Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-04-29 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Packet
Agenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota VIRTUAL MEETING Me m be rs of the pu blic can participate in on e of the pu blic he arin gs by: • Le avin g a voicem ail at 952-826-0377. • Subm ittin g com m e n ts online at Be tterTogethe rEdin a.org. • Callin g 800-374- 0221 with Confere nce ID 7660588 during the m e eting. An ope rator will place you into a que ue until it is your turn to spe ak. You do not nee d to call until you are re ady to spe ak. Com m ents su bm itted by voicem ail, online or over th e phon e durin g the m e etin g will be e qually considere d. The re is no ne ed for a pe rson to subm it the sam e com m e nts in m ore than on e way. Wednesday, April 29, 2020 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Planning Commission Minutes: April 15, 2020 V.Public Hearings A.Continue public hearing to May 13, 2020. B-20-10, A 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive B.B-20-11, A 1.91 foot 1rst 2oor height variance for a new home at Woodland Circle C.Preliminary Plat with Multiple Variances at 7413 and 7425 York Terrace for Blaz Razul D.Parking Stall Variance and Revised Final Development Plan, 4500 France for Orion Investments VI.Reports/Recommendations VII.Correspondence And Petitions VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Sta< Comments X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampli1c ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: April 29, 2020 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:P lanning C ommission Minutes: April 15, 2020 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: P lease approve the P lanning C ommission Meeting Minutes from April 15, 2020. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Planning Commission Minutes : April 15, 2020 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2020 Page 1 of 5 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission WebEx Meeting April 15, 2020 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Berube, Thorsen, Strauss, Melton, Olsen, Bennett, Agnew, Douglas, and Chair Nemerov. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner, Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist, Scott Denfeld, Video Production Coordinator, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director . Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Velavuli. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the April 15, 2020, agenda. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, March 11, 2020 Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the March 11, 2020, meeting minutes. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Public Hearings A. B-20-6, A 25 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance, a 5 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance, and a Variance from the Basement Definition of a Story – 513 Johns Street Assistant City Planner Aaker presented the request of a 25-foot yard setback variance, a 5-foot side yard setback variance and a variance from the Basement Definition of a Story for 513 Johns Street . Staff recommended approval of the variances, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Greg Graton, Architect for the applicant, addressed the Commission. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2020 Page 2 of 5 Public Hearing There were no comments. Commissioner Berube moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Douglas seconded the motion. Motion carried. Staff answered Commission questions Motion Commissioner Thorson moved that the Planning Commission recommend of the 5 foot side and 25 foot front yard setback variance and a variance from the definition of a basement counted as a “story” for additions to an existing nonconforming home for property at 513 John Street as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. B-20-9, A 19.2 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance for a New 2 Story Home to be Re-Built at the same Nonconforming Setback as the Existing Home – 4505 West 70th Street Assistant City Planner Aaker presented the request of a 19.2-foot front yard setback variance for a new 2 story home to be re-built at the same nonconforming setback as the existing home. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff addressed Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Rebecca Ryan, applicant, introduced herself and addressed the Commission. Public Hearing Ms. Kelly McGlennon, called in and introduced herself. She addressed the Commission. Commissioner Berube moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried. Staff addressed the resident and Commission questions. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 19.2- foot south street setback request for a teardown-rebuild for property located at 4504 West 70th Street as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2020 Page 3 of 5 C. A 170.1 Foot Setback Variance for Crown Castle, USA, Inc. for a Mono-Pole Antenna and Light Standard Replacement – 5200 Doncaster Way/Highlands Park Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request of for a 170.1-foot setback variance for Crown Castle, USA, Inc for a Mono-Pole antenna, and light standard replacement. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff addressed Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Megan Flower, Crown Castle, introduced herself and made a presentation to the Commission. She answered questions from the Commission. Public Hearing No one wished to address the Commission. Commissioner Thorson moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission discussed this item and indicated: If there were health care concerns transmission could be stopped. Benefits of having cell coverage is significant and is needed for coverage No neighbors are opposed Already a tower in this location so no surprise to residents Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 170.1- foot setback to re-install park light standards as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. D. B-20-7, A 2.8 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance for a Garage Addition – 5908 Chowen Avenue Assistant Planner Bodeker presented the request of 2.8-foot side yard setback variance for a garage addition. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff addressed Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2020 Page 4 of 5 Mr. Neil Theison, representing the applicant, addressed the Commission. Public Hearing Ms. Erin Hulbert, 5908 Chowen Avenue, addressed the Commission. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried. Staff addressed Commission questions. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2.8- foot side yard setback variance for a garage addition at 5908 Chowen Avenue as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried 8 ayes, 1 nay (Nemerov). E. Amended Final Development Plan (Site Plan) and Parking Stall Variance – 4532 France Avenue Director Teague presented the amended final development plan (site plan) and parking stall variance at 4532 France Avenue. Staff recommends approval of the amended site plan and variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Jonah Finkelstein, Spack Solutions, made a presentation to the Commission and answered questions. Mr. Casey Carl, applicant, addressed the Commission. Public Hearing No one addressed the Commission. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission discussed the item and indicated: Traffic and safety are less of an issue then in other places in the City No real parking concerns Concerned with pedestrian access Need to think long term regarding parking and walking Real world evidence shows little to no impact Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2020 Page 5 of 5 Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the paring stall variance from 18 stalls to 11 and the amended site plan to allow the remodeling of the lower level 540 square foot storage area for office use as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VI. Reports/Recommendations None VII. Chair and Member Comments Commissioner Miranda reviewed with the Commission the TDM plan that was discussed at a work session with the Transportation Commission, Chair Nemerov and the City Council. Chair Nemerov indicated the work session on April 29, 2020 will need to be rescheduled but was concerned with the number of meetings that may need to be cancelled. VIII. Staff Comments None IX. Adjournment Commissioner Berube moved to adjourn the April 15, 2020, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:24 PM. Commissioner Agnew seconded the motion. Motion carried. Date: April 29, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:C ontinue public hearing to May 13, 2020. B-20-10, A 18.6-foot front yard setback varianc e to the required front yard setback along Mornings ide R oad at 4248 Alden Drive Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as submitted. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he subject property, 4248 Alden D rive, is approximately 9,987 square feet (.23 acres) and is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Alden Drive and Morningside R oad. T he existing home on the lot is a two-story home built in 1914. T he applicant intends to tear down the existing structure and replace it with another two-story home. T his lot is a 50’ x 200’ corner lot that requires two front yard setbacks. T he required front yard setbacks are equal to the existing setbacks for the homes on either side of the subject property along M orningside Road and Alden D rive. T he existing house is setback 10.2 feet on the southside of the lot (along Morningside R oad). T he proposed setback on the southside of the property for the new home is 11.2 feet. With the exception of the front yard setback along M orningside Road, the proposed new home meets all other zoning requirements. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Aerial Map Applicant Submittal Engineering Memo Required Setback Exhibit The subject property, 4248 Alden Drive, is approximately 9,987 square feet (.23 acres) and is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Alden Drive and Morningside Road. The existing home on the lot is a two-story home built in 1914. The applicant intends to tear down the existing structure and replace it with another two-story home. This lot is a 50’ x 200’ corner lot that requires two front yard setbacks. The required front yard setbacks are equal to the existing front yard setbacks for the homes on either side of the subject property along Morningside Road and Alden Drive. The existing house is setback 10.2 feet on the southside of the lot (along Morningside Road). The proposed setback on the southside of the property for the new home is 11.2 feet. The setback to Morningside Road is established by the home to the west, at 4110 Morningside, which has a 29.8-foot front setback. With the exception of the front yard setback along Morningside Road, the proposed new home meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features There is an existing two-story home on the lot oriented towards Alden Drive that was built in 1914. April 29, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-20-10, A 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The engineering department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to relevant ordinance sections and has provided a memo. The site drains to private property, Morningside Road, and Alden Drive then ultimately to Weber pond. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Side yard East Side – Front yard South – Front yard West Side – Rear yard 5 feet 42 feet 29.8 feet side 25 feet 6.8 feet 63.7 feet 11.2 feet* Roughly 50 feet Building Coverage 25% 24.2% *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1. Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. STAFF REPORT Page 3 The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning standards with the exception of the required front yard setback along Morningside Road. The lot has two required front yard setbacks which greatly affect the buildable area within the required setbacks due to the narrow lot. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the home to the west, 4110 Morningside, which has a front setback of 29.8 feet. The front yard setback for the subject property is established by the location of that home. With a 29.8-foot setback to Morningside, and a 5-foot setback to the north lot line, there would only be a 15-foot buildable area for this lot. No reasonable sized home could be built on this lot that meets all the required setbacks. The proposed home is reasonably sized for the neighborhood and would be setback further from Morningside than the existing home. 2. There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances are unique to the subject property and are not self-created. The width of the lot and the limitations of the required setbacks are not common to every similarly zoned property. 3. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The proposed front yard setback is similar to the existing setback of the new home. The proposed project complies with the other zoning requirements. Recommended Action: Approve an 18.6-foot front yard setback variance to the required front yard setback along Morningside Road at 4248 Alden Drive. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the home to the west, which has a front setback of 29.8 feet. The front yard setback for the subject property is established by the location of that home. 2. With a 29.8-foot setback to Morningside, and a 5-foot setback to the north lot line, there would be a 15.2-foot buildable area for this lot. No reasonable sized home could be built on this lot that meets all the required setbacks. 3. The proposed home is reasonably sized for the neighborhood and would be setback further from Morningside than the existing home. 4. Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey date stamped March 10, 2020. STAFF REPORT Page 4 2. Elevations and plans date stamped March 10, 2020. 3. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the engineering variance review memo dated March 20, 2020. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 4248 Alden Drive April 16, 2020 1 in = 50 f t / 20 EXISTING CONDITION SURVEY FOR: C. ALAN HOMES LEGEND Fence Stone Retaining Wall • Sanitary Manhole O Storm Manhole ExisUng Contour • Set Rog Soil • Found Iron Monument • Polo and ‘1811r ?gin 14245 ILINN DR. FROM OfI90-916.0 PESO 1113017.943.6 914.1 9 43.0 914.1 a, x916.5 0917.0 b CD 14248 &DEN DR. FRONT onwo.917.6 PEAK 14901ff.9321.2 7 91 x915.2 011) LL 0 z 0 --J PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA 10 0 10 20 Pi 9, W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING. INC. 8030 CEDAR AVENUE ...SURE 228. 8L00MINOT014, MN 55425 Bus: (952) 8544055 FAS: 0352.18544268 EMAIL:INFORWBROWNLANDSURVEYING.COM SITE ADDRESS 4.48 Alden Dr. Edina. MN 55016 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 50 feet of Lot 65. MORNINOSIDE, Hennepin Coen ..Prinowom. BENCHMARK T N H not& south side of 3lomingsWe Rd. wit of Aldan Dr. Elevation =909.37. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by nie or under my direct supervision and that I am o duly registered Land Surveyor under the low of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DATED: 02-20-2020 WOOOROW A. BROWN. 9.1.5. MN REG 15230 REVISIONS JOB NO. 5CALE 22-20 DRAWN CME BOOK/PAGE 166/25 REFERENCE SHEET 1 of 1 WALL PRLAR 13.1 x914.5 00' .0 915.3 LLLLLLLLL LLLI_LL.L.LL 0915.2 LLL 1:1614311 RA110-1 LLLLL LLLLL LLLLL LLLtIx 0515.4 LX915.5_1_LL_ LLLLLLLLLLLLL LLULLLL LT.b...LLLL x915.4 LrECLL x914.7 x905.2 971.0 909.7 915. x x915.4 U. tit 01118.8 x915.5 so 815.8 913 15.5 09.9 JOT COVFRAGF• Lot Area = 9,987 SF , 915.1 x916.6 0916.5 0. A 6Z 915{ OO 915.7 0915.0 NORM UNE OF INE SOLON 5 K k O , F , LOT 65 916.5 0016.4 0915.2 162 0288.4 0 Sx.,• x916.4 T L. LI I 1.7,* ,-11 918.0111 09169 !!--1 9160 916.0 918.3 GARAGE F20011.916.3 x918.4 0914.2 S89'47'13"E 199 915.n 0917.0 15.7 0916.3 0915.5 -ON .0 918. IRV BOXES 61 -I 9916.3 I ! 14111 MORNINGSIOF Ira. FRONT E4110,217.5 GARAGE /1.0013.1115.5 915 0915.3 X916.5 x915.8 p l p ,.r x915.3 LC9 X9 911.2 .919.9 COVERAGE: House = 851 SF Detoched Garage = 368 SF Shed = 103 SF Paver P000 = 107 SF ALLOWANCES: Pallo = -107 SF Total = tdii SF 255 Madman, 00000519 Lot Coverage IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- Lat Area = 9,987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: House = 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed x• 103 SF Paver Pallo Iv/ Slops - 115 SF Paver Walk = 238 SF Concrete Walk 45 SF Driveway 11 Garage Apron - 791 SF Total i. 5 5 . 1 1 1 SF 50% Moximum Allowable Lot Cowroge N0 -All exieting building dimensions ore measured to the finished siding and not the building foundation. -No *earth was made for any easements. -The location o all utiilles 91101V0 0 e from either Observed evidence in th field and/or from plans furnished by the utility companies and ala approximate. Utility companies should be notified for exact location before doing any excovation. 912 911,510 9 1.5TC MORNINGSIDE ROAD qqI ion 4914.3 M114.3 0814.3 x914.0 9913.7 0914.5 91 6(0 1IW 4.5 915.8 1111E 0 ,, 91 12.2 914.4 914 913.4 913 , • SET 24.0 HMI ON NET 6 • 915.6. 7 C.,VDS AY 91 915.2 0. Tl 900.9 3 0,74111i SAN N.H. TOP-910.80 INVERT 1959.4 IV SCALE IN FEET REPAR CURB LTR MORNINGSIDE ROAD SHAD 1,111. 0 TDP-910A3 CM U.H. TOP.910.60 INVERT-666.4 x 916 4 0914.3 x914.3 3.1 10 10 20 SCALE IN FEET z 0 501 PROPOSED SITE PLAN FOR: C. ALAN HOMES LEGEND Fence Stone Retaining Wall C Sanitory Monhole O Storm Manhole ErisUng Contour • Set Wag Nab • Found Iron Monument • ine:cAifla ItarTg230 Proposed Contour 0(900.0) Proposed Elevation Proposed Retaining Wall 20 14246 5904 DR. FROM DMW-916.0 PEAS 1699117.943.6 914.1 gyAr 914.1 421 felts moliraNGSOE RD. FROM EriffRY=917.5 GARAGE FLOOR-9155 A /.//E 915.7 GRAC - Lny Boy, 48 1 x916.3 25277 8. 5 ir916.4 916 •16.6 */ EX15CrniED /4, -51 SIDE s'el 91.9 -.LP.- „G,. //...Ica// • • 916.6 (914.6)0 , 0916.4 9 6.3 916.0 0, 913.4 913- - FXISTING Fl TVATIONS- Front Peak ra'itj,, = -9 ;i6.z MMM HG IDT OINFRABF. Lot Area = 9.987 SF COVERAGE, Noose = 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed - 103 SF Paver Patio w 107 SF ALLOWANCES: Patio = -107 SF Total 1631i SF 250 Maximum Allowiable Lot Coverage FX15101f1 IMPERMMIS MIRFAITi Lot Area = 9.987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: House w 851 SF Detached Garage = 368 SF Shed = 103 SF Favor Patio re/ Steps = 115 SF Paver Walk = 238 SF Control* Walk = 45 SF Driveway & Garage Apron = 791 SF Total i. 5 5 . 1 SF 50% Maximum Allowable Lot Coverage MitipOSFO I OT COW. Lot Area 9,987 SF COVERAGE: Room < 2,366 SF Polio - 198 SF Demo Dieting Shed - 0 SF ALLOWANCES: Patio ie -ISO SF Thth1 i'44.2i SF 2.51 or 2,496 SF Maximum Allowable Lot Coveroav PROPOSED IMPERVMUS SURFA/Wi Lot Area - 9,987 SF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Room = 2,366 SF Stoop 4. 42 SF Patio = 196 SF Wolk = 56 SF Driveway - 1,138 SF Dorm Dieting Shed - 0 SF Total = gati SF 500 or 4,993 SF Ifindmum Nlowablo Lot Covisrogo Pi E MI a:Eating MT beading ""° to the tin jet"° siding and not N e dimension. -No search was made for any easements. -The Mcolion o oll utilities shown are from either observed evidence in th field and/or from plans furnished by the utility componies and ore approximate. Utility companies ohouid ba notified for exact locotMn before doing any excavation. 915 915 - -.' 141 2 916.9 os%9 (914.3) 1" IF 2 91", 914.48 914- . . SET RAG NAA fitl. BET St DIRECT PORTION OF RUNI4OFF B TO CATO_ MW -S89.47 13 E 199=72-MEA: 63111211 x914.3 x914.5 IRETNNING IOU (Da,K91 Eff 0114:125) FETNMIG WALL PRIM (814.13)1 g 9(914.2) 915 91 . -X-(913.7) 'x915.3 8irow.> CAM CUT 4241 NIDI OR. FROP05617 ROAM PHI ERST FLOM PLAN FRET FICI7417(1116.10) 113P OF FNO:4910.41) WAAGE FLOOR-01007 8 FLOOrt=i077.713) THE70141W(M&M) TO MST FITG•=1.0C4T ELEW11049,$.-.416 f PRIOR TO COISTRUCTION. INSTAL STOMA SEVER INLET PROTECTION ON AU_ CATOI 1149N9 070933 TO CONSTRUCTION SEMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA x9I5.5 .915.6 \KIM UNE Of THE SOUTH OF LOT 65 N PERFOPUTED PVC MILE IN ROCK BED 914.2 4.2 .914.0 REVISIONS DRAWN CME REFERENCE A013 NO. 22-20A BOOK/PAGE 166/25 SHEET 1 of 1 SITE ADDRESS 4248 Alden Dr. Edina. MIN 55416 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The South 50 feet of Lot 65, MORN1NOSIOE, Hennepin County. Mennesota. BENCHMARK T N H on the south aide of Morningside Rd. east of Alden Dr. Elevation = 909.37. I hereby certify that this survey. plow or report wos prepared by me or under my direct super-Webs: and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the taws of the State of Minnesota. W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. DATED) 03.04.2020 W000ROW A. BROWN. R.L.S. MN REG 13230 W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 6030 CEDAR BMWs ...SUBS 228. 81.00/411.1070/1, MN 55425 Bus: (052)1354.405.5 FAx:(052)1354.4268 EMAIL: INFOOWBROWNLANDSURVE,NG.coM SCALE 1 =10 GOPHERSTATEONECALLORG 1600)252-1166 TOLL FREE (651)454-0002 LOCAL NORTH UNE OF THE SOUTH OF LOT 65 lfrf POSES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. INSTALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS EXPOSED TO CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT MORNINGSIDE ROAD 10 0 10 20 SCALE IFI FEET PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA DATE REVISION 23460 P.E. NAME DATE: 03/04/2020 DRAWING: \ sener \ Projects \ 2020 \ #20-516 4240 Alden Dr.. Edina (C-Alan Hornes)\2020-03-02\20516c10.dwg LAYOUT: C1 #20-516 jm XREF: siteplan / (Sunder Engineering, PLLC. MOW CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 10830 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 19521 881.3344 TELEPHONE 19521881-1913 FAX wove sundeciol corn 4248 ALDEN DRIVE EDINA, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INNESOTA. lt.n4/A0-0 INFORMATION: PROJECT NO: 020.516 DRAWN BY: lm CHECKED BY: as APPROVED BY: bhm graphic 03/002020 DESCRIPTION. STORM/ATER MANAGEMENT PLAN SHEET NO: C1 1 of 3 SILTFENCE DIRECT PORTION OF ROOF RUNNOFF TO CATCH BASIN 4'74 OD -131TU7r1rXr_A-11-dr- _13240.44 NIEN SOUL SCALE: DATE: EDINA SITE DRAINAGE PRECAUTIONS: 1. Reduce soil compaction by limiting equipment access to specific construction paths, if applicable. 2. Loosen compacted soils through raking, tinning, tilling, or other methods to a minimum depth of 6 inches. 3. Place new, organic rich, topsoil to a minimum depth of 4 inches on areas of disturbance. 4. Place sod or seed and mulch on exposed soils as soon as practical. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stokes, signs, silt fence, etc.) on the development site before work begins. 2. Avoid removal of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest practical area of soil at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. 3. Following initial soil disturbance or redisturbance, complete permanent or temporary stabilization against erosion due to rain, wind, and running water as soon as possible, but in no case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including stormwoter management pond sideslopes. This requirement does not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on which grading, site building, or other construction activities are actively underway. 4. Provide temporary grass seed cover on all topsoil stockpiles and other areas of stockpiled excavated material in order to prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged periods of open, bare earth without grass cover will not be permitted. Stabilize all disturbed greenspace areas with a minimum of 4" topsoil immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and mulch, or sod and stake these areas within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS: CURT BREKKE C-ALAN HOMES 5215 TERRACEVIEW LANE NORTH, PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 PHONE: (612) 282-7546 EMAIL: curtb19720gmail.com Existing boundary, location, topographic, and utility information shown on this plan is from a field survey by W. Brown Land Surveying, Inc. dated 02-20-2020. The Engineer is not responsible for inaccuracies related to the survey information. KEY PROPOSED RUNOFF FLOW DIRECTION EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR (895.9) PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 1 Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stokes, signs, silt fence, etc.) before work begins. 2 Establish sediment control practices on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 3 Install all perimeter sediment control devices and construction entrances. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be installed before the next precipitation event even if the short-term activity is not complete. 4 Contact the City for approval of the sediment control devices. 5 Rough grade the site. 6 Install utilities. 7 Install pavements. 8 Install lawn and landscape. 9 Restore oil disturbed areas. 10 Clean all storm sewer and conveyance systems. 11 After all disturbed areas are stabilized, obtain approval from the City and/or Watershed District. 12 Remove all temporary sediment control devices. TOTAL LOT AREA = 9,987 SO. FT. EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2,512 SQ. FT. PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 4,892 SQ. FT. NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA TO PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY = 2,846 SQ. FT. NET DECREASE IN IMPERVIOUS AREA TO PRIVATE PROPERTY = 466 SQ. FT. City of Edina Storm Water Reauirements: In the City of Edina, construction of a new dwelling unit requires a storm water management plan meeting the Category 2 criteria. No increase in peak runoff rotes to private properties for the 10% annual probability rainfall event (NOM Atlast 14, 10-year) is allowed. 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be paved using early application of gravel base. 6. Apply necessary moisture to the construction area in order to prevent the spread of dust. 7. In areas to be permanently stabilized, landscape with decorative rock, plantings, and sod. Refer to the approved Landscape Plan for design and details. 8. The street will be swept clean before the end of each day of active construction, when sediment is tracked into the street. 9. Areas with slopes greater than 3 to 1 and areas next to wetlands/waterbodies graded or exposed during construction shall be protected with temporary vegetation, mulching or other means as soon as practical. 10. No concrete washout shall occur on site unless it is done with an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) device or standard. 11. Stockpiles shall be surrounded with adequate perimeter control to prevent sedimentation and erosion. 12. Site shall be kept clean at all times and refuse properly controlled. 13. Temporary pumping shall not be permitted without the use of an approved Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) device or standard. 14. The contractor shall inspect on a weekly basis and after any rainfall greater than 0.5' oll erosion control devices and make any repairs immediately. An inspection log shall be kept on site detailing these inspections and repairs preformed. RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) N RET YOU. ISILTFENCE CLEANOUT INV. = 902.31 1 TOP = 913.20 INV. = 910.20 ST. S. POP UP -Il same •er 3 'mu 64` b DIA. PERFORATED PVC- u uuuu DRAINTILE IN ROCK BED -EStsIEB-spdrr s£1131(6%- 1 16 LF 6" DRAINT1LE 0 5.0oz FOUNDATION UNE ?AM EP AEE F)R Mm J a 5.0 13- CONC . STOOP _IS 50 1 1 M ice/ 6" DIA. PERFORATED PVC DRAINTILE IN ROCK BED ROOF DRAIN JO/ = 912.9 RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) BUILDER TO VERWY PROPOSED FLOOR ELEVATIONS • FIRST ROOR=(918.10) TOP OF Rio. (916.41) BASENENT 8000.(907.70) PEN( HEIGHT=(945.58) 4248 ALDEN DR. PROPOSED HOUSE PER FIRST FLOOR PUN 91 912 B . eon? OUT VaIDON 4 LLLLLLL LLLLLLL LLL 'LLLLLLL LLLILLLLL LLL z LI .LLLLL LLLLLLL L FRONT XTEXX 2-.9 ,_LLLLLL t LL0 LLLLL I 1 ! ! 1 ! 'I LLL LLL _LLL LLL LLL L LL),11_L L L LLC1, . LL L LLL _i_L , pRPOSEDL DRNENAY /CELL LLL .L I IIILL LLLLLI LLL LLI_LLL_Lo_LLLI 6'1 LLLLLL 41, LLLLLL• _LLLLLL LLLLLLL LL LLL _LLLLLL LLLLLLL LL LL _LLLLLL LLLLLLLL,I_LL L _LLLLLL LLLLLLLL,LLL - - - /PROPOSED% 1.STOCKPILE %LO N z LU D GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ----- 50' GENERAL NOTES 1. USE HANCOR HENRY DUTY CORRUGATED PIPE. OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. USE MIRAFI 140N GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC. OR APPROVED EQUAL 3. SELECT GRANULAR ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE A CLEAN, MEDIUM GRAINED, UNIFIED SOIL CLASIFICATION SYSTEM (USCS) OSTIA D2487) SP SAND MEETING THE FOLLOWING GRADATION REQUIREMENTS: SIFVE SIZF 75 mm (3 finch) 4.75 mm (No. 4) 0.425 mm (No. 40) 0.075 mm (No. 200) 4. COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE SHALL BE A FREE DRAINING MINERAL PRODUCT, FOCI UDING CRUSHED CARBONATE QUARRY ROCK, LIMESTONE, CRUSHED CONCRETE, AND SALVAGED BITUMINOUS MIXTURE. z PASSING 100 75-100 0-40 0-5 / / 18' 6' COVER STONE 6' TUBING 6' STONE BED SELECT GRANULAR FILL DEPTH VARIES GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 6' MIN. OVERLAP COARSE FILTER AGGREGATE. USE IGNEOUS ROCK, OR SIMILAR INSOLUBLE, DURABLE, AND DECAY-RESISTANT MATERIAL BETWEEN THREE-FOURTHS INCH AND 2-1/2 INCHES IN SIZE, WITH NO MORE THAN FIVE PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING A THREE-FOURTHS INCH SIEVE AND NO MORE THAN ONE PERCENT BY WEIGHT PASSING A NO. 200 SIEVE. MATERIALS GREATER THAN 2-1/2 INCHES IN SIZE SHALL NOT EXCEED FIVE PERCENT BY WEIGHT. 6' DIAMETER PERFORATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PVC (ASTM D2729) OR CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PE (ASTM F405) DRAINTILE 0 12 FOOT MINIMUM WIDTH MNDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE V PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MATERIAL BENEATH THE ROCK iteplon /20-516 3m DRAWING: \\server \ ProjedA2020V20-516 4248 Alden Er., Edina (C-Man Hornes)\2020-03-02 20516c10.d wg LAYOUT: C3 XREF: DATE REVISION 23468 P.E NAME DATE: 03/04/2020 DATE: 03/04/2020 L / (S u n d e\ Engineering, PLLC. CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 10830 NESBITT AVENUE SOUTH BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 (952) 881-3344 TELEPHONE 1952) 881-1913 FAX WNW sundecivil corn 4248 ALDEN DRIVE EDINA, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT IAM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INNESOTA. tio41/4.) odistat INFORMATION: PROJECT NO.: 820-516 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: ss APPROVED BY: bhrn SCALE: graphic DESCRIPHON: DETAILS SHEET NO: C3 3af3 24—INCH HIGH CUT—OFF DIKE WITH MAXIMUM SIDESLOPES OF 4:1 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 6 INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS PUBLIC R -140 00 00 0 ► 0 0 0 00 00 0 00 0 111. 30 FOOT MINIMUM LENGTH 0 00 00 00 0 00 009)0 0 00 00 00 is• • 00 (DO (DO o (DO 00 00 00 0 00 00 o0 b0 ti 4() 00 cp 00 0 4%00 (DO 00 00 (D 0 0000000000 00 00 00 00 0 00 00 00 0 • 04: 1 TO 2 INCH DIAMETER WASHED ROCK, MN DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3137 CA-1, CA-2, CA-3 OR EQUAL COARSE AGGREGATE 411. o 0 00 o PROPOSED GRADE 4' TOPSOIL DRAINTILE 2 INCH SQUARE HARDWOOD, PINE, OR STANDARD T- OR U-SECTION STEEL POSTS. DO NOT EXCEED MAXIMUM POST SPACING OF 4 FT. O.C. FABRIC COLOR SHALL BE INTERNATIONAL ORANGE PERSPECTIVE VIEW GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT STD. SPEC. 3886 FOR SELF SUPPORTING SILT FENCE JOIN SECTIONS L 1E WRAP POSTS AND TIE TOGETHER 30" MIN. HEIGHT DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW LAY THE FABRIC AGAINST THE SIDES AND BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH. BACKFILL AND COMPACT WITH A VIBRATORY PLATE COMPACTOR ANCHOR FABRIC IN SOIL USE LATH AND STAPLES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POSTS. USE TIE WIRES TO ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POSTS. USE HOG RINGS TO ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH SECTION VIEW ANCHOR SUPPORT POST IN SOIL REINFORCE WITH SNOW FENCE, WIRE MESH, OR STIFF PLASTIC FENCE IN AREAS WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOWS OCCUR (SUCH AS SWALES, DITCHES, AND IN FRONT OF CULVERTS AND CATCHBASINS) SILT FENCE INSTALLATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA esigned living C.stom Designed liomes, Add;tien, .nd gernodd. 