Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016 08-24 Planning Commission Meeting Packets Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, August 24, 2016 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission,July 27, 2016 V. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing: Variance request 6511 Ridgeview B. Public Hearing: Variance request 5812 Hidden Lane VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead,the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review - 6600 France Avenue B. Comprehensive Plan Update VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments Xl. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Draft MinutesO Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Minutes y�'1�1fI City Of Edina, Minnesota o ra gi).1' Planning Commission o Edina City Hall Council Chambers •�1'corrr�ni1%�'� ro `'� �~ 4801 West 50th Street July 27, 2016, 7:00 P.M. I. Call To Order Chair Platteter called the meeting to order at 7:04 P.M. . . �4 et �� II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Hobbs, `:eeOlsen, Nemerov, Lee: Thorsen, Strauss, Hamilton, Chair Platteter. Student Members Kivimaki,JMa. Staff present, City Planner, Teague, Gilenbach, Administrati e Specialist, Assistant Planner, Aaker, Communications Coordmatos, e Hoogenakker. Absent from the roll: Bennett ,...•4,, ,. ,0 Ill. Approval Of Meeting Agenda �, A motion was made by CommissionerThorsen to approve<the July 27, 2016 meeting f agenda. The motion wacon s seded by Commissioner Strauss:.All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Miut �, � A motion wasmade b Commissioner Thor`sen`to approve the July 13, 2016, qz meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Commissioner Nemerov noted;he offered a change to the minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried 4, e V. Public Hearings `` A. Variance. Galleria. 3510 Galleria, Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reminded the Commission they tabled the Galleria's request for variances from setback and parking requirements at their July 13, 2016, meeting to allow the applicant time to address traffic calming and way-finding issues. 1iPage Draft MinvtesCX Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Planner Aaker concluded that the applicant has revised the plans accordingly. Appearing for the Applicant Greg Houck, Cunningham Arch. Applicant Presentation Mr. Houck addressed the Commission and explained to them the traffic calming measures that were implemented in the plans at their suggestion. Houck noted,,the following changes: „iiii-n.: • New sidewalk connection to 69`h Street crosswalk . x • • Island was extended to the east into the drive aisle coming from the north, going south to narrow the aisle at that point to slow people�down.str • Add additional painted cross walk and pederian ramp r4 • Drive aisle width was reduced A ,;; • Enhance existing signed crosswalk MM��` ` ;. s • Portion of concrete wall to be removed to allow for pedestrian access to crosswalk. • New painted island. 4' t; ` , • New sidewalk connections:to mail entry the and to` existing 69.h,Street crossing. � ��� .roe `� Continuing Houck also noted that new way finding signage would'be added; however, the Galleria is testing out this signage, addingxthe way finding signage has not been finalized. Public Hears g x d �,k likkn°i. ',,,,,,v,:,„ it Chair Platteter�opened the public.hearingg Less Wanninger, 3209:`Galleria, Edma, MN addressed the Commission adding he supports the changes that were made to..the plan ,;` A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion and Comments A discussion ensued with Commissioners acknowledging the positive revisions made to the plan since the last meeting; however, the Commission offered additional suggestions to include adding more landscaping and creating a raised crosswalk. Mr. Houck responded that he would be comfortable looking into adding additional landscaping or planting a tree on the bump out. With ..........._. 21 Page Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. regard to the raised crosswalk Houck pointed out the difficulty with a raised crosswalk and Minnesota weather/snow removal. Houck said in his opinion pulling out the panel helps the pedestrian flow and safety. Motion A motion for approval was moved by Commissioner Thorsen based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions found in the July 13, 2016 staff report. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Commissioner Hobbs offered an amendment to the motion that approval is also conditioned on adding a tree on the new bump out and to add at least one speed table (raisedcrosswalk) preferably at the location where the panel was removed subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Commissioner Thorsen accepted the amendment.,,Commissioner Strauss was not in favor of the amendment. A secondwas offered by Commission Olsen. Ayes; Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Olsen, Nemerov,:Hamilton, Platteter Nay, Strauss. Motion carried 7-1. . ' v B. Variance. S. Lundberg. 4801 Hilltop Lane.Edina, MND' -,,,,e Staff Presentation Planner Aaker reported that`the applicant is reque ting a 5-foot front yard setback variance to the required 43.6-foot front yard,,setback to construct a new home on the lot located at 4801 Hilltop Lane at<a front street setback of38.6 feet from the front street lot line. The new home will be farther`back from the jr9nt lot line than the existing structure. Aaker explained that the new hoe:,will be t mtwo stories with an attached three car garage, one stall to be tandem behind the two others. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval based on the following findings: I. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with all the standards, with exception of the front street setback (as determined by the adjacent homes). 2. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. 3. The property is subject to an unreasonably deep street setback that diminishes the building opportunity for the lot. 4. The proposed home will be in-keeping with neighboring homes. Wage Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. 5. There is a practical difficulty in meeting the ordinance requirements and there are circumstances unique to the property due to an imposed front yard setback from the adjacent homes and the preservation of an oak tree in the rear yard. 6. The variance, if approved, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new home will be well articulated and will enhance the character of the neighborhood. Approval of the variance is also subject to the following conditions: • Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and,maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions • Survey date stamped:July I, 2016 and subject to rigtneer 's Cnemo. Appearing for the Applicant b Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes '9. x -180 Applicant Presentation Mr. Busyn addressed the Commission ands Xplained�,hat the hor ieowners informed their neighbors of their plans and their neighbors indicated their'support for,the project. ' 4 Public Hearing � � �A r Chair Platteter opened the p blic hearing �No.one slSpke to the issue. „4„0,0,,.: 'E.....'4 ..', . ^.'X y ,`, f A motion,wasrmade by Coma issioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion and Comments k Commissioner Lee commented that:in her opinion the cul de sac was not a practical difficulty; however, the proposed house is comparable in size to neighboring homes. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the variance as submitted based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. 4IPage Draft Minutes© Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. C. Variance. R. Hanson. 5504 Beard Avenue So., Edina, MN Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the applicants are requesting variances from the 1" floor height and over- all height requirements to tear down an existing house and construct a new home at 5504 Bread Ave. So. A variance is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The applicant is proposing to raise the first floor elevation 7 feet above the existing first floor elevation and in turn exceed the maximum allowable height from existing grade by 7 feet. The proposal is to lift the entire grade and strurcture to be at a similar grade and ridge height elevation as the neighbor to the south. Planner Aaker explained that the new home fronts Beard Ave. with the back walk-out facing Minnehaha Creek. The orientation of the home will be elevated from the existing position of the home, (currently lower than the street and lower than the adjacent home to the south). The existing home was built in 1953 and was constructedwith a gr aage and first floor entry at 872.5/872.7. �` Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the variances for property located at 5504 Beard Ave. So. The variances,allow the new home to have a first floor elevation 6 feet above the one foot first floor increase�of t•`e existing home and over-all height 7 feet 4.„,,V,. e'A ;.. higherV,than the 30 foot maximum. ' V Approval is based on the following findings I. The proposal is more inkeeping with surrounding I' floor and ridge heights of nearby homes than the existing home 2. The proposal meets all applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements with the exception of variances requested. 3. The proposed new home is in character with this neighborhood. Variance approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped June 24, 2016. • Building plans and elevations date stamped June 24, 2016. 2. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 51Page Draft Minutes❑X Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. 3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Drainage patterns may not be directed to adjacent properties. 4. Signed and recorded encroachment agreement between the City of Edina and the property owners to remove existing improvements on public property and grade and seed accordingly. Appearing for the Applicant R. Hanson, applicant and property owner. Discussion ,-':'i,:;, e �EE A404, Commissioners asked if a tree plan would be submitted `Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. She said at the time a permit is applied for a.tree plan must be submitted for review and approval by the City Forester. x Commissioners asked Planner Aaker to clarify the variance. Aaker,explained th�athe variance is to allow the property owners to build anew house on the:lot The variance would fallow the first floor elevation of the new home to be 7<feet higher than the existing elevation. Aaker clarified that the City amended the Ordinance to help mitigate building height. Prior to the I-foot change the City had no regulations on changing the grade. The amendment`now requires a variance if the existing elevation is changed more than I foot. Aaker said while this has helped with building height on relatively flat lots there are many instances where a hose could not be re-built if destroyed or razed at the l-foot requirement. With photo's Aaker pointed out the existing house and topography and neighf.ori gp v. s-4,4i,':. * ires. `4 :1*. Applicant Rr'esentation t - K Mr. Hanson addressed the Commission and explained with the aid of graphics how difficult his lot was to work with Hanson said they are planning on retaining as many trees as possible and the plans as presented were designed to reduce disturbance to the site. He said he believes that minimal soil will be removed. He asked the Commission for their support. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Pat Barbatsis, 5508 Beard Avenue, addressed the Commission and stated he supports the project; however, has a concern with the wall. Wage Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none a motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Continued Discussion Commissioners acknowledged the difficulty of the site adding in their opinion the house is well designed. It was also noted that additional sidewall articulation could be considered. 4141.*•.; Motion Arsitt? A motion was made by Commissioner Nemerov to approval the variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. A:second was offered by Commissioner Thorsen. All voted aye. The motion carried 8-0. D. Amendment to Chapter 36 of the Edina City Code—Temporary Family Health Care Units ,..'` ` Planner Presentation ..- ., , '�' K .. T''' Planner Tea ue reported`that the"bmmission is asked to hold a public hearing and consider an g P Ordinance Amendment that would opt the City of Edina out of the recently passed State Legislation requiring cities and counties in Minnesota'to allow temporary family care dwelling units on lots that.are''zoned for sing le.family`residential Use. Teague explained that the new law would:exempt temporary health care dwelling units from typical zoning authority (a second dwelling unit is not allowed in the R-I, Single Dwelling Unit District in the City):and requires cities to approve an application permit for them within I 5-days. Teague further noted that cities may not charger more than $100.00 for a permit. Alk% Teague further explained the requirements that if passed would soon be in effect (September I, 2016). Teague said at this time that City has three options. • Adopt a resolution that would opt the City of Edina out of the legislation. • Do not opt out, and allow the law to take effect. The State law would apply, and the city staff would follow the adopted rules of the State. • Write new regulations to allow this type of use. ._..... ... ................._... 7IPage Draft Minutes© • Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. In conclusion Teague said staff has not had any inquiries in regard to the proposed ordinance. Teague stated staff would recommend that the City opt out and monitor if this is a use that is in demand in Edina. Opting out would also allow the City adequate time for staff review of the process. Discussion and Comments Commissioners had the following questions and observations: • Planner Teague was asked if the City decides to opt out of the ordinance could a resident apply for a variance. Teague said it would depend on if this was considered a use variance or if it was a setback/lot coverage variance. Teague�explained that variances aren't granted for use; however are granted for setbacks etc. • Commissioners asked Planner Teague to clarify for them the general:discomfort of the City if it was decided to "opt in"; adding is it because there is not adequate time to study the issue or is it the small application fee, etc. Planner Teague responded the City has never been approached by a resident for this type of temporary use, adding in his opinion it is a little of both. Teague said'the temporary health care dwelling would probably require a survey (which can be expensive) or'a to scale site plan to determine if the structure meets zoning requirementsTeague further noted the $100.00 fee would not begin to cover staff`involvement if the City opted m • Teague was asked when the City needs to make a decision,on this. Planner Teague responded the ordinance would be in effect on September I, 2016, adding the City would need to have made a decision prior to September I'. He added he doesn't believe there is an "opt out" date Commissioners noted if the'City "opts in" they could always opt out at a later date. • Commissioners also questioned if this is a "manufactured" need or a real need. • Commissioners further observed that there isn't a lot of time to study the ramifications of all three options. September is "around the corner." Planner Teague agreed. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, Edina, MN urged the Commission to "opt in; not out". Chair Platteter asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none a motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 81 Page Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Discussion Commissioner Nemerov observed that in Edina the residents tolerate many things; new house construction; roadway construction, etc., adding in his opinion "tolerating" this temporary use is worthwhile. He said many of the things residents "tolerate" create a better community. Nemerov stated he would be sad if the City chose to "opt out", adding it's inappropriate. Nemerov said he believes the City should "opt in" or write its own Ordinance. A majority of the Commissioners agreed with Nemerov. It was noted the cause is good and it would be premature to "opt out" before the City even knows how this would;,work. It was pointed out if the City "opts in" and find it doesn't work the City could "optout A motion was made by Commissioner Nemerov to not "opt;out" of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment allowing Temporary Family Health Care Dwellings. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Ayes; Hobbs, Strauss, Olsen, Nemerov, Hamilton. Nays; Lee, Thorsen and Platteter. Motion carried 5-3. E. Rezoning and Subdivision. Opus;Development Co: LLC, 5901 Lincoln Drive, Edina, MN (continued from July 13, 2016) Planner Presentation •Planner Teague informed the Commission Opus Development Company LLC is proposing to re- develop 1, a portion of the former United Health Group site at 5901 Lincoln Drive. Children's Minnesota has moved into the existing office building°onthe north and east side of the site. A portion of the existing office building is proposed to•be torn dowrvandreplaced with a four-story 250 unit apartment building, with'a 250 space underground parking rampbuilt in its place. Continuing, Teague reported that a new access off Lincoln Drive would be created for Children's, and another new access created for the apartments.,,The existing access drive would be removed. To accommodate the request, the applicant is requestingkthe following 'I) Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to MDD-5 Mixed Development District,;:2) Preliminary Development Plan with a surface parking stall Variance from 187 surface parking stalls to I I2 with a proof-of-parking plan for 188 total, and 3) Subdivision. Teague explained the "preliminary" review is the first step of a two-step process of City review. If the City Council approves the proposed Rezoning, The second step would be Final Rezoning and Final Site Plan review. With graphics Teague further explained concepts of the proposed project. In conclusion Teague stated staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to MDD-5, Planned Unit Development District, Preliminary 91Page Draft Miriutes❑X . Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Development Plan, and Parking Variance at 5901 Lincoln Drive for Opus LLC., based on the following findings: 1. The proposal contains two distinct and separate uses on separate lots; however, they are linked by an interior sidewalk connection between the two sites, an improved boulevard style sidewalk, and a shared parking arrangement. With the inclusion of affordable housing per the City's Policy, the proposed plans are reasonable to achieve goals within the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Calculating Density within an MDD-5 Zoning District incing both sites would meet the Comprehensive Plan Density Requirement of a maximum of 30 units per acre. By using the MDD-5 for both sites, and calculating the density using both sites assists the applicant to meet the Comprehensive Plan, and allows more units to assist,in providing affordable housing. �� 3. The proposed uses, Office and High Density Residential are consistent with the �Yf` Comprehensive Plan, which guides the site.OR, Office Residentialx4 Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: '� I. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated July 1,;2016 _Final plans,must show allypmechanical,,equipment and the means to screen it. No ground level mechanical equipment'shall be located in front of the building on a public street i, 2. The Final Landsea`kPlan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 `M ;i4 the Zoning Ordinance L 3. The Final Li�htin Plan must meet all minimum landsca in requirementsper Chapter 36 of g g � � P� g q P the Zoning Ordinance. erx 4 x 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated June''I 3, 2016, includingtthe requirement for a development agreement. 5. Affordable housing must be,provided per the City's Affordable Housing Policy, the specifics to be determined at the time of final approval. The applicant is providing fee-in-lieu of affordable housingzto allow;the City to build affordable housing units elsewhere. 6. A shared parking arrangement to allow residents and guests to use the parking ramp on evenings and weekends. 7. The residential site shall be held to the high density residential sign requirements and the office site the planned office district regulations. 8. A construction management plan shall be submitted at the time of building permit application; including hours of construction, construction staging, traffic control, parking, and pedestrian access. Construction management plan shall be subject to approval by city staff. . ................. ...... .... . . 10lPage Draft Minutes❑X Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Continuing, Teague said staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new two lot subdivision at 5901 Lincoln Drive for the proposed project based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: I. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to MDD-5, Mixed Development District. 2. The Final Plat must be considered within one-year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void. 3. The Final Plat must show drainage and utility easement over the floodplain. 4. The Park Dedication fee of $1,250,00 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the f . Final Plat. '' .•' 4i ., Appearing for the Applicant Phil Cattanach and Dean Newms, Opus Discussion and Comments `, Commissioners raised the following; f A� `� j,,''4..''