HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-05-22 Planning Commission Regular Meeting MinutesMINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MAY 22, 2013
7:00 PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Scherer, Potts Carpenter, Kilberg, Cherkassky, Carr, Platteter, Forrest, Grabiel, Staunton
Absent from Roll: Schroeder
III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA
Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the May 22, 2013 meeting agenda.
Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT
During "Community Comment," the Planning Commission will invite residents to share new issues
or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Commission or which aren't
slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair
may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally
speaking, items that are elsewhere on this morning's agenda may not be addressed during
Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Commission Members to respond
to their comments today. Instead, the Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration
at a future meeting.
No public comment.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Variance. University of St. Thomas/Crown Bank/JMS Companies. 6433 McCauley Terrace,
Edina, MN
Planner Presentation
Planner Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is located on the east side of McCauley
Terrace consisting of a vacant lot that is approximately one acre in size and that backs up to Arrowhead
Lake. The lot is 44,099 square feet in area and was platted in 1975. The applicants are hoping to build a
2 1/2 story home with an attached three car garage. The applicants would like to locate the new home at
Page 1 of 15
a setback of 52.8 feet from the front lot line. The ordinance requires that the new home match the
adjacent front yard setback of the home located south of the subject home. The property to the south is
a neck lot with the home located 152 feet from McCauley Terrace right-of-way. The new home is
proposed to be a walk-out with back yard views towards Arrowhead Lake.
Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the requested variance based on the
following findings:
The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because:
• The practical difficult is caused by the location of the home to the south and the required front
yard setback based on a neck/flag lot.
• The encroachment into the setback would be consistent with other homes fronting the cul-de-
sac. The request is reasonable given the location of the adjacent neighbor to the street, the
setback required from the Lake and the easement areas within the lot.
Approval of the variance is also subject to the following condition:
1. The home must be construction per the proposed plans date stamped,
2. May 6, 2013.
3. Final grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer prior to
issuance of a building permit.
4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions
to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements.
5. The execution and recording of a Conservation Easement 75 feet upland from the Ordinary High
Water level of Arrowhead Lake.
Appearing for the Applicant
Steve Johnson and Teresa Ling from the University of St. Thomas
Discussion
Commissioner Grabiel said he observed an encroachment between properties on one of the schematics.
Planner Aaker acknowledged the encroachment, adding it would be a civil matter between the property
owners.
Applicant Presentation
Mr. Johnson reiterated City staffs position that the lot would be virtually unbuildable without a
variance.
Ms. Ling explained that she, along with Mr. Johnson and fellow students attend a real estate program at
the University of St. Thomas, adding they will follow this process through to completion of the new
house and its sale. Ms. Ling said it's a great learning experience and a portion of the profits would go to
student scholarships for St. Thomas. Johnson and Ling thanked the Commission for their time and asked
for their support of the variance request.
Page 2 of 15
Discussion
A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that the lot would be unbuildable without a
variance, adding there are practical difficulties to support granting the variance.
Motion
Commissioner Potts moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions.
Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
B. Final Rezoning, Final Development and Final Plat. Anderson-KM Builders (Byerly's) 7171
France Avenue, Edina, MN
Planner Presentation
Planner Teague informed the Commission Lund Food Holdings is requesting final review for a proposal
to tear down the existing 59,000 Byerly's grocery store, located at 7171 France Avenue and build the
following in phases. The first phase would include a new 47,119 square foot Byerly's store and a
six/seven-story 109-unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking (Building A). Phase
two would include a six/seven-story, 77-unit apartment building with a first floor 10,711 square foot
retail area and two levels of underground parking. (Building B.) and lastly a six-story, 48-unit apartment
building with 11,162 square feet of retail space on the first level and two levels of underground parking.
(Building C.)
Teague said this In building the first phase, the new Byerly's store would be constructed in the parking
lot of the existing store at the northwest corner of the site, and Building A would be constructed in the
southeast corner of the site. The existing store would remain open. When the new store is finished the
existing store would be removed, and then Buildings B & C would be constructed.
