Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 04-27 Planning Commission Meeting Packets )(,), PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT O ,t�gae epsbo.2 Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker April 27, 2016 B-16-04 Assistant Planner Recommended Action: Approve a 45 foot lot width variance from the 75 foot lot width minimum requirement as requested for a vacant lot at 5526 Interlachen Boulevard for the purposes of building a single dwelling unit for Thomas and Shannon Leach. Project Description A 45 foot lot width variance to build a new home on a vacant lot at 5526 Interlachen Boulevard. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND The property is a vacant "neck lot" located on the north side of Interlachen Boulevard and backing up to a ponding area. The property was subdivided in 1952 and has been vacant since subdivision. The ordinance requires a single dwelling unit lot consist of no less than 75 feet in width, (as measured 50 feet back from the front lot line). The subject property is 30 feet in lot width, 50 feet back from the front lot line and is 67,601 square feet in area. The lot provides a 30 foot lot width, so a 45 foot lot width variance is required to allow a new home to be built on the lot. There is no evidence that variances were granted as part of subdivision, so presumably the plat met city requirements at the time of division. A majority of the lot far exceeds the lot width, depth and area requirements, however, where the width is measured per ordinance definition is too narrow. The property owner is hoping to construct a new two story home on the main, (larger) part of the lot . The house will conform to all zoning requirements including height, setback and coverage. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes. Easterly: Single-dwelling homes Southerly: Single-dwelling homes. Westerly: Single-family homes. Existing Site Features The subject vacant lot is 67,601 and is a single dwelling unit lot. Tree removal has occurred on site as directed by the owner in anticipation of construction of the new home. A tree replacement plan and tree inventory/ survey data is attached for reference. A final tree replacement plan shall be a condition of variance. The plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Forester prior to building permit issuance. Engineering Review: Engineering has reviewed the grading, drainage, storm water management and erosion control plan. Engineering is requiring revisions to the plan prior to building permit approval, (see attached memorandum and e-mail). Any variance approval shall be conditioned on approval of a revised plan by the Engineering Department. Planning Guide Plan designation: Single Dwelling Unit Zoning: R-1, single Dwelling Unit District Building Design The proposal is to build a new two story home with an attached 3 car garage. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed Front - Average of adjacent Greater of adjacent Side- 10+ height, (living) 27/72 feet Rear- 25feet/50 feet pond 61 feet Building Height 2 1/2 stories, Ft 2 stories, 27. 8 Ft Lot Area 9,000 Sq Ft 67,601 Sq Ft Lot Width 75 Ft *30 Ft Lot coverage 25% .12.22 % * Variance Required 2 Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning District and complies with all requirements with the exception of lot width as measured 50 feet from the front lot line. 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. 3. The property is an existing nonconforming lot that has always been expected to be developed with a single dwelling unit. The existing lot pre- dates the current lot width requirements. 4. The home is two stories with an attached garage and should complement the character of the neighborhood. The home is within the setback, coverage and height requirements. • Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Section 850.0.Subd., requires the following findings for approval of a variance: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. 3 Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable given that historically the existing lot is narrower in the "neck" portion since it subdivision in 1952. The buildable area of the lot far exceeds the minimum lot width of 75 feet. The practical difficulty for the subject property is that the ordinance has changed regarding minimum lot configuration. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? Yes. A unique circumstance is that the existing property predates the ordinance and was not self-created after the fact. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new home will complement the existing neighborhood homes. Approval of the variance allows the continued reasonable use of the property as a single dwelling lot. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the Planning Commission approve the variance. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance requested, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. 2) The proposal would meet the required standards for a variance, because: a. The proposed use of the property is reasonable; as it is consistent with existing conditions. 3) The imposed lot width by definition does not allow redevelopment of the property without the benefit of a variance. Approval of the variance is subject to the following conditions: 4 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: Site Plan date stamped April 5, 2016. date stamped: April 5 Buildingplans and elevationsp p , 2016. Approval of a revised grading, drainage, storm water management and erosion control plan by the Engineering Department prior to building permit issuance. Approval of a final tree placement plan by the City Forester prior to the issuance of a building permit. Site must comply with the City's tree ordinance Deadline for a City Decision: June 4, 2016. • 5 f 9/-A'-lam �;Qw e r .1 DATE: April 21, 2016 TO: Cary Teague— Planning Director CC: David Fisher— Building Official Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer FROM: Charles Gerk EIT— Engineering Technician RE: 5526 Interlachen Blvd -Variance Review— Revised The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans and reports reviewed include survey dated 8/18/15, site plan and grading plan dated 3/28/16 and storm water report dated 4/1/16. Summary of Review The proposed plans include the grading and construction of an undeveloped lot off of Interlachen Blvd. The site work is adjacent to a wetland. An existing and proposed site plan was submitted for review as well as a storm water management plan. Engineering has no concerns with the plans as submitted, other than what is detailed below. Grading and Drainage See attached e-mail to EDS Inc dated 4/20/16. These issues must be addressed prior to issuance of a building permit. Storm water modeling will need to account for volume control of I.I" (MIDS) on site and a Type 11 24-Hour, 10-year rainfall for the rate calculation. Any increase to private property or the pond to the east will need to be mitigated. Erosion and Sediment Control No comment Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required prior to construction of the driveway. Water and Sanitary Utilities SAC and WAC charges will need to be paid for at the time of construction. Other Items A Minnehaha Creek watershed permit will be required. If the area of exposed soil will exceed I acre, a SWPPP permit from the MPCA will be required. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 From: Charlie Gerk To: "info(a�edsmn.com" Cc: 'TLeach(a�merchantgould.com"'Ross Bintner Kris Aaker Subject: 5526 Interlachen Blvd-Engineering Review-Variance Date: Wednesday,April 20,2016 3:20:38 PM Attachments: Jmage003.onq Vlad, It appears your proposed condition for Pond 4P doesn't take into account the proposed filling and grading as indicated on your Grading, Drainage and Erosion control plan. It also appears that your HyrdoCAD model has all the impervious space from the home directed to Pond 3P. The following revisions will be needed prior to building permit submittal: 1. Allocate the appropriate amount of impervious space from the home (based on the roof drip line)to the appropriate sub-catchment areas. 2. Provide revised grading for the western low point indicated as Pond 4P that allows for the proposed 100-year HWL not to exceed 924.86'. •, `" •' `+•.. Charlie Gerk, EIT, Engineering Technician-Water Resources e ' '-'i 952-826-0321 I Fax 952-826-0392 ll rk edinamn. ov www.EdinaMN.gov ce 9 �'� 9 @ 9 I ,( ),`, '..,..j .... ...For Living,Learning,Raising Families 67._Doing Business Tom Leach Shannon M. Leach 2217 W. 53rd St. Minneapolis, MN 55419 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West Fiftieth St. t Edina, Mn 55424 Dear City of Edina Planning Department and Neighbors: r '. My wife, Shannon,and I purchased the vacant lot at 5526 Interlachen Blvd,Edina MN 55436 to build a home and raise a family. It is a 1.5 acre"flag" or"neck"lot. It has a thirty-foot wide access off of Interlachen Blvd. for a driveway leading 175 feet back to the main portion of the lot,which opens up to about 300 feet wide. We understand that the lot was originally platted to be a single family home. Thus, it was always contemplated that a home would be built on it someday. When it was platted,no variance was required to build a home. Thereafter Edina's zoning ordinance changed to require that lots be at least 75 feet wide 50 feet from the road, in part to make sure there was sufficient space between homes and to build a structure. We understand that because this lot is not 75 feet wide 50 feet from the road a variance is now required. However,the lot is 1.5 acres,with the main portion of the lot starting about 175 feet back from the road, and thus there is more than enough land to build a home. We ask that the Edina Planning Department grant the variance to allow us to build a home. Before we address the specific variance requirements we would like to briefly introduce us to you and our neighbors. Shannon grew up in Fargo, North Dakota,but is a Golden Gopher through and through. She did her undergraduate and graduate studies in finance at the University of Minnesota and works at Carlson Companies. I grew up in Inver Grove Heights,Minnesota. I graduated from Iowa State University in chemical engineering and graduated from the University of Minnesota law school. I work as an intellectual property attorney at Merchant&Gould in downtown Minneapolis practicing patent, copyright and trademark law. We recently had our first child, a beautiful baby girl named Addison Leach. We want to live in Edina and raise our family there because it is a wonderful community with so much to offer,including great schools,parks and people. It is also close to work,family and friends. As part of the variance application process,we are required to address four specific conditions that are required for a variance from the zoning ordinance. These four conditions are addressed below: 1. The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. The requested variance will relieve practical difficulties because without it the lot cannot be put to its intended and reasonable use—a lot for a single family home. It meets Edina's definition of a lot,but does not conform to the current lot with definition because that definition did not contemplate"neck" lots. This variance is needed to address an issue that was not created by the petitioners, but due to the unique shape of the lot and a zoning ordinance enacted after the neck lot was platted. Thus, given that it is a neck lot with access to the main portion of the lot back 175 feet, a variance is needed from the lot width requirement. However,back further the lot is about 300 feet wide,which provides more than enough room for a single family home while providing ample space between other homes in the area. We plan to build a home similar to others in the area. Thus,the use is also reasonable as it was always intended to have a single family home built on the lot. 2. The proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not others in the area. When the area was platted into lots,this lot was platted as a neck lot. It was contemplated that a home would be built on it. Thus,when platted no variance would have been required to build a single family home. The variance only became required for this lot after the zoning ordinance changed. While the change does not affect most traditional lots and is designed to prevent homes being built on narrow pieces of property, it affects this rare neck lot. The ordinance does not serve its intended function in this case as there is more than enough space to build a home,that space is just back further than 50 feet from the road. Thus, a variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this lot,but not others in the zoning district. 3. The proposed Variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. The variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. The purposes of the lot with ordinance is to ensure that there is enough space to build a home. The lot meets the definition of a lot,but does not conform to the new lot width definition(50 feet from the road) which was enacted after it was platted. The lot has more than the required width to build a home,that portion is just back further than 50 feet from the road. Thus,building a home on this lot is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the zoning ordinance,which is to ensure enough space to build a home. 4. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The neighborhood currently consists of many single family homes. We plan to build a single family home on the lot and raise a family there. The proposed home is similar to the other homes in the neighborhood. Thus, it should enhance the character of the neighborhood. C Sincerely, 4\7 ` CJ Tom L �Q: SURVEYOR: NAME: Engineering Design & Surveying PHONE: (763)545-2800 EMAIL: tsemenova(a�edsmn.com Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood LO 2 Jackie Hoogenakker From: William Halling <halling.bill@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 4:23 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File B-16-04 We received the meeting notice for April 27 - we cannot attend. We have no objection to the planned entry driveway to the lot that borders our lot in part. Our address is 5608 Interlachen Boulevard. William and Dianne Halling 1 fiennePin Hennepin County Property rap ��w Date: 3/18/2016 . _ 1 9 1 j- I yyy - , 1 —moi 11. • — 1 inch =200 feet PARCEL ID: 2911721140009 Comments: OWNER NAME:Thomas Leach &Shannon Leach Exhibit A To Lot Width '' Variance Application �, ,. PARCEL ADDRESS: 5526 Interlachen Blvd, Edina MN 55436 PROPERTY TYPE:Vacant Land-Residential r -45-1eis, HOMESTEAD: I , . PARCEL AREA: ' 5 acres, 67,586 sq ft A T-B:Torrens MARKET VALUE: This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or TAX TOTAL: accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. SALE PRICE Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. SALE DATA: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 SALE CODE:Vacant Land Countyproperty Ma p Date: 4/21/2016 Hennepin m. Y a -tai{{,g 2 4 x 44 B 3} d '';':' ' ' .;,.441:41, r x '.; ,i. x #,� • }} ` x .''' .'i, ''''..)...,1 '-.::!:;i,t''if;'yj;'11.t'.,:,,,* , -',,,,'„,, ' 2 ' ':4;-: '' .- .4' 4 . —.. .-,%:,:':..i•''T.i:21i,:c' ...t.,,,'-.:',i114.-:-i'f.-;;;Itt,,::,:t.4 ''''' , .., .4-4).1-.. At,.. .., .ii,.-.:ii ,..:..k%,„-.,.... „......, . , , i ,4;r.'N:, .' .'.,,f; :....,,....:,- ,-Ir- , '' asp `� � � � r. `, _ e._ of � a, > k �{t r ..' "1;1...- *714C". ::''' j , * _ :st I � v 4. , , ‘41 -'',-.•' 1,:;,tr N. 4 , N 1 inch = 50 feet j PARCEL ID: 2911721140009 Comments: OWNER NAME: Thomas Leach &Shannon Leach PARCEL ADDRESS: 5526 Interlachen Blvd, Edina MN 55436 PROPERTY TYPE:Vacant Land-Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead PARCEL AREA: 1.55 acres, 67,586 sq ft A-T-B: Torrens MARKET VALUE: This data(i)is furnished'ASIS'with no representation as to completeness or TAX TOTAL: RIGHT©HENNEPIN accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(Hi)is notsui table for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. SALE PRICE: Hennepin County shall not beliable forany damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. SALE DATA: COPY SALE CODE: Vacant Land COUNTY 2016 CER � � / TE O � SURVEY� ACall 48 Hours before digging GOPHER ONE CALL _ ___ ® � "�� . NI 1�-.1--s i?-�`'`-t.,7_ _g L.e.i.9.e Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 / w 0 .�.i`,I'A I 5a�61 del ^'.\ 0 40 80 1 .. r Y"/Y�` 16 09 ♦• ! SCALE IN FEET NOO°3S'14• 175.00(P) a ir/+�•\c�•4 12;re 1 \ COMPUTED POSITION OF A� `•*' •� !©1 " CORNER FALLS IN POND •, A� // Att n1'�� -'0'2.:::,W',=..7..^ �. '^ LEGEND POND ,v4,�/sy7Ol 9/'yy/// '' w 0 DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON WATER LEVEL=913.92 Me, A*, 'ez0i ,�—. _ya, 0 .DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE AS MEASURED ON 8/14/15 �� 4#4,*2,4;,.;.:/,:;„..,„,-,v,'%f"� iy e ! - "--- — — DENOTES LOT LINE �.i0,� /;932 .-. —_ — /�44Vi ' 4i.R �" \ /—99. -'DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURELEVATION LINE ���� `]� ,''', ''./' ''413s- 'a 1 x999.99 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION lt_i'r�� ' / jii 3Ai °F�ifT.�.r,��i. '9 / .' \moi -----1 j— DENOTES DRAINAGELECTICOWW i�"4P•I nt������/ i// �-' r \��\\\� `�T DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE /44.d,%:iii<.� , f�T},GyOO,./7//i,, y3 ��` \ w —OE DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ' /Q./i�ii�/ _Asa- „ \Tp\ \ \ I —o—DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE • G�QI, ,/i,/ '1 -1,'-,3‘,- -- \ VN\ \ 5¶N4 \ —o•—DENOTES WOOD FENCE /lfA�' , ,-.7.-';',.."/i/ii' i •4 q4-- ,`TI Ir �lHOUSE 0 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE -r4- \�\�\(/ //'moi/'-' , ' \ \It \ © DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE S- .., �, 1,40% . �//j�/J--� �_-,-=—._� 945 \ \ \ 6- .. %r �$ - // \ \� 1 ••� DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT In /-3.70 f �0"4 / /,- -.\ \\\ \ I I DENOTES SOIL BORING N ! 1�fw'' ler4":46///'-i'" 9,,,,,..., \\\' \ I I �'.ff-y4yy I //rr/� \ \\ \ \\\\ i I I :I.9'5\/^\ v DENOTES SIGN/POST N. /j�'rl 01• 1'. /r , \ \e.'\ CI(Y OF EDINA \ �y .4. p / 'r 1/ �� \\ \\ l���\ > 1 I DENOTES GUY ANCHOR w �... �w Ij /k // / I \ x�-�-�3< I BENCHMARK 131012 %:- � /�y-,, �„� ... // '�// / I I f " ! I \ TOP HYD ANT=e3 38 (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE 10:4�:'4446.•l�y6 -4yi //�///i / / •''4. III ,,,, GREEN r�I I \ \\�� `/ / /E 1� I A °I �l (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE N.,,tG ' A-'//////' < / / III ASH 1\ /14" I \\\ �500'27•�4„E t .93(M/�74(P)/ / I ,�? F. ..‘,,,A.,..-_,...--,� �A s� I\ AM' G�N l\\ 7 16” 1 \ / , ' a (t 0/:7 'T , ' / �( w o ma DENOTES FLAGS DELINEATING WETLAND /�[';, L.,4�`3-G i/l �'9 � \\ \\ \� , ASHN r : I \\\ \\ l a l / 1‘/ O n ,�.1 IA '=' ��,gz`t12•' '3°i�%� "�'' \S \\\\\\,` \\\\ rte- a < 1\ \ I °'"1 i i " r/ `��'2 �\ o e DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER '�� 3i /_, ,� \\\\ -/ .11,E",0// I �, \ \\ \�x9 �/ ' � �w m o W MONUMENT(TO BE INSTALLED) ��,o i93 / I / \ • • \� ASHD I 0°' `93 ,93j`35..c e �// ,''''+31 m�t `_� i� 1 _�y/r /L \,- , `\ ;/�4,`l..._ 9•Y laa I__� B,� ��. 3q X93,... 4, r_9__� _.. /IZN U 4,5 1a ' _— \ 7J +j uoOUST 1�1 saB3tD6 ta$8° 4{P�- �� .. LEGAL DESCRIPTION �QQ /9y1(/ OI1L-_-____``-`\\\ •- �REL7d ,I?(` ___` Lot?BRUMS SUBDIVISION, _ ,4SH•\"{+EE I s'�2 GR�y IL_ ..:-......,...:.-,........1-,, \\ \\ //i /`�� a\ VISION,Hennepin County, /`�q /14-,/,//i%�'� \\��\�\ \\\\ \\I I I I 12D \ \\ \\ ```9gT`_P'•`\\\\\\ \ \\\\ \\\ Y// 1// H o Minnesota,according to the recur dPlat thereofF 1 /" ,,A ,///r/ /! \ eoNEYso°� \\\\� \ \,�ll� eLE ! w°;\ -9 \ \ `,.\\.. \ 'ZI , $/ *Ilibya\ /;/// GN \ \ \\ \ .ilVa \ 1 \ \ \ \ N. \ ti NOTES / ///o,,�,y, e// /� \ \\ \ \ \_T, y('\\ \ 1,,. !, co \‘\\,\\\ \\ I 1.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 1 / //// jc o,, / •\�\ \• \\ \�y'j)1`-1 1\\ y� t.,`, I \- \ \\\ \\ 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED // // /�/ //l .. \,RED \\ \ 1`) ,\ II I 1 I "'7!\ WI I � ` �,�' \ 3.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS / / / / //// wi O,dK \ 4...,\t,I A' I I I I I AMER1u N 1 O I ro "'" - ' '•-" �' SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. / / / /// / ___ '1? ,v,Y~).0 II I II 154 I I z A i / / 1/1/ / �/� -44g, \ _ ,V o\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I co /+5528 a'� 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER / //7 % / �� x \ \ T 1 1 I I III I I I1 I �f85T1NG I r/ w LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY /// 1 , j j / / I j 1 \I I I I 1 I II I I \ 1"8. - OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY /// 9 // /; / / I 11I^//� lilt 144,ya p c f AIRAGE\ 89.78 RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE c //\ �f/ �// / / w p.,`" bryryfiry ie qg a°a' 's q9 °i// / \ PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES 1 m °' of TO0 LQ %/1, ./If/ I 4j SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY / / I o e ,a - - -- - �,- a , -_ o' .��Q —oLIL ❑E —OE OE I II CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO N00'26'46"W 226.04(M) 225.96(P) 4- ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. ..F E.._N I 6I6 w 0 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION e I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPF^`"^HON, - II �" -'IGINEERING DESIGN&SURVEYING AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE 0' F.OTA. JOB NAM L: TDP.! LEACH FIELD WORK DATE 08/14/15 ,DRAWN BY: EP 'OJECT NO.: 15-108 ;'.T,' (• Wayzata Blvd.Minneapolis,MN 55426 ///� / /� - _.._ �. pR 17631 545-2800 FAX:1763)545-2801 1JeCM1I J�✓Y0.V Pk DATED: an/le/15 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD >1 ✓J E,.. ,nfeeedsmn.com WEBSITE:hl1p://edsmn.com VLPDIMIR SIVRIVER L.S.N0.25105 � I EDINA, MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 ^CHECKED BY:VS J ,CET NO. 1 OF 1 • , _� T Call 48 Hours before digging -� Y GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 4080 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 EXISTING MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 . • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE -_-- --- DENOTES LOT LINE 6 "DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE ' DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION �'I, B -4— DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW !.. ° - `D, DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ✓\ _ —0—DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE n' ! - —o—DENOTES WOOD FENCE . S' DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE e., DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT . _ _ . DENOTES SOIL BORING r DENOTES SIGN/POST F-F: �' \ `rzr .___ .._-_ _ __-. _.. ---I DENOTES GUY ANCHOR 1--� % (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE fF ,f \......'• - - (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE p ,�,�� ..E':' "10 --73`98-_ PROPOSED�---�1 � '. '!\ ` O5. DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE ! —>>—DENOTES STORM SEWER #5524, DENOTES DOWNSPOUT 1' ;! PROPOSED HOUSE ° DENOTES RETAINING WALL \/ TOB=93fi 28 0.M15ry" c+ - FLOW �' 1 X DENOTES TREE T-.4— DENOTES O BE REMOVED r :}° BASEMENT.92B.00 gs 4 N. �+m^ \ ! ° 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 27s \ I,_. _ 1 �' Lot 7,BRUM S SUBDIVISION,Hennepin County, 'Y § , m i' o� 'L'� \ L I:1 hl ,I�! I G Minnesota according t0 the recorded plat thereof, ! 5 I I to •, I " �E•2ye ,, ., ,i. I t = DWELLING UNIT ACKS .. ,- \M. / ., .. ,. .. - BUILDING HOUS DIN FRONT=E10.O ,:yy .' `✓6 ! n.A.O r: �r1�f _". _. I. SIDE=10.00 FT F � � PROPOSED ,r`v II' i _ �,.;' Yg A6 �. DRIVEWAY \, I REAR=25.00 FT a M. .1 66.15 F RE '6�'4•,= 6 \AS .,i•,?4+9_.._... ', ,-. .. EXISTING HARDCOVER a ADO m 9 Y6. s„ 0 _ r _ AREA :I 938.` `Y60 .6 ..65 m10 U �� t —� SQ.F ( 55A ) ' l 44 FN � TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0.00 SQ.FT. �1a a4 Pomo'14.6'';94 0 '° �`4 Y-•'�A� . .. .. __ B". II I, EXISTING HARDCOVER 00%1 T. 1. C. 827 5 \ PROPOSED HARDCO ER i! • Y6.7\ 1 I R Ii PROPOSED HOUSE r Tera: }, ,n I ?� . - 'I PROPOSED CONC.SURFAC:Ne.ifiicgLg71 ^ _t 3 4 T09 }, '4.:.'''''''' i _ `l I Ii TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA :rT:cRYo, ! ,1� 'c•.o' / ��, .,.I,r •` I 1 - - TOTAL LOT AREA 4017SbY� . 5 AC:) ! ! 1' ` _I ' \. r I 1 PROPOSED HARDCOVER iKWj4' • !2s I�' NOTES P'.1_ i I'; t0 I II �tQ - t.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. ' + --#5528" Ik'J 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED PeR 3.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS ��N�^� I I I I - - SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. r'K.: ------89:76-------.- 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER _JER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY ! OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY �L _s. L O. N RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE __ t I I n�� I PRESENT,VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES - IID I�I SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY II CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO II ANY DESIGN.PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. 5 CONTRACTOR SHALL VFR la-BROPOSED EI ATIONS. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT MIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, JOB NAME TOM LEACH ENGINEERING DESIGN&SURVEYING AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF TIE STALE OF MINNESOTA FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: EP PROJECT NO 15-100 I�j(_ FIC:17 I Blvd.Min Poli.,1 5 55426 I I / ' i/i` L �\IJIf OFFICE:17671 545-4600 FAX.17631 A 15421 /�4r1 J<✓Y<I�Fl�r DATED: 3/38($018 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL:infoendsmn,rom WEBSITE:hup://edsmn,com VLADMIR SIVRIVER L.S.NO.25105 EDINA,MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: ED5-13 CHECKED BY:VS SHEET NO. 1 OF 5 II' fil?d I h" 2 1 .,r C. � _ �y w ,iE N. U is i �E�9` £rN Em� w 3 l'i{ — d4 @ 6 r rll E i g' ill amm,-8da 4 °€� � a _ �YS i3 § m R1i1 91,11 N z 0 F U D V ei; Z J' \\\ h,\\ ddb O \\\ \\ \\ '.+ �\\�; IIIII \I\\\\--. /\ O \ \\\\\\: \-\\'‘‘ _.. I \ Ilrl 1111;;.L1)1 lli w \I I \I \II \ I \I I1 l\1.1 ) 1 1 1 1 1 it N 1j111 U 1 ' l I I \ / ! , li{ l. F fill fiiIrt/'1 ! z J // / i III i li f{ ^),1 �iil ii i�II�Ir�1 II' O /' / i/ s// '' Il'Nr Illllh 11 'iib 0 Pips:///iiiii /pp —'///i �l/j/ ////// /f,va i 1 7a i f/'11/dill l 111 111111 `�\ w. / '/ ( /"ill( / I I II 1111(11j1 llrlll `�\ S ,( // II/ I( I 'p// / II 'III II Illnr Ilrnl v � ,,/,_, ,' ',11 I 11(; / 'y�I lV''I II ,Il lillu ,I,ui `'\ `\ m \ 1\\,,.,EI1\/ E I 1 III ii11�� ��'J �T/�-'� 1 t,\,,,\\ �� ��� a) LI V�. 1I�1 1i 111\I 1111111��II�I ��\ \`1 `` — >/ ' �, a A 'il'i1 j11Il IIIIII II1 )I II � y qp Ill 11 1 11 5 C\ ^‘,.:.- ^:1:-`\‘‘ 't\` e , 11 9-- '011\\It 11,0h1 \ll l\11111 WI t.g5 \\S^ �� \ > ' \\\\\\\,1 11\1 \11 , i `� \�\\�_— Ii. I\Irl \1\//\\\'FII\IIF,II I,ll\Il / x y, h I i? \\ \\ F\1\ 1 I,\)\\\\ 1 , 1 ,‘ \ ;;_:v`\a h ', \\ \ 111 I/\i\/\ \,1\ n\ \\ _-S-L:1 -'\‘‘'.---- /ii \ 1\ II \ 1 \� \ ,ii , \ `I loll �III1111\ j1i\\ill /\ I \`\1 �� / I Nil)) 11111111IIIII\\\\\I‘!I\ o ~1 fie` 1 i fel 111 1 11111111\ \\I\1\\ --' 7. i r I i 1 `Ilii i 111\,1111\\\\\ \\1\\ / // -7 ,q ���� -` , i i 1'1Il li�ilvilli\y, 1V,Iv / ! _,,.,,4? _,\` t'F- ) II III Il 1111 1111`\ i f ;/-..„...,..:•,.._,2, , ,,,....., ' ``\F \ \ 1 'IN', I I 111111 III\, $i i /__/ f �\ '3 II I I I \ \ \ i0 I I II111 1.I1 \ / N I II I II w , �/ /, ), \`------- . 3 I I i • 111 1,,I111,, 111 '\\ _ I I � I \ 1111 I \ �to ,' n t-- --- - l l V 1 � IIIIIL,II �I \II\ \ \ I!i ,/.1 /- ---4 ----'h 1I� I1`111111111111 + + \\ \ mfg �/- rn\� l`u\F // /\I\Il\1+\\\ \\\ \ \ Ili / /'//I' ' .�\ , \ 17/...„..///,,,,„\f1 \\ 1 \ \\ --/z/././, \\ '''',/ 2,',0 I \\ //'�i \ -,,,/ \ /// ,/ \\ r y V /'7/� 1 y'/ \ °2�o \ __----,// I / I§ y a n i i eA 1 // \ / / ``` .Y\ \\ ggj I \ Slit au x 1-1 9 111 e® 3st° A $ R—astes I : it 'sili�`i €. u 15 k g Ngill , . E, . , , 33 881 N a ,ll F : irg i 3iii u'1 Fill 1 5l Ie W a N III 2 0 F U D V to Z O U tt J� O A 0 3 B A A e B A A 9 �N6 , I— i / / / / / / / / / ( / , 111 / I / ` :'I1 I 11, Z --->1---"--j V _i i i / / / / / / / (' ' / 1 I 1/ 1 i/I/�// r / /TV / i i i/%/ / i i / er i \ 11 it i,ii 1 /, II' i i lld . 'c / / / / %1� 1 / ,' � ,3 ,6 I / / i,, i ii 1, ,i iii , w / '�( / / / / ' , I 1 I II 11111 , 1�1 , III,F iI z 1 l 1 ( / , I " I I I I ,1 1 1 1 I I, I 7. / ,' , I I / ( / I�py. I I I 1 1 1 I I III 1 1/ I , 1 I j I. / -`-/ , / I I I I ( , / 7 / '�- I1I I I 1 1 I I I III I I, I I 'll- V I 1 ( I I i ' / ' I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' I U / . / I I I 11 11 1 1 11'11 ( ,j 1 /I I 11 I I 11 � 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1,,j F / / I I \ 1 1 1 1 I$ 1 Y j ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Will II �11r/ f 1 1 1 \ \ t \ t\ ` \\ !E '`1 i 1 1 I I I I II 1 1 1 j 11 I w i,i / `./ __,'' I\ I.`\\ \\ \\\ \ \ \ 11 A j �I I II I� 1 ' i 11 I� III 1 I 11111 V b\ \ % 1 \\ �\ \\\\ / 11 1 1, Il I II I I 111111 II 1I1I In \\ / / . \ \ _ \ II I 1 1 1 ' 111 1111', I1\ \\ y. i `. \ 11 I ' 11 11 111 I 1 11111111 \111 , III I'1 ...