Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-02-12 PacketDRAFT MINUTES CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday February 12, 2015 7:05 PM I. CALL TO ORDER 7:05p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering Roll Call was Anderson, Glahn, Gubrud, Howard, Kostuch, Latham, Padmanabhan, Sierks, Thompson, Waddick, and Chair Heer Absent: Zarrin Staff Present: Ross Bintner and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA. Member Latham requested Urban Forest Task Force Report to be added to the Agenda. - Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Gubrud to approve the amended Meeting Agenda. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes. Member Anderson requested a spelling change on item VIII.I. "DECCA" should be changed to "DECA". r. B. Attendance report and roster. Member Howard noticed Member Zarrin was marked as attending the January meeting, but she was absent, C. Workgroup list and minutes. Member Sierks requested Tim Rudnicki to be removed from the Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. Member Waddick requested Laurie Bruno and Michelle Jordan to be removed from the,W ter Quality Working Group. Motion made by Member Kostuch-and seconded by Member Thompson to approve the remaining Consent Agenda. -Motion carried unanlmousl*.:..... V. COMMUNITY COMMENT. No comment. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Chicken Ordinance. Member Latham reported that on the day of the January 20, 2015 City Council meeting, Council received an e-mail from Edina resident, Ross Plaetzer of 4058 Sunnyside Road. Because the Local Food Working Group (LFWG) and the Edina Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) had no opportunity to review the e-mail prior to the Council meeting, Council declined to approve the EEC's proposed fowl amendments at the January 20, 2015 first reading and directed EEC to review the facts in the e-mail and make recommendations on the requests in the e-mail prior to Council's second reading of the fowl amendments, which is scheduled for March 17, 2015. Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Gubrud to adopt the report as written. Motion carried unanimously. 3 A. Bees. Member Latham said Scott Neal pulled the report, because he didn't have time to read it and talk to the staff that'll be involved with the new ordinance. The only issue is that of whether a neighbor within 200 feet of an apiary lot line can compel an apiary registration revocation by showing a documented past anaphylaxis due to a bee sting, without documenting what kind of bee, or whether the City Council will adopt a higher standard, as recommended by the Energy and Environment Commission, showing a documented past anaphylaxis specifically due to a honeybee (Apismellifera) sting. Both alternatives are presented in the proposed policy for Council to consider. The Council's second reading is scheduled for March 17, 2015. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Glahn to adopt the policy with the alternative of specific to honey bee stings as we initially proposed, but we are including the other alternative of bees generally in case that is Council's pleasure. Motion carried unanimously. B. Community Solar Update. Member Sierks said the application of assistance was approved for Community Solar. Subcommittee may recommend an RFP will be written once the committee knows what the different issues are insurance, liability, rates, etc. are needed. There's two ways to do solar development as a public entity. First, Met Council is looking at having as big as project as they can with as few members as they can, so they can get the highest potential return or lowest cost to pay for solar. A project needs to have at least five partners. Second, Minneapolis has a lot of community interest, so they want to make solar available to residents, so the more people the higher the cost will be. Is our intent to make it available for the community,, or are we maximizing City's return on investment. Chair Heer excused himself from the meeting at 7:41pm. Mr. Bintner said all.of the action will be with big companies. He suggested reviewing Hennepin County and Met Council's RFA work with private developers, and that trying to take on a developer role directly would be'a big risk., ifthe ,city were to purchase credits, you cannot claim carbon reduction, but if you choose, to Buy Renewal Energy Credits, there would no longer be a savings; instead you would pay more for energy, similar to Windsource. C. Grandview Advisory. Acting Chair Kostuch reviewed two different Advisories to Council referencing adding environmental principals to the Grandview planning development. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Thompson to move the Grandview Advisory listing examples of environmental actions. Motion carried. Member Glahn opposed. Acting Chair Kostuch would like Mr. Bintner to follow up on past Advisory's to Council to see if action has been taken on them. D. March 12 Televised Meeting Prep. Acting Chair Kostuch asked Members what topics should be reviewed during the March televised meeting. He requested all Members to create a summary of their topic to be prepared. The following Members are responsible for the Working Group or Subcommittee Reports. • Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee - Sierks • Business Recycling Working Group - Zarrin • City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee - Kostuch • Community Solar Subcommittee - Sierks • Education Outreach Working Group - Thompson • Home Energy Squad Subcommittee - Gubrud • Local Food Working Group - Latham • Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group - Zarrin • Student Subcommittee —Anderson & Padmanabhan • Urban Forest Task Force Report - Latham • Water Quality Working Group - Waddick Mr. Bintner has extended an invite to Rick Carter for a Regional Indicators Initiative update. Karen Kurt will present on Vision Edina. Center for Energy and Environment will discuss Home Energy Squad. Mr. Bintner will present Building Energy Annual Summary. Kostuch will give an overview of the Purchasing Report. Member Latham will present >as:a resident on the Urban Forest Task Force Report and Local Food Working Group. Talk briefly on 2015 Work Plan. Ask residents to join working groups. Elections of Chair and Vice Chair for 2015/16 will occur.. It'll be the first meeting for the three new members. E. April 7 EEC/CC Joint Workshop Prep. Acting Chair Kostuch reviewed slides that'll be presented at the meeting. The meeting is to ask Council how Edina is going to reach their Chapter 10 goals in the Comp Plan. The goal should remind Council what they signed on for and how can EEC help you. Per Council's request, EEC has prioritized from their Worth Plan the following in order of importance. 1. City Building Energy Efficiency initiatiue;; a. EEC Commissioners to work with City Manager and City Building manager to create a detailed plan for retrofitting existing buildings within 5 years b..Atleast one building will be retrofitted in 2015 either under the City's own effort or under the State GESP program 2.: Expand Citysubsidized Haute Energy Squad (HES) installs for residents a. The City Witt fund 150 HES installs at a cost of $10,500; prioritize for lower income (a dramatic irtcrease,over the current funding of $4000) b. EEC witteducate and promote HES with the goal to get 500 visits in the year. 3. Measureriftent — continue to use and refine metrics and analyses a. B3 datab1.a efor all City Buildings b. Create met for City vehicle fleets (gallons of fuel) c. Create metrics for Utility operations (energy usage) d. Regional, Indicators for City as a whole 4.. City Capital! Process Environmental Considerations Initiative a. EEC to review results of having an environmental considerations section in 2014 CIP process. EEC commissioners will work with City staff to refine and expand so that all capital decisions (i.e., new buildings, major building renovations and fleet purchases) have explicitly environmental analysis on how they will affect City GHG VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS. No Report. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee. No Report. B. Business Recycling Working Group. No Report. C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee. No Report. D. Community Solar Subcommittee. No Report. E. Education Outreach Working Group. Member Howard announced the continuation of their occasional film series with "Cowspiracy" on the 3'd Friday of April. Member Thompson gave an update on the April Bch forum. The topic will be "Here Comes the Sun" which is about Community Solar. The guest speakers will be from Lisa from CERTS and Paul Douglas. Chair Heer arrived at 8:57p.m. The Member's reviewed the forum's press release. There is concern about not enough time is being spent on the solar topic like originally planned. There will be a resource fair before the guest speakers. F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee. Member Gubrud said 390installs have occurred since 2010. There has been 18 installs since November. There are nine scheduled and there are five low income candidates. The year the City did subsidies was the biggest installs. G. Local Food Working Group. No Report. H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group. Member Latham reviewed the revised Collection of Compost ordinance. The change was to eliminate the option of co -collecting organics with recycling. The organics will be stored in a separate bag that'd be put into recycling, but worried about the bag breaking and contaminating the recycling. This new ordinance will need to be reviewed in a Council work session. Motion made by Member Latham and seconded by Member Sleeks to accept the change. Motion carried. Member Glahn opposed. Urban Forest Task Force Report. Member Latham gave, an update on the Park Board meeting. They adopted the Emerald Ash Bore proposal. They also adopted the change to the ordinance on boulevard trees. The section 36 changes were forwarded tothe Planning Commission. The Living Streets initiative was forwarded to the Transportation Commission. The Green Steps Cities best practices were'tabled to their working group on urban forest task force. The recommendation to adopt Minneapolis's park board do not plant list was tabled to their work group. Certifying selected city parks as autobahn cooperative sanctuary was tabled to their strategic plan. Buckthorn maintenance will follow up with a maintenance: plan was tabled to their strategic plan. The garden council will help cleanup buckthorn in BredesemPark. The tree preservation ordinance was passed by council. I. Student Subcommittee. Member Anderson said he talked to the solar panel engineer and said designs are changing. The students are still doing fundraising too. Member Thompson said a group was getting started at Valley View Middle School. J. Water Quality Working Group. Member Waddick gave an update on the outreach to Arden Park houses along creek to install buffers. Her working group will talk about Storm Drain Issues at the April forum. The group has discussed salt usage outreach to 25 businesses. They have been passing out two flyers, Residential Snow and Ice Care and Winter Maintenance Hiring Someone. Storm drain stenciling will start again in Spring. The meeting will change to the second Tuesday of the month. K. 2015 EEC Schedule and Workplan. March meeting televised. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. EEC Member Updates. Mr. Bintner thanked Member Latham and Chair Heer for their services due to their terms ending. The EEC Members were very appreciative of their work. B. Project Updates. No Report. 6 There was a discussion on who's willing to be Chair and Vice Chair for 2015. The three new EEC Members will be announced on February 17`h. The Council will be assigning an alternate member too. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Heer declared the meeting adjourned at 9:42p.m. Motion made by Member Glahn and seconded by Member Kostuch to adjourn meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator Liaisons: Report attendance monthly and attach this report to the Commission minutes for the packet. Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers & attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meetina Held (ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded (ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "1" under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type "1" under "Work Session" on the meetings' line. Type 1" under "Work Session" for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "ll under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type "1" under the month on the meetings' line. Type "ll under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously -scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. Edina Energy & Environment Commission Working Groups and Subcommittees Draft of 2-12-15 Building Energy_ Efficiency Subcommittee - Chair Sierks, Members: Bill Glahn, Keith Kostuch Objective: This subcommittee will tivork with Citr staff to recommend to Council a cornprehen.sive approach fur achieving deeper energy efficiency actions for the city's buildings that maximizes greenhouse gas reductions, maximizes energy saved and dollars saved, and maximizes effective use of cite dollars. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee — Chair Keith Kostuch, Members: John Heer Objective: This sub -committee of the EEC tivill work with City staff to find a way to embed the 2008 Conynrehensive Plan Chapter 10 environmental commitments into the City's capital budget process. Ne�v buildings, major building renovations and fleet purchases have large and long-term enviromnental implications. Consegitenth�, environnnental considerations need to be made more explicit at the inception of all capital projects and in the approval process up to City Council final approval. Tinne franne: This process will be collaborative with City staff in terms of'conceptualization and implementation so it will take most or all of 2014. Community Solar Subcommittee - Chair Bill Sierks, Members: Paul Thompson, Bob Gubrud Objective: Worl< with Cite Staff to evaluate whether the Cit_v can host a Comnnrnir>, Solar site. lf'.so, the group will assist its appropriate in completing the steps necessary to apply for, develop, cord market this program, and involve interested members of the public through a working group if the project moves forward to construction Edina Business Recycling Working GrouR— 3`d Wednesday - Chair Sarah Zarrin — Members: Lori Syverson (Chamber of Commerce), Ben Knudson (Hennepin County Environmental Services), Andre Xiong (HCES), Aileen Foley Education Outreach Working Group (EO WG) — I" Tuesday at 7:00 pm - Co -Chairs Paul Thompson and Bob Gubrud — Members: John Howard (EEC), Reilly Anderson, Sunaya Padmanabhan, Sarah Stefanik, Chuck Pretice and Mindy Ahler. Objective: The mission of the Education and Outreach Working Group is to support the charter of the Edina Enemy and Environment Commission by creating awareness and engaging residents, schools, churches, business' and corm unity organizations to take action to conserve and increase energy efficiency, to reuse and recycle, and to preserve and enhance our environnnent Home Energy Squad Subcommittee (HES) — Meets as needed - Chair Bill Sierks — Commissioners - Paul Thompson, Bob Gubrud Objective: This subcommittee works inith Cite staff; Xcel Energy, Centenpoint Encrgy, and the Cernterfor Energy and the Ernviromncnt to implement the Hoare Energy Squad program for Edina's residents. The city's gas and electric utilities have hired CEE to implement to implement the Home Energs� Squad program across their service area. Our subconuniuee is helping to promote the program and maximize its impact in Edina. Local Food Working Group — Chair Dianne Plunkett Latham, Arlene Forrest, Louise Segreto, David Chin, Joeffrey Bodeau, Virginia Kearney, and Jamie Bodeau Objective: Facilitate creation of home%omnnmity gardens, chicken & bee keeping, and incorporation offood growing areas/access in nnultifantily residential developments Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group (RSW WG) — 1" Thursday at 7:00 pm - Chair DP Latham, Commissioners Sara Zarrin and Tim Rudnicki - Members Michelle Horan, Lauren Satterlee, Melissa Seeley — City Staff Solvei Wilmot Objective: Evahiatc and monitor the prori.sion of a residential recycling progrcart. Evaluate crud monitor the provision of a private h, provided solid waste program, as well as a reduction in municipal solid haste produced by cite residents and businesses. Educate the public about rec Ycling Student Working roup — EEC Chair, Members: Paul Thompson, Student Members, and open to students attending secondary schools in Edina. Objective: To f wilitate, coordinate and share inrformation between the EEC chid the School Euvironmentol groups and to work on comnurii energy and environmental objectives as appropriate. To assist in developing environmental leaders of tomorrow. Water Quality Working Group (WQ WG) — ls` Thursday at 6:30pm - Chair Lou Ann Waddick — Members: David B. VanDongen, Jon Moon, Steve Wielock, Katherine Winston, Sue Nissen and Randy Holst Objective: To facilitate communication between citi..ens and cite government and champion efforts to improve water qualitY within Ednra. 10 WQWG Thursday, February 5th, 2015 in attendance: Louann Waddick, David Dongen, Jon Moon, Katharine Winston, Steve Weilock Discussed ways to do outreach in Arden park neighborhood, mainly this homes that abut the creek. How to find and contact a household that would be willing to host us for a small gathering of neighbors interested in doing BMP's regarding water on their property - Postcard mailing? Door flyer? neighborhood association? email?etc. Ask Becky at MCWD if she has a contact in that area and to better define what cost shares would be available. Our group would like to be present at the mtgs that begin soon regarding the street reconstruction that begins in2016 in Morningside/White Oaks neighborhoods. Paul Thompson stopped in to give us info on the forum and ask if we will have an info table there -Yes. Discussed our salt use outreach: 3 of us have contacted about 25 businesses and students with our brochures and discussed with them how to reduce salt use. Dale Riley, manager at Jerry's foods, would like to meet with me, the contractor who does the whole stretch of businesses there and someone at the city. Discussed changing the night we meet to an evening on the 2nd week of each month. IE Business Recipients of Hennepin County Recycling and Composting Grants in Edina Environmental partners: The Hennepin County Environmental Partners program recognizes businesses for their efforts to recycle and divert organic waste, which includes food scraps Business name Address Edina Cinema 3911 West 50th St, Edina, MN, 55424 Edina Grill 5028 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 Salut 5032 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 12 Grant Business name Round Address Address 2 50th & France Fall 2013 3925 W 50th St, B100 Edina, MN 55424 International Dairy Queen Fall 2013 7505 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Minnesota Lice Lady Fall 2014 3940 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Environmental partners: The Hennepin County Environmental Partners program recognizes businesses for their efforts to recycle and divert organic waste, which includes food scraps Business name Address Edina Cinema 3911 West 50th St, Edina, MN, 55424 Edina Grill 5028 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 Salut 5032 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 12 CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday March 12, 2015 7:00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Minutes B. Attendance report and roster C. Workgroup list and minutes V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment, " the Energy & Environment Commission will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission, or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Commission might refer the matter to staff or to an EEC Working Group for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Vision Edina B. Regional Indicators Initiative C. Home Energy Squad D. Recycling and Solid Waste Annual Summary E. Energy Annual Summary F. Annual Purchasing Policy Report G. 2015 EEC Workplan H. Discussion of April Work Session with Council VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS VIII.CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS A. Building Energy Efficiency Subcommittee B. Business Recycling Working Group C. City Environmental Considerations Subcommittee D. Community Solar Subcommittee E. Education Outreach Working Group F. Home Energy Squad Subcommittee G. Local Food Working Group H. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group I. Student Subcommittee J. Urban Forest Task Force K. Water Quality Working Group IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair for March 2015 -February 2016 Term UPCOMING EVENTS AND MEETINGS: http://www.edinamn.gov/ <click calendar> The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-92 7-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Business recycling The commercial sector generates more than half of the total waste in Hennepin County, and nearly two-thirds of the waste created at businesses and non -profits is recyclable. Having a strong recycling program conserves natural resources and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, can help your bottom line, and demonstrates your organization's commitment to sustainability and the community. Hennepin County offers grants, signage, technical assistance and case studies to help business and organizations start or improve recycling programs. Grant funding are available again in 2015. Please contact Andre Xiong at andre.x.xiong@hennepin.us or 612- 543-1316 to discuss business recycling grant project ideas and future funding opportunities. 13 14 EOWG Meeting Notes - Feb. 5, 2015 Meeting called to order at 7:07 pm in the Community Room at Edina City Hall In attendance: Paul Thompson, John Howard, Cathy Weller (Valley View Teacher), Sarah Stefanik, Reilly Anderson, Bob Gubrud, Mindy Ahler, Zach Streit (South View Environmental Group - SVEG), Maribel (guest), Dulce (Valley View student). Chuck Prentice arrived at 7:41 pm. Meeting began with introductions of the group, which is the largest in EOWG history. Minutes from Jan. were approved without amendments. Edina Magazine will run community solar story discussed at Jan. meeting. Event update: Main focus of the meeting. Paul Douglas has agreed to be the keynote speaker for the event. His expertise is weather and climate change, and has done numerous events like the Edina environmental forum in 2013. The theme for the event is still "Here Comes the Sun", so EOWG is still pursuing a community solar speaker. Paul has asked CERTs for help. If we cannot find a speaker, then maybe a panel of solar participants. Event agenda: • Resource Fair to be from 6-7pm in foyer outside Fick Auditorium, like in past years. Program will begin at 7pm, but start ushering attendees in at 6:45. • Resource fair participants should be there around 5:30 to set up. Maybe advertise opportunity to have photo op with Paul Douglas or chance to meet him before the program starts as incentive for students to hang around. • Kick off program with intro from mayor and a student. • Speaker 1 • Speaker • Conclude at 8:30 pm. Discussion over whether Paul Douglas should be the first speaker, or lead with community solar. Ms. Weller felt Paul Douglas would be a hard act to follow, and people might leave after he concludes his presentation. Others in the group shared this feeling, but Paul, Bob, Zack liked idea of leading off with Paul Douglas. In the end, it was concluded Paul Douglas would be the first presenter to set the stage for the call to action. 15 Students will definitely will have role. Possibly have students do skits as a bridge between speakers. One idea is to have them looking for solutions, and find community solar. Groups to invite for the Resource Fair: • CEE • Edina Go Green • Edina Energy and Enviro. Commission • Edina Garden Council • Cool Planet (charging station) • SVEG • Project Earth • Valley View Middle School • CERTs • Xcel • CenterPoint • Fresh Energy • Mike Murphy of Grandview Tire • Recycle across America - provide recycling guidance • Hopkins High school solar advocates? Rochester High solar? • MN renewable energy society • MN Solar energy industry association Solar companies were brought up, but probably cannot be done as city avoids commercial partnerships or favoring one business over another. Food for event: • Chartwell, which is school vendor, will provide some food. Paul has requested that it be local and organic. • Sarah Zarrin will organize, has done it for past events. Paul would like event to be zero waste. Possibly give prize for biking, walking or carpooling- give ticket for the raffle for each family that carpools to the event. Advertise sustainable transport by giving out stickers saying "Bike, Walk, Carpool' or something similar. Historically there has been a giveaway of an HES visit, maybe do a solar panel giveaway this year. Entertainment: • Band will provide performers • Paul suggested having some "did you know" facts mixed in with the program like last year. Outreach: • Edina Parent Communication Network (PCN) - put out periodic messages. Ms. Weller and Sarah will investigate. • Zephyrus will cover event - Sarah has been in contact, Ms. Weller offered to talk with Valley View reporters. 16 • Twitter - Edina Schools, Edina • Facebook • Instagram • Newspapers • City Calendar/website • School announcement • Posters • City Extra email • Teacher news area on moodle • City news board Dulce to help with outreach, Zach with SVEG Paul to contact Susan Braut of Edina schools. Paul will meet with City of Edina communications people on Monday. Cost items: • Printing • Possibly advertising • Food • Raffle prize -solar charger would be roughly $110. Non event items: Reilly and Project Earth will be meeting with engineer at AEI, an energy installer, about solar power. Goal is to make sure system will be acceptable to Edina's facility director, Eric Hamilton. Doc Lock, EHS principal, is very supportive of the solar project. Ms. Weller expressed difficulty in interconnecting solar on homes. Sarah announced student leadership meeting at 4 pm at South view next Thursday. Meeting adjourned at 8:48 pm. Next EOWG meeting will be Thursday, March 5 at 7 pm at Edina City Hall. Room TBD. Minutes prepared by John Howard. 17 oy Fe o � ���bRf'Otaf+��� • 1 H Hfl To: Energy and Environment Commission Agenda Item #: 6.A From: Karen M. Kurt Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Date: March 12, 2015 Information Subject: Vision Edina Action Requested: Review draft Strategic Vision and Framework Report and share feedback with City Council. Information / Background: Vision Edina is a broad-based and inclusive community visioning process. The Vision Edina initiative worked with local residents, organizations and businesses to explore: • What is unique and important about living in Edina? • Where is there opportunity or need to evolve or change? • How can we continue to progress to keep the city relevant and attractive to current and future residents and businesses? What is our competitive edge? Vision Edina will serve as an important foundation for other strategic efforts, such as the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plans. When finished, Vision Edina will replace Edina Vision 20/20, which was developed in 2000 and updated in 2003. The City Council is seeking feedback from Board and Commission members prior to their work session on April 21. Members can share feedback 1) individually using Speak Up Edina or email at mail(a edinamn.gov or 2) as a group by submitting comments or meeting minutes to the Assistant City Manager. The goal is to approve the draft Strategic Vision and Framework Report during the month of May. City of Edina • 4801 W. 501h St. • Edina, MN 55424 18 � r n+.AillL r '-VISION EDINA ""CITY OF EDINA DRAFT STRATEGIC VISION and FRAMEWORK -,ion ane frame .;url< sf pr, n ary 201!, CITY OF EDINA DRAFT STRATEGIC VISION AND FRAMEWORK ' VISION EDINA This vision and framework is an outcome of the broad-based community engagement and visioning process, conducted between September and December 2014. January 2015 futur&>l'Q PARTNERS VISION EDINA Vision Edina represents a fresh look at the future for the City of Edina. This work builds on the previous Edina Vision 20/20 planning work that was undertaken 15 years ago. Since that time, the world has changed. We are subject to stronger external trends and forces, and we face renewed pressures with increasing population and developmental growth. The future we face is one filled with greater uncertainty, more rapid pace of change and emerging new opportunities. Vision Edina allows us to step back and look again at the big picture, and decide how we continue to evolve to remain a relevant, competitive and progressive city. Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that helps our community understand and guide the important decision-making that will impact the City's future. This framework lays out the key issues identified by our community, which we need to be focusing our attention and resources on, over the coming years. The Vision Edina work and publications have been developed through a broad-based and inclusive community visioning process conducted In 2014. It is proposed that the current City of Edina mission statement remains unchanged. This is a potent and relevant mission statement that has, and continues to, serve the City well. "Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses:' Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2015 K 4 EDINA'S VISION STATEMENT Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, which remains relevant in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing the future. Within the context of North America and the Twin Cities, Edina is known as a distinguished location that provides the ideal environment to raise families, run businesses and simply enjoy life. The features that define our future community include: Inclusive and Connected • Our community embraces diversity and cherishes the contributions of all residents and stakeholders, whatever their background, age or interests. • The community offers an enticing mix of residential development that retains and builds upon our strong foundation of single-family housing, but also includes a dimension of higher density multi- family options, especially for the young and the old. • Edina strives to promote a healthy demographic mix that builds on the tradition of multi -generational families, and also provides entry opportunities for new people seeking to raise families, start businesses, and join our quality community. • Transportation options of all kinds are available, allowing residents to be connected via a network of transportation modes that fosters mobility for people and connects the community together. • Our cohesive neighborhoods are able to retain their unique individual character, while being linked seamlessly together into the broader fabric of our city, and beyond to the larger metropolitan area. Built -to -Scale Development • The community has worked hard to create an innovative and long-term comprehensive development policy, which strikes the right balance between renewal and progress, and protection and preservation. This has allowed the City to navigate the period of intense redevelopment and create a richer more vibrant city, without losing our historic neighborhoods. • Our development policy promotes and encourages innovative ideas, and we have formed a working partnership between the community and the developers where creative solutions are found to create the best long-term outcome from new developments. • Our community's commercial and retail base has been significantly enhanced through the creation of more mixed-use locations, sympathetically woven throughout our neighborhoods. These small nodes enhance our neighborhood feel and quality of life, and provide important community gathering points. Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2015 • We have proactively developed planning procedures and policies that allow the character of our neighborhoods to be protected and enhanced, and that local development reflects the aspirations of the neighborhood associations and residents. Sustainable Environment • Edina has taken its responsibility for the environment seriously. As a community we have focused and invested in world-class citywide resource management systems, built around the leading principles of environmental sustainability. • We have implemented sophisticated systems, including recycling, energy efficiency and management of water, to the point where we have substantially reduced our overall environmental impact and significantly increased the efficiency in our resource use. • Our planning has integrated the best -proven standards of sustainable building and environmental stewardship into all aspects of our city planning and building codes. We are regarded as a leader in the integration of environmental management into city management and function. • Our community continues to treasure and protect our public spaces and parks, and these have been further enhanced to build biodiversity and natural ecosystems, which in turn support and purify our natural environment. A Community of Learning • Edina has continued to evolve as a highly engaged community, where residents share the responsibility for decision making and working collectively toward the common vision. • We recognize and appreciate the significant value of our education system, and we continue to work and invest to strengthen and grow this key community asset. • As technology and society has evolved, so has our prized education system. We have a high quality, future orientated education system, which undeniably prepares our students to thrive in an increasingly competitive and globalized world. • As residents, we never tire in our pursuit of knowledge and understanding. We collectively promote the value of engagement and education, and we ensure that we have the capacity as a community to understand and remain agile in a fast changing and complex world. Future -Oriented • As a community, we continually look forward and are always working to remain competitive, relevant and innovative. We stand on the foundation of our traditions, but are not afraid to adapt and change as the city evolves. • Our city leaders and organizations are actively engaged in regional leadership and in ensuring the interests of Edina are represented at the level of the Twin Cities metropolis, but also beyond. Our City's priorities and interests are fundamentally Integrated Into the broader regional planning. • Edina is willing to use its privileged position, resources, and expertise to apply new ideas and technology, and we actively invest ourselves in finding and creating Innovative solutions to the emerging challenges of living in a major city. Vision Edina — DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework — Jarwary 2015 5 STRATEGIC FOCUS AREA, ISSUES AND ACTIONS Eight key strategic focus areas have emerged through the Vision Edina process. These areas are built from the key drivers and issues identified early in the Vision Edina process, and have carried through the extensive community and stakeholder engagement process. These focus areas, and the attendant issues and actions, represent emerging priority areas that can both leverage and guide the future evolution of our city. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list, and in no way displaces the underlying foundational work that continues on our key areas of infrastructure, community services, governance, and fiscal management. Rather, these strategic focus areas represent key emerging priorities, and reflect the core drivers of our future that can be summarized in the categories of 'Balancing Edina's Redevelopment', and Enhancing Our Community Fabric and Character'. 6 Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2016 1. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MIX The issue of residential property development has been repeatedly raised throughout the Vision Edina process. The City has been faced with a number of redevelopment pressures and challenges across numerous areas of the city. Residents strongly favor a continued focus on the single-family housing nature of the majority of the city neighborhoods, but there is increasing concern about the trend and impact of so-called 'teardowns' on the community. There is also recognition of some need to develop more multi -family options in order to serve the needs of young professionals and our senior citizens, and create some diversity in housing affordability. ISSUES • Residential neighborhoods continue to serve as the defining characteristic of the city, and there is a high desire to protect and enhance such neighborhoods. • Residents take a great deal of pride in their homes, and express concern about the escalating redevelopment pressures facing some neighborhood areas. • Edina continues to face competition from neighboring communities that claim to offer a similar quality of life while also offering more available land for development. • The community must balance the needs of the families that have defined its character, with an aging population that desires to 'age in place' STRATEGIC ACTIONS • Further encourage the development of the neighborhood associations and the overall neighborhood concept. Define the unique character and brand of each of the well-established neighborhoods, and explore innovative planning guidelines to allow preservation and enhancement of the desired neighborhood visual appeal. • Pursue further planning and development options that protect and locate key amenities, such as parks and community facilities, within the neighborhood framework to allow neighborhood centers and focus points to further evolve. • Continue to explore options and opportunities for new multi -family development opportunities in the Southdale, Pentagon Park, and Grandview areas, and on the appropriate fringes of other mixed-use areas and public spaces. Vision Edna — DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework — January 2015 7 8 2. TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS Participants in the Vision Edina process expressed a strong desire to continue to expand a variety of transportation options to both reduce the dependency on automobiles, but also to enhance the community's ease of connectivity. Access to a variety of biking and walking trail options is a key amenity that helps residents feel connected to their community, and improve the overall quality of life. A diversity of transportation options is also highly preferred among younger residents. However, such options have met resistance in some areas, largely in response to concerns about immediate local impacts. The larger community sentiment of support should be highlighted to advance policies and developments deemed to be in the larger public good. ISSUES • The community's infrastructure continues to age and be stressed by increasing traffic volume. • The majority of Edina's employed population works outside of the City and is therefore reliant on the connectivity and maintenance of the roadway system for their livelihood. • The community overall is highly supportive of increased diversity and integration of transportation and local access options, but has a lesser appetite for a transit -forward strategy. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • Undertake community education and promotion, to highlight the broad support and benefits of more diverse transport options, and particularly to highlight the support expressed across multiple age demographics. • Continue to work actively with Metro Transit to expand transit options to Edina, and ensure that Edina residents do not become further isolated from the larger transit infrastructure. • Continue to develop an integrated long-term plan that lays out a future orientated and ambitious transport network that covers multiple modes of transport and takes into account potential impacts of future technology on transport modes and corridors. • Continue to promote and develop the sidewalk, trail and bike lane networks to improve accessibility and connectivity throughout the City, and beyond. Vision Edina — DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework — January 2015 3. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT MIX Edina has traditionally embraced commercial development along a relatively narrow corridor along France Avenue, and originally anchored by Southdale Mall. While this practice has been successful and has led to additional growth along France Avenue and elsewhere, Vision Edina participants have expressed a desire for easier and more proximal access to small retail options and other amenities. Many participants of the engagement process highlighted the unique and appealing experience of the 50th and France precinct. New development opportunities can build upon this example to develop neighborhood nodes of an appropriate scale, in other locations across the City. ISSUES Edina has historically favored large-scale commercial development. Best practice and community desire has moved towards also including smaller -scale models. Some residents currently feel somewhat disconnected from common amenities, including banking, dry cleaning, groceries, and pharmacies - and this is an issue likely to be exacerbated with an aging population. • The community has a significant once -off redevelopment opportunity in Pentagon Park and other areas key areas, but as of yet, there appears to be no clear community consensus as to the best and most appropriate uses and ultimate outcome. • In light of the escalating developmental pressures facing the Council and City, the City should as a priority renew its broader land use plan. This plan should examine and consider the future broad fabric of the community, and begin to define key nodes of higher density mixed use, and potential nodes of small-scale commercial opportunity, embedded in more of a neighborhood context. • More consideration of scale and appropriate mixed use could be used in the review of new commercial development proposals, especially to take into account the compounding impact of numerous developments in close proximity, and the concerns about this overall impact on streetscape, environmental aspects, transportation and utilities and services. • The community should further examine and consider the viability of developing small neighborhood - based business nodes, to provide a range of local amenities and services. • Edina should continue to explore strategies that promote the continued vitality of existing core retail zones around Southdale Mall, and also actively pursue economic development strategies targeting specific professional services clusters. These approaches could enhance the core economic underpinning of the local economy. Vision Edina — DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework — Janw 2015 4. LIVE AND WDRK Edina's community has a large number of high wage earners, most of who commute to areas outside the city for work. Therefore, Edina is highly dependent on the vitality of the regional economy to maintain prosperity. At the same time, the community also recognizes a growing desire, especially among young professionals to both live and work in the same location. There is evidence to suggest this represents part of a larger societal trend, and could have important implications to the future location appeal of Edina. The City currently offers limited opportunities to do so, as a mismatch exists between the wage-earning potential of many of the employment opportunities in the community and the relatively high cost of quality housing. However, the City is very well endowed with recreation facilities, which offers excellent outdoor and sporting amenities. ISSUES • Many of the city's residents commute outside of the city for work. This creates a disincentive to young professionals who may aspire to live and work in Edina. • The community does not possess significant spaces for collaborating, start-ups or telecommuting. • Many key staff in organizations across Edina cannot afford to live in the community, creating a potential service disconnect. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • Edina should support the development of a start-up or entrepreneurial climate in the city, and bring together key stakeholders to develop an integrated economic development strategy. • The community should consider the inclusion of incubators or co -working spaces in any new redevelopment projects and in mixed-use proposals. • The City should promote the development of a mix of commercial amenities, including restaurants and cultural amenities, which are attractive to young families and professionals and can further act as connection points or hubs within the fabric of neighborhoods and development areas. 10 Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2015 S. EDUCATIONAL FOCUS Edina Public Schools are recognized as one of the principal assets of the community. The school district and its institutions are routinely recognized as among the best in the state and nation. Participants in the Vision Edina process routinely singled out quality education as one of the defining characteristics of their preferred future. However, respondents also expressed a desire for the greater use of technology in the classroom, expansion of cultural and 'globally -focused' learning opportunities, and the promotion of lifelong learning. ISSUES • Education policy and funding are largely the responsibility of other entities, placing the City in an advocacy and partnership role. • Respondents desire an educational system that maintains high quality while also embracing new techniques and technologies. • While Edina Public Schools and other local institutions adeptly provide K-12 education, the community is largely responsible for providing lifelong learning and other cultural education opportunities. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • The community should promote a culture of learning among all of its residents, and continue to find ways to explore, understand and present best practice across a range of topics. In particular, it is important to expand the scope beyond regional expertise and explore best practice and emerging trends on a global scale. • The City should continue to foster their productive working partnership with Edina Public Schools. These two entities represent some of the key leverage points in the City, and combining their influence could accelerate the progress on key initiatives. • The City and school district should continue to explore future opportunities for expanded partnerships between the school and existing employment opportunities within the city, thereby helping develop career paths and local workforce development. Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2015 11 6. POPULATION MIX The demographics of the Twin Cities are constantly changing as new residents are attracted by strong regional employment prospects, economic tailwinds and quality cultural and public amenities. Edina is well positioned to attract many of these new residents because of its high quality of life. Edina's population is also undergoing a generational transformation as its population continues to age, creating a new group of active retirement senior citizens with different housing and amenity needs. Developing an effective balance in each of these areas is critical to ensuring future sustainable growth. ISSUES • The perception of an 'Edina Bubble' carries with it the stigma of being an exclusive and exclusionary community. • The relatively high cost of housing is also viewed as a perceived barrier to entry into the community, especially for younger families. • The needs of an aging population are often in conflict with the preferences of the younger residents the community seeks to attract. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • Edina Public Schools should continue to expose students, and parents, to a variety of cultural experiences. This will serve to foster a global mindset, while also cementing the education system as a key population draw. • Edina's civic organizations should promote a welcoming image of the city. These efforts should be equally directed towards new residents and new businesses. These organizations should also take a lead role in publicizing the City's cultural amenities. • The City should continue to prioritize amenities that meet the needs of residents of all ages. The City should continue discussions about the effects of an aging population, as referenced in the Vision 20/20 process. Similar efforts should be used to engage young adults, including high school students. 12 Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2016 7. ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP There is a growing awareness of the impact that the built environment has on the natural environment, and the individual and collective responsibility we all have towards good environmental stewardship. Community residents and stakeholders believe that Edina can take an active and ambitious internal and regional leadership role in promoting more comprehensive recycling, smart building, and energy efficiency practices. These themes couple well with the parallel benefits in smarter urban planning, increased transportation options, and application of technology. ISSUES • Residential and commercial developers have little incentive to balance environmentally friendly building practices with market pressures, or in fact to provide leading edge examples of energy efficient and environmentally sensitive construction. • Currently, residential waste removal and other environmental services are poorly coordinated, and in some cases resulting in multiple providers serving the same streets, contributing to noise, environmental impact and inefficiencies. • The need for green spaces is well recognized, but the use of these areas currently follows more traditional 'green lawn' approaches rather than integrated habitat zones. • Developmental pressures are likely to continue to place increased demands on the City's infrastructure and contribute to concerns about decline in environmental quality in the city. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • Develop a comprehensive citywide environmental management plan, that explores and includes best practice in terms of water management, biodiversity, green space management, street scape preservation and waste management. • Partner with energy and utility service providers to educate residents on the importance of energy efficiency in their daily living, and promote energy efficiency and smart building practices at all City - owned properties. This could include well established practices such as publishing data on the carbon emission, waste levels and recycling levels. • Identify a series of environmental flagship pilot projects to bring stakeholders together and begin exploring creative solutions. Examples could include: waste collection and management across the city; recycling and green waste management; environmental overlays on development projects such as Pentagon Park; and, utilization of available areas such as Fred Richards Park as community gardens and biodiversity spaces. • Develop incentives for individual households to take an active part in the overall city responsibility to environmental management, including reducing nutrient loads in run-off, local recycling and efficient resource usage. Vision Edina — DRAFT Strategic vision Framework — January 2016 13 8. REGIONAL LEADERSHIP Edina has long been recognized as one of the premier communities in the Twin Cities. It has also historically assumed a leadership role as it served as the home to many influential individuals. The City has also been historically viewed as somewhat progressive in its policies and practices. Recently, this reputation has somewhat faded as other neighboring communities have jumped to the fore, and Edina has approached a 'fully built out' phase. The existing phase of redevelopment, and the expanding pressures from the surrounding metropolis offer the need and opportunity for Edina to once again emerge as an innovator, seeking and implementing creative solutions to local and regional issues. ISSUES • City leadership has generally focused on local issues, in large part driven by community needs and expectations and the trend towards conservatism that comes with an aging population. • The city's size limits its relative influence when compared to larger neighboring communities. This fully built nature constrains the city to internal redevelopment and forces it to deal with new issues, previously not encountered. • The community has regional economic Importance, but its cultural importance has been somewhat more limited. However, there is potential for Edina to have some destination value, beyond just as a residential abode. STRATEGIC ACTIONS • City leaders should actively advocate for Edina's interests in the Metropolitan Council and other regional bodies. In addition, the City should form particularly close functional connections with the immediately neighboring cities, as they share many aspects and challenges. • City leaders should continue to inform residents on the impact of issues of regional importance, and work to better integrate an understanding of the importance of being an active participant, and leader, in the larger regional system • City leaders and residents should collaborate to discover, develop and apply new best practices in environmental sustainability, aging in place, educational quality, and other broad areas of consensus. These efforts will ensure that Edina builds the future intelligence capacity to retain a future -focused woridview, and act as an example and role model to other cities in North America. 14 Vision Edina - DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework - January 2015 CONCLUSION The Vision Edina process has presented an opportunity for the community to come together and explore the longer-term future. The current period of intense redevelopment, which is occurring within Edina, represents an important juncture in the community's history and evolution. This is coupled with a more gradual generational shift, as the predominant Baby Boom generation moves through the demographic tiers. The resultant situation is where Edina stands poised before some significant choices about future trajectory and outcomes. This has been well articulated in the Vision Edina process. The community has chosen a path forward that represents some significant change and reinvention, but without losing touch with the important family values and rationale that has always defined Edina as a community. The path ahead is not without its challenges and will require careful balancing of differing priorities, aspirations and desires. The collective decision making process required to move forward will set Edina apart as an intelligent, engaged, thoughtful and forward looking city. It will require maturity and patience on behalf of the citizens and leadership, and recognition that the complex resident mix, which makes Edina interesting, also brings with it differing opinions and perspectives. Understanding the importance of the common good over personal self -interests will be critical to build alignment around important future shaping decisions and actions. The population and leadership of Edina possess and exhibit more than sufficient knowledge and experience to guide the City toward the vibrant and balanced future desired by the residents and stakeholders. Vision Edina — DRAFT Strategic Vision Framework — January 2016 15 FOR MORE INFORMATION VISION EDINA The Vision Edina initiative has aimed to define a shared vision for the City of Edina. The vision and strategic framework is an outcome of a broad-based and inclusive community visioning process. The engagement portion of this important planning process ran from Septemberto December 2014, and gathered significant community input. From a strategic planning perspective, Vision Edina examines the issues that have been identified as having the highest priority within the community. The initiative examined future trends in cities across North America and the world, and how generational values are changing. This was also linked to local aspirations, values and desires for the future. This process enables a clearer understanding of what people might be looking for in Edina in 2030 and beyond. Vision Edina has represented an opportunity for all residents to have a say and contribute to creating the shared future vision. Vision Edina is part of the overall community process to update the long-term vision for the City of Edina, and will also serve as an important foundation for other strategic efforts, such as the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Plans. The City of Edina partnered with Future iQ Partners, an international consultancy company, to design and facilitate the process. For more information on the Vision Edina project and the City of Edina, please contact: OANA,,yl Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager - City of Edina 1�c Tel: + 1 952-826-0415 F� _ ay KKurt@EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov oY( e VISION futures iQ .�\ �� EDINA PARTNERS Residents Jobs Households Cooling Degree Days 859 774 Electricity(MWh) Re". 1,238 Com/Int 209,821 Tota Heating Degree Days 208,120 Therms Ra 417,860 Com/Im 16,523 Tota Total Energy (MMBtu) Re, 627,681 Com/Inc 21,522,121 Tota Res. Energy(kBtu/household/day) 696,713 Com/Ind Energy(kBtu/job/day) 109,705,444 Total Energy(kBtu/person/day) 109,961,823 it Precipitation (inches) Potable Water (gallons) Re'. Com/In( Tota Res. Water(gal./household/day) Com/Ind Water (gal./job/day) Total Water(gal./person/day) I Vehicle Miles Traveled Travel (VMT/person/day) e (pounds) Recycled Combusted Landfill Tota Waste(pounds/person/day) nal of primary Sources Greenhouse Gas dons (core tonnes)a Energy VMT Waste Tota Regional Indicators Initiative Project: City of Edina Updated 10/14/2014 2007 2006 2009 2010 47 2011 2012 2013 1,181 859 774 48,521,191 1,129 1,238 1,077 209,821 199,920 195,762 P.WkO.,777 208,120 209,867 205,792 417,860 406,644 391,709 16,523 393,159 399,384 390,921 627,681 608,564 (87,471 21,522,121 801,279 605,251 696,713 7,336 8,264 7,778 7,170 7,357. ,6,390 8,196 17,843,976 20,511,175 19,953,060 18,209,218 19,152,383 15,339,689 20,189,644 16,448,884 18, 249,768 17,815,739 16,804,837 17,804,060 15, 229,325 18,468,138 34,292,860 38,760,141 57,768,799 35,014,055 36,956,443 511,569,014 58,657,792 510,657,995 508,113,244 ® 488,974,345 496,713,!00 533,476,106 556,953 558,505 48,521,191 46,939,228 47,522,380 48,566,927 49,475,041 aJI49,256,803 40,161,825 36,329,293 29,290,883 33,186,277 37,397,730 38,964,661 16,523 30,225,460 30,065,648 34,482,909 28,996,787 24,787,419 21,522,121 807,604 119,644,088 114,916,132 110,713,020 109,705,444 110,752,075 109,961,823 556,953 558,505 523,555 501,795 518,788 459,180 495,415 234,128 224,377 223,713 220,778 219,343 225,869 219,427 16,523 14,338 12,073 9,679 10,038 9,835 9,912 807,604 797,220 759,340 732,252 748,169 694,884 724,753 CO,e (tonnes/person/year) 81,597,544 75,542,436 Greenhouse Gas Emissions tonnes)° CO2e (tonnes/person/year) Total 868,419 151,!51 77,132,679 97,729,798 95,652,760 Costs (S)' Energy Water VMT Waste tet($/person/year) Total 84,258,876 90,501,207 551,596 517,834 80,640,301 92,398,021 10,593,970 9,892,334 193,325,728 193,309,395 78,401,924 81,597,544 75,542,436 449,582 584,419 662,510 77,132,679 97,729,798 95,652,760 9,052,798 9,045,469 9,197,578 165,036,982 188,957,230 L3,OSS,284 35 Regional Indicators Initiative Project: City of Edina Updated 10/14/2014 Keyed Nota on Sources: 1. Resident and household data from the Minnesota Department of Administration. http://www.demography.state.mn.us/resource.html?ld=19243; lob data from North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and the Quarterly Census of Employment Wages (QCEW), http://www.positivelyminnesota.com/apps/imi/gcew/ResufsDisp.aspx 2. land area (first cell to right) from U.S. Census Bureau, 2010, http://quidtfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/27000.htmi 3. Sum of total energy consumed in city. Source: Xcel Energy for electricity and CenterPoird Energy for natural gas. 4. Heating and Coding Degree Days from Degree Days.net, Station ID: KMSP, http://www.degreedays.net S. Precipitation from Minnesota Climatology Working Group, State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Zip code: 55436. http://climate.umn.edu/wetland/wetland.a,p. Potable water data from Minnesota DNR Ecological and Water Resources - Public Water Supply Inventory. 