Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-01-28 Planning Commission Meeting PacketsAGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS January 28, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Planning Commission January 14, 2014 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During 'Community Comment," the Planning Commission will Invite residents to share new Issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the some Issue In the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, Items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Variance. Bryan and Anita Erickson. 6617 Brittany Road, Edina, MN B. Lot Division and Variance. Donnay Homes. 3621 & 3625 54th St West, Edina, MN VII. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Update VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Council Update and Attendance IX. CHAIR AND COMMISSION COMMENTS X. STAFF COMMENT XI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process, if you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliflcatian, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 9S2-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Next Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission February 11, 2015 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # E-A. Breanne Rothstein January 28, 2015 B-15-03 l� Consultant Planner Recommended Action: Approve the requested variance to allow the construction of a second story addition on an existing, legal, non -conforming home. Project Description Bryan and Anita Erickson (applicants) are requesting a variance to complete an addition to their existing split level home located at 6617 Brittney Road. (See location on pages Al - A3.) The requested variance is a 4.11 foot deviation from the required 13.5 foot required side yard setback (as calculated as 10 feet plus .5 foot increase for every 1 foot over 15 feet in height, or 3.5 feet additional). The variance is necessary to build within the existing footprint because much of the existing home is nonconforming regarding side yard setback. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND The subject property is located in a neighborhood with single -level and split level homes. The homeowners are proposing to add a second story addition to their split level, increasing the footprint (in a conforming location) and are also propsing to add a patio in the front yard and a patio and deck in the rear yard of their property. A future detached shed is also indicated, although a separate permit and lot coverage calculation would be needed upon building permit to verify the zoning on that improvement. The zoning ordinance requires a minimum 13.5 -foot setback from the southern property line for this addition. The existing home is nonconforming, as it would require a 10 -foot setback and it is currently 9.39 feet from the property line. The front yard setback required is the average front yard setback of the homes on either side and this property meets that requirement. The front patio/porch is proposed to be located no more than 80 square feet into the required front yard setback, also meeting city code. The height would not exceed 30 feet overall. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single -dwelling homes. Easterly: Single -dwelling homes. Southerly: Single -dwelling homes Westerly: Single -dwelling homes Existing Site Features The subject property is 12,845 square feet. Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Engineering Review Single-family detached R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District An Engineering report is attached. There are no concerns indicated on the attached memo. (See page A13.) Building Design The proposal is to construct a two story home on the basic footprint and above the existing 1St floor of the split level home. Compliance Table * Variance Required 2 City Standard Proposed Front — Avg. of adjacent- 33.7 feet 36.1 feet Max porch in front yard 80 s.f. 80 s.f. Side- 13.5 feet *9.39 feet Building Height 2'/ stories 2 stories, 30 feet to ride 30 feet to ridge Lot coverage 25% 23.8% w/o shed * Variance Required 2 Primary Issues Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning District. The intent is to utilize the existing structure in its entirety, since footprint expansion is not possible without additional variances to reduce setbacks, causing a greater nonconformity. 2. The additions are appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements would enhance the property and not detract from neighborhood. The basic footprint of the home with the exception of the conforming garage expansion and the addition of a porch will not significantly increase. 3. The improvements would provide a reasonable use of the site and improve on the existing conditions. Spacing between the proponent's and the neighboring structure to the west would remain the same. 4. The variance would be for a small triangular "point intrusion" into the required setback. (See page A6.) This home and the home to the south were built at an angle to the side lot line. 5. The adjacent most impacted home to the south has the garage located adjacent to the requested variance area. (See page Al 1 .) There is a 20 - foot, 8 inch separation between the adjacent home. 6. The home improvements and height increase would provide enough space to accomplish a 2nd floor without having to completely reconfigure the property, (not a tear-down/re-build). • Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The practical difficulty is the original placement of the home located in a non -conforming location. Additionally, the variance would be for a small triangular "point intrusion" into the required setback. This home and the home to the south were built at an angle to the side lot line. (See page A6.) There is a 20 -foot, 8 inch separation between the adjacent home. The adjacent most impacted home to the south has the garage located adjacent to the requested variance area. (See page All) 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the inability to increase the roof height to provide adequate living space above the home at existing nonconforming setbacks without the benefit of a variance. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The basic footprint of the home will remain relatively the same and spacing between structures will remain the same. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it slightly alters existing setback conditions without reducing setbacks further or impacting the surrounding neighbors. b. The practical difficulty is the location of the existing home, which does not meet the required side yard setback. The imposed setback and 4 existing house location do not provide opportunity for a second floor without a variance. c. The variance would be for a small triangular "point intrusion" into the required setback. This home and the home to the south were built at an angle to the side lot line. d. The adjacent most impacted home to the south has the garage located adjacent to the requested variance area. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: ➢ Architectural plans date stamped November 4, 2014 ➢ Grading drainge and erosion control plan date stamped January 8, 2015 ➢ Building plans/ elevations date stamped November 4, 2014 ➢ Engineering memo dated January 22, 2015. Deadline for a city decision: February 13, 2015. 16501 6500, a u ��, 65056504 65f10 .6501i i X6501 500 5015500 P500 �- K :m,��__I 6508 6508 508 x i P✓ 5096508 _ _ X651 .__ 65096508 � 503 508, , 651316512 tl ._ 6512 - , ; 517 X6516 �. 6517 6516 6521 516 517 512" 8517 516r� fi65256524 \3\� 6521 .640 " i 6516' �� �a� e� ��r 652 4 645 524 525 l X6532 \\ _, _ �, ��a�A 4812 4734 j652916528 6529 1 65286533 6533 11416600 6601 6600 6600 6601 ? 4809 _ 6605 6E08 6602 6605 6604 9012 6610 i 6612 � %609166041 - w`617 24" 6616 8 .`o ��oeuoaeoe"cep �� 5010 6G20 14a r '` 6620 ',6613 6EA8 ;A 6613 6617 66176629 5008 >30„ 6641 6624 E+621 - 6621 - x 6629 r 1,`= 500416634,i i 6705 6628 i 6625 _. r - _... - 6629 '�w a; 4524 00f,6709 6632 6629 .1 r � I __ � t�6633 6713 6636 6636_' 5005 65640 �a, 6637 6700 #� ii i g j MIT.. 6700 ROYCAk ROAD t l ". 6641 6704 t I PAY COL i 1 909}905` 6704 r� 6701 - �: i j t 6708 , .k. 167001 ` - ._.�. 67 9 `. (►e 6801 i 6800 qi a tis 6705 _ 6712 0 i r j z ..,� � 5116 ,ted ' 5112 6805 6804 a r .. , 6 _�� 6709 ...�_.�24, z' A .v - e6716t '" 15108 A` z 6809 68082 4704 ,4712`4708' X5105 `5104 6813 6812, a ,._. 2l Parcel 30-028-24-32-0091 Map Scale: V tt 400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 1/23/2015 Owner B Erickson & A M Erickson Parcel 6617 Brittany Rd Address: Edina, MN 55435 I Property Residential This ma is a compilation of data from various Type: sources and is fumished "AS IS" with no Home- representation or warranty expressed or Homestead Implied, Including fitness of any particular stead: ' purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.29 acres COPYRIGHT ® HENNEPIN COUNTY 2015 Area: 12,845 sq ft A Ttetnk'Greeftt At Aa A3 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties In complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable This variance will not allow for infringement on space between homes but only relieve difficulties in adding a second floor partially due to an existing non -conforming setback. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district a ❑ Yes this variance is only applicable to correct and relieve the circumstances of the property in question and will not pertain to any other property or zoning district in the vicinity. Be In harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance The intent and purpose of this variance is comp ly in line with the zoning ordinance; that is to maintain current setbacks while i g the appearance of the existing structure and the neighborhood. .� Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood The essential character of the neighborhood will not be altered but rather improved by the proposed variance. Currently the property in question is somewhat out of character for it is probably the least esthetically appealing and has the shallowest roof pitch of any of the surrounding houses. Also this home as been neglected for an extended period of time causing some aspects of blight to the existing character of the neighborhood which is generally new, maintained or newly remodeled, or well condition. SITE ADDRESS: 6617 BRITTANY RD. EDINA MN 55455 r EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR: BJORN & ANITA ERICKSON Legend 0 O Nrsaal :---:-•— w.t.wue aw .Pa1p 6xtwy Cwwtlen -------IA n l r A n n T I !l n l .IW.arc rap el cue EI.wl6n ( Top .r wd el.+otwn 1 I I♦ t V r� V W v v •—epP—' E.I.Wa C.nteur / I I I u sn� vlm k C® N.cr RLLL��L f5210.P. ee I �' SCALE: 1 INCH ID FEET I � t �.• .y. ,I N89'36'45'E ,I __-144.85 MEAS."' *+ �" '""'�-"-- a• o x--149.88 MEAS.r-- I 'a ,� •_" D � .ru IupFAvwls aptFFnrf q�'.r�, � Imop[wry otscawnw: ul I� w�.ir: MxnmNnL roNa. ulnNEsorp, -?I � m Cj r .:e .. nen wn:, ...e• .wa ! � ar N P mor`sni NN wnwc ^a0M1' L 0 -J t` \ w• �•1e ` ` ` ,. �re. rea .e nam �e;, �,gy.' y3�: 5.3 \- •� w _ .e.. �' � , � t� w.r o w.