Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-01-26 Planning Commission Regular MeetingAg enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota VIR TUAL MEE TING Wednesday, Januar y 26, 2022 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. To participate in Public H ear ings: Call 800-374-0221. E nter Conference ID 9088988. Give the operator your nam e, street address and telephone number. Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to get in the queue to speak. A City sta; m em ber will introduce you when it is your tur n. I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Min u tes: Pla n n ing Com m ission Decem b er 30, 2021 V.Pu b lic Hea rings A.B-22-01 4521 Garrison La n e VI.Rep orts/Recom m en d ation s A.Resolu tion B-22-02: Sale of 425 Je/erson Avenue Com p lies w ith Com preh ensive Plan B.Sketch Plan Review - 5146 Eden Avenue (Form er Public W orks Site) VII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents VIII.Sta/ Com m ents IX.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli<cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: January 26, 2022 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion December 30, 2021 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the minutes from the D ecember 30, 2021 S pecial P lanning Commission. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Minutes December 30, 2021 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2022  Page 1 of 4       Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Special Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers December 30, 2021 I. Call To Order Chair Agnew called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Berube, Strauss, Olsen, Hayward, and Chair Agnew. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Bennett, Alkire and Barberot. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Berube moved to approve the December 30, 2021, agenda. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, November 17, 2021 Commissioner Strauss moved to approve the November 17, 2021, meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. B-21-33: A 5 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance – 6512 Aspen Road Assistant City Planner Bodeker presented the request for a 5-foot side yard setback variance. Staff recommends approval of the side yard setback variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2022  Page 2 of 4     Ms. Andrea Butz was available by WebEx to answer Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission reviewed the variance. Motion Commissioner Berube moved that the Planning approve the 5 Foot Side Yard Setback Variance at 6512 Aspen Road as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. B. B-21-34 A 7.8 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance – 6112 Arbour Avenue Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request for a 7.8-foot front yard setback variance. Staff recommends denial of the front yard setback variance, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Eric Bjorgaard, applicant, addressed the Commission. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Olsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission reviewed the variance. Motion Commissioner Olsen moved that the Planning Commission approve the 7.8 Foot Front Yard Setback Variance at 6112 Arbour Avenue as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. C. Preliminary and Final Plat – 5300 Kelsey Terrace Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2022  Page 3 of 4     Director Teague presented the request for a Preliminary and Final Plat. Staff recommends approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat at 5300 Kelsey Terrace, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Carol Lansing, applicant, addressed the Commission. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission discussed the Preliminary and Final Plat proposal. Motion Commissioner Berube moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Preliminary and Final Plat at 5300 Kelsey Terrace as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Selection of the Cahill Area District Plan Working Group Chair Agnew presented the 12 group members for the Cahill Area District Plan Working Group and asked for a motion to approve the group members. The list included Ryan Breisach, Louis DeMars, Jamie Glover, Sarah Hu, Hilda Martinez Salgado, Amir Missaghi, Michael Morgan, Michael Schroeder, Anne Anyder, Steve Troskey, Kate Agnew, and David Alkire. Chair Agnew reviewed the reasons for choosing the members for the group. Motion Commissioner Berube moved approval of the 12 group members as selected. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. Motion carried. VIII. Chair and Member Comments None. IX. Staff Comments Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2022  Page 4 of 4     Received. X. Adjournment Commissioner Strauss moved to adjourn the December 30, 2021, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 5:57 PM. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried. Date: January 26, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-22-01 4521 G arris on Lane Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: A 6.6 foot setback variance from a pond to replace a deck with a 3 season porch. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Report Site Location Narrative Engineering Memo Survey/engineering Survey Plans Rendering Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments- 4521 Garrison Lane Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 6.6-foot setback variance from required 50-foot pond setback at 4521 Garrison Lane VISITORS 12 CONTRIBUTORS 11 RESPONSES 11 0 Registered 0 Unverified 11 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 11 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 13:01:30 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 13:01:30 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Lana Peterson Q2.Address 4500 Garrison LN, Edina MN 55424 Q3.Comment Hello, I just wanted to share my support for the approval of this variance. I think the request is very reasonable and will not create any negative impact to our neighborhood. The irregular lot shape caused by the pond creates a lot of space for this. I am excited for this addition and the beauty it will add to our neighborhood. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 13:29:32 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 13:29:32 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Laura Engen Q2.Address 4517 Garrison Lane Q3.Comment We are the next-door neighbors of this property to the east, we are happy to support this project I don’t see this project as a problem at all! They have our full support to build their porch Respondent No:3 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 13:38:10 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 13:38:10 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name andrew miller Q2.Address 6317 st johns ave Q3.Comment Abby & Marcus are thoughtful and conscientious neighbors who have an articulate concept for a porch addition that would only make life on Lake Nancy better. I cannot think of one reason to do anything other than support them. Thank you, Andrew DE Miller Respondent No:4 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 13:39:21 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 13:39:21 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Dave Melander Q2.Address 4443 Garrison Lane Q3.Comment I live about a block from this residence. Given there is already a structure there, I have no issue allowing the homeowner to enclose the area. Respondent No:5 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 14:22:36 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 14:22:36 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Connie Carrino Q2.Address 4509 Garrison Lane Q3.Comment We are neighbors, three properties to the east of the Andrusko's This is a lovely addition and complements the character of their home. Please approve their variance request. Respondent No:6 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 15:32:31 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 15:32:31 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Marc and Meredith seaberg Q2.Address 4505 Nancy Lane Q3.Comment We are supportive of this addition to the home. It adds depth and a nice visual element to the back and side of the home, and would be a wonderful space for the family, also adding value to the home and neighborhood. Respondent No:7 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 15:46:40 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 15:46:40 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Sue Hanson Q2.Address 