6. Vehicle miles traveled from Minnesota Department of Transportation, http://www.dot.state.mn.us/roadway/data/data-pr.ducts.html#VMT. 7. Per -capita amounts by waste management method for the county are used to estimate per -capita amounts for the city. Waste amounts from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency SCORE reports (http://www.pu.state.mn.us/Index.php/data/score/recydingond-solid-waste-data.htmi) and county Waste Certification reports. Waste composition from: Final Report Statewide MSW Composition Study, AStudy of Discords in the State of Minnesota, Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, March 2000. 8. Subtotal of Primary Sources include greenhouse gas emissions from energy consumption, vehicle miles traveled, and solid waste management in units of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). Primary sources for these estimates are as follows: a) CO2 emission factors for electricity and natural gas from the utility companies. Emission factors for other greenhouse gases from the International Local Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis protocol, Version 1.1, May 2010, produced by the United Nations, ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability and The Climate Registry. b) Calculation of emissions from vehicle miles traveled (VMT) involve four primary data sources and calculations that include VMT, national vehicle fleet mix, average fuel economy statistics, and Minnesota fuel characteristics. Data sources include the federal and State departments of transportation, the USEPA, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Clean Air Climate Protection (CACP) software, 2009, developed by ICLEI--Local Governments for Sustainability, and the City of Minneapolis Greenhouse Gas Inventories: AGeographic Inventory, City of Minneapolis, 5/11/12. c) Calculations of solid waste emissions from landfilling are based on the waste -In-place estimates from the Clean Air Climate Protection (CACP) software, 2009, developed by ICLEI—Local Governments for Sustainability. d) Calculations of emissions from the combustion of solid waste are from the City of Minneapolis Greenhouse Gas Inventories: AGeogrophic Inventory, City of Minneapolis, 5/11/12. 9. In order to comply with the reporting requirements of the US. ICLEI Community Protocol for Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, October 2012, "Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions" also include the city's share of emissions from the Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (MSP) and from the Metro Wastewater Treatment Plant. MSP Airport emissions are from: Greenhouse Gas Report., Metropolitan Airports Commission, December 2010. http://www.mspairport.com/docs/about-msp/sustainability/MSP-2010-GHG-Report-Jan-2031.aspx. The city's share of MSP emissions are from the Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities. Source for the city's share of wastewater treatment emissions is the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. 10. Total costs include costs associated with the retail cost of delivered energy; the fuel costs for vehicle miles traveled; statewide average costs of solid waste management for combustion (incineration and RDF processing), recycling, and landfilling; and electricity and natural gas costs of producing and distributing potable water. Primary sources not already listed above Include the following: a) Energy costs (electricity, natural gas, fuel dl, coal): Xcel Energy; the US Energy Information Administration, http://www.ela.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_dcu_smr_a.htm; and State Electricity Profiles 2030, January 2012, U.S. Energy Information Administration, http://www.ela.gov/electricity/state/pdf/sep2030.pdf; "Residual Fuel Oil Prices by Sales Type" Source: US Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/PET_PRI_RESID_DCU_R20_M.htm. Prices for sub -bituminous coal from "Table 7.9 Coal Prices, 1949-2011." Source: US Energy Information Administration: http://www.eia.gov/coal/data.dm#prim b) Vehicle miles traveled. costs: Total fuel costs are derived In Table 4b In the Conversion Factors spreadsheet. Primary sources: Weekly Retail Gasoline and Diesel Prices, Minnesota (all grades). Source: US Energy Information Agency, http://www.ela.gm/dnav/pet/pet_pri_gnd_dcus_smp_a.htm; Clean Cities Alternative Fuel Price Report, US Department of Energy, http://www.sfdc.energy.gov/publications/search/keyword/?q-alternative%20fuel%20price%20report; Midwest g2 Diesel Retail Prices: Source: US Energy Information Agency, http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/Leaf Handlw.ashx?n=pet&s=emd_eo2d_pte_r20_dpg&f=a c) Solid waste management costs: Source: "2008 Payments and Spending for Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) In Minnesota," Sig Scheurle, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency d) Potable water costs: Energy consumption rate per gallon Is based on the collective experience of numerous US cities as reported in the Climate and Air Pollution Planning Assistant, by ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability USA, "Low maintenance landscaping" model. Cost per gallon based on the statewide average, commercial/industrial electricity rate (cited above). 11. In September 2012, it was learned that Xcel Energy had Instituted a new policy called the "15/15 Rule." The new rule applies when there are fewer than 15 premises (customers) in a particular service class (i.e. Windsource customers) or R the usage for any one particular customer Is more than 15% of the total service class. M order to protect the data privacy of those customers, that data Is excluded. Using the 5-Kne reporting format, this rule applied to the premise count and consumption data for Commercial and Industrial Windsource customers In the City. The extent of the excluded data and for which years the rule was applied is not known. In 2014, Xcel developed a 2 -line reporting format that limits the amount of excluded data by combining windsource and non-windsource customers and Including public lighting in the "Business" customer group rather than as a separate category. This reporting format resulted in no data being excluded as a result of 15/15. The energy data for all years was revised in October 2014 to show this more complete data. Additionally, this data update corrected a 2012 data Inaccuracy. 36 N .On�•x�� �O PPR O � � v40�0 „ � M� *Elly «x y v�4 E « « « _� ��n irk -� d •• ® ^^ ? n r � �� ifi777 M pry ♦♦ ♦ pp, �pO .p Y■■ R M T t ® � M _ fpY� h T V! Y. ■ (O� $M N f9Ni!. c o f Q� cr f G Hill 3.1. .1 t- u1111 ffVV� t g+lj M X o O N I �VY O NHHy HHN HNH H H N H NN N NHH N N HNy HN H H Oq H, p yp H H NHN N � H NH M yN p H N N N H N y y E NNHHHNN �`�R�<�p� NNH N a H N � N ffi NN ;� N HNN ���♦gip N N � NNy g � : �� xx �U +R S �� E � �� 8=eta=iv° nq P i N � �ID ♦F�� —Vn �y4$j s{ ¢ � � Y��« �• M _�vyN�i.1= � M 1~fi � je r� 2 � • � �o0.�7nx $' � � w�. i NNNHHNHN NHN N H N N NN H NNN N N HNy � � �� . O N N IO < Q M O 9 V f� H a i■■� O TN O O JU � � � � ���� 8U E Gyq ]� � �■! E �a� �R9h gR �� � p E� a gaVz _ M " Sector Shares of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Airport Share, Solid Waste, City Share of 47,958,6% 9,679,1% Wastewater Sector Share Of Treatment, sox 47% GHG, Energy, & Costs, 474,1% 45% 2010 Emissions (tonnes) 40% X —Total 14 is Percent of Total GHG Energy 35% S2 'W Residential —Commercial/ 23% n Percent of Total MMEtn 30% — 8 y. ■ Percent of Total Costs 25% —VMT Foeis 51,500 20% x —Transp. (incl 15% - airport) 10% 2 Management SSL —Water k astewaterEnergy E 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112012 2013 Sector Share of Greenhouse Electricity Natural Gas vebra Gas Emissions, 2010 (tonnes) Traveled 20 Per -Capita i I 18 Greenhouse Gas 16 53,500 Emissions (tonnes) � —Total 14 53,000 Energy 12 S2 'W Residential —Commercial/ 10 ------- — 8 —Commercial/ Ind. 6 —VMT Foeis 51,500 i —Transp. (incl 4 - airport) 5500 2 Management —Send Waste —Water k astewaterEnergy E 2007 2008 2009 2010 20112012 2013 250 Per -Capita j Energy (MMBtu) 200 Total I 150 Residential 100—Commereial/lad. —vehicle Miles .., „ „ H Traveled 2007 2006 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 39 Per -Capita Costs i I 54,000 —Total .400 53,500 Residential 53,000 Energy S2 'W —Commercial/ �j Ind. Energy 52,000 —VMT Foeis 51,500 i 51,000 —Slid Waste 5500 i Management —Water k astewaterEnergy E 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 39 ZmrV Cmnmpdm tbd An6cimW Gnatlwre Ga L Updated: 925/14 swftn Md ItImb '7017 Atunamt CHC 3126. Amit" ONG 2269 Asawt GNC OW G»e+li>ata Gn S26Wi2tr 4 201: 2101 Amommt GRG Aautid - G11G 2692 AM1mM GHG nwokity (MW►)' Raidoaeial 2,229 0 3,013 0 2,927 0 2925 0 2,1177 0 2,875 0 206,992 122,026 196,907 112,667 192,1135 104,195.25 201,294 103,427 205,243 101,229 206,992 99,359 SubtuW 209,821 122,026 199,920 112,667 1",762 104,195 2(26,219 103,427 206,120 108,229 209,867 99,359 Ce�e,sial and ladutaiat Wind' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 417,860 246,337 406,644 232,675 391,709 211,653.56 4011,551 205,911 393,159 207,321 399,394 191,710 Srbleetl 417,060 246,337 466,644 232,675 391,709 211,654 400,55% 205,811 393,159 207,321 399,394 191,710 Ebdrieky totule 627,0111 381,163 26604 343,343 517A71 315126 684,777 3101239 661,279 313,350 610,251 291AP Nwua2ad far embar' 570112 334110 51702 334/269 SUA86 313,786 538,224 31SAM 551,217 210,277 549,5(1 361,162 Na (IYars)' Reaidcrmialw 17,943,976 98,131 20,511,175 112,799 19,953,060 109,730 1t,209,216 100,140 19152,383 105,327 15,339,629 64,359 CommeroW and hrdustrial 16,448,824 90,459 12,249,761 100.363 17,215.739 97.976 16,604.237 92.417 17,604,060 97,912 15,229,325 83,752 Natural ps totak 34492,866 126,598 1(,766,%43 213,162 37,7611,799 1 207,786 35AI4455 192,556 36,956,443 2034" 30,569,614 16(,111 Norua6ed for weather 3 35305341.77 193AN 364194,261 1",047 36,999,632 2OA76 36,615,614 201,365 37,(3 AN 201,167 33,123,271 193,157 Total rJorry (MMIDIN) 070,934 35L,953 5,945,"1 55('1116 5,721,331 323¢33 5,3%4,903 561,793 5,747,2111 512,726 5,135,6%6 4".126 Itaident; I 2,386,367 220,137 2,733,145 225,466 2,366.3,286 213,925 2,517,717 203,5%7 2A2S,3" 213'M 2,2.4,0.13 1(3,718 715,909 122,026 682,127 112,667 667,940 104,195 696,795 103,427 710,105 102,229 716,066 99,359 Natual 1,724,3941 99,131 2,051.119 112.799 1,995306 109.730 1,820.922 100.140 1,915,232 103,327 1,533,969 94,359 Commercial and b dmuw 3,67W7 336,796 3,212,446 3)31.11( 3,119,626 3WA" 3147,126 298,223 3,121165 3116,132 23125,631 275,-2 FJeca+civ 1,425,732 246,337 1,3117,469 232,675 1,336,511 211,654 1366,704 203,111 1,341,459 207,321 1,362,691 191,710 Nabi 1,644,629 90,459 1,224,977 10D,363 1,781.514 97.976 1,680,494 92.417 1,780,406 97,912 1,522,933 23,752 Total WeaNm�NarmJ4d SAW" 5291597 5123,210 533,736 5,696118 517,191 51%6,226 4861M 5,6%6121 497,44 5,267,497 49.4,719 Readertal 2112,925 211,713 2576,26% 214,312 2,61(,891 210,904 2547,/p 2M 117 2,612,%%3 267,101 2,426,439 186533 Fbmxity 651,047 110,9" 661,094 109,191 663,409 103,499 643,159 95,466 650,962 99,2111 645,935 29,62E Natural ps 1,131,978 100,742 1,915,303 105,330 1,954,671 107,495 1,904,222 104,721 1,961,681 107,861 1,762,504 96,927 Coal I* , and bduaaW 2,965,221 316123 3*aiw 319,215 3,41,739 361199 31211160 286413 3,361,30 296.310 2179,M8 269,1" Eleemcity 1,296,565 224,019 1,344,666 225,497 1,327,446 210,21E 1,261,5001 189,969 1,229,769 190,059 1,229,235 172,934 Normal Som 1,US,656 92,166 1,704,136 93,717 1,745,292 95,991 1,757,359 %,644 1,823,579 100,2116 1,749,923 96,230 Total GHG far electricity, natural pa, and fuel oR 556,933 339,125 323555 501,793 512,726 439,126 Total GHG fur electricity mei mate l ps, ■ommilmed for weather 522397 333,736 517,1(2 46,266 26'1,144 455,719 Other factors: NSP Mrresoa GHG amwnm rotes ("noes GIiG/MK7r) 0.590 0.572 0.540 0.514 0.527 0.420 Ytion 47,090 43,169 49,491 47,941 49,262 42,929 P a rhes: Electricity 13.3 7.9 12.6 7.2 11.9 6.4 12.6 6.5 12.5 6.5 12.5 6.0 Natural Sm 7222 4.0 604.7 4.4 763.1 42 730.4 40 765.7 42 626.0 3.4 TaW OM hra mail mesal 11.9 11.6 10.6 10.5 10.7 9.4 Total OM fir cledri:05 rad amrd pa. 11.2 nonubmad br water N4Mc I Source: Xo d EmcW for ebcmidey and Ccokdlc nt EwW for sural go 11.1 10.5 _ 10.2 10.3 9.3 2 The wid ts+binas dna are wed for Xcel Ewm3ps "Wirdaamee ppm are sealed as separate asmoe. They are eel Part eldm n guhr eysxa auppiy ad drey ab rro4 c»nat toward Xeel Eeegy's (rpt oder Mirrosaa's mwwabk anew sadards. 3 Ne wW-d SamdW Hemang Coe%e0 Dopm: Deis predios 0e aet2y m m p6a basad as the swap HDD/CDD. act &a aerW mama. For ekeaialy. R is a1 '25% ps, it's assumed W% a for hcmft boldigs. ofelectricity toaamupYm is for am saui ' i0. For rmrrat 4 Electricity a MW natural Sat in ihomms. Cobra diadde equivalmaim (COB) as expressed w movie mom, which 1,000 kilognimm 2,204.6 lmandt, or 1.102 US tams. 40 Xcel Energy Data Updated: 10/13/2014 Source: Xcel E • Eketrie Enew Xed Kwrws Year Clan of Sanroke Electric Only Tetxl Eiersy Generated by Wind Mlanesrdt Ekctrk )P�r Cont Cemt ed (MWh) ladolisn Fi►etor (US (MWk) tm CO2/MWk) 2007 Residential 20,944 209,821 2,829 Commercial & Industrial 2,370 417,860 Total 23,314 627,681 2,829 0.645 2008 Residential 21,046 199,920 3,013 Commercial & Industrial 2,328 406,644 Total 23,374 6",564 ` 3,013 0.626 2069 Residential 21,223 195,762 2,927 Commercial & Industrial 2,306 391,709 Total 23,529 587,471 2,927 0.591 2010 Residential 21,232 204,219 2,925 Commercial & Industrial 2,335 400,558 Total 23,567 - 604,777 2,135 ` 0.562, 2011 lResidentied 21,241 205,243 2,877 Commercial & Industrial 1 2,34E 1 393,159 Total' 23.09 598,402 2,877 OS77 2012 Residential 21,251 205,539 2,875 Commercial & Industrial 2,388 399,384 - Total 23,639 605,223 2,075 0.525 2013 Residential 21,255 205,792 2,869 Commercial & Industrial 2,384 390,921 Total 23,639 S96,713' 2,869 OM1 Notes: • In sepu miser to t z, n was mrnoo mat xcet anergy ruts instinna anew poncy cattea me -- i w a Kan.- t ne new tuu appites wnen mere are rewer man 13 premises (customers) in a particular service class (i.e. Windsource customers) or if the ttaage for any one particular metamer is more than 15% of the total service class. In order to protect the data privacy of those customers, that data is excluded. Using the 5 -line reporting format, this rule applied to the premise count and consumption data for Commercial and Industrial Windsource customers in the City. The extent of the excluded data and for which years the rule was applied is not known. In 2014, Xcel developed a 24ine reporting format that limits the amount of excluded data by combining windsource and non-windsource customers and including public lighting in the "Business" customer group rather than as a separate category. This reporting format resulted in no data being excluded as a result of 15/15. The energy data for all years was revised in October 2014 to show this more complete data. Additionally, this data update corrected a 2012 mato inwrlvrry Notes from Xcel Energy) - 41 Xcel EnwU Data updated: 10/13/2014 Sauce: Xcel Energy* 1. An Xcel Energy 'customer' may receive electric, gas or both electric and gas service at a given location. To provide the clearest breakout of customers, this information has been prepared using a'premise' as a proxy for a customer. A premise is a physical location where electricity, gas or both may be supplied. Typically there is only one meter for electricity and/or one for gas at each location. 2. Only premises showing energy consumption during the reporting period are included. 3. The reports include retail energy consumed within the specified local government boundary. Consumption, including streetlights, traffic signals and other non -metered premises, by all types of government is incorporated. Also included is the use of energy by the Company, excluding only the gas to fuel power plants (which is accounted for in the electric emission factor) and gas to fuel the compressors on the gas pipeline system. 4. Premises are assigned to a class of service based on the electric and gas rates used at the premise. If a premise has more than one class of service, the service with the highest priority is assigned. Priorities are: Residential; Residential Windsource; Commercial and Industrial; Commercial and Industrial Windsource; and Public Street and Highway Lighting. 5. Windsource is a voluntary wind energy program offered by Xcel Energy to its electric customers. Customers have the option of purchasing 100 - kilowatt- hour (kWh) blocks of Windsource or the 100% Windsource option. (1000 kWh equals one Megawatt -hour or MWh). For Windsource rows, 'Total Electric Energy Consumed (MWh)' column includes all energy consumed by Windsource premises whether from renewable Windsource generation or from traditional non-renewable sources. 6. Windsource energy is included in the calculation of Xcel Energy's Electric Emission Factor. The total emissions for the community, or'Total Tons of CO2 From CONS' column, is calculated with Windsource emissions assigned a zero emissions factor. This may not reflect current or future carbon reporting protocols or the Company's position on them; check your carbon reporting protocols to determine how green pricing programs are handled. 7. By definition, commercial electric service is delivered at secondary voltage (typically 120, 208, 240 or 480 volts). Industrial electric service is delivered at primary voltage (typically 13 Kilovolts) or transmission voltage (typically 115 or 230 Kilovolts). 8. Apartment buildings often have individual electric meters for each unit, which are served on a residential rate and are included in the electric Residential class of service. They usually have another electric meter for laundry rooms and for common area lighting and cooling, served on a commercial electric rate and included in the Commercial class. These same apartment buildings often have one gas meter connected to a boiler and a water heater providing heat and hot water to all of the individual units. These meters are served on a commercial gas rate and are included in the gas Commercial class. However, if each unit has an individual gas meter serving only that unit's individual furnace and/or water heater, then it is served on a residential gas rate and included in the gas Residential class. 9. For gas transportation customers, where gas is purchased from a third party supplier and Xcel Energy only delivers the gas to the end customer, premises and consumption are included in the gas Commercial class of service rows. 10. Gas transportation customers are set up by contract rather than as traditional premises. The 12 -month median of the number of gas transportation service and facilities charges paid in the jurisdiction is used as a proxy. 11. No premise counts are provided for Public Street and Highway Lighting since these are set up by contract rather than as traditional premises. 12. If a premise count was impacted by 15/15 there is an asterisk * in the column next to the premise count. This report was prepared by Business Systems, Business Intelligence. Consumption data is from Xcel Energy's internal database. 