� I � ..rtw�, e,:...,.,, pxa;,d•��., .a, pr.pa,.e pT� C"" ..wa„/ �Ah � N89SS6'15`E ,y r,� �. e�w amen m. a'.i tm• stet<et �.mtiy •°'wl.,.a — \ , 1W U!N SIIRn£YIM4 tl14r` < \ \ m r` J T I..e..w k 6— 013. MN REG 15L t pale: GG-is-]ptA <.J�y GENERAL NOTES r�aairormi. ro'eroewt r.a.w.ro ...nrgw� eerow .oe..ee r. a.sw.. e. Mwcantwwmr..roxMr a.rraw.nwo.awao...rtwwc rt..orme uwwo r qt roaw.. Y W L Halle. MM M MrlroeR � rYRIN. MITI HC.O W. ro ee.u�a1 IRM TgY�NO OM M Mt.aa01M.% MLrorD.la ap01O ro IW q.0.'IC411p11101Y 0..1.0laYlLLtIOMMC}pl Rl. W1l111Ca!'a111..W iMYMM.1901mIrWik lq.'M••b.IMY nLL � M.IM..W IIOO.IO.IIHL..aagpYll! ..1.4� Y H�atoae..r..a..rmro..eror YO /LLallrot a.laMe.a.PI1W WIIMe1w1mNMMMw.rtawm...rw.e,r.waac t.wt�ema�ontwnu.maino.woo.r••wH•u•m.owca.ews.sn.w•.n�w�a ierac [L\'all HtYM �lp�L Ab aaOTp.•MMeI.•R..l.0Am 1•MOrtgN eRgG.RCf�a.aetlLN�.•R mlllaC®WaN•eI.0 L YLO.OAalroiroHCNa lfN.14L. r.ORAfM U4{i•. ga.rW6 MrtIMIY.ta.a.Ml.fgYt if'ItGNe G1wlW YI.IMf4161K.Mo 0RgJYW Mim CN HAI .iw Kt.WtYYLLM 1 .YL aex.wanax rnc.1.IL aeNawl m gL.tlRlelro. aeon l qt.eLAMNRW.tClwatlwYgoaeole9tlMlrbi♦Wlll.b a.1.IM.�LIla 4/1.Yaal.L e. ert M 1lAL1M MaMMC1e. MOAq[ MLroI a Mr f rote VY a..r e.0 lsrowlr aaaarr AD wusaxeaawwMM.w•.aelmra., wa.WrolM.I wlY.am Mraelaeara pq.Y.l.Te Ya.pro•oi.q.•T mM....a. M.OK..11LM a M allM.lro0. � q�wnwL�i.earro�aaroe ur�onaawnreLwearo�aaresneerwnaw.merarae C�eS EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR: .�.., BJORN & ANITA ERICKSON - - K A N E A D 0 1 T1 O N .. omm NNW i � I q IIO.YRA .tA L 0 T S I ro..�wA Wrrow nesw .o n.r..a.a•a m r e r� t111�aG r i n■uouo nrrrrrrrrr rranruuo ■rrrrrrrrr '� rrrrorru ■rrrrrrrrr ■rrrrrrrrr ■rrrrrrrrr ■r/rrrrrrr ■rrrrrrrrr !! a rorrrrru 3 ■rrrrrrrr■ rrrrrrrrrr � uouru■ ■rrrrrrrr■ �«�T aurora M • Fit ■ • ems-_' � 1 cAi ®noaQ raw . LOOR Wh% �tLmie rtaN • &ARAM Am Kffcwm t Eyms Ct�a ooR PUN • r>mrsoon LErEL �.N 0•w...nwrM....n..r.a.I.wW • tNrort qX.• _�- •1lwb�t X PD3 OE 1'W i :ajoos { ; a ]ta 9zt Naa szz 'ros &An— of Qs -pari Qgsv$ NV-lc� 9 L 101 mama vw ZIA uO-.t s AA 1. � fn emi���/��/Oi 1�1� • ni 0MEM—E B2ollljl t//1©©■■■■■/noon■// NOR 0 ] C541W WG1 DCGIIUV a LIVINU KUN'I aes my > M7 Tw> e.amer.rmvlSJl1 brg0 s.�+nEaknm. st1EEi' MDEX .auras r�crumrwiamacao� .�. eteKamnea .e a,a�aamva. PI'"Er TEAM _dp�411TECT aMMotdT OOpN NiD GOivah. LLG ewm awa.T-ew.lr.er BTRJCNRAL ENG—R oENERAL CONTRACTOR Deep[o. er PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN • BEDROOM LEVELv m o� �A3 Dlm'OPa �1101FMM tAWtlaxTl A6M OLIN OQl1I. PROJECT TEAM 6RLWITELT lTFaICTlRN. EK^.PlEER F ®DOapGD. eY Cu.Cv. j GbJBRdJ_ CGNIRfuCYpR 1 To D6 DDCp6D, OY OD¢rt QEMERIOR ELEVATION - WEST1-1L-' Cc3adene wOAarA� Ilf.. M• M fl N MDrzICY..M1 1-11-4 ©Wom1•ommo1 MUCH: MUCH: Mmilli� i des 4 TrI- �w sew ADO ee.m nvmrno a,n.nr xsmwr � _ p Y+wM1W.Mt1W� bbBp�vntl wlp.em Ta1O� SWEET Ma)( J, \ "�ODr.'� %Il'[DNC6 ibMorOo� ,wYvamRMre1M.¢TOI u 11.1nm6lN m gOR.Cmpdv.. PROJECT TEAM 6RLWITELT lTFaICTlRN. EK^.PlEER F ®DOapGD. eY Cu.Cv. j GbJBRdJ_ CGNIRfuCYpR 1 To D6 DDCp6D, OY OD¢rt QEMERIOR ELEVATION - WEST1-1L-' Cc3adene wOAarA� Ilf.. M• M fl N MDrzICY..M1 1-11-4 ©Wom1•ommo1 MUCH: MUCH: Mmilli� i EWOR ELEVATION - 5011T14 A5 Wri des v > �u so.e u..n n.n saxemsm. s.la.n �>® ssvuvss naw.crossnr mnvye.mpenm...a SHEET MDEX nvn mv�m.ae � u.wTa.a+iwrmmaziim u nevamnna PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT eaYv�n oe.+Yw fro adYesn. UG STpL^hIRAL E3JGaJEER 90 Ct DeCIOCD, mY a116R. ERiCKSON OME R,6.1 mi N'AeRl Nm A TA R 0 \O A5 6613 BRITTANY RD. - 6613 BRITTANY RD. 6UBJECT PROPERTY boil BRITTANY RD. 5EFORE IMPROVE" LENTS SCALE, V*.. 6621 BRITTANY RD. 661'1 BRITTANY RD. AFTER IMPROVEMENTS SCALE, 1AW • 1'-V WORN and ANITA ERICKSON DOME REMODEL DATE, 10-30-14 R , dbsTil rnmpany,� «a.mna sure.,.' SMSIDt Tw 9IIlA91,� saYt)YmmhEDi w.waenmmsuv t�AV•�Tt OoO,E�u i COM�ANLttC LOCATION, UPGRA01EtTT I DFSLT FENCE GRADING & ST®RMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN oC�C�dC DJCRN & ANITA ERICKS®N ��Dp RAM GARDEN NOTES: 1. ALLSUSMATERWLSBELDWTHESPECIFIEDRAMGARDENDO"IEI.EVATIOABSHALLBEUNLIISTURBED UNLESS OTHERWEE NOTED. 2. INSTALL A RAM GAROENFLANTING MEDIUM TO A DEPTH OF M INCHES P) WITH CLEAN SAID. 0.= 823,0 3. INSTAL SILT FENCE ANDKIR MULCH BERMS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE BASIN WRING CONSTRUCTION, _Tit! „J_ Il 3 1. ALLDOWM-GRADIENT PERIMETER S- IMENT Co— BAT'S MUSTBEIN PLACE BEFORE ANY LIP .—EENT LAND DIS .INGACTIV-BEGINS.7. 7. Ty II�L,��IWj��y�TI j Al 1 i3 . EL 6120 IIJ nn u yG S. CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDEN UPON STABILIZATION OFCONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. Il �T 6' OF LANDSCAPE ROCK DR PLANTINGS, TO BE E�ODSTING S. INTHEEVEMTHATSEDIMENTfS INTRODUCED SITOTHE RAIN GARDEN DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION. TIPS MATERIALSHALL SIRGRADE-MATERIAL ewe x acct BEREMOVEOFROMTHESASINPRWRTOCDNTINUINGCDNSTRUCTIGN. DETERNNEOBYOWNER T. GRAONG OF RAIN GARDEN SHALL BEAOCOMPLISHEDUSWGLOW-COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EOUPMENTTO PREVENTCOMPACTAON OF 3FT OF CLEAN SANG UNOERLYMG SOILS 3 Z?,,,cLE ,NSA RAIN GARDEN TYPICAL SECTION l/ INSTALL CATCH BASINMLETPROTECTION ATTMES.E.INTERSECRON OF BRTRANY RD. dWBBTH STS EE DETAILLCOet ANO NOTE 1BICfK12 L `'' T 1 WIMP STRAP — OIMPGIWIP 1' REBAR FDR SAC REMOVAL FROM MLET �. DUMP STRAPS,- 2 EACH SILTSACK Mi A EXPANSION - RESTRAINT [1M"NYLON ROPE, YPLATWASHERS7 IN LLLET PROTECTION e wpcuE PRE -ASSEMBLED SILTATION FENCE PLACED ON CONTOUR P BE S00'MAXIMUMLENGTH BE - TURN EN EBTURNEN IFLOWSDPE TO PREVENT FLOW BYPASS J MAXIMUM T 12' ON CENTE2 SPACING OF POSTS /--PRE-ASSEMBLED Nz I WX112W-WWDDO POSTS i MIN'.6' MUM iEMBEDMENT COMPACTED SUBGRAD MINMUMWBURY SNS' EARTH FILL OR e"HTMRONTAL MINIMUM PLOWED IN MINIMUM IN S' FABRIC SILT FENCE SI�LTAD ON FENCE am eovE Proposed Legend O_'. Anon •121S P,vpvvpd $pot 0- _._ :Z= PoaeJ Cenbur y1t Fa,Ke LOCATION, UPGRA01EtTT I DFSLT FENCE GRADING & ST®RMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN oC�C�dC DJCRN & ANITA ERICKS®N ��Dp RAM GARDEN NOTES: 1. ALLSUSMATERWLSBELDWTHESPECIFIEDRAMGARDENDO"IEI.EVATIOABSHALLBEUNLIISTURBED UNLESS OTHERWEE NOTED. 