Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-08-11 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAgenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Wednesday, August 11, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the meeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. To participate in Public Hearings: Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 4795815. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta8 member will introduce you when it is your turn. Or attend the meeting to provide testimony, City Hall Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Planning Commission July 28, 2021 V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Public Hearings A.B-21-24, 1.16 foot +rst ,oor height variance at 4913 Sunnyslope Road East VII.Reports/Recommendations A.B-21-20, Lot coverage variance request for 6601 Biscayne Blvd VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Sta6 Comments X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampli+c ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: August 11, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion July 28, 2021 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the minutes from the J uly 28, 2021 P lanning Commission. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes Planning Commission July 28, 2021 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers July 28, 2021 I. Call To Order Chair Nemerov called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Berube, Bennett, Agnew, Bartling, Olsen, Alkire and Chair Nemerov. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Strauss and Cullen. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Bartling moved to approve the July 28, 2021, agenda. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, July 14, 2021 Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the July 14, 2021, meeting minutes. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Commissioner Bartling indicated on page 3 Mr. Sonnek is referenced as “architect for the applicants” and he is not an architect so he should not be referenced as such. She noted on page 4 “Cutting Nail Architects” should be changed to “Cuningham Architects.” Motion carried as amended. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Sustainable Buildings Policy Sustainability Coordinator Grace Hancock and CEE Marisa Bayer gave a presentation on a proposed sustainable buildings policy. Chair Nemerov thanked Ms. Hancock and Ms. Bayer for the presentation. Ms. Hancock and Ms. Bayer answered Commission questions. Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 2 of 3 VI. Community Comment Ms. Julie Risser, 6112 Ashcroft Avenue, shared concerns with the Commission about the triangle of discretion, planning staff reports and the New Horizon Day care, and construction management. VII. Public Hearings A. B-21-23, A variance for the relief from requirement to have a 50% full depth basement under the main floor – 4904 Bywood West Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request of 494 Bywood West for a variance . Staff recommended approval of the variance as submitted, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant The applicant indicated he did not have anything new to share. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Olsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission discussed the variance. Motion Commissioner Berube moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried. Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. VIII. Reports/Recommendations A. Finding that the Plan for 4040 W. 70th St. are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan – Tax Increment Financing Affordable Housing Coordinator Stephanie Hawkins presented the 4040 W. 70th Street proposed plans for development and asked the Commission to determine if this is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Tax Increment Financing. Staff answered Commission questions. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Motion Commissioner Olsen moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of Resolution No. B-21-22, finding that the proposed plan for development of the site is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. IX. Chair and Member Comments Received. X. Staff Comments Received. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Berube moved to adjourn the July 28, 2021, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:45 PM. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried. Date: August 11, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-24, 1.16 foot firs t floor height variance at 4913 S unnys lope R oad Eas t Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the 1.16 foot first floor elevation variance as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he subject property, 4913 S unnyslope Road E ast is located west of M innehaha C reek on the east side of the intersection of Sunnyslope R oad East and Dale D rive. T he existing home is a 1 ¾ story home with a tuck under garage built in 1941. T he applicant is requesting a 1.16-foot first floor height variance for a tear-down rebuild/new home. T he variance request is to allow the first floor of the new home to sit 2.16 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home, 1.16-foot higher than the allowed 1-foot height increase. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Applicant Submittal Staff Report Engineering Memo Site Location Map FINE HOME DESIGN AND INTERIORS 275 MARKET STREET • SUITE 54 • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55405 612.353.6940 MAIN • 612.354.3413 FAX • WWW.TRAUSCHER.COM ////////C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EREMOVE 23 LF±FLUSH CURB &REPLACE WITHB618 CURB PERCITY DETAILREMOVE 32 LF± CURBFOR PROPOSEDDRIVEWAY CURB CUTREMOVE 1,900 SF±CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAND WALKWAYREMOVE STONEPLANTERSREMOVETREE (TYP.)REMOVE 31LF± FENCINGREMOVEGAZEBOREMOVEPLANTERREMOVE 315SF± PATIOREMOVE 12 LF±RETAINING WALLPROTECTEXISTINGTREES (TYP.)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C100 - EC & REM.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:45 PM ( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALESBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC100EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVALS PLANBJLEDINA, MNCOPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION#DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)GENERAL SITE DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES:LEGENDEXISTINGPROPERTY LINEREMOVALSLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800CURB & GUTTERSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAIN|DRAINTILEGAS LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONESWALESPOT ELEVATION800.00BUILDINGOVERHEAD ELECTRICCOSOIL BORINGSTREE PROTECTION RINGBJLEROSION CONTROLEROS-01CURB AND GUTTERREMOVE EXISTINGBUILDING REMOVALREMOVALCONCRETE REMOVALREMOVE EXISTING C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898-17.0%-2.0%-12.2%-12.2%-3.4%-4.6%6.9%-1.5%-23.3%-33.0%PROTECT EXISTINGTREES (TYP.)SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSILT FENCE RINGSILT FENCE RINGINSTALL REDUNDANTPERIMETER CONTROLAT TOP OF CREEK BANKCATEGORY 3 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETFOR SLOPES 3:1 ANDGREATER (TYP.)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C200 - EROS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:45 PM SBIN4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC200EROSION & SEDIMENTCONTROL PLANBJLEDINA, MNCOPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION07/20/2021HOUSE REVISION#01DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800CURB & GUTTERSTORM SEWERDRAINTILESWALEWETLANDFLARED END SECTION OUTLETRIP RAPCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETINLET PROTECTIONBUILDINGFLARED END SECTION INLETSILT FENCESFSOIL BORINGSDIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOWITEMSILT FENCEUNITLINEAR FEETQUANTITY460CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCEEACH1EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT 3)SQUARE FEET1,100SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIESBJLEROSION CONTROLEROS-06GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREROSION CONTROLEROS-16TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE C100)EACH8EROSION CONTROLEROS-02( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALEINLET PROTECTION DEVICEEACH2EROSION CONTROLEROS-07EROSION CONTROLEROS-22 C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898MA/TC 887.87±MA/TC 889.45±894.72895.53899.81899.79899.50900.20899.64TW 898.46BW 894.46TW 893.96BW 890.90899.46TW 898.46BW 894.46893.96BW 888.50BW 892.00TW 895.22BW 895.30TW 899.30900.20BW 893.90BW 891.40BW 891.40BW 893.90TW 896.71TW 896.59885.75898.00TW 898.00BW 890.40TW 894.67BW 890.12890.40BW 890.48TW 893.44BW 890.12TW 893.08893.50BW 893.64TW 897.50BW 893.23TW 897.09898.06898.21898.79899.50899.50899.52-17.0%-2.0%-12.2%-12.2%-3.4%-4.6%6.9%-1.5%-23.3%-33.0%MA/TC 886.47±MA/TC 887.28±RAIN GARDENBOTTOM: 895.75EOF: 887.5510-YR HWL: 887.66STORAGE PIPES2 ROWS - 18" N-12 PIPE2 ROWS - 24" N-12 PIPE24" HEADERS6" OUTLETIE: 888.0019 LF 6" HDPE @ 2.0%6" OUTLETIE: 883.40MITERED TO SLOPENYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 886.4017 LF 6" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECTTO HEADERIE: 886.25NYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 886.4016 LF 6" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECT TOSTORAGE PIPEIE: 886.25CONNECT TOSTORAGE PIPEIE: 886.2544 LF 6" HDPE @ 7.3%NYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 889.50NYLOPLAST DOWNSPOUTTO HDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 892.7175 LF 6" HDPE @ 8.6%CONNECTTO HEADERIE: 886.253 LF 6" HDPE @ 0.0%18" NYLOPLASTMH W/ SOLIDGREEN COVERIE: 888.00 (E)IE: 884.44 (W)COPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION07/20/2021HOUSE REVISION#01DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C400 - GRAD.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:46 PM SBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC300GRADING & DRAINAGEPLANBJLEDINA, MNBJL LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONBUILDINGGENERAL GRADING NOTES:TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800SWALESPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE SLOPE800.00800.00EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORINGSEX SITEDISCHARGE (CFS)EX SITE DISCHARGEVOL. (AF)PR SITE DISCHARGE(CFS)PR SITE DISCHARGEVOL. (AF)10-YR (4.20 IN)1.130.0650.910.049VOLUME RETENTION REQUIRED (CF)VOLUME RETENTION PROVIDED (CF)NEW IMPERVIOUS = 3,301.63 SF x 1.1"302.65 CF TOTAL REQUIREDSTORAGE PIPE AREA VOLUME= 690 CF800.00STORMWATER MODELING RESULTS:PAVEMENT AREA 2,959 SFBUILDING AREA5,005 SFSEEDING AREA10,062 SFPRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS4,659 SFPOST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS7,964 SFAREA SUMMARY( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALENOMINALDIAMETER(IN)NOMINALO.D. (IN)TYPICALSPACING "S"(IN)NOMINALSPACING "C"(IN)TYPICALSIDE WALL"X" (IN)H (TRAFFIC)(IN)12141125.50812151811.50298121821173891224281441.50101230361853181236422263181242482472182448542578.501824606724901824STORMWATER MANAGEMENTBMP-XXREVE7001-110-111DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:25SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comDRAIN BASIN & INLINE DRAIN NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY9-30-99DATECJADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.03-11-16NMHDRAIN BASININLINE DRAINTHE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTOP SOILGRATE/COVERTOP SOILGRATE/COVER®©2011 NYLOPLAST4" MIN ON 8" - 24"6" MIN ON 30"THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898-0.14-0.45-0.59-0.270.07-0.24-0.65-0.34-0.59-0.46-0.59-0.150.100.780.22-0.15-0.40-0.76-1.72-1.94-1.360.080.771.131.481.842.192.28-3.050.070.380.791.191.23-0.920.310.04COPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION#DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C400 - GRAD.