‘ 1<<„,,,,4.40 • Planner Teague wasked what the height requirements are afor the subject site. Planner Teague responded that aximum building height for the subject site is 4-stories or 48- feet. The height of the proposed building is 42-feet/4-stories. • Planner°Teague was asked'`to clarify what/who triggers enforcement of a Proof of Parking Agreement (POP). Planner Teag]e responded that both the applicant and or City Manager/City Planner can implement the POP. He noted that 90% of the POP's are still in force; however, there areinstances where the applicant built out the POP. He noted the Galleria entered into a POP for additional ramp levels, however, at the time of construction they chose to build those levels. Teague said the applicant always has the option to implement the POP. The City can act on a complaint basis or if the City through observation etc. deems that those spaces should be implemented. • Planner Teague was asked to clarify the Affordable Housing policy and the fee inl lieu option. Planner Teague explained that this is a recently adopted policy that applies to all multi-family developments of 20 or more units. The policy requires new rental developments to provide a minimum of 10% of all rentable units as "affordable". Teague noted that condition can be waived in certain circumstances. Teague said in this instance the applicant is proposing to pay a fee in lieu. Teague said the City Council (if they 11IPage Draft Min ites0 Approved Minutes El Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. choose this option) would establish the fee. The Commission does not determine the fee.. • Commissioners questioned if the proposed rezoning of the site to mixed use is really "mixed development". They further questioned if the entire site would be rezoned to mixed use. Commissioners pointed out the site would contain only two uses, adding it is not what is typically seen on a mixed use site. Planner Teague responded that the entire site would be rezoned MDD-5, Mixed Use Development. Teague said the City established the mixed use designation before the City had PUD. Continuing, Teague acknowledged the City has wrestled with mixed use,; butfin`,this instance the connection to the trail system and shared parking could also be considered as a mix of uses. • Planner Teague was asked who provides the traffic analysis Planner Teague responded that the City hires the traffic consultant with it paid for by the applicant. Teague said the City provides the criteria that are used to compile the traffic analysis. Applicant Presentation Phil Cattanach addressed the Commission thanking them for the`'opportunity to pre'Sent their proposal. Cattanach told the Commission they held a neighborhood meeting and many residents of the area attended. Cattanach said in their o eipioninthis is a great location for multi-housing pointing out the immediate office uses in the area would make this an,attractive place to live. n N Cattanach introduced Deaewins to present the protect. Mr. Newins addressed the Commission and with graphics reported that the subject site will be redeveloped with a 250-unit luxury apartment complex, Newins said the building is 4-stories with below • grade parking Continuing, Newins`pointed out the project is in a location that takes full advantage of the neighboring amenities to include?excellent freeway access. Newins noted that the development team also c esigned the project to respond to the France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles. Continuing, Newins explained the changes in access points which include removal of the existing access and replacing it with,two accesses; one for Children's and one for the apartment complex. He further pointed out the pedestrian linkage to the retail component and explained the Proof of Parking agreement. Newins continued his presentation noting with regard to affordable housing that the applicant has requested paying a fee in lieu instead of providing the affordable housing units. In conclusion of his presentation Newins asked for the Commissions support. Discussion and Comments 12IPage Draft Minutes❑X Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. • Commissioners thanked the applicant for addressing the affordable housing component offering fee in lieu ; however, they questioned if they are viewing the " final product". They pointed out the plans could look different if affordable housing was directed to be added; questioning if the amenities would be the same, would the materials be the same etc. Mr. Cattanach responded that the ordinance requiring a percentage of affordable housing is very new to the City, adding the development team is working closely with the City on this issue. • The applicant was asked who they believe there market is. Mr. Newins responded that he believes the majority would be professionals and empty nesters. He said the goal is intergenerational. • It was further suggested that the applicant reconsider the pedestrian crossing from the site to the retail across the street and add flashing lights. Commissioners stated they want the applicant to ensure that the pedestrian crossing element is enhanced either by flashing lights and/or clear delineation (sign, striping). It was stressed (because of the curve in the road) that the crosswalk needs to�,be as visible and safe as possible. Public Testimony Ni• . wow Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. '`® a. " , The following expressed their opinion on the propos: $ ... r . Alan Gallaher, 5744 Duncan Lane, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission Jennifer Albright, 6818 Langford Drive, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Georgene Swartz, 6105 Lincoln Drive, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Steve Lienertz, addressed the Commission. Carolyn Peterson, 6969 Langford Drive, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Y ��� Bruce Totten, 6940 Langford Drive, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Pam Albinson, 6105 Lincoln Drive,Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Allen Constatini, 6942 Langford Drive, Edina, MN, addressed the Commission. Those who spoke expressedthe opinion that the project was too large for the site and the timing of the project wasn't the best pointing out the closing of 169 for road repair. Further concern was expressed over an increase in traffic, the reduction in parking stalls, construction traffic and parking, building aesthetics, building materials, drainage and nuisance concerns over noise, lighting, headlight wash etc. A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen, seconded by Commissioner Strauss to close the public hearing. 13IPage Draft Minutest Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Continuing Discussion and Comments • The applicant was asked if an apartment mix was established. Mr. Newins responded in the affirmative, adding roughly 25% of the units are 2-bedroom, 55% I-bedroom, adding he believes the rest would be studio and a few 3-bedroom units. • Commissioners acknowledged the concerns expressed by residents over the closure of 69 and asked the applicant how they would enforce appropriate construction parking and construction vehicle use on Lincoln Drive by workers and equipment. Mr. Newins responded that construction parking will occur on site, adding they are going to provide a construction traffic plan from the onset. He reiterated all contractors would be made aware of the traffic challenges and would follow the plan accordingly. Continuing, he also pointed out not all workers would show up on "day` I". Construction traffic would be dispersed throughout the length of theproject".Newins said he,,hopes when 169 is finished the final interior building stages would`occur noting that this is the busiest time on a project. • Commissioners asked the applicant if they ever considered flipping the building. Mr. Newins said that was considereow d, hever, when keeping�in mind the topography and working with Children's the plans,;presented work best • Commissioners noted during the public hearing residents expressed concern over the possibility of headlight wash. It was noted that°the Manor Homes are at a higher elevation and with additional landscaping headlightwash shouldbe.;minimal • Commissioners expressed displeasure with the quality of the plans presented and the lack of depth. Commissioners pointed out the materials submitted did not contain a lighting plan; no three dimensional sections`or aerials/flybys were provided which are helpful in visualizing th"e project. A discussion ensued on if the`proposal hould be tabled because of the lack of clarity in the plans. The Commission"also reiterated their opinion that they would rather have the developer provide the 10% affordable housing units per.code rather than the fee in lieu. Planner Teague interjected that the project is under the state statute time-line, adding the timeline is up on September 7th. Chair Platteter suggested that;the Commission had enough information to vote on the proposal as presented. He said the Commission should act on what is before them, adding the process needs to be forwarded to the City Council for its next phase. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the request for preliminary rezoning with variances and subdivision based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. 14IPage Draft Minutes❑X Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Ayes; Thorsen, Strauss. Nays; Hobbs, Lee, Olsen, Nemerov, Hamilton, Platteter. Motion failed. A motion was made by Commissioner Nemerov to recommend denial of the request for preliminary rezoning, variance and subdivision based on the following findings. • Lack of affordable housing. • Lack of a lighting plan. • The plans lack detail concerning traffic calming measures, to include revisiting Lincoln Drive and the visibility at the first curve, look into the possibility of restriping Lincoln Drive and depict a measured enhancement of the pedestrian crosswalk. • Provide better building site sections (especially at the south end) and building plans that have more depth. More can be done to help everyone envision the project. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the rri'ot'on. All Commissioners voted aye. The motion to deny carried 8-0. or Vie, Chair Platteter noted the request would proceed,to the City Council for their meeting on August 16th. F. Site PlanV7600 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN for Wold Architects on behalf of Edina Public Schools. t Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Wold Architects on behalf of Edina Public Schools is requesting construction of a new 77,500 square foot transportation center at the vacant property located at 7600 Metro Boulevard. The office portion of the building would be 5,400 square feet; the maintenance area, 12,000 square feet; and the bus storage area 60,000 square feet. Planner Teague explained that the School District recently purchased this property with the intent to relocate the existing transportation center, located in the Grandview area to the subject property. This property was recently subdivided off from portion of the property occupied by Film Tec. Access to the site is available off 76th Street and Edina Industrial Boulevard. A I 0-foot tall black chain link security fence is proposed to protect the site. Teague stated to accommodate the request a site plan review is required. Teague further noted that the project meets all City minimum zoning ordinance standards. ....._....._..... 15IPage Draft Minutes0 Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the site plan based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets all Edina City Code standards for a Site Plan. 2. The proposed use is allowed in the PID, Planned industrial district, and would generate less traffic than a traditional office or light industrial land uses. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: I. • Site plan date stamped July 6, 2016. 4�4, • Grading plan date stamped July I, 2016. • Landscaping plan date stamped July 6, 201,6, • Building elevations date stamped July I, 2016. • Building materials board as presenat the Planning Commis tedsion and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements, including the planting of three additional trees.`Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and,one half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion contr® , -asur s4Spacing of the coniferous trees shall be increased along they west lot lin * � �� `�" Ark 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any requ red landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the:,Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions.to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. r`r Appearing for the Applicant k p Angela Otteson &Wold Architects Engineer Discussion and Comments . ` �� a �`Y Commissioners expressed tie following: • It was recommended to add as a condition of approval that the approach be striped for two lanes to avoid the potential of one vehicle blocking the entire approach. This condition should be added to ensure adequate traffic operations during the peak time periods. Planner Teague agreed. Applicant Presentation Ms. Otteson addressed the Commission explaining the new facility and site will include an office to serve as a headquarters for operations as well as a gathering space for employees. It will also include a .... ..............._.... .............. .. ........ .. 16 Page Draft Minutes© Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. maintenance bay, bus wash, fuel station and indoor vehicle storage. Continuing, Otteson said a storm water management plan will be submitted to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for their review and approval. Ms. Otteson presented a materials board indicating cement block and contrasting metal panels will be used on the building facade. Public Hearing Chair Platteter opened the public hearing. Jim Simpson, Max Development, 5300 Edina Industrial Boulevard Edina, MN addressed the Commission. 44, Discussion and Comments " A discussion ensued on the solar array depicted on the plans and if the location was correct how would the storm water be managed. Ms. Otteson responded there is no current plan for a solar array; however, it is a goal of the District to be as "green",as possible. Otteson said if in the future the District proceeds with a solar array or solar "everything would need to be reviewed to include storm water management, roof pitch and roofload(if located to the roof). She reiterated at this time it is future goal. The Commission questioned the Iocation of the fence and-fence materials. Ms. Otteson said the fence materials are black chain iljnk, adding the,fence is designed to protect the buses. The Commission suggested that the fence be<ipulled as far,back as possible from the street and squared off. It was further recommended that more landscaping be added to soften the site. Commissioners indicated that in their opinion the building expanse needs to be softened. It was further suggested that to soften the mass add more landscaping elements. Ed Terhaar addressed the Commission and clarified the traffic report. Terhaar reported the proposed project is expected,to,generate 115,trips during the 6:00-7:00 a.m. hour, I 17 trips during the 8:30-9:30 hour, 115 trips during the 1:45-2:45 p,m. hours, and 117 trips during the 4:00-5:00 p.m. hour. Terhaar said it is believed that all intersections will operate at acceptable levels of service during all time periods. He noted that trip generations are spread out over multiple hours during both a.m. and p.m. hours, adding the roadways are adequately designed to accommodate bus traffic. Terhaar said no mitigation measures are needed to accommodate the project. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to recommend site plan approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include the conditions that the approach (Edina Industrial Boulevard) be striped for two lanes to avoid the potential of one vehicle 17IPage I Draft Mir utesN - Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. blocking the entire approach; add additional landscaping facing Edina Industrial Boulevard; and the fence shall be moved back away from Edina Industrial boulevard to square it off evenly across the front. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Community Comment Chair Platteter opened community comment. No comments. 04� A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close Community Comment. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Allkvote ;aye. The motion to close Community Comment carried. 8-0 fi e.k �,e4 d4x'� 4 O t"�tik ,xx VII. Reports and Recommendations AO , None. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions.; , " , Chair Platteter acknowledged back of packe materials '', ' ," IX. Chair and Member Comments '+ , Chair Platteter informed the Commission and audience that the regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission on August I0th was cancelled .The Planning Commission will next meet on �`� August 24th. ‘,...;. :cK """ X. StaffComments 4 :ot ,� ` 4 ,4.,,a,;,*, ,x kir Planner Teague said he will be gatering Comprehensive Plan materials for the August 24th meeting. 4 b w Xl. Adjournment", . A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission at 11:35 p.m.' The'motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. jezed4 / iii - , .. .... . ..............._...... 18IPage (.133A ° II' o PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT velnepa R / t58 Originator Meeting Date Agenda# Kris Aaker August 24, 2016 B-16-15 Assistant Planner Recommended Action: Approve a front street setback variance of 13.32 feet for a new home to be setback the same distance from the front/side street lot line as the existing home to be torn down that is located at 5812 Hidden Lane. Project Description: The subject property is a corner lot located in the north east corner of Dundee Road and Hidden Lane. The proposal is to tear-down the existing home and replace it with a new home within the existing setbacks along Hidden Lane and Dundee Road that are provided by the current home. The existing home has a 37.83 foot setback from Dundee Road and 72.5 foot setback from Hidden Lane. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND The property owner is requesting to tear down the existing home and build a new one story home with attached three car garage in a location that does not meet the front yard setback along Dundee Road. Section 36-439 requires a front yard setback equal to the setback of the abutting home to the north on a corner lot if there is a home adjacent that faces the street. The abutting home is setback farther from Dundee than the existing nonconforming house currently on-site. The proposal needs a variance approved in order to construct a new single story home in the location of the existing home. The subject property is approximately 28,019 square feet in area. There are two adjacent single-family homes, one to the north facing Northwood Drive/Dundee Road and the other adjacent to the east facing Hidden Lane, with both affecting the required front yard setback for the subject property. The home to the north, (a recent tear-down re-build) is located 51.4 feet from the property line along Dundee, and the home to the east is located 72.5 feet from Hidden Lane. e SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses The property is surrounded on all sides by existing single-family homes located in the neighborhood. Existing Site Features The subject lot is 28, 019 square feet with an existing single-family home on the property. Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-Family District Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Engineering The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application, and his memo is included in the packet. There are no major concerns with run off or grading on this lot. Building Design The proposal is to tear down the existing home and construct a new two story home on the property from the front lot line equal to the existing home. The home is approximately 5,400 square feet. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed Front & Side Street - Match the abutting home *37.83 feet Side- 10 feet 19.7 feet Rear- 25 feet over 25 feet Building Height 2 1/2 stories, 40 Ft One story Lot Area 9,000 s.f. or avg. of nbhd 28,019 sq. ft Lot Width 75 feet or avg. of nbhd 141 feet Lot coverage 25% Less than * Variance Required 16% 2 Primary Issues Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Below are factors to weigh in considering this request: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with all the standards, with exception of the front street setback along Dundee Road (as determined by the adjacent re-built home to the north fronting Dundee Road/Hidden Lane). 2. The new home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. 3. The proposed home is located within the same front yard setbacks as the existing home. 4. The variance will allow the home to be located within a similar location as the existing home. The re-built home to the north was moved farther back on the lot than the original home that had been located on it, requiring a much deeper setback along Dundee Road for the subject home. Originally the neighboring home was located 41.21 feet from Dundee ROW with the new home re-built more than 10 feet farther back on the lot and affecting the subject property's ability to locate a new home, (see last 2 pages attached to this report of previous and current home surveys of the property to the north) . • Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. It is reasonable to replace a home in a similar location, (actually farther back), as the existing home that was originally constructed on the property and didn't require a variance from location at the time of construction. Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the 3 applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes that the proposed location of the home is reasonable. The variance allows a continuation of a setback that has always been provided on the lot for the garage with the main portion of the house along Dundee farther back from the street than the setback of the original house on the adjacent lot to the north. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self- created? The unique circumstance is the requirement to match the neighbor's front yard setback and the large front street setback required resulting from the rebuilt home to the north. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new home will complement the existing neighborhood homes and will match setbacks that historically have always occurred on the lot. Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variances based on the following findings: 1. The proposed location of the house is reasonable. It will be located the same distance to the street as the existing home. 2. The one story home is appropriate in size and scale and is well within all other ordinance requirements. 3. A practical difficulty in this instance is the deeper front yard setback of the rebuilt home to the north. 4. The proposed home will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed new home and requested front yard location will complement the existing neighborhood homes and maintain a setback that has historically been on site since the original home was constructed. 4 Approval shall be subject to the following: Plans and survey dated stamped: July 25, 2016. Engineering memo dated: August 8, 2016. Watershed Review/District Permit. Deadline for a City Decision: September 23, 2016. 5 Hennepin , ilTretzte,, :',..... , cunt r , ertMap , ii„,,,,,,,,7;,,,,,,:,,,,i,\:::.;:::1,,ics,;II:, ,i, Date: 8/16/2016 ie. :; �,�!� {{ d e ar 1-,.4""A''''1.6,, tl , g - - i F k4' ' ' ' a -` , r , ,�, C��i C;1_ i''' I L '4 _ ��yrgq $ Xt �,ilWl/. px, `x ' lir 1 .� '''..,4:1 A4. .T 4 sF .'.4 Y 's '..1.411*' .,,, ..,, 41I' , ',.,,,l':14(''''' 41,,,,';':.411:y`;:t,:..:e„,:;4; '''' *' 1,1 ::ii'i 44,,..4,°T.,,,,,,*:'' ' it'''' '' ' T. P i, , , .. . .., ,.. .. . . . ..„. . . , . ..... ms's. , ..c :any rib - _ ! , ''' :,,, ..'..' ., ,. ,... t-'. a ,,, .r,:,t:ii„:„i i,,,,,:t...;::; ,'':,,,, 1 inch 50 feet PARCEL ID: Comments: OWNER NAME- PARC EL ADDRESS: 5812 Hidden La, Edina MN 55436 PARCEL AREA: 0.65 acres, 28,145 sq ft SALE PRICE SALE DATA SALE CODE: This data(i)is furnished'ASIS'with no ASSESSED 2015, PAYABLE 2016 accuracy;(ii)i as to completeness or y;(ii)is furnished with no PROPERTY TYPE: Residential warranty of any kind;and(iii)isnotsuitablee HOMESTEAD: Homestead for legal,engineering or su beyabl purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany MARKET VALUE: damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 CCIUNTY 2als PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: AI .. 