\\)/'''--- \) \ --- ' / / \1\ I I ; , 1 I , ,III ,1 I; , \ 8 1 f/ 1.,§ 1 ;Ij I\ i 1, I I 11 I I 11 11 1 I I I 1 , 1 \ ( 1 1 i ', I I 1 1 1 hit ,1 1 E .\ . — j 1 d \\\ 'I I '1 I, ' I ' 1 '1',I 1 I 1111 'I ph _L `W� 1 \ \ t , I ; I \ II\I I I 1 1 1 11 1 ti � . — \ ` , 1 I a/./___J jI / \ 1 1I \ \ \ ; 1 \ 11v 1\\ '\ 1 111 1 1 'II ` \\ 11 ' , \ , 11I , \ 1 1 \ \1 1II/ / 11 \\ \ \' \ 1 \\\ \\ I' 11\\\ \\\\\ d6,Z. ��' I ' \ \ 1 \\ " 1'111 \ \\ \ w� , w I � / I t\11 I\\1\ 111\w. , 1 1 I \\I\\\\ I\ a '4. —\ \\S, 1, '3 z.m a. ' 111 •r^jD 11111 \\\,\ \ YYR I l is, ` I; 1\ 1 1 \; I 1\1 1\ \ q u@ ---'•‘. /' ` — _ "; ' 7 ` ` I I I ' 1 1' 11 , 1 \ 1I 1100\ \\ 6W" `\ II \\1 It I I i i it III 111 I II I li I 1 It\'\\\`I \\ m \\ . ` \ -=� ---- \ 11111 II I I I I,111; 1 \\I\\ \ \ \. - % __ r- 1 ` I I I I , III II,'III 1 I I ;I ti \\ 1 \`� `\ \\ \ti✓� �� I \ 1 III 1 ' 1 11 I I I I I I 111 I\I`\ I 1 .\ S,a' .\\ \ \I \ 1 II I 1'I 1I 1I 11 11 II III 11 1 I II 11'111\'1 II �`\ ` -\ ` I \ 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I 1 \ ' `. $ \ r; I \ 11 11 , I 1 1 1 I I , I , 1 \ 1 s p i*\ 1\\ --I .\\ II1 A A ; \1 y1I I i i 1 11 II II I I 1 11 II '1 I I\ \111 I -` 1 . I , I I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 \ ' 11 -` I ``\\. I • I . , I I I I I / / / / / 1 1 11 1 , 1 1\ II \ 1 ' ISI I I I \ I I 11 \ i , ! '\ i 1 I 1 1 11 I\ I\1 II I'I ', I, 11', \\ II 47;;:,74:„._-- r\ l I ;oil '1 11 ' 111111 ; 1 ' ; • 1 111 \ h I 1 \111 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I\ \ 1\ 1 \1 -- -\ `\ `, i _ 1 1 j 11 I I I II , 1 I I 1 i `I 1, 1 \1 1\\', ,' y' i `�• _ - -- - i '1 I d 1 1 1 11 I 1 till , . II 11 1; I, 1 1; \I\'1 _Y ' - I I 1 ; ; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,\ \ \ ', 1 \\1\ ,---..„,/,./ 1 ..--- �L ,1 1 I Li ' I 1 I I 1 , ;1 ;1 , I+1 \ ' rr ��-- \ --` , I 111 1 1 I I 1 1 \ 1 ; 11 I I I ` ,' , , `. --- — / 1 III 1 1 11 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 / , ` \ — IC / / 1 11 1 I 11 I , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 / Y :�`` '`\_ .� — \ r--' I""' \11 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 , \ 11 (' H`\ \`-,7 \ 1 1 I I `I I I I 1 1 1 I I I \'\\'l\\ /\ — --------�" % ' \ � / � I 1 11 I 1I I IIII \ A' --_ 4_--------------- - I\�I I I I H II 1 I 11 \ \\ I \\ / ____ _----_ . 1 I I 1 I i 1 1 l 11 \I , I \ / - ----------------- ----� I dl I II. 1 1 1 I I I 1 11 \ 1 I \ / y / �� _ - --- `� I ^`jam I I 1 1 I 1 \ 1 1 'I \ ' ___ I / V. I 1 I I '\ \ \ \ \ `\ ' \ / .y II I 1 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ 1 \ \ \ / 1 \ \ \ \ I \ 1 1 ,,''11/4 / I1. 1,-_./ , 7./ / / , , I \ \ \ \ \ \ . / \ i i/ 7 i 'i,'i i / ) \ I 1 1 (131.661&! mm mm�mnnnmm� t A�nimimniniiMil 1 livid mini ��yym�m� "o ma nl1Inrlrl■1■lnn■nuI■nI■ In... 11■1■nnlln■1■ n1,..■.....171■n■ur rn rirrrri,o, SHEET INDEX�� rrnnln■■nn■I■I■I■nr1A�I■n1 n lekl■nl■I■n �' 1.),T iT■u.. n■nlln r■rnrn■rinnnnn ■nn■m nfw■ n► mrm■■mmmnmm ■■Ir■■mml■mmn �Iunsunlnl nn�►mmrnummn�■mmm�m■nl■wnmrm■m wm■ ,- n nm Imnul■n I■nm / .nm■mm m■nul■numnn■nn■m ►rnnn■ mm�m■n■ nn.esH=E, nmu 4 mulm■n mm�ml■ .,.,r ■n n■an n■mnm■umn■ Im r r■mn■ n a,,,,, Amon umm i■nnmumn■mun ',. �� S- mmn nnm►Iww ,Fti noon m [LAN air -r:iln ■:r nmI■mmm� 'RULLWa' ■m■ml moon■ :nn m.■■Run �E,..� I. mmn =nlrnmm�mm■mnm � ►rmnn nnmm nn m um■min _ Pa INN I.EvEL RAN ■wlnn •Imum■m■numnnnn m■ ..loomnmn o n■mnmm�mml Inn in rmnm �n■Imm�nl■Innnnny nl■�inn►■mnrnmm Ti.il■ia mm n■ a ■■mumnl■nn n■I n In■I■nn u■I■n■nrun■um■nu __Fir_ rmnmm�lm■ A5 TOPER LEVEL PLAN nrm u n n■mmm�o w.� 1311 lmnulr■I411 n l�numin nnrnnl■nmpir ,iI �l.l�l'+I� , IIII .0;triN■nm■n■on■ i iii l■nnm ■ ,9 ® �e,,,,,,ns urn■mnm■nm■ n pI■�il�l �s:iu■Iil�inil�Iiiil�iii I _ i E �`mmmmur�mmmnnt� ■u■ uI kabala, �■ i,.■mnnnnmmmmm un n �E'"� II moon. mm3um n'iulmnnn� 1nu■I■�n■m"Sri' I r nuI■.m■n1n�n1 ■n m 111411141446114141416711 ■n■I■m■n141■'■I 4■I"rn■rinn■ II■1■1■Irlia n■rlln '` II'. ' 1 fa■mnnnn■1,■n■li -'' inn IS ■m V a A.9 �Rp I■mnmlmm ■m(�inn I um■I�....._ mnlrmlm mm ■m►r mrrrmnnn nn nnnrul■mm BUILD,.SECTIONS WALL "� ��,�� �■rr5mnmunr°on�l■ .mnnnrmnun■nmm nmI rnn�� I nmm�l■nm■nmm"in�nlii a mrn mmin rl urnnmml■uml I nmmnmumm�nnm=inr■nm .. . ,n■ nl■mmn■mn mnnmmVA": n ■Imumr ni_mnnmm�■r■mr11 nn■mn■I■m■mrinnu■Irll5.ti mnn■nnrn mm nm n�..� uwnnuiuliuiiui�iluuiuWn■�' � mum■rmm�nnn■�u■mmm�rmnrr■irn umnn■� ��a ..***""'x�• n■I■I■ImlIMMU In■■nl■n Imlmnnl■m■mnmMISMIN n■m I■111■I■.1711■I►WnnEMEMIN2Mil i Irl■nmm�■mn.m nm■mlun■nnlm ■Inlmnln == mlp,tul■nIm■2 nlr■n rlmu�mum■.n■nqm��m�;!I!ri■!ue:nnu■m■nlunmul■wur.�. ,�1.=.'.= .�mmmnr►nm.um■mmnm■ nmrnrnn■nn --,:_I ': II „,,,,,,,-,-..-,,-.11.:,,._,,,,.1.,,,-- ,. a '= I..:- :” , III i ;I.. 1:1:11 : II I I I I II _ I I I I - I - i I I -il _ I_ 1 II I I,.. ll I - 1 d - I I- I::I I I:I. L-- I •• , SOlffl-1 ELEVATION I —i PROJECT TEAM fin Iinilinliiinliiinl�iinlniiiiiiinliili■"mi'na niirir mar 5-7----,4-- ) Irl■111■I.I.rnl AR ....T �In.■r■mmn■ n■nnumnm■a■mmnw■mnmrnu■n nm anniO1. - wmu.■II■■ pgmm■munnurmu.mmm�umnnnn■mnnmun nig*'. 4: ■.el■ uliri�'-[�-��■rlmnlim-7,-01-141----m— mi �.� n i'1.nmm■un►nl■nnI■nnmmmnnnnmmnnmm�Rl.nimmnn• J trill;oon .=. ,-nlnnll■Inrlrl■Illrmu■ n■nlurn■1■I■n1u■n■n■■1■Ingo{■n■In■■1■In■n1■nln6•��Inp■Irnmml' .r n:S==_-y� �*.n-=? ���■mn t rmnmmrn■ni IiUM\IIrm■rn%■lnnr■m11111 1rinn■In■nlnr r . ■hitt I_.:-:S-ti._'- .::=Eel `Inrnmrnl■nmmmm■muni■1►nlmnlr.:Sm��mn�I��r�m�rin �i ■enrinmr.�aiZ_v{?.-^�'_fs=r'sn■nun _L� 5TRIILTURAL ENGINEER ■1■mm�mlm■nnnnnmlmn■Inn■ '•J •• -• ,moor n�ll►umnnnnmuumnnn►nlml � •• ._ _ _. � unm+�uinininnnnmin �ini e_ �.�mnummmmlmmnnmmn• ��mmn mmnurmolmm�m■n; �a B .. I� �S.CTRN rg � � :• I nnu■■nnn■mun■mr�mnnurl■ � i ■mm2mu■mnummm�e c r ' * i nI■m■airffium■ m ■nrr mmmnunnmm�mmmm- ' 'i$ ..n' 'I i r1�"r �� �. f j �1nnmlmmmnnl■mmno,. •'�St I.► , �"l nnminunnunnumril.islurlm � GENERAL GONYW.GTOR I� � •, I l , ' ,1 I IIImll�■n gild nnmm■■nulm■nn KK_ �umnnnnn■ n mmm f' �- ml non•..m�rmnnn n mmn � A -rl'r' S, r.,ver`, h m Irm■■Inummnnnmwmn■I�nnnmunnnn■m.� ♦S".��, ' •' I� Y.� i � .; _ - ■unlmlunmemm■I■■umnmuu ..�....,.�nnnnn■nmmm. Si L nnn■umm�nnnm■mn�I114111115717r1"‘ ..;�r.�.ulLlwl_ ,'1194 �L;�' -- -- ■I■uulrl �.o..m. IlnulnNl■nrlT7� ',�-. L�::�� - - -' �ilniluil�iliil�iunnlnnrnnnnnrinnrnnnnml =• nmm�um►n ■i. mi:u ._- 2 b }{' i I umnmmmm�mm�nr ml ul■nnv .Lm..a. it-'"• 'i -'^'4-L'P. � L' n � nnmu■I■uul■nnl■lu■`uuuulrnmomnmm�m IssueD FOR ..:��... �, . SIL YT - d. , :". Ino■I■nm■mm�u■nn4uulnu■umm�nnnnrum -- nm}nnnn' ..:Ih::r.�'Y::�ISLI' iit 7l','ifr '' ;01, --1 L`. ■Imul■lunnunnunn■nnunnnmm�mmml = _I Annsi _ _ _ _ _ &44..i 7 � -.,-,E,:11,�, L ;_gmwmiun�n�nnunlfu.Iu..un.n�Inn.mm:c l'" . ileL� iil ir+.+ �I t� — 66i-12 . i�frT; rf ]Rj n �� ��� IW: �IIII I� II I A bell, V ''� ��t1j� I a f 7ti�2rf 7 i {his SSSS: if ': ::I_ l'o ,i ', rt G F }� e 1 ku L'L d4 5L . NIIi� ,t qq n -, rv}`' �, ill 741R lul �owEa L'''L il' c.......... , • NRTH ELEVATION LEACH HOME OwOa ED NA.1-1•1 55436 • SHEET A7 NUMBER SCHEMATIC GONGEPT-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION .—.. -..-. Ili i , 2 mrlEii i ? 4 4) 2ll 1111 N E _. l/i3 ITu•3 d t @ N 1 g$ jI iO g ® !�1 q. 3� a8282YaPa 41,in w : i n ofi 'I' �I �$ ; 1h r°4, m. -�lo p �nIQ 1 ,4 z ' is 11 , . _ zome ,;1:1 II ce-E _• _ .1..-;-.T. - `,. IF-1011., -� W Gi�0 _] Ili* ��� z IiiIIIII:11.01:::3"imi GA t 1 1 - - ' sl/'Gl.I ^�1 � _ il ■G�p• 1.'1 1IIon F.el--E_:=C -G � ti. -prGC=....,- . -_s.'_r r II jil 31 dee :ittalisgas ;E1=E i - 01.11.6iE■,tla.0. G GIG, ■ a■ ;1 e ■ ,,Ari! — :E BF-_''•-E_ ?:: �� 1510$10M _,liftlitgi a"■= is E•=['.-2=e eE:_ S- ■. .. -Gt1X - Bei e_ 1GC--., ■ ■ I h 11'''`•!1C•1';i�. ice. - .- ■GG-.G- �- : 1 i• _ ;11111 1 aG� Y r I C �E- �14 N JI 1. 1 F _ •■_ ■615.1_. 2 n 1 ii iill {a -L--�_-p, l�.,a;,li�' E�:� ■ .L/.■ {- i - �l:�ieE_EE_ � .L11;2• 1141'R'y{ E€lii�K;1{1� I fa?ti'?g hi■�1 ti ��fi r ■ alit'" ti e' o--• _ ECG-$�I AI 11 1 1 y■r '.1'■1}11 h 12■1 j. - _ _�=i-r I ,_. _-..1i".�.•-.t2ti:6. -. I PPRIY i!ti ■1J.i-.:1 —e■x0.■ -15-1 7 EE ' - I� ©— '� 1. 1 1 I 1 •• -31.1113001:11i 1!r�i4ir illi _ 5: it .:-' _ 111114-'4---7+.1;:-''- 1----1:-I1r1 ■,-« 'i - ., r•!i. �- 1�. -1_r�� � •...� 'mss. 514!' •1 ti :e1 CGI 1l 1- bell will r- l 1,.. Ee G r ,; '• �: � iiEli I t ) i -rl I = - iA5.4.3- nY'I-7,-,ani J:�.• EI/ ■ z . ini` B E;Iii','11,4.1'i' r o- rr.::: -.ti - - G ila! it 1_.=''?_•_:mac °e' _:'1=••:.r _ idhad j4I'h.' {':•••_f-liti:,'i:: _ _ ..: _ i<'r'ri1�.`N, -�' \v-v-:1-:.-.-y 11�l;11�if 4: :±e:.N :=e, '-'-'141-'-.-:": _ - - CE'' gl ftii ,.g __ :---- 7~_`•••����:�■{.■?.sem_ _ • �i;.:4{!j:ri i' ?r jGi-;"-1-i ::�G = - - - 1^igji0d�1l1 Ali 1! '_____''!;k;. • '•r• $±N0.g1 f 1 PLI,.,1 Y.. 2 E ii f;"•/' iN'-' .iE�l.r�!gi liY.Ak� 1,Yc� -- I. '''ill J ;■ ehljlihtil reilli?a; :i i - - ;e•146:4%il':!iii ''S:'50. - ::fir _- i ig :ai s !%'ilii G i gi - - .•Illi.'r'l'''i! ■ml'aneGa !'E!%i:j;'/1./.y _ :- a.-1i;u%ai.ilipill .•_ 'ru .1 aligioriiii/itill : 41 '1,6 Nl,�i. % O4b■ i 1 i_ rnl • CMC-C-ppEE��G.GeC ..�EE�G- ■■ 1 1':�_. r [110- te•■-• *WmuC! / / - ■ _ G' :EE Epp IrCa�" r ■•i:j.ii:'1„/ _ r,tarragon 11 1.>4 1_c.�1 . +1igi L.1111 ■ I�� r / � J r 1 ■ ■ � • � �� 5 y .a .rgr 4 r■1 it i//`'!P !iii! �i ii i i 1 - lalea1L '1r �uB■, li ,..„,„,....61....,,,..„....,4l •Sil1 "'�■■U g,11Y X11 , `'1gc ! ! -: _oln - _ Ge■1- 1 I!F% ___'=1 1.1-1: €:��e■E a �- .K' T-- �.:, e.{J_. _ _ GAG-- ■-- ■ Ge r : _:E.,,-44,74;igitil 11-.'•;!-;"--'. ,r,.5.-E57,' `� �.I r I 1 r 1 y it h■1 1 _ :� i. G-.Gi G ■ I 'i' I ,. ■Ai3iii iiiii■n■1aniiii i'ah■p I: _ :jG�_•,,r_j�EpG`.y�. GE_■e■� !!f��.�.'I' '^•4r- ■`'1;i;�ij■ratii'I.yh� 1 - - •-GEGEE .a �■�_. .�, a r1 __ •: -- =_fig-GE •_w. Z'^ginieC�€11:■= .� . 11 = i E.E_EEE�E ei !'I! ■I G 4 =C . 1.-___---- - 1 r . _ i 11 ...,.i•le °►!' .e:E_G.E ■E .11,F.wx`' _ y Imo,1 I i .,, 1 . . 1 i , i i ! . , i MINEM ui III pgAy Z O ® O g Z dam/ O 8 �i : m v= � G •112/ 8 N Q�Q s� -41 .• Pi N Eg oF3ppks+y gn 4 J aW = lQ t! i'.k 31 m :1553Sg as N c F. u 1 �z b ►��� U 1 m w t,u 4 3 a.i t, c l9 Z k. �'« aF'; t r I a U I IIKa LL474r ��►�� . _ i D - '� r 1rJ 9 fin03 �s■ F z i LI) s ■ ; u w o PIDi z PI tLia `r 2 Ott N a� aYh tr _ U1 I y i14 4 I r ,i a i ti ' A,.,kik Ittorl.„‘ ,,i, . it. 0 ca & � r , FIf , 4 l9 Z , _ `�" Call 48 Hours before digging GRADINGD RAI I \I' ,A\ E O I COI ll O L PLAN GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 0 40 80 Z Q MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 LEGEND SCALE IN FEET EXISTING .) • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE \ "1''''8' '- --- DENOTES LOT LINE / I I- -- --DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE 1 �� ', ,, 'i DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION ,\ I • '* DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW // 1 - '0 DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE 4' I • —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC • ,�:I —0— DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE I ] I. —0—DENOTES WOOD FENCE C] e DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE -- !�c✓ I -C1 © DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE p ' -® DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT ��--yy W 1.. DENOTES SOIL BORING F-- 7`s I- v DENOTES SIGN/POST r P m, cqL 51T FFNOF® �a,96-- E— DENOTES GUY ANCHOR Q CM) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE I- I D DISTANCE / y _ - -_ \ - (P) DENOTES PLATTE y`y©.LO �'�"' I - I, #5524 �I PROPOSED wiN\ b1�1'1 I I- DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE OSED HOUSE l SI-- o / �n FFE-938 56 <161 •, bD� � I II 1, j - } DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE ..... / Q roa=93648 r - T� I !C \ ...j...Il I ® DENOTES PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT ten,• �L / T- �, 6 \ I ry j----� „ Ixxx.xl DENOTES PROPOSED GRADE y' xA BASEMENT 92600 �s ,l I-7 G, \ .� 4 ,, oa 2 4 •] _ •- - X DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED (- /;`_ qqt � V. - • ` {[ ® I! DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS ` �� 1q m 0, ,,,,,..: "{ I \ ROCK ENTRA,C /7J y \ -tY/ 6 i # t I I. I 1— DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ..1.‘ 9 4. / ><d�� 159 n. - �> :( G . ;• I I �isisii DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE '.4k.' \ 'yy T"d m- : uc I�1 I__ I _ --_,IL © •mss_ -I 'L=•y 'k �' ® PROPOSED \ ��},,�� 0,946. ORry OSEDc B>� sqT i p,� ""� {gpL}- DENOTES PROPOSED SILT-FENCE Y" '1 wCa I•Fi'� `bn. r SII. ' > P,Y •� ` 3� "" DENOTES UNDERGROUND STORM ';I ctv ftE `69 �66\sm SOU ....,.°. u I• .7 • 6 'w:/ft I DENOTES RETAINING WALL • , , O- OWE ''� W , v_ ® 1 44 • � { ! 938. r 8 5 - N,w®w•.� ® /• • R NOTES m- .; 4Y1 ' ,? 4u _..:.aw 92B.Q_ 927 a\ �, d4 - '�A. 4.11 \�120 _ a �I I / c bBi•>, '- '�� (' `() I N 1Q PROVIDE SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF SITE / '' rW 9240 xj7r t/ \\\ 'rt gcTF� BW 926.0' 2 '+c n \TYPICAL SILT FFNs`.Fn t ' w _ ` M{�1'�J��M {• 1 C� l I I,i PLACE SOD ON DISTURBED AREA YJBAc 6?�.4 b SIG + 3 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE y1 3 c�J4 I,a1M I II j' NOTES �n 11, II h I 1,THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. t I t It.,4 \ � 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. II-#552(3‘;‘ I 4.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS I SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. "' I \' I I 5.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER 4,1x1 ----- LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY j j] OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY 1, S______�Q 10 A n\I_._n -.__a a 1 I EJ RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE • - C=.0=_- _. J' ! PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES - SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY _. TYPICAL 511 T FFNCF®-J g I • CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO I N I' L' Ij ;.i ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. ENGINEERING DESIGN&SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SU4 ISISOON, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME:TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 I= I GABS WT731'4'51‘16 Minneapolis,MN 55426 t 'LfJ�l OFFICE:11631545-2600 (7631545.2801 �TPta F/ 5'�,Y<�Oi' 3/20/Bo1e LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL:in IAOndsmn,com WEBSITE:htlp://edsmn.cam VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S.NO.25105 EDINA,MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO,: EDS-13 CHECKED BY:VS SHEET NO.2 OF 5 T A GRADING NOTES 0Ep I�__ 1 I 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC Y / ` l.-a FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF SITE GRADING.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 2.SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL DEBRIS.ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL.STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR NOTES: FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. - PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6" (153 mm) DEEP 3.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO TRENCH AND BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY. EXISTING PAVEMENT,THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE - POSTS SHALL BE: EXISTING PAVEMENT. - 4' (1.22 m) ON CENTER 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. '.. - 2" (50.8 mm) X 2' (50.8 mm) HARDWOOD, PINE OR 5.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES.CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION. STEEL FENCE POSTS. MINIMUM LENGTH 4.S' 6.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL,BITUMINOUS SURFACING,CONCRETE ITEMS,ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS,AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE HARD SURFACE 10.76 - DRIVEN 2' (0.61 m) INTO THE GROUND. CONSTRUCTION SITE. PUBLIC ROAD S.COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO'PLAN SUBGRADE m ELEVATION'.THEPARKINGLOTAND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALLBEDETERMINED BYREFERRINGTOTHE SITE PLAN) FABRIC AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. c". 5°' p 'Illifil ls' FABRIC 9.THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. 10.FINISHED GROUND AND SOD ELEVATION ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE 6'BELOW FLOOR ELEVATION.SLOPE P5 M/N/M[],N 'III. GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6'IN 10 FEET BEYOND 10 FEET REFER TO PLAN GRADES. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE TO PROVIDE I-6" 153 mm) SMOOTH 8 UNIFORM SLOPES.WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PREVENT / _ PONDING IN LOWER AREAS.CONTACT ENGINEER IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PLANS ARE REQUIRED. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ONLY THOSE TREES MARKED IN THE FIELD VERIFY WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO 7,7 REMOVAL. 13.ALL GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MoOOT2105. 14.EXISTING CURB CUTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STANDARD DETAILS 1"-2" WASHED ROCK J (AND SPECIFICATIONS). 6" MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1 TYPICAL ROCK ENTRANCE 2 TYPICAL SILT 1.CONTRACTOR MUST CALL FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING 48HRS PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCES. FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN FINES.THE REVOCATION OF PERMIT AND A STOP WORK ORDER BEING NOT TO SCALE FENCE CONSTRUCTION ISSUED. C2 C2 NOT TO SCALE 2.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANON,LAND DISTURBANCE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION.INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT EACH POINT EROSION CONTROL NOTES WERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.USE 2 INCH OR GREATER DIAMETER ROCK IN A LAYER AT LEAST 1.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA,INCLUDING TEMPORARY STOCKPILES, 6 INCHES THICK ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE.EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 MUST 8E STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE USING A GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE TO PREVENT MIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW. THAN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF 4,REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.STABILIZE GRADING, TURF ESTABLISHMENT & AREAS.REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING OCCURS AND MAY BE ORDERED BY MINNEAPOLIS WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND STRAW MULCH APPLIED AT 2 TONS PER EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS INSPECTORS AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT.SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE ACRES. DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE INA MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT 2.SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON TURF ESTABLISHMENT PROPERTIES. THE PLAN AND AROUND ANY STOCKPILES.SILT FENCE SHALL BE ALL TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2575 AND 5.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS,WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE INSPECTED AND MAINTINED WEEKLY(AND WITHIN 24 HRS OF A 0.5" SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE COMPLETED GRADING DISTURBED AREAS.CATCH BASIN INSERTS OR OTHER APPROVED PRODUCT ARE REQUIRED IN UNDISTURBED AREAS THAT MAY RECEIVE RUN OFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA.HAV BALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES RAINFALL)UNTIL FINAL SEEDING AND MULCHING(OR SODDING)OF OPERATION. ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION. LOT. TOPSOIL B.LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE 3.ALL FABRIC FENCES USED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP,STOCKPILE AND RE-SPREAD SUFFICIENT CHANNEL.IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS,STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING,VEGETATIVE CONTROL SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL THE DISTRICT HAS TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH(COMPACTED)TO ALL COVER,TARPS,OR OTHER MEANS.CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS DETERMINED THAT THE SITE HA SBEEN PERMANENTLY RE-STABILIZED DISTURBED AREAS,TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. AROUND THE PILES.TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. SOD FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24HRS. 4.DUST CONTROL IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER.THE SOD SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 3878. 7.MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED.INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A PERMIT HOLDER MUST ELIMINATE DUST PROBLEMS UPON RECEIVING SEEDING DAILY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED,DAMAGED,OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. NOTICE FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THAT THERE ISA DUST SEED MIX SHALL BE MnDOT 50B AT 1008 PER ACRE.DORMANT SEEDING B.TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, PROBLEM. AFTER NOVEMBER 1,AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE. AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY 5.STREET CLEANING SHALL OCCUR DAILY OR AS NEEDED. MULCHING UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 7-14 DAYS.USE SEED AND 6.BUILDER TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MULCH SHALL BE MRDOT TYPE 1.STRAW SHOULD BE SPREAD MULCH.EROSION CONTROL MATTING.AND/OR SODDING AND STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS.AN EARLY PRECAUTIONS DESCRIBED UNDER EDINA CITY CODE CHAPTER 10, UNIFORMLY AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE AND ANCHORED WITH APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED RECOMMENDED MINIMIZING EROSION POTENTIAL. ARTICLE 7-LITTERING IN THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK. EITHER NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC. 9.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC,STRUCTURAL,NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 7.TOM LEACH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE FERTILIZER DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION ESTABLISHMENT.FINAL STABILIZATION FOR PURPOSED OF THIS REMOVAL IS 70%ESTABLISHED COVER OVER AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. TYPE 20-0-10 AT 4006 PER ACRE. DENUDED AREA. 8.SITE ACCESS SHALL BE VIA A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.TO I GRADING 10.READY MIXED CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.ALL THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE,HEAVY ALL GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2105. CONCRETE RELATED PRODUCTION,CLEANING AND MIXING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE IN THE DESIGNATED EQUIPMENT AND TRUCKS SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING CONCRETE MIXING/WASHOUT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.UNDER NO OUTSIDE OF THE GRAVEL PAD AT SITE ACCESS. CIRCUMSTANCE MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN CONVEYANCE. 9.IN THE CASE OF PUMPED DISCHARGE,CONTRACTOR MUST FILTER 11.CHANGES TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR ANY TURBID WATER THROUGH SAND AND SILT FENCE BEFORE PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION AND DETAILS FOR ALL PROPOSED DISCHARGING TO STREET.INLET PROTECTION MUST BE IN PLACE. ALTERNATE TYPE DEVICES. 'I 0.TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT 12.PREVENT COMPACTION OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE LANDSCAPED AS GREEN SPACE. CONTROLS IN PLACE TO PREVENT DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. Ii-ENGINEERING DESIGN H SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION, AND NAT I All A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME:TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 06/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 (((,,, c ((,�'' 6480 Way 01 d Minneapolis,MN 55426 `EDF. '/(1%7E( ,Sc.'Yiv044. 6/25/15 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD (' rL AIL:jS:(]63)545 2800 FAX.17631 545 2801 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY:VS NO. 3 OF 3 'MAIL.in!o®edsmn.com WEBSITE help//edsmn.cam VADIMIR SIVRIVER L.5 NO.25105 EDINA,MN 55436 WADI E ` 0 o BO Call 48 Hours before digging GENERAL N ��� l ` GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1. SEE SWMP NOTES ON SHEET C5 FOR FURTHER SWMP REQUIREMENTS,IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS PLAN AND PLAN ppp���,,, AAA SCALE IN FEET Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 SWMP NOTES,THE SWMP NOTES SHALL OVERRULE. MANAGEMENT P L 1 W y q 2.ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE �.ll 0 Q MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 INITIAL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL , AREAS ALTERED HAVE BEEN RESTORED. 3.ALL REAR YARD AREAS OF LOTS AT SETBACK LINE ARE TO BE , MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF GRADING BY GRADING - ' .1 CONTRACTOR.ALL AREAS BETWEEN THE CURB AND SETBACK LINE - I\ ,I NUMBERED NOTES ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF PRIVATE UTILITY INSTALLATION BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR. ,,W .(>INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING re {o .- i>L ACTIVITIES. 4.STREET SWEEPING MUST BE UNDERTAKEN ON AN AS-NEEDED -- BASIS. - . " // O2 INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE S " � PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 5. PERFORM SEEDING FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREA �_.- / v AS FOLLOWS: 1 INSTALL SWMP BOX NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE /I C/\Y4/�7 k.;✓ I a.REPLACE TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS.LOOSEN I INSTALL TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT PAD. TOPSOIL TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3". ] b.APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER PER ,>rl I I' OS TREE PROTECTION DEVICE 1,000 SQUARE FEET. .. ,� Ii c.INCORPORATE FERTILIZER INTO SOIL BY USE OF HARROW OR W ,• `J • • OTHER MEANS TO PLACE FERTILIZER BELOW GROUND LEVEL. P 7s ' 1-- I d.APPLY ACRE WITH BRIDLE OND MIXTURE TRE 190 AT OTHER OF /00 POUNDSUPER P - 94$ ! pSt' l]D --7,-\�\' 73:98- .. 3vVO COVER SEED WITH 4"TO i"OF SOIL. „ yyy y e.APPLY UNIFORM COVERING OF Mn/DOT TYPE 1 MULCH ATA ".yy 4Y 37 `Yti3 I #5524 I it I, RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. •-1,fo5ED HOOSE / 4�T G 'I I.ANCHOR MULCH TO DEPTH OF 2"TO 3"WITH DISC ANCHOR OR F�f-f yy FfE-938 56 J AT \ _ l 1 \ l i OTHER MEANS IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING. f BASEMENT 92400 °T M1 ��, �� \ I I - II i n2 c 41 n ^k}lK 1 1 EXISTING P IO -m 2 6 ,. V •.5 ] " •i•. • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON ` 'T -�^ R .1r,•z eft' e , ti _ , I {] _ _ _ _ I I DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE - 'I 1s , \ y °`os 08 \ .AB , I 1'11 �I - .. DENOTES LOT LINE 1 .I. .AtO yK .;00ds't 3T \M. l �I[]/ \ ,r,O _ I I , I' , i -`DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE ,.I ._ 'd. e ^. __ __ _ ,Y� 5c ,d,d;':' DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION1L . :14 -4— DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW � 6p - •�$' ` 1 —0E—DENOTES OVERHEADDENOTES ELECTRIC PO POWER POLE "I� 938., 80.7W 932,0. OWE'^O `4 6�'t //� 1��' ® •�C ��. II �I �d1 1 ASID m 6 ,p 10 y -o—DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE •" � pnno a� � A< ;,1: I �._ �t�na -. -o—DENOTES WOOD FENCE _-4, .' `"'� _..-Bws2B.o. s27s \ .d /r'i 4 '� ..-. . . _ _ E, DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE 1 i•.,. .is " , _, ..'gw 92.0`. .2. n'� �." _. / tl L<_,S I TW 92qQ 1,3� { � I ,. II 0 DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE - { I s� �� -8 "Y11.] a IVO,cw v • 1 r: e DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT _ 1`� - • • 1 C1+ "Iie I h II -i O DENOTES SOIL BORING ' cJ<n 01� & {.I', r I .•T \"� I --� DENOTES SIGN/POST (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE/ 4Y}' "`7 ,�. f��F., I '�\\\ II I! p E - DENOTES GUY ANCHOR 0P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCF7,. ,25., • - • I �,.,PN `I i E... -- PROPOSED 4ra► I D I- .I DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE �'DENOTES PROPOSED•; . •1 I 4:t+4 q;"^ `4 • I I I / ! #5528 li �I 4 DRAINAGE FLOW n -L 1 I I I I i ! DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE :044174 DENNISDROCK "k" 'I 4th • C N rcRUCTION ENTRANCE r 's 9 I. 1 ( I L-----.--as:7a---- I d W DENOTES PROPOSED ADSPOUT a• IkRS�XI DENOTES PROPOSED GRADE 'DENOTES PROPOSED L I -1 W E -1'_ N� .�,_.r� ." ...=F ......10_� �~/ / I r I "n4• ` -_fi� ..--.. . 1 SILT F NCE � � A" / �o�- :�- -n.—.n-•--" I ,. DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED - ^p - 1;-I I . DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES UNDERGROUND STORM 11, u I nl I • • DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES RETAINING WALL ENGINEERING DESIGN S,SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY 111AT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERNSION. AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JOB NAME:TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 Ln ,, 6400 Woy[a1a Blvd.Minneupoii,,MN 55426 , { ;p: , OFFICE:17631 545-2800 FAX:17631 545-2801 W�RFi S,✓Ycue�. 