Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-04-09 Planning Commission Meeting Packets
REGU I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL 1U AGENDA MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 9, 2014 7:00 PM APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the 'regular meeting of the Edina Planning Commission March 12, 2014 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals) must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Comprehensive Pl�n Amendments, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC. 6725 York Avenue, 6628, 6700, 6704, 6709 & 6712 Xerxes Avenue, Edina, MN B. Site Plan and Variances. Border Foods (Taco Bell). 3210 Southdale Circle, Edina, MN. C. Preliminary Rezoning & Variances. Mathias Mortenson. 3923 West 49th Street, Edina, MN VII. ANNUAL MEETING —(ELECTION OF OFFICERS & ADOPTION OF BYLAWS VIII. CORRESPONDENCE Attendance Council Update IX. CHAIR AND COMM X. STAFF COMMENTS XI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all resides the way of hearing amplification, 886172 hours in advance of the n D PETITIONS COMMENTS to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in P interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 -927 - ?ting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission April 23. 2014. o e PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague April 9, 2014 VI.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Lennar Corporation is proposing to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue. (See pro 3erty location on pages Al—A4a.) The applicant would then build a six -story, 24 unit upscale apartment building with 12,500 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot is proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue, with underground parking for residents provided under the apartments. Surface spa�es would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident guests. (See narrative and plans on pages A5—A27, and larger scale plans in the attached development book.) To accommodate the request, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are requested: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 70 feet. ➢ Floor Area Ratio - i from 1.0 to 1.27. ➢ Re -guiding the LaI d Use Plan for the five single-family homes from Low Density Residential to Community Activity Center. In addition, the following land use applications are requested: ➢ Preliminary Rezoning from PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and R- 1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and ➢ Preliminary Development Plan. This "preliminary" review'lis the first step of a two-step process of City review. Should these "preliminar " requests be approved by the City Council; the second step would be Final Rezoning to PUD and Final Site Plan review which would again require review by Loth the Planning Commission and City Council. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See the sketch plans on pages A45—A49; and the minutes from those meetings on pages A50—A54.) The applicant has developed the proposed plans by attempting to address the issues raised by the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan. Some of the most significant changes include: ➢ Reduction in the number of units from 273 to 242. (52 units per acre from 59.) Reducing floor area ratio from 1.55 to 1.27. ➢ Eliminating the loading dock and driveway entrance to Xerxes which would have brought traffic through Richfield. ➢ Creating podium height along Xerxes to lessen the impact of a tall building facing properties in Richfield. ➢ Moving the building 12 feet to the west to reduce the impact on Xerxes Avenue. ➢ Creating better pedestrian connections in, through and around the site. There are five pedestrian walkways planned from York Avenue into the site, including two that flow east -west through the site into Richfield. ➢ Providing sustainable and "green" features. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Automotive Repair & McDonalds; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Easterly: Single -Family Homes in the City of Richfield; these homes are zoned Single -Family Residential, but the Richfield Comprehensive Plan guides them for medium density, 7-12 units per acre, (See pages A55—A56.) Southerly: Shopping center including the Edina Liquor Store and Cub Foods; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Westerly: Southdale; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and guided Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 4.61 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a retail building with surrounding surface parking and five single family homes on the east side. (See pages Al—A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC — Community Activity Center and LDR, Low Density Residential. (See page A4.) 2 Zoning: Site Circulation Access to the site wo has been eliminated. (See page A15.) WSE recommends a left tui A44a of the traffic stu for approval of this ac Access into the two -I would be from the nc entrance/exit would I entrance/exit on the and A18.) PCD -3, Planned Commercial District & R-1, Single -Dwelling Unit District (See page A4a.) Id be from York Avenue only. The curb cut to Xerxes 3oth access points would be right -in and right -out only. and Associates conducted a traffic study and i in to the site off York Avenue. (See page A40 and y.) The city would have to work with Hennepin Country el underground parking garage for the residential units i and south side of the building. The north to/from the lower level of the garage; and the uth side would be to the main level. (See pages A15 Extensive pedestrian Daths are planned for the site. A new north/south sidewalk, separated from the street, would be created along York Avenue; and a new north/soutl,i sidewalk, separated from the street would be built along Xerxes. (See page A15.) There would be five sidewalk connections into the site from the York Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed new building, and two that would extend all the way through the site to connect to the Xerxes sidewalk. This would provide Richfield residents a pedestrian connection to the Socithdale area. Traffic & Parking Study WSB and Associates study on pages A28 - development could b, would be adequate p mentioned above, the York. (See page A40 Landscaping Based on the perimel story trees and a full proposing 66 over stc would include a mixti and Spruce. (See pad complement of under Final Landscaping we ;onducted a parking and traffic study. (See the attached A4e.) The Study concludes that the proposed supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there rking provided. (See pages A39 -A40 of the study.) As traffic study recommends a left turn in to the site off ind A44a of the traffic study.) of the site, the applicant is required to have 48 over mplement of under story shrubs. The applicant is trees, including existing and proposed. The trees of Maple, Lindens, Spruce, Elm, Birch Honey Locust s A25-A25a, and theelopment plan book.) A full ory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Id be more closely reviewed with the Final Site Plan. 3 Concern has been raised by Hennepin County in regard to boulevard trees. (See pages A59—A67.) Staff and the applicant would have to work with Hennepin County to revise plantings within the right-of-way.) Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading for the retail space would take place in the front of the building or at the south side. Trash would be collected within the building and the garbage truck would pick up on the south side. (See page Al 8.) The move in/trash and recycling area for the apartments would take place at the south side of the building as well. (See page Al 8.) Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be generally acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A58. Highlighted items include: a requirement for a developer's agreement for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other public improvements; connecting the water main to the Edina water distribution system, rather than both Edina and Richfield distribution systems; providing details on the infiltration system; and SAC and WAC fees will be required. Any approvals should be conditioned on the conditions outline in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014. Building/Building Material The building would be constructed of high quality brick, architectural cast stone, stucco, fiber cement board and metal panels. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. (See rendering on pages A8 A14.) A materials board would be presented at the Final Site Plan phase. Signage The underlying zoning of the property would be PCD -3, therefore, would be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. Staff would recommend a full signage plan be submitted as part of the Final Development Plan. Plans should specifically include location and size of pylon signs and way finding signage. Specific signage regulations would be incorporated into the PUD Zoning District including way finding signage. Setback from Single Family Homes Within the underlying PCD -3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings six stories tall be required to be setback twice the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. If the homes on the east side of Xerxes were in the City of Edina a 140 -foot setback would be 0 required from the six - building would be set guides those homes so the long term plan single-family homes. A56.) Shadow Study The applicant comple, the building might hay demonstrated, the big 3-5pm in the winter m homes in Richfield. tory portion of the building. The six -story portion of the ack 122 feet. The Richfield Comprehensive Plan it medium density development at 7-12 units per acre, or that area is to be more densely developed, and not gee Richfield Comprehensive Plan on pages A55— �d a shadow study to determine impacts the height of on the surrounding area. (See pages A26—A27.) As est impact would only be for a few hours roughly from nths when shadows would be cast over the residential Comprehensive Guide flan/Density To accommodate the are requested: ➢ Floor Area R,, ➢ Building Heig ➢ Re -guiding th Low Density I Floor Area Ratio. Th high end of the end o development as indic the CAC, Community density range; rather uest, three amendments to the Comprehensive Plan —from 1.0 to 1.27. — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 75 feet. Land Use Plan for the five single-family homes from :sidential to Community Activity Center. proposed density of 52 units per acre would be on the the density range for the City's high density residential ted in the table below. The site is however, located in %ctivity Center, which does not have an established ie density maximum is based on floor area ratio. Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 6500 France (Senior Housing) 6500 France 179 76 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Edina Place Apartments 7300-50 York 139 15 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 69th & York Apartments 3121 69th Street 114 30 The applicant has attempted to address the density concern that was raised at the Sketch Plan review by reducing the number of units from 273 to 242; and reducing the floor area ratio from 1.55 to 1.27. As requested by the City Council, during the review of the 6500 France Avenue Senior housing, the following is a list of suburban examples of high density regulation and development in cities adjacent to Edina: St. Louis Park. St. Louis Park allows densities within a PUD to be up to 75 units per acre in high density and mixed-use districts. Additionally, for PUD's in an office district, if there is a housing component as part of a mixed-use PUD, the City may remove the upper limit on residential density on a case-by-case basis. This happened recently within The West End Redevelopment project. "The Flats at the West End" has a density. of 111 units per acre. It is 119 units on a 1.07 acre site. Minnetonka. Minnetonka does not have a density cap within their Comprehensive Plan. They define high density residential as anything over 12 units per acre. Developments are then considered on a case by case basis. Factors that go in to the consideration include: environmental impacts/conditions such as wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes and trees; type of housing; provision of affordable housing; traffic impact; site plan; and surrounding area. Minnetonka does not have an example project similar to the one proposed here. Minnetonka is primarily made up of large lots, with mature trees wetlands and open space. However, their Comprehensive Plan does allow consideration of dense development. Bloomington. The City of Bloomington allows up to 50 units per acre in general; however, in areas that are designated as "High Intensity Mixed Use with Residential" (HX -R District) an FAR minimum 1.5 with a max of 2.0) is required. The density may be increased if the following is provided: Below grade parking; provision of a plaza or park; affordable housing; sustainable design principles; provision of public art. With the exception of the park/plaza; the applicant is proposing all of the other items. Bloomington has had three recent projects that have exceeded a 2.0 FAR: The Reflections condominiums along 34th Ave (95 units per acre); Summer House senior apartments at 98th and Lyndale (59 units per acre); and Genesee apartments at Penn and American Boulevard. (73 units per acre) G Given these examples of cities, the proposed densi location in a commercial < service. igh density residential development in our surrounding (would seem reasonable for this site, given its ea, with convenient access to Metro Transit bus Based on the above inforI ation, the following is the suggested Comprehensive Plan Amendment langua e, as recommended by staff. The text highlighted in red would be added to the existing text. Staff is further suggesting flexibility in regard to density for housing in the CAC District. Nonresidential and Mixed Use Categories Description, and Uses Development Guidelines Density Guidelines CAC The most intense district Form -based design Floor to Area Ratio -Per Community Activity in terms of uses, height standards for building current Zoning Code: Center and coverage. placement, massing and maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Example: Greater Primary uses: (Retail, street -level treatment. Floor to Area Ratio may Southdale area (not office, lodging, Buildings should be placed exceed 1.0 on a case by case including large multi- entertainment and in appropriate proximity to basis, subject to proximity to family residential residential uses, streets to create pedestrian utilities capacity, level of neighborhoods such combined or in separate scale. Buildings "step transit service available, and as Centennial Lakes) buildings. down" at boundaries with impact on adjacent roads. Secondary us s: lower -density districts and Other desired items to allow Institutional, recreational upper stories "step back" greater density would uses. from street. include: Below grade Mixed use sh uld be More stringent design parking, provision of park or open space, affordable encouraged, and may be standards for buildings > 5 stories. housing, sustainable design required on l rger sites. principles, provision of public Emphasize pedestrian art, pedestrian circulation, circulation; re -introduce and podium height. finer -grained circulation patterns where feasible. Using the above ame could be made to sup process. As noted above in the "C recognizes the Southdali of uses, height and cove other parts of the City, st of the proposed use, whi the area. Land Use. Within the Ci are surrounded by comrr (See page A_.) The only is because of the existin( surrounding area within 1 Edina typically do not ha I text as a basis for review of the subject project, a case the proposed high density through the PUD Zoning ascription, Land Uses," the Comprehensive Plan area and the CAC as the most intense district in terms age. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in ch as 50th France; therefore, the floor area ratio of 1.27 ;h is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for f of Edina, the existing single family homes on this site !rcial area that is guided as Community Activity Center. E)ason these are now guided for low density residential use. They are not uses compatible within the e City of Edina. The uses along Xerxes in the City of a roadway access onto Xerxes. The proposed 7 development is consistent with that, as the driveways to the existing single family homes would all be eliminated, and no new access would be created. The proposed land use is consistent with the uses allowed in the CAC. Within the City of Richfield, the existing single-family homes are guided in the Richfield Comprehensive Plan for medium density at 7-12 units per acre. Therefore, Richfield's long term vision for this area also includes higher densities. (See pages A55—A56.) Staff therefore, would recommend that these homes be amended to be guided as CAC, Community Activity Center similar to the surrounding property. The map on page 9 of this staff report shows how the Comprehensive Plan would be amended. Height. At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and City Council expressed some concern in regard to six stories on the site, especially on the Richfield and Xerxes Avenue side of the site. Podium height was recommended to minimize the height. The applicant has both included a two-story podium on Xerxes, and has moved the building 12 feet back from the road. The setback proposed at Sketch Plan was 25 feet; the proposed setback is now 37 feet. The 3-6 story set back is proposed at 52 feet. Podium height is also being proposed on the York Avenue side, by bringing the retail portion of the building closer to the street and stepping back the height into the site. Given podium height is proposed on both sides of the building staff would support the Comprehensive Plan amendment in for height in this situation. The map on the following page shows how the Comprehensive Plan would be amended. Legend IDR- Lew Density Residential 0q. Office Residential - RM-RegiarelMedcal WAR -Low Density Attached Residential 011 Ottice - OSP- Open Spate and Padre Mai- Medium Density Residential M�C-Mbadll58 Center PSP-PubliciserNPuMlc ® FDR- High Dan* Residential C41C- CommunNActivty Center IAH- UmitedAccess Figtrway - NC • Neighbomgod commercial - 1- Industrial 2 f 4 2 12 3-5 i 4 7.. I �2 ett• � fes_ Height Limits 2 Stories: 24' 3 Stories: 36' 4 St ' 48' ■8 3-5 3-5 65th at ortes. 4 E 5 Stories: 60' 8 Stories: 962 2 9 Stories: 108' W' 10 Stories: 120' 4 4 �I 12 Stories: 144' 2 e,.2 Standard Height HI' 9 aaC s. s Podium Height 4 R g o F.... _ M 1 ]12 4 OR t2 g 2 z ryth 5t OR- -4W ` +iewe..t. or 12 torn ric} n Future Land Use Plan with ON1.0-4 BuildingHeights City of Edina Southeast Quadrant 2008 Comprehen ive Plan Update 9ure4.613 Data Source: URS 0 0.5 Miles * Height may be increased'I to six stories if podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. 0 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Section 36-253 of the Edina City Code provides the following regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; 10 h. encourac housing; a variety of housing types including affordable 7d i. ensure- the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal woul meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria =ld be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Communi y Activity Center — CAC," which is described as the most intense district in terms of uses, height and coverage. Primary uses include retail and r sidential. Mixed uses are encouraged. The proposal woul and retail. The site pedestrian paths a separated from the new north/south si Xerxes. (See pagE the site from the Y new building, and connect to the Xer pedestrian connec As recommended Commission and height would be u family homes in R Xerxes, with four ; All Al2.) I be a mixture of use within the building with residential would be very pedestrian friendly with extensive -e planned for the site. A new north/south sidewalk, street, would be created along York Avenue; and a lewalk, separated from the street would be built along A15.) There would be five sidewalk connections into >rk Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed wo that would extend all the way through the site to ;es sidewalk. These sidewalks would provide .ions into the Southdale area for residents of Richfield. n the Comprehensive Plan, and by the Planning ity Council as part of the Sketch Plan review, podium lized on Xerxes Avenue to lessen impact to the single- ;hfield. There would be two-story apartments close to dditional stories stepped back into the site. (See pages The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See page A7.) The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. (See pages A10—Al2.) Pi, a. Uses. contain 850 of tl within a the site zoned R permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, �al uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit tl in the various zoning districts defined in Section s Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses UD district, provided they would be allowable on �nder the Comprehensive Plan. Property currently 1. R-2 and PRD -1 shall not be eligible for a PUD. 11 The proposed uses, retail and multiple -family residential housing are uses allowed in the Community Activity Center, as described in the Comprehensive Plan, and within the underlying PCD -3 Zoning District. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC,,, which encourages the mixing of retail and multi -family residential uses. The proposed plans are therefore, consistent with the land uses in Comprehensive Plan. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; Again, the proposal is for a mixture of land uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As indicated in table earlier within this report, and the fact that the site is located in a commercial area on York Avenue, near Southdale, Metro Transit and an arterial roadway, the proposed density and FAR of 1.27 is appropriate for this site. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the underlying PCD -3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height of the building and 12 number of 1 Please not( convention, purpose an arking stalls would become the standards for the lots. that a few City Standards are not met under I zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the I intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout encourages pedestrian movement; would utilize podium height on both Xerxes and York, bringing two stories up to the street on Xerxes, and stepping back the mass of the building on York. The project would provide mixed use on one site. The design !of the building is of a high quality. Proposed materials include higquality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass. "Edina" lim�stone is also proposed at the street level The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space within the development. The applicant is not specifically proposing to provide affordable housing at this time. However, based on discussions at recent work sessions with the City Council and the Edina Housing Foundation, regarding the importance of affordable housing and meeting the City's goal to add more units of affordable housing (See pages A68—A69); staff would recommend 10% of the units be designated for. affordable housing. The detail of how that might work would be greater defined at the time of any final rezoning of the property. Affordable housing is also a stated goal, as mentioned above in the PUD criteria. 13 Compliance Table * Variance would be required under PCD -3 Zoning PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding Land Use, Height, and Density reasonable to allow the proposed development? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. Within the City of Edina, the single family homes are surrounded by area that is guided as Community Activity Center. (See page A4.) The only reason these are now guided for low density residential is because of the existing use. They are not uses compatible within the surrounding area within the City of Edina. The uses along Xerxes in the City of Edina typically do not have roadway access onto Xerxes. The proposed development is consistent with that, as the driveways to the existing single 14 City Standard (PCD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — York Avenue 70 feet 122 feet Front — Xerxes Avenue (Stories 1 & 2) 35 feet 36 feet (Stories 3 — 6) 70 feet 52 feet* Side — North 70 feet 36 feet* Rear — South 70 feet 37 feet* Building Height Four stories and Six Stories & 48 feet 70 feet* Maximum Floor Area 1.0% 1.27%* Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls 77 — retail 134 spaces exterior (retail & guest parking) 242 enclosed 245 regular stalls (residential) 38 tandem stalls Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance would be required under PCD -3 Zoning PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Are the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments regarding Land Use, Height, and Density reasonable to allow the proposed development? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment is reasonable for the site for the following reasons: The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. Within the City of Edina, the single family homes are surrounded by area that is guided as Community Activity Center. (See page A4.) The only reason these are now guided for low density residential is because of the existing use. They are not uses compatible within the surrounding area within the City of Edina. The uses along Xerxes in the City of Edina typically do not have roadway access onto Xerxes. The proposed development is consistent with that, as the driveways to the existing single 14 family homes would The proposed land L City of Richfield has Xerxes as medium d Edina and Richfield 2. Given the podium h height is reasonabl( City Council expres especially on the Ri height was recomm included a two-stor) back from the road. proposed setback is proposed setback c York Avenue side, I street and stepping II be eliminated, and no new access would be created. e is consistent with the uses allowed in the CAC. The uided the single family homes on the east side of nsity residential; therefore, the long term vision of both this area is for higher densities. ight proposed on both Xerxes and York, the proposed At Sketch Plan review, the Planning Commission and ed some concern in regard to six stories on the site, hfield and Xerxes Avenue side of the site. Podium nded to minimize the height. The applicant has both podium on Xerxes, and has moved the building 12 feet Fhe setback proposed at Sketch Plan. was 25 feet; the now 37 feet. The 3-6 story portion of the building has a 52 feet. Podium height is also being proposed on the ✓ bringing the retail portion of the building closer to the )ack the height into the site. 3. The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense disrict in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City or allows a floarea r�tio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, t e floor area ratio of the proposed use, which is predominantly residential, seems appropriate for the area. The applicant has attempted to address the density concern that was raised at the Sketch Plan review by redu ing the number of units from 273 to 242; and reducing the floor area ratio from 1.55 to 1.27. 4. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. 1 • Is the PUD Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the PUD is appropriate for the site for the following reasons: As highlighted abovI on pages 10-13, the proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In ummary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide a b. Create a pedes paths planned 1 the street, woul sidewalk, sepal page A15.) ThE of use within the building with residential and retail. an friendly development with extensive pedestrian the site. A new north/south sidewalk, separated from be created along York Avenue; and a new north/south :ed from the street would be built along Xerxes. (See would be five sidewalk connections into the site from 15 the York Sidewalk; three into the retail space and proposed new building, and two that would extend all the way through the site to connect to the Xerxes sidewalk. These sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections into the Southdale area for residents of Richfield. c. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. d. The applicant is also proposing some sustainability principles within their project narrative. (See page A7.) The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. (See pages A10--Al2.) e. Ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 2. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 3. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. (See traffic study on pages A2$ A44e.) 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement Patterns. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • A Pedestrian -Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. 16 Increase pedeE between neigh) transportation i -ian and bicycling opportunities and connections )rhoods, and with other communities, to improve :rastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of desigln, construction, renovation and long-term operation of new and existing development. h. Buildings shoulc be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. Staff Recommendation Plan Amendments Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: ➢ Building Height — from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 70 feet. ➢ Floor Area Ratio - 1.0 to 1.27. ➢ Re -guiding the La d Use Plan for the six single-family homes from Low Density Residenti I to Community Activity Center. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed land uses are consistent with existing and proposed land uses in this area. -* City of Richfield has guided the single family homes on the east side of X1 erxes as medium density residential; therefore, the long term vision of both dina and Richfield in this area is for higher densities. 2. Podium height is pre posed on both Xerxes and York as recommended in the Comprehensiv& Plan. The six story portion of the building is stepped back into the site to minimize impact on adjacent property. 3 The ComprehensivPlan recognizes the Southdale area and the CAC as the most intense di trict in terms of uses, height and coverage. The City allows a floor area ratio of up to 1.5 in other parts of the City, such as 50th France; therefore, toe floor area ratio of the proposed use at 1.27, which is predominantly residential, is appropriate for the area. 17 4. The traffic and parking study done by WSB concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed project, and there would be adequate parking provided. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD - 3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development District and Preliminary Development Plan to tear down the existing retail building at 6725 York Avenue, and single family homes at 6712, 6708, 6704, 6700 and 6628 Xerxes Avenue and build a six -story, 242 unit upscale apartment building with 12,500 square feet of retail on the first level. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Community Activity Center — CAC," which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project would create a pedestrian friendly development with extensive pedestrian paths planned for the site. Sidewalks would provide pedestrian connections for residents in the City of Richfield to Southdale. 3. Podium Height would be used on both York and Xerxes. 4. Sustainable design principles would be utilized. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass building. "Edina" limestone is proposed at the street level. 5. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 6. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the CAC, Community Activity Center which encourages mixing land uses, including retail and multiple family residential, on one site. 7. The existing roadways would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads subject to conditions. 18 8. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Pion: a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. b. Movement PattE ms. ■ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent ne ghborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ■ A Pedestria -Friendly Environment. c. Encourage infi0redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. d. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the city, and the larger region. e. Increase mixed se development where supported by adequate .infrastructure torinimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the taxlbase. f. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. g. Incorporate principles of sustainability and energy conservation into all aspects of desi n, construction, renovation and long-term operation of .new and existin development. h. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scab. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower - density districts*d upper stories "step back" from street. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 04, 3 The Final Developent Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Develo ment Plans dated March 3 & 25, 2014. The Final Landscap� Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per S ction 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. The Final Lighting Flan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 f the Zoning Ordinance. 19 4. Submittal of a complete sign plan for the site as part of the Final Development Plan application. Signage should include monument sign locations and size, way finding signage, and wall signage. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated April 2, 2014. 6. At the time of building permit application, compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the chief building official's memo dated March 27, 2014. 7. Work with staff and Hennepin County to secure a left turn in lane from south bound York Avenue. 8. Ten percent (10%) of the housing units shall be designated for affordable housing. Specific detail would be determined at the time of Final approval. 9. Sustainable design principles must be used. Greater detail shall be provided with the Final Rezoning submittal. 10. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. Deadline for a city decision: July 1, 2014 20 r1 w 0 Property Map u a 0 41 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A TiIiink Green! i Parcel 29-028-24-31-0003 Ali ID: Owner Nha Birmingham Llc Et Al I Name: Parcel 6725 York Ave S Address: Edina, MN 55435 Property Commercial -Preferred Type: Home- Non -Homestead stead: Parcel 3.33 acres Area: 145,096 sq ft Property Map u a 0 41 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 A TiIiink Green! II1.,6-,7,25--Y.o.r-k,.A.v,.e,n--u-e,,--E.,d,.,ina .. __.___...-___.__. ;0 Find a PID or an address on the map _._. Welcome Results PID: 29028243°10003 6725 York Ave S Edina, MN 55435 Owner/Taxpayer Nha Birmingham Llc Owner: Et AI Taxpayer: School Dist: 280 Sewer Dist: Watershed Dist: 1 Parcel Parcel Area: 3.33 acres 145,096 sq ft Legend Measure ®� OUR d�teef� rlE �=a..g _xs'-+.nom., _ y. i'.• �" ,%.. � '� �mi�ef �,`�� �i:: u � � � � � 'it3Y� Ri'v'fv�'. � ��� , , max" 4 VA Oil 5 axa "d cul" k .-+ ems t _ w. x• Y 4 Y. - r IrN' 1 1 1 i fam y�ON, mat m0ivaft,mm IMM JOU JUS INK OM =O ...Y 17 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business 2008 Comprehensive Plan ka9"int Figure 4.3 City of Edina Future Land Use Plan y..<.•s" 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source: URS F-L-F-Ljn ® 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4. Land Use and Community Design 4-25 ,VL WILSON RD & EDEN AVE DETAIL GRANDVIEW DETAIL CAHILL RD & 70TH DETAIL 50TH & FRANCE DETAIL Zoning Map - 44TH&FRANCE DETAIL City of Edina Hennepin County, Minnesota •tYEYAII° o cEYan eases -^ 54TH 8 FRANCE DETAIL Fit nim_ C NTCR LETR ` Legend oM Q.ro �u..mv.uc or W�E 70TH & FRANCE DETAIL SOUTHDALE DETAIL g.PpLicN R�R6TivE LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 LENNAR' PROJECT NARRATIVE 6725 YORK AVENUE SOUTH, EDINA, MN 55435 Monday, March 3rd, 2014 Team DEVELOPER: LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES, LLC "(LMC) Lennar Corporation (NYSE: LEN) is a Miami -based homebuilder founded in 1954, with a market capitalization of over $8.6 billion. It has offices in 33 markets and 16 states, and employs approximately 5,750 associates nationwide. In mid -2011, Lennar created Lennar Multifamily Communities, LLC (LMC), a company that specializes in the development, management, construction, and ownership of Class A multifamily communities across the nation. LMC's core vision is to work in top tier cities with top tier architects to create luxury condominium quality rental communities. Since its founding, LMC has attracted an outstanding team of seasoned professionals, has purchased 12 sites and contracted for 16 more. Eleven projects are under construction and the company has plans to start 20 more projects in 2014. LMC's pipeline includes over 16,000 units and $3.9 billion in total development cost. Beyond the numbers, LMC is led by professionals that are passionate about creating vibrant communities that positively impact not only the residents, but also the surrounding communities that we become an integral part of. ARCHITECT: ELNESS SWENSON GRAHAM ARCHITECTS (ESG) Since our founding in 1970, Elness Swenson Graham (ESG) Architects has helped our clients create environments for business, community and leisure. In doing so, we have gained the experience and ability to deliver high quality designs for many building types. But this alone is not enough to achieve our mission. The essence of ESG is more than just architecture and buildings. Throughout our entire time, our commitment to enriching our built environment has remained steadfast. It's a commitment that drives us to go beyond the expected to deliver the superior, the timeless, the memorable and the unique; to create environments that capture the human spirit and uplift our lives. This is what we do best. We strive to combine our clients' needs and stewardship for the environment with our knowledge of buildings, markets and culture to deliver uplifting and forward-looking design solutions. The experience derived from our work allows us to offer each client a great breadth of informed and integrated services. We bring holistic solutions to complex problems. We create truly unique environments that enhance our communities and help our clients successfully pursue their goals in the development and construction industries. ESG is committed to creating communities that are both memorable and practical. We breathe life and vitality into our new urban environments. For generations outside our core cities, our society has created single purpose neighborhoods that isolate us from one another and separate us from our workplaces and shopping marts. In so doing, we have placed incredible strains on our infrastructure and resources. Today we want more. We want to build real communities and promote stewardship for our land. We want to live close to our workplaces and close to others. We want to eat out more, to walk to shops, to sit outside in a pleasant, vibrant, safe environment made up of diverse buildings, diverse people, and great public places. 2014.03.03 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 1 /" LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES Staying ahead of the ma Whether it is on a single sit part of our built environme as our population Contin development change. This back to the city in large nut neighborhoods where the advocating for New Urban prominence. Our portfolio high quality design brings t, Project Purpose and Visio 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 304 1 SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 cet - Residential Communities and Community Planning or a large parcel, multi -family residential development has long been a large t. Housing is a forceful driver of new development and will remain so as long -s to grow. But our lifestyles evolve and our sensibilities toward land -eates new demands for new residential paradigms. Many people are moving bers. They wish to live in walkable communities. They now seek vital, 2:4_ hour can find the amenities and conveniences of a more urban lifestyle. By )rinciples, our Residential Studio has propelled ESG to regional and national )f completed work illustrates these principles and highlights the value that reshaping our neighborhoods and cities. The purpose and vision forthismultifamily development in Edina is to create a high-ena luxury rental community with complimentary retail. This complimentary high-end retail tenant(s) (such as a high end restaurant, food service, health club, or other community based retail tenant(s)) will flourish with the other shopping opportunities along York Avenue while also adding an incredible lifestyle value to the residents of the building. this development will give Edina residents a wonderful living option as they downsize, retire, move, etc.while still staying in the community they love. The project will also establish a better utilization for the Wickes furniture site and eliminate the existing dated structure. We strongly believe that this project will become a catalyst for future redevelopment opportunities for other properties going North along York Avenue. The strong pedestrian connection and community terraces will dramatically enhance the walkability of this area with connection into and throughout the site. Special attention haseen paid toward the building materials and massing to properly fit within this community; creating a place that is " Pure Edina" by incorporating elements from the surrounding areas such as the limestone that i5 on City Hall and other Edina structures. Architectural Description The architectural design nd massing of this project is based on guidance trom urban aesign aha architectural design principles developed in the City of Edina's land use plans and timeless city building strategies. The design and massing creates a new fabric and a better street definition along York and Xerxes Avenues. A large opening in the building mass breaks up the south fagade and allows for both increased solar penetration and a view enriching vegetative courtyard. The architectural expressi on and materials of this project will incorporate contemporary materials and fagade composition. The building materials will feature a transparent glass storefront, masonry, and "Edina" limestone at the street level, above which will float a traditionally inspired composition of masonry, architectural metal, and large amounts of glass. Special attention has been paid toward proper setbacks, material usage, landscaping, and privacy along Xerxes Avenue where our development is adjacent to the single family residential community. Building design details include a dark, grounding two-story podium, segmented to reflect the scale of the homes across the street, an activ� street level with walk-up units, expressed with a front porch entry design, the creation of three-story bays to create plane changes and additional stepping in the facade, and color and material changes reducinglthe appearance of height. 2014.03.03 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 2 LENNAR MULTIFAMILY COMMUNITIES 1 1300 E. WOODFIELD RD, SUITE 3D4 I SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 1 847.592.3350 Streetscape and Public Realm The design of this development features streetscape improvements including new pavement, street trees, and lighting. The groundscape will feature green landscape elements, high quality pavement, pedestrian gathering and sitting areas, and decorative fighting. The sidewalks will wrap the entire site allowing neighboring properties a through -way access from York Avenue to Xerxes. This pedestrian connection will also create a one-third mile walking path around the site as a safe walking path for residences and the community. Distinct nodes will be linked to these sidewalks as community terraces. These nodes will both highlight the residential entrance and commercial tenant on each side of the facade facing York Avenue. Safety of pedestrians walking along York will be improved with a landscaped buffer and increased sidewalk width. Green and Sustainable Features The key sustainability strategy for this project is to create an urban mixed-use, pedestrian friendly community that allows residents to live, work, and play without dependence on daily automobile usage. The mixed use development will include a complimentary retail tenant to the residential tenants. The development team is committed to the sustainable design principles reflected in the City's comprehensive plan. Our sustainable design mission is to promote livable communities through the use of energy efficient systems, green building practices, reduced dependency on automobiles, creative density, high quality pedestrian and bicycle public realm, and the preservation of natural resources. The project will feature a series of green elements including green construction practices, materials specification, thermal high -efficiency windows and exterior envelope, and numerous permeable planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the amenity level roof. 2014.03.03 EDINA PROJECT NARRATIVE PAGE 3 MI 6725 YORK AVE. 6725 YORK AVENUE UNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES I te.,wE,MNm,.,n. 78" as ' a �, PROJECT TEAM PROJECT ADDRESS: MwIk ARE 4u.e Wq 11801]9 9M eanusst E�bn s...:o. cwwmamnb.M lM. LEnascev. c..—a.m. Rona.—ti.,SO- 2. k niN s'to .nn SiIMI: ..a. PLLc Rbo�N Obry MN SSIP gypmc S-,, Bbemi�Fiwy, Sub ttB fNoomi.9b.. MN-. �Ee osm x co.moc ,..rc.— 6725 York Ave S SYMBOLS LEGEND ® o00 Edina, MN w.......Lw•....s: UNIT MIX & SQUARE FOOTAGES I te.,wE,MNm,.,n. 78" as ' a �, PROJECT TEAM MwIk ARE 4u.e Wq 11801]9 9M eanusst E�bn s...:o. cwwmamnb.M lM. LEnascev. c..—a.m. Rona.—ti.,SO- 2. k niN s'to .nn SiIMI: ..a. PLLc Rbo�N Obry MN SSIP gypmc S-,, Bbemi�Fiwy, Sub ttB fNoomi.9b.. MN-. �Ee osm x co.moc ,..rc.— SYMBOLS LEGEND ® o00 O~ �wrtr.wU a .eriwwm min. .r••�aoo ®m- olllao —g-: yyp--4 1— tln+rmws � c•6er 1mrY 1' vorHwnw �+N-R HJ ��� ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 Oe..508Yw. FSG TITLE SHEET T1.1 ® o00 :•�E..., oNom � Ooh min. .r••�aoo ®m- olllao �.r-•—_ 000 �E,.1.: ��,••�000 :�.�r•�v- Tr'�0 � �f:'r.•w. 000 a� o00 � o00 0 Noo ollla sa—, •.- o00 :ice �0— F'3T» Opo ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 Oe..508Yw. FSG TITLE SHEET T1.1 0 - SIDE OF SITE (11-- YORK AVE.) VEVV NORTH OF SITE FROM TORK) EAST SIDE OF WE (ALONG XESIXES AVE.) Y- SOUTH OF WE (FROM YORK) 6725 YORK AVE. 61 ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/0312014 M�- ESG 6725 YORK AVE. SITE PHOTOGRAPHS AO.2 co IT] co 20 o —CCO—RE U @ 9 0 I mcc—oRs 0 m Eg I 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA POP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 . .. ......... . 213506 Vsc- 672SIORIAlt. =ORLS.UILDING M AO.3 e .x„ 19mdlry s �nr�9rR-ar h'; ul �� NNI sa g F.��ii. Its ®fo`�q R ,tea ond.�L Jew !� . �?! � II La �"i�yC"r�SA�N° ;�l19 (3►�`�` i 01 Ile s7 rAO �aR a rl 1111IM■117^- www�w�wwww__■=�ww==w_�www new_a�w�_s�ea�•����'�l��C��: ��sse= NONNI =11 �� V1 v! Cl -SS- CAiii �! malim Id -F.1 MP111,0, 11t.!lI1.11 !11 M1. 0 ■! ---` so ,! !j,'.. ,!ij�! I! °!itj is fI. ■! I!,!jtj! e. ,! !l .e 1! :10 tq pl®..t,■IlOT' ll I! f!P is p ■, 11 0 s ---- c n,- ■■ !, !iu 0.1 m !,g !I Ail s 1! ■■ i! a 1! ■■ 1! ■■ lil on pt ■■ 1! '10 ■/ .. /1 it .■i ■! ..■ q / 9 p ■■ ■/ .■ _y p�.■ _ ■! ! r Irtil.�tf !i .s ,! ■. ,! ■■ W! rt ...■ :..n I■ a .: I! .._ !p :■ n n III .� .:1111, ,! !I M! M !I !M'in !1' u _-W n .1 , �. !ln�JI1 ■! I! ,. ,! 11 ■. ,..■ ■. ■! IS I ,! !, !■ ■! H I! I! !I !■ X111, M !,1; ,! all 111 .t, I! !I Ail s 1! ■■ i! a 1! ■■ 1! ■■ lil on pt ■■ 1! '10 ■/ .. /1 it .■i ■! ..■ q / 9 p ■■ ■/ .■ _y p�.■ _ ■! ! r Irtil.�tf !i .s ,! ■. ,! ■■ W! rt ...■ :..n I■ a .: I! .._ !p :■ n n III .� .:1111, ,! !I .. __�I��1 .�_� y .� ! �. s. !11 _-W n .1 , �. !ln�JI1 ■! I! ,. ,! 11 ■. ,..■ ■. !, is 111 111I1 11 11 ■! !I is III !1 !, PI !■ ■! 1! 1! I! II! 11! 1'! !!f 1! 11I ■! M is !!I !!11 I! 111 11! 1!I !11 !I !I !I 111 in �fII I! III Il111. tl ■■ I!! .■ IN till ,II an 11 '■. ■. Igll11/, II 1.111 ■! 7,11 1, �'/,1` ,/ IIiI' ■■ t .■ ■- f � !■ ,! III ■■; n .■ 1! ■■ i! a 1! ■■ 1! ■■ lil on pt ■■ 1! '10 ■/ .. /1 it .■i ■! ..■ q / 9 p ■■ ■/ .■ _y p�.■ _ ■! ! r Irtil.�tf !i .s ,! ■. ,! ■■ ',n ■■ 1! 0: ■! a /, i!i Int ■! 1..1 q r - -_ - -: CI! I! !, on !,7 ! .. 1... i! '. 1! .. a .. ■! i I ,! I.■i_ ■! i■I !, @BUILD PG MASSING SECTION WESTIEAST 6725 YORK AVE. 11 -- la ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA POP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/0312014 ESG FSG 672S YORK AVE. BUILDING SECTION A4.1 'amp" ■ Alm MEN I 61IN 2 N O ik lin8.4id k -02s Vxc.�See Wa8 '�� r cc j�yW=i1'� {(m _ a3 �'Y E Baa np >g�$ a€•v g°5��F55wc z .e a'm� ,C�yyssl;I;� pN2\\= +R � � ^.� F'✓ 'S� a`= $;$o s��•Yc3a<�_o-€ .E �"'_ =a �� till ��:1 p2�p W3Eg 8�1 3 ��•�� B°��Y i� .`. vo .°a keg IES°fmb;s`'6sWno � a�° 'E'er al�V ��g 2SB €6 a5$ °'QE 5 Vs Ido:N• •ms°"ofi"' era $ oo 69n `$Y-F:xB"e�oe�BE e ' ;E@ m bb:' Ya^3.Y B yL"e � uT'"°-Y6..=r6: Y o r, .•� n 5 � S k t V �a/` g4k ioLS 1Yo'°'c 'fi aan o 35 kn�ae°u5a ii,S° pX �� ES �± •� : = E¢ _ n:L V-1 Fx 8m .- �° -� B E. • e Y ao�Cs`< ' _ a -a E g- an t R r. 1133HLS H/191S3M �1 pI n� a �. +�3HE i, eY eE 3 •Y. _� � °��Y I. 1 a y — I Ee °T-- .._ '°'Ye EY_ ` ,�Y gg•Se��555=� �a • � _c\ � � eF e € — �?�� E3 �! • _ g ^ �•6 _ — •.. �.aa—uer —Y �' - , i s s-. 5 ' _��\� :.`� - -e e F�— Jrr—�"e'S�—1;ot,'/.00s '{'�""' •-��— e�'— E g _ i i- _ F4��8=9$Ois�7 ` `p ,.s:. . .:-sea.. 4 °I I d" �• � � ' $ s��=`' Y � � _ i ° a `�,� r',r _/^ LTy`.�^±� ^ E � 9I 5 x I � •E a t?s a •` § B q 8'am g ' `�,y �� tet, � q��C�� � i �,L• � d .'C,J � k�. '� ^ B/ a ; ,�§a� m�n86�.$`�d�n: i, �ry e z:n- - Isqq .E .o� � :..� �. I I i; `s wux a - }•� e RN • arsv 'r I�. Lc) Ib ��® "-"a rr �I ." � � �, ` • :� ea "�°�`�.,"' E�^* �. ay e' p,� s �� ,6 a ;F .ilY ,� � ` '�;-F: I z.s. Ya. W Y '."'° - E sips^a s��m m • _ Is�3 4 8$a % �a �s x "a "s ici>'?qv.3`".• _ 'ai� ..gi E4 g(1gst E E�$� '� as ms ice i' .� vnU -`,�gg Y Efg :}L§'a{� ;.$.BSBg k F�E a s n i zr a ra.• ',"B 9 \ a 3 B�.m 8 'B•'FFi a'n" g, 6`81am3B9c �•�, E�^ IIIA ef•,) a� rel s ec_ a/ a 3'. ,. ggtt, E €;' ,\tea L..B3i� �'�\ @ ai:•J a i "°..�—� 'was. i �r 3�, � ��©�,, �&YYm�€i€:::_5sg�ssYei$ ® ?�� S> �a Ae �, �; p'`E ,3�`� -%7-.'-'4_-r=sw� �l r-, '�'• s� s6/�I �� � �� ecgses e� ssssa4_3s Oe5a .�a =sY>� r:, •��'� ! 3 -° � ^ �— � �� �,y ,I .'