1 elevation A division of Streeter&Associates HEMPEL RESIDENCE ®5812 HIDDEN LANE VARIANCE NARRATIVE July 25, 2016 On behalf of our clients, Jon and Heidi Hempel, we are requesting a variance from the setback ordinance on the Dundee Road side of their property. Our intention is to remorie the existing structure currently residing on their lot and build a new structure that utili±es the same setback on Dundee Road as the existing structure. By granting a setback variance, our clients will have the opportunity to utilize the property in the same way they do now and still be well under the average corner street setbacks of adjacent properties. By way of background, Jon and Heidi purchased the lot located at 5812 Hidden Lane in February of 2012. They purchased this property with the hope of significantly remodeling the existing structure. They engaged Murphy and Co. Design in March of 2012 to begin the work of designing the remodeling project. After the design work was complete, the project was sent out for estimating. The remodeling costs were so significant that Jon and Heidi made the decision to demolish the existing house and build a new home in its place that better suited their intended lifestyle. Murphy and Co. Design then began designing a new home in the current home's location. Not long after the new home was designed and bid out, Jon was confronted with a health challenge that effectively put their project on hold for over a year. When Jon and Heidi regrouped this past Spring, they engaged Murphy and Co. Design along with Elevation Homes, to simplify the previous design. It's important to note that with Jon's current health condition, the living spaces on the home are focused on one level. And with the current setbacks and program needs to the home, there are challenges making the property work given the new setback along Dundee. Similar to the existing house, the new house design calls for an "L" shaped, single story structure that makes the most of its beautiful setting and preserves a number of mature trees on the lot. The most significant tree is a 36" diameter Maple tree in the back yard. The house is designed to give ample clearance for the continued sustainability of that Maple tree as well as to provide recreational space in the back yard for their children. In a preliminary review of the project with City staff, it was discovered that the proposed location of the new house did not conform to the setback being enforced on the Dundee Road side of the property. The home was designed utilizing the current home's setback of 37.8'. However, it was brought to our attention that the enforced setback is based on the setback established by their neighbor to the north (5821 Northwood). That setback from Dundee is 51.4'. The 51.4' setback at 5821 Northwood is due in large part to the unique shape of that lot (it is a pie piece shaped lot that has a significant radius along Dundee). The other corner lots in the immediate neighborhood (please see attachments) are more rectangular shaped and have structures that are parallel to the east/west OOeDt8dstreet they face. In the case of 5821 Northwood, ��8S��8t /@0��VVOOd) DundeednannebnaUyand turns 9Udegrees toturn into (Northwood) 5821 N»�h«voodiaoriented tothat dro U KoeU� Thah»«mg �hot000up/em oornpar/aontVthe other pnoped/eainthe area (corner and non-corner|ota>. It is an directly the setback for the L�' neighborhood - -. eau-,eotpnoperty. By comparison, 5821 Northwood's 51.4' setback is over 30' further than the side street vhichh8«eoD8m8nsgeoatboCkofoppnox/ nahy/y2O'' Under the ordinance, the subjct property woul dba required to have a 51.4' setback, which would take away over a third of the property to develop, while a 20' setback vou|dtake away only 17Yofthe property. Given the information ab0va, it's clear that the variance will not alter the characterfth neighborhood. In uontnary, it will make it b� more conforming with the other c o e properties. In addition, this circumstance is directly a result of the ne/ hb ' ornor 5821 petitionNorthvvuod /vvhohas a/gneda «e �oaupport�havar�on Q 0raoatbaokot nnany other neigh' ora). Finally, the subject pnope�ycannot beput trequeot' along w/dh« a andfor the d/9ntgiven the 'current health prognarnneeds ofthe family, in egregious setback along Dundee. |y' n /|gktofthe It is our contention that our client should be able to maintain their current setback fro Dundee and not have that setback derived from oneighboring property that /G m ononna/yinthe neighborhood due tothe acUooentstreet's orient8t/0n We do not believe aD apprOv8/ ofthisv8rjoDCeoataad��ou/tprecedent oGthe proposed �a tbvu:k already rao�y Thank you for your consideration. July 25, 2016 Subject: Variance application 5812 Hidden Lane Edina Planning Commission: By signing this petition, I am expressing my support for Jon&Heidi Hempel as they apply for a variance with the city of Edina. I understand that the variance will allow them to build their new home in place of the existing structure residing on their lot at 5812 Hidden Lane. The new structure will utilize the same setback to which the existing structure conforms. I do not see that this will cause any detriment to the neighborhood in any way. ' Iii, p, ki,,,,,__ w L.,,,,, - i i { , , :),,,,,,„ , „ __ ,o, 4 L0 3. L-L--- CL-g I____1,i,-,xi b ccibc- 14:4-i .g-e\_ LY 's,-,,,,,f4._ 4. Q-- /{- � L-K Por4 k( e<:_c _s-- "PA-x.., - 5. lk1 -T • 6. Z LSI ak„Ir /pi ' 4v1 ' 7 vit / ,g ., _ 7. re,.. ) 4 _ ; /i , 1.-;-t i k_ L.,,,,,L, e i.,,„/ ,51...„ 8.fgr � C 340 ar�-� 11, a , 9. it/C./ ._ l d , - - 4 530 i a _____ . , #. 1 I 1 11. 1 1 } 4 July 25, 2016 Subject: Variance application 5812 Hidden Lane Edina Planning Commission: By signing this petition, I am expressing my support for Jon &Heidi Hempel as they apply for a variance with the city of Edina. I understand that the variance will allow them to build their new home in place of the existing structure residing on their lot at 5812 Hidden Lane. The new structure will utilize the same setback to which the existing structure conforms. I do not see that this will cause any detriment to the neighborhood in any way. 1. c 2. / SPZCJ //I/ ,f1 ) • iv) u � a,.' off, it, VE 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation �: , � .� _-tom - ll� vtv , r A. ` . : , rx. , _ , , i, f .... ..? . ,_,....,... ii., - - ...., '41.11141141 , . ''''.:11':,'1'''. C:471"-"I"j11131§11,' S T TIacE- it+ -, ' , 4 ,„ ' - .,,4* 1 s .► , r T � � �'� ,- iii Ilk.- , 1. f ., C},,I I i ii ! � � " !r-,,, 4v.sor 4, , i i: 4 4, it" tA - .4 6 aA. . - ,� _ *07 c Lr kit4a:- - - ; 4 T."- - t 1" t � # 4tea. 7 ;. _ . , _ __ _� ., Y F figure 1-0 Mirror Lakes Subdivision Additional corner lots;like in kind to subject parcel Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation nnepin Hennepin County Property M p Date:7/20/2016 , Yu wx K t Y 1 4 r . t _. .. y s -- spa a ata:.' i ..�0 , N rf i 4 -4 1 , - N. C_,,.: /7 I,,rt 1inch =50feet figure 1-1 5801 Northwood Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback (to Mirror Lake Drive) 14'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback (to Northwood Drive) 55'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ennepin Hennepin County PropertY kAaPDate: 7/20.12016 c, r ; _ 7 ,# °'i-#,'tom; f. ; *" d Kx ' I,per .. ... T"�' . ' r '1,yt,s t • 1 t'''''-..:::° .=., 171-0 ,- ": ' : ' '-'11; alg .. 4 , ..,... Ai 1 it , it b ^ ,. ,. *.. ..IA f .=,. - t1. Y M'`-M 4 4 '�th $. - i 4 4 if s r N + 1 inch=50 feet figure 1-2 5800 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lake Drive) 20' 0" f/ Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) N Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ennepin ,ap Date:7/20/2016 ob J44 •' 4, sA a ftM S k �R k 04 f .n /i i G t ' *ti lab ••K < ¢ �,,� va 1 ,•• . '- i k1A y♦ 4a 1 lAy. n _ gu re 1-3 ' 1 inch =50 feet 5813 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback (to Dundee Road) Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) 20'-0" +/_ 78'-0" +/_ Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation "e°'nHennepn County Property Map Date: 7120!2016 t _ , r ,,,:„...,'tk . ; , 110 . . `r tri x: fii Iftie 4 .•.. «- ' '_ - 1 1 . f i t . r I , .„ .,1 4. '' I. .1„;1'4,44:14.;":441,. 1,4$...,„:.44";;.t 4:, i , f If' S ' - i r,„ I '.f,,,'' . "�# :.rid '4 ,m! 1i1. �, = 1 at inch=50feet figure 1-4 5801 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lakes Drive) 24'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) 55'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ennepin H n n e p a o t Property rt M a p Date:7/20/2016. ., , ,., , ,. , -1,- 4o i 'u' l K .1144 .. 44;,' ",, *# i4 r St ' `f bw, v h S _ ' ,,,k,„'i , ; * ,,,,, # , „,,,,,...44'.a ,,,,' iii . 2, ,t, , , • 1 c. i N — figure 7 S 1 inch =50 feet 5808 South Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback (to Dundee Road) 27'-0” +/- Approximate front yard setback (to South Drive) 75'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date:7/20/2016 ' « . i , i ;, ., , s ff �+ 1 � t t �+ M fi t s a # -44,,,,,,A r , , .JJ1, Se1 ,,, f ! .4 . ....„1- ,,, .., ., r t ,, asiiiiit ; -WIt 46 '^'fir ilk * 11116 ,.)0 . . Air 411 a■nrsA ini ,, ,, 4 r 4,m, t 0 4:4,,, , 4 `' .., ' 4**1, #- I ' ' rit +. t ., 1 inch -50 feet figure 1-6 5800 South Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lakes Drive) 14'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to South Drive) 70'-0" +/- • a of LI o 3 ��' ttIll - G^y5 o Y & 2.22 a'}z 3Nb-1 N30�IH 2485 a z 02 tg1; iL q I Lg §� € 30N3aIS3�l 13dW3H ' f gla zg. 3 a$, -- a]''z 1 a„„„ .. ao uouonaismo AUN°mod°. ii g ° o g a4w $ a I id”, a Tsi iggfl3 m;=z i- lligggREgilgilig .$$ 2zi3>>>AgsY3s$g ; 20 I Iado Q�U ° �4Aea$x000�so „R - I s. Aye 11 11 iiii °9° $assaa1owgar ”ooefr$Eaa810 I I 1 1 ,, ii zgf ° ao3,igg va€i>.!! Los° I. S I a y 1 °d • w 3 ^ 23Wogww`' g8 4< 20 - 0g.g to °ore o iA 1 "'1111="__U1fili l a ilillig111n 1'1 aa11 1111 1 1.11g;39"_2sg`_'0'=_$G gEOA;359:gt°EgsElli 4giiisg 1111111do ES d ` I I 1 I. : 1UJd T 'i Ifi . .45a1 o .45ab o 0 i 3355 I�IIIIIIIIIII.IIIII naScvs§B§eBaaa.°oe$e €2sdw.:-,1 L;5g--gWa °°0$41 o m m I I ,a«walx,§ssdaa<.<,mm.,mmeBm,agg9nL3gs,,° • < . ; ' '....,:a. : .....2. 3 1 --. I–. ' 1 --mI — ".;\ a'� a i 4 ll f + •1- 15 \ -. ......:. ..--.... �1y a ip j �.. 'a, z a 1. 1 0 - F w f ✓..R � m 4D a a—_- i; ` ss3aaav O "s yapp�@a wg �I g 3ON34IS32113dW2H I G iti Ii 1 02 lili Y9_ i I I 1 I 9 :JO NOI101I8llSN00 M3N 0350dOtld L« tm y � I ' i SII §1o'ii 411 .5 j ,I i gl �l h8u8S'I° -�-R: I 1' r wa U olw �_ t .w Bi• g s!LL gi 188 II 69_L1=7 02'96L=21___.•90.fA-7a _ 1 .I I I I I 1 I 6' \ I a I a \ I- I–I N w \fn d i' II °a- K -—I \ L I N I ----- — — .—' _ r I I VII I Mill t. I co III ` j1 II \\ I "a e k,ri1 oQ$m I �� . I Nw m3N: II \ 1 �. I 1 �' Ta :1 II I III _ oQZoowo \lI �U 'OS I II o.-LLLL.-I I I—t \I \ of III I 6 O=o°r_w I ' I I g I C amwu�mc9 „ I $, III r� I -----_— I,/ ---- I L r II 3a,Y 1 1 I T i 1 I \ I 0 —J �w I I to I 1 i II --J° II 1 L_ I II IVi - I I m I \ I II ,, I 1 I izi. I L� I �/ 0 I / I \ q i49s I \ .�k..Ofi BL. 1b7h y'. - 1..'.. �. II hhrh,•00 y ���� zy gLL '� M i'� O ...• . .---, r Eh.21 g .g , ' v 92111 12 PIP Vi 6.1i1111 ! iliii : L . , ,I.g,g, ,i1 Eg ,6.1. 1111, ',--- -----,-,. ENVIN30,211-1 ZI.83 I ' 30N3C11S3113dIAJDH ' ' ' 4'1 — ul g . gs_f -g ,.. i .;-i i-' R''..il' r6 in P.C.' ----Z.! Yl..11iii7.1 Illim 12efit giiiiR i ,I..!9Jg!i .t11 5,gg ?,3.-.; < Q.x 5555_ !5 i ,ON01101181SNOOM9N C3S0dOtld_ ' /g 1 ii"! 14 11 i Wg W2 g!ill ill18. /115 .N4Eg P. ii..1-1 11 I ..., .........4., Iv, t: ii q 4, __,,,_r___ L_ _s_g.,,,:,__ .,,z_y_.20...,„_,__ • ifill,,i 1.9 / , . .:, \\ 1 / / 1 \\ I ‘ i / B.n I 2 . I I ( .. - Ep 1 \ I I / 1E gE .S§ ° I fi 0. „. . . i Al to. ,. ! . \ 1 I I 1 111 11 ill la a.4 / / ,,„ <,,,,, ; / / 1'. ‘ 1 V 11 \ 1 " 1 I 14. / / i k !it ii 1 .6c ...,' \ li I I NI, \ E i -- --i-g P, - -' 3 , I 5..0. ,,,.. \ _ _ _ _.._ 9 7 NW Mite -1\— --5 Itr , 1 _ __•_••91 __, r .•,,,,,,. . V...t., 1 $ 1 — I 1 1 1 gi n NIIII t .0,o I 1 f 71 1 R'irl'i:53- . 0 I L4 iglr",• 131g-',LT 5i \241 `...i., ?i , ! \. . , i\. [ \ I , L I _ ,.:1 .1 i I 1 I 1 1 -././ 1 2 2 \ 1 0 s cc (!1 it 11 i:Iii g: g 'gl gri o -- --- , 1 411 ' III 7 , g ., , 920. - I. , 4. . , Ii , ft . _, I ----I-v.-- I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I l I r 1 4 p .r 'VII! s SSaaav ,1-;)Js r5p■ a lli N g ... - 1 33N3QIS3I 13dW3H 5. 1 C1 miM it JO NONOOtlLSN00 NUN OSSOdOtld L. 11111 i „, mie t I1` Iii `.� lay y 11 E'� .a iii ! inn a ir 22. L g �� .I 111 I _ Iii__ a nr.., ,,".12-11 1 a +�I dtg 111V 1-:i • fl I I —_-- ! elft J- 1 --- ` - J I. i3 3 �''� i\g e ` 2 6e 30 1< ! :' - 4 4� Si Ee r- II i' x I { 1 , . <I ;7,1 [, , ITh.•`'Zi ./ 1 4. u ,Atb k,A ,440. . . SS3OCIV " 111Z !..g.11'4 L9 ]0N]alS9ei 13d1/13H Sm!ql 111111g$411 . I iig,..i. NiAlalig i I o NouonuisNoo M3N 03S0dOild : ‘.,.• / I / / / / / r // • - - / i I _II= ,I. / I_ 2 I......_..:11 1 01•I'q 0 _I dil1 / / / iThiliBMI f 1 0 ..:0 ' ir I i / , --, , ..., 1 / sz I I j' /ft -----4---mi ii iltrIllii"',„' P:I ,I. I I , 1 ! V !,-M Ermap-1---ii r 7,•;----Erargaig= H =GI A , 1-,• •• -. .. ...-, i I) II] iiii I TI-__0111 11:111•!:Ill, , pp __-. B ii If° --_---q-, ! % I ,I i Lii210-— E 140 1 _ 1 P 11: i i 1 ,. V r 11111.• 1 10> 1 1 ,i. I '\,•••• I-- 0 1 ii„NI -iiPt 1] 1 .1 1 r 1 _ -,: L _„,-- 1 F N 11 - L _11; r- 1 2 2 1 I \ r i irrkilt4i 1 Nil 1. c-,) __ 1 1 ? 1116 .. . • ----- - -IrrAVA - ---L -1--'---- L.--E1 4, —- : 1 1 17t- %'fejEA4,..* .---- t" 7<-5. - 5- pril_L. „_„..„„„„„7„‘rze075.a/Vx,../ M:<>'4 4-, . .&'. , ''''.". I 1 11 -<> I 3 — JL II-- I - l''-W -----=—",a i'-i 1 t‘ 11: t '‘ ,A-=4)1 -,"), )''-- il r.---\ .-H " 1 LE ti ' 'I ill' t-.1 '-'11 %. ''SrAgra -r ' ' 01 H I ),.......i se I , ; \,!. j,„,- -,.,-• j ii; i 1 'j I . ' . ......;„ gl .--4,,..,/1- '-`1 11 - -_,,J,' ,J ' r---r,--i '• - ' ---- n.__‘-'7,„____ 1_ _I _ — — — — _ - - - _ - \ . 1 ':•.-7--- ,.• i 1 k.„..„..) 1 i z.--„ 1 I L --- --- \ __-------- - \ ,---- h. a e G o J -1 L I!I d1' I3 L w 3ON3aIS32I13dW3H IIli I si 5H 1 Hifi—MAP: I s ff 1 m sz LT a J —J zh I I Li r _'J ( i ! €g LJ 0 I I I r I 4_ _- --1- 4D a 1 I � I I s a® L_ 1J I L u! J Cv- —1--- r--- 1— --z !9 J- 7 r I �s! I I i 4ei1 1 1 1 gal II L J I 1 L r J 1 a •�' xis �'�$ °�. o s.3aaov I ._ 3, ��` g3I$ =I �$jE�' ' ' _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111DON�ais]� 1]dw9�s !IL, 93 o ouona srvoo 3Na 3sodoaa .: .., ___ „„, _______ , <i). .,.... .,..., ..,. ,,,__ ,r, J j _, I 7-11 r =L m 4 —r m1,,- J^ -e ,Y W E i i z 1 4r L I i '4-4 ------- — t ' I !ill' I 1 r, rr i _. a 01 411 aibil S530W I sIi 1-1-1-ii,,1 i0 LIT lig Iii"E 30N301S3113dW3H _ E W Iff N . i iiiiiii i. _ Bio nouonaisaoo uaN 0330.10213 Q lir e g S a I •e. Al% 1 HI IMMI•1!1 II I II I I II 1111!11_111 IIill I III 1 I IIIIIIIIIIIII I 11 1 II i 11 �,ll, IiiiIIIIIIIIIIlli I II I I I II 1 ' �,.� 11111: 11 I I IllIlIlIllIll 1ii 1 ii ii 1 II ii I I 'I�IpIII�I ',I • ii I I II �� 11 II I II 1 II II ii _ III NENE I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIil II ��I hi A2II�IIIIIIIIII ii II ii 'L�[ li II nmin.l..MUU II zI II II l E__i '' II L,',1 ) ii11iJI ji ,� 1 1 1 1 I II w 4 - g L;S�.��iii i a� II a 9la it;�:. � � G 3 s I II s P A I 4� I a 5- 1 2 1'2 S%g5 to a pa € 1 �� ..$ : 6, •- ..01 i �"' S�' s_r---1— w .�..�m 1 553i100tl I I ..-. m 2_2_22 _._ 222__2. - e„, _g 33N34IS3I 13dW3H 4), Yf �'i 555 g gl_ IgnAV JO Nou3na1S1400 w3N a3sodoad 11 .1 ig 1 liT g.gj wi k' , illk I I 1 II I II =P 1 II II y II /I . I, II li 1 I 1 11 'MIIIIi ii III I II, it ii II l 11 11 i i 1�� 1 ® 1 II iI IIIIII1111111L DI 1 l 11 ri1 1II DI I l l I i II g� i �i, 1 i II SII I I i II l„Hi. ii ll i ii ii I ii II 1 { I I I -I111[1[1r1 Ii. II �r llllllllllfl �':.r 1 II it III 1 11 it : i II i 1 I II \ ___ ii ii 9 i "_. � ii —4 — it 11111111131•11 ii . III 1111[111111 ilk II ___ i il II WEINI 'I II 11 III 11 II 1IE1= , it ii i i i MIMEii i 1, ii _—U I i IH'I Su i — u Iliii _1-1 I 1141 1011 �� Illllllllllllllll1 ii 1— I I )—LII o 1 � 6 I II ii J_II 1 1 II . : 11 H ; 1al iIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 it ii iS J1Hi I o as g€ 11111lll1111[1 ,I II i e 1, a §3 I aD i .,,.. .1,,I, .,,,. i.,„,,f !' $111 e e • • • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1.0 licale of / 4,,.,., /I „1M„uE..,9E,°,.a..,.TM.,.,w..a 5812 HIDDEN LANE , $ 1 e 4.' sxx/.aw.,.., M,.,.rv.a w...6.5,.a F.a9o.M I.1>9a.... EDINA,MINNESOTA e S fees where t..,for ingaDMIon / - 1, "' 1`,' m USURVEYservices NOTFSnshown 95,.99 Dec.x5,35=999 5,9,.....9.1 f — -- C(1.ORIGINAL OdUNARY.: ToNXILAPHIC SURVEY CONDUCTED D 8 Nfl • O6 36'11' '. w/ R" ° 1!:__----_7---7-- ;\ 1SUPPLIEDeY,HE .------- sr _ • ds ,,,,—•-•.--7 ,__- •--x —� _ RAIN �\1s F��' i w s M�x[I.uCOUNTY wwtSURVEYORS UNDERGROUND uTlunEs Bas ELECT,ETC. CONTACT: - t...___./._.i•39L4PE -�� -�R wra f4m I —� ---___ PROP. GARDEN NOT SHOWN OR LOWED. / r-------------- iSD �eILL CDSITLI� 0,'.4.,,,i,� =/'' ;,1 r Itl So[rAP➢SETaecK.' a �-- —BTS— L �'.<I GSI... 1 °' SITE PIAN NOTES \ _- / elu co10N HOMES 1• �.\n / : -�-e _ "— ALL TELE:MMNET S BLVD. _ .616_ OUSE PLANS PRW pep 0.V ELEVATION HOBO. WAYIATA MN 55391 j;� QO4" "fir ~ ® s�; PLANS/RAIN CAROMS BY SUNIX ENGINEERING. TELE95x MN 96 4 sp�i��_.11l"""/// (>P I r — I _\ ;. PRIOR HSTwucinax inn us o�nx oxsaevAuclEs sous ,1 �� 11/ = •4I 1 e'I // n. w AND WIPING OMEx �' j''s OR� / I , I\I ,f\, / "+d Z UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES COUNTY/CITY: I \ \ \ q fe rrz + I I n.s P. I THEUNO01GROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE K MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT TNE UNDERGROUND �CATED FROM <>' '' ,HE �. d\•, ill 1 uc uvnxcs�Tg iHOWxoA \ efiT \\�• �-i1 I Z AREA1 ABANDONED.DIE SURVEYOR FURTHER ,E EMU IN SERVICT WARRANT E LOCATION �O IJ IV TY 1"� ;;1 \>., ARE LOCTED E .N A 1', 'I 4 QINDICATED ALTHOUGH NE 1.13 cutylry THAT i u L, ;� �• • / i aal INFORMATION `` f II / UNAWARE MAr 6 N 5,D E`OMER STATE ONE GLL LOCATE TICKET o,wNk�W"E UTILITIES. 1` / / ; I oLmuunLT UTILITIES DID or PDN 1 II OME MAPS WERE •. , 1 1 s - f I 1 --- u••.mxwno ..'%i. ._.. I , I' n; ACCRA,sT®[ GPhSttOne Cali 1 a i I,uwlu,a rl pl `'•, a X; _LIS \ unlet �1 1 a 5, R wi1G116ISfuarlrll,I/i.4. p 0 �,• s1 I , .,' . \ , �i 0_, „ 101,-„11111! I, 11/.M1/Il y 1�.j✓, BENCHMARKS REVISIONS: x 1b� I N\i?:\�'v bQ aly wEpoxw/DRMATpx ssHpwxONTHE SURVEY BY ()::DATE REVISION ��Apy _ --4,-;,... I INITIAL ME PUN ( 4 /I _ I \t , 5,L I �.r,� ! I Mran INCuc of vxottRTv ELEVATION oT=x I `y\ I ( _.; it 4W' . 1 1i..-I(� TOP-'w I _yl,T RAID LOCATED AT SE CORNER 8 .78 I' m '� . l 7 ' ,i n )1%A'r 't:,. ''1 w 921.=9 MpxuMxFTnT UE PROPERTY CORNER ELEVATION. P. A. 'I I 1 �`+ y i °d,.-\I,°�� ry•� rlmnomul6- ELEVATONSBASEDONNAVDee. ' •t� Y FOUND el n` 1 1`_ 1, L .. ,I.iii Villi lil 1 y` S • 'CI 1 --- J I 1 COSTING AREA CERTIFICATE 4 I/ I \ I' •N/.' ' J °' i`•, i - ()TOTAL PARCEL AREA •z alssa FT. k 1� yy 9 : eg, _4' \ — — 7 r 3 I�� i nD -"-----i�i"_�. 'S DusE sp.FT. '"-'"..• -M..,,...,.. a „` PATIO RIVEWAY 1 �" �. •"'� ! - •Y / %% ;i 4 NJ 'r' 4 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS •5,692511,7 Oe1112N P. " j,,s ,1 i i I \ i - 't: -_ _ ,,-, I �.' i' '1 , pPER SURVEY Ft MPRADATED w=9n.. • 7 1+ --f�---"-- I, '1 4 '! ///�, ,I. I 'Ie 1'. GARAGE ' /' r�I^ 1 ; „-��a TPOROPOACD IIMPPERVIOo S AREAS • i •.1.' ` I o 1 I -ol // -� HOUSE 0.sa R. rr/ 'I I / .0,,,e;,..,,,-,' FRONT WALC/STOOP •513 SQ.FT. ,x.'/ ❑❑ L 1 cI .' rA=1'NGPRO "� ��r1 % w �'Us/sh TOTAL Saev SU PST 05 xT 2x ^PROJECT LOCATION'. .. 31/' , I 9 v•, ° d A . "ROP.0.p _�'rr.r'' 0�G 1 3 1 u •• • rr�r P .E vy U C' PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ntwl D 1 / 1� .r HIDDEN LANE a/1 1 6_.1 "-�- _ - `/ FLOOR • PID#2911721340025 .1 '.r.i. ,�i'r�rV../a(. • \ TOP UuuuenOUR .•909.79 L < .00dpP0 ..•.'-r 9D L,�K."n •• \\ ,..5,.E..>1,.Hxx,env6 �� j I n •nODDD 1 Y.eHPew Z:,; to. O uW l i 11 i Vu NOODO yr L ,--:•""'A A6P 44 j4tl24 Suite `1 J .0000; .i . 616 NA964..w.-CIS Pe.6s1.[ \/ .,e5a u. `1 0000 .„-,-.:•••• 1.54 ,N24' / 67sR s,w.. sl e.,N.,6su soex e.ne 651.275.8969 '.1 �� •000•� 1LH BRB�_ - 1 IXISTING SETBACK DETAIL: IA No TIL // ,_____4„1 �:� 275 8976 PALL FE3`GL ^ = 0 100 � � N OvO�`ROPO LEGEND =1"L_—_ — \\1i ,..._:_ _.,.rageir • SITE PLAN 0^ =i o'm =Fee X.w,. �w �M.,, SURVEY SElliutp/ toN/ROL PRACTICES 1.191.[RipL, ..9.M...A. ,... ..... ..._-- .., CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE nnimmni, or:. 4-4., ; :-"A%'°'-1,---”/- igOPEF, Ar4p4:4n4,744.2.„4,14.-:,.41,1i44,72F4:-.E7,: ,.:544,,:„Ay,i,-.:44, ,-L.........-_,..„-;---- ....16,041t., 1.404,40... 3 14. ,- -,.....77.,:-.: 4---v**,, -41F:41,77.4i7E1:15EFiiit;:i6E....7:::17.7?:F.4 1111PRIPIP .,-, ,r- --,- ...Z. ...:.%.,RE.ENIEZ7RantlE7g."34'5.22'Presi'asrenrscs71:." trre474.rsrie EiFo'Z's Et! '.4''.'.'' 401,ital04 VA M N 'It 7:',.°,707t.'7=1,,nroolz,k.:,7 r°.sr"-.'''''-"'"" ':,:to.t7.=van•ollr.n,zz,:t:t.T.,.=--------- '4",..?..,:r.,7,%:24-.2zotIgolovoorr„rx,'„';'.::ro.r.-=2-2.?:,, T— n7:1.227km E Ei 4k0t4760104, T.II Ms shos/-term activity m not complete (110.11.10141.14.01,55.197Os ' Pier:n'tl'e'ir.seitFIE::Eir"A"C°:•-•:F-$.35'r7a12/t7ra;7P:N;o:Ir::aiP7oiii".0 Lt:PIII.t5,p,74:17'.:Z:'''''..7.771:7L'..?:1:::.:.;77.:'77::''''.:11i::: mr..=.11.1. , ,,,,,,.. '''''.\140:1%.11' „ , „ ITSPI881-.9 TELEPHONE OISTIP.I.F. Inet.utilities. Tem...m.4,4cm 5812 HIDDEN LANE Meloll porem.tm '!hip.ii ::.7.1,.:2C7IV'sen:clerort'sn're.:W....dtte t=e%I'MT:=ot"'`°: ''',Z.:::i'::'''::::ET:Ziltl'i;%:',2:7":;":•1:71'f:V.:31.—:(:'4*''''''1'."::: -lite ilLgtsw . MItoll lawn ona Imcdscope. 'son611grr r=grwsCrP"OZ12.:74:L=TtgutUTTIorst'Zwran'Cd' 'Orit Aft‘Zs:V pp,,p ilf;,7.41,2,1 21:41 , Resler...lort.ore. EDINA, MN 'trfrO0r9=Vc7CoFnirapr-rg1,2'er"gj;atlottr<971:.'1%1I'nrn SILT FENCE INSTALLADON ly Remove oll Mfr.,..1.1 control clevIces. .NLIFIEPOPEPTIMO 9....ond PocIt itioi M.,:et.,ood R.In.f wars...OM el opm-sore m.o.mos. ' ''lLi . 811. , , . ,, • .71,,.., .7.=,1. =I.7.1.7t°'7:47:::',.::.:'!1=2 - 'o:'.: FEE.LI:i:Lic.:5i,;°lit'i'V'FL°:171,,It':i7-='1°41:-, I - ' 7-1)) 103 A I ' 921.25 i AIAL "M6:11tItITOVIL.015. Er:s)FriFlooZU,.:.FZi:Egair"rl'e:t,t:elinni:•:';:it=7::.qtit 7:::;:Efix M.......-.L.-...L.,rn....°...'''.‘'..'.....'....'..... 1 ) ' , ND IP 1 •,.. -' / 1 , .. i ' --- - ,,,,,..„::::„z:•:,,,,.;.,,,zz,,,,,t..,,,ty.av,2,-,,,va,...,7„,=,,.- -r.„,,,.0.,::•:,7:::5,:oii,7.1.,176:z.7.:„,..;:ii::„.i,F,:i.z.z,F.;.:;- , / , , \\ i ,, . 7:17-'"t"i:',1 .' ' ""A"A'°—A A'T''''' \ \\ nG°147C MERE \\ '''''''' k: r'' DATE REVISION ::74",°:,=',-"-=';ted`.A-'-•"AA"'A'A."A'A"- „r.,(5.'\*--,„k'A,,'•_,--._-:-- 'el - ,_-----,„ \,., .- 2/weld remosol ol Irom and L..msois.chem.poss. 5[11•11041...Pm In or. "'i"SFENZ:"1"."d'el"i"P'Z'Sio:Feli.nigd.ii:i7ortiF•os97111ICdi:P7EpieF' ''''.:7:'7'''''''''.'"E'57.E1''""r*I"":4J;7"I'''''';':='"'.72::n7""'" INEPEC110111 AMP IPAINTE.HCE: ' ;',Fi'LSoFloT:FiFolFietirit:141:::7'1:orS"'InEll'IL"F":"":%"::Itond:' \ ' oLms ' icL:";;:gpn:217:11EFERSIOYillalio71,°:::..7.-P:EFF.,75.7:i77°E,ii+E".1 1°2.:2,"triF„i,,cF:Ar.i;:,,t1;:-.;:ill,FiLiA,LIFIELA,'/,;;;41:':'042P 4 lilt „ /°' . - \ 5.Ps..ccsomolplre ss.nscl ammlle km behi.was.ond.1.1 contr...so Arnad If F V: .1 I.Y .,. .,.....awT 1111,,.......,. .1. • • .' •, • I, AA. .„ IrIIIW' IIII : \ \'. \ •".1 . . --.-PROPOSED MINOR FLOW INK.. ,,, ,\ . ,0 *-5, :4,,.• • A , \ p\ • (ft.z. „ - , / A F.E.FaAilAin2:7•:!ZEFE:A,T,A.'.iiE-12e2r1F,14..';A:Ei...1`1,:ai!',-7:7 \ $':',.•\ .., \, "f112,.....p.• . .4e,• )\I`3,, p...m , ''''c eA1:11.1-\,• ti, v.,4 / -- 1-Arlar"------414... t';\'''A .!'n'_!, "'" gikg4gg:7 'Z' ,n'.,& \,, a.v0 -;‘• ,- il ' ' — :.:Fizail'i,ERi:::::::::"Ai:,1'2:42TE:::::.:z"::::'7:'::•''''°:°7•*4.- Elto'd,EFTErir.gULraggr \ °, ''L'kt•\‘...,,, - _ ,H SlLT MK 41) ,P30 h4/.. ., C'' '1\\'.'s, ''-' / ''.''''l 41-01. ------ .,1...11\''''' i trim umemoa '.7.1:21:17====drelrernrgt.471t1TY47171=M"d IILL COSTELLO OPTS P.M R NO. nue 16,, \\, r,.\' '‘‘‘ fR:1/4__. 1,'''' lik-.1'1' • 1 .‘\ / PIFORHATIOM '/T.ETFIrehl:mr:oVorZa';F:::::clig:O1 tdri„Z"=m9./to"g4H/It'Z''97f2scd4Fai: ‘, ,'...1 'AML ..7_ 1,''-',',1 ''.-''-' 1 \ i. '1\ ' 1 ''...T'1 / EMAIL:BILLOELE.110.01.4.COM \ .',,,. , _.. 47 PROJECT.- 16-637 '''1114ETriain'tnsiEalr44.411:1'il'Fiers'5=ttlt==''''''''''''''' IMAMS 1101kne ' POLLUTION PREYLP1IOR MEATY/IPS: \ I as'Zge:l rronlwealers=erptProVIPSMRT Mtd I EmE,cEp. 99. ' t;i7L'ailtPTIF:eftrio:14145tr'''i:eZI:C.:t::="1'174t;'''-lf.r.'"474"'" APPROVE.. Ohm \ ''' aca ,ttypiDorr,41-%/•53''''' ' ----'i „.,,.,.4,,,,,:v„.,-....?,.,: ,•:,1"7"..;:grcgii:-.1 \ e, I . 6E::,.:.i....7.r.,°17.7.1V=r;.1%="1.117Z,=. ,.' •NM.solid.trash cool..end rem.d.mmcms.c.o..tr.hom I.mamlom PA' \ 0E9.1113. . 's:- T....S...e ,4010 'T ' PRIOR TO ANY 6 . HIDDEN LANE 1 GRADING, DRAINAGE, j ) .INLET ER SION CONTROL _ - K*z,..,,:•,,,,,,z.v.0:,,,K.,,,,k.,..,),,V,..."4'w- ... ---..--o, ° os _ ._ ________ -- AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN gittiY:iffittiFLIZSEI.itinIEF:"Ef4:Fir.ipi.:. SEOLLIENT . -. EROSION .7.... _--- SHEEP HO ' /. Er;17nr:il nse:tgiA4:F.:;i:Za,F„rriTit:rhSF.::::EltERE:, TYPICAL CROSS SECTION RAIN GARDEN .,‘.to to so ST1 ,.„ • • Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane, Edina MIST Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation • .w "}�' .. I ,4y k r I, .....d ' if , , -,,,,,, r, .t ft/Atilt Duudcc V V wcx 1. 4 , *$4„" ,_, A7,!f.,,!,1,--14° '§ti $ ' r�}.,fie' .. _) tigilre ::1-1% i fl't.11)1 t•Ft°t"rld i' ff€@A1G FU iId4`Mt t.Aiyl� s f- e � a massing study figure 2-0 (contextual elevations/ with adjacent structures) Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane, Edina 1V11' Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation 4 . } M r 4--- i 04N '''''- , R _ �• . ;:. .- , 1 , i— — I t_ i ,,,,'- : i 1 1 . ' .' 4 e-E> ,.a„. .,..4Ya r Vi A,..".".. r+? apt 41* AdiailaffillaNialkant4_ figura'2-1 (existing structure at 3821 Northwood Drive) F _ • i i v "r • • , syr s J ,J 'tet t 5 k*,,,?''''''-fE".1.' It - I .\\}•.,..4,- w'. , a„.. _ .. 6 Ili r t -'u: , n.a,,, figure 2-2 (existing structure at 5808 Hidden Lane MIN=1=710 0 Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation 1 / 3111_ I'' ~" I NM ti 0 ii 5821 Northwood Drive(existing structure,built ca.2013) Proposed Side Elevation for 5812 Hidden Lane • figure 2-3(contextual elevation/marring study with adjacent structure) lIItH I I Y 1 Iii jilg__ :1: 6 Proposed Front Elevation for 5812 Hidden Lane 5808 Hidden Lan(existing structure,built ca.1953 with recent renovations) figure 24(contextual elevation/massing study with adjacent stnrctuie) • • m� — 0 ' 1 t1 f 1 ri w t--'I ON F I\ar, I-- a° `{.. +s n. Eft 44 nd J G.-1 J Q a0 J z0 6�g Ot69 V N33 FLL210N Lt9gJ �� 0 P:4µ,l F. r M �'oQWmV11111* *XXX ,,Cn�'pa L`1• rc _.� 2 g '` S J r. :51`65 t w N ,v i o= f Z U en a O X ry �� /" 2 O LL \\ W ~ gip, 1,, s m \, / /FJ'"62915 r °: m f+ ® g I. Nei 41.1.":44.- --------_,,,___ng a m \ Zz 7-1 iY //�` ��` 5 J't\uN.'S4' W<j J m 1 _ "+ tO iw /%:��� / pop- °? m ,,1/r 1i°iN/siei/ie/ie'lNie'-,°• w 1 C X 1 #1:7440,3;55101 Ne 4,7,,§N°,N1„°§e %/i1i•:22s S 2 o r m4 / 4 m 4 r t,' e/1 S,ee/N i,3;5 101 y°i°y� r o° .�” ♦1e N11,°1e,NiNlvel/e,ie-NiN°i°ci+/6ir.,, H lJ / & X n ,N,N e.N.4,:°ci:ccii.:°�N/is°(4d r. 'J t X � _/ � � m iiia� 'LiS°�i,/s/°i S°°i jr' a W \ G1 / n :,..i m y i -4 ., //e,/ •'obi° ,/i,N o�_ 6 a > m 4". Iona 1 i�* sad O V m m +�"s1 0* �/e§5 ON110319-M �e i % r �1lr m X ryry y S(1. r1,I15 9/po�Ii. ‘s..2.6 .\ u a11C ry //�//IseJl:i°�°�feel°°, fl%/I/°Is7 P �j1I°°/ 8 OF d C- rc X 1,I N,ryya'!III,//,IIIs4 j1N j% �+ 4'' -/ E: O A at i g 1,1,:',.,,41/ R.°,///..:1,N 1 j�i�i/,//,y�iiii/'i�e�i.,��° /�31y1�1i ,%N/i��i.: f5' wm. �n C X m tet,a N1 '4,21.,5,..4)1.12;",; eN Ni_�Ny/1/1; '6 r O /i,��[`3o N �N�I L.