Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-01-25 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Packet
Ag enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota City H all Council Chambers Wednesday, Januar y 25, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. Participate in Public Hearings Call 786-496-5601 E nter Confer ence Pin 5620740# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to g et in the queue to speak An operator will intr oduce you when it is your turn I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Draft Minutes of Regu la r Meetin g Janua ry 11, 2023 V.Com m u n ity Com m ent During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Pu b lic Hea rings A.B-23-03 5200 Gorga s Ave. Va ria n ce Req u est B.Zon ing Ordin ance Am endm en t - Mu lti-fa m ily hou sin g in th e City 's Com m ercial zonin g districts VII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents VIII.Sta1 Com m ents A.2023 W ork Pla n IX.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli8cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: January 25, 2023 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes of R egular Meeting January 11, 2023 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the draft minutes from J anuary 11, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Minutes of Regular Meeting January 11, 2023 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers January 11, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Strauss, Gandhi, Padilla, Smith and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner, Addison, Lewis, Community Development Coordinator, Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Alkire, and Hu. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the January 11, 2023, agenda. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, December 14, 2022 Commissioner Padilla moved to approve the December 14, 2022, meeting minutes. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. B-23-02 9.6 Foot 1st Floor Height Variance for 4920 Sunnyslope Rd E Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request for a 9.6 Foot 1st Floor Height Variance. Staff recommends approval of the 9.6 Foot 1st Floor Height Variance for 4920 Sunnyslope Rd E, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Mr. Rich Coughlin, 4920 Sunnyslope Road E, applicant, answered Commission questions. Public Hearing No comments were received through www.BetterTogetherEdina.org Mr. Kirk Aadalen, 4800 Hilltop Lane, addressed the Commission and indicated he had concerns about border trees, drainage and did not know how this new project was different from the one before. He noted he was not in favor of the proposal. Ms. Amy Aadalen, 4800 Hilltop Lane, addressed the Commission and explained her family was not opposed to building but thought this application was different than the other projects where homes are being built in the neighborhood. She agreed with the previous commenter and was not in favor of this. Mr. Sven Gustafson, 153 Lake Street W., Wayzata, addressed the Commission and indicated everything conforms with all of the setbacks. Mr. Steve Lundberg, 4801 Hilltop Lane, addressed the Commission via online. He thought this will be a dramatic change on Sunnyslope and he would like to see a little more setback with the variance. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Thought staff did an excellent job explained the one variance required Willingness and commitment to correct previous variances and to have them removed Current tree ordinance is an improvement to the project Meets all guidelines Hardscape is within the bounds and does not take up too much area Does not change the character of the neighborhood and will be a nice addition to the neighborhood Design is similar to other homes in the neighborhood Looks like a positive change Motion Commissioner Smith moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 9.6 Foot 1st Floor Height Variance for 4920 Sunnyslope Rd E., as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Accessory Dwelling Units Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Community Development Coordinator Lewis presented the Advisory Communication regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). Staff recommends the City move forward with the creation of an ordinance allowing ADUs, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Motion Commissioner Padilla moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Advisory Communication regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions Received. IX. Chair and Member Comments Received. X. Staff Comments Received. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Strauss moved to adjourn the January 11, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:06 PM. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: January 25, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-23-03 5200 G orgas Ave. Varianc e R eques t Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance request based on the findings and conditions as listed in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he applicant is asking for a 10-foot front yard and 11.4-foot rear yard variance for a teardown/ rebuild new home on a conforming lot at 5200 Gorgas Ave. T he request for front and rear yard setback variances allows the construction of a new house on a 58-foot-deep, nonconforming lot. T he minimum required lot depth in the R -1, S ingle D welling Unit D istrict is 120 feet. T he home design conforms to all other codes with the exception of front and rear setback due to extremely shallow lot depth. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Engineering Memo Site Location Narrative Plans Renderings Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Pres entation January 25, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-2 3 -0 3 , Variance to request. Recommended Action: Approve the v ariance request for a 10 -foot front yard and 11.4 -foot rear yard setback variance for a tear-down /re-build on property located at 5200 Gorgas Ave. Information / Background: The applicant is requesting variances to teardown/rebuild a home on a shallow, 58-foot-deep lot requiring variances from the front , (north ), lot line and south , (rear), lot line. This property is located along the south side of west 52 nd Street and was originally a corner lot with frontage/addressing along Gorgas Ave., (to the east). Prior to vacating Gorgas, the front yard of the property had been east with a front yard setback taken from the east lot line with a side street setback alon g the north lot line/W. 52 nd St. The existing home on the property is a one level rambler built in 19 65. The n ew home will provide greater setbacks to the north and south than provided by the existing home. The new home will improve upon existing setbacks of the current home allowing for greater spacing distance from neighboring property . It should be noted that the applicant owns both the subject property and the property directly south of the subject property. The owner’s goal is to build a house at 5200 Gorgas for parents to live in next to their primary home at 5205 Halifax Ave. In staff’s analysis, the proposed home fits the char acter of the neighborhood regarding height, scale, and massing. There have been several teardown/re-builds in this neighborhood with the proposed home in scale with other properties. The new home will have height below the maximum height restriction and below the maximum coverage. Setback variances to locate a house on the lot is unavoidable. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low -density residential. Easterly: Town homes; zoned PRD-3 and guided med-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low -density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low -density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 8,730 square foot lot is located adjacent to single family homes and townhomes to the east. The existing home is to be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Engineering The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments in the attached memo. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed Front – North Side - East Side– West Rear - South 3 0 feet 10 feet 10 feet 2 5 feet *20 feet 36.8 feet 21 feet *13.6 feet Building Coverage Impervious Surface 2,250 sq ft 50% 2,203 sq ft 35.5% Building Height 1 st floor Height 40 feet 879.7 feet 29.77 feet 879.6 feet *Variance required STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Does the proposed new home meet the criteria for approval of variances ? Staff believes the proposal meets the criteria for a variance to allow a teardown /re-build at 5200 Gorgas Ave. with a 10-foot front yard and a 11.4 -foot rear yard setback variance for the following four reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning stan dards, with exception of setback from the north and south lot lines . The practical difficulty is the required distance from the north and south setbacks due reorientation of the front yard caused by vacating Gorgas Ave. The rearrangement of north/front yard and south/rear yard was caused by the vacation of Gorgas Ave. and n ot by action of the property owner. The required setbacks render the lot unbuildable. 2. The variance allows the new home to maintain comfortable distance s from north and south lot lines and are at greater distances than a typical side street an d interior side yard setback. The required front and rear setbacks provide no opportunity for a building footprint depth. 3. The proposed home fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. 4. The new home could be taller from existing grade and cover more property area than designed reflecting conditions that are more normally occurring within the neighborhood. The lot shares boundaries with a property in common ownership allowing parents to live adjacent and age in place near extended family members . Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: STAFF REPORT Page 4 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey date stamped : December 23, 2023. • Building plans and elevations date stamped : December 23, 2023. 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo dated January 18, 2023 . 3. Compliance with the tree ordinance. Deadline for a City decision: February 21, 2023. DATE: 1/18/23 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 5200 Gorgas Ave - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included a survey and stormwater management plan stamped 12/21/22. Summary of Work The applicant proposes a demo/rebuild project. The request is for a variance to the setbacks. Easements Note, the roadway easement was vacated but 10’ of the utility easement was maintained for the power. Grading and Drainage The majority of the site drains south to private property. A portion drains north to 52nd St W. Existing and proposed grading is mostly consistent, with a less than 600 SF net increase in impervious north. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. The supporting hydrocad report will be required at permit review. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. Final grade as-built to confirm EOF path remains as-is. Floodplain Development The local 1% annual chance floodplain elevation in subwatershed MHN_61 is 877.4’. Thus, the lowest opening elevation is required at no less than 879.4’. The proposed garage floor elevation is 879.6’. The survey must include the proposed lowest opening elevation at permit review for confirmation. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to relocate the existing curb cut. A driveway entrance permit will be required. The street was reconstructed in 2015. Refer to standard plates 540 and 542 for patching requirements. Miscellaneous Water and sanitary is served from 52nd St W. Existing water service is 1”. A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required, applicant will need to verify with the district. A well is not likely located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. 5200 Gorgas Ave Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS, © WSB & Associates 2013 January 10, 2023 0 80 16040 ft 0 25 5012.5 m 1:632 ACDC architects 5200 Gorgas Ave variance application responses CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 The Proposed Variance will: NNIHr DEPARTMENT Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonable Yes, the proposed variance will relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance due to the irregular original platting of the lot. The lot was originally platted to face Gorgas Ave, which has since been vacated. The current platting is now facing 52w' St W, which results in front and rear yard setbacks that would be un-buildable for any new construction. The proposed use is for a single-family home with one-level living to be occupied by the applicant's parents. The applicants live at 5205 Halifax Ave, which directly abuts 5200 Gorgas Ave to the south. The proposed new home would provide multi-generational living in close proximity, and is reasonable for the surrounding area of other single-family homes. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district Yes, the proposed variance will correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. The subject property is the only lot in the area that was originally platted to face the vacated Gorgas Ave, and is burdened with un-buildable front and rear yard setbacks. There are 3 adjacent properties of similar lot size (5201 Halifax Ave, 5136 Gorgas Ave, and 5137 Halifax Ave) that all contain homes of similar size to our proposal but do not have the un-buildable setback restrictions due to their platting. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinance Yes, the proposed variance is in harmony with the following stated objectives of the Edina zoning code: Maintain, protect and enhance single-family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use. The proposed project helps protect and enhance the existing single-family detached dwelling neighborhood by replacing an existing home in disrepair and providing a new single-family detached home to current standards and codes that will be used for decades or centuries to come. Protect surface water and groundwater supplies; minimize the possibility of periodic flooding resulting in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards and related adverse effects. The proposed development takes care to protect surface water and minimize the possibility of periodic flooding by careful design of proposed grading and an infiltration trench to retain rainwater on-site. The property falls within 10% and 1% annual chance floodplains, and our stormwater management plan has been designed in consultation with city engineers. Our proposed building coverage (25.2%) and impervious coverage (35.5%) exceed the zoning regulations by at 10-15% Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhood Yes, the proposed variance will not alter the essential character of a neighborhood. The proposed design is harmonious in size, style, and materials with surrounding homes in the neighborhood. The essential character of the street will be improved by replacing an aged structure with a new home that is designed to embrace this walkable neighborhood with a welcoming front facade and updated design. CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACDC architects Arthur - Heikes Resic 9200 Got gas Ave Ecina 55z24 Variance Application 12-20-2022 SHEET INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY ence CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 1 2022 DEF"AliTMENT ARCHITECT: Andy Campbell Design Company Andy Campbell 612-432-1891 andyAa CVR COVER & RENDERINGS So EXHIBIT A - SURVEY PROPOSED SITE, EROSION CONTROL, AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN S2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Ain ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Ai.i CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN A2.1 MAIN & UPPER LEVEL PLANS A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Mitiriptisegiostommidatimm Project Renderings Residence cr) (1) a) > N • — < (ll n iU ro LC) I Z O 2 0 o ,-(13 o <LO W Signature cc-55, thst ,51,5 area 15, und. 5,5,5. and that I am t5ly re,t5red the 131.5 th, of 11.15-.15 /1117 S'gnatere Andrew Campbell Name December., 2022 Date 49940 Registration Number Architect Are5 Carr915510.,,C5,-0. mE 5. 51 551e Woe,. MN 55. 652-55,7064 andoe56.55 coin Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History Sheet Title COVER SHEET Sheet Number CVR '''ACDC 2022 --149.78-- West 52nd Street COI.' Curb ,Benchmork: seal ...t vrev eeea Nast rim AIM_ 887.9 / X8791 X OM 93 8793 .7 14726 8795 .13792 . I DSTS--------)1< , r 89:59'.5 '"*.m-AC 877.4 X .7 X 11794 .21. 1 741.a 0796 J70 retrer-Dar k,-- 1", ,73 )If E ?')6 k 4772 .rr.. % (0„,i .3'-‘1 8776 X 8778 X 077.5 c....,-, 0... ve Xat 878 INA \aasZto:/ 877,6 '-' 877.49/ ( 77 en , --a--- X8797 S.o e,, 1379.4 . 7 :::: , ::::,55 X 8795 X Otsv X -..\_.........