3/29/201e LOCATION: 5528 INTERLACHEN BLVD < I I EMAIL:into@edsmn.<om WEBSITE:han://ed,mD.<pm EDINA,MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY:VS SHEET NO.4 OF 5 Call 48 Hours before digging Storm Water Manegemem Rancription of the type and locations of BMP's appropriate for I.site and sufficient to 4.Sediment Conti.Pacnces The work described to mplamenl lie followin95erm Water Management Plan(SWMP) Deswily al applicablerequiremen,a of the TMDL implementation pen and .. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL hallee considered part of the Contract Documents and shall be performed by IM1e identification of the receiving water tineel the oremenl proleclslee l...gins to enDescription°Mediatele mnlralpraclicea re be used to minimize sad...efrom Contractor.The work tonstafiand maintain the Cosi Management Practies(BMP's)to impaired water mal has an approved TMDL irol4emenlallon plan Nat contains entering surface waters,including curb and 9i...systems and storm drain ink.: prevent erosion and provide sediment conlrolshallbe In accordance with Permit No.MN requlremnls formnsuuclion Slormwaler discharges: p 00001 and shall include,but are not necessarily be IMMO l0,the requirementssedlnt control practices la be used an els projecteonsdstpf Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 contained herein. Not anpYcable tocols project. Jkn nusedimentm ron basins.Temporary se...control pracrcea IO be used are sift fence, mart mer pratoepen,storm sewer inlet prolectmn,crane pad exits,ditch checks.and. MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 1,Consrrucllon Activity Information Selection Of Permanent Ser..'Management System Il necessary,streel sweeping. Project Name:RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE DESIGN Will me project create a new cumulative impervious surface greeter than or equal to one 5.Dewatering and Basin Dorking Project Address/Location:Town...MS.-R.0e=117.29-21 acre]_ _ 9.Pollution Prevention Management Measures City/Township:City of EDINA Slate:MN Zip Cade:55,136 Yes go No project induces dmvalering or basin Malning,describe the BMP'z la be usedlo re County Parcel ID...risk 20-117-21-1,009 Oyes,a water quality volume of ID Inch of rrinoff him this area must he Mated before landowners. the discharge from adversely affecting the receiving waters and downstream shallimplementIM1e(Mowing pollution prevention managementmasureson occur:All City o1 EDINA entering surface waters(1 inchelrunoff from mis area it dischargiml Cosite. All townships en a where construction will occur,Not Apr..o easpecia waiter. Allied Stns where consni tion will occur:HENNEPIN County NIA Solid Waste:Co tect Project Size(number of acres le be disturbed):0.90 M0045!:)to he used to Met nme11Item the new Impervious surfaces created by the and properly dispose of sediment,asphalt and concrete mllings, Project Type: _ denial Commardal/Industrial E Additional BMP'e for Special Waters one Discharges to Wetlands sing deMe.pnes plastic,fabrics,construction and demolition debris,and other _Road Conslruclbn Other project: 'f Hazardous Malarial With MPGA disposal requirements. x 1 Wel sedimentation basin —Infiltration/Flllralion basin wastes n accordanceMMaterials:Properly store,provide required This or...es nal discharge slonnwam dimity to a...Water,.d Water.This project secondary containment,and CumulaliveaImpervious of impervious Regional ponds _ brnelron practices does not discharge tormwalnreu y wetlands,exeDl roof fi"PVC. substancesse el t p revert,fuels.,leaks,products.disnd charges hazardous Loin" of roc � ion cs to prevent spills,leaks,and other tlischarges in accordance with Pee• ling area of00140 Dus surface to nearest neelracre:eel nd)e)lo be used,including design lniOleieion for each 7.Construcllbn Activity Sequence et, MPCA regulatinon.Pr°vitle restricted amass storage areas to prevent unaueor¢etl Post construction area of Impervious surface In nearest nuaner erre:0.19 of mellr and vis ns.Pro Receiving Sealers: method. In addition i pl on Io pedgrMn9 ane sequencing lacks associated wile implementing lM1is accessaEquipmenl Washing:Restrict exlernalwashing al trucks and ahermnstrucli0n Name of Water Body D Appendix A Special Wale. Existing pond will be used le collect water,romo lie roof. SWMPras described herein and shown on the Nan,the Contractor shall perform equipment l0 a defined area of sire.Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. PONNo constr./Ilion activities in accordance with the following sequence. Engine degreasingis prohibited on the property. D011110 70 of why it is nal feasible a meet lite Treatment requirement for water quality • Ii prevention;rials n e designated area heeled en lar en eradicable hoer pe ell al sous Dates of Consuuclen volume.This can include pr°xmily to bedrock or road'meteors where the lack of (1)Install sill lance along property Me of project sire where shown on plan and°nen nmenlaldsensiried areas,ealeda fares impoundment lanlialDiner sures emtnl properly line is down gradient and withn 1001ee1 of areas In have disturbed sol and right-of-way precludes the nstalel on of any permanent s ormwater manag regtired to contain spilled material.Remove and dispose 0f contaminated soilmea Estunaled Conslmdlon Start Dale:Mn?,2916 practices.Description of whet oilier lrealmenl,lsuc0one as ruin die swales.smaller onerer ornate properly line is within el of soil endciingDI and Oiler roshoredon he plan. eesnleren,and other materials and perform Omer mitigation measuresesrequired. Esimaled Comp..Dale:DECEMBER,2016 or grichambers.win be implemented to Teal run prior le Mscharge to sudece waters: (2)Melee sill lance along edge SI werlanes and al other imam°shown on the plan. accordance with MPCAregulas ans. (3)Inslall stone exit pads where shown on plan and at Ober locations where vehicles accordaryantlhR1PCWade:Prons. and maintain temporary lacXllles in accordance Contact information Not Applicable and equipment will leave the site onto paved and gravel surfaces. •with MPCn antlMtic Was Department of Heallt (4)Construct storm water ponds and related piping antl corer.structures es shown on n regulations. Owner of Project Site:TOM LEACH Description al how a proposed alierna.method to veal runoff mm new Impervious the project plena.lnslall and maintain tampon erosion prevention measures as shown Cosines,.Name:N/A t aces will achieve approximately MPA removal of total suspended solids on an annual on lie plan. O.Final Stabilization Feder.Tax ID Number:available as needed a (S)Install silt fence along bollam al slormwaler pond Insepes and where shown on I. Contractor anal.achieve final sabl¢al'wn of construction site gide State-Tax 10 Number:evadable as nestle° average basis: pan y achieve Contact Person:TOM LEACHNat npP hk IMInstall trunk sanitary sewer. following: Title:OWNER OF PROJECT SITE (7)Complete earthwork aceilies.Install and maintain sediment control measures such soils are slahlizetl byaunlorm n Adtlress 8200 IDS CENTER 0058TH STREET City: Prevention Pactns as dikeclacksantlhtormwam nletmored Tan. perennial vegelmWevrmver wily beencompleted o11e70dpercenl over the entire pervious surface Phone:g 3.Erosion Prov as MI.prole Wilily s work orr proceedsell and manlain sediment control measures such res or osier equlvaenl means l0 State:MN Zip Code:55402.221S scrthercosirucipractinesitoheeuseMe buffer erosion:oniel slope grading, as sill deposes from pr erosionni preit vention an sediment coirol Ma inn practices 10 be used to minimize erosion: 19)Remre sir deposits Irom rile.remove sill deposits from slormwaler basins. 'Temporary synlielic and serctual erosion prevanbon antl sedrmenl conlml BMP's are CDnlaclor(Parry who will oversee implemenarion of rhe SWMP.May be same pang as antl other ctlnstruct (IN)N Provide soil srebirizotion etlisluroetl areas by mepann9 topsoil.seMing.enil¢in9, remov'aeamenl is removed from permanent setlimenlalnn basins to relum basins la me I Owner above): Siege the soil disturbing activates to minimize me ern..of disturbed soil prior to m Ing,anchoring mulch in accordance with plans and sledfmlions. stabiliza.'an.Disturbed areas will.considered stabilized when covered with materkls (11)Remove pedmelersilt fence,other sill fen.,check Jams,and Winer sediment esign.paciry,removed from slormwaler conveyance systems,end's slahiMed or e eslness/Firm Herne:TOM LEACH such as anchored mulch,staked sad,dpap,wood fiber blanket,or other materials Nat control sup n achieving Mol slablizalion and Owner submits the Notice of removed from the sire. Federal Tax 10 Numbs,available as needed prevent erosion from occurring.Grass seeding alone will nal he considered stabilization. Terminatio.Srste Tax ID eded tt Notice of Termination Contact Person:TOrM LEACH Tike OWNER OF PROJECT SITE Disturb only the as where proposed contours and elevations are shown to differ B.Inspections and Maintenance Phone:612-336-4665 from IM1e exist.seare dotherO loos are noted.Special areas of Con...shall login Owner leaned.*upon achieving Heel Stabiealion.Owner g and where 0011 removals an pear vi are noted on I plan. Description motey inspect 1 must submll Ina Notice of Terminalion within 30 days eller Hoer Stabilization or within MaingA21ofCda:5542-2215 CENTER STREET Oily:MINNEAPOLIS Ile project site Mal are naltobe Olslurbed by Consimchon acll' he Oesal Ion of procedures to betaken to routine. he construction Bile: 30 days of another owner assuming control according to Pad 11.0.5.over all areas of the Sale:MN Zp Coda:55402-2215 site that have net undergone Final Slabillzation. Descri0 elooitemhnSOOerosionfeet surface mmaeenlmve,lobe used for exposed - linen*ContracleodeliOspect ..Reper.rOn,nn andupplementrrlent onvolnMP'seensure General Conslmctlon Project lnlwmelion hive slopes within molog0lineal feet al a sudece basin.stor wale,,laMage ysMm, i moire c ne nually veness.al BIAP replace,orsepp ll Ins'ct the entire i BMP's ro DeeP?40n of the construction activity(what wvill be drill,genealfime/ins,.etc). veltand,reservoir course.,and stormwatertemstorm weer ceeage Is need provide minimum of (cede eevenil'ldcccactor shaeneoeconstthe empire constwithin 4 hours rways,water courses and laximlonrye an exposed waterIsexposed mmmemall oncee reryertha f0.5 Ices in 24 hour.Inspeclionand wiIM1in24 M1ours a1en leearea is not aclivery being worked: Specific 0sks areas.erosion prevention nanction and.0110enaceMand iadlratnnareas. th grading Operations loxpothe edsoil cltonofsurface bituminandulililes.NODI Bran Specific tasks associated wily the inspection and maintenance ofIM BMP's Include the sewer rucllan,exposed soil slabiization,and bituminous paving cull follow grading de year round slabAlxation to the above mentioned areas in accordance wile the following: ape allonssl Inlh wing Ingle: 'maintenance and retain el.M1e made 01 ne hila written records maintenance of lea ineednns and Maximum Exposure Dualen Wnen Area clude:Date anrt time o RamNs of eacM1en once an and eOfpoecli)PeraP 2.General Site lnlmmati0n Steepness of slope(H:V) IS NaIAcu y Worked Fain limens inction;Recommended aercorr ly:Name Of CorMs)PeenMng utak n; ...vita:Finding an of inspection;Recommentlee greater actions:In 24 tivehou acli0ns and Descdplion the bm400 and type of el temporary dna permanent erosion prevention Greater than 0:1 1 Days m end pale,or supple enof tNO all fence Mat become than 0,5lnMeh in 24 hours. Sediment BMP's todi usetl,epts IM1e Ptsa Ioncssary1m and 3:1 through 11:1 14 Days •Repair,replace,vesupplement NO fences Inst be came ril.29tihnal ouoraccumulate procedures useO to establish aeeisdnal tempts,BMP's as necessary. Less Nan 10:1 21 Days n the level0MI.ac sill fence height or more wilM1in 24 nous of discovery or as se. COncillions Contractor shall Instal and mainlan lee temporary and Pennanenoyendeedeenlbn Desc.lian of prectlnlglo be used to stabilizelhe normal welled perimeter of drainage elomeompoarya.llh permanent sediment bases and remove sediment when the and sedme.conlml BMP's as shown on the accompanying drawing and as descdbed or diversion ditches wlhln NM deel feel of Me property edge m point.discharge tea volumeofsediment collected reaches 1/2lhe permanent storage volume will.72 heroin.The liming shall..acroNance with the Construction Activey Sequence Se. surface water within 24 hours of mnnecling the ditch l°Me surface water. o discovery or as soon as con Jn inallow access. and in accordance wXh sound and proactne mnstrucrion scheeufing and practices. „Inspect surface waters,tlaieage ditches,end slormwaler conveyance system for Install seed,epithet,and diseanchored mulch or temporary wood fiber blanket In evidence of sediment deposited by Inneserosion.Remove defies enddeposited10010ted able dt and Accompanying this SWMP k a site plan Mal includes the lodoveng features: ditches and swales..in 24 heels of connecting the ditch or svx.e to IM1e surface wafer esebilize areas where sediment removal results n exposed soil wwiMin seven(7)days where shown On Ne plan in accordance WN the deeils. of discovery unless precludetl by legal,resWatory.Or physkal constants.Removal end •Existing end proposed grades.Including dividing lines and direcllon of 11.for aY pre- slobillaalion s.11 be completed within seven(7)days of obtaining access.The end posHconslruction No...,ninon drainage areas located within!he project limits. Description of ate,ereslon prevention pmclices to ha usetl: NPDES/SDS permit holder is responsible for Dant..°Ina local region.,slate,and , •Locutions of Impervious surfaces and sail types. federal authorities and receiving the eppirCeNe permits Odor to performing mis work, be disturbed. Install e Ne specified energy disoeleennelnod,such as tuned'and gbeetexlile IaNi1,et Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations ler evidence of sediment being Racked 'Methotl(s)to he used for final stabilization of al exposed soil meas. pipewoutlets villin 24 hours of inslalladion.Permanently see tlrsered areas prior a off site onto paved surfaces.Remve tracked sediment from offsite paved surfaces of seeding dales specified by/MOOT. whirrs 24 hours of discovery. Description of slorrmxaler mllgalnn measures required an the resold of an e 'Inspect perimeter of construction eve.Remove osf-site accumulalens of sediment in t• me n1a1,archaeologkal,or other required local,stale,or I.e.review of the manner and ata frequency l0 minimize olksire impacts. project: ro ec Not eppllcaNe a This protect. ENGINEERING DESIGN$SURVEYING HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JOB NAME:TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO,: 15-108 6480 Way Plod.Minneapolis,MN 55026 OFFICE:(763)545-2800 FAX (7671 5452801 '1(0 d 5T;nVdnn 1100 el/20/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERIACHEN BLVD FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY:VS NO. 5 OF 5 ^/If` '.MAIL:infoMedsmn.com WEBSITE IUtp://edemn.eom EDINA,MN 55436 o A✓ 40 ap Call 48 Hours before digging S: ' PL x _ _ �� GOPHER STATE ONE CALL L� l� 1 Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 SCALE IN rEEr LEGEND EXISTING MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 3. o • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON 'i ,0C Q� " ,C DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE ati �� p� Proposed Replacement Trees — <DO. ') # DENOTES LOT LINE „,,,,I• ' `_ g"56�4l���' Denotes Coniferous Tree 6 16 -999 —DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE • /0999.99 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION 60 !/,' 0 0 Denotes Deciduous Tree -4--- DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW N00'38'14"I 175.00(P) ,�`,,. ('` 4 4 SI `l, DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE y —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC , i ! \ coMPureO POSmoN or GRsiN� '♦.:/ I ° —0—DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE CORNER FALLS IN POND I I —0—DENOTES WOOD FENCE• + A 71::"- / y.- 0 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE RI.-a'. ao_ SN,"" - ® DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE POND r�a*VI&/ /Q� H I R)u DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT 7� r o DENOTES SOIL BORING WATER LEVEL=9IS97 .LIP 4,�'�♦4 TIP / �q� O DENOTES SIGN/POST AS MEASURED ON 8/14/15 .�,, &41" �4no+ c'''''' _ _� DENOTES GUY ANCHOR EIMd AD •I . ' (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE �� (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE ,• A ♦, �/9'�d 10 ` 739a I W PROPOSED / '�<M 1 w ® i..:1 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE /.40,0 / \ ❑j0 N #5524 I »—DENOTES STORM SEWER Iil. P .f/ II EXISTING ® DENOTES DOWNSPOUT �+#'. '�, PROPOSED HOUSE /iq^ u' • ° +, HOUSE., DENOTES RETAINING WALL \ FEE-938.56 q-' \ >,•5' ,i)--- TOB=936.48 tier., Z '� \ I <__. DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED `v f "4.2* ti61 \ 275 • \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION A.M IC.! o. X462 wq i Lot 7,BRUIN'S SUBDIVISION,Hennepin County, :,I(y� CITY OF EDINA i . �'/' ELa \ c(96 :,1- $P ` A' RENO-MIMI(}Y1012 Minnesota,according to the recorded plat thereof. J� v� p 9 OP HYORANT_93a.36 BUILDING SETBACKS ir "( I' ;Fl^- 2� I - f ZONING: R1=SINGLE DWELLING UNIT L„ <` k z /+" SOD'27'24"E 1 J.93(M) 174(P) i_ �'- 9.". AMc<4•ZAN a0 ''10'`• (� %� n ;� HOUSE: FRONT=10.00 FT rqe ��'I I� 4f ' . PROPOSED C. ' • ..,6FN q6•- \m ..> (1a REAR 10.00 FT iyCO- .30/ A T o.19. ., ,.DRIVEWAY:.•.::.. rABa O A :.x>�... 9Y,;..�,_;.. w REAR=25.00 FT - B6J x G rr. 1;2.44x.:.,..•_ N EXISTING HARDCOVER I F RE 6A�D \. ‘'.).GRA, .: 9 'ATO m \69 `+6. 0 '': .. ....'..., ''' °' 'DI ...2p.„---a,I ' S , A \6.5 aYo. �� risr.: ` Aw;' rL- d Ca O ], TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.00 SQ.FT. `a. '1 A owE-�, .` t 1• /ONE1 '•:'•.' ':.3,. *NV- U TOTAL LOT AREA 67,601 SQ.FT.(1,55 AC.) _� ILY �a� PATIO 40 y.•#vYA ?� .LOCHS /,fe' I 82].5 ��-Er! "'� l{ 500'31'00"E 1733-0-44---1,7-4 • d" yl EXISTING HARDCOVER 0.0% ��x" i DAk 2\ GREE rt IN �� nil PROPOSED HARDCOVER /// • V. ASH •W SN ------__ \ I 1 f l w PROPOSED HOUSE 4,023.68 SQ.FT. /A Ia/cAr✓ a' �\ n"Pnt '°,4s I yv"� S--' o PROPOSED CONC.SURFACE 4,237.56 SQ.FT. q,5°jL� / NONEr>A< �Y � ASA Le n a \\\�" \ TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 8,261 SQ.FT. /7- HONEY -‘,1,,, �h a m \ \_� TOTAL LOT AREA 67,601 SQ.FT,(1,55 AC,) / 25 O IS" - e. z v _;_ NOTESROPOSED HARDCOVER 12.22 oA/( iN AMEEM N O 10 m i 1,THE BA8I5 OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. qv'I' - 'm \\\`#5528\ 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED __ \ EXISTING\ � w 3.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS /12-° x "' HOUSE\ �_ O SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. RED !1 010008 \\\\�\\ 89.78 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER 1$❑ L .' - -` --J GARAGES '1 LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY ( 0v �� ,� 10to r 0/_moi(.._,_-yt ' �Td- —=a —DC— —DE — DE C'1 OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY :�p��/�� •� �I ILL RESIDENT TESTIMONY,OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAYBE 000'26 46'W 226.04( m 225.96(P) qp 1' I PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY wa CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO G 6 I- ° - I ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. 5 CONTRACTOR HAI I VERIFY PROPOSED VATIONS I HEREBY CERTIFY MAT TMS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERWSION. D ENGINEERING DESIGN&SURVEYING AND THAT I AM A DULY UCEN,E0 LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS aF THE STATE of MINNESOTA. JOB NAME TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: EP PROJECT NO.: 15-108 6480 Wayzata Blvd.Minneapolis,MN 55426 /k\I OFFICE:17631 545-2800 FAX:(7631 545.2801 'year/ 61,,y,',,Pir DRIED. 3/213/2015LOCATION: 5525 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL:inloeed:mn..am WE851rE:Mp://edrmn.Aom HADIMIR SP/RIVER Ls.Na zsms EDINA,MN 55438 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY:VS SHEET NO. 1 OF 5 Q 5526 Interlachen Blvd Tree Survey Data 7/21/2015 Tag# dbh Species Comments Species Key 2900 11 RM RM= Red Maple 2899 12 GA GA=Green Ash 2898 20 RO RO=Red Oak 2897 8 RM AE=American Elm 2896 16 RO BC=Black Cherry 2895 18 RO RP=Red Pine 2894 8 AE CT=Cottonwood 2893 11 RO HL=Honey Locust 2892 18 RO 2891 9 BC 2890 12 BC 2889 12 RP 2888 12 RP 2887 12 RO 2886 34 CT Dead 2885 25 CT 2884 15 RO 2883 8 HL 2882 13 RO 2881 18 RO 2880 14 AE 2879 16 GA 2878 11 GA 2877 9 GA 2876 10 HL 2875 14 RO 2874 9 AE 2873 9 GA 2872 26 CT 2871 8 AE 2870 12 RM 2869 9 HL 2868 11 BC 2867 9 GA 2866 9 GA 2865 9 GA CITY OF EDINA MEMO City Hall © Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389•www.CityofEdina.com D+ s n 0 `uf e ley • IAHA Date: April 27, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Joyce Repya, Senior Planner Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment— Scoreboard Regulations for Courtney Field and Kuhlman Stadium INTRODUCTION Troy Stein, on behalf of Edina Public Schools is requesting an amendment to the City's Sign Ordinance to build a new scoreboard at Kuhlman Stadium. The proposed new sign is 544 square feet in size. (See applicant narrative, and plans on pages A 1-A10.) The City's Zoning Ordinance requires a maximum of 200 square feet for Kuhlman Stadium, with no more than 25% of the sign area to be used for advertising. The 200 square foot maximum and 25% provision are the result of an ordinance amendment done in 1998. The 1998 amendment included criteria for scoreboards at Edina's recreational facilities. The request was initiated by the Park Board in response the Edina Baseball Association's desire to include sponsorship panels on the scoreboards. (See attached minutes and staff report on pages Al2-A20.) Since the Ordinances were written specifically for each use, rather than a Variance, staff recommended a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, rather than such a large Variance request to accommodate the new signage/scoreboard. BACKGROUND Concerns in 1998, when the current Zoning Ordinance regulations were adopted included: • The sign code prohibited non-accessory signs in the City of Edina which resulted in the exclusion of billboard signs in the community. • By increasing the size of the scoreboards to include sponsorship panels, billboard type signs would be erected in the parks. To address the potential for billboard sized advertising, the code adopted limited the amount of the scoreboard sign that could include sponsor panels to 25%. arimummik. • City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO gI1.IA,11 ! oke `!,; tti CB A2,), Below is the total size of the scoreboard allowed by the facility: 75% 25% Facility # of signs Total Sign Area Scoreboard Sponsor Panel #1 Courtney Field I 400 sq.ft. 300 sq.ft. 100 sq.ft. 1. Van Valkenburg I per field 200 sq.ft. 150 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. 2. Kuhlman Field 3. Braemar Field (except Courtney#I) All other public parks I per field 100 sq.ft. 75 sq. ft. 25 sq.ft. Schools & golf courses Currently, the Edina High School (EHS) and Edina Athletic Booster Club (EABC) are proposing to replace the dated scoreboard at Kuhlman Field on the campus of the Edina Community Center. They have found that the current scoreboard is technologically outdated and football specific in its design and language. The specific issues regarding the need to replace the scoreboard include: • The current scoreboard is dated with replacement parts difficult to find. • There is a limited wireless capability. Wireless can become very important as technology like play clocks are integrated into the game experience • The current scoreboard is incompatible with LED light technology • Kuhlman Field also hosts soccer, lacrosse, and track & Field, yet the existing scoreboard cannot be used for these events. The existing scoreboard at Kuhlman Field measures 150 square feet in area includes no j sponsorship panels and simply provides football information. (See page A4.) A new scoreboard with an overall measurement of 544 square feet in area is proposed. The portions of the sign broken down include: A. Accent Truss w/ Backlit Channel logo 160 square feet B. Sponsor Panel 64 square feet* C. Scoreboard 256 square feet D. Sponsor Panel 64 square feet* 544 square feet The Two sponsor panels total 128 square feet, or 23.5 % of the total scoreboard sign, consistent with the 25% rule. The total cost of the proposed scoreboard sign is $60,000. 11111111111M. _ _ tY .ter City of Edina 4801 W.50th St. . Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO w91/'—"�l'rir e • )1.4 ®•®.ay O To gain some perspective into the trend in high school scoreboards, staff researched similar sized schools that recently constructed new scoreboards to determine their size and how those cities' regulated them. Please note that on the information on the next few pages, the size of the scoreboards at similar sized schools are much larger than the scoreboards that are proposed in Edina. Eden Prairie. Eden Prairie High School replaced the scoreboard at their football field in 2013. Eden Prairie's sign ordinance does not address scoreboards in the community, thus it was permitted as an accessory structure. A variance was required for the scoreboard's height. Accessory structures are limited to 30 ft. in height, the new scoreboard was 48 feet in height, and thus an I 8-foot height variance for an accessory structure was approved. (See Eden Prairie Scoreboard, staff report and minutes on pages A2I-A33.) The following are the statistics for Eden Prairie High School's scoreboard installed in 2013: • Total square footage 1,432 s.f. • Sponsorship panels 573 sq. ft. (40%) • Total height 48 feet (variance required) • Cost $459,000 of which $65,000 paid by Boosters Burnsville. The City of Burnsville approved a conditional use permit and sign size variance to allow advertising on the scoreboard. (See Burnsville Scoreboard, staff report and minutes on pages A34-A38.) The following are the statistics for Burnsville High School's scoreboard installed in 2014: • Total square footage 1,350 s.f. • Sponsorship panels 362 sq. ft. (40%) • Total height 45 feet (variance required) Wayzata. The City of Plymouth (Wayzata High School is located in Plymouth) approved a conditional use permit to construct a 950 square foot scoreboard. Plymouth allows a maximum of a 950 square foot sign and 50 feet in height in the "Public Institution" zoning district. (See the Wayzata Scoreboard, Plymouth staff report and minutes on pages A39-A46.) The following are the statistics for Wayzata High School's scoreboard installed in 2012: • Total square footage 950 s.f. (1,121 s.f. using Edina's method of sign measurement) • Sponsorship panels 243 sq. ft. (25%) • Total height 50 feet Minnetonka. The City of Minnetonka allows a 1,000 square foot scoreboard for stadiums with a capacity of 2000 persons. Both Hopkins High School and Minnetonka High School are located in the City of Minnetonka. A simple permit was pulled for the Minnetonka scoreboard pictured on page A I I.) City of Edina 0 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO I w9�10& r� o lC 4:01 N.,.,ft may? •`,✓ •a Scoreboard Size ® City/School Comparison City Sign Area Height Sponsor 1 Panel Edina—Current 400 s.f. 20 feet 25% Edina - Proposed 544 s.f. 30 feet 25% Minnetonka 1,000 s.f. 30 feet NA Plymouth (Wayzata 950 s.f. 50 feet 25% High) Eden Prairie 1,432 s.f. 30 feet—approved 40% an 18 foot variance for a 48 foot tall scoreboard Burnsville 1,350 s.f. (CUP) 45 feet 40% 1 The attached draft Ordinance proposes changes to the scoreboard provisions of Section 36- 171 1 as follows: • Provide the same criteria for #1 Courtney Field and Kuhlman Field. • Increase total sign area for #1 Courtney Field /Kuhlman Field to 550 square feet. The existing sign at Courtney Field is 498 square feet. (See page A8.) The proposed ordinance would bring that sign into conformance. No permits were pulled when that sign was constructed. • Increase sign height for#1 Courtney/Kuhlman fields from 20 feet to 30 feet to allow for at least 10 feet of clearance from the bottom of the sign • Maintain sponsorship signage to 25% of total sign area Based on the comparison of similar scoreboards at similar sized schools, staff would recommend the Ordinance changes as proposed. Edina's regulations would still be far more restrictive to these other schools. 1_ a City of Edina 4801 W.50th St. Edina, MN 55424 ORDINANCE NO. 2016- AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SCOREBOARD REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article XIII. Division 5, Section 36-1711 is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1711.