Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017 11-13 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
IS Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota Council Chambers Wednesday, November 15, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call Ill. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission October 25, 2017 V. Public Hearings A. Subdivision With Variances - 6017 Walnut Drive VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments XI. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota Council Chambers Wednesday, November 15, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call Ill. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission October 25, 2017 V. Public Hearings A. Subdivision With Variances - 6017 Walnut Drive VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments Xl. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Draft Minutes® . Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. ,ii,S a ,iMinutes 4,f „� \6 City Of Edina, Minnesota '" �. '41i Planning Commission i� :a /;/ Edina City Hall Council Chambers O'` , '/ October 25, 2017 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Olsen. Student Members,Jones and Mittal Staff, City Planner, Teague, Assistant Planner, Bodeker, Sr. Communications Coord., Eidsness, Facilities Manager, Tim Barnes, Support Staff, Hoogenakker. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the October 25, 2017, meeting agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the minutes of the October I I, 2017, meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Ordinance Amendment—Allowing Small Wireless Facilities and Wireless Support Structures in the Public right-of-way Appearing for the City Tim Barnes, City of Edina Facility Manager and City Attorney,James Monge, Campbell Knutson Staff Presentation Tim Barnes addressed the Commission and explained that the Chapter 24 of the ordinance was drafted at a time when antennas were bulky and bolted to the tops of guyed or lattice towers. In 2015, the Federal Communications Commission enhanced their rules regarding the transmission of 911 calls and the push Page I.of 8 Draft Minutes Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date, began for more reliable accurate location information. Barnes explained that the City worked with legal staff to revise the Ordinance to reflect the bill that allows small cell technology as an acceptable use in all Minnesota right of ways. Cities were given until January I, 2018 to create enabling ordinances to comply with the new State Law. Continuing, Barnes explained that the changes to Chapter 24 also required that Edina City Code Section 36-10 also be amended by adding definitions. Concluding, Barnes stated City Staff recommends that the changes to the ordinances be adopted. Commissioner Nemerov asked the Commission to note that he spoke to the City's attorney and suggested minor changes to the ordinance language. Discussion/Comments • Mr. Monge was asked about the permit fee range. Monge reported that State Statute establishes the fees. • Commissioners raised the question of the size of the wireless facilities. Monge said that State Statute establishes size. Monge said a City could request a change to the dimension requirements; however, most cities uphold the State Statute. • It was observed that this is a State law, questioning if one can ignore State Statute. Monge said cities have the right to regulate their right-of-way within the established State Statutes. He noted that some cities have no right-of-way requirements. The adoption of these amendments bring the Code current and in compliance with State Statutes and establish the means for a City to know where these wireless facilities are located. Public Hearing Chair Olsen asked if anyone would like to speak to the issue. There was no public testimony. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved to recommend approval of Ordinance No. 2017-12 based on staff findings and subject to the recommended conditions and changes per Commissioner Nemerov. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Page 2 of 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. B. Site Plan Review with Parking Variance— Simon Properties Staff Presentation Planner Teague delivered a power point presentation and recommended the following: That the City Council approve the site plan with parking stall variance of I,138 stalls for the entire Southdale site based on the following findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the exception of the parking space variance. 2. The findings for a variance are met. 3. The Southdale site is unique in the PCD-3 zoning district. It is the only regional shopping mall in Edina. There are no other 80 acre sites held in common ownership and zoned the same within the City. 4. WSB conducted a parking study that concludes that Southdale would have adequate parking, despite the parking stalls being removed to provide for the development. Based on information from the (ITE) Institute of Traffic Engineers Trip Generation Manual, the WSB traffic study concludes that 5,538 parking spaces are adequate to support Southdale. Therefore, there would be an excess of 334 stalls at Southdale. 5. In 2001, a variance was granted to Southdale for a shortage of 759 stalls. Over the past 10+ years, Southdale has operated very well without the code-required parking. 6. A 305 stall parking variance was also granted to Southdale in 2012, when Southdale One apartments were built. 7. A 610 stall parking variance was granted with the proposal to build a Hotel on the northeast corner of Southdale. 8. A 929 stall parking variance was granted with the proposal to build a Restoration Hardware on the northeast corner of France Avenue & 69th Street. 9. The City of Edina does not wish to require unnecessary paving or parking structures for parking stalls that are not needed. The City would rather have additional green space and building if applicable. This proposed project would add both. 10. The alternative to the variance would be to require the applicant to construct a structured parking ramp. Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Grading plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 25, 2017. • Building elevations date stamped September 25, 2017. Page 3 of 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click.here to enter a date. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Landscape plan must meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Mechanical equipment and trash areas must be screened from all public right-of-way. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated October 19, 2017. 7. Building plans are subject to review and approval of the fire marshal at the time of building permit. 