- I *8797 1 41 \ %I erSai I t4 I I ?771.1 1 a re:4 ritz 7 ;4_3 I R) 8e40 Fa* oxped Ivo 8797 17/ /2.£ /' / ,,°_ ‘, It- / -1 / Dwelling Gower / f7oor 879.7 / o ft / 782 't8 .3". 1 1 -- - - __,_,Lt--?.i v v ..11/ /SU 7 c,,,,, . T.,,4‘,B,f7 -f-e- al--tA,7--•24.-4.-t. . - ....-....._ 877 7 3 8 --149.93-- .45 ,.. H , .4,4: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East half of Lot 39, Block I, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as casements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 5. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 6. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 7. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 8. The vacated easement document also reserves a 10 foot utility easement for the power lines and poles. The easement is not specifically described and research should be done to figure out the location of said easement before using this survey to design anything for this site. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. LEGEND ill a CATCH SAM eAS METER - I1u MOM O POMP POLE • . WOOS • a 1111,34316 Pm 511 DEC. TRUISM. ▪ WU O a BATE SAW -0- a WIT ME -4,:f 0 a TREE -mama - - SAMTIAT SE9fl1 LSE -V- a RATER IRIE - 0- a OAS WE -ST- - STIRS 7.041 UE - a OVERNEAD uTe1rc LOIE - WICRFIE SURFACE TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,050 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 23.5% EXISTING HARDCOVER EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE House 1,605 Sq. Ft. House 1,505 Sq. Ft. Bituminous Driveway 511 Sq. Ft. Concrete Surfaces 34 Sq. Ft. TOTAL BUILDING COV. 1,505 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF BLDG. COV. TO LOT 17.2% ORATING OREWFADON & SCALE grid F 0 20' 0 20 40 • •• • • • CLEXTIAME/JOBADCRESS ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN CO. 5200 GORGAS AVENUE EDINA, MN Advance Surveying 8 Engineering, Ca 17917 NW, 7 ster4ttota, Mow. 55345 Phone (952)4767064 WAR .6.441,93r I WEST CfROR MU 145 RIR MET 03 RPM 103 SWAM VC IR CR MIS( MC 96113.961 11.47 I AS A SAT 3305RRE0 VW. WERT ;IF/ WASSOCA 042379 [FUSE OCTOBERS% 2022 SHEET ME EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY DeAVNIGNIABai 221885 TB SHEET SIZE 17 X 22 NIES NO. SI WEFT 1071 DATE REVS. DESORIP TON DATESURETED OCTOBER 10,2022 WE DURSO OCTOBER 19.2022 3.3.614 0w. - -149.93- - / lk-67::10T/S. i i (71 V 93 44 i 1 EXHIBIT A - SURVEY ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 1 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Signature tattela, certfy tna Ka 0058 ,ranpaat at Pre,. u an 81,,a8a, at,a, rann•an ard lhat I an a 8.4 regale. aecntect Lad,. the La Al Of ale SW, ot Mmascia 41111 11 V Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 20.2022 Date 49940 Registration Number Architect Ana, CarrsbelL Dean, Sampan? E aftM1 St Sate FInnaapots 554. 512-a..70. ter,katudocom Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History 1.88 issued For Sheet Title SURVEY Sheet Number So Residence Existing Dwelling PACDC. 2022 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The East half of Lot 39, Block I, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey dues nut purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. 5. Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines, are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. 6. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 7. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark fur your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction. 8. The vacated easement document also reserves a 10 foot utility easement for the power lines and poles. The easement is not specifically described and research should be done to figure out the location of said easement before using this survey to design anything for this site. 9. While we show a proposed location for this home or addition, we are not as familiar with your proposed plans as you, your architect, or the builder are. Review our proposed location of the improvements and proposed yard grades carefully to verify that they match your plans before constniction begins. Also, we are not as familiar with local codes and minimum requirements as the local building and zoning officials in this community are. Be sure to show this survey to said officials, or any other officials that may have jurisdiction over the proposed improvements and obtain their approvals before beginning construction or planning improvements to the property. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fencoblo roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short tem construction activity but mast be replaced before the next rain. • A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet front the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets• walks or alleys, Potential entrances that are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided an alt proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or inn manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When din stockpiles have been created, a double raw of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 Iblacre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These &musters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent propenies. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete track washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid w. INSTALL NEW CLWGRETE DRIP£WA APRON PDT aTY OF EOM STANDARD PLATE 400. REPAIR EXISTING CONC CURS A CUTTER AS NEED PER STANDARD PLATE 508 SAW CUT REMOVAL AREAS REPAIR STREET PER STANDARD PLATES 540 & 545 %0772 X477, Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and Winter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rock entrance areas • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Notable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. • Wit becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves the site. • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days Mier the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-1 I I at 100113/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an "as built" survey shall be dune per City of Edina requirements to insure that grading Was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for steep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. INSTALL SILT FENCE/R/0 ROLL Benchmark: West 52nd I Street Coec. Curb %137&9 X B79 r--INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER NOTES N --149.78-- Existing Dwelling INSTALL sx7. _ !r.$)t j 1777a X FENCE/RIO ROLL --- JZO 1,0 k73 "1 r 41.t 5 creta LEGEND EXISTING GONRTUR LUSTING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED LI9N70UR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE ARROW - ROW SILT FENCE/$/O ROLL MEE REMOVAL PROTECT EXISTING TREE (INSTALL ORANGE CONN: FENCE AROUND TREE 70 PROTECT) X /379.5 879.5 SF" [ EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE HOUSE 1,505 50. FT. TOTAL BUILDING COO. 1,505 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF BLDG. COO. TO LOT 17.2% EXISTING HARDCOVER HOUSE 1,505 SO. FT. BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY 511 SO. FT. CONCRETE SURFACES 34 SO. FT. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,050 SO. FT. AREA OF LOT 0,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 23.5% PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE HOUSE 2,203 SO. FT. TOTAL BUILDING COO. 2,203 Sq. Ft. AREA OF LOT 8,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF BLDG. COO. TO LOT 25.2% PROPOSED HARDCOVER HOUSE 2,203 SO. FT. RETAINING WALL 34 SO. FT. CONCRETE SURFACES 882 SO. FT. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 3,099 SO. FT. AREA OF LOT 8,730 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 35.5% PROPOSED CONC. STOOP--a' INSTALL SILT FENCE/RIO Ra R77.9 et ...„‘ , ,11788.re77.8 --149.93-- S 8945'31" W PROPOSED RETNN/NO WALL -- (UNDER TALL) PROPOSED 16471.717A 770N---• TRENCH (SEE DETAIL) 67B V.4.9.111, -- ..1127=87118 ,/ t'4 ; Toa ovou, am 879.7 Lob --149.93-- twos 7/1 Advance Surveying B Engineedng, Co. 17917H.eatra77 Woe... Oro.. 5510 ROM PO) 4741. W. r can IUOt woo rot it 91778 stat N POW ILO NOM VW OR MA Of MU 9,17.01 NO NAT I IN A DAY AMMO WO SWAIM 1A0I707 MOM op... At oAo. A42379 .MME. NOVEMBER 30.2022 SHEETTinE PROPOSED SITE, EROSION CONTROL &TREE PROTECTION PLAN MMHG NUMBER 222246 JR SHEET SGE 17 X 22 WEIN° SI SHEETIOF2 12-18-21 081E Koster lallieRsanCo BOYEO PROP. no. Raw 2. • A00.187 otapero/sTcannolER DFUORNGORENTATON8 SCALE SCALE - • 20' A 0 20 40 INI IN • • • CUENDLWEI.08 ADDRESS ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN CO. 5200 GORGAS AVENUE EDINA, MN WE %Envie OCTOBER 19 2022 DATECRArTED NOVEMBER 30.2922 39.3 W ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 cs1G DEPARTMENT Residence Signature here!, crony taw ahs pan slaeokalon or report as Dreg."a by re. tee ..Mw Ree000n and toe I am a rnav regsteezdarchteci Leder Ne Das of 1..5/ate cA Woes. 1(1/1111 wV Signature Name December zo,2021 Date 48948 Registration Number Architect A"0/ Carrpb61.5.7, COTP., E AO St Date B eapa S14,15:404 xx,,,70,=ereocorn Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History Date taxer, CP Sheet Title PROPOSED SITE PLAN Sheet Number S AndrewCampbell PACDC, 2022 / X 87.1 72 X 877.4 Cone. Curb XeTbe VOA A.- X0704 N 89'59'3 117i WE,1 8)93 X -740b' --149.93-- : S 89'45131" W1 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL --I (UNDER 3' TALL) PROPOSED INFILTRATION-1 TRENCH (SEE DETAIL) 152 101.07Q8 2/ MOO _12.1AX 10' DIAMETER - WOOD CHIP, STRAW WATTLE OR COCONUT FIBER SLOPE VARIES \ I .X1" WOOD STAKE MIN. MAX 3' SPACING 6: OVERLAP GEOTEXTTLE FABRIC R: 6' AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC - OVERLAP FABRIC 6' AND FASTEN AT 2' INTERVALS WRE MESH REINFORCED LAY FABRIC IN THE TRENCH FABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH BACKFILL TRENCH WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL :9,: DRERioN 0±RUNOFF-4 1. NO REDUCTION OF FLOODPLAIN STORAGE VOLUME (BELOW ELEVATION 877.4) ON PROPERTY. • EXISTING FLOODPLAIN STORAGE VOLUME = 494 CUBIC FEET • PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN STORAGE VOLUME = 561 CUBIC FEET (ABOVE GROUND STORAGE) 12' AIIN\ STORMWATER REQUIREMENTS I/1N. I. VOLUME CONTROL - ONSITE RETENTION OF MIDS 1.1-INCH STORM EVENT OVER ADDED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. SUPPORT POST ANCHORAGE I INPLACE SUL SILT FENCE NO SCALE 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK FILTER FABRIC LINED TRENCH O11RLAP FABRIC `-12 ON EITHER SIDE OF TRENCH & STAKE DOWN EVERY 2' 870 878 ' 879 PROPOSED DISCHARGE (CFS) EXISTING DISCHARGE (CFS) 0.42 0.39 SCARIFY 12' BELOW-, ROCK SECTION SF El P1 INFILTRA770N TRENCH SECTION DETAIL NO SCALE 2' X 2' 11000 OR STEEL FENCE POST, 8' MAX. SPACING NOTES ATTACH FABRIC TO SUPPORT POSTS IWTH RINGS OR 14IRE 7/ES LEGEND D7S71NG CONFOOR DISNNG SPOT ELEVA 7709/ PROPOSED CO/TOUR DRAINAGE ARROW - 1100 SILT FENCE/1310 ROU DOSING DRAINAGE AREA ID PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREA ID -0 • CD (i) N o m > N < (1) Lo in mall z • o 2 0 _c O CD .4_, - • O N LO Signature hstetyce6f, Mat theoPee, hpectecahon or repeat as pre,. rre Lecke re, elrect stalehtesh ani Mat I ern away reg... ...el Leder the tees of ttte Stele al tent.. 4111it Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 20, 2022 Date 49940 Registratx. Number FLOODPLAIN STORAGE VOLUME REQUIREMENT EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 2,050 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3,099 SQUARE FEET ADDED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3,099 - 2,050 = 1,049 SQUARE FEET REQUIRED VOLUME TO RETAIN = 1,049 X (1.1/12) = 97 CUBIC FEET VOLUME OF RETENTION PROVIDED (INFL. TRENCH) = 130 CUBIC FEET STORMWATER RUNOFF RATE SUMMARY STORM EVENT 10-YEAR NOTES: 1. RESULTS ARE DERIVED FROM HYDROCAD MODELING SOFTWARE UTILIZING ATLAS 14 STORM DATA. 2. TYPE 8 SOILS PER WEB SOILS SURVEY. BIO ROLL NO SCALE i-VEGE TA DON (GRASS) I WjA"SHOFEDVR4OCK MIN. SALVAGED , CLEAN TOPSOIL ACC architects EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP PROPOSED DRAINAGE MAP INSTALL ROOT CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER NOTES `‘x fa, X 0704 r- INSTALL SILT FENCE/RIO ROLL West 52nd Street Cone Clmb Benchmark: West rkr, MIL_ 881.9 West 52nd Street X 078.7 X VI 07 X Exs. DW6111.179 Coroger fa'f''77 1776CF 55. 077A Ov.. 0877 2Uj'-' 410775 f7oor X ens 879.7 ry 1,44' L4T 6:/ " 6 6044-22 "7441.47-‘ 2760„ 11177 , 0772 y, XX, „ 8768 OW, 17703 1771.7 Benchmark: West den MN._ _a 881.9 INSTALL NOV CONCRETE DRIIEWAY APRON PER OTT OP EDINA STANDARD PLATE 402 REPAIR EXISTING CONC. .} CORE & 61177ER AS NEED PER STANDARD PLATE 500. SAW CUT REMOVAL AREAS REPAIR STREET PER STANDARD PLATES 540 4. 543 k,-,t I 0 4.) in !Ns 1 -- 0778% 28.2717-72. 4 67, 370 98 --149.23-- S 89'45'31" W I FBI -a a 12080 8.8780 887 0707 £644 N 2 INSTALL SILT--ens NCE/BIO ROLL 37.0 PROPOSED name STOOP-,' INSTALL SILT FENa-/BK ROLL--/ 0772 .177719-;; BM 778 778 877.2 te„ 11391X 879 TX 8I9S ~ 8795 5 1I eB64~ 88 8821 a H 1,} 84.1 O.A.- I I BELS CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 1 2022 E_ PARTMENT :ii" 171718 ? BBI g------ \-.,K .., . QB ,iliz_ 's ' .1 1....., ....q. . 5-5 50. x , ..;', , ,- - em k.q, \ s 1 4*1278.7 DATE RENS. DESCRIPTIDY 12-19-22 1.10112) PROP. HOYE 6401 2. 12 .0.)56 07401110/2T0RDIVATE111 DRAWNO OTERTATDN &SCALE SCALE - 1' = 2,5 \O CUENT11MEIJCBADDRESS ANDY CAMPBELL DESIGN CO. 5200 GORGAS AVENUE EDINA, MN Advance Surveying 8 Engineering, Co. OMIT WWI 1111110 5917, 91011X001 01 ROOT US /11110.107, ST1E De MY 10 PUT 4.1122.011 NO IWO I AY DAY U0.3) OM LOS 0/ Meda DATE SURVEYED. OCT. 18,2022 SURVEYED BY: SHEET TIRE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN DPALSOG MASER SHEET WE /7 X 22 Architect Andy Canyttecel Dehgt Ceteateei Eg.th St Su. 12 htnneatankshttl 65201 612.3.41-1064 • h.ciczbetto con, THOMAS U. BLOOM, PLS. 442370 ADVANCE SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. SHEET ND. S2 SHEET 2 0' 2 0 20 40 • NI 11 • IN • .9+. 17 1.147-011708.84774108 51.145 Rom (VAC 4747964 WW sw400.74487711 2716 OMB DRAFTED. NM 30,2022 LICEMSE NOVEMBER 30, 2022 DUE 222246 JR Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History oato issued For Sheet Title STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Sheet Number S2 T ACOS. 2022 149'-93/8" 18'-0" 877.2 21,0. -178 WALK 94 SF 9' 10.41. .870 879 SAVE/PROTECT EXISTING-TREE re• cut 0.: 9 -a • 1 SAVE/P' OTECT EXISTING TREE" 249 SF FOOTPRINT 879 j$877.6 879 ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 ;--)L,\NN;ING DEPARTMENT .877.4 5206GQRGAS AVE- MULCH PLANTING BED I .877.8 $876.7 PROPERTY LINE S EXISTING HOME .877.4 .877.7 M.877.5 $877.5 FL co c7) 4:4 DRIVEWAY 484 SF, 2'0 8 878.2 078.6 APRON .879.6 NEW CURB CUT .878.1 .878A $ 879.2 .878.8 i $879.3 PROPERTY LINE NE SINGLE'FAMILY HOME 32'-O 17' PROPOSED FRONT SETBACK 877.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/8"... r-o• .879.4 52ND ST W BOULEVARD SIDEWALK Ot, O N / 36,10V, 13, ,' SAVE/PROTECT ,, ,, o EXISTING TREE \ \ co C) , z r \ n 30' ACTUAL FRONT SETBACK 'l \ co o. 25' ACTUAL REAR SETBACK _, 01 1 o co, 15' PROPOSED REAR SETBACK a) U CD a) (r) icu > N < LO (13 14) I C 0 0 C7 _ "C a2 • 0 • — - N < LOW Signature I .reby certlyt.vs kan specafica,on «ra«n PeP'ea try rr., or 0,71., my clfect sk.,Xlvejon and V. I an a cUy Lrock,, tto., 0,5 of the Stale of Mnnes.. Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 20, 2022 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect InE2.515,103 Mrneapots Nt14 56454 61.2-354-7.4 .rnie.cstt.clo corn Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History Sheet Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Sheet Number A1.0 CACOC. 2040 8748765ETAINING 24,0" 25,8' Signature I.reby cedf y that speaficabon or report as prep.. lay meal rny next arx.vaisaan and that I am a rAdy registered arch-fe tdadar IM la as of Inv State of dnr,nso a Sigrlatare Andrew Campbell Name December 20, 2022 Date 49940 kegeaation Number Architect Andy Campbell Des, Codiaani 11 a6aM15t ...te Ninneapas Ml1 55-10-1 612.354-7064 Current Issue and, dacdcsturaa cam , la .. Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History • `10 .440 t air lig h. Sheet Title CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN Sheet Number A1.1 DACDC. 2022 1 F Ir_ PROPOSED SETBACKS SCALE: 1/3r =r-o• ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT EXISTING SETBACKS SCALE: 1/32" =1'•0' 3,6" 17,5' 6,101? 0 27 1 1 II 4,7" 1242' e 5,11? FAMILY ROOM 12041 ciG CLG 9' ECH 1 2°3 1 SCREEN WAL cr ll G SLOPED CIS NO" BATH 1202 1 CA.G. PG. 7LS 6,10131 21,6' 7,550 MAIN LEVEL PLAN SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0' BATH I 201 1 oI 1 I 209 1 BEDROOM 12001 CLO.CL9.0" STORAGE c.°. SLOPED 5'-11" BATH 1 207 WET BAR LG. SLOPED 1206 1 CtG O0 STORAGE 12001 CLG. SLOPEP9 I- 71 'I CLO 0-0> / 0917 rU .... , 4, 0- > -- 1 -- ,,, — 1 1 1 VERHANG ABOUI 1 1 1 1 I VERHANG v ABO 1 1 1 I 11 1 ii—.1 --N-1- 30° 1 PO — 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 FIREPLACE TV PANTRY 1 DW 1 I SER I 1 111111 W- _ _L _ _ L CLG. ©9,0- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L.jj t7 KITCHEN ri Li_t_li 1 El 14 OFFICE LIVING r4 1o71 CLG. @KA" a CD 0 =1 CD 0 BENCH/HOOKS I la 1 . I 105 1 . --1 IR V—' OWNER'S BEDROOM CLG. 0 9,0' CLG. (8 9,0" 1-1 1100 I I GIG. ea VG' ® 6 _ r J -I L 36° MUD I 09 I -1 .L_ -0- REF CLG.410140- VESTIBULE 1 I GARAGE ,4. 