Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 HPB Meeting Minutes RegularJoyce Repya Phone 612 826-0369' 4801 West 50th Street Fax 612 826-0390 Edina, MN 55424 Memo To: Members of the Edina Heritage Preservation Board From: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner CC: File Date: January 20, 2000 Re: January 2000 meeting, etc. The regularly scheduled Heritage Preservation Board meeting for January 25� will not be held due to the lack of pressing business. Membership Update: John Cooney has decided not to continue serving on the Heritage Preservation Board. Mayor Maetzold has appointed Joan Schoening to fill the vacancy. Joan has been a resident of Edina for 30 years and served the school and community well in many volunteer/leadership roles. Joan has lived in two homes in the Country Club District and has a keen interest in the historic architecture. I'm sure you will join me in warmly welcoming Joan to the Board. • Page 1 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: October 19, 1999 II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: III. OTHER BUSINESS: IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: April 25, 2000 V. ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Marilyn Curtis, John McCauley, Herman Ratelle, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: Joan Schoening MEMBERS PRESENT: Joyce Repya I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Ratelle moved for approval of the minutes from the October 19, 1999, meeting. Mrs. Curtis seconded the motion, all voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Ms. Repya advised the Board that the City has received several inquiries regarding the possibility of demolishing homes in the Country Club District. The City Council has become aware of these inquiries and asked that the Heritage Preservation Board discuss this issue and provide advice. Ms. Repya reminded the Board that the Country Club District is listed on the National Register of Historic Place; recognized for the planning practices implemented when the district was developed, as well as the significant, well preserved concentration of historic revival architectural styles. The National Register designation constitutes an official recognition that the district is worthy of preservation, however, it in no way restricts activities in the district. The only means of control the City would have would be to add the Heritage Preservation District overlay zoning to the district. Ms. Repya pointed out that in 1980, when the National Register application was being considered, the question arose as to whether the district should also be zoned HPD. At that time, several issues entered into play which affected the decision not to add the HPD zoning classification: 1. The neighbors expressed concern about losing their property rights if all exterior modifications to their homes were subject to review and approval from the HPB, and 2. The Heritage Preservation Board also had concerns regarding their ability to oversee the modifications and improvements to the 554 homes. In 1992, the Board produced a brochure which did an excellent job of educating the district's residence about the significance of the neighborhood. Ms. Repya added that the planning staff has been pleased with most of the building activity which has taken place in Minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board - 3/28/00 Page 2 the district; pointing out that a majority of the work has shown sensitivity to the historic architecture of the dwellings. Mrs. Curtis shared photographs she had taken of homes in the district. Five photos illustrated homes which have had additions that compliment the historic architecture of the dwellings; two photos represent homes built since 1980 which are architecturally compatible with the district; and three photos represent contemporary homes constructed in the 1960's and 1970's which are incompatible with the historic architecture of the district. Mrs. Curtis also included some examples of new homes that have been rebuilt on lots in existing neighborhoods (not in the Country Club District) that are much larger and out of character to the surroundings. Mrs. Curtis warned that if we allow such rebuilds to occur in the Country Club District, the character of the district could be compromised and the National Register designation could be endangered. Mr. Nyberg pointed out that the City has received an inquiry about the ability to purchase two adjoining properties, tear down both homes and rebuild one home on both lots. Board members agreed that such an occurrence would be detrimental to the district, however, due to the lack of Heritage Preservation District zoning, something the City may not be able to control Mrs. Curtis commented that, If residents of the district were told that people may wish to rear down existing homes to build larger, newer ones, they aren't going to like it. Chairman Nyberg agreed with Mrs. Curtis, however pointed out that the same people would probably not be thrilled with regulations restricting such things as the color they paint their trim. Mrs. Curtis acknowledged that as the City's code now stands, if the Country Club District were to be zoned HPD, changes to the exterior