— R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 Districts The following signs are permitted in the R-1, R-2 and PRD-1 districts: Type Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height A. Nameplate or address !One per dwelling unit 2 square feet 6 feet B. Building identification (churches,schools,golf courses,pubic facilities only) Wall 1 per building 24 square feet Freestanding 1 per frontage 36 square feet 8 fe- i IC. Area identification One per 24 square feet 6 feet development iD. Public park identification One per frontage 24 square feet 6 fee _ I E. Scoreboards: 1. Field No. 1 Courtney Field & Kuhlman ( 400 550 square feet -30 '-et (Stadium One i(including sponsor panels) 1 2. Van Valkenburg Park,Kuhlman Field and One per field 200 square feet(including 20 fe t Braemar Park except Field No. 1 at Courtney Fields sponsor panels) 3. All other public parks,schools and golf One per field 100 square feet 20 feet courses F. Public park scoreboard sponsor panels and other scoreboard advertising 25%of scoreboard area Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. Existing text—XXXX Stricken text—XXXX Added text—XXXX First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Existing text—XXXX 2 Stricken text—XXXX Added text— Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 4/21/2016 ,'4 c .1,, r, 1- ^;1i1r_ r, 1r- ,2-,-1---t_ ci17, ri-11fi f> - tl_ � w� 4. C"2n#s i 6.62;3 • rrt -c. W � """"" KA ��� ;adlancl FLa17 Vt.',..-1 + I twa. �` y L t t' :; t' t;T,p:.r c.+le�'*' ✓C )11r. 1 �i�. + - R ... R g as - r . fL- r ni r.yam-. F,'t- - ra R - tf. - ::11::-., '.1.. : F ., � 1r ,� _fir--,. r g' r 1 f t r' •1 t ' .,i'.} ;�„f r::,i ,r-_,'... r"r'-` ,,,,,,' -'4'1-..1L-•-4-: PaIlLE, ,PilgeriLi L. ' •• '4 t'c'••77•-. 7:.-4, ' '•`--1r4"..-'‘. • • , a --- , m`,*` tr- t. "t•' --= :. 1 inch =400 feet No results Pro OS4 t-o cot iro Comments: hSite Location This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 M March 30, 2016 Joyce Repya, Edina City Planner Cary Teague, Director of Community Development Dear Joyce and Cary: Thank you for considering the request made on behalf of Edina High School (EHS) and the Edina Athletic Booster Club (EABC) regarding the proposed replacement of the scoreboard at Kuhlman Field on the campus of the Edina Community Center. The current scoreboard is very old, and football specific in its design and language. The EABC in coordination with EHS is planning to set aside roughly $60,000 to replace the current board with a modern, multi-purpose version. The reasons we are supportive of this initiative and want to provide the funding to Edina High School include: • As mentioned, the current scoreboard is only applicable for football. The language on the board includes phrases like: "Down," "To Go," "Quarter," etc. Given that Kuhlman Field also hosts soccer, lacrosse, and track&field,we would like a scoreboard that also works for these sports. • The designs that are under consideration all allow for some modest space for advertisements. This will allow the EHS and the EABC to establish a newer, premium level of sponsorship that will be a source of revenue. This incremental revenue will allow us to offset the cost of the new scoreboard, as well as generate funds to continue meeting the needs of the activities which we support. • The current scoreboard is quite dated. There are several factors that come into play which make the current scoreboard a challenge: o Parts for replacements are very difficult to find o There is very limited wireless capability. Wireless can become very important as technology like play clocks are integrated into the game experience o LED light technology We feel that this design for an updated scoreboard is both needed and reasonable. As you have seen from the presentation, several other communities have invested in up to $500,000 scoreboards that integrate video as well. This is not the direction that we are pursuing. We are cognizant of the fact that Kuhlman is in an urban area and do not want to propose anything too grand at this time. However, a functional, multi-purpose, low maintenance,reasonably-priced-replacement is needed. Thank you again for the consideration, and please advise us if there is any additional information that we can provide. Sincerely, 7-roH M. Steem, M%he sprei&ger Troy Stein Michael Sprenger ENS Activities Director EABC Chair of Major Expenditures 410, 44, 10, din Schools 0 DEFINING EXCELLENCE Current View & Neighborhood Aesthetics .. , . '. .1 11 Iu h . a., • ^ ) qy +ems_ f :�4 ,,»# 1P t _. .. L .v n Current , ? .. - ` s Scoreboard i If mom _ ..._. 101111 _ A t` , i. . - `°" Current P Scoreboards illillbiliallitilest 411 Ir— L .� ', 3 . .. .. . 1. , 1 .„ . t, . , .1 u� t -«z<, In •t hoois DEFINING EXCELLENCE Kuhlman Stadium Scoreboard Replacement Added Benefits: • Sport specific settings for Football, Track, Soccer, Lacrosse • Improved visibility throughout the stadium • Ability to add sponsor panels, and generate revenue to support student athletes • Improved wireless control capability iro Current Issues: rgT • Outdated technology, difficult, and costly to find parts it I • Football specific board . ;ONTDOWN I YDS TOGO 1 PTA.; • Clock timing failures due to current positioning and radio frequency interference �3 I f3 10 _" • Limited ability to attached modular components (signage, ancillary clocks, etc.) a.....ic r 2 I 1 3 E 3a , Clea Swine CAM ` ,« m 43 0«00« CISZI • Prn sc itais meg ra • ® ' M i- * • • ♦1.430«•I on k S♦♦ j i •••••• I. 0 V �, .� ,., (1) LIJ i : li 'P Z Eri Ili , , W J ' , ..... . 4 ,.., .,, 0 -: ..."0----4-- - - , illi _ • ii . ? . . . .. .. „ .....,,., .,, „_ Li. . ..? r 4V0044, .. ,t1.. 1111 V it 1101111” , A It At d'Ob in ill \ki‘W j r 01 a b 1(074. DEFINING EXCELLENCE Current View & Concept Comparison ....... -sookotc.-8 Li . 4, - '1* - --"""- -.'r : 4 - : modii 18ft . ____ _---.51.1. 1:2 3. 1 '''1,'; .,..:54::*7.: ' •.' ,.. ;*- ' .* 18ft. , ... - .--. :- 27ft ' ' , ...re/0' -,- 1- , ...... .......... r , 4aP l linlie6 DEFINING EXCELLENCE Concept View _. f Y i -,..--;-..,, .. o 4 ..FFa L. J LIit SPONSOR kir �n a 3 , 's DEFINING EXCELLENCE Kuhlman Stadium Scoreboard Concept „, . . ' '')-77.177', ,-'/ _ ... . / _.... N...--_, • 32 ' x 17 ' 544 sq ft Full Board SP SOR 4' x 32' 128 sq ft Sponsors OU .S - 1 C t I I 1 I -• . 17o high x32'0'wide TOL D01,111TF:aI I E{iiLl_i{h� a. I T�=ilr * The percent of advertising space •A 5ccenckx3?'0'wide lTussw� � „mat Channel logo is 128/544 = 23% of the board. '0103132 t I U l '0'h •Sponsor Panel[Backlit) SPONSOR 2 0'high x 32'0'wide (above Scoreboard) f •football Scoreboard €&2025 A V w/TNMCs Electronic Captions 8'0`high x 32'0'wide •SFc oar Panel[Non{iocklii 2'0'hioh x 32V wide [bebw Scoreboard[ 040 din \ 4" , , ,, - - 7,7, 111.01P 11574. . 00 DEFINING EXCELLENCE Courtney Field #1 Scoreboard ..„,A IE HOME OF EDINA BASEBALLSO 7z. ,q,iii <MOM AT BAT BALL STRIKE OUT H/E 0 _I _I 1 —I —1 / " —1 —I --1 r r - .-- /3 /0 cA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RUNS HITS ERR GUEST nnn n2n uuu u u t 3 n 1 Ju G 15 D- 3 3 6,0 ..58. 6 HORNETS Hon 200 02 1 3 2 CO H CO CORD CONCORDUSA.COM COCONCORD q 0 5 1 I 3 c.,' I rill rYmnrlient —-,,,... *PAscjrxr!Srrxt- yrrl AEI DIMENSIONT•/ • MO x 3fiT with 3 F1/4-202&A AFP.C.VIWATE „ _ .. ,_ :__,----•__ - 'll f •Ictwhatim,Parg4'Non eacip) 20'hipl•v 16.0.-m .Sp:Ttser Fsrte-1!Non Eackl \ ,..,Z f"-- .,..„. 1 / lex.,1 Stord.x.c,c1: 2'e higl•x;l50.wr.1.4 !below.koreboatth 11) (. " -)I.V P r . 0 , ,, _ — t( :-,n-- ) > 2 2 /, '4 q ., 7, , , v ;.„2 ......- / ' I,,,, ,„, ,,--:, i ,--,.,.. '11 /-:, ; .4,, , ../ :2, T /' i'P -' 1 L)....1 1.--' -): - ' ' J'-') , o kii00, �in DEFINING EXCELLENCE Kuhimar SStadium Scoreboard Current vs. Concept l Kuhlman Concept 32 ft .....34- Kuhlman Current 18ft 3 , '`` 2 ,.� 9.5 ft 17 ft 13 ft t....Et 1... < Courtney 36 ft *approximately to scale �l Op n di o '--„,,,,-.7E •x . DEFINING EXCELLENCE Kuhlman Stadium (Concept) 17'H x 32'W Courtney (Existing) 13'10"H x 36'W ' , , ,,-'a re HOME F EDINA BASEBALLi/lAlltilkopfr. AT BAT BALL STRIKE OUT H/E SPONSOR 1 1 =i I' C I- ] HORNETS I . 11 D GUEST • ~ ° 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 RUNS HITS ERR D ' c I ' I_ __I . i i i i I I i GUEST 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 3 0 5 IS 3 TiIL [ohm 4 Ti l;n o-R '=.DILLi'1 II.TE; TiIL >, HORNETS '-1 00 200 02 8 13 2 3 i iii ii a yc3CONCORD CONCORDUSA.COM C3coNcoRD SPONSOR Kuhlman Stadium (Current) 9.5'H x 18'W Dimensions Square�og tag Kuhlman (current) 9.5'H x 18'W 150 sq. ft.* <z›I i g U ISIS Kuhlman (concept) 17'H x 32'W 544 sq. ft. 1 142 $ !SALL II i Ilea t T Courtney (existing) 13'10"H x 36'W 498 sq. ft. ° 2E1 I , _ *square footage includes speakers Schocis%lilt"' . DEFINING EXCELLENCE :: District Comparisons (appx sq ft) x` a; Edina -- , ,1�M PRAIHI tf1GH SCI' W ' r`.' WAy�g1A HIGH SCHOOL E ,i1 1 10t / ,� +@ x _,_, suRh�swtt�: t z r4 1 # ITIE OF THE T OJA - t-e Cunning Tim: S L,L c e: ,' ,f � i' I Running e' K 1'' Ina IC "l �#' //////.— r'3 Jak4�s N 0.0 I fir✓ , '�"" .a P.I Ir'YYti.''� ,,,i, 'IMJ= •�_ r _•,,,..,.. - �'�.. �l '�lt � r, JaKf 51 ni / 3 Allstate ®n 2 f,,,31111-ro a 1s'3s ^M. �� - , E P 4- \ i r 1 .i_ti i I1 ei,Nr.. �;1ar f'al ,� �T',� C � ��� n . 1 r): LA ,-spn Hop .. 16.94 i4eo$ •��\ � _ �P T ! Ce FI �I ? �'� jai fi FI real- I �`� x `• �r, .lcoutts Rob 17.44 VI,.I,.n 5 5•Fuller` Edm 17.60 aa.e+ms '..1_.--. ' ' 0 1 I H HULL II<,�EH Ill11TI-I I•.t I.:i I E 1 . i • \ i'2 HEII;+EIII'Et 1iT 19111 I,' �y t -_ "de° I I,tI 11111' 1,{ 1 I � ,rI C.`4: HS TRACK K ISI L CI C pli i DELL ii t,11 1? IR oowx TOGO'uuow tall TO - oak,: h I t -.1,-1., - a.. 'F RUNNING TIME A t- . TI 1 STADIUM I` u11� I' I1 i1 11 , a� :>� zoo B B PATES STAR P''r'7 .;;:q, I ` t,Ep s,;® �u /V IJ71' GO SKIPPERS! /ti'�mpta•rdd a IS! 0. `I;' 151.5 Q 4 ,� Wayzata (about 1400sgft) Eden Prairie (about 1,400 sq ft) Minnetonka (about 1200 sq R) Burnsville (about 1600sgft) • Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998 PARCEL B: Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, except that part of said Lot 7, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northern line of said Lot 7, distant 11.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 7,thence southwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 7. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Section 810 and 850. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof,and subject,however,to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 4th day of May,1998. Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 18, 1998, FOR FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - NAMRON COMPANY (51xx LINCOLN DRIVE) Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust setting May 18, 1998, as hearing date for final rezoning and final plat approval for Namron Company at 51XX Lincoln Drive. Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. ORDINANCE NO 19984 ADOPTED - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION 460 - SIGNS Planner Larsen indicated the proposed amendment to Sign Ordinance Section 360 addresses two different issues. First, the amendment establishes standards for scoreboards within public parks, school properties and golf courses. The proposed standards provide for integral sponsor panels only at Braemar Park, Van Valkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Park Director Keprios has furnished a memo to be discussed later on the agenda with additional information. Second, the amendment provides language addressing the permitted locations for campaign signs.The proposed amendment was presented initially at the April 20, 1998, Council meeting and is before the Council with minor changes. Staff recommends adoption of the amendment. Member Maetzold made a motion to adopt Ordinance 19984, an Ordinance Amending Code Section 460-Signs with waiver of second reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO.19984 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNS IN PUBLICLY OWNED PARKS AND TO Page 28 41 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998 REGULATE THE PLACEMENT OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 1 of Subsection 460.05 of the.City Code is amended by adding the following regulations:` k "TYPE MAXIMUM MAXIMUM MAXIMUM NUMBER AREA HEIGHT Public Park One per frontage 24 sq. .ft. 6 ft. Identification SCOREBOARDS: A. Field#1 One 400 sq.ft. 20 ft. (Courtney Fields) (including sponsor panels B.Van Valkenburg Park, One per field 200 sq. ft. 20 ft. Kuhlman Field and (including Braemar Park except sponsor panels) Field#1 at Courtney Fields C. All other public parks, One per field 100 sq.ft. 20 ft. schools and golf courses Public park scoreboard 25% of scoreboard sponsor panels and other area" scoreboard advertising Section 2. Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 24 as follows: "Subd. 24. Scoreboard Sponsor Panels. Sponsor panels and other forms of advertising on scoreboards are permitted only at Braemar Park, VanValkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Scoreboard sponsor panels and other advertising on scoreboards shall be integral to the scoreboard and shall be constructed of the same materials as the scoreboard." Section 3. Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "A. No sign shall be placed within any street right-of-way other than, i) governmental signs which are official traffic regulatory signs or, ii) campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd.4 of this Subsection." Section 4. Paragraph B of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "B. No freestanding sign or any portion thereof other than governmental signs shall be placed within 20 feet of the traveled portion of any public street provided that campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection may be placed to within 10 feet of the traveled portion of a public street." Section 5. Subd 4 of Subsection 460.03 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4. Campaign Signs. Campaign signs shall comply with the following requirements: A. Campaign signs may be posted from August 1 in a state general election year until 10 days following the state general election subject to the applicable provisions of M.S. 211B.045. Such campaign signs shall conform with the Page 29 At3 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 4,1998 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to sign the aforementioned easement. Adopted this 4th day,of May,1998. .: ,,, t , ; Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. *WOODDALE PARK COMFORT STATION APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust approving the Park Board recommendation as follows: "That per the neighborhood's suggestion we try portable toilets this summer and see how it works and we will review it at the end of the summer and stop construction of the permanent facility at Wooddale Park." Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. BASEBALL SCOREBOARD ADVERTISING FOR COURTNEY BALL FIELD AT BRAEMAR PARK APPROVED Director Keprios explained at the April 14, 1998, Park Board meeting, the Edina Baseball Association made a proposal to raise funds through the sale of sponsor panels to replace four scoreboards at the Courtney bal fields in Braemar Park. One concern voiced by staff at the Park Board meeting was the size of the scoreboard being proposed for field #1 (9'4" x 36"). Currently the scoreboard on field # is 5' x 16'. Following a discussion, the Park Board voted to unanimously approve the large scoreboard and the proposed advertising concept for all four scoreboards. The Board's recommendation is consistent with Council's two-year trial basis - fund-raising through advertising - policy. Each advertising proposal requires prior approval of the Council,in accordance with City policy. Previously in the meeting, Ordinance No. 1998-4, an Ordinance Amending Section 460 - Signs,was adopted allowing advertising on certain scoreboards in the City. Member Hovland made a motion approving advertising as a means of fund raising to replace the four scoreboards at Courtney ballfields in Braemar Park, and to include the large scoreboard on field#1.Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes:Faust,Hovland,Kelly,Maetzold,Smith Motion carried. *TERMINATION OF TRAFFIC AGREEMENT FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold,seconded by Member Faust approving termination of Traffic Agreement for Centennial Lakes in Edina and the Minnesota Center in Bloomington. Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. *TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 (PATROL OFFICERS) APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Faust approving Teamsters Local #320 (Patrol Officers) Labor Agreement effective January 1,1998,through December 31,1999. Motion carried on rollcall vote-five ayes. Page 31 (1/"--" 1,1), ° o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION rc� � �12 ,y • .b lees To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: iv.A. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only = Date: May 7, 1998 Mgr. Recommends U To HRA To Council Subject: Amendments to Section 460 Action ❑ Motion of the City Code - Signs I I Resolution ® Ordinance (l Discussion Recommendation: Adopt attached Ordinance Amendments. Info/Background: The attached amendment addresses two different issues. First, the amendment establishes standards for scoreboards within public parks, school properties and golf courses. The proposed standards provide for integral sponsor panels only at Braemar Park, Van Valkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Please refer to the memo by John Keprios (Agenda Item VI. C.) for further information. Second, the amendment provides language addressing the permitted locations for campaign signs. This amendment is offered as a follow-up to the Council discussion on April 20, 1998. EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 1998- 04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNS IN PUBLICLY OWNED PARKS AND TO REGULATE THE PLACEMENT OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 1 of Subsection 460.05 of the City Code is amended by adding the following regulations: "Type Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height Public park identification One per frontage 24 sq. ft. 6 ft. Scoreboards A. Field#1 at Courtney One 400 sq.ft. 20 ft. Fields (including sponsor panels) B. Van Valkenburg Park, One per field 200 sq. ft. 20 ft. Kuhlman Field and (including sponsor panels) Braemar Park except Field# 1 at Courtney Fields C. All other public parks, One per field 100 sq. ft. 20 ft. schools and golf courses Public park scoreboard 25%of scoreboard sponsor panels and other area scoreboard advertising Section 2. Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 24 as follows: "Subd. 24. Scoreboard Sponsor Panels. Sponsor panels and other forms of advertising on scoreboards are permitted only at Braemar Park, VanValkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Scoreboard sponsor panels and other advertising on scoreboards shall be integral to the scoreboard and shall be constructed of the same materials as the scoreboard. Section 3. Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "A. No sign shall be placed within any street right of way other than i)governmental signs which are official traffic regulatory signs or ii) campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection Section 4. Paragraph B of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "B. No freestanding sign or any portion thereof other than governmental signs shall be placed within 20 feet of the traveled portion of any public street provided that campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection may be placed to within 10 feet of the traveled portion of a public street. Section 5. Subd. 4 of Subsection 460.03 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4. Campaign Signs. Campaign signs shall comply with the following requirements: A. Campaign signs may be posted from August 1 in a state general election year until 10 days following the state general election subject to the applicable provisions of M.S. 211B.045. Such campaign signs shall conform with the provisions of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon the right of way without the consent of the abutting property owner. B. Campaign signs posted in connection with elections held at times other than a state general election are subject to the following: i) Maximum Size-six square feet ii) Maximum Number-one sign for each candidate per lot frontage iii) Maximum Duration-60 days prior to the election until seven days following the election. iv) Location - Such campaign signs shall conform with the provisions of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon the right of way without the consent of the abutting property owner. Section 6. This ordinance is in full effect upon passage and publication. 0 i €2 HYi:ge !.4 t 1 •`��/BEM REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Smith and Members Agenda Item # VI. c. of the City Council From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park and Recreation Department Information Only ❑ Date: Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA April 29, 1998 X To Council Action ❑ Motion Subject: Baseball Scoreboards With ❑ Resolution Advertising - Courtney Ballfields, Braemar Park. X Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve the Park Board's recommendation to: "ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF THE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION TO USE SPONSOR PANEL ADVERTISING AS A MEANS OF FUNDING TO REPLACE THE FOUR SCOREBOARDS AT COURTNEY BALLFIELDS IN BRAEMAR PARK,WHICH INCLUDES THE LARGE SCOREBOARD ON FIELD NUMBER ONE." Background: At the April 14, 1998, Park Board meeting, the Edina Baseball Association made a proposal to raise funds through the sale of sponsor panels to replace four scoreboards at the Courtney Ballfields in Braemar Park. Although current City Code does not allow for any outdoor commercial advertising (billboards)in Edina on public or private land, there is an Ordinance Amendment on the City Council Agenda to address that issue. One of staffs concerns brought to the Park Board's attention regarding this proposal was the size of the scoreboard proposed for field#1 (9'4" X 36'). The current scoreboard on field#1 is 5' X 16'. However, as reflected in the Park Board minutes, after much discussion, the vote was unanimous to approve the large scoreboard and the advertising concept for all four scoreboards. This Park Board recommendation is consistent with the City Council's two-year trial basis fund-raising through advertising policy. In accordance with the current policy, each advertising proposal requires prior approval of the City Council. page 1 of 2 Ail •Y�O The cost to replace the scoreboards are as follows: FIELD # COST 1 $16,000 2 $6,000 3 $6,000 4 $6,000 The dimensions of the scoreboards and advertising panels at Courtney Fields are as follows: Scoreboard Dimensions Field# (including sponsor panels) Available Advertising Dimensions #1 11'4"X36' 2'X36' #2, #3 &#4 8'X 16' 2'X 16' The sponsor panels are professionally created by the scoreboard company. The proposed sponsor panels would be placed on the top of each scoreboard no larger than permitted by City Code. Examples of similar sponsor panels and scoreboard for field#1 are attached to this report. The field#1 scoreboard would have three sponsor panels side-by-side(approximately 2'X 12'each)located on the top of the scoreboard, whereas, the other three scoreboards would have only one sponsor panel per scoreboard. The proposed scoreboards and sponsor panels are in compliance with the proposed Sign Ordinance Amendment. The sponsor panels on field#1 would be less than 18%of the total scoreboard sign dimension. The sponsor panels on fields 2, 3 and 4 would be 25%of the total scoreboard sign dimension. The existing scoreboards at Courtney Bailfields are about 20 years old and in need of replacement. It would not be cost effective to repair the existing scoreboards. The initial advertising contract would be for a five year period. At the end of the five year period,the advertising contract would be negotiated and again require approval of the City Council. • page 2 of 2 �-C� ' .. ' . ... :„. ,At, ".'::, '0.;:. ' -" . -. 4. 1 • (:v , • 1 ' , ht '' COM}'.' TO Ct4ASe-i`. . , , „... „„.. ...........,. — , , , . . „ , . .„. 1 torklet .. .. - . ... ., Chaska Community Fields , . . ,‘,. At I : ',;•;:,-1'.'., '''.. Att. -..,. --...,:, 1. . ,. ‹0,- .,.-,- .!'lli,,,t J, - 7- '4',,,'-- ,4.,-4,4„.'..i - .• ,%.4 -14 t 4' --.?' . ' ,, ',', .. $ ' , ' ." '. , . , ''' ' ' ' - ' r. '' ' -•'''' -,- - . ' • ''''' ' ''''''' '' ` it A kii)ri,C '...'.r r r.‘"I.0014'.; . . . . ..,., , . , „*„..,.... ...............,......„..„....„, .................,_................_.....— . •'--"''-"7 77-"I''4 iit-?,.--...f.Olt*''',.'V'T 7%r-e-41 ,pe,'04.: :, ..i4„..,..,,,,',.:-:',,,,...il...7.1-.1„-,'-f,„7-,ky,7-,4.---4,4,-;'17„fk-:*:.-,,,k,,;,,,-;:(41-...i.,'?:-.:,":..,,-',': ,,,;' '''' '':4-•':,-;;I:-'• '..--1,''' •• ' ,,"1".''''•.L'er,'4".tz'',,-,94.';',.,',.-";-,'-.',.';",...;-...,-.7., ..'":„--'4..`',.,4,-;..:',,4.,,,,,',...M.'4.-`,,C,,r,.. '...,C.41...',W.,,,,,,,„r,,,,,k,.-1,0-,,,,-„,,t. .:,-,,t.„,,..,,r,'.-, ,-, • -.' -:-. .. -,.,.',--."-,i,,,:::::%-:II,..•,-.'4„L1141-',t,Ziilyli12,.'.. ,;;',.,;,,Ai,g,.;.f.-',,,,,..,.:„:„„.,,::::,--,:y,,,,.-'-',,,': ,-.•----',,,---'-,,,,',,','',:;,',/',i-,‘f;n',:','''4,;,41,4k,',,,A,•-,;-3,:y,';,-,;,,.. : . ..- I .;.; , . . "-, Armstrong High School Field A) 0 1 STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael D.Franzen DATE: April 22,2013 SUBJECT: Variance 2013-03 APPLICANT/ OWNER: Eden Prairie High School Booster Association/ School District 272 LOCATION: 17185 Valley View Road REQUEST: Accessory structure height variance from 30 to 48 feet in the Public Zoning District. BACKGROUND The property is currently zoned Public. The surrounding zoning is Public and R1-13.5 The site is guided Public/Quasi Public. The surrounding area is guided Public/Quasi Public and Low Density Residential. A scoreboard is an accessory structure. There is no maximum size for an accessory structure. The maximum height permitted is 30 feet. EXISTING SCOREBOARD The existing scoreboard is 200 square feet, 16 feet tall,and meets the 30 foot setback. PROPOSED SCOREBOARD V V The proposed scoreboard is 1,432 square feet and 48 feet tall. The sign conforms to the required 30 foot setback from property lines. CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE SCOREBOARD The City has a scoreboard at Round lake Park. It is 828 square feet and 33 feet tall. The scoreboard was built taller that approved plan with a 30 feet height. VARIANCE STANDARD Variances may be granted when they are"in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." X21 Staff Report—Variance # 2013-03 April 22, 2013 Page 2 • Furthermore variances may"be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance;the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; ,nd the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." Harmony with Purpose and Intent of Ordinance The requested variance is not in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance as it increases the height from 30 to 48 feet. The requested variance will alter the use of the prop:rty and will affect single family properties to the north. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan guides this property as public/quasi public. The variance does not change the use of the property and therefore the variance is consistent with the comprehensi e plan. Reasonable Use of the Property While it is reasonable to replace an existing conforming scoreboard, the requested varianceis a not reasonable use of the property. There is an existing scoreboard on the property that conforms to City requirements. Circumstances Unique to the Property and not Created by Landowner There are no circumstances unique to the property. The requested variance is created by the applicant and landowner. There are no physical constraints of the property that would preclu•e the construction of a scoreboard that conforms to the 30 foot height limitation. Will not alter Character of Locality The requested variance will alter the character of the locality. There are residential prope lies to the north that will be visually impacted by the height of the scoreboard. ALTERNATIVES 1. Keep the same design of the sign, but make it smaller and shorter to conform to the 30 foot height requirement. 2. Do a different design with the scoreboard and video screen side by side to confo to the 30 foot height requirement. REQUESTED COMMISSION ACTION 1. Recommended that the plans be revised to conform to the 30 foot maximum height requirement in the Public Zoning District, not approve the variance request for accessory structure height from 30 to 48 feet, and adopt Final Order 2013-03. ha( VARIANCE#2013-03 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION FINAL ORDER 2013-03 Applicant: Eden Prairie High School Booster Association/Eden Prairie High School ADDRESS: 17185 Valley View Road OTHER DESCRIPTION: VARIANCE REQUEST: Accessory structure height variance from 30 to 48 feet. The Board of Adjustments and Appeals for the City of Eden Prairie at a regular meeting thereof duly considered the above petition and after hearing and examining all of the evidence presented and the file therein does hereby find and order as follows: 1. All procedural requirements necessary for the review of said variance have been met. (Yes X No N/A). 2. Variance 2013 - 03 is: X granted modified denied 3. Findings and conditions are attached as Exhibit A. 4. This order shall be effective fifteen days after the decision of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals or on Ma'y , 2013;however, thisvariance shall lapse and be of no effect unless the erection or alternatives permitted shall occur within one (1) year of the effective date unless said period of time is extended pursuant to the appropriate procedures prior to the expiration of one year from the effective date hereof. 