° N iN iie Nr�P°�1/, 29 �< lit FI w I C ,i I+N°,I e♦ I /„e.°j7e1,j1 • 1•L 0 j ;,N! _g /,/,i11°el�.I-�/.h • w S9 ".gbft a I � � //N,11I/1 �I,I1,0 �I/10/101,4',410/41/1,1,e1111�1/I/�1°�'I O c•!, r r 2 m ZS fr �g 1 N tour'Iej1°I1I1 °,,II,�%!�'I�C`%11j1IN1/1 Ji�,jj17,1!% �Z �•�N• N \ 410 � _ - .o m � �3�� i////i°�!�i//,°�i1i i°i1c ,y°{1,//,1/,51/N1N1N%i,1 iiy s N ,� n m i/°/.1 NN// /1�i/1. 1 i ,i1//,y/cay/01y//,Se I,4 y X Og °41 ♦ 1/• ,N, 11I1 ie/1 I, 2�'5 F, �, m' p 09 Oq1,t %eN1,/�§ '°,1i 1/N1/N1,fil -✓� ' \1S m w � am S // 41•I•II,, ,, I1 s1 N1• 1� .- X d-- W a /10O �9 A �.0//41 x,111,4°�°,1,,//N1 i ; t� ®...t MO N, �N 1 i Qb.O4dd/- Y 1H/� sri7s _. 4e40'"///:'ti- , , `,,m m J` o X z Q 6� ctt�obt43I�3' +' 24� �� �i 1 t ti ��O 44/ --1�qo [ °Sc \ � � a z� = o e bf ,f.'..,..? k�0 S 3��N/ o�2ga N ��? $7$ 1 m a m 4 9p 4.4,e £1Z S o x t. ors _.,\ n �s �S rocsi z� a 6 m 4 t .:-i.:`.'i•a;• .fa �9c,' ` i 3� w bM MO z to, �y. ','..,•".;':'•p, jt 3( ONkI n .. :V7!t"t n�\:•i •g. t, : ��p x'1`00 0 w`::'`' 'um s 'V at, V zzs I ry r m '.'o '•, .. \ SwW. _ z p• K 9� • y �>: ` a �W ‘,0,7 m 3 a O S sX C °•A I..„.• . , I fig.Ett . s �4' :9,, > m 9zt .. .: :w m i st 046 O 1. 618 t. A4. .`r .4 . p / L X` • Xt. .� No 2I A 9• • p • IIMIM191FMIMMMMMMIMMMMMMIMMMMMMMIMMMMIMMM -7..ja V SITE ADDRESS: 5213 DUNDEE RD. EDINA, MN AS—BUILT TOP OF POURED WALL TC HOMEBUILDERS INC. **PROPOSED TOP OF POURED WALL ELEVATION or(923.41) AS-BUILT ELEVATION 09-09-2013 m RIO> Legend -BM-- Fonnoe 5ewero Silt Fence for 6m n Control . . . D `v� IIIIS �0 Water 'A/// • #1 ., 10 CNWOOD O Manhole i///LliZei #1%/,i ,Zr yz� EDGE as BxUvwovs ____,\:.......,..r,,,,,, a�.v r, Light 1,111 O Power Pale CrateSen Valve �6Ji h2 e v I El cele vale /n •m SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET Dea�tldoaa Tree a�-o � / me --- r I Coniferous Tree ///' ‘Z%J yY ' x - Cana ala cam x900.0 ExiTop Devotion / elite axx a. x9000TC Top 91 Curb Elevotion !�/�/ `/ ,$' x900.003 Top of Roll Devotion ✓ / „OT woo/ 'y',p .900.0BW Bottom of Wall Elevation s /// - OCT /� Y '0 moi^ x(900.0) Proposed Elevation / TOP NUT•922.48 vrv.vx xb V' r,e A' J�N9Wex \\ '9, O+ ® Aa O,i t Dev01 an �/O wow S A.Y;° zr e. \\ i-DM-- Existing Contour y„� ° /((�`�x)z5'elxcx \ �PBUCF Orv'na9e v rH .v \} rp �/,P7/'-� Coniferous tree m be Removed ` /' /106.j/2T /� E'n ^•net. 9je eDm 3• 1p° 1ei (\ a V • cn�remaa rte°m be Removed vru. a a.r /a / \ ova x I.na•.nen y/ o • s Iron Monument Found /fG" /y:9:? /8 n Ab6"\\ to no.reer•Veer **Tn;e propoaea eite pion la Eane In o corEarrre O Dvn Ead°a%t.15230. ,,,e p..:Yi area l ,4 vj 3 8 103/N \;p5 w11M1 Nnncaela Statute 326.02 Sued.c4, Inxcn F.L.S.15230. .... "'"_L Y Iran , iJ sten / 129 8 \\ T T3 �°y,T� \ PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Lot 9 Dlock 4,MRROR TAKES IN EDINA, ere.z (•e Ev / i 12) 8 ' 10) /:.,.. x \\ Hennean caunry M nnesota / 26 /vx.z. `. '4' ....:' 811 25 6.: a / ,e .ers. \exr.e� '8 8 \e % �24• / R-D- 0,.. 6 / �,• NOTE; Na Seared 1'la°Made For Any Easements -(vara rr_ 123 1094 11 re h? 'V�, v,e.e. .ens I en„ / EXISTING ELEVATIONS: erax. nx. azz' dam` '"+°' PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: t yv sa,z. Fast FIRST FLOOR.923.5 4 I 121�J . 8!} 130 /°3 �.\ P�v+e.s 0200 0FFLOORLF (9(430) GARAGE FLOOR i-921.99 °t1'v' y '°' TOP OF ORWALL-) 'fA r�0070 ldd�,12F2 11] 112,,,, 11 z3 a cation atil a anawn 0 e OF POURED (920.41)e] s ROOF PEAK-936.9 979 raSAAyF xUe/ 116 8 a '0 e,c4--�: NOTE: In.° I NO 1I ine or from Plan 1 8 ,Po°j'J'f3 r. furnished by De utilitycomNanleand are notified SPORT CO RT FLOOR O(913.35) nx,. / e In, /\ 1,fished e. Utility companies any SPORT COURT -(906.03) .mx.o x II 1 /1 ,,413(t�+?�.\ R Li ezr°' for exact location before doing x ovalian.1ed ©x119 /I Y y'fq4%y�: q' OaB� e V\ r115 .'v/' T� 96 to Ty Ov,ra. .e e,ax aa^'_,.v ^=\//7i-Y,99,, M1 arae r G w mee o under Inds 0 survey.Plan,o reportIAlas duly registered by • I. , h�ryl r under my direct s Dem AlenS Dot I a 10.re9islered �� 56h Oy' \ J 1 ,Land 5 ayD antler In n a the State OI Mlnnozot0. PROPOSED AC AREA 5UMMNM EXISTING ARU SUMMRHY O �n PROPERTY w 25,009 SF PROPERTY-25.509 SF K a,a.t vzur +,.\ W.BROWN LOGO SURVEYING,INC. HOUSE I v 3,819,2 SF EXISTING HOUSE-3,151.5 SF �eNy. \\ REAR 1O 5 -3 SCREENED B 1 340 SF SHED h SCREENED PATIO 340 SF C` �. �� FAR PATO-OVER 4 SF IAMB SO Si ALLOWANCE-170.0 SF BRICK PATIO 023 SF owe. lit FRONT WUSH WLR E'WIDE 9 62.9 SF IMPERNOU9 SURFACE /\ 69 F?;3°'LI• IMPERVIOUS SURFACE•4.19).1 //1-J Woodrow A.Brown,R.L.S. MN REG 15230 16.35 0 o'tl \ I NOD 09-09-2013 a 117.at.,+•,02/, J \ Aar wA v.ra c21.3 pu014FE F0100o_n_,o o*oo'r OH (23063 ports 3 xSWerc eWn aF at'• `� //Bx W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. \ / 0030 Cedar Avenue So.,scale 220. Bloomington,MN 55425 yp i'� Boy(052)854-4055 ox:(952)654-4266 �/� 17nMDere: 09-09-2013 20 \ 208-13 SOAR:1 Inch-20 Feet 1 on 1 208-13 REF: 157-13SP 133/11 t� ?� I & w v-,6 -" .aye ••-v •CyV- DATE: August 8, 2016 TO: Cary Teague— Planning Director CC: David Fisher— Building Official • Ross Bintner P.E. - Environmental Engineer FROM: Charles Gerk EIT— Engineering Technician RE: 5812 Hidden Lane -Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Plan dated 6/24/16. Summary of Review The proposed plans include the demolition of an existing home, lot grading and construction of a new home at 5812 Hidden Lane. Engineering has no concerns with the plans as proposed, other than those detailed below. Grading and Drainage ilk Drainage on site is controlled using swales and rain gardens. The rain gardens promote infiltration and water quality and are a requirement of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The raingardens have emergency overflows that flow to Dundee Road and Hidden Way, away from other private properties. Erosion and Sediment Control No Comments Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required prior to construction of the driveway. Water and Sanitary Utilities No Comments Other Items Nine Mile Creek Watershed district permit must be issued prior to issuance of building permit. I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 A ? - 1 elevation A division of Streeter&Associates HEMPEL RESIDENCE — 5812 HIDDEN LANE VARIANCE NARRATIVE July 25, 2016 On behalf of our clients, Jon and Heidi Hempel, we are requesting a variance from the setback ordinance on the Dundee Road side of their property. Our intention is to remove the existing structure currently residing on their lot and build a new structure that utilizes the same setback on Dundee Road as the existing structure. By granting a setback variance, our clients will have the opportunity to utilize the property in the same way they do now and still be well under the average corner street setbacks of adjacent properties. By way of background, Jon and Heidi purchased the lot located at 5812 Hidden Lane in February of 2012. They purchased this property with the hope of significantly remodeling the existing structure. They engaged Murphy and Co. Design in March of 2012 to begin the work of designing the remodeling project. After the design work was complete, the project was sent out for estimating. The remodeling costs were so significant that Jon and Heidi made the decision to demolish the existing house and build a new home in its place that better suited their intended lifestyle. Murphy and Co. Design then began designing a new home in the current home's location. Not long after the new home was designed and bid out, Jon was confronted with a health challenge that effectively put their project on hold for over a year. When Jon and Heidi regrouped this past Spring, they engaged Murphy and Co. Design along with Elevation Homes, to simplify the previous design. It's important to note that with Jon's current health condition, the living spaces on the home are focused on one level. And with the current setbacks and program needs to the home, there are challenges making the property work given the new setback along Dundee. Similar to the existing house, the new house design calls for an "L" shaped, single story structure that makes the most of its beautiful setting and preserves a number of mature trees on the lot. The most significant tree is a 36" diameter Maple tree in the back yard. The house is designed to give ample clearance for the continued sustainability of that Maple tree as well as to provide recreational space in the back yard for their children. In a preliminary review of the project with City staff, it was discovered that the proposed location of the new house did not conform to the setback being enforced on the Dundee Road side of the property. The home was designed utilizing the current home's setback of 37.8'. However, it was brought to our attention that the enforced setback is based on the setback established by their neighbor to the north (5821 Northwood). That setback from Dundee is 51.4'. The 51.4' setback at 5821 Northwood is due in large part to the unique shape of that lot (it is a pie piece shaped lot that has a significant radius along Dundee). The other corner lots in the immediate neighborhood (please see attachments) are more rectangular shaped and have structures that are parallel to the east/west oriented street they face. In the case of 5821 Northwood, the street (Northwood) curves dramatically and turns 90 degrees to turn into Dundee Road. The house that occupies 5821 Northwood is oriented to that dramatic curve. It is effectively rotated 45 degrees in comparison to the other properties in the area (corner and non-corner lots). It is an anomaly in the neighborhood and directly impacts the setback for the subject property. By comparison, 5821 Northwood's 51.4' setback is over 30' further than the side street setbacks of the other corner properties in the immediate neighborhood, which have an average setback of approximately 20'. Under the ordinance, the subject property would be required to have a 51.4' setback, which would take away over a third of the property to develop, while a 20' setback would take away only 17% of the property. Given the information above, it's clear that the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. In contrary, it will make it be more conforming with the other corner properties. In addition, this circumstance is directly a result of the neighbor's setback at 5821 Northwood (who has signed a petition to support the variance request, along with many other neighbors). Finally, the subject property cannot be put to a reasonable use for the client given the current health and program needs of the family, in light of the egregious setback along Dundee. It is our contention that our client should be able to maintain their current setback from Dundee and not have that setback derived from a neighboring property that is an anomaly in the neighborhood due to the adjacent street's orientation. We do not believe approval of this variance sets a difficult precedent as the proposed setback already greatly exceeds the neighborhood average. Thank you for your consideration. July 25, 2016 Subject: Variance application 5812 Hidden Lane Edina Planning Commission: By signing this petition, I am expressing my support for Jon & Heidi Hempel as they apply for a variance with the city of Edina. I understand that the variance will allow them to build their new home in place of the existing structure residing on their lot at 5812 Hidden Lane. The new structure will utilize the same setback to which the existing structure conforms. I do not see that this will cause any detriment to the neighborhood in any way. 1. 1 , /Uele___� -51ot Low.. 2. DCUUL lilkf)re a I k-hddlAA La-ka 3. C C L'S___L_4i,w 0 STO c- 14;4-1 - f--.1,. LA-1,k_ 4. kl .--kit kJ c k.- Lo.-u.e. 5. 2A , L ' • mal Z4 � . ._. (- - 4, or... .,, e i r" 4 (490C4 i4e, 7. ifT1 4 %% ii ..f a. / j. .- 1 -I 8. 1 9. 16"-‘14/17uci A- 6E* 53© ? .c4 ,. � , .c_ eec. 10. 11. di7.7724 dr/ .�J d CL L Q N di July 25, 2016 Subject: Variance application 5812 Hidden Lane Edina Planning Commission: By signing this petition, I am expressing my support for Jon & Heidi Hempel as they apply for a variance with the city of Edina. I understand that the variance will allow them to build their new home in place of the existing structure residing on their lot at 5812 Hidden Lane. The new structure will utilize the same setback to which the existing structure conforms. I do not see that this will cause any detriment to the neighborhood in any way. 1. CJirpq L71de1 tart �'V SAN 2. if I. 5-WV Pot,th mzei 3. W,/ ti . dip uUYe� 4. —� 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation "'nom IL * a;lr. `a 1I., %_` _ _',' 111111.0:„%_ 9 _ ..524' IL' . ' . ',elk .561.,t, " .. 10 1 ,ior \IFi R . .'fi fiviirl1.2 « x1 Mi= R f y +fib. , t. ��. "r. ." a 1 + ST. r r ..4. `. I I 1 figure 1 , a'1 r ti4 a s .. figure 1-0 Mirror Lakes Subdivision Additional corner lots;like in kind to subject parcel Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation Fil Hennepin County Property Map Date 7/20/2016 4,744; Sy < " ;,r ^ 'I --., '4,,4, ori,,,.. ' MI, • �'. V 1 t ft,1 ,, it , ‘4 �!} fr* } '" ,4 . 1 ji 1 inch=50 feet figure 1-1 5801 Northwood Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lake Drive) 14'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to Northwood Drive) 55'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ' '" Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/20/2016 'y Y ,p 4' r ,�w — , ,- , 4 . IP ,4,,, ,.3?e, ,. -if s ` *.`' ail ter..._ 4 . P,0' • 58`4 .. • Ort # ;>,. +_ . . O tp las .1' 4. it T1s 1 inch =50 feet figure 1-2 5800 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lake Drive) 20'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) 65'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation fil Hennepin County Property Map Date 7/20/2016 ,,•,,, % 41114''" 111 I .. , 04, ." ok 01111.1111001/4e0.111.1111° \ P 74si ' , . • fi , re :1-.."::::, 4 A .0 mai .lot , ,... . #,.... ' .. . k , . . , . . :FLitL 4 * .. ' . g7,1r1r, asi 1 inch =50 feet figure 1-3 5813 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Dundee Road) 20'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) 78'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation "" ` ' Hennepin County Property Map Date 7/20/2016 "441* a44 ' 0 A '' _ „ , f ,m r 1 ' g # 4 i 4s ik it 1 t ,. k. , 1.. in 41Pe. t lif: t , ,. . ' tt. 4 4, - FA, 4 ,. ,it.s.„. . ,.. .v. .,.. .„ ,... . . , is , ' ,:oAt.'I 11 iti 1 inch =50 feet figure 1-4 5801 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lakes Drive) 24'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to Hidden Lane) 55'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation ' `."'" Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/20/2016 Atilt • • 4� 5a1I ■ Y � u .01 1 inch = 50 feet figure 1-5 5808 South Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Dundee Road) 27'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to South Drive) 75'-0" +/- Hempel Residence 5812 Hidden Lane,Edina MN Variance Submission—City of Edina Supporting Documentation Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/20/2016 � � ^..... may+. •. yt"` as'n18�?W>✓. ' ett 004 411 33 • gra 1 inch=50 feet figure 1-6 5800 South Drive,Edina MN Approximate side yard setback(to Mirror Lakes Drive) 14'-0" +/- Approximate front yard setback(to South Drive) 70'-0" +/- 'EI �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT •tNc��iaoe�£9. Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Kris Aaker August 24, 2016 B-16-14 Assistant Planner Recommended Action: Approve the 5.35 foot front yard setback variance as requested for property located at 6511 Ridgeview Circle, for owners Byron and Laura Olson. Project Description The request is for a 5.35 foot front yard setback variance to add a front entry and powder room addition to the subject home located at the end of Ridgeview Circle cul-de-sac. The project includes an addition to the powder room/bathroom area next to a proposed enlarged front entry extension. A porch less than 80 square feet into the front yard setback, (complies), is also part of the plan. The owners are requesting a variance to allow a small extension to the interior front entry way that would allow a larger transition space between the front door and the stair case to the 2nd floor. Currently there is approximately 3 feet between the front door and the stair case. Guests arriving through the front door have no transition spot and have to move down a hall in order to shut the front door. The plan also includes adding a shower to the powder room to convert the small bathroom space to a 3/4 bath on the main floor. The new front entry would extend beyond the existing front building wall by 5.5 feet deep x 15 feet wide. The project is an addition to an existing nonconforming house. The front yard setback requirement is the average front yard setback of the homes on either side of the subject property. The average front yard setback between the two homes is 36.55 feet. The existing front yard setback of the subject home is 33.8 feet or 2.75 feet within the required setback. Any improvement to the front facade could not maintain the average front yard setback of the homes on either side. All of the improvements will match and enhance the existing home. The small addition to the front of the home and the new front porch breaks up the building mass and adds interest to the front of the building. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND • The subject property is located on the end of Ridgeview cul-de-sac. The lot is 16,776 square feet in area. The owner is proposing a small addition to the front of the house to include a porch. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single dwelling units, zoned R-1, single dwelling unit district and guided residential. Easterly/Westerly: Single dwelling units, zoned R-1, single dwelling unit district and guided residential. Southerly: Single dwelling units, zoned R-1, single dwelling unit district and guided residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is a 16,776 square foot lot with a two story home with an attached garage built in 1967. Planning Guide Plan designation: Single Dwelling Unit Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Building Design The finish on the home will match the existing exterior finishes. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed Front- 36.55 feet *31.2 feet Side- 10 16.1/33.8 feet Rear- 25 feet 27.1 feet Building Height 2 1/2 stories 2 story, 30 feet to the ridge, 25 feet Lot coverage 25% 13.7% * Variance Required Primary Issue: ® Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons: 2 s 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit Zoning District and complies with all requirements with the exception of setback from Ridgeview. 2. The additions are appropriate in size and scale for the lot. The improvement will enhance the property and not detract from the neighborhood. 3. The improvements will provide a reasonable use of an existing nonconforming house. The variance is being requested to allow appropriate front entry space. The addition and new front porch will break up the front building mass and add interest to the façade. 4. The extension is a minor intrusion into the front yard area. • Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Section 850.0.Subd., requires the following findings for approval of a variance: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variance is reasonable and very minor. The addition corrects a design flaw that is difficult to address without a variance. 3 e ANIL 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self created? Yes. The unique circumstances are that the existing home is at a nonconforming front yard setback and the existing front entry space is extremely shallow in front of the staircase. The addition will add practical floor space in an area that cannot be added to without a variance and will add both interest and depth to the front façade. The variance is a point intrusion of a 5.5 feet by 15 feet, (83 square foot addition). All other portions of the plan, (front porch), conforms to the ordinance requirements. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed addition will not change the streetscape along Ridgeview cul-de-sac. The character of the neighborhood consists of a variety of housing styles. The small addition and porch will break up the massing of the front façade and will add character to the structure and compliment the neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variance based on the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a) The practical difficult is caused by the location of the homes to the north and south, (already farther back from the front lot lines than the subject home). b) The encroachment into the setback will not affect neighboring properties or the street scape. The improvement is a minimal point intrusion into the setback. c) The request is reasonable given the location of the existing home and the desire to add to a small entry. The addition will break up the massing of front façade of the home. Approval of the variance is subject to the following condition: 1. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped July 18, 2016. Deadline for a City decision: September 16, 2016. 4 r The Proposed Variance will: Yes No Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. The current setback ordinance requires 35 feet from the curb to the / living space. We currently meet that requirement and would like extend 5 feet, reducing the number of feet from the curb to the living space to 30 feet. This distance will allow the front door to be moved away from the bottom of the stairs in the entryway. Currently, when the front door is opened it comes within 6 inches of the first stair of the stairway going upstairs. This creates a bottleneck when the front door is opened and people enter the house. With this remodel we will be"fixing"an original design issue and creating improved space to meet guests Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district As stated above,the interference between the front door and the lig bottom of the stairs in the entry way does not exist in other houses in the vicinity. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance We will extend 5 additional feet towards the street, which is the L�r distance that newer neighborhoods are allowed. Also we will be keeping the siding and brick consistent across the house, and adding a handrail for the front steps for safety purposes. Not alter essential Character of a neighborhood The appearance of the property will be improved with a new porch 1//and entrance which not detract, but improve the character of this property and help keep our neighborhood to Edina's high standards. Additionally, although our setback will be 5ft closer than our bordering neighbors,we live on a circle with line of sight not being a factor. ennepin CDate: 8/16/2016 ounty rorty Map . • n. -'�' �• ', *•f -.....f".??-..--'. a , tg � : 9r e ._ . =te�i 't , aG rr + "i s -,t: .44-1;:, ',-.: ra asY € #i#� , 4, ' ; *L- " ,',';;;..,:::::::.,' ,'''''*,1'1;:i.,—,,,\:\1* '''''''' ''''''',..1;,*'' ",,,,,k r, , ,-,,,:'S r„:',. ' .`:;,' th4,-,.,.:!i''.,„,:\, ,. aF-4'4,4'4)4' � "*"77,7*--:* ..r;i,row' ��r moi'• �' � ��'� .;,;..)k:x r. 3 .d y . . ` iA-- - .' / s `w 7 , • t .�� ,' i„ ' , f�,'a� -� . 310 .�f i ‘, 17" '.,U':: FS,21, A,_f„: „,,,,,, : „,....--,. . sr Ems., �x� }. 4-t, ... # „:„., .„,—..„,„,.. 1 inch = 50 feet PARCEL ID. ' Comments: OWNER NAME PARCEL ADDRESS: 6511 Ridgeview Cir, Edina MN 55439 PARCEL AREA: 0.38 acres, 16,676 sq ft SALE PRICE: SALE DATA: SALE CODE: This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or ASSESSED 2015, PAYABLE. AYABLE 2016 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable PROPERTY T. Residential for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD: Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. MARKET VALUE: TAX TOTAL: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: LEG 'P1PTION: Lot 1 1,Edina Valley Estates 3rd Addition,Flennepin County,Minnesota SCOPE OF WORK&LIMITATIONS: N 88'59'00"W I " 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. _ _ MONO IRON �� 36.55 ---..The scope of our services does not include determining what you own,which is a legal /matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent / m m legal counsel,if necessary,to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, S/— fi \I such as easements,that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. - / 2. Showing the location of observed misting improvements we deem necessary for the / survey. / 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the comers of / the property. / 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. / 5. Showing and tabulating building coverage of the lot for your review and for the review / of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to / '.. verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. . 