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:46 PM SBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC400CUT & FILL ANALYSISBJLEDINA, MNBJL LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800SWALESPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE SLOPE800.00800.00BUILDINGEOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORINGSGENERAL GRADING NOTES:800.00( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALEAREA BELOWFLOOD ELEVATION(892.30) (SF)CUT VOLUME (CY)FILL VOLUME (CY)NET VOLUME (CY)FINAL GRADE3,56057.849.38.5 (CUT)EARTHWORK ESTIMATESCUT AREA BELOW FLOODPLAINFILL AREA BELOW FLOODPLAIN 07-12-2021 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E DRAINAGE DESIGN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEMO 1 Date: July 12, 2021 Subject: Stormwater Management Memo 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E, Edina, MN Drainage Design Calculations On behalf of Josh Howie, Solution Blue has prepared drainage design calculations to be included in the project documents. Below is the Stormwater Management Memo detailing the drainage design calculations and BMPs included in this project, as well as pertinent attachments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project is located at 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E in Edina, Minnesota (“Site”). The proposed disturbance area for this project is under 1.o acres, therefore the City of Edina (“City”) has only required that this Site follow rate and volume control restrictions and the project should have no net fill. The purpose of this memo is to address these regulations. This project includes demolishing and building a new single-family home, demolishing and relocating the driveway, grading a rain garden in the front yard, burying storage pipes in the rear yard and grading to tie into existing elevations that will disturb less than one acre of total area. The proposed design intends to use a rain garden in the front yard that controls lees than 600 sf of new impervious area and underground storage pipes that collect the roof runoff in the back yard to help control the runoff rate as it leaves the Site towards Sunnyslope Rd E and Minnehaha creek. We analyzed the existing and preliminary proposed Site hydrology using HydroCAD. To estimate existing and proposed runoff rates we performed hydrology modeling for the existing and proposed Site. We divided the Site into drainage boundaries, input land use, soils information, surface storage, and precipitation depths corresponding to the required design storms. This project site contains loamy type soils, which are commonly Type B soils and good for infiltrating storm runoff. A Soils Map showing the entire Site can be found in Attachment C. The proposed stormwater management design will collect the site runoff from the driveway in a rain garden in the NW corner of the property and collect the roof runoff into underground storage pipes in the backyard to slow down the runoff. Comparing this BMP to the existing conditions against the 10-, and 100-yr design storms shows that the proposed design does not increase runoff rates and volumes. PROPOSED CONDITION CALCULATIONS The proposed BMP is a depressed area with an overland EOF in the rear of the property. This BMP will improve the overall runoff rate as well as providing some volume reduction. Since the Soils Map show Type B soils onsite, we assumed an infiltration rate of 0.45 in/hr and set the maximum overflow elevation of the BMP’s to a height of 1.8’ from the bottom of the BMP to ensure that the collected runoff will draw down completely within 48 hours (per general MPCA requirements). Solution Blue, Inc. Phone: 651-294-0038 444 Cedar Street info@solutionblue.com Suite 1005 www.solutionblue.com 07-12-2021 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E DRAINAGE DESIGN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEMO 2 Since the majority of the new impervious is captured in the BMP in the backyard and released towards Minnehaha Creek, a portion of the new impervious that is less than 600 sf is proposed to discharge to the storm sewer in Sunnyslope Rd E which has structural drainage issues. Since the amount of new impervious draining towards the areas of structural drainage issues is less than 600 sf of new impervious, the City’s volume control requirement is not applicable to this project. Therefore, the BMP’s are designed to retain the stormwater long enough to reduce the proposed design’s 10-yr discharge rate and volume below the existing values. Refer to the Construction Plan Set in Attachment A for site coverage and rate control calculations. Existing drainage patterns around the proposed site will be maintained when tying the grades back into the existing ground elevations, see Construction Plan Set in Attachment A. RATE CONTROL To provide enough volume control and peak flow retention for the 10-year event, runoff was directed to the proposed BMP’s mentioned above. By capturing and filtering stormwater runoff from the project Site, the peak discharge rates and 10-yr discharge volumes do not exceed the existing runoff rates & volumes. Table 1 shows the peak comparisons for the total site discharge. Overall, the HydroCAD model showed no increase in runoff rates in the Proposed design. Table 1 Peak Runoff Rates 1 See Attachment B HydroCAD report: Existing. 2 See Attachment B HydroCAD report: Proposed. CONCLUSION The proposed stormwater management plan for the residence at 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E will implement stormwater best management practices that provide enough rate control for the project Site. The proposed stormwater management plan for the Site consists of the following stormwater BMPs: a rain garden in the front yard and underground storage pipes in the back yard. The Site was modeled using HydroCAD for the existing and proposed 10-, and 100-year storm events based on Atlas-14 models to confirm that the project meets the stormwater rate control requirements from the City of Edina despite being below the disturbed area threshold. Our findings indicate the Site will successfully achieve the goals for peak runoff rate and volume rate. Please do not hesitate to contact Benjamin Lucas (651-289-5535, blucas@solutionblue.com) with any questions regarding this submittal or if additional information is needed. Sincerely, Solution Blue, Inc. Benjamin Lucas, P.E. Project Engineer Rainfall Event Existing Runoff Rate (cfs)1 Existing Runoff Volume (af)1 Proposed Runoff Rate (cfs)2 Proposed Runoff Volume (af)1 10-yr 24 hour (Atlas 14) 1.13 0.065 0.91 0.049 07-12-2021 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E DRAINAGE DESIGN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEMO A ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION PLAN SET ////////C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EREMOVE 23 LF±FLUSH CURB &REPLACE WITHB618 CURB PERCITY DETAILREMOVE 32 LF± CURBFOR PROPOSEDDRIVEWAY CURB CUTREMOVE 1,900 SF±CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAND WALKWAYREMOVE STONEPLANTERSREMOVETREE (TYP.)REMOVE 31LF± FENCINGREMOVEGAZEBOREMOVEPLANTERREMOVE 315SF± PATIOREMOVE 12 LF±RETAINING WALLPROTECTEXISTINGTREES (TYP.)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C100 - EC & REM.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:45 PM ( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALESBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC100EXISTING CONDITIONS &REMOVALS PLANBJLEDINA, MNCOPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION#DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)GENERAL SITE DEMOLITION AND CLEARING NOTES:LEGENDEXISTINGPROPERTY LINEREMOVALSLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800CURB & GUTTERSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAIN|DRAINTILEGAS LINEUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONESWALESPOT ELEVATION800.00BUILDINGOVERHEAD ELECTRICCOSOIL BORINGSTREE PROTECTION RINGBJLEROSION CONTROLEROS-01CURB AND GUTTERREMOVE EXISTINGBUILDING REMOVALREMOVALCONCRETE REMOVALREMOVE EXISTING C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898-17.0%-2.0%-12.2%-12.2%-3.4%-4.6%6.9%-1.5%-23.3%-33.0%PROTECT EXISTINGTREES (TYP.)SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSILT FENCE RINGSILT FENCE RINGINSTALL REDUNDANTPERIMETER CONTROLAT TOP OF CREEK BANKCATEGORY 3 EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETFOR SLOPES 3:1 ANDGREATER (TYP.)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C200 - EROS.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:45 PM SBIN4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC200EROSION & SEDIMENTCONTROL PLANBJLEDINA, MNCOPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION07/20/2021HOUSE REVISION#01DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800CURB & GUTTERSTORM SEWERDRAINTILESWALEWETLANDFLARED END SECTION OUTLETRIP RAPCONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEROSION CONTROL BLANKETINLET PROTECTIONBUILDINGFLARED END SECTION INLETSILT FENCESFSOIL BORINGSDIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOWITEMSILT FENCEUNITLINEAR FEETQUANTITY460CONSTRUCTION ROCK ENTRANCEEACH1EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (CAT 3)SQUARE FEET1,100SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIESBJLEROSION CONTROLEROS-06GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREROSION CONTROLEROS-16TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE C100)EACH8EROSION CONTROLEROS-02( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALEINLET PROTECTION DEVICEEACH2EROSION CONTROLEROS-07EROSION CONTROLEROS-22 C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898MA/TC 887.87±MA/TC 889.45±894.72895.53899.81899.79899.50900.20899.64TW 898.46BW 894.46TW 893.96BW 890.90899.46TW 898.46BW 894.46893.96BW 888.50BW 892.00TW 895.22BW 895.30TW 899.30900.20BW 893.90BW 891.40BW 891.40BW 893.90TW 896.71TW 896.59885.75898.00TW 898.00BW 890.40TW 894.67BW 890.12890.40BW 890.48TW 893.44BW 890.12TW 893.08893.50BW 893.64TW 897.50BW 893.23TW 897.09898.06898.21898.79899.50899.50899.52-17.0%-2.0%-12.2%-12.2%-3.4%-4.6%6.9%-1.5%-23.3%-33.0%MA/TC 886.47±MA/TC 887.28±RAIN GARDENBOTTOM: 895.75EOF: 887.5510-YR HWL: 887.66STORAGE PIPES2 ROWS - 18" N-12 PIPE2 ROWS - 24" N-12 PIPE24" HEADERS6" OUTLETIE: 888.0019 LF 6" HDPE @ 2.0%6" OUTLETIE: 883.40MITERED TO SLOPENYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 886.4017 LF 6" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECTTO HEADERIE: 886.25NYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 886.4016 LF 6" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECT TOSTORAGE PIPEIE: 886.25CONNECT TOSTORAGE PIPEIE: 886.2544 LF 6" HDPE @ 7.3%NYLOPLASTDOWNSPOUT TOHDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 889.50NYLOPLAST DOWNSPOUTTO HDPE ADAPTER6" HDPE 90° BENDIE: 892.7175 LF 6" HDPE @ 8.6%CONNECTTO HEADERIE: 886.253 LF 6" HDPE @ 0.0%18" NYLOPLASTMH W/ SOLIDGREEN COVERIE: 888.00 (E)IE: 884.44 (W)COPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION07/20/2021HOUSE REVISION#01DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C400 - GRAD.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:46 PM SBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC300GRADING & DRAINAGEPLANBJLEDINA, MNBJL LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONBUILDINGGENERAL GRADING NOTES:TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800SWALESPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE SLOPE800.00800.00EOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORINGSEX SITEDISCHARGE (CFS)EX SITE DISCHARGEVOL. (AF)PR SITE DISCHARGE(CFS)PR SITE DISCHARGEVOL. (AF)10-YR (4.20 IN)1.130.0650.910.049VOLUME RETENTION REQUIRED (CF)VOLUME RETENTION PROVIDED (CF)NEW IMPERVIOUS = 3,301.63 SF x 1.1"302.65 CF TOTAL REQUIREDSTORAGE PIPE AREA VOLUME= 690 CF800.00STORMWATER MODELING RESULTS:PAVEMENT AREA 2,959 SFBUILDING AREA5,005 SFSEEDING AREA10,062 SFPRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS4,659 SFPOST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS7,964 SFAREA SUMMARY( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALENOMINALDIAMETER(IN)NOMINALO.D. (IN)TYPICALSPACING "S"(IN)NOMINALSPACING "C"(IN)TYPICALSIDE WALL"X" (IN)H (TRAFFIC)(IN)12141125.50812151811.50298121821173891224281441.50101230361853181236422263181242482472182448542578.501824606724901824STORMWATER MANAGEMENTBMP-XXREVE7001-110-111DWG NO.1 OF 1SHEET1:25SCALEDWG SIZEA3130 VERONA AVEBUFORD, GA 30518PHN (770) 932-2443FAX (770) 932-2490www.nyloplast-us.comDRAIN BASIN & INLINE DRAIN NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTITLEPROJECT NO./NAMEMATERIALDATEREVISED BY9-30-99DATECJADRAWN BYTHIS PRINT DISCLOSES SUBJECT MATTER IN WHICHNYLOPLAST HAS PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. THE RECEIPTOR POSSESSION OF THIS PRINT DOES NOT CONFER,TRANSFER, OR LICENSE THE USE OF THE DESIGN ORTECHNICAL INFORMATION SHOWN HEREINREPRODUCTION OF THIS PRINT OR ANY INFORMATIONCONTAINED HEREIN, OR MANUFACTURE OF ANYARTICLE HEREFROM, FOR THE DISCLOSURE TO OTHERSIS FORBIDDEN, EXCEPT BY SPECIFIC WRITTENPERMISSION FROM NYLOPLAST.03-11-16NMHDRAIN BASININLINE DRAINTHE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321.NON TRAFFIC INSTALLATIONTOP SOILGRATE/COVERTOP SOILGRATE/COVER®©2011 NYLOPLAST4" MIN ON 8" - 24"6" MIN ON 30"THE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE CRUSHED STONE OR OTHERGRANULAR MATERIAL MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF CLASS I,CLASS II, OR CLASS III MATERIAL AS DEFINED IN ASTM D2321.BEDDING & BACKFILL FOR SURFACE DRAINAGE INLETS SHALL BEPLACED & COMPACTED UNIFORMLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D2321. C/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/EC/E890 895900889891892893894896897898899890890 890895895895 895895 886887 888889891891891892892892893893 893894894894896896 896896 897897897 898898898-0.14-0.45-0.59-0.270.07-0.24-0.65-0.34-0.59-0.46-0.59-0.150.100.780.22-0.15-0.40-0.76-1.72-1.94-1.360.080.771.131.481.842.192.28-3.050.070.380.791.191.23-0.920.310.04COPYRIGHT © 2021 BY SOLUTION BLUE INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDSOLUTION BLUE PROJECT NO:REVISION HISTORYDATEDESCRIPTIONI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.DATE:REG. NO.CERTIFICATION#DESIGNED:REVIEWED:PHASE:SUMMARYDRAWN:INITIAL ISSUE:BENCHMARKS (BM)IFCCADD USER: Benjamin Lucas FILE: C:\USERS\BENJAMINLUCAS\DROPBOX\PROJECTS\210701 - 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD - TC HOMEBUILDERS\WORKING FILES\CAD\DWG\PLAN SHEETS\C400 - GRAD.DWG PLOT SCALE: 1:1 PLOT DATE: 7/20/2021 3:46 PM SBINKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E, EDINA, MNBENJAMIN LUCAS07.20.21542652107014913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E TC HOMEBUILDERS 07/12/2021BJLC400CUT & FILL ANALYSISBJLEDINA, MNBJL LEGENDPROPOSEDPROPERTY LINEEXISTINGLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURTOPOGRAPHIC INDEX CONTOUR802800802800SWALESPOT ELEVATIONDRAINAGE SLOPE800.00800.00BUILDINGEOFEMERGENCY OVERFLOWSOIL BORINGSGENERAL GRADING NOTES:800.00( IN FEET )GRAPHIC SCALEAREA BELOWFLOOD ELEVATION(892.30) (SF)CUT VOLUME (CY)FILL VOLUME (CY)NET VOLUME (CY)FINAL GRADE3,56057.849.38.5 (CUT)EARTHWORK ESTIMATESCUT AREA BELOW FLOODPLAINFILL AREA BELOW FLOODPLAIN 07-12-2021 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E DRAINAGE DESIGN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEMO B ATTACHMENT B: HYDROCAD MODEL RESULTS 1X To Sunnyslope 2X To Minnehaha Creek EX Routing Diagram for 210701-DRAINAGE Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 7/10/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link EX - 4913 Sunnyslope E 210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Project Notes Rainfall events imported from "180405-Proposed Drainage.hcp" Copied 4 events from MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 storm EX - 4913 Sunnyslope E 210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.449 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1X, 2X) 0.007 98 Patio, HSG B (2X) 0.038 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1X) 0.059 98 Roofs, HSG B (1X, 2X) 0.003 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG B (2X) 0.556 68 TOTAL AREA EX - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1X: To Sunnyslope Runoff = 0.70 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Depth= 1.