Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-21 Meeting PacketAgenda Transportation Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Community Room Thursday, June 21, 2018 6:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 17, 2018 V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Travel Demand Management (TDM) Discussion B.CloverRide Circulator Update C.Dockless Bikeshare Update D.Draft 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan Projects E.Tra1c Safety Report of June 5, 2018 VII.Chair And Member Comments VIII.Sta6 Comments IX.Calendar Of Events A.Schedule of Meeting and Event Dates as of June 15, 2018 X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli9cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Liz Moore, Engineering Specialist Item Activity: Subject:Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of May 17, 2018 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the meeting minutes of the regular Edina Transportation Commission of May 17, 2018. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description DRAFT Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission May 17, 2018 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room May 17, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Richman called the meeting to order II. Roll Call Answering roll call were commissioners Ahler, Johnson, Kane, Ma, McCarthy, Olson, Richman, Ruthruff, Veluvali, Yeager Absent: Commissioners Scherer III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by commissioner Johnson and seconded by commissioner Ruthruff to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner McCarthy approving the March 15, 2018 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Circulator Bus Update Commissioner Olson presented updates on the circulator bus • No stops north of Hwy 62 • Kickoff is currently planned for June 15th Motion was made by commissioner Ruthruff and seconded by commissioner Kane approving the circulator bus route. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. Draft Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Heather Kienitz from SEH presented the updated Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy • Provide research on a raised crosswalk • Send out a summary of the presentation • Add “start here” on the flow chart Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Motion was made by commissioner McCarthy and seconded by commissioner Ahler approving the Draft Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy but add a note that the flow chart and table are to be used as a decision guide. All Voted Aye. Motion Carried. C. U of MN Capstone Report: York Avenue/Parklawn Avenue Intersection Improvements Director Millner presented the capstone report about the York Avenue/Parklawn intersection. D. Bicycle Safety Community Renewal Application Update Chair Richman provided an update on the status of the application. • Help from the commission is needed to complete the application sections on Education and Encouragement by June. o The Education section will be completed by commissioners Ma and Richman. Ma will complete the youth education and Richman will complete adult education o Volunteers are still needed for Encouragement. E. Traffic Safety Report of May 1, 2018 Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Johnson to the approve May 1st, 2018 Traffic Safety Report. All voted Aye, motion carried. F. Prepare for June 5 Joint Work Session with City Council • Commission will focus on the Work Plan, specifically, an update on the circulator bus and traffic demand management, they would also like to discuss future plans. VII. Chair And Member Comments • Commission Ahler said the communication from Lou Miranda was very interesting and would be interesting for France Ave in the Southdale Area • Commissioner Olson said the CloverRide logo isn’t necessarily “official” • Commissioner Ruthruff said the draft crossing policy should be in color • Commissioner Kane said we need to be proactive in finding solutions for transportation and not disturbing neighborhoods. • Commissioner Ma said that MPR had a story about how conditional, autonomous cars can be very dangerous if control is given back to the human in certain situations because they may not be paying attention. • Commissioner Veluvali said traffic is horrible in Edina and we need better access to public transportation. • Commissioner Johnson said his colleagues don’t feel Edina is very bicycle friendly and would like a better presence on the website about bicycle friendly events, maps, etc that are easily accessible to the public Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: • Commissioner Richman thanked everyone for coming to the comp plan update and the Southdale District Working Committee has invited the transportation commission to their transportation meeting on May 24, 2018 at 6:30PM VIII. Staff Comments • Dockless Bike Share (LimeBike) MOU was approved by council and will start in June • Staff is working on a joint transportation study with the school district and