Continuing, Teague explained preliminary approvals have been granted and at this time the applicant is
seeking the following for this final review; Final Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to
PUD, Planned Unit Development; (Including a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to establish the PUD
Zoning District.), Final Development Plan; and Final Plat
Teague further explained that the underlying zoning of the property would be PCD-3, therefore, would
be subject to signage requirements of that zoning district. The applicant has submitted a signage plan to
approve for the overall development. The locations and size of pylon signs, wall signs and way finding
signs are included in the PUD regulations for this site. This site is unique as a unified development, with
four separate lots, four buildings, including three separate retail and three separate residential
buildings. Site way finding will be important.
Page 3 of 15
Planner Teague concluded that staff recommds that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from
PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD, and Final Development Plan to build a new 47,119 square
foot Byerly's store; a 6/7-story 109-unit apartment building with two levels of underground parking; a
6/7-story, 77-unit apartment building with first floor 10,711 square foot retail area and two levels of
underground parking; and a six-story, 48-unit apartment building with 11,162 square feet of retail space
on the first level and two levels of underground parking.
Approval is also subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the above criteria
would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as "Mixed Use Center — MXC,"
which encourages a mixing of uses, including retail and multifamily residential. The proposed
uses are therefore consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
4. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property. The Byerly's store
would be pulled up close to the street, with sidewalks in front, and separated from the street by
green space to promote a more walkable environment.
5. Pedestrian connections would be made from France Avenue to the Promenade from the north
and south sides of the site, as well as through the middle.
6. The applicant is also proposing sustainability principles within their project narrative, and
pledges an energy efficiency standard that would exceed the code driven energy efficiency
standard by a minimum of 5%.
7. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone, precast concrete, metal and glass
building.
8. The site circulation would be improved with a right-in and right-out added along France Avenue.
9. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
a. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a
consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian
environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner
buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement.
n Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots.
n Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings,
rather than between buildings and the street.
b. Movement Patterns.
n Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods
along secondary streets or walkways.
Page 4 of 15
n A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern
discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship
between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement.
c. Appropriate Parking Standards. Mixed use developments often produce an internal capture
rate. This refers to residents and workers who obtain goods and services from within the
development without making additional vehicle trips. Parking ratios for mixed use
development should reflect the internal capture rate and the shared parking opportunities
this type of development offers.
d. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure and
that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.
Approval is subject to the following Conditions:
1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below:
• Site plan date stamped April 26, 2013.
• Grading plan date stamped April 26, 2013.
• Utility plan date stamped April 26, 2013.
• Landscaping plan date stamped April 26, 2013.
• Building elevations date stamped April 26, 2013
• Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City
Council meeting.
2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff
approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted
for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening,
or erosion control measures.
3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies.
4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions
to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements.
5. The Final Plat must be filed at the County within one-year after City Council approval. If the plat
is not filed it shall be deemed null and void.
6. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat.
7. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication
funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value
of the easement shall be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication
fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit.
8. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2012.
9. All public utility, roadway and sidewalk easements shall be dedicated to the City.
10. Attempts must be made meet an energy savings goal of 10%.
11. No delivery truck traffic shall be allowed on 70th Street.
Page 5 of 15
12. Final Rezoning is subject to a Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD, Planned Unit
Development for this site.
Teague further recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat to create a new four
lot subdivision at 7171 France for the proposed project. Approval is subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements.
Approval is also subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the Final Rezoning of the subject property to Planned Unit Development, PUD.
2. The Final Plat must be considered within one-year after approval of the Preliminary Plat, or the
Preliminary Plat shall be deemed null and void.
3. A shared parking and access agreement must be established across the Plat.
4. A park dedication fee of $5,000 per dwelling unit is required. A portion of the park dedication
funds shall be used to develop the water feature, and maintain an easement over it. The value
of the easement would be deducted from the park dedication requirement. The park dedication
fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per each unit.