� @Y sm scsa[$o �o$g€dg€gg000�o !F ^ a °"' �sa�•1 s. i ,.E. — 1 45:1 -3—,_i t.aa;' a 3 i�i� (: •':s d°eaae��lii:��:e � . tt . i .n gyp—. .: —_ \ , 9/FL .r I cp „ .. �'� v�T °� ' _• Y .E nu "I",a �I Y a •a �°sws, a °Q'a a� LOng ti I0. p` eH— wr '-�,� o"a )i I "•��` a: f.03Y i� � AY tee+ � t\ a ^� / If 9 ��:Fs's€asFcfF��€Eli �ui / ? S (:):5:•sa: a s••saa i •156 I \d ___ e- $$ SHI HIM ni BN a _ CJ e ee '�Y3 ^.. � � Y � y \ 'L / I ) � €•e. s'; ..'55eee5�s"5"a" Y>lg sal � � � a yd'% SG'=� �E 9�R j J�° •Y$vimRB�@'d3�dCC [ I��p ° eel a \�• %oi _ m n; $ i r< ° °l" �Bm Feb c @/ °° • i :•Y •� ` ______'-------�`n...<.T�_ r o. s$� age gs� B•s s �'Y iY ,.. .. •m,oJ-----------�Y .�,�� �•. .. I.,m: Bs: k 19 q` n 'aSsnzsnx"ssson ,4 •. � \ i / "�h —reBT ^.. 3Nvynu�ll➢F-', ••_$I— '+�^, y x �vW � .. ^ �'r Ji SY'a � � _ .. .t a ---- a6s-- 3- �— �— _ E S — �4 a ���� seii€ 3 www �• f£ a /' �I .. C s vvmm � Y u_ .i [zx ie. m � v v>nn V F $•my jz l t s A ^ p 3„LZ,90.00N OOT -6.3nN3AV .YYO,( E o B 5 v iY sYaYe :, a p� s A AL qq� rYi iY 8. � 0az i^�p ®� .s�.v, •.iii.•^8Y wma.m�3Y n°wmt�e vi -°w iY iY ®Y � °^Y gEz S 6725 YORK AVE. I ❑ ...,� III �LSV� L5� U �I o F_____—_____—__—__—____—____—___—_______,______��__—__-10____"-�__�__—_13_____la__is __—__� •M1••••••••••••••••,•••ry•••• I A e J I D I I E F G jI H I I J I I I 1 I Pun (.AKKInGI I ISSUED FOR ------- REFERENCE ONLY I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I--- SO PRICING SET _— I I 03/03/2014 a ONE Moon Now I 1 I Pun (.AKKInGI I ISSUED FOR ------- REFERENCE ONLY I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I--- SO PRICING SET _— I I 03/03/2014 I 1 I Pun (.AKKInGI CZ, Rao WZ !3 RE RR9 W. � zo 8w 0 zz Z ¢w 0 8cc rn z Z z All w: Q J � � Z - s ----------- All AaO �0 U. Z 8 Ji LL RrLq� AaO Ji AaO ---------- ----------'- i -------- -- ----------- (D4 ---------- -------------- rn, ------------ 0 ----------- ------------ ------- ------------ ---------- ------- ------------ ---------- 0 ---------- I-- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — - -------- ------- -- I-- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — - c.ne+Nm W"w (D -p Tcx DesN IxLn RRIEN - NACF SRT SACK. OR circ G IMJF PONE MPROVED EWAL). EEE RETAE. 7! I i 6 � i }. t A..nr ..... ... , •moi , , ,.. r ,x Fr ,. � ✓:� I i 4 7� � i i r r k�l'I %"A I r l zi I t I L � .. d �MT�tX t ,11 � ✓:� I i 4 7� � i i r r k�l'I %"A I r l zi I t „p Ieyanmwe au .tv A. 1+ 1 b(t.s 'evi' imps In aoma� 1 ege„wrea r..i)"nmw Ine�e,ew"s >ve.. s . u"... , ".. mw i" ..m. ➢lOvlimcN Drvn m n1.- — ao mm�I.s n«) M pam«« «� Im• euraa aS+. wax 't a+eper. x'O” t sxe ,ex w tn. wawnw nx a +e..+ unM"SPMi Mme mmes�cn»a. s'eepen'i'mme pW',y a mnoam rn,"K. om In. ,,.e. w «a« m aomoy.�m tn. ma" uo� A Io. keep tna +u +IxnpM eemp .n a+r Iv w«xn p,Ary me an. . REMOVE D(SRNG SITE PAVEMENT, BRE DONCRETE, \' AND CURB AND CURER ABANDON AND RENON EXISTING UNDERGROUND URUtt SEE LANDSCAPE PIANS FOR TREE PROTECTION OEIAILB SILT FENCE INSTALLATION TEIAPoRARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N I SEESHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDRIONAL NOTES AND .ALE ET DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. ektn ww+m SMem nMAM+ E. nN'. 9 . 150'8 www �e 939�N><am ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 ORIGNALISSRE ex„one nL\nsKKaeM,pmn mN 253SOG NM tJ. K_ 6725 YORK AVE. DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PUN C1.0 � ✓:� I i v k�l'I r zi I t . REMOVE D(SRNG SITE PAVEMENT, BRE DONCRETE, \' AND CURB AND CURER ABANDON AND RENON EXISTING UNDERGROUND URUtt SEE LANDSCAPE PIANS FOR TREE PROTECTION OEIAILB SILT FENCE INSTALLATION TEIAPoRARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE N I SEESHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDRIONAL NOTES AND .ALE ET DETAILS 6725 YORK AVE. ektn ww+m SMem nMAM+ E. nN'. 9 . 150'8 www �e 939�N><am ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 ORIGNALISSRE ex„one nL\nsKKaeM,pmn mN 253SOG NM tJ. K_ 6725 YORK AVE. DEMOLITION AND EROSION CONTROL PUN C1.0 FT w d REINFORCED CDNCRER UNDCRGRDUNO SiORACE SYS(pl i SEE SHEETS C1.3 AND C1.4 FOR ADDITIONAL NOTES AND DETAILS i ly ee er.m epi em dvnrmp. ogee: e.i«. er an« eovw.uw. e6i:py rpm .1 dildn. w nay wmomem is mm.m o. iIx en Ha Ins nmtx pmt. :n wae�to to r.r onl�mm�en as wev i r mn n ma m�mrmdn rme r«irpaien mple 4 mmeo lipna�y.m«mp.I m.ieaawol. m is q eo.ad.mn wtn conn wncrete, ab apnv rt dlumuww n.. we, pI p.auct. pypiy°v w.anea mreemle gwrn KK.. a.eeetone, 6725 YORK AVE. aa,««w�,nenegNnm A 6 iwFa 3 l 9t. 5 31 B'i ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 OIII41NnL l::DE. w,At�e REVISpNS Nd, De poon Date 213506 NM �_ 6725 YORK AVE. CRADINC AND DRAINAGE PIAN C1.1 t c.u..n Iwaw •Ile h uoro -�epi 000 s; I ------------- ,7 f } 1 1 t 1'� • I: �1 I t . 6725 YORK AVE. Eelm., uN d-ntxn�m grtAam artNlMa �6 1�3� ml 9� Sa i50ae � W Wm r:n aYemn�`rm 1 { ISSUED FOR J z REFERENCE f ONLY LL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Ilu��re mlr ,E: 11 CITY OFEDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL s �19d � ddm: 03/03/2014 11! IIC .. oxw NUlssue eamn • 1 i II: ,I •./ r� � I Nw ou�a4cm oue 1 I i 213506 IIS 6725 YORK AVE SEWERAND WATER UTILITIES C1.2 m 2 ems u� 0 11: oil 6725 YORK AVE. Eelm., uN d-ntxn�m grtAam artNlMa �6 1�3� ml 9� Sa i50ae � W Wm r:n aYemn�`rm 1 { ISSUED FOR J z REFERENCE f ONLY LL NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11 CITY OFEDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL s „III 03/03/2014 .. oxw NUlssue eamn • 1 i REVISpNS ,I •./ r� � I Nw ou�a4cm oue 1 I i 213506 6725 YORK AVE SEWERAND WATER UTILITIES C1.2 m 2 € x 6725 YORK AVE. u � � (ID) BULK HILLS SPRUCE + + + + + r+ 1 + f . e (t]I STELU D'ORO DAYLILLY (W)BLONOE AMBRION BLUE CABANA (241 FIREOANLE DOGWOOD (21 RED SUNSET MAPLE EXISnNG TREES TD REMAIN RYP) (441 BLONDE AMBffaN BWE GRAMS IRI RED SUNSET MAPLE (180)ARTIC FlRE DOGWOOD CRUSHED STONE S.-NOpE } OPEN GREEN SPACE CURRANT :. SUNSETIMPLE _ } :.. W.. 9 .Ax TPm °y ,(31)STEIU -1. (w) BDOncaus (R PUNTERS WITH (11)WHITESRRE BIRCH - ' Ri1MINTJULEPJUNIPER Mev w � evY, MYL LLV I—THAL/ ANNUALS - IBI MINTJULEP • Ii41 LITTLE LIVE HYDRANGEA r�o n.. •. .ov xONEV OLUdi JUNIPER : am�wO.n.amNwona..v:.Nan wnn•r. aa.w (e) FRONTIER ELM m�///®/ •.rxmnw (607 HAPPY RETURNSSOD .- _. u) p ---. _ - .-.... - - _ _ -� X ISSUED FOR r --- _ 1,),M� ---- REFERENCE SOD HouEYLocusr 4f -._: ... ,': W ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION N • _ " , FOENSUR I601 HAPPY RETURNS I DAYLILLY ,- .10ERSTER GM53 -- _ SOD REED GRASS - :I 1 f PL,N]ERB -.- _-- - CITY OF EDINA PDP & REZONING SUBMITTAL 03/03/2014 s R Ism. Dale f RTI STELLA RO DAYULLY N, USi - PUNTERS WRH (19)MIME JUNIPNIPERR _ ` 1 I (61)3ODACNNIB ANNUALS RENRNS OAVLJLLV < . ' 213506 \2)FIRE-DOGNOOD Yl26:lA 5-D IS IS PLANLEGEND (IRI FIREWNCE DOGWOOp RI AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE AUfVMNBUiE MULEAUTUMN BLAZE MAPLEIIT STELLA DroRO DAVLILLY (teI FIREMNCE OOGWOOp (121 FlREDANCE DDGW000 R FlRE DEWUOUSSNRUB EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (TYR) (B) WHITESPIRE BIRCH 8MDOMEEROIISSHRUR 6725 YORK AVE. _ ODEODMIUBTRE �1L....SCAPE PLANTING PLLA1AN - D r 4D• xo• • LANDSCAPE PIAN - � r o Ami GENERAL NOTES 1. CONFMCTONBHA. SPECTME BREAA'OLEMIAEFLLBRARWTH E%6DNG M RMN9 REUDNGD] THE NATURE AND SMPE OF M. 2 CDNTMCION SHALLVERDY PUN_M AND BONG M THE ATTENTION OF THE IANOECAPEARLMIFCT NSLREPANC2R N10]I AMY ....BE ME OEBK4I OR NEEM OF THE LAYOM. S. CDNRMCIOR SHALL ASBIIBE MNpLBANCE WN APPLICABUMD. AND REEUUTRNR-.MND ME WORR AND MAT ERMLS BNFLEA. A. COR vTOR SHALL PROTEIT IODSTNG ROADR,fURBSGUTIERS, TRAM TREEB, LAWNS ANO SRE EIEIAEMSDURIMCONSTIWCIIGNMERADOW DANAGEMBUEB.-EREPAIREDATHO ADDRAWLLcosiro MEOWNEa S NDMRWDE BMLLVEREYKENMEMANO LOGTINEBMEERGBOIRAAND ABOVE GMREUTRIIIFS AHA PRWIDETNf NECE95.VO'PROIECTENPoR GIVE BEFORECON5IRUCIENBMW IMNIWJN IV CIFARANCEI. 6. CONTMCOR BILA MORDIEJ4TE ME PHASES OF DONSTRUCTON AND FUMING INSTALLATION L'JITH NTRKi0R5 WORNWO ON SITE. T. UNDERGIR 0BIILIIIES BIMLL BE WMALLED Po THATD2 N. W NOT CM THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMR OF IX6TNG TREES TO REMUH B. TXISDNGCONRYUF5,11VNLS, VEGETAMN,CLANDEBTTER AND OTHER ELEMDJTB ARE RASED UPON NFORNAIEN BIJPPLJEB M THE UNDSGPEAWNREGT BY OTHERS MNTMCTOR SH4LLVERW DMIERARC2EmIBRIM ONSTRUCTIDNANDNODFY IANDSCAFEARCHITECTOF6NAE S. NORQOMALAhDVERiCALAIIGNNENTOF%iOPOBEOWAlICS.iiW6SOR R0AWlAYBAREBUBJECi 10 REM __REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOGLIDED TONXRUPNC CGVODNSANR TO MIMWif TREERENOVALANDGRANNG. CHANGES IN AL DNAENTAM GMB --BE APPRWED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCM PRION TO HONLEN2MATAµ 10. CONRVDttJR SHALL RPAIELY ME Bn MIA DEFICIENCIES IN BRE CMEITIONS YAICH MGM NEVA AFFECT RANT EBTABLOW,4A .SLANDOM OR WARMMY. BNDEVRADLE SITEtOHD-W SNNL BE BROUGMTOD2AT2NRDNOFME WJDSGPEAIICMIECT PRERM BEG-6FJGOFIAORK 11. COHRMCTOR 6 BESFOIW6lE FOR ONERRID"NTFNINCE a NfNLY INSTALLED MATERWLB LML TINE OFSIJBSTAMMLLOLIPLETEµ REPANOFA DFVANDLLIBNORUAMAGE WHEHUAYOCGJRPNNRM -I-AIA LLEMN 9HLLL BE ME RE9NN9WNSY OF THE UNDSCiAFE CON]MC10R. IL IXRT-O MMIXLSGNPICAMSHm MABSINGB FOLATE ON BRE SILLLL BE PROTECTED AND BAVEO UNLESSNOTEDTOBERFL]WMORARELO MNANAREAMBELAUDED. OLEBTAVREGRdNG EX6TINOPIANTLMTERMLSHLLLOESR000HTMO ATTAJINNOFTNEUR EARCgIfLTPRER M R - it. E%19NA TREES TO REWN. UPON OOECIION OF LAABGPE ARCMIN7T. SHALL BE FFRROEOAND PRLNED TO REMOVE DEAD IVOOO, DDMGEOAND RUBBWGBRANC125. 14. MNIRALTOR SMILFRPPARENASIJBIARAWRRIEN�VMRTIEBIRSTAMWWHPLETION WSPECIION DF UNDVUPE AIA SITE-PPOVENBRS PRIOR M ELBNRTNG FWAL MY REOUEBF. iS LONIMCIOR 51NLLN2PAINEAAASUBMTRfNNNICAlEA4-0ULLpUWINGRI0F WA9CME NSTALUININ,gRIGAIIONAND6RE-PROJEMDITBUPoNCpdPLf1IONOF CONSIR4C110N WsYALUTENAUD PRIOR V BUB.4TANM1LLcONPLERJH 16. 9YMBOLS ON PUN DMWNG TARE FRECEOEFR:E OVER BCHEf%RES D DISCREFNM.EB W OGNTITES IXIBT. SPECBEATN NW AND DETAILS TARE PRECEDEM E MR HDFES. PLANTING NOTES GRADING NOTES 1. GRAVING LWDS ARE DEFINED A ME -TUNE OF PFOPDSEO GRADE WRHIX6ING GMDEUNIESS IATEDOTHEIRME. 2 GRADNG LNRSANOIINTROF WORN 6IE]VNON PUNAREONLV APPRO%IWTEANO NAY BEAOJRTED W FIFLDBYUNDSGPEARCMTEti. YA'NWOUISIDEOFDIFSELMRSWILLBEDONEATIANDSGPE NNiMCTORR IXPENSE UhE65 OIRECIED BY UNDSCPPEPACHffECTOR bMJER N W RUING. ]. FM1UPJT AB MCEBSARYM FROINE A IANNIMA GRADE AWAY MD. RUMNG9 WITHIN LWRB OF CUNSRLLCTNIN. 4. NAMNN A ONEORN GRADE BFTLVEENMHMORS W ARE TO BE GRAVED UNLESS NOTEDO111ERM9E B E ENATIDM. IF SMYNN ARE FNWIEO ELEJATAN5. RMT ELWATANS TARE FRECETJERCEOVER CONTWRS. 6 CONRUCIOR SMLL MNTA MRHJC UIILME9 FOR LOCATION OF INOERGR01-D WNES.GBLEB. CONDIIRS.PIPER.IIA-LE3, VALVES OR OTHER BNHID BFRUCMIES BEFORE DIGGN.G. LANDI-E., CONDMCTOx BMLL REPAIR OR REPIACE MEABOVE FDA..B DURING MWIR AiRONATNJ ADORIOWLMET MM-NER. T. CONIMCTOR SHNL PRONNE PROPER EROSION CONIHOLNEASUREB AB REONRED TO NEURE DMT EPoSAN611EMTO AN ABB➢WFE MNWNI.SEE CNM1SPECIFIGTENS. a PROWBETEMPORARYCOVERNGFq]GTCH BASNSANDMAM HOIESLMILFRAMEDGM IB M1PLETE.SEECIVIL6PECIFlCATENS. PLANTING NOTES 1. MPLNTBIWLBEIN-EDLA-FNALGMDING ANDCONSTRLGTANMLSBEDNCOMFSM-112 NIAEDATE- L PROMBED PLANT IMTERML BHALL MNPLY WRH ME -HAT EDITION OF ME AMEN-MANDMD .11-ERYBTOG ANSI -1. O. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BENIN BRANCHND IA LDWER THAN BABOVE PAVIDSUIRALE 4. PRDPOSEp PUMNAIERNLSENLLBEIOGIEDAND BTAIIEDA55NTYNONPWiIANOBCIPE AR -T MISTAPPPoYE 9TAANG OF NANT AMTEFR LPRNRM BIDDING S MPUANTMATERMLSUBSIINTI0IR RRL RE ALCEFTED UAESS APFROVAL 6 GRANTED IF,` ME LAND6CAPE ARCXRECTTO THE CONRUCRIR PRIOR 1D THE SUBMWSROJ OF 9ID. g. ADJIRMFMS- LOGDONDFPROPOSEDPVM NAIERLLLSNAYBEAEMEBWRDD.IANDSCAPE AACXIIECTNJ6T BE NDTEIEO PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. PIAMN4TER ,DRENSTALLm PERMNIINGBETAIL9. a TREEWIMPMID, MATERML SIMLL BEIWO+MALLED "M BXEEIIHGAPPLIED FROM TRUNK FIARETO FlRSTBMNLIt WRM 9MOODIDAR%ED OEQNAIUS MEEB NAMED N ME FAL PRER TO DECELIBERt ANO REMDVEWRA,PM AFTER MAY I. TURF NOTES 1. SWARELS OISDIR9EDd210GMOEAUNLE55 AO1EDolHE1M'WE L WI21250DABIRS FAVED511RFACE3, FIASNED CNMDEOi BOD3FEDSMVLBE XELD I'BELOW SURFACE EIEVAtAN R TRAA. SU0. CURL E1G S 9005H1LLBELAIO PARALLEITO iXECOMWPS ANDSINLL MVESTA[LEREOJgMS. ONSLOPES i TREE PLANTING DETAIL SIEEPF. R 1µ4N k10R N DPAINAGE 5'NNE3.90D SYkLL BE 9TAIlEO SECURELY, PREPMR EESFEOIFIGTNN6fCTEN ME TFERMEBOI REUIFDN E%TFPEX PLAMNG S•MIACH DONOT-BLILICH NCOMACTwRNSIdLe STEM rs NEED MRRRR F1HRE Wµ SEEPUN EDEGI� G. WEALAN ARIES.SEEPWN .•/ �/ /- I NFRGINOWNWLSMLL -BRMTSMW LOOSENDOWNED yyti NINA-D0500.FORSMNUBS I i� lVA i7 . J A-.1•DEEPER THAM FOOT DF BLARE EDIMMAADEDINAN FNRRE BfDWITHSFAOEBY xwD TO WITH %AVTING90L 1 2� SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL uuDRluRBfD wMce T 3 STEEL EDGER PREPMESOLMR NOTE: ii2ENW2 BED 6EE6PE.iRG1DN BECTEN RELATE➢ TO IXT ERER NAIRNG TLRILCH BONOTPIACE_ 6' REEER NCOHTACTYJRHgANTS1EN MN 10 PUN EOGE COIEIIENYAAIES. BFEHNI _ EOGING.SEEPIN! 1 ICONTANERCNANDL ERMLSHNL I� I I'f MVER00T3 NANDLODSENEO FUIFINGSRBFRBPERPNNILLY ERTHEIEBARMB BDi1NA0F - EN10EeF0 WRHSPAOEBYMm - - - ' LANBIEYMH NANINpEgL DWIMpED511BNM0f /41 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL I PLANTING DETAILS AGAR OMBADRUISHLLLOLOND TRFJRNA PLUMB PoSRIONTWOLGIEMW ®IQW. ]'COMPAC.TEODD.- NMCH -EDID.- AFiERTREEPUNTI AMN PERA0. WMPTHFETNUNASOEnY 1 APPROJALBY UND9 ELATEDFYfEti. BEESPEC.SEC.TENRRATED 3UPON CUTIIEOFE'M BLE BNO NLLLHTO BELEVB.WI TT-_ f*r i CAI 04 ''7g,I iifTlil T1fg9�ff731 fFiB/.1A� il•R41^.A:I3.YL T1 d'filiRda RR •69ft! YLI[+7Liif _ES FIN15120GRAOE OO AOT PIACEMRLH NCOMACT t TREETNIMrt PUMDIEESWI0.00TFUBEV6WlEAT TOP OF PWEDDIL IFRODTFANNER OTVROLE RE NDVESDILWAIEVRIM1RFRflt - MILUNMmSTRAMOROEaR�OFDG-- AA, R IARDFRIFLIB. FI MEM - EEDDGEMADITEN V .SEEPUN COWACTFUMWO90LNM PEIECENTDRFDWJLDRYUmWT EGlo AS1M0F5e SET IMINDIDERMOT1'HA HERTIWNADJ. GRAVID. DDMT-TD OFFR TBALLWITHEOa P sOV. MRCXnNGWO -LED A•N VERT.EOGETD.MTTOYBEMR FNRHEDGMDE DNCESDDIas BFEEJ WPU -B. T_ PUNiNO -BETTLEDORGAMCUIaCN \ DNO ROOLEOLLL EOGERYtl STA%E, PER ZLEMEB'ETA sPEt. NOPE R J_ \ {y II�SCAWTY5IDESOFTREE PR 2PHALOF IMD6NRBEDSIJBGMDE C�PUN111G PTTTTOC DID WITH DE BTMVIDN WD FRE➢ARPo ma S¢ \ `TPMPPoM1 FORT RORTIRESD E FMATRO . FNWHEDOMREAAUEDGE t �I - FORDRbNVARIES.SEE PUN IIID �I FOR . - PER THAN ROOTBALL PULE ROOT BALL TBALIOPIIEs9UREs0 W TRDDT 84LDOEE NOTSNET ��NWNSTACI(ASREpARE0 PER 9PEC. i _i ����.� �1'I -III-IIr-I'`II�'i' °" �B�FD __.__AA_D�,HDLE6FRLWI]M• ��r-��i_u� _�`! =r i TREE PLANTING DETAIL SIEEPF. R 1µ4N k10R N DPAINAGE 5'NNE3.90D SYkLL BE 9TAIlEO SECURELY, PREPMR EESFEOIFIGTNN6fCTEN ME TFERMEBOI REUIFDN E%TFPEX PLAMNG S•MIACH DONOT-BLILICH NCOMACTwRNSIdLe STEM rs NEED MRRRR F1HRE Wµ SEEPUN EDEGI� G. WEALAN ARIES.SEEPWN .•/ �/ /- I NFRGINOWNWLSMLL -BRMTSMW LOOSENDOWNED yyti NINA-D0500.FORSMNUBS I i� lVA i7 . J A-.1•DEEPER THAM FOOT DF BLARE EDIMMAADEDINAN FNRRE BfDWITHSFAOEBY xwD TO WITH %AVTING90L 1 2� SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL uuDRluRBfD wMce T 3 STEEL EDGER PREPMESOLMR NOTE: ii2ENW2 BED 6EE6PE.iRG1DN BECTEN RELATE➢ TO IXT ERER NAIRNG TLRILCH BONOTPIACE_ 6' REEER NCOHTACTYJRHgANTS1EN MN 10 PUN EOGE COIEIIENYAAIES. BFEHNI _ EOGING.SEEPIN! 1 ICONTANERCNANDL ERMLSHNL I� I I'f MVER00T3 NANDLODSENEO FUIFINGSRBFRBPERPNNILLY ERTHEIEBARMB BDi1NA0F - EN10EeF0 WRHSPAOEBYMm - - - ' LANBIEYMH NANINpEgL DWIMpED511BNM0f /41 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL I PLANTING DETAILS ®IQW. ®CON� 1i1P11'}}T^Ipy3[;II--iF3FT.U�tT3?•Fil4•!t#'ti1 7+fil[SNR.Y�[ �. 7[IST.Ix�.7i1737ITA1�[dATF7TPf(7I!S`i �fIY+7\_t i CAI 04 ''7g,I iifTlil T1fg9�ff731 fFiB/.1A� il•R41^.A:I3.YL T1 d'filiRda RR •69ft! YLI[+7Liif _ES ��iG7[7SLN 171N :477L1IN�[Y:�ifi`I1�:1�t'YLLHl.t73V - �fIT+lI.1,{3 RE,�B1191.Ss4FIFII�[Ai^R'iL^'^ISE'E9:IE5.[h1FIl.lI>IFYJINaJaa:I:1.� �.7.[DHI� 1 N`i TAp^I7 [A't.B.B.B Z.H.[s3OWO §BATZYdN� �[,�[11iN333.1741l� ? HR;U IY$+lLIRHMH uiII9-3'!,V,D, I 2C :RT. I IISCONI.. T`BPXN37EFGV9I777::7: 3{ _��T1[11N'ta111111pgq'+g�l!��[_^.9G-FL1T'I^il8 sl:f..u.9Ll.Ti�ikL1A.[fL1L17['7PSF19Yi:17B PMnI'1.iT'S-Y�fYJ:L�['i[vl]J1�R9JTNi �C 1[' IJ�B I]1 I1 AY 1\'1111\-[ +]"I"^'1 !1^I is Vi'_��L713B1�[S[.11.F'1]SNaJN'B7B;1F!• �[7/!•L�9IJ=.•F:I7B{37e1d:L'FY'�[ T^�F9191RE'Ti-�i1Y:11�[3(KLII[F7YSF777�:11.1:� �<:.E71A1 B, TLPLLLL4SFi�[.'iu3+'+]Ii:�Y.SSP..'+1�ik]I;II..:f[3H:11[!7JSi973:EP:7:� PLANTING SCHEDUL jYJ � 6 72 5 YORK AVE. Emaa. uu mRMRW�N�w+nRA,enm, ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION r F EDINAEZONINGITTAL/20 44 AAL OnablMn oaAe 1111o,� JS 15 6R6 Y00.K AVE IAND6CAPE SCHEDULE d DETAILS LA1.1 MARCH/SEPTEMBER MORNING 9AM ;E Lr :'j, b rl 0 0 cD L—j Lj 0 Lf 41 !tF, 0 H D ri 0 L7 1-, r n � L i 13 , o El :1 Ej Xy c 0 Ll 0 L 0 . �il; M n n ❑ lb 15 v, r MARCH/SEPTEMBER MORNING 9AM MARCH/SEPTEMBER NOON ;E p rl b rl Li 0 cD L—j Lj 0 Lf 41 !tF, 0 H D ri 0 L7 1-, r n � L i 13 , o El :1 Ej Xy c 0 Ll 0 L 0 . �il; M 15 v, 0 1 n b c t rl y❑ MARCH/SEPTEMBER NOON MARCH/SEPTEMBER EVENING 3PM li p L D rl Li 0 cD L—j Lj 0 Lf 41 !tF, 0 H D ri 0 L7 1-, r n � L i , o El :1 Ej Xy c 0 n F L 0 . �il; MARCH/SEPTEMBER EVENING 3PM JUNE MORNING 9AM 0 11 0, U L D rl 0 11 cD N 0 Lf 41 !tF, 0 H D ri 0 L7 1-, r n � f , o El :1 Ej Xy c 0 n F L 0 . �il; M JUNE MORNING 9AM 0 ' n o a) L L U rl 0 11 0 F u 0 0 u 30- D ri 0 L7 V r n � , o El :1 Ej JUNE NOON JUNE EVENING 3PM "Mm---l-po 04� LL p U �l Li C, 0 ep 1 ED 0 11 0 F u 0 0 u 30- D D L A a ej u e3 c o El :1 Ej Xy c 0 1 0 1 n n rl n rl 0 . �il; D I 15 v, 0 1 n n JUNE EVENING 3PM "Mm---l-po DECEMBER MORNING 9AM lfz u p r n a Ij L u I L A r. 0 ep c3 ED 0 u fj 0 F u 0 6) 0 U U 30- D D ❑n u e3 c o El :1 Ej Xy cr 0 L, 0 n n rl Q ' n DECEMBER MORNING 9AM lfz u u 0 0 ep c3 c' 0 F u 0 6) 0 2, D ❑n ill" c DECEMBER NOON QECEM — 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHADOW STUDY 03/2512014 EVENING 3PM smDow sTu,r 6 0 c3 c' 0 F u 0 6) 0 ill" c El :1 Ej Xy QECEM — 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHADOW STUDY 03/2512014 EVENING 3PM smDow sTu,r 6 to /^ �) ❑ 0 0 0 0 6 ❑ DC7 0 a 0 ®i a 00 a \o p 0 o 11 p ❑ 0 0 0 n a\\ ?` 6 ❑ \\ \ 0 o DECEMBER MORNING BAM (DEC 21 SUNRISE: 7:51 AM) DECEMBER AFTERNOON I I AM ❑ 0 D ®i a 00 a 0 n D IVI a . n a � b a \\ \ ❑ o ' ❑0 co ® p� D o G ❑ 0. 6_:.. P ❑ o. [ D 0 C3 13 ❑ ES1 [ �z o 0 DECEMBER EVENING 2PM ❑ 0 a Q D d b a 0 n D IVI a . n a O Dpo 0 \\ \ ❑ o ' oo .. ® ❑ :00 G - p/ ❑a o [ [ \`... 0 ❑ 13 ❑ ES1 [ �z o a [ 6 DECEMBER MORNING 9AM ❑ p 0 a ° � O d b FJ o 0 0 p 0 0 _ P p V. o ❑ i 0 b I DECEMBER AFTERNOON12PM DECEMBER EVENING 3PM o C 6C��dC� p ad f"0 O o O 0 °0 o c 0 p O 6 q ❑ _ p D 0 t [ 6 a [ D � ----- - 0 :00 ❑ - DECEMBER EVENING 3PM o C 6C��dC� p DECEMBER MORNING 10AM p ❑ D 0 ❑ 13 ' ❑ P ® o o c ❑ < ❑ a a 0 Q D QO p 0 ob o ❑ ----- - 0 :00 ❑ - p o ❑f—1 o _ � 13 ❑ o 0 �z lS 6 O ° 0 ❑ 0 o DECEMBER MORNING 10AM p ❑ D 0 ❑ 13 Q° II ° IUf o ch o ❑ ❑ co 13 o 3 c 0 co a 0 0 O 0 p 0 ob o ❑ In o. 1103 DECEMBER AFTERNOON IPM, ❑ Cl p o a° ° 0 a a ° 9 o. 1103 o v _ � 13 ❑ o 0 lS 6 B O ° 0 DECEMBER EVENING 4PM (DEC 21 SUNSET: 4:41 PM) 6725 YORK AVE. ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHADOW STUDY 03/25/2014 Esc AEO.7EEEM• A WSBInfrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 &Associates, Inc. Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-48.00 Fax: 763" 5441-1700 Memorandum DATE: April 2, 2014 To: Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director Mr. Chad Milner, Director of Engineering City of Edina FROM: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE RE: 6725Fork Avenue Redevelopment Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686-51 Background The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed redevelopment of the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between 66th Street and 691h Street across from Southdale Shopping Center. The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed site redevelopment includes 242 multifamily residential units and 13,980 sf of retail uses. Access to the site will be from the two existing driveways on York Avenue. Currently both driveways provide right-in/right-out access. It is being proposed with the development plan that additional left turn access be allowed at the northern driveway. The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • York Avenue and 66th Street • York Avenue and Southdale site entrance and exit intersections • York Avenue and Site Entrances • York Avenue and 69th Street The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. Pq 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 2 of 14 Existing Traffic Ch The existing lane York Avenue (CSAH 31) is i roadway. Primary access to Y posted speed limit in the vicin York Avenue is 20,200 vehicl intersection are as follows: York Avenue at 66th Street - SB York Ave approa NB York Ave apprw EB 66th St approachi WB 66th St approach and traffic control include: th/south a 4 -lane divided `B" Minor Arterial Hennepin County c Avenue is by local streets and development driveways. The of the site is 30 mph. The current Average Daily Traffic on per day. The lane configurations at each of the study area affic Signal control ng 66th St — one free right, two through, one left ing 66th St - one free right, two through, two left York Ave — one free right, two through, two left York Ave.— one free right, two through, two left York Avenue at Southdale Site Entrance — Sidestreet Stop Sign control SB York Ave approaching Site Entrance — one right, two through NB York Ave approac. iing Site Entrance — one continuous right, two through, one left WB Development Driveway approaching York Ave — one right out only York Avenue at Southdale Sii SB York Ave approac NB York Ave approac EB Site Entrance appy WB Development Dri York Avenue at 69th Street — SB York Ave approac NB York Ave approa EB 69th St approachir WB 691h St anproachi Exit — Traffic Signal control ng Site Entrance — two through, one left Ing Site Entrance — one right, two through aching York Ave — one right/through, two left ;way approaching York Ave — one right, two left .-affrc Signal control Ing 691h St — one through/right, three through, one left ing 69th St — one right, three through, one left York Ave — one through/right, one left York Ave — one right, one through, one left PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts and daily hourly approach counts were conducted during the weeks on July 8th — 21St, 2012. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20% to 25% lowerthan the PM peak or Saturday peak counts. Therefore, only the PM and Saturday peak hoursere analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions fo, the area. The City recently approved the existing Southdale Shopping ( 69th Street and York Avenue. impact on the existing York A Southdale Residential develop Traffic Study was completed f levels. addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the anter parking lot. The site is located in the nortliwest quadrant of ais project is currently under construction and will have a direct enue traffic. Therefore, it was assumed that the traffic from the rent would be included in the existing (2014) traffic conditions. A r this development which documented the anticipated traffic P( 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 3 of 14 Figure 3 shows the existing intersections and driveways along each corridor that were analyzed as part of this traffic study with the 2014 PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. Background (Non Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions and any given future year due to other development within the region. This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area, traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However, in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic from the 2012 counts to the 2014, 2016 and 2030 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic growth, other specific none development related traffic near the site was determined and included with the overall background traffic. These projects included: Byerly's Redevelopment - The City has been working with Lund Food Holdings for the reconstruction of the existing Byerly's grocery store site, located in the southeast quadrant of France Avenue and Hazelton Road to include: a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store; a six/seven-story 109 -unit apartment building; a six/seven-story, 77 -unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot retail area, and; a six -story, 48 -unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level. This project is currently under construction and will be partially completed in 2014 and assumed to be fully completed for the 2016 analysis. Think Bank Development - The City recently approved the proposed redevelopment of the Szechuan Star site at 3655 Hazelton Road adjacent to the Byerly's site to include an 8,441 sf bank building with a four lane drive thru. The project is planned for construction in 2014 and assumed fully completed for the 2016 and 2030 analysis years. Fairview Southdale Hospital Expansion — The proposed plan includes the expansion of the emergency center, urgent care, behavioral health and observation area. The proposed expansion consists of a 77,500 sf (gross area), two-story building located on the north side of the existing hospital building. This project has been approved by the City Council. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. Edina Medical Plaza (6500 France Avenue)— The �Qity'recently aPTroved the redevelopment of the properties in the southwest quadrant of France Avenue and 65t Street. The proposed site included redevelopment of both the 6500 France Avenue site and the 4005 65th Avenue site with a five story 96,500 sf medical office building. However, recently the City was presented a revised site plan changing the use on the site to a 209 unit senior housing and skilled care facility. It is assumed that it will be completed in 2014 and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 analysis. A36 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 4 of 14 Additional Southdale Mall D Center about the current vacan following the renovations, the available. This figure includes leasable space will be occupies analysis. Future Restaurant Developn of France Avenue and 69th Str assumed to be 8,000 sf in size will not be developed by 2016 background traffic. :velopment - Based on the information received from Southdale y rates and plans for renovations, it was determined that hall would have an additional 143,880 sf of leasable space easable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all and included in the background traffic for the 2016 and 2030 t = A future restaurant is anticipated in the northeast quadrant in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was :h approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant t, will be open and included and included as part of the 2030 The estimated trip generation f:)r the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation rates usedestimate the additional development traffic is based on extensive surveys of the trip -generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the Saturday peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed uses. m . r _ Y A.I.I..1........1 I2!•nL....nr•tfd T. -;n %ONOrafinn 16tOle 1 - I.JLL//[oleo tiuuscawsw L.�.-•. • -- ------ PMPeak Hour Peak Hour Total In Out �Saturda In Out Use Size Byerly's Redevelopment 7 ,450 sf and 234 units 411 231 180 556 282 274 Think Bank Development 8.441 sf 206 103 103 182 91 91 Hospital Expansion 77,500 sf 24 10 14 3.0 12 18 Senior Housing 209 units 40 18 22 48 22 26 Southdale Apartments 232 units 144 94 50 118 59 59 Shopping Center 143,880 sf 533 256 277 693 333 360 Restaurant 8000 sf 79 47 32 _LIL__L 67 45 Source: Institute of Transportation Development Site Trip The estimated trip generation Table 2. The trip generation u other similar land uses as docs Generation Manual, 9th Editic generation for the proposed d, Trip Generation Manuat, yin Eamon enation in the proposed 6725 York Avenue project is shown below in 1 to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for ented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip The table shows the PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour trip ft 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 5 of 14 In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass-by/diverted trips. This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. Table 2 -Estimated Development Site Trin Generation Use Size PM Peak Hour SaturdaV Peak Hour Total In Out Total I In Out Apartments 242 units 150 98 53 126 63 63 Retail 13,980 sf 70 31 39 96 53 43 Total Site 220 129 92 221 l lfi 106 outu ce. insmuce u,/ 1 ransporranon P_ngineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition Trip Distribution Site -generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including the existing Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) and the travel sheds for the major routes that serve it. In general the Trip Distribution was assumed, 30% to the north, 40% to the south, 15% to the east and 15% to the west. The generated trips for the proposed 6725 York Avenue development were assumed to arrive or exit using driveways on York Avenue, and were assigned based on the ratio of existing AADT volumes on each respective roadway. Future Year Traffic Forecasts Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2016 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2030 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. Four improvement alternatives were evaluated. 1. No Build — Assuming existing lane configurations and traffic control 2. Access Alternative 1 — Existing condition, right-in/right-out at the north driveway. 3. Access Alternative 2 — Left in from York Avenue at the north driveway. Figure 4 shows these proposed improvements. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non -development traffic growth to the existing 2012 traffic counts to determine the "No -Build" traffic conditions. The anticipated 6725 York Avenue development traffic was then added to the no -build to determine the "Build" traffic conditions. Figures 5 — 9 shows the projected 2016 and 2030 No -Build and Build PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour traffic volumes. A3a 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 6of14 Traffic Operations Existing and/or forecasted ti driveways on York Avenue. 1. Existing 20141 2. Projected 2016 3. Projected 2016 4. Projected 2030 5. Projected 2030 This section describes the traffic operations for each Analysis Methodoloay The traffic operations analysis Highway Capacity Manual 20 are used to evaluate traffic opt Intersections are given a Level amount of control delay per vt peak traffic hour turning movt controls at the intersection. U minimal delay at an intersectio intersection is at capacity, and to make it through an intersect where there is more traffic tha may have to wait through mor stop sign -controlled intersectio queues on each approach at an acceptable gap for drivers on t The LOS ranges for both sil threshold LOS values for intersections. This variance with the type of traffic cont number of lanes, changing intersections, or other lesser g or decrease. operations were evaluated for the intersections and access analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 2 1 used to assess the operations and provides a summary of s derived from established methodologies documented in the 0 (HCM). The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that of Service (LOS) grade from "A" to "F" to describe the average zicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of nent volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic S A is the best traffic operating condition, and drivers experience n operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase on controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition i can be handled by the intersection, and many vehicle operators than one green phase to snake it through the intersection. At a n, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle all -way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an ie minor legs at a through -street intersection. alized and un -signalized intersections are shown in Table 3. The n -signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized as instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ 1. A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the raffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized )metric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase h33 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 7 of 14 Table 3 - Intersection Level of Service Ranges Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometries, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. Control Delay (Seconds) Signalized Un -Signalized A <10 < 10 B 10-20 10-15 C 20-35 15-25 D 35-55 25-35 E 55-80 35-50 F >80 >50 Source: HCM LOS, as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all -way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection, could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also, geometric improvements on minor legs, such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies, was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning -movement volumes, lane geometries, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro -simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration, and signal operations. The model simulates drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 8 of 14 Table 4, below, summarizes t e existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry, raffle control and 2014 traffic volumes assuming the Southdale Residential project is open. Tf e table shows that all intersection are/would be operating at an overall LOS D or better durin both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours with all movements operating at LOS t or better. Table 4 — Existing 2014 Le l of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = W Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis the year after the proposed 6' conditions which represents 1 of the analysis are discussed Table S — Forecasted No Buil LOS D or better in 2016 and 2 However, with the increase in Overall delays will also increa especially at the major intersec Street. movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. is completed for the study area intersections for 2016 which is York Avenue site would be fully developed and for the 2030 City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results and shown in Tables S - 7. shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall 0 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. iffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, )ns at 66th Street and York Avenue and York Avenue and 69th ffiS PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) York.Ave at 66th St C (E) 34 C (E) 29 York Ave at North Site A (B) 4 A (B) 3 Access/Southdale Entrance York Ave at South Site Access A (A) 3 A (A) 2 York Ave at Southdale Exit C (E) 26 C (E) 23 York Ave at 691h St C (E) 29 C (E) 27 C = Overall LOS, (D) = W Forecast Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis the year after the proposed 6' conditions which represents 1 of the analysis are discussed Table S — Forecasted No Buil LOS D or better in 2016 and 2 However, with the increase in Overall delays will also increa especially at the major intersec Street. movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. is completed for the study area intersections for 2016 which is York Avenue site would be fully developed and for the 2030 City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results and shown in Tables S - 7. shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall 0 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. iffic, some additional movements will be operating at LOS E. slightly from the existing conditions to the 2030 conditions, )ns at 66th Street and York Avenue and York Avenue and 69th ffiS 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 9 of 14 Table S — Forecasted No Build - Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS . Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative 1, shows that, assuming right-in/right-out access, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Table 6 —Forecasted Build Access Alternative 1- Level of Service 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SaturdayPeak LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 30 York Ave at North D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at North Site Access/Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 3 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 Entrance A (B) 5 A (B) 4 Entrance York Ave at South A (A) 3 A (A) 2 A (A) 3 A (A) 3 Site Access A (B) 3 A (B) 3 Site Access York Ave at C (E) 26 C (E) 25 C (E) 27 C (E) 25 Southdale Exit C (E) 27 C (E) 25 Southdale Exit York Ave at 69th St C (E) 29 C (E) 28 D (E) 34 C (E) 28 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS . Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Table 6 — Forecasted Build Access Alternative 1, shows that, assuming right-in/right-out access, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS D or better in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours. All movement will be operating at LOS E or better in 2014 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the No- build condition. Table 6 —Forecasted Build Access Alternative 1- Level of Service C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 86 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak Hour Saturdayr PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak rPeak Hou Hour LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at North Site Access/Southdale A (B) 4 A (B) 4 A (B) 5 A (B) 4 Entrance York Ave at South A (B) 3 A (B) 3 A (B) 3 A (B) 3 Site Access York Ave at C (E) 26 C (E) 25 C (E) 27 C (E) 25 Southdale Exit York Ave at 69th St LCJE�). 31 C (E) 29 D (E) 37 C (E) 29 C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement LOS Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. 86 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 10 of 14 Table 7 — Forecasted Build Ae access, has similar results as Ac operate at overall LOS D or bet peak hours. Specifielly the prof Access would be operating at a operating at LOS E or better in significant changes from the Nc ?ss Alternative 2, assuming a left turn in at the northern site ess Alternative 1 showing that all intersection will continue to ;r in 2016 and 2030 during both the weekday PM and Saturday ,sed left turn in movement from York Avenue to the North Site LOS C in both 2016 and 2030. All other movement will be 016 and 2030. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other build or Build Alternative 1 condition. o Alfov""fivo ? - Fowl nf.Cervirp 1 ablei — rurecu�leu Lti��u n� ���--.......... -- -- 2016 2030 Intersection PM Peak HourHour Saturday Peak PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour LOS (s Delay c/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) LOS Delay (sec/veh) York Ave at 66th St D (E) 36 C (E) 29 D (E) 46 C (E) 31 York Ave at North Site Access/Southdale A (C) 5 A (C) 6 A (C) 6 A (C) 7 Entrance York Ave at SouthA (B) 3 A (C) 4 A (C) 3 A (C) 4 Site Access York Ave at C (E) 31 C (E) 25 C (E) 28 C (E) 25 Southdale Exit York Ave at 69th St C (E) 31 C (E) 29 D (E) 37 C (E) 29 T>l'IT n_ A _ ..4.... T.. C = Overall LOS, (D) = Worst movement Lug �!)OUrce: w JD ty- ASWCiaw�, ill". Vehicle Queuing Analysis A queuing analysis for the exiting and future 2016 and 2030 conditions was prepared evaluating the anticipated vehicle queues with the proposed Site Access Alternatives. The analysis was conducted using the SimTraffi simulation software. Table 8 shows the results of the queuing analysis for the 2030 full build of the area conditions. The results found that duringoth the weekday PM and Saturday peak hours, with both access alternatives for 2016 and 203 conditions, the maximum and average queues do not exceed any of the available or proposed turn lane storage on York Avenue. However, at both site access driveways the maximum queu will block parking spaces. The maximum queue represents the longest length of queue that w s observed during the analysis period. In addition, observations at the other none site access intersections showed that, in some cases the maximum queues were exceeded. The observations were identified just one time during the peak periods with an extremely short duration of less than 2 seconds. In all cases the queues exceed the storage in the left turn lanes by 25 feet (1 vehicle) or less and would clear without blocking the adjacent driveways or intersection and not impacting through traffic. 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 11 of 14 Table 8. Site Access Maximum Vehirlp nnvnoc Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site and the PCD -3 zoning. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of parking spaces. The current site plan includes 6400 spaces. Table 9 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 9 — Parking Reauirecl ner Citv Cndn Use Size Rate Parking Parking Available Site Access Alternative (feet) Location Direction Approaching Vehicle 419 Retail 13,980 sf 8/1St 1000sf+ 86 95 Queuing Alt 1— Right -in 6/additional 1000sf (Retail / Restaurant) Stora a Right -out Alt 2 - Left in York Ave Southbound Left Site Access 110 NA 97 at North 328 (354) 514 Site Access Eastbound Right York Ave 50 72 101 York Ave at South Eastbound Right York Ave 50 85 86 Site Access Parking Demand The parking demand for the proposed site development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site and the PCD -3 zoning. Based on the current City Code the proposed development would require a total of parking spaces. The current site plan includes 6400 spaces. Table 9 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code. Table 9 — Parking Reauirecl ner Citv Cndn Use Size Rate Parking Parking Required Provided Multi -Residential 242 units 1/unit 242 419 Retail 13,980 sf 8/1St 1000sf+ 86 95 6/additional 1000sf (Retail / Restaurant) (9655 sf / 120 (Restaurant = 1/3seats (112) seats/12 employees) + 1/employee on shift) Total Parking 328 (354) 514 uvcti Cc. t-,tv uj r.utrtu — rt -.0 zoning UZSZrict The parking demand was also analyzed based on industry standards. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4rh Edition. Table 10 below shows the estimated parking generation rate and the anticipated peak parking demand on a typical weekday. This would represent the worst case conditions for the parking assuming the proposed full development of the site. AX 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 12 of 14 Tnhly 10 — ,4ite Parking Demand Der ITE Source: Institute of Transportation Pngineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed development plan. Conclusions / Based on the analysis documeiited in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed 6725 YoIrk redevelopment project includes the addition of 242 apartment units and 13,980 sf ofssociated retail space. The site is anticipated to generate 220 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 221 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing (2014) traffic operations, assuming the Southdale Residential project is completed, all the intersections and driveways on York Avenue are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall) LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build site access alternatives were analyzed. Access Alternative 1 included a right- in/right-out at the nortern access to the site. Access Alternative 2 included a left in access from York Avenue to the northern site access. • Intersection traffic operations for both access alternatives in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur asla result of the proposed full build conditions in 2016 or 2030. A31 Weekday Use Size Rate Parking Required Multi -Family 242 units 1.20/unit 291 Residential Retail 13,980 sf 4.1/1000sf 58 (4.1/1000sf / (Retail / Restaurant) (9 655 sf / 4325 sf) 13.3/1000sf) (98) Total Parking 349 (389) Source: Institute of Transportation Pngineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Based on the results of the parking analysis, it can be concluded that the parking proposed with the site plan would be adequate for the proposed development plan. Conclusions / Based on the analysis documeiited in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed 6725 YoIrk redevelopment project includes the addition of 242 apartment units and 13,980 sf ofssociated retail space. The site is anticipated to generate 220 trips in the weekday PM peak hour and 221 trips in the Saturday peak hour. • Existing (2014) traffic operations, assuming the Southdale Residential project is completed, all the intersections and driveways on York Avenue are operating at overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour.. • Intersection traffic operations for the No -Build conditions in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall) LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • Two build site access alternatives were analyzed. Access Alternative 1 included a right- in/right-out at the nortern access to the site. Access Alternative 2 included a left in access from York Avenue to the northern site access. • Intersection traffic operations for both access alternatives in 2016 and 2030 will continue to operate at an overall LOS D or better for the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday peak hour. • The queuing analysis indicates that no significant impact on intersections or access locations will occur asla result of the proposed full build conditions in 2016 or 2030. A31 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 13 of 14 • The proposed addition of the left turn in (Access Alternative 2) would not create operational or vehicle queuing issues in the 2016 or future 2030 build conditions. • The existing or proposed available parking would meet the City's Code and are below those identified by ITE. No parking space variances would be required. Based on these conclusions the following is recommended. 1. Construct the access and pedestrian accommodations as shown in the site pian (Figure 2). 2. Provide the proposed roadway improvements as shown for Access Alternative 2 (Figure 4), providing a left turn in from York Avenue at the North Site Access. This will require Hennepin County approval. . No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed 6725 York Avenue development. '7 6725 York Ave Redevelopment City of Edina April 2, 2014 Page 14 of 14 PPENDIX 0 LJ ,tib �P J a V�R DZ FW a N �Q P z CH OWE N � �~ r a <q ❑ v~ Rp a CU RVE Q n '2nd ST. W. 62 nd ST. 3. W. 62 nd ST. � W a <q a xQ � a GARRI SON o w � > w ST. 35 u n �q. Y U a a a °� _ o goo ft aoo ft w w 35. > U w 3 OQ UJ a > U a a v=i J o u °� W 64 th ST. a 64 th ST. ST. > a � =MINNESOTA z o W. Lh I a w� w w o r o W Q Y w Q Q > Q W. O 2' 0 a 65 th ST. a 6Sth ST. w o J Z Z O ZW (j U ZR: �o Lake w e oOf C) W. 66th�ST. z a ST, m ❑ a� Cornet SOUTH,Q ALEEF_ c1i z � Projec a t aR. tMWNESOTA 68 a LQ6UNp th Location � ROYCAR P� OR• �ST. TON LI RD. BALFANZ o �Q w 0 f �P� T, PPER RD. I� LP' WI TE R• oz DUDS pN L _ a ��q o 69th <F�RD WAY w na �W z - Jf W. 69th ST. ST. pU 3 o a Q Q Q O� 000000 0 BERRY M D�G o 1% w �oJ W. of 3l 70th o > a w ST, 0 Lu a �FRIn-2 C ANDOVER RD. > m}o a MAVELL Ew ~ -� � �O AS AGp p BEL VIDERE o J 4S �q LA. w , OR. C• w f9 n RFM DR£ C w o w o HAZELTON R x o a TRJ�! �q °ASPASIA D CIR �qAE o a a o w C l� N rGM CIR. pNNq pU pRF W. cJ� i °7 72 nd ST. } 9 N M Nyq tra CreP 39. � pR F M O cr zo HIBISCU o - <<E ~ fS � Q WORTH DR. � w v cIT0(i J AVE.FpNpELL DR. a ~ a J > a d M R. w N w OR. U Q Z W = � W � J _JPHLOX GILFORD DR. 3:o cwa z w m � 0 2 4th Lake HIBISCUS a a a> PARKLAW w CT. �� d `T ST. o N AVE. AVE. Edina a 'D � P�� I W. 75th QpPPY SORE LQ eP��� PLAZA ro u o LA. Y DR. '< a W. 76th ST. z � � w BLVD. , W. Y zo QO X 77th ST. 0 m a o 1 a C) MINNESOTA D R. oVIKING w DR. o IL t � x d 0 U 7 Q � b 0 %"� Traffic and Parking Study Figure e 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment City of Edina, Minnesota Project Location Map Printed: 3/31/1014 fr�n �ia:��nv It A I_ ii �iii�iiii 10 PIC ®rieie1I11111e C& F -ft STREET LEVEL PLAN 1:50 L e n n a r ^M� , Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment ' City of Edina, Minnesota site Plan kq3 I STREET LEVEL PLAN 1:50 L e n n a r ^M� , Traffic and Parking Study Figure 2 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment ' City of Edina, Minnesota site Plan kq3 oJ°e^f� Traffic and Parking Study Figure 3 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements \•., ,,F City of Edina, Minnesota 2014 Existing Conditions A lql fiY f +�11i1111J� 111 IAI� z Z MM Mtn w ' ° � r.�.� �. i111�iil�li1�111�111�� �.' • i . } �Zia Wilt' v ' Traffic and Parking Study Figure 4 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment City of Edina, Minnesota Access Alternative 2 i* Y viii V 0 9 'gym Traffic and Parking Study Figure 5 ffi)6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minnesota 2016 Access Alternative 1 ,x. A 46 LEGEND 0 Intersection of Interest :i •3 r, 50 (75) AM (SAT) Counts Turning Movement Direction �_.�. O) Traffic and Parking study Figure 6 @ u� ' ) 6725 York Avenue Red velopment Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minneso a 2016 Access Alternative 2 q^` Traffic and Parkin g Study Figure 7 6725 York Avenue Redevelopment Peak Hour Turning Movements •..k„�,� City of Edina, Minnesota 2030 Access Alternative 1 ME V 15 (20) - r 135(160) d j U c; o(o) Op A 1 t r 175 (165) o 0 20(20) �,44� 165 (195) L 55(65) t _ = r 0 d j U c; o(o) U I-- On t F 0 (0) 1 t r t .. ® 0(0) y 0n •>r On On , '4 15 (20) - r 135(160) d j U c; o(o) Op A 1 t r 175 (165) o 0 20(20) �,44� 165 (195) so (s0) 145(1as1 — o r 45 (55) U c 0 (0) 4 1 t f s r zm(zas) � o — s ®165(95) � 150(165) ti LEGEND - T Y'I OIntersection of Interest AM SAT Counts 75 50 (SAT) i . s k flvitf Turning Movement Direction 1 - ,>s+•A, o qf�� Traffic and Parking tudy Figure 8 e N 6725 York Avenue Red velopment Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minneso�a 2030 Access Alternative 2 .,�,,,�• L 55 (55) S _ = r 0 d j U c; o(o) 0(6) z 1 t F °n . o ® 0(0) y 0n •>r so (s0) 145(1as1 — o r 45 (55) U c 0 (0) 4 1 t f s r zm(zas) � o — s ®165(95) � 150(165) ti LEGEND - T Y'I OIntersection of Interest AM SAT Counts 75 50 (SAT) i . s k flvitf Turning Movement Direction 1 - ,>s+•A, o qf�� Traffic and Parking tudy Figure 8 e N 6725 York Avenue Red velopment Peak Hour Turning Movements City of Edina, Minneso�a 2030 Access Alternative 2 .,�,,,�• Sim NN Ij Ljj r. Q cli �• ,lir � � A N!] J �zi'^ - t ' w uj —f r O �257—0 (!1 . v t� LO L�d7 ��FJ ��►t-Y F..i�l; t 1r !�f` UF': 1.,-7 1 2iy / u I gtmoi,. tttuv count. uuui LIAM"' w BMW NTT i MINI i/I/illl f 'illlll111 lilllN ���ii �a0 �..� . - ��INdO/1 '� �,'�'RlI!lR1111 � . i�ltillfiNl�i�4 nlf�li � :a�llBilllli �IIIII!IIII111111 � �� '✓+n'.L4111 � `` F�+iwr�Ul! �2u141111 � e,�l( �_r-T HipII i PAN m;nlurrr c�;!u�e� _ .•gut 1 ._�,�� tm , � a = a . M•. l 4E 1. _ 1 7 A+r� � i q __ �� �3 1 • :V o • lY j • 1 I �� 1 • 41 I i � 41 -Iii llZ77 �iJ N Ildu K- ni. P �1: co Wtl d LI W 1 l ._ :51 ,, T Dula 1 INllllli IllfllPti 11FR211i if t i;{I': �'-� 1 � � I u �'oulJt 11[l9f u` I �illlll( u�uf ta�!'ltlEti �;ii1 �''! �Ilh'�III f �;2 auU I�'r�•� i EL -,it; to r79 7' �IRx'a u1'1"'n iil..