Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 04-13 Planning Commission Meeting Packets NovusAGENDA Page 1 of 2 CLOSE Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, April 13, 2016 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. PLanning Commission Minutes, March 23, 2016 V. Public Hearings A. PUBLIC HEARING: Site Plan Review with Variances and Subdivision; 6600 York Avenue, Noble Investments B. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - Ordinance "Clean Up" VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Add Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning Designation to the Wooddale Bridge B. Sketch Plan Review - 4528 & 4530 France Avenue VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments http://edina.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/MeetingView.aspx?MeetinglD=245&Minutes... 4/13/2016 NovusAGENDA Page 2 of 2 XI. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. http://edina.novusagenda.com/agendapublic/Meeting View.aspx?MeetinglD=245&Minutes... 4/13/2016 f ,ffaT �' o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT •rNCOR 8) Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague April 13, 2016 V.A. Community Development Director INFORMATION/BACKGROUND Project Description Noble Investments is proposing to develop the northeast corner of Southdale. The specific request is to construct a four-story, 146-room Hilton Hotel. The hotel is described by the applicant as upscale with an extensive guest amenity package such as an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, meeting rooms and a large gathering room called The Lodge, where hot breakfast is served. The site exists today as an overflow parking lot and storage area. (See property location on pages A1—A5, and the narrative and plans on pages A7-A41 .) The primary vehicle entrance to the site would be off the Southdale interior ring road. There would be no additional curb cuts onto 66th Street or York Avenue. A boulevard style pedestrian sidewalk is proposed along 66th Street and York Avenue, with pedestrian connections proposed from the hotel to Southdale. These sidewalks would provide connections from the new development on the Best Buy site (Gateway Pointe) to the east, and the new development to the north (Millennium at Southdale) to Southdale. (See page A26a ) There would be an added 43,995 square feet of green space compared to existing conditions. To accommodate the request the following is required: > A site plan review with building setback variances from 48 to 14-24 feet on York and 48 to 21 to 46 feet for the new structure; a parking stall setback variance from 20 to 7 feet; and a parking stall variance for the entire Southdale site. ➢ Subdivision to create a new lot on which the building would be located. This project is somewhat different from previous developments proposed and considered in the Southdale area in that the proposed use is allowed within this zoning district. No rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment is required. The France Avenue/Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant, even though there is no rezoning required for this request. The applicant has responded to the Principles, and said response is attached as part of the applicant's narrative on pages A9-Al2. The primary issue for the Planning Commission on this proposal is: Are the variances justified to allow the building to be pulled up closer to the street to prevent the parking lot to be located adjacent to the street? The variance criteria would be the primary regulatory review tool for the Commission to use in this instance. The Principles may also be used as a secondary tool to support the variance criteria. The applicant did go through a sketch plan review for the proposed projects. The applicant has indicated that the following changes have been made to address issues raised during the sketch plan review: ➢ Moved the building 10' south and redesigned the east building wing to move it 10' west to create more green space between the building and the street curb, establishing a meandering sidewalk experience in the public realm for pedestrians. ➢ Substantially increased the landscaping on the north and east sides of the building to create a more walkable experience for the pedestrian. Use of plant material to establish a sense of safety for the pedestrian from the street traffic. ➢ Use of gabion walls at the guestroom patio's as a landscape feature to make patios more engaged with the public realm while maintaining guest security. ➢ Added architectural features to the north elevation of the building that fronts 66th street to have a more consistent design theme with the east elevation and center elevation. ➢ Made a sidewalk connection from the south parking lot to the NW corner of the site. ➢ Reduced the parking spaces from 147 to 121 to create more green space at the frontage road so the sidewalk experience could be meandered like it is around the building. Substantially increased the landscaping to provide a sense of safety for pedestrians from the frontage road traffic. ➢ Added 6 feet to the sidewalk island connection from the site to the Center entrance to add shrub landscaping and green space to this experience. ➢ Added more storefront glass to the south building entrance to make it more reflect the north entrance. ➢ Substantially increased the landscaping adjacent to the south building edges to more reflect the landscaping along the north and east edges of the building. 2 ➢• Made the traffic on the frontage road two-way traffic instead of one way headed east only. An additional change that was not talked about at the sketch plan, but was necessitated by engineering is the elimination of the storm water pond. The applicant's engineer, Kimley-Horn, determined they could not meet watershed district design standards with the physical size and grades so the pond was eliminated and additional under pavement storage and treatment added. To offset the change, the applicant added a more formal water feature in front of the north entrance to the building that they feel enhances not only the character of the building but also the pedestrian experience within the public realm at this corner of the site. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office buildings and the future site of the Millennium at Southdale, high density apartments; zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Easterly: Gateway Pointe high density apartments; zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Southerly: Southdale One high density apartments; zoned PCD, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. • Westerly: Retail uses: zoned PCD, Planned Commercial District and guided CAC, Community Activity Center. Existing Site Features The subject site is currently a paved overflow parking lot for Southdale. There is an existing overflow parking easement for the adjacent Metro Transit facility. This easement would bere-located to an the Metrdjacent o Transit facility. This t for JC Penney, which would actually E: overflow parking area has been very rarely used. (See page A44.) Planning Guide Plan designation: CAC, Community Activity Center Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District 3 Compliance Table City Standard PCD-3 Proposed Building Setbacks Front Street—York Ave. 48 feet 14-24 feet—Building* NA 14 feet-Porch* Front Street-66th Street 48 feet 21-46 feet—Building* NA 21-38 feet-Porch* Parking Lot Setback 20 7 feet* Building Height 12 stories 4 stories Maximum Floor Area 1.0 of the tract .46 of the tract Ratio(FAR) Tract size=80.4 acres or 3,499,610 s.f. Gross s.f.=1,628,335 s.f. (total—existing and proposed) 106,060 s.f. (proposed) Parking Stalls (Site) 160—Based on 150 units and 10 148 stalls employees on a maximum shift Parking Stalls(Southdale) 6,907 spaces(based on 1,194,731 6,297 spaces* square feet of retail,1,957 seats of restaurant,3,447 seats of theater,232 units of apartments, and a 146 room hotel Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance Required Grading/Drainage/Utilities The applicant could not meet the watershed district requirements with the previously proposed pond that was located south of the hotel. Therefore, they have revised the plans to include an underground storage facility under the parking lot. A fountain/pond has been proposed at the street corner as an amenity feature. (See pages A26 and A35.) The city engineer has reviewed the proposed utilities and grading and drainage plans and found them to be acceptable. (See the city engineer's comments on pages A46—A47.) A condition of approval should include meeting all of the conditions outlined in 4 the city engineer's memo. A permit would also be required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Site Access, Traffic & Parking Study There would be no change in access to the site. As recommended by the City Council, staff explored the potential of closing the free-right turn from 66th to York. Unlike the corners across from this site, the County is unwilling to eliminate the free right due to the heavy traffic volumes that exist in that location. WSB and Associates conducted a parking and traffic study. (See the attached study on pages A48—A75.) The study concludes that the proposed development could be supported by the existing adjacent roadways and there would be adequate parking provided. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed site development. (See pages A74-A75 of the study.) Sidewalk Connections & Bike Facilities The following are the City Code standards for requiring sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities: Sec. 36-1274. Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a site plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. 5 (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Non-residential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant is proposing to provide a boulevard style sidewalk along 66th and York, as recommended in the sketch plan review. A sidewalk easement should be provided over the sidewalk. (See engineering memo on pages A46- A47.) The applicant has also provided the crosswalk connection to Southdale with a green space buffer from the drive-aisle. (See page A26a.) In addition to the site plan request, the applicant is requesting a variance to bring the building up closer to the street to create a more pedestrian friendly development, rather than having a parking lot in between the building and adjacent roads. The proposed green space setback from the curb to the building would be 40-48 feet on 66th Street, and between 33-37 feet along York. Sidewalks would have an 8-20 foot green space buffer from the street. (See page A27.) The applicant will provide bike racks near the south entrance to the building. Minimum code requirement for the number of bicycle spaces within the rack would be eight. Parking WSB conducted a parking study that concludes that Southdale would have adequate parking, despite the parking stalls being removed to provide for the development. (See page A48—A75.) The required number of parking stalls is 6 based on the uses and square footage of all the buildings on the 80 acre Southdale Tract; therefore the City Code requires 6,907 stalls. The site plan demonstrates 6,297 parking stalls. A variance of 610 stalls is requested. Based on information from the (ITE) Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, the WSB traffic study concludes that 6,127 parking spaces are adequate to support Southdale. Therefore, there would be an excess of 170 stalls at Southdale. Previously a 759 stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2001, when the restaurants were added on to Southdale. (See pages A76—A78.) Additionally a 305 parking stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2012, when Southdale One apartments were built. The parking stall shortage at Southdale has not been a problem over the past 10+ years. The existing parking stalls have suited Southdale well over the years. If the shortage of parking were ever to be a problem at Southdale, a structured parking ramp could always be added. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 27 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing 62 new overstory trees to be planted on the site, with hundreds of understory plantings. (See pages A37-A38.) Building Design The new building would be constructed with a combination of stone, rock face block, stucco and metal coping. (See building elevations on pages A15-A24.) Subdivision/Park Dedication The applicant is proposing a subdivision to create a new lot on which the proposed hotel would sit. There are no minimum lot size requirements in the PCD-3 Zoning District. Per Section 32-200 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate $7,100 per buildable acre on the new lot. The site is 2.6 acres in size, therefore, park dedication of $18,460 will be required at the time of final plat. Variance — Building Setback Per the Zoning Ordinance,ent of the Ordinance granted e wou d cause practical difficulties found that the enfonforcem in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: 7 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable. It makes for a more efficient use of the site. The building is moved closer to the street, boulevard-style sidewalks are provided with patio areas out in front of the building surrounded by landscaping, and the parking field is further away. The practical difficulty is cause by the unique triangular shape of the property with two street fronts on the two "long sides" of the site. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback; however, Section 36-618.(3) of the City Code states that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing a boulevard-style sidewalk along 66th Street and York Avenue, and has provided sidewalk connection from that sidewalk to the building and to Southdale. (See page A26a.) The proposed green space setback from the curb to the building would be 40-48 feet on 66th Street, and between 33-37 feet along York. Sidewalks would have an 8-20 foot green space buffer from the street. (See page A27.) A significant door is provided at the intersection of 66th and York. This is the best example of a front door connection to the street and front sidewalk that Edina has seen recent years. From the intersection, the large glass entry provides a visual Gateway through to the Southdale. The proposal is a vast improvement over existing conditions on the site. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district given its unique triangular shape adjacent to streets on the two long sides, and the Southdale ring road on the third side. 8 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed building would not alter the character of the neighborhood. The existing site contains a parking lot used mainly for snow storage and storage of equipment. The proposed new building would bring activity to the site, and a more pedestrian friendly with the building brought up to the street of thih in s intersection to e back away from France Avenue. This would be the t rd corner be redeveloped. Variance — Parking Stalls Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three coMinnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed usereasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed parking stall variance Is reasonable. A the City Code equ reldg study was conducted by WSB that concludes that parking is not necessary for the site. The study concludes that the current site functions with an overage of 170 stalls. (See page A72 of the parking study.) The required number of parking stalls is based on the uses and square footage of all the buildings on the 80 acre Southdale Tract. Therefore, the City Code requires 6,907 stalls; the site plan demonstrates 6,297 parking stalls. A variance of 610 stalls is requested. Based on information from the (ITE) Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, the WSB traffic study concludes that 6,127 parking spaces are adequate to support Southdale. Therefore, there would be an excess of 170 stalls at Southdale. 9 Previously a 759 stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2001, when the restaurants were added on to Southdale. (See pages A76—A78.) Additionally a 305 parking stall variance was granted to Southdale in 2012, when Southdale One apartments were built. The parking stall shortage at Southdale has not been a problem over the past 10+ years. The existing parking stalls have suited Southdale well over the years. If the shortage of parking were ever to be a problem at Southdale, a structured parking ramp could always be added. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. Again, the City would rather see green space and development rather than large parking lots that are not needed. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Based on the parking study done by WSB, this parking would not be needed PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed building setback variance reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed building setback is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The intent of City Code Section 36-618.(3) is met. The intent of the ordinance to encourage setback requirement exceptions is to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment, rather than having buildings located away from the street with a parking lot in front. The applicant has met the intent of the code by providing boulevard-style sidewalks along 66t" and York, provided sidewalk connections from the street to the building, a main entrance off the street, provided pedestrian street crossings, added patios in front of the building, and located parking behind the building. The proposed green space setback from the curb to the 10 building would be 40-48 feet on 66th Street, and between 33-37 feet along York. Sidewalks would have an 8-20 foot green space buffer from the street. (See page A27.) 2. As highlighted above, the variance criteria are met. The practical difficulty is caused by the unique triangular shape of the property with two street fronts on the two "long sides" of the site. The request is reasonable, the building could be located on the site to meet the required setback, but would encourage parking to be located in front of the building on 66th Street and York Avenue. 3. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 4. The main entrance is located toward the intersection of 66th and York with a sidewalk connection from the boulevard sidewalk. There would be additional entrances on 66th and York. (See page A26a.) 5. The proposal is a vast improvement over existing conditions on the site. • Is the proposed parking space variance reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed parking space variance is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. As highlighted above, the variance criteria are met. 2. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the study, 6127 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,297 spaces. 3. In 2001, a variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls. Over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. 4. A 305 stall parking variance was also granted to Southdale in 2012, when Southdale One apartments were built. 5. The City of Edina does not wish to require unnecessary paving or parking structures for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 11 6. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district. it is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 7. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Staff Recommendation Site Plan with Variances Recommend that the City Council approve the site plan review with building setback variances from 48 to 14-24 feet for the new structure; a parking stall setback variance from 20 to 7 feet; and a parking stall variance of 610 stalls the entire Southdale site. El Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the setbacks and parking space variances. 2. The findings for a variance are met. The practical difficulty is cause by the unique triangular shape of the property with two street fronts on the two "long sides" of the site. 3. The intent of City Code Section 36-618.(3) is met. The intent of the ordinance to encourage setback requirement exceptions is to create an active pedestrian and streetscape environment, rather than having buildings located away from the street with a parking lot in front. The applicant has met the intent of the code by providing boulevard style sidewalks along 66th and York, provided sidewalk connections from the street to the building, a main entrance off the street, provided pedestrian street crossings, added patios in front of the building, and located parking behind the building. 4. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 5. The main entrance is located toward the intersection of 66th and York with a sidewalk connection from the boulevard sidewalk. There would be additional entrances on 66th and York. 6. The parking study done by WSB Associates concludes that the City Code required parking is not necessary for the Southdale site. Based on the 12 study, 6127 stalls are adequate for the site. The proposed development would provide 6,297 spaces. 7. In 2001, a variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls. Over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code required parking. 8. A 305 stall parking variance was also granted to Southd ale in 2012, when Southdale One apartments were built. 9. The City of Edina does not wish to require unnecessary paving or parking structures for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 10. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Approval of the Site Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Grading plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Landscaping plan date stamped February 29, 2016. • Building elevations date stamped February 29, 2016. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one- half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 13 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated April 6, 2016. 6. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 7. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Subdivision Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed subdivision to create a new lot for the proposed hotel at Southdale. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Park Dedication fee of$18,460 will be required at the time of final plat. Deadline for a city decision: May 17, 2016 14 Hennepin Interactive Property Maps Map ! x _ o Ill._ i LAthStreet i.'est 1 , {� I I o i th Street'Nest u + 1 Il f ' 1 1..- t� 1 [.5fh Street West 1 v ,° Sheridan i s i l — I i 1 t=- I 51 't Vii! 5"uthdbie CJi _I ;,[1:1..i. --- 1 I• ik } CP ( 1 i' _—I —__' m _:::::::::=' 11 11 c l--.i �' .1 m- .-.- --�.z-,::ram..,,F:- �__ __ t� � I I r 1'rt --ice ." 1 ! — 1 } 1; 1 t; t E I - �, l Lane. '•; �__ i j ll t a:- - a Ii Southdale ( ( i_ i AJ ry fl ` ! } 1 t t - 11 — — r i rvlce Cerate 3veth Dlr.,: r ParcelMap Scale:1"=800 ft. N A-T-B: -T-B: ID: /� Print • Date:1/7/2016 -(`�N- Owner Market Southdale Center LIG Name: Total: Parcel Tax Address: Total: Property Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished"AS IS"with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Date: implied,including fitness of any particular stead: purpose,merchantability,or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale • Area: Code: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 ----------------- — — " Tirink•Green! A 4 _..-...__-__.____...._____.__-_ .33..3 1 Interactive Hennepin Property Maps Map 65414 24 ;" C5 `- -. 24 ,400 24 3330 1 3316 3250 6c7_ H '42 + 1 1 Soutidale Center til 310 .i 3240 I ([1ufhddlC Circ!c. 3220 3230 1 200 i h 100 £' • l I 1 6600 ! 300 fi .6755` 6775 y f ----.. (',7L" 6803 i 124i 24 6805 6£00 1 6825 _2323.! 1. E.900 3460 i 9,_': 3501 3460 1 1 i 1 6905 I 3121 Parcel 29-028-24-32-0012 A-T-B: Map Scale:1"=400 ft. N ID: Print Date: 1/7/2016 Owner Southdale Center LIc Market Name: Total: Parcel 10 Southdale Ctr j Tax Address: Edina,MN 55435 Total: Property I Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished"AS IS"with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: implied,including fitness of any particular purpose,merchantability,or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale Area: Code: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 2222 2222--— A Thint:Green! A:),. 16. 1 i 1 aryr Property e rt y Hennepin Interactive Map IR: :-'1,...0...-'6-41-----rk*P—' �' . 9ii r, e , Ig { i ti', , . a,' ^ . v' xa ne1 . A 40,tom• :F'1 7 1 rt l` -r; , 11 _r '' id -- - % ' 10 - ,"te r �t r$�_ • Ry j ++ii J 4 ...:P# •VV-1 a ky r v -n t 7 . V' ` * apt 1 °4� 11 3 r yr ff R- ' e Y J.1.F"tI1( 3I :till cle ,M , „r t �1gi a a ° t 4 tf . •li ',i I, 11 ia) . , t --J r r ..,:,..12__,_ — ' Parcel Map Scale. 1"=100 ft. N 29-028-24-31-0005 1 A-T-B: ID: Print Date: 1/7/2016 Owner Market Name: Total: Parcel Tax Address: — Total: Property Sale T e: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various Yp sources and is furnished"AS IS with no Home- Sale repretwreeed implied,senincluding ationor fitnessarofanty any particula stead: Date: ,merchantability,or thexpraccuracyssorr and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale COPYRIGHT©HENNEPINCOUNTY 2016 • Area: : Code: — #,COUThinf:'Green! I 43 Hennepin Interactive Property Maps _ „i. II D �C rj i, -Hi 1i a 11A_. y , ,A%, �' l �-1 lJ V r+ - s �' S .f� Cil.- I _ ,e� " i �"' �" _ 8 2 I ' � ?F*PFxoles Y�-vR-H -- .yRjea,., I __---;'.„.1i. -I- 'r y�+V. ._':-.;if . .:y'- 1 r• � • I' �.M • .- is I ., s: i :lt y ;.'vy �•'�" _ L# A � 'b7� 'll��7 t ,i' .`,+ � ;� __ -:,;1L-,,—.,--7—,,347.,„ (61' �hli " f • ' 1 • / I: it'i. • - t I ,. ''... 3'.. ' i '9'-i."'. :-..----u ,,,,ifiv.-x7:74,,77,....r•.--,, , ,11 1 , ,, 47-:-- '4. ::;1111 1 . - . ' '`. ' i .;,,,..."1-. -1-- I so !1\:,"-!Cr''''.1,1.'''''.' , ,I _. 9*' L;. }.% ? .- `,t1 ,1C: —� ' - .',.,.#1.`,4; x rr.i _ rt. �� f -v^ • jt r . a r - t Lf 1 • 7.. zill��' I % - ,' EF- r • #rs f ---: F "Zi I �� 1 . 1r _ PPP t , 1 r LI .,.:=144.---7,-.':;-';;;;;7"----1 , 1 d .1 t ," f i 1 ., . .. fiL Parcel ID:I 29-028-24-31-0005 A-T-B: Map Scale:1"=100 ft. N Print Date: 1/7/2016 Owner Market Name. Total: Parcel Tax : I Address: - Total: - Property _ . Sale Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished"AS IS"with no Home- Sale representation or warranty expressed or Stead: ; Date: implied,including fitness of any particular purpose,merchantability,or the accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel Sale Area: Code: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 — - — , Think'Greeni 7� J'r- 1 II. • 0 Ci\ - . c"--" ..-------1.4.--......0.4,..w....* PROPOSED PATIOS, - '-' - ------:--.L;-:----•''''-",-._,,--''.7-..,,, - .--1----- ' . • :r (Th 3111A0111 - 1 - ri.1,-23:-.J.---Z, l---•-• ' , ....5-- --..---.........m. I ' • ..... .,..7`..>. .' P . . - a a , .--.I.Por'w-C-••,.•••••77‘.°7'.7,0"---Nr.or'- ' -7.,:- Vir -,..-7'.77-7-f' MI -1 - - -- - ' PROPOSED MOTEL '' ' ' PROPOSED RETAINING WALL ---'.. •-•1 ^r--r--1--1 • 1 1 • .1 4,'(4'.p k , s 1 - I ;- I ......5 ,—...* , •7•-, ...-I, 4.-----EXISTING„SID_EIVAI:is. ( 1/ ••• • t•-.. ' ' . I .. I ' . ) • • sIL I ,-- .7.....7 (.-.,. .rr-,,? /•, • 41 4-•r•-)pr • '' — ' ., (. ) , ..,— ''1' i',:fkli .,,-1 morose°PATIOS I,7nT* - --TT.- ','")4 -',.. • ''''''"-:•. 's ik Sil) .-.... 1, , g3 ..4 , , . .-- , 147PAP.1.ING SPACES t'- PROPOSED SIDEWAU: .„,---.7----- , . 0,1 - CONNECTION co ERISTINe: • \ , /-...:),',/•: • i' - - • PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO SOLITIIDALE CENTEP*)7, . Development 5ummary ..... e , 1 ,.. ,iNToi-*Pov-itsTokiTRies .,, 1 ( ) / See Area: 117,953 5.r.(2.70 Acres) IN PROPOSED GRASS BOULEVARD---..,s. , \ ,- —. 1, . . I 0%\ I- ' '• . . __.- AN \ •C'• -.... I ,..„.....," --- ; F ) 7 Parking Summary i ) : , " ' 471 ' •' :rnk sfoiiink ' PARK1NG SPACES 147 e 55_J55_J ' , I 1 rr ' , , _ Green Space , , . -20.040 sr 'r- I•I . , TONIIErohnr, r il / i , • ,. V III Total w/Pr000eed SuildIng -3 .1-505 5f I rr.--' 7'' ••1"Sk',.......•... ,i, -- . t ) : / ... Ir 15. 30 ea. 12V . . & )• ,ri :i-7412 IIVII Homewood Suites - Edina Site Plan TLISHIr MON1CON1INY : ANCIIITI:CT, ! - NOBLE Enter address here 01/06/2016 iME :, c-, S— 5 a •.4 - . - baste^ �,_, 't., . „.,_,,.....,. :,, ,„ ,,,,,,,,. ! _ ,. ___ .,,t,,,, ::,,,.,_„,... ..-._ i , __ _ I _._, , lit f 1 , ril .4 a . ' Homewood Su'les - Edina ►�� NOBLE ° Perspective MONTCOMPRY AR CIIITk CTR Enter address here 1/8/16 . MftlC/tHT A-T1U riJ March 1st, 2016 TT S HIE Southdale Homewood Suites MONTGOMERY Project Narrative A F. L' H I T E C T Project Developer: Kevin Grass Principal, Executive Vice President Noble Investment Group 2000 Monarch Tower 3424 Peachtree Rd NE Atlanta Georgia 30326 404-682-1904 404-401-9013 cell Kevin.grass@nobleinvestement.com Project Architect: Tushie Montgomery Architects 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Suite 100 Minneapolis MN 55423 Contact Person: Gary Tushie Project Description: Project consists of a 146 rooms, in a 4 story, all-suites hotel branded by Hilton Hotels. The project is repurposing an existing vacant parking lot located in the NE corner of the Southdale shopping mall. This hotel is an upscale, all-suites, hotel that includes an extensive guest amenity package such as an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, meeting rooms, a large gathering room called "The Lodge" where hotel guests can share in conversation, have a hot breakfast, or a complimentary evening social all done to make the guests feel at home in the hotel. The project design provides additional green space as a visual transition to the public realm. Green space has been increased from 20,640 s.f. to 43,995 sq. f.t. (as measured to existing curb lines), storm water management and sustainable approach to project design provides a project that is environmentally sensitive. The building exterior has been designed in a soft contemporary approach with exterior materials such as limestone, architectural metal panels and masonry stucco. Pedestrian connections have been provided from the hotel to the public ` and the shopping mall by extending the perimeter sidewalk system around the entire site -. ''s' aking lateral connections to shopping mall. '� ° ite LA0 By placing the building close to the property line, the building establishes this corner of the site with a use and architectural design complementary to the existing buildings within the mall site. Ring Road Simon and their civil engineer have recommended that the perimeter ring road that serves this site be changed from one way traffic heading east to two way traffic to better facilitate access to and from the hotel. Zoning: Existing Zoning: PCD3 (Planned Commercial District), hotels are a permitted use in this zoning district so rezoning is not required. Variances Required: In order to comply with the guiding principles of the France Ave / Southdale area small area plan we have moved the building to within an average of 20' of the East property line and an average of 35' to the North property line. This will require a variance from the 35' setback required by ordinance The proposed project provides 121 parking requirements on site the ordinance requires 156 spaces in addition, we will need to request a variance for reduced parking for the shopping mall since we are eliminating existing parking spaces for this development. A parking study will be completed to verify this reduction of spaces. Project Schedule Upon securing city approval for this project, the developer would immediately start preparing construction documents for the project with construction anticipated to start in June 2016 with a 12 month construction period anticipated. „.# _07 os 444.) 41) <$)\ 9 47- March 1st, 2016 Z' T H I E Re: Response to France Avenue Southdale Area 1�� Z T MER R ARCHITECTS4111 Y Working Principles and Supporting questions for: Southdale Homewood Suites Hotel 1. Give-to-Get; Plan&Process "Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles." Response: This question applies primarily to a rezoning request,however,in support of the requested variances,we offer the project provides several public amenities that would not be otherwise provided,such as,additional green space, substantial landscaping not required by city ordinances,a public pedestrian connection to the shopping center and bus station and the gateway architecture of the building using the Edina limestone and glass curtain wall at the lodge space with public views into the building embracing the public realm. 2. Edina Cultural Preferences; Identity. "Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces,highlighted human activity and enhanced economic vibrancy." Response:The building will be located at the NE corner of the Southdale Mall site at York and 66th St.,as such,the building has been designed to define this corner by being sited within 10' of the property line's,positioning major design features of the building at this corner such as "The Lodge"which is the primary gathering room in the hotel or living room by function. In addition, the building orientation screens site parking from public view of this prominent corner. The building has a soft contemporary approach that is timeless in its design character incorporating lasting exterior materials like limestone,metal panels and stucco. The hotel is an all-suites hotel that will provide a much needed service to hospital users, businesses and residents for decades to come. The interactive activity spaces within the hotel such as the exercise room,"The Lodge" and building entrances have been connected both visually and by sidewalks to the public sidewalks on York and 66th St. Small patios off the rooms facing 66th St.have been added to further engage the public realm. By providing a use not currently provided in this district,the project ad., + .nomic viability, much needed long term jobs and an increased tax base for the City otina. 49 3. District Function "Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward looking infrastructure sustaining the district." Response:The site and proposed development does not adversely impact the existing infrastructure of the property. It is self-parked,has more green space than the current use and provides additional surface and under pavement storm water management controls. It also provides an extension for the perimeter sidewalk system with connections to the existing mall. 4. Comprehensive Connections; Movement "Foster a logical,safe,inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district." Response:As previously mentioned,the site plan provides for sidewalk connections to the existing perimeter sidewalk system with areas for resting with benches, and a lateral connection to the existing mall and bus station. In addition,it will provide potential sidewalk link connections to cross 66th St. on both the East and West corners of the site. 5. Site Design;Transitions "Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without"leftover"spaces on site." Response:As mentioned in#2 above the building is located within 10'of the property line utilizing the majority of the site area. The site plan also provides additional green space areas as visual transitions to the public realm. Green space area has been increased from 20,640 sq.ft.to 43,995 sq.ft.as measured to existing curb lines. The proposed development replaces an existing surface parking lot. All proposed green spaces are heavily landscaped to provide a pleasing transition to the public realm. The building is proposed to be 4 stories in height providing a visual transition from this prominent corner to the one story auto shop to the West and the existing Mall to the Southwest. The existing Southdale center monument sign will be relocated by the current property owner. 6. Health "Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves." Response: By providing additional green space,storm water management with a s ce pond and under pavement storage and landscaping,the environmental health of the si s been greatly improved by this proposal. • ez610 414csek' 7. Innovation "Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems." Response:The building and site will be designed to incorporate as many sustainable design features as possible such as: a) Solar Reflective Roof— (White TPO roof) b) Enhanced recycling program for guests and employees including a compost trash chute. c) Surface and Subsurface storm water storage system that allows stormwater to be absorbed into the soil d) LED light fixtures e) Guest room occupancy sensing thermostats f) Recycling of existing pavement g) Zip car use for guests 8. Land Use; Live-able Precincts "Promote well-balanced aggregations of"come to" and"stay at" places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm." Response:The proposed use is an all-suites hotel. The typical guest will have a minimum stay . of 4 days to 2 weeks with some guests staying for as long as 30-60 days depending on their individual circumstances. Guests will be supporting local medical offices or the hospital for required visits or care,local businesses for training,conferences or IT support. They will be supporting local restaurants,grocery stores,retail shops, drug stores and gas stations as they engage the community and its many services. 9. Economic Vitality "Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community." Response:The proposed project, an all-suites hotel,would be only the 3rd hotel in Edina and the only all-suites hotel and as such provides a much needed amenity for residents,businesses and visitors to the city while enhancing the city's diverse economy. A limited number of the hotel rooms will be set aside as non-extended stay rooms and as such will be available fosingle night stays. � ,s, e �� i Sincerely, TUSHIE-MONTGOMERY & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary Tushie, President cc: Dan Pellinen, Senior Associate, TMA Kevin Grass, Noble Investments G Cary Teague From: Gary Tushie <GaryT@tmiarchitects.com> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 11:38 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: 'kevin.grass@nobleinvestment.com';Jon.Libby@kimley-horn.com; Dan Pellinen Subject: RE: Changes from the sketch plan review Cary; The following are changes made to the initial design documents as a result of the comments made at the planning commission and city council meetings; 1) Moved the building 10' south and redesigned the east building wing to move it 10' west to create more green space between the building and the street curb to establish a meandering sidewalk experience in the public realm for pedestrians. 2) Substantially increased the landscaping on the north and east sides of the building to create a more walkable experience for the pedestrian. Use of plant material to establish a sense of safety for the pedestrian from the street traffic. 3) Use of gabion walls at the guestroom patio's as a landscape feature to make patios more engaged with the public realm while maintaining guest security. 4) Added architectural features to the north elevation of the building that fronts 66th street to have a more consistent design theme with the east elevation and center elevation. 5) Made a sidewalk connection from the south parking lot to the NW corner of the site. 6) Reduced the parking spaces from 147 to 121 to create more green space at the frontage road so the sidewalk experience could be meandered like it is around the building. Substantially increased the landscaping to provide a sense of safety for pedestrians from the frontage road traffic. 7) Added 6' to the sidewalk island connection from our site to the Center entrance to add shrub landscaping and green space to this experience. 8) Added more storefront glass to the south building entrance to make it more reflect the north entrance 9) Substantially increased the landscaping adjacent to the south building edges to more reflect the landscaping along the north and east edges of the building. 10) Made the traffic on the frontage road two way traffic instead of one way headed east only. An additional change that was not talked about at the meetings but was necessitated by engineering, is the elimination of the storm water pond. Kimsey-Horn determined they could not meet Watershed District design standards with the physical size and grades so the pond was eliminated and additional under pavement storage and treatment added.To offset this change we added a more formal water feature in front of the north entrance to the building that we feel enhances not only the character of the building but also the pedestrian experience within the public realm at this corner of the site. Gary Tushie ''r ;>i'ie;', TUSHIE MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS II Architects I Space Planners I Landscape Architects I Interior Designers From: Cary Teague [mailto:cteague©EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 9:26 AM 1 4 & ° ..„,„,., ,., ,,,, . . XIV.... , ), ,' .. SO ::.yt...---2-F,_,0-. ,,---. .... . --4,... - - ,. - ---,A4...-...• ,,,,,, ,---- ---,. --: ?--,,-..;1...7...--,,,,.*7 ----.....-r,..-- - - --- - - - ' '-:..d-.,2.)°-. ..Ti&-..• -,--..., .:.`,,‘--tv' ; .:,',vt,L,..-' ' --- ' '''` —,,,,,v '...P'r-lq,t ;2..."''' :. -, ..,.., 4%-44 4. - "', '''.-- '- •' ,.4'"*.- ..;4. 1,'","'1.7.:t'..,'"':',..i, ,. --------7- -- --,.. •—e---- -''.- .. -' _ - ..,,,,,,,,TA(0.4. ve.',4,0*,,,t. •-= f'- ---:.t [ - •.- .-- , V,,,... .;'' ,•41 ,' - - I -. ... ' 1 •4'Y : y/ , : •. i 4 gti* I ,, . , - ' . ""' M.. • ' ..' ---- •. '''.--9 ...-7-................ p---r9 ail& Iimil N A I L S IIM I r 414\ A1.19 - Site Context ,,, ,n7„.,,z Homewood Suites 02/29/16 — NO:BLEi 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 • S ,. .�- µ. rr'�, ,tea ,.„r ,. , T R _ I I I I -- Yi _ M y4w + aCC 9Cz �T • -y\ �} fir_ '' }t•, "I D + . ray_.(. i _ r �'i �2t'`„rti f.f'SS`hT` Sv `S a 5 I%,IW!m. / F +K .�. _�4 ^� �y +b.:.. �� aG n^ty�, •4 ., i ,v ``�''' �I I�4I Yi ab Vie ' '3sd , 2 .1' .�.: . w-F,?-,;'. ...-:.;.::', ,tet.n l6 p,1 'b 5 Y'yy'� 4 % .+ vv` • e �' ,,IJ rwf'i� ra,. , -,-.,.....,,,,,k1,,, .A.A.--f'h ux Homewood Suites A1.16 - Perspective D ° 5 ” ' MONTGOMERY NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 S r. -., ., .,,,,.:,,,,,: , .:_:,,, ,,,,,t.,:•:-...,..:`.,- -ii.-4'-.'-. . ' g ` n . ,r • Herr i • tai .,,.....„--_,,,...—i----- --- --. --,---- ! 1. ' t------t i — - 1 '4:4 -. >xx IPig I L'''';;'1'. ;� �� ,�.�;�;,�.� ''.4 ,�,.�-.--....t.oe.�•�•„----,� " "'`q.� '° - c,�•..:'s� tM�f+�f�lAt�rsti� �i - 1 � '� --4::: .� ,:,PC„�. r, t y C c �. i�� � �Ili �Ih 1 .,'..11. .."-'1.^3.;_,,, .. pie. C pk Y p r 4 $ h T.. af� ...... .-” ee .4._=„!<4,,,,,.....,-„„.2,4r,..• 3s� F ' 1M . 'Y . . ---,-,,,;:z„,...%.*,,,,-.,,...,-,.- r t l°µ ,M 0.n �� i 'h Homewood Suites At._ 1 A1.15 - Perspective C ,k11-71:111:11 NOBLEn,FnnONNcrs 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 f ygq� q Ig �y '. FOCK FACE CMU EXTRA DARK BRONZE A 1',' I I i !I '', -I 4? q( i 7 H537 PLATINUM a { I0 AMCON BLOCK PROFILE PANEL ,. �n 1111'10 y ' �� CFP-16F(VERTICAL) in II - FIRESTONE i! 1 k'1 5; r �4" ..'',,f.3,-,, 'z i k f'` ` 1'. METALi sx 7-.,L4 ? �, .r _ x, :"�� CMU#1 PANEL#1 �.� ---- ,. 