Appearing for the applicant
Jim Vos, Cresa
Applicant Presentation
Mr. Vos delivered a power point presentation highlighting the changes to the proposal from preliminary
to final and responding to the conditions stipulated by staff. Vos stated for the most part the final plans
address previous issues, adding there are changes and minor clarifications. Vos did note that final plans
contain an expanded store mezzanine and the addition of the requested architectural detail on the
north face. Vos stated that housing remains relatively unchanged, though the exterior materials have
been upgraded.
Discussion
Chair Staunton asked Mr. Vos if Macy's and the property to the east (Wolfson) are on board. Mr. Vos
responded at this time they have presented temporary construction licenses and/or reciprocal access
easement agreements to both Macy's and Wolfson's. Vos added he meets with Mr. Wolfson tomorrow
to finalize their agreements.
Chair Staunton commented that in general he finds the signage package complimentary but questions
the height of the sign at the roundabout/Hazelton. Staunton asked Vos to speak to the signage package.
Commissioners Scherer and Forrest expressed concerns with the signage package.
Mr. Vos explained that the signage package includes monument signs and their locations and size,
way finding signage and wall signs. In response to Chair Staunton's question on signage near the
Page 6 of 15
roundabout Vos explained that the sign is needed at a specific height due to the roundabouts interior
height. Vos also pointed out that signage is important because this site contains four parcels with two
uses and signage has to accommodate both pedestrian and vehicular way finding.
Commissioner Platteter also commented about the height of the pylon sign as previously mentioned by
Chair Staunton. Vos reiterated that the intent of this sign is to enhance way finding and the height is
needed because of the design of the roundabout. Platteter further questioned if signage facing the
Promenade should match other Promenade signs.
A lengthy discussion ensued on signage especially the way the proposed way finding sign addresses the
Promenade. Commissioner Scherer stated she would like to see the City develop a consistent sign
"package" along the Promenade and for other parks. Scherer noted that currently signage is prohibited
from facing a park. Chair Staunton acknowledged that currently the Ordinance prohibits signs facing
City parks; however, that was the result of a conscious effort by the City to develop the Centennial Lakes
area with the rear of the retail buildings facing the park; with no signage facing park property. Since the
initial development of this area the Promenade has been greatly enhanced and it is becoming part of
the Centennial Lakes park system. The question now is how to address signage on the "park".
The discussion continued on signage with Commissioners expressing the need for amending the sign
ordinance to address park signage and other Commissioners in favor of the signs as presented; noting
flexibility is needed in way finding and in opening up the site to everyone including walkers of the
Promenade. Mr. Vos commented that Byerly's would be the first site along the Promenade inviting the
public into their area to share their amenities.
Planner Teague pointed out that this request is for a PUD rezoning which is the reason a signage
package was included. Teague reminded Commissioners a PUD rezoning is site specific. This sign
"package" is only for this site; this project.
Commissioner Grabiel asked Mr. Vos to speak to drainage and underground water storage. Mr. Vos
explained with the aid of graphics water flow, percolation, Swedish storage system, pipe gallery, swale
and rain gardens.
Commissioner Platteter asked Mr. Vos the reasoning behind the covered sidewalk. Mr. Vos explained
that the corporate office likes the idea of a covered sidewalk, adding it is part of the plan. Platteter said
from his experience covered walkways don't always age well. Platteter stated he isn't in favor of
deferring the parkland dedication fee as suggested by the applicant.
Commissioner Forrest asked the applicant to present the exterior materials board.
Mr. Holmes, Pope Architects, told the Commission that the building materials for the retail component
and housing would be complementary. The freestanding store would consist of a metal roof edge and
fascia, insulated glass in aluminum frame storefront system, precast concrete panels, scored, buff color,
standing seam metal roofing and metal coping, and a manufactured stone base with brick on precast
panel. The columns and pilasters are natural stone veneer. Continuing, Holmes stated the housing
element would include metal coping, aluminum sunscreen, stucco, insulated vision glass in aluminum
frame systems, stucco sign band for retail Building A and varying shades of brick.
Page 7 of 15
Public Hearing
No public comment.
Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All
voted aye; public hearing closed.