`o Eff p '..d - t I� � p a' - v R iAiiblf x r7 3 71,11 W pp r 9 V L'. ��a sir �■ � � ,; r r✓ !rte_ � �.r�__....«�_ �� ����• t , ■i i iia f fir■ ®o A l5�..7° Lw E Emu mo layQ EO,7 E 7 [iii �- 11=17 ®l. :� .a� Ely lug �El��•!�%i l ��ysaa=' ilw !t -- ;,J� �y',ppa1 4- jh',�� it Whil L-1 LJ NIIST lit 99 L-1 ki -A L 71 01 ilk" L 'um fd 'All 1'92r-z� 12 10 two Lamm 10; mm mmij Mis � NMI/ �l NONNI FRO j1J, Commissioner Potts recused h Planner Comments Planner Teague told the Commisl (the former Wick's). Teague expl and the five (5) residential home currently zoned PCD -3. Continui existing commercial and the five apartment building with 22,289 proposed in front of the retail co provided under the apartments. Teague reported to accommod would be required as follows: • Building Height —from 4 • Housing Density — from 3 • Floor Area Ratio —from 1 • Re -guiding the land use fi Community Activity Cent Teague concluded the applicant 1 Unit Development. Appearing for the Applicant Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Multi Applicant Presentation the discussion. ;ion staff received a Sketch Plan Review for 6725 York Avenue ained the applicant is in negotiation with the owners of Wick's > fronting Xerxes Avenue. Teague stated the subject site is ig, Teague said the applicant is proposing to tear down the single family homes and build a six -story, 273 unit upscale quare feet of retail space on the first level. A parking lot is -nponent on York with underground parking for residents the request four (4) amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet I units per acre to 82 to 3.1 r the six single-family homes from Low Density Residential to s considering a rezoning of the properties to PUD, Planned ily Investors, LLC Mr. Chmielewski gave a brief history on Lennar and explained that originally they only considered the Wick's site; how ver felt only utilizing that site pushed the envelope so they decided to approach residential property owners on Xerxes to obtain those houses and add them to the site. Continuing, Chmielewski said they propose to build a high-end luxury multifamily rental community wiith complimentary retail. Chmielewski introduced Aaron Russet to further speak to the proposal.11 Mr. Russet told the Commission density and explained that the ci include the five single family hon they are proposing to build a 27' retail below. Russet said the attr hey are very happy to be in Edina. Russet referred to the Iculations presented in the redevelopment materials did not es they are hoping to acquire. Continuing, Russet explained -unit upscale multifamily complex that is six (6) stories with action to this site is the walkability factor, adding from this Page 9of14 h4 ro location the residents of the building have access to all venues, shopping, City Park, library, Government Center, etc. Russet further explained that their intent is to create an urban mixed-use, pedestrian friendly sustainable community. As previously mentioned by Mr. Chmielewski the area offers abundance to amenities and this creates an environment without dependence on daily automobile trips. Continuing, Russet said they are committed to sustainable design principles reflected in the City's Comprehensive Plan. He added their intent will feature green elements including green construction, practices, material specification, thermal high -efficiency windows and numerous planted green spaces both on the site as well as on the roof. Russet said they are also working with the White Group on sustainability. With graphics Mr. Russet concluded highlighting the following aspects of the project: • Open terraces on both ends of the project (pocket parks) • Walking paths of high quality pavement • Decorative lighting • Front doors • All parking is proposed to be contained within • Building is designed open to the south • Exterior building materials include transparent glass storefront, masonry and "Edina" limestone at street level. Above includes composition of masonry, architectural metal and large amounts of glass • Unit breakdown 7% studio. 40% one bedroom, 11% one bedroom plus den and 32% two bedrooms. Chair Staunton thanked the development team for their presentation and explained the Sketch Plan Review process is informal and nonbinding. Commissioner Grabiel stated he was encouraged that someone was considering purchasing the site and redeveloping the property. Grabiel acknowledged he was somewhat concerned when he first reviewed the materials; however, if the five residential homes are acquired that's a different story. Grabiel asked if three bedrooms or two bedrooms plus den were ever considered. Mr. Russet responded that this development would be a "rent by choice" and they have found that many people that rent by choice are either downsizing or desire smaller living space. Russet explained that at this time they are waiting for an update of the market study; however, it appears the market may be for smaller spaces. Continuing, Grabiel acknowledged this is an area of heightened activity, questioning if the market is sound for this type of project in such a dense area. Russet responded that population metrics indicated a drop in home ownership and for every percent home ownership drops a million families need a home. Walkability is also a very important factor in home choice and this area is highly walkable. Page 10 of 14 ASI Commissioner Carpenter asked if the owners of the homes have been contacted. Mr. Chmielewski said that process is'continuing through a real estate broker adding two of the homes are in foreclosure and it t�kes a little more time when working with banks. Commissioner. Carr stated she really loves the look of the building but does have a concern with the proposed density; which is clarly on the high side. Carr said she agreed with the comments from Grabiel especiall y on unit size, adding the two bedroom with den in her opinion would be an attractive choice. Carr said in her opinion the project is intriguing and if special care is taken in buffering the residential properties in Richfield this may be a good project. Concluding Carr noted that with regard to the retail space depicted on the plans the applicant should be aware for fuOre retail tenants that the abutting property is a large grocery store. Mr. Chmielewski said with regard to unit numbers, spacing and size it's important to find the right density to ensure that the project will be successful. Chmielewski said the property owners reside in New York City and their price for the subject property reflects the New York City market. Chmielewski said the development team would take under advisement all comments from the Commission and would make every effort to buffer Xerxes Avenue. He added at this time their intent through design is to make the units feel and look like townhomes/brownstones vs. th� traditional apartment building look. Commissioner Schroeder said hell finds the project and site plan interesting, adding he likes the connectivity and other elements of the project; however has a few concerns about the Xerxes Avenue side. Schroeder said the'IXerxes Avenue component of the project is the most difficult to address. He pointed out as prjesented the proposed fagade facing Xerxes Avenue is imposing. He suggested that the building by placing it on top of tF would better suit the site, addini Xerxes (Westin, new Southdale considering the projects impact i to be further reviewed. Schroed reconsider the large fagade and relocate a portion of the building nearest France Avenue. This change; in his opinion, height in this area is generally found along York Avenue; not iartments etc.). Continuing Schroeder pointed out when i Xerxes Avenue, vehicle traffic, especially truck traffic, needs r stated if left as is all truck traffic would only occur on Xerxes Avenue. Concluding Schroeder asked the applicants to consider "marrying" the subject sites loading dock area with the Cub Foods loading dock. This action would reduce and mitigate all delivery traffic. Commissioner Scherer complemented the look of the building but shared concerns over the amount of concrete on the site and its impact on Richfield. Commissioner Platteter stated that overall he's not opposed to the density of the project or building height; however, has a concern with the ramp accessing the underground parking. Platteter suggested that this access point be relocated more to the middle to avoid confusion. With regard to connectivity Pla- enhance pedestrian spaces. Co affordable housing. :er said he likes the incorporation this project includes to uding, Platteter said he also supports the requirement for Page 11 of 14 { 5 a Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague if he knows the zoning classification the City of Richfield has on their side of Xerxes (east). Teague responded he's not sure of that zoning. He added he knows that Richfield either has or is going through a rezoning process for this area to allow for more density. Grabiel said during the review process the City needs to keep in mind what's best for Edina while being respectful to the City of Richfield. The development team acknowledged that much of their focus is in "the devils in the details", adding they really appreciate the comments from the Commission. Mr. Russet acknowledged this site is a challenge; however believes it's worth it. Commissioner Forrest said that while the project has good points she is concerned with how portions of the project violate the Comprehensive plan. Forrest added as previously mentioned the homes across the street from this project will be impacted. She concluded she likes the look but has concerns. The discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the project has merit; however, wants the development team to take a further look at reducing the buildings impact on Xerxes Avenue, increase greenspace where possible, consider the City Comprehensive Plan during the design process, reconsider the fagade of the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, carefully consider the retail tenant mix, better design the building's access point and continue to work on the loading dock area and the underground parking access, etc. Also it is very important to work with the residents of Richfield to reduce and or minimize the buildings impact on them. Chair Staunton thanked the applicant for sharing their sketch plan with them. Staunton stated he hopes their venture is successful adding that so far no one has found something that could work for this site. Staunton reiterated his thanks and stressed to the applicant the importance of communicating with the City of Richfield. The applicants ensured Chair Staunton they would engage the City of Richfield and Xerxes Avenue residents. B. 2014 Wor Chair Staunton told the C mission every fall the nning Commission Work Plan is discussed and prioritized. Staunton sal hat at this tim e would like Commissioners to start thinking about the 2014 Work Plan. Sta on said topic suggestions should be forwarded to Teague or him prior to the Commission m tin Staunton concluded that his goal for finalizing the Work Plan is for some time in Sept er or October. Commissioner Scherer noteJoffmaybe Commission meeting. C missioners a VIII. CORREJPFONDENCE AND PETITIO d idea to discuss the Work Plan prior to a Page 12 of 14 A573 on Series 2013B was at a 3% in ere<Hovla ember Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2013-80, Awarding SaleloSeries 2013B. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Spragu enson, I✓ Motion carried. VI11.B. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW— 6 5 YORK AVENUE (WICK'S SITE) AND FIVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ON XERXES AVENUE TO THE ST OF 6725 YORK— REVIEWED CommunityDevelopment Director resentation Mr. Teague presented the request of Lennar Multifamily Investors, LLC for sketch plan review of its proposal to redevelop the property at 6725 York Avenue. The proposed project would also include five single-family houses on Xerxes Avenue. The proponent was in negotiations with these property owners to purchase and incorporate the houses into the development. Mr. Teague stated the property at 6725 York (the former Wick's building site) as currently zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District -3, and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. The five -single family houses were zoned and guided for low-density residential use. The proponent was requesting consideration of a proposal to tear down the existing commercial building and the five single-family houses and build a six -story, 273 unit, and upscale apartment building with 22,289 square feet of retail on the first level. A parking lot was proposed in front of the retail store on York Avenue and underground parking for residents. Surface spaces would be available along the north and south lot lines for resident's guests. The loading area for the market would be at the rear of the retail building and south side of the apartment building. Mr. Teague advised that to accommodate the request, four amendments to the Comprehensive Plan would be required: Building Height from 4 stories and 48 feet to 6 stories and 66 feet; Housing Density from 30 units per acre to 59 units per acre; Floor Area Ratio from 1.0 to 1.55; Re -guiding the land use for the six single-family houses. from Low Density Residential to C mmunity Activity Center. In addition to the amendments, a rezoning of all the properties would then be required to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Mr. Teague stated the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and provided comments relating to reducing the buildings impact on Kerxes Avenue, increasing greenspace where possible, consideration of the City Comprehensive Plan during the design process, reconsidering the fagade of the building as it relates to Xerxes Avenue, need foi continued work on the loading dock area and the underground parking access, and incorporation of afforc able housing. Proponent Presentation Peter Chmielewski, Lennar Mult property located at 6725 York A, York Avenue. Mr. Chmielews community with complimentary Aaron Russet, ESG Architects, I Avenue, landscaping, walking element, landscape buffer, and The Council discussion included the importance to include afford podium height along Xerxes Ave density, including some smaller i of the townhouses, concern with the concept of routing truck traff VIII.C. SECOND READING ZONING DISTRICT I nt roily Investors, LLC, introduced the concept of the sketch plan for the iue with five single-family houses on Xerxes Avenue to the east of 6725 discussed the intent to build a high-end luxury multifamily rental ded a presentation on the subject sketch plan, the setback on Xerxes h/sidewalk network, gathering spots, outdoor seating area, retail mcern relating to the six story height across from single-family houses, ble units, incorporating a green roof over the market, option of utilizing ue, improving the articulation/facade of the market area, reduction in lits in unit mix, greenspace, additional work needed on the appearance he loading dock area and underground parking access, and concern with onto Xerxes Avenue. — AWNG a2101FANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING THE R-1 & R-2 NO. 2013-09 —ADOPTED Page 4 � S" Figure 4.8 2030 Future Land Use Plan Land Use and CommunityFacilities Richfield Comprehensive Plan 4-15 Land Use and Comm unityFacilities is Medium Density Residential (MDR) The Medium Density Residential land use category was 3 derivedfrom the Single-family Residential -High Density category (R-SFH) that was included in the City's 1999 Comprehensive Plan. The medium density residential category replaces the R-SFH category. Naming this =-_ category medium density better clarifies the intent - - --- - --- --- ----of- the residentiguses -wit hin this category. Medium density residential accommodates attached housing, predominantly townhomes or condominiums ranging -- from 7 to 12 units per acre. Medium density residential z also includes manufactured housing. City Hall • Phone 952-833-9520 Fax 952-826-0390 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: March 27, 2014 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director cc: Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief From: David Fisher, Chief Building Official Re: 6725 York Ave — Former Wicks Furniture Re -Development Draft Plans Dated March 3, 2014 MEMO j p The Building Department has reviewed the above proposed project with following comments: - Provide a complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted to the city for building permits. - All exiting must go to a public way. - Provide adequate fire department access to the buildings. - The building setbacks must comply with the 2006 IBC for exterior wall protection. - Retaining walls over 4 feet require engineering and a building permit. - Provide fire sprinklers to NFPA 13. - Verify fire sprinkler requirements under balconies. - Verify the accessible parking is in compliance with the state building code. - There has been a 30% review with the building & fire department staff for this project. I would recommend that this project continues with the pre -construction meetings with the design processionals, contractor, the project manager and the city building and fire department staff. A5' City of Edina ° 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371 w�S�A, Fax 952-826-0392 • www.CityofEdina.com o Date: April 2, 2014 To: Cary Teague - Community Development Director u0 From: Chad Millner - Director of Engineering Re: 6725 York Ave - Former Wicks Furniture Re-Development Draft Plans Dated March 3, 2014 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: • A Nine Mile Creek Water�hed permit will be required, along with potential other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works, MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. • A developer's agreement will be required for the placement of the public water main and sanitary sewer and for any other pt iblic improvements. The developer agreement should indicate that the watermain and sanitary sever mainline are public. The agreement should also state that the City is responsible for the maintenance and operation of the watermain and sanitary sewer and in the event that the City needs to excavate for a repair of the system that the City is not responsible for restoring the surface, such as pavements and or landscaping. • A set of as -built plans will b a required with the.final C.O. • Staff recommends connect ng the watermain to the Edina water distribution system. Watermain cannot be connected to both Edina and Richfield distribution systems. • Details are needed on the nfiltration system such as expected infiltration rates. This would be part of the watershed permitting process. • Indicate on plans what utilities are private versus public by noting that on the pipes. • Engineering will indicate where to place the watermain gate -valves. • Construct utilities per Citylof Edina Standard Details. • Watertight sanitary sewerastings are required on all sanitary sewer manholes. • SAC and WAC fees will be�required. Staff will require a more detail Please contact me if you have a of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. questions regarding this review. hS8 G:\PW\ADMIN\COMM\EXTERNAL\GENERAL ICORR BY STREETS\Y Streets\6725 York - Former Wicks Site\201403xx CM -Edina Review 6725 York.doc Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Carla J Stueve <Carla.Stueve@hennepin.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 201411:44 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Steven J Groen; Robert H. Byers Subject: 6725 York Avenue Attachments: Carla Stueve P E PTOE.vcf; streetscape guide - approved 1995.pdf Hi Jackie, We reviewed the preliminary site plan for 6725 York Avenue this morning at our plat review committee meeting. Based on our streetscape guidelines, 6 feet of operational clear zone is required back from the face of the curb for a roadway with a posted speed of 35 mph or less. Based on our review of the 6725 York Avenue Landscape Plan, the proposed trees along York Avenue do not meet these guidelines. I have attached a copy for your use. Ideally, we would encourage the developer to widen the boulevard and move the trees behind the 6 -foot required clear zone, with the sidewalk on the outside of that space. We understand that there are utilities that may be affected by this proposed modification that may need to be considered. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please let me know. Otherwise, when this development reaches the preliminary plat stage, please forward that to us for further review. Thanks! Carla Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney-client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. HIE NEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSOORTATION DIVISION RECOMMENDED URBAN LANDSCAPE/ STR IETSCAPE GUIDELINES A 1 April 3, 1995 TABLE Of CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE CRITERIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 • Boulevard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 • Crosswalks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 • Curb......... 2 • Irrigation . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 2 • Landscaping/Streetscaping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 • Medians . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 • Operational Clear Zone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 3 • Right of Way . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 • Sidewalks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 • Signals, Signing and Other Traffic Control Devices . . .. . . . . . . 4 • Snow Storage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 • Street Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 • Trees .. ............................. 5 • Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' . 5 PERMITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 FIGURE ................................ 