Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-05-12 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAgenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota VIRTUAL MEETING Wednesday, May 12, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. To participate in Public Hearings: Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 2447027. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta8 member will introduce you when it is your turn. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Public Hearings A.CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Amendment - O)-Street Parking Regulations B.PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3 to PUD at 4040 70th Street West C.B-21-12: sign variances for monument sign height and size of allowable building signage at 7101 & 7201 Metro Boulevard D.PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat with Variances for 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard V.Reports/Recommendations A.Sketch Plan Review - 4911 77th Street West VI.Chair And Member Comments VII.Sta) Comments VIII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampli<c ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: May 12, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:C O NT I NUED P UBLI C HEAR I NG : Zoning O rdinanc e Amendment - O ff-S treet P arking R egulations Action, Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: T he P lanning Commission has options to proceed: 1. S uggest recommendations to staff for revisions to the O rdinance to be brought back to the P lanning C ommission at another meeting for consideration and vote. 2. Recommend the City Council hold a public hearing and approve the proposed draft ordinance with any recommended changes. I N TR O D U C TI O N: I n 2020, the Edina City Council requested that the P lanning Commission evaluate the appropriateness of the City’s O ff-Street P arking R egulations. T he City’s current regulations have not been revised since 1992. M any of the current standards have not been amended since 1970. O ver the past nine months the P lanning C ommission has been considering revisions to the off-street parking regulations. S taff has put together a table (see attached) that compares recent projects in E dina, to the current ordinance and proposed ordinance. It shows the number of parking spaces that the proposed ordinance would have required, compared to the current ordinance, and the number of stalls that were built or will be built. N ote that variances would not have been required in most instances, which demonstrates the ordinance is in line with what developers are building within their projects. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 5-6-21 Noon Draft Ordinance Staff Report Recent Edina Project Comparis on to the Draft Ordinance Comparison of Other Cities Parking Regulations Comparison of Cities Regulations - Les s us es , main areas of study Parking Regulations from Similar Cities Pres entation by Nels on Nygard Recommendations from Nelson Nygard Resident Recommendations on the Ordinance - Ross Plaetzer Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 22 April 2021 Public Hearing Comments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Parking Ordinance Amendments VISITORS 52 CONTRIBUTORS 26 RESPONSES 26 3 Registered 0 Unverified 23 Anonymous 3 Registered 0 Unverified 23 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:03:47 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:03:47 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name RuthAnn Metzger Q2.Address 5600 Dale Ave Q3.Comment Since we are in a pandemic right now, I think these changes are not needed. People are not using public transportation like before the pandemic & now crime is increasing to unacceptable rates. We should be focusing on making people feel safe instead of trying to reduce development costs when development is already out of control. People who are single seniors or who have kids in multiple activities are not going to give up their cars so making fewer parking places is just creating more problems. Who is looking at the big picture? Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:06:42 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:06:42 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Joshua Root Q2.Address 6721 Sioux Trl. Q3.Comment Edina was built in an era when car travel was an expected experience. Changes to the parking requirements without understanding the realities the city was built under will result in residents in the vast majority of the city losing access to the businesses and residents being built today. If we change the parking requirements then we need to actually capture the potential benefits of green space etc. to justify the determinant of the car dependent. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:15:50 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:15:50 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ann Swenson Q2.Address 6021 Concord ave Q3.Comment I have a friend who moved three years ago into the apartments next to Byerlys in the greater Southdale area. The complex has underground stalls but now charges for them. The two building complex has about 18 spots designated for its building outside.These are hardly ever available. Think Bank has a big “we will tow you “ sign along with the two retail lots that are connected to the apartment buildings. Byerlys also says their lot is only for customers. The front office of the apartment tells its renters if needing outdoor parking to park in the Macy’s home store lot. Their guest parking is more than inadequate and if Macy’s redevelops will be even worse. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 14:18:41 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 14:18:41 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sherry Hottinger Q2.Address 405 Harrison Ave S, Edina, MN Q3.Comment Reduced parking is all well and good, all reasons cited are valid reasons to consider. The reality however is that mass transit is abysmal and walking/biking is only an option for a limited part of our annual season. Walking and biking in winter, especially while shopping, can be difficult or impossible for many people. Inadequate parking forces cars further into neighborhoods which is also not desirable. I'm not going to fight for parking near my destination. I will shop elsewhere because for me it's the only way to do what I need to do. I will happily take transit if it was available, nearby, clean and safe. The demographics around younger generations are promising for reduced cars and environmental thoughtfulness, but to reduce parking without having the alternatives in place is not a great idea. If the city truly addresses these issues by creating transit which is workable for people by all means, reduce parking. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 16:16:02 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 16:16:02 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James L Wotipka Q2.Address 7710 Gleason Road Q3.Comment This sounds like another attempt to force people out of their cars. We do not need to win the title for most bicycle metro in the country. Our weather does not allow for practical use of bicycles all year long. As far as public transportation goes, getting to a bus requires long walks which are certainly not safe in our winters. If a residential development has x number of units than at a minimum it should have x number of parking spaces. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 17:05:15 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 17:05:15 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name mary everett Q2.Address 5600 park place Q3.Comment The reality is: we live in MINNESOTA, we have a hard WINTER, we do NOT choose to take a bus or taxi, we pay HUGE property taxes and want to have 2-3 cars. We have children that have sports activities ALL over the cities and we are not putting our 5-18 year olds on a bus. What is with all these appointed liberals with these CRAZy ideas. We want cars, we want to drive. I feel as though the people with this agenda are appointed people, not people that are current residents or elected people? Maybe I am wrong and out of touch?. I don't know who comes up with these ideas but I believe that most residents, who have children as well as those of us that are older, have no interest in public transportation for our everyday transportation. Although it is great to walk to 50th and France I need my car and always will. I think Edina really needs to start listening to the people that live here, not appointed reps from outside our city. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 04:44:59 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 04:44:59 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ann Makres Q2.Address 4912 69th Street Q3.Comment We should not reduce the number of parking spaces required for projects. There must be a minimum of 1 parking space per unit and a percentage ( the larger units) must be be required to allow two spaces Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 09:29:32 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 09:29:32 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Aimee Makres Q2.Address 6450 York Ave S, #314 Edina, MN 65435 Q3.Comment I think there should be 2 spots for each livable unit built. In my condo there is only 1 parking spot per unit, yet two people live in a unit and each person has a car. There is not enough parking for everyone in my building and many use the adjacent office buildings parking lot. It takes 2 incomes to live in these condo buildings in Edina and we need 1 parking spot for each person. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 11:30:16 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 11:30:16 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mary Landberg Q2.Address 5408 Creek View Lane Q3.Comment Changing to less parking required by builders will result in more parking on the street. I don't think this is a good idea. Look at the newest completed buildings. There is less space on the street no place for delivery trucks, trash removal trucks, etc. to park while they're completing their tasks. Bad, bad idea. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 21, 2021 10:21:39 am Last Seen:Mar 21, 2021 10:21:39 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Liberta Ledder Q2.Address 6709 Cheyenne Trail Q3.Comment The city has moved to increase density over the past 15 years. We are now at a point of being overcrowded. Reducing parking would only exasperate the problems we have in the city with too much traffic, no availability parking, and high if not out of control density. Please do NOT change our parking ordinances. Please listen to the people of this community and not the developers. We pay your salary and are not happy with the growth we have seen. PLEASE LISTEN!!!! Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 21, 2021 11:33:15 am Last Seen:Mar 21, 2021 11:33:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Heather Tietz Q2.Address 6404 Glacier Place Q3.Comment Would expect the City to NOT allow changes that would drive increased street parking in residential neighborhoods. A huge part of the quality of life of a neighborhood is whether kids/families can safely bike and participate in other outdoor activities. High level of on-street parking makes those activities less safe. Parking requirements in higher density or commercial areas impact what a buyer (housing or commercial) is willing to pay which ultimately impacts long term tax revenues from the property. Hope the City factors that into the analysis; otherwise, may have short term gain and long term pain. Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 23, 2021 14:08:17 pm Last Seen:Mar 23, 2021 14:08:17 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lucia Copland Q2.Address 4805 Hibiscus Ave, Edina MN 55435 Q3.Comment I am not in favor or reducing minimum parking requirements, for the following reasons: Winter weather makes commuting by any other than motorized transportation (a) extremely difficult and (b) unlikely to occur. Winter weather is a likelihood for this area at least 5 months of the year, if not 6. Reduced parking hurts the disabled and the elderly disproportionately. Many seniors travel only by car for health reasons while not qualifying for handicapped parking spaces (for example, because of lowered immunity, back aches, high blood pressure). Edina should be a handicapped and senior citizen friendly community. COVID-19 has shown us the negative consequences of increasing the numbers of people who use public transportation. Pandemics are not going to end after this one. Reduced parking benefits developers FAR more than the community. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 24, 2021 07:03:06 am Last Seen:Mar 24, 2021 07:03:06 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kirk Aadalen Q2.Address 4800 Hilltop Lane Q3.Comment I am against reducing the number of parking spots required for new construction projects. There will be people that own cars moving into these new condos and apartments. Those cars need to go somewhere. Please do not lower the required number of spots for new commercial/residential projects in Edina. Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 10:56:07 am Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 10:56:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sandy Simmons Q2.Address 5038 Bruce Place Q3.Comment Reducing the number of minimum parking spots going forward sounds very 'green' but in fact completely ignores reality. We live in a winter climate with snow, rain, ice. People are not going to bike in the winter. Parents aren't going to carpool on bikes. Couples don't go out for dinner on bikes. Handicaps and age make biking difficult. Cars are here to stay and with increasing population and density, decreasing space for cars makes no sense at all. Our community is 'locked in' to its existing space. With the city continually approving increased density it needs to recognize decreasing parking will effect everyone's quality of life in Edina. Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 13:42:48 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 13:42:48 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Dorothy Lodahl Q2.Address 5201 Richwood Drive Q3.Comment The premise to encourage walking, mass transit is fine - but mobility and age issues can prohibit using these amenities. If there are not enough parking spaces available - where will people park? In the street and during the winter plowing - I lived in Minneapolis for many many years - I appreciate the clear roads. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 14:06:01 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 14:06:01 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kevin Newman Q2.Address 7408 Shannon Drive Q3.Comment I am against reducing the concept or proposal to reduce the minimum parking requirements. I believe the number of parking spots should at a minimum of two parking spot per unit. The city posting lists the “benefits” of reducing the minimum parking requirements, but the downside includes • Less desirable living units. o In today’s world, most families, especially those looking for affordable housing, have two working individuals. In most cases, they need two vehicles to get to work. • Crowded street parking with the overflow of tenant vehicles. • An increased risk of auto vandalism or theft. o The TWC is seeing a record number of car and catalytic converter theft. Local news recommends parking your car in a garage of secure lot. Specific to parking requirements, developers should build units based on today’s consumer wants and needs, not projected trends that rarely come true. If the trends come true and everyone takes mass transit in the future, parking lots can be redeveloped into green space. Respondent No:17 Login:Lynn Hechanova Email:Lhechanova@comcast.net Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 16:12:06 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 22:58:26 pm IP Address:66.182.125.93 Q1.First and Last Name Lynn Hechanova Q2.Address 5601 Dewey Hill Road #302 Q3.Comment Setting a maximum number of parking spots for residential units at 1.5 is overreacting. Many senior couples who would like to downsize their single family home, or who have a second home, still both drive. They may both still be working. Limiting their option to have 2 parking spots available discourages them from giving up their single family home making less room for younger families to move into Edina. We would not have considered moving from our single family home in Edina to a condominium that didn’t have 2 spaces available and we are in a designated senior condo in Edina. Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 26, 2021 18:40:14 pm Last Seen:Mar 26, 2021 18:40:14 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bill Noonan Q2.Address 6204 Chowen Ave S Q3.Comment I’m not in favor of reducing the number of parking stalls for buildings. Look at density housing in Minneapolis and you’ll notice that people park in the streets, a real mess in the winter. Mpls has had bike lanes for many years and they’re hardly used between October and April. Sure, a few diehards use bikes all year. Edina already created a two messes. One mess is the building on France where Stripes and others share a dinky parking lot, and a parking ramp with a very steep access. Another mess is the new apartment or condo complex that faces the post office on 49th. I don’t know why anyone would want to rent a condo/apartment that looks at a parking ramp facing north that may have one week of sunshine in a year. I think it is a mistake to allow a structure like this so we get more tax revenue. The idea that someone from out of state would come here to tell us about national trends in parking is a waste of time and money. Does the person lives in our latitude, a very severe cold climate with snow and ice for six months each year? The City of Edina is trying to be a leader in green space, vehicle emissions, narrowed streets, reduced speed limits, and seems to push theory’s that in 40 years everyone will be driving tiny electric cars, riding bicycles, taking busses, and walking to small neighborhood stores, recycling food scraps, etc. Some people may like this life style, but I for one don’t want it forced upon me. I also don’t think we should spend our tax revenue trying to convince people like me that this is the right plan. Respondent No:19 Login:lewi0392 Email:lewi0392@gmail.com Responded At:Mar 27, 2021 14:54:14 pm Last Seen:Mar 27, 2021 21:29:01 pm IP Address:74.81.184.6 Q1.First and Last Name Andrew Lewis Q2.Address 6117 St Johns Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment This is a timely and worthwhile effort on the part of the city to reconsider parking in the context of climate change, transportation patterns, and current development trends. Mandating parking when market forces do not demand it drives up the cost of housing and business development in a time in which both are acute issues. I support these efforts and hope that the project team can come up with an approach that considers the costs and benefits of parking more equally than they have been to this point. Respondent No:20 Login:modern dad Email:tcarlson@carlsonpartnersllc. com Responded At:Apr 06, 2021 07:23:17 am Last Seen:Apr 06, 2021 12:46:16 pm IP Address:66.41.86.71 Q1.First and Last Name Ted Carlson Q2.Address 5516 Knoll Drive Q3.Comment As a 20 year resident and local developer, I am excited that Edina is updating a code that is 50 years old. Focus on transit, ride-share, bikes and pedestrians is very important! Let's figure out how to get rid of huge parking lots that are misaligned with market demands. Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 10, 2021 12:39:40 pm Last Seen:Apr 10, 2021 12:39:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chris Brown Q2.Address 4504 West 70th Street Q3.Comment This is definitely a step in the right direction! Unfortunately, this feels like a small step instead of broader change. Especially if we hope to create meaningful change regarding how residents, employees, and visitors travel throughout Edina. The E Line, Green Line extension, and improved bike/ped connections, as well as more mixed-use and dense development planned for parts of the City could all create significant opportunity for parking space reductions. I urge you to consider going further with this in mind. I'm not advocating for removing minimums altogether (at least not right now), but continuing to require 1:1 minimum ratios coupled with minor increases in square footage requirements feels like this opportunity is missing the mark. Edina is not an exurb. It's a first ring suburb with significant built environment benefits that provide a foundation for greater mode shift away from single family vehicles. Key items for your consideration: Sec 1.b: 1.25 space min. for multi-family housing, especially when most of that will be in transit-served areas seems unnecessarily high. Could we consider a 1:1 at the very least? Sec 1.g: Why require two spaces per classroom when students cannot drive anyway? I understand parent or volunteer activities but as an advocate for safe routes to school, let's think bigger. Sec 1.h, k, m, and v: All of these have minimal increases in square footage. Can't we do more? I'm not a parking expert but increasing by 50 sq ft seems paltry. Sec 1.w: This is probably the biggest disappointment. 1:1 for a mixed-use development when this development is likely located near the most desirable multimodal connections? Couldn't we at least try 0.8 minimum and 1.25 maximum? Do we really need three spaces for every two units? I've parked in the Westin's parking garage and it's an excellent example of wasted space (and money). Sec 2 (all): Three of the four PCDs will be served by the E Line. All of these represent the greatest opportunity for Edina to aggressively promote mode shift away from SOVs. In addition to reducing the minimum, these areas would be great locations to promote affordable housing via reduced parking costs. Sec 3: Could a provision to promote affordable housing be included? This policy seems like an excellent opportunity to provide developers with the tools to incentivize inclusion of affordable dwelling units within a broader project or fully- affordable buildings. There are examples of other municipalities using parking policy to accomplish this, so I strongly recommend your review and consideration. We are in the midst of an affordable housing crisis and as a City with many food service, retail, and other traditionally low-wage industries, wouldn't it be great to have these workers have at least the option to live closer to where they work? Parking costs a lot to build, and that cost usually ends up raising tenant rents. $5,000: Cost per surface space $25,000: Cost per above-ground garage space $35,000: Cost per below-ground garage space $142: The typical cost renters pay per month for parking +17%: Additional cost of a unit's rent attributed to parking Thank you for your consideration of my comments! I'm pleased to see the City considering this step in the right direction but I know we can do more! Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 13, 2021 07:30:00 am Last Seen:Apr 13, 2021 07:30:00 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name your mom Q2.Address your mom Q3.Comment your mom Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 13, 2021 07:33:28 am Last Seen:Apr 13, 2021 07:33:28 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Your mom Q2.Address The DEEZ NUTS Rood Q3.Comment its free real estate Respondent No:24 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 15, 2021 06:55:42 am Last Seen:Apr 15, 2021 06:55:42 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Thomas Hoegh Q2.Address 4407 Grimes Ave. S Q3.Comment "If you don't build it, they will still come." - this should be the city's motto regarding parking. The city's 'logic' to reduce parking is reductive. In other words, there is a desire to reduce parking space so they spin explanations and scavenge for data to support that position. This is really, really sad that idealogues are driving public policy. Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 12:43:53 pm Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 12:43:53 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mic O’Brien Q2.Address 4052 Sunnyside Rd Q3.Comment This sure feels to me like a developer who knowingly built his new building (The Lorient) with insufficient parking, with the knowledge that he would eventually get his way. His subsequent variance request was (somewhat, surprisingly) turned down; however, his new angle is to just get the rules changed. That way, he gets the rent from the large restaurant that he always planned on, the city gets the tax revenue and the surrounding neighborhood takes the brunt of the street-parked cars. Some of my neighbors warned me that this was inevitable — they’ve given up the fight. I guess the city & developer “win”? Respondent No:26 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 22, 2021 09:45:57 am Last Seen:Apr 22, 2021 09:45:57 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Roberta Castellano Q2.Address 4854 France Ave S Q3.Comment I object to any plan that will increase the likelihood of commercial district parking spilling out into the surrounding neighborhoods, reducing the neighbors’ quality of life, and fundamentally and detrimentally altering the character of the surrounding neighborhoods, while simultaneously reducing developers’ required investments into projects. This plan appears to be consistent with City efforts to expand commercial areas into surrounding neighborhoods. At 50th & France, it was discovered during the 50th & France Small Area Planning, that the City had been intending to utilize Eminent Domain, and the City was subsequently found to have inserted into the 50th & France Small Area Plan, an extortion scheme to extract property holdings from Maple Road neighbors, in order to further enable Lunds to redevelop the US Bank site to a greater extent than otherwise possible. This was in addition to multiple underhanded attempts to increase the permitted housing unit density within the district. Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 06 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Parking Ordinance Amendments VISITORS 58 CONTRIBUTORS 26 RESPONSES 26 3 Registered 0 Unverified 23 Anonymous 3 Registered 0 Unverified 23 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:03:47 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:03:47 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name RuthAnn Metzger Q2.Address 5600 Dale Ave Q3.Comment Since we are in a pandemic right now, I think these changes are not needed. People are not using public transportation like before the pandemic & now crime is increasing to unacceptable rates. We should be focusing on making people feel safe instead of trying to reduce development costs when development is already out of control. People who are single seniors or who have kids in multiple activities are not going to give up their cars so making fewer parking places is just creating more problems. Who is looking at the big picture? Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:06:42 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:06:42 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Joshua Root Q2.Address 6721 Sioux Trl. Q3.Comment Edina was built in an era when car travel was an expected experience. Changes to the parking requirements without understanding the realities the city was built under will result in residents in the vast majority of the city losing access to the businesses and residents being built today. If we change the parking requirements then we need to actually capture the potential benefits of green space etc. to justify the determinant of the car dependent. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 13:15:50 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 13:15:50 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ann Swenson Q2.Address 6021 Concord ave Q3.Comment I have a friend who moved three years ago into the apartments next to Byerlys in the greater Southdale area. The complex has underground stalls but now charges for them. The two building complex has about 18 spots designated for its building outside.These are hardly ever available. Think Bank has a big “we will tow you “ sign along with the two retail lots that are connected to the apartment buildings. Byerlys also says their lot is only for customers. The front office of the apartment tells its renters if needing outdoor parking to park in the Macy’s home store lot. Their guest parking is more than inadequate and if Macy’s redevelops will be even worse. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 14:18:41 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 14:18:41 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sherry Hottinger Q2.Address 405 Harrison Ave S, Edina, MN Q3.Comment Reduced parking is all well and good, all reasons cited are valid reasons to consider. The reality however is that mass transit is abysmal and walking/biking is only an option for a limited part of our annual season. Walking and biking in winter, especially while shopping, can be difficult or impossible for many people. Inadequate parking forces cars further into neighborhoods which is also not desirable. I'm not going to fight for parking near my destination. I will shop elsewhere because for me it's the only way to do what I need to do. I will happily take transit if it was available, nearby, clean and safe. The demographics around younger generations are promising for reduced cars and environmental thoughtfulness, but to reduce parking without having the alternatives in place is not a great idea. If the city truly addresses these issues by creating transit which is workable for people by all means, reduce parking. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 16:16:02 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 16:16:02 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James L Wotipka Q2.Address 7710 Gleason Road Q3.Comment This sounds like another attempt to force people out of their cars. We do not need to win the title for most bicycle metro in the country. Our weather does not allow for practical use of bicycles all year long. As far as public transportation goes, getting to a bus requires long walks which are certainly not safe in our winters. If a residential development has x number of units than at a minimum it should have x number of parking spaces. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 19, 2021 17:05:15 pm Last Seen:Mar 19, 2021 17:05:15 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name mary everett Q2.Address 5600 park place Q3.Comment The reality is: we live in MINNESOTA, we have a hard WINTER, we do NOT choose to take a bus or taxi, we pay HUGE property taxes and want to have 2-3 cars. We have children that have sports activities ALL over the cities and we are not putting our 5-18 year olds on a bus. What is with all these appointed liberals with these CRAZy ideas. We want cars, we want to drive. I feel as though the people with this agenda are appointed people, not people that are current residents or elected people? Maybe I am wrong and out of touch?. I don't know who comes up with these ideas but I believe that most residents, who have children as well as those of us that are older, have no interest in public transportation for our everyday transportation. Although it is great to walk to 50th and France I need my car and always will. I think Edina really needs to start listening to the people that live here, not appointed reps from outside our city. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 04:44:59 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 04:44:59 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ann Makres Q2.Address 4912 69th Street Q3.Comment We should not reduce the number of parking spaces required for projects. There must be a minimum of 1 parking space per unit and a percentage ( the larger units) must be be required to allow two spaces Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 09:29:32 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 09:29:32 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Aimee Makres Q2.Address 6450 York Ave S, #314 Edina, MN 65435 Q3.Comment I think there should be 2 spots for each livable unit built. In my condo there is only 1 parking spot per unit, yet two people live in a unit and each person has a car. There is not enough parking for everyone in my building and many use the adjacent office buildings parking lot. It takes 2 incomes to live in these condo buildings in Edina and we need 1 parking spot for each person. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 20, 2021 11:30:16 am Last Seen:Mar 20, 2021 11:30:16 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mary Landberg Q2.Address 5408 Creek View Lane Q3.Comment Changing to less parking required by builders will result in more parking on the street. I don't think this is a good idea. Look at the newest completed buildings. There is less space on the street no place for delivery trucks, trash removal trucks, etc. to park while they're completing their tasks. Bad, bad idea. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 21, 2021 10:21:39 am Last Seen:Mar 21, 2021 10:21:39 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Liberta Ledder Q2.Address 6709 Cheyenne Trail Q3.Comment The city has moved to increase density over the past 15 years. We are now at a point of being overcrowded. Reducing parking would only exasperate the problems we have in the city with too much traffic, no availability parking, and high if not out of control density. Please do NOT change our parking ordinances. Please listen to the people of this community and not the developers. We pay your salary and are not happy with the growth we have seen. PLEASE LISTEN!!!! Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 21, 2021 11:33:15 am Last Seen:Mar 21, 2021 11:33:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Heather Tietz Q2.Address 6404 Glacier Place Q3.Comment Would expect the City to NOT allow changes that would drive increased street parking in residential neighborhoods. A huge part of the quality of life of a neighborhood is whether kids/families can safely bike and participate in other outdoor activities. High level of on-street parking makes those activities less safe. Parking requirements in higher density or commercial areas impact what a buyer (housing or commercial) is willing to pay which ultimately impacts long term tax revenues from the property. Hope the City factors that into the analysis; otherwise, may have short term gain and long term pain. Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 23, 2021 14:08:17 pm Last Seen:Mar 23, 2021 14:08:17 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lucia Copland Q2.Address 4805 Hibiscus Ave, Edina MN 55435 Q3.Comment I am not in favor or reducing minimum parking requirements, for the following reasons: Winter weather makes commuting by any other than motorized transportation (a) extremely difficult and (b) unlikely to occur. Winter weather is a likelihood for this area at least 5 months of the year, if not 6. Reduced parking hurts the disabled and the elderly disproportionately. Many seniors travel only by car for health reasons while not qualifying for handicapped parking spaces (for example, because of lowered immunity, back aches, high blood pressure). Edina should be a handicapped and senior citizen friendly community. COVID-19 has shown us the negative consequences of increasing the numbers of people who use public transportation. Pandemics are not going to end after this one. Reduced parking benefits developers FAR more than the community. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 24, 2021 07:03:06 am Last Seen:Mar 24, 2021 07:03:06 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kirk Aadalen Q2.Address 4800 Hilltop Lane Q3.Comment I am against reducing the number of parking spots required for new construction projects. There will be people that own cars moving into these new condos and apartments. Those cars need to go somewhere. Please do not lower the required number of spots for new commercial/residential projects in Edina. Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 10:56:07 am Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 10:56:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sandy Simmons Q2.Address 5038 Bruce Place Q3.Comment Reducing the number of minimum parking spots going forward sounds very 'green' but in fact completely ignores reality. We live in a winter climate with snow, rain, ice. People are not going to bike in the winter. Parents aren't going to carpool on bikes. Couples don't go out for dinner on bikes. Handicaps and age make biking difficult. Cars are here to stay and with increasing population and density, decreasing space for cars makes no sense at all. Our community is 'locked in' to its existing space. With the city continually approving increased density it needs to recognize decreasing parking will effect everyone's quality of life in Edina. Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 13:42:48 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 13:42:48 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Dorothy Lodahl Q2.Address 5201 Richwood Drive Q3.Comment The premise to encourage walking, mass transit is fine - but mobility and age issues can prohibit using these amenities. If there are not enough parking spaces available - where will people park? In the street and during the winter plowing - I lived in Minneapolis for many many years - I appreciate the clear roads. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 14:06:01 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 14:06:01 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kevin Newman Q2.Address 7408 Shannon Drive Q3.Comment I am against reducing the concept or proposal to reduce the minimum parking requirements. I believe the number of parking spots should at a minimum of two parking spot per unit. The city posting lists the “benefits” of reducing the minimum parking requirements, but the downside includes • Less desirable living units. o In today’s world, most families, especially those looking for affordable housing, have two working individuals. In most cases, they need two vehicles to get to work. • Crowded street parking with the overflow of tenant vehicles. • An increased risk of auto vandalism or theft. o The TWC is seeing a record number of car and catalytic converter theft. Local news recommends parking your car in a garage of secure lot. Specific to parking requirements, developers should build units based on today’s consumer wants and needs, not projected trends that rarely come true. If the trends come true and everyone takes mass transit in the future, parking lots can be redeveloped into green space. Respondent No:17 Login:Lynn Hechanova Email:Lhechanova@comcast.net Responded At:Mar 25, 2021 16:12:06 pm Last Seen:Mar 25, 2021 22:58:26 pm IP Address:66.182.125.93 Q1.First and Last Name Lynn Hechanova Q2.Address 5601 Dewey Hill Road #302 Q3.Comment Setting a maximum number of parking spots for residential units at 1.5 is overreacting. Many senior couples who would like to downsize their single family home, or who have a second home, still both drive. They may both still be working. Limiting their option to have 2 parking spots available discourages them from giving up their single family home making less room for younger families to move into Edina. We would not have considered moving from our single family home in Edina to a condominium that didn’t have 2 spaces available and we are in a designated senior condo in Edina. Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Mar 26, 2021 18:40:14 pm Last Seen:Mar 26, 2021 18:40:14 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Bill Noonan Q2.Address 6204 Chowen Ave S Q3.Comment I’m not in favor of reducing the number of parking stalls for buildings. Look at density housing in Minneapolis and you’ll notice that people park in the streets, a real mess in the winter. Mpls has had bike lanes for many years and they’re hardly used between October and April. Sure, a few diehards use bikes all year. Edina already created a two messes. One mess is the building on France where Stripes and others share a dinky parking lot, and a parking ramp with a very steep access. Another mess is the new apartment or condo complex that faces the post office on 49th. I don’t know why anyone would want to rent a condo/apartment that looks at a parking ramp facing north that may have one week of sunshine in a year. I think it is a mistake to allow a structure like this so we get more tax revenue. The idea that someone from out of state would come here to tell us about national trends in parking is a waste of time and money. Does the person lives in our latitude, a very severe cold climate with snow and ice for six months each year? The City of Edina is trying to be a leader in green space, vehicle emissions, narrowed streets, reduced speed limits, and seems to push theory’s that in 40 years everyone will be driving tiny electric cars, riding bicycles, taking busses, and walking to small neighborhood stores, recycling food scraps, etc. Some people may like this life style, but I for one don’t want it forced upon me. I also don’t think we should spend our tax revenue trying to convince people like me that this is the right plan. Respondent No:19 Login:lewi0392 Email:lewi0392@gmail.com Responded At:Mar 27, 2021 14:54:14 pm Last Seen:Mar 27, 2021 21:29:01 pm IP Address:74.81.184.6 Q1.First and Last Name Andrew Lewis Q2.Address 6117 St Johns Ave, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment This is a timely and worthwhile effort on the part of the city to reconsider parking in the context of climate change, transportation patterns, and current development trends. Mandating parking when market forces do not demand it drives up the cost of housing and business development in a time in which both are acute issues. I support these efforts and hope that the project team can come up with an approach that considers the costs and benefits of parking more equally than they have been to this point. Respondent No:20 Login:modern dad Email:tcarlson@carlsonpartnersllc. com Responded At:Apr 06, 2021 07:23:17 am Last Seen:Apr 06, 2021 12:46:16 pm IP Address:66.41.86.71 Q1.First and Last Name Ted Carlson Q2.Address 5516 Knoll Drive Q3.Comment As a 20 year resident and local developer, I am excited that Edina is updating a code that is 50 years old. Focus on transit, ride-share, bikes and pedestrians is very important! Let's figure out how to get rid of huge parking lots that are misaligned with market demands. Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 10, 2021 12:39:40 pm Last Seen:Apr 10, 2021 12:39:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Chris Brown Q2.Address 4504 West 70th Street Q3.Comment This is definitely a step in the right direction! Unfortunately, this feels like a small step instead of broader change. Especially if we hope to create meaningful change regarding how residents, employees, and visitors travel throughout Edina. The E Line, Green Line extension, and improved bike/ped connections, as well as more mixed-use and dense development planned for parts of the City could all create significant opportunity for parking space reductions. I urge you to consider going further with this in mind. I'm not advocating for removing minimums altogether (at least not right now), but continuing to require 1:1 minimum ratios coupled with minor increases in square footage requirements feels like this opportunity is missing the mark. Edina is not an exurb. It's a first ring suburb with significant built environment benefits that provide a foundation for greater mode shift away from single family vehicles. Key items for your consideration: Sec 1.b: 1.25 space min. for multi-family housing, especially when most of that will be in transit-served areas seems unnecessarily high. Could we consider a 1:1 at the very least? Sec 1.g: Why require two spaces per classroom when students cannot drive anyway? I understand parent or volunteer activities but as an advocate for safe routes to school, let's think bigger. Sec 1.h, k, m, and v: All of these have minimal increases in square footage. Can't we do more? I'm not a parking expert but increasing by 50 sq ft seems paltry. Sec 1.w: This is probably the biggest disappointment. 1:1 for a mixed-use development when this development is likely located near the most desirable multimodal connections? Couldn't we at least try 0.8 minimum and 1.25 maximum? Do we really need three spaces for every two units? I've parked in the Westin's parking garage and it's an excellent example of wasted space (and money). Sec 2 (all): Three of the four PCDs will be served by the E Line. All of these represent the greatest opportunity for Edina to aggressively promote mode shift away from SOVs. In addition to reducing the minimum, these areas would be great locations to promote affordable housing via reduced parking costs. Sec 3: Could a provision to promote affordable housing be included? This policy seems like an excellent opportunity to provide developers with the tools to incentivize inclusion of affordable dwelling units within a broader project or fully- affordable buildings. There are examples of other municipalities using parking policy to accomplish this, so I strongly recommend your review and consideration. We are in the midst of an affordable housing crisis and as a City with many food service, retail, and other traditionally low-wage industries, wouldn't it be great to have these workers have at least the option to live closer to where they work? Parking costs a lot to build, and that cost usually ends up raising tenant rents. $5,000: Cost per surface space $25,000: Cost per above-ground garage space $35,000: Cost per below-ground garage space $142: The typical cost renters pay per month for parking +17%: Additional cost of a unit's rent attributed to parking Thank you for your consideration of my comments! I'm pleased to see the City considering this step in the right direction but I know we can do more! Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 13, 2021 07:30:00 am Last Seen:Apr 13, 2021 07:30:00 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name your mom Q2.Address your mom Q3.Comment your mom Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 13, 2021 07:33:28 am Last Seen:Apr 13, 2021 07:33:28 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Your mom Q2.Address The DEEZ NUTS Rood Q3.Comment its free real estate Respondent No:24 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 15, 2021 06:55:42 am Last Seen:Apr 15, 2021 06:55:42 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Thomas Hoegh Q2.Address 4407 Grimes Ave. S Q3.Comment "If you don't build it, they will still come." - this should be the city's motto regarding parking. The city's 'logic' to reduce parking is reductive. In other words, there is a desire to reduce parking space so they spin explanations and scavenge for data to support that position. This is really, really sad that idealogues are driving public policy. Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 20, 2021 12:43:53 pm Last Seen:Apr 20, 2021 12:43:53 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mic O’Brien Q2.Address 4052 Sunnyside Rd Q3.Comment This sure feels to me like a developer who knowingly built his new building (The Lorient) with insufficient parking, with the knowledge that he would eventually get his way. His subsequent variance request was (somewhat, surprisingly) turned down; however, his new angle is to just get the rules changed. That way, he gets the rent from the large restaurant that he always planned on, the city gets the tax revenue and the surrounding neighborhood takes the brunt of the street-parked cars. Some of my neighbors warned me that this was inevitable — they’ve given up the fight. I guess the city & developer “win”? Respondent No:26 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Apr 22, 2021 09:45:57 am Last Seen:Apr 22, 2021 09:45:57 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Roberta Castellano Q2.Address 4854 France Ave S Q3.Comment I object to any plan that will increase the likelihood of commercial district parking spilling out into the surrounding neighborhoods, reducing the neighbors’ quality of life, and fundamentally and detrimentally altering the character of the surrounding neighborhoods, while simultaneously reducing developers’ required investments into projects. This plan appears to be consistent with City efforts to expand commercial areas into surrounding neighborhoods. At 50th & France, it was discovered during the 50th & France Small Area Planning, that the City had been intending to utilize Eminent Domain, and the City was subsequently found to have inserted into the 50th & France Small Area Plan, an extortion scheme to extract property holdings from Maple Road neighbors, in order to further enable Lunds to redevelop the US Bank site to a greater extent than otherwise possible. This was in addition to multiple underhanded attempts to increase the permitted housing unit density within the district. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX DRAFT - ORDINANCE NO. 2021-__ - DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 36-1311 – Minimum number required. Shall be amended as follows: (a) Single dwelling units, double dwelling units and residential townhouses. One fully enclosed space per dwelling unit. (b) Apartment buildings in the PRD district. (1) 1.25 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit minimum and a maximum of 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit. At least one fully enclosed space per unit required. (c) Senior citizen dwelling unit buildings in the PSR-4 and PSR-5 subdistricts. (1) 0.5 exposed spaces and 0.25 enclosed spaces per senior citizen dwelling unit. (2) In addition to subsection (c)(1) of this section, the following spaces are required: a. One completely enclosed and one exposed space for each non senior citizen dwelling unit located in a building in the Planned Senior Residence District. b. One completely enclosed space per vehicle owned by the building's management and stored on the property; and c. One exposed space for each employee who is not a resident of the building. 0.75 spaces per bedroom, plus one space per employee on a maximum shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management (d) Nursing, convalescent and rest homes. One space for every four five patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. (e) Day care, nurseries and preschools (principal use). One space per teacher or employee, plus one space per 20 individuals (or major fraction) receiving care. (f) Public or private senior high schools and seminaries. One space per classroom plus one space per ten students, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (g) Public or private elementary or junior high schools. Two spaces per classroom, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (h) Community centers. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, or one space for each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. (i) Churches and other religious institutions. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, plus spaces for other church Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 facilities which are used concurrently with the largest place of assembly, the number of which shall be determined by the council in connection with the granting of a conditional use permit. (j) Theaters (except within shopping centers), stadiums, auditoriums, arenas, lodge halls, mortuaries, and clubhouses. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. (k) Governmental administration, public service, post office. The greater of one space: (1) Per employee on the major shift, plus one space per government-owned vehicle, plus ten visitor spaces; or (2) For each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area. (l) Libraries, art galleries. Ten spaces, plus one space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. (m) Medical or dental offices, clinics and animal hospitals. One space for each 200 300 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space per physician, dentist or veterinarian. (n) Hospitals. One space per bed for each two patient beds, plus one space per employee or volunteer on the major shift. (o) Athletic, health and weight reduction facilities. (1) Six Four spaces per court for handball, racquetball, and tennis courts. (2) One space per 200 400 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. (p) Restaurants (except within shopping centers). Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, One space for each 100 square feet of indoor floor area, plus one space for each employee on the major shift and one space for each loading dock. (q) Carwashes. One space per employee on the major shift, plus five spaces for each wash lane, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (r) Accessory carwashes. Two parking spaces, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (s) Gas stations. One space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. (t) Automobile service centers. Three parking spaces per service bay, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. (u) Bowling alleys. Five spaces per lane. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 (v) Offices, medical and dental laboratories, business or professional offices, financial institutions, employment agencies and travel bureaus. Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.00025*GFA)+195] Over 220,000 GFA/250 One space per 300 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. (w) Mixed Development District. (1) Residential. One enclosed space, plus 0.75 exposed space, per dwelling unit. 1.0spaces per dwelling unit minimum with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit. (2) Nonresidential. Excluding publicly owned facilities and uses accessory to residential uses: Shall be regulated per Section 36-1311 above. Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.0005*GFA)+190] Over 220,000 GFA/300 (3) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a commercial restaurant, up to 30% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant. (4) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a residential use, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit. (5) Where there is combined within a single building an office use, a residential use, and a commercial restaurant, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 4 the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit, and up to 30% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant. (x) Multitenant industrial buildings. One space for each 400 500 square feet of gross floor area, or the sum of the component gross floor areas as follows, whichever is greater: (1) One space for each 200 300 square feet of office space. (2) One space for each 2,000 square feet of warehouse space. (3) One space for each 300 square feet of manufacturing, processing, packaging, treatment and assembly space. (4) One space for each 500 square feet of space containing machines and equipment for conducting scientific research, testing or experimentation. (5) One space for each 200 400 square feet of facilities for athletic, health and weight reduction purposes; six spaces per court for handball, racquetball or tennis. (y) Automobile and boat sales, new or used. One space per 250 square feet of gross floor area, including showrooms, sales space and offices, but excluding service areas, plus three spaces for each service bay. Required parking spaces shall not be used for the storage or display of vehicles, boats or other products. (z) Furniture and major appliance sales. (1) Over 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. (2) Under 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. (aa) Hotels and motels. One space per guest unit, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. (bb) Taproom and cocktail room. One space per 40 square feet of gross floor area. (cc) Brewery, winery and distillery without on-site sales. One space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. (dd) Brewpub, brewery, winery and distillery with on-site sales. One space per 1,000 gross square feet of production floor area, and spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift for the restaurant. (ee) Uses not Specified. Where ambiguity exists in the application of off-street parking requirements, or where the parking requirements for a use are not specifically defined herein, the parking requirements for such use shall be determined by the city planner Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 5 or the city planner designee and such determination shall be based upon the requirements for the most comparable use specified in this chapter. Section 2 Sec. 36-1312. - Planned Commercial District. Shall be amended as follows: For uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District, except uses for which a parking quantity is otherwise specified, the minimum spaces are as follows: (1) Planned Commercial District – 1 (PCD-1) (Areas include: 70th and Cahill, ValleyView/Wooddale, 44th and France) Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. (2) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (50th and France, area defined in the 50th and France small area plan) Parking for uses in the 50th and France commercial node may rely on the City Parking Ramps with a floor area ratio up to 1.0. Uses exceeding 1.0 must provide additional off- street parking spaces for the square footage above 1.0. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. (3) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (Grandview, area defined in the Grandview Development Framework) Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 6 Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. (4) Planned Commercial District – 3 (PCD-3) (Property zoned PCD-3 within the Greater Southdale area as defined in the Southdale District Plan) Shopping centers (6+ businesses and at least 25,000 s.f.). One space per 200 350 square feet of gross floor area (including theaters and restaurants), plus one additional space for each ten seats in a restaurant, theater or other place of assembly. Atrium areas and mall areas, not used for retail sales purposes, shall be excluded from gross floor area calculations. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Section 3 Sec. 36-1324. Parking Space Reductions Section 36-1324 is amended to add the following: Reductions. The following off-street parking reductions may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 7 (1) The required aggregate number of spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop; to qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (2) Car-share Parking. A reduction of up to one space or five percent of the overall number of required parking spaces, whichever is greater, may be granted for any development that provides reserved parking for use by car-share vehicles. Parking for car-share vehicles may be provided in any required or non-required off-street parking space. (3) Environmental Sustainability. With the consent of the city planner or the planner’s designee upon review of potential adverse impacts, a reduction of up to ten percent (10%) in parking requirements may be approved for parking areas composed of pervious pavement or where the reduced parking area is used for a low impact development storm water facility; and a reduction of up to twenty percent (20%) in parking requirements may be approved for clustered site design where the reduced parking area is used for tree retention or native landscaping. (4) A 10 percent reduction in parking provided if the following is provided for the following: (a) 1 covered, long-term bike space per 3 dwelling units. (b) 1 covered, long-term bike space per 5,000 s.f. of retail/service uses. (c) 1 short-term bike space per 5,000 s.f. of retail/services uses. In order to qualify for this reduction, the long-term bicycle parking must: (a) Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; (b) Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; (c) Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock; Section 4 Sec. 36-1325. Additional Parking Regulations. Section 36-1325 is amended to add the following: (1) Shared Parking. Shared off-street parking facilities are allowed to collectively provide parking in any district for more than one structure or use, subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant(s) must provide evidence that there is no substantial conflict in the principal operating hours of the buildings or uses for which the joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed. For purposes of this subsection, no substantial conflict shall mean: (a) up to 75 percent of the required parking for daytime use may be provided in the parking facilities of a nighttime or weekend use; or (b) up to 75 percent of the required parking for a nighttime or weekend use may be provided in the parking facilities of a daytime use. A parking plan shall address the hours, size and mode of operation of the Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 8 respective uses. Within the Planned Commercial District, an applicant shall document proposed joint-use parking proposals through the use of the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Model (ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition). (b) The minimum spaces required under a shared parking agreement shall be based on the number of spaces required for the use that requires the most parking. (c) Shared parking facilities shall be protected by an irrevocable legal agreement running with the land and recorded with the county in a form approved by the city attorney. A certified copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the city planner within 60 days after approval of the agreement by the city council. (d) To qualify, parking must be supplied within 300 feet of the main entrance to the parcel and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the principal structure and all parking spaces. (2) Proof of parking measures. An applicant may be eligible for a reduction in the required number of off-street parking spaces where the applicant can demonstrate there is lesser need for the required number of off-street parking spaces, and/or there is a space set aside for code complying off-site parking spaces to be constructed if a need is later indicated by the city issuing authority, provided: (a) Where the applicant is seeking a reduction in the total number of required constructed parking spaces, the lesser number of constructed spaces may be allowed, provided: (i) The city would require a parking study conducted in accordance with accepted methodology approved by the city issuing authority, prepared by an independent traffic engineering professional under the supervision of the city and paid for by the applicant, demonstrating that there is not a present need for the portion of parking for which the applicant is requesting proof of parking flexibility. (ii) Where a site plan is approved with proof of parking measures, a properly drawn legal instrument, memorializing the parking measures drafted and executed by the parties concerned, must be filed with the records for that property in the Registrar of Titles’ or Recorder’s office of the county with proof thereof presented to the issuing authority. (b) Suitability of deferred spaces. The applicant must not assign deferred parking spaces to areas required for landscaping, required buffer zones, setbacks, fire lanes, drive aisles or areas that would otherwise be unsuitable for parking spaces because of the physical characteristics of the land or other requirements of this code. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 9 (c) Conversion of deferred spaces by applicant. The applicant may at any time request that the issuing authority approve a revised site plan to allow conversion of deferred spaces to operable parking spaces. (3) The placement of two (2) abutting off-street parking facilities with continuous street frontage shall not be permitted. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: April 28, 2021 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Off-Street Parking Regulations. In 2020, the Edina City Council requested that the Planning Commission evaluate the appropriateness of the City’s Off-Street Parking Regulations. The City’s current regulations have not been revised since 1992. Many of the current standards have not been amended since 1970. Over the past nine months the Planning Commission has been considering revisions to the off-street parking regulations. Parking requirements often arise when new developments are proposed. Developers sometimes seek to have more or fewer parking spaces than guided by Edina’s Parking Regulations, and residents are sometimes concerned about proposed developments that are perceived to potentially include too much or too little parking. Goals and factors considered during the evaluation of the parking regulations include: trends nationally and around the Twin Cities metropolitan area regarding parking requirements; usage of decades-old parking lots within Edina; current and projected quantities and availability of mass transit; differing needs for different areas of Edina, such as locations where the City has provided mass parking facilities; creating incentives for reduced parking, including sustainability incentives, increasing greenspace, and enhancing mass transit and other forms of multi-modal transportation, such as bike/pedestrian connectivity; climate change and equity; reducing surface parking lots; and previous approvals or rejections of requested variances to Edina’s parking regulations. The Planning Commission recognizes the continued need to consider district parking structures, multi-modal options, and a robust mass transit system. Benefits of reducing minimum parking requirements may include: • Lowering cost for building projects could reduce rents for multi-family residential. Potential to provide more affordable housing. • Reduction in car emissions (if more people use transit, walk or bike). • Potential for more green space and landscaping and potentially public realm/public space. • Less surface parking creates more land available for development which increases tax base, which helps keep residential taxes lower. The following has been considered in the analysis: • Parking regulations for municipalities within the Twin Cities. (see attached comparison table) City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 • Parking regulations for similar and recommended municipalities within the United States. (see attached) • Presentation by Nelson Nygard (parking consultant) with a national perspective regarding parking. (see attached PowerPoint from Nelson Nygard) • Recommendations from Nelson Nygard. (see attached) The Planning Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing and consider the attached Draft Parking Ordinance Amendment. Highlights of the Ordinance Amendment include: Adding incentives for developers to reduce parking including shared parking, bike parking. sustainability and location near transit stops. Adding maximum limits on parking spaces. Having separate regulations within the City’s commercial nodes. Generally reducing the number of parking stalls required. Staff has put together a table (see attached) that compares recent projects in Edina, to the current ordinance and proposed ordinance. It shows the number of parking spaces that that the proposed ordinance would have required, compared to the current ordinance and the number of stalls that were built or will be built. Note that variances would not have been required in most instances, which demonstrates the ordinance is in line with what developers are building within their projects. The following provides some background on the draft ordinance and the changes recommended: Section 1. General Reduction in parking requirement. Uses may be allowed further reductions if located within a transit service area. Some of the more significant changes are as follows: • Apartments – Reduced from 2 spaces per unit to 1.25 minimum and 1.75 maximum spaces per unit. The requirement for 1.25 spaces is consistent with most recent requests for new apartments within Edina. • Medical or dental offices, clinics and animal hospitals – Reduced from one space per 200 square feet to one space per 300 square feet. • Hospitals – Reduced from one space per bed to one space for each two patent beds. • Restaurants – Changed from one-third the seating capacity to one space for each 100 square feet of floor area. • Offices, medical and dental – Requirements are amended from a formula calculation (generally one space per 200 square feet) to one space per 300 square feet, with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. • Mixed Development District – Uses are amended to be consistent with specific use requirements. Residential reduced from 1.75 spaces per unit to 1.0 spaces per unit with a maximum of 1.75 spaces per unit. Additional incentives are provided for shared use. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Section 2 – Planned Commercial Districts. This establishes separate regulations for the City’s Commercial Nodes (44th and France, 70th and Cahill, Valley View and Wooddale, 50th and France, Southdale and Grandview). Section 3 – Parking Space Reductions. Reduction/incentive provisions are added for ridesharing, environmental sustainability, and bike parking. A ten (10%) reduction is allowed if a use is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop; to qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. Section 4. Additional Regulations. Additional regulations cover shared parking, proof-of-parking, and prevent two abutting off-street parking facilities next to each other. The following highlights the reductions made to the draft ordinance and the current draft: Use Current Ordinance 1-27 Draft Regulation Proposed Ordinance Apartments 2.0 spaces per unit 1.25 spaces per unit minimum 1.25 spaces per unit minimum with a 1.75 space per unit maximum Nursing Home One space per 4 patients or residents One space per 4 patients or residents One space per 5 patients or residents Community Center One space per 200 s.f. One space per 200 s.f. One space per 250 s.f. Medical, dental, clinic & animal hospital One space per 200 s.f. One space per 250 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. Restaurant 1 space per 3 seats One space per 100 s.f. plus one space per 150 s.f of outdoor space One space per 100 s.f. no requirement for outside seating Office Formula based on size (generally one space per 200 s.f. One space per 250 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. with a max of one space per 200 s.f. Residential use in a Mixed Development District 1.75 spaces per unit 1.25 spaces per unit minimum 1.0 spaces per unit with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit Residential use in a Planned Commercial District 1-1.5 spaces per unit depending on unit size 1.0 spaces per unit minimum 1.0 spaces per unit with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit Office use in a Planned Commercial District One space per 200 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. One space per 350 s.f. with a maximum of one space per 200 s.f. Shopping Center within a Planned Commercial District One space per 200 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. One space per 350 s.f. Project Examples Current Ordinance Proposed Ordinance 4500 France Restaurant Examples are based on the square footage of the space available. 100 seat restaurant (3,700 s.f.) = requires 43 spaces required 3,700 s.f. restaurant = 42 spaces required (using the 10% reduction - transit stop) Avenue on France (project denied by City Council) Mixed Use District Nonresidential = 1/300 s.f. (708,348 s.f.) 2,361 spaces required Residential = 1 enclosed space/unit (239) + .75 spaces exposed per unit (179) 418 spaces required 2,779 total spaces required Mixed Use District Nonresidential = 1/300 s.f. (708,348 s.f.)(10% reduction – bus stop) 2,125 spaces required Residential = 1 enclosed space/unit (239) 215 spaces required (Council could add spaces if necessary) 2,340 total spaces required 70th and France (project received preliminary approval) Retail (50,000 s.f) & Office (140,000 s.f.) = 1,006 spaces Residential = 379 enclosed spaces 1,385 spaces total required Retail (50,000 s.f) & Office (140,000 s.f.) = 702 spaces Residential = 341 enclosed spaces 1,043 spaces total required (1,170 stalls are proposed) 6950 France (New Furniture Store) 10,000 s.f. of retail = 62 spaces required 10,000 s.f. of retail = 40 spaces required (51 spaces were installed) Amundson Flats (70th and Cahill/Amundson) 62-unit apartment 2 spaces per unit (1.25 enclosed) 124 total required (77 enclosed) 62-unit apartment 1.25 spaces per unit (1 enclosed) 77 total required (62 enclosed) (94 stalls total, 62 enclosed approved) Aeon Housing Project (76th Street) 70-unit apartment 2 spaces per unit (1.25 enclosed) 140 total required (70 enclosed) 70-unit apartment 1.25 spaces per unit (1 enclosed) 70 total required (70 enclosed) (87 stalls total, 64 enclosed approved) Hazelton Apartments 185-unit apartment 2 spaces per unit (1.25 enclosed) 370 total required (185 enclosed) 185-unit apartment 1.25 spaces per unit (1 enclosed) 231 total required (185 enclosed) (277 stalls enclosed approved) 7200-7250 France Development 309-unit apts.-2 space per unit (1.25 enclosed = 618 spaces 30,000 s.f. retail/office = 146 spaces Total Required = 764 spaces 309-unit apt.