of the homes would be regulated. However, she suggested that the Board entertain the idea of amending the code to loosen the regulations regarding exterior improvements. Mr. McCauley asked if, legally, people's rights can be taken away. Mr. Ratelle explained that it would be a tough call. People may feel that their rights are infringed upon. Chairman Nyberg stated that the very reason people like to live in the district is the fact that it is so unique and people haven't torn down houses. People take care of their homes. In one day there are countless numbers of contractor and repair trucks in the area. 2 Minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board - 3/28/00 Page 3 Ms. Repya explained that she researched the past 20 years of Heritage Preservation Board minutes and found the topic of rezoning the Country Club District was discussed six times, and each time the concerns were the same: • The workload to oversee exterior improvements to 554 homes would be overwhelming; and • When the National Register designation was proposed for the district, residents were assured that the historic designation would not interfere with their property rights. Ms. Repya went on to suggest that the Board may want to take a look at the Heritage Preservation District section of the ordinance to determine what changes could be made to make the rezoning of the Country Club District more palatable. Addressing the code at it currently stands, a permit is required for the following activities in an historic district: • Any remodeling, repairing or altering that will change in any manner the exterior appearance of a building • Moving a building • Destroying a building • Changing the appearance of the land, and • Constructing a new building. A brief discussion ensued among the Board regarding the trend of tearing down and rebuilding larger homes which aren't necessarily in character and scale with the surrounding neighborhood. It was agreed that since the Zoning Ordinance does not protect against this, the Country Club District could be affected if the Board does not address the issue. Mrs. Curtis pointed out the Edina's Country Club District was one of the first planned communities in the United States. When the homes were built 75 years ago there were strict restrictions that governed its development, and that is why today the district boasts the unique concentration of period revival architecture so well blended in scope and scale. Ms. Repya reminded the Board that Edina was one of the first communities to adopt a Zoning Ordinance in 1931, and it was fashioned after the deed restrictions in the Country Club District. Mr. McCauley asked if there were any historic districts in the area that have struggled with these issues. Ms. Repya explained that Minneapolis, St. Paul, Stillwater and Red Wing all have historic districts, however, each structure in those districts is subject to design review. Referring to an information booklet published by the National Trust addressing design review in historic districts, Mrs. Curtis pointed out that most ordinances provide for 3 Minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board - 3128100 Page 4 ro ert owners against changes which affect the exterior of c district ordinances structure,pegulat the protection ag wish Typically, historic free to modify interiors as they ipatibility with neighboring buildings. We design of new construction as well, iv dual structures affect the entire district. F u ha rmore, need to be concerned with how property owners g P their own properties in order to protect the character Mrs. Curtis shared that in each historic district individual prop historic measure of control over the looks as well as a ' hborhood as a whole. With time, it has d local economy protecting of their neig resources yielded additional benefits; ide strengt ene strengthened sense of community p storic neighborhoods because they Chairman Nyberg opined ined that people buy into hi he end toward gated in an area where there are some controls. ecaruse of he protection and want to live o pular is attractive communities which has become sop s stated that the charge of the Heritage Preservation Board is to controls. Mrs. Curn maintain heritage preservation. oard is advisory to the ChairmY an N berg observed that the Heritage Presee added hat he Board has a City Council and must be true to historic preseryation. responsibility to be proactive. Wray stated that he felt most people would view the historic zoning as Mr. W Y imposition by restrictions. protection for their neighborhood rather than an imp a in the Country Curtis agreed and reiterated that most people choose to live Mrs. pointed out that over the years Club District because of the neighborhood. She also p d members people have asked her how the Board could have allowed various changes a ges in the district. The answer has been that the district occurred in this not le district ly ov'er the past decade since trealize the discussed the turnover whe hich has occ at some information brochure was produced. It was agreed ct its characte dents may no history of their neighborhood and the need to protect roaches that could be Chairman Nyberg summarized that the Board has several app take toward