8. Bike racks must be provided to meet minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Appearing for the Applicant Clif Poynter, Simon Properties Discussion/Comments • Planner Teague was asked if the Southdale Small Area Plan Working Group weighed in on this proposal. Teague responded that the Southdale Working Group has no review role; however, the guiding principles are addressed. • Teague was asked if he believes the use as presented meets what is allowed. Teague responded in the affirmative. The use as a restaurant is a permitted use, reiterating the proposal meets code except for parking requirements. Teague further noted as previously mentioned parking stall variances is how the City has traditionally addressed code requirements for the Southdale campus site. • Planner Teague was asked if staff was comfortable with the piecemeal one-way to two-way portions of the ring road. Planner Teague agreed that this proposal introduces another two- way element; however, it is private property and the design has been reviewed by the traffic consultants and City Engineering staff. Tony Kuppleman, WSB, said their findings indicate that the Southdale ring road operates at a level A in a rating system between A and E. With regard to one-way vs. two-way the one-way system works better moving people through the site; however, development along the ring road is better served as a two-way system. Applicant Presentation Mr. Poynter addressed the Commission adding at Sketch Plan Review the Council and Commission recommended some changes to include that the parking adjacent to France Avenue and the building itself be moved back to meet or get closer to the goal of a 50-foot green space setback from France Avenue. 960-feet of sidewalk will be added, including a new sidewalk wrapping the ring road from the France Avenue access through two 66th Street accesses to Drew Avenue. Poynter explained that all Page 4 of 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. parking on the Southdale campus is shared parking. He further noted that if parking would become an issue there is the option of building a ramp or adding onto an existing ramp. Concluding, Poynter said Simon is very excited about the projects along their ring road. Further Discussion/Comments • Commissioners expressed support for the additional sidewalks and pedestrian walkways. They did point out that the entrance off 66th Street West was unusual and suggested taking another look at that area (add signage). • Commissioners suggested that careful attention is made to the signage along the ring road to ensure safety and reduce any confusion that could occur with this new movement. Poynter responded that they would implement all measures to ensure traffic and pedestrian safety. A two-way standard yellow line would also be added to the ring road. • Reduction in parking was suggested allowing for more green space. It was noted a Proof of Parking Agreement could be implemented between the City and Simon. • At the time of Council review, consider enhancing the renderings that depict way finding, etc. Maybe create a sign plan for the ring road and entire site. • An opinion was expressed this this proposal may not be the highest and best use of the site with the acknowledgement that the submitted proposal meets all requirements except for parking, and again the subject site is private property. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Commissioners expressed the opinion that the property owner and developer have the right to redevelop their site; it was reiterated that there was uncertainty that the proposal as submitted was the highest and best use for the site. Commissioners indicated their support for the project as submitted. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved to recommend site plan approval with variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Chair Olsen reiterated that at Council review the applicant should provide a more detailed signage plan and pedestrian study to include assurances that the change from a one-way to two-way is adequately signed. Page 5 of 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. C. Subdivision for Market Street— Preliminary Plat Staff Presentation Planner Teague reported that the City of Edina and Edina Market Street LLC are requesting to combine and Plat the properties that make up the Edina Market Street Project located on both the north and south side of Market Street (formerly known as 49-1/2 Street). The purpose of the request is to combine all the parcels within the development to have clear clear legal descriptions. There are no changes proposed to the approved development plan, and no new lot is being created. The specific request is for Preliminary and Final Plat. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Preliminary and Final Plat of the lots on Market Street that simply combines all the lots on the property. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The resulting uses of the project meet all zoning ordinance requirements. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: I. Easement Vacation shall take place at the same time as the Final Plat at City Council. Appearing for the Applicant Cary Teague, City of Edina Comments/Questions Planner Teague was asked who would own the property. Planner Teague responded it would be City owned. He explained the subdivision really simplifies and cleans up all legal descriptions. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Page 6 of 8 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Commissioners expressed the opinion that the subdivision makes sense in achieving clear legal descriptions for Market Street. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the preliminary plat based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Community Comment Chair Olsen opened Community Comment. No community comment. VII. Reports/Recommendations None VIII.Correspondence And Petitions Chair Olsen acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. Chair And Member Comments Chair Olsen informed Commissioners that the Southdale Work Group is "regrouping"; adding Dan Cornejo will be the lead consultant with guidance from Mick. Commissioner Bennett said 44th and France is proceeding, adding that the last meeting went well. Bennett said he envisions no more than 4-stories in that area. Bennett also told the Commissioners residents of that neighborhood are very engaged. Commissioner Strauss said the 70th and Cahill Small Area Working Group have met twice, adding it appears to be a great group with balance. Strauss said at this time people are sharing what they like and what they do not like. Planner Teague was asked how the Estelle condominium proposal went. Teague reported that the request to amend the comprehensive plan was denied on a 4-1 vote. Commissioner Thorsen reported that he meets with Bill Neuendorf on economic development, adding these meetings are going well. Page 7 of 8 Draft Minutes® • Approved MinutesD Approved Date:Click here to enter a date, X. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported that a neighbor has appealed the decision by the Commission to approve a first floor elevation increase at 5712 Woodland Lane. The City Council will hear the appeal at their November 8, 2017, meeting. Xl. Adjournment Commissioner Bennett moved to adjourn the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:50 P.M. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. JaclI1 e -1-ooSevolZ1zer Respectfully submitted Page 8 of 8 STAFF REPORT (----.1A, �'�j� Oe ,/:4,, Ni , ,� L--2 �, °'''' .>>�"ox✓. 1868 Date: November 15, 2018 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subject: Subdivision with Variances—6017 Walnut Drive Information / Background: Robert and Shirley Hermann, are proposing to subdivide their property at 6017 Walnut Drive into two lots. The existing home on the lot would remain, and a new home built on the south parcel. The new lot would gain access off Walnut Drive toward the north lot line away from Vernon Avenue. To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 96.6 feet to 90 feet for each lot; and 3. Lot area variances from 12,611 square feet to 12,170 and 11,643 square feet. Within this neighborhood, the minimum lot size is established by the median width, depth and area of all lots within 500 feet of the property. As demonstrated above, the proposed lots are very close, but don't meet the median width or area. Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low-density residential. Vernon Avenue is to the south, with no homes located on the south side of Vernon. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single-family home and attached. The home will remain. There are a scattering of trees throughout the lot. The existing home appears to have a vacant lot next to it. maioica City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-dwelling residential Zoning: R-I, Single-dwelling district Lot Dimensions Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 12,61 I s.f. 96.6 feet 135 feet Lot I 11,643 s.f.* 89 feet* 150 feet Lot 2 12,170 s.f.* 88 feet* 140 feet * Variance Required Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (Memo from the city engineer is attached.) There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring properties. The home to be built on Lot I would drain toward the two streets, Walnut Drive and Vernon Avenue. A more detailed grading plan would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new home. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. History of Subdivision Requests in Edina The City of Edina has considered several similar subdivision requests with variances in recent years. Please note that the location of this site is not in the vicinity of all of these recent subdivisions, but the circumstances are generally the same. (See attached area map showing this locations of these requests...note that they are located in the Pamela Park Area.) History of Recent Similar Subdivisions I. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 4. In 201 I, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) I I. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) The proposed subdivision is similar to the Ewing subdivision in that the proposed lots exceed 9,000 square feet. Primary Issue • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met with this proposal. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? STAFF REPORT Page 4 Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot, and built a home on the north lot and maintained the east lot as a yard/vegetation. (See the attached original plat— Lots I & 2 Walnut Ridge.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than other properties in the immediate area. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or similar to existing lots in the area. The applicant is proposing to restore the lots into the form of the original plat. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances regarding the size of the lot, and that a previous property owner built on and developed the site from two lots into one. That condition was not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. A new single-family homes would be constructed on lots similar in size to all lots on this block. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 6017 Walnut Drive and the lot width variances from 96.6 feet to 88 & 89 feet, and lot area variances from 12,611 square feet to 12,170 and 11,643 square feet for each lot. Approval is based on the following findings: Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The original lot was platted as proposed by the application at 88 & 89 feet wide and 12,170 and 11,643 square feet in size. 3. The proposed lots would be similar in size than all lots on Walnut Drive. 4. The proposal re-establishes the original Plat. STAFF REPORT Page 5 5. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique practical difficulty to the property caused by actions of a previous property owner that developed two lots into one. b. The requested variances are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is both larger and wider than most properties in the area, including the adjacent lots to the east, west and north. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. c. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the proposed lots are of similar size to others in the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Nine Mile Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district's requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated November 3, 2017 d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. Deadline for a City Decision: December 19, 2017 .. . 6017 Walnut Drive - Site Location Map 1---- 1 T -H ---.,..._._ -- -,----------- - - , .. ..,, s ...i I , ,. \ , t--------1:, / ,•' ..N1 _.i _... / •, \\11 ---. i \\\ • i . / t 2, t I \ 1 g.2 t------t 1 4 1 ft ,•=. ,1 •---.„ 1 - 1 --------___t__ ,- , ---, I „ _ "---- I.- I 1------i 1 , , , • ,---------- / 1 i1 1 1 T-------, x \ , 1 --1 1 ----- i Ii -. / 1 I Walnut 1 • Ridge Park t---- ' ---.Tr- I ir I --- '", \s, t angt% 1- 1-------- 1 I i 11 , 1 ! , ,,, , ,.... 1- -- II I — _...._ I I . r...-• ! 1 I 11 L r -;--<,.. : ‘..i.,1.:, '5 I ' ..!... I • 1._—..._.___ .) '-'-j 1 H .>\..- ,K „.../ ..._....___ I i ------ 1 .-' __ ! I ,------ ..,- . • \i'--j' 1 fr .1 -I 1— I VV.• - ../ 1-----.,-/ \_.--•-\., . ...;,\ -------1 1 / - - C \ /.-. -... ...,.\ , „...• ".• \0..„\ / ) 7\ c_O'Dt ,...- ..,' 'I -) —1---1—L- - - \ ., ---- .--- , , - ' / ..„- \.. 1 \ 1-, 7-------7---7.-------\----r-----12,---1 ,......... ,..„. .....„. .,,,.--- I i i 1 I / ..._ ..... i__...., \ \ t /. i c --4 --- -- ••.,, J/ -- t---:,,, ., , i ,.., / '_.-,- , -.. •,....3....(..„.: / ...-- ._........._ I , •, • i •\,) t.-----------J-------,--J )---. L.-. ]." ' -- ...-. ; ------- -:.---, i.,..-. ,...---- 1 i \ .'s •`, ' 1 •------ 51---------- '.... / ---`..,--.-- 1 ..\ \ \ $ , \ 1 . i li , ,.„... ,,.., 7,,___._.. ,_ • / ,„- ,,,,-; ..\,..„„• .,,,,,,,, ... ,,,..c.,,,, -/ ,,,,,N (..„;,,,..,.., .--.- \,,,, ------Arcti-c-A;viay-- , I? 2__•=--/ /::,,,: _ 1 1 1 1 1.__-- l• -- A .L_..L.__ _- ._._..... /C---3:\?'971 i 1 I 17 1 FIT 1 1 ITT-Tt-j. 1 Il---1- 1- \ _F__-::?_::1,::: ,.. I der-t-i-LLibtLi-14‘,I:i_It...1.,L1.1----1 I 11\----11-' 1- 1 -_-7.17::::-\--91-3°:n-L6T1 ,_ , , \ r-i---,-,\: \ 1 i 1 i i i / i I 1 1 -,-L„... i li 1 _.',____J-1----"L / L±..LLL \_ I -\,--.'-' b. _..,_ / r -----. Edina,Hennepin,MetroGIS I©WSB&Associates 2013 ,....-- \ /- ---- I T1--------------- McC9,0- 1 in=376 ft --. ....,.. *the CITY of ---\\ ( N r _ • EDINA w+E s November 6, Map Powered by DataLink 6017 Walnut Drive - Site Location Map . . Valli , I I r 1 . , ,.... , , . ''- , ,,y, .. , t • s.,, , „- .1 ' , ,., il • L , „, ‘ "' / `, , , 1 • '''' " k. , i .::', : ,_- cm ,: 41•••'' • , 1, , : , ,P, ik." - .•,* -7-1W j`t,&,„,, L.., . , t its '''';,t....- ,t,..1 ap. , f.,!:`,.: • , ,.." j • i —11011t .1 - - ' r ..1‘. 1,. A ,,, ., , , .. t t. ' ". ! t . 1.k- mift 1 , rik., ... , .. ., I , , rum ,, , i v,.... . • e'.Pt r i , st , ig- II •* iiiP4" -1. 14 I I k , E Aik ilk -„ . s it, - , • ola i, 'Fre, 1th, ;* .. ' ' ', 0 - „&„ .4','' I . t \•1100t\k e .-. , .. , . ''k I 1 1.- ' 4 tr , F--" ra1' - . . JO • .22/.. 14P7 IP lil.' .** ' ,„ It • kr *2 11 - f ,,s,, • Igryit-1,::0P 4," • I $ 4 4 —• OirN '°2• $ 4 * , r fr ir • . - • , si re i I . . ,. 