5teven K.V=,pnskd DESIGNER Alinn..,ra 55)72 <J5.'2-270-2757 asvcssa,:ntegra.nct IE. E/12 maxi" fLOCI9 1 7712-1-- 1 1 1 111)11111 I I .---..a.-. =cA.10--a:M......-....m......-ai SI W ME OM Err _riginir- NaNit CCNC. 5T E.6 POST IRTTED 6. NARDI TRIM TO Irst2. IV Is CEDAR 71.4Roksurri 00 0rINIIIMILJUIUMNI. 111MUUNIMMOMINIMU. IIIIMMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMM. almIuMIKILVAITPUIUNUI UUMOSOIllidailidOONI IIIIIIIMMUMMEMI II IMEINOMMINIMMUMNI it • AVERIVIli emomomomomo 12 TRIM rt slinompom 12712 NOTE: VERIFY SIZE OF LIGHT FDOURE 1011 TRIM PLATES OATH IMAM MOWER CEDAR rirs ext1"42.. (10 TOTAL) NOTE ALL LAP SIP1.6 TO BE 5' EXPOSURE PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2C,2O CITY OF EDINA 0 ISASEVIENr FLOOR LINE GENERAL NOTES: I. ALL DOOR AND WINDOW HEADERS TO BE S.P.F. #2 OR SETTER, SEE PLANS FOR SIZES. 2. HOUSE TO BE BUILT PER CURRENT I.R.C. CODES. 3. VERIFY GRADES AND ADJUST FOUNDATION/FOOTING STEPS AS NEEDED. 4. SEE PLANS FOR CEILING HEIGHTS 5. FOUNDATION WALLS PER PLAN 6. FLOOR PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FRAMING AND FACE OF FOUNDATION INSULATION(2" RIGID) 7. 1/2"' 0.S.8. SHEATHING AT ALL AREAS TO RECIEVE SHAKES AND AT OPEN GABLES. B. ALL TRADES t SUPPLIERS TO REVIEW It VERIFY INFORMATION PERTINENT TO THEIR WORK AND NOTIFY DESIGNED LIVING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 9. ALL CONCRETE FOOTINGS TO BE 5000 PSI CONCRETE MN. BASEMENT: 1,400 SQ. FT. GROSS 1,150 SQ. FT. FINISHED 91 -0" POURED FDN. FIRST FLOOR: 1,445 SQ. FT. 101 -0" CEILING " FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR: 1,13& SQ. FT, 5'-0" CEILING SECOND FLOOR CEDAR GABLE ELEMENTS r THICK - (3 TOTAL) "V 411, An: 44I IgfliN h.. AIM, AM, VININIUMUNII. VN_RiAiggIIIIIIII -111IIIII-MIIIIIII. • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM, 1% NIIIIIIIIIIIIMIUM ,INgig 1L IIIIIIIIIIIIMINI. `MIIITIIIIIMUllih, =0„ Nili.IIIIIIMINIM IIIIIMUUMIMINI11. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIISJ, Nammommi. mamma ma. Nisimmissis. 11111111111111111%, 1... V ll IM III1 Il il 1111 IN NU III MI 1.111110111•10.11 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII INIIIIMMINIONI KIIIIIIIUMIIIIIM FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/411 = 11 -0' 5/12 \EMT FLOOR LICE 1R11 r-o- C.ANT 12. TRH 5' 0' 2/12 134111114.711131DIM 2,0" CANT MI n 1 IL IMO 2112 J2/1 12 z TOTAL FINISHED SQ. FT,. 4,334 SQ. FT, '12/12 12/12 1-148D1-LAp qiDmr, I. MARDfrt-AP-91DING I 1, 8/12 "Jr S ROOR Lrft,_ r PROJ. It 19-033 Beechler _ _ ________ _ START DATE 2-12-20 T4PAVERPATID DRAWN BY: DAYLIGHT AMA TELL Ult MOWS. FER PLAN CONTACT: APPROVED: X-X-20 EGRESS AREA WELL LW LOU FER L NOTE: ALL LAP EDIY3 TO BE 5" EXPOSURE REVISIONS: 2-26-20 3-5-20 X X BASMENT ROOK LIE, These documents are owned by Designed Living, no. and reserves ALL rights. These plans may not be re-used, cooled or assigned to another party nor shall they be modified or used In pad In other desgns without the prior written consent of Designed Living, In. REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' = 11 -011 SHEET 1 0F 6 12/12 12 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = L 5 • AI\ l'-0" CANT 2'-0. St-rvelp 00IF Ii • --.1-LAP-611) I \ A Al Am, Aposimpow k, I lmikk IIIIIIL IIIIIIIIII. N•••• I I I I ) 6 i It. Nillib'w _ I ll dtb, I 4 41211111111•1i16141111•11ii.' Ifign• .4•1111•••••••••••••••\ aminiololionlinnam•a•miliNento•UM•samlanoluisni 12/12 AMY I ou II II II -o T-0" CANT I ow • — n 11 PAYEEPATIO FIRAT FL Lke estgned ruing Custom Designed homes, Additions and Rc modds 5toven R. Vespested DCSIGNLR Nor Lake, Minnesota 5,372 cei .952-270-2797 es ~vategre.n<t PROJ. 19-033 Beadier START DATE 2-12-20 DRAWN BY: CONTACT: APPROVED: X-X-20 REVISION& 2-26-20 3-5-20 X X SHEET 2 °F 6 I [AKA LAP COM Jr-▪ $7 DUL ISLAND CV RUSH 0.14 22,0° 2,0' 45'.0° 14,0° 11,10' 1-8 estgned -2 V2 ,3,8 112. 9,3 13,111/1" 8,-4112" l'-512' 359 t 3511 3-3511 3211 355 111:,= 1.3119 lying 4 I 2-240 12-240 LOU MIS. 1 104,V9. 2-200 0 0 0 2-2x10 6 2868 _ OVENS Custom Designed Mom,' Adchtions and Remodel,. 5rovee K Vespestcd DESIGNER r,iorbke,Minnesoto 53)72 cel L.,2-270-2797 ssvessSintegra.net erse DROP ZOE 2880 FKT 28807sKT lt2 BUTLER'S PANTRY TILE ICY CEILING coCKTCP UV 140C9 NOTE: STRUCTURAL BEAMS AND HEADERS ARE TEMP. ACTUAL SIZES STILL TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS t'll.11:4200H TILE 10' CEILING KITCHEN f:: 10' CEIL woo ING 155 SF. A 3G r 51 I4'x14' PATIO STAMPED CONC. DINING WOOD 101 CEILING / 2-2019 3068 WIL 845.11. EDGE CP BONDS SPACE 2650 LS. • INDICATES LOCATION OF SOLID ERG. O \ / C4-14,51 / \ L ) NOR 0 TILE INDICATES LOCATION OF BRACED WALL PANELS SEE DETAIL, LAST PAGE MORE 11FORMATION tr.6. 1,0" § 2 L 3211 5911 FIXED 3211 26em 3'-9 I/2. NOTE, 2x6 EXTERIOR WALLS UND. 2#4 INTERIOR WALLS SILO. JI 108 S.F. 2 CAR GARAGE 4" CONC. FLOOR W/ BONUS ROOM TRUSSES 4'-10 1/2. 0 2- II 1B" LVL f ir 9.8 MISSES AT 19.2" OC. 5 <15" FLR TRESSES AT 132" 00. R-008 GIRDER TRIES r 210 SF. 3 SEASON PORCH U.1000 10' CEILING I 4 2-2880 FKT FILL LITE PLAYROOM CARPET 10' CEILING EDGE OF 130418 SPACE 4 GREAT ROOM WOOD kV CEILING FOYER WOOD 12" 14. EOX VAULT g 2,6 L 13.-0. C AT2/,- • lEATER 5 \> 3080 1. Tn 2-240 FLOOR GIRDER IRISS 6 .-6. mMt 35 STAIRS Zu CARPET SI_ 18 SF. STOOP 2400 CONC. 0,6°. 2-3265 SECTION - 13 1%) 2-240 5' N BULT445 2-149 5' 14 BOLT-PIS 2-2010 \ oa5 PP. / en 2,1 1/2 ,1 U2. 5,-3. 2-32 FIXED /0-4 Q 4159 FIXED-TEPP 1.0' CANT. 10n 6. 6,0° 5535 3535 FIXED 3,6. IXED 9,9 3,6° 4,5° 19,6° V-6. 5,0° 2 ,0° 22 ,0° 28'-0° 20,0° I4'-0° 6 24,0° 1,448 SQ. FT. 10.-0" CEILING ID FIRST FLOOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/4' = 1'-011 PLANNING D PARTMENT 24,0° 22,0 2,0. 9'-4• 2'-10" 24 ,0° _L r MAR 1 0 2020 EdRESFAIMAILELL- 7 DAYLIGHT AREA CELL I TA I I:1 4'-0' 1'-4• 2-'1341- 41- 4'1- 41 - - - lafiG0 t.511L. - I 2-2a10 I lxlo 2-5th LEDGE- CITY OF 7 POFD 11011.,_ c4.4 2050" COC.FT6H, - 7 -- 4 L uE rirF 48'434 ro I4,2° L NOTE: STRUCTURAL BEAMS AND HEADERS ARE TEMP. ACTUAL SIZES STILL To BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS 1 L _ 5,4° TI BTR LE BEDROOM CARPET 5'-0' Ty 'BATH *4 TILE 4- RET 4 FOOL TABLE AREA CARPET • INDICATES LOCATION OF SOLID ERG. 52 SD 3,6° FAD WALL UV RENF. FER 0,O1FEERS REPORT CN 20'50° CONE. Fla I4'-0• I/2. CONC. FLOOR 13,10" COLS,* < FLR TRUSSES 2x6 - IS° OZ. ON AT 32"t 6N6.' CC:NC. BLK ON 2043 Pra 1.... , 3-2,0 35I844 s o COO UNEXCAVATED 00 606 POST ON 21'548" cont. PIERS 204 - 16° OZ. ON 4.56" CONC. ELK As Chi 2008 FTG. LATERAL ERACI14 DEVICE - LOCATIONS tULFE, -5.O.I OUIREDDTT FASTENNGIZ OR MAL) PER MAN.FAC11tRER (8 FAMILY ROOM CARPET N*--2" RIGID 51St. — I F SECRET , I I Rom-- 1.1.00R GIRDER PROD. # 19-033 13ae188r MECHANICAL / STORAGE CONC. 950' POURED BALL II/ KEW. PER ENGPEERS REPORT ON 2078. CO/4CM. INSILATE AND SIZEIROCK BEFORE GAS PP. NSTALL WINE RT*1 TILE to- START DATE 2-12-20 To NSLATE TO R-38 Mk 1/2° AC. 51.11.0 SOFFIT HATER. TO BOIT CF /ST O DRAWN BY: 19,0° 5,9. I 6' 6° CONTACT: 3,11. 3,11' 3 SEASON PORCH ABOVE ( 3,812 FLUS44 El 1 9 ‘- APPROVED: X-X-20 0" FCURED111414 ON 20,46. CCNC. preTN, N. I To `111•1111MM STA RS CARPET DULT-515 -N./BUILT-NS J REVISIONS: \ GAS PP. / - 2,R100-1443-.- - - 2-26-20 EDGE FILL 8" P0/RED CN 6.#13" act:c Fta , 3-5-20 RGIp NW. 1 X F- .T.tir_C6titT_E OEFIR_LAgar.7, X 2,0. CANT. 22,6. 2' 19,6° 14'-or 28,0° 24,6. 6 A- 12'-0° Yt 1,400 SQ. FT. GROSS 11,150 SQ. FT. FINISHED 9c0" POURED FDN. SHEET 3 OF 6 These documenls are owned by Designed Living, Inc. and reserves ALL rights. These plans may not be re-used, copied or assigned to another party nor shall they be modified or used in part In other designs without the prior written consent of Designed Living, Inc. E3ASEMENT / FOLN,ATION PLAN SCALE: = 11 -0' 3.- • 'V- ' 9, • 10 ,10' S'.. ' V- ' -e, 32 . ® „.„ 3 35 2-3595 32 1 2- W 111 g 5 ri II • 2- 10 I — T, I5,6. c,. 240 2-9 yr LVL tr-b• ( \ (1-1_,dj0 ,-o* 2-9 V2 LVL 13-0. --i- 7 0, L-- -1 El " ATTIC 1 ''s- Er BEDROOM IS BEDROOM °,1. 2 • cAra-ti . CARPET IT ,,, Q 0 I MASTER BEDROOM 2L4e&tl .1t2t" R A 6a-00 CARPET 1 1 ._ 1 2468 11.14.130X vAULT 6, BY LITE LEDGE 4 :#. it 0 2468 FIGT BATH *2 2468 PET ap [ J - TILE 24663 60. van_ 2 48" vAN. 13 ' 3 2-2668 ILE BATH *3 LS II' 2668 (;) ci) 2668 . 2466 TILE \ J 0 -I -F 1 I 2 2668 Oil *2 . . 24,24' LINEN I 0 Oc°62 HALLWAY -613E2 tri 1 ,,t0) 0 CARPET 6 _EOSD I CARPET '', to 2868 Ur, WALL 2668 :I DO 4 0 ----k- -. '+i i '=i= 4' -0 2468 I 23613 PKT , r- R 1_14 2-2068 ---1 r Fl g LIEN I ,.. _ 24691.KT I u$ I ri id 5 SFELvE i .[ E Ld_I 1 2 4 BATH A a STUDY LOFT CARPET rp_Rm,_iLAutr,,,,,DERyg 3t6' IV S'' i TILE 19,0' ,., I 0 6,2"// L i [, 9 W.I.G. CT A-1 A. i 4' ATTIC -41. '''S o 24.6 1 CARPET 7 / sr, .. ,. - -1-1 1 wealgra , _I 1,4' STAIRS 9,10' " i nu . 9,8. , 2-2x CARPET 2-2x10 , 'L_- 2-7A0 ---' 1.,:l I RAT CLC. PLAT I I— 26-1 i0' = , / FLAT CLG. H I :EMF, -CV.N 74_ SLOPED Eg.Ths358_,_ACLG. CLC. 3241 3241 I I -- — ATTIC SPACE in _ = —u —H L_ 2.2.,, , E ,LTooR _m„3 _—_, t0' 12525 4,7 4,8° 10,0' V-4. ir-10' ,6 6,6" i 28,0. 20.-0. 24.-0. 12-0. 1,136 SQ. FT. 6' -0" CEILING 0 SECOND FLOOR SEcoNr, FLOOR PLAN SCALE. 1/4" = NOTE: STRUCTURAL5EAMS AND HEADERS ARE TEMP. ACTUAL SIZES STILL TO BE DETERMINED BY OTHERS 17- "-- INDICATES LOCATION OP BRACED WALL PANELS SEE DETAIL, LAST PAGE MORE bf-CARMATION II INDICATES LOCATION OP SOLID ERG. 12 / 12 RAT CLG. SLOPED CLC T-0 CANT 12 / 12 5 / 12 5 / 12 ATTIC IF 12 / 12 12 / 12 12 / 12 5 / 12 12 / 12 ATTIC T 12 / 12 12 / 12 12 / 12 9 12" FL BOX VALI UP LITE LEDGE 2,6° 11,0' 5 / 12 L _ 12 / 12 ATTIC SPACE I I 42- " L U .-0 rn S/12 8/12 LI _ _ _ - _ - esigned ,/vms Coat.. ipcignd Additions and Remodels 5thven R. Vespested DL5IGNLR ie' Lake, Minnaso. 5,572 c<11 952-270-2M ssves.seintegra.net PROD, 19-033 Beedller START DATE: 2-12-20 CONTACT: APPROVED: X-X-20 3-5-20 SHEET 4 OF 6 2,0. U" BOX VAULT IN GONER'S SUITE NOTE: 2z6 EXTERIOR WALLS DNA. 2o4 INTERIOR WALLS UNA. _ PLANNING DEPARTMEP MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA These documents are owned by Designed Living, Inc. and reserves ALL rights. These plans may not be re-used, copied or assigned to another party nor shall they be modified or used in part In other designs without the prior written consent of Designed Living, Inc. ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/411 = 11 -0' 18' LOOR TRUSS 152 INSU * RIM 00. irk SEE ELEVATIONC FOR FACIA 4 SOFFIT.: SIDING PER ELEV. W/ HOUSE WRAP 1/16. 0.65. SHEATHING 015UL. a RIM 18" FLOOR TRUSSES 192" O.C. INSJL F -- F --' 7-3/4" T G FLOOR 6 - 16" OC. R-2I INSUL. VS 1/2. GYP. BD. ROOF VENTS 235* SHINGLE., 15. FELT(ICE 1 WATER PER CODE) 15/32. 12 12" ENERGY HEELS W/ AIR CHUTES VENT ATTIC AT I TO 300 UP 50% AT ROOF 50% AT SOFFITS TRUSSES e 24. O.C. (DESIGNED BY MFR 12/12 12 X15 5/B' GYP. BD. W/ VAPOR BARRIER SPECIAL • • • N • 2x5 - 16. 0.C. • R-2I INSUL. - VB • 1/2. Grp. BD. 7k yF GIRDER TRUSS " 3/4" T 1 G FLOOR -0" -2x6 - IS. OC. R-21 INSUL. VS I/2. Gr.. BD. \-5/8. GYP. BD. GIRDER TRUSS -- R Vi 1/", N 8▪ ;> A7/,t,N ' x•' 2 10 1J 21-INTL/L0. GYP. BD. NDING 1' \___ ...'"---2x6 TREATED W/ ANCI-OR INSUL. MATERIAL S LL LW SEALER eoLts FER wipe PROTECTION \-5/8. GYP. 13D. tW FLASHING , '--1 ,f ,, 10:(-4. GIRDER TRUSS----" .. L---1 2x4.1, FLAT -*/ STAIR NOTES: IF io 3- 12" LAMINATED STRINGERS 10" TREADS 1 3/4" MAX RISERS - 6'-8. MN. HEADROOM __, .,_,1 1 -- .' r 2x10 LANDING , j 2" RIGID NSUL. / E8" POURED WALL --.' r r--- //-3 1/2" CONC. FLOOR ,- DRAW TILE N [-FABRIC SLEEVE SET N WASHED 0 I I0 GRAVEL PER CODE WALL SHEATHING PER CROSS SECTION 6x6 Tf2T'D. POST SIMPSON ABA-66 POST BASE VENT ATTIC AT 1 TO 300 UI/ 50% AT ROOF 50% AT SOFFITS 2350 SHINGLE::: FELT(ICE 1 WATER PER CODE) 15/32. $1410. 2 to CONC. PIER PER PLAN NSUL. • RIM —5/8. GYP. BD. \-5/8. GYP BD. PORCH FRAMING PER PLAN TO BE FLUSH W/ HOUSE FRMG. LEDGER PER PLAN W/ 2- I/2"x5" LAG BOLTS, 16" O.G. FLOOR FRAMING PER PLAN PORCH DETAILS SCALE: 3/4" = 11 -0' HOUSE RIM LATERAL BRACING DEVICE - 4 LOCATIONS W/ REQUIRED FASTENING PER MANUFACTURER (SIMPSON DTTIZ OR EQUAL) FOUNDATION WALL (DESIGNED1.1. TRUSSES e 24" O l t BY 12 12 12 SPECIAL TRUSSES AT STAIRWAY, AND TOILET tEl 0/12 IS" FLOOR TRUSSES e 192" 00. INSUL. a RI PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA ROOF VENTS 12 12 -14:11_?C" VS 1/2 . GYP. 19D. 20x8 CROSS SECTION - SCALE: 3/8 / = 11 -011 T 1 G FLOOR INSU e RI VIB 71' 1/2" GYP. BD. --2" RIGID NSUL. H. POURED WALL To DRAFT TILE N FABRIC SLEEVE SET N WASHED GRAVEL PER CODE 0 2x10 LANDING INSUL. a RIM [3/4. T 1 G FLOOR 8' FLOOR TRUSSES * 192" 0.C. INSUL. * RIM Jy 0 2x10 LANDING \-5/8. GYP. BD. 1/2. CONC. FLOOR esigne61 lying Custom Designed Homes, Additions and Remodels .5toven K. Vesposted DESIGNER iriorLa4e, Mrnnnsora 75372 .=11.952-270-2797 ss,=sointwa.net PROD. # 19-033 BeeoNer START DATE 2-12-20 DRAWN ED' CONTACT: APPROVED. X-X-20 REVISIONS: 2-26-20 3-5-20 X X SHEET 5 0, 6 CROSS SECTION - A SCALE: 3/8" = 11 -0' of 1 0 20x5 These documents are owned by Designed Living, Inc. and reserves ALL rights. These plans may not be re-used, copied or assigned to another party nor shell they be modified or used In part In other designs without the prior written consent St Designed Living, Inc. CANT 2 -0• CANT. 2" RIGID INSUL. 8. POURED WALL ROOF !AEA.. EDGE 1141.540 PER TABLE RA 0 NU BLOCKING ROO 114136ES BETLEEN MIXES AT 24. MAX AT 2104M4X RILL MIGHT Etewsr AT lb' 00 a.c.* BRACED LLL PANEL INIEPSOR BRADED 1312/ PANEL FER PL.( 3.16d AT EACH 510040 21413ER 1311-1E41414 BLOOYE AT lb. 00 ALCM BRACED GALL PNEL INTERIOR OPTION-5 T. ADDITIONAL FRAtING 1241SER DREGET BELO/ BRACED WALL P4E1 Ed • ISO 00 ALCM BRACED UAL/ FA1E1- HIER/OR BRACED EALL PANEL FER FLAN 3-16d • 46'04 ALCM BRACED 11411 PANE BRAC44 MAIERIAL 942E AS M.-ACED CALL PAN. ROOF NEAT.* BRACED WALL EXTENDS LP BENEEN MOSES BOO 24 0,461.4 1011. BI MESE, CFEATE FROM 1200 1441.40 PER ASLE Ri•02.0 ROOF 111066E5 Al 24" 00 24% 6,04 KW 601-0 4.12446 BETLEE1114166E5 ATTAOED TO ICE PLATE 14.1110 PER TAME R6023(12 SORT HATEFUL 1.11eMOR BRACED BOLL PANEL MR FLAN EXTENED OVERHANG/HIGH HEEL "OPT." BRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTION PERPINDICULAR TO ROOF FRAMING PER SECTION R602.8.2 TENION STRAP FER TABLE 16022064 OPPOSITE SOE Of 63EATI42E FOR A PAN. EPLIM (F 143EDED)FANEL EDGES 614411 BE BL000£1, OMAR LIII1*1 24. OF 110- WWI. OE ROTI Cr 111014E41NG TO FR VIN- 16 MOORED. F 244 BLOOM IS USED 13E 2446 MET BE ROLM TO0E1ER EY 3 I6d 61421E4 HALE TOP <7 Rpt BRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTION PARALLEL TO FLOOR/CEILING FRAMING PER SECTION R602.108 FR4440 P, PP P TO BRACED LULL 1400. 0041. RE OR SAND JOST INTER OR OPTION-A EXTERIOR AMMON- MAME 141413ER DEECTLY BELOW BRACED SIN/ PNEL BOLTS FFR 6.110111240314 504.114/1 PER PLAN 51RACEI:, WALL PANEL CONNECTION DETAILS SCALE: 3/5" 6 I'-0" CCNTWOLIS READER 24124 GOBLE PORTAL FRNE 320 BRACED BALL 11114E-5 15000 Cf 4EALER YELE PORTAL ERNE P5 BRACED EUI PNEL Da9CFIFTAPIPR Mt NI 04' NET IEADERISTEEL 112R F210145(TE0) 2 IENT esigned ivIng C.stom Mooe, Additions and Remodels 510006 K. DESIGNER rior Lake, Minnesota 55372 oil.93 2-27012797 2-26-20 3-5-20 X SHEET 6 OF 6 SORTS MR ELEVATIONS BRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTION PERPINDICULAR TO ROOF FRAMING PER SECTION R602.8.2 3-16d • WOG. ALCNG BRACED SOIL PRAM. P511340103-AR TO P22,Frs BALL FP. CONT. 511 OR BUD 4016T ad • 11.• Or. ALCM FRACEP WALL 141451. EXTESSOR BRA.E3 LOLL PANEL PER PLAN 3-16d • 16.00 ALCM BRACED BULL 1342EL SOLID 14 n-ear eenem 114560 ATO0E0 TO TOP PLATES FAN 3.0d ALCM L94111 OF PRICED aft PNEL EXTERIOR BRACED SILL PANEL PER PLAN E><TENED OVERHANG/HIGH HEEL BRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTION PERPINDICULAR TO ROOF FRAMING PER SECTION 8602.82 3-16/1 • 16400 ALOE, BRACED GULL FNEL FRAKM PARALLEL TO BRACED 13,4L PNET. ONT. RE CR BAND MET Ed 1614 00 ALCM eRacer, 111•LL PATEL EX(EROR PRN44.2 UAL/ PANEL PER PLAN 3-16d ¨ 400 ALOE 1146.40 LULL PAM. EXTENT Of IPAOR U/ StYLE KIRTAL Ii24E OE BRACED TOLL PNET ii ~l'X'nC"EA'o ii i 11 .1_ L 11_ L COWL GARAGE DOOR 3EADER • ESE FLANS V TO RV R144430 CPE31323 '4----FASTEN TOP PLATE TO WADER EV 2 ROA OF lid EMBREY-6 • 31. 00 TM. WO LE 51441 OFPONTE SCE OF NE413160 - FASTER 14EATE4G TO 1E42E2 RV Ed COrION OR SAL, BOX NA1.5 61 34 GRD PATTERN WON AM 3' Of N 411 2-204`4, 414.11120451104 BLOOM ND ELLS/OP. POST 1411E41 FER TYLER/0230S 3/6.11.45.'00 612201)RAL TO RE/ 150041 Cf GALL • SEE TO 1•2614T FOR SPLIOS 610-A1140. 1412-04 FRA2114 4200 LE TIE DON DEAGEBIEED EGO 1041341104 Al0 HALED INTO FRA/136 L:b..."--1111. 42 54. DIA ANOER BOLT NSTAL1ED PFR 540316 TOP OF GARAGE FLOOR AT DOOR 0 11.4111665FER BOTTOM PLATE PER TABLE 6023 ITEM *32 AND TABLE 502.10.4 METHOD: CS-WSP SEE PLAN FOR PANEL LOCATIONS- TYPICALLY WITHIN 10' OF CORNERS AND 24' O.C. MAX. FULL WOG BLOIGNG 004 ALOG LEEN O BRACED GALL PAVEL • 16. 00 ALOE BRACED 1441 FAA.- NTERIOR BRACED 6011 1.4.131- PER FLAN 3-164 • WO. ALCM BRACED FULL PAM. ▪ 1.6141BLOGY40 COT. ALCM 1.04114 OF BRACED EAU PAtEL SOLID fx 0(44' WIZEN TRZSES ATTAG4ED TO TOP PLATES Ed • b. 00 ALO4 LEEN Cf BRACED LULL 1418 E0E35OR !RACED LULL rwa. PER FLAN STD./ENERGY HEEL 4,_--FRX4440 TO BRACED EAL. PMEL COL RTI OR 54D JOST BOLTS PER SECTION 540316 1141 PER PLAN 02N111043 lEADER VTR 04ELE PORTAL FRAFE6 TOO BRACED EEL PANELS KN. WM TE 00141 LENGE INTERIOR OARA6E WALL PORTAL FRAMES SCALE: 3/8 ' = 11-0 ' 4' BRACED WALL PANEL METHOD-CB-NSF PER TABLE R602.10.4 EXTERIOR BRACED WALL PANEL CONNECTION PERPINDICULAR TO FLOOR/CEILING FRAMING PER SECTION R602.10.8 PLANNING DEPAR MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDIN 2354 SHINGLE& 154 FELT(ICE 4 WATER PER CODE) 15/32. 84.17G. R-49 ATTIC 54SUL. VAPOR BATRRJER 5/8" GYRED. '-0' 6' TO 13 OPENta 'RAInfrITd1WERT1=t2 TTP MO LE STRAP OPPOSITE SDE OF SEAN 1461101 NEAT1ING TO FF-ALDERLIA ed .14121 OR 0AL, BO% RALE 21 3" CAM PATTERN EWEN 4103 SA IN ALL FIN 2-M4 144126(514143S BLOGKE AND ELLS1OP. STUD POST ME 0014 PER TABLE R602103 !, IEGET OF Mr S'R'EEL r„ ROG FOR SPLICES 2.1o1 FRAM* I • KR 4200 LE TIE COIN DEVICEMIVED 400 FOODATION ANO NAILED 1410 FRNiNG MALL LIE bEA VOOD 241111GERAL FOR A PAIEL SPLICE (F NEEDED/ PA41- 40441 44.0.1 BE 121-00052 AND CC.. 14144224' OF MED-XEOIT. 441 OF TTE EFEAING. TO FR.1144 NAME IS WOWED. F 244 ELOCK4 16 USW TIE 2445 11161 5E114150 TOWITER RV 3 lbd 9262512 NYS 2x6 STUDS' AT 16" VAPOR BARRIER 142" GTP. BO. 3/4" 74G SUB FLOOR [GLUED AND NAILED IS" DEE 6EE LEFT FOR TYP. PORTAL PRNE COST. MOEN STRAP FER TABLE 9602306.A (04 OPPOSITE WE OF SIP-4140 VENT ATTIC AT 1 TO 300 LW 50% AT ROOF 50% AT SOFFITS TRU88E6 • 24" (DESIGNED BY NP TOP CP 19241 TOP GP GONG ROOR AT OPERNG MN (V 061 ANCHOR BOLT PETALLED PER R.40316( 50 23010//64. KATE 114314ER ON CONCRETE FOUNDATION AICIOR 54 MOEN 0940 FLOOR 1924144E 44151ELT PER PLAN 62 WOO SIRL'11112AL PAWL SEATIRE WOO 6131101144. PAM. 340-4130.0 TO TOP OP 540 OR R21 JOST 02 PRATO* ROOMS APPLED ACRCES SEA114136 JOE UTH A CANOPY OF 610. IN FIORE AND VERT. 98501015 TOP OP FLOOR At 0141E0 NY. SOLE PLATE TO FLR TT PER TABLE R6023(0 ON RAISED WOOD FLOOR - FRAMING ANCHOR OPTION TvArn-vitpho.nr- p A 0000 611aL,101. PANEL 61.EATHM N i grAWIMMSIEMPV CatiCN HALO AT 3' 00 AS 11401221 TOP GE 9.00R AT OPE% MOOR FR44160 ASSEYELY FPR FLANS, 1/X0 STRUCTRAL PANEL 610-411420 NA. EOLE ELATE TO I9.R FRAtRE FER TABLE R6023(1) •-_,_-4-4,__-._,-.4-1 •__,_..,_A__,_.,__A_, \J_A Z.-- VAPOR BARRER I.3.-0, , / • ,A__.A._-A 1, A__A INSULATE GARAGE 503" TYPE-X GYP. BD. FIRE TAPED -/ 30'-01 CEILP4G COMPLETE R-35 h131 -----t-------1 46" IDP. PER ELEVATION 048.111411 WEATI-111,* 2v5 STUDS AT 16" O.C. GARAGE WALL INSUL. VAPOR BARRIER 1/2" GYP. BD. 141119f FLOOR BEYOND 4. 9 4``MrsIt. 5C.513 , \ LEY ON RAISED WOOD FLOOR - OVERLAP FLOOR OPTION 2' LEDGE COMPACTED BASE MATERIAL 8" 0010. FROST WALL 1E458" Calc. KG. "C5-1='" CONTINUOUSLY SHEAT 11 PORTAL PRAMS I 'I „ 1 „1_ 11 ,, f These documents are owned by Designed Living, Inc. and reserves ALL rights. These plans may not be re-used, copied or assigned to another party nor shall they be modified or used in part In Other designs without the prior written consent of Designed LiWng, Ina SCALE: 3/5" a 14 -0" TYPICAL OF WINDOW WALLS CROSS SECTION C SCALE: 3/8 11 1 1-011 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA e kA) PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA )1AOCN) )A)6 -siO6 r1/1-(A) PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 10 2020 CITY OF EDINA v\A 1r\ v\ S d C?:. 1'\ -nn • PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA Authentislgo ID: 34CA63BC.A8F4-4461-8926-C8402300812 Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. Please fully explain your answers using additional sheets of paper as necessary. The Proposed Variance will: YES NO Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable k.," <.; e s .A- cl Wks \- w-. Ck\kto,v-e 4 4C ,6:C C) Oon‘j rAl'‘ t r 0"4:4,1 Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district --r VC-) A -Z. .14 NO ' eAN Nn c..et rt ‘Ai \ (IN A-11 , A 9 Lt w.ts x. A- ek. '•-kr c), ck ce.,A cs. 0\ 0,17 1,4,_ est 4 e, CI; 10) 1' V\./ Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance A \A (20 .A\n ‘k3 -19-f (14f tbj - kk.5 law e r‘ 5 1 t 'Act , v.‘ V‘ '‘ 3 \) 010 5 ;, o_v‘x) cA-(AVt•V(' St.).;:k‘n 1,ksk • -,",3 cx 1.4 \.2 -A- f\ t‘ Q-• A" to y" crk. rZ w Ate Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood 'Tk-z 1-10 Ch,SPA t•re. ,A4..? 4-1,a r ht3 &•;(..S 51-1 6 1 -Zvsd% Lv.z. t.1 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 1 0 2020 CITY OF EDINA 2 DATE: 3/20/2020 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 4248 Alden Ave - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included existing and proposed surveys (dated 2/20/20 and 3/4/20, respectively) and stormwater management plan dated 3/4/2020 Summary of Work The applicant proposes demolish the existing residential structure and build a new home. The request is for a variance to a setback. Easements No comments. Grading and Drainage Site drains to private property, Morningside Rd, and Alden Dr—ultimately to Weber Pond. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Large area well on north side of building has the potential to increase foundation flood exposure from roof runoff water overtopping gutters. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to relocate/replace the existing curb cut. A driveway entrance permit will be required. The street was reconstructed in 2014. Refer to standard plates 540 and 542 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary are served from Morningside Rd. A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP-024. Sump line available for connection near the SW corner of the lot. If connecting to the City sump line, a permit and compliance with City of Edina Building Policy SP-006 will be required. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required, applicant will need to verify with the district. A sealed well is located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. Retaining walls are proposed. If greater than 4-feet, the applicant will be required to submit drawings, cross- section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer. Applicant must maintain sidewalks open for pedestrian access during construction. Road or lane closures require a permit from the Public Works Department. Buildable Area within Required Setbacks Date: April 29, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris tine Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-20-11, A 1.91 foot firs t floor height variance for a new home at Woodland C ircle Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he request is a variance to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. T he subject property is located North of M innehaha C reek consisting of a walk out rambler with an attached garage. T he property owner is planning to teardown the existing home and rebuilt on the property with a two story walk out home with an attached three car garage. T he applicant is requesting to increase the first floor elevation 1.91 feet higher than the allowable 1 foot increase in first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 89 Woodland C ircle. T he property is 23,314 square feet in area and is located on the south east side of Woodland C ircle and Woodland L ane, and is within the floodplain. T he City of Edina’s E ngineering standards require the basement elevation of any new home on the property to be 2 feet higher than the F E M A base flood elevation. T he existing home has a basement that is lower than the base flood elevation and was built prior to the first F E M A floodplain study conducted in 1979 to determine flood risk areas. T he new basement low opening will comply with the minimum low opening requirement established for the property. T he new walk-out basement will be brought up to low opening requirement and will provide a ceiling height of 8’-10”. T he proposed first floor elevation of the house will be at 872.66, which will be 1.91’ higher than the 1foot increase allowed by ordinance, (a 2.91’ total increase). AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report with Attachments Date: April 29, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.C . To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P reliminary P lat with Multiple Variances at 7413 and 7425 York Terrac e for Blaz R azul Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the proposed S ubdivision with Variances. I N TR O D U C TI O N: B laz R asul is proposing to subdivide his properties at 7413 and 7425 York Terrace into three lots. T he existing homes on both lots would remain, and a new home would be constructed on the new Lot 2, created in between the two existing homes. (S ee applicant narrative and plans attached.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 59 feet for L ot 1; 3. Lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 feet for L ot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and 4. Lot area variances from 9,962 s.f. to 8,909 s.f. for L ot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Engineering Memo Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans and Plat Site Location Maps Street View of the Properties Staff Alternative Plat York Hills Plat - 1951 Recent Subdivis ions April 29, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director PUBLIC HEARING: Preliminary Plat with Variances for 7413 & 7425 York Terrace Information / Background: Blaz Rasul is proposing to subdivide his properties at 7413 and 7425 York Terrace into three lots. The existing homes on both lots would remain, and a new home would be constructed on the new Lot 2, created in between the two existing homes. (See applicant narrative and plans attached.) To accommodate the request the following is required: 1. A subdivision; 2. Lot width variances from 75 feet to 59 feet for Lot 1; 3. Lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 feet for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and 4. Lot area variances from 9,962 s.f. to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. Within this neighborhood, the median lot area is 9,962 square feet, median lot depth is 133 feet, and the median lot width is 75 feet. (See attached median calculations.) Please note that lot width is measured at a point 50-feet back from the front lot line. The total width of these three lots is 225 feet which would equal three 75-foot wide lots. It is the desire of the applicant to preserve the home Tudor style home at 7425 York Terrace, which was built in 1936 (proposed Lot 3). The irregular shapes of the proposed lots are caused by the applicant’s desire to keep the existing home at 7425, and it appears that the surveyor that produced the plans believed that lot width is measured at the front lot line. If it were, each lot would be 75 feet in width with the angled lot lines near the street. The home at 7425 York Terrace and the adjacent home to the east at 7430 Xerxes (built in 1934) are the original homes on this block. The lot at 7430 Xerxes is unplatted. The original plat of York Hills was done in 1951. The rest of the lots on this block were platted around these two homes. STAFF REPORT Page 2 (see attached original York Hills Plat.) The rest of the homes on this block within the York Hills plat were built in 1951 and 1952. Surrounding Land Uses The lots to the north, east and south are zoned and guided low-density residential. The property across the street to the west is the Yorkdale Townhomes, zoned PRD-3, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Existing Site Features The existing lots contain two single-family homes. Planning Guide Plan designation: Single-dwelling residential Zoning: R-1, Single-dwelling district Lot Dimensions Area Lot Width Depth REQUIRED 9,962 s.f. 75 feet 135 feet Lot 1 8,909 s.f.* 59 feet* 132 feet* Lot 2 8,328 s.f.* 75 feet 107 feet* Lot 3 8,859 s.f.* 92 feet 107 feet* * Variance Required Lot Configuration Staff has concern with the proposed lot line configuration. Irregular shaped lots lines with jogs in them often lead to future neighbor conflicts on the location of the property lines. Staff would recommend straightening them out as depicted in the attached map labeled (Staff Alternative Plat). The reconfiguration would not impact the proposed building pad or existing and proposed setbacks. The applicant is agreeable to the shifted lot lines. If this proposal is approved, this can be made a condition of the preliminary approval, and the plans revised prior to final plat approval. There would be no change to the requested Variances. Grading/Drainage and Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them acceptable, subject to conditions. (See the attached memo from the city engineer.) Drainage would flow to the street STAFF REPORT Page 3 in the front yard and to the rear toward rainwater garden/infiltration basins that would be constructed in the rear yard of Lot 2, where the new home would be built. (See attached grading and drainage plan.) There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring properties. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired. The detailed grading plans would be reviewed by the city engineer at the time of a building permit application. A construction management plan would be required for the construction of the new home. Specific hook-up locations would be reviewed at the time of a building permit for each lot. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit would also be required. Note that the existing driveways on Lots 1 and 3 are dirt or gravel. Sec. 36-1322 of the City Code requires that “off-street parking spaces and circulation areas shall be surfaced and maintained with an all-weather, durable and dust-free surfacing material.” Therefore, as a condition of approval of the request, these driveways shall be paved. History of Subdivision Requests with Variances The City of Edina has considered several subdivision requests with variances in this general area. (See attached area map.) The following is the history in the past 15 years: History of Recent Subdivisions with Variances 1. In 2006, the property at 5901 France Avenue received variances to build four (4) 66-foot wide lots consistent with the area. (Median = 9,269 s.f. & 73 feet wide.) 2. In 2008, 6120 Brookview Avenue was proposed to be divided into two (2) 50-foot lots; however, the applicant withdrew the request before action was taken. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 3. In 2009, a 100-foot lot at 5920 Oaklawn was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,699 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 4. In 2011, the property at 5829 Brookview was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,769 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 5. In 2012, the property at 6109 Oaklawn was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,701 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 6. In 2012, 6120 Brookview was again proposed for subdivision. That request was denied. (Median = 6,700 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 7. In 2012, 5945 Concord was denied the request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 8. In 2015, a 100-foot lot at 5825 Ashcroft Avenue was granted variances to divide into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,790 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 9 In 2015, 5945 Concord was approved for a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 10,028 s.f. & 77 feet wide.) 10. In 2016, 5845 Kellogg Avenue was denied a request to subdivide the property into two (2) 50-foot lots. (Median = 6,715 s.f. & 50 feet wide.) 11. In 2017, 6124 Ewing Avenue was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width and area variances. (Median = 11,500 s.f. & 80 feet wide.) 12. In 2017, 5404 Park Place was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 65 feet for each lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,705 and 8,840 square feet. (Median = 8,107 s.f. & width was 60 feet wide.) 13. In 2019, 5841 Oaklawn was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for one lot; and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 8,793 and 6,694 square feet. 14. In 2019, 4625 Lexington was approved for a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 60 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,306 square feet to 8,106 and 8,128 square feet. (Median area - 9,306 square feet, median lot depth - 135 feet, and the median lot width 68 feet) 15. In 2020, 5928 Ashcroft was denied a request to subdivide into two (2) lots with lot width variances from 75 feet to 50 feet for both lots, and lot area variances from 9,000 square feet to 6,813 and 6,790 square feet. (Median area – 8,841 s.f., median lot depth – 135 and median width was 66 feet.) In the instances when subdivisions have been denied, the area immediately surrounding the site contained a wide variety of lot sizes. In instances when subdivisions have been approved, the requesting lot was oversized (twice as large) compared to lots in the immediate area. The only other large lot on this block is the previously mentioned unplatted lot to the east. Park Dedication Park dedication for one new lot would be required to be paid at the time of building permit in the amount of $5,000. Primary Issue Are the findings for a variance met? • Are the findings for a variance met? Yes. Staff believes that the findings for a Variance are met for this subdivision. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Per state law and the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: a) Will the proposal relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with the ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the two original homes built in the 1930’s and were platted around in 1951 in order to preserve them. The subject property and the lot to the east are oversized for this block. If these structures were removed in 1951, each lot on this block would be equal in size. As demonstrated, the median width in this neighborhood is 75 feet wide, which is the average of the subject three lots. The widths, area and depths proposed vary compared to the neighborhood in order to preserve the existing home at 7425 York Terrace. The request is reasonable, it that it would allow the same number of lots on York Terrace, if every lot on street were 75 feet wide. This is more consistent in the neighborhood than the existing 150- foot wide lot. b) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The circumstances regarding the irregular shape and size of the lot are unique in this area and caused by the previous property owner that subdivided the property to maintain the existing home at 7425 York Terrace. These conditions were not created by the applicant. c) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed improvements requested by the variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The new single-family home would be constructed on lot similar in size to the lots on this block within the York Hills Plat. The property to the west is the back side of the Yorkdale Townhomes, a high-density residential development. Options for Consideration As demonstrated on pages 3-4 of this report, there are options for consideration when considering a subdivision like this one. The following outlines options for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Denial Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed three lot subdivision of 7413 & 7425 York Terrace and a lot width variance from 75 feet to 59 for Lot 1; lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and lot area variances from 9,962 square feet to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The Subject Properties are conforming single-family residential lots with new single-family homes that have a taxable market value of $260,600 and $277,700. Reasonable use of the properties exists today. 2. There are no practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance standards. The requested variances to split this lot are not reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. The existing lot is similar in size to the adjacent property to the east. 3. The practical difficulty alleged by the applicant’s proposal to subdivide the property is self- created. 4. The need for the variance is created only by Applicant’s desire to maximize the return on its investment. Such economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed three lot subdivision of 7413 & 7425 York Terrace with a lot width variance from 75 feet to 59 for Lot 1; lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and lot area variances from 9,962 square feet to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Except for the variances, the proposal meets the required standards and ordinance for a subdivision. 2. The practical difficulty is caused by the location of the two original homes that were platted around in 1951 in order to preserve them. The subject property and the lot to the east are oversized for this block. If these structures were removed in 1951, each lot on this block would be equal in size. 3. The median width in this neighborhood is 75 feet wide, which is the average of the subject three lots. The widths, area and depths proposed vary compared to the neighborhood in order to preserve the existing home at 7425 York Terrace. 4. The request is reasonable, it that it would allow the same number of lots on York Terrace, if every lot on street were 75 feet wide. STAFF REPORT Page 7 5. The requested variances to split this lot are reasonable in the context of the immediate neighborhood. 6. The median width in this neighborhood is 75 feet wide, which is more consistent with the proposed lots and not the existing 150-foot wide lot. 7. The practical difficulty of the lot depths of Lots 2 and 3 are caused by the location of the home at 7430 Xerxes at the time of the original platting of these lots in 1951. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The City must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. The lot lines in the final plat shall be straightened per the staff recommendation. 2. The existing dirt driveways on Lots 1 and 3 shall be re-surfaced and maintained with an all- weather, durable and dust-free surfacing material per Section 36-1322 of the City Code. 3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following items must be submitted: a. Submit evidence of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District approval. The City may require revisions to the preliminary plat to meet the district’s requirements. b. A curb-cut permit must be obtained from the Edina engineering department. c. A grading, drainage and erosion control plan subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The proposed plans shall meet all conditions outlined in the engineering memo dated April 14, 2020. d. There shall be no increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private property. e. Any disturbance to the roadway caused by the construction of the new homes must be repaired by replacing the asphalt pavement from curb-to-curb and from saw-cut to saw-cut. f. A construction management plan will be required for the construction of the new homes. g. Utility hook-ups are subject to review of the city engineer. h. Park dedication fee of $5,000 is due prior to issuance of a building permit. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the proposed three lot subdivision of 7413 & 7425 York Terrace with a lot width variance from 75 feet to 59 for Lot 1; lot depth variances from 135 feet to 132 for Lot 1 and to 107 for lots 2 and 3; and lot area variances from 9,962 square feet to 8,909 s.f. for Lot 1, to 8,328 s.f. for Lot 2 and 8,859 s.f. for Lot 3; subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City Decision: June 16, 2020 DATE: 4/14/2020 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 7425 York Terrace - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included existing topography, preliminary plat, grading, drainage and erosion control plan, and stormwater management plan dated 3/2/20. Summary of Work The applicant proposes to subdivide the lot and build a second structure. Easements A 10-foot wide easement runs north-south along the eastern portion of the property for an 8-inch PVC sanitary sewer gravity main approximately 5-9-feet deep. Applicant required to televise pre and post construction to verify integrity. Grading and Drainage The existing site drains to private property and ultimately to Richfield, MN. The proposed site drains to York Terrace and private property. Stormwater Mitigation The permit applicant will be required to submit hydraulic modelling to confirm no increase in peak rate to private property. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. A rain garden is proposed in the rear yard. The applicant shall coordinate with the downstream resident at 7430 Xerxes Ave S to determine how to transmit overflow from the rain garden across the property to avoid concentrated flows directed at or near private structures. Wellhead Protection A sealed well is located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to a new driveway entrance. A driveway entrance permit will be required. The street was milled and overlaid in 2019. Refer to standard plates 540 and 541 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from York Terrace and private property, respectively. One-inch water service lines from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP-024. Sewer and water connection fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required, applicant will need to verify with the district. Retaining walls are proposed. If greater than 4-feet, the applicant will be required to submit drawings, cross- section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer. City of Edina Planning Commission Request for lot subdivision Dear Mr. Teague and Edina Planning Commission members, This is a request for subdivision of the preliminary plat and proposal to build a house on the subdivided land that we own at 7425 York Terrace, Edina, Mn 55435. Our family: Me, my wife and kids have owned the house for several years. When we moved, it was only us, newlyweds, and now we have 2 kids. Our kids are growing in height and size. As much as we want to fit everything: their clothes, toys, beds, we are finding less and less room to accommodate their needs. We desperately need room for them to thrive. They were many days when we really wished to have the opportunity to grow. We love our neighborhood. It has everything to offer a family can ask for. It has everything to have a healthy and happy childhood. Prior to submitting the application for subdivision, for a long time we have worked with surveyors, home builders and architects to ensure that this goal is doable. Surveyors did very detailed work to ensure that each of City of Edina Planning commission guidelines are followed thoroughly. We have partnered with Seasoned custom home building company Dingman construction on the home plan, measurements and timelines for this lot. I am sending attached, the detailed home plan for your review as well. This, very house plan was erected by Dingman construction several times. The appearance and appeal of the house design is modern and would benefit our neighborhood a lot helping to increase its beauty, value and attractiveness. Dear Planning Committee members, We really appreciate your time, effort and support in reviewing our application. Your support means a world to us. Having the opportunity to build, would ensure that our family will give back for years to come back to our neighborhood and City community. Thank you very much, Blaz Rasul and Zuli Rasul. N./ DENOTES DENOTES x999.99 DENOTES - 999 - -DENO TES FFE DENOTES 0 DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES NOTES 1. THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 2. NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. 4. NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECOF 5. EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVE OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY RESIDENT TESTIMONY. OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE PRESENT. VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICE. SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (651) 454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. No. DATE DESCRIPTION BY EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY BUILDING SETBACKS ZONING: R1 = SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT HOUSE: FRONT = 30 FT SIDE = 10 FT (LOTS 75 FT OR GREATER) REAR=25 FT L..J I L1J I , L1- /-• • ., / I , I L 1J 1 1 1 L 1J 4 2.1: /4-• J • e /•" • [ 83/ 64/ il 9 ;. 1,1 I ,875-- / \ l EXI I STING #7413 1 ( ASPEKT, LLC 3 \ \ i 1 HOUSE / f PIO: 3202824310023 \ \ I I ." -)34.74 \ A 10 ..- ,_.7,_ ; , \ \ 1 ..- DttcK / r ..... _ , ..< , , \, N. •‘ \ \ \ 1 °24 /". •., 1 A "... / '4 ..., \ \IT \ \ ‘f \t / •• ...., f >, / • ) Vi) \ \ \_ ..., ..'"... CI' Cb C.' C 1 , % 4T REI-EREN(E NAIL / ,--- CHAIN /LINK /I / 1 0t 75 NbRTH ROM ..-- FENtE r-T, - -7. - -I - NEI COR. pF Lovg N 1'/ / L t I I ' 'V._ `, \ ..,,v, „."--"--e,f :-.-- ...,........., I / / I e' e' „e / / / eY... ibl'e( " -4:RETAINING / / / -' / I WALL ___ — /' / / / ...., --..., / / ,Z. / ' / Q ( cb 1 i / 1. 1 I - I 1 1 I i I , co I I I I f 1 1 I 1 I I 1 k 1 N. ,.. I BLAZRA$ • L i( ii I co L I PIO: .20.824 10d22 I 0 1 I LI__ 7 _I " 1 -d,' 03 2i'; I 1 a 1 I I -87 )... i I 1 \ k I 1 r 'N -`g111 ,-WIRE BLASTIC - - F — 35.09 Aj DRIVEWAY -N. ../---1, N. ...375__. .--' r FY/4 22.41/h '/, ' EXISTING 72 7 GARAGE 4 . : :/FFE = 874.83/ ' ziL y////////./74c) 9,-, e-• 38.34 HARDCOVER EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING DECK CREDIT TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING HARDCOVER I / I I .0Z, r _ -.. I % os ifik1)11 '1 I /16.0//e- .5 ._ a 38.31 ,_ _ .5.0, _ _F a_;. 1 \ d, •.,96.9 #7425 // /EXISTING HOUSE/ FFE = 878.59 LL=870.16 / 3 Y W IS 17429 EXTING HOUSE I col •-•1 N. DECK 1\ '19.) 107.50 / /, THOMAS KESSLER 8 PIO: 3202824310021 / / II RAIN •12. GARDEN 992 SQ. FT. 457 SQ. FT. 375 SQ. FT. (150 SQ. FT.) 16,198 SQ. FT. 10.3 % 00'14'53" W - FOUND) .1 FROM COMPUTED COR. CHRIS K. KIM & MIHWA KIM PIO: 3202824310001 1^, i• tI • #7430 EXISTING HOUSE V ". Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 30 60 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES SET 1/2" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "PLS 25105" DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOUR LINE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION CHAINLINK FENCE WOOD FENCE MEASURED DISTANCE PLATTED DISTANCE CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW ELECTRIC POWER POLE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB TREE LINE ELECTRIC METER AIR CONDITIONER SIGN/POST GAS METER LIGHT POLE FIRE HYDRANT V A 24. 82 N 89°56'02" W 91; ;; REFERENCE BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 833.84 (NAVD 88) MNDOT DISK "STERN". PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 0 9 2020 CITY OF EDINA LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, YORK HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. (3 I. O C..2) ELIZABETH CHASE (J) PIO: 3202824310017 r AR snwo AGE ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com I HEREBY CERTIFY NAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER NE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Vead cZa'cit. DATED: 03/02/20 VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 DRAWN BY: IS CHECKED BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 20-007 SHEET Cl A W 1/4 CORNER, SEC. 32, TWP. 28, RNG. 24, HENNEPIN COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF (1)INA 107.50 107.64 (P) THOMAS KESSLER 8 PID: 3202824310021 _a ,r Y - — 24.82 N 89°56'02" ) \c <-‘ e W Y ee 1.) O O rN S 00'1 1 '36" W B DRIVEWAY r WIRE ELASTIC BUILDING SETBACKS ZONING: R1 = SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT HOUSE: FRONT = 30 FT SIDE = 10 FT (LOTS 75 FT OR GREATER) REAR=25 FT HARDCOVER OF LOT 1, BL.1 EXISTING HOUSE EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING DECK CREDIT TOTAL LOT AREA EXISTING HARDCOVER 992 SQ. FT. 457 SQ. FT. 375 SQ. FT. (150 SQ. FT.) 16,198 SQ. FT. 10.3% JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 PROJECT NO.: 20-007 DRAWN BY: IS CHECKED BY: VS SHEET C2 A I BLAZ RA $6',: t PID . 3202824310/22 I k. I I /EXISTING HOUSE 0 1-1 EXISTING GARAGE P., FFE = 874.83- #7413 EXISTING HOUSE #742.5 / FFE = 878.59 /s DECK 'I LL=870.16 1\ _ \t //44 Y/ 126 \co ,i6.ovtes 38 \— rk !RETAINING WALL ___ 1 /25/7179.6 0 —I )1 ARACE X 15.86 (f) CHRIS K. KIM & MIHWA KIM PID: 3202824310001 Co i s, 7 ' — FOUND "*F720M COMPUPED COR. 25 E . • ELIZABETH CHASE PIO: 3202824310017 #7430 EXISTING HOUSE 875- 11 ASPEKT, LLC PID: 3202824310023 \ DitCK ) 1 , 0 4 Sq.': ,\ 9',5-4---a'021---LE 870. BW / —>< ,<< —873 0-TW - —1-872.0 TW / V N x 8 6 7: G .0 BW/ 145'' \ rk-F -.132. 54 / .i. \ \ 9•So, 61 5A-11 c I o\ 1 S T RE CHAIN /LINK /I / I 0,75 Ne• FENCE —7`— -3-HE'V . r P)." _1 / PROPOSED ' HOUSE PAD FFE=880.6 TOB=879.1 a=870.1 GAR=878.6 W i 1 16.60 I 2 I ,cv ",‘ , I \ —h/2141(7c 1/ \ I RAIN q:D I 549453" W -S I W 25 r.ARn 0 <I. I " 2.5 •\ u)7.31' Yi/o N a956-U2 F " A, 2331.07 N. LINE OF THE NE 1/4 OF 7HE SW 1/4, SEC. 32, lo TWP. 28, RNG. 24 .•-• CC! fr) O N I 1 / / / co/ co / 3 1.0 O O 1`6 \ 1 N WEV'30/-1A / N F 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON . 4j 0 DENOTES SET 1/2" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "PLS 25105" -4- 0 DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT TL DENOTES BOUNDARY LINE DENOTES LOT LINE DENOTES SETBACK LINE X999.99 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION - 999 -DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR LINE FFE DENOTES FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 0 — DENOTES CHAINLINK FENCE 0— DENOTES WOOD FENCE (M) DENOTES MEASURED DISTANCE (P) DENOTES PLATTED DISTANCE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, YORK HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. AREAS Lot 1, Block 1 = 8,909± Sq.Ft. (0.20 Acres) Lot 2, Block 1 = 8,328± Sq.Ft. (0.19 Acres) Lot 3, Block 1 = 8,859± Sq.Ft. (0.20 Acres) RAMZEY ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT SUNDAL PROPERTIES, LLC PID: 3202824310024 JANET ELIZABETH PEARSON S 89'56'02" E 11 132.68 PID: 3202824310016 V •• Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 30 I.- -0 #7429 EXISTING HOUSE S 8955'28" E / 35.09 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE DENOTES SHRUB DENOTES TREE LINE DENOTES ELECTRIC METER DENOTES AIR CONDITIONER DENOTES SIGN/POST DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT REFERENCE BENCHMARK PROPOSED HARDCOVER OF LOT 2. BL. 1 ELEVATION = 833.84 (NAVD 88) MNDOT DISK PROPOSED HOUSE 1,784 SQ. FT. "STERN". PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 666 SQ. FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 8,328 SQ. FT. PROPOSED HARDCOVER 29.4 % NOTES 1. THE BASIS OF THE BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED. 2. NO SPECIFIC SOIL INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN COMPLETED 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY PROPOSED ELEVATIONS. 4. NO TITLE INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THIS SURVEY. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ALL EASEMENTS OF RECORD. 5. EXISTING UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOWN HEREON OWNER LOCATED EITHER PHYSICALLY ON THE GROUND DURING THE SURVEY OR FROM EXISTING RECORDS MADE AVAILABLE TO US OR BY RESIDENT TESTIMONY. OTHER UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAY BE PRESENT. VERIFICATION AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AND SERVICES SHOULD BE OBTAIN FROM THE OWNERS OF RESPECTIVE UTILITIES BY CONTACTING GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT (651) 454-0002 PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR EXCAVATION. NO._ DATE DESCRIPTION BY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Veal" 51.1.' Yiv DATED: 03/02/20 VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com DATED: 03/02/20 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1 /670.17/ `e4., est DRAWN BY: IS CHECKED BY: VS PROJECT NO.: 20-007 SHEET C4 A FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 / I /875- 1 I ASPEKT, LLC I PID: 3202824310023 J r-874- 10 I .., / / , \ I- _.\ ' ..-- DECK / 1 -4 4. s\ .7 j "-'4-975-46T6-iOC-Erl'• < ., -873.0- TW - \--2,v 2 870.9 BW / ' • tri ".../%1E1 WOF. r 7,.5-6, ., F,..„,, 0 A.\ .e„, C E161#20 RAGE 54. 0 4 414;* 1CNi.:C _ 4!1i‘l'fl / 4: \IN LINK 878.6 WA:1101404/111b..1v .7%141 107.79 (M)-107.9 ; 1 WALL ,,4 --- --: RETAININ ----V41/4: r.1 /, NI / ti / ti / 11 t (Is) - I 4 I 1/4 1 0 0 • Q ' wl ) 9R- P\ 30 -875 DRIVEWAY \ 30 e 2,1 / O O #741.3 EXISTING HOUSE 6'0 ,--WIRE 'PLASTIC', F / co 1878.91 30 27% 178.6 0:1 I -47;1 6 0 1 BLAZ RASUL PID: .520282.1:10022 , PROPOSED HOUSE PAD FFE=880.6 TOB=879.1 LL=870.1 I GAR=878.6 7 // , 22.4 ' / /43 / d .,/ \ EXISTING * 4 ..:3 ' / GARAGE c, „ „ , ' FFE = 874.83/ e c.) ,{•`' 't `7 / ' c, eY I.' ////_(/////A: (5 -) #7425 EXISTING HOUSE FFE = 878.59 LL=870.16 N ---.1 *et* 4.4k :4 ...... 011 ' -,Y (:. l, ... *-A,..,..4-1* --- 38. J. \ _F _.."-- \ 196-, 's1 ‘9_, ',.. .."'-‘9„>i 11 `2• 'n co / \J'"- '3) \ 0. 0 1 25 C) \ IN 14-3 \co IW 25 I, ELIZABETH CHASE PID: 3202824310017 24.82 N 89'56'02" W f Y e P ► \ I --x872.0 TW 870.0 BW 41 • FOUNO,IA FROM COMPLI(FED COR. E #7430 EXISTING HOUSE I S 0071'36" IN I 3)5.86 CHRIS K. KIM & MIHWA KIM PID: 3202824310001 L 0 (r) (o V • LEGEND EXISTING DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES x999.99 DENOTES 999 -'DENOTES FFE DENOTES 0- DENOTES I=1- DENOTES PLANNING DEP r DENOTES IviN6ENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT (--ao BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION (r_=) EXISTING CONTOUR LINE El FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION CHAINLINK FENCE WOOD FENCE MEASURED DISTANCE PLATTED DISTANCE 'AD DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE DRAINAGE FLOW ELECTRIC POWER POLE DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB TREE LINE ELECTRIC METER AIR CONDITIONER SIGN/POST GAS METER LIGHT POLE FIRE HYDRANT • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON 0 DENOTES SET 1/2" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "PLS 25105" -4-- PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE 1111111110 DENOTES PROPOSED SILT FENCE 854.1 DENOTES PROPOSED GRADE DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE FLOW - eee- DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL NOTES (EDINA) 1. ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA, INCLUDING TEMPORARY STOCKPILES, MUST BE STABILIZED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE LATER THAN 14 DAYS AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. STABILIZE WITH TEMPORARY SEED AND STRAW MULCH APPLIED AT 2 TONS PER ACRES. 2. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND AROUND ANY STOCKPILES. SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED AND MAINTINED WEEKLY (AND WITHIN 24 HRS OF A 0.5" RAINFALL) UNTIL FINAL SEEDING AND MULCHING (OR SODDING) OF LOT. 3. DUST CONTROL IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMIT HOLDER. THE PERMIT HOLDER MUST ELIMINATE DUST PROBLEMS UPON RECEIVING NOTICE FROM THE BUILDING OFFICIAL THAT THERE IS A DUST PROBLEM. 4. STREET CLEANING SHALL OCCUR DAILY OR AS NEEDED. 5. BUILDER TO INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE AT STORM INLET, WEST SIDE OF KIPLING AVE SOUTH OF ADDRESS #4026. TO BE CLEANED OUT REGULARLY. PROVIDE EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TO REDUCE FLOODING POTENTIAL (IF APPLICABLE). PLACE DEVICE TO PREVENT THE CREATION OF DRIVING HAZARDS OR OBSTRUCTIONS. 6. BUILDER TO PROVIDE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRECAUTIONS DESCRIBED UNDER EDINA CITY CODE CHAPTER 10, ARTICLE 7 - LITTERING IN THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION WORK. 7. RICK OLSON (612-910-3246) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CLEANLINESS OF THE SITE AND THE MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS. 8. THE STOCKPILE LOCATION SHALL BE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LOT (SET BACK 20' FROM REAR PROPERTY LINE). 9. SITE ACCESS SHALL BE VIA A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ABOVE EXISTING CONCRETE DRIVEWAY. TO THE EXTENT PRACTICABLE, HEAVY EQUIPMENT AND TRUCKS SHALL BE PROHIBITED FROM PARKING OUTSIDE OF THE GRAVEL PAD AT SITE ACCESS. 10. AS IS PRACTICABLE, BUILDER TO MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS SILT FENCE ACROSS THE SITE ACCESS WHEN NOT IN USE. 11. IN THE CASE OF PUMPED DISCHARGE, CONTRACTOR MUST FILTER ANY TURBID WATER THROUGH SAND AND SILT FENCE BEFORE DISCHARGING TO STREET. INLET PROTECTION MUST BE IN PLACE. 4\EDS ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION C NTROL PLAN 0 20 40 Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 SCALE IN FEET LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, YORK HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. PROPOSED HARDCOVER OF LOT 2. PROPOSED HOUSE 1,784 SQ. FT. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 666 SQ. FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 8,328 SQ. FT. PROPOSED HARDCOVER 29.4 % REFERENCE BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 833.84 (NAVD 88) MNDOT DISK "STERN". BL. 1 BUILDING SETBACKS ZONING: R1 = SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT HOUSE: FRONT = 30 FT SIDE = 10 FT (LOTS 75 FT OR GREATER) REAR=25 FT NUMBERED NOTES O O INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 0.INSTALL SWMP BOX NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. <>PLACE SOD AROUND THE HOUSE FROM FRONT CURB TO BACK OF THE HOUSE .O.TREE PROTECTION DEVICE MAR 0 9 2020 CITY OF LUNA ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: 1763) 545-2800 FAX: 1763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com DS 25 --r872.0 TW 870.0 BW 38.2 E. WOOD FENCE FENCE MEASURED DISTANCE zx PLATTED DISTANCE PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED DENOTES PROPOSED 854.1 411( -888- RAIN GARDEN DETAIL Sal 1...91 VSIIIIMA laST 11/414.1 NMI.° Mt IC111,0 .101 FLAME SCHEDULE MANE APPROWD JIM 01 MY. 2010 -A1- MY DONEE% RD3 23110 SAMPLE VEGETATION PLAN %ONO GV-ItG•010 20.3' MAY BE REQUIRED 1 BY DATE NO. DESCRIPTION FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 PROJECT NO.: 20-007 SHEET C5 DRAWN BY: IS CHECKED BY: VS 14" PEAT FILTER 30% PEAT NOSS 70% SAND 4" TOPSOIL/MULCH-A SUBSCIS • BERM ;••••;10 DRZTLEAPERADURE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN / 4"/ 0.42. 4 z 0 . 41 11., ...•1110 • IN ILINI< 1•0 iN1 •:0* 4 431g4)•PPIN z,V111,1110.ivOic WOOS. ' • %pogo tiktillastea .AV. . F 4' p 4; ,q - ,,,. Aril!•1:11e•..5311 . 471 11P, 47. A 4S°.f il '' ',1 . I 1•1 -1,t. '.#4 k..._..,..,,... • • ii , ....., ,.,€,...4,....,..,,,, 4, 'IR -c*4....ife,' .../ \ 'R. \ \ -F 9- \\ 1\ 9 \ 6'69 ¨\ 1\ 901 I \ ,?1 \ 90 0 k 11 u-i \ -/34,7 / / I ' k _k 6 ) 30 "A \- 16•5 g- " k...21.32. 54 \ 1878.61 107 79 001107. 9 PROPOSED ti HOUSE PAD `1-...- FFE=880.6 I TOB=879.1 ,1 LL=870.1 GAR=878.6 I 0 I - , - 1 ,1, 81..A Z RASUL PO . 3202824210022 9r. -,J 10 I 1 DitCK #7413 EXIS77NG HOUSE /7425 XISIING HOU FFE = 878.59 LL=870.16 /16.0 rs kv.,..vtrtgot 11 ASPEKT, LLC 1 PLO: 3202824310023 (-874- N. sik "- c3 0_ - I No -873.0 TW - B704 BYY - • DENOTES FOUND PROPERTY IRON DENOTES SET 1/2" X 18" REBAR WITH PLASTIC CAP "PLS 25105" 0 DENOTES CAST IRON MONUMENT 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET BOUNDARY LINE LOT LINE SETBACK LINE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Ca) EXISTING CONTOUR LINE Ei FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION gi CHAINLINK FENCE LEGEND EXISTING Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 DENOTES CONCRETE SURFACE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DENOTES ELECTRIC POWER POLE DENOTES DECIDUOUS TREE DENOTES CONIFEROUS TREE DENOTES SHRUB DENOTES TREE LINE DENOTES ELECTRIC METER DENOTES AIR CONDITIONER DENOTES SIGN/POST DENOTES GAS METER DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES FIRE HYDRANT O o DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES E x999.99 DENOTES 999 - -DENOTES FOUND 711?1. FFE DENOTES comPurED-c---0- DENOTES 0-- DENOTES 2 (M) DENOTES N 89°: (P) DENOTES \ GENERAL NOTES 1. SEE SWMP NOTES ON SHEET C5 FOR FURTHER SWMP REQUIREMENTS, IN CASE OF CONFLICT BETWEEN THIS PLAN AND SWMP NOTES, THE SWMP NOTES SHALL OVERRULE. 2. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE INITIAL STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ALL AREAS ALTERED HAVE BEEN RESTORED. 3. ALL REAR YARD AREAS OF LOTS AT SETBACK LINE ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF GRADING BY GRADING CONTRACTOR. ALL AREAS BETWEEN THE CURB AND SETBACK LINE ARE TO BE MULCHED AND SEEDED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF PRIVATE UTILITY INSTALLATION BY THE UTILITY CONTRACTOR. 4. STREET SWEEPING MUST BE UNDERTAKEN ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS. 5. PERFORM SEEDING FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF DISTURBED AREA AS FOLLOWS: a. REPLACE TOPSOIL TO PROVIDE A UNIFORM THICKNESS. LOOSEN TOPSOIL TO MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3". b. APPLY COMMERCIAL GRADE SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. c. INCORPORATE FERTILIZER INTO SOIL BY USE OF HARROW OR OTHER MEANS TO PLACE FERTILIZER BELOW GROUND LEVEL. d. APPLY Mn/DOT SEED MIXTURE 190 AT RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER ACRE WITH BRILLION TYPE SEEDER OR OTHER MEANS TO COVER SEED WITH i" TO i" OF SOIL. e. APPLY UNIFORM COVERING OF Mn/DOT TYPE 1 MULCH AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE. f. ANCHOR MULCH TO DEPTH OF 2" TO 3" WITH DISC ANCHOR OR OTHER MEANS IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING. NUMBERED NOTES <> INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. 0•INSTALL TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PRIOR TO START OF SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. <>INSTALL SWMP BOX NEAR THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. OPLACE SOD AROUND THE HOUSE FROM FRONT CURB TO BACK OF THE HOUSE 0•TREE PROTECTION DEVICE LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 9, YORK HILLS, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof. PROPOSED HARDCOVER OF LOT 2, BL. 1 PROPOSED HOUSE 1,784 SQ. FT. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 666 SQ. FT. TOTAL LOT AREA 8,328 SQ. FT. PROPOSED HARDCOVER 29.4 % REFERENCE BENCHMARK ELEVATION = 833.84 (NAVD 88) MNDOT DISK "STERN". BUILDING SETBACKS ZONING: R1 = SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT HOUSE: FRONT = 30 FT SIDE = 10 FT (LOTS 75 FT OR GREATER) REAR=25 FT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1 ./a?,/ 03/02/20 f lOSTING ARAGE 6'0 (1) p "36 - CH. PROFILE VIEW ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE SILT FENCE GRADE DRAINAGE FLOW CONTOURS PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 0 9 2020 CITY OF LI:DINA Storm Water Management Plan The work described to Implement the following Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) shall be considered part of the Contract Documents and shall be performed by the Contractor. The work to Install and maintain the Best Management Practices (BMP's) to prevent erosion and provide sediment control shall be in accordance with Permit No. MN R10000f and shall include, but are not necessarily be limited to, the requirements contained herein. 