HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005 HPB Meeting Minutes RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: December 14, 2004
II. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN: Vision — Outcome/Benchmarks (continued)
III. PRESERVATION MONTH PLANNING — May 2005 (Heritage Award)
IV. PRESERVE AMERICA PROGRAM
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
VII. NEXT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, March 8, 2005
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50T" STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bill Crawford, Bob Kojetin,
Peggy Jennings, and Marie Thorpe
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Kojetin moved for approval of the minutes from the December 14, 2004
meeting. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
II. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN OUTLINE: Vision
Planner Repya reminded the Board that they had discussed the "Vision" section
of the plan at the December 14th meeting, continuing the item to this meeting to
gain clarification from Consultant Vogel on the following identified benchmark
points:
Benchmark 1. Regarding the requirement to identify and evaluate all
buildings more than 40 years old, Mr. Vogel explained that while today, 1980
seems pretty recent, by 2020 the perspective will be much different and the
buildings of the 70's and 80's will appear much more interesting.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that the inventory would not be that difficult. There will
basically be two categories: 1. Buildings owned by people of notoriety, and
2. Significant architectural styles (which will actually fall within categories
easily identified).
Chairman Nyberg asked if there was potential for identifying Southdale Mall
as a landmark property. Mr. Vogel explained that there have been too many
Minutes — February 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
changes over the years — the original mall is no longer visible. However,
there are objects within the mall — statuary, the clock, etc. that might qualify.
Benchmark 2. Regarding the wisdom of identifying specific neighborhoods
for surveys, Mr. Vogel pointed out that this point was taken from the Historic
Context Study. If the Board viewed this as a problem, there are other ways to
identify areas of the city.
Benchmark 5. Addressing why archaeological surveys would be carried out
for all undeveloped lands within the city limits, Mr. Vogel explained that the
city could only require an archaeological survey for private property if a
project was to be undertaken on the site. He added that the areas of most
concern would be those near water bodies. Board members discussed the
types of archaeology that might be required.
Benchmark 6. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the words "voluntary and non -
regulatory" are at the core of the new Heritage Landmark Ordinance. He
observed that this is a very wise approach to preservation because it not only
fosters good will with the residents, but it also lowers the cost of preservation.
He added that thus far, the voluntary compliance appears to be working quite
well.
Benchmark 7. Mr. Vogel explained that this point which provides for fully
integrating historic preservation with other city planning for parks, recreation,
community development, public safety, public works and education can easily
be the first benchmark.
Responding to a question as to whether the Board should vote on approval of
the "Vision" section of the plan, Mr. Vogel explained that the Board would not be
voting on each section. Probably by next fall, once all sections have been
discussed, he will present a final document. At that time, the Board will move for
approval of the entire plan, which will then be passed on to the Planning
Commission and City Council for their comments. A brief discussion ensued.
No formal action was taken.
III. PRESERVATION MONTH PLANNING: MAY 2005
Mr. Vogel explained that Preservation Week has been expanded to include the
entire month of May. The following events are being considered:
HERITAGE AWARD - As in previous years, Edina will be awarding the third annual
Heritage Award. Ms. Repya shared the request for nominations that will appear in
the spring issue of "About Town" as well as in the Edina Sun Current, Southwest
Journal, Edina Chamber publications and Edina's "About Business" magazine.
Board members were pleased with the press coverage. Discussion ensued
regarding when the Board would review the nominations. Planner Repya pointed out
2
Minutes — February 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
that there should be at least a two-week lead-time for the plaques to be engraved.
Board members then agreed that a special meeting of the Board should take place
on Monday, April 18th to review the applications and vote on a winner.
BAIRD HOUSE TOUR — Planner Repya reminded the Board that Brad and Arlene
Forrest, owners of the Baird House had originally invited the Board to tour their
home in December. Due to scheduling conflicts, the tour has been postponed until
the springtime. Board members agreed that because May was Preservation Month,
that would be an excellent time to reschedule. Planner Repya agreed to contact the
Forrests to discuss a date in May that would work best for the tour.
IV. PRESERVE AMERICA PROGRAM:
Consultant Vogel explained that the "Preserve America Program" is a White House
initiative that encourages and supports community efforts to preserve and enjoy
cultural and natural heritage. Communities may apply for special designation as a
Preserve America Community in recognition of their efforts to protect and celebrate
their heritage; use their historic assets for economic development and community
revitalization; and encourage people to experience and appreciate local historic
resources through education and heritage tourism programs.
Chairman Nyberg asked how Edina would benefit by the designation. Mr. Vogel
explained that the benefits of designation would include:
White House recognition
A certificate of recognition
Authorization to use the "Preserve America" logo on signs, flags,
banners and promotional materials
Listing in a Web -based "Preserve America" Community directory
Inclusion in national and regional press releases
Official notification of designation to State tourism offices and visitor
bureaus
Enhanced community visibility and pride
Member Kojetin observed that the program sounded very similar to the "Tree City
U.S.K program that the City has participated with in the past. Mr. Vogel agreed,
pointing out that it would not really entail any additional work for the Board, however
the City would be recognized for the strides made in heritage preservation.
Member Kojetin added that in addition to all the Heritage Preservation Board has
done to advance heritage preservation, the Cahill School Program, which provides a
one -room school house experience for over 5,000 students from around the state
would surely qualify for recognition.
Following a brief discussion, Board members agreed that in light of the fact that the
program would be of no cost to the City, and could indeed serve to enhance the
K,
Minutes — February 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
City's heritage preservation efforts, it would be worth pursuing . Member Kojetin
then moved that the City commence the application process to become a "Preserve
America" Community. Member Jennings seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried. Consultant Vogel explained that he would complete the application
and keep the Board advised of the progress.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS: None
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: March 8, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 7:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Repya
4
AGENDA
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: February 8, 2005
II. 2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Overview & Discussion
III. 2005 GOALS & OBJECTIVES:
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Edina Heritage Award
B. Edina Theater Sign — Heritage Landmark Designation Update
VII. NEXT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, April 12, 2005
VIII. ADJOURNMENT:
MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 8, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bill Crawford, Peggy Jennings,
Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster, and Karen Ferrara
MEMBERS ABSENT: Vice Chairman Bob Kojetin, David Runyan and Ian Yue
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Chairman Nyberg opened the meeting with words of welcome and introductions
for Lou Blemaster and Karen Ferrara, new members joining the Board.
Additionally, he announced that not in attendance are David Runyan
representing the Planning Commission and Ian Yue a student member.
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Jennings moved for approval of the minutes from the February 8, 2005
meeting. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
II. 2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Planner Repya referred to the 2004 Annual Report submitted to the Minnesota
State Historical Society as a requirement for being a Certified Local Government.
The report identifies the heritage landmark designated properties and highlights
the Board activities for the year. She pointed out that a majority of the Board's
time was spent reviewing Certificates of Appropriateness for detached garages
in the Country Club District.
Board members agreed that after reviewing 11 plans for garages it has been
helpful to compare size and heights of the structures to gain perspective on the
type of accessory structures that meet the modern needs of homeowners as well
as what new construction is appropriate to impose in the historic district.
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
i
Member Jennings stated that she finds the statistic sheet comparing the square
footage, heights and roof pitches of all the garages addressed thus far to be
most helpful. She added that the additional guidelines provided for the detached
garages should be a useful tool for those proposing new garages as well as for
the Board when reviewing the proposals.
Board members agreed that 2004 was a very busy, productive year. All
indicated that they looked forward to continuing the advancement of Edina's
heritage preservation efforts. No formal action was taken.
III. 2005 GOALS & OBJECTIVES:
Consultant Vogel provided the following list of suggested goals and objectives to
consider for the coming year:
1. Carry out reconnaissance survey of the Minnehaha Creek corridor to
identify historic structures and landscapes worthy of preservation.
2. Nominate a minimum of two properties for designation as Edina Heritage
Landmarks.
3. Prepare a draft comprehensive historic preservation plan for adoption by
the City Council in 2006.
4. Increase efforts to provide city officials with information, education, and
training in historic preservation.
5. Apply for inclusion in the Preserve America Program.
6. Work with the City Engineer and other city departments to ensure that
historic properties are taken into account in planning for public works
improvements.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that it is not uncommon for Board's to "bite off more than they
can chew", and it is important to be realistic relative to amount of work staff can
accomplish in a given year. He added that the items listed have been identified in
the Historic Context Study and should fit in well with reviewing the Certificates of
Appropriateness applications from the Country Club District.
Board members discussed the goals and agreed that next year when reviewing the
year's activities, the list will be helpful. Mr. Vogel pointed out that in keeping with the
comprehensive historic preservation plan they are working on, it is a good idea for
the Board to get into the habit of establishing outcome or performance based
activities.
Member Crawford then moved to adopt the 2005 goals and objectives provided by
Consultant Vogel. Member Jennings seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
2
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
IV. ELECTION OF OFFICERS:
Member Jennings moved to nominate Gary Nyberg to continue serving as Chairman
and Bob Kojetin as Vice Chairman of the Board. Member Crawford seconded the
motion. Chairman Nyberg stated that he would be happy to continue serving as
chairman. Planner Repya explained that although Member Kojetin is not in
attendance, she had asked him if he would be willing to continue serving the Board
in a leadership position if nominated, and he indicated he would. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
V. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Edina Heritage Award
Planner Repya presented the press release inviting nominations for the 2005
Edina Heritage Award. She indicated that the notice will appear in the Edina Sun
Current, Edina Chamber of Commerce, Edina Magazine, EpiCenter Business
Journal, Edina Resource Center and Edina Public Schools publications. Board
members agreed that they are hopeful to receive several nominations from which to
choose. The deadline for applications is April 15th. Chairman Nyberg, Member
Jennings and Member Kojetin had agreed to meet on April 18th to review the
applications and make a recommendation for the recipient. No further action was
taken.
B. Edina Theater Sign
Planner Repya reminded the Board that she and Mr. Vogel had met with
Gene Haugland, owner of the theater and discussed the possibility of pursuing
heritage landmark designation for the theater sign. Mr. Haugland indicated that he
would be interested in pursuing the designation and asked staff to put together a
proposed plan of treatment for him to review.
Chairman Nyberg asked if the marquee is included when talking about the
theater sign. Discussion ensued regarding whether the marquee should be
included. Mr. Nyberg pointed out that the marquee helps to identify the theater sign
and gives it purpose. He stated that he would like the marquee to be included in the
designation — Board members agreed.
Consultant Vogel explained that a landmark designation takes at least two
months on the short side, but more likely three months to go from beginning to end.