the Country Club District: f nnrard to and maintain the status quo, hoping no one comes o 1. Do nothing endanger the character of the request a tear down or other measure that would endang ein district..isting code that would entail overseeing 2. Rezone the district under tl� 554he homes, oring district while not any exterior change 3. Amend the code to provide protectionaior the ce to the 554 homes. na requiring the review of repairs and m in to the National Trust booklet on historic districts not Mrs. Curtis, again referring would however, it out that it is not the in of the Board to soifnleecreativity, nsltruct a new one, e necessarily deny one the right to demolish a would ensure that m that event, the new construction would not disrupt the continuity of 4 MW A Minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board - 3/28/00 Page 5 district; elements such as building height, scale, orientation, spacing and site coverage would all be addressed not only as if affects the individual lot, but how it ties into the district as a whole. The question was raised as to whether the rezoning to Historic Preservation District for the Country Club District would set a precedence for other neighborhoods in the City. It was agreed that when the district was planned and constructed in the 1920's, the dye was cast as to the type of community Edina would become. Mrs. Curtis observed that the Country Club has already been recognized as historically significant as evidenced by the National Register distinction. It is the job of the Heritage Preservation Board to keep preserving what is identified as historically important. Board members agreed that they would like to see the Country Club District zoned Heritage Preservation District to protect the character and integrity of the neighborhood; however, they also agreed that they do not feel that the requirement that repairs and alterations to each of the 554 homes (as the code now requires) would be realistic or necessary in the district. Mr. Ratelle cited that before the rezoning can be recommended, the ordinance needs to be amended to allow flexibility in addressing the preservation of a district when compared to an individual property. Mr. Ratelle moved that the Board present a proposed amendment of Section 850.20 of the Zoning Ordinance to the City Council which would address the unique needs of a historic district in protecting the streetscape, scale, original plat and the historic integrity of the area. Donald Wray seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Edina Historical Society Membership Ms. Repya explained that Mr. McCauley has represented the Heritage Preservation Board on the Edina Historical Society Board for many years. Mr. McCauley has resigned his seat on the Historical Society Board, and the HPB now needs to appoint a new member to serve in his place. Donald Wray indicated that he would be willing to represent the HPB on the Historical Society Board. No formal action was taken. B. Workshop: Building Codes and Historic Buildings Chairman Nyberg reported that he would like to attend an upcoming workshop for Heritage Preservation Boards. The workshop will address how property owners, architects and local officials can work together to maintain the architectural integrity of historic buildings; it will be held at Fairbault City Hall, on Friday, April 28, 2000. Board members agreed that the workshop would be worthwhile. No formal action was taken. 5 Minutes of the Heritage Preservation Board - 3/28/00 Page 6 C. Neighborhood Study Report 0 Ms. Repya updated the Board on the progress of her research into Edina neighborhoods. Thus far she has identified approximately 27 neighborhoods platted from as early as 1883 (West Minneapolis Heights) to Dewey Hill in 1978. A brief discussion ensued. No formal action was taken. 1V. NEXT MEETING DATE: April 25, 2000 V. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 6 Cl AGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: March 28, 2000 II. 4505 WOODDALE AVENUE: Tear Down/Rebuild III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT PROPOSED REZONING TO HPD IV. BUILDING CODES AND HISTORIC BUILDINGS WORKSHOP: April 28, 2000, Report from Mr. Nyberg V. OTHER BUSINESS: VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 27, 2000 VII. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Marilyn Curtis, Herman Ratelle, Joan Schoening, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: John McCauley STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya OTHERS PRESENT: Paul Hannan, Architect I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Ratelle moved to approve the minutes from the March 28, 2000, meeting. Mrs. Curtis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT - 4505 WOODDALE AVENUE: Ms. Repya advised the Board that the home at 4505 Wooddale Avenue is an English Cottage style built in 1925. The property was recently sold and the new owner is planning to demolish the home and rebuild on the site. Ms. Repya and Chairman Nyberg had previously met with Mr. Paul Hannan, architect for the new owner, and reviewed the plans for the proposed house. Ms. Repya explained that the new home will be a New England Colonial Revival style constructed of either