5. All Board of Adjustments and Appeals actions are subject to City Council Review. BOARD OF AD ST o0 AND APPEALS N/A=Not Applicable BY: t.. - Chair Da ... �" . • EXHIBIT A—FINDINGS 1. The granting of the variance is in harmony with intent and general purposes of the ordinance and the terms of the variance are consistent with the comprehensive plan. • The land is guided Low Density Residential and no guide plan change is propos;d. 2. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. • The requested variance will not alter the intended use of the property as a high s I hool campus. • There are large school buildings, large accessory structures (the bubble)athletic elds, and a football stadium. • The bubble is 65 feet tall and the school is 42 feet taller both of which were prey ously granted waivers in 1998. • The proposed scoreboard replaces and an existing scoreboard in the same locatio . • A scoreboard(accessory structure)is required for a football stadium. 3. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created .y the landowner. The property is unique for the following reasons: • The Eden Prairie High School is large campus on 72 acres with large buildings . d structures. • The property is comprised of a high school, activity center,multiple playing field., and field practice dome,and a football stadium. • The football stadium seats 3,000 and is constructed for people to watch football . d other field events. • To be visible to the viewing audience the scoreboard and video screen needs to be taller than 30 feet. • The accessory structure is located 106 feet from the closet single family home to t e north which is greater than the 30 foot minimum setback. • There are existing large conifer trees along the north property line that helps mitigi:te the visual impact of an accessory structure taller than 30 feet. • The accessory structure is located in an area that has other accessory structures tal er than • 30 feet. 4. The variance,if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. • The Eden Prairie High School is large campus on 72 acres with large buildings ane tall structures. • The property is comprised of a high school,activity center,multiple playing fields, and field practice dome, and a football stadium. • The football stadium seats 3,000 and is constructed for people to watch football an,. other field events. • To be visible to the viewing audience the scoreboard and video screen needs to be Aller than 30 feet. • The proposed scoreboard replaces an existing scoreboard in the same location. APPROVED MINUTES EDEN PRAIRIE PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY,APRIL 22, 2013 7:00 P.M., CITY CENTER Council Chambers 8080 Mitchell Road COMMISSION MEMBERS: John Kirk, Jon Stoltz, Katie Lechelt, Jacob Lee, Travis Wuttke, Steven Frank, Ann Higgins,Mary Egan STAFF MEMBERS: Mike Franzen, City Planner; Regina Rojas, City Planner; Stu Fox, Manager of Parks and Natural Resources; Rod Rue, City Engineer; Julie Krull, Recording Secretary I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE—ROLL CALL Vice Chair Lee called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Stoltz and Lechelt were absent. II. SWEARING IN OF NEW MEMBERS Franzen conducted the swearing in of Ann Higgins and Mary Egan. III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Kirk,to approve the agenda. Motion carried 6-0. IV. MINUTES A. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON MARCH 25,2013 Egan pointed out on page 3, first paragraph,her name was spelled incorrectly and should be Egan. MOTION by Wuttke, seconded by Kirk, to approve the minutes. Motion carried 3-0. Kirk,Higgins and Egan abstained. V. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC MEETINGS VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VARIANCE #2013-02 by Jensen/Stotesbery Pool Project Location: 17576 George Moran Drive Aar PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22,2013 Page 2 Request: • To permit a shoreland setback for an in-ground pool of 130' from the Ordinary High Water Level of Mitchell Lake (DNR classified Natural Environment waters.) City Code requires a 150' setback from the Ordinary High Water Mark. Christy Jensen, owner of the property, presented the proposal. She stated they are requesting the variance because they are putting in a pool. They need this variance because the house is at an angle. Ms. Jensen pointed out the pool would not be visible from the lake and no trees need to be removed. They would also take out the cement sport court. She stated they are also willing to work with the DNR to do shoreland restoration in the area. Vice Chair Lee asked Rojas to review the staff report. Rojas said they meet the three practical difficulties test and staff recommends approval. Vice Chair Lee opened the hearing up for public input. There was no input. Wuttke asked if the original language that was put in the agreement in 1989 could be changed so the Commission would not have to hear these requests, because other lots were given 100 feet. Franzen stated the language cannot be changed. Wuttke asked if there were any other DNR rulings in conjunction with this. Ms. Jensen said they do plan on doing infiltration around the pool and shoreland restoration. Wuttke stated he just wanted to make sure it was part of the plan. Ms. Jensen said it was in the plan. Vice Chair Lee asked Rojas what was going on with the sport court. Rojas stated it was there illegally and the project proponent will have it removed. Egan asked where the location for the pool equipment would be. Ms. Jensen said it would be along the side of the house and hidden from the lake. MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Wuttke,to close the public hearing. Motion carried 6-0. MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Wuttke, to recommend approval of the Final Order 2013-02 with the addition of the condition that the sport court be removed. Motion carried 6-0. B. VARIANCE#2013-03 by Eden Prairie High School Booster Association Location: 17185 Valley View Road Request: • A variance from City Code Section 11.03, Subd. 2, 11-11 e, Accessory Structure Maximum Height in the Public Zoning District from 30to 48 feet. Azo PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22, 2013 Page 3 Sarah Cheesman, of 6782 Boyd Ave, representing the Eden Prairie Booster Association, presented the proposal. She pointed out the current scoreboard is obsolete. She stated there are three ways it will impact the community. The first is that it will enhance the fan participation experience. The second is that it can be used in conjunction with fund raisers. And third, it can be used as hands on curriculum. She showed a power point presentation of the scoreboard. The project proponent showed photos of the structure. She pointed out the homes in the area are blocked by trees so the sign would not be intrusive. The current scoreboard is 30 years old and many other cities have this type of structure. The scoreboard is on school property and would not impact homeowners. If the sign is altered and made shorter,the potential for vandalism would increase and if it is made a different size it will not be aesthetically pleasing. Mike Grant, 6840 Rosemary Road, Activities Director and Head Football Coach at Eden Prairie High School, passed out a letter from the school district, which states they fully support this video display board. Mr. Grant said in the past,the High School was questioned about having three turf fields and because of the weather we are currently having,this is a good idea. Mr. Grant said that as Activities Director, he knows what this can do for all activities and not just football. It is an opportunity to celebrate the whole school. It is student driven and can be tied into the curriculum because they will be managing the video display boards. The Boosters each year donate $65,000 and are the life blood of the program; they are funding this. Wayzata already has this board and Chaska and Chanhassen are thinking about doing it too. It will be an enhancing experience. The pine trees were put up to block the homeowners' view when the bubble was put up. Mr. Grant stated it looks like the new scoreboard belongs here;this is what the kids get excited about. He said what the City is doing at Round Lake; that is what we are trying to do here. Franzen said the scoreboard and video screen is an accessory structure. When staff first met with the applicant,three processes were identified.A code amendment would take 6 months. A waiver process would be about 120 days and tradeoffs or benefits to the City need to be identified for an exception. The variance route is 45 days. There is a three part test for variance requests based on reasonable use, unique circumstances,and neighborhood character.Based on the information provided the staff recommendation is for the commission to adopt a final order for denial. If the commission wanted to approve the variance the hearing would have to be continued for in order for the staff to prepare findings. Vice Chair Lee opened the hearing up for public input. There was no input. Frank asked if the City has heard anything from the north residential properties. dka7 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22, 2013 Page 4 Ken Erickson, of 16540 N. Oak Crest Court, said they are north of the property and his wife talked with the neighbors regarding the sign. They were in favor of it and felt if anything it would reduce the noise. He also pointed out his son was involved with Eagle Vision News and would be in support of this. Frank asked if the lights would impact him. Mr. Erickson said no, they would not. The project proponent said the lighting is LED. Franzen said notices were sent out 500 feet and there were no objections. Wuttke asked what impact LED light emission would have on traffic. Jerry Morton, of 7655 Washington Avenue, Edina, electrician from Daktronics, said the scoreboard will only be on during game time. Otherwise the screens will go blank. There should be no impact with traffic. Wuttke asked about the speaker system and would it be more directional. The project proponent said yes, it is more directional to the stadium and this is a positive thing. Wuttke said about 40%of the area on the sign is for sponsorship. The project proponent said that is correct because they will pay to have their name up there. They will be all local Eden Prairie businesses. Wuttke asked if the City was okay with this. The project proponent said they cannot advertise certain products but can have sponsors on the Board. Franzen confirmed they can have sponsorship on the board but no advertisement. Vice Chair Lee asked if the Boosters own and run the scoreboard. The project proponent confirmed the Boosters own and run the scoreboard. Frank said in regard to the height, if it was held to the 30 feet standard what impact would it have.The project proponent said they will lose the Eden Prairie sign on top and also the sponsors which are needed for support. The size would have to be changed and it would reduce revenue. Mr. Grant said if you go to any stadium that has this type of scoreboard, when spectators are looking at this you don't want them to be looking down on this. That is why the height should stay as it is. He stated the speaker is where the EP is. Mr. Morton said it is a very clean sign. The sponsors want their name to be seen. Egan asked if the speaker on top could be lowered. Mr. Grant said the speakers should be at the highest level to be efficient. Egan asked again if the speaker can be lowered. Mr. Morton said the idea is to have sound go through the stadium so you don't have hot spots. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22, 2013 Page 5 Kirk asked if asked if this would impact commercial signage. Franzen said this is an accessory structure and not a sign and would not set a precedence. Kirk said he has concerns with the process. He said there are two issues. Do we want the scoreboard the size as it is and what is the correct process for this project. Kirk said he understands the urgency but wants to make sure the process is done correctly. Higgins said she is also concerned about height and the correct process. Vice Chair Lee asked if other sports, besides football,will be using this. The project proponent said yes, other sports will utilize it and it will also be used for community events and pointed out the opportunities are endless. Lee asked if people will have to be hired to train people how to use this. Mr. Grant said Detronics would train the people. Also, a teacher will facilitate students to participate in this. Bill McDonald, of 15071 Steller Lane, and past president of the Boosters said he had a daughter in Eagle Vision news and went on to college and led classes with the experience she received at Eden Prairie High School. He said he believes the scoreboard is where we want to take the community. Vice Chair Lee asked about cost and what happens if you have to take the scoreboard apart. Mr. Morton said there are five components to this. They are all connected and can be taken down. The project proponent said the cost of the sign is about $459,000. Frank asked about purpose and intent of the ordinance. Franzen said the height is not in harmony with the ordinance. Franzen added that if the commission wants to approve a variance it has to be based on meeting the three part test. Findings must be established and that is the critical part. If the Planning Commission approves any variance,there is a 15 day grace period for appeal. Higgins asked about process and said it sounds like there are alternatives to the variance process and asked what process would be better. Franzen said code amendment first, PUD second, and variance third. Frank said this might set precedence for other schools in Eden Prairie. Franzen said we have an obligation to treat all requests in a fair manner. Vice Chair Lee asked the commission if this variance satisfies the three part test. Higgins said code amendment is the correct process. Wuttke said he is leaning towards a code amendment. Wuttke said perhaps the ordinance we are putting it under is not appropriate. The project proponent pointed out the scoreboard will have to come down regardless if this is approved or not. 4a1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22, 2013 Page 6 Kirk said the question should be the size of it. Egan agrees with Higgins and is questioning if getting a variance is the way to go. Franzen said the Commission should decide what reasonable use needs to be. Justify why it needs to be taller and larger than ordinance allows. The Commission has the ability to disagree with what the City staff suggests. Kirk asked if you can do mitigation through variance and waiver. Franzen said yes, it can be done through variance. Kirk said if the Commission wants to approve this we need a defined set of findings,which we do not have, and asked if that is what we need the continuance for. Franzen said that is correct and it could be brought back at the May 13th meeting with findings. Frank said he agrees with a continuance. Vice Chair Lee said he was concerned about setting precedence and used the baseball scoreboard as an example, if they would come forward and want a video on it. Kirk suggested we get a feel for where the Commission stands on this. Wuttke said he is concerned with setting precedence and having some ordinance change with regards to height, square footage and sponsors. Higgins agreed with Wuttke. Kirk also agrees with Wuttke and thinks the best way to handle this request is through an ordinance change. Frank applauds the initiative but agrees the ordinance approach is the best way. Egan also agrees with the code amendment. She asked if the project could be done in phases. The project proponent said it could not be done in phases. Lee said he disagrees with the Commission and feels the variance route is the way to go because he sees this as reasonable. He does not want to hold this up but also feels 120 days is not that long. The project proponent said 120 days is long and could have a negative impact in regards to sponsors. Frank said we can have an ordinance change or continuance of the project and asked if it is worth the extra time. Franzen said as long as the commission establishes findings for approval and address the 3 part test,then the commission is following the code and state law. Franzen suggested applicant could think about it for two weeks and come back with findings to support a variance. The project proponent asked what findings need to be gathered for the variance approval. She also asked if the Commission wants to see the portable sign, if Daktronics can supply it. Kirk felt that was not necessary and is more concerned with the process. He thinks it would be positive for the City,but wants to do it right. A30 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES April 22, 2013 Page 7 Franzen said it sounds like the applicant would be willing to come back in 2 weeks. Kirk also agreed that to get the findings documented, it would have to be continued. Lee asked if this could be taken to the City Council. Franzen stated that the code established the commission as the board of appeals. The City Council role is to hear only appeals from a commission decision. Frank said the best route would be a 2 week continuance. Kirk believes if everything was documented correctly, it could be done with the variance. Wuttke said he would like to see an ordinance change. The project proponent asked to please not slow down their process to make an ordinance change. She does not believe another party will come forward to have a sign like theirs because they do not have the funding. Vice Chair Lee said he would like a variance over the code amendment. Wuttke said he prefers a code amendment. Higgins also prefers a code amendment. Kirk would like the variance with the right set of findings; Frank concurred. Egan is leaning towards a code amendment. MOTION by Kirk, seconded by Wuttke,to recommend a continuance to the May 13, 2013 meeting. Motion carried 6-0. Franzen said in regards to findings and conclusions,they will work with the project proponent. There was a 5 minute break, resuming at 9:17 p.m. VIII. PLANNERS' REPORT A. NEW MEMBER APPOINTMENT TO SW LRT CAC Katie Lechelt was appointed by the City Council to be a member of the Citizens Advisory Committee for the Southwest Light Rail. Her first meeting will be Thursday. B. FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS FROM GLOBAL GREEN RELATING TO SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE GOLDEN TRIANGLE AREA Franzen stated for those participating in the Global Green discussion for creating a sustainable neighborhood in the Golden Triangle Area,the report and recommendations are in the packet. C. LISC CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE Molly Koivumaki, Housing and Community Service Manager for the City of Eden Prairie, said they are looking for volunteers to spend time in 4—2 hour workshops. These workshops will look at areas for redevelopment around Eden A3 May 13, 2013 Page 2 MOTION Frank, seconded by Lee,to approve the minutes as amended. Motion carried 5-0. Lechelt and Stoltz abstained. IV. INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS V. PUBLIC MEETINGS VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VARIANCE#2013-03 by Eden Prairie High School Booster Association (Continued Item) Location: 17185 Valley View Road Request: • A variance from City Code Section 11.03, Subd. 2, 11-11e, Accessory Structure Maximum Height in the Public Zoning District from 30 to 48 feet. Sarah Cheesman, of 6782 Boyd Ave, representing the Eden Prairie Booster Association, presented the proposal. She wanted to thank everyone and stated they are here to present the new scoreboard that was redesigned. At the last meeting, findings were that the scoreboard would enhance the fan participation experience. The second is that it can be used in conjunction with fund raisers. And third, it can be used as hands on curriculum. She stated this scoreboard would not be a burden to tax payers as it would be all funded by the booster association. At the last meeting it was suggested to reduce the size of the scoreboard. She stated they changed the height of the board to 43.6 feet, from 48 feet, and made two significant compromises. The first is making the sign 8 feet from bottom up, versus the original 10 feet. The second was to move the top identifying banner lower and to straighten it out. Ms. Cheesman stated this sign would not alter the character of the property. She would like an approval of this variance request tonight. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen to review the staff report. Franzen stated since the last meeting he gathered findings in regards to this proposal. There are 18 findings and they are listed in the staff report. Chair Stoltz asked Commission members to comment on what was discussed at the last meeting since he was absent. Frank stated the members felt a precedence might have been set if this was approved at the last meeting. Stoltz asked Franzen if there is a need to be concerned about setting precedence. Franzen said no, as long as the three part test is satisfied, plus he added, this is an accessory structure. Kirk commented they were also concerned if they were working the process correctly. They were discussing variance, ordinance change and a code amendment as the different processes; and commented that the variance option would be the quickest. Chair Stoltz asked if Kirk was okay with going with the Aad May 13, 2013 Page 3 variance process. Kirk stated he is becoming more comfortable with the variance process after reading the findings in the packet. Kirk also commented he understands this is not a sign variance but an accessory structure. Chair Stoltz asked Franzen what the criteria was for advertising on this structure. Franzen stated the name of products or services cannot be advertised, just the sponsor's name. Chair Stoltz asked the Commission members if everyone was happy with the height of the structure now and asked if there were any concerns. The members concurred they were okay with the height of the structure. Chair Stoltz said he is concerned with the lowering of the structure and said it opens it up to vandalism. Egan said the height of the structure was an adjunct to the conversation Commission members had. The main issue was setting precedence. But now that this is an accessory structure, it changes the argument. Higgins agrees with Egan. Frank said he liked the original design better, but was concerned about setting precedence, which has been addressed, so that is not an issue. Kirk said he prefers the new design over the old design. Chair Stoltz polled the audience to see which sign they were in favor of;the majority was for the first design that was previewed at the last meeting. Franzen said because the motion for final order has 43.6 feet,that would have to be changed if the Commission wanted the 48 feet. Chair Stoltz stated he likes the first drawing better and the fact that it is higher off the ground. Lechelt said she is concerned about setting precedence,but since it is an accessory structure and not a sign, she is okay with the original design. Chair Stoltz opened the meeting up for public input. Mike Grant, 6840 Rosemary Road, Activities Director and Head Football Coach at Eden Prairie High School, said he supports the first drawing and is also concerned about safety and vandalism on the field. He stated, given the context of the other buildings on school ground,this would not be out of place. We would like to showcase our students and all of the programs at the school. MOTION by Lechelt, seconded by Lee,to close the public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. MOTION by Lechelt, seconded by Lee,to adopt Final Order 2013-03 with approval of the height of 48.0 feet and 43.6 feet. Motion carried 7-0. CITY OF BURNSVILLE Meeting Date: 4/22/2014 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR BACKGROUND Item Number: 5. PRESENTER(S): Chris Slania,Planner Jeff Marshall,Athletic and Activity Director ITEM: Application for Independent School District 191 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to Replace the Existing Stadium Scoreboards and a Variance to the signage requirements at Burnsville High School located at 600.West Highway 13; Consider Findings of Fact, Conditional Use Permit and Variance POLICY DECISION/ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Adopt the Findings of Fact and approve the Conditional Use Permit and Variance as revised and recommend-d by the Planning Commission. FACTS: At the April 14,2014 Planning Commission meeting the Commission discussed the Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Variance for the scoreboards at Burnsville High School. Staff outlined the application and showed images of the scoreboards requested. The Commission reviewed the proposal and held the public hearing. Jeff Marshall,Athletic and Activity Director for Independent School District 191,was available to answer questions of the Commission. Mr.Marshall indicated the scoreboard could potentially be used for graduatio ceremonies,marching band and dance competitions. The stadium is also rented out to semi-professional teams and other organizations for games and tournaments. Mr.Marshall confirmed the sponsorship panels will be backlit but only when the scoreboard is on and the video display is in operation. The panels would not be illuminated if the scoreboard was not in use. ISSUES: The Commission's discussion on the project included the recommended conditions and the intent •f the conditions as well as the dimensions of the structure. Commissioners had differing opinions on the num er of events the scoreboard could be utilized as well as the appropriate size and height of the scoreboard. As part of the recommendation to the Council the Commission eliminated the following condition from the staff report: The use of the video display shall be limited to no more than 55 events per calendar year. And revised the following: The use of the video display shall be in conjunction with events in the stadium and limited to no mor than 38 45 minutes prior to the start of each event and no more than 4-8 30 minutes following the completion •f the event. Staff is comfortable with the revised conditions as the change does provide a restriction on when the display an (and cannot)be used so it is clear to all parties. A3 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR BACKGROUND Meeting Date:4/22/2014 PAGE 2 Item Number: 5. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission voted 3 —2(Bradrick and Thomas dissenting)to recommend to the City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment to replace the existing stadium scoreboards and Variance to the signage requirements at 600 West Highway 13,with the following conditions: 1. The height of the scoreboard shall be limited to 45 feet as not to exceed the height of the high school building. 2. The use of the video display shall be in conjunction with events in the stadium and limited to no more than 45 minutes prior to the start of each event and no more than 30 minutes following the completion of the event. 3. The sponsorship panels on both scoreboards shall be static. No scrolling, flashing, continuous movement or other motion shall be permitted. 4. Separate sign permits are required prior to installation. Commissioners Bradrick and Thomas had concerns with the size and scale of the stadium scoreboard and the visual impact on the site. ATTACHMENT(S): 04/14/2014 PC Packet 04/14/2014 PC Minutes Findings of Fact CS A-35 CITY OF BURNSVILLE DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT Application of Independent School District 191 AND DECISIIN for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to replace the existing stadium scoreboards and a Variance to the signage requirements at Burnsville High School located at 600 West Highway 13. FINDINGS OF FACT On April 22, 2014, the Burnsville City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the above application of Independent School District 191 for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to replace the existing stadium scoreboards and a Variance to the signage requirements at Burnsville High School located at 600 West Highway 13.The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the application. The Applicant was present and the Planning Commission heard testimony from any and all interested persons wishing to speak at the meeting. The City Council now makes the following Findings of Fact and Decision: 1. The subject property is zoned R1 (Single Family Residential) 2. The property is designated as Low Density Residential in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 3. Public and parochial schools are Conditional Uses within the R-1 District. 4. The surrounding properties to the north,east and west are zoned I-1 (Industrial Park). The school is bordered by Hwy 13 to the south. 