Once the Heritage Preservation Board has approved the nomination study, it is sent
on to the Minnesota State Historical Society who has 60 days to submit their
comments. Keeping the time schedule in mind, the nomination study could be
3
Minutes — March 8, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
ready for the next meeting in April, and it would be realistic to consider taking the
landmark designation to the City Council in June or July
C. Hennepin County Historical Society Membership
Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that at least one member of the
Heritage Preservation Board must serve on the Hennepin County Historical Society.
Chairman Nyberg advised Mr. Vogel that he is a member of the County's Historical
Society.
D. Morningside Centennial Event
Planner Repya announced that the Morningside Centennial Planning
Committee has organized an event in which Barbara Bezat of the Northwest
Architectural Archives at the University of Minnesota will teach a class entitled "How
to Research the History of Your House". The class will take place on Saturday,
March 12th from 10 to 11:30 a.m. at the Edina -Morningside Community Church,
4201 Morningside Road. The class is open to all for a $5.00 fee per person.
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: April 12, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Repya
4
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: March 8, 2005
II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. H-05-1 4604 Bruce Avenue
Demolish Detached Garage and Construct a new Detached Garage
III. PRESERVATION MONTH — May
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Historic Site Location Map — Discussion
B. Preservation of Historic Catalpa Trees & Other Rare Boulevard Trees — Discussion
C. Highway 100/Minnnehaha Creek Soundwall — Project Update
D. 50t Anniversary of Southdale Mall — October 8, 1956
E. Comprehensive Preservation Plan — Update
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: Tuesday, May 10, 2005
VI. ADJOURNMENT:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50"' STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Crawford, Peggy Jennings, Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster,
Karen Ferrara, David Runyan and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Jennings moved for approval of the minutes from the March 8, 2005
meeting. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. H-05-1 4604 Bruce Avenue
Demolish Detached Garage/Construct a New Detached Garage
Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the
4600 block of Bruce Avenue. The home is a 1927 Mediterranean with Italian
Renaissance Revival Influence. A 2 -car detached garage is located in the northwest
corner of the lot, accessed by a driveway running along the south property line.
The subject request involves demolishing the existing substandard 374 square foot
(18'x 20') detached garage and building a new detached garage in its place. The
plan illustrates the new structure will maintain the same setback as the existing
garage, 3.9 feet from the north property line and 14.9b feet from the west property
line; a minimum 3 foot setback is required. A new curb cut is not required since the
existing driveway will provide access to the proposed garage.
Minutes — April 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Ms. Repya pointed out that the new detached garage is proposed to be 484 square
feet in area, measuring 22'x 22'. The design of the structure is proposed to
compliment the architectural style of the home, incorporating stucco walls and a tiled,
hip roof. The garage floor is proposed to be several feet below grade on the rear and
sides to accommodate the elevation of the lot. The height of the proposed garage is
shown to be 14 feet at the highest peak in the front and 17 feet in the rear. The
height at the eave line is porosed to be 7 feet at the front and 10 feet at the rear. The
lot coverage for the property will increase from 27.3% to 29%. A maximum lot
coverage of 30 % is allowed.
The closest adjacent structure, the home to the north at 4602 Bruce Avenue is a 1972
Contemporary with an attached garage on the north side, in front of the home. The
height of the home is 19 feet to the peak, considerably taller than the 14 foot height
proposed for the subject garage.
In closing, Ms. Repya observed that Edina's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 2 -
car garage in the R-1 zoning district. The proposed 22' x 22', detached garage is
standard for a 2 -car garage, and no variances from the Zoning Ordinance will be
required for the proposed plan. Furthermore, the plans provided clearly illustrate the
scale and scope of the project relative to the principle home and adjacent properties;
and appear to clearly meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country
Club District. Plan of Treatment. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the request
to demolish the existing detached garage and replace it with a new detached garage
subject to the plans presented.
Neither the homeowner, nor the designer were present at the meeting.
Member Blemaster stated that she sold Ms. Slomiany the home several years ago
and she can attest that the existing garage has deteriorated to the point that it needs
replacement. She added her opinion that the plans presented appear to compliment
the home and she would support the request.
Member Runyan agreed with Ms. Blemaster pointing out that the proposed plan for
the garage compliments the home and is compatible with the adjacent properties.
Following a brief discussion, Member Crawford moved approval of the request subject
to the plans presented. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
Ill. PRESERVATION MONTH — MAY ACTIVITIES
A. Annual Heritage Award
Planner Repya reminded the Board that Friday, April 15, 2005 was the deadline to submit
nominations for the Annual Heritage Award to be awarded in May. Thus far, no
2
Minutes — April 12, 2005 -
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
nominations have been received. She advised the Board that she will keep them
updated on the nominations after the 15th. No formal action was taken.
B. Baird House Tour
Planner Repya explained that Brad and Arlene Forrest had originally invited the Board to
tour their home last winter, however, due to scheduling conflicts, the tour was postponed.
Since then, it has been decided that with May being Preservation Month, it would be a
perfect time for the tour. That being the case, the Forrests are looking forward to
welcoming the Board to their home before the regular May meeting on May 10th at 6:00
p.m. Board members marked their calendars and expressed their delight in the
upcoming tour. No formal action was taken.
IV. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. j Historic Site Location Map - Discussion
For the benefit of the four new members to the Heritage Preservation Board, Consultant
Vogel reviewed the landmark designated properties in the City. He explained that the
map will assist the Board in keeping track of projects within the city. Mr. Vogel also
explained that when the city code was updated in 2002, it was designed to handle up to
50 designated properties, with a projected pace of adding 2 new designations per year
(there are currently 5 individually designated properties and one district designation).
Board members reviewed the map, asking for clarification on some of the designations.
No formal action was taken.
B. Preservation of Historic Catalpa Trees / Rare Boulevard Trees - Discussion
Consultant Vogel explained that interest has been expressed regarding protection
of the Catalpa trees lining W. 44th Street between Browndale Avenue and Wooddale
Avenue. He pointed out that these trees are historically significant because Jonathan
Grimes who. as a nurseryman and President of the Minnesota Horticultural Society
brought the Catalpa tree to Minnesota in the 1850's. Apparently, Mr. Grimes had
admired the Catalpa as a beautiful, tall, fast growing boulevard tree when visiting
Cincinnati. In addition to the trees planted along W. 44th Street, the Minneapolis Park
Board also planted 50,000 of the trees throughout the city. In keeping with his interest in
the Catalpa, Mr. Grimes wrote several articles touting its merits, which were published in
the MN Horticultural Society's bulletins.
Mr. Vogel explained that there is a place within Edina's preservation code to designate
living things if they are deemed historically significant. Because the Catalpa's are on the
3
Minutes April f2, 2005.
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
City right-of-way, the designation would not be unlike the Cahill School and Grange Hall,
which are City owned.
Board members asked if Mr. Vogel was looking for a motion favoring designation. He
explained that he wanted to go on record identifying the Catalpa as potential for
designation. However, before further action is taken, he would recommend that a
comprehensive survey of the City be undertaken to identify other trees that might qualify
for historic designation. Planner Repya suggested that Mr. Vogel meet with the City
Forester, Tom Horwath. She pointed out that Mr. Horwath has worked for the City for a
long time and is very well acquainted with the City's tree stock. Mr. Vogel agreed that
would be an excellent idea. No formal action was taken.
C. Highway 100/Minnehaha Creek Sound wall — Project Update
Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that the Minnesota Department of Transportation
was considering the Board's request to revise the sound -wall over Minnehaha Creek to
provide a more aesthetically pleasing structure from the creek side. He explained that he
has not seen a final plan, but feels confident that some measures will be taken to "soften"
the impact. Planner Repya offered to check with Engineer, Wayne Houle to see where
the potential revision plans stood. No formal action was taken.
D. 50th Anniversary of Southdale Mall — October 8, 1956
Consultant Vogel noted that the 50th anniversary of the Southdale Mall is coming up in
October of 2006. He indicated it would be a good idea for the Heritage Preservation
Board to work on some sort of commemoration, (perhaps in conjunction with the Edina
Historical Society) to recognize this important date in the City's history. Board members
agreed that would be an important item to include in future work plans. No formal action
was taken.
E. 1, Comprehensive Preservation Plan - Update
As a means of bringing the new members up to speed regarding the Comprehensive
Plan the Board has been working on, Mr. Vogel explained that thus far, the Board has
completed the Mission Statement and Vision for the plan. Due to the large turnover in
membership, the project was put on hold to allow the new members to gain some
knowledge and history about City's preservation activities. He pointed out that the Plan
will be a policy manual to guide decision making for the Board and City Council as well as
to maintain an institutional memory.
Board members were presented copies of the executive summary of the City's Vision
20/20 plan. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the preservation plan will serve the HPB, setting
out goals, objectives and policies for preservation, much like the Vision 20/20 plan serves
to guide decisions impacting the City's future.
2
Minutes — April 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Board members appreciated receiving copies of Vision 20/20, pointing out that the
preservation plan should dovetail with this document as well as the City's Comprehensive
Plan. No formal action was taken.
IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 10, 2005, 6:00 p.m. at the Baird House
4400 W. 50t" St.
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce Repya
5
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2005, AT 7:30 P.M.
4400 W. 50�' STREET
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
6:00 P.M. — 7.15 P.M. BAIRD HOUSE TOUR — 4400 WEST 50TH STREET
7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: April 12, 2005
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. H-05-2 4607 Moorland Avenue
Convert attached garage to living space and construct a
new detached garage.
B. H-05-3 4603 Moorland Avenue
Convert attached garage to living space and construct a
new detached garage.
C. H-05-4 4615 Casco Avenue
Convert attached garage to living space and construct a
new detached garage.
III. 2005 HERITAGE PRESERVATION AWARD — Presented May 3, 2005 to the
Morningside Neighborhood - REPORT
IV. 50 & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT — UPDATE
V. BROWNDALE BRIDGE/EDINA MILL SITE REPORT — Robert Vogel
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 14, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2005, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50' STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bob Kojetin, Bill Crawford, Peggy
Jennings, Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, David Runyan and
Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Marie Thorpe
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Jason Kourkoules, MA Peterson
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Jennings moved for approval of the minutes from the April 12, 2005 meeting.
Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS:
A. H-05-2 4607 Moorland Avenue
Construct a New Detached Garage
Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the
4600 block of Moorland Avenue. The home is a 1930 Norman style with English
Cottage influence. A 2 -car attached garage serves the home, accessed by a
driveway running along the south property line.
The subject request involves converting the existing attached garage to living space,
however reducing it in size by approximately a 1 '/z stall width to provide for the
additional 611 square feet of building coverage required for the new detached garage
proposed for the southeast corner of the rear yard.
A new curb cut is not required since the existing driveway will provide access to the
proposed garage.