sent out a survey on May 11 to parents and students. The survey will close June 11. There will be an open house, Monday, June 25th on the traffic study and feedback is welcome from the neighborhoods. • May 24th, there will be two bid openings for Valley View and France sidewalks. • Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail grand opening is June 3rd at 10am • France Avenue bridge will be re-decked next year and will be closed for three months • Sidewalks by the hospital are being revisited to connect 66th Street to the bridge. • Tracy Avenue bridge is on the state’s capital improvement plan for a rebuild in 2024-2026 but they will mark sidewalks this year with pavement markings. IX. Adjournment at 8:16PM TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 5 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 4 80% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 3 100% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 3 100% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 100% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 4 80% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 5 100% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 2 80% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 3 100% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 3 60% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 3 60% Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Travel Demand Management (TDM) Discussion Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The Travel Demand Management (TDM) Committee of the ETC will present their proposal regarding the potential future of TDM in Edina. They will also update the commission on their discussion with City Council regarding the same topic at the June 5 joint work session. ATTACHMENTS: Description TDM Proposal to ETC ETC Presentation for Joint Work Session with Council Proposal for Developing a Traffic Demand Management (TDM) Program Background • As Edina grows, automobile traffic congestion is likely to increase, particularly in certain areas and at certain times of the day. • Many cities are implementing TDM, which is the application of services, incentives, and policies to reduce single occupancy vehicle travel demand, or to redistribute this demand in space or in time. • TDM best practices include: o consistent and coordinated application of TDM policies and programs across a region’s municipalities, o the close integration of land use and transportation planning processes, o the establishment of standardized performance measures, o a decentralized approach to the implementation of TDM strategies o the use of pricing and incentives, where appropriate, and o reliance on communication technologies to promote TDM, educate decisionmakers and the public, and provide actionable travel information. • TDM in Edina has already begun. o Commuter Services is the outreach program for the I-494 Corridor Commission. Edina is one of five member cities represented by this Commission (Edina City Council Member Mary Brindle and Transportation Planner Mark Nolan are voting members on the Commission). To date, Edina has not elected to implement financial incentives for developers as the other member cities have. o Developing a TDM strategy has been part of the 2008 Comp Plan and the ETC has proposed adding emphasis to this in the Comp Plan Update currently in development. Proposal Objectives: 1. Create an actionable set of options and metrics for the City to consider for TDM. 2. Begin the process of educating and engaging residents, consultants, and City leaders in the development of a TDM program. Process: 1. Develop a deeper understanding of TDM by the small area workgroups. 2. Solicit input from the small area workgroups and the Planning Commission on TDM strategies. 3. Educate residents and solicit input on TDM strategies. 4. Create a workgroup, sponsored by the ETC, to create a TDM framework and recommendations for a TDM program for Edina. This workgroup would include ETC Commissioner representatives, resident representatives, business and developer representatives, an I-494 Corridor Commission representative, a Planning Commission member, and ETC staff. The CITYofEDINAEdina City Council & Transportation CommissionJoint Work SessionJune 5, 2018 The CITYofEDINA2018 ETC Work Plan Progresswww.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINA2018 ETC Work Plan Progresswww.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINA•Through the current visioning and development planning process, many conversations have turned to the importance of the future of transportation in our city.•Therefore, it is a high priority to develop strategies to reduce Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) trips through the use of Traffic (Travel) Demand Management (TDM).www.EdinaMN.gov42019 ETC Work Plan Pre-Planning: Traffic Demand Management The CITYofEDINAWhat TDM Strategies Have Other Cities Used?•Promoting bicycle and pedestrian-oriented design elements.•Improving public transportation infrastructure.•Providing traveler information tools to promote non-SOV travel.