42 Natural Gas Usage Source: CenterPoint Energy Fiscal year: 2007 Total therms , Residential Service Gas 17,843,976 Commercial/Industrial Gas 16,448,884 Total 34,292,860 Fiscal year: 2008 Total therms Residential Service Gas 20,511,175 Commercial/Industrial Gas 18,249,768 Total 38,760,943 Fiscal Year: 2009 Total therms Residential Service Gas 19,953,060 Commercial/Industrial Gas 17,815,739 Total 37,768,799 Fiscal Year: 2010 Total therms Residential Service Gas 18,209,218 Commercial/Industrial Gas 16,804,837 Total 35,014,055 Fiscal Year: 2011 Total `therms Residential Service Gas 19,152,383 Commercial/Industrial Gas 17,804,060 Total 36,956,443 Fiscal Year: 2012 Total therms Residential Service Gas 15,339,689 Commercial/Industrial Gas 15,229,325 43 Cowreniea Fatten Updated 9/25/11 2M7 JOIN 2119:' Titan It Ciwr.br Anion for VlfM. LGM Gk"V-eba. GM fi r .. ��� GM am GbW Ld.IM. �Yr�il�: per..,.: POM" PWM"Items.n1=rd - OWN" Flown" IS" ml /A1C frill f.4i►Y Wa■aYL � @tG LIIwYm 9,6 1MYrs PIMMIN L .1fad CO,(bsm"), 1,29(1.0 1 1,290 1,252.0 1 1,252 1,1920 1 1,1920 1,124.0 1 1,124.0 1,154.0 I 1.154.0 _ N20 (Rom), 0.02919 310 90 (102949 310 tint 0.02779 310 8.6 0.02629 I10 6.1 0.02559 310 7.9 CH40,/MWhj'' 0.02197 21 0.6 0.02199 21 0.6 0.02890 21 0.6 0.02653 21 0.6 0.02945 21 0.6 Taal Ccr, 1,299.7 1,261.4 1,191.2 1,132.7 1,162.5 Tadd CO2, a 9..199 9.672 930 9514 9_S2'/ N.rri G.a a CO,,(ktlh.wt) 5.302 1 51 5.302 I 53 5.302 I 5.3 S.J02 I S.J 5_H12 1 5.3 NIO(k`ikvw) 0.00042 310 0.1 0.00042 310 0.1 0.00012 310 0.1 0.00012 310 0.1 0.00042 310 0.1 (k 21 0.1 CH."Ahee) 0.00320 21 0.1 0.00320 21 0.1 0.WJ20 0.00320 21 0.1 &OD320 21 0.1 T.W COA tk vvsna) 5.5 55 5.5 55 55 Trio ) fkMw 9.916 am GAN ams I lfod E--aa.rim fle=e for CO, is for Xrd'e Molh �' g.-*.* -P••7• NSP Mieeew. 2 Xed Envty arris;on fatlore for CH4 and N20.rc Iran ds USEPA sGRID f Midwest Rm-4 Org-,mstm Wm. Fadors do rot "wtts a snsssieme Iran trmerststrn .rd dishi6Wion loess. Data wmlebl. for 2007, 2(X)9, .d 2010', d- yeas - e.h.Mcd using s It,- ra'gresatm. S-: �://avtvw.tl..gav/claxtorcrty/®erpy- teaomoesle"riNhdcx.hiod. ' 3 Calla dxrede eq.vslees ((:OC) are expressed in -tric tonnes, cchich equal 1,000 kilograms, or 2,204.6 pounds. 4 Save: Table O.1 sad 03. Iwral t3avm.rwr. Glwatian Permed, frc 16e Quwtifiulioe sod RapM.t d Ornallroaae Oe Farissio.s Invreuia, V.rsinn 1. 1, Msy 2010. Ths d.- (s)nMl N.) is s uM d kat coaly sgrl b 100,0(K) British tb wW writs (BTU). It is app-mr ody ds maty egrvolml d Mum" 100 wDic Ess (o11m trdanad b e I M) d.=.sl gas. A evSian BTUs 1h4s�r) egwls a dmsslMr (10 tlimus) NataW ter a.riesim fxtan do eat wry abe=t0�' over line. T.hb It Fru..M.., Gr f d l.. Sows. ltlair D.L S,rr kM. am (ioaer) cats 9a. kala F.barnity SP MN 2010) IkWh 1 3.412 0.0WS 0.15(16 Natural Th- 1 IW.0 O.W55 0.0550 E-10 i.e US Ion 2 120.1 0.0(199 0.0743 B-5 diad US loa 2 126.9 00105 0.(429 G. -h- US k.n 3 125.0 0.0692 0.0739 Dkri US k. 3 129.5 0.0107 0.0830 ERrd m 3 76.1 0.0061 0.0795 US + U5.0 0.0113 0.07" Fsd ail a d15 and 96 0 Di,Y9es fad ail (#1.#2.&#4) U3 Ma 4 111.0 00110 0.0711D US 4 91.0 0.0059 0.0647 Bkdiad(BIW) US twin 4 129.0 O.OW9 0.0777 Dom sommort 'Mme -A. P.I. B.kbtg EM -.d Far.gy Efficrrey Prop.. (PBk�P) 2 The Stye of M..enta ragWa gasolhs and dual finds sold in ds state be otvpmomod by 10% and 5%rhrDl tevessivdy. 3 'Fuel Eoono.ry Aealms of RFG'. US F- roneaaal Prelaaim Agasy. 2007-08-14. htip:0-M govMommaWp Iain. 4 Table G.11 lasr-s-W Lord G --w r n6rwae r Emlasiom A is P)obcwl. I iraisn IJ. Mw 2010, GRG L.aials. Prion Tiotl=ad RYd t Pad tlbeti° Rel m abtfilr Ad of TAbh Gn,.i=r Gr La b,lar far.22"m Fol L.tM (ay.ca9e.at',t 1at.ue..n1.R Propo.. y. Cr,fw Dbd Siuw a L -H G.,.f.a f.6 bind !,q a141.c co, ) 5,750 9,780 10,210 9.025 9,477 9,967 10.740 10.450 5,590 C (,IPA) 2 6,053 9,242 10,747 9,500 6,92) 10,51) 11,305 11.000 5,6"4 COe(brss pr 1,(100 gal) 6.05 9.24 10.75 9,50 9.92 10.51 1111 IL00 5.19 Nation Sal sire 2Y. 76% .'% NMrt I T.Me G.I., G.1 I and 0. 13, Imm,-i..d Lord r rose. Grrenhsar Gm Em4dam Advaia Prosxwl, Versus 1.1, 2010. 2 Saaoe: bop://w-.apa.tov/ma kh dd42096004. Wa 'b addit- b taboo dioeid., auWtd+ila paodae as6Mae (CHs) aed.trer erode (N)O16ae Ms talpips, r waN r HFC aw®as ban lak.g.r aetrdbionas. Tkc enririsr d Cll4 mod Nz0 rc TOAW b vrhde mile wrMW rather dtr Aad sed de-ohmon s dCH., NII, mod HFC, w ad ssaoly eetineed 6..w..ehsb r gar COi. jl.] t>s .uva"e. CHs, NA, .td }f''C asitias apleea)t rm�dy 5 -6 p.e.R dSte OHO =.e..r lora paraga vwads. while CU as,w.ee a.mouet for 9405 p.cm4 acooararg 1rT 9s gbM1 wanerg pderdrd draCll peudsrs ter. (Thea pace..". R esiorrid lmr Mc FPA /rmr.lmry M U.S GrrrnIrowe G.a Earlmaier mrd Slab: 1999 - Z9dl.y Ta enghfy tlria erieate. s. as®sd t►r CH« NrO, sad FP'Ce aaoaat fat 5 pma ttt d raisator, mind the CO, emiwr wins atdtiplid by 10095 b ieowpase fls marihaioa dds dM grumhatw gases. 3 Secrete T.Ne 0.12 lrar.watlsma/ Lerol f�utrrwrar Grnal..x Cs Eatirret. AaoMis Av..d provides be E -IW et�iae fasts. Er,atee 9sat for E-85 ..d E -IO as deris'ad r propetiers eiutees dE-I(q and 4The aatied Sal shat rcf.s b the prar.age there dRs rine htr.petlaYat Sods s,d a Oe US Irma. Soec<(2005 dol: WP://esaaokrew.rrr.a.a(mrty/.p' Php 5 7ratlpatatian fads add. Miasds hate birds dah.W thin s higher tha. the mot -I avenge, dome, ps-gall= GHG =rims will he m6 i.* hater. From 2M] b 2005, tls ms rapmud 111%athrd sm geolm Fwn 2006 b the 9r state added ds d 5%.th=.I . wird fusb. 44 Comm raw9 [JpMsd 9115/14 Table Oa: DesieatboaMMB. Aasrcbted wib Ve.de Mlin Tnvekdr Gasoline Galloas MMBtu Ethanol Gallas MMB. Dine) G.11-MMBtu Bioi iesel Gallons MMB. MMBm per MBeon Taa1MMBtu TaaIVMT VMI, Year: 2006 103,021,426 12,877,678 11,446%25 871,103 24,957,074 3131,941 509,328 65,242 17,445,965 2,407,535,255 7,080 2007 106,606,651 13,325,831 11,945,183 901,418 26,045,742 3_172,924 531,546 68,089 17,668262 2,524,/01,350 6,998 2(08 141,502106 12,687,763 11278.012 858,257 25010,186 3238,819 510.412 65,381 16,950220 2.436,024,630 6,917 2W9 9807/,/49 12,258,894 10,896,794 829,246 23.873.759 3,091.652 994.740 127,421 16,307213 2.385221,345 6,837 2010 97.036,508 12129,564 10,781.834 820,498 23,743.262 3,074,75'_ L^_49,645 160,074 16,194,887 2,400983,970 6,741 - - -- - - 2011 96,168,052 12.021,007 10,685339 913,154 23,663.739 3,064,454 1245,460 159.537 16,058,153 2,385924,781 6,730 2012 93,045,433 11,630,679 10338,381 786,751 22,886,162 2,963,758 1,536,665 196,840 15.578,027 2,476,254,984 6,291 2013 90994,899 11.374,362 10,110544 Nan: I Poel consumption is for the City of Minneapolis from 20061.2(110. Data are from the CO ofMinneepolis Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Clean Air Climate Protection s flu-,--dneloped by ICLEI-local Govemmcnls for Sustainability. 769,412 A Geographic Assecsmcnt, 22,426201 City ofMin ,e 2,904,193 1,731,049 221,739 15269,707 2,511,349,190 6,080 lis, 5/11/12. Date f r other}'cars ere based on linter regression using the actual data and kBla estimates tiom lh. Table 4b: Derivation of Cat. Assochdrd with Vehicle Miles Tnvekd 3 Gratne 3 Gallo. Cast/Callon Taal C." Gallons Eth ..13 C. t/G.liw Totd Cats Dksel a Gull- CaWGalbn Biadiesel3 Tad Furl Cats Total VMT Ful Cah per Taal Cmts Gallons Cme/G.lhr Toral Costs VMT Year: 2006 103.021.426 $ 2.52 $ 259,510.972 11,446,825 S 1.97 S 22,550245 24.957.074 $ 2.67 S 66.610.431 509328 S 3.31 S 1,685,876 S 350,357.524 2407.535255 S 0.15 2007 106,606,651 $ 2.77 S 295,620.243 11.945,183 S 2.29 S 27,125,169 26.045,742 $ 2.86 S 74,542914 531,546 S 307 S 1,631,946 S 398920.472 2,524.701350 S 016 2009 101,502,106 $ 3.13 S 317,498,589 11,278,012 S 2.60 S 21,322,831 25,010.186 $ 3.76 S 93,988.279 510,412 S 3.91 $ 1,995,711 S 442,805,409 2,436,024.630 $ 4.19 2009 98,071,149 $ 2.32 S 227,917350 10,996,794 S 2.21 $ 24,081,915 23,873,759 $ 2.43 S 58,084,856 994,740 S 3.07 '"E"52 S 313,137,972 2385221,345 S 0.13 2414 97,036,508 $ ^_.79 S 270246,675 10,781,834 S 2.42 S 26,092,038 23,743,262 $ ^_.96 S 76,375,029 1249,645 S 3.55 $ 4,43624!1 S 371,149,981 2,400,983,870 $ 4.15 2411 96,168,052 $ 3.55 S 341,396,586 IU685_339 S 3.12 S 33338258 23,663,739 $ 3.80 S X9,969,536 1245,460 S 3.80 % 4,732,748 S 469.437,128 2385,924,781 S 0.20 2012 93,045,433 $ 3.56 S 331,427.832 10,338381 S 3.33 S 34.426809 22.886,162 $ 3.90 S 89233,145 1,536.665 S 4.W S 6200,445 S 461288231 2,476254.984 S 4.19 2013 90,994,899 $ 3.50 S 319,118.167 Nan: I Fuel co.sannlionn for the City ofMi,,rspof, from 2006 m 21110. Data a re fom the City of Min ,,Mie Greenhouse G.sli,-Wits: Governments f r Sustainability. 10,110,544 S 3.19 S 32202083 22.426,201 $ 3.90 S 87.529,463 173 L[W8 S 4.02 S 6,954,486 1 S 444,804,199 2,511348,190 S 0.18 A Geographic Asressmenl, City a Minneapolis,5/11/12. Data for other years are b..dnnl,,... gres.ion using the a,t,,l data and kBtu estimates fom the Clean An Climate Protection s.flware derel.ped by iCLF-1-1 2 Waetly RW Dadbe wRead Bier, Mssaaaaab(a8 pads). Samoa: US Enver Ykmrpisn Apacy.kW/hsw.eia.gw/Arr/R6FaJ6 res �.hlra 3 seen:: Clew CNira AAerrrisr Pwrl Prke US d ://www.afde. araikgwwdl'! 20s�ort 4 Miiwaat s2 DieM ReYi Pow: 8etwse: USE b.rsson , hw//www.as /2DLdpgkFa Table 5o Emission Factors Muand Byprodnaa For the Combustion, d .1d SoRd Waste OEM 2006 2087 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Hennepin Energy Resources Center (NERC) mass bum garbage {ndnentor t GHG emissions tomes : Fossil 133,191 134.057 131,972 129,993 131,292 140,341 126.711 124,160 Bio unit 225,765 227,890 228,264 219,170 219,699 193,804 202,031 204,754 Total waste (US tons) 365,000 346,676 348,979 338,337 363,350 364,575 356,915 337,819 Fossil GHG emission mte tonnes Ion dMSW) 0365 0.387 0.384 0.384 0.361 0.385 0.355 0.368 _ Bio enic GHG emission rate tomes er ton 01 MSW 0.619 0.657 0.654 0.648 0602 0.532 0.566 0.606 B ,.ducts of combustion: Ex rted eleclnci (MWh 221,001 223,487 215,402 187,053 206,178 209,117 197,470 124.099 Ena value ofe� reed electriei (MMBtu) 754,D55 762,538 734,952 639,225 7U3,479 713,507 673,768 423,426 Steam sales 1,0001bs)' 101,507 82,504 89,594 126,456 177,121 vabsd sleet pt. AU. 101,507 92,S4 R9,594 126,456 177.121 Stl6btal ofustery value 754,OS5 762,538 734,952 739,732 765,993 1103,091 809224 600,547 (3H6 d (Isrwe) I 131,666 131,750 123250 101,071 105,937 110,272 94,766 59.103 CdfG d slum bwea)s 6 5 5 7 10 TrustGIIG d alissamusity W atom 131,686 1)1,750 127250 101.077105,941 110,277 1 94,795 59.112 Par tan f MSW Mtal GHG sgaevaisal of *.W dww fly . anderkro 0.360.38 0.35 0.30 0.29 0 70 0.27 17 0. gym C..y Poria." saad Ot dear W hedlfoa s Food GHG a®sem rale bmra b d'MSW 0.365 0.387 0.3t1 0.394 0.361 0.3115 0.355 0.369 CsHGss was nae uawBs badMSW 0.619 0.657 0.654 0.648 0,6(2 0,332 0.566 DAM (M mull *Vkm fins y p°dtnWDy RDF 0.36 0.31 0.75 0.30 0.29 0.30 0.27 oe0.17 abwlim (ere per bane MSW P..-* Data for 2006 b 2010 Gam Cty f3fl swa a ft. Gnusd.arssr Gus lavesaMas: AC gmpMc l-Moey. Ciy ef.411-apshr, 5/11/12. The wteoey iadWo dMa for the Homos" Ea rgy' Resosasx Caner (HERO) Ret HemWm Canty, wMds otms the mwebuM wu64orasurp grbW bcsaaeor. 2010 dna available pr dat 115 EPA's GHG MasdW., Repebeg RWs: lulplIgftglalaspa.gov/ghWAsaia.do. Acmdi g b the ICLEI Csaswwpy Pnarml (Appadi< E),'The mmbssnion dMSP' cetlpasesN orignrih mendwwrandI fian.sail fuels (e.g., plash s, aatan kdiles, robtr, liquid :.!amts, red waale od) 1 -ft.. (.sell bused COa. The COI emisabw fins mmbu" the bums, porma dMSW (eg., yrd wane, PaPeT psadaeta) re brdogs b at'igaa rd -,.Pled sepraldy. Ody tls.erl49.esd aAwsnae. >C oom.d far else purposes f arbm boadiwe rise®n pa d. Hsiaml (Appubx F is, 15). The foga 14..d maiwon also .k%* an dbe Clte ad NP-. Do. for lour stdy 3e'rs fiem Fhassim County. 2 Sessse for A- oke: Hennepin Coeay. Saewt -W a.*.A .arias with pavane and feed err waspu nre. Eargy vdne uptesesb industry alaxpled calmer wad when e"d i kB1w%. Sonne: Natural Rteawsea. Cauda, hop://rses.ssraw.ge 531 nem-Witiesr re ad 1 sone: 3 Shoe.des aged:ad" S. aalswglioe m the dowoam Aima co rgy ayame. Sax a them dndtrn gw agwis 100 kBm, dw enoi value dWs covorwil nor a clivi" by 100 tion Br wlard go easisdots faro,1. yield (910 tsssiasiow. 45 Cowvnbw !*Carr Updslad. 9/15/11 Thea rcdbw d—W fLd OU)F) halA- pteosss slid wens iso feel pdkts &M R bsed s oetdW Xad Envpy p—pinks M—.t.. Aom,ding b W ETA's Wage R.IW- Model 1 (WARM). proeeoer MSW fa o — bwi Wt%ty (m h w IIERC). lie EPA sed ICLE14JSA h— yd todrive a Ono— ,.* HOaissimtate Wt applies b MSW Wt Ms bis peoasamd ad b..w m this swear. Ass detail mW s aewpnbk � ..v3d bk. d.OHG atkaaoat n6e Rr the NERC Goility is wed. The M4N OHO egen'� d Ow doematy Mptodod is wwmel to be the ssa as for aWostd deaeidty for din NERC faalry. Q: Cost Factors Updated: 9/24/14 Cost Factors 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Electricity: NSP Minnesota electrics rates dollars per MWh Residential $ 99.70 $ 103.35 $ 103.33 $ 107.94 $ 111.87 Commercial $ 76.11 $ 78.33 $ 76.95 S 81.52 $ 83.32 Industrial $ 61.88 $ 63.44 S 63.62 S 64.94 S 68.19 Retail S 78.96 $ 81.08 $ 80.94 S 84.61 S 87.45 Average of Commercial and Industrial Rates $ 69.00 $ 70.89 S 70.29 $ 73.23 S 75.76 Average Retail Price of Electricity, Minnesota (dollars per MWh): 2 Residential $ 91.80 $ 97.40 S 100.40 S 105.90 S 109.60 Commercial $ 74.80 $ 78.80 $ 79.20 $ 83.80 S 86.30 Industrial $ 56.90 S 58.70 $ 62.60 $ 62.90 S 64.70 Average of Commercial and Industrial Rates S 65.85 S 68.75 S 70.90 $ 73.35 S 75.50 Natural Gas: NSP Minnesota natural gas rates (dollars per therm)r Residential $ 1.105 $ 1.132 $ 0.897 S 0.894 $ 0.879 C & I Firm $ 0.998 S 1.070 $ 0.832 S 0.814 S 0.806 C & I Interruptible S 0.725 $ 0.897 S 0.540 S 0.533 S 0.540 Average of Commercial and Industrial Rates S 0.862 $ 0.983 $ 0.686 S 0.673 S 0.673 Average Retail Price of Natural Gas, Minnesota (dollars per therm): 3 Residential $ 1.114 j $ 1.129 S 0.899 $ 0.876 $ 0.885 Commercial $ 1.014 S 1.052 S 0.796 $ 0.760 S 0.746 Industrial $ 0.765 $ 0.905 S 0.566 $ 0.558 S 0.555 Average of Commercial and Industrial Rates $ 0.890 $ 0.979 $ 0.681 $ 0.659 S 0.651 Vehicle Miles Traveled: Cost per vehicle mile traveled dollars per mile Total fuel costs' S 0.16 S 0.18 S 0.13 S 0.15 S 0.20 Solid waste management (dollars per ton) ° Processed via combustion (incineration and RDF $ 175 $ 175 $ 175 S 175 S 175 processing) Landfilling $ 145 $ 145 S 145 $ 145 S 145 Recycling $ 170 S 170 $ 170 $ 170 $ 170 Potable Witter Production and Distribution Electricity consumption per gallon produced and 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 distributed (kWh pergallon) e 0.0035 Cost per gallon 7 $ 0.00022 S 0.00022 $ 0.00024 S 0.00024 $ 0.00025 Metro Wastewater Treatment Plant ° Electricity consumption (MWh) 155,502 144,693 138,685 126,149 124,925 Cost of electricity S 9,622,476 $ 9,179,324 $ 8,823,140 $ 8,192,116 S 8,518,636 Natural gas consumption (therms) 733,343 843,914 790,100 688,632 846,982 Cost ofnatural gas S 631,966 $ 829,977 S 542,293 $ 463,780 S 569,888 Total energy costs S 10,254,442S 10,009,301 S 9,365,433 S 8,655,896 S 9,088,523 Fuel oil ($ per gallon) 9 S 1.21 1 $ 1.70 1 S 1.16 $ 1.64 $ 1.87 Notes: 1 I Source: Xcel Energy Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, State Electricity Profiles - Minnesota Electricity Profile 2012, "Table 8: Retail sales, revenue, ar 2 1900-2012". Data for 2013 are forecasted based on actual 2007-2012 data. http://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/minnesota/ 3 US Energy Information Administration, http://www.cia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_rri_sum_dcu smn a.htm 4 Total fuel costs are derived in Table 4b in the Conversion Factors spreadsheet. Figures are highly variable averages based on 2008 data. Since data is not available for subsequent years, the averages are assumed to be relative) study period. The data exclude external costs associated with transportation; air, water, and land pollution; greenhouse gases; resource depletion; 5 external values associated with profits, economic activity, employment, resource & energy conservation, reduced long term liability, etc. Not sho household hazardous waste and problem materials (5225 per ton), source -separated organics (5220 per ton), and re -use and reduction efforts (w neutral). Source: "2008 Payments and Spending for Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) in Minnesota," Sig Scheurle, Minnesota Polluti Electrical consumption rate is based on the collective experience of numerous US cities as reported in the Climate and Air Pollution Planning As. 6 Governments for Sustainability USA, "Low maintenance landscaping" model. Cost per gallon equals electricity per gallon times the statewide average, commercial/industrial electricity rate. Baseline analyses for other cities i 7 consumption costs related to the production and distribution of potable water constitute about 8% of total costs. Therefore, the electricity costs are Ore natural gas costs. Source of energy consumption figures: Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. Costs derived using NSP Minnesota cost averages since tin 8 Paul. 47 Seasonal Cooling and Heating Degree Days Updated: 9/30/14 Year 1,2 1'2 Normalizin Factor 3 -HDD ' CDD HDD CDD 2000 7,528 816 101% 92% 2001 7,281 1,017 104% 74% 2002 7,550 1,040 100% 72% 2003 7,673 985 99% 76% 2004 7,447 707 102% 107% 2005 7,159 1,096 106% 69% 2006 6,750 1,141 112% 66% 2007 7,336 1,181 103% 64% 2008 8,264 859 92% 88% 2009 7,778 774 97% 97% 2010 7,170 1,088 106% 69% 2011 7,357 1,129 103% 67% 2012 6,390 1,238 119% 61% 2013 8,196 1,077 92% 70% 2020 2030 Base 3 7,580 753 100% 100% Notes: Heating degree days (HDD), are a measure of how much (in degrees), and for how long (in days), outside air temperature was lower than a specific base temperature (or balance point). They are used for calculations relating to the energy consumption required to heat buildings. Cooling degree days (CDD) 1 are a measure of how much (in degrees), and for how long (in days), outside air temperature was higher than a specific base temperature. They are used for calculations relating to the energy consumption required to cool buildings. Source: Degree Days.net (http://www.degreedays.net). 2 Station ID: KMSP, Base temperature: 65F Because temperature has an effect on building energy consumption, this table allows the normalization of the building energy consumption data to better assess year-to-year consumption changes and trends. For Edina the "Base" figures are the 30 -year averages (1981-2010) of Heating Degree Days and Cooling Degree Days (HDD/CDD) from the Minneapolis St. Paul International Airport (source: http://www. ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/land-based-station-data/land-based-datasets/cl imate-normals). 3 These serve as the bases for calculating the "Normalizing Factor". For example, if the actual seasonal cooling degree day is 10% higher than the Base, the portion of electricity consumption attributable to air conditioning is decreased by 10% to be normalized. It is assumed that 25% of all electricity consumption is for air conditioning. The remaining 75% is unaffected. Similarly for heating, if the seasonal CDD figure is 10% higher than the Base, the portion of total natural gas consumption associated with heating (which is assumed to be 80%) is reduced by 10% for normalization. 48 Notes: 1 The assumed distributions of annual vehicle distances traveled are based on a personal communication from Thomas Nelson, Minnesota Departr the remaining annual vehicle mites traveled, passenger cars account for 70% and light trucks 30%. These percentages have remained approxima 2 The assumed distribution of fuel used by vehicle type is from the default assumptions of ICLEI's Clean Air - Climate Protection (CACP) softwa 3 The methodology is a combination of that developed for the City of Minneapolis Greenhouse Gas Inventories: A Geographic Assessmen t, City Mankato Minnesota, 2014. 4 The assumed mileages of the three vehicle types are from the U.S. Energy Information Administration /Annual Energy Review 2011, Table 2.8. estimates. S Because of the Minnesota biofuel mandates, all gasoline sold in Minnesota was 10% ethanol starting in 2003 and all diesel was 2% biodiesel sta Accounting and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, October 2012. 