Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-04-19 Meeting PacketEngineering Department • Phone 952-826-0371 Fax 952-826-0392 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: April 12, 2012 To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne Houle Re: Reminder City Council Workshop with Edina Transportation Commission 5:00 PM April 17, 2012 City Hall - Community Room Engineering Department • 7450 Metro Blvd • Edina, MN 55439 MEMO AGENDA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS April 19, 2012 6:00 P.M. I. /CALL TO ORDER A. Election of Chair and Vice Chair II. /OLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. /APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Regular Meeting of February 16, 2012 B. Regular Meeting of March 15, 2012 ✓V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the Transportation Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of . speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS (� TLC Bike Boulevard Project Presentation Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements Presentation Transportation Options Working Group — Election of Co-chair D. Updates i. ✓Student Member ii. ,,tike Edina Task Force -March 8, 2012 Minutes iii. /Grandview Small Area Study France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements Update Living Streets Working Group Update VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Agenda / Edina Transportation Commission April 19, 2012 Page 2 A. Member Roster (Will be available at the meeting) VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 1X. ' STAFF COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. if you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Thursday April 12 TLC Bike Boulevard Information Meeting 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC WORKS Tuesday April 17 City Council Workshop with ETC 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tuesday April 17 Grandview Area Plan to City Council 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday April 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Monday Apr 23 Annual Volunteer Reception 5:00 P.M. BRAMAR RM WARREN HYDE CLUB HS Tuesday May 15 TLC Bike Boulevard Public Hearing—City Council 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tuesday May 15 Gallagher Drive & Nine Mile Creek Trail Public Hearing 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thursday May 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday June 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM • G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012Agendas\20120419 Agenda.docx MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA • TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM February 16, 2012 6:00 P.M. New members, Courtney Whited, Tom LaForce and Surya Iyer were welcomed to the Commission. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Braden, Franzen, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Thompson approving the meeting agenda. All voted ave. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 2012 Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member Nelson to approve the minutes. All voted ave. Motion carried. APRPOVAL OF TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF FEBRUARY 1, 2012 Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Nelson accepting the February 1, 2012 Traffic Safety Report. All voted ave. Motion carried. *,OMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Feasibility Study City engineer Houle said the feasibility report completed by Mr. Andy Plowman of WSB & Associates, was handed out recently. He said Mr. Plowman was in attendance to answer questions. Mr. Houle said all of Tracy Avenue was in the Capital Improvement Plan for concrete replacement but upon closer scrutiny it was determined that more work was needed and therefore, the roadway was broken into two phases from Vernon Avenue to Benton Avenue, and Benton Avenue to the crosstown. Additionally, staff is working on a grant for up to $500,000 through MnDOT for the crosstown interchange at Tracy Avenue. Some of the issues are concrete replacement and an offset intersection at Benton and, Mr. Houle said now is time to evaluate making changes. He said Council also asked that they consider a sidewalk on the west side. He said discussions included leaving the intersection as is or realign with a roundabout. He said staff's recommendation is to realign the intersection with a roundabout which fits well with bus turning movements and does not slow fire trucks response time. He said the roundabout is safer because crossing distance for pedestrians are decreased and when in the roundabout drivers are only looking to the left instead of looking 4 ways like a 4 -way intersection, and it also serves as a traffic calming measure. Additional recommended features include bike lanes to comply with the City of Edina's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan; instead of sidewalk on the west side which would require 9 ft. of right-of-way, they are instead going to improve crossings; 28 parking spaces; and bump -out intersections. Di -ruction 6r. Plowman handed out a revised survey tabulation. Chair Janovy asked if any of the response majorities had changed nd Mr. Plowman said that regarding the roundabout, it is now closer to 50/50. In reference to the feasibility report stating support from the Countryside's Site Council, chair Janovy said she has received information from the school district outlining the procedures to follow for their support and while the Site Council's opinion is important, she said ,they do not speak for the superintendent and the school board. Everyone agreed that the roadway needs to be reconstructed and to keep existing sidewalk. Members' feedback is as follow: Member Thompson said the bike lanes are critical to be consistent with Comp Plan. He said also to maximize parking on the eastside and that bump -outs would help to slow traffic. Member Bass agreed with the bike lanes because it is a school and riding could help to relieve congestion around arrival/dismissal time. She also said research shows that bike lanes makes road safer. She said it does not appear that people are committed to parking and suggested eliminating parking so prevent widened of the roadway. Mr. Houle clarified that widening of the roadway is due to both parking and the bike lanes. He said widening on the west by 4 ft. is necessary because of a storm sewer pipe on the east that would need to be moved and would increase cost because of watershed rules. Chair Janovy confirmed that per state law, bikers are allowed on the roadway. Members Janovy, Schweiger, Braden, Iyer, LaForce, and Nelson agreed with the bike lanes. Member Iyer also agreed with maximizing parking. Member LaForce asked if Vernon to the north was also striped with bike lanes. Mr. Houle said no; he said this is the starting point and it gives them something to build on. Member Franzen said the ETC should focus on Comp Plan related issues and not on parking. Member Whited said according to residents no one is biking now. She suggested doing before/after counts to show residents usage. She said she has seen an increase in biking on W. 58`h since the new striping. Mr. Houle was asked bout the bike lane on Interlachen Blvd. He said ridership have increased on Interlachen Blvd which is striped with a 3-4 ft. lane on certain segment and share the road on other segment. He said most homes do not front Interlachen Blvd and therefore parking was not an issue and the speed limit was and still is 30 mph. He said minor modifications were done to a property near Bywood West to accommodate the bike lane. Chair Janovy said there is a cost associated with parking and that TLC has an article about the myth of free parking. She said based on 54 parking spaces, she calculated that the cost would be $1800/space and residents would be assessed 20% of this cost. If spaces are reduced to 28, she said the cost goes up to $3500/space. She said she has only seen one car parked there. Member Iyer concurred that he too has not seen too many cars parked there and that most times parking are only needed for lots of guests. He said the cost of parking though is relative. Member Bass said parking does spike but there is not an overwhelming demand and it is used infrequently. Chair Janovy was asked if residents would be assessed less if parking was eliminated and she said yes, approximately $250. Member Nelson noted that parking did not appear important but the 2"d survey shows that residents are split 50/50. Member Franzen said they should be strategic about parking and balance it with bump -outs. Mr. Houle said this would give visual cue to slow down vs. having a wide open roadway and it was noted that last speed taken was at 36.7 meaning 85% of drivers were driving this speed or lower. Regarding the offset intersection, Member LaForce said leaving it 'as is' is not an option. It was noted that one survey showed 65% favorable toward roundabout or realignment and another one showed 77% favorability. Mr. Houle said roundabouts work great because studies show reduction of accidents; pedestrian safety is maximized; and they simplify/reduces risk for drivers/pedestrians. Chair Janovy the intersection does not have a history of crashes so therefore, nothing to reduce. She said there are 10 years of safety data. Member Thompson said it is being added as a Kmponent to slow traffic and aid with flow during peak hours. Member Bass said the feel at the intersection is nfusing and this is how drivers should feel so that they'll slow down. Member Nelson said he is a proponent of roundabouts but leave as is because there are not too many problems. He said the intersection is odd but it works well. 2 Member Franzen said it is functioning; however, the roundabout is safer and a better long term solution. In terms of size, Mr. Houle said it would be comparable to the ones on W. 70th, although traffic volume is lower. •Mr. Plowman cited Mendota Heights with similar lower traffic volume, same issue and skepticism. He said the roundabout was built and now everyone likes it. In addition to other features already noted, Mr. Plowman said studies show that air quality also improves due to less stopping. Mr. Houle was asked if the City has a policy for roundabouts and he said no because they are so new. He said Living Streets may address roundabouts. Member Iyer asked about the cost vs. benefit. Mr. Houle said the volume is lower but the roundabout would help with traffic flow. Member Iyer said there is an advantage to keep flow going but the cost is too high. Mr. Plowman said the realignment is more expensive at $240,000 while the roundabout would be $165,000. Member Thompson said there is a place on Benton where parents make U-turn to pick up students. Mr. Plowman said he has observed this and the roundabout would eliminate the U-turns. Chair Janovy said this is an opportunity for education and enforcement at the site. She said from the first survey, 23% said they were fine with the intersection; 58% said it was a problem; and 19% were cautious. In the second survey 60% said to leave as is; and 40% said realign. She said she likes roundabouts but not at this location. She said this one should have off ramps for bikers and it should be designed for all ages. Mr. Plowman said off -ramps are only needed on dual lane roundabouts. Members Iyer and Bass concurred with Chair Janovy. Residents Comments Sue Nelson, 5701 Hawkes Ter — Ms. Nelson said she has been resident for 20+ years and a pass educator at Countryside. She said realignment is a better option. She said she loves roundabouts but not in favor of one at this location because it will not help. Susan Clark, 5812 W. 61St — Ms. Clark said high school students drives Benton to Tracy to get to the high school and she wondered if they will go all the way around the roundabout. She said it is good to consider the Countryside students. She said the school has said they would need additional crossing guards. She said one problem is solved and another Oreated. Judith Rogers, corner of Arbor Lane and Tracy — Ms. Rogers said drivers traveling south on Tracy from Vernon may not see children in the roundabout. She said if obstructions are not placed in the roundabout drivers may drive over it and if obstructions are placed, it may prevent drivers from seeing pedestrians. Steve Enck, 5700 Benton — Mr. Enck said he is against the roundabout. He said he will not have safe access to his driveway; every road is up hill; has hindrance; stop signs are working; pedestrian lane for children are bigger; might improve flow of cars but not pedestrians; easier for crossing guards as is. And, speaking on behalf of his neighbor who is confined to a wheelchair, he said neither of them has seen any accidents in their time as residents. He said only two ideas were presented and suggested having three or four options including his suggestion to remove parking on Benton from Tracy to the school's driveway; widen Benton to the intersection, keeping the stop signs and allowing for better turn movement for the buses. Chair Janovy asked if other options were considered including widen of the west leg of Benton, near the intersection. Mr. Plowman said widen would help the buses at the intersection but the idea was to create a design for the entire operation of the corridor including speeding which is a problem for the residents. He said roundabouts are safer for pedestrians because they are crossing 16 ft. of traffic at a time instead of 36 ft., plus four potential conflicts with the offset intersection. Member Franzen said Mr. Enck's driveway does seem to be a problem with the roundabout. Mr. Houle said he would work with him to realign and landscape. Bill Rogers, 6100 Arbor Lane — Mr. Rogers said he submitted written comments. He said 71% of residents on his survey 4 aid the roundabout is not appropriate and neither is a standard cross intersection because it would cause T-bone ccidents. He said east on Benton there is a pond like a roundabout and a fatality that happened there could happen at the roundabout and there have not been accidents to date. He said it is not broken, they do not want traffic to flow and 3 if traffic backs up, so what? He said there is new specifications in the works for visual impair pedestrians which this roundabout will not have. He said he liked Mr. Enck's idea. •Ken Kjelland, 5600 Tracy — Mr. Kjelland said he has been a resident since 1982. He said he attended two meetings, completed two surveys and report is still being submitted as is and not reflecting residents' input. He said he has concluded that residents do not have input. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Bass for chair Janovv to write the recommendation for submittal to the Council with assistance from members Nelson Franzen and Bass. All voted ave. Motion carried. Members were polled regarding the following (polling included student member Schweiger): Bike Lanes: all said yes (10). Parking: Staff said their recommendation is based on residents' needs and to accommodate delivery vehicles which tend to block traffic. Chair Janovy said deliveries were not a reason to retain parking. Member Bass said to reduce the travel lanes down from 11 ft. to 10 ft. and not widen the road. She was informed that a variance would be required. 7 of 10 said yes to parking as proposed. Reducing the speed limit to 25 mph because of the bike lanes: 2 of 10 said yes. Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member LaForce to recommend the proposed design as is north of Benton. 7 ayes, 2 nays. Motion carried. Roundabout: WElotion was made by member Nelson and seconded by member Iver to leave intersection as is. 8 ayes,1 nay. Motion carried. Member Thompson said most residents were in favor of the roundabout. A suggestion was made to consider pedestrian enhancements to improve crossing even though not recommending roundabouts, e.g. dynamic speed monitor, crosswalks, enforcements, etc. Motion was made by member Iver and seconded by member Bass to modify previous motion to say leave intersection as is and consider pedestrian enhancements to improve crossing. Motion was made by member Iver and seconded by member Bass to have limited parking, bike lanes, and no change to the intersection. Discussion ensued regarding a motion made earlier by member Thompson and this motion which are in conflict. Member Iyer withdrew his motion. TLC Bike Boulevard Update Mr. Houle said Katie Bruwelheide, traffic engineer with Alliant Engineering would give an update on the TLC Bike Boulevard. He asked that the ETC provide feedback before an informational meeting is scheduled with residents. He said the plan will be to come back to the ETC after the informational meeting with residents and then on to the Council for a public hearing. �is. Bruwelheide said the route starts at 54th & Zenith west on 54th to Wooddale Avenue, south of Wooddale to Valley ew Road, under TH-62 and down to 70th into an existing bike path. She said construction is tentatively scheduled to begin August with completion by fall. She said they are requesting design exceptions on a couple segments. She said the project has eight segments that are divided into two phases with phase two being the most difficult. Phase I is 54th to north of TH-62 and Phase II from north of TH-62 to W. 70th. Funding is not yet available for Phase II. The eight segments leare: Phase I 1. 54th Ave — Xerxes to France Avenue Option: Bike Boulevard (A) 54th — France to Minnehaha Creek Option 1: Shared Lanes Option 2: Advisory Lanes Option 3: Shared Lane and Bike Lane (B) 54th — Brookview Ave to Wooddale Avenue Option 1: Shared Lanes Option 2: Bike Lanes 3. Wooddale Ave — 54th to Valley View Road Option 1: Bike Lanes Option 2: Advisory Lanes 4. Valley View Road — Woodddale to Brookview Avenue Option: Colored Shared Lanes hase II 5. Valley View Road — Brookview Ave to 64th Street Option: Bike Lanes Valley View Road — 64th to 65th Street Option: Colored Shared Lanes Valley View Road — 65th to 66th Street Option: Dedicated Bike Lanes 8. Valley View Road — 66th to 69th Street Option: Dedicated Bike Lanes Discussion This route, the first phase of the Comprehensive Bike Plan, was chosen and narrowed down from an original route and it aligns with Minneapolis' bike lanes. Motion was made by member Thompson and seconded by member Nelson for the consultant to present options to the public that is most likely to be approved by State Aid. All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets Workshop Recap Motion was made by member Franzen and seconded by member Nelson to table Living Streets Workshop Recap until ext meeting. All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets Consultant Selection •After brief discussion, the consensus was to go with BARR Engineering, the only firm that submitted a proposal. Edina Transportation Commission Bylaws Chair Janovy said the bylaws should be adopted as written; however, she received permission to change the quorum from 5 to a simple majority of seated voting members, and also a section that seemed confusing was "If a quorum is not achieved within 15 minutes...." She said if they agree they can vote to make these changes at the next meeting. Updates Student Member - No updates. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of January 12, 2012 - No updates. Grandview Small Area Study Member Nelson said the public comment period is still going on and the framework is online at www.edinacitizenengagement.org. He said two public meetings were held and approximately 25-30 people attended. Council will receive the recommendation on April 17. Living Streets Working Group Member Thompson said they need discuss how to move forward. Chair Janovy said they could consider creating a committee of the whole. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS OM ember Nelson said France Avenue was recently restriped to single lane and he has seen cars using the shoulder as a driving lane. His suggestion of marking the shoulder to show that it is not a driving lane will be forwarded to Hennepin County by Mr. Houle. Member Bass talked briefly about a campaign that the City of Rochester (See Safe Smart) is doing and a possible funding opportunity through the Met Council for France Avenue. She will talk more these at the next meeting. She also asked about Engineering Department staffing which Mr. Houle addressed below. STAFF COMMENTS Update on France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Re -scoping Mr. Houle said City Manager Neal and WSB & Associates consultant Chuck Rickart made the presentation to the Funding and Programming Committee of the TAC, which is advisory to the Met Council's Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). He said some of the TAC's concerns were not addressing bike facility and at crossing video detection. He said some on the the committee felt the bridge was safer than grade separation. He said the vote was 8 ayes and 10 nays. He said they will be appealing to the TAB and Mr. Rickart to checking to see they can appeal to the TAC. Mr. Houle said it is promising because the TAB recently overturned a sunset date for another project. Staffing in the Engineering Department— Mr. Houle said the entire City has gone through reorganization. He said he was the public works director/city engineer and as of recent he is no longer the public works director. He said they are currently advertising to fill the assistant city engineer position but this person will not be the liaison to the ETC. Mr. Houle will continue as the liaison until a transportation engineer is hired. Additionally, the utility engineer position will be vacant soon and this position will be changed to an environmental engineer (if approved by Council) and serve as the aison to the EEC. Mr. Houle asked the commission if they would be interested in -an orientation on functionality of the City. He said city manager Kurt has put together a PowerPoint presentation that they might find useful. They all agreed that ,assistant this would be helpful. It will be scheduled one hour before the next scheduled meeting in March. Regarding the agenda, Mr. Houle said it is set up similar to the Council agenda showing upcoming meeting dates and events. He said members can add meeting dates also. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 10:10 p.m. ATTACHMENT Attendance Spreadsheet 0 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM March 15, 2012 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering roll call was Members Bass, Franzen, Iyer, Janovy, LaForce, Nelson, Schweiger, Thompson, and Whited. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA The meeting agenda was changed as follows: Item A, 'State Complete Streets meeting update' was deleted, and item G, '1494 Auxiliary Lane Municipal Consent' took its place. Motion was made by member LaForce and seconded by member Thompson approving the revised meeting agenda. All voted ave. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 16.2012 Approval was carried over until the next meeting. COMMUNITY COMMENT — None. REPORT/RECOMMENDATIONS 1494 Auxiliary Lane Municipal Consent r. Scott Pedersen from MnDOT, gave the same presentation that was presented previously to the ETC at the January 19, 2012 meeting, plus some new information that are in italics. Mr. Pedersen said MnDOT is doing three different projects over three phases and they are: 1-494 from TH-100 to 24th Avenue; construct auxiliary lanes on westbound 1-494; and reconstruction of the Xerxes Avenue Bridge. The project letting will be June 8, 2012, and construction will begin August, 2012, and end Fall, 2013. The three phases are: Phase I (Bid Letting June 8, 2012, Construction Start Date August 12 to late Fall, 2012;) Construct auxiliary lanes on westbound 1-494 between Portland Avenue and Nicollet Avenue; and 1-35 and TH-100. Reconstruct the outside shoulders on both eastbound and westbound of 1-494. Reconstruct the inside shoulders from 24th Avenue to TH-77, and resurface 1-494 from 24th Avenue to TH-77. Traffic controls will include maintaining 3 drive lanes in daytime peak hours and closing the following ramps: Nicollet, Portland, 12`x' and probably France. Traffic will be pushed to the inside while they work on the outside shoulders. Phase II (Spring to Summer, 2013) Reconstruction of the inside shoulders of 1-494 from TH-77 to TH-100. Remove guardrail and curb and gutter and replace with concrete barrier. Reconstruct drainage system in median to facilitate modification to the median. Traffic controls will include pushing traffic to the outside lanes while they work in the middle and it is not known at this time if ramp closures will be necessary. Phase III (Summer to Fall, 2013) Resurface 1-494 between TH-100 and TH-77. This work will be done in sections over four weekends with complete closure each section and detouring of traffic. Xerxes Avenue Bridge construction will be Fall, 2012, to late Spring, 2013. The bridge will be closed and taken out this August and reopen Spring, 2013 (it is Leing raised for more vertical clearance On the corridor). The following intersections will remain open for as long as it is feasible: Edinborough Way, 78th Street, and Southtown Blvd. Mr. Pedersen said issues identified during the City of Edina's open house were proposed typical section under the Xerxes Avenue Bridge; 1-494 as a managed facility; and access to Xerxes Avenue from 1-494. Mr. Pedersen said they are usually asked why there is so much space under the Penn and Nicollet Bridges and he said it is 26 ft. that is reserved for future expansion of 1-494 for six lanes in each direction. He said Xerxes will not have 26 ft. reserved and it is a risk that MnDOT is willing to accept because the current 20 year plan does not include expansion. MnDOT's 20 year plan and the Met Council's Transportation Policy Plan show 1-494 as a Tier 11 Managed Corridor similar to 1-35W. He said discussion has included the auxiliary lane being a toll lane that would be open in peak hours but in the meantime they would like to add it as a general purpose lane and change to toll in in the future. And this is what MnDOT is hoping cities will agree to in a resolution. After discussion, he said the lane under Xerxes does not fit the true definition of an auxiliary lane and probably should not be called an auxiliary lane. ADA provisions for Xerxes Avenue & Edinborough Way was redesigned based on feedback from the City using a single axle truck as the design vehicle. This resulted in extension of the island as a refuge, narrower road and shorter pedestrian crossing. City engineer Houle said the public hearing is scheduled for April 3 and that Mr. Pederson will be giving the same presentation to the Council. Mr. Houle said he is looking for a recommendation from the ETC to Council. �otion was made by member Nelson to accept the recommendation as written and forward to Council and the low motion was seconded by member LaForce. All voted ave. Motion carried. Chair Janovy said she is not comfortable using the word "believes" in the resolution. After discussion the word "believes" was changed to "acknowledge." Member Nelson accepted the amendment to his motion to include deleting "believes" that appears twice in the resolution and replacing them with "acknowledge." Motion was made by member Franzen to approve the amended motion and it was seconded by member Iver. All voted ave. Motion carried. Grandview Small Area Study — Kevin Staunton Mr. Staunton said he is the vice -chair of the Planning Commission and chair of the Steering Committee for the Grandview Small Area Planning Process. He thanked member Nelson and past member Bonneville for their support on the Steering Committee. He said they started the 2nd phase in April 2010 and had three community workshops in fall; worked with a consulting team; and the steering committee approved the development framework in January. He said they are in the public comment period and is hoping to incorporate suggestions from the public at their March 29 meeting, before going to Planning Commission on April 11, and City Council April 17 for support. He said they are calling the plan a "Development Framework" to communicate the notion that it is a vision for implementation over the next 20 years but realistically, as it unfolds, some things may not be done as it is currently shown in the framework. He said while they did work with Jack Broz, a traffic consultant with HR Green, they have not done any traffic studies. He said this is where the ETC would get involved. The plan is on the City's website as well as at dinacitizenengagement.org. � Mr. Staunton said they developed seven Guiding Principles and the areas that relates to transportation are: A "connected" district; regional connections; more walkable; community and convenience parking; improve movement 0,ithin and access to the district; facilitate multiple modes of transportation; and preserve future transit opportunities. Mr. Staunton gave an overview of the framework as follows: Vernon Avenue He said discussion included 'right sizing' Vernon (which is old Hwy 169 and still acts this way today). Currently, the speed goes from 40 mph to 30 mph and it turns into a 4 -lane road. He said this is opposite of how it should function. He said they've discussed staying within the same right-of-way and redesigning the road to 2 lanes, with a turn lane, median, sidewalk and bike lanes. He said this is on a phasing schedule of 5-10 years because it is a County road and they've also discussed the option of the County turning it back to the City. Library Area Opening 53rd, 52"d, and 51St Streets to Vernon to facilitate crossings from Bedford/Oxford/Hankerson and designing in such a way so that drivers will know to slow down. He said there is a lot of cut thru traffic from Gleason to Hwy. 100 and this could probably discourage the cut thru. He said the only push back was from residents in the Richmond Hills neighborhood because Sherwood is their only access and they've talked about an alternative design with 53rd as a new connection to Sherwood. This area would also have a pedestrian path from Grandview Square to Jerry's. Intersection controls are still to be determined. This area would be done in the 2nd phase. Vernon, Interlachen Blvd, Gus Young Lane This area could have two pedestrian bridges - one over the railroad tracks called Grandview Crossings and another over TH100 to City Hall. The recommendation is to build a community center at the old public works site with structured parking with accommodation for future transit. H100 TH100 is currently a split diamond built to accommodate traffic from old Hwy. 169 and the plan is to eliminate the dangerous design on the west side by redesigning a frontage road with an intersection, and an intersection also on the east side, by Tupa Park. This would remove all aspects of old Hwy 169. He said the idea is to create a design that would separate drivers going to and from TH100, from drivers whose destination is within the district and this might mean turning some streets such as Gus Young Lane into a one-way street. Grandview Square to Jerry's and school bus garage site The school district would like to move the bus garage but it has not been cost effective. This area could potentially be privately developed and go from no taxes to a tax based mixed used development. Park and Ride The framework shows Metro Transit's 587 express route and stops and also identifies three options for park and ride. There is a need for park and ride and the Met Council is eager to find a space in the area for 200 or less cars. Bicycle Plan Mr. Staunton thought a cool idea would be to have a bike path next to the railroad so that you go under Vernon to Brookview and to the Greenway. He showed an aerial map from 1953 and their 2023 dream design and how different it could be. He said he is unclear what the process will be after April 17 when the Council is scheduled to publicly review the framework. 6 hair Janovy commented on the inclusion of Complete Streets and Living Streets into the framework design and the cus on biking, walking and transit. She asked if there was something specific that the Council wanted them to review. Mr. Staunton said on February 28, they met in a work session with the Council and the Council asked if the ETC had seen 3 �J the transportation plan. He said they were reminded that ETC members Nelson and Bonneville were part of the steering committee but they are getting to the point where they will have to figure out how to navigate and identify who will be doing what. He said there is probably nothing for the ETC to do at this time. Regarding the implementation steering committee, he said he is not sure how the Council is going to handle this. He said it is possible that they may give transportation to the ETC, landuse to the Planning Commission, etc. He said the Council has asked for a recommendation for height and density of proposed buildings which is something the steering committee has not been able to agree on. Safe Routes to School Resolution — Katherine Bass Member Bass said there is proposed legislation in the 2012 bonding bill for $3M for Safe Routes to School projects to be administered through MnDOT. She said a coalition, led by the American Heart Association, is looking for cities and organizations to support a resolution for approval of the funds. She said there is a demand for infrastructure to allow more students to walk to school but there isn't enough funding. She asked if it is something that they should recommend to the Council for support. She said there is a report that shows that communities that have a plan in place are more successful in getting funding and chair Janovy said Bloomington Public Health has $30,000 set aside for Edina to develop a plan. Member Bass motioned to forward the resolution to the Council with a recommendation to pass resolution in support of inclusion of the funding in the bonding bill and the motion was seconded by member Whited. Chair Janovy said Safe Routes is one of top 3 priorities for the ETC for 2012. Thompson to review. All voted ave. Motion carried. Saeed Limit Policy Chair Janovy said the Council has reduced the speed limit on W. 58th and W. 70th and wants to do the same on Tracy. She said the current policy does not allow this and has put together information on speed limits and asked for feedback for a recommendation to Council to update the speed limit policy. Member Whited asked if there is any evidence that reducing the speed limit works because she is on a street where it has been reduced and there does not seem to be any difference. Chair Janovy said no, that additional reinforcements are needed, but Council still wants to do it. Member Franzen motioned that they recommend updating the speed limit Policy to the Council and the motion was seconded by member Bass. All voted ave. Motion carried. Member Janovy motioned to write the recommendation and member LaForce to review and the motion was seconded by member Thompson. All voted ave. Motion carried. Living Streets Workshop Recap Chair Janovy said there is a video of the workshop online. Member Bass said it was a great start to the conversation and that it was well represented by the school district, city, and various city commissioners. 46ity engineer Houle said BARR's lead person for the RFP has moved on and they do not have a replacement for him. He id HR Green has someone on staff and Mr. Houle recommended that they hire HR Green to work with BARR. Everyone agreed. 4 r r Edina Transportation Commission Bylaws hair Janovy said the bylaws were revised since last meeting. Member Iver motioned to approve the bylaws and the motion was seconded by member Franzen All voted ave Motion carried. For clarification, chair Janovy said for a cancelled meeting to count towards attendance, the meeting has to be cancelled ahead of time. She also said they can miss three meetings (provided 12 regular meetings have been scheduled); however, not in a row. Updates Student Member Member Schweiger said he liked the Grandview plan and that it will be easier for him to get there on his bike. Bike Edina Task Force — Minutes of February 9 2012 - No updates. Grandview Small Area Study Member Nelson said the public comment period is still open. TLC Bike Boulevard Update City engineer Houle said they are waiting for a response from MnDOT on the use of advisory lanes like City of Minneapolis has. The public meeting has not been scheduled yet. 0CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS STAFF COMMENTS Update on France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge Re -scopine City engineer Houle said the Funding and Programming Committee of the TAC did not approve their re -scoping plan and that they will be meeting with the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) on March 21. City Manager Neal will give the presentation. Gallagher Drive & Three Rivers Trail City engineer Houle said staff is working with Three Rivers District and SEH as the City's consultant, to put a trail on Gallagher Drive. He said the recommendation is to reduce the curb line, improve the intersection for at -grade crossing and add a trail on both sides of the road. The project limits is Parklawn to France. An informational meeting is scheduled for March 27, 5-6:30 p.m., at Centennial Lakes in the Hughes Pavilion. Tracy Avenue Roadway Reconstruction Project Update City engineer Houle said the plan was approved as recommended by the ETC. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 8:27p.m. ATTACHMENT 16tendance Spreadsheet • w 0 REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING 841 ICA REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: April 19, 2012 Subject: TLC Bike Boulevard Project Presentation Agenda Item No.: VI.A. ACTION: ® Recommendation/Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Recommendation/Motion: Recommend to the City Council to approve the proposed bike boulevard design. Info/Background: The City's consultant for this project, Mike Anderson of Alliant Engineering, Inc. will present the proposed bike boulevard project. Staff and consultant have received word from the Minnesota Department of Transportation — Municipal State Aid Division that we can utilize "advisory bike lanes" and "green bike lanes" on this project. Attached you will find an Open House Project Informational Sheet that was shared at the Informational Meeting on April 12; this sheet helps explain where these markings will be placed. The individual plan sheets as distributed at the February 16, 2012 Edina Transportation Meeting is being updated and will be available at the meeting. The City Council is setting a public hearing date of May 15 at their meeting on April 17. Attachments: Open House Project Information Sheet G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012 R&R\20120419\20120419 Item VI A TLC Bike Boulevard Project Presentation.docx .The project includes providing an on -street bicycle facilit that will connect Minneapolis and W 50' Street on the west and north termini, respectively to the existing W 70t Street bicycle lanes on the southern termini. • The bicycle facility will incorporate permanent pavement markings and/or roadway signing to designate the bike route. • The project will also include the construction of two (2) traffic circles. The traffic circles will be approximately 17-19 feet in diameter and located in the center of the 54th Street/Beard Avenue and 54th Street/Drew Avenue intersection. The existing intersection curb radii will not be impacted, altered or reconstructed with the traffic circles. • Bicycle detection will be added to the existing traffic signal system at the 54th Street/France Avenue intersection. The detection will include wireless technology and will require minor modifications to the existing traffic signal cabinet equipment. As designed, the project work will not change any roadway alignments, will not impact any existing curbs and will be completed entirely within existing curb face to curb face street width. The project will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 is anticipated to be completed by October 2012. The Phase 2 schedule is dependent project funds, which have yet to be identified. The project corridors are shown to the right. Seven exhibits are attached that illustrate the typical design for each roadway segment. � PHASE W PHASE II Existing Bike Route Future Mpls Bike Route 0 1 1S KI 10 19 3AV N3MOHO A ... a ativ � 0 � 0 � 0 k f co -a Cl) % � i k \ S c 2 LL 2 2 2 0 k k § � � / 41 � Ln . ( ` b � c � §S �}{ � k f co -a Cl) % � i k \ S c 2 LL 2 2 2 0 k k § � � / 41 � Ln . ( ` b � c � :.) LL Q | § O ( . , [ � u 4 k f co -a Cl) % � i k \ S c 2 LL 2 2 2 0 k k § � � / 41 � Ln � 0 I* W] go6, H I oil PEI \f 0 co 3AV 00011351 un i Mais JEW 3AV 31V000OM d is CL x uj 0 4-J cu cr oc m Co 0 wl > LL m < m NO cr 0 Ln 0 2 1 0 tiwm rQ . I m 0 rr '0 e—lk\�-- tA 0 n 0 0 o c0 O OC 2 is0 Ln 4) c (U ai m '0 0 0 0 m 0 rr '0 e—lk\�-- tA o e (n �y •fN�� roRePeae REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: April 19, 2012 Subject: Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements Presentation Agenda Item No.: VI.B. ACTION: ® Recommendation/Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information 10 Recommendation/Motion: Recommend to the City Council to approve the proposed Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements. n Info/Background: The City's consultant for this project, Toby Muse of SEH, Inc will present the proposed Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements. Attached you will find the Feasibility Study for this project. The City Council is setting a public hearing date of May 15 at their meeting on April 17. Attachments: • Feasibility Study for Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012 R&R\20120419\20120419 Item VI 8 Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements Presentation.docx _r t°&14XA::�� FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA -382 o( G ' ' ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Yr\ }y CITY OF EDINA v GALLAGHER DRIVE ROADWAY AND NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS April 12, 2012 LOCATION: Figure 1 below is a project location map of Gallagher Drive terminating at the France Avenue right-of-way (ROW) to the north and the Parklawn Avenue ROW to the south for a total distance of approximately 1,540 feet. 9 INITIATION & ISSUES: • E , Legend x �w I - _--- Proposed Trail Fy;... Project Area ILI 1' 4.MM♦ ft, ifrc Figure 1 — Project Location Map This project was initiated through a petition by the adjoining property owner and identified in the 2011-2015 Capital Improvement Plan as a 2011 project, but the project was not completed. As shown in the Exhibit 1 in the Appendix, this segment of Gallagher Drive is identified as a corridor for Three Rivers Park District's Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Staff has reached a preliminary agreement with Three Rivers Park District regarding reimbursement of design and construction costs associated with the Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 2 implementation of the regional trail. Development of a final regional trail agreement between the City and Three Rivers Park District is anticipated in July 2012. This project does not include regional trail crossings at France Avenue or Parklawn Avenue. Regional trail extensions at these locations will be addressed as separate projects in the future by Three Rivers Park District. Comprehensive Plan Figures 7.10 Sidewalk Facilities and 7.11 Bicycle Facilities in this study's Appendix are from the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update. Figure 7.10 identifies existing sidewalk along this segment of Gallagher Drive. Figure 7.11 identifies that this segment of Gallagher Drive is designated as a Primary Route for bicycle facilities from the 2007 Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This segment of Gallagher Drive is included in the City's Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway system. The street and public utilities were constructed in 1971. Street The existing street is surfaced with bituminous pavement. Patches, longitudinal cracking and transverse cracking are present throughout the street section as shown in Figures 2 and 3. Figure 2 - Looking north on Gallagher Drive from Parklawn Avenue 18 C Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 3 Figure 3 - Looking East on Gallagher Drive towards France Avenue The current street has with a width of 42 -feet that is flanked on both sides with concrete curb and gutter, 5 -foot sidewalks and no parking. An existing typical section is shown below in Figure 4. The pavement is generally in poor condition. R/W EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION R/W Figure 4 There are ten (10) commercial driveway entrances along the street. Metro Transit operates three (3) bus stops on the east/north side and two (2) bus stops on the west side of Gallagher Drive between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue as shown in Exhibit 2 in the Appendix. Currently, no designated pedestrian crossing locations exist. A majority of the horizontal and vertical geometry of this segment of Gallagher Drive meets minimum MSA requirements. However, the existing horizontal geometry includes a 180 -foot horizontal curve that does not meet the 300 -foot minimum MSA requirement for a designated 30 mile per hour roadway. As part of this study, 4 soil borings were taken in the project area. The borings indicate layers of predominantly sand fill overlying silty clayey fill below the street pavement. Black and brown silty and clayey sand fill was encountered in the boring nearest to France Avenue. Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 4 Storm Sewer • A high point is located approximately 350 -feet west of the France Avenue intersection. Storm water falling west and south of the highpoint sheet flows to the existing concrete curb and gutter and eventually to three (3) sets of existing catch basins on either side of Gallagher Drive; two (2) sets approximately 150 - feet north and one (1) set at the Parklawn Avenue intersection respectively. The driveway entrances consist of bituminous pavement and concrete valley gutters to allow for drainage across the entrance. Storm water falling east of the highpoint flows to existing storm sewer inlets in France Avenue. Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes Trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipe materials are ductile iron pipe and clay pipe respectively. The trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipes were constructed in 1971. Eight -inch (8") diameter trunk water main pipes serve the adjacent properties. The valves and hydrants connected to the trunk water main pipe are operable. According to Public Works records, no trunk water main breaks have occurred. Nine -inch (9") and twelve -inch (12") diameter trunk sanitary sewer pipes serve the adjacent properties. Based on the City's closed-circuit television inspections of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes, one minor crack was identified. No sags, offset joints or root intrusions were found to be present. e Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, telephone and cable television utilities all have infrastructure in the neighborhood. These utilities are buried underground both within and outside of Gallagher Drive's ROW. Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks No roadway lighting is present in the project area. 5 -foot sidewalks are located behind the existing curb and gutter sections along the entire length of this segment of Gallagher Drive. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project involves narrowing Gallagher Drive's width by moving the east and south curb lines to the west and north respectively in order to incorporate a boulevard and the multi -use regional trail. The remaining pavement that is not removed due to Gallagher Drive being narrowed will be milled off and overlayed with new pavement. Improvements to the existing storm sewer catch basins and pipe leads will be required. The project will protect all boulevard trees and landscape restoration will closely match existing in-place landscaping as much as possible. Street Gallagher Drive will be narrowed to create a 28 -foot street. In place of the removed pavement and curb and gutter, a 9 -foot boulevard including a shallow • swale and the 10 -foot regional trail will be incorporated. A typical section is shown in Figure 5. The existing curb and gutter and sidewalk on the west and north side of Gallagher Drive will remain in place. The project will shift the Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 5 • existing lane configurations and loop detectors of Gallagher Drive at the France Avenue intersection approximately 3' north in order to fit the regional trail within the existing ROW. R/W PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION R/W Figure 5 Due to the narrowing of Gallagher Drive, the existing bus stop on the east side near the horizontal curve will be moved approximately 150 -feet south in order to match the existing bus stop location on the west side and improve sight distance requirements near the horizontal curve. A designated pedestrian crossing will be incorporated approximately 100 -feet south of the existing bus stop located on the east side of Gallagher Drive near the horizontal curve. Pavement markings designating the crosswalk will be reflective white markings in a customized pattern that utilize thermoplastic treatments embedded in the bituminous surface. In May 2012, staff will request authorization from the Council to request a variance from MSA to maintain the existing 180 -foot horizontal curve configuration along Gallagher Drive. Constructing the horizontal curve to the 300 - foot MSA minimum standard would cause private property and building setback encroachments at 7333 Gallagher Drive A 2 -foot subcut backfilled with MnDOT Select Granular Borrow is recommended from the France Avenue intersection west approximately 500 -feet. The remaining bituminous street surface will be rehabilitated using a mill and overlay method thus retaining existing roadway cross slopes. Storm Sewer The project will shorten the existing storm sewer pipe leads along the east side of the roadway and install three (3) new open grate catch basin structures within the 9 -foot boulevard. The remaining pipe and existing catch basins will be removed. At intervals along the east curb line, curb cuts will be installed to allow storm water to flow into the proposed swale and either infiltrate or overland flow to the catch basins. Where a driveway or bus stop prevents the overland flow of water from reaching a catch basin, small diameter pipe will be installed underneath to continue to allow storm water conveyance. • Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes Trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipe reconstruction are not included in the proposed improvements. The project will require minor vertical height Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 6 adjustments to existing hydrants and/or gate valves located in the proposed • boulevard. Private Utilities No upgrades to the privately owned gas, electric, telephone and cable television utilities are proposed at the time of this study. Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks Roadway lighting is not included in the proposed improvements. Sidewalks will be removed on the east and south side and remain in place on the west and north side of Gallagher Drive as part of this project. The removed sidewalk will be supplemented by implementation of the multi -use regional trail. RIGHT-OF-WAY: Adequate right-of-way exists to implement this project. EASEMENTS: Easement acquisition is not anticipated to improve this project area. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $472,000 (2012 Dollars). The total estimated cost includes indirect costs for engineering and clerical and 6% for first year financing. The estimated total project cost is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of Total Estimated Project Cost ITEM ESTIMATED COST' CITY UTILITY FUNDS MSA THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT Regional Trail $120,000 Street Rehabilitation $284,000 Storm Sewer $6,000 $60,000 Water Main $2,000 Sub -total $6,000 $346,000 $120,000 Total $472,000 ' Costs are given in 2012 dollars Following completion of the project, Three Rivers Park District will reimburse the City for regional trail design and construction costs along Gallagher Drive. The remaining portion of the project will be funded through MSA and City utility funds. ASSESSMENTS: This project will be funded through Three Rivers Park District, MSA and City utility funds; therefore there is no special assessment is proposed for property owners. FEASIBILITY: City staff and its consulting engineer believe the improvements are necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering stand point. 0 r Feasibility Study Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvements April 12, 2012 Page 7 • PROJECT SCHEDULE: The estimated schedule shown in Table 2 is feasible from an Engineering standpoint. Table 2 Project Schedule Event Date Open House April 12, 2012 Edina Transportation Commission Meeting - Review April 19, 2012 Feasibility Study Public Hearing May 15, 2012 State Aid Variance Committee Meeting June 28, 2012 Bid Opening August 7, 2012 Award Contract August 21, 2012 Begin Construction September 10, 2012 Complete Construction November 16, 2012 • • - this page left intentionally blank - • • APPENDIX Figure 7.10 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.11 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update — Bicycle Facilities Exhibit 1 Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Route Exhibit 2 Metro Transit Bus Stop Location Map ➢ Certification Page ➢ Petition to the City Council dated April 13, 2010 ➢ Open House Letters to Property Owners Dated March 13, 2012 ➢ Open House Ad Publication in the Edina Sun dated March 15, 2012 ➢ Open House Letters to Agencies Dated March 19, 2012 ➢ Open House Attendance Roster Dated March 27, 2012 ➢ Notice of Public Hearing dated April 3, 2012 • - this page left intentionally blank - • • LEGEND: ®Exts� - Pro ppoosed School/ Proppoosed Note. Park Pathways are indudedonFig" 7.11 Skterralk Bustness Sidecialk State -Aid Sidewalk �a A.,y 4 � e tiy, K 4 L 4 City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Sidewalk Facilities Figure 7.10 v - this page left intentionally blank - r� 0 0 LEGEND: Existing Existing Hennepin = - Proposed I From the 2007 Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan Park Pathway County Corridors Park Pathway — — — Primary Route - — — Secondary Route e City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Bicycle Facilities Figure 7.11 - this page left intentionally blank - 0 0 so 1 611 0 � a T ►m • Ln N "a L a 0 7 C > % =1 0 m a °c. c c 0 r ° cc_vla cU s Y ._ O O a 0 .- M +� o a O Z y ° o O �+ • 0 'i O ° ° Uj ° , • O • ii y :,.r-: r .,_.,:..,.�,ss.,.;. :�.: �a O••0° 1 deal -i-e..mu+moenisb:.ab -. c4�.-p_:r aw.:i 72D 0 � _. .., _..v �, 0 C �' 0 "Ifl C W M ° O. OW 0 Uc -a N U cc a o ~ N u N ° O N c ° O m 0 -° r T ° • 1 f • • • • rl Q M rn • � c 1 0 O 1 m � °10 • • s1°0 0 0 0 0 0 o ° •e® o O r o °0 M a C w 00 ° a0 .. a \ Oo a 14 o N _ 0 v L ® U ~ �' ® 00 0 cV `c ca 0 mf°®z 2 00 O 00 •0 „ 3 ' •oo O 000 C 1 • 0! O_ C • ® c6 1n(140 9fi to c ,J EXHIBIT 1 V N 0 L c O ■cn W ■c z o 0 0 .L� r 0 4 �. 0 w 0] X w aD 0 a 0 a U y Y lII d d it O F_ `Y - this page left intentionally blank - • • METRO TRANSIT SUS STOP LOCATION MAP • �tQP(�iK�mAT6 �XISTInlG �.oGA�''toN 0'F �u5 SCf.7 W. - this page left intentionally blank - • • FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA -382 GALLAGHER DRIVE ROADWAY AND NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS SEH No. EDINA 119130 April 12, 2012 hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional • Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota Tob use, PE Date: 4Lic. No.: 43364 Reviewed by: e424"eame �_ 4/12/12 Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343-9301 952.912.2600 0 - this page left intentionally blank - • • . `14A. .� City of Edina, Minnesota o e t, ' CITY COUNCIL En foC?s }° 4801 West 50'h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 • ,, <,�• (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER E�PfRMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE RECEIVED: ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING [❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. ) , / ' V between '7'� �l C� and �2� Cn LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. 2IRYOWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS PURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) r��E r IV A" O tr ISA PS 1 F. iZ NR RS rb r'AM Soo 4& AR MfmAp o4 3 U 73 "d'7160 This s circulated by: �� r 41 NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 S1°F�o' - this page left intentionally blank - • U 0 • March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear France Equities LLC: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. • The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse _sehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\11 ITR NOS\BA382 Gallagher_ France & Parklawn(Petitioned)\DESIGNUNFORMATIONAL MEETING 0 March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear Edina 300 LTD Partnership: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan • and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse sehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer 1� GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTS\HVIPR NOS\BA382 Gallagher—France & Parklawn(Petitioned)\DESIGMJNFORMATIONAL MEETING 0 March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear Edina Cedars LTD Partnership: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan • and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse(cDsehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer 0 G.TWENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIVTROJECTSUMPR NOS\13A382 Gallagher_Prance & Parklawn (Petitioned)\DESIGN\INFORMATIONAL MEETING 0 March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear Mr. Dean Akins: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse _sehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer • GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DI"ROJECTS\IbffR NOS\BA382 Gallagher_France &Parklsw(Petitioned)\DESIGN\iNFORMATTONAL MEETING 0 March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear 7300 Office Condominiums: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse(a)_sehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer 0 GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\MTR NOS\BA382 Gallagher_Prance & Parklawn(Petitioned)\DESIGNUNFORMATIONAL MEETING March 13, 2012 RE: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Dear Heatherton Condominiums: The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as a property owner or an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan . and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please inform your tenants so that they can also attend the meeting. Please contact Project Manager, Toby Muse with Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. Toby can be reached at tmuse _sehinc.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. City Engineer • GAMCENTRAL SVCS\ENG DMPROJECTSTAPR NOS\BA382 Gallagher_France & Parklawn(Petitioned)\DESIGN\IIVFORMATIONAL MEETING City of Edina (Official Publication) Open House Gallagher Drive Reconstruction and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (Between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue) An open house is scheduled for Tuesday, March 27, 2012, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavillion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South for the public to learn about the proposed plans and to provide input for the Gallagher Drive Reconstruction and the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON MARCH 15 AND 22, 2012 BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. • • - this page left intentionally blank - t � 0 • SEH March 19, 2012 0 Dear Agency Stakeholder: RE: City of Edina Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction SEH No. EDINA 119130 14.00 The City of Edina is planning improvements to Gallagher Drive that will incorporate a segment of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail between Parklawn Avenue and France Avenue during the fall of 2012. You have been identified as an agency stakeholder in the project area. You are invited to an open house on Tuesday, March 27, 5:00 to 6:30 p.m., in the Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park, 7499 France Avenue South, Edina. The open house will be informal and provide you a chance to view the preliminary plan and provide input to the project team. Please see a project location map labeled Figure 1 on the back side of this letter. Please contact me if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend the open house and would like more information about the project. I can be reached at tmuse@sehine.com or 952.912.2616. Sincerely, JToob. Muse, PE Manager ka Enclosure c: Wayne Houle, City of Edina Sharon Allison, City of Edina Paul Pasko, SEH Veronica Anderson, SEH pilaelekd eu\I 191]011-genQl6-mtet�3 19 12 aicncy ltf.docz Short Elliott Hendrickson 1110.,-10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I vn>tv sehiite:com 1 952.912.2600 1 $00.734.6757 1 952.912.2.601 fax - this page left intentionally blank - 0 0 4-W, • • -'W* - this page left intentionally blank - • • I r0,h AOPEN HOUSE � SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Edina, MN Project Manager: Toby Muse, PE Date of Meeting: March 27, 2012 Time of Meeting: 5:00 p.m. Location: Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park 7499 France Avenue South SEN No.: EDINA 119130 16.00 Please Print Name: VI -V `^-t IU t CY --6(XCIC (40 ki Name: Address: `,k i D-6!-�t��tf,',rt X33 Address: Name: A- u tj 'ti c3 Name: Address: I'Zo A -V -e- 4(33,5- Address: Name: L 'n&? Name: Address: -11)-6 pitrtcla,,Am A -ye V'Address: n Name:Name: f la_v,�� jG Address: Address: % / �s-� ;��z- 1 �' S, "o CLI Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: pAae\e\edina\119130\1-gent\16-meet\032712 open house\attendance roster 3 27 12.docx 01.04 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 I SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehine.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax t AOPEN HOUSE SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Edina, MN Project Manager: Toby Muse, PE Date of Meeting: March 27, 2012 Time of Meeting: 5:00 p.m. Location: Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park 7499 France Avenue South SEH No.:. EDINA 119130 16.00 • Name:' Address:. % Please Print �4/� /�E�/ Name: I_ O_C7,+l- 44 )6ZJV r'�31"—Address: Name: Qy "" ���- Name: Address: �! Address: Name: 01.04 Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: • Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: pAae\e\edinaV 19130\t-genl\16-meet\032712 open houselattendance roster 3 27 IV= 01.04 • Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343.9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax c 4 OPEN HOUSE r SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: Gallagher Drive Street Reconstruction Edina, MN Project Manager: Toby Muse, PE 0 Date of Meeting: March 27, 2012 Time of Meeting: 5:00 p.m. Location: Hughes Pavilion at Centennial Lakes Park 7499 France Avenue South SEH No.: EDINA 119130 16.00 Please Print Name:' / Name: Address: 1 ���Xd��� Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Address: Name: Name: Address: Address: p:\ae\e\edina\119130\1-genl\16-meet\032712 open house\attendance roster 3 27 12.docx 01.04 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 888.908.8166 fax 714 • • r: RESOLUTION NO. 2012-56 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR MAY 15, 2012 FOR GALLAGHER DRIVE ROADWAY AND NINE MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -382 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 15th day of May, 2012, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider Gallagher Drive Roadway and Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Improvement; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: April 3, 2012 0 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 3, 2012, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk - this page left intentionally blank - • 0 • • REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: April 19, 2012 Subject: Transportation Options Working Group — Election of Co -Chair Agenda Item No.: VI.C. ACTION: ® Recommendation/Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Recommendation/Motion: Elect Co -Chair for the Transportation Options Working Group. Info/Background: A member of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) is required to be a Chair or Co - Chairs for a working group such as the Transportation Options Working Group. Past ETC Member Schold Davis was the Chair of this working group. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012 R&R\20120419\20120419 Item VI C Transportation Options Working Group- Election of Co- chair.docx • • 0 REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: April 19, 2012 Subject: Bike Edina Task Force — March 8, 2012 Minutes Agenda Item No.: VI.D.ii. ACTION: ❑ Recommendation/Motion ❑ Discussion ® Information Attachments: • Bike Edina Task Force — March 8, 2012 Minutes G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012 R&R\20120419\20120419 Item VI D ii Bike Edina Task Force -March 8, 2012 Minutes.docx SIKE f1 EDiNA Bike Edina Task Force: News & Meeting Outcomes March 8, 2012 Purpose: The Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) meets to serve citizens and partner with City staff and elected officials to promote bicycle improvements in Edina for education, encouragement, infrastructure, enforcement, and ongoing assessment. We support implementation of the approved City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan that serves all levels of bicyclists, connects key destinations including safe routes to schools, and integrates with the Twin Cities' regional bike network. Our vision is a progressive bicycle -friendly community where citizens can integrate cycling into their daily lives. Time & Location: BETF monthly on the 2nd Thursday of each month at 8 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room at Edina City Hall. For questions contact Peter Kelley, Chair. Guests are welcome. Distribution: BETF, guests, City Manager, City Engineer, Edina Police BETF Liaison Sgt. Timothy Olson, SHIP contact Robyn Wiesman, and Mayor & City Council. Also, Jack Sullivan to forward to the Edina Transportation Commission, and Dianne Plunkett Latham to post for the Edina Energy and Environment Commission. • Present: Alex Johnson, Jennifer Janovy, Peter Kelley, Tom Randall, Larry Olson, Brad Schaeppi, Carl Follstad, Kirk Johnson • Absent: Alice Hulbert, Carl Gulbronson, Ellen Jones, Don Eyberg, Sally Dunn, Rob Erickson, Marty Mathis • Guests: None • Recorded by: Kirk Johnson & Peter Kelley 1. Chair role: Peter Kelley is now the sole chair for BETF. Brad Schaeppi will continue to serve with the BETF and focus on specific topics at the time. The group thanked Brad for his accomplishments and everyone was comfortable and supportive for Peter's leadership. 2. Tracy Avenue project update: Peter review the project for improvements on Tracy between Vernon and Benton. Bicycle lanes, 5 feet both side. West side will have a full • gutter pan to avoid any longitudinal seam; east side will abut parking lane with bump outs. a. Observed that some Tracy neighbors were in favor of the bicycle lanes. b. BETF inputs at the meeting: Peter gave a summary commentary at the meeting for rationale in support for bicycle lanes; Alex Johnson also provided an opening set of remarks; Alice Hulbert also spoke in support of the project. c. Outcome summary: Council approved the project as proposed however not including the roundabout (vote was passed 4-1 in favor of the project; dissenting vote was because one councilmember was in favor of the roundabout). Timing of the project would be ideally summer -fall 2012. This results in 2,200 feet of road improvements. 3. Bike Boulevard Project a. Project is still active, waiting for approval from MNDot. b. Advisory lanes are being explored: No center lanes, dotted lines on edge. c. Stay tuned for an upcoming open house and plan to attend. 4. Other Infrastructure Improvements a. Cahill, West 70th, Valley View, Antrim: Striping project is being planned. b. Blake Avenue curve where bicycle lanes disappear: Wayne Houle will be working on this gap later this year (need easement from property owner). c. 58th Street improvements (expanding bike lanes to 5 feet): Gutter pans will be put • in place but not until improvements are underway for the street overall. 5. Bicycle Racks near 50th and France a. Brad Schaeppi agreed to follow-up with Transit for Livable Communities (TLC). b. Installations could start soon, depending on action from TLC. c. Discussion on how bicycle facilities can help people shift their transportation modes from automobiles to bicycles. 