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 11,508 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,635 98 Paved parking, HSG B 1,304 98 Roofs, HSG B 14,447 69 Weighted Average 11,508 79.66% Pervious Area 2,939 20.34% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1X: To Sunnyslope Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.75 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=14,447 sf Runoff Volume=0.040 af Runoff Depth=1.46" Tc=10.0 min CN=69 0.70 cfs EX - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2X: To Minnehaha Creek Runoff = 0.43 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af, Depth= 1.33" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Adj Description 8,043 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,282 98 Roofs, HSG B * 313 98 Patio, HSG B 128 98 Unconnected pavement, HSG B 9,766 68 67 Weighted Average, UI Adjusted 8,043 82.36% Pervious Area 1,723 17.64% Impervious Area 128 7.43% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2X: To Minnehaha Creek Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.46 0.44 0.42 0.4 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 0.3 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=9,766 sf Runoff Volume=0.025 af Runoff Depth=1.33" Tc=10.0 min UI Adjusted CN=67 0.43 cfs EX - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach EX: Inflow Area = 0.556 ac, 19.25% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.41" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.13 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.065 af Outflow = 1.13 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.065 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach EX: Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 Inflow Area=0.556 ac 1.13 cfs 1.13 cfs 1S Grounds To Sunnyslope 2S-A Grounds To Minnehaha Creek 2S-B Roof To Minnehaha Creek PR 1P Rain Garden 2P Front Yard Storage Routing Diagram for 210701-DRAINAGE Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 7/10/2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Subcat Reach Pond Link PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E 210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 2HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Project Notes Rainfall events imported from "180405-Proposed Drainage.hcp" Copied 4 events from MN-St Louis Park 24-hr S1 storm PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E 210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 3HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing (selected nodes) Area (acres) CN Description (subcatchment-numbers) 0.372 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B (1S, 2S-A) 0.069 98 Paved parking, HSG B (1S) 0.115 98 Roofs, HSG B (2S-B) 0.556 73 TOTAL AREA PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 4HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Grounds To Sunnyslope Runoff = 0.59 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af, Depth= 1.60" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 7,998 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 2,984 98 Paved parking, HSG B 10,982 71 Weighted Average 7,998 72.83% Pervious Area 2,984 27.17% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Grounds To Sunnyslope Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=10,982 sf Runoff Volume=0.034 af Runoff Depth=1.60" Tc=10.0 min CN=71 0.59 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 5HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S-A: Grounds To Minnehaha Creek Runoff = 0.24 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Depth= 0.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 8,226 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8,226 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S-A: Grounds To Minnehaha Creek Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.26 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=8,226 sf Runoff Volume=0.015 af Runoff Depth=0.96" Tc=10.0 min CN=61 0.24 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 6HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment 2S-B: Roof To Minnehaha Creek Runoff = 0.60 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Depth= 4.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Area (sf) CN Description 2,401 98 Roofs, HSG B 2,604 98 Roofs, HSG B 5,005 98 Weighted Average 5,005 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 2S-B: Roof To Minnehaha Creek Runoff Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29" Runoff Area=5,005 sf Runoff Volume=0.039 af Runoff Depth=4.05" Tc=10.0 min CN=98 0.60 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 7HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach PR: Inflow Area = 0.556 ac, 32.99% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.07" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.91 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af Outflow = 0.91 cfs @ 12.26 hrs, Volume= 0.049 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Reach PR: Inflow Outflow Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)1 0 Inflow Area=0.556 ac 0.91 cfs 0.91 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 8HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 1P: Rain Garden Inflow Area = 0.252 ac, 27.17% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.60" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.59 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.034 af Outflow = 0.49 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.033 af, Atten= 17%, Lag= 3.7 min Discarded = 0.00 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.012 af Primary = 0.49 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 887.66' @ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area= 413 sf Storage= 405 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 423.4 min calculated for 0.033 af (97% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 408.1 min ( 1,237.6 - 829.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 883.75' 431 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 883.75 30 0.0 0 0 883.76 30 40.0 0 0 885.74 30 40.0 24 24 885.75 30 100.0 0 24 886.75 174 100.0 102 126 887.75 435 100.0 305 431 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 887.55'5.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 #2 Discarded 883.75'0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=887.66' (Free Discharge) 2=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.00 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.48 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=887.66' (Free Discharge) 1=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.48 cfs @ 0.84 fps) PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 9HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 1P: Rain Garden Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.252 ac Peak Elev=887.66' Storage=405 cf 0.59 cfs 0.49 cfs 0.00 cfs 0.49 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 10HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 1P: Rain Garden Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 883.75 30 0 883.80 30 1 883.85 30 1 883.90 30 2 883.95 30 2 884.00 30 3 884.05 30 4 884.10 30 4 884.15 30 5 884.20 30 5 884.25 30 6 884.30 30 7 884.35 30 7 884.40 30 8 884.45 30 8 884.50 30 9 884.55 30 10 884.60 30 10 884.65 30 11 884.70 30 11 884.75 30 12 884.80 30 13 884.85 30 13 884.90 30 14 884.95 30 14 885.00 30 15 885.05 30 16 885.10 30 16 885.15 30 17 885.20 30 17 885.25 30 18 885.30 30 19 885.35 30 19 885.40 30 20 885.45 30 20 885.50 30 21 885.55 30 22 885.60 30 22 885.65 30 23 885.70 30 23 885.75 30 24 885.80 37 29 885.85 44 34 885.90 52 39 885.95 59 45 886.00 66 50 886.05 73 55 886.10 80 60 886.15 88 65 886.20 95 70 886.25 102 75 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 886.30 109 80 886.35 116 85 886.40 124 90 886.45 131 96 886.50 138 101 886.55 145 106 886.60 152 111 886.65 160 116 886.70 167 121 886.75 174 126 886.80 187 141 886.85 200 157 886.90 213 172 886.95 226 187 887.00 239 202 887.05 252 218 887.10 265 233 887.15 278 248 887.20 291 263 887.25 305 278 887.30 318 294 887.35 331 309 887.40 344 324 887.45 357 339 887.50 370 355 887.55 383 370 887.60 396 385 887.65 409 400 887.70 422 415 887.75 435 431 PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond 2P: Front Yard Storage Inflow Area = 0.115 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 4.05" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.60 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af Outflow = 0.32 cfs @ 12.30 hrs, Volume= 0.039 af, Atten= 46%, Lag= 7.7 min Discarded = 0.01 cfs @ 8.60 hrs, Volume= 0.026 af Primary = 0.32 cfs @ 12.30 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 888.37' @ 12.30 hrs Surf.Area= 596 sf Storage= 821 cf Plug-Flow detention time= 726.3 min calculated for 0.039 af (100% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 726.4 min ( 1,478.6 - 752.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1A 885.67' 259 cf 7.45'W x 44.00'L x 3.00'H Field A 983 cf Overall - 336 cf Embedded = 647 cf x 40.0% Voids #2A 886.00' 266 cf ADS N-12 24" x 4 Inside #1 Inside= 23.8"W x 23.8"H => 3.10 sf x 20.00'L = 62.0 cf Outside= 28.0"W x 28.0"H => 3.92 sf x 20.00'L = 78.4 cf 4 Chambers in 2 Rows 5.78' Header x 3.10 sf x 1 = 17.9 cf Inside #3B 885.92' 184 cf 6.19'W x 43.25'L x 2.42'H Field B 647 cf Overall - 189 cf Embedded = 459 cf x 40.0% Voids #4B 886.25' 152 cf ADS N-12 18" x 4 Inside #3 Inside= 18.2"W x 18.2"H => 1.80 sf x 20.00'L = 36.0 cf Outside= 21.0"W x 21.0"H => 2.23 sf x 20.00'L = 44.5 cf 4 Chambers in 2 Rows 4.69' Header x 1.80 sf x 1 = 8.4 cf Inside 861 cf Total Available Storage Storage Group A created with Chamber Wizard Storage Group B created with Chamber Wizard Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 884.44'6.0" Round Culvert L= 22.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 884.44' / 884.00' S= 0.0200 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.020 Corrugated PE, corrugated interior, Flow Area= 0.20 sf #2 Device 1 888.00'6.0" Vert. Orifice C= 0.600 #3 Discarded 885.67'0.450 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area Discarded OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 8.60 hrs HW=885.92' (Free Discharge) 3=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.01 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.32 cfs @ 12.30 hrs HW=888.37' (Free Discharge) 1=Culvert (Passes 0.32 cfs of 1.31 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice (Orifice Controls 0.32 cfs @ 2.06 fps) PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 12HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Front Yard Storage - Chamber Wizard Field A Chamber Model = ADS N-12 24" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 23.8"W x 23.8"H => 3.10 sf x 20.00'L = 62.0 cf Outside= 28.0"W x 28.0"H => 3.92 sf x 20.00'L = 78.4 cf 28.0" Wide + 13.4" Spacing = 41.4" C-C Row Spacing 2 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +2.33' Header x 1 = 42.33' Row Length +10.0" End Stone x 2 = 44.00' Base Length 2 Rows x 28.0" Wide + 13.4" Spacing x 1 + 10.0" Side Stone x 2 = 7.45' Base Width 4.0" Base + 28.0" Chamber Height + 4.0" Cover = 3.00' Field Height 4 Chambers x 62.0 cf + 5.78' Header x 3.10 sf = 265.9 cf Chamber Storage 4 Chambers x 78.4 cf + 5.78' Header x 3.92 sf = 336.4 cf Displacement 983.4 cf Field - 336.4 cf Chambers = 647.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 258.8 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 524.7 cf = 0.012 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 53.4% Overall System Size = 44.00' x 7.45' x 3.00' 4 Chambers 36.4 cy Field 24.0 cy Stone PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 13HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Front Yard Storage - Chamber Wizard Field B Chamber Model = ADS N-12 18" (ADS N-12® Pipe) Inside= 18.2"W x 18.2"H => 1.80 sf x 20.00'L = 36.0 cf Outside= 21.0"W x 21.0"H => 2.23 sf x 20.00'L = 44.5 cf 21.0" Wide + 14.3" Spacing = 35.3" C-C Row Spacing 2 Chambers/Row x 20.00' Long +1.75' Header x 1 = 41.75' Row Length +9.0" End Stone x 2 = 43.25' Base Length 2 Rows x 21.0" Wide + 14.3" Spacing x 1 + 9.0" Side Stone x 2 = 6.19' Base Width 4.0" Base + 21.0" Chamber Height + 4.0" Cover = 2.42' Field Height 4 Chambers x 36.0 cf + 4.69' Header x 1.80 sf = 152.4 cf Chamber Storage 4 Chambers x 44.5 cf + 4.69' Header x 2.23 sf = 188.5 cf Displacement 647.4 cf Field - 188.5 cf Chambers = 459.0 cf Stone x 40.0% Voids = 183.6 cf Stone Storage Chamber Storage + Stone Storage = 336.0 cf = 0.008 af Overall Storage Efficiency = 51.9% Overall System Size = 43.25' x 6.19' x 2.42' 4 Chambers 24.0 cy Field 17.0 cy Stone PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 14HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pond 2P: Front Yard Storage Inflow Outflow Discarded Primary Hydrograph Time (hours) 727068666462605856545250484644424038363432302826242220181614121086420Flow (cfs)0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 0.45 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 Inflow Area=0.115 ac Peak Elev=888.37' Storage=821 cf 0.60 cfs 0.32 cfs 0.01 cfs 0.32 cfs PR - 4913 Sunnyslope E NOAA 24-hr A 10-yr Rainfall=4.29"210701-DRAINAGE Printed 7/10/2021Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 15HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 02082 © 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Stage-Area-Storage for Pond 2P: Front Yard Storage Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 885.67 328 0 885.72 328 7 885.77 328 13 885.82 328 20 885.87 328 26 885.92 596 33 885.97 596 45 886.02 596 57 886.07 596 67 886.12 596 78 886.17 596 88 886.22 596 99 886.27 596 112 886.32 596 125 886.37 596 138 886.42 