brick or stone (as yet undetermined), with a 3 - car, side -loading, attached garage in the year yard. The driveway will be moved from the north side of the house to the south side; it will share a curb cut and run adjacent to the neighbor's driveway. The Proposed house meets all setback and lot coverage requirements of the city code, thus no variances will be required. The demolition is tentatively scheduled for July with new construction to commence in August. Ms. Repya reminded the Board that in 1987 and 1992 two of the most recent new homes were constructed in the district. In both cases, HPB approval of the plans was a condition of variances approved for the properties. Since no variances are required for the subject property, HPB approval of the plans can not be required. However, Ms. Repya added that she and Chairman Nyberg were impressed with Mr. Hannan's plans for the property and asked him to pay the Board the courtesy of sharing the plans. Ms. Repya then introduced Mr. Paul Hannan to the Board. Mr. Hannan distributed copies of the exterior elevations and a site plan of the property and proceeded to describe the proposed house. Mr. Hannan explained that the home will be a New England Colonial Revival. The exterior finish will be either brick or rock and will be used throughout to include the garage. The roof material will be either slate or cedar shingles depending upon the budget and the exterior finish. The windows are proposed to be double hung and the details of the home will include dentil mouldings and workable shutters, all of which are consistent • with the New England Colonial Revival style. Mr. Hannan pointed out that the house will be approximately 5,000 square feet of finished space. There will be 9 Y2 foot ceilings on the main floor and four bedrooms on the second level. Although the proposed home will be larger than the existing home, Mr. Hannan observed that the curb appeal for the proposed home will be less imposing on the lot; noting that it will be set deeper into the lot and provide greater setbacks on both side yards. Mr. Hannan added that the new owners currently live in the Country Club District and are very aware of the area's history. They made it clear that their new home must maintain the neighborhood's character. Once the final renderings are available, a meeting will be scheduled with the neighbors to inform them of the project. Mrs. Schoening asked for clarification of the new driveway. Mr. Hannan explained that the new house will share a curb cut with the house to the South, however the driveways will be abutting. There will not be a shared driveway serving both homes. 04, Board members briefly discussed the plans, expressing that the home will appear to complement the district. Chairman Nyberg then thanked Mr. Hannan for sharing the plans with the Board and wished him luck with the project. No formal action was taken. COUNTRY CLUB PROPOSED REZONING TO HPD: Ms. Repya reminded the Board that at their last meeting they had agreed to propose an amendment to the HPD section of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for more flexibility when addressing the preservation of the Country Club District. Ms. Repya explained that she had asked for advice from Charles Nelson of the Minnesota Historical Society as to how the district could be locally zoned Historic Preservation District without requiring scrutiny of all exterior modifications to the district's 550 homes. Mr. Nelson indicated that recognizing the district could be quite simple and the ordinance would not have to be rewritten. He suggested that a sentence be added to indicate that properties which collectively make up a district designation will be subject to the design review guidelines for that district. The guidelines would then serve as the tool the Board would use to advise and support decisions made relative to demolitions, new construction and any other elements identified as important to control. Ms. Repya suggested that prior to amending the ordinance or rezoning the district, the design review guidelines should be written and adopted. Once the guidelines are in place, the potential rezoning of the district would go much smoother, because naturally, if the properties are going to be subject to design review guidelines, the residents will want to see and understand the guidelines. Ms. Repya pointed -out that creation of the design review guidelines would probably qualify for a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant to assist in the funding of the project. Grant applications are due in February 2001, and if approved, the work could commence in June 2001. Discussion ensued regarding the changes that have taken place in the district since 1980 when it was placed on the National Register of Historic Places. Board members agreed that for the most part, the changes have not detrimentally affected the historic integrity of the district; however, the changes that occurred in the 1960's and 1970's when the contemporary homes were built should not be duplicated. Ms. Repya explained that with design review guidelines for the district, change would not necessarily be discouraged, however it would be controlled. When asked what action the Board should take at this