6. Edina Transportation Commission Update a. Bloomington Public Heath received $30,000 for Safe Routes to School to use for Edina. A committee of City and school district, ETC, BETF will likely be formed, led by Robyn Wiesman. b. Two new key positions to serve the City: i. City of Edina is hiring a Transportation Planner. The position will be staffed by someone that will provide planning that includes the pedestrian and bicycling experience. ii. City of Edina is hiring a Public Works Director. iii. For both positions, the BETF recommends that this person has expertise with bicycle facilities. Peter Kelley advised that BETF Chair or delegate to have periodic interactions with people in these key positions. 7. Bicycle Rodeo • a. April 21St 10 a.m. to noon at Cornelia Elementary. • b. Larry Olson continues to lead this. c. Contact Larry for volunteering and sign up; the more volunteers the better. It is a fun job and you will get trained at the beginning of the event. d. Carl Follstad will follow-up with Sun Current for preparation for this event. 8. Tour de Edina a. Contemplating locating it on east side of Edina b. Meetings are facilitated by Mary Brindle c. BETF representative is Marty Mathis and/or Brad Schaeppi 9. "Edina Dialog" Table wanted — Sponsored by the Edina Energy & Environment Commission a. Paul Thompson of the EEC has requested BETF participation at this event. b. April 19th, Thursday. Tom Randall will assist staffing a table. Carl Follstad will join Tom, depending on travel plans. c. BETF members will be reminded to bring items for the table at our April 19th meeting (e.g., banner, maps, T-shirts, wallet cards, etc.). Peter Kelley will send a reminder prior to the next meeting. 10. Other news a. City of Minneapolis hired Shaun Murphy as a bicycling coordinator. Peter Kelley advocated having a BETF person to be in contact with this group. All are encouraged to think about it. Kirk Johnson will consider it. • b. Blog Article Brainstorming: Objective is to have at least two per month. Members are encouraged to select ideas they would like to write about (or add to this list) i. Bicycle rodeo ii. Biking the roundabouts iii. How does my son or daughter begin biking to school iv. Biking to downtown Minneapolis from Edina (transportation) v. Bicycle trails — access from Edina, favorite trails, etc. vi. Biking to the Greenway from Edina vii. Scenic areas viii. Before and after shots (e.g., West 70th Street) ix. Properly locking a bike (Brad S.); using a standard bike rake, alternatives, what's legal x. Biking in the winter xi. Stopping at stop signs xii. What bring on bicycle trips xiii. Bicycle maintenance tips xiv. "Am I a vehicle or a pedestrian?" xv. New bike racks 50th and France xvi. Project updates — every time there is news • xvii. Tracy Avenue project update (e.g., post lane status) • • :7 xviii. Edina bicycle infrastructure improvements xix. Winter maintenance for bicycle lanes and how to report issues xx. Enjoying bicycling through all ages (e.g., a senior perspective, kid perspective) xxi. Shopping with your bike xxii. Helmets — proper fit, angle xxiii. Humor, positive... xxiv. Business experience for bicycle friendly xxv. Interesting experience ("Today on my bike...") xxvi. Getting a ticket (Marty Mathis) xvvii. Getting passed by other bikers (Tom) xxviii. Putting your bike on the bus k is 0 REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Edina Transportation Commission From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: April 19, 2012 Subject: France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements Update Info/Background: Agenda Item No.: VI.D.iiv. ACTION: ❑ Recommendation/Motion ❑ Discussion ® Information As recommended by City staff the City Council approved the attached proposal for engineering services for the France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements. The City Council was very concerned about the urban design component of this proposal. WSB had appropriated budget for an urban designer, but had not identified one in the proposal. Chuck Richart with WSB will be attending to give an update on the proposed project and their proposed Urban Designer. Please note the schedule on last page of the proposal. Staff would like to discuss some potential dates for the Stake Holder meetings. Attachments: • April 3, 2012 City Council Report / Recommendation: Consultant Engineering Services — France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements G:\Engineering\Infrastructure\Streets\Traffic\TRANSP COMM\Agendas\2012 RSR\20120419\20120419 Item VI D iv France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements Update.docx • s • REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. L. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: April 3, 2012 Subject: Consultant Engineering Services — France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize City Manager to approve attached Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvements. proposal for Engineering Services for France INFORMATIONIBACKGROUND: Attached is a proposal from WSB & Associates, Inc. for engineering services for the France Avenue pedestrian crossing improvements. The City of Edina was successful in our application for rescoping and sunset date extension for the France Avenue Pedestrian Bridge; which means the $1,000,000 of Federal Transportation Enhancement funding for this project was retained. The new sunset date is March 31, 2013; therefore we need to be very aggressive to stay on schedule with this project, see project schedule in proposal. The proposed fee for this project, which includes project development, detail design / bidding, and construction services, is $265,070.00. ATTACHMENTS: Engineering Proposal France Avenue Pedestrian Crossing Improvements g:\pw\central secs\bridges\franca avenue pedestrian bridge\franca Intersectlons\item N.I, consultant engineering services for trance avenue pedestrian crossing lmprovements.docx A . WSB d Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction March 29, 2012 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works/City Engineer Edina Public Works 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55349 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541-4600 Fax: 763 541-1700 Re: Project Development and Design Proposal France Avenue Pedestrian Crossings Improvements (S.P. 120-020-037) Dear Mr. Houle: WSB & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to provide preliminary and final design engineering as well as construction engineering services for the proposed federally funded pedestrian crossing improvements along France Avenue. Our project team will be lead by Mr. Chuck Rickart. He will serve as project manager and coordinate all activities with the City. He will be assisted by Andrew Plowman who will be the lead design engineer. Based on the Met Council approved scope change and sunset date extension a scope of work has been developed and is attached for your information. The estimated cost for the engineering services through construction is based on our current hourly rates, and is estimated at $265,070. Also included is a breakdown of cost by task and the proposed schedule which outlines the required steps to secure the federal funds by March 2013 and construction the summer of 2013. If the proposed Scope of Work and the associated fee appear to be appropriate, please sign a copy of the proposal and return to me at your earliest connivance. We will proceed immediately upon receipt of the signed contract. Thank you for consideration of WSB & Associates, Inc. for these professional engineering services. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to give me a call at 763-287-7183. Sincerely, WSB & ASSOCIATES, INC. Charles T. Rickart, PE, PTOE Principal/Project Manager CITY OF EDINA Authorized Signature Its 9 Date Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer • 9 FRANCE AVENUE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS S.P. 120-020-037 PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAND DESIGN ENGINEERING PROPOSAL CITY OF EDINA, MN INTRODUCTION The City of Edina was successful in 2007 in securing Federal Transportation Enhancement funding for the 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge over France Avenue. As a result of several studies, change in policy direction and new leadership at the City the concept of a bridge over France Avenue was deemed no longer practical. The City then requested and was granted a Scope Change and a one year Sunset Date extension for the project. The re -scoped project will accomplish the same goals, safely and efficiently, for less overall cost, in partnership with the other agencies and with greater community support. The vision for the re - scoped project stems from the County's "France Avenue Corridor Study" completed in 2009. Intersection enhancements such as; median refuge island, accessible pedestrian signals, pedestrian warning signs, enhanced pedestrian corner treatments, etc, will be provided at three primary intersections. 6e Street: This proposed crossing would provide access to; medical buildings, Southdale Mall, Aquatic Center, Rosland Park, TLC Bike Boulevard, and access to transit. 700'Street: This proposed crossing would continue the complete street project recently constructed west of France Avenue. It would serve primarily single family neighborhood, The Galleria, Target, Promenade, Southdale Library, Hennepin County Government Center, and access to transit. 76" ` Street: This proposed crossing would serve primarily multi -family housing and connect to Centennial Lakes Park, Promenade, Three Rivers Park District Nine mile trail in Richfield, Edinborough Park, medical facilities, and access to transit. Three Rivers Park District (TRPD) is also planning improvements to Gallagher Drive. Although this intersection will be improved by TRPD the proposed crossing will serve the future planned regional trail, Promenade, multi -family housing, and access to transit. In addition to the intersection enhancements the proposed project will provide missing sidewalk connections insuring that all areas on both sides of France Avenue have an opportunity to access one of the planned crossing locations. Scope of Services Page 1 • L� • The City has worked with several agencies during the preliminary studies, concept development and the proposed re -scoping of the project since the original TE application was submitted and approved. These agencies have included: • Hennepin County Community Works • Hennepin County Transportation • Three Rivers Park District • Transit for Livable Communities • Metro Transit Base on the proposed change in scope the following estimated cost was developed accommodating improvements to the three (3) crossings of France Avenue. It is assumed that the Gallagher Drive intersection improvements would be completed by TRPD. These costs are based on preliminary concept plans and will be refined during final design. Revised project cost estimate: Intersection improvements $ 1,005,000 Revised signal system $ 600,000 Signing and Striping $ 36,000 Trail / Sidewalk $ 54,000 Retaining walls $ 150,000 Guard rail $ 50,000 Lighting $ 80,000 Traffic Control $ 20,000 Landscaping $ 50,000 Total Cost $ 2,045,000 The following Scope of Work outlines the required tasks to complete each phase: Phase 1— Project Development (preliminary design, environmental documents, right-of-way plan and descriptions), Tasks 1— 6 Phase 2 — Detail Design / Bidding (final design, cost estimates, permits, approvals, contract documents and bidding), Tasks 6 —10 Phase 3 — Construction Administration (observation, documentation, administration, survey), Task 11 Following the Scope of Work a summary of the Estimated Fee and an anticipated Project Schedule is included. Scope of Services Page 2 0 SCOPE OF WORK Phase 1— Project Development Task 1— Proiect Management This task will include the day-to-day management of the project including all correspondence with City of Edina staff, preparation of monthly progress reports, and invoices. In addition, this task will include meeting with City staff to review the progress of the project and discuss any issues associated with the project through the design and bidding phases. It is estimated that six meetings will be held throughout the project. Task 2 — Data Collection / Survey / Base Manning Available data will be collected from the City and other impacted agencies along France Avenue. is WSB will work with the City of Edina and Hennepin County in securing the GIS data for the corridor and any topographic information available. In addition design surveys will be completed for the areas 661h Street, 70th Street and 76th Street, as well as the anticipated area's where sidewalk connections are proposed. The result of this task will be the preparation of a topographic base mapping suitable for preparation of construction documents and right of way acquisition. Hours Project Principal 2 Project Manager 4 Project Engineer 12 Survey Crew 32 Technician 40 Total Hours 98 Task 3 — Preliminary Design (30% Plans) Preliminary plans will be prepared showing: • Horizontal and vertical alignment of proposed improvements to each intersection and sidewalk / trail segments, • Details of the proposed pedestrian enhancements, • • ADA / TPAR Requirements • Identification of required signal improvements, Scope of Services Page 3 Hours Project Principal 16 Project Manager 40 Project Engineer 8 Total Hours 64 Task 2 — Data Collection / Survey / Base Manning Available data will be collected from the City and other impacted agencies along France Avenue. is WSB will work with the City of Edina and Hennepin County in securing the GIS data for the corridor and any topographic information available. In addition design surveys will be completed for the areas 661h Street, 70th Street and 76th Street, as well as the anticipated area's where sidewalk connections are proposed. The result of this task will be the preparation of a topographic base mapping suitable for preparation of construction documents and right of way acquisition. Hours Project Principal 2 Project Manager 4 Project Engineer 12 Survey Crew 32 Technician 40 Total Hours 98 Task 3 — Preliminary Design (30% Plans) Preliminary plans will be prepared showing: • Horizontal and vertical alignment of proposed improvements to each intersection and sidewalk / trail segments, • Details of the proposed pedestrian enhancements, • • ADA / TPAR Requirements • Identification of required signal improvements, Scope of Services Page 3 • Identification of the required right of way, any temporary construction easements needed, • Preliminary landscaping plans • Drainage and utility impacts. The preliminary design will provide enough data to complete and submit the project environmental documentation (Project Memorandum). Hours Project Principal 12 Project Manager 36 Project Engineer 54 Landscape Architect 8 Technician 60 Total Hours 170 Task 4 — Proiect Environmental Documentation (Proiect Memorandum) WSB will prepare a Project Memorandum (PM) as required for the project, in accordance with the MnDOT Highway Project Development Process Manual and current Standards and practices that will meet the requirements for Federal funding. This document will include review of all potential environmental impacts / issues including, but not limited to; flood plain, wetland, endangered species, historical / archeological, noise, air quality, right of way, etc. A preliminary copy of the PM will be submitted to the City of Edina, Hennepin County and MnDOT State Aid for review, any comments will be addressed, and a final copy for signature will be prepared and submitted to MnDOT and the County for final approval. Hours Project Principal 6 Project Manager 24 Project Engineer 40 Technician 12 Total Hours 82 Task 5 — Rieht of Way Plan / Descriptions As part of the Preliminary Design, Task 3, WSB will identify the right -of way required for the project. Based on the identified right of way we will prepare parcel sketches for use in preparing legal descriptions. These sketches and descriptions will be provided to the City for the acquisition purposes. This task does not include appraisals. Hours Project Principal 4 Project Manager 24 Project Engineer 16 Technician 36 Total Hours 80 Scope of Services Page 4 0 Task 6 — Agency / Stakeholder Coordination In order to insure that the proposed improvements meet the expectations of stakeholders and elected officials, it is anticipated that a series of meetings will be held to solicit input and present preliminary plans and ideas. The first meeting will be early in the process and will involve identifying the parameters and requirements from the City, Hennepin County and MnDOT. This meeting will also include a presentation of possible improvements and receiving additional ideas from the attendees. The second meeting will present the proposed plan for improvement and receive additional input on the proposal. In addition to the Stakeholder meetings, meetings with Hennepin County, Metro Transit, Three Rivers Park District and MnDOT will be held as needed. It is assumed that one meeting with each will be held during the Project Development phase. Hours Project Principal 24 Project Manager 24 Project Engineer 24 Landscape Architect 8 Technician 8 Total Hours 88 is Phase 2 — Detail Design / Bidding is Task 7 — Final Design WSB will perform design computations, calculate quantities and prepare final design plans. The final construction plan set will be in conformance with all MnDOT State Aid and Federal Aid requirements and include: 1. Title Sheet 2. General Layout 3. Removals 4. Statement of Estimated Quantities 5. Soils and Construction Notes 6. Utility Tabulations 7. Quantity Tabulations 8. Typical Sections 9. Details 10. Alignment Plans and Tabulations 11. Construction Plans and Profiles 12. Grading, Erosion Control, and Turf Establishment Plans 13. Traffic Signal Plans 14. Signing and Striping Plans 15. Cross Sections 16. Landscaping Plans Scope of Services Page 5 Final plans will be submitted to the City for review and requested changes incorporated. The revised plans will then be submitted to the County and MnDOT State Aid for review. Once the County and MnDOT comments have been incorporated, a final copy of the plans will be submitted for signature. A copy of the plan in electronic format will be provided to the City. Hours Project Principal 60 Project Manager 108 Project Engineer 140 Landscape Architect 56 Technician 200 Total Hours 564 Task 8 — Construction Cost Estimate WSB will prepare a construction cost estimate at the Preliminary Plan and Final Plan points in the project to establish and refine the estimated construction cost. Additionally, we will tabulate the construction cost splits based on Federal and local cost participation based on funding levels. Task 9 — Permits / Approvals WSB will coordinate and submit the project for review and / or approval from the following agencies. For any permits required WSB will prepare the permit for City signature and submit the permit on the Cities behalf. • City of Edina • Mn/DOT Federal Aid (Metro District and Central Office) • Hennepin County • WSD • MPCA — NPDES • US Corps of Engineers • MnDNR Hours Project Principal 12 Project Manager 24 Project Engineer 20 • Technician 8 Total Hours 64 Scope of Services Page 6 Hours Project Principal 4 Project Manager 12 Project Engineer 20 Landscape Architect 12 Technician 8 Total Hours 56 Task 9 — Permits / Approvals WSB will coordinate and submit the project for review and / or approval from the following agencies. For any permits required WSB will prepare the permit for City signature and submit the permit on the Cities behalf. • City of Edina • Mn/DOT Federal Aid (Metro District and Central Office) • Hennepin County • WSD • MPCA — NPDES • US Corps of Engineers • MnDNR Hours Project Principal 12 Project Manager 24 Project Engineer 20 • Technician 8 Total Hours 64 Scope of Services Page 6 Task 10 — Bidding / Contract Documents WSB will prepare Special Provisions for all items, details, designs and procedures for the project which are not covered in the project's governing specifications (MnDOT's Standard Specifications for Construction) or the current Supplemental Specifications. The provision for each item will contain a description, materials, construction requirements, method of measurement and basis of payment. WSB will prepare the final bid package for distribution to prospective bidders. The bid package will include all documents required for the Federal funding. It is assumed that the City will provide the boiler plate information including contract documents and standard City specifications in electronic format. WSB will provide information necessary for the advertisement of bids and distribution of bid packages. We will be available to address any questions including issuing any addendums if required through the bidding process. WSB will be in attendance at the bid opening and will verify the bids and will make a recommendation of award to the City. Hours Project Principal 8 Project Manager 20 Project Engineer 32 . Landscape Architect 12 Technician 16 C� I Total Hours 88 Phase 3 — Construction Administration Task 10 — Construction Administration WSB will follow the Delegated Contract Process (DCP) outlined by MnDOT for construction contract administration. The WSB Project Manager will be responsible for all construction administration activities. At the beginning of the project, a preconstruction conference will be conducted. During the course of the project, weekly construction progress meetings will be conducted by the Project Manager. Periodic visits to the site will be made by the Project Manager. The project Manager/Engineer will be responsible for preparing all pay estimates, change orders, reviewing shop drawings, materials and suppliers, and preparing the final acceptance letter. The Project Manager/Engineer will provide coordination to all utility companies, property owners, surveyors, and all project personnel. Prior to construction, WSB will provide staking for the construction phase. WSB will also provide day-. to -day on-site observation and record keeping of the construction and activities consistent with all MnDOT Federal Aid requirements, the DCP, as well as providing coordination and record keeping for contractor invoice approvals, change orders, and other construction coordination. Scope of Services Page 7 • Total Hours 1260 The above estimate of hours is based on assuming a 16 to 20 week construction time frame. Once the project has been bid, a contractor on board and a construction schedule provided a more detail hourly estimated can be provided. Scope of Services Page 8 Hours Project Principal 40 Project Manager 80 Project Engineer 96 Landscape Architect 32 Const Observer 900 Survey Crew 80 Technician 32 Total Hours 1260 The above estimate of hours is based on assuming a 16 to 20 week construction time frame. Once the project has been bid, a contractor on board and a construction schedule provided a more detail hourly estimated can be provided. Scope of Services Page 8 0 ESTIMATED FEE • 11 Based on the hours outlined for each task and WSB fee schedule (attached), it is estimated that the cost for design and construction engineering services will be as outlined below: WSB will only proceed with one Phase of the project as they are authorized by the City. The schedule on the follow page indicates when each phase would need to be authorized in anticipation of funding authorization by March 2013 and construction in the summer of 2013. Scope of Services Page 9 Phase 1— Project Development Task I — Project Management $7,544.00 Task 2 — Data Collection /Survey /Mapping $11,238.00 Task 3 — Preliminary Design $17,226.00 Task 4 — Project Environmental Document $8,586.00 Task 5 — Right -of -Way Plan / Descriptions $8,072.00 Task 6—Agency /Stakeholder Coordination $9,904.00 Expenses $500.00 :___ Tota has 1wQst =3 Q7UQ Phase 2 - Detail Design / Bidding Task 7- Final Design $57,736.00 Task 8 - Construction Cost Estimate $5,796.00 Task 9 - Permits /Approvals $7,072.00 Task 10 - Bidding/ Contract Documents $9,156.00 Expenses $500.00 3� iil�hase Cot Phase 3 - Construction Task 11- Construction Administration $121,740.00 APREWME! ME �'aiole�ost0 ON — - _ — WSB will only proceed with one Phase of the project as they are authorized by the City. The schedule on the follow page indicates when each phase would need to be authorized in anticipation of funding authorization by March 2013 and construction in the summer of 2013. Scope of Services Page 9 • SCHEDULE Based on a typical Scope of Work and the Federal funding process guidelines, the following schedule would be anticipated: Phase 1— Project Development Noticeto Proceed Phase 1............................................................................................ April 3, 2012 City Staff Kick-off Meeting.......................................................................... Week of April 9, 2012 Data Collection / Survey............................................................................... Week of April 9, 2012 Submit Agency Review Letters (MnDNR, SHPO, Etc) ............................. Week of April 16, 2012 Meeting with Hennepin County.................................................................. Week of April 16, 2012 Stakeholder Group Meeting #I ................................................................... Week of April 30, 2012 Draft PM / Prel Design Plan to City........................................................................... May 18, 2012 City Staff Review Meeting...........................................................................Week of May 28, 2012 Stakeholder Group Meeting#2.......................................................................Week of June 4, 2012 Draft PM / Prcl Design Plan to MnDOT and County ................................................. June 22, 2012 MnDOT/ County Review..........................................................................................Up to 6 Weeks Address MnDOT and County comments ......................... Weeks of August 6 and August 13, 2012 Final PM / Prel Design Plan to MnDOT and County ............................................ August 17, 2012 Final MnDOT and County Approval of PM.............................................................Up to 5 Weeks PMApproved............................................................................................................October 2012 Construction Limits Determined................................................................................. May 18, 2012 Right of Way Plan to City and County................................................................... ... June 1, 2012 Initial Parcel Work and Landowner Notification ....................................................May / June 2012 ParcelDescriptions and Exhibits....................................................................................... July 2012 Right of Way Appraisals...........................................................................August / September 2012 Right of Way Acquisition (Offers)............................................................................. October 2012 Titleand Possession................................................................................................. December 2012 R/W Certificate#1................................................................................................ December 2012 Phase 2 — Detail Design / Bidding Notice to Proceed Phase 2..................................................................August 7, 2012 Draft (60%) Final Plan Submittal to City, County and Mn/DOT..................... September 28, 2012 City Staff / County / MnDOT Review Meetings ..................................... Week of October 8, 2012 MnDOT, County and City Review.............................................................................Up to 8 weeks AddressComments................................................................................................. December 2012 Final Plan Submittal to MnDOT / County and City .......................................... December 21, 2012 FinalMnDOT Approval of Plans..............................................................................Up to 8 Weeks FinalApproved Plans................................................................................................. March 2013 Advertisingfor Bids..............................................................................................April / May 2013 BidOpening...................................................................................................................... May 2013 Phase 3 — Construction Administration Notice to Proceed Phase 3......................................................................June 4, 2013 BeginConstruction..................................................................................................... June 15, 2013 • Complete Construction................................................................................................October 2013 Scope of Services Page 10 • Apri120, 2012 Mr. Steve Kotke City Engineer - City of Minneapolis 350 S Fifth Street Room 203 City Hall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Ciofof Edina Bicycle Boulevard — Phase 1 54t Street (France Avenue to Zenith Avenue) Dear Mr. Kotke: The City of Edina has been awarded federal funds through the Non -motorized Transportation Pilot Program (NMTP) to construct an on -street bicycle facility within our community (SP 120-091-002). Our bike route will encompass several Edina street segments, including Wooddale Avenue, 54th Street, and Valley View Road. The 54th Street segment, between France Avenue and Zenith Avenue, has a shared jurisdiction between the City of Minneapolis and Edina. The purpose of this letter is to start the design coordination process for 54th Street and to determine the required Minneapolis permits and approvals needed to move our project into construction. Based on our current project schedule, we will be submitting our recommended layout for Council Approval on May 15, 2012 and construction plan submittal to Mn/DOT State Aid on May 7, 2012. We are working towards a construction start date in late August of this year, so are in need of City of Minneapolis and Mn/DOT State Aid approval by June 30, 2012. Our preliminary design for 54th Street (east of France Avenue) street segment includes the provision of bicycle pavement markings, bicycle related roadway signs, bike detection at the France Avenue/54thStreet traffic signal and the construction of a traffic circle at Drew Avenue and Beard Avenue. The City of Edina will take responsibility for the maintenance of the proposed traffic circles, including the landscaping. I have attached the preliminary construction plans and pavement marking/signing plans for 54th Street for your staff review. Specifically, we are requesting: • A letter indicating City of Minneapolis support for the project as proposed. This letter is required for Mn/DOT State Aid approval of the Project Memorandum. • Approval for roadway construction (traffic circles) within City of Minneapolis right of way. Note, the traffic circle design is similar to the Minneapolis traffic circles at 5th Street NE/13th Avenue and 15th Avenue NE. • Approval to install roadway signs and pavement markings within City of Minneapolis right of way. • Approval to remove the eastbound and westbound stop signs at the 54th Street/Drew Avenue and 54th Street/Beard Avenue intersections, as required for appropriate operation of the traffic circles. • Approval to add bike detection at the France Avenue/541h Street traffic signal. • Provide direction on the appropriate city permits and/or staff contacts we will need to make. If you have any questions, require further information or would like to meet in regards to our project, please feel free to contact me (direct: 952-826-0443, or email whoule(a),edinamn.gov). Sincerely, City of Edina, Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer 0 Ap 0 Mr. Steve Kotke, PE City Engineer - City of Minneapolis 350 S Fifth Street Room 203 City Hall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Request for letter of support and City of Minneapolis approvals City of Edina Bicycle Boulevard - Phase 1 54th Street (France Avenue to Zenith Avenue) Dear Mr. Kotke: The City of Edina is requesting a letter of support and City of Minneapolis approvals for an adjoining segment of our Bike Boulevard project. Background Information: The City of Edina has been awarded federal funds through the Non -motorized Transportation Pilot Program (NMTP) to construct an on -street bicycle facility within our community (SP 120-091- 002). Our bike route will encompass several Edina street segments, including Wooddale Avenue, 54th Street, and Valley View Road. The 54th Street segment, between France Avenue and Zenith Avenue, has a shared jurisdiction between the City of Minneapolis and Edina. Our preliminary design for 54th Street (east of France Avenue) street segment includes: • Provision of bicycle pavement markings. • Bicycle related roadway signs. • Bike detection at the France Avenue/54thStreet traffic signal. • Construction of a traffic circle at Drew Avenue and Beard Avenue. o The City of Edina will take responsibility for the maintenance of the proposed traffic circles, including the landscaping. Attached are preliminary construction plans and pavement marking/signing plans for 54th Street for your staff review. Requested letters and approval: • A letter indicating City of Minneapolis support for the project as proposed. This letter is required for MNDOT State Aid approval of the Project Memorandum. • Approval for roadway construction (traffic circles) within City of Minneapolis right of way. Note the traffic circle design is similar to the Minneapolis traffic circles at 5th Street NE/13th Avenue and 15th Avenue NE. • Approval to install roadway signs and pavement markings within City of Minneapolis right of way. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 wwwEdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 r ` Page 2 of 2 Mr. Steve Kotke, PE City of Minneapolis • Approval to remove the eastbound and westbound stop signs at the 54th Street/Drew • Avenue and 54th Street/Beard Avenue intersections, as required for appropriate operation of the traffic circles. . • Approval to add bike detection at the France Avenue/54th Street traffic signal. • Provide direction on the appropriate city permits and/or staff contacts we will need to make. Schedule: We will be submitting our recommended layout for City of Edina Council approval on May 15, 2012 and construction plan submittal to MNDOT State Aid on May 7, 2012. We are working towards a construction start date in late August of this year, so are in need of City of Minneapolis and MNDOT State Aid approval by June 30, 2012. Sincerely, . Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer 952-826-0443 whoule@EdinaMN.gov • G:\PW\CENTRAL SVCS\ENG DIV\PROJECTS\IMPR NOS\A238 TLC Bike & Ped Way Phase I\PRELIM DESIGN\Mpls\20120423 Mpls Coordination Letter.doc is Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West Fifty -Fourth Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1432 • Phone: 952.926.3808 • Fax: 952.920.4418 • www.ecic.org April 19, 2012 RECEIVED Attn: Edina Transportation Commission AH 19 2012 CITY OF EDINA Re: Bikeway plans ENGINEERINGDEj Dear Transportation Commissioners: As leaders of Edina Community Lutheran Church, a community with more than 700 members and over 60 years of ministry on 54th Street, we have followed the plans for the proposed bikeway on 54th Street with both excitement and concern. We are supportive of the city's efforts to promote a variety of transportation options for its residents and guests. We support improvements that would make biking and walking safer for people of all ages and abilities. Efforts to slow traffic and make pedestrians safer are especially welcome, since we regularly experience the safety concerns of drivers exceeding the speed limit in front of our building, where both young children and the elderly may be crossing the street. We are deeply concerned, however, about versions of the plan which would eliminate parking on the north side of 54th Street. For these 64 years of ministry and service in Edina we have used on -street parking, an arrangement which reduces additional blacktop near Minnehaha Creek and provides for a friendlier neighborhood streetscape. Forbidding parking on either side of 54th street would significantly hamper our ministry. Our need for safe and adequate parking extends far beyond Sunday mornings. Though staff and small groups use our lots during the week, church and community groups that use our facility need on -street parking many nights of the week. In our letter to city engineers last November, we noted that in October, for example, we hosted twenty-one non -Sunday events, including Alcoholics Anonymous, Edina Lion's Club, and the Edina Grief Coalition. Most of these events are in late afternoon and evening hours. Our prime building usage is during weekend and commuting hours that would overlap with recreational and commuting cyclists. We believe a share -the -road policy could make matters safer for everyone. We hope to be positive partners in this process and will keep our own members informed and engaged as plans move forward. • Pastor Pam Fickenscher Pastor Erik Strand • Urban Design, Planning, and Landscape Architecture Qualifications Submitted to City of Edina, Minnesota Prepared by: Michael Schroeder, ASLA LHB, Inc. 250 Third Avenue North, Suite 450 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 612.752.6966 PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Markets Served: • Commercial • Government • Education • Healthcare • Housing • Industrial • Public Works • Pipeline and Utilities Services Provided: • Architecture • Interior Design • Landscape Architecture • Urban Design + Planning • Civil Engineering • Structural Engineering • Mechanical Engineering • Electrical Engineering • Land Surveying • Performance Metrics– Locations: 250 Third Avenue North, Suite 450 Minneapolis, Minn. 55401 (612) 338-2029 (612) 338-2088 Fax 21 West Superior Street, Suite 500 Duluth, Minn. 55802 (218) 727-8446 (218) 727-8456 Fax ttN DV a eo a�� o � n ENERGYSTAR �ouNc` PARTNEA PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. N LHB, Inc. is a full-service design firm providing services in architecture, landscape architecture, interior design, engineering, and surveying. With a staff of 160, we provide interdisciplinary services from ofIicds in Minneapolis and Duluth. Since 1966, LHB has focused its talents and expertise on providing creative, practical, and cost-effective high-performance design solutions. LHB recognizes that the design process should look far beyond the project bounds. We approach each project with a holistic vision and the understanding that sustainable designs and sustainable client relationships require more than a traditional design philosophy. LHB's design practices not only preserve the earth's fleeting resources but provide substantial financial benefits for the end user by creating healthy, long-lasting, and vibrant environments. The Urban Design and Planning group at LHB is dedicated to providing community design and planning services to communities throughout the Midwest. Using participatory design strategies—ones that truly engage stakeholders—LHB helps a community frame a vision of its future, one that is shared among the many diverse interests of the community, and one that encourages a community to forge a new common language as they move forward. This process, which focuses on exploration and discovery, helps communities better understand themselves, the issues they face, and the opportunities that lie ahead. It creates compelling yet appropriate solutions to tough problems, and allows for a more strategic approach to implementation based on the community's unique resources. But most important, the process creates the lasting belief in the sense of community and the willingness for a community to make investments in themselves, their institutions, and their environment. As a result of our commitment to sustainable design and community involvement, LHB's Urban Design and Planning group works on an incredibly diverse range of projects—from community master planning to high-end residential landscapes, from private developments to public park and trail design, from affordable housing projects to streetscape design. This broad range of projects allows LHB's designers to bring fresh ideas and perspectives to every project type. We don't apply cookie -cutter solutions to our unique projects because we believe that the best designs are a result of a process that responds to the context of each project and provides the end user with the best possible experience. • -1 i't"orale Project Type Neighborhood Revitalization Minneapolis, MN Client Hennepin Counry PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Lowry Avenue Corridor Phase II LHB worked with Hennepin County, the City of Minneapolis, and several neighborhoods along Lowry Avenue in North Minneapolis to complete Phase II of the master plan for a two-mile stretch of this critical urban corridor. This ambitious redesign is revitalizing the neighborhood by improving the corridor's aesthetics, safety, access to public transportation, and opportunities for economic growth. Design goals of the project included congregating services, retail, and office space around transit nodes and effectively linking civic spaces through pedestrian, bicycle, and transit connections. Lowry Avenue will be enhanced with well -lit landscaped boulevards, new sidewalks, and bicycle lanes on both sides of the street. Project Type Urban Design Wayzata, MN Client Wayzata Bay Redevelopment Company J Wayzata Bay Center Redevelopment • r +` A 2i ' 3a *` i . s. w. In the redevelopment of the Wayzata Bay Center, parks and public spaces provide a focal point for retail shops and restaurants, senior and conventional housing, offices, and a hotel to create a vibrant, pedestrian - centered mixed-use district in downtown Wayzata. LHB worked with the client, the City of Wayzata, community members, and a team of architects to shape a master plan for the district. In the plan, the 14 acre site is divided by new streets to create six blocks reflecting the idiosyncratic pattern of blocks found in downtown Wayzata. One of the blocks will become a new public space for the community, prominently located along Lake Street and becoming the centerpiece of the district and a focus for downtown activities. A park and play area along the site's easterly boundary serve project residents and visitors, as well as neighbors living to the east of the site, while enhancing a natural edge to the project. Innovative technologies and sustainable strategies are integrated into the project, providing heating and cooling with geothermal energy, eliminating the need for snow removal equipment and chemicals by heating• streets and sidewalk to melt snow, serving the parking needs of the project without surface parking lots, creating more than two acres of green roofs, and establishing a near -zero runoff solution by infiltrating 100 - year rainfall within the bounds of the site. PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Z :7 • FCI�-, ,`1.: r_- % Project Type Downtown Strategy Plan; River Corridor Master Plan; First Street South Redevelopment Concept; First Street South Design and Development Guidelines Saint Charles, IL Clients City of Saint Charles, Downtown Saint Charles Partnership, and Saint Charles Park District PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Saint Charles Downtown Master Plan* Downtown Saint Charles is nestled along the banks of the Fox River, in a small community 45 miles west of downtown Chicago. The community had already accomplished most of what small towns desire, yet they wanted an even more vibrant downtown and a better riverfront experience for visitors and the community. Michael Schroeder led the creation of urban design and redevelopment elements for a downtown strategic plan; contributed to the creation of a master plan for the downtown reach of the Fox River; and generated a concept and design guidelines for redevelopment of one of downtown's primary corridors. The plans focused on the integration of the downtown and riverfront experiences, particularly for pedestrians. *Experience by Michael Schroeder prior to LHB Opportunities for new investments in downtown were framed for corridors where it could be demonstrated that investment was lacking. Parking strategies were defined, and further explored as locations for a second downtown parking structure were considered. Downtown Saint Charles was awarded the title of "Great American Main Street" by the National Trust for Historic Preservation's National Main Street Center. These projects are the community's attempt to maintain the sense of vitality envisioned by that award. The Downtown Strategy Plan was awarded Illinois' first "Governor's Tomorrow Award," recognizing the sustainable path the plan defined for the future of downtown. - Fort Snelling LRT and Upper Post Master Plan Project Type Master Planning Hennepin County, MN Client Hennepin County PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. The location of a light rail transit station at the historic Upper Post of Fort Snelling presents an unparalleled opportunity to address the long-term use and disposition of the historic properties while integrating new uses and new buildings to revitalize the entire 233 -acre site. Lead consultant CORNEJO CONSULTING teamed with LHB, Inc. and Kimley-Horn Associates to prepare the Fort Snelling LRT and Upper Post Master Plan. e!'7 , This Master Plan incorporates recommendations for preservation and reuse from previous studies and presents new plans for transit -oriented development (TOD), urban design guidelines, and recommendations for transportation and other infrastructure improvements. It also* includes an economic development strategy to bring new investment and new compatible uses. Dan Cornejo led an extensive public involvement program of interviews, an Interagency Staff Advisory Committee, a Task Force of stakeholder groups, and public information meetings and open houses. • • Project P, Ifi Project Type Master Planning Apple Valley, MN Client