Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-07-14 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAgenda Planning Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City H all, Council Chambers Wednesday, July 14, 2021 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeetings or Facebook.com/EdinaMN. To participate in Public H earings: Call 800-374-0221. Enter Conference ID 4164856. Give the operator your name, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta9 member will introduce you when it is your turn. Or attend the meeting to provide testimony, City H all Council Chambers, 4801 W. 50th St. I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Planning Commission June 23, 2021 V.Community Comment During "Community Comment," t he Board/Commission will invite resi dent s to share r elevant i ssues or concerns. Individuals must l i mi t t heir comments to three mi nutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same i ssue in t he int erest of time and topic. Gener al ly speaking, i tems that ar e elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Indi vi dual s should not expect the Chai r or Boar d/Commission Member s to respond to t heir comment s tonight. Instead, the Board/Commi ssion might refer the mat ter to st a% for consi derat i on at a future meeting. VI.Public Hearings A.B-21-17, A 36-foot front y ard setback variance for new home construction at 5404 Stauder Circle. B.B-21-20, Rear yard a nd lot coverage variance request for 6601 Biscayne Blvd C.B-21-21, 2.1 foot side y ard setback variance a t 5615 Sherwood Driv e D.Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Ov era ll Dev elopment Plan, Site Plan Rev iew– 4911 77th Street West VII.Reports/Recommendations VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Sta 9 Comments X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortabl e bei ng part of the publi c proc ess . If you need as s is tanc e i n the way of heari ng am pli <c ation, an interpreter, large-print doc um ents or s om ethi ng els e, pleas e c al l 952-927-8861 72 ho urs in advance of the m eeting. Date: July 14, 2021 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Adminis trative S uppo rt S p ecialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommission June 23, 2021 Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : Approve the minutes from the June 23, 2021 P lanning C ommission. I N TR O D U C TI O N : AT TAC HME N T S : Description June 23, 2021 Draft Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 1 of 6 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission VIRTUAL MEETING June 23, 2021 I. Call To Order Chair Nemerov called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Berube, Strauss, Bennett, Agnew, Bartling, and Chair Nemerov. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Olsen, Cullen, and Alkire. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Agnew moved to approve the June 23, 2021, agenda. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, June 9, 2021 Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the June 9, 2021, meeting minutes. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Public Hearings A. Continue to July 14, 2021: B-21-17 Front Yard Setback Variance – 5404 Stauder Circle Director Teague indicated this item is to be continued to the July 14, 2021 Planning Commission meeting. Motion Commissioner Agnew moved that the Planning Commission continue this item to the July 12, 2021 meeting. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. B-21-19: Sign Variance to Allow an Additional 38.2 Square Foot Building Sign at The Bower – 3650 Hazelton Road Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 2 of 6 Assistant City Planner Bodeker presented the request of 3650 Hazelton Road for a sign variance . Staff recommends approval of the sign variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. The Commission asked questions of staff. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Sean Sowder, SDDI Signs, introduced himself and addressed the Commission. The applicant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Berube moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the sign variance. Motion Commissioner Berube moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the sign variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein including adding to the findings that this will help the pedestrian experience. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. C. B-21-18: A 2.33-Foot Height Variance to Allow for a new 20’ 4” Detached Garage – 4628 Bruce Avenue Assistant City Planner Bodeker presented the request of 4628 Bruce Avenue for a 2.33-Foot Height Variance. Staff recommends denial of the 2.66-Foot Height Variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. The Commission asked questions of staff. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. John and Mrs. Tracie Rossman, applicants, introduced themselves and gave a presentation to the Commission on their proposal for a complete solar powered garage. The applicant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 3 of 6 It was noted there were two emails received from Better Together Edina in support of this project. Commissioner Agnew moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission started deliberation and discussion.  Solar panels are a great addition.  Support of solar panels but have not demonstrated the need for a 20-foot building. Need to have evidence to support the height.  Favorable roof pitch for snow removal so 18-feet should be adequate.  Not enough evidence to support the variance.  2 feet will not change the character of the neighborhood. Motion Commissioner Bennett moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2.66- Foot Height Variance subject to the condition that a solar system is installed within three years and based on the following findings:  The proposal and the use is appropriate, given that the solar panels that are proposed to be put on the garage.  Practical difficulty is the inability to locate the panels on the house and maintain those solar panels in the future.  There are taller garages that exist in the district, and this would not be out of character in the district. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion failed 3 ayes, 4 nays (Miranda, Strauss, Berube, Nemerov). Motion Commissioner Berube moved that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the 2.66-Foot Height Variance based on the applicant not showing evidence that they need the incremental height for either solar or for anything else and subject to the conditions and findings in the staff report. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 ayes, 3 nays (Agnew, Bartling, Bennett). Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. D. Conditional Use Permit with Variances – 6200 Interlachen Boulevard Director Teague presented the request of 6200 Interlachen Boulevard for a Conditional Use Permit with Variance. Staff recommends approval of the CUP with variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Commissioner Berube recused herself from this item. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 4 of 6 The Commission asked questions of staff. The Commission recessed at 9:29 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:34 p.m. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Joel Livingood, Interlachen Country Club, introduced himself and addressed the Commission. The applicant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing It was noted there were 134 responses on Better Together with the majority of the responses being against this proposal. Mr. Robert Frimerman, 6229 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Commission and stated he was against this proposal. Mr. Frank Thomas, 505 John Street, addressed the Commission and stated he was against the proposal. Mr. Eric Ryan, 513 John Street, addressed the Commission and indicated he was against the proposal. Ms. Debra Frimerman, 6229 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Commission and was against this proposal. Ms. Christine Hyland Lamson, 509 John Street, addressed the Commission and stated she was against the proposal. Mr. David Brockway, 6301 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained she was against the proposal. Ms. Connie Brockway, 6301 Maloney Avenue, addressed the Commission and indicated she was against the proposal. Mr. Jeffrey Coleman, 6313 Waterman Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained he was against this proposal. Ms. Ayanna Coleman, 6313 Waterman Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained she was against this proposal. Commissioner Agnew moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 5 of 6 The Commission started deliberation and discussion.  Would like to see more creative approaches to meeting the transportation needs of employees  Concerned with putting in a parking area that would potentially impact the neighborhood  Liked the idea of adding in a gate  Cannot support adding parking  Does not meet the goals of the Comprehensive Plan  Paving the area for a very limited use which goes against sustainability and climate change  Concerned about doing something that is different than what is in the Comprehensive Plan  Comprehensive Plan should be amended if this were approved Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. Motion Commissioner Agnew moved that the Planning Commission recommend denial to the City Council of the Conditional Use Permit with Variances based on the following findings:  Does not meet the Conditional Use Permit based on the health, safety, and welfare  This project is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Goals to protect single family homes  The current Comprehensive Plan designation for the residential lots is Low Density Residential, which is not consistent with the rest of the golf course. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion failed 3 ayes, 3 nays (Strauss, Bennett, Nemerov). Director Teague indicated on a split vote staff has and can send it forward to the City Council unless another motion is made. City Attorney Kendall indicated the tied vote can move forward to the City Council and no action has been taken on the CUP. He explained the Commission may want to make a motion to approve with a tie to send forward to the City Council, which is better than a motion to deny. Commissioner Strauss moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Conditional Use Permit with Variances as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. Motion failed 2 ayes, 4 nays (Agnew, Bartling, Miranda, Nemerov). Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. VI. Chair and Member Comments Received VII. Staff Comments Recieved Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2021 Page 6 of 6 VIII. Adjournment Commissioner Berube moved to adjourn the June 23, 2021, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 11:25 PM. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: July 14, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:Kris Aaker, As s is tant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-17, A 36-foot front yard s etb ac k varianc e for new home cons tructio n at 5404 S taud er C irc le. Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : Approve the variance as submitted. I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he application is for a 36-foot front yard setback variance for a new home to be built at 5404 S tauder C ircle. T he applicant is proposing to rebuild on the lot with a new one-story home with an attached three car garage in approximately the same location as the original home. T he former home did not meet the required front yard setback along S tauder C ircle with a setback of 79 feet provided from the east/front property. T he AT TAC HME N T S : Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 7-8-21 Noon Staff Report Site Location Narrative Survey Plans Engineering Memo Engineering Memo Updated 7/13 Soil tes ting Engineering letter 6/21 Engineering MBR Letter Engineering Letter 6/25 Applicant Pres entation Staff Pres entation Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 07 July 2021 Public Hearing Comments-5404 Stauder Cir Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 36 foot front yard setback variance for a new home at 5404 Stauder Circle VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 2 RESPONSES 2 1 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jun 03, 2021 08:11:15 am Last Seen:Jun 03, 2021 08:11:15 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Wade Kram Q2.Address 5409 Londonderry Rd Q3.Comment We have no problem with the requested setback variance Respondent No:2 Login:Liz Olson Email:lkolson@EdinaMN.gov Responded At:Jun 03, 2021 10:11:45 am Last Seen:Jul 08, 2021 20:17:04 pm IP Address:156.142.13.110 Q1.First and Last Name Diane Sillik Q2.Address 5400 Londonderry Road Q3.Comment Our names are Robert Ulrich and Diane Sillik. We are fine with the plan for the new rebuild which is next door to us. We think it will be an addition to the neighborhood. (Received by Liz Olson, City Staff prior June 3rd at Noon). June 9, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-21-7, A 36-foot front yard setback variance for new home construction at 5404 Stauder Circle. Information / Background: The application is for a 36-foot front yard setback variance for a new home to be built at 5404 Stauder Circle. The applicant is proposing to rebuild on the lot with a new one-story home with an attached three car garage in approximately the same location as the original home. The former home did not meet the required front yard setback along Stauder Circle with a setback of 79 feet provided from the east/front property. The required front yard setback is based on the average front yard setback of the homes located on either side of the property which is 115 feet. The subject property is approximately 45,758 square feet in area, sloping down towards a water body in the rear yard. A variance is considered to allow the new home to be built in approximately the same location as the existing home. The existing house is one of only three dwellings on Stauder Circle, so the front setback requirement for 5404 Stauder is the average front setback of the other two dwellings. The front setback of 5408 Stauder is 156'-2" and the front setback of 5416 Stauder is 75'-7 3/8", resulting in an average setback of 115'-11". The existing dwelling on 5404 Stauder is set back 79'-3/8", which is less than the average setback, so the existing front setback is legally nonconforming. The buildable area of the lot is also impacted by a 50- foot setback from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) line of Lake Harmony, which runs along the rear of the lot, and the 100-year floodplain. The required 115-foot front yard setback bisects the location of the proposed home and former home. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Residential homes; zoned and guided low- med. density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 45,758 square foot lot is located on the west side of Stauder Circle. The property is currently occupied by a rambler with an attached garage. The lot backs up to a water body. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in a memorandum. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed South Side – North Side - Front– Rear/Pond– 10 feet 10 feet 115 feet 25/50 feet 14.6 feet 37.5 feet *79 feet 50 feet Building Coverage 25% 15.5% Building Height 40 feet Less than 20 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: STAFF REPORT Page 3 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning standards, with exception of matching the nonconforming front yard setback. The practical difficulty is that the previous home on the lot is nonconforming regarding front yard setback. The location of adjacent homes on either side creates design challenges for the lot. The 50 ft setback required from the water body and flood requirements impact how far the home may be set back into the lot. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The previous home had an existing non-conforming front yard setback along Stauder Circle, even at 79 feet. The proposed new home is within the non-conforming footprint of the previous home and will not be any closer to the front lot line than the previous home. The home to the south is much farther back from the street than most homes near-by, impacting the subject property. The lot creates a challenge for home placement given the required front yard setback and minimum 50-foot setback from the water body. The elevation of the 100-year floodplain, existing trees and the topography of the lot, which slopes down toward the pond, impact the site design and placement of the house and other structures. These circumstances create practical difficulty in keeping the lowest level of all structures at least 2 feet above the 100-year flood elevation because, as the siting of the house and terrace area is pushed further toward the rear of the lot, more fill is required to maintain that minimum elevation. There is concern by the applicant that the extension of fill toward the rear and south sides of the lot could adversely impact two, large oak trees. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The applicants are hoping to compliment the neighborhood with a home that fits the unique lot and surrounding properties. The proposed project would also be one-story, single-family home. Designed to be unassuming from the street side, the home will be set into the existing hillside and open towards the lake and existing prominent oaks with a walk-out and outdoor space at the lower level. Recommended Action: Approve a 79-foot front yard setback variance for 5404 Stauder Circle. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: • Survey date stamped, June 28, 2021. • Elevations and building plans date stamped, June 28, 2021. • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Deadline for a city decision September 4, 2021. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 5404 S tauder Circle May 24, 2 021 1 in = 188 f t / CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 28, 2021 VARIANCE APPLICATION 5404 Stauder Circle, Edina, MN 55436 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND VARIANCE REQUEST PKA Architecture is working with the owners of 5404 Stauder Circle to design a new home to replace an existing one-story, single-family dwelling that was built in 1951. The proposed project would also be one-story, single-family home. Designed to be inviting and unassuming from the street side, the home will be nestled into the existing hillside and open towards the lake and existing prominent oaks with a walk-out and outdoor space at the lower level. The design allows for both levels of the home to enjoy ample sunlight, wonderful views the surrounding landscape and access to outdoor amenities. With an eye towards retiring in the near-future, the homeowners are excited to start their next chapter in this home and the neighborhood. The existing house is one of only three dwellings on Stauder Circle, so the front setback requirement for 5404 Stauder is the average front setback of the other two dwellings. The front setback of 5408 Stauder is 156'-2" and the front setback of 5416 Stauder is 75'-7 3/8", resulting in an average setback of 115'-11". The existing dwelling on 5404 Stauder is set back 79'-3/8", which is less than the average setback, so the existing front setback is legally nonconforming. The buildable area of the lot is also impacted by a 50-foot setback from the Ordinary High Water (OHW) line of Lake Harmony, which runs along the rear of the lot, and the 100-year floodplain. On behalf of the homeowners, we are requesting a variance to reduce the 115-foot front setback requirement to 79 feet to allow the minimum setback of the new home to be the same as that of the existing structure. As described below, the proposed variance is needed due to practical difficulties because of unique circumstances related to the property and will be consistent with the intent of the setback ordinance and preserve the essential character of the neighborhood. REQUIRED FINDINGS The proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. The proposed single-family home is a reasonable use of the property and a permitted use in the R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The proposed 79-foot front setback substantially exceeds the general 30-foot front setback requirement of the R-1 District. Allowing a reduced front yard setback that matches the setback of the existing house is reasonable, particularly PKA. ARCHITECTURE W`.,"1,.-/ I sKAk'CI IC( Ni) I 1 ".."c CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 because the majority of the new dwelling will be set back further from the sirM1MA Phifi@RTMENT existing structure and because it will be set back slightly further than one of the houses (5416 Stauder) that establishes the increased front setback requirement based on averaging. The proposed setback will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the special setback requirement based on the "average front street setback of all other dwelling units on the same side of that street, between intersections," which for this lot, increases the required front setback from 30 feet to 115 feet. In addition to complying with the general 25-foot rear setback requirement of the R-1 District, the property is also subject to a 50-foot setback from the OHW of Lake Harmony at the rear of the property. The combination of the increased front setback and the setback from the OHW significantly compresses the area on the lot that meets all setback requirements. The elevation of the 100-year floodplain and the topography of the lot, which slopes down toward the pond, also impact the site design and placement of the house and other structures. These circumstances create practical difficulty in keeping the lowest level of all structures at least 2 feet above the 100-year flood elevation because, as the siting of the house and terrace area is pushed further toward the rear of the lot, more fill is required to maintain that minimum elevation. In addition to the impracticality of a design that requires substantial fill, there is concern that the extension of fill toward the rear and south sides of the lot could adversely impact two, large heritage oak trees. The proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. This "block face" along Stauder Circle is unusual because it comprises only three dwellings, including the proposed new house, resulting in the "average" setback requirement being determined by only two houses. In addition, one of those houses (5408 Stauder) has an extraordinarily large front setback of 156'-2" (see attached graphics). The resulting average setback of 115 feet is extraordinary. The combination of an exceptionally large front setback requirement, a 50-foot OHW setback and a 100-year floodplain all affecting the same lot and reducing the buildable area from both front and rear lot lines are extraordinary circumstances applicable to 5404 Stauder that are not applicable to other property in the vicinity and rarely, if at all, applicable to other property in the zoning district. The proposed variance will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. The general purpose and intent of the ordinance establishing a special front setback requirement based on the average setback of other houses on a block face is to require new construction to have a front setback that is similar to the established character of development. Allowing the minimum front setback of the new house to be the same as the 79- foot setback of the existing house will maintain the established character of development along this block face. In general, the front setback of the new house will be more in conformance with the average setback because the majority of the new structure will be set back at least 115 feet. In comparison, most of the existing house is much less than 115 feet from the street. The proposed front setbacks of the new house will be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 2 of 3 PKA. ARCHITECTURE I WWW.PKARCH,COM I +1 612-353-49201 2919 JAMES AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408 As shown on the exhibit illustrating the building placement of homes in the surrounding area, the existing and proposed 79-foot setback of 5404 Stauder is consistent with the vast majority of front setbacks in the neighborhood. The structure that diverges most from the general character is the neighboring house at 5408 Stauder, the house with the extraordinarily deep front setback that results in the 115-foot setback requirement for 5404 Stauder. Nevertheless, the proposed setback for the new home relates to its neighbor by setting the majority of the front facade at or greater than 115 feet from the street. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3 of 3 PKA. ARCHITECTURE I WWW.PKARCH.COM 1 +1 612-353-49201 2919 JAMES AVE S, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55408 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NIS PLAN, SPEER-ICON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY NE OR UNDER Sly DIRECT SIPERNSION MD THAT I AM A DULY REOSTERED PROFES9ONAL COAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 14NNESOTA LICENSE NO. MAY 4, 2021 DATE: PROPOSEI? POOL. (16540') t(WATER ELEY.L91L75) DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE SCALE - 1" = 20' 0 20 40 • • • • • 11 GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. • A temporary rock constnrction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of I to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that arc not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet_ Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and lithe piles or other disturbed areas arc to remain in place for mom than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A dtunpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. • Hit becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan arc the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Edina requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope assay from proposed building. (EXISTING HOME FIRST FLOOR = 923.80) EXISTING ELEVATIONS PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FIRST FLOOR (SUB-FLOOR) = 922.50 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 922.25 BASEMENT FLOOR = 912.25 GARAGE FLOOR = 922.00 AVERAGE EXISTING ELEVATION AT FRONT OF PROPOSED HOME = 920.5 917.7 \ INSTALL SILT FENCE 4917.0 Benchmark: • Top of manhole 917.4 PLANT TYPICAL RAIN GARDEN- SHRUBS AND PLANTS APPLY 4" WOOD OR ROCK-, MULCH AROUND PLANT/NOS INV=915.3-, I I ! - I- EXISTING SOIL 1_ I - I I-I '--SGARIFY 12" MIN. DELOW---'' SAND/COMPOST SECTION RAIN GARDEN CROSS SECTION DETAIL NO SCALE OVERFLOW-916.1-, i -1 r I !---- I impoR7ED FILL: 30% ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST/70X WASHED SAND (DO NOT COMPACT) WV=9138--,,,‘ Fr r I areietina RelaW909 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2 and that part of Lot I, lying Southerly of a line running from the Southerly corner of said Lot I, to a point in the easterly line of said Lot I, distant 18.00 feet northwesterly from the southeasterly corner thereof, Block I, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 6. While we show the dwelling to the south, the size and location of that building is approximate. We used an adjoining survey to show the size of the building and we located a few building corners to get the orientation of that building. If the building was not built per the survey the size and or location of that building may not be shown correctly. ,F04.0 *!on LI ,NON of Um Ad Ma INSTALL 0011BLE----•, ROW SILT FENCE 7. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. 8. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 9. While we show the building setback lines per the City of Edina web site, we suggest you show this survey to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback lines are shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this survey to design anything for this site. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. INSTALL SILT FENCE ‘8" N 338.19. E _ -977.014 920.01nr ' 5/ \--922.06r , 911.601 I.-RETAINING WALL '991L6hr I I 1911.0ble I ) DRAINAGE SHALL BE ROUTED TO REAR OF PROPERTY 1NTH CONS7RUCTED GRASSED SWALE 92 CITY OF EDINA MAY 0 7 2021 PLAHL.AL. DEPARTMENT &ma • Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsurcom X 921.9 ''..hySTALL SILT FENCE it?‘ 9210 OJ 4, C°) 9191 X 9194 ----INSTALL ROCK ClONSTRUCI7CIV \ ENTRANCE PER NOTES L=18.00 • R=53246 A 156'13" -Southeast corner of Lot 1. X 9233 7.4 77- - X 0096 X9092 °X910.1 :INSTALL SILT FENCE X 911.4 X 911.7 8928'40" • X▪ 912.3 9131 9fIX 910.3 9181 t 91704 ,__ 91701 :,‘,., 1 0,,,,, 911.5b 1-2171sotec.L - - -- - ---x-nor -1,-2 X 9151 X 915 PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN ' INSTALL----, !, (SEE DETAIL) SILT FENCE .- RETAINING WALL DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 101 n. /X917.3 5-6-21 ADJUSTED SETBACK CLIENT NAME I JOB ADDRESS SUSAN BACH BRET HARTLEY 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN LEGEND EITSTYNO CONTOUR .g..11:577NG SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CON7191/1? PROPOSED SPOT AZAVATION .91241N4O6 AFRO" - FLOE' S/LT FENCE/11/0 ROLL TREE REMOVAL PROTECT EVSTINO TREE (INSTALL OR4NOA' CONST. FENCE AROUND TREE DT PROTECT% PROPOSED HARDCOVER House 4,116 Sq. Ft. Rear Screen Porch 434 Sq. Ft. Front Porch 377 Sq. Ft. Pervious Paver Driveway 2,715 Sq. Ft. Bituminous Driveway 733 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios/Steps 3,069 Sq. Ft. Concrete Pads 83 Sq. Ft. Pool 836 Sq. Ft. Spa 81 Sq. Ft. Ret. Walls 363 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 12,611 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 27.5% (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) EXISTING HARDCOVER House 3,333 Sq. Ft. Paver Drive/Walk 3,391 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 828 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 81 Sq. Ft. Bituminous Road 201 Sq. Ft. Rat. Walls 47 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,881 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO 011W 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 17.2% (AREA OF LOT BELOW OM1 5,042 Sq. Ft.) (Existing Deck Not Included, Pervious Below) I PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE House 4,118 Sq. Ft. Rear Screen Porch 434 Sq. Ft. Front Parch 377 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 2,249 Sq. Ft. Concrete Pads 83 Sq. Ft. Patio Credit -150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED COVERAGE 7,111 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 15.5% (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE House 3,333 Sq. Ft. Existing Deck 483 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 828 Sq. Ft. Deck/Patio Credit -150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE 4,494 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 9.0% (AREA OF LOT BELOW OFIYI 5,042 Sq. Ft.) DATE SURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 DATE DRAFTED: MAY 4, 2021 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SURVEY & TREE PROTECTION DRAWING NUMBER 210730 JR SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SHEET NUMBER S I SHEET 1 OF 3 920 X 920.5 920 .92o. SF 0) 0) `c" r• i !.,.. .• ,!: -1,, Z."-, 0 r a L.r.. a u) g, a L • LUQ ` .1 I a t a 1 <> a . , . , . ,.. CITY OF EDINA a a .v.,., ..- %v.\ ,..... ., . -. . MAY 0 7 2021 , ,,› ,- , , , ‘. PLANNING DEPARTMENT LEGEND . CATCH RAW - - ME HYDRANT - POWER POLE . MANHOLE ▪ - TELEPHONE PED. ▪ - EIEG TRANORIIER • . WELL - RATE VALVE - wort POSE o -TREE FENCE UNE — S — SANITARY SEWER UNE —W— WATER UNE — G — CAS UNE - ST— - STORM DRAIN UNE —E— OVEINIEAD MTV LINE - CONCRETE SURFACE 2 5;6 DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAPING ORIENTATION & SCALE SCALE - 1" = 20' 0 20 40 • • • • • CLIENT NAME/ JOB ADDRESS SUSAN BACH BRET HARTLEY 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 VVeb yovAA. a dvsur corn I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SURVEY CR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY RE OR UNDER MY DIRECT 9UPER119014 AND THAT I MI A DULY REDSTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THEWS CF lE 7 OF IHRESOTA. Thomas M Boom # 42379 9 SEPTEMBER 25 2017 DATE SHEET TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY DRAPING NUMBER 171023 TB REV 10 - 27 DATE SURVEYED. SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 DATE DRAFTED. SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 SHEET SIZE 17 X 22 SHEET NO. S2 SHEET 2 OF 3 90).Z — X 909 2 40 X 9101 X 909 5 920 X 920 b Rea SF El P1 LEGEND EXISTINO CONTOUR FAISTING SPOT ELEPATION PROPOSED CONTOUR DRAINAGE ARBOR' - FLO" 5/.17' FENCE/DM ROLL - EXIST/NG' DRAINAGE AREA .1.0 PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA /11 ,-Benchmork: /' Top of monhole 917.4 4i7.4 ANNING DEPARTMEN SILT FENCE DRAINAGE SHALL BE ROWED 70 REAR OF PROPERTY WITH COVS7RUCTED GRASSED SWALE STORMVVATER REQUIREMENTS: RUNOFF TO RATE TO STREET/NEIGHBOR (SOUTH) & VOLUME CONTROL FOR RUNOFF TO POND (WEST) 1. VOLUME CONTROL - ONSITE RETENTION OF 1.1-INCH STORM EVENT OVER ALL ADDITIONAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ROUTED TO STREET/NEIGHBOR (SOUTH) & TO POND (WEST). EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (ROUTED TO POND)= 7,881 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (ROUTED TO POND) = 12,661 SQUARE FEET REQUIRED VOLUME TO RETAIN = 4,780 X (1.1/12) = 439 CUBIC FEET VOLUME OF RETENTION PROVIDED (RAIN GARDEN) = 580 CUBIC FEET 2. RATE CONTROL - NO NET INCREASE IN RUNOFF RATE FROM EXISTING TO PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS FOR THE ATLAS 14, 10-YEAR STORM EVENT RUNOFF TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY (EAST) & TO STREET (SOUTH). REFER TO STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TABLE. STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY OCAI FI 000 INIINOATION AREA' STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT PER CITY: PROPOSED STORAGE VOLUME (VOLUME BELOW ELEV=908.1) SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EXISTING STORAGE VOLUME WITHIN FLOOD INUNDATION AREA (VOLUME BELOW ELEV=908.1). • EXISTING VOLUME WITHIN ELEVATION 908.1 - 425 CITRIC FEET • PROPOSED VOLUME WITHIN ELEVATION 908.1 = 8.477 CUBIC FEET RESULTS: PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS WILL PROVIDE MORE THAN THE EXISTING STORAGE VOLUME WITHIN THE 908.1 FLOOD ELEVATION. 6" WASHED ROCK PLACE ROCK OWR GEOTEXTILE - - FABRIC TYPE IV. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE -- 2- X 2" W000 OR STEEL FENCE POSE .9' MAX. SPACING GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - OVERLAP FABRIC 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS WIRE MESH REINFORCED LAY FABRIC IN THE TRENCH FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH MTH , TAMPED NATURAL SOL DIREGITON_Of .1.31_1I4SEF-; NO SCALE EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP INSTALL Da/ea-- ROW SILT FENCE •••,s. 0 fool / ..1 d i / Z4'9 I / ,i 'f' .4, 1 4, / / ( / \ , ,O ^O / kl / / 119060 ho rev 90. X 9055) X = 906 , lot lha E2x r= :n . 4 0 1 ole Ma I Ir x...) )) ) I 11 TO1 BE REMOVED I I I I /I I I I /1 I / I ( i 1 I I I I I < f 1, I I -4-, - I gl ----- -14 ------------- +, -- -------------- ‘,. )) \ \ --- I ----------- 41 I /4r \ 1 I rErieing Redoing St's' coMing Reaming 11411 PROPOSED! POOL ...' 77 .. \ (16X40') I !°,(WATER ELEK=92(.75) 9 r..,-*-/ A' "i (... // I / I t 4.56 /1155 ... , l ' or. :•-- 992,19.01; 92201 . :, (91.9.7be 1,— ' - / I ,-RETAINING WALL #2.17-' i 1•1::::', ; , / I / ( PAYER 1 X 9101 ) 1 ) 1 PA DD I I '-RET AINiNG WALL I i r'911-4 —WINING WALL T 91,23be / \ -922.01,7 920.07m PAW; PA 710 444 • L, X 74.6 9 E 701 N 338.19-- N 7911'19 88° E 91. -..ES. /4 "75 , a° )‘' 4s, PROPOSED DWELLING 91. Goroge Soar 917.0 threshold of ti door 97.7. door 92.,18--7.1.- 9252 X 922,5 9 X 9112 917 Benchmark Top of monho/e 917.4 1.11,717A 917.7 \ \X 9210 9259 X 9195 9' ••••STSTALL SILT FENCE X9209 X 9231 --Sou of L 0, X925. --SOu of L X 92 OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS X 915.4 TOAST— ,,RETAINING WALL *NOTES: 1. RESULTS ARE DERIVED FROM HYDROCAD MODELING SOFTWARE UTILIZING ATLAS 14 STORM DATA. 2. TYPE C SOILS PER WEB SOILS SURVEY. 3. RESULTS CONFIRM THAT RATE de VOLUME CONTROL REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET. LOCAL FLOOD INUNDATION AREA: STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP ▪ - INSTALL SO- FENCE ...49 X wet X 9092 / --31 8928'40!- ▪ X 9123 9130 9170tmT 9151 -917.0he 915569 -k•359..SOJe.F._ • — 6,,,56,'X X 913.1 X 915•N"-PROPOSED RAIN6-23f r (SEE DETAIL) VI T FENCE --31 -5-- - X 912-3 9111 0119 172 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952)474-7964 Web: www.advsurcom DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 5-6-21 ADJUSTED SETBACK I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER IAY DIRECT SUPERVISICN MO THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL OWL ENGINEER LINDER THE LAWS Cf THE STATE OE MINNESOTA. LICENSE NO MAY 4, 2021 DATE: DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE 0 20 40 IN MI NM • NI NI CLIENT NAME /JOB ADDRESS SUSAN BACH BRET HARTLEY 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN DATE SURVEYED: GEPTEMBEN 21, 2017 DATE DRAFTED: MAY 4, 2021 9191 ----/NsrALL ROCK CONSTRUC770N ENTRANCE PER NO7ES CITY OF EDINA INSTALL SILT FENCE MAY 0 7 2021 SUPPORT POST ANCHORAGE-2 INPLACE SOIL SILT FENCE NOTE ATTACH FABRIC TO SUPPORT POSTS MTH RINGS OR WE ITES IN SHEET SIZE SHEET NUMBER S3 SHEET 3 OF 3 STORM EVENT El (SOUTH)(CFS) P1 (SOUTH)(CFS) 10-YEAR 0.71 0.66 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. DRAWING NUMBER 210730 JR CITY OF EDINA JUN 28 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE AFT! IrA,TION DATE: 06/2 8/2 021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT V N N FRONT SETBACK LEGEND 0'-0" - 50'-0" 50'-0" - 80'-0" 80'-0" - 110' -0" 110' -0" - 160'-0" N 7 V fEBNEIGHBORHOOD DIAGRAM 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 VNIO3 dO All9 1N3IAL1HVc130 ONINNY1d ..... __,,.. • .... • fo • we. • •_ •— — -I— // 411 ••• -- —r _ — --- • ft. , •• / II ¨· — • G--- I 1 I 1 • . • 1 1 I I • • • \ • 1 N • • I I • I 1 1 • • • I 1 1 1 • 1 )4 I( / I 1 1 • I I II 1 1 • I 1 I 1 I i I 1 1 1 I • / II / 1 I I 1 % I I /i t i 11 I 1 1 cl 1 I (I I / I I 1 1 I ) 1 1 I I 1 7 I I / 1 II 1/ I I_ 1 I III I I I I I -05'-10 3/41 -I/ / / I I i I I- 1 I 156.-1 7/8" / L i [ - I 1 7;5:g1,13" / s I I I IQ 010).II i /• I co Xi Iii uj < I •-x• % 1 CO /Cr 0 W Co I 0 I— 1 < / i 9_0 <I Ci- 1 1031.11 1 / I— icr , I I LU Cl) I— N i .`,-; col LIJI I •• 4- Ito calla 1 /4 J a u) Z I ' 1 r----- -- 1 • I 0 I so ¨ % 0 0 I .0 • I, I?'f._ XII '' • "It \ • v) Ili I w I v I • > ,5<- SI I • • I lI vs". "" • 0 • .< fuj • of• 0. sag 1,1 -- \\ — two 111001.- • 11 r)// N 76.75% of proposed residence is within the average setback as prescribed by the Sec.36-439. 100% of the proposed residence is within the setback of the existing struc- ture. VARIANCE APPLICATION STREET SETBACK DIAGRAM CID DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 STREET ELEVATION DIAGRAM © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE w it 34, 394. DN 41 SCREEN PORCH 0 z O =1 0 0 1E3 III I D DR SPA POOL — I MAIN LEVEL PLAN 3 /3 2" = 1-0" I FP TV (ABOVE) ENTRY 1 100 1 7 II, IJ LAUNDRY OFFICE NOOK W.C. 11071 HAEL 1 102 I BATH 119 1 CLOSET 1 105 1 BENCH — BATH C :11 =2. STUDIO / MURPHY BED 12,2 UV 464I!" MUDROOM BEI 21.912 KITCHEN MEI CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT N PRIMARY BEDROOM 1 104 1 ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE T is 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM UNEXCAVATED 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 POOL ABOVE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/2 8 /2 021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE LOWER LEVEL PLAN 3/3 2" = MECH/STORAGE CIE ARCHITECTURE UNEXCAVATED ® 0 FP TV .500. BAR I 008I r - BEDROOM 2 COVERED PATIO HALL [NTI SAUNA SAUNA 09 B/CH BENCH WINE O O O CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT I 007 BOOKSHELVES I UP • CAH . BATH QUEEN BEDROOM 3 =I • EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - KEY NOTES 4'.0" VERTICAL PANELS L:1 PRODUCT OPTIONS: ARCONIC - REYNOBOND AMERICAN FIBER CEMENT - PATINA NICHIHA - WALL PANELS TRESPA METEON SWISS PEARL O STONE VENEER 0 GLASS GUARDRAIL m PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING O RETAINING WALL • OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR O VERTICAL WOOD SCREEN D WALL FOR MECHANICAL SCREEN ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 El CITY OF EDINA JUN 28 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = r-o" VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - KEY NOTES M 4,0' VERTICAL PANELS PRODUCT OPTIONS: ARCONIC - REYNOBOND AMERICAN FIBER CEMENT - PATINA NICHIHA - WALL PANELS TRESPA METEON SWISS PEARL El STONE VENEER El GLASS GUARDRAIL PREFINISHED METAL L" FLASHING El RETAINING WALL El OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR El VERTICAL WOOD SCREEN ro WALL FOR MECHANICAL 'LLI SCREEN CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 II / EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1,-0" • / ,L VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE I=1 I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I 1 E-DRAVIING 2A.4n2 I I I • I I I MIAAkf‘f, • MMII 1 I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 i I I I i t I I I I I I I 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - KEY NOTES WA" VERTICAL PANELS PRODUCT OPTIONS: ARCONIC- REYNOBOND AMERICAN FIBER CEMENT - PATINA NICHIHA - WALL PANELS TRESPA • METEON SWISS PEARL ▪ STONE VENEER • GLASS GUARDRAIL PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING O RETAINING WALL ▪ OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR • VERTICAL WOOD SCREEN • WALL FOR MECHANICAL SCREEN CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 El SOUTH ELEVATION + GARAGE ELEVATION 1/8" = VARIANCE ApplirATtn," DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 0 0 - 1=1- 7) 0 0 0 1 I I I I I r I I I 1 I I I I i I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - KEY NOTES fl 4'-0' VERTICAL PANELS PRODUCT OPTIONS: ARCONIC REYNOBOND AMERICAN FIBER CEMENT - PATINA NICHIHA - WALL PANELS TRESPA METEON SWISS PEARL O STONE VENEER O GLASS GUARDRAIL M PREFINISHED METAL 'J FLASHING O RETAINING WALL OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR O VERTICAL WOOD SCREEN En WALL FOR MECHANICAL L_I" SCREEN ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WEST ELEVATION 1/8 " = 1'-0" VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 06/28/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE GENERAL NOTES ego LSI/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC 91a 91144 likagrAer.;1.21-4.- -1"Z • i t -Tr 11115; 11411-11AVIrew-mEtl. N rY" PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 '3 :1 POND OHW: 907.60 1=1 0 • \ / <-1-r 8.00 • / 0 / / Ci l 24. 924.831 TOS .• 7 „ BOW 919.50 TOW 91700 0 'dlr'-riuvA.ria; T759 'rr°Clr"'-)."6'-''Aa'r;dmrlirir4cCI,:V41P-T- 1°1%710 A'vimilir IPP- 00" BOW. 922 50 IA os, pro T POO. /2 , 7,/ , / ---- r; ) ) / I / ,' / / ..5' / : / / 1::) ! i / /X i / Q/ / , '' C3 / ,rk(-Z' / /11 / CY / / 1199 V' / _(...<5" .' A, \ M! A. A / / / 1 \--I / i --LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN •2.* .*' / ...,4z, 01 41 /4, ELEVAI7ON = 908.1 / / iti IP i i ' / '- --- - - /- - -- , / ' 1 ,, 7, ,-7 7 ,1 i / // I 8. 8 ," 8 8 8 ..--- 8 8 -PROPERTY LINE... I PI 91358 BOW • 914.50 91358 4_2_61, BOS _ 2.5% _ere • 119 41 I 1. I I _dill is TOS / NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE 0 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 GARAGE FEE: 924.50 -3 923.33 923 00 CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 8' 1E' 32' SCALE: 1 inch =16 feet 924.83 924 53 OB 1:0 1. SEE SHEET 1001 FOR GENERAL NOTES 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS 4. REFER TO SHEET L010- EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAYANGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ME TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTOR. 3. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. • SAVE AND PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE • SAVE AND PROTECT 3. EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY • SAVE AND PROTECT. REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK • SAVE MID PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6. EXISTING POWER POLE. TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 el. AUTOCOURT 2,71400 41. ENTRY TERRACE 363 00 4.