6 April 3, 1995 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION RECOMMENDED URBAN LANDSCAPE/STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES APRIL, 1995 INTRODUCTION Hennepin County Department of Public Works' Transportation Division (Division) has as a delegated function and responsibility to maintain a system of roadways that provide transportation for residents of the County in a safe, efficient manner. Year aground safety requires adequate sight distances and a minimum operational clear zone that can also accommodate snow storage. The Division has prepared this Recommended Urban Landscape/Streetscape Guidelines (Guidelines) to more consistently and thoroughly respond to questions about urban landscape/streetsclpe design practices. All landscape/streetscape plans must be prepared and signed in accordance with the Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Interior Design. The City Engineer shall also approve and sign the title or cover sheet for those landscape/streets cape pians. The City Engineer must, also evaluate sight distances along the project and assure the Division,. in a report, that sight distances are adequate. The placement of obstacles or fixed objects, such as structures, trees, etc., within Hennepin County's right of way shall be cause for the Municipality to assume legal liability and additional maintenance responsibility through a Cooperative Agreement. The following is an alpha guidelines for landscape/ inclusive or necessarily addressed to the Division of this document contains zone guidelines. • Boulevard The Division prefers methods may prevent t Municipality has the facilities behind the )etical listing of the Divisions recommended ;treetscape'design. The criteria listed is not all :omplete. Requests for more clarification should be Engineer or his/her designee. Figure 1 at the end a.summarization of the recommended operational clear low maintenance boulevard. Snow and ice control survival of some desired vegetation. The !sponsibility for mowing and the maintenance of -1- Aa April 3, 1995 • Crosswalks Crosswalks shall conform to the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). The County's standard crosswalk is a block type pattern, painted white, on top of bituminous or concrete pavement. Municipalities have the responsi- bility to maintain pavement crosswalk markings. after the initial painting. Non-standard crosswalk surfaces (such as decorative brick, -colored aggregate, etc.) shall require prior approval by the Division. Municipalities shall have the responsibility to install and maintain any crosswalk surface, as well as the abutting material, if the crosswalk surface is not consistent with the road surface. The municipality shall also indemnify the County for the use of a non-standard crosswalk surface. • Curb Curb design must conform to Hennepin County's Standard Design and the State Aid manual. Curb and pedestrian ramps must comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). • Irrigation Water from irrigation systems shall not flow or spray onto the traveled roadway or onto any County owned structures such as traffic signal components and signage. Concrete gutters shall collect excess water from irrigation systems and not allow water to flow across roadways (gutter in). Effects of subgrade saturation shall be addressed when irrigation systems are proposed. Provisions, such as perforated pipe, shall be included for the pickup and disposal of irrigation water. The Division will not allow an open cut for installation or maintenance of irrigation piping within three years of construction, so consideration .should be given to installing irrigation piping within a sleeve for -roadway crossings. Maintenance and repair of the irrigation system is the responsibility of the owner. • Landscaping/Streetscaoing Roadway gebmetrics and driver sight distances shall be considered when installing landscape items. A report 'indicating adequate sight distances have been maintained is required for all access points along the project. The report should consider all elements obstructing a driver's vision such as trees, shrubs, plantings/planters, structures, etc. Any loose landscaping material, such as bark, must have an adequate means of containment that will prevent the material from spilling onto the roadway or sidewalk. The Municipality shall 'be responsible for maintaining such material, if installed, and for removing the material from the roadway or sidewalk if the material spills onto those surfaces. Loose landscape rock is not permitted within Hennepin County's right of way because of problems caused during mowing, etc. -2- A43 April 3, 1995 The Municipality or to maintain visibili r has the responsibility to trim all plantings and Hennepin County's responsibility for landscape/streetscape restoration, after any County activity, shall be limited to top soil, sod or seed. Restoration of specialty landscape/streetscape items, sidewalks and plantings shall be the responsibility of others. The Division prefers traffic control signage to be located behind the sidewalk. Landscape/streetscape should not obstruct the view of signage. Landscape/streetscape should make allowances for placement or future expansion of utilitiesjwithin the right of way. Traffic control during maintenance of landscaping shall comply with MMUTCD for.1raffic control. • Medians The Division can suppl typical design standards for raised and depressed medians. Median drainage is a concern of the Division and should be discussed with the Division's Design Section. The Division's guideline does not allow planting trees within the median unless there is the minimum operational clear zoneilfor the.posted speed limit (see Operational Clear Zone). Plantings, including raised planting beds, in medians shall not be higher than 3 feet from the bottom of the curb gutter -line, however, sight lines must still be checked. Plantings should be kept as far back from the face of curb -as possible to minimize disturbance due to snow .plowing (see also Irrigation). If the Municipality proceeds with placing plantings within Hennepin County right f way, then the Municipality has the responsibility to trim plantings to maintain sight lines. ® Operational Clear Zone' To facilitate the safelioperation and maintenance of a roadway facility, an operational clear zonelis required. Encroachment into the operational clear zone causes safety and maintenance concerns. The Division standard provides an operational clear zone of 6 feet from the face -of curb where potted speeds are 35 miles per hour (MPH) or less. For speeds greater than 35 MPH to 45 MPH, the Division standard provides a 10 foot operational clear zone. The required operational clear zone for speeds over 45 MPH shall be analyzed on an individual basis by the Division (see Figure 1). • Right of Way Streetscape/landscape for the public and ow allow private enhance ;ems within the County's right of way are reserved- ; by the Municipality. Hennepin County does not its within the County's right of way. - 3 - 0 April 3, 1995 • Sidewalks. The Division recommends a sidewalk with a minimum 5 foot width and prefers the sidewalk be placed 6 feet from the face of curb to accommodate snow storage. • Signals. Signing and Other Traffic Control Devices All traffic control devices must comply with MMUTCD. For urban cross sections, the Division recommends traffic signs be placed at least 6 feet from the face of curb to the edge of sign. Sign placement is preferred behind the sidewalk. The location of utilities should be considered with regard to future sign placement. In areas where there is no sidewalk, clearance to the signage should be at least 6 feet from the curb or edge of shoulder to allow for snow storage and/or future sidewalk(see Snow Storage). Landscape/streetscape should not obstruct the view of signage.. Traffic signals shall have the Division's standard type and color. Any other color scheme requires prior review and approval by the Division and require the Municipality to maintain the paint system at no cost to the Division. Lead based paint shall not be used. Paint must comply with current Mn/DOT specifications. • Snow Storage The Division requires minimum operational clear zones for snow -storage along the -side of the road based on the posted speed limit. The requirement of an operational clear zone for snow storage,allows the Division .to,efficiently clear roads of snow and help maintain the road's traffic carrying capacity. Inadequate snow storage will reduce lane widths,, adversely affect traffic handling capacity of the road and.prevent trucks from using the partially blocked traffic lane: Roads that are not cleared of snow along the curb to the storm drain can also cause drainage problems when the snow melts. The Division may require that the Municipality obtain an easement if there is inadequate snow storage available within the right of way as a result of landscape/streetscape structure placement. In areas where landscape/ streets cape structures cause inadequate room to store snow off the road, the Municipality will be required to either move or haul away the snow (see Introduction for legal liability and maintenance requirements). • Street Lighting Street lighting must be functional and meet appropriate standards for illumination. Special consideration should b given to eliminating glare and shadows. Questions on lighting should b-. re•,arred to the Division's Design Section. acs April 3, 1995 •Trees Trees, in general, can obstruct the view of signs and signals. Prior to the placement of any tree, sight lines should be evaluated that includes consideration for fully mature trees and their canopies. The Division standardDoes not sanction the planting of trees on County right of way within the operational clear zone (see Operational Clear Zone). Planting coniferous trees is discouraged within Hennepin County's right of way. Tree�g.rates in sidewai s or paved areas, unless properly installed and maintained, can be a h zard to pedestrians, people with disabilities, and snow removal operation , etc. -The Municipality assumes all liability for the placement of any tree grates or other obstacles within the County's right of way. Irrigation, if deemed necessary; should be limited to a trickle type systdm (see Irrigation). The Division does not contribute to the replacement of any streets cap e/landscape alteration as a result of any highway maintenance, modification or utility work.. • Utilities Underground utilities 'that do not extend above the surface may be placed within the County's op rational clear zone. Above ground utilities, however, should be pla ed outside the County's operational clear zone. PERMITS The Division's Permit Ofi maintenance work within t time of work must be appy (Example: Parking in a t ice shall be informed of all construction or ie County's road right of way. Traffic Control and 3ved by the Division prior to beginning any work. raffic lane during rush hour is not allowed.) FIGURE 1 HENNEPIN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION DIVISION RECOMMENDED LANDSCAPE / STREETSCAPE GUIDELINES URBAN TYPICAL ROADWAY CROSS SE CT.ION 2' GUTTER OPERATIONA' CLEAR ZONE AND SNOW STORAGE BOULEVARD FACE OF CURB PLACEMENT OF TREES, UTILITIES, FIXED OBJECTS \- RECOMMENDED PLACEMENT OF SIGNS POSTED SPEED LIMIT MINIMUM OPERATIONAL CLEAR ZONE 35 M.P.H. OR LESS 6 FOOT (FROM THE FACE OF CURB) GREATER THAN 35 M.P.H. TO 45 M.P.H. 10 FOOT (FROM THE FACE OF CURB). GREATER THAN 45 M.P.H. ANALYZED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS BY THE DIVISION. APRIL 1995 6 ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business City Affordability Goals Since 1996, Edina has participated in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act program. The Livable Communities Act.(LCA) is a Metropolitan Council grant -based program to encourage communities to achieve goals in affordable and life -cycle - housing production and quality of life improvements. At the prog'ram's inception, the Metropolitan Council estimated the amount of the City's existing housing stock that was affordable and the City and the Metropolitan Council jointly established goals for the criteria of affordability, life -cycle housing (housing types that are not single- family detached units) and) housing density. See Table 5.2 on next 2008 Comprehensive Plan A—# Ronf+hmnArc and r;nah fnr Edina Table 5.2 shows the Metropolitan Council's 1995 estimates and City of Edina goals: ill 'I f� Edina Comp Plan Update 2001, — 5-5 Chapter 5: Housing - City Index Benchmark Goal Affordability Ohipwners 31% 64-77% 31 Rental 14% 32-45% 43% Life -cycle Type (nosh -SF 43% 38-41% 43% housing detached) Owner/re�nter mix 71/29% (64-71)/ 71/29% 30-36)% Density Single -fa ily 2.3/acre 2.3-2.9/acre 2.3/acre detached Multi-famly 16/acre 11-15/acre', 16/acre Table 5.2 shows the Metropolitan Council's 1995 estimates and City of Edina goals: ill 'I f� Edina Comp Plan Update 2001, — 5-5 Chapter 5: Housing A. e ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business � 2008 Comprehensive Plan ■ The City Index column refers to a snapshot of the Edina's affordable housing, life -cycle housing, and housing density taken from the data available in 1995. The Benchmark column is a range that represents the City Index average for communities within similar Metropolitan Council planning sectors. The Goal column indicates the affordable and life- cycle housing share, and the densities negotiated between Edina and the Metropolitan Council. Affordability refers to the estimate of the share of Edina's affordable housing stock that was considered affordable at the start of the LCA program. Life -cycle Housing includes housing types that are not single-family detached units; the figures are percentages based on Edina's total housing stock. Density means the number of housing units per acre for both single- family detached units, and multi -family units. The Metropolitan Council has identified new affordable housing needs for all cities and townships within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area for the period from 2011-2020. The housing plan element of local comprehensive plans is required to reflect the allocated portion of the forecasted demand for affordable housing. The City's share of this allocation .is 212 affordable housing units.by 2020. Current City Housing Programs Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) was established in 1974 for the purpose of undertaking urban redevelopment projects and assisting with the development of affordable housing. The HRA has facilitated the development of a number of low- and moderate -income housing developments, including Yorkdale Townhomes, Oak Glen, Summit Point and South Haven. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — 5-6 Chapter 5: Housing PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague April 9, 2014 VI.B. Community Development, McDonald' Director Westerly: Furniture s INFORMATION/BACKGOOUND Project Description - Border Foods Inc. is proposing to tear down the existing Taco Bell restaurant and rebuild a new slightly smaller Taco Bell at 3210 Southdale Circle. (See property location on pages Al A3) The building would be 1,850 square feet in size. (See applicant narrative and pions on pages A4—A26.) To accommodate the proposal to redevelop the site, the applicant is requesting a Site Plan review and the following Variances: ➢ Parking Setback Voriances from 10 to 4 feet from the north and south lot line. (Existing condition is a 3 -foot setback.) ➢ Front Yard Building Setback Variance from 35 to 22 feet. ➢ Variance for side menu board facing a residential area. (Existing menu board directly face's residential area.) In 1985, a parking stall setback variance was granted to add parking stalls for what was then a Zanti0o Mexican Restaurant. The variance was to match the existing non -conforming setback of three feet. As noted above, a four -foot setback for pa�king is now proposed. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Vacant Be guided Coi Easterly: Single-fam Southerly: McDonald' guided Coi Westerly: Furniture s guided Coi Buy; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and munity Activity Center. homes; zoned and guided low density residential. zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and munity Activity Center. )re; zoned PCD -3, Planned Commercial District and munity Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 18,700 square feet in size, is relatively flat and contains a Taco Bell restaurant and drive-through. (See pages Al A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC — Community Activity Center. Zoning: PCD -3, Planned Commercial District Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed utilities and grading and drainage plans and found them to be generally acceptable. (See the City Engineer's comments on page A27.) A condition of approval should include meeting all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo. A permit would also be required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Parking Based on the square footage and seating in the building, 17 parking stalls are required. The site plan demonstrates 17 built parking stalls. (See page A7.) Site Access & Traffic There would be no change to the existing site access or on-site circulation. The proposed restaurant would be smaller than the existing restaurant; therefore, no traffic study was required. Sidewalk Connections/Bike Racks Currently there are no sidewalks on the subject property. The applicant proposes to add a boulevard style sidewalk along Southdale Circle. (See page A18.) A connecting sidewalk to the restaurant would also be added. A condition of approval should include sidewalk markings shall be required across drive lanes. Bike racks would be located at the southwest side of the building. Minimum City Code requirement for bike racks is 5% of the total number of parking stalls; therefore one bike rack is required. (See page Al2.) Building Design The building would be made of Direct Exterior Finish System (DEFS), with prefinished metal and masonry veneer accents. (See building renderings and colors on pages A8—A15.) The chief building official F has reviewed the proposed plans and provided comment on page A27a. These items shall be addressed at the time of building permit review. Garbage Area Garbage would be collected with the building at the northeast corner of the site. The containers would be screened by a wall constructed of a Direct Exterior Finish System or DEFS to match the existing building. (See page A11.) Drive Through Fast food restaurants with a drive-through facility are a permitted use in the PCD -3 zoning district.) Each vehicle bay is required three stacking space in addition to the vehicle] being served. The site plan shows three stacking spaces for each bay. there would be four total bays. (See page A18.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 13, overstory trees would be required and a full complement of u',nderstory plants and shrubs. The applicant has provided a landscape ]plan that meets the city code requirement, including 16 overstory trees. (See 'page A22.) The applicant is proposing a 15 -foot landscape area along the east lot line, and angled the menu board more to the south, to minimize) impact on the single-family homes to the east. Outdoor Seating As recommended at Sketch Plan review, the applicant is proposing an outdoor eating area with a couple tables surrounded by a landscape area. (See page Al2.) Outdoor seating does not generate the need for additional on-site parking. Lighting The applicant has su Imitted a lighting plan that conforms to the City's minimum standards. (See page A23.) The foot candle power at the residential lot line would be 0.1. Compliance Table * Variance required Variances — Building Setback, Drive Aisle Setback & Menu Board Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 2 City Standard PCD -3 Proposed Building Setbacks North 35 feet 50 feet South 35 feet 55 feet East 35 feet 55 feet West 35 feet 22 feet* Parking Lot/Drive Aisle Setbacks North 10 feet 4 feet* South 10 feet 4 feet* East 20 feet 20 feet West 10 feet 10 feet Building Height 4 stories or 48 feet whichever is less 1 story — 21 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio FAR 75% 9% Parking Stalls 17 17 Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18 9 x 18 Drive Aisle Width one Way 14 feet 14 feet Landscaping 13 Overstory Trees 16 Overstory Trees Stacking Spaces 4 4 Menu Board & Audio May not be located on Located on the Systems the side of a building side that faces that faces residential residential property ro ert * * Variance required Variances — Building Setback, Drive Aisle Setback & Menu Board Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with 2 the code and that �he proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. The proposed building is smaller than the existing building on the site; the green space setback for the parking stalls would be increased by one -foot from existing conditions; and the menu board would be moved to the south side of the building and pointed away from the residential area to the east. (See page A7.) Moving the building closer to Southdale Circle also reduces the impact on the residential property to the east. The practical difficulty is the existing size of the site, which makes it difficult to develop the site the meet the existing setbacks. As mentioned, variances have been granted in the past for the parking lot. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The small size of the site, and its location next to another fast food restaurant to the south, is unique in the PCD -3 zoning district. The City also encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building, and expanding green space. The proposed site plan would be an improvement over the exiting site plan. 3) Will the variance ,salter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed Ilbuilding would not alter the character of the neighborhood. Agin, the proposed new Taco Bell and site plan would be an improvement over the existing building, landscaping, menu board location and green space. PRIMARY ISSUEWSTAF F RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposed neW Taco Bell Restaurant and associated Variances required reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the PCD -3, Planned Commercial District. 5 2. The proposed new Taco Bell building, menu board location and site plan would be an improvement over the existing conditions on the site. 3. The variances are reasonable. As mentioned, one foot of green space would be added along the north and south lot line, and the menu board would be moved further away from the single-family homes than the existing menu board. 4. Moving the building closer to the street also moves it further away from the residential area to the east. 5. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing size of the site, which prevents a reasonable site plan configuration without the need for a variance. 6. Pedestrian connections and sidewalks are proposed on the site plan to help encourage pedestrian movement in the area. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Site Plan with Variances for the construction of a new Taco Bell restaurant at 3210 Southdale Circle. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the setback variances. 2. The proposed variances are reasonable. The proposed building is smaller than the existing building on the site; the green space setback for the parking stalls would be increased by one -foot from existing conditions; and the menu board would be moved to the south side of the building and pointed away from the residential area to the east. 3. Moving the building closer to Southdale Circle also reduces the impact on the residential property to the east. 4. The practical difficulty is the existing size of the site, which makes it difficult to develop the site the meet the existing setbacks. 5. Variances have been granted in the past for the parking lot. Approval of the Site Plan and Variances are subject to the following conditions: no Subject to staff apI roval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site clan date stamped March 7, 2014. • Grading plan date stamped March 7, 2014. • Landscaping plan date stamped March 7, 2014. • Buildi'ng elevations date stamped March 7, 2014. • Lighti ig plan date stamped March 7, 2014. • Buildi g materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one- half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property ownor is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated April 2, 2014. 6. Building plans are ,subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 7. Bike racks must b provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 8. All crosswalks shall be marked with duraprint stamping to clearly identify the pedestrian crossing. 9. Trash enclosures ust be constructed to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 10. Compliance with the chief building official's requests in his review memo dated March 27, 2Q14, at the time of building permit review. Deadline for a city dec July 1, 2014 7 Name: I Total: Parcel 3210 Southdale Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Commercial -Preferred Sale Type: Price: Home- wf a Sale stead: Date: { , 0,43 acres Sale Area, 18,810 sq ft Code: v Ln" II 19 t i 1> C" i . 9 651 H ST Wi - _I tU ! I W; . r Sheridan Parlt' t ` i '� w. . ! ; - cs 1/2 sr v\' s Lur '53Luj �) V i 7 Ll r AA .67TIJ 51' W w _ t t to 1 : sem.4A _..._ tnii t �69TH r. - : •. l �: i f { .