6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the / topography of the site.We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining A' elevations for construction on this site.The elevations shown relate only to the a, a/ benchmark provided on this survey.Use that benchmark and check at least one other • A' �4b JT/ feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations far use on this site or 8 / before beginning construction. EXISTING DWELLING r? / 7. While we show proposed improvements to your property,we are not as familiar with = your plans as you am,nor em we as familiar with the requirements of governmental 616.10 / / agencies as their employees are. We suggest that you review the survey to verify that / ^ 1 I the proposed improvements we show am what you intend to build and submit the survey / i to such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over your project.You should / 1 L n i e their approval,if you can,before beginning construction or planningimprovements / x ens gain PP Y BI B / 4 to to the property. / ^ 4 max / uN 1 STANDARD SYMBOLS&CONVENTIONS: it / "e"Denotes iron survey marker,set,unless otherwise noted. d '•/x 6769 M1 / 74j 4 �' m 4., , / 2 1]1 ---L ..»y / °< belt 4' \ 67 f / ° B to %o ,ry s bow ». a t/ 4o 47 4'' -t,- i y 64' a ''',41'•ail.. P t.T >O '4 RIDCEIIEIT e„,,a O' s CIRCLE X6]69 IXa]6a NANHIXE en6 \ e6 rWHO NON : X67 i „ 101.37 8 j 1 i S 84'28'55"E 1 2 EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE PROPOSED BU[LOING COVERAGE Ig HOUSE 1,982 S0.FT. HOUSE 1,982 S0.FT. / DECK 945 50.FT. DECK 945 SO.FT. DECK CREDIT 150 S0.FT. PROPOSED ADDITION 75 SO.FT. /`•, PROPOSED STOOP 50 SO.FT. / TOTAL BUILDING AREA 2,177 SO.FT. DECK/PORCH CREDIT 150 S0.FT. • AREA OF LOT 16,776 S0.FT. TOTAL BVILOING AREA 2,302 as.FT. BUILDING COVERAGE 13.0% AREA OF LOT le,778 30.FT. ... 2O BUILDING COVERAGE 13.7% F ,�2v DATE REMSICN DESCRIPnON DWG ORIENTATION SCALE CLIENT/JOS ADDRESS / W55055 BY YE1�uxm uvgxrn s°OM9]aI GATE SURVEYED: SHEETTRLE SHEET NO. 9/7/16 TO SHOW PROPOSED IMPRO ENENTS Advance BRAD&LAURIE CIRCLE 'r°°".""71 ---tOw MAY 31,2018 PROPOSED Surveying&Engineering Ca N 6511 RIDGEVIEW — W.„,.w.»•Wr DATE DRAFTED: DRAWING NUMBER EDINA,MN :�w• ": ::s1 3503a I.I95.xan,,issll 6 JJuon 1,2016 JUNE'',2016 160387WPOntE snE:T+oG+ r • ' 550-91 <311� 910UU9 31VO w a^t ...LA WM I N Iff,...,02 I:IW,/,do�% I i ` dI a' a 11 ._ i I1 - E;,-,- _�- 11 a t i 7,, 0_ u W t 1 1 11111 11111 - ,79W y 9 Iskilt1 fYl III �I i Q � 011 1111 iI o �'o —1 ❑ f 1 I IDI I 1=- 0 �i II Q 41r-II-F-1 � r� � � Di a l�n1n11 1J11 WI } Q i O 111111 .,,.- J VILIJ � % 4 oz �. o ; o X — II e E w u- w pa i I iOL i' Ir 0 " m { iia i 0 2 X W N Wise fQo8a gl 11$ w/°1 ilii ¢Wad ..IC SNOISIA 6 IKITCHENI $ I � - - e ss @ ': m 1-F o aTrl l� ' S'-II' Y _A RE-FINSH WOOD STAIRS I/I \ off I% 'GARAGE! la IDENI ",1C 4'-10' it 1S1 ® F I GI -8'OF 6'POURED CCNG IF To xrriw. Fc> +,�6, A uraxD. C I •40'O 8'POURED CONC. I _ C . J� -16'x8 FTG. R g�f� ___I. 'I ? CCC laILEI _ m w-, r --, I C pCp d�•,'•,`'1 _iI——NEW RAILING.WROUGHT IRON I I I ® I I 1 i/ wN100D NEWEL PO515 I I •40%OR B'P.C. I 0 M ■_L•Ib'S'FTG. I I 0....., , -4;_- ` ee 1 11 r�Si' IBATNI$ — IENTRTI , --Ts 5._,,. 15'-0' vL \ K /Q� •• 0* I96 DH DOOP u2OLT. r. FOUNDATION PLAN I/4'•1'-0' NEW CLI.WALK ''9' b'- III� �CAVRD.STOOPI III1 4=Z, flP,ES _ xQ ROLF 6'-10' ER DBL.808 CEDAR POSTS 10'-0' w/BRICK VENEER BASE S'-2• - _ - IS'-e' 10_4. 'MAIN LEVEL PLANT v4'.I'-e• / — PROPSED NEW LAYOUT .m.. 1—, ,S , ,I—, 15 ADDED BaFT. I-I, ,-I, ,IL— , BL 1 = ;U2LATI2 ' ..1irta_. egg'.NI 0 I -Fil — I III I�� a t ISI i 1 =l�I MI F raa saa arm _ _ ra wnaer vrr 0 3IIt -moo. _iiIi _ 1 MJ0ATON15T8 TO EXISTING 9 9 FRONT ELEVATION I/4'.1'-0' m a m I.NEW SHUTTERS ADDED TO 2ND FLOOR WINDOWS NIR'CCNC' •_ 2.MATCH EXISTING BRICK VENEER AND SIDING. 6 MIL POLYM. L Mil „ ILL AS RO'DI16•IXi I,1E X I�\p/ �\1 EXISTING STUD WALLS• PLAN NOTE, XX EX STING STRICTURE 4 CONDITIONS WERE .'�� NEW STUD WALLS INTERPRETED FROM FIELD MEASUREMENTS1CROSS SECTION''/4'•1'-e' ANP F OTOGRAPHS OBTAINEP BY OTHERS. Mkk\N•kN`\\\I EXISTMG FOUNDATION WALLS 'yD j$�� ACTUAL STRUCTURE/CONDITIONS MAY VARY V pd Mal THAT fiFIWN GENERAL CONTRACTOR I///// 1 �FOUNDATION WALLS I BUILT BY, R MOD)=!_/ADDITION PLAN iET SRTING C'BLE foR VERIFYIUYa ACTUAL /1 I MULBERRY BUILDERS S EXISTING CONDITIONS. 1 OLSON RESIDENCE In yOFI LL� I M. 550-91 AlW 9I0UIVL MVO WN lPRliRiIl ill iiIhi 7 w ,�� 1111111111111111111111111111 -I Hall Ilillmuluamull d 0 cL I- I z I Ill L . q ja IIIIIIIEIIII 4s111Z 1111111111111111111111 !141411111, I U Ye AY a ) I ii i l lL'ka a II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 14tiiif 2111111111111111111imiR �illyE0111111111111[ ] �o - t ti fe MUM ileV0 IIf e3 itaiI1.11 :i le I I iip, II I) 1 a mii � I I I I I IniR � z iliyi F- ' qI #lii R 14 Q : tY. —hYet m ililil o u-i Vf�IO1 HI I— i ,—it,,,,,, m I! Iihili Ii IY o L (Y. deed Ng 1 IIi1Rgdlilildliiil ....�.,�4 \ N,, i I 16I V I I I pili li itilllili9IIRIR Aldi �_ �. r ilI1d11iIlFl➢; I I,I l I:I oo f,I l 601 111..I_1I J J 1Illllllll�lllllilllll RI= J ___1101 al ---_—�I J Jl mIUhIIIIIIInII A - JJJ 1 04 El]J JIJI — J J J I11hRell'l Ia --s _ J JI Ne. EIJJJI IB]_I J JI dlIiliiil4I I®J J11J - JIJJ EH__i J JI I5 mm ,Idiii - : Vit i} a El,' a SNOISIA The Proposed Variance will: Yes No Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. The current setback ordinance requires 35 feet from the curb to the living space. We currently meet that requirement and would like extend 5 feet, reducing the number of feet from the curb to the living space to 30 feet. This distance will allow the front door to be moved away from the bottom of the stairs in the entryway. Currently, when the front door is opened it comes within 6 inches of the first stair of the stairway going upstairs. This creates a bottleneck when the front door is opened and people enter the house. With this remodel we will be "fixing" an original design issue and creating improved space to meet guests Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district As stated above,the interference between the front door and the V bottom of the stairs in the entry way does not exist in other houses in the vicinity. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance We will extend 5 additional feet towards the street,which is the distance that newer neighborhoods are allowed. Also—we will be keeping the siding and brick consistent across the house, and adding a handrail for the front steps for safety purposes. Not alter essential Character of a neighborhood The appearance of the property will be improved with a new porch and entrance which not detract, but improve the character of this property and help keep our neighborhood to Edina's high standards. Additionally,although our setback will be 5ft closer than our bordering neighbors,we live on a circle with line of sight not being a factor. • I CITY OF EDINA MEMO City Hall •Phone 952-927-8861 91��jry� Fax 952-826-0389 •www.CityofEdina.com %( e \ O co •' ORaOIuC£O• . PP� Date: August 24, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review— 6600 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 22 acre parcel at 6600 France. (See location on pages A1-A5.) The request includes consideration of a multiple (5) phase development. As proposed, at full built out, the site would include a new 6-story medical building, a new 6-story hotel, a new 8-story residential apartment, two new 2-story retail buildings, and the new single story Bank of America. (See phasing plan on page A39.) Existing buildings that would remain include the 7-story office, the 6-story office and the Tavern on France. The only building that would be removed from the site is the office building that connects to 7 and 6 story office buildings. (See proposed development plans on pages A6-A40.) To accommodate the request the following is required: ➢ A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the height maximum from four stories to eight stories; and ➢ A Rezoning from POD-2 to PUD, Planned Unit Development The Southdale Area Development Principles have been shared with the applicant; they have incorporated many of the core principles into the proposed plans. They have divided the large parcels into smaller blocks providing pedestrian and transit separations and connections. Sidewalks are proposed completely around and through the site; they are providing the 50-foot setback on France Avenue with green space and sidewalks; have created storefronts on France with the new retail buildings; and have tied into the pedestrian and car connections to Southdale as shown in the Southdale Vision Plan. (See pages A25-A27.) The PUD rezoning is required to allow the proposed housing on the site and the increase in floor area ratio (FAR). Housing is not allowed under the current zoning, but would be allowed under the existing OR, Office Residential Comprehensive Plan designation for the site. (See the current zoning and comprehensive plan designation on pages A4-A5.) City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO ,s4( • •t:4C.ryA Pa��G�� The PUD would also ensure compliance with the Southdale Development Principles, and that affordable housing would be a component of the future residential tower that is suggested as a late phase (phase 5) of the development. As demonstrated on the following table, the FAR and height of the proposed development is not allowed by current City Code. City Standard (POD- Proposed 2) New Building Setbacks Front—France Ave 35 feet or the height of the building 50 feet Front—Valley View 35 feet or the height of the building 110 feet Front-66th Street 35 feet or the height of the building 60 feet* Parking Setbacks Front— France Ave 20 feet 10 feet(existing) Front—Valley View 20 feet 10 feet(existing) Front-66th Street 20 feet 0 feet* Building Height 4 Stories or 48 feet whichever is less 6 stories-Medical& Hotel** 8 stories— Residential** 2 stories - Retail Building Coverage 30% 20% Maximum Floor .50 of the tract .82 of the tract* Area Ratio (FAR) Tract size = 22 acres or 948,632 s.f. 781,988 existing and proposed 474,316 s.f. MAX Parking Stalls (Site) 1 space per 300 s.f. + restaurant= 1,954 spaces 1,875 spaces Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet * Variance Required ** Variance & Comprehensive Plan Amendment Required City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO e , T *LI ,*-7, Additional Considerations/Staff Concerns aa• ➢ A traffic and parking study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The study would include the full development buildout. ➢ Watershed district review. Review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is required. ➢ Sustainable design. As part of any formal application, sustainable design should be included. PUD The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO (.454Ae• ar cn •�c'ontvn.tw/ 880 h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/18/2016 Rosi and Park - - 1 inch = 1,600 feet PARCEL ID: 3002824410001 Comments: OWNER NAME: Southdale Office Partnrs Llc Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS: 6600 France Ave S, Edina MN 55435 PARCEL AREA: 21.78 acres, 948,632 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 /1C , Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/18/2016 ' '''''' ''' k ''''''".. 4 17-7117":,--,....-:,,.,.,-.''j 71..,--,!.--':-17,. - 're:- ...4:.,-*t. "--,,4 1,!: g1:4,4-1:11.;„;":-.1,,' .-.:.: ....' $ ric7—r- F,''r, fIv' 24'Illik -''' irti- ,...,,_- '-••• .-=';:::112-1:2'' , '3' 7 ':'-**1.''. ."„1,.,11: ,*ritri Itt:' , ,. t.,'7*7. ';-'.-. ''''f.- ----t a ^-yy i ss. '-..,..-1'.:,-y, `tl .�all '..::•E:04 1,�J 11! � -..'0'.,,, ....„'gf—L* 1'1 z. d-,ia... ».it I.- ,P-.4,-''..,-.. s .,,y... F f g Hy l C 1?+ `4 `t31,.t_� * - � * . 91 'Y�Ori4". � t ,1111� ,. II . - t ,, -c} .� _ L ! ;srYl.„,_ '.t -.1r, 7_._,..5.,,,, '. ( 1 9iY V ` .1� 'i �g_kt rt'r, L1'A ( "w ,,y •�L ,°. }kms ii� y §1 g k' r j. C F ' hi, 'f �. t 4 sX4 s , r.. 1M m ,1 & I ' * ' --'- li, e',"(7';'. , - ; ;W.•,. rNi:1115 ' LtreF r. »y * -x-, r. 1t Y� T 1, ' + . . .+ar+ 1 # { �i1 • tai ._ a. eel�160$,,,,,,, _ _ Y ' .• ' A 1. - a , „:41si,,7*,_;;_i,_ ,,c,,::?.01.. { A " {@ `t�' t 1 inch = 800 feet PARCEL ID: 3002824410001 Comments: OWNER NAME: Southdale Office Partnrs Lic Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS: 6600 France Ave 5, Edina MN 55435 PARCEL AREA: 21.78 acres, 948,632 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable PROPERTY TYPE: Commercial-Preferred for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 8/18/2016 }. z s ` ,', -iii n■ za ., V . ., _ , . i / ' ' ,_''__-: , .„,,, 1 ,„,•Z y_.7....-: 1„1....,,,, s I/��j7��[i 5' ✓' _ i `!.uS ! 4 t• sig r +f{gyy'q� lit -_ $" 4>'�'/I _ T "`. - g ____q@I£` f2. _ ,{ . i` •.. F f 1-16\ .i Ri lc .. F - +a R '�' ?$ •'Txi. �? _ .i. `� eft , y 4 - if _; e 3 . S. 4 - ; of - .,i i w� "rte f` � « t �� F s - ! / 5e , _ r f „ ,,` fi -•° '% kt' `�V_'_ 1 inch =400 feet PARCEL ID: 3002824410001 Comments: OWNER NAME: Southdale Office Partnrs Llc Site Location PARCEL ADDRESS: 6600 France Ave S, Edina MN 55435 PARCEL AREA: 21.78 acres, 948,632 sq ft This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COP YRIG HT©H EN N EP I N COUNTY 2016 Edina Zoning Map - t a�n Edina Zoning Map Edina Planning Division City of Edina Website Zoning Ordinances K he i i ! 1 ' ' IV--%1 — • - - s Dund e Rd ,N e _ ____ ., - .4,-,, „ca.-4 ______ _________ _ __ .-i. ,,, ..,, . ,-..t , ,,,,,..... ....._ — . ,-,..4„...5 ..„.., _ ,-, ....p. '1'_" rig -i Legend 7474 ► Ci." i or4 Edina Zoningno. - L>:Y:' �� f' I—izf 1 I Edina City Limits 1 ( i . Districts `--� i , R-1 -Single Dwelling Unit ::, R-2-Double Dwelling Unit / .i IIPRD-1 - Planned Residence _ i \ ' laPRD-2 Planned Residence ,r:',t. PRD-3 Planned Residence ( di"i` 1 '� ) .. 1- r I 40• PRD-4-Planned Residence ' ;!; PRD-5-Planned Residence yJ 4 F7 / 4 PCD-1 Planned Commercial (--1-11(----;'-----e• --- f PCD-2-Planned Commercial � E--!•--E-,-.?---42:1,,,,:/_-.11,-.24.4,,,,:i--.:...;,.."f 1 I -�9',�_ PCD-3-Planned Commercial � ''' iT ,--1.---i . :,rr' r ' O PCD-4-Planned Commercial . Jiih� !' i"; ', i1.5/, ; ;, • POD-1 -Planned Office _ ,,, i l• ' .� _ _ r El POD-2-Planned Office Y I tJ il RMD-Regional Medicali � '' 1 elm ri PID Planned IndustrialAI P1rl� i :J r �. - g „, Jn 111 PUD Planned Unit Development : i I ��. 1 - t ---1—#!------ 1 T Edina Ihf'PId 5 i _ . .g 5 ._:5--5„_,,-'5-5 55ix z Ir i ei ,- o.; 44.889-932,99 Degrees All Rights Reserved ________ —_—_,..___-------._____. o61-7---'''''Tifis...for living,learning,raising families&doing business \� 2008 Comprehensive Plan) (.,,,, im* �. - Legend w 30th se II IDR-Imo Dandy Nmidental [J OR.OHkekesideneal RM.Regional Medical II LDAR-Lela Derma AttzehedRoidefial ®0.OM. 1111111.OSP-Open Space and Pahl ,,...,,,,L,--,411, II MDR Med um Deed RnW n l -taC Med Ue.Cmler PSP PO Se,lPUD a �- j , l HDR•High DeniteRmiaudiL ®CAC.C.,,,,, ,ecey Centel 1111111.I...Lhmt...a NORM 1111111111,NC.Neg hell d Commercial 111111111,I.Industrial 7 (P�,r 11) F': ' ...p.... i I> m i U = 1 t NC. + i.„, a s+4` 't"V D F ri-j � �' .�` S:-F .. �`f Y F 3' ��^ _; .5., A } P l '4._'-',..-.4 ob 4 w71 I ,21-0-'44h 5 , `-'" a �` c ,acv -"i 1 �t� 04 fli a r4,. —r ' } 1 tai iT 1„,,7-sr; .���:44 'tv?1; T r .xR.`4r L.:.--IF,}� t,,, ---—.. ._L a ,.. ,„..,.:4':‘".7:-L'-±' yr 4.ey.,;44:''''77L:2',.---1-11,... '. rJ., i l �i�Yl " »,� � +Fa Vaal'('�" .a N = _�W}�qc tlF�y R-,r#�,t'� vis g ``� 'tin p r a- ;a,,"';, " r s a it v..;6 i ,ea7r --calix xairs t- 1 1� ° I IEttli mmm g l: N` MDR , } `1VIDR 3 I aT 3= -_a nz a / 1 i ar „.,.::.?„.-----..,,F40,71 -- �';a. s JI e . a-.t i i F „nia tox7"T S� ""� l61 ga.. p •1 r �zi -- <V 71- A' L'lit'. -r.,y�` y f-5�r Zl .EE3P,- L >; r �� - i TIDRI }t�;j t 1 5” s �� Z Isslns- / v t .4�� ��p�y „..„,..•,...:1 • a .Gl' „ gs" °C... tst �, 53 �� en fi ` . ete et ',Alg O�t"r'l% t r 116 n •_' ` / o i- . mux , ,.iiv 5r p I �_ c m ` — • ; r ; 5 a.•`t'L i. . a • it -.41.. a �..;t :_.. —ir 7v Ali _ -° s � # '� r r..a 1-1!--,..21,.4' a.+s'Tvry T x 6' I i� EEE333 ��• - _ , \1 4 i 4- 9r 1: r±It p K taa a.. = ;emu a .. .. _ - aistil N •�/ LIU --ee;a:k.1n jf s }s$11 ' t� ALl�? u ;� n' R ,,,.. • • .r I^ R ,4%m,,,,,r.,!-..7= it m SIS _t11 MIMI �� � — ! 1;.' '''.1,--.'1.011, 1 n ,DR`s :F .'.MDR r f fie "` :L fl 1 y� z " " ti., : 11 , j` 4-ow OR l -v17fIgln OR, Al ,a �.. ii. / I 0 1 �I r(y �t,�eon l e 1 '�. , w 75th at _1�i otos`I ID1tLs1 (a - te It -*n w�. I r: iI k G, �9iry Figure 4.3 (114(;):)) City of Edina Future Land Use Plan '3.--......,:s- ..J 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Data Source:URS 0 I— L f-L_! I 0 0.5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design fir 4-25 Promenade on France 6600 France Avenue S Edina, MN 55435 I ; 1 ....e, ,I r„:4. , irr : 'A. ' 4-, PS *t _ji -1‘ tri--..., - _ __ --1, v'•- v.:4r. ' I' ' , f -. 4. s---, tt�' - City of Edina -Sketch Plan Submittal 08.10.2016 01-1 ,DAhh lt ,' DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. Table of Contents " - ` • Contents r_ .� trod .,i 1 �� Introduction a, t � '�'°- - — •," 5 °`., t'* i "" - :;a "' Table of Contents 2 7 , �., , ., ,► --y; Site Analysis _ Current Site Conditions 3 „,� Zoning Map 4 l ""' ,w..q , ', „^� Circulation Map 5 "� iisi st* � *4 Survey/Topography 6 ¢ t Recent Developments 8 tf`rw — • -� Size Compar .. n - Ison 10 ti _ ,"q Proposed Project , Land • scape* •--04,---,,,,,-, ' : . Civil 23*, '' 14 ` 29�, a .0 .2wriii vdr t .- meq_ -F `kli '"-° 7 ; -"--- ,rIr. • - f .� Developer .,,_ ' i::-',..,,ii ,,,I. ,,, ' ,, 7 ''''''•: - '''';'," ,,: :..s,',,,,,-*---- , , ,..!"..•.. ,,,:"•.,,,-:•1•,-.4„,,,,,...,,,./.:,, . .-4,046 t -'27""-- ,'• ..;,-,:.:i 'E -'.'.',.:`..417:i.". •!..,-,..t,.- r - r f -fir:. - 6800 France Avenue S,Suite 555 , "Vi. Xr .1'''-'-, a.- s Edina,MN 55435 . w- -- J. ': :.! ger -• r-;.. - .�x. - k - Design Team -c. .it ' ,} ' '- ,.w�,.; _ ---: t";^„-..' ,�. - Architect DJ R 333 Washington Avenue N,Suite 210 r ` V. w:.: ARCH CTUR6 MC. •Minneapolis,MN 55401 �. - At I DF/DAMON FARB Landscape Architect F ,.• `�401 2nd Avenue N,Suite 410 _ Minneapolis,MN 55401 .y ;-` • ... - `"'` '`'^•- ' _.L. - -- BKlSM=. Civil Engineer ' - -,I " ENGINEERS -,-,--- - 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard 'L.----. ----7-7-- Minneapolis,MN 55429 Aerial View DJR. Promenade on France 2 ARCHITECTURE ING Current Site Conditions yrs „� � � •. 1r145 ++� �•,. y, F a T A.:1 Op _�j � � • L . y,.y.,,�! .�Cr J • d� ""'%: � .'�. Hyk� y • 1 2 t dam'.- r a+ .' • from France , i 1.France Avenue S&W 66th Street Intersection fj 'le! - 4 a• S.View of Site o a c � n � ...',1,:/''' .:•-j: 6'. .70*; ". ..--(';---1.' ,;°- 7;2.•„.‘,'.•.••,-.--• ' !-,-. • - 1- ' '; • ...t° , W. — i ;°-'''''' * 1 . • r e u " ) 1� �,-'T- ^e1M+ilP f tiDieWRw,'v!�!M>•anR ,1-',-;::2! M" '.M #kyr k '4.� t .: A ��� � � walk yp � r8 -4 s+'. ., .tis' 4 • •j5 * �'ajg,.,p. '..� --'-t�q•�h,easa a'" .^,� ..:...,. , h ""ram... .: r al* ,,__'� a, �, Y' f"' • '•" 1 y, k •_ , r * r'' 1. k^' :,/ 3�1 " -44 -t t � �' ''may` r, _ .:` p .X" .., "„..,..,....:.......1,..,„, ..,„,____:1,+ a ,. 1 'c g cam. y , .,,,...,:vit.. ., ,... �1� '�• � i �y4t1+ S . z.: 7¢ t �"r . Mw � X i1a- _ `: . at .•r - - 7.Tavern on France 2.Valley View Road ..�,...r., � ,may •, ., r-. - .... ,> °E a**�. , _ � "'� .y"�� i X nwa- rA'>* .,�.f}�yy ® �. � 2%.t„,,,..-'•--, .'� 3•,`"/�_ Ai� <�:+ i�. ._ 3.View of Site from Valley View Road 4.View of Site from France&69th Street 5.France Avenue S&69th Street South Intersection 6.View of Site from France Avenue Promenade on France DJR 3 Zoning Map Edina Code of Ordinances i \\'',N.“1...4' ger jws � :Orl r s ar q1n r, r Site Information: 1\'', “`fir „ I j] T ]i lh. x ( Area:948,632 SF(21.78 acres) l .. ';�� ,'a I ' 'x`r. fr. r ,,,e-,, ef-+ , `. '-.q ,r,:', '. t I Zoning:POD-2 - �E'a .•l `a ' ' - r Ftv�' >�, -f B� .t,,,,'--,,:7,,,,--, f�,, 7 �.4 .' FAR-.5 of tract per Sec.3.6-578 s I I `r. - s+4a,...a ' -- "''• Max.Bldg.Height-4 stories 0 p per Sec.36-1214 HOD-4 ; \"v„ti.,,,,, , , f `{t. Maximum Bldg.Coverage-30%perSec.36-578 I � J 1 i. .... . ,1L. Wil ' 1' _ l�, - , ,,t Parking Requirements-perSec.36-1311 "_y .A dr epi- .."11 1' . --.- r+a+ s _ "� f �s * sl 9 '' Y4.r� Setbacks-per Sec.36578 � �l __- " " 7 �Y 1k � r � Front Street-35, / / o r Side Street-35'* r/ ,- 03 `° - "6• '�+ `+ .t : - - t- Interior Side Yard-20'* }�- i ' .,-. - 'q'a� ® -� RearYard-20'* �.--- s-:- `- I0 I - \ - I ^ ' , *Or the building height,if greater. - -_ 'k i -_ I ,� � ' ' Proximity - f_ ,= / 1, 4-. '¢� �'kto 1District-Per Sec.36-579 --i--- ..ii,,m,,"`. ,..�, -u s, - '<" 6 5-6 stories-Twice the height of the office bldg. _. --- __ # .-.r art" Pti'. - t ' , i , 9 F Materials-per Sea36-579 - - . 1.Face brick r • POD-2 I'' 'r, PCD-3 w'. 2.Natural Stone Y� --f;• *!,4 3.Specially designed precast concrete units i �'•� r I 4.Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel " } City of '°' construction , /` 1 r ' .� 1 Richfield t 5.Glass orprefinished metal .. i, i" 1 '� i • ,• :0?..,,,-,;":::.-` PCD 3:. ` . t i 1 �s '' "" 3' l' "` Key 40, • "CO *� r\( 1, Al Planned Office District-2 r} /, -- — 5c� ,r.�'i1 , ¢- Planned Commercial District-3 l t I' x— i Residential Medium Density I. `` %PCD 3 PCD-3 PCD-3 .--,,.. . f13 ``` Planned Office District 1 1 q- '' j Planned Unit Development _ -- _, ---1 f _ y Residential 1 1 \)' 'i. ry r i!._�L ', n 1 ill 1,1R 1 PCD-3 I i PCD 3 R 1 �.w Planned Residential Development-4 Zoning Map DJ R Promenade on France 4 nacr+rtecn�rse rtac. Circulation Map Greater Southdale Area ''''14.-- '''''1..:''' „.. ,., ' •� 4"'�„� vn ,. •- _ Y-, `' r� , '' ,�y . :' '. - ':x * , ; The"Greater Southdale Area”is defined by Edina's corporate g•` r e , x-A*' • t Jnr boundary(east and south),State Trunk Highway 62/Crosstown ":a..d �L,..Wy y -} • t »' - r+ (north)and the extension of Valley View Road(west).These pe j i ,'' <✓ <._. ' boundaries capture the core of a Southdale Area(between ;,�,�. � @ *; ,#ra, • x France Avenue and York Avenue and the immedlatelyadjacent '` , it - , properties. ,moi+., " 4 , "'-�" !� 'i,„,„ # < �.. '„,,,,,4".;,...i.:;,,,,,4-4--":1-! .j Vision for Greater Southdale Area: v x Y .�1'f �W 6 th' eet" " g Sys^',"* . . /.Faith • �,^"M'a.- ` •''.R' ---- ._r-p us .� .+rv� .�,+xie...—i1-.1,-.--,.....,,,I,•::: -..1.**--- ' :744., , �df�+(h - . , .„-.a r„, •.._.,.. ♦ r H THE GREATER S AS A PREMIER AREA WILL MAINTAIN AND EN- 4..+ x,,, «,' '.i. 1 ial.,si No, ��A i a. „� ", '� „ ;,„*: n �} �°k? A t:j„ HANCE ITS STATUS AS A PREMIER SHOPPING DISTRICT. r • 2.THE GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA IS A PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO ti, 'f' ] g ." , „ " t ':'k .3 "' r' LIVE,WORK,PLAY AND SHOP. - {� k w ." r,' �` +'s t'r g 4 "- , 3.THE GRATER SOUTHDALE AREA IS DESIGNED TO FACILITATE ^ " ��� �� r I � 41,-----110,"-...#.Ioot3. i� MOVEMENTINAVARIETYOFWAYS t P L" � , r .Yid . �' ,r ,, i '` �j li (' �z From:Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Transportation Study Report(2005) a t 'et�' .,'fir; .til f^ S L� 11 q,z�4 a 's ,, ,• f - .- II;i, �. q"�xtt f sN.,r ,' t .4.;-3� „1 r ,.° Key s.: 99911 `" -,'aC.t a'',:t dd f, .t e c{n a i r! 4...i. "�- pp . ——— Main Vehicle Traffic ' k �w� +¢�95 ,, ,k,,,,0).., A�)..,414 W 4f��l' �:}'ns' atw .; .;... 4'. ' r { 4 ,rY ° � BUs Routes 4 ,bf. N'' �, ' F,'I a IT '" k •Y 1 7.4-2,4'1,r I x a k 1 �� #' tops • BUS$ ,-» IEji1 p, t♦♦ 1' Bike Friendly Roads ,f.4.4v, T tiro II 4� 4 M �u ' ' `W 7 th,Street �,�w� " ` Controlled I t.# onr> � � '�,:--:aw=. ^ . � ,� � n Intersection a.�. .-, —� �;aaw 4 � ... .a+aT•s�M..,+'�y;,� —�.wfti�+..ri. - �,t - r '* '. . -i-4,21. F., 'i, '''''''' i''.'il • a s :���1� I r.z%1�11 R J _ r. Is y 14941 Ev+'I, .�,, i; ri'i t.Ti r t Circulation Map Promenade on France 5 ®J ARCHITECTURE INC.. ,....1-.0431.1111_. + , 1 z '' --.11 r, T, A. 4 !: \-I • 1 I. o� �) 1 e --y - FF i j' J •r' 1. c ` _-'74„, @ t i- • e• i.' • ,,, ''� / t. !1 .. S _ J ILS -t• 1:_.._....-._ • --,\- f . .. iii - o ,II f LL-TE • • = - __LL 0 Ip ` i ✓ :i o U _ I c 1 c ' UI _ j a ol>. .��, t .. .1 a o i.,.l i 1 U C .-t . — rl! I , r t4 c o y r -- ,,; a E. Y,s { u t a a Y_.. �,_" 3o a L G x _L-==-•P E LL oH _ _ _ - __ _si `s' q.qt U) ti no :,..,......„.:•T=.7"'"' 4:•;.-T.s` _-_ 0164.'.r •1••:,,,,,,•••-•-•—,,,,1,2•2, Q� Existing Development/Topography(200') —41' z,,;,�.. ,$$$ ;: E '�+ \ 'f `'. The aerial shows the topography and existing development on qtr ` s ., r,�v�- e i��,—n'i91 �ci \�., �;4 � ,}(0,,,,:=- ,t-„..•-• ^" ,'s I the proposed site with the adjacent properties beyond 200'. •••'••16 ''''-'.'','•' �,., b t a b.. I ,,,,,Y...,;,, °x�,:� � , L � �y�� ¢ Le-''r - The hi h points of th2 sitewithelevationsof880'+at the NE cor- .�(( ',y ,� P_ �1�,�✓ "s; �°'»�� . ..T: "��rql la:'r r. _ b. .