1 . a . e i k • . w . , r ‘ , ‘„,t, %, 4tvoetik...,:..4",c." I il*. ''...), ''' t k 1,.„' . ' , IN'. "1 1 I ,,,t •r•.. P ik ., •"'/O,N, . ''''0, .t *g .' , ', 3 ' CI 't. • 1 1,, I ...it . ,.4 • -• 'Ark N -p 1,'. • ` r .. .v., -4-*n . ..,,..i 4,,,,, 1.-3,. -..- iii. ‘_da.le c--, • ,ft.• • •411111es.,•it, Nib ,`•;-.) , 4------c...-lits i vorsedit g I ,A,i, .• * * , • ,.,.„1 • , ki N‘'4 ..., ,„, ' .$9 1 , t 15 i ot • , . ,. ig t „ , •at.,.., i. .„ z; * ,, ,.• , „•,. t ' .r,. ", ., •" • ,i•Ail.*1,2 *2 I ,.0 i ;,.. : i / . - - t ''' i:lEi ,t' , ,,..- ,N. ', -'is 7.'w . „,".+1,ii 'is ' i` 4.i..7.4.• •`,4,; c rt's,:.r*Iiiggs.-- • r', .4. r, ,,,, '. ----- " ''''' ' , At •IK, i !-.,N,. s ' ' 100 ''''t' ' 1 ' I,. r ' %.1„,..•,,„,?-,., 1 , "" , ... t. ', .. ,.;' . . 4 .tk' • „ i '' '• t14,,,,. -1% ' atii.' tk. 4• '` t*. 11.-' Ifilli' r ' :-. t --,-. ' i ' '' ), ' il 1,1.2-- .tli. .02,t '74;,:i 'y.. $ ",. /N i /% N. 'I'''% N‘ -.T131•'' ' t- ti. ' K,V., I• '‘ / • ,'s .4,;`,•, .., .‘ 1,- .,.....,: ' A441ip ... -liN ‘ :, c. . :kkir•i;-. I 1 '.., 11 ' • 1 ,k,.„. :„ ;,.'.14 .. A i ,,„). vilik4r PI t/2 i.' lc lit,,,,, ;1,!' 4.',' • it op 'W.'%I. ik:''' '' '''''14.,11118?Vn/ '2 \;:g1'22 r ,94.'', •k'' ' 410 -•*°-44 ' '* t`l,' * *' .'''' '''' '' ''' 7:si ''. ‘. (,. 1-.1•4" ' '''\ " , '40 4., ',..."',"- ' : , ,4,',.,-1/4. '04, 4,, k. , crt ',.; '.0,,,„1-,-",„.i ' ,....',• X ", zgt,,,* , . ' BAssb 1-1airjk,41 InieNre-G"IS14VVS: & ,-ores •,® 3, N erpl 2015 , ' f,',;,r''', "tt .., 1PN. r.., ,,1", ,t, 4 ' , , ••-,,,,..' ; ' ' ' -II '' '''114'41371''' ''''44-....;1111-'4" ir ''''`' -mall 1 in= 188 ft ,,s:. •A,.41-; 11'1** 'The CITY of ...,. M EDINA N . ...,_ .....,:i. W-+E November 6, Map Powered by DataLink ) 6017 Walnut Drive - Site Location Map . .... r, I r t,grist*,, ' ;#,1.1„, te.,. ' .t, * • •... *,..or f . , ie. 0, ritV ".! ',,, ` • -,, -- 4 4 t 4 I , . „... Ad. 9 . ‘i. i II 1 ,' '. ' .i• ir:4 • \ , ,, a .....• 4 1 b i , • i N.,..,..,,t . r i .....; . k ! , v7...:;,..( - ,.. . ... , ._ ,•, . • ,„,,; . .,. . ..„ . I „ _ ... .4, . . . 00,,... , , . x , ,i ,, .4. . ,.. ...,..t.. ,,, • . _.... ..- .t . . • --- ._ .- ........ "... , ,, .o. .., 4...- „ . , , . t. . „A-, t.. • ' . - , IA,„ .., , '''Aq : %. ' n . ,r, ' ,. -7, ,'-, ' . •; , , 9 i .0.i • • t t 1 ik ttitter ' C. t‘.4 . . . .- .0. t • . 4 t = . 4 :..1#'‘' • '''',1r :.. •,' ,... ..A . .. NJ .9 9 ., 9 • a ' , . 44 )0 11,`;'. •, , • ,, . , „, .,w;-,44 "r* , p,,,,,, A,...„,.,,,, 4 ,',C'1* 4' - - rf I; 't ...- %.. ....,,' .141„.. rigi 1.1.0 4 "la- -14 X,' .• 'ftt‘ ...'' i>*‘le .1.... 4,„ , ,1 i - -,i- ...- ‘,... , ..... N isi4' ., ,w1- ', • .'4'," *. t' t ' ' A', ' ;, : • I ''' '-...,1„. e'lti' '.;,, . •. • \itk *'frk,, ..: 4 * ,' 444'4 P, sitifk t• , \ .. ‘ ' ''''':'''''''''-'4' ''''t ' 114"' . EA;iiia i--1 erirdi'.4frprin4f\l`efro.GIS:118VV4.,SB,&Associates 2013 fl-INoReAiall i.,.20.1 ,disii. 4 ...-Nt: I in 471t The CITY of ( ) W+E ,„ t., GIN •- ‘,.. ‘-,i4 k....‘ ,-F - . /-''' EDINA L .,...--,/ -,,„... s November 6, Map Powered by DataLink 6017 Walnut Drive - Zoning Map ..„. 1 . ..,R, , . Walnut • .0. - , A, • s'• /o, 4` • • ,:ni, ------1 _ .." • - 14 r • • • • • • 1,2, , • • • A-4.4.. • _ 1 • 4 I ••• , 1 ie C>,,.- - 1,4---- ,z J -,' ..-- Niel° .,'• t\. 9., -.-; 0,...,, •• , 4. , '''' 11," , 4•4•4$• =-..=„ Acl cWai 14 s ." 4 ''''' ' •...4 •'01 • 4.=--,-- . 41.... ..,...-- \ *44 —=— '17::.,* ••.,t,.e.• 4....=—.....-=-- ....: ,4:....- .....:., - . — - ..1--1.--.22,-..„„-. ., 1 . . r•- '..4 \' 4 -.•I/ 4 m . . ,... ....m...m. 41r0: 4 ' ' \ 4 ,I, At*•...,.. , _ 44, i...1....... -A.4.4. 4," I \ ,./••Nr4 .••,•1 2 4"m -.*mammon. \ 4' '"-- • i mx f../4 t ... 44 ;_ .. .....-•' • ó4 --1( ',4"' 4,1 P.* +4.. +4.4 , ), •4•4'' rt.. -417..44"; 4.; 111: 7r r, 4: 41 : -rrw_i• t4 ; 0 4 . , 4 ., .; 4; .; $4; aiii 1 \4.0 4 ; 41' .4 4 • , • 4,° . o 4, .141‘..., kw= • I • NA. 4..A.4. .i. ,:k-41- -4", ,t .ta..:, t,41 • -''' n 1 C i 4, ' 0 4 ' • 4 ' 40 : , 40 ' , r-0 wir 1 ir "'V.", -'; ' ‘'.,' - '".4. ..° .4 ,4 . ,""1. , ' • ..'t 4 b 4 , A # b !•.,- Edina,Hennepin,MetroGiS I©WSB&Associates 2013 1 in=376 ft ItA , , Zoning 1j PRD-4 LI POD-1 0 PSR-4 R-1fIll PRD-5 [ POD-2 n MDD-4 t..., ,; '''''''''r•-n fril:,.... The CITY of C.". %MI.MI/ :.i'. V R-2 •( PCD-1 D RMD ID MDD-5 .c.; EDINA N ,.•'•, .--f' i ,, PRD-1 vi PCD-2 L j PID .' 1 11MOD-6 w+E Frl PRD-2 Li PCD-3 pi PUD S t November 6, , - I j PRD-3 r-.45 PCD-4 1 J APD Map Powered by DataLmk Nsa w Fi w OOW .i? W 6IP,VgIu a0~¢a ~ } 3WxgW< of rN r,w-ua ¢ ow mr �`-' u as 'ira ZxV OULLWFO a - A - JO�¢O ¢rOW? p rW ZW..0 Z N„ yP .3 uoW n Z - ¢ a '�� ,..�noww zz ,„1,1,7 n N a z ¢ allo�¢ i ri W W a ''.1 Nu YO KtgrOaD P 1 0��� WH iU a0a aYuy FD NW O 0 8a >_ � oo �i c LLr'z ?Al >y w o„WnF 3;wF 5cwam� N o �`,� ¢ a �S wF7>Z '^4Fl,:o3 O> m O Z N ZOUKOZ 62KRj Z j0 ii WI¢2 F yor ZQ F i W g klig O O J Wa m3=. w Nt Z W 1:1.!,q.!; w ¢Ww G �2Pn Nj •'N iW WO gWWOy�a O O O •OWN �N ¢ W N �FWWt� 4I1U'J V O O 0 UVN ¢OC Z`O yJn cZ¢OJO Ox11! N YW. p FOF QrW � 2 COui% I a��xN3 yu O i pp� wi ro%F oyLL o m•i,im aw eo y_F Fqr 2<m ;lib. iWaQ< '2`1?-2F- Ga¢O€= J :W'm mW jWZW aF.Wo 2`Ng` � Ig _= . i a; SW Hyj•= 31-a?x YYy=W :iii: i ” <O ¢ 5Ny3 FFON_Z N¢ V< Nla-INm JZJZ z write '0"W°�cc< ww � ¢aaW ri � W �_ o Iowa �°. roc -LL ulna ``41 igbt; t11, r > ww �wzo8r nIZ"¢ nom a m` rover _ raa ozx <aWt Wa.1.,OF i Jo pZi F•o3 'w rtuN Wm jWZr' WeDa3¢ 3 Oi m0 xwOf ONyxJ2W a0 xNt ' n0 Fo �m � � _ Wa¢O 712i!:.; pN=?N RZCf nW FP! �uR«Q00 YSWpa ~ nC4FO ~a 00<p Gf tv iN N�"_UN - Oiw 6 NOOaN �W - OJW On O yaZy W W_ieFNxZNwnz mr-Nw - w�a - 5; ":1t--12i:‘§'!:‘'.1::2 .3roPror�¢ ¢ ws a � WW0p0 ¢�¢0 iw a W�Nnm i o'uoW 2_Ww6 vyi �z.• aoz .uW m gZ 5s O fNWF anLLLLF¢ .-.r. Q g. ufi N IS Es Ft - •i Wi O O WOV aia;;150< _ W mFwiQ6WO0iww O w¢ trig`,-;;150 oy ¢ �^ ¢ ¢O as i.W1 ,-h nwz ri EN wi2HFaN¢ iW u000 WWZ'f-a„'y„aOr WO; iO�ZU~U ;,140aam - 3a 3¢ $O�iZQO W ZWVO i O>iViY N¢H�W yZWNa OmQ Zj�Oy W� w 1- 40pNliP4 wi Sir W O _NY a LLJV J< .F ¢� iurc7 0 _ =¢N¢;pwro i ZWQ ii cN n Z¢n¢N,VwWNV�Uw mW3W n Fa Q4Na0p fu _ s Q N2 litTi p2 0; '52-11: Y NUZOZi¢alx-W N �aC YE �-g iigm1)NfNN <OUN O JUx Z z •fir y \ 1 s'''d` .. 9J�N s•rnr;aoe>s'„s'��7�s'x..Jre �� by-0'06 .--_-_-%LBid- ---096 +1,-099 . W 4,� I cr \c p.0. \ 0 c0 a N m s00 ' CD IWJ I 0'09 ...4', / 2 •'IN; Y99/'6.y •06 .a..r•o O.P k�� g 3niao in” .,:4.,„ ^ �va I- __._ �oa. rs 00G oc Ls ar° z\ Z ^l• „ 006 . • o:E1 - .. I ,09 C \\\ O 9 c G W , 1 _ CC O z 1 N gr . Z d 1 i J W h !' , Y6 Z 1 - Z ryy la' oos 4 Q W 1 3.8' .