- W ) _ Parcel Map Scale: V = 800 ft. N A -T -B: Torrens ID: Print Date: 1/2/2014 Owner Market Name: I Total: Parcel 3210 Southdale Cir Tax Address: Edina, MN 55435 Total: Property Commercial -Preferred Sale Type: Price: Home- t Sale stead: Date: Parcel 0,43 acres Sale Area, 18,810 sq ft Code: AI This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished "AS IS" with no fepresentation orwarranly expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A -'Wink Green! Hennepin County GIS - Printable Parcel 29-028-24-31-0008 ID: Owner Name: Parcel Address: Property Type: Home- stead: Parcel 0.43 acres Area: 18,810 sq ft A -T -B: Market Total: Tax ' Total: i Sale Price: Sale Date: Sale Code: Map Scale:l" = 200 ft. Print Date: 1/2/2014 Page 1 of 1 This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is Furnished "AS IS" with no representation or warranty expressed or implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. COPYRIGHT© HENNEPIN COUNTY 2014 A 11iink Green! Hennepin County GIS - Printable Map Page I of 1 A3 border FOODS Current Address: 965 Decatur Ave. North Golden Valley, MN 55427 New address Effective 4/4/2014 5425 Boone Ave. North New Hope, MN 55428 Border Foods Application Narraltive for City of Edina Staff, Planning Commission and City Council Border Foods is a franchisee of Tao Bell Corp. and has been operating the Taco Bell Restaurant at 3210 Southdale Circle since 1996. Our�principals are Lee and Jeff Engler who have been operating restaurants in Minnesota since 1980 beginning with Los Primos Restaurant in Southdale. Border Foods is proposing to scra a and rebuild the existing Taco Bell to a more current brand image. Since 2009, our company has completel scrape and rebuild projects at Rice Street in St. Paul, Columbia Heights, Rochester, Eagan and Brooklyn Center in addition to twelve remodel projects throughout the metro and in greater Minnesota. The proposed use is a continuatiop of a restaurant use with a drive thru window that has been operating at this location since 1985. The site plan'I proposes a building that is 1,850 sq. ft., rectangular and utilizes one way circulation flow for efficiency and ,Safety. To provide as much distance from the residential property line to the east, the building is placed as far to the west as possible, which is an 18' foot front setback. This provides 45' from the face of the drive thru cub to the rear of the residential property line. The parking setbacks to the North and South property line, ad'acent to commercial properties, are at V feet. The menu and audio board have been repositioned to face the south property line of McDonald's. To create a better pedestrian experience, Border Foods has incorporated sidewalks, a bicycle rack and outdoor seating into the design. Our land cape architect completed a two part analysis of our project compared to the Starbucks location on France Ave ii(attachments included). The analysis revealed that the Starbucks has 23.9% of open space and the Taco Bell has 120.7% of open space. With the 3.2% variance in open space between the two parcels, the analysis next reviewe the quality of the vegetation. When comparing the plant materials within the Starbuck's parcel boundary area, the vegetation is comprised of shrubs, ornamentals and grasses. Any over story trees, which Starbucks included in their calculations on their landscape plan, were leveraged from the plantings of the overall Centenniz I Lakes landscaping requirements. By contrast, the quality of the proposed Taco Bell landscape plan is highe because of the inclusion of 10 over story trees and 6 ornamental trees. Within the boundaries of their identified) parcel, Starbucks did not include any over story or ornamental trees. Not only does the Border Foods proposal exceed the City's standard for over story trees by 23% this also translates into a greater cost per square foot dedicated to landscaping as part of the overall budget for the project. Our project's storm water managlement plan includes volume banking. The water quality volume required for the project is 2,003 cubic feet per, Nine Mile Creek Watershed requirements. The civil plans propose upsizing the pipes to 24" to provide 2,55911 cubic feet of water quality volume. This upsizing provides an excess volume of 553 cf which is 26.6% above the required cubic feet for a 2.5" rainfall event. A Four variances are requested due to practical difficulties encountered during site design. Neither the applicant nor the fee owners created these practical difficulties. The variance requests are: 1) Variance of parking setback on the North side of the property from 10 feet to 4 feet; 2) Variance of parking setback on the South side of the property from 10 feet to 4 feet; 3) Variance for front building setback from 35 feet to 18 feet; 4) Variance for aside of the menu board & audio system to face a residential property. The parking setback variance requests were initially granted back in 1985 to the previous restaurant user. Border Foods is asking for a continuation of this previously approved variance. The setback requirement of 35' on all sides of the building encompass 4,321 sq. ft. or 23.1% of the parcel. Moving the building forward allows the following adjustments to the site plan for safety and aesthetics: 1) An increase of the distance from the face of the drive thru curb to the rear of the residential property line to 45'; 2) Allows inside seating for pedestrian customers who want to visit the restaurant; 3) Allows fora more comfortable turning radius in the one-way circulation pattern; 4) Allows the 15' parking setback to be used for spruces which is a denser plant material screening buffer; 5) Allows better placement of the audio system and menu board with an only non -audible side to be facing the residential property in contrast to the existing placement which is directly facing the residential property; 6) Allows reasonable access and safe servicing of the trash enclosure. The menu board and audio system placement have been relocated from the current location on site facing directly to the residential property at the rear to the south facing McDonald's. However, a narrow side of the menu board and audio system still face the residential property. Thank you for consideration of our project and respectfully ask for your approval. WCL NORTH VICINITY MAP waNmMpp I- Al WCL TACO BELL 321D SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 GQ� SITE PLAN !Tl D BELL EDIfJA, MN �E� YV %1 SIDE ENTRY ELEVATION EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE SYMBOL AREA MANUFACTURER COLOR 1l MAIN BUILDING COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6122'CAMEL BACK• ❑2 WALL COLOR BEHIND SCREEN WALL SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW 6831 'CLEMATIS• ❑3 ACCENT COLOR SHERWIN WIWAMS SW 2823'ROOKWOOD CLAY' 4❑ SI.ATWALL AND VALANCE COLOR SHERWIN WILLIAMS SW7034 °STATUSBRON.'V ❑5 PARAPET CAP COLOR - PRERNISHED DARK BRONZE ❑6 SIMULATED MASONRY VENEER BORAL STONE PRODUCTS PROSTONELEDGESTONE'VINTAGEWINE'PRO-082284 ❑7 STOREFRONT WINDOWS TBD 'DARKBRONZE- 5 PIPE BOLLARDS STREETSMART YELLOW -1/4' THCIK PLASTIC COVER (US.POSTMAN,COM) OR EQUAL BEHIND SLAT WALL 31DNADE PREFINISHED METAL STOREFRDNT 0 WCL TACO BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA. MN 55405 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A8 ewIMMILPH PINMH SCHEDULE H DIRECT E%TERIOft FINISH SYSTEM IDEFS) 2 ❑ DRiECTEXTERIOR FINISH SYSTEM IDEFS) 3 ❑ DIRECTEXTERIOR4 FINISH SYSTEM REFS) PREFlNISHIS11-L ❑ VALANCE AND SLAP WALL PARAIPETCAPMETAL FLASHIN SIMULATED MASONRY BEHIND SLAT WALL 31DNADE PREFINISHED METAL STOREFRDNT 0 WCL TACO BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA. MN 55405 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A8 ] ; � FI / (§ §; 1p F -I El oFRONT ELEVATION u...w• ��SIDE ELEVATION --l- m n (1 REAR ELEVATION FlIN 9H SYSTEM ( jpEFS DIRECTE%TERIOR FINISH SYSTEM (DEF91 BEHIND SWT WALL SIONADE 4 SIDE ELEVATION WRECTE%TERIORPREFIMSHEDMETAL 5 ❑ pREFRRSHEO METAL FINISH SYSTEM (DEPS( VALANCEANO SWT WALL PAAAPEl CAP FLASHING El -,-E.,ED MASONRY WCL A,acIW..Lie. BELL 7210 SDUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55475 PREREFRFlNUHDNEDT METAL - STD-� TRASH ENCLOSURE ELEVATIONS A16 i � z et Jholl, *-..dgg I \�3 r I r` jV 60 A�cM1lecls�e Indo 0 TACO HILL EDINA MN � MDDEIVIEW ' `f N GLE WCL TACO BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 65035 MODEL VIEW 44 F S..J MODEL VIEW No .GALE WCL TACO BELL 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 norm. MODEL VIEW Ma« A4 �7 �1 MODEL VIEW N E WCL TACO BELL 321090HTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 y cQ�s MODEL VIEW A6 KEY NOTES DEMOLITION NOTES e E O IMM DB51YI BUEDpIc/5]RUCBrR AND/OR SRE xARIRL Op a begin tlpmpRlwn unM P.am.lwr •Mmwnl ron h a b acro. O _ CDIICR R Puree pI yuolly [p�VDI me •ro NNI IDw a coot pl Nap Elrggi •wee Gty RepneenlDtnev. T°Fvnueae, • inimum. rovlev al vapunl pm5n9 w nrcv[ ° O BENDVE CIADN, SIMAINOUS AND CD CREME PAVDACM. Qu's W. INe Cily Engit u I, } Use ap inlet III ! aciNe alarm er inlab. Refer t° deloN. UNDII( E {FANrtR p rx Oi cs. AND 1R[[s. eroved onlecrwn pn 4. W.I. M I,— I UITIy Y prior b antl drN evmaYlipM1 [iMy pce5en hewn an eetl bnt avaBable infwmalion and aro not quunnteee. Control privble u1RRy a rv4ce Ipr N cawracfun eM .mewl AEIrD1T IX'151111c PAxtWC lm UCNE Db n•c , .,. .ry pl ,mil• far III— u , bl a UUn9 grUNnge v d its teabne. °lar eerole REMWE IXl51xG $wN. O; RelOmoven ei U l.aurca one its lvaluroa that intortors ,Kh be Dtppro. c n % Weler AENWE IX6TIN9 iFAIIME AND AADCN]ED CWPpMENIA O Canlreclaf bleI.. 9•.., 5arvice peronna Pmmh it epu'ne rrom IM Ob• 5pn I— veNNa one water nrvke moot D° tlbepnneeletl pM Inepallod prior Ip V b6. tlbut DRNIE Nnll U U11 SEANCE PRDADp ]DR RfLpG]NN, bNCDNNECIIDN, RlIPBRNri CAP _I brol'wn sf wpM and ..;tory .mics. Szs pt ...9 wpb, ranks in •Inel u 8� DIP, but olio a rclx 1".,q DI it. NE Q "/OR RENDVAL AS NECFSSnRY. DIYexNFG] AND RD1WE p]SIIIIe WATER sERN1C[ Dp CRY RFDVIRFu[NR race t° n4Unp buUfrq a un4rwxn. Size of ni•I'mp apmtoH aero, In alml ie 6' N:P, ba •kb °I eWbry nl•nwn b nY1'�q Duggn9 V unvnewn. Laro9ro of Torr rola saNbH nMeee A vlroa b Pmperty nne we emea pn tity inlemglipn, Dul bcptbn a asrvke• fnm prpgrlY IW Ip O raw MAIp sfMFt 4 APPROwNTL CDMRACFDR RCSPDXSBIE ID IIFLD VJCALE NIB AgIUSi AS NECRSV]L VIA vutingp""' ie Ungmrn. CDN.cter Ip Mbrminv Nxe pn0 bootie. pf •mic•• arW .pert 61Minppaa t° Er L.• Cop Sore Ip Me O CfXmWiDR AND PENP'E pbRN[ SANITARY I..SSAWIIDI�ENANDpPRJADE IEYPDRARY CAP. LOCAIIMI IXI.D.IYSt NN 6roNA9LEpDS nRD r ntl at P ..d ronnecl'wne Der ulffb qan antl romws pips• ve'n9nB puilNrg. Raman Ne oral•, mebr pRer to bu9f demolition arty 0I_HIT Ip ins Cry. 6. c:!TCI,, b [pprNwb !fib [.dT" piumbef fpr vie. mler antl anluplian '-I,6' VCP wNlary .Cr I1%4]NEC[SSARr. SFE DE40111gN N016 ] 0. PR01ECf IXISfvle TRE[ 1N PUCE r aeKc• wvprovtl b .main Irom pnpegy ` b nnilvry main in Ne It Dntlirwa 1p Oe Nor ewmr, an nr I° daxmbe it _._I mmnel/nDweemml n•stl a Ipr Pprtbn ham PROTECT p6RNC PYIHr PpE Axa 52N M PUCE CDDRDNAIF WBH OYlxp ]0.P IX6DIL EIFC]RC PSCDNIEECf ANB REIRDR] NECE45•M' FDR RE-EDNNELTD, evnilfry robin Ip prpp°Ity fine. B. Remove nmp6ibn febris Ahb, 24Z- 9nRv.ge of cpNvqq•e -u- u not permillee pn alta. 0 PRxEC] IX6TINc FENCE x PIAC 1D. athnt nIaA9.Clbn.luna bol my b .room m own tlufin9 cpn•Irnlian. .4c.arHlNn9 dp-I. O SAWCUY AND AEVD/E IXISiwC BINNINgR PAN32M AT NTN. 2.D' WDTN rRON uP EOC[ D, III. DuIY BrtuNINDUS I1. pwwm•M Moe by •pr wt pl 1u el rvmevq u.:L n d pinvrrpv. R 1 mq prour el nnnat PAVFM[Ni WTLCOMwpmi5lwc PAVENEM DGFMllOtrb IND �Oss SQL o.l.clbn to beyond roti! al ro coal tp� •owner. 12. Du nal impetle n• bq uulb cFaulaipn Ip Ipront M w •Ina•. ODTE p6TXc OxvflYAY CURS M AND PREPME ]OR RE-CDNSIMF]pX Mlx CDHCRflE CDxCPEIE Nwl'AY APRmI Pp SBE PUN. CDDRNIuiE SC 1110 -E w N I3. Sulrl .,uuil -11 N vl ptvd lv °tlar for the npl.c.-t pl a al 1°pnil Iw dburbed °nae b by STREET. SANCur p6hxe CURB AND BRUNNWS PAVFNEM PER CDY STANDARDS. 14. AD epwiwtncUon pM pool-ro.lfuclipn ppM1bq snpll by pn-etlp. At nor . •hotl porbirg, beQrq, er O PxD}Etr dlslwD CURB AMD/wf BRUYNgA PAVFNEM w PUCE CONIRACfwe RFSPON - DINACCDTC�3�Sr /TDDRQ D 1111—®DDAWE ll erp°w' b°roIs-.Id pubc vinae ab. ann peuc RBnqpawe.I,NRNINDUSE gp.1��p° 16nlnl nunml b. b, Clyb A, domplNMn. !,cr. erDY REMOVE EXISTING - - '-STORM SEWER e STRUCTURE. --PROTECT EXISTING 12" RCP STORM SEWER AND tepee PREPARE FOR NEW Lo STORM SEWER V\ STRUCTURE PER / �e '4* UTILITIES PLAN C5.D. if ` / ranho� Q �w - 116 I' r� 879.7 15 DISCONNECT EXISTING WATER ^I SERVICE AND 87g' SANITARY SEWER _ 14 SERVICE AT PROPERTY LINE PER CITY REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLY N WITH ALL PERMIT ICf tc CONDITIONS. 879.5 PREPARE FOR EXTENSIONS TO Core 1 NEW BUILDING. ucP , 89°4T36" E 129.3$ \ f3-• -w l -._. rro fA 9� F� 3 Park,rtg stalls �.t -t3 877. 34LIght 8191 • tc � �. I \ %9 )br to m,n o N- I;l 'su r fN-_-/e x890.51 /-..W/.O BBI.14 �'A..1;4curb ].tea %sATn con"cre tea 1 .O 881.57 •: 1q a�'4 \ � yQAOrI par*rrrg s+gn \I 32.1 6 s 881.9 ,- top 1 RI 998.9.9 Xdg Fr on DL - 161 -1 k161'9 I -Story Stucco 'Taco Bell, (measurements she- to stucco sing) 1.6n W • 881.9 1 j &71.40 It \ � 980.53 ♦/ / �G�0.90 \ %�\ MI.l7 Taco -- ---- Bell-- ---- -- Top ut DI hydrant loroted u Saubdbls M11. ut 3210 SOUTNOALE CIRCLE 62 int aoubrest p1 wgMnl p ,., roma,. D.O. - 833.4D I— u°r LEGAL DESCRIPTION: `�ju bre umrrio u5 9 urface C4.0GRADING .64 BBD.Sry 00� / gl% x 0.96 89/.52 v o 6 rc 5 x16 Z &1 .76 c/p�yt 1D 'A n C3.0 h [w N4.nexrx TACO SELL EOIN& MN / DA.I.redby /A 4' 13 1 Pa krn seal s \m� ;i .ca �rc to R II block � I � shed\ ` J 11 A 11 WCL A••a Cleles. In D ID a0 JB t ��N rJ]APNIL SCALE fN TEE) DA�]EO Sp1Et�xEX 18. z�1�2 PPOvipED�By DT a R E B DD pANY. l BENCHMARK- -- - -- --- Taco -- ---- Bell-- ---- -- Top ut DI hydrant loroted u Saubdbls M11. ut 3210 SOUTNOALE CIRCLE 62 int aoubrest p1 wgMnl p ,., roma,. D.O. - 833.4D I— E.NA. MN 55035 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DEMOLITION PUN IeuIwNpCie aPai.rb, rl��elpsY, xe. luy. C4.0GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN PLAN CE.O UTILITIES PUN CBA STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PIAN ee.w m•mn C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS n C3.0 SURVEY LEGEND: [w N4.nexrx TACO SELL EOIN& MN ® Catch basins DA.I.redby Border. Foods Hydrant 965 Deu, ur Ave NoM GPltlen VA!" MN 55027. E Light standard NAw AddenasaApN 4.2014 -n -.-m_ Gas main 5425 Soona Avv N. Naw Nap&,MN 5S428 -D Sanitary sewer c1VELENGWEERiNO drDr�IT- -aD-Dp- Storm sewer .r-� -r Watermain I�P.ra.aN.wrpbr,. �,�„r.wpnanw �nwrr.wwwllN�N°.I Overhead wires apron: �s.O.W ------- Underground electric = NTEPtANRENEW 3x10. INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C1 'D SITE PUN C2.D EXISTING CONDITIONS PUNNaw BbKdblg 03.0 DEMOLITION PUN N1.2 238-:1,547 SF DEMOLITION C4.0GRADING AND DRAINAGE PUN PLAN CE.O UTILITIES PUN CBA STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PIAN ee.w m•mn C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS n C3.0 [w N4.nexrx TACO SELL EOIN& MN g/ X676.6 tc -- S 89°47'36"-. E 129.3 \- - enA _1ce (r_sx^2 d4o y!' :- - d7e - _ -_-- on con OI s5P' - nc e e cur - �a\O3' ��' - - eeT. 8g01130 I a7\ 3 Park,ng sca//s \�r�ea-gnt tc ° is I I I !' �I 60.27 / I mbrtum,nolv891'surface II egos/ I „Pal:oa 631.74 /GI t) GG��GG t79.4 79.3 %e tc tc III j neo / 63.3 / .64 Curb �- 631.40 I I" 42.4 c nhole 9.4(5\ / , BB 1.253 ' wtlod wa! door sill B ! m=87923 / e 881.9 v=872.03 1iT� e7 / \{sr9^ c o nuc r e t ea top parapet I I (µ 896.9 I �. 861.57' 5.7 nr on tic da bo. 013 ` ` G c 669.9 / -3tory Stucco v I ,.Taco Bell" v n Boaz . I I I N \l } } ADA parkng srgn `� ( asurement. shown to stucco srd�ng) L I I I W 5.7\door srrl l I I 80 1W ' I 32.1 831.3 a Z2I i�11 8O \ I 0 879.76 I 88 9/ 0.76. .: -�t•1 ,=-e /.50 BB 1.57 r-- � i } I M0 5.3 / / g 0.90 } BBl.l7 jF I P wer -_i 1 c br tumrrl ou9 s ur fa ce 579.44 - �p. /"0 x O 61.84,/ 6141, 4OJ� .660.96 I i/ BBl.52 II I� Z I MO. 76 Gg< InCY) It, /4a�g°� �� 831.76 Q`ezl)61 W Itt679.32 V9h Pk / i2o �re I S r,. I 6�D1P ` yI/A i Jl Pa k,ng stal s m- y rc - - - � block -6 �YCP b sP a�rtg BB 1 c rtcrete rb 88!.60 I shed ` I ------ rc66z.o5 - sl'el B wood fence !res south of Ime' - I �"" c'-`- -'- - �'� 6'6r' SIB9°41'42" W 145.00 3Bz. -- �+) /a g/ I tonere curb} BB o fo zo 30 PPAPHfC SCN.0 M i'EC( �tm�s �g@rtN9moxs.Ysi2 vnwiom`ei BENCHMARK: IP nut er lydnnl Icmbd en 5°mw0ie Cmie m v.a4onfO: eea�eo niu•o' pnp•Hy rem... LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SURVEY LEGEND: ® Catch basins C2.0 Hydrant t Light standard -m-.- _ Gas main -e Sanitary sewer -»-»- Storm sewer - Watermain - - Overhead wires ------- Underground electric INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C1.0 SITE PUN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PIAN C3.0 DEMOLITION PIAN C4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PIAN CS.O IIT,unES PIAN CS.O STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS WCL R�1�( Taco Bell 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA. MN n Devel°Ped by: Border Foods 9.5 0..., Ave N.. Golden Valley MN 55427 New padres. a. °1APm 4.2014 5425 Sone Ave N. New H.P.,MN 55,129 m°emule l -- I CML ENGMGERMG SITZ DCSIGN vw rmrepn M nv...nmm 4o.u. NL28. 28 Seals -1.547 SF EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN rp. C2.0 .�� TACO BELL EDINA MN A N GRAPNEL SCALE IN FEEF W PIAN RASEDED 019 N2R-rt4vRA'nDED 6! IAT SUVEYS c0lIPAM, IN4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BORDER FOODS,INC. CONTACT: BARB SCHNEIDER 955 DECATUR AVENUE NORTH GOLDEN VALLEY. MN 55427 PH (763) 489-2970 FX (763) 4B9-2971 SITE DATA: TONING: MD -3 PUxNm =mum OR- 3 PPOPOmD IISE: RFmMIPaM mrN ORNE-TWRpIAx ORD. LOT ARd IS.- ]' Fr. OR Dr. MRm rOTAL1 UXAwRM01PRINIr - (CFA) 1,117 SM Ft. M WI 4UD COVENCD FLA. 0.O55 p4T�aDm«F='vO A p- 13y3 50. R. P[ (e>N i la M MWnw2 MLN exlN PRC11 p� 1� F �AtFA�NT 14,155 B0. Ff. PUD- / IaNpI Nv2ARM15 MFA 71,11 . -MOOD UNDSCAPE MFA: ]DB2 50. R. PERCEN UMDSUPE AREA: 20.61 UAF7 / la+mt ARCHITECT. WCL ASSOCIATES, INC, CONTACT: DEAN MADSON 4931 W. 35TH ST, STE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 PH (952) 541-9969 FX (952) 541-9554 PARKING DATA: SITE PLAN NOTES: GENERAL NOTES: w 1. ALL NUDISM N4 SHOWN ME M FACE OF CURB. EDGE OF SEIDIALX OR EMmIOR I. PRIOR TO STARLING PPmMN� 1A .X40 14 1MN F DM) 1BN4 OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. REFER TO ARLXREc1URAL MR SMS FOR SMLDINO DIMENSIONS ANO SPECIDOATIONS FOR uxxOw O< o n. MMPS, VEITIFY THAT ALL M BEEN or.NEO. N Pnr14a4 T P COICAM APRONS AND STOOPS. OWN LINT' THE DI 11//33Nilaa�: qNS I P.F mac aNR US awN / 3) a 1 . n SMN 2. TACT! SHALL BE USED ON BINMINDW EDGE PRIOR M PAMHNG. MATCH EXITING DODOES 3. ALL MONOPOLE SIOEWAENS ADAICENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE SEPARAIm WRH A r.. PLANS AND OTHER AUFMIFIES.. SWIM. BE M n m EIIPANSDN INN. 4. DOMFOXFON SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDOR RMUREMENIS FOR tDHONG. IRAOARON, ANO SPmRFAlDN3 D _ PmMN4 OA,N�Rw SHeY bniM W:Ne ] VHiPMaMENU BOARD, COMMUNICATION PmESTAL, ETC WIM OWNER PRIOR TO PAWN' OF THE LOCAL GP/ RET:OMMENOATON S b4NNW Dnlnm shell bnIIN uew: 3 VaNgn 5. CONRRACTDR SHALL VERIFY LOGDON OF THE MENU BOARD AND COMMUNICATION WRH OWNER PRD. TO PLACEMEN. REDWOOD COISMJ PEDESTAL A=CC BM ROME SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM ACCESSIBLE STALLS TO BULDNG xFLICT SHALL TA NOTED OTHERWISE I dTRANCE (SEE AMC WR MMONNNT BUR ONO µENTER S CED REOEEMEMBY.BOL aERPEDESfRNN SMR'' E W PER NSTRUCT ACCBLE RAMP PER A'NW AND NNDOT STANOARpS. 7. WESSI BEI J. SIIE CLDARINC SIN SETBACK w w RmWUNxR B. PRP/DE CONTRASTING DELECTABLE --0 STOP. 5 RESPON9BLE R COORMINONC WRH ME MARSHAL FOR POS14A CONDUCTORFO L UNpERCRWND ALL. 4,SITE CRAMNG SWL LOCADMC BMBfffitO EBBBDfi OF BE LANES. CURB MMKINC AND SDNAGE F NEEDED. 9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FDR DEAD N AND REIXWAL OF ALL EDSBNG THESE PIANS AND BET FORM IN 1HE iRMrt ]]' 2O STRUCURES LINT RIIFAFERE R1M HEW WORK AS 114- 10. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO BE RRICATEU. RESPONSIBLE FOR WOLFING OR UNSU SIDE ]S IO �1. ALL NOV UFLIFES MU m BE UNDENGROUN0. R.9DMAUIS - BE CONSTRUCTED WRH CROSS SLOPE OF 5URE ANMATERAU A COMPACRON REP REAM ]] 13 1}X WIIN MNSrMEM t/- 0.5%. SDERAI(S WILL BE INSPECTED AFTER CDNSVRUC1ION. ANY 51DdALK EXCEEDING 2.OX CROSS SLOPE WILL NEED TO RE BRNANU 1, MCdSo PERFOR.EO. VERBY CIVIL ENGINEER: CIVIL ENGINEERING SITE DESIGN, LLC CONTACT: SCOTT DAHLKE 118 EAST BROADWAY ST., PO BOX 566 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PH (763) 314-0929 www.ciVilesd,com SITE LEGEND: 11FAW OIIIY BIIIIIMNOIIS P VENOM eoxoRETF vMuldr CONCRETE DR- APRON 8112 CMB AND CURER -I-D 8812 W118 AND CURB TIP -BLIT DO9IBIC CII11B AND 01111ER ® vARKND court ♦ .t 1PAFRC MRECIDH ARR019S INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C1.0 SITE PIAN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN CJ.0 C4.0 DEMOLITION PLAN GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PLAN CB.O C7.0 STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PUN STANDARD DETAILS El L WCL s IN SHALL AA ... I1Ie N. Inc. DREWED ALL PENN R NO THE PANS REM" A M D OF O HE 0< 1CALLY DR sF11LL SAN . REm.AL OF n m :E WRN1 IMEgOAON� F. wt DR. D ^° iS ALL SUBMT l." D. RADE REAS NAVE FIGTNNS REPDR . $HUNN ON fia n,P F� Taco KEY NOTES NNMNWS PATMENr AS Q iPAallo uOr MY) T>t Anpu9 A�ccREWnAi m�il.s Y WWR�DT tua [ b5F 0.t >l Dd91Y. IODX FOR MORFGTE B TL 1001 OF 1M alAR5PIl1 O2 (•) ?%.- CURB A COWER. NW OT -I YOt ]Y3]A 9NFMY g D.- OR xeAOr N81 NC UMULL -EA- (D BMT (17 WMGRCIE OUIFIAM WIIB a: COMER. (IP_MW ROOTING. I- 2111 IYX ]Y2M SLPFMiM _ENI UCdM NNDM 2181 MO W.)M NANUIE PIACEYdT. (D D F O Fa mu f CU S ]ADM LGICR&SL O01 TAO I @ /m1DN10 NYd(mNm. PlAtddT DR WOOT 24m YR ]Y]T WAHINE PUCEMDrt. SOILS SPmRGRMS SUPGSmC LstFD &[ORG70N4 O B• CONCRflE PAVEMENT W/BYI•-/1D/lU N.W: Icasi. m B 1Y IN MR M• CUBS 1 N�ANWL FUANFNf. SWISISSVLCRLTTg4726A S�FERSFNYOE ABV.S IMEO 1 DOW R6t R. ]2L O MYWT 6Pr YTOO -I-. UN! 1pANEOCWS NIM gSaUUOFS ACT vNDU RWNBUNSOS. RNddc[ O WRR1LL SYXBpL W ACCfSLBM1T'-NNIE UlR PNM. ' O PMKNO 1ON 0- /N A7 -M AND R ..... CfxWA SOx ON MRNmALL M ICON PFR 11FRAL COMMCD0. NWxF Ox 1• COxCRC1E 00- 11 OOA1aA SX[m. O ARfd MFA SFF -i, PUN. Q SUNOa LOOP. p3MLLm m 90N cMFAM. mNRd nI1X ARMNECDML PIA,O. Q TRAN90AIFA PAD x cdmuL coxIRAADR. wmAu PEa umm mwAxr vEm'XAmra OPNM A' DOE SOLO SIxFE - N1rL O PALM 1MIIO MORS - NIDIL O M N• IYCII IEriFRS _MME O PALM T4' MOE SOLO 91.1E - NH1C O IXSIING PYLMI POLE YIIIN DNATm SOX C10WQ A RRWN INAND PLACE O NiNDAlIOXS OFNERN. CODRIAll1RPN - IWN�OLTgN S NN 0.PNIERS MT��IO O mM.D POST BOLLARD. 9m OmM SHEET. O CMXREIE ORIENAY AP- PER OO S1INORDS USE 0' CONCRUF. O OOW1 0.N0 OFICOt1NRACDF t0 c00RwuA•fEs41BE %ACED &C1 t0 BWt ON I) ' SIGN I) TA NOr ERCP' S. O FDSN --E. SFE MC - PLIAS FOR DIMS O bRAUr MO RNWD -D ORNIWGR Af O.NENAY M.a AY NN, 2O MDM FROM UP W MmnKN�p REP -Em - F MV-dd1f NUdA1p8 AND CSS I.- OUtt DROYNgS PAVEYFM. QCWO wdal0 ] FELT NOC NM CONCRETE 9PLLWAT Yv2Y). FORM RMTWLF AT GLINTED w sPaLwr. 9PNLwAY coIXRO[ SmTDx m BE A1x caxcRErt IX✓we Alp OM rR LXNRdD RTCE TD RFMMf N RACE. O BOE RAMI. Sm PRDIFCI SPECRXAIARS. O w�ALL�ia�L C, �R � C pl MRI�OIiNd �FENAWI 9�.T DA' CMINd REMO06 O PANE 12• ROE SMA INION IF SMPAI - DRE vWr az[NIm�MN'MAn6mMCw LCf�ms¢ MMmmI�PPjANg• Ipq OATON Bf Dd[M,LL WNRMCIML pET4R ONOIR RUNG. PSM1Am M SOLI CDIRAM'. i010TOMD11 m CEXER4. CNORAAIOR. VDNY SRE - O-7 AMNrmr. SFE ARONRCI RAID FOR DOOM}. 3210 ROUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA MN 55135 D --.ped Dy. Border Foods 985 D -W, Ave N.M GeMan Vaney MN 55427 Naw Mdna3 as of April 1, 2014 5125 Beene A- N. NewH .01455428 CIVILEN_GDJEERING SITE O�IG6 W:.u1aNI_..NUa,N wEPLA Naw Bundli NI -2B, 28 SIM: 1, SF SITE PLAN M.N 01.0 w TACO BELL EDINA MN •a�V(`�II'7f IS��ig BITUMINOUS .S C onvn7l- , nn `n 24 -..,3.!'A.Sw axe•=noi,o`wwur xy l n CDtppau TO lerpm Pitz ire, z mxmwm slaw wu6 TxE «41a.slPx Apwrs a ,r-6• Ilc A l�rra a..�410. CONCRETE PAVEMENT Gf lIn IT�" I cet"tloP„ II17'"`� I � ung iie a,s�N re alsx P:ppr^�ou10' ,. Iv.l we NN sxlu crosael ro Iwor srce ora, swu. saes ort wxn.mx Aswrs Ar s• -p• on • 4Ale mon-qr-Mr. CONCRETE SIDEWALK SITE LEGEND: x 1i1.9) amps emr ermmx ' px I/I.1( Imra q9r newnall AIF/x rxpros[P Rw' ow¢mll My StgK P IB 20 � waPxge otos yN rEcy orm � Buten 011 iuo Er �Y�I�x lqr sus ns IaUNWuf. Ixo. ° BENCHMARK: Tap m! of nydronl Ipcplatl pn SauNed4 Ciml. v( 52 r..! aouUw.al of o Inxest Drocomer El..rion 883.40 Peet panY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: C.WI- Ivntl Suety Ne.-. ....... cranny, Ixn,wsvly. M RAI RIDI •^ pOTES- ,. 5p.ilicvliona ppPlicobla Ivr this proj.cE Current 1pndaro a acincolipna lar Edim. NN, arra Uw -11 Minmd.11 Deponmenl pf -At- It - Sherif II.d ,1 ...-Can _u . ontl v NPDES r•qu'uwn•n!a acp[ wM1e mvdinva M Ih,n 2. OSIAPcI dpcumenta. HA rsquirymen4 ..It be r.Ph., rpt ell work on Phi. project. J. Ina Lmtmclvr shall n 2-1 bopher 51a1e Dna Calf 46 Mon Dfior to pny Dan p -BOD -25z -n66;) 4. The Cording Coolmebr YM1ell p riry a` Ixaliem pne aavah er pnaery%d EIYti. wiU unity cvmponive pfior a comiruclivn, v vnmsdiately mDly the ngine of LonlrPl bc oryona �rdlle4 5. A SAI Wct•tl. a vpprrcebla, es •,quvm,0 below: A sqt I'ropa. B. Rook Comtruc4on D,IAPnce. C. DamblRbn E. D. 5 r_5114 .1 v lca Pn (gAPding). ePatl oM motto or sod b(nve notes on b M�p�an). dt smol �wm Ip n T Monsruc4d by IM1v Cmit.p�g Cvnlm loop DAPtecl Pdja_A property. M P M B. Erosion PA m mlanance shell pv P.riarmad by - CAPtling Conlmclor, boa bva•ed es �er Uv la,lrecl Dm umvn4 directed bybelm Englmer, loilawvtl q necaa w naloAPlion .1 etwb.a orae. TNa -A, by Indtlonbl to Ins gmallq comma. 9. Tna Crotllnq Conlroclpr yMll .M1atlule Iha rags anginea to facinble canigcalivn eI ptl conlAPllM 114 in b timely fmnion. Demily testa Mall moa Us lotlovinq: 0. ratNn Ue pilar J' of elnets, Ua CAPdinq Cmlrocl. enol! WiY¢, appAPv,d �^ Not an wi1Nn If 1 Us ap4mum o4turo cpnbnl as donned by Ih 5 dartl Procbr T.t-ASTM: D -6g0 with romppct4n meelinq 1605 e slpntloro Proctor Dvnalry mil nvl .ac.Mng Uia cempsclian M mpro lean R maRH 96Fvnbndertl D Damllyebenalba wptNn S'.S PI Us loplimun mo Wro fent, GAP61gr (olsmntts anell W D.1'. B. Cmtling IWamrcvy ler lhv1-h".1Pr the silo Moll 10. NI eroos of mWlobW WI. found Iyyod tlescr2•tl above Ual pnno! be ContAPctora alb. bcat�Yib�nnlhsyR�tl �qln ,CAP I; se preosapM prvNdsdi� inlarmpti.n as b Ua"v Yee onE bcolion. . ino CmtlinD eonlroebr YhWI Pmeb. -1- aroinpg, . Ih• a4 al ell It,. 12. I.bftTM1s %iN C-AtC...Nngbgtaft Am Wclbn entrance e1b1 be pwformeq eepeciwlH al 13. All allPh.Wlvm.v oll barymwm ofcgmpvltibn. I4. A6 PrvPmva .larogom oro et Rev fm nlsss h.n4• mod. 15. All aroaipn canba I.., manage Pmcn.aa -11 ba pn Lity alpntloroa. 6. 5loreq. al ma4do4 or equipment shall not P. -.d wtlhin I .1p r6ghl-el-Nay. 1T. Any atoakp1. 0 oa bile must ba vlgbinzed alter 14 dp per NPG regaolion. 1& won sin roma or eD,eY m.lhetla to PAPP.! Iron lMl pro to mmpLa INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C1.0 SITE PLAN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C3.0 DEMOUTON PLAN C4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PUN C5.0 STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS - WCL Aaaoelatea. Inc. Taco Bell 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55435 Pp'E�'O \FGG �GC� N SqR� GGa DPy.I.ped by. Border FOOds 865 DeaW1 Ave Nort, GOMen Valley MN 55427 Naw Address as of APO 4,2814 5425 Ibone Ave N. Naw Hop..MN 55428 CIVIL ENOMEERING BATE DCSIGN IIwW vvbvwsh Wnged4wnv iwN�ueww�avmr�Wmsi� ham. uwvsww,awuomw slw.w 5..�>llw- New eundulg w-za, ze 9e.1a:1,efy sE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C4.0 -� TACO BELL EDINA, MN J' ' � mrc�ete cu 675.e5 .77 - - - - I.9.WCL S89°47'38"E13 - ' CB- • • BW PRECAST NEENAH CAS11N0 R -26 51M ____ ____ \ I I - •� 111 i "B' o. GS '560 �Y ;a cry 111 'E(W)-875.74 (1 M DL) \� IE(ss1m+ �-._. (2d• iH) TRASH I . �, IE-B7z.D0 / e 4 we Ne, LED c°NDurt 1 �. n' "AI II I I SITE LEGEND: w % app \ \ 1Rr-24• PERFORATED , I (TO BE INSTNlED ATA GFOTEMIL�EE SOCK OPD. WfM I I z IlI.N 0 10 LD 90 D OP 107 M) ENDS WITH /4 REHM (ttP) y/ Pl' Awa` I I NW artnx WAPN(C SCALE !N lLEF wzmww CB -3: 54• DW PRECAST I I I I I>4 V •� - Z9.9 1 y ^ 00'-24• PERFOMTED <� 79. A. SSS/// DWL-WALL HDPE PPE ASO / I- CEWEXBLE MEIt n• Ntole� ' I �� 7_ Pnyl / N91gn FF .6e s v\' TACC Ett ItJw I 2a SEATS 1847 AAPPNNRO%BMT E VATON •5)230.IAM ATERSOME SE-E 5 T0-1tl" . `• LlL_ NEENAH wS11NC R-3057 �v_d PE -990.35 I I I 4 pp-pO-- v1cYWim m ¢wAtvx TIE PV N BASED °N 60MEY wr°RWION 874.BO (24. 0110 „ N !11.11 BATEAlEIMY'E"0"EOYv1Ax,.11 PADAOEO n f(S)-B7A00 (24• IN) I III 8 I./N 66 MP w IE- 72M SU vevrve[I noir vrrtmDx Aw s°v[ 1Y d1f 1tP9 BENCHMARK: _________ __________.ay_`` I I I I_ pee I•>- «vo[m Gww wwl Too w[ m Bydmnl Nwtvtl °n svulnaN. ew ut - . _.