1 103 1 I I-0" d CLG. @ BO 1 I 1 111 1 GIG.. 9%0' 41. 44 I '—i_ 1-1 — SCREEN WALL J OWNER'S BATH DINING UP E 1 E 1 102 1 1 106 I I 17 .87 LAUNDRY • r _ r -1 r- 7 7 OVVNERS CLST CLG. fp 9,0' MG. 0 KO 110 I CI I A. 0) 9.0" 37 1 101 1 --- fi CLG. a kro __..! .., '‘,•' 6 cgs I 1 IIMO ENCH BENCH \ ElrEari 6W 5,91? 13,11? 10,8 6'-0• M III 7-0" 13,2' 9-0" 10,0" 8,0' 2-0' .,,. 8,0" 2-0" 8-0" ff 28,04 no. 92,0' 22.-B" ;11 OPEN RAILING GOLF SIM I 205 I GIG. 09-0. 9 BANOUETTE 15-9" UPPER LEVEL PLAN ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 1 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT U CD -(7; N W LL Li) W a) N < CD cf,Ln m 1° E`)Z o2 n 0 0 r° C 0 < C L71 Signature hceetqcedfy Oat .4 O., specifotOn a report as owe,ea try rrea to0er try deCt 5,4:40.,0arac014t I am a clity meowed aro,. Loa. Me 1244 of Oa SOO of 14nnesota 4/1111 /147 Signature Andrew Campbell Name December 20,2022 Date 49948 Registration Number Architect And, Carptell coogn 0041,44, in 2.021 .440 44044x121'4,44544$ 612-34i-7004 2,014Oucto corn Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History ksued Sheet Title MAIN & UPPER LEVEL PLANS Sheet Number A2.1 SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0" ®ACDC, 2022 CDC A architects AROMCTDRAL ASPHALT SHINGLEE ROOR • N BLACK W CIA IN D DO EX' W,E , R IT IOR P — rrE LAP COMPOSITE PAINTED C FA SCIA, TYP SOFFIT B°5797.0 SEERDE6 11 T R LRAE B.O. FLOOR 1 T 09 13D 0 % CITY OF EDINA DEC 21 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT L TRIM, PAINTED SIDICNOGM&POSITE TY(APP T7 ILL AT AT EDE CO EAR PA NDBR STUCCO &&Du FIRST LEVEL T.O. SEM,* =,79.E 879 = NEW AVE GRADE C -o NW LL a) > < U) L2_r_ cm z o 2 0 - 0 c 0 1— < v7 W NORTH ELEVATION 1/4" =1'-0° 879 6= FEE 879 =EFE E°iTiR911 USS 0- Signature cyme«.mi area reto, Laa, hi Sta iv Andrew agt"me b:C :e 02U Date Decem r 20, 49940 Reg Number 's" Architect Issue Application Current Variance 12-20-22 Revision History URAL ASPHALT T HITECT AR- C SHINGLE ROOF, TIP COMPOSITE LAP FASCIA, TIP PAINTED & SOFFIT s E LAP ED COMPO-if PAINT PA BLAsc IDKINCG LA>ERIM TyP WINDOWS, XTERIOPR SECOND LEVEL T.8. s 1 , 10. 8E -R EN19 7:94 B.O. FLOORT I0 11 9 U 4r SE. ;7, COAT AT lluuBREA GE X P R -- STUCCO DDO 00,0. T.O.5 FcI8NRS.Tc8 1.EV 7,9 E8E681.0c„. Sheet Title RIOR ELEVATIONS 878.5 = EXISTG AVERAGE GRADE AT s_ ELEVATION E CALE:1ei= Sheet Number 0 A3• ®ACOC. zeal CITY OF EDINA 878.5 = EXIST' AVE DEGRADE DEC 21 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" =1'-0• SECOND LEVEL LO.SURFER a., 110,8" ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, TYP BLACK CND EXTERIOR WINDOWS, TIP PAINTED COMPOSITE LAP SOFFIT & FASCIA, TYP PAINTED COMPOSITE LAP SIDING & TRIM, TYP STUCCO PARGE COAT AT GROUNDBREAK FIRST LEVEL T.O. CONC. SLAB Qk 100'-0'=179.E 879 = NEW AVE GRADE ACDC architects BLACK CLAD EXTERIOR — WINDOWS, IYP ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALT — SHINGLE ROOF, TYP PAINTED COMPOSITE LAP SOFFIT & FASCIA, TYP PAINTED COMPOSITE LAP SIDING & TRIM, TYP 9 SECOND LEVEL T.O. SU8FLR now', ;" B.O. FLOOR TRUSSa, 1094' Signature we kation or repst as PreINv. Iroretry certfy that Inc PLn by mn or lux. my Orr, antl that I am 0,4 re9derea al.tecte idAS d the State of Ninnescta '41 111V Sognature Andrew Campbell Name December 20, 2022 Date 49948 Regrstration Number Architect ami ,rrpt.IDes, m ego St sLrre remer04 NM 55. Ne-eserrer corn Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History We kgbed For STUCCO PARGE COAT AT GROUNDBREAK FIRST LEVEL T.O. CONC. SIAN, 1004N =575.9 879 = NEW AVE GRADE Sheet Title ELEVATIONS WEST ELEVATION SCALE: Mr = Sheet Number A3.1 OACDC, 2022 Residence AndrewCampbell Name December 20,2022 49940 RegstraUon Number Signature 11,22212, cedry Nal 1122 exon report 22 prepamd rne under ssiper.12.2 and that 1 ern a city re/221222d Erditect tre.r. L22-2012.512120112221252. 41111 hV Stnature bate Architect /My Carry552.1152252155,,5,/ 5122021525s125 55rneapots552 55251 012-352-7054 ancly3.2012512252com Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History We issued Fa Sheet Title COVER SHEET Sheet Number CVR r • r Arthur - Heikes Residence AC1) architects 5200 Gorcas Ave, Edina V \ 55/24 Variance Application 12-20-2022 SHEET INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY CVR COVER & RENDERINGS So EXHIBIT A - SURVEY 51 PROPOSED SITE, EROSION CONTROL, AND TREE PROTECTION PLAN S2 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN Ai.o ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Au CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN A2.1 MAIN & UPPER LEVEL PLANS A3.o EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ARCHITECT: Andy Campbell Design Company Andy Campbell 612-432-1891 andy@acdcstudio.com CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 3 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Project Renderings eACDC, 2022 EXISTING SETBACKS SCALE: 1/32" =1r-0" PROPOSED SETBACKS SCALE: 1/32° =1'-0" ACDC architects CITY OF EDINA DEC 2 3 2022 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Residence to CD a) > N • — < as Lc) Ln t2)Z " o2 0 0 -C ( o ,-13 4_, o — N 1:3 < Signature Itoeby certry Vottlas peen zereo,ton or rdpod as prepared by me or order my Erect eapoor,on ar, ori lam a ddy req.:teed arch tact ander ,e S.graatme Andrew Campbell Name December 20, 2022 Date 42048 14egatralon Number Architect AN/ Carord,113esgo Compaq, 111226,St Sate 0 rr,appla MN 20404 03,2,Fdea bat/ acdcar. o cern Current Issue Variance Application 12-20-22 Revision History Laarre ,ored For Shee Tulle CONTEXTUAL SITE PLAN Sheet Number A1.1 C,ACDC, 2022 Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-5200 Gorgas Ave. Better Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 5200 Gorgas Avenue VISITORS 4 CONTRIBUTORS 2 RESPONSES 2 0 Registered 0 Unverified 2 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 2 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 15, 2023 08:24:03 am Last Seen:Jan 15, 2023 08:24:03 am IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Andrew Arthur Q2.Address 5205 Halifax Ave. Q3.Comment My family and I are really excited about this project at 5200 Gorgas Ave. We expect the new house will update and enhance the neighborhood by offering a sophisticated modern traditional-style, eco-friendly house. Our hope is to build a house that will serve as an example of how to build a globally responsible house for the modern world. Respondent No:2 Login:Anonymous Email:n/a Responded At:Jan 15, 2023 14:26:00 pm Last Seen:Jan 15, 2023 14:26:00 pm IP Address:n/a Q1.First and Last Name Jill Rocheleau Q2.Address 5208 Halifax Ave S Q3.Comment Home looks well proportioned and that it will fit in well in the neighborhood. Looks like a thoughtful, asthetically pleasing design. I support the requested variance. Thank you. Variance request 5200 Gorgas Ave. Site location EdinaMN.gov 2 Existing home EdinaMN.gov 3 Existing home survey EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 Proposed home EdinaMN.gov 6 Proposed home survey EdinaMN.gov 7 EdinaMN.gov 8 EdinaMN.gov 9 EdinaMN.gov 10 EdinaMN.gov 11 EdinaMN.gov 12 EdinaMN.gov 13 EdinaMN.gov 14 EdinaMN.gov 15 EdinaMN.gov 16 EdinaMN.gov 17 Date: January 25, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Zoning O rdinanc e Amendment - Multi-family hous ing in the C ity's C ommercial zoning dis tric ts Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the O rdinance Amendment. I N TR O D U C TI O N: On December 8, 2022, the Edina H ousing and Redevelopment Authority approved an amendment to the City's affordable housing policy. (S ee attached policy with the approved edits and associated staff report.) T he P lanning Commission is asked to review and approve an Ordinance Amendment so that the E dina C ity C ode is consistent with the approved Affordable H ousing P olicy. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Ordinance Staff Report to the HRA Staff Pres entation to the HRA Approved Affordable Hous ing Policy with Changes Highlighted Approved Affordable Hous ing Policy - Approved by HRA on December 8, 2022 Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report ORDINANCE NO. 2022-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING HOUSING IN COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 36-612. - Conditional uses. (PCD Zoning Districts) is amended as follows: The following are the conditional uses permitted in the PCD-1 subdistrict: (1) PCD-1 and PCD-2 subdistricts. Multi-residential uses subject to following: a. New rental multi-family developments containing 20-units or more shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% area median income (AMI) or 20% residential units at 60% AMI. b. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at 80% AMI. c. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: 1. on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. 2. Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. 3. Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. d. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. e. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. f. The developers and/or owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant-based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding source. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This 2 requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. g. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at least every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. h. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: 1. Density bonuses 2. Parking requirement reductions 3. Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement 4. Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation 5. Property Tax Abatement i. In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: 1. Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. 2. Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. 3. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $100,000 $175,000 per unit (multiplied by 10% of total unit) rounding up to the next whole unit. The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. j. As allowing maximum density was intended to serve as a density bonus for the inclusion of affordable units, for mixed use developments that have densities 50% or greater of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For residential developments with densities 75% of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For example: 3 i. If zoning allows between 50-100 units per acre, and the residential development is 50-87 units per acre, the developer/owner may elect to include the affordable units into the development, pay the TBI fee, or an approved alternative. ii. If the proposed development is 88-100 units per acre, the development must include affordable units within the building. k. The owners and their agents of multi-family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Noncompliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. (2) PCD-3 subdistrict. c. Multi-residential uses subject to following: 1. New rental multi-family developments containing 20 units or more shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% area median income (AMI) or 20% residential units at 60% AMI. 2. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at 80% AMI. 3. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: (i) On-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. (ii) Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. (iii) Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. 4. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. 5. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. 6. The developers and/or owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant- based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant-based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding source. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt 4 business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. 7. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at least every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. 8. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: (i) Density bonuses (ii) Parking requirement reductions. (iii) Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement. (iv) Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation. (v) Property Tax Abatement. 9. In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: (i) Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. (ii) Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. (iii) An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $100,000 $175,000 per unit (multiplied by 10% of total unit) rounding up to the next whole unit. (iv) The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. 10. As allowing maximum density was intended to serve as a density bonus for the inclusion of affordable units, for mixed use developments that have densities 50% or greater of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For residential developments with densities 75% of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For example: 5 (i) If zoning allows between 50-100 units per acre, and the residential development is 50-87 units per acre, the developer/owner may elect to include the affordable units into the development, pay the TBI fee, or an approved alternative. (ii) If the proposed development is 88-100 units per acre, the development must include affordable units within the building. 11. The owners and their agents of multi-family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Noncompliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor December 8, 2022 Chair and Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Proposed Amendments to the New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy Information / Background: In 2015 the Edina Housing Foundation proposed an Affordable Housing Policy (“Policy”) that requires new residential development with greater than 20-units to include affordable housing units equaling 10% of the combined units’ square footage. In subsequent years the Policy was amended to include a Buy-In option, change the percentage based on the number of units verses square feet, a proportionality provision, and a requirement for non-discrimination of Housing Choice vouchers among other things. The Policy is periodically reviewed to determine if there are gaps in coverage, confusing elements, for ease in understanding, and to make sure the goal of creating affordable housing opportunities is met. Staff is now proposing three primary amendments: Increase the Buy-in from $125,000 per unit to $175,000 per unit. Require the inclusion of affordable units if the developer is seeking a density in the top half of the range. Require cooperation with the City designated compliance officer. Increasing the Buy-In In March 2021 the Buy-in amount was increased from $100,000 to $125,000 to address the increasing disparities between the cost of developing affordable housing and the cost to Buy-In. $125,000 was agreed upon as it aligned with the policies in Cities similar in size and demographics. However, in the heels of COVID the need for affordable housing has increased as have construction costs. The cost disparities continue to grow. Electing to Buy-In versus including affordable units is becoming an increasingly easier option, as indicated by the following: 1. Based on recent proposals, the cost of an affordable unit, including land, is roughly $330,000 per unit where the cost to construct a Market Rate housing unit is over $500,000 per unit. STAFF REPORT Page 2 2. For affordable housing, debt financing based on Net Operating Income account for between 30% and 70% of the Total Development cost. Therefore between 30% and 70% of the financing comes from tax credits and other public sources. Based on recent proposals the Buy-in amount of $125,000 is 38% of the cost to construct a unit and therefore does not cover the gap financing needed. 