Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-01-03 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2001 7:30 P.M., EDINA COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50TH STREET I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: November 29, 2000 II. OLD BUSINESS: S-00-5 Preliminary Plat Approval JMS, Inc. 5012 Oxford Avenue and 5343 Interlachen Boulevard Brookside Heights III. NEW BUSINESS: LD-01-1 Delores Wentworth 5217 and 5219 Malibu Drive IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 31, 2001 V. ADJOURNMENT: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2001, 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4801 WEST 50 TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, David Byron, John Lonsbury, Ann Swenson, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, Charles Ingwalson, Geoffrey Workinger and Lorelei Bergman STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the November 29, 2000, meeting were filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS: Preliminary Plat JMS, Inc. S-00-5 Brookside Heights Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the Planning Commission reviewed a five lot, zero lot line development of this property at their November 1, 2000, meeting. That proposal was viewed under multi-family zoning standards, and would have required a rezoning of the property. After hearing testimony and comments from the Commission the request was withdrawn. The proponent submitted a revised plan, a four lot conventional plat, for the November 29, meeting. The Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat. After the meeting it was discovered that errors were made in data representing the 500 foot Neighborhood, which requires that the proposal return to the Commission. Mr. Larsen concluded although all of the lots require variances, this is a development that fits its neighborhood. The most important measure, lot width, fits the development pattern in the Brookside Heights neighborhood. The numbers are skewed because this property is at the edge of the neighborhood causing the larger lots to the north and west to become part of the formula. The best way to ensure that the new houses are compatible in size and scale with existing homes is to provide a similar lot width. The one and a half story homes the developer intends to build would be compatible. If the plat were reduced to 3 lots, variances would still be required. However, 3 larger lots would likely result in homes much larger than the typical home in Brookside Heights. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval, including the requested variances conditioned on: 1. Final Plat approval 2. Subdivision dedication 3. Watershed District permits 4. New homes would conform in size and scale to the plans presented. Mr. Roger Anderson and Mr. Rob Pleggman were present representing the applicant, Mr. Jeff Schoenwetter. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen what the problem is concerning water run-off. Mr. Larsen explained water runs down Oxford Avenue, crosses Interlachen Boulevard and continues down Hollywood Road to the low ponding area. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said in 1987 the home located at 5340 Hollywood Road received property run-off damage. Mr. Larsen said events such as the 1987 flood are difficult to plan for, but changes have been made to the system in an attempt to prevent future problems. Commissioner Ingwalson commented he supported the proposal that was presented at the last meeting, and pointed out that proposal depicted a different set of numbers. Mr. Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen what changed since the last meeting. Mr. Larsen told the Commission he apologizes for the incorrect numbers presented at the last meeting. He reminded the Commission at that meeting it was brought up by residents that there is a discrepancy with the numbers. Mr. Larsen explained the next day staff recalculated the 500 foot neighborhood and found the numbers presented by the proponent were correct but an incorrect scale was used in calculating the neighborhood resulting in incorrect numbers. Mr. Larsen said staff decided another meeting was needed to present the Commission with the correct numbers. Mr. Rob Pleggman, explained to the Commission the design concepts for the proposed homes have not changed from the previous meeting. Mr. Pleggman asked the Commission to note the home now proposed for the corner lot is a rambler as requested by the Commission at their last meeting. Continuing, Mr. Pleggman told the Commission the footprints for the proposed homes will be approximately 1351 square feet, with an additional 1200 feet if the lower level is finished. Mr. Pleggman said if a client decides on the story and one half home 808 square feet can be added. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Pleggman why the smallest lot continues to be located on the corner. She added she recalls at the last Commission meeting the Commission requested that the largest lot be platted on the corner to better afford a greater setback from Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Anderson responded if so desired that can be accomplished. Continuing, Mr. Anderson said it was felt the additional 1 1/2 feet would better benefit the interior lots. Mr. Anderson explained in response to Commissioner McClellands comments on drainage that he is waiting to speak to the City Engineer on drainage options. Mr. Anderson said in his opinion the development will need to be constructed with underground pipes. He said he believes because of the size of the site a drainage pond will not work. Mr. Anderson said in previous conversations with Mr. Hoffman it was suggested to construct a berm along Interlachen Boulevard with a large drainage pipe. Mr. Anderson said the proponent will work with the City Engineer to ensure proper drainage control. Commissioner Byron referred to #4 of staffs recommendations and asked Mr. Larsen what he means by "plans presented". Mr. Larsen said if this proposal is approved his goal is to ensure that the homes constructed on this site match in scale the existing homes in the Brookside Heights neighborhood. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said the footprints presented will be considered final. No variances from setbacks will be allowed. Commissioner Byron said if approved as presented can the Commission be guaranteed that on Lot 1 a rambler will be constructed. Mr. Larsen said that is correct, if approved a one story home (rambler) will be the only housing style that can be constructed on that lot. Commissioner Runyan commented that the 500 foot neighborhood in this instance is varied. Mr. Larsen said he agrees, this site appears to sit at the edge of four different neighborhoods, acknowledging the 500 foot neighborhood analysis does not always answer all questions. Commissioner Workinger asked how far the proposed home on Lot 1 will be from Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Anderson said the home will be at minimum 25 feet from Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, told the Commission from the start this proposal has had problems. He pointed out in the beginning the sign indicating a subdivision would occur was placed in an area on the property difficult to see. The developer has also supplied erroneous information regarding lot calculations, and actions by the Commission were based on wrong numbers. Mr. Miller asked the Commission to deny the request to subdivide. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen to explain for her lot coverage requirements on lots less than 9,000 square feet. Mr. Larsen explained on lots less than 9000 square feet lot coverage cannot exceed 30% or 2,250 square feet whichever comes first. Mr. Leenders, 5317 Hollywood Road, told the Commission he is opposed to the requested subdivision. Mr. Leenders submitted to the Chairman a packet he assembled containing materials and his comments and requested they be read into the record. Attached to the minutes as "Exhibit A". Mr. Robert Tessmann, 5109 Blossom Court, told the Commission he opposes the proposed subdivision and asked the Commission to deny the request of the proponent. Ms. Tostenson, 5137 William Avenue, told the Commission she does not support the construction of small houses on this corner lot. Ms. C. Bisson, 5340 Hollywood Road, submitted to the Commission her written comments and asked them to be read into the minutes. Attached as "Exhibit B". Mr. Don Peterson, 5403 Interlachen Boulevard, told the Commission in his opinion if this request is approved the City would be defenseless in stopping others from subdividing their property. Mr. Wallenkamp, 5332 Hollywood Road, told the Commission water run- off continues to be a problem. He concluded he wants the character of the area to be maintained, and in his opinion this proposal will negatively impact the neighborhood. Ms. Greer, 5109 Bedford Avenue, told the Commission she crosses Interlachen Boulevard at Oxford Avenue and wants that site developed appropriately. She stated she does not believe what is proposed suits the neighborhood. Mr. Pleggman thanked the neighbors for their comments and said he understands their concerns. He explained the driveways for the proposed four homes will be off Oxford Avenue, not Interlachen Boulevard which in his opinion provides safety. He stated drainage will be addressed to ensure proper standards are implemented. Mr. Pleggman said in his opinion the four proposed homes will maintain the character of the neighborhood. Commissioner Runyan said he feels the house proposed to be located on the corner of Oxford and Interlachen should be a rambler style home. He said in his opinion this is a difficult decision because redevelopment of the subject lots needs to occur. Commissioner Runyan stated he believes four homes are too much on this corner, and two homes may be too few. Commissioner Runyan said he cannot support the proposal as presented at four homes. Commissioner Ingwalson told the Commission he recommended approval of a four lot subdivision at the last meeting because he believed minimal or no variances would be required. Commissioner Ingwalson said in light of finding the lot calculations were incorrect he cannot support the proposal, the variances required are too significant. Commissioner Ingwalson acknowledged something needs to be developed at this location, but he is not sure on what is right. Commissioner Swenson stated she grew up on Skyline Drive, and in her opinion four homes are too much at this location and for this 500 foot neighborhood. Commissioner Lonsbury told the Commission for the past three meetings the Commission and neighborhood have listened to much discussion regarding this proposal, right numbers, wrong numbers, not my neighborhood, my neighborhood, etc., and he appreciates all the comments and feelings expressed. Continuing, Commissioner Lonsbury explained to members of the neighborhood the Commission also represents the 45,000 Edina residents not present this evening. Commissioner Lonsbury said this proposal has been difficult for him because he believes redevelopment of this area would be a plus for the neighborhood and community at large, and that the proposed concept is good. Commission Lonsbury added he commends the developer for this concept, but he cannot support four homes on this corner. Concluding, Commissioner Lonsbury said he wishes he could suggest what is right for this site but he can't. Mr. Larsen told the Commission they need to take action on what is before them this evening and more this forward to the Council. Commissioner Swenson moved to the deny the request for a four lot subdivision. Commission Ingwalson seconded the motion. Ayes; Lonsbury, Swenson, McClelland, Ingwalson, Runyan, Workinger, Berman, Johnson. Nay, Byron. Motion to deny carried 8-1. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 P.M. Jackie Hoogenakker