5. The high school is occupies 56 acres. The land is utilized for school buildings, parking lots, baseball/softball, and tennis facilities as well as a stadium for other sports. 6. In 1998 ISD 191 received a CUP Amendment to reconstruct the stadium at the Burnsville High School which included a new lighted football/soccer field,press box,team room, ticket buildings and bleacher seating for 4,000 spectators. 7. The proposal enlarges the scoreboard structure by adding a live-video display monitor and sponsorship panels to the sides and top. The video display monitor and sponsorship panels will be visible from the frontage road and Hwy 13. 8. The existing(and proposed)scoreboard location is 600 feet from the frontage road and 685 feet from Hwy 13. 9. There will be no changes to the building,lighting, landscaping or parking. 10. The request is reasonable considering the intended use,location and setback of the scoreboards. 11. The variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. DECISION Applicant's request for a Conditional Use Permit Amendment to replace the existing stadium scoreboards and a Variance to the signage requirements at Burnsville High School located at 600 West Highway 13, is hereby approved, in accordance with the plans reviewed, modified,approved,and recorded in Clerk's Document No.D-14- Adopted this 22nd day of April,2014. CITY OF BURNSVILLE By: Elizabeth B. Kautz,Mayor ATTEST: Macheal Collins, City Clerk 2 k3.1 UNAPPROVED MINUTES OF THE APRIL 14,2014 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 4. Public Hearin, — Ai u lication for Inde u endent School District 191 for a Conditional U.e Permit Amendment to re lace the existin, stadium scoreboards and a variance to t e signage requirements at Burnsville High School located at 600 West Highway 13. Chris Slania presented an overview of the proposed application and showed images of the scoreboar.s requested. Slania advised staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Variance for signage. � At 7:28 p.m. Julik opened the public hearing. Jeff Marshall,Athletic and Activity Director for Independent School District 191,was available to answer questions of the Commission. Mr. Marshall indicated the scoreboard could potentially be used for graduation ceremonies, marching band and dance competitions. The stadium is also rented out to semi- professional teams and other organizations for games and tournaments. Mr. Marshall confirmed the sponsorship panels will be backlit but only when the scoreboard is on and the video display is in operation. The panels would not be illuminated if the scoreboard was not in use. At 7:35 p.m.Julik closed the public hearing. The Commission's discussion on the project included the recommended conditions and the intent of the conditions as.well as the dimensions of the structure. Commissioners had differing opinions on tF.e number of events the scoreboard could be utilized as well as the appropriate size and height of die scoreboard. As part of the recommendation to the Council the Commission eliminated the following condition fro the staff report: The me of the video display shall be limited to no more than 55 events per calendar year. And revised the following: The use of the video display shall be in conjunction with events in the stadium and limited to o more than 3$ 45 minutes prior to the start of each event and no more than -1-0 30 minut s following the completion of the event. Singh moved and Taheri seconded a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit Amendment to replace the existing stadium scoreboards and a variance to the signage requirements at 600 West Highway 13,with the following conditions: 1. The height of the scoreboard shall be limited to 45 feet as not to exceed the height of the high school building. 2. The use of the video display shall be in conjunction with events in the stadium and limited to no more than 45 minutes prior to the start of each event and no more than 30 minutels following the completion of the event. 3. The sponsorship panels on both scoreboards shall be static.No scrolling, flashing, continuous movement or other motion shall be permitted. 4. Separate sign permits are required prior to installation. Ayes: Julik, Singh,Taheri. Nays: Bradrick,Thomas None. Motion passed(3-2). 401 VVa tato Hi h School - Wayzata, MN F— 5'6" 1 1 ,.6" 1 Football Display 4'6' I 21' ' I 1— -4 Decorative ID Arch On ©© H1SCHOm` !�(11 Custom Bacl-lit Arch \�Tll drojanlogo )L ID Panels0 , Two 12) Bacfrlii ID Panels Video Display HOME OF THE TROJANS. ':..,ne 11) D'a'r,`J ileo Display _ �t Anchor Partner Panels ANCHOR ► �. -1. ANCHOR Pour l4i Nonitt 'Nartner Panel, 366" PARTNER �''''?,-.47;e, 4'''m s�. '• 4 PARTNER Founding Partner Panels 1 ' i �� ‘, . . Four (µt Nordic Fortner Portals r �' 5'1.1 A.4'6"w t, ,IX It Football Message Display Scoreboard ANCHOR - -47 ANCHOR One (1)Message Display PARTNER 3 tt ` PARTNER .. ems'. GUEST HOME QUEST FOUNDING 21 : 4cy :4 FOUNDING 1 1 F:�kiD 7 PhRTFIER JCu 11 lhi TO GO E,HLL OH li TR z FOUNDING ��� t•" 'j FOUNDING 0 F%PP IER 2 mit/. 1 1 PAM IEP . T m TL1L CIL rn 't `"....., y �, Page 12 aIot/ /211/41/4. 4.tZtei deXOC/5 210 County Road 101 N PO BOX 660 Wayzata,MN 55391 Wayzata Public Schools is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the installation of a multi-sport scoreboard at the Wayzata High School located at 4955 Peony Lane North in Plymouth. The current scoreboard was purchased in 1999 and installed in 2000. The current scoreboard uses incandescent lamp technology which is no longer current. Upcoming laws regarding the manufacturing and sales of incandescent lamp is already creating a supply issue for upkeep. Additionally, the current scoreboard was designed specifically for football. The stadium at Wayzata High School provides home field hosting for a variety of sports which find the existing scoreboard either inadequate or unusable. The display consists of 4 segments: a Scoreboard —The scoreboard consists of an electronic display panel, 10' tali by 21'6" wide. This module is completely programmable and capable of being configured to display scoring and/or timing information for all current and future sports that my use the facility. • Video Display—The video display consists of a high definition color video display panel, 14'9"tall by 21'6"wide. This panel is capable of displaying any prepackaged video content as well as live video. This panel will be used mostly to highlight the many other activities and accomplishments of WHS students throughout the district. • Sponsor Panels—In accordance with city ordinance 21650.05 Subd. 21,organizations sponsoring the scoreboard will be installed on either side of the video display and scoreboard panels. The combination of signage equals 25.8%of the total square footage in which 30%is allowed by the ordinance. These panels will not be back-lit. • School ID Panels—"WAYZATA HIGH SCHOOL",3'6"tall by 30'6"tall,"HOME OF THE TROJANS",2'6" tall by 30'6" wide and a 4 foot diameter Trojan logo will top off the structure. This signage will be backlit and on only when the scoreboard is in use. The new structure will be constructed on the east side of the field meeting the requirement of"not visible from adjacent rights-of-way" as well as any residential properties to the east, north or south of the site. Existing screening is already provided for properties to the west. The old scoreboard and all structure will be removed as part of this project and all soils restored. Square footage calculations: Scoreboard 287.625 Sq. Ft. U E i . E u 7 Video Display 215.000 Sq. Ft. Sponsor Panels 242.750 Sq. Ft. ?IP "WAYZATA HIGH SCHOOL"panel 106.750 Sq. Ft. "HOME OF THE TROJANS"panel 76.250 Sq. Ft. CnYOFPLYMOUTH Trojan Logo 12.600 Sp. Ft. cOMMUNRYDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TOTAL 940.975 Sq.Ft. Page 11 rp) c;tyof Agenda . 1 2 Plymouth Number: 4cpiio Q1;ty to Life To: Laurie Ahrens, City Manager REGULAR Prepared by: Marie Darling, Senior Planner COUNCIL MEETING Reviewed by: Barbara Thomson, Planning Manager and Steve Juetten, March 27,2012 Community Development Director Conditional Use Permit for a scoreboard to be installed Item: at the Wayzata High School athletic stadium at 4955 Peony Lane (2012011) 1 . ACTION REQUESTED: Move to adopt the attached resolution approving a conditional use permit for a scoreboard at Wayzata High School,as recommended by the Planning Commission. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a 4/7 vote of the City Council. 2. BACKGROUND: At the March 21, 2012 meeting. the Planning Commission conducted the public hearing on this request and subsequently voted unanimously to recommend approval of the request. The applicant was present in support of the request. No one from the public requested to speak. A copy of the Planning Commission meeting minutes and report is attached. After the Planning Commission report was published, staff found a mathematical error in the applicant's proposal. The exhibit submitted indicates 949.4 square feet and the narrative indicates 940.9 square feet. In order to avoid any discrepancies as the school district enters the final design phase for the scoreboard, staff presented a revised resolution to the Planning Commission that approves a scoreboard with no more than 950 square feet and 50 feet in height. Notice of the Planning Commission's public hearing was published in the city's official newspaper and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site 12 days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the notification area map is attached. Development signage remains on the site. 3. BUDGET JMPACT: Not Applicable. 4. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Minutes Planning Commission Report with Attachments Resolution Approving the Conditional Use Permit Page 1 ligr •kms i��vl , eei i. f J __T., ¢ t 1j ir- G� .J r*r::- s 1 7} • '\,4. r m°• i. jttC :# art' :F3' 44.4.1 /.a= s # s _ { � ' r. '-41: f 4 e t4. ,, j ro 7 f ,e f w t :(_r rr,,f .''t t --'r. ?tk s • L i ` if'.'-.*+,7:- n}' -'•$..' s a - ', 9 • �� i ' ._ p y_ �'�' x 9 ' - -s,a, "e, - ' I� 'fit .. y f T 4't4 - - t.'''' like% yr +� iw4/4 jjr �' S1 t nI y, .t i q .. b ? '{! 111 '.... �... ; ^ .. i. ! ✓,�=' ,� �' :: yam'• - .,� =3`; s' 1 .e. L� `< f ,-,..s }a �S} ' i...,-...• Y` i. d 4.„,-.d _ J v' r rn _ ,1 j ll r t J ✓ 1/40.,,, .y„r.. ".'i" e , 0,...-v-?, + s}t i's er_ {. a q r 3 ?t1 ,r d :,• ., �`\l f''-r:- J �i''• �i r ;li}• ; qer r y ,, ._ i, J t r" ; + i .,--.<• � am' v ?� ..._-_.,1"4'7.''',1,::4 `SyT, -ar' •t# Erol. J f• iit t T is; • y � 1 1 t"'t3+.x _'' - .... - ..51.1... (,ti , ' .,� \ tri r . ' '� i.‘" ..tt--...,�-- R f;. �, 'Q%''y , , '.: c ° i �' a, [S a -•.t.4 '-'...,-.:,---'----10-,... ,i- p•—•(, y'"-1::44 [t y� � a ' P +"k• s m "� .L l+1� ',` R�X � fit r : f 1 -`f y'�`• ei.-+� �� �. •�s. .4.14•. fry, • :�tMr"~ 7,s(r ;� • � N � Q' ■ E :44,..,,,,,,„; \,11 !' r 1 i1( lj "' � Jr �! 3Vs' • ., fj r*'LIt !l�,'a%`; -- , •` .41x' '-, "1..4, -- ', r-44 _ r•j' ,p.1--•/" -'" "r $ Jba s ��i5��.., y1 i E }y�1 {�• yY ) . . ro"i:`"a"�= 19: 114 _ lel 5�••.`-,'.--------i, ' .. a n `'rc. '1-7. - 1,, 12�t:f: . .-.. +r � 404 .i4b� r .�.-.. ,.' .+!" `, � _r. ` :' , tily^ a • II 4 �t,.'#��itsh,a til: , + 0'� a Z�r�` ' lsc' + ' !v ; , , 3. �i-:.‘4 � -'- jYl 1 i,,s�' ,{�,. 11 . 1X G + , �t,}';I.-4 , 1 „.c116114:42. ' 14 fir' �., '�- .' -`SS- ~.. r i sIrA f.—tit„�t'llr rl&i.1 }+�mr.'e.��”���: P��a;acr �f aiESExi.$� ' 4:411!--21r7":"" t?el -,H' Aerial Photograph - 2012011 ;1?) City of Plymouth, Minnesota 500 250 0 500 1,000 1,500 —�r•i.�� w1 .�w Feet Page 20 Draft Planning Commission Minutes March 21,2012 Page 5 B. WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT (2012911) Chair Davis introduced the request by the Wayzata School District for a conditional use permit to allow a scoreboard to be installed at Wayzata High School. Senior Planner Darling gave an overview of the staff report. Senior Planner Darling said a revised resolution for a scoreboard no more than 950 square feet and up to 50 feet in height has been provided. Commissioner Anderson asked if the Wayzata School District application includes commercial speech. Senior Planner Darling said the content on the sign has to be consistent with the public institution zoning district. She said if the council approves the amendment, it would have to be consistent with those text amendments and would be able to have commercial speech; if not approved, it would have to be consistent with existing language in the public institution district. Commissioner Anderson asked if the proposed sign is larger than allowed under the new ordinance. Senior Planner Darling said the proposed sign is 949 square feet and the ordinance allows 950 square feet. Chair Davis introduced Dan Carlson,representing the Wayzata Public Schools. Mr. Carlson said the public address system can be connected and synchronized with the video. Mr. Carlson said they do not envision Wayzata High School having a two-minute time out with a Coca-Cola commercial. Mr. Carlson said they envision for example, ABC Plumbing as a couple hundred dollar sponsor who wants to get their name on the scoreboard and support their program. He said this would be an opportunity for someone who can't afford large sponsor panels, but may have an opportunity to do something lower key. Mr. Carlson said Wayzata School does not advertise in their gyms. Mr. Carlson apologized for the calculation in size error, and said they are still within the 950 square feet. Mr, Carlson said they want to create an atmosphere that people will want to come to and not be bombarded with advertising and appreciated Commissioner Anderson's comment. Chair Davis opened and closed the public hearing as there was no one present to speak on the item. Chair Davis said the scoreboard is not to be visible from any right-of-way or street. He asked if the scoreboard would have to be screened if the golf course is developed and there are streets. Senior Planner Darling said the scoreboard would be considered legally nonconforming if the golf course develops and the scoreboard became visible from the street. She pointed out there is a row of mature trees between the stadium and the golf course which wrap around the stadium. Senior Planner Darling said at ground level where the scoreboard would be constructed, existing Page 2 /4-3 Draft Planning Commission Minutes March 21,2012 Page 6 trees would screen,even in winter. She said from the top of the bleachers you can see the roof of the Gramercy building in Medina over the tree tops. Chair Davis clarified that in the event the golf course and streets were built,the school would not be required to take down the scoreboard. Senior Planner Darling answered affirmatively. MOTION by Commissioner Nelson, seconded by Commissioner Robinson, to approve the request by the Wayzata School District for a conditional use permit and revised resolution to allow a scoreboard to be installed at Wayzata High School. Roll Call Vote. 6 Ayes. MOTION approved unanimously. Page 3 44d CITY OF PLYMOUTH RESOLUTION No. 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT (ISD 284) FOR A SCOREBOARD TO BE INSTALLED AT THE ATHLETIC STADIUM AT THE WAYZATA HIGH SCHOOL AT 4955 PEONY LANE (2012011) WHEREAS, Wayzata School District(ISD 284) has requested approval of a conditional use permit to install a scoreboard with no more than 950 square feet in area,no more than 50 feet in height and a video display panel for the property legally described as follows: Lot 1,Block 1,Wayzata Senior High School Addition,Hennepin County,Minnesota. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Wayzata School District(ISD 284) for a conditional use permit to allow a scoreboard to be installed at the athletic stadium for Wayzata High.School located at 4955 Peony Lane, subject to the following conditions: 1. A conditional use permit is approved to allow a scoreboard with no more than 950 square feet in area, no more than 50 feet in height, and a video display panel, in accordance with the application and plans received by the city on February 7, 2012, except as may be amended by this resolution. 2. The conditional use permit is approved with the finding that all applicable general and specific conditional use permit standards are met. 3. Prior to installation,the applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits. 4. The information displayed within the scoreboard shall be regulated by Section 21650 of the zoning ordinance. 5. The permit is subject to all applicable building and fire codes,and to all city regulations and ordinances. Any violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 6. Subsequent phases or expansions are subject to required reviews and approvals per ordinance provisions. Page 22 Res.2012- File 2012011 Page 2 7. This approval shall expire one year after the date of approval, unless the property owner or applicant has started the project, or unless the landowner or applicant has received prior approval from the city to extend the expiration date for up to one additional year, as regulated under section 21015.07 of the zoning ordinance. ADOP LED by the City Council on March 27,2012. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS. The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Plymouth, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Plymouth City Council on March 27, 2012 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof. WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this day of City Clerk Page 23 Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, April 27, 2016 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call Ill. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. 2016 04-13 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular V. Public Hearings A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment- Scoreboards at Kuhlman Stadium and Courtney Field B. Lot width variance for 5526 Interlachen Blvd. for Thomas and Shannon Leach VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead,the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments Xl. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 h meeting.hours in advance of te Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a dare. Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission 11 ea Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 13, 2016, 7:00 P.M. I. Call To Order Chair Platteter called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering the Roll were Chair Platteter, Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Kivimaki, Ma, Nemerov, Olsen, Carr, Hamilton Staff Present, Cary Teague,Joyce Repya,Jackie Hoogenakker III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the April 13, 2016, meeting agenda. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the March 23, 2016 meeting minutes. Motion seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Commissioner Nemerov offered a correction. The correction was accepted. All voted aye. The motion carried with the correction by Nemerov. V. Public Hearing A. Site Plan Review with Variances and Subdivision. 6600 York Avenue, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Noble Investments is proposing to develop the northeast corner of the Southdale site with a four-story, 146-room Hilton hotel. Teague explained to accommodate the request building setback variances from 49 to 14-24-feet on York Avenue and 48 to 21 to 46-feet from the new structure are required. Teague further noted that a parking stall setback from 20 to 7 feet would also be required along with a parking stall variance for the entire Southdale site. Teague also pointed out a subdivision to create the new lot the building would be located on was required. pg. 1 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:`a.. A here to enter a date. Teague noted that the project requires building setback variances, parking stall setback variance and parking stall variance. Teague also noted that the proposed landscaping exceeds code and the exterior building materials are proposed as stone, block metal, and stucco. Concluding, Teague told the Commission the request for a subdivision triggered the Parkland Dedication feel requirement, adding the applicant, if approved, would pay an $18,000 fee. Teague delivered a power point presentation on the proposed hotel development. Appearing for the Applicant Gary Tushie, Tushie— Montgomery&Associates, Inc. Applicant Presentation Mr. Tushie addressed the Commission and reported that Noble Investments/Hilton Hotels is proposing to construct a new 146-unit, four-story building in the northeast corner of the Southdale site. With graphics Tushie presented the project and noted the changes they made from the sketch plan as follows: • The building was moved 10-feet to the south and west to allow for more green space. • Landscaping was increased. (Especially on north and east sides of the building). • Added architectural features. • Added sidewalks/made connection from south parking lot to the NW corner of the site. • Reduced number of parking spaces from 147 to 12 Ito allow for more landscaping. • Added more storefront glass to the south facade to better match the entrance to the north. • Traffic on frontage road two way traffic instead of one way headed east only. • Elimination of storm water pond and the addition of underground storm water storage and treatment. A formal water feature is proposed to be added to the north entrance. Traffic Presentation Chuck Rickart, WSB, addressed the Commission and explained his findings/conclusions of the traffic study. Rickart said his findings concluded that no additional roadway improvements or additional parking would be required to accommodate the proposed Southdale Homewood Suites hotel. Rickart noted that the analysis included all proposed build outs and no build through 2040. Rickart recommended follow through on the following: • Complete the proposed Southdale Center ring road improvements of converting a section from one-way to two-way. • Complete the proposed sidewalk plan connecting the hotel to the internal Southdale Center facilities and adjacent City facilities. • Provide a 610 parking space variance from the Southdale Center site. • Continue study on the sidewalk/bike plan to ensure the sidewalk connects well into the system. It was further noted that the"ring road" does have bike lanes which helps circulation. pg. 2 V Draft Minutes El Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to eater a date. • Sections 2 & 3. Correct incorrect code references. • Sections 4. Sign Installation. This section increases the time allowed to construct a sign. • Sections 5 & 6. LED Lighting. LED lighting is not referenced in the current Code. The change simply adds LED lighting. • Sections 7. Corrects an error in the sign regulations table. Teague concluded his presentation. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. It was suggested that the Commission periodically review the Code for "clean up", etc. Motion Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to amend the Code as indicated. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Hobbs. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Community Comment John Crabtree, 5408 Oaklawn Avenue. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Add Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning Designation to the Wooddale Bridge Planner Presentation Planner Repya informed the Commission that on February 12, 2016, the Minnesota Historical Society announced that the historic Wooddale Bridge was added to the National Register of Historic Places. Repya commented that this was an honor and explained that in 2008 the bridge was added to the list of Edina properties eligible for local designation. Repya reported that the bridge has significance supporting local designation because the bridge was constructed in 1937 by the Works Progress Administration (WPA) that was part of a federal relief project. Repya added that with local designation a plan of treatment would be drafted for the bridge. Continuing Repay asked the Commission to note that at this time the bridge is in need of renovation and working with the Engineering Division an RFP was requested to replace the wing walls along the creek bed along with other corrections. pg. 5 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click her e to enter a date. Repya shared with Commissioners a video from "Agenda Edina" highlighting the history of the bridge and its significance. Repya concluded that she is seeking a recommendation from the Commission to the City Council designating the Wooddale Bridge for the Edina Heritage Landmark Overlay Zoning (EHL). Comments from the Commission Commissioners applauded locally designating the Wooddale Bridge as an Edina Heritage Landmark. It was also noted that the materials used on the bridge are difficult to maintain for many reasons; one being the use of salt on the bridge which is corrosive to the limestone. It was suggested that reducing the use of salt on the bridge and considering another approach could be of benefit; however, safety comes first. Repya agreed that the bridge is fragile and the designation along with a plan of treatment would be a positive step in maintaining the bridge in a historically safe manner. Motion Motion was made by Thorsen to recommend that the City Council add Edina Heritage Landmark (EHL) Overlay Zoning designation to the Wooddale Bridge. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Olsen. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Sketch Plan Review. 4528 & 4530 France Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Commission is being asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the properties at 4528 & 4530 France Avenue. Teague asked the Commission to note that the proposed sketch plan is generally similar with a sketch plan that was reviewed and generally well received in 2011; however, was not acted on. Continuing, Teague explained when the applicant returns with a formal application they would be requesting a rezoning with variances from PCD-I and PCD-4 (Planned Commercial District) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). With graphics Teague pointed out aspects of the project. He concluded that while the proposal would be an improvement over the existing building, adding the proposed uses are compatible with the area staff has concerns similar to the ones raised in 2011 as noted: I) Lack of screening to the neighborhood to the north; 2) A potential for parking shortage; 3) Buildings with parking in the front; 4) Drive-through on France Avenue and 5) Pedestrian safety. Appearing for the Applicant pg. 6 r Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Chck here to enter a date. Ed Farr, Edward Farr Architects Inc. Applicant Presentation Mr. Farr addressed the Commission and explained the applicant is proposing to redevelop this parcel with a new 5,730 square foot multi-tenant office building that would be built above the existing parking garage. Farr said at this time the project has firm tenants; Orion Developments and Gateway Bank are committed to the project. Farr gave a brief history of the "future" tenants, adding Gateway Bank is very committed to giving back to the community and is looking forward to locating in Edina. With graphics Farr pointed out the constraints of the site to include the topography and working with a small site with existing structures that include a large parking garage to the rear of the site and keeping the existing newer building. He pointed out the proposal would have the following: • The exterior building materials would match the materials found on the 4528 building, brick accents and stucco. • Rear and side of the new building features a walk-out roof top deck/green space above the existing parking garage. • The height of the new building would match the height of the 4528 building. • A small drive-up lane would be provided at the front of the site. Farr noted the drive-through is not heavily used and has a stacking ability of up to four vehicles. • Removal of the existing Rapid Oil building. • The project would provide 47 parking stalls. • Enhanced landscaping and sidewalk enhancement. Would consider a boulevard style sidewalk to include different materials such as stamped concrete; etc. Sidewalk is proposed to line up with the existing. • Curb cutes reduced from four to two. Chair Platteter explained that the sketch plan review process is not a public hearing it is an opportunity for an applicant to get feedback from the Commission and Council before they proceed with a formal application. Comments from the Commission • A question was raised if the bank would be the only tenant in the new building. Mr. Farr responded that the proposed building was multi-tenant, adding the bank would encompass roughly 3,000 square feet of the new building. It was acknowledged that the remaining space would be office use; possibly a medical use. • It was suggested that a boulevard style sidewalk (landscaping along street) was preferred. Consider planting vegetation that would work well along a busy street. • Support was expressed for the day time patio use. However, it was acknowledged that this would be a change for neighbors from the vacant Rapid Oil building. pg. 7 104 Draft Minutes Approved Minutes0 Approved Date:CHck here to enter a date, • An opinion was expressed that the proposed plan is not consistent with what the Commission • has been trying to accomplish. The Commission has pushed for new buildings to be built closer to the street with parking in the rear. This proposal is the exact opposite. • The elimination of two of the existing curb cuts was very positive. • More green space and less parking stalls should be considered. • Use the existing parking aisles as area for stacking space, rather than having a separate lane for the drive-through. • It was pointed out that the site is a very small already developed site; it's not a vacant piece of land. A hardship is the existing location of the large garage to the rear, existing newer building that will be retained and the topography of the site. • Opinions were expressed that the drive-through doesn't fit in this area. Commissioners expressed the opinion that different locations for the drive-through should be studied. It was suggested that the applicant consider relocating the drive-through away from the street and adding more green space closer to France Avenue. The additional greenspace should include a boulevard sidewalk that would buffer the site and create a more pleasant pedestrian experience. • It was further acknowledged that the site has limitations given the small size, existing building, the topography/grades and proximity to single-family homes; however, further parking lot design review and drive-through placement is needed. Parking could also become an issue depending on the type of tenant. • There was the suggestion of moving the proposed building closer to the street and locating the parking on top of the existing garage, noting the office building and patio/green area would be very visible to residents to the rear if developed as submitted. The Commission did comment that it is difficult to gage what the residential properties to the west would rather view; building and deck or parking deck with light standards and possible headlight wash. The discussion ensued with Commissioners again acknowledging that this is a difficult site to redevelop. The discussion continued on what's the best option for this site; building closer to street, parking in the rear or what's proposed. Commissioners also indicated that the proposal is better than what exists today; adding it's a hard call to know which scenario would work best. Property Owner Comments Ed Noonan introduced himself as property owner and explained the reason this project didn't proceed in 20 I I was because he was busy developing the Brownstones on France. Noonan stressed to the Commission how very challenging this site is. He said in a perfect world there would be no problem pulling everything up to the street; however, this site doesn't have that luxury. Continuing, Noonan said a lot of thought went into this plan. He further noted the residential properties to the west are comprised of very deep wooded lots and everything possible would be done to mitigate any impact. Concluding, Noonan said France Avenue in this location is a County road which presents its own issues. Further Comments Brian Maxwell, Gateway Bank informed the Commission he is a resident of Edina and is looking forward to locating the bank in this area. Maxwell said the bank would be very involved with the pg. 