4520 Garrison Lane Q3.Comment We fully support our neighbor’s project! Respondent No:8 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 19, 2022 19:48:00 pm Last Seen:Jan 19, 2022 19:48:00 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Cheryl / James Lany Q2.Address 4513 Garrison Lane, Edina, MN 55424 Q3.Comment We have no objection to the proposed 3-season porch at 4521 Garrison Lane, and support the 6.6 variance that the Andrusko’s are seeking. We believe the 3-season porch will be an asset to the Andrusko home and the neighborhood. Respondent No:9 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 20, 2022 08:34:22 am Last Seen:Jan 20, 2022 08:34:22 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Tom and Marcie Hamel Q2.Address 6305 St. Johns Ave Q3.Comment Looking forward to it. It will add value to the neighborhood. Respondent No:10 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 20, 2022 09:38:44 am Last Seen:Jan 20, 2022 09:38:44 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Ellen Westin Q2.Address 4501 Garrison Lane Q3.Comment I support this variance and think the proposed porch would fit in well with the neighborhood and look very nice on our lake. I am down the block on the same lake and fully support this! Respondent No:11 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 20, 2022 09:42:01 am Last Seen:Jan 20, 2022 09:42:01 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name James westin Q2.Address 4501 Garrison lane Q3.Comment My wife and I fully support this screen porch addition project. It is both a well thought out design as well as an excellent use of outdoor space the would have a minimal impact on neighbor sight lines. The subject property, 4521 Garrison Lane, is located on the south side of Garrison Lane and north of a pond. The existing structure is a two-story home with an attached two-car garage built in 1964. The applicant is requesting a 6.6-foot pond setback variance for a porch addition to replace a portion of a deck. The existing deck has a non-conforming 39.4-foot setback from the Ordinary High-Water Elevation of the pond. The applicant is requesting the 6.6-foot variance for an addition of a porch that reduces the setback nonconformity by increasing the pond setback to 43.4 feet for a screened porch over a portion of the old deck. The proposed addition will be farther from the pond than the existing deck. The neighbor directly to the east of the subject home has an existing porch located 35.6 feet from the OHWE of the pond. The neighbor’s porch is 8.4 feet closer to the pond than the subject’s proposed porch. It should be noted that prior to 1990, setback from the pond was required to be 25 feet. The ordinance was amended in the early 1990’s requiring a minimum 50-foot setback from the OHWE. With exception of the pond setback, the proposed project meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes/pond; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. January 26, 2022 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-22-01, a 6.6 -foot setback variance from the 50-foot setback required from a pond for a screened porch replacement of an existing nonconforming deck at 4521 Garrison Lane. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Existing Site Features The subject property, 4521 Garrison Lane, was built in 1964. The lot is 10,076 square feet and is located on the south side of Garrison Lane, north of a pond. The existing dwelling is a two- story home with a two-car garage. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and submitted with comments as attached in the memorandum. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Front yard West Side – Side Yard South Side – Side Yard East Side – Rear Yard 30.4 feet 10 feet 50 feet (Required setback to naturally occurring lakes and ponds) 10 feet 30 feet 15.5 feet *43.4 feet (Existing non-conforming, no change proposed) 5.9 feet (Existing non-conforming, no change proposed) Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf 25% 17.4% *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION STAFF REPORT Page 3 Primary Issue Is the proposed variance justified? Yes. Staff believes the variance criteria is met in this instance. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and the proposed addition complies with zoning standards except for the pond setback requirement. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the deck/home and the required setback from the pond. Due to the addition being a porch in place of a deck, the non-conforming setback standard does not apply. The original deck was constructed without variances. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The existing house has non-conforming setbacks and was built prior to the current ordinance requirements. There were no variances granted for the original construction of the home and deck. The proposed addition will improve upon the non-conforming setback of the deck that was allowed when originally built. Setback requirements have changed over time and have created non-conformities. This was not a self-created setback by the applicant. The proposed addition conforms to all other zoning requirements. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The addition will match the non-conforming pond setback of the deck. Staff Recommendation Approve a 6.6-foot d setback variance for a screened porch addition at 4521 Garrison Lane. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the deck and existing non-conforming pond setback. 2. The proposed addition is reasonable and was not self-created. The current house has a non-conforming deck setback from the pond and was built prior to the current setback requirements. 3. Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans date stamped December 15, 2022. 2. Comments and conditions listed in the January 13, 2022, Engineering Memo. Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 January 20, 2 022 1 in = 94 f t / CITY OF EDINA DEC 15 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT architects 4521 Garrison Lane variance application responses The Proposed Variance will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Yes, the proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance due to the irregular shape of the lot and buildable area defined by the irregular 50' OHWM line. The proposed use of a screen porch on a single-family home is reasonable for enjoyment of the pond with protection from insects and rain. Several other homes on the pond also have screen porches in the backyard, including the immediate neighbor to the east. The existing non-conforming deck was not created by the applicant and homeowner and was existing to the home when they purchased it. The homeowners would like to preserve most of the existing deck structure and upgrade it with a new roof structure and screens, and were not aware that the deck was non-compliant. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Yes, the proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The OHWM of the pond creates an irregular shape which defines a unique buildable area for each individual lot on the pond. Due to the geometry of the OHWM many lots on the pond have sufficient buildable areas for reasonable residential uses including primary structures and related uses such as screen porches. Several other lots on the pond, including 4521 Garrison Lane, have compromised buildable areas with less useable space. In many of these cases, there are existing non-conforming structures (including screen porches) on the lot. See attached Exhibit A for a map of neighboring lots with non-conforming structures in the OHWM setback. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Yes, the proposed variance is in harmony with the following stated objectives of the Edina zoning code: Maintain, protect and enhance single-family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use. The proposed project helps protect and enhance the existing single-family detached dwelling neighborhood by adding a reasonable amenity to the existing home. Provide an enjoyable living environment by preserving existing topography, vegetation, streams, water bodies and other natural land and water forms. By removing a portion of the existing non-conforming deck, the proposed project retreats from the shoreline and helps preserve the existing pond. ft also provides a comfortable space for the homeowners to enjoy the pond setting with protection from rain, sun, and insects. Protect surface water and groundwater supplies; minimize the possibility of periodic flooding resulting in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards and related adverse effects. By removing a portion of the existing non-conforming deck, the proposed project is further from the OHWM and helps protect the pond from surface water runoff. The proposed project also results in a net reduction in hardcover percentage. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood Yes, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of a neighborhood. The proposed design is harmonious in size, style, and materials with the existing home. Many of the existing homes in the neighborhood have screen porches and several homes are situated closer to the OHWM of the pond than the proposed project. The immediate neighbor to the east (4517 Garrison Lane) also has an existing non-conforming screen porch in the rear yard. We took care in the design of the proposed screen porch to remove a portion of the existing deck footprint and ensure a lesser area of non-conformance and a greater distance to the OHWM than the neighboring screen porch. 4521 Garrison Lane (Applicant) CITY OF EDINA DEC 15 Z021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 4517 Garrison Lane —4513 Garrison Lane 4509 Garrison Lane - 4500 Nancy Lane 4501 Nancy Lane 4505 Nancy Lane 4509 Nancy Lane 6329 Millers Lane 6333 Millers Lane Adjacent Lots with Non-Conforming structures in 50' OHWM Setback DATE: 1/13/2022 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 4521 Garrison La - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included an existing and proposed survey stamped 12/15/21. Summary of Work The applicant proposes a screened porch in place of the existing deck. The request is for a variance to 50’ setback from the ordinary high water level. Easements No comment. Grading and Drainage Site drains to the wetland Lake Nancy. Applicant indicated no grading changes and no fill within the local 1%- annual-chance floodplain, below the elevation of 866.4’. Stormwater Mitigation The proposed survey’s impervious calculations show the addition of 286 SF of new impervious, which does not trigger the City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. Floodplain Development The property, including the proposed screened porch, is within the local 1%-annual-chance floodplain with an elevation 866.4’. The screened porch is required to have a lowest opening elevation of at least 868.4’. The proposed lowest opening elevation is 871.0’. Erosion and Sediment Control Silt fence is proposed around the disturbance areas. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit may be required, applicant will need to verify with the district. Water and sanitary is served from Garrison La. Watermain installed 1956. Structure built 1964. A well is not likely located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. GARRISON LANEPONDPONDLEGAL DESCRIPTION:That part of Lot 10, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION, lying North of a line running from theSouthwest corner of said Lot 10 to a point in the East line of said Lot 10 distant 25 feet North of theSoutheast corner thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. Thescope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Pleasecheck the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, ifnecessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, thatyou wish to be included on the survey have been shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of theproperty.4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the reviewof such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify theyare correctly shown before proceeding with construction.6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography ofthe site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations forconstruction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on thissurvey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey whendetermining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction.7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may beexisting easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment.Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than theones shown hereon.8.While we show a proposed location for this addition, we are not as familiar with your proposedplans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of theimprovements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans beforeconstruction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements asthe local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to saidofficials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements andobtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property.STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:"●" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted.#43503LICENSE NO.Wayne W. PreuhsDATES1DECEMBER 13, 2021Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway No. 7Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering, Co.MARCUS ANDRUSKO4521 GARRISON LNCLIENT/JOB ADDRESSEDINA, MNSHEET TITLEPROPOSED SURVEYSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 1DWG ORIENTATION SCALE212484 JRDRAWING NUMBER20'10'0NOVEMBER 15, 2021DATE SURVEYED:DECEMBER 13, 2021DATE DRAFTED:SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22PROPOSED HARDCOVERHouse 1,343 Sq. Ft.Screen Porch/Steps 286 Sq. Ft.Porch 130 Sq. Ft.Driveway 663 Sq. Ft.Misc. Concrete 74 Sq. Ft.AC Pad 7 Sq. Ft.Wood Steps 8 Sq. Ft.TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,511 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft.PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 24.9%LEGENDPROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGEHouse 1,343 Sq. Ft.Screen Porch/Steps 286 Sq. Ft.Porch 130 Sq. Ft.TOTAL PROPOSED COVERAGE 1,759 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft.PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 17.4%EXISTING HARDCOVERHouse 1,343 Sq. Ft.Porch 130 Sq. Ft.Driveway 663 Sq. Ft.Misc. Concrete 74 Sq. Ft.AC Pad 7 Sq. Ft.Wood Steps 8 Sq. Ft.TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,225 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft.PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 22.1%EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGEHouse 1,343 Sq. Ft.Deck 345 Sq. Ft.Porch 130 Sq. Ft.Deck Credit -150 Sq. Ft.TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE 1,668 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft.PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 16.5% 4101it',%; IIItIlIIIIIIIIII II 111111111111111111111111111111, 4 Signature I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date 4994 8 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company 414 E 20th St. Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 512-354-7064 andy@acdcstudio corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Date Issued For Sheet Title Cover Sheet Sheet Number CVR CITY OF EDINA Andrusko Residence DEC 15 2021 4521 Garrison Lane, Edina vN 55424 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SHEET INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY GENERAL NOTES 1. All dimensions shall be field verified prior to construction. Do not scale drawings. 2. Perimeter dimensions are to face of concrete or ext, face of wall sheathing. 3, Interior dimensions are to face of stud. 3. Verify all existing site conditions and provide necessary adjustments for construction. 5. All structural members to be sized accordingly by structural engineer. Do not substitute structural members without engineer signoff. CVR COVER SHEET AND RENDERING So SURVEY SITE PLAN Ato EXISTING PLAN A2.0 PROPOSED PLAN A4.0 PROPOSED ELEVATION A4.1 PROPOSED ELEVATION A4.2 PROPOSED ELEVATION ARCHITECT: Andy Campbell 612-432-1891 andy®acdcstudio.com Rendering CACDC. 2021 7--- ---868- -- ( I I I I 9 ----- -- , I '...4.-..::°---:.t 86" F I. PORCH 20.1 1,///34.67>/ GAZGE ILOOft- ,..., .97 est AT DOOR-- Etli 88 87 "/ ELEV.- 871.22/ / ; 1.7/ / /EXISTING , - / 1 6• DWELLING 1.7 ., -RET. WALL 1 x866.1 13.4066.9 STEPS EXISTING DWELLING 8 688 868 867.9 x 866.8 PORCH Tn X 864.6 , 0 834.1, (FAGE a- WALL) -(;63 CONTOUR) LEGEND CATCH BASIN POWER POLE MANHOLE 0 LIGHT POLE X 0 = TREE E = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE — CONCRETE SURFACE GARRISON LANE ___-- p 865.0 86 865.3 CU88 0 L6/ 566 L178.87 867 E,_,..308.70 867.4- 66.5 8,1,6 0 W) c (.1 c 0 1-0 0 (I) L° z 2 0 (0 c C N < Signature I hereby certify that the ptan. specification rr report as prepared by me or under, my drect supervision and that I am a duty registstred architect under the tarn of the State of Minnesota 4/1 Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date S RIM -665.0 ELEV- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 10, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION, lying North of a line running from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10 to a point in the East line of said Lot 10 distant 25 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3 Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 7. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker, found, unless otherwise noted. EXISTING DWELLING 72.7 6655 49948 867,5 ( 867.8 x 867. 17917 Highway No.7 Minnetonka. Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web, wyny.advsuccom x 866.4 x 866.4 6 -RET. WALL x 866.4 120 / ^ 5' MIRES EASEMENT-7 \- // / /78.00 — / j 89'54'42" E )46 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1745 RAN. 568809 CR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LIE OR OHM MY MDT SUPERALSol ASS DIAT 1 MI A DULY REPSTERM LAND SURLETCR LINDER 111E LOS QF 11€ STATE CF 6165016 Warne W Pr #43503 LICENSE NO. NOVEMBER 17 2021 DATE Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. DATE SURVEYED: NOVEMBER 15, 2021 DATE DRAFTED: NOVEMBER 17, 2021 SHEET TITLE EXISTING SURVEY SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22 DRAWING NUMBER 212286 BH 7 I 1,..)--WATER UNE 11/15/21 LL .A \ Cn i Registration Slumber Architect Cody Campbell. Design Ccolgany vt E asth St. Sate Minneapotis 7.174 554o4 6t2-354-7064 ancty,acdostodo corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Pate Issued F, Sheet Title SURVEY Sheet Number SO ©ACDC, 2021 EXISTING HARDCOVER House 1,343 Sq. Ft. Deck 345 Sq. Ft. Porch 130 Sq. Ft. Driveway 663 Sq. Ft. Misc. Concrete 74 Sq. Ft. AC Pad 7 Sq. Ft. Wood Steps 8 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,570 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 25.5% REVISIONDESCRIPTION SHOW ADJ. SETBACK AND ADJUST LOT AREA DATE 12/4/21 DWG ORIENTATION SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS MARCUS ANDRUSKO 4521 GARRISON LN EDINA, MN SHEET NO, S1 SHEET T OF 1 LEGEND 0 CATCH BASIN POWER POLE MANHOLE LIGHT POLE TREE E OVERHEAD UTIUTY LINE — CONCRETE SURFACE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: That part of Lot 10, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION, lying North of a line running from the Southwest corner of said Lot 10 to a point in the East line of said Lot 10 distant 25 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary. to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they arc correctly shown befbre proceeding with construction. 6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 7. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. S. While we show a proposed location for this addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before construction begins. Also, we arc not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community arc. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker. found, unless otherwise noted. EXISTING DWELLING 72.7 EXISTING HARDCOVER House Porch Driveway Misc. Concrete AC Pad Wood Steps 1,343 Sq. Ft. 130 Sq. Ft. 663 Sq. Ft. 74 Sq. Ft. 7 Sq. Ft. 8 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,225 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 22.1% House Screen Porch/Steps Porch Driveway Misc. Concrete AC Pad Wood Steps 1,343 Sq. Ft. 286 Sq. Ft. 130 Sq. Ft. 663 Sq. Ft. 74 Sq. Ft. 7 Sq. Ft. 8 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 2,511 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 24,9% DWG ORIENTATION SCALE lo' 217 PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE House Screen Porch/Steps Porch TOTAL PROPOSED COVERAGE AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 1,343 Sq. Ft. 286 Sq. Ft. 130 Sq. Ft. 1,759 Sq. Ft. 10,076 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 17.496 X 8668 DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION PROPOSED HARDCOVER MARCUS ANDRUSKO 4521 GARRISON LN EDINA, MN 17917 Highway No 7 Minnetonka 1.100es9Ia 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.adysohcorn 86 867.5 1167, 4 A B 865.3 CURB 865.0 -866 u=75.87 — ----30 830 x 867A THRESHOLD AT 17009.-.-.3 EGLEARVAGE. FLOOR7 N '9 REV.= 871 22-' 7 EXISTING DWELLING 1 1871191 FERN'! THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT WAS PREMED BY WE OR Me DT DEECT SUPERASION AND 196T I MI A DULY REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR WISER THE 1016 OF THE STATE OF TA. .4 , V) 1 16 7.4 4-1:.> xa,„ :60 --A--.80 , $p 4 1-\‘867'.1 :: '''i X 86A6 X,.---. / \/....< 4 -4- C X 866.4 X 8664 % / ss,V,, , ',, \-- PROPOSED STEPS GARRISON LANE %lomat so, 0, ELtv. / " 6971 / EXISTING PORCH 20A 862.6 866. 19.5 / 73STINO tO in 68, STOOP 868 35.2 • 05 0 >, 868.5 :`4-1,,"- ‘417 89'54'42" E N.) /2:01 V074 / A 5' UTILITIES EASEMENT---7 /78.00 INSTALL SILT ora PENCE/BIO ROLL 12r 12" 2.6 EXISTING PET. WALL —566 ' — LD''T Z "Cr 864.3H, 8650 NOVEMBER 15, 2021 DECEMBER 13, 2021 EXISTING -RET. WALL -WATER UNE 11/15/21 SHEET TITLE PROPOSED SURVEY DRAWING NUMBER 212484 JR EXISTING DWELLING `..08,X0.' (FACE OF WA''') (t63 coNTOUR) • 7 vce SHEET NO. S1 SHEET 1 OF 1 (1) C .1- c‘i c Lo 0 (1) L° z - CD -aRH c c N '4% Nt UJ Signature I hereby cent ty that fhb plan, speoficatton d report as prepared by me or unctob my dtrect super: /on and that I ant a duly registered archttect under the laws of the State of laInnesota Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company 111E 26th Stable B 1,1,roatapoes 1.11.155404 612-354-7064 andy@acdcattldo Com Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Date ksued For Sheet Title SITE PLAN Sheet Number S 9ACDC 2021 EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE House 1,343 Sq. Ft. Deck 345 Sq. Ft. Porch 130 Sq. Ft. Deck Credit -150 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING COVERAGE 1,668 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT (ABOVE OHW) 10,076 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE TO LOT 16.5% CLIE OB ADDRESS Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 867,8X Li XW,6. Wayne Ct. Fre7 543503 LICENSE NO. DECEMBER 13, 2021 GATE 866.4 866„e DATE SURVEYED: DATE DRAFTED: SHEET SIZE: 17 X 22 o~E 0Y6. 4ki k Signature 11-51/41 -6%"61-5%2" 32r 1 121 6'-61/2" 16'-0" O 121 __ 4X6 POST AND BEAM 38r BELOW CONC. PAD BELOW Signature I hereby certify that the plan. specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty regetered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company 26th St, Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 612-354-7064 anciyaacdcsturio corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Date Issued For Sheet Title Existing Main Lever Plan Sheet Number A1.0 ©ACDC, 2021 37" ABOVE GRADE 2,1,01T.Q_ SECOND_ LEVEL BUMP OUT UPO Existing Main Level Plan DECK POWDER 104 UPO 32' ABOVE GRADE 0 106 0 —UP- L _ J KITCHEN REPLACE EXISTING DOORS 101 A1.0 SCALE: 1/4" = 11 -0" r UPO DN 3,-3" i J — —up- — ii L KITCHEN 33/2 31/2" 3' -3%" S-33/9" :72" 3'-33/9" 10 o r 3 -3%" 16.-0" (f. AULTED CLG - STAINE]D NEW COMPOSITE DECKIIIC WOOD FLOOR REPLACE EXIST. DOOR L- POWDER 104 iso Co in O SUNROOM 106 NEW ROOF STRUCTURE & WALLS ON PORTION OF EXISTING DECK. NEW HELICAL PIERS UNDER NEW ROOF LOAD LOCATIONS (4) NEW FIXED SCREENS & OPERABLE STORM WINDOWS, TYP NEW COMPOSITE DECKING ON NEW STAIR STRUCTURE . NEW METAL RAILING. NEW STORM / SCREEN DOOR NEW WALLS: EXISTING WALLS: PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN A2.0 SCALE: 1/4" = l'-O" 101 1 r ce LIVING 105 a) 0 (7) (c) •st CD c\I c 'sr 0 Lo 0 tn Lc) *E.] Z cn (0 2 2 0 -o r1 C N Q d LO L1J Signature I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I are a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4Yit Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14,2021 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company ui E afith St, Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 612-354-7064 andyaacdcstudto corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Date Issued For Sheet Title Proposed Main Level Plan Sheet Number A2.0 ©ACDC, 2021 0 C ca) •(7) ,c1- 11) N c O 1-0 " Z E N 4:( tW LO -C3 ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH HOME, TYP PAINTED COMPOSITE FASCIA Signature I hereby certify that this plan. specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date io O FIXED SCREEN & OPERABLE STORM PANELS 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company E 26th St. Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 612-354-7064 andygacdcstudocom PAINTED COMPOSITE TRIM & POST WRAPS PAINTED COMPOSITE SKIRTING BOARDS Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History NEW HELICAL PIERS Date Issued For AT NEW ROOF LOAD z LOCATIONS (4) Sheet Title Proposed Elevations Sheet Number 1 Proposed Elevation A4.0 A4.0 SCALE: 1/4" = 11-0" ©ACDC, 2021 O .q • [ 16-0" Signature I hereby certify that this plan. specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I are a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota felki Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company on E 26th St, Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 a12-354-7064 ndyaacdcstuctio corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 Revision History Date Issued For Sheet Title Proposed Elevations Sheet Number A4.1 ©ACDC, 2021 co N (%) 0 FIXED SCREENS AND STORM PANELS • PAINTED COMPOSITE FASCIA FIXED SCREEN & OPERABLE STORM PANELS PAINTED COMPOSITE TRIM & POST WRAPS PAINTED COMPOSITE SKIRTING BOARDS COMPOSITE DECKING ON NEW STAIR STRUCTURE. NEW METAL RAILING NEW HELICAL PIERS AT NEW ROOF LOAD LOCATIONS (4) 1 Proposed Elevation A4.1 SCALE: 1/4" = I-0" a) 'gya) (0 c "7) (9 CD N re C 1-4-* 0 LO Z (C3 2 %_ 0 m -0 -1 E C < d? • CD c '7) (1c3 a)-' cC c 0 Lo o E " (CS 73 r c C " LO LLJ Signature I hereby certify that this plan. specification or report as prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered architect under the laws of the State of Mhnesota Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 14, 2021 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect Andy Campbell Design Company Ill E 26th St. Suite B Minneapolis MN 55404 612-354-7064 andygeedestudo corn Current Issue VARIANCE APPLICATION 12-14-21 ARCHITECTURAL - ASPHALT SHINGLES TO MATCH EXISTING HOME PAINTED COMPOSITE FASCIA FIXED SCREEN & OPERABLE STORM PANELS PAINTED COMPOSITE TRIM & POST WRAPS PAINTED COMPOSITE SKIRTING BOARDS UPPER LEVEL FINISH CLG 11r-cr UPPER LEVEL FINISH FLOOR dik 109'-0" MAIN LEVEL FINISH CLG 106-0" Iv MAIN LEVEL FINISH FLOOR di 100'-0" "1" Revision History COMPOSITE DECKING ON Date Issued For NEW STAIR STRUCTURE. NEW METAL RAILING NEW HELICAL PIERS 7 AT NEW ROOF LOAD LOCATIONS (4) Sheet Title Proposed Elevations Sheet Number Proposed Elevation A4.2 A4..2} SCALE: 1/4" = 11 -0" ©ACDC, 2021 Date: January 26, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:S tephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:R es olution B-22-02: S ale of 425 Jeffers on Avenue C omplies with C omprehensive P lan Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve R esolution No. B-22-02 Finding that the conveyance of 425 J efferson Avenue to West H ennepin Affordable H ousing Land T rust conforms to the general plans for the development and redevelopment of the C ity. I N TR O D U C TI O N: I n 2021 the E dina Housing and R edevelopment Authority purchased a problem property at 425 Jefferson Avenue with the intend that it would be sold for affordable housing. West H ennepin Affordable Housing L and Trust (W H AH LT ) submitted a proposal to buy the house to place in the L and Trust program in order to keep affordable for 99-years. T he house will be sold to an income eligible homeowner. D epending on the condition of the house, it will either be renovated or torn down and replaced with a modest sized home. T he preference is to rehabilitate, but W H AH LT cannot make a final determination until they can look in the walls. S upporting single family affordable ownership is a stated goal in the Comprehensive P lan. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. B-22-02 Proposal 219977v2 I PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. B-22-02 RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY WHEREAS, property at 425 Jefferson Avenue (PID No. 3011721220122) within the City of Edina (the "Property") is proposed to be redeveloped by West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust (“WHAHLT”), placed into a land lease, and the house sold to an income eligible homeowner for affordable housing purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council via the passage of Resolution 2021-09 approved the acquisition and sale of the Property to potentially provide affordable housing; and WHEREAS, on April 19, 2021 the HRA acquired the Property; and WHEREAS, the Edina Planning Commission reviewed the WHAHLT proposal on January 26, 2022 and recommended that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (“HRA”) approve the conveyance of the Property to WHAHLT; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 462.356 Subd. 2 requires that the Planning Commission review the proposed sale of the property by the City and the HRA to determine compliance with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed this proposed sale to determine its compliance with the comprehensive plan for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission that after reviewing the proposed sale of the Property, the Planning Commission finds that the sale is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.. Dated: ________________, 2022 ___________________________ Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Planning Commission Secretary January 5th, 2022 Stephanie Hawkinson Affordable Housing Development Manager 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Stephanie; This letter is to inform you that West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, dba Homes Within Reach (HWR), would like to purchase 425 Jefferson Ave. S from Edina HRA, if a satisfactory agreement can be reached. We are prepared to pay $1 for clear title to the property. West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust dba Homes Within Reach (HWR) program’s purpose is create and preserve affordable homeownership in the western suburbs of Hennepin County, using the land trust practice. Our practice is to acquire properties, upgrade per our criteria, then turn around, and sell the homes to qualified households earning between 50% to 80% area median income and lease the land to the homeowner for them to secure the rights to use the land. We see the purchase of 425 Jefferson Ave. S as another positive partnering experience between Edina and HWR. Our intent is to completely rehab the current structure. However, without the ability to start tearing into the walls, we are unable to fully commit to the rehab of the current structure. Should rehab not be feasible, HWR would demolish the structure and rebuild to current setbacks and building codes. Regardless of the option used, we intend to make the home a 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2 car detached garage which would be placed in our portfolio. The home would be sold to a qualified buyer and the land would remain in title to Homes Within Reach and leased to the qualified buyer. The attached ground lease would require the home to remain affordable in perpetuity. Our goal is to complete the acquisition process in early spring of 2022. We would anticipate completing rehab or new construction by year end, given no unforeseen complications. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact us at (952) 401-7071. Sincerely, Brenda Lano-Wolke Brenda Lano-Wolke Executive Director WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TRUST 5101 Thimsen Ave., Ste. 202, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Telephone (952) 401-7071 Fax: (952) 224-2857 Email: info@homeswithinreach.org Date: January 26, 2022 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:S ketch P lan R eview - 5146 Eden Avenue (F ormer P ublic Works S ite) Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. P rovide the applicants non-binding feedback on a potential future development proposal. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he P lanning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant site at 5146 E den Avenue. T his is the old P ublic Works site. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include: * A 6-1/2-story, 90-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with 173 underground parking spaces. (Applewood P ointe C ooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units). * A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 32 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west. * A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to a bridge that would connect the J erry’s parking ramp. T his connection was recommended in the Grandview D evelopment Framework. (See attached pages from the development framework.) AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Memo Memo - Affordable Hous ing Development Manager Proposed Plans Applicant Narrative Key Pages Grandview Development Framework Grandview Trans portation Study Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan Site Plan with Setbacks Highlighted City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: January 26, 2022 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 5146 Eden Avenue (Former Public Works Site) The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop the 3.3-acre vacant site at 5146 Eden Avenue. This is the old Public Works site. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include:  A 6-1/2-story, 90-unit senior cooperative project (owner occupied) with 173 underground parking spaces. (Applewood Pointe Cooperative) Ten percent (10%) of the units would be for affordable housing (9 units).  