Motion
Commissioner Carr moved to recommend Final Rezoning, Final Development and Final Plat approval
based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion.
Commissioner Scherer asked Commissioners Carr and Grabiel if they would accept an amendment to
their motion that would include an additional condition that any signage proposed to face the
Promenade "be held" until the City approves an ordinance regulating signage facing City parks. Planner
Teague responded that amending the sign ordinance with regard to signage facing City parks would be a
big undertaking, adding careful thought must go into any amendments to the ordinance. He suggested
that signage facing the park be in coordination with signs along the Promenade.
Chair Staunton suggested that the amendment state that any sign facing the Promenade is consistent in
size and appearance to what the City wants to see in signage on the Promenade.
Commissioner Carr said she can't accept an amendment that would change the Ordinance; adding that
would be too restrictive in her opinion. Carr pointed out the City stressed to the applicant during the
preliminary review process and approval the importance of opening up their site to visitors of the park.
Carr pointed out without adequate way finding signage visitors may feel they are trespassing on private
property.
Chair Staunton stated that amendment was not accepted by the mover.
Chair Staunton asked Commissioners how they feel about deferring the Parkland Dedication on Building
A until a certificate of occupancy is issued. Commissioner Carr stated in her opinion the applicant needs
to determine the value of the easement area and the value of construction and deduct that from the
total and present their findings to the City Council for their determination. Carr said she would like the
applicant to calculate those figures before this proceeds to Council. Commissioners agreed to support
the staff condition requiring that park dedication fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit per
each unit.
Commissioner Carpenter stated he is generally supportive of the project with some reservations.
Commissioner Grabiel stated he supports the project as presented adding he looks forward to this
redevelopment.
Commissioner Scherer stated she also supports the project; however, continues to have reservations on
how signage addresses City parks.
All voted aye; motion carried.
Page 8 of 15
C. Site Plan Review. Brian Lubben, Walker & Associates/Fairview Southdale Hospital. 6401
France Avenue, Edina, MN
Planner Presentation
Planner Teague informed the Commission Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing to build a two-level
88,974 square foot addition for a new Emergency Care and Urgent Care Center at their site at 6401
France Avenue. The existing Emergency and Urgent Care facility would be remodeled for hospital use.
To accommodate the proposed addition the following is requested; a Site Plan Review, drive-aisle
setback from 20-feet to 6-10 feet for the new round-a-bout drop off and pick up area and drive aisle in
front of the addition adjacent to Crosstown Highway and a Parking Stall Variance from 2,728 to 2,051
spaces.
Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Site Plan with
Variances for Fairview Southdale Hospital based on the following findings:
1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Site Plan with the
exception of the parking space variance and drive aisle setback variance.
2. WSB conducted a parking and traffic impact study. The study concluded that the existing
roadway system would support the proposed project; and the parking on the site would contain
adequate parking to support the expansion and existing uses.
3. The variances requested are reasonable. The drive-aisle setback variance would have no impact
on Crosstown Highway. There would still be a 40-foot green space separation between the
freeway on ramp and the hospital drive-aisle. The parking study concludes that the site would
be adequately parked.
4. The west parking ramp could be expanded should there ever be a need for additional parking for
the site.
Approval of the Site Plan is also subject to the following conditions:
1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial
conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below:
• Site plan date stamped April 24, 2013.
• Grading plan date stamped April 24, 2013.
• Landscaping plan date stamped April 24, 2013.
• Building elevations date stamped April 24, 2013.
• Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City
Council meeting.
Page 9 of 15
2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff
approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted
for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening,
or erosion control measures.
3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies.
4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require
revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements.
5. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated May 17, 2013.
6. Should delays and queuing become an issue at the France Avenue/65 Street intersection in the
future, minor intersection turn lane and phasing improvements may be necessary. Should these
improvements be required in the future Fairview Southdale Hospital will be responsible for their
share of those improvements.
7. Fire lanes must be signed subject to review and approval of the fire marshal.
Appearing for the Applicant
Robert Gruman, Administrator Fairview Southdale Hospital, Brian Lubben, Walker & Associates, Vicki
Hooper and Amy Dunlap hGA.