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 al. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STARS 934.0041. WALKOUT TERRACE 1.1630081. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 el. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 12010 et AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.05 cf. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,755 RT. PROPOSED HARDCOVER I PROPERTY AREA RATIO 33.53% HARDCOVER1PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY VP17DECOVER I PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER 25% ALLOWED PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 et EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0% -1.17% C-TtItIDE-YARD SETBAd- 0 SI 4 I 1 -- IP 5.9 Z1 33, E. 117 ME.58 Ah 918t \ ; . , 92g.OSI. 0 • ewe. SID TOW: 927.75 BOW:923.75 924.0 /-4 14.1 Q. 4t 3 i 4 TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 1 612 345 4275 BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUOER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The devgns shown and 40,04514 here n indudng a7 techn,ca. drawees. graph co and specifications thereof. are plapnetary and camot be coped. duphcated or COnWerOdly evlo led. .n whole Or n part. v411041 the express Miler. perrnivon of Travis Van Lere Studio, LLC These are avaleVe for laded rev Av and evaluation by enls. consu tants. confractors, governement ageno es, and vendors only 'A accordance win Ills noble. 0 Copyright 2021 Trans Van Sere Stud o. LLC nghts reserved. I hereby certify Nat Bus plan, speofication, or report was prepared by me or under my Area supervivon and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Nchlect under the lens of the State of M rAesola TRAVIS VAN LIERE license no: 43725 dale. 6/2112021 NOTE: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Reel Denali otirn Date • ISSUEDFOR VAFUANCE 06 28 2021 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 Dra,, By BV.1 Date 5210121 Sca, SMee, L1 01 .1 PROJECT INFO: SITE ADDRESS: 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA MN LOT SIZE: SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION ZONING: SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: SEE EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION AND VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR PROJECT JURISDICTION: CITY OF EDINA MN OWNER: SUSAN BACH E. BRET HARTLEY 4639 FREMONT AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55419 GENERAL CONTRACTOR TBD SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: ADVANCED SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING 17917 HIGHWAY 7 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 PHONE: 952-474-7964 LOCATION MAP SHEET INDEX Sheel 4 Oill0 L000 PROJECT INFO L001 GENERAL PROJECT NOTES L010 EX/STING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS PLAN L011 TREE INVENTORY L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN 1102 MATERIALS PLAN L201 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN L301 ENLARGEMENT PLAN L401 LANDSCAPE PLAN L402 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PLAN L501 WALL ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS L801 SURFACING AND LIGHTING DETAILS L602 SITE ELEMENT DETAILS L609 TREE PROTECTION AND EROSION CONTROL DETAILS 1.700 SCHEDULES AND SPECIFICATIONS EU `11 O O BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE ISSUED FOR VARIANCE: June 28, 2021 PAVING HATCH LEGEND Vf%fil ASPHALT SURFACING ggi CONCRETE SURFACING CRUSHED AGGREAGATE SURFACING DRY-SET UNIT PAVER (HERRINGBONE) ;•:;Ual MORTAR-SET UNIT PAVER (HERRINGBONE) DRY-SET UNIT PAVER (RUNNING BONO) MORTAR-SET UNIT PAVER (RUNNING BONO) DRY-SET PAVING 11.11 MORTAR-SET PAVING VENEER STAIR MONOLITHIC TREAD LANSCAPE STEPPER UNIT FLAGSTONE SURFACING SAM BLANKET RIPRAP POUROUS GRASS PAVING SYSTEM TURFSTONE PAVER SYSTEM NETLON ADVANCED TURF SYSTEM SLOPETAME EROSION CONTROL SYSTEM PLANT HATCH LEGEND TURF I SOD PLANTING AREA Ell FESCUE SEEEDING - TYPE 1 SEEEDING - TYPE 2 GROUND COVER - TYPE 1 GROUND COVER - TYPE 2 GROUND COVER - TYPE 3 SECTION/DETAIL HATCH LEGEND CONCRETE ASPHALT STONE, TYPE) STONE, TYPE 2 STONE, TYPE 3 SAND MORTAR GRANULAR FILL COMPACTED AGGREGATE METAL WOOD DIMENSIONAL LUMBER (SECTION) PLANTING SOIL EARTH (DISTURBED) EARTH (COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED) CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Issued VARIANCE APPLICATION • • • • • PRELIMINARY PERMIT SET BID SET CO SET REVISIONS PRICING LANDSCAPE SYMBOL LEGEND SITE ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW POINT OF ENTRY Al' BUILDING STAR CATCH BASIN, ROOF DRAIN, OR AREA DRAIN EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSES SPOT ELEVATION DATUM ELEVATION SLOPE-AT-SURFACE / DRAINAGE ROW ARROW rye . *P013 PLD 8 8 E5 • 000.00 XXKXX LOCAL XXX XX LOCAL EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ORW • ) 0 011.41 0 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED PROPOSED NEW TREE NEW SHRUB NEW PERENNIAL / ANNUAL iR,JTh• GAS METER WATER METER 1111 AIR CONDITIONER UNIT TRASH CONTAINER GENERATOR 0,6 PUP-UP EMITTER OT WATER SUPPLY HOSE BIB SPRINKLER HEADS O® sR PLANTER POT SWING GATE +0- Si3( UGHT FIXTURES e EXTERIOR ELECTRICAL OWLET -S- EXTERIOR LIGHT SWITCH LANDSCAPE LINE LEGEND PROPERTY LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT SETBACK — onv — ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER — CENTER LINE SILT FENCE TREE PROTECTION FENCE FENCE, TYPE I FENCE, TYPE 2 — — — >> — DRAIN TILE 0 OA OVERALL O.C. ON CENTER O.D. OUTSIDE DANETER OUTSIDE 0 /JENSON OFD OVERFLOW OWLS OH OVERHEAD OHW ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE ORNM Oft/MENTAL P PA PLANTED AREA FAR PARALLEL PC POINT OF CURVATURE. PRECAST PERF PERFOFINTED PER, PERPENDICULAR PL PLATE, PROPERTY LINE PLYIND PLYWOOD WIT PANT POB PONT Of BEGS,/ NG PO1 POINT OF INTERSECTION POT POINT OF TANGENCY PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POLNOS PER SQUARE INCH PT POINT, PRESSURE TREATED PU POLYURETHANE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PUNT PAVEMENT PM PAVER OTR QUARTER CITY QUANTITY R RISER, RELOCATE RISER HEIGHT RAO RADIUS AS ROOF DRAIN BERM REINFORCING BAR RECEPT RECEPTACLE RECT RECTANGULAR REF REFERENCE REF REINFORCED, REINFORCEMENT REM REMOVE RECTO REQUIRED RET RETAINING, RETURN REV REVISION RO ROUGH OPENING ROW RIGHT OF WAY RP RADIUS POINT RT RIGHT TEED CT F. iT EC SOUTH SCHEDULE SECTION STORM DRAIN SHAME FEET SHEET SM LAR SEALER SPEOFILATION SPACES SANITARY SEWER ST STAWLESS STEEL STORM SEWER TA STATION TD STANDARD TL STEEL TRSCT STRUCTURE STRUCTURAL URF SURFACE, SURFACING Y. 5/WARE YARD YN SYMMETRICAL DI TR LK TSB TOP AND BOTTOM TBC TOP OF BACK OF CURB TBO TO BE DETER...WED SR ntREssoLo TOC TOP OF CURB, TOP OF CONCRETE TOO TOP OF DECK TOF TOP OF FOOTING TOP TOP OF PAVNG TOPO TOPOGRAPHY TOR TOP OF RAMP TOS TOP OF STAR TOW TOP OF WALL TRANS ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TSL TOP OF SLAB TVLS TRAYS VAN LIERE STUD '0 TYP TYP,CAL U MIL UTILITY V VAR VARIABLE. VANES PER VEHICLE NSF VERIFY IN FELD VERT VERTICAL VOL VOLUME w WEST 1*/) MOE, WIDTH WI WITH W0 WITHOUT WO W000 WL WATER LEVEL WP WATERPROOF. WSW PONT WS WATER SUPPLY WT WEIGHT BOB WATER YAW WELDED WIRE FABRIC YAW/ WELDED WIRE MESH Y YD YARD SYMBOLS ▪ ABS ANGLE ARC LENGTH /14 AT I CENTERLINE O DIAMETER • /SCREE * NUMBER. POLING I PER • PLUS/MINUS I PROPERTY LINE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NAP C • ISSUED FOR VAR/WEE Data 08.28.2821 PROJECT INFORMATION Ilya By Dale Sca'e She°, UI.: 6101021 NIA L000 LANDSCAPE ABBREVIATIONS TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO A H NORTH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE WA NOT APPUCABLE I/E.G. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IME. NOT IN CONTRACT No. NUMBER NON NORVAL NTS NOT TO SCALE BB BASSIN:a BURLAPPED BC BACK OF CURB BFFE HASEMENT ROSSO FLOOR ELEVATION BLDG BUILDING BOO BOTTOM OF CURB BOP BOTTOM OF POOL BOR BOTTOM OF RAMP BOB BOTTOM OF STAIR BOT BOTTOM BOW BOTTOM OF WALL MIS BETWEEN CAL CALIPER CAP CAPACITY CB CATCH BASH CHAN CHAMFER CIA CAST*/ PLACE CML COAL ENGINEER C.1 CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER UNE CLR CLEAR CLEARANCE CM CENTIMETER GNU cos CRETE MASONRY UNIT CO CLEAN OUT COL COLUMN COMP COMPOSITE, COMPACTED CMG CONCRETE CONTI CONOMON CONIF CONFEROUS CORM CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CMR CENTER CF CUBIC FEET CU CUBIC CY CUBIC YARDS 101 MEP. DEPTH DBL MUSE OECIO DECCUOUS OEMO OVICUSH, DEMOLMON OET DETAt DIA DIAMETER DIMS OMENSIONS DN DOWN DR DRAIN DWGIS DRAWINGS E EAST EA EACH El EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL ES EQUAL EQUIP EW vtiefr EST ESTIVATE ETR EXISTING TO REMAIN E.W. EACH WAY EXPOSED EXT EXTERIOR EMG EXISTING FON FOUNDATION F.F. FILTER FABRIC FFE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FG FINISHED GRADE FIN FINISH FL FLOOR FOB FACE OF BRICK FOC FACE OF CONCRETE POW FACE OF WALL FT FEET, FOOT FTG FOOTING FORK FURNISHING FUT FUTURE GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GEN GENERAL GENERATOR GEO GEO-TECHNICAL GL GLASS CLAMS H H.GHATEIGHT NB HOSE BEI NC HANDICAP HOOP HANDICAP, FLINDICAFPED TIDWO HAROW000 MOOR HAROVIAFLE HOW HORIZONTAL H.P. MGM POINT OR HANCIRNI HT HEIGHT 1 I.D. INSIDE DIAVETER ROOT DIMENSION IL INVERT ELEVATION IN NCH, INCHES INCL INCLUDED INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR INV INVERT ELEVATION ART KIST JT JOINT NOTE KO. MOCK OUT LB LENGTH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT POUND LB UNEAR FOOT LA LOCATION LOCH LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE LOO LOW PONT LP. LIGHT LT MMNT WRIT AIR IMNICHANCE MIS MASONRY MAT MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MECH MECHANICAL HERB MENBRANE MER MANUFACTURER MN MANHOLE MIN MASAI WBC MISCELLANEOUS AM. METAL ABV ABOVE AD AREA SINN AIM NM-RICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ADJ ADJACENT AEG AGGREGATE ALGA ALIGNMENT ALUM ALUMNUS A1100 ANCO2E0 APPROX APPROXIMATE ARCH ARCHITECT, ARCHITECTURE AVG AVERAGE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 6123454275 BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN Tne designs shown and described herein including al technical draining% graphics and specifications thereof, ate proprietary and cannot be copied: &pirated or commerciady eNilo ted, in *hole or in pan, GRIM the mgvess vinglen penriss on of Travis Van Lem Stud.o. LLC. These are airdlable for landed renew and evaluation by dents, ccosullants, contractors, government agencies, and vendors only in accordance Min IRs notice. O Copyrgbt 2921 Travis Van Ume Studio, LLC. NI rights reserved. I hereby certify That this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my Orad supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Nchitect under the laves PI the Slate of Minnesota. TRAVIS VAN LIERE kense no: 43728 dale: 612412021 -HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1 DRAWINGS/2 VARIANCE-SET/L00 NERAL NOTES 1. USE OF THE WORD 'CONTRACTOR' IN THE DRAWINGS INDICATES BOTH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS ON THE PROJECT. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS MD LABOR TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE OF WORK AS INDICATED IN THE DOCUMENTS. 3. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING THEIR WORK WITH THE WORK OF OTHERS. NEITHER THE OWNER NOR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION OF THE WORK NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE TO ANY CONTRACTOR FOR EXTRA WORK RESULTING FROM FAILURES OF COORDINATION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE f OR APPLYING FOR, OBTAINING, AND PAYING FOR ALL NECESSARY PERMITS, APPROVALS AND INSPECTIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. Et THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A COPY OF ALL DRAWINGS WITH THEM ON SITE AT ALL TIMES AND SHALL RECORD ALL MODIFICATIONS/CHANGES TO THE WORK ON THE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A COMPLETE AS-BUILT SET OF DRAWINGS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT PROJECT COMPLETION. 7. EXCEPT FOR ITEMS SPECIFICALLY MARKED AS SY OTHERS' OR NOT IN CONTRACT, IT IS THE INTENT OF THESE DRAWINGS TO DESCRIBE A COMPLETE PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR MUST THOROUGHLY REVIEW THE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID MD IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS DISCOVERED. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE FOR ITEMS OF WORK NOT SHOWN OR DESCRIBED ON THE DRAWINGS THAT COULD BE REASONABLY INFERRED FROM THE DRAWINGS IN PROVIDING THE OWNER WITH COMPLETE SYSTEMS MD A COMPLETE PROJECT. 8. EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE FROM A SURVEY PERFORMED BY OTHERS EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES MY NOT BE EXACT AS TO THEIR LOCATION, CHARACTER. OR NUMBER THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THE CONDITIONS OF THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING MD CONSTRUCTION AND FOR IMMEDIATELY NOTIFYING THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF MY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE DRAWINGS. 9. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN AND PROTECT ALL BENCH MARKS, SURVEY MONUMENTS, PROPERTY IRONS, LAYOUT STAKES AND OTHER REFERENCE POINTS ALL FINES AND REPLACEMENT COSTS FOR DAMAGE TO ANY OF THESE ITEMS THAT IS DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S ACTS OR NEGLIGENCE ARE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AT NO COST TO THE OWNER_ IS THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXPECT TO FIND TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, GAS. CABLE TELEVISION, AND FIBER OPTIC LINES, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, AND OTHER PUBLIC ANO PRIVATE UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR, IN COOPERATION WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY, IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY THE LOCATION, SIZE, AND DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 800 252 1166 OR TO NOTIFY THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AND VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION, SIZE, ANO DEPTH OF ALL UTILITIES WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 11, ANY RELOCATION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANY AND ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY COMPANY. INCLUDING FEES, BONDS, PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SUCH WORK 12. PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND SUBMIT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN COMPLYING WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE MNDOT ROADWAY REQUIREMENTS. 11 DO NOT PROCEED WITH ANY PORTION OF WORK AS INDICATED IN THE DOCUMENTS IF OBSTRUCTIONS. DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN CONDITIONS ARE ENCOUNTERED. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY ON HOW BEST TO PROCEED. 14. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND MNNTAIN A SAFE MD SECURE SITE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL, STATE, AND LOCAL SAFETY ORDINANCES. 15. UPON SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF PROJECT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING, A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION WITH THE OWNER MO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY TO REVIEW, CHECK AND COORDINATE THE SUBMITTALS THE CONTRACTOR REMAINS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ERRORS AND OMISSIONS IN THE SUBMITTALS. 5 ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH ANY WORK 6 SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN THE FORM OF BLACK-LINE PRINTS OR PORTABLE DOCUMENT FORMAT (PDF) FOR REVIEW. EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS NOTES 1. VERIFY AND STAKE ALL PROPERTY LINES MID STRUCTURE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH CONSTRUCTION MAINTAIN PROPERTY LINE STAKES, CONTROL POINTS. BENCH MARKS, AND OFFSET STAKES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. ANY LOST SURVEY MARKERS TO BE REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 2. THE LIMITS OF WORK INDICATED ON DRAWINGS, ARE GENERAL IN NATURE MO ARE INTENDED TO DEFINE THE GENERAL VICINITY IN WHICH THE SCOPE OF WORK EXISTS. ACTUAL LIMITS OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE AREAS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE SCOPE OF DESIGN INTENT. 3. THE CONTRACTOR MUST REVIEW THE LIMITS OF WORK WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO STARTING WORK ANY WORK OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR AS MODIFIED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WILL BE DONE AT CONTRACTORS EXPENSE UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR NOTIFIES THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE NEED FOR THE WORK IN WRITING MD IS DIRECTED TO PERFORM THE WORK BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNER BEFORE PERFORMING THE WORK. RESTORATION OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY PAVEMENTS. CURB, GUTTER, PLANT MATERIALS, TURF, UTILITIES, OR OTHER SITE ELEMENTS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK THAT ARE DAMAGED DUE TO THE CONTRACTORS ACTS OR NEGLIGENCE WILL BE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE EXTENT MD ACCEPTABILITY OF THE REPLACEMENT WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4. A TREE PERMIT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR MUST SIGN ALL PERMITS AND PAY THE PERMIT FEE BEFORE STARTING WORK MD MUST COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL GOVERNING AGENCIES IN PERFORMING THE WORK OF THIS PROJECT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MEET MD IMPLEMENT ALL WOES, SWPPP, ABS EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF CONSTRUCTION 6. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL WORK AND MUST BE MAINTAINED UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY IMPLEMENTED AND ESTABLISHED. 7. INSTALL SILT FENCING AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE LIMITS OF WORK AND MAINTAIN UNTIL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL IS ESTABLISHES. ALL SILT FENCE MUST HAVE GEO-TEXTILE FABRIC WITH STEEL POSTS. MACHINE SLICING OF SILT FENCE AROUND OR UNDER TREES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. SILT FENCE AROUND OR UNDER TREES MUST BE HAND PLACED AND FASTENED TO THE GROUND WITH STAPLES 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING THE EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SITE AND FOR INSTALLING MO MAINTAINING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WHERE NEEDED. EVEN IF THEY ARE NOT INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. a INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE BARRICADES, SILT SACKS, RISER PIPES, OR FILTER FABRIC AND GRAVEL) MUST BE INSTALLED IN ALL EXISTING AFFECTED CATCH BASINS PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL WORK AND IN ALL NEW CATCH BASINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CATCH BASIN INSTALLATION. 10. ADJACENT STREETS, ALLEYS, AND PROPERTIES MUST BE SWEPT TO KEEP THEM FREE OF SEDIMENT AND MATERIALS TRACKED, BLOWN, OR WASHED FROM THE SITE. CONTRACTOR MUST MONITOR CONDITIONS AND SWEEP AS NEEDED OR WITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SWEEPING IS INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 11. CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN DUST CONTROL FOR THE SITE AT ALL TIMES AND PROVIDE WATERING TRUCKS AS NEEDED OR WITHIN 24 HOURS NOTICE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. DUST CONTROL IS INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 12. WHERE DISTURBED SOILS WILL LAY EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 21 DAYS, THE CONTRACTOR MUST SEED WITH A TEMPORARY COVER CROP TO PREVENT EROSION. TEMPORARY SEED MIX MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TEMPORARY SEEDING IS INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 13 THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR SECURING THE SITE AND PROVIDING PROTECTION FROM THE WORK FOR THE PUBLIC ALL OPEN EXCAVATIONS AND OTHER HAZARDS MUST BE FENCED. 14. THE RELOCATION AND/OR PROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE COORDINATED BY THE CONTRACTOR MD ANY COSTS FOR SUCH WORK IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR EXTRA TIME AND EFFORT OR PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO WORK AROUND ANY UTILITIES. 15. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO REPORT ANY EXISTING DAMAGE OR FAULTY CONDITION OF ANY UTILITIES TO THE UTILITY OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AS, ONCE WORK HAS COMMENCED, IT WILL BE ASSUMED THAT ALL DAMAGE TO UNDERGROUND OR ABOVE GROUND INSTALLATIONS HAS BEEN CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS AND IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO MA/(E THE NECESSARY REPAIRS UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, CONTACT ALL UTILITY OWNERS AND MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR A FIELD INSPECTION TRIP BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CONTRACTOR AND REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UTILITY OWNERS TO CONFIRM THAT ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNERS CODES 1. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LOCAL CODES AND ALL OTHER GOVERNING AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 2. APPLICABLE CODES: THIS PROJECT IS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF EDINA MUNICIPAL CODE AND SUB-CODE REQUIREMENTS AND STATE OF MINNESOTA CODE REQUIREMENTS 3. VERIFY IF THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE SPECIAL REVIEW AND APPROVALS FROM THE NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT. SUBMITTALS / SHOP DRAWINGS I SITE MOCKUPS I. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS AND FIELD MOCKUPS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR FINAL REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS' PAVING, WALLS, FENCES, SPECIAL METAL FABRICATIONS 8 CONNECTIONS, SPECIAL FINISHES. SPECIALTY DETAILS, AND LIGHTING 2. MOCKUPS WILL ESTABLISH EXPECTATIONS FOR QUALITY NAD WORKMANSHIP. 3. MOCKUPS WILL BE SET UP IN A SECURED PORTION OF THE SITE FOR REFERENCE THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND REMAIN UNTIL PROJECT SITE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW, STAMP, SIGN AND DATE ALL SUBMITTALS PRIOR TO FORWARDING TO ARCHITECT/ENGINEER. THE ENGINEERS REVIEW IS FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE DESIGN CONCEPT MD GENERAL COMPLIANCE WITH THE RELEVANT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE ARCHITECTS REVIEW DOES 16 THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURB, STRUCTURES, TREES, AND SITE ELEMENTS NOT DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL ANY DAMAGE SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 17. ITEMS SHALL REMAIN UNTIL DESIGNATED FOR (011.11MVE OEMPtION • At EsvE AVIV T01.011 moos PM. KCMGS . 19,3F31 11? s V.▪ 1.110‘ VA. EFITIANFOI 1 / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVERED SHALL BES 1.5% 2/ PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF PLASTICIZER OR HIGH-RANGE WATER-REDUCER I / TOLERANCE ON AIR CONTENT AS DELIVERED SHALL BEE 1.5% REMOVAL. REMOVE DESIGNATION ITEMS SHOWN ON THE PLAN TO THE FULL DEPTH OF THEIR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18. VERIFY THE LOCATION AND DIMENSION OF ITEMS TO BE REMOVED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK. 19. ALL CONCRETE AND ASPHALT REMOVAL SHALL BE SAW CUT. EDGES OF MATERIALS TO REMAIN SHALL BE SHORED UP MID PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PRESERVE EDGE INTACT. REPAIRS TO DAMAGED EDGES TO BE DONE WITH CARE AND AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 20. ITEMS ENCOUNTERED BELOW GRADE AND NOT SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 21. SALVAGE EXISTING MATERIALS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. REMOVE SALVAGED MATERIALS AS INDICATED WITH CARE AND STORE ON SITE IF APPLICABLE, CLEAN ALL DEBRIS AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL FROM SALVAGED ITEMS AND REUSE AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 22 REMOVE DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM SITE. DISPOSAL BY BURNING AND/OR BURYING IS PROHIBITED. ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL AND DEBRIS MUST BE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF MY AND ALL GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION OVER THIS PROJECT. 23. RELOCATE / TRANSPLANT EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL AS INDICATED IN THE DRAWINGS AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. MAINTAIN TRANSPLANTED PLANT MATERIAL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 24. EXCAVATIONS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY SHORED, BRACED AND SHEETED SO THAT EARTH WILL NOT SETTLE AND SO THAT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS OF ANY KIND WILL BE FULLY PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE. ANY DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LACK OF SHORING, BRACING AND SHEETING SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR MD SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. TREE PRESERVATION 1. PROTECT ALL TREES DESIGNATED TO BE SAVED AND ALL HARDWOOD TREES 6 INCHES OR GREATER IN DIAMETER THAT ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO VISIT SITE AND VERIFY TREES TO BE SAVED. CONTRACTOR MUST REVIEW THE DRAWINGS AND ONLY WORK SCHEDULE SO THAT. SHOULD PROPOSED GRADES POSE A HAZARD TO A TREE TO BE SAVED, THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK IS NOT IMPEDED AND THERE WILL BE TIME TO STUDY THE ISSUE 3 WHERE EXISTING TREES AND/OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS ARE FOUND ON SITE. WHETHER SHOWN ON THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN OR NOT, THEY SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE OR UNLESS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO BE REMOVED MDIOR ARE IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. ANY QUESTION REGARDING WHETHER PLANT MATERIAL SHOULD REMAIN OR NOT SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL. 4 ALL TREES TO BE PRESERVED AS INDICATION ON LANDSCAPE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 6' HEIGHT CHAIN LINK FENCING. THE FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED AT A MINIMUM AROUND THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE FOR ALL TREES (SEE TREE PROTECTION FENCING DETAILS). THE FENCE SHALL BE FIRMLY ANCHORED INTO THE GROUND AND SHALL REMAIN UPRIGHT AND INTACT UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE. BARRIER FENCES MAY BE USED TO PROTECT TREES OUTSIDE OF THE MAIN CONSTRUCTION AREAS BARRIER FENCES SHALL CONSIST OF SAFETY-CAPPED REBAR POSTS PLACED NO MORE THAN B FEET ON CENTER WITH 4 FOOT HIGH ORANGE SQUARE MESH BARRIER FENCING, RESINET SUMO, OR EQUAL, ATTACHED TO POSTS. BARRIER FENCE MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE LIMITS OF THE DRIP-LINE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND MUST NOT BE REMOVED UNTIL FINAL LANDSCAPING IS TO BE COMPLETED. 5. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OR STORAGE SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTED AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE OR MARK OUT ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING LOCATIONS ON SITE FOR APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON SITE. 6 THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO WATER, FERTILIZE AND ATTEND 70 OTHER MNNTENANCE NEEDS OF THE EXISTING TREES AS NEEDED PER THE ARBORISTS RECOMMENDATIONS TO MAINTAIN HEALTHY GROWTH THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. PROVIDE 6' PROTECTIVE LAYER OF HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN CRITICAL WORK AREAS. SPREAD CHIPS USING HAND TOOLS ONLY, SUCH AS SHOVELS ABS WHEEL BARRELS 7. WHEN EXCAVATION IS TO OCCUR NEAR A TREE THAT IS TO BE PROTECTED MUST BE CARRIED OUT. DAMAGE CAN BE LIMITED BY ROOT PRUNING. ROOT PRUNING SHALL BE COMPLETED BEFORE GRADING HAS STARTED MD SHALL OCCUR BENEATH THE PROTECTIVE FENCING AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. B. ROOT PRUNING FOR PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE PERFORMED WITH A TRENCHING MACHINE PRIOR TO ADJACENT EXCAVATION COMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE THE LIMIT OF ROOT PRUNING AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. LIMITS OF TRENCHING SHALL BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY TRENCHING IN THE FIELD. DO NOT TRENCH FOR IRRIGATION OR ELECTRICAL WITHIN DRIP LINES OF EXISTING TREES. COORDINATE ALL TRENCHING REWIRED FOR UTILITY WORK WITH LANDSCAPE PLANS. IF ROOTS OF TREES DESIGNATED TO BE SAVED ARE EXPOSED, CUT OR OTHERWISE BROKEN AND DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. THEY MUST BE IMMEDIATELY ABS CLEANLY ROOT PRUNED WITH A SHARP AXE OR PRUNER. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF MY EXPOSED ROOTS THAT REQUIRE PRUNING PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH WORK NO ROOTS OVER 3' IN DIA SHALL BE PRUNED WITHOUT REVIEW BY ARBORIST AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 9. LIMIT SOIL COMPACTION BY LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AROUND EXISTING PRESERVED TREE CRITICAL ROOT ZONES THIS INCLUDES RESTRICTING ALL TRAFFIC ANO STORAGE OF MATERIALS FROM UNDER THESE AREAS. 10 ANY PRUNING OF EXISTING PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A CERTIFIED ARBORIST AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SOIL PREPARATION NOTES 1. SOIL PREPARATION IS CRITICAL IN CREATING A HEALTHY AND LONG-LASTING LANDSCAPE. REMOVE EXISTING TOPSOIL AND STOCKPILE ON SITE FOR USE AT A LATER DATE. 2. CONDUCT A SOIL EVALUATION OF EXISTING STOCKPILED TOPSOIL TO BE USED TO DETERMINE THE SOILS COMPOSITION, COMPACTION RATE, NUTRIENT QUALITIES, ORGANIC CONTENT, PH LEVELS MD WATER HOLDING CAPABILITIES. THE IDEAL PARTICLE SOIL MIX IS APPROXIMATELY 45% SAND, 40% SILT, 10% CLAY, AND 5% ORGANIC MATERIALS WITH A PH LEVEL NEAR SEVEN 3 PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM, CONTRACTOR TO PREPARE SOIL TO ENSURE A PROPER ENVIRONMENT FOR PLANT ROOT DEVELOPMENT 4 CONTRACTOR TO DECOMPACT SOILS IN PLANTING AREAS BY ROTO-TILLING, DISC OR RIPPING SOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12. DECOMPACTING OF SMALLER PLANTING AREAS SUCH AS PARKING AREAS AND AROUND STRUCTURES, MAY REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF COMPACTED SOILS TO A DEPTH OF 18' OR MORE MD THEN REPLACEMENT WITH NEW OR AMENDED SOILS. REMOVAL ALL DEBRIS 2' OR GREATER FROM NEW OR AMENDED SOILS. 5. WHEN PERFORMING SOIL DECOMPACTION, MULTIPLE PASSES ACROSS THE AREA MAY BE REQUIRED WHEN POSSIBLE VARY DIRECTIONS OF DECOMPACTION TO ENSURE ADEQUATE COVERAGE. WHEN USING A DISC OR RIPPING EQUIPMENT, IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE FINAL PASSES OVER THE ARE BE MADE WITH A ROTORILLER TO BREAK UP ANY LARGE CLUMPS TO MAKE FINAL GRADING EASIER B. AFTER INITIAL SOIL DECOMPACTION PROCEDURES ARE PERFORMED, SOIL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE ADDED. THE ADDITION OF SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED FROM SOIL TESTING CONDUCTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH CONSTRUCTION. SOIL AMENDMENT MAY INCLUDE INORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH AS SAND, SILT OR CLAY, WHICH HELP IMPROVE SOIL TEXTURE. ORGANIC MATERIAL SUCH AS COMPOST, MANURE, AND PEAT MOSS MAY ALSO BE USES AND HELP IMPROVE SOIL STRUCTURE. OTHER AMENDMENTS SUCH AS FERTILIZER IMPROVE NUTRIENT CONTENT MD SULFUR ADJUSTS THE SOIL PH LEVEL. SULFUR SHALL BE INCORPORATED AT THE RATE OF ONE POUND OF SULFUR PER TOO SQUARE FEET. 7. ALL AMENDMENTS SHOULD BE MIXED THOROUGHLY WITH EXISTING SOIL AN ADDITIONAL SOIL TEST SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE PROPER SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING, 8. DURING THE REMAINDER OF THE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, VARIOUS AREAS OF THE SITE MAY BE RE-COMPACTED DUE TO THE USE OF EQUIPMENT MO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. DECOMPACT ANY AREAS THAT BECOME RE-COMPACTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FINAL LANDSCAPING COMMENCES. LAYOUT NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ACCURATELY SURVEY AND LAYOUT THE PROPOSED WORK FOR CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY GRADES, LINES, LEVELS, DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH WORK. NOTED DIMENSIONS TAKE PRECEDENT OVER SCALED DIMENSION, LARGER SCALE OVER SMALLER SCALE, ADDENDA AND CLARIFICATION OVER PREVIOUS DOCUMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO LAY OUT PROPOSED LOCATIONS FOR ALL HAROSCAPE, WALLS, AND SITE ELEMENTS MD VERIFY LAYOUT WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. HARDSCAPE, WALLS MD SITE ELEMENTS ARE DIMENSIONED ON THE LAYOUT PLAN. ANY DISCREPANCIES OR CONFLICTS WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OR OTHER DRAWINGS SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY FOR CLARIFICATION MD/OR ADJUSTMENT, 3. FOR DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS, PROPOSED BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS AND RELATED WORK, REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS 4. WHERE DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED AS 'EQUAL,' SPACE REFERENCED ITEMS EQUALLY, MEASURED TO CENTERLINE. 5 MEASUREMENTS ARE TO FACE OF BUILDING, WALL FIXED SITE ELEMENT, GRID LINE OR DEFINED PROPERTY LINE IRON I BENCH MARKS. DIMENSIONS TO CENTER LINE ARE AS INDICATED. S. INSTALL INTERSECTING ELEMENTS AT 90 DEGREE ANGLES TO EACH OTHER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS WHERE CONCRETE FLAT WORK MEETS VERTICAL STRUCTURES SUCH AS WALLS, CURBS, STEPS AND BUILDING ELEMENTS. 8. PROPOSED SURFACES SHALL MEET EXISTING SURFACES WITH A SMOOTH AND CONTINUOUS TRANSITION AND FLUSH ALONG ENTIRE EDGE 9 EXPANSION JOINTS IN CONCRETE WALKS SHALL BE LOCATED NOT MORE THAN TWENTY FEET 120'.0' 0.C.) MAXIMUM OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 10. VERIFY ALL JOINTING LAYOUTS FOR CONCRETE IN FIELD PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. ALL CONTROL. JOINTS IN CONCRETE TO SAW CUT UNLESS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 11. LAYOUT OF PROPOSED TRAILS TO BE STAKED OUT BY CONTRACTORS ABS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD. GRADING NOTES 1. EXCAVATION, BACKFILL AND COMPACTION SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS. 2. PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM ALL STRUCTURES AT ALL TIMES. 3. ALL DESIGN CONTOURS AND PROPOSED ELEVATIONS INDICATED ARE TO FINISH GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ACCOUNT FOR ALL IMPORTED SURFACE MD PLANTING MATERIALS IN DETERMINING EARTHWORK REQUIREMENTS 5. GRADING OPERATIONS MUST MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION. 6. NO GRADING, STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS, OR STAGING IS PERMITTED OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK. 7 PRIOR TO ROUGH GRADING THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL TOPSOIL IN AREAS TO BE DISTURBED AND STOCKPILE ON SITE FOR FUTURE USE. EXCESS TOPSOIL MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AFTER FINISH GRADING AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 8. IF THE EARTHWORK FOR THE SITE IS ANTICIPATED TO PRODUCE AN EXCESS OF MATERIAL, THE CONTRACTOR MUST REMOVE ALL EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE SITE MD DISPOSE OF IT AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. 9. NO TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SEEDING MD/OR RESTORATION AREAS WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10. TOPSOIL COMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC IN SEEDING MDI OR RESTORATION AREAS OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE LOOSENED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 11 COMPOST SHALL BE MECHANICALLY INTEGRATED INTO THE TOP IP Of EXISTING SOIL BY MEANS OF ROTO-TILLING AFTER CROSS-RIPPING. GROUND COVER & PERENNIAL BED AREAS SHALL BE AMENDED ATA RATE OF B CUBIC FEET PER THOUSAND SQUARE FEET OF NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT AND 10 LBS. OF 12.12.12 FERTILIZER PER CU YD ROTO-TILLED TOA DEPTH OF 8'. NO MANURE OR MIMALBASED PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED FOR ORGANIC AMENDMENTS. 12. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY DIRECT ON SITE CHANGES TO THE GRADING TO SUIT ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS MD TO ACHIEVE DESIGN INTENT. SUCH CHANGES SHALL BE DONE AT THE NO INCREASE TO THE PRICE OF THE CONTRACTED WORK. 13. THE TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES, INLET STRUCTURES AND SANITARY CLEANQUTS MAY BE ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY TO MATCH PROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE STMDARDS, 14. STORM WATER ROOF DRAIN LOCATIONS ARE BASED UPON PRELIMINARY ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO MD FOR VERIFYING LOCATIONS ON FINAL ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEEDING NOTES 1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNERS WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 2. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS NOT SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATED AS STRUCTURE, HARD SURFACE, PLANTING AREAS OR LAWN. 3. THE SEEDING CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE PROPOSED SEEDING START DATE A MINIMUM OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDING. 4. METHOD OF SEEDING MD SEEDING RATE SHALL BE AS LISTED ON SEEDING KEY. 5. NO SEEDING MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS THE CONTRACTOR, PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR !NOTATION, REQUESTS APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. B. THE SEEDING / RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP NEWLY SEEDED AREAS WATERED FORA MINIMUM OF 4 WEEKS OR UNTIL SEES IS 80% ESTABLISHED. SPRING SEEDING COMPLETED AFTER MAY 15TH MUST BE WATERED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR AT LEAST 4 WEEKS, OR UNTIL AUGUST 15TH. WHICHEVER IS LONGER. THE SEEDING I RESTORATION CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A BID FOR INDIVIDUAL WATERING APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE TWO YEAR WARRANTY PERIOD FOR POTENTIAL WATERING DURING UNUSUALLY DRY PERIODS_ 7. EROSION CONTROL MATTING MUST BE USED ON ALL SLOPES GREATER THAN It 8. SEEDING IN RESTORATION AREAS WILL FOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN 'RESTORATION NOTES' 9. EROSION CONTROL MATTING IS REQUIRED IN RESTORATION AREAS SHALL BE INSTALLED BY THE SEEDING I RESTORATION CONTRACTOR. PLANTING NOTES EXACT LOCATION OF PLANT AREAS AND MATERIALS TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJUST PLANTINGS TO EXACT LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD. 2. VERIFY PLANT COUNTS MD SQUARE FOOTAGE& QUANTITIES ARE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. IF QUANTITIES ON PLANT LIST DIFFER FROM GRAPHIC INDICATIONS ON PLANS, THEN THE GREATER NUMBER / QUANTITY SHALL PREVAIL. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR QUANTITY TAKE OFFS AND SHALL PROVIDE FULL COVERAGE OF PLANTING AREAS AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS NOTIFY UMDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY PLANTING DISCREPANCIES. 3. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNERS WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. MY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNERS WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 4. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE THE DECOMPACTED SUBGRADE AFTER DECOMPACTION WORK IS COMPLETE AND PRIOR TO TOPSOIL PLACEMENT. 5. PROVIDE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN TURF AREAS. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF12 INCHES OF PLANTING SOIL MIX CONSISTING OF 1/3 TOPSOIL, 1/3 SAND, ANO 1/3 COMPOST IN ALL SHRUB MD PERENNIAL REDS WHERE SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS ARE GROUPED, CREATE ONE CONTINUOUS PLANTING BED. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE TOPSOIL PROS TO SPREADING. CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT TESTING RESULTS AND FERTILIZER RECOMMENDATIONS. 6. ALL NEW TREE PLANTINGS AND EDGED PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTH OF DOUBLE- SHREDOED HARDWOOD MULCH ALL NEW EDGED GROUNDCOVER PLANTING BEDS TO FLECEIVE 3 INCH DEPTH OF PINE BARK MULCH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE MULCH PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. ALL PLANTING BEETS NOT CONTAINED BY STRUCTURES, CURB, OR PAVING MUST BE EDGED WITH METAL EDGING (ALUMINUM OR STEEL). 8. WHERE LAWN I SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD MUST BE HELD 1 INCH BELOW THE SURFACE ELEVATION OF THE PAVED SURFACE. 9. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS 10. STAKE ALL PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS IN FIELD FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES RIGHTS TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO LOCATIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. 11. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE STAKED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND/OR AS DIRECTED IN THE FIELD BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL STAKING LOCATIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE DELIVERY DATE FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 12. PAINT OR STRING ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS MO LOCATIONS IN FIELD FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL ADJUSTMENT IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL MAY BE NEEDED IN THE FIELD, SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED (COMMON OR LATIN NOMENCLATURE/ WITH A PLASTIC TAG WHICH SHALL NOT BE REMOVED PRIOR TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS APPROVAL. 14. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL MEET AND CONFORM TO 'THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK', ANSI LATEST WRITTEN STANDARDS MD CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL. 11 AN INSPECTION TO APPROVE PLANT MATERIAL AT THE NURSERY SHALL OCCUR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 48 HOUR NOTIFICATION 70 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 16. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL OR OTHER FERTILIZER AS INDICATED MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS. 17. ALL PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 18 WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES FROM THE GROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE QUALITY, HEAW WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1ST, AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING BETWEEN MY 1ST AND JUNE 1ST, OR AS INSTRUCTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 19 IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PERCEIVES MY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS, OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT MATERIAL ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL, OR GUARANTEE, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 20. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND/OR OUOTATION. MY SUBSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TO APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 21. PROVIDE MATCHING FORMS AND SIZES FOR PLANT MATERIALS WITHIN EACH SPECIES AND SIZE DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL MEET SIZE AND QUALITY STANDARDS AS INDICATED IN DOCUMENTS AND SHALL BE OF TOP QUALITY MO VIGOROUS HEALTH. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT PLANTS NOT MEETING THESE STANDARDS. 22. ALIGN ABS EQUALLY SPACE PLANTINGS IN ALL DIRECTIONS AS DESIGNATED ON THE PLANS. 23. FINISH GRADE OF PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE 1' BELOW ADJACENT PAVING OR SURFACING AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 24. ALL TREES PLANTED ADJACENT TO PUBLIC AND/OR PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE PRUNED CLEAR OF ALL BRANCHES BETWEEN GROUND AND A HEIGHT OF EIGHT (8) FEET FOR THAT PORTION OF THE PLAN LOCATED OVER THE SIDEWALK MD/OR ROAD. 25 PRUNE NEWLY PLANTED TREES MO SHEAR NEWLY PLANTED HEDGES AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 26 PROTECT ALL NEW EVERGREEN PLANTINGS FROM WINTER BURN BY WRAPPING NEW PLANTINGS WITH BURLAP. MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. 