Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-03-24 Meeting PacketAgenda Transportation Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota Public Works Facility - Multi-Purpose Room Thursday, March 24, 2022 6:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 17, 2022 V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.2021 Tra&c Safety Summary Report B.2021 PACS Fund Summary Report VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.Tra&c Safety Report of March 1, 2022 B.2022 Work Plan Updates VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Sta/ Comments X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli3cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 17, 2022 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of the Transportation Commission regular meeting of February 17, 2022. INTRODUCTION: See attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes: Feb. 17, 2022 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Webex February 17, 2022 I. Call To Order Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Ahler, Brown, Kitui, Lewis, Plumb-Smith, Richman, Clark, Johnson Late: Commissioner Kanti Mahanty Absent: Commissioners Kane, McCarthy Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner Plumb-Smith to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Plumb-Smith and seconded by Commissioner Brown to approve the January 20, 2022 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognition and Presentations A. Micromobility Education, Part 1 Liaison Scipioni provided a brief presentation of the City’s experience with micromobility services between 2018 and 2020. Commissioner Kanti Mahanty arrived at 6:29. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Traffic Safety Report of January 25, 2022 The Commission reviewed and commented on the Traffic Safety Report of January 25, 2022. B. 2022 Work Plan Updates  #1 Tree Boulevard Policy – Met with City Forester, planning to talk to other Commissions about their thoughts.  #2 Public Transit Checklist – Met with Metro Transit staff; service levels are expected to decrease due to driver shortage and ridership decline. Next step is to take information and start formalizing checklist.  #3 PACS Fund Policy – Scheduling meeting with staff to discuss next steps.  #4 SRTS Demonstration Projects – No update.  #5 TIS Process Review – No update. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date:  #6 Transit Connectivity – This initiative will follow the lead of Initiative #2. C. Annual Elections Commissioner Plumb-Smith nominated Commissioner Lewis as Vice Chair. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Richman. All voted aye. Motion carried. Commissioner Richman nominated Commissioner Johnson as Chair. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Plumb-Smith. All voted aye. Motion carried. VII. Chair and Member Comments – Received. VIII. Staff Comments – Received. IX. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner Plumb-Smith to adjourn the February 17, 2022 meeting at 7:31 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 2 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 2 100% Brown, Chris 1 1 2 100% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 0 0% Kitui, Janet 1 1 50% Lewis, Andy 1 1 2 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 50% Plumb-Smith, Jill 1 1 2 100% Richman, Lori 1 1 2 100% Clark, Anna (s) 1 1 50% Kanti Mahanty, Stephen (s) 1 1 50% Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report Discussion, Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and comment on the 2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. Commission comments will be included in the staff report presented to City Council at their April 5 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report March 24, 2022 Transportation Commission Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator 2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report Information / Background: The Engineering Department received 180 traffic safety requests in 2021. Requests are received by phone, mail, email and through the City’s website. 165 requests were reviewed and completed in 2021, an increase of seven requests from 2020; this includes 15 requests received before 2021. Each request may require data collection and analysis by the Traffic Safety Coordinator prior to review by the Traffic Safety Committee. Requests are assigned to one of five categories; Traffic Calming, Parking and Signage, Intersection Control, Pedestrian Safety or Other (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Traffic Safety Requests Reviewed in 2021 After requests are reviewed by the Committee, they are categorized as A (recommended approval), B (recommended denial/no change) or C (recommend further study) items in traffic safety reports. Many requests are handled solely by the Traffic Safety Coordinator; these are generally requests for increased police enforcement or for matters governed by existing City policies (crosswalks, signage, traffic signals, etc.). These are categorized as D items. Table 1 shows the full breakdown of requests reviewed in 2021. 19% 25% 23% 20% 13% Traffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other STAFF REPORT Page 2 Table 1. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Type In total, the Committee recommended approval of 18 requests (A items) and denial of 14 (B items). 133 requests were handled by the Traffic Safety Coordinator (D items). Parking and Signage along with Pedestrian Safety received the highest number of approvals (7), followed by Traffic Calming and Intersection Control (2). Figure 2 shows the 2021 traffic safety requests by month received. There was a significant increase in requests in April, likely a result of improving weather and traffic volumes returning to pre-pandemic levels. Figure 2. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Month Received Request Type Traffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other Items Reviewed 32 (19%) 41 (25%) 38 (23%) 33 (20%) 21 (13%) Recommendation A B D A B D A B D A B D A B D 2 2 28 7 9 25 2 2 34 7 1 25 0 0 21 % 6% 6% 88% 17% 22% 61% 5% 5% 89% 21% 3% 76% 0% 0% 100% 0 5 10 15 20 25 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec# of RequestsTraffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other STAFF REPORT Page 3 Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate trends from 2018 to 2021. Figure 3 shows the number of requests received by month, which illustrates most requests are received in the spring and summer months and taper off in the fall and winter. Figure 3. Traffic Safety Requests Received by Month (2018 – 2021) Figure 4 shows requests submitted by category. Intersection Control and Traffic Calming requests have increased in recent years. In 2021, Parking & Signage and Pedestrian Safety have remained at consistent levels. Figure 4. Traffic Safety Requests Received by Category (2018 – 2021) Each request is geolocated so staff can monitor trends and track multiple requests made at the same locations. Table 2 shows the number of requests received from each quadrant of the City and the most requested category. Figures 5 – 8 show the locations of each traffic safety request by quadrant. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 2018 2019 2020 2021 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Traffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other 2018 2019 2020 2021 STAFF REPORT Page 4 Table 2. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Quadrant Quadrant Requests Received % of Total Requests Received Most Requested Category Northwest 49 27% Pedestrian Safety (13) Southwest 32 18% Parking and Signage and Pedestrian Safety (9) Northeast 73 41% Parking & Signage (29) Southeast 26 14% Intersection Control (11) Figure 5. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Northwest Edina STAFF REPORT Page 5 Figure 6. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Southwest Edina STAFF REPORT Page 6 Figure 7. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Southeast Edina STAFF REPORT Page 7 Figure 8. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Northeast Edina Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2021 PACS Fund Summary Report Discussion, Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and comment on the 2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report and supporting material. Commission comments will be included in the report presented to City Council at their April 5 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2021 PACS Fund Report 2021 PACS Fund Projects Map 2021 PACS Fund Summary Table                 March 24, 2022 Transportation Commission Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner 2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report Information / Background: The PACS Funds available in 2021 were $1,361,499. This includes $132,113 in rollover funds from 2020. Approximately $523,549 is estimated to roll over into the current PACS Fund (2022). $837,950 (62%) of available funds were spent on PACS-related projects and items in 2021 (a decrease of approximately $843,675 or 50% from 2020). About 1.6 miles of new pedestrian and bicycle facilities were installed in 2021 using the PACS Fund (1.5 less than 2020). Table 1 shows a breakdown of all related expenditures in 2021. Details project costs and locations are shown in the attached summary table and project map. Table 1: 2021 PACS Fund Expenditures While most of the costs shown are actual construction costs, some are estimated based on pending final payments to contractors. Additionally, as of the time of this memorandum, the fourth quarter 2021 utility franchise fees have yet to be received and are estimated for this report. Attached: 2021 PACS Fund Summary Table 2021 PACS Fund Projects Map PACS Project Type Cost Total Percentage  New Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities $ 587,757  70.1%  Maintain Existing Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities $ 15,254  1.8%  Citywide Speed Limit Reduction $ 13,169  1.6%  Final Payments for Previous Projects $ 53,819  6.5%  Total Construction: $ 669,999 80.0%  Professional Services $ 51,917  6.2%  Other (maintenance, supplies, etc.) $ 7,860  0.9%  Transportation Planner Salary and Benefits $ 108,174  12.9%   Total Administrative: $ 167,951 20.0%  Total 2021 PACS Expenditures:  $ 837,950 100.0%  ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñ ñTRACY AVEVERNO N AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT A D RGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter AvailAcademy GoldenYears Montessori City Hall St Peter's Lutheran Church & School South ViewMiddle School NormandaleElementary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool Southdale Library FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance Creek ValleySchool FireStation Valley ViewMiddle School EdinaHighSchool CountrysideSchool HighlandsSchool EdinaCommunityLibrary Our Lady ofGrace Church & School M in nehahaCreek NineMileCreek Nin eMileCreek SouthdaleCenter Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV ERN O N A VECAHILL RD66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4TH S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD 78TH ST W I-494 HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62 HWY 62 March 2022 City of Edina 2021 