1. Construction Activity Information Description of the type and locations of BMP's appropriate for this site and sufficient to comply with all applicable requirements of the TMDL implementation plan and identification of the receiving water and of the areas of project site discharging to an Impaired water that has an approved TMDL implementation plan that contains requirements for construction Stormwater discharges: Not applicable to this project. Selection of Permanent Stormwater Management System 4. Sediment Control Practices Description of sediment control practices to be used to minimize sediments from entering surface waters, including curb and gutter systems and storm drain inlets: Permanent sediment control practices to be used on this project consist of sedimentation basins. Temporary sediment control practices to be used are silt fence, culvert Inlet protection, storm sewer inlet protection, stone pad exits, ditch checks, and, if necessary, street sweeping. Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Project Name: RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE DESIGN Project Address/Location: Section-Township-Range = 32-028-24 City/Township: City of EDINA State: MN Zip Code: 55435 County Parcel ID Number(s): 32-028-24-31-0022 All cities where construction will occur: City of EDINA All townships where construction will occur: Not Applicable All counties where construction will occur. HENNEPIN County Project Size (number of acres to be disturbed): 0.19 Project Type: x Residential _ Commercial/industrial _ Road Construction _ Other (describe) Cumulative Impervious Surface: Existing area of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre: 0.25 Post construction area of impervious surface to nearest quarter acre: 0.25 Receiving Waters: Name of Water Body Type Appendix A Special Water? No Dates of Construction Estimated Construction Start Date: June, 2020 Estimated Completion Date: August, 2020 Contact Information Owner of Project Site: BLAZ RASUL Business/Firm Name: - Federal Tax ID Number: available as needed State -Tax ID Number: available as needed Contact Person: BLAZ RASUL Title: Owner Phone: 952-215-6366 Mailing Address: 7425 York Ter. Sity: Edina State: MN Zip Code: 55435 Contractor (Party who will oversee implementation of the SWMP. May be same party as Owner above): BLAZ RASUL Business/Firm Name: - Federal Tax 10 Number- available as needed State Tax ID Number- available as needed Contact Person: BLAZ RASUL Title: Owner Phone: 952-215-6366 Mailing Address: 7425 York Ter. Sity: Edina State: MN Zip Code: 55435 General Construction Project Information Description of the construction activity (what will be built, general timefins., etc.). SINGLE FAMILY HOME CONSTRUCTION. The construction activities will Include grading operations for the construction of surface drainage and utilities. Roof drain sewer construction, exposed soil stabilization, and bituminous paving will follow grading operations. 2. General Site Information Description of the location and type of all temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to be used, Including the timing for installation and procedures used to establish additional temporary BMP 's as necessary. Contractor shall Install and maintain the temporary and permanent erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's as shown on the accompanying drawing and as described heroin. The timing shall be In accordance with the Construction Activity Sequence below and in accordance with sound and proactive construction scheduling and practices. Accompanying this SWMP Is a site plan that Includes the following features: • Existing and proposed grades, including dividing lines and direction of flow for all pre- and post-construction stormwater runoff drainage areas located within the project limits. Locations of Impervious surfaces and soil types. Locations of areas not to be disturbed. Method(s) to be used for final stabilization of al exposed soil areas. Description of stormwater mitigation measures required as the result of an environmental, archaeological, or other required local, state, or federal review of the project: Not applicable to this project. Will the project create a new cumulative impervious surface greater than or equal to one acre? _ Yes _ No If yes, a water quality volume of 1/2 inch of runoff from this area must be treated before leaving the site or entering surface waters (1 inch of runoff from this area if discharging to special waters). Method(s) to be used to treat runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project: — Wet sedimentation basin _X_Infiltration/Filtration basin — Regional ponds Combination of practices Description of treatment method(s) to be used, including design information for each method: Existing pond will be used to collect water fromo the roof. Description of why Itis not feasible to meet the treatment requirement for water quality volume. This can Include proximity to bedrock or road projects where the lack of right-of-way precludes the installation of any permanent stormwater management practices. Description of what other treatment, such as grassed swates, smaller ponds, or grit chambers, will be Implemented to treat runoff prior to discharge to surface waters: Not Applicable Description of how a proposed alternative method to treat runoff from new impervious surfaces will achieve approximately 80% removal of total suspended solids on an annual average basis: Not Applicable 3. Erosion Prevention Practices Description of construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices to be used to minimize erosion: Stage the soil disturbing activities to minimize the amount of disturbed soil prior to stabilization. Disturbed areas will be considered stabilized when covered with materials such as anchored mulch, staked sod, riprap, wood fiber blanket, or other materials that prevent erosion from occurring. Grass seeding alone will not be considered stabilization. Disturb only those areas where proposed contours and elevations are shown to differ from the existing and where removals and other operations are noted. Special areas of the project site that are not to be disturbed by construction activity are noted on the plan. Description of temporary erosion protection or permanent cover to be used for exposed positive slopes within 200 lineal feet of a surface water (stream, lake, pond, marsh, wetland, reservoir spring, river, storm water basin, storm water drainage system, waterways, water courses, and irrigation systems whether surface water is natural or artificial, public or private with maximum time an exposed soil area can remain exposed when the area is not actively being worked: Provide year round stabilization to the above mentioned areas in accordance with the following table: Maximum Exposure Duration When Area Steepness of slope (H:V) Is Not Actively Worked Greater than 3:1 7 Days 3:1 through 10:1 14 Days Less than 10:1 21 Days Description of practices to be used to stabilize the normal wetted perimeter of drainage or diversion ditches within 200 lineal feet of the property edge or point of discharge to a surface water within 24 hours of connecting the ditch to the surface water: Install seed, fertilizer, and disc-anchored mulch or temporary wood fiber blanket In ditches and swales within 24 hours of connecting the ditch or swale to the surface water where shown on the plan in accordance with the details. Description of other erosion prevention practices to be used: Install the specified energy dissipation method, such as riprap and geotextite fabric, at pipe outlets within 24 hours of installation. Permanently seed disturbed areas prior to end of seeding dates specified by MnDOT. 5. Dewatering and Basin Draining If the project includes dewatering or basin draining, describe the BMP's to be used to prevent the discharge from adversely affecting the receiving waters and downstream landowners. N/A 6. Additional BMP's for Special Waters and Discharges to Wetlands This project does not discharge stormwater directly to a Special Water. This project does not discharge stormwater directly to wetiands, exept roof drain 6" PVC. 7. Construction Activity Sequence In addition to performing and sequencing the tasks associated with implementing this SWMP as described herein and shown on the plan, the Contractor shall perform construction activities in accordance with the following sequence: (1) Install silt fence along property line of project site where shown on plan and when property line is down gradient and within 100 feet of areas to have disturbed soil and where property line is within 20 feet of soil disturbing and other construction activities. (2) Install silt fence along edge of wetlands and at other locations shown on the plan. (3) Install stone exit pads where shown on plan and at other locations where vehicles and equipment will leave the site onto paved and gravel surfaces. (4) Construct storm water ponds and related piping and control structures as shown on the project plans. Install and maintain temporary erosion prevention measures as shown on the plan. (5) Install silt fence along bottom of storm water pond inslopes and where shown on the plan. (6) Install trunk sanitary sewer. (7) Complete earthwork activities. Install and maintain sediment control measures such as ditch checks and stormwater inlet protection. (8) Complete utility construction. Install and maintain sediment control measures such as inlet protection as work proceeds. (9) Remove silt deposits from site, remove silt deposits from stormwater basins. (10) Provide soil stabilization to disturbed areas by preparing topsoil, seeding, fertilizing, mulching, anchoring mulch in accordance with plans and specifications. (11)Remove perimeter silt fence, other silt fence, check dams, and other sediment control measures upon achieving final stabilization and Owner submits the Notice of Termination. 8. Inspections and Maintenance Description of procedures to be taken to routinely inspect the construction site: Contractor shall inspect erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Repair, replace, or supplement non-functional BMP's to provide continually functional BMP's. Contractor shall inspect the entire construction site a minimum of once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Inspections shall include stabilized areas, erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's, and infiltration areas. Specific tasks associated with the inspection and maintenance of the BMP's include the following: • Maintain and retain at the construction site written records of the inspections and maintenance performed. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: Date and time of inspection/maintenance activity; Name of person(s) Performing the activity; Finding of Inspection; Recommended corrective actions; Corrective actions taken; and Date and amount of rainfall events greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. • Repair, replace, or supplement silt fences that become nonfunctional or accumulate sediment to the level of 1/3 the silt fence height or more within 24 hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. • Drain temporary and permanent sediment basins and remove sediment when the volume of sediment collected reaches 1/2 the permanent storage volume within 72 hours of discovery or as soon as conditions allow access. ' Inspect surface waters, drainage ditches, and stormwater conveyance systems for evidence of sediment deposited by erosion. Remove deltas and deposited sediment and restabilize areas where sediment removal results In exposed soil within seven (7) days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical constraints. Removal and stabilization shall be completed within seven (7) days of obtaining access. The NPDES/SDS permit holder Is responsible for contacting the local, regional, state, and federal authorities and receiving the applicable permits prior to performing this work. • Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations for evidence of sediment being tracked off-site onto paved surfaces. Remove tracked sediment from off-site paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. • Inspect perimeter of construction site. Remove off-site accumulations of sediment in a manner and at a frequency to minimize off-site impacts. 9. Pollution Prevention Management Measures Contractor shall implement the following pollution prevention management measures on the site: * Solid Waste: Collect and properly dispose of sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabrics, construction and demolition debris, and other wastes In accordance with MPCA disposal requirements. • Hazardous Materials: Properly store, provide required secondary containment, and dispose of oil products, fuels, point products, and other hazardous- substances to prevent spills, leaks, and other discharges in accordance with MPCA regulations. Provide restricted access storage areas to prevent unauthorized access and vandalism. • Equipment Washing: Restrict external washing of trucks and other construction equipment to a defined area of site. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing is prohibited on the property. ' Spill prevention: Park construction equipment and store potentially hazardous materials in a designated area located as far as practicable from potential environmentally sensitive areas. Construct impoundment dike and take other measures required to contain spilled material. Remove and dispose of contaminated soil, vegetation, and other materials and perform other mitigation measures as required in accordance with MPCA regulations. Sanitary and Septic Waste: Provide and maintain temporary facilities in accordance with MPCA and Minnesota Department of Health regulations. 10. Final Stabilization Contractor shall achieve final stabilization of the construction site by achieving the following: • Soil disturbing activities have been completed and soils are stabilized by a uniform perennial vegetative cover with a density of 70 percent over the entire pervious surface area or other equivalent means to prevent soil failure under erosive conditions. • Temporary synthetic and structural erosion prevention and sediment control BMP's are removed. • Sediment Is removed from permanent sedimentation basins to return basins to the design capacity, removed from stormwater conveyance systems, and is stabilized or removed from the site. 11. Notice of Termination Contractor shall notify Owner Immediately upon achieving Final Stabilization. Owner must submit the Notice of Termination within 30 days after Final Stabilization or within 30 days of another owner assuming control according to Part11.8.5. over all areas of the site that have not undergone Final Stabilization. PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 0 9 2020 CITY OF '"DINA ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545-2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: htip://edsmn.corn I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. JOB NAME: BLAZ RASUL FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01 /20 DRAWN BY: IS PROJECT NO.: 20-007 I / eGt_CI 't[V est 03/02/20 LOCATION: 7425 YORK TERRACE EDINA, MN 55435 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-13 CHECKED BY: VS SHEET C6 A PROPERTIES WITHIN 500 FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAR 0 9 2020 CITY OF .DINA Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin Cities Area 651-454-0002 MN. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET 19 18 #7405 2 #7404 17 #7409 #7408 Ifi #7415 #7 14 #7421 #74 0 14 #7427 #742 • 13 #7433 #74 2 12 F #7439 #7 38 ii 1.3 #7445 / P444 00 #3201 #75 15 #7509 ENGINEERING DESIGN & SURVEYING 6480 Wayzata Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55426 OFFICE: (763) 545-2800 FAX: (763) 545.2801 EMAIL: info@edsmn.com WEBSITE: http://edsmn.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 76,2c,-/ tc, Qsr DATED: 03/03/20 VLADIMIR SIVRIVER L.S. NO. 25105 FIELD WORK DATE: 02/01/20 FIELD BOOK NO.: EDS-7 DRAWN BY: DH CHECKED BY: VS JOB NO. 20-007 SHEET NO. 1 OF 1 #7400 #7404 13 #7401 1-; #7 405 #7408 #7434 #7438 11 #7409 #7429 #7433 #7413 10 4 #7412 #7430 su AVERAGE, MEAN, AND MEDIAN VALUES CALCULATED WITHIN A 500 FOOT RADIUS OF 7425 YORK TERRACE, EDINA, MN, 55435 NO. PROJECT NAME: BLAZ RAZUL PROJECT NUMBER: 20-007 PROPERTY OWNER STREET ADDRESS LOT NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT WIDTH FRONTAGE (FEET) LOT DEPTH (FEET) LOT AREA (ACRE) LOT AREA (SQFT) 1 M D Rohr-Robinson/C L Rohr 7400 Xerxes Ave S 1 LOT 1, YORK HILLS 73.81 132.86 0.23 9,803 2 S J Nelson & D J Nelson 7404 Xerxes Ave S 2 LOT 2, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.785 0.23 9,955 3 Janet Elizabeth Pearson 7408 Xerxes Ave S 3 LOT 3, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.715 0.23 9,950 4 Elizabeth Chase 7412 Xerxes Ave S 4 LOT 4, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.645 0.23 9,944 5 Chris K Kim & Mihwa Kim 7430 Xerxes Ave S 0 LOT 0, YORK HILLS 150.00 157.3 0.54 23,583 6 Peter Nels Millpointer Et Al 7434 Xerxes Ave S 5 LOT 5, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.43 0.23 9,928 7 James L Overholt 7438 Xerxes Ave S 6 LOT 6, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.355 0.23 9,922 8 M J Emmons & N Y Emmons 7433 York Ter 7 LOT 7, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.355 0.23 9,922 9 Thomas Kessler 7429 York Ter 8 LOT 8, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.43 0.23 9,927 10 Blaz Rasul 7425 York Ter 9 LOT 9, YORK HILLS 150.00 107.78 0.37 16,160 11 Aspekt LIc 7413 York Ter 10 LOT 10, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.43 0.23 9,944 12 Sundal Properties LIc 7409 York Ter 11 LOT 11, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.725 0.23 9,949 13 J P Meyer & S M Dreger 7405 York Ter 12 LOT 12, YORK HILLS 75.00 132.795 0.23 9,955 14 Karen Y Leffler 7401 York Ter 13 LOT 13, YORK HILLS 73.86 132.865 0.23 9,808 15 T R Mccarty & W A Mccarty 7404 Washburn Ave S 3 BLOCK 4, LOT 3, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 73.66 133.015 0.23 9,803 16 Amy L Gaston 7408 WASHBURN AVE S 4 BLOCK 4, LOT 4, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133.01 0.23 9,976 17 T B Hollen & B K Schumacher 7414 Washburn Ave S 5 BLOCK 4, LOT 5, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133.005 0.23 9,974 18 Camille Mielke 7420 Washburn Ave S 6 BLOCK 4, LOT 6, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133 0.23 9,971 19 0 L Dris & M R Dris 7426 Washburn Ave S 7 BLOCK 4, LOT 7, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.995 0.23 9,969 20 Dwayne Meier 7432 Washburn Ave S 8 BLOCK 4, LOT 8, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.99 0.23 9,966 21 Robert S Baltgalvis 7438 Washburn Ave S 9 BLOCK 4, LOT 9, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.985 0.23 9,964 22 Dennis Elwood 7444 Washburn Ave S 10 BLOCK 4, LOT 10, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.98 0.23 9,962 23 Breanna Jee Hegseth 7445 Xerxes Ave S 11 BLOCK 4, LOT 11, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.98 0.23 9,961 24 M Schaefer & C Schaefer 7439 Xerxes Ave S 12 BLOCK 4, LOT 12, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.985 0.23 9,963 25 Allison Kay Hudson 7433 Xerxes Ave S 13 BLOCK 4, LOT 13, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.99 0.23 9,966 26 Kyle David Thompson 7427 Xerxes Ave S 14 BLOCK 4, LOT 14, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.995 0.23 9,968 27 D J Kallis & B K Kallis 7421 Xerxes Ave S 15 BLOCK 4, LOT 15, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133 0.23 9,971 28 Ryan A Finkle 7415 Xerxes Ave S 16 BLOCK 4, LOT 16, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133.005 0.23 9,973 29 L A Koolmo & K C Koolmo Trs 7409 Xerxes Ave S 17 BLOCK 4, LOT 17, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 133.01 0.23 9,975 30 Corrissa C Schottmuller 7405 Xerxes Ave S 18 BLOCK 4, LOT 18, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 73.75 133.015 0.23 9,820 31 Mary S Melberg 3019 74th St W 19 BLOCK 4, LOT 19, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 130.00 90.045 0.27 11,708 32 Cameron Hufendick 7509 Xerxes Ave S 15 BLOCK 5, LOT 15, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 75.00 132.965 0.23 9,968 33 D A Mueller & P R Mcfadden 7501 Xerxes Ave S 16 BLOCK 5, LOT 16, PENN LAKE TERRACE 2ND ADDN 70.75 132.97 0.22 9,403 34 G & D Lau 7504 Xerxes Ave S 1 LOT 1, LYNDALE BUILDERS ADDN 100.00 97.86 0.22 9,781 35 Jacob Good/Rebecca Kelm-Good 3201 75th St W UNPLATTED 32 028 24 125.00 97.95 0.28 12,237 AVERAGE 82.74 130 0.24 10601 MEAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT 80.81 129 0.24 10417 MEDIAN 75 133 0.23 9962 MAR 0 9 MO CITY OF MINA Ilve old` N.%z QiEQle rI/ .,r ./ r_ // _t c ui2 ofvTiji Sec, 3.2, T, 26 ;e. 24 YORK HILLS KNOW AL Lo /Mf -N BY THESE- PRZ-GENTS; 7"haf lvsctc/r Cor/ton Inc, a //i/rnesofv Coraorwf/on, /acoroorVfeq' under AC /orvs OlIffianesofq, owners o`'fhe fo/%wi/P ve' scrl eq'/vrrerr to-w1l; The /yorfh 01071--h,711' <Nyz/ of fhe Eosy` Oise ha//' CE z) of r`he bvsf One hrt/>e Cf. yz) of fhe /i'orr`fieos` Qu4rfe- !/XE. rte) of fhe Soufhwesf QuQrfer CS. W. l) of Sect`/ort Th r f'o C3z), Towr sh7P 7,f fj e 9/if C28) EjQr pe rwen,e-four 62¢), exceo,' fho/porf f/ierwg1' 4;oOescr16Pq' Q.s /'7//O Ws; Goiawwcin Q file sou rriteorf corner wr'!/e mor//i one hQ/ o, ffie eel/ one -huff CE. ) ct/ the epr one-fro/` lEl2) of rtlr t iorr///eos fvarfer (A!4A) o1 -/4e sou/fiives1` Qvarfer <.5W ) o/` s4/4?0 secfiop Thiriy-fwo (W); thence vdr/h avoid the r`he evsl /ne 1ie7-eof'q di>l4g.-vee oIr One hur q'red- e/, / Y (1940) fePr` r`o 1`he oiwf cvr6e i/i i 0114e/q q' descri6eq r/ie ce weJ/4ad grw//e/ lo yh.a says/f /ge 01.5s471q' norW-fro/f Cf -A) of f/e eQ,rf oae/o/><<E.1z) of ffie evsf oise h4/f CE.W 0//he Ver/heorf va-irler of Me soa/if wei-I Qvarfer CSW. ) q dirfor7ce 0/Oae iu/"dred-rriae/y ua4' Three-feaf/s !/90.3 feef; ffierrce north/aar'?Mir i e o Dae hundreAvei. ` aso) aaro// / f sq 5, y line7fQef, fhe*ice e41r/4 is /Ice a`' One hunc/red-n/r efy onq' rhree-3 e,171&F (/90.3) 1 eel /o ffre e4rf /ane of sviv'Wor/if one of e4fr` awe- ha CE. ik) of fhe nor//iezrl FWrIer rlYF X) of hhe som1hwesl Qvor/er <S.W. fig); Mence Sov/%/ a/oltp sQic/ /4.f7///7e q d/sfq/tce of Otte hundreq fif t/50) fee/ fo Sao/nf of.e inn n. h'4re cavSeq'r'fie Qr, ove ore/r/ises fo /& r f//LLS" aog/ we hereh'v dedre4fe fo 1he/av6/rc, for Pv6l1c he .s014/' co)Porr/f/orz hats e tuseq' (here O'r'e-:re/7/`r r`o ,6e sea/ fo he gffixed fh/s /02A4 Qy of a Z2&-.- ,/95/. 5fQAe of/Yliaaeso7`4 Count{y 4{f/e77ae/o//L S. S. ofs 4.s .t%OK/r! On /'%i/s sheef daq' >/5 e -rgrwe Ir&OW,n as "YOR& yorev// sy`er.`/ui/4/:se o1e eon. '& 7`e.so>s%/%ony whereof, execvfed by ifs Pres/q/enr' oa./d /res Sec-re/a7 ar U' ifs cor7oor rfP FInlvresa//ce of ar CvsacY¢ , Car/son Irz c Ifs f r P/`esiy/e/t f Secre, e On f/st " !day/YoJf4ry dub//c, /n o d for fhe covnf ofHenrte or s Ylinnesof4 persona/y QioPe4req GY/ri. ff-CuSQc% a/7d Chers. W;eoo?4 4rr/Q'.740 rrre/verso/ry/fy X-oaw, who's ,bey jr,be/nom 4'vf'sWDy2SAth4fTheyqreYes/aecfive fhe 471/9' fh e 5ecre"07 of fhe c or/vorofioh 7o/Weq' A? ffie f"ore9oirr /nsfrv en /4 qnq' /1141` fhe .scq/ a.>r./ixeq' /o sviq' insfru"e-171 /s Me corPor4J'e se4/ of/ sgrd e4v:Pdrp/iol gild /hof s4id /ns7rrvlrrea/ w4s -5/'req/ or o, 5e4/eq' //I he/r411' o/ s4io' cor on>ic v .6y vv y`ori y of ifs Boors/ d .Pirecfors anq' `l'm ,8 lvsvc. giro' eras LY. Woof /rc.Fao.Y/e<'eeq' /d tds1rurnehf fo he lh free crcf o/nd o'e ; of s41d core r4fiov. tYot1`ar /'aL ic f/er7//eoia for m, aireso/rt, — 54p{e of mloneso/aS S. Cevnfy o//i'emntplr? J I hereby cerfify fh4f I hove surveyed fhe AwQ/ descri6eq' /'O' Me v'ed c4/ioh oa fh/s sheet s/hvf ff/el'or`hereon s a correch svrYey, yho/4// disf4aces 'we correcrr/y .rh4wv on "Io'p/of /h4714// /o fs are /r/ ,pro ressrvc atzor6erf qs shown on sotq'P/of 'haf fhe gliwc/tsions cy'4// /ofr and fhe wlq'fh af4//s/reefs are correct/y-Thowl/ crud decl.-wa/s of Q foot fhti f ff/e rrroirvmerfs for /yie 9vt4'4/9ce of fvfvre surveys have .6ee/7 /a/ocev' /a Me frown v' as 117471ca/`e vors sQidra/v1; ffrr f r`/re fgao9ro'ahy afrfie 4119' /s correcl/%y sfiotun/fhof /`he ovfsiq'e hovndary Imes are coreecfy o'esi9ir,/eq' or/ so/q'`afof /h40'11hrere are yio we f /a rrds or ovb/ic h/9hwt? r lo be c'esifaa/'eq/ oft so/q'/a/af oflrer fha,*7 /s r`hereor! s/iowh. Svbscr f eq' alrq'swarm ,before -We 4z Nofar- Pv6/icy /1r anq/ for fhe covey of/f/ertrte/vtn /ylihneso`Q fh s /a of. c u V _/951. e Yl'gr Pu6/icl fi noe/vra lova /ylinn. _r . Q,,r 1ny Co rmission e,foires f / 10 - / 95 d? Jdhd A. Kundert, Wtary public, Henrnapld zoui* li" MY CadmiSSW Expires April 10, 195S Thi X0/97{ cr/oOrove q/ .6y ,tile of c A-e /9S/ v'(f/49e Covnc// o/ /the vt//stye of At'Vinq IWinrresolr/ ars` -7 r egv/or meet/,7 he/d /'fre q'vy Yt//Qpe of Edinq 1Wianesof4, by tfs, ecorq'eY : • The CITY of EDINA History of Similar Requests EdinaMN.gov 1 2&6 3 4 7&9 8 5 1 Approved 10 11 12 15 14 Date: April 29, 2020 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P arking S tall Varianc e and R evis ed F inal Development P lan, 4500 F ranc e for O rion Investments Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil deny the request. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he applicant, O rion I nvestments is requesting a parking stall variance and an amendment to their approved final development plan (site plan) to increase the seating capacity of the approved restaurant that is currently under construction. On F ebruary 12, 2020, the P lanning C ommission considered the request and recommended the C ity C ouncil deny the proposal. Vote: 6 Ayes and 2 N ays. T he original request was to increase the number of seats from 35 to 110 in the new development under construction at 4500 F rance Avenue. T he approved restaurant space in the 2018 approved plan was 3,587 square feet in size, with two retail spaces being 2,960 square feet in size. T he proposed new restaurant space would increase to 3,731 square feet, while the retail space would decrease to 2,680 square feet T he applicant requested the City Council continue their consideration of the original request from M arch 4th to M ay 5th, to allow time to work with the residential neighborhood and adjacent commercial property owners on a revised plan. On M arch 9th, the applicant held an Open H ouse to discuss the project. As a result, the applicant has made the following changes to their request: R educed the restaurant size from 110 seats to 100 seats. Offers parking availability on the following sites: T he Masonic Lodge, 12 surface parking stalls immediately across F rance Avenue: 44th S treet Dental, 24 surface parking stalls one block north, accessed via the public easement connecting Sunnyside Ave and 44th Street; D P Hue, 5 surface parking stalls one block northeast. (See attached M ap) R estaurant patrons would be directed to use the additional parking stalls via the restaurant website, directional maps provided at the hostess stand, using signage within the public parking area, and through the neighborhood association communication channels. T he restaurant workforce, which would not exceed ten employees, would be instructed to walk, use ride share or public transportation, reducing area parking demands. Orion agrees to fund the construction of a crosswalk at the western boundary of T he L orient, across S unnyside (as determined by staff) not to exceed $7,500. O rion will re-design the parking entrance to eliminate the left-out turn from the public parking area. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Engineering Memo Location Maps Revised Parking and Traffic Study - April 20 Applicant Narrative Adjacent Off-Street Parking Opportunities Applicant's Area Restaurant Parking to Seat Study Applicant's 44th & France Parking Availability Study 2018 Floor Plan Proposed Floor Plan Previous Staff Report from February 12, 2020 PC Meeting Enginnering Memo from February 12, 2020 PC Meeting 2018 City Council Minutes 2018 Planning Commis s ion Minutes Resolution Approving the Development (2018) Spack Parking & Traffic Study - Feb. 5 April 29, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Parking Stall Variance and Revised Final development plan for 4500 France Avenue. Information / Background: The applicant, Orion Investments is requesting a parking stall variance and an amendment to their approved final development plan (site plan) to increase the seating capacity of the approved restaurant that is currently under construction. On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission considered the request and recommended the City Council deny the proposal. Vote: 6 Ayes and 2 Nays. (See attached staff report from the February 12th meeting.) The original request was to increase the number of seats from 35 to 110 in the new development under construction at 4500 France Avenue. The approved restaurant space in the 2018 approved plan was 3,587 square feet in size, with two retail spaces being 2,960 square feet in size. The proposed new restaurant space would increase to 3,731 square feet, while the retail space would decrease to 2,680 square feet The applicant requested the City Council continue their consideration of the original request from March 4th to May 5th, to allow time to work with the residential neighborhood and adjacent commercial property owners on a revised plan. On March 9th, the applicant held an Open House to discuss the project. As a result, the applicant has made the following changes to their request: • Reduced the restaurant size from 110 seats to 100 seats. • Offers parking availability on the following sites: The Masonic Lodge, 12 surface parking stalls immediately across France Avenue: 44th Street Dental, 24 surface parking stalls one block north, accessed via the public easement connecting Sunnyside Ave and 44th Street; DP Hue, 5 surface parking stalls one block northeast. (See attached Map) • Restaurant patrons would be directed to use the additional parking stalls via the restaurant website, directional maps provided at the hostess stand, using signage within the public parking area, and through the neighborhood association communication channels. STAFF REPORT Page 2 • The restaurant workforce, which would not exceed ten employees, would be instructed to walk, use ride share or public transportation, reducing area parking demands. • Orion agrees to fund the construction of a crosswalk at the western boundary of The Lorient, across Sunnyside (as determined by staff) not to exceed $7,500. • Orion will re-design the parking entrance to eliminate the left-out turn from the public parking area. The project currently under construction will have 45 units of housing, an enclosed surface parking lot with 39 stalls, and underground parking containing 71 stalls. Three of the 39 stalls are designated for resident parking; therefore, 36 stalls are available for the retail and restaurant. The surface parking lot has a public parking easement over it, to allow retail customers in the 44th and France district to also parking on site. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The access road off of France is on the adjacent property to the south, which is owned by the applicant. The specific request is as follows: • A parking stall variance from 61 spaces required to 36 proposed, and an amendment to the approved final development plan (site plan) at 4500 France Avenue. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Retail uses; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Easterly: Retail uses in the City of Minneapolis. Southerly: Retail & Office uses; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Westerly: Single-Family homes; zoned R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is one acre in size, and a mixed-use retail and housing structure is under construction. Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node. Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development STAFF REPORT Page 3 Parking Under the approved PUD, the parking calculations were based on Section 36-1311 of the City Code. As demonstrated below, a total of 61 parking stall would be required for the retail space and 100 seat restaurant. (see table below). The proposed plans would provide 36 parking stalls on the site. The applicant also owns the property to the south and would make available 15 stalls when the business on that site are closed to make up for some of the shortage. The applicant has also secured verbal agreements with the following properties to provide off-street spaces: • The Masonic Lodge, 12 surface parking stalls immediately across France Avenue. • 44th Street Dental, 24 surface parking stalls one block north, accessed via the public easement connecting Sunnyside Ave and 44th Street. • DP Hue, 5 surface parking stalls one block northeast. (See attached Map) There are no long-term binding agreements that would allow this parking for the restaurant. Therefore, staff would have significant concern if these properties cut off the availability of the spaces in the future. Staff is also concerned about customers knowing how to get to these nearby parking lots. Customers may opt to just park on the street instead of finding a parking lot that may be further away. Spack Solutions conducted a revised parking study based on the revised plans and concludes that even with the 15 available stalls during the peak operation of the restaurant, there would still be two (2) weekdays each week in the evening, when there would not be adequate off- street parking. (See attached study.) Engineering staff has reviewed the Spack Consulting parking study and provided a memo regarding the conclusions of that assessment. (See attached memo.) Code Requirement Proposed 2,680 s.f. retail spaces = 18 spaces (8 spaces for the 1st 1,000 s.f. 6 spaces per each additional 1,000 s.f.) 100 seat restaurant = 43 spaces (1 space per 3 seats + 1 space per employee on a maximum shift {10 employees}) Total = 61 spaces required 36 enclosed spaces proposed* *Variance and amended final development plan required STAFF REPORT Page 4 Final Development Plan Amendment The approved final development plan for this development, limited the restaurant seating to 35. (See attached city council minutes.) Therefore, the final development plan approval as part of the rezoning requires an amendment. (See attached 2018 resolution that approved the final development plan.) Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access points to the proposed development would not be altered. Access would be off France and Sunnyside. Orion has offered to re-design the parking entrance off Sunnyside to eliminate the left-out turn from the public parking area. This was a concern of the neighborhood during previous reviews of this project. Spack Solutions conducted a traffic and parking study which concludes that existing roadways would still support the project and the additional restaurant size. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted. (See attached study.) 44th & France Small Area Plan Guiding Principle 7: Parking Parking should be hidden from view behind or beneath buildings on the west side of France Avenue. The large parking lot with multiple owners between Sunnyside and 44th Street should be reimagined as a "community parking facility" 5 that accommodates parking for the study area (district). This community parking facility should be designed to double as gathering space and should have the flexibility to change over time, as other modes of transportation, such as ride- sharing, become more common and fewer parking spaces are needed. While district parking is contemplated in the 44th and France SAP, it has not yet been constructed. The proposed plan to increase the size of the restaurant would cause an increase to visible parking within the area. Parking Stall Variance As shown above, a parking variance from 61 spaces required to 36 is required. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any STAFF REPORT Page 5 reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. There is no practical difficulty in this instance. The applicant was approved for a project that allowed for restaurant for a maximum seating capacity of 35. The practical difficulty is caused by the applicant’s desire for additional seating. Without long-term binding agreements, staff cannot consider the off-street parking stalls in the parking requirements for the site. These property owners could decide to not allow the stalls to be used at any time. Also, as mentioned, customers may opt to park on adjacent streets rather than finding a parking lot further away. Customers may not even know adjacent parking lots are available. The Spack Solutions parking study concluded that the off-street parking (36 on-site spaces, evening use of 15 spaces from the property to the south) would not be enough to satisfy the shortage. (See attached parking study.) The study concludes that two (2) weekdays each week there would be a parking shortage. During these times, parking would then spill out onto adjacent streets. While there may be adequate parking available on adjacent streets, the city has not considered on street parking to satisfy off street parking requirements or as justification for variances. The Spack Solutions study does conclude that the off-street parking provided from other nearby sites would provide adequate off-street parking. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? No. There are no unique circumstances. As mentioned above, the applicant was approved for a 35-seat maximum restaurant. The circumstances of being short parked are caused by the applicant’s desire for a larger restaurant; therefore, are self-created. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. Additional interior restaurant seats would not alter the character of the neighborhood. On street parking is an allowed use on adjacent streets. However, the increase in on-street parking could be interpreted as impacting the character of the single-family residential district to the west, if on-street parking extends into the area where single-family homes are located. Should the nearby off-street parking stalls available for the restaurant be utilized, staff would find that the character of the neighborhood would not be impacted. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Options for Consideration & Recommendation As noted above in the variance review, staff is recommending denial of the request. Below provide options for the planning commission and city council to consider: Approval Recommend the City Council approve the parking stall variance from 61 spaces to 36 and final development plan revision to expand the allowable restaurant seating from 35 seats to 100. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Parking would be accommodated by the existing 36 on-site parking stalls, the 15-stalls on the property to the south when needed, adjacent on-street parking, and adjacent sites including the Lake Harriet Mason Lodge (12 stalls), DP Hue building (4 stalls) and the 44th Street dental building (24 stalls). 2. The site is located on a bus route; the project is pedestrian friendly with expanded sidewalks and bicycle park available. Employees would be encouraged to use these alternative modes of transportation. The applicant must make efforts to implement Travel Demand Management strategies to encourage alternative modes of transportation and reduce the impact of motor vehicles (consistent with the 44th & France Small Area Plan and the transportation goals in the Comprehensive Plan). These strategies may include: i. Providing secure bicycle parking in well-lit, convenient areas near key entrances ii. Providing on-site bicycle repair station iii. Providing directional signage for locating transportation amenities (bus stops, bicycle parking, etc.) iv. Designating 5% of parking spaces for electric vehicles, carpool or vanpool v. Subsidizing transit passes for tenants/employees (Metro Transit’s future E-Line bus rapid transit service, which will operate between the Southdale Transit Center and the University of Minnesota, will likely have stations at 44th and France) vi. Distributing information to all new and existing tenants/employees annually (bike maps, transit info, rideshare mapping applications) 3. The parking study done by Spack Solutions concludes that there would be an adequate on- street parking supply using existing 36 on-site parking stalls, the 15-stalls on the property to the south, adjacent on-street parking, and adjacent sites including the Lake Harriet Mason Lodge (12 stalls), DP Hue building (4 stalls) and the 44th Street dental building (24 stalls) for a 100-seat restaurant. 4. Proper signage would adequately direct customers to the restaurant from adjacent parking lots. STAFF REPORT Page 7 5. The on-site commercial parking is available to users of other commercial properties in the 44th and France District. The Spack Solutions study further concludes that any non-site vehicles that would utilize this parking area are currently parking on-street in the area. Therefore, the net change to on-street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development. 6. Eliminated the left out vehicular movement and the pedestrian crossing enhancements will positively improve pedestrian safety in the area. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan is revised to allow a 100-seat restaurant. 2. The continuation of the provision of adjacent off-street parking stalls to cover the shortage of on-site parking at 4500 France. 3. Signage must be installed in the on-site parking lot to direct restaurant patrons to use the additional parking available in adjacent parking off-street parking lots. The restaurant shall post on its website directional maps to available parking lots and provide maps at the hostess stand, and through the neighborhood association communication channels. 4. Orion shall fund the construction of a crosswalk across Sunnyside (as determined by staff) not to exceed $7,500. 5. Orion will re-design the parking entrance to eliminate the left-out turn from the public parking area. 6. Employees shall be instructed to park off-site. 7. The applicant shall submit a Travel Demand Management (TDM) Plan subject to staff approval. The Plan shall incorporate some of the recommendations in the findings above. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the parking stall variance from 61 spaces to 36 and final development plan revision to expand the allowable restaurant seating from 35 seats to 100. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. There is no practical difficulty in this instance. The applicant was approved for a project that allowed for restaurant for a maximum seating capacity of 35. 2. The practical difficulty is caused by the applicant’s desire for additional seating. 3. Reasonable use exists on the site with the development that was originally approved. STAFF REPORT Page 8 4. Spack Solutions performed a parking study and concluded that the off-street parking would not be enough to satisfy the shortage. Two (2) weekdays there would be a parking shortage in the evening. During these times, parking would then spill out onto adjacent streets, even though fifteen (15) parking stalls would be made available on the applicant’s property to the south. 5. There are no long-term binding agreements with any of the nearby off-street parking lots for provision of permanent parking stalls. 6. There may be adequate parking available on adjacent streets, however, the city has not considered on-street parking to satisfy off street parking requirements or as justification for variances. 7. On-street parking could extend into the adjacent single-family residential area to the west, which could negatively impact the character of the neighborhood. 8. The 36 stalls within the subject development are designated as district parking for the 44th and France District. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial subject to the findings listed in the denial option above. Deadline for a city decision: May 19, 2020 Date: April 22, 2020 To: 4500 France Ave, Owner and Development Team Cc: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, P.E. – Director of Engineering From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 4500 France Avenue – Parking Stall Variance Orion Investments is requesting a parking stall variance to increase the seating capacity of an approved restaurant from 35 seats to 100 seats for a mixed-use redevelopment under construction at 4500 France Avenue. The original site plan, approved in 2018, included 46 residential units, a 3,600 square foot restaurant and 2,960 square feet of retail. This memo will outline my response to the narrative submitted by the applicant. Off-Street Parking Agreements with Other Properties Spack Solutions completed a parking assessment for this project on behalf of the City to compare the proposed parking supply to the anticipated demand for the site. The commercial parking supply on site is 36 stalls, which will be placed in a public parking easement and available for drivers traveling to other sites in the 44th and France commercial district. Spack’s assessment showed that the proposed increase to the restaurant size would exceed on-site capacity for two hours on weekday evenings and three hours on Friday and Saturday evenings. At these times, the number of vehicles needing to park off-site varies between one and 17. While the applicant states that Spack “is in support of our parking plan,” their assessment concluded that the commercial demand can be accommodated if three components are considered: 1. 36 on-site parking stalls 2. 15 parking stalls at Edina Gateway (4528 France Avenue) 3. Available on-street parking on Sunnyside Road and France Avenue To address resident concerns that overflow parking will spill onto Sunnyside Road, the adjacent residential street, Orion claims to have secured parking agreements with four nearby properties: - Edina Gateway (4528 France Avenue), 15 surface stalls (currently owned by Orion Investments) - The Masonic Lodge (4519 France Avenue), 12 surface stalls - 44th Street Dental (3925 West 44th Street), 24 surface stalls - DP Hue (4405 France Ave), 4 surface stalls The attached graphic shows the location of these four properties relative to 4500 France Avenue. According to the applicant, restaurant patrons will be directed to use one of these additional 55 parking stalls when the respective businesses are not open. Though Orion has clearly made an effort to maximize the use of existing surface lots, there is no public parking easement over them to guarantee that they remain available in the future. The fact remains that Spack’s assessment indicates that approving the parking stall variance would result in more vehicle demand than can be handled on-site. Pedestrian Safety Improvements Orion has offered to contribute up to $7,500 to fund the installation of a crosswalk on Sunnyside Road at the western boundary of the Lorient site (see attached graphic). The location would not meet the City’s standards for a mid-block crossing because of its proximity to the existing crosswalk at France Avenue. Additionally, a crossing at this location would better serve visitors parking on Sunnyside Road than those parking at any of the four aforementioned properties with parking agreements. The applicant has also offered to redesign the driveway entrance off Sunnyside Road to eliminate the left-turn exit from the public parking area. Many residents have requested the elimination of this movement since the project was initially proposed, and this change could redirect overflow parking from Sunnyside Road to France Avenue or one of the four properties with parking agreements. Encouraging Alternate Modes of Transportation While it is true that the estimated vehicle demands do not account for those who may walk, bike or take transit to the site, it is difficult to accurately estimate the impact of these modes. Orion states that “The Lorient was designed to encourage pedestrian access and public transit,” noting the development is located near Metro Transit bus stops and will include bicycle parking at the street level and within the underground parking garage. Both of these are examples of how the applicant has implemented Travel Demand Management strategies into their project. Orion also explains that restaurant employees will be “instructed to walk, use ride share or public transportation” to further reduce parking demand. Though this is a good start, a stronger strategy to consider would be to subsidize transit passes or ride share expenses for employees. The applicant also mentioned Metro Transit’s E Line bus rapid transit (BRT) service, which will operate between the Southdale Transit Center and the University of Minnesota starting as early as 2024. While the applicant’s narrative describes this service as providing “additional accessibility to public transportation,” it will actually replace the existing Route 6 bus service along France Avenue adjacent to the project site with faster, more frequent service. Attachment: 4500 France Parking Stall Variance Graphic FRANCE AVEW 4 4 T H S T SUNNYSIDE RDW 45TH ST The Lorient36 commercial parking stalls Edina Gateway15 parking stalls The Masonic Lodge12 parking stalls 4 4 th S tre e t D e n ta l2 4 p a rk in g s ta lls DP Hue4parking stalls / Engineering Dept April 2020 The Lorient4500 France AvenueParking Stall VarianceCITYOFEDINAMI N NESOTAINCORPO R A T E D 18 8 8 , e U U Publicalley Legend Existing Sidewalk Existing Crosswalk Proposed Crosswalk 4500 France Ave Proposed Parking Agreement U Existing Transit Stop Technical Memorandum To: Cary Teague, City of Edina From: Max Moreland, PE, PTOE Date: April 20, 2020 Re: Parking Assessment – 4500 France Avenue Purpose of Report and Study Objectives A new development known as The Lorient is being constructed at 4500 France Avenue on the southwest corner of the France Avenue and Sunnyside Road intersection in Edina, Minnesota. This technical memorandum presents an analysis of the proposed parking supply, updated with the most recent off-street parking numbers, for the site as compared to the anticipated parking demand for the site. Conclusions The proposed off-street parking stalls for the residential portion of the site are anticipated to accommodate the peak residential demand. Supplemental parking agreements and general off- street parking availability are also present to reduce and potentially eliminate on -street parking needs. The 36 commercial parking spaces in conjunction with the 15 spaces from the adjacent development will accommodate the parking demand for the commercial portion of the site at all times with the exception of two hours per weekday. Those times are: • 6:00 p.m. on a weekday with an overflow parking demand of nine spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a weekday with an overflow parking demand of two spaces The Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge (12 parking stalls), DP Hue building (4 parking stalls), and 44 th Street Dental building (24 parking stalls) provide up to 40 more parking stalls that can be utilized after 5:00 p.m. most days of the week. This additional capacity fulfills the parking demand for the two hours discussed above without the use of any on-street parking facilities. An additional 36 on-street parking stalls are also present surrounding the site at locations that would not impact the ability of single-family homeowners from parking in front of their homes as well. The commercial parking spaces provided for this development will also be open to general public parking for the area. Any non-site vehicles that would utilize this parking area are currently parking on-street in the area. Therefore, the net change to on -street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development. Spack Solutions 2 of 6 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Development Characteristics The development will include a mix of 46 apartment units, 2,700 square feet of retail and a 3,700 square foot, 100 seat restaurant. There will be two vehicle access points to the site; one on Sunnyside Road and one on France Avenue. Parking Supply There are 113 vehicle parking stalls proposed for the site; 71 standard spaces plus three tandem spaces below grade for residential use and 36 at grade for commercial/public use. The owner of this development also owns the property directly to the south at 4528 -4530 France Avenue. This includes a bank, a dry cleaner and two retail spaces. These businesses are not open after 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, 6:00 p.m. on Fridays and 7:00 p.m. on other weekdays. The parking spaces for these businesses will be able to be used as overflow parking for the 4500 France Avenue development in the evening hours. There are 15 parking spaces available as overflow parking with direct access from 4500 France Avenue. The owner has also reached out to other property owners surrounding the site. This includes: • The Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge. Located on the east side of France Avenue, and just south of the proposed development, the Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge has 12 available parking stalls on site. The Masonic Lodge has been very accommodating allowing construction vehicle storage on-site for the last 12-months, and though they will not complete a parking agreement with The Lorient ownership, they have vocalized that they want to help the surrounding development area and will offer their available and open parking to help support area businesses. With events only being held at this location Monday and Thursday nights, as well as the second Wednesday night of each month additional parking capacity is present at this location most nights of the week and all weekends. • 44th Street Dental. This development is a roughly 1/8 of a mile walk from The Lorient based on the existing pedestrian infrastructure. A parking agreement is in the works with the owner providing access to these 24 parking stalls between 5:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. Monday through Sunday. • DP Hue. This development is less than 500-feet away from The Lorient development. A parking agreement is currently being negotiated with the owner and would provide an additional 4 parking stalls for use. Currently this business operates until 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, 5:00 p.m. on Saturday, and is closed on Sundays. These additional businesses would add 40 available parking stalls for The Lorient. 16 off-street parking spots would be located within 500 -feet of the development with an additional 24 stalls within approximately 1/8 of a mile of the site. On-street parking is also available in the area. Directly adjacent to the site there are seven spaces along the south side of Sunnyside Road. Parking is also available on the north side of Sunnyside Road with approximately nine spaces and on the east side of France Avenue with approximately Spack Solutions 3 of 6 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment 20 spaces between 45th Street and 46th Street. These parking spaces are located adjacent to business and would not impact single family home residents from parking along the roadway in front of their homes. Additional on-street parking is also available on 45th Street near the site. Based on this review a total of 168 off-street parking stalls are available for the new development with additional on-street parking available nearby. City Parking Requirements The minimum parking requirements per the City of Edina’s Code of Ordinances for planned commercial districts are listed in Table 1. Table 1 – City of Edina Parking Requirements Building Unit Description Parking Requirement* Required Spaces Multi-residential 41 Units (less than 1,500 square feet) 1 enclosed space per unit 41 Multi-residential 5 Units (greater than 1,500 square feet) 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit 8 Non-Shopping Center Retail 2,700 square feet 8 spaces for the first 1,000 square feet plus 6 spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet up to 15,000 square feet 18 Restaurant 100 Seats 1 space per 3 seats plus 1 space per employee on a maximum shift (10 employees assumed) 43 TOTAL 110 With 77 residential parking spaces proposed, the residential portion of the site will meet City of Edina parking requirements while the 36 commercial parking spaces proposed will be short of City minimums. Parking Demand - ITE The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) provides the Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, a compilation of parking demand data for various land uses from existing developments throughout the United States. This national standard provides a basis to forecast parking demand for new developments. Table 2 shows the peak parking demand on a weekday and a Saturday for each portion of the development based on the ITE forecasts. Spack Solutions 4 of 6 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Table 2 – Forecast Parking Generation Based on ITE Building Unit Land Use Description ITE Code Development Parking Demand Weekday Friday Saturday Residential Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 52 Units ITE 221 60 60 47 Retail Shopping Center 2,700 square feet ITE 820 5 7 8 Restaurant Quality Restaurant 100 Seats ITE 931 52 47 46 It is unlikely these different land uses will experience their peak parking demand at the same time. To determine the total parking demand on site during different times, a time-of-day analysis was completed. Using data collected at various land uses by Spack Solutions, the percentage of the peak parking demand can be found for each hour over the course of a day for each of the three land uses. Hourly results of the time-of-day parking analysis are attached. This analysis forecasts that the peak parking demand for the entire site for a weekday, Friday and Saturday will be: • 86 vehicles on a weekday at 7:00 p.m. • 77 vehicles on a Friday at 7:00 p.m. • 61 vehicles on a Saturday at 7:00 p.m. Focusing just on the commercial portion of the site (since there is adequate parking for the residential portion), the time-of-day parking analysis forecasts the peak parking demand for the retail and restaurant use will be: • 53 vehicles on a weekday at 7:00 p.m. • 48 vehicles on a Friday at 7:00 p.m. • 51 vehicles on a Saturday at 7:00 p.m. It is noted that these demands have not been adjusted to account for those walking bicycling or taking transit to the site. Nearby transit is available and bicycle parking facilitie s will be included on site. This may result in a lower parking demand for the site. Parking Supply vs Demand Based on the forecasts shown in Table 2, the residential portion of the site will be able to accommodate the proposed parking demand with the residential spaces supplied. With 36 parking spaces available for commercial use on site plus an additional 15 spaces available with direct access from The Lorient site, in the evenings when the adjacent development is closed for business (after 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, 6:00 p.m. on Fridays and 7:00 p.m. on other weekdays), there is enough off-street parking to accommodate nearly all of the commercial demand for the site. Utilizing the time-of-day parking demands along with the off-street supply, there are two hours on a weekday in which it is anticipated the demand will exceed supply causing the need for additional parking. Those times and demands are: Spack Solutions 5 of 6 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment • 6:00 p.m. on a weekday with an overflow parking demand of nine spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a weekday with an overflow parking demand of two spaces Based on these numbers, the available 12 parking stalls located in the Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge provide enough additional capacity for the overflow parking demand. If a Masonic event is occurring, or some of these stalls are in use by other developments, the four stalls in the DP Hue lot (less than 500 feet away) and 24 stalls in the 44 th Street Dental parking lot (roughly 1/8 of a mile away) provide additional sufficient overflow and are currently in the process of completing parking agreements with The Lorient’s ownership . Charts showing the time of day parking demand for this site along with the available off-street parking supplies are attached. To keep the on-site parking as available as possible for site visitors, it is recommended that employees park off-site at either the Lake Harriet Mason Lodge, DP Hue or 44th Street Dental. Additionally, the on-street parking supply of 36 spaces on Sunnyside Road and France Avenue adjacent to the site is anticipated to be able to accommodate any on-street parking demand from this development without causing a significant strain to the areas on-street parking facilities or impacting single family residences from parking in front of their homes. There will be a public parking easement for the 36 commercial parking spaces for this development. This means drivers destined for surrounding uses can also park at this site. Without a current public parking area at this site, it can be assumed any future non-site vehicles parking here are currently utilizing on-street parking in the area. Therefore, if this commercial parking area becomes full due to existing on-street parking vehicles now parking in the lot, the net change to on-street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development, which is relatively low. Site Comparison This site will be providing 36 to 51 off-street parking spaces for commercial use. Accounting for the retail parking demand of the site, that leaves 28 to 51 parking spaces on site for restaurant use at any time. Similar restaurants in the area are considered as a comparison of how much off- street parking is provided. In Edina, restaurants such as Edina Grill, Salut and Cocina Del Barrio utilize large amounts of shared public district parking provided in the 50th & France area. That type of parking is common in many of the commercial areas with restaurants throughout the City but is not currently available near 4500 France Avenue. Nearby in Minneapolis, Martina (142 seats) has 25 off-street parking spaces, Red Cow (135 seats) has 10 off-street parking spaces, and Coalition (107 seats) has 42 off-street parking spaces. The proposed development has a higher number of off-street parking spaces proposed than these other similar restaurants and is proposing 100 seats. Spack Solutions 6 of 6 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Traffic Study Impacts A 2018 traffic impact study was conducted for this development by Spack Solutions. In that study, the trip generation for the site was analyzed with the restaurant portion of the site being a 3,700 square foot restaurant. With the up dated proposed size of the site being 100 seats, the trip generation for the restaurant portion of the site was re-analyzed. Table 3 shows the previous trip generation forecasts for the restaurant along with the current forecasts. Table 3 – Restaurant Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Code - Source Land Use Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 932 – ITE High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (3,700 square feet) 103 103 10 8 11 7 932 - ITE High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (100 seats) 108 108 12 11 12 9 Difference 5 5 2 3 1 2 As shown in Table 3, the difference between trip generation forecasts for a 3,700 square foot restaurant and 100 seat restaurant are rather small with the difference being five vehicles or less in a peak hour, or one vehicle roughly every 12 minutes. The 2018 traffic study showed acceptable intersection operations in the study area without any study intersections being on the edge of acceptability. Therefore, this change to the proposed site is not anticipated to significantly impact the results of the 2018 traffic study. Attachments • Time of Day Parking Demand • Time of Day Commercial Parking Demand and Supply Charts 12:00 AM 57 0 5 62 5 36 0 1:00 AM 58 0 2 60 2 36 0 2:00 AM 58 0 1 59 1 36 0 3:00 AM 59 0 0 59 0 36 0 4:00 AM 60 0 0 60 0 36 0 5:00 AM 58 0 0 58 0 36 0 6:00 AM 54 1 1 56 2 36 0 7:00 AM 42 3 1 46 4 36 0 8:00 AM 23 3 1 27 4 36 0 9:00 AM 14 3 2 19 5 36 0 10:00 AM 8 3 4 15 7 36 0 11:00 AM 5 3 7 15 10 36 0 12:00 PM 4 5 27 36 32 36 0 1:00 PM 4 4 23 31 27 36 0 2:00 PM 4 3 13 20 16 36 0 3:00 PM 5 2 8 15 10 36 0 4:00 PM 9 2 11 22 13 36 0 5:00 PM 17 2 25 44 27 36 0 6:00 PM 29 2 43 74 45 36 9 7:00 PM 33 1 52 86 53 51 2 8:00 PM 40 0 35 75 35 51 0 9:00 PM 46 0 31 77 31 51 0 10:00 PM 52 0 25 77 25 51 0 11:00 PM 55 0 12 67 12 51 0 12:00 AM 59 0 1 60 1 36 0 1:00 AM 59 0 0 59 0 36 0 2:00 AM 60 0 0 60 0 36 0 3:00 AM 59 0 0 59 0 36 0 4:00 AM 60 0 0 60 0 36 0 5:00 AM 56 0 1 57 1 36 0 6:00 AM 50 1 0 51 1 36 0 7:00 AM 37 4 0 41 4 36 0 8:00 AM 25 4 1 30 5 36 0 9:00 AM 13 4 1 18 5 36 0 10:00 AM 8 4 2 14 6 36 0 11:00 AM 3 4 3 10 7 36 0 12:00 PM 2 7 20 29 27 36 0 1:00 PM 3 6 24 33 30 36 0 2:00 PM 2 4 12 18 16 36 0 3:00 PM 4 3 9 16 12 36 0 4:00 PM 8 3 12 23 15 36 0 5:00 PM 15 3 22 40 25 36 0 6:00 PM 24 2 42 68 44 51 0 7:00 PM 29 1 47 77 48 51 0 8:00 PM 32 0 37 69 37 51 0 9:00 PM 41 0 24 65 24 51 0 10:00 PM 46 0 12 58 12 51 0 11:00 PM 50 0 3 53 3 51 0 12:00 AM 43 0 4 47 4 36 0 1:00 AM 46 0 0 46 0 36 0 2:00 AM 46 0 0 46 0 36 0 3:00 AM 47 0 0 47 0 36 0 4:00 AM 47 0 0 47 0 36 0 5:00 AM 47 0 0 47 0 36 0 6:00 AM 45 0 0 45 0 36 0 7:00 AM 41 0 0 41 0 36 0 8:00 AM 37 0 0 37 0 36 0 9:00 AM 32 1 0 33 1 36 0 10:00 AM 19 3 0 22 3 36 0 11:00 AM 12 5 2 19 7 36 0 12:00 PM 5 6 12 23 18 36 0 1:00 PM 4 7 20 31 27 36 0 2:00 PM 4 8 7 19 15 36 0 3:00 PM 6 8 12 26 20 36 0 4:00 PM 12 7 14 33 21 36 0 5:00 PM 8 6 20 34 26 51 0 6:00 PM 7 6 33 46 39 51 0 7:00 PM 10 5 46 61 51 51 0 8:00 PM 18 4 34 56 38 51 0 9:00 PM 23 2 22 47 24 51 0 10:00 PM 31 1 19 51 20 51 0 11:00 PM 37 0 12 49 12 51 0 On-Street Commercial Demand Off-Street Commercial Supply On-Street Commercial Demand Off-Street Commercial Supply On-Street Commercial Demand Time of Day Automobile Parking Needs (ITE) Not Adjusted for Pedestrian, Bicycle or Transit Usage Saturday Residential Demand TOTAL DEMAND Friday Retail Demand Retail Demand Retail Demand Residential Demand Residential Demand Restaurant Demand TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND Off-Street Commercial SupplyWeekdayTOTAL DEMAND TOTAL DEMAND Restaurant Demand Restaurant Demand Notes - Adjacent Property refers to 4528-4530 France Avenue - Surrounding Properties include Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge, 44th Street Dental, and DP Hue - Lake Harriet Masonic Lodge has some weeknight events, therefore the parking for that property is not included in the weekday supply 4500 France Avenue - Forecast Commercial Parking Demands & Supplies 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PMParking SpacesWeekday Retail Demand Restaurant Demand Off-Street Supply: On-Site Only Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property + Surrounding Properties 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PMParking SpacesFriday Retail Demand Restaurant Demand Off-Street Supply: On-Site Only Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property + Surrounding Properties 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 12:00 AM 1:00 AM 2:00 AM 3:00 AM 4:00 AM 5:00 AM 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PMParking SpacesSaturday Retail Demand Restaurant Demand Off-Street Supply: On-Site Only Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property Off-Street Supply: On-Site + Adjacent Property + Surrounding Properties The Lorient 4500 France Ave S VARIANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Q: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable. A: The Lorient retail space is 6,411 SF of rentable space, which at a 5.0 / 1,000 sf parking ratio would require 32 parking stalls. Within the first-floor parking area, the project provides 39 total parking stalls, of which three stalls are reserved for unit/resident parking, leaving 36 total public parking stalls for retail use. 36 public stalls equals a 5.63 / 1,000 sf parking ratio, which is 13% better than retail code for traditional retail uses. If the Lorient was allowed to include the 7 on street parking stalls “in front” of the project, along Sunnyside Ave, the parking ratio increases to 6.72 / 1,000 sf, which is 34% better than retail code. The Edina Restaurant parking ratio requirement is 10 / 1,000 sf which places an unreasonable parking requirement within urban re-development use. Other urban Edina developments, such as 50th & France, have area-wide parking (North, Middle & South ramps) available to support retail & restaurants, with zero dedicated parking. 