27. TREE ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE TREES ARE PLACED WITHIN 5 FEET OF EXISTING OR NEW PAVEMENT SURFACES. THE ROOT BARRIER SHALL BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE TREE PIT CLOSEST TO THE IMPROVEMENTS DO NOT ENCLOSE ROOT BALL FOR TREES WITH ROOT BARRIER. 28. ALL PLANTING AREAS ON SLOPES OVER 4:1 SHALL RECEIVE COCONUT FIBER EROSION CONTROL NETTING FROM ROLLS. NETTING SHALL BE ACT-125, AS MANUFACTURED BY NORTH AMERICAN GREEN (OR EQUAL) INSTALL AND STAKE PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 29 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPON COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING WORK 30 PLANTING IN SEEDING MD/OR RESTORATION AREAS WILL FOLLOW PROCEDURES LISTED IN 'SEEDING NOTES' AND 'RESTORATION NOTES,' 31 CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ALL NEW PLANTING AREAS OF PROJECT UNTIL SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF PROJECT. 32 AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE IN HEALTHY, VIGOROUS GROWING CONDMON, PLANTED IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IRRIGATION NOTES IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN / BUILD. AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. LOW VOLUME EQUIPMENT SHALL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT WATER FOR PLAN GROWTH WITH A MINIMUM WATER LOSS DUE TO V/ATER RUN OFF. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL USE HIGH QUALITY, AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES, CONTROLLERS MO OTHER NECESSARY IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT. ALL COMPONENTS SHALL BE NON-CORROSIVE MATERIALS. ALL DRIP SYSTEMS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY FILTERED AND REGULATED PER THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED DESIGN PARAMETERS. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL Of SYSTEM PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 2. IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL OPERATE ON POTABLE WATER, AND THE SYSTEM WILL HAVE APPROPRIATE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES INSTALLED TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF THE POTABLE SOURCE. 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED MD INSTALLED, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT POSSIBLE, TO CONSERVE WATER BY USING THE FOLLOWING DEVICES AND SYSTEMS: MATCHED PRECIPITATION RATE TECHNOLOGY ON ROTOR MD SPRAY HEADS WHEREVER POSSIBLE), RAIN SENSORS, AND MULTI-PROGRAM COMPUTERIZED IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS FEATURING SENSORY INPUT CAPABILITIES. 4. ALL LAWN, PLANTING AREAS MO NEW TREE PLANTINGS WITHIN PROPERTY LIMITS MUST BE IRRIGATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NEW SEEDING AND / OR RESTORATION AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED SEPARATELY M INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 5. ALL NEW PLANTING BEDS, NEW TREE PLANTINGS, GREEN ROOFS MD CONTAINER PLANTINGS TO RECEIVE DRIP LINE EMITTER IRRIGATION, ALL TURF I LAWN, SEEDED AND I OR RESTORATION AREAS TO RECEIVE OVERHEAD SPRAY IRRIGATION. 8. PROPOSED IRRIGATION LAYOUTS MD MATERIAL LISTS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITH BIOS. ACCEPTABLE PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS INCLUDE RAINBIRD, TORO, AND NETAFIM. THE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SHALL BE SIZED TO ACCOMMODATE ALL PROPOSED ZONES, INCLUDING MY AREAS INDICATED AS FUTURE IRRIGATION, AND SHALL BE FULLY AUTOMATIC WITH A VOLATILE MEMORY CHIP. 7. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVES. IF ADDITIONAL SLEEVING IS REQUIRED, IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ONLY TRENCHLESS METHODS WILL BE APPROVED AFTER PAVING IS COMPLETED. 8. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM FROM THE POINT OF CONNECTION AT THE COLD WATER STUB OUT LINE FROM THE BUILDING. THE STUB OUTS FROM THE BUILDING, THE BACKFLOW PRE NTER, AND OTHER CODE REQUIRED PLUMBING ELEMENTS MUST BE PROVIDED BY A LICENSED MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. 9. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST INSTALL THE IRRIGATION CONTROL PANEL IN THE LOCATION INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS OR AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. COORDINATE LOCATION W APPLICABLE TRADES. ID THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE OPERATIONS MO MAINTENANCE MANUALS MO ON-SITE INSTRUCTION TO THE OWNER IN THE SYSTEM OPERATION. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INITIAL SYSTEM STARTUP, WINTERIZATION FOR THE FIRST WINTER, AND STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING. 11. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IRRIGATION COVERAGE FOR ALL SEEDING I RESTORATION AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATEDIRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH SEEDING / RESTORATION CONTRACTOR REGARDING IRRIGATION SYSTEM SCHEDULE ABS IRRIGATION NEEDS IN RESTORATION AREAS. IS. ALL SPRAY MD ROTOR HEAD LOCATIONS SHALL BE STAKED, FLAGGED AND/OR OTHERWISE CLEARLY MARKED ON THE GROUND PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SPRINKLER HEAD STAKING SHALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE OR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BEFORE INSTALLATION. STAKED LOCATIONS SHALL BE SPACED TO PROVIDE HEAD-TO-HEAD COVERAGE. 11 SET SPRINKLER HEADS PERPENDICULAR TO FINISH GRADE OF AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 14. ADJUST IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT FOR MY VERTICAL OBSTRUCTIONS OR INTERFERENCE. DO NOT OVERSPRAY ONTO WALKS, ROADWAYS, WALLS, FENCES MD / OR BUILDING STRUCTURES 15. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE BASED ON MINIMUM PRESSURE AND MAXIMUM FLOW DEMAND. VERIFY WATER PRESSURE BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION. REPORT MY DIFFERENCES IN WATER PRESSURE READINGS AT IRRIGATION POINT OF CONNECTION PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 16. IF EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS TO BE RETAINED FOR REUSE, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE ALL REQUIRED ADDITIONS TO EXISTING SYSTEM NECESSARY TO OBTAIN FULL COVERAGE OF ALL LANDSCAPE WORK AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS AND PROVIDE A DESIGN BUILD DRAWING IDENTIFYING DUSTING MD PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS FOR INSTALLATION. 17, PROVIDE AS-BUILT DRAWING OF FINAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO OWNER I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THEIR RECORDS. UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM, IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: • ACCURATE AND COMPLETE 'AS war PLANS OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING &1/2.01. ZONE MAP TO BE PLACED INSIDE EACH CONTROLLER BOX A LOG ON ALL WATER WINDOWS, RUN SCHEDULE TIMES, AND OTHER CHANGES AND/OR MODIFICATIONS TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SINCE INSTALLATION. ONE HOUR OF TRAINING TO OWNER ON IRRIGATION SYSTEM MD CONTROLLER OPERATION. THREE OF EACH TYPE Of HEAD AND EMITTER INSTALLED. ONE OF EACH TYPE OF VALVE INSTALLED. REVIEW WINTERIZATION PROCEDURES FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM WITH OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. SITE LIGHTING NOTES 1. THE LIGHTING PLAN IS INTENDED TO SHOW THE LOCATIONS AND TYPE OF LUMINNRE FIXTURES ONLY. POWER SYSTEMS, CONDUIT, WIRING, VOLTAGES AND OTHER ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING TYPES SHALL CONSIST PRIMARILY OF LOW VOLTAGE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL LANDSCAPE LIGHTING MO THEIR COMPONENTS SHALL MEET THE UL1838 GOVERNING STANDARDS. 3. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LIGHTING LOCATIONS THAT CONFLICT WITH DRAINAGE, UTILITIES OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 4 COORDINATE PROPOSED POWER SOURCES FOR ALL SITE UGHTING ELEMENTS AND THEIR LOCATIONS. 5. COORDINATE SWITCHING MD CONTROLS SYSTEMS FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING WITH OWNER, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. VERIFY ALL SWITCH LOCATIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 8. INSTALL LIGHT FIXTURES PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND PER LOCAL, STATE, MD NATIONAL REGULATIONS. 7. ALL LIGHTING IN PAVEMENT AND HARDSCAPE TO BE CORE DRILLED. VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS IN HARDSCAPE AREAS PRIOR TO DRILLING.. 8. ALL LIGHT POLE BASES SHALL BE DESIGNED MD SIGNED OFF BY A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. 9. ALL ELECTRICAL JUNCTION BOXES FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS SHALL BE LOCATED IN PLANTING AREAS OR OTHER DISCRETE LOCATIONS MD APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 10. ALL TRANSFORMERS SHOULD BE SIZED TO ALLOW FOR ANY FUTURE INCREASE IN SYSTEM LOAD, AS WELL AS THE RESISTIVE VALUES ASSOCIATED WITH LONGER CABLE RUN DISTANCES AND THE USE OF VOLTAGE TAPS GREATER THAN 12-VOLT. INSTALL TRANSFORMERS PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 11. ALL 120-VOLT ELECTRICAL WORK SHOULD BE PERFORMED BY A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY LAW. REFER TO ALL NEC MD ALL LOCAL CODES FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS 12. ALL EXTERIOR RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULD BE G.F.C.I.-PROTECTED FOR USE WITH TRANSFORMERS THAT UTILIZE A PLUG-IN CORD. ALL RECEPTACLE BOXES SHOULD UTILIZE AN 'IN.USE' OR 'BUBBLE' TYPE RECEPTACLE COVER TO PROTECT IT FROM WATER ENTRY. 13. ALL RECEPTACLES, LOW VOLTAGE TRANSFORMERS, AND FIXTURES CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF ANY WATER SOURCE THAT WOULD BE NORMALLY OCCUPIED BY HUMANS. 14. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SYSTEM SHALL CONNECT TO EITHER PHOTOCELL OR ASTRONOMICAL TIMER VERIFY FINAL LIGHTING CONTROLS WITH OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. RESTORATION NOTES 1. ALL EXOTICS, INVASIVE AND UNDESIRED TALL NATIVE SPECIES TARGETED FOR REMOVAL WILL BE REMOVED BY HAND OR SPRAYED WITH APPROVED HERBICIDE. THIS WORK SHALL BEGIN DURING THE FIRST STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION ABS EXTEND THROUGH THE MANAGEMENT PERIOD. 2. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF NATIVE SPECIES TO BE LEFT AND MANAGED ON SITE. 3. RESTORATION PLANTING AND SEEDING SHALL BEGIN AFTER ALL CONSTRUCTION AND TREE PLANTING WORK IS COMPLETE AND THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM INSTALLED BY OTHERS IS IN PLACE 4. RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF THE PLANTING AND SEEDING START DATE A MINIMUM OF ONE WEEK PRIOR TO SEEDING AND PLANTING. 5. SALVAGED TOPSOIL APPROVED BY THE RESTORATION CONTRACTOR WILL BE SPREAD ONLY ON AREAS CLEARED OF TOPSOIL DURING CONSTRUCTION APPROVED TOPSOIL WILL ONLY BE SPREAD TO THE ORIGINAL GRADE OR GRADE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 6. SEVERELY COMPACTED SOIL CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC SHALL BE LOOSENED TO ORIGINAL GRADE BY OTHERS. MINOR COMPACTION SHALL BE LOOSENED BY RESTORATION CONTRACTOR TO ORIGINAL GRADE OR GRADE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. SEEDING SHALL BE HAND BROADCAST AND RAKED EITHER BY HMO OR WITH A DRAG HARROW. B. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE WARRANTED BY THE RESTORATION CONTRACTOR FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER OWNERS WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS Of VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MY OCCUR PRIOR TO THE OWNERS WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 9. SEEDED AND SODDED AREAS SHALL BE WATERED WITH THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM (INSTALLED BY OTHERS) FORA MINIMUM OF FOUR WEEKS OR UNTIL SEED IS ESTABLISHED. ALL WATERING ASSUMES A SYSTEM COVERING ALL RESTORATION AREAS IS IN PLACE AND RESTORATION CONTRACTOR HAS CONTROL OVER WATERING SCHEDULE FOR RESTORATION AREAS. 10. PLANTINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO SPECIFIC ZONE SECTION NEEDS ABS NOT ACCORDING TOA FIXED PATTERN. ON-CENTER GOALS ARE ON AVERAGE. 11. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE ALL SEEDING LOCATIONS PRIOR TO SEEDING. 12. NO FERTILIZER OR SOIL AMENDMENTS ARE REQUIRED IN THE RESTORATION AREAS UNLESS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE RESTORATION CONTRACTOR. 13. RESTORATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION UPON COMPLETION OF ALL RESTORATION SEEDING AND PLANTING WORK. WARRANTY ._ 1. ALL HARDSCAPE MD PAVING AREAS TO BE WARRANTED FOR 1 YEAR AF TER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. 2 ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE WARRANTED FOR 1 YEAR AFTER OWNER ACCEPTANCE. AN INSPECTION OF PLANT MATERIAL WILL OCCUR AFTER THE FIRST YEAR FOLLOWING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION I OWNER ACCEPTANCE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTORS OF INSPECTION DATE. REPLACEMENTS MY BE REQUIRED AT THIS TIME REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF INSPECTION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED HORTICULTURAL PRACTICES. LANDSCAPE STRUCTURAL NOTES 1. BUILDING CODE: CONFORM TO LATEST EDITION OF STATE BUILDING CODE MID INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MEANS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FOR THE SAFETY OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS ABS REGULATIONS DURING THE WORK THE ENGINEER WILL NOT ADVISE ON NOR ISSUE DIRECTION AS TO SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS. 3 THE DRAWINGS HEREIN REPRESENT THE FINISHED STRUCTURE. DURING ERECTION OF THE STRUCTURE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR TEMPORARY SHORING, BRACING, FORMING, ETC. TO HOLD THE STRUCTURE IN PROPER ALIGNMENT ABS TO WITHSTAND ALL LOADS TO WHICH THE STRUCTURE MAY BE SUBJECTED. SUCH MEASURES SHALL BE LEFT IN PLACE AS LONG AS REQUIRED FOR SAFETY ABS UNTIL ALL FRAMING AND CONNECTIONS ARE IN PLACE. 4. FOOTINGS AND SOIL DATA 4.1. SOIL PARAMETERS ARE ASSUMED FOR THE DESIGN OF THE RETAINING WALLS FOR THE FOLLOWING: 4.1. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY. 2000 PSF. 4.1.5. LATERAL SOIL PRESSURES (EQUIVALENT FLUID PRESSURE) 45 PCF 4.2. FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON NATURAL UNDISTURBED SOIL OR ON COMPACTED, ENGINEERED FILL ALL SUBGRADE SHALL BE PREPARED AND COMPACTED ACCORDING TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS PROVIDED BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 5. ALL TOPSOIL. FILL AND OTHER UNSUITABLE BEARING MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL INSPECT THE EXCAVATED AREA TO ENSURE ALL MATERIALS REQUIRING REMOVAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED MD TO VERIFY THE SOIL BEARING CAPACITY USED FOR DESIGN PRIOR TO CONCRETE PLACEMENT. 6. EMBEDMENT DEPTH FROM EXTERIOR GRADE TO BOTTOM OF FOOTING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 5,0'. BOTTOM OF FOOTING ELEVATION SHALL BE LOWERED AS REQUIRED TO MEET THIS MINIMUM, 7. ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES OF FREE-DRAINING GRANULAR SACKFUL. FULL HEIGHT OF WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PROVIDE CONTROL JOINTS IN RETAINING WALLS AT APPROXIMATELY EQUAL INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 40 FEET OR 3 TIMES THE WALL HEIGHT. PROVIDE EXPANSION JOINTS AT EVERY FOURTH CONTROL JOINT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 8. MUD SLABS, FOOTINGS OR SLABS SHALL NOT BE PLACED ONTO OR AGAINST SUBGRADE CONTAINING FREE WATER, FROST OR ICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT ANY FROST OR ICE FROM PENETRATING ANY FOOTING OR SLAB SUBGRADE BEFORE AND AFTER PLACING CONCRETE UNTIL SUCH SUBGRADES ARE FULLY PROTECTED BY THE PERMANENT BUILDING STRUCTURE OR PROPER DEPTH OF BURY. 9. DO NOT UNDERMINE EXISTING FOUNDATIONS. 10 REINFORCED CONCRETE: 10.1. DESIGN CODE. USE BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL CONCRETE (ACI 318), LATEST ADOPTION 10 2. CONCRETE MIXES SHALL BE DESIGNED PER ACI 301 USING THE FOLLOWING PARAMETERS' 10.2.a. PORTLAND CEMENT CONFORMING TO ASTM C150 OR C595. 10.2.b. AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO ASTM C33. 10.2.c ADMIXTURES CONFORMING TO ASTM C494, C1017, AND C260. DO NOT USE CALCIUM CHLORIDE OR ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CALCIUM CHLORIDE. 10.211 CONCRETE SHALL BE READY-MIXED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM C94. 11. REINFORCING STEEL 11.1. BARS -ASTM A6I5, GR. 60 11.2. PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI AND CRS/ STANDARDS. 11.3 DO NOT FIELD BENS BARS PARTIALLY EMBEDDED IN HARDENED CONCRETE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED OR ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER. 11.4. PROVIDE CORNER BARS EQUAL IN SIZE AND SPACING TO WALL HORIZONTAL REINFORCEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED. 12. COLO WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOW PROCEDURES IN ACI 306. 13 HOT WEATHER CONCRETING SHALL FOLLOW PROCEDURES IN ACI 305. 14 PROVIDE 32 BAR DIAMETER LAP LENGTHS FOR WALL FOOTINGS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FOR OTHER LAP LENGTHS PROVIDE CLASS B LAP SPLICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 318 15 BAR SUPPORTS MD HOLDING BMS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL REINFORCING STEEL TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER. BAR SUPPORTS SHALL BE PLASTIC, PLASTIC TIPPED, EPDXY COATED OR STAINLESS STEEL FOR UNCOATED STEEL. BM SUPPORTS FOR COATED STEEL SHALL BE PLASTIC, PLASTIC COATED OR EPDXY COATED. 16 CONCRETE MIX DESIGN(S) SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEER/ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW, 17. PROVIDE REINFORCING STEEL SHOP DRAWINGS TO ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW / APPROVAL. 18. MATERIAL STRENGTHS: TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 1N31A11_&dci3C1 ONINNV7d 00 fV O VNICI3 AO All0 BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The designs shown and described herein includ ng technical drawngs, graphics and specifications thereof. are proprietary and cannot be copied. duplicated or commercialty explo led. in whole or in pan, wthout the express wntlen perrriss on of Travis Van Uwe Studo, LLC. These are mailable Tor firrited review and evaluation by clients. consultants. oantreclom, government agencies, and vendors only in accordance MS this notice. O Copyright 2021 Travis Van Uwe Stod,o, LLC. An rights reserved. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me on under my 0 rect supenrision and Mat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Stale of Mnnesola. TRAVIS VAN LIERE icense no: 43725 dale: 412212021 NOTE. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Rev II Deskprl orT - ISSUED FOR VARIMCE 0818.2021 . _ ng• GENERAL PROJECT NOTES o Drawn By 13W Date: 412217021 ScaPe HIS Sheet: L001 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI PAVING. CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4. REFER TO SHEET L010 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 5. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELOANO APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON E REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. GENERAL NOTES TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 512 345 4275 9:6\1) 7/7 .4011111.T1.4?„7. -2/;>'.42 - = BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5 4 0 4 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The designs shown and described herein including al technical draw' ngs, graphics and specifications thereof. are propnetary and cannot be copied. duplicated or commercially myilo led, in *hole or In part, *'.M Wt the express witten periniss on of Trans Van LIM Studio, LLC. These are available for \ filled renew and eyeuation by dents, consuttants, contractors, governernent agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. Copyright 2021 Trans Van Lime Studio, LLC. NI fights reserved. I hereby certify that the plan, spedficalen, or report was prepared by me or under my cl red supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under Me laws of the Stale of Minnesota. TRAVIS VAN LIERE icense no: 43721 dale: 6/238021 NOTE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUED FOR Da : 00.23.20 p 21 Drawng EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN Drawn By BW Date: 5/23/2021 Sue,: 1"•1E0000001' Sheet' LO 1 0 0, 0 --.-,--e 1.•-.. A-4'..-r-'f' C3 -'15'. • • • ,,,..' ....,..• -frrt , -- -- ,,,„..3--.-.- - ' .' •••••• - -_,--. - --_,,,,,--..,-- (A 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. • SAVE AND PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE • SAVE AND PROTECT 6-- 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK- SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR a X 3. EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY • SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS MY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING IL EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL SAVE AND PROTECT CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT X 92' 11 1 X '939 9 9155 R. 9 80 / -(P‘ N 0 343 gy7,, 11 z EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN f.7373174 ,frf /'&41 x 91:c: Ce 0 -1Th 19Nk c 7.' / Y.1? Apreiworo'firraerersor .4p5orismoigrAir. Apr ( • X9,06 1 9)5.4 \I '9'46 X 19099 / X 9/9 9139 I L001 ( I " • /'•-''t'-• =l• • 928 0 `„' X 34? 4 X 941 z . 941 :44,Vt,-. mg, .--,,, . I - .,,,..,..0 • • 4,_•-,.." '4141; 1 0 k • . 4,4 we qv ,,, A., Lu :9._ .c.." -. "LT.' ....... - -- ..„ / \ / TOPSOIL A i.„.,.. STOCKPILE-I y- -- -‘ \`-/ / X 918 I q SHEET NOTES 1. AGGREGATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AREA 3. TREE PROTECTION FENCE, TYPICAL 4. EROSION CONTROL FENCE. TYPICAL LEGEND - a a PROPERTY LINE SETBACK — cirm — ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK EXISTING CONTOURS — LOP. — LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE w SILT FENCE EXISTING FENCE -44nce POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW SITE ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED / 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED . LEM COW. 6001 REMOVAL KEY Itef 06.09101 RI EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED R2 EXISTING HOUSE TO BE DEMOLISHED R3 EXISTING PAVER DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED R4 EXISTING PAVING TO BE REMOVED R5 EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED RS EXISTING LANDSCAPE WALL TO BE REMOVED 0 8' 16 37 SCALE: 1 inch =13 feel O 9 ,,,,-;,;•7,0•0004.71!r X 995, 9434 x.. X 91.9) X 9 X, -I IJ " 5)18 X 9?? 9,6 II 9IG 9:6 X1'96 9191 X 9:94 x O ' n . PI ih''/' / Ts. 7,.... /44 I 44 / / N',.., •-... •..... ) ) 1) / I/ ').4. 41/ ; / /X. ''''.' N." \ POND / NN / /* , / / ( 1 ,, ( ; OHW: 907.60 : /, /. ) ! 8 % 91 27/ / \ V / \ i 1`;0[79.6. / I , / / // I e i /// // // /26" OHO •( / / X— -. . 11/, # / .9. // / & / •.. / , o / 4,, ,/,/‘ \ ,q•- • ,( I g- , o- X 910: .,,, „ \ ii. / I '--LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN 6 .3, i / ,..< 9950 ,,,/ / d / / X 9393 \ „,/ ELEVA770N .-. 908.1 - -2- \ r -91 X SD 4 /y .- / „, ,..49 , - / X 9..39.8 ,..„. \\.. / 1 / g / / , / / 7 // \ / / / ----......, / fi/ ..( / / ,- , / 1 ------ - _ftb; / 64.5 )7/1 \! LLQ z - / - ---..k _=.x ,rfz..ic.,,L,-,_-=-5irTir.=-_.„1:4-,F.:,,,,..5E._-E....47,,,,,r,rra-p-ER L,,gs, ..., / .... -7 IR-1F-- / X 9;4 ] NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE N ) CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT /0 / 4.-4-*---.---6,4 \ 4 4 IC : ' 4 -4- ''' , .._...,..' - ' ';111,4-.444-7/ T , 7 0 Alrf#, • 0 0 N- E - 17 1 "I / i • . / '''',.,' „ : :II,. ,' \ , ?! i ,...,. , , ., , ii ...... , ___. „„, , • ,,----,., ,,,- ., .. ,r; , 1.----- 6-,„/ ---..\.,. -----. i 4.,' i\ I ,; , • ," 11111 10 \ / / / / I ; , , ; ,i,- e ,/ / x c„ „ ,, <,..4.- * ' .. ...,-- / / ,--LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN -i, 4.,- • / • ELEVATION = 908.1 1\,, I / / • •1 -I J 6 'rOFTER 179r I A .t.]. ' k GARAGE FFE: 924.50 8' I / eII,/ POND //f7 OHW: 907.60 , PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 0 -L 1-7--- leSIDEPARITSETIES., ) _ ) 11-5 0 AUTO CD,R1 T ...,-. ,co LAVI iii 1,2 / / 1... / Z o / .,Z .,.. / / TREE INVENTORY RECO PROTICIER = • WILDE RAMREMOVARE I WA 111L5.R. MITE PRIAM r PROTECTED , .EAL THY' TIORTVAT STEM r REMOVABLE HEM.1,1,' yap.. r 5 NICE SPRLCE PLEMOVABLE PILEA110 0/T5CE TO SE REINS. METE SPRUCE 1r PROTECTED 01EASEO MODE TORE RELIMED 7 MITE PRASE r REDINAMB NEW./ 005 Of ilTRE-SERVE0 ISR4TE SPRUCE 5. REMOVABLE WADI, ronct TOW REMOIED M. A. 21. PROTECTED Kano OJT5 OE TORE ROMEO ID MEM/ FPI V ROM ME MULTI, 111.50C TORE METED II KARAT MEM V PROTECTED MUM ORS. TORE REMOVER 12 DIRER MEL. r PROTECTED MEM O, ROTH TO BE REMO., 13 SWAM TREE LLAOLC PROTECTED WM/ FERE TO BE ROARED LRTLE LEAP LACER r REDINAllf MUCTIO. 0,5 Of TO ID PRESERWO 15 WRITE ANDEL Ir PROTECT. w....nre to OF PROMO If VAMP WE CNA r PROTECTED REALTRI 005 OE TO EE PRESERVED 12 '571AIR NRTE r POTECT. WALDO 005 DE TON PRESERVED StIA11,WYTE 0.1.1 r PROTECTED NEA.11•1 OUTS DE TO BE PRESEAVED 11 MEMOIR MAPLE I REMOVAME WALDO' OUTS DE TOSE RESERVED E2 BOaIDER a. REMOVABLE RENEW I 0,5CE MBE REMO.° 21 130 ;EIDER a• REMOVABLE WHEW arrs cc TORE REAMED iro-dnoco A. REMOVABLE KALOV V,ITSOE TOME REMOVED DOCEILER REMOVAELE 1.1.1.10 OUT SC1 TORERO/OM BOADDER c REMOVABLE 14E1LTX OBS. TO BE REMOTER 25 DRE SPRUCE C REMOVABLE MM./ . RODE TOURED.. TS MEM/ TR REMOVAIRE MULTI. MOE TO SE REDO.] ELLO10/A El BORROW x ';071113 TX?' 0,5 DE TOREN...I TO SE INHERED 21 M.A. SPRUCE C REMOVABLE TX . 2410E TO 8E REMOVED 11 NMI SPROCE V' PROTEGEE° RS. TORE PA.. AWE LOAM. 31 0114.0 WEN V REMOVABLE ASOE KR RODE TOE REIMER ORM% T r 0 0 11 . : POPOV. SI WOO, r ECHO 51 MORANT RM. r REMOVABLE KHOO lf BORNE 5RILIM REMOVABLE ICBM/ 41 REORDER 1 PROTECTED WALDO 41 WOOED. REMOVABLE MALTBY 41 RED CEDAR Ir RED AS corm r REMOVABLE REAL 44 ORRAT 45 µLEM FR tr PROTECTED REMOVAMLF MOW MI MEAD r PROTECTED PENNY ORME TOSE RESER.° NEETE frR,tEr REDOVADE WORT ROWE TORE RESERVED 4.1 DONNE SPRUCE r REVOINEE KNEW 01211ICE TO BE RESERVED TOTAL NUMBER OF PROTECTED. morrows 3 HEALTHY TREES OUTSIDE OF ALLOWED REMOVAL ENVELOPE TO BE REMOVED cf.... 6 NOTE: SEE L401 FOR TREE REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE IF 32 (i SCALE: 1 IndixIBleel PROTECTED I} SEASFO Ev150E TOREN...3 0,50• TO SE PRES.. OlT5OE PRESERVED PROTECTED 116.3Ell OAS. TO TO BE RE E0 31 OUIROG /SPOT REMOVE/BE 11 010.40 ASP. C REMOVABLE 1.144 MAW. Ir PROT NEAL 1.11111.1 MO 31.14411110.4.I 1r r IRAL OUT TRIM OJTSCE TORE RE110.0 1 • NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE re , TREE INVENTORY GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAYANGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4. REFER TO SHEET L010- EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STARING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 5. 00 NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STARED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE SAVE AND PROTECT 3. EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE MID PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK- SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT Of BEGINNING 8. EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL SAVE AND PROTECT 0 SHEET NOTES 1. ALLOWED TREE REMOVAL ENVELOPE 2. CRITICAL ROOT ZONE, TYPICAL 3. TREE PROTECTION FENCE, TYPICAL 4. EROSION CONTROL FENCE, TYPICAL LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK EXISTING CONTOURS LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE SILT FENCE EXISTING FENCE POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED MID PROTECTED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 IST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 1 B12 3454275 BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The designs shown and described herein inducing al tedinical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are propielary and cannot be copied, dopficced or commercially expo led, In whore or in part, without the express wntten permisson of Trans Van LiTre Studio, LLC. These are available for mrted renew end evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, govemement agencies. and vendors only In accoNance *MHz notice. C CopynghI2021 Trans Van Here Stuido. LLC. AO nghts reserved. I hereby certify that the plan, specificat on, or report was prepared by me or under my d rent supeNision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lava of the State of Afinnesola. TRAVIS VAN LIERE license no: 43720 date: 81202021 NOTE. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Rey6 0.seft Dale ,ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 0828.2021 _ . Draw ng TREE INVENTORY Drawl By Dale Sure Sheet. BW 6/24Q021 I" =16.0000001' L011 GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE SHEET 1001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR. MID IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4. REFER TO SHEET L010- EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PFUOR TO CONSTRUCTION. B. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE MO PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE ANS PROTECT 3. EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK- SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL SAVE AND PROTECT 0 SHEET NOTES LEGEND - e • PROPERTY LINE SETBACK — 01,V — ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARX EXISTING CONTOURS sop — LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE SILT FENCE EXISTING FENCE POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW [>• POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING ts • /i 14,'• ' EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED ie•ZO. We nerm 0 00 PROPOSED NEW TREE t STAIR GAS METER • WATER METER AIR CONDITIONER UNIT Ell GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER Copynghl 2021 Travis Van Liens Study, LLC. AI nghts reserved. TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 3454215 BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The designs shown and described herein including all technical draw ngs, graphics and specifications filmed, we proprietary and cannot be copied, dupteated or commercially capered, in whole or in part, a tout the express vnillen pennies on of Trans Van IJ ere Stucho, LLC. These are available for imded review and evaluation by dents, consultants. contraclors, governement agencies, and vendors only In accordance with this notice. GARAGE FFE: 924.50 IT 0 5' Sheet. L101 °SITE LAYOUT PLAN SCALE: 1 Inds =16 feel DWGMERMMNGSn.VARANCE-SETAJW CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENIT 0 I / I / ,/ I ,, , ,' 6-.'" POND / / ii ( 1. OHW: 907.60 : / // 1 1 ( 1 z / ‘ \ / z ) ) • / )/ \ / i \ / \ .1. / I i / / P //: / I . 1/ / / / . / / 4.7 i I - LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN _,,- / • , \ 10 / A \ ,n,q-.' ///1 ELEVA11ON = 908.1 .2' / .*.' / <I / 40 , 4, , ./ / .1 / ,AY 7 \,1 -, - O , i it ill ,- - , „-- , ,,/ ,/ ,,, I ,/ .&„.4 i ,„ - 7 / , ,, • I mimm. I • , 7.. ../L 0 • '.' a..... 0 ( PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 1 _7 - MY. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me on under my d mot supervision and that I am a duty Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the Stale of htinnewita. TRAVIS VAN LIERE hearse no: 43725 date: 512412001 .1” ISN PE ( "Jr 111JE`ft.ID4IBP's,6,1( """;;;•‘:: • • .105•10.41000411/410 rAroodurAsowoodim 1111 arAwvrAirsoraoroosoisoirommosolor 1,--- 10 SIDE YARD SETBACK - ' - / • • . • • — • • I' • —• ' • •PROPERTY LINE...i • 1.,,, • • • • .r. • • .. • • • • • • • .•• • • • • • / - ---- _ _ _ _ _ _.--•--_- -7,---)1' °' .. I., • • *=, '''' ' 1 j •cc ' I . -1. NOTE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE Rey II Desiifillon Date ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 08.28.2021 SITE LAYOUT PLAN Oman By DW Dale. 6/2112021 Sae. 1' 16.0000001' 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. -SAVE AND PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE • SAVE AND PROTECT 3. EXISTING CITY STREETIALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK- SAVE AND PROTECT. REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING S. EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT LEGEND —..— PROPERTY LINE SETBACK — caw — ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS +t PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION SLOPE-AT-SURFACE / DRAJNAGE FLOW ARROW — accw — LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION TREE PROTECTION FENCE SILT FENCE -v—o—A—A— EXISTING FENCE -45,0* POINT OF BEGINNING 11.101. TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING s, 0 EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED v • : AND PROTECTED COVi C0.198 0 PROPOSED NEW TREE COW. (PM STAIR GAS METER WATER METER AIR CONDITIONER UNIT El GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER 8 CATCH BASIN, ROOF DRAIN, OR AREA DRAIN 000 POP-UP EMITTER -- - - -6 — DRAIN TILE I hereby certify Mat Urn plan, specificaton, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Mat I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws or the Stale of Minnesota. BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAULIER CIRCLE, EDINA, PAN The designs shown and descnbed hereon including al terlytical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or rdrnmercialy expioted. in whole or in part, without Me express vnitten permiss on of Travis Van Live Studio, LLC. These are avelable for limited renew and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only In accordance with this noace. 0 Copyaghl 2021 Trans Van Lien Sktdio, LLC. MI fights reserved. GENERAL NOTES TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 1. SEE SHEET 1001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, ASO WALLS. 4. REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STARING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 5. 00 NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STASES IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. II. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. III 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 1 812 3454275 c- 0- 81c7 91 \ SU I 4 t<o 4 0 0 1 C CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 ?.021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 921.67 cocoa 91 O / , - .., / POND i /1; // 1 , r ; Z._ OHW: 907.60 . I/ // / / ) ; UAW \ / \ Ci— / 1 r / / / i q ,). / /X /'1 / / q- / .,,,,,..". / .• , \ / / . / / %--LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN • / ,/ ELEVADON = 908.1 1 I' /7 // i / / F / ,/ . ,/ / / // Y 1 ti / ,, / // / P E 7:0 1 4( 1 ' /CCEZ-..1 , 7',../4 / /3 - V 7 ..' v , § I.'..!..1'.......7= ' ' "1 ' . ' ' -7/.1•*—** PROPERTY LINE I \ g -- - -- \ g ‘ 91625 TOW 915 67 BOW 910 00 BOW .••••• BOS; S 0 • 16 :3 2 -91358 BOW 913.58 805 91 V 2 rra- i14 V 0.1Elt LESS 00 J200.1#e- 9 50 6' tVy • 9 lEPAYE P.17/011 _J r,tL•7024. 0 -H442483 —1-1-14- • Nroe3 ' 11 -s. x ' —V , liSio-4) so.,0„0sE.1:1-K / H i+8 O BO it TOW 1' GARAGE e FFE: 924.50 I SIDE YARD SETA 7,, e 131969.923.75 TOW: 927.75 \ I — 921.50 0 ea/ / 0. .. \3/s 0 0),Y1 1•••••• • j23.33+ 923 00 00 •"‘ 9,4 At / r / 918.581 M.E. 919.33± M.E. 920.0bii M E • TRAVIS VAN LIERE license no: 43720 date: menu 1 ...lir :lis iiiiiii*Ve -ri tiPKii-•- I li 1 I I PROPOSED HOUSE 1 FFE: 925.00 BFFE 914.75 NOTE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ft.v Desceptio9 • ISSUED FOR VARIANCE Data 06 292021 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 0.1 Aar GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 0 16' 37 E Drawn By B10 Oats. 8128/2021 Scale. 1"= 16.0000001' Sheet L2 0 1 SCALE 1 Inch .16 feel 0 0 OM' OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT O 1, PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 s E) < • .4; • I , —7 SETBACK] UI 15 15 W 1 II ; tiff in I h 1 • • 1‘ - Loloo L000.,00woo 013 POND OHW 90760 • / L 1 / Q .,) I / / a / i / X / ' / / 7 / k" e // \ k \ / / CO . 5?. ' / ' ' --LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN y*' ,/ • / / ELEVATION = 908.1 ..2' / '` • / ;):—. --> / / • '1 ' • / /11 • • •„. • • • • — • • • • • —• • • • • —PROPERTY LINE—. I 1 • . ; L 2 0 DUSTING TREE TO BE SAVED L. AND PROTECTED Dem 0 0 PROPOSED NEW TREE CRVI — STAIR ▪ GAS METER WATER METER 0 AIR CONDITIONER UNIT GENERATOR PLANT SCHEDULE TREES IEA Icr42. HT BIB, MS S EA CAL BIB GENERAL NOTES TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO 1. t. SEE SHEET 1001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 3. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WI 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. t 612 345 4275 4. REFER TO SHEET L010- EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR 5. DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES 7. ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 8. AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. 0 KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S)TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2. EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SRE FEATURE • SAVE AND PROTECT 3. EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE MD PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4. EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK- SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5. PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6. EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL • SAVE AND PROTECT 0 SHEET NOTES 1. BUILDING OVERHANG, TYP. - SEE ARCH. DWGS. 2. PERGOLA OVERHEAD, SEE ARCH. DWGS. 3. ARCHITECTURAL COLUMN, TYP. - SEE ARCH. DWGS. 4. BUILT IN BENCH - SEE ARCH. DINGS. 5. WALL BY ARCHITECT- SEE ARCH. OWLS. 6. OUTDOOR FIREPLACE - SEE ARCH. DWGS. LEGEND PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK EXISTING CONTOURS gena POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA. MN The designs sham and descnbed herein includ,ng technical drawings. graphics and specifications thereof, are propdetary and cannot be copied. Mauled or commercially excreted, in whole or in part, without the express written penrision of Trans Van 1J ore Studio, LLC. These are avatabre Ice limited renew and evareabon by clients, consultants, coarectors, government agendas, and vendors orly in accordance Pith Ws nonce. an rearnea 0.7 s b BALSAM FIR Amelanchxy x gran0dItNa 'Autumn A„ Bril once' , AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY AS Acer saccharum 'Green Mountaa' GREEN MOUNTAJN SUGAR MAPLE I hereby certify that ths Oan, specificat en, or report was prepared by me or under my d rep supervinon and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws dale State of Mnnesola TRAVIS VAN LIERE icense no: 43728 date: 6/24/2011 OTT 0 Coprght 2021 Trans Van Lima Studio, LLC. Al dghts reserved. 17 EA 17 HT. BB NOTE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Roy II Dosor[pit 8A— - Data • ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 08 28.2021 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE or„,, LANDSCAPE PLAN Drann By Dale: Srme, BW 6/24/2021 I' I 16.0000001' OLANDSCAPE PLAN 16' 32' IED Sheet: L401 SCALE: 1 inch =16 feet TRAVIS VAN LIERE STUDIO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 I. BEFORE INSTALLATION APPLY TOPSOIL FERTILIZER AND SEED TO SURFACE. 2 BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL, INSTALL MATS BY ANCHORING IN A 6' DEEP BY WIDE TRENCH WITH APPROXIMATELY 12' OF MAT EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY IT APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12' PORTION OF MAT BACK OVER SEED AND SOIL SECURE MATS WITH A WITH A ROW OF STAPLES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12' APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE MATS. 3. ROLL CENTER MATS IN DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW IN BOTTOM OF CHANNEL 4. PLACE CONSECUTIVE MID ADJACENT MATS END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH A MINIMUM 6' OVERLAP. USE A DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES STAGGERED 4' APART AND 4' ON CENTER TO SECURE OVERLAPPED MATS. 5. FULL LENGTH EDGE OF MATS AT TOP OF SIDE SLOPES MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12' APART IN A 6. DEEP BY 6' WIDE TRENCH. 6. THE TERMINAL END OF MATS MUST BE ANCHORED WITH A ROW OF STAPLES APPROXIMATELY 12' APART IN A 6. DEEP BY 6' WIDE TRENCH 7. BACKFILL AND SEED AFTER STAPLING. B. FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROPER INSTALLATION. CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 612 345 4275 r WASHED COURSE AGGREGATE, - 12' MICE OVER GEOFABRIC EXTEND MATERIAL ABOUT 40' ON TOP OF THE GROUND MID RANDOMLY INSERT STAPLES THROUGH THE MATERIAL ABOUT 20' APART STAPLES AT 3' O.C. '-- STAPLES MUST BE INSERTED THROUGH OVERLAP MATERIAL TRANSVERSE SEAMS: - BLANKET MATERIAL MUST OVERLAP AT LEAST 6' AND STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 20' APART LONGITUDINAL SEAMS, BLANKET MATERIAL MUST OVERLAP AT LEAST 6' AND STAPLES INSERTED THROUGH BOTH FABRICS AT A MAXIMUM SPACING OF 40' APART AT END OF SLOPE ECURE BLANKET MATERIAL BY INSERTINGSTAPLES ABOUT 20' APART THROUGH THE FABRIC DRIPLINE 6' MAX POST SPACING - DRIPLINE 3' MINIMUMS' IDEAL FROM DRIPLINE PLAN NEW INSTALL SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (MNDOT TYPE 6). EQUIVALENT MATERIAL MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ENGINEER, COIR LOG 6.-7. MINIMUM DIAMETER 0 BIOLOG INSTALLATION SCALE: WA WEDGE OR 27.2' STAKE 10 MIN LENGTH 0.5'X0.5' OPENING IN NET SOU. PRE-DRILLED HOLES Date . 08 28 2021 PRUNING CUT, TYP., PER ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS Rey / • ISSUED FOR VARIANCE PLAN VIEW MAXIMUM 25' ON ONE SIDE OR 33% OF TOTAL ROOT SYSTEM I hereby tarty that this plan. specircalion, or report was papered by me or under my direct supeneis on and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the 'ens of the State of Minnesota. NO MORE THAN HALF THE CROWN OF THE TREE ROOT PRUNING LIMITS TRAVIS VAN LIERE :cense no. 43728 date, 4120/2021 NOTE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BASE OF TREE GROUND PLANE qfailLilt.11.11L1 IL013 Matt ROOT ZONE Draveng EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION DETAILS Drawn By BW Dale, 47200021 Scale N/A Sheet ()ROOT PRUNING DETAIL SCALE: NIA STAKE DRIVEN THROUGH LOG MESH WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH WITH HOG RINGS. PER MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3886 81 SILT FENCE METAL OR WOOD) FABRIC POST OR STAKE FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL WITH TAMPED I NATURAL SOIL DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW IIN NATURAL SOIL NOTE: SILT FENCE SHALL FOLLOW MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3888. FIGURE S: TYPICAL INSTALLATION FOR SILT FENCE TABLE 1: MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH AND SLOPE FOR WHICH SILT FENCE IS APPLICABLE BY ACCEPTED DESIGN , PRACTICES SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS 2 FT SILT FENCE STORAGE EQUALS MAXIMUM SLOPE SLOPE (H,V) % FOR A 2•YEAR EVENT OR 3 FT FOR A 2 FT FOR A 100-YEAR EVENT LENGTH 100-YEAR EVENT 100:1 1% 400 FT . 900 Fr IX FT 50:1 2% 200 FT 450 FT 75 FT 25'.1 4% 100 FT 225 FT 75 FT 20.1 5% 80 FT 180 FT 75-50 17:1 6% 67 FT 150 FT SOFT 12.51 8% 50 FT 112 FT i .50 FT 10.1 10% 40 FT 90 FT 50-25 FT 51 20% 20 FT 45 FT 25.15 FT 4:1 25%. 16 FT 38 FT 15 FT 3'.1 r 33% 12 FT 27 FT 15 FT . 2.1 150%` 8 FT 18 FT 15 FT NOTES: 1. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TO BE CATEGORY 4.COCONUT 2S FOR SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.1 AND SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ALL DRAINAGE SWALES AND PONDING AREAS AND CATEGORY 2-STRAW 2S FOR ALL SLOPES LESS THAN 5.1 PER MNDOT SPEC. SECTION 3885 2. INSTALL PER MNOOT SPEC. SECTION 2575 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1. SILT FENCES SHOULD BE INSTALLED ON THE CONTOUR (AS OPPOSED TO UP AND DOWN A HILL) AND CONSTRUCTED SO THAT FLOW CANNOT BYPASS THE ENDS. 2 ENSURE THAT THE DRAINAGE AREA IS NO GREATER THAN 1/4 ACRE PER 100 FT OF FENCE. 3. MAKE THE FENCE STABLE FOR THE 10-YEAR PEAK STORM RUNOFF. 