„ w -J Q rh U U 0) W Z /� Z 7 G5436 We purchased the home at 6017 Walnut Drive, Edina, MN -55242-2 in May of 1991. We purchased the property with the two lots because we loved the extra space and we knew it would be a good investment. We are now retiring and have found a buyer for the house. The new buyer is interested in the possibility of selling one of the two lots. However we have found that the two lots are considered a single entity and are joined by the tax PID number. We have learned that we must go through the city of Edina's subdivision process to separate the lots, giving them separate tax PID numbers. Only then will our potential buyer consider purchasing these two lots with the one house. Our house, on lot 2, fits very well into the neighborhood of like homes. The house contains 1,400 sq. ft. with a tuck-under garage. Lot 1 could easily accomodate another house that would meet city set-backs and compiment the neighborhood. Lot 1 is a nice corner lot on Walnut Drive and Vernon Ave. The typography and the trees on the south side of lot 1 makes a buffer from Vernon Ave. Further, across Vernon Ave, to the south, is a public dedicated woods that were partly financed with funds from home owners in Walnut Ridge. These woods are never to be developed. We have spoken with many of our neighbors and they are in favor of returning this property to a two-lot status to maintain the character of the neighborhood. We respectfully request that you grant us a tax PID number for each lot. Thank you for your time and your careful consideration of this request. xce O� LOVED THE EXTRA SPACE AND WE KNEW IT WOULD BE A GOOD INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE WHEN WE RETIRED. IF NOT APPROVED IT SEVERLY DROPS OUR VALUE. OUR HOUSE CURRENTLY ON LOT 2, FITS VERY WELL INTO THE HOMES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IT ISA 1,400 SQ FT HOUSE WITH A TUCK UNDER GARAGE. ANOTHER HOUSE ON LOT 1 COULD BE BUILT THAT WOULD MEET CITY SET BACKS AND COMPLIMENT THE NEIGHBORHOOD. LOT 1 IS A NICE CORNER LOT ON WALNUT DR. AND VERNON AVE. THE TYPOGRAPHY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOT 1 ALONG WITH WITH NICE TREES GIVES IT A BUFFER FROM VERNON AVE. ACROSS VERNON TO THE SOUTH IS PUBLIC DEDICATED WOODS THAT WERE PARTLY FINANCED WITH FUNDS FROM HOME OWNERS IN WALNUT RIDGE. OUR FIRST TIME OWNER IN THIS SUB-DIVISION G. WEINER , MADE SURE WE KNEW THAT THE WOODS ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR HOUSE WAS NEVER TO BE DEVELOPED. IT IS NICE TO HAVE THIS EXTRA PUBLIC WOODS TO THE SOUTH. WE HAVE TALKED TO MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS AND THEY ARE IN b ' � as 3 S Ulf U. 211 P6a kv _a ¢� k N I GI o f g Let a a ■ 5 / \ E E06 E i. k 8 b 3 ® 88 p \`\ / EEE . aig � ? � kid &$ & \ I �-- \ „ < T77 f / \\\\ r I, tI ®® *I �I s 1 v '� \1 \ // \\\ \ 1 N 1 - - ; / \\ • \\ ,�.y.1 • • \ // / ��\ \ \ i�l • \ /• % % ', ` \\\\ \\ os - k "▪did ---f-- --04 -' :,�,\ lin W= z -kms-- ---,\;7\-,\\`�, .k +a'" " ' i ft v k.li r ill'-'—i- /\\ °c l s'\ a�•'''`�\‘‘, \ \` �. / / i til-;\1., i5 i P .. - Ar-y_, .,, •,••4- '' \\‘' ,.V\‘. \ f' il • . /I r ` l i ! a`' r ,(i.\7\\ 1 yy t } d$$n ISI \A1t1\\1\ty " _ `-\ • / 6://axp 6u9s,3 ii - 89 'Wp@,E•i \ \ �� A., ♦`4 _ ,t1y Q\ \ '\/..-\ ..``r��l WQ II ` ° �Cii' T� y;. � �'��°� , i'`p 7 a;;\\`,i� „pi ;II i i aa 4 ,i� ^�';;,-, s"1 -" //+.V cd \ f $ �' !$ 1 kyr-=$- G ,` r L: . - i k \ \ hp� \ „L -peal..um+� --d. -x` ,�. - 63:5 -- V-S'm V��= ' �— 1 ` \\ • • ▪ \ 1 ,_. ,,,N.---•/ '.-1a Iflue 1\`% i i \\\ `E ____k_s i'�puriut\ \ !\\ \, I `\ '\ Sid /� T 6 R €g \ h \ s 1 �/ / / b I / 1 .e x of III F-Esae// s e 8 3� ..- Bz iE I S: E` 2 r3 3l ? L; s o.e- aE 3€b 3pt_i. .s _ e .1 ;I FIs .h 0.91 WT Lee. ,. _?.±. sg = 1 Y E • C o�y sEno E a 8� :g a ill 1s P f Vi .,: -2ys t'0E r€'�� F"� �' t 1 I` $i in 3o El °IIgel' =� -E —h.! awoE9 Y_ xa¢y na 5: p Iii ag ..° -.gz,t Ill L s°4` ql c I.Ci " -„!,.E°a .L• b il 386 P+ III oai :ills ii ag a.go, o°z. 11.0WO 11 g• !ti-e.3 i°® 'E E45E P.',8812.9 �E 9S Ga° E gg.. fi e lin$ . 11: $f. s e R °3�.5_EWo „C ,•+' A E g °`o o Ssg.556'E gg � ant 8 ��s" x� ig4s�e1 k.z ., . €§ mti, �T a0. r < � �I E. IL"' 11 �-2 ' °s E E a r aw a .. �.- !'g_PIl Olio Q`- B.. `-$@ S Sm '° �'.og.,°5 e •$ �' s o� � 8e - �n� � Ex "S�` �e9 6� " 1-0.1”.= 11 = els h '8iia` a €L,1 sod it z o �€ - 6 E e "e-- g H - . g., .., » 'a z a g° i'xExecE 6"s€ ] $ p � gs e8„W ESgygEgt ;ay O' o? ° ..x „i'E E s1'3.0i_ 'p y e g N5� °E'A�;,'�„�� x=y38°°°- o� ..�.. E :1.7......0 a"�= � S 2a 1§�s�s�y§g�sgi x_&;�l@j� Si off am._q aevu a `'2�8'�E�„9_ F= F °r°,_ .0 a o z 5e I .0 $ §a`aa"§§§•.t it siiikg as aE°. EoE A`'-'s�eE.2$_g"k'0 ma"E = € EEt.E la3v._aa. 1&6'e aII!L ;o9Er-:m.z8 '=Ee'E9 9 .,zm• a Ii* ` eE.xe 1Illii !&U x?e€ ron ;1 F3 841q,-41/� ma . °o�z.�'�33yy� o„_ yy "� "_`�' - � p � �a 6E$ e ¢FE.$ xia.��$� a z �"a�el"� El ;1 `9m. E� EU .nIE!o 01;;I° 1 Woo qr-� .1- ! a Ex El o _E'3. o�'O3 §„- 9a o .. IL Eaa- a$' °F° � _ Wti€ AYlein °''� sE . g,,, 3 p. all a x. lx g2 5 , o_ �Ay -y °°<�.=_dE=SZn �9�g9E 3a v3 u � /L . .!.Y-it.g.e$€s`o 3e�o�`< 9' <� a P a3 - .Vm< a N4 mm=tea°yF aS12-i z° a.°3' Fi �- . . . Preliminary Plat of Herrmann Hill Addition e of our :cription I and that I of such 1 shown I site.We ite. The I at least •before tplained ices the I twhich N835521"E __ :rvice to --144.83-- ion you r.°v°:°e o�mw� °°e outnery_ E°�mmr__It––I 5 ' g,I„,,9 Seth°° e siding r— — Minos(rel°°rk°yak) ' Ccntain5 I I I G� ` JI 12,110 54,14, f.' Z3o o 4 I !I I I 0 0 1 1;11010 $g Ivi I GNP 3 I r•:.1°.1‘C. i i �' /'! I 1 III I _ �`01 O 1 1 j – / a Ep°6,0at �r n�l f.:\ I — �=a'UM1ty �J I 1$ ' I ./.,,v_51=-�ppM°9° °n EOSMn°nt=`'— 1 aa 1 I of d7,�14``0��w,a,,!— I s l 1/ i o�PFP VI-- 1 250 15 ent,\ I 1 r1 n ... ......-A.-".... i.v..- 11,6143 51.Ft k 1 \ 1 I I to i \ it ~zso / $II I I i - // t:11 Z I I I 11 1 / o f 15 I \ /J ,' I \I / co II \ oP co a os 1« - -� ' 1 I I % / ,-� I t 1 ii II 1 010d�W��°d 0 Mlnims(t�P 1 1II t 144 41 30.0_ 8 I so.o em r /otaltr E°: RSj 5t t \.._ I od ' I 1 110 I /, , `a o^ 1 I I ed ptoino9 �azs.so;� w1oP° �0e R=14.00. :' 8.0.0' " 25 go5�.E A,ie `,o '62Zo 0° / W-. tl ori clt, 141 5: r 1 a jGw^ 1 V 6 0 0 o <C k'w o y w MaW 3 ''$ b k b I \\ 3.f0,SL00 N \ _— --00051-- e----\ II ]--00Yl-- - --pp Sl-- I ' 1X,1 m \ r\ 31 � II III �, \ II , _1 __-II sill S I—--—\ \\ �\ r-1 11\ r-1 11�S A \1° 1�1 \ \ 1,45:-n rI 1 T I '"1 1 \ \ \ •�Z�°i'a� O� O '" 1\� IIIA\ \\\ �� e°•� \ C fF }, ' \� \ \\,,a. 1\ E} l a) II 1 1I I I _ \ tai•. O 1 .�, I _ _ ---- x.-k2,..- 1 0 - nmd'e -- - —nza r:Li arecaa % -———_——————— 9.9L-9009 , 13;61 651413" CI -------.PY1VC P-4 g1 lE0. Wa Pit a Eq 4 k E ,-.41A £ mmilE Y1�.1 Q m -k'Y€ Pz, .- .1 14-214'_� _8 eg Wo; �.. F0. 4� _ O'i � 3gtt 1 °=mesas WI 8-� ss.8g. •E §Poop_ .- g ° .2g 4,h4i8T1 i§ s 'AtN @ P s i g;:t;"%k8 74,t6 3 .�g 2 $-. ,,0 w 6 'xx l u o y'E I B £� f T, ,5 4 19. Pt ,1 .8 = ,g.1.. , ,' O m 91388 v.5CS=mmc°o,°,�.g EYE c2 �, ...° c raII . @ z v o¢m h'7,.. 92e'6'11J 8.. O-"" FAVOR OF RETURNING THIS PROPERTY TO THE TWO LOTS TO MAINTAIN THE CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. BOB HERRMANN SHIRLEY HERRMANN e Preliminary Plat of Herrmann Hill Addition \ i ,--- ___________ _________ • Top casting-891.7 y \ I .„,vert-879.0- \y \ \ `i ------ •Q ----_,.... The eery Edlno I to r}-scoped Is service - ___ t and It/fs open. The / A // ---- os-ytat plans say It i X 894.3 N 83.55,21"E - 8935 I I Is abandoned. X894.4 / X893 893.5 �// 894A 89X 894. 144.83-- era :s{a \ J xe9a0 xe94.4 __ and UINI E°sem_ ye / - I , _- On31dc9e __•ipr---- -- 5 I \ / / / X 894.5 R 895.2_Pr�pOsad ---__________/_-.-_-.-.- . :91.6 .,,10:90 --q6�: - I \ / S / 894.1 s r._.--L,----___ �J - x 89�:...n.� (tlfn nurm Building$etb°rte- 896.9 t `` 1 I I /• rC. :� 5 2968 s991N�fr(TjplcoT Lm8 ,t,......_ zsl{� -- 1 x^10 \ I 8..7y I"894.6_4J6 : 28.0 C(AILQnS -II -I I \ \ I 893.9 �'b .,•. Gbfro9 FIOar _�t�.}�}�.,q��,yy 25.0 _ c H • .•9t, �'CA_ J •°i°£xfstin�' • ' B95. e `/'� IG,17V 4 I L,-I--� I \\\ \\ 1 �b .I.'•' ..Ret. .al:. "' IW 1 \ I c ;/I- 1 8952 . Existing -9�•+ \ bi• .v s.. ' '.,i�14 Ilia x900.5 "2Rbee.7. I I 1 \ Dwelling e9 1399-4'°--- Vii" '� 090u'B ' (To Remofn) 1. 900_9-� _ l O t 4 \\ \__-1 891I tl 901.- lV a/d at 9047 1 1 I `,1 i\ \ / 119].9 '4. -,L3 - / to I A in ,II 8'9.3 •mrd 4` I ,, \ / b 11 1171'9:1'93 :.6' stkiy; 'door 90.E .:t:b. '"'.•'�-___`I I \ \ C 03/O I ,l I/ 899.7 712 ` .�p,..• `'IC- I 7;:e\I<J\ss, \ \ \t. 10I' (/ 901.