44th & France has no area parking. Instead, in partnership with the City of Edina, The Lorient provides a practical solution by offering public parking to support the project and area needs. Q: Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. A: Other restaurant users within the district have limited or no dedicated parking stalls. For example, Convention Grill, Hello Pizza and Bruegger’s/Caribou are limited to on-street or very segregated and aggressively signed parking limits. None of these existing restaurants provide parking ratios near 10 / 1,000 sf and would require variances to occupy their current spaces. Additionally, traditional large mall parking lots (Southdale Mall) have found creative ways to adapt & re-use massive parking lots, furthermore supporting the notion that traditional parking ratios place outdated demands on retail & restaurant parking requirements. Q: Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance. A: The Lorient project went thru a comprehensive entitlement, re-zoning and approval process. The Lorient was approved with a 3,700 sf +/- useable SF restaurant planned, with a restriction to 35 seats. We accepted the 35-seat restriction as we were uncertain if a restaurant would be the best use for the space. Upon further review and evaluation, a restaurant space is a super fit for The Lorient, neighborhood, and provides a desired amenity to support the principles within the Small Area Plan. Q: Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood. A: The Small Area Plan for the 44th & France neighborhood sets specific guidelines for development within the area, as outlined within the Guiding Principles submitted, discussed and approved as part of the entitlement process for The Lorient. The restaurant use has been advertised and included within project submittals. A restaurant as proposed provides additional walkable, in- demand amenities to support the Small Area Plan. OTHER: During the entitlement process, The Lorient was designed to encourage pedestrian access & public transportation. There is a bus stop ½ block north, and another immediately across France Ave. from the project. We anticipate that a significant portion of restaurant staff would walk, bike, or use public transportation to commute. With onsite bicycle parking, both on street and covered within the parking garage, and a well landscaped streetscape with seating, art and a public plaza, The Lorient encourages bicycle, strollers and pedestrian traffic. Furthermore, the Orion development team held an open house at The Riveter on March 9, 2020. Approximately 30 residents attended. We held a 2+ hour reception for residents to mingle and discuss the project and held a 60-minute Q & A session. What we learned was that residents have two primary concerns: 1) On street parking will spill onto Sunnyside Ave, “beyond” the project boundaries 2) Pedestrian safety In the interest of maintain a partnership between Orion, the City of Edina, and the residents of Morningside and White Oaks, we offer the following ideas. These ideas are designed to alleviate the resident concerns and further align the project with the Small Area Plan. Restaurant Size: Orion and the operator have agreed to reduce the restaurant size from 110 seats to 100 seats. Parking: Orion has secured additional off-street parking agreements with the following properties: - Edina Gateway, 15 surface parking stalls adjacent to The Lorient - The Masonic Lodge, 12 surface parking stalls immediately across France Ave - 44th Street Dental, 24 surface parking stalls one block north, accessed via the public easement connecting Sunnyside Ave and 44th Street - DP Hue, 5 surface parking stalls one block northeast The parking agreements range from signed parking lease agreements to civic obligations of the property owners. Restaurant patrons will be directed to use the additional parking stalls via the restaurant website, directional maps provided at the hostess stand, using signage within the public parking area, and through the neighborhood association communication channels. Additionally, the restaurant workforce, which will not exceed ten employees, will be instructed to walk, use ride share or public transportation, reducing area parking demands. Pedestrian Safety: Orion met with staff to understand the process to provide crosswalks in the immediate neighborhood. Orion is supportive of adding more crosswalks in the area, especially as it relates to Morningside and White Oaks. Therefore, Orion agrees to fund the construction of a crosswalk at the western boundary of The Lorient, across Sunnyside (as determined by staff) not to exceed $7,500. Furthermore, Orion will re-design the parking entrance to eliminate the left-out turn from the public parking area. Other Discussion Points: It’s important to note that the approved and adopted 44th & France Small Area Plan specifically references parking & transportation multiple times. References are found on Pages xii (transportation), 11 (parking), 12 (calming), 38 (automobiles), 52 (parking), 65 and 66 (parking). The small area plan clearly identifies a desire reduce the reliance on automobiles, maximize the existing parking infrastructure, and enhance pedestrian safety. Additionally, we would like to highlight the current parking situation. Daily there are 50+ construction workers onsite, and concrete jersey barriers have closed the on-street Sunnyside Ave parking and narrowed automobile traffic on France Ave. The project is scheduled to be completed in July/August 2020 and will restore a safe and inviting streetscape to the neighborhood. Spack Consulting is in support of our parking plan and recognizes that there are other factors that reduce the parking demand. Lorient residents will very likely be frequent visitors to the restaurant, and ride sharing is a common and popular for both patrons and employees to utilize. In 2023 or 2024, additional accessibility to public transportation will materialize when the Metro Transit E line begins service, with bus stops adjacent to The Lorient. Restaurant deliveries have been raised as a concern. Our operator utilizes the same food suppliers as Convention Grill. In order to maximize efficiencies, food suppliers piggyback on deliveries. Therefore, there will be no additional food truck deliveries to the area. Our operator partner, Rebecca Illingsworth, was born in Mexico City and resides in St. Louis Park. Her husband and chef, Thierry, is from Normandale, France. They are excited to extend their neighborhood touch, currently exemplified at Tinto Kitchen at 50th & Penn, to The Lorient project. Lastly, we’d like to note that Orion has been an active developer throughout Edina, and has transformed old, contaminated sites into modern active developments. On the adjacent Edina Gateway site, proof of parking was granted to reduce the constructed parking stalls from 19 to 15, with the notion we could add 4 stalls where the current front yard greenspace is. We’d prefer to maintain that greenspace. For the Caribou Coffee project at 5000 Vernon Ave, Orion partnered with the City of Edina to provide land to create two left-turn lanes from Interlachen Boulevard onto Vernon Ave. We list these projects as examples where pre-development public angst has turned into post project success. Orion has financial and reputational risk within all our projects. A poor patron and resident experience would have a significant negative impact on our bottom line. Orion’s interests are aligned with the residents of Morningside and White Oaks to ensure that we provide a pleasant and safe experience at The Lorient. Attachments: - Seats to Stalls Matrix - Area Parking Availability 4500 FRANCE AVE SEDINA, MINNESOTARestaurant Off -Street Surface Parking OpportunitiesFRANCE AVE SFRANCE AVE SSUNNYSIDE RDSUNNYSIDE RDW 45TH STREETW 45TH STREETW 44TH STREETW 44TH STREET2441215#SURFACE PARKING STALLS 4500 FRANCE AVE SEDINA, MINNESOTARestaurant Off -Street Surface Parking OpportunitiesFRANCE AVE SFRANCE AVE S24Edina Edina GatewayGateway1512The Masonic LodgeThe Masonic Lodge4DP HueDP Hue44th Street44th StreetDentalDental ; (!\ PARKING LEVEt. ftOOR PlAN 8_ �>/l<M:-0• § @RRSTLEVEL fLOOR PLAN ;,i:u tn�•Nl" I France Ave Apartments 4SOOfr�neeAve$,blNMNS54lO 1_..,.....,..._ PRELIMINARY REZONING & SITE PLAN SUBMITT Al 7/27/2018 Of«Gl�ISSUE: RfN!S!ON:$; "'"· n ... ,,.r,.,.,� "" ��....-- �·-� .. - Fr.tnte Ave Apartments PARKING & FIRS'i lfVEt PLAN A0.2 EQUIPMENT LIST K 101 01 REMARKSITEMQTYDESCRIPTION 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 and report any discrepancies in the plans and specifications to DISENOS for correction or clarification. Field verify the accuracy of all space dimensionsoccur or conditions be discovered that change the dimensionsand specifications for the Project, some discrepancies may Although every effort is made to provide accurate drawings as shown. 0 1 3 6 10' 0 1 2 3m EQUIPMENT PLAN & LISTYEAR CONSTRUCTED:PROJECT AREA:PIN:PROJECT NO: ISSUE DATE: SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" Indicates Existing Walls to be Removed Indicates New Walls Indicates Existing Walls to Remain 4 Cash Register / P.O.S.By Owner Soap / Towel Dispensers Bag 'n' Box System Wire Shelf Unit Floor-Mtd Mop Sink Mop Rack w/ Shelf Ice Machine Spare Number 1 2 2 1 Lot Dining Table w/ Base Banquette / Booth Seat Dining Chair Custom Cabinet (Host)1 Lot Lot 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 High-Top Table w/ Base Walk-in Beer Cooler Wine Rack Decorative Shelf (Liquor) Glass / Mug Chiller Bottle Cooler Spare Number Glass Washer Bar Hand Sink Beer Taps Bar Workboard Glasses By Purveyor By EcoLab Bar Blender Cocktail Station Speed Rail Bar Stool Custom Bar1 25 1 1 2 2 Lot 1 1 1 2 1 Lot Lot 1 Lot B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B Tell-Tale Drain By Owner By Owner 59 Open Shelf Utility Stand1 Open Shelf Utility Stand3 72" 48" Tea Brewer / Dispenser Coffee Brewer / Dispenser Drop-in Dump Sink Hand Sink w/Side Shields3 1 4 1 1 Spare Number Stainless Steel Pass Shelf Food Warmer2 Steam Table Worktop Freezer Microwave Oven Refr Prep Table Stainless Steel Overshelf Worktop Refrigerator Canopy Exhaust Hood 1 1 2 1 1 1 Range w/ Conv Oven Salamander w/ Brackets Griddle 1 1 1 Spare Number Char Broiler1 Equipment Stand Deep Fryer Convection Oven 1 1 Rotisserie Oven Stainless Steel Worktable Refrigerated Chef Base Vertical Broiler Gyros Stainless Steel Worktable Rice Cooker Spare Number 2-Compartment Prep Sink Wall-Mtd Shelf UnitLot 1 3-Comp Scullery Sink Spray Rinse w/ Faucet Stainless Steel Worktable Stainless Steel Worktable Reach-in Refrigerator Reach-in Freezer Walk-in Cooler / Freezer Walk-in Shelf UnitLot Lot Soiled Dish Table Dish Rack Shelf Disposer Dish Machine By EcoLab Spare Number Dish Machine Clean Dish Table Dish Rack Shelf1 1 1 1 1 1 Exhaust Hood 1 1 Spare Number 4 2 2 1 Pallet / Dunnage Rack Bar 4-Compartment Sink Tell-Tale Drain Tell-Tale Drain 36" x 36" 20.001 DISENOS ST. LOUIS PARK , MN 55426 T 612.309.1234 DISENOS@ParkAtelier.com P O BOX 26455 J W Mc ELMURY C 2020 K L MJ 15 FEB 20 99'-2" PLAN N O R T H T R U E P N R NEW CONSTRUCTION4500 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTHEDINA , MINNESOTA 55410CAKE EATERS CAFE3,461 sf07-028-24-44-0066, 0067, 0068, 0069, 0070, 01631 2 3 Ramp Down 1:12 Main Entrance Lounge Bar Entry Patio 100'-6" (12 Seats)183618361836183618361836Beer Cooler18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 36 18 361836Liquor Storage 18 48 Walk-in Cooler Beer TapsIce MFreezerLockers 3-Comp Scullery Sink2-Comp Prep SinkHandHandPrep TableClean SoiledDM Hood Mop Hot Holding 1836Host Waiting13' Exh HoodFood PickupServers StationDry StorageTo Restrooms Office Private Dining Wait Station Wait Station Delivery Entrance DN 1848184818481836184818361836Prep Table Bar (14 Seats)Elec February 12, 2020 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Parking Stall Variance and Revised Final development plan for 4500 France Avenue. Information / Background: Orion Investments is requesting a parking stall variance and an amendment to their approved final development plan (site plan) to increase the seating capacity of the approved restaurant from 35 seats to 110 seats in the new development under construction at 4500 France Avenue. The approved restaurant space in the 2018 approved plan was 3,587 square feet in size, with two retail spaces being 2,960 square feet in size. The proposed new restaurant space would increase to 3,731 square feet, while the retail space would decrease to 2,680 square feet. There are no other changes proposed to the approved plans. The project currently under construction will have 45 units of housing, an enclosed surface parking lot with 39 stalls, and underground parking containing 71 stalls. Three of the 39 stalls are designated for resident parking; therefore, 36 stalls are available for the retail and restaurant. The surface parking lot has a public parking easement over it, to allow retail customers in the 44th and France district to also parking on site. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The access road off of France is on the adjacent property to the south, which is owned by the applicant. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Retail uses; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Easterly: Retail uses in the City of Minneapolis. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Southerly: Retail & Office uses; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Westerly: Single-Family homes; zoned R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is one acre in size, and a mixed use retail and housing structure is under construction. Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node. Zoning: PUD, Planned Unit Development Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1312, a total of 65 parking stall would be required for the retail and 110 seat restaurant (see table below). The proposed plans would provide 36 parking stalls on the site. The applicant also owns the property to the south and would make available 15 stalls when the business on that site are closed to make up for some of the shortage. The Spack Consulting parking study concludes that even with the 15 available stalls during the peak operation of the restaurant, there would be four (4) days each week in the evening, when there would not be adequate off-street parking; two weekdays and each Friday and Saturday night. (See attached study.) Engineering staff has reviewed the Spack Consulting parking study and provided a memo regarding the conclusions of that assessment. (See attached memo.) Code Requirement Proposed 2,680 s.f. retail spaces = 18 spaces (8 spaces for the 1st 1,000 s.f. 6 spaces per each additional 1,000 s.f.) 110 seat restaurant = 47 spaces (1 space per 3 seats + 1 space per employee on a maximum shift {10 employees}) Total = 65 spaces required 36 enclosed spaces proposed* *Variance and amended final development plan required STAFF REPORT Page 3 Final Development Plan Amendment The approved final development plan for this development, limited the restaurant seating to 35. (See attached city council minutes.) Therefore, the final development plan approval as part of the rezoning requires an amendment. (See attached 2018 resolution that approved the final development plan.) Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access points to the proposed development would not be altered. Access would be off France and Sunnyside. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic and parking study which concludes that existing roadways would still support the project and the additional restaurant size. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted. (See attached study.) 44th & France Small Area Plan Guiding Principle 7: Parking Parking should be hidden from view behind or beneath buildings on the west side of France Avenue. The large parking lot with multiple owners between Sunnyside and 44th Street should be reimagined as a "community parking facility" 5 that accommodates parking for the study area (district). This community parking facility should be designed to double as gathering space and should have the flexibility to change over time, as other modes of transportation, such as ride- sharing, become more common and fewer parking spaces are needed. While district parking is contemplated in the 44th and France SAP, it has not yet been constructed. The proposed plan to increase the size of the restaurant would cause an increase to visible parking within the area. Parking Stall Variance As shown above, a parking variance from 65 spaces required to 36 is required. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does not meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical STAFF REPORT Page 4 difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. There is no practical difficulty in this instance. The applicant was approved for a project that allowed for restaurant for a maximum seating capacity of 35. The practical difficulty is caused by the applicant’s desire for additional seating. Spack Consulting performed a parking study and concluded that the off-street parking (36 on-site spaces, evening use of 15 spaces from the property to the south) would not be enough to satisfy the shortage. (See attached parking study.) The study concludes that four (4) days each week there would be a parking shortage in the evening; two weekdays and each Friday and Saturday. During these times, parking would then spill out onto adjacent streets. While there may be adequate parking available on adjacent streets, the city has not considered on street parking to satisfy off street parking requirements or as justification for variances. Additionally, while these 15 spaces would assist the parking shortage, there is no guarantee that they would remain available in the future. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? No. There are no unique circumstances. As mentioned above, the applicant was approved for a 35-seat maximum restaurant. The circumstances of being short parked are caused by the applicant’s desire for a larger restaurant; therefore, are self-created. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. Additional interior restaurant seats would not alter the character of the neighborhood. On street parking is an allowed use on adjacent streets. However, the increase in on-street parking could be interpreted as impacting the character of the single-family residential district to the west, if on-street parking extends into the area where single-family homes are located. Options for Consideration & Recommendation As noted above in the variance review, staff is recommending denial of the request. Below provide options for the planning commission and city council to consider: Denial Recommend the City Council deny the parking stall variance from 65 spaces to 36 and final development plan revision to expand the allowable restaurant seating from 35 seats to 110. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. There is no practical difficulty in this instance. The applicant was approved for a project that allowed for restaurant for a maximum seating capacity of 35. 2. The practical difficulty is caused by the applicant’s desire for additional seating. 3. Reasonable use exists on the site with the development that was originally approved. STAFF REPORT Page 5 4. Spack Consulting performed a parking study and concluded that the off-street parking (36- 39 spaces) would not be enough to satisfy the shortage. Four (4) days each week there would be a parking shortage in the evening; two weekdays and each Friday and Saturday. During these times, parking would then spill out onto adjacent streets, even though fifteen (15) parking stalls would be made available on the applicant’s property to the south. 5. While these 15 stalls on the south property would assist in the parking stall shortage, there is no guarantee that they remain available in the future. 6. There may be adequate parking available on adjacent streets, however, the city has not considered on-street parking to satisfy off street parking requirements or as justification for variances. 7. On-street parking could extend into the adjacent single-family residential area to the west, which could negatively impact the character of the neighborhood. Approval Recommend the City Council approve the parking stall variance from 65 spaces to 36 and final development plan revision to expand the allowable restaurant seating from 35 seats to 110. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Parking would be accommodated by the existing 36 on-site parking stalls, the 15-stalls on the property to the south when needed, and adjacent on-street parking. 2. The site is located on a bus route; the project is pedestrian friendly with expanded sidewalks and bicycle park available. Employees would be encouraged to use these alternative modes of transportation. The applicant must make efforts to implement Travel Demand Management strategies to encourage alternative modes of transportation and reduce the impact of motor vehicles (consistent with the 44th & France Small Area Plan and the transportation goals in the Comprehensive Plan). These strategies may include; i. Providing secure bicycle parking in well-lit, convenient areas near key entrances ii. Providing on-site bicycle repair station iii. Providing directional signage for locating transportation amenities (bus stops, bicycle parking, etc.) iv. Designating 5% of parking spaces for electric vehicles, carpool or vanpool v. Subsidizing transit passes for tenants/employees (Metro Transit’s future E-Line bus rapid transit service, which will operate between the Southdale Transit Center and the University of Minnesota, will likely have stations at 44th and France) vi. Distributing information to all new and existing tenants/employees annually (bike maps, transit info, rideshare mapping applications) STAFF REPORT Page 6 3. The parking study done by Spack Solutions concludes that there would be an adequate on- street parking supply on Sunnyside Road and France Avenue adjacent to the site to accommodate the additional parking demand for a 110-seat restaurant. 4. The on-site commercial parking is available to users of other commercial properties in the 44th and France District. The Spack study further concludes that any non-site vehicles that would utilize this parking area are currently parking on-street in the area. Therefore, the net change to on-street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends denial subject to the findings listed in the denial option above. Deadline for a city decision: April 1, 2020 Date: February 6, 2020 To: 4500 France Ave, Owner and Development Team Cc: Cary Teague – Community Development Director Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering From: Andrew Scipioni – Transportation Planner Re: 4500 France Avenue – Parking Variance Orion Investments is requesting a parking variance for a mixed-use redevelopment at 4500 France Avenue. This development is proposed to include 46 residential units, 2,700 square feet of retail and 3,700 square foot, 110 seat restaurant. Spack Solutions completed a parking assessment for this project on behalf of the City to compare the proposed parking supply to the anticipated demand for the site. This memo will outline my response to the conclusions of that assessment. For the purposes of this memo, only the commercial parking will be reviewed as proposed residential parking spaces meet minimum City requirements. The commercial demand for the site is comprised of that for the retail and the restaurant (the latter accounting for the majority of the demand). The proposed commercial parking supply is 36 spaces, which will be placed in a public parking easement and available for drivers traveling to surrounding sites. Orion Investments also currently owns the commercial property at 4528 France Avenue, immediately south of the proposed development. This site currently includes a bank, dry cleaner and other retail. The applicant is proposing that the 15 additional spaces at 4528 France can be utilized as overflow parking for 4500 France when the businesses are not open. While these parking spaces are not currently signed as “customer only,” there is no public parking easement over them to guarantee that they remain available in the future. The commercial component of the proposed development would require a total of 40 parking spaces (only 36 are proposed on-site). However, Spack’s demand forecasting for the retail and restaurant show that even 40 parking spaces will be insufficient at various times of the day. Weekday analysis (see Figure 1 below) shows that the on-site commercial parking will be insufficient for the demand from 6:00 - 9:00 p.m., resulting in 3 to 22 vehicles parking on-street. Including the available parking spaces at 4528 France narrows this window to 6:00 - 8:00 p.m. with 7 to 13 vehicles parking on-street. Figure 1: Commercial Parking Supply and Demand – Weekday Friday analysis (see Figure 2 below) shows that the on-site commercial parking will be insufficient for the demand from 6:00 - 9:00 p.m., resulting in 4 to 17 vehicles parking on-street. Including the available parking spaces at 4528 France narrows this window to 7:00 - 8:00 p.m. with 2 vehicles parking on-street. Figure 2: Commercial Parking Supply and Demand - Friday 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PMParking SpacesTime of Day Restaurant Demand Retail Demand Supply at 4500 France Supply including 4528 France 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PMParking SpacesTime of Day Restaurant Demand Retail Demand Supply at 4500 France Supply including 4528 France Saturday analysis (see Figure 3 below) shows that the on-site commercial parking will be insufficient for the demand from 6:00 - 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 - 11:00 p.m., resulting in 5 to 20 vehicles parking on-street. Including the available parking spaces at 4528 France narrows this window to 7:00 - 8:00 p.m. with 5 vehicles parking on- street. Figure 3: Commercial Parking Supply and Demand - Saturday Given the absence of other shared district parking, existing commercial demand for on-street parking in the area and the proximity of the development to residential streets with on-street parking restrictions, I would not recommend granting a variance for this development that would result in more vehicle demand than can be handled on-site. It is important to note that these estimated demands do not take into account those who may walk, bike or take transit to or from the site. The applicant should make efforts to implement Travel Demand Management strategies to encourage alternative modes of transportation and reduce the impact of motor vehicles (consistent with the 44th & France Small Area Plan and the transportation goals in the Comprehensive Plan). These strategies may include; • Providing secure bicycle parking in well-lit, convenient areas near key entrances • Providing on-site bicycle repair station • Providing directional signage for locating transportation amenities (bus stops, bicycle parking, etc.) • Designating 5% of parking spaces for electric vehicles, carpool or vanpool • Subsidizing transit passes for tenants/employees (Metro Transit’s future E-Line bus rapid transit service, which will operate between the Southdale Transit Center and the University of Minnesota, will likely have stations at 44th and France) • Distributing information to all new and existing tenants/employees annually (bike maps, transit info, rideshare mapping applications) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 12:00 AM1:00 AM2:00 AM3:00 AM4:00 AM5:00 AM6:00 AM7:00 AM8:00 AM9:00 AM10:00 AM11:00 AM12:00 PM1:00 PM2:00 PM3:00 PM4:00 PM5:00 PM6:00 PM7:00 PM8:00 PM9:00 PM10:00 PM11:00 PMParking SpacesTime of Day Restaurant Demand Retail Demand Supply at 4500 France Supply including 4528 France Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 5 The Council asked why the bidding for this project was so low. Mr. Millner explained competitive bidding processes were used with all projects and suggested the estimate on this project was higher than anticipated. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:02 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to continue the public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2018-90, Countryside G Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, to October 16, 2018. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.H. BIRCHCREST A AND COUNTRYSIDE B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, RESOLUTION NO. 2018-91 – CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 16, 2018 Mr. Millner outlined the Birchcrest A and Countryside B neighborhood roadway reconstruction project and estimate of $8,569,082.00 with a final cost of $6,022,652.32 or a 29% decrease. He noted $13,046.24 per REU was less than the $17,200 estimate and the project had 213 REUs to divide the cost. He stated all street assessments could be paid over 15 years. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:16 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to continue the public hearing and consideration of Resolution No. 2018-91, Birchcrest A and Countryside B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, to October 16, 2018. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.I. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-92 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09; PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 4500 FRANCE AVENUE AND 3905 AND 3907 SUNNSIDE ROAD – ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague presented the request of Orion Investments to redevelop a one- acre tract of land at 4500 France Avenue and 3905 and 3907 Sunnyside Road that would include a 4-story, 45-unit apartment, 6,500 square feet of restaurant and retail space with 69 below-grade parking stalls and 40 at-grade, enclosed public parking stalls for the retail uses. Units would range from 1- to 3-bedrooms with 2 units (4%) proposed for affordable housing. Mr. Teague stated the project would also include a public gathering space/pocket park on the west side of the development to provide transition to the single-family neighborhood to the west, improved pedestrian and public realm space along France and Sunnyside, and an amenity terrace facing south. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The access road off France was on the adjacent property to the south, which was owned by the applicant. Existing curb cuts on the subject property on France would be eliminated. Mr. Teague highlighted changes completed by the applicant since sketch plan review that included a reduction in the number of units from 52 to 45, direct residential unit access to the pocket park, activated Sunnyside portion of the project with the lobby and a portion of the restaurant on Sunnyside, building redesign at the corner to incorporate metal panels within a projecting bay element to vary the architectural expression at the intersection, and others. He stated the Planning Commission added two conditions in their recommendation that included limiting construction traffic to France Avenue and all commercial deliveries Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 6 to be done during non-peak hours. He said the applicant had also revised their affordable housing proposal to address a concern of the Planning Commission in regard to providing all affordable housing units within the development. He noted this was the first Small Area Plan as part of the Comprehensive Plan review and consistent with the Plan. Mr. Teague then described outreach and community meetings held during the process. He noted the applicant was willing to provide 40 stalls for district parking and addressed setbacks. The Council asked questions regarding site plan, square footage breakdown, and the 46 units of affordable housing. The Council also inquired where the transition would occur from four- to two-stories and confirmed which parcels were included within the Small Area Plan. Mr. Teague outlined the boundary and confirmed that while the project included just one of the parcels, the applicant had requested the City extend the boundary to include both lots. The Council confirmed the proposal was entirely within the approved Small Area Plan study area adopted in March 2018. Max Moreland, Spack Consulting, answered questions of the Council regarding how parking would be affected by the reduced number of units, the use could be compared to a similar-sized use such as a drug store or drycleaner, and the proposed use included pass-by trips or trips that were already in the area. The Council commented on having one entrance and exit onto France Avenue rather than two, which would require the entrance to be accessible to both the public parking for retail and private for the apartments. The Council stressed the importance of safe access and balance between the Sunnyside residents and inquired whether affordable housing units were proposed as microunits. Mr. Moreland said the entrance on France Avenue would allow two access points from the west and could come straight in. Traffic going north on France Avenue would have an easier movement with the signal from Sunnyside to go north. He noted access on Sunnyside provided a safer option going north on France Avenue and this circulation would better fit the site. The Council inquired about height limits and transition to the neighborhood along France Avenue and asked whether the community came to those conclusions. Mr. Teague replied most of discussion was held on the two-stories adjacent to single-family homes and that it was reasonable due to the adjacent single-family zoning. He also commented on the give-to-get elements that included the pocket park, underground utility lines, and how more density and height was one way to get those public improvements. The Council asked if the island could be eliminated to change the character of the corner without impeding safety. Mr. Teague explained that was applicant’s desire as well but unfortunately, trucks would not be able to make that turn. Applicant Presentation Ted Carlson, Orion Development, shared project timing and history and said they were very involved during the Small Area Plan development to assure the project conformed with the Plan through height reduction of 62 to 48 feet, decreased units from 64 to 45, and building square footage by 26%. He said they worked with staff after Planning Commission feedback to identify three fully ADA accessible affordable units at 750 square feet. Those units are all one-bedroom and not microunits. Mr. Carlson shared the give-to-get elements that included removal of a blighted building and contamination, underground power lines and curb cuts, wider sidewalks, pedestrian/bike friendly elements, public park and art, public parking, affordable ADA units, new housing, and the site’s highest and best use. He commented how the site was compliant for retail use for parking and would blend with other retail requirements such as a restaurant, acknowledging that would require a variance in the future. Mr. Orion shared their award of the second largest DEED grant which speaks to level of contamination in this site. Gretchen Camp, ESG Architects, reviewed changes to the project and site design updates that included public gathering space along Sunnyside as a buffer to the adjacent residential properties, programmed public pocket park as an amenity to the neighborhood with an art feature and permanent seating, landscape plan elements with an outdoor dog run, bench seating, decorative lighting, and planting beds. She said they worked to activate Sunnyside by relocating the primary residential lobby and shared the sustainable design strategies that would be incorporated into the project. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 7 Burt Kaufman, ESG Architects, said this was a classic building design with base and modified building façade, darker brick, and a large bay-type window. He outlined how the building steps created a row house character element and commented on the parking screening, enlarged windows, and increased balcony depths. The Council confirmed dedication of the public realm space was contained within the site and opacity of the parking ramp with enough lighting for security. Mr. Teague confirmed a sidewalk easement would be required for the France Avenue side and the applicant would maintain the Sunnyside sidewalks. Mr. Carlson stated should the project convert from apartments to condominiums, the City had the first right of refusal to purchase the affordable units. He pledged that should the affordable term expire, it would be renewed. The Council asked about the process for a variance for a future restaurant and requested that an amendment to the PUD would occur instead to ensure Council approval. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:53 p.m. Public Testimony Scott Smith 3913 Morningside Road, addressed the Council. Tom Gerahard, 4360 France Avenue, addressed the Council. Mary Kay Reistad 4055 Sunnyside Road addressed the Council. Susan Peterson, 4060 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Sarah Lathrop, 4008 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Laura Plaetzer, 4058 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Steve Erickson 5114 Arden Court, addressed the Council. Mark Schmidt 4011 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Matt Cramer, 4005 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Ryan Hartung 5115 Arden Avenue, addressed the Council. Cheryl Appledorn, 4611 Townes Circle, addressed the Council. Frank Lorenz 7151 York Avenue, addressed the Council. Judy Johnson, 4300 France Avenue, addressed the Council. Brent Rogers 5413 Halifax Lane, addressed the Council. Charles Myre,4000 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Ron Erhardt, 4214 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Patrick Judge 4307 Eaton Place, addressed the Council. Pete Deanovic, 4209 W 44th Street, addressed the Council. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 8 Brian Pankratz, 5429 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. The Council confirmed the applicant would maintain the park,shared concerns about the intersection at 44th Street and Sunnyside, closing curb cuts on France Avenue, and leverage that created a better design and addressed power poles. The Council commented on ingress and egress on France and Sunnyside to allow a right turn only onto Sunnyside. Mr. Carlson explained why having to access the site from France Avenue only would not best serve the property or its residents. The Council confirmed soil mitigation efforts and inquired about possible truck traffic regulation. Mr. Millner said truck traffic cannot be restricted on this public roadway. Mr. Teague stated a condition of approval included that all commercial deliveries be completed during nonpeak hours as well as limiting traffic onto France Avenue during construction. The Council inquired about the proposed 500 new trips per day, need to respect the parking ordinance, and not be under parked. The Council confirmed the project complied with the Small Area Plan and agreed with the need to confirm parking and the PUD amendment for any future restaurant. The Council stated the solution was district parking as outlined in the Small Area Plan and cautioned against a future restaurant approval without sufficient parking. The Council also requested options for the roadway porkchop to make the area safer for pedestrians. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-92 approving the Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and PCD-1, Planned Commercial District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 4500 France Avenue, 3905 & 3907 Sunnyside Road, Orion Investments, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated July 27, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. Three units within the project must be provided for residents earning no more than 50% AMI for 15 years from the date of the certificate of occupancy. Additionally, $160,000 shall be paid to the City of Edina prior to issuance of a building permit for the City to provide affordable housing units else ware in the City. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated August 20, 2018. 9. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic Study recommendations. 10. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 11. Dedication of public access easements along the sidewalks and pocket park. 12. A shared parking agreement to allow district parking in the street level parking lot. 13. A shared access easement must be established over the shared driveway on the property to the south. Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 9 14. Construction traffic shall be limited to France Avenue. 15. All commercial deliveries shall be done during non-peak hours. 16. The restaurant shall be limited to 35 seats and located at the northernmost retail space shown on the site plan. 17. The overhead power lines must be buried from 4540 France Avenue north to the intersection of 44th and France. 18. The applicant and staff shall explore the potential for traffic calming at the intersection of Sunnyside and France. 19. The Edina Housing Foundation and/or the City’s HRA shall have the first right of refusal to purchase the affordable housing units if the apartments are turned in condos; if the units remain rental, after 15 years the property owner will consider extending the affordable housing units for an additional 15 years. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council discussed concerns raised during public testimony regarding the importance of pedestrian safety and district parking and how this project would address those elements. The Council spoke about the possibility of a TIF district and suggested removing the porkchop and restricting truck turning movements. The Council expressed support for the modern building with its traditional elements, timeless materials, green building elements, and stressed the importance of not exceeding parking available to support a restaurant use as the site would redevelop at some point. The Council acknowledged that how the project fit the Small Area Plan was key, their preference was for four units of affordable housing rather than three and a buy-in, and requested assurance that all become part of the overall building. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Member Stewart made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2018-09, an Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development-15 Zoning District. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. The Council took a short recess. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. ARDEN PARK 90% DESIGN REPORT AND AUTHORIZE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT TO FINALIZE PLANS AND ADVERTISE FOR BID - APPROVED Councilmember Fischer stated he would recuse himself from this item due to his employer’s active contracts with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Councilmember Stewart disclosed that he was an ex-officio member of the Policy Advisory Committee for the District. Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh reviewed the Arden Park 90% design report, public engagement process, and development goals, then highlighted changes from the 60% check-in that included a park shelter and budget update. She outlined next steps and schedule and asked the Council to authorize Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to finalize plans to bid the project after selection of either Option 4C or 7C for the shelter. Renae Clark, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, provided the 90% design report that included stormwater, trails and bridges, creek restoration and access, shelter, and playground details. She outlined stream improvement alternatives, design elements that followed the evolution of the District’s planning and project implementation process, and outlined water quality benefits achieved through stormwater and filtration swales and bridge structures over swales. Ms. Clark highlighted habitat and biology stream restoration elements, creek restoration below West 54th Street through removal of the concrete slab that would result in no damage to the bridge. She shared new and upgraded trail information and changes made since the 60% design that included removal of 350 feet of the sidewalk to maximize useable green space in Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 10 the park. Ms. Clark commented on two oak trees that would need replacement due to possible stress from flooding and outlined that 57 ash trees would be removed for a total of 136 trees impacted. The Council asked questions regarding sediment flow, creek meander proposals with one rejected plan, and which portions of the walkway included pervious materials. Ms. Clark explained the proposals for dam removal without a remeander element were both rejected in favor of full stream restoration with the City. The Council commented about on the impact of Emerald Ash borer that would result in removal of more trees as part of this project and noted the neighborhood design review team’s role. Ms. Kattreh said staff struggled with review of the two shelter design plans and the resulting sustainability efforts knowing four options provided the least in terms of daylighting. She shared the updated budget totaled $5,331,110 at the 90% design estimate and noted the $669,000 increased came mostly from design costs that were missed, not project costs. Ms. Katreh outlined next steps included Watershed Board of Managers approval of final design and to authorize bids with notice to proceed in December, construction to begin in January, and completion by November 2019. The Council commented on the proposed design plan that included branding, sustainability, long-term maintenance costs and the developed pattern to design shelters based on park character. The Council shared the concept of the shelter having two fronts on both the neighborhood side and creek side and how the neighborhood committee preferred Option 4C. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to accept the Arden Park 90% Design Report, authorize Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to Finalize Plans and Advertise for Bid, and select Option 4C as the preferred building design. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION 2018-93 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS - ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-93 accepting various grants and donations. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. RECEIVE PETITION REQUESTING REMOVAL OF A STREET LIGHT – Received Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to receive the petition requesting removal of street light at 5410 York Avenue. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried IX.B. CORRESPONDENCE - Received Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.C. MINUTES – Received 1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, AUGUST 9, 2018 2. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, AUGUST 28, 2018 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/October 2, 2018 Page 11 XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. COMMUNITY COMMENT FOLLOW-UP – Received XII.B. SELECTION PROCESS FOR HOUSING FOUNDATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCY – Received XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF OCTOBER 2, 2018 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:23 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, October 16, 2018. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the October 2, 2018, meeting available. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 5 of 12 • Commissioners asked if the first floor height is being based off of the existing entry and Bodeker responded in the affirmative. Appearing for the Applicant Scott Busyn, Great Neighborhood Homes, introduced himself and opened the floor for questions. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners asked about the retaining wall and what it will be made of. Busyn replied that it will be built out of a stone material or a type of cast stone. Busyn also commented that the city will require Engineering to review the retaining wall since it is over 4 feet and it will have an inspection. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions None. Motion Commissioner Nemerov moved approval of the variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried. Staff Presentation E. Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider Orion Investments’ request to redevelop of a one acre tract of land at 4500 France Avenue and 3905 & 3907 Sunnyside Road with a 4- story 45 unit apartment with retail use on the first floor. To accommodate the request the following is required: • A Rezoning from R-1 and PCD-1to PUD, Planned Unit Development; and • Site Plan Review. Appearing for the Applicant Ted Carlson, Orion Investments and Mike Spack, Spack Consulting Discussion/Comments/Questions Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 6 of 12 • Planner Teague was asked by Commissioners if the “island” was being included in the scheme, as it was in previous proposal. Teague replied that it is not included and the free right would still be there with this project. Commissioners asked if the building was pulled back to get the public space or if it’s in the same location. Teague responded that it is in the same spot and there isn’t as much outdoor space. Teague was also asked where the first residential house appears on the Sunnyside side elevation and he replied that the first residential house is further west past the commercial establishments on Sunnyside. • Commissioners asked if this section of France Avenue is considered a county road and Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioners also asked if Hennepin County has checked in on the turning movements and Millner responded that Hennepin County submitted comments and their concerns were the maintenance of the plantings, snow storage, and to gather any easements for the sidewalks, which are all covered in the Engineering Memo. Millner added that Hennepin County did not have any comments on the access of France Ave. in this location with the driveway because they are going from 4 driveway cuts to 1. • Commissioners asked about what types of trucks are turning by the “pork chop” coming from Sunnyside and Millner replied that large delivery trucks providing materials to those businesses on the North side of Sunnyside Road, including full size moving semi-trucks. Millner also explained that if the island were to be removed, the entire signal system would need to be moved and storm water catch basins. Commissioners commented that everyone agreed in the Small Area Plan that pedestrian bicycle safety is a huge issue on France Ave. Commissioners explained that there are a large number of pedestrians and bicyclists that want to cross France Ave. safely than number of trucks that need to take a right turn. • Planner Teague asked Commissioners if the Planning Commission and City Council would recommend this for approval that it would be considered a condition to work with the county and take the pork chop out and Commissioners responded in the affirmative. Millner asked Commissioners if the concern was strictly crossing France Ave. and Commissioners replied that it is the whole area near the project, including Sunnyside Ave. • Commissioners explained that in some communities they appraise the items that are more subjective in the give to get. Commissioners stated that some of the items on the give to get currently are pretty standard and asked Planners if there are estimates for what the city if getting. Planner Teague thanked the Commissioners and stated that a very rough ballpark would be approximately $80,000- $100,000 for burying of the utility lines and sidewalks, $500,000 for the public park. Commissioners stated that they encourage the city to formalize a process to establish values for the give to get for transparency purposes. Commissioners also commented that some of the give to get items seemed more appropriate for getting a permit rather than a variance. Teague commented that all developments that are requesting rezoning are expected to meet the Affordable Housing Policy. Teague explained that the give to get list is taken from the small area plan and certain items, like sidewalk improvements, would be requested even with a site plan review. • Commissioners asked if there were any external bike racks being provided and Teague replied that is a standard code requirement based off the square footage of the retail space of 1 bike rack per parking stall. Commissioners also asked if the 4 story length was reduced along Sunnyside and Teague responded that it is generally the same. Applicant Presentation Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 7 of 12 Mr. Spack explained why the project is a good idea from a traffic engineer’s perspective due to the reduction from 4 driveways to 1 common driveway down on France Ave. Spack also noted that the level of service at the intersections will be maintained at an acceptable level. Spack commented that putting in a pharmacy would generate about twice as much traffic as the proposed development. Discussion/Comments/Questions • Mr. Spack was asked how much traffic the drycleaners generated when it was operating and he responded that he did not have those numbers, and added that it would have been much less traffic than a pharmacy would produce. Commissioners also asked if the traffic would have been more or less than the proposed project and Spack responded that it would have been slightly less than what is being proposed and he would need the square footage of the drycleaners to run those numbers. • Commissioners asked Spack how he comes up with his predictions or projected traffic and explain the process of the study. Spack replied that it is looked at from a few different ways, including the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s data set of land uses around the country and the traffic rates by different types of uses. Spack also stated that local data is collected using video camera technology on different driveways of different land uses. • Commissioners asked Spack is he considered this lane 2 or 4 lane and Spack replied that it is considered 2 lane with turn lanes, and it is a starting point for the analysis because the whole corridor can work well but have pinch points that get looked into at a micro level. • Commissioners also asked Spack if there was a deeper reasoning for asking all loading on site should be encouraged to occur during outside of peak hours and Spack replied that there is not a deeper reason and it’s just good hygiene to not add to rush hour. • Spack was asked by Commissioners to explain the negotiation with the county and what the possibilities might look like. Spack explained that if we can get rid of the channelized right turn, it has the benefit for the pedestrians and bicyclists. Spack explained the tradeoff would be that large semi-trucks would not be able to make the turn. Spack added that the county is seeing a benefit by eliminating the 3 driveways and consolidating furthest south with the other parcel. Commissioners asked if this would be the time to negotiate and Spark responded in the affirmative and the city would have a strong position if they wanted to go that path. Millner added that if the park chop moved, the county might require a right turn lane and making it a longer cross walk for pedestrians, in addition to some other tradeoffs. • Commissioners commented that one of the options to move the signal to have a wider area attached to the building, and to lose the island. Commissioners asked if the developer was to move the signal as a condition, what the cost estimate would be. Spack responded that his estimate would be in a range from $50,000 to $75,000 to move 1 quadrant of the signal, while Millner commented that an estimate for moving a whole intersection would be $300,000 to $400,000 depending on impacts. • Spack was asked about the parking capacity on Saturday evening with the restaurant and retail with overflow parking needing to be handled on the street. Spack responded that if the retail and restaurant were both busier, they would forecast 20 to 25 vehicles circulating looking for street Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 8 of 12 parking. Teague commented that if the restaurant they want to add exceeds the 40 parking stalls, they would need a variance which would come to the Planning Commission. • Spack was asked about the cueing conflicts regarding the driveway on France Ave. and the parcel to the south operating more as a one way. Spack noted that it is expected to be a low traffic driveway and they don’t see it as a significant issue. Millner also commented that he is in agreement with Spack. • Commissioners asked if speeds of traffic were looked at on France on Sunnyside and has the city received reports or complaints regarding the speed of traffic. Millner responded that the street on Sunnyside was reconstructed in 2016 and did a volume and speed analysis. Curb cuts and bump outs were added at Grimes and Curve Ave. There was a reduction in volume afterwards, and the speeds stayed consistent. Millner also added that there have been no traffic safety requests since the reconstruction. • Commissioners asked Staff if the speed limit signs might be encouraging people to go faster than they would normally drive. Millner replied that the speed limit signs were needed because the speed changes along France. Applicant Presentation Ted Carlson thanked the Planning Commission and stated that he was excited to be there after more than 14 months of planning. Carlson and his development team presented the project. Carlson replied to Chair Olson’s question earlier about the contamination that is present from the drycleaners and explained that phase 1 and 2 of studies are complete. Carlson continued to explain that asbestos, vapors, and petroleum were all present and will be removed. He stated that in addition to the contaminations being removed, the blighted building, power lines, and curb cuts will be removed as well. Carlson explained that what will be added for the give to get is wider sidewalks, pedestrian and bike friendly, public park and public art, public parking, affordable ADA units, new housing, and a highest and best use. Commissioners asked earlier about applying for grants and Carlson answered that their intent is to seek every opportunity for public contribution to this site. Carlson has applied for a TVRA and DEED grants, and are in for funding and conjunction with City Staff. Carlson ended with thanking the neighborhood for their participation. Discussion/Comments/Questions • Commissioners asked what the approximate square footage of the grass area in the pocket park. Camp’s civil engineer answered that the total green space on the site is approximately 4,830 square feet. • Commissioners discussed the traffic concern and the curb cut on Sunnyside with people exiting the parking ramp. Camp replied in the affirmative and explained that people will have to enter on France Ave. for the underground parking ramp. Commissioners explained the concern with the increased traffic through neighborhood with people turning left and camp responded that a strategically placed island could be added. Millner said he would be the one to determine the need of an island based off of the traffic study. • Commissioners asked about eliminating the entrance on Sunnyside and just using France Ave. that was introduced in the beginning. Camp responded that the flow of the project needed more than 1 curb cut and the county commented on that as well. Commissioners also commented on the pocket park and how the redesign made it psychologically a smaller space. Camp responded that they could reduce the size of the planters and make it feel more welcoming and are open to suggestions. • Commissioners positively commented on the pocket park and permanent bench seating. Commissioners asked about the dog run being used for pet relief and Camp replied in the affirmative for its purpose. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 9 of 12 Commissioners asked about the public pocket park and Camp responded that it would be maintained by and by the private owner, but that it could also be dedicated. Camp also stated that programming is key to parks with implementing ideas such as a farmers market or kids day. Commissioners also commented on including bike parking near the front door. • Commissioners asked if the 4 stories is the same height as it was presented during the sketch plans and Camp replied that that it is the same height. • Carlson was asked by Commissioners why the full number affordable housing is being provided and its being split between units and money. Carlson explained that it made sense to have the ADA accessible units on the ground floor where there are no steps for vans and for easy walkability. Carlson also stated that they thought it was a good idea to buy in half and provide half for a medium landing space on affordable units. Carlson stated that he could provide the full number of units and he is receptive to anything to get this project built and built the right way. • Commissioners asked about the profile of the cornice treatment of the 4 story building and if it’s the same on the bay units. Camp replied that the profile is not the same, but the metal material is. Commissioners stated that the bay cornice is pleasing on the front restaurant portion. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing and commented that the Commissioners received numerous comments from the public regarding this proposal. Mark Schmidt, 4011 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Commission and expressed that changing the zoning to R1 is a bad idea on principal and isn’t a good idea for Edina. Schmidt also asked the Commissioners if the pocket park is public or private and address who is patrolling the safety of the park. Schmidt asked about the parking and if the on off street parking would include the whole one side of Sunnyside Road of 20 to 25 cars long and commented that there would be no room for guests of home owners to park. Kip Myre, 4000 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Commission and stated that he believed Schmidt made some good points. Myre asked if it was 2 or 3 stories on Sunnyside Road and Camp responded that it was roughly 2.5 stories because the ground is rising because they are burying some of the parking. Myre asked to see the traffic study and requested that a speed meter was installed on the edge of his driveway to help stop potential speeding cars. Myre commented on the garbage pickup and where to location will be. Chris Dall, 4001 Sunnyside Road, introduced himself and stated that Ted Carlson did a good job of listening to the neighborhood and their concerns. Dall stated that he is concerned about the traffic issue, specifically concerning the pinch points on Friday night. Dall asked if the traffic report was online for people to view and also expressed apprehension regarding the entrance on Sunnyside Road and stated he would like if it only allowed people to turn right out of that entrance and not into the neighborhood. Dall stated that the neighborhood residents love the area and are open to the idea of what it could bring to the neighborhood. Brian Pankratz, 5429 Brookview Ave., commented that the project is great and fits into the urbanism idea that has been discussed and fits well into Edina. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 10 of 12 Discussion/Comments/Questions • Planner Teague answered questions regarding the parking concern and explained that the project meets the parking requirements for retail use. Teague also stated that if a restaurant is added, it would need to meet the parking standards and that there needs to be 1 parking stall for every 3 seats, plus the maximum number of employees on a shift. Teague further explained that if a restaurant didn’t meet the requirements, they would have to come back to the Planning Commission with a variance request. • Planer Teague answered another question about the easements over the pocket park and explained that it would be privately owned and easements would be required so that it is available to the public and is a requirement written out in the staff report. • Commissioners made a comment to Carlson that there are obvious improvements to the project since it first was presented. Commissioners added that they were impressed with the before and after renditions of the changes made and the project is supported by Commissioners. • Commissioners stated that the pocket park needs improvement and 680 square feet of grass wouldn’t be used well. Commissioners also stated that creating a left turn only out onto Sunnyside and is only affecting Edina residents’ drives home. Commissioners also expressed thoughts on the use of the site because a pharmacy store is permitted under current zoning and discussed the give to get for the Commission to consider. Commissioners stated the idea to mandate that all construction traffic in the construction plan go to France Ave. and not the side roads. • Commissioners commented that the developer did a good job due to the empty chairs in the room and that residents felt informed and knew what was being presented. The park was discussed and that residents of the neighborhood will use it. • Commissioners commented that the most recent plans presented are less boxy and is more attractive. Commissioners also stated a few concerns regarding the pocket park and perhaps making it into an art an education area and make a reason for people to walk to the back, possibly with rotating art displays. Commissioners asked Carlson about parking on Sunnyside and proposed to not have parking on the street. Commissioners commented positively on the bigger balconies and being more transparent. • Commissioners addressed the issues of reducing density and how that might not be the best idea. Commissioners also stated that if the pork chop stays, it is a possibility to add no turning on red, adding a red only right arrow, or raising the street on Sunnyside right before France Ave. so that the crosswalk becomes raised. • Commissioners discussed the comments received from the public and encourage people to comment more because it improves the project and outcome. Commissioners also commented on having a popular restaurant added would be a positive addition to the neighborhood. Commissioners suggested to be specific with the costs and the value going both ways in the give to get to show value with the compromises the city is making and concluded with support for the project. • Commissioners commented that this project is so close to single family homes and that it also is an opportunity to create something in this node that is much needed. Commissioners stated that the building is lacking charm and seems prototypical and not specific to the area. Commissioners stated that the 4 stories seems to be the appropriate height on France Ave., but that it proceeds too far on Sunnyside Road into the residential district. Commissioners stated that the exit parking onto Sunnyside and on street parking is not good design and seems to be detrimental to the neighborhood. Commissioners added that affordable housing needs to be added to the project. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 11 of 12 • Commissioners expressed that more green could be added to the pocket park and that the affordable housing would be a necessity for support of the project. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the preliminary zoning and preliminary development plan as outlined in the staff memo subject to three additional conditions: 1) Construction traffic shall be restricted to only France Avenue. 2) All commercial deliveries shall be done during non-peak hours. 3) All affordable housing requirements shall be met on location. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The motion failed, 2-6. Aye: Thorsen, Olsen Nay: Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Berube Commissioner Nemerov moved approval of the preliminary zoning and preliminary development plan as outlined in the staff memo subject to two additional conditions: 1) Construction traffic shall be limited to France Avenue. 2) All commercial deliveries shall be done during non-peak hours. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion Aye: Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Berube Nay: Miranda, Lee, Olsen The motion carried 5-3. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. The motion carried. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports and Recommendations None. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions None. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 12, 2018 Page 12 of 12 IX. Chair And Member Comments • The Commissioners stated that they are in support of affordable housing. • Commissioners explained the AIA Missing Middle Housing seminar is on Wednesday September 26th at the Minnesota Historical Society and starts at 5:30 p.m. • Commissioners commented on the bicycle usage at 44th and France and 50th and France. There is an increase of pedestrians walking and bicyclists and the streets need to be made easier and safer for both groups. X. Staff Comments Staff stated that the 4500 France Ave & 3905 and 3907 Sunnyside Road project will go to City Council on October 2, 2018. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the August 29, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:16 p.m. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 APPROVING FINAL REZONING FROM R-I AND PCD-I TO PUD-I5, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT — 15, AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ORION INVESTMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Orion Investments is requesting a redevelopment of a one acre tract of land at 4500 France Avenue and 3905 & 3907 Sunnyside Road. As proposed, the development would include the following on the above properties: A 4-story, 46 unit apartment, 6,400 square feet of restaurant & commercial space with 69 below -grade parking stalls at minimum 35 at -grade, enclosed public parking stalls for the retail uses. Units would range from I to 3 bedroom units. Three units (6.6%) within the project are proposed for affordable housing. These units would be targeted for residents with disabilities and earn no more than 50% AMI. The remaining 3.4% would be provided by a cash contribution to affordable housing elsewhere in Edina. To satisfy the affordable housing policy an additional 1.6 units would be required to equal 10%. The policy would require $100,000 per unit or $160,000. The applicant is agreeable to the cash contribution. A public plaza on the west side of the development which would provide a transition to the single-family neighborhood to the west. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.03 As proposed the development requires the following: A Rezoning from R- I and PCD-Ito PUD, Planned Unit Development; and Preliminary Development Plan 1.04 On August 29, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 3 Nays. 1.05 On October 2, 2018, the City Council approved the request. 1.06 The applicant has submitted Final Plans that are consistent with the Preliminary Plans. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0389 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 Page 2 Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: I. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, fiber/cement board, metal panel and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the 44th and France Small Area Plan including: The proposal would clean up a contaminated site (petroleum, asbestos and other soil contaminants) and improve the aesthetic of this corner by designing the building fit into the character of the area and burying overhead utility lines; The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a restaurant and provide pocket park for gathering to strengthen the neighborhood identity; The mixed use (residential and retail) will provide an active street environment; Bike racks and indoor bike parking would be provided to encourage bike use; Storefronts open toward France and housing units open toward the pocket park to activate the public realm; Public realm in the public plaza which also serves as a buffer and transition to the adjacent single family homes to the west; The project would include three units for affordable housing for the handicapped; Parking would be hidden inside the project and underground; Retail parking would be made available to the district; however, the plan provides just enough for proposed retail; High quality design; and Public art. 5. In addition to the items mentioned above, the proposed project would meet the following additional goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian -scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) A Pedestrian -Friendly Environment. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 Page 3 b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed -use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto -oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking Tots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed -use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The proposal meets the City's criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian -friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality brick, architectural panel and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Ensure that the affordable housing policy is met. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. g. Sustainable development. h. Enhance and provide additional public realm. 7. The height increase is justified. There would be an adequate transition from the four story portion of the project down to two stories and 30 feet as specified in the 446 and France Small Area Plan. The pocket park enhances the transition area. The give to get and adhering RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 Page 4 to the Small Area Plan guiding principles justifies the increase in height. Two to Four stories is consistent with the Small Area Plan. 8. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Rezoning from R-I, Single Dwelling Unit District and PCD-I, Planned Commercial District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 4500 France Avenue, 3905 & 3907 Sunnyside Road Approval is subject to the following conditions: I The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter -of -credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 2. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 4. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Three units within the project must be provided for residents earning no more than 50% AMI for 15 years from the date of the certificate of occupancy. Additionally $160,000 shall be paid to the City of Edina prior to issuance of a building permit for the City to provide affordable housing units else ware in the City. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering's memo dated August 20, 2018. 7. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic Study recommendations. 8. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 9. Dedication of public access easements along the sidewalks and public plaza. 10. A shared parking agreement to allow district parking in the street level parking lot. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 Page 5 I I . A shared access easement must be established over the shared driveway on the property to the south. 12. Construction traffic shall be limited to France Avenue and a portion of Sunnyside where the project is located. 13. All commercial deliveries shall be done during non -peak hours. 14. The restaurant shall be limited to 35 seats and located at the northernmost retail space shown on the site plan. 15. The overhead power lines must be buried from 4540 France Avenue north to the intersection of 44th and France, subject to approval conditions of Xcel Energy. 16. The applicant and staff shall explore the potential for traffic calming at the intersection of Sunnyside and France. 17. The Edina Housing Foundation and/or the City's HRA shall have the first right of refusal to purchase the affordable housing units if the apartments are turned in condos; if the units remain rental, after 15 years the property owner will consider extending the affordable housing units for an additional 15 years. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-137 Page 6 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 18, 2018. ATTEST: ' Sharon Allison, City Clerk '" James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 18, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2018. Sharon Allison, City Clerk EXHIBIT A Legal Description Parcel 1: Lots 1 and 2 and that part of Lot 6 described as follows: Commencing at the most Northerly corner of said Lot 6; thence South along the East line of said lot; 40.62 feet; thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northerly line of said Lot 6, distant 27.19 feet Westerly from the point of beginning; thence Northeasterly to the point of beginning, all in Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement" in Waveland and Waveland Park, including all of the vacated alley which lies North of the South line of said Lot 2 extended West, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property) Parcel 2: Lots 3, 4 and 5; That part of Lot 6, described as follows: Commencing on the Easterly line of said Lot at a point distant 40.62 feet Southerly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot, thence Northwesterly 30.2 feet to a point on the Northwesterly line of said Lot distant 27.19 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly corner of said Lot; thence Southwesterly along the Northwesterly line of said Lot to the most Westerly corner of said Lot, thence Southeasterly along the Southwesterly line of said Lot to the most Southerly corner of said Lot, thence Northerly along the Easterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning; That part of the alley now vacated, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of alley, now vacated with the North line of Lot 3 extended Westward, thence East on said extended line to the Northwest corner of said Lot 3, thence along the Easterly line of said alley to the most Southerly corner of Lot 5, thence Southwesterly along an extension of the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the center line of said alley, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said alley to a point of its intersection with a line erected to bisect the angle existing in the Westerly line of said alley, thence Southwest along said line to the West line of said alley, thence North along said West line to a point in said line 40.62 feet South of the most Northerly corner of Lot 6, the same being the point of intersection to said West line of alley with the extension Westward of the North line of Lot 3, thence East along said extended line to the point of beginning; All in Block 2, "Fairbairn's Rearrangement" In Waveland and Waveland Park (Torrens Property) Parcel A: Lot 7, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Together with that part of the adjacent vacated alley that accrued thereto by reason of the vacation thereof. (Abstract Property) Parcel B: M-2 Lot 8, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement in Waveland and Waveland Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) M-3 Technical Memorandum To: Cary Teague, City of Edina From: Max Moreland, PE, PTOE Date: February 5, 2020 Re: Parking Assessment – 4500 France Avenue Purpose of Report and Study Objectives A new development is being constructed at 4500 France Avenue on the southwest corner of the France Avenue and Sunnyside Road intersection in Edina, Minnesota. This technical memorandum presents an analysis of the proposed parking supply for the site as compared to the anticipated parking demand for t he site. Conclusions The proposed off-street parking stalls for the residential portion of the site are anticipated to accommodate the peak residential demand. The 36 commercial parking spaces in conjunction with the 15 spaces from the adjacent development will accommodate the parking demand for the commercial portion of the site at all times with the exception of three hours per week. Those times are: • 6:00 p.m. on a weekday with an on-street parking demand of 13 spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a weekday with an on-street parking demand of seven spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a Friday with an on-street parking demand of two spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a Saturday with an on-street parking demand of five spaces The on-street parking supply on Sunnyside Road and France Avenue adjacent to the site is anticipated to be able to accommodate the on-street parking demand from this development. The commercial parking spaces provided for this development will also be open to general public parking for the area. Any non-site vehicles that would utilize this parking area are currently parking on-street in the area. Therefore, the net change to on-street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development. Development Characteristics The development will include a mix of 46 apartment units, 2,700 square feet of retail and a 3,700 square foot, 110 seat restaurant. There will be two vehicle access points to the site; one on Sunnyside Road and one on France Avenue. Spack Solutions 2 of 5 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Parking Supply There are 113 vehicle parking stalls proposed for the site; 7 1 standard spaces including three tandem spaces below grade for residential use, three at grade for residential visitor use and 36 at grade for commercial/public use. The owner of this development also owns the property directly to the south at 4528 -4530 France Avenue. This includes a bank, a dry cleaner and two retail spaces. These businesses are not open after 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, 6:00 p.m. on Fridays and 7:00 p.m. on other weekdays. The parking spaces for these businesses will be able to be used as overflow parking for the 4500 France Avenue development in the evening hours. There are 15 parking spaces available as overflow parking. On-street parking is also available in the area. Directly adjacent to the site there are seven spaces along the south side of Sunnyside Road. Parking is also available on the north side of Sunnyside Road with approximately nine spaces and the east side of France Avenue with approximately 20 spaces between 45th Street and 46th Street. Additional on-street parking is available on 45th Street near the site. Based on this review a total of 128 off-street parking stalls are provided for the new development with additional on-street parking available nearby. City Parking Requirements This development is located in the Downtown Parking Overlay District. The minimum parking requirements per the City of Edina’s Code of Ordinances for planned commercial districts are listed in Table 1. Table 1 – City of Edina Parking Requirements Building Unit Description Parking Requirement* Required Spaces Multi-residential 41 Units (less than 1,500 square feet) 1 enclosed space per unit 41 Multi-residential 5 Units (greater than 1,500 square feet) 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit 8 Non-Shopping Center Retail 6,400 square feet 8 spaces for the first 1,000 square feet plus 6 spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet up to 15,000 square feet 40 TOTAL 89 With 77 residential parking spaces proposed, the residential portion of the site will meet City of Edina parking requirements while the 36 commercial parking spaces proposed will be short of City minimums. It is noted that if the 15 parking stalls on the adj acent development were included, the City minimums would be met for the commercial portion of the site. Spack Solutions 3 of 5 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Parking Demand - ITE The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) provides the Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition, a compilation of parking demand data for various land uses from existing developments throughout the United States. This national standard provides a basis to forecast parking demand for new developments. Table 2 shows the peak parking demand on a weekday and a Saturday for each portion of the development based on the ITE forecasts. Table 2 – Forecast Parking Generation Based on ITE Building Unit Land Use Description ITE Code Development Parking Demand Weekday Friday Saturday Residential Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise) 52 Units ITE 221 60 60 47 Retail Shopping Center 2,700 square feet ITE 820 5 7 8 Restaurant Quality Restaurant 110 Seats ITE 931 57 52 51 It is unlikely these different land uses will experience their peak parking demand at the same time. To determine the total parking demand on site during different times, a time -of-day analysis was completed. Using data collected at various land uses by Spack Solutions, the percentage of the peak parking demand can be found for each hour over the course of a day for each land use. Hourly results of the time-of-day parking analysis are attached. This analysis forecasts that the peak parking demand for the entire site for a weekday, Friday and Saturday will be: • 91 vehicles on a weekday at 7:00 p.m. • 82 vehicles on a Friday at 7:00 p.m. • 66 vehicles on a Saturday at 7:00 p.m. Focusing just on the commercial portion of the site (since there is adequate parking for the residential portion), the time-of-day parking analysis forecasts the peak parking demand for the retail and restaurant use will be: • 58 vehicles on a weekday at 7:00 p.m. • 53 vehicles on a Friday at 7:00 p.m. • 56 vehicles on a Saturday at 7:00 p.m. It is noted that these demands have not been adjusted to account for those walking bicycling or taking transit to the site. Nearby transit is available and bicycle parking facilities will be included on site. This may result in a lower parking demand for the site. Parking Supply vs Demand Based on the forecasts shown in Table 2, the residential portion of the site will be able to accommodate the proposed parking demand with the residential spaces supplied. Spack Solutions 4 of 5 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment With 36 parking spaces available for commercial use on site plus an additional 15 sp aces available in the evenings when the adjacent development is closed for business (after 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, 6:00 p.m. on Fridays and 7:00 p.m. on other weekdays), there is enough off-street parking to accommodate nearly all of the commercial demand for the site. Utilizing the time- of-day parking demands along with the off-street supply, there are two hours on a weekday, one hour on a Friday and one hour on a Saturday in which it is anticipated the demand will exceed supply causing the need for on-street parking. Those times and demands are: • 6:00 p.m. on a weekday with an on-street parking demand of 13 spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a weekday with an on-street parking demand of seven spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a Friday with an on-street parking demand of two spaces • 7:00 p.m. on a Saturday with an on-street parking demand of five spaces Based on these numbers, the on-street parking supply of 36 spaces on Sunnyside Road and France Avenue adjacent to the site is anticipated to be able to accommodate the on-street parking demand from this development without causing a significant strain to the areas on - street parking facilities. There will be a public parking easement for the 36 commercial parking spaces for this development. That means drivers destined for surrounding uses can also park at this site. Without a current public parking area at this site, it can be assumed any non -site vehicles parking here are currently parking on-street in the area. Therefore, if this commercial parking area is full due to existing on-street parking vehicles now parking in the lot, the net change to on-street parking will be equivalent to the on-street parking demand of this development, which is relatively low. Site Comparison This site will be providing 36 to 51 off-street parking spaces for commercial use. Accounting for the retail parking demand of the site, that leaves 28 to 51 parking spaces on site for restaurant use at any time. Similar restaurants in the area are considered as a comparison of how much off-street parking is provided. In Edina, restaurants such as Edina Grill, Salut and Cocina Del Barrio utilize large amounts of shared public district parking provided in the 50 th & France area. That type of parking is common in many of the commercial areas with restaurants throughout the City but is not currently available near 4500 France Avenue. Nearby in Minneapolis, Martina has 25 off-street parking spaces, Red Cow has 10 off-street parking spaces, and Pizzeria Lola and Hola Arepa each have 12 off-street parking spaces. The proposed development has a higher number of off-street parking spaces proposed than these other similar restaurants. Spack Solutions 5 of 5 4500 France Avenue Parking Assessment Traffic Study Impacts A 2018 traffic impact study was conducted for this development by Spack Solutions. In that study, the trip generation for the site was analyzed with the restaurant portion of the site being a 3,700 square foot restaurant. With the updated proposed size of the site being 1 10 seats, the trip generation for the restaurant portion of the site was re -analyzed. Table 3 shows the previous trip generation forecasts for the restaurant along with the current forecasts. Table 3 – Restaurant Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Code - Source Land Use Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 932 – ITE High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (3,700 square feet) 103 103 10 8 11 7 932 - ITE High-Turnover Sit-Down Restaurant (110 seats) 119 119 14 13 13 10 Difference 16 16 4 5 2 3 As shown in Table 3, the difference between trip generation forecasts for a 3,700 square foot restaurant and 110 seat restaurant are rather small with the difference being less than 10 vehicles in a peak hour, or one vehicle roughly every six minutes. The 2018 traffic study showed acceptable intersection operations in the study area without any study intersections being on the edge of acceptability. Therefore, this change to the proposed site is not anticipated to significantly impact the results of the 2018 traffic study. Attachments • Time of Day Parking Demand 12:00 AM 64 0 5 69 5 36 0 1:00 AM 66 0 2 68 2 36 0 2:00 AM 66 0 1 67 1 36 0 3:00 AM 67 0 0 67 0 36 0 4:00 AM 68 0 0 68 0 36 0 5:00 AM 66 0 0 66 0 36 0 6:00 AM 61 1 1 63 2 36 0 7:00 AM 47 3 1 51 4 36 0 8:00 AM 26 3 2 31 5 36 0 9:00 AM 15 3 3 21 6 36 0 10:00 AM 9 3 4 16 7 36 0 11:00 AM 6 3 8 17 11 36 0 12:00 PM 4 5 30 39 35 36 0 1:00 PM 4 4 25 33 29 36 0 2:00 PM 4 3 14 21 17 36 0 3:00 PM 5 2 9 16 11 36 0 4:00 PM 10 2 12 24 14 36 0 5:00 PM 20 2 28 50 30 36 0 6:00 PM 33 2 47 82 49 36 13 7:00 PM 38 1 57 96 58 51 7 8:00 PM 45 0 39 84 39 51 0 9:00 PM 52 0 34 86 34 51 0 10:00 PM 59 0 27 86 27 51 0 11:00 PM 62 0 13 75 13 51 0 12:00 AM 67 0 1 68 1 36 0 1:00 AM 67 0 0 67 0 36 0 2:00 AM 68 0 0 68 0 36 0 3:00 AM 67 0 0 67 0 36 0 4:00 AM 68 0 0 68 0 36 0 5:00 AM 64 0 1 65 1 36 0 6:00 AM 56 1 0 57 1 36 0 7:00 AM 41 4 0 45 4 36 0 8:00 AM 28 4 1 33 5 36 0 9:00 AM 15 4 1 20 5 36 0 10:00 AM 9 4 2 15 6 36 0 11:00 AM 3 4 3 10 7 36 0 12:00 PM 2 7 22 31 29 36 0 1:00 PM 3 6 26 35 32 36 0 2:00 PM 3 4 13 20 17 36 0 3:00 PM 4 3 10 17 13 36 0 4:00 PM 9 3 14 26 17 36 0 5:00 PM 17 3 24 44 27 36 0 6:00 PM 27 2 46 75 48 51 0 7:00 PM 32 1 52 85 53 51 2 8:00 PM 36 0 40 76 40 51 0 9:00 PM 46 0 27 73 27 51 0 10:00 PM 52 0 13 65 13 51 0 11:00 PM 56 0 3 59 3 51 0 12:00 AM 49 0 5 54 5 36 0 1:00 AM 52 0 0 52 0 36 0 2:00 AM 52 0 0 52 0 36 0 3:00 AM 53 0 0 53 0 36 0 4:00 AM 54 0 0 54 0 36 0 5:00 AM 53 0 0 53 0 36 0 6:00 AM 50 0 0 50 0 36 0 7:00 AM 47 0 0 47 0 36 0 8:00 AM 41 0 0 41 0 36 0 9:00 AM 36 1 0 37 1 36 0 10:00 AM 22 3 0 25 3 36 0 11:00 AM 14 5 3 22 8 36 0 12:00 PM 5 6 13 24 19 36 0 1:00 PM 4 7 21 32 28 36 0 2:00 PM 4 8 8 20 16 36 0 3:00 PM 6 8 13 27 21 36 0 4:00 PM 14 7 15 36 22 36 0 5:00 PM 9 6 21 36 27 51 0 6:00 PM 8 6 36 50 42 51 0 7:00 PM 11 5 51 67 56 51 5 8:00 PM 21 4 37 62 41 51 0 9:00 PM 27 2 25 54 27 51 0 10:00 PM 36 1 21 58 22 51 0 11:00 PM 42 0 13 55 13 51 0 Weekday TOTAL DEMAND TOTAL DEMAND Restaurant Demand Restaurant Demand Time of Day Automobile Parking Needs (ITE) Not Adjusted for Pedestrian, Bicycle or Transit Usage Saturday Residential Demand TOTAL DEMAND Friday Retail Demand Retail Demand Retail Demand Residential Demand Residential Demand Restaurant Demand TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND TOTAL COMMERCIAL DEMAND Off-Street Commercial Supply On-Street Commercial Demand Off-Street Commercial Supply On-Street Commercial Demand Off-Street Commercial Supply On-Street Commercial Demand