A two-story, 13,500 square foot 347 seat restaurant with 32 surface parking stalls. Additional parking would rely on the public Jerry’s parking ramp to the west.  A 31,643 square foot green space/public plaza area with pedestrian walkways to a bridge that would connect the Jerry’s parking ramp. This connection was recommended in the Grandview Development Framework. (See attached pages from the development framework.) To accommodate the request the following is required:  A Rezoning from PID, Planned Industrial District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Flexibility would be requested through the PUD Ordinance to vary from setback, building height, parking, and floor area ratio (FAR) requirements. The PUD Zoning is also used to ensure the affordable housing on the site. As with all sketch plan reviews; the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus for the discussion should be on the proposed land uses, proposed height, proposed setbacks, and the Grandview Development Framework and Guiding Principles. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The applicant has specifically responded to the Grandview District’s 7 Guiding Principles within their narrative. (See attached plans and narrative.) Below is a list of the 7 Guiding Principles with the applicant response: Grandview District – 7 Guiding Principles Applicant Response 1. Leverage publicly owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public, and private development. The 5146 Parcel is the “strategic interior link” between the Hwy 100 Frontage area and Vernon Avenue West Gateway area. The proposal activates this link with the pedestrian connections, Grandview Yard and maintains access for multi- modal transit. 2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both business and residents will make the District a good place to do business. Economic viability includes tax base, residential living, expanded service offerings and job creation. The proposal hits on all points with tax capacity generation with private commercial use, new home ownership opportunities for Edina residents, and economic development to enhance neighborhood vitality. The Grandview Yard is anticipated to serve as an attractive amenity as other area parcels redevelop in the future. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The railroad tracks – once a barrier, is now spanned to connect p arcels and better utilize existing parking resources. 4. Design for the present and for the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping-stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. The site design captures all these themes – vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life filled. The placement of Grandview Yard is anticipated to shape the land use patterns of adjacent parcels when they redevelop in the future. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. The plan provides adequate adjacent surface and enclosed parking for the uses while activating the Grandview ramp (270+ spaces) into a renewed resource for parking supply in the district with the addition of the pedestrian bridge and trail. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The development is multi-modal, pedestrian-centric and transit ready. The site plan covers the objective and opportunities for district wide access to and through the site. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The combination of the Grandview Yard, a year-round hospitality, dining and event destination and ownership residential living packaged within an integrated design plan creates a sustainable and unique place unlike any offering in the Edina community. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Issues/considerations:  Density. The residential density proposed is on the low end of the density range within the Comprehensive Plan and therefore reasonable for the site. The density is 28 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan would allow up to 100 units at this site.  Grandview Development Framework. The proposed plans contain two key elements in the Framework: A bridge that would connect the Jerry’s parking ramp and a large public green space. (Bridge to be installed by the City of Edina.) Plans show the bridge and a 31,643 square foot public plaza. (See attached Development Framework Document.) The applicant has done a nice job addressing the 7 Guiding Principles for the Grandview District as highlighted above.  Grandview Transportation Plan. Sidewalks are proposed along the south and east lot line per the Plan. Also, there is a round-a-bout planned for the intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue. The applicant has designed their plans to accommodate the new configuration of this intersection.  Building Setbacks. Flexibility would be needed through a PUD from the required setbacks. (See the proposed setbacks on the attached site plan.) The setbacks proposed along Eden Avenue are generally consistent with the setbacks of the existing Avidor residential building to the west. (See the attached concept plans showing the adjacent Avidor project.) The proposed building is angled toward Eden Avenue to allow more landscaping and green space in front. The setbacks on Arcadia are tighter due to the land being taken from the site to accommodate the new round-a-bout at Arcadia and Eden. (The new round-a-bout configuration is shown on the site plan attached.)  Traffic and parking. A traffic and parking study would be required. Parking for the restaurant would rely on the 32 surface stalls and the Jerry’s parking ramp. The parking study would determine if there would be an adequate amount of parking spaces available for the restaurant and the uses at and around Jerry’s.  Affordable Housing. The applicant proposes to provide 10% of the units to meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy.  Proposed heights. The proposed height of 6-7 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. The Grandview Development Framework Study contemplated no buildings exceeding the height of the Jerry’s tower. The height would not exceed the height of the Jerry’s office tower. The added height seems appropriate to obtain affordable housing units, the public plaza and construction of the public bridge across the railroad tracks to connect to the Jerry’s parking ramp.  Sustainability. The applicant will be required to fill out the City’s Sustainability Questionnaire to address sustainability issues. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424  The proposed plans would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning. Note that flexibility would be requested from the underlying zoning standards through the PUD: COMPLIANCE TABLE City Standard (PID) Comp. Plan Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – West Rear – North Building Setbacks to the lot line - Restaurant Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – West Rear – North based on height (60-70 feet) based on height based on height based on height based on height (20-30 feet) based on height based on height based on height Variance Required (7-50 feet) Variance Required (5 feet) Variance Required (5-10 feet) Code Compliant Code Compliant Code Compliant Variance Required (10 feet) Code Compliant Density 20-100 units/acre Compliant (28 units per acre) Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Variance Required for the apartment (6-7 stories) Restaurant is Code Compliant Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 45% .50% (Adjacent zoning PCD-2 Zoning allows 1.5 FAR) – Comp Plan Guides the site for PCD-2 Uses Code Compliant Variance Required 1.4% Parking Stalls – Residential (Senior Housing) Parking Stalls – Restaurant .75 units per unit = 68 spaces One space per 3 seats + one space per employee on a max. shift (125-130 spaces) 173 spaces Variance required (32 spaces on site plus the Jerry’s parking ramp) TO: Cary Teague, Community Development Director FROM: Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager DATE: January 10, 2022 RE: 5146 Eden Site Plan Submittal The proposed 5146 Eden plan entails redeveloping a City owned parcel that has been vacant for many years. On the south end is a proposed 90-unit senior cooperative, of which 10% or 9 units will available at affordable prices per the Affordable Housing Policy. This is the first multifamily ownership development containing affordable housing units that has been reviewed in recent years. It complies with strategies outlined by the Housing Strategy Task Force and the Comprehensive Plan. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan  Goal 1.1: Seek to accommodate the total new households projected to locate in the city by the year 2040.  