The new detached garage is proposed to compliment the Norman/English Cottage
architectural style of the home; incorporating similar stone and trim, as well as a 10/12
pitch, slate covered, hip roof.
Minutes May 10, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Ms Repya pointed out that the height of the proposed garage is shown to be 20.62
feet at the highest peak and 9.5 feet to the eave line. The closest adjacent structure,
the garage to the south at 4609 Moorland Avenue is shown to be 8 feet from the
shared property line. The adjacent garage, measuring 13 feet 9 inches in height is a
single story, flat -roofed structure, attached to the home, and appears to have a deck
on the roof. The site plan demonstrates a proposed 4 -foot side and rear yard
setback, exceeding the 3 feet required for a detached structure in the rear yard.
The Edina Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 2 -car garage in the R-1 zoning
district. The proposed 23.5'x 26' detached garage provides room for 2 -stalls plus
storage. The addition to the home is proposed to be reduced to accommodate the
additional lot coverage of the new garage. No variances from the Zoning Ordinance
will be required for the proposed plan.
In closing, Ms. Repya observed that the proposed 23.5'x 26', detached garage
provides room for 2 stalls plus storage, and no variances from the Zoning Ordinance
will be required. The addition to the home is proposed to be reduced to
accommodate the additional lot coverage of the new garage. Furthermore, the
exterior materials of the new garage will compliment the existing home, and the new
structure meets the setback, height and lot coverage requirements set out in the
Zoning Ordinance. Thus, Staff recommends approval of the request to build a new
detached garage in the rear yard subject to the plans presented.
Jason Kourkoules of MA Peterson was present to represent the homeowners of all
three requests being heard.
Member Jennings asked if changes were proposed for the driveway. Mr. Kourkoules
explained that the driveway will most likely be resurfaced, however he did not foresee
that it would be widened.
Member Nyberg asked if the shed currently in the northeast comer of the yard would
be removed: Mr. Kourkoules replied that with the storage space provided in the new
garage, the shed would no longer be necessary.
Member Runyan pointed out that the guidelines for detached garages specifies that
undecorated side walls longer than 16 feet should be avoided whenever possible,
however, the plan illustrates blank walls in excess of 16 feet on the east and south
sides.
Board members discussed the lack of architectural detail on the side and rear
elevations. The type of architectural details that could be introduced was discussed,
to include windows, or the introduction of another building material. However, the
Board agreed that they did not want to redesign the garage.
2
Minutes — May 10, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
The new detached garage is proposed to be 484 square feet in area, measuring 22' x
22'. The design of the structure is shown to compliment the architectural style of the
home; incorporating wood -shake walls with trim boards, and an asphalt shingled,
gable end roof. The height of the garage is shown to be 16.5 feet at the highest peak,
12.5 feet at the mid point and 8 feet at the eave line. The ridge of the roof is
proposed to be 24 feet long and the pitch of the roof will be an 8/12.
Ms. Repya pointed out that the closest adjacent structure is the 2 -car, detached
garage in the rear yard of 4616 Bruce Avenue, southeast of the proposed garage.
The adjacent garage appears to maintain a minimum 3 -foot setback, and measures
roughly 13 feet in height at the peak with a 4/12 pitch on a hip roof.
The plans provided with the subject request illustrate the scale and scope of the
project relative to the principal home. The proposed structure will compliment the
American Colonial Revival architectural of the home. Furthermore, the plans meet the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and no variances will be required. Thus, Staff
would recommend approval of the request subject to the plans presented.
Chairman Nyberg opined that the plans provided illustrate a very plain structure with
absolutely no design detail with the exception of a service door on the north elevation.
Again a structure with long blank walls on two elevations is proposed.
Consultant Vogel stated that the American Colonial Revival style is simpler than
some of the others found in the district; and by its nature, a garage is a more utilitarian
structure, not necessarily requiring the amount of architectural detail one might find on
the home.
Member Blemaster stated that she agreed with Member Nyberg. She found the
plainness of the plan disappointing.
Member Jennings observed that other plans have illustrated details such as lighting
that are missing from this plan.
Mr. Kourkoules explained that by code exterior lighting is required at the service door
as well as at the overhead door, although it isn't shown on the plan, it is required.
Discussion ensued regarding the lack of architectural detail on the proposed plan.
Consultant Vogel suggested that the Board focus on the visual compatibility of the
proposed structure relative to the home and adjacent properties.
Mr. Kourkoules pointed out that while the plan does not illustrate a structure as
detailed as the house, it is a compatible structure.
Member Runyan opined that while the plan may be simpler than others reviewed; with
the use of shake siding and a similar roof as the house, the garage will look as though
it belongs.
5
Minutes May 10, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Member Blemaster stated that she feels it is important for the Board to protect
surrounding properties when reviewing plans for new construction. She added that it
would be important to be consistent with the two previous decisions and require that
architectural detailing should be added to the blank east and south walls.
Member Jennings agreed pointing out that due to its location, it will be visible from the
street.
Member Crawford then moved approval of the request for a Certificate of
Appropriateness to construct a new detached garage subject to the plans presented
and the condition that architectural detailing be added to the east and south walls of
the structure. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
2005 EDINA HERITAGE AWARD — Morningside Neighborhood:
Planner Repya reported that the Mayor and City Council presented the Morningside
Neighborhood the 2005 Edina Heritage Award at their May 3rd meeting. Five
members of the Morningside Neighborhood Association were thrilled to receive the
plaque and enjoyed a photo session with the Mayor,
Member Kojetin stated that after the presentation he was talking with some of the
neighborhood representatives who expressed a desire to display the plaque inside the
Weber Park warming house. They also indicated that they would like a protected
bulletin board on the outside of the building to post neighborhood news.
Board members agreed that both requests seemed reasonable. Member Kojetin
suggested that Planner Repya pass the request on to John Keprios, the Park Director
who can than work with the neighborhood group. No formal action was taken.
IV, BROWNDALE BRIDGE REPORT:
Consultant Vogel explained that he has completed the historical assessment of the
Browndale Bridge over Minnehaha Creek. The purpose of the investigation was to
document the historical and architectural values of the bridge in order to determine
whether it meets the eligibility criteria for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark;
to integrate historic preservation with planning for future public works construction
related to transportation improvements in the vicinity of the bridge; and to recommend
specific ways to maintain and enhance the historic, cultural, aesthetic and visual
character of the Browndale Bridge crossing, which is included in the Edina Country
Club Historic District.
In a previous report dated November 3, 2004, Mr. Vogel described the basic
considerations involved. He also provided preliminary results of his research. Since
N.
Minutes — May 10, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
then, some new information was found which allows a more definitive identification of
the historic bridge.
Drawings and bridge inspection records located in the archives of the Hennepin
County Engineer indicate that the present structure was erected in 1906 [MnDOT
records give the date as "1902'1 as a county bridge project. It replaced the original
(circa 1860) "stone arch bridge" at the Edina Mill, which had been damaged by
flooding. The existing bridge may incorporate parts of the earlier structure (as well as
part of the mill dam) and has been only slightly altered from its original appearance.
Notwithstanding these minor alterations, the bridge is eligible for landmark designation
on the basis of its association with transportation; it served as the focus of the Edina
Mills community's transportation system, reflects the importance of the Minnehaha
Creek crossing during the early period of suburban development, and represents a
rare preserved example of early -20th century public infrastructure. The bridge itself
embodies distinctive design characteristics associated with modern masonry arch
bridge construction and illustrates important concepts in turn -of -the -century bridge
engineering. The local historic context for evaluating the significance of the bridge
include: 'The Suburban Landscape (1887 to 1974") within the theme "Edina Mills:
Agriculture and Rural Life"(1857 to 1912) [as identified in Edina Historic Context
Study, 1999]. Although the Browndale Bridge does not meet modem highway
standards, it retains sufficient integrity of design, materials and stetting to meet the
standard for historic integrity.
Consultant Vogel pointed out that the recommended treatment for the Browndale
Bridge is preservation in place with stabilization of the historic masonry and ongoing
maintenance to sustain the existing form of the structure. The city should make every
effort to retain the historic bridge as a functional part of the modern city transportation
system while preserving its distinguishing original qualities and character. If it can no
longer be used for vehicle traffic, the bridge should be adapted for use as a
pedestrian bridge. The distinctive form of the bridge needs to be treated with
sensitivity and repairs to the masonry should match the original material in
composition, color and texture.
If the Browndale Bridge cannot be preserved in place for reasons of public safety, the
recommended treatment to mitigate the effects of demolition is recordation:
documenting the bridge with measured drawings, large -format negative photographs,
and written information to the standards of the Historic American Engineering Record
(HAER).
Mr. Vogel concluded that he has begun preparing the documents necessary for
nominating the Browndale Bridge for designation as a heritage landmark. He
foresees moving ahead with the designation this fall.
Member Blemaster questioned the safety of the bridge; pointing out that just last week
a vehicle crossing the bridge hit her car. Mr. Vogel stated that there have been
7
Minutes = May 10 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
accidents on the bridge and perhaps additional signage is warranted, however, it is
not likely that it would be closed or turned into a one-way traffic flow.
A brief discussion followed. No formal action was taken.
V. 50TH & FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT UPDATE:
Planner Repya shared the approved plans for the new mixed use building to be
constructed on the southwest corner of 50th & France. Board members were
interested to see the plan that was finally approved.
Consultant Vogel suggested that the City obtain a Mylar copy of the plans to archive
for future use. One day, this will be an historic structure and a Mylar copy would be
important.
VI. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT OPEN HOUSE ANNOUNCEMENT:
Planner Repya announced that the City's Engineering and Public Works Department
will hold an open house at Edina City Hall on Wednesday, May 25 th from 5:30 p.m. to
7:45 p.m. to present a proposed utility reconstruction project for the Country Club
District. The improvements included in the project are:
Mainline sanitary sewer and water main pipes
City owned portion of individual sanitary sewer services and water services
• Storm sewer pipes
• Streets
Sidewalks
Street lighting
Boulevard areas
Pedestrian safety improvements
Board members are encouraged to attend the open house to become familiar with the project.
She added that an invitation would be mailed to the Board. No formal action was taken.
VII. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 14, 2005
VIII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:40 p.m.
Res ectfully submitted,
ceepya
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
4801 W. 50'h STREET
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 10, 2005
II. GRANGE HALL — H-05-5 Certificate of Appropriateness to Reside Building
III. EDINA THEATER HERITAGE LANDMARK — Determine Preservation
Potential of Marquee.