Applicant Presentation
Robert Gruman gave a brief history of the hospital and the request and introduced the development
team. Concluding, Gruman asked the Commission for their support.
Vikki Hopper with the aid of graphics explained the 89,000 square foot emergency center addition.
Hooper said the build out includes shell space on three levels and 9,420 square feet of renovated space.
Hooper explained that the project includes observation units on the second level to accommodate
patient stays of less than 24 hours, main level emergency services and basement area for office space.
Hooper also added the helipad will be relocated and existing central plant will be enlarged to
accommodate the additional program area.
Amy Dunlap explained to the Commission the materials that will be used on the addition.
Brian Lubben explained to the Commission the variance request for setback is to provide easy
movement within the site for vehicles. The variance would be from the outermost curve of the
roundabout. Continuing, Lubben explained the second variance is for parking, adding that Fairview
Southdale Hospital (FSH) has conducted multiple parking counts and found on average the current daily
peak usage is roughly 1,500 vehicles. Lubben said the highest count complied was roughly 1,700
spaces. Lubben noted the reduction from 2,575 spaces to 2,051 spaces would still provide 37 percent
more parking spaces than the actual daily peak use and 21 percent more than the highest recorded
parking usage. Concluding, Lubben stated that he believes the increased visits to the emergency room
would increase incrementally.
Page 10 of 15
Russ Williams addressed the Commission and stated that the new emergency center would be high
quality and would meet the needs of the aging population. Williams said their goal is to provide
absolute care for the region, adding Fairview Southdale Hospital ranks #1 in survival rates for heart
attack patients. Concluding, Williams said the community deserves a great emergency room.
Discussion
Commissioner Grabiel commented that he observed on the plans that there is quite a distance between
the freeway and the ramp and questioned if the County would require screening. Grabiel said he
wondered if vehicle headlights from the new entrance to the ER could shine on vehicles accessing Hwy
62 via the ramp off France Avenue. Commissioner Platteter also questioned if the County had any plans
to widen the entrance ramp. Mr. Gruman responded that the plans have been submitted to
MnDOT for their review.
Chair Staunton asked for a "walk-through" of the internal and external building functions before and
after expansion. With graphics Gruman pointed out the changes to the site as the result of the
expansion. Gruman also noted that the new emergency center (ER) would be constructed while the
present ER is operating. This provides the utmost care of Fairview's patients.
Commissioner Carr commented that she has used the ER in the past with her mother and expressed
concern about emergency parking during the construction phase. Gruman said everything will be done
to minimize difficulty in parking during this time. Gruman reported that they are considering starting a
valet service for the ER and will add additional parking spaces at the front. Gruman acknowledged that
emergency parking availability during the construction phase would need to be strictly monitored to
ensure adequate parking.
Commissioner Forrest commented that she shares the concern about emergency parking and asked Mr.
Gruman if he knows what the percentage of trips to the ER is from ambulances. Forrest said in her
opinion more needs to be done to address temporary emergency parking; she stated presently
emergency parking is confusing, adding parking may be adequate but its where the emergency parking
is located that's the problem. Gruman responded that he believes 1/4 of the ER visits are by ambulance.
Commissioner Scherer also noted urgent care parking demands. Gruman said the reconfiguration of the
interior spaces would bring the urgent care component closer to the emergency room, acknowledging
adequate parking is a very important component during the construction phase and after.
Commissioner Platteter questioned the number of handicapped parking stalls indicated on the plans,
adding the required handicapped parking spaces need to be met; however, it may be possible to
provide more "short term" parking if this area exceeds the required spaces for handicap parking. Mr.
Gruman responded that parking in front of the ER hasn't been finalized, adding he would look
into those numbers.
Page 11 of 15
Commissioner Potts questioned if more parking could be accommodated elsewhere on the campus. Mr.