-1.25 spaces per unit (1 enclosed) = 386 total required (309 enclosed) 30,000 s.f. retail/office = 120 spaces Total Required = 506 spaces (590 stalls approved – 540 underground) Land Uses Current Ordinance Proposed Ordinance Nursing Home One space per 4 patients or residents One space per 5 patients or residents Community Center One space per 200 s.f. One space per 250 s.f. Medical, dental, clinic & animal hospital One space per 200 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. Restaurant 1 space per 3 seats One space per 100 s.f. Office Formula based on size (generally one space per 200 s.f. One space per 300 s.f. with a max of one space per 200 s.f. Residential use in a Mixed Development District 1.75 spaces per unit 1.0 spaces per unit with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit Residential use in a Planned Commercial District 1-1.5 spaces per unit depending on unit size 1.0 spaces per unit with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit Office use in a Planned Commercial District One space per 200 s.f. One space per 350 s.f. with a maximum of one space per 200 s.f. Shopping Center within a Planned Commercial District One space per 200 s.f. One space per 350 s.f. City OfficeMedical OfficeRetailShopping CenterRestaurants Fast food Mixed Use Apartments Sr Apartments Churches Government Day Care Gas Station/Convenience Gas Auto Service Station Hospitals Health Club Theater Community Center LibraryEdina1/200‐1/250 1/200 1/167‐ 1/2001/200+1/10 seats1/3 seats + employ1/3 s+empl .75/1/200 2/unit .75+employ 1/3 seats 1/200 1/per empl + 1/20 1 per empl + 1/100 sq ft1 per bay + 1 per empl + 1per 100 sq ft1 per bed + 1 per empl 6 per court + 1 per 200 sq ft 1/3 seats+ 1per employee 1/220 ‐300 sq ft/seats 10+ 1/per 300 sq ftEden Prairie1/200‐333 max1/200‐ 333 max1/200‐ 1/3331/200‐ 1/333 max1/3‐1/2max1/3‐1/2 maxby use/TBD 1/unit TBD TBD TBD1 per empl + 1 per 6 students1 per empl + 1 per pump + 1 /200 10+ spaces where cars are serviced TBD TBD 1/3 seats 5/1,000 sq. ft. G.F.A. 5/1,000 sq. ft. G.F.A.Minnetonka1/2501/175‐ 20 min1/250 1/250 1/2.5 seats 1/60 sq ft by use/TBD 2/unit 1/unit 1/ 2.5 seats 10+1/500 1/per 6 children 4+3 per stall+ 1per 250 sq ft 4+3 per stall+ 1per 250 sq ft 1/2 per bed + empl 1/225 sq ft 1/3 seats/1/4 seats 4.5 per 1,00010  plus 1 per 500 square Ft + 1 per vehicle kept on the premises;Saint Louis Park1/200‐250 max1/200‐250 max1/250‐ 1/150 max 1/250 1/60 sq ft 1/60 sq ft by use/TBD 1/bed 1/unit 1 / 3 seats by useTBD 1/per 2 empl +1/10 children3 + 4 per service bay 3 + 4 per service bay 1 per 350 sq ft1 per 200 sq. ft. non‐court area. Two spaces per tennis/racquetball court.  One space per each 50 sq. ft. deck area for a swimming pool. 1 per each four seats 28" Based on uses 1 per 300 ssq ftRichfield1/275‐ 350 max1/200‐ 250 max1/200‐1/285 1/250 1/100 sq ft 1/60 sq ft by use /TBD 2/unit/1.25TBD TBD 1/ 3 seats TBD 1/per 5 children 4+2 per bay +1 per 150 sq ft 4+2 per bay +1 per 150 sq ft not listed 1 per 225 sq ft 1 per 3 seats 1.25 if stand alone not listed not listedBloomington1/285 1/285 1/180‐ 1/220 460+1/285 1/ 3 seats 1/180 sq ft by use /TBD 1.8/1 bed‐.75 1.5/unit 1/3 seats TBD1.2 per 10 child + 1 per empl1/200 sq ft +.5 per pump 1/300 sq ft + 3 per bay not listed 1/250 qsft + 1/500 sq ft pool + 2 per court 1/3 seat capacity 1/3 capacity 1/3 capacityGolden Valley1/250 1/200 1/250 1/200 1/60‐100 sq ft 1/40 sq ft by use/TBD 1.5/unit .5/1/unit 1/3 seats 1/200‐300 1/per 5 children 4 per stall 4 per stall 1/350 sq ft 1/200 sq ft + 2 per court + .5 pool deck sq ft 1/4 seats 1/300 sq ft 1/300 sq ftEagan1/150 1/150 1/200 1/250‐300 1/3 seats 1/60 sq ft by use/TBD 1.5/unit 1/unit 1/3 seats TBD 10 + 1 per 500 sq ft 4 + 2 per bay 1/800 sq ft + 1 per empl 1 per 3 occupants 1 per 3 seats 1 per 3 occupants 1 per 3 occupantsApple Valley1/150‐200 1/150 1/150 1/200 1/2.5 seats 1/3 seats by use/TBD 1.5/unit 1.5 TBD 1/3.5 seats TBDTen spaces, plus one space for each 500 square feet in the principal structure.Four off‐street parking spaces, plus two off‐street parking spaces for each service stall if any.Ten customer parking spaces, plus one additional customer space for each 800 square feet of floor area over 1,000 square feet, plus oneadditional space for every two employees.One and one‐half parking spaces for each three patient beds, plus one space for each two employees, plus one space for each staff doctor.Four off‐street parking spaces, plus two off‐street parking spaces for each service stall if any..  One parking space for each three seats..  One parking space for each 3½ seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall.One parking space for each 150 square feet of floor space.Crystal4+1/200‐500 4+1/200‐500 4+1/250 4+1/500 4+1/100 sq ft 4+1/60 sq ft by use/TBD 2/per unit 2/unit 4+1/3 seats TBD TBD4 spaces, plus 2 spaces per service or repair stall if applicable, plus no less than 1 space per 300 square feet of building area used for the sale of goods or services TBDNumber of spaces as required per a parking study 4 spaces, plus no less than 300 square feet of gross floor area, not including court, gym or pool area, plus 4 spaces per basketball court, plus 2 spaces pertennis or racquetball court, plus 1 space per 50 square feet of deck area for a swimming pool.4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 4 seats based on the cumulative design capacity of the assembly room or spaces4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 3 seats based on the cumulative design capacity of the assembly room or spaces 4 spaces, plus no less than 1 space per 400 square feet of gross floor area 4 spaces, plus no more than 1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area Plymouth1/250 ‐ 300 1/200 1/200 1/200‐300  1/40+1/80 kit 1/2.5 seats by use/TBD 2/per unit 1.5/unit 1/3 seats 1/300 sq ftOne space for each employee, plus one space for each six individuals of licensed capacity. Four spaces plus two spaces for each service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other items than strictly automobile products, parts or service shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this Chapter. Four spaces plus two spaces for each service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other items than strictly automobile products, parts or service shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this Chapter. TBD One space for each 300 square feet of floor area. One space for each three permanent seats basedon the design capacity of the main assembly hall.Facilities as may be provided in conjunction with such buildings or uses shall be subject to additional requirements which are imposed by this Chapter. One space for each 300 square feet of floor area. One space for each 300 square feet of floor area. New Hope1/300 1/300 1/200 1/200 1/40+1/80 kit 1/40+1/80 ki by use/TBD 2.25 unit 1/unit+employ 1/3 seats 1/300 sq ft TBDAt least five off‐street parking spaces plus three off‐street parking spaces for each service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other items than strictly automotive products, parts or service shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this CodeAt least five off‐street parking spaces plus three off‐street parking spaces for each service stall. Those facilities designed for sale of other items than strictly automotive products, parts or service shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this CodeTBD TBDAt least one parking space for each three seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. Facilities as may be provided in conjunction with such buildings or uses shall be subject to additional requirements which are imposed by this Code.. One parking space for each 300 square feet of floor area.. One parking space for each 300 square feet of floor area.Maple Grove1/250 1/150 1/200 1/250 1/40+/80 kit 1/150 sq ft by use/TBD 2/unit 1/unit 1/3 seats TBD TBDAt least four off‐street parking spaces plus two off‐street parking spaces for each service stall. The requirement of at least four off‐street parking spaces may be waived for those facilities designed for sale of items other than strictly automotive products, parts or service, although such facilities shall be required to provide additional parking in compliance with other applicable sections of this article, such as, but not limited to, the requirements of subsections (a)(12) and (a)(16) of this section. Eight off‐street parking spaces, plus one additional space for each 800 square feet of floor area over 1,000 square feet. Two spaces per each bed. Private racquetball, handball and tennis courts: Not less than six spaces per each court. (29)  Other uses: Requirements for other uses not specifically mentioned in this section shall be determined on an individual basis by the city council. Factors to be considered in such determination shall include, without limitation, size of building, type of use, number of employees, expected volume and turnover of customer traffic and expected frequency and number of delivery or service vehicles. At least one parking space for each three seats based on the design capacity of the main assembly hall. Facilities as may be provided in conjunction with such buildings or uses shall be subject to additional requirements which are imposed by this article. Ten spaces plus one for each 150 square feet in excess of 2,000 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. Ten spaces plus one for each 150 square feet in excess of 2,000 square feet of floor area in the principal structure. Brooklyn Park1/181/200 1/150+Dr. 1/200 1/200‐240 1/40+1/80 kit 1/40+1/80 ki by use/TBD 2/unit+.5 outside .5/unit 1/2.5 seats 1/200‐285No additional spaces required if located in a single dwelling or one unit in a multiple dwelling structure 1 space per employee plusone space per 7 children of licensed capacity of the facility4 spaces plus 3 spaces for each enclosed service stall plus parking figured separately for retail or office space.3 for each  bay plus 1 for each employee on peak work shift2 spaces for each patient bed1 space per 300 square feet of floor area, plus 1 space per employee on the largest work shift1 space for each 3.5 seats of design capacity1 space for each 2.5 seats (one seat equals 22 inches  of pew or bench space)based on the design capacity in the main assembly area, plus parking figured separately for additional gymnasiums, banquet rooms, meeting rooms, offices, and other multi‐use spacesTBDArden Hills1/250 1/250 1/150 1/150 1/2 seats 1/2 seats by use/TBD 1.1‐2.2 per unit TBD 1/3 seats TBD1 for each teacher or employee plus 1 for each 5 individuals receiving care (design capacity)3 for each enclosed bay plus 1 for each employee on peak work shift3 for each enclosed bay plus 1 for each employee on peak work shiftAs determined by City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission.1 for each 1.5 persons at design capacity 1 for every 3 seats (based on design capacity)1 for every 3 seats (based on design capacity)As determined by City Council after recommendation by Planning Commission.Shoreview1/200 1/200 1/181 1/181 1/3 seats 1/5 seats/15 by use /TBD 1.5 ‐ 2per unit TBD 1/3 seats TBD TBD Fuel Stations. 4 plus 1/150 sq. ft. floor space devoted to retail sales  Vehicle & Equipment Sales and Rental. 8 + 1/800 sq. ft. floor area over 1,000 .1.2/bed Commercial Recreation. 10 + 1/300 sq. ft. of floor area 1/3 seats based on max. design capacity 10 + 1/300 sq. ft. of floor area TBDRoseville1/275‐1/325 1/250 1/325 1/3251/3 seats 1/employ11/60 sq ft by use/TBD 1.25/unit 1.25 unit 1/4 seats TBD1 per 10 = 1 per employee3spaces 4 per bay TBD 1/200, 2 per court,,1 per 50sq ft pool deck 1/4 seats TBD/uses 1/300 sq ftMaplewood1/200 1/200 1/200 1/200 1/50 sq ft 1/50 sq ft by use/TBD 2/1 encl 2/per unit 1/4 seats TBD1  per 4 seats 1 per 4 seatsOakdale1/166 ‐ 200 6/Dr. 1/empl 1/200 1/2001/3 seats1/2em 1/table1/per table by use/TBD 1.5 ‐ 2.5 unit .5‐1/unit 1/4 seats TBD TBD 4 + 2 per stall 4 + 2 per stall TBD 3 per court 1/3 cap TBD TBDBurnsville1/666 ‐ 200 3/Dr. 1/empl 1/150 ‐ 1/200 1/2001/3 seats1/2em 1/table1/3 seats+em by use/TBD 1,5 ‐ 2.5 unit .5/unit 1/3 seats TBD 1/empl + 1/6 students 1/200 sq ft + 1 per pump 1/200 sq ft +3/bay + 1per empl 2 per 3 beds 1 per empl 1/2 space per occ, 1/500 sq ft + 1 per empl 1 per 4 seats + 1 empl1per 3 patrons +1 per vehicle + 1 per empl1/250 sq ft + 1/empl + 1/4 seats City OfficeMedical OfficeRetailShopping CenterRestaurants Fast food Mixed Use Apartments Sr Apartments Churches Government Day Care Gas Station/Convenience Gas Auto Service Station Hospitals Health Club Theater Community Center LibraryMpls2/1000‐1/200 2/1000 2/1000‐1/200 1/2002/1000‐1/75 qs ft1/75 sq ft by use TBD 1/unit 1/unit 10% capacit 1/2001 space per 500 sq. ft. of GFA + 2 drop off spaces (either off‐street or on‐street by permission of  the city engineer) 1 space per 200 sq. ft. of GFA + up to 4 drop off spaces (either off‐street or on‐street by permission of the city engineer)  1 space per 500 sq. Ō. of GFA 1  space per 200 sq. Ō. of GFA 1 Pump islands shall not be counted as parking spaces 1 space per 500 sq. ft. of GFA excluding service bays +  2 spaces per service bay 1 space per 200 sq. Ō. of GFA+ 2 spaces per service bay As approved by C.U.P. based on a parking study of the institution, but  not less than 1 space per 3 beds As approved by C.U.P. based on a parking study of the institution, but not more than 1 space per 2 beds 1 space per 500 sq. ft. of GFA + as required by this  chapter for applicable indoor recreaƟon areas 1 space per 200 sq. ft. of GFA Parking equal to 20% of the capacity of persons  in the auditorium Parking equal to 40% of the capacity of persons in the auditorium TBD1 space per 500 sq. ft. of GFA in excess of 4,000 sq. ftHighland Park*Office sites in Commercial Districts sites <15,000 sf: 2.5/1,000 >15,000 sf: 0 for first 2,000 sf, then 2.5/1000 additional sf >15,000 sf: 0 for first 2,000 sf, then 2.5/1000 additional sf4.11 spaces per 1000 sfDevelopment site <15000: 2.5/1000sf >15000: none for first 2000 sf then 2.5 spaces per 1000 sf20 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA for kitchen area, serving counter and waiting area, plus 0.5 spaces per seat 20 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA for kitchen area, serving counter and waiting area, plus 0.5 spaces per seat See attached word docNursing Facility: .33 space per resident.25 spaces per person in permitted occupancyAs determined by zoning administrator 2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of GFA interior sales space plus 1.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of external display (does not include stock areas closed to the public) plus 3 spaces per service bay2.5 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of GFA plus 3 spaces per service bay0.33 space per person in permitted occupancy 0.25 space per person in permitted occupancy0.25 space per person in permitted occupancy0.25 space per person in permitted occupancyPortland*1 per 500sf of net bu8ilding area 1 per 500 sq. ft. of net building area Medical Center 1 per 500 sf 1 per 330 sq. ft. of net building area 1 per 4 seats or 1 per 6 feet of bench area 1 per 500 sfDurham, NC* 1/250 1/2501/200 for first 50000 sf of leaseable area and 1/250 sf leaseable area after that1/100 sf 1/100 sf 2/unit .6/unit1/28 sf of avaiable seating in assembly area1/300 sf + 1 per 3 employees1 per employee + 1 per each 10 attendees1 per 2 beds + 1 per doctor and nurse + 1 per 4 employees1/100 sf1 per 200 SF floor area available for seating in places of assembly, minimum 20 spacesDenver*Park Ridge* Office Park: 5/1000 / Professional Office 4/10001.5/exam room3/10001/60 sf pulbic seating (excludes outdoor seating)3/1000Efficiency or 1‐bedroom unit:1.5 per dwelling unit 2‐bedroom or more unit: 2 per dwelling unit .25 per bed + 1 per 2 employees1/4 seats 3/1000 sf1 per 2 employees + 2 passenger loading spaces2 per 1000 sf GFA of any accessory convenience retail and/or foold service plus 2 stacking spaces per bay for any accessory automatic car wash2 per service bay + 1 per 500 sf of office and waiting area 1 per 2 beds + 2 per 3 employees based on largest shift 1 per 1000 sf of public use space 4/1000 sf public space 3 per 1000 gfa Glenview, IL*1/300 1/300 1/3001/3 people per max capacity1/3 people per max capacity2 per unit1/3 units 1/3 seats 1/800 1 per 350sf GFA  4 parking spaces plus one for each employee plus one space for each emergency vehcle kept on the premises three parking spaces for each five beds, plus three parking spaces for every five employees, other than doctors, plus one space for each doctor assigned to the staffOne parking space for each three seats or bench seating spaces, based upon the maximum permanent seating capacity. For the purpose of such use, parking spaces already provided to meet off‐street parking requirements for business, commercial and industrial establishments, or off‐street parking facilities provided by the Village, lying within 300 feet of the place of public assembly as measured along lines of public access, and that are not normally in use between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and midnight or on Sundays or holidays, and are made available for other parking, may be used to meet up to 75 percent of the total requirements for parking spaces for places of public assemblyone parking space for each 800 square feet of floor area. one parking space for each 800 square feet of floor area. Nashville1/300 sf 1/200 sf 1/200 sfShopping Center Retail: 1 space per 250 square feet for less than 400,000 square feet and 1 space per 225 square feet for 400,000 to 600,000 square feet and 1 space per 200 square feet for 1/100 sf and 10 spaces for takeout 1/100 sf by use 1 per bedroom up to 2 bedrooms; .5 spaces per bedroom for each additional bedroom; 2 bedrooms or more‐1.5 per unit .5 spaces per unit 1 space per 4 seats in the sanctuary or equivalent worship space1 space for each 5 individuals accommodated, up to 50 individuals; for more than 50 individuals accommodated, 10 spaces plus 1 space per 10 individuals4 spaces for each of the first four service bays or stalls,plus 2 spaces for each additional service bay or stall2 spaces per bedEstablished by the traffic engineer (Section 17.20.030)1 space per 3 seats—Established by the traffic engineer for facilities with a capacity of more than 500 spectatorsPuyallup, WAhttps://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Puyallup/html/Puyallup20/Puyallup2055.html Day care centers: one space for each 100 square feet of indoor play area and classroom space; Automobile service stations and repair garages: three spaces for each service bay;(19) Motorcycle and small engine vehicle sales and service: one space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space for each 1,000 square feet of open sales lot;Hospitals: three spaces for each bed the facility is designed to accommodate;Health and physical fitness clubs: one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area;Theaters and auditoriums: one space for each five seats. A “seat” means 18 lineal inches of bench seating or seven square feet of seating floor area where there are no permanent seats;Libraries and museums: one space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area;Bloomingtonhttps://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/bloomington/latest/bloomington_mn/0‐0‐0‐109945#JD_21.301.0621.301.06 (e) 1.2 spaces for each 10 program participants based on the facility’s licensed capacity, plus 1 space per caregiver on the maximum shift1 space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, with no more than 0.5 of the required spaces located at fuel pumps1 space per 300 square feet of gross floor area excluding service bays, plus 2 spaces per service bayN/A1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area (not including swimming pools), and additional off‐streetparking for the following uses:   Swimming pool: 1 space per 500 square feet of gross floor area;  Tennis, handball or racquetball: 2 spaces per courtSpaces equal in number to 1/3 capacity in persons; if use includes an educational component, those facilities are required to provide additional parking as provided in the ordinance under educational institutionsSpaces equal in number to 1/3 capacity in persons; if use includes an educational component, those facilities are required to provide additional parking as provided in the ordinance under educational institutions See Tables in attached Word Doc‐Minimums and Maximums by use determined by zone‐use first link to see zoning information See email from staff in attached word doc*Detailed information included on word doc City Office Medical Office Retail Shopping Center Restaurants Apartments Sr Apartments Edina - Current Ordinance 1/200-1/250 sf 1/200 sf 1/167- 1/200 1/200+1/10 seats (formula)1/3 seats + employ 2/unit .75+employ Edina 1-27 draft 1/250 sf 1/250 sf 1/250 sf 1/300 sf 1/100 s.f. plus 1/150 s.f of outdoor space 1-1.25/unit .75+employ Edina 2-24 draft 1/300 sf (1/200 max)1/300 sf 1/250 sf 1/350 sf 1/100 sf 1-1.25/unit with 1.75 max .75+employ Eden Prairie 1/200-333 max 1/200- 333 max 1/200- 1/333 1/200- 1/333 max 1/3-1/2max1/3-1/2 max 1/unit TBD Minnetonka 1/250 1/175- 20 min 1/250 1/250 1/2.5 seats 2/unit 1/unit Saint Louis Park 1/200-250 max 1/200-250 max 1/250- 1/150 max 1/250 1/60 sq ft 1/bed 1/unit Richfield 1/275- 350 max 1/200- 250 max 1/200-1/285 1/250 1/100 sq ft 2/unit/1.25TBD TBD Bloomington 1/285 1/285 1/180- 1/220 460+1/285 1/ 3 seats 1.8/1 bed-.75 1.5/unit Golden Valley 1/250 1/200 1/250 1/200 1/60-100 sq ft 1.5/unit .5/1/unit Apple Valley 1/150-200 1/150 1/150 1/200 1/2.5 seats 1.5/unit 1.5 TBD Crystal 4+1/200-500 4+1/200-500 4+1/250 4+1/500 4+1/100 sq ft 2/per unit 2/unit Plymouth 1/250 - 300 1/200 1/200 1/200-300 1/40+1/80 kit 2/per unit 1.5/unit New Hope 1/300 1/300 1/200 1/200 1/40+1/80 kit 2.25 unit 1/unit+employ Brooklyn Park 1/181/200 1/150+Dr.1/200 1/200-240 1/40+1/80 kit 2/unit+.5 outside .5/unit Roseville 1/275-1/325 1/250 1/325 1/325 1/3 seats 1/employ 1.25/unit 1.25 unit Burnsville 1/666 - 200 3/Dr. 1/empl 1/150 - 1/200 1/200 1/3 seats1/2em 1/table 1,5 - 2.5 unit .5/unit Mpls 2/1000-1/200 2/1000 2/1000-1/200 1/200 2/1000-1/75 qs ft 1/unit 1/unit Highland Park* Office sites in Commercial Districts sites <15,000 sf: 2.5/1,000 >15,000 sf: 0 for first 2,000 sf, then 2.5/1000 additional sf >15,000 sf: 0 for first 2,000 sf, then 2.5/1000 additional sf 4.11 spaces per 1000 sf Development site <15000: 2.5/1000sf >15000: none for first 2000 sf then 2.5 spaces per 1000 sf 20 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA for kitchen area, serving counter and waiting area, plus 0.5 spaces per seat See attached word doc Nursing Facility: .33 space per resident Durham, NC* 1/250 1/250 1/200 to 1/250 sf 1/100 sf 2/unit .6/unit Park Ridge, IL* Office Park: 5/1000 / Professional Office 4/1000 1.5/exam room 3/1000 1/60 sf pulbic seating (excludes outdoor seating) 1.5 to 2 per dwelling unit .25 per bed + 1 per 2 employees Glenview, IL*1/300 1/300 1/300 1/3 people per max capacity 2 per unit 1/3 units Nashville, Tenn.1/300 sf 1/200 sf 1/200 sf 1 space per 250 square feet to 200 s.f. 1/100 sf and 10 spaces for takeout 1 to 1.5 per bedroom .5 spaces per unit City Office Medical Office Retail Shopping Center Restaurants Apartments Sr Apartments Birmingham, Ala 1/300 sf 1/150 sf 1/300 sf 1/300-550 sf 1/75 sf 1.5-2/UNIT .5 spaces per unit Dublin Ohio 1/250 sf 1/200 sf 1/200 sf 1/200 sf 1/50 sf 2/unit 1/unit Charlotte, NC 1/300 sf 1/200 sf 1/200 sf 1/250 sf 1/75 sf 1.5-2/unit .25/unit Sustainable Parking Policies City of Edina, MN Planning Commission Iain Banks, Nelson\Nygaard Tom Brown, Nelson\Nygaard Overview Sustainable Parking Policies gave away free pizza, would you ever have Which uses make your urban areas active? Parking Wastes Land If you require more than 3 spaces per 1,000 sq ft, parking than land use You Have More Parking than You Think Downtown Portsmouth, NH On-Street Off-Street 330 428 456 463 533 553 287 189 161 154 84 64 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 8:00 PM Sustainable Parking Policies Best Practices for a Sustainable Parking Program Price public parking Parking benefit districts Expand access beyond parking Elimination/reduction of parking minimums Promote/require unbundling of parking costs Promote/enable parking cash-out Residential parking permit 8 Phase I: Price Public Parking Establish as formal policy that: Public parking resources will be priced whenever, and wherever free parking will result in too few available spaces. Prices will be adjusted based on performance (actual vs. preferred utilization rates). 9 Step 1 Put it in Writing Codify Access to public parking will be maintained primarily through pricing Define Performance Target (about 15% availability) Frequency of potential rate adjustments Increment of adjustment Conditions that will trigger an adjustment: Availability consistently 5-10 percentage points above or below target (85% for on-street, 85-95% for off-street), As measured by field conditions surveys to be conducted no less frequently than monthly. 10 11 12 Phase I: Price Public Parking Establish as formal policy that: Off-street supplies will have to be self- financing. Rates must reflect cost of maintaining the facility, including any debt service obligations. No new supply will be built until rates are high enough for user fees to cover its costs. 13 Step 1 Put it in Writing Many parking authorities operate under this philosophy already. Putting it in writing can help stave off political pressure to do the wrong thing. 14 15 16 17 Step 2 Define New Paradigm Define proposed paradigm shift Outline its many benefits, most of which directly benefit them: Parking rates based on performance, not revenue Easier access for their customers Particularly those not scared away by a $1 charge for the best spot in downtown. New revenue will be isolated from general fund. Spent on local improvements, As prioritized by local stakeholders Rates will only go up or down in response to market indicators. Consumers, not planners or politicians, will determine how much a space is worth. 18 Glendale, CA 19 Step 3 Bring Merchants Onboard Create Parking Benefit Districts Famously successful for turning around Old Pasadena, CA Spend new revenue on local improvements. This was a big step toward getting meters installed in Ventura, CA 20 Step 4 Monitor And Adjust 21 Step 4 Monitor And Adjust 22 Step 5 Invest to Expand Access Beyond Parking Most cities in MN have plenty of latent demand for some kind of alternate mode: Bikes: Network improvements, parking facilities, employee benefits, promotional events Transit: Improved stop amenities, employee benefits, subsidize new, improved service Pedestrian: Support Park-Once access via improvements to pedestrian networks and general streetscape. In most cases, these investments can expand access for much less than new parking construction They also reduce parking demand, thereby reducing the need to increase parking rates for drivers. 23 24 25 Phase II: Encourage Pricing of Accessory Parking Step 1: Stop Mandating Oversupply Eliminate/ Reduce minimum parking requirements Forcing developers to build more parking than their pro- forma indicates is the best way to ensure that those spaces will be free. Allow developers to build as little or as much parking as they, and their backers, deem necessary. If this might lead to too much parking in sensitive areas, consider Maximums. 26 Phase II: Encourage Pricing of Accessory Parking Step 2: Directly Promote Pricing by Building Owners Promote or Require Unbundling Reveals cost of on-site parking to tenants Tenants have opportunity to save $ by parking less Developers must ensure a paying market for proposed supply Works well with parking maximums and shared-parking incentives. Require unbundling only for spaces: Built in excess of desirable levels Not shared with off-site users 27 Phase II: Encourage Pricing of Private Parking Step 3: Directly Promote Pricing by Employers Promote or Require Parking Cashout Businesses pass on parking costs to employees/ sub-tenants Employees drive less Tenants save $ on unbundled parking. State of California requires certain employers who provide subsidized employee parking to offer a cash allowance in lieu of a parking space. Enacted after studies showed cash allowances in lieu of parking encourage employees to find alternate means of commuting to work, such as public transit, carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, or walking. 28 Phase II: Encourage Pricing of Accessory Parking Step 4: Lead by Example 29 Phase III: Manage Spillover 30 Image: Flickr User johnducguz Residential Parking Permits This is a more effective way to protect curb parking for residents. Like meters these have not always been used to their full potential, reducing public confidence Emerging best practices to learn from, including: Demand-responsive (matching hours and restrictions to address local conditions) Residential Parking Benefit Districts (Residents park free, others pay, revenue goes to neighborhood improvements) Austin, Montreal Variable permit rates (based on demand, number of permits, time of year, etc.) Arlington County, Canada 31 NELSON\NYGAARD CONSULTING ASSOCIATES © 2011 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX DRAFT - ORDINANCE NO. 2021-__ - DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 36-1311 – Minimum number required. Shall be amended as follows: (a) Single dwelling units, double dwelling units and residential townhouses. One fully enclosed space per dwelling unit. (b) Apartment buildings in the PRD district. (1) 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and 0.75 exposed spaces per dwelling unit. (2) The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) to not less than 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stopnumber of enclosed spaces is increased by a like amount so that the total number of exposed and enclosed spaces equals not less than two per dwelling unit. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (3) [need to specify number of spaces for handicapped, ride -sharing, emergency access, loading, other special use cases] (c) Senior citizen dwelling unit buildings in the PSR-4 and PSR-5 subdistricts. (1) 0.5 exposed spaces and 0.25 enclosed spaces per senior citizen dwelling unit. (2) In addition to subsection (c)(1) of this section, the following spaces are required: a. One completely enclosed and one exposed space for each non senior citizen dwelling unit located in a building in the Planned Senior Residence District. b. One completely enclosed space per vehicle owned by the building's management and stored on the property; and c. One exposed space for each employee who is not a resident of the building. Options: 0.75 spaces per bedroom, plus one space per employee on a maximum shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management; 1 space per unit plus one space per employee on a maximum shift; one space per three units; other? (The aggregate number of required parking spaces for Eemployees parking spaces may be reduced by ten 10 percent (10%) for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a qualified transit stop.) To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (d) Nursing, convalescent and rest homes. One space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. (e) Day care, nurseries and preschools (principal use). One space per teacher or employee, plus one space per 20 individuals (or major fraction) receiving care. Commented [BT1]: Consider options to reduce by 10% each, for: 1) transit proximity and 2) the unbundling the cost of residential parking. (https://www.parkingtoolboxntx.org/ptdm-tools- content/Unbundled-Parking-Costs) With both, this would bring the requirement down to 1/DU, which would facilitate developments that intentionally leverage transit proximity to market to low/no-car households. Commented [BT2]: Just noting that the language used directly below uses the term “major shift”. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Public or private senior high schools and seminaries. One space per classroom plus one space per ten students, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (g) Public or private elementary or junior high schools. Two spaces per classroom, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (h) Community centers. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, or one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (i) Churches and other religious institutions. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, plus spaces for other church facilities which are used concurrently with the largest place of assembly, the number of which shall be determined by the council in connection with the granting of a conditional use permit. (j) Theaters (except within shopping centers), stadiums, auditoriums, arenas, lodge halls, mortuaries, and clubhouses. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (k) Governmental administration, public service, post office. The greater of one space: (1) Per employee on the major shift, plus one space per government-owned vehicle, plus ten visitor spaces; or (2) For each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area. The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (l) Libraries, art galleries. Ten spaces, plus one space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 (m) Medical or dental offices, clinics and animal hospitals. One space for each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space per physician, dentist or veterinarian. The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (n) Hospitals. One space per bed for each two patient beds, plus one space per employee or volunteer on the major shift. Required spaces for employees or volunteers may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (o) Athletic, health and weight reduction facilities. (1) Six Four spaces per court for handball, racquetball, and tennis courts. (2) One space per 200 500 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (p) Restaurants (except within shopping centers). Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, One space for each 100 square feet of indoor floor area, one space per each 150 square feet of outdoor floor area plus one space for each employee on the major shift and one space for each loading dock. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (q) Carwashes. One space per employee on the major shift, plus five spaces for each wash lane, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (r) Accessory carwashes. Two parking spaces, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (s) Gas stations. One space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. (t) Automobile service centers. Three parking spaces per service bay, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 4 (u) Bowling alleys. Five spaces per lane. (v) Offices, medical and dental laboratories, business or professional offices, financial institutions, employment agencies and travel bureaus. Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.00025*GFA)+195] Over 220,000 GFA/250 One space per 250 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (w) Mixed Development District. (1) Residential. One enclosed space, plus 0.75 exposed space, per dwelling unit. 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and 0.75 exposed spaces per dwelling unit. The required aggregate number of exposed spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) to not less than 0.5 spaces per dwelling unit if the building is located within one quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop (2) Nonresidential. Excluding publicly owned facilities and uses accessory to residential uses: Shall be regulated per Section 36-1311 above. Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.0005*GFA)+190] Over 220,000 GFA/300 (3) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a commercial restaurant, up to 30% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant. (4) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a residential use, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 5 use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit. (5) Where there is combined within a single building an office use, a residential use, and a commercial restaurant, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit, and up to 30% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant. (x) Multitenant industrial buildings. One space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, or the sum of the component gross floor areas as follows, whichever is greater: (1) One space for each 200 square feet of office space. (2) One space for each 2,000 square feet of warehouse space. (3) One space for each 300 square feet of manufacturing, processing, packaging, treatment and assembly space. (4) One space for each 500 square feet of space containing machines and equipment for conducting scientific research, testing or experimentation. (5) One space for each 200 square feet of facilities for athletic, health and weight reduction purposes; six spaces per court for handball, racquet ball or tennis. (y) Automobile and boat sales, new or used. One space per 250 square feet of gross floor area, including showrooms, sales space and offices, but excluding service areas, plus three spaces for each service bay. Required parking spaces shall not be used for the storage or display of vehicles, boats or other products. (z) Furniture and major appliance sales. (1) Over 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. (2) Under 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. (aa) Hotels and motels. One space per guest unit, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. (bb) Taproom and cocktail room. One space per 40 square feet of gross floor area. (cc) Brewery, winery and distillery without on-site sales. One space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. (dd) Brewpub, winery and distillery with on-site sales. One space per 1,000 gross square feet of production floor area, and spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift for the restaurant. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 6 (ee) Uses not Specified. Where ambiguity exists in the application of off-street parking requirements, or where the parking requirements for a use are not specifically defined herein, the parking requirements for such use shall be determined by the city planner or the city planner designee and such determination shall be based upon the requirements for the most comparable use specified in this chapter. Section 2 Sec. 36-1312. - Planned Commercial District. Shall be amended as follows: For uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District, except uses for which a parking quantity is otherwise specified, the minimum spaces are as follows: (1) Planned Commercial District – 1 (PCD-1) (Areas include: 70th and Cahill, ValleyView/Wooddale, 44th and France) Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 1.25 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 300 square feet. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (2) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (50th and France, area defined in the 50th and France small area plan) Developments with a floor area ratio up to 1.0 Parking for uses in the 50th and France commercial node may rely on the City Parking Ramps to meet the parking requirements for all on-site useswith a floor area ratio up to 1.0. Uses Developments exceeding 1.0 must provide additional off-street parking spaces for the uses linked to the square footage above 1.0. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 1.25 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the Commented [BT3]: Consider options to reduce by 10% each, for: 1) transit proximity and 2) the unbundling the cost of residential parking. (https://www.parkingtoolboxntx.org/ptdm-tools- content/Unbundled-Parking-Costs) Commented [BT4]: I would consider striking this, especially if you do not provide a reduction option for transit proximity. There are other ways for developers to maintain availability for residents in a shared facility. Requiring design/physical barriers to achieve this will prevent potential shared-parking efficiencies, which may become particularly important as mobility trends and car-ownership rates evolve and fluctuate. Commented [BT5]: What is the intent of this? Commented [BT6]: I assume you want to frame the FAR around the project itself, and not the individual uses it contains. A development with a 5 FAR could contain 6 uses that are all smaller than 1 FAR. Commented [BT7]: Consider options to reduce by 10% each, for: 1)transit proximity and 2) the unbundling the cost of residential parking. (https://www.parkingtoolboxntx.org/ptdm-tools- content/Unbundled-Parking-Costs) Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 7 exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. (3) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (Grandview, area defined in the Grandview Development Framework) Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 1.25 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 300 square feet. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (4) Planned Commercial District – 3 (PCD-3) (Property zoned PCD-3 within the Greater Southdale area as defined in the Southdale District Plan) Shopping centers (6+ businesses and at least 25,000 s.f.). One space per 200 300 square feet of gross floor area (including theaters and restaurants), plus one additional space for each ten seats in a restaurant, theater or other place of assembly. Atrium areas and mall areas, not used for retail sales purposes, shall be excluded from gross floor area calculations. Required spaces may be reduced by 10 percent for any parcel located within one quarter of a mile of a transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 1.25 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Commented [BT8]: I would consider striking this, especially if you do not provide a reduction option for transit proximity. There are other ways for developers to maintain availability for residents in a shared facility. Requiring design/physical barriers to achieve this will prevent potential shared-parking efficiencies, which may become particularly important as mobility trends and car-ownership rates evolve and fluctuate. Commented [BT9]: What is the intent of this? Commented [BT10]: Consider options to reduce by 10% each, for: 1)transit proximity and 2) the unbundling the cost of residential parking. (https://www.parkingtoolboxntx.org/ptdm-tools- content/Unbundled-Parking-Costs) Commented [BT11]: I would consider striking this, especially if you do not provide a reduction option for transit proximity. There are other ways for developers to maintain availability for residents in a shared facility. Requiring design/physical barriers to achieve this will prevent potential shared-parking efficiencies, which may become particularly important as mobility trends and car-ownership rates evolve and fluctuate. Commented [BT12]: What is the intent of this? Commented [BT13]: Consider options to reduce by 10% each, for: 1)transit proximity and 2) the unbundling the cost of residential parking. (https://www.parkingtoolboxntx.org/ptdm-tools- content/Unbundled-Parking-Costs) Commented [BT14]: I would consider striking this, especially if you do not provide a reduction option for transit proximity. There are other ways for developers to maintain availability for residents in a shared facility. Requiring design/physical barriers to achieve this will prevent potential shared-parking efficiencies, which may become particularly important as mobility trends and car-ownership rates evolve and fluctuate. Commented [BT15]: What is the intent of this? Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 8 Section 3 Sec. 36-1324. Parking Space Reductions Section 36-1324 is amended to add the following: Reductions. The following off-street parking reductions may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: (1) RideCar-share Parking. A reduction of up to one space or five percent of the overall number of required parking spaces, whichever is greater, may be granted for any development that provides reserved parking for use by car-share vehicles. Parking for car-share vehicles may be provided in any required or non-required off-street parking space. (2) Environmental Sustainability. With the consent of the city planner or the planner’s designee upon review of potential adverse impacts, a reduction of up to ten percent (10%) in parking requirements may be approved for parking areas composed of pervious pavement or where the reduced parking area is used for a low impact development storm water facility; and a reduction of up to twenty percent (20%) in parking requirements may be approved for clustered site design where the reduced parking area is used for tree retention or native landscaping. (3) A reduction of up to one nonresidential parking space may be granted for every 10 long- term bicycle parking spaces provided on-site. In order to qualify for this reduction, the long-term bicycle parking must: (i) Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; (ii) Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; (iii) Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock; (iv) Have minimum dimensions of two feet in width by six feet in length, with a minimum overhead vertical clearance of seven feet. Bicycle lockers are exempt from overhead clearance requirements referenced herein. Section 4 Sec. 36-1325. Additional Parking Regulations. Section 36-1325 is amended to add the following: (1) Shared Parking. Shared off-street parking facilities are allowed to collectively provide parking in any district for more than one structure or use, subject to the following conditions: (a) The applicant(s) must provide evidence that there is no substantial conflict in the principal operating hours of the buildings or uses for which the joint use of off-street parking facilities is proposed. For purposes of this subsection, no substantial conflict shall mean: (a) up to 75 percent of the required parking for Commented [BT16]: Another approach to consider: A 10% reduction for providing at least: •1 covered, long-term bike space per 3 dwelling units; and •1 covered, long-term bike space per 5,000 SF of retail/services uses; and •1 conveniently located, short-term bike space per 5,000 SF of retail/services uses. Commented [BT17]: Were bike parking requirements considered for the planned PCDs at all? Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 9 daytime use may be provided in the parking facilities of a nighttime or weekend use; or (b) up to 75 percent of the required parking for a nighttime or weekend use may be provided in the parking facilities of a daytime use. A parking plan shall address the hours, size and mode of operation of the respective uses. Within the Planned Commercial District, an applicant shall document proposed joint-use parking proposals through the use of the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking Model (ULI Shared Parking, Second Edition). (b) The minimum spaces required under a shared parking agreement shall be based on the number of spaces required for the use that requires the most parking. (c) Shared parking facilities shall be protected by an irrevocable legal agreement running with the land and recorded with the county in a form approved by the city attorney. A certified copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the city planner within 60 days after approval of the agreement by the city council. (d) To qualify, parking must be supplied within 300 feet of the main entrance to the parcel and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the principal structure and all parking spaces. (2) Proof of parking measures. An applicant may be eligible for a reduction in the required number of off-street parking spaces where the applicant can demonstrate there is lesser need for the required number of off-street parking spaces, and/or there is a space set aside for code complying off-site parking spaces to be constructed if a need is later indicated by the city issuing authority, provided: (a) Where the applicant is seeking a reduction in the total number of required constructed parking spaces, the lesser number of constructed spaces may be allowed, provided: (i) The city would require a parking study conducted in accordance with accepted methodology approved by the city issuing authority, prepared by an independent traffic engineering professional under the supervision of the city and paid for by the applicant, demonstrating that there is not a present need for the portion of parking for which the applicant is requesting proof of parking flexibility. (ii) Where a site plan is approved with proof of parking measures, a properly drawn legal instrument, memorializing the parking measures drafted and executed by the parties concerned, must be filed with the records for that property in the Registrar of Titles’ or Recorder’s office of the county with proof thereof presented to the issuing authority. (b) Suitability of deferred spaces. The applicant must not assign deferred parking spaces to areas required for landscaping, required buffer zones, setbacks, fire Commented [BT18]: Consider at least doubling this in PCDs. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 10 lanes, drive aisles or areas that would otherwise be unsuitable for parking spaces because of the physical characteristics of the land or other requirements of this code. (c) Conversion of deferred spaces by applicant. The applicant may at any time request that the issuing authority approve a revised site plan to allow conversion of deferred spaces to operable parking spaces. (3) The placement of two (2) abutting off-street parking facilities with continuous street frontage shall not be permitted. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX Hi, I am submitting some suggested edits to the draft off street parking ordinance changes proposed for review by the Planning Commission on April 28, 2021. My suggestions are included in the redline attached draft of the ordinance. First, as to section 3, proposing to amend section 36-1324, I propose allowing a 10% reduction in required on-site parking spaces only if the transit stop is with 800 feet of the building and only if the transit service runs until at least 11 pm every day. The quarter mile proposed does not make sense in our cold winters, where it’s dangerous to walk at night when the sidewalks are icy and the wind chill can be in the teens or more below zero. No one will ride a bus to a restaurant under those conditions. Even 800 feet is too far, but at least that corresponds with distance limits in other comparable cities in the US. Also, it makes no sense to say someone will take a bus to a restaurant and then have to take an Uber/Lyft home if the bus service has stopped for the day. Requiring bus service until 11 pm, like the No. 6 bus provides, at least allows a return trip by bus instead of by hired car, which defeats the carbon emission reduction that bus ridership achieves. Second, as to the shared parking changes proposed in 36-1325, the proposal is too vague and leaves too much discretion to the city planner. A better system is to establish set percentages that vary with time of day and day of the week. Many cities do this. The only real concern is with a restaurant that wants to establish shared parking with non-restaurant tenants at the same property. Making allowances for peak and non-peak times of day for the restaurant and the non-restaurant tenants is best accomplished by a set formula. One is proposed in the attached draft for only the PCD-1, which are the one in most need to shared parking allowances. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 Finally, the issue of dedicated off-site parking is not addressed in the proposal. Especially at 44th/Sunnyside and France, this is an oversight. Off-site parking could easily be provided by parking lots not used by a dentist, doctor and apartment rental agent on weekday evenings and weekends. With a provision for the requirements of a legal document to establish a right for restaurant patrons to use off-site parking, this could easily provide viable alternative parking and ensure that cars are kept off the surrounding residential streets. I hope you will review by proposals with an open mind. Thank you. Ross Plaetzer | 4058 Sunnyside Road | c: 612.991.8896 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 DRAFT - ORDINANCE NO. 2021-__ - DRAFT AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING OFF STREET PARKING REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 36-1311 – Minimum number required. Shall be amended as follows: (a) Single dwelling units, double dwelling units and residential townhouses. One fully enclosed space per dwelling unit. (b) Apartment buildings in the PRD district. (1) 1.25 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit minimum and a maximum of 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit. At least one fully enclosed space per unit required. (c) Senior citizen dwelling unit buildings in the PSR-4 and PSR-5 subdistricts. (1) 0.5 exposed spaces and 0.25 enclosed spaces per senior citizen dwelling unit. (2) In addition to subsection (c)(1) of this section, the following spaces are required: a. One completely enclosed and one exposed space for each non senior citizen dwelling unit located in a building in the Planned Senior Residence District. b. One completely enclosed space per vehicle owned by the building's management and stored on the property; and c. One exposed space for each employee who is not a resident of the building. 0.75 spaces per bedroom, plus one space per employee on a maximum shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management (d) Nursing, convalescent and rest homes. One space for every four five patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. (e) Day care, nurseries and preschools (principal use). One space per teacher or employee, plus one space per 20 individuals (or major fraction) receiving care. (f) Public or private senior high schools and seminaries. One space per classroom plus one space per ten students, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (g) Public or private elementary or junior high schools. Two spaces per classroom, or spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. (h) Community centers. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, or one space for each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater. (i) Churches and other religious institutions. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly, plus spaces for other church facilities which are used concurrently with the largest place of assembly, the number of Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 4 which shall be determined by the council in connection with the granting of a conditional use permit. (j) Theaters (except within shopping centers), stadiums, auditoriums, arenas, lodge halls, mortuaries, and clubhouses. Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. (k) Governmental administration, public service, post office. The greater of one space: (1) Per employee on the major shift, plus one space per government-owned vehicle, plus ten visitor spaces; or (2) For each 200 250 square feet of gross floor area. (l) Libraries, art galleries. Ten spaces, plus one space for each 300 square feet of gross floor area. (m) Medical or dental offices, clinics and animal hospitals. One space for each 200 300 square feet of gross floor area, plus one space per physician, dentist or veterinarian. (n) Hospitals. One space per bed for each two patient beds, plus one space per employee or volunteer on the major shift. (o) Athletic, health and weight reduction facilities. (1) Six Four spaces per court for handball, racquetball, and tennis courts. (2) One space per 200 400 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. (p) Restaurants (except within shopping centers). Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, One space for each 100 square feet of indoor floor area, plus one space for each employee on the major shift and one space for each loading dock. (q) Carwashes. One space per employee on the major shift, plus five spaces for each wash lane, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (r) Accessory carwashes. Two parking spaces, plus stacking spaces in accordance with section 36-1264. (s) Gas stations. One space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. (t) Automobile service centers. Three parking spaces per service bay, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space for each 100 300 square feet of accessory retail uses in excess of 500 square feet exclusive of restrooms, storage areas and mechanical equipment. (u) Bowling alleys. Five spaces per lane. (v) Offices, medical and dental laboratories, business or professional offices, financial institutions, employment agencies and travel bureaus. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 5 Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.00025*GFA)+195] Over 220,000 GFA/250 One space per 300 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. (w) Mixed Development District. (1) Residential. One enclosed space, plus 0.75 exposed space, per dwelling unit. 1.0spaces per dwelling unit minimum with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit. (2) Nonresidential. Excluding publicly owned facilities and uses accessory to residential uses: Shall be regulated per Section 36-1311 above. Gross Floor Area (GFA) (in square feet) Number of Spaces 0—20,000 GFA/200 20,001—220,000 GFA/[(0.0005*GFA)+190] Over 220,000 GFA/300 (3) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a commercial restaurant, the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant in conformity with the requirements of section 36-xxx. (4) Where there is combined within a single building an office use and a residential use, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit. (5) Where there is combined within a single building an office use, a residential use, and a commercial restaurant, up to 40% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the residential use, provided that the number of spaces required for residential parking shall never be less than one (1) parking space per dwelling unit, and up to 30% of the parking supplied to meet the requirement for the office use may also be used to meet the requirement for the commercial restaurant. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 6 (x) Multitenant industrial buildings. One space for each 400 500 square feet of gross floor area, or the sum of the component gross floor areas as follows, whichever is greater: (1) One space for each 200 300 square feet of office space. (2) One space for each 2,000 square feet of warehouse space. (3) One space for each 300 square feet of manufacturing, processing, packaging, treatment and assembly space. (4) One space for each 500 square feet of space containing machines and equipment for conducting scientific research, testing or experimentation. (5) One space for each 200 400 square feet of facilities for athletic, health and weight reduction purposes; six spaces per court for handball, racquetball or tennis. (y) Automobile and boat sales, new or used. One space per 250 square feet of gross floor area, including showrooms, sales space and offices, but excluding service areas, plus three spaces for each service bay. Required parking spaces shall not be used for the storage or display of vehicles, boats or other products. (z) Furniture and major appliance sales. (1) Over 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. (2) Under 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. One space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. (aa) Hotels and motels. One space per guest unit, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. (bb) Taproom and cocktail room. One space per 40 square feet of gross floor area. (cc) Brewery, winery and distillery without on-site sales. One space per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. (dd) Brewpub, brewery, winery and distillery with on-site sales. One space per 1,000 gross square feet of production floor area, and spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift for the restaurant. (ee) Uses not Specified. Where ambiguity exists in the application of off-street parking requirements, or where the parking requirements for a use are not specifically defined herein, the parking requirements for such use shall be determined by the city planner or the city planner designee and such determination shall be based upon the requirements for the most comparable use specified in this chapter. Section 2 Sec. 36-1312. - Planned Commercial District. Shall be amended as follows: For uses allowed in the Planned Commercial District, except uses for which a parking quantity is otherwise specified, the minimum spaces are as follows: (1) Planned Commercial District – 1 (PCD-1) (Areas include: 70th and Cahill, ValleyView/Wooddale, 44th and France) Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 7 Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. (2) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (50th and France, area defined in the 50th and France small area plan) Parking for uses in the 50th and France commercial node may rely on the City Parking Ramps with a floor area ratio up to 1.0. Uses exceeding 1.0 must provide additional off-street parking spaces for the square footage above 1.0. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. (3) Planned Commercial District – 2 (PCD-2) (Grandview, area defined in the Grandview Development Framework) Retail. Eight spaces for the first 1,000 square feet, plus six spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of the original 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet, plus five spaces for each 1,000 square feet in excess of 15,000 square feet. One (1) space per 250 square feet. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Office. One space per 350 square feet plus one space for a loading zone dock minimum with a maximum of one space per 200 square feet. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 8 (4) Planned Commercial District – 3 (PCD-3) (Property zoned PCD-3 within the Greater Southdale area as defined in the Southdale District Plan) Shopping centers (6+ businesses and at least 25,000 s.f.). One space per 200 350 square feet of gross floor area (including theaters and restaurants), plus one additional space for each ten seats in a restaurant, theater or other place of assembly. Atrium areas and mall areas, not used for retail sales purposes, shall be excluded from gross floor area calculations. Multiresidential uses. One fully enclosed parking space for each dwelling unit minimum, with a maximum of 1.5 spaces per unit, except that dwelling units with a floor area in excess of 1,500 square feet must provide 1.50 fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. Such parking spaces must be designed for the exclusive use of residents of the dwelling units and their guests. The council may require the provision of exposed parking spaces in addition to the required enclosed spaces as a condition to the issuance of a conditional use permit. Section 3 Sec. 36-1324. Parking Space Reductions Section 36-1324 is amended to add the following: Reductions. The following off-street parking reductions may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: (1) The required aggregate number of spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent (10%) if the building is located within 800 feet of a qualified transit stop. To qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week until at least 11 pm each day and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. (2) Car-share Parking. A reduction of up to one space or five percent of the overall number of required parking spaces, whichever is greater, may be granted for any development that provides at least three reserved parking spaces for use by car-share vehicles. Parking for car-share vehicles may be provided in any required or non- required off-street parking space. (3) Environmental Sustainability. With the consent of the city planner or the planner’s designee upon review of potential adverse impacts, a reduction of up to ten percent (10%) in parking requirements may be approved for parking areas composed of pervious pavement or where the reduced parking area is used for a low impact development storm water facility; and a reduction of up to twenty percent (20%) in parking requirements may be approved for clustered site design where the reduced parking area is used for tree retention or native landscaping. (4) A 10 percent reduction in parking provided if the following is provided for the following: (a) 1 covered, long-term bike space per 3 dwelling units. (b) 1 covered, long-term bike space per 5,000 s.f. of retail/service uses. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 9 (c) 1 short-term bike space per 5,000 s.f. of retail/services uses. In order to qualify for this reduction, the long-term bicycle parking must: (a) Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; (b) Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; (c) Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock; Section 4 Sec. 36-1325. Additional Parking Regulations. Section 36-1325 is amended to add the following: Shared parking requirements for restaurants in the Planned Commercial District – 1 (PCD-1) (Areas include: 70th and Cahill, ValleyView/Wooddale, 44th and France). (a) Two or more different use classifications within one or more tracts that are not used for or restricted to single-family residential purposes may share parking spaces to reduce the overall parking space requirement as provided in this section. This section shall not be used to reduce the number of required bicycle spaces or loading berths. (b) The following formula and table shall be used to determine the adjustment, if any, of the minimum number of parking spaces required by this chapter in the Planned Commercial District – 1 (PCD-1) (Areas include: 70th and Cahill, ValleyView/Wooddale, 44th and France): (1) Determine the number of parking spaces required by this chapter for each use classification individually; (2) Multiply the number derived from item (1) of this subsection for each individual use classification by the corresponding percentage listed in the rows of the table found in this subsection for each time period found in the columns of the table; (3) Add the numbers derived from item (2) of this subsection for each time period found in the columns of the table. This is the column total for each column; and (4) Determine the largest column total. This is the shared parking space requirement. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 10 Class Type of Use Typical Weekday Typical Weekend/Holiday Mid- night to 7 AM 7 AM to 5 PM 5 PM to 9 PM 9 PM to Mid- night Mid- night to 7 AM 7 AM to 5 PM 5 PM to 9 PM 9 PM to Mid- night Class: Food and Beverage Small restaurant 10% 50% 75% 40% 15% 75% 100% 50% Neighborhood restaurant 10% 50% 75% 40% 15% 75% 100% 50% Restaurant 10% 50% 75% 40% 15% 75% 100% 50% Tavern or pub 0% 0% 25% 75% 0% 10% 80% 100% (c) Upon written request of the applicant supported by information adequate to make a determination, the city planner may approve an additional reduction of up to 10 percent of the required number of shared parking spaces after considering all relevant factors, including: (1) The unique parking characteristics of each use classification, including employee, customer, and patron parking demand, hours of operation, and projected convenience and frequency of use of the shared parking. (2) Whether the use of shared parking spaces will be injurious to public health, safety, and welfare including, but not limited to, whether the additional reduction of shared parking spaces will cause increased traffic congestion, potential harm to adjacent property owners, and spillover parking into surrounding residential neighborhoods; and (3) The recommendation of the director of public works. (e) All shared parking spaces must conform to the following criteria: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 11 (1) A shared parking space shall not be reserved for or restricted to a specific use classification. A parking space reserved for a specific use classification shall not be considered a shared parking space; (2) All shared and reserved parking spaces shall be identified on a site plan; (3) Each shared parking space shall be clearly identified by signage on each tract and parking facility identifying the location and availability of the shared parking spaces for participating uses; (4) Each shared parking space must be made available at all times for use by employees, customers, and patrons; and (5) Shared parking spaces that are located on off-site parking facilities must comply with the provisions of section 36-xxxx of this Code for each individual use classification. (f) The city planner shall not approve a site plan that proposes to use shared parking spaces unless the applicant or responsible party submits a shared parking agreement to the department that takes the form of a memorandum of lease or a reciprocal easement agreement in a form approved by the city attorney. The shared parking agreement shall comply with the requirements of a memorandum of lease contained in section 36-501 of this Code. (g) After the city planner approves a site plan that uses shared parking spaces, any change in the use classification or parking factor shall require the applicant or responsible party to submit a new site plan to the department for approval and a revised shared parking agreement if necessary. The building official shall not issue a building permit or certificate of occupancy without a site plan approved by the city planner for the revised shared parking agreement. (h) Operation of a use classification without an approved site plan required by this subsection is a violation of this chapter. Sec. 36-xxx. - Off-site parking. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 12 (a) A parking space required by this chapter may be provided on off-site parking facilities if the following conditions are met: (1) The off-site parking facilities are located less than 500 feet from the tract where the use classification is located except as provided for in items (2) and (3) of this subsection; (2) Up to 25 percent of the required number of parking spaces may be provided on off-site parking facilities located: a. Less than 800 feet from a tract where the use classification is located if the building for which the off-site parking is being provided contains less than 30,000 square feet of GFA; or b. Less than 1,000 feet from a tract where the use classification is located if: (1) The building for which the off-site parking is being provided contains less than 30,000 square feet of GFA; and (2) The city planner determines in his or her sole professional judgment that sufficient pedestrian amenities mitigate the impact of the extended distance of the off-site parking facilities. (3) The off-site parking spaces required by this chapter are not already being used to satisfy the parking requirement of a different building or tract. (b) All distances shall be measured as the shortest clearly delineated pedestrian route between the property boundary of the tract where the use classification is located to the property boundary of the off-site parking facility as measured along sidewalks and other passageways that are open and accessible to the public at all times. (c) When an off-site parking facility is located on a tract that is not owned by an applicant or responsible party for the property requiring the parking spaces, the applicant or responsible party shall provide to the department a memorandum of lease that complies with the requirements of section 36-501 of this chapter. (d) Different requirements for off-site parking facilities may be provided for within a special parking area in accordance with this chapter. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 13 Sec. 36-501. - Memorandum of lease. (a) A memorandum of lease required by this chapter shall: (1) Be in the form prescribed by the city planner upon approval by the city attorney and shall not require that the amount of consideration paid or other financial information be reported to the department; (2) Be filed with the department and maintained in the department’s records. (3) Be accompanied by the non-refundable fee set forth for this provision in the city fee schedule; (4) Be signed by all interested parties; (5) Include the legal description of the leased tract; (6) Provide that the leased tract will be used primarily to satisfy the parking requirements of this chapter for the term of the lease or agreement; and (7) Be evidence of an effective lease or shared parking agreement with an effective term of at least one year. (b) In the event that the leased tract becomes unavailable to the use classification whether through termination of the lease, agreement, or other reason, the applicant or responsible party must immediately notify the planning department and take steps to obtain and submit for approval substitute parking arrangements that comply with the requirements of this chapter. The city planner shall cause the certificate of occupancy of an applicant or responsible party to be revoked after the expiration of the grace period set forth below if the applicant or responsible party is not in compliance with the requirements of this chapter due to the unavailability of the leased tract in accordance with the following: (1) If the applicant or responsible party has not made substitute arrangements within a 90-day grace period after the date the leased tract became unavailable, the city planner shall cause the certificate of occupancy to be revoked for the use and that use shall cease immediately. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 14 Expiration of a lease at the end of its term without substitute parking arrangements shall not be considered as no fault of the applicant or responsible party. (2) If an applicant or responsible party can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the city planner that the leased tract became unavailable through no fault of the applicant or responsible party, the grace period to submit substitute arrangements and have them approved shall be 120 days from the date the leased tract became unavailable. If no substitute arrangements are approved within the grace period, the city planner shall cause the certificate of occupancy to be revoked for the use and that use shall cease immediately. (3) The city planner shall grant an additional 120-day extension to the grace period to an applicant or responsible party who can demonstrate the following to the satisfaction of the city planner: a. The applicant or responsible party has acted in good faith and made reasonable efforts to obtain substitute parking; b. The applicant or responsible party will have reasonable opportunity to obtain substitute parking if an extension is granted; and c. The granting of an extension will not be injurious to the public health, safety, and welfare; (4) The commission shall grant an additional 90-day extension to the grace period to an applicant who demonstrates to the satisfaction of the commission the criteria of item (3) of this subsection. An application to the commission for the additional 90-day extension shall: a. Be filed with the department before the expiration of the grace period described by this section; b. Be in the form prescribed by the city planner; and c. Be accompanied by the non-refundable fee set forth for this provision in the city fee schedule. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 15 (5) Operation of a use classification after the expiration of the grace period without providing for substitute parking arrangements approved by the city planner is a violation of this chapter. (c) An applicant or responsible party must submit an annual certification to the department not more than one year from the date of the most recently approved site plan or memorandum of lease demonstrating the continued availability of the leased tract. The annual certification shall: (1) Be in the form prescribed by the city planner; (2) Be accompanied by the non-refundable fee set forth for this provision in the city fee schedule; and (3) Include a current and valid memorandum of lease that complies with the standards of subsection (a) of this section showing that the leased tract is available for continued use as shown on the most recently approved site plan. (d) If an applicant or responsible party fails to submit an annual certification to the department, the leased tract shall be considered to be unavailable for the parking purpose intended by the lease and the applicant or responsible party shall take the steps outlined in subsection (b) of this section required for compliance with this chapter. Section 5. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 12, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : P reliminary R ezoning from P C D-3 to P UD at 4040 70th S treet West Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he P lanning Commission is asked to consider a redevelopment of 4040 West 70th S treet. T he applicant, Ecumen and Lupe D evelopment P artners, would tear down the existing office building and construct a new three-four story 118 senior affordable housing project with 86 underground and 23 surface parking stalls. (See attached plans and narrative.) AT TAC HME N T S: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 5-6-21 Noon Planning Commission Staff Report - May 12, 2021 Staff Memo: Engineering/Sustainability Staff Memo: Trans portation Planner, May 6, 2021 Staff Memo: Building and Fire Marshall, May 5, 2021 Applicant Narrative and Plans Zoning, Height Overlay and Comp. Plan Land Use Designation Des ign Experience Guidelines - Related Pages Southdale Dis trict Plan - Related Pages Traffic and parking study AFO, Architectural Field Office Review (Mic Johnson) PUD Ordinance (PUD-22) Shadow Study (Existing) Shadow Study (Propos ed) Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 06 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments-4040 W 70th St Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial Development, to PUD, Planned Unit Development, at 4040 W 70th Street VISITORS 42 CONTRIBUTORS 25 RESPONSES 25 5 Registered 0 Unverified 20 Anonymous 5 Registered 0 Unverified 20 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Kvpt Email:kkveitpt@gmail.com Responded At:May 05, 2021 06:05:56 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 13:00:56 pm IP Address:66.41.85.255 Q1.First and Last Name Kelly Veit Q2.Address 6809 Cornelia Dr Q3.Comment Of all the proposed and currently constructed projects in Southdale area, this one actually makes sense and brings needed value to the area. The design is thoughtful and not intrusive to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal of affordable senior housing is spot on. The developer was engaging with the community and took suggestions constructively. I support this project. My only negative is that the proposed plan at 70th and France with the addition of a turning lane will affect the walkability of this project. Respondent No:2 Login:4501 Email:a1superwriter@gmail.com Responded At:May 05, 2021 08:31:42 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 15:05:42 pm IP Address:75.168.87.168 Q1.First and Last Name Mike Ebnet Q2.Address 4501 Claremore Court Q3.Comment Good place for people who have no friends to visit them and who don't have anywhere to go! There is just not enough parking. Only 69 underground for 117 units. 11 surface spots are not enough for visitors. If residents don't have a car, that means relatives and friends or Uber, who will come to pick them up and take them places or to visit, will need a place to park. What about food delivery? Those vehicles will all come in the same time period. Too many seniors will find that they are isolated to their block. I walk to Byerly's and find crossing and walking on France Ave to be unpleasant at best. Cars travel fast and close. Wait time to cross is long and you feel like you have to hustle. Cars on Valley View are also too close to sidewalk for the speed they travel. In short, walking is not going to be enjoyable unless you do a better job of separating slow seniors and fast cars. Photo on bettertogether site looks like there are more car stalls than what I've seen previously. Still too few. In short, add more places for the cars of residents and guests and make it less harrowing to walk to Centennial Lakes and Rosland. Respondent No:3 Login:Michele Grams Email:mhofmanngrams@kinderbe rryhill.com Responded At:May 05, 2021 09:45:09 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 15:56:28 pm IP Address:75.149.156.153 Q1.First and Last Name Michele Hofmann Grams Q2.Address 3950 West 70th St Q3.Comment This development, if approved, will have a significant negative impact on our early learning child development center.. It will tower over our school limiting natural light from entering our windows. Children need access to natural light in order to thrive. I am also worried about that the increased traffic congestion will pose a safety risk to our staff, families and children. Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:04:41 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:04:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Larisa Sioris Q2.Address 7004 Lanham Lane Q3.Comment I have two children that attend the neighboring childcare facility, Kinderberry Hill. The size of this development is too large and will block the natural light that is so beneficial to the development of my kids. Imagine the excitement of a child that is able to go play outside, only to be striped of the warmth and joy sunshine on your face can bring. I whole heartedly do not support this proposal. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:09:41 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:09:41 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name April Guba Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St Edina MN 55435 Q3.Comment This development, if approved, will have a significant negative impact on our early learning child development school. It will tower over our school limiting natural light from entering our windows or shining on our playground. It could also lower temperatures outside limiting the time children can spend outside. Children need access to natural light in order to thrive. I am also worried about that the increased traffic congestion will pose a safety risk to our staff, families and children. We already have problems multiple times a day with individuals driving the wrong way through our parking lot and driving to fast. This increased traffic could be a hazard to children outside, but also will cause more congestion on 70th St. 70th St is already hard to enter and exit due to high traffic levels. This extra traffic will increase the amount of accidents on 70th St. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:16:37 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:16:37 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Julia Pozo Q2.Address 7113 Lanham Lane Q3.Comment We are concerned about traffic and the fact that this building will block the sunlight to the daycare next door. The health of the kids is very important and another tall building should not override the needs of a business that has been there for years. Please do not rezone this land, or if you do, limit the height of the building to prevent it from blocking the sunlight at Kinderberry Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:20:39 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:20:39 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kirsten Walstien Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St, Edina, MN Q3.Comment Our child attends the daycare next door and I have concerns over the amount of natural sunlight this proposed development will block from the daycare center, and would ask that to be taken into consideration. Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:22:20 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:22:20 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name bob and Q2.Address 6933 Southdale Rd Q3.Comment This project is less than 100' from our property. (see 2 enclosures emailed to MJ Lamom) Our home was built in 1955 and the current bldg at 4040 70th was built in the 70's. (notice the size of bldg and how close it is to our neighborhood) Our neighborhood has endured the negativity of this bldg all through the years: bright lights shining into our homes from parking lot lights, and looking at a totally lit- up bldg all night right before our face! we are voting NO on on rezoning to a PUD. which may bring future structure even closer to our property with heights looking straight down on our property. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:33:13 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 10:33:13 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name K Plosser Q2.Address 6108 Eden Prairie Rd Q3.Comment My children are in the daycare behind your complex. This massive building will block my kiddos natural light which they NEED for healthy development. Please reconsider! Respondent No:10 Login:Jill Dunkley Email:jdunkley@nhacademy.net Responded At:May 05, 2021 10:51:59 am Last Seen:May 03, 2021 22:31:33 pm IP Address:50.236.42.130 Q1.First and Last Name Jill Dunkley Q2.Address Kinderberry Hill, 3950 70th Street W, Edina, MN 55435 Q3.Comment I am writing in opposition to the proposed senior living project - 4040 W 70th Street. This project will have a substantial negative impact on our Kinderberry Hill early learning child development school where we have been serving Edina families since 1990. This project will be extremely close to our Kinderberry Hill Edina school and will tower over our school limiting natural light from entering our classrooms. Children need access to natural light in order to thrive. I am also worried that the increased traffic congestion will pose a safety risk to our staff, families and children. As such, I respectfully request that you deny the project and do not grant any set back or height variances. Thank you for your consideration Jill Dunkley Executive Vice President - Kinderberry Hill jdunkley@nhacademy.net 763-383-6282 Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 11:11:39 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 11:11:39 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jamison Galloway Q2.Address 6309 Brookview Ave, Edina 55424 Q3.Comment This project would put Kinderberry Hill squarely in the shade, depriving those students of natural sunlight. For that alone I do not support the project and hope others will see how detrimental it would be to very important existing structures and businesses. Respondent No:12 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 11:17:07 am Last Seen:May 05, 2021 11:17:07 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Katie Troldahl Q2.Address 6515 Josephine Avenue Q3.Comment As a parent with children at the Kinderberry Hill near this proposed development we have concerns with the size and location of this proposal. It would impair the children’s activities and specifically would block natural light to the building/windows and block sun to the playgrounds, outdoor space and gardens. For these reasons as parents and local residents we would object to this proposal. Please direct any questions to Kinderberry. We fully support their objection and support the care they provide and have provided to many children in the community. Respondent No:13 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 12:03:36 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 12:03:36 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kelly Kempf Q2.Address 7332 West Shore Drive Q3.Comment We currently have a child enrolled at Kinderberry Hill (and another child on the way who will start there next year), which is the preschool and daycare center located directly next to this property. We have significant concerns about the building size blocking the natural light that goes into our child's classroom, as well as the playgrounds. Natural light is essential for child development and it is concerning that this new building would take all of that away from Kinderberry's current property. Not only do all, but 3, of the classroom windows face this potential new building, but the outdoor playgrounds both also would be affected by the size of the buildings. Kinderberry provides an exceptional learning environment for children and a wonderful community for local families. I would hate for this new building to take away the value they currently provide the Edina community and our young children. I can't imagine all of the children ages 0-5 playing outside in a completely shaded playground that used to be sunny, all due to re-development. Please keep the needs of these young children in mind when making decisions about the re-development of this property. We also live close enough to be able to walk to pick up our daughter, weather permitting, and I would hope that any new development next door to Kinderberry would be designed to keep the area walkable, safe and pedestrian friendly. We have significant concerns about the increase of traffic with 118 units and the ability for West 70th to remain pedestrian friendly, especially with the roundabout right next to it and having to cross the street at the roundabout. Thank you! Respondent No:14 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 13:11:13 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 13:11:13 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Melissa Burns Q2.Address 5904 Zenith Ave S, Edina MN Q3.Comment Hello, concerned that the size of this building will completely overshadow the neighboring buildings 1 being a daycare/school that greatly benefits from having access to natural sun and light. Kids get limited sunshine being indoors so much especially in winter I’d hate to further depreciate that benefit for them. Thank you Melissa Burns Respondent No:15 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 13:23:56 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 13:23:56 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Anthony Kempf Q2.Address 7332 West Shore Drive Q3.Comment I have serious concerns about what this rezoning proposal would bring in terms of increased traffic due to the 118 units. Currently, without those additional residents, there is steady traffic due to 70th street being a busy thoroughfare from France Ave to Highway 100 - the quality of life would decrease for those of us who live in the area. On top of that, there is Cornelia Elementary down the street and Kinderberry Daycare center right next door, and the increased traffic also brings in safety questions for the kids at both places. Lastly, in the rendering of the proposed building above, I noticed that the Kinderberry building is nowhere in sight as the building completely engulfs it and prevents any sunlight from hitting the building and playgrounds. I do not want to get into the benefits here, but natural sunlight for children of the 0-5 ages is essential for their development. This area is currently zoned as a commercial district, let's not change that and allow a multi-family building in an area that is not equipped for it from a traffic standpoint or wanted by the local taxpayers of the community. Let's make Edina better together and reject this proposal, thank you. Respondent No:16 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 13:28:55 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 13:28:55 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Hilary Dolan Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St Q3.Comment I strongly oppose this project due to the negative impacts it would have on the children at the existing and well established early childhood education center in the adjacent lot. Extensive research has shown that children, especially those under the age of five, who are exposed to natural light have fewer negative social behaviors and their circadian rhythm and therefore sleep quality is positively impacted. Natural light also promotes the formation of new synapses and therefore the ability to learn - at a time when the brain is growing and learning exponentially, we cannot afford to limit children's exposure to natural light by this new proposed building. Respondent No:17 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 14:03:51 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 14:03:51 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Philip Mumm Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St Q3.Comment This building will block the sunlight to Kinderberry Hill where we have 1 (and soon 2) children learning every day. The natural light is very important for the children and so I think this building would have a negative impact on the daycare and the children who attend daily to play and learn. Respondent No:18 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 14:23:39 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 14:23:39 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James and Ann Makres Q2.Address 4912 W 69th Street Q3.Comment We are very concerned about the development on 70th and Valley View. Set backs are way too short. Second, there are 118 units but only 69 underground parking spaces and 11 surface spaces. I realize these are senior units but most seniors drive (we are 77 and 74 and we certainly drive our own cars.} Also seniors have relatives that visit, where do they park.? Generally the surface slots are used for visitors. That would leave 49 units without underground parking. This will be a real strain on the neighbors. Please do not approve this plan. Respondent No:19 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 15:00:20 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 15:00:20 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Caren Zhao and Andy Feldman Q2.Address 3800 W 57th Street, Edina MN 55410 Q3.Comment Our two kids go to the Kinderberry Hill Edina campus. But recently we've heard that a new senior center project is being planned, which will be a big building that will block the sun for our little ones. We wanted to contribute our opinion to this matter and hope that this project either get a design update to lower the height/size of it so it won't block the important sunshine to all the kids in the daycare, or just not build such a big building in front of it. Thanks, Caren and Andy Respondent No:20 Login:amyhertelbuckley Email:amyhertelbuckley@gmail.co m Responded At:May 05, 2021 17:47:49 pm Last Seen:May 06, 2021 00:43:03 am IP Address:208.87.237.201 Q1.First and Last Name Amy Buckley Q2.Address 5309 Wooddale Avenue; Edina MN 55424 Q3.Comment I am writing to express concern that this development, as proposed, will block natural light into my daughter's school (Kinderberry Hill) and that the construction will cause disruption and debris to the school's only outdoor area, which is a crucially important part of child development, and is used daily for health and education. I urge the City to reconsider this plan, decline the proposal and/or provide significant mitigation measures to eliminate the harm to the nearby school. Thank you. Respondent No:21 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 18:20:14 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 18:20:14 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Mohamed Abdihalim Q2.Address 5616 Concord ave Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment My 3 year old son goes to Kinderberry Hill daycare which is located right next to this site. We have a concern about the height of this proposed building. It will block the natural sunlight to to the daycare. Natural sunlight is extremely important to the well being of young children and thus will have negative impact on our community. Respondent No:22 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 05, 2021 18:58:08 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 18:58:08 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Kristina Norton Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St, Edina, MN 55435 Q3.Comment If this development is approved, it will have a negative impact on the Kinderberry Hill Child Development Center. The increase in traffic will pose a safety risk for families and staff. The complex will also block the natural light coming through the windows, which can have an impact on child development, too. Respondent No:23 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 05:29:14 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 05:29:14 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ben Dreher Q2.Address 5600 Kellogg Pl. Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment The proposed design and height of the facilities appears that it will block the natural sunlight from the west facing direction in the afternoon. This is critical for the development of you children at the adjacent Kinderberry Daycare center. Please consider the growth and development of our future generations. Respondent No:24 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 07:38:54 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 07:38:54 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Danielle Gerster Q2.Address 6516 Josephine Ave Q3.Comment Hello, While the building looks nice the size would effect the daycare sitting right there. Our kids love to be outside playing in the sun each day on the playground and the outdoor classroom which also has gardens for the kids to learn about plants and growing. Please consider that we do not need another large/tall complex in Edina. I am not opposed to the project, just the size. Thank you Respondent No:25 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:May 06, 2021 08:27:01 am Last Seen:May 06, 2021 08:27:01 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sarah Mumm Q2.Address 3950 W 70th St., Edina, MN Q3.Comment Please reconsider the location of this senior living facility. My children attend Kinderberry Hill and this structure will block the natural light for the children. May 12, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial-3 District to PUD, Planned Unit Development at 4040 70th Street West Information / Background: The Planning Commission is asked to consider a redevelopment of 4040 West 70th Street. The applicant, Ecumen and Lupe Development Partners, would tear down the existing office building and construct a new three-four story 118 senior affordable housing project with 86 underground and 23 surface parking stalls. (See attached plans and narrative.) The site is currently zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District. Multi-family residential uses are conditionally permitted within this PCD District. The request would require the following: 1. A Rezoning to PUD to ensure long term affordable housing. Flexibility in setbacks and floor area ratio would be included. The property is 1.58 acres in size. This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as OR, Office Residential. The site has a height limit of 4 stories and 48 feet. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan/Southdale District Plan which limits the density to 75 units per acre for this site. There were several comments made on Better Together Edina in regard to concern over the 4-story height and proximity to the day care to the east, and the potential to cast shadows on the site. Therefore, the applicant is doing a shadow study which will be presented at the Planning Commission Meeting. The applicant went through a sketch plan review before the Planning Commission and City Council. To address issues raised during that review, the applicant has revised the plans. The revisions include: A pedestrian connection is proposed from the main lobby area to the public sidewalk along Valley View Road. STAFF REPORT Page 2 A pedestrian connection is proposed from the northwest wing of the building to the public sidewalk along Valley View Road. A pedestrian connection is proposed form the southeast corner of the building to the public sidewalk along W 70th Street. The public sidewalk fronting the development along Valley View Road and W 70th Street will be widened from 6 feet to 8 feet. Shifted the building back from 70th Street to meet the required setback. Improved Architecture. Exterior building color has been darkened from white to light gray. This will reduce the wall albedo on the East and West facades where the sun angles are the lowest. The building’s East façade has been given further articulation to create visual interest and provide a more human scale. To achieve the desired building massing, thin brick/stone is to be used where Masonry is denoted on the elevations. Exterior materials have been adjusted to incorporate a higher percentage of glass, and reduce the overall quantity of fiber cement. Improved Landscaping. Reduced lighting SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office Building; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Office Residential. Easterly: Day Care; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided Office Residential. Southerly: Duplex; zoned R-2, Two Dwelling Unit District, and Office Residential. Westerly: Single-family homes; Zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.58 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains a 2.5 story office building. building. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential (20-75 units per acre) Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District PUD Rezoning The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this site to PUD, Planned Unit Development District to allow affordable housing on the site and flexibility in setbacks, FAR and building height. (See attached draft PUD Ordinance.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 Within a PUD District, the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent of the PUD. Below is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the existing PCD-3 Standards on the lot. Note that the proposed use would be allowed in the existing PCD-3 District. Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-3) Proposed Lot line Building Setbacks Front – Valley View Front – 70th Street Side – North Rear – East 35 feet (to the curb) 35 feet (to the curb) 45 feet (based on height) 45 feet (based on height) 50 feet 40 feet 10 feet* 10 feet* Building Height 4-stories & 48 feet 3-4 stories & 45 feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 1.3%* Density (Southdale District Plan) 20-75 units per acre 75 units per acre (100% of the units affordable) Parking Housing – 1 enclosed space per unit = 118 spaces required (additional spaces may be required) 109 spaces proposed* Per Chapter 36 of the City Code the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; STAFF REPORT Page 4 b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The project would provide a transition area from the single-family residential district to the west to the commercial area to the west. Senior housing would generate less traffic than the existing office building on the site during the peak travel times. Most notably, the project provides affordable housing. The PUD Ordinance is the tool that allows the City to maintain affordable housing on the site. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Title shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The use proposed here is allowed under the existing zoning district. Wenck Associates did a parking and traffic analysis that determined that the proposed parking would support the uses proposed, and the traffic generated would be supported by the existing roads, with no STAFF REPORT Page 5 improvements required. (See attached study.) Senior housing would generate less traffic than the existing use during peak travel times. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposal would not include a mixture of land uses. However, it would include affordable housing. The project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned above, the proposed uses would be for housing that is all affordable. Providing affordable housing and sustainable development are goals within the Comprehensive Plan that this project would accomplish. Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives include: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences of the current and future Edina community. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Pedestrian and streetscape amenities. Encourage or require structured parking. Buildings may “step down" in height from intersections. • Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets to create pedestrian scale. Buildings may “step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back" from street. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and STAFF REPORT Page 6 The proposed building density would be 75 units per acre and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site has adequate utilities capacity; the use would generate less traffic than the existing office; would provide affordable housing; Staff believes the density is appropriate for this site, given the affordable senior housing proposed. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The proposed project does require variances from the already established standards in the PCD District. Flexibility is requested in regard to setbacks and parking spaces. For the reasons stated above, staff believes the purpose and intend of the PUD Ordinance is met; most importantly the provision of 118 affordable housing units. Access/Site Circulation Vehicular access to the site would be from Valley View Road for both the small surface lot and drop off area and the underground parking. There would be no access from 70th Street. Traffic and Parking Study Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic study, which concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the proposed use, and there would be adequate parking. The parking study concludes the parking could still exceed capacity by 37 stalls. (See the attached parking and traffic study.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, the applicant is required to have 25 over story trees and a full complement of under story shrubs. The applicant is proposing 26 over story trees. They would include a mixture of Spruce, Maple, Birch, and Linden. A full complement of understory landscaping is proposed around the buildings. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: STAFF REPORT Page 7 a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist, or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The subject property is currently bordered by 5-foot boulevard-style sidewalks along Valley View Rd to the west and West 70th Street to the south. Five-foot boulevard-style sides exist on both sides of 70th St between Highway 100 and York Ave. On-street bike lanes are also present on 70th Street adjacent to the site (dedicated lanes west of Valley View Rd and shared lanes between Valley View Rd and France Ave). The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018) recommends dedicated bike lanes on W 70th St between Valley View and France Ave; this recommended facility is not proposed for construction in the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. The sidewalk on 70th would be widened. Bicycle parking would be required to meet the above standards and recommendations of the transportation planner. (See attached transportation planner memo.) The site is also in the vicinity of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus service. CloverRide is a reliable, continuous transportation service providing accessibility from senior housing locations to amenities like groceries, retail, and recreation in the Southdale district. The service runs Fridays from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. and costs $3 per day. Although the bus primarily follows a fixed route, riders within two blocks of the route can request special pick-ups or drop-offs. 4040 Valley View Rd is only one block west of the fixed route. (See the route on page 3 of the Transportation Planners memo.) STAFF REPORT Page 8 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be generally acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached review memo. Drainage would be directed to the west with rain gardens along Valley View Road and an underground system in the parking lot. (See attached grading plan.) A Site Improvement Performance Agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks, utilities and any other public improvements. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The applicant is proposing the building to be made of architectural cast stone, fiber cement and metal siding. (See attached renderings.) Density The proposal is to develop 118 units on this 1.58-acre parcel. The proposed density would be 75 units per acre which would be on the high end of range allowed in the small area plan. Staff believes the density is justified due to the fact that the project would provide 100% of the units to be affordable. Sustainability The applicant is providing solar panels on the roof. This location is rated as “good” for solar roof installations by the University of Minnesota (score is 81 of 100) and can reach up to 99 degrees F during extreme heat events, roughly 10 degrees hotter than surrounding areas. Staff recommends installing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations for a minimum of 5% (6 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (11 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. EV charging stations should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed Rezoning to PUD reasonable to develop this site? Yes. The proposed plans are reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is consistent with the Southdale District Plan regarding height, use and density. The proposed development would serve as a transition from the single-family district to the west to the Southdale commercial area. Three-stories are proposed on the west side, stepping up to four stories. STAFF REPORT Page 9 2. The proposed project with 118 units, would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provide affordable housing. b. Create a more efficient and creative use of the property and would create an improved transition from the single-family neighborhood to west to the Southdalke Commercial area to the west. c. The majority of the parking is under the building. d. Enhance landscaping and green space. Extensive landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the site and adjacent to the proposed townhomes. e. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact and parking study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and the proposed parking. The project would generate less traffic than the existing use on the site during peak travel times. Options for Consideration Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Affordable housing is identified as a need in the Comprehensive Plan; and the proposed amendment would assist the City in meeting its established affordable housing goal with the Met Council of providing 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. This project would include 118 new affordable housing units toward that goal. 2. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and meets the criteria for a PUD. 3. The proposed density of 75 units per acre is reasonable, and within the density range suggested in the Comprehensive Plan of between 20-75 units per acre. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and the proposed parking. STAFF REPORT Page 10 5. Project would meet the following additional Comprehensive Plan goals and objectives: a) Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. b) Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences of the current and future Edina community. c) Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. 6. The project would provide a transition area from the single-family residential district to the west to the Southdale commercial district to the east. Preliminary approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated April 12, 2021. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicants Sustainability Questionnaire. 3. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the fire marshal. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the building official and fire marshal memo dated May 5, 2019. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 6, 2019. 5. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the transportation planner’s memo dated May 6, 2019. 6. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 7. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Final Rezoning is subject to approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment establishing the PUD-22, Planned Unit Development-22 District on this site. 9. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit prior to issuance of a building permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 10. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Traffic Study recommendations. STAFF REPORT Page 11 12. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of the first building permit. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the proposed Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The purpose and intent of the proposed PUD has not been satisfied. The project is not mixed use. 2. The proposal does not meet the eligibility standards of the PUD Ordinance. 3. The building is too large for the site. The setbacks and FAR do not conform to the underlying PCD District standards. 4. There would not be adequate parking per the City’s parking requirements. 5. The four-story height of the building along with the setback of 10 feet to east lot line is not appropriate for the site. The building would cast shadows on the property to the east. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a city decision: August 4, 2021 DATE: 5/5/2021 TO: 4040 70th St W, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer RE: 4040 70th St W – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included survey, site plan, grading and drainage, utility, stormwater management plans dated April 12, 2021. Review Comment Required For General 1. Provide a copy of the sanitary sewer easements shown on the Land Title Survey. Sanitary sewer easements are required. No encroachments are allowed on easement areas. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks within the property line to be responsibility of property owner. Sidewalks in ROW along 70th St W and Valley View Rd are the City’s responsibility. City snowplowing operations are 5-ft wide on these sidewalks. If owner wants a wider path, snow removal greater than 5-ft would be the responsibility of the owner. General Comment Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit 4.2 Note the location of City fiber along the Valley View Rd ROW. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard. Applicant showing 8-ft wide is supported. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 8. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 9. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 10. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance construction/ relocation/ removal. Comply with standard plate 415. Indicate the radii; must be 15’. Note maximum width for 2-way entrance is 30’. Close up existing entrances, standard plate 500. Building Permit 11. Valley View Rd milled & overlaid in 2020. Road patching on Valley View Rd shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 525, 540, and 541. 70th St W reconstructed in 2011. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540 and 543. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 12. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. New hydrant required within 100’ of entrance. Comply with standard plate 100. Grading/Building Permit 13. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 14. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 15. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Note, preferred sanitary connection is the 9” VCP on the southwest corner of the site, not the 24” RCP trunk. Two existing connections to abandon at the main. Water is only available on 70th to south. Prior to Starting Utility Work 15.1 Sanitary service shall be planned for flood risk on trunk line. Use either an overhead sanitary service line with minimum service fixture opening 2’ above flood level, or backflow prevention. 15.2 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 15.3 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 16. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 17. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 18. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 19. Watermain installed 1958. Structure built in 1979. Well not likely Certificate of Occupancy onsite. The site has low vulnerability for infiltration and is not in wellhead management. zone. 20. Fire Department requires fire hydrant 100-ft from front entrance along Valley View Road. Floodplain 21. Site is directly upstream of the LE_34 and 36 (Southdale Rd, Valley View Rd, Dawson La) flood area. The 1%-annual chance flood elevation is 866.6’ and it sets the lowest opening elevation of 868.6’. Indicate the proposed lowest opening elevation. Grading/Building Permit Certificate of Occupancy 22. Per CWRMP Section 3.1.2.2 (2), construction of below-grade parking garages is permitted, provided the structure (including the parking garage) is flood proofed to two feet above the applicable 1-percent-annual-chance flood elevation in accordance with the following design standards: a. Together with associated utility and sanitary facilities, the structure must be designed so that below two feet above the 1%-annual-chance flood elevation the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. b. A Floodproofing Certificate and Inspection and Maintenance Plan must be provided by a registered professional engineer or architect. c. A floodproofing design that entails human intervention, such as the installation of flood gates or flood shields, will require a Flood Emergency Operation Plan Grading/Building Permit 23. Grading for south rain garden could be expanded to provide additional flood storage to benefit the downstream neighborhood. General Comment Storm Water Utility 24. Provide final, signed geotechnical report with soil borings. • Coordinate with City on excavations and temporary shoring to remove the unsuitable materials and provide adequate oversizing near the proposed SW building corner if it extends in 70th St W ROW. Grading/Building Permit 25. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 26. Hydraulic design must consider restricted tailwater condition in 10% and 1% annual exceedance events, City hydraulic model is available for developer review. Grading/Building Permit 27. Design must reduce peak flow and volume to subwatershed LE_43. Grading/Building Permit 28. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 29. Flow arrows shown on existing City storm sewer in the NW corner are incorrect. Flow west, not east. Grading/Building Permit 30. Label drainage areas PA-1 and PA-2 on Post-Development Drainage Map. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 31. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 32. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Minimize impacts to pedestrians by sequencing replacement (temporary or permanent) of the sidewalk within 48 hours of removal. Maintain access throughout construction. Grading/Building Permit 33. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Provide drawings and calculations signed by MN licensed civil engineer. Grading/Building Permit 34. Any short-term road closures shall be approved by the City Engineer. General Comment 35. Construction staging or construction fencing shall not impede the City’s ability to snowplow the adjacent streets. If construction fencing removes storage space for snow, developer shall be responsible for snow removal in the street adjacent to any impacts to City operations. General Comment Other Agency Coordination 36. Provide copies required permits (e.g., MDH, MPCA, and MCES) MPCA permit shall be closed out for permit closeout. Grading/Building Permit Certificate of Occupancy 37. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 38. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% (6 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (11 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 39. Site plan includes a bike storage room on the first floor. Staff recommends providing a minimum of one bike parking stall for every 10 residential units (12). Staff also recommends providing surface bike parking stalls at a minimum rate of one for every 20 residential units (6). These parking stalls should be in a convenient, well-lit location within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing for surface and enclosed parking should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). General Comment 40. Staff recommends implementing four (min.) suggested additional Travel Demand Management strategies (see Transportation Review memo). General Comment 41. Staff recommends including organics recycling drop-off onsite for residents. General Comment 42. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4-9 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends adding a green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. General Comment 43. Community garden faces North, with limited South or East sun exposure. Consider moving to the southside of the building, or to the rooftop to reduce urban heat island effect (see comment above) General Comment 44. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates 4040 W 70th St as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends increasing the coverage of rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 45. See Sustainable Design Questionnaire for additional considerations. General Comment Date: May 6, 2021 To: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Cc: 4040 Valley View Road, Owner and Development Team From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 4040 Valley View Road – Transportation Review Ecumen and Lupe Development Partners are proposing to redevelop 4040 Valley View Rd, currently occupied by ACA International. The proposed redevelopment would replace the existing office building with a three- story building with 118 affordable senior residential units. Wenck completed a traffic impact study (TIS) for this project on behalf of the City. This memo will review the findings of the TIS and other transportation impacts of the proposed development. Trip Generation To account for changes in traffic patterns that has occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Wenck used a combination of data collected for previous studies in the area and data collected in 2021. The newly collected data was reviewed and adjusted using previous data to account for pandemic-related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for existing volumes in non-pandemic conditions. Wenck analyzed proposed trip generation based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This manual provides national average traffic generation rates for different land uses. Wenck estimates that the proposed project will generate an additional 144 daily trips compared to the existing use. Trips in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours are estimated to reduce by 11 and 4 trips, respectively. Figure 1 shows the distribution of trips for existing and proposed uses. Figure 1: Trip Generation for Existing and Proposed Uses 35 35 293 24 31 437 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily TotalTrips Existing Office Proposed Residential Capacity Analysis Four roadway corridors surrounding the site were studied by Wenck (Valley View Rd, W 69 th St, W 70th St and France Ave), as well as six adjacent intersections along those corridors (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Study Intersections Wenck’s modeling shows that all study intersections will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) C or better through 2024, with no difference between the Build and No-Build scenarios. The daily trips added by the proposed project are anticipated to have minimal impact on the surrounding roads through 2024, and no improvements are needed to accommodate the additional traffic. Parking Analysis 86 underground parking stalls and 23 surface stalls are proposed for a total of 109 stalls for this site. City Code requires a minimum of one parking stall for each residential unit, or 118 for this project. This project requires a parking stall variance for nine stalls. Wenck evaluated parking demand for the proposed development using national data from ITE’s Parking Generation, 5th Edition. The peak parking demand is estimated at 72 stalls, which can be accommodated by the proposed number of parking stalls. Multi-Modal Facilities 4040 Valley View Rd is currently bordered by 5’ boulevard-style sidewalks along Valley View Rd to the west and W 70th St to the south. 5’ boulevard -style sides exist on both sides of W 70 th St between Highway 100 and York Ave. On-street bike lanes are also present on W 70th St adjacent to the site (dedicated lanes west of Valley View Rd and shared lanes between Valley View Rd and France Ave). The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (2018) recommends dedicated bike lanes on W 70 th St between Valley View and France Ave; this recommended facility is not proposed for construction in the current 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. The closest transit stops to the site are on W 70th St between the Galleria and Target (less than a ½ mile or a 10-minute walk away). These stops are for Metro Transit Local Route 538, which serves Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. Route 538 operates seven days a week with an average frequency of 30-60 minutes. Stops for Local Route 6 are also less than a 10-minute walk from the site near France Ave and Hazelton Rd. Route 6 serves Edina and Minneapolis, operates seven days a week with an average frequency of 15 minutes (4-10 minutes during rush hours). The site is also less than a mile (less than a 20-minute walk) from the Southdale Transit Center, from which several other routes can be accessed. The stops for Routes 6, 538 and the Southdale Transit Center are all accessible from the site using existing sidewalks. The site is also in the vicinity of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus service. CloverRide is a reliable, continuous transportation service providing accessibility from senior housing locations to amenities like groceries, retail and recreation in the Southdale district. The service runs Fridays from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. and costs just $3 per day. Although the bus primarily follows a fixed route, riders within two blocks of the route can request special pick-ups or drop-offs. 4040 Valley View Rd is only one block west of the fixed route (see Figure 3). Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Table 1 details the ways in which the proposed redevelopment supports current City transportation plans and policies. Table 1: Compliance with Transportation Plans/Policies Comprehensive Plan (2018) Goal Assessment 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. The project provides facilities for pedestrians and motorists but could improve on bicycle facilities. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. The project provides facilities for pedestrians and motorists but could improve on bicycle facilities. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Staff recommends installing electric vehicle (EV) charging stations for a minimum of 5% (6 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (11 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. EV charging stations should be in convenient locations near primary building entrances. Figure 3: CloverRide Service Map 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single - occupancy vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicle trips and the use of alternative travel options. The project promotes walking with varied on-site amenities (fitness center, clubroom, business center) and facilities for pedestrians. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high- performance transit service and connections. The applicant should consider providing directional signage/information for local transit service or subsidizing transit passes for tenants and employees (see Travel Demand Management Policy below). 7. Develop and manage parking provisions to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride- sharing and bicycle parking. Site plan includes a bike storage room on the first floor. Staff recommends providing a minimum of one bike parking stall for every 10 residential units (12). Staff also recommends providing surface bike parking stalls at a minimum rate of one for every 20 residential units (6). These parking stalls should be in a convenient, well-lit location within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing for surface and enclosed parking should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). The applicant should consider providing information on ride-sharing services to tenants and employees (see Travel Demand Management Policy below). 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. The applicant should review turning movements and travel routes for delivery vehicles. Steps should be taken to minimize the impact of delivery vehicles on pedestrian movement through the site (additional signage, designated delivery zones, etc.). 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadway adjacent to community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. Proposed trees, vegetation, signage and other items adjacent to intersections should maintain a clear view zone as defined in Section 26-190 of City Code. 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. Proposed public sidewalks along Valley View Rd and W 70th St should be 5’ wide (min.) with 5’ boulevards (min.) to improve user safety and comfort. Living Streets Plan (2015) Principle Assessment 2. Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. The project provides facilities for pedestrians and motorists but could improve on bicycle facilities. 4. The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. The project includes perimeter sidewalks that connect to existing facilities in the area. 10. Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. The applicant should consider maintaining sufficient space on the north and east sides of the site for future sidewalk connections to adjacent properties. 13. Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life for the public. Wider sidewalk boulevards along Valley View Rd and W 70th St will improve pedestrian safety and comfort adjacent to the property. Greater Southdale District Plan (2018) Transportation Goals and Policies Assessment 1-A. Regional Roadway Access Maintain adequate regional vehicle accessibility while also minimizing its negative impacts on Greater Southdale area circulation, not only regarding cars and vehicle deliveries, but also transit and bicycle usage, and pedestrian convenience and comfort. The project is not expected to have an impact on roadway capacity or level of service along France Avenue. 1-C. Internal Roadways Develop prototype streetscape designs for new streets/roadways created as art of and to service redevelopment, and for possible re-design of existing streets/roadways, emphasizing legibility, pedestrian safety and comfort, street trees and other greenery, energy- efficient, pedestrian-scale lighting, and sustainability and storm water management techniques. The application narrative mentions amenities like boulevard trees, public art, and stormwater management features. 1-G. Parking and Loading Develop a plan to establish public District shared parking facilities in key locations to serve public facilities and/or to augment private parking. Future-proof parking structures by requiring flexibility and adaptability in above-ground parking structure for possible future changes in use, addressing such issues as floor-to-ceiling height and other relevant features. The proposed parking supply is nine stall short of the City’s requirements. Wenck estimates that the supply will exceed the estimated peak demand by 37 stalls. Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) Proposed Strategies (Tier 1 – min. 5 unique strategies identified)  Enclosed bike storage for residential tenants (12 stalls minimum are recommended by staff). Suggested Additional Strategies  Provide surface bike parking (6 stalls minimum recommended)  Provide a bike repair station on-site, located adjacent to bike parking.  Construct perimeter and internal sidewalks 8’ wide or more to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists  Provide directional signage/information for adjacent pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities and ride-sharing services  Promote use of the City’s CloverRide circulator bus  Subsidize Metro Transit passes for tenants and employees May 5, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official & Rick Hammerschmidt, Fire Marshall 4040 70th St W – 118-Unit New Senior Apartment Building - Rezoning Information / Background: New four-story apartment building with 118-units and underground parking. - This would be an S-1 parking and R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code. - Provide a complete Build Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. - NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required and NFPA 72 Fire Alarm System is required. - Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Permit Required. - Verify Address. May want to change address to 6975 Valley View Rd because of the main entry is on Valley View Rd. - Provide a new fire hydrant off of Valley View Rd within 100ft of FDC near main entrance. - Verify Fire Department access and assure the pore-cochere is high enough (12’) for fire vehicles to pass under. - The balconies are smaller on this apartment building so there will not be enough room to install any kind of grill on the balcony. - Verify there is adequate assessable parking. This has been a past issue in some older buildings. - Verify noise ordinance is complying and understood. Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed - Recommend a meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent before submitting for building permit. STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE OF THE PROPERTY TEAM & EXPERIENCE OVERVIEW 4040 WEST 70TH STREET CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING& DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 CITY OF EDINA APR 12 20Z1 PLANNING DEFAH i NIENT Mill City Quarter Woonerf 4040 WEST 70TH STREET STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY 4040 West 70th Street Apartments, LP is creating senior affordable rental housing, an amenity space with community- based programming and public art, transforming the existing 4040 West 70th parcel. We hope to create an appealing housing option for Edina residents greater than 55 years old, who wish to remain in their community after retirement. A compelling package of green space coupled with high performance sustainable development practices makes for a demonstration project of extraordinary value. INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY Our design, construction methods, and amenities will be high quality. We will provide no less than 25%-unit masonry exteriors, with architectural grade metal and durable cement exterior materials, high performance sound mitigation engineering, and quality interior finishes that rival "market- rate" properties. Our housing choices are complimentary to the neighborhood's need, with a large and growing "age-in- place" population. A diverse range of housing price points will add opportunities to the Cornelia neighborhood and address a chronic shortage of need-specific senior housing — at an affordable price point. This parcel would contain 118 units, comprised of 83% 1-bedroom and 17% 2-bedroom units. We believe we can achieve 118 parking spaces through a combination of below ground and at-grade stalls, subject to input from planning staff and community. One and a half acres sounds like a lot, but in reality, this is a compact and challenging site demanding creative thinking and flexible strategies to produce a winning outcome. The parcel is north-south in orientation, and Valley View Road is the least traveled street of the two hard edges. A prominent traffic circle on 70th Street suggests minimizing access from the south. The Southdale Design Experience suggests a stepping on the west edge that projects closer to France Avenue. Affordability is best paid for with density, but the limitations of below-grade and surface parking may constrain unit counts below the permitted maximum. Our goal is to create dual-purpose spaces that serve both as connection points to the public realm, but also operate to infiltrate storm water and provide green edges with visual interest. We believe the below grade parking should be entered from the west side of the property. The economics and circulation limitations permit only one level of such parking. There are a variety of surface parking options along with a vehicle drop of/pick up area The site will feature walking paths through and around the site to encourage physical activity and connect residents to the rich selection retail, commercial and entertainment within blocks. An outdoor gathering space for social activity, community gardens, raised beds and lush landscape serve to encourage resident engagement and to connect to street grid. The building will have first floor common areas and amenities including lobby, fitness center, community/ clubroom with kitchen, business center, package and mail center, trash and recyctiqgftciittimilieasing/management offices. Viewshed from Valley View will provide for an outdoor public art component. APR 12 2021 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP PLANNING DEPARTMENT STATEMENT OF INTENDED USE OF PROPERTY The development team will set aside funds for locally commissioned art sculpture or similar artist installations. We would like to approach the Edina Arts Commission for participation in this effort, and we have suggested the idea to the staff at the Edina Arts Center in our outreach conversations with them. The unit mix will be one- and two-bedroom units averaging 610 and 930 square feet, respectively, will feature complete kitchens with full sized cooktop/oven, over cooktop microwaves, refrigerator/ freezer, dishwasher, and disposal. Cabinets will be solid wood construction. Some units will have either islands or peninsula kitchen layouts, while others will be galley style. An emphasis on closet space, both at entry and in the main body of each unit will be provided. Up to 35% of the apartment homes will have a deck or balcony. The project will include design elements to intentionally support the health, safety and accessibility of its future residents. Units and common areas will comply with the principals of Universal Design, which will allow for accessibility to populations with physical limitations. In addition to this commitment, a number of fully handicapped accessible units will be provided so that a person in a wheelchair could use all amenities of the apartment and some units will be adaptable for persons with vision or hearing impairments to allow them to live independently. Residential hallways will have handrails on one side and grab-bars will be provided in unit bathrooms. An enhanced lighting design package will consider needs of aging eyes. To mitigate spread of infectious disease, automatic plumbing fixtures and accessories will be used in public restrooms, automatic lighting, door openers and antimicrobial materials will be used when / where possible. ZONING / PUD The complexities of the site offer some design challenges to incorporate sufficient parking, attractive amenity spaces, landscape and storm management. We have conferred with City Planner Cary Teague on two occasions regarding appropriate land use, and we recommend a rezoning from PCD3 to a specific PUD for affordable housing, that staff could probably embrace. The PUD could allow for some flexibilities on parking such that not all is required below ground, and in particular, the exterior materials requirements of the planned district could be balanced between masonry, architectural metal and either lap or panel fiber cement that is attractively deployed. These are important cost considerations we believe an experienced team can help mitigate on the issue of design, producing excellent architecture at an effective price point. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 3 TO U.G. PARKING LOBBY Jo' 4040 WEST 70TH STREET TEAM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE RAIN GARDEN O 1/ c:C LANDSCAPE SCREENING RAIN GARDEN COMMUNITY SCULPTURE \ COMMUNITY GARDENS .9 1 ART/COMMUNITY 1_1 ROOM 1111 Ll 1 I LISTAIRi H 1H L_ 17111711111__.Ji: ) )- - - - -4 - i _ t____ _. I Ai L ___ TA W. 70TH STREET PROJECT TEAM OVERVIEW Applicant is a joint venture of Ecumen and Lupe 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP ECUMEN 3530 Lexington Avenue North, Shoreview, MN 55126 Contact: Anne Stanfield, Director of Business Development annestanfield@ecumen.org I (651) 766-4320 LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC 1701 Madison Street NE, Suite 111, Minneapolis, MN 55413 Contact: Steve Minn, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer steve.minn@lupedevelopment.com I (612) 843-4069 CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WHO WE ARE, & WHAT WE DO The development team, which consists of Ecumen and Lupe Development Partners, LLC, were selected by the Edina Housing Foundation to develop this affordable housing project on its land. The two development teams have created a joint venture called 4040 West 70th Street Apartments, LP. The project team features companies and professionals who have partnered successfully on housing developments in the Twin Cities for years. We offer the reassurance of a well- organized, experienced partnership to redevelop the existing office building on the site into a community-orientated housing option that will be a model demonstration project. Proven success in developing affordable housing. ( Experience with complex sites (power lines, tracks, zoning, tight sites). Creative solutions for connecting to outdoor amenities. < Enhancing communities with site-specific buildings and programs. 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP TEAM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE JOINT VENTURE: 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP YECUMEN® Ecumen is one of the largest and most innovative nonprofit providers of senior housing and services in Minnesota and the nation. Founded more than 150 years ago, Ecumen develops and operates a variety of senior housing options and services, including cooperative senior housing, independent living, assisted living, long-term care, short-term rehabilitation care, senior affordable housing, as well as at-home and community- based services including home care and hospice, an online durable medical equipment store, and consulting services in management, marketing and development. Ecumen employs nearly 3,000 team members and serves more than 15,000 customers annually. The Minneapolis/St. Paul Business Journal has named Ecumen one of Minnesota's "Best Places to Work" ten times. A 501(c)(3) corporation headquartered in Shoreview, MN, Ecumen does business in four states, managing over 44 senior communities -- 31 of which are both owned and operated. Affordable housing has been part of Ecumen's portfolio for nearly 50 years, and over one third of Ecumen's owned communities offer subsidized housing, providing 580 units of affordable housing to seniors in Minnesota. Ecumen has long been recognized as a leader and innovator in senior housing and services, distinguishing itself among other nonprofit providers by embracing several of the strategies for- profits have used to build scale. Senior Housing News recently named Ecumen as one of its "6 Senior Living Providers to Watch in 2020." Over the past two decades, Ecumen has transformed its business from traditional skilled nursing care to a diverse mix of independent living, subsidized housing, assisted living, campus-based skilled care offerings, and an innovative co-op model, as well as home health and hospice service lines. Ecumen has developed 11 senior residential properties in Minnesota in the past 10 years, working closely with city officials on designs that fit and complement each individual community. Ecumen is known for creating innovative living spaces and services for seniors, priding itself on life enrichment programming to keep residents active and engaged. On the cutting edge of using Al technology in senior housing, Ecumen has recently implemented a Minnesota Department of Human Services grant-funded pilot designed to reduce social isolation and promote social connectedness. It's Abiitan Mill City community, which opened in 2016 in the heart of downtown Minneapolis, has been widely recognized for its unique integration in the broader urban community, with features such as two restaurants and a fitness center open to the public. Recent awards include a 2019 Award of Excellence from the MN Chapter of the Commercial Real Estate Development for its Zvago St. Anthony Park Cooperative community, and a Special Recognition Award in 2015 from the American Institute of Architects for innovative age-friendly design for Abiitan Mill City. A selection of Ecumen's developments include: ABIITAN MILL CITY— MINNEAPOLIS, MN Receiving a Special Recognition Award from the American Institute of Architects for innovative age-friendly design, Abiitan Mill City provides Downtown Minneapolis with its first senior housing complex in over 20 years, developed on one of the last open parcels of land in the Mill District. A five-story building, this project includes market-rate Independent Housing with Services apartments (86 units), Memory Care apartments (48 units), and 2 additional levels of underground parking. Abiitan uniquely supports the active lifestyle of its residents, creates a strong connection with the local community and facilitates intergenerational engagement with its location and programming. The building, which is in walking distance to many of the city's top amenities (Mississippi River, Stone Arch Bridge, Guthrie, Mill City Museum) includes two public restaurants and a gym with outside membership. Abiitan opened in 2016. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 2 TEAM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE JOINT VENTURE: 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP • SEASONS AT APPLE VALLEY, APPLE VALLEY, MN Seasons at Apple Valley consists of 106 independent or assisted living market-rate rental apartment homes, as well as 28 additional residences for seniors requiring 24-hour enhanced or memory care services. Independent units range from studios to two-bedrooms, offering a variety of layouts. A vital part of the lifestyle at Ecumen Seasons at Apple Valley is the inviting community spaces, which include: grand entry, great room with fireside lounge and bar, creative arts studio, a chef's kitchen with three distinctive restaurant areas, spa and beauty salon, state of the art fitness center, movie theater, and guest suite. Seasons of Apple Valley opened in 2012. GITY OF EDINA Lupe Development Partners Lupe Development Partners, LLC is a woman- owned W/ MBE Certified real estate development company that began operations in 1989. Lupe has focused its portfolio of housing-related development activities on transit- oriented development and adaptive reuse. The company has created (or is currently in development with) over 2,000 units of affordable housing, market-rate apartments and ownership units in the Twin Cities, and over 2 Million square feet of commercial, office, industrial and retail. Lupe only manages for its own account, providing asset management in cooperation with a dedicated team within its residential portfolio and performing direct property management to its retail and office portfolio. Lupe Development Partners has developed over 1,000 units of affordable housing in the last 20 years in Hennepin and Ramsey Counties. We still co-own and manage all of these units. A typical tax credit project requires a 30-year commitment to affordability which is our typical program. Since 1989, Lupe Development has created over $500 Million of real estate value from the ground-up including condominiums, rental housing, retail, office and industrial property. Lupe has attracted over $55 Million of private tax credit investor equity in its affordable housing developments since 2012, and has a well- earned reputation as a firm that can overcome obstacles and challenges. We are problem- solvers first and foremost. It is often said that awards are rarely given unless you apply, but we are proud to have many "award-winning" projects in our portfolio, ranging from "best of..." citations, unique engineering applications, creative financing, or innovations in housing. Most recently in 2016, Finance & Commerce presented Lupe Development Partners with two Top Projects awards for Mill City Quarter and Broadway Flats. Mill City Quarter also won an engineering award for our stormwater design. STONE ARCH APARTMENTS, MINNEAPOLIS, MN In 2000, the Stone Arch Apartments became the first truly affordable rental apartments to be built in the high demand riverfront area of Minneapolis. Stone Arch Apartments are a fitting addition to an area successfully making the transition from historic and industrial to recreational and residential. The Stone Arch Apartments are designed to reflect the history of the area while providing unique high-tech living spaces that offer everything that modern lifestyles demand. The warehouse/ industrial-chic vernacular creates apartment styles previously found only in other cities like San Francisco, Chicago or New York. Stone Arch's interior finishes include industrial lighting, high ceilings, huge windows, exposed beams, ductwork and warehouse-style spaces, which create an environment fitting the modern urban professional. 