IV. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN — Review Concepts & Format
V. GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT:
H-05-6 COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT - Reconstruction of District
Sewer, Water and Streets
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: July 12, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JUNE 14, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50'" STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Bob Kojetin, Bill Crawford, Lou Blemaster,
Marie Thorpe, and David Runyan
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg, Peggy Jennings, Karen Ferrara and Ian Yue
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
Wayne Houle, City Engineer/Director of Public Works
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Paul Pasko, Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH)
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Thorpe moved for approval of the minutes from the May 10, 2005 meeting.
Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. GRANGE HALL:
H-05-5 Certificate of Appropriateness to Reside Building
Planner Repya reminded the Board that because the Heritage Landmark designated
Grange Hall is owned by the City, even maintenance projects must receive a
Certificate of Appropriateness. Furthermore, adherence to the Secretary of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties is the required basis for
all decisions.
This summer, Park Superintendent Vince Cockriel, who oversees the City owned park
properties has provided for the residing of the Grange Hall in his 2005 budget.
Consultant Vogel advised that for re -siding a historic building, the standard should
avoid the removal or alteration of any historic material; deteriorated siding should be
repaired rather than replaced. However, if replacement is necessary, the new
material should match the material being replaced in size, shape and texture. Vinyl is
an inappropriate new material for historic buildings. The wood lap siding is an
essential part of the Grange Hall's historic character.
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Superintendent Cockriel explained that he has researched historic grange halls and
created the request for proposal from original 1899 specifications he had found for a
similar building. He added that he is proposing to replace the siding rather than
repairing it because of the large amount of deterioration that exists and also because
in doing so, the building, which currently has no insulation, can then be wrapped with
a Tyvek type of material which will strengthen its integrity. The ornamental trim will be
reused as much as possible.
Mr. Cockreil required three bids for the job and found them all to be very detailed.
The company he is recommending, Westurn Roofing was actually the low bid at
$21,985, however, they provided the best package, offering 4" lap (raw cedar) siding.
They also included many examples of quality siding jobs they have completed and
exhibited a respect for the unique needs of a historic building. During the bidding
process alone, the Westurn representative met on the site several times to clarify
questions he had.
Consultant Vogel stated that he had reviewed the proposed bids and agreed that
replacement rather than repair would be appropriate at this time.
Member Kojetin opined that it is very important to restore the building as close as
possible to the original specifications. He then asked Mr. Cockriel if he was aware of
the previous problems with bee's nests in the walls. Mr. Cockriel stated that he had
alerted Westurn Roofing of the bee problem and they are prepared to address that
situation if it arises.
Superintendent Cockriel further explained that because the Cahill School was painted
in 2003, it is not scheduled for residing at this time. However, he plans on reviewing
the work done on the Grange Hall and will determine whether or not to entertain a bid
from Westurn Roofing to reside the Cahill School at a later date.
Following a brief discussion, Member Crawford moved to approve the Certificate of
Appropriateness to reside the Grange Hall subject to the plans presented. Member
Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
III. EDINA THEATER HERITAGE LANDMARK:
Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that in March the issue was raised as to
whether or not the marquee should be included in the Edina Heritage Landmark
designation of the Edina Theater sign.
Previously, the HPB had issued a finding of significance for the theater sign based on
its outstanding value as an example of public art and its importance to the cultural life
of the 50th and France neighborhood. It was determined that the vertical, lighted sign
epitomized the design principles of the Art Deco style and was a significant
neighborhood landmark in its own right. Furthermore, the Board was of the opinion
2
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
that the theater building was not historically significant and that the sign derived more
of its cultural significance form its artistic value than from its association with the
theater.
The Edina Theater building itself is not being nominated for landmark designation.
The original draft plan of treatment approved by the Board in November 2004
recognized that while the theater building was "not the primary heritage preservation
resource" its "historical value and preservation potential also needs to be recognized
and respected." The draft plan of treatment addressed the requirement for an HPB
approved redevelopment plan that would preserve and protect the historic sign in the
case of demolition of the theater building. The Board assumed, worst case, that the
sign would be removed during demolition of the theater and replaced in an
appropriate setting where it would continue to function as an art object.
Mr. Vogel observed that for planning purposes, the theater sign is considered to be a
historic object. The term "object" is used to distinguish from buildings and structures,
those works that are primarily artistic in nature and relatively small in scale. It is
generally assumed that while historic objects may be movable, their significance is
derived from their association with a specific setting or environment. With respect to
the Edina Theater sign, because preservation in place may not be practical when the
property is redeveloped, the Board approved a preservation concept that would allow
the owner to adapt the sign to another building at 50th and France; in other words, the
owner would need to provide a compatible use that would require minimal alteration of
the sign and display it outdoors as a work of public art.
By definition, the theater marquee is a structural element of the theater building that is
functionally separate from the theater sign. (The sign was the theater's trademark —
the marquee was intended to inform patrons of the shows being presented.) While it
would be technically feasible to preserve the sign and marquee together as part of the
theater building, Mr. Vogel pointed out that he did not believe the marquee is an
important art history resource. He opined that the marquee is a functional
construction without high artistic value — it could not stand alone as a heritage
landmark and its physical connection and historical association with the sign cannot
be considered significant. Put another way, while the lighted sign can stand alone as
a significant art history object, the marquee would not enhance the significance of the
sign if the theater building were to be removed.
In closing, Mr. Vogel recommended to proceed with the landmark nomination of the
sign only, while encouraging the owner to preserve the existing theater fagade (sign,
marquee, lobby, and storefronts).
Board members discussed the importance of the marquee relative to the "Edina" sign
and agreed that while they liked the marquee, they understood the problems
associated with preservation of the two very different sign elements if the building
ceased operating as a theater.
3
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Mr. Vogel pointed out that from discussions with the owner Mr. Haugland, it appeared
that he is concerned about the ability to address the marquee and sign together in the
event a the sign needed to be moved within 50th and France. If the Board tried to
force the marquee preservation to be included in the designation, Mr. Haugland might
say, "Forget it, I don't want to designate anything."
Member Thorpe stated that she recognized it would be ideal to designate both the
Edina theater sign and marquee, however from a practical standpoint; it appears that
the "Edina" sign is the art object that stands out as a community icon, while the
marquee functions for the purpose of the theater operation. She then moved to
proceed with the landmark nomination of the Edina Theater sign only, however
encourage the owner to preserve the existing theater facade, to include the sign,
marquee, lobby and storefronts. Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted
aye. The motion carried.
IV. GUIDELINES FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS IN THE
COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT:
H-05-6 COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT — Reconstruction of District Sewer,
Water and Streets:
Planner Repya reminded the Board that the Country Club District Plan of Treatment
stipulates that "The City will develop and implement a plan for the preservation,
maintenance and replacement of all public infrastructures within the district, including
streets, bridges, trees, sidewalks, street lighting, signs and open space areas that give
the neighborhood its distinguishing character."
Consultant Vogel has created proposed guidelines for the Board to consider (attached
to these minutes). Once the Board has approved the guidelines, they will become part
of the district's Plan of Treatment; like the guidelines for new home construction and
detached garages, the public infrastructure guidelines will assist the Board in making
decisions. In fact, the subject proposal (H-05-6) is a prime example of what the
guidelines oversee.
The intent of the guidelines is to recommend some generalized "best practices" for
maintenance and construction, emphasizing historic landscape rehabilitation, and not
to prescribe any particular set of design standards or management strategies. The
guidelines offer recommendations for the streets (to include sidewalks, street lighting
and traffic islands), urban forestry (boulevard trees) and utilities.
Vice Chairman Kojetin suggested that the City Engineer and consultant present the
proposed public works project allowing the Board to see how the guidelines would be
applied to a project, and then address adoption of the guidelines.
4
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
. Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Pubic Works and Paul Pasko,
Consultant with Short Elliott and Hendrickson shared the same power point
presentation that was provided to the Country Club neighborhood at the May 25t"
Open House. The proposed schedule for the project was laid out with the first public
hearing taking place with the City Council in July 2005. A detailed explanation of the
project was presented including the following improvements:
• Mainline sanitary sewer and water main pipe replacement
• Replacement of city owned portion of individual sanitary sewer and
water services
• Storm sewer pipe replacement
• Street replacement (except Bridge Street)
• Street light replacement
• Pedestrian safety improvements (crosswalks)
Engineer Houle stressed that the techniques proposed to complete each of the tasks
were carefully considered; incorporating trenchless methods, whenever possible,
while being slightly more expensive, will provide the least amount of disruption to the
street and boulevard areas, with the intention of not losing one boulevard tree.
Mr. Houle explained that the project is proposed to be phased over two years with the
portion of the neighborhood north of Bridge Street slated for 2006 and that portion
south of Bridge Street set for 2007. The expected assessment to each property for
the project will be approximately $12,000 spread over a 10 year time period.
Board members discussed the proposed project and agreed that the plans exhibited
sensitivity to the historic fabric of the neighborhood.
Member Thorpe asked if the following considerations could be made to the street and
pedestrian crosswalk portion of the plan:
• Examine soft ways to design the street system to make speeding
more difficult.
• Redesign intersections to create more of a right angle rather than the
gradual curves that currently exist.
• Add bike paths on some streets in the district.
• Add a median down the center of the busier streets.
• Construct raised crosswalks.
Engineer Houle explained that adding bike paths or medians down the center of the
streets would not be possible due to the limited street widths. Also, creating raised
crosswalks can be problematic for not only the snow plow drivers, but also to the
emergency response vehicles. He did indicate that perhaps soft reconfigurations of
intersections, particularly at the larger islands may be possible.
5
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Member Kojetin cautioned that any changes made must retain the distinctive features
of the original plat.
Mrs. Thorpe opined that at times public safety must take precedence over historic
preservation. Furthermore, since the streets will be replaced, now is the time to
address traffic calming issues.
The Board agreed that public safety is important, however there is a Traffic Safety
Committee to make those suggestions; that is not the job of the Heritage Preservation
Board.
Discussion ensued regarding the safety of the crosswalks and applications that could
serve to promote a safer environment while preserving the historic fabric of the
district. Engineer Houle indicated that possibly brick pavers could be installed at the
major pedestrian crosswalks. The brick pavers do a good job of delineating the
crosswalk area, are cost effective from a maintenance standpoint and also add a
certain level of charm.
Member Kojetin questioned the timing of the HPB review in light of the fact that the
City Council has not held the public hearing. Consultant Vogel stated that the HPB is
advisory to the Council, and providing a Certificate of Appropriateness to a conceptual
plan is appropriate.
Following a brief discussion, Planner Repya advised the Board that prior to making a
motion regarding the Certificate of Appropriateness for the subject project, they
needed to address the guidelines for the public infrastructure.
Member Thorpe stated that she liked the guidelines, however would like to see
something added to the "Street" section addressing public safety.