4. WHERE ALL RUNOFF IS TO BE STORED BEHIND THE SILT FENCE, ENSURE THAT THE MAXIMUM SLOPE LENGTH BEHIND THE FENCE DOES NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN IN TABLE BY CALCULATION BY CALCULATION ®SILT FENCE INSTALLATION SCALE WA O EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALLATION SCALE: N/A ®EROSION CONTROL MAT INSTALLATION SCALE: WA & GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAIL SCALE: N/A 6' MAX NOTES: 1. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER OEMOLMON OR AS NECESSARY, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD. 2. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL CONSIST OF TEMPORARY METAL WIRE CHAIN LINK MESH FENCING OR APPROVED EQUAL. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. THE FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT. STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROTECTION. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEARLY CUT ALL ROOTS EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS. ®TREE PROTECTION FENCING INSTALLATION SCALE: N/A L609 an rc a rc 63 F.. BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE, EDINA, MN The des gns shown and descnbed hercln induceng dl technical drawings. graph cs and specfications thereof. are PmFre'41' and cannot be .1,K dupecated or commercially exploded, in whoa or in part. without the express written pesnisdon of Tray's Van Dere Stud o, LLC. These are avadahe for I m ted renew and evaluation by clients, consultants. contractors, govemerrent agencies, and vendors only in accordance with ths notte. Copyright 2021 Trays Van liere Studio. LLC. AI rights reserved. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. dS/ Thomas M. Bloom # 42379 LICENSE NO. LEGEND a -a - (33 0 - CATCH BASIN = FIRE HYDRANT = POWER POLE = MANHOLE TELEPHONE PED. ELEC. TRANSFORMER MU_ GATE VALVE LIGHT POLE TREE = FENCE UNE = SANITARY SEWER UNE = WATER LINE = GAS UNE STORM DRAIN UNE -E- = OVERHEAD USUTY UNE - CONCRETE SURFACE Ti 4 Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474.7964 Web: www.advsur.com SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 DATE: DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE SCALE • 1" = 20' 0 20 40 • • MI= • • • CLIENT NAME (JOB ADDRESS JOHN KRAEMER & SONS, INC. 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN REVISION DESCRIPTION ADD A 2ND SHEET AND SHOW ANOTHER FRONT HOUSE SETBACK TO SO. OATESUINEYEIL SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 DATE DRAFED SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 SHEET TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY DRAWING NUMBER 171023 TB REV 10 - 27 SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SHEET NUMBER S I SHEET 1 OF 2 5, 8- ,,, 79'11 N _331119-- E \ Nine \', e'nd 910.7 10,....0, \ •• N..-- ..N, 5,H0/1 I --- \---- N-------- _v_. t • \ ---- _.\-- --•••= - 9, 3 ' cf,;? -"''''N Ire x . 1 ,t 1 / 4.4.9 i e , I j 4 4?.. :1 NY7 / l'..:' . 4 I IT 9'' ' %val .." / I /0N; ill ; - ,,,.°77" / I -, ! 7.1:;:e, 2:" ) \ A - / ,„ --- -------- t --- X 9166 /1,v!.??,, -- It ISP't , / 1 X17059 II I I I 1 0. \ 91 1 I I I I I 1 I Iki -- • -------- f. q I I 1 1 91 1 \ \ ,,., \ ..13- \ d TT le s97 01.i.p....„,:p,,,,,...s.....,2,1.., ) / /// ,---/ k ‘ `I 9153 \ \ ' \ \ 1 \ n / S, .. ; 915-3 91 91 0/i 9155 91 DeCk / / /,.!:' , 1 , 0"i'' / \ # ) 1 \ 9159 , C, /1 / / ( W" ( X 9006 1 ...\ ) /I I \ •1156 \ .-- a / x 1 119 )15 9 i / \ I 1 I 5+ / . 9155 ) / 4099 j / I ., / / / I I / :1 /)6906.0 X 907/ / / /.36' / I / ( X 91,4 / I ) / / t I 09159 9156 4./ / 0.9. ? ( / / / k \ i 28'. (---_,,, , , / 1 119044 / / / Si ! X 9101 7 9119„ / / / ) ) \ 9154 / ? / / / / / . \ / / ()/ X909.5 I (''0'2 ( I ‘ 9I& 9165 / X 90 1' / X ME i / x sole :27" / ;14- 9153 / / 9' E• / / 10" De id 1 I ..... 1' // Osn a \ ----.--Parers / 78 Cead I I i / J6" -- 09113 ,-' 1 I ita) , 907.!„.. -- X 9002 / ...... ---.31945-- & S r., I, ". „....fAire , / ........,.......e, X 9161 ,_.. --- ..„5.- 89'28'40:- _ ..- -- - ----A‘‘i __......, X9121 M. / '.- j-9116- / ss r rr c), •Z Wad TI X 9224 " @9265 L=18.00 R=532.46 " 6.15673" --Southeast corner of Lot 1. X 925.3 9064 9152 door 9758 57 Garage Floor 917.0s .729 / / round 'X 9151 X 915.4 %9086/ X ;ILI X 91L7 9167 9106 9160 7.991 917 91 TV' 922-5 X, 9222 0 072.9 X 922.4 922.5 4tx.,322. 8' 9226 9~ 110 X 9153 9101 / Driverroy 9200 921,3, X 9206 X981 9223 8- 89230 / X 9267 %,3, 6' 03215 / :1 •V •cj - - "90 - -919- X 911 6' 9230 24" Vim{' ASJ X 925,0,42,,4 9171 ,Benchmork: / Top of manhole 917.4 40A X 9196 X 9239 c,J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2 and that part of Lot I, lying Southerly of a line running from the Southerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point in the easterly line of said Lot I, distant 18.00 feet northwesterly from the southeasterly corner thereof, Block I, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 6. While we show the dwelling to the south, the size and location of that building is approximate. We used an adjoining survey to show the size of the building and we located a few building corners to get the orientation of that building. If the building was not built per the survey the size and or location of that building may not be shown correctly. 7. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. CITY OF EDINA JUN 28 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10/27/17 DATE EXISTING HARDCOVER House 3,333 Sq. Ft. Existing DOCk 483 Sq. Ft. Payer Surfaces 4,218 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 81 Sq. Ft. Bituminous Road 201 Sq. Ft. Ret. Walls 47 Sq. Ft. Deck/Patio Credit .150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 8,214 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 18.0% (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) 0, IT .- tt.. Al .15. 13 , .3c 7' LU -- Threshold of CZ) ',' 9226 /19.9 \ *922.4 X 9225 Threshold of door 9218. 9150 / . /f222 / eXe20/9n1, 2. Threshold at door 92.18---17 Ret. Roll. sus 4' 9 }('1151 7.13 9174 9175 1W A17.7 FaunslAkon ..1=8f- Trees- I171,- Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fence/bin roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term constmctinn activity but must he replaced before the next rain. • A tempomry rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of I to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets. walks or alleys. Potential entrances that ore not so protected shalt be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days. they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-1 I I at 100 Ibtacre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. I lazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas. • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. • If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sad an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Edina requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. EXISTING ELEVATIONS (EXISTING HOME FIRST FLOOR = 923.80) PROPOSED ELEVATIONS FIRST FLOOR (SUB-FLOOR) = 925.00 TOP OF FOUNDATION = 924.75 BASEMENT FLOOR = 914.75 GARAGE FLOOR = 924.50 AVERAGE EXISTING ELEVATION AT FRONT OF PROPOSED HOME = 920.5 CITY OF EDINA JUN 2 8 2021 PLANNING DEPA1RTMENT I HEREBY CERPFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICADON OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER UNDER ME LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. ®1265 L=18.00 - R=532.46 156'13" --Southeast corner of Lot I. X 925.3 MAY 4, 2021 DATE: SCALE - 1' = 20' 0 20 40 INI • ••• M=11 SUSAN BACH BRET HARTLEY 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE House 4,118 Sq. Ft. Rear Screen Porch 434 Sq. Ft. Front Porch 377 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 2,339 Sq. Ft. Concrete Pads 68 Sq. Ft. Patio Credit -150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED COVERAGE 7,186 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 16.74 (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) PROPOSED HARDCOVER HOLM 4,116 Sq. Ft. Rear Screen Porch 434 Sq. Ft. Front Porch 377 Sq. Ft. Pervious Paver Driveway 2,715 Sq. Ft. Bituminous Driveway 727 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios/Steps 3,215 Sq. Ft. Concrete Equip. Pads 88 Sq. Ft. Pool 638 Sq. Ft. Ret. Walls 450 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 12,742 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,7511 Sq. Ft. DATE SURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 DATE DRAFTED: MAY 4, 2021 IMPORTED f7LL: JOX ORGANIC LEAF COMPOST/70K WASHEO SAND (DO NOT COMPACT) EXISTING SOIL '--SCARIFY 12" MIN. BELOW---,- SANO/COMPOST SECTION RAIN GARDEN CROSS SECTION DETAIL NO SCALE LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE ARBON' - FLOPf' SILT FENCE/BM ROLL TREE REMOVAL r-1 xxv vvv '9 DRAWING NUMBER 210730 JR EXISTING HARDCOVER House 3,333 Sq. Ft. Paver Drive/Walk 3,391 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 828 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 81 Sq. Ft. Bituainous Road 201 Sq. Ft. Ret. Walls 47 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,881 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO OHW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 17.24 EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE HOLM 3,333 Sq. Ft. Existing Deck 483 Sq. Ft. Paver Patios 828 Sq. Ft. neek/Patio Credit -150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE 4,494 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT TO ONW 45,758 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 9.84 CD 30k LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 2 and that part of Lot I, lying Southerly of a line running from the Southerly corner of said Lot 1, to a point in the easterly line of said Lot 1, distant 18.00 feet northwesterly from the southeasterly comer thereof, Block I, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey, have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they arc correctly, shown before proceeding with construction. 5. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 6. While vve show the dwelling to the south, the size and location of that building is approximate. We used an adjoining survey to show the size of the building and we located a few building corners to get the orientation of that building. If the building was not built per the survey the size and or location of that building may, not be shown correctly. DRAINAGE SHALL BE ROUTED ---. TO REAR Or PROPERTY 11173/ CONSTRUCTED GRASSED SWALE 7. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder arc. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. 8. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 9. While we show the building setback lines per the City of Edina web site, we suggest you show this survey to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback lines are shown correctly. Do this BEFORE you use this survey to design anything for this site. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsuccom 9250 STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. 9 INSTALL SILT FENCE PROPOSED FENCE 58" E N 791. _338.19-- DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE PROPOSED FENCE I.Exuting R4011,109 909.Jbw FNd ion LI Naren Ina 9066 AO Ina 5 9219 S 911- -91 909 922.4Iw 1.5.9b 2'46'' 1114bw 111 111 111,1111 -RETAINING AL V /44 / 4009 1 X "71IX 3o3 3 I x9t, t of 1 ik4 ;; 1 1 /1iq / .98.1' 5- \ - 211 0 922.1 ,‘\ ."-\vloVSTALL SILT FENCE 6 PA v£R PATIO CLIENT NAME /JOB ADDRESS INSTALL DOUBLE-----. ROW SKr FENCE ‘N, 918.4bw \ PROPOSED POOL °ONO), SPA! (WATER REV =924.2.5) %9214 981.02r4 fi 4, , ,1 t fir m \ 0 ) al // 44. a-92/.8 2.9z '-821.8 '4.215 tri %.924.5er x'.9.9 01.06/30 )) x907.7/ / 924.5tw-- ,914.7bb L -RETAINING WALL '-.9/8.8 / Se. /1 r9 1 1 44,!.... , 4 , ..` / ,, ‘-.LOCAL FLOOD PLAIN ...... , ELEVATION=908.1 ''.. `..., b. 1. //, X 9006 /,/ X 9005 - X / Z./ ,_ ' Se ' ' Se i .'l r 1., 11 "4. F!: 049 ( , \ .P .:(.7......,L.:2 1.4.4,5 15' 0- \li k r r V \ :g.:1,7;:j X 9150 x ems 9191 --INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER NOTES __Pat 988 0.98/ 150 - INSTALL SKr FENCE 949 168 r-.9471-0 .077 -------- 4 L 0/ / /,,/ 7/ r- • AF X 90 9107 \ DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 5-6-21 ADJUSTED SETBACK 9/ /5 9103 .9/7 15 .917 RAISED/MOVED HOME Benchmark: Tap of manhole 917.4 11015. lir_ 0_ .421w fi '9154-PROPOSED RAW GARDEN INSTALL-- (SEE DETAIL) SILT FENCE 6-25-21 'OM 5 fir - Niue sw X 9092 X 9151 INSTALL SILT FENCE 907 - -31 5-- ' -918.0W 89'28'40 9,43,1,w .X 9101 • X 912.3 stir .1(124- 49104 \--RETAINING WALL "se- 791L4 PLANT TYPICAL RAIN GARDEN SHRUBS AND PLANTS APPLY 4" WOOD OR ROCK-, MULCH AROUND PLAN77NGS OVERFLOW=916.5--, • INV=9/5. SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SURVEY & TREE PROTECTION X 920.5 980 920.5-•"' PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 27.84 (AREA OF LOT BELOW 0116 5,042 Sq. Ft.) - SF - SHEET SIZE 22 X 34 SHEET NUMBER SI PROTECT EXISTING TREE (INSTALL ORANGE CONST: FENCE AROUND TREE TO PROTECT) (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) (AREA OF LOT BELOW OHW 5,042 Sq. Ft.) (Existing Deck Not Included, Pervious Below) SHEET 1 OF 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN. SPECIRCATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER NY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER UNDER IRE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. LICENSE NO. MAY 4, 2021 DATE: DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE SCALE -1" = 20' 0 20 40 • MI NEM • ••• CLIENT NAME I JOB ADDRESS SUSAN BACH BRET HARTLEY 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION 5-6-21 ADJUSTED SETBACK 6-25-21 RAISED/MOVED HOME 6-28-21 ADJUSTED PROP. GRADING DRAWING NUMBER 210730 JR 9258 L STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS: RUNOFF TO RATE TO STREET/NEIGHBOR (SOUTH) & VOLUME CONTROL FOR RUNOFF TO POND (WEST) Advance EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP Surveying & Engineering, Co. N 7911'58' E __338.1 - 1. VOLUME CONTROL - ONSITE RETENTION OF 1.1-INCH STORM EVENT OVER ALL ADDITIONAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ROUTED TO STREET/NEIGHBOR (SOUTH) & TO POND (WEST). EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA (ROUTED TO POND)= 7,881 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA (ROUTED TO POND) = 12,742 SQUARE FEET REQUIRED VOLUME TO RETAIN = 4,861 X 0.1/12) = 446 CUBIC FEET VOLUME OF RETENTION PROVIDED (RAIN GARDEN) = 651 CUBIC FEET --7 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345 Phone (952)474-7964 Web: wene.adesur.com 2s TE„iong Re:04 011 • / / a x as / 49. 9/ ihresho/d of , door 925.8...." \ 922.5 r ree.4 ken , Perth el the I b1 1M X 9219 / 9044 X 9225 1; TOI 8E REMOVED 5" I '904.9 I X 9063 2. RATE CONTROL - NO NET INCREASE IN RUNOFF RATE FROM EXISTING TO PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS FOR THE ATLAS 14, 10-YEAR STORM EVENT RUNOFF TO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY (EAST) & TO STREET (SOUTH). REFER TO STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY TABLE. 0:4 I/ i 1 II 1 I i I 1 1 1 111 is' < i I 1 ---111 -- t ------------- ,1,------- i!.!'?.??1_ ( .! -------- ------ .v ------------------- ‘2....,:,, ) \ , 1 1 19 5.1 112. \ , , 1 1 i ' \ '1156 (/' X 90116 1 I ) 1 I / 409.9 < 1 / / 1_, / / / / ) / X 9)16 / 9155 29 Pavers 6 9225 922E 9226 ▪ X929 es '&4 I II da f , 53. tn Threshold at ,+.t C.) door 9158 9159 Is, 4 Ji 9,50 9152 • Yt STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY 9158 9250 91 9153 Payers STORM EVENT El (SOUTH)(CFS) P1 (SOUTH)(CFS) 10-YEAR 0.71 0.70 5' Threshold at B door 97.3.8-7 of 7 -0 81 Pz; 56 'NOTES: 1. RESULTS ARE DERIVED FROM HYDROCAD MODELING SOFTWARE UTILIZING ATLAS 14 STORM DATA. 2. TYPE C SOILS PER WEB SOILS SURVEY. 3. RESULTS CONFIRM THAT RATE & VOLUME CONTROL REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN MET. 91 0 9155 92573 ' p 10 as.„, Geroge Floor 917.0 X 9196 9156 919.1 LOCAL FLOOD INUNDATION AREA: STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT 450 9 )9119 916.4 \ 916.5 9167 Ret. Ka/ LOCAL FLOOD INUNDATION AREA: STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT PER CITY: PROPOSED STORAGE VOLUME (VOLUME BELOW ELEV=908.1) SHALL BE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO EXISTING STORAGE VOLUME WITHIN FLOOD INUNDATION AREA (VOLUME BELOW ELEV-908.1). >1 ......... 18 NIII1,x47.9 918 .0mm. 0,1 labh, X 9095 53 91 +44 .t, ( 9180 I 91 • 917.7 • • • 917.9 Driveway • NO FILL PROPOSED WITHIN FLOODPLAIN. Pa 04 I <= 12. .„,,f719111.9 „AS-8926'40:- X 9123 9131 917 ,-Benchmaric Top of manhole 91Z4 417.4 917-3 OL3B 902 X 9092 ‘,14 9151 3.-r9157- X 915.4 58 256 • -12$ - _ - 121; PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP 00, 441,4/04_ >' -Sou of L X 925- INSTALL SILT FENCE PROPOSED FENCE DRAINAGE SHALL BE ROWED ---, TO REAR OF PROPERTY 481 CONSTRUCTED GRASSED SWALE 7911 • 6' MINIMUM...". PROPOSED FENCE ynasDa9 R0°1'4 WASHED ROCK PLACE ROCK OVER GEOTEXTILE - - - FABRIC TYPE IV. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE • • • 91551w- 909.2aw r fa.tra iron LI North a the Om X 9219 ,-'vRETAINING Wit J . NO SCALE 2' X 2-15130D OR STEEL - FENCE POST. 8' MAX. SPACING GEOTEXITLE FABRIC - OVERLAP FABRIC 6" AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS RIRE MESH REINFORCED LAY FABRIC IN THE TRENCH /- FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH MTH , TAMPED NATURAL SOIL 927.41w• 915.08w I 985E, 21.0 46.75 Z7VE,V DWELLING .‘.// : 21 nl opEcnoljor RYNAF-: ''''''svINSTALL SILT FENCE OVERLAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 6' AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS PAVER PATIO INSTALL DOUBLE----- ROW SILT FENCE 921, 75 PROPOSED 'POOL (16-X402, (WATER ELL-V=924.25) 924.75 ! NI 2 W ti DATE SURVEYED: SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 ".x 9250 k ?,1 4. ( ..,.• .9 9156bw : 9.24.5ew-- , ,I .-9.6•58 I L-R TAININ'9 014.W7AbLwL II" rj I , I \ .... I ) I I ,, .:79 . : / /:k jig911666..w<iThis' I ,,, gii.y4 8ASEAILWT .WALL / -.• Z..., /... ,4 sze Phs, DATE DRAFTED: MAY 4, 2021 SHEET TITLE SUPPORT POST ANCHORAGE NOTE: ATTACH FABRIC TO INPLACE SOIL MIN. SUPPORT POSTS MTH RINGS OR IHRE TIES PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SILT FENCE X 919.6 NO SCALE 9191 "-INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION \ ENTRANCE PER NOIES LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SPOT AZ67ATION PROPOSED CONTOUR DRAINAGE ARBOR' - FLOM' SILT FENCE/B/0 ROLL EXIST/NG DRA/NA6E AREA ID PROPOSED DRA/N,46E AREA ID • 920 920 820 - SF - INSTALL SILT FENCE 917 7 • • • SHEET NUMBER S3 ,-Benchmark: „,' Top of manhole 917.4 6,17.4 El P1 907.4 - INSTALL SICT.F.-L-4;EX"" 91556r, 91Z011,• X 9092 - -9180Itr 9111 g/4.3b..14 9151 x Koi57 -6-PROPOSED RAIN GARDEN SHEET 3 OF 3 DATE: 6/11/2021 TO: PKA Architecture FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer Ross Bintner, PE – Engineering Services Manager RE: 5404 Stauder Cir – Site-Specific Standard Review Introduction The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for flood risk and adherence to the relevant policy sections at the request of the architect. This review was performed per discussions with the applicant pursuant to the variance application. Plans reviewed include proposed stormwater management plan, existing conditions and removals plan, planting plan, and floor plans stamped May 7, 2021. Summary of Proposed Work The applicant proposes a to demolish an existing home onsite and build a new walkout home. Description of Flooding Issue The subject property is situated between two ponds, one across the street in subwatershed NMN_75 (eastside) and one in subwatershed NMN_76 (backyard, westside). Each have local flooding issues that set the minimum lowest opening and lowest floor elevations requirements. The site drains to a structural flooding issue. 1. Subwatershed NMN_75 (eastside) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 914.7’ b. Outlet elevation is 914.4’ 2. Subwatershed NMN_76 (westside) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 908.1’ b. Outlet elevation is 905.3’ Standard Flood-Risk Reduction Requirement Flood risk is a function of exposure and vulnerability—the extent to which an asset comes into contact with flood water and to which an exposed asset is able to resist flood-related damage, respectively. The standard requirement described below aims to reduce exposure. Per the City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) Section 3.1.2.2, new principal structures that ae not adjacent to a ponding basin must have a lowest floor elevation at least two feet above the ponding basin outlet elevation. For the proposed new home on the subject property, the required lowest floor elevation is thus 916.4’ (914.4’ + 2’). New principal structures that require a watershed district permit must conform to the Watershed District’s minimum elevation standards. Per the City of Edina CWRMP Section 3.1.2.1.3, new principal structures, additions, and other permanent fixtures must have a lowest entry elevation at least two feet above the applicable 1-percent-annual-chance flood elevation when the structure is within or adjacent to a local flood area. For the proposed new home on the subject property, the required lowest entry elevation on the east is 916.7’ (914.7’ + 2’). The required lowest entry elevation on the west is 910.1’ (908.1’ +2’). Figure 1: Local Flooding Issues at 5404 Stauder Cir Alternative Mitigation Measures The applicant requested an alternative to the standard flood-risk reduction requirement of 2’ of freeboard for the lowest floor. The proposal of a lowest floor within the anticipated local groundwater table may expose this building to flood risk during large storm events via seepage. The Engineering Department is willing to consider a site-specific standard that varies from the 2’ freeboard for the lowest floor standard if measures to reduce vulnerability to the structure are implemented to reduce risk. The Engineering Department would allow for a reduction in the freeboard standard for the lowest floor from 2’ to 0’ if the applicant completed the following items to reduce flood vulnerability: 1. Install a sanitary backflow prevention device or an overhead sanitary sewer connection with sewer ejector. 2. Install a sump pump system with a battery backup. 3. Lowest floor must be reinforced concrete and waterproofed. 4. No net fill below 908.1’. 5. The lowest floor should be engineered to resist prolonged hydrostatic forces. 6. A copy of a complete geotechnical investigations report, including piezometer data on groundwater, prepared and signed by a licensed engineer must be provided to the foundation engineer to ensure the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations are incorporated into the design. 7. The builder should engage their engineer for construction oversight. 8. The engineer should sign and certify that the foundation is reasonably safe from flooding after construction. 9. The swale and retaining wall on the south side shall be designed to mitigate any bypass flow. Proposed trees shown in the planting plan may obstruct flows. Relocate. The conditions must be verified by the City of Edina and satisfied prior to permit closeout. Please note that separate permits may be required for the above requirements. Contact the Building Department to inquire about required permits, e.g., plumbing/mechanical permits. DATE: 7/13/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5404 Stauder Cir - Variance Review , Revised The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included an existing conditions and removals plans, proposed survey, stormwater management plan, grading and drainage plan, and erosion control plan dated June 25th and June 28th , 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes to demolish and rebuild a single unit home. The request is for a variance to the front setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to pond in the back and street in the front. Proposed grading and drainage are similar to existing conditions. Stormwater Mitigation A rain garden is proposed to mitigate the proposed increase in impervious surface. Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP -003 standards. A final grade as -built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Floodplain Development The site is situated between two ponds, one in subwatershed NMN_76 (backyard) and one across the street in subwatershed NMN_75. Each have local flooding issues that set the minimum lowest opening and lowest floor elevations requirements. 1. Subwatershed NMN_76 (to the west) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 908.1’ b. Lowest opening elevation is required at no less than 910.1’ in the rear. c. Outlet elevation is 905.3’ 2. Subwatershed NMN_75 (to the east) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 914.7’ b. Lowest opening elevation is required at no less than 916.7’ in the front and south side yard c. Outlet elevation is 914.4’ d. Lowest floor elevation required at no less than 916.4’. However, a site-specific standard was considered . Refer to the attached memo. The proposed lowest openings in the rear yard is 914.7’ and 918’ on the south side (top of retaining wall). The lowest floor elevation is proposed at 91 4 .75’ and is compliant with the site-specific standard . Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP -002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to relocate the existing driveway entrance. A driveway entrance permit will be required . The street was reconstructed in 2006. Refer to standard plate 540 and 543 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from Stauder Cir . A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the dwellin g is required per the City’s policy SP -024. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. A 1999 sealed well is located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will be required. Retaining walls are proposed . The applicant will be required to submit drawings, cross-section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer for retaining walls greater than 4 -feet. DATE: 7/13/2021 TO: PKA Architecture FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer Ross Bintner, PE – Engineering Services Manager RE: 5404 Stauder Cir – Site-Specific Standard Review Introduction The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for flood risk and adherence to the relevant policy sections at the request of the architect. This review was performed per discussions with the applicant pursuant to the variance application . Plans reviewed include proposed stormwater management plan, existing conditions and removals plan, planting plan, and floor plans dated June 25th and 28th , 2021, along with geotechnical report, foundations engineer letter, and builder’s letter. Summary of Proposed Work The applicant proposes a to demolish an existing home onsite and build a new walkout home. Description of Flooding Issue The subject property is situated between two ponds, one across the street in subwatershed NMN_75 (eastside) and one in subwatershed NMN_76 (backyard, westside). Each have local flooding issues that set the minimum lowest opening and lowest floor elevations requirements. The site d rains to a structural flooding issue. 1. Subwatershed NMN_75 (eastside) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 914.7’ b. Outlet elevation is 914.4’ 2. Subwatershed NMN_76 (westside) a. Local 1%-annual -chance flood elevation is 908.1’ b. Outlet elevation is 905.3’ Standard Flood-Risk Reduction Requirement Flood risk is a function of exposure and vulnerability—the extent to which an asset comes into contact with flood water and to which an exposed asset is able to resist flood -related damage, respectively. The standard requirement described below aims to reduce exposure. Per the City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) Section 3.1.2.2, new principal structures that ae not adjacent to a ponding basin must have a lowest floor elevation at least two feet above the ponding basin outlet elevation. For the proposed new home on the subject property, the required lowest floor elevation is thu s 916.4’ (914.4’ + 2’). New principal structures that require a watershed district permit must conform to the Watershed District’s minimum elevation standards. Per the City of Edina CWRMP Section 3.1.2.1.3, new principal structures, additions, and other permanent fixtures must have a lowest entry elevation at least two feet above the applicable 1 -percent-annual-chance flood elevation when the structure is within or adjacent to a local flood area. For the proposed new home on the subject property , the required lowest entry elevation on the east is 916.7’ (914.7’ + 2’). The required lowest entry elevation on the west is 910.1’ (908.1’ +2’). Figure 1: Local Flooding Issues at 5404 Stauder Cir Alternative Mitigation Measures The applicant requested an alternative to the standard flood -risk reduction requirement of 2’ of freeboard for the lowest floor. The proposal of a lowest floor with in the anticipated local groundwater table may expose this building to flood risk during large storm events via seepage. The Engineering Department is willing to consider a site-specific standard that varies from the 2’ freeboard for the lowest floor standard if measures to reduce vulnerability to the structure are implemented to reduce risk. The Engineering Department would allow for a reduction in the freeboard standard for the lowest floor from 2’ to 0’ if the applicant completed the following items to reduce flood v ulnerability : 1. Install a sanitary backflow prevention device or an overhead sanitary sewer connection with sewer ejector. 2. Install a sump pump system with a battery backup. 3. Lowest floor must be reinforced concrete and waterproofed. 4. No net fill below 908.1’. 5. The lowest floor should be engineered to resist prolonged hydrostatic forces. 6. A copy of a complete geotechnical investigations report, including piezometer data on groundwater, prepared and signed by a licensed engineer must be provided to the foundation engineer to ensure the geotechnical engineer’s recommendations are incorporated into the design. 7. The builder should engage their engineer for construction oversight. 8. The engineer should sign and certify that the foundation is reasonably safe from flooding after construction. 9. The swale and retaining wall on the south side shall be designed to mitigate any bypass flow. Proposed trees shown in the planting plan may obstruct flows. Relocate. The conditions must be verified by the City of Edina and satisfied prior to permit closeout. Please note that separate permits may be required for the above requirements. Contact the Building Department to inquire about required permits, e.g., plumbing/mechanical permits. Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 1 of 7 June 18, 2021 Ms. Ali Boese TVL Studio 211 North First Street, Suite #350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 Re: Engineering Services Report Rain Garden Percolation and Foundation Testing 5404 Stauder Circle Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project No.: 21-765 Ms. Boese: Kilo Engineering, LLC (Kilo) is pleased to transmit this Engineering Services Report for the Rain Garden Soil Testing and single-family residential development located at 5404 Stauder Circle in Edina, Minnesota. This report includes the results of field testing and recommendations for stormwater management and structural support. Kilo appreciates the opportunity to perform this study and looks forward to continuing our participation during this project. If you have questions pertaining to this report, or if Kilo may be of further service, please contact us. Respectfully submitted, KILO ENGINEERING Joseph M. Rozmiarek, P.E. President and Principal Engineer I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: _________________________________ Printed Name: Joseph M. Rozmiarek, P.E. Date: June 18, 2021 License #: 52629 Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 2 of 7 PROJECT INFORMATION Project Authorization and Provided Documentation The following Table summarizes, in chronological order, the Project Authorization History for the services performed and represented in this report by Kilo Engineering, LLC. DOCUMENT AND REFERENCE NUMBER DATE REPRESENTATIVE & COMPANY Request for Proposal 6/8/2021 Ms. Ali Boese, TVL Studio Kilo Proposal 21-252 Kilo Proposal 21-252-R1 6/8/2021 6/14/2021 Mr. Joseph Rozmiarek Kilo Engineering, LLC Notice to Proceed: 6/15/2021 Mr. Travis Van Liere, TVL Studio The following documents were provided by the client for this project. DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL PROVIDER/SOURCE DATE Bach-Hartman Landscape Architecture Plans from TVL Studio Ms. Ali Boese TVL Studio Contracting 5/5/2021 Project Description Kilo understands that the project includes the design of a stormwater management system for a planned single-family residence located at 5404 Stauder Circle in Edina, Minnesota. The site is currently developed with a single-family residence that is to be demolished as part of this project. The proposed residence has planned exterior improvements, including a patio area and pool. The guidance provided by the City of Edina and the Nine Mile Creek watershed district ind icate that the proposed additional impervious areas exceed a threshold that requires on-site infiltration, retention, and treatment of stormwater, which is being achieved through the use of rain gardens to the southwest and northeast of the existing building. A site plan with the proposed new impervious areas and new rain garden locations were provided as noted in this report. Kilo Engineering was engaged by the client to perform on-site soil sampling testing in order to estimate the allowable infiltration rates as specified by the Minnesota Stormwater Design Manual. As part of the scope, soil strength testing to confirm the code- minimum bearing pressure of 1,500 pounds per square foot was also completed. SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Field Exploration Summary The following locations were sampled with soil borings to explore the subsurface conditions at the site: Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 3 of 7 BORING BORING TYPE LOCATION SURFACE ELEVATION (FT MSL) DEPTH OF BORING (FT) TERMINATION ELEVATION (FT MSL) T-1 Stormwater Southeast Rain Garden 918± 5 913± T-2 Building Southwest Section 915± 5 910± T-3 Building Northwest Section 916± 5 911± T-4 Building Northeast Section 922± 5 917± The borings were located in the field within the proposed building and rain garden locations and the locations were recorded utilizing handheld GPS technology with an estimated horizontal accuracy of 10± feet. The surface elevation at each boring location was from the publicly available MnTOPO LiDAR survey and has an estimated vertical accuracy of 2± feet, consistent with the contour lines of the underlying dataset. The borings were completed utilizing solid-stem power auger boring techniques. Representative samples of the recovered soils in the auger cuttings were used for soil classification. The auger cuttings were observed in a continuous manner during boring advancement to target depths of 5 feet below existing site grades. A representative sample from each boring was retained and sealed in a plastic bag to minimize moisture loss and was labeled with the boring number and depth of recovery. A sample of the recovered auger cuttings in Boring T-1 was tested in the laboratory for gradation and is reported in the appendix of this report. The soil stratigraphy encountered in the field exploration is generalized in the table below: SOIL (USCS) SOIL DESCRIPTION SOIL COLOR DEPTH RANGE (FT) NOTES OL Surficial Organic Soil Black 0 to 1/2 foot Silty Sand, Trace Organics SC Clayey Sand, Trace Gravel Brown 1/2 to 5 feet Sandy Loam (USDA) The shallow site soils encountered in the field exploration were compared to the mapped Web Soil Survey prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. This service has mapped soil properties for 95% of the United States. At this location, the mapped soils consist of the Lester Loam. This stratum consists of approximately equal amounts of sand-, silt-, and clay-sized particles in the upper soil profile. Due to the developed nature of the site, these soils may have been previously disturbed. These soils are generally consistent with the materials encountered during this field exploration. The NRCS soil descriptions consider these soils “slightly limited” for septic absorption fields at grade, an analog for infiltration capacity. It should be noted that the underlying soil sampling for this database was primarily for agricultural purposes, and only covers the approximate upper five feet of the soil profile. Soils are not homogenous and may change both vertically and laterally between the boring locations. Clear separation between strata may not be observed in the field, with gradual transitions between soil types encountered. The general soil description above is generalized for convenience. Full details regarding the soils encountered during this exploration are included in the boring logs in the appendix of this report, including soil descriptions, penetration resistances, moisture contents, and completed laboratory testing to define soil engineering properties. Water level observations are only valid for the Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 4 of 7 time and locations sampled and may vary substantially with time. The samples not altered by laboratory testing will be stored for 30 days from the date of this report this dis posed unless retention is requested by the client. Storage fees for soils retained beyond 30 days may apply. CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS Rain Garden Percolation Testing At the time of Kilo’s field exploration, no site grading or construction work had been completed on site. Test locations were selected based off coordinates from the provided plans by TVL Studio. The existing ground surface consisted of landscape grasses with limited tree cover on site. The surficial organic soils consisted of silty sand with trace organics and were underlain by clayey sand soils with trace gravel to the termination depth of the borings at five feet below existing site grades. These soils were visibly moist but not saturated in the depths of the borings. The proposed bottom of feature elevation for the northeast rain garden is 914± feet MSL. The static groundwater level is anticipated to be near the gradient between the surface water elevations of the unnamed lake to the west (906± ft MSL) to the west of the site and the unnamed lake (914± ft MSL) to the east of the site. A map of these surface water features is included in the appendix of this report. These locations are noted on publicly available topographic maps. This report is based on the existing grades being representative of those noted in the provided site survey, and no independent elevations measurements were completed by Kilo. No groundwater, changes in colorization or moisture content were observed in tests completed to approximate elevation 910± feet MSL during this exploration. Based on the soil types observed in the auger cuttings, the soils above the testing elevation have the somewhat limited infiltration capacity for the construction of a future rain garden . Groundwater was not observed in any boring, and no changes in soil colorization representative of seasonal high groundwater levels were observed. Given these observations, no “confining layer” due to high groundwater was present. The design infiltration rate of 0.3 inches per hour for Loam (more restrictive than Loamy Sand) should be used for the design infiltration rates for the stormwater management areas in accordance with the Minnesota Stormwater Design Manual. The stormwater areas will require sizing and locating based on-site constraints. The only limiting factor on the bottom of feature elevation is maintaining a three-foot separation from the seasonal high-water level, which was not encountered during the site testing. The depth of the feature will be limited by the 48-hour drawdown depth (14.4 inches, based on 0.3 in/hr infiltration). The storage volume of the feature will be dependent on the design storm calculations, new building and impervious areas, and the lateral extents of the feature. It should be noted that the authorized scope of work did not include infiltration testing to determine infiltration rates above those specified in the Minnesota Stormwater Design Manual. The scope of services did not include HydroCAD modeling of the site to determine runoff volumes. This should be completed by others after the proposed site plan has been completed for impervious area calculations. Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 5 of 7 REPORT LIMITATIONS The recommendations submitted are based on the project information provided by the client, the subsurface information acquired during the field exploration, and Kilo’s engineering experience with similar projects. If project details were to change, including the type of construction or location of features, Kilo should be contacted to verify the validity of the se recommendations. If changes do not occur without Kilo having the opportunity to review the changes and revise their recommendations accordingly, Kilo accepts no responsibility for the impact of changes on the project. The geotechnical engineer has endeavored to adhere to generally accepted professional geotechnical engineering practices in the local area with the findings, recommendations, specifications, or professional advice contained in this report. No other warranties are implied or expressed. This report is based on the recommendations contained herein being incorporated into the project plans and specifications, and that adequate construction quality control measures are utilized. This report may be used only by the client, their design team, and only for the purposes stated, within three years from its issuance. Land use, site conditions (both on site and off site) or other factors may change over time, and additional work may be required with the passage of time. Any party other than the client who wishes to use this report shall notify Kilo of such intended use. Based on the intended use of the report, Kilo may require that additional work be performed and that an updated report be issued. Non-compliance with any of these requirements by the client or anyone else will release Kilo from any liability resulting from the use of this report by any unauthorized party. Test T-1 – Brown Clayey Sand with Trace Gravel below landscape rock and fabric Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 6 of 7 Test T-4 – Brown Clayey Sand below Silty Sand Topsoil Publicly-available MnTopo Elevation data – accessed June 18, 2021 from http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/maps/mntopo/ (Annotations by Kilo Engineering for clarification) Unnamed Lake – NWL 906± ft MSL Unnamed Lake – NWL 914± ft MSL Site - 914± ft MSL Bottom of Feature elevation Rain Garden Infiltration Testing Edina, Minnesota Kilo Project 21-765 – June 18, 2021 Page 7 of 7 Site aerial photograph with the test locations annotated Kilo Project: Project Address: Test #Latitude Longitude Bearing Capacity (psf) Subgrade 1 44.90503 -93.39282 1700 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 Clayey Sand 2 44.90501 -93.39316 2000 4 5 4 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 Clayey Sand 3 44.90537 -93.39305 2000 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 Clayey Sand 4 44.90534 -93.39285 2000 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 Clayey Sand 1500 Test Date: Report Date: Report Reviewed by: Joseph M. Rozmiarek, PE MN PE #52629 DCP Penetration Resistance (Blows/2'') Testing completed from 0" to 30" below grade J. Rozmiarek 6/16/2021 6/17/2021 Technician: Test T-3, Clayey Sand, typical 1500 psf based on code-minimum bearing pressures - no plans provided. Comments:Required Capacity: Test T-2, facing northwest during DCP testing Northwest Building Corner Northeast Building Corner Description Rain Garden, SE Building Corner Southwest Building Corner Proposed Residence 5404 Stauder Circle Edina, Minnesota DCP Test Summary 1 21-765 Work Order #: Kilo Project #: Date: Project Name:Prop. Use: Project Address:Sampled: Received: Kilo Project #:Tested: Work Order #:Tested by: Start Wt:213.4 Start Wt:Start Wt: Wt. Retain % Retain Wt. Retain % Retain Wt. Retain % Retain Min Max 1-1/2"38.0 0 0.0% 1"25.4 3/4"19.0 16.6 7.8% 1/2"12.5 3/8"9.5 12.5 5.9% #4 4.75 10.8 5.1% #8 2.36 #10 2.00 32.6 15.3% #16 1.18 #20 0.84 #30 0.60 #40 0.42 57.7 27.0% #50 0.30 #60 0.25 #80 0.177 #100 0.149 #200 0.075 46.3 21.7% Pan 0.00 36.9 17.3% Sieve Opening (mm) Sieve Size Specification J. Rozmiarek N/A TP-1, 2-4 ft depth Sample 2 Sample 3 Hand Auger/CuttingsSampling Method: Edina, MN 6/16/2021 21-765 6/17/2021 See Sample Desc.Sample Depth: Proposed Residence Subgrade/Fill 5404 Stauder Circle 6/16/2021 Sample Type:Native Subgrade Building AreasSample Location: ASTM D422 6/17/2021 Soil Laboratory Testing Report Reviewed by:Particle Size Analysis of Soils Joseph M. Rozmiarek, PE 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0.0750.7507.50075.000Percent PassingSieve Opening (mm) TP-1, 2-4 ft depth Date: June 21, 2021 To: PKA Architects, Inc. 2919 James Ave. S.. Minneapolis, MN 55408 Attn: Ryan Fish, Architect From: Eric Bunkers Project: Bach Hartley Residence 5404 Stauder Cir. Edina, MN 55436 Proj. No: 21069 Subject: Proposed Construction Dear Ryan: As requested, we are responding to the Site Specific Review by the City of Edina dated June 11, 2021 for the above referenced project. It is our understanding the city will allow for a reduction in the freeboard standard for the lowest floor from 2ft to 0ft if certain design items are employed to help reduce the flood vulnerability of the proposed structure. The city has listed architectural, structural and soil analysis items in their review, and we are responding to the structural items listed below with corresponding numbers: #5. We are anticipating thickening the lower level slab and enlarge concrete footings as required to help resist hydrostatic forces. We are also anticipating increasing the amount of concrete rebar reinforcing and concrete strengths as required to support anticipated hydrostatic forces. #6. We are anticipating basing our structural design on the written geotechnical investigation report #21-765 dated June 18, 2021 from Kilo Engineering who base their soils analysis from soil borings and professional opinions. #8. Our design intent is to provide a foundation design that is reasonably able to resist anticipated flooding loads. #9. We are anticipating to design tall concrete retaining walls with loads and a 1500 psf allowable soil footing pressure indicated in the geotechnical investigation report mentioned above. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Bunkers and Associates, LLC Eric M. Bunkers, P.E. MN Reg. Num. 26490 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Eric M. Bunkers Date: June 21, 2021 Reg. No. 26490 MBR MARSDEN BUILDING & REMODELING LLC 11989 30TH ST N LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 p.612-229-1985 MN LIC # BC630340 June 25th, 2021 To Whom it may Concern, In response to the Edina Engineering Department letter addressing the flood risk reduction variance at 5404 Stauder Circle, we at Marsden Building agree to follow the stipulations set forth in the 9-point list issued on 6/11/2021. Specifically, we will - provide a sanitary backflow prevention device - install a sump pump system with battery backup - install a reinforced and waterproofed basement floor as specified by our P.E. - avoid net fill below 908.1’ - follow the specifications set forth by our P.E to ensure the basement floor is able to resist prolonged hydrostatic forces - Work with the P.E. throughout the project ensuring project oversight - Follow the design directives on the south side swale and retaining wall Thank you, Chris Marsden President of Marsden Building & Remodeling LLC www.marsdenbr.com 612.229.1985 info@marsdenbr.com Date: June 24, 2021 To: PKA Architects, Inc. 2919 James Ave. S.. Minneapolis, MN 55408 Attn: Ryan Fish, Architect From: Eric Bunkers Project: Bach Hartley Residence 5404 Stauder Cir. Edina, MN 55436 Proj. No: 21069 Subject: Proposed Construction Dear Ryan: As requested, we are responding to the Site Specific Review by the City of Edina dated June 11, 2021 for the above referenced project. It is our understanding the city will allow for a reduction in the freeboard standard for the lowest floor from 2ft to 0ft if certain design items are employed to help reduce the flood vulnerability of the proposed structure. The city has listed architectural, structural and soil analysis items in their review, and we are responding to the structural items listed below with corresponding numbers: #5. We are anticipating thickening the lower level slab and enlarge concrete footings as required to help resist hydrostatic forces. We are also anticipating increasing the amount of concrete rebar reinforcing and concrete strengths as required to support anticipated hydrostatic forces. #6. We are anticipating basing our structural design on the written geotechnical investigation report #21-765 dated 6-18-21 from Kilo Engineering who base their soils analysis on soil borings and professional opinions. #7. We are anticipating visiting the site to observe construction and become generally familiar with the overall construction. #8. Our design intent is to provide a foundation design that is reasonably able to resist anticipated flooding loads. #9. We are anticipating to design tall concrete retaining walls with loads and a 1500 psf allowable soil footing pressure indicated in the geotechnical investigation report mentioned above. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Bunkers and Associates, LLC Eric M. Bunkers, P.E. MN Reg. Num. 26490 I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Eric M. Bunkers Date: June 24, 2021 Reg. No. 26490 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM NEIGHBORHOOD DIAGRAM N.T.S. 0’-0” - 50’-0” 50’-0” - 80’-0” 80’-0” - 110’ -0” 110’ -0” - 160’-0” FRONT SETBACK LEGEND 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM STREET SETBACK DIAGRAM N.T.S. 76.75% of proposed residence is within the average setback as prescribed by the Sec.36-439. 100% of the proposed residence is within the setback of the existing structure. 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWTRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB TOPSOIL STOCKPILE 5 66 LOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCNLOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN LOCN L O C N L O C N LOCNLOCNL O C N L O C N 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LI N E 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKEXISTING HOUSE SETBACK1 2 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 4 -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R -4R -3R -3R -4R -5R -6R -4R -1R -2R -2R -1R -1R -1R -1R -1R 4 creation date:6/23/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L010.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 23, 2021 3:58 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/23/2021 date:6/23/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS PLAN1 L010 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDREMOVALS PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.AGGREGATE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2.TOPSOIL STOCKPILE AREA 3.TREE PROTECTION FENCE, TYPICAL 4.EROSION CONTROL FENCE, TYPICAL PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. REMOVAL KEY KEY DESCRIPTION R1 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED R2 EXISTING HOUSE TO BE DEMOLISHED R3 EXISTING PAVER DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED R4 EXISTING PAVING TO BE REMOVED R5 EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED R6 EXISTING LANDSCAPE WALL TO BE REMOVED -R POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW SITE ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES 1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0% TYPICAL R-1 SETBACKS N.T.S. EXISTING HOMEOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWACACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POBBENCH16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH 5 66 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKRISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN2RISRDN 4RISRDN 4 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 9'-4" 9" 10'-4"18'-6"19'-9"28'-1" 12'-9"30'-4"13'36'-10" 1 1 UPPER POOL TERRACE LOWER POOL TERRACE SPA TERRACE LOWER LEVEL TERRACE DRIVEWAY AUTO COURT MECH. AREA LAWN PLINTH LAWN LAWN LAWN DOG RUN 2 2 ENTRY TERRACE 31'-3"1'-5"creation date:6/24/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 24, 2021 2:07 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/24/2021 date:6/24/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE LAYOUT PLAN1 L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT 2.PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. PROPOSED NEW TREE POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW STAIRDNUP GAS METERGAS WATER METERWTR AIR CONDITIONER UNITAC GEN.GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING EXISTING FRONT SETBACK 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM A-TYPICAL RESTRICTIONS N.T.S.OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POBBENCH16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH 5 66 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKRISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 9'-4" 9" 10'-4"18'-6"19'-9"28'-1" 12'-9"30'-4"13'36'-10" 1 1 UPPER POOL TERRACE LOWER POOL TERRACE SPA TERRACE LOWER LEVEL TERRACE DRIVEWAY AUTO COURT MECH. AREA LAWN PLINTH LAWN LAWN LAWN DOG RUN 2 2 ENTRY TERRACE 31'-3"1'-5"creation date:6/24/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 24, 2021 2:07 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/24/2021 date:6/24/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE LAYOUT PLAN1 L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT 2.PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. PROPOSED NEW TREE POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW STAIRDNUP GAS METERGAS WATER METERWTR AIR CONDITIONER UNITAC GEN.GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES 1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0%OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWACACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POBBENCH16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH 5 66 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKRISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN2RISRDN 4RISRDN 4 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 9'-4" 9" 10'-4"18'-6"19'-9"28'-1" 12'-9"30'-4"13'36'-10" 1 1 UPPER POOL TERRACE LOWER POOL TERRACE SPA TERRACE LOWER LEVEL TERRACE DRIVEWAY AUTO COURT MECH. AREA LAWN PLINTH LAWN LAWN LAWN DOG RUN 2 2 ENTRY TERRACE 31'-3"1'-5"creation date:6/24/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 24, 2021 2:07 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/24/2021 date:6/24/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE LAYOUT PLAN1 L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT 2.PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. PROPOSED NEW TREE POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW STAIRDNUP GAS METERGAS WATER METERWTR AIR CONDITIONER UNITAC GEN.GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION HERITAGE TREES PRESERVED 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCE N.T.S.OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LI N E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0%OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES 1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0%OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWACACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POBBENCH16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH 5 66 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKRISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN2RISRDN 4RISRDN 4 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 9'-4" 9" 10'-4"18'-6"19'-9"28'-1" 12'-9"30'-4"13'36'-10" 1 1 UPPER POOL TERRACE LOWER POOL TERRACE SPA TERRACE LOWER LEVEL TERRACE DRIVEWAY AUTO COURT MECH. AREA LAWN PLINTH LAWN LAWN LAWN DOG RUN 2 2 ENTRY TERRACE 31'-3"1'-5"creation date:6/24/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 24, 2021 2:07 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/24/2021 date:6/24/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE LAYOUT PLAN1 L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT 2.PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. PROPOSED NEW TREE POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW STAIRDNUP GAS METERGAS WATER METERWTR AIR CONDITIONER UNITAC GEN.GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION HERITAGE TREES PRESERVED REQUESTED FRONT SETBACK 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCE N.T.S.OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LI N E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0%OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWAC ACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POB POT POTBENCHPOTPOT POT POT POT 16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH POT 5 66 CB CB CB CB CB CBCB CB CB CB 1:31.9% 2.6% 5.9%2.7%2.0%1:3 1:14 1 1 913.58BOW 924.83TOS POT POT NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK913.58BOS 1:3 915.67BOW 916.25TOW 918.30BOS 2.6%1:3910.00BOW 2.5% 924.92 924.50924.50 924.83TOS 924.50BOS 914.70 920.08±M.E. 924.00 924.92 924.25 914.50 914.70 914.50 914.70 922.17BOS 924.50TOS 924.75 924.75 922.17BOS 924.92 TOW: 927.75BOW:923.75 923.08BOS 924.75 924.75 924.50 924.83TOS 924.33 923.17BOS 919.00BOW 922.17BOW 914.50 TOW: 926.50BOW: 922.50 924.50TOS 921.92 924.67 924.83TOS 923.00 923.33 914.70 918.58±M.E. 918.33TOS 921.92TOS 922.42TOW 922.42TOW 915.92TOS 908.5BOS 921.67 924.00 919.33±M.E. 914.25BOW 912.00BOW 917.00BOW 919.50TOW 915.75BOW 923.17 922.92 918.00TOW RISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN 2RISRDN 4 RISRDN 4 923.08 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK914 923 915 921 912 912 913 914 915 916 911 918 919 920 920 910 922 921 916 922923 921 911 913 909 916910912914 918 917 917 919 918 7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 creation date:6/21/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/1. SCHEMATIC-SET/L101-SITE PLAN-1.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 21, 2021 3:31 PMGENERAL NOTES 1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES. 2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO. 3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR, AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/ PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVE LOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS. 4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FOR BOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING MUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR. 5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES. 7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPON REQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/21/2021 date:6/21/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 t 612 345 4275 SITE PLAN - OPTION 11 L101.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION 1 N 1" = 16'-0" SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet TOTAL HARDCOVER PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT 3,793.00 s.f. AUTOCOURT 2,714.00 s.f. ENTRY TERRACE 363.00 s.f. UPPER POOL TERRACE 1,720.00 s.f. LOWER POOL TERRACE AND STAIRS 934.00 s.f. WALKOUT TERRACE 1,163.00 s.f. GARAGE STOOP 98.00 s.f. LANDSCAPE STAIRS 120.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPOSED HARDCOVER 10,905.00 s.f. AREA OF PROPERTY 45,758 s.f. PROPOSED HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 23.83% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO ALLOWED BY CODE 25% HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO OVER ALLOWED -1.17% PROPOSED HARDCOVER AREA OVER ALLOWED -534.50 s.f. EXISTING HARDCOVER / PROPERTY AREA RATIO 0% EXISTING HARDCOVER AREA 0%OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWACACGEN. GAS&ELEC. POOL EQUIP.TRAFFIC FLOWTRAFFIC FLOW3 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 POBBENCH16'x40' POOL WATER ELEV: 921.75 8' DEPTH 5 66 1 1 NEIGHBORING STRUCTURE50' O.H.W. SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE30' FRONT SETBACKSTAUDER CIRCLE100 YEAR FLOOD PLAINPOND OHW: 907.60 10' SIDE YARD SETBACK PROPERTY LIN E HB 1 1 10' SIDE YARD S E T B A C K AVERAGE FRONT SETBACKRISR DN3 RISRDN 4 RISRDN 6 RISR DN 6 RISR DN 4 RISR DN 4 RISR DN1 RISR DN1 RISRDN 4RISRDN 2 RISR DN 2 RISR DN2RISRDN 4RISRDN 4 EXISTING HOUSE SETBACK7'x7' SPA GARAGE FFE: 924.50PROPOSED HOUSE FFE: 925.00 BFFE: 914.75 9'-4" 9" 10'-4"18'-6"19'-9"28'-1" 12'-9"30'-4"13'36'-10" 1 1 UPPER POOL TERRACE LOWER POOL TERRACE SPA TERRACE LOWER LEVEL TERRACE DRIVEWAY AUTO COURT MECH. AREA LAWN PLINTH LAWN LAWN LAWN DOG RUN 2 2 ENTRY TERRACE 31'-3"1'-5"creation date:6/24/2021filepath:/Users/travisvanlierestudio/Dropbox (TVLS)/PROJECTS (DROPBOX)/BACH-HARTLEY RESIDENCE/2. DWG/1. DRAWINGS/2. VARIANCE-SET/L101.dwglast saved:bretwieseler June 24, 2021 2:07 PMGENERAL NOTES1.SEE SHEET L001 FOR GENERAL NOTES.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR BUILDING INFO.3.ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR,AND IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE W/PAVING, CONCRETE, AND WALL CONTRACTORS ON SLEEVELOCATIONS UNDER DRIVEWAYS, WALKS, AND WALLS.4.REFER TO SHEET L010 - EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN FORBOUNDARY INFORMATION. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKINGMUST BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR.5.DO NOT SCALE THE DRAWINGS. WRITTEN DIMENSIONSARE TO BE USED FOR ALL LAYOUT WORK.6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES.7.ALL SITE ELEMENTS SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD ANDAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.8.AUTOCAD FILE AVAILABLE TO CONTRACTOR UPONREQUEST FOR FIELD LAYOUT. KEYNOTES 1.EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE(S) TYP. - SAVE AND PROTECT 2.EXISTING NEIGHBORING PROPERTY/SITE FEATURE - SAVE AND PROTECT 3.EXISTING CITY STREET/ALLEY - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 4.EXISTING CITY SIDEWALK - SAVE AND PROTECT, REPAIR ANY DAMAGED AREAS PER CITY STANDARDS 5.PROJECT POINT OF BEGINNING 6.EXISTING POWER POLE, TYPICAL - SAVE AND PROTECT The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics and specifications thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without the express written permission of Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, governement agencies, and vendors only in accordance with this notice. © Copyright 2021 Travis Van Liere Studio, LLC. All rights reserved. NOTE: license no: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 43728 T R A V I S V A N L I E R E Drawn By: Date: Scale: Drawing: 5 4 0 4 S T A U D E R C I R C L E , E D I N A , M N B A C H -H A R T L E Y R E S I D E N C E Sheet: 6/24/2021 date:6/24/2021 BW Rev #Description Date-ISSUED FOR VARIANCE 06.28.2021 N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N 211 1ST STREET NORTH, SUITE 350MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401t 612 345 4275 SITE LAYOUT PLAN1 L101 SITE LAYOUT PLAN N 1" = 16.0000001' SCALE: 1 inch = 0 16'32'8' 16 feet LEGEND SHEET NOTES 1.EXISTING HOUSE FOOTPRINT 2.PROPOSED HOUSE FOOTPRINT PROPERTY LINE SETBACK ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARKOHW EXISTING CONTOURSXXX LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONLOCN TREE PROTECTION FENCEXXX SILT FENCESFSF EXISTING FENCE DECID.CONIF.ORNM. EXISTING TREE TO BE SAVED AND PROTECTED DECID.CONIF.ORNM. PROPOSED NEW TREE POB POINT OF BEGINNING TRAFFIC FLOW TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW STAIRDNUP GAS METERGAS WATER METERWTR AIR CONDITIONER UNITAC GEN.GENERATOR TRASH CONTAINER POINT OF ENTRY AT BUILDING 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM STREET ELEVATION DIAGRAM APPROX. 101’APPROX. 66’ 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM MAIN LEVEL PLAN 3/32” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM LOWER LEVEL PLAN 3/32” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM NORTH ELEVATION 1/8” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM EAST ELEVATION 1/8” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM SOUTH ELEVATION + GARAGE ELEVATION 1/8” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM WEST ELEVATION 1/8” = 1’-0” 5404 STAUDER CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 ARCHITECTURE VARIANCE APPLICATION DATE: 07/14/2021 © 2021 PKA. ARCHITECTURE 2919 JAMES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55408 612.353.4920 WWW.PKARCH.COM VIEW FROM STREET VIEW FROM POND 3D VIEWS 5404 Stauder Circle Front yard setback variance for a new home same location EdinaMN.gov 2 EdinaMN.gov 3 EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 EdinaMN.gov 6 EdinaMN.gov 7 EdinaMN.gov 8 EdinaMN.gov 9 EdinaMN.gov 10 EdinaMN.gov 11 EdinaMN.gov 12 EdinaMN.gov 13 EdinaMN.gov 14 EdinaMN.gov 15 Date: July 14, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:Kris Aaker, As s is tant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-20, R ear yard and lot c o verage variance req uest for 6601 Bis cayne Blvd Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : D eny the variances as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he variances requested are for a 9 - foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5%, or a 277.55 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit for property located at 6601 B iscayne B lvd. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 7-8-21 Noon Staff Report Site Location Survey Narrative Plans Owner's Statement Variance s upport Lands cape Engineering Memo Staff Pres entation Applicant Pres entation Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 07 July 2021 Public Hearing Comments-6601 Biscayne Blvd Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 9-foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5% (277.55 square foot) building coverage variance at 6601 Biscayne Boulevard VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 3 RESPONSES 3 0 Registered 0 Unverified 3 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 3 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jim and Mary Vandervelde Q2.Address 6605 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment We are fully supportive of the Rubins' porch and deck project. We've fully reviewed the plans and we are comfortable that it will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and won't cause any issues. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Esther Connor Q2.Address 6600 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment Russ and Karen are excellent neighbors who take meticulous care of their property. We have seen their plans and this would enhance their property and our neighborhood. We fully support them in their request to proceed with their porch. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Leslie ( Les) Jones Q2.Address 6600 Parkwood Ln Q3.Comment I live directly behind the Rubin's. I have live there for about 20 years. The Rubin's were living in their house when we moved in. At the fence line between our two properties the Rubin's have a tall evergreen trees that offer a lot of privacy between the two properties. I have looked at their proposal to add a porch off the main level and a ground level deck. I think that these additions to their house would be great for the Rubin's without affecting my property in any way. When we moved in we added a four season porch and deck off of our main level which has added a lot of enjoyment to my family over the years. I support their proposal for a variance. They are reducing the building coverage ratio and the 9 ft variance for the rear yard set back will not change anything for the Joneses. The way it looks is that the porch is encroaching the rear set back, not the open decks so noise would not be any more of an issue. I look forward to see the addition built for the Rubin's. I'm sure their family will enjoy the new space just like Nancy and I have enjoyed our porch and deck. Nancy and Les Jones                 July 14, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-21-20, A variance request for rear yard setback and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement for a porch addition at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Information / Background: Property owners, Russel and Karen Rubin, have submitted a variance request for rear yard setback from the 25-foot requirement and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement for residential lots over 9,000 square feet. The variances requested are for a 9 - foot rear yard setback variance and a 1.5%, or a 229 square foot increase beyond the allowable 25% building coverage limit. The applicant is requesting to add a 382 sq ft porch addition and 150 sq ft deck to the back of the home into the rear yard while removing a deck and reducing the size of their existing 606 sq ft patio. The property is currently at 29.2% coverage, by 4.2% or 641 sq ft over the maximum allowable building coverage of 25%. The proposed project will reduce coverage by 2.7% or 412 sq ft, however, will continue to be over the coverage limit by 1.5% or 229 sq ft. even with the reduction of the patio, is still over the maximum building coverage allowed by code. The proposed building coverage is 26.5% of the lot area. The building coverage calculations include the house, patio (after the first 150 square feet), and attached shed. It does not include the driveway or sidewalk. The proposal will reduce existing coverage and move the property closer to compliance. The back wall of the home is at 45.5 feet to the rear lot line; in compliance with the minimum 25-foot rear yard setback requirement. The proposal is to reduce the required setback to be 16 ft from the rear lot line or a 35% reduction in setback. Decks and patios can be a minimum of 5 feet to the side or rear lot line, however, all portions of the principle structure must be no closer than 25 feet. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The existing 15,251.3 square foot corner lot is located in the southwest quadrant of Biscayne Blvd and Londonderry Road. The lot today is at 29.2% building coverage. The existing house accounts for 24% of the lot coverage with the existing 606 sq ft patio and 338 sq ft deck the remainder of coverage. The requested proposal increases the house to account for 26.5% building coverage or a 2.5% increase in principle building area. The existing home complies with coverage limits allowing for an addition of 154 sq ft of building or 236 sq ft if the attached shed is removed, (82.5 sq ft). Although the lot coverage percentage will be reduced, the principle building area of the lot is increasing with the proposal, while it is currently under the maximum. The existing home is conforming at 45.5 feet from the rear lot line allowing for a 20.5-foot extension into the rear yard. There is ample opportunity to maintain the rear yard setback. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control. An Engineering memo is attached. Compliance Table Principal Structure (House) City Standard Proposed West Side – East Side - South– North Side – 10 feet 15 feet 25 feet 31.4 feet 22 feet 28.4 feet 16 feet* 34.5 feet Building Coverage 25% 26.5%* *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues  Is the proposed variance justified? STAFF REPORT Page 3 Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. Staff questions if the proposal is reasonable. The existing home is well within the rear yard setback requirement of 25 ft allowing for a 20.5 ft extension into the back yard before required setback. Although the existing coverage conditions are greater than what the applicant is asking for, the requirement is the same percentage for all residential lots over 9,000 square feet in Edina. Building permits are not required for patios, and therefore situations where the building coverage is over 25% may occur without staff knowing, creating “existing conditions.” The property would be allowed an addition of 236 sq ft, (with shed removal), 25 feet from the back-lot line and have a deck or patio up to 150 square feet without a variance. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The percentage of building coverage is calculated the same for each lot over 9,000 square feet. The requirement is consistent throughout all residential properties over 9,000 square feet zoned R-1. The back wall of the home is 45.5 feet from the rear lot line allowing for a 20.5-foot addition into the rear yard. The design is a self-created condition with no unique property-based circumstance supporting the variance. The front yard setback is relatively standard, (the home is not located deep into the lot), the lot depth isn’t shallow and the rear lot line isn’t at an angle, so no physical unique challenges are identified supporting a rear yard setback variance. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Building coverage is treated the same throughout all neighborhoods in Edina. Lots greater than 9,000 square feet are allowed up to 25% building coverage and lots less than 9,000 square feet are allowed up to 30% building coverage. Each property in the neighborhood is expected to meet this requirement. Staff often hears from residents that projects appear to be over-built and massive even under the current code. Lot coverage and massing are issues continually raised when discussing “neighborhood character” with less massing and coverage the preference of residents. Recommended Action: Staff cannot support the variances requested for rear yard setback and to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. It is especially difficult for staff to support or recommend approval of a variance from the code to exceed the building coverage requirement. Staff doesn’t believe there are unique circumstances to the subject property. Staff’s recommendation for denial of the requested variance is based on the following findings:  Historically staff has not recommended approval of lot coverage variances based on all lot coverage requirements being calculated the same on all single-family residential lots. STAFF REPORT Page 4  Variances must be based on the unique characteristics of a lot and not on an owner’s use of the property.  Approving the variances sets a precedent that could affect surrounding properties and neighborhoods with similar lot size and configurations. Deadline for a city decision August 5, 2021. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 660 1 Bi scayne July 1, 202 1 1 in = 94 f t / 16'-0"9'-0"PROPOSED SETBACK 3308 Gorham Avenue St. Louis Park MN 55426 | chris@christopherstrom.com | 612.961.9093 | christopherstrom.com VARIANCE DOCUMENTATION– 6601 BISCAYNE 7.1.2021 Architect’s Statement This project involves removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The purpose is to allow enjoyment of their back yard from the upper level without relying on stairs, as the owners (aged 70 and 72) intend to age-in-place. This application is for two variances to Edina Zoning Code: LOT COVERAGE: An increase of 1.5% over the allowed 25% lot coverage (Current lot coverage is 29.2% so this project would be a net reduction to 26.5%). REAR YARD SETBACK: Principal Buildings have a 25-foot minimum. Decks have a 5-foot minimum. For this covered deck, we are asking for a 9-foot deviation between the required and provided setback (16 feet from the property line) We believe that a granted variance will: A. Relieve practical difficulties. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE: 1. The proposed use is reasonable but there are difficulties in complying with the code, including functional and aesthetic concerns. 2. The current lot coverage is 29.2%, due to the rambler (1-story) style. Because of this style of low- slung home, main-floor additions for “one-level living” are technically prohibited, even though the home has very modest proportions compared to others in the neighborhood. 3. The sloping yard is not accessible for lesser-abled people. Please find the attached supporting documents: i) Owner Statement of home alterations to facilitate Aging in Place. ii) ‘Section Diagram Grade Change’: illustrating lack of accessibility to yard for lesser-abled people. iii) Comparative ADA accessibility requirements (slope) for accommodating people with low mobility. iv) Research supporting the importance of access to the outdoors. v) Excerpts from Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 4 ’Housing’ acknowledging the need to be flexible to accommodate the aging demographic that is currently under-served. vi) Excerpts from Edina’s Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 12 ‘Community Health’ demonstrating Edina’s commitment to their aging demographic. Page 2 of 4 REGARDING REAR SETBACK 1. The house was built before the 25% lot coverage rule had been adopted. The rambler does facilitate one-level living, however, it does not allow room for a covered outdoor space. 2. Recognizing a large discrepancy between the 5’ setback for Decks, and the 25’ setback for a Screened Porch (both fall under ‘Principal Building’), we believe that it is in keeping with the integrity of the neighborhood to have an intermediate point between the two. The proposed Porch is 16.5’ away at its corner point and doesn’t reach its full width until 23’ from the property line. We think this holds a beautiful proportion and suitable intermediary between the 5’ Deck setback and the 25’ house setback. 3. Being a corner property with more restrictive setbacks, the lot has a more limited construction area than its neighbors, with a “dual front yard setback” common to a corner lot. B. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district REGARDING LOT COVERAGE AND REAR SETBACK: 1. One-story “ramblers” are part of the identity of Edina, especially this fine example built by Carl Hanson. More and more of them get torn down every year, replaced by 2-story homes that may have a lesser “lot coverage” but are much more massive in scale. This existing home is very low- slung and unimposing, yet the particulars of the “lot coverage” calculation make it impossible to add-on to without a variance. This modest home would continue to be modest with this small addition of a screened porch. Variances are intended to accommodate projects that support the intent of comprehensive city plan, yet do not meet the numerical specifics of the zoning code. We doubt that neighbors would find this project at odds with larger city goals for development. If this variance is not granted, then the livability of the home will be compromised for these owners and make it more likely that the home would be sold, torn down and replaced with a bulkier building. C. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE: 1. Aesthetic improvement/ modernizing exterior components i) See rendering images ii) Neighbor’s support of intended improvements; statements to be forthcoming 2. Diminishing likelihood of tear-down by means of increasing owner commitment to reside in current residence as long as possible, increasing property value thus making it less appealing for future tear-down purchase, and increasing live-ability to potential future families i) Owner’s statement indicating dedication & continued intent to maintain and improve property ii) Project value: $215,000 3. Willingness to surrender rights to future pool/tennis court via easement incorporated into title or other approved method. Page 3 of 4 4. Neighborhood bulk comparison as illustration of compatibility/ reasonableness REGARDING REAR SETBACK: Willingness to surrender rights to future pool/tennis court via easement incorporated into title or other approved method. – On the next page is shown the 4 adjoining properties at the corner of Biscayne and Londonderry, illustrating the proximity to site-lines and size of footprint allowed a pool, compared to the proposed off-ground structure (hatched) Page 4 of 4 D. Not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. REGARDING LOT COVERAGE & REAR SETBACK: 1. New covered deck & outdoor deck barely visible from the road i) See rendering images. 2. Diminishing likelihood of tear-down i) (See C-2) E. Additional considerations 1. Improvement of drainage on-site i) See Landscape plan 2. Reducing Lot-coverage percentage by means of this proposed outdoor space. i) See Survey and ‘Existing and Proposed Site Plans’ ii) Supporting images of prior Lot Coverage reduction by Owner. 3. Open Deck minimally sized to the 150 s.f. allowance number. Covered/ screened Deck at 382 s.f. is more valuable for elderly demographic by virtue of its protective components against the elements and nature. Thank you for your consideration and review of this request. 878877876A 2 3 1 B D C 4 N NEAREST CATCH BASIN LOCATED AT NORTH-EAST CORNER OF PROPERTY @ LONDONDERRY x BISCAYNE PER W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING SURVEY FROM 10/06/2020 877' -0"878' - 0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"LONDONDERRY ROADEQUIPMENT ACCESSEXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 NEW RAISED DECK NEW COVERED PORCH REMOVE EXISTING RAISED DECK REMOVE EXISTING STAIRS AND LANDING 36" DECIDUOUS 36" DECIDUOUS TOPOGRAPHY: NO CHANGE COORDINATE DRAINAGE w/ LANDSCAPING CONSULTANT TREE PROTECTION FENCE TO BE TEMPORARILY REMOVED FOR CONCRETE AND STEEL WORK ONLY TREE PROTECTION FENCE - TO BE TEMPORARILY REMOVED FOR CONCRETE AND STEEL WORK ONLY 3' - 0"DI AME T E R , T Y P . 1 3 ' - 6 " REMOVE EXISTING PATIO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A0.0 TITLE SHEET & SITE PLAN 11/13/17 GENERAL CONTRACTOR CROWN CONSTRUCTION 5249 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55422 CONTACT: WILLIE ANDERSON PHONE: (612) 838-1899 CLIENT RUSS AND KAREN RUBIN 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 CONTACT: RUSS RUBIN PHONE: (763) 370-2767 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER A.M. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 112 EAST MAPLE ST. RIVER FALLS, WI 54022 CONTACT: DAVID WAGNER PHONE: (612) 290-8509 ARCHITECT CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 3308 GORHAM AVE. ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER STROM PHONE: (612) 961-9093 SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN PERSPECTIVE IMAGE FOR IMPRESSION & COLOR INTENTION ONLY. REFER TO 2D DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES 1. WILLIE ANDERSON OF CROWN CONSTRUCTION IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCEOF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS AND CAN BE REACED AT (612) 838-1899 2. THE STREET WILL BE SWEPT CLEAN BEFORE THE END OF EACH DAY OF ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION, WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED INTO THE STREET. 3. AREAS WITH SLOPES GREATER THAN 3 TO 1 AND AREAS NEXT TO WETLANDS/WATERBODIES GRADED OR EXPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH TEMPORARY VEGETATION, MULCHING, OR OTHER MEANS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL 4. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WILL BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. UNWORKED SOILS THAT REMAIN EXPOSED AND NOT IN USE FOR LONGER THAN 14 DAYS WILL BE COVERED WITH TEMPORARY SEED (GRASS, OATS, OR WHEAT) 5. NO CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR ON SITE UNLESS IT IS DONE WITH AN APPROVED MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE OR STANDARD. 6. STOCKPILES SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH ADEQUATE PERIMITER CONTROL TO PREVENT SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION. 7. INLET PROTECTION FOR ALL STORM SEWER INLETS DOWNSTREAM OF THE SITE WITHIN ONE BLOCK OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY. 8. SITE SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AT ALL TIMES AND REFUSE PROPERLY CONTROLLED. 9. TEMPORARY PUMPING SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE USE OF AN APPROVED MINNESTOA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) DEVICE OR STANDARD. 10. SOIL COMPACTION SHALL BE MINIMIZED; AREAS OF COMPACTED SOIL WILL BE REMOVED OR LOOSENED VIA TILLING TO A DEPTH NO LESS THAN 6 INCHES. 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND AFTER ANY RAINFALL GREATER THAN 1" ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND MAKE ANY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY. AN INSPECTION LOG SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE DETAILING THESE INSPECTIONS AND REPAIRS PERFORMED. 12. PLACE NEW, ORGANIC RICH TOPSOIL TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 4" ON AREAS OF DISTURBANCE. 13. PLACE SOD OR SEED AND MULCH ON EXPOSED SOILS AS SOON AS PRACTICAL. SHEET INDEX A0.0 TITLE SHEET & SITE PLAN A1.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN A1.3 ROOF PLAN A2.1 ELEVATIONS A6.1 PORCH DETAILS A6.2 PORCH DETAILS 2 S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS S1.2 FRAMING PLANS S1.3 ROOF FRAMING PLAN S1.4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 1 S1.5 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 2 S1.6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 3 & LETTER No.Description Date 6 Permit Comments 5/11/2021 UP A N A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B D C 4 TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TRUNK TREADS3' - 2"15 ' - 3 "15 ' - 0 " 1 3' - 3"GRI DLI NE TO I NTERSECTI ON HOUSE1 8' - 2 1 5/32" 1 1 ' - 1 0 9/32"16' - 6"1 ' - 4 3/4"GRI DLI NE TO I NTERSECTI ON HOUSE4' - 1 3/1 6"65°65° COORDINATE DRAINAGE w/ LANDSCAPING CONSULTANT DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK 3 ' - 6 1/2 " HEAVY DASHED LINE REPRESENTS DRAINABLE RIVER ROCK UNDER DECK - COORDINATE COLOR/SIZE w/ OWNER HOUSE CORNER TO GRID LINE 13' - 0 3/4" 877' - 4 13/16" EXISTING GRADE 18" SONOTUBES THESE FOOTINGS SEE 1/A6.2 • 10" SONOTUBES BELLED TO 16". T.O. FTG BELOW GRADE, SEE A6.1 • w/ 4 x 4 AC2 CEDARTONE POSTS SEE A6.1 P.T. 2 x 12 AC2 CEDARTONE 12 ' - 8 3 /8 "2 ' - 6 5 /8 "C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSGRIDLINE TO GRIDLINE AT HOUSE 16' - 9 15/16" GRIDLINE TO GRIDLINE AT HOUSE 16' - 6 3/4" HOUSE CORNER TO GRID LINE 5' - 4 5/16" FRAMING SEE S1.2 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.1 GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 10/26/17 GENERAL NOTES -FLOOR PLANS 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING OR FOUNDATION WALL, U.N.O. 2. REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR LOAD BEARING LOCATIONS AND ADDITIONAL DETAILS OR SECTIONS. 3. PLUMBING WALLS ARE TO BE 2 x 6 FRAMING. ANY PLUMBING WALLS THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 4. MECHANICAL DUCTS TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN FLOOR TRUSS SYSTEM, U.N.O. FLOOR TRUSS MFG. TO VERIFY LOCATIONS. 5. ANY DROPPED CEILINGS REQUIRED FOR DUCTWORK WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ARE TO BE APPROVED BY ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 6. ALL KNEE WALLS TO BE 2 x 4 FRAMING, U.N.O. SEE WALL SECTIONS FOR INSULATION LOCATIONS. SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 GROUND LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/2021 DN A KITCHENDININGOFFICEHALL DECK COVERED DECK SHED BELOW JOTUL GF 370 STOVE (BLACK)w/ BLACK REFLECTIVE PANEL. REMOTE CONTROLLED. STOVE PIPE TO RUN STRAIGHT. STEEL POST, TYP. SEE STRUCTURAL 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, PTD 2X4 FLANKING CEDAR MULLIONS TO ACCEPT SCREEN PANELS, PTD DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK STAIR: 17R @ 6 1/2", 16T @ 12" FASCIA TO BEAM CONNECTION 887' - 1 3/16" 887' - 0" IN-FLOOR WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE BOXES, TYP. PLACE IN JOIST SPACE. 