3. J ,-,�* EDWARDS STONE ASHLAR COLLECTION #142 SPECTRUM BROWN as .k' DRVVITTEXTURE SANDBLAST�' } * ' ; 7- -T— COTTONWOOD DRYVIT I M ".j til LI . k I T .L_1 L J �. _ t STONE#1 STUCCO#1 '' _,_..,°a..-_,2+' Ztw,SFgF_..I MEDIUM BRONZE KYNAR 500MYLAR 5000 FIRESTONE METAL FLASHING+ COPING COLOR#1 Ma 'A\ Homewood Suites �_� A1.11 - Building Materials ° 5 " ' A RCII�I TE f:RY _ ARCHITFCIS - NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 I 11 it11 METAL PANEL 41 ACCENT METAL#1 -,,,,.4-----,. l sM000 - s .-. * Rausoossolomi, . _y . 3 I y�;. �w , .,. --, 1 � a� I � g . rm -- .,i III "- 1111 , > rmraa; "'- __. __ L,-11j IIIII ■ice y...-,......,.., .. ..«. - _ _ - Homewood SuitesrIla A1.12 - Building Materials _' NOBLE ARCI1 -5,1; 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/16 6 • �..s r,`^"' r ,1{t,�anJ•1---,-:7\44-4;k °rd1 N 8 l' wW.r% . '',1•L''.. 1.W ;'' tey 4 r ' ofm it k �• / 4 1 AH M !..,41",!,' z • rn k � • g i� " ' T••:,...';'''.40''''. xt ia ...- i , .K, e < r . r - a. * 11 404 L`: ¢ • ,- ,. ,'.1,r`-•,','''....'''';, . I� 'pt S "' sI 1 �'# , ., i .,r-s :-.!.,.. .-,=...,.4 kln ....-,v4.-.134.,..,.,..: .. --, ;JEi I s c II 6a,, �!. a [ ,, A p s ^ r 's �' E.. ., 67.-., r t� 1 r 2 }( +7t r _ y‘`.--:-;1-jI 1 '..., .. �' ;.• s °d {. IIIIIII { 't+'�"��r 1 •I J -.i+-•4 J u ,, ,7 " -k ke ,s ��e p 1 . ra d " x i • a'`'•_ t rR :,a is , '4' ff ,+fi I ;~ e a - ... �{� 1:\. I k.. ,. ,,/,‘,..!,,‘ f}1 t i� 1. � ``c.�. .,-', �7 t ',XI r N ,�o-.�p • •' ti A''''',!''''''.''•.,' [/ r l'. r t�1. sf .,4'.,,,, ri t i, _ .; ',2,' 4 a ,YSrlk.._, �"" ".. F F E z 65 r '1.1!.7.-'!' r.� 'ii J51 �� f "SF 1 i x4r � � � ` ..',".:*.,'`..,''Irl- r'., '1� i,,,,,,' ,(,`1; 4. 's ��-- ./..'... � S t �S R` r y,.,i' �D"'. a'"'agw 1 • r,i .k '�' �. * `'7 1 �. r t1• t Yui Homewood Suites _ A1.13 - Perspective A „ �r<;<',E V nrscui rrcts NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 • ' h_ .:r :411.1 ! _ i"' 8 "yt' • '...t•-'w ,7� d°, 1 -,_----.7T-_---1 ._ ...ry - €.. --4-- ,--.;.'""' � 'r '^U ;�-'> r 'ens _ e.—.- - i ♦ kms' .di 'L �^ F 11# r .. ! 1..11'3.---`X � - r� gyre,.. '� .1::: '. � __ { 1 prixy 1 -- z 1J I.i_ +AR x "i'1F { t a; ' Y VIII ,. I 'fl I t, ' L. i I I i kh , �. _/-7,,-r.;....-..a, {�1 ,,- ... - il -31:- 'A..'"'11 ki 1!, it•,) - 4 ,f. E:yF m , +o- 3 rt K ,y,�i{ 'n s y, �Tc s e � g ; � a-a Era Bra 1 t A1.14 - P �'' Homewood Suites erspecive B - NOBLE Al ON T('(>F)FRY LLArz CHITL'C l'S 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 :41-A--;-2: ,.,ZU ItL "''�4' + • LTi / RIS' i r ' - rA 4 W CO ! r.1� . r '' - 4) N ` .L� ii— Q ppp 4 _ (} ,1.,• \ ' \ ''N . ..--itist- -- \` �,` Q .- 1411101 ,. A A • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ <. • _--- ,.A I. _ , ,-,. '41 \ ,Ls , _ _ ,_ .4 „, ' -- a----- .- fi \ * \ . . . 4t 'f - iy. ,,,nom, ' 143 n r 1 n� � if n ,g _ it' 1, i:I.. i, , .t.:,-.',,i 3�. ,' 9�i' , - I _ 'P` ca:- w \,, , - —....2744*'.',;-4,k' .4' .--..17/.--, I- I 4 - .7b 1 o COC W 4)I o z I � X '- �, S .'t i' y dl -*4-: om,.. .z :YPkz� ¢r • ,f C* ,xE , s FP . it • ' � F 1. ! ...,,,, C 4 0 ;kk , Sr p f ' � , ae 0 p ; � '',Y,...,-,,,",,....1',;''..' �^5,°1g�� tr k � lj;;:',1"Y‘,,;','-',:::::itli. 4.;rici ,.-4,-.-,..........-1=.. . , ‘,. ,..,,!.._,-.4,-_„ - _ -,, _. , 1 C4 « tr cS aur �, Q�tin.r+ r,, ' � $r .isN a c y.,� :' k h „' • t # tP ark ` } r. ; a4 ` I Ic 1 r $w t -7.79701t11 o Nk *t Wiir e . 4 i '� -tL jI . .. yr i! 14 life ? ",r Air 3 ''L Homewood Suites172 i„ �,l A1.18 - Perspective F ` 11 MONTG() i F:.7 ss nacllirecl's NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 • . METAL PANEL#1 _ ACCENT METAL#1 — c —_ ■■ 1I '- -- MI- SMI--. MINI Mil 11■ 11■ �11■111 1111 1111 J ;; ■■INN I ■■ ■■ 1111■ 1111 ■■ ii ir Ifl�i— �r ,r !' 1'®■S� MINI _■—� 11■IIIMM 11■ '■11..11■ 1111 iii 'i ■r ■i 1111 r� ~----__-STUCCO#1 .. .I--o .OM=mIIIIIIIIm.. -. MINI 1_111�-..--. .. MINI .��N.. -.li■�■1fI -. .- MINI .. — L11 1111 11■ ■11 ■11 ■11 1111 11■ 11111■■I�■■ 1111 1111 i■ o moz ACCENT METAL#1 —_ ■ - .^ , i, 1-1-TT-17,,- .�.4.,.r � ' ,��STONE#1 I _-: - 1 I• i■■ 1111 #1111�1■■1 11■�■■II ■■ X11■ , H 7,:;;.,s .— — SPANDREL GLASS SPANDREL GLASS SPANDREL GLASS GASION WALL ONorth Building Elevation ALUM.RAILING SYSTEM AI METAL PANEL#I ACCENT METAL#I az'S .- -- ■ - - -- - . .MI .. - M - . . MINI I � MINI 1111 11111 112 11111111 111. 1111 MO ■11 I. . —17-1— M1 , 7. ,a�� —.1__. -, .mtiLL MINI MINI 17 .—■ ______ 1111 1111 1�1 1111 . ■■ 1111 ■■ 1111 ,M ' 1111 STUCCO# 1immter 371for..R , —- III 7 . -21.�>. ' MINI MINI 22 or , • -• -- -- .—. -- 'x,,-,-a t.,_,.; ONE#1 1111 .1111 1-1 1111 �11111 1-1.-..11■ 5T _ , ----- MINI - Q ji411111- -� �� �•� 1� a.L4, -.- ..... —T i1. 9 STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM O Northeast Building Elevation ACCENT METAL#I METAL PAiJEL#'. MO NMI EIE —_ -MINI---_ MINI rto. 4z aB ---1 MI MMIt!L! - NIMI MI- .--�1111 MI ■ 111111 ■■ ■11 11■ 11 11 ---I — -�L-i Tri -��� 1111 1111 r■■77i■■_ ■■ i 11 11 _I I ■ I . I ■ i —D« - --.. -- -= EMI 1.11111111r11111=111 I i. .. — — I ■■ ■■ T ■■ ■■ ■■ n II ■ fi`, • um • ,, =Num r4 -m; ��� I e.e.�� „„I l im 1 1 oil 1. I - �_ ▪ g ,, mss)T*,0 STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM Southeast Building Elevation STONE#I OSCALE _1n.o- 14 It Homewood Suites A1.9 - Building Elevations ; NTGONIRR ' ,IrrL, ARCIIITI:CTS ........,L NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 . , 'c -:, mums ERE __ - ,,,,m__ - ____,,,,,,, r, ....... .. ..... .. .. . .. .4 ..„... . 1 N■■1 no is 1■■11■'_I 11 111ii...._ ,, _____ r_i_iii_um____ gli ....... .. .. ........ ... .. 1i11111v 11 N. ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■I ,: AIIMIMM =In 1.1. wa. 11111111MIE Mill II MINI MEI 111N11111=11= MEM MN MIMI NM f" _—'-',';'f=-9 e ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ I Mill 1 1� 111 11 I !� M® II MIN MINI 11111111011•11•=11 1111M1=11111111M."'^--- MOM— -- ---- air - ol1. ■■ ■■ ■■.MI " ■NMI■ ■■ ■■ 1 � 11 I.11 il_I 111111 1111 1 11 1® 11 iENMR.. �.:l ■. ■,1■111 11 I■o " i!!i1li!! - kiIiHiJIiiItuiIiH Fill STUCCO#1 -----' 7,, & '—',I. OSouthwest Building Elevation AO Northwest Building Elevation ACCENT METAL#1 O Southwest Building Elevation B n� n c uu CMU#1 r. r II II lelle II II :I II II II II Z III - MIIIIMMIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIM IIIIMINIMMIIIMIEll 11111911111111.111.11111 .. _-__ .: _ .- -=� mi.-_Num■ Er MIM jjN ■■ ■■ ■■ �,1 ■■ ■■ 1M,ri�� ■■ 11��■!, '-- -- New --- -- -- -- =--mks -- -- eiw��-�- �- . .- Rozr,:-0 Ililmelpi ....sem . -,,,,,,1---o)_ -- - - 1111111111111111— ��11 rz 1, mix-- 1- r— -- -- -- _,mac-- 11;' -- -- _ ! LT , -■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ r ■■ ■■ �■■r ■� ,Tru-,-, p, — }n South Building Elevation — nu .49 ® o O West Building Elevation Homewood Suites A1.10 - Building Elevations TUSHIE Au CIICIPLT9 — NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 • �w W GGth ST U �` _._ i" \-1----73 it - , J ��t }m __ C � laJ �t EXISTING RETAIL BUILDING—�-�J. r ` PROPOSED HOTEL r. r t ii1u ;� / ',.:,,, ,,,. / may,, r its i 41, 4'• i t ,{pi: * <'�ds p .. �. tt aay p,,.L 4 l. t . .. ..d � y if / (; y4Y I -' il �l ry M• +moi a'0 f:,a. _y• y f^ f( /it �Y. e Y ` 9a�� ,,, zt t 1/ , 1- ERETAIL ' .''''- 54 I r:t '''''' "t',514. 't1-: - • /. P' - ,,. , - - 7Ft/ "4- ate r 0' " • Alar , � £'` ° LL' , % ., 7y "pip ,.,,,-. s '11 .:54'4'7 7:',"",5't5- `hi 4_, .__._ -� � �• � .: � i� r'"2""`✓ �' AT � :4 e \,,,,Slit, � --�v EXISTING SOUTIIDALE CNTER • + m f # yr�'. ▪ {�i 1.9,A;":. f+� dt�.' ' �\ f ..- d/ tt... l.: '�} f d 1 �. 1,k.. �„� yid. Ltsvi " �$ ��` EXISTING Ai*. � - I ,Fa an+' } �, �` ' k" A% ' '• +, - a - r GROCERY n S H ` 't" a. L1 v /,y' . a '3'" <4r r ^ �'° t F STs.^a + - ..:� ` --,5 , & 4.,r,-,_ r '''' 5' ,,,,, iv � . Y�, gx fi '� ;x< .. ,r ., y 19f � •��'.a c ''v v :," •`' 1. dv i � :'�:, rr ,. ,i' ' ; s -fr * t `EXISTING APARTMENT ' ; tS:; f''' w,i � - a r a.1 4 '_ ▪ - , d't1-if .�:... ` '-: „.- -^--i away I i/ 1 { ! , • g� a �t a �, a ' s � :� r.-, — t' s ,, r -,,,,,,t,„,' df, ii34 d-:c. x's. s'- '1'..z;,--;.':--";,,,--;" �' x- .3'7,11' • • o m ion zao aa� ^ s+ w>t^ M 'W 69Th ST w_T.ti_s. "'yam �"�3� Homewood Suites �''r '� A1.0 - Site Context „<CII I I,+FV 4,�( nacniir.c-rs NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 W 66Th STREET .,..-_— recresrc rnrros DN ,,, - Y �.... *x-- ;IlifRA' -r. N ���� __ ,yl e 141 �_eft ACEAM � �� ¢9°` II ins-1°1 qa 1 z A� 4..,\. \ . : fR E "" wi I1 _ ,r 'r I 1 ' \ RLT Rtt LWii fROfOSED EOM HOuuu137 RO wn EXISTING .... 7 6.*' PROPOSED ham_ ';e 1. ,„,,t,,4„;;„„,4„„„,, RETAIL p/ r BUILDING 1 'r," I 1 ,.\, 10' 0,,,,,P z1 ,-- 1 , GnDq oOurf WALL 3 i 17 s slat ga Development Summary �,,, „"_ r ,•, (XX�; , j' r 1 i Site: 1I Site Area 11 / �1 '41 �,: ,2 113,964 5.F.(2,62 Acres) @ t '* Parking Summary ,i� __-. �r PARKING SPACES 2 �� v\ h s Green Space I l e �O 41kTotal Existipg 20640 SF p """.4'"" n r�pr'- 1 �„ I: yE o ,te 15 5F 25715>f ; e Lc iR 1 Total Proposed Green Space xe�rr PARKINGLor �,/ w Building: P„ \' , r oGNL :\ 4-Story hotel h 1 uouuMeur.sr. " \ �• �/ °'g rfOESTRNJi CONNECTION TO '`.\.' k\\ // Building Footpnnt�l 28.9275.F. soumanLf CENTER %�., x,1,1 f Rf EXMTING PAM. xOS D1 sCOTHDntf CONufCTR'.0 '/, — !I/ w � PAM.w T ..ir .r„ ' ._, t; �- wnrls 055•550,55,0inr IA , ,, '''''.1,:• ( j I� , vrt. Mr f wa F, Irr. N/ .. ' N . "Fr ' i 1 � „ {30 � k :C, � r � k I k °''' _ Homewood Suites - NQBLE A1.1 - SitePlan , s N r E ARC ITS firC 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 — W 66Th STREET Ff.OFO_`ED PATIOS GE:C P.ATIVE RCCA ---. - --'--'-- z - _,, __ MUICn PLMITIMi BEC .1 '\ Rg� -!- T It , �,..',,Iellek. )'"t l�- 02 li. •••,` 7; • WATER FEATURE FOUNTAIN — ;-,' tVlin INTEGRATED SIGNAGE . .. ( 7 A.L ,.�T 1.4.OFER1Y UNE' I: 'I ,,_ -- "--.-- PROPOSED HOTEL nEUGE N n o TI c o MLS n RED FLJFOSED HOTEL I I. _ ,# <'.!;T.:. 'C;l` MJNUMENT SIGN 1 - 1iSia�++. X *; `y EXISTING p: GAE GnI WNDS APE WALL RETAIL li l I _ 4 ! BUILDING - ,, _ E FFOPP7ED>IGrNALT i f rpt a 1 1: t o X ,� 421M1 ',. p ., _ —i=<,� 1 „ Yom, . / .. i" tpx c1 � ) • , i �, - - 1 .. 11--N--; Z TI F M= _ I r Yr �� a O a / ?i--.w T� G . r . ♦ _ \ _ t� FFG O-tC FATICS ' i, �. C j t1 .. '` - A �, M1A° 121 FART... SPACES . `'. �� FZ :T TRA:.n ENCLOS1,EE ajp, rftilf +17 -1" ' Ea15TING PARKING LLT k % • / 'N. fin > J ` P 1 55s: PROPOSED MOTEL @1 MONUMENT SIGN PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO r 5OUTn0ALE CENTER L `�.y '1 FI _ �- i1 J '''Is r, \ T ty ;t GABION SEAT WALLS .. ._ . PROPOSED SOUTPID LLE CONNECTION '� , EXISTING FARE/NG_i T .15EE AI.31' j'- _ , I i' a s ,.T�'$ � , r , IrRoRTr,uue .. a 'zr i' A' AP r '� I' EX - PTING TREES 10 REMAIN 1 �, ;y. ... a - I' a `$",. ;;y. 17' r f d P e.,i. t - i , �, ! ER6TING METRO TRANSIT TATIDN I; I: / ��, Xt a Alew 5) c 1,\/ct, 1 (--- , • Ad.:6 0, 02/29/2016 LV - , -- ••• • - - ' 1./•i -------- ,- N -- • . •. ,..-. ,._ • --- -‘' ,..„,...N:=.--,' .. _ •-r-- - (E'I V 229) , i . • Ne, _ y :',.-:-'---.7', "------• •. ------ '' . 3' ik=•.. N01132NN0D 3-Ivo-linos agso.iod G11VM1\7,99 NOI9V5" T . 1 •• , - . .: . ‘,. e.P , •,--- 4 /1•• ,,' •• ,I.:-..! . .- .. :,'", •,---", •',1 ,•••,' ., \.:.„'T ..: , r4tAL -: ‘, .L'i !li I 1 • . !? ;4/ ;• • 921N23 21V01-111109 ••:- ' .,\ , „, - 01 NOI132NNO3 NY11G202.J / • - ,/ .1 •,(-:- ,•,' • . \ , ___, , •••- li .;•4(:-/ ,-i,---- •• '' 1„;•,:' ;it..••_.".....„,., ..; - - ' •• ,;'• . • , , 12101-10250.4011.1 • . .::.`.1' , \) '`•:' L.,'-•,_ 1 ,..-• k ' • . . . •,:: 1. J I 1 ''.,:" .. •-• tr,, ,t•-, '\ • '. 1.'':L. . : ( / ' )Z-:• • ' - • k •r -• .-: • . 'i . • , ... 1 -•- 10. . - •,.. - .-•. . ... 1 . 101 91\11A21Vd 91 , ' . -• .. • ' •• •.14 _ , -..T--.. ' .--', . \ • . : • _A-2A s...•-7•;%.- • , -1•4•,',, - -....*,-• '-;• ' • "," .; '' /if .'-'-7---------:--Z.'t,. 3‘,4119013ND H5Nra • . . . • ,:- . \ • - v / i - . - it' -.....,-, 7:---z-,:\ • ••-,.. .)! ) '-',. G2DVdc 5 AVd 1Z1., ,. , . • • • •s.F., )J09,.1 . „:11_-- . ' '• ,..*,.., '•,.' -T-A-,..,•:. .. . •;.,.L.,, i-.1.; \ ›,•., . ,fi; :. 11,'-'''• ' 4. .1--,5. 1.5--,:,,,,,, \ .. , , , i i,-1-,-_ . . . . ,... , ... /, ,... i .. ,, / 1, ,. i . . . " -1,E,4•• ‘.• '1' rtri,,,,,,,t-,,,.. .,-..1 . ('• . • )--- . e ' :z,,,:,___,7:, •,<,_'417 .. • . . .. _ ,. , .• ,...c • -r,r . 1 • • • ' .••-•'-'••)-.?'4-kx....-—---7-7.--- \• - „ , • k ;F : e - •••- r.L.;• .., ' .. ,,.‘'•1` • • 7.: • . .. . •!. •,—. .•,...,,0:(_,,--, .,‘ , •1•.• 4-,: ., •• -.. `, • ., . i •A •••4 ' ,' t. r _, .Tr.r.k..;.•••• i u ' ! t3I • -/-••;\ 1 „___.-,_ , : ' . ,----- / ., 1 t;-;, --•-• / \ c'' :, •-•-t_d-- „, , 6-72- ''. 2'. --,--_,...''L” .-L. , . • I 1 : I, II II . ' I 1---- ___J 'Th—f-, / a , i , 1 ,.•-•:',:,'!...--.• .. .`-,•••, ; 4 I!. il 1 I I ) - • ',•---.. --.Y.t--• =.. •j . . .-;---•-:•,-'-L '''.0 '-•--n. , 4,.• .. . , ..,..,. I II 1 ' .1:,‘. • .te•''';!,.''4. 1..S. . '- -'. AC "1 N-t ______‘. •0,:fl- :!!! .1 r • i -[ I 1 .1 I , • , .1 I ii , ,7 ..,,,. .•,_ ..,.. . .., - , - ... , . . , . ..,. i..-_:. -,..:1':' .--f•,‘,., '-1.7.rt...,. .. .:',..---7 •:--:3-•?,,, .., • , ; 1 '‘ , ,it.:(43- v.,', • '• • .:, ;- . . .:: •„ 74,-, '' ''' i 1 1 1 1 •:',,jr....\ ‘ . ,1.:3 •..- ------- 11 %;. . '., . '. ''":"'• ' '''''-...j.:•:.,'-:A -11101-4 Cl]G0J0c1 TT 1TT111. . ,,,,-,i..„;..,::„:„............, . F-1 1 1 .• . - i • 1 I. A 1. 111 •- s ..,,,,,, _ i • .• , • .,.".':::-..: ' • ' . , ,,,!.:.,:.,•":".. - '... \\00 -, • ::::7-•:::-5..,•:::,', 1-;: . • -ti-,:': ; \ .-,%"-•'-'-'-' ' TIT ',,,i,F4„, ._ ,1,-4,: '- '7, - . ,-,,, - •T -I! - -ii , _FT117-77-714-7. _ i________I -11 11 ___,L. - z....,' -,-i --v, . -f ..-:"-...'-ts,..-.,(--!•i--;s', •.____ .7_._- - ... 3 =,_7_1„.,....,...i. .,; _._ .-,-,-...,.. ..„ --J 1 ,,,,,, i.,?,_it_. ,:,_ ., -...---,,--- --:•,,--- :7,--1 ,1;^.,•..' ,. ‘, - '---- <--...:-'i • ----• '•iy,„..."" ' .‘ • - ' ;::-Z,:."--,,.;,,,-;"•;;.' --teit 74 ____,.• -- .•-:.•:-.:,-. - :,.._ -`'-., ' • ,-,. _:f. •, " `,..-- 2. 1-1--,----.--1- Gtb ...',4,-- n. • . •'-'--,:-• .--=:=.."--.:-77---.--•' g-114'•, r,--,.14.••,-..-,,;„ • •.--,•'' • '' ' `..ri.---„,.. : ' ...-•-.-±G'•,. L%-`:---7- - ' --,7 __ ,'Z- *----,‘..:,., / „ „, -'•:-.1:. -•---.1-:-1''- s7------= `,,,-,1-- • - 'Liij • •,',1:>--.- -----. ,.- ---- -----t-,-:_____.--_ f:;"; t.,.• -/---1."-"•---- ------•-------_ -.... ,-24-..r.---.-'.' ..1 • - ..Nt. ..• •;J:. •• , 11 011 ..---::---'- ....--_,....'.._. • .' '''.' '..` 29 51\1111NIV1J1-13-im - ....-_- -.:. -------• N309 2A11V90320—5011VJ C12;0909d _L]gl.1-G 1-1155 M ^ 8 • 1 (-,0 liuG ___ ��__ ___� ------'7----"' I I I 17. �.i\ii t M.9LU.68N -'-N A•096 1 y'b1 zl°9� _J I I (s'1( rt'y 9N L—o ,,,. „;'J gc .,,. _1'•y �_- —J y��, Ff9Y/ M.9f,LD.68N 3'�j'1 rL�q6 - 1333 NI31tlJ5 (03b1]OM IONf / O ,r1 y_a2r //2:-.3.9 ::•4:-'` - 096/r)N fi'V`y br6 N9dl 09'81 0s hyo o, a$ 1/ L'o L U/^Vl v / /7 8 — -- 99 Z'Of/ M„gS,Z5,685 ����,— 1/-,IJ\l/\ �• / 90'61,=8 866'6=7 /i i -�.:n Z69Z1+7- U 9f'6Z=J.Lq,/S,Of=V'`'' 3,DZZaG40N"�` tl/ 1C/V f?1, 81 tJ?f 0008=8 39[;(1,.69s �/' M M.LO,SO.bFN=08BJ _ .,5/9=7 SLY'=8 2 ./0,//.06=V -3.9r,L61.0 =c� (... p9��':ai •.BS,Zf.gZI=V �Q I 44- (9'DZ`--� - qo 38t(1,,686 ,M M,1,7 Z/.0715' p �••°° mo �•p may- m -'a6/z — ..,.s: Z1Sr.98'° \ �9S 6B:V$4a�Q. -4 A9sF/ 3.9r,[l;6es �:qa 4ayz ‘1-- N q 8 i",.> ozl I LL n S' S�� 1^1(x` .r, Dao a,..,,•,i'_,t 1,-- 3 6r,9q.SN 4 �9F,(t.69S $2 -* 4 N a�n tl'• 91 Opx,S 51 COY- 00 Tk _3.ei.Ir.aav C] q II �.•t• ] I 7I6'.L,7Q -zr:az ;s--q;' op JJ I o v 9 �� � ox •7•73x. y_.._. � � i in`,, I y.. �. . --6661,91*an. -- ''' i'''''4' n o 1'49 Y �� 2 251:1/2 5G.<�'�t I o `) , ,, N ,' I '°4 ni 9 `')i- ^��0A1,1156 '�'�� 3,0019",�ONI g ? O\3\ ` .04 04 3,00' 005 ^i i' nda°— �'] J V I'-'�M.00.95.66W .. - rt 'AB as 11 Io,o,ta baa ww ya 3aw u!y,...rt ". _�329,12.09N 669 OOZI 1 / rt p---a!y1 aaulo a1y1 PI valu aoM n' ,laoro 0 10 oz^ I i )' •`.6921 )' ON A3AaN5 ONYI 03a315103a u,41 m ay,Pull A)IVaa Aga,ay " '"'3.96,0/.91W 2 olpsauwy,3,uno0 u da 531111 30 ara..030 8$'60/=8 00'98=7 IO� t C3 C "-607'9=7 eZY,LZ,ff=V Ae 3ortaA1ps Al n d u H w 3 spy, C g 369,80.695=0887 y I$e „ 1 to ROP---241 PPAwddo uaaq say Aauns PP,pal11150.a Stull'16960 595'8898'ae5'ltlls'Nn a,loons nd - .1' 2 :I olosauu N'Aluno3 a auuaH'NO 51A10 A3AaN5 V 1 i d . r N A1nda°— ,o1.P'V A1uno3 u dau03w a doy3'A,Iow - C] V �L y y, 960FZ=7 Ranms pup,0a.ala!601/v1 PAPA 00 p0 ----- Rap--- P 3 y5 I'5"',.11--, =-9/Z0s//=N R'PaIPP P. nq 5 s, ,0o,60,rro b S! peq,asap Pool,p plod uaaq an s,o ,oVd puo -OZ A a goAotl axpt)Dull A,lIa 9a,ay �6y-• ai 9I•. IRN PIPsauu,A A,unoa udauuaH 5331Aa3S 317153 17321(NV 1N30153y 2. p - yy5 �' y Wr Z/6'/ SA 4 C) S)Zia .6d1Q'• t Ia60.,,,— -_— \ �6\ w_ _ -:xe j) n - :oy C'''' 4 0• ,.9/7/9//-8 ,� oz/ 0085 �-': lam3w 711 AE9�v f Y �p 51 .00160,/=O tl1053NNw.411103 30 110N000 Allo 'I &r a9'�r°s 1^.,tY p,A 4119.% lr'+' 46" '1 C Iom6a,o to'o195auu!w'..!PI to Al!0 API!o InunpO RI10 aVl A9 PaldaaaP P o Pa+mddo ao.AaA`r�s auol lPa,=i'!saal::y1 Ii J' of M 9L %J^ ,.' ,,.� V 001),:\ `p",+ 60 � v1os3NNlw.VNla3 1--r--- • r.6Zp 0\t0 y; $ N �a 00 $ ) caw o9ss1 o aa,uwaa uu, pa i p ,�''''.7-j,''',._ 0 ' 4N...,f; 00P lSby, 2 ,. ,ns n ..± mon �• ,\.\11' a; 60. ul a - -- — ) j *� a''- C^��a.A E'P;3.0� 00 Zl "Oa:96. /r f�:J �a dvy,,n 00.05.:'/� '°'-'4,,,,,, le C� p oz R u:Alf! paauu� , , 8 IObal ...---.v..d'4• f ,995 F� ,30.3�5 P °p,, c A a vaso n ip0 p 03 .0 15 ayo 1p a„o av1 tYe 06� 31 LS y v r ap Aadp. l Ip nlPaa,d „pa sl AaA,ng Pubi o•a1=6a a y.;is - on- .b p' epav piOS. v w u un n w Ia , ,ala 6a sn u ro p a, a t a aryl love pR,uaaaAga.ay nwn ,' _ pBF h mo`5. 1 33530 Ki,..; o 6191'oN Aan,nS pups Pa,alsr6aa•v IpP,l 'JJ/ 1 :1:, - • `Rk am.m i / PSm ,Rb� vaAanma a 4 I papa '8961 Jo pllnlois poles to 0/0/S 5 ttlai11/3M/ Rlv nl Oo I1/I Pdlona uowoaa,d pSq!l3 ap 6ul,roilal a Q5,•4 Q IA i 99'w - &c': kMv/1 o ,. 1 8 S ' 1 41iM V1 Alll,aa Rq,4 /.�\•�'U.oo0a+� ,,S 6'3,0, M p ...0 - n p L „ti N ��mwP ,. 8a - .: ..'v,4, o u o S -9,;72.-4-1.. % 1, .I /ts3 , •' 1.f: �3,00 si icc�zd.s85 'IV" 5 y� U %3530S.o6 30 ONItlY36 •a :t, • 1•sp. 1'1\ _ tl 3AYN 01 030/0500 51 SISI'ON'9'l'a'tl 1300/30 3011 'IP� " � 1503 3X1'0303,5 UNtlI 0333151330 51X1 30 53S0dENtl 3X1 ap3 ' IB SK si'2YI 3.o.,e.bB 4�," 5 3 9f,Lb;vs wn f '°"3.aer:gstoloal 699/ .9£,87.495 ., /t,..„„9ZZ0/ 7 c`. n'a 1 .../ 009=8 6Z' 3 __ .ZZ,80.06W 1333 NI 31005 �, °X1103 O9bS1-s,g3dwv16 6 tri dtlJ J513 X11M alobvn 1 63ZN3N0vn a3adOJ 03b0"gJ s5v39 a313ntl10 HJM[I'1 53 n30 /`.J , ,V 4 .0.',4) ^i; ,1 1 ` 1 y/y Y in3n35r3♦r.sxPlx jy 6,�i o>z on ° OSI • r 3,00140.ON C ann.69.9 ON=,d°3Natln.sp X1N,tln 3YX b31on3N •• u I�°T y_,� y_ -",Y4r t f —� 0905 513 KIM 33Nbvn'ON0o3N1N3w11ph xOtl°5310,30 • r r�' �" �..aY�,r ,!i 553•711 ' r v n., -."„ 8c'.': 'ON nir r -,n.,-,... _,o P9.9 31b H1M 63N3tln 1351N3npNJn N°a 531PN3 0 �-..,..... , I I I .ON •004 .1'21 ON„43AHIIS ONV7 G311315/93Y 1 t=kRI 1 hq 1 -a I ....,.., ..... ' 2 : g - 1 a b 2 a al.1: 1 a h-E.sa R ili tE %117.1 . •&== i .4; 4 ;L , ri gamii,v,- 7-.1 a 22 Will lir 1 il i Ohri : 1. "•' • • k P •"10-",.. "'::"';,' filti:;\ - 1.i. :t9 t.9 ( -,:s •E:F. -42 1152 ; I il i H•I iilLti lill = 'i j-'Ls. 16i' .*4 i 1 E • ;Ps 1"1-1.1--2' :1-'‘s\ 'i • s - •; s...;.; ..".en ,,,,x) !ii $ Y.; AA Al .41' '2.• 50 al E I\\; ai.,,,,....-.1-. 2..t., .22..„ 5 •alia...i ; / I •..„ ..„.•'; "E.,. i ** 5.; I \E. -L. a.... . , hsl,L"'!!:_ '•••til I • --•"---. 4•1 e ''h:11/,'-r• sg gill, ./.ri R '''• tkil , 4(*/:•• E„L t;Ci• '''-.0.• ' ii : '6"' •''."-= .clv•s- - IL -- ,- --, 46;Ri 4.,' Er 1/1•`-•\*”. .,--"4-=-'2 g ''''i Eg;g -*,:•-`-"-:6_ ;es-, -71qi .•'*'-''Pe,7,,,'"--...'1,537-=--__-1'1.L 4 E,6 "---------t_i'''•,dji ::•' 6.7 ,--• R ;'•' i shl ;,5,"ii 1 i POIP.mitit, -Ai ,... =''7.-.7"."'"F........, •ii .h. r '''''45.11.172 s-46-------Z.• - !I - __I_ . 4' '•• '''' /j' ,--1441iR\ .".•'''..s '.0- E. J" .., . **.ii.4 2.'-,, . .; ,TE '...g.au h ------='---, r.--1"..• -:,4'5, • --..--- h ftwi -ig - i• .°I !1-1.\`‘ .. • .0.„..,,, -,• - -• 1--., -ir -- '-.5,:gi-Vs -i'' ,4---..)01 -•••••;- • •'''..,5,-i . ^..-_-_,L "Alkp.,stp -5 h is. gtx-Aw...... --,„,...'.-4.....--_-..t,g41.,,,;....,s•x-r-''''... • •-___ • .. Id i '' I ,, •••• - -4-0,001.-.-----,..---,,,,, ---- ' - is°1-s; •I's •••=: -7t ••j.,••!kW.arre...01WIJMI-..... ..--0----"' 5-- 6 .6"-.5.4111 .W.....- ____L-' _ 55 -- . . - ,E , k i. g, .!IA E As.,41, Alr_im,4___ __01...4_,,,,- '111,,._-4-• Az,. E•Eb.ii=1 . ; - , , 5 tr• .„2-4,/, a • g 7 .i li,I i 20,14,2:.. ,,, ....',:a...: . 1 ' a''a. '' •• 2' 4 LI! r g ; ii;:.,_,i / 4" • ill i i \I :7 7 ii*-------______- ......,..___ -- .... ,.-- ,ii 1 I ii I 41‘, i,b' ,• . g g g g---1----I E If$11%%... 1„.__,... .,,,... ...._fik Ai b 2*gls---,• i., 4.....=''" t- L - lir 11 1 1 a i/ i i i ' E i i/i "'71-'' ' '.-.' 1,,, -1. ii' i 51 • . - a i Jr' ;\.," 4'.. •E,'..1 --, ,."---.--:-.--.- '.I.' ,a k.g-1.g i - 11. ..."..'.1 i /1 -, 1-.1 . r LI 0 jil 1 ,, i, - .....,..= ' - i ,_ ____ i 3 .g L. 11,.1 I '§i i St' . : V,'!:;, ' ii i g ,A ....r irti till i '...b,„ i L. i 1 a'•_, s i m i e r, i , ..., t: .- ,=-,...,--\-p . , . ..11 _ 1 , i ..i . 4v, ,.." "?, I•i , ' ill 1-1 II 3/ i/ ? L c„..46...`?""',, b 2! 1 . , Q; j!'•'•Z= I - 5- , . ,., . ,. i ,---, „;,...,,,,,, / , LJILli .isd _ !.1114; . , a . „ , - ...,.p.,..). - , el.:. 1,41'- . . • _A-. i - j 'Al i \ - , g.'4,41"' . ',5' iN%!‘,''''''',',-,rP - ''"1.-ly, VI I•' --:: Alik ' '. s'A•, +N.',... ..,. 6 _1 t, V.1 4 ' 1 . I. E i , : , a 1 i ,,i-2,----X--_,.. ,i I 5 i talkt,g i i "E „ 24 g. . ‘, ,, ,-• i o. co ;(`i '''• i\ - .1-9- i t ' 'l • I 5 •Rt . E . ,„ L'-''.• . 40'it''.. • , 4/ I i "\,,''• '" . 1-1,... , .cy ' c-2, / ,-- ' • g . -.4.4,i•i .- g i: i. - ii''‘V - \r. i I ii 1 . ie.11, . -1 a a i 111 = ig • •_Ej v. i E - i •, `v E ,,v -L iL •l'ti;:''1,1 ' •1 - g. 4 •1 / 1 g -.EL '.*\.! iff 5 E ; '"•. 4 ' /j - „ i ::? ,I 9! II ka g a' ,-•- .11.-- I i 1 ' : r• . I 1 or ..- 1, . ,,, i ,tivi 1,-. ..... !) „..ir""' 6 4i ix ' 1 MI - ,,,iik . ... \W tr 1.1 er L' / .Y - '"J.:_fri-A.OZTO '"Ii, 2=3 _E-'' -.-j•E R r / 4' .• , 1-..;_. '-• --- - r • ----- - 11 "1110\ ° •I.II . I 0 ‘. Iskj.'\ i ,/ -/ p lab. a ' - 12 i'mi 1 k ,,„,„...,, r'i ' "..0 ‘1•\ . ,- r=1"/ Ogg:,' .\ \ ,.., I'i. gb g. • •a: \a r''' b•' 1 i " !,- * , • v- - .. !I i . ,/i*,/ 1 , .,,g tg 2 !-2 22 • .,):\i,t/-‘2' \. . e- L ; 1 g. • a a g 2 g E 21 iiii j 11 1. P ,3•4 -2 ix El 42 ; 82 g 11:g ig; 2 211 g COI g ..-N. ,4v... • ,-. . -,.._. ,...., 2 s 1 ; .,,,,,..! s *e ''''1/411,0,%.,A.•' ,1/ - . if g 5 /5 5 j: ... In I, ,--__-:.. -..- --- -2k,,, i'N--;44,•-•,---- •,- 1 ,, -:i I .1 : - , 25 F, Is! ii' A 0 ';:l i !! !,;•1 1-. ..46 . : g • s•-.-. = .. r1.•• :c il.-1 •-: ,t 1 - u.' T ! i - • -' ,,,,a- 1 l',.si 2 f-.1'i f k 25" . 112 z'•• ;51 T,' i d;r",'"r'fr- --4 ;•114" . . - . ,-, l'H 1 ',,, 9.3 i lq u t 0, ', As% , ' g - 52 ' Iit I !. 1 ,_ 11 •1 .4 ti V -. =',. "g i . 14 , ei ,' f i 12 1 l' it --; II! ' ,,. '25 51". ,.:..sk,° ' - V-"%.•"°- ‘,. .. g . 8, i-g= , ! -, --.. ; AI IS r: 5 'E - - E 151 '.; `22 52t2 I - g : ii g al '11;*\ ; . ' 1*'• i ;;‘,:g2-‘, li 'i. P.'"' : jii 2 2i2 27,12 22 21 22 222 a '' ,Z\ lb;1''' "\ *.e,22-,54#* ,'',N,\; i,.•"‹.5,00,12,,,,1 --.-k,k, 1 • ,,,.. -,..it,l'!„;"--.7---w.f".,-,;A,i-oNv. E. 5 .11 0 2_:.•,!. e -.1,,v7ilia4;-2 te '•.. I1M.F.MiitCTIII i it . 11 I. -2 1. .' .2 ''' NI' 1 ' ! " 1E 'I 11116:,ISM It',b• i • 22 2 :2212 28112242 2.55 ;% 58F5'.545g1,° '5a=1:15" ".1•4' 11P5' Or / hi w.,:. ,,,,yi hiiil .iiiiiiiimil 111,iu,,,H,110A.,,..1-_.,,, .1.,:::- . ...i.......,....;...... _Et,._ t;.,.., II -.............. 3 0 ,,i 111111111111111111111111 ijitliiM11111111111111 WI IIAM MhattlasifidEgn,itke-i3f,thl .I"Ie-itt,,,ttig..-2.6iih."-',-..rjh WO 11111 A ................ , - _.ten,: ,. EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES .,7,7,..7..,_,......,..:,,,,,,,,.,._.,......--,.---___, += �: .. � ._. - 1 1. THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS 8, ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK 18. SWEEP ADJACENT STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH ;_ ,_- i=:e. ..T I.j I COMPRISED OF DRAWINGS THE STANDARD DETAILS, CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED CITY REQUIREMENTS. +: 1 THESWPPP,PLUS THE GENERAL PERMIT,AND ALL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. N'PbT'S( (VC /g3 AYS .H.// d I I'•i. SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. I9, PLACE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALL - r• — L 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE DISTURBED OR GRADED SLOPES EXCEEDING 4H:1 V. I 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 1 r j ®' .A T U $ H I MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE MAINTENANCE: 1`r I �� (O ,. •• I ✓• T MONTGOMHRY SWPPP.ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 10. TIE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN lUJ I t \ 'wv.,;. .,.� \ ! s r I ARCHITECTS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS PLAN SHALL BE - >.;� 1 ! CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDIOON UNTIL NO -- I t o „ % Hri� +' 4MI�OpP-' -9\. j� y� <` THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. 11. WITHIN TWO WEEKS(14 DAYS)OF SITE GRADING, LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE REWORK a� �4 ,_I_I_.= y. �,I, V -.'.: "/ (/� % OL "w la swex,ee,z.eom ALLD,STIJRBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PATH OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE.MEASURES SHALL I \.1 1 S5 ;T t / /r (,/- 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE SEED,SOD,OR ROCK BASE.REFER TO LANDSCAPE BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE ((( / ( _,,-/' n MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY 12 PLANS FOR MATERIALS. WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLICABLE en 00 /J THE GENERAL PERMIT. PERMIT,WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT,AND REPAIRED f'� I HE e v j {t'-'/ ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWNG: �- ' IL-VI-7- " F�^ /1 1 ,1-'. A Kimley>»Horn GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH T THECONCRETEWASHWATERLOCATIONS,ALL CITY,AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 1. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL 'i �`!� e1 WASH WATER(CONCRETE TRUCKS,VEHICLE BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS , ( -1 1 ( f) e CLEANING EQUIPMENT TRUCKS, VEHICLE LL BE 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION OF UNDERMINING LACDETED IFTHEYS --• S„ L J s um MN,ST.PALIL,Nu 5.5114 diI DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED CONTROL MEASURES INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF • II \ tI g 1 �' '. ' ILII T -'/ ACCORD NG TO THE GENERAL PERMO. SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE Z. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY 1\ +'� } S DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED.AREAS ,..18•.,I.:' i L,r� 3�'L + 4`''R. 1 .( ® ,'Q \' w'cwn wau.cw [ SUFFICIENTOL AND GREASE ABSORBING SHOULD BE FERTILIZED,WATERED,AND RESEEDED fi . ifi y; / / y MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE 14. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL AS NEEDED.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIREDTH \ J \, t ? I 1 G ,X• { MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. -\ �a7- ~"�`t\ 1 �'Er�) '' �N ` CONTAIN CLEANUP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS 15. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER 3. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT = \ .4,77_, 1 J ,. +� •!! -. La (l �I L1( p'j�"•r VEGETATION S ESTABLISHED FENCE WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT rI\r • 4Y 1 I 7 1 6. DUST ON SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED ACCORDING OF THE SILT FENCE. }i z\ k\\' -�7 j ]I '�• gn TO THE GENERAL PERMIT. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVEALL SOLS AND 'k \�\ \ 'Li 1 '/' I / SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND 4. THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN -• t ]. RUBBISH,TRASH GARBAGE,LITTER,OR OTHER PAVED AREAS. A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR \P �� + / +3 SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY.THIS z\� \tc�s®✓'J�JY I (��' it SEALED CONTAINERS.MATERIALS SHALL BE 17. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES ANUISANCE,TIE MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE V \ • �, �- I,III' t/ Q O PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK CONSTRUCTION EXITS AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. ' i. J; /V//Y THROUGH THE ACTON OF WIND OR STORMWATER TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. ®_ I DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE WATERS OF THE STATE. (. Y C J b--=. ,__.4.L._-_ _ ,,,,V ,t,..2' `'v — l i .p7. 6�L.�Iww�el Iww } LI n Y f�Jr ( I 1.a ,r) "aV/cTz Aa ss1.,.. - � / / /7" .-( 1 I � S Ifni I Q) O =----- "' w csrr✓'s: 1, LO - - < — CD — P' - r°` /; , ]I i (I( 1 II _i'e N 0 CSF ll r�/`e� %-Y'/Iy �( 1.,ye} i/i .I n C. � I t ^ � �.w _.. •Lily .Hl'r!) p1 I :�w� ;--- u' ^ 4+ f° - . �` k ' 1 _ {" 111I ii'rl(ITi N� ^— ll, / ^- 1- ,.> ,,. :,, \' �� I t d,F-Ni( I t ` 4 < ii( -- L iili'Ir�i � ..1l11i lti Ii L� �1 I\f7 II��1ia � '� 4i �C� \/' y I',. ``\ '7 t//1 I ' - f --MUM ' S,..,':V, \\‘..,,/', ' ''\ . Ni l \ F V 1A 'it��1 I 11 / I ▪�'•• ,, r,ruul0r qy./,� -..Y I C • 4. 7 '`V, r 4r 411• 1 r y'/ // ,.---' Ua ND 11 'AL.,‘„ O PHASE II EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN ' � I I . tea IN �/ /(())frr+ '4._.:2/ 6 �`1/]e I ' iI h AREA SUMMARY C) E:-.-.-,-.i:i:E5--.-. .00alwx4 e`IM PRW ��� Y/i.Jt __ ;e/4'� 3/..++ 1I I1 ITE AREA 134.6126ECD :.:.®.:.:::•:• a+E1 RRcm1 P NOS uC\ON ‘,„ f ,t 0 --_ .7:1' I ,, ;g ISI Qry A- /\ PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 9],1315F ® -SF_ CO,.. ._, 1•.r 1 tiL]EExC TTT // I i i �I I !J \ - PROPOSED PERVIOUS 3],4815F �• .� lwrsargsuneucE �` I ` +�/ I I II I ���ry, / • PROPOSED PERCENT Cf •—.— Susrv1E+,� L. -B�Wd+'1 y .(.D. V ' ,. � �_:% 7:1A 'z / IMPERVIOUS TZ% O — �A I�• GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I EROSION AND I ImmII LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 3.09 AC t-•.--1--- •-I O PHASE 1 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN o SEDIMENTATIONONTROLLA ED CONTROL PLAN EC2.01 7 C & r £ Z �RriF BgY O ^„Ia S2tSS ' C E - Y4�U i • x m s� = 1:q1 o}osauUJ 'OU p3 I € E I Yea tq I yEn �� 'p A `e, ang.fgd >1aoJ 0099 _ � u,2i ! W • 1 ozu — a iEl satins pooMauJo s - : ' 0 3 Oat : 1 ' 1 .2 c 1 HI I 1 le • L i li I ' Gia a � @ ,s I d, i II! sl e. s ¢a a it 1 Fi i 1 @ gagC� k I i got 1E E 41 $ 8 ig i ' a ¢ T ° El gg : I.ii X111 i Prw g 3 ® e MI �� x1 € 5 ale x C l C O GtH E.: g.' hiIb: �3 5 a1 l i$ . E8$g I _ ? L i :ar (sE 1 i O 1 __ c74(0-0..),....,,,,,,,4t, � Of , w 0 4 4 g • sII I ✓ q � t _.'ir8 0 ar +: $7- Ov v �� \,\ ," V.I I II € r , ' !1.1:0' ;‘.11:1-- . j.-:L. ,,' x;l i . `4 5 til i i L { [�•'I,C/11 ::</ \\>.,..' ,,,,-/•.-".,„,----..,\ �, '�- l :;::';CI i:l',,,,,i‘44- , \,----_;., .; i _'''''-' ,1 :::/) nig a l iia 1 II e is ..--" e" •.. .•"..„,,,,,\ , . Vie' ' Ifi �3, I� x `, %' 4qsl � ��' L' 8r_ 0 t `0 : 4`,�N. / \ ® \ / II, ` y §„R IP f� Aho% �\ \ a'u� 4: i, i` �5.N. a`7 II�) ape:- // :,- - - -[ 1,-\\I, — .Ali i t.\.' \\, \ a,: . I LI SP § \�4. ,I ? -1] ,j r2,.._a_.— - \.>�� Vit N:,,,,,-IP,. 1 4 _ = -- F \I a , / Gy �. 1 1 ; i 1 I r� —II , �� rte: s, iP nS Imo_ ''---,1 I = i ) I iW W re s y 1 1 —I K.n��§;a 's§ eh r I t ,/ Ne w m 21 mx� r m1 I !£ i£< I w a' \ \ a n a,§aa- £s xz �. o= e„ pad £'grE3riR sl e 1 na;3,N.2 �$ i •.. 'se`s \ \11\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \ 7,11 1*I / , , Y-", Iti. i 1 V 1 1111111 1 I 11111th/1'7121,1 11 1,11111 1.1_1.1_1.1.1_1..1,1_11.4 ,c. \s,•• _ N ,. „__ —I' \,,,,,r,,ALA 21 ,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,ft 1 I .Ps PEALS1ANN, I , ARCHITSCTS, i -4 ..- 4, 4 i.i• .1 .41' I_ i: ' 'iFF,S4'47,"Nr4.40"il -- i - --• i —4- - — 90,, 29 01 \ ::: 1 , .,. '1.; :MANN.__,—..,....,.---•--.—7.-r__ p=4,7,00 ,, 'C'I"''"-47.41:1 LEEt. ; Kimley*Horn 7 /L ,, \ c6---, 0'— —al r-- :.:= ,. .i F,- ,,,,asi--- ,, , ,,, ,.p,) . ,1 L--- r—o- c.:3 , — 1, f-- - 1,,, i ; / / 9..„'\ \-\\\ \\\\\\\ , \\ '' ` '1 ' ' 1 ' 1 ' Ill ' I ' ' ' 1 ' ' - 1,4, ,I zsli VV,'' ,,.,,,,."i'ff.Virkaalg, Ii ... .1 I, iii i i i 1 I i,ii nit, i i -/ ?A''''W'A.''*if,it.L.%;.u.;w- :_ _ "0- I'.'”;1-°,%"'",t,`:,,N'Tv\III. =',I.. ,..,-.,,,,14)14“;',. I i I I I I I i 'T a'"..47'Lf ftha'ZI"'' ;'''., ' / 7., ... ' _1_, I i .--,t i 4 .', --—— My/1'k,LAO,IX`'FT',H:44,4', ,-,TV.,T 77' 0,1 5 TRVC 1/Li WOW, , . / ,i1 ` 17`' '. - >/ 4'\ ', ' - - / ". ";:-..: ii > 0 '''' ,..,' ....4 Up < V) _...,'`',,, . t "' /'''' 73 o'•c 4,7 \ \\ -\, - ,' 7 „, 4 / \ \ '' .: 4, 4 o 0 , 1 4__ / -/ , ..„ i ,.,... „ , \ 4 /°•47 I ' -:',4' \ ,/i' LLD LIJ --- -- E . _ `1.-.;,',444 4 , ,---- ,---- /n,„/ 1 ''4 ‹;>\ " 7/4——'''' ''',,,„_,., , , . -• , ..// 4 , / " ; / _ / 'IMMO W. - X.' / , i 1.' / ki.) >1" '' -'/ , \:: . _:. „ , , , ,/ , • ,• . \, // , / - // ., f'‘, ,/ /' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / `,,,,,1 S10 030 6 1 11/ '. LIN / ,„'";?4' / I / .-,, / ,;,4,-3' .„--- .{.'.5, / "4' /' ''' / /'/ ,,,-,- •A-<,r`''''`''' /e.;'' %• % '''Cfg-i8r5; ,..../..., $ /, ' e ' 1741 ,/ ARAMs A ANA.. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET / \ 7 //7 ANNA EV VAN . AA 0 10 20 AD /' ;,1/IM=1 ! / / / ‘1l1,ZIA 4' 0,YORK AVE FREE FLOW RIGHT-GRADING PLAN .1,,,Re3.014,Pr it i • 2 AT, ,) i x PA *Er '''''''°1°I-117:1 ''S"01= (..&.1 li If 2 E: a' Esi E , ...x.t...c.oe... — - ------- — r-11 1---"---- 1-__i_L-=---- ®BUS LANE EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION ®BUS LANE PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION C3.02 I ..........____ • __________ _. _____ ,-,;) , „ .::..s.:-, _ _....... , ___, GRAPHIC SALE M FEET a>,_ _� - r T U S H I E _.. _... _ .. ......._.y_ — _! ......_._ MONTGOMERY 1V� °I �.r.^'. '1/' "t1 ARCHITECTS 1 s---1.,-..-------,- ,,.II 1 1 . Ilse >, °v_ -- ---:•:--__11---,-;.----,-.-_ ----z--_—,•`-`,-,---- _ _ -,T, >,-,-- 1 y', Ir ;h \II I, �.. , of I �Ir •�•.f� ,.•••,�,�M1 ,. �\ , - Kimley>»Hor n - I �. 'il�. � :"/ .. 1 / r/ 1 v w` ° em eeD\; 416 ea0ED °' \ i i ri 1 .~ p t ,1 �1 �` ...>o\ /�. emu - ,1�1 t JI/>^L 'i I Q ewnx �1 -w uD-v ., <, 1 S' C In 1 1 v 1 O In u, \ 1 1 °� �w SS 1 I � • \r .� \+ I O �Ev • 411 / .. •. mow. iI, `\ \\\ `,. / 1/I I�/' 1tr l , GRADING PLAN NOTES > '�.. NN-,...,,,,,:k `�[+'''.�` L. /', o ow.Eo..ttomm. a a� \ I �,DwDe°� °E� ° ,,, 1 } 2,==.1====.4r,=="'"' .. � o.�E° °.Du„D Dem„ ,wa b �,�, .�e,owes»K,�„u»ee�pero,»e„»»,��,e�MHm awaG.,n��.,,,e� meow,.�wau..�o »�.�..�E,,.,.n,�,m°°Da<�me,o�„e»ee°P,DeDD=���e / ,e �H �H��..�.�,.a �K�„own o.»�� a \•.� � if e oo.,,,Ro,n,,,. .Esse,w»,..»wao»,,.MD:re°,K„ ,w,. \ ,y 1 '' ' J{fi/- \`�, l' `N `Z' ,---i ', r1 , (1/ It J lrsu.t• �� � t. ,w�.ea.r, • ear''' D» D,�en°lEir'.wmea� D»,DEo / 'r' r , 11/ u�DeDeEDDeD. Ew„T» / �( i 1j t —__LEGEND — PROPERTILVE ,..o,,.,ro°.a,..,:D»:..,00:t;',=»Doti»E°orew�E o r 1-. /' / / ill ' I I I 1� II ' P''''''''''''''” i „ »e„u,Mx D.e cussewonca.,e usEwunmuunomee '� �'` Ix/' '� n J� 1 1 I i 1 � 'j ' ,1 • /r+ ' _ _ m�eR.,..eE ,,. .' r <`i V . . u , ;' 1 ..,_�� 1 ',i I, exo.�osPo,a�,.KK. »o,mEr.,o.. oe . j 1 • j j ' 1I r_. 11 xxxJ` ^P 0,71::::::‘,1 e».,r„o,E.DEeDe�,amDOH.,..o.,.oEeo,.oRoee.,oeEsoo..,. / -/ i 1 X11 i. . 1 Ii ,1 i ... Ic049 • fir r �,r , 11 \ .i f /� z.-'•"%;• 1 / / ./r i .1 r ,I1 I / , f ;)?:X/ r / r /r r rr.:xaumo '� nx” r t /%r I 'i GRADING&DRAINAGE �J I,(\,„::„, •ii #° 1 I: ` PLAN L � '_. i 1 / �� / %� C4.O1 I .....,,,, , (411) .' rD !rgr..,„cp--05- ti_Li_r-,..,--.74,7-7,,- _,,,,, —___,_.-—1i..,,,,---4-—— 0 r,,•.1„-,,,-1 W 66TH STREET ... (CO. RD NO. 53) .._.... ' 0GRAPgC SCALE IN HET. TUSHIS I Imd I j- ------—--—--,-----,:7-7---—-------.7, ; ' l',?..,- -.—.,..,--- MO N KG°ME R? , '' „,. ';; ARCHITECTS --__...._— —,, ,__..._ ..,,.. ''''-'2, I.1:,-:i''IY" F°T... '"7 rir—----- 'rt- rtr," ri .-- - - ".t- tr,-.Tr-rtirlD i" ':-'1•122.-= r-r--r---rr.---,,r,...„. :,,,--Trr.,i4, --;.--7.7.."-r-tr:=,r-3-----.._ :z1:-,-,,,,,77.:-,;:-_,..-3cT5tr-,r-r,,,r-r--.., ,, ,,,,, ,,,, . , , ..., 1 r r . -------::-_-:- ---------.. -.Tr,. ... i rk- 1 i ....___ 1 r, _--- _ __ ,. No 1 ris. Amp low 4iiiviumisibirpi .--. .., -s, , \\'‘ ,, . .,;- ' 2::, .:,..',-.1.,0,,::1: Ills..,,,,-.(.`\ ;, •:',:.,„1,,'..‘ ,. ,,, , , ....,. .,, Kimley*Horn 1 1 I 1 j 1,,,,,,,,,,,,,-, 1,, 1 ,T ,‘\\ ",,,.,t$''''. 'i' ., ,•,, ,-'',••••::::•i'v;,,', ....--,„,,,,,,..- , - , , , —--"-'" i II If 0041570 0 , ‘).,!A\CI:\ V41. /' ..'"'..A'-'' ' /.4 Fi.,,t'O':C. F,' o. '''''r9/ I , „„,,,,,,,T,...T,,Qcv. , , ictk -,, ,,,-,,,,,,,,,.4, ,,,, i,„„, nmr,---r----------I r r Njivr, I >„ =r,:,rm,=,-,-- \f‘'.-,',/, --, :: cy cn CD --,,.. \\ se`C: \ ''''',' \ ° EiliFiRREE---\ . 52 IS OF O. )1 j IA ,r ,,,,, D > o , \\\''..- .. ,.. - " ' ri,,,,,,,r''/' rIZr..V !' (..) " ,. , '' .. ,., , le; :, 41„ /I/ 41...%-RWOICR" . 2;',1g.g: / r r , \ '•,,,94( k..12'''''.Z 1/' ...:, . . /.,,,' 0• ..,r- ,, r4B:1...\7.114\SiT"'65''''') '''?„4 \ ' a Lt OF r---t41 !.. 41:FIRCOPOSFO FFLECO•1 ROWE ,:, ii 0 ,, '',(- o 0 ii s'-., 0 C \- ,./...tr---,-..... t :12-aci•o i /i .1.7%,A --::ri C:I' •! CD 1 , E ---', ,, :' 7./----,' .. , .. .' -- i,,if -•-..„,. i .- / = / „,sceftios zeful------______,,,,A\ 5 ''':\ - , tie Ai441„net wnotw; ' 1„11,;',.... UTILITY PLAN NOTES / , . .... ... '. r... \02' .'''' !./.,‘ MVO.,FOR, il ,..- \ ' °°"`XOTTor==olo7r'iroorrixoororro \ "°`"°''.°°°"°`°°'° \Cc-\'',-----\•,';''''''''.1`.'''''••:'x's ..,/-''. \\x‘ .•/' Folloiroi°26"°:'" \ MoratioToLcr.Vrarilo ' \ ''', X x.‘,1:.'..... '•:‘‘\ / \ .,. BOODOO SAIlliAlit 073 3 41 iv, r„N.,IO.<.. /r-1 . ence..,.rM-AT.t'..E-.'T.„riil,..k...'.'''.r,'.44;t:1:<s.,":"'1.cct,r.c,-,o'r,:.',''t3'.r;..-'...,'.°z',-'r-.t-.-44•--„S1re,P.,.7:--iPi•'.1 iM.F.' 9,r 1 4 \\ , ik 2/ ,..r.c. rrr 4 / -.,,' ,cw,...,,,LE:„MOO I/WOW MN 00.0 , ..\ \ •woy5 oo 1 . RO1,079 8 ' It 11 lr'r' ....„.....,,.._____. ,, i t"ta"In rrr 0\..,---\----t7t-- 'ri ;.' ,.-_,,_ 0.0a,../.0....• \ e' 77•=“2.0 t% \ ill .' 1.1110••••• 'Z.•=r:frt,===7"''''''''''''''' \ / / / I / -' ,./../,,,6 '.A% ---V I, ;i/ " , .,,, A / / . / f / 4 ', 1 .• . 1,q , 1 1.., i ,, ifl;1:7.'i °•,.,.':'. ' "Eio'ofrEorLo7,24====irgn7== / / / / ' ' 'Oil li,i'' FA r . . . • lAo Ix, . il t, 1,i -g=,:rarammtzgrzgrz,"= , / ,,, c,t 1 i -va—ros—ros- poopos,00pso.00 I / , d "Jlt& ,___ ,,,, • i; 1 , ,„ i !., .., 7______ /• p .,. <,4,. o ; ic. ‘,., .-. UTILITY PLAN ___I \ , . tI ," , 1 tt Cam . ... . : 1 . 't'• . . .______... • J • ' amm...................o.....................m......wmllrrlltb, . a 0 TUSHIE .`". MONTGOMERY W 66TH STREET (CO. RD. NO. 5 3) 0 0 ARCHITECTS 7645 TYNDALE AVENUE SCUM. 41 CO WWWWOLIS WHILLSOTA 55423 40, 0 0 0 if o o • . immummig 01.' " 11111 . • , IA . 0 _____ .. . PARSONS . . _Cop re" r, ipio mil tillo 5960 Main Street NE . . eilLn nve 3 2, II . . :. '., .: c,-' 4 ° 0. , I1 , . .. ., ci. I. -11 : ..1 .-. ' „'. ' 1,\ ' ' ' -. - " :" . O'‘• N, - ''''''', . . . r11411;)%hk\\T: ,, ,Lr_i ,,,, . Ir.. ,,s,,,..„s„,„.„ . PhOPP.:170:1;571.31::20 r.(76W 57T,ETS Cl) -0 -0 .n (1)LC) Q.) 0- co . . .. ..,, . . .... :,, .[.....—.7 . T .... -7..s•:476-r--'S.-74' -.up'-••11110 . PRIPAWS FOR. ., t / ALL ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGWEERING CL/MPL.99,A„,c,_,J4,9 A'CLPTOWW909.962,92.0=P.,.'',/-6,L,77'7 2=T:,P,c?•:Ont'a% 111114. .., : ,, ........ ....a WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF 1 'W •••====.. 1 t: :=== :tn.;w :at t!..46r4 gIlinnSIWITItT ArgiB'RVBZ 11 L I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN PRE- ti I' r PARED BY LIE OR UNSER MY DWECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A PAP LICENSED fUTCHITECT LINDER/HE LAWS 11 I 17. .-V-Z 1 1 LL 4=w4r •FL. .44*..w..,*..„...,,, OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA II \\ WERATUEL Ill NO\ \\\ 4/ t• L L .. / 4rA=Ww."''' TwWwWNIMPWA9 •7=4 W... ....r' '....."' CreliTAI6:wowpw ' i \ 0 m . ,. . ..- Luminaire Schedule \\\ / t . S.'''' 1 n3' 1"A0'2 1 A8.0 1"Ca CfrEr I rt 3:4 A:L''''L'''''' 1 L.0:11 5 0.i Eci'17,i 001 0 I 1 C,0 c=C=I;.= LH1 88 SINGLE ',3430.‘j ... "•••• 111/\\ ; /111°"v. .16 • • .. • .. . Label EMMY 130,31)2lop MIMING LOI_Top VIM AVENUE TOP 1' Calerme lium.nance illumlname 1 e 3.23 6.1 0 7 4 61 8 71 1 7 r0v0g7 I MIL: 1"0 0. 1 AN:"" 1 M11 8:"" WOW?' L . 1•40. 1\014 001451ft‘iC / /* SITE LIGHTING PLAN / N. ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN I4) 18 t• 0 0 SCa.E:1".3o..o• -. 1 -E101 1 • ,.„ . ,- .ZF ............. ¢q sa (RR,SAI ' 1221 N (9 R W GGTt1 STREET 61 FRG 1,1 ICG (3)NArf (H!))FRG 1Tt D MI 13)Al I I 0/MJ 112)NM/ Ill Aa (2)NMI 15)Mn 12)DNS C'' 1 iwl i,, 'x" ..? .TlOr s I a I1 AtD -.- II,/DK 'e 041441,1", pp /y�`` -ii nun ` (,~p�0�0 t 4!' __'�Ot` I 1 000 ��1 •'EA�12+�� ) TTr �IK'?' �V. .,.. R1_I _(— ��- ra••''^•�.�I� ,eoi000;��� `I R ,rte x' « rr ei� ►!% "*iF:enl:.. \ 16,Da , ��� • \ 3,--_, f 1 r11 D AS /�� C 1 1 ® 1 )T (0) 3G rDiAf '�' —1 r a)AID ) (' Ts 16 TS, , x5B`NG RUM._ t\I ,^ ?•c�"� e00000 00 \,� r o)cu 61xs AI II '. 161 Ry w oeoo o n;33e 3/� \ ✓ s I6� �I �\\ \'\ \ `� list AEu. l5)MP l 1 c 1:)Nn1t !) i\ �(231 FRG \ •V w'I • 'RR . 121 NAM ` �, +. v� y I F_ RG (n O ENTRY FOUNDATION PLANTINGS II,3, A GALL >r 1201 rR � �� �v_ " ,/4" Ili f 1 11 N ( ..L' } Q I) MD I II R_G / � '1 1% •/ pn lel NAN I I) Q / BIA EXISTING PARK,I.,LOT ()B ID nMt II NM On N,nr U N l•5 \; OVERALL'CANTING SCHEDULE I \ �pO , / 1 .K ., I :. m Aro < ,/ o 114I IRG lI/A herr Accu�r s y racy, s inert,/T.we a C / ( ) ►••j s • API aaVv-A- 4w- -0 iiiiii040 OiNWOr ,1411 4 .-)., IF, 1 41-47II-LA:t. 44 4 .t w.,,• ,,y4,4• 44,4..,4.1„, A_)0 916.41111.0,4441,A,„a.,,__ „'(=t_A, , „. ...... i'' 'Aft,''- '' ''',,V..‘i 6010 liflo0.40tirirell.44#,,r Voi.;;, 6440400.1.1,W,,AlglISIP,4040:*4-74."fitir, ....nozom e tin •. ---4x : , , -.14.4:024.4%.4m0.0Aggrcrie,..****-..4.1 _ _ ... . „tv,Avkagt:4•00,. z\ Isiaro*-7, ,,,r., 8 ' 661 858 (341 SAI a.,NM II •%, ' *.-1 40.,A 0 i I I' i 001 8.58 : N (7,FONDATION PLANTINGS-SOUTH _____ al I.,..,„4 DCAL8 i •i t)0 0 5' 10 20( 40( I '' - ,(1 ----"--'---49:40 ':' ',,,,4.111.7"Ittiori I-4.- - .0I0._ '0- °ase=0l', * 11 - FOUNDATON PLANTS WEST 000000000 20. 40, CND 1 -a.' li N410-- 1 l -----jr--'- -51 -4-17C-1_ , -- _ — FOUNDATION PLANTING SCHEDULE N (--,-,FOUNDATION PLANTS-NORTH 10( 22 4D 1685 1 1699410.99,6,‘4 16 19815.41949 FA a,. I Co") C.. / I I . . , , . . '—'''---- a— - iTRITAII--- • gp. '.".-VIERVIIIMITO M I I la,, , AM , TMINEW 41C±.11 .0 ..09 AREA &VP 10:011).0 .o.., Elltailk14.1311=1__-,(-- — • I 0A-M-41•30-C4 MEV ger-, Nlir ' my . , SOUTHDALE CENTER-NORTH CONNECTION _ _ Leitui SOUTHDALE CONNECTION PLANTING SCHEDULE 2ea ‘) \\ ,N\NN N\ N."\-N, ,NN i N - iffillb, ' , '1'AM -• . ''' Al:,..' /'' D I G 0 OM I L.—.— I I z, 901.01-1DALE . i .i ' / 1686 113 114ortner Accuirialu 1,6)4AI 13 tai per Bau..1 5., I •l44 '- -orkoaramo , . . .-,..., -_ - --- . 1--------___1,--- W '`.- -"--- -:..-47 „r,HA„ • — ,A,r, (9,A D / / ,-;-. SO THDALE CENTER-SOUTH CONNECTION T „...0 kzy sCALE 1,6=i 3 al)8 0 8 16 32 69 ...-) Homewood Suites A1.3 - Enlarged Landscape Plans 13 T U S H I E ATI VTIWNIYS — NOBLE 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 UNIT MIX BY TYPE />a ... ` .�`,. .� a QUEEN ACC.I aErt KN..,, I `� __ -_ ._ E SiC KING 5 n o�b re fI I. -11O 1.-11�6E� -41-10_ _ i •- - �Illllll�r� 71�" \`�`1``~� k,.X �\\ U„e BEDROOM SUITE ,s ` v\ IyI snoio uGr ooue� oo NG Ki„ DOUBLE - NG %IWO s Y OUf E 1U01 srUDro UUEfu E N00 sr UP �,�j�'.`} Imo: \i�\ \ re % ' 1 UNIT MIX BY TYPE-HOTEL su s re sure suirE sure s r° Ulif �..•- �� A\ I b„�, ��s ``,A• o �I� i I ' i � � i �'�.•--'r BED DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE % 1ST FLOOR II i I sruoio Smoo iOiD a G 1 F.1 NG aeo Eo ��� ��� yt BES ROOM K 3 OH) stump SU BUNG KILL . �,� BED KING SUITE 6 4% 1ST FLOOR sure re u . DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 3 2% IST FLOOR _ ,��MI.