Consultant Vogel explained that the purpose of the guidelines is to assist decision
makers regarding public works projects affecting the overall historic character of the
district. The guidelines are not designed to prescribe any particular set of design
standards or management strategies. Items such as those affecting public safety
should not be identified in the guidelines, however handled on a case by case basis
through the Certificate of Appropriateness process.
Member Thorpe appreciated Mr. Vogel's explanation and then moved to adopt the
"Guidelines for Public Works Projects in the Country Club District" as presented.
Member Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Addressing the Certificate of Appropriateness for reconstruction of the district's sewer,
water and street systems, Member Crawford moved for approval with the following
two conditions:
1. Changes shall be considered to the street at major intersections with
islands to ensure vehicles come to a complete stop, and
C
Minutes — June 14, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
2. Brick pavers shall be used for pedestrian crosswalks at major
intersections.
Member Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN:
Due to the fact that three new Board members were absent, it was agreed that
this item should be continued until the July meeting.
VI. NEXT MEETING DATE: July 12, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 9:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted
�1
Sb�yyce Repya
•
7
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
4801 W. 50"' STREET
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: JUNE 14, 2005
II. EDINA THEATER SIGN - HERITAGE LANDMARK NOMINATION
III. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN — Review Concepts & Format
IV. INTERLACHEN RECREATIONAL TRAIL SURVEY
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 9, 2005
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JULY 12, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50'" STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Marie Thorpe, Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, Arlene
Forrest, David Runyan, Bob Kojetin and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Gene Haugland, Edina Theater Building Owner
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Ferrara moved for approval of the minutes from the June 14, 2005 meeting.
Member Yue seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. EDINA THEATER SIGN — LANDMARK DESIGNATION:
Planner Repya reminded the Board that at their last meeting they had agreed that the
Edina Theater sign without the marquee was worthy of heritage landmark designation.
Consultant Vogel provided the Board with the required nomination study and
proposed plan of treatment. The nomination study explains the history of the art deco
theater sign as well as its landmark significance as an art object.
The proposed plan of treatment uses the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide. The plan consists of the
following six guidelines specifically tailored to the preservation requirements of the
Edina Theater sign:
#1 The Edina Theater sign will be recognized as a work of public art that is important
to the cultural life of the city as a whole.
#2 While the historical significance of the sign is related to its specific location at the
site of the Edina Theater, the existing theater building is not a primary heritage
preservation resource. However, in its present condition the theater building makes a
Minutes -- July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
positive contribution to the historic character of the sign; therefore, its historical value
and preservation potential also needs to be recognized and respected.
#3 The owner will be expected to apply measures to sustain the existing form,
integrity, and material of the theater sign, including repair and stabilization work where
necessary as well as ongoing maintenance. Repair and replacement of deteriorated
features should be based on accurate duplications of the original, based on historical,
pictorial, or physical evidence.
#4 The distinguishing original qualities and character of the sign should not be
destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic fabric or decorative detailing
should be avoided whenever possible.
#5 Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve the theater sign in place
without altering its height, setback, or viewshed.
#6 Demolition of all or part of the existing theater building will require a Certificate of
Appropriateness. The city will not issue any permit for demolition until the Heritage
Preservation Board approves a redevelopment plan that preserves and protects the
historic sign in a manner consistent with its landmark status. If the sign must give way
to new development, it may be relocated to a new site with compatible surroundings
where it can be preserved and rehabilitated.
The guidelines were crafted after a meeting with the building owner, Gene Haugland,
however, Mr. Haugland may at this time choose to fine tune the plan.
Mr. Haugland was present to address the proposed landmark designation of the
theater sign. He explained that when he purchased the theater 60% of the sign bulbs
were non functional. The sign was rusted and in need of extensive repairs, not to
mention a new coat of paint. Several years ago, an extensive renovation project was
undertaken. The sign has sported several different color combinations since 1934;
however the current colors were researched and found to be consistent with the
original theater sign. Not only were the bulbs repaired and replaced, but the original
sequencer was repaired to provide the cascading of lights in the starburst and down
the side of the sign.
Mr. Haugland pointed out that he and his wife were honored to receive the 2003
Heritage Award for their work in restoring the sign; and agreed that the landmark
designation of the sign is a natural next step. Mr. Haugland did share that over the
years he has had some unpleasant experiences in other communities when dealing
with heritage preservation regulations imposed upon his projects. He added that he
appreciated Edina's approach whereby the property owner is a team player.
Mr. Haugland offered several corrections to the history section of the nomination
study. Addressing the plan of treatment, he indicated that of the six guidelines, he
would like three of them to be reworded:
F
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
#4 "The distinguishing original qualities and character of the sign should not be
destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic fabric or decorative detailing
should be avoided whenever possible.
Mr. Haugland asked that the work "original" be replaced with "existing" in light of the
fact that the sign is not the original sign, but was rebuilt after the tornado in the
1980's. Board members agreed with the correction.
#5 "Every reasonable effort shall be made to preserve the theater sign in place
without altering its height, setback or view shed.
Mr. Haugland pointed out that he would like the work "Every" removed. Board
members agreed. He added that he found the protection of the "view shed" to be
interesting since it is already compromised from several vantage points, however he
did not ask for removal of that word.
#6 "Demolition of all or part of the existing theater building will require a
Certificate of Appropriateness. The city will not issue any permit for demolition until
the Heritage Preservation Board approves a redevelopment plan that preserves and
protects the historic sign in a manner consistent with its landmark status. If the sign
must give way to new development, it may be relocated to a new site with
compatible surroundings where it can be preserved and rehabilitated."
Mr. Haugland stated that this point causes him the greatest concern. While only the
theater sign is being designated a landmark, this point requires that the Heritage
Preservation Board approve the plans for a new building in the event that a
redevelopment project is proposed.
Consultant Vogel explained that the intent of this point is to ensure that if the building
is to be razed, that plans are identified to protect the sign. Mr. Haugland opined that
the last sentence does a good job of protecting the sign without holding the owner
hostage to the Board for approval of a new development. Board members agreed
with Mr. Haugland that the last sentence met the intention of protecting the sign.
Responding to a question regarding the timeline for the landmark designation
process, Consultant Vogel explained that once the HPB moves to recommend the
landmark designation of theater sign, the nomination study and plan of treatment will
be submitted to the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office for their comment;
they have a 60 daytime period to respond. After the State has responded, the
designation report will go to the Planning Commission for their comments and lastly to
the City Council for the final review and action. If the proposed designation is sent to
the State by the end of July (they usually take the full 60 day period to respond), the
Planning Commission would hear the request in October. City Council action would
then follow in November.
3
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Following a brief discussion, Member Blemaster moved approval of the Edina Theater
Sign heritage landmark nomination study and plan of treatment as amended.
Member Kojetin seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
III. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN: Concepts and Format
Consultant Vogel explained that in September 2004, the HPB started working on a
comprehensive historic preservation plan to help city decision makers (HPB, City
Council, Planning Commission and administrative staff) plan for the wise use of the
City's significant heritage resources. Thus far, the framework for the plan has been
created, the "Mission" was agreed upon, and work had begun on the "Vision" section.
Work on the plan was put on hold due to the large turnover in Board membership.
With five new members now on board, this is a perfect time to bring everyone up to
speed with what has been accomplished thus far, and continue working on the plan.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that with the use of a comprehensive heritage plan, structure is
provided that allows a board to get out of the reactionary mode by establishing goals and
objectives.
As an introduction to the newest members, Mr. Vogel offered the following 5 Basic
Concepts of Historic Preservation:
1. Historic buildings and sites are scarce and non-renewable cultural resources and
should be treated as critical assets for community development.
2. Historic Preservation is an important public service and a legitimate responsibility of
city government.
3. Not everything that is old is worth preserving: protective measures should focus on
significant historic resources.
4. Saving significant historic resources for the benefit of future generations is always in
the public interest.
5. Effective historic preservation policies are those which create a partnership between
owners of historic properties and city government.
Mr. Vogel elaborated on each concept, pointing out that by creating a comprehensive
preservation plan, the historic preservation work of the city can be structured in a way
that the identified goals and objectives are met in a time and cost efficient manner.
Member Blemaster thanked Mr. Vogel for clearly explaining the concepts, pointing out
that the exercise has helped her understand the direction the Board is headed with the
proposed plan. A brief discussion followed. No formal action was taken.
4
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
IV. INTERLACHEN RECREATIONAL TRAIL SURVEY:
Consultant Vogel explained that the City of Edina Engineering Department is
proposing an eight foot wide recreational trail on the north side of Interlachen
Boulevard from the corner of Interlachen and Vernon Avenue, running west to Blake
Road where it will continue northward on the east side of Blake Road into Hopkins.
Because federal funds will be involved with this project, the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (Mn/DOT) has determined that the City must survey 3 properties
abutting the proposed trail which they have determined might be eligible for National
Register of Historic Places and could possibly be affected by the trail.
The City may either hire their own consultant or have Mn/DOT undertake the work.
The City Engineer, Wayne Houle will be in charge of this project and the survey funds
will come out of his budget.
Engineer Houle met with the consultants for the project, SRF Consulting Group, Mr.
Vogel and Planner Repya to discuss the project relative to the heritage preservation
ramifications. Mr. Vogel indicated that his firm would be interested in doing the survey
work.
The project would not require approval from the HPB, however the information
collected particularly regarding the Interlachen Country Club would be beneficial to
meeting the goals identified in Section IX. (Country Club and Parks: The Heritage of
Recreation, Leisure and Sport) of the Historic Context Study. While the Country Clubs
are not high on the priority list for research, it only makes sense for the City to take
advantage of an opportunity to ensure that the historic information required for the
project can also meet our Historic Context goals.
Mr. Vogel added that depending how the study goes, he may ask for volunteers from
the HPB to assist in the "on the ground" research. He further explained that the
construction of the trail is tentatively proposed for 2007. He would hope to commence
the necessary field work research this September through October.
Board members agreed that it was an interesting project. Mr. Vogel stated that he
would keep them advised of the progress. No formal action was taken.
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 9, 2005
VII. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
4801 W. 50t1i STREET
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
I
II.
V.
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: JULY 12, 2005
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS — COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
A. H-05-7 4523 Arden Avenue — Move Detached Garage
B. H-05-8 4601 Drexel Avenue — Demolish Home & Build a New Home
26" ANNUAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE: September 14-16,2005
Duluth Entertainment Convention Center, Duluth, Minnesota
OTHER BUSINESS:
NEXT MEETING DATE: September 13, 2005 (8:00 p.m. due to Primary)
VI. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, AUGUST 9, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Karen Ferrara, Arlene
Forrest, David Runyan, Lou Blemaster, and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
Margaret Busyn — 4523 Arden Avenue
Jeff Schoenwetter, Nancy Schoenwetter, Andy Porter
And Eric Nelson — JMS Custom Homes, LLC
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Ferrara moved for approval of the minutes from the July 12, 2005 meeting.