7 THUS A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B B D D C 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISH C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSwww wUPLIGHT BK LIGHTING 'DELTA STAR', WIDE BEAM HAIKU FAN w/ LIGHT HAIKU FAN w LIGHT RED DOT GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET TH AIR VENT THERMOSTAT 2 A6.1 6 A6.1 5 A6.1 D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N N O V IS IB L E S E A M S N O V IS IB L E S E A M SwTH LEGEND REPLACE EXISTING CANTILEVER DECKING AND RAILING TO MATCH NEW DECK. BAMDECK 4G COFFEE N OPEN CORNERS: NO CABLE RAILING AT EXTERIOR CORNERS F L U S H EQ. EEQ. EEQ. EEQ. E3' - 7 5/8"GLASS HEAT SHIELD BY OWNER @ BACK OF STOVE EDGE OF DECKING 6 3/8" GRID TO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 1 Stove Location 3/22/2021 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 A A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 1 3/4" / 12"1 3/4" / 12"2 3 1 B D C 4 AIRVENT POWERVENT, SEE 4/A6.1 RIDGE VALLEY GUTTER SYSTEM AROUND ENTIRE ROOF, MATCH EXISTING DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK 2 A6.1 5 A6.1 END GUTTERS AT F.O. HOUSEEND GUTTERS AT F.O. HOUSE KICKOUT FLASHING BELOW KICKOUT FLASHING BELOW 898' -6"B.O. CENTRAL BEAM APPX. LOCATION EXIST. PLUMBING STACK DECK BELOW STAIR BELOW CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.3 ROOF PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 B DC OPEN CORNER, NO DECKING, NO CABLE RAILING. TYP @ PORCH EXTERIOR COLUMNS FULLY ADHERED EPDM ROOFING STOVE CHIMNEY CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM, MATCH EXISTING HSS BEAMS BELOW DECK MEMBERS, SEE S1.2 BAMDECK FASCIA AIRVENT POWERVENT, SEE 4/A6.1 DOWNSPOUT SCREEN PANELS, TYP. UPPER PANELS, U.N.O. SCREEN PANELS, TYP. LOWER PANELS SOLID MDO PANEL w/ STILE& RAIL TO MATCH SCREEN PANELS EQ. D 3' - 10 5/16"EQ. DEQ. D3' - 2 3/16"2' - 9 3/16"2' - 8 11/16"2' - 3 11/16"2' - 3 1/4"1' - 10 3/16"2' - 7 3/4"2' - 1"1' - 6 1/4"SEE PLAN EQ. E1' - 5 5/8"2' - 0 3/8"2' - 7 1/8"3' - 1 7/8"D3 D6 D2 D5 D1 D4 E4 E7 E3 E6 E2 E5 E19 1/4"2 2 3 3 1 1 DOWNSPOUT OPEN CORNER, NO DECKING, NO CABLE RAILING. TYP @ PORCH EXTERIOR COLUMNS FULLY ADHERED EPDM ROOFING STOVE CHIMNEY CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM, MATCH EXISTING HSS BEAMS BELOW DECK MEMBERS, SEE S1.2 SCREEN PANELS, TYP. UPPER PANELS, U.N.O. SCREEN PANELS, TYP. LOWER PANELS FASCIA-MOUNTED CABLE RAILING SYSTEM, SEE A6.1 CEDAR MULLION CABLE RAILING SYSTEM, SEE A6.1 CABLE RAILING TERMINATED AT METAL PLATE GALV. L4x4x10" ANGLE w/ 2 1/2 DIA. x3" KWIKBOLTS INTO FTGS & 2- 1/2" DIA. x 3" LAG SCREWS INTO STRINGERS STRUT, SEE STRUCTURAL FASCIA MOUNTED CABLE RAILING CONTINUOUS OUTSIDE STAIR TO DECK2' - 3 3/8"EQ. C EQ. C EQ. C 4' - 5 1/4"1' - 10 3/16"2' - 3 13/16"2' - 9 1/16"2' - 9 1/2"3' - 2 11/16"C3C2C1 C6C5C4 BDC EXISTING HOME SEE 2/A2.1SEE 2/A2.1 FOR SIZES 2- P.T. 2x10 4 x 4 P.T. POSTS AC2 CEDARTONE H2.5 TIES 2- EA. SIDE INT. STRINGERS 1- INSIDE EXT. STRINGER ACE 6 CAPS BD EXISTING HOME SEE STRUCTURAL & A6.1 FOR FLOOR ASSEMBLY CUSTOM WOOD DOOR w SCREEN PANELS SOLID MDO PANEL w/ STILE& RAIL TO MATCH EZ PORCH TRANSOMS DOWNSPOUT TYP. LOWER PANELS6' - 9"EQ. A 3' - 10 5/16"EQ. A EQ. A ALIGN NON-STRUCTURAL BEAM w/ EXISTING FASCIA EQ. B 3' - 4 7/8"EQ. B2' - 11"1' - 4 1/16"1' - 0 1/4"MDO PANEL3' - 2 5/8"2' - 9 9/16"2' - 9 1/16"2' - 3 15/16"2' - 3 7/16"1' - 10 5/16"1' - 9 1/8"1' - 4 9/16"11 3/4"7 1/4"A1 A6 A2 A5 A3 A4 B1 B4 B2 B3 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A2.1 ELEVATIONS 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 West Elevation SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"3 South Elevation SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"4 East Elevation Deck SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"2 East Elevation Porch NOTE: SCREEN WALLS ARE NOT SHOWN. SEE PLANS AND SECTIONS FOR DETAILS. No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 CENTER OF COLUMNS 2 4 2 42102 42 4 2x4 CONTINUES AT TOP & BOTTOM FOR EZE-BREEZE FLANGE SUPPORT FLANGE LOCATION OF EZE-BREEZE PANEL (OUTSIDE MOUNT) VARIES 2 10 2 4 2 4 VARIESD 3 CABLE RAILING TERMINATED AT 3" x 3/8" WELDED METAL PLATE 4' - 3 1/2" TALL BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARD AROUND DECK PERIMETER BAMDECK 4G DECKING CABLE RAILING 2x4 @ BOTTOM 2222222222 22 OPTION: FLANGE TRIM 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, MITERED AT INTERIOR UNINTERRUPTED HSS COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURALCENTER OF COLUMNS2x2 @ BOTTOM FLOOR OUTLET, LOCATED PER PLAN DASHES INDICATE EZ-PORCH UNITS HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURALCENTER OF COLUMNSD 2 422 2 422 VERTICAL 3-TRACKN.T.S.NON-STRUCTURAL BEAM w/ CEDAR TRIM EA. SIDE, VERIFY DEPTH OF EXISTING HOUSE FASCIA. TRIM PTD TO MATCH EZ PORCH 2x4 CONTINUES AT CEDAR MULLIONS FOR EZ PORCH UNIT FLANGE SUPPORT FLANGE LOCATION OF EZE-BREEZE PANEL (OUTSIDE MOUNT) 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, CONTINUOUS TO FASCIA TRD 2x SEE STRUCTURAL BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD 6 3/8" x 3/8" BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARD AROUND DECK PERIMETER BAMDECK 4G DECKING, COFFEE ALIGN HSS COLUMN, SEE STRUCTURAL 2 422 2 422 SLOPING HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURAL SLOPED SHEATHING FULLY ADHERED EPDM FIXED WINDOWN.T.S.2x FRAMING, SEE STRUCTURAL WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING IN 'SINGLE MALT' LADDER FRAMING WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING CABLE RAILING, ATTACHED AT METAL PLATE- OPEN SIDE NO CAP 210INSECT SCREEN BELOW DECKING DASHES INDICATE EZ-PORCH UNIT HSS HEIGHTN.T.S.FOOTING, SEE STRUCTURAL T.O. FTG 6" BELOW GRADE212212CONTINUOUS GUTTER SYSTEM: MATCH EXISTING ON HOME A L I G N 2 4ALIGN212 BRUSHED-ON MASTIC @ CONNECTIONS RIVER-ROCK OVER FOOTING GRADE 212212212R-38 CLOSED CELL SPRAY FOAM INSULATION CEDAR TRIM PTD TO MATCH EZ PORCH HSS BEAM, SEE STRUCTURAL BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD 6 3/8" x 3/8" ALIGN CENTER OF COLUMNS3' - 0"EQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQEQSPACING TO MATCH CABLE RAIL AT PORCH (PORCH HAS CABLE AT 3' - 0")210WELDED FIN @ EA. RAILING POST 1 210HSS HEIGHTN.T.S.2 4 6 7/8" ENSURE MIN. CLEARANCE AT STAIR (C) FOOTING, SEE STRUCTURAL T.O. FTG 6" BELOW GRADE BRUSHED-ON MASTIC @ CONNECTIONS RIVER-ROCK OVER FOOTING GRADE GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET NOT SHOWN, SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION 3/4 X 1 1/2 POSTS 1X2" METAL GRASPABLE TOP RAIL WELDED TO POSTS SQUARE EDGE BOARD FASCIA 3x6 BAR 1 1/2" THICK, FASTENERS 4" APART EXISTING HOME REMOVE GUTTER AT EXISTING FASCIA, PORCH INTERIOR ONLY AIRVENT POWER VENT 'ASRHPGR' DUCT 'METAL SQUARE' GRILL BY REGGIO REGISTERS WOODTONE FINELINE PANELING CONTINUED FROM CEILING DIRECTION. DESIGN INTENT: 'FOLD' DOWN FROM CEILING COLOR-MATCHED METAL OVER ICE & WATER SHIELD FULLY ADHERED EPDM FLASHING @ POWER VENT PER MFR. LAP ROOFING OVER COLOR MATCHED METAL BLOCKING AS REQUIRED EXISTING SIDING TO REMAIN 210212282x8 LEDGER w/ 2- ROWS 1/4" x 3 1/2" SDS SCREWS @ 16" O.C. 3- SIMPSON LUS28-2 (DOUBLE 2x12'S) 2- SIMPSON LUS28 (SINGLE 2x12'S) SEAT CUT ALL BAMDECK SQUARE EDGE BOARDS BAMDECK FASCIA BOARD OFFSET 3/8" 2 4 NOTE: P.T. AC-2 CEDARTONE FOR ALL STAIR LUMBER CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A6.1 PORCH DETAILS 24/02/2021 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"1 Plan Detail SCALE :1" = 1'-0"5 Section Detail Porch SCALE :1" = 1'-0"6 Section Detail Deck SCALE :1" = 1'-0"3 Railing detail Deck SCALE :1" = 1'-0"2 Section Detail Roof SCALE :1" = 1'-0"4 Top Stair Connection No.Description Date 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 RIVER ROCK OVER RECESSED FOOTING, SIM 5/A6.1 FASCIA BD @ STRINGER BEYOND STAIR TREADS NOT SHOWN ANGLE BEYOND @ T.O. FOOTING RECESSED FOOTING REFERENCE IMAGE SHOWING RECESSED FOOTING CONCEPT FOOTING RECESS @ OUTSIDE EDGE & FRONT (EXPOSED LOCATIONS) STAIR STRINGER & ANGLE IN PLACE OF POST & POST BASE CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A6.2 PORCH DETAILS 2 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"1 Footing Detail at First Tread No.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 STAIR FOOTINGS SHOWN ON S1.2 & A1.1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLAN No.Description Date FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION RUN COLUMN LONG FOR UPTURNED BEAM CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.2 FRAMING PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FLOOR FRAMING PLAN DETAIL T UPTURNEDUPTURNEDUPTURNEDNo.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION FILL INTERIOR & SPRAY FOAM AROUND HSS @ HOUSE CONNECTION TO REDUCE CONDENSATION CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.3 ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 ROOF FRAMING PLAN No.Description Date SEE A6.1 FOR RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE SEE A6.1 FOR RELATIONSHIP TO GRADE CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.4 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 1 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"A DETAIL A SCALE :1" = 1'-0"C DETAIL C SCALE :1" = 1'-0"D DETAIL D SCALE :1" = 1'-0"E DETAIL E SCALE :1" = 1'-0"F DETAIL F SCALE :1" = 1'-0"B DETAIL B Revised FOOTING CONNECTION • Please note that the center line of pier needs to fall within ½”of centerline of column. Otherwise, the post-installed fasteners will be too close to the edge of concrete. • May use the same fastener at detail ‘A’ as specified in the revised detail ‘B’.Only 4 fasteners are still required at detail ‘A’. SEE 'DETAIL B REVISED' SCALE :1" = 1'-0"G DETAIL G Revised No.Description Date 3 ASI 1 Footing Connection 5/4/2021 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.5 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 2 SCALE :1" = 1'-0"H DETAIL H SCALE :1" = 1'-0"J DETAIL J SCALE :1" = 1'-0"K DETAIL K SCALE :1" = 1'-0"L DETAIL L SCALE :1" = 1'-0"M DETAIL M SCALE :1" = 1'-0"P DETAIL P SCALE :1" = 1'-0"Q DETAIL Q SCALE :1" = 1'-0"N DETAIL N No.Description Date CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.6 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 3 & LETTER SCALE :1" = 1'-0"S DETAIL S SCALE :1" = 1'-0"R DETAIL R SCALE :1" = 1'-0"T DETAIL T No.Description Date 5 ASI 3 Upturned Beams 5/11/202 1 We have been living at 6601 Biscayne Blvd. for 28 years. We fell in love with the neighborhood in 1993 and committed ourselves to rehabilitating the existing low-slung structure. The home was in complete disrepair when we purchased it and we had to live in temporary housing for a few months while the home was made habitable. Since that date, we have been good stewards of our home. It is intended to be our forever home. We are thoroughly rooted here: Our children were raised here and went through the French Immersion program until they graduated high school. We constantly updated the house with attentive maintenance. The reason we are asking for this variance is clear: we would like to add an accessible covered deck which would allow us outdoor use of our property while aging in place. In the past ten years, we moved parents passed away since that time, but we saw the detrimental impact of moving at an advanced age. Now, with the pandemic, we have seen where they were locked down and isolated from their families. We began to discuss what it would take for us to continue to live in our home for as long as possible. Karen turns 72 this year and Russ turns 70. Clearly, aging in place with one floor living was the key. Due to our modifications, all of our basic needs (bedroom, bathroom, den and kitchen) are easily accessed in a wheelchair. (Karen was in a wheelchair for 10 months in 2010-11 following multiple leg surgeries.) We decided that adding a screened porch and replacing our deteriorating deck via main floor access would allow us to leverage our yard and neighborhood as our mobility decreases. The 382 sf screened outdoor space would allow us more protection from sun and mosquitos than the previous uncovered deck, ensuring that we would not feel locked in our home when we go into the next decade or two. This would be the capstone to having a home that would make us safe, happy, and add to our health for the foreseeable future. If such an -evaluate our capacity to age in place in this home. We understand that there are community standards and rules. We believe our modest proposed project does as much good for us personally as for the neighborhood as a whole. We would consider this proposed enclosed porch the crown jewel of our property; the attached documents should prove our commitment and willingness to forego other site components that could add to our property (such as patio, swimming pool, tennis court). We have been good citizens & are dedicated to the community. Russ was Treasurer for Normandale French Elementary. Later on, he became Chair of the Edina Arts and Culture Commission. Karen has been active in the Friends of the Edina Library and is almost a full time volunteer for several community groups. We have loved being an integral part of this neighborhood and hope to continue this for as long as possible. Thank you for your consideration and for giving us a chance to truly make this house our forever home. Russ and Karen Rubin Before After 3. 1993 2021 06.04.2021 C1i Rendering Image RUBIN SCREEN PORCH: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE 8858798808828838848848788778768868868878668858798808828838848848788778768868868878668 7 7 ' -0 "878' -0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N N PATIO REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 380 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,038.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 26.5% PROPOSED OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 380 S.F. CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 06/04/2021 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN MAIN LEVEL FIN FL @ 887.1 100' -0" BASEMENT FIN FL 90' -9" GRADE AT ENTRY 882 883 884 885 886 ~877 -6 GARAGE BEYONDMAIN LIVING LEVEL GRADE AT EAST OF HOUSE 879 880 881 882 883883 882 881 880 879 878 BASEMENT w/ SOUTH WALKOUT DRIVEWAY BEYOND YARD 881 NORTH to BISCAYNE BLVD. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 4:02:22 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1ii SECTION DIAGRAM GRADE CHANGE 3/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/2021 RUBIN SCREEN PORCH C4: Neighborhood Bulk Comparison 6616 BISCAYNE BLVD (WEST) 6616 BISCAYNE BLVD (SOUTH)6612 BISCAYNE BLVD 6604 BISCAYNE BLVD6600 BISCAYNE BLVD (SOUTH)5721 LONDONDERRY RD (SOUTH) 5720 NEWPORT DR (SOUTH) 5721 LONDONDERRY RD (WEST) 5717 LONDONDERRY RD 6601 DOVRE DR (EAST) 6605 BISCAYNE BLVD 6609 BISCAYNE BLVD 6613 BISCAYNE BLVD 6617 BISCAYNE BLVD 6621 BISCAYNE BLVD 6625 BISCAYNE BLVD 6629 BISCAYNE BLVD 6509 BISCAYNE BLVD6505 BISCAYNE BLVD 5717 CONTINENTAL DR 6600 PARKWOOD LN (EAST) 5713 CONTINENTAL DR 6515 BISCAYNE BLVD 6519 BISCAYNE BLVD (NORTH) 6519 BISCAYNE BLVD (WEST) 5720 NEWPORT DR (EAST) 6501 BISCAYNE BLVD 5717 NEWPORT DRIVE (WEST) 5717 NEWPORT DRIVE (SOUTH) 5716 CONTINENTAL DR (EAST) 5716 CONTINENTAL DR (SOUTH) 6600 BISCAYNE BLVD (EAST) 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD (EAST) Dovre Dr Biscayne Blvd Londonberry RdContinental DrNewport Dr5717 5721 5720 5717 5716 5713 57176501 N^ 6505650965156519 6601 6600 6601 6600 66056609661366176621 6625 6629 660466126616 Before: front corner view of home, looking SE Before: back view of home, looking NW Before: back view of home, looking NW After: front corner view of home, looking SE After: back view of home, looking NW After: back view of home, looking NW proposed porch proposed porch proposed porch RUBIN SCREEN PORCH D1i: Visibility from the Road APPROXIMATED PORCH LOCATION -BEYOND GARAGE (DASHED), NOT ANTICIPATED TO BE VISIBLE FROM ROAD DUE TO PERSPECTIVE. SEE 3/A2.1 FOR ELEVATION, D1i FOR PERSPECTIVE 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD 6605 BISCAYNE BLVD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD.6600 PARKWOOD LANE APPROXIMATED PORCH LOCATION -BEYOND FOLIAGE (DASHED), ANTICIPATED TO BE BARELY VISIBLE FROM ROAD DUE TO FOLIAGE. SEE 4/A2.1 FOR ELEVATION, D1i FOR PERSPECTIVE CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 7:08:24 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH D1 NEIGHBORHOOD ELEVATIONS 1/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/21 SCALE :1/16" = 1'-0"1 North Elevation SCALE :1/16" = 1'-0"2 East Elevation Scale: 1” = 8’ 0’4’8’16’ Ndesigned by Kevin Kroen Landscape Architect American Society of Landscape Architects Rubin Residence 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Revisions Rear Yard - Landscape Plan May 2021 No.Date No.DateThis plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of biota LLC. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval from biota LLC. 3420 48th Ave N. Minneapolis, MN 55429 studio 612.781.4000 / www.biotalandscapes.com DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6601 Biscayne Blvd - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a proposed survey , site plan, and roof plan dated May and June 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The request is for a variance to lot coverage and rear yard setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to Biscayne Blvd, Londonderry Rd, and private property. Proposed site grading will maintain existing flow paths. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater precautions are not required for this work, as the proposed net impervious surface decreases. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control Perimeter control will be required during the project. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Public Utilities No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. Watermain installed and structure built in 1973. A well is likely not located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required . 6601 Biscayne Blvd Rear Yard setback and lot coverage variance EdinaMN.gov 2 EdinaMN.gov 3 Site plan submitted for permit 4/21 EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 Proposed survey EdinaMN.gov 6 EdinaMN.gov 7 Proposed Existing EdinaMN.gov 8 EdinaMN.gov 9 EdinaMN.gov 10 EdinaMN.gov 11 EdinaMN.gov 12 6601 Biscayne Blvd SUPPORTED BY James & Mary Vandervelde SUPPORTED BY Les & Nancy Jones Support from Existing Neighbors 8858798808828838848848788778768868868878668858798808828838848848788778768868868878668 7 7 ' -0 "878' -0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N N PATIO REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 380 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,038.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 26.5% PROPOSED OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 380 S.F. CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 06/04/2021 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Existing Proposed 885879880882883884884878877876886886887866885879880882883884884878877876886886887866N SHED REMOVED LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 (SHED REMOVED) (PATIO REMOVED) COVERED DECK/PORCH 236.75 OPEN DECK 150 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 3,962.75 LOT AREA 15,251.3 25% WITHIN EDINA LIMITS OPEN DECK 150 S.F. COVERED DECK 236.75 S.F.PATIO REMOVED877' -0"878' - 0" 8 7 9 ' -0 "875' -0"EXISTING HOME 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 EXISTING DECK 338.4 S.F. EXISTING PATIO 603 S.F. LOT AREA 15,251.3 EXIS. SHED 82.5 S.F. EXISTING HOUSE 3,576.0 EXISTING SHED 82.5 EXISTING PATIO 603.0 EXISTING DECK 338.4 (ALLOWANCE 150.0) LOT COVERAGE 4,449.5 LOT AREA 15,251.3 29.2% EXISTING EXISTING WALKWAY EXISTING DRIVEWAY EXISTING HOUSE 3,576 S.F. N CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS1/8" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 07/13/2021 EXISTING AND POSSIBLE SITE PLANS SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE :1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING SITE PLAN Without a variance... DN A KITCHENDININGOFFICEHALL DECK COVERED DECK SHED BELOW JOTUL GF 370 STOVE (BLACK)w/ BLACK REFLECTIVE PANEL. REMOTE CONTROLLED. STOVE PIPE TO RUN STRAIGHT. STEEL POST, TYP. SEE STRUCTURAL 2x10 CEDAR MULLIONS, PTD 2X4 FLANKING CEDAR MULLIONS TO ACCEPT SCREEN PANELS, PTD DOWNSPOUT DOWNSPOUT THROUGH DECK STAIR: 17R @ 6 1/2", 16T @ 12" FASCIA TO BEAM CONNECTION 887' - 1 3/16" 887' - 0" IN-FLOOR WATERPROOF RECEPTACLE BOXES, TYP. PLACE IN JOIST SPACE. 7 THUS A 2 .11A 2 .13 A 2 .14 A 2 .12 2 3 1 B B D D C 4 EXISTING EXTERIOR FINISH C E N T E R O F C O L U M N S C E N T E R O F C O L U M N SCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSCENTER OF COLUMNSwww wUPLIGHT BK LIGHTING 'DELTA STAR', WIDE BEAM HAIKU FAN w/ LIGHT HAIKU FAN w LIGHT RED DOT GROMMET FLOOR OUTLET TH AIR VENT THERMOSTAT 2 A6.1 6 A6.1 5 A6.1 D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N D E C K IN G D IR E C T IO N N O V IS IB L E S E A M S N O V IS IB L E S E A M SwTH LEGEND REPLACE EXISTING CANTILEVER DECKING AND RAILING TO MATCH NEW DECK. BAMDECK 4G COFFEE N OPEN CORNERS: NO CABLE RAILING AT EXTERIOR CORNERS F L U S H EQ. EEQ. EEQ. EEQ. E3' - 7 5/8"GLASS HEAT SHIELD BY OWNER @ BACK OF STOVE EDGE OF DECKING 6 3/8" GRID TO CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2021 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITIONPERMIT SETChristopher A. Strom Architect Name Signature Registration No. I hereby certify that these drawings and specifications were prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Date 45125 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1.2 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 02/15/19 SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN No.Description Date 1 Stove Location 3/22/2021 2 Bid Addendum 1 3/24/2021 grill eat sit 06.04.2021 C1i Rendering Image RUBIN SCREEN PORCH: EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE TRANSPARENCY STAIR FOOTINGS SHOWN ON S1.2 & A1.1 CHRISTOPHERARCHITECTSSTROMchristopherstrom.com3308 Gorham AvenueSt. Louis Park MN 55426612 . 961 . 9093Copyright 2020 STROM ARCHITECTS LTD. ADDITION & REMODELPERMIT SET6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55436 REVISIONS: RUBIN SCREEN PORCH S1.1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLANS SCALE :1/4" = 1'-0"1 FOOTING/ FOUNDATION PLAN No.Description Date 5 POSTS Scale: 1” = 8’ 0’4’8’16’ Ndesigned by Kevin Kroen Landscape Architect American Society of Landscape Architects Rubin Residence 6601 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 Revisions Rear Yard - Landscape Plan May 2021 No.Date No.DateThis plan and the concepts represented herein are the property of biota LLC. Use of this plan shall require prior written approval from biota LLC. 3420 48th Ave N. Minneapolis, MN 55429 studio 612.781.4000 / www.biotalandscapes.com RAIN GARDEN DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6601 Biscayne Blvd - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a proposed survey , site plan, and roof plan dated May and June 2021. Summary of Work The applicant proposes removing an existing deck and patio and replacing them with a screened porch and smaller deck. The request is for a variance to lot coverage and rear yard setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to Biscayne Blvd, Londonderry Rd, and private property. Proposed site grading will maintain existing flow paths. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater precautions are not required for this work, as the proposed net impervious surface decreases. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control Perimeter control will be required during the project. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Public Utilities No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required , applicant will need to verify with the district. Watermain installed and structure built in 1973. A well is likely not located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required . ~877 - 6877877 883 882 881 880 879 878 YARD 6601 BISCAYNE BLVD. 6600 PARKWOOD LANE DENSE ROW OF CEDAR TREES PROPERTY LINECHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS3/16" = 1'-0" RUBIN SCREEN PORCH 07/02/2021 TREE SCREENING BETWEEN PROPERTIES REAR NEIGHBOR RUBIN'S MAIN LEVEL FIN FL @ 887.1 100' -0" BASEMENT FIN FL 90' -9" GRADE AT ENTRY 882 883 884 885 886 ~877 -6 GARAGE BEYONDMAIN LIVING LEVEL GRADE AT EAST OF HOUSE 879 880 881 882 883883 882 881 880 879 878 BASEMENT w/ SOUTH WALKOUT DRIVEWAY BEYOND YARD 881 NORTH to BISCAYNE BLVD. PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATION CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS 6/3/2021 4:02:22 PMRUBIN SCREEN PORCH A1ii SECTION DIAGRAM GRADE CHANGE 3/16" = 1'-0" 06/04/2021 NINE FOOT DROP Randy Anhorn, District Administrator 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 952-835-2078 ranhorn@ninemilecreek.org www.ninemilecreek.org When is a Permit required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District? A permit is required from the District when one or more of the following conditions are met: Rule 2.0 - Floodplain and Drainage Alterations □ Any alteration or filling of land and/or redirection of flow below the District’s 100-year floodplain. Rule 3.0 – Wetlands Management □ Any activity that results in the draining, excavation, or filling of a wetland regulated through the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), where the District is the WCA local government unit (LGU) (the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, and Richfield). □ Projects requiring any District permits are required to meet the wetland buffer and stormwater- treatment provisions of this rule, unless determined exempt through WCA. Rule 4.0 - Stormwater Management □ Land-disturbing activities that disturb more than 50 cubic yards of material or 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation and: o Redevelopment of Single Family Home Properties: Redevelopment on a single-family home property subject to this rule as follows: ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by less than 25 percent, no demonstration of compliance with the criteria is required. ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by 25 percent or more and will disturb less than 50 percent of the existing impervious surface on the site, the stormwater criteria will apply to the area of increased impervious surface. ✓ If the proposed activity will increase total impervious surface by 25 percent or more and will disturb 50 percent or more of the existing impervious surface on the site, the stormwater criteria will apply to the entire site. o All Other Construction Activities: ✓ New development on a single-family home property ✓ Linear projects creating more than 1 acre of new or additional impervious surface ✓ Redevelopment: ▪ Activities that disturb more than 50% of the existing impervious surface on the parcel or will increase the imperviousness of the entire parcel by more than 50%, will need to meet the rule criteria for the entire project parcel. Otherwise, the rule will only apply to the disturbed areas and additional impervious surface on the project parcel. Rule 5.0 – Erosion and Sediment Control □ The excavation of 50 cubic yards or more of earth, or alteration or removal of 5,000 square feet or more of surface area or vegetation. Rule 6.0- Watercourse and Basin Crossing □ Any construction, improvement, repair or removal of a crossing or structure in contact with or under the bed or bank of any waterbody. Rule 7.0 – Shoreline and Streambank Improvements □ Any installation of a shoreline or streambank improvement, including but not limited to riprap, a bioengineered installation or a retaining wall, on a public water. Rule 8.0 – Sediment Removal □ Any removal of sediment from the beds, banks or shores of any public water. Rule 9.0 – Appropriation of Public Surface Waters □ The appropriation from a public water basin, public wetland or a protected watercourse. NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 14:06:29 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jim and Mary Vandervelde Q2.Address 6605 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment We are fully supportive of the Rubins' porch and deck project. We've fully reviewed the plans and we are comfortable that it will be a welcome addition to the neighborhood and won't cause any issues. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm Last Seen:Jul 06, 2021 18:19:38 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Esther Connor Q2.Address 6600 Biscayne Blvd Q3.Comment Russ and Karen are excellent neighbors who take meticulous care of their property. We have seen their plans and this would enhance their property and our neighborhood. We fully support them in their request to proceed with their porch. Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm Last Seen:Jul 07, 2021 16:34:12 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Leslie ( Les) Jones Q2.Address 6600 Parkwood Ln Q3.Comment I live directly behind the Rubin's. I have live there for about 20 years. The Rubin's were living in their house when we moved in. At the fence line between our two properties the Rubin's have a tall evergreen trees that offer a lot of privacy between the two properties. I have looked at their proposal to add a porch off the main level and a ground level deck. I think that these additions to their house would be great for the Rubin's without affecting my property in any way. When we moved in we added a four season porch and deck off of our main level which has added a lot of enjoyment to my family over the years. I support their proposal for a variance. They are reducing the building coverage ratio and the 9 ft variance for the rear yard set back will not change anything for the Joneses. The way it looks is that the porch is encroaching the rear set back, not the open decks so noise would not be any more of an issue. I look forward to see the addition built for the Rubin's. I'm sure their family will enjoy the new space just like Nancy and I have enjoyed our porch and deck. Nancy and Les Jones Date: July 14, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.C . To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:Emily Bo d eker, Assistant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-21-21, 2.1 fo o t s id e yard setbac k variance at 5615 S herwood Drive Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : S taff cannot support a side yard setback variance for a structure that can be designed or placed on the lot so that it meets the 10-foot setback requirement. S taff does not believe there are unique circumstances to the subject property. I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he subject property, 5615 S herwood Avenue is located on the east side of S herwood Avenue, north of S outhview Lane and south of Wind R oad. T he existing home was built in 1948, and a second floor associated with a larger remodel was added in 2012. T he existing house conforms to the required 10-foot side yard setback on the north side. T he request is for a 2.1-foot side yard setback variance to allow for the construction of an addition on the north side of the existing house that is 7.9 feet to the property line. A variance is required given the proposed addition does not meet the required 10-foot side yard setback. With exception of the side yard setback, the proposed project meets all other zoning requirements. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Staff Report Applicant Submittal Site Location Map Engineering Memo Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Pres entation The subject property, 5615 Sherwood Avenue is located on the east side of Sherwood Avenue, north of Southview Lane and south of Wind Road. The existing home was built in 1948, and a second floor associated with a larger remodel was added in 2012. The existing house conforms to the required 10-foot side yard setback on the north side. The request is for a 2.1-foot side yard setback variance to allow for the construction of an addition on the north side of the existing house that is 7.9 feet to the property line. A variance is required given the proposed addition does not meet the required 10-foot side yard setback. With exception of the side yard setback, the proposed project meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The subject property, 5615 Sherwood Avenue was built in 1948 with a second story added in 2012. The current home meets the required 10-foot side yard setback to the north property line but does not meet the required 10-foot side yard setback to the south property line. July 14, 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-21-21, a 2.1-foot side yard setback variance for an addition at 5615 Sherwood Avenue Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and submitted with comments as attached in their July 7, 2021, memorandum. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Side yard West Side – Front Yard South Side – Side Yard East Side – Rear Yard 10 feet 36.2 feet 10 feet 25 feet 7.9 feet* ~33.1 feet (existing) 8 feet (existing) >50 feet Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf 25% 24.99% *Requires a variance STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issue Is the proposed variance justified? No. Staff does not believe the variance criteria is met in this instance. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. Staff questions if the proposal is reasonable. The existing structure meets the required setback to the north property line. The size of the proposed addition could be reduced to meet the required 10-foot setback, or the proposed addition could be placed on the site to meet the required setbacks. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The required 10-foot setback is the same for all lots greater than 75 feet in width zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The placement and design of the proposed porch is created by the applicant. The structure could be reduced in size or placed on the lot so that it meets the required setbacks on the subject property. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? While the proposed addition would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood, approving the side yard setback variance may set a precedent that could affect the surrounding properties. Staff Recommendation Staff cannot support a side yard setback variance for a structure that can be designed or placed on the lot so that it meets the 10-foot setback requirement. Staff does not believe there are unique circumstances to the subject property. Staff’s recommendation for denial of the requested side yard setback variance is based on the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 4 1. If the variance were denied, reasonable use of the property would not be denied. A conforming addition could be designed and constructed on the subject property. 2. There are not circumstances that are unique to the subject property. Placement and design of the addition was created by the applicant. 3. The proposed variance may not alter the character of the neighborhood, however, approving the variance may set a precedent that could affect surrounding properties with similar lot sizes and configurations. If the Planning Commission believes that the proposal is reasonable and that the application meets the conditions to grant a variance, the Commission could approve the variance based on the following findings: 1. The criteria for granting a variance is met. 2. The proposed addition is reasonable. The size and layout of the proposed addition is needed for a serviceable floorplan. 3. There is adequate separation from the proposed addition to the existing house to the north of the subject property. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey and plans date stamped, June 10, 2021. 2. Comments and conditions listed in the July 7, 2021, Engineering Memo. SHEET L AYOUT ORIGINATION DATE 03/11/2021 REVISION DATE 03/24/2021 As-Built Kershner SHEET NO.www.sicora.com Lic. #BC253425 TEAM:5601 West Lake StreetSt. Louis Park, MN 55416Telephone: 952.929.0098Fax: 952.285.5580I.D.: DARCY JILL CHENELLE LC: JIM CHRIS CIRO BRAD TIMDRAFTER: JAY CHENELLE JILL DARCYSALES: RON MARK CLIENT:AddressKershnerMatt & Margaret5615 Sherwood Ave. Edina, MNT1..TITLE/SITE PLAN/ROOF PLAN A1...PROP. LOWER FLOOR A2...PROP. 1st FLOOR A3...PROP. 2nd FLOOR A4...PROP. NORTH/SOUTH ELEV. A5...PROP. EAST/WEST ELEV. A6...PROP. BUILDING SECTIONS A7...PROP. DETAILS A8...PROP. INTERIOR ELEV. A9...EXIST. FLOOR PLANS/ELEV.& EXIST. ELECTRICAL PLAN E1...ELEC. LOWER FLOOR PLAN E2...ELEC. 1st. FLOOR PLAN E3...ELEC. 2nd. FLOOR PLAN S1...STRUCT. LOWER FLR. PLAN S2...STRUCT. 1st. FLOOR PLAN S3...STRUCT. 2nd. FLOOR PLAN Reviewed by: Client:____________ Date:_____________ ALL PLANS & DESIGNS SHOWN ARE THE PROPERTY OF SICORA DESIGN / BUILD USE OF THESE PLANS ON ANY OTHER PROJECT/LOT OTHER THAN NOTED ON THIS TITLE BLOCK WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF SICORA DESIGN / BUILD IS PROHIBITED. © COPYRIGHT 2021 T1..TITLE/SITE PLAN/ROOF PLAN A1...PROP. LOWER FLOOR A2...PROP. 1st FLOOR A3...PROP. 2nd FLOOR A4...PROP. NORTH/SOUTH ELEV. A5...PROP. EAST/WEST ELEV. A6...PROP. SECTIONS A9...EXIST. LOWER FLOOR A10..EXIST. 1st FLOOR A11..EXIST. 2nd FLOOR A12..EXIST. ELEVATIONS A13..EXIST. ELEVATIONS E1...ELEC. LOWER FLOOR E2...ELEC. 1st FLOOR 06/09/2021 Bid Set Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, Henn epin County, Edin a, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 5615 Sh erwood Ave July 2, 2021 1 in = 50 f t / DATE: 7/7/2021 TO: Cary Teagu e – Plan ning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5615 Sherwood Ave - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and u tility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the req uest of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included site plan and erosion control plan dated 5/20/21. Summary of Work The applicant proposes a 1 st story addition (240 SF). The request is for a variance to side yard setback. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to private property and Sherwood Ave. Proposed grading was not shown on the site plan. Proposed grading shall be provided for permit review and ensure no new concentrated flows are directed to the adjacent window wells or nearby structures. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater mitigation is not required for this addition. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is generally consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP -002. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Public Utilities No comment. Miscellaneous Any modifications to an existing sump system or a new sump system, particularly the discharge point requires City review. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is not required per correspondence with the Watershed District. Structure built 1948. Watermain as-built dated 1947. A well is not likely located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required . Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 14 July 2021 Public Hearing Comments-5615 Sherwood Ave Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 2.1-foot side yard setback variance at 5615 Sherwood Avenue VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 2 RESPONSES 2 1 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 1 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jul 14, 2021 06:45:11 am Last Seen:Jul 14, 2021 06:45:11 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Beth and Tim Kehoe Q2.Address 5613 Sherwood Ave Q3.Comment Hello, We are the neighbors to the north of 5615 Sherwood Ave, Edina, MN 55424. After reviewing the drawings sent by the city and talking to the Kershners, we would love to lend our support to their project and their request for a 2.1 foot side yard setback variance. It looks like they have taken great care when planning with their architect to ensure the addition fits with the rest of their house and is respectful of our privacy. The requested set back would be totally fine with us. Please consider their request knowing they have the full support of the neighbors closest to the addition. Respondent No:2 Login:Liz Olson Email:lkolson@EdinaMN.gov Responded At:Jul 14, 2021 12:24:09 pm Last Seen:Jul 15, 2021 14:20:26 pm IP Address:156.142.185.16 Q1.First and Last Name Matt Lovaas Q2.Address 5610 Sherwood Ave Q3.Comment I am a neighbor and reside at 5610 Sherwood Ave. I vote to allow this request. If you need anything further from me regarding this matter, please let me know. The CITY of EDINA B-21-21 5615 Sherwood Avenue Side Yard Setback Variance The CITY of EDINA 5615 Sherwood Ave www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA B-21-21 5615 Sherwood Avenue Side Yard Setback Variance The CITY of EDINA 5615 Sherwood Ave www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Date: July 14, 2021 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:P lanning C o mmis s io n Item Type: R eport and R ec o mmendation F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r Item Activity: Subject:Zoning O rd inance Amend ment, R evis ed O verall Develo p ment P lan, S ite P lan R eview– 4911 77th S treet Wes t Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED : R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N : T he P lanning C ommission is asked to consider a proposal for a Z oning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the P entagon P ark S outh (P U D -17) known as P entagon Village, which was approved in 2019. T he applicants, J ay S cott, S olomon Real E state and R ise D evelopment, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. AT TAC HME N T S : Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report 7-8-21 Noon Staff Report Memo - Affordable Hous ing Development Manager Memo - Building & Fire Memo - Engineering Sus tainability Ques tionnaire Applicant Narrative Propos ed Plans Building renderings Traffic and Parking Study Previous ly Approved Site Plan Approved Overall Development Plan Exis ting PUD Zoning for the Site Sketch Plans Draft Ordinance Amendment Staff Pres entation Applicant Pres entation Survey Responses 30 January 2019 - 07 July 2021 Public Hearing Comments- Pentagon South Apartments Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District - 17 to change the use on Lot 3 of Pentagon Village from a 153-room extended stay hotel to a 200-unit apartment at 4911 77th St W. No Responses VISITORS 1 CONTRIBUTORS 0 RESPONSES 0 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous The Planning Commission is asked to consider a proposal for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise the previously approved plans for the Pentagon Park South (PUD-17) known as Pentagon Village, which was approved in 2019. The applicants, Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate and Rise Development, are proposing to develop the vacant lot in the southeast corner of the development, with a 6-story, 200-unit apartment. Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing. The overall development site in PUD-17 is 12.5 acres. The uses approved for the PUD include retail space, a 235-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp in phase one; phase two included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp (expansion) and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. (See approved Overall PUD-17 Plans.) The approved plans for the specific site we are looking at called for the development of the 5-story 153 room hotel. The proposal is to amend the Overall Development Plan to replace the hotel with a 200-unit apartment. The request requires the following: 1. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. The PUD Zoning is used to ensure affordable housing on the site. July 14, 2021 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Revised Overall Development Plan, Site Plan Review– 4911 77th Street West Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 The applicant has noted the following revisions based on the feedback during sketch plan review in their narrative: The building façade has been specifically designed with consideration of articulation and placement of materials. Natural materials have been incorporated into the design especially at key points of pedestrian engagement in an effort to create a building that is timeless and transformative for the area. The designers have thoughtfully considered the pedestrian experience and have emphasized connections, both within the property to the existing Pentagon Village Plaza and further to the Fred Richards Park and the 9 Mile Creek trail located north of the site. The Site Plan and Landscape Plan include of a variety of site amenities to enhance the pedestrian experience including benches, planters, bike racks, and variation in ground surface material. Public art punctuates the pedestrian pathways at key locations. The northern edge of the building and site has been carefully considered as both a vehicular and pedestrian entry experience into the Pentagon Village. The main entry to the building is placed at the northwest corner to draw guests into the site and reflect some of the energy generated from the central plaza. The northeast corner is activated with a lounge/flex-space that opens out to an outdoor patio. This seating area will provide an active and lively entry experience to Pentagon Village from Computer Avenue. Ease of flow throughout the Village has always been a goal. There is both pedestrian and bike connections on the west side of the building, creating an inviting experience for pedestrians entering the Pentagon Village from Viking Drive. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Multi-family residential and retail; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District and guided OR, Office Residential. Easterly: Office/light industrial uses; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided OR, Office Residential. Southerly: City of Bloomington. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The subject site within the PUD is vacant and relatively flat. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Planning Guide Plan designation: Office/Residential (20-75 residential units per acre) Zoning: PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District-17 Parking Based on the proposal for 200 units of apartments, 400 parking stalls would be required under current City Code; however, under the draft ordinance recommended by the Planning Commission, 250 parking stalls would be provided. The proposed plan calls for 152 enclosed parking stalls, 5 surface stalls and 93 stalls within the existing parking ramp for a total of 250 stalls, which would comply with the proposed Ordinance. The previously proposed hotel only provided 5 parking stalls, and 148 stalls within the adjacent ramp to meet the parking requirements. The proposal would require less reliance on the adjacent parking ramp, which would allow more use by future projects within Pentagon Village, including availability of public parking. Wenck Associates Consulting conducted a parking study and concluded that the proposed parking would be adequate to serve the proposed residential project as long as the parking spaces within the parking ramp are utilized. (See attached parking study and addendum.) Site Circulation/Traffic The proposal would not change the circulation of the overall development plan for Pentagon Village. Vehicle access would be the interior roadway. Access to the on-site enclosed parking would be on the west side of the building. There would be sidewalks provided on all four sides of the building, including a north/south pedestrian/bikeway on the west side of the building. Exterior bike racks are proposed on both the west and east sides of the building. And interior bike storage is proposed in the enclosed parking garage. Wenck Associated conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project, and no roadway improvements are necessary. Recommendations have been made regarding Travel Demand Management strategies. (See attached traffic study.) Landscaping The landscape plan is generally consistent with the previously approved landscape plan for the site. (See the approved overall development plan.) There would be overstory trees planted along Computer Drive and Viking Drive. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached engineering memo. (See attached memo dated July 9, 2021.) A site improvement plan agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination brick veneer with architectural metal panels (See attached renderings and building materials.) Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Compliance Table PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet NA 21 feet NA 12 feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district 6 stories and 68 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% 1.5% STAFF REPORT Page 5 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the revised PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff supports the revised site and revised use for this site for the following reasons: 1. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. (See the attached PUD-17 Ordinance) Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 2. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 3. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. 4. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. • Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. STAFF REPORT Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Recommend the City Council approve the request for an Ordinance Amendment, revised Overall Development Plan and revised final site plan approval to amend the existing PUD for the site. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The project is consistent with the following goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan: • Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. • Seek opportunities to increase the supply of affordable housing, as well as to preserve the affordability of existing affordable housing. • Facilitate the development of new housing that accommodates the needs of a people of diverse needs and from diverse backgrounds. • A pedestrian-friendly environment. • Support continued livability and high quality of life for all city residents by balancing goals and priorities for development, especially as the community responds to changes over time. • Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area. • Encourage infill and redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of city infrastructure, complement community context and character, and respond to needs at all stages of life. • Primary uses in the OR, Office Residential category, which this site is located within are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box" retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. 3. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 4. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 5. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. STAFF REPORT Page 7 Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans date stamped June 16, 2021. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo and transportation planner dated July 9, 2021. 8. Compliance with the Wenck Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 9. Subject to City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment revising the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated July 2, 2021. 11. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings listed above. Deadline for a city decision: October 5, 2021 TO: Cary Teague FROM: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager DATE: July 2, 2021 RE: Pentagon Village Apartments Based on the application narrative, the proposed Pentagon Village Apartments will be complying with the Policy for New Multifamily Housing by providing 10% of the units to households with incomes at 50% of Area Median Income. This equates to 20 units of affordable housing. Although fewer in number than if the developer were providing 20% of units to tenants with incomes at 60% of AMI, the 50% units are needed in the City. 2040 Comprehensive Plan Goals Forecasted Need Proposed % Remaining Total Units 1804 354 19.6% 1450 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9% 729 31-50% AMI 480 153 31.9% 327 51-80% AMI 573 179 31.2% 394 Of the developments that have been reviewed, approved or completed since the crafting of the 2040 Comprehensive plan, 354 are affordable. I cannot speak to the unit mix or the market rate comparisons. July 2, 2021 Cary Teague, Community Development Director David Fisher, Chief Building Official Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Pentagon Village South Lot 3 New 200-unit five story Apartment Building Information / Background: New five-story apartment building with 200-units. - This would be an R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code. - Provide a complete Build Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. - NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required and NFPA 72 Fire Alarm System is required. - Emergency Responder 800 MHZ Radio Coverage Permit Required. - Verify Address. - Verify fire hydrant location within 100ft of FDC near main entrance. - Verify Fire Department access. - Verify that balconies on this apartment building have enough room to install any kind of grill and meet the Fire Department requirements. - Verify there is adequate assessable parking. - Verify noise ordinance is complying and understood. Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed - Recommend a meeting with staff for 30, 60 and 90 percent before submitting for building permit. DATE: 7/9/2021 TO: 4911 77th St W, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE, Graduate Engineer Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner RE: 4911 77th St W – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included civil, landscape, and survey drawings dated 6/16/21. Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 1a. The proposal to vacate and relocate the existing hydrant and associated easement will have to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department. New recorded easement, if approved, is required at permit closeout. Grading/Building Permit 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure (if there are changes to existing) and grading post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. General Comment Survey 4. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 4.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 7. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with a 5’ boulevard or 6’ in width without a boulevard. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 8. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Grading/Building Permit 9. Commercial driveway entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Entrance shall conform to standard plate 415. Building Permit 10. Viking Drive is scheduled to be milled and overlaid in 2022. Computer Ave was milled and overlaid in 2019. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540 and 541. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 11. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 12. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 13. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 14. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works, as needed. Prior to Starting Utility Work 14.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 14.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 15. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main, if any. 16. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 17. A sealed well is located onsite. No issue. General comment Storm Water Utility 18. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 19. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements.  Report should reference prior master development stormwater management plan and describe how this site changes and modifies the prior assumptions for stormwater. Grading/Building Permit 20. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 21. Lowest opening required at no less than 824.4’. Grading/Building Permit 22. Provide net cut/fill calculations to ensure no net fill below 822.4’. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 23. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 24. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 25. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 26a. Proof of MPCA permit closure required. Certificate of Occupancy 26. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Sustainability 27. The Metropolitan Council's Extreme Heat map shows that during an extreme heat event (when air temperatures are 90 or above), this area of Edina can be 4-9 degrees F hotter than surrounding areas. Green roofs reduce the urban heat island effect, reducing amount of greenhouse gas emissions trapped in the atmosphere and energy needs to cool a building. Staff recommends increasing the amount of green roof or garden to reduce this urban heat island effect and energy costs to cool the building. General Comment 28. The University of Minnesota's Solar Suitability map rates this site as "good" for solar roof installations with a grade of 83 out of 100. Staff recommends considering rooftop solar panels to maximize benefits of renewable energy. General Comment 29. The City of Edina has a goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 and 45% by 2030. To help the City achieve this goal, staff recommends this site consider accessing renewable energy for at least 30% of the building’s total energy needs. Accessing renewable energy could be installing a solar array on site, purchasing renewable energy credits, or subscribing to renewable energy offsite. General Comment 30. Staff recommends installing EV chargers for a minimum of 5% (7 stalls) of proposed parking in addition to wiring 10% (14 stalls) for EV conversion in the future. General Comment 31. Staff recommends site consider applying for EV carshare infrastructure support via HourCar’s multi-family building grant program found here. General Comment 32. Staff understands from the Sustainable Design Questionnaire submitted on July 6, 2021 that the development team commits to the following:  Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance program  Install Energy Star appliances  Include partial green roof at amenity deck  Provide shade trees beyond those required by code  Include native plantings in landscaping  Include pollinator-friendly plantings in landscaping  Train future owners and managers in methods to avoid harmful chemicals used on landscaping  Recycling and separate scrap or excess construction materials  Provide separate recycling dumpsters and training for workers  Provide recycling services to tenants  Provide space for organics recycling in the future  Install low-flow fixtures  Include a water sensor for outdoor landscape watering system  Include bike parking for guests and residents  Provide EV charging for residents General Comment 33. Site plan shows bike storage within the underground parking. Staff recommends providing a minimum of one bike parking stall for every 10 residential units (20) and one surface bike parking stall for every 20 residential units (10). These parking stalls should be in convenient, well-lit locations within 50’ of a public entrance to the building. Rack style and spacing should follow the recommendations of the Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals (APBP). General Comment 34. Staff recommends implementing four (min.) suggested additional Travel Demand Management strategies:  Provide surface bike parking (10 stalls min.);  Provide a bike repair station on-site, located adjacent to surface or underground bike parking;  Construct perimeter and internal sidewalks 8’ wide or more to safely accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists;  Provide directional signage/information for adjacent pedestrians, bicycle and transit facilities and ride-sharing services;  Subsidize Metro Transit passes for tenants/employees. General Comment City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 1 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire The City of Edina has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the community. To help achieve these goals, developers seeking City approval must complete this form as part of their zoning application. Upon receipt of this form, please email Sustainability Coordinator, Grace Hancock, GHancock@edinamn.gov, to set up a time to walk through the form and discuss sustainable building strategies. Please email the completed form to Cary Teague, CTeague@edinamn.gov, and copy Grace Hancock. Topics Answers Yes or No Brief Description Sustainable Design & Energy Consumption Will you utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? Yes Started Xcel EDA process. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals? No Meet 2020 MN Energy Code Will the building be LEED certified? No Will all appliances and equipment be Energy Star or EPA WaterSense certified? Yes Energy Star Appliances Will different strategies to conserve energy (beyond those required by code) be included? If so, please describe Yes Evaluating mechanical systems and envelope for potential efficiencies Will there be renewable energy such as solar or wind be generated on site? No Will the project include a geothermal system? No Will the completed project subscribe to a community solar program or other renewable energy program? No Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? No Potential for purchasing RECs if required Comments: Managing Storm Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 100%, <50% Site design in process What new surfaces will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) Planting beds, landscape lawns & boulevards Will a green roof be included on the new structure to assist in storm water retention? Yes Partial green roof at amenity deck Will rain gardens or similar features be included on site to filter and retain the storm water? No Existing underground stormwater system Comments: Landscaping Features to Manage Air Quality and Heat Island Effect Will existing healthy trees be protected and saved? N/A There are no existing trees on site. City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 2 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 0%, estimated 5-10% Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? No No existing trees on site Will shade trees be provided along roadways, drives and surface parking areas beyond those required by code? Yes Will native plantings be used in the landscaping? Yes Will landscaping include pollinator-friendly varieties? Yes Will future owners and managers be trained in methods to avoid harmful chemicals being used on landscaping? Yes Comments: Managing Construction Waste Will demolition of existing structures meet LEED Green Building Demolition and/or B3 State of Minnesota Sustainable Building Guidelines? N/A No existing structures Will existing building elements be salvaged for reuse? Example, timber, steel, asphalt, cabinets, etc. N/A Are scrap and excess construction materials being separated and recycled? Yes Are workers provided with separate recycling dumpsters and training in proper use? Yes Comments: Managing Operational Waste Will a recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To any businesses on site? Yes Recycling will be provided for residents Will an organic recycling service be provided to those in the multifamily complex? To all businesses on site? No Space will be allocated for organic recycling in the future Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding proper recycling practices? Yes Comments: Managing Water Consumption Is the project including features to reduce water consumption beyond features required by code? Yes Units will feature low-flow fixtures Is there a grey water system included to reuse water on site? Will future users of the building be provided with education and training regarding conservation of water? No City of Edina – New Construction Sustainability Questionnaire Page 3 City of Edina Sustainable Construction Questionnaire Will outdoor landscaping watering system include a water sensor to automatically reduce watering in wet conditions? Yes Comments: Sustainable Transportation Features Is the site accessible by public transit within ½ mile? Yes Are site features included to make the use of public transit convenient and simple? Examples include sheltered waiting areas, paved sidewalks and clear site lines. Yes Lobby and bike parking connected to sidewalks and paths If there is no public transit within ½ mile, is the project providing features to help bridge the distance to allow flexibility to use public transit? N/A Is bike Parking available near the main entrance for guests? Space in parking structure (e.g. bike corral, bike lockers) for residents’ bikes? Yes Secure bike parking will be provided for residents, bike parking will also be provided for guests. Is bike parking and a shower facility provided for employees? No Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners, guests or customers to use? Yes EV charging provided for residents Will there be parking spaces provided for car- sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? No Updated January 2021 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative For the Pentagon Village Apartments on Lot 3 Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application for Lot 3 This Zoning Ordinance Amendment application seeks to amend the existing Pentagon Village PUD to change the use on Lot 3 from the previously approved 153 -room extended stay hotel to an approximate 200-unit multi-family housing community. Multi -Family Housing Project Description The proposed building will include approximately 200 for-rent apartment units in five levels. The building will also include one level of covered on-grade parking. Additional parking will be available in a small surface lot and within the existing parking structure on the adjacent lot. Continuing with the approach of crafted views into the site and having all building front doors have a connection to Pentagon Village as a whole, this building has been positioned on the site to create a welcoming and connected entry experience for guests and residents alike. At the second level, the U-shaped building wraps a courtyard amenity deck which opens to the south, having the potential to further activate and enhance the street edge along Viking Drive. Th is building will become an integral part of Pentagon Village and help to balance the development, activating the site with permanent residents 24 hours a day. The residents will enjoy the convenient access to the surrounding amenities , eas e of access to various types of transportation, and the welcoming open and green spaces throughout Pentagon Village. Commitment to Sustainable Development The design of this residential building will fulfill a commitment and holistic approach to sustainable design taking into consideration energy use, water use, place making, ecology, materials, circularity of prod uc ts (supply chain), as well as equity and justice for both the residents and the neighborhood. This building will be constructed with Modular units by RISE modular. Modular construction is inherently sustainable for a variety of reasons including but not limited to a substantial reduction in construction waste, less disturbance of the site during construction, decrease in energy consumption during constru ction, and overall emissions decrease by minimizing construction deliveries to the site. The site will be thoughtfully considered in terms of sustainable landscaping (drought tolerant and low water use), permeable surfaces, water treatment, and connection and promotion of alternative transportation. The building construction will include multiple energy and water savings measures throughout. Ultimately, the effort that will be put towards great design and the use of quality construction methods will facilitate the construction of a landmark building at the edge of the Pentagon Village development . These measures will ensure the longevity of the use of this building , making it ultimately sustainable. City of Edina Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 2 Commitment to Affordable Housing We recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live and work in the City of Edina. The Pentagon Village Apartments will provide a minimum of 10% of its residential units at 50% of the average market income (AMI). The development team and ownership of the Pentagon Village Apartments will provide this affordable housing component at no cost to the city or public. Compatibility with Pentagon Village PUD Zoning The current PUD zoning for Pentagon Village was established to provide more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The current Pentagon Village PUD allows for a mix of uses including retail, office, hospitalit y and multi-family housing. The proposed zoning ordinance amendment to the Pentagon Village PUD meets the intent of the PUD by including the following: • The proposed multi-family housing project maintains a development pattern and use that is consistent with the existing Pentagon Village PUD. • The proposed multi-family housing project incorporates design elements that are consistent within Pentagon Village and include: sustainable design, new technologies in building design and construction, special constructio n materials, enhanced landscaping and lighting, and a pedestrian-oriented design that establishes appropriate transitions and connections between the differing land uses. • The proposed multi-family housing project provides an exceptionally high quality of d esign that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding land uses , including both existing and proposed. Response to Sketch Plan Review Comments To address the comments and suggestions received during the Sketch Plan presentation to the Planning Commission and City Council, the Design Team has implemented the following items in the current Site and Building Design : • The building façade has been specifically designed with consideration of articulation and placement of materials. Natural materials have been incorporated into the design especially at key points of pedestrian engagement in an effort to create a building that is timeless and transformative for the area. City of Edina Zoning Ordinance Amendment Application Narrative Pentagon Village – Lot 3 Page 3 • The d esigners have thoughtfully considered the pedestrian experience and have emphasized connections , both within the property to the existing Pentagon Village Plaza and further to the Fred Richards Park and the 9 Mile Creek trail located north of the site. • The Site Plan and Landscape Plan include of a variety of site ameni ties to enhance the pedestrian experience including benches, planters, bike racks, and variation in ground surface material. Public art punctuates the pedestrian pathways at key locations . • The northern edge of the building and site has been carefully considered as both a vehicular and pedestrian entry experience into the Pentagon Village . The main entry to the building is placed at the northwest corner to draw guests into the site and reflect some of the energy generated from the cent ral plaza. • In order to enhance the public realm on a 24 hour basis , studies of how the building will appear both during day and night have been shown in the building illustrations. • The northeast corner is activated with a lounge/flex -space that opens out t o an outdoor patio . This seating area will provide an active and lively entry experience to Pentagon Village from Computer Avenue. • Ease of flow throughout the Village has always been a goal. There is both pedestrian and bike connections on the west side of the building, creating an inviting experience for pedestrians entering the Pentagon Village from Viking Drive. 494 100 N SITE Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:56:49 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtCover G000 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Project LocationProject Team Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: PENTAGON APARTMENTS, LLC Christian Lawrence Jay Scott Campbell Mithun Tower Minneapolis, MN 55402 Christian -(612) 913-4949 Jay -(651) 336-6060 clawrence@risemodular.com, OWNER 222 S 9th St, Suite 3700 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: CUNINGHAM GROUP David Stahl 201 Main Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 379-3400 ARCHITECT Suite 325 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: EMANUELSON-PODUS, INC Michael Webert, PE Mechanical Matthew Fults, PE Electrical 7705 Bush Lake Road Michael-(952) 540-4013, Matthew-(952) 540-4017 mwebert@epinc.com, mfults@epinc.com MEP CONSULTANT Edina, MN 55439 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC Ben Johnson 767 Eustis St (612) 326-9506 benjamin.johnson@kimley-horn.com CIVIL CONSULTANT St. Paul, MN, 55114 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: BKBM ENGINEERS, INC Anthony Radtke 6120 Earle Brown Drive, Suite 700 (763 843-0460 aradtke@bkbm.com STRUCTURAL CONSULTANT Minneapolis, MN 55430 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: JULEE QUARVE-PETERSON, INC 6345 Vincent Ave S (612) 709-2379 JQP_INC@yahoo.com ACCESSIBILITY CONSULTANT Minneapolis, MN 55423 Name: Contact: Address: Phone: FAX: E-Mail: GREYSTAR Bell Plaza Bloomington, MN 55431 (312) 205-6500 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3800 American Blvd W #950 JayScott@solomonre.com No. Date Description Sheet Index Number Sheet Name General G000 Cover Civil C300 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - Phase 1 C301 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan - Phase 2 C400 Site Plan C401 Access Plan C500 Grading and Drainage Plan C600 Utility Plan Landscape L100 Overall Site Layout Plan L300 Landscape Plan Architectural A001 Architectural Site Plan A011 Site Details A101 Level 1 Floor Plan A102 Level 2 Floor Plan A103 Level 3 Floor Plan A106 Level 6 Floor Plan A301 Building Elevations A302 Building Elevations DD D D D D D D DDD D A C C C C C C C E E E E E 4.85% 0.8 6 %3.24%2.26% 2.10%0.76%1.06%8.33%1.7 7 % 1.6 8 % SITE DISCHARGE VIKING DRIVE STORM SEWER NORTH EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. 5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF EDINA GRADING PERMIT. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION FILTER LOG LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMProject Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 KEYNOTE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FILTER LOG, OFFSET FROM FROM BACK OF CURB/PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY INLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FENCE A B C D E ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES BMP UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.1 FILTER LOG LF 1,281 INLET PROTECTION EA.12 SAFETY FENCE LF 1,382 C300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1 URBAN LAND UDORTHENTS, WET SUBSTRATUM, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES URBAN LAND-UDIPSAMMENTS (CUT AND FILL LAND) COMPLEX, 0 TO 2 PERCENT SLOPES SOIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGC C C C C D D D D D D D D D D E E E E E A A 2.24%10.6 0 % 1 . 7 7%1.60% 2.93% 2.89 % 1 . 7 7% 4.17%1.63%1.66%2.62% 821 822823824823824 82 2 8 2 3 8 2 4 SITE DISCHARGE VIKING DRIVE STORM SEWER NORTH PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMProject Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES 1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4. WITHIN ONE WEEK (7 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR MATERIALS. 5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR. 8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. 10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS. UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS. 2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE. 3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. 5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS. 6. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 7. TEMPORARILY SEED WITH PURE LIVE SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY NPDES AND/OR CITY OF EDINA GRADING PERMIT. SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION: ROCK ENTRANCE INLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SAFETY FENCE LEGEND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET KEYNOTE LEGEND CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FILTER LOG, OFFSET FROM FROM BACK OF CURB/PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY INLET PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION SAFETY FENCE A B C D E ESTIMATED BMP QUANTITIES BMP UNIT QUANTITY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA.2 FILTER LOG LF 1,104 INLET PROTECTION EA.10 SAFETY FENCE LF 1,458 C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2 FILTER LOG 12.1'306.5'179.5'PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKING4 PARKING ACCESS W/ OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR MAIN ENTRANCE APPROXIMATE STAIR EXIT PROPOSED BIKE ROOM ENTRANCE 21.1'7.9'6.0'18.0' 24'9.0'5.0'6.0'6.0'6.6'5.2'9.4'5.2'24.0'R57' R10' R10' R33'R33' 24' R57' R61' R80' R101' R101' R58' A A A AA B BB B B B B B CC C C C D E F G H H H I I I I I I I I J J J J J J J JJJ J K R15' R33'5.0'3.0'L L L L N LO P P PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENT EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT TO BE VACATED Q L BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 89,725 SF (2.06 AC) BUILDING AREA 54,400 SF (60.6% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING 4 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALLS / 1 STALLS PROPERTY SUMMARY PENTAGON APARTMENTS TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 89,725 SF (2.06 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 82,748 SF (7.90 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 6,977 SF (0.16 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA X,XXX SF (X.X AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD PROPOSED ZONING PUD PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = X' ROAD = X' BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = X' SIDE = X' REAR = X' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPSOED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARDS PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK DECORATIVE SIDEWALK, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS LANDSCAPE CURB, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT LOADING ZONE B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB FLAT CURB TRANSFORMER PAD STEPS/STAIRS/RISERS STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY <SURVEYOR>, DATED XX/XX/XXXX. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 10. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 11. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE <9'> IN WIDTH AND <18'> IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 16. THERE ARE <X.XX> ACRES OF WETLAND IMPACTS. 17. FOR OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS, SEE THE <OFFSITE PLANS> IMPROVEMENTS PLANS. NORTH C400 SITE PLAN PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK/STAMPED/COLORED PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADAADAADA Lock to Lock Time SU-30 Width Track Steering Angle 4.00 20.00 feet : : : 6.0 8.00 8.00 31.8: 30.00 PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE LEGEND PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 NORTH C401 ACCESS PLAN THE VEHICLE MANEUVERING IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED USING AUTOTURN SOFTWARE AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT ACTUAL CONDITIONS NOR DOES IT ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL FACTORS. THIS ANALYSIS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR THE CLIENT'S DECISION MAKING ADA ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO BUILDING ENTRANCE, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CROSS SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% AND LONGITUDINAL SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 5% PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGG:823.46 G:823.22 G:822.84 ME:822.74 ME:823.81 G:822.31 T/G:822.79 ME:822.00 G:822.20 T/G:822.67 ME/G:821.68 823.71 823.41 823.32 821.65 821.38 821.29 ME/T:821.00ME/G:821.46 ME/G:821.36 820.11 820.50 821.09 820.12 821.80 821.80 821.87 ME/T:820.02 ME/T:820.04 ME/T:821.01 821.11 ME/T:821.71 824.08 ME/T:823.94 824.17 ME/T:824.07 823.55 824.80 824.73 824.41 G:824.80 G:824.80 G:823.77 G:823.66 G:824.46 G:824.25 8218228238248228238238238248243.61% 2.90%2.40% 2.15% 2.88% 4.32%4.25%1.52%2.37%1.50%1.50%1. 8 4 % 1.48%1.87%1.24%1.52%1.52%1.50%1.49%18 LF - 18" PVC @ 2.00% 70 LF - 18" PVC @ 0.50% 822.62 822.52 822.62 822.53 824.80 824.80 EXISTING UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS/ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 8228238 2 4 LP:822.20 ST-2 RE:824.37 IE:820.85 E IE:820.85 S RD-1 IE:821.20 W ST-3 RE:821.60 IE:820.50 N CONNECT TO EXISTING 18" STORM SEWER FIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION ST-4 IE:818.20 SW CONNECT TO EXISTING 18" STORM SEWER FIELD VERIFY INVERT AND LOCATION ST-6 RE:822.20 IE:817.88 NE IE:817.88 SW DOGHOUSE OVER EX. 15" STORM, FIELD VERFIY INVERT AND LOCATION FOUR - 6" RISERS 1.40% 1.51%3.54%1.67%1.59% 1.59% POTENTIAL BIKE ROOM ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±821.80 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 POTENTIAL AMENITY DECK ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±822.10 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 823.92 ME/T:823.78 824.803.01% G:824.19 G:823.74 G:822.08 1.50%ONE - 8" RISER 822.02 821.93 G:822.40 POTENTIAL ACCESS DOOR, CURRENT ACCESSIBLE ELEVATION=±824.00 STAIRS REQUIRED TO MEET FFE=824.80 EOF 2.00%8228 2 3 824 821822LP:822.21 823.94 2. 3 5 % 2.16%1.26% 1.50% 1.33%1.73% 1.50% 1.57% 823 823 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTH C500 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS PROVIDED ON-SITE THROUGH AN EXISTING UNDERGROUND STORMTECH CHAMBER SYSTEM. PER THE APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PENTAGON VILLAGE, DATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (PROJECT # 0013450.00), THE SUBJECT LOT IS PART OF DRAINAGE AREA 13_2B, WHICH IS MANAGED BY CHAMBER SYSTEM #4. THIS DRAINAGE AREA ASSUMED AN IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE AREA OF 93.4% AS PART OF THE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED AND APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS. THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED SITE SURFACE AND ROOF DRAINAGE WILL ALSO BE ROUTED TO CHAMER SYSTEM #4. THE CURRENTLY PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE FOR THIS DRAINAGE AREA WILL BE 85.6%. THIS DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUSNESS WILL CONTINUE TO MEET CITY/WATERSHED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND PROVIDE AN IMPROVEMENT FROM THE CURRENT CONDITION. A REDUCTION OF RUNOFF RATES AND HIGH WATER LEVEL CAN BE EXPECTED WITH THIS AS WELL AS AN INCREASE IN TP AND TSS REMOVALS FROM THE SITE. STORMWATER WILL BE CONTROLLED AS TO LIMIT IMPACTS ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES THROUGH INTENTIONAL GRADING AND A SERIES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. SITE GRADING WILL BE DESIGNED TO DIRECT RUNOFF TOWARDS EXISTING AND PROPOSED INLETS ON SITE AND PROVIDE EMERGENCY OVERFLOWS TO THE SURROUNDING ROADWAY/PUBLIC STORM SYSTEM IN VIKING DRIVE. THE FINISHED FLOOR OF THE BUILDING WILL ALSO BE SET AT AN ELEVATION OF 824.80, WHICH PROVIDES 2.1' OF FREEBOARD FROM THE ORIGINALLY MODELLED 100-YR HWL (822.70) OF CHAMBER SYSTEM #4. ADDITIONALLY, BOULEVARDS AROUND THE SITE PERIMETER WILL ACT AS FILTER STRIPS FOR AREAS THAT CANNOT BE CAPTURED AND DIRECTLY ROUTED TO THE UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. STORMWATER MANAGMENT NARRATIVE PROPOSED BUILDING 54,400 SF FFE: 824.80 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVESHARED DRIVE NO PARKINGCONNECT EX 10" PVC SANITARY TO BUILDING PLUMBING, COORD WITH MEP. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY EX INVERT AND LOCATION IE: 811.90 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE, CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING, COORD WITH MEP. FDC RELOCATED FIRE HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY 6" DIP HYDRANT LEAD WETTAP EXISTING WATERMAIN PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PROPOSED POWER SERVICE, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE, COORDINATE WITH UTILITY EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN EXISTING 10" PVC SANITARY EXISTING UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS/ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 74.3' 8" FIRE WATER SERVICE, CONNECT TO BUILDING PLUMBING, COORD WITH MEP. CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN W/ WET TAP AND 6" VALVE EXISTING 8" WATERMAIN CONNECT TO EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN W/ WET TAP AND 8" VALVE EXISTING 10" WATERMAIN PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM©Project Information Project No.: Drawn By: Designed By: Date: Checked By:Scale: Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMITAPPLICATION No. Date Description 160000000 06/16/2021 AS NOTED BPG BPG WDM DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA. MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM D. MATZEK 6/16/2021 45790 UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-1785 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF EDINA AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO EXISTING PROPOSED 0' 5'10' 20'40'12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128" PARKING GARAGE 1 1 1 STORMWATER SYSTEM BELOW GRADE 2 3 4 22 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE LOADING ZONE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVENUE2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 PARKING STALLS (4) 5 TRANSFORMER PARKING GARAGE ENTRY FRONT ENTRY LOUNGE/FLEX SPACE ENTRY LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK Materials -Floors (Plans) CONCRETE - TYPE 1 PEDESTAL PAVER - TYPE 1 GRASS ASPHALT HARDWOOD MULCH ROCK MULCH CONCRETE - TYPE 2 PEDESTAL PAVER - TYPE 2 PAVER TYPE 1 WOOD ARTIFICIAL GRASS AMENITY DECK Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 1:18:38 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - PentagonApartments/LAND-21-0068_PentagonApartments-Central_mjones@cuningham.com.rvtOverall Site Layout Plan L100 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION N L100 1" = 20'-0" 1 Overall Site Layout Plan KEYNOTE LEGEND Circle Remark 1 Metal Raised Planter Bed 2 Public Art Piece - TBD 3 Dog Run - Fenced/K9 Grass 4 Bike Racks 5 Monument Sign No. Date Description 0' 5'10' 20'40' • PLANT SCHEDULE TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLAN IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. • CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS AND OTHER SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE PLANT MATERIAL SELECTIONS OR SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. • NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID AND/OR QUOTATION. • CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYOUT AND STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL. MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN(S). ALL STAKING AND BASE GRADING TO BE VERIFIED AND APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN FIELD PRIOR TO ANY FINAL SURFACE MATERIAL INSTALLATIONS. • ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. • NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAVE BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. • PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. • CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. • KEEP FINAL ELEVATIONS OF SOIL AND MULCH FROM BLOCKING INTENDED STORM WATER FLOW. SEE CIVIL AND/OR LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR GRADING PLAN. • SALVAGE TOPSOIL FOR REUSE FROM THE EARTHWORK AREAS AS APPROPRIATE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND STOCKPILE IN LOCATION APPROVED BY OWNER. PROJECT MANAGER TO REVIEW, DIRECT AND APPROVE ALL REQUIRED SOIL CORRECTIONS PRIOR TO BASE MATERIAL PLACEMENT. • CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE OF THE PROJECT SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL AREAS. • UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. • EDGE AREAS WHERE TURF/SOD MEET PLANTING BEDS AS SHOWN IN PLANS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. • SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING SHALL BE REPLACED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. • WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. • SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. • CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE SUCH AS WATERING AND WEEDING OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS, AND REPLACEMENTS, FOR ENTIRE WARRANTY PERIOD. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. • ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHOULD BE NOENICITINOID-FREE.12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128"STORMWATER SYSTEM BELOW GRADE ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 ACF 1 CEO 1 CEO 1 POT 2 LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK LEVEL 2 AMENITY DECK Materials -Planting GRASS - SPRAY IRRIGATION PLANTING BEDS - DRIP IRRIGATION AMENITY DECK Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 1:19:53 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - PentagonApartments/LAND-21-0068_PentagonApartments-Central_mjones@cuningham.com.rvtLandscape Plan L300 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION N Planting Notes L300 1" = 20'-0" 1 Overall Planting Plan Master Planting Schedule Type Mark Common Name Botanical Name Quantity Installed Size Coniferous Tree TAC Japanese Upright Yew Taxus cuspidata 'Capitata'6 6' BB Deciduous Tree ACF Autumn Blaze Maple Acer × freemanii 'Jeffersred' 6 2.5" BB CAC Firespire American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana 'J.N. Upright' 2 2.5" BB CEO Hackberry Celtis occidentalis 7 2.5" BB POT Quaking Aspen Populus tremuloides 2 2.5" BB Grasses CAA Karl Foerster calamagrostis acutiflora 265 #3 CONT PAV Switchgrass 'Heavy Metal' Panicum virgatum 'Heavy Metal' 510 #1 CONT SCS Little Bluestem 'Minn Blue" Schizachyrium scoparium 323 #2 CONT Perennial ECP Powwow White Coneflower Echinacea purpurea 'Powwow White' 103 #1 CONT SAN Salvia Caradonna Salvia nemorosa caradonna 249 #2 CONT Shrub - Coniferous JUC Sea Green Juniper Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 21 #5 CONT Shrub - Deciduous COS Firedance Dogwood Cornus sericea 'Bailadeline' 1 #5 CONT RHA Gro-low Fragrant Sumac Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'8 #5 CONT RHO P.J.M. Rhododendron Rhododendron x 'P.J.M' (H-1) 14 #5 CONT Vines HAP Climbing Honeysuckle Hydrangea anomala subsp. petiolaris 17 #1 CONT No. Date Description 12' - 0"21' - 0"16' - 3 69/128" ENTRY ELEV ELEV ELEV STAIR STAIR BIKE ENTRY 1. ALL DIMENSIONS TO THE PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FACE OF EXTERIOR FINISH WHILE ALL GRID LINES AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE ON THE FACE OF THE EXTERIOR STRUCTURE. 