City of Apple Valley PERFORMANCE DPJ , E " • DE S1 CPQ. Cedar Avenue Transit -Oriented Land Use Planning and Development Evaluation With the advent of bus rapid transit on the Cedar Avenue Corridor, the City of Apple Valley sought the opportunity to begin shaping patterns of development that would be more supportive of transit infrastructure. LHB, Inc., with Cornejo Consulting, framed directions for the evolution of the downtown area consistentwith the principles for transit - oriented design and development, but also looked at ways in which the major arterials in downtown might change in response. An incremental approach is defined for downtown with three stages ofevolution becoming obvious. The first focuses on the start of BRT operations, the moderate changes that could be made to induce transit patronage, and the near term redevelopment opportunities posed by the creation of a BRT transit station. The second stage envisions a change in the arterial roadways with the introduction of an echelon interchange and begins the process of linking the quadrants of downtown that are currently divided byCedarAvenue (TH 77) and Dakota County Road 42 by depressing Cedar Avenue below grade. Finally, in the third stage of downtown's evolution, a "lid" is constructed over Cedar Avenue, the quadrants of downtown are linked by local streets and pedestrian ways, and a significant new public space is created in the heart of downtown. t�roj_ct F'icffle Saint Louis County Union Depot Area • Master Plan Project Type Downtown Master Plan Duluth, MN Client Saint Louis County Planning and Development PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. As an early step in the planning for the Northern Lights Express, a high-speed rail connection between Minneapolis -Saint Paul and Duluth, Saint Louis County and the City of Duluth began planning for the return of passenger train traffic to the historic Union Depot. Part of the planning addressed connections between the Depot and a planned intermodal transportation center on an adjacent site. Significant effort was directed toward the creation of plans for the evolution of properties surrounding the Depot to focus on opportunities derived from enhanced transit. The largest parcel, lying adjacent to the tracks and the Depot, is owned by Saint Louis County and is currently vacant. The TOD master plan demonstrated the potential for the site to_ accommodate a promenade_ overlooking the harbor and Aerial Lift Bridge, parking below street level uses, and a mix of street -level non- residential development with housing above. Staging plans suggested the ways in which the site might evolve, allowing for development to occur even in advance of the implementation of the Northern Lights Express. is Project Type Master Planning Bloomington, MN Client City of Golden Valley PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Douglas Drive Corridor Study Douglas Drive, from Medicine Lake Road at the north to Highway 55 at the south, forms the geographic center line of Golden Valley. The corridor is an important route for the community and links residential neighborhoods, major employer campuses, and a variety of retail areas. The corridor also intersects several railroads, the Luce Line Trail, and Bassett Creek, creating a varied and unique transportation corridor. Despite its assets, Douglas Drive is an aging street, both in terms of infrastructure and development, and it has significant safety issues, especially for pedestrians. Designing a corridor for today's context but expecting it to serve the needs of the community for twenty or more years is not likely to be a successful strategy. Instead, The plan for the corridor seeks to balance immediate needs with a vision for the streetscape and redevelopment that anticipates future needs as much as possible and provides flexibility to serve those needs which can't be imagined now. The Corridor Study suggests the form new development might take, including an industrial campus near Highway 55, ways to accommodate that development with supportive transportation, and design considerations for the streetscape and surrounding developments. Finally, it outlines strategies for implementing the vision. Project Type Planning Services Minneapolis, MN Client Minneapolis Parks and Recreation Board (MPRB) PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. Park Planning Services Coordination 0 As the MPRB transitioned to a new Assistant Superintendent for Planning Services, LHB was retained to coordinate the delivery ofpark planning and design services as well as to assist the Superintendent in assessing directions for the future of the Planning Service department. LHB's efforts included the design and planning for several parks, overseeing permitting and park construction activities, and review of project budgets and monitoring grants for park improvements. LHB provided regular updates on • Planning Services activities to the Superintendent and the Board. LHB proposed procedures that would establish greater consistency among projects and Planning Services staff, and that would better align with existing Park Board policies. And perhaps most important, LHB encouraged internal collaboration among functional groups within the Park Board as new projects were framed and developed. The assignment required LHB staff to office within the Park Board's Planning Services department for approximately eight months. Michael Schroeder, ASLA Director of Urban Design and Planning Registration Michael is a licensed landscape architect with experience in interpretive design, Licensed Landscape historic preservation, streetscape design, master planning, site design, and community Architect in Minnesota planning and design. This expertise has been provided for clients that include non- profits, community and neighborhood groups, private sector entities, and a wide Affiliations - spectrum of municipal, county and state agencies. He specializes on communities City of Edina and the engagement of stakeholders in the design process, with an emphasis on the Planning Commission; relationship between places and the experiences people desire. Massing Task Force; Comprehensive Plan Task Force; Grandview District Michael's projects include urban design consulting for towns and cities in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Connecticut, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Iowa, Framework Plan Georgia, New Mexico, and North Carolina. His past projects include a corporate headquarters master plan for H.B. Fuller Company in Vadnais Heights, Minn.; American Society of an interpretive center for cement manufacturing on a National Scenic Byway in Landscape Architects Missouri; master plans/strategic plans for downtown revitalization work in several Member cities; and on-going consulting for the National Trust for Historic Preservation's Main Street Center. Michael has completed context sensitive design training through Minnesota Landscape the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Kentucky Transportation Arboretum Cabinet. Instructor Project Experience Education • Douglas Drive Corridor Master Plan; Golden Valley, MN • Bachelor of • Wayzata Bay Center Redevelopment; Wayzata, MN Landscape Architecture, • East Phillips Park Community Center; Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota • Airport South District Master Plan; Bloomington, MN • Cedar Avenue BRT Station Area Planning; Apple Valley, MN Recognition • Village Center Master Plan; Pingree Grove, IL 2004 Smart Growth • Main Street Concept; Ohkay Owingeh; NM Design Award, 1000 Friends of • Downtown Development Concept Study; Canton, MO Minnesota: Woodlake Center, . Downtown Strategy Plan; Saint Charles, IL Richfield, MN • Holcim Cement Interpretive Center; Clarksville, MO • Highland Station Master Plan; Highland, MI 2003 Best Practices Award, • Taylors Falls Comprehensive Plan: A Plan of Conservation and Federal Highway Administration Development; Taylors Falls, MN and the National Scenic • Seward/Longfellow/Greenway Area Land Use Plan; Minneapolis, MN Byways Program: Industry • Downtown Master Plan; Hutchinson, MN* and Environment: Finding • Design-Build Program Guidance Documents for Visual Quality Management; Compatibility—Holcim Minnesota Department of Transportation Cement Interpretive Facility and • University of Minnesota Morris Historic Landscape Preservation Master Clarksville Wildlife Refuge Plan; Morris, MN* • Downtown East/North Loop Master Plan; Minneapolis, MN* • Downtown and Lakefront Concept Plan; Branson, MO* • H.B. Fuller Company Corporate Headquarters; Vadnais Heights, MN* • Downtown Framework Plan; Cape Girardeau, MO* • Riverwalk Concept Plan; Taylor Falls, MN* • The New Nicollet Mall; Minneapolis, MN* • I� • Centennial Lakes Park Master Plan; Edina, MN* • Main Street SE and Sixth Avenue SE Historic Restoration; Minneapolis, MN* PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. *Erperience prior to LHB r`f=S= Craig Churchward, ASLA Transportation Landscape Architect Registration Licensed Landscape Craig recently joined LHB and brings 30 years of professional experience related Architect in Minnesota, to fitting complex and controversial transportation projects into the natural Wisconsin, and Michigan environment and the social fabric of affected communities. Craig developed a Visual Impact Assessment (VIA) process which has been used by the FHWA Affiliations and several state and national agencies, including the National Park Service, to Transportation Research Board determine impacts to, mitigation for, and enhancement of visual resources. As a Committee on Landscape and national expert in visual quality and scenic resources, he assisted the FHWA in Environmental Design (AFB40) developing its scenic byway program. His work includes the environmental analysis and preliminary and final design of major urban and rural transportation projects; American Society of the development of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit systems; the design of urban Landscape Architects (ASLA) streetscapes, plazas, and gateways; and the sustainable development and marketing Member and Chair, Landscape of scenic, historical, cultural and recreational resources to enhance tourism on Architects in Transportation PPN scenic byways and historic roads. Education As a landscape architect specializing in transportation, Craig has also developed Bachelor of the architectural concepts for highway bridges, noise walls and retaining walls in Landscape Architecture, several historically, environmentally or community sensitive areas. He has designed University of Minnesota rest areas, maintenance facilities, roadside interpretive sites and corridor planting plans. He is well versed in the geometric design of roadways, sympathetically fitting Awards them into the landscape and communities. His ability to engage the public and ASLA (IN Chapter) regulatory agencies in the planning and design process is a hallmark of his approach• Award of Excellence, 2006, to large infrastructure projects. Accelerate I-465 Context Project Experience Sensitive Solutions Design • I-94, Michigan DOT, developed a Corridor CSS Manual; Detroit, MI* Guidelines. • Blue Water Bridge and Plaza, Michigan DOT, Port Huron, MI* • North Texas Tollway Authority (NTTA) Design Guidelines, Dallas -Fort Worth ASLA (MN Chapter) Metroplex, TX* Honor Award for Public Design, • Schuylkill Trail Pedestrian Bridge over CSX Tracks; Philadelphia, PA* 2002, I -35W Aesthetic Design • I-754475 Reconstruction, Ohio DOT; Toledo, OH* Guide • Holman Field Floodwall, Metropolitan Airports Commission; St. Paul, MN* • Aesthetic Design Guidelines, Triangle Expressway, North Carolina Turnpike ASLA (MN Chapter) Authority; Charlotte, NC* Merit Award for Public Planning, • Legacy Parkway and Preserve, UDOT, Salt Lake City, UT* 1997, Route 66, Operational • Accelerate I-465 West Leg Reconstruction, INDOT, Indianapolis, IN* Guidelines and Tourism • Crosstown Commons Supplemental Design Guide; Minneapolis, MN* Opportunities • Minnehaha Creek Bridge Reconstruction; Minneapolis; MN* • Mn/DOT I-494 Reconstruction; Western Suburbs of the Twin Cities, MN* ASLA (MN Chapter) • Mn/DOT Design -Build Program; Saint Paul, MN* Honor Award for Public • I-190/0'Hare International Gateway; Chicago, IL* Planning, 1994, Visual Impact • I -35W Access Study, Mitigation and Enhancement Report; Assessment Process Hennepin County, MN* • I -35W Master Plan; Minneapolis, MN* • Crosstown Commons Aesthetic Design Guidelines; Minneapolis and Richfield, MN* • TH 197 Reconstruction and Urban Design; Bemidji, MN* • • CSAH 21 Trout Brook Bridge and Curve Reconstruction; Afton, MN* PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. • -=- Jason P. Aune, ASLA Landscape Architect Registration Licensed Landscape Architect Licensed Jason has 15 years of experience in landscape design, planning, urban design, and site construction. He has worked with multiple private clients, municipalities, associations, and universities on projects that involve master planning, private Affiliations landscape design, ecological design, streetscapes, recreational trails, parks, and American Society of Landscape conservation housing developments. Architects (ASLA) Member Jason's strong ability to design at many different scales has been demonstrated Education through his work on large regional projects to very intricate site design details. Master of He has excellent graphic representation and design ability and uses it to provide Landscape Architecture, the client with a true vision of the project. University of Minnesota Project Experience Bachelor of Science, • Hennepin County Road 19 "Mid -Lake Boulevard" Trail Concept; Shorewood, Landscape Architecture, Tonka Bay, and Orono, MN South Dakota State University • Lowry Avenue West Corridor Design; Minneapolis, MN • Heritage Park Housing Development; Minneapolis, MN Recognition • Tower Avenue Revitalization Project; Superior, WI 2007 MASLA Honor Award St. - Bassett Creek Eco Industrial Master Plan; Minneapolis, MN Croix Valley Retreat • Seward Longfellow Midtown Greenway Planning; Minneapolis, MN • Victory Memorial Drive; Minneapolis, MN • 2004 MASLA Merit Award, • Norwood Young America Streetscape Standards; NYA, MN Lowry Avenue West Corridor • South St. Paul Parks Master Plan; South St. Paul, MN Design • North Urban Regional Trail; Dakota County, MN • Simon's Ravine; South St. Paul, MN 2002 MASLA Merit Award, • Dickenson County Nature Center; Spirit Lake, IA Red Rock Corridor • Eagle Ridge Resort and Golf Community; Coleraine, MN • 3 Bays on Vermilion; Tower, MN 2001 MASLA Honor Award; - Arlington/Jackson Industrial Redevelopment; St. Paul, MN Pierce Butler Parkway and • Nielsen Retreat; Marine -on St. Croix, MN Conceptual Master Plan • WCROC Water Resources Education Garden; Morris, MN • Renewable Energy Center; Morris, MN 2000 National Student • West Central Research Center Horticulture Garden Master Plan; Morris, MN* Merit Award, ASLA • Itasca County Shoreland Revegetation Project; Itasca County, MN* • Laurentian Vision Project; Northeastern, MN* 1996 First Place, • Mesabi Trail - East Range Development; MN* South Dakota State Landscape ' Mesabi Trailhead, Site Design Study; MN* Design Competition - Kaposia Bridge Concepts; South St. Paul, MN • 38th & Nicollet Streetscape and Facade Improvements; Minneapolis, MN* • Colonial Cleaners Facade Improvements; Minneapolis, MN* • Best Food Market Facade Improvements; Minneapolis, MN* • Tester Studio and Woodshop; St. Croix Falls, WI* • Private Residence; White Bear Lake, MN* • Lasar/Ginnsberg Residence; River Falls, WI* • Boosalis Residence; Edina, MN* • I� • South St. Paul Municipal Building; South St. Paul, MN* PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN. 'Experience prior toLHB • Ll o e Transportation Commission Bylaws Po� Section 1: Introduction The bylaws outlined below are approved procedures for the Edina Transportation Commission. Members should review and understand City Code sections 1500 and 1509 included in the appendix of these bylaws. In the event of a conflict between the City Code and the Edina Transportation Commission bylaws, the City Code will prevail. Some components of these bylaws are common across all City boards and commissions. The City Staff Liaison should be consulted prior to considering bylaw amendments. Proposed bylaw amendments should be announced one meeting prior to voting on the proposed change. Bylaw amendments require the approval of a majority of the voting Edina Transportation Commission members and approval by the City Council. In addition to the city code and these bylaws, the Edina Transportation Commission will be guided by those policies and procedural documents applicable to the Edina Transportation Commission or City advisory boards in general. Copies of these documents will be made available to members at the beginning of their service with the Edina Transportation Commission. #ction 2: Mission and Business Address Refer to city code sections 1500.01 and 1509 for the Edina Transportation Commission mission. The business office for the Edina Transportation Commission is located at: Edina Engineering Department, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota, 55439. Members of the public can also contact the Edina Transportation Commission at edinamail@EdinaMN.gov. Section 3: Membership Membership Composition Refer to city code sections 1500.03 and 1509.04. Terms of Membership Refer to city code section 1500.04. Contact Information Edina Transportation Commission members are required to provide a mailing address and phone number or email address to the City Clerk. This contact information is available to City staff and members of the public. Responsibilities Edina Transportation Commission members are expected to be present and adequately prepared for all meetings and to actively participate in meeting discussions. Members who are unable to complete assigned tasks should notify the �jairperson as soon as possible. 11Page o e Cn Transportation Commission Bylaws Attendance Refer to city code section 1500.09. If a member cannot attend a regular meeting, he or she should notify the staff liaison as soon as possible and ideally no later than two hours prior to the start of the meeting. Cancelled meetings will be counted as meetings held and attended for purpose of calculating attendance percentages. Resignation or Removal Refer to city code section 1500.04. The Edina Transportation Commission may ask the City Council to review a member's appointment based on the member's failure to perform the responsibilities outlined above. Section 4: Meetings Meeting Notice Refer to city code section 1500.07. All board and commission meetings are open to the public. To comply with legal requirements and ensure accessibility to the public, the City Clerk gives official notice of all Edina Transportation Commission meetings on the City's website and at City Hall. Regular Meetings Refer to city code section 1500.07. Regular meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission are held at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50`h Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424 or another officially noticed location on the third Thursday of the month. A regular meeting may be rescheduled by the Edina Transportation Commission at a prior meeting. Annual Meeting In April, the Edina Transportation Commission will hold an annual meeting to: Elect officers for the upcoming year, Review and update bylaws as necessary, and Affirm the regular meeting schedule for the upcoming year. Special Meetings Special meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission may be called by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission voting members. Members will be notified of the special meeting by written or email communication at least three calendar days in advance of the meeting. To comply with the open meeting law and to ensure accessibility to the public, the City Clerk posts official notice of all special meetings. A quorum is not required for special meetings; however, members cannot take action on a motion unless a quorum is present. Canceling Meetings Meetings of the Edina Transportation Commission can be cancelled by the Chairperson, City Council, City Manager or by the directive of a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission voting members. Meetings may be cancelled for insufficient business, lack of quorum, conflict with a holiday, inclement weather, or in the event of a community emergency. ............. .. .. . 2 1 P a g e .r • • Transportation Commission Bylaws Quorum A simple majority of the voting members (5) constitutes a quorum for any regular or special meeting. If a quorum is not achieved within 15 minutes of the start of the meeting, no votes on Edina Transportation Commission business may be taken. If during the course of a meeting a quorum is not maintained, no further votes on Edina Transportation Commission business may be taken. Meeting Agendas Meeting agendas will be prepared by the Chairperson in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. Members may request that items be added to the agenda; however, the addition of such items is subject to approval by a majority of the voting members. The meeting agenda and related materials will be sent electronically and/or mailed the Thursday prior to the scheduled regular meeting. Meeting Proceedings During regular meetings, business will be conducted in the order listed below. The order of business may be changed with the support of a majority of the voting members. • Call to order • Roll call • Approval of agenda • Approval of minutes from preceding meeting • Public hearings • Community comment • Reports and recommendations • Correspondence • Commission comments • Staff comments • Adjournment Meetings will be conducted according to the latest edition of Roberts Rules of Order. Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Chair will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda that is relevant to the Edina Transportation Commission. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The chair has the right to limit the number of speakers making similar statements and to limit comments related to matters previously discussed. The Edina Transportation Commission is not required to respond to the comments. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, disruptive behavior such as the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing is not allowed. Motions and Voting A simple majority of voting members present and voting will decide all motions before the Edina Transportation Commission. At the request of a member, a roll call vote will be taken when there is a divided vote on any item. A tie 40 te on any motion will result in a failure to pass. Student members are not eligible to vote. 31Page Transportation Commission Bylaws Meeting Minutes Refer to city code section 1500.08. City staff will prepare minutes for Edina Transportation Commission meetings. The minutes will include which members were present and absent, a summary of each item discussed and any motions proposed, and the votes on those motions. If a member of City staff is not present to record minutes, the Edina Transportation Commission will appoint a secretary to prepare the minutes. The secretary will prepare draft minutes within two weeks of the meeting date and forward the draft to the Chair and City Staff Liaison. Approved minutes will be posted on the City's website and forwarded to the City Clerk for distribution to the City Council by the City Staff Liaison. Section 5: Officers Refer to city code section 1500.06. The Edina Transportation Commission will hold elections for the officer positions of Chairperson and Vice Chairperson at.the annual meeting in April. The Chairperson may make and second motions and vote on all motions. The duties of the Chairperson include but are not limited to: • Prepare the agenda in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Invoke a reasonable time limit for speakers during public testimony. • Ensure that the bylaws are followed and actions are properly taken. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Extend meetings or schedule special meetings as necessary. • Cancel meetings, in consultation with the City Staff Liaison. • Facilitate the development of the annual work plan. • Develop annual calendar of anticipated agenda items for each month. • Consult with members regarding attendance issues. • Encourage active participation by Edina Transportation Commission members and the members of the public. The Vice Chairperson performs the duties of the Chairperson in their absence. If both the Chairperson and the Vice Chairperson are absent, an acting chairperson may be assigned in advance by either officer or at the meeting by a majority vote of the members. Section 6: City Staff Liaison Refer to city code section 1500.02. The Edina Transportation Commission has a City Staff Liaison appointed by the City Manager. The City Staff Liaison is expected to work cooperatively with Edina Transportation Commission members. Members may not direct City staff but can request assistance through the City Staff Liaison to carry out the Edina Transportation Commission mission. The duties of the City Staff Liaison include but are not limited to: • Work with Chairperson to prepare and distribute meeting agendas. • Reserve meeting rooms and other needed meeting equipment. • Record and prepare meeting minutes (or delegate the responsibility to another City staff member). • Provide technical expertise and access to City resources. • Work with Chairperson to ensure bylaws are followed and annual work plans are submitted. 4 1 P a g e • is w9%A� A a e Transportation Commission Bylaws • Relay information or directives from City Council meetings or work sessions relevant to the Edina Transportation Commission. • Respond to Edina Transportation Commission inquiries in a timely manner. • Forward information to and between Edina Transportation Commission members. • Record meeting attendance, include the current attendance record with each packet, and consult with the Chairperson and City Clerk regarding attendance issues. • Provide orientation materials to new members and chairperson. • Handle funds allocated to the Edina Transportation Commission in accordance with its directives, city policies and legal requirements. • Serve as the custodian of Edina Transportation Commission records. • Work with City Clerk to serve all notices required by law or these bylaws: Concerns with the performance of the City Staff Liaison should be directed to the Assistant City Manager. Section 7: Committees and Working Groups Introduction mmittees or Working Groups may be established by a majority vote of the Edina Transportation Commission to study issues in greater depth and report findings. Committees or Working Groups present their analysis to the Edina Transportation Commission for discussion and recommendations. The Edina Transportation Commission has the sole authority to make final recommendations on all matters on which a Committee or Working Group has given guidance. The Edina Transportation Commission defines the scope and the duration of the Committee or Working Group's mission. In no case may the Committee or Working Group exceed the authority granted by the Edina Transportation Commission. Committee and Working Group participants may not include enough voting Edina Transportation Commission members to constitute a quorum for the Edina Transportation Commission. Committees or Working Groups may be designated as standing (ongoing) or temporary in nature. Definitions Committees and Working Groups may be comprised of two or more people, one of which is the Chair appointed by the Edina Transportation Commission. A Committee is comprised of current Edina Transportation Commission members only. A Working Group is led by a Edina Transportation Commission member, but will also include members of the public. Working Group Announcement Public notice will be given of the formation of any Working Group, including a press release from the City to local media outlets. Individuals will have a minimum of 14 days after the public notice to express interest in joining before members are selected. Wsublic Access ed on the potential public interest in the topic, some Committees and Working Groups meetings may be designated as public meetings by the Edina Transportation Commission or the City Council. If a Committee or Working Group's 5 1 P a g e o e Transportation Commission Bylaws meetings are designated as public meetings, official meeting notices, written agendas and written minutes are required. Refer to Section 4 of these bylaws for additional information on meeting notices. Appointments and Chair Assignments Committees: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for Committee volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission membership. A majority vote may approve the Committee appointments once sufficient volunteers are established. The Committee will elect its own Chair and notify the Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson. Working Groups: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission to serve as the Working Group Chair. The Working Group Chair is approved by a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission members. The Working Group Chair will recommend other Working Group members. By definition, those members will include individuals outside of the Edina Transportation Commission. The Chair may also nominate a co-chair who is not a Edina Transportation Commission member. Working Group appointments will be made by a majority vote of Edina Transportation Commission members. The duties of the Committee or Working Group Chair(s) include but are not limited to: • Set the meeting schedule and, if required, notify the City Staff Liaison for public notification. • Prepare and distribute a written meeting agenda, if required. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. • Ensure that this section of the bylaws and Edina Transportation Commission directives are followed. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Recommend members and notify Edina Transportation Commission of changes in membership (Working Group only). • Report on the Committee or Working Groups activities at each regular Edina Transportation Commission meeting. • Communicate to the Committee or Working Group any directives, questions or input from the Edina Transportation Commission. Resignation or Removal A Committee or Working Group member may voluntarily resign by submitting his or her written resignation to the Chair of the Committee or Working Group. A Committee or Working Group member may be removed by a majority vote of the Edina Transportation Commission. Disbanding A Committee or Working Group may be disbanded at any regular meeting of the Edina Transportation Commission by a majority vote of the members. Committees or Working Groups will automatically be disbanded if no member of the Edina Transportation Commission is available to serve or appropriate volunteer membership cannot be established. ..... . .............. . 6 1 P a g e • • • Transportation Commission Bylaws Section 8: Communication Applicability This section applies to all types of media.and communication methods including face-to-face, telephone, email and social media. Communication Between Members Outside of Meetings Edina Transportation Commission related communication between members when a quorum of voting members is present constitutes a violation of Open Meeting laws if it takes place outside of publicly -noticed meetings. Members are prohibited from discussing Edina Transportation Commission business in such a situation. Since email communication is common outside of meetings, the following email protocol is adopted: • Any email communication intended for a majority of Edina Transportation Commission members should go through the City staff Liaison so that an appropriate record can be established. • Members should not respond "reply all" to group messages. • Members should not blind copy (bcc) other members. Members must not engage in a serial discussion of Edina Transportation Commission business. A serial discussion occurs 4pen members discuss official business with a majority of voting members through successive communications. Serial ommunication can occur through a combination of communication methods such as face to face, email, telephone or on a social media site. Communication with the Public Outside of Meetings Edina Transportation Commission members are encouraged to share their work with members of the public within the guidelines noted in the paragraph below. When communicating Edina Transportation Commission business with the public, members should understand and convey the following: • The deliberations and decisions of the Edina Transportation Commission will be based solely on information contained in the public record presented to all Edina Transportation Commission members participating in the deliberation or action. • The member's comments do not represent the opinion or viewpoint of other commissioners or the Edina Transportation Commission as a whole. Members should exercise care not to communicate how they intend to vote on any pending matter or give the appearance any matter has been pre -decided. Public Announcements and Press Releases The City's Communications and Marketing Department will approve and coordinate any public announcements, press releases or other media contact desired by the Edina Transportation Commission. • 7Page Transportation Commission Bylaws Section 9: Financial Transactions All financial expenditures by the Edina Transportation Commission must relate to the Edina Transportation Commission mission and be covered under the Edina Transportation Commission budget. All expenditures must be approved in advance by a majority of the voting members. The City Staff Liaison is responsible for ensuring that all approved expenditures or reimbursements meet the criteria above as well as other City financial policies. Expenditures that do not meet the criteria above will not be reimbursed. The Edina Transportation Commission does not have the authority to execute contracts or to otherwise financially obligate the City of Edina. Any contract related to Edina Transportation Commission business will be managed by the City Staff Liaison and may be subject to City Council approval. Section 10: Ethical and Respectful Conduct Conflict of Interest Members may not use their position on the Edina Transportation Commission for personal benefit. The interests of the Edina Transportation Commission must be the first priority in all decisions and actions. Any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any Edina Transportation Commission action or decision must disclose this fact as a conflict of interest. A member who has disclosed a conflict of interest should abstain from discussion and voting on the matter. • Gifts Edina Transportation Commission members may not receive personal gifts from any "interested person" in conjunction with their board and commission duties. An "interested person" is a person, or representative of a person or an association, who has a direct financial interest in a recommendation under the Edina Transportation Commission's purview. This section does not apply to lawful campaign contributions. The Edina Transportation Commission may recommend acceptance of general gifts or donations through the City's donation policy. Respectful Behavior The City of Edina is committed to providing a work environment free from violence for all elected and appointed officials, employees and visitors. The City does not tolerate any form of violence in the workplace including threats or intimidating actions by or against any of the groups cited above. Violence and threats may include, but are not limited to: • Any act which is a physical assault • Any threat, behavior or action which is interpreted by a reasonable person to carry the potential to harm or endanger the safety of others, or result in an act of aggression, or destroy or damage city property. The Chairperson and City Staff Liaison have the right to call for the immediate removal of anyone who threatens or commits an act of violence on City property. Respectful behavior also includes how Edina Transportation Commission members relate to each other, City staff and members of the public. Members share a joint responsibility in modeling, monitoring and addressing behavior within the • group. During Edina Transportation Commission interactions, members should strive to: . 81Page ° Tr ansportation Commission Bylaws • Treat people with courtesy, politeness and kindness • Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas • Listen to what others have to say • Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes • Recognize cultural differences Members should avoid: • Speaking over or cutting off another individual's comments • Insulting, disparaging or putting down people or their ideas • Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments. How to Report Members can report cases of unethical conduct to the City Staff Liaison, Assistant City Manager, City Manager or City Attorney. Appendix City Code section 1500 City Code section 1509 0 • ............... ... . 9 1 P a g e • C Transportation Options Working Group Purpose: • To review current transportation options for Edina seniors aging in place, including volunteer driver services, public transportation, private commercial transportation, and non -motorized transportation, and identify the need for additional services as appropriate • Review and make recommendations for additional services and infrastructure improvements to meet the transportation needs of Edina seniors aging in place • To recommend partnerships and outside sources of funding to helpmeet the transportation needs of Edina seniors aging in place • To identify other populations who may also be served by these measures From ETC Bylaws Section 7: Committees and Working Groups Appointments and Chair Assignments Committees: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for Committee volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission membership. A majority vote may approve the Committee appointments once sufficient volunteers are established. The Committee will elect its own Chair and notify the Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson. Working Groups: The Edina Transportation Commission Chairperson will ask for volunteers from the Edina Transportation Commission to serve as the Working Group Chair. The Working Group Chair is approved by a majority of the Edina Transportation Commission members. The Working Group Chair will recommend other Working Group members. By definition, those members will include individuals outside of the Edina Transportation Commission. The Chair may also nominate a co-chair who is not a Edina Transportation Commission member. Working Group appointments will be made by a majority vote of Edina Transportation Commission members. The duties of the Committee or Working Group Chair(s) include but are not limited to: • Set the meeting schedule and, if required, notify the City Staff Liaison for public notification. • Prepare and distribute a written meeting agenda, if required. • Lead the meeting in accordance with the agenda and facilitate discussion on agenda items. 0 • Ensure that this section of the bylaws and Edina Transportation Commission directives are followed. • Maintain meeting decorum. • Recommend members and notify Edina Transportation Commission of changes in membership (Working Group only). • Report on the Committee or Working.Groups activities at each regular Edina Transportation Commission meeting. • Communicate to the Committee or Working Group any directives, questions or input from the Edina Transportation Commission. • 0 Y z Z W O K K > m H O Z dOlS � a �Illl/nll / Z � � E- x z m ® Cornelia Dr s d w E, 'O m STOP \�� A N woww A Gs7 O Z d 7 z O PAVEMENT MARKING KEY 0 CIRCLE - EPDXY �--� ATRIANGLE -PAINT © c*1 EXISTINGMATCHL INE A 1ST DIGIT 2NDDIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM O WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACKa im PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT LANE MARKING)-��+�,,,� B(] PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE-POLY (SHARED o I PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW) PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)- SCALE IN FEET1 O Z ry N w ,O ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS z x li npd V NESOr ?�14. a Z(� W�� _ Cornelia Dr kJ w 00 c 0z 00 o TZ _ ¢ aJo Fp»Nww z n N - -� _ oo:� w w �¢gamaowzo c. LLUU o te fi + O Op M3:: 3�mrNZ,¢ w a a � � -=JZZWZS ao¢¢wF- z + DRAWN: KAS 7 o O CHECKED: KAB 0 Ln APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 IMP. jJ X3-XXX MATCHL INE A CONTR.1 ENG 00-X SHEET 1 OF 21 m:x STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 Y �\/ C O� Q N � 2 w sO L �V }} W O O Z X \ S d W ---- --'� _ / I E— p Corne I [a Dr--- r w w a, �j wz x o0.� �b d z W Z d A � oa G' z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE -EPDXY ATRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING IST DIGIT2N�DIGIT31RD WIDTH PATTERN DIGIT COLOR O SQUARE - POLY PREFORM 4', 8', ETC. S- SOLID W - WHITE n (GROUNDIN) OXY (BIKE BLVD)- B - BROKEN D DOTTEDIDOUBLE Y.YELLOW B BLACK SYMBOL WITH n - - >� f� PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANESSAGE MARKING) -NT r PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- 80 PAVEMmNNN MARKING (SPEEDEP-AVEMENT HUMPMARKING SPECIAL i)- Z N N EXISTING PAVEMENT 'SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS SCALE IN FEET = o a " LIN \ n i c 0 00 C o r n e I i a Dr 5 3 co ci 10 �wrno = 20 t m J �b ma�awwQ o c rrw�inz0 o ' wzao�c�[�w z N DRAWN: KAS o CHECKED: KAB 0 APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 ,o ; IMP.# X3 -XXX �.o CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 2 OF 21 mQx STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 MATCHLINE B ) ( ' Y N Z O � N } 4Wm a 0 ' z z dols �- iGn Cr] Z h 4 E— x SouthdaIe Rd —�� 7 z co S STOP z � x A � � PAVEMENT MARKING KEY I _ CIRCLE - EPDXY C/] IA TRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING �/ 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM /'� WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUND IN) Q 4', 8", ETC. S -SOLID W -WHITE ` PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPDXY B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW '_ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' MATCHL INE BD-DOTTEDIDOUBLE B -BLACK oM PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT 80 PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING)' [� a PREFORM >♦ Al (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- m tO /! PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY SCALE IN FEET ozm l ' C (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)• Z ' m x EXISTING PAVEMENT • SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS o z •• rrte`` noa� V NES\q 5 Z / ) -- --- o Z 0I q _.----- -- Go 1 —7 �----- SouthdaIe Rd —__-____ -- << m a J o o o V 0 K )` l 'G ��¢Qao�cN ZO m «¢ w w Q O C X3 NZ� � U .<00 J Z 2 W Z 2 O -d 7¢KWt- O DRAWN: KAS g I CHECKED: KAB o ' APPROVED: MRA DMP 04/10/12 XXCONTR. ENG 00-X InI STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 3 OF 21 V Y Y, ti M NO (o m w U z � z U /' ♦ Jen. �' .,\ C43 z Z d v pq �� W W Southda I e Rd Cr] O z d x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY EXISTINGQ TRIANGLE -PAINT \ 1 ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR 4`, B', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE a SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUND IN) B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW D -DOTTED/DOUBLE B -BLACK ids PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)` o _ PROPOSED SOLID U WHITE -POLY EXAMPLE: 45W = PREO IR >� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (SHARED LANE MARKING)' 80mommi I ^ n PREFORM ► y PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)` .\ �� m N N N ?J \ PAVEMENT MARKING-EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL t)` SCALE IN FEET (� / `SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS / 'y J E E� a o LL Y_ p i i' NES�T9 U LLJ � b g i00 [ p �J • �` O z 0 CN 00 :m C14 v Al N=Z J m Southda I Rd I. _ Zo wao05 ram<�¢'w' o o. e //// waoow =�zwz zx DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA / //� % <N0 DATE: 04/10 12 mR= IMP. X3 -XXX ..moo Y1 O N CONTR. ENG 00-X mQx STATE PROJ. 120-091-002 SHEET 4 of 21 Y Q N g Z w � K N W 2' ti� o Z w e R Southda1d -- ro / w a - z rn 0- w � W = / % ca azo P4 as PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE -EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT © i� EXISTING is DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT WIDTH PATTERN COLOR SQUARE -POLY PREFORM El (GROUNDIN) 4", 8", ETC. S- SOLID W- WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW D B `,i�i'a PA MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKVE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' Q PROPOSED -DOTTED/DOUBLE -BLACK EXAMPLE: 4SW = PREOFORM INE WHITE -POLY � PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT MARK!NE NPA)INT n pAVEMENT(SHAREDAMESSAGE (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW) - 80 m N CPAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)• o °p 0 Z N N • SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MAIRKI NGS PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET W gLL9 n go a m rn � ^wa4 V - Southda I e RdINS CON J U / o0z 10 �wN co co / N mmS ;Q v SEL 0m:z Wg R,W aa0W J N N •" L - / / / / wa0_ zo }ar�wo� m��=WWF o r O W6000Uw =�ZZMZ a _�azwF / DRAWN: KASo 9 / CHECKED: KAB o / APPROVED: MRA <�� / DATE: 04/10 12 os, IMP.