•Requiring parking users to pay the full costs directly.•Requiring bicycle-friendly facilities and environments, including secure bike storage areas and showers.•Subsidizing non-SOV transit costs for employees or residents.•Adopting policies that embed TDM into the land development planning process. •Leveraging public and developer funding to increase the use of non-SOV travel options.www.EdinaMN.gov52019 ETC Work Plan Pre-Planning: Traffic Demand Management The CITYofEDINATDM in Edina has Already Begun•Edina is one of five cities in the I-494 Corridor Commission.•In 1992 Edina considered a TDM ordinance.•TDM planning was recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; strengthened and elevated in urgency in the current 2018 revision. •Several strategies are already being deployed.•Edina is the only city in the I-494 Commission that does not have a formal TDM program.www.EdinaMN.gov62019 ETC Work Plan Pre-Planning: Traffic Demand Management The CITYofEDINAResearch TDM best practices and options and develop a recommendation for approval and implementation. To include:•A working group to solicit broad input and promote a better understanding of traffic issues among residents.•Recommendation by the end of 2019 with metrics and an actionable set of options.Your thoughts, concerns, red flags…and your support!www.EdinaMN.gov7TDM in the 2019 ETC Work Plan Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:CloverRide Circulator Update Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Staff and Commissioner Olson will provide an update on the launch of the CloverRide circulator bus service, scheduled for Friday, June 22. For more information, visit the CloverRide web page at: EdinaMN.gov/CloverRide. Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Dockless Bikeshare Update Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Staff will update the Commission on the status of the dockless bikeshare launch (LimeBike) in Edina. Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Draft 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan Projects Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Every two years each City department updates the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) with projects that it proposes to construct/implement in the next five years. The attached is a draft list of transportation-related projects that the Engineering Department is proposing. Please note that these projects have been submitted but have not yet been approved. Staff considers several factors when proposing projects, including (but not limited to) pavement and utility condition, available funding, and recommendations in City-approved planning documents (e.g. the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan). Not all road reconstruction/improvement projects utilize P edestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Funds; the attached table indicates those that do. ATTACHMENTS: Description Table: Draft 5-Year CIP Transportation Projects Map: Anticipated Street Reconstruction Projects City of Edina Engineering Department DRAFT Five‐Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Transportation Projects Year Project PACS Fund Contribution / Notes Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Program 2019 Chowen Park A Beard Avenue sidewalk (W 58th St to W 60th St) 2019 Chowen Park B 2019 Indian Trails B 2019 Indian Trails C 2019 Todd Park E 2019 Indian Hills C 2020 Grandview A Hansen Road sidewalk (Grove St to W 56th St) W 56th Street sidewalk (Hansen Rd to Code Ave) 2020 Prospect Knolls A Shannon Drive sidewalk (Dewey Hill Rd to Kemrich Dr) 2021 Creek Knoll A Beard Avenue sidewalk (W 54th St to W 55th St) 2021 Creek Knoll B 2021 Melody Lake B Hansen Road sidewalk (Benton Ave to Grove St) 2021 Birchcrest C Hansen Road sidewalk (W 60th St to Benton Ave) 2022 Morningside D Miscellaneous sidewalk replacement 2022 Morningside E Miscellaneous sidewalk replacement Kemrich Drive sidewalk (Shannon Dr to Fleetwood Dr) Fleetwood Drive sidewalk (Kemrich Dr to Lanham Ln) Lanham Lane sidewalk (Fleetwood Dr to W 70th St) 2022 Prospect Knolls D 2023 Presidents B 2023 Morningside C 2023 Indian Trails A Municipal State Aid Reconstruction Program Shared use path (Wooddale Ave to France Ave) Sidewalk (France Ave to Xerxes Ave) Sidewalk (Spruce Ave to Lake Ridge Rd) Shared use path (at roundabout) Standard/buffered bike lanes (Spuce Rd to Scriver Rd) "Stand‐Alone" Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Projects 2019 Hilary Lane from Gleason Rd to Valley  View Rd ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2019 Tracy Avenue Shared Use Path Valley Ln to Highway 62 north ramps 2019 Highway 169 Frontage Road Shared  Use Path Braemar Blvd to Valley View Rd 2019 W 77th Street Sidewalk Parklawn Ave to new Twin Cities Orthopedic 2019‐ 2020 Valley View Road Sidewalk Phases 2  and 3 Upper Mark Terrace Dr to Lower Mark Terrace Dr 2020 Valley View Rd from 66th St to  France/70th St ‐Buffered Bike Lanes Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2022 Blake