596 152 886.47 596 168 886.52 596 185 886.57 596 202 886.62 596 220 886.67 596 239 886.72 596 258 886.77 596 277 886.82 596 296 886.87 596 316 886.92 596 336 886.97 596 356 887.02 596 377 887.07 596 397 887.12 596 417 887.17 596 438 887.22 596 458 887.27 596 479 887.32 596 499 887.37 596 519 887.42 596 539 887.47 596 559 887.52 596 578 887.57 596 598 887.62 596 617 887.67 596 635 887.72 596 653 887.77 596 671 887.82 596 687 887.87 596 703 887.92 596 717 887.97 596 730 888.02 596 744 888.07 596 757 888.12 596 770 888.17 596 782 Elevation (feet) Surface (sq-ft) Storage (cubic-feet) 888.22 596 792 888.27 596 802 888.32 596 813 888.37 596 821 888.42 596 828 888.47 596 835 888.52 596 841 888.57 596 848 888.62 596 854 888.67 596 861 07-12-2021 4913 SUNNYSLOPE RD E DRAINAGE DESIGN: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MEMO C ATTACHMENT C: WEB SOIL SURVEY RESULTS Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/8/2021 Page 1 of 3497340049734104973420497343049734404973450497340049734104973420497343049734404973450472680472690472700472710472720472730472740472750472760 472680 472690 472700 472710 472720 472730 472740 472750 472760 44° 54' 50'' N 93° 20' 46'' W44° 54' 50'' N93° 20' 42'' W44° 54' 48'' N 93° 20' 46'' W44° 54' 48'' N 93° 20' 42'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 15N WGS84 0 20 40 80 120 Feet 0 5 10 20 30 Meters Map Scale: 1:429 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 5, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: May 15, 2020—Jun 9, 2020 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/8/2021 Page 2 of 3 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L52E Urban land-Lester complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes 0.7 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 0.7 100.0% Soil Map—Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/8/2021 Page 3 of 3 Hennepin County, Minnesota L52E—Urban land-Lester complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: gj3x Elevation: 800 to 980 feet Mean annual precipitation: 23 to 35 inches Mean annual air temperature: 43 to 50 degrees F Frost-free period: 124 to 200 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Urban land:75 percent Lester and similar soils:20 percent Minor components:5 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Urban Land Setting Landform:Moraines Parent material:Loamy till Description of Lester Setting Landform:Hills on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Till Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: loam BE,Bt - 5 to 34 inches: clay loam Bk - 34 to 60 inches: loam C - 60 to 80 inches: loam Properties and qualities Slope:18 to 35 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum content:25 percent Gypsum, maximum content:1 percent Available water capacity:High (about 10.4 inches) Map Unit Description: Urban land-Lester complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/8/2021 Page 1 of 2 Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R103XY020MN - Loamy Upland Savannas Forage suitability group: Steep; Fine Texture (G103XS017MN) Other vegetative classification: Steep; Fine Texture (G103XS017MN) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Kingsley Percent of map unit:5 percent Landform:Hills on moraines Landform position (two-dimensional):Backslope Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Other vegetative classification:Steep; Fine Texture (G103XS017MN) Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 16, Jun 5, 2020 Map Unit Description: Urban land-Lester complex, 18 to 35 percent slopes---Hennepin County, Minnesota Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 7/8/2021 Page 2 of 2 The subject property, 4913 Sunnyslope Road East is located west of Minnehaha Creek on the east side of the intersection of Sunnyslope Road East and Dale Drive. The existing home is a 1 ¾ story home with a tuck under garage built in 1941. The applicant is requesting a 1.16-foot first floor height variance for a tear-down rebuild/new home. The variance request is to allow the first floor of the new home to sit 2.16 feet higher than the existing first floor of the home, 1.16-foot higher than the allowed 1-foot height increase. The FEMA 1%-annual chance flood elevation on the subject property is 888.2’, therefore the lowest floor is required to be no less than 890.2’. The proposed lowest floor elevation is 890.91’. There is also local 1% flood shape located on the subject property. Due to the elevation of the local flood shape, the lowest opening elevation in the front is 894.2’. With exception of the first-floor elevation, the proposed project meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. August 11, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-21-24, a 1.16-first floor elevation variance for a new home at 4913 Sunnyslope Road East Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property, 4913 Sunnyslope Road East, was built in 1941. The lot is 24,151 square feet and is located on the west side of Minnehaha Creek. The existing home is a 1 ¾ story home with a tuck under three car garage. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and submitted with comments as attached in their August 2, 2021, memorandum. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Side yard West Side – Front Yard South Side – Side Yard East Side – Rear Yard Setback from naturally occurring lakes and ponds 10 feet 56.85 feet 10 feet 50 feet 15 feet 57 feet 15.28 feet 50.02 feet First Floor Elevation Existing House: 899.6 Max FFE: 900.6 901.76* Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf 25% 21.6% Height Max Elevation of 935.7 40 feet 934.19 38.49 feet *Requires a variance STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Staff believes the variance criteria is met in this instance. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. The practical difficulty is caused by the floodplain elevation and the basement elevation requirement. The applicant has designed the proposed home where it will comply with the overall height requirement (based on existing grade) with the proposed first floor elevation increase. The increase in first floor elevation will allow for a standard basement ceiling height. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The variance allows the new home basement to be placed out of the flood zone. There is not FEMA flood elevation requirements and local flood shapes on every similarly zoned property. The proposed project provides the elevated basement while still complying with the maximum allowable stucture height as measured from existing grade. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? The proposed home design reflects the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. The maximum height from existing grade will conform even given the increase in 1st floor elevation. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the surrounding neighborhood. The variance request as proposed raises the subject property’s first floor elevation to be more similar to the two adjacent properties on either side. The properties on either side of the subject property have a first-floor elevation of 904.5. Staff Recommendation Approve a 1.16-first floor elevation variance for a new home at 4913 Sunnyslope Road East. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the floodplain elevation requirements and the elevation of the existing first floor. 2. There is not FEMA flood elevations and local flood shapes on every similarly zoned property. The proposed project provides the elevated basement floor while still complying with the maximum allowable height a measured from existing grade. 3. Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans date stamped July 21, 2021. 2. Comments and conditions listed in the August 2, 2021 Engineering Memo. DATE: 8/2/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 4913 Sunnyslope Rd E - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included existing and proposed site plans, grading and drainage plan, erosion and sediment control plan, and stormwater management plan stamped July 12, 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes to demolish the existing home and proposes a new home. The request is for a variance to the first-floor elevation. Easements A 24 -inch stormwater pipe is located along the southside of the property. A 10’ easement centered on the pipe is requested. The proposed retaining wall on the southside shall be relocated out of the easement area. Grading and Drainage The existing s ite drains to Sunnyslope Rd E and Minnehaha Creek. Drainage paths will be maintained post- construction. Stormwater Mitigation No increase in peak rate to private properties for 10% annual probability event (NOAA Atlas 14, 10 -year). Reduction of volume equal to 1.1 inches times new contributing impervious surfaces required if proposing the addition of over 600 square feet of new impervious surface in areas that drain to structural flooding issues. With less than 600 SF of new impervious directed to the structural flooding issue and no drainage path to private property, the requirements are met. Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP -003 standards. A final grade as -built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Floodplain Development The FEMA 1%-annual chance flood elevation is 888.2’ per the FEMA map. Thus, the lowest floor is required to be at no less than 890.2’. The proposed lowest floor elevation is 890.91’. A local 1%-annual chance flood shape is located in the front with an elevation of 892.3’. Thus, the lowest opening elevation in the front is 894.2’. The proposed top of foundation is 900.58’; proposed lowest opening elevation to be indicated on permit plans to confirm compliance. Net fill is not allowed below 892.3’. Sheet C400, Cut & Fill Analysis, indicates a net cut of 8.5 CY. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP -002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to relocate the existing driveway entrance. A driveway entrance permit will be required . The street was reconstructed in 2005. Refer to standard plate 540 and 543 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from Sunnyslope Rd E. A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP -024. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. Watermain as -built dated 1938 and 1945. Structure built 1941. Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) does not have any well documentation for this site or any other on Sunnyslope Rd E. A well is not likely located onsite. Thus, coordination with MDH will not be required . Tiered retaining walls are proposed . If the combined height or individual walls is/are greater than 4 -feet and the walls are not considered independent (less than 2 times the height of the lower wall in separation), the applicant will be required to s ubmit drawings, cross-section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, Henn epin County, Edin a, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 4913 Sunny slope Road East July 15, 2 021 1 in = 75 f t / Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-4913 Sunnyslope Road East Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 1.16 foot first floor elevation variance at 4913 Sunnyslope Road East VISITORS 8 CONTRIBUTORS2 RESPONSES2 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 01.First and Last Name 02.Address 03.Comment Raisin Laskin 4901 East Sunnyslope Road, Edina The builder met with neighbors and walked us through the house plan / variance request. We appreciated the opportunity to better understand the variance request. The proposed first floor height seemed appropriate and not out of scale compared to neighboring properties. The builder also noted that the house was shifted on the lot to allow more space between the proposed house & neighbor to the north. We would support the variance. It would be great to figure out a good solution to help protect the large tree on the north side of the property. 01.First and Last Name 02.Address 03.Comment Greg Ansems 4907 East Sunnyslope Road, Edina I am against this variance. Having seen the plans for the home, which the builder was more than generous in sharing, it seems like the home is stretching all of the variances in size. It would create a house that is not only bigger on the first floor, but likely dramatically bigger on the second floor and overall on the lot. It wouldn’t fit in the neighborhood. Looking across the creek, they have very strict guidance on what can be done on that side, but it doesn’t seem to apply on this side. I’m not sure why that is. I am against this because it will create a home that is way too big for the lot. Being on the creek, it’s important to have a home that fits within the character of the neighborhood and not overly big. Thank you. -Transcribed by City Staff (voicemail received 8-4-21 at 5:59 PM) Date: August 11, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-20, Lot c overage varianc e reques t for 6601 Bisc ayne Blvd Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he variance requested is for a 1.3%, or a 210 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit for property located at 6601 Biscayne B lvd. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Revised plan staff memo Revised Survey Revised plans Revised elevations Revised rendering Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 7-8-21 Noon Survey Staff Report Site Location Narrative Plans Variance support Owner's Statement Lands cape Applicant Pres entation Engineering Memo Staff Pres entation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: August 11, 2021 To: Planning Commission From: Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner Re: *Revised* variance plans – 6601 Biscayne/1.3%, (210 sq ft) lot coverage variance request. The Planning Commission is asked to consider a variance request for a 1.3%, or a 210 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit for property located at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. The original request was heard by the Planning Commission on July 14, 2021, for a 9 - foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5%, or a 229 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit. The applicant was directed by the Commission to consider a redesign of the project to reduce or eliminate the rear yard setback request. The redesign has eliminated the rear setback request and reduced the coverage request from 1.5%, (229 sq ft) to 1.3%, (210 sq ft). This project involves removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The variance application is for an increase of 1.3% over the allowed 25% lot coverage. Current lot coverage is 29.2% so this project would be a net reduction to 26.3%. The applicant has stated the purpose is to allow enjoyment of their back yard from the upper, (main), level without relying on stairs, as the owners intend to age-in-place. The following page provides a compliance table that demonstrates how the proposal would comply with Standards on the lot. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table Principal Structure (House) City Standard Proposed West Side – East Side - South– (previous plan) North Side – 10 feet 15 feet 25 feet 31.4 feet 22 feet 28.4 feet (16 feet*) / 25 feet 34.5 feet Building Coverage- (previous plan) 25% (26.5%*)/ 26.3%* *Requires a variance Highlights/Revised plan: Revised plan conforms to all setbacks including the minimum 25 foot rear yard setback. The previous plans had the addition 16 feet from the rear lot line, requiring a 9 foot setback variance. Original plan had proposed coverage at 26.5%, or 1.5% over the maximum allowable 25%. The new plan reduces the coverage to 26.3%, or a .2%, (19 sq ft), reduction from the original request. The existing property is over on lot coverage at 29.2% coverage. The proposal will bring down the existing nonconforming coverage to 26.3% or 210 sq ft over the 25% maximum. The purpose of the request is to allow the owner’s intent to age-in-place and keep the additions on one accessible level. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 N 3 51 B D C 4 TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK 10' - 7 3/4"17' - 3"9' - 10 1/2"GRIDLINE TO INTERSECTION HOUSE9' - 11 1/2"DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK 877' - 4 13/16" EXISTING GRADE CENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSA 2 A2.1 2 A2.1 3 A2.1 1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONDESIGN REVISIONChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 10/26/17 GENERAL NOTES -FLOOR PLANS 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING OR FOUNDATION WALL, U.N.O. 2. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR LOAD BEARING LOCATIONS AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR SECTIONS. 3. PLUMBING WALLS ARE TO BE 2 x 6 FRAMING. ANY PLUMBING WALLS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. MECHANICAL DUCTS TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM, U.N.O. FLOOR TRUSS MFG. TO VERIFY LOCATIONS. 5. ANY DROPPED CEILINGS REQUIRED FOR DUCTWORK WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL KNEE WALLS TO BE 2 x 4 FRAMING, U.N.O. SEE WALL SECTIONS FOR INSULATION LOCATIONS. SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 GROUND LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/2021 KITCHENDININGOFFICEHALL 3 51 B B D D C 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISH N GRILL STATION/ LANDING DINING LIVING DN 9' - 10 1/2"9' - 11 1/2"A 2 4' - 0 3/4"7' - 10 3/4" 2' - 9"14' - 6"2' - 9" OVERHANG AT EXISTING SHED 10 1/2" A2.1 2 A2.1 3 A2.1 1 LOW ROOF EAVEHIGH ROOF EAVEROOF EAVEFLAT CEILING 7' - 8" SLOPED CEILING, SEE ELEVATION BEAM ABOVE EXISTING EAVE DECKING DIRECTION DECKING DIRECTION SEAMS BELOW PORCH WALL WHERE POSSIBLE DOWNLIGHTING SCONCE U.N.O. HAIKU FAN w LIGHT RED DOT GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET TH AIR VENT THERMOSTATwTH LEGEND OPEN CORNERS: NO CABLE RAILING AT EXTERIOR CORNERS wwwww w DOWN DOWN DOWN UP/ DOWN DOWN DOWN HAIKU FAN w LIGHT JOTUL GF 370 STOVE (BLACK)w/ BLACK REFLECTIVE PANEL. REMOTE CONTROLLED. STOVE PIPE TO RUN STRAIGHT. GLASS HEAT SHIELD BY OWNER @ BACK OF STOVE STEEL POST, TYP. SEE STRUCTURAL 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, PTD 2X4 FLANKING CEDAR MULLIONS TO ACCEPT SCREEN PANELS, PTD DOWNSPOUT IN-FLOOR WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE BOXES, TYP. PLACE IN JOIST SPACE. 7 THUS DS CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONDESIGN REVISIONChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 1 Stove Location 3/22/2021 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 3 51 B D C 4 AIRVENT POWERVENT, SEE 4/A6.1 RIDGE V A L L E Y GUTTER SYSTEM, MATCH EXISTING DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT 2 A6.1 END GUTTERS AT F.O. HOUSE KICKOUT FLASHING BELOW APPX. LOCATION EXIST. PLUMBING STACK A 2 A2.1 2 A2.1 3 A2.1 1 V A L L E Y 1 3/4" / 12" 3 1/4" / 12" ROOF EDGE 1 3/4" / 12" EQ. DESIGN INTENT EQ. DESIGN INTENT DECK BELOW STAIR BELOW CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONDESIGN REVISIONChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.3 ROOF PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 B DCA E2E1 AT SIDE B2 F2F1 F3 35 142 B3 TRANSOM BEYOND ROOF LINE BEYOND D3 D7 D2 D6 D1 D4 D8 BDC A EXISTING HOME A1 A2 A3 C1 C2 A4 B1 AT SIDEB3TRANSOM AT SIDE CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONDESIGN REVISIONChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A2.1 ELEVATIONS 07/26/21 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"3 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION No.Description Date 07.23.2021 Rendering Image: Option 1 RUBIN SCREEN PORCH: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE SEE PLAN FOR CURRENT STAIR CONFIGURATION Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 07 July 2021 Public Hearing Comments-6601 Biscayne Blvd Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 9-foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5% (277.55 square foot) building coverage variance at 6601 Biscayne Boulevard VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 3 RESPONSES 3 0 Registered 0 Unverified 3 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 3 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jim and Mary Vandervelde Q2.Address 6605 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment We are fully supportive of the Rubins' porch and deck project. We've fully reviewed the plans and we are comfortable that it will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and won't cause any issues. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Esther Connor Q2.Address 6600 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment Russ and Karen are excellent neighbors who take meticulous care of their property. We have seen their plans and this would enhance their property and our neighborhood. We fully support them in their request to proceed with their porch. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Leslie ( Les) Jones Q2.Address 6600 Parkwood Ln Q3.Comment I live directly behind the Rubin's. I have live there for about 20 years. The Rubin's were living in their house when we moved in. At the fence line between our two properties the Rubin's have a tall evergreen trees that offer a lot of privacy between the two properties. I have looked at their proposal to add a porch off the main level and a ground level deck. I think that these additions to their house would be great for the Rubin's without affecting my property in any way. When we moved in we added a four season porch and deck off of our main level which has added a lot of enjoyment to my family over the years. I support their proposal for a variance. They are reducing the building coverage ratio and the 9 ft variance for the rear yard set back will not change anything for the Joneses. The way it looks is that the porch is encroaching the rear set back, not the open decks so noise would not be any more of an issue. I look forward to see the addition built for the Rubin's. I'm sure their family will enjoy the new space just like Nancy and I have enjoyed our porch and deck. Nancy and Les Jones 16'-0"9'-0"PROPOSED SETBACK                 July 14, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-21-20, A variance request for rear yard setback and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement for a porch addition at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Information / Background: Property owners, Russel and Karen Rubin, have submitted a variance request for rear yard setback from the 25-foot requirement and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement for residential lots over 9,000 square feet. The variances requested are for a 9 - foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5%, or a 229 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit. The applicant is requesting to add a 382 sq ft porch addition and 150 sq ft deck to the back of the home into the rear yard while removing a deck and reducing the size of their existing 606 sq ft patio. The property is currently at 29.2% coverage, by 4.2% or 641 sq ft over the maximum allowable building coverage of 25%. The proposed project will reduce coverage by 2.7% or 412 sq ft, however, will continue to be over the coverage limit by 1.5% or 229 sq ft. even with the reduction of the patio, is still over the maximum building coverage allowed by code. The proposed building coverage is 26.5% of the lot area. The building coverage calculations include the house, patio (after the first 150 square feet), and attached shed. It does not include the driveway or sidewalk. The proposal will reduce existing coverage and move the property closer to compliance. The back wall of the home is at 45.5 feet to the rear lot line; in compliance with the minimum 25-foot rear yard setback requirement. The proposal is to reduce the required setback to be 16 ft from the rear lot line or a 35% reduction in setback. Decks and patios can be a minimum of 5 feet to the side or rear lot line, however, all portions of the principle structure must be no closer than 25 feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The existing 15,251.3 square foot corner lot is located in the southwest quadrant of Biscayne Blvd and Londonderry Road. The lot today is at 29.2% building coverage. The existing house accounts for 24% of the lot coverage with the existing 606 sq ft patio and 338 sq ft deck the remainder of coverage. The requested proposal increases the house to account for 26.5% building coverage or a 2.5% increase in principle building area. The existing home complies with coverage limits allowing for an addition of 154 sq ft of building or 236 sq ft if the attached shed is removed, (82.5 sq ft). Although the lot coverage percentage will be reduced, the principle building area of the lot is increasing with the proposal, while it is currently under the maximum. The existing home is conforming at 45.5 feet from the rear lot line allowing for a 20.5-foot extension into the rear yard. There is ample opportunity to maintain the rear yard setback. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. An Engineering memo is attached. Compliance Table Principal Structure (House) City Standard Proposed West Side – East Side - South– North Side – 10 feet 15 feet 25 feet 31.4 feet 22 feet 28.4 feet 16 feet* 34.5 feet Building Coverage 25% 26.5%* *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues  Is the proposed variance justified? STAFF REPORT Page 3 Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. Staff questions if the proposal is reasonable. The existing home is well within the rear yard setback requirement of 25 ft allowing for a 20.5 ft extension into the back yard before required setback. Although the existing coverage conditions are greater than what the applicant is asking for, the requirement is the same percentage for all residential lots over 9,000 square feet in Edina. Building permits are not required for patios, and therefore situations where the building coverage is over 25% may occur without staff knowing, creating “existing conditions.” The property would be allowed an addition of 236 sq ft, (with shed removal), 25 feet from the back-lot line and have a deck or patio up to 150 square feet without a variance. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The percentage of building coverage is calculated the same for each lot over 9,000 square feet. The requirement is consistent throughout all residential properties over 9,000 square feet zoned R-1. The back wall of the home is 45.5 feet from the rear lot line allowing for a 20.5-foot addition into the rear yard. The design is a self-created condition with no unique property-based circumstance supporting the variance. The front yard setback is relatively standard, (the home is not located deep into the lot), the lot depth isn’t shallow and the rear lot line isn’t at an angle, so no physical unique challenges are identified supporting a rear yard setback variance. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Building coverage is treated the same throughout all neighborhoods in Edina. Lots greater than 9,000 square feet are allowed up to 25% building coverage and lots less than 9,000 square feet are allowed up to 30% building coverage. Each property in the neighborhood is expected to meet this requirement. Staff often hears from residents that projects appear to be over-built and massive even under the current code. Lot coverage and massing are issues continually raised when discussing “neighborhood character” with less massing and coverage the preference of residents. Recommended Action: Staff cannot support the variances requested for rear yard setback and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. It is especially difficult for staff to support or recommend approval of a variance from the code to exceed the building coverage requirement. Staff doesn’t believe there are unique circumstances to the subject property. Staff’s recommendation for denial of the requested variance is based on the following findings:  Historically staff has not recommended approval of lot coverage variances based on all lot coverage requirements being calculated the same on all single-family residential lots. STAFF REPORT Page 4  Variances must be based on the unique characteristics of a lot and not on an owner’s use of the property.  