Goal 1.1e: Providing lifecycle housing opportunities to allow residents to remain in the city throughout all life stages  Goal 1.1.f: Addressing climate change through higher density development patterns that help reduce vehicle emissions  Goal 2.9: Promote owner-occupied units over rental units when providing affordable housing.  Goal 3.2: Where appropriate and guided by city policy, encourage the development of walkable neighborhoods that provide a range of daily needs within walking distance, potentially reducing reliance on cars.  Goal 4.1: Promote increased housing opportunities and a diversity of housing types by promoting the creative and innovative use of land guided for residential/commercial mixed-use while promoting transit use and other mobility alternatives.  Goal 4.2: Promote a vision of community that is inclusive of a range of ages, incomes, abilities, and other demographics, and offers a range of housing options. Compliance with Housing Strategy Task Force Report  Goal 1: Promote lifecycle housing. Actively work to create lifecycle housing to support a range of housing options that meet people’s preferences and circumstances in all stages of life, such as renters, first-time homebuyers, empty nesters, and seniors. I understand there may be concerns regarding the perceived concentration of age restricted housing in this area. I am not concerned by this. Rather with the library, senior center and other amenities I think it is appropriate. Furthermore, there is a great need for more housing options for seniors. GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN RESTAURANT GRANDVIEW YARD PARKING RAMP SENIOR CO-OP JERRY’S FOODS AVIDOR LIVING EXISTING COMMERCIAL EXISTING COMMERCIAL EDEN 100 OFFICE BUILDING HILLTOP RESTAURANT GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARD TERRACE SEATING PED ROUTE EVENTS LAWN OUTDOOR DINING AMENITY DECK AMENITY COURTYARD EX SECTION ARCADIA AVE SECTION CO-OP ENTRY PLAZA RESTAURANT SENIOR CO-OP PARKING PARKING EXISTING RAILROAD SERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET PUBLIC RESTROOM PED BRIDGE SHORT TERM PARKING PARKING ACCESS PARKING ACCESS GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN SENIOR CO-OP PROPERTY RESTAURANT PROPERTY GRANDVIEW YARD PARK GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN PED BRIDGE TERRACING PARKING GRANDVIEW YARD DRIVE AISLE CO-OP ENTRY PLAZA PUBLIC RESTROOM RESTAURANT SENIOR CO-OP AVIDOR LIVING (BEHIND)JERRY’S 5101 OFFICE TOWER GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARDRESTAURANT SENIOR CO-OP SHORT TERM PARKING AMENITY DECK PARKING ACCESS EXISTING RAILROAD PED BRIDGE GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARD TERRACE SEATING SLOPED LAWN PED ROUTE EVENT LAWN OUTDOOR DINING RESTAURANT PARKING EXISTING RAILROAD SERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PUBLIC RESTROOM PED BRIDGE GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARD PED ROUTE EVENT LAWN OUTDOOR DINING PARKING ACCESS CO-OP ENTRY PLAZA RESTAURANT PARKING EXISTING RAILROAD PUBLIC RESTROOM PED BRIDGE SENIOR CO-OP GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARD TERRACE SEATING SLOPED LAWN PED ROUTE EVENT LAWN OUTDOOR DINING RESTAURANT PARKING SERVICE AREA RESTAURANT VALET LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER PED BRIDGE GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN GRANDVIEW YARD PED ROUTEEVENT LAWN PED CONNECTION LANDSCAPE BUFFER OUTDOOR DINING RESTAURANT EXISTING RAILROAD PUBLIC RESTROOM PED BRIDGE SENIOR CO-OP GRANDVIEW YARD - CONCEPT JANUARY 2022EDINA, MN 1 PROJECT NARRATIVE Sketch Plan Submittal January 7, 2022 Grandview Yard Mixed-Use Development Concept 5146 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota Project Team: Property Owner / Project Sponsor Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Contact: Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Broker / Pre-Development Manager Frauenshuh, Inc. 7101 78th Street West, Suite 100 Edina, MN 55439 Contact: David Anderson, Senior Vice President Developer (Senior Cooperatives) United Properties 651 Nicollet Mall, Suite 450 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Contact: Alex Hall, Senior Vice President Developer (Restaurant) Jester Concepts 730 N Washington Ave Minneapolis, MN 55401 Contact: Brent Frederick, Owner 2 Design Team Members: Site Plan/Architecture (Senior Cooperatives) Site Plan/Architecture (Restaurant) Pope Associates Shea 1295 Bandana Blvd. N, Suite 200 10 South Eighth Street St. Paul, MN 55108 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Contact: Paul Holmes, Principal Contact: Jordan Brookens, Project Coordinator Civil Engineering Landscape Architecture Loucks Associates Confluence 7200 Hemlock Ln N, Suite 300 530 N 3rd St #120 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Contact: Vicki VanDell, Civil Engineer Contact: Terry Minarik, Principal The enclosed package provides information describing and illustrating an exciting redevelopment vision for the property at 5146 Eden Avenue, commonly known as the “former public works site” in the city of Edina. This submittal reflects the collaboration among the Edina HRA and City of Edina staff, Frauenshuh, Inc., United Properties, Jester Concepts and the key design partners. At the foundation of this plan and vision are the Grandview District 7 Guiding Principles, which set an important framework for the City’s vision and opportunity to achieve even greater potential for the Grandview District, through sound planning, land uses, design and civic infrastructure. The team is excited to present and discuss the overall vision with the Planning Commission and City Council at this sketch plan/planning/pre-design phase. 1. SITE OVERVIEW Parcel Basics The parcel is approximately 3.125 acres in size and is positioned at the northwest quadrant of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue in the Grandview district of Edina. The site was formerly occupied by the City of Edina public works department, which relocated its operation to 7450 Metro Blvd. in 2010. Subsequent to this move, the public works building was demolished, and the parcel has remained vacant in the interim. Project Land Use Data The site is currently zoned Planned Industrial District (PID) and the Edina HRA or affiliate would seek rezoning as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate the specific use components and attributes that the project will bring to the site and Grandview district. The proposed development will include a replat of the parcels, creating a new parcel on the south portion of the site (the “Senior Cooperative Parcel”) the central portion (the “Restaurant Parcel”) and the north portion (the “Grandview Yard Parcel”) as illustrated in the attached site plan. Integrated with the Grandview Yard Parcel is the pedestrian route and bridge that is presently 3 under construction, connecting Arcadia Avenue to the Grandview (Jerry’s) Parking ramp, elevated over the railroad tracks. The pedestrian route and bridge is currently under construction and slated for completion in 2022. In addition to the physical plan and use components of the site, the site plan incorporates the design standards for the future installation of a roundabout at Eden Ave. and Arcadia Ave., widening of Arcadia Ave. and pedestrian improvements to the rail bridge foundation at Eden Ave. These improvements, along with the elements of this development plan lend to a strong integration of the new infrastructure and development uses into the Grandview District. 