- ,,y$. X902.6 �ri I �.894 I.h tl 30 __ .9045x/_• t\° • 9022 902A \\ \99..1 i - I 1 $" �-- 900.1 \ I q° .1 / _ I.: \ 1--4 a ., i I 1 4 {' x 1B.t ..�X Sol.}b 1 ' I C -...„.... •: „ .• 9°z -.BJ - to own ^r \ �all . 45.1_ _ _ \\ \�� E 1�, 1 I I t 09ou r Existing 9az.=�=8-� d I� .7,�_ 1 \ \ \ P , t , Woff___ cn ant I 1 1 1 '!'8900 / dc' -if' �r9os -x- ,t3,, I \ \ \ 3 re 3.s ,, 1 1 �1\ I I ,9�froP°5Bd_� and :, ,,,,,E5-gru t z9zS0 r5 906.7\ \ \1893.6 , O G6`� { 1\ 1111' \1 /rr_ "� `•�NI.9- .k. B x 9053 I- \. \ •1 \ 8.7.3 \U. P as ✓~`�_ Cl ngains\- j i `,' I ogg ) 1 \` I - k of s9e�;-, , .B /P �1 a `�g0�8 I I,�43 5a,fit, 8 0 , / on II\ 7ot�l \ ' i,,f �� 1,/� /// "// 905. ` '�' 9066/ / t / /' I 9s.bh"\'"• P,,_____...4-------\ o\ ` 1/// roposed 9'� ,„/1„., I 1 / ,- i' i� \\ * o Dwelli //NSTALLSILTFENCE-: L- \ O�� \ -41 \ 2 a 1 \sea\ ' � a� 'I _ /les 0 /� �' c,--I- >a 1'4. u. X895.4 \ 2'0 :_ 0 C 90 // s INSTALL ROCK--___ _______ ___92.0-I�..I \ �\ a. Vic.. n\ yet., / 90'"-' 1/ ix-/ ' - // Caysmucnav \ „....•-• ----' ��\ \o ��`\ rJ -997 0 s' // _ ENTRANCE PER NOBS/ �{I \'891 \ $ �` ieLiii j /% -- e91.6F `D'11�o 1 \ \ W°II \���� �. ice/ // -� 891.6 \w Q ,��, // - I I \\ 1 j\, ��\�95 80�``09�BSB g9g K}�.0k0;14 ���+�y iN51��5/� '/' j _ c ' oe pta� 7�� / i \ l'\ I',7:k.1.1....s.0.0__"\_\,-- y \ 88.86W-s°0�i�9 Stla"�, -i:1/ji/�// / "1- LEGElINSTALL SILT FENCE---- s90.5 \.. % 1 t C0°,I°II}n-°oi� /�/ �/ ',, 91z 890.3-.�� 4 \ F \ . , YL°9i u 1c //// _ ////�/ 991Top Basting-890.5 - \ \ esa -_ 1 0 //a�8��',- / 4 , ,:9°"'/evert-8798- p \ 5 Itl° �f. - L'`F30. _�_- w\ \ \ 1 _.. 9a5�a591P5 /y .9 090 �?I\ \ \ z e 897�ob �wiiA9�9�9._, 1ya ''1',, 1 nto _, // / . 8,°9.41 193.1 `_ C. -995 ,�/ V' /.'� ' Ic 899.1 •\/ ,.� o� ,,,f.....-::,:?>''' _��i 88 --• e lr' 889.3. \ I - w.- �� 1""v (� V /'' 9 ��� -_/ '�-„, 62 .... 888.7 Gan ^a iEl I 1,-'8.8\8.7\sl.,.........,,..„.." Z0';'---14 /' .b. Bees •Bee.l I / / 0904 tri 18886 * ,'' X�e9'( /.. ,t 998.4 \ /�� ,/ b. i �8 x 688.1 / .`. �O I 13' t /; //:% :•!..,,,,,088.2""• .:89. Veit / I GC''''. , /,, 8882 / ----______- / ��\,, / ; / Z887.6 `19a 8892 / \ Address Area Depth Width 5944 WALNUT DRIVE 11643 119 97.2 6000 WALNUT DRIVE 12756 147.4 90.8 6004 WALNUT DRIVE 12934 145.2 90.6 6008 WALNUT DRIVE 12088 135.5 88.6 6012 WALNUT DRIVE 12007 133.8 88.8 6016 WALNUT DRIVE 12543 134.8 92.1 6020 WALNUT DRIVE 12446 130.6 92.4 6024 WALNUT DRIVE 12656 129.4 95.4 6015 WALNUT DRIVE 12565 140.9 89 6009 WALNUT DRIVE 12437 133.3 92.6 6005 WALNUT DRIVE 11558 119.3 92.6 6001 WALNUT DRIVE 11691 113.2 98.8 5949 WALNUT DRIVE 11780 114.6 96 5945 WALNUT DRIVE 11259 115.5 90 5928 TAMARACK AVE 11701 130 90 5932 TAMARACK AVE 11701 130 90 6000 TAMARACK AVE 11700 130 90 6004 TAMARACK AVE 11700 130 90 6008 TAMARACK AVE 11700 130 90 6012 TAMARACK AVE 11700 130 90 6016 TAMARACK AVE 11700 130 90 6100 ARCTIC WAY 18664 172.9 130.6 6102 ARCTIC WAY 15879 163.5 106.6 6104 ARCTIC WAY 13889 140.1 104.6 6106 ARCTIC WAY 13595 139.5 102.9 6108 ARCTIC WAY 17062 146.6 111.1 6153 ARCTIC WAY 16190 111.9 154.7 6151 ARCTIC WAY 13587 138.6 101.5 6148 ARCTIC WAY 14808 151.3 101.6 6150 ARCTIC WAY 14854 170.6 102.6 6152 ARCTIC WAY 16391 114.9 151.7 6103 ARCTIC WAY 17206 165.8 105.8 6101 ARCTIC WAY 14339 129.7 99.1 6537 POLARIS CIR 16907 143.1 125.8 6533 POLARIS CIR 19328 158.4 105.8 6505 POLARIS CIR 16267 152.6 125.5 5933 TAMARACK AVE 8710 67 130 6017 WALNUT DRIVE 23851 139.2 180.6 Mean/Average 13156.34 131.2895 99.6 Median 12610.5 133.55 96.6 • ' : : ! !! I ', I I : t.___I , : 1 : ,' i L. .-----. , . 1 !—771. 1 i I I .. —LL- -1,--•----I :, \ ...-- ' i '''; — , I i 1, . i , ! ..._. ......_.... 1'....., ,,,,-ii,..., .... --7-", ,,---i----I,-1--- r--- r--r- ______ !!.! I ,i. i ( !!!! !!!!! _ ; ,,,,s,,,, r-<!-;;,c;;-, ; !--7-7-1-- -- - -1---1—I' i f [ I 1 ! ! I -------- -- - - ---I- --1 t - : :. , ! 1_ - Li_,_ _I_ 1 ' 1 ....._ 1 t• 1 I . ., 17,I i '•-;-- -I .._! . ,.1•• ---.;‘,,- _ ITi ----I ;- 1- I I /r"---1; , --,1 - • "-- ';,-)- ......r.--- , -1.. .i— . .; , -:- ; i , i..-I it , 1 t , :,.•,_ ; iii :, ..i . 1 ! . ! i ' i -6;.%;!-• ,!/--- / / :- 1 / /!-• 1 ' r 1 r-' ii . , 1 ____ [ '. 2,-., '., --..,/-, \._;. i 1...j .'- . '7-* n , II Ii ' Ll ' ill ; , LIL ; ' I I I ' , , . 1 1.• L -' ,: L '-,-i.I- I- -21' 1;11 j '', 1.-' 1 i. 1 : '......._. • ! i ! ` 1 ' ' I 1 : 1 ! : , .14 i r , 1 1 1 i i k 1 '---\ : ' '',' ' !--- i i- ____i ''" --r-1 ' 1 I ' : . I.- --1----C..\'-.4. s',.. \--- .,!!!! 7-'.,!!, I\,. ,--•!!‘!,!!! , ' -,,..;;,,..!- -., ..!!„, i. ! --I I - ! 1 ! i , , !!., 't, i ! •i ..1 I ,. ‘. \ ! ! ! I , i . ' ..1•' : .!. , N n\ ,,, . I I-1, I ' I I L , .''- • -' I '''' ' ,,i' \*. ' t'l . •! ' " -_-!' ! . r._ ! ,/%'"! __ . i L--! 'CrT.;:ii•!!!%-!--2!!-- ,‘ ‘..1; --) \-----I--- ! :-T-4----------;4:117 ! '' ! ' i ..:,..:,;.;1..._ !,,,,,,,,,,,,,n , i 1: ! 1 1 ' Hi ! H f ' i I i ' . \-----, —1 ._A--' k. .„.1.. 1 1 , L 1 i L ; .1 .___.I._ L..L...., .__I__________.:1__f__LI/I. ;,:::_;.,i,,,.—i,__...---..._,:. ,< sAtn slw sea 111.4 II, . Hi H,;! ! IF t r 1 r ----1— I ___..; ..1 I ILI r• , , I -- [ 1 1 1 ' , -- -._ , ,_____ —_ I_ ...._,I i' 2 . :- ------', ..v. - 1._!----- , ' ' _ _I . 5, i ;I, 1 .!4 -- 1. "! -•l'[ _.,. _'''! -4-7-1 ---_-.17. 1, I. _I- 11 --- '1 - ! , P.M, P.M '• \14 1.', .i .1 1.---- ' ! Fin..._',,._! 1 .1 ---TT----I L --I .,. II-----1' ---- 1 , ; II-7 ! I . 1! 1 il i...?. I , 1 ! : : i . - I! 1 ! *-1 ----1 i t !--- 7- I r . i • , ,, ; i _ . __•!--- ..,..___I y...__ ,_ i ---H---1 1---.. — "i .-.17.7,771 1711.1.J.._. I ; ;__.,____I --•- III I __ , . L 1 : I . , fan S,. : ---"--- 51 r"- : •1 r , ' T_. , - I- 1 ii 1 , 11.__. !____11 1 ' - . i 1 — , I L 1 — '----.1' ._1.... i.._ __,... 1 h_i:._ i. i __I.L.1..,I 11.1•I 1" Parnal.1 801,,,,..IN -.-k, 1,_ .,, i• -1 i ;-' .. .Iti.' .--‘ -- ----'' i----1----19.----:'-------It 1 - -... '_,. ., \,..---\ , ! ! 7 - i 1'1' L, _.,IVLIV, ,, L___ 1 ; , • ' ! ! il --- `; 'X',----', -- ! . ; ! ! 11 ; 1 ) 1 ; ‘. -- " ( I ; ; ; ' ;-• i • , 1 ,--;,--•,. i.; !, ...., -' I - ---,,'-- i 1 _____, ____J , ,- 7-- - • : .. , -i , 1 I 11----I In. L- ; I 1 1 i ;-- IF , , , 'rill ...I i ;.--J ;-..-----1 Ir--- L 1 62.151W , 1, 1 ---F----.' I '' : :... tl_ . I . --...1. , •‘, \ ‘ .1--• ,________I F I. 11; lit It_____ . il- Ili t ! I ; ' • i _ , • '-< I I ti . , 1 , - I 1 ---t 1--., 1- <- I ;_. I . , ! I .!_i__,----1,;,r,„.„,,,-!--!-- 1-_,.1 I 1 I----1 ; -- • ! 1 - . , , 1 I, ! ,--,21111.4-..,I I 31---1 L,L- ,..,-----,--,"-----, -L.I " ' ; 1....1,-;,.. \L_I _ — - 1 t i ... 1 ----.1) ( L. I'-111I- --I --- ---I- ----II 1 I 11 l ) i 1 _ Edna,Henrmpin,MetroGIS I C VVSB F..Alsockik2o4.3, I in=450ft History of Recent Similar Subdivisions N ._, - Denied ..._ _.1 I W+E __ ......, [ I Approved —J S '../..\-..'e.ffil:t.' TheCinr of ( '''' i Withdrawn cc ej pi, 0, EDINA ...... / November 7,2017 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB&Associates I. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700& 73 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9. In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50- foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) I. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 2. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) 1/8(0 )0C1)1 DATE: November 3, 2017 TO: Cary Teague—Community Development Director CC: Chad Millner, PE— City Engineer FROM: Charlie Gerk, PE—Graduate Engineer RE: 6017 Walnut Drive— Preliminary Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject development for street and utility connections, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. Plans reviewed include "PRELIMINARY PLAT" dated October 2, 2017. General Comments I. No Comment Survey/ Plat 2. No Comment Traffic and Street 3. Application proposes relocation or modification of curb cut. Follow standards in curb cut permit application: https://www.edinamn.gov/366/Residential-Curb-Cut-Driveway-Entrance Sanitary and Water Utilities 4. Roadway was reconstructed in 2014, and is in new condition. A full width (curb to curb/ saw-cut to saw-cut) repair of Walnut Drive will be required when installing the new sanitary sewer and water service connections. This work will be completed per Edina Standard Plate 541. 5. SAC fees will need to be paid prior to building permits being issued. 6. Sewer connection charge and water connection charge will need to be paid prior to building permits being issued. Storm Water Utility 7. Applicant may review local drainage features at the following links: https://maps.barr.com/edina/ 8. Sump drain connection is available on Walnut Drive. 9. The subject sites front yard drains to subwatershed NMN_20. Drainage is through public storm sewer utility, capacity is available. 10. The subject sites rear yard also drains to subwatershed NMN_20. Drainage is through public storm sewer utility, capacity is available. II. No increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private properties for the 100-year Atlas 14 design storm. 12. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 _134A.at ,(45(G) yt-r), t Eli, Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control 13. An erosion and sediment control plan will be required for each lot developed at time of building permit. Other Agency Coordination 14. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit will be required for the subdivision and each individual site, along with other agency permits such as MNDH, MPCA and MCES. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 STAFF REPORT121 k.4> )7i1 • o •14yoo2POPf519• 1888 Date: November 15, 2017 To: Planning Commission From: Jessica V. Wilson,Water Resources Coordinator Subject: Draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Presentation for Review and Comment Information / Background: Staff is seeking review and comment of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. A copy of the draft plan is available on the City's website at www.EdinaMN.gov/WaterResources. A presentation will describe the background information, key elements, policy gaps, and issues for which staff are seeking direction. Staff are requesting oral comments from Planning Commission following the presentation; however, written comments may be submitted through November 27th to Jessica Wilson at jwilsoneedinamn.gov. Comments from the Energy and Environment Commission, City Council, neighboring cities, watershed districts, and the public will also be considered. An update to the City's 10-year local water plan, called the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, is a required component of the city-wide local comprehensive plan.Adoption of the local water plan is required within two years of local comprehensive plan adoption which must be completed before December 31, 2018. Although the local water plan is mandated by state statute, staff has elected to go beyond the minimum requirements to draft a plan that creates a space for meaningful change with regard to water resources management in Edina. The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan defines policies, identifies and prioritizes issue areas, and plans implementation activities around the services of flood protection, stormwater runoff management, and clean surface water for the next ten years. A copy of the draft Executive Summary is attached. City of Edina • 4801W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 1 .0 Executive Summary This plan provides the City of Edina with a Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (CWRMP). The plan was developed to address current and future stormwater issues, especially those related to future development and redevelopment. The plan addresses stormwater runoff management and flood control,water quality management, and wetlands protection through establishment of stormwater planning policies and recommendations. The City of Edina developed its first CWRMP in 2003. The original CWRMP is referenced throughout this document as the 2003 CWRMP. The CWRMP was then updated in 2011. This CWRMP is composed of Section 1.0: Executive Summary and 16 additional sections,which are described as follows: Section 2.0:Introduction and Physical Setting—presents background information regarding the City,general watershed information, and plan purposes. Section 3.0: Policies for Water Resources Management presents background information, goals, policies and design standards covering runoff management and flood control,water quality management, erosion and sediment control,wetlands,floodplain management, recreation, habitat and shoreland management, groundwater,the City's education goals,and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)considerations. Section 4.0: Methodology for Modeling—describes the data, methods and assumptions used for the stormwater analyses. Section 5.0 through Section 14.0: (Major Drainage Area Descriptions and Recommendations)—describes the general drainage area, drainage patterns within the area, the stormwater system analysis and results, and implementation recommendations for each of the following 10 major drainage areas in the City: Nine Mile Creek- North, Nine Mile Creek- Central, Nine Mile Creek- South, Lake Cornelia/Lake Edina/Adam's Hill, Nine Mile South Fork, Southwest Ponds,Trunk Highway(TH) 169 North, Northeast Minnehaha, Southeast Minnehaha,and Northwest Minnehaha. Section 15.0:Issues and Implementation Program—describes the significant components of the City's CWRMP implementation program, including its NPDES Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer(MS4) permit,specific requirements of the NMCWD and MCWD,financial considerations, ordinance implementation and official controls,and implementation priorities. Section 16.0:Wetlands—Discusses the wetland inventories completed for the City of Edina and the assessment methodologies and results. Section 17.0: References City of Edina 1-1 2017 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan 1.1 Problems, Issues, and Potential Solutions This section summarizes the City's 2018- 2027 water resources implementation program, and potential stormwater management improvements identified in Section 5.0 through Section 14.0 of the plan. 1.1.1 Water Resources Implementation Program This plan serves as a master plan for the City's water resources management and storm drainage system. The City will work with residents to implement structural (capital) improvements and non-structural programs to address existing water resource problems within the City and to prevent future problems from occurring.The implementation program identifies and prioritizes the programs and improvements, and provides cost estimates for budgeting purposes.Table 15.1 presents the City's water resource-related implementation program, which includes the City's non-structural (administration) programs and structural (capital) improvement program. 