�•� m'l �i �• ' 'J ��-ms ,%/ KING STUDIO SUITE 6 I % IST FLOOR _ �• ��� TWO BEDROOM SUITE 7 — - �� '• /� \� �\ I % I S7 FLOOR �F T 27 27 I 886 1 -BED DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 3 2% 2ND FLOOR \ �j}i 1 j 1-BED KING SUITE IIS � � \'�-�� d"� �� \\'L �, DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE I0 7% 2ND FLOOR ��.��\\ ,; �,p ��� �� IIII ,1 II 3 2% 2ND FLOOR 4 �� / KING STUDIO SUITE 22 15% 2ND FLOOR v�j Al fly�, ��' ) j If TWO BEDROOM SUITE N 4'•, ti-\ \-74 / I Li I% 2ND FLOOR f \\ \\ � ``\ I! �I 39 39 27% i,E �_/ �\ 1 \V, 1 A I- I, �. I-BED DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 2 % 3RD FLOOR _- .,I�, ) ,� ''''/ z~' /\\\\\ «� //,,/ -BED KING SUITE 13 9% 3RD FLOOR j � �� �✓ A AV � l�j /,✓ /r ACC BED DOUBLE QUEEN 7 (To• 3RD FLOOR f.�fi �{ I mo\ '\, A I ��;�, o SUITE'B :I; 13 7 \ 'S s Re EFooMs ~ �/ i ACC.1-BED KING SUITE % 3RD FLOOR '�\ Id �I / I ACG.KING STUDIO SUITE 1 _ '� ' `w� t \\\T‘,.._„/ S �/ =Y 3RD FLOOR r DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 3 2% 3RD FLOOR \ 1\ \\� KING STUDIO SUITE B 2% 3RD FLOOR ,_.�\\ z•/„..,,Ji sure 9EU /ICJ 6 � ,.'% TWO BEDROOM SUITE I % 3RD FLOOR _ 'To,---/-'/--'‘7`) ,•`�� V ///��/ KNG rr�^Y �� v. % h�i� a 1. r 40 40 27% I% 9.� �f /, '' KNG �� �, / _u;0 7., I a j -BED DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 3 2% 4TH FLOOR �`�@ �V \��� /�a �r� J 1 ill 1 1-BED KING SUITE 13 9% 4TH FLOOR \ \. ,, ure 5 f �� i"i DOUBLE QUEEN SUITE 3 2% 4TH FLOOR vrte KING STUDIO SUITE ,,_ �\,\ ///,,\\ "�� \ ` JI 20 14% 4TH FLOOR \�`\ ��\ N Gsmo o�/ 1`f I n� TWO BEDROOM SUITE I I% 4TH FLOOR f4,1 ii1\ ��� \\\� � 4D /� �, SU iE'+ 1 ( p 40 27% �� /. j\ \�:� K iti�>// /i /E/ SII X11 ✓' \ , Iglu / 1' Grand total 145 00% a '! ”. �i (/ ��- .. _ , Gross Square Footage •\ % / st Floor 28,927 sf I�\ v\\ �v `,_i/ / 4' i� l 2nd Floor -26,188 sf '',//\''s / �� `• 1 /` / r`' , 3rd Floor 26,943 sf \\ J %\ ( / '% /� 4th Floor 26,943 sf \ ' \~ ✓ \\ ' I� / 41 Total Q9,00I sf \\,--\\\\ f r. J v�I I �. N \1\ y/ �� 4NY� ' / 10„2n Ba Y \\ ti /// �/ GI 1` t� i R /; ' „ \ a kii, , II ° Homewood Suites Al - NOBLE 6 Ground Floor MONTGOMERY ARCHITECTS 600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 h. g I1 8E0 KING KING DOUBLE DOUBLt 1110 KING DOUBLE DOUBIE RING KING KING I-BfO i II 'SrUDID SUUp SUITE SUITS S1UIT? 9 UIT? SU SUITN STUDIO SUITE0 9SUITE KING SU Itt SUITE SUITE 5 tt s NE SU TE SUITE 5 Itt SUITE SUITE SU Itt SUR[ ♦„ \\\\ S.',, AU,: 1 RING KING 11k0 I -DED GNG 4 -BED I BED GNG RING SeTrO \ r5UO1O SUOIO BEDEDOM RING STUDIO III sTUDq RING RING SUDR) Tur .. SUITE \ SUITE SUITE SURE SUITE SUlif I SUITE SURE 5UItt SUITE SUITE . . \ 1 ` ♦ wEEN1 5Utt 1 > BED sr. Uo1O I . DOUBLE \11 1 DOUBLE URE ♦ 1 SUITE _BED tt ♦ ♦ SKUNG I.BED TE RING KING 1 ♦ SUITEgigh S11.010 UI E E I I 1 II puG 1 1 SURE eED ': 1 UT -BED ,' 1 SKUNG /1 BED /� / U I-Sf0 I 1/ u 1 •` 'l RNG i STUD UITED NG ' //, cruor, `\ KING SUITE S // 5 siuD o SUITE s uoo // // \ / STUDIO / / 1 SUITE i \ // // 7 \ // \ / \ // N I/ N D 10' 2/5 90• aO' Ifl TUS Homewood Suites A1.7 - 2nd Floor t1 H 1 E I , 11� GOMERY nrscTurEcTs NOBLE I 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/2016 • I NG B. DOUBLE B� DOUBLE SWO 0 USKDU O.ESL SMO ONG BINGTU O r EBL I SNG RING \\ I SUIT£ SUITE SUITE UTE SU rtf I SSU E Df DORING RI , u ifE UITE SUE S SITUITE BED' ♦ SUITS \ -_- I SONE ♦ 2 \ BED " I RING RING aro RING RING BED - RING �\ \ SlU°IO S uo U tEE SURE SNOq S 11 SUI E INNG SU it SUOE 110 SUOE \ I SU SUIfr SUM M SURE SU tE Su1TE R E . ♦ � I-BED \\ I .t DOUBLE UNE ♦ DV N I ) smTE BED *� 11 DOUBLE 50 It ' ♦ OUffN s SUITE ♦ I ``-1 7-• RIN� I -BfD SUrtE NG ♦ SUR E „us, DKING fD I salt I I i ' / I Dlo uuc su .� -BeD ie I' / sr S i I \ SBN�° BED , 9U , / E � .... SUfI£ RNG / ` { I SNBIO , / ....... \ DD 5 RluculrE / SN STUDIO SUITE N / \ RING -..1 / su°O w� I / \ / ii ts \ / s. _ N I T ce 10' 20 40 , '�, Homewood Suites Al _ 3rd-4thrU9H1E •� FIOOr ARCHITECTS °' NOBLE ARCHITECTS CT3 6600 York Ave, Edina, Minnesota 55435 02/29/20161 [11 H--7 5-, — l ti • f I � \ �.._14::5, Oji K. 1. P� 11S 1.,' .v_- �?�l •��N d — I I i 11 •1bi��-.)' ", �' N, ` 3:1T: , l � 1 qm 1 ..,,,,E.T , 1 ( it_ ;,, , 11114 ,a,„ec...r,r, ccA". __\,_ y__..1, L.3.„... :,..r. .0-4, a 1111 1,-- as 1-7_1: mil i 11 1\c, u - IAM .1. Its - .1-� i .i IMI 11 N,'.. Pam•1 `i /414; - ______.,--),1 ' AIM t4 r — ...,,,,0, , 17-3.7.....7,...4. ..7.,:••16-.2' X62 � �� t ��� \, _• �, • 11 11/4 11I{ ,69 ti �/ ( x t A i 1 � ' ' ill mire i �y ,_ r ) (2/, ■ 1 r ��� )L - x n. d, ° f • ) , , -�` 1i ;i.),i,,: J' „J r � 1 1 _ cfl yd Il iia P l�. i _ . Legend Existing ---- Future ._.. Future .... Future .... Future Sidewalk State-Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk Nine Mile Creek To School Sidewalk Regional Trail N 491f W+E 0/0 1. City of Edina s (©LIiw°° Engineerng Dept •,_�..�.�; 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update t Sidewalk Facilities November2014 fl g—a Cdvo clu.na, LJ S.I ooh Weber Field Paxkcsiiden l, delka Years hlo I I: ¢din qa'y' so Alden Todd Park I{ kcje[in Park Park M •lane}Ace Division St 1` flmyendale I ,, Park Shepard el Q Van to Hill, 1 ,' Lutheran Valkenburg Park - I 1 dnchen Did or i° Woodd 81itc pmt 1 -. - -.4U VVillian s Park •i.capal 50th Si W• Park t Ern Cin- H- Ulel' Covenant Highlands Highlands n.11(71 ^„ >hParl' f, Lake Park I Frank °t Topa J , Fox Park } _ Meadon Pubf ^�': Cahuvd Arden s` Park ' Shemnlikood Our Lady of i : Park church i 3:t Grace Cherish g o P pso ' ar .Schooll I _ .Golf Ter o o mim igimismemm. FIihlanJ Edma t..'_-• �S Pters Lateran .mC Chavch&School • York saooi r Harvey Lutheran c8nia 11 Lake Park Garden n'ooddele Park / see Havykcs church Lake oU Elementary 0 Norinandale ': .l' _ Choyven b �c0od <, Melody e J High Park `.. autl Walnut ,,,o s r,h Lake h h south,ice (I1hEtaa ry 4 igthSt W X 5 tge e- 1 un Pack c n,m ' ante ,=.6., ek .16 Geo e` B nton Are d. i ®r Tingdalc Chapel Bredesen Ca Sada Park co�NU 'S1 Johns Pamela noir, # Park 6. scnoal ,Park Park c.,;u0na1 ., dale Lie U Liliaan g i� o x k, _ aal I,re Lake G Kraig Ip Pamela Hill C' Mud Lake "a R' c.i ;fi' k 3 62nd St W ACounlrysidc '" Slmchauer + Park 4 I�YEwG CWaniil ,Fire l� -a .63rd St W ' Park Cross,..;e j 62 charm Ft" ee"n .,'yV I wheatCreek Valley Parts �, Creek Ville" [ Arra.head school +n=a®�� en. ValleyLn ��, 152 or dP�rnd w cha t77 �,I f J la `� Normandahc Roslar'M�♦ 1 o. t„.,_,,,, Park 66th Sr W Lake Park t,� 66th Sr V.' / / Edina ar �4. (L''''f High r fi� ® Cornelia '' 5 huo ! : 1 t: r. 41, Si Albans Vnll I/ ' Ery i3nit;h 14%1 _- 0 ,al � C o I Valley Viee•Rd Indianhead park c,•, - C Lake cileaq _ _ 0 - N .p Lutheran _ y St e mck. _ i6 McGuire C z �, 69th Sr W m Catholic olic Park .� ci n u I, o 70th Sr W e, doPresbhc ,N L 70th St b }li.! •J. S Arneson i 1 c g Acres c�ua i Park School Bristol • 6� Camelia Park t Hilary La 71. _ Park 7 E 11q E'a si#RS7�: Le s ..,re:,� n tl •" SOiA Braemar Park and Golf Course Park II Yorktotli n Dee ed'Hill Rd h • Lake LI Pm}g (Courtney Fields) 74th St W C 100 , Parkin,n Aa ll s ; 8 �zA Q cc�Q Pubic Wrks RES1 ii 1 Park Maintenance tl C ce ? I. EA es a d % Fred Richard mk 76th St W u Rues nine Ct.', _ Go ti -'r'.oifCe?../J a 77th St W 1_J tA...o u ch 7S[h St W PM i, Minnesota Dr • • Bicycle Facilities Bike Routes(signed and/or marked as) Advisory Bike Lanes Bike or Shared Use Paths 9'r�r •i IN Bike Boulevards e'�Green Shared Bike Lanes N ow(�®��s Bike Lanes ®Shared Lane Markings W..E JC®. }o Signed Bike Routes Approved Primary Route Approved Secondary Route s Engineering nuary2016Pt Jaj /O.-... O:\+lsers\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.mxc 4 69 --':*".'.k”.f•,,,:',:---':-;.- . , . ....z..... , 0 • l' -1 , =. II ii' 1.' .... ... . ..=.;•1, r.... •"•'.,. cl ' - .•. ' ••-•:;--: --.- - ':','''•'''''l•...,',1'.: 1.,-,' , . ' 'I, . . - - - - 0 - • 4 . ,.. . . . . . . . . - ...--. . .. ... . . , 'jerk A. -•:: g .„..... . ......, -• ••••_---:_ i,,r , _•,,,,., • ,. ,:„..„.....„.. 40 _ ,..,:,,,,,•„.., ...:.„...„6„.,,,: :..„.7,;.,...„ .. _,., 444 „. ,,,,,. . ....„.,:„ •.,-.„- --ii-,,,-.,---!Nt,- N' ' ' ''''' , , • • " , ". ,' ". ' ' - ,. . „., ..„. ... ......... ... ... . , ...... , ,. ,.,.... „ , ... .„... , , # ' '-• • r' - ION. 4111OP ..;,:i;.,,••,.., •'-.4', ),--- :"`!".'''.",'•'-- , ' ' ,..*: •,- •, k. ..4 '.1 •..,. lit 444,- . I'1Wig' -ftwev'" .,...... .- , -..., VW -aleiii...4rAilirimilo' , • _ - ,....• . . . .;. -. • , . ...... . ,.. - . . . _ ,.. . _ ,•,-,VL ;. vimur , :,,..,-;;. 'Ilk ' 41" ''.. ',..," :Xli , '&. II- 4- ,.......,,....s: .... . ... . _ ktoft _,,:At--,:,:-- : i-ft .4-': '.:,-.'e. ..- . •,.. " -,.,,,• . , _•,..,- • .. . .• . i -,...4. i,,, •I Al, '' A i, . . . . ...., . , ... , , . . . .. „.. . . . . . . ..., , . . , 7. '..'..• ..41;;;Y'.... 4`' t %- ''' ' - - - 't irati, -7'*-‘,..,"•••;:' r t-• ,. . .. .... .,•,.•.••,,,,,,,,. .• , • , dv,• . ..,,,,, • hi'.*' ••'•'-,--' d ''..'- '''-''' • .,. : -.• • . •,,:,..i...,„. ,•-•, •.•,• •,,,i,, •-•• • , ,,.‘, : • ,, -,. ,.•, - - -,,,T••••., , , ,, . . !...._.,1 . .r")t ;ilr'"-. . . ...i. ;.::,.i...:;;;;-.#.0'..,-‘• . • : *#'1 ..,., 7 47...,'.....-,,,,' / , 4, . ,e,..„„ t‘tio, r !, ,i-,• . ,... _ .,.. •,„ ' 1' '' ,. ... , . -4 , . .. '''" • / \ 1 .., .' -,4.., '., / N.. ".*\N, ' i•- , . -s,'..-• ',.,,.--. ,,._ ..... . . i ,, . ....;„..„ ,..„.„.,„,.....,,,. ..- ,.,... . .,, .„, .„,„,...„: .,. ....„, . .,. '••• '-ii•I. if-;-:`,-.-,•;eri AL" ; sip •,-?,',ii..,,.:4-0,:,;'-'.-‘..- :,...,,4, - 4 k VW , ..., / • „,,, t ..,ii # • 44; \ ' '',1 ,,... . ../. — I Vy .... .---- i_./.... . * . -• 4.. ....... ' k . ,.... , .. . . , ,, . .._ ,. ., . .. . . . . . ... .. .. .,. .. .. ..... . . ..... . ,. . - 4 - ' .'• -4-4..-,- . -••,' .0..,'•• .,, 1/ # ..; rri •,...,.. 7,-_,,,, -- Cary Teague From: Jeff Siems Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 10:46 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6600 York Avenue South Cary, Here are the fire department comments regarding the site at 6600 York Avenue South: 1. Fire department access is compromised. Recommend removing parking stalls to allow circulating traffic for fire department vehicles. 2. Move proposed fire hydrant from East side of property to the peninsula nearest the main entrance facing the mall. 3. FDC to be aligned with handicap access lane. 4. Will there be a generator? Jeff Siems, Fire Marshal Edina Fire Department 952-826-0337 I JSiems@EdinaMN.Rov M-S 1 414. O C�'® Jpi DATE: April 6, 2016 TO: 6600 York Avenue Street Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague— Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner P.E. - Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk— Engineering Technician RE: 6600 York Avenue— Development Review, Homewood Suites The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil drawings dated 2/29/2016. Details 1. A developer's agreement will be required. a. Plat public easements or transfer fee ownership of dedicated public right of way. 2. Update standard plates to 2016 plates. Survey 3. A proposed site survey is required. a. Show all easements, public and private (Metro Transit Easement). 4. Apply for vacation of existing easements if needed. Provide confirmation that private easements have been vacated. 5. Describe easements or transfer dedicated outlets for public sidewalk and any public utilities. Living Streets 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 7. Provide for ADA ramps at bus only exit. 8. Provide 5-ft minimum width sidewalk along western limits of property (along east side of one-way northbound access road). 9. Provide 8-ft width sidewalk with 8-ft blvd along York Avenue and 66th Street. Traffic and Street 10. Maintain sidewalk access during construction. I I. Clearly denote private paths or sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. 12. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. 13. Roadway light fixtures along York Ave or 66th Street shall be consistent with York Ave and 66th Street structures. 14. Building access roads and entrances will need to accommodate a ladder fire truck (turning template included). a. I 5-ft minimum corner radius most likely required for ladder fire truck turning. Noted 6-ft radius shown on plans. 15. Accessible parking stall calculations and locations need to be noted. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 � �, pp _32�e .,I 16. Show proposed pavement markings for Southdale Access Road. Sanitary and Water Utilities 17. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. 18. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. 19. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 20. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 21. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. 22. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit. Wet tap to occur at night. City staff to be present to inspect, cost to be paid by developer. b. Verify permit requirements from Hennepin County for access in their Right of Way. c. Separate meters for fire and domestic services will be required. Storm Water Utility 23. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report. Work with city consultant at Barr Engineering to assure downstream capacity. 24. Provide more detailed information for retention system. 25. Verify inlet capacity in parking lot. 26. Existing removed storm sewer connections will need to be completely removed to catch basin and bulk headed. 27. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed is required for building permit. 28. Retention system engineer required to verify construction of the underground retention systems done per plan. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 29.A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Other Agency Coordination 30. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits are required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371 •Fax 952-826-0392 ✓�*-7 • Southdale Homewood Suites Traffic and Parking Study For: ti A�•'►r r te.1-.Att j ''� t City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55024 • April 6, 2016 Prepared By: WSB WSB II■■IMIL WSB &Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55416 CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ( 4:4‘," Charles T. Rickart, F.E. Date:April 6, 2016 Reg.No. 26082 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 PAGE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 CERTIFICATION 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST of FIGURES /TABLES 3 3 INTRODUCTION /BACKGROUND 47 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS 10 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS 10 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 21 MULTI MODAL REVIEW/ANALYSIS 25 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS 27 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS LIST of FIGURES / TABLES 5 Figure 1 -Location Map 56 Figure 2 -Proposed Site Plan 9 Figure 3 -Existing Conditions 14 Figure 4- 2018 No-Build Conditions 4 Figure 5- 2018 Build Conditions 1516 Figure 6-2040 Build Conditions Figure 7 -Level of Service Ranges 16 238 Figure 8- Sidewalk Facilities 24 Figure 9-Bicycle Facilities Table 1-Additional Background Trip Generation 11 Table 2 - Development Site Trip Generation 11 2 Table 3 -Existing(2016) Level of Service Summary 1920 Table 4-Forecasted 2018 No-Build Level of Service Summary Table 5-Forecasted Build Level of Service Summary 20 250 Table 6-Site Parking Summary 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALEI HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA PAGE 3 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 M - INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to determine the potential traffic and parking impacts the proposed addition of the Southdale Homewood Suites hotel would have on the existing Southdale Center parking, site circulation and the adjacent roadway system.The site is located in the southwest quadrant of 66th Street and York Avenue in the Southdale Center parking lot.The project location is shown on Figure 1. The proposed plan includes the addition of a 146 room, 4 story suites hotel and associated parking in the northeast corner of the existing Southdale Center parking lot.Access to the Southdale Homewood Suites hotel project will be from the existing Southdale Center ring road. Existing access to this area of Southdale Center is through entry and exit driveway intersections on 66th Street and York Avenue.As part of the proposed site improvements the existing Southdale Center ring road will be modified from one-way to two-way adjacent to the site from the Transit Center access,south to the York Avenue Southdale Center Entrance.The proposed site plan is shown on Figure 2. The traffic impacts of the existing and proposed development were evaluated at the following locations. • France Avenue at 66th Street • 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Center Entrance • 66th Street at Southdale Center Exit • 66th Street at Barrie Road/Firestone/Southdale Center Right-in Access. • 66th Street at Firestone/Southdale Center Right-in/Right-out Access • 66th Street at York Avenue • York Avenue at Southdale Center Entrance • York Avenue at Southdale Center Exit/Cub Foods Access The following sections of this report document the analysis and anticipated impacts of the proposed redevelopment. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 s- 1 PAGE 4 Figure 1 —Project Location t I .g ,tp". -.....‹ .. i,A611f.M L+ 4.*' y a \ v+ it ttil 1" ('y!�' $.. tiff,RO 'oi'ar� t N`~ .�s���.\t.,,�,Y4� { .� as �• •': Figure 2—Stite,..Plan:"....11„, . . ,• • CI'iv: .1).‘,. i . . ..., . ,,‘. _,.p.., ., ,,,.-• -., ,.p44- - '''''. i ' • '''.. \ ''' t' ' k i ' t 57 . , ... ,,.. ..... 4 ) I '4; •":.! ,,V'-. c , ';:i.'--..,, .z.,.1;;. ' ": ,N. I ,r,ie." 44•4„,„:?':,. .44. „A * ,„ 1 d'''',,i.i ' ,.• ..'' At•' . ' .:., ' ,e^,,- P , - „,,,,,,, ... „..,„..,,,:_.:.,..,.5. '-'t 1' •'N''.--- ; .,., tAtt I 1 ,,,, i ",.. --,,,- •":!...,-„;.-- ',..'" ,, -.. 4 i t ,,, .,..<,LA•.,.•**. <,,,;(, i ''' ',.1 it ' ''' '4' I " - '' • .' , „. ''''A• ( f ,....., . . . , . , , . „ .. . i . \ , < 1 ' • t. 4 '4- no I-LI Z 6 0 i..4.-e-a .00 00 ro col 4.... c 2 -r3 u ....... C T. •bl) a, 4,21 isa c e ...c c CU C i3.) Zili 4.' 0 C 0W C 5, C ru U .0 LEJ 0 cv — > ,2 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 As 3 PAGE 6 EXISTING TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS The existing lane configurations and traffic control for the impacted roadways adjacent to the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development include: York Avenue (CSAH 31) is a Hennepin County north/south a 4-lane divided Minor Arterial local roadway.Pey access on outhdale Center k Avenue in and adjacent develpment.The poe area of the proposed site is sed speed streets and driveways into S limit in the vicinity of the site is 30 mph.The current Average Daily Traffic on York Avenue is 22,000 vehicles per day(vpd) south of 66th Street and 17,300vpd north of 66th Street. 66th Street(CSAH 53)is a Hennepin County east/west 4-lane divided Minor Arterial roadway. Street access and access to on 66thdJacent Streeias 35 mph.The evelopments are p rovided from this roadway.The speed limit postedcurrent Average Daily Traffic on 66th Street is 11,300vpd west of France Avenue, 14,700vpd between France Avenue and York Avenue and 17,100vpd east of York Avenue. The lane configurations and traffic control at each of the study area driveway and intersection are as follows: 66th Street at France Avenue -Traffic Signal SB France Avenue-one right/through,two through, one left NB France Avenue- one right,three through,one left EB 66th Street-one right,bike lane,two through,one left WB 66th Street-one right,bike lane,two through,two left 66th Street at Drew Avenue/Southdale Center Entrance-Traffic Signal SB Drew Avenue-one right,one through/left EB 66th Street-one right/through,two through,one left WB 66th Street-one right,two through, one left 66th Street at Southdale Center Exit-Traffic Signal NB Southdale Center Exit-one right,two left EB 66th Street-two through WB 66th Street-three through 66th Street at Barrie Road/Southdale Center/Firestone Right-in Access-Side Street Stop SB Barrie Road-one right EB 66th Street-one right,two through,one left WB 66th Street-one right/through,two through 66th Street at Southdale Center/Firestone Right-in/Right-out Access- Side Street Stop NB Southdale Center/Firestone Access-one right EB 66th Street-one right/through,two through WB 66th Street-three through 04/06/2016 SOUTHOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OFHDALE EDINA � PAGE 7 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 AJ` 66th Street at York Avenue-Traffic Signal SB York Ave approaching 66th St-one free right,two through, one left NB York Ave approaching 66th St-one free right,two through,two left EB 66th St approaching York Ave-one free right,two through,two left WB 66th St approaching York Ave- one free right,two through,two left York Avenue at Southdale Center Site Entrance/Development Driveway-Sides Street Stop SB York Avenue-one right,two through NB York Avenue-one continuous right,two through, one left WB Development Driveway-one right out only York Avenue at Southdale Center Site Exit/Cub Food-Traffic Signal SB York Avenue-two through, one left NB York Avenue-one right,two through EB Southdale Center Exit-one free right,one through,two left WB Cub Foods Driveway- one right,two left Peak hour turning movement counts were provided by Hennepin County for selected intersections on 66th Street and York Avenue conducted during the summer of 2015.These counts were supplemented by counts conducted by WSB and Associates in November of 2015 and March 2016. The AM peak hour counts were found to be 20%to 25% lower than the PM peak, therefore, only the PM peak hour was analyzed with this study. These counts were used as the existing baseline conditions for the area. Figure 3 shows the existing intersection and driveway geometrics and traffic control along each corridor that was analyzed as part of this traffic study.The figure also shows the existing 2016 PM peak hour traffic volumes. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 5-5- PAGE 8 Figure 3 -Existing Conditions . 0 to r re K C a 4.. o a ,► 1 ilVI" tt 00 Ce a5 ti ,e 1 r f. tett 4 rt� A 2 k ' a w .. d • 4 OS., CO e a ' It 1 "i o e i c •x a o n . • Y # a i i a a IB a o a 01 it a a o As 11 r . .. ' '' : 4 ar►� 4 a o e�� €". a .• I tit tt = a ` a Y! 11 Li t, ' E: ` a 1 E I a � I o • n__ ti fi E o z 8. in w ° o 41) l { !1 f n G Zcwc s _cA a rt. r ; , a p c0) Ch4 ai r W .5 c . af— N t G (( ' x �s to f— . Ili >" r la + &I 0 ...... 0 o 1 ,r ." ,r" l �� dti G 6 —101 to ... . F 6 .1,. ......—...— ....... .........*........a--- ill LI . 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA As-(/ PAGE 9 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In order to analyze the lane configuration and traffic control needs projected traffic volumes were determined for the area. Traffic forecasts were prepared for the year 2018 which is the year after the proposed site is anticipated to be fully developed and; for the 2040 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The following sections outline the traffic generation, as well as the traffic distribution and projected traffic volumes. A. Background(Non-Development) Traffic Growth Traffic growth in the vicinity of a proposed site will occur between existing conditions (2016) and any given future year due to other development within the region.This background growth must be accounted for and included in future year traffic forecasts. Reviewing the historical traffic counts in the area,traffic has stayed somewhat constant or dropped in the past few years. However,in order to account for some background growth in traffic the Hennepin County State Aid traffic growth projection factor of 1.1 over a 20 year period was used to project traffic to the 2018 analysis years. In addition to the regional background traffic, other specific none development related traffic was determined and included with the overall background traffic for the 2018 traffic conditions. Additional Southdale Center Development- Based on the information received from Southdale Center about the current vacancy rates and plans for renovations,it was determined that following the renovations,the mall would have an additional 143,880 sf of leasable space available. This figure includes leasable retail and food court space. The analysis assumes that all leasable space occupied by 2018. Future Restaurant Development—A future restaurant is proposed in northeast quadrant of France Avenue and 69th Street in the Southdale Center Parking lot. The restaurant was assumed to be 8,000 sf in size with approximately 300 seats. The analysis assumes the restaurant will be developed by 2018. Southdale Residential-The City approved the addition of 232 apartment units with associated parking in the existing Southdale Center parking lot. The site is located in the northwest quadrant of 69th Street and York Avenue. The site was opened in 2014 and based on information provided it is currently 80% occupied.The analysis assumes the units will be fully leased by 2018. 6725 York Avenue (Wicks Site)—The City approved the redevelopment of the Wickes Furniture site at 6725 York Avenue including 242 multifamily residential units and 13,980 sf of retail uses. The site is located on the west side of York Avenue between 66th Street and 69th Street across from Southdale Center. The analysis assumes the site will be developed by 2018. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 /.�s-7 �r / PAGE 10 • The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site) -The City approved the redevelopment of the former Best Buy site located south of 66th Street between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue.The proposed site redevelopment included 210 multifamily residential units and a 1,760 sf coffee shop. The analysis assumes the site will be developed by 2018. DLC Residential Redevelopment-The City approved the redevelopment of the northwest quadrant of York Avenue and 66th Street. The site redevelopment is proposed to be completed in two phases. The first phase will include 227 multifamily residential units and is planned to be completed in 2017. The second phase will include an additional 145 units and be completed in 5 to 10 years. The analysis assumes only the phase 1 portion of the development will be completed by 2018. The estimated trip generation for the additional background traffic is shown below in Table 1.The trip generation rates used to estimate the additional site traffic are based on extensive surveys of the trip-generation rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour peak hour trip generation for the approved uses. Table 1 -Additional Background Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Use Size Total In Out Southdale Center Additional Development 143,880 sf 533 256 277 Southdale Restaurant 8,000 sf 79 47 32 Southdale One Apartments (80% occupied) 232 units 29 19 10 6725 York Avenue Development (Former Wicks Site) 242 units / 13,980 sf 220 129 91 The Gateway Pointe (Best Buy Site Development) 210 units/ 1,760 sf 205 122 83 DLC Residential Development Phase 1: 227 units 145 95 50 Total New Trips 1211 668 543 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual,9th Edition The 2040 traffic conditions were developed based on the Met Councils projections for households,population and employment within the City and specifically the Traffic Analysis Zones in the Southdale Center area. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 A 5-1 PAGE 11 B. Development Site Trip Generation The estimated trip generation from the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development is shown below in Table 2.The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is also based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. The table shows the PM peak hour trip generation for the proposed development. In addition, it was assumed that all the traffic from the site would be new and that no adjustments were made for dual purpose or pass-by/diverted trips.This also will provide for a worst case traffic condition. Table 2-Development Site Trip Generation PM Peak Hour Use Size (Rooms) Total In Out Hotel 146 80 34 46 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual,9th Edition C. Traffic Distribution Background non-site and site-generated trips were distributed to the adjacent roadway system based on several factors including: • Previous traffic and transportation studies in the area. • Anticipated origins and destinations for specific land use (i.e. location of commercial uses in relationship to residential). • Existing travel patterns. • City's current Transportation Plan model. The generated trips for the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development were assumed to arrive or exit the site using access to 66th Street or York Avenue via modified Southdale ring road system. Based on these parameters the following general traffic distribution was used to distribute the projected traffic volumes from the anticipated uses: • 25%to/from the north • 35%to/from the south • 25%to/from the west • 15%to/from the east • ......................_ SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 A c l PAGE 12 D. Projected Traffic Volumes Traffic wouldforbeestsfu were predeveloped ed for the year 2018 which is the year after the and for the 2040 conditions which represents the City's d site fully develop Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The traffic forecasts were prepared by adding the projected annual background traffic growth and the projected non-development traffic growth to the existing 2016 traffic counts to determine the"No-Build"traffic conditions.The anticipated Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development traffic was then added to the no-build to determine the"Build"traffic conditions.Figures 4-6 shows the projected PM peak hour traffic volumes for the 2018 no-build, 2018 build and 2040 build conditions. • 04/06/2016 THDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES A-6SOUCITY OF EDINA U� PAGE 13 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 Figure 4-2018 No-Build Conditions • $ !Yaw. 'r zr 4-14; h I1 P J li 44 If •c. a o o a C 6 4 h". C o a dl 11 fit # 6b 41 1w t ! r J. a _ C a i p I9; .r t fa 1 'F> a C . ? h t �, ,.. /yam - vii in 4 41 Q r O,ti e F 4tat . . � c f 1 ?t r ' . g . ,,,,, . Iv. ti e ..1 . ......,„: ,:;,... . I a. „ r itt ''' ' h‘'t4; Ili ItCI . /. .` s' 6 1 ;Oftit in :'' C tit . On 4 41 4 U a Ci ar �- 0 C7 CO ?aZ W c c o c ? 0 0 tl ' It e Y CD 1 F 3 CV N9..r ' .s ik V N 0 F o U II-,C •,. J c 6 1— o &Cil, 2 1"--4- ipl'e e A 1 ft t .*"'7"*"'":: ryv. .4? 1 :/.---- ' • SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 PAGE 14 I. Figure 5 -2018 Build Condi;ions ` 0.4 r !V + rent ' S9 rr it' = ' s° ' ii4t G a ! IS %A if Ca ca- a1 #) '11 f r e a e� t; r a� sat 0, N .. M {Naz( _' 0 ' C _ - 41 It- rt 4 a • it ill lt = t gt( , a E f ik. "4„iive.y.i..„,, :::,\ • tr b c r N ~ u W E 0 IR E o au ct �!,< c9 ao h" s r- r O 1 i . t 1 wl 0 d) N G N N d'l! 0 a .;_. z -E- 0 ,7, a ps a 9 1t f CD y c C ti v O YD ' •'' y 76 1 at C 2 •X 42 t e "-4. � * rn t-- a. Ll I Or SO O� Ione la ttnn Ir t•- m 14 J II i<ii it C. a _ s e 3i d 87 �»..«-e.. .. ate, �• 1' iII :1 N. 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA PAGE 15 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 �( Figure 6-2040 Build Conditions t 64 , .. 9 1 w- US y, r fr{ r «t , r �. t a 41 R4 JJ C a a .� , 4 is G « «= 11 1N #t +' C a t J o :1r oz « x131 4OV, C h tet .: I fllt PZ6 r . fle �k w , - 1 a q fla tt '1 4 a ,- r 0 I :v F4-,, * , I t n it Skli> ,, ..t, , .*., . t 111:' , f f o 0 U Q 0 1 - E `� N 3 It 0. it o N N t. 61 T a F- D1 w f. " It _,, i1..tt . � . d1 o UCe` „ i € r _..- , m NI t h^- 2"--7,:-.., --- -,, 4 Aw,y 1 811 xc w t M SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 ,t A3PAGE 16 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Existing and/or forecasted traffic operations were evaluated for the intersections and driveways on 66th Street and York Avenue.The analysis was conducted for the following scenarios. 1. Existing 2016 Conditions 2. Projected 2018 No Build 3. Projected 2018 Build 4. Projected 2040 Build This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of traffic operations for each scenario. A. Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM).The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from"A"to "F"to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM.The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes,intersection lane configuration,and the traffic controls at the intersection.LOS A is the best traffic operating condition,and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level.LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity,and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals.LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection,and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection.At a stop sign-controlled intersection,LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all-way stop,or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through-street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un-signalized intersections are shown in Figure 7.The threshold LOS values for un-signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections.This variance was instituted because drivers' expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control.A given LOS can be altered by increasing(or decreasing)the number of lanes,changing traffic control arrangements,adjusting the timing at signalized intersections,or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 17 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 A(Lk Figure 7-Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un-signalized Intersections a m N 80 u ° ud U LOS E N y 55 _: . v m y E 50 °c LO_.SD > U d LOS E o a c 35 m 35 o a LOSC 2 25 20 o LOS C LOS B 15 10 10 LOS B LOSA LOSA Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection SOURCE:Level of Service thresholds from the Highway Capacity Manual,2000. LOS,as described above, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs.For example,improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all-way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection,could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road.Also,geometric improvements on minor legs,such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow,the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS. LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances, or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: • Synchro, a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies,was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning-movement volumes,lane geometrics, and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic,the traffic simulation model. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 S- PAGE 18 • SimTraffic is a micro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes, intersection configuration,and signal operations. The model simulates drivers'behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. B. Existing Level of Service Summary Table 3,below,summarizes the existing LOS at the primary intersections in the study area based on the current lane geometry,traffic control and 2016 traffic volumes.The table shows that all intersection and driveways are operating at an overall LOS C or better during both the PM peak hour. However,there are some left turn movements at LOS E including: eastbound 66th Street at France Avenue,westbound 66th Street at York Avenue and southbound York Avenue at the Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access. Table 3 -Existing (2016)Level of Service Summary Intersection LOSPM Peak Hour (sec/veh) 66th St at France Ave C (E) 25 66th St at Drew Ave/Southdale Entrance B (C) 14 • 66th St at Southdale Exit B (B) 10 66th St at Barrie Rd/Firestone RI Access. A (A) 2 66th St at Firestone RI/RO Access A (A) 1 66th St at York Ave C (E) 34 York Ave at Southdale Entrance A (B) Delay 4 York Ave at Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access C (E) 28 C = Overall LOS, (D) =Worst movement LOS Source:WSB &Associates, Inc. C. Forecasted Traffic Operations A capacity and LOS analysis was completed for the study area intersections for 2018 which is the year after the proposed site would be fully developed and for the 2040 conditions which represents the City's Comprehensive Plan development time frame. The results of the analysis are discussed below and shown in Tables 4 and 5. Table 4 -Forecasted No Build, shows that all intersection will continue to operate at overall LOS C or better in 2018 during the PM peak hour with overall delays increasing slightly. However,similar to the existing conditions some movements will be operating at LOS E including: eastbound 66th Street at France Avenue,southbound France Avenue at 66th Street, eastbound and westbound 66th Street at York Avenue and southbound York Avenue at the Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access. 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA ^ V PAGE 196 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 J� Table 4 -Forecasted 2018 No Build-Level of Service Summary 2018 PM Peak Hour Intersection LOS Delay (sec/veh) 66th St at France Ave C(E) 26 66th Stat Drew Ave/Southdale Entrance B (C) 15 66th St at Southdale Exit B (B) 11 66th St at Barrie Rd/Firestone RI Access. A (A) 2 66th St at Firestone RI/RO Access A(A) 1 66th St at York Ave C (E) 36 York Ave at Southdale Entrance A(B) 5 York Ave at Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access C (E) 30 C = Overall LOS, (D) =Worst movement LOS Source: WSB&Associates, Inc. Table S-Forecasted Build,shows that,assuming the proposed development, all intersection would continue to operate at overall LOS C or better in 2018 and at an • overall LOS D or better in 2040 during PM peak hour. Overall LOS and delays do not show any other significant changes from the no-build condition.As indicated with the existing conditions and no-build conditions some left turn movements will continue to operating at LOS E in both 2018 and 2040 including: eastbound 66th Street at France Avenue,southbound France Avenue at 66th Street, eastbound and westbound 66th Street at York Avenue and southbound York Avenue at the Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access. Table S-Forecasted Build-Level of Service Summary 2018 PM Peak Hr 2040 PM Peak Hr Intersection LOS Delay LOS Delay (sec/veh) (sec/veh) 66th St at France Ave C (E) 28 D (E) 44 66th St at Drew Ave/Southdale Entrance B (C) 15 B (C) 16 1 66th Stat Southdale Exit B (B) 11 B (B) 13 66th St at Barrie Rd/Firestone RI Access. A (A) 2 A(B) 3 66th St at Firestone RI/RO Access A (A) 2 A(B) 6 66th St at York Ave D (E) 36 D (E) 46 York Ave at Southdale Entrance A (B) 5 A(C) 7 York Ave at Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access C (E) 32 D(E) 40 C= Overall LOS, (D) =Worst movement LOS Source:WSB &Associates, Inc. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2 016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 M/ (_� PAGE 20 9 MULTI MODAL REVIEW/ANALYSIS A. Pedestrian/Bike System Chapter 7 of the City's current 2008 Comprehensive Plan addresses locations of proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities and funding options within the City. The current Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities are shown in Figures 8 and 9.The City of Edina is committed to providing a comprehensive and coordinated pedestrian network that provides transportation as well as recreational value. Currently adjacent to the Southdale Center several sidewalks are provided. Existing or future sidewalks are identified on both sides of all the roadways surrounding Southdale Center. In addition the following bicycle routes are identified adjacent to Southdale Center: Primary Routes: • 69th Street from Xerxes to France Avenue • North/south route connecting the Promenade at 70th Street through the Galleria across 69th Street,through Southdale Center to 66th Street, with a connection to the Southdale Transit Center • 66th Street from north/south route through Southdale Center to Valley View Road Secondary Routes: • France Avenue from Bloomington City limit to 62nd Street, adjacent to Southdale Center • York Avenue from Bloomington City limit to Minneapolis City limit adjacent to Southdale Center • 66th Street from north/south Primary route east to Richfield City limit Currently within the Southdale Center a network of sidewalks with marked crosswalks provides access from the center through the parking lots to the supporting local sidewalk and bicycle facilities. The proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development is proposing a sidewalk system around the site as shown in Figure 2 on page 6.These sidewalks will connect to the in place Southdale Center sidewalk system and the City's local sidewalk and bicycle system facilities.This will provide multi-modal opportunities and options for hotel employees and guests. 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 % PAGE 21 B. Transit System In 2014 Metro Transit opened the Southdale Transit Center and Park&Ride facility. The Transit Center is located southwest of the York Avenue and 66th Street intersection, on the east side of Southdale Center near the entrance to JC Penney. The site includes 70 surface Park&Ride parking spaces,with overflow parking for additional vehicles east of the Southdale Center ring road. Transit service is provided to the center from 8 primary routes including: • Route 6-to Minneapolis (urban local) • Route 515 -to Bloomington, 66th Street Richfield, METRO Blue Line(VA Medical Center,Mall of America) • Route 537-to Bloomington,Normandale College • Route 538 -to south Bloomington, METRO Blue Line (Mall of America) • Route 578 -to Minneapolis (express) • Route 579 -to U of M (express) • Route 684-to Minneapolis, Eden Praire, Chanhassen and Chaska (SouthWest Transit) • Route 694-to Eden Praire, Chaska, Normandale College, Richfield (SouthWest Transit) The proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development is planned for the area across the Southdale Center ring road adjacent to the Southdale Center Transit Center. The hotel development is proposing a sidewalk system that provides direct access to the Transit Center.This will provide the employees and guests at the hotel the opportunity to utilize transit services as a mutli-modal option. - SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 PAGE 22 • Figure 8 -Edina Sidewalk Facilities I • i + L is 1 - -41 i i . 1 i .. — ?� -; is , _ . . �r � � .... \ - .. ,+l • 1 a. �' 1. it .,. ' i��+ 1 — t AkV+Li* ♦��...a�..- I f + I fj 5 - 1• 1. L 1 • �} 1 14 r 1 .., , ! 1 1 I (( r „, i qtr t I art • ( _._ f i ' Creek To Legend Existing Future Future future Future Gre Skiewatk State-Aid Sidewalk Active Routes City Sidewalk Noe WeCre To School Sidewalk t Trail 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 0 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 Al PAGE 23 Figure 9-Edina Bicycle Facilities , rf , 4 , I I e i ,1 4 0 1 II ,,;- , .., , . , * - : . * * ... . * 62 , . * a _ a a , . 