2. INSTALL A RAM GAROENFLANTING MEDIUM TO A DEPTH OF M INCHES P) WITH CLEAN SAID. 0.= 823,0 3. INSTAL SILT FENCE ANDKIR MULCH BERMS TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR ENTERING THE BASIN WRING CONSTRUCTION, _Tit! „J_ Il 3 1. ALLDOWM-GRADIENT PERIMETER S- IMENT Co— BAT'S MUSTBEIN PLACE BEFORE ANY LIP .—EENT LAND DIS .INGACTIV-BEGINS.7. 7. Ty II�L,��IWj��y�TI j Al 1 i3 . EL 6120 IIJ nn u yG S. CONSTRUCT RAIN GARDEN UPON STABILIZATION OFCONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. Il �T 6' OF LANDSCAPE ROCK DR PLANTINGS, TO BE E�ODSTING S. INTHEEVEMTHATSEDIMENTfS INTRODUCED SITOTHE RAIN GARDEN DURING OR IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION. TIPS MATERIALSHALL SIRGRADE-MATERIAL ewe x acct BEREMOVEOFROMTHESASINPRWRTOCDNTINUINGCDNSTRUCTIGN. DETERNNEOBYOWNER T. GRAONG OF RAIN GARDEN SHALL BEAOCOMPLISHEDUSWGLOW-COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EOUPMENTTO PREVENTCOMPACTAON OF 3FT OF CLEAN SANG UNOERLYMG SOILS 3 Z?,,,cLE ,NSA RAIN GARDEN TYPICAL SECTION l/ INSTALL CATCH BASINMLETPROTECTION ATTMES.E.INTERSECRON OF BRTRANY RD. dWBBTH STS EE DETAILLCOet ANO NOTE 1BICfK12 L `'' T 1 WIMP STRAP — OIMPGIWIP 1' REBAR FDR SAC REMOVAL FROM MLET �. DUMP STRAPS,- 2 EACH SILTSACK Mi A EXPANSION - RESTRAINT [1M"NYLON ROPE, YPLATWASHERS7 IN LLLET PROTECTION e wpcuE PRE -ASSEMBLED SILTATION FENCE PLACED ON CONTOUR P BE S00'MAXIMUMLENGTH BE - TURN EN EBTURNEN IFLOWSDPE TO PREVENT FLOW BYPASS J MAXIMUM T 12' ON CENTE2 SPACING OF POSTS /--PRE-ASSEMBLED Nz I WX112W-WWDDO POSTS i MIN'.6' MUM iEMBEDMENT COMPACTED SUBGRAD MINMUMWBURY SNS' EARTH FILL OR e"HTMRONTAL MINIMUM PLOWED IN MINIMUM IN S' FABRIC SILT FENCE SI�LTAD ON FENCE am eovE DATE: January 22, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer FROM: Charles Gerk EIT — Engineering Technician RE: 6617 Brittany Road - Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Summary of Review Engineering has no concerns with the plans as submitted. The proposed plan appears to be for multiple additions, a proposed garage and some landscaping / patio work to an existing single family home. The proposed storm water management plan directs any additional run-off created to a rain garden designed by a licensed engineer. If driveway is to be replaced, applicant will need to apply for a curb cut permit Grading and Drainage The proposed storm water management plan directs any additional run-off created in the rear yard to a rain garden designed by a licensed engineer. The purpose of the rain garden is to collect, store and infiltrate any additional run-off created from the proposed plans. The rain garden is adequately sized and will prevent additional run-off to neighboring private properties. Erosion and Sediment Control No concerns Street and Curb Cut If driveway Is to be replaced, applicant will need to apply for a curb cut permit Water and Sanitary Utilities No concerns ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwYAinaMN.gov.952-826-0371. Fax 952-826-0392 A i3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague January 28, 2015 VI.B. Director of Planning INFORMATION & BACKGROUND Project Description Donnay Homes are proposing to tear down the existing double dwelling unit at 3621 and 3625 54t" Street West, and build a new one. (See property location on pages Al—A3.) To accommodate the request, the following is requested: 1. A two -foot side street setback variance from 20 feet to 18 feet, so the garage adjacent to Drew Avenue has its opening facing Drew, rather than 54th Street; 2. A lot area variance from 15,000 square feet to 10,748 square feet and lot width variance from 90 to 80 feet to built the new structure. The lot size and width are existing conditions, but would still require a variance; and 3. A lot division to create a party -wall division of the new structure. The new structure would be built with a fire rated wall separating the two units. This would provide protection for each unit, should there be a fire on the other side. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 Al2.) Within this area there are a mixture of duplexes and single-family homes, zoned both R-1, Single -Family Residential and R-2, Double -Dwelling Unit. (See pages A2 A3.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: City of Minneapolis; single-family homes. South: Single-family dwellings; zoned and guided for single-family homes. East: Double -dwellings; zoned and guided for double -dwellings. West: Single-family dwellings; zoned and guided for single-family homes. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a duplex. (See page A2-A2c.) Planning Guide Plan designation Zoning: Variance — Lot Area and Width Low-density attached residential R-2, Double -dwelling unit residential Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 9) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. The lot size and width are existing conditions. To deny this variance would deny the property owner reasonable use of the property, which is a lot that allows a double -dwelling unit. The practical difficulty is the existing size of the property, which does not meet the minimum lot size requirement of 15,000 square feet or width of 90 feet. The City has routinely granted variances for existing lot size and width variances for building new double dwellings. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R-2 zoning district, but it is unique. 2 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The use of the site would not change; therefore, the character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of the lot area variance. The height of the new structure would be four (4) feet shorter than what would be allowed on this site. Variance — Side Street Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance, variances should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. The lot size and narrow width of the lot are the practical difficulties that limit the size of the building pad for a double dwelling unit. The applicant could relocate the garage opening for the garage to 54th Street, and all required setbacks would be met. However, in doing so, there would be more building articulation along the side wall, as each side of the home facing the street would appear to be a single family home. (See page A9.) This would be more consistent with the neighborhood given the single family homes that exist across the street from each garage door opening. (See pages A2, A3, and A10.) There is a 12 inch Maple that would be removed as a result of the garage opening toward Drew Avenue. (See page A6.) The applicant believes that the architecture of the home is a better trade off than saving the tree, and having a larger blank side wall. The applicant has indicated a willingness to plant an additional 4 inch Maple tree on each new lot to replace the 12 - inch Maple; and will be saving the 22 -inch Locust to the south, and the 24- 3 inch Locust just south of the 3625 side of the building. (See landscape plan page Al Ob.) 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The small size and narrow width of the existing property is not uncommon in the R-2 zoning district, but it is unique. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The use of the site would not change; therefore, the character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of the lot area variance. The height of the new structure would be four (4) feet shorter than what would be allowed on this site. Compliance Table * Variance Required Primary Issue Are the proposed variances and lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed variances for lot area and width are reasonable given that the existing lot is substandard at 10,748 square feet in size and 80 feet in width. There is no change in use of the property. 2. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R-2 zoning district. 4 City Standard Proposed Front (54) 36.08 feet 36.90 feet Side Street (Drew) 20 feet garage facing street *18 feet 15 feet with side facing street NA Side 10 feet 11.3 feet Rear- 35 feet 46 feet Building Height 2 1/2 stories, 35 feet 2 stories, 31 feet Lot Area 15,000 s.f. *10,748 s. f. Lot Width 90 feet *80 feet Lot coverage 25% 24.5% * Variance Required Primary Issue Are the proposed variances and lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed variances for lot area and width are reasonable given that the existing lot is substandard at 10,748 square feet in size and 80 feet in width. There is no change in use of the property. 2. The small size of the existing property is not uncommon in the R-2 zoning district. 4 3. The character of the neighborhood would not be altered. The site contains a double dwelling, and would contain a new double dwelling upon approval of both variances. 4. The practical difficulties that limit development of the property are the narrow lot width and substandard lot size. 5. The drainage plan would direct run-off away from adjacent properties, which would be an improvement over existing conditions. (See the engineering department's review on page A13.) 6. The applicant could relocate the garage opening for the garage to 54th Street, and all required setbacks would be met. However, by having the garage face Drew, there would be more building articulation along that side wall, and each side of the home facing the street would appear to be a single family home. (See page A10.) These conditions would be more consistent with the neighborhood given the single family homes that exist across the street from each garage door opening. 7. The applicant has indicated a willingness to plant an additional 4 -inch Maple tree on each new lot to replace the 12 -inch Maple, and will be saving the 24 -inch Maple to the south, and the 24 -inch Locust just south of the 3625 side of the building. (See page A10b.) These two newly planted trees would not be required in the new tree ordinance that was just recommended by the Planning Commission, as it is located in the proposed driveway area. The existing shrubs along the east and north lot lines would remain, but be trimmed. 8. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council approve the variances and lot division as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. The new double dwelling shall be built per the submitted plans date stamped December 24, 2014, and January 9, 2015. 2. The 24 -inch Locust and 22 -inch Locust on the site shall be maintained and protected during construction. 3. The applicant shall plant and additional 4 -inch Maple on each new lot to replace the 12 -inch Maple that is to be removed. 