Road (w/ roundabout, Spruce  Rd to Scriver Rd) 2020 Melody Lake A 2022 Prospect Knolls C 2020 W 58th Street (Wooddale Ave to  Xerxes Ave) Page 1 City of Edina Engineering Department DRAFT Five‐Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Transportation Projects Year Project PACS Fund Contribution / Notes 2020 Gleason Rd from Valley View Rd to  Dewey Hill Rd ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2021 Valley Ln/Ridgeview Dr from Valley  View Rd to 66th Str ‐ Standard Bike  Lanes Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2021 Gleason Rd from Valley View Rd to 62  ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2021 Eden Ave from Vernon Ave to Arcadia  ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2022 Dewey Hill Rd from Cahill Rd to  Gleason Rd ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2022 McCauley Trail from Valley View Rd to  Gleason Rd ‐ Shared Use Path Combined with mill and overlay maintenance 2023 Olinger Boulevard Sidewalk Tracy Ave to Sun Rd (Active Routes to School recommendation) HRA / TIF Projects 2019 Wooddale Ave and Valley View Rd  Traffic Signal PACS pays sidewalk/ped ramp portion of project 2019 Vernon Ave Intersections  Improvements (Interlachen, Jerry's  access) 2019 Arcadia Avenue Improvements (Eden  Ave to Vernon Ave) 2020 District Parking Engagement Project  2021 Cornelia Elementary School Sidewalks Wooddale Ave, Andover Rd, Kellogg Ave & Claremore Dr (Active  Routes to School recommendation) Page 2 HWY 16978TH ST W VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD DEWEY HILL RD 76TH ST W 70TH ST WGLEASON RD58TH ST W 54TH ST W 50TH ST W 4 4T H S T W MALONEY AVE INTERLACHEN BLVD YORK AVE S66TH ST W 70TH ST W CAHILL RDXERXES AVE SFRANCE AVE SV E R N O N A V ESCHAEFER RDBLAKE RDGLE AS O N R D §¨¦169 §¨¦169 §¨¦62 §¨¦62 §¨¦100 §¨¦100 INTERLACHENCOUNTRYCLUB VANVALKENBURGPARK BREDESENPARK BRAEMAR PARKGOLF COURSE FRED RICHARDSGOLF COURSE EDINACOUNTRYCLUB D B I A A B L H B C D F A A B A B B B A A A A P I G D I J A E B C O A D B C D A A B F M A C B A C E B A A C B B A A C B B C B B C A B E D A B A D A A K A B C A A C B B D E A D B B G A C C E C C A F A F A C C D B D D D G D B D E C F B E C F C E C G C E D D F C C E B G B D D G E B E D C D C D C B C D C C F B E A D E C A D D E B H C D B N A D B F C A A B D C G B E G F E D CahillBraemar Hills Countryside Parkwood Knolls Southdale Concord Bredesen Park Lake Cornelia Indian Hills Highlands Dewey Hill Creek Valley Morningside Todd Park Birchcrest Pamela Park Grandview Presidents The Heights Lake Edina Fox Meadow Prospect Knolls Parklawn Golf Terrace Heights Melody Lake South Cornelia Chowen Park Interlachen Park Country Club Arden Park Normandale Park Indian Trails Promenade HilldaleRolling Green Pentagon Park Brookview Heights Minnehaha Woods Edinborough Strachauer Park White Oaks Sunny Slope Creek Knoll Centennial Lakes 50th and France City of EdinaAnticipated Roadway Reconstruction2018 - 2023 LegendAnticipated Year µEngineering Dept.March 2018 Neighborhood Maintenance Groups 2019 2020 2021 2022 The dates shown on the map represent the anticipated years of reconstruction and are subject to change based on budgetary issues, adjacent projects, and other factors.Not all bituminous roadways within the City are shown. If a road is not highlighted, then the potential reconstruction date is beyond the City’s 5-year planning process. The City of Edina’s street improvement policy is to assess residents for a portion of the roadway reconstruction costs. Public utility improvements are paid for from the City’s Utility Fund. Extensive evaluation regarding the condition of the pavement, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain is used to set the priority of roadway improvements. Note/Disclaimer 2018 2023 O/Users/engineering/Projects/_CONST/Pavement Mgmt/Anticipated Roadway Recon 2018-2023.pdf Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of June 5, 2018 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and recommend the Traffic Safety Report of Tuesday, June 5, 2018, be forwarded to City Council for approval. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. An overview of the comments from the Edina Transportation Commission will be included in the staff report provided to the City Council for their July 17, meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of June 5, 2018                 June 21, 2018 Edina Transportation Commission Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator  Traffic Safety Report of June 5, 2018 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 5. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Engineering Director, Public Works Director, Assistant City Planner and Transportation Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Traffic Safety Specialist and Police Lieutenant were not able to attend and were informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the June 21 Edina Transportation Commission and the July 17 City Council meeting agendas. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request to increase pedestrian safety at the intersection Interlachen Blvd and Vandervork Ave  Resident is concerned with vehicles not stopping for pedestrians in the crosswalk  Resident has cited a dangerous accident involving a pedestrian took place at this intersection in October 2015  Resident is requesting to add the in-street pedestrian crossing signage or even adding an extra pedestrian sign on the back of both signs currently at this crossing  ADT near this intersection is roughly 9500  85% speed is 33 mph  A 24-hour study found a total of 29 pedestrian crosses with a peak hour of 6 After review, staff recommends adding crosswalk signs to appear on both sides of the street in both directions to increase pedestrian awareness. Staff also recommends increasing the use of in-street (bollard) pedestrian crossing signs in this area. Map: Location of Interlachen and Vandervork  STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Request to add street name signs at the intersection of W 70th St and Metro Blvd  A concern was raised stating commuters unfamiliar with the area can’t find designated street signs  Current street signs are located on the south side of Metro in the median.  No street name signs are on any of the overhead traffic signals  This intersection is under Edina jurisdiction  Metro has a north/south approach into the intersection  W 70th enters the intersection from the west  The east approach at the intersection is a parking lot for a daycare center  ADT at this intersection is roughly 13,500 After review, staff recommends placing street name signs above current stop light mast- arms. By adding these signs, drivers should be more aware of the directions they are traveling. A3. Request to restrict on-street parking at the corner of W 48th St and Maple Rd  Resident is requesting to restrict parking near the intersection as it becomes dangerous when parking is utilized  Resident states when parking is utilized, it forces them to drive into the opposite lane which makes them fearful of getting into an accident  W 48th and Maple is a two-legged intersection going east and south  A driveway enters the northwest corner of the intersection  On-street parking is currently allowed on both sides of Maple and W 48th  The width near this curve is 25’  A large tree is located near the curve at the southeast corner After review, staff recommends restricting parking on the south-east (inner) corner of Maple Rd and W 48th St. Staff cites the new restriction will allow access for EMS vehicles. Allowing parking along the north-west portion of the intersection will help keep vehicle speeds low. Map: Location of W 70th and Metro Blvd  Photo: facing southbound, the street name sign is in  the circled area  Map: Location of W 48th and Maple  Photo: On W 48th facing west when on‐street parking is  utilized STAFF REPORT Page 3 Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request to add a movement prohibition sign on School Rd  Concord Elementary staff wants to add a sign on School Rd to restrict left turns for exiting vehicles at the east parking lot to alleviate traffic during peak school start and end times  The east parking lot allows parents to enter and pick up their children from Concord  Based on the layout of the this area, when exiting the parking lot, if a driver turns left towards Concord Ave, it would block further exiting vehicles or other westbound traffic on School Rd  The entrance to the east parking lot is measured at 60’ from Concord Ave After review, staff recommends adding no turn restriction sign adjacent to the entrance/exit. Staff recommends Concord Elementary remove the left turn marking on the parking lot driveway upon exiting onto School Rd, which should lower the number of vehicles attempting to turn left. B2. Request to add traffic signs on Interlachen Blvd   Resident is concerned with the level of safety on Interlachen and wishes for more traffic signs or all-way stop signs at cross streets  Interlachen has signs for; speed limits, dynamic speed signs, no parking, crosswalks, bike routes, bridge height advisory, share the road, horizontal alignment and traffic light signs  ADT on Interlachen varies between 8700 and 9500  85% speed varies between 33 and 38 mph After review, staff recommends placing no additional signs along Interlachen Blvd. Staff agrees no additional signs are warranted and overuse of signs can decrease the validity and motorist compliance of current signs. B3. Request for traffic calming on York Ave  A resident who lives on York Ave between W 56th and W 58th St is concerned with an apparent increase amount of traffic  ADT increased from 275 in 2012 to 325 in 2018  85% speed is 28 mph  This section of York is classified as a “Local Street”  On-street parking is allowed on both sides of York Ave  York Ave has a width of 32’ Map: Location of School Rd and Concord Elementary  Map: Length of Interlachen Blvd between Blake Rd and Vernon Ave. (Note: sign locations are shown on map)  Map: Location of York Ave where resident is requesting  traffic calming  STAFF REPORT Page 4 After review, staff recommends