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Ciick here to enter a date. • community and the location is perfect being both close to commercial and residential. Maxwell asked the Commission for their support. Chair Platteter thanked the applicants for their presentation and comments. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Carr reported that the Greater Southdale Area Working Group continues to meet. The focus at this time is to meet in smaller groups as public outreach to businesses, developers and residents. Carr also noted the Group is planning another "check-in" with the City Council on May 17th. Commissioner Carr commented that in reviewing development plans it appears the applicant(s) always meet or exceed the City's landscaping Code requirements. Carr said if that is the case it may be time for the Commission to discuss if the Code needs to be stronger with regard to landscaping requirements. Chair Platteter commented that he tends to agree adding maybe the Commission should revisit the Code and also look at our parking lot requirements with regard to landscaping. Planner Teague agreed that the Commission should take another look at City requirements; especially as it relates to parking lots. Commissioner Lee told the Commission she reviewed the standards for minutes taking for the City; however, in her opinion she believes that summary minutes may not be best at the Commission level. X. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported (as previously mentioned) that on May 17th there will be a joint work session with the City Council and Greater Southdale Area Working Group. XI. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission at 10:10 P.M. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. Jackie' Nolwenalifivt Respectfully submitted pg. 9 • PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S 0 N D Work Session Work Session #of Mtgs. Attendance Meetings/Work Sessions _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 NAME TERM : (Enter Date) (Enter Date) Hobbs,Steve 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Olsen,Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Lee,Susan 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Carr, Claudia 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 57% Hamilton,John 3/1/2018 1 1 1 3 100% Thorsen,Todd 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Strauss, Gerard 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Nemerov, Ian 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Ma,Amy 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 86% Kivimaki, Peter 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 100% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers&attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held(ON MEETINGS'LINE) Attendance Recorded(ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type"1"under"Work Session"on the meetings' line. Type"1"under"Work Session"for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings'line. There is no number typed on the members' lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given,the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting. City of Edina, Minnesota- Intranet: City to Issue RFP for West 49 1/2 Street Page 1 of 2 T,- go VIeCITYof r EDINA ,,,,,,„„4,„ Tuesday, April 19, 2016 City to Issue RFP for West 49 1/2 Street By Scott Neal The City Council began its evening in a work session as the Housing & Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The HRA discussed purchasing a lot from the Edina Housing Foundation in the Wooddale and Valley View area; authorized City staff to prepare a Request For Proposal for redevelopment of the north side of West 49 1/2 Street in the 50th & France district; discussed the possibility of the City purchasing land for future affordable housing; and authorized City staff to work with Hennepin County staff on the redevelopment of the Southdale-Hennepin Area Library site. Following the work session, the Council met in work session to receive an update from staff and consultants on the proposal to build a new community center in the Grandview District. Following the work session, the City Council met in regular session and made the following decisions: • Agreed to the terms of a MnDOT Limited-Use Permit to allow the City to build a sidewalk on West 64th Street. 1 • Awarded a $24,128 contract to Braun Intertec for construction materials testing for the Golf Terrace B project. • Awarded a $43,000 contract to Semple Recycling & Crushing to crush and create new aggregate from old construction materials. • Awarded a $493,500 contract to Osseo Construction Company to paint the Southdale water tower. • Agreed to waive building and other City permit fees for building projects at Braemar Golf Course. • Received a special presentation from representatives of the Minnesota City Clerks and Finance Officers Association recognizing the many contributions to their professional association by Edina City Clerk Deb Mangen. Deb received the organization's Member of the Year Award at their annual conference earlier this spring. • Accepted a$31,445 gift from the Lewis family to build a new sun shelter and bench near the tennis courts adjacent to Creek Valley School. • Received the monthly Speak Up, Edina report from Jordan Gilgenbach concerning the City's practices and polices about accepting advertising in City publications and at City facilities. • Received a presentation from MnDOT Assistant District Engineer John Griffith about the upcoming detour routes planned for the one-year closure of U.S. Highway 169. • Accepted a report from the Transportation Commission that recommended reforms in the City's traffic safety request review process. • Approved the addition of a new sidewalk on Tower Street. • Approved an addition to the Energy& Environment Commission's 2016 work plan to study the advisability of a plastic bag ban in Edina. • Approved an addition to the Transportation Commission's 2016 work plan to study the feasibility of future passenger rail service to Edina. • Conducted a sketch plan review for a proposed redevelopment of 4528 and 4530 France Ave. httns://extranet.edinamn.Qov/index.nly?section=Council-meeting-summaries&prrid=407&... 4/20/2016 City of Edina, Minnesota - Intranet: City to Issue RFP for West 49 1/2 Street Page 2 of 2 • Authorized the Mayor and City Manager to execute a letter asking Edina's federally elected officials to support the FAA Accountability Act. Return to list. ©2016 City Of Edina, Minnesota 111-4r.o•/Inv+ranat Prlinamn Qnv/inrlex nhn?.section=Council-meeting-summaries&paid=407&... 4/20/2016 o ©� 40 80 Call 48 Hours before digging SITE PLANT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL i SCALE IN FEET Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 LEGEND MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 EXISTING • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES LOT LINE 1 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE w DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION ,o ' B -4 DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC �� o DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE / —0 DENOTES WOOD FENCE e DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE Q DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE Fli-jDENOTES FIRE HYDRANT 0 DENOTES SOIL BORING � –0— DENOTES SIGN/POST E— DENOTES GUY ANCHOR w (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCEs e (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE 10 73.98 PROPOSED Q DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE L. \ >>— DENOTES STORM SEWER #5524 I;• �� DENOTES DOWNSPOUT PROPOSED HOUSE �' DENOTES RETAINING WALL FFE=938.56 25? ` i DENOTES DRANAGE FLOW roe=s36.a8 0.. o TO BE REMOVED • BASEMENT=928.00 -i. �„ >� DENOTES TREE '' /, „ / � LEGAL DESCRIPTION v N yy ti LotM 7. 27 p 7,BRU 'S SUBDIVISION,Hennepin County, i' Nc1* B o. .25' i Minnesota,according to the recorded plat thereof.:. ��� �, �., ,e6 j BUILDING SETBACKS �t 259 a~ \; , P g ZONING: R1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT " ✓ �f 40 ` \\\___-;c:-.,°2 � _ HOUSE: FRONT=10.00 FT �'� r PR P SEDli I SDE= 10.00 FT �9 ��' REAR=25.00 FT h6 , b DRIVEWAY 86.15 X8.4. ... , I �.. � . . ''" EXISTING HARDCOVER 4� t I� V -'" F•ATIOE X89 �66� ;�oo . �� '' TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 0,00 SQ. FT. 2.44 r• 938.` 180 8. s I ' i �_.._. _ n 0 _ ) �� i.‹._. OWE - 4 °� TOTAL LOT AREA 67,601 SQ-FT.(1.55 AC. 'a PATIO A. .''W'.,.>) )1.<;.c r ' ' - ... '` EXISTING HARDCOVER 0.0% 3 927.5 •o .._F1 \� .. I ;:� I v ? ,�r € PROPOSED HARDCOVER n ,. lFT. 1_ = I PROPOSED HOUSE 4,023 68 SQ. L v iht' ;I i PROPOSED CONC.SURFACE 4,237.56 SQ.FT. az, , I i . _ ; TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 8,261 SQ. FT. h� �.� , E \,,-....- ' IA' \ l TOTAL LOT AREA 67,601 SQ.FT.(1.55 AC.) /25 I ,�•_ P 11 • PROPOSED HARDCOVER 12.22% ,,<, L. NOTES I, "' 10 ti }�., , 1.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 5528 I 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED rrJ, r"' # ', 1 3.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS �`' f' � `'+ ----- 1 SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. ' •• �� — 89.78 ------- - 1 '. 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER L `% LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY \ �^ 10 -_ . OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY a `..... . a a: D -. ° J RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE __ ......_.� PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES E 4' OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES ' SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS BY , 11 6I CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL V RIFY PROPOSFD VATIONS. •: ',it. ENGINEERING DESIGN Sc SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, JOB NAME: TOM LEACH _y, _ AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: EP PROJECT NO.: 15-108 : '.' 6430 WayzataBlvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 Ai 2d(763) 545-2800 FAX (763) 545-2801 'XRC Jz+'x..4.,eA. DATED: 3/28/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO.25105 EDINA, MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS 13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 1 OF 5 0 6, 40 80 Call 48 Hours before digging S ITE PLAN GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND EXISTING MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE Proposed Replacement Trees DENOTES LOT LINE 1 Denotes Coniferous Tree DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION o I B 0 Denotes Deciduous Tree — DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW / � DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE �� —OE DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC �� O DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE ID DENOTES WOOD FENCE • d5 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE 0s DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE i DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT , /x t'i DENOTES SOIL BORING - DENOTES SIGN/POST n 1 DENOTES GUY ANCHOR (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE W .<, R �s s — ( L.- ~ (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE l t o x.3:98 . PROPOSED \, CI 4 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE i » DENOTES STORM SEWER f ❑ IIQ #5524 I DENOTES DOWNSPOUT -y/` `" ' PROPOSED HOUSE \ '`= DENOTES RETAINING WALL FFE=938.56 gti' ,. I , DENOTES DRANAGE FLOW >. TOB=936.48 0 c'. I "5 TO BE REMOVED '- BASEMENT=928.00 A, 0� yci, DENOTES TREE mr / _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Z I; Lot 7,BRUM'S SUBDIVISION,Hennepin County, .k �8 ��:_.- . .-, w. o� `25 .'•. • - A �' T Minnesota,accordingto the recorded plat thereof. T Ht z BUILDING SETBACKS 26 >'' a /„ ji ZONING: RI =SINGLE DWELLING UNIT 9 Nl f s / A0 f \ 1 j >.E s� HOUSE: FRONT=10.00 FT 6 a PRO::0:s1:i4k.Ds. "....1 . SIDE=10.00 FT DRIVEWAY,. c REAR 25.00 FT 18' �'� •,.; I .. r'.'.. F RE 6� SAO hx '^'—.. � <�. 'A� w , -Ano w .6 9 �6. �o°_ ,,, `h (� . ( TOTAL IM 0.00 SQ. FT. . . . AREA 938.` 180 ES _n, S EXISTING HARDCOVER "�, _.•..._... __ owE au c�I`! I{ ;` TOTAL LOT AREA U 67,601 SQ.FT.(1.55 AC.) f., ,/ .," PATIO 0 •;fig is Gl4� l 0% A. "'777 - � 9z7s .c I � W� ,� ''-7-- - ..._..__ _ oma' EXISTING HARDCOVER 0. o ' ,,,.4 PROPOSED HARDCOVER >., A9.4.:::: 68 SQ. FT. Y x:16.2PROPOSED / \ ili� I - \ PROPOSED CONCESURFACE 4,0237.56 SQ. FT. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA 8,261 SQ. FT. /' ✓ /` .~ SQ.FT.(1.55 ^rPY - ��-" A TOTAL LOT AREA 67,601 AC.) 25/ / ./ tt�` \ ' i F NOTES HARDCOVER 12.22% / 1.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. #5528.. 3.NO TITLE IINFORMATION WAS PIROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS a _ ( \�+ I I ' SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. <. "F--- -- I 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER , , I 89.78 ----- L - - LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY k �"e° 10 S''` I _. _ i OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY • ❑ ` , _�... ... ,/ # a —o `p -`- o. :. a-- 3 E RESIDENT OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE T 1 A ..m,,_') *` , PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES L n ! I; 6 6 SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY ? • GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO is ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. 5 CONTRACTOR SHAT I VE IFY PROPOSED E VATIONS. ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, JOB NAME: TOM LEACH _ _ AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: EP PROJECT NO.: 15-108 6480 Wayzata E/. Mbr apolis, MN 55426 7 p OFFICE. (7631 545 2800 FAX (763) 545.2801 4�Cf z, Ott eft DATED: 3/25/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL: inFo0edsmn.com WEBSITE, http.//edsmn.com VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 EDINA, MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS 13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 1 OF 5 Call 48 Hours before digging GRADING DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLANT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 0 40 80 r® Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 LEGEND SCALE IN 'FEET EXISTING • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON IIIi — DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE o � I '8 DENOTES LOT LINE _ / 7 'DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE 7 x -'•',*.., DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION � -4-- DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW 1 `--a, DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC —0— DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE —0 DENOTES WOOD FENCE 0 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE O S DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE =8 8 DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT -',5- B . ," , 4� O DENOTES SOIL BORING 4 � DENOTES SIGN/POST : °� o TYPICAL SILT FFNC ® -\ •,\� 73.98" DENOTES GUY ANCHOR , %yfi► �, Q (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE 00 #5524 I i PROPOSED SED HOUSE DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE TYPICAL IL , m fi FFE=938.56 ,-,52' ,- I \\ \ rQ DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE ( rq-n' q p w- ill �. '" j„ C •`�' T08=936.48 p c`. V"),' . �ecx, BASEMENT=szB.00 � : �, � :. � ® DENOTES PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT c. p <t R NI<1:>K �C 1 ^ lxxx.xl DENOTES PROPOSED GRADE -'0F tosp,h0A, • tib v' s ;I - '' DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED 1 r� /401:,v0.-`,-k R 6- 's � o. ,z5. - 1 i v ,� �. ROCK F NIRA 'CO,' _, :;.�,V4a a.,4w , a6 .� I 11 s \I�` ,I ® � � DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS sg� �`. • •j•,,,',- �c9 .'1x''1' �`� m. ;,, ;° _ 1•. I �� _ _ j 4 'i � DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ��►�� �, -...11$ �� 59 �r� 1 • `•' j (':: fl0.1°� DENOTES ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 6.L L , , ,6 k a PROPOS (.: �� I�wrA i=rk e�iriVr►fl�` , W 46 nn.� r a. •'.7i•c tI' {}Q� DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE rX11U �9: DRIVEWAY 0� ` i ® kS y L__ �`\ 6 _ ,�y.l ;'\ , 4 ' - .4.•' _ . F'M �a. rr, —r a� •o- _.- DENOTES UNDERGROUND STORM �e. .t zlr. �I - +� . � �1. V RE AO., �. ,3F �8 �. X66 s o � I •� - '',<•,'''':'-',7,;„.„'..'',:i.':-� �` �'� ��• ���® ���� �, DENOTES RETAINING WALL ATIO tp 69 0 E ' 1 '• to*fu titre,, 938.E �� _ ®�®� �, '0 /' �' �Nf� Ti 932,0,.P W o "Q �Oiv Td' tc1>< BW 928.0 sz�6 11R i .� - - ; ,1, ✓' '' s. 4k11 92 . c 1 QQ "' NOTES 1Q PROVIDE SILT:::::::RIMETER OF SITE TYPICALSILT FFNCE ---X6� i C, •:4 I 9c°` `� `.. \ ` /' 3Q ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE •cx� ,,,,. � " < Ir � � `�� � NOTES '� y \ -' 1.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 25 >,A1.4 + '-',..,„",\‘‘..; \ 1 NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED owL'o , 3 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. " 1 4.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS I' 9 \ #5528. \.,, SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. ,T-" r 924 'I; , \ `\\ . ti� -n , ,- 5.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER I " 4Y� ,- --\--- \\.„...,..\1-....------- 89.78-------- l LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY L'- - - - - - - i OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY ®C 10 j RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE _ a p =''=o a-. v .. . —1 PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES �. ? h( l; SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY / TYPICAL SILT FENCE[�7........ ( CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO 5 6 ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. is ENGINEERING LJESIGN Sc SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. e,W,E„_ w„w,,,,„,,, .vEYI AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME: TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426J r J OFFICE: 1763) 545-2800 FAX: (7631 545-2801 'lead ,,,,zi e,y- 3/28/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 2 OF 5 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S.NO. 25105 EDINA, MN 55436 GRADING NOTES 1111) E 1TJ\_I LS 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO STD RTROF SITE GRADING.THE NCONTRAC CONTRACTOR SHALL IIMMED IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THEOPROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 2.SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOIL ENCOUNTERED ON THE SITE WITH EXCEPTION OF TOPSOIL DEBRIS.ORGANIC MATERIAL AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIAL.STOCKPILE TOPSOIL AND GRANULAR NOTES: FILL AT LOCATIONS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. - PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6" (153 mm) DEEP 3.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO TRENCH AND BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY. EXISTING PAVEMENT,THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF THE - POSTS SHALL BE: EXISTING PAVEMENT. - 4! (1.22 m) ON CENTER 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. - 2" (50.8 mm) X 2" (50.8 mm) HARDWOOD, PINE OR 5.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES,CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION. STEEL FENCE POSTS. MINIMUM LENGTH 4.5' 6.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL,BITUMINOUS SURFACING,CONCRETE ITEMS,ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS,AND OTHER - DRIVEN 2 (0.61 m INTO THE GROUND. UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OFF THE HARD SURFACE PUBLIC ROAD • ) CONSTRUCTION SITE. 2 • 8.COMPLETION OF SITE GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL RESULT IN ALL AREAS BEING GRADED TO'PLAN SUBGRADE (0.76 m) FABRICELEVATION'.THE PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY AREAS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY REFERRING TO THE SITE PLAN AND PAVEMENT SECTION DETAILS FOR LOCATION AND LIMITS OF BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONS. s" FABRIC 9.THE MINIMUM GRADED SLOPE FROM EDGE OF BUILDING SHALL BE 6 INCHES IN 10 FEET. �� SO tilllVlM I' 10.FINISHED GROUND AND SOD ELEVATION ADJACENT TO BUILDING SHALL BE 6"BELOW FLOOR ELEVATION.SLOPE Q` 0,i4 ®I�F GROUND AWAY FROM BUILDING A MINIMUM OF 6"IN 10 FEET BEYOND 10 FEET REFER TO PLAN GRADES. 1p 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GRADING AND SLOPING THE FINISHED GROUND SURFACE TO PROVIDE ' ` 6" 153 mm) SMOOTH&UNIFORM SLOPES.WHICH PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS AND PREVENT PONDING IN LOWER AREAS.CONTACT ENGINEER IF FIELD ADJUSTMENTS TO GRADING PLANS ARE REQUIRED. a 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ONLY THOSE TREES MARKED IN THE FIELD VERIFY WITH ENGINEER PRIOR TO REMOVAL. ,.. 13.ALL GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2105. 1"-2" WASHED ROCK '/ 14.EXISTING CURB CUTS SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STANDARD DETAILS (AND SPECIFICATIONS) . 6" MINIMUM EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1 TYPICAL ROCK ENTRANCETYPICAL SILT 1.CONTRACTOR MUST CALL FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING 48HRS PRIOR TO ANY LAND DISTURBANCES. NOT TO SCALE 2 FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN FINES,THE REVOCATION OF PERMIT AND A STOP WORK ORDER BEING C2 FENCE CONSTRUCTION ISSUED. C2 NOT TO SCALE 2.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANDY LAND DISTURBANCE OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 3.BEFORE BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION,INSTALL A TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT EACH POINT EROSION CONTROL NOTES WERE VEHICLES EXIT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.USE 2 INCH OR GREATER DIAMETER ROCK IN A LAYER AT LEAST 1.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA,INCLUDING TEMPORARY STOCKPILES, 6 INCHES THICK ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF THE ENTRANCE.EXTEND THE ROCK ENTRANCE AT LEAST 50 MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER FEET INTO THE CONSTRUCTION ZONE USING A GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC BENEATH THE AGGREGATE TO PREVENT THAN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF MIGRATION OF SOIL INTO THE ROCK FROM BELOW. THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.STABILIZE 4.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS TRACKED OR OTHERWISE DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PAVEMENT GRADING. TURF ESTABLISHMENT & AREAS.REMOVAL SHALL BE ON A DAILY BASIS WHEN TRACKING OCCURS AND MAY BE ORDERED BY MINNEAPOLIS WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND STRAW MULCH APPLIED AT 2 TONS PER EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS INSPECTORS AT ANY TIME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT.SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE ACRES. DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND DONE IN A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT 2.SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON TURF ESTABLISHMENT PROPERTIES. THE PLAN AND AROUND ANY STOCKPILES.SILT FENCE SHALL BE ALL TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2575 AND 5.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CATCH BASIN INLETS,WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE INSPECTED AND MAINTINED WEEKLY(AND WITHIN 24 HRS OF A 0.5" SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE COMPLETED GRADING DISTURBED AREAS.CATCH BASIN INSERTS OR OTHER APPROVED PRODUCT ARE REQUIRED IN UNDISTURBED RAINFALL)UNTIL FINAL SEEDING AND MULCHING(OR SODDING)OF OPERATION. AREAS THAT MAY RECEIVE RUN OFF FROM THE PROJECT AREA.HAY BALES OR FILTER FABRIC WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT ALLOWED FOR INLET PROTECTION. LOT. TOPSOIL 6.LOCATE SOIL OR DIRT STOCKPILES NO LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY OR DRAINAGE 3.ALL FABRIC FENCES USED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTRACTOR SHALL STRIP,STOCKPILE AND RE-SPREAD SUFFICIENT CHANNEL.IF REMAINING FOR MORE THAN SEVEN DAYS,STABILIZE THE STOCKPILES BY MULCHING,VEGETATIVE THE DISTRICT HAS TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM 4 INCH DEPTH(COMPACTED)TO ALL COVER,TARPS,OR OTHER MEANS.CONTROL EROSION FROM ALL STOCKPILES BY PLACING SILT BARRIERS CONTROL SHALL NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL DETERMINED THAT THE SITE HA SBEEN PERMANENTLY RE-STABILIZED DISTURBED AREAS,TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED. AROUND THE PILES.TEMPORARY STOCKPILES LOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE NO LESS THAN TWO AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 30 DAYS THEREAFTER. SOD FEET FROM THE DRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED IF LEFT MORE THAN 24HRS. 4.DUST CONTROL IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER.THE SOD SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 3878. 7.MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING PERMIT HOLDER MUST ELIMINATE DUST PROBLEMS UPON RECEIVING SEEDING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED.INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON A DAILYBASIS IS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED DAMAGED OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IMMEDIATELY. S SEEDING RE. NOTICE FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THAT THERE IS A DUST SEED MIX SHALL BE MnDOT 50B AT 100#PER ACRE.DORMANT8.TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS WHICH HAVE UNDERGONE FINAL GRADING, PROBLEM. AFTER NOVEMBER 1,AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE. AND ALL AREAS IN WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY 5.STREET CLEANING SHALL OCCUR DAILY OR AS NEEDED. MULCHING UNDERWAY AGAINST EROSION DUE TO RAIN,WIND AND RUNNING WATER WITHIN 7-14 DAYS.USE SEED AND 6.BUILDER TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MULCH SHALL BE MnDOT TYPE 1.STRAW SHOULD BE SPREAD MULCH,EROSION CONTROL MATTING,AND/OR SODDING AND STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS.AN EARLY PRECAUTIONS DESCRIBED UNDER EDINA CITY CODE CHAPTER 10, UNIFORMLY ATA RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE AND ANCHORED WITH APPLICATION OF GRAVEL BASE ON AREAS TO BE PAVED RECOMMENDED MINIMIZING EROSION POTENTIAL. ARTICLE 7-LITTERING IN THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK. EITHER NETTING OR A STRAIGHT DISC. 9.