1.1.2 Runoff Management and Flood Control The hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analyses of the current stormwater system identified several areas throughout the City where the desired 1-percent-annual chance level of protection may not be provided. These problem areas and potential solutions are discussed in detail in Section 5.0 through Section 14.0 and are summarized and prioritized in Table 15.2. In addition to evaluating the level of protection provided by the current stormwater system,the level of service provided was also evaluated. From this analysis, it was determined that the storm sewer throughout many areas of the City is not currently providing the desired 10-year level of service.The areas where the storm sewer does not offer sufficient capacity and street flow occurs during a 10-percent-annual-chance event are depicted in figures in Section 5.0 through Section 14.0 .The capacity of these storm sewer systems should be evaluated and upgraded as opportunities arise. 1.2 Flood Risk Reduction Strategy As part of this 10-year plan,the City of Edina will develop a Flood Risk Reduction Strategy that outlines a plan for working toward reducing flood risk,where appropriate,and meeting its stormwater management goals for providing a 1-percent-annual-chance (100-year) level of protection where possible.The strategy will identify and characterize flood problems throughout the city and identify strategies and infrastructure improvements to address flood-prone areas.The strategy will include preparation of planning-level cost estimates to help understand the potential financial investment required to meet the City's flood protection goals and the anticipated timeframe for implementation. The Flood Risk Reduction Strategy will detail the City's approach to addressing flood-prone areas based on implementation categories described in Section 15.1.3.1. he Flood Risk Reduction Strategy will focus on identification and prioritization of flood reduction efforts. The City will seek to maximize cost effectiveness and capitalize on coinciding opportunities, such as planned street reconstruction, redevelopment,availability of land, and other planned infrastructure City of Edina 2 2017 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan improvement projects. Consideration will also be given to achieving additional "co-benefits", such as water quality improvements, open space expansion, and wildlife habitat improvement. The City recognizes that addressing regional and local flood issues throughout the community will require multiple strategies and many actions implemented over a generational time frame.The City will employ the strategies and associated actions summarized in Table 1.1 for addressing flood issues. Table 1.1 Strategies and Potential Actions for Addressing Local and Regional Flood Issues Strategies Potential Actions Plan,preserve and reclaim flood storage(new public and private stormwater plans,deeds,easements,open space) Maintain and increase green space Maintain and increase storage(ponds,underground chambers,streets, depressions) Protect flow paths and emergency overflows Modify the flood Manipulate timing of peak flow Divert water Control rate of peak flow Detain and slowly release flow Reuse water for beneficial purposes Employ Green Infrastructure(GI)and Low Impact Development(UD)standards Elevate structures Modify susceptibility Acquire at-risk properties Floodproof structures Enforce substantial improvement limits Elevate utilities Encourage flood insurance Reduce impacts Encourage preparedness planning Encourage resilient landscaping Provide risk audits Limit infiltration and inflow to the sanitary system Maintaining existing floodplain infrastructure 1.3 Clean Water Strategy As part of this 10-year plan,the City of Edina will develop a clean water implementation strategy that outlines a plan for working toward meeting its clean water goals.The strategy will address the City's approach to meeting the pollutant reduction targets identified through the TMDL and WRAPS process. The strategy will also determine pollutant load reduction targets for nondegradation of water bodies that are not impaired and identify an approach for achieving these stormwater management targets.The clean City of Edina 1-3 2017 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan water implementation strategy will be a 5-year strategy that identifies regular"good housekeeping" stormwater practices and clean water capital improvement projects(CIP)to achieve the goals,including quantification of pollutant removals and preparation of planning-level cost estimates.This information will be used for planning,as well as assessment of cost-benefit for project prioritization.The implementation strategy will be developed in coordination with street reconstruction projects, redevelopment, and other opportunities.Annual or biennial reporting will be included in the strategy to quantify movement toward the City's goals and track activities for the City's annual SWPPP and MS4 reporting. The Clean Water Strategy will define clean water goals,the cost and pace of achievement, and plan implementation opportunities based on implementation categories described in Section 15.2.3.1. Each of the clean water improvement opportunity categories identified above have opportunities for partnership with other entities,such as private land owners,watershed districts, non-profit organizations, or other local governmental entities. City of Edina 1-4 2017 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan 5. co a) u r +' E U E ° o E E m E N u ra w E E E c no 0 0 0 0 ° o ° o O o o 4-. Z O' U c N 'N -O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) O J @ a) cD y C 1� 00 O O Or 67 r0 Or = N 'C -o t s a 0 Q' U a) U 0 E E U Q U m LIJ c6 ca U ca E U O 0 U O J E C J U 3Lij U U C U Q tr) 6) O z O o 00 O O O r U vi a O r _c O Y L "O N U to r0 U U O d LO 00 CO O 00 O 00 c.„.:2 L() • o o o O O a E N r r r N r N r a) -a E E E E rn f0 O i co U O U U U C U at N OU _C -C _C _C - Q C m a • Q' U U U U U 7 U to o a a 0 a a C E f0 C U C C C C C C U 7 7 7 7 7 Or U = _ _ = C 0 " f6 C O N a C r r r r r Li Y y ) U U U U U CU U Z _ Q a a a 0 U) is 0 as Q H H H H H H U a r Z 0 r r r r r r r r r v. N U C O _o U is c6 � r r r r r r r E w C "O -0 (/) r r r r r r r 7 z U a7 o C J U U C U U U C 2 r r r r r r r r C C C C C C U �" r r r r r r C fn - - � - - - co C T-- r- r r r r 47+ (0 'N "N U "U, -N "U) E U z O r r = = = = = r r N C a E o F E 3 C C r r r r r r r ,-- r �- G W 0 U rU.. N a) a) c 4 Z r r r r r r r r r r vi • E C o E E E CO m — r r r r r r r r E c6 Z r r C C O C C C d r Q c r r r r r r r r r O O O u) o o O ,� o J C r r r r r r r r r r O I t L O .0 t "6 a U = C C (n C C Q C `) r r r r r r r r r O O O O O y U Q 3 E E o E E E N-- r r r .— r r U U U U U co r r r r r r r r Y d .L.J _ ,L„ ,L_„ o C @C E `) o C U Cr) U U U 7 13 0 ✓ r r r r r r r r a1 N -0 -O -O "O C CO E N r r ,- i--- r r r r r Y CU 7 7 7 7 C C CJ) cp LL O 0 _ _ _ _ ,n E C r r r r r r r r r .I-. r r r r r - C C U C U r r r r r 1-- r r •Vf CC UOQ, Cl.) UOQ UOT. Q C r r ,-- r r [- r r N 0 H H H H H H - -0 IT a) U' E a o = C 0 a) .2 C C 7 o r V) C 7 O• o) U a) a' C a+. Z 6O 7 C V1 4 - w N 0 L O0) ) N 0 V 0 ~ 3 3 0 a) 0) E 0 C Q a' C E .L .�6 C N " -a C m m N � O) N N 04• Z v Q C . H a' c� -c c = 0 1- a a , a, - cu 0 a. n o l7 > v) Y a) C v� CO C O ~ Q i (/) O -70 N tr. '-i--% U, C �, C' U, a; C Z U u CU v al c C E _ • - a o — N C U aCi O v a' ra C U v O CO a) a) 'o a) ca a Q >_ 1 0 J CO1 H v) Z m -, J CC Et -, CC 0 v) + 0)