��� '" eg,. ,L :" �C4t. • '".,� ejr;i, i _-a& "'�+u ,� _ ti' `t 4 ner of the site alon France Avenue and the West side mid-block0 2 " 'd• A '*x > i�'"' yamm,-,,,i,4,0ju r°` �3� ' ' � � R' � 1 a � at an existinggrov of trees. „, 'aT - �°' 0 ..„ I s, 1 ,..„....6..,,.....,_,,,,„_,_,,„,,,,,,,,,.„.,,,F*__._ a a �f,a t The low point of the •site occurs in the Southwest and Northwest �'t, ��� i corners where the elevation is below 870'. '�.3 v ' s�ns`���y� �f o ._.,:.-,, ,,1--"97.,',,,7,,.,.*, , r ' I�► r �- 1, A 'rwj`�,'�` `'� .,-,47, 1',`'.4441$` .y, e<� �� \: '.v. `, u�ytyr"`ai3p,, 4 +, ar a�y, ._____ m�^6'e-�- .. _�_- .7, '��,.,_,,,,_,,v,,,„. tt'f,5'.y Xaa 4` +c� .d,'�' = S F''' • T f' . � ' f \: F:; a 6 ley ,t#, aR r'a w.` Y x'x�.4-ar(�s ., � a r 1�' ,I'., t oxo 1° '.. 11 �:� PPS}} :::,,,N•:-.,,,":. tF,l x'�' - r+ a `t ri r ,fit Oz�IV i'µ'�li (gyp 9 i� �' A. 1 i't' 4 2, ti L ' n� r'F � Y y P --'_'_, ti fT%-,'. ey"x"Z Rami '0 �.g,�.. I/l 7p A ug,:00 , EF7.„ ,,,,,,..„7„,,,..,_,,„: 77 1_,.f. l\ ` " t�”�+,',;;. � fir,.lk.C tr: \.. \-3 ,t t1�; li to t i. L... .' a3*' �f} " E 5 e a A 6r"'�. !!:',-7,,..',0i,''•405•-•,:;']:' —' 7 + 1 r ' 1. �t�r� , k�u ��''� �, tEe l ��- �' K �- a fz e�l�4, 5 8.G ''n.+s z a ` 4 "Ef E s " E" 6ii .�� fi+ "'�„ Y t r `"". '1°" ;'I I '.., .' + . "`'�. ` '1. t i ,),, � _�.ct1`.,i st � ` I .. ° Ck'�� It Slp ', F U - i E 4 � ryt Y � -AL" �� y '. E I ,T�:1' h de. FE . , tiE � fit .. '� a�;l ; Y;`� �m ;'.-:'-':::‘,•'•-?.',''(... f :, 1-�� F VOft p� :4:23,7.14:1,1161 ., 1 35 ti' ' --�i,^ a )t.:, ,,,,,::,,,..ftic*,_.,'.n,-,.::,..-.::-,14 ..f 5r f ''r ls,.li �l I �����r {a� �.'.:,,,,i.:1,4-414.0.,R044,4�. 7�1� �, "p , (. II i ! ,r i! , 0:4:2 'k r ,aF r 6hwr���/�'4�����' �R �ri � �tiiiii�if f}tl ��"� �' w�f Eut ���'��9t` ^��I .I� r �.' sI"�'�'r' g�k ' � " �� � ' ," g gss E7'.7 11E i r i r .! Ailir?,t `--.'% r,',. m �`'s e ' 3 ✓I •aI � ����I� { (� {I �,:tit '(�aW 7t �1i r�s c' rEit$" L� P ) 49 0 ;!;' �� �N', IRI:,:, 1113:[ R' 1l iT i =JJ k S 4 1' w� e ! a I\1 ., y la�d s r, S Y a..., i.',:'"§IddmY` ` •' , 5 I L ti s,� �`� '-f y C R s I n !4..,,,,, ,,____,„,,,,.,..‘4,::-.--- M.' 3 rr a..� "t',;'r � vv''^ �h+'aT uun .v ..lrm,cre".u,�r�".7i �"l RD 'e „ � r7. r T' �-0m.a„ vsnmwc. +_'a'-�i n F' ., F<'' .� ,..w L;+`,,. c, ,.a.0 Sao . 7 "'� s.r- , ri .ee_ "`ti�tfl? :-.a`"w.zr1 '^�,,�v 'ra6.�' � '_: " , �, ws I f 1� n ltm t 1 w �S 7111 __„sr'r •u`nP wI r ..-, 3 '' . i� ryt Stwk.4i�xt -w t r r ct f:.I s•v W,P41.1,pf Irih.,-sx \ .l p.' Q ,-k.., '-,i .bit _.r :fi.cF 5 p'' ' 'AA 'ar h'S Iv '`�s"�IA`T'� `��� 4-} �� 3"��7+ `° '�,� rgt J , ,,,,,4„,.,,,,*,,,,,„„„;,,,. � �`.s1i�,r�x'' �+ �` �a ,T s a t N r � ,10..,,,,.4;;. : ,.e.. ".� t-� t. ,� �. � , '4,N, � # ,�.1�J,..Y`�. �� '!, "e�„.�.J.! \ �s ''A'7{g�, E. ° � c'f I (eo^'k+. ��' W,rr n{,r t ig i �d^r .[ 4 al.. 3..�',y ���v:.�I'' r Sm 1�.hr f sir a: s a aA .: , : �a a h a k4 3 II3 ,1 , j �>i ii. .4ti3O �1.p.i a ,Jr' zsY,yy +'dY 4 Y \e :Ea , v i(aVr 1:,, l` 11 y a' a i� 5, e PO it . 4° '� `r /,,,MI j " :4 i .�.ixA °` ra ;;;O .�1 4 .. 4,4-t, , ,i „ i , ra, d -- a +c,k.h `,, 0 �� a a v dal i 1. / 3.t3nvie��.a i to u:V� s Jp, ° i, �'r ,a e a! :.„...0,,,.� ,,k'` °' v t'ti-�a '' AP'•P { ;.a }',,4 P4 a. a a '� •I% •:.,,,-4,,,, r' ? .�s3'�1 _ 47% IRA iE' ll 'l I2 3?'"ta � .a"�v 4 w�;Ra',•,: r j .�at� �,a.- \ \ � S i�►�'`' +1C, "'r d { I"'S '- 41.t 60. ti n44,14,-;•.; 1 I,k:., I 1 - Ji , ,i V,l a ' 1. �.L aq las , \ G \9 �.c \li 1� n 4 t l ;y ., S f ,fe9w - ,1f� l;? q�f,.} 11.11 n ,�i s 1;4, �:kerne'',.',,-.1e, r ar ,,,,,A-0, .. • 9t1! rd ui 1 riyyi'd r.w� - Y r F k f P>y I%ay'"k if . ye f, a �'>� Obi'kl J i 1 i> f roa7t of N � d.g,, a`",i+^r°�`'^ aha '. f-'T, „--x,;,,„,-,0,4,- ;`0` .F..�`8 Pt.+ix�r� i :. S w ,.y k..�� d, 1313 .-�.._ �. _ �:. ^� ., <l.¢ „4^�. R:� 43 �� .f.- At« J . 117ri �aN,,. Proposed Site Aerial NTS with Topography from the City of Edina O N Promenade on France tE Bank of America Images and other retail on France Avenue(for reference to existing development) - -- ., r, - erti , 11 ' -,[ llig,l'i - ' r,.•':i -; - "' L.. irtli rom ORA''' ', °ew 1,, rx,A, ° II , • ' • i .. oli 444t, , 1 -4 .' r -61.1°' '' ....--..,,eve.,3tkv, e •°- ' ,, 3 , ;.;,. ,t,:,.. 14,. ,, 17.1 1,,,,, !• 0- .',-.,- , ' t 1 -,— ....: , + , • _ _t a ...._ ,_. Iri _ 1:1„... :..Z...lerfr, 1 e .,., -,...,:!;*1 . ---,, i 1 1 r . k,.. . ,e.e r;,,,',- -,=-• ,...;.-,, 10,1,6.1 • ' , -,...) . '• ' - , _ ic,, -,r, "...2. :".N.-{Xit: 1 1' y... ..., , 4.....it r E 1,,,kiali ; P r 4 40„1 ill I-•-,-E '" Uki-,1' • .t.rn it$ `-.::- ,,,,,,,.49E6 -E, 1 . -i- • "'---"...:.:.%.1...1---- '4..‘. '' . ' . NI ', -,',,,'' :" -' - ' .' --'4,,';'-*.--•'-' `-,- . ' • -'—r-1 - 41V.'--,'",4-7..",c-L;',-;1_- ',,,,,' • Tfti ,,:•-•`'---f---44$11 ..--‘' -''' -, ' . '-, - . _ . •..• .,•-.' \ •"1-- rAA '..'-- ,.,_ - ' '-: HI u 1 1,___,' . ,,', *, -I, - -, L___•-___11, '„t`-, --_ - , ,'' •:,„,,, „ ,, -- ,' ,,, ' , . , ,t'r• . ..-,,- ,- * ,..,,,-7. ' c t 390/W 70th Stree ,-,', ';' -- ' ..,,,-, : 4 „..,./ . •„ ...... ..- -- . BOA Site Plan .4 ' ,..,-;;;,i" .. 4.P.1 R 2 ' _; ., Ast,- 4.---400Ait,476 . • --lir, : - ir„,./.. _.....__ is* .. - - -; , ._.... ,,. ' Ip:°-$4,1:- 1'-'1"Y '• ,;"140 '-- au.t'II."--. ',:ii,...',. '' .1 'i4 ,, - ,,,•,.N •'i" .'"-..';' 1 ' ' -- 4, ti.,, , ,, r --111- ,,,P.-,, „1 f 11 '. , ,,, • „. /,-„,-- , ` ioet,,...,:oile. -*00; ', --*,44,4,.• . irikiN4 k-,'.:;',-- ;.1r,,-_ 3.10W-- ,----_:,-,4i__ '' " , .0,,, _,' '' ,°,'4.: , I-,-.,„,,,A ' .,•,;, ,!-----.4 1.1,', -_.m?„,..,,,,.., 1 , ' r., 0,,,F,... .,'„",!.... , -' ''',._,, ;'," ''''i. -fr.:!..3„,...,;::,-..,—.." Fzgt,,-:•..e-.71970 i .-:',- s / --- ,- - .4"1:...4J0m- - __-_-_-_:----- ----•.,- ,11.14444.--- -,- ;,„rt;;;;Itc-- ,r I. 14 --- , ..--d ,'----- .,,,....---„ ' .,• '.1% -- ,,,...._, 1--" ',,),.,',31 -- ‘, 4,;.• '- "'"""wri ..-;.,; - ; • .°1 l'i1 BOA Perspective Future sae wall from Valley View Road 6996 France Avenue S DJR Promenade on France 8 1 Other Recent Developments , = maw 1.Bank of America ,i .� + ,, * ,A 6868 France Avenue S :t .� 2.Homewood oskAve w ,. ., ` 6600Y nue S , :� * • ! 3. The GatewayPointe 111P , ,;_ a ,hw , + a+ - ;� 3101 West 66th Street • . r :-.� ... 4.Mlllentum * a ri + s ax as.e ii ' 3250 West 66th Street / 4 " ' , ' 8=� z� s ' * 5.Continental Gardens < a •r ' 7141 York Avenue , ' it _ �� ., ' .4 g„, . , 6 66 West Apartments ' � i.\.: \l'4' ` r 3330 West 66th Street� A w '!�: ” a 7 6725 York Apartments r a, '` 1* . .- , , $ � 6725 York Avenue �,� � � ���. '-\ � � ,,,k-.; ��." � ,� ~ 8.Southdale Medical Campus gyp.' ' , ^`. �� ""` ' �° � 3800 W 66th Street r g , • ' ` • . 1 r �.hr 9.Aurora on France r k �, , 'p :it ;- 6500 France Avenue P ✓ r ",,,,, c/ r� � 4 , "-410.Phoenix Plaza " r r� sn 6996 France Avenue > *,yam' ". �,. I , y+,t'h{� i . �" r t �- -,� 11.E France 2 ,�+� r' . •`�. ,�1 y -,�� i k. 3901 West 70th Street "4^'" `:. #,a t 1y 2' , ; `� I- %' �i #-i "i,:a r¢�i, `+iS94r > ) " 4 ' F ++ i ; YYYYYY 'lie ;�,u .��. Y .I E _ �.,+� ' 3` "tet,.. ... , °k k .e t;x ,� > }�,is {�.. .j '7- T-Fm.:,':;....lilt': ,,- .‘,"1. ' :.'w.,3t , " ' . 3 of.jr. 1 ''k M ,c^ ., .IIt d µ • „> y ..fir{ x: ... ,t=+ /�+, ...-?••••:., lci� `�10 � t".rrl.. �" ':C � 7.� ,� �� A ��e { ". `."... .N' M -..... .,,4•740- - lkW 4�. .p qg J,+,--,,-.•� T., ;,, w'+n rLd, ,-%. t: 3' ` .a <> , li t� `� tl� � �•, �� � �� -� �� .�� gni � A � ��+ Development Map Promenade on France DJ R 9 ARCFiTECTJRE SNC. Size Comparison r""' (..-41%, V , ' ,,, .. .» 9.0, fr17..,.'1.:........,,....,:'‘,.,.11':,'. ZI + iie A, 4\ a�v ",„ ' _-,,,,ti .4- ,..._.'i..., . eIr, _ *•77,77' -t tir.�u- i+ll.� _ , i �, a ;.. r _ _ . a*tft r � f --_ S.� � f,:,..;.....;?:-7-,?-k.?,,,'-4.- . l . � +t"5 -,,6n ^ rF u ,' >_2 �'i� moi '3-.. a �. �`. "'^,T- „ ,.'"""...' f i?^a t '"`*ems 'a .•.- -'-,.s•.-•� _�,+waron, t.,.,,..,,..,1_.,7:,11:..,,,.._...L.,_'I 41; ' * IF ---- ter+ ..w. * ,ArfG 9'. 71111P-1.17`; `w ,p;j i ,,,, ..,i a; I s r-'4,07 :" r`. ° 1 1�t"1� 1., R nm.. i } ! `�Q J `. ` Viz. 1 i r w w '• 1 - + \ .."`' "', '.-7,,-"2' `; ,;,i}*' rr. 0 1 �t. i* t } ; - -, 1 q *.A. •..; y�.'. "' .,j.,xl Y, }`Rr= 9rr�„ L4:,,s•'xt•d �1 •'L' S ,t r 1 y-. .fit ' .` _A - ` .k ✓" 'V�.-...,'< e, S t x.„ I/ ." r ,.1 efr ;.i 1 : ' ti' .1 •: it*-.../H "..i` „r 41-,.� x xxa ;•r �a rri y } 7Y _ � - �f¢p 1 xlo�,, - r} . *t'-R *. '�, •,;,y ur. ,r '. yam=.;. 36.rs, } ......., „.... 0 t......1 . --, , , ,..kt , :,,, k., s } L 4 c v8 t JI' h � , .Y - - ,,,E ,` , , i"- 't1.1:%1. ,,.._ �,, �' ,1• t .? II : ,%,,.;6i.-,t '4 i. a1 • '1I ..' ``s. r .t -. r gin;I t, t 1 '", `;• ,,�, ,: ,u, „ r> t t. i }� '�. ■ .� s w r.... t `I etanitto • • .1 p� t'� ^.„,/ •—•'1. Ln yh 2 .. .. r _ as 1 Promenade on France-21.78 acres Excelsior and Grand-9.87 acres(not including public way) The Shops at West End-18.87 acres(not Including public way) DJ R Promenade on France 10 ARCM"fECTiJRE INC. C 0 (0 fY (13 C.) 0 06 agar)U116 00 11 Ci) CO (,) E -FaV CL 0 ii•((e 'tromenade on France 6600 France Avenue South Edina,Minnesota r. ,r P, Y -— — .1"„ I- ;''' -. P ,1 4,4114: ,Vaa 1 fp i:. 0 , rY {. �� A cwt 1..' ,J tr,;..� a ( " /t *.'',�' .r 04',;:',,,‘0,10 y P ' �d tee_..- , `i- • i ,�1 '� •..,,r... 1 xf' - s -,� ,ri' 4 a k • I - J 1. C�rtiii) ,W..s 1rfa I.!j 13. ,__,,-217,11''' , xr ^r i � 1,f5C4�37w. gi{� _ �1 _A'. 2.5 mit �x # r` ? ,. tI I .."164e. 4 i .,r.'"'-q.:".._;--r'--V.; i �,' '' • a i C ,• 1 z, . ., ��- ill '1.. '�!t ,6 44 i4. i,,, IIF1,�4+ e '01. JP. ,4 t-(� C' " - !_~.,(„1-,..�� . �L'l _ •---.,.- ,� ,,�t x. ... ::.� _s. .Na+r _.M. .,�may.iC �.;-..'71 -�.::� i� �Jf4 t �f+± 1-� 1� �' ,,Y P�"-it di 11304,-... s6,t u� f �� 1 i t'. �'r-f � ' ,•,;,-,',`•' . �..r1 6i t , )"'11� t b1D' :.rt 1)'•,t, �g9�,'' OctI�; 7,1 _,. � S; .1., " h t.4'. x I ...�. .-_.. 1. ,. _ rb i. ,• a,. Southwest View from 66th and France DJ R Promenade on France 12 ARCHITECTURE INC. L. Area Table:(New) Site Data: Allowable Actual Notes Office Hotel/Office Residential Retail Total(new) Site Area: n/a 948,632 SF 21.78 acres LB 13,160 FAR: 0.5(474,316 GSF) .82(781,988 GSF) 376,708 SF Existing/405,280 SF New L7 13,160 Height: 48'-0" 85'-0" HOD-4 Height Zone L6 25,000 17,000 13,160 Masterplan-Promenade on France Lot Coverage: 30% 21.3%est. Subject to Survey L5 25,000 17,000 13,1605.4 25,000 17,000 13,160 L3 25,000 17,000 13,160 This Masterplan shows new construction of a Medical Office Parking Summary: L2 25,000 17,000 13,160 Building,(2)Retail Buildings,Residential,and Hotel or Office Existing to Remain Required(New) Basis of Calculation EMC Sec.36-1371 New Parking Provided Total Parking Lt 30,000 20,000 13,160 40,000 Office 904 645 155,000 SF of New Otece 500 undergrountl Total 155,000 105,000 105.280 40,000 405,280 SP New that will replace(2)3-story office buildings in the middle of the Hotel 150 125 Room Hotel(est.) 150 underground site that are not compliant with current ADA standards.The Residential 123 70 units per EMC Sec.36-1311(w) 200 underground Masterplan also shows new construction of(3)areas of under- Retail 217 40,000 SF of New Retail 200 underground Total 904 1012 New Stalls To be provided by underground perking 1050 underground 1954 Stalls ground parking to meet the needs of the site. '" Ex�slin Fence Lino 'Existin9 t-en.a ...................................i .......... g , • • R d Ex„ol,'Fol Lino 0 _ _ --�` . -- v d eP141, l g Fo stg a Tree ENstlnove G n C-ll. '• o I 1j 6Os I _ . _ OFFICE Sr •e p6rking ..I- 34 81811s m.:,., 7F \ I, 1 tu co 1 ! '4 r'tcu Park r;7 1 � • U5 Sta 51 I�. w I 9uu �----- L\ -�' ON''' ESIDENTIA 2F - ! eT 8F OFFICE Rho (nm �.% IIs U L_______ L 15o slaws undanrou d _ 6F - OFFICE MEDICAL 54S nils i A„ P d6h Sle o� y� w f � 1 HOTEL or OFFICE \ 6F. - I1 M01 EDICAL w�!q c,p.';li Drop o7 i_ . 6F JLAzA�I (` 2F \ w°' ' 6F vScrrdr Psn 1 AAP l,,u Sf (9 Inns 36 9 1 q d a �l nIl om_ .. I\-���-I 187 Sial?sAbpve Gmund `-, ` ,stoic G.oun. 500 Stalls Urdergrourd • I`I - Mil CG ANK O sl,'s I 'FRANCE s 17a Gil Mp I RETAIL I I w nt MERIC l�ET IL I 2F TAVERN R / . ""'" itootc ...- i ir, ..... 10 i ��_ � wool. I I '' nwll ...a. ' _) France Avenue South - 1 (/ k d III1111 @ - 11111001 = •••• ••,,,,,,• ,�- --• 11111 111111 111111" BANK OF AMERICA RETAIL RESIDENTIAL EXISTING OFFICE TAVERN ON FRANCE HOTEL/OFFICE EXISTING OFFICE RETAIL MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING O N 1F 2F 8F 7F 1F 6F 6F 1F 6F 7490 SF 25,000 SF 105,280 SF To Remain To Remain 105,000SF To Remain 15,000 SF 155,000 SF Under Permit 70 Units Promenade on France 13 �J R ARGreTEGT/Fla INC. , )711711::::.,4 Y.. c i 1— m 4 z m 7 -� .rQ� \ O v N n toNi. l . m mN N / - V 8 — Ill O \ , ,\ al /I AoLL i .,¢ o1 Fi - /I ' /11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I Ii I I I 1 > l i L., i iiN O x.. __ :� < fl D r�r ri I■ I � : IJZ i. EVi s — =\ 2 II ' O. a.-',.01- 52E) a > 3 �_ \111 _ = JIIIII111 y x n a 03 a co N V O a m L „D \ ~ I 1 1 III ■ E :2Y flI e gQ- N = o4 wE o wo d N m z ° m e O c eV- �r= O C `0 IL 6 iWOICc . N '0 w ¢ a' No VV os ' - L.J [O c W N N_z c 0 C C k. cc o c -ti b a¢ N > m 7 It ryftf«a E8N'c-a -10 n N it a o o tm m Q m > N U L c 002 c>m.c n. -1E-23E2 ti`n : cv'�'n oN 0 i 5 `w Promenade on France-Vehicular Circulation Diagram The Circulation Concept of the Promenade on France is to create a strong,organized model of internal and external circulation O Site Entry that displays a dialog and flexibility for future development of the area.This is done by: O Service Entry 1.CREATION OF A BOULEVARDS TO ORGANIZE AND BREAK- DCWN THE SCALE OF THE CURRENT SITE ----- Vehicular Traffic 2.CONNECTED INTERNAL VEHICULAR CIRCULATION 3.CLEAR SEPARATION OF SERVICE ����— r ` IOW aRolt MOW Int 4.STRENGTHENED CONNECTIONS TO ADJACENT I __,ilimi•.1 PROPERTIES ,- t �__ _r_ -...130.1.21... f f _� .------------------ -- _� 4ftvi;. w�#A[Wit! ' I It e l , 1 `T 7---------_-_-____---_ier rote.w -, �t 1La. 1 —�ttw r � s a ��I I I s ��� • O • , 4 7' -,-1:,--„r_. , . '7' V % t b 'd ii i'; _ e f-� (.-1 I �� I�I ' +- '� '�l=�; �j_ii____-\��i��.= / ( it 1 1 :I; • I t -) ,..> . d I e. ® of• ���I aL / ' 1 t It 1® •• •.�• iii I. II4(44.0.# _ ( ; 1 ! i i ie I l D; 1 I's III I I I ilei =1l_._1- --- ' :, E : 'I ,� iI1 I �� I I I_ I u 1 ii --1:,: < ,� �.4 � _� ,�/I e 1 I r I I _ e\,\ Tom— %/ L RIP4 ;BMW 1111111*sinia'-ilaNP mom now mow Raw Rol EiRairmilis . low swr w.�w.ntrr wtr nt�t. . ..w wa.tw tw.aw. .t —tw is -– -- ______._________ _ . . . -11 ii_imp ma was.mow ma o ma mew mat man+: .I—cog mg ow on.um miR o owl weouRR m . .. .—.n .s a raw R.n I)M l.1 1; l(r 4 a 42. N Promenade on France � 15 J ARCM�C'rtlitE INC. Promenade on France-Pedestrian Circulation Diagram The Circulation Concept of the Promenade on France is to create a strong,organized model of internal and external circulation that displays a dialog and flexibility for future development of the area.This is done by: Pedestrian Plazas 1.CREATION OFA STRONG,ORGANIZED INTERNAL PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION O Pedestrian Nodes 2.CREATION OF FULLY CONNECTED A PEDESTRIAN SPINE •-- Pedestrian COnnecti0ns 3.STRATEGIC PLACEMENT OF PEDESTRIAN NODES Pedestrian Spine 4.STRENGTHENED CONNECTIONS TO ADJACENT ="-'-" �`'"': - a PROPERTIESs. r� - i �r --���_ -r.._— ..— __ — 1 ,i, . ' —III I I ____ ___ - - r——— T ,..7_,,, .., 11/ k 1� ��� 1 I --1' _ ,7 ,:, 1 II /01°D 400- r Ir . 9:i ' linl '-ii_ - - ' ' - A - I L r ,- II ' 1' I� 1i -4 - 1 I.;�... Iii 1 \ L* ! I• ill 1 I I 1 rl �� 1 1 1 1I 1. II 1 I (r �. -- --1 `_ t I , .lili l IU 1 I. III I: I; I Ij I I /�( / 1 ,.!' � 1 -- - (L r ;. nig II Hi II II 11 111 ik l # ® ® Vt;T- SN ®J(-� Promenade on France ,■T` 16 ARCHIIECTJREINC. MIL Promenade on France-Massing Model-Site Usage Key Under Permit New Development New Building New Building Existing Building New Building Existing Building New Building Bank of America Retail Residential Office Hotel or Office Office Office Existing Buildings 1F-7490 SF 2F-25,000 SF 8F-105,280 SF 7F-163,855 SF 6F-105,000 SF 6F-198,463 SF 6F-155,000 SF To Remain 125 Rooms To Remain New Buildings Existing Building (2)Existing Buildings New Building Restaurant Office-To be Demolished Retail 1F-7,200 SF Est. 6700 3F-38,596 SF 1F-15,000 SF To Remain 6750 3F-37,380 SF A CM �x -1-1' of --w :,,- t :1'..-',„:::;-. ,u w,x,..,...'''' ;. ter- µ m4 . s5 c* "'7 t"--- ,m't,t ..''&'a^ n' + —''-- e n -- ,:� v^ -+'_ • y '^c ^s.� '''''7%,,,',,,;475';',,,,t4 . `.•^i. /LLiiir • Aerial from East New Building Office Tallest Structure Proposed Height @ 85' ii ii _ 111 L, _ ..__ ._ ._._- 1 11 1 �i. IIII I11� _ _,17,---—_ ,_-_. umwlutmmi s_ ,, , , Milli 111111.1111 tri- il_ '-i1&it f — �� ._o o '.1iii .. -._ I — 'Rig i owl mi _Il n-f.. East Elevation along France Avenue Promenade on France Y'""\�1�'1 17 !V� �R ARCHITECTURE INC. Key Promenade on France-Site Usage Office Retail The Principles for Site Usage are: F&B Residential 1.ALLOW RETAIL&BOA TO ESTABLISH RELATIONSHIP TO Hotel ■ Circulation FRANCE AVENUE _ 2.SETBACK TALLER OFFICE FUNCTION FROM PROPERTY LINE Bank of America �– � Underground Parkin 3.ALLOW HOTEL TO ACT AS A CENTRAL ELEMENT 4.CREATE NEW SITE AMENITIES AROUND AND WITHIN THE SITE — _ / \ , THAT ADD VALUE TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ti \ ili ---- l [ / % 2 Steens Ing - ----- ��r._. / .' �,,- � � ',�" �� SPIYace Parking •, �I � r I O. 175[alls I lI � 64 StalW bove Ground -- OFFICE _ ,;! Surface Parking - / . .:.200 ans Abo�G dnd, - 7F L I, N 1 Ij / ' 34 stalls \ "_ Surface Parking i„,1... �� % /\ / \ _ i 1153 Staff? - / ., II 11 1II1 I11 ' - i ATM DRI _.... RESIDENTIAL 2F - F F TR /% /i SF• -_�/ OFFICE 1. �j '�� C, ULA ONj - - 150 Sta11�Untlerntl OFFICE L; MEDICAL SI• T cg I I trop-Off - -_ ... S 6F Drop-Off ' V / 1 i OFFICE / 1 1 Drop-OffNOTE OFFICE , p 6U1LDING VA> / -� F .._ 1F ' 711 DropO f (/I-, II 1 6F �1.: W 6 ria a Pa p� q 1 (I I' 1 1 / 36 Stall'_ BOO Stalls l4�und [I —I It I I U O p 0 l_ _ PLAZA I g t is bd d III - �� / 00 S al s A _ I. � A�A" 500 Stene Una rground round� 1�1 125 Stalls g 'TAVERN ONI J l If I 1 i ; : 111 ' I eAN o _ T - su oa ra m ' 1 /Ir MERIC t.........iII /; ll' ER -I 11 -j FRANCE I I ul/y1cd Parkin$I PLAZA r 1 i [I i I 'il_iiiill - 1 j �,) ( A_ 1—�-1 A I L1 1 I II I 1 III 1 j I� ���' ----- - n On DJ R Promenade on France is ARCHITECTURE INC. Green Collar Landscaped Boulevard a Central Spine Corner Plaza . f4.: Promenade on France-Site Amenities — Site Wall '11;4: - ,y1,7 v ya -- 'F [I t 1- ` 1 �..— II I _t � �` I •� 6 I 7-ti p i � � 2 d. I'r- I I, , , ` ti Oak Savannah 1` _ - -- F--173-7--71 -7- -- ' � �� III � � i ' :. 3fil 1 y' r'''''",:,rt5 �. a it / f!:aw 1' i 1 IJ_L. _______LII 1 . il iit1 111 _ ___-� ' � � � � � ir , r ,. ` ;l II { ! k _. ., r;.;, �¢' _ I .'J[,�_{L�� m.-.- a,, � r'3 `�t 5.Green Space , o s . € .emt - it, f".,..-. r I. ..we...-' ,' i.. q�,t. 1. '� i a n r - 1.Site Wall 2.Landscaped Boulevard Example 3.Connecting Arterial with Parking 4.Corner Plaza Promenade on France 1.9J� Sketch Vision Proposed Site _. -. 4 _�,,...._,..._:_ •z zee �- r. . , .: ., „,,,..w.,,,,.„,,, .t t.,.. .,,, ,.....„......... . i„,,, ,,,,,,,, , „- , _ . --. , . .„. .i..., . , ”„ , .....,..4 :._. ._ t ^gat 1 � 0� �__1��� rat yam+'= I +v 3- r / R i. r�� { 1 R• pxK�W { M.; ,: �+► Y 5 .1,,,,j)."°. . a .9 1 r t V •+"* t5 J^t .. moo,•waTr . i , d1 t' ri { T"- x ? +. t ".,er w1�' --t � - -ri iR y� :3.! s..1�/'*a as+>�E i .t „,,,,,...:„:".4.:..,,, a` t g �."+k �„4. s d 'T . Wf ' .T i � I. .. «.w..tll�. - a� `ti'- �, ( r 4'1,:tcwtr :z. ►;: "M yiltail s fit, . e � 4 _ 4a ;s::.,,,,C`� a .+M d l ':,;:;$.1,)---.10=',”".. y' "'. i � *' R Xt: J iX7 "" ' < .��j i . f. '.%7A. Ir.,. l fit, 74- ,, , r �.► ,T{� �k. � .;t + �. - . u rV.'�. ., ', 1+ l R�hlilr, ',:, lC' 'atr_ w :1:0,k06,* ."`17: •�}, - { � �5 ! `"a.F ' `,.y it .S .�`:41: 3� ��, ,.. -. � � �, .ar'a�:. �'� �k�� � �'_ { pi t: —^'I� � '4�1� [ �` j f" ., 'fir } •kr •� � yam. _ d� v q 5 ! y c:.,7�T. '_. i 4 y, .4; �'.: �r��Ni�q =` :.;"'"'„ k�`. 'Iii ..n:"ij.g .t.a" � .YG.h "" 1. .a~..m.:y.3 r'1 l et1 1 .zottiik 4� J•i�� s 1- htl ,`Ya ;y--' ;,yt Sketch Vision from Southdale Study(2016) �` k3 '- _.• 'A4�s: E. a.. ri / :...\_,„...,,,,,,111_,Itt t ''C6"• ;� ` t`' N DJ R Promenade on France 20 ARCHITECTURE INC. Comprehensive Plan Integration i- - * P 3 4 r 401. I. � Y�r� . . ,. iti ' a . q,t y '' f 3 fr .V '71. s �,' .Arc w _ ` w .,-. • • a,- arnr� � „ rt Le 3. • "' NFlC! .!'. .� ! �.'� 1 ; r « , & MRCS MFaICAL -..,�... � � b �!: , a ,�? I e :;'1011411,,'Y'' g '�^°"�I t, I, 'Q 'f t�f t1rrI 1' . ,.„,,: . i , r,,, Pi ,. .:,,.„ :: ''''‘i i 1 ! ♦ ttS `r e ! . �I / •. ��Yx' � 1 �1 sww..v I ' q • ry 2. s ate:, prance-:_ Avenue._ Sauth- +.)_ _ _ _ _ ruh:r:.t �. 'e 5 IY.0 c F "I . r r� ,::1!:ir' xi 1. FI * r T �ur J 1 rT1 t. •r ' xL..,.� � 111�;�} Ilp „„ .. , ,,.„... . . �..t. e: r _�'yt_�3• - �-�<K - '� _ •1 of s,Iii . ,l , , ,, , _.,. .:,.,.. ...,,, „... ;: ,, .... .,,,,..„., i f v }'- +° y 2 .,', ,,. "I',Ct ql el4an.-_._ H3 ttt�H�'' , '.` I w, f x`: .,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„....-„,.... w, llt►# ; x Slikl Gfi �� _..i. , ..�.�� %� i ! � ;1.,_.. ; `ti�' -.- Yga � M� ! d u::l t°.-�1 r u.::.a_t�.� ,£::. . '"�,u .�`�.'y�": 3�..._..._.✓K� ;... ._ __ ._..�. _ ;�..' -.. .. 'GIN 4 t $_�*'•... -. � •3 Ir _. 11�- ti_ v `� 1L .- � r 7 Proposed Masterplan Overlay Promenade on France ®J 21 R. ARCHIIEGTJR6INC. Promenade on France 6600 France Avenue South Edina,Minnesota " `'' FY`r_-.--1.-----4.--r-- 1, .•.---;-r_-- ,` L , ""_____-_-_---____---,,--_,s_ � -.-ice _ __-,:-f '� -.17-1,,,,"---, 1 vim,. .�,,.. ^ Y -•-Ii. _ - ""Y' , ., re...«?-+f�-'S<!'-.40'. ..� ... �j `-- ,-,� - I'� ! '` --�� T''' •.. '' i 7 �'} -T _ 411,1.'1'1,., ! n r�,� r-,, ,,t "'-` C,ti. . kra r � 11�I I f � �t ^� i 'fYl-A:+ �' s � - ,7.-,-,,_.--v,....,.,„,4"'r '.a>r11 p in a# J '.,-C3 3 .I. j I 1' rtr •2 r r C f V`n Rt ) "-^ �i r �, r, yf r dddl]] �t � �G I- I I(J 1: �I J�I {-t.. --- � %t4��r I �y it, r om�+r' tI 1 r a � r ,-;is �-�.. .,�` L t'-,Y(Y. r ' '� S'U .-I I .z++� ,� 7 ., g #�`,K"i "`,1W. a h ,.rsY- ^s. -'f.X.- rt'�8 4 • ',a d `/t' el - ',:iF T d:r . ,� ▪ �P- '(,t ..,fr,. .; 1 I� , �-%,,,,,,; t.- a'4 „'+�.Y+„ .7 .� Rt,- " -.` �+&li ° ' ' . - , ' - �r ;, a �•y_ r �T Y ^.�i {it '_ , r '� 3 :4-4,,,,,, a ` dlµ � ' 1 .�.,/ +, • yt�++ x� ^"'Y - ')„ f"1'- '` --- - Vie" c"i' g1-94 �r -�'�'� s t+ r W 4Yt 3\. .4�) �. . w N ,, , ■ • '':-- 'F. -0, S : '�. ff t.', �1r y r rib i..4► y' �, 1G'• �i,, d ' � •k� ,P `hQ+C�/. 'd'�- ,' a . - 1. ,ro g, .0„,,-.1)1111, om+ ���; it. ,. . 40. , SIP`, " ;P i i,,� fir' '#d ,h 1{ "- 4^, / r6 �'� v ' /` b4r. / t°+t.7 / r f? -#i 1 i y a r a'" � r, - �4,eTr ° i ", �54 / 4f�t .. _ Lj Aerial View from W 69th Street and France Avenue -- ___ -- _- DJ R Promenade on France 22 ARCF-0TECiLRE1NC. 411-1 ,Landscape Concept oak Promenade on France 08.10.2016 Promenade on France DJ^ K 23 ARCMTECTURE INC. Landscape Design Principles-Diagram Pedestrian friendly Valley View Rd Improved streetscape on France Ave Green plaza Tree preservation IiiIIIntegrating landscape into surface parking.lots -- 6 Creation of plaza Interior pedestrian connectivity F I NI. Mr) I : 1 Ifrasowszemommosmximassimmi • k0..' .- J ON DJ R Promenade on France 24 ARCHITECTURE INC. Landscape Design Principles-Precedents Pedestrian friendly Valley View Rd , — .., - •,;,,,,.-,ff.i; , ,,...i,-;',,,,,.. 1 . . , w --„..i.,,, --- - ...,---. •--- .4.-:'''''T A - . ,. -„._ . '• • ' if/ --- ' f:e -•- , ,-, ;ifei:Nr"-f;;I. P;;.•';;;-- illi,- ; j" I • ' ''.,.,,--,—.;t: " ,- , '',. ..r... -;*-7 .1!--z-i..,,-- 7.-•., ..,--.-1 • g . ,• .,, .• ..,' 0141 .1 .. ,,- •. , ,.,mii . .4-.. , ,,joiA ,.. 4 .,, 'mg •..,4 - .,-.---; z---- ?"-- , ,. . .--• - ---- . • 4 i -' 1.-,.., .,7"..'-.`,.---;;;--4"--;----,'",--'---'----- -;",.=,-,-.4-i.,-;?,-,-; . , L., - - H .a,--r,,-..--- ''''ir 4----- -. •- :- .--- . --..,_ ---'-- 1-.. t " ....,..-,.. „. v44.--4.t.... .1L.,,,„..--777.- . ..„,,,44,,'I'd R.......•;..,,,, , — .-- — ---0- IS'.s' - .--..":^-., -.0.- - '. ; • t:_II '''''‘elA;,17,,',•irl„,"41.''...,•-;e1 „..- ,......-• • '' - l' ' .-.• ...-.---rTr....."...-`•Th,,=;;-', , , , tie '''''' - '''' ' ' P '''• P •••:,' " e'''' 1 fillialPIE4111111•11V,Iii.WIVI.-1 '. '' )" __ " __ , '-,-• .'',. ...,_1 '.-,-,,,,-- 'E ,,./..141-37.3-/.1#.-n-!?.t.14...'' t L__ ---- '" - .- •. Improve streetscape on France Ave ___. __ - .- - . . • t . ,.--- ,-,... i': Tr,',t•,..,, :: . . ,'..7 V. ..1`1',." C . c ,,,%, • 0 . ,.'• .4 ;;:::;.,...*:. ,,;.:.•.%.:1:- . . . .. _ .... .. . . , . . .. ' I .': :: - ..- .:i.'• i.' -,- ":- • . .- ' • ". .... ,, . -.-- f ,,,fff,lit::;-,,1,;-'7V‘-;".;;; - ..‘' ; - I-'' •• s.le '•,,a,,, . '','''': ,, --• . '' . '-••1 1 •::....e-• " ',4 ''''''''4 i_4...fj;;,iiii'ff f ; '. A .1 -...' L I .,_0)r..i.sity; ,i . .. ... . ,, I '.1'•:‘,.,:-.•4..:,•.,,,-.!'',":ii' 1 7,'L.'' :'..e•t••'"'•l'''''••••'',.,'' .--. - I(1-'• ' MAP 44'7 . '''• - 1 l''‘', •i '.''.','F''r-,' ,• . -, e , ' .., , i • l ,ee' ''S',. , - , , -•' ••••-• -''''j .-.14,••.” ---7•''''''.---•':'•:- i e. 4 f ;;;-;;. ,,-. i. .Ile ..,,, III', ;Ai, , . f,. . . , :.;; 4.-'0-'', •--'7'-,ka- *-, , . ---,-- r„,,..nt.Z..