Approving the variances sets a precedent that could affect surrounding properties and neighborhoods with similar lot size and configurations. Deadline for a city decision August 5, 2021. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 660 1 Bi scayne July 1, 202 1 1 in = 94 f t / 3308 Gorham Avenue St. Louis Park MN 55426 | chris@christopherstrom.com | 612.961.9093 | christopherstrom.com VARIANCE DOCUMENTATION– 6601 BISCAYNE 7.1.2021 Architect’s Statement This project involves removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The purpose is to allow enjoyment of their back yard from the upper level without relying on stairs, as the owners (aged 70 and 72) intend to age-in-place. This application is for two variances to Edina Zoning Code: LOT COVERAGE: An increase of 1.5% over the allowed 25% lot coverage (Current lot coverage is 29.2% so this project would be a net reduction to 26.5%). REAR YARD SETBACK: Principal Buildings have a 25-foot minimum. Decks have a 5-foot minimum. For this covered deck, we are asking for a 9-foot deviation between the required and provided setback (16 feet from the property line) We believe that a granted variance will: A. Relieve practical difficulties. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE: 1. The proposed use is reasonable but there are difficulties in complying with the code, including functional and aesthetic concerns. 2. The current lot coverage is 29.2%, due to the rambler (1-story) style. Because of this style of low- slung home, main-floor additions for “one-level living” are technically prohibited, even though the home has very modest proportions compared to others in the neighborhood. 3. The sloping yard is not accessible for lesser-abled people. Please find the attached supporting documents: i) Owner Statement of home alterations to facilitate Aging in Place. ii) ‘Section Diagram Grade Change’: illustrating lack of accessibility to yard for lesser-abled people. iii) Comparative ADA accessibility requirements (slope) for accommodating people with low mobility. iv) Research supporting the importance of access to the outdoors. v) Excerpts from Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4 ’Housing’ acknowledging the need to be flexible to accommodate the aging demographic that is currently under-served. vi) Excerpts from Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 12 ‘Community Health’ demonstrating Edina’s commitment to their aging demographic. Page 2 of 4 REGARDING REAR SETBACK 1. The house was built before the 25% lot coverage rule had been adopted. The rambler does facilitate one-level living, however, it does not allow room for a covered outdoor space. 2. Recognizing a large discrepancy between the 5’ setback for Decks, and the 25’ setback for a Screened Porch (both fall under ‘Principal Building’), we believe that it is in keeping with the integrity of the neighborhood to have an intermediate point between the two. The proposed Porch is 16.5’ away at its corner point and doesn’t reach its full width until 23’ from the property line. We think this holds a beautiful proportion and suitable intermediary between the 5’ Deck setback and the 25’ house setback. 3. Being a corner property with more restrictive setbacks, the lot has a more limited construction area than its neighbors, with a “dual front yard setback” common to a corner lot. B. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district REGARDING LOT COVERAGE AND REAR SETBACK: 1. One-story “ramblers” are part of the identity of Edina, especially this fine example built by Carl Hanson. More and more of them get torn down every year, replaced by 2-story homes that may have a lesser “lot coverage” but are much more massive in scale. This existing home is very low- slung and unimposing, yet the particulars of the “lot coverage” calculation make it impossible to add-on to without a variance. This modest home would continue to be modest with this small addition of a screened porch. Variances are intended to accommodate projects that support the intent of comprehensive city plan, yet do not meet the numerical specifics of the zoning code. We doubt that neighbors would find this project at odds with larger city goals for development. If this variance is not granted, then the livability of the home will be compromised for these owners and make it more likely that the home would be sold, torn down and replaced with a bulkier building. C. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE: 1. Aesthetic improvement/ modernizing exterior components i) See rendering images ii) Neighbor’s support of intended improvements; statements to be forthcoming 2. Diminishing likelihood of tear-down by means of increasing owner commitment to reside in current residence as long as possible, increasing property value thus making it less appealing for future tear-down purchase, and increasing live-ability to potential future families i) Owner’s statement indicating dedication & continued intent to maintain and improve property ii) Project value: $215,000 3. Willingness to surrender rights to future pool/tennis court via easement incorporated into title or other approved method. Page 3 of 4 4. Neighborhood bulk comparison as illustration of compatibility/ reasonableness REGARDING REAR SETBACK: Willingness to surrender rights to future pool/tennis court via easement incorporated into title or other approved method. – On the next page is shown the 4 adjoining properties at the corner of Biscayne and Londonderry, illustrating the proximity to site-lines and size of footprint allowed a pool, compared to the proposed off-ground structure (hatched) Page 4 of 4 D. Not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE & REAR SETBACK: 1. New covered deck & outdoor deck barely visible from the road i) See rendering images. 2. Diminishing likelihood of tear-down i) (See C-2) E. Additional considerations 1. Improvement of drainage on-site i) See Landscape plan 2. Reducing Lot-coverage percentage by means of this proposed outdoor space. i) See Survey and ‘Existing and Proposed Site Plans’ ii) Supporting images of prior Lot Coverage reduction by Owner. 3. Open Deck minimally sized to the 150 s.f. allowance number. Covered/ screened Deck at 382 s.f. is more valuable for elderly demographic by virtue of its protective components against the elements and nature. Thank you for your consideration and review of this request. 878877876A 2 3 1 B D C 4 N NEAREST CATCH BASIN LOCATED AT NORTH-EAST CORNER OF PROPERTY @ LONDONDERRY x BISCAYNE PER W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING SURVEY FROM 10/06/2020 877' -0"878' - 0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"LONDONDERRY ROADEQUIPMENT ACCESSEXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 NEW RAISED DECK NEW COVERED PORCH REMOVE EXISTING RAISED DECK REMOVE EXISTING STAIRS AND LANDING 36" DECIDUOUS 36" DECIDUOUS TOPOGRAPHY: NO CHANGE COORDINATE DRAINAGE w/ LANDSCAPING CONSULTANT TREE PROTECTION FENCE TO BE TEMPORARILY REMOVED FOR CONCRETE AND STEEL WORK ONLY TREE PROTECTION FENCE - TO BE TEMPORARILY REMOVED FOR CONCRETE AND STEEL WORK ONLY 3' - 0"DI AME T E R , T Y P . 1 3 ' - 6 " REMOVE EXISTING PATIO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A0.0 TITLE SHEET & SITE PLAN 11/13/17 GENERAL CONTRACTOR CROWN CONSTRUCTION 5249 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 CONTACT: WILLIE ANDERSON PHONE: (612) 838-1899 CLIENT RUSS AND KAREN RUBIN 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 CONTACT: RUSS RUBIN PHONE: (763) 370-2767 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER A.M. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 112 EAST MAPLE ST. RIVER FALLS, WI 54022 CONTACT: DAVID WAGNER PHONE: (612) 290-8509 ARCHITECT CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 3308 GORHAM AVE. ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER STROM PHONE: (612) 961-9093 SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN PERSPECTIVE IMAGE FOR IMPRESSION & COLOR INTENTION ONLY. REFER TO 2D DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. WILLIE ANDERSON OF CROWN CONSTRUCTION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCEOF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AND CAN BE REACED AT (612) 838-1899 2. THE STREET WILL BE SWEPT CLEAN BEFORE THE END OF EACH DAY OF ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION, WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED INTO THE STREET. 3. AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 TO 1 AND AREAS NEXT TO WETLANDS/WATERBODIES GRADED OR EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING, OR OTHER MEANS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL 4. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. UNWORKED SOILS THAT REMAIN EXPOSED AND NOT IN USE FOR LONGER THAN 14 DAYS WILL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY SEED (GRASS, OATS, OR WHEAT) 5. NO CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR ON SITE UNLESS IT IS DONE WITH AN APPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE OR STANDARD. 6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH ADEQUATE PERIMITER CONTROL TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION. 7. INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY. 8. SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES AND REFUSE PROPERLY CONTROLLED. 9. TEMPORARY PUMPING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE USE OF AN APPROVED MINNESTOA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE OR STANDARD. 10. SOIL COMPACTION SHALL BE MINIMIZED; AREAS OF COMPACTED SOIL WILL BE REMOVED OR LOOSENED VIA TILLING TO A DEPTH NO LESS THAN 6 INCHES. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AFTER ANY RAINFALL GREATER THAN 1" ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND MAKE ANY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. AN INSPECTION LOG SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE DETAILING THESE INSPECTIONS AND REPAIRS PERFORMED. 12. PLACE NEW, ORGANIC RICH TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" ON AREAS OF DISTURBANCE. 13. PLACE SOD OR SEED AND MULCH ON EXPOSED SOILS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. SHEET INDEX A0.0 TITLE SHEET & SITE PLAN A1.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.3 ROOF PLAN A2.1 ELEVATIONS A6.1 PORCH DETAILS A6.2 PORCH DETAILS 2 S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS S1.2 FRAMING PLANS S1.3 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S1.4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 1 S1.5 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 2 S1.6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 3 & LETTER No.Description Date 6 Permit Comments 5/11/2021 UP A N A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B D C 4 TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TREADS3' - 2"15 ' - 3 "15 ' - 0 " 1 3' - 3"GRI DLI NE TO I NTERSECTI ON HOUSE1 8' - 2 1 5/32" 1 1 ' - 1 0 9/32"16' - 6"1 ' - 4 3/4"GRI DLI NE TO I NTERSECTI ON HOUSE4' - 1 3/1 6"65°65° COORDINATE DRAINAGE w/ LANDSCAPING CONSULTANT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK 3 ' - 6 1/2 " HEAVY DASHED LINE REPRESENTS DRAINABLE RIVER ROCK UNDER DECK - COORDINATE COLOR/SIZE w/ OWNER HOUSE CORNER TO GRID LINE 13' - 0 3/4" 877' - 4 13/16" EXISTING GRADE 18" SONOTUBES THESE FOOTINGS SEE 1/A6.2 • 10" SONOTUBES BELLED TO 16". T.O. FTG BELOW GRADE, SEE A6.1 • w/ 4 x 4 AC2 CEDARTONE POSTS SEE A6.1 P.T. 2 x 12 AC2 CEDARTONE 12 ' - 8 3 /8 "2 ' - 6 5 /8 "C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSGRIDLINE TO GRIDLINE AT HOUSE 16' - 9 15/16" GRIDLINE TO GRIDLINE AT HOUSE 16' - 6 3/4" HOUSE CORNER TO GRID LINE 5' - 4 5/16" FRAMING SEE S1.2 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 10/26/17 GENERAL NOTES -FLOOR PLANS 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING OR FOUNDATION WALL, U.N.O. 2. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR LOAD BEARING LOCATIONS AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR SECTIONS. 3. PLUMBING WALLS ARE TO BE 2 x 6 FRAMING. ANY PLUMBING WALLS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. MECHANICAL DUCTS TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM, U.N.O. FLOOR TRUSS MFG. TO VERIFY LOCATIONS. 5. ANY DROPPED CEILINGS REQUIRED FOR DUCTWORK WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL KNEE WALLS TO BE 2 x 4 FRAMING, U.N.O. SEE WALL SECTIONS FOR INSULATION LOCATIONS. SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 GROUND LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/2021 DN A KITCHENDININGOFFICEHALL DECK COVERED DECK SHED BELOW JOTUL GF 370 STOVE (BLACK)w/ BLACK REFLECTIVE PANEL. REMOTE CONTROLLED. STOVE PIPE TO RUN STRAIGHT. STEEL POST, TYP. SEE STRUCTURAL 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, PTD 2X4 FLANKING CEDAR MULLIONS TO ACCEPT SCREEN PANELS, PTD DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK STAIR: 17R @ 6 1/2", 16T @ 12" FASCIA TO BEAM CONNECTION 887' - 1 3/16" 887' - 0" IN-FLOOR WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE BOXES, TYP. PLACE IN JOIST SPACE. 