4. Each unit shall have separate utility hook-ups. 5. The units will be separated by a fire -wall; and be verified by the City's building official. Deadline for a city decision: February 24, 2015 2 t , rt t -- i�.�- 1 521-71 11zi 5225 ; 'z Jj 5224 _ _. ^ . yet 5241 i 245249' y —z. - W JE 5301 ' 5304 5345 5310 ; 5310 { , 5309 i ! ! 5317 5321 5325 5330 5329 --.3 I 15333 5354 i 5337 5353 - 5357 5352 - 5353 _ =_ 247 5400 5441 i i 5401 i 5401 �_ '• i �5 544 5402 ° ;5443' 5412 - - - ` Q41324' 421 5409 5404` 5405 3225, f`� - 5_410 5406 Co =_ _ 416 X5417 e _ 5471 . FULLR STREET _ ._ _ 5420 5425 428 429111 5432 (sem; 5437 436 E i 9 , . 17 t 5444 t l - — -- 1 - 5501 24 I'",z i t r 5441 5440 -- i 55TH Sf kET WEST ' _. ) 59DO i .5 1 59Q0 809 s � w... 24 i .... 1 nr P 3 5508 . iii .€ � 24 5504 5504 35055 4 551 1�5505517_� i 1 ' ,VI 5_5 8 D5155124245524a55215a5; r X68'66 63 24 55085 HSTRET WEST 0552! .? 70 A `°�;<:, (5521 I _ _ __._ 7� , i t .., 59 5512 t s 2 " � - 65 74 w r,. 62 " 57 5605 `' ���5524 Parcel 20-028-24-22-0028 A -T -B: Map Scale:1 400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 1/22/2015 Owner Paul J Donnay Three Uc Market Name: Total: Parcel 3621 54Th St W Tax Address: Edina, MN 55410 Total: Sale Property Residential -Two Unit Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is famished "AS IS" with no Home- representation or warranty expressed or Stead' Non -Homestead implied, including fitness of any particular purpose, merchantability, or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 0.25 acres Area: 10,698 sq ft COPYRIGHT�i HENNEPiN COUNTY 2015 ■ , Thhk,.Greenl k` w 7 t y },i x S I 5ng � r � � r Y x } 4 " c r` 4 v def J it 10 .. w , w � I 7 t y },i x S I 5ng 6 i}c x Y x } 4 N r` 4 v def J f r�4 4�. t 7 t 6 Y } 4 f r�4 4�. 7 t y ! f _ rytl + +� t� r tt t � ft� ZoN��tG w Legend yP ,rrrrsr■ ,rrrwrrr •+, �rrou■ •M/ .Ye , i e.. e. .t e, ChuMh y�q� MT Ptwom SChod P dit SdaW pwvftow 2Z 54TH & FRANCE DETAIL 9 �-1 If �' ■ ] ■ -- -; ..... ........ . FULLER ST 9 �-1 If �' ■ ] ■ 4P(64'It rtlIo iw(� 1. Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable - Lot is legal, non -conforming. The choice to 'split' the garage doors to the front and side of the building allows for a less 'Garage -focused' set of Elevations. Garage Setback to Drew Ave lot line is 18'8", which is a deviation of 1'4" from the required 20' and allows for a reasonable depth of Garage in this configuration. 2. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity orzoning district— the Zoning Code established the current minimum standards after this lot was created; lot is legal, non -conforming, but is smaller than current requirements. The deviation for the garage setback for 3621— W 50 Ave. still allows for off- street parking for this lot. 3. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance — Approval allows continued use of the legal non -conforming lot within the current Zoning. The deviation for the garage setback does not detract from the intent of providing for off-street parking. The recessing of the garage door area adds relief to the new building 4. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood — Approval continues the existing 'duplex' - style use, maintains the existing density, but allows for additional open and enclosed off-street parking for the residents. STING CONDITIONS A"UILT SUF PRONEOT 1& 15503.00 PREPARED FOR: DONNAY HOMES 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION (00@.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION —.-- INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE 891.09 - FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 892-87 - FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 891.0 DENOTES ASSUILT ELEVATION ADDRESk 5629 54TH ST %Esr MCHMAW-, INN NW QUADRANT OF 54TH ST WEST AND LANE AVENUE ELEV.-893.18 .fit—`► LOT AREA : 10,748 50. rr D IsnNG HOUSE ARM : t,518 5Q. rr PORCH AREA: G7 50, IT DOTING GARAGE AREA: 585 50. FT DZ11NG DMVFWAY ARIA : 550 50. rr SCALE : 1" - 2O' Legal Description LOTS 6 do 7, BL( IVANDAIE PARK. HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA INC. am eiV.i6 , M0.a0 4 I Ma.M Mast i IMsa ® MBs.+@ 54TH 5TIR.EET WEST j ieoss sass a f - I xM79 K M1.14 a" sues a" SOL" I case 71 0K= Tc ON rt Tc N8@ 56'21"E Tc nae O.O�O RLAT MEAS. i Ij M..I Be" MBD Be" 4 7 - $ f aMs LO a LOT a6Me% 1! Xm.Q of sea' a" WLA 8@.17 tans �V, I a$ 1 as, IXou+ s M.1 I REV18EO @9.2018: ADO EXWING 22•LOOUBTTREE ALONG VOW PROMERTYLVIL I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and de9aieed hereon. As prepared by me this 15TH cyWof Y, 201 T P ^.4 rr'us .Reg. Ho 1 6 RUSSELL P. DAMLO 15TM M1.18 EXISTING HOUSE �� IrALP 1 ST .07 M.07 15T RIG .@ 2 ON OHM tu tI � a MIA 0oo•'d' 13 W vi M T eMa $ MSA 4 M n g y" 19.56 IOAt so i mu M1.e M}' ... I 811 19.9-8 MI.! M/d M1.7>ar� mm 801.0 r l M0.@ Wa0 # GARAGE GARAGE l fI eao GARAGE 0 PROJW NO. 15503.00 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PREPARED FOR: SITE PIAN DONNAY HOMES 000.0 DENOTES D(ISTING ELEVATION (891.0) DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION —No-- INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE - FAD GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION is i -P) — TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION (SM") - BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION —(OW-01 - M NN ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION MMM.. - LOWEST POINT OF ENTRY REAR WINDOWS e9M:.e7 - ORIGINAL SSE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION AREAS LOT 1: ADDRESS 3621 54TH STREET WEST LOT AM: 5,742 50. FT "OUSE AM: 1.295 50. FT FORM AREA: G5 5Q. Fr DECK AREA: 120 5Q, FT (NA) FRONT SIDEWALK AREA; 46 50. FT (NA) DIJVEWAYARPA : 282 SQ. PT (NA) IMFERVIOU5 AREA.