6,a a - ......,....- lb .4... Bicycle Facilities fiA,,Ruults ibly,,......,- i ur it..p....d 4.'3 Figure 9 «........Arly=teof eik**Lpi,lou """"840 to Shtf el thtt I .111 at l• &kr.Boulevardi "Grf-er Stlate.e•B•kt• Int . e , j) 81k**Ortts Ax.q.,,,,40., smart()Lar*.f.titri*Itius „.„, *11 synod 81*“.liouto.* Approv*(IP*qqity Roolo Appnied c,r91ity R*.*Jtl. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 AI( PAGE 24 PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS The parking impacts associated with the addition of the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development on the existing Southdale Shopping Center site was analyzed. The analysis is based on the proposed changes in uses on the Southdale Center site including removing the existing parking atithproposed the proposed hotel developmentdevelopment and adding the proposed parking associated w In 2012 with the development of the Southdale Residential project"One Southdale Residences" a Parking Study was completed assuming, additional mall area, a proposed restaurant outlot and,the proposed Southdale Residential project. Based on the analysis 6442 total parking spaces would be provided.This included 6100 spaces on the Southdale Center site and 342 spaces associated with the Southdale Residential project.Based on City Code the site needed 6747total spaces requiring a variance for 305 spaces,which was granted with the Southdale Residential project approval. The approved parking conditions from the 2012 Parking Study was assumed as the base for the analysis of the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development project. Table 6 below shows a summary of the approved conditions from the 2012 Parking Study, parking required based on City Code e with the opo generationhteld velopment and,the on estimated parking needs basedP Par Table 6 -Site Parking Summary • Approved 2012 Parking Study Parking Parking Anticipated Parking Approved from City Demand Use Development from City Parking Code from ITE Size Code 1,194,731 sf 5974 5974 5529f11 Southdale Retail 166 NA 1657 seats 166 6100 Southdale Restaurants 345 345 NA Southdale Theater 3447 seats 30 30 105 Restaurant Outlot 300 seats 318 Apartment 232 units 232 342 232 Develo.ment NA NA 160 175 Hotel Develo.ment NA Total Parkin: S.aces 6747 6442 6907 6127 Total Parking Spaces 6442 6297(2) 6297 Provided Not 305 305 610 Re•uired Parkin!Variance (1)—Includes mall restaurants and theater area but not the future restaurant outlot(1,328,850 sf) (2)-Existing parking 6442—stalls removed for hotel 266+new stalls with hotel 121=6297 04/06/2016 SOUTHDALEI HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA [� 1 a, PAGE 25 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 �T As indicated in Table 6,the parking provided on the Southdale Center site based on the approved Parking Study is 6442 spaces with a parking variance for 305 spaces.With the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development a total of 266 existing spaces will be removed and 121 spaces will be added on the site. This leaves a total of 6297 spaces, which would require a parking variance for 610 spaces.Although this is an increase in the required parking variance it is still less than the original parking variance approved in 2000 of 759 spaces. In addition the anticipated parking demand for the site was determined.The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual,4th Edition. Table 6 also shows the results of the parking demand analysis. It should be noted that the parking generation rates used for the Southdale Center was based on a shopping center use which includes the restaurant and theater uses within the mall. The rates used were based on: • Shopping center-Peak weekend (Friday or Saturday) in December • Restaurant outlot-Peak weekend (Friday or Saturday)in December • Apartment Development- 100%occupied • Hotel Development- 100% occupied These rates represent a worst case condition for parking demand. Based on this analysis, 6127 parking spaces would be needed on the Southdale Center site,which would not require a parking variance. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES CITY OF EDINA 04/06/2016 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 All 3 PAGE 26 CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis documented in this study,WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development includes the addition of a 4 story, 146 room suites hotel. The development is anticipated to generate an additional 80 trips in the PM peak hour. • Additional trips will be generated from adjacent new approved development including vacant and renovated Southdale Center mall space and a proposed new Restaurant outlot.These uses will generate an additional 1211 trips in the PM peak hour. • Existing traffic operations at the intersections and driveways on York Avenue and 66th Street are operating at overall LOS C or better during the PM peak hour with the specific left turn movements of eastbound 66th Street at France Avenue,westbound 66th Street at York Avenue and southbound York Avenue at the Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access at LOS E. ▪ Intersection traffic operations for the no-build in 2018 and build conditions in 2018 and 2040 will continue to operate at an overall LOS C or better in 2018 and D or better in 2040 during the PM peak hour.Similar to the existing conditions the • specific left turn movements of eastbound 66th Street at France Avenue,southbound France Avenue at 66th Street,eastbound and westbound 66th Street at York Avenue and southbound York Avenue at the Southdale Exit/Cub Food Access. • The proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development is proposing a sidewalk system on their site that provides direct access to the existing Southdale Center and City sidewalk and bicycle facilities as well as the Southdale Transit Center located adjacent to the proposed site.This will provide the employees and guests at the hotel the opportunity to utilize these mutli-modal options. • The existing or proposed available parking does not or will not meet the City's Code. A 305 parking space variance is currently in place for the existing Southdale Center site based current and proposed changes to the Southdale Center site identified in 2012. With the addition of the Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development a total of 266 existing spaces will be removed and 121 spaces will be added on the site.This leaves a total of 6297 spaces,based on the assuming 6442 spaced from the approved Parking Study in 2012.This would require a parking variance for 610 spaces. • Based on ITE parking generation estimates the total parking required for the Southdale Center site including the proposed hotel development is 6127 spaces. With this estimate,no parking variance would be required. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA n PAGE 27 WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 �'- Based on these conclusions the following recommendations should be considered: 1. Complete the proposed Southdale Center ring road improvements of converting the a section from one-way to two-way as identified on site plan. 2. Complete the proposed sidewalk plan connecting the hotel to the internal Southdale Center facilities and adjacent City facilities,as identified on site plan. 3. Provide a 610 parking space variance for the Southdale Center site. No additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel development. SOUTHDALE HOMEWOOD SUITES 04/06/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-71 A7 PAGE 28 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 21,2000 Conference and Section Championship. Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Kelly introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION NO.2000-118 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 2000 BOYS'SOCCER TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 2000 Boys' Soccer • + were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference,Section Champions and State Ch. 1 • ins;and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team • ause of their extraordinary ability,hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches d WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the . tubers of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good - ,ortsmanship. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Ci• ouncil that congr. 'ons be extended to the members of the Team: Sam Awsumb Andy Witchger Benjamin .1 ton Jonathan Lewis Patrick Cronan Nicola• .•orns Erik Nichols Alexander Darb Pet• . irgensen Terence O'Connell Robert Gueli Lund Daniel Roddy Philip Jo •n • thony Ruben Jeffrey Shideiman i'erek L I quist Aaron Witchger Jeffrey Strickland Eric S• i ver David Jenson,Coach Tommy Weber C • : York Bill Garner,Asst. Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED a at this resoluti. be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies e given to memb• : of the Team. • ADOPTED this 210 day o• ovember,2000. Ayes:Hovland,Kelly,Maetz• Resolution adopted. . *MINUTES OF THE c GULAR MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 6 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Member H. land and seconded by Member Kelly approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 6,2000,approved. Motion carried on rollcall vote-three ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CONCORDIA PROPERTIES, L.L.C. APPROVED, SSOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the owners of Southdale have submitted a request for Final Development Plan approval to allow the construction of an addition to the center containing a floor area of 120,007 square feet. The addition would house a 16-screen theater and two new restaurants. The theater would have a seating capacity of 3,959. The proposed addition would increase the total floor area of the center from 1,248,517 to 1,368,524 square feet The additions would be located adjacent to the southwest corner of the center in an area now used for parking and for transit operations. The additions would result in a reduction of the total on-site parking from the current 7,104 spaces to 6,686 spaces. .,` `.. 7 Page d Ne 3 G ( 1 fr i 1 Minutes cline City Councilovember 21 2000 Scott Pollack, Aerostreet, project architect, gave a presentation using graphics of the proposed expansion. Mr. Pollack noted the expansion is proposed for the southwest corner of the site with li the theater being placed between the existing truck tunnel and the existing parking deck. The i ring road will be moved further out to maximize the parking inside of the ring road that would be more comfortable to the customers. Mr. Pollack explained there are two parking fields' one east and one west of the expansion,both at different levels. From the lower parking field, there will be two entrances, the lobby entrance into the movie theater. He added patrons would be able to purchase tickets inside the theater. Next to this would be a separate entrance replacing the existing mall entrance. This entrance would allow customers to pass through the theater and into the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that the two restaurants with outside entries would have their own identities on the outside of the mall. Mr. Pollack explained that there is an underutilized common area of approximately 20,000 feet that will be converted into tenant space with the improvement. He said that there is a synergy existing between theaters arid restaurants so placing them in close proximity is important On the restaurant side of the addition, there would be entrances into the restaurants, individual retail tenants,and two mall entrances one with an escalator down to the theater. Mayor Maetzold asked how people get from the main core of the shopping center to the bus terminal. Mr. Pollack said from the lower level, people would walk through an arcade and out through the movie theater. From the upper level,they would walk along the length of the theater to the bus shelter. • Member Hovland asked if it was correct that in order to reach the bus shelter persons would walk outside, and if this would be different from the present situation, where they walk out directly from the mall to a covered bus shelter. Mr. Pollack acknowledged that there is a longer distance than exists today. Member Hovland asked if there was any plan to allow access to the bus shelter through the back area of the theater or on the west side. Mr. Pollack explained that was actually the truck tunnel and would be unsafe. Member Hovland asked how far a person would have to walk to reach the shelter. Mr.Pollack replied approximately 250 feet. Member Kelly asked to address the developer. Richard Taylor, the O'Connor Group, one of the general partners who own the property said he serves as the asset manager responsible for Southdale. Member Kelly said it appears the proposal is almost as if an outlet was proposed for development While he would be willing to give up the 700 parking spaces, he needs to be convinced that it will increase traffic flow in the center and allow areas of Southdale that have been under-performing(Mervyns to Penneys and Penneys to Daytons) to grow their traffic. He warned that he could not support any further reductions in parking in the future after this addition. He asked how the proposed addition would increase the traffic to the Mervyns' arid Pennies' corridors. Mr. Taylor responded that looking at sales per square foot, Southdale is in the top ten of the national regional malls. Penney's Court has 59,000 square feet that is about 50% occupied under permanent leases. Merryns' Court on the lower level has about 30,000 square feet, which is about 40% occupied.As the owner analyzed the issues of the property, they looked at these two underutilized areas plus the third level food court, which had not performed as hoped. The owners attempted to find a theater operator who would put a two or three level theater into the Penneys' Court and were unsuccessful. Theater owners said their operations need to be a single level entity and the proposed location is the only one available. He added Page 5 477 Minutes/Edina City Cotmcil/November 21,2000 Public Comment David Farrier, 4612 Casco Avenue, asked if there had been any consideration of moving the mass transit location to an entirely different area from either its existing or proposed locations. Council Discussion/Action Member Kelly said he has spoken with many of the development team. He stated that his major concern is that the expansion is being sought to increase the mall's market value allowing Southdale to be flipped without looking to the long-term needs of the area. Member Kelly said he originally thought the expansion.,would be located nearer to J. C. Penney's and that the restaurants would be decentralized. He added that in his opinion, the development of virtually an outlot does nothing to improve traffic.Member Kelly stated further that the expansion solves a secondary problem at the cost of 700 parking spaces. He stated that future development cannot come at the cost of more parking. Member Kelly asked this be made a condition of approval for the current proposal. Member Hovland said he did not share all the concerns of Member Kelly. He acknowledged that having a theater anchoring a mall was a new concept, adding that he understood the synergy existing between theaters and restaurants. Member Hovland recognized the hard work of the development team, thanking them for the presentation. Member Hovland said he was all right with the reduction in the parking, but was very concerned about affecting mass transit He requested that the development approval be conditioned upon further design and approval of the transit hub and access to the bus shelter. Mass transit and bus ridership should be encouraged. Mayor Maetzold noted that he wished the changes were completed on France Avenue.However, he stated he liked the theater concept. Mayor Maetzold voiced concern about the east side of the property. He added he thought the developers had done a good job with traffic flow and parking,however,he shares Member Hovland's concern for the transit hub and does not want to see any negative impact on bus ridership. Mayor Maetzold does not want to see bus riders walking 280 feet outside to get to a bus shelter agreeing that a condition of approval should be further review of the mass transit portion of the project. Member Kelly questioned how many liquor licenses are still available in Edina. Mr. Hughes replied that eleven licenses are still available, Member Kelly expressed concern that the restaurants developed be of a caliber that would improve the mall. Gary Colliard responded that while his firm is the theater developer, it is also a mixed-use Iand developer. They will be in the center for twenty years and have a fiduciary responsibility to make sure any restaurants are a good fit and that everyone's goal was to improve the traffic and viability of the Southdale Center. Member Hovland made a motion to close the public.hearing. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland,Kelly,Maetzold Motion carried Member Kelly made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2000-123 granting final development plan approval conditioned upon: 1) location and design of transit hub must be approved by City Staff;2) an easement allowing City transit vehicles the right to cross Center property;3) a Page 7 A7' Jackie Hoogenakker From: Joel Stegner <joel.r.stegner@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 3:31 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Homewood Suites at Southdale Center project Planning Committee members and staff, I am writing with a specific concern about the Homewood Suites project, that I would hope would be addressed through fine-tuning the design, because it is a major flaw to an otherwise very desirable project. With this project, the city will have built out the three corners of 66th and Xerxes/York that are within city boundaries. The combined impact of these three projects will increase traffic congestion at this intersection, which is already impacted by speeding and running red lights as well as drivers not signaling turns or being particularly careful when pedestrians are present. My issue is with driveways, sidewalks, and crosswalks. Currently going south,on York traffic turns into Southdale. There is a sidewalks, but drivers often don't signal their turns, reduce their speeds or watch for pedestrians. The sidewalks are very close to traffic, narrow and at driveways, walkers need to dodge traffic. The road is extremely dangerous for cyclists, which one rarely sees. None of the cross walks on the intersection are clearly marked, and where there is a turn lane, there are no markings at all. None of the street crossing have timed lights, which clearly communicate to drivers how much time they have to safely cross the intersection. The medians between traffic lane are very narrow, with people caught between having traffic whizzing by. For walkers and bikers, it would difficult to intentionally make the sidewalks and crossings at the intersection more dangerous than they are currently, not to mention how things will deteriorate with the new building based on current drawing.. Visually, the hotel wil make the corner much busier and more visually distracting. The sketch plans essentially show the sidewalks as unchanged - not wider or more set back from the site. This alternative is in no way consistent with the Planning Principles developed by the Greater Southdale working group. In fact, parts of thee building are built right up to the sidewalk, which potentially creates a new blind spots for drivers. When the development on the north side of the street was initially proposed, city staff saw no need to make any traffic changes. There was nothing done to to address the already dangerous conditions for walkers and bikers at that intersection as well as along • 66th and York/Xerxes. I would hope that with approval of this project, that actual conditions for walkers and bikers are greatly improved. For a person crossing 66th coming up to the hotel, how will they be able to walk into the Southdale Center more safely? Why is this important? More walkers means more business for the businesses in Southdale and along York and less traffic congestion. It was suggested to our work group that a more pedestrian friendly environment would be created with these building additions, but the drawings convey absolutely nothing to suggest that might be true. When you mail out this kind of announcement, it would be very helpful for people to be able to go to the Edina website and get more details about the project. If those were provided, it could alleviate some of my concerns or intensify them. Given that past projects haven't been developed with much consideration of making walking in the Southdale more safe and common, why would anyone have any faith in vague promises that might be made, but forgotten when the project is improved. Pedestrian improvements should be a clear part of every project built in the Southdale area, until the major barriers to walking have been removed. While I'm happy to put in the time to analyze drawing, write letters and serve on the work group, as I want to improve my community, most people need encouragement and help to do so. Communications around these projects need to be assessed and improved. It is very hard for many to attend public meetings, particularly those who are new to the community (don't know how things work here), have mobility restrictions (how do this ® project work for people in wheelchairs), have children at home or are intimidated by speaking out. Your meetings are on Wednesday night, when during nine months of the year I have church choir rehearsal. Wednesday is church night for individuals and many families. People should not have to show up at a meeting, make a phone call or write a letter to be heard, when there are other options. Public hearings are not the best or only way to gather information in the age of the internet. Virtually all of your materials can be put on line, for people to review at their convenience. People can be asked a series of structured questions (using online survey technology) to make it possible to gather much more extensive and useful public feedback/ One could almost conclude that the city doesn't just consider review public input as any more than a required step for which the quality of the feedback is not relevant. Just a hurdle to clear with without delaying the project or fundamentally changing it. I'm asking the city think of this project from the viewpoint of the pedestrian an make needed changes to increase the number of walkers and improve their experience enough so they are comfortable leaving their car at home I can support this project under a number of conditions. First, the hotel's setback from the intersection need to be increased enough, so the sidewalk can be widened and moved back from the street. Second, people wanting to walking to Southdale from that corner need to have a clear path to follow, with marked crosswalks wherever crossing internal center roads is needed. Third, all of the crossing lights on the intersection are 2 converted to timed. Fourth, all the crosswalks are widened, converted to the most obvious striping and repainted whenever they start to fade. Fourth, traffic law enforcement on 66th and York are tightened, with those who speed, run lights, make turns without signalling and who do not give pedestrians right of way in crosswalks being more consistently ticketed. The greater presence of police in the area will slow traffic speeds. Finally, adding amenities such as benches and plantings will make the area feel less like a speedway that encourages reckless driving. I don't believe that these requests are excessive or terribly expensive, if the city is really serious about making the Southdale area much more friendly to pedestrians. Why do planning at all if it doesn't correct long-standing problems or avoids creating new ones? Sincerely, Joel Joel Stegner 6312 Barrie Road 1C Edina, MN 55435 952-843-3440 3 Draft MinutesEl Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Minutes 4110• 1.-% City Of Edina, Minnesota @Planning Commission H� ®� Edina City Hall Council Chambers • 4801 West 50th Street �f�Uftlt�f����� Wednesday, March 23, 2016 I. Call To Order Chair Platteter called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were Chair Platteter, Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Kivimaki, Nemerov, Olsen, Hamilton. Absent from the roll were Carr and Ma Ill. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Thorsen to approve the March 24, 2016, meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Olsen. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes The minutes from the February 24, 2016, meeting were held over to address changes. V. Special Recognitions And Presentations Annual Meeting of the Planning Commission— Election of Officers and Bylaws. Chair Platteter welcomed Commissioners and explained at this time they would be electing officers for the upcoming year. Chair Platteter opened the meeting for nominations. Motion was made by Commissioner Lee to nominate Commissioner Olsen to the office of Secretary of the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded by Thorsen. Commissioner Olsen accepted the nomination. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion was made by Chair Platteter to nominate Commissioner Carr to the office of Vice- Chair of the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded by Nemerov. All voted aye. The motion carried. — 1 — • Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Motion was made by Commissioner Nemerov to nominate Michael Platteter to the office of Chair of the Planning Commission. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Platteter accepted the nomination. All voted aye. The motion carried. Chair Platteter introduced the Planning Commission bylaws for approval. Commissioner Lee commented that she would like to discuss elements of the bylaws. It was decided to hold this discussion at a later date. Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the 2016 Planning Commission By- laws. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Public Hearings A, Sign Variance. Aurora on France. 6500 France Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Repya reported that the applicant,Aurora on France, is requesting a variance to allow an additional monument sign to be erected abutting the 656 Street West elevation. Repya noted that the criteria for signage for the site must adhere to the Regional Medical District sign requirements, which allows one wall sign and one monument sign per street frontage. Repya explained that the variance was necessitated due to the additional or second 26 square foot monument sign providing way-finding for the "Visitor Parking & Deliveries. Planner Repya concluded that staff recommends approval of the sign variance to allow an additional monument sign abutting 65`h Street West to provide for way-finding based on the following findings: I. The request is reasonable in terms of providing tenants and guests of Aurora on France clear directional signage to find their destination. With two entrance drives off of 65`h, and 65th being a very busy road, providing motorists with clear signage to find their destination will help the safety on the road. 2. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the site on a busy roadway, the two access points to the site, and the site's location in a busy medical area. 3. The combined sign area on the north elevation for the two monument signs and one wall sign will be 88 square feet; well below the allowed 120 square feet for a wall and monument sign. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: I. Site Plan date stamped February 18, 2016. 2. Sign plans and elevations date stamped February 18, 2016. 410 - 2 - Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. • Appy ins for the Applicant Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Motion made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion A brief discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the additional monument sign was a helpful addition to clarify way-finding. Motion Motion made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the variance to allow an additional monument sign subject to staff findings and conditions. Motion seconded by Commissioner Lee. All voted aye. The motion carried. 8-0 VI. Community Comment An Edina Student explained to the Commission that she, along with fellow classmates, was present this evening to "take notes" at a public meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 66 West TIF District. 3330 66th Street West Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Staff Presentation Bill Neuendorf addressed the Commission and explained the proposed 66 West2 TIF District is limited to this single parcel that is anticipated to be redeveloped in the near future for 39-units of affordable housing targeted to teenagers and young adults that were previously homeless. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority has recommended that the City of Edina consider a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District to advance community goals in the Greater Southdale Area. Neuendorf explained that the 66 WEST2 TIF is currently located within the Southdale 2 TIF District and it is proposed to be removed from the Southdale 2 TIF District and be established as the 66 West TIF District. A parcel of land cannot be located within two TIF Districts. Neuendorf concluded that at this time the Commission is being asked to confirm that the proposed TIF • Plan is in compliance with Edina's Comprehensive Plan, Land Use, Density and Floor to Area Ratio. - 3 -- Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Discussion Commissioners briefly discussed the request and indicated their support for establishing a TIF District for this individual site. Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to recommend approval of the 66 West TIF District; noting it's consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Hobbs. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Sketch Plan Review— DJR Architecture, Inc. 3901 70th Street West Planner Comments Planner Teague reported the Commission is being asked to review a sketch plan proposal at 3901 70th Street West. Teague said the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing gas station and re-build an 8,030 square foot retail building. Continuing, Teague said the applicant would like to request a rezoning of this site from Planned Commercial District-4 (PCD-4) to Planned Unit Development. Teague noted the proposed building is very similar to the request made by this same applicant across the street at the Phoenix Plaza, where the Vitamin Shoppe and Ameritrade building is located. Concluding, Teague said the proposal would be an improvement over the existing building and the use on the site. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis and Sheldon Burg, DJR, Architecture, Inc. Applicant Presentation Dean Dovolis addressed the Commission and explained it was their intent to redevelop this site with a "sister-building" to the building across the street (Phoenix Place). Dovolis said the exterior building materials would match; however, the design of the new building would be different. With graphics Dovolis highlighted aspects of the project. e Rezone the subject site from PCD-4 Planned Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Phoenix Place across the street was similarly rezoned. o Redevelopment would create a greener and more environmentally friendly building site by improving storm water rates. o Improved traffic circulation. ® Create a more pedestrian friendly environment by supporting the initiatives from the Comprehensive Plan and Southdale/France Avenue working principles. ® Adds additional retail elements that would serve the adjoining residential neighborhood. Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. • Chair Platteter thanked the development team for their presentation and explained to the audience that sketch plan review is not a public hearing. The applicant presents their sketch plan to gather input from the Commission. Comments/Suggestions from the Commission • Consider extending the boulevard style sidewalk along France Avenue. It appears the southernmost extension has the sidewalk adjacent to the street with the and street asindicated lto tlngs he northeen the sidewalk and parking stalls, not sidewalk, boulevard o Reconsider building placement. Is it possible to pull the building father back from France Avenue to achieve a wider boulevard area? The development team indicated if that was considered parking spaces would be lost; and while they want beto achieve successful.apedestrian The developme friendly engaging site the building needs to be adequately pa team further noted that the landscaped area on the west is mostly on City right-of-way with residential properties directly to the west. • Some Commissioners indicated they did not like the concept of"sister" buildings on each corner. It was suggested that the applicant incorporate different exterior building materials. • It was mentioned that the "sister" buildings or "bookends" work well by anchoring the corners and creating a gateway into the adjoining residential neighborhood. • Continue to enhance the pedestrian experience and consider adding outdoor benches. • The development team was asked to remember the importance of providing convenient locations for bike parking. • The development team was asked if they had a tenant for the space; and if so what type of tenant is it. The development team indicated the tenant is a "dry goods" tenant. Mr. Dovolis in response to the discussion said their intent was thprovide rviiSbuilding da ethata experience. t creates a pedestrian friendly area that encourages walking and enhances greater Dovolis said he would look at shifting the building and eliminating parking stall(s); however, said he would be uncomfortable if more than two parking stalls were lost to accommodate landscaping, etc. Chair Platteter thanked the applicant for their presentation. C. Sketch Plan Review® Opus Development Company, LLC ® 5901 Lincoln Drive Planner Comments Planner Teague told the Commission they are being asked to review a sketch plan proposal to develop the former United Health Group site on Lincoln Drive. Teague reported that Children's Hospital is moving � 5 � Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. into portions of the existing office building, adding the request this evening is to remove a portion of the existing building and build a 4-story, 240-260 unit apartment building in its place. The applicant has indicated they would conform to the city's 10% affordable housing policy. Concluding Teague further reported that the applicant at the time of formal application will be seeking a rezoning from PID Planned Industrial District to MDD-5, Mixed Development District. Teague said the rezoning to MDD-5 matches City Code requirements. The proposed project also complies with the Comprehensive Plan. A�tsearin for the Applicant Matt Rauenhorst, Dean Newins, Phil Cattanach and Jay Fourniea from Opus. Applicant Presentation Mr. Cattanach addressed the Commission and said they are still in the development stages of the project, adding a traffic analysis, and final architectural plans for the proposed apartment building still need to occur. Cattanach explained it was very important to the development team to separate the uses of the Children's Hospital office use and the Lincoln Drive residential use. He pointed out they are proposing to provide a private entrance for each use. With graphics Cattanach further explained the project. Mr. Newins explained to the Commission the reason they will request a rezoning to MDD-5 was because it was felt that the MDD District would better tie into the existing uses in the area. He pointed out to the west lies a retail complex and highway and to the east and south residential properties. With graphics Newins further explained the topography, access points, layout, etc. Comments/Suggestions The Commission shared the following observations: ® The Commission noted that the applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to an MDD district, not PUD. They asked the development team if a PUD rezoning was considered. The development indicated that in their opinion the rezoning to MDD aligns best with the City's future guide plan and also supports the existing office use. ® The Commission asked the development team if they were comfortable with parking. The development team indicated they believe parking was adequately addressed for both the proposed apartment building and existing office use. The development team stressed how important it was for Children's to retain their parking. • It was further noted by the Commission that site lines into and exiting the property are not the best; however, they believe the rearrangement of the subject sites access points to align with the access point(s) across Lincoln Drive would work. Commissioners also asked the development team to work on ensuring that crosswalks from both the existing office building and proposed apartments to the small retail area are implemented and well defined. ® With regard to the access/exit and the driveway alignment to the retail complex (across the street) this may be a good place to introduce a roundabout. � 6 � Draft Minutes111 Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. • Commissioners noted that the site is large, and contains a lot of parking spaces; however, it is important to the City to maintain greenspace, adding if possible parking should be kept to the minimum. Mr. Nevins acknowledged there appears to be a lot of parking; however, he reiterated that it is important for Children's to retain all their parking. It is part of their lease. Commissioners suggested that the applicant work closely with representatives from Children's on the parking and the importance of greenspace. a Commissioners suggested creating sidewalks not only along the exterior of the site but in the interior of the site as well. It was pointed out that the proposed 3 River/9-Mile trail system will eventually tie into this area, adding that would be a benefit not only to the residents but to the employees of Children's. Chair Platteter thanked the applicant for their presentation and suggested that the applicant "take another look" at rezoning the subject site to a Planned Unit Development. VIII.Correspondence And Petitions Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported that materials drafted by the Greater Southdale Area Working Group would be posted on the City's website in the near future. Teague asked the Commission to watch for that posting. Teague told the Commission that at their last City Council meeting the Council approved preliminary rezoning and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the Millennium at Southdale. The Edina School District also received approval for their proposed subdivision on Metro Boulevard. Planner Teague reminded the Commission of the upcoming work session on residential development that will be held prior to the April 13th Planning Commission meeting (5:30 pm Mayor's Conference Room). Teague said the work session would include following a "building permit through the process". X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Thorsen to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission at 9:30 p.m. Motions seconded by Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. jadik jagenadiex Respectfully submitted — 7 — CITY OF EDINA MEMO City Hall . Phone 952-927-8861 �p e 's. h Fax 952-826-0389 •www.CityofEdina.com cm \• ../• Date: April 13, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment— Ordinance "Clean-up" regarding setbacks in the PUD- 7 District, existing ordinance section references and signage regulations rrors and or Over the past year, staff has ident��inancedseveral The summary belowos, formatting eexplains each theanges that are required in the Zoning O changes to the Ordinance that the Planning Commission is asked to recommend that the City Council revise. None of the proposed changes would be considered substantive. Section I. PUD-7 District (66 West). The City Code requires a 25-foot side yard setback requirement to the "Rear-South." This is a typo; the attached approved plan for this site shows a 23-foot setback on the ` Es to amend toSide- ast," The erlying the Code to Zoning eDistrict flect the would allow a 20-foot setback. The recommendation approved 23-foot setback to the Side-East setback. This building is anticipated to be constructed in late 2016. (See approved Site Plan on page Al.) Sections 2 & 3. Corrects incorrect Code citations. These Sections simply correct incorrect references to other parts of the Zoning Ordinance. Sections 4. Sign Installation. This Section increases the time allowed to construct a sign that has been issued a permit from three months to one year. This is consistent with other time frames for construction of permitted items, such as variances and site plans. Sections 5 & 6. LED Lighting. LED lighting is not referenced in current City Code. These sections simply add LED lighting along with like light sources such as Neon. Section 7. Correcting a formatting error in the sign regulations. Corrects an error in the table. Upon further research into the issue of area identification signs, staff has discovered that an error was made when the City re-codified the entire City of Edina Code Book. Dating back as far as 1970, area identification signs have been allowed in the R-I and R-2 zoning district not to exceed 24 square feet. (Attached are the Ordinances e from 1970 and the recent Ordinance 460.05 ages A2-A4.) When signs allowedhwereina City missed, an was re-codified, the spaces between eachof the different Area and Public Park Identification signs were put together by mistake with building identification signs churches, schools, golf courses, and public facilities. __, ------7.... .....NNIIMMIIIIIIMMINIMIllill"1111.1.11"111"1"."_ __ _ . City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SETBACKS IN THE PUD-7 DISTRICT, AND SIGNAGE REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-494 Planned Unit Development District-7 (PUD-7)—66Th West Apartments Building Setbacks Building Setbacks Front–66th Street Front–Barrie Road 43 feet 25 feet Side–North Side - East R ar--S&uth 50 feet 23 25 feet Building Height 2 stories Maximum Floor Area Ratio .77% (FAR) Building Coverage 30% Parking Stalls(affordable housing with services) 19 surface Proof-of-parking for 37 Parking stalls (Office uses Perthe Parkin per Section 36-575) requirements of Sec. 36- 1311 Section 2. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 8 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-617. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (a) Maximum floor area ratio. Subject to the requirements of 36-617. ;PCD 1 +1.0 of the tract ,—`-- -- 1PCD-2 11.5 of the tract – — PCD-3 1(-f) Northof West 70th Street: 1.0 of the tract, provided that nonresidential uses may not jexceed 0.75 1(2) South of West 70th Street: 0.5 of the tract PCD-4 X0.3 of the tract ----------------- Existing text–XXXX Stricken text–XXXX Added text–XXXX (b) Setbacks. Subject to the requirements of section 36-617(1) and (2). Front Yard (in feet) Side Yard (in feet) I Side Yard (in feet) Rear Yard (in feet) — PCD-1 35* 25* 25* 25* PCD-2 35* 25* 25* 25*PCD-3 ' North of I 35** 35** 35** 35** 70th St. South of 50** 50** 50** 50**PCD-4 70th St. 25 25 Gas stations 35 25 All other 45 25 45 25 {uses *Or the building height, if greater. **Subject to the requirements of section 36-617. 618. • Sec. 36-618. - Special requirements. In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: Section 3. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division9 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-643. - Requirements for building coverage, setbacks and height. (a) Minimum tract area. No tract of land shall be transferred to the Planned Industrial District unless the tract measures at least ten acres in area or is contiguous to other land in the Planned Industrial District. (b) Minimum lot area. The minimum lot area is two acres. (c) Minimum building area. Each building shall have a gross floor area of not less than 10,000 square feet. (d) Maximum building coverage. (1) Lots of less than three acres: 30 percent. (2) Lots of three acres or more: 45 percent. ymay withina singlebincreased building to apd60 rcent, if the all portions total gross floor area on the lot is contained of any loading docks and berths are completely enclosed within the same single building. 2 Existing text–XXXX Stricken text–XXXX Added text–XXXX (e) Maximum floor area ratio. Maximum: FAR: 0.5. The FAR may be increased to 0.6 for buildings which qualify for 60 percent building coverage, as provided in section 36-6-42441. 643(d). Section 4. Chapter 26, Article XIII, Division 2, Section 36-1545 is amended as follows: Except as provided in section 36-1547, the owner or occupant of the lot or tract on which a sign is to be displayed, or the owner or installer of such sign, shall file as application for a permit with the planner upon forms provided by the planner. Permits must be acquired for all existing, new, relocated, modified or redesigned signs except those specifically exempted below. The applicant shall submit with the application a complete description of the sign and a scaled drawing showing its size, placement, manner of construction, illumination, and such other information as deemed necessary by the planner. At the time of application, the applicant shall also submit a fee in the amount required by section 2-724. If a sign is erected without a permit the applicant shall submit an application for a permit and pay a fee that is two times the fee set out in section 2-724. If a sign has not been installed within three months one year after the date of issuance of said permit, the permit shall become null and void. Section 5. Chapter 36, Article XIII, Division 2, Section 36-1655 is amended as follows: Illuminated signs shall comply with the following requirements: (1) No sign shall change in either color or in intensity of light more frequently that once per hour, except signs giving time, date, temperature or weather information. (2) All incandescent bulbs or fluorescent tubes, except neon, LED or fiber optic light sources, shall be shielded with an opaque or translucent material. (3) No sign which is visible from a residential district, located within 200 feet of the sign, shall be illuminated between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.; provided, however, such signs may be illuminated at any time when the use identified by the sign is open for business. (4) The planner may specify additional restrictions regarding the hours of illumination as a condition to the issuance of a permit. Section 6. Chapter 36, Article XIII, Division 4, Section 37-1678 is amended as follows: The following signs are prohibited in all districts: (1) Non-accessory signs. (2) Indecent signs. Signs containing offensive or indecent symbols, pictures or written material. (3) Roof signs. (4) Motion signs. (5) Portable signs. (6) Signs, other than governmental signs, which are attached to utility poles, streetlights or trees. Existing text—XXXX Stricken text—XXXX 3 Added text—XXXX (7) Searchlights or beacons. (8) Vehicles with signs. It is the intent of this subsection to prohibit the use of a vehicle for the purpose of providing signage. In addition to the requirements imposed by this chapter and article XI of chapter 26, vehicles bearing signs exceeding two square feet in area must comply with the following restrictions: a. Such vehicles may not be parked within 50 feet of a public road right-of-way b. Such vehicles may not bear a sign constructed of paper, cloth, canvas, wood or other material not integral to the body of the vehicle. c. Such vehicles may not be parked in a location visible from public streets for periods longer than four hours during any 24-hour period. (9) Neon, LED or fiber optic light sources which are not within the permitted sign area. (10) Abandoned signs. (11) Billboard signs. Section 7. Chapter 36, Article XIII. Division 5, Section 36-1711 is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1711. —R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 Districts The following signs are permitted in the R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 districts: Maximum Type Maximum Number Maximum Area Height IA Nameplate or address One per dwelling unit 2 square feet 1 6 feet I — B. Building identification (churches,schools,golf courses,pubic facilities only) Wall building 24 square feet 1 N/A 1 per Freestanding 1 per frontage 36 square feet 8 feet --- -- One per 24 square feet 6 feet C. Area identification development — D. Public park identification One per frontage 24 square feet 6 feet E. Scoreboards: — 400 square feet(including 20 feet 1. Field No. 1 Courtney Field One sponsor panels) 2. 200 square feet(including 20 feet Van Valkenburg Park, Kuhlman Field and One per field sponsor panels) Braemar Park except Field No. 1 at Courtney Fields 3. O=All other public parks,schools and golf One per field 100 square feet 20 feet courses -- --- --- 4 Existing text—XXXX Stricken text—XXXX Added text—XXXX F. Public park scoreboard sponsor panels andr2 --___----_ other scoreboard advertising 125%of scoreboard area Section 8. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Existing text—XXXX Stricken text—XXXX 5 Added text—XXXX ' Qi, '11 . i-------1=-4 -. N ---y. ,CZ . •t> Q / 0 0 / . , _Ic • ‘•\1 •- 11%,•5•,. ---...s,- ._ \ 1 • ‘ / • ;.,':- ....,...........i.....- s ' „::,....... .- -ti:7 - ‘,._..:`\L...•- .'"•. ''I ' ''-----\ttteli,\ -....-- ' . /IV',- \• , .ilar , - -•''' IOW' , 1. • ....." -N' ,,\ .<• l c• ,(7 •. . '' Ein CV 0 .. \-•. 1 ... . _ . 1 i .C1.,,;7:.:216'•'''ti' "4' --•"", -.• ' --- -- -\ '----... ..:,,i,• 411r.'_4. 1 cii-,,_-_-_- ____. .1-- 7.-'"'.• - ---r--,c waling ,. N XI , AtlOIS Z NON kt '., . • , -— _7 7 77_7, rol ., onncrune AkIPIS Z ONLISIX3 . , '110 . - t-21,. - • •\.--.. Pi 1 .0.0 Ji c \ I 4 '' /WO ?Mt .• -- iii,.."... •% _ - ,J,11,,,t,3_ P.,,,, , • r,t0114,,,d 6,1 f•• •0 . i 1-6........1., .. ___---_•=f_-_,--6- *, ::}:4 011n•M 16.___.,,__, ___.-.... - 2 , m . j:-,,i----t_-_,, II -., o rm:>. 1 ______----..-------- ,...-. - S3•10 RI --____ -- _. ------ I I' - V,•111,1••313•010 ,,, 1 1 _____---- .13111,-A°0 6 4 - -,- ',..'1'‘7-3 .,;;P.„.1.„ ,46 0•......•,. ,.., N. NIS UNICINVJS 33iii 6 4•. ......`Cp i . Ns, •:>,......:s. 1,' : \ - 4:› 0 : %•• 0 ' -, '' ' ,41% ..-- 4 I 7. 4 --...„... ----....... i'\ ::;< ''--: ' "r•' • . . 1 \ 4L- //v,••:,•-•. ..:\ ._ - - . _ gc---v,_---------' ..- ttiVbaJia-ave' _ . • exempt from the provisions of this ordinance and shall not ( I) Identification Signs: One identification sign o require permits or payment of fees. symbol per building not greater than six square feet in area provided, such sign is attached flat against a wall of the building. Sec.4. Special Regulations, Temporary IVonaccessory-Free Standing Signs. Non-accessory signs shall be permitted on a (2) Area Identification Signs: One area identifi, 14 temporary basis on the following described property subject to ssign per development, providing such sign does not exceed ie all of the requirements herein set forth: "The West 120 feet of closerquare thanfeet in area,fand anyursher provided,such sign is placed lie Section 32, Township 28, Range 24 except the north 1320 ten feet to street right-of-way line. feet thereof." (3) Institutional Signs: One sign per street frontage (a) Maximum Height: 20 feet. identifying an institutional complex within a multiple resi (b) Maximum Sign Area: 300 square feet per facing and dential district (n°hallenotnt, nursing, rest or exceed 24 square feet an area noE not to exceed two facings.Double-faced signs shall be attached homes • Such aced closer than ten feet to any street right-of wa} back to back.• shall it be 1 line. (c) Minimum Distance Between Signs: 500 feet. (4) Accessory Use Signs: Signs identifying uses acces sory to a multiple residential development shall not be visible (d) Minimum Setback From Street Right-of-Way Lines: 25 from the outside of the building. feet. (e) Distance From Street Intersections: Not closer than (5) Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3. 500 feet to the intersection of two or more streets or (6) Maximum Height of Free-Standing Signs: Six feet. highways, such distance being measured from the intersection (7) Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3 (o). of street or highway centerlines. (f) Proximity to Uses Permitted in Residential Districts and New Construction: Not closer than 500 feet to any resi- (c) Automobile Parking District. dential structure,any publicly-owned land,or any other use or (I) Identification Signs: One identification sign per structure permitted in anyresidential district. When an street frontage depicting the name of the lot, rates, and type P structure is built in a residential district within 500 feet of a of operation.Such signs shall not exceed 24 square feet in area. temporary non-accessory sign, ssgtru ture. Furtherrmorall be l (2) Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3 (o). removed upon occupancy of suche, such temporary non-accessory sign parcel occupied by such sign is rezoned bel removed from its present R-1 (20) feet. Residential District classification and when either of the (3) Maximum Height of Free-Standing Sign: Tv following conditions exist: (d) Commercial Districts C-1, C-2, C-3, PC-1, PC-2 and (1) A building is built and occupied on the lot,tract or PC-3. parcel upon which the sign stands,or (1) Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to (2) A building is built and occupied on a lot, tract or a building wall shall not exceed 15% of the total area of that parcel abutting France Avenue which is immediately adjacent wall. to the lot,tract or parcel upon which the sign stands. (2) Free-Standing Signs: One free-standing sign for each perfrontage. area of a fding Sec. 5. District Regulations. In addition to those signs signdfor ga buildingthav ng one streethetal frontage sha lrnot exceed permitted in all districts, the following signs are permitted in 80 square feet in Commercial Districts C-1,C-2,PC-1 and PC-2, each specific district and shall be regulated as to size,location nor shall it exceed 100 square feet in Commercial Districts C-3 and character according to the requirements herein set forth: and PC-3. Where a building has two or more street frontages, only one free-standing sign of the above size shall be per- (a) R-1 and R-2 Residential Districts. mitted. Each permitted free-standing sign in excess of one shall be no r (1) Nameplate Signs: One sign for each dwelling unit, The m ximumin height of free standing signs shallarea than one-half the area oftbe 0sfee�n not greater than two square feet in area, indicating the name the C-I. C-2, PC-1 and PC-2 Districts and 25 feet in the C-3 and/or address of the occupant. and PC-3 Districts. (2) Institutional and Recreational Signs: One sign or (3) Area Identification Signs: One sign bulletin board per street frontage for a church, a public not to exceed 100 square feet in area. per development institutional use, or a recreational use in the R-1 District.Such sign or bulletin board shall not exceed 24 square feet in area (4) Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3. nor shall it be placed closer than ten feet to any street right-of-way line. (5) Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3 (o). (3) Area.Identification Signs: One sign per development in a 1 (6) Exceptions: Offices and medical and dental clinics commercial district shall comply not to exceed 24 square feet in area. P Y with Section 5 (f) (Regional Medical and Office Building Districts)below. (4) Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3. (e) Commercial District C-4. (5) Maximum Height of Free-standing Signs: Six feet. (1) Wall Signs: The total area of all wall signs affixed to a (b) Multiple Residential Districts R-3, R4 and R-5. building wall shall not exceed 20% of the total area of that aI1. ��� 7s City ®f Edina Buildings, Construction and Signs 460.05 F. Signs, other than Governmental Signs, which are attached to utility poles, street lights or trees. G. Searchlights or Beacons. H. Vehicles with Signs. It is the intent of this Subdivision to prohibit the use of a vehicle for the purpose of providing signage. In addition to the requirements imposed by Sections 850 and 1046 of this Code, vehicles bearing signs exceeding two square feet in area must comply with the following restrictions: 1. Such vehicles may not be parked within 50 feet of a public road right-of- way. 2. Such vehicles may not bear a sign constructed of paper, cloth, canvas, wood or other material not integral to the body of the vehicle. 3. Such vehicles may not be parked in a location visible from public streets for periods longer than four hours during any 24 hour period. I. Neon or fiberoptic light sources which are not within the permitted sign area. J. Abandoned Signs. 460.05 District Regulations. Subject to provisions of Subsections 460.03 and 460.04, the i following building identification signs and area identification signs are permitted in each specific zoning district: Subd. 1 R-1, R-2, and PRD-1 Districts: Tyke_ Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height Nameplate or Address One per dwelling 2 sq. ft. 6 ft. unit Building Identification (churches, schools, golf courses, pubic facilities only) Wall: 1 per building 24 sq. ft. N/A frontage per 1fronta e 36 sq. ft. 8 ft. Area One per 24 sq. ft. 6 ft. development Public Park Identification One per frontage 24 sq. ft 6 ft. SCOREBOARDS: 400 sq. ft. 20 ft. A. Field#1 (Courtney One (including sponsor Field panels) 460 - 11 Supplement 2011-01 X6/4 City of Edina Buildings, Construction and Signs 460.05 3. Such vehicles may not be parked in a location visible from public streets for periods longer than four hours during any 24 hour period. I. Neon or fiberoptic light sources which are not within the permitted sign area. J. Abandoned Signs. 460.05 District Regulations. Subject to provisions of Subsections 460.03 and 460.04, the following building identification signs and area identification signs are permitted in each specific zoning district: Subd. 03` R-1, R-2, and PRD-1 Districts: Type Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height Nameplate or Address One per dwelling 2 sq. ft. 6 ft. unit Building Identification (churches, schools, golf courses,pubic facilities only) Wall: 1 per building 24 sq. ft. N/A Freestanding: 1 per frontage 36 sq, ft. g Area One per 24 sq. ft. 6 ft. • development Public Park Identification One per frontage 24 sq. ft 6 ft. SCOREBOARDS: A. Field#1 (Courtney One 400 sq. ft. 20 ft. Field (including sponsor panels) B. Van Valkenburg Park, One per field 200 s T t. 20 ft. Kuhlman Field and (including sponsor Braemar Park except panels) Field#1 at Courtney Fields C. All other public parks, One per field 100 sq. ft. 20 ft. schools and golf courses Public park scoreboard 25% of sponsor panels and other scoreboard area scoreboard advertising Subd 2- All Residential Districts__Except R:_-1, R-2, PRD-1 and the Mixed -Development District. /t[ - 460- 11 Supplement 2012-01 1NA°� � 4t, EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION 0 0 ke REPORT & RECOMMENDATION 4 • cr) o CZ 4'y •%)Rpow.,,,9 • 1888 Originator Meeting Date Agenda#VII. A. Joyce Repya April 13, 2016 Senior Planner APPLICANT: City of Edina - Heritage Preservation Board LOCATION: Wooddale Bridge No. 90646, on Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek REQUEST: Add Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning Designation to the Wooddale Bridge No. 90646 RECOMMENDED ACTION: Recommend the City Council add the Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning designation to the Wooddale Bridge • BACKGROUND: In 2008 the Heritage Preservation Board added the Wooddale Bridge to the list of Edina properties eligible for Edina Heritage Landmark Designation. At that time, in findings of significance supporting a potential local designation, it was noted that the bridge, constructed in 1937 by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) was part of a federal relief project to replace an earlier timber stringer bridge at the same location. The bridge is significant for its association with the WPA federal-relief program, its aesthetics, and as a representative example of a multi plate arch bridge; and one of only seven structures crossing Minnehaha Creek within the Edina city limits. On February 12, 2016, the Minnesota Historical Society announced that the historic bridge was added to the National Register of Historic Places. This national designation is an honor, however does not provide for protection of the bridge - the National Park Service depends on the local jurisdiction to address preservation of its heritage resources. With the intent of providing local protection for the Wooddale Bridge, the following Nomination Study and Plan of Treatment identifies the significance of the historic bridge as well as the recommended plan of treatment to address its preservation. EHL Designation Request Wooddale Bridge April 13, 2016 EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK NOMINATION STUDY & PLAN OF TREATMENT WOODDALE BRIDGE OVER MINNEHAHA CREEK Prepared by Robert C. Vogel Preservation Planning Consultant INTRODUCTION This report documents the historic Wooddale Bridge for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. It identifies and locates the heritage resource, explains how it meets the heritage landmark eligibility criteria, and presents a plan of treatment for the property. In general, the city heritage preservation program has adopted the conventions and terminology of the National Register of Historic Places in its documentation of Edina Heritage Landmarks. Once a property is rezoned as a heritage landmark by the City Council, the plan of treatment contained in the nomination report becomes the official site preservation plan. The subject property is owned and maintained by the City of Edina. It has been assigned number 90646 in the national bridge inventory maintained by the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The historic bridge was determined eligible for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark by the Heritage Preservation Board in 2008. In 2015 the bridge was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register nomination documents were reviewed by the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, which concurred with the preparer's findings of historical significance and integrity. (The Edina Heritage Landmark and the National Register programs use the same eligibility criteria.) DESCRIPTION The Wooddale Bridge carries Wooddale Avenue (County Road 150) over Minnehaha Creek (mile 10.4), a short distance upstream from St. Stephen the Martyr Episcopal Church. It carries two lanes of vehicular traffic on a north-south alignment. The bridge is a single-span corrugated multi-plate arch structure. The bridge is 21.0 feet long, with a span length of 18.0 feet and an out-and-out width of 40.4 feet. The steel plate arch is supported by cast-in-place concrete spread footings and the headwalls, railings and wing walls are faced with locally quarried Platteville limestone rubble. A builder's plaque inscribed "WPA 1937" is located on the downstream parapet wall. The historic structure is in good condition and has had very little alteration since it was erected in 1937. A detailed narrative description of the historic structure is presented in Section 7 of the National Register registration form (Attachment #4). Copies of the original construction documents are on file in the city engineer's office. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE The Wooddale Bridge was built in 1937 under the auspices of the U.S. Works Progress Administration (I 937). It was designed by W. E. Duckett, the Hennepin County highway engineer. The multi-plate steel arch was fabricated by the Lyle Pipe & Culvert Co. The construction was financed in part with federal aid funds administered by the Minnesota State Highway Department. 2 EHL Designation Request Wooddale Bridge April 13, 2016 Evad fm the perecve of tlochtoric contexts, "IyinnehaCreek" "Federefget Construction," the Wooddale Bridgehe has been determined eligible for designation as an Edina Herita Landmark on the basis of itstihistorical and engineering values. The property derives its significance under Edina Heritage Landmark eligibility criterionisA from its association with Federal relief constructionaluroin Edina and the developmental of transportation infrastructureha along Minnehaha and Creek. I also qualifies under eligibility criterion C as an outstanding, well preserved specimen of multi al-plateReli masonrytearch bridge construction. The property retains historic integrity of the essential physical features required to convey its historical and engineering significance. A more detailed and fully annotated narrative dealing with the subject property's preservation values from the perspective of engineering and bridge construction history is presented in Section 8 of the National Register registration form (Attachment#4). The National Register nomination specifically references the statement of historic contexts, associated property types, and property type registration requirements delineated in the National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form titled, "Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota, 1933-1941," which was used by the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office as the basis for its evaluation of the Wooddale Bridge. The National Register nomination was prepared by The 106 Group Ltd. for the Cultural Resources Unit of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. MAJOR BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES Armco Culvert Manufacturers Association. Lifetime Armco Multi-Plate for Bridges, Culverts, Large Drains. Middletown, Ohio, 1934. The Crier [newspaper published for Edina Country Club District residents]. May, July and September, 1937. Edina Village Council Minutes, 1936-1937. City of Edina. PLAN OF TREATMENT The City of Edina has adopted the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide for design review linvolving preservationproperties designated Edina Heritage Landmarks. The following generalgel'nesaddressspeic treatment requirements of the Wooddale Bridge: 1. The historic bridge will be preserved in place and the existing form, integrity and materials of the structure shall be maintained. 2. The general treatment strategy applied to design review for Certificates of Appropriateness shall be rehabilitation, defined as the process of maintaining the bridge in a state of utility through repairs and minor alterations which make possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those features which are significant to its historical and engineering values. 3 EHL Designation Request Wooddale Bridge April 13, 2016 3. The distinguishing physical characteristics of the bridge and its environment should not be substantially altered or destroyed as a result of any action taken by the city. Careful consideration should be given to preventing damage from flooding or bank erosion. 4. The removal or alteration of significant historic character defining features should be avoided whenever possible. Repair and replacement of deteriorated features should be based on accurate duplications of the original work, based on historical, pictorial or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of modern materials. 5. Retain the original limestone masonry, whenever possible, repointing only those mortar joints where there is evidence of deterioration; duplicate the old mortar in composition, color, texture, joint size and profile. 6. Reconstruction of damaged masonry railings, head walls and wing walls should be kept to a minimum and the new work should be designed to be compatible in materials, size, scale, color and texture with the original stone work. 7. Necessary signs, lighting, fencing and walkways should be designed to be compatible with the historic character of the bridge and its environment. These installations should be carried out in such a manner that if the new work was to be removed, the essential form and integrity of the historic structure would be unimpaired. 8. Recognize the special problems inherent in the bridge's alignment and structural systems when complying with traffic safety and engineering requirements so that the essential character of the historic structure is preserved intact. 9. Investigate alternative traffic safety measures that preserve the structure's historic integrity. The City will make every effort to retain the historic bridge as a functional part of the modern transportation system while preserving its distinguishing original qualities. 10. In the event that the historic bridge can no longer be preserved in place for reasons of public safety, the preferred treatment strategy shall be mitigation by relocation to another location where it can be preserved and repurposed. If relocation is not feasible, the effects of demolition may be mitigated by historical and engineering documentation with measured drawings, large-format negative photographs, and written data which meet the standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). 4 EHL Designation Request Wooddale Bridge April 13, 2016 Attachments: I. Photos of Wooddale Bridge 2. Announcement of National Register Designation from MN Historical Society dated February 12, 2016 3. Plan of Treatment support from City Engineer, Chad Millner, dated December 15, 2015 4. National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 5. Location Maps 6. Edina City Code: Article IX. - Edina Heritage Landmarks 5 -4--- - „„,_ -,• •,s, ,f-:, ,,„"•B'4---,•' ..,.' , , , „ r—''„t f" ':' * `47 04:,!kir.V° ':'• y -7,4',,,,',I.. ,!, f ,1-- , •,,,,, .,,.,-. ' ' i •'' ' .-.'"( '',:''' ,:1;1, , .1;, l •.Y. 0 -- '•4''';,i' '4'...'4'.' '''4,--,' • '''''- -,'''''' ' c' i • ' ' ''' .,,,• ‘e, vr'••Vrl? 's:*\,..•;“"••-•:.,4'•:,- .'• ,'.• • 1 • ' ' ''' •,'`f: ft-k,'t, ,.t• i.,•,,,, (.,'• .:.'" ,, •• •,,' it't ,•F‘'."„.:141,'21 1-,' #5;fr''''':%., : `.',.,' :'14:4,2.:' P:;i:4';'*: ] ' : : V: 1 :;:l ',' •' V ' 4' ::'1' itl'i ''' :'' ''.4 ' ':‘:. ' ,‘"'::J 4':,,, ,;,;:,.... .'''.11i.ct --;',.• in , : : ': $,It‘. '..:' . ',Ai *4t:,''.»,ri' , ;:-..-;:)44104,•-'''i.1t-'rii.i.';:.;‘r;i77.-.Vi,Y*17..ttN'?;; ''-' 14‘ , . . -.,.v. I : I ! , i ':.'''g,' A •./4 , r't,l' .:it',,,i;'.'" . : ,,,f1;;;;,,:::,..i,'flq'''_.' r, ',I:7:A!t)'; ...,'5")3, '''''•••'-','''''' ' iT;l'in:7 7.1f:,,'..1.ri . , ' . , , , V, ,r ' .1, A,, ' ' 'tn;, ,itf . rE:1,,,r • .. t•r.n, • •:',.4--,14,v4t :lir 1-'.'' ! w‘ ''' -47?),' ' r, .'-,r,. ,tr-tt t I', :, :' ', " ', I ,, 4,A,,ri',.. 1.1 0 ; • *''' , --• • f 4i,V.:• .• ril?,, :r,/.. /4:4' •?-''-'• '"n,-,. ''.. ' , tit'.;,' -, ' ' , nn;' l'' . 1, ,nk:'','- - , , ' ' ,,,' n ,V-•n,‘ ,, il In 'Ci.':"I!,,Pc , qr;$1, ,, J.', ' '','.-#471/5: ' •;'-,*!':',''''.,L',,,,,' 3I..k .1.,:': t',,,f4:'i'. .1,,,,i'l:..P,-.3.„,,-,i.,n.-,n14,4 ,:',,'I )2. , 1,4,,k,ri, ' -:'-'n trn:, t •Or.,,I f c,::;;,,,,..,,,"Z--4-5,,,-;-,7 i-.',„ •,-,;•'' •.),7'4.in,r, :I 1.*•.;/:-,.,,,,...4 x.I.,`-,,,,,., •-•,---,7;r1t4 t' , t, 'I- 1' '7n I'11 In', I ' ,'t ti; -,_•c ' ''", ,,‘,:7/1: ' ,f:-.1.,--:_744r; --:',._*;?4.-'*,.. ,-.7:!,. itY,,,.-. i. T,Z'',_ - 1-1.42,2,:',.:31 k ii.• A41,,•' !," 4 11„1,. ,,,;., ,I, 0 6,.,1,it.,;-:,,',1 ,i,,;.1.i.‘, ,,,,,,,,, '15.24At ' .1,.:Z 0,',i,-‘r',,,.5','tt,...t, i, v.4,4•,-, ir:,.P',:1;?,1.! '',",,, ',-,1 ".-,-'t'rfelii::,:itk,.,,. 1 \7:', :{t,",:,: ),6I'i,k1 ;IFA n:'I / I' ,1,‘)ii,I, ,,,,',Nipi.,, J,,,'1,. . t. ‘ 0,0, - krli.',' ,,,,y,4., ,.,, •.:''.;.,,,,,,, ‘14,--,-,,,,.).:' .i*?,...;=.:-. ,A--'`..,-;.,-...'.--1-, .,.,-. ,•@-.1 ' ,-, ' '',t. .41',i,',1,.'!' II - 1:1:,' :: 11,;`0\ i'.'\i. % ,ilic,, ,•- 4'.'4..--f-, .i I?:ki. ,,,,tiv,,,,,,- ,..'4*.'..,'4 ,,z:;2',,:w ...A.::, ,s.,.,'.. „., \ i 1 .- n.i•,,`A,; 1' '0 1'4) ,.'.h Ne 6 '6 4' -:.," 4 ' ..„, ,;,.r-JAI' '1 _;-,144, -47--. /' „.,-fil..;-..,.;,„,i','&,-,N4:4:;:i''..ct,, ." ft.:t.:- •,..' -,i'v. ,...,;,— ‘e, 1,100 1 ' 4. „16- ,t6,4 . „i-..-., .1...,o_A.,, ...,- ,;.;;;,,,r•..lit,....,?:,6-4--f- .1 - ,,..,— ,,..vti.,;-: ,,,,,,...- 1„,, : ',',,,,,.. ,,.,,i,,' * ',,'Ai'iy,,,e,,,... .,,,.,,,,, ,,,, 1,. ,,,, 1,..,, ,0,,,1,urik.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,. „,,•-•-•!•,.:':„.t.'i.V.:', ,-'0 ./,•'•, ',,,rn-y«:,,',i;t*,, i '••••",',,,k, ,:c--..,-;:'!"''- ....;'' -1 11'' 4C-,•'' T, ''• ,..'''' !I',''' F,,t:',:41'.-'),64'#3:-:-.'.:k-',' 11 .,'II,'.' 'c'i 11,',, :647ks„. Vi:;:i%',--.,?.,,vr,',,,'.4.11,41,V...1).1--'',4;:it.'!,-0,,-',3:,41' 2'.,,.„-, - ..-.:',..., .4„,,x„.."4. .4',4,, 1 ''''.41,.,' ,A,',; ,ik. 014 „ „o;,,y3,1'.. ,lx.,,, . : i,k,..0, •,,.," -'4%4(;661,-..,..c,-;•v'll.1-,...''„,,,p.,i,,,,:,,'.fy,,'., ..;4.::;„,.,f.4., i.- : .-,'-v 4,•,,li ,-5..,,,;*.k.iy,'r, .1,1.1fritit -,,l' .ti,1..,,,:-,' , ,.°.'.,.?.,,*.'. ,,(i - •,IT v : -',,3.tuf--- ...Y-i,; •-z,...f41....vettr, • .%.t "., ,,.,-• -...f,)4,.:,. ..P,•4 ti ..t„:014!, .t•f.-':' , ,, ,, , „, 0 . . ,t ,t, ,,, , :,,,,,,,k',,u.v 4 i 1,, -,••• ,_•-4.2.4.••'•..,..:-.-•„:„.•,,P.„,e.:',:"„•?,47.1f 1%,-,7_-,,,,';.•,-... -4..k. :,.4..4 1.:-' .''),%-ky'1 0, -.E! '',..',' -.•4 'f• ''=:' ' ; ft N ..Ili, AI i,,:1 4t, 4 .0 , . 4 . IJ!,1`1,,,..": : ''),.:,:-%, i-,..: ':•-•;.-'''''if4I::'''');:4,•: 1•-• '''.,'I•f-,Z•4.42 .."•;,'Oft ‘••••,,y +4,1c'd --.t.0...22,,_ 4.1tvA••, --,:-.-,2.,, I :--- : . ,.:, -'? ..: A, ., . .!: , -„,/ ,e , 3° ,,,,;4 ' ,,, .': ' , ," , ':: . ,',..;6 ,1,0-,• . ',4, ,,.i?„----- 44 1,4 'q7,4, ''n--:-; .7,s v.,.;,-°,, '1!..,..4-,...„,,t, 3,16 r:ty`,,::: ' -...'4. ,sf,',' ,.. *--,.: '' -4.-.,1 ..-'iti ... ; i,:-,,..-' . '.;., '-..' ,,,-.„, *, 'o-' ,::‘,,-.:.:. ',., ,';,:':',.. , , ,,,. , .... : ,,.. , ,:,,,,,/,, ..,, ,.. „ , ... ..,,„.„,. ,,-„, . . -. . . .. . , , ..„ 1 f •‘4•!..:' ''-V.r.7:fY.1.;:f,''f.7''.'', 'Ai':.,,,f,'.,1',.; ''..:', 4•,,k 1 '''',*:"-•: :-.,- ''''-'•', :71'-.:;',4,,'' ",,-. - 4 '-• ': :-`2" '--f It 4:,,,.. .1 , , ,.;, ,'.. ",:'.1 ' ' ,,,::,,A ii, '', il,,', '.--•',,,,kilj/.)-TIP: 1.'1,1.,4'..4i4 :,,r'.....;f0,":1:141"-Pi",C,:-';');,:•Y.,:..: •4`- • 4:::,;, 4/1• X::,l'i-i'"'.;;;;:%fi. /at:,. : '.' 4 •'••„ ' : ' . ' ' , 4 I;iiit : Nr,r.v!, . ' . ,' ":-*z .. 13,,k,i;,• ,-(-','.:J2,,,'',.t.,..V.'''....: $1v4..,'''', •, .,',-,•,•7•,0-41.-A4 v.'''-,''',.3'-?,,''''•:,i 1 7,*t.,' , ' ... ' , ', • • ' , ' -,',',- ,,, ' '••.,i',,kkv, - , 1 lq.',..t.; . '.-Y;,_.4..-,- s•A-; ',\--1,1A;,.-14.--.--*:,',,..--.."-.' .-.5- Iv, AN---,'•-_,k,t, --,-.'-'.' ';- .. ;.s,.;,_ ' ' ,6-,. ) • 6,:,,,,,,-,:,, -..,,: , . . ' ,), KI: , !' tlq,:4-'1 .s..,;f4trYtttet'''',:.4,-.'1•:,:07,1,,Zel- „i':e::::1'';"st.l?e*-) ' ' . ''':4 -4'. '•';' -:''-";''''1 '17 tir:ii:''' • ' '1 "r; 'OW 4'','/.. •'-, ',-•••• ' ....4:111,••:::- if ,1;-•,,,,41''.41,,z,r?i,„ .`"Oit.t::•• )'•,,t.'..',4-i.Aii.,.)1,,',.1'.,;:•,.,:-4-',..,,,,,:, . :*:,k . ...'ik''..7, .4* i ...1,'N 'fir, ' 7 ' • r ',' ,I.,4„.I.VV''il i;,f,4,1, '- 1,,,..T: '4'.l' •• . gAi,- i r,,i ',„4-;','-.„.,t.,-.,,••,,,./:,,*,---,.,.-- .:'-:t1",-''.1-4:':......':i.l.rif'.:;:e'')-'4T, ,.!,,' .,;4i'&,-'ri,1 ::!,,,,,',.•-1,..* • ,,_.... ,• ., ,01 il lf,,,4*,,,.. •. D ,. i'.. 11.,t.' .' ,4' 'iiP!,11 ' p ,, •..witii-ss,...,--ik.r.,--7,,,..,--;,—„-„-?1,r.. '.:Ni,.i. .1 - A4',..,--....,1, ,., ,,,.; : .,, ,,..._.,..., . ,,,,i,k ,i:,let f,,,,,- .4. 1 t,... ';It '.' 0-„,,-42 t!•. . ,.....:.;,-11- '-it:,,th.4t.,",;., ',.7• --, Vdt-it ,i,,,•7_, 1,,:t.-7,--,i7,7".-., =_' . ,:. 4 ...i.4 :,.,,, ,,,:-.,,. iltil. ,I'f'1011 I '14tki,.1'.',7.'4,l' ''''tt. ' ,t,'t.4"Pttlet.17. t.:74,71;4 ,,k-'-'.4'..;:i*r.) 'ffi!e.:,,.. -.4.:-.4p4AZ:7 ''',1.•'-*'::: ''..' ip•iu',T,,i.„'iii:,.i.--.-:,1;cifiizi, *.Al ,', \titi'i.1,,•.,'lt:4',- -..,,.,,.4 .4, 't-...17 V, /3/4 I ..' 11 41/ %'..\T, ..1',.1 '',. 4!A.,4,1 V(4.... .'1..'.iik,-4PF.I's-"L.,4''ft.,'•-...,?:,,,,A•••••='7,4.,..p,t...P---,te4--...A,.---4.::::::-..-iii,..--1-go .:-- '!,;:,.,:, 1..4,,,': i'zi,„•.:4-.!:11,14,---.7;2•'-- —-'4''' , .. .4,. . -, -r "1 4 • '-'"'....'": •• •• , .,,,,,,,,,,t,A'.r.,.17,,,t f':-.-`• ^1,-, 2' 4 ':' ' . 1.•"-:':::"'XI"''• -C-4 ''':2, 4-', ., ii4Z-,..-:01,,:.:St .',it, , ft_..-, ,_.:-• ,.., g ' '' "''-'--.....k.',,44 k•.::. : , --.;•-?F.'10'-.'-,-,:,-,-,7,44-,',-; - 'in; .9.-4; , i ,*.., r•i',',', r!--1•A:..1r-,--7--.."-'7'':• .%, . ;• -'--,° n-n..in•,-x-6:,---1: .-,- ,.-6 -- - ----;''11 : k:t.,:kt•41-"' ,,,,'..',,•(...,':*•'/::,',,:%...;..n: V--Nr;_,I•ii ` -4* 4;4;--* -_-,' . t •, ':•i i'4'.'• ‘f'I;41,Orne .1 ','yd. l''' ri p',414'`:•'1 '+04''.1 If .. . r‘' .,,,:'k,.,,i f i , i igi 1 ,,"f„,/i, ' ;‘)..,.I4,A, • A ly 11.6-1,A. -' -. , '3., -;fti;:,,' - 1, t . ..i ' -=...,:m. AW, -1-.:-.4',''...t' l:;•.t..4 ''' 1.f v'''.. 1 i6c'.;'-.+1-.!?' •.. .,..f ' 4 3.,if, ;n - ,•';',.' '4.,,i1:1,', 'll:•,--' '. •-: S q'4• ei-7,7•1 iii7-''':.•.' ! -tw.-,•:. •::.',.!--.,r,•--V- ' •-..‘t 14 V't 4 ijit://li l'er• ':-.1:•' I'''fq:'''f-,"'cli. ,1 ' 4.-: ,'''' ',:k.- rA..1 7.•'',-P--.f. ',' ,:.,- - .:',-,‘ ' '''... .-.'''',`...''....1-...%'..•''i .-1 .' ';',. . 'id.„'..,•!, ', Cl'''''' -'1 ',„r11,110' ','-‘ii : '..ij'1.11rt ,,1::4, •-•'-'1' , 1 i i ..'' ' ?.'V ' .1-- ''.:'''',. .-if',°,''''.. ..? 1. ,41:;,./;.:)., ,..' . i'',.=,;.-.,L,,,--.'-t, if.i", ,.., ,.,.. :• I. ,,,', 1, n 1 ' '•It.',-ve..11„,.. ,„7 -A. fi-„,--_- _,,i.--,-. -:7--i.,-..,:-.-6._-' *'' r;'-• z...;_ir._ '°.--- .--7!i it ) 4,, At4tra,7 ,,,,,,,,,,,',44, f ,:, 44.4 t'..e..1,,,,,,,,,,',,, '''''0?k,.t.i if':'''''. . ;',r'''';i ,I-''', 77.'''''. 4. 4,•'-'fit. •,"-r.' '---------------,:-:-__ 2/,-- '7,.7.. .1--.‘" -,..-..-,'il,•,.. nr •,,,r-'',_;;-,,-e.,,,r7g. - ''-"- ,. A L.1•1?-:.-,-Z -r.;;."--i•,-42,--.--''':- i p,,'..„ - 1 IN. i • ..„N,%. - ., „,,...1.,,,,,..„;,...„ -,,`;',•-,42,,,,- ,,-,..„:V.,,7,0,J,i•,,. , • :' 2',1,. 1. ricri:%;••••,.k..4, tSft::'s-` •._ .„ ' ,....;:, -.--:. ,it ,,.. ., , ,,c,-, ,,, , ,. _ ....,: ir"-:- ,t'*i•'-'‘fr---!.--''' 'Vr.!''',,-.-,.... i_ ....,, . ,',-'''_ ;frit..,--'' --- - 41 46.'' •- - T ''-• -', ,'''''.'• •---J.r7-•,:t-,•-,e:-.-'•-.:',.•--.-:-!;:,••••:'-`;-, ' -•241'71".,,,,,,,-';'''''''''q-',I..; 'C.". -4W5-1 - ' .'--'---, ' '‘.--e. ' ' - •!--- skL•-,4i ;43/4;1,1', 1,•l''' Ovi ,•';•-f t.:,,r•lr,40.e.;,---L:--:-.:------'---- 1.- -.A.'-'4----','`,;174'...d.:Wi'' '' . - 4016°'.-.:•:;1-4: -- ---'1--"' .. -': '''-17.'-':.--"-•-',51 ferirS. l''' ' .if: '‘SYA,',,',..,••••kt:i2, 7-i. •'''- '.---•':'-__ •- _-,-,,ii'l,,,';.4Tr'gt-_'' - , '.-. .--;---.-..1"..=-:: -- ...-- --.:, ,.7,..,,. .-..-, .- - ..-*--,-5--. I- . •.., .A.;;1 r•A': , _- ....Z.,,,-4:--",•,- 2' 4....:X:-:,-' :'---- t,, i:: ;443-!;-. :.41'''X'2:1'-';‘ .•'-2-- - -: ---' - : "':,:-'414--,:\,'.:-'4F:-;--.. 7--4•74 ''''-'44%"•- :-,.-::::-:. :9,:S,W;-.',-:-' ,,,,n:,-• - .-..;-_.;-0,0-,__-,, • „-- , . ...,,,-41' ',44.-7-:7--_,_•------rfr--,:ff--. 4-,,',:,'Z'444.1F•.''''44.-4.iti Y.:--„4„, ',., -- - •.,„, - •..,- - I _ I, :4'.'1. "•.'2'4:':':"---,',-- - -"-----,-. 4—,44-- .___st,, ...,.„:,---1,--..-:-..,,:,..-. „_-_,;;,.....,—,:. ..,- ., -'.. -,,-.-.1 ft,741.;;;--_1--,t,t,',,-:-' ' _ - .- .„,_t.„,-„,,,,, ,„ ----_,,,,,,,,.-- ,..riz.• ,3*--:',"".-n;--.,.,---,.:_,-1 :--.. .... ..,.,...**-4,;',F.,-,1,..i.'..,..•,,.:.":••.°.----•-7 ,"r -'%•%,..-_ 4.•trs•;.„-4,-.42 irj,;4447--,' . - - - '1,4,ffiX',%•,:•••',41::,;%-2;74_,41-_,k,_,?_1,_._.•4•._7,--,2-r-q_77-r--- ::-__"--,",' .--. ----.."------s•-,7 -4-__' .,..5•.,.,-... 4-,,..77,4 •=•,44,•,-='," - - - - '''',''''''' - '4' '''• ,..21°' '-'1.1tb:',,,, 't!' • t• •'''4,,.' - ' -:-"---.-t: _.--.,-.•!-,..-4.„...tt.-:‘,....,x„,-.4",, , nr.,...147 .„ IIIf . . '.- _ . , - . .- . ,•ii .-;,9,-,.,,,-. -,,. ,-, ,tr,:pif ,,: . ------ ,'-',• • -..., -r - • „, , ,. -t..... - -, .. ., 'i E , . _ - _ -'' ' . ::, -- .,,L;,.., •i' y....s.!-'-,fr..N.,..:..0- :., ,.......,,..„,.,,, ,,,-1,.......- ..,, -.. , .,. te' , - „.:.: , :'.. ,: *. ',41U-, .!..-',,.,-f-, -. .-'-F,',...44,r4i- ''-:.."•' ri•f.,,,,--,--: -•:, ',.,. : --':- . •••Y 'zi, ,40-t7,,,i,•••••,-,"'... ',i ..t.-..#-- •ii..,-, ,OL,,,--' --,,-.,,,',1 '.i' - 31- --"-----,-,,,, `-',4"r1A-,-- - 4 • ‘0.1-6 ,4g;r: ''''‘,.•_'• ''',',.tr--r":-.0,-:.!„:„.,, ' - .7: -I: ' ' -.. - :: ' ' , c :''• :-‘,:'•"--;::::'—',.:-fi,cr,', '.‘"-f;4' lf,,. ..X--4, .-':1:7;1-1-414 1,...:f -0„.,‘„i!!,..- --1 ,:t5:,=t,'-'-st.-u---- 0,:,i& :71..v: -,-?'"....,iii•-• ',. _. .., ' IA --',''''.-4-.1.7 --'' ' --,_:. ' -•, - .4 ••....r. •;.•,•• ,-ii ,.2 , • . . ' ,% ., , :: ,, 4".%2,5f,f)4,, ;•,., ',8,,,•12,, - .4-‘.:*71' Otfr•'',J, %.!..4 4,,I : , - - ::' ' +: '-'- •-.,.*,.: '' 4 I-.%•4' -;;IA,,i',- :- - - - - .., . •,. ' , . .'• .,1 _ i.','-`-•-•,--f'-',-,,;• -.•''• ', •' -,- • ,..;._ - _.•- !Are,. '' • - , - -_.: ' __ • , ,• - ''',- ;•'-' - ',---•—••]:t--', --V.•-•-'''•'' - '• . '.•:.---- = -•• .-.4;':' l'' gt , _ t.4•,'.."' , -.Pt: .'xi . - :,:.,Y,;.-:;',,,,'..,- ,._V:-..'.- - :1‘•7.l'45j • 44.,,, . ,-.:".•,--It--,, ,:- .1-..:7:'-', -::..-'r"---''`i . , ._. . 1 , ---- ---,I•"J It , • .1..."'''-Pi)!4''',:,,-:-.1.:Ii'•,,,..t-'`--g ;:','..:1,...',...*"..':;.('' I:- :• ,,,,,, '..'1.,i'Ait '4. l' I f.'. -.,,„+:-.,*7';'.. -,11Siiit.\'‘'.r..,,,,,,:', . ,,,- - .,.,, -,. ,,,,i•ot. or-' - i . ,, v--„.•;,7,-,.-„,,F4J7.-;,.-7%:IV' ,\ I \, (t, t‘%!1 - ••! ' - fit- :1)i., ..,:,v,-.&--.,•-,.-,-''.:,:, l' \-_,'Ocl",r- ,'--r`r•,•'-'..- --- •- ' - - ''!-'. : ' '‘ .' '. , -,-:,..-.-'4.1ff'.. :.-.41,._ .004,N1,',.ct.ij,'0; 0,ft? ../.... 6r,'-':' . ..- •.'1' ',:;,'. •4-4.. '-'"'"f?,'%,*--iii•-".,?--,-"i ,i.. ‘+` '. ..-..,...tu,.,3.. ' .*.-1 t,Irs.a.-,.` _,..p.-...A •"' Ilk ift• ..2...;.--. , , 1 r,•ir- .,,.. •- ,, *.k" N V-F.,..:tti.,%.111.' ii'-','',t • ‘1' I I • I`, -.IT.:i,' . i i V- ' ..tt-..,,44 -,.rg, y'' i '4 i',1-''',.' .- -, '''.., ..,'74'.',' '_ . ':'''4' ' •-•'' :'444%. '..'''4'1'4,, le,,• . ' . \ ' '7 '''' '•• e/- 1 4 .•'-si,_:,.-p.,,.!..... .i.;1 . ..- ,,. ,, 4„,1.,...L•-,_ : .-.: ,,;.•,,...:T4 i rt. , , - ; ' .."4.....r.'dc:."4',,', -.: •.447; ‘'..---'' -- ' ' .'' •- '; '-':.--' ,'„;;N, *,'-- -'' i' ' ,'.:::>-••i -sk••--4:` 4 ...‘z . ...-.... . .. ,. -tr•-•al''••• * .).c• Y p - ,---- •.• 4'5 ir*-4..* 2.,r Ot.. ,A. ,V, V . P 1. 4 ,i: ., .., 844:.X.—.S.,:t.'.:'-.,'4, * q...14' i- '. ' . lit:" ''..,' ` ... .. '-'7".,17,:-•4 7 .v- , , , i'' '4 t...'- .If_;,,,"/•#:''f,•4•3:7,';;',:-. .,;4;INL--, *2- •:'-'• ,----- 1:, • . 10; ' ..t..r /. ., :*.ii-, '., ,'4_.,7, ,--''7411-!-, ,,,„.•qt.•••,. '• '. .‹...-11...W‘ --;.);.,Ak4A4V . •.,..'..A...4-`-.'--':• .:.-- - 1 r"-.',A. ' , '' b41 71, .A:,.,..i....1 4 ,. -_-_ ..-J.,„ ..:‘,.•,..,to,,- !AA,zo ,...,-,-, i-', ,,.,, ...0'.1•••;-,Ai-, ., -.../....r',4".7'.«....:j),,,• 1-*'5'.,,, 4\_-,,, 1. . 1: )2-:"' '-4,-;.A,74. 1 .- • -C-•.• Ii k ,1,-,. ,"!?.“-'-...t.-ir,2t 4.:*.-• • t., ._1,.= e .„L ,, , .4,,, , A-,:', , ,..••,'c'7 ... .'"1: A.,..- - • . 1-• 4.,10 , ....-- t,t - ,- - 1 • ;„,• .4 q--. .-.': - 't lk,. . -. •-1 . ... .44; '1/4- ..-, --ffr.k--,. )..-; ,,,„,.1 -i,. , - •).. . '. -,--f- it, .„.4 __. „,,..., i. • ..„_ . „ 4.. e.. ...t,, ,„... ... ...,,,,,i A-..„-A„,„.!...., , -, ,,..,„ L. ,.,„,,L•-... „,.. L...? •1,,.„4.,„LL , .3( '-k% Itt'C ItT.44.-7..',:4-1raf';i:'''AO ‘'a• ' •'• i s '''•' .`"1: Ayi,\''' . s'''.-1' ,10#4,1.''' '.."..-..c,'" :', 'i'.. ••• ..1.--7'...,;,, '..14..±.,4 i;-.:'_!:,.; ' ,.... " "...,., ..:i. . .`,;‘,. ',„'' : .'5.,:v;'....-.7,1i, / •';", -.-r ... 2-'!" '',, -i-L-.A.,1--- „..j91:::.„-„,„:•.o.;; , 'I ti ‘ t , avkl ! . ,* 1,'''.:.''...0.-4.-1.,,.:•,-;:-....A:i::•':•'',:;';-•1 ,,•-••--..,f,:, 5*-- ,.., :•-•.,,,, !:..--t '' ': . ',i4•C':*.*..'t:_I.'ir *.'' , ' •., '.•k. ,..!.;)$ -"t'1.4, - a."`",j4lite'',.'' ..i '• : , -40.-' t'Af . .-, :.--.4,,-. ,s-,3N„-,..,1.„;4 , ' CA . 4?• ' - . _•:, - -so I_•. ; i ,,,q;**•:2:to:/:,!'''ICS •r , :', .-.-,-T, i , • /44„ .1; ; . 4.-..., , .,s1,4,101,1,....! ...4,• .1," -: , , i.-", ,---7 ' -- ' .; -li•-4.4 i -',.. •.-. .„ • , Is '- '-..•-` • *•:- - ,.,.: ,,.. -,•,,. • ,-••• .ss.4 ..-. .. . _. • • • . ,k sit JA'31 , "pi.e.w."--, r- tit-it - _'i ',...• ..,,/cr •.esze.,4,....Z., 0 ..s• A. •...A., t' . , 1,., '•''„,f. t- IF;0- i sky :•, **-,--• '•--• •*1/4 ....','--:' ,,,---.4-'4. . ,.--: • ,.. - '-•-.....) f„,,,,, -.577.r....1 s -i;:- ,,',44'._• • ' '•• '412 1:..• 4.' ,1,,1; „': -.1 I, •'3 . A II... ' Is Al i.;. 1-1. . . ., ' • =4 A. •• ...., --.'-• ,'.... ..s . ,..,• 'i ''s • . , . . c. -: , • - - ,- -,F. :64.'7 ric 1. 1,,-• ,74..--- - 1.-,,,,'It- ditli ..,,,, '-,-;• -,,,•• ..Y `...,_:-.' - i.; ----- - 4.1:; 1,-.^Ift.„fil,,, ,• 1 , . , • •'''• 1.; :I '.. i J.'"'-':;,,..44?'1.i t,.i -.`"i4..„iiI° ',..,,-4.r .'.7f• '''• \,\N 4 .'4 '.%..Z•74'.. 44'. 'if ..101.4 1:IP -.1i 1,.• - ;.t..,,,ik "• ' *:.?,' . . ,,..,--.....--, - •,4„ c„i. , %, .4. . . , .4,11,. , -4,;"-'' • - 'Z 4..6..",;•b-.,,4".'1. T.--, '',4, -, • • _ .-i.,---!•p.1-_ i' , .. , '•'!.:::..,L., ',./ 4.,1 ...- 4-1 ih44/••13 I.• ''''.' : - 1 •,.+, .. - •0.- •:- - P.-.4:11 .,` '.-,e'. .°4 4:- ..; ',i-,:: -; 4::,,v•-•;'._:-.L-- '--*-•-•. , ,...4-:taele; 'rf' i..11,-'' 1.4-.! 7 4,' '1', ...___ , - . -'.4-' . - e- , ' " ' -1,- -`. - .-6: -.142•T ,-,'Liat, Ark, ? 14,,, ,` ir.:1,i,2-i ; vi.t-r;,,,. :: . , ,6_ i . • 1 i 1-4'--;.!7-::,:•;-4,' .1!.4,-.r?,-;-''Itiik 1 . ' .-.;...k 7_',1:.%1 x-T-',... 0 , ' ,,i."--..•.... ,,,rn ,,,,N-qi !i.'i'. '' .. 4' '' l'i ts ‘s. 1.•.- _1,4,, 7'. •- Irk.. -1111/44 °.,,.4:1' '-...1.31-L,k1:k3,-,,,-,i:P1'17 .; '1.„ ,... -r- 1,--- ''',AY1:‘•ii''.1 ... ,". 'T - . , .., . . , . v;:1.1;r7 "-;•„1-4'_ ',.4-`'-.1 - 4 Lai ,;;..r,.. ,'AfiCa, '4, •&iv,. , ' ;stit-: '..,-r,-. . 17-) •.,..0; , , • .i i ,---a . , A 5'... ,--P, ''Itrl.4'.V1W1.*:- • 4 ItINt ',. '4,'1''',17' Z+"--.'..-.-. 4/4 4.2 "4" if i• ; . 11" qf ,j,, ... • ,. • \ ht, '. ,.,; ,.'...41kAi:*- )„,1 ' !..k.:,A .li II'.',..Li,.i1. ,-,=,..',,,,!:.._;f 4474,141.74' 1 I 16,4, ..,,.) .1.;:i I •.:1,5; ,L-;--11' • 3,• Pi!''` S. ii,...-:,-, '' •'. n* -15:-/- . ,:_•_,_ ,''. :-'7'...:;:"=: `1‘. i, a '...,40: I. p, 6, ,;',.;‘- , A,=.•7 ' 7-- •- -, - - ---- ' 41sh. i. .:t•-s - _ ,.,--,—, . . 1.. ., . .,, ,,, „. — , III 't ; ";,( 1..V„'',''.'' ' • Airi, y: ''..--.,, . .4't • '''4'1 i 1 „ II,. it 4, .•'t..' ii • 4 c:41J.' '-."' ., , . liTtiSV ,'-',.....U. 1.j . ; los' .s,.*1.!...'--. . ‘, . 4,:• ,:,!,.' , ..' ',' ' '•Zs.i". . x •,,.',Pr • .0,- • '`.1< - •11,-• ,•is • i`-s.