2. DEVELOPMENT DATA Grandview Yard The Grandview Yard is an exciting element of the overall vision of the site and opportunity to bring a dynamic new and functional activation and public green space to the Grandview District. The space will provide space for passive use by the general public and also be available for public gatherings and special events throughout the year. A key component of the vision is to create synergistic programming opportunities between the restaurant and Grandview Yard to create a unique and one-of-a-kind draw and destination in the Grandview District, throughout the year. Restaurant/Dining/Hospitality Overview: The restaurant component will reside in the central portion of the site. The building will be three levels in design with a lower (basement) level and first and second levels above grade. The approximately footprint size of the building is 4,500 sq. ft., with a total building size of approximately 13,500 sq. ft. The site plan includes 32 spaces of surface parking with convenient access to the restaurant entry. In addition to surface parking on site, the restaurant would be served by the Grandview public parking ramp and pedestrian bridge, along with valet service provided by the operator. We intend to bring our blend of focused hospitality and unique dining experiences to the City of Edina. As a group, we believe that an elevated Pizza concept would be warmly welcomed by the City and its residents. We would highlight an open hearth for cooking pizza as well as small plates, entrées and seasonal vegetables. We would implement a craft cocktail program that has become a staple within all of our locations. An amazing wine list is essential, and we would take an esoteric approach while incorporating the recognizable labels for familiarity. We would pair this concept with a secret/underground bar perfect for a late night old fashioned, a negroni or a slice of pizza. The top floor would boast a private event space for family gatherings and small businesses while being utilized for overflow dining when events are not booked. An expansive outdoor patio would sit adjacent to the restaurant in which we hope to extend the season and welcome guests during the spring and fall. The patio would open up to the outdoor lawn which gives us an opportunity to welcome all residents in a community gathering space. We would activate the lawn all year round in conjunction with the City. 4 Senior Cooperative Overview: The senior cooperative component will reside on the south portion of the site. The building will be five stories on one side and six-stories in height on the other, with one level of underground parking (125 spaces) at the lower level of the building, and resident/ guest parking on the second level (48 spaces), for a total of approximately 173 parking spaces. Units will range in size from 1,1290 sq. ft to 1,1650sq. ft. and contain a mix of two (2) and three (3) bedroom units. Initial programming targets a total unit count of approximately 90 homes. Applewood Pointe Cooperatives provide a “for sale” housing option with high quality finishes in a low maintenance community-based setting. Members elect a resident board of directors responsible for managing the community. Financing is provided through a 40-year HUD insured master mortgage. Members choose from 4 equity tiers with the balance financed thru this mortgage eliminating the need to secure individual financing. This housing cooperative will include a 10% affordable housing component per City policy. Site and Building Program Summary Component (North to South) Site Area Building Area (Total GSF) FAR Residential Units On-Site Parking Count Grandview Yard 31,643 SF NA NA NA 0 Restaurant 31,149 SF 13,500 SF .43 NA 32, plus valet Senior Cooperative 73,832 SF 171,650 SF 2.32 90 173 Totals* 136,624 SF 185,150 SF 1.36 205 *Not including land dedicated to public right-of-way 3. GRANDVIEW DISTRICT 7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1. Leverage publicly owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. The 5146 Parcel is the “strategic interior link” between the Hwy 100 Frontage area and Vernon Avenue West Gateway area. The proposal activates this link with the pedestrian connections, Grandview Yard and maintains access for multi-modal transit. 2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both business and residents will make the District a good place to do business. Economic viability includes tax base, residential living, expanded service offerings and job creation. The proposal hits on all points with tax capacity generation with private commercial use, new home ownership opportunities for Edina residents, and economic development to enhance neighborhood vitality. The Grandview Yard is anticipated to serve as an attractive amenity as other area parcels redevelop in the future. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The railroad tracks – once a barrier, is now spanned to connect parcels and better utilize existing parking resources.. 4. Design for the present and for the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping-stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life- filled place. The site design captures all these themes – vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life filled. The placement of Grandview Yard is anticipated to shape the 5 land use patterns of adjacent parcels when they redevelop in the future. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. The plan provides adequate adjacent surface and enclosed parking for the uses while activating the Grandview ramp (270+ spaces) into a renewed resource for parking supply in the district with the addition of the pedestrian bridge and trail. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The development is multi-modal, pedestrian-centric and transit ready. The site plan covers the objective and opportunities for district wide access to and through the site. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The combination of the Grandview Yard, a year-round hospitality, dining and event destination and ownership residential living packaged within an integrated design plan creates a sustainable and unique place unlike any offering in the Edina community. 4. SUMMARY The team is eager to advance this development plan and bring this exciting project to fruition through a continued collaborative effort. We believe the elements incorporated into this vision provide the opportunity to create a truly unique hospitality and destination redevelopment that further enhances and activates the Grandview District. The project team and designers are excited to hear your reaction and suggestion to this new concept. Input received will be taken into sincere consideration as the Edina HRA, United Properties and Jester Concepts refine the redevelopment strategy for this vacant site. 1.Hope for Change Introduction Hope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration,participation, and planning.Thousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small)have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders,business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed officials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. The result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy,policy,and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable,memorable ways. Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process,December 2010 64/05/12 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan ArcadiaAveHwy100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 154/05/12 Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use ArcadiaAveHwy100Illustrative M aster Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 164/05/12 Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 274/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center ArcadiaAve324/05/12 Gus Young Ln Jerry’s Public Realm Vernon,Gus Young,Interlachen The plan recommends a number of street and traffic improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffic, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians.This is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing)and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor)that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern.Anchoring the public realm is the G r andView G reen,an approximately one-half +acre public space located on the north end of the public works site. 1.New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing). 2.GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area. 3.Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair. 4.Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed. 5.Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon. 6.Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements. 7.Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/ pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100. 8.Public steps of Arcadia. 1 GrandView Crossing 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 8SummitCommunity/ Civic Building City Parking Ramp 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Complete/Living Streets improvements Private streetscapes Split diamond interchange New /improved bridges 354/05/12 Transportation ArcadiaAveHwy100District Street Framework The movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” configuration. This approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. The existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffic would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term,there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffic access and circulation in the upper core of the District. Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West 374/05/12 Site EdinaMN.gov 2 Site EdinaMN.gov 3 Site Zoning -PID EdinaMN.gov 4 Site - D.. uJ !:: PARKING RAMP -I 1 i l...c...,,-,,_,.,____�-.L-,""' -7 I_J LOT 3 73,832 SF ( \ .. ,,/ READING CENTER OF E ·, .,... \ . .,.,.,,...,_.,..-<"_ I ' . c'''� -:· ·-;;>/ . :,"' . \_�'f\�/:