49 Vellidle Miks Tmvekd Updated: 9/29/14 man of 201 2002 2w 2004 2605 Am ad vewde Now Trwabd I 2006 2067 2m no 2010 2011 2012 USTrnak (USTH) 3.4 89,172,420 82,518,105 84,003,290 82,%0,488 83,561,275 84,336,170 84,336,170 60,907,960 81,009,560 78,361,140 78,089,925 77,527,950 MwresahTrunk 8.1 290,272,455 259,774,515 264,450,530 265,612,422 267,535,510 252,691,710 252,891,710 253,137,678 253,456,000 249,501,590 240,004,725 260,472,318 Counly Shoe Aid (CS 7.9 63,648,700 68,104,255 51,918,330 53,049,870 53,292,920 53,626,355 49,953,900 50,303,040 50,310,140 49,767,750 49,469,545 52,955,076 M Sttae Aid Street MSAS 40.1 76,153,235 76,989,815 83,539,010 85,057,302 82,356,775 82,765,940 83,118,165 83,655,156 81,871,690 81,194,615 81,194,615 82,526,412 mudievel Sheets 162.7 35,614,530 37,426,005 37,396,630 37,118,622 37,035,820 37,035,820 40,059,115 40,309,410 40,199,275 39,949,250 39,955,090 39,994,650 Teed VMT 2223 53.5,061 346 524,612,695 $21309,790 523,796,764 523,762,3N 516,657,995 516,359,068 560,313,244 506,846,665 490,974,345 496,713,900 313,476,406 Percent change from previous yew -5% -1% 0.5% 0.0'/. -3% -0.1% -0.4% -0.3% -1.6% -0.5% 3.4% GHG emission rate (taneerninm VMT1 Z' 475.7 478.9 464.7 461.6 461.9 458.5 452.0 441.4 441.4 442.5 441.6 439.9 GHG eanesems tames 2649019 25130 242,277 241,64 241,929 234,128 230,692 224,377 223,713 220,778 219343 225,869 MMBtapermillion VMT 1 7,080 6,998 6,917 6,837 6,741 6,730 6,579 MMBte associated rridt VMT 3,615,459 3,571,493 3,516,003 3,465,311 3,363,586 3,342,865 3,378,161 P noes: P 47,465 47,570 48,156 46,050 47,448 46,8% 47,090 48,169 49,491 47,941 46,262 48,829 Per VMT 11,694 11,032 10,825 10,901 11,039 10,889 10,838 10,553 10,2411 10,406 10,292 10,516 Percent chance Gem prevmm yeer -5.7% -1.9% 0.7% 1.3% -1.4% -0.5X -2.6•/. -3.0% 1.6% -1.1% 2.2% GHG missions tames 5.56 5.28 5.03 5.03 5.10 4.99 4.90 4.66 4.52 4.61 4.54 4.63 Pcrcan Gam .5.0%1 4.9%j 0.0%1 1.3% -2.1% -1.9%1 4.9% -3.0% 1.9X -1.3%1 1.8% Naps: 1 Source of data: Miwwe Depertrnent of Trampertation (MNDOT). hap://u,".dotsb e.nm.w&haW%ry/dam/dmb wodwtLhW kVMT. Mitis of roadway vary shgMly over tine w deugmatiom of roads dwW. F*wes Kiwi in 2006 mila�es. 2 The Vchwele Emissions bb inclades the sources for do GHG ermsmom rates. Table 4a a do Conversion Faotas tab imeiadss the sauces for the estinmse of the enaV oomminiption rates (NOA to per 100 rrillian VMT). - 3 GHG emission rates for die rotionsl text decrease w oWer less-etticient vehicles we replaced by new, more et5cusA ones mad, to a losers dogractheproduction of"cleam a feels. 50 Vehicle Miles Traveled Charts Updated 9/29/14 12,000 MOM mmmm 11,500 4.0 1 aif Triler.1 12,000 11,500 4.0 11,000— — — ML - T _ M 0 i ° 3.0 — 10,500 n — — 1 e e s 2.0 _ s — — 10,000 1.0 Per -Capita Greenhouse Gas Emissions 9,500 (dashed trend line) 0.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Per -Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (dashed trend line) 9,000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 6.0 5.0 4.0 T 0 ° 3.0 n e s 2.0 1.0 Per -Capita Greenhouse Gas Emissions (dashed trend line) 0.0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 51 Airport S6arec Minneapolis Saint Paul International Airport Updated: 9/29/14 category 2095 20% 2097 20113 2009 2010 2011 1 2012 2613 Minneapolis St. Paul International (MSP) Airport: r' Z Departing flight and airport CO2e emission (tonnes) 4,300,481 4,054,307 3,808,133 3,305,288 2,802,443 3,197,170 3,482,257 3,241,459 3,096,336 Aircraft operations z 532,239 475,668 452,972 450,044 432,395 437,075 436,506 425,332 431,328 CO2e per operation (tonnes) 8.1 8.5 8.4 7.3 6.5 7.3 8.0 7.6 7.2 City share of MSP Airport emissions 3 Percent of city resident, home-based trips, as a percent of MSP 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% 1.5% !total home-based trips j City allocation of airport emissions (tonnes) 64,507 60,815 57,122 49,579 42,037 47,958 52,234 48,622 46,445 Noter. The Metropolitan Airport Commission conducts an annual greenhouse gas assessment for the Minneapolis St. Paul International (MSP) Airport. (Refer to: 2012 Greenhouse Gas Report: Metrsopotitmn Airports 1 Commission, November 2013, http://www.mspairport.cofn/docs/about-msp/sustainabilityN NAL-MSP-2012-GHG-Report-v3.aspx). Linear regressions were used to estimate GHG emissions for 2006, 2008, and 2013, for which inventories have not been prepared. Changes in calculation methodology and scope of the ground access vehicles are reflected for all years as of the 2012 inventory. 2 1 Source for MSP Airport aircraft operations: http://www.mspairport.com/about-msp/swistks.aspx. Consistent with the ICLEI Community Protocol, the city's share of the MSP Airport's total emissions were assumed to be equal to the percent of hone -based vehicle trips associated with the city that had either 3 an origin or destination at the Airport. The Metropolitan Council calculated the "percent of city resident, tone -basal trips, as a percent of MSP total home-based trips" for 2010. The Airport's total tome -based trips equaled 51,506. The city's share of vehicle trips was assumed to be relatively stable and therefore used for all study years. 52 Solid Waste Management and Wastewater Treatment Updated 10/6/14 Solid Waste Management' 2007 200E 2009 2010 2011 2012 Hennepin County' Population (thousa ds) 1,157.3 1,169.2 1,169.0 1,152.4 1,163.1 1,180.1 Processing/disposal methods: MSW processed at resource recovery facilities (thousands of tons): 502.9 487.4 429.1 352.1 399.9 451.9 Hennepin Energy Resources Center (mass bum incinerator) 330.6 338.9 343.1 351.7 350.3 347.0 Elk River and Ramey/Washington a refuse derived fuel F) facilities 172.3 148.5 86.0 0.4 49.6 104.9 Processed via combustion as a %of total MSW managed 32% 34% 32% 26% 70% 34% Total recycled (thousands of tons) 604.5 1 597.8 573.0 564.2 572.6 586.9 Recycled as a % oftotal MSW manaed 38% 41% 42% 420/ 43% 440io Land disposal of NEW (thousands of tons) 480.0 366.8 355.1 414.5 349.4 299.5 Land disposal as %oftotal MSW managed 30% 25% 26% 31% 26010 22% Total MSW inane ed' 1,587.3 1,452.0 1,357.2 1,330.7 1,321.9 1,338.4 Per-capita MSW managed 1.37 1.24 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 Methane recovery calculation: 0 Land dis osaI of MSW thousands of tons) 480.0 366.8 355.1 414.5 349.4 299.5 Unprocessed MSW to landfills without methane recovery (thousands of tons) ° 129.0 1 97.5 46.1 5.9 3.7 5.6 Percent of unprocessed NEW landfilled in landfills with methane recovery 73% 73% 87% 99% 991/6 980/. Methane recovery factor 6 - 55% 55% 65% 74% 74% 74% Edina' Population 47,090 48,169 49,491 47,941 48,262 48,829 Estimated total MSW managed 64,588 59,822 57,458 55,357 54,853 55,376 Per-capita MSW managed 1.37 1.24 1.16 1.15 1.14 1.13 Processing/disposal methods: Estimated MSW processed via combustion 0 Hennepin Enerp Resources Center (mass burn incinerator) 20,461 20,081 18,165 14,645 16,593 18,699 Elk River and Ramsey/Washington a refuse derived fuel F facilities Estimated processed via combustion as a % of MSW managed 32% 34% 32% 26% 301% 34% Estimated MSW recycled 24,597 24,628 24,261 23,470 23,761 24,283 Estimated recycled as a % of MSW managed 38% 41% 42% 42% 43% 441% Estimated land disposal of MSW 19,529 15,113 15,033 17,241 14,498 12,394 Estimated hid disposal as a %of MSW managed 30% 25% 26% 31% 26% 22% GHG emission estimates (tonnes) a GHG emissions for combustion tonnes per ton incinerated) 9 Hennepin Energy Resources Center (mass bum incinerator Fossil 7,912 7,709 6,973 5,292 6,387 6,640 Biogenic 13,450 13,135 11,767 8,815 8,821 10,584 Elk River and Ram /Wash n (Newport) refuse derived fuel (RDF) facilities Total GHG emissions from combusting MSW 7,912 1 7,709 6,973 5,292 6,387 6,640 GHG emission rate for landfilling (tonnes per ton landfilled) 10 0.441 0.439 0.339 0.254 0.252 0.258 GHG emissions from landfilling MSW 9,611 6,629 5,099 4,387 3,651 3,195 Total estimated GHG emissions 16,523 14,338 12,073 9,679 10,038 9,835 Per-capita GHG emissions 0.35 0.30 0.24 0.20 0.21 0.20 GHG value or energy exports of MSW combustion (tonnes)" 7,776 7,092 5,427 4,270 5,019 4,966 Metro Wastewater Treatment Haat (tones of COA) " .2007 200E 2009 2010 2011 2012 Fossil Emissions Scope2 932,368 120,234 Scope 1 83,346 92,569 115,241 79,388 99,124 81,295 98,162 85,629 78,621 75,248 Total Fossil Emissions 215,714F-202,803 194,629 180,419 183,791 153,869 Biogenic Emissions 142,117 137,302 129,735 163,565 138,083 128,743 Total emissions from the Metro Wastewater Treatment Plant (tonnes) 357,831 340,105 324,364 343,984 321,874 282,612 Percent of fossil emissions attributable to the City 2.321% 2.546/6 2.56%1 2.48% 2.40% 3.12% Emissions attributable to the City 5,005 5,151 Nates: 1 Municipal solid waste (MSW) in U.S. tons unless otherwise noted. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are in metric tonnes. 4,983 4,474 4,411 4,801 2 Data from County Certification Annual Reports (MPCA's formal survey of county solid waste officers). Much of this information can also htt ://www. .state.mn.us/index. h data/score/r Im -and-solid-waste-data.html. be found in the SCORE reports: 3 Estimates of on-site disposal and problem materials not recycled (PMNR) are not included. 4 To estimate the GHG emissions from landfilled waste, methane recovery must be accounted for because methane is the primary GHG emission from landfills. 5 All waste landfilled in Minnesota or delivered to the Central Disposal facility in Iowa went to landfills with methane recovery. The remaining have methane recovery. Data on the distribution of MS W by landfill is provided in the County Certification Annual Reports to the MPGA. waste went to landfills in Wisconsin 6 Stafffrom the MPCA recommended using a 75% methane recovery rate for unprocessed MSW in a landfill with methane recovery. The "Methane recovery factor" is derived by mu percent of the total landfilled waste that is deposited in landfills with methane recovery times the MPCA avenge recovery rate of 75% for methane. 7 Per-capita amounts by waste management method for the County are used to estimate per-capita amounts for the City. 8 When estimating total recycling, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's SCORE reports show a 5% credit for composting in the MSW totals. It is not a factor for estimating GHG emissions because proper composting of organic materials generates waste in the County. Waste collected for composting i a net zero amount of GHG emissions. 9 It is assumed that the city's waste will be sent to the closest processing facility. For MSW combustion, only the fossil-based emissions are counted for the purposes of carbon baseli per the ICLEI Community Protocol (Appendix E, p. 15). The fossil-based emissions also include all of the CH0 and N20 emissions. Also refer to the explanatory footnotes dealing combustion of MSW in the Conversion Factors spreadsheet. 10 The Clean Air Climate Protection (CACP) software, developed by ICLEI--Local Governments for Sustainability, estimates the GHG emissions resulting from landfilling of the MS for processing. The software incorporates the waste composition percentages from the 2000 MPCA waste composition study and calculates the GHG emissions based on the follow 976.3x +976.3 where y=GHG emissions and x=10 Methane Recovery Factor. I 1 The HERC facility has two byproducts, electricity which is sold to Xcel Energy, and steam, which is sold to Target Field, NRG (district energy), and the Hennepin Energy Center (d Consistent with the ICLEI Community Protocol, the GHG emissions associated with these byproducts are not treated as "negative" emissions in the calculation of the GHG emissio are disclosed here for informational purposes. The footnotes for Table 5 in the Conversion Factors spreadsheet contain additional information. 12 Source: Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, Linda Henning, Special Projects Manager. Emissions data is consistent with that reported to The Climate Registry. The pert emissions attributable to the City is calculated as the wastewater flow from the City divided by total wastewater treated. 53 Community Solid Waste: Waste Composition Updated: 6/24/10 s 2000 MPCA Study 2005 Iowa CACP Category 1 2 Change Study Paper products 34.2% 33.0% -1.2% Food waste 3 12.9% 13.0% 0.1% Plant debris 2.9% 3.1% 0.2% Wood/textiles a 11.4% 12.9% 1.5% All other waste 38.6% 38.0% -0.6% Total 100.0%1 100.0% Notes: (1) Source: Final Report, Statewide MSW Composition Study: A Study of Discards in the State of Minnesota, Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, March 2000. (2) Iowa Statewide Waste Characterization Study, Iowa Department of Natural Resources, February 2006, http://www. iowadnr.gov/portals/idnr/uploads/waste/wastechar05.pdf (3) Includes diapers (4) Includes 'other organic material" (5) CACP refers to the Clean Air Climate Protection software developed by ICLEI--Local Governments for Sustainability. The 2000 waste composition study by the MPCA is the most recent study of its kind in Minnesota. Since the more recent 2005 Iowa waste composition study did not vary more than 1.5% from the older Minnesota study, the MPCA study was used to estimate GHG emissions. 54 Population, Households, and Jobs Updated: 8/12/14 city Hennepin County 7 County Year Population' Households' Jabs' Population' Region' 1970 44,046 13,005 960,080 1,874,612 1980 46,073 17,961 941,411 1,985,873 1990 46,070 19,860 1,032,431 2,288,721 2000 47,425 20,996 1,116,206 2,642,062 2001 47,465 21,016 1,123,587 2,674,927 2002 47,570 21,104 1,130,880 2,708,916 2003 48,156 21,149 1,139,887 2,740,985 2004 48,050 21,128 1,144,037 2,771,030 2005 47,448 21,422 1,150,912 2,810,179 2006 46,896 21,100 1,152,508 2,821,779 2007 47,090 21,250 48,383 1,157,283 2,849,003 2008 48,169 21,285 49,202 1,169,151 2,870,250 2009 49,491 21,357 47,006 1,168,983 2,881,812 2010 47,941 20,672 47,676 1,152,425 2,849,567 2011 48,262 20,848 49,121 1,163,060 2,873,444 2012 48,829 20,905 50,760 1,180,138 2,909,001 2013 49,216 21,313 48,705 1,195,058 2,950,885 2040 53,300 23,000 56,100 1,429,500 3,673,860 Notes: Source for population and household data: Minnesota Department of Administration, 1 Minnesota State Demographic Center. "Minnesota Population Estimates." http://www.demography.state.mn.us/estimates.httnl Source: North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and the Quarterly Census of Employment Wages (QCEW): (http://www.positivelyminnesota.com/apps/imi/gcew/ResultsDisp.aspx). Data is from "Total 2 of All Ownerships" and "Total, All Industries." The Quarter 2 data was chosen because it tends to be the least affected by seasonal fluctuation. The annual data was not chosen because it is an average of the four quarters and, thus, does not provide for optimal comparison purposes. Source (Forcast made 5/28/14): Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities: 2040 forecasts http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/data-download/DD-starLaspx. 55 Precipitation and Potable Water Distribution Updated: 9/26/14 Precipitation 1,2 Potable Water Distribution IlonW Period Zip Code Inches Residential Commercial Industrial Others Non Residential Total Total 2000 1,976,895,000 650,000,000 650,000,000 2,626,895,000 2001 1,899,560,250 547,605,000 547,6059000 2,447,165,250 2002 1,199,348,400 540,525,700 - - 540,525,700 1,739,874,100 2003 2,165,813,250 741,585,750 27,966,750 341,769 769,894,269 2,9359707,519 2004 1,859,9189250 647,276,250 - 355,800 647,632,050 2,507,550,300 2005 1,9399065,750 346,206,250 688,180 346,894,430 2,285,%0,180 2006 2,0699287,350 584,073,650 3,321,200 587,394,850 2,656,682,200 2007 55436 35.35 1,903,815,000 599,841,000 44,516,000 644,357,000 2,548,172,000 2008 24.52 1,741,187,529 570,902,065 6,757,000 577,659,065 2,318,846,594 2009 26.67 1,776,138,000 331,537,500 - 171,907,650 503,445,150 2,279,583,150 2010 35.62 1,299,661,682 372,929,219 - 206,197,953 579,127,172 1,878,788,854 2011 28.09 1,626,574,500 543,375,750 - 204,374,000 747,749,750 2,374,324,250 2012 30.15 1,833,954,000 597,000,750 - 231,821,500 828,822,250 2,662,776,250 2013 34.39 1,655,865,000 535,908,750 - 212,588,500 748,497,250 2,404,362,250 2020 - 2030 Notes: 1 Source: http://climate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/wetland. asp - 2 Since the City has more than one zip code within its boundaries, one zip code was chosen by the following factors (1) most land area included in city boundaries (2) highest population (3) highest density of population. City boundary maps with overlayed zip code boundaries can be found at the website http://www.city- data.com. 3 Source: Minnesota DNR Ecological and Water Resources. All water appropriation permit holders in Minnesota are required to report their monthly water use from each source of water annually to Minnesota DNR (Minnesota Statutes 103G.281). In addition, public water suppliers serving over 1000 people are required to submit: "the number of connections and amount of use by customer category and volume of water unaccounted for with the annual report of water use" (Minnesota Statutes 103G.291). 56 Recycling Report tttHu f i�' y) www.EdinaMN.gov Topics • Residential Recycling Collection Materials Annual Tonnages • What's Next State Goals Business Recycling New State Law Requirements Organics www.EdinaMN.gov Paper • Boxes n cereal, cracker, shoe, gift, electronic, toothpaste and other boxes of that similar material www.EdinaMN.gov Paper Phone books, magazines, mail, office, and school papers www.EdinaMN.gov Paper Cardboard boxes www.EdinaMN.gov Paper Newspaper and the inserts www.EdinaMN.gov Paper Shredded paper in closed paper bags www.EdinaMN.gov Cartons Milk, juice boxes, soup, broth and wine cartons www.EdinaMN.gov Plastic Bottles, jugs, cups, containers and packaging www.EdinaMN.gov Plastic Edina's recycling program also collects plastic bags. Place bags together in a plastic bag so they don't blow away as easily in the collection process. www.EdinaMN.gov Glass Food and beverage bottles and jars www.EdinaMN.gov Metal Food and beverage cans www.EdinaMN.gov 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 l An of Lqu MIXED PAPER GLASS CANS PLASTIC TOTAL TONS ■2013 ■ 2014 www.EdinaMN.gov Residential Recycling Cart Sizes am "III UwTv 4 IF A 7 uep n . zu- A www.EdinaMN.gov What's next? \. atow / The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2010-2030 established a solid waste management goal of: 45% recycling recovery 3% organics recovery to reduce the amount of materials entering a landfill. www.EdinaMN.gov What's next Business Recycling In 2014, the Minnesota Legislature expanded the recycling requirements. Commercial buildings in the seven -county metro area that generate four cubic yards or more of trash per week must begin recycling at least 3 (three) materials by January1, 2016 (MN Statute 115A.151) www.EdinaMN.gov o, Business Recycling The Energy and Environment Commission had a volunteer group working on educating and improving recycling at local businesses. The volunteers worked in conjunction with Hennepin County Staff for signage and grant money. www.EdinaMN.gov Will] 2000 1500 M 500 Business Recycling 2013 2014 *Data obtained from Edina Solid Waste reports. ■2013 m 201 1ltNH www.EdinaMN.gov U Metal, Plastic, Imetal Glass. Bakes. pmokA Paper,CartWS rit tam. aid Cardteaarrl rpax, (*manes Businesses can find FREE resources at: www.Hennepin.usand www.pca.state.mn.us search word: Business Recycling • • 1 4Ah a • �,. www.EdinaMN.gov Organics Le � n � ny O N� .,bn f� H Organics are waste materials that will compost. They consist of plant and animal food products that are able to biodegrade or compost. www.EdinaMN.gov 14W C+lA© �-,•AL—.dom The Energy and Environment Commission is taking a look at what can be done to capture organics. Currently the refuse haulers may provide the service should a resident request organics collection. If the refuse hauler does not provide the service, a citizen may check with other companies to find that service. www.EdinaMN.gov Contact Info: Solvei Wilmot, RS Environmental Health Specialist Recycling Coordinator 952-826-0463 swilmot@EdinaMN.gov I www.EdinaMN.gov www.EdinaMN.gov Solar Report PROJECT PROFILE City Hall Solar (Online Fall 2012) 91 • $95,000 annual energy cost for City Hall • 24KW solar, sized to about 1/75 annual electric use or $1306/yr savings. • Demonstration Project Cost • $200,384 project cost with entire amount paid though ARRA and State Grants. • Lighting project comparison: $1,549/yr savings estimate for $10,953 • Building envelope project comparison: $1,990/yr savings estimate for $24,131 a.com PROJECT PROFILE A aNztx Grandview Tire &Auto (Online Spring 2012) • $12,000 annual energy cost, Audit revealed $800/yr savings through efficiency. • 27KW solar, sized to about 1/3 annual electric use or $2000/yr savings. • Business ethic of sustainability and energy efficiency. Approx. 