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner Olsen reported the France Southdale Work Group is scheduled to meet again
and will focus on Stage 2 of the process.
Chair Platteter asked the Commission to keep in the back of their mind the 2016 Work Plan,
adding we need to finalize it prior to submitting to the City Council.
X. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Thorsen moved meeting adjournment at 9:10 p.m. Commissioner
Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to adjourn carried.
11-1�spectfully Submitte
Page 9of9