Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 2018-054 Denying Comp Plan Pentagon Park South e ;. s RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54 RESOLUTION DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT-6 TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT— 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY PLAT, AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PENTAGON REVIVAL LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section I. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Pentagon Revival LLC and Chase Real Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of the Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77`h Street. All parcels combined, the site is 28.91 acres in size. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.03 A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development Plan was approved. 1.04 The use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time, however, the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this site with some residential uses to create a mixed use development. Residential uses are permitted under the current MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is four stories. 1.05 At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall density would be 52 units per acre. 1.06 The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86 acre portion of the site (4600-4660 77`h Street west), with a 365-unit market rate apartment and a 225-unit senior apartment (585 total units). 1.07 As proposed the development would require the following: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 80 units per acre; CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street•Edina,Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-927-8861 •Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54 Page 3 9. The proposal does not meet the City's criteria for PUD zoning, including a lack of mixed uses; no affordable housing in Phase I; no creative or efficient development of the site; lack of creative stormwater management; no podium height. 10. Lack of affordable housing within the project. 1 I. The current zoning, MDD-6 provides a reasonable use of the property and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 12. Allowing a residential use adjacent to an industrial land use (Seagate) could cause Seagate to be in violation of State regulations regarding noise standards. The decibel levels could exceed the requirements for manufacturing uses adjacent to residential uses. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54 Page 4 ATTEST: ebra A. Mangen, C' y Cfrri, es B. ovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2018• Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk i I i Exhibit A Address PTDs 4901,4815,4510,4530, 31-028-24-33-0010;31-028-24-33-0013; 4540,4550,4570,4600, j 31-028-24-33-0014;31-028-24-43-0003; 31-028-24-43-0004;31-028-24-43-0005; 4660,4820 West 77th r Street;7600 Parklawn 31-028-24-43-0006;31-028-24-43-0002; Avenue; 7710 Computer 31-028-24-43-0001;31-028-24-34-0009; I . 31-028-24-34-0008;31-028-24-34-0007; Avenue; Edina, MN 55435 31-028-24-33-0018;31-028-24-33-0015; 31-028-24-33-0012 Legal Description: PARCEL 1: All of the following described land: at point on the Those parts of Tracts A and B lying Southerly of the fallowing described line: Beginning e Sou West line of said Tract B distant 220 feet North othe East line 170 feet West of the thwest rNo Northeast co ner thereof thence thereof; thence y to a point on the North line of said Tract distant ne of said Tract A distant 40 feet North of the Southeast corner run Northeasterly to a point on thereof and there terminating. Tract C, i arts thereof lying Tracts E and F, except those pA di Northerly ant 0 feet North of the Sdescribed o ttheast corner thereof; Beginning at a point on the East line of Tract , 120 feet West and 32 feet South of the Northeast corner o thence run Northeasterly to a point distant f said I Easterly parallel with the North line of said Tract E for 30 feet; thdenScoe d fl Leto the left; Tract E,thence run Eas y pt- thence run fee ly at an angle of 90 degrees a0 Northeasutes Oseconds for terly lines of said Tracts E and F to its intersection with the parallel with the Northerly point on the Southwesterly line of Tract S distant 105 feet following described line: Beginning at a p along andthere termina St S ( hly line for 100 feedsouthwesterly tg� Ie)` thence run Southeasterly of the West line of saidTract i angles to said Southwesterly at right g So . et of the Southerly 300 feet thereof, Tract G, except the East 58 fe I North of the South 300 feet thereof; That part of Tract H, lying � All in Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ! PARCEL 2: Minnesota. Tracts F, G, H and I, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County, I PARCEL 3: Minnesota. Tracts A, B, C, D and E, Registered Land Survey No. 1218, Hennepin County, PAR CEL 4: • I Tract S, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Hennepin County, Minnesota PARCEL 5: The East 58 feet of the Southerly 300 feet of Tract G; The South 300 feet of Tract H, Registered Land Survey No. 1050, Hennepin Couhty, Minnesota.