2. ALL INTERIOR BEARING WALLS (SEE STRUCTURAL DRWAINGS FOR LOCATIONS), SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH 1 HOUR BARRIER 3. PROVIDE CLASS I STANDPIPES PER SECTION 905 WITH 2 1/2" OUTLET IN STAIR SHAFTS AT EACH STAIR LANDING 4. ALL STEEL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS, COLUMNS AND BEAMS, SHALL RECEIVE FIREPROOFING SPRAY PER RATING REQUIREMENT SHOWN ON R004 5. SEE ENLARGED STAIR PLAN FOR LOCATION OF STANDPIPES 6. PROVIDE OVERFLOW DRAIN WHERE AREA/FLOOR DRAIN IS SHOWN AS REQUIRED. 7. ALL ROOF DRAINS TO FLOW TO STORMWATER PLANTERS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 8. FINISH GRADE AT COURT YARDS, PORDIUM, PATIO AND BALCONY SHALL BE 2% MAX AT ALL DIRECTIONS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE PLAN. 9. SEE LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR SITE WORK ADDITIONAL NOTES FOR ELECTRICAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE) 1. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PLAN CHECK IS REQUIRED TO VERIFY THE RACEWAY METHOD(s), WIRING SCHEMATICS AND ELECTRICAL CALCULATIONS FOR THE ELECTRICAL CHARGING SYSTEM" 2. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL ELECTRICAL VEHICALS AT THEIR FULL RATED AMPERAGE 3. A LABEL STATING "EV CAPABLE" SHALL BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE AT THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL AND NEXT TO THE RACEWAY TERMINATION POINT" P.A. TO CONFIRM IF OVERFLOW DRAIN IS REQUIRED EDITOR'S NOTE: WORK POINT WP Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:40 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtArchitectural Site Plan A001 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION A001 1" = 20'-0" 1 Architectural Site Site Plan Notes N PULL IN PARKING LEGEND AS REQUIRED PER PROJECT EDITOR'S NOTE: Site Plan Graphic Symobls Keynote Legend No. Date Description Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:56:40 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtSite Details A011 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION No. Date Description SITE - LOT 3 SITE - LOT 3 1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 TRASH APPROX 1600 SF MAILAPPROX 325 SFRR RR PUBLIC VENUE APPROX 875 SF PACKAGES APPROX 300 SF LOBBY APPROX 2400 SF CONF APPROX 240 SF NORTHERN PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE TO CONTINUE TO BE EXPLORED AND REFINED PER CLIENTS MOST RECENT FEEDBACK LEASING APPROX 400 SF LOUNGE / FLEX SPACE APPROX 600 SF WASH APPROX 150 SF BIKE STORAGE APPROX 530 SF PARKING 152 STALLS181' - 6"312'-0" PRIMARY LOBBY ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOUNGE ENTRANCE STAIR EXIT 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. 2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD. 3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL. 5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS. 13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302. 15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG. 16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001. 17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD. Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:42 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 1 Floor Plan A101 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Level 1 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend N No. Date Description 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. 2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD. 3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL. 5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS. 13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302. 15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG. 16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001. 17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD.1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 FITNESS APPROX 650 SF STUDIO APPROX 130 SF RR RR CLUBROOM APPROX 1100 SF STORAGE APPROX 250 SF CORRIDOR B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4 AMENITY DECK MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EXIT181' - 6"318'-0" Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:44 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 2 Floor Plan A102 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend Level 2 N No. Date Description 1A3022 A3012A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4A2A2A3A3 181' - 6"318'-0" 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. 2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD. 3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL. 5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS. 13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302. 15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG. 16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001. 17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD. Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:45 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 3 Floor Plan A103 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Level 3 - Level 5 TYP 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes Keynote Legend N No. Date Description 1. ALL MASONRY DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. 2. CONCRETE AND CMU WALLS WITH ADDITIONAL FINISHES ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF STUD. 3. ALL EXTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD WALL SYSTEMS ARE DIMENSIONED TO EXTERIOR FACE OF STUD. 4. ALL INTERIOR STEEL STUD AND WOOD STUD PARTITIONS ARE DIMENSIONED TO FACE OF SHEATHING OR CENTERLINE OF STUD, WHERE INDICATED BY 'CL' SYMBOL. 5. WINDOWS ARE DIMENSIONED EITHER TO CENTERLINE OF WINDOW OR EDGE OF FRAME. 6. REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR ALL SITE FEATURES INCLUDING SITE WALLS, PLANTERS, SEATING, FLOOR/PAVING FINISHES, AND COURTYARD AND POOL DECK EQUIPMENT AND OTHER AMENITIES. 7. ALL LEVEL 1 EXTERIOR WALLS (EXCLUDING CMU AND CONCRETE) SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 8. ALL LEVEL 2 THRU 6 EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE (WALL TYPE) UNLESS TAGGED OTHERWISE ON 1/8" PLANS AND/OR ENLARGED PLANS. ALSO SEE THE WALL SECTIONS. 9. SEE UNIT PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 10. PROVIDE FIRE RETARDENT PLYWOOD AT FULL BACK WALL OF ALL IDF CLOSETS. 11. ALL DOORS SHALL BE LOCATED 6" FROM ADJACENT WALL TO EDGE OF DOOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE AND EXIT SIGNS FOR ALL EXIT DOORS AS INDICATED ON EXIT PLANS. 13. VERIFY ALL THE SHAFT SIZES SHOWN ON PLANS WITH VENDORS AND EQUIPMENT. NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF NECESSARY CHANGES IN SHAFT DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 14. FOR SIGNAGE DETAILS SEE R301 & R302. 15. ALL EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE 1HR RATED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE IN THE WALL SYSTEM TAG. 16. SPRAY APPLIED FIREPROOFING TO BE PROVIDED AT ALL STEEL COLUMN & BEAMS, EXCEPT WHERE INTUMESCENT PAINT IS REQUIRED AT EXPOSED STEEL OR WHERE 3/4" OR LESS SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR FIREPROOFING. SEE RATING REQUIRED ON SHEET R001. 17. DECK AREA DRAINS SHALL BE LOCATED IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH SLOPE APPROX. 1/8" PER FOOT AND NO MORE THAN 1/4" PER FOOT. COORDINATE THE LOCATION IN FIELD.1A3022A3021 A301 1 A401 1 A401 2 A401 2 A401 OUTDOOR SUN DECK APPROX 640 SF (OR POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR A UNIT) RR INDOOR SUN DECK APPROX 280 SF (OR POTENTIAL LOCATION FOR A UNIT) B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 B2B2 A4 A4 A4 E1 A3 A2 A2 A3 A3 A2 A2 A3 E2 A4 A4 B1 B1 A2 A2 A2A2 E3 E3 A3 A3 A3 A3 E4A2 A2 A3A3 181' - 6"318'-0" Sheet Number Sheet Title ©Copyright by Cuningham (All Rights Reserved) Current Revision Revisions Project Information Project No.:PIC / AIC: Date:Phase: Drawing Package 201 Main Street SE | Suite 325 | Minneapolis | MN 55414 cuningham.com 6/16/2021 4:43:46 PMBIM 360://21-0068 - RISE and Solomon Real Estate Group - Pentagon Apartments/21-0068_Pentagon_Apartments.rvtLevel 6 Floor Plan A106 2021 Pentagon Apartments PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 21-0068 06/16/2021DD JS PRELIMINARY REZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 1 2 3 4 Keyplan Floor Plan General Notes A106 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 Level 6 Keynote Legend N No. Date Description Pentagon Apartments - Daytime Render From the North West 06/15/21 Pentagon Apartments - Daytime Render From the South East 06/15/21 Pentagon Apartments - Night Time Render From the North West 06/15/21 File #227702810 July 7, 2021 DRAFT Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 4911 77th Street W in Edina, MN July 2021 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-3 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES ................................................ 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PEAK HOUR LOS RESULTS .......................................... 5-5 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: July 7, 2021 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 July 2021 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4911 77th Street W. in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the Computer Avenue/Viking Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street/development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp • Computer Avenue/development access The proposed project will involve constructing a new apartment building with 200 dwelling units. The project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp. As shown in the site plan, the site has access to the internal street system within the Pentagon South development. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected for previous studies in this area was used at all intersections to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle July 2021 1-2 DRAFT maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 2 62 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. • The current City parking ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit, which equates to 250 stalls. • The expected parking demand for the first phase of office space (19,000 square feet) and a 235 room hotel within Pentagon South was calculated to be 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed new residential building located at 4911 77th Street W. in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the Computer Avenue/Viking Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development at the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street/development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp • Computer Avenue/development access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve constructing a new apartment building with 200 dwelling units. The project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp. As shown in the site plan, the site has access to the internal street system within the Pentagon South development. The project is expected to be completed in 2023. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. July 2021 2-2 DRAFT July 2021 2-3 DRAFT July 2021 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The project site is currently vacant land within the previously approved Pentagon South development. The site is bounded by Computer Avenue on the east, Viking Drive on the south, and the Pentagon South development on the north and west. Near the site location, 77th Street is a five-lane roadway with a center left turn lane. Computer Avenue and Parklawn Avenue are two-lane roadways. To the west of the site, 77th Street intersects with TH 100 at a full grade separated interchange. The speed limit on all local streets in the study area is 30 miles per hour. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through lane and two right turn lanes. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The south leg provides access a commercial use on the south side of 77th Street. 77th Street W./Computer Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one left turn/through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The north leg provides access to an office use on the north side of 77 th Street. 77th Street W./development access This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one left turn/through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn/through/right turn lane. The north leg provides access to an office use on the north side of 77th Street. 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound approach provides on left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides two left turn lanes and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one channelized right turn lane. July 2021 3-2 DRAFT Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp This four-way intersection is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound app roach provides on left turn lane, one through lane, and one through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lane s, and one channelized right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The southbound approach provides two left turn lanes, one through lane, and one right turn lane. Computer Avenue/development access This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound developmen t access approach. The eastbound approach provides one left/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn/through lane. The southbound approach provides one through/right turn lane. Traffic Volume Data Existing turn movement data previously collected for other studies in the area was obtained from City staff for the following intersections: • 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue • 77th Street W./Computer Avenue • 77th Street W./development access • 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp • Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp July 2021 3-3 DRAFT July 2021 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2024. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2021 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses near the project site. • 2024 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2024 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth due to additional development in the area. • 2024 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2024 No-Build volumes to determine 2024 Build volumes. Estimation of Existing Volumes Due to COVID-19 Impacts The impacts of COVID-19 have resulted in significant reductions in traffic volumes due to changes in work and travel habits. Traffic volume data collected for studies completed prior to the pandemic were used for the traffic forecasts presented in this report. Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Apartments 200 DU 19 53 72 54 34 88 1088 DU=dwelling unit As shown, the project adds 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. July 2021 4-2 DRAFT Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 25 percent to/from the north on TH 100 • 25 percent to/from the south on TH 100 • 25 percent to/from the west on Edina Industrial Boulevard • 2 percent to/from the south on Computer Avenue • 11 percent to/from the north on Parklawn Avenue • 12 percent to/from the east on 77th Street Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 4. July 2021 4-3 DRAFT July 2021 5-1 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro/SimTraffic software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The follow ing is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and con venience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. July 2021 5-2 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are shown in Figure 5 and are discussed below. 77th Street W./Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. 77th Street W./Computer Avenue (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D or better for all scenarios. 77th Street W./development access (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. 77th Street W./TH 100 NB ramp (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C or better for all scenarios. Edina Industrial Blvd/TH 100 SB ramp (traffic signal control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. July 2021 5-3 DRAFT Computer Avenue/access (minor street stop control) During the a.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021, 2024 No-Build, and 2024 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. Overall Traffic Impact The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. Comparison to Pentagon South Traffic Study The traffic volume forecasts for the current project were compared to forecasts presented in the Pentagon South traffic study dated May 2, 2018. The Pentagon South traffic study accounted for full development of the site assuming a 153 room hotel on the current project site. A comparison of the trip generation for the previous hotel use to the current apartment use is shown in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Trip Generation Comparison for Proposed Project and Previous Use Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed use Apartments 200 DU 19 53 72 54 34 88 1088 Previous study use Hotel 153 rooms 42 30 72 47 45 92 1279 DU=dwelling unit As shown, the proposed apartment use generates the same number of trips during the a.m. peak hour, 4 fewer trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 191 fewer daily trips. Overall, the proposed apartment use has less impact to traffic operations than the previously assumed hotel use. Therefore, the results and recommendations from the Pentagon South traffic study are not impacted and are still valid. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on the south side of 77th Street, the west side of Parklawn Avenue, and the west side of Computer Avenue. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is located north of the project site. All intersections in the study have crosswalks across all or a portion of the approaches. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. July 2021 5-4 DRAFT Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. Transit Facilities The subject site presently is served by the Metro Transit bus routes 6 and 540. Bus stops exist on 77th Street at the development access and at Computer Avenue. Potential Travel Demand Management Measures The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: • Providing maps that show the area bus routes, light rail and bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. • Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. • Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. • Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 5-5 DRAFT July 2021 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project is expected to include 157 on-site parking stalls. The project will also use stalls in the adjacent parking ramp which has 423 stalls. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 262 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. The current City ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit , which equates to 250 stalls. The expected parking demand was also calculated for additional development within the Pentagon South development. The parking demand was calculated for the first phase of office space of 19,000 square feet and a 235 room hotel. The peak parking demand for these uses is 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. July 2021 7-1 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to add 72 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 88 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,088 net trips daily. Net trips account for new trips generated by the development and trips eliminated by removal of the existing office space. • The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development are expected to have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements are needed at the subject intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Traffic volume data collected for previous studies in this area was used at all intersections to avoid traffic volume reductions that have occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacts. This process resulted in reasonable estimates for the weekday peak hours that would occur under non-pandemic conditions. • Future plans for this area include a new primary sidewalk on 77th Street. Future plans for this area also include a conventional bike lane on 77th Street. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. • The project owner is encouraged to provide bicycle parking spaces to promote bicycle use by residents. Long-term spaces for residents within the building and outside racks for short-term parking are recommended. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station will also help encourage bicycle use by residents. • Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site 262 spaces. The 157 spaces on-site are 105 spaces less than the expected peak parking demand. • The current City parking ordinance is 2 stalls per unit, which equates to 400 stalls. The proposed draft parking ordinance that is in front of the City Council is 1.25 stalls per unit, which equates to 250 stalls. • The expected parking demand for the first phase of office space (19,000 square feet) and a 235 room hotel within Pentagon South was calculated to be 177 spaces from 6-8 a.m. Combining this peak demand with the portion of the apartment peak demand that would use the parking ramp (105 spaces) results in a total demand of 282 spaces. This peak demand is 141 spaces less than the total 423 spaces in the parking ramp. • The project owner is encouraged to implement Travel Demand Management strategies for this site with the goal of reducing vehicular trips during peak hours and reducing carbon emissions from vehicles. Potential strategies for this site include: July 2021 7-2 DRAFT o Providing maps that show the area bus routes, bus schedules, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities. o Providing information on starting and joining commuter programs. o Providing charging stations for electric vehicles in the resident parking areas. o Providing long-term and short-term bicycle parking spaces for apartment residents. o Offering a pre-paid Metro Transit Go-To Card to all new residents. July 2021 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 3 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 1 SITE PLAN Site 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 1 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 4 SITE PLAN REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RETOFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 5 DATA TABLE SUMMARY OFFICE 1 OFFICE 2 HOTEL 1 HOTEL 2 PARKING (office) PARKING (hotel) RETAIL 1 RETAIL 2 RETAIL / OFFICE 25,000sf per floor5 floors125,000sf total 20,000sf per floor5 floors100,000sf total 193 keys4 floors 153 keys4 floors 1,155 spaces 390 spaces 7,500 sf 4,300 sf 19,000 sf 70 spaces 125spaces REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RET /OFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 14 DIAGRAM: GREEN CONNECTIONS NMCRT&FREDRICHARDSPARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 15 SITE ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 16 AERIAL LOOKING SOUTH 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 17 NORTHWEST CORNER & PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 27 CENTRAL PARK 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 28 PARK & OFFICE 2 ENTRY 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 29 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL DROP OFF 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 30 PARKING DECK AND HOTEL 9 APRIL 2018 PENTAGON PARK SOUTH EDINA, MN 31 VIKING DRIVE DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE NO. 2019-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-17 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (h) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 602 stalls www.pentagonvillageedina.com development April 23, 2021PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS21-0068 SKETCH PLAN SUBMITTAL 4911 77th St W Edina, MN Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South 1000 ft N➤➤NImage Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 2 21-0068 EDINA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Economic Vitality and Competitiveness Urban Design Land Use Transportation and Mobility Parks and Public Life District Services and Facilities Sustainability Water Resources PUBLIC AMENITIES GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT Concentration of jobs, residences, medical services, traffic, and activity. Attracting residents, workers, customers, patients, visitors, and others from throughout the region, Greater Southdale District is a major destination. Role as economic engine for the city and region. The economic impact of this area is significant, particularly in terms of sustaining the tax base for the City of Edina. Meeting diverse housing needs of the population. Greater Southdale District has a variety of diverse housing types that meet the needs of Edina residents, and are not generally available in many areas of the city. Retail and services hub for the community. In addition to its role in the regional economy, Greater Southdale District meets the needs of the community for retail and services, with the capacity to evolve for changing preferences. Capacity for growth and change. The Greater Southdale District has been an evolving area since its inception. It has more capacity for growth and change than many other areas of the city. GREATER SOUTHDALE DISTRICT CORE ELEMENTS SITE AS MOBILITY HUB Mobility Hubs. Bringing together different modes of travel – walking, transit, biking, and shared mobility - and integrating the location with information technology to help travelers find, access, and pay for transit and shared mobility services creates a mobility hub. Strategically locating mobility hubs at gateways to the District (Southdale Center, Centennial Lakes and near Highway 100 in the 76th Street/77th Street corridor), encourages people to access the heart of the district by modes other than cars. A network of green, lined by community-focused destinations will create a diverse set of opportunities for people to participate as a community across the Greater Southdale District. The red dots represent mobility hubs and the yellow circles represent ½ mile walking distance. The intent of the Mobility Hub location is to encourage pedestrian to use the central-spine-like Centennial Lakes Park and or the Promenade as the main corridor to get to events, shopping and home. For residents, the experience of walking home should be the best part of the day, marked by a chance encounter, a pickup game of basketball, or an early meal out. The same can be said for visitors arriving at one the three Mobility Hubs: “It’s never too far to walk to where you want to go within the Greater Southdale District!” SITE SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 3 21-0068 Modular Construction o Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction o Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood. o Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction o Controlled production environment minimizes site risks while improving build quality and worker safety. o Decreases energy consumption during construction o Reduction of overall emissions by decreasing deliveries to site Energy and Carbon o Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina) o Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction o Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance o LED lighting throughout Water and Wastewater o Looking at the percentage of pervious surface on the property and maintaining as much as possible o Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout o Efficient plumbing layout and design o Potential for non-potable water reuse o Thoughtful stormwater management o Efficient irrigation and potential water reuse strategies Place and Ecology o Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem o Will carefully consider what % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants can be used o Increase tree canopy at property (zero trees currently on site) o Drought tolerant landscape o Pollinator friendly landscape o Green outdoor amenity deck: amenity lawn / garden conceals parking below podium Materials and Circularity o Manage construction waste o Waste management plan for building o Recycling provided for residential units o Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units o Use of products with recycled content and ingredient transparency as much as possible o Use of regional materials where possible Equity and Justice o 10% of residential units will be affordable o Promote alternative transportation o Bicycle parking near main entry for guests o Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents o Potential for EV charging stations to be provided o Potential to provide parking for car-sharing vehicles REGENERATIVE DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 4 21-0068 2000 ft N➤➤N Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Image Landsat / Copernicus Edina Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 47,941 55,000 60,000 63,600 Households 20,672 24,000 27,700 29,800 Employment 47,457 51,800 54,000 56,100 100 494 VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVE77TH ST. W trail public transit route transit stop park wetland Highly Connected Located in 9 Mile Creek Watershed Challenged Water Table Borders City of Bloomington Main Roads Trails / Transit Wetlands and Parks SITE MAP Nord Myr Park Fred Richards Park www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 5 21-0068 9 MILE CREEK REGIONAL TRAIL Imagery ©2021 Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA Farm Service Agency, Map data ©2021 200 ft Image capture: May 2018 Images may be subject to copyright. Hema latha Thotakura Photo - May 2018 Fred Richards Park 9 Mile Creek Trail9 Mile Creek Trail On Street Trail FRED RICHARDS PARK PENTAGON VILLAGE SITE CONTEXT FOOD JOBS PARKS SCHOOLS www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 6 21-0068 SITE FROM SOUTH SITE FROM EAST LOT 3 - FROM EAST PLAZA TRELLIS PARKING STRUCTURE SITE ENTRY FROM EAST PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE PLAZA VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE THE PLAZA AT PENTAGON VILLAGE EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 7 21-0068 The master plan is organized around The Plaza at Pentagon Village framed with the buildings, creating a village commons. Ample green space and landscaping allow people to access the plaza from surrounding neighborhood and the building front doors. The office space and a dual brand hotel surround the plaza, with retailers and restaurants easily accessible via pedestrian walkways. Designed as a programmable space, the plaza will host events, concerts and other social opportunities year-round. Two retail spaces frame the entrance and act as the front doors to the development. The master plan highlights the building exteriors with an “urban edge” design style. This makes the architectural details of the buildings visible from the nearby highways. Materials like aluminum, metal, glass and landscaped screen walls add texture and depth to the buildings. PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN PROPOSED SITE www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 8 21-0068 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN - LOT 3 EXTENDED STAY HOTEL PROPOSED APARTMENT BUILDING 6 STORY APARTMENT BUILDING PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE - LOT 3 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 9 21-0068 LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 5 - PROPOSED OFFICE RENDER LOT 2 - APPROVED HOTEL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION LOT 1 - EXISTING COMMERCIAL ELEVATION PENTAGON VILLAGE DESIGN CHARACTER FOR REFERENCE ONLY www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 10 21-0068 VIKING DRIVE PARKING RAMP COMPUTER AVENUESITE PLAN 1 2 3 Entry Lobby Art Walk Residential Patios 4 5 6 Pool Fire Pit Bike Lounge 7 8 Bike Parking Move In Zone 1 2 4 6 5 8 7 DEDICATED SPACE FOR EASE OF LARGER SIZED VEHICLES TO PARK AS NEW RESIDENTS MOVE. DEDICATED PARKING FOR BIKERS ADJACENT TO THE BIKE LOUNGE AND EXTERIOR TRAILS. INDOOR AMENITY WITH QUICK CONNECTION TO THE OUTSIDE TRAIL CONNECTIONS WITH BIKE PARKING. OUTDOOR AMENITY FOR SOCIAL GATHERING THAT HAS VIEW OUT OF THE CITY. THE PRIMARY EXTERIOR AMENITY ON THE AMENITY DECK. PROVIDES EXTERIOR PRIVATE SPACES FOR LOWER LEVEL RESI- DENTS THE MAIN WALK TO THE BUILDING AND CAMPUS. CREATES A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE AND SENSE OF ARRIVAL. WELCOME GUESTS AND RESIDENTS WITH ART, LANDSCAPE, OR EXTERIOR FEATURE AS THEY ENTER THE BUILDING.. 9 Stormwater Management Strategies BELOW GRADE FILTRATION TANKS. CAPTURE AND TREAT STORMWATER ON SITE. 3 3 39 www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 11 21-0068 EXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE INTERNAL DRIVE VIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVELOBBY BIKELOUNGEENCLOSED PARKING FLEXIBLE SPACEFLOOR PLAN - GROUND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 12 21-0068 AMENITY SPACE UNITS UNITS AMENITY DECK FLOOR PLAN - 2ND FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 13 21-0068 UNITS UNITS FLOOR PLANS - 3RD - 6TH FLOOR www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 14 21-0068 0' 68'PROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEPROPERTYLINEVIKING DRIVE COMPUTER AVEEXISTING PARKING STRUCTURE PROPERTYLINEFUTURE HOTEL FUTURE HOTEL 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 FUTURE COMMERCIAL INTERNAL DRIVE 0' 68' ~71' T.O. PARAPET 5 STORIES OF TYPE IIIB 1 STORY OF TYPE 1 MASSING SECTION - BUILDING HEIGHTS BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - EAST/WEST BUILDING SECTION DIAGRAM - NORTH/SOUTH www.pentagonvillageedina.com development Pentagon Village Apartments - Sketch Plan Submittal Edina, MN April 23, 2021 | PAGE 15 21-0068 Total Bldg. GSF 232,965 Total Acres 1.78 Density (U.P.A.)107.01 Total SF 77,340 Level 1 Coverage (%) 72% FAR 3.01 Level 1 55,800 Level 2 36,485 Level 3 35,170 Level 4 35,170 Level 5 35,170 Level 6 35,170 232,965 New Parking Stalls Surface 5 Parking Structure (first level of proposed apartment building)161 Existing Parking Stalls (used for the proposed aparment building) Surface 0 Parking Structure 84 Parking Stalls/ Unit 1.25 T O T A L P A R K I N G 250 S I T E M E T R I C S T O T A L B U I L D I N G M E T R I C S Gross Building S Q U A R E F O O T A G E B Y F L O O R AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE SOUTH EAST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH WEST AXON VIEW FROM THE NORTH EAST MASSING CO M P U T E R A V E COMPUTER AVEVIKING BLVD DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2021-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2019-17 on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Revised Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the revised plans for 4911 77th Street West as approved by City Council Resolution No. 2021-___ on file in the office of the Planning Department. (d) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (e) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX (g) Development Standards. (h) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (i) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 602 stalls Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk The CITY of EDINA Zoning Ordinance Amendment & Site Plan Review – Pentagon Village The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 5 S i t e The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 6 S i t e The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 8 Approved PUD – Pentagon Park South The CITY of EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 9 Enhanced architecture Enhance bike and pedestrian experience Exterior bike racks on both east and west sides of the building and an interior bike room The northern edge of the building and site has been carefully considered as both a vehicular and pedestrian entry experience into the Pentagon Village. The main entry to the building is placed at the northwest corner to draw guests into the site and reflect some of the energy generated from the central plaza. The northeast corner is activated with a lounge/flex-space that opens out to an outdoor patio. This seating area will provide an active and lively entry experience to Pentagon Village from Computer Avenue. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINAThis Request Requires: EdinaMN.gov 13 A Zoning Ordinance Amendment to change the use and approved development plans, including revised final site plan approval for this site within the existing PUD-17 District. The PUD Zoning is used to ensure affordable housing on the site. The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY of EDINAReview of the Site Plan EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 18 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 19 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 20 PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet NA 21 feet NA 12 feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district 6 stories and 68 feet Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet 20 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% 1.5% The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 21 The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issue Is the proposal reasonable to justify the revised PUD rezoning of the site? EdinaMN.gov 22 1. The proposed use is allowed as a permitted principal use in the existing PUD-17 Zoning District. (See the attached PUD-17 Ordinance) Residential uses are encouraged to activate the public spaces beyond the hours of 9 am to 5 pm. Residential housing would support the retail uses within the development and area. 2. The site plan is generally consistent with the approved site plan for the site. 3. The proposal includes the provision of 20 units within the development to be dedicated for affordable housing. The proposed project would help the City meet its affordable housing goals established with the Metropolitan Council of 1,804 new affordable housing units by the year 2030. The CITY of EDINABetter Together Edina EdinaMN.gov 23 The CITY of EDINARecommendation EdinaMN.gov 24 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 26 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 27 The CITY of EDINA EdinaMN.gov 28 BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 121-0068 development VIEW FROM THE NW PROJECT LOCATION PENTAGON VILLAGE - RENDER PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 221-0068 development Viking Drive Edina Industrial Bvld 77th St.Computer DriveNormandale RoadHwy 100FUTURE OFFICE/ COMMERCIAL FUTURE HOTEL EXISTING PARKING FUTURE REST. EXIST. REST. EXIST. COMM. DAY CARE CREDIT UNION CAR WASH OFFICE OFFICE FORMER RESTAURANT EXIST. PARKING EXIST. DRIVE EXISTING PLAZA EXIST. PARKING EXISTING RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 200' to the EAST FUTURE SITE CONNECTION TO 9 MILE CREEK TRAIL 9 MILE CREEK TRAIL PREVIOUSLY APPROVED - PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN Lot 3Project Location Lot 5 Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 4 LOT 1 EXISTING RESTAURANT EXISTING COMMERCIAL LOT 2 FUTURE DUAL BRANDED HOTEL LOT 3 SITE IN QUESTION Project Location LOT 4 FUTURE COMMERCIAL / OFFICE BUILDING LOT 5 EXISTING PENTAGON PARK PLAZA EXISTING PENTAGON PARK PARKING STRUCTURE FUTURE OFFICE / RESTAURANT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 321-0068 development EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Lot 3Project Location Lot 3Project Location PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 421-0068 development SITE PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 521-0068 development PROPOSED PLANTING MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 621-0068 development BUILDING RENDER VIEW FROM THE NW PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 721-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE SE PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 821-0068 development EXTERIOR MATERIALS PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 921-0068 development 07/14/21 Pentagon Apartments - Level 1 L313 1" = 10'-0" 1 Level 1 LEVEL 1 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 1021-0068 development 18"07/14/21 Pentagon Apartments - Level 2 L312 1" = 10'-0" 1 Level 2 LEVEL 2 PLAN PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 1121-0068 development MODULAR CONSTRUCTION PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 1221-0068 development REGENERATIVE DESIGN AND SUSTAINABILITY Modular Construction o Reduction in construction waste compared to typical stick-built construction o Completing site and foundation work in parallel to modular manufacturing helps to reduce overall construction duration by 30% to 50% minimizing disruption to surrounding neighborhood. o Minimization of site disturbance during staging and construction o Controlled production environment minimizes site risks while improving build quality and worker safety. o Decreases energy consumption during construction o Reduction of overall emissions by decreasing deliveries to site Energy and Carbon o Building will benchmark, report yearly energy consumption per the Efficient Building Benchmarking Ordinance (City of Edina) o Reduction in energy use through well-insulated building, inherent in modular construction o Utilize Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance o LED lighting throughout o Investigating Solar Viability, Solar Ready o Landscaped Amenity Deck / Planted Roof o High Solar Reflectance Roof Water and Wastewater o Looking at the percentage of pervious surface on the property and maintaining as much as possible o Water conserving plumbing fixtures throughout o Efficient plumbing layout and design o Potential for non-potable water reuse o Thoughtful storm water management o Efficient irrigation and potential water reuse strategies Place and Ecology o Take into consideration how the landscaping can support the natural ecosystem o Will carefully consider what % of landscape, % Rain gardens, % native plants, % pollinator friendly plants can be used o Increase tree canopy at property (zero trees currently on site) o Drought tolerant landscape o Pollinator friendly landscape o Green outdoor amenity deck: amenity lawn / garden conceals parking below podium Materials and Circularity o Manage construction waste o Waste management plan for building o Recycling provided for residential units o Potential for organics recycling / composting to be provided for residential units o Use of products with recycled content and ingredient transparency as much as possible o Use of regional materials where possible Equity and Justice o 10% of residential units will be affordable o Promote alternative transportation o Ample Bicycle parking near main entry for guests o Interior, sheltered bicycle storage for residents o 5-10% Electric Vehicle Stations in place. o 50% EV ready with space allocated for 100%. o Car share program planned. PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 1321-0068 development RENDERING VIEW FROM THE NW - NIGHT PENTAGON VILLAGE APARTMENTS - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING JULY 14, 2021 Edina, Minnesota July 14, 2021 | PAGE 1421-0068 development