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC,STRUCTURAL,NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL 7.TOM LEACH IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE FERTILIZER DEVICES AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION WITH PERMANENT VEGETATION AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. TYPE 20-0-10 AT 400#PER ACRE. ESTABLISHMENT.FINAL STABILIZATION FOR PURPOSED OF THIS REMOVAL IS 70%ESTABLISHED COVER OVER DENUDED AREA. 8.SITE ACCESS SHALL BE VIA A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.TO GRADING 10.READY MIXED CONCRETE AND CONCRETE BATCH PLANTS ARE PROHIBITED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.ALL THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE,HEAVY ALL GRADING SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT 2105. CONCRETE RELATED PRODUCTION,CLEANING AND MIXING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE IN THE DESIGNATED EQUIPMENT AND TRUCKS SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING CONCRETE MIXING/WASHOUT LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN.UNDER NO OUTSIDE OF THE GRAVEL PAD AT SITE ACCESS. CIRCUMSTANCE MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTO ANY PUBLIC OR 9. IN THE CASE OF PUMPED DISCHARGE,CONTRACTOR MUST FILTER PRIVATE STORM DRAIN CONVEYANCE. ANY TURBID WATER THROUGH SAND AND SILT FENCE BEFORE 11.CHANGES TO APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR DISCHARGING TO STREET. INLET PROTECTION MUST BE IN PLACE. PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSTALLATION AND DETAILS FOR ALL PROPOSED ALTERNATE TYPE DEVICES. 10.TEMPORARY STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT 12.PREVENT COMPACTION OF AREAS PROPOSED TO BE LANDSCAPED AS GREEN SPACE. CONTROLS IN PLACE TO PREVENT DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. , ENGINEERING DESIGN D SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, ` ..,,,,. AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME: TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 C%` 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 rr ,� Ilea' JF<OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX (763) 545.2801 ay"1='I '. 6/25/18 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 3 OF 3 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L S. NO. 25105 EDINA, MN 55436 GENERAL NOTES STORM W o ao eo Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1. SEE SWMP NOTES ON SHEET C5 FOR FURTHER SWMP ® REQUIREMENTS,IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS PLAN AND SCALE IN FEET Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 SWMP NOTES,THE SWMP NOTES SHALL OVERRULE. 1 J A l 1 J PLAN gyp✓ MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE INITIAL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL AREAS ALTERED HAVE BEEN RESTORED. 3. ALL REAR YARD AREAS OF LOTS AT SETBACK LINE ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF GRADING BY GRADING1 CONTRACTOR. ALL AREAS BETWEEN THE CURB AND SETBACK LINE NUMBERED NOTES ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF PRIVATE f UTILITY INSTALLATION BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR. O1 INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING 'o 771 8 ACTIVITIES. 4. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE UNDERTAKEN ON AN AS-NEEDED / ' BASIS. ,(� 2�INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \ PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 5. PERFORM SEEDING FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREA / \_- I AS FOLLOWS: 3 NSTALL SWMP BOX NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. a. REPLACE TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS. LOOSEN INSTALL TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT PAD. TOPSOIL TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3". b.APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER PER <>TREE PROTECTION DEVICE 1,000 SQUARE FEET. R } c.INCORPORATE FERTILIZER INTO SOIL BY USE OF HARROW OR W • OTHER MEANS TO PLACE FERTILIZER BELOW GROUND LEVEL. ,'s B ,' RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER d.APPLY Mn/DOT SEED MIXTURE 190 AT ''''.:A 0 73.98 -- O ACRE WITH BRILLION TYPE SEEDER OR OTHER MEANS TO � �� / y I S COVER SEED WITH 3'TO 4"OF SOIL. /\ Y �� I ' ✓ • I . e.APPLY UNIFORM COVERING OF Mn/DOT TYPE 1 MULCH ATA ;. r �3 I" #5524 ,. RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. !.'!o �a 3` OSED HOUSE \ I d \ H ` ' N to,0, FFE=938.56 ,Lg.`1- f. ANCHOR MULCH TO DEPTH OF 2"TO 3"WITH DISC ANCHOR OR TOB=936.48 �. OTHER MEANS IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING. _ ' -7 BASEMENT=928.00 . o I '.'•If �, f all r� • EXISTING ✓` • .,y�SP�44 Nq,� �61 II ; ro op ti II \ \ ; a • DENOTES FOUND PR OPERTY IRON _ �` `` �'fr `� r �� II 3 DENOTES • ,:. ` i 11, •; .._..DENOTES EXISTING 1 i'It 51 �; A° � = I� ------ - N - �� EXISTING ELEVATION w .f` 46 i PROPOSED ` ® — — i�:� '�, ei,�7�;,�!B.t�r J�,� �. .,... DENOTEScar . w 1' ,19 � -4— DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW " I L*, • A o, rn Ew r 1: ,® " DRIV AY $ .. ..� x , •t! � �n411�1a`:a. „..„ ...to 0, .. I qQ, DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE -"4A- RE \yen �` ` :�' `t I -` ,i .G ., �.�! li-1 g 938.E < g 65 s. 7.. rF �• •• *Al Cow&. 1, 1 —OE DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC Ano o • ,0 'moi + ,& ' J .�� ` ' OWE• A') . !Lela —0 DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE el', ,,� f 1�Yll1 fW 932 0`, PATIO h a A `! ��G 4.. .-, E1W•928. 927.5 �'. ti —0 DENOTES WOOD FENCE i � _ �` �1 �.. F, }, 4D Pa.929.Q 3`/ • DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE ^ a 1 � �� v vt ew 2•.Q .�6 2 O OS DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE - 1.,14LIa It*;lc, :r� , 4 DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT >�� y u i \ \ 0 DENOTES SOIL BORING �xD �� III!..1,;‘,.' �� �� V_...` ti,V —0— DENOTES SIGN/POST (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE /R 44 I E— DENOTES GUY ANCHOR (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE 25 + s�� \\ �... \ PROPOSEDE 10 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE ( DENOTES PROPOSED I . , -,�� o #5528 I O DRAINAGE FLOW 8x 78 DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE WM DENOTES ROCK I 924 ' I�fi��l (923) - .�\ ---- ----� CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I - I �= DENOTES PROPOSED DOWNSPOUT __J , • , � xx.x DENOTES PROPOSED GRADE ❑❑❑ DENOTES PROPOSED L_ . (x I SILT FENCE * .. / . , : -. , e. _ a ❑ .'m9., _::_;::a - off=o J _. _.__ ..........—i-.-� DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED \ 10 _� X ENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS ` I • > DENOTES UNDERGROUND STORM DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES RETAINING WALL I' Ii ' ENGINEERING DESIGN 8c SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, _ AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME: TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 R 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 l ' OFFICE: 17631 545-2800 FAX: 17631 545.2801 FTOQ J"dd'Ccv e-c. 3/29/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL: info@edsmn-com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com EDINA. MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 4 OF 5 Call 48 Hours before digging Storm Water Management Plan Description of the type and locations of BMP's appropriate for this site and sufficient to 4.Sediment Control Practices The work described to implement the following Storm Water Management Plan(SWMP) comply with all applicable requirements of the TMDL implementation plan and GOPHER STATE ONE CALL shall be considered part of the Contract Documents and shall be performed by the identification of the receiving water and of the areas of project site discharging to an Description of sediment control practices to be used to minimize sediments from Contractor.The work to install and maintain the Best Management Practices(BMP's)to impaired water that has an approved TMDL implementation plan that contains entering surface waters,including curb and gutter systems and storm drain inlets: prevent erosion and provide sediment control shall be in accordance with Permit No.MN requirements for construction Stormwater discharges: R10000f and shall include,but are not necessarily be limited to,the requirementsTwin Cities Area 651-454-0002 Permanent sediment control practices to be used on this project consist of contained herein. Not applicable to this project. sedimentation basins.Temporary sediment control practices to be used are silt fence, culvert inlet protection,storm sewer inlet protection,stone pad exits,ditch checks,and, M N. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 1.Construction Activity Information Selection of Permanent Stormwater Management System if necessary,street sweeping. Project Name:RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE DESIGN Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal to one 5.Dewatering and Basin Draining Project Address/Location:Township-Section-Range=117-29-21 acre? Yes XX No City/Township:City of EDINA State:MN Zip Code:55436 — If the project includes dewatering or basin draining,describe the 8MP's to be used to 9.Pollution Prevention Management Measures County Parcel ID Number(s): 29-117-21-14-0009 If yes,a water quality volume of 1/2 inch of runoff from this area must be treated before prevent the discharge from adversely affecting the receiving waters and downstream All cities where construction will occur.City of EDINAleaving the site or entering surface waters(1 inch of runoff from this area if discharging landowners. Contractor shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on All townships where construction will occur:Not Applicablethe site: to special waters). All counties where construction will occur:HENNEPIN County N/A •Solid Waste:Collect and properly dispose of sediment,asphalt and concrete millings. Project Size(number of acres to be disturbed):0.98 Method(s)to be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the floating debris,paper,plastic,fabrics,construction and demolition debris,and other Project Type: x Residential _Commercial/Industrialproject 6.Additional BMP's for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands wastes in accordance with MPCA disposal requirements. _Road Construction _Other(describe) Wet sedimentation basin _Infiltration/Filtration basin This project does not discharge stormwater directly to a Special Water.This project •Hazardous Materials:Properly store,provide required secondary containment,and Cumulative Impervious Surface: XX Regional ponds _Combination of practices does not discharge stormwater directly to wetlands,exept roof drain 6"PVC. dispose of oil products,fuels,fuels,point products,and other hazardous Existing area of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre:0.0 substances to prevent spills,leaks,and other discharges in accordance with Post construction area of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre:0.19 Description of treatment method(s)to be used,including desgn information for each 7.ConsVuction Activity Sequence MPCA regulations.Provide restricted access storage areas to prevent unauthorized Receiving Waters: method: access and vandalism. In addition to performing and sequencing the tasks associated with implementing this •Equipment Washing:Restrict external washing of trucks and other construction Name of Water Body Type Appendix A Special Water? Existing pond will be used to collect water Promo the roof. SWMP as described herein and shown on the plan,the Contractor shall perform equipment to a defined area of site.Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. - POND Noconstruction activities in accordance with the following sequence. Engine degreasing is prohibited on the property. Description of why it is not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for water quality 'Spill prevention:Park construction equipment and store potentially hazardous Dates of Constructionmaterials in a designated area volume.This can include proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of (1)Install silt fence along property line of project see where shown on plan and when located as far as practicable from potential right-of-way precludes the installation of any permanent stormwater management property line is down gradient and within 100 feet of areas to have disturbed soil and environmentally sensitive areas.Construct impoundment dike and take other measures Estimated Construction Start Date:MAY,2016required to contain spilled material.Remove and dispose of contaminated soil, practices.Description of what other treatment,such as grassed swales,smaller ponds, where property line is within 20 feel of soil disturbing and other construction activities. Estimated Completion Date:DECEMBER,2016 vegetation,and other materials and perform other mitigation measures as required in P or grit chambers,will be implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters: (2)Install silt fence along edge of wetlands and at other locations shown on the plan. accordance with MPCA regulations. (3)Install stone exit pads where shown on plan and at other locations where vehicles *Sanitary and Septic Waste:Provide and maintain temporary facilities in accordance Contact Information Not Applicable and equipment will leave the site onto paved and gravel surfaces. with MPCA and Minnesota Department of Health regulations. (4)Construct storm water ponds and related piping and control structures as shown on Owner of Project Site:TOM LEACH Description of how a proposed alternative method to treat runoff from new impervious the project plans.Install and maintain temporary erosion prevention measures as shown Business/Firm Name:NIA10.Final Stabilization surfaces will achieve approximately 80%removal of total suspended solids on an annual on the plan. Federal Tax ID Number:available as needed average basis: (5)Install silt fence along bottom of storm water pond inslopes and where shown on the State-Tan ID Number:evadable as needed Contractor shall achieve final stabilization of the construction site by achieving the plan. following: Contact Person:TOM LEACH Not Applicable (6)Install trunk sanitary sewer. Title:OWNER OF PROJECT SITE (7)Complete earthwork activities.Install and maintain sediment control measures such •Soil disturbing activities have been completed and soils are stabilized by a uniform Phone:612-336-0665 3. • Erosion Prevention Practices as ditch checks and stormwater inlet protection. MailingAddress:3200 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH STREET City:MINNEAPOLIS perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent over the entire pervious surface (8)Complete utility construction.Install and maintain sediment control measures such area or other equivalent means to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. State:MN Zip Code:55402-2215 Description of construction phasing,vegetative buffer strips,horizontal slope grading, as inlet protection as work proceeds. and other construction practices to be used to minimize erosion: (9)Remove silt deposits from site,remove silt deposits from stormwater basins. •Temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's are Contractor(Party who will oversee implementation of the SWMP.May be same party asremoved. (10)Provide soil stabilization to disturbed areas by preparing topsoil,seeding,fertilizing, Owner above): Stage the soil disturbing activities to minimize the amount of disturbed soil prior to mulching,anchoring mulch in accordance with plans and specifications. •Sediment is removed from permanent sedimentation basins to return basins to the desstabilization.Disturbed areas will be considered stabilized when covered with materials (11)Remove perimeter silt fence,other silt fence,check dams,and other sediment remov capacity,removed from stormwater conveyance systems,and is stabilized or Business/Firm Name: TOM LEACH such as anchored mulch,slaked sod,riprap,wood fiber blanket,or other materials that control measures upon achieving final stabilization and Owner submits the Notice of removed from the site. Federal Tax 10 Number-available as needed prevent erosion from occurring.Grass seeding alone will not be considered stabilization. Termination. State Tax ID Number-available as needed 11.Notice of Termination Contact Person:TOM LEACH Title:OWNER OF PROJECT SITE Disturb only those areas where proposed contours and elevations am shown to differ 8.Inspections and Maintenance Phone:612-336-4665 from the existing and where removals and other operations am noted.Special areas of Contractor shall notify Owner Immediately upon achieving Final Stabilization.Owner Mailing Address:3200 IDS CENTER 80 S 8TH STREET City:MINNEAPOLIS the project site that are not to be disturbed by construction activity are noted on the plan. Description of procedures to be taken to routinely inspect the construction site: must submit the Notice of Termination within 30 days after Final Stabilization or within State:MN Zip Code:55402-2215 30 days of another owner assuming control according to Part 11.8,5.over all areas of the Description of temporary erosion protection or permanent cover to be used for exposed Contractor shall inspect erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to ensure site that have not undergone Final Stabilization. General Construction Project Information positive slopes within 200 lineal feet of a surface water(stream,lake,pond,marsh, integrity and effectiveness.Repair,replace,or supplement non-functional BMP's to wetland,reservoir spring,river,storm water basin,storm water drainage system, provide continually functional BMP's.Contractor shall inspect the entire construction site Description of the construction activity(what will be built,general time/ins.,etc.). waterways,water courses,and irrigation systems whether surface water is natural or a minimum of once every seven(7)days during active construction and within 24 hours artificial,public or private with maximum time an exposed soil area can remain exposed after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours.Inspections shall include SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION.The construction activities will include when the area is not actively being worked: stabilized areas,erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's,and infiltration areas. grading operations for the construction of surface drainage and utilities.Roof drain Specific tasks associated with the inspection and maintenance of the BMP's include the sewer construction,exposed soil stabilization,and bituminous paving will follow grading Provide year round stabilization to the above mentioned areas in accordance with the following: operations. following table: •Maintain and retain at the construction site written records of the inspections and Maximum Exposure Duration When Area maintenance performed.Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall 2.General Site Information Steepness of slope(H:V) Is Not Actively Worked include:Date and time of inspection/maintenance activity;Name of person(s)Performing the activity;Finding of inspection;Recommended corrective actions;Corrective actions Description of the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention Greater than 3:1 7 Days taken;and Date and amount of rainfall events greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. and sediment control BMP's to be used,including the timing for installation and 3:1 through 10:1 14 Days •Repair,replace,or supplement silt fences that become nonfunctional or accumulate procedures used to establish additional temporary BMP's as necessary. Less than 10:1 21 Days sediment to the level of 1/3 the silt fence height or more within 24 hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. Contractor shall install and maintain the temporary and permanent erosion prevention Description of practices to be used to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of drainage •Drain temporary and permanent sediment basins and remove sediment when the and sediment control BMP's as shown on the accompanying drawing and as described or diversion ditches within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to a volume of sediment colected reaches 1/2 the permanent storage volume within 72 heroin.The timing shall be in accordance with the Construction Activity Sequence below surface water within 24 hours of connecting the ditch to the surface water: hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. and in accordance with sound and proactive construction scheduling and practices. •Inspect surface waters,drainage ditches,and stormwater conveyance systems for Install seed,fertilizer,and disc-anchored mulch or temporary wood fiber blanket In evidence of sediment deposited by erosion.Remove deltas and deposited sediment and Accompanying this SWMP is a site plan that includes the following features: ditches and swales within 24 hours of connecting the ditch or swale to the surface water restabilize areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil within seven(7)days where shown on the plan in accordance with the details. of discovery unless precluded by legal,regulatory,or physical constraints.Removal and •Existing and proposed grades,including dividing fines and direction of flow for all pre- stabilization shall be completed within seven(7)days of obtaining access.The and post-construction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. Description of other erosion prevention practices to be used: NPDES/SDS permit holder is responsible for contacting the local,regional,state,and Locations of impervious surfaces and soil types. federal authorities and receiving the applicable permits prior to performing this work. •Locations of areas not to be disturbed. Install the specified energy dissipation method,such as riprap and geotextile fabric,at •Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations for evidence of sediment being tracked •Method(s)to be used for final stabilization of al exposed soil areas. pipe outlets within 24 hours of installation.Permanently seed disturbed areas prior to off-site onto paved surfaces.Remove tracked sediment from off-site paved surfaces end of seeding dates specified by MnDOT. within 24 hours of discovery. Description of stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an •Inspect perimeter of construction site.Remove off-site accumulations of sediment in a environmental,archaeological,or other required local,state,or federal review of the I manner and at a frequency to minimize off-site impacts. project: Not applicable to this project. ENGINEERING DESIGN SURVEYING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, EJS6480 r hAND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME: TOM LEACH FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 15-108 Wayzata Blvd. Mieapolis, MN 55426 / I , D OFFICE; 1763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 ,Qct Jz✓Yzad e. c 3/28/2016 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com EDINA, MN 55436 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 5 OF 5 .,z, CERTIFICATE OSURVEY Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL �'" ' ' MTwinN. Toll CitiesFree Area1-800-252-1166 651-454-0002 w 1 ,:i4 ‘,.-, 2 cD-5j NO *44 0 6 6 wsii40 ao ��, NO0'38'14" 175.00(P) SCALE IN FEET J \` COMPUTEDNEPOSITION OF GREEN LU 12 VW'�� ,SOF I p CORNER FALLS IN POND ,q� Pe Amy,— POND � -0., ' '; _ ;: i2� e/__ / LEGEND WA11 R LEVEL = 913.927444**,--.0� 0ii i`t2��92�./, •• DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON AS MEASURED ON 8/14/15 .74$0-.e. i..-....,c)._- • w 4,?��•i��`jDENOTES BOUNDARY LINE / /���� ^' ���X�% 9/��93 — _ _ — DENOTES LOT LINE .04:/ ♦3i.�.;, / / / �' In ,-- 999 —DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE ,�y�//�/ �,;,%i'93 ---- ---H° x999.99 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION kf ,�jl�Iy 2„, /'�%,,' 93_6 \'• - 73.98 ---- �— DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW „o/`� , i/" ' / / ~ ` `� DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE / \Q��� /�� �!/ X938'' \ w —OE—DENOTES OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 14 // / / ��� %j �P 41:01,,,/,...// — / / ^\ ,, \ „,,,_...eI i o DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE / /// ..--• i -- X-, . \' liw, eZ/,iV., / / // /' 4, M 1( ° DENOTES WOOD FENCE I° e DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE � ' r d ,�/���� / / �_% _...._-_-_-- ,--4440, ' �942, \ `\�\I� i ® DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE N t � ��'lji►rl7/ i/ /� - \ \ I I DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT ;` �y 'g ���E /�, / / \ I O DENOTES SOIL BORING W 1�= i��'�/ v, /// j// / I (i i 1 \\\ \ CItY OF EDI�JA '9 / 2y e a \ i y .cylj'f//y�� // / / / I I \ \\ \ ' �h. I \ DENOTES SIGN/POST a r.6.��y� /// //// it` 1 I I a3h'' GREEN I \ \\ , !1, 'TOP HYDFANTK934.36 I N DENOTES GUY ANCHOR j� �jt�//// �/ ( (4,,..., / 1 1 a As// w” I I \ \ / / / I I t I (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE 40, kG /� e3 g,`; \ C�/N\I 1\S® 16- J I \ \ \S00'2T 4"E 1 93 M /1'74 P / I z� I (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE / / / 1;4' ( ) ( ) / 4 ,41:1 � • /,'-- / \ 33' AN \ \ \E. \ GREEN / 1 \ • / / T. �� e+, .� Iii 2 I/� a \ r tt / ;;-92. - "� AS \ \ \\ \ Asp- 1�,� I \ / / DENOTES FLAGS DELINEATING WETLAND / _ _q i \ \ o \ \ 1 / / '/ --'93� ^I / \ GREEN I .�. I \ \ q I / 0 / p y.w,°i \ w W ' / \ °� \� -.9„7,,,,... x /' / ' �'�• �� o MONUMENENOTES WETLANDTOBE INSTALLED) BUFFER ED) ��� I / ASH I �l \ / '/ 0 0 ' / 3 �- -�� �� �� , ��/--� 9' h O1 9 �9 \'936 < / / I I18- / L --_ I a3. I I_ 38\ 3j� ` 9 / FWy j 3hb I /: • \ • _+�- 1•IONEY °' — , - 39--,,933 /93 c-93-- --,,`' /R '. / .. iwf` LOCUST at sIxreoo \ \ \ \ LEGAL DESCRIPTION E-1 Ei _ 11E' / // N \\ \N. N. \ 1 1'� \ SN \ \ N i� \ Lot 7,BRUM'S SUBDIVISION,Hennepin County, /�� a'4 � • /// / \8r \\ d \ \ 1 1 1 p \ \ �94j\ \\\ \ \ \\ \\ I // // W Minnesota,according to the recorded plat thereof. e 3�/ �3332�� /// / 1-10)5.p \\ \ \ \ 11 �.\ - i N \ y / a s eiC/� / \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N \ ` \ \ \ \ Z / / '/ / //avze / \ ,� \ \ . \ ,S�,� V C 1 \ \ h� I \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ NOTES / / ' '/ ' / //°'a \15'�ifl \ \ \ �\ ��I \ 1 1 \ w x I \' \ \ \ \ \ I I 1.THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. / ///// / / / / /a a. *ED \ \�l� �\ 1 I 111�., ,1 I \\ \\ N / / / / / / / ��' __ OQK \ -\,1,t, ,• \ \`-' \ 1 1. ors. T T r-r� \ 2.NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED / / / / / / / /^ .\9 \�`•L /1 I I I I I AA�RI• .N \ I I cp I I I%I F•I /\ I I h- I I \ / / / \ )`I III ► I IE4 I oo Oi .., ., I. ,-, L_L, 3.NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY.THIS / r ` / / /// / °� x° I \ y 11 1 I j I I I I I Zoo SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. /'/ • / / J / / I 1 \I III III ' I I I I I I I \\\\\� ��3p 4.EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER / 1 A / / / '/ I I ► I I III I / I { w LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY //� 9 a/ / / / / // I /,// / i i I /„1 f I o . a a EXISTING\ , o OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY GARAGE\ RESIDENT TESTIMONY.OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE / / Zai / / / / w b,LZcZ.01-,y,,Z,y oltima`5,, 3°j ch / / \ 89.78 -� _ / ALL / / / 1 m N OZ/°Oji�%j j% / /a/a (/ I �l�\�\ T PRESENT.VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES / / / / 1� Lt\ f � /� /� /f��/ / CC ° °U� ❑E— —OE OE i !j SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UT N00'26'46"W 226.04(M) 225.96(P) sae —� UTILITIES BY CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT(651)454-0002 PRIOR TO �° ° ° ° ° ° ANY DESIGN,PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. r\��1 I 1• 1� 1.11 1 1 1 11%11, s r\r—r—• I 6 6 %/I 5L—L—1 • I I w OI ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING� 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. NO. DATE I DESCRIPTION I BY I !# AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JOB NAME: TOM LEACH OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 + a/ st✓ +�e.Y FIELD WORK DATE: 08/14/15 DRAWN BY: EP PROJECT NO.: 15-108 EMAIL: inFoC�edsmn.com WEBSITE: http:J/edsmn.com DATED: 08/18/15 LOCATION: 5526 INTERLACHEN BLVD VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 Q EDINA, MN 55436