time, Ms. Repya suggested that the plans to rezone the district to Heritage Preservation Distrsict be put on the back burner. As she pointed out earlier, the prudent first step might be to create design review guidelines for the district which would then serve as the foundation for further action. Since the CLG grant schedule for 2000 has passed, the next cycle will start in February 2001 with work commencing in June 2001. Board members agreed to start preservation efforts in the Country Club District with establishing design review guidelines, following the CLG grant schedule for 2001. No formal action was taken. III. BUILDING CODES & HISTORIC BUILDINGS WORKSHOP: Chairman Nyberg reported that he attended the Building Codes & Historic Buildings Workshop in Faribault, MN, on April 28, 2000. The purpose of the workshop was to convey how preservationists can work within the state's building code to achieve their goals and still comply with code requirements. The presenters made it clear that the state is anxious to work with cities and architects to solve problems. The codes are not relaxed, however they attempt to work creatively to achieve the best results. The workshop was held in the Fairbault City Hall, a beautiful historic S building dating back to 1894. The site was chosen because it is an excellent example of a historic structure that has been undergoing renovation for the past five years. Many of the examples of the building codes being applied to a historic building were easy to point out to the workshop participants. The afternoon session included a walking tour of downtown Fairbault, visiting two buildings currently under renovation. Chairman Nyberg stressed that he really appreciated the attitude of the building inspectors. They indicated that they want to work together toward meeting the requirements of the building codes while still being sensitive to the historic integrity of a project. Board members thanked Chairman Nyberg for his report and for representing Edina at the workshop. No formal action was taken. VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 27, 2000 VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 5 Joyce Repya Phone 612 826-0369 4801 West 50"' Street Fax 612 826-0390 Edina, MN 55424 Memo To: Heritage Preservation Board From: Joyce Repya CC: File Date: June 23, 2000 Re: June 2000 Meeting The regularly scheduled meeting for Tuesday, June 27th will not be held due to a lack of subject matter. UPDATE: 4510 BRUCE AVENUE You will recall that JMS Homes had purchased 4510 Bruce Avenue, however, at your last meeting we had no information regarding their plans for the home. Since then, I have met several times with Robb Plagemann, a representative from JMS Homes. Initially, JMS had purchased the home with the intentions of upgrading the exterior and adding a bedroom addition to the rear; they would then sell the home. Shortly after our meeting, Mr. Plagemann asked for another meeting explaining that JMS has a buyer for the house that wants to remove the house and rebuild on the site. Mr. Plagemann explained that JMS is in the process of designing the home for the site. He indicated that the buyer is very open to the architectural style of the home, and asked what the HPB would like to see. I advised him that since the existing home is an English Cottage, that might be a good choice; pointing out that the English Cottage lends itself well to the narrower (50 foot) lots in the district. I also directed him to the Northwestern Architectural Archives at the University of Minnesota for further research in historic architecture. I suspect Mr. Plagemann will have plans ready for you to review sometime in July or August. I will keep you posted. 0 Page 1 Joyce Repya Phone 612 826-0369 4801 West 50th Street Fax 612 826-0390 Edina, MN 55424 Memo To: Heritage Preservation Board From: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner CC: File Date: August 18, 2000 Re: August 22nd Meeting The regularly scheduled meeting for Tuesday, August 22, 2000, will not be held due to a lack of pressing business. Since our last correspondence, I've heard nothing from the folks proposing the tear -down at 4510 Bruce Avenue. As soon as I hear anything, you'll be the first to know. Hope you're enjoying your summer! 0 Page 1 n U AGENDA RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2000, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50T" STREET I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 23, 2000 10 II. 495 BRUCE AVENUE: Teardown/Rebuild III. OTHER BUSINESS: IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: October 24, 2000 V. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, OCTOBER 3, 2000., AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Marilyn Curtis, John McCauley and Herman Ratelle MEMBERS ABSENT: Joan Schoening, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya OTHERS PRESENT: Robb Plagemann, JMS Homes I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mrs. Curtis moved to approve the minutes from the May 23, 2000, meeting. Mr. Ratelle seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. 