5 year payback with tax credits and incentives. Cost/Finance • $131,400 project cost with $31,700 financed through special assessment at 7.0% +0% .Com 3 r w `u c w Grandview Tire and Auto 31.12MWh m 20144M 2014-Ffb 20141M 2014 -Apt 2M"Uy 2014,M 2014M 2014*4 2014-S" 2M4 -Oct 2014440v 2014Du 2014 City Hall 17.66 MWh CityofEdina.com Lifetime Grandview (27 KW / 83.3 MWh) '� Legend,."; :072 20132014 tots 01 Lifetime City Hall (24 KW / 34.6 MWh) CityofEdina.com EV Report Project Work Plan — Year 1 Report Task 1: Purchase Electric Vehicle (EV) Description: City fleet manager will purchase new Nissan Leaf and commission a stylized partial vinyl wrap that draws attention the Edina EV web presence. Result: In August 2013 a Nissan Leaf EV was purchased for $29,633.00. A partial Vinyl Wrap was commissioned for $1,981.81 and an EV charging station was installed for $1,049.00 for a total capital of $32,663.81. Estimated capital expense was $32,445.20 in the grant application. Attached are photos of the EV and wrap. Task 2: Track Cost of Operation Description: Will track the total cost of operation and maintenance until June 30, 2014. Plan to voluntarily track this information for an additional 2 years. Result: The EV went to the dealer for a free annual battery check and the results were nominal. No other maintenance was needed. Total through November 2014 totaled 5760 miles. Total energy use totaled 1470 kWh (at 3.9 mi/kWh and $0.12/kWh) and total energy costs were $176.4. Equivalent average fuel costs (28mpg and $3.20/gal) would have totaled $658.29 for a savings of $483.89. Attached are gas price trend data. Task 3: Web Presence Description: Restyle www.edinagogreen.org or new domain with EV content and progress report on this grant with links to other City sustainability initiatives such as the Home Energy Squad and Edina Emerald Energy Program. Result: www.edinaMN.gov/GoGreen landing page was created that includes information on the EV and other sustainability initiatives at the City of Edina. Page views for the EV website, and associated web pages, totaled 950 for the prior 12 months. Task 4: Evaluate and Report Description: Report ongoing cost of operation, environmental benefit and ability of car to meet user needs on City website. Produce final report to MPCA that includes metrics on cost/benefit and environmental services as well as narrative describing user and community feedback received until June 30, 2014. Plan to voluntarily track and report this information for an additional 2 years. Result: (In addition to the cost of operation and public website report summarized above) Vehicle utilization was low compared to the estimated usage, but relatively high compared to comparable fleet vehicles. Estimated usage for grant cost calculation was 15K miles. A review of similar vehicle utilization showed average inspection vehicle usage range from 3200-3900 miles per year in the Engineering department, and from 5400-6400 miles per year in the Building Inspections division. Actual usage was 5760 miles. Attached are example vehicle schedules. Cost/Benefit was estimated at grant application and after 1 year of use. From the initial assumptions, gas averaged $3.20/gal instead of $3.75/gal, fuel efficiency of the EV was 3.9 mi/kWh up from the 83 estimate of 3.4 mi/kWh, and total capital costs were slightly higher than estimated, as described above. Estimated and actual University of Minnesota "alternative vehicle decision tool' summaries are attached. Environmental Services: GHG reductions of 0.94 metric tons fell short of the estimated 2.0 metric tons due to lower than expected vehicle use. User and Community Feedback: The Nissan Leaf EV has met user expectation and is well suited for engineering inspections. Very limited community feedback was received. 84 ESTIMATE Enter appropriate values in the yellow cells. As you enter your data, note on the graph which type of vehicle has low accumulated discount costs in a particular year of operation (the lower line means cheaper). This spreadsheet is designed for sensitivity analysis -changing variables to determine the effects of these changes, Try different values in the yellow cells, such as purchase price of the vehicle and how many miles you expect to drive per year, and see what effect they have on cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This tool downloaded from the University of Minnesota Extension publication, Should I buy an alternative vehicle?, at extension.umn.edu/energy/vehicle. Car pricing and' perfotmanaaassumptions _ Monthly car payments (if financed) $ - "7`^ "'r �•�•••," .... � ...... „",6` `•`�•, •• •"••`•" "r t Negotiated Purchase Price (plus charging station) $ 26,500 $ 32,600 Average monthly engine maintenance costs Down payment (if financed) or total purchase price 25.35 $ 26,500 $ 32,600 $60,000 Months of car loan 238.80 360 360 Annual gasoline usage (gal.) Interest rate on car loan 535:1 3.00% 3.00% $50,000 Income tax credits for hybrid, electric, and charging station 12,263 Annual GHG emissions of electricity source (lb. of CO2 equiv.) $ 5,000 Total Annual GHG emissions (lb. of CO2 equivalent) Cost of battery service assumed in year 8 12,263 $ 8,000 Miles per gallon of gasoline 28 $40,000 Miles per kilowatt-hour of electricity 3,4 Expected miles per year Is,0D0 $30,000 Annual miles from grid electricity (less or equal to above figure) Moline and electricity prices; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions rater and discount rate $20,000 tConv Gasoline (E10) price for life of car $3.05 -0 Hybri Additional cost of premium gasoline per gallon $0.25 (Affects fuel cost of a only) $10,000 Electricity price (arid) per kWh for life of car $0.0950 -Ext. I Gas engine maintenance per 3000 miles $60.84 I Personal discount rate applied to costs 3.50% $ GHG emissions per MWh of electicity (tons) 1781.44 Pounds per MWh (See ElectricGHG tab 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 GHGemission Der oallonofoasoline (El 0) 22.89 Pounds per gallon below) Years of operation Annual GHG reduction in metric tonnes per year Effective CO2 tax charged to self by owning, alternative vehicle per metric tonne $ (83.33 $ 95.08 $ 30.93 $ 46.68 $ (192.13 4,412 7,859 7,853 1.997 Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation in year 15 Ext. Range Electric $�- Electric e3g,672 j Hybrid Conventional($4. 8 $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (lb.) Ext. Range Electric - Electric 7,859 Hybrid - Conventional 12,263 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 85 Monthly car payments (if financed) $ - Monthly opportunity cost of down payment or purchase Average monthly gasoline payments$ 136.16 Average monthly engine maintenance costs $ 25.35 Average monthly electrical payments Monthly coats (ownership, fuel, engine maintenance) $ 238.80 Difference In monthly payments in first 5 years vs. conventional Annual gasoline usage (gal.) 535:1 Annual electricity usage from grid (kWh) Annual GHG emissions from gasoline usage (lb. of CO2 equiv.) 12,263 Annual GHG emissions of electricity source (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Total Annual GHG emissions (lb. of CO2 equivalent) 12,263 Annual GHG reduction in metric tonnes per year Effective CO2 tax charged to self by owning, alternative vehicle per metric tonne $ (83.33 $ 95.08 $ 30.93 $ 46.68 $ (192.13 4,412 7,859 7,853 1.997 Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation in year 15 Ext. Range Electric $�- Electric e3g,672 j Hybrid Conventional($4. 8 $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (lb.) Ext. Range Electric - Electric 7,859 Hybrid - Conventional 12,263 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 85 ACTUAL Enter appropriate values in the yellow cells. As you enter your data, note on the graph which type of vehicle has low accumulated discount costs in a particular year of operation (the lower line means cheaper). This spreadsheet is designed for sensitivity analysis—changing variables to determine the effects of these changes. Try different values in the yellow cells, such as purchase price of the vehicle and how many miles you expect to drive per year, and see what effect they have on cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This tool downloaded from the University of Minnesota Extension publication, Should I buy an alternative vehicle?, at extension.umn.edu/energy/vehicle. Cat pricing end performance assumptions nyoriO, electric, dno exienue0 range eieciric vemae5 Oy y Negotiated Purchase Price (plus charging station) $ 26,500 $ 32,600 $40,000 Down payment (if financed) or total purchase price $ 26,500 $ 32,600 Months of car loan 360 360 Interest rate on car loan 3.00% 3.00%a Income tax credits for hybrid, electric, and charging station $ s•� $30,000 Cost of battery service assumed in year 8 $ 6,435 Miles per gallon of gasoline 28 Miles per kilowatt-hour of electricity 3.9 Expected miles per year 5,760 $20,000 '.. Annual miles from grid electricity (less or equal to above figure) Gasoline and electricity prices, greenhousegas (GHG) missions rates, and discount tConvi Gasol 1 ne (E10) price for life of car $3.20 $10,000 Hybri _ _ _____________ --p- Electr Additional cost of premium gasoline per gallon $0.25 (Affects fuel cost of a only) Electricity price (grid) Der kWh for life of car $0.0120 R Gas engine maintenance per 3000 miles $60.84 --Ext. Personal discount rate applied to costs .3.50% $_ GHG emissions per MWh of eleclicity (tons) 1781.44 Pounds per MWh (See EleRricGHG tab 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 GHG emission per gallon of gasoline (El 0) 22.89 Pounds per gallon below) Years of operation Monthly car payments (if financed) Monthly opportunity cost of down payment or purchase Average monthly gasoline payments Average monthly engine maintenance costs Average monthly electrical payments Monthly costs (ownership, fuel, engine maintenance) Difference in monthly payments in first 5 years vs. conventional Annual gasoline usage (gal.) Annual electricity usage from grid (kWh) Annual GHG emissions from gasoline usage (ib. of CO2 equiv.) Annual GHG emissions of electricity source (lb. of CO2 equiv.) Total Annual GHG emissions (lb. of CO2 equivalent) Annual GHG reduction in metric tonnes per year Effective CO2 tax charged to self by owning alternative vehicle 77.29 54.86 9.73 141.98 4,709 4,709 95.08 1.48 13.23 28.66j 1,477 2,631 2,631: 0.942 Accumulated discounted costs of ownership and operation in year 15 Ext. Range Electric Electric ;i $32,8601 Hybrid Conventional I $35,427 $- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 Annual greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (lb.) Ext. Range Electric i I Electric MMWAW 2,63X Hybrid Conventional 4,7 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 51000 86 •• c r : a• • �r •. • r• a = r - ••• • rr •' • �s 24 Month Average Retail Price Chart Reguhw Gas Reguiar Gas wm(USSPG) Nm(USS'G) �.�� GAS PRICES - t�tinnesata 4.28 4.15 .. _ . : 4.15 4.01 4.01 3.87 . . 3.87 3.74 _ 3.74 3.60 3.60 3.47 3.47 3.33 3.83 3.19 _ . 3.19 3.06 3.06 {.lh i3 22 N � CD w -•� o t�')i r rn o 89 ZZ aha 2D12 2D13 2014 Data (Month/Day) D21114 G a s B, a d d _ . u � �� Historical Price Charts Quick charts: 1 Month 1 3 Month 1 6 Hoath 1 9M Year 1 18 m 2 Years 1 3 Years j 4 Years ( 5 Years 1 8 Years j 9 Years � 10 Years 1 11 gears 132 Month Average Retail Price Chart Regular Gas ReguiarGas Price (U3 SIG) Minnesota Price (US StG) 4.28 3,98 3.69 3.40 3.11 2.82 2.53 2.24 1.95 1.66 137 4.28 3.98 3.69 3.40 3.11 2.82 2.53 2.24 1.95 1.66 137 W CD j Ch CO W 0 -' W CSD j CII -+ W V y Js 0 s L h W til � A W 0 �. w N v w 0) 10 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20'12 2013 2014 Date (Month/Day) G !: � .4,44 d .# ! orn April 2014 --- ^r arch ED Electric Vehicle - Calendar(CA ►Starch October 20 - 24, 2014 ED Electric Vehicle - Calendar (Cp �_----------------__-.� e , w i - i i i E 5 am 700 Chwft llij � I I 800 90° CRY "A Chwie r Muk i Cft hw s 3 1000 (� V i r i � 00 3 12 Pm) - - - i — no - Nn 100 i 7 200 h 300 j r 400 { 92 } s � i DATE: January 8, 2015 TO: Energy and Environment Commission CC: Facility Managers FROM: Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer RE: 2014 Building Energy Report The following is a summary of City of Edina building energy use. The period of review for peer comparison, benchmark and Energy Star data is October 2013 to September 2014. Notable changes to the building stock over this period include the decommissioning of Fred Richards clubhouse, and ongoing construction of Braemar Field sports dome and "Backyard" outdoor ice rink near. The following tables summarize building energy and resulting carbon emission as recorded in the State B3 benchmarking database. (https://mn.b3benchmarkine.comThis report is only for those structures listed in the B3 database. There are a variety of parks and utility structures that and not represented here. Building Stock and Energy Use The City of Edina owns and operates over 600,000sf of building under roof in 20 buildings tracked in the B3 database. The two largest structures, the Public Works garage and Braemar Arena make up nearly % of building area. The next three largest structures, City Hall, Edinborough Park, and the Braemar Golf Dome make up the next '/4 of building area. The final 15 buildings in the B3 database make up the remaining '/4 building area, and include fire, liquor, park and special use facilities. (Figure 3) Peer Comparison and Benchmark The B3 database allows comparison between other State, county and local government buildings with similar uses. 18 of the 20 buildings operated by the City of Edina qualify for a peer rating. In 2014, 3 buildings ranked in the top 20`' percentile, with the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility at the top of its class, while 55% of buildings ranked in the bottom 20' percentile, of those 33% occupied the bottom 10' percentile. (Figure 1) Benchmark data is calculated by B3 to compare buildings to a new building built to today's energy code, for example a 1.0 benchmark would be standard for a building built today, with buildings using more energy scoring above 1.0, and those using less scoring below 1.0. (Note that State energy code lags national standards, and is proposed to change soon, likely revising the benchmark downward) The 2014 Citywide average benchmark index ratio was 1.I 5. (Figure 2) Detailed energy intensity in kBtu/SFNr, cost, carbon, kWh, and therm energy us data is available in figure 1-6. Peer ratings, and benchmark information is attached in figure 7-9. Historic 2009-2013 costs, carbon and energy use is summarized in figures 10-12. GAPMCENTRAL SVCS\ENVIRONMENT DIV\Energy\Building Energy\ 150112 Building Energy Report.docx ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov . 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 93 PEER COMPARISON Peer Comparison ism ranking of a site as compared to other sites in 83 of similar space usage. Peers are determined by hmingthe exact or similar space type usage within a ceruin tolerance. More'nfo... Sites {t a a*ZO aM an Rip1xN rw 0227 eampamon) _-__-EPrr+a.ySoace ISq are I� .,.) .. ..( .u> I_ -sae ..� a,ge AT A+ I 2 C G t I ,.r Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion J Park/Recreation 6,S00 242.93 83.220 2.92 09Artcenter J Park/Recreation 7,6'3 226.56 78.00 2.90' O"Fre Station No. 1 Tracy Ave J. Fre station 19,399 198.88 121-59 1.64 m'Edinborough Park J CommunkyCarter 42,000 274.23 119.64 229 tMM6City Hall J City Hall 59,000 171.67 101.72 1.69 �j Braemar Golf Dome ,/ Field Howse / Gym 44,018 176.55 108.06 1.63 113raemarA.rena J Ice Arena 143,168 1777.58 141.64 1.25 ON Senior Center J Park/ Recreation 17,000 127.64 76.06 1.68 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave J Fre station 5,335 128.34 121.59 _ 106 Lft Liquor Store 50th St J Retail /store 5,157 133.61 111.95 1.19 M'Liquor Store York Ave J Retail l Store 8.800 129.88 119.98 1.08 RhArneson Acres Museum J Museum SA00 97.71 199.55 0.49firm . Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse J Diring 18,935 136.06 138.63 0.98 BE Liquor Store Vernon Ave _. J Re -Ail /store 8,373 110.26 126.68 0,87 meFred Richards Golf Course Maintenance J Maintenance Repair Z787 54.55 86.00 0.63 M'PubliCWorks J, MairtenanceRepair 159:205 39.30 88.97 0.44 .Centennial Lakes Maintenance J l0airtmance Repair 16:100 22.48 86.00 0.26 _ _ MISouthMetro Public WetyTrainingFacility J Comm�nityCarter 38,000 65.75 1OZ37 0.64 ea =Arneson Acres Greenhouse Greenhouse 7,500 32.84 289.00 oJi . ffinFred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse Park/Recreation 6246 41.27 92.60 0.45 94 BENCHMARK The B3 Benchmark is an engineering model that predicts how much energy a site wauld use if it were buiR to this program's energy standard. The 63 Rating is a measurement of a site's actual consumption to its predicted benchmark. Mare Irfo.. Actual W '✓'v tom: - 73% -:::.,.- - - - ---- o .._...2b 40 50 80 100 1; Sites ±10 0!20 vasa,. tw+CH,r!ark[o+neAq) Energy Source, 1 Actual Meter Total 130.40 iB*,,sFwYear Benchmark Meter Total . . _... 113.08kPu/Sr1?wr Actual/Benchmark Index Ratio . . 1.15 tw Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Fre Station Park I Recreation 6,SCC , 242.93 83.20 2722 1,119 ' -- ---,. JhArtCenter _ Park Recreation 7,6'3 1 226.56 78.00 L90 1,220 MI'EdlnborOUgh Park _ Community Center 42,000'; 1 274.23 119.64 2.229 ',246 yr` M"City Hall _ �/ city Hall 64.00 , 171.67 10172 i,69 5,880 1 T jSenior Center */ Park I Recreation 17,000 1 127.64 76.05 ' 63 > 1,071Gw Fire Station No.1 Tracy Ave Fre Station a station 19,3x9 1 198.86 121.59 6� t,as3r _ _ Mm"Braemar Golf Dome _ Field Mouse I Gym _ 44,0'8 1 176.55 108.06 1,63 _ 3,728 , _- MBraemarArena 00 Ice Arena 143,168 1 177.58' 141.64 1.25 8,187 ]Liquor Store 50th St -,00 Retail IStore 5,157 1 133.61 111.95 1.19 198 , rMki Liquor Store York Ave -,% Retail Store 8,800 1 129.88 119.98 1.015 245 *a ? ✓^ Fre Station No. 2 York Ave OBraemar Golf Course Clubhouse �j Liquor Store Vernon Ave Wouth'Metro Public Safety I raining I-acility Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance laRArneson Acres Museum Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse &Public Works 111RCentenniai Lakes Maintenance Arneson Acres Greenhouse xi e/ Fre Station 5,3:5 1 128.34 121.59 1.06 133 y Diring 18,9:5 1 136.06 138.63 0.98 345 Retail i Store 8373 1 110.26 126.68 0.87 22 -4/ Community Center 38,000 1 65.75' 102.37 0.64 ,/ Maintenance Repair 2,7€7 1 54.55 86.00 0.63 vr 2 ti "i .0 Musaum S,000 i 97.71 199.55 0.49 %0 Park I Recreation 6,246 1 41.27 92.60 045 r 5. *4 Maintenance Repair ' 59,205 1 39.30 88.97 0.44 Maintenance Repair 6,100` 1 22.48 86.00 0.26 Greenhouse 7500 1 32.84 289.00 D.''' 95 2013 Building Area ■ Public Works ■ Braemar Arena ■ City Hall ■ Edinborough Park ■ South Metro Public Safety Training Facility ■ Braemar Golf Dome ■ Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave ■ Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse ■ Senior Center ■ Centennial Lakes Maintenance ■ Liquor Store York Ave Liquor Store Vernon Ave ■ Art Center Arneson Acres Greenhouse IM Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse ED Fire Station No. 2 York Ave El Liquor Store 50th St - Arneson Acres Museum ,.j Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 96 2013 Sum of Total Dollars ■ Public Works ■ Braemar Arena ■ City Hall ■ Edinborough Park ■ South Metro Public Safety Training Facility ■ Braemar Golf Dome ■ Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave ■ Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse ■ Senior Center ■ Centennial Lakes Maintenance ■ Liquor Store York Ave Liquor Store Vernon Ave Art Center ■Arneson Acres Greenhouse EM Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse 0 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave ® Liquor Store 50th St -Arneson Acres Museum _� Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 97 2013 Sum of Electric kWh ■ Public Works ■ Braemar Arena ■ City Hall ■ Edinborough Park ■ South Metro Public Safety Training Facility ■ Braemar Golf Dome ■ Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave ■ Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse ■ Senior Center ■ Centennial Lakes Maintenance Liquor Store York Ave ■ Liquor Store Vernon Ave Art Center Arneson Acres