no changes as an overall increase of 50 ADT since 2012 is of little concern. Staff also believes the 85% speed is acceptable along a local street like York. B4. Request to add parking restrictions on Beard Ave, north of W 55th St  Resident at 3332 W 55th St is concerned with vehicles parking across Beard from his driveway (west side of Beard)  This section of Beard is 23’ wide  At the north end of Beard is a pedestrian path that crosses over Minnehaha Creek After review, staff recommends not placing a parking restriction along Beard Ave at this portion of Beard Ave. Staff cites the current road width gives adequate space for vehicles to exit from driveways. B5. Request to add stop signs at W 55th St and Brookview Ave  A resident is concerned with the level of safety and is requesting stop-controls  W 55th St is controlled with Yield signs  Brookview is uncontrolled  ADT on W 55th and Brookview was 172 and 225 respectively  85% speeds at W 55th and Brookview are 21.8 and 25.8 respectively  Three crashes have been reported at this intersection since June 2014  This request was reviewed in August 2014 and was recommended no changes After review, staff recommends no action. Staff agrees warrants are not met to place stop signs at this intersection. Staff decided to keep the yield signs in place as residents were not requesting them to be removed. Map: Location of Brookview and W 55th (note: yield  signs present as only traffic control)  Photo: Beard Ave from residents home  (note: the red line signifies the end of the driveway)  Photo: Beard Ave facing northbound (note: 3332 Beard  is on the right and the parking restriction request is  towards the left STAFF REPORT Page 5 B6. Request to improve intersection conditions at Interlachen Blvd and Schaefer Rd  Resident that lives at 6400 Interlachen is concerned with the lack of vehicles stopping at the intersection that is all-way stop controlled  The requestor is looking for physical changes, as opposed to police enforcement  The resident’s driveway enters the intersection on the north end of Interlachen  ADT at the section of Interlachen is 2480  85% speed is 27.2 mph  On June 1st, 2018, Public Works responded to a collision when a northbound vehicle on Schaefer failed to stop and hit an electrical box at the north east corner of the intersection After review, staff is recommending no changes as the outline of the concern is the perception of vehicles failing to stop at the stop signs. Staff is recommending increased police enforcement to raise driver awareness towards the importance of stopping at this intersection. B7. Request to add pedestrian signage at Chowen Park  Resident is concerned with pedestrian safety near Chowen Park and wants signage for drivers who “speed” past the park  ADT on W 57th and Chowen is 900 and 260, respectively  85% speed on W 57th and Chowen is 27 and 28 mph, respectively  Playground signs are placed to the north, south and west of Chowen Park  The intersection adjacent to the park is all- way stop controlled  No sidewalks or crosswalks are adjacent to Chowen Park After review, staff recommends no changes as playground signs are present in this neighborhood and the intersection adjacent to Chowen Park is all-way stop controlled. Staff also cites overall speeds in this area allow adequate stopping distances for any nearby pedestrians. Map: Location of Interlachen and Schaefer (note: 6400  Interlachen has a horse‐shoe shaped driveway north of  the intersection)  Map: Chowen Park located in the green area (note: the  three playground signs are circled)  STAFF REPORT Page 6 B8. Request to add two-way stop at W 65th & Tingdale and Josephine  Requestor is fearful of getting into a car crash with the current uncontrolled intersections  ADT on W 65th, Josephine and Tingdale is 70, 609 and 151 respectively  All streets are classified as local streets  No crashes have been reported at these locations in the last 10 years  No issues with sight lines at both intersections After review, staff recommends adding no stop signs at these locations. Staff cites the overall volume along with no reported crashes at these intersections, leads to stop signs being unwarranted. B9. Request to place all-way stops at Wilryan Ave & W 65th St  Requestor is concerned with the level of safety of this intersection and believes an all- way stop will help improve the area  Requestor believes the intersection has become more dangerous with the increase in vehicles trying to “cut-thru” instead of taking HWY 62 to HWY 100  ADT on W 65th and Wilryan is 70 and 685 respectively  Wilryan and W 65th are classified as local streets  Current intersection is all-way uncontrolled  No crashes have been reported at this intersection in the last 5 years  Current sight lines in all directions are acceptable After review, staff recommends no changes to this intersection. Staff agrees the volume from W 65th gives the intersection minimal opportunities for conflict and adding an unwarranted stop sign could lead to possible dangerous situations. Map: Location of the two intersections  Map: Location of W 65th and Wilryan  STAFF REPORT Page 7 Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study 1. Request for traffic calming along Maple Rd  Residents are concerned with the increase in vehicles and speeds during current construction at 50th & France  From 2015 to 2018 during construction near 50th & France ADT increased from 1200 to 1750  Current peak AM is 179 at 7:30 (148 southbound) and PM of 147 at 3:15 (90 southbound)  In the fall of 2017 westbound vehicles on W 50th are restricted from turning left onto France Ave from 4-7pm to prevent large backups  85% speed increased from 27.9 to 28.5 mph  Maple was reconstructed in 2003 and seal-coated in 2012  Parking is allowed on both sides of Maple  Maple is 29 feet wide  2 crashes have taken place on Maple between 49th and 50th St, one in 2015 and another in 2017  This was reviewed in February of 2018 and was recommended no action due to the construction near 50th & France being a temporary issue After review, staff recommends increased police patrol along Maple Rd with the intent to calm driver behaviors. Staff also recommends studying pedestrian use throughout Maple to analyze if crosswalks are warranted. Staff discussed other requests presented by residents along Maple including adding a turn restriction onto Maple and restructuring lane layouts along W 50th in an attempt to lower the traffic volumes in this neighborhood. Staff recommended such changes are not necessary as current construction along 50th & France is causing the increase in traffic to be a temporary issue. Map: Location of Maple Rd between W 49th and W 50th  STAFF REPORT Page 8 Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A resident contacted Traffic Safety concerned with the level of safety at crosswalks along W 70th St. Traffic safety contacted the EPD to request an increase in enforcement to improve driver behavior when pedestrians are crossing along W 70th St. D2. A resident contacted Traffic Safety requesting a crosswalk across W 66th St at Naomi Dr. This resident was concerned with pedestrians crossing this street to visit Normandale Park. This request is listed as a ‘D Item’ as this was reviewed and listed as ‘Item B6’ in the August 2015 Traffic Safety Report. D3. A resident contacted Traffic Safety to inform Edina a pedestrian crossing light at W 66th St and York Ave was not operating properly. Hennepin County maintenance was contacted thru traffic safety as this intersection’s traffic lights are controlled by the county and has been fixed. D4. A worker near W 50th & France requested temporary flashing lights to go with pedestrian signage during construction in this area. A temporary pedestrian flashing sign has been added to help raise pedestrian awareness for drivers during the construction. D5. A concern was raised that vehicles turning left (northbound) from Hazelton Ave onto York Ave are failing to yield to pedestrians crossing the north portion of the intersection over York. This location was looked at and noticed vehicles failing to yield to drivers first-hand. Traffic safety contacted the EPD to increase police enforcement to prevent drivers from failing to yield to crossing pedestrians. D6. A resident contacted traffic safety to request a double yellow marking to be painted at the southern curve of Browndale Ave. The resident has noticed vehicles appearing to cross-over the lane during the curve. Public Works was informed of this request. D7. A resident was concerned with the signal timing at the intersection of W 66th St and Valley View Rd. The City’s Electricians were informed of a timing issue and found a signal camera was not operating properly. The signal was fixed and the timing was changed to help improve the overall function of this intersection. STAFF REPORT Page 9 Appendix A: All-Way Stop Warrants Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection.                           STAFF REPORT Page 10 Appendix B: Stop Sign Warrants At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. Date: June 21, 2018 Agenda Item #: IX.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meeting and Event Dates as of June 15, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Upcoming Meetings/Dates/Events TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION SCHEDULE OF MEETING AND EVENT DATES AS OF JUNE 15, 2018 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Thursday Jun 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Jul 19 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Aug 16 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Sep 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM PUBLIC WORKS CONFERENCE ROOM Thursday Oct 25 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Nov 15 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Dec 20 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Jan 17 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Feb 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Mar 21 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM Thursday Apr 18 Regular ETC Meeting 6:00 PM COMMUNITY ROOM