- 1.363 50. FT (23.7%) NOTE: PORCH ON LOT 1 HAS 44A SO. FT. ENCROACHMENT INTO SETBACK AREAS LOT 2: ADDRESS 3625 54TH STREET WEST IAT AREA : 5.006 50. PT HOUSE ALMA: 1.190 50. FT FORM AREA s 54 50. IT COVMW STOOP AREA : 30 50. PT DECK AREA : 120 50, Fr OW FRONT 51DI:WALK AREA : 44 50. FT M DRNEWAY AREA : 620 5Q, Frew IWTRVIOL15 AREA : 1,274 50. FT M5.4%) BENCHMARK: TNN MW QUADRANT OF SM ST WEST AND LAIR: AVENUE EM.-N&IB SCALE : I' - 20' Legal Desmoon: LOTS 1 * 2. BLOCK 1. DONNAY'S DREW ADOMON, i 54T"i57l A4 +�IBe ea ae,�a LSMu I 8" Tconrr saa • eM w N89'S8'21 "E- sus seas } �. MEA, ( °°os �. 1 MMseex ROM B / '�' Ix —i 0 ori: rrar■ r;s:� GARA(JE PicVIBEO OI-I&I& ADD EXWr*I6 22' LOCWTREB ALONG VVEST PROPERTY UJME. WMW 1244•14: ADD OSB. REV18E PORCH ON LOT 1, WiVIE WWMA A ARRA Cl/,OUtI1710148, REVISE PORCH DICROAtxH W NOTE, AND RMM LOT NMM�B. \ LOT 5 T V15TTNG I xI 1/71 HOL15E i lb— /Ldii;"2,��' `!o L6T > �� sear sea 80.00 PLAT ° BOAS MEAS. GARAGE S89'43`OM PicVIBEO OI-I&I& ADD EXWr*I6 22' LOCWTREB ALONG VVEST PROPERTY UJME. WMW 1244•14: ADD OSB. REV18E PORCH ON LOT 1, WiVIE WWMA A ARRA Cl/,OUtI1710148, REVISE PORCH DICROAtxH W NOTE, AND RMM LOT NMM�B. \ LOT 5 T V15TTNG I xI HOL15E > I U"WYwoart I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representotion of a treat as she" and //�dese ed here m As 1prepared by me this 12TH r "' E Minn. Reg. No. 19086 RUSSELL P. DAMLO PROJECT NO. 15503.00. PREPARED FOR:DONNAY HOMES 000.0 DENOTES EXSTING ELEVATION (891.0) DENTES PROPOSED ELEVATION r INDICATES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE (01.94) = FINISHED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 01•ffn - TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION = BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION ( = MAIN ENTRY FLOOR ELEVATION (MOO) = LOWEST POINT OF ENTRY REAR WINDOWS 592.57 e. ORIGINAL HOUSE FlRST FLOOR ELEVATION AREAS LOT 1: ADDRESS 3621 54TH STREET WEST LAT AREA : 5,742 5Q, PT HOUSE ARFA : 1,295 50. PT PORCH AREA : 68 S0. FT DECK AREA:: 120 50. PT(NA) FRONT 51DEWALK AREA 46 5Q. PT (NA) DRIVEWAY ARPA : 282 50. PT (NA) IMPERVIOUS AREA.- 1,363 5Q. PT (23.7%) I HOTS PORCH ON LOT 1 HAS 44A SQ. FT. ENCROACHMENT WTO SETBACK. AREAS LOT 2: ADDRESS 3625 54TH STREET WEST LOT AREA : 5,006:0. PT HOU5E AREA : 1,190 50. FT PORCH ARIA: 54 50. PT COVERED STOOP AM: 30 50. PT DECK AM. 120 50. PT (NA) FRONT 50MAM AREA : 44 50. PT (NA) DRIVEWAY AREA : 620 50. FT (NA) IMPERVIOUS AREA : 1.274 50. PT (25.4%) BENCHUARK- INN NW QUADRANT OF 54TH ST NEST AND LANE AVENUE. ELEV.-0118 SCALE : 1* - 20' Legal Description: LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK 1. DONNAY'S DREW ADOMON. auat4 � -T sum Sam 4 "BAG Tc cm rf Tc sa awe t RNA 01-V-/5: Ai)O E)W"N0 72e LOCUST TREF 7VANO VOSTPROPE RTY LNE. t %9ED 12-21.14: ADD DECO. WISE PORCH ON WT t. NAMM MAIMA CAIAXATIONS It"= PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOM AND RLMSEO 54T1�57REET WESff ! xaea.Y4 Aat2ey aarfdy that bids pton wm Prq+and. by ma or wAw my Met and Owt I em a day Lk and PmMalenol wedw Oa (sea M ON Slobs of Ybenawoto. -.mat nadwdy n tbt pa.u.ad M..4. ha tewporany a pwm+neiiSyeswed.'.,Lw►x.dh tenporay wxd ad drwr aAd apph.A d 2 fan. 2.9ahe dwtt b..,"" add tha beata,a Dawn a. th. Wn ald ~w a w O. -Ar... 5d fa,as abll b. wgaded wd .wwbwwa weeU/ (wN wtlm84 hn d. o.5'.aAaO a4d tad •wdaM ad n•t•en•3 Rw'avdeMwf d bt. S. A rod mwhl tM'oft- SW k watdled ad"m*x,.dd tb.,-, I, Jaw,a the ow, 4. Codnw*ww Pw"t eJd pwdaad wwdao aAet patreen. a as draw. wlda Not W .ecw...M.wR addwl 4vae a rcaA d memtb- hke pataea..wwamrnaw:e :4 romw w pbae and all..o.nwth pAxdd b. dadw.y. aAo as adJ hww bem datMuad. "d: o .t.dlm wy be.al.r.d ba h a ftmv o I mw re wkten e.rreep..dw,.e frees as C•r of EA. vuAtay Ila nea/ b. rewwal. ►cly of alga eWuda www m.peetm,eo ddaawa wch a4Jaadb proe. 04. Metwd Oc wadb. removed beb.. Imst Zan, ad Oda 9I d. Daws mat bs wablN N ab.,l 5th wadke. S. If down WuW 4 "A -t padtm a.t ara.laa/M: addwm,ul Tyadad aawa ccnbd p>drm vd b. webaa/ta ,edam bad,y. 6. Wd..,4.d w la. wky d the resat (alder. Tae F-4 WAW da.-.wAdwm4e dw4 OMmI MaeeFaep�aYia�e. - dwd-a 7. MWN*KtM at@K WATCCM 00TW7. (932) 641-0552 a.St aloamy JkA-d* aa,tedel. 9. Codadt pm.m fw.a. dealwe.s dad wwdaw.e. 010. Ja Greta. as aAwd canavb. Ow Oawwy K 10 91S409S. t0. W d. -W w,*ffA alowad a dft duck ba.d a.R agAa.a,wA wwhwR datum 1 I.Oi Jam m coy sftd. to ba dead ap wth nes. dry, ad Awrai d o e aaaard.u. ovate nmtavl. 12. AN b w,daw vada to b. deard w ad MpMM d p.. V'A dadwds. I dadmga pcaAan tz= O2wATERIMGswa* "ftc...U5A f 4W4G.1997/ no stwwww �«. wwe"to A.wdwwMetaiy m *a.""bpwae.t �•aar wmatf••r�randatm ,.pxbt. ata pd4t etwwwdweww9e ayaMw. . randadA.radmpaftad w tm S"W"and ..nwn.mbd da aw ova k=wd wkk paeedalpwMaywrwwe R4b.da flrwwwe ..w.3eAmmt west b..an.nd dad 4 w f/2 d. 2.414 a) t..tlwaat rdwaa.a- Awad. I , � < uj All 1§11h Egg Z7ff SYN r off of 111111 ~O J p a m WRI 19 'EST VEST 4- 00.94 X889-69 54TM 15TREET WE T N89066'21"E'-, CON 04-719MEAS E" 80Z?tAT1 Sao. o`SILIFENCE .59 9 59 1390.6 x Gas c _10 � CON' OST. ENTRANCEr K 4. IxGARAGE GA E 18. .6 L j 601 F- % i PROPOSED PROPOSED wCd a .01 HOUSE �HOV51ff 5? �\ I ISFUT LtvW .3rurkevW cn B. .0 am.Dem 4 0 tis 9? 17, " x 1/11 691.1179 41300.0 43 woo W 9 +-bT 110 A x .0 SILT FEN 888.0 p69 x §ZJQ 14_ P.W�00D�;W! as .8 80.00 PLAN"I 80.48 MEAS. olus GARAGE R '43'OM -?'TDUW IN REVISED 011-20-15: ADD EXISTING 22" LOCUST TREE ALONG WEST PROPERTY LINE. REVISED 12-24-14, ADD DECKS, REVISE PORCH ON LOT 1, REVISE IMPERVIOUS AREA CALCULATIONS, REVISE PORCH ENCROACHMENT NOTE, AND REVISED Lo'r NUMBERS. M xgekfi- LOT 5 9 888.6 888.3 Ott . a 12AS 10 eo EXISTING HOUSE J.S3 Bees (L 59 B SOUS 14—.39 511*GARAGIr: DRAWAal!