# X3 -XXX Qom$ CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 5 of 21 �QSTATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 N Lo U z z ^` N 0 ^ I I lL r � J` 'm T w a I o I c Z 0 z 11 z J ~ � E— 1 a d x w => o-w�w 1 d E- p a I w z I I Y o °07 z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O ,--t I 1 CIRCLE -EPDXY �DIGIT31RD TRIANGLE -PAINT EXISTING MATCHL INE E 1ST DIGIT 2 DIGIT O SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4', 8', ETC. S- SOLID B -BROKEN W - WHITE Y - YELLOWS PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' p n D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK iA PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT LANE MARKING)' 80 [ti� '�1 n N rn PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED n Mo PREFORM i + NT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROVEMENT MESSAGE - W)* SCALE IN FEET + N N -I— U PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY ISHUMP • PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)- w ,� + I 'SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS m z Q <pD e° rW I X ?( { a - Q_ z LI_ a a W =¢m I _ O ---- ( [��y tl 0z W Nw0 O res 3CN Q co 00 � E ' i-mWYZJO 0 rpW lnp Oww Z H Z Q O W LL a J m W \ wap zo re NC (n Z O ' o p( n59th St ( I wDzw _�ZZ WZ2 _apa�wr- zaQ�nsocn st DRAWN: KAS USE BNIDGE 0 CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04 10 12 `�7 \ IMP.# X3 -XXX All MATCHL INE E CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 6 OF 21 mQx STATE PROJ. 120-091-002 pf w O C. (75,7Z5 O %, Z LL. r w I w IZ-1nox ... F H J _ Wooddo l e Ave ® _--- ----- -- d x z d PQ => = )lost 1. '" U Q :zR I d E- W ,7/ O p z C>w PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O CIRCLE - EPDXY ATRIANGLE - PAINT 2ND DIGIT // / �� i EXISTING IST DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4',8",ETC. S -SOLID W -WHITEMATCHLINE G B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `,� PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' D -DOTTED/DOUBLE 8 -BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT "g (SHARED LANE MARKING)' EXAMPLE: 4SW = PRESOLID INE WHITE-POLY 80 PROPOSED FORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT i . (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- �•� n O v 1 0 PAVEMENTMARKING OEUM- PAMENTMARKING SPECIAL 1)- + SCALE IN FEET mNbN "VV EXISTING PAVEMENT • SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX MARKINGS fi 2 N N w rn 1 C =�� 33 Ld 0 NZ _= _ — — — w U - - - - - - - - - - Z a WooddaIe Ave - - - - - - - - - - J o — a -� •r t+t�p/�oZ s F C` r a �wN 00 N a°�a�o�N o 54 N Z LQ�a�w LL w w u w wm xw �inz� wzwmmzzwzm O W / DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 ¢oti / i !1 IMP.X3-XXX MATCHLINE G CONTRJ ENG 00-X SHEET 7 OF 21 So" STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 Y N W 0S� �' GJ K V) N � + W N L o + 4- O z l0 Cfl H z cn - - - - - - *oodda-I-e Ave -. - - - - - - - - - dz -- -- - -- U — ---- U w w �o Q ` Q 1 ­4 E- w a A c Y O w z x z � G' z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY Z CIRCLE -EPDXY in EXISTING IST DIGIT2N�DIGIT 3RD DIGIT A TRIANGLE - PAINT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUNDIN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)- ti o D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK iN PAVEMENT MESSAGE PAINT BO o WMn rn PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE-POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING) I n n moo PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)' o v s CPAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY HUMP PAVEMENT MARKING 1)- SCALE IN FEET (SPEED - SPECIAL m rn ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS .. z c 4 aoa � nw I- r� N S a - t0 H'ji ^ w z.- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Z _ i--I J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I e Ave_ -' INS _ - - - - - - - - - - - --Woodda - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - P U U ►- F- Q c as 00 o ZO 10 CN O ME N W O W 0 f'mW}ZJO �WVI CIN�Z O O U }aH¢LL Z p 4.aV p¢g N a a V + W d Z o }QE¢KKr � RZW VI O - O J Z ZZI = W W= �� DRAWN: KAS W CHECKED: KAB 5 APPROVED: MRA o DATE: 04/10/12 IMP.( X3-XXX NN G CONTRJ ENG 00-X �Qx STATE PROJ. : 120-091-002 SHEET e OF 21 Y Q z � O V) Ln .0 r m 0 Q LLQ p LL7 Z z H � L LJ Lli Z ...r C>r Z — _--- _ — — — - Woodda I e Ave — ; w z E- — — — -- — — U Q W F— a =5 A w w a o w z x z dx ca � as PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O z CIRCLE -EPDXY ATRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING 1ST DIGIT 2ND�T31RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM O WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B -BROKEN Y - YELLOWS PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' p D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT 80 n ^ N PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING)' PREFORM >♦ PAVEMENT MESSAGE - (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW) PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY SCALE IN FEET p a0 O I ml (SPEED HUMP -PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)' EXISTING PAVEMENT .. ` SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS Z z c a4 •{-• by n w i- N V) L cn Lo Ln I I LTJ g^5 Ldz `- �- Zti - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J Woodda I e -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Ave- - - - - - - - - - -� INQ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - U KlW LAE H c -• Sa o z w 0 O ao N V NmwN W N n�mwrz�o o xp»U ww �-wNpinxz lows [J aw w wx zo woo zo N m r m wi¢_lI'wI 0 zw v o g a = JppUciw zzww= .. DRAWN: KAS o CHECKED: KAB 0 APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 IMP.# X3 -XXX M. CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 9 OF 21 mex STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 Y az z w4 N Q L � — 3 a 0 � O Z O O ~ z W Z o. Z — — — Woodda I e Ave c� -- — — — — — — — — — -- ........- _= w z cn -- �, 4 o E- /� A w w a c .�adza. o � % �o w z x O o , C! Q z w o � as a °oz PAVEMENT MARKING KEY Z' CIRCLE - EPDXY A F� 1ST TRIANGLE - PAINT �+ EXISTING DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUNDIN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOWS PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' ti p n D - DOTTEDlDOUBLE B -BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT 80 n PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 45W = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE-POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING)' ? n Mo oM PREFORM i + MENT MESSAGE -PN IKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)T' PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY SCALE IN FEETaO �I z (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)- �`+ ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS O z " v F,m 3 , O O O ~ � Y W o _ J- - dW: W . a - - - - - - - - - Woodda 1 e Ave _ _ _ - - - - _ - -- - _ J - - /oz w CN CN E c \`\v z n Y LLaUap¢E 1 KK�Qd01� N O 0 wao zo C L m ; w N trzO. ~ V z wp a p — X zzwz U O DRAWN: KA$ o CHECKED: KAB 0 APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 aN% SON IMP. X3-XXX CONTRJ ENG 00-X SHEET 10 ov 21 m:x STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 Y Z � O K N Ln L 0 c O 3 a o c �� z ._ M x O F � W ... — — — — Woodda i e Ave o — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — J Cw z _ ------ — -- ._.._..- ---- --- ---- ----- -- -- d x a = 1 0.�za m Q +_+ V) 'n woxw Ln ba Q0 d Z w Lo z x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY 0 CIRCLE - EPDXY in EXISTING 1ST DIGIT2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT TRIANGLE - PAINT SQUARE -POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUND IN) 4-, 8•, ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW i= PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B -BLACKPAVEMENT - 80 PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW - 4- SOLID INE WHITE -POLY >� (SHARED LANESSAGE MARKING) -NT PREFORM } y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT - (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW) PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY SCALE IN FEET (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)• 1 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS C a 4 O 3 z\N� 0 + a �•+U Alm C L Q ^' x y 'Y Y 0 0 0€ 0 Lj s a W ~- = - - Woodda-I e Ave - �--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ - - - - - - - �-- - - - -' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ''- = = = i-. O z00 V) Nw- N N Q L mw}ZJO ¢ ano z r=-wwooN=Z o N N Ln }¢H Qlwi~Z L-muLn M K¢�¢aOLL wao_ zo N LD w3��rwN 5 Lr)wzw a `nz o =Jzzwzm z _a�¢¢w� N DRAWN: KA$ 0 CHECKED: KAB 8 APPROVED: MRA aN� DATE: 04/10/12 oN_ IMP.( X3 -XXX �o CONTR. ENG 00-X �QxSTATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 11 DF 21 Y az z w g [e w � U o — � z O L. 0 L- °' z J W - r ----- ------- - — — --- Wouddo I e -ave — — — — — — _ — — "" E -I J — - -- — — -- -- - - = z d E-O V) iN STOP > --a a m Q �_c M `-) ��wz � A G' z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY 0 '7-r CIRCLE -EPDXY EXISTING 7S7 DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT ATRIANGLE - PAINT SQUARE -POLY PREFORM .¢a MA TCHL I NE M WIDTH PATTERN COLOR a (GROUND IN) 4-. 8'. ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW `_' PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' D -DOTTED/DOUBLE B -BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (SHARED LANE MARKING) 80 q °d R, N I n PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY n Oi PREFORMPAVEMENT f MESSAGE -PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)' o'er 1 r o /! PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY (SPEED HUMP -PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)' SCALE IN FEET o W I I Z N N ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS ^ p d li rhe V U Z 0 L• ILS 4 JLIJ a a / W :sdm z - - - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — z= I --I _ - -- Ie Av_e _j - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -W- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - .- - - - - - - _ INS c Q Qb ' N a rt O 00 N a 0 t �, Q 8 C TT?P - _ L IY7 = o» 005 CN z / V Q - ��KQaOLL N m SNI039 Ln `w!� wao- zo ��'� o ;° NV 3XI9 � >aE¢w¢ m;w,�z • G C��4 BIKE LANE " o n z =JZ Zw o a z Z= ¢wwl- Lek, Cornelle Park r���+ DRAWN: IknJ a n Toth St CHECKED: KAB c n soon se b APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 aNN cw� MATCHL INE M IMP. # X3 -XXX CONTR. # ENG 00-X SHEET 12 OF 21 m:x STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 Y V1 W U Q O 2 z a z O z - --- — z as h J - - - - Woodda I e -Ave - - - - -. - - - - -- - - - - U a r a z o M 1 N > w a CD m A C Cm3 O w LC•) � a' (7 Z -:R:: p d W o z 0 PAVEMENT MARKING KEY �^ --- CIRCLE -EPDXY �. �DIGIT31RD EXISTING 1ST DIGIT DIGIT ATRIANGLE - PAINT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) 4'• B", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B -BROKEN Y -YELLOW`S PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)• o ^ D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK » PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (SHARED LANE MARKING)- 80 n PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW ' SOLIDINE WHITE-POLY o 0 PREFORM i y PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT^� (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)" =o v r_ m � t C A PAVEMENT MARKING SCALE IN FEET m Q o I I N (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)" Z N m rn ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGSa E-,o a •• " �n?4 � nw ?NE�19. 63� P Z O LI-1 ^asea -- Z------ - - - - - - _ _ — f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J- Woodda I e Ave J - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -� - - _ - U U o O CQ C i + / C OOZ O � N w N 04 n N N ��s J3Q v 8ci Qmd JOJO z f I-�W NOWFZ (i O N ` N � �<U-¢Z aw o 7 In w m �ao_ozo m 5 wwa wEr z 0 - a i =m Da�w. .• DRAWN: KAS o CHECKED: KAB o APPROVED: MRA 0 N QN2 DATE: 04 10/12 NON IMP. X3-XXX NU! CONTRJ ENG 00-X SHEET 13 DF 21 maxSTATE PROJ. 120-091-002 V � N Y Q N � Z O 'r K NN C-^? 4 t ' 1151 m p z 0 rntuunnr z E- Woodda I e A7ve a" w U rtntlutnru ' � C --�- 1 d E- p Q J l A W w W A Q O � � � W C> O 0 z dx � as PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE -EPDXY \` z ___ i/n IST DIGIT""'�DIGIT3RD A TRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING DIGIT SQUARE -POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4-, 8', ETC. S - SOLID W- WHITE B -BROKEN Y - YELLOW S PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)- �+ p M D -DOTTED/DOUBLE B -BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT BD PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE-POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING)' , ;` r ` j M o 0 ^rV PREFORM i EMENT MESSAGE -PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)' In \ i m n yo `o /PA PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXY l , ; '` SCALE IN FEET Q~ 0 w�j N (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)- Jr- ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS m rn z •• '" Tti y\\\ =spy y V3o0 Alm , 0 W z- - - - - - - - - ...— — - - - - - - - - - - —..........._...-.. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - / Itltl/tIr _—_- - - - - - - - _ -- YS o- -- Woodda I e Ave - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C -�- o _jwo J oz 00 oNp � wNCN rg5 n — Z<, z Jp z SD»vp-iww hwNOy=Z O T�1 V I I �Q�-alwi~Z D U Q - K�Kadpw N q Uap'p70 W m � m3 =wwF y fi KZy�j�NZN app �Uw =JZZWZS �azwt- o z DRAWN: KAS o CHECKED: KAB 0 APPROVED: MRA 0 ( DATE: 04/10/12 oaory IMP.# X3-XXX CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 14 OF 21 mQx STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 7 // Y G O N d S� i O / \ N p 7 o app \ w .r — - _ zw z Cn VALLEY VIEW RD_ r- - - _ �- - - -� - - �_ J Q z z u paw Y,� Q I 4 E— �O % %a O Ix W CD PAVEMENT MARKING KEY `s' z O CIRCLE - EPDXY .�. C.7 TRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING 1ST DIGIT2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT O SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) 4•, 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE• B -BROKEN Y - YELLOWa PAVEMENT LWT BIKE SYMBOL BLVD)- n D- DOTTED/DOUBLE B- BLACK ti o M PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT A PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4• SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING). r ` R M PREFORM PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT ^V O O o (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- m W e (SPEED PAVEMENT HUMP - PAIVEMENTOMARKING SPECIAL 1)- BO Z N EXISTING PAVEMENT SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS a r x / SCALE IN FEET aoa4 d CD \ O\ / ti �� CD �- Ell J o p� C - � w z v \ m �'\ �\ w z oz o N S _cc VAQ.EY VLEW RD - - - - - -� �r� <�< ��S JN N J � y ¢ djOwtn z U �owvoim�=Z v Yl. - —(-- rQ�-a4'-z C;OWE � wma zo 0 m =Jzzwz _a0a¢wF DRAWN: KAS� CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 V �IMP.# X3—XXX CONTR. ENG DO—X STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 15 DF 21 N Y �N � Z W� � N !r \\\\ Jffff m Z -T-7 1 o d E'er mown `T� ;Rn z x G' PAVEMENT MARKING KEY z CIRCLE - EPDXY Cn QTRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING IST DIGIT""�DIGIT3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM �. WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUND IN) © O 4', B', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE s PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY B -BROKEN Y -YELLOW (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD D - DOTTEDIDOUBLE B - BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT o M n PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW a 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING) N r ` j M o 0 PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT BO (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- O v I rr,m e N PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1) -EXISTING O 0 °D a0 • SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET w g rn C OQ ao w � 1� W $Valley VJ e w \ W .m- V O ZO O 00 n Qr V \ N y — 00 N ¢md �O JyOj z o � � \.\ 1o»Nww WV1o0a a 4a1ao¢f �J a mat wao_ ao U O� c O ¢Zw�u�iiN waoo(3UW =JZa v C z WZ _a0a¢­ DRAWN: KAS 0 CHECKED: KAB o APPROVED: MRA a DATE: 04/10/121 N IMP.# X3 -XXX \O D O N CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 16 OF 21 �Q= STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 I f i; N Y Q Z 1( I. . . . . . . . . . I 1 � z� , 1111 1 s m o Valley View Rd ;E— u U Q H- f-A, ...3, d C4 PAVEMENT PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE -EPDXY QTRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING IST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUND IN) 4', 8', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE Qi OXY B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW S ( (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD) - D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK >� PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT 80 r ` � n � N PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW PREOFOR- SLIDM INE WHITE -POLY PAVEMENT MESSAG(SHARED LANE RE PAINT oM Mo i (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)' SCALE IN FEET r-1�m�NN PAVEMENT MARKING -EPDXYco (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)• N u� EXISTING PAVEMENT s rn m 'SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS �b x voa�= ( n w Q0 i Z' %1111 n w C7Lu I Li — Z Valley View Rd 00 0 ZO 10 CN U oNo V) + j� �ZW�NZ0 a v /� =aZZWZ= i / DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB / APPROVED: DATE: 04 10/12 f IMP. X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00-X STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 17 01 211 Y 4 N � Z w � LL1 5 Ld > Q a LL1 > > Q Q l\ } m Z Ld w U c� a I--1 > o O J z J Y O W p � BOTS Y BOTS BOTS mi z Ld z z -. z vn _ — — — — — — — — — — - W-5 4TH S -T -- -- — — f -I J cm d rr E-,� M -- u-94 UU STOP `� s d < = 1 d = pq� Z O STOP STOP S��Q adz04 9 ca A W z S z �x c � m PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE - EPDXY ___ ATRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING 1ST DIGIT WIDTH 2N�DIGIT31RD DIGIT PATTERN COLOR SQUARE - POLY PREFORM (GROUNDIN) 4". 8% ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW PAVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD PROPOSED D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK EXAMPLE: 4SW - OLIDINE WHITE -POLY >� PAVEMENT - SHARED LANESSAGE MARKING) -NT M o 0 PREFORM f PAVEMENT MESSAGE -PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)• m�NN PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)• \ $Q m mi O Z N N •SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX EXISTING PAVEMENT i �MARKINGS \ o a •• x E. SCALE IN FEET LLJ LLI > \ � �aNE�\S a a z LL) 0 0 a > _ O O J J LLI Y Q O 0 z ( � � d O � `° - odm? - -- Z W H J W 54TH ST '-' o z w 00 00N 1. )p �TuP S ��� ��. �wNo � � �aUap¢� y w Qww waoaZo -�Dw3 a�a��Q o �O w z w NZ w o n aooc7 caw =�zzwwF DRAWN: KAS o CHECKED: KAB o APPROVED: MRA 2 N DATE: 04/10/12 X3 -XXX NN - \O CONTR. ENG 00-X SHEET 18 DF 21 �QxSTATE PROJ. : 120-091-002 Y Q N � Z w � OC In Ld m x 0 Z aLL II �TS �� = Ln a. w / w -- c -D z E- - W -54TH - ST - - - - - - - - - - - w U VLLJ s a W w _ g Oj —I > Q STOP A Q Y o w z LL (DREMOVE TYP C SIGN = Z d x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE - EPDXY \ �DIGIT3RD Q TRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING 1ST DIGIT DIGIT O SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR (GROUNDIN) �+ 4% 8', ETC. S - SOLID W- WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW as PAVEMENT MESSAGE -EPDXY (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' o n PROPOSED D -DOTTED/DOUBLE B -BLACK EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4- SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY >�z PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (SHARED LANE MARKING)' PREFORM 1r , PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- C PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP P.PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL l)- 80 Q 00 I z N N ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS � � o = •• " In_a o SCALE IN FEET 1� a x CGoy9ti9 LL Q N rs�2 \./ 1Ld--- - LLJ Z W 54TH ST -' U V G \ /��� ' 0 00 CN 5ONO `w Q L In IJ N ( r 1 =o=NwN $ m Q LL �aa�aLLo o_� FwwE¢w N u waoaaZO w m c \ = w¢oou3w a =JZ Zw ZS ¢wr- Q \ DRAWN: KAS g ~ \\ CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA o DATE: 04/10/12 6 N-� MIO N IMP. # X3 -XXX CONTR. ENG 00-X 19 OF 21 mx STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 11HEE1 N Y Q N � Z w 0 d' N W Wui Ld Q W zR. O N Q 11 W dots W o 0 0 Z w Ld W 54TH STJ r F, - 2-1 C/� I d E-+ p 01 REMOVE TYP C SIGN z x m A "" Y W z PAVEMENT MARKING KEY CIRCLE -EPDXY �^ C/1 ATRIANGLE - PAINT EXISTING 1ST DIGIT 2ND DIGIT 3RD DIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR O (GROUNDIN) 4", 8", ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE B - BROKEN Y - YELLOW"_ (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVDVEMENT MESSAGE - EPDXY ti n D - DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK >tm PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4S-W = 4" SOLID LINE WHITE-POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING)' PREFORM y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- m N N GPAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY (SPEED HUMP - PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL l)- 80 ' SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX-XX EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS m N z t x a > W SCALE IN FEET V n W Q Q W =�m a W< 10.1 z Y w m m IZ� Q W d 0 1 S_g ED W � fn = _ - - - W 54TH ST z J Q Q C ' V(J(/• NWO O � C14 � C/1 a y (�, .=-�5 iia o m b' �mwrz�o o- 0 w NFZ U ao N -�aaV wm w ow wao_ z04o w L mag Q�yZj tQ- � 5 N O KZW~VI ZW U =ZS a _Izzw _a �a¢w�- z N DRAWN: KAS 0 CHECKED: KAB o APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 N� -ON IMP. X3-XXX \O NNN CONTR. ENG 00-X m:xTE STAPROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 20 of 21 Y z W � � S d' Ld EJ.I EIJ Q Q J Q 41�D aLd - dols _r m w � m FZ w dO1S m N z H _ W 54TH ST w z 1- a x z / aw cn w � � o STOP zw z Y O W z 10 REMOVE TYP C SIGN Z Gs7 x PAVEMENT MARKING KEY O X Z+ CIRCLE - EPDXY 'z Z� ATRIANGLE -PAINT EXISTING IST DIGIT2�DIGIT3RDDIGIT SQUARE - POLY PREFORM WIDTH PATTERN COLOR a (GROUND IN) B - BROKEN Y YELLOW 4', B', ETC. S - SOLID W - WHITE PAVEMENT MESSAGE EPDXY - �`e (BIKE SYMBOL WITH BLVD)' D -DOTTED/DOUBLE B - BLACK PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT ~ o N PROPOSED EXAMPLE: 4SW = 4' SOLID LINE WHITE -POLY (SHARED LANE MARKING) W M M M PREFORM i y PAVEMENT MESSAGE - PAINT 50 0 (BIKE SYMBOL WITH ARROW)- o v I I mu��oN PAVEMENT MARKING - EPDXY O °D (SPEED HUMP P. PAVEMENT MARKING SPECIAL 1)'so Z N N w s n n EXISTING PAVEMENT f rn rn SEE PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEETS XX -XX MARKINGS o a .E.. ti ^waw SCALE IN FEET V ?NES\9.pg LLJ Ld Q Q J Q an a Z 0 _ Ld F—F-- Q - �y (] (/ co co Ld Ld c Z .odol `• 8 U ; Z .' ,s Q W 54TH ST - a tiNm0w OZ o�oro gN;Fl- 'wzQv � l 1 o�noN�z C�! ci wao zo w - mi 2wwF � ¢r -viz inv 1,0050. O =JZH _aoQ¢wrZ DRAWN: KAS CHECKED: KAB APPROVED: MRA DATE: 04/10/12 IMP.# X3 -XXX CONTRJ ENG 00-X STATE PROJ.#: 120-091-002 SHEET 21 of 21 L 0 Edina Transportation Commission Roll -Call Sign -in Sheet April 19, 2012 Last Name First Name Signature ass.Y< Katherine Braden Ann Franzen Nathan Traveling for work Iyer Surya Janovy Jennifer LaForce * Tom 'Nelson * Paul Schwei er* Steven Thompson Michael hited ')` ICourtney