Member Thorpe seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT
A. 4523 Arden Avenue — Move Detached Garage
Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the east side of the
4500 block of Arden Avenue. The existing home is a 1924 English Cottage. A 2 -car
detached garage is located in the northeast corner of the lot, accessed by a driveway
running along the south property line.
The subject request involves moving the existing detached garage from the northeast
corner of the lot to the southeast corner. The garage currently sits 4.8 feet from the
north lot line and seven feet from the rear lot line with a south facing door. The plan
indicates that the new placement of the garage will be four feet from the rear and
side lot lines. Furthermore, the garage will be accessed by a west facing door at the
culmination of the existing driveway.
The proponent has indicated that upon moving the garage they plan to update the
roof with Timberline asphalt shingles, and replace the siding with cedar shakes to
compliment the improvements being made to the home. They are also proposing to
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
install a new door. The rationale for moving the garage is to improve the livability of
the rear yard.
The property to the south, 4525 Arden Avenue has an attached garage that is
accessed by a shared driveway with the subject property. There is no detached
structure adjacent to the proposed location of the subject garage.
Planner Repya pointed out that the home at the subject property is currently
undergoing extensive renovation, both inside and out. The property owner has
indicated that by moving the garage to the southeast corner of the lot the usable area
of the backyard will be increased by approximately 30 feet.
The property owner has indicated that the exterior materials of the moved garage will
compliment the existing home; and the survey provided indicates that placement
meets the setback requirements set out in the Zoning Ordinance. Thus, staff
recommends approval of the request to move the detached garage from the northeast
corner to the southeast corner of the property subject to the plans presented.
A brief discussion ensued among the Board. All agreed that the proposed plan is
consistent with the Plan of Treatment for the Country Club District.
Property owner, Margaret Busyn explained that the current location of the garage,
seven feet from the rear lot line takes away from usable area in the back yard and
provides nothing more than a strip of land which would most likely become a catch-all
for ladders and other miscellaneous items.
Member Forrest agreed with Ms. Busyn and pointed out that she particularly liked the
fact that the proposed plan significantly reduces the amount of impervious surface on
the lot.
Member Thorpe moved for approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to move the
detached garage from the northeast corner of the lot to the southeast corner, subject
to the plans presented. Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
B. H-05-08 4601 Drexel Avenue — Demolish Home & Build a New Home
Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the southeast corner
of Drexel Avenue and Bridge Street. The existing home, constructed in 1925 is an
English Cottage style with Norman Influence with a single car detached garage. The
home is classified as pivotal in the 1980 survey of homes in the Country Club District.
In June of 1925, this home served as a model home in the "Third Annual Home
Complete Exhibition". The home was on display for one week and marketed to be
completely equipped, landscaped, with a 1925 Buick coach standing at the front door
and a Country Club golf membership all for the price of $14,500.
E
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
The subject request is to demolish the home and construct a new home on the site.
Originally, when the applicant purchased the home, their intent was to undertake a
significant renovation project, however after professional inspections of the structure,
they determined that "it was unreasonable to make an efficient contemporary use of
the home while preserving the historically and architecturally significant features".
The applicant has indicated that due to negligence of maintenance over the years the
structure has deteriorated to the point that the livability of the home has been
drastically affected. The applicant has also indicated that due to the extensive
amount of wall mold infestation, the home is beyond the point of reasonably accepted
remediation.
Planner Repya pointed out that the plans for a new home on the site illustrate a 2 -
story English Tudor style home with an attached 3 car garage. The exterior finishes
for siding are natural stone and stucco and false % timbering appearance created
from hardiboard composite siding products. The roof is shown to have a 14/12 pitch
with roofing material to be a composition shingle in a traditional shape, or faux slate if
cost allows.
The height at the roof ridge is illustrated at 30' 3", having been reduced by nearly 4
feet from the initial submittal to help the design better conform to the adjacent home
heights. The home directly to the south, 4603 Drexel Avenue is an American Colonial
Revival with a 22' height to the roof ridge. This home has a considerably lower
stature when compared to the surrounding homes. The proponent has provided
photographs of surrounding homes; however the heights were not included. The
proponent has indicated that if the Board would like the surrounding building heights,
they will provide it.
Consultant, Robert Vogel has reviewed the proposed plan and came to the conclusion
that regarding the historical significance of the existing home, he believes the intent
of the City Council was to create a landmark district that derived its historic
preservation value from the interrelationship of the homes and the original
development plan — and not from individual houses. The landmark study approved on
January 8, 2003 makes it clear that while 36% of the homes in the district had been
evaluated as having "pivotal" importance when the neighborhood was placed on the
National Register in 1980, the HPB needed to re-evaluate individual homes on a
case-by-case basis to determine their eligibility for designation as Edina Heritage
Landmarks. Consequently, the subject home should be treated as one component
within the overall historic environment, but not as a property that is individually eligible
for landmark status.
Mr. Vogel observed that the plans illustrate that the proposed new construction is
consistent with the design guidelines adopted as part of the Country Club District Plan
of Treatment. The proposed structure appears to be visually compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood, -thus approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request
is recommended.
M
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Planner Repya stated that Staff concurs with Mr. Vogel, but would also add that if the
Board agrees to approve the subject Certificate of Appropriateness request to
demolish the existing home and build a new home, that the approval should be
subject to the plans presented, and subject to approval of the plan by the Building,
Planning and Engineering Departments.
Member Kojetin asked if approval of a request to demolish a home in the district might
open the floodgates for more requests. Consultant Vogel pointed out that the City
Council foresaw that there would be requests to demolish homes in the district and
that is why they established the Plan of Treatment; to ensure that the new
construction was consistent with the historic integrity of the neighborhood.
Mr. Vogel explained that the Plan of Treatment is not attempting to homogenize the
district. In fact, the original design review committee in the 1920's allowed for
diversity as one can see in the subject home, the home to the south and some of the
surrounding properties.
Mr. Vogel added that the design of the subject home is consistent with new
construction being seen in the district. Furthermore, the design work on the proposed
project is very good.
Member Kojetin asked how much larger the proposed home would be compared to
the existing home.
Jeff Schoenwetter of JMS Homes stated that no variances will be required for the
subject project and the side street setback on Bridge Street and the interior side yard
setback will be the same as the existing home. He added that the proposed home will
be roughly 15% to 18% larger than the existing home.
Member Kojetin explained that he was not interested in percentages, rather he
wanted to know how much wider or longer the new structure will be.
Andy Porter with JMS Homes stated that the new home with the attached garage will
be roughly six feet longer than the existing home and detached garage. He added
that the curb appeal along Bridge Street will mirror the three other corner homes on
Drexel and Bridge.
Member Thorpe appreciated the fact that the proponent lowered the height of the
home and indicated that she liked the plan.
Mr. Porter stated that JMS worked very hard on this plan to ensure that a quality
home was proposed. They found the Plan of Treatment to be a helpful tool in creating
the design and valued the assistance offered from the City Staff.
4
Minutes — July 12, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
When asked if the surrounding neighbors were aware of the plan, Mr. Porter said that
they plan on sharing the plans once they receive approval from the Heritage
Preservation Board. They felt to share the plans before the meeting would be
premature.
Member Forrest stated that she liked the details of the plan and found it very
attractive. While the side loading garage is consistent with what is seen in the District,
she pointed out that such a design creates more impervious surface which can
become problematic for water run-off.
Following a brief discussion, Member Thorpe stated that she felt the plan was fitting
for the neighborhood and moved approval of the Certificate of Approval to demolish
the existing home at 4601 Drexel Avenue and construct a new home on the site
subject to the plans presented and plan approval from the Building, Planning and
Engineering Departments. Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
III. 26TH ANNUAL STATEWIDE HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE
Planner Repya explained that the annual Minnesota Historic Preservation Conference
will be held in Duluth on September 14 —16, 2005. Because Edina is a Certified
Local Government, we are required to send at least one board member to at least one
day of the conference. Historically, the City has paid for the registration of those
members wishing to attend.
Board members reviewed the brochure that highlighted the itinerary for the
conference. All agreed that it looked worthwhile. Member Kojetin stated that he
would attend on Friday, September 16th and would be happy to drive any other
members wishing to attend.
Planner Repy�a asked Board members to look at their calendars and let her know by
September 7th if they would be interested in attending. No formal action was taken.
IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: September 13, 2005
V. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
P
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — ARNESON ACRES
4711 WEST 70TH STREET
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: AUGUST 9, 2005
II. EDINA THEATER SIGN LANDMARK NOMINATION - Update:
III. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN - Update:
IV. INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD TRAIL SURVEY — Preliminary Results:
V. BROWNDALE BRIDGE REHABILITATION — Update
VI. MINNESOTA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE — Report from Bob Kojetin
VII. PRESERVATION FORUM 2006 IN BALTIMORE (July 27-30m 2006)
VIII. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION - Meeting in St. Paul
(October 1-7, 2007)
IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: November 8, 2005 (discussion due to Election Day)
X. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY AT ARNESON ACRES
4711 WEST 70TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chair Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Arlene Forrest, David
Runyan, Lou Blemaster, Chris Rofidal, and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg and Karen Ferrara
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Thorpe moved for approval of the minutes from the August 9, 2005 meeting.
Member Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. EDINA THEATER SIGN — LANDMARK NOMINATION:
Consultant Vogel explained that the State Historical Society must have 60 days to
review the landmark nomination for the Edina Theater Sign. At this time, the 60 day
period is over; although we have not heard from SHPO, we can now proceed to the
next step of the nomination process which includes review and comment of the
proposed nomination by Edina's Planning Commission. Planner Repya advised the
Board that she would discuss placing the nomination on the Planning Commission's
calendar with Planning Director, Craig Larsen. The Commission will most likely
address the nomination at their November 30th meeting. No formal action was taken.
I11. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN:
Consultant Vogel advised the Board that as they continue formulating of the Historic
Preservation Plan a disaster management plan should be considered. It is the
purpose of such a plan to have a strategy in place to address damage to historic
structures. The key players involved should be the first responders, i.e., police, fire
and the City's building inspectors. Such plans identify the protocol for an emergency
response coordinator who is usually the chief building inspector.
Minutes — October 11, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Mr. Vogel pointed out that firemen play an important role in the immediate response
and clean-up of historic structures. It is important that the firemen and building
officials are aware of the historic structures in the community so when they are called
to an emergency situation at such structures, they can put into practice the protocol
that has been established. Mr. Vogel observed that the City of Eden Prairie has an
interesting solution with protecting their historic structures that he will share with the
Board.