4510 BRUCE AVENUE, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Chairman Nyberg advised the Board that the home at 4510 Bruce Avenue is an English Cottage style built in 1925. Recently, JMS Homes purchased the property and is proposing to demolish the existing home and rebuild on the site. Ms. Repya pointed out that JMS Homes has met with City Staff while designing the proposed home and indicated that no variances will be required; that being the case, design review by the Heritage Preservation Board is not required, however as a courtesy, JMS Homes has agreed to share the proposed building plans with the HPB and is open to design suggestions. Mr. Robb Plagemann, representing JMS Homes explained that his company originally purchased the subject home with the intent of remodeling and updating it to then offer it for sale. However, Sean and Elizabeth Kearney approached JMS with the offer of purchasing the home, tearing it down and rebuilding a new home on the site. Mr. Plagemann pointed out that although the original home was identified as an English Cottage style, it was categorized as "weak", since there are few significant architectural features associated with that design style. Furthermore, hot water heat and a detached garage were deterrents which entered into the decision to rebuild on the site. Prior to the house being torn down, the Green Institute will remove salvageable items from the home i.e. light fixtures, doors, etc, which will be reused by the building trades. Presenting the plans to the Board, Mr. Plagemann explained that the 50 foot lot was challenging from a design standpoint. The proposed house will be the same width as the original structure, however it will be deeper and somewhat taller from the peak of the gable. Architecturally, the proposed home will have numerous gables with a mock timber swooping entry; it will be constructed of stucco and stone, all elements consistent with the English cottage design style. Chairman Nyberg stated that the proposal appeared to have Craftsman design elements, especially in the front entry. He pointed out that the front sloping eave line appeared weak, and suggested that adding heavier timber trim under the eave line would strengthen the design. Mrs. Curtis questioned whether the front porch was consistent with the English Cottage design style. Chairman Nyberg indicated that the front entry is so small that it doesn't serve the purpose of a porch, but more just protection from the elements. He added that he thought it was a nice addition. Mrs. Curtis agreed, but pointed out that she would like to see the stone used on the exterior of the porch continued around the foundation and perhaps on the chimney which is consistent with the English Cottage design style. Addressing the back of the home, Chairman Nyberg opined that it looked rather plain; the addition of trim around the windows would be helpful. Also, adding three windows in the garage facing west would help to break up the solid wall. Regarding the second story on the south elevation, Chairman Nyberg pointed out that the inconsistent size of the windows looked haphazard; he would prefer to see smaller windows, all the same size for continuity and balance. Mr. McCauley questioned the narrow driveway and the ability to access the side loading garage. Mr. Plagemann agreed that it will be tight with limited space to turn around, however that is the nature of the narrow lots. • The Board discussed the front door which has side light and transom windows surrounding the square wooden door, reminiscent of the Craftsman design style. Mr. Plagemann indicated that he would explore an arched doorway which would be consistent with the sloping roofline of the English Cottage design style. Following a brief discussion, Board members thanked Mr. Plagemann for sharing the plans with them. Mr. Plagemann, in turn, thanked the Board for their input, adding that once the final building plans have been completed, he would forward a copy to them. No formal action was taken. III. OTHER BUSINESS: None IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: October 24, 2000 V. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Heritage Preservation Board FROM: Joyce Repya "')UBJECT: November 28, 2000 Meeting and Rescheduled December 19, 2000 Meeting DATE: November 17, 2000 The regularly scheduled meeting for Tuesday, November 28, 2000 will not be held due to a lack of subject matter. You will soon receive an invitation from the Mayor for a joint meeting with the City Council on December 19th at 6:00 p.m. To make the most of the evening, I have planned the regular December HPB meeting to follow at 7:00 p.m. in the Lower Level Conference Room. At that time we will discuss the CLG grant application for the Country Club District Design Review Guidelines which is due to the State in January. Until December 19th, have a festive and safe Thanksgiving holiday! AGENDA RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2000, AT 6:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 West 50" Street I. JOINT MEETING WITH THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL (Box lunches will be served) 7:00 P.M. MOVE TO LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: October 3, 2000 III. CLG GRANT APPLICATION: Design Review Guidelines for the Country Club District IV. OTHER BUSINESS: V. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 23, 2001 VI. ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2000, AT 6:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Marilyn Curtis, Herman Ratelle, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, John McCauley and Joan Schoening STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya I. JOINT MEETING WITH THE EDINA CITY COUNCL: Ms. Repya referred to the Board's CLG Annual Report when explaining the work the HPB had undertaken over the past year. Looking ahead, concern for the teardown of homes in the Country Club District was indicated as a topic that will be addressed in the coming year; as well as continuing research into the neighborhoods in the City. Discussion ensued regarding the impact the teardown of houses in the Country Club District could have on the National Register designation. Mrs. Curtis pointed out that so far, the Board has been fortunate to receive a courtesy review of the plans for the replacement homes. Currently, there is nothing in the city codes to require design review for homes in the Country Club District because the district is not locally zoned Heritage Preservation Overlay District. Council members asked for clarification of Heritage Preservation Overlay District. Ms. Repya explained that all properties which possess the HPD overlay zoning designation are subject to Heritage Preservation Board review and approval of all modifications to the exteriors of the structures and grounds. Currently, only three private homes possess the HPD zoning designation. At the time the Country Club District was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places in the early 1980's, it was decided that design review of the 550 homes would be a daunting responsibility for the HPB and city staff. However, now as the teardown of homes has become a reality, the HPB is looking at the possibility modifying the city code by creating design review guidelines for the district that would address teardowns and major changes without requiring I review of new roofs, repainting and general maintenance that is currently a requirement of the HPD district properties. Discussion ensued regarding the need for more teeth to control changes in the district. It was agreed that since the National Register designation in 1980, there have been very few detrimental changes to homes in the district. It was suggested that a survey be circulated to the Country Club residents to gain their perspective of the changes occurring in their neighborhood. The City needs to know the threshold of involvement the homeowners are willing to tolerate. Council members expressed support for the HPB creating design review guidelines that would not necessarily discourage change in the district, but would control the changes to ensure that the district remains a cohesive concentration of period architecture homes. Mayor Maetzold thanked the Heritage Preservation Board for meeting with the Council to acquaint them with their current mission and goals. The Heritage Preservation Board then moved to the Lower Level Conference Room to continue their meeting. II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Ratelle moved for approval of the minutes from the October 3, 2000, meeting. Lois Wilder seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. CLG GRANT APPLICATION: Ms. Repya reminded the Board that at their May 23, 2000, meeting they had agreed to pursue a Certified Local Government Grant to finance the creation of Design Review Guidelines for the Country Club District. The proposed guidelines would serve as a tool to educate, and if need be, regulate changes occurring in the district. Ms. Repya pointed out that the deadline for draft CLG applications to be submitted to the Minnesota Historical Society. Because the CLG grants must have a 50% match, it was suggested that the match come from in-kind (City staff as well as HPB Board member time) as well as a grant request from the Edina Community Foundation. This was the same match funding which supported the Historic Context Study Grant the HPB received in 1998. Board members agreed that would be a wise approach. Ms. Repya explained that the completed draft application would be available for the Board to review at their next meeting, January 23, 2001. No formal action was taken. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: ■ Membership Ms. Repya advised the Board that Joan Schoening no longer lives in Edina, thus was no longer be eligible to serve on the Heritage Preservation Board. Since the Mayor will be making appointments to the Boards and Commissions in February, Ms. Repya asked the Board to think of fellow residents they may know of who would have the interest and expertise to serve on the Board, and ask them to request an application from the City Clerk. On a related note, Mrs. Curtis announced that her family has purchased a home in Minnetonka, thus she will no longer be able to serve on the Board; which means there will be two openings on the Board. Board members expressed their sadness at losing Mrs. Curtis as a Board member. No formal action was taken. V. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 23, 2001 VI. ADJOURNMENT: 7:30 p.m. Resp tfully submitted, 7