3. In looking at the rent levels of affordable units compared to market rate units over a 20-year period (using recent proposals as examples), a developer makes more than $326,000 on the market rate unit than on an affordable unit. 4. Since 2015, 118 affordable units were included in Market Rate developments compared to 142 units that were not included in favor of paying the Buy-In fee. Although the cost differential is roughly $326,000 per unit, Staff believes that that high amount would not only be a disincentive to selecting the Buy-In option but could also be a disincentive to residential development generally. As of now there is no defined amount for Buy-in that will dissuade developers from wanting to develop in Edina. We do not know the threshold that will cause developers to turn away because of the fee or not wanting to include the affordable units. Therefore, Staff proposes increasing the Buy-In to $175,000 per unit. This increase was reviewed and is supported by the Edina Housing Foundation. Inclusion Requirement The Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan (“Plan”) provides density ranges for housing units that can be built per acre. For example, in a High-Density Residential area between 12 and 60 housing units per acre are allowed. In Greater Southdale District Residential between 50 to 100 housing units per acre are allowed. Based on recently site plan applications, developers most frequently request maximizing the number of units allowed. The Comprehensive Plan does not indicate that the higher end of the range is deemed a “bonus” tied to affordable housing. Rather the Plan states that denser land use categories allow for the creation of affordable housing. Yet the Policy includes language that states that density bonuses can be used to make including affordable housing units within a market rate development financially feasible. The inclusion of the bonus language in the Policy reflects Staff’s intent that developments seeking the greatest density would include the affordable units within the development. An amendment to the Policy provides clarity to that intention. Staff is proposing a two-tiered system: Mixed Use Developments: Developments that are 50% or greater of the maximum within the density range must include affordable units within the development. Conversely, developments that are less than 50% the maximum density allowed in a range can choose to include the units or pay the Buy-in fee. All Residential Developments: Developments that are 75% or greater of the maximum density within the range must include affordable units within the development. Conversely, developments STAFF REPORT Page 3 that are less than 75% the maximum density allowed can choose to include the units or pay the Buy- in fee. Compliance Cooperation It would seem self-evident that the developers who include affordable units within their development would recognize that the City would need to confirm and verify the following: 1. Affordable units were included; 2. The rents on affordable units fall within the published affordable ranges; and 3. Tenants dwelling in affordable units are income qualified. Nonetheless some owners have resisted cooperating with the City’s compliance consultant and we have little recourse when no funding is involved. Staff believe it is important to make developers and owners aware before the development is approved that the City will confirm and verify that the included affordable units comply with the Policy. Alignment with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and Race & Equity Initiative 1. Comprehensive Plan The New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy is the City’s primary mechanism for creating affordable housing. Since its passage, the City has made great strides in creating more housing opportunities. The passages below are sections of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that support the proposed changes to the Policy. Goal 1: Accommodate all planned residential growth in the city based on planned infrastructure investments and other community goals and assets. 1. Seek to accommodate the total new households projected to locate in the city by the year 2040. 3. Recognize that successfully reaching affordable housing goals assists the city in achieving related community goals, including: f. Addressing climate change through higher density development patterns that help reduce vehicle emissions (see Energy and Environment Chapter) Goal 2: Encourage the development and maintenance of a range of housing options affordable to residents at all income levels and life stages. 1. Encourage the production of additional affordable housing units and retention of existing affordable housing units to meet the city’s housing needs and its Metropolitan Council affordable housing need allocation of 1,804 units. 4. Revisit height and density zoning requirements if needed to make the development of affordable housing financially feasible in areas guided for redevelopment. Goal 4: Support the development of a wide range of housing options to meet the diverse needs and preferences of the existing and future Edina community. 3. Promote affordable and workforce housing that includes a range of housing prices and options, based on the principle that those who contribute to the community should have the opportunity to live here. 7. Support the development of both mixed income and 100% affordable housing throughout Edina where there is access to transit. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Status on Achieving 2040 Affordable Housing Goal Forecasted Need Approved % of Need Remaining Total Units 1804 341 18.9% 1463 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9% 729 31-50% AMI 480 178 37.1% 302 51-80% AMI 573 141 24.6% 432 2. Race & Equity Initiative Periodically reviewing an updating the Policy aligns with Goal 16 of the 2018 Race & Equity Initiative Final Report and Recommendations. The report calls for the City to “Review policy with a race and equity lens to include language relating housing to equity and disparities” (page 42). The recommendation goes further by requesting the consideration of removing the Buy-In option. Staff does support collecting some Buy-in funds as they make possible different types of affordable housing programs that are not financed through traditional means. However, increasing the Buy-In amount addresses the concern raised by the Race & Equity Task Force by incentivizing the inclusion of the affordable units. Proposed Revisions to Affordable Housing Policy December 8, 2022 Today’s Request 1.Increase Buy-In Fee to $175,000. 2.In lieu of a density bonus, require the inclusion of affordable units when maximum density is being requested. 3.Require cooperation with third party compliance officer. EdinaMN.gov 2 Background Information •2015 Policy initially approved •2018 (winter) Buy-In option was added •2018 (Autumn) Affirmative Fair Marketing and Non- discrimination of Housing Choice Vouchers added •2019 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Created •Rents and incomes adjusted annually EdinaMN.gov 3 Proposed: $175,000 ➢Construction costs have increased ➢Development costs range from $300,000 to $515,000 per unit (affordable to luxury). ➢Increase fee to incentivize including units Current: $125,000 ➢Increased March 2021 ➢Based on other Communities Change #1: Buy-In Fee EdinaMN.gov 4 It is much more Cost Efficient for the Developer to Buy-In rather than to include an affordable unit: Over a 20-year period a developer’s revenue is significantly greater than $125,000 per unit in a 100% Market Rate Development. Conclusion: Over a 20-year period a100% Market Rate development has revenues $6,500,000 greater than an inclusionary development. This equates to $327,000 per unit that was not affordable (10% or 20 units). $125,000 is only 38% of the difference. •200 unit building with a mix of 1 and 2 bedroom units •Income escalator of 2% •20-year affordability Period •Comparing all market rate apartments to one that includes 10% of units at 50% AMI rents. •Market rate rents based on recent proposals. Basic Analysis EdinaMN.gov 5 Inclusion: •4917 Eden –20 units •4977 77th Street –20 units •Lorient –3 units •Avidor –18 units •Aria –8 units (4.3%) •Millenium –11 units (4.8%) •Nolan Mains –10 units •Fred II –28 units TOTAL: 118 units Buy-In: •Fred 1–in lieu of 41 units •Bower –in lieu of 19 units •7001 France –In lieu 27 units •Lorient –In lieu of 2 units •4425 Valley View –In lieu of 3 units •The Loden –in lieu of 25 units •The Onyx –25 units TOTAL: In lieu of 142 units Inclusion vs. Buy–in Comparison EdinaMN.gov 6 Affordable Housing Goal Affordable Housing Units Approved %Remaining Total Units 1804 341 18.9%1463 <30% AMI 751 22 2.9%729 31-50% AMI 480 178 37.1%302 51-80% AMI 573 141 24.6%432 Affordable Housing Goals EdinaMN.gov 7 •Edina has goal of creating 994 to 1804 new units of affordable housing. •Increases disincentive to Buy-In. •Construction costs are increasing --Buy-In fee does not go as far; --Increasingly less expensive to -Buy-In than to include units. •In 2018 Race & Equity Task Force proposed to Eliminate Buy-in option •No evidence that Buy-In fee is thwarting Developers from wanting to build in Edina Keep Buy-In Option –But increase EdinaMN.gov 8 Importance of Buy-In: Flexibility EdinaMN.gov 9 Affordable Housing Trust Fund Estimated Balance Requests Beginning Balance*$ 8,460,000 Market Street (2019)($750,000) 4d Pilot Program 2018 -NO TAKERS ($160,000) 4d Pilot Program -2019 ($50,000) Single Family Ownership Program (2020)($840,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (Pilot)($250,000) 425 Jefferson ($152,717) Single Family Ownership Program (2021)($1,500,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (Aug. 2021)($750,000) LISC Single Family Partnership Program ($1,260,000) Home Rehabilitation Program (2022)($500,000) First Generation Grant ($150,000) Ending Balance $ 2,402,717 •Making loans at interest rates below or at market rates. •Guaranteeing of loans. •Providing gap financing for affordable housing developments. •Financing the acquisition, demolition, and disposition of property for affordable housing projects. •Financing the rehabilitation, remodeling, or new construction of affordable housing. •Funding to facilitate affordable homeownership opportunities including down payment assistance, second mortgages, closing costs, etc. •Interim financing of public costs for affordable housing projects in anticipation of a permanent financing source (i.e. construction financing, bond sale, etc.) •Other uses as permitted by law and approved by the city council. Affordable Housing Trust Fund EdinaMN.gov 10 Policy Language: Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: •Density bonuses •Parking requirement reductions Etc. Change #2: Regarding Density “Bonuses” EdinaMN.gov 11 Type of Zoning Density Range Mixed Use Residential Only High Density Residential 12-60 >= 36 units >= 48 units Greater Southdale Residential 50-100 >= 75 units >= 88 units Neighborhood Node 10-60 >= 35 units >= 48 units Office Residential 20-75 >= 48 units >= 61 units Mixed Use Center 12-100 >= 56 units >= 78 units Community Activity Center 90-150 >= 120 units >= 135 units Regional Medical Center 50-100 >=75 units >= 88 units Inclusion Required EdinaMN.gov 12 > 50% Max > 75% Max Example 1: •Density range 50-100 units per acre •Proposal is 95 units/acre (90% of Max) Requirement: Development must include affordable units. Example 2: •Density range 50-100 units/acre •Proposal is 70 units/acre (40% of max) Requirement:Either Buy-In, inclusion or blend. Density Level May Require Inclusion EdinaMN.gov 13 Project Project Density Comp. Plan % of Density Onyx–240 units (0 affordable)53 units/acre 75 units/acre 71% Lorient –46 units (3 affordable)50 units/acre 60 units/acre 83% Nolan Mains –100 units (10 aff.)74 units/acre 75 units/acre 99% The Loden –246 units (0 affordable)10 units/acre 30 units/acre 33% Pentagon Village–200 units (20 aff.)16 units/acre 75 units/acre 21% 70th and France –267 units 46 units/acre 150 units/acre 31% Approved Density: Mixed Use EdinaMN.gov 14 Project Project Density Comp. Plan % of Density Aria –185 units (8 affordable)93 units/acre 100 units/acre 93% Millennium –375 units (11 aff.)66 units/acre 105 units/acre 63% Avidor –166 units (16 aff.)95 units/acre 100 units/acre 95% Sound on 76th –70 units (all aff.)35 units/acre 40 units/acre 75% Edina Flats–18 units (0 aff.)14 units/acre 30 units/acre 47% Amundson Flats–62 units (all aff.)50 units/acre 50 units/acre 100% Hazelton Road Apts. –186 units 149 units/acre 150 units/acre 99% 4040 70th Street –118 aff.75 units/acre 75 units/acre 100% Perkins Site –196 units (20 aff.)94 units/acre 100 units/acre 94% Approved Density: Residential EdinaMN.gov 15 Add: •The owners and their agents of multi- family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Non-compliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. •Amend rent, sales price, and income limits Change #3: Cooperation EdinaMN.gov 16 City Comparisons City # Units to Trigger Affordability Requirements Term of Affordability Buy-In Edina 20 10% @ 50% AMI or 20% @ 60% AMI 20-years $125,000*10% Minnetonka 10 10% @60% with Minimum of 5% @ 50% AMI. If City $: 20% @ 50% AMI or 40% @ 60% AMI.30-years NA St. Louis Park 10 5% @ 30% AMI; 10% @ 50% AMI; 20% @ 60% AMI 25-years Ownership Only Eden Prairie 15 5% @30% AMI, or 10% at 50% AMI, or 15% @ 60% AMI in perpetuity NA Richfield 5 20% @ 60% AMI 10-years 15% NPV of Tax increment pledged for 10-years Golden Valley 10 10% @50% AMI or 15% @60% AMI 20-years NA EdinaMN.gov 17 EdinaMN.gov 18 Location of Affordable Housing EdinaMN.gov 19 Questions? ☐City Council Approved: 11/1/2015 ☒City-Wide Revised: 3/25/2021 ☐Department City of Edina Policy NEW MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING The City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live or work in the City. Since the land appropriate for new multi-family residential development is limited, it is essential that a reasonable proportion of such land be developed into affordable housing units. As such, the City of Edina adopts the following New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS POLICY: 1. “Unit” means either a for-sale dwelling or a rental dwelling in which a lease is signed prior to occupancy. 2. “Financial Assistance” provided the City includes but is not limited to tax increment financing, land write downs, pass-through funding for purposes other than environmental remediation and other forms of direct subsidy. 3. Any specific projects requesting exemptions to the affordable housing requirements of this policy must seek recommendation from the Edina HRA and approval from the Edina City Council based on alternative public purpose. 4. All new multi-family developments of 20 units or more must adhere to this policy and must be zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. 5. Affordable Rental Housing Income and Rents are defined as both gross incomes (adjusted for family size) and gross rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and include utility allowance and any fees that are a requirement of occupancy as per Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Service Code.) that are updated annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and published at www.mnhousing.gov. 2020 income and rental limits can be found at the end of this policy. 6. Affordable Ownership Housing Income and Sales Price are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below 80% of Area median Income. THIS POLICY APPLIES TO ALL NEW MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT: 1. Include 20 units of more. 2. Require rezoning or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3. Receive financial assistance from the City of Edina and/or the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 4. Are developed on property purchased from the City of Edina even if no financial assistance is being provided by the City unless the waiver is recommended by the Edina HRA and approved by the Edina City Council. Page | 2 THE POLICY 1. New rental multi-family developments subject to this policy shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% affordable rental rates or 20% residential units at 60% affordable rental rates as defined below. The units shall be occupied by households at or below 60% of the Multi- Family Tax Subsidy Income Limits (MTSP). 2. New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at affordable sales prices as defined below. 3. The affordable unit mix must be approximately proportional to the market rate unit mix. 4. Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: a. on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. b. Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. c. Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. 5. New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years if seeking a PUD and zoning amendment without City financing or 30-years if City financing is approved. and this This requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. 6. New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. 7. The developers and/or owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant-based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding sourced. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. 8. Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at lease every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. 9. Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: a. Density bonuses b. Parking requirement reductions c. Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement Page | 3 d. Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation e. Property Tax Abatement 10. It is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing on site. However, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: a. Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. b. Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. c. An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $125,000 $175,000 per unit rounding up to the next whole unit. The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. 11. As allowing maximum density was intended to serve as a density bonus for the inclusion of affordable units, for mixed use developments that have densities 50% or greater of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For residential developments with densities 75% of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For example: a. If zoning allows between 50-100 units per acre, and the residential development is 50-87 units per acre, the developer/owner may elect to include the affordable units into the development, pay the TBI fee, or an approved alternative. b. If the proposed development is 88-100 units per acre, the development must include affordable units within the building. 12. The owners and their agents of multi-family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Non- compliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. 13. Guidelines for implementing this Affordable Housing Policy can be found in the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide. 202022 INCOME AND RENTAL LIMITS Please refer to the income and rent tables published on www.mnhousing.gov. 201822 OWNERSHIP HOUSING INCOME AND SALES PRICE GROSS INCOMES GROSS RENTS 60% 50% 60% 50% 1 Person $43,440$49,320 $36,200 $41,100 Studio $1,086 $1,233 $905 $1,027 Page | 4 2 Persons $49,680 $56,340 $41,400 $46,950 1 Bedroom $1,164 $1,320 $970$1,100 3 Persons $55,860 $63,360 $46,550 $52,800 2 Bedroom $1,396 $1,584 $1,163$1,320 4 Person $62,040 $70,380 $51,700 $58,650 3 Bedroom $1,613 $1,830 $1,344$1,525 5 Persons $67,020 $76,020 $55,850 $63,350 4 Bedroom $1,800$2,041 $1,500$1,701 Acquisition Limit in this policy definition: $293,500$355,000 20202 income limits as published on the Metropolitan Council website are as follows: 80% of AMI ($78,500$89,400) Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. See www.mnhousing.gov and https://metrocouncil.org/Communities/Services/Livable-Communities-Grants/Ownership-and-Rent- Affordability-Limits.aspx Originally adopted: November 1, 2015 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: April 13, 2016 As amended: February 7, 2018 As amended: April 3, 2018 As amended: October 2, 2018 As amended: March 5, 2019 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: December 10, 2020 As amended: March 25, 2021 As Amended: ☐City Council Approved: 11/1/2015 ☒City-Wide Revised: 12/8/2022 ☐Department City of Edina Policy NEW MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING The City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority recognize the need to provide a range of affordable housing choices for those who live or work in the City. Since the land appropriate for new multi-family residential development is limited, it is essential that a reasonable proportion of such land be developed into affordable housing units. As such, the City of Edina adopts the following New Multi-Family Affordable Housing Policy. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS POLICY: 1.“Unit” means either a for-sale dwelling or a rental dwelling in which a lease is signed prior to occupancy. 2.“Financial Assistance” provided the City includes but is not limited to tax increment financing, land write downs, pass-through funding for purposes other than environmental remediation and other forms of direct subsidy. 3.Any specific projects requesting exemptions to the affordable housing requirements of this policy must seek recommendation from the Edina HRA and approval from the Edina City Council based on alternative public purpose. 4.All new multi-family developments of 20 units or more must adhere to this policy and must be zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. 5.Affordable Rental Housing Income and Rents are defined as both gross incomes (adjusted for family size) and gross rental rates (adjusted for bedroom count and include utility allowance and any fees that are a requirement of occupancy as per Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Service Code.) that are updated annually by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) and published at www.mnhousing.gov. 2020 income and rental limits can be found at the end of this policy. 6.Affordable Ownership Housing Income and Sales Price are affordable to and initially sold to persons whose income is at or below 80% of Area median Income. THIS POLICY APPLIES TO ALL NEW MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS THAT: 1.Include 20 units of more. 2.Require rezoning or a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 3.Receive financial assistance from the City of Edina and/or the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. 4.Are developed on property purchased from the City of Edina even if no financial assistance is being provided by the City unless the waiver is recommended by the Edina HRA and approved by the Edina City Council. THE POLICY 1.New rental multi-family developments subject to this policy shall provide a minimum of 10% residential units at 50% affordable rental rates or 20% residential units at 60% Page | 2 affordable rental rates as defined below. The units shall be occupied by households at or below 60% of the Multi-Family Tax Subsidy Income Limits (MTSP). 2.New for-sale developments shall provide a minimum of 10% of residential units at affordable sales prices as defined below. 3.The affordable unit mix must be approximately proportional to the market rate unit mix. 4.Rental and for-sale/owner occupied affordable units shall provide the following: a.on-site parking (either surface or enclosed) for affordable units and the cost related to parking must be included affordable sales price or affordable rental rate. At least one enclosed parking space shall be included in the purchase price of a for-sale unit in the same manner offered to buyers of market rate units. b.Affordable and market rate residents will have equal access to all entries, lobbies, elevators, parking and amenities. Examples of amenities include storage lockers, balconies, roof decks, outdoor patios, pools, fitness facilities, and similar unit and project features. c.Exterior appearance of affordable units shall be visually comparable with market rate units in the development. 5.New rental housing will remain affordable for a minimum of 20 years if seeking a PUD and zoning amendment without City financing or 30-years if City financing is approved. This requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. 6.New for-sale or owner-occupied developments will remain affordable for a minimum of 30 years and this requirement will be memorialized by a Land Use Restrictive Covenant. The Land Use Restrictive Covenant will contain a provision providing the Housing and Redevelopment Authority or Edina Housing Foundation the right of first refusal to purchase affordable units. 7.The developers and/or owners of multi-family rental housing projects subject to this Policy by receiving financial assistance shall accept tenant-based rental housing assistance including but not limited to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, HOME tenant-based assistance and Housing Support. Tenants with rental assistance may occupy an affordable dwelling unit with the rent charged not exceeding the maximum allowed by Metro HRA or the assistance provider. Furthermore, the rent charged may not exceed the maximum allowed by the most restrictive funding source. This requirement will be enforced through a contract between the City of the project owner pursuant to which the owner will be required to adopt business practices that promote fair housing and provide documentation of compliance with these requirements to the City. This requirement will be further enforced through the City’s monitoring policies and procedures. 8.Owners of City-assisted housing projects shall affirmatively market affordable housing opportunities. All multi-family housing providers subject to this policy must submit an Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plan (AFHMP) at lease every 5 years and a Survey and Certification regarding AFHMP outcomes annually. Owners must advertise housing opportunities on HousingLink or another medium acceptable to the City concurrent with any other public or private advertising. 9.Recognizing that affordable housing is created through a partnership between the City and developers, the City and/or Housing and Redevelopment Authority will consider the following incentives for developments that provide affordable housing: a.Parking requirement reductions b.Tax increment financing for projects that exceed the minimum requirement c.Deferred low interest loans from the Housing and Redevelopment Authority and/or Edina Housing Foundation d.Property Tax Abatement Page | 3 10.It is the strong preference of the City that each new qualifying development provide its proportionate share of affordable housing on site. However, the City recognizes that it may not be economically feasible or practical in all circumstances to do so. As such, the City reserves the right to waive this policy (only if circumstances so dictate, as determined by the City). In lieu of providing affordable housing in each new qualifying development, the City may consider the following: a.Dedication of existing units in Edina to 110% of what would have been provided in a proposed new development. These units would need to be of an equivalent quality within the determination of the City. b.Financial risk and participation in the construction of affordable dwelling units of an equivalent quality by another developer on a different site within the City. c.An alternative proposed by a developer that directly or indirectly provides or enables provision of an equivalent amount of affordable housing within the city. An alternative could be payment of a Total Buy In (TBI) fee, a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units. The TBI shall be equal to $175,000 per unit rounding up to the next whole unit. The TBI would be due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. The City Council may allow the housing developer to pre-pay the TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Opportunity on a case-by-case basis. TBI will be deposited into the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be used for the development and preservation of affordable housing. 11.As allowing maximum density was intended to serve as a density bonus for the inclusion of affordable units, for mixed use developments that have densities 50% or greater of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For residential developments with densities 75% of the maximum allowed density, affordable units must be included in the development. For example: a.If zoning allows between 50-100 units per acre, and the residential development is 50-87 units per acre, the developer/owner may elect to include the affordable units into the development, pay the TBI fee, or an approved alternative. b.If the proposed development is 88-100 units per acre, the development must include affordable units within the building. 12.The owners and their agents of multi-family rental and ownership properties subject to this policy must cooperate with the City’s compliance officer during the affordability period. Non-compliance may be grounds for suspension of the rental license. 13.Guidelines for implementing this Affordable Housing Policy can be found in the Inclusionary Housing Policy Program Guide. 20 22 INCOME AND RENTAL LIMITS Please refer to the income and rent tables published on www.mnhousing.gov. Page | 4 20 22 OWNERSHIP HOUSING INCOME AND SALES PRICE GROSS INCOMES GROSS RENTS 60%50%60%50% 1 Person $49,320 $41,100 Studio $1,233 $1,027 2 Persons $56,340 $46,950 1 Bedroom $1,320 $1,100 3 Persons $63,360 $52,800 2 Bedroom $1,584 $1,320 4 Person $70,380 $58,650 3 Bedroom $1,830 $1,525 5 Persons $76,020 $63,350 4 Bedroom $2,041 $1,701 Acquisition Limit in this policy definition: $355,000 2022 income limits as published on the Metropolitan Council website are as follows: 80% of AMI ($89,400) Income limits and maximum sales prices are updated annually. See www.mnhousing.gov and https://metrocouncil.org/Communities/Services/Livable-Communities-Grants/Ownership-and- Rent-Affordability-Limits.aspx Originally adopted: November 1, 2015 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: April 13, 2016 As amended: February 7, 2018 As amended: April 3, 2018 As amended: October 2, 2018 As amended: March 5, 2019 Income/Rent Limits Adjusted: December 10, 2020 As amended: March 25, 2021 As Amended: December 8, 2022 Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-Affordable Housing Zoning Ordinance Amendment Better Together Edina Project: Affordable Housing - Zoning Ordinance Amendment No Responses VISITORS 1 CONTRIBUTORS 0 RESPONSES 0 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Date: January 25, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:2023 Work P lan Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Attached is the approved 2023 P lanning C ommission Work P lan. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Approved 2023 Work Plan 2023 Work Plan - Including Parking Lot Items Planning Commission Work Plan 2023 - Planning Commission Report Created On: Nov 29, 2022 Plan Number Initiative Type Description Deliverable Council Charge Target Completion Date Leads Budget Required Project 1.1.1 On-going / Annual Land Use Applications Review land use applications, send recommendations to Council on CUP, site plans, and rezoning. Recommendations on land use applications submitted to Council. Charge 3: Review & Recommend Q4 All None required. Project 1.1.2 Project Cahill District Small Area Plan This is continued from 2022. The Planning Commission has established a working group for the small area plan. Recommendation to Council on adopting the District Plan into the comprehensive plan. Charge 3: Review & Recommend Q2 Alkire Study is already included in the City's budget. Project 1.1.3 Project Parking Consideration of future of parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. Planning Commission will be the lead. ETC & EEC will review and comment on final report and recommendation from Planning Commission. Recommendation to Council. EEC & ETC: Review and Comment Charge 3: Review & Recommend Q4 Alkire, Miranda, Strauss None required. Project 1.1.4 Project Development Process Review Review and recommend possible changes to the development process including sketch plans, public feedback, and public hearings. This work plan item is continued over from 2022. Recommendation to City Council.Charge 3: Review & Recommend Q1 Olson, Bennett None required. Project 1.1.5 Project Accessory Dwelling Unit Review and recommend changes to city ordinances regulating Accessory Dwelling Units. This is a project continued from 2022. Recommendation to City Council.Charge 3: Review & Recommend Q1 Smith, Bennett None required. Report Legend No Update Overdue #Priority Page 1 Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Energy and Environment Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) 3 (Review & Recommend) X 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title No Mow May 2.0 Deliverable • Consider if any recommended changes to No Mow May (NMM) are needed, including program expansion to other property types (condos, commercial, etc.) and report -back method for residents. • Establish a communication strategy with support from the City Communication area. • Link NMM promotion with the promotion of rain and pollinator gardens. • Explore ways for residents to add additional "greening" efforts beyond NMM, including soil health Leads Tom Tessman, Hilda Martinez, Suryash Rawat Target Completion Date Q2 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are available for this project, including to purchase and distribute yard signs (600 signs at $6.25 = $3,750), and host workshops with partners on related topics (~$3,250 for two workshops). Might include yard equipment giveaways like electric lawn equipment or a rain barrel as incentive for participation (~$1,000). Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~26 hours (1 hr/week for first half 2023) • Comms: 40-60 hours (stories, video, sign distribution, etc.) • Other staff: 5 hours for Weed Inspector/Parks Dept. Liaison Comments: 1,200 residents participated in NMM 2022, it was a popular program and relieved enforcement pressure on Parks staff during a busy season. Staff is supportive. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) 3 (Review & Recommend) X 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Green Business Deliverable • Strengthen and bring more business to the Green Business Recognition Program. Establish an annual outreach and recruitment calendar including spring communications campaign; present at Chamber, Rotary and other relevant business associations Leads Cory Lukens, Teri Hovanec, Target Completion Date Q4 Template Updated 2021.06.08 Recognition Program • Add bike rack fund participation as part of rubric, as well as one-stop lighting audits, tree preservation. Bayardo Lanzas Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Budget needs to provide materials at presentations, one print media recruitment campaign, business recognition decal purchases (~$2,500) Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~26 hours (30 mins/week to manage Better Together site, coordinate new business recognition, support presentations and advise on promotion campaigns) • Comms: 80 hours (8/story) (Chamber weekly e-ad, storytelling of those we’re recognizing, potential annual mixer support, social media campaign) • Other staff: N/A Liaison Comments: This is an established yet dynamic program. Staff is supportive. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Project Earth Partnership Deliverable • Partner with Project Earth on student-identified sustainability priorities, such as building renewable energy and energy efficiency, bus electrification, native plantings, water use, and cafeteria waste reduction (composting and Styrofoam trays). Leads Ella Machart, Suryash Rawat Target Completion Date Q2 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~10 hours (coordinate connection between Project Earth & EEC, with school district contacts) • Comms: N/A • Other staff: N/A Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive, 10 CAP actions rely on school district support and implementation for completion. City Manager Comments: Move initiative to parking lot . The student perspective and student lead projects are highly valued. A specific initiative is important to ensure the city has authority. Until we know what the project is we don’t know how much staff support is required. Make a mid-year work plan amendment once the project is defined. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) X 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Tree Recognition Campaign Deliverable • “Parade of Trees” tree recognition campaign around Arbor Day • Residents submit photos and locations of special trees. Trees are mapped and residents are invited to do a walking tour to see the trees. Tree photos can be used in social media to raise awareness around Edina’s tree canopy. • EEC may award special tree recognitions: “most climbable tree,” “spookiest,” etc. • Mayor will be invited to recognize beloved trees during Mayor’s Minute Leads Cory Lukens, Teri Hovanec, John Haugen Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) budget needs for tree medallions for tree awards Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~10 hours (works with Comms and GIS staff to organize communication campaign and populate online parade of trees map.) • Comms: 160 hours (Provide campaign design assistance, tree signifier design (e.g. tree medallion) and production, stories/videos on special trees around Edina ) • Other staff: ~10 hours for GIS staff to receive special tree submissions, geocode them and produce walking tour map Liaison Comments: While s taff is supportive, this is the equivalent of one month of staff time for communications – other ways to accomplish this initiative with fewer resources are needed City Manager Comments: No changes. The commission should utilize Better Together Edina for this work plan initiative. Communications will support outreach/advertising. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative Title Commercial Tree Ordinance Deliverable Assess Edina’s Commercial Tree Ordinance by comparing to similar ordinances adopted in relevant cities ; determine if changes should be made. Leads John Haugen, Hilda Martinez, Tom Tessman Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~15 hours (advise EEC at key points, interview colleagues in neighboring cities, gather staff comment as needed) • Comms: N/A • Other staff: ~10 hours for other relevant staff to offer comment (Legal, Forestry, Building Inspect ions, Planning, Parks, Engineering) Liaison Comments: EEC recommended an amendment to Edina’s residential tree ordinance in 2022. Staff is supportive. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge X 1 (Study & Report) 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Time of Sale Energy Disclosure Program Deliverable Review the program currently under implementation in Bloomington and Minneapolis. Analyze local data and evaluate if it is a program that can be implemented in the city of Edina. Leads Hilda Martinez, Stephen Schima, Cory Lukens Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are not needed for this project. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~10 hours (advise EEC at key points, interview colleagues in Bloomington & Minneapolis, gather staff comment as needed) • Comms: N/A • Other staff: Potentially ~5 hours for other relevant staff to offer comment and provide data (Assessing, IT, Inspections, Health) Liaison Comments: Liaison is supportive, given this project’s potential to substantially increase the number of homes on Edina that receive an energy audit annually. A “study and report” phase is needed to identify options, though EEC may be prepared to make a recommendation to Council in 2023 as well. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 1. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q4: Initiative # 7 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Organized Trash Collection Approach Deliverable • Develop a strategic plan for the City of Edina to adequately assess Organized Trash Collection as an alternative to the Open system, with a focus on identifying and answering open questions that Staff, Council, Residents and Commissioners have • work with Staff to collect data on the current state of trash hauling in Edina, and rais e information so that decision-makers are looking at the issue with accuracy, clarity, and comprehensive data points. • Include a work session with Council to discuss early findings. R eceive feedback from ETC. The deliverable is a report and recommendation on how to proceed with OTC. Leads John Haugen, Bayardo Lanzas Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~10 hours (advise EEC, gather staff comment and support data collection) • Comms: N/A • Other staff: ~20 hours from Transportation Planner, City Attorney, Recycling Coordinator Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive, organized trash collection is related to two Climate Actions; this initiative builds on ETC “Study and Report” 2021 initiative. City Manager Comments: Remove initiative. Commission has completed their work. Staff needs direction from Council on moving forward with legal process. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 8 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) X 2 (Review & Comment) 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Other Commission Support Deliverable • Comment on joint initiative between Planning and Transportation Commissions focused on parking. EEC members may join a sub-committee led by PC or ETC on this topic. • Comment on other Commission CAP-related initiatives, as invited. Expected commissions include Planning , Transportation, Human Rights and Relations. Leads Hilda Martinez, Stephen Schima Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~5 hours (coordinate with EEC and other commission staff liaisons to share comment) • Comms: • Other staff: ~3 hours for organizing support from other Commission Staff Liaisons Liaison Comments: Staff liaison expects limited time commitment by the EEC on this topic. Four Climate Actions relate to parking management; Staff supports cross -commission work to recommend implementation pathways for these actions. City Manager Comments: Break initiative into three separate initiatives. See NEW initiative 9 & 10. Change initiative 8 to read, “Review and comment on considerations for future parking initiatives the city should pursue over the next 10-15 years. Planning Commission is lead. ETC and EEC will review and comment.” Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: NEW Initiative # 9 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) X 2 (Review & Comment) 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Climate Action Plan HS 4-3 Deliverable • Review and c omment on HRRC’s CAP-related initiative Leads Hilda Martinez, Stephen Schima Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Liaison Comments: Template Updated 2021.06.08 City Manager Comments: NEW initiative 9. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: NEW Initiative # 10 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) X 2 (Review & Comment) 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title CAP - Greenspace + Trees Strategy GS1 Deliverable • Review and c omment on ETC’s CAP-related initiative Leads Hilda Martinez, Stephen Schima Target Completion Date Q4 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) N/A Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: NEW initiative 10. This initiative would be removed if Council decides to remove work plan initiative #4 from the transportation commission’s work plan. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) 2023 quarterly communications topics: o Reusable and single-use bag awareness campaign (related to 2022 EEC recommendation related to plastic bag management in Edina) o Electric lawncare awareness versus fossil-fueled lawncare equipment (related to No Mow May & CAP actions) Complete Streets Pilot (likely in C ahill district in future years) Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Human Rights and Relations Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Coordinate Sharing Values, Sharing Communities Event. Determine topic at least four months in advance of the scheduled event. Deliverable Plan and host a Sharing Values, Sharing Communities Event in 2023 Leads Bennett, Jain Target Completion Date October 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Yes, funds are available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: In 2021, the HRRC planned and hosted the Stop the Hate event had 60 in-person attendees and had engaged 1,018 people via Facebook. HRRC is currently planning an extension event on October 2, 2022, which the title is How to Stop the Hate. The focus will be providing strategies on how to prevent and combat hate. The HRRC has selected and planned topics that are relevant and timely to the Edina community. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Coordinate Days of Remembrance to be held in alignment with the United States 2023 commemoration date. Potential need for amended resolution if topic is broadened to include additional events of genocide. Deliverable Plan & host a 2023 Days of Remembrance Event with the possibility of amending initial DOR resolution Leads Felton Target Completion Date April 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Yes, funds are available. In previous years, funds are used towards marketing for the event. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: The 2022 Days of Remembrance (DOR) event was held virtually with Eva Moreimi as the guest speaker. The HRRC has been planned and hosted the event for 11 years in various attendance modes such as in-person, hybrid, and virtual. City Manager Comments: If they are going to do a change in resolution, they should do it by March to ensure it is completed before the 2023 event. No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Bias and discrimination event response: • Continue quarterly meetings with Edina Police Department • Review Bias Events Response Plan • Review police community data interactions within Edina Deliverable Continue quarterly meetings, review Bias Events Response Plan and police community data Leads Missaghi, Jain, Ahluwalia, Felton Target Completion Date December 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. In previous years, no funds have been used for these items individually. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: Quarterly meetings with Edina Police Department have been opportunity to strengthen relationship with HRRC and Police Department. Bias Events Response Plan was approved by Council in May 2021. Staff supports review of Bias Events Response Plan and HRRC to determine levels of support and resource the commission can provide as a community response. City Manager Comments: Break initiative into two. Initiative #3 will focus on quarterly meeting with Police. NEW initiative #7 will focus on Bias and Discrimination event response plan. Data collection will start in 2023. This will allow time for the system and process to be set up correctly and determine baseline information. Initiative #3 title to read, “Continue quarterly meetings with the Police Department.” Deliverable will be conducting quarterly meetings with PD. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Tom Oye Award: Coordinate and select one recipient for the 2023 Tom Oye Award Deliverable Planning and awarding of Tom Oye Award Leads Guadarrama, Epstein, Jain Target Completion Date December 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Template Updated 2021.06.08 Liaison Comments: The HRRC has planned and awarded the Tom Oye Award since 2006. The Tom Oye Award recognizes community members who advance human rights and the event award ceremony is held the first City Council meeting in December. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Climate Action Plan HS 4-3: Evaluate community organizations, networks, and connections serving those who require special attention, such as people who are elderly, homebound, isolated, living with disabilities, or those likely to be in need of financial assistance, during or after extreme weather events (e.g., heat, cold, and heavy precipitation). Recommend, if needed, creation of additional community resources or enhancement, leveraging, or support of existing relationships with community organizations, networks, and connections. Deliverable Provide evaluation of community, networks and connections Leads Segall, Ismail, Stringer Moore Target Completion Date December 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: This work plan proposal item originated from the Climate Action Plan. The HRRC would like to evaluate and recommend possibly enhancements of community organizations, networks and connections who serve populations that need additional supports in extreme weather events. City Manager Comment: The first phase of this project is to do the evaluation. Change title to read, “Climate Action Plan HS 4-3: Evaluate community organizations, networks, and connections serving those who require special attention, such as people who are elderly, homebound, isolated, living with disabilities, or those likely to need financial assistance, during or after extreme weather events (e.g., heat, cold, and heavy precipitation). EEC will review and comment on approved report.” Deliverable will be a report to Council. Council charge 1. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 6 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Template Updated 2021.06.08 Provide community perspective and input to the Racial Equity Advancement Team (REAT) on the planning of the Juneteenth event in 2023. Deliverable Provide input to REAT throughout the planning and implementation of 2023 Juneteenth event. Leads Stringer Moore, Jain Target Completion Date June 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: In 2022, the REAT and additional City staff members in partnership with 3 members of the HRRC planned and implemented the City’s first Juneteenth event. The HRRC members have provided community input and immense support in the 2022 Juneteenth event. Planning of Juneteenth event will be led by City staff members with input from HRRC throughout the planning. City Manager Comments: Change title to: “Provide feedback to staff regarding planning of 2023 Juneteenth City event. Debrief after event and provide recommendations for direction of future of events.” The Juneteenth staff committee will solicit community input from the HRRC on planning components of the Juneteenth event. Council charge 2. Change the target completion date to March of 2023. Input will need to be received as event planning is taking place. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: NEW Initiative # 7 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Bias and discrimination event response: • Review Bias Events Response Plan Deliverable Review Bias Events Response Plan &, if needed, provide any recommendations to Council Leads Target Completion Date December 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff): Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: NEW initiative #7 will focus on Bias and Discrimination event response plan. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Ageism: helping community understand, how to mitigate it, educate and assess With a focus on equity, study and report on location and features of, and access to, City facilities (i.e., parks and recreational facilities, community gardens, meeting rooms, and transportation facilities including sidewalks and bicycle facilities) Research and report potential models for Edina residents to review, comment on, and make recommendations for changes to the policies and procedures of local law enforcement. Study & report what other cities are doing to provide reparations Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Community Health Commission DRAFT 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Study and report examples of city-level strategies to communicate public health topics that enhance social connectedness. Deliverable: Report to Council Leads: Q 3 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? None for 2023. Has potential to require significant Communications and Community Engagement hours depending on future recommendations and implementation of programs. Liaison Comments: Restart of previous work plan item with focus on social connectedness. Intention is to create report with examples from across the Country that are existing and could be used as model initiatives. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 1. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Review and recommend actions from 2022 Stop the Bleed report for Council review and potential implementation. Deliverable: Report and recommendation to Council Leads: Greg Wright, Mary Absolon Q1 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Minimal Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive, possible collaboration/coordination between Fire and CHC regarding recommendations. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Appoint Community Health Commission representative and alternate to serve on Opioid Stakeholder group lead by Bloomington Public Health. Deliverable: Nomination Leads: Target Completion Date Q1 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? None Liaison Comments: Necessary for resident/commission presence in decision-making process for opioid settlement funding plan. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Evaluate process for declaring racism as a Public Health Emergency in the City of Edina Deliverable: Report to Council Leads: Tracy Nelson, Philip King -Lowe, Nick Mattison Target Completion Date Q4 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds ava ilable, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Minimal Liaison Comments: Initiative previously discussed as joint initiative between HRRC and CHC. CHC would like to take lead on this initiative and examine models from other jurisdictions that have made similar proclamations. City Manager Comments: Change title to read, “Study and report on the process for declaring racism as a Public Health Emergency in the City of Edina.” Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Multi-Unit Housing Smoke Free policy discussions and recommendations Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Arts and Culture Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Grandview Yard Artwork Deliverable: Review and Recommend on décor elements and programming for 5146 Eden Ave. • As the Grandview site is planned, ACC would participate in community comment and planning of art in the new park space. Leads: Jennifer Faeth Rebecca Sorensen Brian Stemmler Alyssa Fram Nikhil Konkimalla * Target Completion Date Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Community Development has indicated that there are funds available for this project. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: 1-2 hours a month • Comms: Not much ACC assistance needed Other staff: Community Development would keep ACC appraised of site development as project moves forward Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive. The ACC is the established community review body for public art. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: City of Edina Street Art Policy and Practices Deliverable: Research and review programs currently implemented in other cities around the metro. Analyze local data and evaluate how a program can be implemented in the City of Edina. C reate a guide for creative placemaking for street art within Edina. Leads: Brian Stemmler Target Completion Date Sub-Committee Kathy Amlaw Laura Westlund Alyssa Fram Template Updated 2021.06.08 Reeya Anand* Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are not needed for this project. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~1 hours per month • Comms: Possible press release and social media information once report is written if Council is supportive. Initial stages, very lit tle comms needed. • Other staff: Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive. A “study and report” phase is needed to identify options, though ACC may be prepared to make a recommendation to Council in 2023 as well. Perhaps research first and then create a guide could be a secondary in the “parking lot” as a project to do once the research is complete. City Manager Comments: Change initiative to read, “City of Edina Street Art Policy and Practices: Research and review programs currently implemented in other cities around the metro. Analyze local data and evaluate how a program can be implemented in the City of Edina.” Change deliverable to read, “Report for Council.” A guide would be a second phase. Council charge 1. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Adding a Public Art Component to Planning and Public Development Deliverable: Update and revise report created by ACC in 2021 to incorporate City Attorney feedback. ACC will review addition of a public art notification to planning and public development when new land use applications are received. Leads: Alana Zbaren Target Complet ion Date Sub-Committee or Working Group Jennifer Faeth Kathy Amlaw Susan Chandler Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are not needed for this project. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~5 hours per month concurrent with staff work planning Public Art Master Plan • Comms: not much • Other staff: Work with Planning Department on regulations and understanding ordinances Liaison Comments: Staff will create a parallel Public Art Master Plan in 2023. City Manager Comments: Remove this initiative. Commission has completed their work. Staff will review legal feedback and talk about next steps . Progress Q1: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Pursuit of new Art Center space Deliverable: Continue Advocating for a new Art Space and bring the community perspective to the s taff process that will review facility space needs and projects of probable cost scenarios . Leads: Target completion date: ongoing Sub-Committee or Working Group Kathy Amlaw Alana Zbaren Laura Westlund Susan Chandler Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are not needed for this project. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~1-2 hours a month • Comms: If a new Art Center becomes more front and center, community discussion and participation will be paramount. Communications would be brought into assist with that to ensure transparency. • Other staff: Planning, Facilities, other departments who may be affected. Liaison Comments: Staff will be working with HGA and Sara Peterson to prioritize direction and generate options for a new art space. ACC will assist in giving community buy in and perspective. Staff is supportive of ongoing discussion with ACC. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 2. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Utility Boxes Leads: Laura Westlund Template Updated 2021.06.08 Deliverable: Add Art Wraps to City owned Utility Boxes . ACC will jury artwork and chose artists to be represented throughout the City. Sub-Committee or Working Group Susan Johnson Nikhil Konkimalla* Reeya Anand* Target Completion Date Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Funds are available for this project. Staff in multiple departments have indicated interest in promoting art on boxes. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: Staff will do the call for artwork and coordinate installation. ~1-2 hours per month • Comms: Promotion during call for artists and possibly during/after installation to celebrate art in Edina • Other staff: Assistance may be needed for installation Liaison Comments: This will be a project undertaken jointly with City staff and ACC members. City Manager Comments: No changes. The commission should be aware that most utility boxes are owned by third parties and not the city. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative # 6 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Performances on the Plaza and ACC presence at additional City Events Deliverable: Grow ACC presence at Performances on the Plaza, Edina Fall into the Arts Festival, Edina Fourth of July Parade and other events. Promote ACC initiatives and art in Edina. Leads: Rebecca Sorensen Target Completion Date Sub-Committee or Working Group Jenn Faeth Brian Stemmler Susan Johnson Reeya Anand* Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Sweat equity, possible monetary budget required for purchase of give-aways, tent/table setups. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): • Liaison: ~1-2 hours a month • Comms: ~ assist with design of possible promotions, marketing materials, social media posts • Other staff: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Parks & Recreation Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Support initiatives related to Fred Richards and Braemar project implementation if LOST referenda pass. Create task forces or sub- groups to address specific requests for Park Board input (e.g., amenity selection or implementation for the details of the master plans). If unsuccessful, assist with identifying potential funding sources and options. Deliverable Support initiatives via task force or other manner to advance the master plan aspects to ensure the community voice is represented. Leads Fred Richards: Strother, Weaver, Pfuhl Braemar: Good, Spanhake, Williams (S) Target Completion Date Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No budget required. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): PARC would support the work of staff by bring the community perspective to various components of the master plan implementation. Liaison Comments: If the referendum is successful there will be a multitude of touch points with the community and user groups to move from master plan into detail design development. That process would likely include engagement opportunities for the community and have representatives from PARC to assist in those efforts. City Manager Comments: Change initiative to read, “Review and comment on initiatives related to Fred Richards and Braemar project implementation if LOST referenda passes.” Change deliverable to read, “Support initiatives to advance the master plan aspects to ensure the community voice is represented.” If the referendum passes, this will be significant portion of the commission’s work. Council charge 2. (Final wording will be proposed after election results.) Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Report and provide recommendations on alternative funding sources for park related improvements including parks, facilities, and enterprise upgrades. The report will include a philanthropic wish list. Deliverable Report generated and to be used as a foundation for Initiative #3. Leads Pfuhl, Haas, Doscotch Target Completion Date April 2023 Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No budget required. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 10-15 hours Liaison Comments: Baseline information has been completed by staff for PARC discussion and recommendation. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 1. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Investigate and evaluate comparative community Park funding practices and compare to Edina process for park capital improvement project funding. Leverage prior alternative funding initiative work product to develop a recommended plan for future Edina Park project funding in view of current unfunded capital improvement projects. Deliverable Investigate external comparison cities and other best practices for generating a report on recommended practices for Edina. Leads Doscotch (L), Haas, DeFor (S) Target Completion Date Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No budget required. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 20-30 hours of research assistance for PARC data collection Liaison Comments: This type of project was discussed at the City Council CIP meeting as an important set of data for future comparison and discussion. City Manager Comments: More discussion with Council needed. This project addresses internal operations managed by staff. The commission should focus on alternative funding sources in initiative 2. Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☒ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Continuation of 2022 Initiative to present information about Parks and Recreation facilities, services, and systems with up to six community groups. Including staffing needs for the success of programs and any referendum progress if successful. Deliverable Presentation Document with Communications Div. Support and deliver presentation to six community groups Leads Good, Welsh, Haas, Weaver Target Completion Date Deliverable by March, presentations ongoing Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): P&R 10-15; Communications / marketing support? TBD on Town Talk and any related presentation or marketing materials. Liaison Comments: Continuation of a 2022 initiative to utilize in-person and town talk formats. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Review and comment on aspects of future Grandview Yard Park Review and comment on aspects of Fire Station 2. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Planning Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Review Land Use Applications Deliverable: Final Decisions on variances and recommendations to the City Council on CUP, Site Plans and Rezoning Leads: All commissioners Target Completion Date On-going Commission Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No budget required. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. 60-80 staff hours per week (between 3 planners and administrative assistant) Liaison Comments: This is the bulk of the Planning Commission responsibilities; including reviewing the packets (staff reports, plans, studies, and applicant narratives twice per month) City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #2 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Cahill District Area Plan – Continue from 2022 Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council on adopting the District Plan into the Comprehensive Plan Leads Agnew & Alkire Target Completion Date June Working Group Budget Required: (Completed by staff) This study is already included in the City’s budget. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. 10-20 staff hours per week Liaison Comments: Project is going well so far and will be completed in 2023. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Progress Q4: Initiative #3 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Consideration of the future of parking in Edina . This would be a collaborative activity shared among E&E, Transportation and Planning Commissions (1-2 members from each commission). Work product is a recommendation to our various commissions and then ultimately to the City Council about what parking initiatives to pursue over the next 10-15 years, in what order, and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. An example idea to be considered is Parking Benefit Districts. Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council Leads: Alkire Assist: Miranda, Strauss Target Completion Date On-going Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No additional budget required. Potential consulting fees if needed would come from the Community Development Department budget. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. Liaison Comments: This is the continuation of the parking ordinance completed in 2022. City Manager Comments: Change initiative to read: “Consideration of future of parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. Planning Commission will be the lead. ETC & EEC will review and comment on final report and recommendation from Pla nning Commission.” Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #4 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Development Review/Sketch Plan Process follow up. Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council on development process. Lead: Olson Assist: Bennett Target Completion Date March Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. Liaison Comments: This item is currently being worked on as part of the Commission’s 2022 work plan. The Commission should be ready with a recommendation in early 2023. Template Updated 2021.06.08 City Manager Comments: This was a 2022 work plan item that will be completed in 2023. The scope of the project has not changed. To be consistent wit h last year’s work plan, Change initiative to read: “Review and recommend possible changes to the development process including sketch plans, public feedback, and public hearings .” Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #5 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Consider the next “Areas of Potential Change” for future small area planning. Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council. These areas would then be studied further in the next Comprehensive Plan update. Lead: Miranda Assist: Bennett, Padilla Target Completion Date May Sub-Committee or Working Group Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. 10-20 hours? Liaison Comments: This task should not take a lot of time to complete but will be important to set the stage for the next areas to study as part of the 2028 Comprehensive Plan. This task is to simply identify the areas, not study them. City Manager Comments: The city is still completing small area plans tied to the comprehensive plan. This work should start closer to the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Move to parking lot. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #6 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Accessory Dwelling Unit. This would be a follow- up/continuation of the work done in 2022. Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council of an Ordinance Amendment regulating accessory dwelling units. Leads: Smith, Bennett Target Completion Date August Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 5+ hours per week? Template Updated 2021.06.08 Liaison Comments: This task is also on the 2022 Commission work plan. A lot of work and research has gone into this initiative to date. The Commission will be ready to present to the City Council it’s finding in early 2023. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #7 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Consider climate action plan and investigate what can be put in to City Code. (Potentially adding conditions to conditionally permitted uses focusing on sustainability.) Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council regarding an ordinance amendment Leads: Smith, Padilla Target Completion Date December Sub-Committee or Working Group Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. 40+? Liaison Comments: This item is to examine the climate action plan and consider if recommendations could be put into City Code. This would be less of a priority than the above initiatives. City Manager Comments: Due to workloa d, move initiative to the parking lot. Prog ress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Initiative #8 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title: Zoning Ordinance Amendment regarding commercial landscaping Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council regarding an ordinance amendment Leads: Alkire, Olson Target Completion Date December Sub-Committee or Working Group Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Yes. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Liaison Comments: While the existing ordinance has not been updated for a long time; it has not been perceived as a problem during development review of commercial property. Given the length of the proposed work plan, this could be placed in the parking lot. City Manager Comments: Due to workload, move initiative to the parking lot. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Transportation Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative #1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Pedestrian Crossing Policy Review Review existing crossing policy and recommend changes with consideration for local amenities such as parks and schools. Deliverable Report to Council Leads Chris Brown Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-Committee Budget Required (Completed by staff): No funds available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from other staff (Engineering, Parks & Recreation) Liaison Comments: The Pedestrian Crossing Policy, adopted in 2018, provides guidance to ensure the consistent application and treatment of crossings throughout the City. This initiative supports Comprehensive Plan goals to improve safety and mobility. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Initiative #2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Bicycle Network Planning for Bikes as Transportation Develop recommendations to make high-traffic corridors more bike- friendly Deliverable List of recommended improvements and priorities Leads Andy Lewis, Mindy Ahler, Jill Plumb-Smith Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-committee Budget Required (Completed by staff): No funds available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison. Liaison Comments: The 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan provides guidance on bicycle infrastructure within the City. This initiative supports Comprehensive Plan goals to improve multi-modal transportation. Staff recommends the following amendments: Initiative Description: Study existing bicycle infrastructure on high-traffic corridors, recommend improvements and priorities for implementation. Deliverable: Report to staff. City Manager Comments: Change initiative to read, “Develop a priority list of high-traffic corridors and ideas for bike friendly improvements.” Change deliverable to “Report to council.” Council charge 1. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative #3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) France Avenue Transit Corridor Review Review the safety, accessibility, and amenities along the existing France Avenue Transit Corridor for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders between Minnesota Drive and Highway 62 (Southdale District). Investigation will include site visits and review of similar case studies that promote non-automobile transportation modes along similar scale roadways and will include input from key stakeholders. Inquiry is in response to the Climate Action Plan and new parking ordinances. Deliverable Report with recommendations based on Commission review and resident/stakeholder input Leads Tricia Rubenstein, Bruce McCarthy, Lori Richman Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-committee Budget Required (Completed by staff): No funds available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 2-5 hours per month from Staff Liaison, ~10 hours from Communications for stakeholder engagement/website Liaison Comments: A number of guiding documents provide recommendations for improvements on France Avenue, including the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, the Greater Southdale District Plan and Design Experience Guidelines. The City is limited in its capacity to advance improvements on this corridor because it is a Hennepin County road. Staff recommends the following amendments: Deliverable: Report to staff Council Charge: Study & Report City Manager Comments: This work plan item requires more discussion with Council regarding role of the City. Initiative #4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Boulevard Tree Planting Recommend replacement and new boulevard tree planting in top priority areas identified by the Climate Action Plan (Greenspace + Trees Strategy GS1) with guidance from the City Forester. Deliverable Recommendation based on Commission review Leads Tricia Rubenstein Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) No funds available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from City Forester. Liaison Comments: This initiative builds on work completed by the Commission in 2022. The City does not actively plan boulevard trees because boulevards are privately maintained. Staff recommends the following amendments: Deliverable: Report to staff. Council Charge: Study & Report. City Manager Comments: This work plan item requires more discussion with Council regarding role of the City and funding. Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative #5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Organized Trash Collection Review and comment on the Energy & Environment Commission’s initiative to develop a strategic plan for the City to adequately assess organized trash collection as an alternative to the open system. Deliverable Review and comment on EEC report/recommendations Leads Jill Plumb-Smith Target Completion Date Q4 Cross-Commission Committee (EEC) Budget Required (Completed by staff): No funds available. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Liaison Comments: This initiative builds on work completed by the Commission in 2021. This initiative supports Comprehensive Plan goals to minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and Climate Action Plan goals to reduce carbon emissions and vehicle miles traveled. City Manager Comments: Remove initiative. Commission has completed their work. Staff needs direction from Council on moving forward with legal process. Initiative #6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Off-Street Parking Participate in cross-commission committee with Planning and Energy & Environment Commissions to recommend what parking initiatives the City should pursue over the next 10-15 years. Engage in consulting support via Planning Commission funds. Recommend a bike rack addition strategy to accelerate bike parking installation. Deliverable Recommendation to City Council Leads Kirk Johnson, Janet Kitui Target Completion Date Q4 Cross-Commission Committee (PC lead, EEC) Budget Required (Completed by staff): Potential consulting fees would come from the Community Development Department budget, if needed. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): 2-5 hours per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from other staff (Planning, Engineering) Liaison Comments: This initiative supports Comprehensive Plan goals to manage parking provision and reduce dependence on single-occupancy vehicles. City Manager Comments: Change initiative to read: “Review and comment on considerations for future parking initiatives the city should pursue over the next 10-15 years. Planning Commission is lead. ETC will review and comment on the final recommendation from Planning Commission.” Council charge 3. NEW Initiative #7 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Cahill Small Area Plan Appoint one commission member to serve on the Cahill small area plan working group. Deliverable Participate on the working group for the remainder of the project. Leads Target Completion Date Q4 Working group Template Updated 2021.06.08 Budget Required (Completed by staff): Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: This work plan item is recommended to be added since the project has secured grant funding with a transportation priority. Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Transit service advocacy, pedestrian safety education, speed limit adherence Template Updated 2021.06.08 Commission: Heritage Preservation Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Proposal - DRAFT Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Review Certificates of Appropriateness applications Deliverable COAs Leads N/A Target Completion Date Ongoing All Commission Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. No additional funds required. Preservation Consultant funding comes from the Planning Department budget. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Pre -Application meeting with staff liaison and application review time/report from Staff Liaison, Consultant Vogel and Building Official Fisher if necessary. Staff time is dependent on how many applications/preapplication meeting requests are received. Liaison Comments: Processing COAs is an ongoing item. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council Charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Recruit nominees and award and promote the 2023 Heritage Preservation Award during Preservation Month in May Deliverable Award the 2023 Heritage Award Leads Nymo & Pollock Target Completion Date May Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. No additional funds required. Money for plaque comes from the Planning budget. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Public outreach: make the online nomination form live on the website, press release, social media posts. Article on winner after award is given. Liaison Comments: The HPC will continue to award the Heritage Preservation Award during Preservation Month. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☐ Project ☒ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Based on owner interest, nominate eligible properties as Edina Heritage Landmarks and add additional properties to the eligible property list. Deliverable • Add to eligible property list • Designate additional Edina Heritage Landmark properties Leads N/A Target Completion Date Ongoing All Commission Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. No additional funds required. Consultant fees come from Planning Department budget. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Public Outreach/Social Media posts if additional properties are designated as Edina Heritage Landmarks. Creation of new webpage if new landmark property is designated. Liaison Comments: This item is ongoing and continues based on owner interest. City Manager Comments: No changes. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Create a decision tree schematic explaining what work in the Country Club District triggers a COA for use educating the HPC and homeowners. Deliverable Decision tree schematic explaining process. Visual can be used in public education. Leads Schilling, Lonnquist and Kmetz -Sheehy Target Completion Date By end of 2023 Sub-Committee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Graphic design to help with decision tree schematic design and add it to the city’s website. Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive of this initiative. This is a tool that can be used as staff and the public on when a COA is required for a project and when it is not. City Manager Comments: Swap initiative #4 and #5 to identify the order of work. The commission will need to complete the review of potential code changes, changes to the Plan of Treatment and potential escrow fee before they create the decision tree schematic. Council charge 4. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Review and comment on potential code changes, changes to the country club plan of treatment and potential escrow fee. Deliverable Comments on code drafts, plan of treatment changes and potential escrow fee Leads N/A Target Completion Date By end of 2023 All Commission Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. No additional funding required. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Planning staff will draft code and potential plan of treatment changes. Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive of this initiat iv e. Staff is currently working on drafts of each item. City Manager Comments: See comments under proposed initiative #4. Commission should use a sub-committee for this work and identify leads. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Template Updated 2021.06.08 Initiative # 6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Initiative Title Prepare all elements needed for a successful Century Homes program to launch in January 2024, in collaboration with the Edina Historical Society. Deliverable Text and design for web page, plaque, application materials, community outreach flyer, and project management guidelines. Create associated budget. Leads Hassenstab, Lonnquist, Maheshwari Target Completion Date By end of 2023 Subcommittee Budget Required: (Completed by staff) Are there funds available for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. There are not funds available for this project. Funds would be required for a Century Home project launch in 2024. Staff Support Required (Completed by staff): How many hours of support by the staff liaison? Communications / marketing support? Graphic Design/Communications support- webpage, social media, flyer Liaison Comments: Staff is supportive of this initiative. This is the second work plan item around Century Homes City Manager Comments: No changes, however, note initiative #5 should be completed before this initiative. Council charge 3. Progress Q1: Progress Q2: Progress Q3: Progress Q4: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) -2022 archeology work plan items Added to the parking lot by staff. This item was discussed but ultimately removed by the HPC. - Utilize the city’s existing list of contributing and non-contributing resources in the Country Club District as an education tool. -Improve decision-making using a review of homes in the Country Club District built during 1924-1944 that are no longer contributing heritage resources due to excessive or inappropriate changes.