PACS Fund Projects ± 0 2,000 Feet A BC D E *Franchise Fees = 1,229,386.34$     Intergovernmental (Grants) =‐$                      Other =‐$                      2020 PACS Fund Rollover = 132,113.54$        1,361,499.88$    Construction Street/Item LocationMap KeyApprox. LF of New FacilityNotes Cost% of ExpendituresPedestrian Hansen Rd, W 56th St sidewalks Vernon Ave to W 60th St, Hansen Rd to Normandale Rd A 5,065 Melody Lake A/B, Birchcrest C Roadway Reconstruction 401,322.76$        Pedestrian Beard Ave, Fuller St sidewalks W 54th St to Minnehaha Creek, France Ave to Drew Ave B 1,233 Creek Knoll A/B Roadway Reconstruction70,537.59$          Pedestrian/ BicycleHighlands Park shared‐use paths Ayrshire Blvd, Doncaster Way C 1,530 115,896.21$        Pedestrian/ BicycleGleason Rd shared‐use path Vernon Ave to Nine Mile Creek culvert D 560 Bituminous overlay 6,145.52$             Pedestrian SafetyLincoln Dr RRFB replacement 400' south of Londonderry Rd E‐Replacement flashers, signs, hardware 9,108.51$             Newman Signs, Inc.‐‐Sign panels, sign posts 12,326.10$          Shapco Printing, Inc.‐‐Drive 25 car coasters 706.38$                BJKK Development‐‐Drive 25 info cards 137.00$                Pedestrian/ BicycleFinal payments on 2020 projects‐‐53,819.04$          ProfessionalServicesMcCauley Trl shared‐use path Valley View Rd to Gleason Rd‐‐Engineering fees (WSB) 51,917.00$          6.2%OtherInternal services (I.T., equipment maintenance)7,860.00$             0.9%TransportationPlannerOne full‐time employee (direct and indirect labor costs)108,174.54$        12.9%Total = 837,950.65$        100.0%8,388 **Rollover to 2022 Budget = 523,549.23$        80.0%**Based on estimated 4th quarter 2021 fees and estimated final construction costs* Includes estimated 4th quarter 2021 feesRevenue2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Expenditures2021 PACS Budget =Pedestrian SafetyCitywide Speed Limit Reduction Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022 Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and comment on the Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. Comments received by the Commission will be included in the staff report provided to City Council at their April 5 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022 March 24, 2022 Transportation Commission Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 1. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Transportation Planner, Streets Public Service Worker, City Engineer, Public Works Director, Police Sergeant and Assistant City Planner was in attendance for this meeting. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the April 5 regular meeting. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Review sight line concerns for southbound traffic on Eastview Dr facing west on Benton Ave  A fence was installed at 5828 Eastview Dr in summer 2021.  Sight distance from Eastview Dr is approximately 170’; 155’ needed for 25 mph roadway.  2019 Benton Ave ADT is 3,500.  Benton Ave is uncontrolled at Eastview Dr, all-way stop control at Tingdale Ave.  No reported crashes at intersection in past 10 years.  Eastview Dr was reconstructed in 2021.  Reported concerns include snow storage at northwest corner of intersection. Staff recommends no action; sight distance allows adequate stopping distance for both directions of traffic on Benton Ave. Southbound Tingdale Ave facing eastbound Benton Ave STAFF REPORT Page 2 B2. Review turn count data at France Ave & 49th St, Maple Rd & 50th St  Separate complaints of increased traffic and speeds on 48th and 49th Streets.  48th St data from 2017 to 2021; i. ADT decreased (532 to 404). ii. 85%-speed was consistent (30.6 to 30.7 mph).  49th St data from 2014, 2018 (during Nolan Mains construction) and 2021; i. ADT: 424, 923 and 842, respectively ii. 85%-speed: 31.1, 29.5 and 30.2 mph, respectively.  One crash was reported on Maple Rd in 2017.  In 2021, 19% of traffic were large vehicles, up from 17.9% in 2014.  Staff reviewed intersection turn counts to analyze vehicle types; i. France Ave & 49th St: 580 passenger vehicles, 26 2-axel vans/trucks and 8 semis/buses. ii. Maple Rd & 50th St: 1164 passenger vehicles, 44 2-axel vans/trucks and 18 semis/buses Staff recommends no action given; observed speeds and volumes are within acceptable ranges for Local Connector and Local streets. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. Two residents had concerns with signal timing delays for traffic on W 58th St and Parklawn Ave at France Ave, leading to drivers running red lights. Hennepin County reviewed these signals and updated the cycles to function appropriately. D2. A 10-mph speed limit was requested on Skyline Dr due to the high number of children in the neighborhood. Given the context of this street, no changes are recommended from the current 25-mph speed limit. D3. A resident reported a missing speed limit sign entering the south side of the alley between Madison Ave and Jefferson Ave. Upon a site visit, a sign was in place and no further action needed. D4. A request was made for additional road salt to treat excess ice on Doncaster Way. Public Works was reviewed and responded to the request. D5. A crosswalk was requested over Gleason Rd at Gleason Ct. A video study observed 32 total crosses with a peak of 8 at 11:30 am. No crosswalk warrants were met. D6. A crosswalk was requested to connect the sidewalk on the west side of France Ave at W 62nd St. A video study observed 71 crosses with a peak hour of 11. Due to W 62nd being stop controlled, crossing warrants were not met. Staff will work with Metro Transit to determine appropriate crossing treatments at this intersection as part of the future