- °c y'. p `•YReAT 9°'m 5p^x[ IM. -It t e_ -MAO' 1 1 avmwel prop.Ay mn. �v \ °y>I v� I I I h ' rvpofm r[4 Elwvl'wn -883.10 Mt J ,�. Taco FE=8 i II ����� pDwDwmxm wx« Ww LEGAL DESCRIPTION: +aap, I II w AElr - ODNFSIR`ly-._-__ _.__._� -- " tIT ---.-� _ « __---- -- JwcL•....._. _. ywuFNv, _tames _ - --_- IDP-B CM I I I °fi SEWERE512E Au0 ELEV.I I I 92103W1HDAL 5,135CIRCLE CE E' w..- _s II I II I FAINq MN 55495 vencn NE wwnrmn wrniw"w r.v 9v paves DEPTH OF IBS w.RK EN05 �•""�V ""� CONNRACTI.NEO COMPLY WDH ALL CTIY PERMIT > ?• I WIM /4 RE&Vt (TyP) 98 lF - 1.0• Cu ER TO ENISDND 6• VCVC9AVnAR1' SEWER TYPE N wPE 0 SERVICE AT APPROXIMATE ELEVATIM 873.0 WITH 1. /+ ' ].5' MIN. PDEPTH WAT�1PIPE SIZE, MATER" CMNECTIDN. -,NO PIPE INFORIMTION lb � I _ .Iw' ® PRECAST MATE cow -MR IX FOLD VEmtt LCwMATER"AND ELEVMNIN PRIOR ' 4@:H CASTING R-nell .� TO WDRK. CONFlRN PROPOSED INVERT AT BUROnnG O RE -el. 0 CW BE ACHIEVED. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONfACf I lE(M-e]4.Bo (x• ou0 ENGINEER BIMEDWTIlY P ELEVATWN OF MWING I 8 N-B7D SUMP SETMCE CONFLICTS WITH PROPMED BNERT. IFv�f CDMBACTOR TO COMPLY WITH ALL ERY PERMIT 'P D REOVIRUENTS. ENGTBGC WATER da AC SERVICE CURB I ni9.9' STOP VALVE L^ alA- T Y .W 1 lai awe BENDS AND wSEWER CLEAM Vrr souE,7 0l !me'•� T(�-, q/.+. g eWRH GSTINO BSHA�WEM.. - SELECT Fnl lr MIN MTML D D BACNm D HAuxcwuc BEDOINO pp® 1® W 1. BEBONC SNALL BE NATIVE SOUS MATMAIS MEETING sCECT M R AR BORROW WAOT SPEC 3149.28. 2 COMPACT MOM STANDARD PROCTO!. 1 SLIECT FAL PIACENMT SHALL BE FREE IF tANCE MElOi (r.) AMD sNAU. BE PULED qz suxoARp�aRzrnL� CWPACIFD To BEDDING DETAIL 23.3' a a II I i p DENERAL UF- NDTEs: 1. Sp«inceww apprb lar Nk pn)«L• comm flanavm .p«Irc°tbu Ior IM GN Ir FdM. NN Ind a0 Wnwmb 11"!>0 R I I I • (n Dspprlmanl of 1-11 end MPw rwuiromank nvepl wMn mveilisI by Nese I—- evcunwnls. 3 '. 4. r I 2 D5W n9vlremenb c It be l:Iww Ior on - I.R e _'8 I I 3. Ore Clnlwclvr fMB w0y •Ovp- Sbk Dw EIB'4B an Ink D boon I- b I, a«Uvn (651-4-2« 1• PVC IRMwTION COMMIT I I I 1 -BM -252-1165 vol sial..) NSTNLED AT A I` _q_ 4. Ore Cvnlwvbr .hml verily ell Ivca- ane a Bwn IF underq,°wd uURU.. wNh uWly evmwnlef prbr b aro -- OEPW . 187 HARK FNM I cm.b«D: (abml v:er, -In waver, water, avium 911, h1m hp , N«W , .b.). Intl enmeColvN n°Uly Bre '63 WBH /1 RFBNt Er II any canlwb. q and vlbr eonelrueOln. (JyP) I Pt :ve/ S. TM Cmkwkr ... pro .1 vE M 0 m 1.. and bombe b Ill: proper b«Ibninq anon w"3nKY Al rot d a ,Bq .Iructurw .MU Oe vuppcee by IM Comr«br ve waif ,«bfnlll 1e No contnC4 \ 6•-58' BCH 40 j I i 8. lir. cenbacbr MoD Nm.mll.N nmlly 1M En Nser el an)' camcck wlwem nblinq utC11e4 Intl Urs PrvPawd PVC BENOs ANO - PERFO TED I I c°nlrvcl'Pn. 1M FngNs« x111 cwMNlb esti!! Ins UUGy Camwry N 9wewn b «lxmiw W new for rebwllm of BUN. -WNL HOPE PIPE WITH I Ne ..bl INSTALL SANRANy I boli uW''y J A.ERELLEVdOUr -'Qy4 CEOTEXIILE SOCK 0 0.M 1 I 4 I ). EWeOy wniUwn h anro to menMkv ern. We °e en olmM ken5nae b/ tM Cvnhvclar dantl Nn� Nv5 be I I I.A.1 b ,.f,,An wior 1- wn by I Cen WIBm IwG MI— v -m, uq ,g -d u1Min will b. wumee n:e been cawee by In° E.-Cb4 em/ rwein «seeery ohm! M wrlomwd I j II II B. rinaneP�nala gwvm Iw °eouml�nle eenJ oi' fess. 11 V - 6• PVC BEH CB -4: 48• DW. PRECAST 1 I I 9. TM Conlr«lor fhaN covNiMb wlln ws I«II jw .._ b W. permib Intl mebr I« -, I-.. AA vewcblw I PIPE 0 1.Of. NEEN.W _. R -SM) I I I k eMn be I...nW b Ne --4 1w 19 Olpowl m Mt wvler Mb CnyL evnibry wv Mkm M T RC-an.90 I U Xj cLbnrlbocM .nae nm awnle gots wNe. « hydwntc m Un WN'e star vuppN Wp IE(N)-974.00 2f' _U I 10. 1N EanMabr MIG noliy the CNy Fngmaer and IM Pni«t Dgiwn 48 Mon prior b ebH'mg rrork « Iv nwlwa \IE-8)20It SUTAP , I P � ✓ >p PO ` I 11. qCea«nabuN.Setivn yr N wvelem b m.w"r sn-1ot =ht, eebN, Intl vm &V,/ r«t kenn9w9ulnd by NPDEB perMl « w ApwirwP W m. OJty L"p dwbvge, = bee« wiln = " mnlrw and uxA. Pmmlbn r«ulntl by Inc NPDES WAmil p- r OVNenne0. cl pmMUm vlwtl N Nablled wilnb 48 Mow Ilbr I I I I L? 1 eoMWelivn. Umwe e0«iR« m ba pbw ar : a bk Nm m tM B'ie wmL orty GmDonry eubeM, SICM., nnr Iabrk .b. n«.w m r n I ry to o«o p I INc coon be wHamwd as i«kmld b ftm_ I1 I 12 1N ClnlrocW MOG prwwv IM Drobcl Ins maMn aM nwnunenls A.,Wr IN vubd FBI el Uw bw. 1 I 13. TM Cvnbacbr pn1 wnwu4 Ue eaB. mginser Iv 1«Mote wrtillmwn v1 m cINr111N Ink to v bneN Iwnlen. - A MrulN Ink .Me b lobo In III [r«wnee It bwNne Ie ewarminee by Ne Erpiwer or Ne ' prsembl'W.. 79:5 1 Hp IN u.4w r If cloak. pdwl. mace IM wm P bb. CorNroel9r .NII 5M 1 vwmeed emlo test In wlbin IS It, ..m ..; clm.nt Io Oenn« py be StmwN Pr«Ivr Twt-p, 0W8 Mib IBM I S 95 4 G, EnJ ° 1'42" W 145.00 nose^. 4 TW 882.0 __ Osmly Inc ml exeeMrq eomp«Ibn by mon INn IL Bek. Ns wwr X. �omp«Ywn .hon mwl 9sx. Gnelrq bbm«sv SNAP N 0.1•. ^ 6W 801.0 I 14. 1M Osmr vN0 P% Ar pG IwBw of b wmD«wn. Arry ar.w .Nan 112 b meal Um Ibw slonelM coil! bs ' s' { , I 114 ylvlerlawirYc. fM111p bianm wtll o eminimawin W i5 tlul v- W. I6. Camract« mwll prwl0e I.mPwI'Y Uvlw mnlnl N wmpwnw wM MN/DOT •b -7 Trams Clnbal 2vn. LIy b, 1). CvlMitreetw ehNl e. rn11polukM i �wm ctta0anlol"th.0d pN w wet9q .lube Mkd In Iniv pbn pries w IM Drewry a1 a yllVi ms e:um ba COetl"ge' el` Dpinwr and. U 0- -11 rot M rnwrrcibk Tor .4 S«np°ncln lvuM IB. Eity Mpwlbn b Apu've0 1« Ura mnibry •ewer one water ewes•. cwmvalb:n 19. Cvnbwtw Iv wmpN rilh : Aswbbry a9enry "'A wn6Bow I,' permile obtbANd by Ir A, °rtl for permb ablanw by oewml cm"Cwr. 20. AN wort pM metl Drip m°lefwle ww II, wwtrucl'en If m'dilin muM cm[«m Iv 1N Wy vl RiChnsle SI°ml«d sp«incur and BetaTx 21. Cm=11 IF u15C, SDR 35 vv m emHeolsm mobMl IIA wMory .ever aeK e. 22. LmINm pip:ed .Ow. service and wal.r mein .mks bwww w .bwtbna Mlm maclwNeal pone. 23. Rel« lI obpaiwl ane lynnnq pbw Ior COMNI Me I. I«awn Ior me: board Inc light p STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION ZONE STRUCTURE AND INFILTRATION. ZONE SECTION NEW SECTION NEW CB -1 AND CB -2 CB -3 AND CB -4 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CLD SITE PUN C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C3.0 DEMOLITION PUN C4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PUN GILD STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PIM! C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS Gp� l taped by. Border Foods 9135 MIA Ave North Gowan Valley MN 59427 New Md... es or ApO 4,2014 SQS SII.- N. Naw Hope,MN SU28 HCl" ENOWEERWG TT 'SM.MO ' A«rr P1w w1:Iw ver Ww«A�w Epiv.urwlw.arvn"�a r elPu.v �ibJAe. PWIREVIBN OIM.2014 New Bulking NH29.2a 8.ek:1,M] eF LITILMES PLAN w C5.0 uwNl.we:n TACO BELL EDINA, MN nDNdWNmm t .�ryr Iv eM msetm(IeE p ' ronlmM welvv, ro . E1C.) anou es tlalw ie iwl cr`OA a wwtl N vmWelw 72e1 L 2375 epxilca!'ov.ry staCiQ.Xnw°!o by pm dw n mpX nn wln Nnpoi d !mm gmax^o n mkM slabalz.tl P. P. 1bv.e q eery, .r w pmp.wtl .n Gd y awp+ IoIpr nr bot In . TNI ervinw <eMllivn vt weamw. ID cn`enimclw bn� b< w<pgnalwv w Ivm Tom We<nvv, tlw wnwwas In >mry vul9 x.r`TI° � n • Ncltlrnbl le Ina 9Aaw° al 5. Cntan�m<Yinq�l Q t1 ` `M0 y awsl`m w`Ivtl pn � b n Mv� ncbmud rw p d a er Ins ane vl aecn ro,airna"g e a ONPPEVEMION NO)£4 al pnp:rytoir-a1 s eM over emoh +Inwifvu `Iwviai �a l"I M awoewd vavpw, w;nl, en MwNew eu npa b nW ea ew r Eawrn0l rwnln9 .! wcla yr by th .a a� ,. N.Po ngmnm.nn .a<avt •non mwmr a 2. — re.vinm.nt. MII b. Idl.xed fw .. r .n Wt. Onlwt. 5. me C111— a 11 Miry-C.Dher S.te one C.1, 4a nears pdw a. T uoa�ny cminclm..hiCUX2v: Let;ni. .dorsa me .w6pn..r underymund utigtira x;N u1;X1Yn penis Drior U `o^ ..a vc.<tl. ..a .nm.dm.ry odiy In�°Fngineer .i y ..nM.ta. E. ` I t It.Mell gwem Iw waemente v 1.1 dimenY.M. 11 be°r.nslruclad prmrnt. `lhs sl.rt of taw.v.b.nml DraPer4ea vele et aero ar 9mding 7. DwipP wnlr.l m.tnlen.nce .holt bt, perl.mled by Ne Gr.dne dmw<I.r, wa ww ea Delon. Cmba<e WMammey .r a .r c etl .by Ue Wner, dleree y .l neceaaory na erel,.n .r & Th. Crnfng c.ntmct.r it.I provide Dwltive dmi1.g1 .n the it, Gmd10 tvl.mncw .hall be I o' r. MN audac Cr�ng tolerances Iw !h. nmaNtle.I Ill. it, .hull Ce UV.. 9. ins Cmdng Cmlroelar MIi Neep Pwlic Inela, yy.INng I-. and 4wal N.ye c r .f w^I antl amore, pay d—., t the .mlmcgen en wnc aX pe Derr.rmed, eapwi.11r .t the eM .1 socM1 tloy's wrke C ROeA71RG11 C 47n nd sE D avast en G °a anwi+ I wbh`wawV�auew'v ..earney Wb. r`edr 2. i ry grountl°�wx anvil pe°MnDp," T I.d mn Iia°sbe MM v0 IMaoc `XT Typr t rMl br apd�w vt x 1 Popes..1 nay .w aI .roalen wawal. et too °Ibe/pc faelwor anon e� NnDar.ryw t D- D-xD one 1.1.x0D z svwnmolbn nrwww. uunllm zs7s a. o _ ' w �,e mlldr Nw.mbw t bw rM Wm a brona0walneM cr 9r"wrw Non Y'� da wr. ar s S. www wa° tMt ee wl b+cwm I.rah wgrbtbn rhea b FinavwniebloNnt fhuY1ep� ina°MibC in v+ee envy rbh I— wrte<. abwa e Sk IV w ds.prr. CP SGIE cmronw M.M. anou tq by tnr �inNliaxi no rwnwnlor romlgn�e�l wwl bqw Inan t/x'twW IM Dt 1a <empbbLL lbNwwMr n,Ynl d . emegw. mew ..dm.nl e�w�a: ,.pe1r I.M. w u Mare: „< arlW: inlrl ro YVMa meear reelryi �°wm INn )x cr ribl d�mrr M •°goes: aumrlon 'a`aur1° e�ep�.l hOV.de<w wnN zillw.;,ra;`;.I°9 reKKea�er b Crgtlr"w�� pww "I ns rrdwvd -P11, rnm rt aeempwn e. 1 +aelmml nW` Mbn W w b n ne irNe appmm`wVdobl `e .e w'I.bu.eq^gwone ryLItm1%11r b IM :n r'roe:., w Iwt .rw, u. ep:a'.a'm M1w ww nw. ns M Bala ee uw I�1n�v Wi^9 .rw na. Men +'a�(a) memM, 1 Tn 1 �bpinp� e�av lien k • e•w+w wrow Mm f • owes. .n w mpwery vprwlbn Hle W lef Inr nawn+I.N party for eresiw <enlml c gnaEPM. CobndROE m BC .ERFNINfO 4.7 —,977- 076 877- 078 T Mr�am r vnao m ROCK CONSTRUCTION)ENTRANCEDETAIL amw.vMge,n :.Na..�d=�w�wl.� SILT FENCE DETAIL fiRAPHlC SCALC IN FC£7 'M Kit toif� DRDNDWiBY BENCHMARK: 82°f..l e.a evwLl.1-1. eat S. ft, Circle .I Devotion 885.40 feet pfOperty comer. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: w,rwpn c Ir. Nlniwvwe M. tSSY, SITE LEGEND: = eer.ee rw.wm w.r iuwmN -- Nom— ape w cunw »DK Pw a1Nz.p INLET PROTECTION DETAIL INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: C 1.0 SITE PIAN ' C2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C3.0 DEMOLITION PLAN C4.0 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C5.0 UTILITIES PUN CS,D STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C7.0 STANDARD DETAILS Q Taco Bell 3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE EDINA.MN 55155 <aS�RV Dry 111 d by: Border Foods 885 Decatur Avr NoM Golden Valley MN 55427 NewAAdraas as of ApdI 4.2014 _ 5425 e... Ave N. New Hope,MN 55428 CIVIL ENGIIVERRMO Se d DCSIGIJw �r.emM &1EP4NPE.gxW Wil, New BWMine N628, 28 Saab:1,847 SF STORM WATER AND EROSION CONTROLPLAN Neon mon C6.0 �wM.wln TACO BELL EDINA, MN U s�ia pyp 0� Y2b�°fid cu it d i0 I odi qqq 2sg8� gal $ m of K N i 9 § s QR a n.s 3 66!© 9 Ams a s e 0 I WHO s qqq 2sg8� gal $ m of K N i 9 § s ~- ~ ���� _—. . TA00 BELL EDINA. MN~ ^~~~ ^~~~~~^~~~~~^ ~``~ ``^`~ ~~^^^ ^~~^~ ......... ..... ^�^^^^. ^`^~^~ ^~~~~~ ~~^^~ ~~~^^ ^~^^~ ~^~^~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ^^~~~~~~~ ^~~~ ~~~~~ ^^^~^ ~^^^^ ^^^~^ TB~~~^~ ^^~^^ ��� ...~..Ij ....~. \0-0 ...... ...... ~^~~~~ `~~`~^ ^^^~~ ~~^~~^ ..... ...... ^~^~~ ~~~~~^ ^^^^^IJ ^^~~~^ ~~~~~~ ^^~~^~~~~^ ~~~~^~~^~^ .�............^�,,��....."���=�,`,��.............~ TACO BEU 4801m50TH ST. EDM, W � PREPARED BY: JUN °=x= 8 877-707-7378 � 502-961-0357 FAX x ibujakew=-s�. HU�M 4, 2014 ~- ~ ���� _—. . TA00 BELL EDINA. MN~ J NIST N �oyy • p _ ��� ay 6 _ e tm m ocu ° AIR g�§gFY�a€o� 3 #�`=v°a $E ugh:_ -$1 §: �9• •aE =ga y igE' Y g6 CE gg 3 m �s• s s• ��s`Y� flf"! $ �§ =y=� a° -E �i y ¢y ¢3 ppppS _rte a ,q p EVE E$�Qm• •��5' S�Y3� 7p�t YEn t,B= �� L• $mm�4ii $� s aY_ 8 Yu�Y •�' 8�"��3 p�p`pYp yya $sas� ff Sr r s� ��$�EE •s•g� fr�Rg 6 a46�aEaE�us e s �m fi'HiN id �� oma R sATHLVnxpaNANDODORFPu2F5 Ri HFAOAW lwRDONoiSEIa SaL® 0 OmExEGUREf Sart)SEIWEEx BURmlmaruaWPnELu9. TIF ® A ls.A�s ,SUPPLY aHDIIBTAuamloFAww�m, e. DExpitx rnecx DEfa. Di aunoxosgH.MmEasmaaaiEP2alart. zQ mwEiHRxvdegnv.9EE9HEEiavaumat.,. Q RmiMA O 9i npxrwwowaYerma.ttPrx QS �IXkR Q. a © 9Wa<•.aoaLnrOREPaNrENroN.ir;Hq,lalq. Q Aaaar2DlYaAI Q C—Em-3.71HRo EE'9s DffmuES NouxnxDRwg9rrwYH CumPYWRHrLMxELCI¢19.SEEECE0f EK �Lsa6fm.� C � nPFNfME WNMFWCP.WfM O DT.fs.mq. --- APePET -IIF,— -.ED. USET..— Sa Q Coi faLEPVKVEE awm. sEEOEINLLMYYN. Q O.EFAREVEALAIM. ' tQ sEawrtnwr,sET fuuaagxawrs. Q G.t49EPvgE ELEVATION WCL Aef oclelea. Inc. a Laa:O Taco Bell 3210 SouNtlale Chle MINA, MN 55435 GOA p aes ,HgNgss-,•rwalD.Efs. pe auEilaawEs9.rr,xxn.Efs. © ea9EmawEas.t aaf.s. D.E.P.S. THICKNESS xva D Developed 6y. OTY ITEM OEft—roN ELEC Border Foods OSS OecaNOrN 9Eu6ELL•sgxe�MV •e IN'H� Goltlen Vb MNa4ay MN 55,127 New MdI*ss as o/Apa1 4, 2014 SIGN SCHEDULE C 5425 Boone Ave N. New HOp0.MN5542R asssss.� WALLSH4LBE FP49iEDPgORTD aSiAWTgNOFSWROGFAR, iw .wti eaax w,.µey'wemei.., 0 SML4alE0MaSO1SfI4FiE2R a.vum n.aa.♦ Q roai u NDOaOR. HFenn. Q RNBEYam.PNMNI.uTgI aUA➢emWALL ® SWNOgGgPANtiOIUTCNwaIL • AL 2 iwAuarrFwaa mPAxYErumvmwmwoDosnm9roYaTcrsroRENrolrt. 9EEaaawna., 201 Y0.Ef.9. i0YATpITOPOFWIWpY,EGHI. PP(MpE t•O.Ei.SPWVETUT FOWf. _ Q Pa0W0EagepPNlEWBIAIERRAtiCLgtPX4fsf1 EIt1CLLgINO NPRE9 D _ �fOa FXImgRLLlwWgiE�sINYqEANOSIAinALLLEO.IggiNDIXaY. c POsarELOGTgrs wmOlwxan®of �— a>HPUEvaIx DMhISamH NMAIfpNttrgEP.v6fALLER sE.lALLPExEIMIgHSWFAP¢aigxf. NewE. W1Ig NI -28, 28 Seab; 1.e47 $F FKYEgIOq 6EVVpTOHB Me 1 a A4.0 TACO BELL EDINA MN ad{ � §| < / % ! J|� % rEti | ) i § |!\ /9 . rEti | ) i § MEMO ` Engineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371 �41NA, Fax 952-826-0392 • www.Cityofrdina.com �•—� Date: April 2, 2014 v ,b0 ' � l ��rtron, �r�• xeun To: Cary Teague — Community Development Director From: Chad Millner — Director of Engineering Re: 3210 Southdale Circle — Taco Bell Re -Development Plans Dated March 7, 2014 Engineering has reviewed the above stated proposed plan and offer the following comments: • A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit will be required; along with potential other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA, and MCES. • The City will consider the water and sanitary sewer pipes private utilities and the responsibility of the property owner for future maintenance and repair. The private water service begins at the gate value and the private sanitary sewer service begins at the sanitary sewer trunk pipe, both located in Southdale Circle. • A set of as -built plans will be required with the final C.O. • Details are needed on the infiltration system such as expected infiltration rates. This would be part of the watershed permitting process. • Indicate on plans what utilities are private versus public by noting that on the pipes. • Construct utilities per City of Edina Standard Details. • Watertight sanitary sewer castings are required on all sanitary sewer manholes / cleanouts. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. 4,17 G:\PW\ADMIN\COMM\EXTERNAL\GENERAL CORR BY STREETS\S Streets\3210 Southdale Circle - Taco Bell\201403xx CM -Edina Review 3210 Southdale Cir.doc Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 Date: March 27, 2014 To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director cc:. Tom Schmitz, Fire Chief From: David Fisher — Chief Building Official Re: 3210 Southdale Circle — Taco Bell — Demo & rebuild Draft Plans Dated March 7, 2014 The Building Department has reviewed the above proposed project with following comments: - Provide a complete building code analysis when the construction plans are submitted to the city for building permits. - Verify the number of occupants is less than 49 or the State Building Code requires the building to have a NFPA 13 fire sprinkler system. - Provide adequate fire dep!rtment access to the buildings. - Verify there is a grease trap that meets the MN State Plumbing. Code. - Retaining walls over 4 feel require engineering and a building permit. - Recommend this projectl has a pre -construction meeting with the design processionals, contractor, the project manager and the city building and fire department staff. M71 City of Edina a 4801 W. 50th St..- Edina, MN 55424 A. Sketch Plan —Taco Bell 3210 Southdale Circle Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission they are being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to tear down the existing Taco Bell building and rebuild a new slightly smaller building at 3210 Southdale Circle. Teague reported that the applicant would proceed with to redevelop the site. Appearing for the Applicant Barbara Schneider, for Border Foods Com Comments/Questions Commissioner Grabiel asked if the`house:„directly to 5:•: Edina, Planner Teague responded in tl,e';'affirtnative. Commissioner Forrest noted.,.a discrepanc�+in parluig plans and asked the applcanttobe clear on;that figur forward. Forrest ask' '.where 9&back is esi"61'siied ` from the property lints; review and variance approval of the subject property are in spaces refdreced and depicted on the wf%n:they`Ring their application Teagii`e:responded setback is established z :::. Comm issioner:`Seier..er com"merited that siie:.wondered if the audio box/menu board could be located;.on rl 'e new<bVilding in` a lo4cation &iii.lir':to McDonald's audio box/menu board south side. Plaf ner Teague responded` h 't:,.it appears -'W& proposed plans depict a five vehicle stacking queue, addirng.the applicant, Id neecl;:,to answer that question. Ms. Schneider addressed theCo%tnission and explained Border Foods is proposing to tear down and rebuild the ekist ng;_1aco Bell restaurant. Taco Bell has been operating at the Edina location since 1986, adding tide'proposed rebuilt is 27 GSF smaller than the existing building; however, it is 23'5" longer. Schneider explained the circulation on the site in one way and the same is proposed with the new structure. Schneider acknowledged that the request requires variance; however, she believes the increase in landscaping and turning radius in the one-way circulation pattern provides a better more efficient and safe site. Schneider also noted this layout allows for better placement of the audio box/menu board. 4% Comments/Questions Chair Staunton asked Ms. Schneider if Border is concerned about their long range plans. Staunton pointed out the property adjacent to the north is available and wondered if any interest was given to speak with those property owners. Ms. Schneider responded they )approached the property owners to the north (best Buy) and inquired if they had any desire o purchase the Taco Bell site and incorporate it into their site; however, to date there has be'en no movement from the owners of the Best Buy site one way or another Commissioner Grabiel asked if building design was contr..djJeel`by the corporate office. .5.,� •� 4 ,.•• Schneider responded in the affirmative. She said Taco ¢:el sifes;are managed very carefully Continuing, Grabiel said he finds the Southdale Circle`Properties;to be a bit unusual, noting it's unusual in Edina to have R- I residential properties ;abutting coma ereial. Planner Teague agreed, adding he would do some research o.:": el `.:• Commissioner Schroeder corn ented that he untie stands QO ,' ,inance stack ng, requirements; however, wonders if it would be a good idea to allo•'wi;som'e,.<..leiiiency when a p'K,,%,ect is redeveloped that opens up tote stf eet:providing a more::pedestrian feel and creating a better 4•:; '. r pedestrian experience, Planners Teague?��sRbtnd d that col )d.,be looked into pointing out the ' S• •;', Commission continual) discuss s the Or inanee: .I")s. Schne�dEr interjected that Taco Bell has r.•:,: a stacking formula of 5 vehicles rom the':audio box/M-6- pu boa r'cl °::Schroeder noted if the building is allowed to b- `:p'' °`; ''' e; ullecl loser to the'street::i;:ma}�<:provide tkie right number of stacking spaces to relocate tU:.audio bo ' menu board;:11>IsSchneider responded that they will look into that suggestion; howe 6h.. one ii em they needI'o,Meep in mind' is the location of the transformer. Chair St�uno't`'aslied`ifahe site::isbufferetl-ot'.`the easf. Ms. Schneider responded that presently there '►:s a;fence to the'"ea's .:, Sc neider said wi€l h*b buildings rearrangement they hope to be able to add?Spruce trees; `vihichis f er opinion would provide better screening for the residential`properties. Schneider also 'added that deciduous trees are planted on the neighbors' side of Commissioner ForreMsaid sh pickup, adding she wants; eyed; for the residential grope" Commissioner Platteter questio aren't any), pointing out there is occurs on both the Best Buy ani planned. Ms. Schneider responc anticipated. is a concern with the potential for cars idling as they wait for ng done to minimize wait time creating a better environment rs to the east. )ed if this would be a good area to construct sidewalks (if there a big push for sidewalks. in the area especially if redevelopment Wickes site. Continuing, Platteter asked if any patio seating is �d that the site is very tight and no outdoor seating is ha11 Commissioner Halva questioned if there could be two boards one on the north and one on the south. Ms. Schneider responded the south location could be difficult because a certain radius needs to be provided so the building isn't hit by vehicles. Chair Staunton said anything that can be done to minimize impact from the audio box/menu board would be appreciated. The discussion ensued on the following points; possible tweaking of the audio board/menu board and parking. It was again noted the discrepancy in parking stalls; however, the Commission acknowledged if doable they would rather see landscaping and screening instead of concrete. Continuing, the Commission stressed the importarieef`of "being a good neighbor" and reiterated the importance of doing everything possible t&,:reduce the impact of this establishment from the residential properties to the It was further discussed and acknowledged that,ih 'm:iny instancesItl`e;.Ordinance tends to over park sites; however, in this instance they wantassiii-ances parking wou:la( be adequate. Commissioners questioned if the majority of'the traffic at this Iocation'R-'d :ive-through traffic. Ms. Schneider responded in the affirmative. They ommissio.0 asked Ms. 56h-ider when formal S> .. application is submitted to prove that,,parking will Planner Teague reported that he in ti the east side of York Avenue and the Avenue. Commissioner Fischer'4sked outof,curiosityy of this nature. Ms. Scf'i;eider responded that 90 -days barring unforesiftpstaeles Chair Sta[dJ tof �`tl anked,Ms. Scl � ejder for import!'. of providing�sS:R, ning for the B. Tre`e'.Qrdinance � 3b found there are sidewalks along ,Richfield side of Xerxes "dov✓pfine" is on a tear down/rebuild n and rebuild can be accomplished within the sketch plan, reiterating the properties to the east. made a motion, conded by Member Sprague ccepting the Edina Rotary Foundation donation of an heirloo clock for Centennial L es Park. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Spra e, (Swenson, Hovl Motion carried. VIII.C. RESOLUTION NO. 201 � A PTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that i rder to c ply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and pr ved by four orable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson in oduce� and moved a tion of Resolution No. 2014-11 accepting various donations. ember Be nett seconded the mo ' n. Rollcal" Ayes: Benne , Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion ried. VIII.D. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED -3210 SOUTHDALE CIRCLE (TACO BELL) Community Development Director Teague presented the sketch plan for a new Taco Bell at 3210 Southdale Circle that would require several variances including a four -foot parking variance. He described proposed and requested setbacks, I building elements, and exterior materials. Mr. Teague advised that the size of the restaurant had been (reduced so the parking stall requirement would be met. He then presented comments of the Planning Commission, noting the menu board would be reoriented to lessen impact to the residential area. Proponent Presentation Barbara Schneider, Border Foods, X965 Decatur Avenue N., Golden Valley, described the site plan changes made in response to concerns ex ressed by the Planning Commission. She answered questions raised by the Council and agreed this site vas not ideal as it was somewhat undersized when compared to newer sites. Ms. Schneider reviewed the variances that would be requested for building setback, parking lot drive aisles, and menu board location. Following review and discussion of the Taco Bell sketch plan, the Council offered the following direction: inclusion of a bicycle rack and outdoor seating (if feasible); additional vegetation within green spaces (comparable to Centennial Lakes I Starbucks); permeable surfaces to accommodate stormwater, menu board orientation toward Southdale Circle; incorporation of design relief; and, review of parking counts to determine whether it would be an option to provide proof -of -parking to allow space for enhanced landscaping. VIII.E. SOUTHDALE MEDICAL ILDING, 6525 FRANCE AVENU — AMEND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO BUILD T PROOF -OF -PARKING P N — REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA This item was removed from the agenda at t request of the pr onent. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIO IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt various correspondence. IX. B. MINUTES: I. ENERGY & ENVII 2. HERITAGE PRESi 3. PARK BOARD, Ni 4. PLANNING COM S. ARTS & CULTUR 6. HUMAN RIGHTS Informational; no action required/ NME COMMISStRN, DECEMBER 12, 2013 PATI N BOARD, DECBER 9, 2013 E ER 12, 2013 ION, DECEMBER 11, 2 LATIONS COMMISSION, OCTOBER 22, 2013 Page 4 3