520 SECOND STREET SE APARTMENTS (N/K/A STONE ARCH 2), MINNEAPOLIS, MN This 91-unit apartment building in Marcy Holmes was delivered in 2014, with the help of Hennepin County TOD funds for site improvements and utility relocations. 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 3 APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY FLATS, MINNEAPOLIS, MN Located in North Minneapolis at the corner of Broadway and Penn Avenue North, this 103-unit development with 10,000 SF of retail is located in a corridor ravaged by the 2010 tornado, and was made possible with the partnership of federal, state, regional, county and city resources. This mixed-use development has 10 efficiencies, 82 one- bedroom, and 15 two-bedroom units above underground and tuck under parking. Our effort to "raise the bar" about how the north side community thought about affordable housing was accomplished with attention to detail, an impressive list of amenities and keen budget control. The project features a cyber-cafe, community room, conference room, exercise facility, bike storage, and storage lockers. The overall project was delivered on-time and under budget. 0 LAKE STREET APARTMENTS, MINNEAPOLIS, MN The site is on Lake Street, just two blocks east of the Lyn- Lake intersection and one block south of the Midtown Greenway, completed on November 1, 2020 and 90% of the 111 work force affordable units are leased as of February 1. The owner has also committed to house up to nine (9) veterans who are homeless and have disabilities. This development is in a community that has become a high-rent district; the majority of new housing in last ten years has been high-end market rate, with market-rent exceeding the median income levels. This transit-oriented redevelopment revitalizes current surface parking, automotive and warehouse uses, and creates high-density affordable housing with emphasis on pedestrian and bicycle-focused connections to existing amenities and new transit connections. The overall project was delivered on- time and under budget. Lupe Development Partners has a successful development history of working with the property manager, architect, and processing agent. TEAM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE JOINT VENTURE: 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP It has great river views and is in close proximity to Downtown and the U of M. The project consists of a six-story building with 91 underground parking spaces. The project was conceived to address the long-standing waiting list of affordable units at Stone Arch Apartments around the corner, and is managed as part of the Stone Arch "campus" for the development team. Stone Arch 2 is 100% affordable, workforce focused, and has primarily 1-bedroom units with 15% studios. Amenities include a business center, community room, fitness center, extensive bicycle parking and connections to the riverfront walking and biking trails. Units have large closets and many of the units have decks and/or balconies. MILL CITY QUARTER (MCQ), MINNEAPOLIS, MN An innovative demonstration of multiple property owner cooperation, MCQ offers Minneapolis' first "woonerf" creating a pedestrian and bicycle linkage to Park Board trails between the river and the downtown streets. The woonerf includes an inviting educational interpretation of this district's historic milling and rail past as well as sculptures and seating areas for public enjoyment. Hennepin TOD funds helped fund our woonerf and site improvements, allowing for a public easement with the Minneapolis Park Board for trail use. In conjunction with the neighboring Abiitan senior project, the master development provides unique housing and services in a downtown campus. MCQ consists of one six-story building with 150-units of affordable senior-marketed & workforce housing, 14,000 sq. ft. of first floor retail and 227 underground and surface parking spaces. The unit mix is comprised of 115 one-bedroom units and 35 two-bedroom apartments. This downtown Minneapolis parcel is at the gateway to the historic riverfront milling district offering a rich patina of public recreation and transit options, in proximity to a vibrant and ethnically diverse employment base delivered on-time and under budget. CITY OF EDINA, APR 12 2021 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP Li PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEAM OVERVIEW & EXPERIENCE JOINT VENTURE: 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP PROPERTY MANAGER: ECUMEN Founded in 1862, Ecumen has grown to be among the most innovative leaders in senior housing and services with a passion for serving older adults and helping them live richer, fuller lives. Working closely with the US Department of Housing and Urban Development and Minnesota Housing, Ecumen currently provides its unique and caring management style to 15 affordable senior communities containing more than 863 housing units. It has several additional affordable housing projects in process. Ecumen also has extensive experience and success at providing independent housing to hundreds of individuals in the older adult community across multiple states, as well as being a provider of skilled nursing care, assisted living, memory care and other needs-based senior care across four states. Ecumen's value also comes from its highly skilled, well-trained, experienced and dedicated workforce. Ecumen takes great pride in the services it provides to those who have chosen to be residents and, over time, has worked closely with HUD and other agencies to develop tenant selection guidelines that are fair and equitable to all and that help ensure a safe, affordable and enjoyable quality of life. Ecumen strongly advocates for those it serves and practices diversity and inclusion — proudly embracing the differences among people. Ecumen welcomes all people as customers, employees and vendors, regardless of race, color, age, national origin, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion, physical ability, marital status, political beliefs, economic status — and all the many other ways people can be different from one another. Ecumen strives to uphold a culture where everyone is included and treated with dignity and respect. Honoring diversity and inclusion inspires people to engage, create, innovate and help drive organizational success. By giving all people the opportunity to contribute their skills, experience, passion and perspectives, Ecumen is a stronger company. ARCHITECT: POPE ARCHITECTS Pope Architects is an architecture and interior design firm based in St. Paul, MN, founded in 1974. The firm's practice is diverse and its reputation and expertise is well-established in multiple market sectors including multi-family housing, senior living, commercial, and healthcare. Pope Architects provides services around the country with a focus in the upper Midwest market. The firm's housing practice has grown over the last decade and includes over 5,000 units of multi-family and senior living housing designed by a dedicated housing team. Pope's team members have a unique sensitivity to the dynamics of housing planning and design that comes from their extensive work in multi-family and senior living campuses throughout the United States. They also bring the wisdom in project management gained from years of professional experience serving the needs of residents, families, staff and administrators. DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT: RIPPLEY RICHARD Rippley Richard brings over 25 years of real estate development experience utilizing a variety of public and private funds. The principals of Rippley Richard have played key roles on development teams from securing necessary financing to development team coordination that keeps projects on time and on budget. Rippley Richard successfully navigates and balances the intricacies of new construction, acquisition and rehab, historic preservation, 100% affordable housing, mixed-income housing, mixed-use developments, commercial space, community assets, portfolio refinancing and general development consultation. The development team has engaged Rippley Richard to work on this development. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 5 NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT JOINT VENTURE: 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP CORRESPONDENCE LAKE CORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION From: Nora Davis <noradavis73@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 8:25 AM To: Cameron Flakne <Cameron.Flakne@lupedevelopment.com > Subject: 404 West 70th - Update Morning - Cameron! Hope you are doing well - and staying dry. The Association doesn't provide letters of support for development projects. We will, however, continue to facilitate dialogue between neighbors and your development team. Now that it's getting warmer - we will be able to meet outside and on-site. Thanks - Nora SOUTH CORNELIA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION From: South Cornelia Neighborhood Association <SouthCorneliaNA@gmail.com > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 12:46:19 PM To: Cameron Flakne <Cameron.Flakne@lupedevelopment.com > Subject: Re: 404 West 70th - Update Hi Cameron, Like Nora and the Lake Cornelia Neighborhood Association, our South Cornelia Neighborhood Association also doesn't do endorsements of any kind. It's nothing personal — our bylaws simply don't permit it. And as Nora said, we're happy to continue helping the conversation along with all the interested folks around the 4040 West 70th Street area. All the best, Joel CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP (ECUMEN® Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. ' NMI PROJECT TEAM SHEET INDEX APPLICANT ISA JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN & LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS EXISTING SITE CIVIL 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT COVER SHEET ECUMEN 3530 LEXINGTON AVENUE NORTH, SHOREVIEW, MN 55126 ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 02 CONTEXT PLAN ALTA SURVEY CITY OF EDINA CONTACT: ANNE STANFIELD, DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200, ST. PAUL, MN 55108 GENERAL NOTES ANNESTANFIELD@ECUMEN.ORG I (651) 766-4320 LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC WARD ISAACSON, PRESIDENT— WISAACSON@POPEARCH.COM ZAC ROSENOW, ARCHITECT— ZROSENOW@POPEARCH.COM ARCHITECTURAL 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN APR 12 2021 1701 MADISON STREET NE, SUITE 111, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 CIVIL ENGINEER 04 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION DIAGRAM GRADING PLAN CONTACT: STEVE MINN, VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER STEVE.MINN@LUPEDEVELOPMENT.COM I (612) 843-4069 KIMLEY-HORN 767 N EUSTIS ST SUITE 100, ST PAUL, MN 55114 05 FLOOR PLANS: LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL ONE UTILITY PLAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 00 BRIAN WURDEMAN, CIVIL ENGINEER — BRIAN.WURDEMAN@KIMLEY-HORN.COM 06 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL TWO & LEVEL THREE LANDSCAPE PLAN 07 FLOOR PLANS: LEVEL FOUR & ROOF LANDSCAPE DETAILS COVER SHEET 08 ELEVATION DRAWINGS *NOTE: SCALE IS PRESERVED ONLY WHEN PRINTED AT 24X36. 09 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley*lorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 01 EXISTING CONDITIONS & CONTEXT Lupe Development Partners (ECUMEI\l' JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley0Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINP, APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 02 CONTEXT PLAN <CC\.RESTORATION • HARDWARE & RH RESTAURANT' •tAl BANK OF AMERICA BMO HARRIS BREMER BANK' /SALON CONCEPTS ROCHE BOBOIS ilaNDERBERRY I HILL CHILD *if DEVELOPMENji CENTER "Ir 4,-2/ SOUTHDALE ',PET HOSPITAL TD AMERITRADE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD ROOM & BOARD I 1 qlr (ECUMEN1' Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECU MEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDI NA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 1"=20' 03 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN MOM CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1.41INGIE - AP. SVIWOLIt R411141.1.111.110111VARIFS MUT VIVIIIOAD /1' ( ( RAIN GARDEN 4 *# ( COMMUNITY SCULPTURE ART/COMMUNITY HI0 ROOM DLI II ST4AJ R TAIR At W. 70TH STREET RAIN GARDEN STAT TO U.G. PARKING/ - • `Nt• 1.1aW LOBBY (ECLIM EN' Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS KimlepAlorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOT TO SCALE 04 PEDESTRIAN & TRANSIT CIRCULATION I BICYCLE CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION W 7 OTHarS,Tomosio. UV voTH O DISTANCE TO TRANSIT STOPS 70TH ST W & TARGET -- 0.4 MI FRANCE AVE S & 72ND ST -- 0.4 MI YORK AVE S & 69TH ST W -- 0.7 MI SOUTH DALE EXIT & YORK AVE -- 0.7 MI SITE PARKING Type Use TOTAL VEHICULAR SURFACE 23 UNDERGROUND 86 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 109 BICYCLE OUTDOORS (PUBLIC) TBD INDOORS (RESIDENT/PRIVATE) TOD TOTAL BICYCLE RACKS 0 I(ECUMEN® • -5 1.1 U.,. • Lupe Development Partners CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Setter. 1"=20' CORR 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BED STAN 2 EEO 1 0E0 STORAGE ART ROOM 1 BED 1 BED .L 1 BED 1 BED MAINTENANCE OFFICE '1 7 WORK ROOM OFFICER OFFICE.2 1:1 1 BED STAIR ,11111111, ELECMATA LRIDRY \ I BED 2 BED STORAG / / I 2 1 RED 1 BED CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE [ SUPPORT APARTMENTS Unit Type GSF 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor TOTAL Units1 % of Total NKSF Al 1 BED 500 10 11 11 10 42 82% 21,000 A2 1 BED 600 8 12 12 7 39 23,400 A3 1 BED 750 3 6 5 2 16 12,000 B1 2 BED 875 3 4 3 3 13 11,375 B2 2 BED 1035 2 2 2 2 8 18% 8,280 TOTAL PER FLOOR 26 35 33 24 TOTAL UNITS 118 100% TOTAL UNIT S.F. 76,055 BUILDING GROSS S.F. Lower Level 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor S.F. TOTAL 31,400 31,400 29,600 21,500 113,900 31,400 31,400 TOTAL BUILDING 145,300 EX 05 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED WATER/ SPRINKLER LOWER LEVEL & LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLANS LOWER LEVEL PLAN LEVEL 1 PLAN JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE A RC H I TEC T S Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 06 LEVEL 2 & LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLANS lJ STORAGE ELEVATOR LOBBY 1 BED 2 BED 2 BED L — LEVEL 2 PLAN 2 BED 1 BED SH 1 BED 2 BED _ 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BED ELEVATOR LOBBY r el 1 _. BED ,- BED 1 BED ' 1 BED . - 2 0ED LEVEL 3 PLAN INCH MEDD GREEN ROOF 2 BED 1 BED _I] CIRCULATION COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT YEC U M E Lupe Development Partners /AEON (E,CLIMEN' Lupe Development Partners 1 BEE 1 BED T 1 BED STAIR ROOFTOP ROOFTOP LOUNGE 1 BED V STORAGE 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED ELEVATOR LOBBY 2 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED 1 BEN 1 BED 1 BED 1 BED 2 BED JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE A RC H I T E C TS KimleyHorn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1"=20' 07 LEVEL 4 & ROOF FLOOR PLANS LEVEL 4 PLAN ROOF PLAN - PHOTOVU.TAIO SYSTEM - 1 BED CIRCULATION Li COMMON SPACE INDEPENDENT LIVING STORAGE SUPPORT 2 BED 1 BED ROOFTOP 1 BED N 1 BED N 1 BED N STOREFRONT METAL SIDING SOUTH NORTH REFINISHED BALCONIES/RAILINGS P II it NM NE 11 II r1 11 PP H 11 Ss so Nu o II H •• •• WEST EAST II II II •• 11 11 111 •• •• ME .111 Vi i' 1 11 1 11) II ! 11 11 1 1 11 11111111,11 mm 1111.-.11V-11117 FIBER CEMENT1 COI OP 21 H I! II 11 !I II II .111 11 11 11 It II 11C- FIBER CEMENT Cn! OR RH HR CT(11,1-1-C,r, JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BASED ON 1/16" PERSPECTIVES MATERIALS - TOTAL BUILDING MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 4,740 11.1% METAL 13,634 32.0% FIBER CEMENT LAP 10,741 25.2% GLASS 13,499 31.7% TOTALS 42,614 100.0% (EC.0 M E ® Lupe Development Partners • • • • • • • I • I STONE FIBER CEMENT COLOR-2 METAL PANE /di Tin RH E] LEI 11:1 • • 11 ma 1'1 111111 II Ii i1 Ir,1 11 11 • • ST( ,BER CEMENT COLOR-1 COMPOSITE WINDOWS/DOORS EAST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,408 10.6% METAL 2,324 17.5% FIBER CEMENT LAP 4,724 35.5% GLASS 4,839 36.4% TOTALS 13,295 100.0% WEST ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,546 1 1.8% METAL 4,599 35.2% FIBER CEMENT LAP 2,837 21.7% GLASS 4,072 31.2% TOTALS 13,054 100.0% FIBER CEMENT COLOR-I SOUTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 1,363 15.8% METAL 2,833 32.9% FIBER CEMENT LAP 1,934 22.5% GLASS 2.473 28.7% TOTALS 8,603 100.0% NORTH ELEVATION MATERIAL NAME MATERIAL AREA PERCENT of WALL MASONRY 423 5.5% METAL 3,878 50.6% FIBER CEMENT LAP 1,246 16.3% GLASS 2,115 27.6% TOTALS 7.662 100.0% 08 I II ELEVATIONS CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 09.1 YEC U M E N® Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>) Horn Expect More. Experience Better. PLANNING DEPARTMEN iRENDERINGS AERIAL PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST PERSPECTIVE LOOKING EAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN* Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimler)>Horn Expect More. Experience Better. 09.2 RENDERINGS Lupe Development Partners 09.3 RENDERINGS APR 12 2021 CITY OF EDINA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING SOUTHEAST FROM VALLEY VIEW DRIVE PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Lupe Development Partners 09.4 RENDERINGS APR 12 2021 CITY OF EDINA PERSPECTIVE LOOKING NORTH FROM W 70TH STREET PLANNING DEPARTMENT (ECUMEN® JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 POPE ARCHITECTS Kimlep)Horn Expect More. Experience Better. Lupe Development Partners JOINT VENTURE OF ECUMEN AND LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS BLACK COMPOSITE WINDOWS STOREFRONT, BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES AND PATIO DOORS )(ECUMEN® 4040 WEST 70TH STREET APARTMENTS, LP 4040 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA CITY OF EDINA PRELIMINARY REZONING & DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APRIL 12, 2021 DARK GRAY POWDERCOATED METAL PANEL STACKED, LIGHT COLORED STONE LIGHT WARM GRAY FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-1) MID-GRAY/BLUE FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING (COLOR-2) 10 EXTERIOR MATERIALS POPE ARCHITECTS Kimley>>> Horn Expect More. Experience Better. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 SUNSHADE POWDER COATED GRAY METAL BALCONIES STEEL, POWDER COATED PLANNING DEPARTMENT V1%10111111 iRil NMI Lupe Development Partners EDINA MULTIFAMILY z I— w 2 U) re 0 Z u j 0 111 w w ce ll w Se. La a. 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR EDINA MULTIFAMILY SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 28N, RANGE 24W 4040 70TH STREET WEST EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN PROJECT TEAM: OWNER / DEVELOPER LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 0 PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET V100 ALTA SURVEY C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 DEMO PLAN C300 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 1701 MADISON ST NE, SUITE 111 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 436-3200 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN A. HYLLESTED SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 TYLER STREET NE SUITE 100 TELEPHONE: (612)466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDO CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 1295 BANADANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 TELEPHONE: (651) 642-9200 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH full bleed D (36.00 x 24.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. Know what's below. Call before you dig. SHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BENCHMARKS SITE BENCHMARKS: (LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY) SBM #1 TOP OF MNDOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "2733 Q" GSID STATION #95550 ELEVATION=874.82 (NAVD 88) SBM #2 TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 70TH STREET WEST ELEVATION,872.55 (NAVD 86) C000 ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Kimley>>>Horn W 66TH STREET •. W 69TH STREET cad VICINITY N.T.S. KATWCLDEV \LUPE DEVELOPMENT \ Edina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAIMPlanSheets \CO-COVER SHEET.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:06am EY.dwg April 12, Cn 0) F_ rn Cy E FIELD BOOK PAGE OPMENTE DRAWING NAME: 39551.dee JOB NO. 39551 FILE NO. 5458 EV\LUPE DEV VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE FIELDWORK CHIEF: TV DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: CT NO. DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY ST MOWN" S0128'25 W 329.94 111 All AD mm C' ;-q SIX OVADadARX Mir Or IMAM? EleVoOr2.53 fT z 0 I- IY (/) 0 0 LL H z w 0_ EDINA MULTIFAMILY PREPARED FOR w 2 co CL 0 Z • re • < a a. a SHEET NUMBER V100 land surveyors since 1872 SHEET 1 OF 1 NOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4040 70th Street West Edina, Minnesota 55435 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM COP MIGHT 0 2020 By ECAIE FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis. Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 PAX: (612) 466-3383 4 6) SCALE IN FEET • FOUND IRON MONUMENT, AS NOTED • SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WITH LICENSE NUMBER 53536 O FOUND PK NAIL 3' 2 5 C ~Fy .142541 p: ry Ow Is ,17/-`,7/,`;"02XWI;1401135 AO, \ Cf: or-soz_16 1,817.9 RE-867.79-. E-847.7 15) lEoSS3J (£) 5) R gg o yy I '7°:;“ 7-".71454 31 //:',/ 1E I V I 1010701HSTROETIIEST BRICK BUMP. °MONO MO/We" APEAo14.112 YAK. SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates PiO660, • 611 • 7Th I V V • SOU .SPAR?Pot PLAT Or Off. PARR POST MOWN ,N0 .04 .25T 103.10 010OIN) a RAMP A s. "-I GE (CS' 5. PCP ny I L. 89-55:35V Q- -Re-OlO01 CoR 0. S IO 00) 0) 1,83 ( ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: Kimley-Horn & Associates LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract C. Register. Land Roney No. 1365. Hennepin County. Minnesoto. Deng Registered land as N eAclences1 by Certificate of Site Na 1511530. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system is bored on The Hennepin County comknote grid (HAD 133-2011 Ad)). 2. The legal description ond emernent informotien used in Al. preporalMn of this survey Is based on the Commitment fa Title Insurance prepared by Guaranty Commercial Title, Inc os agent for ad Republic TIVe Lowrance Compony, Commitment No. 651374 doled October 6, 2020. OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: 1. Monuments bore been placed ca 00 maim oomere of the property deserbed hereon, 010.33 Oreody marked or referenced by .13.g monuments or witnesses in dose proximity to the caner. 2. The address of the property deem/ed hereon is 4040 70th Street West, Fenno, lamest,. 55435. 3. November pr b or e n , ertz Igwioed hereon lies sit*, Flood Zone X per Federol Insurance Role Mop No. 2705300364F. doted I. The told wee of the property desorbed hereon N 68.634 square feet or 1.57562 crags. 5. The contours depicted hereon are per ele.tIon data calected while conducting the fieldwork_ The contour intend is I foot. BENCHMARK: T. of Minnesota Deportment of Transportation Geodetic Monument '2733 0' GSD stall. 4 95550 Elemtion = 674.82 feet. (HAW 85) SITE BENCHMARK: Top at of hydrant Mooted on the south side of 70th Street West Donation = 872.55 Net. (NAVE/ ea) 6a. No 204000 repot or letter was received eon the Insurer pursuant to OptIond Table A Item 6(a). os sat forth in the 2016 Minimum Standard Detol Requirements for ALTA/HSPS Lend Tithe Surveys. 7o. Exterior Miceog dimensions are depicted here.. 7b1. The exterior buldng footprint cr., at grand level is depleted hereon. & Substantial lecture. observed in the process of conducting th• fidokumk we depleted hereon. 9. As of the dote of .le survey the property de Led hereon contain a total 01 78 visbly stuped poriOng tomes of which 76 ore standard maces end 2 ere handicapped spaces. too. There ore no dinAsMn or party walls on the properly described hereon. 11. Existing utdities, serices ond underground sto/clures shown hereon mere located eltbm physics'!, iron existMg records made ova.. to us. by resident testimony, or by locations provided by Gopher State One Cd1, per Ticket No. 210140753. Hower, locking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be occurately, cornp'ete'y and relobly depicted. Mere additional orMore detaled information is reguided. the client is odrised that excavation may be necessory. Other utiities and 33esi<03 moy be present and verification and location of oh ulXities and nen,es should be obtained from the owners al the respective 5111105 prior loony deign, plonnim or escamtlon. 13. The names of adjonIng miners occording to anent toe records are depicted hereon. to. As of the date of this survey there Is no obseovobie eVdence of current earth moving work, buten; construction or bolding additions on the property deserioed Noe.. 17. The surveyor Is unoware of any completed or proposed change. M sheet right-of-way lines_ As of Um dote of this ee n y b Lher h e .,...n ts observoble eNdence of recent str.t or sidesok construction onrepoks that offect the property d o s z 19. No plottable offslte easements or senitudes were deelosed in documents provided to the mmayce. 20. Professional Liability Neuron. policy obtained by the aurveyor to be in elf.' throughout the contract term, SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: ITEM 5: Sanitary Sewer emement(e) over the Land as sham on the recorded plot of South Office Park First Addition, omit as sham on the recorded plat of Replat of Lot 2. Block 1, South Office Pork Fist Addition. So, Soelory sever enserne, of/eels 0-e surtesed property crtl Is eeocled herein. LEGEND • BENCHMARK S SANITARY MANHOLE O MANHOLE (0) STORY MANHOLE IMMO CATCH ITA911 ▪ ROOF DRAIN (VALET) En At/TO SF/MOILER ri/- HYDRANT 080 SPRINKLER VALVE o ELECTRIC MANHOLE O GATE VALVE • HANDHCCE ▪ UGHT Ob UTILITY KIX GI GAS METER SICOI • HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE S NW/CARPED PARKING SIGN 1151 PARKING COUNT SANITARY SEWER UNDERGROUND TELECOMMUNICATION WATERMAN! UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD WIRE O UNDERGROUND GAS ss STCRil SEWER a. ma SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR Leif G.°0( TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE WALL Au 20 40 60 (4) S 1 1 AAI v L., N I j J CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CERTIFICATION: T . o d Lups Der y opme Conr, oLIZIn ii eg,. 1.1 Inc oe 0, in;e t sts limited o Minnesota non-wolit commotion ublic TNI. nsurance Ca1Pany This Is to certify that this mop or plat and the coney on which It is bored sere made in mccodance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Del* Requirements for ALTA/HSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA ond AMPS, and includes Nees 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(o), 7(o), 7(bXl), 8, 9, 10(o), 1000, II, 13, 16, 17, 19 and 20 of Toole A thereof. The fieldwerk cos completed on konuory 25, 2021. Dote of Plat or lAop. Februory 2. 2021 Chest aies1.4 4C,1( AtowA16' ex A. Terwedo Inv/mote license No. 53536 clefeedoliefneurvey.com EDINA MULTIFAMILY KATWC_LDE\ALUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD\PlanSheets \C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL '0" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF Cl/ACRE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION. CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FORA RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A or RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL RE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5 ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: -PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DMSION. 17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION. MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER ADA). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST 131/1P'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FORA SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO RE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MWDOT SPECIFICATION. 17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF EDINA AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 31 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 41 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25 ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS. 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: - DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS -ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT. THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5 ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 15 AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING d COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6' ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED 'STORM SEWER'. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 16. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. 82100387 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1101 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 DATED 4/02/2021 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA• APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHEET NUMBER C100 TREE REMOVAL (TOP) TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (IVP.) ASPHALT _ REMOVAL PROPOSED Iv -0 SAWCUT UNE (TOP.) DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES PROPERTY LINE REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING CLEARING S GRUBBING FULL DEPTH SAWCUT REMOVE TREE 3on X //////////// • REMOVE CONCRETE CURBS GUTTER • X•X•X•X•X•X•X • REMOVE UTILITY LINES PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN CITY OF EDINt EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL APR 12 2021 EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY PARE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE LINE 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACIUTIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER_ THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARDOR THE CITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WTH RESPECTIVE UTIUTY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE %MTH 7HE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANYS FORCES AND AN FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TOP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CURB REMOVAL (TYP) REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE ASPHALT REMOVAL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS -"" PAVEMENT MARKINGS rr ir; *V1411111r .#7Z1 z _ _ REMOVE STARS AND RAILING REMOVE EXISTING ---1-1W SPRINKLER SYSTEM TREE REMOVAL(TYP.) S. EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STORM SEN/ER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION — - - — _ 70TH STREET WEST (BO FOOT WOE PUBUG RIGHT Cr WAY) ELECTRICAL. TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS UNES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A S/AOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTIUTIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. B CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBIJC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDINA 'COUNTY> COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WU. BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION 10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR 12 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK NUN ME FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO ME SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WIN 7HE CITY OF EDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION VALI BE PROVIDED. 13 REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS 14 ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES 15 IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 15. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ATA PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. LEGEND FILL & ABANDON UTIUTY LINES GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) li CONCRETE REMOVAL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) UMITS OF. DISTURBANCE (TYP.) (1 CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN - AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND BE -- 4 PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP-) ls CONCRETE REMOVAL CL EAR AND — GRUB (TOP) REMOVE EXISTING —.-- PAVEMENT MARKINGS )is EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN — AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) • CURB REMOVAL (TOP.) 5) ASPHALT REMOVAL REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) I I I LII _ EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED I, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION N ' EXISTING SANITARY ) SEWER EASEMENT • —NZ — — — — REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND RE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE I (TNT.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYR) s'& -1, &V"' 1> 4'0'4' 'V " ' V"' 0 4.4._ ~'REMOVE EXISTING V . _ •.— .., REMOVE EXISTING !VP.) GAS METER CLEAR AND ? 4,,, ,:...* TRANSFORMER 0 1 0 ; TREE REMOVAL (TOP.) J. .,., 0 ‘,,,, REMOVE EXIS-TING / PAVEMENT MARKINGS N >t TREE REMOVAL (TYP ) CONCRETE REMOVAL ,t ,ar ' .1167:43V PTREE R AL (TY .) ' ro...i, re CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) O !NTS OF STURSANGE (TYP.) — — PROPOSED SAWCUT UNE (TYP.) GAS TEL CIV EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING CURBS GUTTER UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ASPHALT REMOVAL (04,956V1) — TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) 6 THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK_ 6 ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING MATH THE WORK 0.0.0.0.0 • • . • • • _ O—ELC wozosmonreinzaao 1 /////J I' 2 I— z WC u) ce 0 w Z 1.1 L 1 LT, fI, a. a EDINA MULTIFAMILY SHEET NUMBER C200 K \TWC_LDEV \LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 DesigMCAMPlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am K: \TVVC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \CAD \PlanSheets\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am LEGEND X X PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE TREE MITIGATION DATA PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL: 18 TREES -71 PROTECTED TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED: 2 TREES *.1 'PROTECTED TREES MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF BUILDING PAD, DECK OR PATIO OF A NEW OR REMODELED BUILDING, WITHIN 5 FOOT RADIUS OF DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS, WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. 'PROTECTED TREES MUST BE REPLACED HATH ONE TREE OF SIMILAR SPECIES. TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1. PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. // NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3. SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 5 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5. TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 1 0 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) (TYP.) Il ts 15 NOTE: ONLY SIGNIFICANT TREES IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN ON PLAN/ INVENTORY. DRIP LINE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TREE PROTECTION SIGN 3 TAG A SPECIES CAL IN. / HT. STATUS REQUIRES REPLACEMENT 1 DECIDUOUS 18 IN. REMOVED YES 2 DECIDUOUS 8 IN. REMOVED NO 3 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 4 DECIDUOUS 12 IN. REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 10 IN. REMOVED NO 6 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 7 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 8 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 0 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO ID DECIDUOUS 15IN. REMOVED NO 1 DECIDUOUS 181N. REMOVED NO 12 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 13 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 14 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED NO 16 DECIDUOUS 24 IN. SAVED NO 17 DECIDUOUS 20 IN. REMOVED NO 18 DECIDUOUS 14 IN. REMOVED NO 19 DECIDUOUS 15 IN. REMOVED YES >- LL Z ° LO I— I= Z < z LLI 1-1 > • Z 2.1 Z st( LLJ eL — w Lu LU • eL :A I a a * • a * * * • * a a a * * a 2 CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. MEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS. 70TH STREET WEST TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT EDINA MULTIFAMILY SCALE: N.T.S. C300 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION z SHEET NUMBER C300 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY BUILDING AREA 31,446 SF (45.8% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) SURFACE ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS 4 STALLS / 4 STALLS UNDERGROUND ADA STALLS RUM / PROVIDED CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTIUDES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS S POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELDS NOWAK INC, DATED 02/02/2021. APR 1 2 2021 7. EDINA MULTIFAMILY K: \TWC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAMPlanSheets C4-SITE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 24 STALLS LEGEND PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPERTY SUMMARY EDINA MULTIFAMILY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 88,634 SF (1.57 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 50,836 SF (1.16 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 17,798 SF (0.41 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PCO-3 (PLANNEDCOMMERCIAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PARKING SETBACKS ROAD = 10' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 35' SIDE = 10' REAR = 10' BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PARKING KEYNOTE LEGEND 10. PARKING SETBACK O --- rrr 7 4 3.5' BUILDING SETBACK GARDEN RAIN • • Z.• r rrr :r/ rrr ,=0 •• p LARGE BLOCK RETAINING WALL. 1 DESIGNED BY OTHERS. . CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP J DRAWINGS FOR ENGINEERS REVIEW AND APPROVAL. COLOR TO BE SPECIFIED BY OWNER Kr BUILDING SETBACK ? , PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING - 118 UNITS * * * 0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK ® 6' CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD 0 MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURBS GUTTER O ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP OE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN O ACCESSIBLE PARKING O AREA STRIPED BATH SYSL 45' 2 O.C. O STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT OI LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS O TRUNCATED DOME RAMP OK HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT O 8612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) OM TRANSITION CURB NO FLAT CURB 0 4' ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE • CONCRETE PAVEMENT 10 PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 1 SPACE/4 RESIDENTS BASED ON MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE BUILDING, PLUS ONE SPACE/EMPLOYEE ON THE MAJOR SHIFT, PLUS ONE SPACE PER VEHICLE OWNED BY THE BUILDING'S MANAGEMENT VI REQUIRED PARKING * * * PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PARKING 86 STALLS SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND OSHA STANDARDS. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS RAIN COMMUNITY • GARDEN * * * * * 3 ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE ID UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE F. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. S. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. MALEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8 TOTAL LAND AREA IS 1 57 AC RES PLANNING DEPARTMENT PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH/ MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWSE 12 REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 11 REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. IS ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. IS ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17. THERE ARE <XXX> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. 18 FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. CONCRETE PAD FOR PUBUC ART. ART PIECE TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • * * * * T\'- LILEZG SETBACK b * * * ITEM 5 * * * 11(11fi h.- 10 I BUILDING SETBACK - - 70TH STREET WEST (CA PC.S L PE 5:OS1- ,4,) z 0 H 0 LL 0 40 —I 0_ 2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET — 0 10 20 J 0 +I — % —X-1-- SHEET NUMBER C400 871 00 00 871.00 I I I II 9.8.1 )1 ft 71. P.1E 8654 /1)/./ (ME864 89)-)7186E-867 92 ST-7 R 1/ 7 I 7,1U, PROPOSE a RAIN GARD N SURFACE IE: 865.43 ENGINEERED SOIL MEDINDRAINTILEIE: 861.85 YEAR H • 881.8 ST-15 RE 865 43 IE'.661.57 SW 7 IE 861.7 NE/ Ij O CIEIED(X). 21 LF 15. 4,41 (G 868 55 1 E 6 4 09 1E 864 00 NE I G8)033 •-•:: 1 47% 10). 866.58 1-> II, • ST-6 /1741 • 41..M.9 RE 867.51 , 6). .\\ ,,, 3 1E861.96 NE, 0 0E09 1E-862.06 SE / ,7:862200 -- , 32 17 - 29 LF - 17 00.76% ST-19 RE868 36 17 /4 I/ 1E86362 NW / ST-3 /463.64 G.667 1E863,66 E ,L, 1E863.52 S '1, RE 866 03 1E862 22 5 \,......__ ._,,_... ,... 78.6??? NW OEM) G 866 29 ,.......__.*:1 49' LF- 12' ®070% ST-21 1E663 68 SW 79 LF - 15 0650% G 866 17 0" CHAMBER INFILT. SYSTE BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 881.25 00-YEAR I-11A,L• 884 92 ,/ ST-2 IE 86222 N - 4 LF 151 @ 000% G 865.80) ST-S RE 86727 '1E863 84 SE 11 LF ST-20 1E863 °*%-roL, 61 LF 131 fl_ e \ (0 858.90 870.56) ST 12 87077IE 866 00 W 871.00 (5559.00 ( 8 70 6 7) G 859 INV 871 CO BW 859.53 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 3- 7 196 LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR 925 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) • PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT r:o PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER 00.00 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION L1(11:73)- PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION GOD(-11 PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION T60(); PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION MCd9X .' PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION (ffFA)3 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 0 0% PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 000% PROPOSED ADA SLOPE GRADING PLAN NOTES 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM 0-76 HOPE 0' - 112. PER AASHTO 91-252 HDPE OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM 13-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM 0261, 0-990, AND C-443 HOPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM 123034, JOINTS PER ASTM 123212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF MAY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. I GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE 9 ALL EXCESS MATERIAL BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. ID. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANO GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE 869 32 ,R0 S D RAIN GARD ISURFACE IE: 889.00 ENGINEERED SOIL IMEDINDRAINTILE IE: 864.00 1 i 1130-YEAR FIWL: 866. 8 10 (871.00 z \ A j 12 INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <41 CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS 13 UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <41 OF TOPSOIL>. 14 ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15 GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED MC IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR MULES EXCEED 2% (t 5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES 5:87011 • .80 T3' I A 10 88 L TJ -K 7 16. 17. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 05% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE INSULATION BY 5' WOE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4. OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. II 871 00 ) tl~N N III 7870 06 Fro V 70TH ST-REET WEST - - -------- - 87/00 ,--(871.00) {4871.00 10 ROOF DRAIN S-WERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 10 ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE MR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE OATH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 125% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22 CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT 'INFALL CURB. WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND 'OUTFALL' CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 11 I PLANNING DEPARTMENT • m E 069.07 66964--( 868 42 786802) ••\ 0 I- CC 0 UN u_ I- z - a_ KATVVC_LDEV \ LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD \PlanSheets \CS-GRADING PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07am „ = g >% O `; ki CU L115,WN E z In o w • J z z• 0 Qa a g '41 O cc EDINA MULTIFAMILY I- a 2 u) _ re 0 Lu 2 Z O LU a wl < LU a. a SHEET NUMBER C500 K:\TNC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \CAMPlanSheets \C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am EDINA MULTIFAMILY LEGEND EXISTING 1-7-1 8 0 IV O IY PROPOSED • GATE VALVE 4▪ - HYDRANT REDUCER )14 TEE 0 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE Ig) SANITARY CLEANOUT WATERMAN 11119 SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER STORM SEWER ELC UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC COM TELEPHONE OAS GASMAN UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1 ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES 2 SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BEM FOLLOWS B' PVC SDR35 PER ASTM 5-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12 DEEP B' PVC SOR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 17 DEEP 6' PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM 04785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWNA C150 3 WATER IJ NES SHALL BEM FOLLOWS. 6. AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4. MD LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA CI80 SMALLER THAN 3. PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE 'R PER ANSI 816 22 OR PVC, 200 P S I • PER ASTM 01764 AND D2241. 4 MINIMUM TRENCH MINH SHALL BE 2 FEET 5 ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS PATH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR M INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS 6 ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN ocr) APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF T-F COVER ON ALL WATERLINES 8. IN THE EVENT OFA VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH 400R C900 PATH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 113. VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21 11 (AWWA 0151) (CLASS 50) B. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BAC KEELING. CI PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 10 TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.SI. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER UNES II 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE_ THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTIUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ffi 18. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS 18 CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN A 19 BACKFLOW DEVICES (DOCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20 ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. A 21. ALL WATERMAN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. n DATA CONDUITS (SEE ARCH PLANS) 554 IE 858 25 S PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED WATER METER-, REMOTE READ LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ELECTRICAL METER PANEL LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) TRANSFORMER SWITCH (ELS) (SEE ARCH. PLANS) rt 10' WATER SERVICE to,e4 1E858.07 N IE 848.55 W IE 046 05 E CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION OF INVERTS II --- CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TELECOM CONNECTION PATH TELECOM PROVIDER -7---1 , , CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL CONNECTION WITH . - . EXISTING ELECTRICAL HAND HOLE ' .- CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GAS CONNECTION HATH GAS PROVIDER CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAN. COORDINATE REQUIRED SHUTOFF WITH CITY. 70TH STREET WEST GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 (99 9 - 11,1 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER C600 PICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATK BHS SYRINGA RETICULATA JTL RVB 6 BETULA NIGRA SIZE 6' HT. SIZE 6' HT. 6' HT. SIZE CONT CAL B&B CONT CAL B&B B&B CONT CAL B & B 2.5" CAL. B&B 2.5' CAL. CONT SPACING SIZE CONT SPACING SIZE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY 0 GOJ 16 TAU 14 C TGA 13 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA 'GREY OWL' TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'BAILJOHN' TM BDP 30 BLC 19 GLS 39 LON 55 LQF 16 SEM 60 SYRINGA X 'SMSJBP7' TM AROMA MELANOCARPA 'IROQUOIS BEAUTY' TM RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS 'DONNA MAY' TM HYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'SMHPLQF' TM SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA 'SEM' 149 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 'GOLDSTURM' BES NEPETA X FAASSENII 'KIT KAT' SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS ECHINACEA X 'POW WOW WILDBERRY' HEMEROCALLIS X 'ROSY RETURNS' KKC 95 PDS 29 PWW 18 RRD 41 AST BLU BLV 52 ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAE 35 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 42 VERBENA HASTATA OXE PBS 42 HELIOPSIS HELIANTHOIDES 147 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT. 4' O.C. TAUTON YEW #5 CONT. 4' O.C. TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE #5 CONT. 3' O.C. COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD BLOOMERANG DARK PURPLE LILAC #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. 4' O.C. #5 CONT. #5 CONT. 3' O.C. CONT SIZE SPACING 18' OC 81 CONT GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANGEA SEM FALSESPIREA COMMON NAME BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18' O.C. CONT SIZE SPACING FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 36' OC FLAT 2' PLUGS 18' OC FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC KIT KAT CATMINT #1 CONT 18" OC PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC POW WOW VVILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC ROSY RETURNS DAYLILY COMMON NAME NEW ENGLAND ASTER LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS BLUE VERVAIN JOE PYE WEED OX-EYE SUNFLOWER PRAIRIE BLAZINGSTAR FIAT 18" OC 53 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT KFG 4- LDN RRD 2- BOP 5- TGA 4- LDN 15 BES PL K \TVVC_LDEV\ LUPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \ 3 Design \CAD\PlanSheets\ L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am 2-RTD 24 - JPW 3 - RVB 9- OXE 6 - AST 3-RTO 3 - BLU 4- OXE 14 - PBS 5 - BLV 29 - JPW 2 - RID LANDSCAPE LEGEND PLANT SCHEDULE CONIFEROUS TREE 0 ORNAMENTAL TREE OVERSTORY TREE RAIN GARDEN 0 CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME ABM 2 GSL 1 CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME RTD 33 CORNUS SERICEA 'BAILADELINE' COMMON NAME BLACK HILLS SPRUCE COMMON NAME JAPANESE TREE LILAC CLUMP RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK COMMON NAME AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN COMMON NAME FIREDANCE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT. 4' O.C. EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD I IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEEDI SOD EDGE (TYP.) 15 JPW 2 - RTD 3 - RVB 5 - BLV 8 - OXE 16 - JPW 3 - RTO 9 - AST 4 - BLV 5 - BLU 2 - RTD 18 - PBS "e'C • .47 --o _o iffr ° eimee000c,0004ye•Hre0000ecooveee*, triPA cailv (4.re ' 3 - AST 5 - BLV 4- OXE 4 - AST 6 - BLU 3 - BLV 29 - PBS 32 - JPW 5-LQF 3 -ACD 4-SEM 4 - SEM 3 -ACD NUM 3 - LQF 2 - BOP m_ I. ROCK MULCH (TYP.) COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA- DETAILS TED REVISIONS 18 - PBS 6 - AST 4 - RTD 5 - BLV 6- OXE 7 - BLU 35 - PBS 29 - JPW 9 - AST 23 - JPW 3 - BLC 0 g.g 2 -GOJ 00 9 - RRD 5 - LDN 6" f04 5 ll'oy 1 K9 - TGA 4 / ,c44,44.Weiralirtreko Nto rg rolevreasitr ,--,g, tett:11 70TH STREET WEST PO FOOT WOE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY) DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME ACD 6 CORNUS SERICEA 'ALLEMAN'S COMPACT CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME CODE DIV BOTANICAL NAME JPW 226 EUPATORIUM MACULATUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS TREES REQUIRED: 26 TREES = 1,039 FEET PERIMETER / 40 TREES PROVIDED: 26 TREES OFF-STREET PARKING SCREENING: MUST BE 4 FEET ABOVE LEVEL OF PARKING LOT WITH MINIMUM OPACITY OF 90 PERCENT YEAR ROUND. IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT. 4' O.C. 30" OC NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 IMMMI z I- z ELu o_g (f) Lij o• 0 '<cc Pu" 0 g W a. < 0 SHEET NUMBER L100 61 - BES 31 - KKC 22 - GLS 2 - BDP 5- LDNI 12 - KKC - BES `a' PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS 12 -KKC FFE: 871.00 12 -BES P1 FFE: 859.00 7-SEM 5-LDN m ▪ —3-LDN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1-ABM 12 - GLS LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES OA O EDGER (TYP.) O DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) O ROCK MULCH (TYP.) 0 SOD (TYP.) EDINA MULTIFAMILY 2 - BHS 3 - BDP 2 - LON 4-GOJ 3-BDP111 7- PDS,11 • 2 - JTL 11 1 10- LDN 11 T, I 4- GOJ 2 - BHS 2 - LDN 3 - BDP 5 - SEM 9-PDS 2-TAU 3-BDP Weif FENCING - SEE ARCH AND CML PLANS ti 3 - LDN 2 - BHS 3 - BLC 4 - SEM 5- PW/V 3 - BDP 3 - BLC ;ITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 \NNING DEPARTMENT A 2 - BHS 2- GOJ 3 - BDP 12 - KKC 4 - SEM 3 - BLC 3 - LDN 3 - BOP 2 - TAU 5 - SEM 13 - RRD • n n n ACER X FREEMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE' TILIA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE' 0 0 0 0 0 0 PERENNIALS RAIN GARDEN iii . Mat rrz EDINA MULTIFAMILY 5 I- z w E (i) a ce ce O 11 1 Z a- w- g_ 0- g a NOTES: LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2' ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4. SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5. BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 7. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10. FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. NOTES: 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 1. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL 5. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6. BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8. MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL L101 L101 SCALE: N.T.S 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. MULCH AT PLANTING AREA CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDNIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. L101 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS. AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24. RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL 25. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4' IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHEET NUMBER L101 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH REVISIONS EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6' BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PLANTING SOIL --- - ................... WERan= =WATAilAr n=11=11= i11= 11= = 1=11 -11=11- =ri=" =11=11=11=11=n=I TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE N.T.S. TURF/SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER MULCH SECTION PLAN STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S. L101 3/16' X 4" STEEL EDGER TURF/SOD 12' STEEL EDGER SPIKE TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD MULCH SUBGRADE SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4' DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE FINISHED GRADE SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2,1' K: \TWC_LDEV1UPE DEVELOPMENTEdina Multifamily \3 Design \ CAD \ PlanSheets \L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08am W 70TH STREET W 69TH STREET W 66TH STREET FRANCE AVE SVALLEY VIEW ROADW 72ND STREET DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNHKDHKDBMWNORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ARCH full bleed D (36.00 x 24.00 Inches) SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN A. HYLLESTED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE: (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. 1229 TYLER STREET NE SUITE 100 TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER A. TERWEDO ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER LUPE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS 1701 MADISON ST NE, SUITE 111 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 436-3200 EDINA MULTIFAMILY FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT POPE ARCHITECTS 1295 BANADANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108 TELEPHONE: (651) 642-9200 SITE BENCHMARKS: (LOCATIONS SHOWN ON SURVEY) SBM #1 TOP OF MNDOT GEODETIC MONUMENT "2733 Q" GSID STATION #95550 ELEVATION=874.82 (NAVD 88) SBM #2 TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 70TH STREET WEST ELEVATION=872.55 (NAVD 88) BENCHMARKS 4040 70TH STREET WEST SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 28N, RANGE 24W BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:06amPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC000EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMNSheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title C000 COVER SHEET V100 ALTA SURVEY C100 GENERAL NOTES C200 DEMO PLAN C300 TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS FORREFERENCEONLYNOT TO SCALE, FOR REFERENCE ONLY BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\V1-ALTA SURVEY.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNHKDHKDBMWPREPARED FORALTA SURVEYV100EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" (LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES, SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK, EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. 3.THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE, SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO USE FOR SUCH WORK. 4.IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE 48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION PERMITS. 7.ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER. 8.ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 10.ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED. 11.ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS MADE. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER. 13.SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION, THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES: - PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION, INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES 3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: - DENSITY TEST REPORTS - BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM - PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER - LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS - ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY WATER STORM SEWER & SANITARY SEWER NOTES 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 2.ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. 4.DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS. 5.ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 6.WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES BEING BROUGHT ON SITE. 7.ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 8.UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MN PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO BACK FILLING. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18" BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES. 11.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 12.ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER". EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE. 14.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 15.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 16.ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 17.ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES. ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN. 18.ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED. 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 20.THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 21.A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED. 22.GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 23.COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. 24.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS. 25.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS. 26.REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 27.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS. 28.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING. GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES 1.GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES. 5.BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED. 6.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED. 7.AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE DISCOVERED. 8.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 9.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS. 10.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 11.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MN/DOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 12.ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS. THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN. 13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION. 14.SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN 48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 16.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATION. 17.ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF EDINA AND MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. 18.SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 19.LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN. 20.IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 21.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT COMPENSATION. 22.BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE. 23.ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BLANKET. 24.ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 25.ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 26.CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING. EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. 2.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MN NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. 3.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. 4.SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR. 5.TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. 8.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. 9.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. 10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. 11.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. 12.ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE. 13.ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY. 14.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION, SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS. 15.EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT. 16.ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DIVISION. 17.IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION. 1.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 2.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 3.THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 4.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5.ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION. PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS. 2.ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS. 3.CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES, PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS, AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 4.ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB. 5.THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET. 6.ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT. 7.THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE PRACTICE. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 9.ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER AND OWNER. 10.BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES (PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 11.MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET. REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. B2100387 BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1101 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 DATED 4/02/2021 BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C1-GENERAL NOTES.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNHKDHKDBMWPREPARED FORGENERAL NOTESC100EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN ITEM 5ITEM 5VALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST867868869870868869 870871 870871872873874875875873 8728718 7 0 869 869868 869 869870867866 865 BUILDING DEMOLITION MULTI-STORY BUILDING 10,442 SF CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) ASPHALT REMOVAL EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.)TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) ASPHALT REMOVAL ASPHALT REMOVAL ASPHALT REMOVAL TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.) CLEAR AND GRUB (TYP.)EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) TREE REMOVAL (TYP.) EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE REMOVED EXISTING STORM SEWER TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED EXISTING RETAINING WALL TO BE REMOVED REMOVE STAIRS AND RAILING REMOVE STAIRS AND RAILING REMOVE EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE REMOVAL CONCRETE REMOVAL ASPHALT REMOVAL PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CONCRETE REMOVAL PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CURB REMOVAL (TYP.) CONCRETE REMOVAL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE REMOVE EXISTING TRANSFORMER REMOVE EXISTING GAS METER LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.)LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE (TYP.) PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING SIGNAGE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN AND BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDINA, <COUNTY> COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF EDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES NORTH LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNHKDHKDBMWPREPARED FORDEMO PLANC200EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN BIKES 101 COMMUNITY 102 MAIL 103 ELEVATOR LOBBY 104 FITNESS 106 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 MAINTENANCE OFFICE 109 LAUNDRY 110 MECH 111 OFFICE-2 112 OFFICE-1 113 PACKAGES 114 LOUNGE 115 LOBBY 116 WORK ROOM 117 STORAGE 118 STORAGE 119 ART 120 EXIT 121 Room 122 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00VALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 11 13 12 14 15 17 10 76 18 19 16 B B B B B B B BB B B B B B B B B B A C C C C LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE TO BE REMOVED PROPERTY LINE TREE TO REMAIN LEGEND TREE PROTECTION SIGN FURNISH AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIPLINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SPECIFIED, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHEN POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25 FEET BEYOND THE DRIP LINE. PLACE PROTECTION SIGNS ALONG FENCE AT 20' INTERVALS. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS DRIP LINE PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL: 18 TREES PROTECTED TREE MITIGATION REQUIRED:2 TREES *PROTECTED TREES MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF BUILDING PAD, DECK OR PATIO OF A NEW OR REMODELED BUILDING, WITHIN 5 FOOT RADIUS OF DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS, WITHIN 10 FOOT RADIUS OF INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS. *PROTECTED TREES MUST BE REPLACED WITH ONE TREE OF SIMILAR SPECIES. TREE MITIGATION DATA 1.PRUNING WILL BE DONE BY PROFESSIONALS DURING APPROPRIATE PRUNING SEASON. 2.NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS, OPERATION OF MACHINERY, OR DEVELOPMENT OF ANY SORT WILL OCCUR WITHIN THE FENCE-LINE WITHOUT APPROVAL IN WRITING FROM CITY. 3.SITE GRADING TO BE DONE ONLY AFTER PROTECTIVE MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN, CITY HAS APPROVED FENCING LOCATIONS, AND ALL CONTRACTORS HAVE BEEN BREIFED ON TREE PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES. 4.EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN OR REMOVED TO BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED, WITHIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS AND 10' OUTSIDE OF THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS. 5.TREE PRESERVATION TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER AND PER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY. TREE PROTECTION NOTES TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION FENCE PLACEMENT SCALE: N.T.S.C3001 KEYNOTE LEGEND EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) (TYP.) A B C D TREE PROTECTION FENCE NOTE: ONLY SIGNIFICANT TREES IN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN ON PLAN/ INVENTORY. EXISTING VEGETATION EDGE TAG #SPECIES CAL IN. / HT.STATUS REQUIRES REPLACEMENT 1 DECIDUOUS 18 IN.REMOVED YES 2 DECIDUOUS 8 IN.REMOVED NO 3 DECIDUOUS 24 IN.REMOVED NO 4 DECIDUOUS 12 IN.REMOVED NO 5 DECIDUOUS 10 IN.REMOVED NO 6 DECIDUOUS 14 IN.REMOVED NO 7 DECIDUOUS 14 IN.REMOVED NO 8 DECIDUOUS 24 IN.REMOVED NO 9 DECIDUOUS 24 IN.REMOVED NO 10 DECIDUOUS 15 IN.REMOVED NO 11 DECIDUOUS 18 IN.REMOVED NO 12 DECIDUOUS 15 IN.REMOVED NO 13 DECIDUOUS 15 IN.REMOVED NO 14 DECIDUOUS 24 IN.REMOVED NO 15 DECIDUOUS 15 IN.REMOVED NO 16 DECIDUOUS 24 IN.SAVED NO 17 DECIDUOUS 20 IN.REMOVED NO 18 DECIDUOUS 14 IN.REMOVED NO 19 DECIDUOUS 15 IN.REMOVED YES BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-TREE INVENTORY AND PRESERVATION PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL G. COOKAS, PLA04/12/202156522DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNPWBPWBMGCPREPARED FORTREE INVENTORYANDPRESERVATIONPLANC300EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN ITEM 5ITEM 5 BIKES 101 COMMUNITY 102 MAIL 103 ELEVATOR LOBBY 104 FITNESS 106 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 MAINTENANCE OFFICE 109 LAUNDRY 110 MECH 111 OFFICE-2 112 OFFICE-1 113 PACKAGES 114 LOUNGE 115 LOBBY 116 WORK ROOM 117 STORAGE 118 STORAGE 119 ART 120 EXIT 121 Room 122 9. 0 ' 9.0' 9.0'18.0'18.0'12.0 '10.0'10.0'10.0'35. 0 ' 10. 0 '24.0'8.0' 10' PARKING SETBACK 35' BUILDING SETBACK 8.0'8.0'10' BUILDING SETBACK 10' BUILDING SETBACK 10' BUILDING SETBACK A A A A A A C C C C C CC D D D D D D C C F G H H H II I K L L L L L L L N M M LARGE BLOCK RETAINING WALL. DESIGNED BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ENGINEER'S REVIEW AND APPROVAL. COLOR TO BE SPECIFIED BY OWNER. OO J J J J J J 8.0 '15.5'30.0' I20.1'20.1'6.0'P P Q Q A A20.1'I I A A O O RAIN GARDEN RAIN GARDEN COMMUNITY GARDENVALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING - 118 UNITS 6.0'6.0'L CONCRETE PAD FOR PUBLIC ART. ART PIECE TO BE SUPPLIED BY OWNER. B B 8.0' E C C H C C BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) BUILDING AREA 31,446 SF (45.8% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 1 SPACE/4 RESIDENTS BASED ON MAXIMUM CAPACITY OF THE BUILDING, PLUS ONE SPACE/EMPLOYEE ON THE MAJOR SHIFT, PLUS ONE SPACE PER VEHICLE OWNED BY THE BUILDING'S MANAGEMENT PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 24 STALLS PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PARKING 86 STALLS SURFACE ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS UNDERGROUND ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 4 STALLS / 4 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY EDINA MULTIFAMILY TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 50,836 SF (1.16 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 17,798 SF (0.41 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 68,634 SF (1.57 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PCD-3 (PLANNED COMMERCIAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) PARKING SETBACKS ROAD = 10' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 35' SIDE = 10' REAR = 10' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREA PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS TRUNCATED DOME RAMP HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB FLAT CURB 4' ALUMINUM PICKET FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q SITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC., DATED 02/02/2021. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS 1.57 ACRES. 9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 16.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 9' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 17.THERE ARE <X.XX> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. 18.FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS.BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNBMWRAVBMWPREPARED FORSITE PLANC400EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMNNORTH BIKES 101 COMMUNITY 102 MAIL 103 ELEVATOR LOBBY 104 FITNESS 106 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 MAINTENANCE OFFICE 109 LAUNDRY 110 MECH 111 OFFICE-2 112 OFFICE-1 113 PACKAGES 114 LOUNGE 115 LOBBY 116 WORK ROOM 117 STORAGE 118 STORAGE 119 ART 120 EXIT 121 Room 122 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00VALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST875875871 871872872873873874874870 867868869866867868869870870870870869869 869870868869870867868 8698 6 7 8 6 8 870 870DDD D 8598608618628638648658708698688678668658648648658668664 LF - 15" @ 0.00% 32 LF - 15" @ 0.50% 79 LF - 15" @ 0.50% 35 LF - 15" @ 0.55% 29 LF - 12" @ 0.75% 86 LF - 12" @ 2.50% 61 LF - 8" @ 2.50% 37 LF - 15" @ 0.55% 96 LF - 12" @ 0.70% 21 LF - 15" @ 1.47% 11 LF - 18" @ 1.50% 1.80%2.20% 1 . 2 0% 3.12%3.88%3. 6 2% 2 . 9 1% 3. 2 3 % 1.65% 4.1 3 % 6. 1 1 %2.05% 11.2 5 %33.33%3:13: 1 6.30% 3 . 7 1% 6.78%20.42%15.56%7.73%6.88% 4.06% 9.87% G:859.00 G:858.90 G:859.00 G:858.90G:866.51 G:866.70 G:866.29 G:866.58 G:867.48 G:867.68 G:867.51 G:867.37 T/G:870.80 T/G:870.80 T/G:870.42 T/G:870.62 G:870.33G:868.55 G:867.91 G:868.39 G:868.30 G:868.09 TW:867.97 BW:867.22 TW:870.91 BW:859.43 TW:871.00 BW:859.53G:869.27 G:870.00 G:870.17 G:869.75 G:870.11 G:869.97 G:869.93 1.50%1.47% 1.80% 2 . 1 6%2.83%1.71% 3.4 9 %3.14%3 . 5 3%20.76%11.92%4.11%4.50%TW:867.15 BW:866.52 TW:870.00 BW:864.10 G:863.40 G:865.80 G:866.17 G:868.61 G:868.09 G:867.94 ME:867.38 ME:865.48 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00 871.00867.93 870.36 870.45 870.45 867.86 867.95 2.20% 7.3 9 % 7.3 5 % 1.88% 7.20% 2.00% 6.64% 6.80%6.70%7.13 % 6.95 % 6. 5 3 % 6.84%2.12%2.43%1.80%7.69% 9. 8 9 % 871.00 871.00871.00 ME:865.34 ME:864.89 ME:869.06 ME:869.32 ME:870.06 ME:870.04 870.94 870.56 870.26 870.17 869.39 870.25 870.12 870.08 869.74 869.74 868.64 ME:869.07 ME:868.02 868.42 ST-16 RE:869.00 IE:862.87 N ST-18 RE:868.09 IE:864.00 NE ST-19 RE:868.36 IE:863.62 NW IE:863.86 E IE:863.52 SST-3 RE:868.03 IE:862.22 S IE:862.22 NW ST-5 RE:867.51 IE:862.06 SE IE:862.20 S IE:861.96 NE ST-8 RE:867.37 IE:863.84 SE ST-12 IE:866.00 W ST-11 IE:866.00 W ST-7 RE:864.92 IE:861.26 SW IE:861.16 N ST-1 IE:860.97 S ST-15 RE:865.43 IE:861.57 SW IE:861.47 NE ST-13 IE:864.49 E ST-2 IE:862.22 N ST-20 IE:863.36 N ST-21 IE:863.68 SW 870.91 870.77 870.67 870.79 870.70 869.66 869.66 867.88 867.75 867.81 867.72 3.06%1.77%2.60%2.05%0.80%0.80%0.41% 0 . 9 5% 1. 1 3% 0 . 9 9% 1.23 %1.00%2.29 %1.31 %1.90% 2. 4 8% 1.5 0 % 60" CHAMBER INFILT. SYSTEM BOTTOM OF CHAMBER: 861.25 100-YEAR HWL: 864.92 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN SURFACE IE: 869.00 ENGINEERED SOIL MEDIA/DRAINTILE IE: 864.00 100-YEAR HWL: 866.28 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN SURFACE IE: 865.43 ENGINEERED SOIL MEDIA/DRAINTILE IE: 861.85 100-YEAR HWL: 861.89 8.12%8.12%1.90%7.0 3 % 7.7 6 %2.12%870.19 869.91 NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:07amDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNDSSDSSBMWPREPARED FORGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC500EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113 BIKES 101 COMMUNITY 102 MAIL 103 ELEVATOR LOBBY 104 FITNESS 106 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 MAINTENANCE OFFICE 109 LAUNDRY 110 MECH 111 OFFICE-2 112 OFFICE-1 113 PACKAGES 114 LOUNGE 115 LOBBY 116 WORK ROOM 117 STORAGE 118 STORAGE 119 ART 120 EXIT 121 Room 122 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00VALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST SS-2 IE:858.07 N IE: 846.86 W IE: 846.85 E CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION OF INVERTS SS-1 IE:858.25 S 9 LF - 8" PVC@ 2.00%DATA CONDUITS (SEE ARCH. PLANS) TRANSFORMER SWITCH (ELS) (SEE ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED WATER METER REMOTE READ LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) PROPOSED GAS METER LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TELECOM CONNECTION WITH TELECOM PROVIDER CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE GAS CONNECTION WITH GAS PROVIDER CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ELECTRICAL CONNECTION WITH EXISTING ELECTRICAL HAND HOLE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN. COORDINATE REQUIRED SHUTOFF WITH CITY. ELECTRICAL METER PANEL LOCATION (SEE ARCH. PLANS) 10" WATER SERVICE EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN04/12/202153113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNHKDHKDBMWPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC600EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN LANDSCAPE KEYNOTESLANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) SEED/ SOD EDGE (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) COMMUNITY GARDEN AREA- DETAILS TBD FENCING - SEE ARCH AND CIVIL PLANS A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) A B C DDDD D VALLEY VIEW ROAD70TH STREET WEST BIKES 101 COMMUNITY 102 MAIL 103 ELEVATOR LOBBY 104 FITNESS 106 TOILET 107 TOILET 108 MAINTENANCE OFFICE 109 LAUNDRY 110 MECH 111 OFFICE-2 112 OFFICE-1 113 PACKAGES 114 LOUNGE 115 LOBBY 116 WORK ROOM 117 STORAGE 118 STORAGE 119 ART 120 EXIT 121 Room 122 PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY BUILDING 118 UNITS FFE: 871.00 P1 FFE: 859.00 3 - ACD 5 - LQF 5 - LQF 4 - SEM 3 - ACD 4 - SEM 2 - BDP 3 - LQF 4 - GOJ 2 - BHS 2 - LDN 3 - BDP 5 - SEM 9 - PDS 2 - TAU 3 - BDP 3 - LDN 2 - BHS 3 - BLC 4 - SEM 5 - PWW 3 - BDP 3 - BLC 3 - TGA 3 - LDN 2 - BHS 2 - GOJ 3 - BDP 12 - KKC 4 - SEM 3 - BLC 3 - LDN 3 - BDP 2 - TAU 13 - RRD 5 - SEM 2 - BHS 3 - BDP 2 - LDN 4 - GOJ 3 - BDP 10 - LDN 7 - PDS4 - PWW 2 - BDP 14 - BES 15 - BES 4 - LDN 5 - TGA 2 - BDP 10 - RRD 4 - LDN 5 - SEM 3 - BLC 4 - JTL 5 - TAU 13 - BES 13 - PDS 9 - LDN 9 - PWW 8 - SEM 4 - BLC 5 - TGA 19 - KKC 5 - LDN 9 - RRD 2 - GOJ 3 - BLC 3 - RVB 3 - JTL 2 - JTL 23 - JPW 9 - AST 29 - JPW 35 - PBS 7 - BLU 6 - OXE 5 - BLV 4 - RTD 6 - AST 18 - PBS 3 - OXE 7 - BLU 5 - AST 34 - JPW 6 - BLV 4 - SEM 8 - KFG 9 - KFG 9 - KFG 8 - KFG 13 - KFG 22 - BES 6 - KFG 9 - RRD 9 - KKC 5 - GLS 12 - GLS 1 - ABM 3 - AST 5 - BLV 4 - OXE 4 - AST 6 - BLU 3 - BLV 29 - PBS 32 - JPW 8 - OXE 12 - RTD 7 - BLU 24 - JPW 4 - AST 3 - BLV 15 - JPW 2 - RTD 3 - RVB 5 - BLV 8 - OXE 16 - JPW 3 - RTD 9 - AST 4 - BLV 5 - BLU 18 - PBS 2 - BDP 22 - GLS 31 - KKC 61 - BES 5 - LDN 12 - KKC 12 - BES 12 - KKC 12 - BES 7 - SEM 5 - LDN 4 - GOJ 4 - SEM 6 - SEM 3 - LQF 5 - TAU 6 - BLV 6 - AST 19 - PBS 2 - RTD 24 - JPW 9 - OXE 6 - AST 3 - RTD 3 - BLU 4 - OXE 14 - PBS 5 - BLV 29 - JPW 2 - RTD 3 - RTD A B A B A B D D DD D D D D D B A C C B A B B A B A B A 2 - RTD 1 - GSL COMMUNITY GARDEN CONIFEROUS TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE BHS 8 PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA`BLACK HILLS SPRUCE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE JTL 9 SYRINGA RETICULATA JAPANESE TREE LILAC CLUMP B & B 6` HT. RVB 6 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK B & B 6` HT. OVERSTORY TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE ABM 2 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. GSL 1 TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. RAIN GARDEN CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE RTD 33 CORNUS SERICEA `BAILADELINE`FIREDANCE RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.4` O.C. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE GOJ 16 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. TAU 14 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW #5 CONT.4` O.C. TGA 13 THUJA OCCIDENTALIS `BAILJOHN` TM TECHNITO GLOBE ARBORVITAE #5 CONT.3` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE ACD 6 CORNUS SERICEA `ALLEMAN`S COMPACT`DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.4` O.C. BDP 30 SYRINGA X `SMSJBP7` TM BLOOMERANG DARK PURPLE LILAC #5 CONT. BLC 19 ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY #5 CONT.4` O.C. GLS 39 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW`GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT.4` O.C. LDN 55 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK #5 CONT.4` O.C. LQF 16 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `SMHPLQF` TM LITTLE QUICK FIRE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT. SEM 60 SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM`SEM FALSESPIREA #5 CONT.3` O.C. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING BES 149 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC KFG 53 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" OC KKC 95 NEPETA X FAASSENII `KIT KAT`KIT KAT CATMINT #1 CONT 18" OC PDS 29 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC PWW 18 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC RRD 41 HEMEROCALLIS X `ROSY RETURNS`ROSY RETURNS DAYLILY #1 CONT 18" O.C. RAIN GARDEN CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING AST 52 ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAE NEW ENGLAND ASTER FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC BLU 35 SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC BLV 42 VERBENA HASTATA BLUE VERVAIN FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC JPW 226 EUPATORIUM MACULATUM JOE PYE WEED FLAT 2" PLUGS 18" OC OXE 42 HELIOPSIS HELIANTHOIDES OX-EYE SUNFLOWER FLAT 2" PLUGS 36" OC PBS 147 LIATRIS PYCNOSTACHYA PRAIRIE BLAZINGSTAR FLAT 18" OC PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS TREES REQUIRED:26 TREES = 1,039 FEET PERIMETER / 40 TREES PROVIDED: 26 TREES OFF-STREET PARKING SCREENING: MUST BE 4 FEET ABOVE LEVEL OF PARKING LOT WITH MINIMUM OPACITY OF 90 PERCENT YEAR ROUND. NORTH BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL G. COOKAS, PLA04/12/202156522DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNPWBPWBMSCPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1012 MULCH 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE TURF/SOD SUBGRADE 12" STEEL EDGER SPIKE 3/16" X 4" STEEL EDGER4'MULCH TURF/SOD TOP OF EDGER TO BE FLUSH WITH SOD PLANSECTION STEEL EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1014SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'L1013 MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE COL-MET (OR EQUAL) STEEL EDGING; 3/16" THICK, COLOR BLACK, OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH TOP OF EDGER AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. 24.RAIN GARDEN NOTE: PROVIDE AND INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AT RAIN GARDEN AREA SIDE SLOPES AFTER ALL PLANTING HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. BLANKET TO BE ONE SEASON GEOJUTE, MN/DOT CATEGORY 2 (STRAW 1S, WOOD FIBER 1S), OR APPROVED EQUAL. BLANKET TO BE OVERLAPPED BY 4" AND ANCHORED BY SOD STAPLES. PLACE BLANKET PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE. TRENCH IN EDGES OF BLANKET AREA TO PREVENT UNDER MINING. PROVIDE SILT FENCE AT TOP OF SLOPE AS NEEDED. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO MATCH OTHER PROJECT PLANTING MULCH. PLACE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET AREA (NO FILTER FABRIC). SEE RAIN GARDEN DETAIL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. RAIN GARDEN TO PROVIDE PROPER INFILTRATION AND DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS PER ENGINEERS APPROVAL. 25.MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL PROJECT COMPLETION, BUT IN NO CASE, LESS THAN FOLLOWING PERIOD; 1 YEAR AFTER PROJECT COMPLETION. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, AND OTHER PLANTS BY PRUNING, CULTIVATING, AND WEEDING AS REQUIRED FOR HEALTHY GROWTH. RESTORE PLANTING SAUCERS. TIGHTEN AND REPAIR STAKE AND GUY SUPPORTS AND RESET TREES AND SHRUBS TO PROPER GRADES OR VERTICAL POSITION AS REQUIRED. RESTORE OR REPLACE DAMAGED WRAPPINGS. SPRAY AS REQUIRED TO KEEP TREES AND SHRUBS FREE OF INSECTS AND DISEASE. REPLENISH MULCH TO THE REQUIRED DEPTH. MAINTAIN LAWNS FOR 45 DAYS AFTER INSTALLING SOD INCLUDING MOWING WHEN SOD RECITES 4” IN HEIGHT. WEED PLANTING BEDS AND MULCH SAUCERS AT MINIMUM ONCE A MONTH DURING THE GROWING SEASON. PROVIDE A MONTHLY REPORT TO THE OWNER ON WEEDING AND OTHER MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. LANDSCAPE NOTES BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSHEET NUMBER©K:\TWC_LDEV\LUPE DEVELOPMENT\Edina Multifamily\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg April 12, 2021 - 10:08amDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL G. COOKAS, PLA04/12/202156522DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16006200104/12/2021AS SHOWNKHAKHAMGCPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEDETAILSL101EDINA MULTIFAMILYLUPE DEVELOPMENTPARTNERSEDINAMN EdinaMN.gov 1 8 Site EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 8 Site Site Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 16 Street Room Form • Building setbacks are to be considered as a part of the overall landscape and public amenities, and should be designed to create a continuous pedestrian experience along major corridors to support “pools of human activity.” • Every new development should connect all publicly-accessible spaces such as pocket parks, courtyards and plazas to the street room typology. • Along all major corridors, seventy five percent (75%) of face of building walls need to be at the setback line to support the creation of a ‘street room.’ • All new building façades in the district must have seventy five percent (75%) transparency at the ground level. • All building façades are prime (including parking) and must be designed accordingly. There is no back side of a building. • All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials facing the public realm. • Above 50-60 feet, glass, precast panels with brick/tile are the preferred material palette. Metal panel can be used as a secondary part of a wall system. • No building façade can be longer than 200’ without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. Building Form • Ground floors should have a minimum ceiling height of 20’ for flexibility. This floor-to-floor height will allow the space to accommodate commercial, two floors of parking, or two-story townhouses. • Above-grade parking structures should be designed with flat floorplates to allow for future conversion and lined with programmable public realm space to minimize the visual impact of car storage. • Within 50-60 feet of the ground, it is preferred that rooftops be programmed to accommodate residential or public user activities (e.g. a restaurant or terrace). • Rooftops facing the Promenades must be functional and programmed to provide interest and variety along these important pedestrian spines. • All development services, including rooftop mechanical systems, should be located within buildings and should not be visible from the public realm, or semi-private and private areas of the development. The exception are rooftop-mounted solar panels, which should be located on the highest point of the buildings. • Building footprints above 60 feet should be no greater than 12,000 SF for residential use and 24,000 SF for commercial space. • Design buildings for flexibility and adaptability in the future, including use of structural systems that will allow a building’s function to fundamentally change. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 17 TRANSITION AND CONNECTIONS Within the Greater Southdale District, a new network of streets will provide both commercial and resident access to new mixed- use buildings along France and York Avenues, keeping traffic out of the adjacent single family neighborhoods. These new streets offer the opportunity for new development to more gradually transition from the scale of the existing single family neighborhoods and the commercial heart of the Southdale District. New development within transition zones is expected to balance scale and building use between these single family neighborhoods and the higher density, more commercially focused Greater Southdale District. West and East Promenades The character of the West and East Promenades, new north-south streets that run to the west of France Avenue and the east of York Avenue, to are envisioned as woonerfs—shared streets for pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles. This typology creates opportunities for multiple access to buildings for both below grade parking and service, as well as temporary/short-term parking for retail and building drop offs. Within the woonerf concept, pedestrians have priority over cars, and as a shared street, cars are forced to slow down and travel with caution. Because of their organization, these streets also can support a variety of uses, with building types catered to residential uses such as townhomes, with considerations for retail space that support less intensive commercial needs of adjacent neighborhoods. The sense of scale by way of width of street to height of building is maintained by creating a street form that is no less than 60 feet high at its edges, with developments potentially increasing in height as buildings reach the edge of the boulevards, and descending in height as they move to the single family neighborhoods, providing an edge to the east and west transition zones. Primary East-West Streets East-west streets through the Greater Southdale District connect existing single family neighborhoods to the heart of the district. The design of these streets is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and consistently-scaled buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience serves as a bridge, knitting together the single family residential neighborhoods and the greater intensity of the district. Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6 Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 18 STREET ROOM TYPOLOGIES A hierarchy of streets and pathways within the district is the framework for public realm development and related building form. Each street across the district has a role in how it serves pedestrians, bicycles and vehicles in connecting sub-districts, adjacent single family neighborhoods, and the overall Greater Southdale District and creating a unified sense of place. It is the intent that street typologies define the public realm experience: the space between buildings, dimensions of building setbacks from the street, heights of facades at the building face at the street and building step backs, where the façade of the building steps back from the volume of the street room. Street Room Typology 1: Promenades and Transition Zones Promenades are new woonerf-type streets on the west side of France Avenue and on the east side of York Avenue. Within this typology, there are several different variations for new building development in these important transition zones, responding to and respecting the context of adjacent single family neighborhoods. Street Room Typology 2: Cornelia Overlay Zone With the understanding that there is special sensitivity related to new building development near the Cornelia neighborhood, this is a special zone governing the design of the public realm/street room on the east side of France Avenue between the north side of 69th Street and Gallagher Drive. Buildings within this zone will be expected to maintain the east side of the France Avenue street room, but will be of a lower overall scale than new Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6 Central Promenade Spine 66TH STREETVALLEY VIEW RD.66TH STREET69TH STREET70TH STREETHAZELTON RD.GALLAGHER DRPARKLAWN AVE76TH STREET77TH STREETMINNESOTA DR72ND STREETEDINBOROUGH WAY YORK AVENUE FRANCE AVENUE XERXES AVENUE BARRIE RD78TH STREETN Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 19 buildings at the north or south ends of France. Street Room Typology 3: New Local Streets These are new 60’ wide streets internal to existing superblocks. These streets will be constructed as new buildings are added to the district, and will help create the new network of streets and pedestrian pathways throughout the Greater Southdale District. Some of these spaces between buildings may become parks or plazas, extending the public realm. Others will become primary vehicular access for drop off and pick up, as well as access to parking and primary building services. Street Room Typology 4: Primary East-West Streets The existing 69th Street, 70th Street, Hazelton Road, Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street are important connections through the district from east to west. This typology is intended to respect the neighborhood scale and context in a meaningful way, with an ample tree canopy, extensive setbacks and lower scale buildings at the face of the public realm. By employing these characteristics, the landscape experience of the single family residential neighborhoods is extended through the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 5: The Boulevards France Avenue, York Avenue, West 66th Street and West 77th Street are the district’s gateway streets. They carry the highest traffic volumes and are intended to have higher transit volumes than any other streets within the district. These streets will have the greatest impact in conveying the overall identity of the district: a consistent 50 foot setback with a double row of trees will extend the length of these streets, while consistency in building heights along the street edge will form the edge of the street room—bridging between the lower intensity and transitional areas and the higher intensity zones within the Greater Southdale District. Street Room Typology 6: Central Spine The Central Spine comprises the existing Promenade, its potential expansion northward, and future connections to the west to Fred Richards Park. This important pedestrian network is an attractive destination for both residents and visitors alike. New development along the spine must respond to and respect this important public amenity. Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 20 The sub-district to the west side of France between 69th and Parklawn is a unique transition zone within the Greater Southdale District. Any proposed developments within this zone should be approached with special sensitivity. This means that the street experience within that zone should be perceived as connected to the Cornelia neighborhood through landscaping and trees, and buildings that gradually transition in both height and function and use between lower intensity neighborhoods to the more commercially-focused district on the east side of France Avenue. The West Promenade, a new north-south pedestrian, bike and vehicle street/woonerf that accommodates service access, is envisioned between France Avenue and the Cornelia neighborhood. This new shared street is intended to provide service access to new developments along France (keeping vehicular traffic out of single family neighborhoods), and providing a new framework to support the transition from townhouses and lower-scale residential buildings on the west side of the West Promenade, to slightly taller buildings on the east side of the West Promenade. Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood Transition Zones 1A West Promenade 1B West Promenade (South) 1C East Promenade 2 Cornelia Overlay 3 New Local Streets 4 Primary East-West Streets 5 Boulevards 6Central Promenade Spine NPARKLAWN AVE.76TH STREETMINNESOTA DR.GALLAGHER DR.72ND STREETHAZELTON RD.70TH STREET69TH STREET66TH STREET65TH STREETFRANCE AVE. YORK AVE. VALLEY VIEW RD. BARRIE RD. XERXES AVE. EDINBOROUGH WAY77TH STREET78TH STREET Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 21 Dimensional Characteristics of Street Room Typology 1A West Promenade / Transition to Cornelia Neighborhood As illustrated in the section above, within this transition zone, building heights will step up incrementally, from those that are adjacent to single family homes to those that are facing France Avenue to provide a more gradual transition from the residential neighborhood to the more commercially-oriented Southdale District. The street room experience within Typology 1A will be shaped by the following experience guidelines: • New buildings that are adjacent to single family residential properties, on the west side of the West Promenade, should not exceed 36 feet in height. Townhomes are the preferred residential typology in this area of the transition zone. • All ground level space east of the West Promenade should have 20-foot floor-to-floor height. This dimension allows for flexibility to accommodate one level of retail space along the street, or two-story townhomes facing the West Promenade. • All parking, other than short-term retail or guest parking, and building services need to be located below grade or hidden within the building. If on ground level or above, parking and/or building services must be surrounded on all sides by program space such as commercial or housing. • On the east side of the West Promenade, building faces should not exceed 50’ in height. Any height above that limit should step back 20 feet from the facade of the building. • On France Avenue, a 50 foot setback is required from curb to face of building with a maximum building height of 60 feet. • On individual developments, should the City choose to permit height above the 60-foot height limit, it is recommended that additional height above 60 feet step back from the face of the building by a minimum of 10 feet in depth and 12 feet in height. Street Typologies West Promenade Transition to the Cornelia Neighborhood A “Woonerf” reallocates the public right-of-way to create a place for people and plantings while accommodating slow-moving vehicles. The street is elevated so it is flush with the sidewalk, allowing for a continuous walking surface. When the street is closed for public events such as a fes tival, the area becomes a public plaza. The proposed building setbacks and building step-backs are intended to create a gradual transition in use and scale from the existing Cornelia Neighborhood on the west to France Avenue to the east. Between a transitional Street “Woonerf” is used as both a collector for neighborhood needs and a barrier against additional vehicular traffic flowing into the neighborhood. This street-park hybrid is considered as public open space and needs to be programmed. With a perpetual festival permit in place, the street becomes a venue for community events such as salsa dancing, a wine crush or a pop-up playground. Within the district it is the intention to define a series of street rooms each having their own characteristics and connections to the existing neighborhoods and other parts of the district to enhance the experience of the pedestrian creating both a sense of place and safe environment to be in. The West Promenade is intended to be a pedestrian and bicycle collector between the existing residential neighborhood. A1 Traffic Lanes 50 Foot Setback France Avenue 50 Feet West Promenade “Woonerf” (60’ wide Street) Single Family ResidenceTownhouses 36 Feet maximum 20 Foot Step Back Mixed Use Buildings 60 Feet Maximum Neighborhood Street 15 Foot Front Yard Setback60 Feet Maximum Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 36 5 Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember Greater Southdale District | Design Experience Guidelines March 5, 2019 page 37 1. Every new development begins with the 200’ x 200’ block, or some variation based on context. 2. Every block or building in a development will need streets to connect between buildings. Not all of these streets will need to accommodate vehicles, providing the opportunity for parks, plazas or courtyards—important parts of the public realm. 3. Buildings will not be greater than 200 feet in length, thereby minimizing the negative impact continuous walls can have on a comfortable pedestrian experience. 4. All streets are not equal. The plan outlines a hierarchy that is driven by the kind of experiences that are expected on these streets and how they facilitate an enlivened public realm. 5. Designated transition zones are about maintaining the quality of life in these areas without restricting growth in other parts of the district. 6. Promenades and East-West Streets are the bridge between single family neighborhoods, such as the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina and the west side of Richfield, to more intense parts of the district. 7. Street Rooms will intersect and overlap each other in many circumstances. At these intersections, lower building heights should prevail, giving the smaller scaled building precedence over larger scale buildings. 8. Building footprints above 60 feet in height are limited to 12,000 SF for residential uses, and 24,000 SF for commercial. 9. Within the first 60 vertical feet of a building, primary materials systems that are more traditional like brick, stone, glass wall systems are preferred. Above 60 feet, other materials such as metal wall systems within a larger curtainwall system, can be introduced. These baseline parameters should not be a deterrent to architectural innovation but rather are intended to serve as a measure of quality and continuity throughout the district 10. Transparency at the ground level facing the public realm is key to the individual experience and is a catalyst for how to activate and maintain a community-based approach to daily life and experience. 5. Implementing and Measuring the Guidance Ten Things to Remember Small Area Plan for the City of Edina’s 70th/Cahill Neighborhood Node Page Greater Southdale District Plan Greater Southdale District Plan – Adopted December 18, 2018 Page 94 Figure 4.16: Greater Southdale District Future Land Use Greater Southdale District Plan – Adopted December 18, 2018 Page 95 Development Transition Zones The language of this plan’s aspirations and policies focuses on transitions and seams – places where differences in scale, intensity, character, and use meet one another. These are critical places in the overall district, because they provide an opportunity to bind smaller subareas together into a large framework, while still allowing the areas to maintain their unique features and integrity. While transitions and seams will occur throughout the district, the Design Experience Guidelines specifically calls out transition zones between the Greater Southdale District (GSD) and adjacent residential neighborhoods. Figure 4.17 shows the location of these areas, which are defined as parcels around the edge of the GSD that are adjacent to residential neighborhoods - except in cases where they are separated by a major roadway or other nonresidential uses. The treatment of parcels within these areas will vary depending on specific size and placement of the parcels, and the character and scale of adjacent residents. For example, it is expected that this will vary by whether adjacent residential is single family or multifamily. Additionally, the space over which the transition occurs will vary, based on the depth of parcels and scale of the development. The transition may be contained within one building, or be managed across several. The Design Experience Guidelines have examples of both, as well as more specific information on appropriate building height and scale by corridor and sub-district. Greater Southdale District Plan – Adopted December 18, 2018 Page 96 Figure 4.17: Proposed Transition Zones Greater Southdale District Plan – Adopted December 18, 2018 Page 104 Figure 4.18: Current Roadway Network Greater Southdale District Plan – Adopted December 18, 2018 Page 116 Figure 4.22: Existing and Proposed Parks and Pedestrian Connections File #227702625 May 6, 2021 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4040 W. 70th Street in Edina, MN May 2021 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ........................................... 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-4 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM LOS RESULTS ...................................................... 5-5 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: May 6, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 May 2021 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4040 W. 70th Street in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northeast quadrant of the W. 70th Street/Valley View Road intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking lot. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • France Avenue/W. 69th Street • France Avenue/W. 70th Street • Valley View Road/W. 69th Street • Valley View Road/W. 70th Street • Cornelia Drive/W. 70th Street • Valley View Road/development access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new senior apartment building with 118 dwelling units. The project includes 86 underground parking stalls and 23 surface stalls. As shown in the site plan, three access points are provided on Valley View Road. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to remove 11 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, remove 4 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and add 144 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office building. • The proposed project results in a net reduction in trips on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected in 2019 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in r easonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include upgrading existing sidewalk on 69 th Street east of France Avenue and on France Avenue north of 69th Street to a shared use path. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on France Avenue south of 69th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. May 2021 1-2 • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. May 2021 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4040 W. 70th Street in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northeast quadrant of the W. 70th Street/Valley View Road intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking lot. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • France Avenue/W. 69th Street • France Avenue/W. 70th Street • Valley View Road/W. 69th Street • Valley View Road/W. 70th Street • Cornelia Drive/W. 70th Street • Valley View Road/development access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing building and constructing a new senior apartment building with 118 dwelling units. The project includes 86 underground parking stalls and 23 surface stalls. As shown in the site plan, three access points are provided on Valley View Road. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. May 2021 2-2 May 2021 2-3 May 2021 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by an office building with 30,073 square feet of office space. The site is bounded by Valley View Road on the west, 70 th Street on the south, and commercial uses on the north and east. Near the site location, 70th Street is a three-lane roadway with a center left turn lane. Valley View Road is a two-lane roadway. To the east of the site, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes and signal control at major intersections. To the north of the site, 69th Street is a four-lane divided roadway. The posted speed limit on France Avenue is 40 miles per hour. The speed limit on 70th Street west of Valley View Road is 25 miles per hour. The speed limit on other streets in the study area is 30 miles per hour. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Valley View Road/W. 69th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with stops sign on the northbound and southbound approaches. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The north leg provides access for commercial uses on the north side of 69 th Street. France Avenue/W. 69th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one channelized right turn lane. Cornelia Drive/W. 70th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. Valley View Road/W. 70th Street This three-way intersection is controlled with a roundabout. All approaches provides one lane and yield control. France Avenue/W. 70th Street This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The May 2021 3-2 northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Existing turn movement data previously collected for other studies in the area was obtained from City staff for the following intersections: • France Avenue/W. 69th Street • France Avenue/W. 70th Street • Valley View Road/W. 69th Street Turn movement data for the following intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in March 2021: • Valley View Road/W. 70th Street • Cornelia Drive/W. 70th Street May 2021 3-3 May 2021 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2024. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2021 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2024 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 0.5 percent per year to determine 2024 No-Build volumes. The 0.5 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2024 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2024 No-Build volumes to determine 2024 Build volumes. Estimation of Existing Volumes Due to COVID-19 Impacts The impacts of COVID-19 have resulted in significant reductions in traffic volumes due to changes in work and travel habits. Traffic volume data collected for studies completed prior to the pandemic was used to adjust the existing counts, resulting in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. These volumes were used for the traffic forecasts presented in this report. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project and Existing Uses Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Senior Apartments 118 DU 8 16 24 17 14 31 437 Existing use to be removed Office 30,073 SF 30 5 35 6 29 35 293 Total net trips -22 +11 -11 +11 -15 -4 +144 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet May 2021 4-2 As shown, the project removes 11 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, removes 4 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and adds 144 net trips daily. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 25 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 25 percent to/from the south on France Avenue • 15 percent to/from the west on 70th Street • 15 percent to/from the west on 69th Street • 10 percent to/from the east on 70th Street • 10 percent to/from the east on 69th Street Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. May 2021 4-3 May 2021 4-4 May 2021 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, b ut with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay r anges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffi c flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. May 2021 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are shown in Figures 5 and 6 and are discussed below. Valley View Road/W. 69th Street (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. France Avenue/W. 69th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. Cornelia Drive/W. 70th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. Valley View Road/W. 70th Street (roundabout control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. France Avenue/W. 70th Street (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. Under 2024 No-Build and 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. Valley View Road/development access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. May 2021 5-3 During the p.m. peak hour under 2024 Build conditions, all movements at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impact The proposed project results in a net reduction in trips on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of 70th Street, 69th Street, and France Avenue. Sidewalk is provided on the east side of Valley View Road. Sidewalk is provided on the west side of Cornelia Drive. All intersections in the study have crosswalks across all or a portion of the approaches. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. Future plans for this area include upgrading existing sidewalk on 69th Street east of France Avenue and on France Avenue north of 69th Street to a shared use path. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on France Avenue south of 69th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The area near the project site is attractive for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. Retail uses along France Avenue are popular destinations for the surrounding neighborhoods. The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short- term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus routes 6, 538, and 578. Bus stops exist on 70th east of France Avenue, France Avenue at 72nd Street, and on York Avenue. Potential Travel Demand Management Measures The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes, light rail and bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. • Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. May 2021 5-4 May 2021 5-5 May 2021 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project includes 86 underground parking stalls and 23 surface stalls for a total of 109 stalls on site. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 72 spaces. The 109 spaces provided can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. Edina City code requires one parking stall per unit, which equates to 118 spaces. May 2021 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to remove 11 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, remove 4 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and add 144 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office building. • The proposed project results in a net reduction in trips on the surrounding roadway system during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected in 2019 for previous studies in this area was used whenever possible to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. However, some intersections included in the study did not have previous data and therefore new data was collected. This data was carefully reviewed and adjusted using data from nearby intersections to account for pandemic related traffic volume reductions. This process resulted in r easonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include upgrading existing sidewalk on 69 th Street east of France Avenue and on France Avenue north of 69th Street to a shared use path. Future plans for this area also include a buffered bike lane on France Avenue south of 69th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. May 2021 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-500\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 489 78 23 106 20 70 5 17 5 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 20 489 78 23 106 20 70 5 17 5 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 532 85 25 115 22 76 5 18 5 5 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 137 0 0 617 0 0 686 763 266 489 837 69 Stage 1 - - - - - - 576 576 - 176 176 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 110 187 - 313 661 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1445 - - 959 - - 334 333 732 462 301 980 Stage 1 - - - - - - 470 500 - 809 752 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 883 744 - 672 458 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1445 - - 959 - - 317 319 732 431 289 980 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 317 319 - 431 289 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 463 493 - 797 732 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 849 725 - 638 451 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1.4 17.9 13.5 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 317 566 1445 - - 959 - - 441 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.24 0.042 0.015 - - 0.026 - - 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 19.9 11.6 7.5 - - 8.9 - - 13.5 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 T:\3022 City of Edina\21-500\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 183 304 48 71 28 78 709 64 49 675 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 183 304 48 71 28 78 709 64 49 675 28 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 199 330 52 77 30 85 771 70 53 734 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 109 967 431 168 776 287 247 1730 537 168 1503 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.29 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2539 939 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 199 330 52 53 54 85 771 70 53 734 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1701 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.9 17.2 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.6 2.7 2.5 10.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.9 17.2 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.6 2.7 2.5 10.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.21 0.76 0.31 0.10 0.10 0.34 0.45 0.13 0.32 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 25.2 30.1 38.0 22.4 22.4 35.0 23.2 20.6 38.0 26.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.5 12.2 4.7 0.4 0.4 3.8 0.8 0.5 4.8 1.1 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.7 7.8 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.9 4.3 1.1 1.3 4.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 25.7 42.3 42.7 22.7 22.8 38.8 24.0 21.1 42.9 27.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 544 159 926 787 A Approach Delay, s/veh 36.2 29.3 25.1 28.3 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 35.0 13.0 29.0 17.0 31.0 10.0 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 30.5 8.5 24.5 12.5 26.5 5.5 27.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 12.6 4.5 19.2 5.9 12.7 2.7 4.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.4 0.0 1.2 0.1 4.3 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 99 167 153 48 91 52 73 731 83 110 861 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 99 167 153 48 91 52 73 731 83 110 861 55 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 108 182 166 52 99 57 79 795 90 120 936 60 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 321 275 233 244 228 193 103 2129 240 156 2391 153 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.49 0.49 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4656 524 1781 4904 314 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 108 182 166 52 99 57 79 580 305 120 649 347 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1776 1781 1702 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 6.3 6.9 1.7 3.4 2.3 3.0 7.7 7.7 4.5 8.3 8.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 6.3 6.9 1.7 3.4 2.3 3.0 7.7 7.7 4.5 8.3 8.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 321 275 233 244 228 193 103 1557 812 156 1659 884 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.66 0.71 0.21 0.43 0.30 0.77 0.37 0.38 0.77 0.39 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 389 585 496 304 531 450 298 1557 812 402 1659 884 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.9 27.7 27.9 24.7 28.0 27.5 31.9 12.2 12.2 30.7 11.2 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 2.7 4.0 0.4 1.3 0.8 11.5 0.7 1.3 7.7 0.7 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 2.9 2.7 0.7 1.5 0.9 1.6 2.8 3.0 2.2 2.9 3.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.5 30.4 31.9 25.1 29.3 28.3 43.4 12.9 13.5 38.4 11.8 12.5 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 456 208 964 1116 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.5 28.0 15.6 14.9 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 35.9 7.6 14.6 8.5 38.0 9.4 12.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 29.5 5.5 21.5 11.5 33.5 7.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 9.7 3.7 8.9 5.0 10.3 5.6 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 5.9 0.0 1.3 0.1 7.2 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.6 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 4.6 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 341 193 90 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 348 197 91 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 67 29 145 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 169 386 81 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 3.9 3.7 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 348 197 91 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1289 1340 1190 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.979 0.980 0.989 Flow Entry, veh/h 341 193 90 Cap Entry, veh/h 1262 1313 1177 V/C Ratio 0.270 0.147 0.076 Control Delay, s/veh 5.3 3.9 3.7 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2021 am.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 246 55 55 133 5 44 26 42 10 33 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 246 55 55 133 5 44 26 42 10 33 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 267 60 60 145 5 48 28 46 11 36 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 432 347 78 317 515 18 328 200 258 194 578 73 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1478 332 1781 1797 62 520 459 593 244 1329 167 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 0 327 60 0 150 122 0 0 52 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1859 1572 0 0 1740 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 8.3 1.2 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 8.3 1.2 0.0 3.1 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.03 0.39 0.38 0.21 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 432 0 425 317 0 532 785 0 0 845 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.77 0.19 0.00 0.28 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 621 0 714 414 0 734 785 0 0 845 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.3 0.0 17.6 13.5 0.0 13.7 8.5 0.0 0.0 8.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.4 0.0 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.3 0.0 20.6 13.8 0.0 14.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 331 210 122 52 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 13.9 8.9 8.3 Approach LOS C B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 7.3 16.1 26.0 4.8 18.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 5.5 19.5 21.5 5.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 3.2 10.3 2.8 2.1 5.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.7 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 496 79 23 108 20 71 5 17 5 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 20 496 79 23 108 20 71 5 17 5 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 539 86 25 117 22 77 5 18 5 5 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 139 0 0 625 0 0 694 772 270 494 847 70 Stage 1 - - - - - - 583 583 - 178 178 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 111 189 - 316 669 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - 952 - - 329 329 728 458 297 978 Stage 1 - - - - - - 465 497 - 806 751 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 882 743 - 670 454 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - 952 - - 312 316 728 427 285 978 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 312 316 - 427 285 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 490 - 794 731 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 848 724 - 636 447 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1.4 18.3 13.6 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 312 562 1442 - - 952 - - 436 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.247 0.043 0.015 - - 0.026 - - 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 20.3 11.7 7.5 - - 8.9 - - 13.6 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 14 186 309 49 72 28 79 726 65 50 693 28 Future Volume (veh/h) 14 186 309 49 72 28 79 726 65 50 693 28 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 15 202 336 53 78 30 86 789 71 54 753 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 109 967 431 168 779 285 247 1730 537 168 1503 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.29 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2548 932 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 15 202 336 53 53 55 86 789 71 54 753 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1703 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.7 3.9 17.6 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.9 2.8 2.5 11.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.7 3.9 17.6 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.9 2.8 2.5 11.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.21 0.78 0.32 0.10 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.13 0.32 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.0 25.3 30.2 38.0 22.4 22.4 35.1 23.3 20.6 38.1 26.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 0.5 13.0 4.8 0.4 0.4 3.8 0.9 0.5 5.0 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 1.7 8.1 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.9 4.4 1.1 1.3 4.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.6 25.8 43.2 42.9 22.7 22.8 38.9 24.1 21.1 43.0 27.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 553 161 946 807 A Approach Delay, s/veh 36.8 29.4 25.2 28.5 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 35.0 13.0 29.0 17.0 31.0 10.0 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 30.5 8.5 24.5 12.5 26.5 5.5 27.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 12.9 4.5 19.6 5.9 13.0 2.7 4.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.2 0.1 4.4 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 173 155 52 92 53 80 748 84 120 874 56 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 173 155 52 92 53 80 748 84 120 874 56 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 188 168 57 100 58 87 813 91 130 950 61 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 324 277 235 243 233 197 113 2100 234 168 2361 151 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4662 519 1781 4904 314 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 188 168 57 100 58 87 592 312 130 659 352 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1777 1781 1702 1814 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 6.6 7.0 1.9 3.4 2.3 3.3 8.1 8.1 5.0 8.7 8.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 6.6 7.0 1.9 3.4 2.3 3.3 8.1 8.1 5.0 8.7 8.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.17 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 324 277 235 243 233 197 113 1534 801 168 1639 873 V/C Ratio(X) 0.34 0.68 0.71 0.23 0.43 0.29 0.77 0.39 0.39 0.77 0.40 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 388 578 490 299 524 444 294 1534 801 397 1639 873 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.0 28.1 28.2 24.8 28.2 27.7 32.1 12.7 12.7 30.8 11.6 11.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 2.9 4.0 0.5 1.2 0.8 10.4 0.7 1.4 7.3 0.7 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 3.1 2.8 0.8 1.6 0.9 1.7 2.9 3.2 2.4 3.1 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.6 30.9 32.2 25.3 29.4 28.5 42.5 13.5 14.2 38.1 12.3 13.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 465 215 991 1141 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.9 28.1 16.2 15.5 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 35.8 7.8 14.8 8.9 38.0 9.5 13.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 29.5 5.5 21.5 11.5 33.5 7.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 10.1 3.9 9.0 5.3 10.7 5.6 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 6.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 7.2 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.1 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 4.7 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 349 199 91 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 356 203 92 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 68 29 150 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 174 395 82 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 4.0 3.7 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 356 203 92 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1287 1340 1184 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.979 0.981 0.989 Flow Entry, veh/h 349 199 91 Cap Entry, veh/h 1261 1314 1171 V/C Ratio 0.277 0.152 0.078 Control Delay, s/veh 5.3 4.0 3.7 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 253 56 56 137 5 45 26 43 10 33 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 253 56 56 137 5 45 26 43 10 33 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 275 61 61 149 5 49 28 47 11 36 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 435 355 79 316 524 18 327 196 257 193 574 72 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1482 329 1781 1799 60 522 453 595 244 1329 167 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 0 336 61 0 154 124 0 0 52 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1811 1781 0 1859 1570 0 0 1740 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 8.6 1.2 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 8.6 1.2 0.0 3.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.03 0.40 0.38 0.21 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 435 0 434 316 0 542 779 0 0 839 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.77 0.19 0.00 0.28 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 622 0 710 411 0 729 779 0 0 839 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.2 0.0 17.7 13.5 0.0 13.6 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.2 0.0 20.7 13.8 0.0 13.9 9.1 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 340 215 124 52 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.6 13.9 9.1 8.4 Approach LOS C B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 7.3 16.4 26.0 4.8 19.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 5.5 19.5 21.5 5.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.2 3.2 10.6 2.8 2.1 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.8 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 496 75 20 108 20 72 5 22 5 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 20 496 75 20 108 20 72 5 22 5 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 22 539 82 22 117 22 78 5 24 5 5 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 139 0 0 621 0 0 688 766 270 488 837 70 Stage 1 - - - - - - 583 583 - 172 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 105 183 - 316 665 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - 956 - - 333 331 728 463 301 978 Stage 1 - - - - - - 465 497 - 813 755 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 889 747 - 670 456 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1442 - - 956 - - 317 318 728 429 290 978 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 317 318 - 429 290 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 458 490 - 801 738 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 857 730 - 631 449 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.3 1.2 17.7 13.5 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 317 588 1442 - - 956 - - 441 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.247 0.05 0.015 - - 0.023 - - 0.037 HCM Control Delay (s) 20 11.4 7.5 - - 8.9 - - 13.5 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 0.2 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 17 188 309 48 72 28 79 726 65 50 690 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 17 188 309 48 72 28 79 726 65 50 690 25 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 18 204 336 52 78 30 86 789 71 54 750 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 109 967 431 168 779 285 247 1730 537 168 1503 Arrive On Green 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.31 0.31 0.14 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.29 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2548 932 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 18 204 336 52 53 55 86 789 71 54 750 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1703 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.9 4.0 17.6 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.9 2.8 2.5 10.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.9 4.0 17.6 2.5 1.9 2.1 3.9 10.9 2.8 2.5 10.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.21 0.78 0.31 0.10 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.13 0.32 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 109 967 431 168 543 520 247 1730 537 168 1503 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 40.1 25.3 30.2 38.0 22.4 22.4 35.1 23.3 20.6 38.1 26.3 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.5 13.0 4.7 0.4 0.4 3.8 0.9 0.5 5.0 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 1.7 8.1 1.3 0.8 0.9 1.9 4.4 1.1 1.3 4.5 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.3 25.8 43.2 42.7 22.7 22.8 38.9 24.1 21.1 43.0 27.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 558 160 946 804 A Approach Delay, s/veh 36.9 29.3 25.2 28.5 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 35.0 13.0 29.0 17.0 31.0 10.0 32.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 30.5 8.5 24.5 12.5 26.5 5.5 27.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.5 12.9 4.5 19.6 5.9 12.9 2.9 4.1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.2 0.1 4.4 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.2 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 100 174 158 52 91 53 74 748 84 120 874 52 Future Volume (veh/h) 100 174 158 52 91 53 74 748 84 120 874 52 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 109 189 172 57 99 58 80 813 91 130 950 57 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 328 282 239 246 238 202 104 2083 232 168 2380 143 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4662 519 1781 4926 295 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 109 189 172 57 99 58 80 592 312 130 656 351 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1777 1781 1702 1817 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.6 6.6 7.2 1.9 3.4 2.3 3.1 8.1 8.2 4.9 8.6 8.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.6 6.6 7.2 1.9 3.4 2.3 3.1 8.1 8.2 4.9 8.6 8.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.16 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 328 282 239 246 238 202 104 1521 794 168 1644 878 V/C Ratio(X) 0.33 0.67 0.72 0.23 0.42 0.29 0.77 0.39 0.39 0.77 0.40 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 393 580 491 302 526 446 295 1521 794 398 1644 878 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.8 27.8 28.0 24.5 27.9 27.4 32.2 12.8 12.9 30.7 11.5 11.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 2.7 4.0 0.5 1.2 0.8 11.3 0.8 1.5 7.3 0.7 1.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 3.0 2.9 0.8 1.5 0.9 1.6 2.9 3.3 2.4 3.0 3.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 24.4 30.5 32.1 25.0 29.0 28.2 43.5 13.6 14.3 38.0 12.2 12.8 LnGrp LOS C C C C C C D B B D B B Approach Vol, veh/h 470 214 984 1137 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.7 27.7 16.3 15.4 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.1 35.5 7.8 15.0 8.5 38.0 9.5 13.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 29.5 5.5 21.5 11.5 33.5 7.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.9 10.2 3.9 9.2 5.1 10.6 5.6 5.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 6.0 0.0 1.3 0.1 7.2 0.0 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 19.0 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 4.7 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 344 204 98 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 351 208 100 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 69 28 150 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 181 392 86 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.3 4.0 3.8 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 351 208 100 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1286 1341 1184 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.979 0.981 0.980 Flow Entry, veh/h 344 204 98 Cap Entry, veh/h 1259 1316 1160 V/C Ratio 0.273 0.155 0.084 Control Delay, s/veh 5.3 4.0 3.8 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 1 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 4 249 56 56 138 5 45 26 43 10 33 5 Future Volume (veh/h) 4 249 56 56 138 5 45 26 43 10 33 5 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 4 271 61 61 150 5 49 28 47 11 36 5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 432 351 79 317 521 17 328 196 258 193 576 72 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1478 333 1781 1800 60 522 453 595 244 1329 167 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 4 0 332 61 0 155 124 0 0 52 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1810 1781 0 1860 1570 0 0 1740 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.1 0.0 8.5 1.2 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.1 0.0 8.5 1.2 0.0 3.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.03 0.40 0.38 0.21 0.10 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 432 0 430 317 0 538 781 0 0 842 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.77 0.19 0.00 0.29 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 619 0 711 412 0 731 781 0 0 842 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.3 0.0 17.7 13.5 0.0 13.7 8.6 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.3 0.0 20.6 13.8 0.0 14.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B A A A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 336 216 124 52 Approach Delay, s/veh 20.6 13.9 9.0 8.3 Approach LOS C B A A Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.0 7.3 16.3 26.0 4.8 18.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 21.5 5.5 19.5 21.5 5.5 19.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.1 3.2 10.5 2.8 2.1 5.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.8 HCM 6th LOS B HCM 6th TWSC 15: Valley View Rd & access 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 am b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 8 74 5 3 84 Future Vol, veh/h 8 8 74 5 3 84 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 9 9 80 5 3 91 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 180 83 0 0 85 0 Stage 1 83 - - - - - Stage 2 97 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 810 976 - - 1512 - Stage 1 940 - - - - - Stage 2 927 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 808 976 - - 1512 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 808 - - - - - Stage 1 940 - - - - - Stage 2 925 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.2 0 0.3 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 884 1512 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.02 0.002 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.2 7.4 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 407 61 51 233 5 115 5 61 20 5 20 Future Vol, veh/h 5 407 61 51 233 5 115 5 61 20 5 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 442 66 55 253 5 125 5 66 22 5 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 258 0 0 508 0 0 691 820 221 600 884 129 Stage 1 - - - - - - 452 452 - 366 366 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 239 368 - 234 518 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1304 - - 1053 - - 331 308 783 385 283 897 Stage 1 - - - - - - 557 569 - 626 621 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 743 620 - 748 531 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1304 - - 1053 - - 305 291 783 333 267 897 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 305 291 - 333 267 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 555 567 - 623 589 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 681 588 - 675 529 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.5 19.7 14.1 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 305 694 1304 - - 1053 - - 445 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.41 0.103 0.004 - - 0.053 - - 0.11 HCM Control Delay (s) 24.8 10.8 7.8 - - 8.6 - - 14.1 HCM Lane LOS C B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.9 0.3 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 57 295 223 113 155 77 208 1349 216 80 714 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 57 295 223 113 155 77 208 1349 216 80 714 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 62 321 242 123 168 84 226 1466 235 87 776 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 172 711 317 228 539 257 366 1929 599 168 1362 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.21 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.27 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2333 1114 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 62 321 242 123 126 126 226 1466 235 87 776 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1670 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.9 7.1 13.0 5.8 5.3 5.6 10.4 22.6 9.7 4.2 11.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.9 7.1 13.0 5.8 5.3 5.6 10.4 22.6 9.7 4.2 11.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 172 711 317 228 411 386 366 1929 599 168 1362 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.45 0.76 0.54 0.31 0.33 0.62 0.76 0.39 0.52 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 172 711 317 228 411 386 366 1929 599 168 1362 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.0 31.7 34.0 36.8 28.6 28.8 32.5 24.4 20.5 38.8 28.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.8 2.1 15.9 8.9 1.9 2.2 7.6 2.9 1.9 10.9 1.7 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 3.2 6.3 3.1 2.4 2.5 5.2 9.2 3.8 2.3 4.9 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.8 33.7 49.9 45.7 30.6 31.0 40.1 27.3 22.4 49.7 30.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 625 375 1927 863 A Approach Delay, s/veh 41.0 35.7 28.2 32.2 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 38.5 16.0 22.5 23.0 28.5 13.2 25.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 11.5 18.0 18.5 24.0 8.7 20.8 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 24.6 7.8 15.0 12.4 13.8 4.9 7.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.8 0.1 0.9 0.3 3.8 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.0 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 289 341 184 127 167 150 236 1385 139 94 908 48 Future Volume (veh/h) 289 341 184 127 167 150 236 1385 139 94 908 48 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 314 371 200 138 182 163 257 1505 151 102 987 52 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 425 438 371 258 297 252 298 1885 189 130 1518 80 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.40 0.40 0.07 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4716 473 1781 4966 261 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 314 371 200 138 182 163 257 1086 570 102 676 363 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1785 1781 1702 1823 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.8 15.6 9.1 5.3 7.5 8.0 11.6 23.2 23.2 4.6 14.2 14.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.8 15.6 9.1 5.3 7.5 8.0 11.6 23.2 23.2 4.6 14.2 14.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 425 438 371 258 297 252 298 1361 714 130 1040 557 V/C Ratio(X) 0.74 0.85 0.54 0.53 0.61 0.65 0.86 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.65 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 425 550 467 258 410 347 369 1361 714 183 1040 557 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.1 30.2 27.7 26.9 32.3 32.5 33.5 21.8 21.9 37.6 24.8 24.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.6 9.8 1.2 2.1 2.0 2.8 15.8 5.0 9.1 13.3 3.2 5.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 5.5 8.0 3.5 2.3 3.5 3.2 6.2 9.6 10.9 2.5 6.0 6.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.7 40.0 28.9 29.0 34.4 35.3 49.3 26.8 31.0 50.9 28.0 30.7 LnGrp LOS C D C C C D D C C D C C Approach Vol, veh/h 885 483 1913 1141 Approach Delay, s/veh 33.8 33.2 31.1 30.9 Approach LOS C C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 37.5 10.7 23.8 18.3 29.7 16.9 17.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 33.0 6.2 24.3 17.1 24.4 12.4 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 25.2 7.3 17.6 13.6 16.2 13.8 10.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.8 0.0 1.7 0.3 4.2 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.8 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.1 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 657 464 110 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 670 473 112 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 47 44 380 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 445 673 137 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.2 6.1 5.0 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 670 473 112 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1315 1319 937 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.982 Flow Entry, veh/h 657 464 110 Cap Entry, veh/h 1289 1293 920 V/C Ratio 0.509 0.359 0.120 Control Delay, s/veh 8.2 6.1 5.0 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 2021 pm.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 574 26 17 351 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 574 26 17 351 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 624 28 18 382 21 32 14 14 14 23 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 379 687 31 213 693 38 354 155 124 205 316 141 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.39 0.39 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1776 80 1781 1756 97 733 448 359 348 915 410 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 11 0 652 18 0 403 60 0 0 49 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1853 1540 0 0 1674 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 18.2 0.3 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 18.2 0.3 0.0 9.2 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.05 0.53 0.23 0.29 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 379 0 718 213 0 731 632 0 0 662 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.03 0.00 0.91 0.08 0.00 0.55 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 519 0 762 340 0 761 632 0 0 662 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.6 0.0 15.9 12.8 0.0 12.8 12.2 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 9.3 0.1 0.0 3.