-',..1k.1, , .i 7._ , 7;5:7:-. .,:-.T.,--.-- - . ''-'..---''''''',",t'',---,-' LA) '.fill.".-4,;-- --i' -"1:-5',.":;:NI".",IT ,• .-,..-ti-44*."' ,......„ ,,,,,,,4,:..., i, y,,,..,•,..,....:,-,-.&n,,,,,---,...-.'.•..", .-,„,..‘'''' . -. ,,,,.*" ',,,, . . ••t7,411f, I l., * ' . ,.,,.,,.„ ,. . ..,.'"IP-• - ..,...' "" • ,-, .....-— :i: _,41.1!ie.' — _ . ---"1 *--4..,„ -----• . ...... .....„ , , -•.'pp . • • 111114 411=11.-- , 1 1111 'i''•'' , S...-' ' ,, ' ..,.,.... .,,. .,. , . - . . . . --...... . ----:-.... . •.. -,7'.,- -fotc, ' - - . • . . - '-,- ' 's,. . - , .", -mgr.— -. -- ••''n . . , . i,_ ..,4 -a — ,..: ,.. , . . •e.,;%. , Ill,4'.. 0 ,,,..."f',... . , 1" '4,f„r;,..4„,-3--,-;..,• • , .:.,.. - --,-----,,,,,, --..--- "*' „1' --. ••'', t - %,,* NIC •t ir-*«:' ., w• 4 4k • ' . '' ..-il,'"' '. -.*'*:>":',,. P.* .*_}," ', ‘11L . ., •,,,, . dor. - .4„,. • ..,,,,, • ,. . . ..,*. , .., ".....,,, -4ervoiti.. . ,-;-"ff. . .. ,01i 1 tooro. IV „ ,. .. ..,,. 0.., -1//0,p .40 . • Promenade on France 25 DJR ARCH-MG./1,1E INC, Landscape Design Principles-Precedents , . , __•••••- -.,,,c,.." --;;,1,. :,,,..,,,.. ...L..r.4;,:Z..44,„„..41i;'•:1...;...1,,,•*"..r.,.,.:,::,..:::,?,:,4,...1.414;T .;.:1- ,.i.::,,:'„..',,,,'4:xt:".-'i.:,A.,,,.-.,i:, ''..:, —-----'-- - . ______------___ ------------ Green Plaza ..- , •r• 'r; ` Itlem-.,. ••••1',...*-41••.`-/t.'-1,47';‘.1,:t-14-•.•;71.4.4,' il'A's•,..14,"`-i-40".:7:20•' --rttl,t'''- '- ‘''''", '.CAL 1 ,' 71,7.,-A-":".• -,y.--*•-•• .' .-.41.),I.t.„,1„:„ i-.7,10::,, .1:4,-'•,,..:••,,' ,,,,,IT",• •,:-,,‘ ,..-•-•1' .•,,._• -lei',•,,,,,„:,--i.. ----••••1/4,• ";;;•-'"-ft;- •• i ' I t - , ' • 3 ',.• ..-0:.4'' :* 1 kg, •.1 ,. ,,:ll i...,.,:;**4..". :!",,-;•,,O, 0,-,..:44,tt:,;.-2,. 4, ., ,,...-:,:,,-.:,,-.,.-. ..v . , , - . -A 1 ,LIt1 ""'",,,',. ''' .:*+,..'"' '• L ' '1-!** ,. 1 1;7,4T1,-.`-'•••*".: V. .' •,4*.,r, -":,':'",'-'•' L .. tt 2`t"4*X1'.. .;:y-‘"*",,,,,,,,k,- ''' 't i 4 • '... • * '' i '... s. ' ,...t.±.1..,: ', V'* 4.''... .'.7*"'..''.*"•••••;" - .' ' '.../ --"" - 4e I MI 111,11a. 1 i . •' ,":7'i•...'r"' -' •'-e..."' ' ' ..."4,4 , • - .7.1.;i-• , .., IP- .-,A., ., '''It ' ,' .. 1 I 4 • 4......-4,.' ," I-Z;71",,`''''-' -4.-4‘-'4 Ff.'•"..;. . i 4??'+ '4-A""f."A .-- •••,--4- ' - • LI'", '- ''''- ----LI ' .4;•••41i. 'v . 441:i.,I ;if 1 . - ...,,* . .1+v,.,,; J ••:'-$;.4-:,),4*.:46''• 41".444ittiot,„-, , ,,,,,,,-.'"1, - ,-,.7.,.<",,j........%.-:::,,l. i7,.0,...f..27.1.7,...• '...:',..%.*".,,,,,,, ,,p...-7Joulai.1,;• Lot.,;4:,:::eilitt,,,41, 4.-',.1...,.!,„:".:1444. . iii,,,,,• •..-4 •- ,, . •14,,t ' , ' ...0,. . ' •• — t. ''' *'4'44 v +11‘ )4. r giliVitv tf-'-- - • '7,........,. - -.,--'v.. e.', . .• " I -1 ,.., ',___,..6.11k--,i4Fr;:, 7..-.' *•,*,. . -''•• --40e,,,,,"41-"\. 'N' °* 4', i .,..c...,7:• i • . , - . -„77,-- ..... . ,, , 1 , a Or I - 4., . R - # ' '''''''",,°4 "e! ,,IIWt' . . . .• ti # -- ' -'CRS I ••,. • ."• •• •••v„-• ... • 7.1'4' .".‘ y , i e '. L C 111.11 '..,‘L'Ak to ,, :.7111111675q,t Iri , ,•.7• -'''•••- - , ft-..,,, '1.4014e-'7.-• ''''••• -.1,...... . ' . I ' .1;' _,IJ•ri ' ''' - r' ' " '''''--7--'-' ;/--* ' ''''.' ''..?..rt4-*:. .,• '''!".;',4!t?oat.. --"I ' ' .. - •. t7•'? i.e -,mi, .----- ----''' - ,,....4,..., v, i ---...___v_-.•.4,..,,,_ ,., _7 ._.-- : 74,• , •-. ,:"• J.-. ...-.** ...-*"•,,,:4 ;•.1*44."..'..- ...f.,•••4;:,.'`.0. ,T.-7'.,'",:.• 1 .„ , ,,:r2- '.,-.-4, -.'":7-- •,',,0 ok: -.J'.,.,-,.. -•." 'Ir,„;,',...,1, ' •ir . ---, - ,,,,,,Ardirke-,. , •,,,,4,,, ,,,,+:00,-, .' • 0 ', ,/..,-, '- ' 1. ' .,° d ' ',0404. A';',. --'"''• ''7 ' . .:.Y.r.fy•s,:• .i'',''•...ii, •."' -, ., •::,..;.,,,;": 4- ; Ili k- • .k. 4 '..'''' ,'. 'V' ' ' '. 1444' ',, 40',J1,'- -'F'-1 -_-..,J „ ..,.,;..„ :, ,,,4,,.,z:,,,,, .,,.;. ,,. „ .-.,1 .:•••i•-••.1/,' ,,,..-.,-•p,,,,•„4„,),,,,e-%SI,;',IS. "k .;i ''' . _. - • •,,,,70 5 ,,,' " 0,' • -____ 1 4. •-01-."'-'1,•, '•vrir •, ...# ,.- ,.. i• ' • - 'fc -1 :',41.7, ''',.1;,,,,i' 1,•'.•1,', , ',„•,At,-- --,,- .144,.... , ' .., -1t014.• .'-' 14. ••.,''',1 .. :-.1" , ' ' , ' •k4k,/t* , . ",1, ".•.. • /- A1,7 •It• ..4•-• ' ..., ..* $147 •-• "*1 44"-,, 449- `I`•••"',,e.•' ! ' ..., ? .-s. - , ".•°,, ...". -••••• '' . .1 ,• • 0. ' ;Jr., „, • s. . ..0,) -I%•', ,,,t, 4 IT ,.- : .4%. ,,,... ,.: , '.., . '' ' ..... ..„....-4,4.4..„,,, , 4 li., - -*;* . . ' ':. ;... b., •irr:.);-,. *14,.&t,„. 1 ',, -'.,•..'.. Ic,1 -- L'11.11 -- ''' 'ule.A.,44...x . ', ' • - ,•,',01. • ‘ ?.- . ' c.... ''',. ' c '‘.. •' ',!.. ; ,L., .' ' -.'- •t • 4.'.....• -,,,' 2,:, ., . . ..„,4,!;',, ''..4-,..4 •Ti? * ." ,I'," '• ••:.: ; • .-,(.• '"I.• i• '.-''•' 7"4,;.*;* ',. '''' '',. :5";* '../*. \'',;t4tc, • •• 41 -•• . ••••:. kir-- .• •• ..„ •••‘. 1 - . • ;" :.4 a 5....,./c• '-' ,.. ..., _ . C *- ' 1.404,... I i•74.-1, ' Atf.'",l'r.•.:::4 ' *"•"' * ..' ' ......k .'' '. , '.' • - '.'',i, *:' J. :• l'',.. • ' ••,' ')•' 1 il .•-•r-, •. ,- '•• --S4- , . •-.,• - .. .‘• "-'' . - 4.• *••• .' '• - ' - '''' 4" 'I + „ 1' . ••'"* H... 3'/10.11.,. 21.4.1.*•'t 1 ;11,.&*1 .' If* '* ',..•1 ' ':•..%1II • '- ''T II' ' . -'..t 'i I'.''' •'''''.4 ' - ',;;., ; • • Fir IV t.,,,,, iii Itt ,,,I1_$.2.0i,-.;1; ... :_".= *I, Nit--- _ ,,,,..-„, , -, A': ':„4'. • 1 A .•%•-• - ..1; -,,...,At': .'--. , . z.' .. ,;,...itc4ir ,0,-1-^ ".".',11,:WI''....•-,, .. • -.- .. 1 lx,,,,' ,' ..-'; ' -'- ' . I ''1 ' ' 1 •*,- , AIN ' l 1 ' 1 . .1 :i Af ir ,• ., . -.• , , 1'.: _ _ - .,, ,i'•-54.- • -" . ....-:„....M./ .. I ti„'-'f.. '', , - - ,..,,., . ... .4- '- ,1,-'"%•,. , akifi.'' ‘-.1„_____... v. ...ia tii,t,d, .,' , -... ' .'t. '7. - • It - ' " l'''-1' °yr '• 4;'LA-. /.. --7.... '•'• " • I. tr. .-."*.'"• ..4,' - ''', • • ,- 't.'1:0,i..441 ,•.... „r„e, ,!: i. ,..__ _, - k.k...:- - - • ' --•.•41' .,,,,i,1 i I. 1 - -,..,,, .. . ."-..? 7. ,,-,,,,. --...,,,_tt-3,_ or.,dr,',41 5.,7•r• ."1„.';'' ----77.••••-- \ •I'lk4iIrkr '''r. ''Atk". t '' . :4,-Ik••,,.•;, *,''•.. .'7,..: •'„ .. -- It '-'!"'40 "*.s ...' --:- . r •+, '', ,. 1.,f; ', 7, •,, ..: •ft...„„ ','. .,i, „ ,, . 4, „,, •4•.1.- N-•''‘'•v: '444-4' v e:....-.-""'s ,-, ..- • ,'4'.:';ft,'','-.7.*4 ..ti -'' ' .''',',.' • -. .... DJR Promenade on once ARCHITE.011,E INC. Landscape Design Principles-Precedents -.,,, ---. -r-. .--4- -'' - ' 1.7 i. ( --;.4-.''. -:• • r. - -1,.Z.r, -4,- ' "A' -v 1.` .-"' -N.,, ,,- .- • -., .1 .._ - - , .......,•,.,„• • Tree preservation -i: : t,V • :.-„,. e' ,'.....,;.r..-4,,,Li, \‘'-'..,,,‘..... 7.,'..._'.!....-pi-i,i4,.. ..r,r..' --,.4,14-. "tip' ,`f...! :Ili .•-- --0' - „,,,--.--, --.---; - -0 . 2....,..,... ',.a .• ,..,.A. ,...44 ,1,-..-,- k .k..,•4.....,....--,i 0,41,,..; .-''.‘'t A ,:.,., <.• '. , - t'' r ,]-.' ..-.' .."-N,,,'S „„„,.,"''`.&-,..,..4,71.'" ,, .• , ,, .-• .. ,..-,A X-... ',-,s, ".- #,A,A,,, „...41/4_,..S, A, ,,,... , , ,,.,, -P., ' '- - -'''' -`' ,'t.*t.''Eire i I 1 ettOtrt ' ..40,01, *V v',4' 'VII 4 1 --..' • -..t,k- '12-''' -'-''(.19-'0'IF, • $P1 • ,:,•"• ,•; ' ,'. . ,:;-• -- ' .,41 '.lif ilia ,.;' ' ' •• ,o:'' --. .', , •!". •••• ' ,,,,. .,.: -.•.••,'•', - ', • A 4 .., .4,-;a4 ,. . .,,,,, "4. ,,,,.., - .if ..1'.—.7.."''.4;ii. ..'. '1. ' ' ''''•.1:1, 4`,1', ,:i50; i''''':''.'''A''-';'6i:604t:te' .4 - 12 •'' *,'.-' 4 s. -' .'-'4' . '' -:,"%tit,-;•:./i-e:'1,,ja. ......*i: ,.:141t4 ft 4* -..."' 4r.1-'''!Ot,1,,Ht4 ' . te--... , - • :i4'`'''',"t ii./3-44.i 'f:' ".' 44.141,'l'.4r 2 '1' ;:1--: _ - 4 • ., '.t''.('' ? 11 k ,',•,-,,,,*'''„,?lirliVo ••,,.., --„*I.:••••;.'..;---:- ----4..-_-. ' • -- --" '- •.; '-'-'-'' 1---.-7-0'. t i'0",'''.„.-,1!'",*_ ._:',. ":„.-i-:- 1-"-r'-' '''' '74041,4.'..'.:--,-.!''''''..,!..!! '','•°,''.....• - '4.-..• ,, i--•. .:-. , •• ,•111 ,:„ . . '' '.-z--,--- -- 7 '- ''-' '''' '''$0,4P-7"... — .. ...• - " :•-.64'*V. , _ 1__,JAI *1 *r 4.21-;--- --,.. ;4..;•."..:•T!r!"-.--,:::*.•--._____,..:---!`,..-•-----..-','- 7`.._..;-•,-,..• .., ;-;-,t,-,.., _. _ L'.. .," --,. :-.-. , 7.T, ,...y.4.7_,...„. ,-...„..-_-**-r'•,---, -•-. . _ - -.,-.7.,.. ......,, .• — _ ---,,,_-•., ....- •••.- • . 2.....,--. -. ..,...;40%*-4,,,-,.....„„,„-- ;3. --,„4.1....."_--___ q... .. ; --ff,•,-,.-...-41.t_'.! '' '''''.- ;_.•-'''''.---..., ---V.7.,,,,,Z.,7' .r ' "i' ."4 -4," -, ;4Z".' .'16"'"" ."......'„ ',..r.,",-- 4,,-'.., ' ',..i TA,,Ir''....-,...- - - ...... •-•., •,-. -,, '-- -'-.-.:41«,.r... " - : '.• t-— .-. . , ' ' • ° ' ' '/: *-1 • ,"''•....,."' , t . - - II ... .. . -7,1)101 ..... -, . . , A . :, , -,,, .7+;(ii - .,;;..5---.,:;,,.,--',. • iv ,.....) i ,...; 4.. la...:„..;.., , ,i;,,) 1,.4,.,,ri 1 i ._ .-",,..,,,,,:, ,. :,...,:r .. . . ., I-',4,'we,,‘.‘"I'1,...i.i. - ,_ ,r1 .' *'. ., '...",-.-c-P.,... _ ----r 4 •1-•4 u . i..• •-•121- -,_ .•„. ,. ; .' -1M11114 , ,;,,,, ,, ;r, . -1,;...,..,11.„ . -- - --. •-• ...... -...• A.,. .;.' , 1 4'- .41' 'r'' ;ini4.„...1i.q.,..y. ilF '1;",-411101P '''t. 1!).4, '''t^4•' -",—.',,,,f,, .,t. ,II —-. .'t • : '• ,,,:,j ..* '-_,-.. .-.._!Of,*'" - '' ',.•°,41,,I:i;4k.„.sit.,,. ..-c:Ac ,- \- . ...-...1!fr -'- ' ,f".77'. -.-?0- ,i.,'t:• ' '''' ..•-4f'' 1 „,'-;›,‘!-•. ',e'l'e.„ •-•:r,..4. -.1`r :',"t4i3j4,1-1.7-..r.0'`.. l' "......" , it;/./.7 I • '-',3* ' - ' .-,'-'-- . 4 " * *,::*:„.:.,..),,,„„ri,,,,_,....,,,,t4s.\‘;.1.,,,f2s,.iiy:,,,,,-,•,...1, „Iir. ... ,...,°,,,..„ ,'_, .,.:-.7.,.,Ix- .4,f,i,r-e %;:4?.,f44:-Mik. ' ' 'II Ar , ,1 ri• -4frA,*-,,-=,---...,i; ""11,A*0.... ',...,.:..1::'',«I-4,.'1' -,4''""....A." . ,''" get r , '`.,..!'r• '*"'4,,,,(."..,,,,m,'W 4,3• -„„..,- - . ,- _ , • , ,,., ...:___ .-----,_ ' . ' "*. - .* l*C*4$46. ''`"• '''. t'' ' '.,, • :•:• # •.‘ '' ' ' •***A -1*- -.... ....• •-•,# "- •-..••••%.,,Vs..„, ..• H'i'..' "' '"-- ,••• ..111104...., ........ ,. Le' .._ .,. ..- _ 7.3 ***V— :•* I- . Integrating landscape into surface parking lots ,2":17-7401 , , -7 4- ...* ?`'. 1-• . --% • .r. . • , . . ----.—_,.- . - 4. • ' • ' - I - - ili - - II' , 1111 d 1 . ' ,..; 'HI i I ' ' —7-- “„._.- ., ,. 't”-- • -*-' ., ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Z Aiti ,.,t_ •. - - - - wr • ,_.1- ;-------- - oppopi•-• , , 1,A ,, , , t '', ' a , ' * ''' Promenade on France DJ R 27 CO 120 D E 0 —.)u a Civil Concept Promenade on France • 08.10.2016 Promenade on France 29 �J F ARCHITECTURE INC. Topographic Survey 17 i r(,I i� YO o'xalYati r...«=a.nnn_. j ..._.v.__,,.._..— _.ski II;14gii{t,(i {I. P Ya• 4irm 'r!i;i @;'1.`t� ss iP ,{el i�f(! r , „•I !I(S[sl i ! g 11.I 7 i + r I' 7 {°iri • !'° if {IMIIIIr rr{{rar r r @ 11x11.1i{!1II li,!!�I ,"y ICY I1'r;;r 1) i� 11 117x6 91 4tikiiillri r(=t I!{'R pit (p I!{;'! \i ncairiorC;(p i't 11{ 1i1 r N{i r i 11 II r �# j t {t, I'{ ,\ {Irl{!(G1!(� ( f 11 iu (i 1, S! fl THDALE -IN_:z1 if Ht !i{ II II i I('1 Rha 1 f;i1! !,15 st scu 1jf1 F (1i)1 1 1 k 1r 6 Ii Cl 7 111 4i ri 4'A ,4 Itk i lH 4! !1 ii ° 1 f tIll1 10 os r:.....{7 iC { ii E I.i i!i!I H !� s. v 1� ss y --�I ''_- I a r`-„,„r lii rri 1i 1(ii H(7 !■► /i1 _' t I t. „— r.-- ii. f`iia.I • '{f'{,f!° 1i1 {�iiipH11r�I �, `- `• a `' �'j 1- ” ' ' �s` ks'Y !r ♦ G . � � a, . ,,,Ink.... •�� :17,...0.11:14:1: I e7 , J -a P° i i;1 r tiff J { ( $9-L.Y.a.,.ity.ij 11. '> !�II� LSI LJ 9 a+7 �\ '_'- ! !►Z7 a�r< '`Id ,r. I1 Oi „�_ u� dllli i 'IIIIIII . �� s1 IN rZ��' �N,c---4'1" ,‘„ n 4/Air g41 f1r{)rd I1 \� J�/� ♦'.� I'II'�I� I 1&IIkIY�a L;^ 4 C i ♦ e i8 per, S ��t• ^_- �`t� 1 „,U t 4,1I.,tWeir ill z i, /f/p//``e' fT H1T�T�l-f H Iia r ^�P.: 11�lf!—�� 4�`� • y1'A.....,...„..,,..0,`R'• Y1° '�`Y`��'\��� A f i,.Itl�!{�i11{fi4f7� � 0 /'�) �l � �G ���� d='D� S AY � � . °Ii1'f S t ill el(( _ //� I ., 1, ! I i le� ,..4.,„„iiit., a.�a>B !i, ✓^� 'tii{{if' {r �\ � F „ It' �(— �t .(lI i - )q tR� M C(r'7 i -� 8; ICS 1 :!. .111 I•hl 1 4 .. .- • ice- ' — - � ..- 1!cif;!; g ;-_\ � , ' ;[N1' III- fH 111-0 i� I4! ,I� :.: ' ( � >r,.� ': '6t • ,., ,' ------"' -f,.. A i+ � ; r.,,,:;,,, _. ;< 811EI� }N�}EHf4HfIIJf #IH rU [III I ,� ra Ii i'i I ter. �[ 41 1 t lit 7 4 _ u�e�a u �me��► — I1 ea I. nur i 1 �h L { s Lill �It .jJq s \p i1'5° �°"� ,�L','� I l lI i I1 1, `11,01111 It{ c� '�'_ I '''' rt ��w� �Q='+3e P v 6 ��Z� �.�.•�.. . 'I I ill C• ,1. a .y1 • P :rf ii i(' y i I r � �� riA iii ,,( ��+�1! wI _ ��y('J/; • dP 5 7i! 71% __ __._ms -._ .�' I 1 i„ IMO= 4�'` " -TA— r;-1 _ Y ii77 7�. i ii 1 �-- 1 I — i "_I -� per: —fG�r_ ��i� --`_ Li 111 ' 1111 1 J PQQ 1C SLRVEY NOTE CONTOURS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE ADDED BY BKBM ENGINEERS FROM MN/TOPO AND WERE NOT PROVIDED BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING. (� �I—t•N DJ R Promenade on France 30 ARCHITECTURE INC. EXISTING PLAN SIAM, yRIP[1CFU PLAN WI..5 y% Z tom.SNER - - , —--— 80' 30' 0 60' 120' T-- mo SCALE 1'-V 0 Grading Sketch Plan I I 1,741.1.41n ,aA.St AB �"_.. V ag I 'n .`r �.. 614 ' - f✓�I' tr .� • WI , ift ml�atit 11• /;— � _ ' r* �.. .�, \ // ,/ ./%411011r AA\C:i IF--' — i ,/01, ____, ,\ c 2 1 \/,,,,<-' ' ,C ,,,,'''''\\ ,.. 4 7 k 1 1 ii. ,),/, /...„- 1 1 r.osrox ,' 27;;;;4'"7".7:::::::''' 11111111"M '''... .''.-M-.4111117;"'"":;"\\..,,, \:,,,,,, '' / -.1,?....7 * * Ai_in.,, , 1 v nmonN ', � F%. no n Milw,�� nmxe ex mr ? El 41 I IV ► i . . �_..� \ �‘. ..%,p;- i4 c�11111111111 I I I I I D a . . Alia, mno , OR_ tt �$ °a4 i.., l n`rm+ui i 1 I . G: y... ` !- Li".. MIS�� I _r .. 11111L a 11 I 111 • }. �. _ L_ .^ 1 '. I ._ ,,,Pot. '.ROAD I —NO-_t7t �1 z FRANC '�'J (— GRADING SKETCH PLAN ''...''.... Promenade on France 3 DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. - • arnur.BLM_� flOPO TD PIM SNACK `iz _ 80' 300 80' 120' METER64.14 --_- R —''— S AC LE 1•-80' SW .rR 3---11.— • Utility Sketch Plan KNORR°.", ,Tinl I I on! Ii I ;L. 0 vs , ! y„ 'ME.... 40 y W -J' t� VALLEY "• a_.. y �.^9' �� _ �r :m•m.wr urns ¢n �� ■I -.�...,_. "_ :. , ~ f / •• ��+ ' ... .n...,o. n.,.-- `I I 4#4 y F N H �dlOill/ll�•� ,10 N H r II I ! ��� R"""!IU `� / ..,; Ill MOS 1. ►-1• a a,` rum W 14.1:447 li �i 1 = � ��.� ft >b U l�ldd�p ,IY1Nfl, 111 ......i ��� <.. f ,� 1 �� 1111 _ �� /; v 311 rTu ■ ~m 40 �1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIl • , .0 ,' , 1 - - __ '',IMI if , RNR_la 0 r � � 1 mElm I I I I I I _ r I I J 3Y i MOS D L DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIID — CIF 1I �i► 4 F "'' I I mmol I l r l I R C �t. i i I imam I I _�� 'lam \ ,1 HI unuiiiiuin iiiiuuiiiiuiiu iii? �� r r l l _� .. �..... 1 1 30UTii ��,j� I FRANCE--_-4r" +:W VT! f SKFTCH PLAN DJ R Promenade on France 32 ARCHRECTUREING. `Appendix A - Phasing Plan Promenade on France • 08.18.2016 Promenade on France ®� 33 J ARCHITRE INC. U O _ • M W w • —_—.UU2IU _._ - y ,.- O L. O --,-.6i LL a OLo i hf� ¢ ti W -.' 0 11, CII m Z a. ii; N cqw d w __-IY H. tila ti0 et P., a crH S' CL " W U LL c 2 cc F s u) U _ W U N O a O 2 14 LO 00 a 0 '1 Qm S Z. d , U W W c o 14, 4 m 2 p v g~cc S .E -- W I- W - 0 4 S.1 Lu U O Y. E ^ ' 2 LLL LL_ W l i } „:.. Ix cr ', W Q'- N y W 4 co c e-.._--_. '.- W� .:c ca unr d YlN x- - wo cM a a rt o W �_ c W o y E c co N J w E E LO O a .x u.,N p G �s a: 1 N a-'-. Ya O ;5 8 we v t., c z W 41 wm ca a Q,a�rna Q ti m S. k _ a 0 c C ¢c c 2 O . oma, Q 3 N c'o co s' R N N N � 3aa E w ma 1 ip O O b0 U ' c c,„ �'�/ 5 It W un �-P Lu S aai m o ce N m L EQ. 43 QL m a an Thank you OILDANIERE DJR ARCHITECTURE IRE. OF/DAMON FARBER BKBMt ENGINEERS - CITY OF EDINA MEMO w 91�11�\ e .iviln El. •!��Rt'O3i SAO• BBB Date: August 24, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Charter— Comprehensive Plan Background Attached is the Comprehensive Plan Charter, as drafted by Chair Platteter, and presented to the Commission earlier this summer. It has been formatted into the City template. Also attached is the previous background information, and some new background information on density throughout Edina that the planning commission should start to think about as we enter into the Comprehensive Plan. Staff will provide three ring binders for the Planning Commission to keep these and other documents organized during the Comprehensive Plan process. Staff and Chair Platteter will bring the proposal to the City Council in September to ask the Council to authorize the beginning of the Update. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 w9l City of Edina, Minnesota &(t;) �11- Planning Commission • cn 2018 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update Charter •4ronpo =,,9• /899 Project Overview The Planning Commission will assist with the creation of a Planning Commission led Working Group to guide and assist in the Edina 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. The focus will be on the City's anticipated areas of change identified in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, along with Met Council's required chapter updates. The Planning Commission led Working Group will create a process and an outline for the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update. The Planning Commission will define the Working Group and the proposed overall timing of an action plan. Process Successful completion of the 2018 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update is the result of an extended effort by a number of parties. In Edina, key contributors to the process include the City Council, Planning Commission, the Work Group, City Board and Commissions, Residents, Consultants and staff. City.Co ncil i Review and approve Call for action and the 2018 provide direction on Comprehensiv-,• . , Staff project scope Update for sr;. Serve as technical resource ,.. , to ` C. ca '' Manage consultants Coordinate meetings ��' Coordinate ;' 0_;Il r. COAL t."SS Q&" a c)4,x ona• a c_ P; „.„,,, , Work Group 1 Comprehensive Plan Working Group (CPWG) Membership: The Comprehensive Plan Work Group serves as a Working Group to the Planning Commission. The proposed Planning Team membership for this project is: • Planning Commission (nine members, plus two students). • Two City Staff Members (will serve as liaisons to rest of City Staff). • The CPWG will hire consulting team(s), as needed for specific needs. • CPWG membership to be confirmed by City Council. • Will need CPWG Chair and Vice-Chair appointments. Member Responsibilities CPWG should be committed to advocating for the process over individual preferences. Members of the CPWG have the following responsibilities: • Advise on best methods to achieve the update, taking into account revised policies made after the last Comprehensive Plan Update (e.g. Living Streets, WooddaleNalley View SAP). • Advocate for the broader city visioning process and plan. • Advise on the overall project timing, and public participation events. • Liaison with new and/or in progress Small Area Plans (SAP'S) for areas identified as potential change areas. Anticipate 1-2 CPWG members would align with each SAP. • Work with other City Boards and Commissions for their in-put, it is anticipated that a CPWG member would be main liaison with the individual Board/Commission, along with their usual city staff liaison. • Lead or assist with the coordination and facilitation of public meetings. • Advise on the best methods to achieve public participation in the SAP with the focus of local area stake holders. • Help to identify issues and concerns within the SAP area. • May lead or assist with the coordination and facilitation of public meetings. • Clarify themes from information gathered during the public input process and ensure that focus reflect those themes. • Brainstorm solutions when conflicts exist between neighborhood goals and larger community goals. • Present updates to Planning Commission after the public participation is completed. • Ensure that projects remains on schedule. • Present updates to City Council during various stages of the plan update. Comprehensive Plan Focus Areas The vast majority of Edina is already developed so overall land use and zoning is not anticipated to change substantially, if at all. The, goal for the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update is to concentrate on the Met Council's required chapter updates and the anticipated areas of potential change as follows: • Valley View/Woodale (Complete) • Southdale Area (Phase 2 complete soon) • Grandview (in progress) • 70th & Cahill • 50th & France • 44th & France 2 Meeting Timing/Public Information Each of the SAPs will have one or two public input sessions as part of both the SAP and the rehep ComP nsive Plan Update. In addition there would be two general Comprehensive Plan public input sessions. The individual Boards/Commissions may also have public meetings for their particular chapter updates. It is anticipated that scheduled Planning Commission meetings (and/or work sessions before the meetings) will be the primary CPWG meeting times. Process and schedule will be publicized and meetings will be open to the public. The City will provide a media/communications plan to in support of on- going information dissemination. Project Timeline The City is anticipating a timeframe for the project as attached. The ultimate goal is to have the Comprehensive Plan Update submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review by December 31, 2016. 3 .... / ----c-:Ht•I, A.4,--i-N, CITY OF EDINA 0 .... .4 . Comprehensive Plan Organization I,! Comp Plan Work Group (Planning L Commission) k , I111 1I,! si Consultant for ., CPWG Individual(s) ,I I, CPWG Individual(s) Comp Plan 1 & City Staff Liaison 1 Publication & City Staff Liaison . 1 11 11 . , .A , —-, ,,- •.,. i City Boards & Small Area Plans „ Commissions (Park, Consultant(s) for .; ,.. ,,Ii (Southdale, 44th & .' etc.) ' q 1 :i Small Area Plans .; 1 1 h France, etc.) CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINAr�, .,;(12 I®Ivt Q. .ah Comprehensive Plan Organization — Example of Assignments lite`" 1'1 Comp Plan Work Group (Planning Commission) M 11 Mike Platteter & Mike Platteter & 11 Mark Nolen i Cary Teague i Transportation 44t" & Consultant for Commission France 44th I' q & France i I Small Area Plan 1 ii i Small Area Plan( ) _ CityofEdina.com Comprehensive Plan Update DRAFT 01-14-16 Edina, Minnesota Project Schedule for staff and consultants Track/Task Description 2016 2017 2018 IN ion 11111111 Communications �������� Project Mgt and ���� ' ����� 1: Project Start-up, �� Track P 1 9 a Task 1: Project start-up,Task Force formation I'',' , , i Task 2: Mtgs between Task Force,City staff and consultants Task 3: Liaison with Dist. 5 Met Council Member and Sector Rep. , Track 2: Review of Prey,Work/Inventory/Assessment Task 1: Review previous comp. plan, Met Council system statement Task 2: Interviews with key stakeholders Task 3: Assemble background data Track 3: Public Engagement Review Process •fission Task Force 19 ; y 4.` Task 1: Mtgs with Planning umm ( ) ��� � , �� � �„� " , Task 2: Mtgs/Community Forums(SAP planning)with public(12);focus groups ■ I Task 3: Mtgs with School Districts Task 4: Mtgs with Planning Commission(7) until '�''-"" • -: Task 5: Mtgs with City Co (7) U Task 6:Web Site updates; media briefings • •••_•• MEM. •® • U11111UV ,. Track 4: Develop City-wide Plan Components III Task 1: Intro, Background, Existing Conditions;Vision/Goals Task 2: Land Use and Urban Design element Task 3: Housing element Task 4: Heritage Preservation element Task 5:Transportation(inc.Aviation)element Task 6:Water Resource Management element r Task 7: Parks and Open Space(enc, natural resources)element Task 8: Community Services and Facilities(City Admin., Health, Public Safety, Schools, IT, and Communications and Marketing)element Task 9: Implementation Program(Official Controls,CIP, Hsg Imp.) Task 10: Draft/compile Final Comp Plan, inc. Exec.Summary Track 5: Final Products and Review Process Task 1: Review by adjacent cities and school districts(up to 6 mos.) 1 I 1 1 _1 1111 Task 2: Review by Met Council(up to 120 days) 1. I . L:.-:' Task 3: Final Public Hearing and Adoption by City Council 1 Task 4: Complete final Comp Plan document(print and digital) 1. 1= CITY OF EDINA MEMO � City Hall •Phone 952-927-8861 �,9�A, Fax 952-826-0389 •www.CityofEdina.com O � . "it.f t44yA 181 Date: May 25, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Re: 2018 Edina Comprehensive Plan Update Overview Information and Background The Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act requires local units of government to submit Comprehensive Plan updates every ten years with the next update scheduled for 2018. The Met Council reviews the plan amendments to determine their conformity with metropolitan system plans, conformity with adopted plans of the Council and compatibility with plans of other local jurisdictions. The City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan is a public document that describes a vision for how th community wants to develop over a specified time period. Edina has always been a community that has recognized the importance of its past while preparing itself for the future. From its incorporation in 1888 as a milling area on the banks of Minnehaha Creek, Edina has evolved to be a model among municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. It has been an innovator and leader in many ways as evidenced by being the first Minnesota Village to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance in 1929, construction of the Country Club neighborhood in 1924, establishing and upgrading the 50th and France commercial neighborhood starting in the 1930s, opening of Southdale Center in 1956 as the nation's first fully enclosed, climate-controlled regional shopping mall, development of Centennial Lakes and Edinborough, which have become contemporary models for the integration of commercial and residential land uses. Edina has achieved these and many other successes as a community in a number of ways. One of the key attributes of the community's success has been the interest in proactively preparing itself for the future. A key element in preparing for future success is revising and updating Edina's Comprehensive Plan to reflect and promote Edina's vision for the future. City of Edina• 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO � '4ig � oe O Vision Edina In May of 2015, The Strategic Vision and Framework or "Vision Edina" was adopted by the City Council and was based on the previous Edina Vision 20/20 planning work adopted 15 years prior. Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that helps our community understand and guide the important decision-making that will impact Edina's future. The framework lays out the key issues identified by our community, which we need to be focusing our attention and resources on, over the coming years. Vision Edina serves as an important foundation for the City's Comprehensive Plan Update. Metropolitan Council The Metropolitan Council regional planning effort now identified as Thrive MSP 2040 has specific Plan Elements that need addressing in Edina's Comprehensive Plan Update. Local plans are required to include specific content areas. Those new requirements have been added by the Council since the last Comprehensive Plan Update and will need to be incorporated into Edina's 2018 Plan. Many of those required elements are already in the current Plan with those new Plan Elements for 2018 highlighted after the following list of current chapters within Edina's 2008 Plan. The Met Council provides local planning handbooks for all cities and municipalities under their jurisdiction to assist in Comprehensive Plan Updates. The handbook for Edina provides specific and tailored data and information on demographics, housing, current land use quantities, future projections and more. The handbook will be an extremely useful tool, providing basic data that can be easily incorporated into the Update. In past updates, countless hours have been spent by our consultants and staff compiling this data, working through the projections and making revisions. Time and money will be saved by having this data available up front. Update The Comprehensive Plan Update is an update of the existing plan that responds to changes within the community that have occurred over the past 10 years. It is a review and restructure of portions of the existing plan to better reflect community vision. The Plan that we have is a working document that needs updating, not totally rewritten. It is the time to determine what remains valid, what needs updating, and what must be added. It should be noted that the majority of land use within the city is zoned low density single dwelling unit district and will remain as such. Some areas designated for change identified in the current Comprehensive Plan including the Grandview and Greater Southdale areas are under study and are anticipated to produce plans that will be adopted as part of the City of Edina• 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO 02.glyt,$ � O •`ycbA0..::t``O• Comprehensive Plan Update. The Valley View and Wooddale Small Area Plan was completed and adopted into the Comp Plan in 2015. Study areas outstanding that need consideration in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update for Small Area Plans are the 44th and France, 50th and France, Grandview and the 70th and Cahill areas. Current Contents of the Edina Comprehensive Plan: • Community Profile/Demographic Background • Land Use • Housing Element • Heritage Preservation • Transportation • Water Resource Management • Parks and Recreation • Energy and Environment • Community Services • Implementation The following is a list of existing elements in Edina's current Comp Plan and an indication of those who may be responsible for review and updating content: Community Profile/Demographics (Community Development/Planning Department/Consultant) • Review and update population, housing, employment trends and challenges and build on the Met Council's Local Planning Handbook information regarding demographics, housing, future projections, Community Profile, etc. Land Use (Planning Commission/Community Development/Planning Department/Consultant) • The Land Use section needs to be updated to reflect current land use and add all new Met Council required Plan Elements. • The updated plan needs to reflect Edina's attitude on future growth. The majority of Edina's land is fully-developed and will likely see little change. Edina needs to grow and change and shape that change to better meet the demographic changes it will experience in the coming two decades. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO k s c,— it o . c-i,' Bo :.,:",,,,,,, • Specific area plans need to be included (44th and France; 50th and France; 70th and Cahill; and Grandview). • The Southdale Area Planning Framework and Grandview Transportation Study will need to be adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan Update. The Southdale and Grandview Plans will need to be done in conjunction with the work on the Transportation chapter. • The goals, policies, and objectives of this chapter should be reviewed and revised to speak to overall livability and the desire to have Edina be a more full service urban community offering life- cycle housing with walking, biking and transit options to a flourishing business community. Housing (Community Development/Planning Department/Consultant) • Add all new required Met Council Plan Elements. • Add text/explaination and a map of the City Council approved neighborhoods. • Summarize/include the Policy on Affordable Housing adopted by the City Council in 2015 as a response to housing demand and opportunities, stemming from a desire to foster diversity. • Include a discussion of schools and the Districts and their importance to the community and its future. Heritage Preservation (Heritage Preservation Board/Planning Department) • Update Current Conditions/Historic Context and Inventory. • Identify any new trends and challenges. • Review and update Goals and Policies. Transportation (Engineering/Transportation Commission/Consultant) • Add new required Met Council Plan Elements. • Transportation Commission findings need to be updated in the Plan. • Traffic safety changes need to be updated in the plan. • Include the 2015 Living Streets Plan in the Comp Plan Update. • Traffic changes and congested areas need to be identified. d__________ -- ___ .... City of Edina• 4801 W.506h St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO r."---.4:1•3A, 1 w9�1 j 4. e s' .4',;" ci \../•1 Water Resource Management(Engineering Department/Consultant) 'l • Add all new required Met Council Plan Elements. • Storm sewer, sanitary sewer and other utilities need to be addressed given land use changes and forecasts. Review and address wastewater capacity in the Southdale area. • Flood Plain maps and areas of concern need to be updated and addressed. • Water and wellhead protection should be updated in the Plan. Parks and Recreation (Parks and Recreation Department) • Update current conditions including the conversion of the Fred Richards golf course, updates to Breamar golf course and the 9-Mile Creek/3 Rivers corridor among others. • Identify trends and challenges going forward. • Review and revise goals and polices as needed. Energy and Environment(Energy and Environment Commission) • Review and revise/update all sub-sections of the chapter including: Climate change and globa warming, energy, solar protection, residential/commercial/industrial/city energy consumption, waste and air. • Add all new required Met Council Plan Elements including "Resilience" requirements. Community Services (Police and Fire, IT, Communications, Engineering and Community Development/ Planning Departments) • Police and Fire departments will be asked to determine what they feel their needs might be in the next ten years. Much will depend on what is foreseen in the changes in demographics over the last ten years, and the demographic projections, including changes in the workforce population. The following are two new Plan Elements required by the Met Council for 2018 Comp Plan Updates. There are 8 required Plan Elements; however, 6 have already been part of the current Comprehensive Plan. The Comp Plan Update will address all 8 Elements as required by the Met Council. *Resilience (Energy and Environment Commission, Health, Community Development/Planning/Consultant) • This is a new Plan Element required by the Met Council that is meant to integrate strategies into the Update for communities to be more resilient in the face of changing climate. This will more than likely be/has been integrated into the Climate Change and Global Warming sub-chapter o{ the Energy and Environment portion of the Comp Plan Update. City of Edina• 4801 W.506 St. ° Edina, MN 55424 1 CITY OF EDINA MEMO r------,-s:14 ��4 64(12. t vfEJ,74,,,s,,.-,0 • Add a "Healthy Communities" or public health and wellness section to the Comp Plan Update. This will tie- in with other sections of the Plan including Park and Recreation, Transportation, etc. *Competitiveness (Economic Development, Community Development/Planning Departments, Consultant) • Create a new chapter that satisfies the Met Council's Plan Element. • Identify activities that directly aim to retain, attract and grow businesses that bring wealth and prosperity to Edina. Concluding Comments This is a general over-view of the required elements, areas of responsibility and tools available that are associated with Edina's 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. Attached is a general draft timeline schedule of tasks and target dates associated with the final submission to the Metropolitan Council and City Council approval and adoption. Moving forward, the Planning Commission is asked to review the current Comprehensive Plan to affirm areas of the plan that endure and continue to guide a successful community and identify those areas of the Plan that are outdated or need change and attention given the last 10 years. What works in our current plan and what needs to be revised, changed, or addressed? The Planning Commission is asked to think about the Task Force (The Planning Commission); individual responsibilities to the City's other Boards and Commissions; and the make up of work groups (anticipated to be made up of residents) for the individual "small areas" of planning focus. (Cahill, Grandview, Southdale, 44th and 50th & France, Valley View/Wooddale.) We will continue discussion on the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update as a reoccurring agenda item on all upcoming Planning Commission Meetings. City of Edina• 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO ow e � gm O • ���i,ee Kwo. Date: August 24, 2016 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Densities allowed within the current Comprehensive Plan The following is intended to provide an overview of the current land use/density in the current Edina Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plan Update (Background — Development Density) A Comprehensive Plan is a broad statement of community goals and policies that direct the orderly and coordinated physical development of a city into the future. It provides the framework for shaping future growth and change, for protecting what a community values, for enhancing what the community wants to improve, and for creating what the community feels is lacking. The Planning Commission uses the Comprehensive Plan, mainly the Land Use Chapter, as the basis for its deliberations and decisions regarding review of development applications, and for its recommendations to the City Council. Minnesota State law requires that comprehensive plans be reviewed and updated at least once every I0 years. The current Edina Comprehensive Plan was adopted September 9th, 2009. The Met Council must approve the City's Comprehensive Plan, as the overseer of all Comprehensive Plans in the metro area. As required by the Metropolitan Council, residential density must be planned for within every city. The following pages from the Land Use Chapter, shows the current Comprehensive Guide Plan designations and the maximum densities allowed in Edina. Please note that Edina's Comprehensive Plan suggests maximum height requirements, however, height is not a requirement of the Metropolitan Council. One of the key items of consideration for the upcoming Comprehensive Plan update will be consideration of density allowed in our commercial/mixed use areas. The Planning Commission is asked to start thinking about these areas and the density/height that might be best suited for these areas. This document may be used as a quick reference for allowed density and height as we consider the update over the next couple years. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO ,,,,..,..,,,_,A,,,,,,,. X •lNCY,APOt---° Edina Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use Plan & Height Xnn Legend W 39th St I I,�R. Dars„Rm'"”' I I: ::: I EEE: .�P, .eh. ....a, ,�; CITY OF EDINA MEMO w.4•691�A ��� d cn yo Legend LDR-Low Density Residential OR-Once Residential -RM-Regional Medical WAR-Low Density Atlached Residential=0-Office -OSP-Open Space and Parks MDR-MCOiumDensity Residential -MXC-Stied Use Center PSP-Public/Semi-Public _ I-CR-High Density Residential =CAC-CommcntyAetNity Center` I LAH-UreitedAccess I-igturay -NC•Neighborhood Commercial -I-Mdustrial ''ii a lj 2 3-5 II YJ 64th 54 HDR s L 4 t S'`, \11.1%.4 . 2 _ OR CAC ..al 4 W6ftth St 2 ail IF W 70th S6 I. O L , aEjii ._ P ,( L,_.. , k d Height Limits 14 4 o 12 Illa 2 m 2 Stories:24 0 3 Stories:36' a 4 Stories:48' 4j N 5 Stories:96' 8 Stories:96' °* it...',",,.,,,--.. ' , ' AI 9 Stories:108' 10 Stories:120' e -4 ,_p 4 , HDR 37 4 mi — 12 Stories:144' — • B ' 2 Standard Height 9 t, "Podium Heightlititif 14 1\IDR a` _ r W 76th St 12 4 OR z i \ 2 9 2 ' �•\ ,,, W 77th St -` 6 -----OR- ----. it g .i .i00055t0 0r_ 12 v r F °Height may be increased to six stories&75 feet if OR co =? , podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. tune Land Use Plan with ^", BuildingHeights 41242 City of Edina Southeast Quadrant °•w,...,' 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figtae 4.6B Data Source:URS 0 0 0.5 hides City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO 1 w91�j� w oe � v3 �•E.y O • aeea Legend !DR-LoW Dense./Residenhal OR-Office Resideriel _RM-Regional Metal WAR-Low Densly Attached ResidentialEn 0-Once -OSP-Open Space and Packs i I g. MDR-Medium Density Resitlenaal -MXC-MMed Use Center POP-Pubic/Semi-Public a-'• ® -V -7— R-High Densly Residential CAC-Comm*Mtreiy Center f-_-]LAH-IirniedAccess Ed500ay wl9th fit -NC•Neighborhood Commercial I-Intlustrial .: • v.. ,, y�1.t 42n.St ri a _.� =.I in I rjiij � j 4/ P a r:t ; - <: q/7 ao \ © 01 N 174 NC .t ?� °0 J.y .1a m _, 20 a 2 co -let 0 i o P-;• /. -.i Neto S[ / N f __...IM,Ulh 9l et O E 1 NC p, ii Scuthvlcw La I . L I ' al WI r- al wsat J Batitnn Ave .i 2N ei I Height Limits ' o V 22 Stories:24iit 3 °° 3 Stories:36' "i • z 4 Stories:48' 6 Stories:72 c,,�_.... . ._. :. Y 4.4, Standard Height NC » o I' Podium Height 31 CC 1 \- HDR,, yreamst LM Future Land Use Plan with %iT "� City of Edina Building Heights ® Northeast Quadrant 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.6A Data Source:URS0 G 0.5 Mlles City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO �wl� /oma tat )IT.'il -,,,.,%% _1,C-,32 ,"Z) ,,.,,570 t%F1 vJ Legend • • LDR-Low Density Resitlentrel OR-OIFce Resitlene RrI-Regions Metlical LDAR-Low Densitp Attxhetl Residenigi O-CRce OSP•Open Space and Parks MDR-Medium Density Resitlengal MXC-Hued Us'e Center PSP-Pub4tlSeni-Public `' . HIDR-High Densely Restlerrtial CAC-Cxrrnn ninsxtivdy Center tAH-IimiletlAccess HghMay -....Bo e A -..- ;..-. _.. -NC-Neighborhootl Commertial -I-IneLstrlal _ - -- !a .*0 H:�'�` �� IDR �.• I 1160 VxilaS La ?, II WO e � 4 0 3�. ' ri pa -- -b6eh SI NC I 4="'' r¢ V 1 _.._ W 76th St cn M IDR •m .MDR O i.` a'aa.dtrs Bawe Nl-- _J 3 I 1RII?R i 1' 1 \IDR II E o Height Limits ., '-- -- i M 3 Stories:36' 1 I • 8 Stories:96' S,s• 213• 1 Standard Height ,. J I J ra. fH e Podium Height _•;_ U »/ 3a rn �1 Future Land Use Plan with SICity Building Heights of Edina Southwest Quadrant ,, 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.6C Data Source:URS 0 0 0s Miles City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. a Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO 91N •1j.�� e � •�V�bAtlJH^C6C• esa As demonstrated on the previous pages, there are a variety of Land Use designations, especially in the Greater Southdale Area, including CAC, Community Activity Center, MXC, Mixed Use, OR, Office Residential, RM Regional Medical and HDR, High Density Residential. The area is mixed use area allowing multiple uses on individual sites. The following language from the Comprehensive Plan provides a description of these areas. Densities are based on units per acre. Categories Description, Land Uses Development Guidelines Density Range HDR Existing "high-rise"and other Provide incentives for 12-30 units/acre Density for concentrated multi-family updating older multifamily senior housing may be High-Density residential, some of which may buildings. increased to over 30 units per Residential contain a mixed use component. acre,based on proximity to Work to create an attractive, hospitals,proximity to low May also include limited office, pedestrian-friendly street density uses,utilities capacity, service or institutional uses primarily edge and provide convenient level of transit service available,and impact on to serve residents' needs, parks and access to transit, schools, adjacent roads.Other desired open space parks, and other community items to allow greater density destinations. for senior housing would include:Below grade parking, provision of park or open space,affordable housing, sustainable design principles, and provision of public art. Floor to Area Ratio:per current Zoning Code OR Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing streetscape 12-30 residential dwelling thoroughfares or between higher- and building appearance, units/acre Office-Residential intensity districts and residential improve pedestrian and transit districts. Many existing highway- environment. Floor to Area Ratio-Per No current current Zoning Code: oriented commercial areas are examples in City. Encourage structured parkingmaximum of 0.5 to 1.0* anticipated to transition to this more g Potential examples and open ace linka es where mixed-use character. p p g include Pentagon feasible;emphasize the Park area and other Primary uses are offices,attached or enhancement of the pedestrian I-494 corridor multifamily housing. environment. locations Secondary uses:Limited retail and service uses(not including"big box" retail),limited industrial(fully enclosed),institutional uses,parks and open space.Vertical mixed use should be encouraged,and may be required on larger sites. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 CITY OF EDINA MEMO cn o e et Ay •�yco eao.Kw°• MXC Established or emerging mixed use Maintain existing,or create new, 12-30 residential dwelling districts serving areas larger than one pedestrian and streetscape units/acre Mixed-Use Center neighborhood(and beyond city amenities;encourage or require boundaries). structured parking.Buildings Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Current examples: "step down"in height from Zoning Code:maximum of 1.5 Primary uses: Retail,office,service, intersections. • 50th and France multifamily residential,institutional uses, • Grandview parks and open space. 4 stories at 50th&France;3-6 stories at Grandview Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. CAC The most intense district in terms of uses, Form-based design standards for 12-105 residential dwelling height and coverage. building placement,massing and units/acre Community Activity street-level treatment. Center Primary uses:Retail,office,lodging, Floor to Area Ratio-Per current entertainment and residential uses, Buildings should be placed in Zoning Code:maximum of 0.5 to Example: Greater combined or in separate buildings. appropriate proximity to streets to 1.0" Southdale area(not create pedestrian scale. Buildings including large multi- Secondary uses: Institutional,recreational "step down"at boundaries with Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 family residential uses. lower-density districts and upper on a case by case basis,subject to neighborhoods such stories"step back"from street. proximity to utilities capacity, as Centennial Lakes) Mixed use should be encouraged,and level of transit service available, may be required on larger sites. More stringent design standards and impact on adjacent roads. for buildings>5 stories. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the Emphasize pedestrian circulation; high end of the residential housing re-introduce finer-grained range above,would include: circulation patterns where feasible. Below grade parking,provision of park or open space,affordable housing,sustainable design principles,provision of public art, pedestrian circulation,and podium height. RM Hospitals,senior housing*,medical and Form-based design standards for 12-80 senior residential dwelling dental offices and clinics,and laboratories building placement,massing and units/acre Regional Medical for performing medical or dental research, street-level treatment. diagnostic testing,analytical or clinical Floor to Area Ratio-Per current work,having a direct relationship to the Pedestrian circulation and open Zoning Code:maximum of 1.0 providing of health services. General space amenities should be For medical office uses.Density office uses are permitted. provided for larger sites. for senior housing shall be based on proximity to hospitals, *Senior housing may include: proximity to low density uses, independent living,assisted living, utilities capacity,level of transit memory care,and skilled nursing. service available,and impact on adjacent roads.Other desired items to allow greater density would include:Below grade parking,provision of park or open space,affordable housing, sustainable design principles,and provision of public art. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 PLANNING COMMISSION J F M A M J J A S 0 N D Work Session Work Session #of Mtgs. Attendance% Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 NAME TERM >.;.;. ,:. (Enter Date) (Enter Date) Hobbs, Steve 3/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 87% Olsen,Jo Ann 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 100% Lee, Susan 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 93% Platteter, Michael 2/1/2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 100% Bennett,Jimmy 2/1/2016 1 1 1 1 4 93% Hamilton,John 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 100% _Thorsen,Todd 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 100% Strauss,Gerard 3/1/2018 1 1 1,1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14 93% Nemerov, Ian 3/1/2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 100% Ma,Amy 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 13 87% Kivimaki, Peter 9/1/2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15 100% Liaisons: Do not enter numbers into the last two columns. Meeting numbers&attendance percentages will calculate automatically. INSTRUCTIONS: Counted as Meeting Held(ON MEETINGS' LINE) Attendance Recorded(ON MEMBER'S LINE) Regular Meeting w/Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1" under the month for each attending member. Regular Meeting w/o Quorum Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Joint Work Session Type"1"under"Work Session"on the meetings'line. Type"1"under"Work Session"for each attending member. Rescheduled Meeting* Type"1"under the month on the meetings'line. Type"1"under the month for each attending member. Cancelled Meeting Type"1"under the month on the meetings' line. Type"1"under the month for ALL members. Special Meeting There is no number typed on the meetings' line. There is no number typed on the members'lines. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given,the previously-scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with a special meeting.