E line BRT project. Maple Rd & 50th St (left) and France Ave & 49th St (right) STAFF REPORT Page 3 D7. A requester had questions about signal timing on France Ave at Highway 62. MnDOT contacted the requestor and provided answers regarding signal timing priorities for optimal traffic flow. D8. A resident had concerns about cut-thru traffic and safety for pedestrians on W 60th St between Normandale Rd and Wooddale Ave. ADT and 85%-speed in 2021 was observed at 918 and 29.7 mph, respectively, which are within the acceptable range for a Local Connector street. No action is recommended; the resident was informed of a proposed sidewalk between Concord Ave and Pamela Park. D9. A resident was concerned with drivers on France Ave between Highway 62 and W 54th St not stopping for buses with stop arms engaged. EPD was contacted for enforcement along with Hennepin County to review if physical improvements should be implemented. D10. A resident had concerns of vehicle speeds on Hansen Rd following the 2021 street reconstruction project. Vehicles monitored with a speed detector ranged from 25 to 30 mph. No action is warranted. D11. A group home manager at 5313 W 56th St requested allowance for long-term street parking for their staff. City Code doesn’t allow on-street parking longer than six hours. The manager was given options including constructing a larger driveway or contacting City Council about changing on-street parking time limit. D12. A request was made to extend pavement markings for left turning vehicles on W 70th St turning north into Highway 100/Normandale Rd. Dotted lines (or cat tracks) extend through the intersection to restrict left-turning vehicles from merging within the intersection. No pavement markings exist between the crosswalk and the ramp to allow vehicles to merge into their desired lanes. No changes are recommended. Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2022 Work Plan Updates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Commissioners will provide updates on the status of 2022 Work P lan initiatives (unless an item is elsewhere on the current agenda). See attached work plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2022 Work Plan Progress Report Approved by City Council December 7, 2021 Commission: Transportation Commission 2022 Annual Work Plan Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Boulevard Tree Policy Research, develop and recommend a citywide boulevard tree policy that addresses planting, protection, maintenance, removal and funding. Deliverable Policy for consideration by City Council Lead Lori Richman Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison, periodic support from City Forester and/or Community Development Director. Jan: Looking for committee members to assist in developing the policy, reviewing other agencies’ policies. Feb: Met with City Forester, planning to talk to other Commissions about their thoughts. Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Public Transit Checklist Develop a transit checklist to review on the proposed development projects. Planning Commission will review and comment Deliverables Report to City Council Lead Andy Lewis Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-3 hours per month from Staff Liaison; periodic support from Community Development Director. Jan: Reached out to members of the Planning Commission and Met Council for updates on transit operations in the city in 2022. Feb: Met with Metro Transit staff; service levels are expected to decrease due to driver shortage and ridership decline. Next step is to take information and start formalizing checklist. Approved by City Council December 7, 2021 Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) PACS Fund Policy Review and recommend changes to the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund policy. Deliverable Report to City Council Lead Chris Brown Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-3 hours per month by Staff Liaison; periodic support from Finance and/or Administration Jan: Would like to meet with staff to understand expenditures and buying power of the fund. Admin and Engineering are preparing a report on fund to bring to Commission for review and comment. Feb: Scheduling meeting with staff to discuss next steps. Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) SRTS Demonstration Projects Study Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and report on potential Safe Routes to School demonstration projects. Deliverable Report to staff Lead Bocar Kane Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison. Jan: No update. Feb: No update. Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) TIS Process Review Study and report on other agencies' process for completed traffic impact studies related to development/redevelopment projects. Deliverable Report to City Council Lead Bocar Kane Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month by Staff Liaison; periodic support from Director of Engineering and Community Development Director. Jan: No update. Feb: No update. Approved by City Council December 7, 2021 Initiative #6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Transit Connectivity Review the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and recommend changes to proposed facilities to improve connectivity to public transit. Deliverables Report to City Council Lead Andy Lewis Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: No funds available. Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison. Jan: Committee will meet to discuss first steps. Feb: This initiative will follow the lead of Initiative #2. Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Organized trash collection