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.6 0.0 30.1 12.9 0.0 13.6 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B B A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 663 421 60 49 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.8 13.6 12.5 12.3 Approach LOS C B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.4 5.7 25.7 23.4 5.3 26.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.9 5.1 22.5 18.9 5.1 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.2 2.3 20.2 3.0 2.2 11.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.5 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 413 62 52 237 5 117 5 62 20 5 20 Future Vol, veh/h 5 413 62 52 237 5 117 5 62 20 5 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 449 67 57 258 5 127 5 67 22 5 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 263 0 0 516 0 0 705 836 225 612 901 132 Stage 1 - - - - - - 459 459 - 375 375 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 246 377 - 237 526 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - 1046 - - 323 302 778 377 276 893 Stage 1 - - - - - - 551 565 - 618 615 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 736 614 - 745 527 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - 1046 - - 297 284 778 324 260 893 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 297 284 - 324 260 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 549 563 - 616 582 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 673 581 - 671 525 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.5 20.4 14.3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 297 689 1298 - - 1046 - - 435 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.428 0.106 0.004 - - 0.054 - - 0.112 HCM Control Delay (s) 25.9 10.8 7.8 - - 8.6 - - 14.3 HCM Lane LOS D B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 0.4 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 58 299 226 115 157 78 211 1384 219 81 740 15 Future Volume (veh/h) 58 299 226 115 157 78 211 1384 219 81 740 15 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 63 325 246 125 171 85 229 1504 238 88 804 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 174 711 317 228 537 255 406 1929 599 168 1248 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.24 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2337 1110 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 63 325 246 125 128 128 229 1504 238 88 804 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1670 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.0 7.2 13.2 5.9 5.4 5.7 10.3 23.4 9.9 4.2 12.7 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.0 7.2 13.2 5.9 5.4 5.7 10.3 23.4 9.9 4.2 12.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 711 317 228 409 384 406 1929 599 168 1248 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.46 0.78 0.55 0.31 0.33 0.56 0.78 0.40 0.52 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 174 711 317 228 409 384 406 1929 599 168 1248 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.0 31.7 34.1 36.8 28.8 28.9 30.8 24.7 20.5 38.8 30.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.7 2.1 16.9 9.2 2.0 2.3 5.6 3.2 2.0 11.2 2.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.6 3.3 6.5 3.1 2.5 2.5 4.9 9.6 3.9 2.3 5.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 33.8 50.9 46.0 30.8 31.2 36.4 27.9 22.5 50.0 33.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 634 381 1971 892 A Approach Delay, s/veh 41.4 35.9 28.2 34.7 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 38.5 16.0 22.5 25.0 26.5 13.3 25.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 11.5 18.0 20.5 22.0 8.8 20.7 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 25.4 7.9 15.2 12.3 14.7 5.0 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.1 0.8 0.4 3.1 0.0 1.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.6 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 293 352 187 138 170 152 255 1421 141 110 922 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 293 352 187 138 170 152 255 1421 141 110 922 49 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 318 383 203 150 185 165 277 1545 153 120 1002 53 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 405 445 377 235 312 264 317 1890 187 151 1523 80 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.40 0.40 0.08 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4723 467 1781 4965 262 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 318 383 203 150 185 165 277 1113 585 120 687 368 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1786 1781 1702 1823 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 16.6 9.5 5.5 7.7 8.2 12.8 24.7 24.7 5.6 14.8 14.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 16.6 9.5 5.5 7.7 8.2 12.8 24.7 24.7 5.6 14.8 14.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.14 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 405 445 377 235 312 264 317 1362 715 151 1044 559 V/C Ratio(X) 0.79 0.86 0.54 0.64 0.59 0.62 0.87 0.82 0.82 0.80 0.66 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 405 532 451 235 400 339 385 1362 715 179 1044 559 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.9 30.9 28.2 28.9 32.6 32.8 33.9 22.6 22.7 38.0 25.5 25.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.8 11.9 1.2 5.7 1.8 2.4 16.9 5.5 10.1 18.7 3.2 6.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.1 8.7 3.6 2.9 3.6 3.3 6.9 10.3 11.8 3.2 6.2 7.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 42.8 29.4 34.6 34.4 35.2 50.8 28.2 32.7 56.8 28.7 31.5 LnGrp LOS C D C C C D D C C E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 904 500 1975 1175 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.0 34.7 32.7 32.5 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 38.4 10.0 24.6 19.6 30.5 16.0 18.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 33.9 5.5 24.1 18.3 24.1 11.5 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 26.7 7.5 18.6 14.8 16.9 13.5 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.5 0.0 1.5 0.3 3.9 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.7 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 675 477 112 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 689 487 114 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 48 46 393 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 459 691 140 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.3 5.1 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 689 487 114 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1314 1317 924 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.982 Flow Entry, veh/h 675 477 112 Cap Entry, veh/h 1288 1290 908 V/C Ratio 0.524 0.370 0.123 Control Delay, s/veh 8.5 6.3 5.1 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm nb.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 589 26 17 362 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 589 26 17 362 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 640 28 18 393 21 32 14 14 14 23 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 376 696 30 207 703 38 351 153 123 203 313 140 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.39 0.39 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1779 78 1781 1759 94 733 448 359 348 915 410 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 11 0 668 18 0 414 60 0 0 49 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1853 1540 0 0 1674 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 18.9 0.3 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 18.9 0.3 0.0 9.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.05 0.53 0.23 0.29 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 376 0 727 207 0 740 627 0 0 656 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.03 0.00 0.92 0.09 0.00 0.56 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 515 0 756 333 0 755 627 0 0 656 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.6 0.0 16.0 12.9 0.0 12.8 12.4 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 10.0 0.1 0.0 3.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.6 0.0 31.9 13.1 0.0 13.7 12.7 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B B A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 679 432 60 49 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.6 13.7 12.7 12.5 Approach LOS C B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.4 5.7 26.1 23.4 5.3 26.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.9 5.1 22.5 18.9 5.1 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 2.3 20.9 3.0 2.2 11.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.6 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 9: Valley View Rd/access & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 413 64 53 237 5 115 5 57 20 5 20 Future Vol, veh/h 5 413 64 53 237 5 115 5 57 20 5 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 100 100 - - 100 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 449 70 58 258 5 125 5 62 22 5 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 263 0 0 519 0 0 707 838 225 614 906 132 Stage 1 - - - - - - 459 459 - 377 377 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 248 379 - 237 529 - Critical Hdwy 4.14 - - 4.14 - - 7.54 6.54 6.94 7.54 6.54 6.94 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.54 5.54 - 6.54 5.54 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.22 - - 2.22 - - 3.52 4.02 3.32 3.52 4.02 3.32 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - 1043 - - 322 301 778 376 275 893 Stage 1 - - - - - - 551 565 - 616 614 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 734 613 - 745 525 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1298 - - 1043 - - 295 283 778 326 259 893 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 295 283 - 326 259 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 549 563 - 614 580 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 670 579 - 676 523 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.6 20.6 14.3 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1NBLn2 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 295 682 1298 - - 1043 - - 437 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.424 0.099 0.004 - - 0.055 - - 0.112 HCM Control Delay (s) 25.9 10.9 7.8 - - 8.7 - - 14.3 HCM Lane LOS D B A - - A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2 0.3 0 - - 0.2 - - 0.4 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 6: France Ave & 69th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 55 297 226 115 157 78 211 1384 219 81 742 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 55 297 226 115 157 78 211 1384 219 81 742 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 60 323 246 125 171 85 229 1504 238 88 807 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 170 711 317 228 543 258 406 1929 599 168 1248 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.24 0.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 3554 1585 1781 2337 1110 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 60 323 246 125 128 128 229 1504 238 88 807 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1777 1585 1781 1777 1670 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.8 7.2 13.2 5.9 5.4 5.7 10.3 23.4 9.9 4.2 12.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.8 7.2 13.2 5.9 5.4 5.7 10.3 23.4 9.9 4.2 12.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 170 711 317 228 413 388 406 1929 599 168 1248 V/C Ratio(X) 0.35 0.45 0.78 0.55 0.31 0.33 0.56 0.78 0.40 0.52 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 170 711 317 228 413 388 406 1929 599 168 1248 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 38.1 31.7 34.1 36.8 28.6 28.7 30.8 24.7 20.5 38.8 30.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 5.6 2.1 16.9 9.2 2.0 2.3 5.6 3.2 2.0 11.2 2.6 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.5 3.2 6.5 3.1 2.5 2.5 4.9 9.6 3.9 2.3 5.4 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 33.8 50.9 46.0 30.5 31.0 36.4 27.9 22.5 50.0 33.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D C C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 629 381 1971 895 A Approach Delay, s/veh 41.4 35.8 28.2 34.8 Approach LOS D D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 38.5 16.0 22.5 25.0 26.5 13.1 25.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 34.0 11.5 18.0 20.5 22.0 8.6 20.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 25.4 7.9 15.2 12.3 14.8 4.8 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 6.4 0.1 0.8 0.4 3.1 0.0 1.2 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 32.6 HCM 6th LOS C Notes Unsignalized Delay for [SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 5: France Ave & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 293 349 184 138 171 152 258 1421 141 110 922 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 293 349 184 138 171 152 258 1421 141 110 922 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 318 379 200 150 186 165 280 1545 153 120 1002 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 408 437 370 248 323 274 319 1876 186 151 1499 82 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.17 0.17 0.18 0.40 0.40 0.08 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 4723 467 1781 4954 272 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 318 379 200 150 186 165 280 1113 585 120 688 369 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 1870 1585 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1786 1781 1702 1821 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.5 16.6 9.4 5.9 7.8 8.2 13.1 25.0 25.1 5.6 15.1 15.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 16.6 9.4 5.9 7.8 8.2 13.1 25.0 25.1 5.6 15.1 15.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.15 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 408 437 370 248 323 274 319 1352 709 151 1030 551 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.87 0.54 0.60 0.58 0.60 0.88 0.82 0.82 0.80 0.67 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 408 510 433 248 397 336 374 1352 709 177 1030 551 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.8 31.4 28.7 27.4 32.4 32.6 34.1 23.1 23.1 38.4 26.0 26.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.3 13.1 1.2 4.1 1.6 2.1 18.4 5.8 10.5 19.1 3.4 6.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 6.1 8.9 3.6 2.7 3.6 3.2 7.1 10.5 12.0 3.2 6.4 7.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.1 44.6 29.9 31.5 34.1 34.7 52.5 28.8 33.6 57.4 29.5 32.4 LnGrp LOS C D C C C C D C C E C C Approach Vol, veh/h 897 501 1978 1177 Approach Delay, s/veh 37.6 33.5 33.6 33.2 Approach LOS D C C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 38.4 10.8 24.4 19.8 30.3 16.0 19.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 33.9 6.3 23.3 17.9 24.5 11.5 18.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 27.1 7.9 18.6 15.1 17.1 13.5 10.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 0.0 1.3 0.2 3.9 0.0 1.0 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 34.3 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th Roundabout 11: 70th Street & Valley View Rd 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.4 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 677 484 117 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 691 494 119 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 53 49 391 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 457 695 152 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 8.6 6.4 5.2 Approach LOS A A A Lane Left Left Left Designated Moves LT TR LR Assumed Moves LT TR LR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flow, veh/h 691 494 119 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1307 1313 926 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.983 Flow Entry, veh/h 677 484 117 Cap Entry, veh/h 1282 1287 911 V/C Ratio 0.529 0.376 0.128 Control Delay, s/veh 8.6 6.4 5.2 LOS A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 0 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 12: Cornelia Dr & 70th Street 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (veh/h) 10 591 26 17 360 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Future Volume (veh/h) 10 591 26 17 360 19 29 13 13 13 21 11 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 11 642 28 18 391 21 32 14 14 14 23 12 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 378 698 30 207 703 38 350 153 123 203 313 140 Arrive On Green 0.01 0.39 0.39 0.02 0.40 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 1779 78 1781 1759 94 733 448 359 348 915 410 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 11 0 670 18 0 412 60 0 0 49 0 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1856 1781 0 1853 1540 0 0 1674 0 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 19.0 0.3 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 0.2 0.0 19.0 0.3 0.0 9.5 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.05 0.53 0.23 0.29 0.24 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 378 0 728 207 0 741 626 0 0 656 0 0 V/C Ratio(X) 0.03 0.00 0.92 0.09 0.00 0.56 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 517 0 755 332 0 754 626 0 0 656 0 0 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.6 0.0 16.0 12.9 0.0 12.8 12.4 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.1 0.0 10.0 0.1 0.0 3.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.6 0.0 32.2 13.1 0.0 13.7 12.7 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS B A C B A B B A A B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 681 430 60 49 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.8 13.6 12.7 12.5 Approach LOS C B B B Timer - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.4 5.7 26.2 23.4 5.3 26.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.9 5.1 22.5 18.9 5.1 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 2.3 21.0 3.0 2.2 11.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 1.9 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.7 HCM 6th LOS C HCM 6th TWSC 15: Valley View Rd & access 05/06/2021 C:\Data\1 project\3022\synchro\2024 pm b.syn Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 7 126 11 6 103 Future Vol, veh/h 7 7 126 11 6 103 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 8 8 137 12 7 112 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 269 143 0 0 149 0 Stage 1 143 - - - - - Stage 2 126 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 720 905 - - 1432 - Stage 1 884 - - - - - Stage 2 900 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 716 905 - - 1432 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 716 - - - - - Stage 1 884 - - - - - Stage 2 896 - - - - - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 9.6 0 0.4 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 799 1432 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.019 0.005 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 9.6 7.5 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0.1 0 - 2200 Zane Ave N | Minneapolis, MN 55422 www.archfieldoffice.com Hi Cary, Per your request, we have reviewed the Sketch Plan proposal for the proposed affordable senior housing development at 4040 West 70th Street. We are aware that Edina code states that affordable housing projects with 100% affordable units may have some development standards relaxed, but do have a few thoughts on this project and its adherence to the broader Greater Southdale District Plan and Design Experience Guidelines. It is extremely important for the Southdale District to have affordable housing for people of all ages. It is this diversity that makes places interesting to live in, where the street room becomes the primary conveyor for all kinds of experiences. The Design Experience Guidelines set the stage for this. A good neighborhood with good streets means that one never passes unseen a familiar face, or are never oblivious to any feature of either the landscape within the public realm, or the architecture of windows, balconies and cornices that make up the walls of the street room. In a practical sense it means that there are jobs, services and entertainment within a short walk of your residence. It also means connections to nature, parks, gardens, allays of trees, waterways and active outdoor places. Vibrant neighborhoods create advantages for healthier social lifestyles. The places we live, and their character, is an important part of an individual’s “sense of place.” This is found in the consistent approach to the street. In developing the Experience Guidelines, we imagined that by creating a more democratic approach to the public realm, all buildings that make up a street have a common approach in how they contribute to the overall character of the street. The Guidelines encourage architectural diversity to enliven the overall experience, with a common street wall to frame and define a street’s unique qualities. Taking a consistent approach to setbacks, amount of building face at the setback, and transparency at the street level all contribute to more “eyes on the street,” creating a more lively and safe experience. In doing so, we also enable the social environment to be perceived as equal–and thereby more inviting–for everyone. The proposed building has an appropriate scale and variation of architectural character that can fit well into the Southdale District. While the building is similar to other district buildings, both existing or proposed, its current site plan is more in keeping with many other suburban developments throughout the metro region. The site plan and perspective drawings show the building’s main entry deep into the site with a surface parking lot, and three drive lanes into and out of the parking as the main elements along the street. This approach is obviously in conflict with one of the main Experience Guidelines that asks that a minimum 75% of the building meet the setback. To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date January 6, 2021 2 The proposal is an approach taken on many suburban building plans, where the practice of putting the parking in the front of the building is common. As this is the first phase of the review process with the City of Edina Planning Commission and the City Council, there are still many opportunities to rethink the site plan without sacrificing unit number or the plan efficiency. We would strongly encourage that the development and design team look at opportunities to ‘flip’ the site plan to put the parking and drop-off canopy on the opposite side of the building. This change would create more units facing the street and fewer units facing the limited setback at the property line, adding to “eyes on the street”. As described in the renderings, the height of the building could be 3 stories facing the neighborhood directly to the west while the taller 4-story façade could face the roundabout and the commercial area to the southeast. The desired outcome is a unique building that shares commonality with future buildings facing the public realm, with more street trees and residential units facing the existing residential neighborhood as an integrated and connected part of the existing neighborhood. Thank you for the opportunity to provide thoughts on the above. Please let me know if you have further questions. Mic DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION MAY 18, 2021 Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-22, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-22, AT 4040 70th STREE WEST The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-505 Planned Unit Development District-22 (PUD-22) – 4040 70TH STREET WEST (a) Legal description: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1365 Hennepin County Minnesota. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on ___________ except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2021-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District Multifamily Residential (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-1 Zoning District (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD- 1 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – Valley View Front – 70th Street Side – North Rear – East 50 feet 40 feet 10 feet 10 feet Building Height 3-4 stories & 48 feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5 Density (Southdale District Plan) 75 units per acre (100% of the units affordable) Parking 109 spaces proposed (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD-3 Zoning District for the retail uses, and PRD, for the residential uses. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 118 units of senior affordable housing to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of _______, 2021, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2021. ________________________________ City Clerk Date: May 12, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.C . To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-12: s ign varianc es for monument sign height and s ize of allowable building s ignage at 7101 & 7201 Metro Boulevard Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the sign variances as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he applicant, D avid Little, H G A, is requesting sign variances for the height of freestanding signs adjacent to H W Y 100 at 7101 & 7201 Metro Boulevard and the size allowance for the allowable signs at 7201 Metro B oulevard. T he subject property is located on the west side of H W Y 100, south of 70th Street W and east of M etro B oulevard. T he applicant is asking for multiple sign variances. One variance is for the height of the proposed monument signs adjacent to H W Y 100, one on 7101 M etro B oulevard & 7201 M etro B oulevard. T he second variance is a variance from the allowable square footage of wall signs at 7201 Metro Boulevard. T he applicant is requesting that the three allowable wall signs be up to 150 square feet. T he signs are on the north, east and south elevations of the 7201 M etro B oulevard B uilding. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 5-6-21 Noon Staff Report Aerial Map Applicant Submittal Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 06 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments-7201 Metro Blvd Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: sign variances for monument height and size of allowable building signage at 7201 Metro Boulevard VISITORS 5 CONTRIBUTORS 3 RESPONSES 3 0 Registered 3 Unverified 0 Anonymous 0 Registered 3 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:WBaillie Email:whosfield@yahoo.com Responded At:May 04, 2021 06:51:29 am Last Seen:May 04, 2021 06:51:29 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Willliam Hosfield Q2.Address 7100 Metro Blvd. # 109 Q3.Comment I have no concerns about the proposed signage. Respondent No:2 Login:x Email:orot@aol.com Responded At:May 04, 2021 16:14:41 pm Last Seen:May 04, 2021 16:14:41 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James Swindal Q2.Address 7100 metro Blvd., #311 Q3.Comment Regarding the building sign variance, what is the sign for and what does it say? Also, why did I get a letter regrading this request and got nothing when a Distillery was to go in that same building. Respondent No:3 Login:Jill Harder Email:jilljharder@gmail.com Responded At:May 05, 2021 18:38:56 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 18:38:56 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jill Harder Q2.Address 7100 Metro Blvd Unit 214 Q3.Comment This large signage would be an eyesore in our neighborhood. No other businesses have such signage. The applicant, David Little, HGA, is requesting sign variances for the height of freestanding signs adjacent to HWY 100 at 7101 & 7201 Metro Boulevard and the size allowance for the allowable signs at 7201 Metro Boulevard. The subject property is located on the west side of HWY 100, south of 70th Street W and east of Metro Boulevard. The applicant is asking for multiple sign variances. One variance is for the height of the proposed monument signs adjacent to HWY 100, one on 7101 Metro Boulevard & 7201 Metro Boulevard. The second variance is a variance from the allowable square footage of wall signs at 7201 Metro Boulevard. The applicant is requesting that the three allowable wall signs be up to 150 square feet. The proposed wall signs are on the north, east and south elevations of the 7201 Metro Boulevard Building. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: An office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District, and guided Office Easterly: Highway 100 Southerly: Office buildings zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and Guided Office Westerly: Residential Complex zoned PRD-4, Planned Residence District and Guided Medium Density Residential and Office May 12, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-21-12, Sign variances for monument sign height and size of allowable building signage at 7101 & 7201 Metro Boulevard Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property, 7201 Metro Boulevard, is 5.37 acres and is the current site of an existing nine story office building. Planning Guide Plan designation: Office Zoning: POD-2, Planned Office District Compliance Table Signs located in the POD District For buildings more than four stories *Requires a variance Sign Standards- POD-2 Proposed Monument Signs (Adjacent to HWY100) Proposed Building Signs (7201 Metro Blvd) Number of Signs- Square footage – Height 1 wall sign per building per frontage and one freestanding sign per frontage 120 square feet total between the two signs, with no individual sign being greater than 80 square feet 8 feet 2 monument signs (adjacent to HWY 100 at 7101 & 7201 Metro Blvd) 53.73 square feet 20 feet* 3 building signs (1 per frontage) at 7201 Metro Blvd 150 square feet per sign* N/A STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, Staff believes the requested sign variances are justified. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances required that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. The subject property allows for signage that more fits the size and scale of the building and property on which it is located. The proposed monument signage that is 20 feet tall will be adjacent to HWY 100 to improve visibility. The applicant is proposing to meet the allowable height on monument signage adjacent to Metro Boulevard. The proposed building signage is shown on the north, east and south elevations of the existing nine story office building. The proposed size of the wall signage is reasonable given the size and scale of the building on which they are located. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The proposed signage fits the size and scale of the building on which it is located and has minimal impact on surrounding neighborhoods. The scale of the building is unique to the similarly zoned properties in the area. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? The proposed variances will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The location of the proposed signs will have limited impact to the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed signs will fit the size and scale of the building. The height of the proposed monument signs along HWY 100 will help with visibility. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variances to allow the height of the proposed monument signs adjacent to HWY 100 at 7101 Metro Boulevard & 7201 Metro Boulevard be up to 20 feet and to allow the building signage at 7201 Metro Boulevard be up to 150 square feet based on the following findings: 1. The criteria for the proposed sign variances are met. The proposed signage will have limited impact on surrounding neighborhoods and fits within the size and scale of the building. 2. The practical difficulty is the scale and size of the site. Smaller wall signs on the building and an eight-foot monument sign would be difficult to see due to the scale of the building and visibility from HWY 100. 3. The proposed signage will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Sign plans and elevations date stamped April 21, 2021. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, Henn epin County, Edin a, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 72 01 Metro Boulevard April 29, 2021 1 in = 175 f t / 2 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood The request for larger signange comes from the fact that several of the major building frontages are along Highway 100 and at higher speeds it is necessary to provide larger signage to account for ease of visibility at the higher speed of traffic. This variance would be in harmony because the alteration would affect only the frontages visible from highway 100 and wouldn't change the character of the neighborhood view. The speed of traffic along highway 100 acts as an extrodinary circumdstance give that the speed of traffic is moving at much higher speeds and in turn limits the visibility of signage if designed to meet the current code requirements. The neighborhood facing frontages will continue to comply with the current zoning codes therefore the only affected views will be those along highway 100 which already has signage elements such as billboards and wayfinding signage which already reflect the larger scale sign character. The requested variance is practical and resonable as it would aleviate issues of visibility from Highway 100. By bringing the height of the monument signage up to a visible elevations and increasing the size of the building signage, it would be more easily seen by travelers along the traffic corridor while not impeeding on the caracter of the surrounding neighborhood in which the property resides. The following description was provided in Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Commitment No. 745887 which has an effective date of August 4, 2019 at 7:00 A.M. Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Martens 1st Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract and Torrens property Note: The Torrens portion being more particularly described as follows: Par 1: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Martens 1st Addition, embraced within Outlot A, Metro Place. Par 2: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Martens 1st Addition, embraced within Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 116, Range 21, except that part thereof embraced within Outlot A, Metro Place. The registered portion of the property is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 787157 Parcel 2: Lot 1, Block 1, Metro Place, according to the recorded plat thereof, and situate in Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Being registered land as is evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 626512. Parcel Description: 1'-6"10'-0"EDGE OF PLINTH BELOW EDGE OF FROST FOOTING BELOW -SIZE & STRUCTURAL DETAILS BY SIGN VENDOR UPLIGHTING - COORDINATE WITH SIGNAGE VENDOR & DESIGN-BUILD MEP VENDOR NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR SHALL COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BY MINNESOTA LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. A6 5 A401 5 A401 10'-0" 7201 METRO BOULEVARD 6'-2"1'-10"5"8'-0"3'-2" 5" 5" 1'-4" 5" PIN-MOUNTED WHITE LOGO AND ADDRESS LETTERS. FINAL DESIGN TBD 6" TALL TENANT NAMES ON 6" TALL COUNTERSUNK PANELS, 8" O.C. VERTICAL SPACING. ALIGN VERTICALLY O.C. PIN-MOUNTED 1/2" WHITE LINE TENANT 5" PLINTH, CLAD IN BLACK PREFINISHED METAL 4 SIDES MONUMENT PANEL, CLAD IN PREFINISHED METAL ON 5 SIDES, COLOR TBD 1 1/2" TYP TENANT NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR SHALL COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BY MINNESOTA LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. A6 TENANTTENANT TENANTTENANT TENANTTENANT TENANTTENANT 5" 1701 METRO BOULEVARD PIN-MOUNTED WHITE LOGO AND ADDRESS LETTERS. FINAL DESIGN TBD 8" TALL TENANT NAMES ON 8" TALL COUNTERSUNK PANELS, 8" O.C. VERTICAL SPACING. ALIGN VERTICALLY O.C. PLINTH, CLAD IN BLACK PREFINISHED METAL 4 SIDES MONUMENT PANEL, CLAD IN PREFINISHED METAL ON 5 SIDES, COLOR TBD A6 20' - 0"7' - 4" 7' - 4" 11" 1"7' - 4" 11" 1" 11" 1" 1701 METRO BOULEVARD PIN-MOUNTED WHITE LOGO AND ADDRESS LETTERS. FINAL DESIGN TBD 8" TALL TENANT NAMES ON 8" TALL COUNTERSUNK PANELS, 8" O.C. VERTICAL SPACING. ALIGN VERTICALLY O.C. PLINTH, CLAD IN BLACK PREFINISHED METAL 4 SIDES MONUMENT PANEL, CLAD IN PREFINISHED METAL ON 5 SIDES, COLOR TBD A620' - 0"7' - 4" 7' - 4" 11" 1"7' - 4" 11" 1" 11" 1" 1'-6"7'-4"EDGE OF PLINTH BELOW EDGE OF FROST FOOTING BELOW -SIZE & STRUCTURAL DETAILS BY SIGN VENDOR UPLIGHTING - COORDINATE WITH SIGNAGE VENDOR & DESIGN-BUILD MEP VENDOR NOTE: DIMENSIONS ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR SHALL COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN WITH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. MONUMENT SIGN VENDOR TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING BY MINNESOTA LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. A6 2 A401 3 A401 8' - 4"TRUE HGA NO: DATE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HGA 420 N 5TH ST, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612.758.4000 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY CENTER REALTY PARTNERS COPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS March 27, 2020 4532-001-01 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 7201 METRO BLVD EDINA, MN 55439 3/22/2021 5:42:33 PMC:\Users\lastephenh\Documents\Revit Local Files\L20-7201 Metro Blvd_453200200_lastephenh.rvtA401 MONUMENT SIGN DETAIL AuthorDAVID BRUCE LITTLE EMERGENCY INFORMATION 14 BULLETIN #13 12/18/2020 3/4" = 1'-0"4 MONUMENT SIGN PLAN 3/4" = 1'-0"5 MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION (FRONT & BACK) 3/4" = 1'-0"3 MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION @ HWY 100 NORTH 20' 3/4" = 1'-0"2 MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION @ HWY 100 SOUTH 20' 3/4" = 1'-0"1 MONUMENT SIGN PLAN @ HWY 100 20' 5' - 0"30' - 0"SELF-ILLUMINATED SIGN 5'-0"30' - 0"SELF-ILLUMINATED SIGN 5' - 0"30' - 0"SELF-ILLUMINATED SIGN TRUE HGA NO: DATE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HGA 420 N 5TH ST, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612.758.4000 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY CENTER REALTY PARTNERS COPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS March 27, 2020 4532-001-01 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 7201 METRO BLVD EDINA, MN 55439 3/19/2021 5:52:14 PMC:\Users\lastephenh\Documents\Revit Local Files\L20-7201 Metro Blvd_453200200_lastephenh.rvtA402 BUILDING SIGNAGE ELEVATIONS AuthorDAVID BRUCE LITTLE EMERGENCY INFORMATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 EAST SIGNAGE ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"3 NORTH SIGNAGE ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH SIGNAGE ELEVATION 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING7151 METRO BLVD.14,973 SQ. FT. +/-2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING7101 METRO BLVD.18,840 SQ. FT. +/-48 48 48 18 5 9 15 64 66 1229 12 3 6 6 5 20 50 26 26 26 24 24 42 5 15 5 7 6 40 10 5 22 TRUCK PARKING OPTION #1 TRUCK PARKING OPTION #1 ST GM H GM DYHWV DYH ST DYH H DYH H WV HEDYH ST H H HDYH H H H H WV H H H H ST H 7201 Metro Blvd deliveryCustom7 2 0 1 M e t r o B l v d d e l i v e r y C us t om(c) 2020 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 7201 Metro Blvd delivery Custom ( c ) 2 0 2 0 T r a n s o f t S o l u t i o n s , I n c . A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . 7201 Metro Blvd delivery Custom (c) 2020 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.7201 Metro Blvd deliveryCustom(c) 2020 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. 7201 Metro Blvd delivery Custom ( c) 2020 Tr ansoft Sol ut ions, I nc. A l l ri ght s r eser ved.7201 Metro Blvd deliveryCustom7 2 0 1 M e t r o B l vd d e l i v e r y Cust om(c) 2020 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.7201 Metro Blvd deliveryCustom(c) 2020 Transoft Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved...EAST FACADE: 5'x30' building mounted signage NORTH FACADE: 5'x30' building mounted signage SOUTH FACADE: 5'x30' building mounted signage METRO BLVD. MONUMENT SIGN: 8' tall x 10' wide HWY.100 MONUMENT SIGN: 15' tall x 10' wide HWY.100 MONUMENT SIGN: 15' tall x 10' wide 1 A401 GC TO COORDINATE FINAL SIGN ORIENTATION AND LOCATION IN FIELD WITH OWNER 1 A401 GC TO COORDINATE FINAL SIGN ORIENTATION AND LOCATION IN FIELD WITH OWNER 4 A401 GC TO COORDINATE FINAL SIGN ORIENTATION AND LOCATION IN FIELD WITH OWNER HGA NO: DATE: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HGA 420 N 5TH ST, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612.758.4000 NO DESCRIPTION DATE CITY CENTER REALTY PARTNERS COPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.C ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEET CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTSCONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS March 27, 2020 4532-001-01 NAME: DATE: REGISTRATION NUMBER: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 7201 METRO BLVD EDINA, MN 55439 3/22/2021 2:09:55 PMC:\Users\lastephenh\Documents\Revit Local Files\L20-7201 Metro Blvd_453200200_lastephenh.rvtA403 SITE SIGNAGE PLAN AuthorDAVID BRUCE LITTLE EMERGENCY INFORMATION 1" = 40'-0"1 SITE SIGNAGE PLAN N89°59'18"E33.76L=228.38R =307.84 Δ=42°30'21"N68°44'54"W 381.85L =1 3 8 .9 5 R =115.78Δ =6 8 °4 5 '47"S0°00'53"W 580.86S89°52'33"W 533.55N9°22'06"W 5 7 8 . 7 1 N0°00'42"W 408.15 METRO BOULEVARD W. 72 N D S T .METRO BOULEVARDSTATE TR U N K H I G H W A Y 1 0 0 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 1 2 3 VICINITY MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY NOTES CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE B - 2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION TABLE "A" OPTIONAL ITEMS GENERAL NOTES CERTIFICATION 1 2 STATEMENT OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTSLEGEND 3 PARCEL 1 AND 2 COMMON LINE EASEMENT ENLARGEMENT ~ < 0 ~ 0 - m 0 N C ill n 0 " 0 ~ N 0 E I F ~ ill ~ 0 0 ~ ~ t "I 0 01 - ' I I 1 I I :,. I I - () ~I I () Cl I I (/J I I I I V V V V V V V V V V l V V V V V V V -V V ~ V V - V V V V - .18 ~ J.4 < ~ "' 0 ~ -0 0 ' ~ ITT ~ N / 0 < u / ~ w "' 0 ITT / ~ 0 0 / ~ ITT ~ N / " / RIM~B3B.24 ---INV=831.9 E /✓,,.--BOTTOM=830.1 ~ / / /// ---- I -SIGN / / / / / / / / / / / / RIM=833.18 -----INV=B20.4 NE ,,,,,,_...-INV=820.3 SW / / /// ;;;?====717 -_/_ / / / / / / ---- 0 I I I I I I I I I I -"-I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -'" "' '-J y N 20 40 ~ I I I SCALE IN FEET ~-->>--->>--->>----tlP'>'ti'<-->>----<r}-,--<<---<<---<<---<<---<<~-,u-!!!':t---<<-lff-~-<'i\''1----<<---<<---<<-++--- v \ v I / \\ '' \ v , __ RIM=840.85 / INV~B34.2 v 1 4 , * -:,,;= -7n-30 \ 30 30 <:= vm-d-<= b,CIP <== r-10:) ~ aa:i < < I aoo BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT "ti )> :::a 0 m r .... , N. LINE OF THE S. 10 RODS i OF GOV. LOT 1 ' c- C) -, -> _/ _______ _ llJ r-- ' () ( ; --;', -~ ---' (/) --I ' I> / CJ CJ ----I --~ () -7 V / / / • ~ ?3 / / J/// , ~ ~ '-- ----L'. -- "! '\ I , ' \ ' )- /I / I I I I ' "' " " / ' / //// 843.55 ____ .... FE I / / / / T. "!"r WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partne r. Exceptional outcomes . 1802 WOOODALE DRIVE WOODBURY, MN 55125 Ph: 651-395-5212 //' C C '" '" I C C '" '" \ I C C '" '" \ C C '" '" \ C C '" '" \ \ C '" C '" C '" C '" C '" C '" CLIENT NAME ' 11811 RIM=832,22 INV=827.9 S--., \ \ \ -----, - I I @ CITY CENTER REALTY PARTNERS PROJECT TITLE ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY OWN BY CHK'D LJL XXX PROJECT NO, 2753-0013 APP'D XXX SHEET DWG DATE SEE CERT SCALE 1" = 20' NO. 2 OF 2 IJDOOR / EXITNEW CURB TAPERNEW SINGLE SIGNNEW DOUBLE SIGNNEW ISOLATION JOINTNEW CONTROL JOINTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPLAN LEGEND(SEE SITE SURVEY FOR EXISTING FEATURES LEGEND)REMOVE TREE/SHRUBREMOVE CURBREMOVE UNDERGROUND UTILITYABANDON UTILITY IN-PLACEREMOVE PAVEMENT/WALKMILL PAVEMENTREMOVE BUILDINGSAWCUT LINETREE PROTECTIONUTILITY CONTACTS:SEWER & WATER: CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS 952-826-0376CENTERPOINT ENERGY 612-321-5363XCEL ENERGY 800-848-7558CENTURY LINK 877-366-8344EXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GASEXISTING TELEPHONE/FIBER OPTICNEW SANITARY SEWERNEW STORM SEWERNEW WATERMAINNEW SUB-DRAINSB-02EXISTING INDEX CONTOUREXISTING CONTOUREXISTING CONTOUR DISTURBEDPROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONEXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE ARROWDRAINAGE DIVIDENEW MANHOLENEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURENEW HYDRANTNEW GATE VALVESOIL BORINGNEW LIGHT FIXTURESSILT FENCEINLET PROTECTIONEROSION FIBER LOGEROSION CONTROL BLANKETLAYOUT & SURFACING1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO CURBS AND CURB&GUTTER ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.BACK OF CURB IS TYPICALLY 8-INCHES BEHIND THE FACE OF CURB.2. GUIDELINES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW CONCRETE SURFACING:a.MAXIMUM SPACING OF CONTROL JOINTS IN WALKS TO BE 8-FEET, BUT GENERALLY MATCH THE WALKWIDTH.b.MAXIMUM SPACING OF CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE TRAFFIC SLABS TO BE 12-FEET.c.ALIGN JOINTS WITH WALK CORNERS, HORIZONTAL DEFLECTIONS, BUILDING CORNERS, ETC. AND USENOMINALLY EQUAL PANEL SIZES.d.SEE 3/C900 FOR JOINTING DETAILS.e.PROVIDE 2% CROSS SLOPE UNLESS DESIGNATED OTHERWISE ON SITE PLANS.3. DRIVEWAY APRON, SIDEWALK AND CURB & GUTTER WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE CONSTRUCTED INACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OR STATE DOT STANDARDS.GRADING1.SEE SITE SURVEY SHEET(S) FOR BENCHMARKS.2.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZED NO MORE THAN 7 DAYSAFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS CEASED.3.SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TYPICALLY GIVEN AT FINISHED SURFACE. AT TOP OF CURB, ELEVATIONS ARENOTED WITH A "TC".4.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, FIELD-VERIFY EXISTING BUILDING FLOOR ELEVATION(S) TO CONFIRM MATCHWITH NEW FLOOR ELEVATION(S).5.COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITH OWNER'S GEOTECHNICAL TESTING AGENCY FOR EVALUATION,CORRECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PAVING AND CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER SUBGRADE SOILS.a.REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, FILL AND UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FROM THE PROPOSED PAVING AREAS.b.OVERSIZE EXCAVATION 1-FOOT LATERALLY FOR EACH FOOT OF EXCAVATION BELOW BOTTOM OFPAVEMENT ELEVATION.c.EXISTING EXCAVATED SOIL WITH MORE THAN 2% ORGANIC CONTENT OR DEBRIS CAN NOT BE USEDWITHIN THE PAVEMENT AREA AS FILL.d.REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL, FILL, AND ORGANIC MATERIALS WITHIN 2-FEET OF THE FINISHED PAVEMENTSURFACE.e.TEST ROLL SUBGRADE SOILS WITH A FULLY LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK, AND CORRECT ALLUNSTABLE AREAS. CORRECTION OPTIONS INCLUDE SUBCUTTING AND REPLACING WITH CRUSHEDAGGREGATE, CHEMICAL STABILIZATION AND/OR USE OF GEOTEXTILES.6.TESTING AGENCY MUST OBSERVE AND APPROVE ALL PAVEMENT SUBGRADE SOILS.UTILITIES1.ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION OR ABANDONMENT MUST COMPLY WITH UTILITY OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS.2.STORM SEWER CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.3.COORDINATE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SYSTEMS WITH UTILITY OWNER.4.ADJUST ALL CASTINGS AND VALVE BOXES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS TO FINAL ELEVATION 1/4" BELOWFINISHED SURFACE.9.PROVIDE SUBSOIL DRAINAGE PIPE AT LOCATION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10. ALL PIPE CONSTRUCTION IS SUBJECT TO VIDEO INSPECTION TO CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO SAGS INTHE PIPE PROFILE. PIPES MUST HAVE A CONTINUOUS STRAIGHT SLOPE BETWEEN MANHOLES. 11. MAINTAIN ACCURATE RECORDS OF ALL NEW UTILITY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING SURVEYED ELEVATIONSOF PIPE AND STRUCTURE INVERTS FOR AS-BUILT OR RECORD DOCUMENTS.936.00ABBREVIATIONSADAREA DRAINADAAMERICAN DISABILITY ACTAGGAGGREGATEALTAAMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATIONARCHARCHITECTURALASTM AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING & MATERIALSBITBITUMINOUSBMPBEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICEBOTBOTTOMCBCATCH BASINCOCLEAN OUTCONCCONCRETECSPCORRUGATE STEEL PIPECYCUBIC YARDDIADIAMETERDIP DUCTILE IRON PIPEDWGSDRAWINGSELECELECTRICALFESFLARED END SECTIONGVGATE VALVEHDPEHIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPEHWHIGH WATERHYDHYDRANTINVINVERTLFLINEAR FOOTMAXMAXIMUMMECHMECHANICALMHMANHOLEMINMINIMUMNTS NOT TO SCALEPEPOLYETHYLENE PIPEPSIPOUNDS/SQUARE INCHPVCPOLY VINYL CHLORIDERRADIUSRCPREINFORCED CONCRETE PIPESANSANITARYSEWSEWERSFSQUARE FOOTSTSTRUCTURESTMSTORMSTRUCTSTRUCTURALTATESTING AGENCYT/WTOP OF WALLTYPTYPICALUNOUNLESS NOTED OTHERWISEWATWATERGENERAL CIVIL NOTES:PREPARATION & RESTORATION1.EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS DEPICTED ON THE DRAWINGS ARE BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC & UTILITYSURVEY PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR MUST VISIT THE SITE TO VERIFY EXISTINGCONDITIONS.2.CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED PERMITS FROM CITY, STATE AND OTHERS REGULATORYAGENCIES.3.UTILIZE THE STATE ONE CALL SYSTEM @ 1-800-252-1166, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANYEXCAVATION. EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AT APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS BASED ONINFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES IN RESPONSE TO A LOCATE REQUEST MADE BY THESURVEYOR. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN.4.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, FIELD-VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF UTILITIES THAT MAY BE IMPACTEDOR DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. REPORT ANY CONFLICTS OR EXISTING DAMAGE TO THE OWNER AND A/EPRIOR TO ORDERING ANY MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTION.5.INSTALL ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF LANDDISTURBING ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE PERMIT(S).6.PROTECT EXISTING UTILITY PIPES AND APPURTENANCES FROM DAMAGE DUE TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY. PROVIDE TEMPORARY SUPPORT AND BRACING OF UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH UTILITYOWNER'S REQUIREMENTS AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.7.COORDINATE DISRUPTION OF UTILITY SERVICES WITH OWNER. LIMIT SERVICE DISRUPTION TO TIMESAPPROVED BY OWNER.8.PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES, INCLUDING THE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS FIELD MANUAL,LATEST EDITION, AT ALL TIMES THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DISRUPTS TRAFFIC ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS.9.COORDINATE DISRUPTION OF PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC WITH OWNER. OBTAIN ALL REQUIREDSTREET AND SIDEWALK CLOSURE PERMITS. CONTACT CITY OR ROAD AUTHORITY TO VERIFYREQUIREMENTS.10.CARE MUST BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PROTECT SURVEY MONUMENTS AND PROPERTY IRONS.11.PROTECT ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL.12.SAWCUT PAVEMENT THAT REMAINS AT REMOVAL LIMITS.13.REMOVE & REPLACE ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY.14.RESTORE OR REPAIR DAMAGED ROADS, WALKS, CURBS, UTILITIES, OR PLANT MATERIALS TO CONDITIONEQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONDITION AND AS REQUIRED BY OWNER.15.ALL WORK MUST COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF THE MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FORCONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS, LATEST EDITION.16.LEGALLY DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE MATERIALS, DEBRIS AND EXCESS EXCAVATED MATERIAL.17.MAINTAIN ACCURATE RECORDS OF ALL NEW UTILITY CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING SURVEYED ELEVATIONSOF PIPE AND STRUCTURE INVERTS FOR AS-BUILT OR RECORD DOCUMENTS.EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL1.COMPLY WITH ALL NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS.2.INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROLS AS INDICATED IN PLANS PRIOR TO START OF WORK.HAYBALES ARE NOT ALLOWED AS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES.3.ESTABLISH ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES PRIOR TO BEGINNING LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 112"-3" WASHED AGGREGATE IS RECOMMENDED FOR ROCK ENTRANCES, A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ISREQUIRED.4.REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENTS DEPOSITED ONTO PUBLIC AND/OR PRIVATE PAVEMENT AREASWITHIN 24 HOURS OF DEPOSITION. REMOVAL OF TRACKING MATERIALS SHALL BE COMPLETED AT THEEND OF EACH WORK DAY WHEN TRACKING OCCURS. SWEEPING MAY BE ORDERED AT ANY TIME IFCONDITIONS WARRANT. SWEEPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OFCONSTRUCTION AND IN SUCH A MANNER TO PREVENT DUST BEING BLOWN TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.5.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION IN ALL DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THEDISTURBED AREA. CATCH BASIN INSERTS ARE REQUIRED AT ALL LOCATIONS NOT WITHIN THEDISTURBED AREA WHICH RECEIVE RUNOFF (MNDOT TYPE C INLET PROTECTION). NOTE HAY BALES ANDSILT FENCE WRAPPED GRATES ARE NOT EFFECTIVE AND ARE NOT APPROVED FOR USE AS INLETPROTECTION DEVICES.6.LOCATE ALL SOIL AND DIRT PILES NOT LESS THAN 25 FEET FROM ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADWAY ORDRAINAGE CHANNEL. ALL STOCK PILES THAT REMAIN IN PLACE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE SHALL BESTABILIZED BY MULCHING, VEGETATIVE COVER, TARPING OR OTHER MEANS. TEMPORARY STOCK PILESLOCATED ON PAVED SURFACES MUST BE AT LEAST 2 FET OR MORE AWAY FROM THEDRAINAGE/GUTTER LINE AND SHALL BE COVERED, IF REMAINING MORE THAN 24 HOURS.7.MAINTAIN ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES IN PLACE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGEAREA HAS BEEN STABILIZED. INSPECT TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON AWEEKLY BASIS AND REPLACE DETERIORATED, DAMAGED OR ROTTED EROSION CONTROL DEVICESIMMEDIATELY.8.MAINTENANCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PERFORMED WHENEVER THEDEVICE IS 30% FULL, FAILURE TO MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MAY LEAD TO FURTHERENFORCEMENT ACTION. WEEKLY INSPECTIONS REQUIRED AND AFTER EACH 12" OR MORE RAIN EVENTWITHIN 24 HOURS.9.READY MIXED CONCRETE AND BATCH PLANT WASHOUTS PROHIBITED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OFWAY, DESIGNATE CONCRETE WASHOUT AND MIXING LOCATIONS IN THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS.UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY WASHOUT WATER DRAIN ONTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR INTOTHE PUBLIC STORM DRAIN.10.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTLY STABILIZE ALL DENUDED AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADEDWITHIN 7-14 DAYS (SLOPE DEPENDENT). USE SEEDING AND MULCHING, EROSION CONTROL MATTINGAND/OR SODDING WITH TEMPORARY STAKING IN GREEN SPACE AREAS. USE EARLY APPLICATION OFGRAVEL BASE FOR AREAS DESIGNATED FOR PAVED SURFACING.11.REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC, STRUCTURAL AND NON-BIODEGRADABLE EROSION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL AFTER THE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND PERMANENTVEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, MINIMUM VEGETATION COVER OF 70% REQUIRED, ALLTEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE HAS70% ESTABLISHED VEGETATIVE COVER AND ALL PAVED AREAS HAVE BEEN STABILIZED WITH THESELECTED PAVEMENT TYPE.12.FURNISH AND INSTALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPs AS NECESSARY TOPREVENT EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACES AND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSIONCONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL WORK AND/OR GROUND DISTURBINGACTIVITIES COMMENCE AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS BEENELIMINATED. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN-GRADIENTPERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UP-GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN.13.STORM SEWER INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES WITH THE APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTIONDEVICE FOR EACH SPECIFIC PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAY NEED TO BEREPLACED MULTIPLE TIMES IN THE SAME LOCATION OVER THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. ALL STORMSEWER INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES.HGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020CIVILNOTESANDLEGENDC001 W. 72ND ST.METRO BOULEVARDSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 1001EXISTING BUILDINGFE=834.83KEY NOTES:SILT FENCE SEEINLET PROTECTIONEROSION CONTROL BLANKETROCK CONSTRUCTION EXITSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSFIPECBCESCLSTORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES:1.AN MPCA GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOTREQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT.2.SEE SHEET C001 FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES.3.THE CONTRACTOR MUST USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP) AS NECESSARYTO ADDRESS CHANGES IN CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER, ORSEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT EFFECT THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACEWATERS AND COMPLY WITH REGULATORY AGENCY REQUIREMENTS.4.THE CONTRACTOR MUST PLAN AND IMPLEMENT SUITABLE CONSTRUCTION PHASING,VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, AND OTHER PRACTICES THAT MINIMIZE EROSION ANDCOMPLY WITH THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NINE MILECREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT.5.SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE USED TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT ENTERINGSURFACE WATERS OR ADJACENT PROPERTY. ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES AT ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE LAND DISTURBINGACTIVITIES BEGIN. ALL STORM INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED WITH SUITABLE BMPsDURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION IS ESTABLISHED.6.ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS MUST BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITHFUNCTIONAL BMPS.7.ALL CONSTRUCTION WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE INA PERMITTED DISPOSAL FACILITY.8.CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE PROJECT SITE. IFPERMANENT STABILIZATION CANNOT OCCUR WITHIN 14 DAYS OF COMPLETINGGRADING ACTIVITY (7 DAYS IF WITHIN 1 MILE OF AN IMPAIRED OR SPECIAL WATER),ESTABLISH TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER WITH OATS AND TYPE 3 MULCH.9.REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AFTER SITE HASBEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. AT LEAST 75% OF SITE MUST HAVE EMERGENTVEGETATION, SOD OR EROSION BLANKETS.SITE INFORMATIONOWNER:CREFIV-CCRP METRO BOULEVARD EDINA, LLC7900 XERXES AVE SBLOOMINGTON, MN 55431PROPERTY:7201 METRO BOULEVARDEDINA, MN AREA (ACRE) SITE / PARCELDISTURBED AREAIMPERVIOUS AREA BEFOREIMPERVIOUS AREA AFTERREDUCTION OF IMPERVIOUS AREA5.370.164.324.220.10SCALE IN FEET02040IPIPIPIPIPIPIPSCLSCLHGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020EROSIONANDSEDIMENTCONTROLPLANC100 MIN. LENGTH =MIN. LENGTH =10 FTMIN.10 FTMIN.NOTES FOR DETAILS 1 & 21.MINIMUM LENGTH IS 50 FEET OR A LENGTH SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 5TIRE ROTATIONS ON THE PROVIDED PAD. MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BECALCULATED USING THE LARGEST TIRE WHICH WILL BE USED IN TYPICALOPERATIONS.2.PROVIDE RADIUS OR WIDEN PAD SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT VEHICLE TIRES FROMTRACKING OFF OF PAD WHEN LEAVING SITE.3.IF RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS FLOWS TOWARD CONSTRUCTION EXIT,PREVENT RUNOFF FROM DRAINING DIRECTLY TO PUBLIC ROAD OVERCONSTRUCTION EXIT BY CROWNING THE EXIT OR SLOPING TO ONE SIDE. IFSURFACE GRADING IS INSUFFICIENT, PROVIDE OTHER MEANS OF INTERCEPTINGRUNOFF.4.IF RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION EXIT WILL DRAIN OFF OF PROJECT SITE,PROVIDE SEDIMENT TRAP WITH STABILIZED OVERFLOW.5.IF A TIRE WASH OFF IS REQUIRED THE CONSTRUCTION EXIT SHALL BE GRADED TODRAIN THE WASH WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP.6.MINIMUM LENGTH OF RUMBLE PAD IS 20 FEET, OR AS REQUIRED TO REMOVESEDIMENT FROM TIRES. IF SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS TRACKED FROM THE SITE,THE RUMBLE PAD SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR THE DESIGN MODIFIED TO PROVIDEADDITIONAL VIBRATION. WASH-OFF LENGTH SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TOEFFECTIVELY REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLE TIRES.7.MAINTENANCE OF CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL OCCUR WHEN THEEFFECTIVENESS OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL HAS BEEN REDUCED. MAINTENANCESHALL CONSIST OF REMOVING SEDIMENT AND CLEANING THE MATERIALS ORPLACING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL (SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCK) OVERSEDIMENT FILLED MATERIAL TO RESTORE EFFECTIVENESS.RUMBLE PADSLASH MULCH,CRUSHED ROCK,SHEET PAD,OR OTHER PERSPECIFICATION.SLASH MULCH,CRUSHED ROCK,SHEET PAD, OROTHER PERSPECIFICATION.TAPER EDGESAT 1:1TAPER EDGES AT 1:1GEOTEXTILE FABRICINPLACE GROUND6" MIN.CROSS SLOPE 3% OR FLATTER6'' MIN. DEPTH OF 1''TO 2'' CRUSHED ROCK ORSLASH MULCHRADIUS ASREQUIREDPUBLIC ROADRADIUS ASREQUIREDPUBLIC ROADTRAFFIC FLOWHIGH STRENGTH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC(TWO LAYERS SEWN TOGETHER TO FORM POCKETS)MIN. 2" DIA. HIGH TENSILE REINFORCED RIBSSEDIMENTTRAPSEDIMENTTRAP6'' MIN. DEPTH OF 1'' TO 2''CRUSHED ROCK ORSLASH MULCHCONSTRUCTION EXIT(SLASH MULCH, CRUSHED ROCK OR SHEET PAD)12ENTRANCE WIDTHAS REQUIRED24' MINIMUMENTRANCE WIDTHAS REQUIRED24' MINIMUM2 FOOT MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENTGEOTEXTILE 5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POSTAT 6 FT. MAX. SPACINGOPTIONAL METHODSILT FENCE-TYPE HI (HAND INSTALLED)SILT FENCE TYPE MS (MACHINE SLICED)SILT FENCE TYPE PA (PREASSEMBLED)PLASTIC ZIP TIES(50 LB. TENSILE)LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN.3GEOTEXTILE36" WIDE2'45 FT. MIN. LENGTH POSTAT 6 FT. MAX. SPACINGPLASTIC ZIP TIES(50 LB. TENSILE)LOCATED IN TOP 8 IN.GEOTEXTILE36" WIDETIRECOMPACTIONZONEMACHINE SLICE8" TO 12" DEPTH2 FOOT MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENT2'5 FT. MIN. LENGTH POSTAT 6 FT. MAX. SPACINGGEOTEXTILE36" WIDE18 INCH MINIMUMPOST EMBEDMENT5FOR SHEET FLOW WITH MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA = 1 ACRECOARSEFILTERAGGREGATEFABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH,BACKFILL WITH TAMPEDNATURAL SOILSEE OPTIONALMETHOD DETAILFOR SHEET FLOW WITH MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA = 1 ACREFABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH,BACKFILL WITH TAMPEDNATURAL SOILFOR SHEET FLOW WITH MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA = 0.25 ACRES1" x 2"x 24" LONG WOODEN STAKES.STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGHTHE BACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENTCONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THESTAKE POINTING UPSTREAM.TYPES: STRAW, WOOD FIBER, OR COIRTYPES: WOOD CHIP, COMPOST, OR ROCKABACKFILL AND COMPACT SOIL FROMTRENCH ON UP GRADIENT SIDE OFSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGPLACE SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG INSHALLOW TRENCH (1" TO 2" DEPTH)8" TO 10" EMBEDMENT DEPTH1" x 2"x 24" LONG WOODEN STAKES.STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN THROUGHTHE BACK HALF OF THE SEDIMENTCONTROL LOG AT AN ANGLE OF 45DEGREES WITH THE TOP OF THESTAKE POINTING UPSTREAM.8" TO 10" EMBEDMENT DEPTHPLACE STAKES AS NEEDED TO PREVENT MOVEMENT OF SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS ONSLOPES, OR AS NEEDED DUE TO OTHER FACTORS (STAKES ARE INCIDENTAL TO INSTALLATION).SPACE BETWEEN STAKES SHALL BE MAXIMUM 1 FOOT FOR DITCH CHECKS,AND 2 FEET FOR OTHER APPLICATIONSCATCH BASINOR MANHOLEFRONT, BACK, ANDBOTTOM TO BEMADE FROM SINGLEPIECE OF FABRICMINIMUM DOUBLESTITCHED SEAMS ALLAROUND SIDE PIECESAND ON FLAP POCKETS1.ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION TO BE MONAFILAMENT INBOTH DIRECTIONS2.FINISHED SIZE INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND AMINIMUM OF 10 INCHES AROUND PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCEAND REMOVAL3.DO NOT PLACE FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES,MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE.THE PLACED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHESBETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OFTHE OVERFLOW HOLES. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDECLEARANCE.4.FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2" x 4", OR USEA ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF FLAP POCKETSCAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOXPLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LB TENSILE)HOLDS GEOTEXTILE IN PLACEON ALL POSTS - MIN. 3 PER POST24GEOTEXTILE ANCHORAGEPLACE GEOTEXTILE UNDERAGG. MULCH 12" OUTENDS SECURELY CLOSED TOPREVENT LOSS OF OPENGRADED AGGREGATE FILL. SECURED WITH 50 PSI. ZIP TIE.1OVERFLOW HOLES(2" WIDE x 4" TALL HOLEHEAT CUT INTO ALLFOUR SIDE PANELS, 12"ABOVE BOTTOM OFBAG) 1/2 W36" GEOTEXTILEREINFORCED w/WIRE7BUTT JOINTSGEOTEXTILE SOCK 4 - 10 FEET LONG AND 4 - 6 INCH DIAMETER. SEAM TO BE JOINED BY TWOROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR PROVIDE A HEAT BONDED SEAM(OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED AGGREGATECONSISTING OF SOUND DURABLE PARTICLES OF COARSE AGGREGATE8INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PERPLAN DIMENSION LENGTH ANDWIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKETUSE REBAR OR STEEL RODON BOTH SIDES FORREMOVAL (AT INLETS WITHCAST CURB BOX REPLACEROD w/2"x4") EXTEND 10"BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ONBOTH SIDES, LENGTHVARIES, SECURE TO GRATEWITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIESNOTE:THE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER SHALL BE A METALOR PLASTIC/POLYETHYLENE RISER SIZED TO FIT INSIDETHE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE; HAVE PERFORATIONS TO ALLOWFOR WATER INFILTRATION; HAVE AN OVERFLOW OPENING,FLANGES AND A LID/COVER.9AGGREGATE MULCH3/8" - 2", w/MAXIMUM5% PASSING 3/8" SIEVE10USE WHERE INLET DRAINS AN AREA WITH SLOPES 1:3 OR LESSAGGREGATE MULCH3/8" - 2", w/MAXIMUM5% PASSING 3/8" SIEVE18 INCHMINIMUMPOSTEMBEDMENTINLET w/GRATEPLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LB TENSILE)HOLDS GEOTEXTILE IN PLACEON ALL POSTS - MIN. 3 PER POST36" GEOTEXTILEREINFORCED w/WIREAGGREGATE MULCH3/8" - 2", w/MAXIMUM5% PASSING 3/8" SIEVETYPE IV GEOTEXTILE ALONGBOTTOM OF FILTER BERMDITCHPROFILE2 FT.MIN.FILTER BERM-TYPE 1 (COMPOST), TYPE 2(SLASH MULCH), OR TYPE 4 (TOPSOIL)11COMPOST, SLASH MULCHOR TOPSOILFILTER BERM-TYPE 5 (ROCK)12DITCHPROFILE2 FT.MIN.CLASS II RIPRAPTYPE IV GEOTEXTILE ALONGBOTTOM OF FILTER BERMFILTER BERM-TYPE 3 (ROCK WEEPER)12TYPE IV GEOTEXTILE ALONGBOTTOM OF FILTER BERMDITCH PROFILE2 FT.MIN.COARSE FILTERAGGREGATE1:2 SLOPE (TYP.)CLASS I RIPRAPABABASURFACE FLOWSURFACE FLOWCOMPACTED SOILGEOTEXTILE FABRICCORRUGATED STEEL PANELSFLOWFLOW6"6"FLOWFLOW6"6"FLOWFLOWSTAPLES (TYP.)SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS6SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCKSHEET PADCONSTRUCTION EXIT (RUMBLE PAD TYPE)RUMBLE PADSEDIMENT CONTROL LOG45°FLOW45°FLOWSEDIMENT CONTROL LOGWD1/2 D24"FLANGESGROUND LINE12"INLET PROTECTION - ROCK FILTER BERM w/SILT FENCEINLET PROTECTION - ROCK LOG/COMPOST LOGINLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERTINLET PROTECTION - SEDIMENT CONTROL INLET HAT24"1:21:212"5' MIN. LENGTH POST2.5' MAXSPACING5' MIN. LENGTH POST4 FEET MIN.5 FEET MIN.FLOW8 FEET MIN.C101EROSIONCONTROLDETAILSHGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020 N68°44'54"W 381.85EXISTING BUILDINGFE=834.83NOTES :1.SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTESAND LEGEND.KEY NOTESPROTECT EXISTING FEATURESAWCUT PAVEMENTREMOVE BRICK PLANTERSALVAGE LIGHT POLE FORRELOCATION. SEE SHEET C400.12331222222224SCALE IN FEET010204METRO BLVDHGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020SITEDEMOLITIONPLANC200 W. 72ND ST.METRO BOULEVARDSTATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 1001EXISTING BUILDINGFE=834.83SCALE IN FEET02040331112NOTE:1.SEE SHEET C001 CIVIL NOTES AND LEGENDS2.SEE SHEET C301 FOR KEYNOTES3.SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONALSITE WORK INFORMATION663HGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020SITE PLANC300SEE ENLARGED PLAN C3017201 METRO BOULEVARDEXISTING PARCEL AREA = 5.37 ACRES2019 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 4.32 ACRES2020 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 4.22 ACRES 34.1333.9133.7434.8034.6934.6934.8034.8034.7934.24TC34.534.5634.8434.5634.534.534.6634.6634.7834.7834.034.1334.352%2%2%2%1.8%34.3034.301.8%2%1.8%2%1.2%1.8%34.633.934.0334.20TC34.48TC33.64TC34.692%34.46TC1%3.4%2%34.63TCNOTES :1.SEE SHEET C001 FOR CIVIL NOTES AND LEGEND2.SEE SHEET C300 SITE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL KEYNOTE LOCATIONS3.SEE LANDSCAPE SHEET L100 & L110 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.KEY NOTESB612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - SEE DETAIL 1/C900TAPER CURB - SEE DETAIL 2/C900FLUSH CURB - SEE DETAIL 4/C900CLEANOUT - SEE DETAIL 9/C9004" SUBSOIL DRAIN PIPE - SEE DETAIL 9/C9004" SUBSOIL PAVEMENT DRAIN PIPE - SEE DETAIL 10/C900LANDSCAPE FEATURE - SEE SHEET L1106" PVC STORM PIPE(NOT USED) NOT USED)RELOCATED LIGHT POLEELECTRICAL CHARGING STATION - ( SEE SHEET A201 FORADDITIONAL CHARGING STATIONS)1234567891011FEET50331123344557777777872231246566HGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020SITEGRADING PLANC301EXISTING BUILDINGFFE=834.83± 1313 1/2"3" MIN.6"8"12"7"6"6"6"SLOPE GUTTER 3/4" PER FOOT INDIRECTION OF FINISHED CONTOURS.SEE GRADING PLAN.NOTES:1. PROVIDE A CUSHION JOINT WHEREVER CURB ABUTS AVERTICAL CONCRETE SURFACE OR FIXED OBJECT2. PROVIDE A 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT AT RADII3. PROVIDE A TOOLED JOINT EVERY 10 FEET (TYPICAL)SEE SURFACING PLANFOR PAVEMENTTHICKNESS21/2"3B4' IN GRASS; VARIES w/ADJACENT WALK TOMAINTAIN MAX. 5% SLOPETOOLED JOINT, IFREQUIRED TO MATCHEXISTING WALKPROVIDE SAW-CUT JOINTUNLESS DESIGNATEDOTHERWISETHICKNESS PERSURFACING PLANSEE SURFACING PLAN(S) FOR LOCATION OF JOINT TYPES.AGGREGATEBASE MATERIALBUILDING WALLJOINT DETAILSISOLATION JOINT (IJ)1/4" RADIUSSEALANTFOAM SEALANT BACKERFULL CURB HT1/4 SLABTHICKNESS1/4"1/4"GUTTER GRADE1/4" RTAPERED CURB HEIGHT1/2" R1/2" R7"1'-8"7"6"6"SLOPE CURB 1/4" PER FOOT INDIRECTION OF FINISHED CONTOURS.SEE GRADING PLANSEE SURFACING PLANFOR PAVEMENTTHICKNESSAGGREGATEBASE MATERIALCONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (B612)13" RADIUS1/2" RADIUS1/2" RADIUSCONTROL JOINT (CJ)AFLUSH CURB43" MIN.LONG SWEEP ELBOWOR WYE AND BENDAREA DRAIN,SMITH MFG. CO. MODEL 2410w/ DUCTILE IRON GRATE ANDSEDIMENT BUCKET,OR APPROVED EQUALSILICONE CAULKRISER PIPE TO FITAREA DRAININCREASER AS NEEDEDINVERT ELEVATIONSHOWN ON PLANSIZE & SLOPE OF PIPESHOWN ON PLANAREA DRAIN (IN LANDSCAPE AREA)8GEOTEXTILE FILTER WRAPPED AROUNDFILTER AGGREGATE4" PAVEMENT SUBSOIL PERFORATED DRAINPIPE w/KNIT POLYMERIC FILAMENTGEOTEXTILE SOCKMAINTAIN DRAINPIPE A MINIMUM OF 12"BELOW THE BOTTOM OF AGGREGATE BASELAYER w/POSITIVE SLOPE TO OUTLET CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SAND (ASTM C33)12"HAUNCHBOTTOM 1/3OF PIPEAGGREGATE BASE PAVEMENT SUBSOIL DRAIN PIPE10FLOWUNDISTURBED EARTHTYPICAL BEDDINGAND BACKFILLBEDDINGBEDDINGDETAILCLEANOUT9SCREW PLUG WITH RECESSED1" SQUARE FEMALE INSERT.PROVIDE MIN 2" CLEARANCEBETWEEN TOP OF PLUG ANDBOTTOM OF CASTINGCLEANOUT CASTINGNEENAH R-1975-A ORAPPROVED EQUAL2" CONCRETE SUPPORTPADIN PAVEMENT AREAIN PERVIOUS AREASEE SPEC SECTION 333500FOR CLEANOUT COVER.SET COVER FLUSH WITHPROPOSED GRADE.57MINIMUM THICKNESS OF LIFTS,COMPACTION VALUES ANDFREQUENCY OF TESTS AREDESIGNATED IN SPEC SECTION 312333PLANTING TOPSOIL IN PLANTINGAREAS U.N.O. DEPTH 12" (MIN)24"(MAX)SEED/SOD PER SPEC 329200PLACE TOPSOIL MIN 4", MAX 12"IF TRENCHING GOES THROUGH EXISTINGSURFACE NOT INDICATED AS NEW,CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE SURFACE INACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS ANDMINIMUM MATERIAL THICKNESSES TO MATCHTHE EXISTING SURFACING SECTION(S)THICKNESS OF LIFTS, REQUIRED DENSITYAND FREQUENCY OF TESTS ARE DESCRIBEDIN SPECIFICATION SECTION 312333AREAS INDICATED ON THESURFACING DRAWING AS NEW,TO BE CONSTRUCTED PERSPECIFICATION SECTIONS(CONCRETE 321313)(BITUMINOUS 321216)12" MAX LIFT PRIORTO COMPACTIONINITIAL BACKFILLSLOPES PER CURRENTOSHA STANDARDSPRIMARYSUPPORTMATERIALSPEC 312333PIPE BEDDINGTRENCH UNDER PAVEMENT OR FLOOR SLABSELECT TRENCH BACKFILLPLANTING AREASTURF AREAS18" MAX LIFT PRIORTO COMPACTION.INITIALBACKFILLPIPE BEDDINGSLOPE PERCURRENT OSHASTANDARDSGENERAL TRENCH BACKFILLGENERAL TRENCH BACKFILLLOAD FACTOR 1.5COMPACTEDINITIAL BACKFILLBc/4 BUTNOT LESSTHEN 6"0.5 BcHAND SHAPED PIPEBEDDING MATERIAL(UNDISTURBED EARTH)CLASS BCLASS C-26" MIN 12"BcBc0.5 BcMIN6WWGENERAL NOTES:1.SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 3123332.FOR PRESSURE PIPE INSTALLATIONS USE CLASS C-2 BEDDING3.FOR GRAVITY PIPE INSTALLATIONS USE CLASS B BEDDING4.W=Bc + 8"(MIN), Bc+24" (MAX) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5.WHERE UNSTABLE SOFT OR LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS OCCUR ATTRENCH BOTTOM, SUBCUT TRENCH BOTTOM 18" AND REPLACE WITHSTABILIZATION AGGREGATE OVER TYPE 5 (STABILIZATION)GEOTEXTILE AS DIRECTED BY TESTING AGENCY OR ENGINEER.BEDDING METHODSLOAD FACTOR 1.95C900BEDDING METHOD5C900BEDDING METHOD11PERMEABLE PAVER SYSTEM SECTION3"± PERMEABLE PAVER6"BASE STONE (ASTM C33 NO. 57)4" CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SAND (ASTM C33)GEOGRID9" SUB-BASE STONE (ASTM C33 NO. 2 OR NO. 3)4" SUBSOIL DRAIN PIPE w/GEOTEXTILE SOCK (ASTM D6707-01)PERFORATED CORRUGATED PVC (ASTM F949) OR PERFORATEDHEAVY-DUTY TYPE S HDPE (ASTM F667) SEE SPECIFICATION 334116.TESTING AGENCY APPROVED SUBGRADE12PARKING LOT ISLAND PLANTED SOIL SECTION13" CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SAND (ASTM C33)15" PLANTING SOIL4" SUBSOIL DRAIN PIPE w/GEOTEXTILE SOCK (ASTM D6707-01)PERFORATED CORRUGATED PVC (ASTM F949) OR PERFORATEDHEAVY-DUTY TYPE S HDPE (ASTM F667) SEE SPECIFICATION 334116.TESTING AGENCY APPROVED SUBGRADE4" CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SANDUNDER SUBSOIL DRAIN PIPE3" ROCK MULCHASPHALT PAVEMENTC900SITEDETAILSHGA NO:DATE:NODESCRIPTIONDATECITY CENTERREALTY PARTNERSCOPYRIGHT HAMMEL, GREEN AND ABRAHAMSON, INC.ISSUANCE HISTORY - THIS SHEETCONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTSMARCH 27, 20204532-001-01NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:NAME:DATE:REGISTRATION NUMBER:7201 METRO BLVDEDINA, MN 55439KENNETH W. HORNS18235I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATIONOR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTAMARCH 27, 2020 .. ' IC¥ fPil? ----- *Signage shown is an example of the size and scale of proposed signage* Date: May 12, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.D. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : P reliminary P lat with Variances for 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the proposed S ubdivision and Variances subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff review memo. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S cott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes is proposing to subdivide the property at 5209 M innehaha B oulevard into two lots. T he existing home on the lot would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new parcels. Lot 1 would gain access off the alley and Lot 2 off Minnehaha Boulevard. T his lot was originally platted as two lots. T he applicant is proposing to restore the original plat. (S ee applicant narrative and plans attached.) AT TAC HME N T S: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 5-6-21 Noon Planning Commission Staff Report - May 12, 2021 Engineering Memo, May 4, 2021 Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans , grading, drainage and eros ion control plan and tree plan Preliminary Plat and Median Calculations Recent Subdivis ion Reques ts Site Location & Neighborhood Maps Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 06 May 2021 Public Hearing Comments-5209 Minnehaha Blvd Subdivision Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Subdivision with variances at 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Josh Howie Email:joshua.howie@sbcglobal.net Responded At:May 05, 2021 16:46:33 pm Last Seen:May 05, 2021 15:48:52 pm IP Address:40.87.67.199 Q1.First and Last Name Josh Howie Q2.Address 5241 Minnehaha Blvd Q3.Comment Edina Planning Commission Members: Thank you for considering our comments as you review the proposed subdivision of the existing lot at 5209 Minnehaha (“5209”). We live five houses down the street from 5209 at 5241 Minnehaha Boulevard. Great Neighborhood Homes (“GNH”) built our home, and we are very happy with the finished product. We are glad Scott and Margaret have purchased the lot at 5209 and believe they will build a very nice home that will fit the character of the other homes on Minnehaha. As you know, GNH has built several homes on Minnehaha and Halifax and their team has done a very nice job. Despite our general support for GNH purchasing the lot, we do not support the subdivision of the lot and the proposed lot width variance at 5209. There are several reasons for our opposition to the GNH proposal: Increased Traffic / Parking Congestion: Building two homes instead of one home will result in increased traffic and parking congestion on an already busy street. The renovation of Arden park has been a great success. The park is beautiful, and we have seen the number of people visiting the park increase exponentially over the past year. The increase in visitors has resulted in increased traffic and parking congestion on Minnehaha. Families with young children often drive to the park and park their vehicles along the curve in front of 5209. This creates a potentially dangerous situation as the curve effectively becomes a blind curve for traffic passing the park. The blind curve is particularly concerning given the number of small children entering and exiting vehicles along the curve. Adding two homes to 5209 will only increase both traffic and parking congestion relative to a single home being built on the lot. Excessive Tree Removal: Building two homes will result in significant tree removal from 5209. The existing lot is full of trees and fits very well with the character of the neighborhood and Arden Park. We recognize that tree removal will likely be required to build a single home, but the number of trees removed for a single home should be significantly fewer than for two homes. Poor Precedent: Providing GNH with a lot width variance sets a poor precedent that will likely result in the character of the neighborhood changing significantly over time. One of the attractive attributes of purchasing or building a home on Minnehaha is the larger lot sizes relative to adjacent streets and neighborhoods. If GHN is provided with a variance allowing them build two homes, other lot owners on Minnehaha would likely seek to sub-divide their properties when they sell their homes in order to maximize their profit at the expense of the character of the neighborhood. This dynamic would only further exacerbate the traffic and tree removal concerns outlined above. Lack of Neighborhood Support: We have discussed the proposed variance with most of our neighbors on Minnehaha and we have yet to find a single neighbor that is supportive of the GNH proposal. Thanks again for your consideration and for your service to the residents of Edina. Sincerely, Josh and Kim Howie 5241 Minnehaha Blvd May 12, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat with Variances for 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard Information / Background: Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes is proposing to subdivide the property at 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard into two lots. The existing home on the lot would be torn down, and two new homes built on the new parcels. Lot 1 would gain access off the alley and Lot 2 off Minnehaha Boulevard. This lot was originally platted as two lots. The applicant is proposing to restore the original plat. (See applicant narrative and plans attached.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; and 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots; and Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 10,846 square feet, median lot depth is 163 feet, and the median lot width is 70 feet. (See attached median calculations.) Note on the attached site location maps that the lots to the south and east are generally the same size as the proposed lots. They were part of the Subdivision of South Harriet Park 2nd Addition. (See original plat.) Surrounding Land Uses The lots on all sides of the subject properties are zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing site contains a single-family home. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-dwelling residential Zoning: R-1, Single-dwelling district Lot Dimensions Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 10,846 s.f. 75 feet 163.5 feet Lot 1 15,144 s.f. 60 feet* 250 feet Lot 2 13,024 s.f. 60 feet* 215 feet * Variance Required Setbacks The front setback that is demonstrated on the plat (44.2 feet) is an average of the lots on either side of the existing lot. The home to the north has a 26.5-foot front setback and the home to south has a 61.8-foot setback. Given the curve of Minnehaha Boulevard, these setbacks seem reasonable. Side and rear setbacks would also be met. Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (See the attached memo from the city engineer.) Drainage would generally flow to the east to the alley and west to the street, away from the adjacent properties to the north and south. (See attached grading and drainage plan.) There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring properties. Any disturbance to the roadway or alley caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new home. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Trees The applicant would be required to replace trees that are removed outside of the building pad and driveway areas. This would be reviewed at the time of building permit to ensure compliance. Concern was raised from residents across the alley about tree loss. The applicant has agreed to establish tree preservation easements along the alley to preserve the existing trees in those areas. (See attached Plans.) Screening of single-family homes from single-family homes is not required. STAFF REPORT Page 3 History of Subdivision Requests with Variances The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this general area. (See attached area map.) The following is the history in the past 15 years: History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. 14. In 2019, 4625 Lexington was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,306 square feet to 8,106 and 8,128 square feet. (Median area - 9,306 square feet, median lot depth - 135 feet, and the median lot width 68 feet) 15. In 2020, 5928 Ashcroft was denied a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,813 and 6,790 square feet. (Median area – 8,841 s.f., median lot depth – 135 and median width was 66 feet.) 16. In 2020, 5928 Abbott Avenue was approved for a two-lot subdivision with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, lot area variance from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet, and lot depth variances from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. (Median lot area - 6,745 square feet, median lot depth - 129.9 feet, and the median lot width - 50 feet.) The City has approved and denied similar subdivisions. However, in the instances when subdivisions have been denied, the area immediately surrounding the site contained a wide variety of lot sizes. In instances when subdivisions have been approved, the requesting lots have been similar to lots in the immediate area. The proposed new lots are similar in size to other lots in this neighborhood. (See attached location maps.) Park Dedication Because this lot was originally platted as two lots; the proposal is to restore the original plat, no park dedication is required. (See applicant narrative for the original plat.) Primary Issue Are the findings for a variance met? • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met for this subdivision. Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? STAFF REPORT Page 5 Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is because previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot and built a home over the two lots. (See the attached original plat.) The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The lots to the south and east are the same size as proposed. The homes to the north, front on 52nd Street West and have their rear yard face the subject property. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. If the variances were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or similar to existing lots in the area. The applicant is proposing to restore the lots into the form of the original plat. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances regarding the size of the lot, and that a previous property owner built on and developed the site from two lots into one. That condition was not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Two new single-family homes would be constructed on lots similar in size to the lots to the west and south. The current lot is nearly double the size of other lots in this neighborhood. Options for Consideration As demonstrated on pages 3-4 of this report, there are options for consideration when considering a subdivision like this one. The following outlines options for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider. Denial Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed two lot subdivision of 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The Subject Property is a conforming single-family residential lot with a new single-family house and has a taxable market value of $962,900. Reasonable use of the property exists today. STAFF REPORT Page 6 2. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. The requested variances to split this lot are not reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. 3. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant’s proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. 4. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant’s desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The proposal re-establishes the original plat of two lots. 3. The practical difficulty is due to the fact that previous property owners did not develop on the lot that is proposed to be divided. The original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot and built a home over the two lots. 4. The existing lot is nearly double the size of lots in this neighborhood. 5. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The lots to the south and east are generally the same size as the proposed lots. The homes to the north face 52nd Street West, and have their rear yard face the subject property. 6. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the lots to the south and east. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. STAFF REPORT Page 7 c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated May 4, 2021. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. 3. All required structure setbacks shall be met. 4. Tree preservation easements be established as demonstrated on the site, grading erosion control and tree protection plan dated 4-9-21. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed two lot subdivision of 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet subject to the findings and conditions above. Deadline for a City Decision: August 4, 2021 DATE: 5/4/2021 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5209 Minnehaha Blvd - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a site plan, grading, and erosion control plan dated April 9, 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes a subdivision, which includes the demolition of the existing structure and new construction of two single dwelling units. Applicant requests a variance to the lot width. Easements Tree preservation easements are proposed on the two lots near the alley. Recording these easements would be a requirement of the permit close out if the variance is approved. Stormwater, Grading, and Drainage The existing site drains to Minnehaha Blvd, the alley, and private property. The site and grading plan indicates no new impervious will be directed to private property. Two-foot contours are required on the proposed stormwater management plan to confirm grading along the site lots. Rate control is required for any new impervious to private property and no new flow concentrations towards private structures must be created. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to relocate the existing driveway entrance. A driveway entrance permit will be required. A driveway entrance permit is not required for the entrance from the alley. However, it must comply with standard plate 400. The street was reconstructed in 2015. Refer to standard plate standard plates 525, 540, and 542 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from Minnehaha Blvd. A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the City watermain exits today and was installed in 2015. An additional one-inch service line is required per the City’s policy SP-024 from the watermain to the new lot and dwelling. The four-inch sanitary sewer service pipe was rehabilitated in 2015 with 4-inch PVC and connected to 4-inch cast iron service pipe. An additional sanitary sewer service line is required for the new lot. The connection location of the new sanitary sewer service shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to permit due to the recently completely Arden Park improvements. Sewer and water connection fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance for the new sewer and water connections. Met Council fees may also apply. Sump line available for connection. If connecting to the City sump line, a permit and compliance with City of Edina Building Policy SP-006 will be required. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required, applicant will need to verify with the district. A sealed well is located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. 2662 South Harriet Park, 2 ea Addition Sear.am0La! 5209 Minnehaha onginally platted as Iwo lots in 1922 Alf.* ..•••••,•• 1..." 11, .1••••••••••- • • ••••• • • At •••••J ••••••••• ••••./..,14••••• Irv•••4,es. •••••• ••••• • ••••••^0 ••• ••• • V Aa. ................... • ,e; a/ Atm...A • • • • --at . AA CA.A. 1.41 a • ....M...A •••e.. pr, ma. ...a.... a. Mier Man r.. r {Vs.* _..b !!i. • 7/. 1•11., ea. •Ve:7- • -•• e.— • •-• • t•-••''- • "•-• • •-••••!•-••,,M•ter, • - fft;; 1•11•1••••000 5209 Minnehaha Blvd Preliminary Plat Subdivision with Variance Narrative The mission of our company, Great Neighborhood Homes, has always been to design and build new homes for families that fit well into the character of the existing neighborhood. We have built two homes on Minnehaha Blvd (5241 and 5309), as well as many other homes in the Arden Park neighborhood on Halifax (5212, 5228, 5304), Arden (5002, 5005), Bruce (5021), Juanita (5105), 52' Street (4201) and Indianola (5101, 5124, 5128, 5129). Our office is nearby at 50th and France and we have lived in the neighborhood for 25 years. We purchased 5209 Minnehaha because we want to make sure that the development of the property is done in a way which respects the unique character of Arden Park. Here are two examples of home we have built in the neighborhood: CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5209 Minnehaha was originally platted as two lots (lots 39, 40) per the original 1922 plat. - I SZNO. sr r• 3 .1 J• 3 w. 1946 survey showing home built on north lot 40 4- Lot 39 left vacant SOO. PAW,. .01000v0. LOCATION OF /-1C:., SS:' 11.1 non,. 000 SOw-N HAR•C'Er A::,.-.' LCA /'=S0' .616418, 1006 1 The history of the lots shows the original homeowner building one home on the north lot (lot 40) in 1946. Here is the 1946 plat showing the original home on lot 40: The homeowner then did an addition that crossed the lot line into the south lot 39 in 1948 per this 1948 survey: • WALNUT 7635 H ticU cf, CITY OF EDINA 110 3 APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Pt ( t : fri a k t? I v of (A. 5209 MInneheha Blvd Edina, Minnesota Google 0 Street View CITY OF EDINA Here are photos of the existing home at 5209 Minnehaha: APR 0 9 2021 Current view from Arden Park PLANNING DEP/\ MENT Summer View: Property is very overgrown 5209 Minnehaha is in poor condition and has been vacant for some time. The neighborhood is anxious for something to happen on this property. It is true that we could build one large, more expensive home on the existing 120' lot. However, our intention is to subdivide the oversized property to the originally platted two lots and build two new homes. We feel two smaller homes would be a better fit in this section of the block. This will result in a more balanced streetscape on Minnehaha Blvd; with the new homes continuing the curving/sequentially staggered placement of the homes on the adjacent lots that exists today. It will provide a more blended and harmonious streetscape than one large home on a section of the block that is all smaller homes on 60' lots. Of the 13 other homes on Minnehaha Blvd, 7 of the 13 homes are all on 60' lots. 6 of these 60' lot homes are on the north section of the block where we are proposing the subdivision (the only lot of the first 7 that is not 60' is 5209 Minnehaha.) Here is a photo of the 4 homes to the south of 5209: Here is a photo of the 2 homes to the north of 5209: CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5200 5.204 5200. '201 i 4 .5200 5209 ~Y?.4 `1 21'21 .‘522-1. 5225 5229 IIIIa .52.J'' • 52,33 IL.*-5.j2732 :' 4 -41144014.w 4 li".- so. 5236 . --4 la ' 524 .i. it i ,..1s 4L?:1..,.) 2.: , 4 ri3b-,„ 5301 ,.- 5304:11r, .......-. ., _ . . j, 5300 J 530187,14;1 536 :i tlia-- I. li.A. Fiji takr.. ...gr. 11 .. , 53164 -1- . ...i...aa..1 5321 5320 ‘ ti . I 111.1 ,537214 532111111126 5332fa. b i.jo 541,1 I '5.301 i 5305 5309 On the adjacent 52/5300 block of Halifax avenue, 40 of 40 homes are on 60' lots. A total of 47 of 60 homes on these two blocks of Halifax and Minnehaha are on 60' lots. Here is an aerial view of these blocks: CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT In addition, two smaller lots will allow the new homes to fit in better by limiting the height of the new homes to 30', whereby city zoning would allow a home 40' high on the larger lot. We feel building two new homes in smaller lots will be a better fit for the neighborhood as well as create the opportunity to welcome more new families to Edina. We planned the subdivision to match up with original plat for two lots. Prior to submitting the application we held multiple neighborhood meetings as well as met individually with the 8 adjacent property owners. Here is the letter that went out to all neighbors within 500': I • 10 NI II el 61 I S I It I. hi 0 N I t,S I rK1uK 1)k February 2. 2 ,1 Ma Neighbors of 5209 Minnehaha Blvd: I am writing to inform you that we ha., c purchased 521i9 Nlinnehalut 111v, and ate planning to submit a subdivision application to the Cit.) hi sUIXIIS'idc: the existing 120' aide lot into two 60. wide lots. The subdivision \Sill he t.:onsideted by the Edina Planning ('ommission at an upcoming meeting ia notice of the meeting date and time will be mailed out to all property owners within 500 feet of the property 10 days prior to the meeting), 5209 Minnehaha Blvd was originally platted as two 60' wide lots. The goal oh' this subdivision is to return the properly to how it was originally intended as two smaller lots for two ISO% 1141111C3. We feel two smaller homes will better reflect the character of the neighborhood than would one very large home. The vast majority of homes on Nlinnehaba Blvd and Ilalifax Avenue are on similar sited 60' wide lots. Prior to submitting the application, we would like to share with you (Mr rlatIS for the subdiVls:,on and get your feedback at a Ilt:i141111(1C1100d meeting. DUO to the colder weather and current t't )VII) guidelines. we are providing the following opportunities to review the subdivision plans: . Saturday, February (t'' 11:09 am -- 1209 pm: Neighbor Meeting at 5209 Minnchaha Blvd ime..1. outside). 2. Saturday. February 1:00 pm -- 2:00 put: Neighbor Meeting at our office at 3939 West 5(Y Street Suite 103A (Lunds pkg lot 3 doors left of Starhucks). 3. 1 can meet you personally at the site at another time that works with your schedule. 4. I can email you the subdivision save). plans. As neighbors who have enjoyed living in this neighborhood and we feel it is a privilege to work in Arden Park. It is our goal to enhance the block by leaving behind well-designed homes that lit the character of homes in the neighborhood. We have built several homes nearby at 5241 Nlinnchaha. 5309 Minnehaha. 4201 52". 5220 Elalifax. 5228 Ilatillax. 5304 Halifax, 5101 Indianola. 5124 Indianola. 5128 Indianola, 5129 Indianola, 511)5 Juanita, 51)21 Brace. and 51)02 Arden. The homes at 520') Mimic:halm Blvd will be designed and built with the same level of attention to the character of the neighborhood. I ant available for questions or concerns anytime at 052.807.8765 or via email at 1 bank you. --;cott liusyn weal Neighborhood Homes (MAT NI IGHBoRimon Norms CITY OF EDINA APR 09 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT scorrlillSYN 14.'1 `Ihrh *,t I 1..111, "•t)SISI MAROA141111.1SYN 'f.: VAI) 40 744 -.0, 1:' VW/IW Coin I 1 cl gfilr 1,..1,,11,p71.111 a i•lit ipg; iprilmaga wow 4207 concerned about _ 4201 concerned losing view from her back swift about increased traffic on yard. alley and asked for help with draining his property to 5209 5205 Concerned about views of park and distance of new house from property 5204 concerned about loss of trees and driveway access from alley • ti 5208 concerned about losing views of trees and seeing garage from her office and master bedroom 71 *4 property. 111114"1.11 - T • L 47-417417111111". , _ MEM ..711 5212 concerned about views of existing trees from her 5217 asked about keeping existing fence for their dogs 4 r 5205 We had good attendance at the meetings and developed the following feedback map to gather neighborhood concerns: Based on this feedback, the new proposed plat was designed to maintain the existing neighborhood character by using the following principles: 1) Balance driveway access between the alley and Minnehaha Blvd. There was concern about increased traffic on alley as we had originally proposed two driveways on alley. 2) Maintain existing forest views of neighbors at 5205 Minnehaha, 4201 52nd, 5204, 5208, 5212 Halifax and 5217 Minnehaha. 5208 Halifax neighbor was concerned about losing her view of the existing trees behind her property and seeing a new garage on the proposed north lot from her office and master bedroom: CITY OF EDINA APR 09 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3) Minimize impact to existing overstory trees as much as possible. 4) Maintain long park/creek views of neighbor at 4207 52"d Street, 5205, 5207 Minnehaha. Here is the current view of the park from the back yard at 4207 52"d: CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5) Improve drainage from site and away from neighbors. The proposed plat reflects these principles: 1) Position proposed north lot driveway to the far southerly portion of the lot so homeowner at 5208 Halifax will not look directly into a new garage. This location for the driveway is in an existing gap that does not have any large trees to be removed. 2) Create a permanent tree preservation easement on the rear sections of each lot to maintain the forested view of neighbors on Halifax and 4201 52nd Street. The plat allows proposes 4 new trees to fill in the gap in the forested alley view where trees do not exist today. 3) Position proposed south lot driveway to access off Minnehaha. This location for the driveway avoids having to remove any of the large trees in this area. 4) Limit the front street setback of the new homes to the existing front setback of the current home. The average front setback would allow a new home on the north lot to be built quite a bit closer to the street and would block the views of the park and creek for neighbors at 4207 52"d, 5201/5205 Minnehaha. This will also allow the forested section in the northwest point of the property to be undisturbed, protecting the privacy of the neighbor's back yard at 5201 and 5205 Minnehaha: CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5) An engineered drainage plan was submitted to mitigate drainage concerns of the new plat. We are also working with the neighbor at 4201 52"d Street West, who abuts the property to the north, in using our site to improve drainage off his property. A 500' area study was conducted to calculate the median lot width, depth, and are of all homes within a 500' radius. The proposed subdivided lots exceed the median depth and area by a significant amount. In fact, these new lots will be among the deepest and largest lots within 500'. The new proposed lots will be larger than 70% of the lots in the 500' area study. The proposed lots are below the 70.5' median lot width and will require a variance for median lot width. The 70.5' median lot width is heavily skewed by the 25 smaller lots on Juanita, Indianola, and Halifax. While part of the 500' area study, these blocks have a different character than the lots on Minnehaha and 5200/5300 Halifax which are mostly 60' wide lots. We believe the preliminary plat meets the findings for a variance from median lot width as follows: 1. Relieves practical difficulties: Practical difficulty is due to the fact that original owner purchased two lots and combined them into one lot. The requested variance to split this lot is reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The proposed subdivision would result in two lots more characteristic of the neighborhood. If the variance were denied, the applicant would be denied a subdivision of property which the lots would be the same or similar to existing lots in the immediate area. The lots to the north, south and east are similar in size as proposed. 2. Corrects extraordinary circumstances unique to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district: The circumstances unique to this property is that the previous owner bought two lots, built on and developed the site from two lots into one. That condition was not created by the applicant. 3. Be in harmony with general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance: Subdividing the double lot would result in two lots similar in size to existing neighboring lots. A new home meeting all the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance 4. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Two new single family homes would be constructed on lots similar in size to the lots to the north, south, and east. Other items to consider: The two new lots of this proposed subdivision will not only be similar in size to the lots in the immediate vicinity, but will be the largest lots of any recently approved subdivision in Edina. Because of the unique curved section of this part of the block, the lot frontages will actually be approximately 71' wide. Most previous subdivisions have required two variance whereas we are only seeking one variance. Non-existing easement: There is a 25' easement shown on the deed long the alley in the southeast corner of the property. Per Roxy Kuhl at The Hennepin County Recording Office, there is no documentation in their auditor's records as to the reason why this part was taken. The auditor expert and she stated that the owner DOES own that strip and that they recommend using the current legal description, which includes all of Lot 39. To date our surveyor has been unable to find any document that refers to this easement in our contacts with the city and the county so is unable to file a vacation of easement for this apparently non-existing easement. Thank you for taking the time to consider this application! CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT L 0 T 2 L 0 T L 0 T 4 880.b 74.5 875.2 870.60 x682.0 PRO4513 TREE \ PRESERVATION EASEMENT X 879.9 ROP 860.18 X 874. X 875.5 .00 X 875.2E 867.71 10 N13.4-5'19"W 8.00 PLAT 7.80 MEAS. • 871.1 Ilili mil .m.14110mailiese mositia 90 X 6 BUILDING SETBACK mos RaaB I 212.00 PLAT x2813 i34 MEA x 73 1 x873.2 x887,3 869.4% env 70.3TW 87" /2 N89'44'07"W 4 /% ag° E FLOOR-873.8 SILT FENCE (TYP,) EC/TREE PROTECTION LEGEND CRA01:/17G; Z.I?0,510/17 CONTROL 24/1(0 .77.A7A-7n7 _P_RO77C710/17 5:20.9 iflAWAYZAZ-Z4 BOUZA-1V,4.R..0, E..01/1‘4, .VN OVA-R.1ZZ PLAN . . . FIRE HYDRANT . . . . WATER VALVE . . . . MANHOLE . . . CATCH BASIN . . . . POWERPOLE . . . . LIGHT POLE .IRON MONUMENT FOUND . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET . EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES SILT FENCE / TREE PROTECTION FENCE FLOW ARROW PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION: First floor elevation of new construction not to exceed more than 1.0' higher than existing first floor elevation of 876.8. EXISTING ELEVATIONS: First Floor = 876.8 Tuck Under Garage = 868.0 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: TOTAL LOT (1&2) AREA = 28,168 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS TOTAL = 3,479 SF tioo oo° .27 o b 7.D 91 4f, 04.2,15 -75 DEED-- CO 869. L -= 5 8 DE ED __ EXCEPTION X"8644.s. x867.4 X 8 7. / ,.. ... POI OF BEGINNING: ......... PARCEL 2 EXCEPTION ........ 7 XV.1 x887.0 x868.0 867.8 870.38 868.1 87.1 87.7 NORTH UNE OF LOT 40, SOUTH UNE OF LOT 41 PARCEL PART OF LOT 41 E 261.70 MEAS. 883.0(684.1 BUILDING SETBACK 8138:X 4 0 881 9 Wt 882. X 878.4 - -80.5' - - 6' BUILDING SETBACK 877.6 X 876.8 6 BUI 78.5 x875.1 N. ><372.8 x873.9 BUILDING PAD 75.1 871.9 1872.8 20 N89.5 868.0 868,4 879., 431 1.3 1 0678.3E 8' 870.2 X 0 9.4 71.6 DRIVEWAY 10 X87 _&173.5 881 879 S89.53'17"E 226.53 §77.0 878.0 INC SETBACK - -1 02.5' - - 874 x875,8 869.00 870.28 C' x87:7-E1 X 868.4 ...... .-.0. x 877.3 868.8x At7 •Jo - T.N.H..870.09 867.1 886.70 8651Z5A,e") s z v es 868.0 -T1/4s, X 866.6 "7! 868.0x" 01.5 873.0 X2.2 LOT B LQ1.4C K EAST UNE OF LOT 41 Xe7e.ai 879.0 POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3, NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 05.8 -262 DEED-- 76I _ 00.5 ,-- PARCEL )1781 L 0 T 3 1 9 LOT 2 t x876.1 -23 lita El 8.1x 876.1q x 939,9 0 x888.9 x868,9 888.7 x884.1 X867.4 NOTE: 1. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. CITY OF EDINA. APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DE. r. X 876.5 X 873.7 878 x 874.9 878 871.1 20 PARCE ".....„..,-BUILDING PAD 79.4 X 881a x878.6 L 0 T 877.4x 87E6 x878.5 >c B BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC 131 ochen gin e e rin g .corn 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 507-995-2981 krye lleObloch a ngIne a ring. c orn H ENGINEERING SITE, GRADING, EC FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CHECKED KID tle L. Bloch SHEET X OF A"I 0,Y EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN olin 4-09-2021 49893 0 15 30 =I=In SCALE FEET 1" = 30' REV. NO DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION DESIGNED KLB DRAWN KLB 51_77 2411/:0 GY_/2_,4.40.1-11/GY .6'0UT.hr .iriARRIET PARK- STEINER LEGEND 2ND ADDITION 1 872.8 -..... . 4/6, 7o Noo nJ. . . . . FIRE HYDRANT cf Ob ° 4, aj v 2 • 7-, 9' .,D.) •C- , .>„ -4/,sN . . . . WATER VALVE `; 7 4 t,i, 4' ' 04,..4,,S; L 0 T 4 : : : 0 X888.9 x868,9 888.7 LOT LOT 2 X873.7 X878.5 x874.9 : : 1, N89'5.'7"E L 0 T 1 NORTH UNE OF LOT 40, SOUTH UNE OF LOT 41 PARCEL 3 PART OF LOT 41 261.70 MEAS. 20 880 ' EAST), 67110N 8I. E OF LOT 41 . . . . MANHOLE --75 DEED-- \ 6 `,...... ,-106 481• 884.1 • 879.8 870.6% sETBAc e-m,K--B86,21,78:-.5-ri.8_83.0( POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3, / \ . . . . CATCH BASIN L--5,9 DEED__ EXCEPTIONS/ 8 ... 0687.4 / 8 0 X 887.9/ Xka'l OI OF BEGINNING: .... • 's PARCEL 2 EXCEPTION .. s. PA ••• 8 8 7: ,w 2 ING ......____ 0745 6 X . X 884.1 8882.0 NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40. (t;-' \ PROP:gge MEE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 868 •••..... i 8888.0 . . . POWERPOLE . *leg. 8887.0 `C., . . . . LIGHT POLE rkR tga. x 867.4 888. 887.6 868.8x C. ....., •••• -I, BBB. 751, 877.40 13786 x878.5 ›c BUILDING PA-79.4--- X881.7 PARCE_ L 0 T .w PRESERVATION EASEMENT X882.8 --k 879 • r"-----... -...... X 879.9 , EFI 4 0 „,„ a . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND 887.5x 07.5.5 SITE FIENCHLIARK. 64;870.2 X , ^ ...,., I x ...""----------- X 878.6 t 88 . ji" it E N -4 k1 X878. (0.N.R°P' T.N.H,1370.09 ''''" 868.7x . . . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET • • SI'S C.B. (BEEFINE) 4fA,. Vg.' 4PC, amIra,, `1',.s d• 9 X 52.2 LOT 20 k. I.. k. ooir-- 4..,-)1 if-1 171.6 . . . . EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION X886.8 • k1x 4 04.7 n 'S. 870.3X X 7 .• 6 B 4' ‘ x 068.1 \ (OS *873.0 8878.4 B LQ C 1.4 K 1 41.-- ••••...... DRIVEWAY 10 4111' .23 I 877 9 ' -I. 01.. ..... DENOTES SILT FENCE / TREE PROTECTION FENCE ‘ -80.5.-- 6' BUILDING SETBACK ---",... X 1,3 888.88 4e • A1735 . 881 879 - ... MiNN C'D FLOW ARROW ,11',. 08 . 'Os STS See 4 '\• S89'53'17"E 226.53 /- -- A.. 88 ---' ... • g77.0 -.../i,/ TOP-888.4 • 8 .6 ‘ 8878.8 \ IS : 879.4 878.0 i ..., X :78.9 6 867.1 8868.4 874. PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL t..% V 420 if•i)0 :87.0TC % v. 888.10 6 BUILD 871.1 'I NG SETBACK - -102.5,- - ''' _______ 'EE 41 ..4. x 877.3 ......• PRO* r. , I 878.5 )3781 8876.5 8., .." -42' .p.• (-/C<. \I-- 887.0T • 88" w.X\ 't., -, X875.1 3r ., 677 889.0X 870.2 x C' • 'r X875.8 PARCEL L 0 T ><372.8 8873.9 liiA--- LOT -w/ „,.....„...---BUILDING r= 3 I 9 \ 2 1 \ xe3„0 1 ,/,,i.,x,376.1q 70 V i li ..-11 --7, 7`) 887.1TC -41.. &A 0 3r, o '§ 8871.9 ap.8 \ ,3 \ X 874) \ 2C X878.1 VIA X87 5 -... , I \ : .3 20 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION: • E I- 69.7 •.......- X 875.2G. )(373.0 X375.2 867. 10 % • - 8 • a +a• DRIVEWAY N13.45'19"W . 1 .. First floor elevation of new construction not to exceed (,. 871.1 ........-•\ I I .... X is more than 1.0' higher than existing first floor elevation 8.00 PLAT -4111111111V I 90' 6' BUILDING SETBACK I X874 1 ,.., go 2 -,3 7.80 MEAS. -.....-,- -.1.1117- .1- ..... 4.1311.41- X r"7-47172, X874.3 "...... \ . Al .....--) 8874.6i 874. of 876.8. 66.8 x887.3 ON X_873.1 0 212.00 PLAT 212.34 MEAS. 8 873.1 X 873.2 \ 867.2TC 889.4X 873.4 B70.32/ EXISTING ELEVATIONS: / ;://,. N89.44.07"W N 0 First Floor = 876.8 1. O 77 Tuck Under Garage = 868.0 87 IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS (LOT 1): r ,/, GARAGE F10012.0373.8 L 0 T 3 8 r #5217 rn / TOTAL LOT 1 AREA = 15,144 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 3,001 SF = 20% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 6,316 = 42% INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS = 22% CITY OF EDINA NO NEW IMPERVIOUS DIRECTED TO PRI ALLEY. VATE PROPERTIES. 1.N SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY APR 0 9 2021 OR PLANNING DEPAP, I. ivh_1\41- SI DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. REV. NO. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER DESIGNED N BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC SHEET MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I All A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE NUT blochengineering,corn SITE, GRADING, EC FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD c 1 0 15 30 LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN B °-'-' I==MI= KLB ‘Posll 10. i 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 OF SCALE FEET CHECKED ENGINEERING 507-995-2981 1" = 30' II.E. K.1•Sti e L. Bloch o,,,,, 4-09-2021 KLB Kong.] cObloch engine a ring.corn EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN siroAwK4 _rER POLLUTION _PAW V_S1VTIO/1/- _PLAN (517P_P_P) SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. Implement sediment control practices in order to minimize sediment from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm drain inlets. 2. Install all temporary or permanent sediment control measures Including silt fence at perimeter of construction, rock construction entrances, sediment filters, silt socks, and sedimentation basins prior to beginning site clearing, grading, or other land-disturbing activity. 3. Establish sediment control practices on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices must be Installed before the next precipitation event even= if the short-term activity is not complete. 4. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 5. If the down gradient treatment system becomes overloaded, install additional up gradient sediment control practices or redundant BMP5 in order to eliminate the overloading. 6. Before beginning construction, install a TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE at each point where vehicles exit the construction site. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2inch) diameter rock, MNDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2. CA-3. Or equal Coarse Aggregate. Place the aggregate in a layer at least 152 mm (6 inches) thick across the entire width of the entrance. Extend the rock entrance at least 15 m (50 feet) into the construction zone. Use MNDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material beneath the aggregate in order to prevent migration of soil into the rock from below. Maintain the entrance in a condition that will prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto paved roadways. Provide periodic top dressing with additional stone as required. Close entrances protected by temporary rock construction entrances to all construction traffic. 7. If necessary, clean the wheels of construction vehicles in order to remove soils before the vehicles leave the construction site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains into an approved sediment trapping device. 8. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall be on a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep. If necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposal area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 9. Soil Stockpiles: Install silt fence or other effective sediment controls around all temporary soil stockpiles. Locate soil or dirt stockpiles such that downslope drainage length is no less than 8 m (25 feet) from the toe of the pile to a surface water, including Stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits sand ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the Stormwater. If remaining for more than 7 days, stabilize the stockpiles by mulching, vegetative cover, tarps, or other means. During street repair, cover construction soil or dirt stockpiles located closer than 8 m (25 feet) to a roadway or drainage channel with tarps, and protect storm sewer inlets with silt socks or staked silt fence. 10. Silt Fence: Install silt fence along the contour (on a level horizontal plane) with the ends turned up (1-hooks) in order to help pond water behind the fence. Install the silt fence on the uphill side of the support posts. Provide a post spacing of 1.2 m (4 feet) or less. Drive posts at least 0.6 m (2 feet) into the ground. Anchor the silt fence fabric in a trench at least 152 mm (6 inches) deep and 152 mm (6 inches) wide dug on the upslope side of the support posts. Lay the fabric in the trench and then backfill and compact with a vibratory plate compactor. Make any splices in the fabric at a fence post. At splices, overlap the fabric at least 152 mm (6 inches), fold it over, and securely fasten it to the fencepost. Silt fence supporting posts shall be 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb. per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet). Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage. Geotextile fabric shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, furnished in a continuous roll in order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform In texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 11. Maintain all temporary erosion and sediment control devices in place until the contributing drainage area has been stabilized (hard-surfaced areas paved and vegetation established in a greenspace). Repair any rilling, gully formation, or washouts. After final establishment of permanent stabilization, remove all temporary synthetic, structural, and nonbiodegradable erosion and sediment control devices and any accumulated sediments. Dispose of off-site. Restore permanent sedimentation basins to their design condition immediately following stabilization of the site. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 1. Inspect the entire construction site at least once every 7 days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in a 24-hour period. Following an inspection that occurs within 24 hours after a rainfall event, the next inspection must be conducted within 7 days after that rainfall event. 2. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMP5, infiltration areas, and stabilized areas. 3. Record all inspections and maintenance conducted during construction in writing and keep these records. The inspections and maintenance records must include date and time of inspections, date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 0.5 inches in a 240hour period, name of person(s) conducting inspections, findings of inspections, recommendations for corrective actions, and any corrective actions taken. 4. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs in order to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Repair, replace, or supplement any nonfunctional BMPs with functional BMPs within 24 hours after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access unless another time frame is specified. 5. Remove accumulated sediment deposits from behind erosion and sediment control devices as needed. Do not allow sediment to accumulate to a depth of more than one-third of the height of the erosion and sediment control devices. Repair, replace, or supplement deteriorated, damaged, rotted, or missing erosion control devices within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 6. Repair, replace, or supplement all silt fences when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 7. Clean sedimentation basins, storm sewer catch basins, ditches, and other drainage facilities as required In order to maintain their effectiveness. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and they sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches% of the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 8. Inspect surface waters (including drainage ditches and conveyance systems) evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. Remove all deltas and sediment deposited. Stabilize areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must be completed within 7 days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of obtaining access. 9. Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall be on a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep. If necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposal area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 10. Perform any corrective measures ordered by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. Install any additional erosion protection or sediment control measures deemed necessary by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. POLLUTION PREVEINTION MEASURES: 1. Solid Waste: Dispose of collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris, and other waste properly off-site in compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. 2. Hazardous Materials: Properly store oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances in order to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Include secondary containment. Restrict access to storage areas in order to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous materials must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. 3. Other Materials: Dispose of unused building materials, garbage, trash, cleaning wastes, toxic materials, and wastewater properly off-site and in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements. 4. Furnish suitable trash containers and regularly remove the accumulated trash from the premises. 5. Do not allow solid waste, hazardous materials, and other materials to be carried by runoff into a receiving water or storm sewer system. 6. Limit external washing of trucks and other construction vehicles to a defined area of the site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains into an approved sediment trapping device. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing is prohibited. 7. Concrete Washout Operations: Contain all liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations in a leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. Do not allow the liquid and solid wastes to contact the ground. Prevent runoff from the concrete washout operations or areas. Dispose of liquid and solid wastes properly In compliance with MPCA regulations. Install a sign adjacent to each washout facility in order to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. 8. Sanitary and Septic Waste: Furnish and install detached portable toilet facilities at the construction site. The portable toilets shall be conveniently located for the use of all workers on the project. Maintain the facilities in a clean, dry, sanitary condition in accordance with MN Dept of Health requirements. SOIL STABILIZATION: 1. Water and maintain seeded or sodded areas on a timely day-to-day basis. In the event of a seeding failure, reseed and remulch the areas where the original seed has failed to grow and perform additional watering as necessary at no additional cost to the Owner. Promptly replace all sod that dries out to the point where it is presumed dead and all sod that has been damaged, displaced, weakened, or heavily infested with weeds at no additional cost to the Owner. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc) on the development site before work begins. 2. Avoid removal of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest practical area of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. 3. Following initial soil disturbance or redisturbance, complete permanent or temporary stabilization against erosion due to rain, wind, and running water as soon as possible, but in no case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including Stormwater management pond sideslopes. This requirement does not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on which grading, site building, or other construction activities are actively underway. 4. Provide temporary grass seed cover on all topsoil stockpiles and other areas of stockpiled excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged periods of open, bare earth without grass cover will not be permitted. Stabilize all disturbed';' OF EDINA greeenspace areas with a minimum of 4" topsoil immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and mulch, or sod and stake these areas within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be paved using early application of gravel base. APR 0 9 021 6. Apply necessary moisture to the construction area in order to prevent the spread of dust. MATERIALS: 1. Storm Sewer Inlet Protection: The following are approved inlet sediment control devices: a. Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 23 (fits rough opening for 2'x3' inlet), Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 27 (fits rough opening for 27" inlet), Or Road Drain Top Slab Model CG 3067 (fits Neena Casting with 35-1/4" x 17-3/4" dimensions) manufactured by WMCO, 799 Theis Drive, Shakopee, MN, 55379, Phone (952) 233-3055. b. Silt Sock: Regular flow (40 gal/min/sq. ft.) Average width strength equal to 165.0 lbs/in, ASTM D-4884. Rectangular siltsock on rectangular inlets. Round siltsock on round inlets. Use ACF Environmental, Inc., 2831 cardwell Road, Richmond, VA 23234, Phone (800) 448-3636, or approved equal. c. InfraSafe Sediment Control Barrier. Install geotextile sock on the outside of the barrier in order to trap additional fines. Standard frames are available to fit 24" to 30" diameter and 2'x3' openings. Distributed by ROYAL ENTERPRISES AMERICA, 30622 Forest Boulevard, Stacy, MN 55079, Phone (651) 462-2130. 2. Topsoil: Topsoil used for finish grading of areas to be turfed or planted shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specifications 3877 for topsoil borrow modified to contain no more than 35% sand. Topsoil shall be reasonably free of subsoil, heavy clay, coarse sand, stones, and other objects over 51 mm (2 inches) in diameter, and without plants, roots, sticks, and other objectionable material. 3. Geotextile Fabric for Subgrade Stabilization (if required): MnDOT Standard Specification 373 Type V permeable geotextile material. 4. Supporting Posts for Silt fence: 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet). Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage. 5. Silt Fence Fabric: MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, furnished in a continuous roll in order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform in texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 6. Aggregate For Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: 25 mm (1 Inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 7. Geotextile Fabric for Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: MnDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material. 8. Aggregate for Block and Rock Sediment Filter: 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 9. Block and Rock Inlet Filters: Block and Rock Inlet Filters consist of open-core concrete masonry blocks, wire screen with 12 mm (0.5 inch) openings, and washed rock. Place open-core concrete masonry blocks lengthwise on their sides around the catchbasin inlet. Place wire screen around the perimeter to the top of the block barrier before the rock is placed. The screen prevents the rocks from being washed through blocks. Place rock against wire mesh to top of blocks. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. Install two courses of 8" block to form a barrier height of 16". 10. Biodegradable Erosion Control Blankets: In accordance with MnDOT Standard Specifications 3885. 11. Erosion Control Matting: LandLok TRM 450 Turf Reinforcement Mat manufactured by Propex, Inc. (www.geotextile.com <http://www.geotextile.com >), or approved equal soil erosion control matting. 12. Staples: Staples used to anchor erosion control blankets shall be U-shaped, 3mm diameter of heavier steel wire. The span width at the crown shall be a minimum of 25 mm (1 inch). Staples shall have a length of 250 mm (10 inches) or more from the top to bottom after bending. PLANNING DEPARTMENT B BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC blochanglnearIng.com 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 507-995-2981 krietteOblochengineering.com H ENGINEERING REV. NO. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION SHEET C2 OF SWPPP FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER DESIGNED MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE KIJ3 LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Klystle L. Bloch EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 49893 EMS 3-25-2021 rtiO. DRAWN KLB CHECKED KLB BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC blochengIneeding.com 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 507-995-2981 lurtleOblochengineering.com SWPPP DETAILS FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD sro.Ril11/-241-27? POLLUTION _PRZVA7/17_77_10N- _PLAN (517.P_P_P) .4'. .41I Z?9• % G -,9: le,V .."3-• AP•••••••••••1114., .4.10 _411,4._e_te p _e_. , qr 111111111111, - ii.v... i I • •11%. 1111j1 6" MIN. -•••1101:4411.41411.41411411 dill. . 1-1/2' TO WASHED ROCK `," 44.4411/1/1"... 4.41.0144/41110.10, 0'1°11 ill 4. 401_10_04111011141,.. IPIPIPIPIIIIIPIPOSMIP, ................ SOS•11••••W•0114. 10.411.4011.0). V lifigle.,,,e00 10.10011114411011 4%0.110, • 400.10.411.11/01F ••44:4111441110***MIIIP 4 •-•41i.14•••••••'40' --.10.0.416.00,..414 •-•%,....• /.4 Vr 2-1/2' AN ADDITIONAL IS WRAPPED AROUND 2'X4' AND STAPLED GEOTEXTILE 8' NIH, GREATER SIDES OF THE PLACE GEOTEXTILE INLET COVER. 0 ALL MEET 18' OF GEOTEXTILE THE WOOD L SIZE SHALL BE ON ALL UNDER GEOTEXTILE USED SPEC. 3886 FOR •.,.. ..:. ,,,, GRATE ; .t,.. ,,,,..... W .. 00D L '.."... L , .(1, LLL LLL L LL LLL FOR INLET PROTECTION MACHINE SLICED TYPE C SPEC. 3891 ..."...\ •Stx. LL SILT 2'X4' WIDTH ON ?/ ...- SHALL FENCE INLET COVER. EXTENDED 8' BEYOND BOTH SIDES. i PLASTIC ZIP TIES (5 LB. TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" DIRECTION OF RUNOFF —rLIILTCT-- DESIGN GUIDELINES! MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA' 11) OST LENGTH, ;# 7-11',IIN. AT Ill SPACING GEOTEXTILE I 1 MACHINE 12" DEPTH 8" RAP 3 ACRES 6 4 '''':. ) SLICE 5 FT. FT. MAX. 8" - ( PLUS —pi 1....-3' LEVEL (MIN.) 4' OVERLAP ANCHOR SI OT AITFRNATIVF / / FABRIC, .. ..... 1' SPACING ON STAPLES i FOLD UNDER 6" EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TYPE C INLET PROTECTION STANDARD MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE PLANNING DEPAR I- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 5209 Minnehaha Blvd Tree Survey and Plan Tree Diameter/Heigh Within 10' of build pad/utility or 5' of Protect (P) driveway/right Tree 8 Species t Tree Health Remove (R) of way? 1 Maple 10" Good P N 2 Maple 10" Good P N 3 Maple 10" Good P N 4 Maple 14" Good P N 5 Pine 6' Good P N 6 Pine 6' Poor P Y Trim 7 Pine 22' Fair P N Trim 8 Deciduous 8" Good R Y 9 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 10 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 11 Deciduous 10" Good P r 12 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 13 Deciduous 16" Good P Y 14 Deciduous 8" Good P N 15 Deciduous 20" Good P Y 16 Maple 16" Good P Y 17 Maple 16" Good P Y 18 Pine 28' Good P Y 19 Oak 16" Good P V 20 Deciduous 8" Good P N 21 Deciduous 8" Poor R N 22 Oak 20" Good R Y 23 Oak 10" Good R Y 24 Oak 32" Fair R Y 25 Deciduous 10" Good R Y 26 Elm 26" Good P Y 27 Deciduous 14" Poor R Y 28 Deciduous 32' Good P N 29 Butternut 20" Good P N 30 Oak 18" Good P N 31 Oak 12" Good R Y 32 Oak 12" Good R Y 33 Deciduous 10" Good R Y 34 Deciduous 8" Good P Y 35 Butternut 16" Good P N 36 Deciduous 8" Good P N 37 Deciduous 8" Good P N CITY OF EDINA 38 Deciduous 8" Good P N 39 Butternut 10" Good P N 40 Butternut 12" Good P Y APR 0 9 2021 41 Butternut 12" Good P Y 42 Deciduous 28" Good R Y 43 Elm 20" Good R Y PLANNING DEPART ., 44 Deciduous 16" Good P Y 45 Oak 24" Good P N 46 Deciduous 10" Good P N 47 Oak 12" Good P Y 48 Oak 12" Good P Y 49 Deciduous 10" Good R Y 50 Deciduous 16" Good R Y 51 Deciduous 16" Poor R Y 52 Deciduous 8" Poor R Y 53 Deciduous 24" Poor R Y 54 Oak 24" Poor R Y 55 Deciduous 18" Good P N 56 Deciduous 18" Good P N Total Trees Protect Remove 56 38 18 t I CENTERLINE OF FENCE CORNER 0.6' SOUTH OF PROPERTY UNE / 1 ,..:,.• .?, ...., X 847 •-3.,., • v',. x876.5 ., n I t "f• I / ‘./ 1.1 L,. r`,., 1/4, I. 4 1 r,fl Tkc Oak? 17; R I E I F) F; l< -r s F o -11r f:t• 868.4 AQ 07.6 _ SrreD 14"0EciD --138 X 573.2 I R r, rk v u I r‘ -r L. LA I " V A / Sr5' C.B • L2 2,1L111.14;:i !Am, 1?`101 rks' xaor.i 866 14 0 ' y866.4 , 8654* SIS C.B. (BEEHIVE) x 4/<6 at1.4.es5.0 eaco /sr.. oft '4 X867.3 POWs UEGANTIG: PARCEL 2 EXCEPTION 866.9 *.s-•••• N867.0 „ N. 666$' c 1; 3 >28E8.9 - ..66 6 loica 867.011: `se 1 ."-N t 866.6 10144PLE;- F * 86 9 • ekra • VpreloCt (C '• 1167.0TCO 867.3 ¨ • • 67.1 , \N1 5 19"W y4 77.7 x‘ 10 8.00 PLATr---- 7.80 MEAS.' \' ? + 887.2TC 60.BUTTERNUT • 867. ITC X878.6 t'2';-i t t X868.7 GO, kt0/2 r.13M..'•2b4 • *81 '3 , x 8\78.4 81.4 -I- coir : :DFCID •1 • \ -• . C . - :89'53'17"E 226.53 • ' 32"DECID 2., 411 - - -(467.1 - 7 x 1611,4 \ r - 83p. T-BUILOM SETBX - - - • , • • 869.tx 0. V V' is 0 ‘1;167 7 % \ \ Z 7 0 867.6x x 88a.° 867.4 "...;:1 6tort.o. t 868.0A ;E. 22••PINE 810.6x •-- 42-375.5 3 a'6,„ 870.2x 8'D CIO. Tiro %1 X 867.3 PROPO En DRivEWAy 866.8 ; X 1 ST Lt 873.0 870. X * 1 112.5 31.87 X867.3 868.0 877.4x 878 s„ , ' N s NI x875.1 X8745.@ - .t• 1 ',.. .4 t .sj4:6).8.1-' 3'. 9.6>c. ‘t‘t) •-• 28 wOFILL,,. 01 -. -, a `.2A - A.... .. „...r..--auttpaio, /5; - 1 ) , . . X469.7 A %11 it I 67,9' 869.4* 2' 1 x 06 6 - -262 DEED- -ty 6 , e WILDING SETBarr • - -80,5'-- J • 8 ----- -BUILDING IPAD• 873.4 y- CENTF.RUNE OF FENCE 0.1' NORTH OF PROPERTY UNE • -.s78 91* '70.5 x 878.5 ,/ic8/31.7, PARC 2"0AZ * .2 LOT 8 141SIDS:1 -•-) -SA64- '10.94 20.0414 - - to A . *876,1 1VDECID. E •DECID. 24`0AK 73 0 ortt s..„..*87 .2_ _ _ _ -• COEC'El *8724 roma?" N89'5127"E AI .70 M P EAS. I NORTH LINE OF LOT 40, SOUTH LINE OF LOT 41 873.6 X871.9 .3 212.00 PLAT 212.34 MEAS. X 3. 81.3.1 ///// N89'44'07"W go 4 -,---1 , ,9 11 - -....-7 - 8,7y. X41187 ,5 .... i , a. ( i i-Dic81.98.k co .' i • -PARCEL -,,,cil .., ,.., L . %.., 1 1....s.....,-- .... , --; -1° ?0/IlbNEC10. 7' \f 1 *88 0 Wm. i p'OECiO 3r 4:n0 °V2A, 882. 881.9 PARCEL 3-1 ART OF LOT 41-, J Jr0ECIO 'PROPOSED DRA;NVAY 10 (.-5• -3- t.- (W9.4 CENTERLINE OF FENCE CORNER 0.1' NORTH OF PROPERTY UNE x 877.3 7,1.. ..r4,_ t -28-PINE REPOSED TREE 30PRESERVATION EASEMENT 18'0AR Jot 8-0ECIELL *879 9 16-BUTTERNUT *876.5 1 87 .o 20 EAST LINE OF LOT 41 X 879.8q 879.6 -POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3. NOR7HEAST CORNER OF LOT 40. SOUTHEAST C0,1214ER or tor 41 X 878.3i. ,2 ELILUT j x 876.Iq I 2-BUTTERNUT \ dt 87 5 CENT RUNE OF FENCE 0.6• \ NORTH OF PROPERTY LINE I L- 2 4 r • TH HA BE CENTERLINE OF FENN' NORTHEASTERLY OF P LOT 873.0*-r „,/,, 7// nnr. ro-r CITY OF EDINP, APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NOM \ , 74. 30 s:o noon-cite 1 r, L. NJ I CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTNT X677,3 16 SAN WTE-1- Fence Stone Sewer Sanitary Sewer Water Main Underground Gas Retaining Wall Storm Cotch Basin Power Pole Water Shutoff Well Hydrant Dilating Devotion Top of Curb Devotion Top of Wall Elevation Existing Contour 0 O x900.0 x903.0TC 0900.01W • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT, AS DENOTED O DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT 1/2N14' IRON PIPE INSCRIBED RLS 15230 THE SOUTH UNE OF LOT 39, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDMON, IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF N89,44'07-1Y. 1 BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING LOT UNES, AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY UNES, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. L _ _ _ REVISIONS SCALE 1" = 20' JOB NO. 484-20 REMARK. DATE BOOK/PAGE DRAWN ChM REFERENCE SHEET 1 of 1 -MU COMMITMENT FILE NO. 20774 ISSUED NOVEMBER 03, 2020 BY STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY ZONING- R-1 Single Dwelling Unit PRELIMINARY PLAT SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER 2ND ADDITION 20 20 40 PROPOSED JOT AREAS. Lot I = 15,144 SF Lot 2 = 13,024 SF I SCALE IN FEET LEGEND 872.4 072.0 DEED __ DCEPD017 1405.4 g 4100. L1 16 7" , • ../n0.3 0 11 1 .71.1 OeLS‘ --75 DEED- 4b`s.s-..... 0007.3 PONT Of NEONIINk a 07 0 1 L. NJ 1 0 CEINERINE OF OA' sown or 6' oe til 6 ems 0,„ DOW. TWE 668.8x k / 6 N .1107A ern.1 0'1 2lls• 065. STS (300INE) 8600 X075.1 to \ N13.45.19"IN 8.00 PLAT 7.80 MEAS. \ 60101377131/017 X 6/37.3 66.4X 11111Mint ono 30 xilee 67,2" gull mu SETBACKS. Front Street Average Adjoining Homes = 44.2' Interior Side Yard = 12' total with no less than 5' on one side Rear Yard = 25' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION. First floor elevation of new construction not to exceed more than 1.0' higher than existing first floor elevation of 8768. •N P El EVATIONS: First Floor = 876.8 Tuck Under Garage = 868.0 EXISTING I OT COVERAGE. Lot Area = 28,168 SF COVERAGE: House = 2,065 SF Total = 2,065 SF = 7.3% 25X Moximurn Allowable Lot Coverage pROPERrf DESCRIPTIONS- PARCEL 1 Lot Thirty-nine (39), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition', according to the map or plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Subject to building and zoning laws and to restrictions of record. PARCEL 2 Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), South Harriet Pork, 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State. Less and except: All that part or portion of Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition', according to the plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, bounded and described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot, 262 feet West of the Northeast corner of said lot, and running thence West on and along the North line of sold Lot 75 feet to Minnehaho Boulevard, thence Southeasterly on and along the North line of said Minnehoho Boulevard 58 feet, thence Northeasterly 22.1 feet to the place of beginning, including all of first parties' right, title and interest in and to any port of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record. PARCEL 3 All that part of Lot Forty-one (41), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition" described os follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 41, thence West on the South line thereof 262 feet, thence North at right angles a distance of One (1) foot, thence East of right angles and parallel to the South line of said lot to a point in the East line of said lot, thence Southeasterly along the Eost line of said lot the point of beginning, according to the map or plat thereof on file in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including all of first parties right, title and interest In and to any part of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record, if any. 11.000 70NE DESIGNATION. Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City of Edina Community-Panel No. 27051m362E, effective November 04, 2016, depicts the property hereon to be located In Zone X on area of minimal flooding. EMI ,bi i xi ng sti n elilitin n g . dimensions are measured to the finished siding and not the bt, g -No search was made for any easements. -The location of all utilities shown are from either observed evidence in the field and/or from plans famished by the utility companies and are approximate. Utility companies should be notified for exact location before doing any excavation. CENTERLINE OF FENCE CONNER NORM UNE Of LOT 40. 0.1' NORM OF PROPERTY SOUTH LINE OF LOT 41 F3131:2, !Ili 101,88/0. 434?...„7._ Or/ 3 IF:+5.) 7 lt.'. 6338, 7 • , xe7a.. ta \ X B81.7 PARCE 2 , / z (% L. 0 Tv' 4 C/„,,,„ / L-- -/ -- 45,13...../ " / \ , \_. • .10,,, , 1 / *1 . 14: 0 #1;* _j _'., \ 1.4 / xemai \ . 1 \ -.)T \ xe4i4 QCK -ri I , r "66 ) - 9 M - --8°4.7 .81=0.AE0 44; / - - '..- .,-",..,, . A.._ <,'''./ S89'53'17"E 226.53 oli -PAaat -r L. V I 677 11751 LOT Tr~1.11 \ - - _-6]6- \ N N Ii;1388/D. 07f 5714 / j 212.00 PLAT 212.34 MEAS. N8944.07"W Of FENCE OA' OF PROPERTY UNE rn SOUTH HA B L. 0 C K 4 RR1ET P ARK STE 1NER A TN rs L/ I L. 5../ I 1 n -r L. NJ I 673.0 1 PART OF LOT 41 89'5 7"E 261.70 MEAS. • 01702 - 'STEMS: 's 7197.4,, Nal 7,075.0 PARCEL PRESERVATION 42 , 20 \ UNE OF LOT 41 7.172.0O OF BEGINNIK PARCEL 3, NORTWAST CORNER Of LOT 40. SOUTHEAST CRRNER OF LOT 41 COMMUNE OF MICE 0.1' NORM OF PROPERff WOE 2818.0 one X6]3,9 - "- 2 _020 -- 2 3 8 "4V1376.2 C3 *Welt 11.121,3/7 ,-678 CENTERLINE 21301TERIUT 6 OE 77 \ X875.28_ \ 0,5 \ 674 z874.0R\ FENCE OF O A' OFF UNE DRAINAGE AND unury EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: SITE ADDRESS 5209 Mamba& Blvd. Bala, MN 55424 BENCHMARK city Ikochmalc T.N.H. on the east side of MInneltalta Blvd at bowel/5229. Mention = 870,51. Bibs Bestetannic T.N.H. at the northwest corner of subjat property. Elevation = 870.09. I hereby certify that this survey, pion, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I urn a duly registered Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DAUM 03-29-2021 W000ltoW A. BROWN, R.LJ3. MN REG 15290 W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. SOSO CEDAR AVENUE Be., Swig 225. BLoommErros, MN 55425 131... (952) 8544055 FA. (952) 8544288 EMAIL: INFOeWBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COM R.T. DOC. NO. C.R. DOC. NO. LEGEND • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT. AS DENOTED 0 DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT 1/2"x14" IRON PIPE INSCRIBED RLS 15230 THE SOUTH UNE OF LOT 39, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF 1039•44'0710. CITY OF EDINA DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 5---I 4 APR 0 9 2021 SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER 2ND ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, fee owner of the following described property situated In the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to-wit: Parcel 1: Lot Thirty-nine (39), Block Two (2), 'South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition', according to the map or plat thereof on file and of record In the office of the Register of Deeds In and for said County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Subject to building and zoning laws and to restrictions of record. Parcel 2: Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record In the office of the Register of Deeds In and for said County and State. Less and except: All that part or portion of Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition', according to the plat thereof on file and of record In the office of the Register of Deeds In and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, bounded and described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at a point on the North line of said Lot, 262 feet West of the Northeast corner of said lot, and running thence West on and along the North line of said Lot 75 feet to M inn ehaha Boulevard, thence Southeasterly on and along the North line of said MInnehaha Boulevard 58 feet, thence Northeasterly 22.1 feet to the place of beginning, Including all of first parties' right, title and Interest in and to any part of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record. \ created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. 4/„, OJ , \ Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER 205 ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the public, for public use, the easements as 4'0 0. In witness whereof, Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this _ day of .t.,, 7.0 . ,...b..„, Oe.,,I,s ''' L ... V I I \ 20 . r,-,' ,,, 46',,7.0:: I rs T 41-1 Signed: '0), \\ PARCEL. Scott Elwyn, PrmIdent Margaret Busyn, Vice President N89'56'27"E 261.70 U1 /EAST LINE OF LOT 41 ,- -_, POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3, - -L :5-785 DEED- - t\ — — - -262 DEED-- 0 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 \ i 1 `--NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40, •?' PA RC E L BEGINNING: BEGINNING: NORTH UNE OF LOT 40, C- PARCEL 2 EiCEPTION SOUTH LINE OF LOT 41 \ 6' 9 \ \ C.k. PARCEL. 2 —1 LT 1 r, -,- 40 to -- Os ,___ .k. 4 N _ V I -.. .? . °SO i'lir, . \ CD IN -- ..'iti• \ LOT 1 ,- ,a, M / NA,R, ir Q \ BLOCK 1 ....._ , 7, -- .... /,46/4 . ., S89'53'17"E 226.53 ri 1- V PI STATE OF MINNESOTA VA This Instrurnent was acknowledged before met* _day of 20 by Scott Sown, President, and Margaret Busyn, Vice President, 0 • \ \ ..( COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ( - -1 --- \ -' of Great Neighborhood Hanes, Inc, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. V, 6 \ t \ c /... \ ci, Tts \ 1, PARCEL. U County, Minnesota /3 \ \ L . V I I rs T 39 )- -73 \ \. \ Signature Printed Name \ /1 \ Notary CommissionrY Pubr Es p i r e s \ (1 \ '21 U.s* \ \ LOT 2 1 I, Woodrow & Brown, de hereby certify that this at was PrePared by me or under my direct Supervision; that 1 arn a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of \ Minnesota; that this plat Is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on this Plet hrve been, or will be correcttY set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, \ \ \ N13'45'19"W 7.80 MEAS.—....--. r 3 -2:. Dated this day of 20 . \ Section 505.01 Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. (8.00 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION) c-) \ 212.34 MEAS. (212.00 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION) \ N89'44'07"W WoodrowA. Brown, Licensed Land Surveyor PJ )> Minnesota License No. 15230 C) STATE OF MINNESOTA L . V This Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20 by WoodrowA. Brown, Tkensed Land SSurveyor \ ‘ i n I 5 E3 -I- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CD Signature Printed Name 30 \ Notary Public, County, Minnesota MY Commission Euyires Parcel 3: All that part of Lot Forty-one (41), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition" described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 41, thence West on the South line thereof 262 feet, thence North at right angles a distance of One (1) foot, thence East at right angles and parallel to the South line of said lot to a point in the East line of said lot, thence Southeasterly along the East line of said lot the point of beginning, according to the map or plat thereof on file in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Including all of first parties right, title and Interest in and to any part of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record, if any. SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER LJ . 20 20 30 CITY COUNCIL, COY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER 290 ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 20 and said plat Is In compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 500.03 Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: Mayor By: City Manager RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20_ and prior years have been paid for land described on the plat, dated this day of 20_. Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By: Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 3839.5E5(1969), this plat has been approved this day of 20 . Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of SOUTH HARRIET PARK STEINER 2ND ADDITION was filed Intl* office this Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By: Deputy day of 20_, at o'clock BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING LOT ONES, MD 10 FEET IN WIDTH, ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. SCALE IN FEET W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. PLANNING DEPARTMEAT 20 0 20 40 25% Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage TITLE COMMITMENT FILE NO. 20774 ISSUED NOVEMBER 03, 2020 BY STEWART TIRE GUARANTY COMPANY LOT COVERAGE: Lot Area - 27,827 SF COVERAGE: House = 2,065 SF Total 3115 SF Fence STS Storm Sewer WTR—I— lesettbs4logewer Underground Cos Retaining Wall Storm Catch Basin O Power Pole O Water Shutoff 6) Well Hydrant x900.0 Existing Elevation x900.0TC Top of Curb Elevation x900.01W Top of Wall Elevation Existing Contour LEGEND EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR: GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES PARK RR1ET W. OWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 8030 CEDAR rWl.Nue SO., SUITE 228. BLooNotoroN, MN 55425 Stn: 1952/ 1354.4055 FA. 19521854-0268 EAW INFOOWBROWNL ANDSURVEYING.COM SITE ADDRESS 5209 MiOnehrtha Blvd. Edina, MN 55424 BENCHMARK City Became& T.N. dm east sklo corn er nha BIrd. el house 43229. Marrtko 870.51. SitoBendrosto T.N.IE at Go near.. of subject property. Dentior, 270.0?. I hereby certify that tide survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stole of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DAUB: 01-20-2021 WOODROW A. BROWN, R.L.O. MN REG 16290 • DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT, AS DENOTED O DENOTES SET IRON MONUMENT 1/2N14" IRON PIPE INSCRIBED RLS 15230 \ 571.4 572.11 I I 14 I 867. PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS. PARCEL I Lot Thirty-nine (39), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition", according to the map or plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for sold County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota. Subject to building and zoning lows and to restrictions of record. PARCEL 2 Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition, according to the plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County and State. Less and except: AO that port or portion of Lot Forty (40), Block Two (2), "South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition% according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds In and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, bounded and described as follows, to-wit: Commencing at o point on the North line of said Lot, 262 feet West of the Northeast corner of said lot, and running thence West on and along the North line of said Lot 75 feet to Minnehaha Boulevard, thence Southeasterly on and along the North line of said Minnehaho Boulevard 58 feet, thence Northeasterly 22.1 feet to the place of beginning, including all of first parties' right, title and interest in and to any part of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record. PARCEL 3 All that part of Lot Forty-one (41), Block Two (2), 'South Harriet Park, 2nd Addition' described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 41, thence West on the South tine thereof 262 feet, thence North at right angles a distance of One (1) foot, thence East at right angles and parallel to the South line of said lot to a point in the Eost One of said lot, thence Southeasterly along the East line of said lot the point of beginning, according to the map or plat thereof on file in the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota, including all of first parties right, title and interest in and to any part of any street or alley adjacent to said premises, vacated or to be vacated. Subject to building and zoning laws and restrictions of record, if any. DOM -All existing building dimensions are measured to the finished siding and not the building foundation. -No search was made for any easements. -The location of all utilities shown are from either observed evidence in the field and/or from plans furnished by the utility companies and are approximate. Utility companies should be notified for exact location before doing any excavation. 