‘4 mie, A.k- 4i!'•- ,,,, t .4,' :. ' — firl: ...A -- :.y.4. i- y-.---- .0 .4 . .:. ,,,,-4 .., ,•v, - --y, •, -.•• 7:,........ _- r , f,„. -.. ,,, ,„..„ . ,..,ft,.....7,....1, ,..„ ;,,,!,,,. ,.. .i. 1.,,,... . . .. . . . ,I.1,75...4A r...• .- .„-...•--,1,/m- .1,,i4:-. ,4-4 4 Jo • . .--411 •; , - .. ••• , ,._. , -• . i -.. - 1 - . t:.•,' , . .„... A,--.ilr •• 7,. ,. • ,, ii, t,•-, . ..,,.,.,z,_, ..... . ., .., - • ‘ it ' • ! 1 4 ; iS ! • v.•et.-4"- • ,•' 9 ,-,t,.. . ' • t, ..,,ri&- , • - - ” , ., (7-.11; 1..!' -.\'''' , / ,.'/-i....• :A".Zi 1 14:: 1 -‘-,- --. f' c'*.' I.-•,,,. ''-'1',AC .::t.''4)*P'' !a--••i "‘t. 41.:/-" '•1 'if ". '' '.1 '' !Fs: ; : - ;',',-- .•rAl. .. .1,2, ..4,.' -.. 11.1 ,,. !.-.• 4 i , . . p.- - . r •• , ' 1 ' -• ' _ ....-4 • . ii•.„, .. 'i-t-li _. _.1--' k__..1".07-I,` ,,,--i. • . - ,....,0 : ':', 3 1,,,Yli , ' i .;1* lr' fe .!it; " - p• ,,,•'-, :+r-, ,.:•,,-4,... . ...,; „.,, .:,-...„._•„41.,,„k. , ; ..,9 Ili, „la, .; i.. , _,„'l tn.. if.1..,,, • 10,..., ,„ • . '' -:A,t--.,0 , igt,,... „,*!I, „I: :i.:.,--,.3,54,,r. — ,, -;,- - ! ktift,o, •. ,74'-'' kyr,,i• • _• ‘.4h _,•• -i•:, Xt.-, . •.,,,..;.,........: ,..z..e- t...gi.' _,,,,,,I,.,,,,,. . IT::,,,,,...•,..,,, ,.. it! , ,2• . , ,i,, , ,.; . , ,,..t. ..,(•,, , . •,) -,, ..• 0 4, . .. • ... ,4.7.- i , • • : - ..-..4- t •/,• • 1-1.4. • , ,) ,:1,,& „...•,•••!•••.; •,„__ ,.• 1 .,..-5:. : .-toi4., . •,- t... ' _,' . I, . , .-;.,,,, . . . ..t.,„,I, .. . },k ,.. ,, % ,,,,,k , , I . . .1 ....._,L--ois.t A ').'1..,..).'''..i.•,..4.:' , . - • .1 i ,. , ' .41 •- .1.-4. -; •,i k t .•-,,, '.1-'-iri ,.,4''• ,•,` t',,,,... .--•4 •''; . , -- - - -,it N • i ,;-1 !. ii; "., - ..,‘• .,....-.s, •1.- .,,,k,. . -- 4 . , 1 - k I. N-' * Peke':r'S -' --•-• if ' i...,- ,oft t....,.,, „... ,.., .1 .. , .,,,.i- .,, ..„ / •., v , ._. „ r. , ‘ ......„ i r-,,.,, , bit„.• .-- - , ,I., .„ . . . ifd k... i f-• -,:, r.Z.'...,1.i' .-'' -;.- - • ''' ' . .. . . - 4. 1 , , .,. , -.:;-,.,-..in It) i :. .„.,i„,•,,,, ,.....,* - :,.... .. , ,_,-, -. .:, ..,. f. 11 •• , ' 11'-s. x , 4..... ,.....,..-. , . Y 1'?, I. • s'ilk , i ,'".• :!".1klit , ,, :i , 1 A ,,,i iv .$t" t1' . • ' ?. , .':' . 4 • 4 ,TV?-7.s...• 'N W-- ' N 'i t ;"-: .'' ' k li ti 0.41..i . . - .i. ale!' .- , •.0 45:rl''' • . V. . ,It.... '....1.'...*%....:11 -‘i., 1;:_r, ( q , si .„,.... s.'... •.....,,,, • .1,• , '''' I' •40-:!,,it ' ,•‘. , : !.- „._- 1 .1: . , . .1 I ”,. 'l''',',.1 li 1 'r' -49.-.• r-A • Ili :,4, .3, ' Agiw." - I ' ) ;„1,.j:' . *1::)::. --.'67-1'.. ..•`-,' . .i):I.‘.',-',I4: 0, d ,,,,•,'IVI ,,,- ..1',,, . 4 'I:. , I, 1 t•k lt,t „,_,, ,„..,, P., -:,-., 1,',. Ai,' ".. 'j f..„. 1 r,pi: ',1,;ii. ; 1!), •• , ')'! • ,: • • .;il•‘11,1,••.,, 1 s'."',ii*:,•,i .-'',4. ' • ••"..• -.,-,- r- - '- • ,: 'IL' ' a,„ ',,,...i• ,. •• . .,,,,-• .• • •• ,): ill,. ....„ ...,,,.. ..--, -,, ....„,„,,. ...,... - ...; ...„,,.. t.,,,,,. ..;.)..,,,... , ,,,, ,.,_ . •,,,A,,,,,'• ,. • . . , t'l -*-,1. •-;•' -..,. .,•.. -4;11'4''•7--1 KP.--',,:orr-,,•-.',..,...---'• ,: ,,!,•,. ,,,-.4.,--1- 54 4, , 5'-i ,•••••• .,• fwis• 5-, .9 4ill ,• . .'I.,....• e.:„..,, ..,,..... ,, ,,-.;_•,,,, -,,..-: . . • . , .;3, t..•.!,•5„ ..,f:,..:., \:._•._,•,• ,/,1,-, :• ,,,, ,•4,'''.',..:Y ' 'ilift3/4.1i' . .1 v11,1- 1 ,,C-4V:'''s •'-'../4' ',7",fik.' 141;:.,,''s A.4,, . ;--.„p:,,,,..4.-, ,r,-.42,3,-;t1.,-i'-',,..,,,i'i;-,;.".,,I.-_,ff.,.-,.;.k.?-,..?:,,,..e'.:i.: \.1.1 ',,,!,.:1.., IA ir iiVi.,,,,!. tot-E,Ilii;...,. .'•.1.,F-f:- ...'. .. ..-i, .. 1, , 6-th i.• ,...... .:i.,.., . .,,y-l.m..,•ik'VAto.)50 '-% .;-' '.+,+!Ir,..,..' ....1-'/;.4',.i ,.c".1.,••,te„,,,..:4!? ,,,,t.,::.,,.,, T... --.1.I, ",,'''.1.0`,-, •1 :', (y, , Iv:, ,. 0,-4-1,- ' • ' ... .. ,.. 1 ,s4,1.:,.. , .;%.. . -.• • -s.,..o.• ,.i ;,I.J,•,,-).,'::d.•,.. •-•'.-, . ••,f.,.;,..,...,nv -,..,..,..yeit .•Li,,.,LL 6, ,,,, ..,,, ,LL,•L ,„-,;#1 ,,,,•,,,L• , ,,,,4,..,.7.,,,,,..,1;zi.;.,,,,,(4,;,,,. ,.:11 y fio_,.9 .--0-- i',,,,'' -.' c 4 0't V l'A \''' ' ' . . .- ... 46%4,,,k'. . t,f4".'1,,,.;'t„ ,',..,•?,,,,,..:.19 .../..,:-V:1‘...."V`"iii'CI .,,t. ."4•,N0142 ,.......•' "I ..i....k, 1, ,1.,,,, , v i,.. .....,.. ,•.. r" ,.-, • i +fit,4 1, ,-j-P,r,,, • :' ------ A . - ,;" ' -. 104':It,'Aff.„, • e! i i •, 1, ' ' ...'Sill I ',/,' ' , ' . ;: 4,44.:::.:,„. ! ., .. . ', )g . . . .•.1, ._ ... 1 b ' 'ittof-0,04: k.1;',.•;--' "'6?". ' ''' '''il ,, i, ;','' i*:'', ,___,. ., . _ .04":#0,?:;4* -'1,45S-14';'&&1,..i. , ii 8 .....:•-- •,:*e''', fi•i-A_:•-,‘d 4- r'•-• -- '''' - 7 b fi, --.1.Y./:4,"-.4.C.7.:: 'IDI 4 `�" .ap{4 ,.. F ytfifi ::' '� ^ h rte 5 - j 'zt` d k �� ki FY %.''' • P., 1::". 14' ,'11::)::1:171::1-1;1::,:':-.:' 0: it'''':'''' ,:::'‘''S:111,'*.':„:" 1/4'_:::;(''''': .!:`1'7,::..,,:: ,/:f /, k: ii' r r .',J..; 0. t f r, , ¢ M :t,':.,, !�I t , r t, S I a?t ,1 .y, r 1 {,. } � rYr Z Kj t r *, ,t , ire' i 4 S.,,s;".-'34. ' V • ' 4,', II '''" • s si3r _ 1 VT .i, 7 i x . E f. ' -.- i .. p -s tr .s 1f .-4 i • � -4 4� f y ` •a ?4 {� is a r 11 �' ''*,r4't 'P� v / � a x n -'' .r' '?•- Y Jfi ' f a ; '''',--16.7 i t-•-!" � � •�`. �. ¢ � Citi rF ! _ t F}t* f l�* '� �.�... �'j.../ z a,4: • .: ,ik, ,4 kD°,k r i'y .r ,r';`.,, , 'r' "_i= ..} h1 I 1. rr 1'1.' ya1„,, `-TyflgjYe.q .. t•z stir�`e� , � � +s -"'''="'‘,:41.'.,0,-t- srr�, '� � d !�,' 4 41 �),�`�� �1.. _ 1,77,1‘,-.-, 'red”. �• t ,yrs ., " t- t ,a d", FF yY ,..,',7::.''....,.-,, n &&uu t. [,,., a' (3 �. f '�.. i �6 '.�1,z2 c---,k,,, . I, ,M1 }� fir, y `'q y ! fi- a r15a r. >ee..,t ,'�'" 9>•F_h dd ry. , .G'i� f �"ID °.-•1- , 'C 7- s•g•-4-- _'t �I ��i I F 34, y t • �. •:,,,,,::,,,,y *. i Z t '$ 5 i K� .A‘14 3 Iq r gni~ f ' y)411„...... 7h�y� ( . ... 'i, R"t E y,4 #i7 :1 i `: fi? y(.-/ ...} ,.. i` }• t ..c.'' a d*�+ ' ( t''S ,i:•� �' ' 4 .. r .,..v:to t3 r.. `lf` =F� .�'4, Et 7 {� *it' �. y, .y p S `� y r V 2 NA I Y Z$ "1 J) 'i,. 11, k 5}_ t ;'' J t• F S A4 , tom. ,•'-,7 ; 3 `L�,, - .'�} A`y'°.' '�1,,'..,'it ' ' k 1 ,. s; A 41 G FI t,l,. a tae 1 r rm_may p k� �1. y9 f'+: i_:� r t.•„ 1, .;yt'� *t., �'-zif h1 r,L Y'' w r :moi; r. .t}�i '•!r-; ✓ 5 t F t k' f'� r �J'" �1,' p "}y-4' lLt4 L., ,E:71 ,,,,k1;',:,P.Z 3:,11,:i 1., i*,e , ' .�,��. .�+�. � � � �,t x t� a •30-44 ., if, °�t.. J. t $54{'z f•' t� '41,11:t �s,..a 'j {:''�'F � -Y'°in,+.•�_ ir 31;i Y[,�,j,'�;4 i� - t�� 4, 1.1 ., 4 :‘,..1.V..- }1:A,�yyo�p' it ''47-z,,•• ,-,+9� -,0,,,,,,,,,,,,,,*. 'i 1. F,a�;Y tr #:4 if *, 7 .s ',t �i; , a, Vii!" I 3$ 2� #T,k 1-- .,:.-.--::!: 1..-5.0.,...,----: 5yf X...,-- I. ,. yr _:`:,-.4.,i',--. ( - I r'.r ,., •'t,' tea * ' ,4.�... � ( 7,c*'r s�€t ! fi �` lit` 4t .y. �f Y -t r' f 14 4I S ♦ i.r � ' 7A�' 4`. . 1m l%WA 21(f-tA',y" q• e '� • : ,k}"1 ss t;:•::*-11.'''} fir' 1, '.y>+4 - % y,°' .s :Tit .it,„5t 45 p �$?r x-�SL .� f. " s5' ',.4 I r ,� xs i t f s r is > r{s‘41‘r,,, i S. t. s r�, $- '�' 7*' 1. �a art �....� sy.'[F t 5 c r t ° �. t'". Zrr ,„ ( 1 ( , C ,-4,,,,,,...,4,1=4,,-,,,,„,,-:•' ti. i:' e • f z-.' ..., ;, F '4,44' c �I fiy �.k,.. .--,,,4,,. Fcy' s-;`4.'" �T �_.= ,�y, r 5>a s ` „,„ a ...4-411X.,,,. �,tc. �h�fi!7-' R� f fF j f Yj t t 5 i"'^a , L t # .c,�..`. fi�t,, 4,�•y�1r eti. Qu ' 4.7*,-,,,,,, ' G s. .1...;3;;.t.,-;.-1.- Vit' ? Y -�.°5 •: as < t _ z # i 4t;i °'a$-c,,V ti*,' 5 tVs .!a' t 5 54 F„)--,t,-, i t' w itt",i,, ? , + `.',,. .s ,`'4 � r1` QTS f k ) t, tel` C + 9 -‘VI fir? y a t i` Tc x� �T! a�,. • �� a fa} -,-- r < '*'; 4ry r 7, ! `�,- ( t:;114?' { tt ', ,. i.P..:�r ri t z! a h 'lf�`'14.7a,, i4c 4•� 7 } t?"1: xx, ! 5 .S „": 'r(!4 +!, ^t'F,Y. 1 f_ I l e ', , ! vFz i e ".•. y +- ,:, - - . ' ,a':"-_'-'-.:-44'. ',.'t-Y-44 n ib- lir sT irt,Id 14."•;,,, 40 ' ,, , 1 •' '‘, ' .4 ,., ;-.''1,'„*1, .,,- ;',/" ` ) , ,• ' ., r., it .-' ' Ai& ' r r s• P o.„ r bt,1' • 5. ..yS.,' ?. Win: n I a. . f # 4sy "�;',� ._ i ,�* ' Pa J #' fit .: s- p e xfi r ,. it''...' r5 f �r Ws. ''4 r ' a"rl Pie fY,.^.}:'224'40 �� r�"�}'cc�. � a _ .� j�` air =Li 14 K ! ' • • ti r'y) y1 4,,,, yIt I.),G1sr, l ` '1,-,..!...?.4' 13..f.:'''''': f '( ,Fs rt , �° � 4i r �° P�i ....'''‘A •S,y i. Ilf 1. c h [ -, �47wi L� ,. tr�� �' h> t Jk s "4.: I.' v'! 2 '1 1 t `k. ,, ! ',--1-:i. ! h'. ..Le. .+ Sir' �.4.. 1 y ,• Pc .St tl�I. y ' 7itF't ^'�^. _ .fes:r rff t. 3 r� 1i fit{ i _ �'� . , tt fit} ( y�4QE 14 4 r( t�, , 1, � Sd I t: p # e. 1 +iI 14\ ,'. L ,XA• s S� ., - �. ,Il f 3�'' h .. t r%."} � `�r � 1 }\� t -„�G � �� �' - ti L', 11}I k I .+t;�*P t !_ v,..;.,,,...,,,..„::.4.,..,:,,,. t 6` • t ,�+ ,:',•• ..r9�r;:::`.-'•r ' •f e5; d y..r 1� < ' yt L1 • C .4,,$ A'+,i, �•e'>r= t ,� ',4 1. ,•- r l �$ j,'• �,t t`'� .. �' f '3 `x y k r z e.+�ss. . ��a '} r �� s � • � � '�v�`#,';.� 1•�1` � �""� i( ��_5 fp .-'� ( � .•'.:i [)14t.� ••�.�,>.s,r ..,Ef�s�� ,i ftt- ': d r''.„6"-S-1:;•`•!,-‘‘!'f4'r _ $ +#{R, i., i tttglt f : LtL f-j':` , �r .;44.: � � •o, i I V? I 1 j IV ._ • • i,,,,•,..;,,:=4:,,,,-,,,:,%,,,i,,..,,,;....,:iv t • • '„ it-,:y . ',3 r•L t t t L'0- ''fvVI - �x� r � �1• e I� ° 2 'll tit l��(r [ k•��9 II �{'t Wr .'.-ti., SSf t17 t ',t hey ' 1 { ' /hy r • i li. s• ..ti — ¢� iL ‘.-..4,,,.. c �'�, rLk1j )� .)i-'-.",., 'Lllljf.,y(1i - .,..„....,. t i • 4 #y (y • =t1p,,., , .e , . .,ii,,_ 11. -14, -4. , ., i...,..,, ._c. .,_2.,,,,.:,„ ... .: ._,...c, ,. ..,.,. . . .,., , " ,..,,,„,,?fti..,,,4.,.\.i„.: ,... .f. ,,,. .,„:;1.?. .1 :: k'1; ',' • "-' ,•-:-.- ,-,•• ,•:' ' • i 177 V, i'' 11 " 1 , �, ,Styr` 1 4 :Ff.(L £ ! } .V -q.' �,a�t PI' t�,I b< ' ' - 'f ',C r# f 'g ,f -r rr r ,j�=r 'ilk. y �' t dd� i I _.,..„.„,i"..., .,-:_-_,,,,..,..:�" 'i t .) 7.4,1 pit+ �{',P�T ,'r ti,t •ti,,'..'1 :..-:-.,:,•.,,,4 ���� � r i � 1 1 ,Jr�'' txr'�iJ 1 9i ,L! F. ...Ai. • p rr t¢r �_{3 14,44,,,,,1,,,,;,„,„,„.„ ',.., - _ li+' �� -,1,,•',;(.4:.? 11,.1 >E..44.04_ £1�,, )1' n <;.< ) ? y��PS4{ ��t t f,' I it"Pik;• 11r }-x > C1 !}.,yCf1_. • 1 ,, . {,{ 'rr 6 ..t,'-'..' 1 � �. / ', 'i'^..r,t1 x114. : . Jrt ...','•:,1741.„,;;-.4,4.,:7.A. s C }. ,4 , I l�` h 'y I f `4 + l+� ;1+ t y ..i:+0-• y yy ,h .Egyp tl - s tit k; • f ti i�1 ' I ' , i J -:fir � ��+��'.r. t • �,r t'r�t K�+v + s j Ij j' r! ✓�y.y ��{ h�' t 1.� ..' < lr nk'' I 1 ,:::,..r.k.:. . -.-,.°• L 7 ,,.�G' . c -t,..,,..-,...,-,4.0,,,,„v41;...!C - Lk L,;7:', I l 'r I ' !i„7:-......,-...,,,„.$,,s-r� [^ R,' - 61 : a y I r P ,y. ( +gf�i F..r`F',4 t 5' ' I fit. Q ..)� v, r e-ea"fi' �.`4 re- kid " 'F r l! - . P AV?, Q �` r ' i rt .i;:..'-:'i ;.�'V 9. - ,t I <L 7 kb t fi ' ti ,'k' i) } L t 4 k1 k ,i. ,� a� d• k 1.1v t 1 d t1 } f �1( - +IIdda �(" , '� ''t��, �����'G ' 1 � S'trrx`��'J "��`�� ���ihj. ,SN I � i�. � � '1'# ,�{ d 1 id r., jYf} \lei '!.'IEf t . �, -L �[`, , •`}, A-. I` Jilt r,r, 1p{ ! Y ,�`0 ka p — 1 4:> _ �': ' s a L : th } �t zi S3 — el • Iic j y+, ` h ;774..t' s. '4r`-. 1.J r a: i h ,ys'J�� i s k Ir 1 L1 a 7 .. yl i .' .;,•,--.g.,44 •,'i�� r'.. a ,, ."-•A.:W..41$*•'., : •.,(flsx+y ''t I; ', kya e ,.1 1 i - 1 +,k,�,,. ..� ti �`' ,,b � r k� k 1 %C :� 11 �n 4x 14 �'ke7ai' !� 1 l.; v 1 ,� k C - r _ .,� �..hA .. & , 4.- t 'a'* I I I s ���'. L•Int i i r', art C` ii.* e i't ' fig,c, ° • h -, �,a `4 yd # t� t �` � 11i�'a ,�S! � is ,g' 4'r4•,;" r-. 11 (( Vl . S 1��'a 'J �+. , f i a3� s � � T p a- di r k5aa t�ti L y: . ° cis f�, `� .X;714.01,14 `fit` 't{`'i : ti- �1:1- e . `t tm z 'i u' •,,,,,,,r .• • v. r q L" tfA ' K r 3Y�J A .� r. L ,g,,,,!„,irr _ a . $lam 0 }i- :,,,„:4,:',7I' lit!, ter ',' Iixi .. _. • ,e `G,1$ .,tri. t. ."�a��:sq'+ �-�- • #(�j ±ys ifl'.,-4, f t.1.0 i ti tt 'e y,;, c.px. 101-y�' ih i,S X4,,v-3,-...,,x„,,, a, . * E.4 • 1 i- p } , , F:l y 'Y SC �Y§'eY.Y L T '. '• i.. lxif A f E L l .a f T .x '"5 ' ,1 1. 5 .. l�yTI X {IL I1#' l4. 'q !•-�• Y x - 1 �V 1(l 1 1 t �zr1;`,.%;;!±,:;,';;,Y { � ° 9 ',Olt.j I h �� , } q, • 3 e � 1),1N L , 1 5�A • <r dF r a ` tsv �i : # 1S,, ap °; :.. I �46;*0> ;p Kv ; ; ¢5:1 1IIil, I: v t , s" i ter t`" 3,, r '� i I •t.;,;- i+i 1', jr _ ... 4 i n. ,r �' I' 1 A, ...4,C.,•-4(1- 1 R'. . - .,,,,,,,16. 1,-,,,,-,-,,,,,,-� #t Y' ' r� lt14 L li sz 1,.. jt.":' �`4 a _. -e' r� "F .ii F`„� r'va c I' 1 '� ]Al t..: i ^ . . a� > � f � • • i It . t ., !x,�^ df y,t tL��' y - h y zxy$9 i<t� y }„ `,,irJ" J L Al ''f'41 ' '3f \ 4 • ..:. 't� '},r�it�',�)r� r� a. ��'"y 1 �} ���..tt } �g]i >�I `,I :� 7,,k��c �. � �:'•.8} 3 1 -�'`a-r ' t4 74,-, ,..,,,t;;;;,;(3..7(<7.: G 4`.-i Y. • ,.'',113.1.11141.'"'1. ly rl . a i*Z.1 z' r '� � x.'x. , ,6„, 1-4,,, i,'� : ... ' ., t`r * ,.., .. . I 4f1 r I; --v_ � . �r' s d1` �.c�, y tvK i ' � i� s« x " rI � I I ��','� +• ,, ., I i. �' ' �r�,� ,+" '�tt,,+., i5r l a'' 3�" x ` }':�.'. - �,.f•-',-)C '�I' 11f{Iljf, + • 1 f5. ri r f • • sl + In F`JIr1 } �1 k tr C 'fly $ 'irtk , � ,11 irr : '4 r i I-.1..9111';:1'.'„-it Ij •' i t •-322 � , , Y t ,q "'%-744-+;- . Y I i c _ ��• • x'.`q 'F °t 1, 1Ig1 , r p om. 3rikK7.-.4-?,:EV.6 .,.5P'644441..'4-31tki...,-':•,.::::�1 ' - .I ,f"Vq k �{Ing�li . F -e-if,';'''," ,,�` t c 4 sr r r,;;� �} I -_-:.4:v-..: t.,.� tidi ifk�` - Q11-1111 �1{ .r #,2 - n s� • y` � ':111'...... t� {f `�L wj,r 11�5!1I�`,al' }i ''f F t i} rilliqr�y fii.i.>,tf...,...;:ev-A. -... ' ...,i 2-,.. "•,'- i,'. •,j,':''. ..-‘''',:,,::!I:';' lei gl; 1r3Ft' 'Is' ,,,� ;fit E- DI I1. ,�i('1141 ,z 1 ' 1 03, {u s t • 'y111.41'' t i 4 a- ` s s• .( ' ••••- Pt'�t 'C 5r, 1• ILg��'i ,.Z� , L 7 ''''''-`'''''!...11:;:c'.`:-'4 4L 1 �.3�` f�Y� :#. ,R!P_ '"s4� !}� !l'• I k 1] '. 1 • • •Itt*a. .' {mss 7;y : 31.�. y"s1 �x I i r+c5• 1 �ll, Ifp11';Ii4 � iL _ Y��r ?'• Y4 .. {s1� _4 11z. _ =5 i�" j, . r2b;.':':-i �;i: It 'il`'Ir -.i �r %' �X r.'.,:.max. 1'43,x t1. ? x� r. �t17�) Q�:c.'I it l I t} f( g i� 1 +1 its --.`c •s 1, ;� ! p$ t: T�. 1` ! , I l y rit t �I� ) x Wit,i1]) r ,�+,_ ."--°1;.:-'6,k..•, . �r- f 3�, Tc`X Qrt ,, �b ]r` I• ':�ti T .ri11 • •. Ryl, '�j* h .. t,-, - 1Al,:Jk� I �i; lid ) Y4C. -'vb 1 M`..)1,„3..y+. q i a wi,7,,,rpF41 �}yt i�1 r,..i, o,.,.5..„, .,„,...,r, re�'ye'7,Wi R {{ x }+`,},.,,.„,..,,4., ;,,,‘•f y ? t 1. w t i to s .,••4,..,..,T,:.1,,,..._.e+, . I. t 9, I L {r• ( t',. ! ••,-,:t. b - ,, 11- b i r 7V. ,1111 1 } .. C,.;,,ig,-,:r„4,-,,-,. 1]I p' . I E., • w e. k"f4''.�` a As-')i ,�•,. � ! �iLl I i� �' �] 1 �.�V - t pQ. 8 r ,• cu 1�.1,_, iS _', ' >Z''.yt�ir N t L A'�"fP - "z k �'. d� <, 1 ��'' L 1♦q 1 7 2 .w - -S ,...ili', ti.': ..,,o, t �+ayq.*; ; : }•-,1. .z, • •,,,,',c-:.•€!.w�� pi e I ri 1C.^.. Ar4 . uu 1`., +,bC � i p � .-i-.,-.•11✓1.�1�� 1yx• rill tc.„, ,:,'.,,,,-'474,,,t4,2 ,'k 4\y'A�1 1< ti '. RI t '* rfi �` 11 it a �k3 L°. � 1 v '. 6 t aT;;" £x ; �^-...; ?t*br..P)}. is� #''" 1 "1�,"'' - R ,.(IE 1' 4 0 -.?,:k.,.. i .,4 "� 1 t :. 1 �• r f• ar I 4 r } Is a, 4f� ''e,;,24, • .h$ 1 I*1 ti I t � ru �` � t S tt{xt' #+-1`. '._�• '' ,"a-�'•d- w .�X.�,L L' L.+�r .t'.�: at ,.....10:.i..44.41--�-; '� ' G Minnesota Using the Power of History to Transform Lives Historical Society PRESERVING SHARING CONNECTING February 12, 2016 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: Bridge No.90646,(Wooddale Avenue Bridge)Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek, Edina, Hennepin County Dear Mayor Hovland: I am pleased and honored to congratulate you upon the entry of Bridge No.90646 in the National Register of Historic Places, The National Register, as you know, is a listing of districts,sites, buildings,structures, and objects considered to be worthy of preservation. An information sheet describing the program is enclosed. The property was listed on February 2, 2016. • By recognizing the significance of your property and planning for its preservation you are participating in a national movement which aims to preserve,for the benefit of future generations, our cultural heritage. If you have any questions,feel free to contact Denis Gardner, National Register Historian, at 651-259-3451, denis.gardner@mnhs.org or 345 Kellogg Blvd. W.,St. Paul, MN 55102. Again, congratulations on receiving this important designation. Sincerely, 00 11 • . it , Barbara Mitchell Howard Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Enclosures: National Register Program cc: Mr. Ryan Weber, Chair, Edina Heritage Preservation Board,4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 Hennepin County Board of Commissioners,A2400 Government Center, 300 S. 6th St., Minneapolis, MN 55404 President, Hennepin History Museum, 2303 Third Ave. So., Minneapolis, MN 55404 President, Edina Historical Society, 4711 W.70th St., Edina, MN 55431 Ms. Kelli Andre Kellerhall,The 106 Group, 1295 Bandana Blvd. N.#335,St. Paul, MN 55108 Mr.Greg Mathis, MnDOT,395 John Ireland Blvd., Mail Stop 620,St. Paul, MN 55155 Minnesota Historical Society,345 Kellogg Boulevard West,Saint Paul,Minnesota 55102 651-259-3000•888-727-8386•www.mnhs.org i�4 e yt111 'c-' � J}1 f 1vl O1 Wooddale Avenue Bridge Historic Preservation Plan of Treatment December 15, 2015 Dear Edina Heritage Preservation Board: The City of Edina's Engineering Department is responsible for the planning, design, and construction of the City's infrastructure. The infrastructure supports the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Our responsibility is to ensure projects meet design standards and engineerings requirements. Due to the unique, historic nature of the Wooddale Avenue Bridge, we also understand that this specific piece of infrastructure will require a special plan of treatment whenever maintenance is required. This plan of treatment is adopted from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties. It will be the authoritative guide for design review decisions involving properties designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks such as the Wooddale Avenue Bridge. 1 have reviewed the plan of treatment and agree with the provisions for protecting this historic structure. Sincerely, z4-(94. 2914 Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard.Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov.952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 A ...3 UMC NO.'IUG4-UU'Itl MVO total 7U-yUU United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Histi 1C Puc-e Registration Form isterBulletin,Ho,vtaCmnp(ete • not i 1 to the property beingm dons in Nati al Re N/A"for"ant applicable."ow to Complete For This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in Nano g the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does apply functions,architectural classification,materials,and areas of significance,enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Pro I erty Historic name: Bridge No. 90646 Other names/site number: Wooddale Avenue Bridle Name of related multiple listing: • "Iron&Steel Bridges in MN, 1873-1945" (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) • 2. Location Street&number: Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek; 5000 block of Wooddale Avenue City or town: Edina State: MN County: Henne in Not for publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A • 3.State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act,as amended, ereb certify that this —nominationrequest for determination of eligibility meets meets the the d cemeat and Ihy National Historic standards for registering properties oirth in 36CFRPart 60glster of professional requirements setf inion,the property—meets____does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this In my o p property be considered significant at the following levels)of significance: statewide local _national — — Applicable National Register Criteria: A Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Gover meat In my opinion,the property meets—does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Title: Government A- 4 Sections 1-6 page 1 United States Department of the interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Name of Property Hennepin, Minnesota County and State 4. National Park Certification I, hereby, certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register • determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other(explain:) Signature of the Keeper Date of Action 5. Classification • Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as a ply) Private Public-Local I X I Public- State • Public-Federal I I Category of Property (Check only one box) Building(s) I District I I Site I I Structure I X I • • • Sections 1-6 page'2 • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 018 Hennepin, Minnesota Bridge No. 90646 County and State Name of Property Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing • buildings sites 1 structures objects • 1 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register N/A 6.Function or Use • Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) • TRANSPORTATION/road-related(vehicular) • • Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) TRANSPORTATION/road-related(vehicular) • Sections 1-6 page 3 • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State 7.Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) OTHER: Multi Plate arch • Materials: (Enter categories from instructions.) Principal exterior materials of the property: METAL: Steel STONE: Limestone CONCRETE OTHER Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable.Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location,type, style,method of construction, setting, size,and significant features.Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) Summary Paragraph The Wooddale Avenue Bridge, identified as National Bridge Inventory Number 90646, is a single-span,Multi Plate arch bridge that is faced with Platteville limestone. The bridge has a structure length of 21.0 feet, a span Iength of 18.0 feet,and an out-and-out width of 40.4.feet. The bridge was constructed by the Works Progress Administration(WPA) in 1937 and carries Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in Edina,Hennepin County, Minnesota. Narrative Description Bridge No. 90646 is a single-span,Multi Plate arch bridge that carries Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek in Edina,Hennepin County,Minnesota. The bridge is located in the northeast part of Edina,230 feet south of the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and West 50th Street, and a half-mile east of Trunk Highway 100. The Edina County Club golf course is located directly west of the bridge and St. Stephens Episcopal Church is located directly east of the bridge. The bridge is oriented in a north-south alignment over Minnehaha Creek. At this location the creek is narrow and rocky, and has sloped banks which are covered with dense growth of small trees and shrubs. The bridge has a structure length of 21.0 feet, a span length of 18.0 feet, and an out-and-out width of 40.4 feet. • Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I National Register of Historic Places RegistNor tion102Form -0018 NPS Form 10-900 OMB Hennepin Minnesota Bride No. 90646 county Name of Property and State The superstructure of Bridge No. 90646 consists of abutmentsel o the north and are constructed south ends of edge,which ch anchor the structure into the sloped banks of Minnehaha Cre ro ect slightly reinforced- concrete with Platteville limestone facing. Engaged pilasters, on the bridge areville limestone,e constructed of reinforced-concrete from the abutments. The non-load bearing closedpar and are faced with Platteville limestone. The rock-faced,co course d lim so onthe e hasarcrakedhe m rt r joints increase in . The voussoir stones are rectangular-shaped and are applied perp lar arch height closer to the center of the arch where an elongated keystone lateskwhich are bs the lotted together.The l The plates of and barrel are constructed of Armco Multi Plate corrugated pof the the arch have corrugations 6.0 inches wide and 1.5 inches deep. e p The t limestonearch tcarries rrees theng loadalextend an. An and insulated sewer pipe runs longitudinally through the arch downstream from the imposts. o The bridge's spandrel walls extend above the deck to form theilia arched and ang. The d pilastersoppd is a hin extend above li the deck forming the railing end posts. The solid railings are slightlystone limestone cap that overhangs the width of the railings.Thecap features the cap.Beyond the e lim Beare short pieces interspersed through the cap that slightly rise above the height sections of railing that extend along the approach spans. At both ends of the west railing, only the base of these roadwa as a extensions remains. The deck is 40.4 feet wide and carries t t the bite you us wearing surface applied over earth fill. A concrete sidewalk extends along the east plaque inscribed with"WPA 1937"is located on the inside of the south end of the eastern railing. Integrityremained in its original location, carrying Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek.The setting is Y Since its construction in 1937,Bridge No. 90646 a as el unchanged,as much of the area was developed before ex rity and simultaneously with the bridge.As such,Bridge No. 9064 re t ucins ncellen,with t nt rep y of floc ion and • setting. The bridge has remained relatively unaltered since itsbituminous wearing surface;a feature that is designed to be replaced, , and dtthe oss of t e u uppere Porti ens ofts e railing exextensions on the western railing being the only notablechanges some minor deterioration,including rusting of the bolt connectionson the steel arc,this has notpalling expansioncl the of the Platteville limestone, and deterioration of portions of the parapet original design of the bridge or its character-defining features. As such,the bridge retains excellent integrity of design, materials,workmanship,feeling, and association. Section 7 page 5 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Name of Property Hennepin, Minnesota County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x"in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing.) IAA. Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. II B. Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in ourP ast. IX I C. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type,period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. I I D. Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "x"in all the boxes that apply) II A. Owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. II B. Removed from its original location. IJ C. A birthplace or grave. Ii D. A cemetery. • • II E. A reconstructed building, object, or structure. II F. A commemorative property. G. Less than 50 years old or achieving significance within the past 50 years. • • Section 8 page 6 • United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places RegOMBVor 024-0018 • Form NPS Form 10-900 •� Hennepin, Minnesota Bride No. 90646 County and State Name of Property Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) POLITICS/GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING Period of Significance 1937 Significant Dates - 1937 Significant Person (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above) N/A Cultural Affiliation N/N/ Architect/Builder Fabricator: Lyle Pi.e&Culvert Co. • Builder: Works Prot ess Administration • Desi: er: Duckett,W. E. Section 8 page 7 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Name of Property Hennepin Minnesota County and State Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (Provide a summary paragraph that includes level of significance, applicable criteria,justification for the period of significance, and any applicable criteria considerations.) Bridge No. 90646 is locally significant under National Register of Historic Places(NRNP) Criterion A in the area of Politics and Govermnent, and under Criterion C in the area of Engineering,within the historical context "Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota, 1873-1945."The bridge is a rare surviving and an outstanding example of a single-span,Multi Plate arch bridge with masonry facing that was constructed by the Works Progress Administration(WPA).As such,Bridge No. 90646 is significant under NRHP Criterion A, public works for bridges,for its exemplification of the types of labor-intensive public works projects undertaken by the WPA during the Great Depression in order to provide work for the unemployed. Bridge No. 90646 is also significant under NRHP Criterion C for its modular, corrugated-metal, Multi Plate arch design, e engineering achievement; and for its outstanding Rustic Style aesthetics, a style tht wase ons de h is a ed a hallmark of WPA construction. The bridge is also an unusual example of a WPA Rustic Style bridge constructed with Platteville Iimestone. The bridge's period of significance is 1937,which corresponds with the year it was constructed, as well as the year it was associated with the work of the WPA. Narrative Statement of Significance(Provide at least one paragraph for each area of significance.) Owned by the City of Edina and constructed in 1937, Bridge No. 90646 is located in the northeast part of Edina, on land that was originally part of a 120-acre farm owned by George W.Baird, a prominent local farmer in the late nineteenth century.' Beginning in the 1920s, much of the Baird farmstead was sold for development, including the area along Wooddale Avenue that surrounds the location of present-day Bridge No. 90646. In 1922,the Edina Country Club subdivision was platted just north of the present-day bridge, on the north side of 50th Street. The Edina Country Club golf course,located immediately adjacent to the west of the bridge,opened in 1923. The area to the east and south of the bridge site also began to be developed around this time. This development resulted in a growing population and a corresponding increase in automobile and truck traffic. By the mid-1930s,the steel beam bridge that originally carried Wooddale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek was "no longer wide enough to handle the heavy truck and auto traffic that has been on the increase yearly."2 Therefore, in 1937,the City of Edina decided to replace the bridge. On March 8, 1937,the Edina City Council reviewed proposals for the construction of a new bridge over Minnehaha Creek at Wooddale Avenue. According to the meeting minutes: ... four different kinds of constructions have been estimated,namely,reinforced concrete,piling with I beams, cresoted wood culverts and inverted multi plate steel arch on concrete base with rubble or boulder stone facings. After discussion it was moved by Willson, that the proposition of the Lyle Culvert &Pipe Company dated March 6, 1937,be accepted and the Recorder be authorized sign[sic] the necessary order insuring present low pric [sic], seconded by Holten and carried.3 1 Robert Vogel,"Wooddale Bridge—Finding of Significance,"available at the Edina Heritage Preservation Board,Edina,Minnesota. 2"New Bridge Like This Will Span`Naha Creek,"The Crier,May 1937, 1,available at the City of Edina,Edina,Minnesota. 3 Village of Edina,"Minutes of the regular meeting of the Council of the Village of Edina,held in Edina School Building on March 8, 1937 at 8 PM,"Edina City Council,available at the City of Edina,Edina,Minnesota. Section 9-end page 8 United States Department of the Interior • National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State The proposal by the Lyle Culvert&Pipe Company was for an Armco Multi Plate arch bridge, consisting of "5%- 3 Gauge Plates 40'-4"long—including all necessary bolts and nuts,"for a total cost of materials, including freight, of$1,008.00.4 The proposal also included a Rustic Style boulder stone facing, which was a common aesthetic treatment for Multi Plate arch spans during this period. The bridge replacement project was partly funded by the federal government through one of the New Deal federal relief programs. The funds were administered by the Department of the Interior and passed through the Minnesota Department of Highways to the Hennepin County Highway Agency.s Hennepin County,along with the City of Edina,jointly paid for the construction of the bridge, which cost approximately$3,500.6 A local unit of the WPA was employed to construct the bridge. Construction of Bridge No. 90646 began in late May 1937. Edina's The Crier chronicled the construction of the bridge,writing that:"workmen began foundation excavations late in May for the new stone arch bridge at Wooddale avenue [sic] over Minnehaha creek,recently authorized by the village council."7 Work on the bridge progressed rapidly until July 1937,when it was reported that an aspect of the bridge's design had changed to complement development surrounding the bridge. The article states: in order that the stone facing of the new Wooddale avenue [sic] bridge over Minnehaha creek [sic] may harmonize with the new edifice of St. Stephen's Episcopal church soon to be built nearby, specifications for the stone have been changed from boulder stone to limestone,Village Recorder Ben B. Moore told the CRIER.8 The original drawings for Bridge No. 90646 from April 13, 1937,depict a Rustic Style, single-span, steel Multi Plate arch bridge clad in irregular-coursed boulder stone with an open stone and timber railing.The plans note that the designer was W.E.Duckett.9 Duckett was a local civil engineer who was employed by Hennepin County as a highway engineer'from 1928 to 1938.1°The determination to change the stone of Bridge No. 90646 to Platteville limestone was an intentional decision to unify the bridge with the design aesthetic of the limestone veneer on the then under-construction St. Stephen's Episcopal Church(completed 1938),which is located directly east of the bridge. The decision to use Platteville limestone does not appear to have affected the construction schedule of the bridge. The Crier reported in August 1937 that the work on the bridge was largely complete, and in September, a photograph of the newly completed bridge graced the cover of the newsletter. Multi Plate Arch Bridges Bridge No. 90646 is a Multi Plate arch bridge. Introduced in 1931 by the Armco Culvert Manufacturer's Association,Multi Plate arch bridges are comprised of galvanized, corrugated,heavy-gauge steel plates that are manufactured in curved segments,which are bolted together in the field to create an arch or circle.'1 According to Lyle Culvert&Pipe Co.,Bridge No. 90646 was constructed with"plates [that have] corrugations 6 inches in 4 Lyle Culvert&Pipe Co.,"Prospective Multi Plate Bridge,"on file at the City of Edina Public Works,Edina,Minnesota. 5 Vogel,"Wooddale Bridge—Finding of Significance," 6"Workmen Start Bridge Project,"The Crier, June 1937, 12,available at the City of Edina,Edina,Minnesota. Ibid. 8"Limestone Face For New Bridge,"The Crier,July 1937,5,available at the City of Edina,Edina,Minnesota, 9"Bridge No 281 Village of Edina,Woodale Avenue&Minnehaha Creek,"April 13, 1973,on file at the City of Edina Public Works, Edina,Minnesota.• 1°Vogel,"Wooddale Bridge—Finding of Significance." 11 Lyle Culvert&Pipe Co.,"Prospective Multi Plate Bridge." Section 9-end page 9 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form . NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State width and 11/2 inches deep.These giant corrugations take advantage of the tremendous strength of the arch principle and combined with thick plates,makes [sic] a tough and enormously strong bridge."12 Multi Plate arches are typically anchored to concrete abutments with concrete or stone wing walls at each end.13 Multi Plate arch bridges were popular during the 1930s as"a viable alternative to reinforced-concrete slab-and- girder construction for short-span bridges."14 Additionally their modular design was, "more economical than either cast iron pipe or reinforced concrete pipe for small waterways."15 The prefabrication of the Multi Plate arch made these types of spans popular with New Deal agencies,as the arch was easy to assemble by unskilled c were almost exclusivelyconstructed between 1933 and laborers. Reflectingthis fact,Multi Plate arch bridges 1942 by New Deal federal relief programs, like the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the WPA. The simplicity of the design made the Multi Plate arch compatible with using local materials (for non-arch elements) and labor. "Armco shrewdly emphasized these points in its advertising: `Multi Plate Arches ... Designed to fit any local conditions-- Can use local labor on Work Relief Projects. Use of stone end-walls not only makes attractive structure,but employs local material and labor."16 When stone is used for the spandrel walls on Multi Plate arch bridges, as is the case with Bridge No. 90646,the bridge takes on the appearance of a stone-arch bridge.17 The use of stone masonry in conjunction with the Multi Plate arch also reflected"the New Deal agenda of promoting highway beautification,local craft skills, and labor-intensive public works projects."18 "Instead of eliminating labor costs as in traditional building economics, [the use of stone masonry] was an explicit attempt to make construction projects labor-intensive, thus creating more work."19 Bridge No. 90646 embodies the WPA philosophy of providing employment through unskilled,but labor-intensive work,as the bridge features an easy-to-construct Multi Plate arch paired with labor-intensive Platteville limestone spandrel walls. As noted, Multi Plate arch bridges were an economical choice compared to other types of short-length spans. The plates used in the arch construction were shipped in a nesting position,which reduced freight costs. The ease of construction and the use of local materials for non-arch elements, such as the headwalls, also kept construction costs reasonable.Thus from a materials cost perspective,the economic benefits of the Multi Plate arches solidified its popularity with Federal-Relief programs. Multi Plate arch bridges were constructed throughout Minnesota during the Great Depression; however,they have become an increasingly scarce property type in the state. In 1988,there were 35 surviving Multi Plate arch bridges from the New Deal period in Minnesota.20 Based on a statewide bridge survey completed in 2014,there are approximately eight Multi Plate arch bridges from the New Deal period extant in Minnesota; however,not all of these bridges were constructed as Federal Relief projects.21 Bridge No. 90646 is the only one of those eight surviving bridges that is located in 12 Lyle Culvert&Pipe Co.,"Prospective Multi Plate Bridge." 13 Fredric L.Quivik and Dale L.Martin,"Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota,"July 1988,National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form,F-10. 14Ibid,F-10. • 19 Ibid,E-19. 16 Ibid,E-20. 17 Ibid,F-10. 18 Ibid,F-10. 19 Robert Frame,"Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota," 1989,National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form,E-15. 20 Quivik and Martin,"Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota,"E-20. 21 Mead&Hunt,and Olson&Nesvold Engineers,"Phase I Results:Minnesota Local Historic Bridge Study,"Minnesota Department of Transportation,St.Paul,November 2012,Appendix B. Section 9-end page 10 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places RegistrationNo102Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB Hennepin, Minnesota Brld�e No. 90646 County and State Name of Property Hennepin County and is one of the few still extant that represent Federal Relief, and specifically WPA, construction.22 Works Progress Administration During the New Deal era, several federal programs wererdthe WPA, work for the unemployed.The Works Progress Administration,renamed the Work Projects Administration in function of the 1939,was established in 1935 by President Franklin D. designed to provide employment forneedy employable A was to "Operate a nation-wide program of small usefulprojects workers."23 Secondly,"it was responsible for coordinating the various activities of the `Works Program' as a whole."24 Under the direction of Harry L.Hopkins,the WPA operated from 1935 to 1943 and employed millions in a nationwide effort to offer employment to the unemployed by channeling federal funds The WPA o a wide range of public works projects,including construction of bla buildings, oaums,airports post offices,parks.playgrounds, was also responsible for the construction of swimming pools, park buildings and other such public facilities nationwide.25 oconstruction methodss undertaken bytDuring its existence intended in to be labor-intensive and utilized locally available materials and Minnesota,the WPA employed 65,713 people.26 the Bridge design and construction in Minnesota during the New Deaoperiodn was largely elythe influenced by trea2m nt . of The WPA did not usually create new engineering methods, but itbridges it funded,requiring that they incorporate Rustic, Classical Revival, or Art Deco style elements. During es that were the WPA'S existence, over 78,000 bridges were built nationally,includingexample some lof Multi arch bridgeer • built or improved in Minnesota. Bridge No.90646 is a preserved that exemplifies the types of bridge projects undertaken by the WPA.The bridge manifests the ideals and goals of the WPA program, as it was a labor-intensive project that utilized in Edinaandlaborers the only New Deal Multi bridge represents the impact of New Deal public works programs arch bridge extant in Hennepin County.29 Rustic Styletic Style design aesthetic With its Platteville limestone walls,Bridge No. 90646 exemplifiesthe Rus developed by the National Park popularized by the WPA. The Rustic Style is a style of architecture that w previously Service(NPS).Rustic Style buildings and structures were designed Rustic Style are that they were builtwith whatever The hallmark of buildings and structures constructed in ods and often had ahand-crafted materials were available locally,utilized labor intensive building me , appearance.30 31 "The National Park Service and the U.S.Forest Service considered rustic architecture the 22 Mead&Hunt,and Olson&Nesvold Engineers,"Phase I Results:Minnesota Local Historic Bridge Study,"(Minnesota Department of Transportation,St.Paul,November 2012),Appendix B. 23 Rolf T.Anderson,"Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota, 1933-1941," 1993,National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form,E-48. 24 Ibid. 25 Anderson,"Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota,"E-48. 26 Iric Nathanson,"The WPA in Minnesota:Economic Stimulus during e Great Depression,"MINNPOST, Januarye7,2009,accessed Jauary 31,2014,http://www.minnpost.comlpolitics-policy/2009/01/ a-minnesota-economic-stimulus-during-gr p 27 Frame,"Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota,"F-6. 28 Ibid.,E-15. 29 Vogel,"Wooddale Bridge—Finding of Significance." 