Discussion ensued regarding the disaster management concept. When asked where
in the plan one might find reference to disaster management, Mr. Vogel explained
that it would be a component of the Objectives, Issues and Actions section.
Member Kojetin asked if the abandonment or neglect of historic structures would be
addressed within the Preservation Plan. Mr. Vogel pointed out that unlike some cities,
the neglect and abandonment of structures is really not problematic in Edina. There
are protections already built into the City's building and zoning codes that address the
abandonment and neglect of structures. Member Forrest observed that she felt
Member Kojetin made a good point; as time goes by and more structures are
designated historic, neglect could become an issue. Board members agreed that it
would be appropriate to address abandoned and neglected structures in the
preservation plan so as to dovetail with the city codes.
A brief discussion ensued. No formal action was taken.
IV. INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD TRAIL SURVEY:
Consultant Vogel explained that the City of Edina proposes to use federal
transportation funds to construct an eight -foot wide pedestrian trailway along the north
side of Interlachen Boulevard from Vernon to Blake Road, thence along the east side
of Interlachen north to the Hopkins city limits; continuing along the west side of Blake
Road to the LRT trail. The federal grant funds are administered by the Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Pursuant to Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), MnDOT needs to determine whether the project will
have an adverse effect on any properties listed in or eligible for the National Register
of Historic Places.
MnDOT has agreed to allow the City of Edina to conduct the necessary surveys to
demonstrate compliance with NHPA Section 106. The City has contracted with me to
carry out a Phase I or reconnaissance -level survey of the trailway corridor, including
the area of potential effects within the City of Hopkins. The objective of the Phase I
survey is to identify buildings and structures more than 50 years old and evaluate their
historical and architectural significance. Historic properties that appear to meet the
National Register eligibility criteria may need to be intensively surveyed, at the
discretion of MnDOT, to compile all of the information needed to fully evaluate their
historic preservation value.
2
Minutes – October 11, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
To date, Consultant Vogel explained that he has inspected over one hundred
buildings in the proposed trailway corridor. Of those, about half were constructed
prior to 1955. One property, the Paul Peterson House, 5312 Interlachen (built in
1882), has already been designated an Edina Heritage Landmark and is therefore
considered National Register eligible. Preliminary data suggest that three
properties—the Interlachen Country Club golf course and club house 6200
Interlachen (built in 1911/1919); the Schendel property, 5224 Interlachen (built in
1921); and the Keck property, 420 Blake (built in 1915)—may also be worthy of
consideration as high -potential heritage preservation resources. Historical
background research and field survey work continues.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that he expects to submit the final report of the Phase I survey
in time for the HPB's November meeting. If Phase II intensive survey is required,
there may be opportunities for volunteer participation in data collection—for example,
in reconstructing the design and construction history of Interlachen Country Club. A
brief discussion ensued among the Board. Member Yue stated that he is writing an
article about the proposed trail for the Edina High School newspaper The Zephyrus
and asked who he could interview to receive more information. Planner Repya
explained that City Engineer, Wayne Houle would be a great contact for the article,
and offered to assist in arranging the interview. No formal action was taken.
V. BROWNDALE BRIDGE REHABILITATION:
Consultant Vogel explained that work has progressed with the plans to restore and
stabilize the Browndale Bridge. At this time, chunks of concrete are peeling away due
to road water run-off and road salt. Of the several approaches that could be used, it
is felt that a system of creating somewhat of a slipcover over the existing bridge and
reengineering the curbs to prevent further run-off and salt would be the best
approach.
Mr. Vogel observed that the bridge was designed by a Hennepin County Engineer in
1906 and was truly over engineered. The proposed improvements will more than
likely ensure another 100 years for the structure. He added that the best time to do
the work on the bridge will be when the water is at its lowest point. If need be, the
creek will be dammed up, which will also be a perfect time for investigating the creek
bed.
Board members thanked Mr. Vogel for the update and indicated that they looked
forward to receiving more information as the project progresses.
3
Minutes - October 11, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
VI. MINNESOTA PRESERVATION CONFERENCE REPORT:
Member Kojetin reported that he attended the Friday, September 16th session of the
Minnesota Heritage Preservation Conference in Duluth, representing the Edina
HPB. The highlights of the conference for Kojetin were the sessions on bridges,
a tour of historic houses and lunch at the historic Gitchi Gummi Club. He stated that
the SHPO (State Historic Preservation Office) staff does a very good job with the
conference every year, and pointed out that it provides a wonderful opportunity to
get to know HPB members from other communities and to share common
experiences. Member Kojetin added that he would encourage Board members to
attend next years meeting which will be held in Red Wing.
VII. PRESERVATION FORUM 2006 IN BALTIMORE:
Consultant Vogel advised the Board that the 2006 Forum of the National Alliance of
Preservation Commissions will be held next July 27 — 30 in Baltimore, MD. He
pointed out that several suburban Baltimore communities have very similar
histories as Edina. - an example would be the Roland Park neighborhood which is
one of the historic neighborhood Samuel Thorpe emulated when designing Edina's
Country Club District area.
Historically, the Forum sessions have provided a series of interactive programs on
issues and problems faced by heritage preservation boards. Problems are
presented and facilitators work with the groups to identify solutions and in the end,
provide a report. All in all, a very worthwhile, learning experience for attendees, not
to mention a great opportunity to tour Baltimore and its suburbs.
Mr. Vogel explained that federal grant money is available to defray the cost of the
conference if members of Edina's HPB were interested in attending. He promised
to get back to the Board at the December meeting to see if there was interest in
applying for a funding grant. No formal action was taken.
VIII. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2007 MEETING:
Consultant Vogel explained that the City of St. Paul will be hosting the 2007
conference of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. Mr. Vogel is serving on
the steering committee, and suggested that the Board consider ways they may be
involved, such as hosting a tour of Edina. The program for the conference will be
created sometime in 2006 and Mr. Vogel promised to keep the Board updated.
No formal action was taken.
4
Minutes — October 11, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: November 8, 2005 (Election Day) 8:00 p.m.
Board members agreed that the November 8th meeting should again be held at
Historical Society. Although Arneson Acres also serves as a voter precinct, the
election is held downstairs, and since the meeting must start at 8:00 p.m., once
the polls close. There should not be a conflict.
X. ADJOURNMENT: 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
0
5
AGENDA
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
4801 W. 501h STREET
EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
L APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: October 11, 2005
IL COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN:
III. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE GUIDE:
IV. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT DESIGN REVIEW:
V. NEXT MEETING DATES: January 3, 2006 5:00 p.m. — Joint meeting with City Council
January 10, 2006 7:00 p.m. — Regular meeting of the HPB
VI. OTHER BUSINESS:
VII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2005, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50"' STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Arlene
Forrest, Lou Blemaster, Chris Rofidal and Ian Yue
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara and David Runyan
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Kojetin moved for approval of the minutes from the October 11, 2005
meeting. Member Thorpe seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
If. COMPREHENSIVE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN:
In keeping with the established format for the preservation plan, Consultant Vogel
prepared a draft copy of the "Objectives, Issues and Actions" section of the plan;
which will serve as a policy manual, and make up the heart of the planning document.
Consultant Vogel explained that the document lists 10 broad program objectives with
issues which will provide background and strategies or actions which will set out
policies for achieving each objective. He then walked the Board through each phase
of the document, highlighting the following 10 main objectives:
Objectives:
1. Prepare and adopt a heritage preservation plan.
2. Identify significant heritage resources worthy of consideration in community
planning.
3. Evaluate heritage resources to determine whether they meet defined criteria of
historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance.
Minutes — December 13, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
4. Rezone significant heritage resources as Edina Heritage Landmarks or Landmark
Districts.
5. Protect heritage landmarks through design review.
6. Carry out public facilities maintenance and construction projects in such a manner
that significant heritage resources are not destroyed or damaged.
7. Encourage voluntary compliance with historic preservation treatment standards.
8. Preserve significant heritage resources on city property.
9. Provide public education in heritage preservation.
10. Participate in the federal -state -local government heritage preservation
partnership.
Mr. Vogel pointed out that the Heritage Preservation Plan, as written, follows the
same format as the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. As the rough draft of the
Heritage Plan is reviewed, it will be important to make sure that it is consistent with
the Comp Plan and that there are no conflicts.
Discussion ensued regarding the remaining work to be completed on the plan and the
tentative schedule. Mr. Vogel explained that all sections of the plan have been
completed. Because the Board has not had an opportunity to review this last section,
having just received it this evening, it was suggested that the Board spend the next
month reviewing the Objectives, Issues and Strategies section. At the next meeting,
in January, he recommended that the Board fine tune this last section, then in
February, the rough draft of the entire report will be ready for their review.
A brief discussion ensued. No formal action was taken.
III. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE GUIDE:
This item was continued until the January 2006 meeting.
IV. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT DESIGN REVIEW:
Planner Repya explained that since the Country Club District has been designated a
Heritage Landmark District for two years, now would be a good time to reflect on the
building activity the Board has reviewed over that time. She also pointed out that the
joint meeting with the City Council will take place on January 3, 2006, at which time
the Council members will want to discuss the Certificate of Appropriateness
PA
Minutes — December 13, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
applications that have been approved, particularly as they pertain to the teardown of
homes.
Board members asked if the tear down of homes is of particular concern to the
Council. Ms. Repya stated although there have been only three teardowns since the
district was designated, Council members do receive comments and questions from
neighbors when a tear down is underway. The nature of the questions center around
the question of "How can houses be torn down if the district has a landmark
designation?"
Consultant Vogel recalled that when the Country Club District went through the
landmark designation process, the Council made it clear that all 550 homes should be
treated the same because the designation is for the district, not each specific home.
Furthermore, the standards guiding the Board when making a decision on a
Certificate of Appropriateness are whether the plans demonstrate compliance with the
Plan of Treatment.
The question was raised as to whether a proposed teardown would ever be denied.
Mr. Vogel stated that only if a home within the district has its own landmark
designation with a plan of treatment that specifically indicates that the home may not
be removed. Currently, of the 550 homes in the district, none are individually
designated. He added that the Council made it clear that they had no intention to
freeze the neighborhood in time. Their intent was for the Board to control change
through the Plan of Treatment.
Chairman Nyberg observed that the neighborhood concerns may be two fold. First, a
lack of understanding as to what the landmark designation is all about; and secondly
the lack of notification ... one day a wrecking ball shows up and the house next door is
gone.
Member Kojetin concurred with Nyberg and asked if some type of notification would
be appropriate.