2 CENTER111,E OF FENCE CORNER SOLnli OF LSE PARCEL `tIt ZONIS ^ EiRi oF LOT 41 N89'56'27"E 261.70 MEAS. 875.4 87,50i. 078.8 41 CENIERLINE OF FENCE LER 0.1' NOM OF PM\ NNE an \ UNE OF WI 41 -PONT Cf 8014711710 PARCEL 3, NORRIEAST CORNER OF LOT 40, SOIMEAST CCBSER OF LOT 41 OF Paten' 1170.4 r- IM 0 ECID ea CO () .23 2bEW 0011117011817 /5205 CARS. ROOR-571.07 v7/ A/ 4 ,„ 467 •-• E. 867.17c i/\667.7 ,10 \ NOS. :60 57 77C 0 6' -X-867.1 867.1 x8573 8 am 87246 49%),‘).:41)1, Bl 44,:?Z, • -76 DEED— ...O N‘St, _-1v58 DEED UMPTIOil ,se565.4 iaoEYm 4 678,8 xnsa 74 .. 573 , 212.00 PLAT 212.36 MEAS. // N86'44'07"W CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT en 3 9 'DECO 75 Ain IX " Q o CONEMIE OF MICE 0.1. NORM OF nIOPERT, ISE 57.3.4 slap der,..1.: 'MO 5-01X Val UTTER? lelosco. 87 8 30 73 TJ 874.4 `5i1 x875.2 41 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 010111071118 OF FENCE 0.0' NomisAsioRLY OF PROPERTY UNE 12-SUllEprior 8va1 x87462 1 _31 CE7RFRlnf OF 0.6' NORMOF PRCRERIY uni C) frl -e. 1 TO 1NER 1 AFS . C. T 1 I- • .,- UTH HA B 1. 0 0 1< 870.0 JOB NO. SCALE 484-20 1" -20' DRAWN CME REFERENCE SHEET 1 of 1 BOOK/PAGE REVISIONS RAW: RENARIOS 28.168 SF 119.95' 226.53' PROPOSED LOT I 15.144 SF 59.91' 250.89' PROPOSED LOT II 13.024 SF 59.96' 215.91' CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 0 100 100 200 SITE ADDRESS 5209 Mirmehohn Blvd. &Um, MN 55424 I hereby certify That thls eurvey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct au/en/Non and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the leen of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. Mum 02.01-2021 WaossowA. Snows, R.L.S. MN REG 16230 W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. ROW CEDAR AVENUE SO, BUCK 222. BLOOMINGTON. MN 136425 INAc WAD 654.4065 FA= WM 654.1288 EMAIL: INFOOWEIROWNLANDEuRvEviNo.cOM 500 SQUARE FOOT STUDY FOR: GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES rKonErnYoWNEEL &Dom= PROPENTYDescarmnoN LC/TANEN LoTwo3TH LoTDEr114 1 S VI 04 K ARONSON 5114 ARDEN AVE. LOT 2 & PAW OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, BRUCE-WOOD 18,512 SF 78' 240' 2 C R & El E SONDEM 5118 ARDEN AVE. LOT 1 & PART OF LOT 5 BLOCK I BRUCE4000 22.010 SF 90' 247' 3 C 14 WALTON & U TASOYA 5111 ARDEN AVE LOT E BLOCK 4, BRUCEW000 11,009 SF 80' 184' 4 El N & P A %MUMS TR 5113 ADEN AVE. LOT 7 BLOCK 4 BRUCE/1000 13 728 SF 70' 100' 5 le U 1,1 6 VIARILING 5115 ARDEN AVE. LOT 8, BLOCK 4, 5RUCE4000 13,699 SF es' 177' 8 B 5 & L A OLSEN IRLISTEES 5117 ARDEN AVE. LOT 9 BLOCK 4, BRUCEWOOD 11,956 SF 100' 148' 7 NANCY E TARBOX 5128 JUNIGA AVE. LOT 8. BLOCK 4. GLIENMEIV ACO. TO EDNA 7,877 SF 75' 105' 8 LAWRENCE L SWARDBY TRUSTEE 5124 JUANITA AVE. LOT 7 BLOCK 4. MENNEN ADD. TO EDNA 7,877 SF 78' 105' 9 KURT E KEVA REV TR 5120 JUANITA AVE. LOT 6, BLOC( 4. GUNMEW ADD. TO EDINA 7.877 SF 75' 105' 10 T C & L J PAULSON 5116 JUANITA AVE. LOT 5, BLOCK 4, GLIDDEN ADD. TO MINA 7,877 SF 73' 105' 11 JOHN C ADAMS 5112 JUANITA AVE. LOT 4 BLOCK 4 CLAIMER ADD. TO EDINA 7 877 SF 75' 105' 12 IURGO 0 KOSUAS 5121 JUANITA AVE. LOT 15. BLOCK 3, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EDINA 7.877 SF 75' 105' 13 'MOWS GOOK 5125 JUANITA AVE. LOT 14, BLOCK 3, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EDNA 8.396 SF 80' 105' 14 MARLIN J WIENER Er AL 5129 JUANITA AVE. LOT 13, BLOCK 3, GLEINIEW ADO. TO EDINA 8,398 SF 80' 105' 15 S II St Il E SANDO TRUSTEES 5133 JUANITA AVE LOT 12. BLOCK 3, GLENMEW ADO. TO EDINA 7,877 SF 75' 105' 18 ROWS DAVIDSON JR 5137 JUANDA AVE. LOT 11 BLOCK 3, OLDIVIEW ADO. TO E01144 7,877 SF 75' 105 17 T J & LI A SEELEY 5136 INDIANOLA AVE LOT 10 BLOCK 3 GLIDDEN ADO. 70 EDINA 7,877 SF 75' 105' 18 L J & J U ANDERSON 5132 INDIANOLA AVE. LOT 9 BLOCK 3, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EDNA 7,877 SF 75' 105' 19 11/00 0 & J U SCHULZ 5128 INIDNOLA AVE. LOT 8 BLOCK 3, GLIENODI ADD. TO Elva 5.396 SF BO' 105' 20 STEVEN & MORA LONDON 5124 1NDIANOIA AVE. LOT 7, BLOCK 3, GLOOMY/ ADO. 70 EDINA 8,395 SF BO' 105' 21 E U LINK & A U INISCH 5120 INDLANOLA AVE. LOT 6 BLOCK 3, GUNMEN ADO. TO EDINA 7,877 SF 75' 105' 22 A L SHIPP & U E MOSCANOREN 5113 INOLYOMA AVE. LOT 13. BLOCK 2, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EMMA 8,092 SF 75' IOW 23 DANEL J YOUNG ET AL 5117 INDLANOIA AVE LOT 12, BLOCK 2, GLENMEW ADO. TO EDINA 8,092 SF 75' 108' 24 SIDER J CHRISTIANSON ET AL 5121 INDIANOLA AVE. LOT II BLOCK 2, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EMMA 5.092 SF 7S' 108' 25 S W & U VI KELLEY 5125 DEILANOU AVE. LOT 10. BLOCK 2, GLENVIEW ADO. TO EDIM 8.092 SF 75' 108' 26 SACHIN R & KELLY 1101E 5129 INDIANOLA AVE. LOT 9 BLOCK 2, GLENVIEW ADD. TO EDNA 8,092 SF 75' 108' 27 RA&NSKASH 5128 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 8 BLOCK 2 GLIEWEIY ADD. TO EDINA 8.092 SF 75' 108' 28 W 6 & L U STRUNG 5124 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 7 BLOCK 2, GLENVIEW A00. TO mau. 8,092 SF 75' 108' 20 U J & LI .1 POKIER II 5120 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 6 BLOCK 2, GLENAEW ADD. TO EDNA 5.092 SF 75' 106' 30 C & A MUJEUTH 5116 HALIFAX AVE LOT 5. BLOCK 2, GLITIMEW ADD. TO EDNA 8,092 SF 75' 108' 31 DAVID E LLAETZOU3 5114 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 4 BLOCK 2 GLENVIEW ADD. TO EDINA 8,092 SF 75' 108. 32 IWIS .1 LOEFFLER ET AL 5125 HALIFAX AVE. PELT OF LOT 60, AUDITOR'S SUDO. NO. 172 6,910 SF DS 135' 33 RICHARD P RADOM 5129 HALIFAX AVE. PART OF LOT 61, AUDITOR'S 5080. ND 172 6,510 SF SW 135' 34 ROW E LICCOIWICK ET AL 5133 HAUFAX AVE PART OF LOT 46 AUODOR'S SUBD. NO. 172 8 110 SF 60' 135' 35 T U & P L FLETCHER 5137 HALIFAX AVE PART OF LOT 46, AUDITOR'S SUBD. ND 172 7.020 SF 52' 135' 36 1.1 0 & A L JOHNSON 51313 GLOWS AVE. PART OF LOT 46, AUDITORS SUBD. NO. 172 7,579 SF 58' 135' 37 FREEBORN R 0LDF1EL0 5200 COMAS AVE PART OF LOT 39. BLOCK 1, SOUTH FORRET PM/ 2140 ADD. 7,020 SF 58' 125' 38 DEVARSHU V KANSARA TRUST 5201 HALIFAX AVE PART OF LOT 39, BLOCK 1 SOLON HARRET mac 2140 ADO. 7,240 SF 59' 150' 39 A F ARTHUR & C S HEDES 5205 HAUFAX AVE LOT 38 BLOCK 1 SOUTH IERRIET PARK 200 ADO. 17,940 SF 60' 299' 40 T R BERGSTROM & 11 L DOWNEY 5209 HALIFAX AVE LOT 37 BLOCK 1 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 21(13 ADO. 17,846 SF 60' 297' 41 U C & 8 II 11COOROUGH 5213 HAUFAX AVE LOT 36, BLOCK 1 SOUTH HARRIET MK 205 ADD. 16,950 SF 57' 294' 42 SIEVE MORGAN 5217 HAUFAX AVE LOT 35 BLOCK 1 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2140 ADO. 17,329 SF 60' 288' 43 JOYCE 0 BREXKE 5221 HAUFAX AVE LOT 34 BLOCK 1 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADD. 16,957 SF 60' 252' 44 0 .4 K WEIR 5223 HALIFAX AVE. NWT OF LOT 33 BLOCK 1 SOUTH KISMET PARK 2140 ADO. 12.934 SF 60' 216' 45 PAUL & KRETI HOOD 5220 14AUFAX AVE PARR OF LOT 32, BLOCK 1 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 210 ADO. 12,138 SF 60' 202' 46 VILLAGE OF EDNA 24 HALIFAX (UNASSIGNED) PART OF LOTS 30 & 31. BLOCK 1. SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2840 ADO. 22,194 SF 120' 185' 47 J R & C /V IORCHNER 5304 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 13, BLOCK 2 SOWN HARRIET PARK 200 ADD. 14,115 SF 60' 235' 48 J T & C II UEENAN TRS 5300 HALIFAX AVE LOT 12, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2N0 ADD. 13,546 SF 60' 226' 49 6 T & C A RUPPERT 5240 HALIFAX AVE. LOT II, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARED PARK 2N0 ADD. 13,127 SF 60' 219' 50 S L & L U DONKE 5230 HAUFAX AVE LOT 10, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADO. 12,587 SF 60 215' 51 0 A & U H FLORES 5232 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 9, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADD. 12,831 SF 60' 214' 52 JOSEPH SILTER REVOCABLE TO 5228 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 5, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK OM ADD. 12,652 SF 60' 214' 53 JS&LSSMADY 5224 HALIFAX AVE LOT 7. BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 7.00 ADD. 12,873 SF 60' 215' 54 JR&JERONER 5220 HALIFAX AVE LOT 8, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2140 ADD. 12.691 SF 60' 215' 55 STEPHAME A VTTT 5215 HAUFAX AVE LOT 5 BLOCK 2 SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2140 ADD. 12,915 SF 60' 215' 55 D W WINGER ET AL TRUSTEES 5212 KILDA% AVE LOT 4, BLOCK 2, SOUTH KIRRET PARK 200 ADO. 12,995 SF 60' 217' 57 N J DIANCEARA & J C ROCHELEAU 5208 HALIFAX AVE LOT 3, BLOCK 2, SOUTH FLARRET PARK 2ND ADM 13,341 SF 60' 223' 58 WRY BALOGH 5204 HAWN( AVE LOT 2, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 250 ADD. 13,941 SF 60' 232' 59 1100ERT C & CERA I. SOUKUP 5200 HALIFAX AVE. LOT 1, MOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADD. 14,063 SF 59' 244' 60 RICHARD & SUSAN E NASH TRUST 4201 52810 ST. Vi LOT I. BLOCK 1, SOWN HARRIET PARK STONER ADD. 10,405 SF 65' 119' 61 GE&KLOTTERLEI 4207 52140 ST. W LOT 2 BLOCK I. SWIRL HARRIET PARK STONER ADD. 9.520 SF Bo' 119' 62 RYAN & PATRICIA ENGLE 5201 019984848 BOO. LOT 3, BLOCK I. SOUTH KARRET PARK OVER ADD. 14.220 SF 50' 235' 83 P C BROSIUS & R STMFA 5205 LONNEHAHA BLVD. LOT 4, BLOCK I, SOUTH HARRIET PARK STONER ADD. 13,821 SF 85' 223' 64 R C & C 13 BE NETT 5217 MIND:WEN BLVD. LOT 38, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 290 ADD. 12,813 SF 60' 211' 65 JOSEPH MIER & WEE 5221 LONNEWHA BLVD. LOT 37, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADD. 12,640 SF 60' 209' 66 RAND( D CARLSON 5225 MINNEKAHA BUD LOT 38, BLOCK 2, scum HARRIET PARK 200 ADO. 12.435 SF 60' 207' 67 KERRY & NOM UCGRYN 5229 169404.440 BLVD. LOT 35 BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2/113 ADO. 12,386 SF ed 207' 68 ALICE D UORTENSON 5233 MINNEHNIA BLVD. AND 24 IAINNEHAM (UNASSIGNED) LOT 34, BLOCK 2. SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2810 ADD. AND PART OF LOT 33, BLOCK 2, SOUTH MARE PNM 2110 ACO. 20,461 SF 96' 214' 69 JOSHUA S HOME 5241 &ORNERY/A BLVD. LOT 32 & PART OF LOT 33 BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADO. 18,243 SF 84' 218' 70 F 0 RINGER JR & K 1.I DIGER 5301 MINNEHAW. BLVD. LOTS 30 & 31, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 200 ADD. 27,433 SF 120' 227' 71 J 0 & K E WHEATON 5109 ARDEN AVE LOT 5 BLOCK 4. MUCCl/300 10,683 SF 60' 177' 72 WARPING HUNK/ & REHM XU 5132 GORGAS AVE PART OF LOT 46. AUDITOR'S SUBS. NO. 172 7.580 SF 5110 135' MEAN 11,609.15 SF 70.38' 169.99' MEDIAN 10,846.00 SF 70.50' 163.50' S209 MINNEHAHA BLVD LOTINEFED LoTAREA LoTWWIN sacnING X 110 4 / PIO ,6 3 PARK STEIN SOUTH NAR 62 ita 52ND ST W 15 16 20 19 18 17 21 z z 231 24i 25' HARRIET 59 58 57 56 ;55 54 f301 29 27 28 31 rr) 32 2ND 1,39 '43 '45 40 /41 42 4 ADDN' 72 st/ (/) CC 0 0 BROWNSTONE Ii PLANNING DEPAM SCALE IN FEET JOB NO. 484-20 SCALE DRAWN 1"-100' REVISIONS DATE MIMEO BOOK/PAGE CME REFERENCE Warr 1 of 1 49893 wr 4-09-2021 Krystle L Bloch I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT' AM A DULY LICENSE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DESIGNED KLB DRAWN KU) CHECKED KLE SITE, GRADING, EC FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SHEET x OF L 0 T 3 8 678.0 " 879. 8878.8 x873.1 X873.2 212.00 PLAT 281321.34 MEA N89'44'07"W 888.7 0 x888.9 x988.9 4 L 0 T L 0 T 2 84.0 888.0 888.0xFA 888. 874. 871.1 8875.1 X878.0 869.4X 873.41/' 877.8 X673.° X782 90' X872. 6' BUILDING SETBACK N89'5 PART OF LOT 41 7"E 261.70 MEAS. CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 SILT FENCE (TYP,) EC/TREE PROTECTION EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: TOTAL LOT (1(342) AREA = 28,168 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS TOTAL = 3,479 SF NOTE: L SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. .671:77.47 CA'ADZA/G,Y ZA70,510/17 CON7:ROZ _r.REA7 _P_A707AC770/V 520.9 BOCZAWAO, 0 FERIZZ PLAN . 20 x873.7 8878.6 874.9 "108 EXCEPTION 8802.0 877.48 8723 X 811Z2. ,... x882.9 8681.7 PARCE MING PAX13-. 7.--------eX 878.13 LOTS 40 6619 X182.2 LOT wit x878.4 BLQ1.4CK --80.5'-- 8' BUILDING SETBACK -----, 8 877.8 881 ............... .....4.72 .,-878 ___, S89'53'17"E 226,53 -1 7 1369.1X .7 889AX X87 875 874.1 1 /4 872.6 L=58 DEED__ 887.8 +00. 7 Oj, 25,0. A., • 00 jkA cD 7 9 7> w t._s: 1„. ,D. z, "I ,„, --75 DEED- V° 8688.6 M 1'37 N 888.68 Fy TOP...888.4 STS .15‘ 6/4 .151114. X887.0 .163g. STELEEEN129.18BK: x8,57 868.88 T.N.H..870.09 965.9 :86Rsrsi5.0. (BEElirvEix 1'888.0 098414,„..4 8887.4 X887.9/ POI OF BEGINNING: PARCEL 2 UCEPTION ita.' 887. \ 10 N13'45'19"W 8.00 PLAT 7.80 MEAS. 870.38 8888,1 888.8 X868.4 BUILfJNG SETBACK .94 4 7 6 0.2% !1 0 V1.6 8887,3 873.0 11868.9 1 74,5 876.2 8 BUILDING SETBACK • X372.6 X 69.7 05.9 --262 DEED- -''883.0"84.1 878.1.1.L. -%834.1 X870.0 PARCEL L 0 T LOT 78.5 ...... 8877.3 X7 UNE OF LOT 41 080.5 1 79.5C- 871 INT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3, • 0 NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 pRok m TREE \ PRESERVADON EASEIEr X879.8 ..••••••• 879. 8878.3,i PLANNING DE. PAIi 87 X71.1 LEGEND . . . . FIRE HYDRANT . . . . WATER VALVE . . . . MANHOLE . . . CATCH BASIN . . . . POWERPOLE . . . . LIGHT POLE . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET . EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES SILT FENCE / TREE PROTECTION FENCE FLOW ARROW * PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION: First floor elevation of new construction not to exceed more than 1.0' higher than existing first floor elevation of 876.8. EXISTING ELEVATIONS: First Floor = 876.8 Tuck Under Garage = 868.0 8867.4 887.68 22 WU. 8 1.91W 870.31W 873.o x/ „2,7 GARAGE FLOOR-873.8 --102.5'-- 8873.9 eAD '875.1 X 071.9 L 0 T 1 NORTH LINE OF LOT 40, SOUTH UNE OF LOT 41 PARCEL 3 3 1 9 /I 2 X 878.1 X8788 ANEE X878.5 X ti) 8.18 875.1 X1375.2q 874, X874.8, rrl REV. NO. DATE BY CNK DESCRIPTION 0 15 30 SCALE FEET 1"= 30' B BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC blochenglneorIng.com 32210 %EON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 507-995-2981 krye lleObloch a n9Inear1ng .co m H ENGINEERING 517:g .RNID GYA2.,4_,OZN-C .,_5700771 il'ARRIA7 PARK. S7271../1/72.7R #2.41...0 LEGEND A.B.D.17.10.4i k872.8 +00. 4/6 ooqi , . . . . FIRE HYDRANT c5 / 0.- 7 U9' 'ii2 c-',.., `P 7), S' . . . . WATER VALVE • 7 4ti • ''' 40,ss.S LOT 4 : • 0 x 686.9 x866.9 888.7 '44 •880.6 .10.7' I LOT 2 X873.7 X876.5 874.9 , , , N89.5. LOT 1 NORTH UNE OF LOT 40, SOUTH UNE OF LOT 41 PARCEL 3 PART OF LOT 411 7"E 261.70 MEAS. 20 UNE OF LOT 41 \ . . . . MANHOLE --75 DEED-- 0 ••.... • ,---10e. .,., 870.6% 262 DEED- •'• 10- •• • 11 8.09.8i. 674.5 X876.2 UNE POINT OF BE6NNING PARCEL , 889.70.' L =58 DEED __ EXCEPTION ,?•844...... X867.4 S. . . . . CATCH BASIN 6,31.0 POI OF BEGINNING: ....... X 6117y Xv..1 ... l• • PARCEL 2 EXCEPTION ........ 688.4 ••••. / . . . . POWERPOLE sleek X887.0 x888.0 ***C.,„ts, . . . . LIGHT POLE icr x687,4 •cii 686.8% *., "... aaa.oNS 007.8 4 & ii ".......... 6'BUILDING SETBACK -80.5 -- 877.4x ¨ 878'.<3 x878.5 PARCE- G>SapA24/ "all ULM L 0 T ..."'-'----"---eX 878.0 xip.3.2 x884.1 X682.0 X8132.8 rs."-----... A ......... NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40, • 0 \ SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 41 'PRAM TREE PRESERVATION EASEMENT -A l ‘ 870.• -. 8879.9 - ..... . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND 7 887.6x 870,2% RI3V.5 BITE-ETENCL911861 x "7 i T.N.H..870.09 • 868.7X o A.._ • .. IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET 86546M-MPEEHm) -7<ks,• 171.6 X2.2 LOT ' -1181.9 .'"? NVROP 4 m ir ..- ...I 'NI, ..../ I X678.' 0 , i 0 ' ... ... 9,4 -..., c.- - , Tetwo 4873.0 . , . . EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Vx 870-3X X666.6 • , X 72.! 8.8 'A N% X868.1 ...-:' X 878•4 BLQCK 1.4 • :. • 6 ..,. DRIVEWAY 10 • I an • •••• .33 -i•d t .... DENOTES SILT FENCE / TREE PROTECTION FENCE t \ ., --80.5.-- 6' 6UILD910 SEIBACK ---",.. • Aih.• 879 __...--.) 1,3 1 %WA 858.0X ie % C'D 5 " en. 881 .... - 878 ---' FLOW ARROW NN srs am 4),. • 'Os S89'53.17"E 226.53 1DP,-8438.4 49. - ""--.- 8 DUI NS SETBACKX87" -10275 1 4,.,=b-a--------7T7Tril ... • .., tn.oc. x 8.9 1.0 • 6 . • 857.1 X868.4 XI 87.k : , PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL 4z-s, i _ ,,,,.. 0 41) 87.0T0 % •••,.. a 089.1X • N,... ....... .00t- p . .0.V.- . EE X877.3 , GI i 1 W 878,5 87R.1 4., ../ X876.5 0 PARCEL r N. x8788 CO % 87.7 . X875.1 & Z < " 687. 867.3 sr 659.0X X72..8 X1373.0 L 0 T 319 X8r8 u-) &ix 878.1% 2.... 070 2 1 g / BAI81,7.-5- .... - LOT -/ 2 ......, .....,........__---BUILDING 807.1TC (..) . 773 6 X871.9 X875.1 %,) 83.8 X 674..1 X07.8 8 .3 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION: t f ............... a x .7 X8754 Xff7" X75.2 867 10 • - . • ...2. AMWAY \ N13'45.19"W • 871.1 X 11111141/60 First floor elevation of new construction not to exceed 90 6. BUILDING SETBACK 1 8874.1 , more than 1.0' higher than existing first floor elevation 8.00 PLAT -4111110Rmil irwifiramialErmimzill \ '44.1. ' 7.80 MEAS. ..----- 874. X874.8c. of 876.8. 666.6 8887.3 . DT* X87 X873.1 x873.2 212.00 PLAT 21 MEAS. 87 867.2TC 889.4% 870.31* EXISTING ELEVATIONS: .34 t•-•-) 37 ''%?Y //NE39.4.4-'07 "W 0 First Floor = 876.8 37 Tuck Under Garage = 868.0 673.0X/ IMPERVIOUS CALCULATIONS (LOT 1): c--- r %16217 LOT 38 rri GARAGE F1OOR873.6 --4... TOTAL LOT 1 AREA = 15,144 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS = 3,001 SF = 20% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS = 6,316 = 42% INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS = 22% CITY OF EDINA NO NEW IMPERVIOUS DIRECTED TO PRIVATE PROPERTIES. 1. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DRAINAGE DIRECTED TO STREET OR ALLEY. 1111 DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT REV_ 910. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER DESIGNED ELDEN ENGINEERING, PLLC SHEET MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KLB brochengInotrIng.corn SITE, GRADING, EC FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD ci 0 15 30 ... ... DRAWN B ' .41.0 -1 m •• m NIB 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, /AN 55008 OF SCALE FEET CHECKED ENGINEERING 507-995-2961 1° = 30' ,,,‘„,, Krystle L. Bloch t,,,, 49893 ,,,,-. 4-09-2021 KW kryotleOblochengIneerInp.com EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 57701?/117 I /WA' POLL Ur/0/V P_WEN710/1/ PL4i1/- (7,5W7PPP/i SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. Implement sediment control practices in order to minimize sediment from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm drain inlets. 2. Install all temporary or permanent sediment control measures including silt fence at perimeter of construction, rock construction entrances, sediment filters, silt socks, and sedimentation basins prior to beginning site clearing, grading, or other land-disturbing activity. 3. Establish sediment control practices on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even= if the short-term activity is not complete. 4. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 5. If the down gradient treatment system becomes overloaded, install additional up gradient sediment control practices or redundant BMPs in order to eliminate the overloading. 6. Before beginning construction, install a TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE at each point where vehicles exit the construction site. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2inch) diameter rock, MNDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2. CA-3. Or equal Coarse Aggregate. Place the aggregate in a layer at least 152 mm (6 inches) thick across the entire width of the entrance. Extend the rock entrance at least 15 m (50 feet) into the construction zone. Use MNDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material beneath the aggregate in order to prevent migration of soil into the rock from below. Maintain the entrance in a condition that will prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto paved roadways. Provide periodic top dressing with additional stone as required. Close entrances protected by temporary rock construction entrances to all construction traffic. 7. If necessary, clean the wheels of construction vehicles in order to remove soils before the vehicles leave the construction site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains into an approved sediment trapping device. 8. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall be on a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep. If necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposal area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 9. Soil Stockpiles: Install silt fence or other effective sediment controls around all temporary soil stockpiles. Locate soil or dirt stockpiles such that downslope drainage length is no less than 8 m (25 feet) from the toe of the pile to a surface water, including Stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits sand ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the Stormwater. If remaining for more than 7 days, stabilize the stockpiles by mulching, vegetative cover, tarps, or other means. During street repair, cover construction soil or dirt stockpiles located closer than 8 m (25 feet) to a roadway or drainage channel with tarps, and protect storm sewer inlets with silt socks or staked silt fence. 10. Silt Fence: Install silt fence along the contour (on a level horizontal plane) with the ends turned up (1-hooks) in order to help pond water behind the fence. Install the silt fence on the uphill side of the support posts. Provide a post spacing of 1.2 m (4 feet) or less. Drive posts at least 0.6 m (2 feet) into the ground. Anchor the silt fence fabric in a trench at least 152 mm (6 inches) deep and 152 mm (6 inches) wide dug on the upslope side of the support posts. Lay the fabric in the trench and then backfill and compact with a vibratory plate compactor. Make any splices in the fabric at a fence post. At splices, overlap the fabric at least 152 mm (6 inches), fold it over, and securely fasten it to the fencepost. Silt fence supporting posts shall be 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb. per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet). Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage. Geotextile fabric shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, furnished in a continuous roll in order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform in texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 11. Maintain all temporary erosion and sediment control devices in place until the contributing drainage area has been stabilized (hard-surfaced areas paved and vegetation established in a greenspace). Repair any rilling, gully formation, or washouts. After final establishment of permanent stabilization, remove all temporary synthetic, structural, and nonbiodegradable erosion and sediment control devices and any accumulated sediments. Dispose of off-site. Restore permanent sedimentation basins to their design condition immediately following stabilization of the site. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 1. Inspect the entire construction site at least once every 7 days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in a 24-hour period. Following an inspection that occurs within 24 hours after a rainfall event, the next inspection must be conducted within 7 days after that rainfall event. 2. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, infiltration areas, and stabilized areas. 3. Record all inspections and maintenance conducted during construction in writing and keep these records, The inspections and maintenance records must include date and time of inspections, date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 0.5 inches In a 240hour period, name of person(s) conducting inspections, findings of inspections, recommendations for corrective actions, and any corrective actions taken. 4. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs in order to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Repair, replace, or supplement any nonfunctional BMPs with functional BMPs within 24 hours after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access unless another time frame is specified. 5. Remove accumulated sediment deposits from behind erosion and sediment control devices as needed. Do not allow sediment to accumulate to a depth of more than one-third of the height of the erosion and sediment control devices. Repair, replace, or supplement deteriorated, damaged, rotted, or missing erosion control devices within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 6. Repair, replace, or supplement all silt fences when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 7. Clean sedimentation basins, storm sewer catch basins, ditches, and other drainage facilities as required in order to maintain their effectiveness. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and they sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1 of the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 8. Inspect surface waters (including drainage ditches and conveyance systems) evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. Remove all deltas and sediment deposited. Stabilize areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must be completed within 7 days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints. If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of obtaining access. 9. Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall be on a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep. If necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposal area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 10. Perform any corrective measures ordered by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. Install any additional erosion protection or sediment control measures deemed necessary by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. POLLUTION PREVEINTION MEASURES: 1. Solid Waste: Dispose of collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris, and other waste properly off-site in compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. 2. Hazardous Materials: Properly store oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances In order to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Include secondary containment. Restrict access to storage areas in order to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous materials must be in compliance with MPCA regulations. 3. Other Materials: Dispose of unused building materials, garbage, trash, cleaning wastes, toxic materials, and wastewater properly off-site and in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements. 4. Furnish suitable trash containers and regularly remove the accumulated trash from the premises. 5. Do not allow solid waste, hazardous materials, and other materials to be carried by runoff into a receiving water or storm sewer system. 6. Limit external washing of trucks and other construction vehicles to a defined area of the site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains into an approved sediment trapping device. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing Is prohibited. 7. Concrete Washout Operations: Contain all liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations in a leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. Do not allow the liquid and solid wastes to contact the ground. Prevent runoff from the concrete washout operations or areas. Dispose of liquid and solid wastes properly in compliance with MPCA regulations. Install a sign adjacent to each washout facility in order to inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. 8. Sanitary and Septic Waste: Furnish and install detached portable toilet facilities at the construction site. The portable toilets shall be conveniently located for the use of all workers on the project. Maintain the facilities in a clean, dry, sanitary condition in accordance with MN Dept of Health requirements. SOIL STABILIZATION: 1. Water and maintain seeded or sodded areas on a timely day-to-day basis. In the event of a seeding failure, reseed and remulch the areas where the original seed has failed to grow and perform additional watering as necessary at no additional cost to the Owner. Promptly replace all sod that dries out to the point where it is presumed dead and all sod that has been damaged, displaced, weakened, or heavily infested with weeds at no additional cost to the Owner. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc) on the development site before work begins. 2. Avoid removal of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest practical area of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. 3. Following initial soil disturbance or redisturbance, complete permanent or temporary stabilization against erosion due to rain, wind, and running water as soon as possible, but in no case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including Stormwater management pond sideslopes. This requirement does not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on which grading, site building, or other construction activities are actively underway. 4. Provide temporary grass seed cover on all topsoil stockpiles and other areas of stockpiled excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged periods of open, bare earth without grass cover will not be permitted. Stabilize all disturbed greeenspace areas with a minimum of 4" topsoil immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and mulch, or sod and stake these areas within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be paved using early application of gravel base. 6. Apply necessary moisture to the construction area in order to prevent the spread of dust. MATERIALS: 1. Storm Sewer Inlet Protection: The following are approved inlet sediment control devices: a. Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 23 (fits rough opening for 2'x3' inlet), Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 27 (fits rough opening for 27" inlet), Or Road Drain Top Slab Model CG 3067 (fits Neena Casting with 35-1/4" x 17-3/4" dimensions) manufactured by WMCO, 799 Theis Drive, Shakopee, MN, 55379, Phone (952) 233-3055. b. Silt Sock: Regular flow (40 gal/min/sq. ft.) Average width strength equal to 165.0 lbs/in, ASTM 0-4884. Rectangular siltsock on rectangular inlets. Round siltsock on round inlets. Use ACF Environmental, Inc., 2831 cardwell Road, Richmond, VA 23234, Phone (800) 448-3636, or approved equal. c. InfraSafe Sediment Control Barrier. Install geotextile sock on the outside of the barrier in order to trap additional fines. Standard frames are available to fit 24" to 30" diameter and 2'x3' openings. Distributed by ROYAL ENTERPRISES AMERICA, 30622 Forest Boulevard, Stacy, MN 55079, Phone (651) 462-2130. 2. Topsoil: Topsoil used for finish grading of areas to be turfed or planted shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specifications 3877 for topsoil borrow modified to contain no more than 35% sand. Topsoil shall be reasonably free of subsoil, heavy clay, coarse sand, stones, and other objects over 51 mm (2 inches) in diameter, and without plants, roots, sticks, and other objectionable material. 3. Geotextile Fabric for Subgrade Stabilization (if required): MnDOT Standard Specification 373 Type V permeable geotextile material. 4. Supporting Posts for Silt fence: 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet). Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage. 5. Silt Fence Fabric: MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, furnished in a continuous roll in order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform in texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 6. Aggregate For Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 7. Geotextile Fabric for Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: MnDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material. 8. Aggregate for Block and Rock Sediment Filter: 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 9. Block and Rock Inlet Filters: Block and Rock Inlet Filters consist of open-core concrete masonry blocks, wire screen with 12 mm (0.5 Inch) openings, ;ITY OF EDINA, and washed rock. Place open-core concrete masonry blocks lengthwise on their sides around the catchbasin inlet. Place wire screen around the perimeter to the top of the block barrier before the rock Is placed. The screen prevents the rocks from being washed through blocks. Place rock against wire mesh to top of blocks. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 APR 0 9 20?1 Coarse Aggregate or equal. Install two courses of 8" block to form a barrier height of 16". 10. Biodegradable Erosion Control Blankets: In accordance with MnDOT Standard Specifications 3885. 11. Erosion Control Matting: LandLok TRM 450 Turf Reinforcement Mat manufactured by Propex, Inc. (www.geotextile.com <http://www.geotextile.com>), or approved equal soil erosion control matting. HLANNING DEPARTV 12. Staples: Staples used to anchor erosion control blankets shall be U-shaped, 3mm diameter of heavier steel wire. The span width at the crown shall be a minimum of 25 mm (1 inch). Staples shall have a length of 250 mm (10 inches) or more from the top to bottom after bending. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE DESIGNED KLB LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN KLB CHECKED KLB Kyystle L Bloch Lo 49893 3-25-2021 SWPPP FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SHEET C2 OF REV. NO B BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC bkrchanglnearIng.com 32210 XEON Sr NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55005 507-995-2981 kryalleabIochenglneering.com H ENGINEERING BLOCH ENGINEERING, PLLC bIocheng/neorIng.com 32210 XEON ST NW CAMBRIDGE, MN 55008 507-905-2081 krys0e0bIochengIneeNng.corn C3 OF REV. NO. DATE BY CHK DESCRIPTION I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DY ME OR UNDER DESIGNED MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I API A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KLA DRAWN KLD CHECKED FAKE Krystle L Moth 49893 EON 3-25-2021 KLA ENGINEERING SWPPP DETAILS FOR 5209 MINNEHAHA BLVD EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN spoRdi-Km.w POLLUTION PA WMA7.71/0/1/ PLAN (SY K_P_P_P P ck° ,.., t.13" ' I ill 5 N. N 4 • ii 11 ARM ,:41,/,/•• iPPIV IP -*IV* I'l 8' MIN. 11° 10 1-1/2' TO WASHED ROCK 1111.....61.010.410.4111110. i .1.101 1111 I I•telitil I►I P. , . WI AV • n0***010.1111016.4116. 111016•111411101101101114111161111w ••••••••••111 b.. 41011010. 111111". ek) Ogle" ••.4 \IPA 41 e • P ' ••.toieres• triol• - • .. . i 04 02111_11 0 Ill A • , `IN. 2-1/2' \G '461411$re AN ADDITIONAL IS WRAPPED AROUND 2'X4' AND STAPLED GEOTEXTILE SIZE 8' HIM GREATER SIDES OF THE PLACE GEOTEXTILE INLET COVER. 0 ALL MEET 18' OF GEOTEXTILE THE WOOD L L I- SHALL BE ON ALL INLET COVER. UNDER GEOTEXTILE USED SPEC. 3886 FOR ...., L -...,, L LL L FOR MACHINE TYPE C I /1_1_. WOOD %., <:1 > LLL INLET PROTECTION SLICED SPEC, 3891 GRATE . L SILT 2•X4' WIDTH DN :,,, SHALL FENCE EXTENDED BOTH SIDES,YOND PLASTIC ZIP TIES (5 LB. TENSILE) LOCATED IN TOP 8" DIRECTION EIF RUNOFF LL 8' BE 1 POST LENGTH, 5 FT. E E MIN. AT 6 FT. MAX. SPACING E II ll GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, 36' WIDTH I —. H-3' LEVEL OAIN.) 4' OVERLAP ,/AIIWII/P"- ANCHOR SI OT N TIFRNATIVF / / -----1101----"'N 1' SPACING ON STAPLES DESIGN GUIDELINES! MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING AREA. I'' I MACHINE 12" DEPTH fr FLAP 3 ACRES 10 T- ) SLICE k 8" - ( PLUS / '41111111111fr L---.FOLD UNDER 6" EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TYPE C INLET PROTECTION STANDARD MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5209 Minnehaha Blvd Tree Survey and Plan Tree Diameter/Heigh Protect (P) Within 10' of build pad/utility or 5' of driveway/right Tree fl Species t Tree Health Remove (R) of way? 1 Maple 10" Good P N 2 Maple 10" Good P N 3 Maple 10" Good P N 4 Maple 14" Good P N 5 Pine 6' Good P N 6 Pine 6' Poor P Y Trim 7 Pine 22' Fair P N Trim 8 Deciduous 8" Good R If 9 Deciduous 10" Good P V 10 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 11 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 12 Deciduous 10" Good P Y 13 Deciduous 16" Good P V 14 Deciduous 8,, Good P N 15 Deciduous 20" Good P Y 16 Maple 16" Good P Y 17 Maple 16" Good P Y 18 Pine 28' Good P Y 19 Oak 16" Good P V 20 Deciduous 8,, Good P N 21 Deciduous 8,, Poor R N 22 Oak 20" Good It Y 23 Oak 10" Good R Y 24 Oak 32" Fair rt V 25 Deciduous 10" Good R V 26 Elm 26" Good P Y 27 Deciduous 14" Poor R V 28 Deciduous 32' Good P N 29 Butternut 20" Good P N 30 Oak 18" Good P N 31 Oak 12" Good It Y 32 Oak 12" Good R Y 33 Deciduous 10" Good a Y 34 Deciduous 8,, Good P Y 35 Butternut 16" Good P N 36 Deciduous 8,, Good P N 37 Deciduous 8,, Good P N 38 Deciduous 8,, Good P N 39 Butternut 10" Good P N 40 Butternut 12" Good P Y 41 Butternut 12" Good P Y 42 Deciduous 28" Good R V 43 Elm 20" Good R Y 44 Deciduous 16" Good P Y 45 Oak 24" Good P N 46 Deciduous 10" Good P N 47 Oak 12" Good P Y 48 Oak 12" Good P Y 49 Deciduous 10" Good R Y CITY OF EDINA 50 Deciduous 16" Good R Y 51 Deciduous 16" Poor R Y 52 Deciduous 8" Poor It Y APR 0 9 2021 53 Deciduous 24" Poor R Y 54 Oak 24" Poor R Y 55 Deciduous 18" Good P N PLANNING DEPARTiv1;.-AT 56 Deciduous 18" Good P N Total Trees Protect Remove 56 38 18 -r L I I A r• tn. Li r\ •1 /4.-/ I c., 4. 874. E3 L. A r‘ 1' I, 1\ 10-MAPLEr•-• ,.............-.- n-- • -4,4:-.-d -- .-.... e, / .6E19...ix x 861.3 +867'i pope CF LIEG,NC;ING: -41 ' oARC.E1. 2 LYCEPTIM • 4., 80,4 ""1..... J .86F.0 x 8t-• 7.0 f,1. Cit' 8665 ',••• %.11.C' 4.5.. .:';',1t,..Eit,A:Wi1ckt8k,; .4 $61 1 .., . 86.64,m STS C.S. (13EcIT1/6i•K r,9,i1....870.05.. ' ' ' ,• 1/4•••:.."..:; ,.. ..,,,,..'727-.--.....„,,,,. - • ' VRILimE561).9 - -) .., t 866,0 .-,,,--*„..,....o......„.. .....,, -.'''''.:""-'`-Z-;,,,,•••,,,:xt 66.91',1..1,...„:.1..... , '''"-....,,,......,,,. •,.. / -... ji s4;,/, R66.C., tug st / ,...-'•-*.i .F , ck., 4.0...`,,,, ,4'./.;'' / • i --,..„ lo,,.866.47 ''''‘,..N • N 3.1p, / -" ry 4 s'es.,, :-„,,,,,,,., \ .. ;•< 866 6 ) ...,-;. ‘.i'' • .k‘'.1-•••‘..,>.'-' -....‹) e '''''. st.c. C.°, N's, „s•-..,. 'Ns\ 1.0 -/e 870.0 ..1-•117r.1.1 +On t.0. • 0 J.. -Yss 4E) x 88 6,0 • • -1 3 1'-I *86a.9 I em 'i t.. kJ t S 0 U A r 1 r-% ._ . .,:<ts.,.: , ___..„51i__,1 ... . • _......4......:_..21___. • ......4 .• .E.... 4.0,.1 x8 .41 7; 7:11... 2 _ „.„.__,,..,,,,,,,, „....,.. ' , . • 4-1,1APV.1.., • • 721,111. _ 870.6( - x ••• .,,,,•, . .......... ..- ••• ...Me r...._. wrarbioirr8:5---::-872;t2 D(:0.--5---- ---4,6,,,,tovo, 8 AlE -v-C(' i 8NPOS, 1... ' 868,0 i •,..' t.--.,.• ! 877.4x . \ 876 x 873.7 ix x876.5 PARCEL / --, PART OF LOT 41-, N89'5 .07"E AI .70 MEAS. 1 4 -'1:tIlletrw -1-kt765-..jir" t 4 Re to"c, co. t 0' DECO . Ipenrcio: ,,,,,LP-,s p 1 10 OAK +882,8 ti , a NORTH LINE OF LOT 40, SOUTH LINE OF LOT 41 CITY OF EDINA APR 0 9 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT CENTERLINE OF FENCE CORNER 0.1' NORTH OF PROPERTY LINE EAST LINE OF LOT 41 X 879.81 870.6 k ▪ --POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL 3. NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 40. SOUTHEAST cortIrR or LOT 41 • 0 T1-1 HP, BE kit, 4t1c.°14 ‘5* %808.0 8417,5X (17.4 1 45.971 6 ' t% • k 873.0 870.?x *-/-I I x1172.5 x868.1 j c4•• • • 8-DECID. 2VoAK 1 /4 x 878.4 S89'53'1 7"E Z26.53 PARC est.z 01.4 mlitc +881.3 32"OECID 4 (1 i, 2104 o`Dgot) 1°,'"" 2 PROPOSED Oftivi,WAY 04 - -1-2(761tA▪ PLk.. -28"115 ?c+x+43 L PROP IREE 30.PRESERVATION EASEMENT -16'0AX /1-r•--..,„ frDECIDA *879.9 1 867.11C 887.21 60'BUTIERNUT • x 09.7 8 7.3 1.2 ; PROPCi ED DRIVEWAY Vie 1 .2” i3s6.8 X 887.3 868,4 \ ••••- "713UILOW SETBACK - - 8v.1 ' x876.1 AK , 4.• X 875.0 % "sa. tat .sj‘ ePrt• 9.0X • 28.Dlictty ft,-BUILDING §75.1 869.4x 870.3TW,•.. CENTERUNE OF EVICE 0,1' NORTH OF PROPERTY L,NE IVOECIR • 90' 3"DE31?" / 873.4 VII 164.___›-DECIO. 16''DECID. k 2crOAK1 4k87 0 ' 41 i „. *876 2 _ ‘,..,.. - .. - • • - 4:D.:±EC'D Srr .--fi. tiVatic' DEE06.0C •- • . _,.... - ..-- ,,875.6 x 873,0 col x 673.1 ''' 21 2.00 PLAT x287132. .34 MEAS. - e 13715jU PARCEL --r1 (rD *8745 LOT 1 C1 X VOLCIEL;.. *874 9 16.ERITTERNUT *876.5 10.11UTTERNUt X 673.2 -23 tot natinERNur 20 1-3 3 CENT RUNE OF FENCE 0.6' \ NORTH OF PROPERTY LINE X 875.2q \ CENTERLINE OF FENCt `."NORTHEASTERLY OF P X 874.8i 1\ 867.07C0 867.3 867./ 10 8‘ \N13'45119"W' 8.00 PLATrr, 7.80 MEAS. 873.0x7--/- e % ' A R l< t L $ CENTERLINE OF FENCE CORNER 0.6' SOUTH Of PROPERTY LINE 21_ fies.oxFII 1870,2x History of Similar Requests EdinaMN.gov 1 2&6 3 4 7&9 8 5 1 Approved 10 11 12 15 14History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50- foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. 14. In 2019, 4625 Lexington was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,306 square feet to 8,106 and 8,128 square feet. (Median area - 9,306 square feet, median lot depth - 135 feet, and the median lot width 68 feet) 15. In 2020, 5928 Ashcroft was denied a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,813 and 6,790 square feet. (Median area – 8,841 s.f., median lot depth – 135 and median width was 66 feet.) 16 16. In 2020, 5928 Abbott Avenue was approved for a two-lot subdivision with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, lot area variance from 9,000 square feet to 6,391 and 6,331 square feet, and lot depth variances from 135 feet to 127 feet for both lots. (Median lot area -6,745 square feet, median lot depth -129.9 feet, and the median lot width -50 feet.) Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS | © WSB & Asso ciates 2013 , © WSB & Associate s2013 Site Locat ion May 7, 20 21 1 in = 376 f t / Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS | © WSB & Asso ciates 2013 , © WSB & Associate s2013 Site Locat ion Lege nd Addresses May 7, 20 21 1 in = 188 f t / Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 Site Locat ion Lege nd Addresses May 7, 20 21 1 in = 188 f t / Date: May 12, 2021 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:S ketch P lan R eview - 4911 77th S treet Wes t Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. P rovide the applicant non-binding feedback on a potential future development project. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he P lanning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop 4911 77th S treet West, which is part of the P entagon P ark South P U D that was approved in 2019. T he applicant, S olomon R eal Estate and Rise Development, is proposing to develop the vacant L ot in the southeast corner of the P entagon South development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Memo Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans Approved Overall PUD Plan Approved PUD Site Plan - Phase 1 2019 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: May 12, 2021 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 4911 77th Street West The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop 4911 77th Street West, which is part of the Pentagon Park South PUD that was approved in 2019. The applicant, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, is proposing to develop the vacant Lot in the southeast corner of the Pentagon South development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. The overall development site in the PUD is 12.5 acres. The uses approved within the PUD include retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; and phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. (See approved Overall PUD Plans.) The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5-story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. The request would require the following: 1. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans for this site within the existing PUD District. The PUD Zoning is also used to ensure affordable housing on the site. The table on the following page demonstrates how the proposed new building(s) would comply with the existing PUD standards on the lot. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table Issues/considerations: Density. The site is 12.5 acres. This would be the only housing within the development; therefore, the density is 16 units per acre. The applicant is agreeable to meeting the affordable housing policy. Proposed Use. The proposed project introduces housing into the area; housing could begin to activate the area after 5 pm when the offices close and could assist the retail. Housing would be a good fit for this existing PUD. Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Proposed heights. The proposed height of 5-6 stories is within the maximum requirement of 12 stories. Pedestrian connection to the park. Final development plans should include a more prominent connection to Fred Richards Park from 77th Street. Consideration should be given to improved pedestrian connections from Viking Drive into the development on the west side of the PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet NA 15 feet NA 10 feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district 6 stories and 68 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% 1.5% City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 apartments. This was a big issue with approval of the hotel. (Note the sidewalks on the west side of the hotel in the approved plans for 2019. Sustainability. The applicant will be asked to submit the sustainability questionnaire as part of a formal application. Consider a green roof installation to reduce the impacts of the urban heat island and improve energy efficiency. Consider including EV-ready parking stalls, and at least 5% parking stalls with EV chargers. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Sketch Plan Application Narrative For the Pentagon Village Apartments on Lot 3 Pentagon Village Master Planned Community : Pentagon Village is a mixed -use community located at the southeast intersection of Highway 100 and West 77th Street. The approximate 12.5-acre property has been improved with new infrastructure, including the Plaza at Pentagon Village as well as the initial phase of the parking ramp containing 423 - stalls. There are five lots within the project for vertical deve lopment. These lots were approved with the following uses as part of the approved PUD for the Pentagon Village master plan: • Lot 1 Two retail buildings containing approximately 12,020 square feet of space. • Lot 2 A five-story, 235-room dual branded Marriot Hotel. • Lot 3 A five story, 153-room extended stay hotel concept . • Lot 4 A mixed -use retail/office building containing approximately 20,000 square feet. • Lot 5 An office building containing approximately 160,000 square feet. Pentagon Village is intended to be a densely populated master plan which promotes internal connectivity to buildings within the site, as well as , to connect to the uses and amenities of the surrounding community . The Pentagon Village master plan anticipated a variety of uses including multi-story of fices, hotels , multi-family housing, retail, restaurants and parking structures to support such uses . The Pentagon Village master plan was designed and guided by a combination of market -driven demand elements , the six Guiding Principles approved in 2014, and the city’s France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles . Give-to-Get; Plan & Process Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district p rinciples. The Pentagon Village moves beyond the Guiding Principles by providing a significant visual amenity along Highway 100 and the West 77th Street corrido r. With its density of buildings, mix of uses , and strong architectural presence, Pentagon Village will become a gateway into the City of Edina as its development gets completed . The West 77th Street corridor is anchored by Pentagon Village as a multi- use destination connected by several modes of trav el including pedestrian, bicycle, bus, and automobile which will enhance connectivity throughout the surrounding community . Pentagon Village recognizes the advantage of connecting to the community with a prominent main entry and pedestrian connection to the future Fred Richards Park and Nine Mile Regional Trail system across West 77th Street. The inclusion of internal open space and visually p rominent green spaces and hardscape associated with the Pentagon Village Plaza enhance the pedestrian patterns and provide an attractive opportunity for the buildings and uses on this site to be accessible to the surrounding community. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 2 Pentagon Village will promote energy and excitement at this gateway location into the City of Edina and will increase value and opportunity to the surrounding properties and community while encourag ing future redevelopment activity along the West 77th Street corridor. Edina Cultural Preferences Identity Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. The site design and b uilding placement has been oriented to provide appealing views into the site and to all building front doors . The Pentagon Village Plaza and its various art installations are thought fully organized to enhance views into the site from West 77 th Street and surrounding properties. Building corners and entries have been designed to incorporate major architectural features facing key vantage points. The buildings will incorporate design schemes that reflect elements that are inspired by the cultural context of Minnesota. Contemporary design elements will include timeless materials including natural and architectural precast stone, glass and metal panels. All building front entries are oriented to the Pentagon Village Plaza. This helps visitors visually orient themselves to their destination and provides a sense of security through pedestrian visibility . The public green open areas surrounding the Plaza are intended to be an amenity to the buildings located next to them. Building occupants can activate these spaces and be engaged with others. The relationship to open spaces beyond the property lines will keep this location a ctive and visible within the community . By providing new us es and strong amenities , Pentagon Village enhances economic viability, job c reation, and an increased tax base for the City of Edina. The multiple uses of the Pentagon Village development plan including office, hotels , housing and restaurants are intended to provide economic activity throughout most day and evening hours. Comprehensive Connections; Movement Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district. Each building within Pentagon Village has a more intimate green space area that connects and weaves into the larger site green spaces infrastructure . The Pentagon Village master plan organizes open green spaces so that they are separate but connected. Each green space is framed by buildings and their main entrances but can also be accessed by walkways from other parts of the site internally , as well as , from the surrounding community. Sidewalks and bike connections from the community are continued into the site along the green spaces and along the building entries. Parking structure vertical circulation is intended to be located on these sidewalk connections. The design intention is to allow pedestrian circulation between all buildings on the site with obvious and clear paths , allowing activity and security. Connection to the bicycle paths within the community are accommodated at the main entry points. By providing parking structures for the majority of auto use, the interior streets can be safely co -used for pedestrian and bicycle traffic. All pedestrian sidewalks on site are clearly visible and separated from auto and bicycle traffic patterns. The proposed open and green spaces incorporate seating areas and other amenities for pedestrian enjoyment. Wayfinding will help orientate visitors onsite and provide information for community -wide connection opportunities. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 3 Site Design; Transitions Encourage parcel -appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationship without “leftover” spaces on sites. The Pentagon Village master plan includes a variety of multi -story buildings intended to support and enhance the existing building density within the immediate surrounding community . Providing height and shared parking over a typical suburban scale development provides for efficient use of built space and greater opportunities for green space, for an overall design supportive of the Guiding Principles and Southdale Area Working Princip les. The design of the site and buildings incorporate strong views from H ighway 100 with a more expressive architectural design and potential greater building scale. Buildings, parking structures and view corridors are organized around green and open spaces. Entries to buildings and site circulation is clearly visible from these open spaces. Sight lines are controlled with landscape elements while stil l allowing views into the property. It is intended that building architecture is highlighted at strategic corners along sight lines into the property from the district. The retail buildings located along West 77 th Street provide easy access to pedestrian and auto traffic. These retail parcels have been oriented to visually anchor and frame the main entry and accommodate outdoor seating areas. The Pentagon Village master plan address es the zones of activity surrounding the property by organizing building placement, site access points, and open space with purposeful connections. The west property line faces Highway 100 and this activity is addressed by orienting an office building to take advantage of quick views from automobiles. Architectural materials, building roof decks, tenant and property signs are best oriented to the west. The West 77th Street overpass (over Highway 100) is elevated and site access and visibility is limited. A n open green space, associated with the west building, is positioned in the curve of the overpass . Retail uses are located on the north and west side of the property. These locations are compatible with the retail, residential and/or office uses on the o pposite side of West 77th Street, and the future uses planned within the Pentagon Park North redevelopment adjacent to the Fred Richards Park. This position also allows for the retail access to be separated and contro lled from the other uses on the propert y . The east side is organized around building edges pushed to the street helping define the master plan density and city patterns . The prominent Pentagon Village Plaza contains a number of beautiful art components by famed local sculptor, James Brenne r, which provide a visual cue into the site from the corner of West 77th Street and Computer Avenue. An east -west access at mid -block allows automobile connection to parking structure and drop off areas o f building entries. The south side provides access to parking structures , which incorporates shared parking opportunities and is associated with other existing auto -oriented uses nearby such as the existing car wash on the southwest corner lot. City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 4 Land Use; Live-able Precincts Promote well -balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. The Pentagon Village master plan provides for a mix of uses that create a well-balanced aggregation of places that enco urage a live-able precinct that will draw people to the property. The strategic integration of office, housing, restaurant s and hospitality uses cross -promote user activity within the site. With sufficient public parking and visible pedestrian and bike paths connecting to the nearby Fred Richards Park and Regional Trail system, Pentagon Village encourages and supports communit y connectivity and activity . Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Pentagon Village’s mix of uses with its incorporation of office, ho spitality, housing and restaurants combined with accessible and connected green spaces will draw people to the area both from outside and from within the community. The onsite and area amenities will appeal to site employers who recognize that retaining and attracting talent is a priority. This activity will support other nearby businesses and contribute to the sustained economic vitality of the community in which it serves. The property is very accessible from a network of regional highways and city roadways. The Pentagon Village master plan will enhance and support development on adjacent or nearby sites with the number of people that it will draw to the local community leading to a more energized and activated area . With the completion of Pentagon Village, a new and enhanced gateway will be established into the City of Edina that will create momentum and demand for further redevelopment. This gateway will also enhance the exposure and interest for the Fred Richards Park and utilization of the Regional Trail system to not only those people living within the City of Edina but also to those that desire to visit and take advantage of these unique amenities. Sketch Plan Application for Lot 3 This Sketch Plan application specifically relates to the proposed development on Lot 3 where we ar e changing the use from an extended stay hotel to a multi -family housing project. While no formal name for the project has yet been identified, the project will be called Pentagon Village Apartments for the purposes of this application. Multi -Family Housing Project Description The proposed building will include approximately 200 for-rent apartment units in five levels. It is anticipated that the building will also include one level of covered on -grade parking. Additional parking will be available in a small surface lot and in the existing parking structure on the adjacent lot. Continuing with the approach of crafted v iews into the site and having all building front doors have a connection to Pentagon Village as a whole, this building has been positioned on the site to create a welcoming and connected entry experience for guests and residents alike. At the second level, the U-shaped building wraps a courtyard amenity deck which opens to the south, having the potential to further activate and City of Edina Sketch Plan Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 5 enhance the street edge along Viking Drive. This building will become an integral part of Pentagon Village and help to balance the development, activating the site with permanent residents 24 hours a day. The residents will enjoy the convenient access to the surrounding amenities , eas e of access to various types of transportation, and the welcoming open and green spaces throughou t Pentagon Village. Commitment to Sustainable Development The design of this residential building will fulfill a commitment and holistic approach to sustainable design taking into consideration energy use, water use, place making, ecology, materials, circularity of prod uc ts (supply chain), as well as equity and justice for both the residents and the neighborhood. This building will be constructed with Modular units by RISE modular. Modular construction is inherently sustainable for a variety of reasons including but not limited to a substantial reduction in construction waste, less disturbance of the site during construction, decrease in energy consumption during construction, and overall emissions decrease by minimizing construction delive ries to the site. The site will be thoughtfully considered in terms of sustainable landscaping (drought tolerant and low water use), permeable surfaces, water treatment, and connection and promotion of alternative transportation. The building constructio n will include multiple energy and water savings measures throughout. Ultimately, the effort that will be put towards great design and the use of quality construction methods will facilitate the construction of a landmark building at the edge of the Pentagon Village development . These measures will ensure the longevity of the use of this building , making it ultimately sustainable. Commitment to Affordable Housing We recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live an d work in the City of Edina. The Pentagon Village Apartments will provide a minimum of 10% of its residential units at 50% of the average market income (AMI). The development team and ownership of the Pentagon Village Apartments will provide this affordab le housing component at no cost to the city or public. www.pentagonvillageedina.com development April 23, 2021PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS21-0068 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 4911 77th St W Edina, MN Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South 1000 ft N➤➤NImage Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 2 21-0068 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Economic Vitality and Competitiveness Urban Design Land Use Transportation and Mobility Parks and Public Life District Services and Facilities Sustainability Water Resources PUBLIC AMENITIES GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT Concentration of jobs, residences, medical services, traffic, and activity. Attracting residents, workers, customers, patients, visitors, and others from throughout the region, Greater Southdale District is a major destination. Role as economic engine for the city and region. The economic impact of this area is significant, particularly in terms of sustaining the tax base for the City of Edina. Meeting diverse housing needs of the population. Greater Southdale District has a variety of diverse housing types that meet the needs of Edina residents, and are not generally available in many areas of the city. Retail and services hub for the community. In addition to its role in the regional economy, Greater Southdale District meets the needs of the community for retail and services, with the capacity to evolve for changing preferences. Capacity for growth and change. The Greater Southdale District has been an evolving area since its inception. It has more capacity for growth and change than many other areas of the city. GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT CORE ELEMENTS SITE AS MOBILITY HUB Mobility Hubs. Bringing together different modes of travel – walking, transit, biking, and shared mobility - and integrating the location with information technology to help travelers find, access, and pay for transit and shared mobility services creates a mobility hub. Strategically locating mobility hubs at gateways to the District (Southdale Center, Centennial Lakes and near Highway 100 in the 76th Street/77th Street corridor), encourages people to access the heart of the district by modes other than cars. A network of green, lined by community-focused destinations will create a diverse set of opportunities for people to participate as a community across the Greater Southdale District. The red dots represent mobility hubs and the yellow circles represent ½ mile walking distance. The intent of the Mobility Hub location is to encourage pedestrian to use the central-spine-like Centennial Lakes Park and or the Promenade as the main corridor to get to events, shopping and home. For residents, the experience of walking home should be the best part of the day, marked by a chance encounter, a pickup game of basketball, or an early meal out. The same can be said for visitors arriving at one the three Mobility Hubs: “It’s never too far to walk to where you want to go within the Greater Southdale District!” SITE SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 3 21-0068 Modular Construction o Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction o Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood. o Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction o Controlled production environment minimizes site risks while improving build quality and worker safety. o Decreases energy consumption during construction o Reduction of overall emissions by decreasing deliveries to site Energy and Carbon o Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina) o Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction o Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance o LED lighting throughout Water and Wastewater o Looking at the percentage of pervious surface on the property and maintaining as much as possible o Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout o Efficient plumbing layout and design o Potential for non-potable water reuse o Thoughtful stormwater management o Efficient irrigation and potential water reuse strategies Place and Ecology o Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem o Will carefully consider what % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants can be used o Increase tree canopy at property (zero trees currently on site) o Drought tolerant landscape o Pollinator friendly landscape o Green outdoor amenity deck: amenity lawn / garden conceals parking below podium Materials and Circularity o Manage construction waste o Waste management plan for building o Recycling provided for residential units o Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units o Use of products with recycled content and ingredient transparency as much as possible o Use of regional materials where possible Equity and Justice o 10% of residential units will be affordable o Promote alternative transportation o Bicycle parking near main entry for guests o Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents o Potential for EV charging stations to be provided o Potential to provide parking for car-sharing vehicles REGENERATIVE DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 4 21-0068 2000 ft N➤➤N Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Edina Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 47,941 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 20,672 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 47,457 51,800 54,000 56,100 100 494 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVE77TH ST. W trail public transit route transit stop park wetland Highly Connected Located in 9 Mile Creek Watershed Challenged Water Table Borders City of Bloomington Main Roads Trails / Transit Wetlands and Parks SITE MAP Nord Myr Park Fred Richards Park www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 5 21-0068 9 MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Imagery ©2021 Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA Farm Service Agency, Map data ©2021 200 ft Image capture: May 2018 Images may be subject to copyright. Hema latha Thotakura Photo - May 2018 Fred Richards Park 9 Mile Creek Trail9 Mile Creek Trail On Street Trail FRED RICHARDS PARK PENTAGON VILLAGE SITE CONTEXT FOOD JOBS PARKS SCHOOLS www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 6 21-0068 SITE FROM SOUTH SITE FROM EAST LOT 3 - FROM EAST PLAZA TRELLIS PARKING STRUCTURE SITE ENTRY FROM EAST PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 7 21-0068 The master plan is organized around The Plaza at Pentagon Village framed with the buildings, creating a village commons. Ample green space and landscaping allow people to access the plaza from surrounding neighborhood and the building front doors. The office space and a dual brand hotel surround the plaza, with retailers and restaurants easily accessible via pedestrian walkways. Designed as a programmable space, the plaza will host events, concerts and other social opportunities year-round. Two retail spaces frame the entrance and act as the front doors to the development. The master plan highlights the building exteriors with an “urban edge” design style. This makes the architectural details of the buildings visible from the nearby highways. Materials like aluminum, metal, glass and landscaped screen walls add texture and depth to the buildings. PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN PROPOSED SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 8 21-0068 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN - LOT 3 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING 6 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE - LOT 3 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 9 21-0068 LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 2 - APPROVED HOTEL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION PENTAGON VILLAGE DESIGN CHARACTER FOR REFERENCE ONLY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 10 21-0068 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP COMPUTER AVENUESITE PLAN 1 2 3 Entry Lobby Art Walk Residential Patios 4 5 6 Pool Fire Pit Bike Lounge 7 8 Bike Parking Move In Zone 1 2 4 6 5 8 7 DEDICATED SPACE FOR EASE OF LARGER SIZED VEHICLES TO PARK AS NEW RESIDENTS MOVE. DEDICATED PARKING FOR BIKERS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LOUNGE AND EXTERIOR TRAILS. INDOOR AMENITY WITH QUICK CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE TRAIL CONNECTIONS WITH BIKE PARKING. OUTDOOR AMENITY FOR SOCIAL GATHERING THAT HAS VIEW OUT OF THE CITY. THE PRIMARY EXTERIOR AMENITY ON THE AMENITY DECK. PROVIDES EXTERIOR PRIVATE SPACES FOR LOWER LEVEL RESI- DENTS THE MAIN WALK TO THE BUILDING AND CAMPUS. CREATES A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE AND SENSE OF ARRIVAL. WELCOME GUESTS AND RESIDENTS WITH ART, LANDSCAPE, OR EXTERIOR FEATURE AS THEY ENTER THE BUILDING.. 9 Stormwater Management Strategies BELOW GRADE FILTRATION TANKS. CAPTURE AND TREAT STORMWATER ON SITE. 3 3 39 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 11 21-0068 EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE INTERNAL DRIVE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVELOBBY BIKELOUNGEENCLOSED PARKING FLEXIBLE SPACEFLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 12 21-0068 AMENITY SPACE UNITS UNITS AMENITY DECK FLOOR PLAN - 2ND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 13 21-0068 UNITS UNITS FLOOR PLANS - 3RD - 6TH FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 14 21-0068 0' 68'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEVIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVEEXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTYLINEFUTURE HOTEL FUTURE HOTEL 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 FUTURE COMMERCIAL INTERNAL DRIVE 0' 68' ~71' T.O. PARAPET 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 MASSING SECTION - BUILDING HEIGHTS BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - NORTH/SOUTH www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 15 21-0068 Total Bldg. GSF 232,965 Total Acres 1.78 Density (U.P.A.)107.01 Total SF 77,340 Level 1 Coverage (%) 72% FAR 3.01 Level 1 55,800 Level 2 36,485 Level 3 35,170 Level 4 35,170 Level 5 35,170 Level 6 35,170 232,965 New Parking Stalls Surface 5 Parking Structure (first level of proposed apartment building)161 Existing Parking Stalls (used for the proposed aparment building) Surface 0 Parking Structure 84 Parking Stalls/ Unit 1.25 T O T A L P A R K I N G 250 S I T E M E T R I C S T O T A L B U I L D I N G M E T R I C S Gross Building S Q U A R E F O O T A G E B Y F L O O R AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH EAST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH EAST MASSING CO M P U T E R A V E COMPUTER AVEVIKING BLVD 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 1 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 4 SITE PLAN REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RETOFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 5 DATA TABLE SUMMARY OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2 HOTEL 1 HOTEL 2 PARKING (office) PARKING (hotel) RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL / OFFICE 25,000sf per floor5 floors125,000sf total 20,000sf per floor5 floors100,000sf total 193 keys4 floors 153 keys4 floors 1,155 spaces 390 spaces 7,500 sf 4,300 sf 19,000 sf 70 spaces 125spaces REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RET /OFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 14 DIAGRAM: GREEN CONNECTIONS NMCRT&FREDRICHARDSPARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 15 SITE ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 16 AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 17 NORTHWEST CORNER & PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 27 CENTRAL PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 28 PARK & OFFICE 2 ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 29 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL DROP OFF 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 30 PARKING DECK AND HOTEL 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 31 VIKING DRIVE 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 3 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Site