3o Anderson,"Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota,"E-24 31"Rustic Style Resources in Minnesota State Parks,"Minnesota Historical Society,accessed March 28,2014, http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/stateparks. Section 9-end page 11 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form • NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Name of Property Hennepin, Minnesota County and State appropriate style for construction in state and national parks and forests"and thus most of the buildings and structures erected by the WPA are Rustic Style in design.32 As such,Rustic Style resources "are the legacy of the Depression-era work groups, whose efforts helped preserve vast areas of wilderness and created remarkable building and structures ... throughout the United States."33 Bridge No. 90646 was originally designed to have boulder stone spandrel walls; the use of boulder stone was a common iteration of the Rustic Style in Minnesota. When the bridge was constructed,the boulder stone was deliberately changed to Platteville limestone to harmonize with the design of the nearby St. Stephen's Episcopal Church. This change is in keeping with the design principles of the Rustic Style, as Platteville limestone is a locally available material and the use of it emphasizes the bridge's relationship with its surrounding environment. The registration requirements for Multi Plate arch bridges within the"Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota Multiple Property Documentation Form (MPDF),"state that Multi Plate arch bridges can be eligible for the NRHP if their modular corrugated-metal construction and stone headwalls and spandrels, which are the most notable features of such bridges, are clearly visible and relatively unaltered.34 Additionally,the requirements state that since Multi Plate arch bridges were most prominently associated with the"New Deal's encouragement of roadside beautification,the bridge's workmanship and design should be on the original site,harmonious with the general setting, of high aesthetic quality, and of New deal vintage.i35 Bridge No.90646 remains in its original location,retains its modular corrugated metal construction, and its stone headwalls and spandrels walls. The bridge is an outstanding example of a modular corrugated-metal Multi Plate arch bridge designed by the WPA in Edina,and embodies the aesthetics and workmanship of the Rustic Style, which was popular of WPA construction in Minnesota. 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography(Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form.) Anderson,Rolf T. "Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota, 1933-1941."August 1993.National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. Frame, Robert. "Reinforced-Concrete Highway Bridges in Minnesota." September 1989. National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office,Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota. "Limestone Face For New Bridge."The Crier,July 1937. On file at the Edina Historical Society,Edina, Minnesota. Mead&Hunt and Olson&Nesvold Engineers,P.S.C. "Phase I Results: Minnesota Local Historic Bridge Study."Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2012. 32 Anderson,"Federal Relief Construction in Minnesota,"1993,E-24. 33"Rustic Style Resources in Minnesota State Parks." 34 Quivik and Martin,"Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota,"F-11. 3s Ibid. Section 9-end page 12 United States Department of the Interior Form • National Park Service 7 National Register of Historic Places OReegNoration Oo18 NPS Form 10-900 Hennepin, Minnesota Bride No. 90646 County and State Name of Property Nathanson, Inc.i "The WPA in Minnesota: Economic Stimulus during the Great Depression." MINNPOST, January 7, 2009. Accessed January 31, 2014. http://wwwurinnpost.co Dtics-policy/2009/01/wpa- minnesota-economic-stimulus-durin_-•'eat-de•ression. "New 40-Foot Bridge Over Minnehaha Creek." The Crier, September 1937. On file at the Edina Historical Society,Edina,Minnesota. "New Bridge Like This Will Span`Haha Creek." The Crier, May 1937. On file at the Edina Historical Society, Edina,Minnesota. Quivik,Fredric L.,:and Dale L. Martin."Iron and Steel Bridges in Minnesota."fileat he July 1988.a National tate anaHisl Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form. On Preservation Office,Minnesota Historical Society, St.Paul,Minnesota. "Rustic Style Resources in Minnesota State Parks."Minnesota Historical Society.Accessed March 28,2014. http://www.mnhs.org/places/nationalregister/stateparks. Vogel,Robert. "Wooddale Bridge—Finding of Significance." On file at the Edina Heritage Preservation Board, g Edina,Minnesota. • "Workmen Start Bridge. Project." The Crier, June 1937. On file at the Edina Historical Society, Edina, Minnesota. • Section 9-end page 13 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Name of Property Hennepin, Minnesota County and State Previous documentation on file(NPS): preliminary determination of individual listing(36 CFR 67)has been requested previously listed in the National Register previously determined eligible by the National Register designated a National Historic Landmark recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey# recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # recorded by Historic American Landscape Survey # Primary location of additional data: X State Historic Preservation Office Other State agency Federal agency Local government University X Other Name of repository: City of Edina Heritage Preservation Commission City of Edina Public Works Department Historic Resources Survey Number(if assigned):HE-EDC-633 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property 0.02 Use either the UTM system or latitude/longitude coordinates Latitude/Longitude Coordinates Datum if other than WGS84: (enter coordinates to 6 decimal places) 1. Latitude: Longitude: 2. Latitude: Longitude: 3. Latitude: Longitude: 4. Latitude: Longitude: Section 9-end page 14 • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service/National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.1024-0018 Bridge No. 90646 Hennepin, Minnesota Name of Property County and State Or UTM References Datum(indicated on USGS map): NAD 1927 or X NAD 1983 • 1. Zone: 15N Basting: 473228.9 Northing: 4973204.7 2. Zone: Basting: Northing: 3. Zone: Basting: Northing: 4. Zone: Basting: Northing: Verbal Boundary Description(describe the boundaries of the property) The nominated property consists of a rectangle measuring 21.0 feet long by 40.4 feet wide with a center axis - that coincides with the centerline of the bridge,whose corners encompass the edges of the bridge's abutments and with a perimeter that encompasses the entire bridge. Boundary Justification(explain why the boundaries were selected) The boundary encompasses the total bridge superstructure,total substructure, and all other integral abutment and approach elements. 11.Form Prepared By name/title:Kelli Andre Kellerhals,Historian,and Gregory R.Mathis,Sr.Preservation Planner organization: The 106 Group Ltd. street&number: 370 Selby Avenue South city or town:St.Paul State: MN zip code: 55102 email: kandrekellerhals cr,l06group.com telephone: (651)290-0977 date: May 2,2014 Section 9-end page 15 — _________ ... _I .+ t ...±, cc Z w, NO I,- JII zI � % s--/CHRISTIAN11 SCHOOL e , o. —_- f/ I'� ( 411EBEP.FIELD 1 i I( I I I W42NDST I I 1 w ¢ ¢ ¢ w 0 ��OL�C�] o z LT, l W W o,LITTELIST 6 0 ¢ U m' I.-_.I >"' LMORNINGSIDE RD1 EDN MORNING$1D z SON ST CUU• . o • -t BRPN,0 w st -yam jWgg1N1 �% W O O Y > > w o o W y y y1:"-''' > o . gg1S1 ets,' M �V� . - --- - wNd c R. ?) '- 1.11 - t> 1 I o o �1 45TH ST o 00 ¢ o K JETIN�-- �S�O�C W ` 1 Q} cC m U ��TODD �l llr,�©Ft'� C: I w ARK Sv) `-p PARK BROOKSIDE7 &� r LL II_ RD -y -� n _ _ pW44TH ST - (?DQE �t< II ' z - (MOTOR___/- ST ��NN l m ST_-'iu P. �i o TOT�NES a I [ o" --•Q MOORE: , o CiR �z �� ' , I in t`x LAURA ?1 --_ BROWN DALE l cL p :: o ti PA G��J�1 ': ;mumu� 47TH - DIVISION ST i -���m �QO�� f.,�' / ��' j�j � BioValOTE - vS" , \ \ GJL ! ¢ r OAKSRD LLJY Q / i - o w w 8o o BRIDGE � l ¢ I p14 �' I I z ¢ 1 w rn i z LN ©�G � p w w �i. A G '5,„ ¢ w o w w > �P00KLA oo w 8 o m ¢� o ;o W48THST W LLQ - o Y� 48TH ¢� 'f �C�E�' �[�©C9•'_' o op ¢ j m _ XX Q ¢ ff w < `'' o,I P� 1 o 1 d m o w w w > a Y 48TH Y w WOODHti� w �� QO m o o a ¢ 8 - z { HOLLYWOOD RD MILLPPOND1o o \' .o I Lu� 1 0 I'.BLVD w w z w Iz �I' , dcd = 1 U6 RD W 49TH Si --<. -I 7 SOS COUNTRY Cl ( -W-49-i/2Ti- ST 49TH ' Q ° I WOODDALE" 11 N� ,:'` w a �0 SF PARK I EDINA C ®f4�C��zu RHONAVE I, oQ - 3 N up W 50TH ST WILLIAMS S! S I CPI I�d'5 a > > tiiGUS �( O HILLTOP LA PARK UTLEY L > Q5°714 ii ¢ ¢ Et IC CPA �YOL�NGLA w t:; w PARK u' ¢EDINA x FP NCE, IL. '�> a o t�CL �i9_Vll r'd ¢ a , /� -_-W HgT 1,: �. _ --_� LA COVE,AN I�. - ¢ Q a Y !NIOODDALE y w ¢ = w o qHA CREED I _ `� ¢ 5 _J LL9 EDINA _= fSjSr 0 0 ¢ FRANK CITY HALL& I BRUCE PL m�l w .LU w u_ m = Y < i`I I TUPA (..,J POLICE DEPARTMENT I � Q• , > > 0 0 1 PARK �:. X000 ¢ o a 52ND�' m v� ��0A(E z ¢ oI EN z 1 - EDIN �p C 3�0 u U \ 52ND �' �! W 52ND ST ') a, CAW;. aY SENT R CENTER �� �� \\a •-__-•cHR.IsI a 53RD '.fGBANAjIt °PU LIC LIBRARY�, �I� EDINA �� ��� �� REFOP- -D }, SQUAR OUP. F fI COUNTRY w II A Hur< ‹ w ESHER 0 P LADY OF o L+' ¢ 53RD ST >� <, .IPARK I GRACE �I -, C�Ug w ARDCh Q CALVIN SCHOOL " o C�G�ID69 Q ¢ CHRISTIAN , PINEWOOD ? o PARK < •Z x TR 0 CHUAND RCH I o I PJr7G G� 'z`�' < SCHOOL pST PETER'E � EDE OR ST/ RICHMOND DR �I©© 1 / E IIV W 54TH Si I+I'( " ._ =I -) 0, CHURCH AD Il �� v GOLFT RRACE II COMMUNII'1' �/� R70HWo0DD¢ r - — MOM 9��7 G� 1 ,�LUTIIERAN J WINDSOR AVE • 2 I t9lfFFl w w refs x i�WINDSORAVE �. �� w <_ F�0 u�� LAKEVIEW 4-j: CUt CH LL PQPGQ KENT AVE I ¢ m of =�W 55TH ¢ = I pW 55TH ST k-�P� a �-- \In z OAK DR ST .. ----L----)- o -i' +�!' �Po � o o • o �- w �, d 1 itaat C).- W 56TH ST z o p LEXINGTON J > w i o� D z o MELODY I �l o o Y o Q it I w o LAKE PARK 3 > Io > / m ¢I yop. Q u YVONNE TER WIND'w I� ¢ W 56TH ST - u - _ ;56TH SIL; o p; G' ADATH YESHL �y / RD oo WOODDAL� --p --hz r/..49i7,, �p f' =0 CEMETF I o f'.I 7 I o a w CHURCH I Q �I I Q. 57TH ST _! `\-'i=1 I it CT u I L z TOWER ST KELLOGG PL p ,_ 11Q17f u'IMEVp -4 15,4 K vP > WOODLAND aR W o , , ¢ r I SOUTHVIEW LA 1 S WOOO W 57TH ST UG w 2 ' \ p - EDINA WOODQ p D DR pp 8, m NELODI' ti �COMMUNITY h� ( \ ` /�0 11 ii 0 GROVE ST LA CE PARO I �J� c '=f�� CREST OR Op t __ _1 �� CENTER A-5 Q.. 4,0,,,,_ , ii I �,NORMANDALE ¢j� 8, kl, 9ELEMENTARY I PHILBROOK LAS— S l' ' 10 58TH ST f ,, Si)I ITH VIEW W 58TH ST II I II I W 58TH ST , . , i , . . ,, 6•tiefect . • .. , . , ,... , 0, ...z. .. . .....:....:...„.. , ,, , „.. ..:,..!...„_, ..., , . ,, ,. .... . .,.,. ..., „ .. , _ . . . ,, . . . , ,, . . ... ,..,„ .,.. , ,. , ,.1.1„.41i1.„,...„.,..„:„. ,. ,, ., ..‘,,, . . r, i :_ii ,,.. '. ,•ii.- .'-..-- {• y t° �' �Sy t7;x1x • ri .",- tOt- • { l ` 4. k �' nm novnnc `1 • f . '€ s U ». .r $itj n n • • rn 4 " 2. J ___ 1 .,kBridge 90646 Hennepin County ♦ Minnesota . 4 0 �^"/ 1 inch =• 50 feet Source iEsrt,rDigitalGlob_`�rGeoEyel;, b d1,IyJSDA;,`UrSGS AEX;, Getnmappingl'N g.-_71 lGNt,(IGP- lswisstop anoftheaGlSjUs-Fommunity' A - s Edina, MN Code of Ordinances Page 1 of 3 ARTICLE IX. - EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARKS Sec. 36-713. - Purpose. The zoning classification of Edina Heritage Landmark is established to promote the preservation, protection and use of significant heritage resources in the city. Heritage landmarks shall be nominated by the heritage preservation board and designated by council resolution. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(1)) Sec. 36-714. - Eligibility criteria. The following criteria will guide the heritage preservation board and the council in evaluating potential heritage landmark designations: (1) The quality of significance in history, architecture, archeology and culture present in buildings, sites, structures, objects and districts that reflects: a. Association with important events or patterns of events that reflect significant broad patterns in local history; b. Association with the lives of historically significant persons or groups significant; c. Embodiment of the distinctive characteristics of an architectural style, design, period,type or method of construction; or that possess high artistic values, or that represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or d. Important archeological data or the potential to yield important archeological data. (2) The retention of specific aspects of historical integrity, including location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling and association, that convey significance as a heritage resource worthy of preservation. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(2)) Sec. 36-715. - Determination of eligibility. The heritage preservation board shall review the inventory of heritage resources and evaluate the significance of all properties identified by survey. If it determines that a surveyed heritage resource appears to meet at least one of the heritage landmark eligibility criteria, the heritage preservation board may, by majority vote, issue a determination of eligibility for planning purposes. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(3)) Sec. 36-716. - Nomination of a heritage landmark. Nomination of a property to be considered for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark shall be submitted to the council by the heritage preservation board. Each nomination shall be accompanied by a heritage landmark nomination study prepared by the city planner. This study shall: (1) Identify and describe in detail the heritage resource being nominated; (2) Explain how the property meets one or more of the heritage landmark eligibility criteria; (3) Make the case for historical significance and integrity; and about:blank 3/28/2016 Edina, MN Code of Ordinances Page 2 of 3 (4) Recommend a plan of treatment for the heritage resource, with guidelines for design review and specific recommendations for preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction, as appropriate. The study shall be accompanied by a map that clearly locates the property, a detailed plan of the nominated heritage resource, and archival quality photographs that document significant features of the building, site, structure, object or district. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(4)) Sec. 36-717. - State historic preservation office review. The city planner shall submit all heritage landmark nominations to the state historic preservation officer for review and comment within 60 days. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(5)) Sec. 36-718. - Planning commission review. The city planner shall submit all heritage landmark nominations to the city planning commission for review and recommendations prior to any council action. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(6)) Sec. 36-719. - Public hearing. On receipt of the heritage landmark nomination documents and the comments of the state historic preservation office and the city planning commission,the council shall hold a public hearing to • consider the proposed landmark designation. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(7)) Sec. 36-720. - City council designation. The council may designate a property as an Edina Heritage Landmark by resolution. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(8)) Sec. 36-721. - Designation of heritage landmarks on zoning map. The planning commission shall place all designated heritage landmarks on the official city zoning map. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(9)) Sec. 36-722. - Review of permits. (a) To protect significant heritage resources,the heritage preservation board shall review all applications for city permits for the following types of work in relation to a designated heritage landmark: (1) Demolition of any building or structure, in whole or in part; (2) Moving a building or structure to another location; (3) Excavation of archeological features, grading or earth moving in areas believed to contain significant buried heritage resources; and (4) New construction. . 3/28/2016 about:blank Edina, MN Code of Ordinances Page 3 of 3 (b) No city permits for the types of work described in subsection (a) of this section will be issued without a certificate of appropriateness signed by the city planner and approved by the heritage preservation board evidencing compliance with the comprehensive heritage preservation plan. Applications for a certificate of appropriateness shall be made on forms provided by the planning department and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in section 2-724. The application shall be accompanied by plans and drawings to scale, which clearly illustrate, to the satisfaction of the planner, the work to be undertaken if the permit is granted. Certificates of appropriateness may be granted subject to conditions (c) Permit review decisions shall be based on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, the comprehensive heritage preservation plan and the heritage landmark preservation study,for each designated property. (d) The city planner and the heritage preservation board shall complete their review of applications for city permits requiring certificates of appropriateness within 45 days of the date of application. (e) The city planner and the heritage preservation board may issue certificates of appropriateness for work projects submitted voluntarily by owners of heritage resources. (f) To ensure compliance with the goals and policies of the comprehensive heritage preservation plan, the heritage preservation board shall review every application for a preliminary plat, conditional use permit, variance or rezoning, in relation to a designated heritage landmark; and the city planning commission shall give the heritage preservation board a reasonable opportunity to comment on such projects before making its recommendation to the council. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(10)) Sec. 36-723. -Appeals. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the heritage preservation board or an administrative official may appeal such decision by filing a written appeal with the city clerk no later than ten days after the decision of the heritage preservation board or the administrative official. If not so filed, the right of appeal shall be deemed waived and the decision of the heritage preservation board or administrative official shall be final. Upon receipt of the appeal, the city clerk shall transmit a copy of said appeal to the heritage preservation board. The council shall hear and decide all appeals in the manner provided by section 36-100. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(11)) Sec. 36-724. -Violation. Violations of the provisions of this chapter or the conditions of approval granted thereunder shall be a misdemeanor. This chapter may also be enforced by injunction, abatement or any other appropriate remedy, in any court of competent jurisdiction. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(12)) Sec. 36-725. - Maintenance of heritage landmark properties. Every owner or person in possession of a designated heritage landmark shall keep the property in good repair. (Code 1970; Code 1992, § 850.20(13)) Secs. 36-726-36-748. - Reserved. about:blank 3/28/2016 CITY OF EDINA MEMO City Hall• Phone 952-927-8861 O w Fax 952-826-0389•www.CityofEdina.com k ®•� O) N�v• CbHesu�aS60�] Date: April 13, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review — 4528 & 4530 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch planproposal toredevelop he The properties at 4528 and 4530 France Avenue. (Seeproperty lo applicant is proposing to tear down the existing b match ng at 4530 thanddtbgld an addition lot. above the existing garage at 4528 France thatwould A bank drive-through is proposed along France Avenue. (See the applicant's narrative, building rendering and site plan on pages A5—A14.) The plan is generally consistent with a sketch plan that /were reviewed receivefor redeveCoulopmealsont nt of the site back in 2011. At that time the plan was generally concluded that a small area plan was not required gon and c'tyto council minutesrezoning. uonpeviously agesA15- considered plans and the planning commis A22.) The proposed building is slightly smaller than the one proposed in 2001. te the The proposal would require a rezoning. PUD Ira d PCD-4.D-1 Ing would The PCD-4 zoning is reflective proposal. Currently the sites are zoning PCD of the Rapid Oil Change building that was in operation for many years. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the PCD-1 Zoning Ordinance standards. Should the City decide to rezone this site to PUD, the proposed setbacks, height Pl ase notebuilding that several of City of parking stalls would become the standards for the lots. Standards are not met under conventional zoning. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 i CITY OF EDINA MEMO 4,91� ,,r ( . ),10, Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front—France Avenue 35 feet Side—South 25 feet 75 feet 10 feet** Side— North Rear—Setback to R-1 Pro ert 25 feet 15 feet** p Y 25 feet 15-20 feet** Parking Lot Setbacks Front— France Avenue 20 feet Side—South 20 feet 0 feet** Side— North 10 feet 3 feet** 0 feet(existing condition) Building Height Two Stories One Story Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 100% Lot size = 36,335 s.f. 26% Gross s.f. = 9,380 s.f. Parking Stalls 47 stalls (for office space) 59 stalls (for retail space) 47 stalls Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Landscaping Screening required for non- No screen proposed from the residential buildings or residential property** structures within 200 feet of residential property **Would require Variances if no PUD TRAFFIC/PARKING/SITE ACCESS A traffic and parking study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. REZONING — Working Principles for Development The applicant has been asked to respond to the Working Principles for Development in the Southdale area with any formal application. ICit y of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO 91NA rte\ o� et� PUD a• y • iCb_FYpi.SES The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. While the proposal would be an improvement over the existing building on the site, and the uses are compatible in the area, staff has similar concerns to those that were raised in 2001: ➢ Lack of screening to the neighborhood to the north. ➢ A potential for a shortage of parking with retail use. ➢ Buildings with parking in front of the building. ➢ The drive-through on France. ➢ Pedestrian safety; lack of boulevard style sidewalk. 11111 City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 nn i CountyProperty{ Date: 4/7/2016 • •iI r I Ili :err 1 rli -7- I r., r it'll'it '.r r,.. I — 1 inch =800 feet PARCEL ID: 0702824440137 Comments: OWNER NAME: Noonan Properties Lic Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS:4530 France Ave S, Edina MN 55410 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Non Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead PARCEL AREA: 0.22 acres, 9,476 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN • ff COUNTY 2016 i l Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 4/7/2016 , ..,3 " *40 ..._,Az �`r T, �,� /"� `R J 1. 6-1,--1.9 381. .mC;f ".t' ,1-,r, d£ ,-,..1/4--:-*,l . "� i 1.1er ,;;Ak R Fry,. #111/N.0"- 't ,./A*1 N �., R a 4 '4,.., . . 1 S" © " aka. 'ei e ''' '1‘' ' _A r 4 f j� R {i pj :vit.9' . _ t R � d%lo. ¢ ►c . i+dry ' _ ,......A01$*' AO • G' c , '� *i" r g R - � _ �- a ` as k 'r°. , 1. ,!�r-�Y+ rla s ,o: .3-..:.; r .aa' . I r �•.: hnczY.I _ ...C .,egtgi aZ26 T % p.� y Ir. Jj .., ., t RCl. C�Cx4R'f�� ,;'' _II { `1 .._ -._ La :.y�� • •ro„ EL,1. '""146'i `' ci ---1-1-,„-_,i,....: ,,,...,. . ...,1•4,-..i..:2.-..,A., :I� ,�}.�j i�.r.y Axa._ Ar .' '` `1,....$7.... J rk,1 o to 12.• ', _ '' • 464- 1 inch =200 feet PARCEL ID: 0702824440137 Comments: OWNER NAME: Noonan Properties Llc Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS:4530 France Ave S, Edina MN 55410 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Non Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead PARCEL AREA: 0.22 acres, 9,476 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(H)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 A r - )in County Property Map Date: 4/7/2016 r "' x 1.,0 .,iiklftt'‘',,,,,,t4e. :iiicCi .:4' - '''l i. . A ,}8 - y i .. _ '"., '' ETM x 1r' s fi x .7 ' . W' ' qq,,�pt.fiiY b- o- 2: *x kNk 5, `:� a t,,,,,,,, µ ,,....,,,,..,., ,A , ,., • 4.4 � clir' '' ., 4, q..... rt 1 -10 q4# 4 121,,, ,i n. , y $ a xj ,' .t _a `r r,, { R 1 inch = 50 feet I PARCEL ID: 0702824440137 Comments: OWNER NAME: Noonan Properties Lic Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS: 4530 France Ave S, Edina MN 55410 PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Non Preferred HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead PARCEL AREA: 0.22 acres, 9,476 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN II - COUNTY 2016 i1` j9 - .-'- . ' \ .,-. \ e 3'.:i° , .40 ' ''G — '... -IEW-'' L Of ',...;!,7,-,,,,': I ".,. Ax 391u a+ /.. y, Y'y � r ryl^` ; x. �' tS r ..._ {° # d .. ,tr 4,500 rt,- 6-7 r'T• , x .i s t$ , r 3020 t• ' f � +fdpi } FXIi' + "r J .« a J4U A/ r ; + f`y[ lgs"5. fff��� y - te ` es 1CU2 ,':q 'i .'ti, -., f.1 r�:.l � 1 i a r :,...4.14.„.;: � ,, ,'+"t.. rte' l,,�4 r .. , -1"I• r�o,s` f� ale � . t t!� t:** 11 J90S Z :* r1 ! r „ f +k- , W;T `ti b r« + A ir1 • HCl .; , d" c I I i� r �• _f 1 I 4001Beg fid▪ : L I 1� r . I F 4003 I; {�� I •4U05 cyyy '� , ..I r ••••'.Ji 4007 •• _r/ i- k F 0 4011. 6. ` � 4532, 1 t .- ' '.•.',),,,,-A-4-'01104-tmr--.. . - , 7 : ,. ) ;.'';'1, ,-4,4,,,-.: ile .4 rF 4t4,14-4. :•,. .. .• - OW, ... as , ,. A.q• I tz,',''''' r I 4 1 3 4540+ I III. tl;uccmdu..Ac.Ja•Co.S'9e�(:0:76G53105 ........ _ t _�L__ _. CuR& . iJT ZbJUJ6 Aa_ pity of Edina _----- 7904 V $t • Loud 24 3)10 t, House Number Labels 3916 4 1 �• ' I ;R Street Name Labels 24 �_ -1 r .I r/ City Limits c uw3- tt i 4, .-_----_,:_:_i.,' ')t /✓ Creeks i as9o, L „+;a_, j r ❑ Lake Names $ C Lakes 3920 004:,14, 1 I Ip 1� ❑ Parks 7970 0, d . ,/t; -1590 Zoning j Y I I T r...„ _-r {�, 0.7.,l. O APOSAstaool oP Y::g0ct'Il t ,m +v[k HObd 1t iD 3940 , - .r ❑ { c t 0atr•-t) ` —.— @ ti 4 r ,..t '�;. L7UU•54A1>ci Da6aPaw 1DaYrmIY 4000 - P .p '=r ❑ MU0-B Slam DNNaPrrtant D.tridl t` 'rte 7 i^t, ❑ PCD•14PI ale lu!tivt) =a T°33 3 3'SL C.' g mite SPla s1C rc 10u:g1 Opp( "'`"'"�' IIS a r r P00•]ER:,nnei Cemrrcr ID Hrmll I tl t'iYvo • III PCDd JP+mnai L'rnur_r...il Digritl] i £ ?909 I 1 i r t` OPO 4Plaaaoi lnluc,rul D:,lrid) fl ,rc'". „ -,k r- ❑ POD-1 02.3,51 Off.C.t tr;.IY 7 . Illik. , :,..413, , r 7907 "7I ru P / I POD•2SP1, iOff.Di t-D l f r �' f xis +c::: I CID kr) q - Parcels -,... .4 2000 Aerial Photo E I =5?2 4541 ,� ......W 45.76 .. - . , , _. A � 1541 4580 , CA) ro .:.w va% vim-._xcaca>x ----- • - _i r 2 _�. _ _ .. IIF -"'--1:-,1.',. I - ifil C'71 r s� lJ o tie,. 4'�r r E. mrd tii ltl 1c3 1k i== _ City of Edina .. _----- __ — Legend 4248 4249 Ili4248 - 4351 House Number Labels 653R14101091126110 Street Name Labels 41 City Limits Y109 417 II 4302` 3915391339113909 r7 903 n !/n Creeks 4TII ®4003 d001 105''4103 4303 E1Lake Names Lakes 1304 E Parks ql 3920 391,3916 dal ' Zaning 4303 '303924 ® APO{Alva Park.ne DsysdS 4310III 1936 ® 00 El MDD•4iM-wod 0aM4amvnt DMridl d31t IIIMOD•5{Mimi DalcaaPm.a 0.211.jt) 4010 I 24 111 MUDaSMicy O<rcsM4aaalOMr Mei.) 0006 4316lill 051 � 3999 � � F::D•/(Piunal Coarrcnsal&idrid) 40721 .lOD4 . r 0' in FLD2SP..„.. mnr....cull D 4ru1) emtl� - PCOJ{Y:naa/Cwr�cc10atri7l \ . POD-4tPtut.i C..11-crcal 0isl c11 '®' 401/ ., 79}8 Q P:O tPbtao4'M..irisl Didr•:1j 1_ 4500 ❑ PC9I SPW.=tCff�Uitr'stl 3920 ❑ POD-2{PSaaci Off:w Da f.M I 4401 3930 /�� I. PRO.1 tPand Rez`4aa1's10imr.s1l { ,4405 4006 3940 // ■ PRD3{Plan.R.icul:el 0..i.ell Pr 4000 / ■ P:D-0SPhnnd11...1 ntial6'atrir11 4406 4407 �2 / kE7rkl 4094 ■ Pa0•4{POonn!Rac44.1010ilr:_II 4409 3905 . Pa0•5{Pin and R�ceI�Oigrin9 4410 4008 3507 ■ P&R•4{Pk.n.SMIer 0 mud) 4010 3971 4411 ,, 4012 • R1 ts:n9abuo:=w u.x1 4001 ® ina-2;OallaM Gaa:4ns U.k1 4014 4003 1,14 ` , - 4005 r . S1 1 J ® aM011k7ia+al Mei a al Dis1.1l ti, N}6 4007 CrID1 \ ❑ Parcels 4416` 4908 E 4052 4046 4011 4013 4532 5 4059 101 !P 4536 4060 4540 4047 4544 ©400140514068 4544 , AiiiS 4548 4 / 4600 4001 -M 4601 - fl4601 4943 2 M aem.lao:aheM1 Cv '• FfetG:' EiAs W4607 2539 D TAr. "c..).'45:5).1N- A f je.,--*7.)...N- ter` 5 'j 11'' •+ .-- >d 111 \ ,:-.,01,7,:,,it , : 4 L gPEI 40T Edina Gateway NAPR/I/IT/ vi f 4528-4530 France Ave Project Summary March 30, 2016 Our team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the approvals for the exciting Edina Gateway Project on France Ave. We will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this rejuvenated neighborhood. Development Team Architect: Edward Farr Architects: Ed Farr Developer/Owner: Orion Investments:Ted Carlson & Nino Pedrelli Ed Noonan (Current Land Owner/Seller) Lead Tenant: Gateway Bank: Brian Maxwell, Bruce Downey Site Area : 4528 Parcel: 18,764 sq ft/.43 acres 4530 Parcel: 9,456 sq ft/.22 acres Combined Parcel: 28,220 sq ft/.65 acres Property Zoned: Existing Office: PCD-1, Existing Rapid Oil Change Bldg: PCD-4 Proposed Redevelopment: New 5,730 sf Multi-Tenant Office building built above existing parking garage to compliment adjacent building at 4528 France. Vacant Rapid Oil Change station would be torn down. Proposed Occupancy: Professional Office: Gateway Bank, Existing Office Tenant, other business tenants TBD Proposed Parking: 23 Surface Stalls+ 24 Under-Building Stalls =47 Stalls total. Required parking: 47 based on 5/1000 office use (59 based on zoning district calcs) Building Setbacks: City Standard Existing Condition Proposed (PCD-1) Office Addition Building Setbacks Front/East(France Ave) 35 ft 37 ft 75 ft Side/South 30 ft 2 ft 15 ft Side/North 0 ft 20 ft 20 ft Rear/West 30 ft 2 ft 20 ft History: This project was previously presented to the planning commission in 2011 and received a favorable response. The commission noted that this use was preferred to the Rapid Oil Station, yet the small area created made the redevelopment complex from both a development and planning perspective. The project did not proceed past the planning commission due to the fact that the expansion plans of the primary tenant at the time fell through. It should be noted that Orion eDevelopments and Gateway Bank are firmly committed to this project. Overview/ Planning Concept: By replacing the existing Rapid Oil Change building with a high character building with an occupancy that better matches the surrounding businesses this project would add character to the neighborhood. Additionally, adapting the existing parking garage to support the businesses above would revitalize that building that has been largely untouched for many years. The adjacent 4528 office has been a success, and this project aims to be an extension of that design by bringing a consistent and familiar feel to the neighborhood that is already integrated and successful. The future tenants of the building would be Professional Office occupancies, including a new business to Edina, Gateway Bank. Building Design:The building design will be an attractive façade matching materials found on the 4528 building. Large Glass windows, Brick Accents and stucco will combine to give it character and identity similar to the 4528 building which, based on feedback from the 2011 application, is loved by the neighborhood. The rear and side of the new building would feature a walk-out roof top deck/green space above the parking garage. This intent of this exterior space is to provide a buffer to the residential properties to the west, while also providing a positive outdoor amenity to the building tenants.The height of the building would match the existing 4528 building. To accommodate the banking tenant, a small drive-up lane will be provided on site for the convenience of the bank customers. This drive-up is anticipated to have less than 30 visits per day based on data from Gateway Bank's headquarters in the Mendota Heights. Gateway Bank Narrative: Gateway Bank is a traditional community bank with a branch in the Village at Mendota Heights in Mendota Heights, MN. The bank was started by John Schreier, CEO and Bruce Downey, President. The bank opened its doors in January 2004 and has served the Mendota Heights and surrounding communities over the last twelve years. Clients enjoy the modern products we offer while maintaining old fashioned customer service (including fresh baked cookies in the lobby each day). Over the twelve years of serving the community, Gateway Bank has been recognized by the Mendota Heights Mayor and City Council for their involvement with events and volunteering. The "Gateway Gives" initiative is our way of giving back to the community and includes the following: • Teaching Children to Save at local schools • Speaking at local High Schools • Participating in a Summer Internship Program for local High School Students • Gateway Bank 5K running race • Annual Fall Festival—over 800 pumpkins given away, doughnuts and coffee, face painting, balloon animals • Sponsorship of community events around the bank • Sponsorship of local teams • Hosting community events at the branch • Meals on Wheels • Food drives (Neighbors Inc.) • Toys for Tots MO Over the last ten years we have been looking for the right spot for a bank location in Edina. We currently have over fifty clients and shareholders in the Edina community. In addition to these relationships: Bruce Downey (President) grew up in the Morningside Neighborhood; his father Art Downey is in his 60th year of coaching the Edina High School boys swim team; and Brian Maxwell (Senior Vice President) is a ten year resident of Edina and has three children that attend Valley View Middle School and Creek Valley Elementary. The bank, its employees and its owners are excited about the opportunity to work with Ted and Nino on this redevelopment project and believe it is a great opportunity for Gateway Bank to begin a long lasting relationship with Edina and surrounding communities. Adjacent Properties: By removing the Oil Change building and updating and revitalizing the parking garage, the adjacent properties would be positively impacted by the development. The surrounding businesses along France Ave align well with the proposed development. Parking: Through much effort on this tight site, we are proposing a plan with 47 parking stalls which equates to a total of 5 stalls per 1000 sf. This is a standard often used by municipalities for general office type buildings. The stalls would be distributed between surfaces stalls along the front of the building adjacent to France Ave, and within the parking garage which is accessed by a sloped driveway which leads to the entrance behind the building. Public parking would be reserved for the convenient surface stalls. The parking garage would be clearly marked as Private and dedicated for employee parking only. The surface parking lot would be buffered from the sidewalk and France Ave by beautiful landscaping. A bike rack is also proposed to encourage alternative transportation. Utilities: The property currently has access to utilities due to the current buildings on site. Landscape Design/ Buffer: A key aspect of our design will be to create a landscape buffer in the space between the surface parking lot and France Ave. Our aim is to create a pedestrian friendly, walkable project by using landscaping to create a buffer between the parking lot and the sidewalk and street. Site Signage:A monument sign is proposed along France Avenue adjacent to the drive-up bank kiosk. 7 Community Benefits from the New Project 1. Gateway Bank would be expanding into Edina, bringing new resources and jobs as described above. The leadership of the company is already firmly rooted in the city. 2. The 4530 France building is abandoned and lacking character consistent with the neighborhood. The property is ready for a fresh, new development. 3. By expanding upon the facade of the 4528 building we will be bringing a consistent and familiar feel to the neighborhood that is already integrated and successful. 4. We are supporting the pedestrian environment along France Avenue. • 5. A portion of the building roof will have a roof deck with plantings to provide a pleasing view for the adjacent residents. This would be a vast improvement as compared to the black rubber roof the currently exists above the parking garage. 6. The proposed site plan of the project would reduce the amount of curb cuts from 4 down to only 2. 7. The new development is using existing utilities and roads in the community. Urban planning considers this good stewardship to reuse existing sites with current infrastructure. ,A-t( if - -------.2 -.-:-.- , ' SKETCH PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE [,, -,.. v • ,, , . . ,, ..,1 - 1,-7.„„t,—..--..;,......•,„:"4: N,Ir,. •EDINA GATEWAY - - ..- , ,. :..."••••., I, 'WM ' 4528-4530 France Ave ,,,,w. . ,ftab...7 iikuramma7.,-,- - Edina, MN .....,_ . i Existing Buiidings . , ' ':;,- , -;,f.;,014 PO, GATE WAY BANK 1,.,, -..mQ INVES MENTS .111141. ...... * "..."-= ______ ----__.----- ------ ------ -=---7 _.-.10.•=.---- ...____,_______ . ..-- ..,----.- ......, ---------,------ _ -------------- ,;',; kIttrikt AlViC -------jtri;11111 I riiiiii , ..., i...,x„ „Tiot. , 1 1 1-,, 11, Pe- - ', ___,.,...-c--------NO ..,,js Voilisi WI.. AA' , ....„1„..., \ '... 1..' 7. N7 ...=,_ _...„. ....... Project Contacts Itirse )" ARARR earson __ -1.-,. ... .,„ ...e.. ,.,, ,,..----- EDWD FTd Cl ARCHII ECTS INC 952-848-7788 _, Nino Pedrelli *, *- \ < 4(r) - \ / . ISSUE DATE 03.30.16 4,...-• ,.......v" 612-325-8838 . ., \ . Eat ei.c<ss, <,. Mb PROJECT NO . 'Z'' Ed Farr (Architect) . .:P. qp ,.\'‘,,-r 952-943-9660 16.016 --- Edina Gatew=‘,Building I Looking Northwest ' 'OC47i ) , Il arm ;f i ti- � Ill p' * ; '4... •�. f. 3 ±. . . I EDIA), A • � Parking Garage r „L s� . N Z" r gtSh•• - *r4, 1461•' • r. /ir // Existing Office )11: ~' y Ryle w, ,r- , „...-.„...- --, � v AP . �. ~t h r « ryu fi 1 .. F ti „7-7--.• - ��• (` rr "fy' rim, I • �': 11111 t j :`E @ _......« _ -.rte•x , Gt * O��f Iasi;. L...1_1. J. k }1M _ fi � III jf • New Elements of ei da- _ _ �!�. , ..--A.- Linden Hills Building cL Li\ ____,E.AFA rit,,,...)( 1/LE.7? '' . '`• '''.5141 .-1 - i ,j,,w ,,.....____ _ ,_., , . . r... ,,,,,, . , , - i , 'it-• I' - • ..,F`, , - A(/ W PROJECT EDWARD n/�DDp[] AlJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE EI)WNW FNV\ /` . ORrO�I GATEWAY BANK EDINAGATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 Aerial Photo tiBctilT� isiNcj A INVC` MENTS • .10: �_ Site Plan Not-s 40,4 �" "' . Roo.Plaza_ .. 452 -4530 France Ave Project 1 7 4 Proposed Building Size:9,380 sf (combined) a �` . '*a. t' :. //!! � + �. Parking Provided:47 Spaces �s I 4t Parking Garage 4 4- - - ''" Entrance "" Zoning:PCD-1(Planned Commercial) (24 Stalls) t Bldg Setbacks:Front 35',Side 25',Rear 25' 5,730 SF Office Bldg C Parking Setbacks:20"from ROW,Side 10' jabove Parking Garage I * Max Building Height:g 2 Stories 4 � / � � I 1111Nni� �f v;> room 23 stalls(surface) d� �, • f it ` .,,,,,,,,v?Sn'O701,,,.S onyea., v.. A. \\ ^y. .•. .. cgs' ay. a ifr: ...,-„,2-, Banking Drive-Up/Signage , Landscape Buffer I Enhanced Sidewalk -. Schematic Site Plan Scale:1"=30'-0" I IIj/) w vnOJEcr EDINA GATEWAY PROJECT ADAMS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ®RO1N GATEWAYr1 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 ISSUE IiANK BN o3.3a.16 Site Plan e�vuarF�ax .'..f INVr�, MENTS ARC�IITE(,'iS IN(; " <>_..- —axe_ . w 2 al °�.►o. '44 ' 1111 rr111� digill �i, p 0 _.„.3— ;+■� —. 14R 7 r s `d�€fi d• ? �'"■ '"•":1 ': j-— '— *- ' r '''. _ 10::i .u,..0 ” istaI - . _,► rri r .y, �� O,` ast !rte ~ `I!`~� �� I _ _ , _ __ ____. ... ...__ ,.... ,,;„ ..„4„, _ ,._ ,...., ... - _ ••••_„.„.- �• � I p,P -ILL r_� am:..... ""0-1111 f - 1. ,.. .. NY .,,I..„,_ Y �_ r �� ,r libi r OIL 4., eip . . . . 0. ,, ,, . .0. _ ,,_ ... ,..,,, ,_, Aerial View Looking West above France Ave. 60 - ROIYY PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE EDWARD FARR0 EDINA GATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 3D View 1 AnaiiEl1 jNL. A2. OR11ON GATEWAY BANK • INVr." MENTS r — ,' ..� `�x'r k .,1 '�T. C 1-r---i „te "...:,-. 2:.-- , tilki, ...........,:: .il 0 9r (lag ,- • 1i,- --- rr "Nit / w 11111.11 r / �fl. i 4di�17� hl r ..I l----;1"11!'..,,,,r—H-1-7 7-1"4"*."-11-- mil iii 'N{ AA 1 ijjiPt`ti i.�e "'"""- -_ =„ a �0 �\� • �� �EiA ^a�►- o '---� �r r 7 -----;------1' -- 4. r ` o °' ‘A.-- --.' N.?Ifyligh.114-' 46.:S4):-!-i,,,,,' , '1:'''J'4r:..---<—<:---Hgi4-trf-' E-- 'r7------ )----'------Fr 71; -.'' �. , ''� L sh ,I ,� �•. . Fr- ,' T Aerial View Looking Northwest above France Ave. A ) w PROI[R ORION (' EDINA GATEWAY PROJELTRESS 4528-AO30F PROJECT NO. BRAWN BY ISSUE , 7TL WA} BANK 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 I 3D View 2 -EDWARD FARR Q 2.1 INVf: MEATS ° ACWi CTSI /"1 • --------- -- — ej .. -,--- . _-- -- — ---4--'-- --', . '...ig.aq ..1 7., ' ,.'"* .dmil .'•Ir''T—'--''''vla "'' ''',"" ,,,,,,,,,, ftw,mo,,iloyeafte..' ":'- __ .„, . ,t.,,_,_. ----__________.,.._,...,'' ..-- '""""r—"-- --.4"------, '-'--- ,.. - "...""...- c. 0,D ---,...... _ ......,,Z 4iin, —•---•—• r---- k.4." - -X• P'1111ritgrir „ 11"1 11.11V - I - 11.111.1IMINFI I IVO we*. !„,.',...a.fi. , li 11 i il " " 111104 14°41 3111' - I .7- Zr- Mir I .47.,''''- .901017.4-ila-16"Villiillel 4'1.'4r r. 't. 111A ' -,4.,•"': --. - 1.11111Wapt - .7- ,'"---7:' - .7.t4li 4' I - lir AN — '' 1111 • . ',,, , ----: "Ilig,..-',4,..,. '.."- 'v 1 I•.,., -- ' , --'—p -----------------_-_, ,.I OP. ,,-- -- .,,L •rmaiktma. ,4\i tt5 • -,-.- - or- ihk.A'"' air qr ' < =z1--- — -- ---'--- - .. 'IV — .„ ...,.......mm,, ---=•-•, - "'jm. ,77., 7, ....„,..,"- .6\I *.-, ' ..0.1140k 1Z 44 ,4, „Away — .... ,,,e AS 0-410.441711 ,"--- - . . • *I.' .,. ........pre...., ^ ,r. .0400 ' - ..* _...- 44„, 4 (44" — - le— ,.„.„,,,,' . %.... .- .. 1 < I - View Looking East towards Roof Plaza Aerial View Looking Southeast -'" -n•-• !--.' .r.,_ .,...- -----... . % . pis 1,--77-' . * ° - --. 4 • I, .....1 ..... 1 E____ ,„,„, • 1 1,,,, holAv .,,,,i_.__ ' 0, ,11 -111/ m 1 u - • vaimatiosilinickhfiiiiiiitlidittem ilk!NIL .iiiilLi u ,4110.101.11"iiii lairck,FAik.04-,,....air 41_ „ ,----i,--id., ...a,, ....„..m.a,,,,- imar___,, .-ele,_,.,,r....-,..61t.•,._40.t,,, .. j, — - 4..tj,..411PPI- Alk......-0'w MEM Ilt-tfil .... '•••Po.7.-.:: yip--••--42401=---- ----- '-- '1"1 1111',ANINIMist Mirk .. . F...0.A. - - — ------...-.. 4.. -.4.. .- - .--4G ,,a,.,17 `11,..._, ..1, .,...-- 1 lihnrialak.'' te' ,,. r-----7;" -. ., 4' .--.' . 1____ •• -14filiak'441 -I.----'-- -- --,.. ---- V f)t- --- --_____________ • ---------_____,I, J View from France Ave --- 7- '.77.1 Aerial View Looking Southwest above France Ave. 1 „,,-, 0'te-t Aig9- -------' ISSUE 3 D Views , ,...r6T.,-(r.v-,,,,,,,- PROMO'NO DRAWN LIV riii() . PROJECT PROJECT ADEMESS 4528-4530 France Ave 16 016 BN 0330.16 ORION GATEWAY BANK EDINA GATEWAY INVE MENTS A 11 kc .1-61/N- fi ii 17), •.t. '.;.41 ':" , ''.1 . ,..,' 1: -.',.. .11. . '-'71..Cire-1'' -,,--" ------ ! 1 ..4 .,'„,7.-_- -,. - ........ i 1— .. -...,_ - .., _ -.,_. : , '---------7:: $ 51 ------------ • ____________ ---,-------_,„, , .. .;•&..,,-,,,i-,,,-- /1 , ... V • ,!' - --' --- ..„.: ...... ., _. , ...4-- .4.2.1 ' .. .t• '' ,_ ..-,,,,,,.,3-7'.`'' '.Vil. ' ' :17-•-- -.. , '-----., ''''' '' ,, ri N\\ ___Cil.: 1,,,,‘ 1.4%,,,,--.-,_ -,,,,,,,_—.1-.,„a{'.. ..',.., 7----- ' .... t.\• .----",,,,-,.,''''''•:.' .''''‘ '' 1 I ' — ____......- , • • rr ..., --mr-iir Ilf- ,--A,..it-*,L',„ ' -- ‘ •_441 •... ,,,,,.-0.,,, Aitt.;.1c.:,,,',. ...;..., --7 •:',-4;-,*;-414,, *:*:*.-'4.*-----:' - *• '''. .,-.,,. '-.1/4e,,r,-`' -,,,,.---.'',''',-- '----*.,„, -' „.-- ----.44. - - „4.." / le.,,,i, ,it,--.-, .''tv't .„, ott. -.. , ,. ,. ' '' ' . ,- .a. ,.4_-,-"' 440y,.iitttk.-'•• , ,,.<'-. ''',+ 14: '1'' ' S*1-4,!4‘. -':...;4'. '''. ''''. ' ' It • '' '. ','' 4N --- /_, Jii,1-4,Z1-)1., rd. .„: ' ' •- .' ,'..,•': !..',:''',1,:',• -' ' ' ". ..11414- ' - ''' • ' -- tt c'" - • - '-••'421" ' ' - --- ------ . . _ ;',..• - ., -4 - ,-.-... ' 4,— , .-- -,.-. . -.4„-- • 4, ,,,.,.-,, „,. , —4 - -0.4.t'r ---...44*if L.. '"Wr..,..1' „,:_:1;d1,,,,e:....r.==r..7---a:_.-:----...'_,. ,:-..:: :=..:.;,•"‹.;1'.;,--711...r.:„.i.',•-,,,,,-----7-..--- ,--,..-,eiw.mit, . , 1----- \ 7 .., - - • .,•,.-:•.•.• ..:•,-4.•--,.