7 THUS A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B B D D C 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISH C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSwww wUPLIGHT BK LIGHTING 'DELTA STAR', WIDE BEAM HAIKU FAN w/ LIGHT HAIKU FAN w LIGHT RED DOT GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET TH AIR VENT THERMOSTAT 2 A6.1 6 A6.1 5 A6.1 D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N N O V IS IB L E S E A M S N O V IS IB L E S E A M SwTH LEGEND REPLACE EXISTING CANTILEVER DECKING AND RAILING TO MATCH NEW DECK. BAMDECK 4G COFFEE N OPEN CORNERS: NO CABLE RAILING AT EXTERIOR CORNERS F L U S H EQ. EEQ. EEQ. EEQ. E3' - 7 5/8"GLASS HEAT SHIELD BY OWNER @ BACK OF STOVE EDGE OF DECKING 6 3/8" GRID TO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 1 Stove Location 3/22/2021 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 A A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 1 3/4" / 12"1 3/4" / 12"2 3 1 B D C 4 AIRVENT POWERVENT, SEE 4/A6.1 RIDGE VALLEY GUTTER SYSTEM AROUND ENTIRE ROOF, MATCH EXISTING DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK 2 A6.1 5 A6.1 END GUTTERS AT F.O. HOUSEEND GUTTERS AT F.O. HOUSE KICKOUT FLASHING BELOW KICKOUT FLASHING BELOW 898' -6"B.O. CENTRAL BEAM APPX. LOCATION EXIST. PLUMBING STACK DECK BELOW STAIR BELOW CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.3 ROOF PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 B DC OPEN CORNER, NO DECKING, NO CABLE RAILING. TYP @ PORCH EXTERIOR COLUMNS FULLY ADHERED EPDM ROOFING STOVE CHIMNEY CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM, MATCH EXISTING HSS BEAMS BELOW DECK MEMBERS, SEE S1.2 BAMDECK FASCIA AIRVENT POWERVENT, SEE 4/A6.1 DOWNSPOUT SCREEN PANELS, TYP. UPPER PANELS, U.N.O. SCREEN PANELS, TYP. LOWER PANELS SOLID MDO PANEL w/ STILE& RAIL TO MATCH SCREEN PANELS EQ. D 3' - 10 5/16"EQ. DEQ. D3' - 2 3/16"2' - 9 3/16"2' - 8 11/16"2' - 3 11/16"2' - 3 1/4"1' - 10 3/16"2' - 7 3/4"2' - 1"1' - 6 1/4"SEE PLAN EQ. E1' - 5 5/8"2' - 0 3/8"2' - 7 1/8"3' - 1 7/8"D3 D6 D2 D5 D1 D4 E4 E7 E3 E6 E2 E5 E19 1/4"2 2 3 3 1 1 DOWNSPOUT OPEN CORNER, NO DECKING, NO CABLE RAILING. TYP @ PORCH EXTERIOR COLUMNS FULLY ADHERED EPDM ROOFING STOVE CHIMNEY CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM, MATCH EXISTING HSS BEAMS BELOW DECK MEMBERS, SEE S1.2 SCREEN PANELS, TYP. UPPER PANELS, U.N.O. SCREEN PANELS, TYP. LOWER PANELS FASCIA-MOUNTED CABLE RAILING SYSTEM, SEE A6.1 CEDAR MULLION CABLE RAILING SYSTEM, SEE A6.1 CABLE RAILING TERMINATED AT METAL PLATE GALV. L4x4x10" ANGLE w/ 2 1/2 DIA. x3" KWIKBOLTS INTO FTGS & 2- 1/2" DIA. x 3" LAG SCREWS INTO STRINGERS STRUT, SEE STRUCTURAL FASCIA MOUNTED CABLE RAILING CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE STAIR TO DECK2' - 3 3/8"EQ. C EQ. C EQ. C 4' - 5 1/4"1' - 10 3/16"2' - 3 13/16"2' - 9 1/16"2' - 9 1/2"3' - 2 11/16"C3C2C1 C6C5C4 BDC EXISTING HOME SEE 2/A2.1SEE 2/A2.1 FOR SIZES 2- P.T. 2x10 4 x 4 P.T. POSTS AC2 CEDARTONE H2.5 TIES 2- EA. SIDE INT. STRINGERS 1- INSIDE EXT. STRINGER ACE 6 CAPS BD EXISTING HOME SEE STRUCTURAL & A6.1 FOR FLOOR ASSEMBLY CUSTOM WOOD DOOR w SCREEN PANELS SOLID MDO PANEL w/ STILE& RAIL TO MATCH EZ PORCH TRANSOMS DOWNSPOUT TYP. LOWER PANELS6' - 9"EQ. A 3' - 10 5/16"EQ. A EQ. A ALIGN NON-STRUCTURAL BEAM w/ EXISTING FASCIA EQ. B 3' - 4 7/8"EQ. B2' - 11"1' - 4 1/16"1' - 0 1/4"MDO PANEL3' - 2 5/8"2' - 9 9/16"2' - 9 1/16"2' - 3 15/16"2' - 3 7/16"1' - 10 5/16"1' - 9 1/8"1' - 4 9/16"11 3/4"7 1/4"A1 A6 A2 A5 A3 A4 B1 B4 B2 B3 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A2.1 ELEVATIONS 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 West Elevation SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"3 South Elevation SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"4 East Elevation Deck SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Elevation Porch NOTE: SCREEN WALLS ARE NOT SHOWN. SEE PLANS AND SECTIONS FOR DETAILS. No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 CENTER OF COLUMNS 2 4 2 42102 42 4 2x4 CONTINUES AT TOP & BOTTOM FOR EZE-BREEZE FLANGE SUPPORT FLANGE LOCATION OF EZE-BREEZE PANEL (OUTSIDE MOUNT) VARIES 2 10 2 4 2 4 VARIESD 3 CABLE RAILING TERMINATED AT 3" x 3/8" WELDED METAL PLATE 4' - 3 1/2" TALL BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARD AROUND DECK PERIMETER BAMDECK 4G DECKING CABLE RAILING 2x4 @ BOTTOM 2222222222 22 OPTION: FLANGE TRIM 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, MITERED AT INTERIOR UNINTERRUPTED HSS COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURALCENTER OF COLUMNS2x2 @ BOTTOM FLOOR OUTLET, LOCATED PER PLAN DASHES INDICATE EZ-PORCH UNITS HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURALCENTER OF COLUMNSD 2 422 2 422 VERTICAL 3-TRACKN.T.S.NON-STRUCTURAL BEAM w/ CEDAR TRIM EA. SIDE, VERIFY DEPTH OF EXISTING HOUSE FASCIA. TRIM PTD TO MATCH EZ PORCH 2x4 CONTINUES AT CEDAR MULLIONS FOR EZ PORCH UNIT FLANGE SUPPORT FLANGE LOCATION OF EZE-BREEZE PANEL (OUTSIDE MOUNT) 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, CONTINUOUS TO FASCIA TRD 2x SEE STRUCTURAL BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD 6 3/8" x 3/8" BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARD AROUND DECK PERIMETER BAMDECK 4G DECKING, COFFEE ALIGN HSS COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURAL 2 422 2 422 SLOPING HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURAL SLOPED SHEATHING FULLY ADHERED EPDM FIXED WINDOWN.T.S.2x FRAMING, SEE STRUCTURAL WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING IN 'SINGLE MALT' LADDER FRAMING WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING CABLE RAILING, ATTACHED AT METAL PLATE- OPEN SIDE NO CAP 210INSECT SCREEN BELOW DECKING DASHES INDICATE EZ-PORCH UNIT HSS HEIGHTN.T.S.FOOTING, SEE STRUCTURAL T.O. FTG 6" BELOW GRADE212212CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM: MATCH EXISTING ON HOME A L I G N 2 4ALIGN212 BRUSHED-ON MASTIC @ CONNECTIONS RIVER-ROCK OVER FOOTING GRADE 212212212R-38 CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION CEDAR TRIM PTD TO MATCH EZ PORCH HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURAL BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD 6 3/8" x 3/8" ALIGN CENTER OF COLUMNS3' - 0"EQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQSPACING TO MATCH CABLE RAIL AT PORCH (PORCH HAS CABLE AT 3' - 0")210WELDED FIN @ EA. RAILING POST 1 210HSS HEIGHTN.T.S.2 4 6 7/8" ENSURE MIN. CLEARANCE AT STAIR (C) FOOTING, SEE STRUCTURAL T.O. FTG 6" BELOW GRADE BRUSHED-ON MASTIC @ CONNECTIONS RIVER-ROCK OVER FOOTING GRADE GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET NOT SHOWN, SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION 3/4 X 1 1/2 POSTS 1X2" METAL GRASPABLE TOP RAIL WELDED TO POSTS SQUARE EDGE BOARD FASCIA 3x6 BAR 1 1/2" THICK, FASTENERS 4" APART EXISTING HOME REMOVE GUTTER AT EXISTING FASCIA, PORCH INTERIOR ONLY AIRVENT POWER VENT 'ASRHPGR' DUCT 'METAL SQUARE' GRILL BY REGGIO REGISTERS WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING CONTINUED FROM CEILING DIRECTION. DESIGN INTENT: 'FOLD' DOWN FROM CEILING COLOR-MATCHED METAL OVER ICE & WATER SHIELD FULLY ADHERED EPDM FLASHING @ POWER VENT PER MFR. LAP ROOFING OVER COLOR MATCHED METAL BLOCKING AS REQUIRED EXISTING SIDING TO REMAIN 210212282x8 LEDGER w/ 2- ROWS 1/4" x 3 1/2" SDS SCREWS @ 16" O.C. 3- SIMPSON LUS28-2 (DOUBLE 2x12'S) 2- SIMPSON LUS28 (SINGLE 2x12'S) SEAT CUT ALL BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARDS BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD OFFSET 3/8" 2 4 NOTE: P.T. AC-2 CEDARTONE FOR ALL STAIR LUMBER CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A6.1 PORCH DETAILS 24/02/2021 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"1 Plan Detail SCALE :1" = 1'-0"5 Section Detail Porch SCALE :1" = 1'-0"6 Section Detail Deck SCALE :1" = 1'-0"3 Railing detail Deck SCALE :1" = 1'-0"2 Section Detail Roof SCALE :1" = 1'-0"4 Top Stair Connection No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 RIVER ROCK OVER RECESSED FOOTING, SIM 5/A6.1 FASCIA BD @ STRINGER BEYOND STAIR TREADS NOT SHOWN ANGLE BEYOND @ T.O. FOOTING RECESSED FOOTING REFERENCE IMAGE SHOWING RECESSED FOOTING CONCEPT FOOTING RECESS @ OUTSIDE EDGE & FRONT (EXPOSED LOCATIONS) STAIR STRINGER & ANGLE IN PLACE OF POST & POST BASE CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A6.2 PORCH DETAILS 2 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"1 Footing Detail at First Tread No.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 STAIR FOOTINGS SHOWN ON S1.2 & A1.1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLAN No.Description Date FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION RUN COLUMN LONG FOR UPTURNED BEAM CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.2 FRAMING PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DETAIL T UPTURNEDUPTURNEDUPTURNEDNo.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.3 ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN No.Description Date SEE A6.1 FOR RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE SEE A6.1 FOR RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 1 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"A DETAIL A SCALE :1" = 1'-0"C DETAIL C SCALE :1" = 1'-0"D DETAIL D SCALE :1" = 1'-0"E DETAIL E SCALE :1" = 1'-0"F DETAIL F SCALE :1" = 1'-0"B DETAIL B Revised FOOTING CONNECTION • Please note that the center line of pier needs to fall within ½”of centerline of column. Otherwise, the post-installed fasteners will be too close to the edge of concrete. • May use the same fastener at detail ‘A’ as specified in the revised detail ‘B’.Only 4 fasteners are still required at detail ‘A’. SEE 'DETAIL B REVISED' SCALE :1" = 1'-0"G DETAIL G Revised No.Description Date 3 ASI 1 Footing Connection 5/4/2021 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.5 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 2 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"H DETAIL H SCALE :1" = 1'-0"J DETAIL J SCALE :1" = 1'-0"K DETAIL K SCALE :1" = 1'-0"L DETAIL L SCALE :1" = 1'-0"M DETAIL M SCALE :1" = 1'-0"P DETAIL P SCALE :1" = 1'-0"Q DETAIL Q SCALE :1" = 1'-0"N DETAIL N No.Description Date CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 3 & LETTER SCALE :1" = 1'-0"S DETAIL S SCALE :1" = 1'-0"R DETAIL R SCALE :1" = 1'-0"T DETAIL T No.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 06.04.2021 C1i Rendering Image RUBIN SCREEN PORCH: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE 8858798808828838848848788778768868868878668858798808828838848848788778768868868878668 7 7 ' -0 "878' -0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N N PATIO REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 380 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,038.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 26.5% PROPOSED OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 380 S.F. CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 06/04/2021 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN MAIN LEVEL FIN FL @ 887.1 100' -0" BASEMENT FIN FL 90' -9" GRADE AT ENTRY 882 883 884 885 886 ~877 -6 GARAGE BEYONDMAIN LIVING LEVEL GRADE AT EAST OF HOUSE 879 880 881 882 883883 882 881 880 879 878 BASEMENT w/ SOUTH WALKOUT DRIVEWAY BEYOND YARD 881 NORTH to BISCAYNE BLVD. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 4:02:22 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1ii SECTION DIAGRAM GRADE CHANGE 3/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/2021 RUBIN SCREEN PORCH C4: Neighborhood Bulk Comparison 6616 BISCAYNE BLVD (WEST) 6616 BISCAYNE BLVD (SOUTH)6612 BISCAYNE BLVD 6604 BISCAYNE BLVD6600 BISCAYNE BLVD (SOUTH)5721 LONDONDERRY RD (SOUTH) 5720 NEWPORT DR (SOUTH) 5721 LONDONDERRY RD (WEST) 5717 LONDONDERRY RD 6601 DOVRE DR (EAST) 6605 BISCAYNE BLVD 6609 BISCAYNE BLVD 6613 BISCAYNE BLVD 6617 BISCAYNE BLVD 6621 BISCAYNE BLVD 6625 BISCAYNE BLVD 6629 BISCAYNE BLVD 6509 BISCAYNE BLVD6505 BISCAYNE BLVD 5717 CONTINENTAL DR 6600 PARKWOOD LN (EAST) 5713 CONTINENTAL DR 6515 BISCAYNE BLVD 6519 BISCAYNE BLVD (NORTH) 6519 BISCAYNE BLVD (WEST) 5720 NEWPORT DR (EAST) 6501 BISCAYNE BLVD 5717 NEWPORT DRIVE (WEST) 5717 NEWPORT DRIVE (SOUTH) 5716 CONTINENTAL DR (EAST) 5716 CONTINENTAL DR (SOUTH) 6600 BISCAYNE BLVD (EAST) 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD (EAST) Dovre Dr Biscayne Blvd Londonberry RdContinental DrNewport Dr5717 5721 5720 5717 5716 5713 57176501 N^ 6505650965156519 6601 6600 6601 6600 66056609661366176621 6625 6629 660466126616 Before: front corner view of home, looking SE Before: back view of home, looking NW Before: back view of home, looking NW After: front corner view of home, looking SE After: back view of home, looking NW After: back view of home, looking NW proposed porch proposed porch proposed porch RUBIN SCREEN PORCH D1i: Visibility from the Road APPROXIMATED PORCH LOCATION -BEYOND GARAGE (DASHED), NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE VISIBLE FROM ROAD DUE TO PERSPECTIVE. SEE 3/A2.1 FOR ELEVATION, D1i FOR PERSPECTIVE 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD 6605 BISCAYNE BLVD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD.6600 PARKWOOD LANE APPROXIMATED PORCH LOCATION -BEYOND FOLIAGE (DASHED), ANTICIPATED TO BE BARELY VISIBLE FROM ROAD DUE TO FOLIAGE. SEE 4/A2.1 FOR ELEVATION, D1i FOR PERSPECTIVE CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 7:08:24 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH D1 NEIGHBORHOOD ELEVATIONS 1/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/21 SCALE :1/16" = 1'-0"1 North Elevation SCALE :1/16" = 1'-0"2 East Elevation We have been living at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. for 28 years. We fell in love with the neighborhood in 1993 and committed ourselves to rehabilitating the existing low-slung structure. The home was in complete disrepair when we purchased it and we had to live in temporary housing for a few months while the home was made habitable. Since that date, we have been good stewards of our home. It is intended to be our forever home. We are thoroughly rooted here: Our children were raised here and went through the French Immersion program until they graduated high school. We constantly updated the house with attentive maintenance. The reason we are asking for this variance is clear: we would like to add an accessible covered deck which would allow us outdoor use of our property while aging in place. In the past ten years, we moved parents passed away since that time, but we saw the detrimental impact of moving at an advanced age. Now, with the pandemic, we have seen where they were locked down and isolated from their families. We began to discuss what it would take for us to continue to live in our home for as long as possible. Karen turns 72 this year and Russ turns 70. Clearly, aging in place with one floor living was the key. Due to our modifications, all of our basic needs (bedroom, bathroom, den and kitchen) are easily accessed in a wheelchair. (Karen was in a wheelchair for 10 months in 2010-11 following multiple leg surgeries.) We decided that adding a screened porch and replacing our deteriorating deck via main floor access would allow us to leverage our yard and neighborhood as our mobility decreases. The 382 sf screened outdoor space would allow us more protection from sun and mosquitos than the previous uncovered deck, ensuring that we would not feel locked in our home when we go into the next decade or two. This would be the capstone to having a home that would make us safe, happy, and add to our health for the foreseeable future. If such an -evaluate our capacity to age in place in this home. We understand that there are community standards and rules. We believe our modest proposed project does as much good for us personally as for the neighborhood as a whole. We would consider this proposed enclosed porch the crown jewel of our property; the attached documents should prove our commitment and willingness to forego other site components that could add to our property (such as patio, swimming pool, tennis court). We have been good citizens & are dedicated to the community. Russ was Treasurer for Normandale French Elementary. Later on, he became Chair of the Edina Arts and Culture Commission. Karen has been active in the Friends of the Edina Library and is almost a full time volunteer for several community groups. We have loved being an integral part of this neighborhood and hope to continue this for as long as possible. Thank you for your consideration and for giving us a chance to truly make this house our forever home. Russ and Karen Rubin Before After 3. 