Greenhouse Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion ■ Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse 0 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave 0 Liquor Store 50th St `—Arneson Acres Museum Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 98 2013 Sum of Natural Gas Therms ■ Public Works ■ Braemar Arena ■ City Hall ■ Edinborough Park ■ South Metro Public Safety Training Facility ■ Braemar Golf Dome ■ Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave ■ Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse ■ Senior Center ■ Centennial Lakes Maintenance ■ Liquor Store York Ave III Liquor Store Vernon Ave Art Center ■ Arneson Acres Greenhouse Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion ■ Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse M Fire Station No. 2 York Ave ® Liquor Store 50th St Arneson Acres Museum i- Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 99 City Hall Administration Karen Kurt kkurt@edinamn.gov 69,000 6% 18 Public Works Public Works Tim Barnes tbarnes@edinamn.gov 159,205 89% 19 South Metro Public Safety Training Facility Debra Fields dfields @south metrotrai ning. 38,000 100% 16 Senior Center 17,000 14% 135 SUB OTHER 283,205 Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave Fire Tom Schmitz TSchmitz@EdinaMN.gov 19,399 3% 158 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave Fire Tom Schmitz TSchmitz@EdinaMN.gov 5,335 18% 158 SUB FIRE 24,734 Liquor Store York Ave Liquor Steve Grausam sgrausam@edinamn.gov 8,800 28% 53 Liquor Store Vernon Ave Liquor Steve Grausam sgrausam@edinamn.gov 8,373 55% 53 Liquor Store 50th St Liquor Steve Grausam sgrausam@edinamn.gov 5,157 19% 53 SUB LIQUOR 22,330 Braemar Arena Parks Susie Miller smiller@edinamn.gov 143,168 12% 82 Braemar Golf Dome Parks Josepth Abood JAbood@EdinaMN.gov 70,000 7% 15 Edinborough Park Parks Patty McGrath pmcgrath@edinamn.gov 42,000 5% 105 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Parks Josepth Abood JAbood@EdinaMN.gov 18,935 53% 17 Centennial Lakes Maintenance Parks Tom Shirley tshirley@edinamn.gov 16,100 95% 135 Art Center Parks Michael Frey mfrey@edinamn.gov 7,613 2% 135 Arneson Acres Greenhouse Parks Tim Zimmerman tzimmerman@edinamn.gov 7,500 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Parks Tom Shirley tshirley@edinamn.gov 6,500 1% 135 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhou Parks Josepth Abood JAbood@EdinaMN.gov 6,246 Arneson Acres Museum Parks Brian Olson bolson@EdinaMN.gov 5,000 47% 15 Fred Richards Golf Course Mainten Parks Josepth Abood JAbood@EdinaMN.gov 2,787 68% 135 SUB PARKS Ann Kattreh akattreh@edinamn.gov 325,849 TOTALS 656,118 100 City Hall Public Works South Metro Public Safety Training Senior Center SUB OTHER Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave Fire Station No. 2 York Ave SUB FIRE Liquor Store York Ave Liquor Store Vernon Ave Liquor Store 50th St SUB LIQUOR Braemar Arena Braemar Golf Dome Edinborough Park Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Centennial Lakes Maintenance Art Center Arneson Acres Greenhouse Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhou Arneson Acres Museum Fred Richards Golf Course Mainten SUB PARKS TOTALS 101.72 1.69 88.97 0.44 102.37 0.64 76.05 1.68 121.59 1.64 121.59 1.06 119.98 126:68 111.95 141.64 108.06 119.64 138.63 86.00 78.00 289.00 83.20 92.60 199.55 86.00 1.08 0.87 1.19 1.25 2.11 2.29 0.98 0.26 2.90 0.11 2.92 0.45 0.49 0.63 5,880 $76,437 67.59 57.17 104.09 44.55 0 $0 21.68 38.49 17.62 50.48 0 $0 22.32 42.93 43.44 59.43 1,071 $13,923 41.07 26.05 86.57 50.00 1,853 $24,090 47.23 61.59 151.65 60.00 133 $1,733 43.55 61.59 84.79 60.00 245 $3,191 85.13 67.09 44.75 52.89 22 $281 76.57 73.79 33.70 52.89 198 $2,578 96.34 59.06 37.27 52.89 8,187 $106,436 77.99 62.47 99.59 79.17 4,647 $60,408 22.67 32.23 205.78 75.83 7,246 $94,204 98.26 52.65 175.96 66.98 345 $4,486 66.84 80.95 69.22 57.68 0 $0 7.43 31.00 15.05 55.00 1,220 $15,861 65.02 28.00 161.54 50.00 0 $0 8.11 114.00 24.74 175.00 1,119 $14,551 87.34 33.20 155.59 50.00 0 $0 17.72 41.74 23.55 50.87 0 $0 16.89 113.87 `" ` 80.83 85.68 0 $0 6.84 31.00 47.71 55.00 101 Public Works 39.3 86.6 36.3 82.9 South Metro Public Safety Training 65.8 115.7 61.8 111.5 Senior Center 127.6 219.9 118.3 210.1 SUB OTHER Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave 187.8 291.1 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave 128.3 225.8 113.1 206.8 SUB FIRE Liquor Store York Ave 69 129.9 314.3 321.2 302.0 Liquor Store Vernon Ave 80 110.3 275.8 103.3 267.1 Liquor Store 50th St 76 133.6 341.6 122.8 330.3 SUB LIQUOR Braemar Arena 177.6 349.4 170.7 339.2 Braemar Golf Dome 206.1 258.6 183.2 231.3 Edinborough Park 299.3 541.7 279.9 521.7 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse 136.1 282.5 128.9 275.5 Centennial Lakes Maintenance 22.5 39.1 19.9 36.3 Art Center 226.6 373.8 214.5 361.3 Arneson Acres Greenhouse 32.8 51.4 30.5 48.9 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion 242.9 437.6 214.9 397.6 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhou 41.3 80.4 39.9 79.5 Arneson Acres Museum 97.7 137.9 89.5 129.3 Fred Richards Golf Course Mainten 54.5 71.6 47.4 64.0 SUB PARKS TOTALS 102 yw.wn u. LP YGa D 730 Row Labels 2009 2010 2011 2_012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Arneson Acres Greenhouse $3,755 $3,615 $3,693 $3,061 $4,019 55,272 52,233 48,676 45,619 54,469 Arneson Acres Museum $6,229 $6,511 $7,361 $6,031 $6,693 91,308 95,536 99,528 94,871 96,142 Art Center $22,879 $23,837 $24,014 $20,899 $26,147 368,652 385,973 382,420 360,125 382,341 Braemar Arena $300,723 $291,527 $327,624 $304,606 $406,162 6,267,771 5,723,211 6,194,730 6,028,705 7,006,753 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse $51,703 $53,513 $54,674 $51,203 $56,388 931,028 940,438- 916,349 844,623 815,743 Braemar Golf Dome $70,434 $81,351 $86,304 $31,721 $37,331 1,178,956 1,360,173 1,610,690 594,932 627,405 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion $19,010 $20,986 $21,363 $21,647 $26,859 317,765 348,390 344,123 365,518 414,754 Centennial Lakes Maintenance $5,137 $5,668 $6,213 $5,941 $6,404 75,270 83,521 90,673 91,742 87,924 City Hall $133,160 $141,661 $140,441 $129,417 $151,646 2,948,834 2,998,347 2,903,645 2,899,609 2,988,893 Edinborough Park $144,346 $161,806 $164,652 $150,661 $176,177 2,887,330 3,059,338 3,037,720 2,942,243 3,075,458 Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave $40,927 $39,838 $41,220 $34,976 $43,931 794,888 769,064 784,034 721,442 777,666 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave $6,843 $9,597 $9,776 $7,850 $10,216 114,250 166,508 161,963 138,316 156,497 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse $5,086 $5,674 $5,980 $5,692 $6,002 76,275 85,181 86,615 84,919 79,201 Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance $2,014 $1,936 $1,927 $1,656 $2,060 27,545 26,267 26,094 23,224 26,505 Liquor Store 50th St $12,923 $12,974 $13,119 $13,762 $14,011 263,804 258,606 240,837 253,192 231,695 Liquor Store Vernon Ave $16,820 $18,139 $18,713 $17,619 $20,306 340,503 361,360 356,727 339,544 351,937 Liquor Store York Ave $19,893 $22,742 $23,684 $22,111 $25,909 396,380 447,734 437,695 383,909 415,206 Public Works $36,704 $124,090 $126,169 $112,592 $134,644- 507,962 1,940,384 2,056,505 1,976,668 2,039,456 Senior Center $33,891 $30,945 $35,435 $33,906 $34,645 '' 601,295 503,554 591,957 616,670 511,096 South Metro Public Safety Training Facility $39,031 $43,220 $41,801 $41,935 $45,291 553,205 613,836 599,069 648,123 616,014 Grand Total $971,509 $1,099,630 $1,154,162 $1,017,284 $1,234,842######## ######## ######## ######## ######## 103 Row Labels 3 2009 a, 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Arneson Acres Greenhouse 19,541 20,169 17,687 19,072 20,036 1,832 1,479 1,542 1,076 1,690 Arneson Acres Museum 28,374 33,088 35,516 33,524 29,395 3,604 3,268 3,250 3,147 3,866 Art Center 147,093 154,492 148,297 142,913 144,265 9,737 10,122 10,735 9,627 11,325 Braemar Arena 2,794,518 2,431,045 2,747,858 2,730,580 3,093,764 122,077 129,332 122,740 111,108 140,944 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse 468,587 471,333 452,885 423,633 390,447 10,217 10,615 11,287 9,486 11,930 Braemar Golf Dome 162,133 164,928 191,889 37,548 88,596 76,766 91,840 109,261 45,290 40,682 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion 128,379 145,381 136,000 153,734 169,797 8,157 8,258 9,282 8,486 10,316 Centennial Lakes Maintenance 29,208 35,587 33,257 34,302 35,555 2,110 1,871 2,827 2,764 2,252 City Hall 1,319,462 1,334,224 1,271,644 1,266,410 1,258,209 56,737 58,784 59,952 60,382 69,227 Edinborough Park 1,383,933 1,406,758 1,342,886 1,362,876 1,356,047 41,938 53,261 60,867 49,748 62,144 Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave 289,496 290,518 277,802 260,214 251,795 25,089 22,731 25,892 23,146 29,197 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave 42,655 75,680 69,646 62,130 64,898 3,451 3,030 3,534 2,626 3,770 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse 34,151 40,710 40,496 40,336 36,023 1,464 1,255 1,409 1,288 1,437 Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 8,489 8,194 7,717 7,427 7,318 1,098 1,032 1,088 886 1,182 Liquor Store 50th St 145,054 145,378 132,982 142,792 125,549 1,077 585 901 505 1,220 Liquor Store Vernon Ave 183,454 195,379 191,849 184,150 186,488 1,949 1,967 2,093 1,764 2,477 Liquor Store York Ave 219,880 245,505 239,751 204,442 215,664 1,333 1,930 1,923 2,552 3,566 Public Works 0 624,409 1,032,297 1,020,415 1,008,480 43,414 73,422 22,975 17,910 25,043 Senior Center 243,019 207,705 238,334 253,590 196,283 15,422 12,295 15,318 15,172 14,630 South Metro Public Safety Training Facility 222,019 250,313 243,522 293,699 256,306 14,420 15,414 15,158 11,923 14,714 Grand Total 7,869,447 8,280,796 8,852,315 8,673,787 8,934,914 441,893 502,491 482,035 378,885 104 i Row Labels co H a V 0 t Y H VA E d F H Arneson Acres Greenhouse 18,142 256,268 96,506 7,619 Arneson Acres Museum 32,825 477,384 159,898 17,135 Art Center 117,776 1,879,512 737,060 51,546 Braemar Arena 1,630,642 31,221,169 13,797,764 626,200 Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse 267,480 4,448,181 2,206,885 53,536 Braemar Golf Dome 307,141 5,372,156 645,094 363,839 Centennial Lakes Hughes Pavilion 109,865 1,790,551 733,291 44,500 Centennial Lakes Maintenance 29,363 429,130 167,909 11,825 City Hall 696,324 14,739,326 6,449,948 305,082 Edinborough Park 797,642 15,002,089 `-6,852,500 267,958 Fire Station No. 1 Tracy Ave 200,893 3,847,095 1,369,825 126,055 Fire Station No. 2 York Ave 44,282 737,535 315,010 16,411 Fred Richards Golf Course Clubhouse 28,434 412,191 191,717 6,853 Fred Richards Golf Course Maintenance 9,592 129,634 39,146 5,286 Liquor Store 50th St 66,789 1,248,134 691,754 4,289 Liquor Store Vernon Ave 91,597 1,750,071 941,320 10,250 Liquor Store York Ave 114,340 2,080,924 1,125,243 11,305 Public Works 534,199 8,520,975 3,685,600 182,764 Senior Center 168,821 2,824,572 1,138,930 72,837 South Metro Public Safety Training Facility 211,278 3,030,247 1,265,859 71,629 Grand Total 5,477,426 100,197,142 42,611,259 2,256,918 105 ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION 2015 Annual Work Plan Approved by City Council on 12/16 with following notes: Certain items are not included in the approved budget. Projects that involve considerable staff time may need to span two calendar years. Suggest that prioritization be considered during upcoming joint meeting. Reduce Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) in City of Edina Operations to meet Comprehensive Plan Chapter 10 Goals. 1) Measurement — continue to use and refine metrics and analyses a. B3 database for all City Buildings b. Create metrics for City vehicle fleets(gallons of fuel) c. Create metrics for Utility operations (energy usage) d. Regional Indicators for City as a whole 2) City Building Energy Efficiency initiative a. EEC Commissioners to work with City Manager and City Building manager to create a detailed plan for retrofitting existing buildings within 5 years b. At least one building will be retrofitted in 2015 either under the City's own effort or under the State GESP program 3) City Capital Process Environmental Considerations Initiative a. EEC to review results of having an environmental considerations section in 2014 CIP process. EEC commissioners will work with City staff to refine and expand so that all capital decisions (i.e., new buildings, major building renovations and fleet purchases) have explicitly environmental analvsis on how thev will affect Citv GHG April 1, 2015 Staff Time Tim Barnes (12hrs) July 1, 2015 Staff Time Gunnar Kaasa (20hrs) July 1, 2015 Staff Time Dave Goergen (20hrs) April 1, 2015 $500 (Consultant) October 1, Staff + $1,000 Scott Neal (8hrs) 2015 (Consultant) Tim Barnes (80hrs) December 31, Staff + $10,000 Tim Barnes (200hrs) 2015 (Consultant) April 1, 2015 Staff Time Eric Roggeman (20hrs) 106 ..................... commitments Progress Report: ... New Initiative Target Budget2015 Workplan Item 2 (WP2) Completion Required Required Approval Date Promote the Reduction of Energy Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) in the City of Edina at large to meet Comprehensive Plan Chapter 10 Goals. 1) Community solar project�,��� a. City will allocate staff time to scope, bid and execute a December 31, Staff + $10,000 Ross Bintner (100hrs) community solar project on a city building in 2015 once PUC 2015 (Consultant) finalizes community solar details. Public Works roof is initial target site. b. EEC commissioners will work with the City staff on this effort c. The City will determine whether it wishes to purchase a share in this project for itself d. The April 2015 EEC community event will be used to roll out April 1, 2015 Staff Time Krystal Caron (80hrs) Community Solar to residents 2) EEC coordination with Planning, Transportation and Parks commissions to achieve Chapter 10 commitments a. EEC commissioners will be encouraged to track these December 31, None None commission meetings and to comment and recommend 2015 actions per the City's commitments-, 3) Expand City subsidized Home Energy Squad (HES) installs for residents a. The City will fund 150 HES installs at a cost of $10500, December 31, $10,500 Minor prioritize for lower income (a dramatic increase over the 2015 (Consultant) current funding of $4000) b. EEC will educate and promote HES with the goal to get 500 visits in the year. Progress Report: 107 Ongoing Responsibilities Green Step Cities Reporting — review ongoing activities in GreenSteps program. Urban Forestry — track progress through Parks and Planning Commissions, review final product. Solid Waste and Recycling—track MPCA compost rulemaking and emerald ash borer quarantine changes. Annual Purchasing Policy Report — review ongoing purchasing activities. Business Recycling —track progress Local Food Task Force — track progress Other Work Plan Ideas Considered for Current Year or Future Years Proposed Month for Joint Work Session: , January, August 108 2015 EEC Workplan preface Whereas the City of Edina is forward looking with respect to energy and environmental matters; and Whereas the City of Edina is committed to significant GHG emission reductions of 15% below 2007 levels by 2015; and Whereas the City of Edina is committed to GHG emission reductions of 30% below 2007 levels by 2025; and Whereas the City of Edina is committed to GHG emission reductions of 80% below 2007 levels by 2050, the EEC recommends the following course of action to attain or exceed those goals: 109 Business Recipients of Hennepin County Recycling and Composting Grants in Edina Environmental partners: The Hennepin County Environmental Partners program recognizes businesses for their efforts to recycle and divert organic waste, which includes food scraps Business name Address Edina Cinema 3911 West 50th St, Edina, MN, 55424 Edina Grill 5028 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 Salut 5032 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 110 Grant Business name Round Address Address 2 50th & France Fall 2013 3925 W 50th St, B100 Edina, MN 55424 International Dairy Queen Fall 2013 7505 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Minnesota Lice Lady Fall 2014 3940 Sunnyside Rd Edina, MN 55424 Environmental partners: The Hennepin County Environmental Partners program recognizes businesses for their efforts to recycle and divert organic waste, which includes food scraps Business name Address Edina Cinema 3911 West 50th St, Edina, MN, 55424 Edina Grill 5028 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 Salut 5032 France Ave S, Edina MN, 55424 110 Business recycling The commercial sector generates more than half of the total waste in Hennepin County, and nearly two-thirds of the waste created at businesses and non -profits is recyclable. Having a strong recycling program conserves natural resources and reduces greenhouse gas emissions, can help your bottom line, and demonstrates your organization's commitment to sustainability and the community. Hennepin County offers grants, signage, technical assistance and case studies to help business and organizations start or improve recycling programs. Grant funding are available again in 2015. Please contact Andre Xiong at andre.x.xiong@hennepin.us or 612- 543-1316 to discuss business recycling grant project ideas and future funding opportunities. ME Recently awarded grants 112 Clean, Carbon -Frog n a Program 7 P.m. "eynote Speaker Meteorologist & Entrepreneur Paul Douglas Also Featuring Northfield Area Community Solar Co -Chair Erica Zweifel Presentations from Edina Student Environment readership Council �r e �f ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT o`,' COMMISSION Biking & Carpooling Encouraged • FREE Admission www.EdinaMN.gov 113 Fran: Gubrud Robert Te: 0.os<Bint•er U: Thommes ]adv —J-- HES Report: EEC MarcM1 12 TekNsed matlip Date: rtlursday, Marty a5, 20151:0):99 FM •L4slrma:K Summary Table. Hov. S. Ros, Here an the visuals Pd like to use in my HES report. The Nov. 5, 2014 EES summary table is a cut and paste and not up b date, so itis here as an example only. It may have to be enlarged. Judy is working on ao updated version which I will forward az e replacement. Please let me know iCthe visuals me acceptable b use, and Knot, how m provide m a usable foment ]hanks, Bob ENERGY VINE DE VERS TO YOUR DOOR TF-P Imprwmg energy efficiency. one house at a bene n.a,m.r,.yy sa�aal.aiwmc�w•+m.ee.aer erw c„ear er a.r r„� t,arc.. R�-.^.x;'^yq. Tg,�g4:;. MaEe EaIERDY SDYND it G, 9a ®«.w„•�. ..., ()SaaFragr �� 114 NOW BIRCY SOUP ENMWP- $50 .4 �n-i 11 ft TME HOW ENERGY SOUAC ENHANCED VISIT OLALWV� YOU FOR CEE'S ZV^ ENERGY FINANCING AND UTAK R W, ES TO SCHEDULE YOUR VISIT CA" 512335-5874 OR V;.',IT Mf YEE.0QC,HE5-EO]NA Fv—,F T 7s 7gi 115 City Discounts Home Energy Squad Visits For Residents y Y�wK'+e i 1101a arr F)E Hu Re1M)Ipe4MeYa4f)apM[Yepa Ylewe FenOr bd w � en ewer ber w4o.e ar InM.W e�p•raF)peaea A...�ron.e Ma J,r+),nurrj J.wxr, pre WvwdarRinq nolev enp pre ♦d1 u.0 epinp n Ka Ivn b tlad ehwa Fep^tl ed+4. pv rieaa awlvWinp pwr IbaK awe.e�dmub4� •&firrc T'w MurF ner Y^e'°rW""p <apn enl.wwtrn. M dr I4ere fmP,r SflM M Tw laww• rcme To Mlp pW y—M rcepv 4w rzlmrc, rhe Fdiea Fn 4 Fnvvree.m Cummt.+:o»mpFh� tkanr Fxrp) SquW FvpwrcN vhlh rvip�kb dA. nn4Ln. e dW nmtl rercW CU [MMptlr l4me.Fa.npy FhenN M r+cp,nham WUaiMd poWwpenie HUhNpyw Wrnaty ryry+pmntiMcaw �ayurr h.m• awNMaW vMklwenngg ryry pars. 'AW mty wpl. tlh•9 Wve Tru wk6amadmaFbrhh:e vi'F pFM evey. tiou. ewa.A werpy awrnviunn+ip: • Mhz blot.w. l"'Pfwmmd.Y•eMm.sw, cawpai � FFA+ISM). k�eki.renyilnv.crfio�k W InuM enuw.. Far4ae a I4nwe 4w kw ew uiraaue. rav leer Aw kMe Gwup4M. m bmppama I^rP+v)�e. P.rfe,er..4ay d.a„n y.,.,ww, trc.aes.y.a� W waa+Mna. MMrnipl9+pr4proel veyr mrew. rP ln.Mrlwoh• Prcn44 Wuomw hap Pernnf nn*EI'5�ssnirK wml utltily IeMha. 'ri1•. a.mro Mip Mrwrvnenugmee tllr N&i.mry W tlrir hoe.. eai uw nanny m apiilybp&;a k4xm Fncrp) Sgoep Fwd r wu wp3 poAr'+Ow," nW Wp lhA., Clxu W tlK EM{y 4 Fer�nwrmml Cunwlxmiun. Mee—IIS.—bnxA ,hvre Bawdy -0p pw4 hum.hAd �� ~w�..on rve I�4m�n pin vhe e iwk wawa egnrmrerle eudr m tauNbn ek Balaµ >b Meng q,wio upgak. m �+vµ evm nhve l.G .L- atbµ.!oe.pen WIv,.p—±, w -P t — 0.ob herd, FJaNIXaMrMtRI. "Tim 32 • A U T U PI N 2 0 1 3 116