* UT(UTY Mega w I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a tract as shown and described hereon. As prepared by me this 12D /MBER �01 4 WE W / Minn. Reg. No. 190E dm donnay homes a i i GODS ANAL756 wM rLAW va FfiZOI`T EL.EVAMON 3 �+TG 32 61em Om�do9 P�1.0'& PiD WNantbugm M Ow ® I=W AM- 21 SIDE ELEVATIONS s � a / a 3621 & 3625 i 54th Ave. So. EE [M]1_11EM ® ;UILDIN6, ELEVATIONS �A jLjO'" 1 1 FZEAF ELEVATION 5aeb VC•_, O Lam w - WiVIT AME:1 M OWIO RT PW - MIW JMIM AWS - AtMoflp WATERER "M 4" MARE - fiO YW*W= MAPLE 54TH ST1zEffT WAST AIA donnay 9�-spa Mps Gat Mre r 5x- eNIP 0. 3621 & 54th Avg M cling L -_ANDS PL., �� _,•.." °��"_�",�" LSM 1��zl1S N1 -b5 6315, 9Z9£ 4 TZ9£ Im ! i lfi99ZI i l ' r'OS i i I ! 1 J6I �9 I ! 0 I I � i I• I � ! I 'i I 11I O I I i I �nq" � I •o -n I I ! I I I I up up Dnp ! j I I I .wa j � 1 I I I I I O i i wed wed i j T. � _i I I ! I I ! I _ _ ! I I i I I I ! I ! I i I I i I I I j I I I ! I 13YU mel inl Oq aaa.lUOP I L WF) I DONNAY'S DREW ADDITION aA,MtIGWa NRPI.IaltMMML M.11wa YS. W Mrrilr.M lsr.rw r..Mr.w FXIaMMRr.a.rrFa.rwr.aeyfYYrrLMyrMehfrrlY+ww.[ IM.r,,rrawuMflaulwawafc.rw.r..MM..r C.R DOC. N0. — wrw.rw+�.%r•••�'�'rr.,.ma.sew.1fsnglrw.w�nsw�. r.rw.ar. W aa�wM, .Mrlrrl WIH1.Yr111..tl4.r.IM4�Ir�.rww,M.r,W.M..w.wn W ��ti r f_� .rU.i.N,MafS .rLtww.NMw _ 54TP SMREC 1 f -*E. x a efatraaatal NIl7sfre Mwna /OdOt11Y. M.r..wl.1..I.a.II.MMI1I.IwM�.Ir f�_4M1ri0wg.e/.WtrMrt p f � � �. .�� O..III+.YR•4�Hr./..'r+F.WMM1r.1aF I f � y My.w_rrr... Mf..rhr1 I a l I j1 't 2 ! I I o B L 0 K 1 Lmf.,ff. I rm......n.........I.IrW,aa..rr...... w I fJ ! � I I I . W I va,Wirll Mauer+ I St. ! '.w..«.I�,.n1.lr,rr......a..�..W,a..faatfaemaarlWrW.r.l.....r I .r.-� ti• .er.rr .rrrr..rtM.r.rwr.r.wr..r.r. r.w.rrw.fwf"r1 rrrr...r..r..r.ar.ts.rr.rt�Mf. a _ _ _ _ _ _.1 sr.�ilrrww rrf..11.wrwr.rrr.r.w a I 8 iL $ aJ1 � EOYY]MM wom �/plwlOsln ( �J uA.�.�IrwNrW M.M.MI M.rW�Mr m�.M...I.Yra I MrwrrMr. mr.Illie.n Iu..r.1,rM.r.r�.Mr m�,rgerlrY.Irr.rr.Mpt ffalM.fkr..wCrfYrsw r.r.a.r.fa�IMarr.rMr+rrwwrr_..nl a_, M MYwRIr1..O..Mw. l/IMIMf9Mff mMtst.rM.twMrr Ilwr rM Mrlr1..M.f�rlr Yr�Mr rw lrrrrr.l. MII.WM�rr I N...tr1...r. mffRC01g11.M.ywe.MfMM Ihr1YM••YIMY%.000IYIIMfIIICI�110pCi1wn�rrM WrMM�Y . a�� •�YrN��a I..FfrR1Yw IIfMFMftIlfl,tlW13. MtbN/.If IN 11tf ltlllllltf Ita AIAIatllitltlfltottHta`L � RTMafO�Kllbl a1ltteTaN.111fff1 f atrnena.xltaanf, r'� M1�t.�ll �fflLYOa mai: DATE: January 22, 2014 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director CC: David Fisher — Building Official Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer FROM: Charles Gerk EIT — Engineering Technician RE: 3621 & 3625 54th Street - Special Review of Variance Application The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Summary of Review Engineering has only minor concerns with the plans as submitted. The proposed plan appears to be the demolition and reconstruction of an existing two-family dwelling. The propose storm water management plan directs existing and additional drainage to the streets and away from nearby private property. The applicant will need to provide separate sanitary and water services for each address. The applicant will also need to apply for separate curb cut permits for each address. Grading and Drainage The proposed grading plans direct the drainage away from nearby private property and to the streets. This is accomplished VIA swales and a proposed berm. This condition will be an improvement for the neighboring properties over existing conditions. The storm sewer utility has capacity for the additional runoff and will not be affected. Erosion and Sediment Control No concerns Street and Curb Cert A separate curb cut permit will be required for each address. Water and Sanitary Utilities. Each address will require separate water and sanitary service connections. The water service connections will need to be a minimum of I" to the main for each address. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www EdinaMN.gov • 952-626-0371. Fax 952-826-0392 To: Planning Commissioners Agenda Item #: SL• A From: Karen M. Kurt, Assistant City Manager Action 11 Discussion 0 Date: January 28, 2015 Information Subject: Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Update (presentation) Action Requested: None. Information I Background: The Wooddale/Valley View Small Area Planning Team is in the final stages of developing a draft small area plan for the neighborhood commercial node at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road. Their work has included hosting three community workshops: October I I - Discovery Workshop • November 8 - Dream Workshop December 3 - Progress Update The draft small area plan is scheduled to be posted online at the end of the month. Comments from the Planning Commission will be solicited at the February I I meeting. The SAPT will consider comments from the Planning Commission and public before submitting a final draft at a public hearing tentatively scheduled for February 25. The anticipated timeline for the review and approval of the Plan is highlighted in the table below: Date Activity Jan 20 City Council Update Jan 28 Planning Commission Update Jan 30 -Feb 16 Post draft small area plan online for public comment Feb 18 WVV Small Area Planning Team reviews comments for final revision February 25 Public Hearing with Planning Commission March 3 Public Hearing with City Council City of Edina - 4801 W. 50d, St. - Edina, MN 55424