Consultant Vogel explained that notification of an impending Certificate of
Appropriateness to the neighborhood is not part of the process established in the
ordinance; nor does he think it should be. Unlike a Variance request whereby a
homeowner is asking for a variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance at a
public hearing; the plans reviewed through a Certificate of Appropriateness comply
with provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. (Note — If variances were required, a
homeowner must go to the Zoning Board of Appeals before applying for a Certificate
of Appropriateness.)
Chairman Nyberg asked if the Board could require the owner of a home that has
received a Certificate of Appropriateness to build a new home to post a sign with a
rendering of the new home in the front yard. In that way, the neighbors would be
aware that a change is on the way.
3
Minutes — December 13, 2005
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Member Forrest observed that there appears to be some misunderstanding among
the Country Club District residents as to what the landmark designation is all about;
adding that perhaps more education would be in order.
Consultant Vogel pointed out that there are several approaches the Board could take
toward opening up a dialogue with the neighborhood, to include informational
meetings and/or informational brochures.
Member Thorpe observed that the landmark designation of the district has been a
learning process for everyone; not only the HPB and City Staff, but residents and their
architects and contractors as well. She agreed that now is a good time to evaluate
what is working and where improvements can be made ... and it appears
communication is an important element.
Following a brief discussion, Board members agreed that they looked forward to the
meeting with the City Council on January 3rd to gain their insights on the work of the
Board thus far. No formal action was taken.
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 3, 2006 5:00 p.m. Joint meeting with City Council
January 10, 2006 7:00 p.m. Regular meeting of the HPB
VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyc&Repyal
4
MEETING
OF THE 1
REGULAR BOARD
THE V AT%ON
OF pRESER T 7;00 P.M. OOM
MINUTES ERITAGE Y 10 2006 A ENCE R
F -C JAr1UAR MAYOR'S CONFER Th P
Y Marie
Or e, LOU
rg,
TU NA CITY 1•IAN STREET gob K°letin,
EST 5 Gary Ny .
480'► W 0 Chalrman d Chris
Ro{idal an and Ian Yue
EMBERS PRESENT • glemaster an David Runt
M prlene Forrest,
BSENT : Karen F errara,
MBERS A e Yap ASSOciate Planner
ME Boyce R P
STAFF PRESENT survey they
lamed the pressed
Voters e)( bers exp
League o{ W omen Board mem rOGess for
tuber O{ the L ds and Commissi e ublic Part►cipatwn P
eir to the P
a me City define
s gOar
Idelle Longman, { all the forth desire
are conducting the League
their thanks 13,
the community. THE MINUTES:
the pecember13carried.
1. ApPROVAI" OF royal o{ the minute Allo ed aleThe motion
.
moved for aPP seconded the motion.
Member KMember Thorpe recon COUNCIL
meeting 1?H THE CITY CO City Council
M;
prc
par
Stu(
Ms. i' ya
that h
some
SESSION W with the
VARY 3RD WORK ended the workdsCon n tvogel. arhte a,
sultan icular►Y
11. JAN d that she attROfidel� an Club District was that it
a eXPlaine Kojebn and the C°untry consensus
planner RePy bers Nyberg d the activihomeS. The general ations•
with Mem aroun ObSery
O{ existing great dialogue and w'
along centered down them on
conVersatiolo the tear roviding 9 1deaS and advise
they relate roductive meeting; P
was a very P to mull over the following
the HPg ertY owners•
The Council asked to adjacent Prof what is regu
might be ach1eved regarding
they ending teardown hborhoOd
o{ an impending
the nejg Prior
to the
Notificat10n communication Varchitect P lace a I
ent. the aPOcan to rep
Enhancing lan of treatm meeting w►th ropriateness rove
through the P ary me of PAPP the Plans app
Ing a prelimin t fora CertificatecOmPlies with
'
eco ttal of a request construction
subm that the new
Ensurance ectionS.
periodic in,P
will provide
3
Minutes _
Edina January 10, 2006
Heritage preservation 8
oard
The current fo,.
Minutes — January 10, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
hands-on experience in resource identification and evaluation. The work is proposed
to take place over the next several months.
Board members discussed the project, agreeing that it would be an excellent
experience, and they would be happy to provide assistance. No formal action was
taken.
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: February 14, 2006
Planner Repya announced that this was Chairman Nyberg's last meeting. He has served on the
Heritage Preservation Board since 1982, and provided an invaluable service to not only the
Board, but the entire City. Board members expressed their sadness to see Nyberg leave their
ranks and wished him the very best in the future.
VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
.roymRepya
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, JANUARY 10, 2006, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, Bob Kojetin, Marie Thorpe, Lou
Blemaster and Chris Rofidal
MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara, Arlene Forrest, David Runyan and Ian Yue
STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
Idelle Longman, a member of the League of Women Voters explained the survey they
are conducting of all the City's Boards and Commissions. Board members expressed
their thanks to the League for their desire to define the public participation process for
the community.
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Member Kojetin moved for approval of the minutes from the December 13, 2005
meeting. Member Thorpe seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
II. JANUARY 3RD WORK SESSION WITH THE CITY COUNCIL:
Planner Repya explained that she attended the work session with the City Council
along with Members Nyberg, Kojetin and Rofidel, and Consultant Vogel. The
conversation centered around the activities in the Country Club District particularly as
they relate to the tear down of existing homes. The general consensus was that it
was a very productive meeting; providing great dialogue and observations.
The Council asked the HPB to mull over the following ideas and advise them on ways
they might be achieved:
• Notification of an impending teardown to adjacent property owners.
• Enhancing communication with the neighborhood regarding what is regulated
through the plan of treatment.
• Requiring a preliminary meeting with the applicant/architect prior to the
submittal of a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace a home.
• Ensurance that the new construction complies with the plans approved via
periodic inspections.
Minutes — January 10, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
The current fee for all Certificates of Appropriateness is $175.00. Explore
increasing the fee for a tear down/rebuild to cover the costs of additional
meetings and inspections.
Chairman Nyberg observed that the City Council shares the frustration the HPB has
experienced in satisfying the Country Club neighbors who feel strongly the City should
not allow the tear down of homes in the district.
Member Thorpe agreed with Nyberg, pointing out that some people are under the
misconception that a landmark designation means the area will be frozen in time.
She added that better communicating the goals and vision for the neighborhood will
be an important step.
Planner Repya concurred with Mrs. Thorpe, pointing out that in many parts of the
country, a landmark designation means nothing (to include paint color) can be
changed without review and approval; furthermore teardowns would rarely be
tolerated. However, in the case of the Country Club District, the plan of treatment
crafted for the neighborhood works toward ensuring the neighborhood plan and
historic presence will be protected through the review and approval of new structures
introduced to the neighborhood; and also ensuring that new structures meet the
standards established in the plan of treatment.
Ms. Repya added that the City's web site would be one place to better communicate
the heritage preservation goals and vision for the community. Currently the Heritage
Preservation section of the site explains that the HPB is advisory to the City Council
on all matters relating to heritage resource preservation, protection and enhancement
in the community. It then goes on to list the properties designated as heritage
landmarks. The Country Club District brochure explaining the designation and the
plan of treatment for the neighborhood is also available.
Ms. Repya proposed that the website be revamped to include a separate page for the
Country Club neighborhood. Included on that page might be a section entitled
"Frequently Asked Questions" where some of the miscommunication issues can be
addressed. Board members agreed that would be a good idea and asked Ms. Repya
to send them a list of proposed questions to discuss at the next meeting in February.
Member Kojetin observed that one of the Council members felt that the brochure we
have been depending on to explain the designation comes across as somewhat
vague. He suggested that another brochure be created that gets more to the point
what the landmark designation of the neighborhood is meant to achieve; and a
question/answer format might be a good start to clarify the rules.
Chairman Nyberg pointed out that another concern addressed was the possibility that
a new home might not be built to the plans approved by the Certificate of
Appropriateness. In addition to periodic review of the project to ensure compliance,
Nyberg suggested that the homeowner sign a statement attesting that the building will
2
Minutes — January 10, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
be constructed to the specifications of the plans approved by the HPB. In doing so,
the homeowner is then aware that if exterior plans do change, they need to come
back to the Heritage Preservation Board for a new Certificate of Appropriateness.
Nyberg also suggested that the Board require a rendering of the new home be placed
on the property once the Certificate of Appropriateness is approved to alert the
neighborhood that a new home will be built; and in doing so, depict what the new
home will look like. The advantage will be two fold: first, it will alert the neighbors of
the change, and secondly, it will tie the builder to the plan depicted in the rendering.
Then, if the new building looks different than the rendering, the neighborhood will be
watching too. Board members agreed that would be a good idea. Planner Repya
stated that she could add that requirement to the list attached to the application form.
No formal action was taken.
Ill. ARCHITECTURAL STYLE GUIDE:
Planner Repya explained that Consultant Vogel has prepared an Architectural Style
Guide presentation as a resource for the Heritage Preservation Board. Due to his
absence from the meeting, the presentation will be rescheduled to a future meeting.
IV. INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD TRAIL SURVEY: Update
Planner Repya reminded the Board that in addition to the consulting work Robert
Vogel does for the HPB, the City's Engineering Department has hired Mr. Vogel to
conduct the required historical and architectural survey for a proposed recreational
trail on the north side of Interlachen Boulevard. Vogel has completed the first phase
of the survey and determined that the following properties have potential historical
significance and will require a further Phase II survey to determine whether they would
be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places:
• 5224 Interlachen Boulevard — private residence
• 5312 Interlachen Boulevard — private residence
• 5528 Interlachen Boulevard — private residence
• 6200 Interlachen Boulevard — Interlachen Country Club
Ms. Repya explained that while the HPB has no responsibilities to oversee this
project, the information provided to the City will be very beneficial to the Board;
particularly with regard to the goals and priorities identified in the Historic Context
Study under Context IX. Entitled "Country Clubs and Parks".
Ms. Repya further advised the Board that within the report, Mr. Vogel has indicated
that he hopes to have volunteers from the Heritage Preservation Board to assist with
some of the archival research and field survey. Participation by the HPB will provide
KI
Minutes — January 10, 2006
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
hands-on experience in resource identification and evaluation. The work is proposed
to take place over the next several months.
Board members discussed the project, agreeing that it would be an excellent
experience, and they would be happy to provide assistance. No formal action was
taken.
V. NEXT MEETING DATE: February 14, 2006
Planner Repya announced that this was Chairman Nyberg's last meeting. He has served on the
Heritage Preservation Board since 1982, and provided an invaluable service to not only the
Board, but the entire City. Board members expressed their sadness to see Nyberg leave their
ranks and wished him the very best in the future.
Vl. ADJOURNMENT: 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
joycei RePYCE/
0