Gruman responded that the ramp is designed to "hold" three more levels. Gruman reiterated FSH
doesn't want an issue with parking. Potts asked what would trigger another level. Gruman noted
that parking spaces are carefully monitored and the hospital would request another level before the
parking formula requiring an additional level would even "kick in". Gruman also added that emergency
parking appears to be at its highest during the evenings and weekends, not during peak times.
Commissioner Carr said the addition of valet parking for the ER is a good start and asked Mr. Gruman if
Fairview was considering some type of roof top decking or green space. Mr. Gruman said those plans
haven't been finalized; however landscaping would be revisited, adding they plan on adding additional
landscaping for this project.
Chair Staunton said his one concern is safety near the roundabout. He asked the applicant to take
another look at spacing in this area.
Chair Staunton opened the public hearing.
Public Hearing
The following spoke in support of the project:
Kevin Waterston, 7110 France Avenue, Edina, MN
Martin Kirsch, 6725 Penn Avenue South, Richfield, MN
Chair Staunton asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue; being none Commissioner
Potts moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Platteter seconded the motion. All voted aye;
motion carried.
Discussion
Chair Staunton asked Chuck Rickart, WSB traffic consultant if he had any comments on the project.
Chuck Rickart explained that he analyzed the potential traffic and parking impacts from the proposed
expansion of the Fairview Southdale Emergency Center and broke it into three pieces; urgent care,
existing ER and new space. Rickart said in the short term he finds no issues. He added no
modification to the access is planned with the expansion project; however, the ring road is planned to
be modified to include a new roundabout that will accommodate the new expansion. Continuing,
Rickart pointed out redevelopment is planned in this area which includes the 65th Street intersection and
when/if the growth of the proposed redevelopments causes this intersection to breakdown the hospital
would be responsible for paying their portion of any changes/modifications made to the intersection.
Page 12 of 15
Concluding, Rickart said with regard to parking that Fairview Southdale has very extensive parking
numbers, adding his analysis supported their numbers and he was comfortable with those numbers.
Motion
Commissioner Carpenter commented he has no problem with the proposal as submitted.
Commissioner Platteter moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval based on staff
findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion.
Chair Staunton suggested that the applicant take another look at the area between the new
roundabout and MnDOT property and find a way to buffer that area and to ensure an adequate
turn around radius. Mr. Grumman responded they would take the initiative and review this area
and provide some form of buffer; probably through landscaping.
Commissioner Forrest also suggested that they take another look at emergency parking availability from
the users perspective.
All voted aye; motion carried. 8-0
VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Zoning Ordinance Update — Residential Development
Discussion
Chair Staunton reminded the Commission for some time they have been discussing the impact of
residential development and redevelopment and potential changes to the Ordinance. Staunton said at
this time he would like the Commission to give input on how they want the public hearing (June 12,
2013) to proceed.
Commissioners indicated the public hearing should include the following:
• A brief presentation needs to be given at the onset chronicling the timeline of this issue (how
the Commission got to this point).
• Acknowledge up front there are some issues the Commission doesn't agree on; however public
input from residents, builders and the Commission will help finalize the process.
• The final discussion and "vote" on the proposed changes would be done at the June 26th
meeting; again this gives the Commission and staff time to digest and apply if warranted the
information received at the public hearing.
Page 13 of 15
• After the "timeline "introduction introduce the proposed Ordinance changes as topic/headings;
similar to the Memo the Commission received from Staff on April 24th. Discuss each "topic".
Inform the public that what's presented is the Commissions current thinking.
• Proceed in two parts; June 12 th Public Hearing; June 28th discussion, finalization and vote.
• Make sure the public has access to the language and materials that have been discussed in the
past up to this point. Ensure that all materials on the website are "up to date".
• Put out two (2) City Extra's informing the public of the June 12th meeting.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
Chair Staunton acknowledged back of packet materials.
VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS
Chair Staunton reported that the City Council officially established a CAT for the Grandview area.
IX. STAFF COMMENTS
None
X. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Carr moved adjournment at 10:20 PM. Commissioner Potts seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
Peke q009eIlegeret
Respectfully submitted
Page 14 of 15
SI Jo Si a2ud