1993 2021 Scale: 1” = 8’ 0’4’8’16’ Ndesigned by Kevin Kroen Landscape Architect American Society of Landscape Architects Rubin Residence 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Revisions Rear Yard - Landscape Plan May 2021 No.Date No.DateThis plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of biota LLC. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval from biota LLC. 3420 48th Ave N. Minneapolis, MN 55429 studio 612.781.4000 / www.biotalandscapes.com 6601 Biscayne Blvd SUPPORTED BY James & Mary Vandervelde SUPPORTED BY Les & Nancy Jones Support from Existing Neighbors 8858798808828838848848788778768868868878668858798808828838848848788778768868868878668 7 7 ' -0 "878' -0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N N PATIO REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 380 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,038.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 26.5% PROPOSED OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 380 S.F. CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 06/04/2021 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Existing Proposed 885879880882883884884878877876886886887866885879880882883884884878877876886886887866N SHED REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 (SHED REMOVED) (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 236.75 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 3,962.75 LOT AREA 15,251.3 25% WITHIN EDINA LIMITS OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 236.75 S.F.PATIO REMOVED877' -0"878' - 0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 07/13/2021 EXISTING AND POSSIBLE SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING SITE PLAN Without a variance... DN A KITCHENDININGOFFICEHALL DECK COVERED DECK SHED BELOW JOTUL GF 370 STOVE (BLACK)w/ BLACK REFLECTIVE PANEL. REMOTE CONTROLLED. STOVE PIPE TO RUN STRAIGHT. STEEL POST, TYP. SEE STRUCTURAL 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, PTD 2X4 FLANKING CEDAR MULLIONS TO ACCEPT SCREEN PANELS, PTD DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK STAIR: 17R @ 6 1/2", 16T @ 12" FASCIA TO BEAM CONNECTION 887' - 1 3/16" 887' - 0" IN-FLOOR WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE BOXES, TYP. PLACE IN JOIST SPACE. 7 THUS A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B B D D C 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISH C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSwww wUPLIGHT BK LIGHTING 'DELTA STAR', WIDE BEAM HAIKU FAN w/ LIGHT HAIKU FAN w LIGHT RED DOT GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET TH AIR VENT THERMOSTAT 2 A6.1 6 A6.1 5 A6.1 D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N N O V IS IB L E S E A M S N O V IS IB L E S E A M SwTH LEGEND REPLACE EXISTING CANTILEVER DECKING AND RAILING TO MATCH NEW DECK. BAMDECK 4G COFFEE N OPEN CORNERS: NO CABLE RAILING AT EXTERIOR CORNERS F L U S H EQ. EEQ. EEQ. EEQ. E3' - 7 5/8"GLASS HEAT SHIELD BY OWNER @ BACK OF STOVE EDGE OF DECKING 6 3/8" GRID TO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 1 Stove Location 3/22/2021 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 grill eat sit 06.04.2021 C1i Rendering Image RUBIN SCREEN PORCH: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE TRANSPARENCY STAIR FOOTINGS SHOWN ON S1.2 & A1.1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLAN No.Description Date 5 POSTS Scale: 1” = 8’ 0’4’8’16’ Ndesigned by Kevin Kroen Landscape Architect American Society of Landscape Architects Rubin Residence 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Revisions Rear Yard - Landscape Plan May 2021 No.Date No.DateThis plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of biota LLC. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval from biota LLC. 3420 48th Ave N. Minneapolis, MN 55429 studio 612.781.4000 / www.biotalandscapes.com RAIN GARDEN DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6601 Biscayne Blvd - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a proposed survey , site plan, and roof plan dated May and June 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The request is for a variance to lot coverage and rear yard setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to Biscayne Blvd, Londonderry Rd, and private property. Proposed site grading will maintain existing flow paths. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater precautions are not required for this work, as the proposed net impervious surface decreases. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control Perimeter control will be required during the project. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Public Utilities No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. Watermain installed and structure built in 1973. A well is likely not located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required . ~877 - 6877877 883 882 881 880 879 878 YARD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. 6600 PARKWOOD LANE DENSE ROW OF CEDAR TREES PROPERTY LINECHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS3/16" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 07/02/2021 TREE SCREENING BETWEEN PROPERTIES REAR NEIGHBOR RUBIN'S MAIN LEVEL FIN FL @ 887.1 100' -0" BASEMENT FIN FL 90' -9" GRADE AT ENTRY 882 883 884 885 886 ~877 -6 GARAGE BEYONDMAIN LIVING LEVEL GRADE AT EAST OF HOUSE 879 880 881 882 883883 882 881 880 879 878 BASEMENT w/ SOUTH WALKOUT DRIVEWAY BEYOND YARD 881 NORTH to BISCAYNE BLVD. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 4:02:22 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1ii SECTION DIAGRAM GRADE CHANGE 3/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/2021 NINE FOOT DROP Randy Anhorn, District Administrator 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 952-835-2078 ranhorn@ninemilecreek.org www.ninemilecreek.org When is a Permit required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District? A permit is required from the District when one or more of the following conditions are met: Rule 2.0 - Floodplain and Drainage Alterations □ Any alteration or filling of land and/or redirection of flow below the District’s 100-year floodplain. Rule 3.0 – Wetlands Management □ Any activity that results in the draining, excavation, or filling of a wetland regulated through the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), where the District is the WCA local government unit (LGU) (the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield). □ Projects requiring any District permits are required to meet the wetland buffer and stormwater- treatment provisions of this rule, unless determined exempt through WCA. Rule 4.0 - Stormwater Management □ Land-disturbing activities that disturb more than 50 cubic yards of material or 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation and: o Redevelopment of Single Family Home Properties: Redevelopment on a single-family home property subject to this rule as follows: ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by less than 25 percent, no demonstration of compliance with the criteria is required. ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by 25 percent or more and will disturb less than 50 percent of the existing impervious surface on the site, the stormwater criteria will apply to the area of increased impervious surface. ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by 25 percent or more and will disturb 50 percent or more of the existing impervious surface on the site, the stormwater criteria will apply to the entire site. o All Other Construction Activities: ✓ New development on a single-family home property ✓ Linear projects creating more than 1 acre of new or additional impervious surface ✓ Redevelopment: ▪ Activities that disturb more than 50% of the existing impervious surface on the parcel or will increase the imperviousness of the entire parcel by more than 50%, will need to meet the rule criteria for the entire project parcel. Otherwise, the rule will only apply to the disturbed areas and additional impervious surface on the project parcel. Rule 5.0 – Erosion and Sediment Control □ The excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of earth, or alteration or removal of 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation. Rule 6.0- Watercourse and Basin Crossing □ Any construction, improvement, repair or removal of a crossing or structure in contact with or under the bed or bank of any waterbody. Rule 7.0 – Shoreline and Streambank Improvements □ Any installation of a shoreline or streambank improvement, including but not limited to riprap, a bioengineered installation or a retaining wall, on a public water. Rule 8.0 – Sediment Removal □ Any removal of sediment from the beds, banks or shores of any public water. Rule 9.0 – Appropriation of Public Surface Waters □ The appropriation from a public water basin, public wetland or a protected watercourse. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jim and Mary Vandervelde Q2.Address 6605 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment We are fully supportive of the Rubins' porch and deck project. We've fully reviewed the plans and we are comfortable that it will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and won't cause any issues. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Esther Connor Q2.Address 6600 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment Russ and Karen are excellent neighbors who take meticulous care of their property. We have seen their plans and this would enhance their property and our neighborhood. We fully support them in their request to proceed with their porch. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Leslie ( Les) Jones Q2.Address 6600 Parkwood Ln Q3.Comment I live directly behind the Rubin's. I have live there for about 20 years. The Rubin's were living in their house when we moved in. At the fence line between our two properties the Rubin's have a tall evergreen trees that offer a lot of privacy between the two properties. I have looked at their proposal to add a porch off the main level and a ground level deck. I think that these additions to their house would be great for the Rubin's without affecting my property in any way. When we moved in we added a four season porch and deck off of our main level which has added a lot of enjoyment to my family over the years. I support their proposal for a variance. They are reducing the building coverage ratio and the 9 ft variance for the rear yard set back will not change anything for the Joneses. The way it looks is that the porch is encroaching the rear set back, not the open decks so noise would not be any more of an issue. I look forward to see the addition built for the Rubin's. I'm sure their family will enjoy the new space just like Nancy and I have enjoyed our porch and deck. Nancy and Les Jones DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6601 Biscayne Blvd - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a proposed survey , site plan, and roof plan dated May and June 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The request is for a variance to lot coverage and rear yard setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to Biscayne Blvd, Londonderry Rd, and private property. Proposed site grading will maintain existing flow paths. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater precautions are not required for this work, as the proposed net impervious surface decreases. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control Perimeter control will be required during the project. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Public Utilities No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. Watermain installed and structure built in 1973. A well is likely not located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required . 6601 Biscayne Blvd Rear Yard setback and lot coverage variance EdinaMN.gov 2 EdinaMN.gov 3 Site plan submitted for permit 4/21 EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 Proposed survey EdinaMN.gov 6 EdinaMN.gov 7 Proposed Existing EdinaMN.gov 8 EdinaMN.gov 9 EdinaMN.gov 10 EdinaMN.gov 11 EdinaMN.gov 12