--.:.,--.,:„.•--,,,,,,, 7,:...•. .:;.,:r...:;:...,..; -.--),..;, -,i--,,Kirzi:4•3,-. „-,-...,--,- •-.,,4441.4.1137_At, ,. . ,.„ z -- ,.. , • ---.......' - ---,-....-:.-4- ,,;.,...:,.,,..,, .---;.,,, ,,--'),,,-,A4,04-..-.0.-,--:-', ,---2,,,,,:;:',------ i------Itris,i,,'....- --- ,...,,,..f.;,.... . ,,,,,,,)„,- ,,....... ..,,•;:,,,„„---i-----H,,-..4„,,,,,,,,,,,pidlor..,,,:4,, ,,,,01., q....... --,...-..- .ii---..0 p• -- ,..--) -,.;4'':-' .'''.-K t• t alr''''.- ' ' , '''' - 4,44,t.,',, „ea.30,,,,op Ate:,,,,;i:i.,..M.TylcZ:r4AsiiitigiAile: ,}i•, .......11 pit y .• • ----- ./ --0''''''."''4''''' ...; '''''' ...- te•I''''44•1',4,=.43'1‘-b•K$11(11.--" g'' ' *---*. ''Z' ' ' ' ' • ". .) ;'' ,i.,:,...-•,,......, .74.•....,:„:„:"..: - ,,,....,,x4N.i....:V;t,4..,,,0,e,,,,f,LNIzt,• I ... ,,,,,,-.4'.,,i,4, 04,1.:',342-44ttArTtc.,'( h 4 ' 1-__T-1.,,,,,,- ------- Z' . . ..,,J.:"•11; '' 1 '' r•••:',;:'''' ''',,-• • ''<4,1]:le'Atiqiit,OV':',04••,-!;', , - , 4101444 ,...,,.-5'. --- E:,:..; --- 70;‘, ,.... Pil :;0101110-=:". = •* 4,;:::- "' **"r'." .11::*f'''','..',-;.. ' ''''''"'"'.-•'-'%, / • . <.,• - .4lit4 • Id' • x .,,. .,.. , ' 8,- ''''' ' '"V,. .,..„..• „, .•k,,,, 4.= ...,.,,i :, :.:',4=',,, ' VI .• ,. = .. f..;--- ...,., , /1'1e . -' ,, • ..-:,1:: + _J 1 P r e I i MI }- e M a r Y Images ....-,,,, t..a.z= ..,,..7.,...- .2/24/11,5J.N. 4528 & 4530 France Avenue South Edina,MN 55424 0 1 I Pillfr .4• EXISTING ROOFTOP , . . I , L• 20-2%1. 49,1 EWNG 0 E itim \o -- — , ill , . \\ 11.11 ' ENCLOSURE L . * I [ • '' ,---.1 '. •- 9,TGE LDIN-- ING 01,[ • C BUIG' EXISTING OFFICE) C . \ RETAIL BUILDING ,. ,‘ \ ------- , \ \ \ -'g'. .I • Wili hL \ ---------• ---- - ' _ d'.› . 1 Ill11 N \ _ .- • ...44 • 301-4. 40 511/ • . tr•\ 5711,1 STA\ • ,,,,,-- MP • ,•7, • • . I _.i 1.-..-." . FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH ®Upper Level Plan r_e_,—, ry- 0 : - -- 5col.1/14,110.805,eikl...1 0 5 in 25' * cc-0) . , _ , 15 16 1 17 78 19 20 27 22 •.%I EXISTING STORAGE . . . 4 r--( EXISTING PARKING GARAGE +a 1 , vfott '. ,ILW, .., ', „-,, L__ •.•, ,/,',,, v get ,,, IRV = 46 I EXISTING STALL WI ao-it 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CLA•C:A0-4.-i '11'14.,11.1..11 %,,415TVIr.11.111.7.4114444f171W L ,IjalaUkw -j wp.,S**§FA , W.E.E.4.4Alk.E=ii.E.11.R..E.TL=E4 ARAFWEM.Lrhgggitigarlg.EArli 4,231WIEREIN EXISTING OFFICE) \ 44E4i firdellaiSMATAIM VirgalpVNEEr._ RETAIL BUILDING ......1.1.1...E.A=A=it...v_ft....E. 400411r=24411.0liti-LAMA41.E4 V_IMTAMitinanafgi,... U 411,NrukaftrAVAETRIR41012i, PriAr.AVATIV4IWN, 44AMENU-'::, Miire,adontligiML-111ai.MTA• E),,ING°11- .ig4FggiadagaMaglIgk 4iig.=4-111=f4a4C1=W1140.ti CHANGE BUILDING ArgriUMIMMIATIZTAarga ",Tato, ITAVAMMT=ALMIlifigt1 V410110;ME-W.‘ ,V10 ':'?,•vldf,40,7=figt NESMENSEIMMEre ------ ' Vti;tMT- .i....ii=1.11=11=1.i..i.=11=o=li.ii.v..L,rq. IHREMAIMMaligaa6A,.,M A=A=VATIEVAMMILIMMILVIEgB "Ir PaaPPRI.NAPAW4-, M0,,TIIM"11, 8it ,OPM- - _.-- .2TAIM-tatnAii 7:7-, nagroirm6=kwant-tr.urng 1 .F....„=E,g_,E=2.—AI.E.N.,,-...,1,-.2-,...nv__.„.5.e44 CB ' u,,,r4114,Eggrm- '11,421***tiO4.1-01EEENELWIRENLitidat4,4?- ,NriatAviratirliloh-i-,AIrAu0Szialgioriviwkniffigintrituilid41016-3.64AiNitliPAWP.*Etkkh*LKdISTMENNWOW=VIMI arnirrill4r"Vit*11"WrIlIFAMMITIRMAAVIVIWnallWaniftiiiMairiSiNOMENSTROMONfit: TramosoakisgaisiagifilwabbnaghtisMirating*.i.***64.40,twoorworgroiNEENEFAARIER*Emont,, WerantligratitialtehadiREMENNEGRESPEREEMMEMEN_ORMIMISMEtmotElgqh JL -L MiSMEIGEGEINNOMEWEEN-INNIRESIMWAREMPHSIBERM-SigitelMASISOKOMM-ENE*, ENI „fflalitlitaMillithiarareMMPRESEMINNEMENSONAM46619NrigaSlifidgetapingits, m i --uve...zu=a=li.A.F..E.1.... ..1=9=E.7......1.=E= .L.TA. 0 N Lower Level Plan ,0 5 10 :51 E x li il' `'l n g Pi n 5 iii NEW181.15 4528 Oa 4530 France Avenue South Edina,MN 55424 filloAl ifolYt11)0 11 5--. � Sketch Plan Review Potential Rezoning Ed Noonan 4528 & 4530 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that the Planning Commission has been asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the properties at 4528 and 4530 France Avenue. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing building at 4530 France, and build an addition above the existing garage at 4528 France that would match the existing building on that lot. Planner Teague explained that the applicant would like to request a rezoning of these two sites from Planned Commercial District, (PCD-1 and PCD-4) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property at 4530 France, where the building that would be removed, is currently zoned PCD-4. The PCD-4 District only allows automobile service centers, car washes, and gas stations. The previous use of the property was a Rapid Oil Change station. Planner Teague noted that this property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan states that within the Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The proposal requires a rezoning whether it is to PUD, or to PCD-1. Therefore, the decision to require a Small Area Plan shall be made by the City Council. Planner Teague commented that while the proposal would be an improvement over the existing building on the site, and the uses would be compatible in the area, staff has some concern over the number of standards that don't meet the minimum code requirements of the PCD-1 district, the shortage of parking, and the lack of screening from adjacent single-family residential homes. Planner Teague concluded that at this time the Commission can provide advisory comments on the sketch plan. Appearing for the Applicant Ed Noonan, Noonan Construction and Scott Newland, Newland Architecture. Ar7 • Applicant Presentation Ed Noonan, 84 Woodland Circle, gave the Commission a brief history of his projects and of the subject sites. Mr. Noonan acknowledged that Planner Teague apprised him of the fact that this area of Edina was identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a candidate for a Small Area Plan. Noonan added that in all honesty he's afraid of what that could mean. Noonan introduced Scott Newland, architect for the project. Scott Newland addressed the Commission and informed them he was the architect of the newer building at 4528 France and the goal of the proposed project is to redevelop the properties to provide a more visually consistent image within the 44th/France Avenue area. Newland stated that the old oil change building would be removed and an addition would be built above the existing garage area at 4528 France. The sites would be rezoned to a PUD district making the site(s) more in keeping with the prevailing zoning and uses. Mr. Noonan and Newland stood for questions. Comments The Commission asked Mr. Noonan if the existing garage would continue to function as a garage. Mr. Noonan responded in the affirmative. The Commission questioned if the parking spaces in the existing garage were included in the parking calculations provided. Mr. Newland responded that the parking calculations included the garage stalls. Continuing, The Commission asked Mr. Noonan the intent of parking garage; would the public be allowed to park there, etc. Mr. Noonan responded that the parking garage would be used for vehicle storage and staff parking, no public parking. The Commission commented that they have some concerns with parking, pointing out that the site was under parked. Continuing the discussion on parking the Commission commented that the configuration of the surface parking appears confusing. They acknowledged that the elimination of one of the curb cut improves the flow; however, the flow isn't clear especially in the middle area. The Commission suggested that eliminating two, not one curb cut could reduce confusion and provide more parking. Mr. Newland said he would be willing to revisit the parking stalls and circulation; however, because of existing conditions three curb cuts would still be needed. The Commission focused on the "primary use" of the building(s) and asked Mr. Noonan if he sees the use as office or retail. Mr. Noonan said he visualizes the space more as office. Continuing, Mr. Noonan said that presently he has two tenants in the building that would like to remain; however, the logistics haven't been worked out yet. Noonan said another option would be an office/condo design. Noonan said he doesn't envision a Starbucks or other high use retailers. • The Commission stated they appreciate the quality of the design and the desire to maintain the character of the area; however are struggling with the front parking lot. The Commission indicated that they felt the front parking lot doesn't match the character of the 44th area. They pointed out the 44th Street area is comprised of buildings close to the street, creating a more pedestrian friendly streetscape. Continuing, the Commission added they respect the work that Mr. Noonan does, it's quality work, and suggested he review the layout to see if a revision to the plan could be designed that was more pedestrian friendly. The Commission also suggested that if a redesign was accomplished that brought the building closer to the street (flip the position of the parking and building) there would be the potential to add a second level of parking over the existing garage. It was also noted if parking was constructed over the garage the site could go down to two curb cuts. Mr. Newland acknowledged that they didn't consider that option, adding they would need to study construction costs associated with such a revision. Mr. Newland and Noonan acknowledged that scenario was creative. Mr. Noonan pointed out with regard to parking that it's always been an issue in this area. He noted Minneapolis is directly across the street and Edina businesses have no control over what happens on the east side of France. Noonan said he believes there is street parking on the Minneapolis side of the street. Continuing, Noonan acknowledged that the site presents some difficulties. He pointed out the grade change, watershed drainage area to the rear, and heavy vegetation with mature trees also to the rear. Noonan acknowledged that the vegetation is a plus as a buffer to the residential properties along West 44th Street and to the west. The Commission acknowledged the potential for a small area plan in this area; however, if the City Council doesn't direct one for this project the "word" still needs to get out to the neighborhood. Mr. Noonan agreed. He said he knows that the Morningside neighborhood has a very active and strong association. Continuing, Noonan said a sign could be posted indicating the sketch plan and process. The Commission noted that regardless of what occurs with this project eventually the City Council will need to take the "small area plan head on". The Commission also acknowledged that initiating a small area plan from start to finish is a long process. Mr. Noonan said the cost of a small area plan would really impact the developer. A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging that this area was identified for a Small Area Plan; however, it would be unrealistic to put development "on hold". The Commission acknowledged and reiterated the City Council would make the decision if a small area plan was needed for this development plan. Chair Grabiel said he appreciates the applicants work on the sketch plan review and the fact that this process was new for the applicant and Commission. Grabiel said one fact that can't be changed is that Minneapolis is directly across the street from this property and the City has no control over what happens on the east side of France Avenue. Continuing, Grabiel said "perfect is the enemy of the good", noting there probably isn't a perfect project that meets all issues. Grabiel said in his opinion this was a worthy plan 411 that would enhance the streetscape along France Avenue and the neighborhood. Concluding Grabiel said in his opinion Mr. Noonan should bring his plan to the City Council. The Commission highlighted the following points: • The Commission acknowledged that the Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as an area where a Small Area Plan may occur. • The City Council needs to determine if a Small Area Plan was needed before this project can proceed. • Keep in mind that the direction of the Comprehensive Plan was walkability and creating and maintaining streetscapes. • Minneapolis is directly east of the subject site and the City has no control over what happens on that side of the street. • The Commission suggested revisions to the plan; Pull the building closer to the street; construct parking on top of existing garage; work on the interior configuration of the parking lot. A redesign of the parking lot could achieve more parking. • The sketch plan presented tonight needs to be presented to the neighborhood. Mr. Noonan thanked the Commission for their input, adding he would consider their comments and would proceed to the City Council. Motion Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend that the Commission formally pass their comments on the Sketch Plan presented by Mr. Noonan to the City Council. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 2009.0004.10. Zoning Ordinance Are • ents Rooftop Dining Planner Presentation Planner Teague remi • -d the Commission this to. as addressed at past meetings. Planner Teague s at their last Planning Commission •-eting the Commission directed him • -vise the ordinance with the following chan. -• ,4a0 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 19,2011 Member Sw nson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Or finance No. 2011-06, amending the Edina City Code concerning the City's Zoning Board of Appeals. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, B 'ndle,Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID - 2011'`COMMODITIES PURCHASE - SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS M ERIALS, CONCRETE, AND WATER TREATMENT C EMICALS-CONTINUED FROM APRIL 5, 2011 Motion •.de by Member Brindle and seconded by Member enson awarding the bid for 2011 Commoditie Purchase for sand, rock, bituminous materials, concret- and water treatment chemicals to the re, mmended low bidders as follows: coarse washed sand (.:livered) to SA-AG at $8.84 per ton; FA-2 eal coat chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock, Inc. at $40.95 =er ton; FA-2 seal coat chips (picked 1.14) to Dresser Trap Rock, Inc. at $27.20 per ton; *asphalt 2350 Base T\ .e 31 or 32 (picked up)to Bitumino 4s Roadways at$42.80 per ton,or to CS McCrossan (picked up) at$40.00 •er ton, or to Commercial Asphal (picked up)at$47.95 per ton,or to Bituminous Roadways (delivered) at $4. 80 per ton, or to Midwest .phalt (delivered) at $56.95 per ton; *asphalt 2350 Base Type 41 or 42 to Bitu 'nous Roadways (picked .) at$47.00 per ton, or to Commercial Asphalt (picked up) at $50.75 per ton, or to S McCrossan (picked p) at $46.60 per ton, or to Bituminous Roadways (delivered) at$54.00 per ton, or to idwest Asphalt (• -livered) at$58.95 per ton; *asphalt 2350 Wear Type 41 or 42 to Bituminous Roadways sicked up) at .43.40 per ton, or to Commercial Asphalt (picked up) at$47.65 per ton, or to CS McCrossan sicked up) .t$43.00 per ton, or to Bituminous Roadway (delivered) at$50.40 per ton, or to Midwest Asphal deliver:.) at$56.95 per ton; *asphalt 2360 Wear Type 31 or 32 to Commercial Asphalt (picked up) at $53.4 per on, or to Bituminous Roadways (picked up) for $56.00 per ton, or to Midwest Asphalt (picked up) at - 00 per ton, or to Midwest Asphalt (delivered) at $62.95 per ton, or to Bituminous Roadways (delivered) :t $63.00 per ton; delivered concrete 3+ yards to AVR, Inc. at $96.00 per cubic yard; delivered concret 1 3 yards to AVR, Inc. at $109.00 per cubic yard; emulsified tack oil to Midwest Asphalt at $3.35 per : lion; rack ioint sealer #3725 to BrockWhite at$0.62 per pound; hydrofluosilicic acid to DPC Industries • $35.8 •er CWT; liquid chlorine to DPC Industries at $36.60 per CWT; water treatment chemical (poly to DPC Ins stries at $6.25 per gallon; Tonkazorb 3% to Hawkins, Inc. at$8.72 per gallon; caustic soda t• awkins, Inc. .t$47.25 per CWT; Lannon stone wall repair to Blackstone Contractors at$26.00 SF; sanitar sewer R1733 co -r complete to Ess Brothers&Sons, Inc. at $240.00 each;storm sewer rnd. R2548 to Ess .rothers&Sons, Inc. -t$395.00 each;storm sewer rect. 3067V to Ess Brothers & Sons, Inc. at $377.00 ea curb box to Neenah .undry at $95.00 each. (*These items were awarded on basis of total cost per to including trucking and lab•r, and past year's performance.) Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ay-.. *AWARD OF BID-SNOW BLOWER- TREET DEPARTMENT Motion made s Member Brindle and seconded by Member Swenson awarding t bid for snow blower, Street Depart -nt, to the recommended low bidder,St.Joseph Equipment(St. e Contract#443412) at$87,745.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote 'five ayes. *AWARD OF BID-POOL Bo ER REPLACEMENT-EDINA A I UATIC CENTER Motion • ade by Member Brindle and seconded by Membe Swenson awarding the bid for pool boiler replacement, ina Aquatic Center, to the recommended low •idder,Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, Inc.at$27,115.00. \, Motion carried on rt Icallvote-five ayes. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED-SMALL AREA PLAN NOT REQUIRED-ED NOONAN,4528&4530 FRANCE AVENUE Mr.Teague explained the Council was being asked to review the sketch plan, provide comment,and determine whether a Small Area Plan was required prior to application for rezoning. He displayed the subject sites, described allowable uses, and presented the proposal of Ed Noonan to tear down the existing building at 4530 France Avenue and build an addition above the existing garage at 4528 France Avenue that would match the 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 19,2011 existing building on that lot. Mr. Teague noted that the proposed redevelopment would require rezoning of these two sites from Planned Commercial District (PCD-1 and PCD-4) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). It was noted that setbacks would not be met with the existing zoning. Mr. Teague reviewed the Planning Commission's deliberation and determination that, at a minimum, the sketch plan should be presented to the neighborhood. The Commission found the proposed office use to be preferable to the existing or allowable uses under the current zoning. However,the Commission felt the proposed front parking lot would not match the character of the 44th Street and France Avenue area and suggested the proposed building be moved closer to the street to create a more pedestrian friendly streetscape. Such a redesign would also provide an opportunity to add a second level of parking over the existing garage and eliminate a curb cut. Proponent Presentation Ed Noonan, 84 Woodland Circle, displayed colored copies of the proposed building. Scott Newland, architect representing the proponent, addressed the position of the proposed addition relative to the street. Mr. Newland concurred that it would reinforce the streetscape to pull buildings forward; however, the existing parking garage was not visible from France Avenue and was part of the parking calculations. He explained that if the building was brought forward, the headlights from cars circulating the parking area would shine into the homes adjacent to the building. In addition, a new foundation structure would be needed and traffic circulation would not marry with circulation on the adjacent lot. Mr. Noonan described the challenges in developing this property and explained the desire of a current tenant to expand on the site. It was noted this parking area was not restricted from public use and that extensive screening existed to the rear of the site. The Council discussed that while the current intent was for office use, the property could also be used as commercial in the future which would result in a larger parking shortage. The Council acknowledged that while it would be a preferable to move the building toward the curb, it was not always possible given site constraints. The Council commented on the need for additional greenscape, additional separation between vehicle and pedestrian movements, and a creative design to "soften" the appearance of the front elevation. It suggested Mr. Noonen explore options to incorporate storm water management such as a green roof,cisterns,or areas of pervious pavement. Member Bennett recalled the 2004 survey of Morningside residents by the Heritage Preservation Board, and that most respondents preferred no change or minor change in the 44th and France business area. She stated her opinion that the proposed redevelopment would be viewed as no more than minor change. The Council indicated the next step would be to present the sketch plan to the neighborhood. Mr. Noonan stated this was an active neighborhood and he looked forward to presenting the sketch plan and receiving input. The Council commended Mr. Noonan for his work to improve areas of Edina. The consensus of the Council was that a Small Area Plan would not be required for 4528 and 4530 France Avenue; rather, the proponent should set up a neighborhood meeting. *SUPER AMERICA NEW 3.2 OFF-SALE LIQ •R LICENSE APPR• 'ED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Swenson approving a -w 3.2 off-sal: iquor license for Super America #4047, 5205 Vernon Avenue,for a period beginning April 20, 011,and : ding March 31, 2012. Motion carried on rollcall vote—five ayes. *TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY APPROVED CONTINUED FROM APRIL 5, 2011 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Swens• :pproving the Tax Increment Financing Policy. Motion carried on rollcall vote—five ayes. • RESOLUTION NO. 2011-48 ADOPTED—REVI NG THE CIT COUNCIL AGENDA Member Swenson introduced and mo -d adoption o Resolution No. 2011-48, revising the Edina City Council agenda as amended to strike a genda item 3, Un ty Statement, and renumber subsequent agenda items. Member Brindle seconded th,%notion. Aad' Edina Gateway 4528-4530 France Ave Project Summary March 30, 2016 Our team is looking forward to working with the City of Edina to obtain the approvals for the exciting Edina Gateway Project on France Ave. We will strive to make this building an outstanding addition to this rejuvenated neighborhood. Development Team Architect: Edward Farr Architects: Ed Farr Developer/Owner: Orion Investments:Ted Carlson & Nino Pedrelli Ed Noonan (Current Land Owner/Seller) Lead Tenant: Gateway Bank: Brian Maxwell, Bruce Downey Site Area : 4528 Parcel: 18,764 sq ft/.43 acres 4530 Parcel: 9,456 sq ft/.22 acres Combined Parcel: 28,220 sq ft/.65 acres Property Zoned: Existing Office: PCD-1, Existing Rapid Oil Change Bldg: PCD-4 Proposed Redevelopment: New 5,730 sf Multi-Tenant Office building built above existing parking garage to compliment adjacent building at 4528 France. Vacant Rapid Oil Change station would be torn down. Proposed Occupancy: Professional Office: Gateway Bank, Existing Office Tenant, other business tenants TBD Proposed Parking: 23 Surface Stalls+24 Under-Building Stalls =47 Stalls total. Required parking: 47 based on 5/1000 office use (59 based on zoning district calcs) Building Setbacks: City Standard Existing Condition Proposed (PCD-1) Office Addition Building Setbacks Front/East (France Ave) 35 ft 37 ft 75 ft Side/South 30 ft 2 ft 15 ft Side/North 0 ft 20 ft 20 ft Rear/West 30 ft 2 ft 20 ft History: This project was previously presented to the planning commission in 2011 and received a favorable response. The commission noted that this use was preferred to the Rapid Oil Station, yet the small area created made the redevelopment complex from both a development and planning perspective. The project did not proceed past the planning commission due to the fact that the expansion plans of the primary tenant at the time fell through. It should be noted that Orion Developments and Gateway Bank are firmly committed to this project. Overview/ Planning Concept: By replacing the existing Rapid Oil Change building with a high character building with an occupancy that better matches the surrounding businesses this project would add character to the neighborhood. Additionally, adapting the existing parking garage to support the businesses above would revitalize that building that has been largely untouched for many years. The adjacent 4528 office has been a success, and this project aims to be an extension of that design by bringing a consistent and familiar feel to the neighborhood that is already integrated and successful. The future tenants of the building would be Professional Office occupancies, including a new business to Edina, Gateway Bank. Building Design:The building design will be an attractive facade matching materials found on the 4528 building. Large Glass windows, Brick Accents and stucco will combine to give it character and identity similar to the 4528 building which, based on feedback from the 2011 application, is loved by the neighborhood. The rear and side of the new building would feature a walk-out roof top deck/green space above the parking garage. This intent of this exterior space is to provide a buffer to the residential properties to the west, while also providing a positive outdoor amenity to the building tenants.The height of the building would match the existing 4528 building. To accommodate the banking tenant, a small drive-up lane will be provided on site for the convenience of the bank customers. This drive-up is anticipated to have less than 30 visits per day based on data from Gateway Bank's headquarters in the Mendota Heights. Gateway Bank Narrative: Gateway Bank is a traditional community bank with a branch in the Village at Mendota Heights in Mendota Heights, MN. The bank was started by John Schreier, CEO and Bruce Downey, President. The bank opened its doors in January 2004 and has served the Mendota Heights and surrounding communities over the last twelve years. Clients enjoy the modern products we offer while maintaining old fashioned customer service (including fresh baked cookies in the lobby each day). Over the twelve years of serving the community, Gateway Bank has been recognized by the Mendota Heights Mayor and City Council for their involvement with events and volunteering. The "Gateway Gives" initiative is our way of giving back to the community and includes the following: • Teaching Children to Save at local schools • Speaking at local High Schools • Participating in a Summer Internship Program for local High School Students • Gateway Bank 5K running race • Annual Fall Festival—over 800 pumpkins given away, doughnuts and coffee, face painting, balloon animals • Sponsorship of community events around the bank • Sponsorship of local teams • Hosting community events at the branch • Meals on Wheels • Food drives (Neighbors Inc.) • Toys for Tots Over the last ten years we have been looking for the right spot for a bank location in Edina. We currently have over fifty clients and shareholders in the Edina community. In addition to these relationships: Bruce Downey(President) grew up in the Morningside Neighborhood; his father Art Downey is in his 60th year of coaching the Edina High School boys swim team; and Brian Maxwell (Senior Vice President) is a ten year resident of Edina and has three children that attend Valley View Middle School and Creek Valley Elementary. The bank, its employees and its owners are excited about the opportunity to work with Ted and Nino on this redevelopment project and believe it is a great opportunity for Gateway Bank to begin a long lasting relationship with Edina and surrounding communities. Adjacent Properties: By removing the Oil Change building and updating and revitalizing the parking garage, the adjacent properties would be positively impacted by the development. The surrounding businesses along France Ave align well with the proposed development. Parking: Through much effort on this tight site, we are proposing a plan with 47 parking stalls which equates to a total of 5 stalls per 1000 sf. This is a standard often used by municipalities for general office type buildings. The stalls would be distributed between surfaces stalls along the front of the building adjacent to France Ave, and within the parking garage which is accessed by a sloped driveway which leads to the entrance behind the building. Public parking would be reserved for the convenient surface stalls. The parking garage would be clearly marked as Private and dedicated for employee parking only. The surface parking lot would be buffered from the sidewalk and France Ave by beautiful landscaping. A bike rack is also proposed to encourage alternative transportation. Utilities: The property currently has access to utilities due to the current buildings on site. Landscape Design / Buffer: A key aspect of our design will be to create a landscape buffer in the space between the surface parking lot and France Ave. Our aim is to create a pedestrian friendly, walkable project by using landscaping to create a buffer between the parking lot and the sidewalk and street. Site Signage:A monument sign is proposed along France Avenue adjacent to the drive-up bank kiosk. 7 Community Benefits from the New Project 1. Gateway Bank would be expanding into Edina, bringing new resources and jobs as described above. The leadership of the company is already firmly rooted in the city. 2. The 4530 France building is abandoned and lacking character consistent with the neighborhood. The property is ready for a fresh, new development. 3. By expanding upon the facade of the 4528 building we will be bringing a consistent and familiar feel to the neighborhood that is already integrated and successful. 4. We are supporting the pedestrian environment along France Avenue. 5. A portion of the building roof will have a roof deck with plantings to provide a pleasing view for the adjacent residents. This would be a vast improvement as compared to the black rubber roof the currently exists above the parking garage. 6. The proposed site plan of the project would reduce the amount of curb cuts from 4 down to only 2. 7. The new development is using existing utilities and roads in the community. Urban planning considers this good stewardship to reuse existing sites with current infrastructure. SKETCH PLAN REVIEW PACKAGE 4. .7.! 17:-.:,,, „ EDINA GATEWAYli ..rte ..erc— ae. . .'.. "..z . '� ;; If,' ' ;' -,, •� f 4528-4530 Franc d4 ` � France qg Edina, MN ¢�~ v i �` � �: .. ------- r,-. ..4. . ., ..,.. _� - �`-„,,,,,,,, _ _ .� 0. lIj\T OR!. „ 4;x,,4.sur O , ,,,.._ 311- --,,, ',-.''',..-",,,,,,,-*- i f4\4 �,tr 1 AT� ti'` A I�T Existing Buildings INVE � MENTS t\IK _ �• r �.w.. r,0101i.:�-•- . _ � y_.__� ”' xi 41 I 11 ••� • 1 SIS, ".I _ ` R ca � � 11f� r R �� �1 o•a V . Project Contacts ___ fiP Ted Carlson o 41 ARt HITECTSIIyc /611.°°° - ti 952-848-778$ \ .1617 . AT ISSUED E Nino Pedrell 03.30.16 612-325-883 - 8 PROJECT NO. Edina Gateway BuildingEd Farr (Arch i+,,,.+► looking Northwest ��— —— 16.016 952-943-9660 ._ . . . , . • , ., ., .1:'..f.4.:-... * •• 7,‘,.r."-• '''''..,.. , - .tr t„,• o'- %-''' 2.440 . ' ik, t olt,,, ..,, . • 1 , • .0 4*. , .44,0,,„i . ,,,,,t x , ,...„ . i • ,c,,, *#** ' "/. / '' ' l'''- - ' , ' 4' I: """ ""."4% * ' '''‘)".! • ' 4-- - ".V:1 ' " ' - ."4*** ' 4 40 ' t• " ''' ,,,'' ' 4:4 ' ' .,... 'Bi4ti.,,,. *4„,4, ,,,,.4, ,,/, . .., .,t,-/ . , , .. If.At.4, 1,',, /,.', Ri", "17:4,0 t / IN. ''''' - ' "frielti. ,J;:l.. :i* -Vtli, -,10..," l'''''.,'- d.;"1" '''' y 6.. ,-- *" : , 't.,‘,. 4 4= 4 „t -,* , , . ,.....t-,4 . n•=,-* - , , , .=,„„, ,i..4,,,,Iv •,,11., '- '1'.." ..:,- 1:„, . - . - --- „„ 1 , - -4,44' , , - , . de. • -'74.-.!:• 4 -, „I",•,,.'.,•,',I•tt-,-; ;,..t- , .Z-...„ -4:04-.:* , , - 4.4-, . ,,.. , it .. _ ,.-, - : .x...., ...--._ . - , • . af ff - ar, rr .--, ' ‘4,1114 -k' " e *e • ' ‘t, . *' , -..A„.' Afit. , • .....<1. 4 „,,..' . ' - ,- . - 0, _.. ... ,11,! . ,,... , .; , . .,. A 4., ' 1° , ,,,..: ,, 4 „...„47k,- . r: ., , tt, .1 . we ii, 1' , , ' ' 441.1 44 • 4g4*' - - . I't artor41; Ak.... .'414.t 1 ,, I , ..,,,,•!14='..„4 , . . N.:„)0,1044- , .116 .1 „, ..; a*"1" # : 41. v:Itt•4......f, 04. iti.,-;1.1 *411. .,,'. '.. - - ' -' ',`- '` .:...V='-' -7 ' • - I ' - % i :^'" ' • - - ''. r' 1= - .... .... , .,..1 t ...1 ut ,41. ..„4"",, a". "', ... 1::::"."‘"-4C4'444'.***41 "*.* ''''' -A-L'n ' t'''''''''''''''; 'ft:'4 4544!C;' , ,...--fr., .„: .. , .,...,_ Parking Garage „ „,itt. .1- ..ttip,o Vi 4 4 ....-* , ::f ':. — 4.- :'4,1 ,...**;0 --. ,, '--4 „, r'' itf>,04- - --.4.- i.--x"- aer 4"--,...- .... . - .,.. rt),- ,-..: s f ,f44$ 4.4111.‘ ..., . r yi ,....7.,. '; F-1 , mai.: .1 =,..•,. . ,...' .. * ,,/7";;" , = fr_fi ,. .- . r V.:. „..- os„ - 0: 4.- ' 47,-4,:„.,,,;;•' , ',1 ' 2"' rt. ot / • • ,7,-, /./ .....„...:7 .i ../k.,.. lei ' i ,. ? 1• . J ....._, : -- ..,:y.-.. ...,,,,.--2' t; FEox rismtienrg:0ffiil CcheangeShop , ,to oingir , , -- .., ...... . , -,... ,„, .„,,......,„ „ ' , -... . ... . .... _ -9014 ".' ,, --.* - .— -"..... NSI _1111:: 4r. ',. .i.! • " 4 1111110 ' 4fs _, t 't -- ance Av . ,.., ,.. --„,..0 ,.._...... _....4, („m la. ......„ _..., _ , „,„, ... , -.....0 ... or iii - 1'115 i ,,:,,,tili ...._ . .. . ..... vitOtr,-4.5 1 --Willh 10,. 2 1 4F.T.. /xi_ ,„...0. 41440- do to J . kb-m _ . .,,, , /to - r '- • los New Elements of „ I Li•PA° i" ji \ , \ " . , -e- 1 Linden Hills Building . Tim - ., .., 1 1 . • . _ _ ____ . __ _ 1!:*3:4'1' „ ,. - _ ' ! — ° ,. ) a .....4.4 — .', .'' --'-- 1.0 ''.. , 4 , i 4 r —.MEI . 4 , ... r iED\vARD FARR A1 .0 ii 0. PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE 03.30.16 Aerial Photo ARCHITECTS INC NVES MENTS PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS 16.016 BN it 4 EDINA GATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave OR! ON IGATEWAY BANK r a . Site Plan Notes -1, _ * , .0010 ` . .�. 4528 -4530 France Ave Project Roof Plaza e' ; ' ., . 10100)001434. .} `� _ Proposed Building Size: 9,380 sf (combined) 1 I wee. * w e «,� � , ,� �* r � t� �; � , 4 Parking Provided: 47 Spaces a r 1 1t \Y � « , Parking Garage * , `' Zoning: PCD-1 (Planned Commercial) r Entrance " '" �' allk i h., 4. lit (24 stalls) s, fBldg Setbacks: Front 35', Side 25', Rear 25' N. - -5,730 SF Office Bldg �' Bike Rack `4 Parking Setbacks: 20' from ROW, Side 10' ,„ above ParkingGarage r " _ .&...* " . , g , ; :- , Max Building Height: 2 Stories ...44. (4 44! 4*- * ' - . .e i d I a am II I I I I I illig i li 101 i 0 0--L-0A07101 Mal% 411031 - 4763 r-lr'v . 4 : — tet Existin 452: Ys'41 ` _Aill ,, ,:9, ..:. ,,.; ,......0.7 ,,,,o,At tv:74,070:::„a ,......iii...14,,,,,,7,,,,.... g �`<� Building ` ���� �:� 3 650 sf 23 stalls (surface) • * +. to g // '`( _. . !rteN\It . , 11 ' '4;"1/.1''''1'. w `s�"+�t ',r.) 4���``c /1 r +a • ifriii 111111.11111 + � o *1 M.» 0 O 10" CQ? ti.'�.• rW O? taN.d. -0.'41c't it.=0 41 Yy , _ C Banking Drive-Up / Signage Landscape Buffer Enhanced Sidewalk ` France Ave 1144 . 1111111114.. 1\T . . u Schematic Site Plan Scale: 1" = 30'-0" 6-11\- - W PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE Site Plan EDWARD FARR Ala l OR' OIC GATEWAY BANK EDINA GATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 ARCHITECTS INC I N V, MENTS �x _,.. IAIL r •,.� • _ ,, ,, • illst '�J i--:1_,,,---:IT um 4 :iii______ r _ y, o c� �� ` n _ .•fir•, -------7-- --- --I, C/ aina.e=:klum_____mium: .rilism___ um is: III I -4110i7 . �_ E :1;:$6.1 _ mss' t�• �I,I � t��`C�,, � aQ�Q r.J :..tae "" 1!` i / — 'x.?,�4 - - - --- re ..,eR+.. ., °% .t-ate IL( . 44111101, Ili ,.: _— fr 4161.11* ti aNip► [11 �I 1.4111"'- - "...w.... w�,- yip ^�,. :1,-, p.,.,r,".._,,,,,1,,, ,,,,:, w „---- r,-. �� --- fir.- y. '__ - i 1 Jft$ì -44 ,..... _...,•.....,_...... 7 _ ___ ____, ,, _ ,,,H,--- _ __ ________, _.--„____ , __...... .. ___ _ ,„,„_ „ ,. . ,.., ..„.„ 4 4.4 _____ _____________ ..,:, � 1: Im- r"-• �1 ,.... _______ --= , __x--_ ------ ------- fr Aerial View Looking West above France Ave. i) W PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE 3 D View 1 EDWARD CARR A2.O ORION GATEWAY K EDINA GATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 ARCHITECTS INC INVFS MENTS �� r—.� ....tea.... — -- allraiko :,. ._ v -'WilligifiliaL*111111.1rE ,, z''-' _ - _ 5 -.k naw, _- Y^~ I 1 i .ai--------- .041,,L71_00 --i----.7r,_ imaiiiii yi � .� 1;.21.., 11 JrM i G�--,4"2,,re,.....:,i,41_,Allimmwititi____ ��: —""1111 r , \\ 1. -_—,_ so 11 a I . I. Al 111110111 \ _ , 'N V' ,. ,_ 1 if .:\\ ' N11.1 • ... — A� f cv ! .::r T----- 41111111*:--‘1:k '1 4 • \ f Zlit6 7 ill. o 4 y _ ii Aifir. r•-• , im,„ 0 0 —' a A. rJIr _i_------ ---7 1 kil , iiii _ . .6 ci,t Q1 er. _._,_.,-,- '5_._____----- _ .,__ lir_ _____-- - � .o '+i0— f, i { Ta v `� i { Aerial View Looking Northwest above France Ave. ,:\.) W PROJECT �RPROTECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE 3D View 2 E ` �`" AZ �1 INC EDI NA GATEWAY 4528-4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 ARCHITECTS 0 GATEw�,�� BAN I N V MINTS • g. M;—-- 4411111111111L ,,. •• tom-- r _ - __ :... __ _ .7:7: ,•., '��!__ I:i;�S .» i '�, .; — _- -— - "ice+ „, ,y.::- ” ..fir.. ,. r� ��,. 111H i 'VIII +--______ — ---- 11 -4rAN., .70,_ . — t,... i 1 it,„ lit. 01. iiii ii r „.__.,..,_, . ---- �� w1111t- ILI mo.,,, ,,,..____-- ., --74-u, ,� 11 < - w �. --;--- „„4,,,_. .. - ,, 1, ,. .. ...010 its '! r w ow .., 14 'ate ,- . . ` w View Looking East towards Roof Plaza Aerial View Looking Southeast .,--,a .0.:,,,,iii:.1 ".. .1'1 a sfi,,,,,,,, . 6.,,,_,‘ „, 1 sigit,,,,,e ,...._1,,,,,,:,...,:„.4,,,t - : ), ------ .7.,•i.._H' -1__-- --.. _ 1,.. \If , 4 . 11 • y a... _iffeo. L.,„,,„2,47.111,14,...iiitil.......lr .,_ . .,,,,,;:„.1., .....x........17-7, 4, ,. ,r • ' y r r �. I • .. NI 1 v ___ --1 `�.✓-' _�{ - .' a _ ,� ...– EMIIN — t � �, � I lig t�l��' ` 11111-m--- �� i Iii. o� fix. L Y x p W r 4111111 Aerial View Looking Southwest above France Ave. View from France Ave i 1, PROJECT PROJECT ADDRESS PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY ISSUE .? , _ q ".- 2.2 I EDINA GATEWAY 4528 4530 France Ave 16.016 BN 03.30.16 3D Views � : ; O R ON GATEWAY BANK : $., . MENTS City of Edina, Minnesota- Intranet: Council Creates New TIF District Page 1 of 2 .'4'\00e-0. ''y, ttr ''' ' ? 'TheCISof 4 EDINA w r1hr,,A.Ot, Sam Tuesday, April 05, 2016 Council Creates New TIF District By Scott Neal The City Council started their evening with a work session to discuss the future of the Edina Promenade. Staff presented the Council with information and alternatives for the extension of the Promenade north of its current ending at West 70th Street, through the Galleria and Southdale shopping centers. Council Members gave their feedback on the options to City staff. Staff will use the feedback offered by the Council to prepare new concepts for the Promenade that can be shared with property owners who are proposing new redevelopment projects. Following the work session, the Council met in regular session and made the following decisions: • Approved the purchase of a new ambulance for the Fire-Rescue & Inspections Department. • Awarded a $2.71 million contract to Palda &Sons for the Strauchauer Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project. • • Awarded a$2.76 million contract to Northwest Asphalt for the Morningside A&White Oaks C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction project. • Awarded a$1.56 million contract to Palda &Sons for the Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction project. • Approved a $41,000 contract with Freshwater Harvesting to remove aquatic vegetation from the Mill Pond. • Approved a$259,469 contract with SEH Engineers for construction services for the Tracy Avenue, Valley View Road and Valley Lane intersection improvements. • Awarded a$292,149 contract to Penn Contracting for the Presidents Area Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project. • Awarded $266,000 of miscellaneous construction contracts for improvements to the Braemar Golf Clubhouse. • Performed second reading and then approved a new ordinance that will allow the City greater latitude to sell beer, liquor and wine at City park and recreation facilities. • Affirmed the Edina School Board's appointment of School Board Member Randy Meyer to the City's Park Board. • Approved the City Council's 2016-2017 work plan. • Received a presentation from Project Coordinator MJ Lamon about the recent City Olympics employee wellness challenge and our great victory over our friends and colleagues from the City of Eden Prairie in the Border Battle events. • Conducted a public hearing and then approved the creation of the 66 West Tax-Increment Financing (TIF) District. ® • Approved a modification of the Southdale 2 TIF Plan that removed the future 66 West site parcel, and then added that parcel to the newly created 66 West TIF District. • Approved a redevelopment agreement with Beacon Interfaith Housing Collaborative in which the City provides$550,000 of financial support to the 66 West project. 1..++...,..//,.,71-4.,.- + 0.7;1-,.,,ti„, rrnr,/;nrlAv r,1,rr9aartinn=(`n„nail_mpptina-c>>mmaripcXrnrrirl=401 Sm._. 4/6/2016 City of Edina,Minnesota- Intranet: Council Creates New TIF District Page 2 of 2 • Approved a special permit for the 50th & France Business& Professional Association to use City property for the 2016 Art Fair. • Performed a sketch plan review for a proposed redevelopment of the BP gas station at 3901 W. 70th St. (70th & France). • Performed a sketch plan review of the proposal to redevelop 5901 Lincoln Drive to build a new 239,000- square-foot apartment building. • Received a petition from residents near Tower Street requesting a sidewalk in their neighborhood. • At the completion of the Council meeting, the Council met briefly as the City's Housing & Redevelopment Authority to affirm a number of actions approved earlier by the City Council during the Council meeting. Return to list. ©2016 City Of Edina, Minnesota i_ .__.ii__-`-- ]: /: ave ,l„.pont; .n=( n>>nail-maPtintr-ciimmaYiPcR�11YY1(3=4n�cRtll... 4/6/2016 PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S 0 N D Work Session Work Session #of Mtgs. Attendance Meetings/Work Sessions ....... 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 ..... NAME TERM Hi iH iii Hii Hi Hii iii iiii:;ii (Enter Date) (Enter Date) Hobbs,Steve 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Olsen,Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Lee,Susan 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1,1 5 83% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Carr,Claudia 2/1/2016 1 1 1 3 50% Forrest,Arlene 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 67% Hamilton,John 3/1/2018 1 1 2 100% 0 0% Thorsen,Todd 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Strauss, Gerard 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Nemerov, Ian 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Ma,Amy 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 5 83% Kivimaki, Peter 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers&attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held(ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded(ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type"1"under"Work Session"on the meetings'line. Type"1"under"Work Session"for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting" Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1"under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. "A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given,the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting.