Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2023-04-26 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Packet
Ag enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota City H all Council Chambers Wednesday, Apr il 26, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. How to Participate in Public Hearings: Call 786-496-5601 E nter Confer ence Pin 1141809# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to g et in the queue to speak An operator will intr oduce you when it is your turn I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Draft Minutes of Regu la r Meetin gs on Ma rch 29, 2023 a n d April 12, 2023 V.Special Recogn ition s An d Presentation s A.Com m ission Mem ber Review VI.Com m u n ity Com m ent During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Pu b lic Hea rings A.Ordin ance No. 2023-06: E V-Sola r Zonin g Cod e Am endm en t B.B-23-06 6805 Pa iute Dr . Reta inin g w all setba ck va ria n ce request VIII.Rep orts/Recom m en d ation s A.Sketch Plan Review - 5100 Eden Avenue IX.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents X.Sta7 Com m ents XI.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli9cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: April 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes of R egular Meetings on Marc h 29, 2023 and April 12, 2023 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the draft minutes from March 29, 2023 and April 12, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2023-03-29 DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes 2023-04-12 DRAFT Planning Commission Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers March 29, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Olson, Felt, Hu, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Gandhi. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Chair Bennett offered a change to the agenda, moving Item B to Item C to allow the sketch plan review to happen before the Development Review Process. Commissioner Bennett moved to approve the March 29, 2023, agenda with the mentioned change. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, March 15, 2023 Commissioner Padilla moved to approve the March 15, 2023, meeting minutes. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment None. VI. Public Hearings A. Rezoning – 4404 Valley View Road Director Teague presented the request of 4404 Valley View Road for a rezoning. Staff recommended approval of the rezoning, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Rebecca Remick, Owner of City Homes, addressed the Commission and answered questions. Public Hearing Ms. Janie Weston, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Commission and indicated she was not in favor of the PUD request. Mr. Steve Brown, 5528 Halifax Lane, addressed the Commission and indicated he was not in favor of this application. Ms. Connie Carrino, 4509 Garrison Lane, addressed the Commission and indicated she supported thoughtful redevelopment and vision, but she did not support this project. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the rezoning proposal and asked staff additional questions. Motion Commissioner Daye moved that the Planning Commission recommend denial to the City Council of the Rezoning at 4404 Valley View Road with the following findings: the use conforms to the existing zoning of Planned Commercial District; and the use conforms to the Comprehensive Plan for the approved project; additionally recommended the city council approve the subdivision request. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Resolution B-23-04: Findings Regarding the Proposed 72nd & France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Economic Development Manager Neuendorf presented the Findings Regarding the Proposed 72nd & France 2 Tax Increment Financing District. Staff recommended approval of the resolution as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Motion Commissioner Strauss moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the Resolution as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. The Commission further discussed this item before voting on the motion. Motion carried 8 ayes, 1 nay (Miranda). Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 3 of 3 B. Sketch Plan Review – Phase 2 Hotel, 7200 France Avenue Director Teague presented the request of a sketch plan review for Phase 2 Hotel at 7200 France Avenue. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Ted Carlson, Orion Investments, 6550 York Avenue, Mr. Nate Enger, Mr. Terry Gruenhagen, ESG Architects, and Mr. Drew Stafford addressed the Commission. The Commission asked questions of the applicant. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered the following comments: Use seems appropriate. Likes the height and setback of the building Feels very suburban and car oriented. Like to see a smaller layout with the building wrapping around The event center might complicate parking. Trade off with multi-family loses the affordability factor for the City. Project is something that could ignite excitement in the area. Allows people to come and gather at a restaurant and event center. C. Development Review Process Chair Bennett presented the development review process with the Commission. The Commission discussed the development review process and supported the changes. The Commission believes the public hearing should be held at the Planning Commission level. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Received IX. Staff Comments Received. X. Adjournment Commissioner Padilla moved to adjourn the March 29, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:10 PM. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 12, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Olson, Hu, Gandhi, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planner, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, and Felt. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Strauss moved to approve the April 12, 2023, agenda. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Community Comment None. V. Public Hearings A. Monument Sign Setback Variance – 6500 Barrie Road Assistant City Planner Bodeker presented the request of 6500 Barrie Road for a Monument Sign Setback Variance. Staff recommends approval of the Monument Sign Setback Variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Rodney Hintz, MSP Commercial, introduced himself and addressed the Commission. The Commission asked Mr. Hintz questions about the setback variance. Public Hearing Ms. Linda Schmitz, 6483 Barrie Road, asked the Commission questions regarding the sign direction. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Commissioner Olson moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission further discussed this application asking staff questions. Motion Commissioner Padilla moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Monument Sign Setback Variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 7235 France Avenue Director Teague presented the request of 7235 France Avenue for a Sketch Plan Review. Staff recommended the Commission review the sketch plans and give feedback on the proposal. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Patrick Brama, Enclave Companies and Mr. Nate Enger, ESG, addressed the Commission and answered questions. Riley Smith, Enclave Companies was also at the meeting. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered the following comments: Intersection design to the pedestrian plaza could be improved. There could be a real opportunity for something to happen at that intersection to connect it to the Three Rivers Park. The project has captured the intentions and features of the design guidelines. Would like to see if a pedestrian bridge could be constructed to go over France Avenue. Opportunity to combine parking amongst the buildings. Building height is not ideal. Would like to see more creativity in the shape of the building. More robust park feature. Separation from the residential area. The site should offer up something spectacular. Would like to see more emphasis put along the barrier of the development. VII. Chair and Member Comments Received. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 3 of 3 VIII. Staff Comments Received. IX. Adjournment Commissioner Olson moved to adjourn the April 12, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:07 PM. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: April 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:MJ Lamon, C ommunity Engagement Manager Item Activity: Subject:C ommis s ion Member R eview Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: F or information only. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Board and Commission Member Review Board and Commission Member Handbook 1 Board & Commission Member Review Updated 2023.03.28 Agenda Review •Roles •Advisory Groups Work Plan Development •Citywide work plans •Calendar •Roles •Subgroups Ethics •Gifts •Conflict of Interest •Code of Ethics Council StaffCommissions Decide Strategy Advise Council Community Perspective Manage operations, Implement Policy, Advise Council Technical Analysis Council •Make policy-level decisions •Hire & supervise City Manager •Approve -Budget and related work plan -Ordinances and policy decisions -Development proposals -Variances and rezoning requests •Appoint advisory boards and commissions Staff •Provide best efforts and technical advice to Council •Manage operations and staff •Propose budget and policies •Carry out Council decisions •Deliver services •Equitable enforce codes and policies Advisory Boards, Commission & Task Forces •Provide community perspective on values and needs •Propose work plan items •Advise the council through work plan charges •Hold hearings as directed by Council •Assist as directed in work plan with engagement efforts Roles 4 Elected Officials Fundamentals: ▪Make Community Decisions ▪Determine Community Direction ▪Free and Fair Elections ▪Rep resen tative Democracy;Le ad an d Follow ▪Law Making –Set Policy ▪Oversight –Enforce Policy 5 Staff Liaisons Fundamentals: ▪Provide technical expertise to Council & commissions ▪Communicate commission work to City Council ▪Manage commission records Advisory Boards & Commissions Fundamentals: ▪Advisory to the Council ▪Community Perspective ▪Additional Community Voice and Context ▪Share the Load ▪Buffer for Council ▪Training Ground for Future Leaders Levels of Engagement Increasing Impact on the Decision Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Empower SHARE COLLECT BRING TOGETHER Board & Commissions Task Forces Website Open House Public Hearing Workshop Survey Focus Groups Public Meetings Publications City Extra Correspondence Stakeholder Interviews Fact Sheets Comment FormsFairs/Events Tours & Field Trips 9 8 Legitimacy & Accountability Boards, Commissions & City Staff Legitimacy from the City Council Accountable to the City Council 9 We will not always agree…Council City StaffBoards & Commissions Decide Technical Analysis Community Perspective Provide Council with the best information possible during the decision making process. Rights & Responsibilities 10 Rights •You are a resident •Ability to engage on topics of interest •Speak as a resident at public hearings or community comment regarding topics not related to commission work Responsibilities •You are a board or commission member •Represent the decision of the board/commission •Use board/commission communication channels to provide feedback regarding topics related to work 11 Commission Subcommittee Working Group Task Force Tenure Ongoing Temporary Temporary Temporary Members Residents Commission members only Commission + Public members As defined Scope Work Plan Work Plan Item Work Plan Item Task Force Charge OML Required Not required Not required Not required Staff Support Yes No Not typically Yes Reports To Council Commission Commission Council or City Manager Work Plans 12 14 Budget Pillars / City Values Stewardship •We make wise investments that focus on the best long-term value for residents. Equity •We provide equitable opportunities for people to participate in their City government and access City institutions, facilities, and services. Health •We use a Health - in-All Policies approach to promote and protect the physical, mental and social wellbeing of all people who live, work or visit Edina. Sustainability •We ensure that our policies, decisions, and plans have a positive impact on people and the planet now and for future generations. Values Viewfinder 17 Commission Up WWW.EDINAMN.GOV 18 Council Staff Commission Work Plan Calendar January Work plans begin June–Aug. Develop proposed work plan September Approved work plans due October Chair presents work plans to City Council November Staff presents work plan to City Council December Work plans approved by City Council 15 Work Plan Development Roles WWW.EDINAMN.GOV 20 Commission Chair •Lead work plan development •Make sure work plan is not overloaded •Ensure there is a “lead(s)” to each initiative •Present proposed work plan to City Council Staff Liaison •Provide technical expertise, recommendations and advice to the commission •Provide clear recommendations to City Management and/or Council to consider •Ensure work plan template fields are completed 16 21 Charge 1: Study & Report Study a specific issue or event and report its findings to the Council No vote No recommendation Charge 2: Review & Comment Review specific policy issue and staff will seek comments from each individual member of the group to pass on to Council No vote No recommendation Charge 3: Review & Recommend Review a specific policy issue and provide a recommendation on the issue to Council Majority vote required Recommendation Charge 4: Review & Decide Study, review and decide on an issue. The decision will be the City’s official position on the matter unless it is formally reversed by Council Majority vote required Decide Work Plan vs Non-Work Plan Items 22 Work Plan Items •Approved by City Council •Focus work •Alignment with overall work of the council •Dedicated resources •Delegation of some authority and staff time Non-Work Plan Items •Items not approved by City Council, including items located in the “parking lot” •No dedicated resources •Can ask Council for work plan modification through advisory communication (rare) 18 Ethics 23 Conflict of Interest 24 DEFINITION Any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any BC action or if there is potential for the appearance of conflict of interest WHAT SHOULD YOU DO Disclose the conflict or interest to the group Abstain from discussing or voting on the matter 26 Gifts 25 DEFINITION Any invite or item of value from an “interested party” in conjunction with your board and commission work WHAT SHOULD YOU DO Abstain from taking the gift Contact your staff liaison EXAMPLE Code of Ethics WWW.EDINAMN.GOV 26 •I have been entrusted by the Edina City Council to perform my duties and services as a volunteer Board or Commission Member i n manner that is always in the best interests of the community of Edina. •While honest differences of opinion may develop, I will work harmoniously with other Board or Commission members to assure residents the services they require. •I will invite all residents to express their opinions so I may be properly informed prior to making my decisions. I will make them based solely upon the facts available to me. I will support the final decision of the Board. •I must devote the time, study and thought necessary to carry out my duties. •I understand that the Board or Commission members recommend policies, the City Council establishes policies and the staff is responsible for administering the policies of the City Council. •I understand that as a Board or Commission Member, I have no authority outside of the proper meeting of the Board. •I understand that all Board meetings shall be open to the public, except as provided by law. •I understand that it is my duty as a Board or Commission member to treat all residents, staff and fellow Board and Commission members in a respectful and professional manner at all times. •I will withdraw from discussions and decision-making actions in cases where I have a conflict of interest and I will disclose those conflicts of interest when they arise. WWW.EDINAMN.GOV 27 Questions? MEMBERHANDBOOK City of Edina Boards & Commissions Board/Commission Member Handbook 1 | Page CONTENTS UPDATED 2023.02.28 Inside the City ............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 City Authority ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Council, Staff, & Commission Roles ......................................................................................................... 4 City Council ................................................................................................................................................... 5 City Leadership .............................................................................................................................................. 5 City Organizational Structure .................................................................................................................... 6 Department Functions ................................................................................................................................. 6 Council, Staff, Commission Roles ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Staff Liaisons ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Edina’s Advisory Boards and Commissions ............................................................................................ 8 Roles ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Commission Structure ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 Membership and Onboarding................................................................................................................... 10 Membership .................................................................................................................................................. 10 Guidelines: .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Types of Members ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Key Players ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Committees and Working Groups ......................................................................................................... 11 Committee / Working Group Membership & Guidelines ................................................................ 12 Membership .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Guidelines: .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Membership .................................................................................................................................................. 12 Guidelines: .................................................................................................................................................... 12 Key Components of Working Groups .................................................................................................. 13 Sub-groups and Chair Assignments ........................................................................................................ 13 Disbanding..................................................................................................................................................... 14 Guiding Documents .................................................................................................................................... 14 Member Handbook..................................................................................................................................... 14 Work Plans ................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Work Plan Process ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Annual Work Plan Calendar .................................................................................................................... 15 Work Plan Development .......................................................................................................................... 15 Board/Commission Member Handbook 2 | Page Roles ............................................................................................................................................................... 16 Council Charges .......................................................................................................................................... 16 Work Plan vs Non-Work Plan Items ..................................................................................................... 18 Meetings ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Types of Meetings ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Regular Meetings ......................................................................................................................................... 18 Special Meetings........................................................................................................................................... 18 Joint Work Session Meeting ..................................................................................................................... 18 Attendance ................................................................................................................................................... 19 Quorum and Voting ................................................................................................................................... 20 Meeting Packet ............................................................................................................................................. 20 Agenda ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 Minutes .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Robert’s Rules of Order............................................................................................................................ 21 Communication ......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Open Meeting Law...................................................................................................................................... 22 Communication with City Council ......................................................................................................... 23 Communication with the Public .............................................................................................................. 24 Ethical and Respectful Conduct ............................................................................................................................................. 26 Conflict of Interest ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Gifts ................................................................................................................................................................ 27 Respectful Behavior .................................................................................................................................... 27 Code of Ethics ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Novus Boardview ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Board/Commission Member Handbook 3 | Page INSIDE THE CITY City Authority Cities are created under state statute and subservient to state and federal law. The state of Minnesota has two “types” of cities and many “forms” of cities. The two types of cities are Home-Rule Charter (HRC) and Statutory City (SC). Edina is a Plan B Statutory City. STATUTORY CITY POWERS • Create departments, advisory boards, and appoint employees to conduct City affairs • Make annual tax level and exercise authority over finances • Provide parks and recreation facilities • Prosecute people who violate ordinances • Plan for future development of the City • Levy special assessments for public improvements • Carry out a program of housing redevelopment • Control the subdivision of land CITY COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES • Council holds legislative authority • City Council consists of the Mayor and four Council members • Council sets policy • Each council members have an equal vote • City council hires, fires, and supervises only one city employee: City Manager • City Council holds City Manager accountable CITY MANAGER RESPONSIBILITIES • City Manager holds administrative and management authority • City Manager is accountable to the City Council • City Manager hires staff and carriers out city operations Home-Rule Charter (HRC) As defined by charter Statutory City (SC) Standard Plan A Plan B Board/Commission Member Handbook 4 | Page Council, Staff, & Commission Roles Objectives of Boards and Commissions: • City Council establishes Boards and Commissions to engage residents into city work. • City Staff supports Boards and Commissions to assist with effective governance. • Board and Commission members serve the community and can participate in meaningful work. Supporting City Council: Edina’s Boards and Commissions are established by the City Council and serve as advisors to the council. Boards and Commissions and City Staff are accountable to City Council. Council • Make policy-level decisions • Hire & supervise City Manager • Appoint advisory boards and commissions • Approve - Budget and related work plan - Ordinances and policy decisions - Development proposals - Variances and rezoning requests Staff • Provide best efforts and technical advice to Council • Manage operations and staff • Propose budget and policies • Carry out Council decisions • Deliver services • Equitable enforce codes and policies Advisory Boards, Commission & Task Forces • Provide community perspective on values and needs • Propose work plan items • Advise the council through work plan charges • Hold hearings as directed by Council • Assist as directed in work plan with engagement efforts Board/Commission Member Handbook 5 | Page City Council Mayor James Hovland James Pierce Carolyn Jackson Kate Agnew Julie Risser Fundamentals of elected officials • Make Community Decisions • Determine Community Direction • Free and Fair Elections • Representative Democracy: Lead and Follow • Law Making – Set Policy • Oversight – Enforce Policy Authority of City Council • City Council is a continuing body, past actions remain in effect. • Authority is through Council as a whole, and not as individual members. • Mayor and Council Members generally have the same authority. • Mayor presides over meetings and has some additional ceremonial and ministerial functions. • Communication from Council to staff flows through City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and Department Directors. Legitimacy & Accountability City Leadership Scott Neal City Manager • Responsible for hiring and managing City staff • City Manager carries out policy direction of Council Lisa Schaefer Assistant City Manager Boards, Commissions & City Staff Legitimacy from the City Council Accountable to the City Council Board/Commission Member Handbook 6 | Page City Organizational Structure Department Functions Human Resources • Recruitment and selection • Compensation and benefits • Employee and labor relations • Employment policies • Performance management • Training and development • Safety and worker’s compensation • General liability and risk management • Payroll Communications • Media and publications • Marketing • Website and social media Finance • Budget • Investments • Accounts payable Public Works • Street maintenance • Utility Operations • Fleet Maintenance Engineering • Design • Project management • Environmental services • Transportation • Sustainability strategy & measurements • Property management • HVAC • Electrical Parks and Recreation • Recreation programs • Manage enterprise facilities • Liquor Store Operations • Parks maintenance City ManagerCommunications Director Community Development Director Engineering Director Fire Chief Parks & Recreation Director Police Chief Public Works Director Assistant City ManagerFinance Director HR Director IT Director Admin Department Community Engagement Manager Race & Equity Manager City Clerk Executive Assistant Management Fellow Board/Commission Member Handbook 7 | Page • Accounts receivable Police • Patrol • Investigations • Dispatch • Records • Community Health Fire • Fire suppression and prevention • Emergency medical • Emergency preparedness • Building plan review • Building permits • Building inspections I.T. • Network management • Telecommunications • End-user support and training • GIS Community Development • Planning • Zoning • Heritage preservation • Sign permits • Residential & commercial appraisal • Economic Development Administration • Council relations • Boards and Commissions • Strategic Planning • Neighborhood Associations • Elections • Records Management & Licenses • Performance measurement NOT INCLUDED IN CITY SERVICES Area Governance School Edina, Hopkins and Richfield School Districts Some Arterial Roads Hennepin County Highways MNDOT Libraries Hennepin County Social Services Hennepin County Courts Hennepin County Correctional System Hennepin County and State of Minnesota Waste Water Treatment Metropolitan Council MSP Airport Metropolitan Airport Commission Creeks and Some Waterways Watershed Districts Board/Commission Member Handbook 8 | Page COUNCIL, STAFF, COMMISSION ROLES Staff Liaisons Laura Fulton Arts & Culture Commission Cary Teague Planning Commission Perry Vetter Parks & Recreation Commission Andrew Scipioni Transportation Commission Shelagh Stoerzinger Board of Appeals & Equalization Emily Bodeker Heritage Preservation Commission Dave Fisher Construction Board of Appeals Grace Hancock Energy & Environment Commission Jeff Brown Community Health Commission Heidi Lee Human Rights & Relations Commission Fundamentals of Staff Liaisons Provide technical expertise to Council & commissions Communicate commission work to City Council Manage commission records Edina’s Advisory Boards and Commissions Arts & Culture Commission Community Health Commission Energy & Environment Commission Heritage Preservation Commission Human Rights & Relations Commission Board of Appeals & Equalization Construction Board of Appeals Planning Commission Parks & Recreation Commission Transportation Commission Fundamentals of Advisory Boards and Commissions Advisory to Council Special expertise Additional community voice and context Share the load Buffer for Council Board/Commission Member Handbook 9 | Page Training ground for future leaders Roles The city uses the International Association for Public Participation’s spectrum to structure engagement and determine the level of influence the public can have on decisions. One technique of engagement is utilizing Boards and Commissions. Boards and Commissions have a higher impact on decisions and therefore are located on the spectrum under “collaborate”. City code identifies advisory board and commission roles. COMMISSION ROLE Investigate matters within scope of the commission or as specifically directed by Council Advise the council by communicating the viewpoint or advice of the entire commission At the direction of council, hold hearings, receive evidence, conduct investigations, make decisions, and provide recommendations to Council NOT COMMISSION’S ROLE Commissions do not direct the work of city staff Do not take responsibility for financial performance of any city facility or program Board/Commission Member Handbook 10 | Page COMMISSION STRUCTURE Membership and Onboarding Types of Members There are two types of board and commission members: November Member assessment December Reappointments Application Opens Recruitment January Application Closes Interview Start February Interviews Completed Appointments Orientation March Terms start March 1 First meeting for new members BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Membership • Members are selected by City Council. • Membership consists of regular and student members. • All appointments have term limits. • Subject to Open Meeting Law • The City Manager appoints a staff liaison who provides administrative support to the board/commission as a body. Guidelines: • Boards and commissions are established to advise the City Council • Establishment and missions are outlined in City code • Boards and commissions are on-going • Meetings of boards and commissions are public meetings • Commissions can establish committees and working groups Regular Members Must be 18 years of age or older Must live in Edina Voting member Terms are typically 3 years in duration Student Members Full time sophmore, junior or senior Lives in Edina or open enrolled at Edina High School Non voting member Serve a one year term Board/Commission Member Handbook 11 | Page Key Players Committees and Working Groups Local governments often use a variety of resident advisory groups, including Boards and Commissions, to complete the mission of the City. Commissions may create Committees and Working Groups to assist them with their work plan, however, committees and working groups work at the direction of the whole board and commission. Role of these groups: • Study issues in greater depth and report findings • Assist with community initiatives or events Chair •Provide input on agenda •Lead meetings & facilitate discussion •Facilitate development, completion, and progress updates for work plan •Encourage member participation •Manage areas of conflict Vice Chair •Support chair •Perform chair duties when chair is not available Liaison •Prepare agenda & meeting materials •Provide official notice of meetings •Record & prepare minutes •Maintain official records •Provide technical expertise & access to city staff/resources •Relay information to council Composition Temporary On-going Board/Commission Sub-Committee Commission Members Only Working Group Commission Members Public Members Board/Commission Member Handbook 12 | Page Committee / Working Group Membership & Guidelines COMMITTEES Membership • The commission selects at least two, but less than a quorum of members • All members must be members of the commission • The commission selects a chair or co-chairs • Not subject to Open Meeting Law Guidelines: • Committees are established with the approval of the commission to assist with a work plan initiative • The commission has final recommendations on all matters which the committee has been given guidance • Staff does not provide support to committees • Meetings of Committees are not public meetings WORKING GROUPS Membership • A Working Group is comprised of one or more members of the Board/Commission, but less than a quorum of members and includes members of the public. • Commission selects the chair or co-chairs • The chair will recommend to the commission other working group members who are outside of the Board/Commission. The board/commission appoints additional working group members. • Not subject to Open Meeting Law Guidelines: • Established with the approval of the commission • Created when work requires more support • Set timeline • Notice is given to the public of the formation of the working group providing a minimum of 14 days for the public to express interest before members are selected • Commission has final recommendations on all matters of the working group • Staff liaison does not support working groups • Meetings of working groups are not legally required to be public Boards and commissions should consider creating a working group when: • The board or commission members need more support. • The work requires a specific expertise or time. • The work needs more community engagement to identify issues and concerns Board/Commission Member Handbook 13 | Page Key Components of Working Groups Establishment • Prior to the establishment of a working group, the commission should complete a “greenprint” which is a template for determining the need of the working group • The “greenprint” should be approved by the commission at a regular scheduled meeting Public Notice • The commission must put out notice of the establishment of the working group (i.e. press release, city communication channels) • Notice should be given a minimum of 14 days so interested individuals can come forward to volunteer Leadership • The chair or co-chair positions should be held by voting commission members • The commission appoints the chair or co-chairs Size • Working groups should not exceed 7 members (5 is preferable) Time • Working groups are established for a set time in order to complete a task set forth by the commission Disbanding • The commission can disband a working group at any regular meeting by a majority vote • In the case that no member of the commission is available to serve, the working group will be automatically disbanded Work • Working groups do not provide direction to the commission • The commission has final recommendation on all matters Sub-groups and Chair Assignments Appointments: Committees and working groups work at the discretion of the entire commission so therefore the commission makes the appointments of all members. Resignation or Removal: Committee and working group members may voluntarily resign by notifying the chair of the group. A committee or working group member may be removed by a majority vote of the commission. Chair Assignments: Every committee and working group should have regular member(s) serving as the chair or co- chairs. The commission approves the selection of chairs. Chair Duties: • Set the meeting schedule • Prepare meeting agenda • Maintain meeting decorum • Recommend members (working group) and notify commission of changes in membership • Report on the group’s activities to the regular commission meetings • Ensure the group is working as directed by the commission Board/Commission Member Handbook 14 | Page • Communicate to the Committee or Working Group any directives, questions or input from the commission Disbanding Committees and working groups are not intended to be ongoing. These groups can be disbanded by a majority vote of the commission or they will automatically disband in the following instances: • Completion of work / charge • No member of the commission is available to serve Guiding Documents 1 City Code • Outlines general roles of boards and commissions • Identifies each board or commissions mission • If there is discrepancy between city code and other guiding documents, city code prevails 2 Work Plan • Work approved and directed to the commission by Council 3 Member Handbook • The guide you are reading right now! WORK PLANS Work Plan Process Board/Commission Member Handbook 15 | Page Annual Work Plan Calendar Annual work plans ensure that the Commissions’ initiatives are aligned with the City Council’s priorities. Work Plan Development Work plans are developed by the commission. During the process the staff liaison will provide input and technical expertise. Once proposed work plans are presented to Council, staff will conduct a review and provide recommendations prior to Council approval. January Work plans begin June–Aug. Develop proposed work plan September Approved work plans due November Staff presents work plans to City Council October Chair presents work plan to City Council December Work plans approved by City Council Council Staff Commission June Brainstorm Collect Ideas What do you want to work on? July Review list of ideas Reduce list How much capacity do you have? August Determine the priorities Who is leading the project? September Approved proposed work plan Board/Commission Member Handbook 16 | Page Roles Council Charges The Council Charge is a guide for Council to provide clear and specific direction to Boards and Commissions on. Council Charge is given in instances when Council tasks a board or commission with an initiative. City staff ensures Council identifies the charge level of the task. The Council Charge concept is implemented in Board and Commission work plans. Examples: - Council needs more information - Review a policy or recommendations from another commission or staff project - Council is ready to act on an item and implement changes - Events - Programs Commission Chair •Lead work plan development •Make sure work plan is not overloaded •Ensure there is a “lead(s)” to each initiative •Present proposed work plan to City Council Staff Liaison •Provide technical expertise, recommendations and advice to the commission •Provide clear recommendations to City Management and/or Council to consider •Ensure work plan template fields are completed Charge 1: Study & Report Study a specific issue or event and report its findings to the Council No vote No recommendation Charge 2: Review & Comment Review specific policy issue and staff will seek comments from each individual member of the group to pass on to Council No vote No recommendation Charge 3: Review & Recommend Review a specific policy issue and provide a recommendation on the issue to Council Majority vote required Recommendation Charge 4: Review & Decide Study, review and decide on an issue. The decision will be the City’s official position on the matter unless it is formally reversed by Council Majority vote required Decide Board/Commission Member Handbook 17 | Page Charge 1: Study & Report 2: Review & Comment 3: Review & Recommend 4: Review & Decide Commission Role Study a specific issue or event and report its findings to Council Review a specific policy issue and staff will seek comments from each individual member of the group to pass on to Council Review a specific policy issue and provide a recommendation on the issue to Council Study, review and decide on an issue. The Decision will be the City’s official position on the matter unless the issue is formally reversed by Council Commission Vote No vote is taken by the commission No vote is taken by the commission A majority vote is required A majority vote is required Commission Recommendation No official recommendation is provided to Council No official recommendation is provided to Council An official recommendation is provided to Council No official recommendation is provided to Council Report Type Required: Advisory Communication & Staff Report Required: Staff Report Required: Staff Report Optional: Advisory Communication None Work Plan Approval Process: Approving work plans is a three-part process. Work plans development starts in the summer months and ends in December. 1 Chair Presents Proposed Work Plan • Annual work session meeting (typically October) • Meeting Purpose: Chair to present proposed work plan and allow Council to ask clarifying questions from the chair 2 Staff Presents Proposed Work Plan • Annual work session meeting (typically November) • Meeting Purpose: City staff (City Manager Comments) will present proposed work plans along with recommended changes 3 Council Review and Final Approval • Annual City Council meeting (typically first meeting in December) • City staff will incorporate council changes from previous meeting and present proposed work plans for approval Board/Commission Member Handbook 18 | Page Work Plan vs Non-Work Plan Items Work completed by the commission should be on their approved work plan. At times, non-work plan items may arise mid-year. While these items are important, commissions are asked to focus on approved work plan items or ask for a work plan modification mid-year. It is rare to make a modification in the middle of the work plan calendar. MEETINGS Types of Meetings 1 Regular Meetings • All Commissions have a regular meeting schedule; e.g., “7 p.m. on the fourth Thursday of each month.” • Regular meetings can be rescheduled if members and the public are given notice at a prior meeting • If notice at a prior meeting cannot be given for a schedule change, the regular meeting is considered to have been cancelled and a special meeting called • At the regular February meeting, each commission holds annual elections for Chair and Vice Chair 2 Special Meetings • A meeting held in addition to the regular meeting schedule • Can be scheduled without notice at a prior meeting 3 Joint Work Session Meeting • Work sessions are held jointly with City Council • Every Commission has at least one a year • Goal is to review current work plan and get direction if needed **All meetings are audio recorded and some are televised. Work Plan Items •Approved by City Council •Focus work •Alignment with overall work of the council •Dedicated resources •Delegation of some authority and staff time Non-Work Plan Items •Items not approved by City Council, including items located in the “parking lot” •No dedicated resources •Can ask Council for work plan modification through advisory communication (rare) Board/Commission Member Handbook 19 | Page Attendance Attendance Policy: There are two ways members fail to meet attendance requirements. Student members do not have an attendance requirement. 1 75% Requirement • If a member fails to meet the 75% attendance requirement, they will not be removed from the Board or Commission until the end of the calendar year. At this time, if the member wants to ask to be reappointed, they can request the Community Engagement Coordinator to include this in the staff report. 2 Three Consecutive Meeting Requirement • If a member fails to attend 3 consecutive meetings (4 for Planning Commission), they will be removed from the Board or Commission effective immediately upon their 3rd absence (4th for Planning Commission). Under this scenario, members cannot request reappointment, but can reapply for the Board or Commission for the following year. Counted vs Not Counted: Board and commission meetings listed under “Counted towards Attendance” will be used to factor into the board and commission attendance policy. “Not Counted towards Attendance” are not used in the formula. *A rescheduled meeting occurs when members are notified of a new meeting date/time at a prior meeting. If shorter notice is given, the previously scheduled meeting is considered to have been cancelled and replaced with special meeting. **A cancelled meeting can be done by the Chair, City Council, City Manager or by the majority of voting members. Reasons a meeting may be cancelled include: • Insufficient business • Lack of quorum • Conflict with a holiday or religious observance • Inclement weather • Community emergency Attendance Sheets: Attendance sheets are maintained by the Staff Liaison. Annually the City conducts an attendance assessment to identify attendance issues. Members Responsibility: Since attendance impacts quorum and the ability for a board or commission to conduct business, it is important to communicate conflicts in advance of the meeting. Members should contact the staff liaison if: • They cannot attend a scheduled meeting Counted towards Attendance Regular Meeting with Quorum Regular Meeting without Quorum Rescheduled Meeting* Canceled Meeting** Not Counted towards Attendance Special Meetings Joint Work Sessions Subcommittee or working group meetings Board/Commission Member Handbook 20 | Page • They will be late or need to leave early Quorum and Voting Voting: • Regular members can participate in voting • Student members are expected to participate in the discussion but do not vote and do not count towards quorum Quorum = A majority of seated voting members • Quorum is required to vote on business items • Meetings can be held without a quorum, however, members cannot “conduct business” by taking votes on motions Meeting Packet Each meeting packet contains: • Agenda • Draft Minutes • Reports and Recommendations The packet posted in Novus Agenda Board web at least three days prior to your scheduled meeting. It is important that you review the packet in advance to be prepared. Agenda Static Items (will always appear): I. Roll Call II. Approval of Meeting Agenda III. Approval of Meeting Minutes IV. Community Comment V. Reports & Recommendations VI. Chair & Member Comments VII. Staff Comments VIII. Adjournment Additional Categories (in green): I. Roll Call II. Approval of Meeting Agenda III. Approval of Meeting Minutes IV. Special Presentations & Recognitions V. Public Hearings VI. Community Comment VII. Reports & Recommendations VIII. Chair & Member Comments IX. Staff Comments X. Adjournment Community Comment: • Residents can speak during community comment on any topic that is NOT already on the current agenda. • Members should not engage in direct debate or dialogue with the resident outside of thanking them for the comment or noting when the item might be discussed by the BC in the future. • Commissions should not take action from the content of the community commenter. • Commenters must provide their name and address before speaking. • Commenters have 3 minutes to speak. Board/Commission Member Handbook 21 | Page Minutes Minutes are recorded at each Board or Commission meeting. Commissions may have an additional city staff person in attendance that supports the liaison with this particular task. Meeting minutes’ document actions taken at a meeting, not discussion. Meeting minutes will include: • Meeting name including the date, place and time • Members in attendance • Approval of previous meeting minutes and corrections, if any • Motions made (exact wording of the motion, who made the motion, seconded the motion, and the result of the vote) • Reports (can use bulleted lists) • Other actions Meeting minutes will NOT include: • What was said • Who said it Each meeting packet will contain a draft of the minutes from the previous meeting. After the minutes are approved, your City Staff Liaison will submit the approved minutes for publication on the City’s website and to City Council for receipt. This is an important channel of communication to City Council from the Commissions. Robert’s Rules of Order Edina Boards and Commissions use Robert’s Rules of Order to transact business through motions. Robert’s Rules of Order will prevail in the event of a procedural conflict. General Principles: • Only one subject (main motion) is before the group at one time. • Negative motions are generally not permitted, phrase the motion as a positive action. If the BC does not want to take action, the motion should be voted down. • Only one member speaks at a time. Each speaker should first be recognized by the Chair. The maker of a motion is usually allowed to speak first and last. • Each item is presented for full debate. Each member speaks once until all members have had an opportunity to speak. • All members have equal rights. The rights of the minority are protected and heard, but the will of the majority prevails. Steps to a motion: • Member addresses the Chair and the Chair recognizes the member. • Member states motion “I move to adopt the policy.” • Another member seconds the motion “I second.” • Chair repeats the motion to the BC. • Motion is discussed by the group. • Members can make subsidiary motions that assist the group in disposing of the main motion, “I move to table this discussion to the next meeting.” • Members vote on the subsidiary motion. • If applicable, members vote on the main motion. • Chair announces the results. Board/Commission Member Handbook 22 | Page COMMUNICATION Open Meeting Law Why it exists: • Prohibits actions from being taken at a secret meeting, where it is impossible for the interested public to become fully informed concerning decisions of public bodies or to detect improper influences. • Ensures the public’s right to be informed. • Afford the public an opportunity to present its views to the public body. To Comply: • Provide public notice of the meeting a minimum of three days in advance. • Hold meetings in public places. Violation of Open Meeting Law: There is a violation of open meeting law if there is discussion of business between quorums of members outside of a publicly noticed meeting. Serial communication defined below is an open meeting law violation. Serial Communication: Serial communication is communication between Board and Commission members that lead to a concurrence among the majority of the members. Serial communication may involve a series of communications (example: email, face-to-face, text) with each communication involving less than a quorum of the Board or Commission, but when taken as a whole, involve a majority of the Board or Commission. Ensure Compliance: • Email communication intended for the group to your Staff Liaison for distribution. • Members should not “reply all” to group messages. • Members should not blind copy other members. Committees and Working Groups: While Committees and Working Groups are not covered under the Open Meeting Law, some Committee or Working Group meetings may be designated as public meetings by the City Council, or the Commission based on potential public interest in the topic. Commission Subcommittee Working Group Task Force Tenure Ongoing Temporary Temporary Temporary Members Residents Commission members only Commission + Public members As defined Board/Commission Member Handbook 23 | Page Scope Work Plan Work Plan Item Work Plan Item Task Force Charge OML Required Not required Not required Not required Staff Support Yes No Not typically Yes Reports To Council Commission Commission Council or City Manager Communication with City Council Recommendations to City Council. When presenting recommendations to City Council it is essential that Board and Commission members keep the following in mind: • Recommendations should be in written form. • Ideas should be expressed in clear and concise language. • Proposed solutions should be viable and cost-effective. • Recommendations should identify reasons for the changes suggested. • Advice should reflect the views of a consensus or a majority of Board and Commission members. Role of Staff Liaison. One of the primary roles of the Staff Liaison is to assist in delivering information from the City Council to the commission, and vice versa. It is the responsibility of the Staff Liaison to communicate the guidance of their Board and Commission completely and impartially. City Council Code of Conduct. City Council Members promise Boards and Commissions they will: • View Boards and Commissions as vitally important resources to support our decision-making • Communicate effectively with Boards and Commissions to ensure they have the tools to do their work • Give clear direction as a body and take adequate time to review the result of their deliberations • Because of the value of the independent advice of boards, commissions, and task forces to the public decision-making process, members of Council shall refrain from using their position to influence the deliberations or outcomes of board, commission, and task force proceedings • The expectation is that Council Members will not typically attend Board, Commission, Committee, Working Group or Task Force meetings. However, under special circumstances, if we attend a meeting: o We will do so only as an observer and prior to attending we will notify the appropriate staff liaison o Strive for good communication by reporting out to other Council Members Board/Commission Member Handbook 24 | Page Communication Tools. Boards and Commissions have five primary tools for communication with the City Council. Since Council time is limited and it is important that all members of the Council receive the information, it is imperative that communication is done through these formal channels. The table below outlines each tool and its intended purpose: 1 Meeting Minutes • Meeting minutes are intended to give members a record of Board and Commission proceedings. After the minutes are approved, they are included as part of the upcoming Council packet. Council members are very diligent about reading Board and Commission minutes. 2 Joint Work Session • Joint work sessions are held at least once a year. This is an opportunity to update the Council on the Commission’s work plan and to get Council feedback on the progress to date. 3 Annual Work Plan • The annual work plan process enables Commissions to share their goals for the upcoming year. The Council reviews those goals and other ideas before giving final direction on Commission priorities. • Council will assign each work plan item a Council Charge 4 Staff Reports • Staff reports are prepared by staff to forward a regulatory item or other goal from the Commission’s approved work plan to a Council meeting for approval or direction. It is staff’s responsibility to outline the Commission's recommendation, as well as staff recommendations, and to highlight any important differences between the two. 5 Advisory Communication • Advisory communication is prepared by the Commission members under the direction of the Commission. This template should be used when the Commission wants to give input on an issue but due to timing or the nature of the issue, meeting minutes are deemed insufficient. Advisory communications should be used if the Commission wishes to advise the Council on a topic not included on their approved work plan. Communication & Advocacy with the Public We want members to promote their Board and Commission’s work with the public, however, as a board or commission member you are asked to take care when conveying any decisions of the Board of Commission. Board/Commission Member Handbook 25 | Page Media Contacts: Can I reach out to the media? •The City handles distribution of press releases. If a board or commission member would like to make additional media requests or pitches to specific media, the staff liaison and Communications Department must be notified. This includes columns and editorials that are attributed as being written by a board or commission member and/or relating to the activities of the board or commission. Staff liaisons should route these requests to the Communications Department. Who responds to the media requests? •Once the City Council has taken action on a policy, the board or commission should refer media requests to the City Council unless directly asked by the City Council to respond. If a statement is needed from the board or commission, the Chair is typically the one asked to provide one. What if the media contacts a liaison or board or commission member directly? •Gather information. Don’t respond immediately. Instead say, “I’m sorry, but I can't respoind right now. Please give me some basic information about what you are looking for. I'll submit your request to the appropriate person who will get back to you as soon as they can.” Then, gather the following information: •Media representative’s name and contact information. •Deadline. •Questions they have or focus of the story. •Get help. Staff liaisons can help determine who should respond and get board or commission members help from Communications Department staff if needed. All opinions and responses should reflect the official position of the board or commission. What if a board or commission members wants to give a personal opinion? •It is important to determine when a board or commission member is communicating on behalf of the board or commission and when they are stating their own personal opinion. If they are expressing their own opinion about board or commission business (which may be different than the official board or commission position) make sure they identify their opinion as their own, and are not representing the board or commission. Rights •You are a resident •Ability to engage on topics of interest •Speak as a resident at public hearings or community comment regarding topics not related to commission work Responsibilities •You are a board or commission member •Represent the decision of the board/commission •Use board/commission communication channels to provide feedback regarding topics related to work •You are advisory to Council, only advocate for public if directed Board/Commission Member Handbook 26 | Page The best way for people to correspond with the commission is through the “Commission Correspondence Form” located on the City’s website. If members of a commission are contacted by the media, they should immediately contact their staff liaison. Social Media: ETHICAL AND RESPECTFUL CONDUCT Conflict of Interest Definition: any member who has a financial interest in, or who may receive a financial benefit as a result of, any BC action or if there is potential for the appearance of conflict of interest. Members who have a conflict of interest must: • Disclose the conflict of interest to the group, and • Abstain from discussing or voting on the matter. Examples: • Individuals who work in a consultant capacity currently or in the past for the City of Edina on development, streets, or other types of projects • Individuals who have private businesses/organizations Members who have a potential conflict of interest shall: • Discuss potential conflict of interest with the staff liaison • Disclose the conflict of interest to the group, and • Abstain from the Council discussion debate and vote Do’s •Use good judgement and moral conduct if you identify yourself online as a Board Member or Commissioner •Refer people to the City’s website or other sources of official information or a specific staff member •Assume that your speech and activity on social media reflects upon your position as a Board Member or Commissioner •Understand that when using social media, anything you say or post becomes a permanent part of the internet •Expect that anything posted in a public online forum may be accessed by the City at any time without notice. Don’t •Act as a spokesperson unless assigned that role by the staff liaison •Post or disseminate non-public information •Engage in speech that is false, deceptive, libelous, slanderous, misleading, obscene, sexually explicit or expresses a bias •Assume personal information posted on social media is protected Board/Commission Member Handbook 27 | Page Gifts • Members may not receive gifts from any “interested person” in conjunction with their BC duties. An “interested person” could be a business/organization who could benefit from a decision/recommendation approved by the board or commission. • BC can recommend acceptance of general gifts through the City’s donation policy. Respectful Behavior Members should STRIVE TO: • Treat people with courtesy, politeness, and kindness • Encourage others to express their opinions and ideas • Listen to what others have to say • Use the ideas of others to improve decisions and outcomes • Recognize and respect differences • Prepare for the issues at hand • Focus on the business of the body • Consider only legally germane information in decisions • Act as a decision maker, not an advocate Members should AVOID: • Speaking over or cutting off another individual’s comments • Insulting, disparaging, or putting down people or their ideas • Bullying other members by displaying a pattern of belittling, demeaning, judging or patronizing comments • Violence or the threat of violence will not be The Chair or the Staff Liaison can call for the removal of any anyone who threatens or commits an act of violence. Code of Ethics • I have been entrusted by the Edina City Council to perform my duties and services as a volunteer Board or Commission Member in manner that is always in the best interests of the community of Edina. • While honest differences of opinion may develop, I will work harmoniously with other Board or Commission members to assure residents the services they require. • I will invite all residents to express their opinions so I may be properly informed prior to making my decisions. I will make them based solely upon the facts available to me. I will support the final decision of the Board or Commission. • I must devote the time, study and thought necessary to carry out my duties. • I understand that the Board or Commission members recommend policies, the City Council establishes policies and the staff is responsible for administering the policies of the City Council. • I understand that as a Board or Commission Member, I have no authority outside of the proper meeting of the Board/Commission. • I understand that all Board/Commission meetings shall be open to the public, except as provided by law. • I understand that it is my duty as a Board or Commission member to treat all residents, staff and fellow Board and Commission members in a respectful and professional manner at all times. • I will withdraw from discussions and decision-making actions in cases where I have a conflict of interest and I will disclose those conflicts of interest when they arise. Board/Commission Member Handbook 28 | Page Novus Boardview Packets are created electronically by each Board and Commission’s staff liaison. Liaisons complete packets three business days prior to the regular scheduled meeting. Members are asked to review meeting packets in advance using the Novus Boardview Portal. URL: Edina.novusagenda.com/boardweb Username: first letter of first name and full last name Password: New Members should receive a password reset email that is active for only 24 hours. Contact MJ Lamon, if you have questions or forgot your password. 952-826-0360 mlamon@edinamn.gov Date: April 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:G rac e Hancoc k, S us tainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:O rdinanc e No. 2023-06: EV-S olar Zoning C ode Amendment Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R eview and recommend the C ity C ouncil approve the O rdinance Amendment. I N TR O D U C TI O N: R eview proposed City zoning code amendment to clarify and simplify existing City Code and add electric vehicle language to better guide projects voluntarily adding on-site solar or electric vehicle charging infrastructure and ensure progress on Edina Climate Action P lan goals. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Ordinance No. 2023-06: EV-Solar Zoning Code Amendment Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Pres entation April 26, 2023 Planning Commission Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Amended solar ordinance and new electric vehicle ordinance proposal Situation: The Edina community is dedicated to building a sustainable environment where current and future generations benefit from clean air and water, climate and community resiliency, and access to nature, as reflected in City Council value statements. In particular, the City recognizes the risks of climate change and has set a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 45% by 2030. Building energy use accounts for more than half of Edina’s greenhouse gas footprint, while transportation is the second highest contributor to Edina’s greenhouse gas emissions. The City has set an ambitious target to increase renewable energy from 1.6% to 17% of citywide residential and commercial electric use by 2030, with 20% coming from renewables produced within the City boundaries. Further, Edina’s Climate Action Plan calls for 25% of the vehicles used in Edina to be electric by 2030. The City of Edina thus proposes to amend Edina City Code to prepare for solar infrastructure, specifically for opportunities in ground-mounted and carport solar. It also proposes to amend Edina City Code to prepare for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure in multifamily, commercial and public space zoning districts. The Planning Commission previously received a draft of these amendment proposals at their March 29th work session. Since then, the proposal has been changed to remove the recommendation that Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) not be allowed in the right-of- way (ROW). Any ROW regulation changes will be considered as part of a future ROW ordinance amendment in Chapter 24 of City Code. Background: Policy Development Process Nov-Dec 2022: The proposed City Code amendments refer to a broad array of resources and best practices, including other cities with similar and different types of codes. Resources consulted to draft this ordinance come from: Dec 2022- Feb 2023: After incorporating best practices, the draft incorporates comments from staff engagement meetings in December 2022 and January 2023, a staff survey, and emails with department leaders. Departments consulted included: Building Inspections Division Engineering Department Facilities Division Fire Department Planning Department Public Works Department Overall feedback from staff was positive to build parameters for the context of Edina in a way that is strategic and planful, so that all staff can be prepared to answer questions from City stakeholders about EV technologies, especially based on previous discussions and questions the City has sought. Mar 2023: The draft was shared with the Planning Commission at their March 15, 2023 work session meeting. Apr 2023: Planning Commission public hearing will take place May 2023: City Council will receive these amendments to consider for adoption Action Requested: Staff seeks public input and Planning Commission comment to accompany City Code amendment proposal to City Council in May, 2023. Appendices: A. Reference list for City Solar and EV code best practices B. For Review: Proposed EVSE and Solar Ordinance Amendment Nov-Dec 2022 Consultant literature and resource review Dec 2022 -Feb 2023 Staff Workshops Mar-Apr 2023 Planning Commission May 2023 City Council APPENDIX A Title Source Solar Installations Best Practice Guidance for Solar and Zoning – Accessory use. (January 2022). SolSmart https://solsmart.org/resources/best-practice-guidance- for-solar-and-zoning/ Day, Megan. (April 21, 2017). Best Practices for Zoning for Solar. National Renewable Energy Laboratory https://www.nrel.gov/state-local- tribal/blog/posts/best-practices-in-zoning-for- solar.html Minnesota Solar Energy Solar Energy Industries Association Conference trainings, presentations, and discussions https://www.mnseia.org/ Minnesota Solar Model Ordinance. (2020). Great Plains Institute https://www.growsolar.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/08/MN-Solar-Ordinance- 2020.pdf Planning for Solar Energy. (April 2014). American Planning Association https://solsmart.org/wp- content/uploads/APA_PlanningforSolarEnergy.pdf RBI Solar Tee-Shape Canopy specifications on ground-mount and carport solar https://www.rbisolar.com/solutions/solar-carport/ Solar Energy Planning & Implementation Resources. Metropolitan Council https://metrocouncil.org/Communities/Planning/Local- Planning-Assistance/Solar.aspx Solar Array Installed on the Twin Cities Campus (August 9, 2020). University of Minnesota https://sustainable.umn.edu/sustainability -news/solar-array-installed-twin-cities- campus Solar Energy Toolkit for Local Governments. SolSmart https://solsmart.org/solar-energy-a-toolkit-for- local- governments/planning-zoning-development/ SolSmart Program Guide. (January 2021). SolSmart https://solsmart.org/wp-content/uploads/SolSmart- Program-Guide-2021.pdf Electric Vehicle Supply Infrastructure 2020 Minnesota Building Code. (Mar, 2020). ICC Digital Codes https://codes.iccsafe.org/content/MNBC2020P1 A Best Practice Guide for EVSE Regulations. (October 2022). Electric Vehicle Council powered by Fuels Institute https://www.fuelsinstitute.org/research/reports/a- best-practice- guide-for-evse-regulations/ Bernard, Joe. (March 10, 2022). Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment: Incentives for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure. City of Minneapolis City Planning Commission https://www2.minneapolismn.gov/business- services/planning-zoning/amendments/adopted- proposed/recently-adopted/electric-vehicle-charging/ ChargePoint CT4000 Make-Ready Requirements Specification. (2016). ChargePoint https://www.chargepoint.com/files/Make-Ready- Requirements-Specification.pdf Cooke, Claire and Ross, Brian. (June 2019). Summary of Best Practices in Electric Vehicle Ordinances. Great Plains Institute https://www.betterenergy.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/06/GPI_EV_Ordinance_Summ ary_web.pdf Installation Requirements for Electric Vehicle Charging Stations. (January 2021). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency https://www.pca.state.mn.us/sites/default/files/p- gen4-20.pdf Kelly, Kay; Noblet,Stacy; and Brown, Abby. (Dec, 2019). Best Practices for Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment Installations in the National Parks. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/74806.pdf Navratil, Liz and Bjorhus, Jennifer. (November 25, 2022). Mpls. offers incentives for EV chargers in new garages after state code blocks requirement. Star https://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-offers- incentives-for-ev-chargers-in-new-garages- after-state- code-blocks-requirement/600229871/ Tribune. Plug Share Mapping Tool (2022). https://www.plugshare.com/ Rivard, Raymond. (May 22, 2022). New Richfield ordinance addresses electric vehicle charging. Hometown Source. https://www.hometownsource.com/sun_current/co mmunity/richfield/new-richfield-ordinance-addresses- electric-vehicle-charging/article_9bf351a4-aa0a-11ec- 99aa-2325ec046a71.html Salcido, V R; Tillou, M; and Franconi, E. (July 2021) Electric Vehicle Charging for Residential and Commercial Energy Codes Technical Brief. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory. https://www.energycodes.gov/sites/default/files/2021- 07/TechBrief_EV_Charging_July2021.pdf Sutor, Julie. (August 31, 2021). Electrification Coalition Releases EV Policy Toolkit for Cities. Electrification Coalition. https://electrificationcoalition.org/wp- content/uploads/2021/08/Electrifying-Transportation- in-Municipalities-FINAL-9.9.21.pdf U.S. Department of Energy, Alternative Fuels Data Center. Electric Vehicle Readiness. https://afdc.energy.gov/pev-readiness.html Wyatt, Jessi. (Feb. 8, 2021). Database of Climate Ordinances Now Available to Planners. Great Plains Institute. https://betterenergy.org/blog/database-of-climate- ordinances-now- available-to-planners/ Zukowski, Dan. (Oct. 25, 2022). EV charging station rollout hampered by outdated state, City regulations: report. Smart Cities Dive. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/ev-charging- stations-hampered-outdated-state-city-policies- regulations- permits/634819/?%3A+Smart+Cities+Dive%3A+Dail y+Dive+10-29-+2022= City Examples for both topics Aspen, CO Minneapolis, MN Auburn Hills, MI Red Wing, MN Bloomington, MN Richfield, MN Des Moines, IA St. Louis Park, MN Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2023-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY INFRASTRUCTURE The City Council of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article I, Section 36-10 of the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-10. – Definitions. Solar energy system means an energy system that consists of one or more solar collection devices, solar energy related "balance of system" equipment, and other associated infrastructure with the primary intention of generating electricity, storing electricity, or otherwise converting solar energy to a different form of energy. Solar energy systems may generate energy in excess of the energy requirements of a property. Solar energy systems cannot exceed building height requirements. Residential roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed two feet above the rooftop to which it is attached. Commercial, flat-roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed four feet from the roof to which it is attached to. (1) Carport solar energy system means a solar energy system that is installed on a carport structure, and which may include electric vehicle supply equipment or energy storage facilities. (2) Ground-mounted solar energy system means a solar energy system mounted on a rack or pole that is ballasted on, or is attached to, the ground. (3) Roof-mounted solar energy system means a solar energy system mounted on a rack that is ballasted on, or is attached to, the roof of a building or structure. Section 2. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 2, Section1269 of the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1269. – Energy Collection Systems and as a permitted accessory use. (a) Wind Energy: Facilities and equipment designed for the collection of solar energy or wind energy shall maintain the same setbacks as are required for principal buildings or structures and shall not be located within the front yard. Solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. (b) Solar energy systems may generate energy in excess of the energy requirements of a property. (c) Carport solar energy systems are permitted as accessory uses in all districts excluding R-1 and R-2. Carport solar energy systems must have a 17-foot vehicle Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 clearance and may not exceed 25 feet in height or the maximum building height requirements in the underlying zoning district. (d) Ground-mounted solar energy systems are permitted as accessory uses in all districts excluding R-1 and R-2. Ground-mounted solar energy systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height when oriented at maximum tilt. Appearance and operation of solar energy systems shall comply with the Chapter 20 Article VI of the City Code (property maintenance code). Ground-mounted solar energy systems are exempt from lot coverage and impervious surface requirements if the area under the system contains vegetative ground cover. (e) Roof-mounted solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. Residential roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed two feet above the rooftop to which it is attached. Commercial, flat-roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed four feet from the roof to which it is attached to. Section 3. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 2, Section 1273 of the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1273. – Utility buildings and structures (a) Utility buildings and structures owned by the City. Utility buildings and structures owned by the City and used for rendering service to all or any part of the City (but excluding warehouses, maintenance buildings and storage yards) shall be a permitted principal or accessory use in all districts. (b) Other utility buildings and structures. Utility buildings and structures owned by private utility companies or governmental units other than the City and used for rendering service to all or any part of the City (but excluding warehouses, maintenance buildings and storage yards) shall be a conditional use in all districts and shall only be constructed pursuant to a conditional use permit granted in accordance with article V of this chapter. (c) Utility poles and wires, water, gas, electric and mechanical equipment regulations. (1) If the footprint is 36 square feet in area or less, and six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be permitted at any location in a front, side or rear yard with no minimum setback from any property line. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) height is allowable to eight feet. If utility or mechanical equipment is located within a city right-of-way, a permit is required. (2) If the footprint is larger than 36 square feet in area or six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. Utility and mechanical equipment that is grouped together, excluding electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City, and in the aggregate exceeds 36 square feet in area shall also be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. EVSE with a height greater than eight feet must abide by these requirements. (3) Air conditioning units and privately owned mechanical equipment in the R- 1 and R-2 zoning districts shall comply with the setback requirements for accessory buildings and structures in accordance with the table in section 36-438(1). (4) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets, excluding EVSE owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City, in accordance with section 36-1459. (5) Noise from mechanical equipment shall be subject to the City's noise regulations in accordance article II, division 5 of chapter 16. Section 4. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 3, Subdivision II, Section 1324 in the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1324. - Parking space reductions. Reductions. The following off-street parking reductions may be utilized jointly or separately except as indicated otherwise: (1) Transit. The required number of spaces for a building may be reduced by ten percent if the building is located within one-quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop; to qualify, the transit stop must be served by regular transit service on all days of the week and adequate pedestrian access must be available between the transit stop and the parcel. Information about transit routes and schedules should be posted in public spaces within the building to encourage the use of transit. (2) Car-share parking. A reduction of up to one space per reserved parking space for car share vehicles or five percent of the required parking spaces, whichever is greater, may be granted for any development that provides reserved parking for car-share vehicles. Reserved parking spaces for car-share vehicles may be provided in any required or non- required off-street parking space. Parking spaces for car-share vehicles shall be provided in convenient, accessible locations within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (3) A ten percent reduction in parking may be approved by the City planner or the City planner's designee provided that one of the following conditions are met: a. If a residential use: One covered, long-term bicycle parking space per three dwelling units. b. If a retail or service use: One covered, long-term bicycle parking space per 5,000 square feet of retail or service uses. c. 1 short-term bike space per 5,000 s.f. of retail/services uses. In order to qualify for this reduction, the long-term bicycle parking must: a. Be protected from weather and from access by unauthorized persons; b. Consist of bike racks or lockers anchored so that they cannot be easily removed; and c. Allow both the bicycle frame and the wheels to be locked with the bicycle in an upright position using a standard U-lock. (4) A five percent reduction in parking will be allowed if ten percent or more parking stalls are served by EVSE. Five percent of the parking stalls will be calculated before the reduction, rounded to the nearest whole number. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 4 (4) (5) The area which would have been occupied by the eliminated parking spaces in items (1) to (3) above must be devoted to pervious surfaces, stormwater facilities, tree retention or native landscaping as directed by City planner or City planner's designee. Section 5. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 3, Section 26 in the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1326. - Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) parking regulations. (1) Applicability. (a) These regulations shall apply to the following zoning districts: a. Automobile Parking District b. Mixed Development District c. Planned Commercial District d. Planned Industrial District e. Planned Office District f. Planned Residence District g. Planned Unit Development h. Regional Medical District (b) Any EVSE installed before the date of adoption of these regulations will be assumed to be legal, non-conforming structures. (2) Type of EVSE. (a) Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 chargers are permitted as an accessory use in existing parking structures or parking lots in the abovementioned zoning districts. (b) An assembly of more than 24 EVSE adjacent to each other is prohibited on a single parcel. (c) The EVSE must incorporate a cord management system or method to eliminate potential for cable entanglement, user injury or connector damage from lying on the ground. (3) EV parking stall requirements. (a) Parking stalls with EVSE shall count towards off-street parking minimums required in the zoning code. (4) Location and Accessibility. (a) EVSE may not obstruct a sidewalk or walkway and must minimize trip and safety hazards. (b) EVSE must not interfere with the right-of-way sight lines. (c) EVSE and parking stalls served by EVSE shall follow Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 5 (5) Parking restrictions/requirements. (a) Parking stalls served by EVSE shall be reserved for EVs only. The developer or owner shall include signage and parking restrictions on the stalls to ensure availability and preference for EVs. (6) Design, installation, operations and maintenance. (a) EVSE shall be installed pursuant to manufacturer specification and shall comply with all applicable state building codes, state fire codes, state electrical codes, and relevant permitting processes. (b) EVSE shall be adequately maintained for safety and continual usage, following the property maintenance code. The area surrounding the EVSE shall be maintained appropriately to reduce hazards and allow access to EVSE, including snow removal around the equipment to allow for safety and access. (c) EVSE signage shall include a phone number to contact for regular maintenance issues and state to call 911 in case of an emergency. (d) EVSE signage may include wayfinding and usage instructions, but all other signage must meet the requirements of City Code Section 36-1655. Signs with a total area of over six square feet must follow the sign requirements of City Code Section 36-1655. (7) Definition of Terms (a) Electric Vehicle (EV): any vehicle that is licensed and registered for operation on public and private highways, roads, and streets; either partially or exclusively, on electrical energy from the grid, or an off-board source, that is stored on-board via a battery for motive purpose. “Electric vehicle” includes: (1) a battery electric vehicle; (2) a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. (b) Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE): provide electric power to the vehicle to recharge the vehicle's batteries. EVSE systems include the physical charger, software, and communications protocols that deliver energy efficiently and safely to the vehicle. EVSE does not include equipment located on the electric vehicles themselves. EVSE systems do not include mechanical or utility equipment related to delivering energy to the EVSE system and any connected EV, such as a transformer. (c) Charging Levels: the standardized indicators of electrical force or voltage, at which an electric vehicle’s battery is recharged. The terms 1,2, and 3 are the most common charging levels, and include the following specifications: (1) Level-1 is considered slow charging. It is considered 120V single phase EVSE. (2) Level-2 is considered medium charging. It is considered 208V/240V single phase AC EVSE. (3) Level-3 or DC Fast Charging is considered fast or rapid charging. It is considered AC 208V or 480V, 3 phase supply. Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 6 Section 6. Chapter 36, Article XII, Division 5, Section 1457, required screening in the Edina City Code is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1457. - Required. The following uses shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision with the exception of solar energy systems. Solar energy systems are exempt from screening requirements. (1) Nonresidential principal buildings or structures, and any building or structure accessory thereto, shall be screened from lots in the R-1 district which are used for single dwelling unit buildings and which are located within 200 feet of the nonresidential use. The distance shall be the shortest distance between the nonresidential building or structure to be screened and the nearest lot line of the R- 1 district lot, but shall not extend across a street; (2) Principal buildings or structures, or any building or structure accessory thereto, located in the Planned Industrial District or Planned Commercial District shall be screened from lots used for any residential purpose which are located within 200 feet. The distance shall be the shortest distance between the PID or PCD building or structure to be screened and the nearest lot line of the residential lot, but shall not extend across a street; (3) Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces and all loading facilities shall be screened from streets located within 50 feet, and from lots which are used for any residential purpose which are located within 50 feet. Said distance shall be the shortest distance between the parking facility or loading facility and the nearest part of the street or the nearest lot line of the residential lot; (4) Trash storage facilities, including recycling storage facilities, shall be screened from all lot lines and public road rights-of-way; and (5) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets, excluding EVSE owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City. Section 7. This ordinance is effective upon second reading of the Ordinance. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 7 Attest: City Clerk Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Survey Responses Public Hearing Comments-Solar and EV Better Together Edina Project: Solar and Electric Vehicle Ordinance Amendments No Responses VISITORS 6 CONTRIBUTORS 0 RESPONSES 0 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 0 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous The CITY of EDINA Solar and Electric Vehicle Ordinance Amendment Proposal April 26, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager The CITY of EDINACode Amendment Purpose •Meet Edina Climate Action Plan Goals •TL 4: Increase battery electric vehicle (BEV) utilization to 25% of community wide rolling stock (from approximately 357 vehicles to 9100 vehicles community-wide). •BE 5: Increase renewable energy (distributed and purchased) from 1.6% to 17% of citywide residential and commercial electric use by 2030 www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINACode Amendment Summary •The City proposes ordinance changes related to Chapter 36 of the Edina City Code, to clarify and simplify existing City Code to better guide projects voluntarily adding on-site solar or electric vehicle charging infrastructure and ensure progress on Edina Climate Action Plan goals. These changes include: 1. Amend existing Solar Ordinance Add carport and ground-mounted solar energy systems: Definitions Requirements 2. Add EV Ordinance Add Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE): Definition Requirements www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA Amend Solar Ordinance www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINACode Amendment: Solar Installations •Defines three types of solar installations: carport, ground-mount, rooftop •Clarifies parameters for wind energy •Excludes R-1 and R-2 from installing carport or ground-mount solar energy systems www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINASolar: Definitions Section Current Language New Language Sec. 36- 10 Definition s Solar energy system means an energy system that consists of one or more solar collection devices, solar energy related "balance of system" equipment, and other associated infrastructure with the primary intention of generating electricity, storing electricity, or otherwise converting solar energy to a different form of energy. Solar energy systems may generate energy in excess of the energy requirements of a property. Solar energy systems cannot exceed building height requirements. Residential roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed two feet above the rooftop to which it is attached. Commercial, flat- roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed four feet from the roof to which it is attached to. (1)Carport solar energy system means a solar energy system that is installed on a carport structure that is accessory to a parking area, and which may include electric vehicle supply equipment or energy storage facilities. (2)Ground-mounted solar energy system means a solar energy system mounted on a rack or pole that is ballasted on, or is attached to, the ground and the system is accessory to the primary use. (3)Roof-mounted solar energy system means a solar energy system mounted on a rack that is ballasted on, or is attached to, the roof of a building or structure. 6 The CITY of EDINACarport Solar example www.EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINAGround-mount Solar example www.EdinaMN.gov 8 The CITY of EDINARooftop Solar example www.EdinaMN.gov 9 The CITY of EDINASolar: Setbacks & Accessory Use Section Current Language Updated Language Sec. 36-1269. - Energy collection systems setbacks and as a permitted accessory use Facilities and equipment designed for the collection of solar energy or wind energyshall maintainthe same setbacks as are requiredfor principalbuildingsor structures and shall not be located within the front yard. Solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. (a) Wind Energy: Facilities and equipment designed for the collection of solar energy or wind energy shall maintain the same setbacks as are required for principal buildings or structures and shall not be located within the front yard. Solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. 10 The CITY of EDINASolar: Setbacks & Accessory Use Section New Language Sec. 36-1269. - Energy collection systems setbacks and as a permitted accessory use (b) Solar energy systems may generate energy in excess of the energy requirements of a property. (c) Carport solar energy systems are permitted as accessory uses in all districts excluding R-1 and R-2. Carport solar energy systems must have a 17-foot vehicle clearance and may not exceed 25 feet in height or the maximum building height requirements in the underlying zoning district. (d) Ground-mounted solar energy systems are permitted as accessory uses in all districts excluding R-1 and R- 2. Ground-mounted solar energy systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height when oriented at maximum tilt. Appearance and operation of solar energy systems shall comply with the Chapter 20 Article VI of the City Code (property maintenance code). Ground-mounted solar energy systems are exempt from lot coverage and impervious surface requirements if the area under the system contains vegetative ground cover. (e) Roof-mounted solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. Residential roof- mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed two feet above the rooftop to which it is attached. Commercial, flat-roof-mounted solar energy systems cannot exceed four feet from the roof to which it is attached to. 11 The CITY of EDINA Add Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) considerations to City Code www.EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINAAdd EVSE Ordinance •Amends Utility and Landscape regulations to include EVSE •Adds EVSE as a Parking Reduction Strategy •Specifies applicability: excludes R-1 and R-2 •EVSE locations may not obstruct walkways or right-of-way sightlines •EVSE installation, maintenance and signage must follow relevant code •Provides basic definitions: EV, EVSE, Charging Levels www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINAEVs: Amend Utility Buildings & Structures 14 Section Current Language Updated Language Sec. 36- 1273. Utility Buildings and Structures Utility buildings and structures. (c) Utility poles and wires, water, gas, electric and mechanical equipment regulations. (1) If the footprint is 36 square feet in area or less, and six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be permitted at any location in a front, side or rear yard with no minimum setback from any property line. If utility or mechanical equipment is located within a city right-of-way, a permit is required. (2) If the footprint is larger than 36 square feet in area or six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. Utility and mechanical equipment that is grouped together and in the aggregate exceeds 36 square feet in area shall also be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. (4) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets in accordance with section 36-1459. Utility buildings and structures. (c) Utility poles and wires, water, gas, electric and mechanical equipment regulations. (1) If the footprint is 36 square feet in area or less, and six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be permitted at any location in a front, side or rear yard with no minimum setback from any property line. Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE) height is allowable to eight feet. If utility or mechanical equipment is located within a City right-of-way, a permit is required. (2) If the footprint is larger than 36 square feet in area or six feet in height, utility and/or mechanical equipment shall be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. Utility and mechanical equipment that is grouped together, excluding electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City, and in the aggregate exceeds 36 square feet in area shall also be required to meet all setback requirements in the underlying zoning district. EVSE with a height greater than eight feet must abide by these requirements. (4) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets, excluding EVSE owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City,in accordance with section 36-1459. The CITY of EDINAEVSE related mechanical equipment www.EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINAEVSE related mechanical equipment www.EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINA Section New Language Sec. 36-1324 - Parking Space Reductions (4) A five percent reduction in parking will be allowed if ten percent or more parking stalls are served by EVSE. Five percent of the parking stalls will be calculated before the reduction, rounded to the nearest whole number. 17 EVs: Amend Parking Space Reductions The CITY of EDINAEVSE Parking Regulations Section New Language Sec. 36-1326 - EVSE Parking Regulations (1) Applicability. (a) These regulations shall apply to the following zoning districts: a. Automobile Parking District b. Mixed Development District c. Planned Commercial District d. Planned Industrial District e. Planned Office District f. Planned Residence District g. Planned Unit Development h. Regional Medical District (b) Any EVSE installed before the date of adoption of these regulations will be assumed to be legal, non- conforming structures. (2) Type of EVSE. (a) Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 chargers are permitted as an accessory use in existing parking structures or parking lots in the abovementioned zoning districts. (b) An assembly of more than 24 EVSE adjacent to each other is prohibited on a single parcel. (c) The EVSE must incorporate a cord management system or method to eliminate potential for cable entanglement, user injury or connector damage from lying on the ground. 18 The CITY of EDINAEVSE Parking Regulations Section New Language Sec. 36-1326 - EVSE Parking Regulations (3) EV parking stall requirements. (a)Parking stalls with EVSE shall count towards off-street parking minimums required in the zoning code. (4) Location and Accessibility. (a)EVSE may not obstruct a sidewalk or walkway and must minimize trip and safety hazards. (b)EVSE must not interfere with the right-of-way sight lines. (c)EVSE and parking stalls served by EVSE shall follow Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. (5) Parking restrictions/requirements. (a)Parking stalls served by EVSE shall be reserved for EVs only. The developer or owner shall include signage and parking restrictions on the stalls to ensure availability and preference for EVs. 19 The CITY of EDINAEVSE Installation locations www.EdinaMN.gov 20 The CITY of EDINAEVSE Parking Regulations Section New Language Sec. 36-1326 - EVSE Parking Regulations (6) Design, installation, operations and maintenance. (a)EVSE shall be installed pursuant to manufacturer specification and shall comply with all applicable state building codes, state fire codes, state electrical codes, and relevant permitting processes. (b)EVSE shall be adequately maintained for safety and continual usage, following the property maintenance code. The area surrounding the EVSE shall be maintained appropriately to reduce hazards and allow access to EVSE, including snow removal around the equipment to allow for safety and access. (c)EVSE signage shall include a phone number to contact for regular maintenance issues and state to call 911 in case of an emergency. (d)EVSE signage may include wayfinding and usage instructions, but all other signage must meet the requirements of City Code Section 36-1655. Signs with a total area of over six square feet must follow the sign requirements of City Code Section 36-1655. 21 The CITY of EDINAEVSE Locations & Signage examples www.EdinaMN.gov 22 The CITY of EDINAEVSE Parking Regulations Section New Language Sec. 36-1326 - EVSE Parking Regulations (7) Definition of Terms (a) Electric Vehicle (EV): any vehicle that is licensed and registered for operation on public and private highways, roads, and streets; either partially or exclusively, on electrical energy from the grid, or an off-board source, that is stored on-board via a battery for motive purpose. “Electric vehicle” includes: (1) a battery electric vehicle; (2) a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. (b) Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE): provide electric power to the vehicle to recharge the vehicle's batteries. EVSE systems include the physical charger, software, and communications protocols that deliver energy efficiently and safely to the vehicle. EVSE does not include equipment located on the electric vehicles themselves. EVSE systems do not include mechanical or utility equipment related to delivering energy to the EVSE system and any connected EV, such as a transformer. (c) Charging Levels: the standardized indicators of electrical force or voltage, at which an electric vehicle’s battery is recharged. The terms 1,2, and 3 are the most common charging levels, and include the following specifications: (1) Level-1 is considered slow charging. It is considered 120V single phase EVSE. (2) Level-2 is considered medium charging. It is considered 208V/240V single phase AC EVSE. (3) Level-3 or DC Fast Charging is considered fast or rapid charging. It is considered AC 208V or 480V, 3 phase supply. 23 The CITY of EDINALevel 3 (DC Fast) Charger examples www.EdinaMN.gov 24 The CITY of EDINALevel 2 Charger examples www.EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY of EDINA Section Current Language New Language Sec. 36-1457 Screening (5) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets (5) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets, excluding EVSE owned by electrical utilities with an active franchise agreement with the City. 26 EVs: Amend Landscaping and Screening The CITY of EDINACorresponding Codes www.EdinaMN.gov 27 The CITY of EDINA Thank you! www.EdinaMN.gov 28 Date: April 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker, Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-23-06 6805 P aiute Dr . R etaining wall s etbac k variance request Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as submitted based on the findings as outlined in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: A 3-foot setback variance is requested for side yard setback from the 3-foot minimum requirement. T he variance requested is for replacement of a failing retaining wall on the east side of the property that is partially located on the neighbor ’s lot. T he proposal will remove the existing rotting wood retaining wall with a, (maximum), height of approximately 6 feet in some areas and relocate/rebuild the wall along the east lot line. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Engineering Memo Site Location Narrative and Plans Neighbor Email Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Pres entation April 26, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-23-06, for a 3 ft side setback variance for a retaining wall relocation along the east side lot line at 6805 Paiute Dr. Information / Background: NDR Landscape design build has submitted a 3-foot setback variance request for a retaining wall replacement along the east lot line with no setback. The variance requested is for replacement of a failing retaining wall on the east side of the property that is partially located on the neighbor’s lot. The proposal will remove the existing rotting, wood retaining wall and replace it with a new wall within the applicant’s property. A 3-foot setback is required for retaining walls more than 4 feet in height. Retaining walls 4 feet in height or less have no setback required, however, are subjected to maintenance access in R-1 and R-2 zoning districts as follows: Sec. 36-1257. - Drainage, retaining walls and site access. (b) Retaining walls. All retaining walls must be shown on a grading plan as part of a building permit application. Plans must demonstrate materials to be used for the retaining wall construction. Retaining walls taller than four feet must meet a three-foot setback. (c) Site access. In an R-1 or R-2 Zoning District, a residential maintenance access of at least three feet in width is required on one side of a single or two dwelling unit from the front yard to the rear yard. The new retaining wall will comply with the above-mentioned site access requirements. STAFF REPORT Page 2 Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 12,752 square foot lot is improved with a home built in 1967 and is located on the north side of Paiute Dr. The lot has a retaining wall located partially on the neighbor’s property. The existing retaining wall is rotting and needs replacement. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed retaining wall. An Engineering memo is attached. Compliance Table Principal Structure (retaining wall) City Standard Proposed East side setback - 3 feet *0 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and the new retaining wall complies with zoning standards except for the east side retaining wall setback requirement. Moving the wall onto the applicant’s property is a reasonable expectation that variance approval will accomplish. It allows a new 1’-6 feet in height wall that is similar in height range to existing to be relocated on the subject property. Access into the rear yard will not be compromised with the new wall placement. The affected neighbor supports removing the retaining wall and shifting it onto the subject property. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The new wall will be 4 feet in height or less for approximately half the length of the wall and will gradually increase in height to a little over 6 feet at it’s highest near the back corner. The applicant is hoping to correct the circumstance of encroachment on the neighbor that was not self-created or because of action on their part. Replacement is necessary due to wall failure with relocation needed to remove encroachment on the adjacent property. . 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. All other aspects conform to the ordinance requirements with exception of the wall replacement setback. Moving the wall location places it onto the subject property eliminating an existing nonconforming encroachment. Recommended Action: Staff supports the variance as requested for a side yard setback variance a 6805 Paiute Dr. for a retaining wall replacement. Staff believes there are unique circumstances to the subject property. Staff’s recommendation for approval of the requested variance is based on the following findings: • Variances must be based on the unique characteristics of a lot and challenges that are not self-created by the applicant. The original wall was not built by the current homeowner and is partially on the neighbor’s property. • Approving the variance, allows the wall to be correctly placed on the applicant’s property. • The proposed retaining wall varies in height with no more than ½ exceeding 4 feet in height. The wall conforms to all other zoning standards except for side yard setback of a portion of it. It will match the exception to setback for retaining walls 4 feet in height or less. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey/plans received date stamped March 30, 2023. 4. Engineering memo dated April 21, 2023. Deadline for a city decision, May 30, 2023. DATE: 4/21/2023 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Zuleyka Marquez, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 6805 Paiute Dr - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included an existing and proposed survey and engineering for the proposed retaining wall stamped 3/30/2023 Summary of Work The applicant proposes a replacement retaining wall not to exceed 6’ along the property line. The request is for a variance to the setback. Easements No comment. Grading, Drainage, Stormwater Mitigation The existing site drains to the street and through private property to Nine Mile Creek. Applicant to provide a proposed grading plan to confirm proposed patio expansion drains to the street and retaining wall engineer’s assumption that all surface drainage is directed away from the proposed wall. A final grade inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved grading plan. Floodplain Development No comment. Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance No comment. Miscellaneous A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit is not required, based on the correspondence with the district. Structure and watermain built/installed in 1967. A well is not likely located onsite. Thus, coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. Good day members of the board. I want to introduce you to Rich & Rene Cox, who has resided at 6805 Paiute Drive since 2008. They approached me last year with hopes to replace their rotting and failing timber retaining wall for structural, safety and aesthetic reasonings. The current wall has several areas of extreme rot and my team's professional opinion is that it needs to be replaces with a more durable product. Upon first assessment, the wall lies along the eastern property line, but after we obtained a licensed survey, it actually crosses over the property line by 6"-10". Our main objective is to propose building a new structurally sound retaining wall system using limestone cubes. We have already obtained an engineered drawing, as the wall exceeds 4' in height. The purpose of this variance application is to request that we can build the new wall along the property line without infringing on the neighbor's property. The material choice allows us to prevent further excavation that crosses the property line, as well as preserve the root system of a larger oak tree on the neighbor's property. If segmental retaining wall block was proposed, the needed excavation to meet the engineering requirements would greatly impact the neighbor's property, even in the event of this variance request being denied. If we were forced to abide by the current code of the 3ft setback from the rear of the wall, the result would permanently block equipment access into the back yard, as the other side of the house is impassable. All we are asking for is to move the wall mere inches, back to the Cox's property line, and to not infringe on the neighbor's property as well as to prevent damage to their large tree. Our proposal allows us to build this wall, per engineering specs, with zero-to-minimal excavation to prevent any sediment runoff and erosion during and after construction. Thank you for your time. CITY OF EDINA MAR 3 0 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT • I- k, --3/4111p - PLANNING DEPARTMENT _k_.• r.." z SHEET ii: I OF 1 T L-••••• I ••• IMPROVEMENT DETAIL on and that I am " N N N N \ \ N • , \ N • 90 \ \ \ \ \ N z / Go, 8891 SET GLS.01,903°4 7/ 18 / \ \ \ \ 88 \ N \ 9 688 04. 89° 089.0 ‘os,„ 8930 9. 6 4, 888.7 • 8959 2‘5 7 Ts C'4' 93 ......1.46VT \ N e99 ea. N --....... \ \ /0 4 %,, . . \ 1', k0 b%/405CAMG \-,-. \ \ °,'D 9.4 \ %, '' BB .4 13 1(089.]. \ ---- 888 CP ,.• ..../ 88 0 BEM 0 ' P 8813 1 .i 60 807 j4 I I 0 10 20 1}1900 sw 5 9012 ‘::L4 /r\ (14"4-',CE• \ekt 4 \ 9 592.7 i<NDS0,,„, \ \ ( „4„4.44 1396 90.04 N. '4 892. B9 \t SCALE IN FEET Beating shown hereon are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. Plat Scorings are localized to this Searing basis. Sze 891 \ • :9 888.94 918 '(21,3, 4 00 0,9 • 097.3 I 1--\ 'N • I I IF!! II II I I \ • .4 • A • / 1 I 1 I • 1 6 \ S N PtiVCc IGG 905 _71-N \ \ \ \ , 4.\ .....- ----- \,_ 89, 9 885 \ \ 1396 2-• ....!:1 N ..„ \ \ -,...„. \ 89,35\ ,. '' 90 \ \ \ ...... 9 ......... \ \ 5 \ \ \ sp. 2* h BBB 9 87.5 1386.9 C 92 8. 8883 88 9.1 00 8 87. 88 81 \ Fence ties are shown on the side of the boundary line that the fence is located on. 1387.6 89h„2 \ 1- 1 • 90 74 0 096 5 / 13137.6 90, „, 900 • 899.8 69, 890.8 8901 990. 8901 88 .8 \887. \ 887 4860 886 7 a / /8613 5 §. I / Bed, r 887.0 4 8870 BB da 8870 5 N 86, 'N 699 I - 2 97.3 90 %5 ' N \ \ \ \ \ \ :' • .1?...,... 696 - ',. • .....--; 893\ 87.1 4± A • 1/ L-•••• 1 1,, 984 Os izvo sivockoit 893 89 \ N N B9'3,4 B9 89 13S ‘9 _ 92 8 •.„ 91.g• \ N 887.1 1387.1 ---..„814,7.2 ,11. > 1313 8.0 939 CO \0 *:‘X\ \ 890 8 \ $ rs. 890.8 \ 97.3 (IA 90.7 90 8903 30,0 E17.5s /4- ,07.8 4 • 8903 'EP4n( LEGEND 896 " X 1186 B5 4P • eeeu PAVERS • CAST IRON MONUMENT 0 SURVEY MONUMENT SET • SURVEY MONUMENT FOUND A SURVEY CONTROL POINT <1 FLARED END SECTION VI GATE VALVE J., GUY YARE ▪ HYDRANT UGHT POLE 4 LANDSCAPE UGHT -0- POSER POLE 9.150 SANITARY MANHOLE 63 SANITARY CLEANOUT e STORM DRAIN - ROUND • STORM DRAIN - SQUARE • 0 STORM MANHOLE GIY- INVERT ELEVATION SIGN „9718 GROUND ELEVATION 00 0 A/C UNIT O VeELL WOE WALKOUT ELEVATION FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVAllON GFE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVAllON TOE TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEV. LOE LOWEST OPENING ELEV. COMM. PEDESTAL COMM. CONNECTION TRANS ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER el ELECTRIC MANHOLE el ELECTRIC METER et0 GAS MEIER GAS MANHOLE N GAS VALVE El HAND HOLE 45. sOIL BORING -11. TREE CONIFEROUS O WEE DECIDUOUS (i) TEIEPHONE MANHOLE III TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL • UGUrf MANHOLE • UllUTY PEDESTAL BITUMINOUS 87.1 7.9 „„, 886 8 8868 806 0 --8 7.1 887. 4.14 V. 65 I 400 886.9 / 7' \09 • 897.3 887 /A, 867.1 A9- 896 5 8903 ve CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 40 51 B855 i "5 I I 3.1 885 / / 77 ) 8B 89050 890 3 090 1390.4 1 1 / L_,, 1 26 9 93.7 885 9 EpSnRG PREPARED FOR: / 890 859:1 8903 4 8954 BM/ ▪ /-S N I / I I IA ▪ L _ I \ / 0 hp. 890 3 O1 .0 94.4 / „ I I I 892.9 1 \ T0 \ \ 13' • 893 6 1 1_ \ I 0 889 3 VV ELEV. ' /90.7 13139.3...„c CI 907 5 / 36.0 89 16 4 . 887.3 AZ.40sr :873 CME SURF rn / B9D 3 '26 O 0 VV ELEV. 8139 PAVERS 61 8961 886 !, 118k 2 , \ COG,. 866 887.4 0 8903 890 903 890 CORNER FALLS UNDER PARKED CAR \ L _ B7.3 \ 1387.3 • 8957 890 807 LANDSCAPING 84.4 90.7 8868 / 886 7 91. 4 Ai ( PAVERS 8.7i 7 BITUMINOUS 2 4) PARCEL LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 12, Block I, IROQUOIS HILLS, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota 885 890 890 3 AI A 8865 8871 8903 881.0 005.9 DA 87.01 8904 N 80 LANDSCAPING 805.7 \ *45 V885 • 5'8061 1 66.0 886 8 I I 886 5I 8865 1 1 -r!.1 B902 NOTES / GRG G AVERS 092 N ' NI 4 •„„, 884.7 / 1 • 879.1 / 1) Site Address, 6805 Paiute Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55439 2) Parcel Area Information: Gross Area: 12,752 al - 0.29 acres 3) Benchmark: Elevations are based on City of Edina Geodetic Station Number 278 which hait an elevation of 875.18 feet (NGVD29). Located at northwest corner of Sally Lane and Sioux Trail. 4) Zoning Information: The current Zoning for the subject property ia 11-1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) per the City of Edina's zoning map and ordinances.: • % X379.7 082 N \ 4P,to„ 1 mm 009 1389.9 CONCRETE 8900 • I t" I L _ S. -x-e- FENCE -BSBL- BUILDING SETBACK UNE - CONTOUR EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED GUARD RAIL -DT- DRAIN 11LE -ELC- ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND --CTV- COMMUNICATION UNDERGROUND -F0- ABER OPTIC UNDERGROUND -GAS- GAS UNDERGROUND -OHU- OVERHEAD UllUTY CL RAILROAD TRACKS • SANITARY SENER --co- STORM SEWER -TEL- TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND UliLITY UNDERGROUND - I - WATERMAIN CURBSTOP 1111111% Sip! 8 • 10/31/2022 Proposed Hardcover Calculations L _ 8:1,9 0BBb 0 :493 411.\1/2. OPEN \ BBB A\ • 0897 / \ / Vfi Principal Structure Setbacks - Street(id 30 feet Side: 10 feet Rear: 25 feet Side Unenclosed Decks/Patios: 5 feet Height: xx feet EXISTING HARDCOVER DATA eirt-744y ousi / 898 s.f. 654 s.f. 353 s.f 2,351 s.f. 27 al 4,283 s.f. Pavers: Bituminous: Flagstone: Structure: Wood Walls: Total: Hardower: xx percent of lot area • A Zoning Claasification Letter from the client must be provided to the surveyor. All zoning, setback information and hardcover information shown here on must be verified by all parties involved in the planning and design process for this project. We have not received the current zoning classification and building setback requirements from the insurer. / / mmh Hardcover %: 34% 1387.6 ID PROPOSED HARDCOVER DATA CITY OF EDINA MAR 3 0 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 51 Utilities: Underground utilities shown hereon are by observed evidence only. We have not placed a Gopher State One Call for this survey. There may or may not be undemmund utilities in the mapped area, therefore extreme caution must be exercise before any excavation takes place on or near this site. It is the dients responsibility to create a Gopher State One Call ticket. 898 of. 654 s.f. 109 s.f. 2,351 s.f. 505 sf. 363 s. f. 4,880 s.f. Pavers: Bituminous: Flagstone: Structure: New Patio: New Ret. Wall: Total, / Seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property 882.1 CALL 11013IE TOU Gopher State One Coil CITY ARE0•0131-01-0061 TOLL Ille:1-800-752-11114 •10., f:4 I lardcover %: 38.2% The Cox Residence x 363 x 70.3 IN3IALEIVc13C1 JNINN ad- ic:ZOZ VNICI3 JO ALTO 0 Eno x 50.9 EASING WALL 'PROPOSED GRADE 6 THE SAME AS EXISTNG GRADE LfIESTONE BOULDER WALL ZERO SOL EXCAVATION 'PROPOSED' GRADE 6 THE SAME AS EXISTING GRADE 'PROPOSED GRADE 6 THE SAME AS EXISTNG GRADE ZERO SOL EXCAVATION PATIO STARTS AT SFT SETBACK ZERO SOL DSTURBANCE PAST PROPERTY WE 'PROPOSED' GRADES THE SAME AS EXSTNG GRADE ZERO SOL EXCAVATON ZERO SOL DSTURBANCE EX1STNG WALL LANN &W+5 6 1-lakonechloo, Golden Voriegoted COMPOSITE STEPS 3 Nepeta, Walker's LOW EMSTNG BOULDERS ELECTRICAL WE MASONRY GRLL ISLAND 1 1111 111111 -aP x 33.5 x 418 tw .8 to PAST PROPERTY WE ZERO SOL EXCAVATION z TW+2 'PROPOSED' GRADE S THE SAME AS EX6ING GRADE ZERO SOL DSTURBANCE PAST PROPERTY WE 'PROPOSED' GRADE 5 THE SAME AS EX6ING GRADE ZERO SOL EXCAVATION ZERO SOL DSTURBANCE PAST PROPERTY WE 'PROPOSED GRADE S THE SAME AS EXIST NG GRADE ZERO SOL EXCAVATION 'PROPOSED' GRADE S THE SAME AS EXISTNG GRADE 8FT AC UNT HOUSE II x -233 \ -24 LWWN • ACCESS ROUTE x-23.5 -268hu x x-25.5 tw EROSION CONTROL SEDMENT LOG LAM SCHIMNOWSKI CRITERIUM® ENGINEERS CITY OF EDINA MAR 30 zon PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 15, 2022 Tim Gilligan NRD Landscape Design Build Submitted via email to: timnrdlandscape.com RE: Limestone Retaining Wall Typical Section Project Location: 6805 Pauite Dr., Edina, MN Project No. 22-6324 Dear Mr. Gilligan: This letter includes important details regarding the attached design for the typical engineered section of the limestone retaining wall at the above location. This design is based on wall layout information provided by you in an email dated May 26, 2022, including a site layout drawing prepared by NRD dated February 16, 2022. The attached typical section(s) should be referenced for construction details. Special note should be made of the wall embedment depth and the geosynthetic fabric (geogrid) length as measured from the front face of the wall if applicable. Refer to industry standard practice references for installation information, specifications, and details. - Stones shall be placed to avoid continuous joint planes in vertical directions. - Each stone shall bear on two or more stones below it with good flat-to-flat contact. - Compact any structural fill place behind the drainage zone to 95% standard proctor. - Install non-woven landscape fabric behind the stone to limit soil migration through the wall face. Drainage stone shall consist of clean 3/4" to 1.5" crushed stone The design of the wall system is specific to the following parameters: • Location: East side of house along property line • Maximum exposed height: 6-feet, maximum exposed height • Minimum embedment depth = 6", or as noted • Soil conditions: Silty/clayey sand, friction angle = 30.0 degrees, unit weight of 120.0 lb/ft3 • Required soil bearing capacity = 1,500 psf • Surcharge load behind the wall: None • 10:1 slope at top and bottom of wall • Stone sizes: see cross section drawing • Geosynthetic Reinforcement Fabric Type: Not required • Drainage pipe: Required This wall system has not been designed for ground water surcharge loads. Direct all surface drainage away from the wall. Methods to do so include but are not limited to the following: drainage swale, site grading, retention ponds, etc. Details of water control are left to the wall contractor. Additional information requested by Criterium-Schimnowski Engineers but not available includes: geotechnical site survey and soil data. Please contact Criterium-Schimnowski to provide additional site assessment services if desired. Independently Owned and Operated 161 Dunbar Way / Mahtomedi, MN 55115 0: 651.779.7700 / criterium-schimnowski.com CITY OF EDINA MAR 3 0 2023 6805 Pauite Drive, Edina, MN PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 15, 2022 Page I 2 The wall design was performed using the design guidelines presented in the third edition of the "Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls" (DMSRW) published by NCMA in 2009. If soil conditions, proposed wall layouts, or any other design parameters vary from those stated above, contact me for a revised design. Please call me if you have any questions or need more information. Thank you. This design has been prepared in strict confidence with you as our client. Reliance upon our design by other parties is strictly prohibited. If you choose to share the design, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Engineer from any third-party action. No reproduction or re-use is permitted without express written consent. Further, we will not release this design to anyone without your permission. Please call with any additional questions you may have. Thank you for the opportunity to be of assistance to you. Sincerely, I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Paul Schimnowski, P.E. MN #40126 Paul Schimnowski, P.E. Date: June 15, 2022 License #: 40126 (MN) Independently Owned and Operated 161 Dunbar Way / Mahtomedi, MN 55115 0: 651.779.7700 / criterium-schimnowski.com 161 DUNBAR WAY MAHTOMEDI, MN 55115 PHONE: 651.779.7700 FAX: 651.779.7114 pschimno@criterium-schimnowski.com SOIL VALUES USED IN THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT TYPE OF SOIL FRICTION ANGLE (DEGREES) UNIT WEIGHT (lb/ft-3) REINFORCED BACKFILL --- --- RETAINED BACKFILL 30 120 FOUNDATION SOIL 30 120 CROSS SECTION DESIGN BASED ON INFORMATION LISTED IN COVER UD-TER. ACTUAL NUMBER OF COURSES MAY VARY 6" MIN. EMBEDMENT / \ 111 ---1111 I I I I-I I I-I I LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL I ATYPICAL CROSS SECTION WI j(NOT TO SCALE) BACKFILL COMPACTED 95% OF MAXIMUM STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 4" DIAMETER DRAINTILE OUTLET 40' ON-CENTER, MIN. 16k D SCMtritt. I CITY OF EDINA MAR 3 0 2023 PLANNING DEPARTMENT c• • -,:t0 kffAtk6 11011 11{01 11 111 JAL F.NOINEER * 6. 40 1 2 d * do. • A LOW PERMEABILITY SOIL 6" DEEP \\/Y 12" FREE DRAINING 3/4" AGGREGATE HEAVY NON-WOVEN FILTER FABRIC BEHIND STONE 6-FT, MAX. Designed By: PDS PROJECT NAME/ LOCATION Date: 6/15/2022 Checked By: PDS Scale! AS NOTED CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS CLIENT: TIM GILLIGAN NRD LANDSCAPE DESIGN BUILD PHONE: 952-212-2665 Project No' 22-6324 Drawing Name' 6-FT WALL SECTION LIMESTONE BLOCKS MINIMUM DIMENSIONS: 14" HIGH, 18" DEEP, 20" LONG SETBACK I INCH MINIMUM PER COURSE 6805 PAUITE DRIVE / EDINA, MINNESOTA 9/22/22, 3:03 PM Gmail - 6805 Paiute Dr IfrI Gmail Tim Gilligan <tgilligan.nrd@gmail.com> 6805 Paiute Dr 1 message Lauren Foley <LFoley@ninemilecreek.org> Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 2:54 PM To: "tim@nrdlandscape.com" <tim@nrdlandscape.com> Cc: "Zuleyka Marquez (ZMarquez@EdinaMN.gov)" <zmarquez@edinamn.gov> Hi Tim, We have reviewed the retaining wall replacement proposed at 6805 Paiute Dr in Edina and determined that it does not need a watershed permit. Best of luck with project! Lauren Foley I Permitting & Policy Manager I Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 12800 Gerard Drive I Eden Prairie, MN 55346 I 952-204-9690 CITY OF EDINA MAR 3 0 2023 www.ninemilecreek.org I Subscribe to our e-newsletter! PLANNING DEPARTMENT https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=fe64ce56f5&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1741892442285308945&simpl=rnsg-f%3A17418924... 1/1 !" # $ % &'( ) * * !" # + ,--%. .+%-$/%. '.+' ( / 0( ( / 0( EdinaMN.gov A setback variance for a retaining wall relocation 6805 Paiute Dr 6805 Paiute Date: April 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:S ketch P lan R eview - 5100 Eden Avenue Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. P rovide the applicant non-binding feedback on a potential future land use request. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he P lanning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan review of redevelopment proposal made by the O pus G roup to redevelop 5100 Eden Avenue. T he applicant is proposing to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to build a seven story 138-unit apartment. Ten percent of the units (14) would be provided for affordable housing of households making no more that 50% of the area median income. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Memo - April 26, 2023 Proposed Plans and Narrative Site Location, Zoning, & Comp. Plan & Development Framework & Trans p. Plan Grandview Development Framework - Full Document Grandview Trans portation Study Part 1 Grandview Trans portation Study Part 2 Staff Pres entation Applicant Pres entation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: April 26, 2023 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 5100 Eden Avenue The Opus Group is requesting consideration of a Sketch Plan to redevelop 5100 Eden Avenue. The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to build a seven story 138-unit apartment. Ten percent of the units (14) would be provided for affordable housing of households making no more that 50% of the area median income. The applicant is proposing the following for formal approval: A Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The PUD would ensure that the affordable housing is included within the project. Flexibility in the underlying POD standards includes building height, setbacks on all sides, floor area ratio and building coverage. The table on the last page of this report demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the existing POD-1 Standards on the lot. As with all sketch plan reviews; the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus for the discussion should be on the following: Proposed land use Proposed height Proposed setbacks PUD criteria Grandview Development Framework and Guiding Principles. The applicant has specifically responded to the Grandview District’s 7 Guiding Principles within their narrative. (See attached plans and narrative.) The following page is a list of the 7 Guiding Principles with the applicant response: City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Issues/considerations for discussion: Density. The residential density proposed is on the highest end of the density range within the Comprehensive Plan. The density is 100 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan would allow 20 to 100 units at this site. Grandview Development Framework. The existing site is small at 1.38 acres. As demonstrated in the Grandview Development Framework, this site was anticipated for low rise row type housing with taller buildings closer to the highway. (See pages 4-7 in the attached “Site Location, Zoning, Comp. Plan and Framework.) The proposed plan does not follow that framework and proposes one building on the site. The massing of the building however is more toward Highway 100, away from Arcadia. Grandview Transportation Plan. Boulevard style sidewalks are proposed along the south and west lot lines per the Plan. The round-a-bout planned for the intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue has been installed. A new frontage road is planned along Highway 100. This project would not impact that road, as it is within the existing Highway 100 right-of-way. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Building Setbacks. Flexibility would be needed through a PUD from the required setbacks. (See the proposed setbacks in the attached site plans.) The setbacks proposed along Eden Avenue appear extreme at 4-15 feet. However, the right-of-way in that area is large; setbacks to the curb range from 33-45 feet. Setbacks on Arcadia are not as tight, ranging from 5-40 feet. The 5-foot area is a small portion of the building. Traffic and Parking. A traffic study will be required to determine impacts on adjacent roadways. Parking would be underneath the building and code compliant. Affordable Housing. The applicant proposes to provide 10% of the units within the development to meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Proposed height. The proposed height of 7 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. As a comparison, the height of the Maison Green development is 7 stories and 76 feet and the Loden is 6 stories and 80 feet tall. Sustainability. The applicant will be required to meet the City’s Sustainability Policy. The proposed plans would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The proposal is to rezone the site to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Staff has concern that the project as proposed may not meet “most” of the purpose and intent statements of a PUD as outlined below. PUD Per Sec. 36-253 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance, the purpose and intent of a PUD is as follows: The purpose of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the city council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning. Note that flexibility would be requested from the underlying zoning standards through the POD-1: Compliance Table (Not exact as this is a sketch plan) City Standard (PID) Comp. Plan Proposed Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – North Rear – East 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 4-15 feet lot line & 33-45 feet curb* 5-40 feet lot line & 25-48 feet curb* 4 feet* 4 feet* Density 20-100 units/acre 100 units per acre Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories* Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30% .50% 69%* 3.0%* Parking Stalls – Residential 1.25 units per unit = 172 spaces 175 spaces *Requires flexibility through a PUD Ordinance City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Eden 100 Multi-Family March 24th 2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Sketch Plan Submittal Sketch Plan Submittal Contents Project Overview • Project Narrative • Site Overview • Development Data • Project Summary • Project Metrics • Project Team • Grandview District Framework Review • Current Zoning • Site Views • Site Images • Adjacent Spaces • Regional Amenities • Illustrative Site Plan • Amenity Plan • Floor Plans • Grading Plan • Utility Plan • Contextual Images • Perspective Images • Materials and Massing Images • Interior Amenity Spaces • Exterior Amenity Spaces Project Context Proposed Project Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Contents Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Overview Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Project Overview and Design Narrative Project Introduction Opus is pleased to share our sketch plan submittal with the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council. The package includes visioning and conceptual design for the exciting new redevelopment opportunity at 5100 Eden Avenue. The proposed project will play a major role in the City’s future goals for the Grandview neighborhood. Opus is proposing a 138-unit multifamily project that activates the boulevard along Arcadia Avenue and maximizes the site’s full potential. In addition to providing luxury homes for future residents, the project will feature a class A amenity package with indoor parking, a bike valet, fitness, a work from home area and an expansive outdoor amenity space complete with a spa. Along with the building amenities for residents to enjoy, the public will benefit from the improved connection along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The building frontage along Arcadia Avenue will feature an improved drive lane, new parallel parking stalls, a grassy boulevard, and a new and improved sidewalk for patrons. The newly constructed sidewalk will connect the neighborhood to nearby amenities in what is now an underutilized pedestrian area. Our team thoughtfully designed the building’s presence along this prominent avenue to synergize with the Grandview Project at 5146 Eden Avenue. The pedestrian experience along Eden Avenue will also be improved with lush, terraced landscaping between the sidewalk and the building. This site is an important puzzle piece to the overall goals for the Grandview District and we are excited to share our team’s vision. Site Overview 5100 Eden Avenue is made up of seven adjacent parcels totaling 1.38 acres on the northeast quadrant of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There is an existing 38,678 SF office building on the site that was built in 1968. The current tenants are on short term leases or include rights to remove with notice. Office space is not as desirable as it once was, and the existing building is not in alignment with the City’s vision for the site. The site is currently zoned Planned Office District-1 and will seek to be rezoned as a Planned Unit Development to allow the project to maximize its full potential. Development Data The proposed building will be seven stories in height, with the lowest level only partially exposed along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There are two levels of enclosed parking in a precast structure containing a total of 171 parking stalls, and five stories of wood frame construction above. There will be three access points, with one being off Eden Avenue and two off Arcadia Avenue. The main entrance will be off Arcadia Avenue and will have four visitor parking stalls alongside a generous green space lawn to create a welcoming environment for the project within the neighborhood. The total building will be approximately 244,000 gross square feet and will feature 138 dwelling units with 10% of the units affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The project will consist of a full amenity package, thoughtfully designed for the desires of future residents. An active lobby along Arcadia Avenue will have work from home spaces, a fitness space, and yoga room. There will also be a bike valet along with a dog wash and dog run. A second story amenity deck will have a spa, a turf area, and a grill area with seating. The sixth-floor amenity deck will provide additional space for resident enjoyment with dynamic views to City Hall and downtown Minneapolis. The site has approximately 16 feet of grade change from the Northwest corner to the Southwest corner, making this a challenging site. Opus has worked hard to mitigate these challenges and provide a vibrant project that responds to the district goals, the pedestrian experience, and the site forces, all the while maintaining a viable project. The exterior design will feature high class building materials such as high quality masonry, architectural wall cladding, architectural metal panels, generous glass, and plentiful balconies, all within a building form that respects and responds to the neighborhood. The building opens up toward Arcadia Avenue with an expansive front entry and exterior amenity package providing an enhanced pedestrian experience. The relief provided along this street responds well to the proposed development at the old Public Works site, and the two developments will provide a much-needed enhancement to Arcadia Avenue. The corners of the building anchor the structure to the site, but the design thoughtfully pulls back the mass in the middle. This is evident especially along Arcadia Avenue but also along Eden Avenue. The step-backs provide visual interest and relief for the public as they walk or drive by the site. Lush landscaping and terraced walls relieve some of the challenging topography, adding to the pedestrian experience. In addition, programming has been thoughtfully placed to activate the streetscape. Sustainability is a core tenant of Opus’s mission statement and will be incorporated into the design and execution of the project at every step. We intend to meet or exceed the requirements put forth by the city. Because of the small site size and healthy slope present, the development team is asking for relief on setbacks and height. Our goal is to work with the city on crafting a PUD that allows the project to move forward with the intent shown herein. Summary Opus is excited for the opportunity to be a part of the community’s overall vision for the Grandview neighborhood. In collaboration with our consultants and feedback from City staff, we believe the following package encapsulates the community’s desired outcome for the site. We look forward to working alongside the City of Edina and its stakeholders to drive this vision forward and build upon the city’s goals for this growing neighborhood. Project Overview and Narrative Applicant / Developer Architect Design Builder Opus Development Company 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus Design Build 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Civil Engineer Landscape Architect Sambatek 12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763-476-6010 Damon Farber 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612-332-7522 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Metrics Project Metrics Project Team Amenity/ Common Table 1 - Project Summary Lobby Area Notes: Level 6 A, R 31,042 31,042 891 25,164 650 3,728 2 4 11 17 Total Apartment GSF 181,201 Level 5 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Garage GSF 62,282 Level 4 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Project GSF 243,483 Level 3 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Level 2 A, R 31,987 31,987 1,245 23,821 2,566 3,728 3 16 8 1 28 Level 2 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 5,998 Level 1 A, L, P 41,550 20,876 20,673 1,082 5,615 8,687 4,884 1 2 3 52 8 Level 2 Private Patios 3,217 Level P1 P 42,946 41,406 1,540 528 982 111 Level 6 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 735 Total 243,483 62,282 181,201 6,419 134,820 11,903 24,506 12 72 37 17 138 163 8 Table 2 - Apartment Summary * Total GSF Includes Additional 2% Applied for Depth of Exterior Finish 9% 52% 27% 12% 100%Notes: ** Apt RSF Based on Exterior Face of Sheathing Goal Mix 10% 50% 40% 0% 100%Total Units 138 Typ. Floor Efficiency 84% (Rental SF / Gross SF) Total Stalls 171 P - Parking Parking Stall / Unit Ratio 1.24 R - Residential Levels Use Total GSF Garage GSF*Apt GSF* Shaft Apt RSF**Studio 1 BED 2 BED 2+ BED Units Parking L - Lobby Tandem Parking NOTE: Total parking excludes 4 visitor parking stalls. A - Amenity Proposed Mix Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Context Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Leverage publicly owned parcels Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. This project, while not leveraging publicly-owned parcels, will create a presence within the community and enhance the vibrancy and connectedness that is so desired in today’s urban cores. The project responds to the future bike/pedestrian path connecting to City Hall and the park to the west, as well as enhances the pedestrian experience through thoughtful landscaping and site terracing. Meet the needs of businesses and residents Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. The District currently houses many different types of businesses, goods and services. The proposed development at the corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue will build upon the economic vitality of the district by adding residents at the heart of this mix. This project will build upon a direct synergy between businesses and residents that is just now growing in the district. The project is designed to respond to a future proposed pedestrian/bike bridge connecting City Hall to the development to the west and Jerry’s ramp. The opportunity for multi-modal movement within the district will be enhanced with the proposed project and adjacencies, and will allow this project - and the district - to adapt and respond to the future. Turn barriers into opportunities Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The site currently has a healthy slope from the North side down to the Southwest corner, and is bordered by Hwy 100 on the east and an on-ramp spur to the north. We utilize the elements to our advantage with our proposed project by partially burying the lowest level within the site and exposing the level only when necessary for access. The highway provides unobstructed open space next to the site which will allow for expansive views from the residential units. Grandview District Review 6 on since ow well pation, rs, sions usiness ted be result hange, that will p, and Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. The proposed project will include an affordable housing aspect to meet the needs of residents within the district. An enhanced pedestrian experience is at the heart of the building siting, location and design addressing the ever growing multi-nodal transportation experience that is so relevant in today’s cities. A bike valet is also included on the north side of the project in anticipation of a connective corridor from city hall, across highway 100, to the new park on the west side of the Arcadia Avenue. All this meets the current and future goals of the Grandview District becoming an urban node where one can live, work, and play. Organize parking; provide convenience Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. Our parking is provided fully on site for both residents and guests. All residents will have indoor parking within the building, while spaces dedicated for future tenants are provided at the front entry. Along with resident, guest, and future tenant parking, we are proposing public, on-street parking along the west side of our site to serve the local shops and services. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The pedestrian experience along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue have been greatly enhanced through thoughtful building placement and massing. In addition, landscaping and land terracing is enhanced to provide relief and reprieve for those using public sidewalks. Additional parking is proposed to alleviate congestion, and the future bike/pedestrian trail is considered in our design. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The project will feature a Class A amenity package and experience for the residents who live there. Beautifully articulated design and high class materials will present the project as a destination within the district. Sustainability is one of Opus’s core values and will be infused in the project from the beginning. Finally, the pedestrian experience in the public realm will be greatly enhanced. Grandview District Guiding Principles Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review 374/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West Vernon A v e Eden A v e Hwy 100 Figure 3.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan showing Focus Areas throughout the Grandview District and beyond. CHAPTER IntroductionFocus Areas 3 City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST INTERLACHEN BLVD 50T H S T 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 11 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 (12) (12) 164/05/12 Land Use Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 15 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100ercial Residential 154/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Offi ce Medium/High Density Residential 274/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Public Realm A. GrandView Commons B. GrandView Steps C. GrandView Crossing D. Arcadia Streetscape E. Gus Young Streetscape F. Arcade Connection G. Vernon Streetscape H. Eden Streetscape A B C D F H H G E Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St 51st St Public Realm / Open Space Diagram 424/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Bicycle Improvements Transportation Primary bike routes Secondary bike routes Trail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of- way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 384/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Parking • Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/ practical. • Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district. • Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply. Parking beneath buildings New access to existing Surface lots Existing ramp Direction of traffi cVernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100P P Enhance the pedestrian experience Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontage Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontageOriginally thought of as Mixed Use Bike Routes are a key component to the neighborhood Parking should be hidden as best as possible Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Current Zoning ©LOGIS 2013, Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCR Current Zoning Class The site is currently zoned POD-1 Planned Office given its current use. The intent is to rezone the site to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and establish specific zoning language for the proposed project. Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 Districts R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 3/22/2023, 12:54:36 PM 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 g Unit ng Unit esidence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 sidence mmercial mmercial ice PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 | Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Existing Site Images From Corner From Sidewalk From Parking Lot From Parking Lot From Southeast Parking Lot Entrance From Sidewalk From Sidewalk From Northwest Lot Corner GrandviewYard 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 SHEET 38 RENDERING #1 RESTAURANT AERIAL FROM SOUTHWEST COVER SHEETGRANDVIEW YARDRESTAURANTSENIOR COOPERATIVEAERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST*NOTE: RENDERINGS ARE STYLIZED ILLUSTRATIONS. REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN ELEMENTS. RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Adjacent Spaces Our Lady of Grace Edina OffiCenter The Hilltop Restaurant Retail Center Proposed Restaurant Proposed Senior Coop 4917 Eden Avenue Multi-Family Edina City Hall Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Regional Amenities Local Amenities Medical Facilities Grocery and Convenience Stores Postal Services Educational Institutions Edina Cahill Historical School Our Lady of Grace Catholic School Highlands Elementary School Civic Facilities Edina City Hall Edina Police Department Edina Hennepin County Library Funeral Home Religious Institution Parks and Recreational Areas Edina Parks Recreation Edina Country Club Utley Park Wooddale Park Arden Park Arden Park Rink Todd Park Highlands Park Garden Park Browndale Park Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Proposed Project Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Illustrative Site Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Level 2 Amenity Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Lower Level Garage and Parking Floor Plan Legend Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 1 Garage and Parking 5’ 5’ 7’ 11’ Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 2 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 3-5 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 6 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grading Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Utility Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Contextual Views Northwest Perspective Southwest Perspective Northeast Perspective Southeast Perspective Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views West Perspective View South Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views East Perspective View North Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Building Materials and Massing Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Exterior Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Interior Amenities Site Site Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 27 4/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape GrandView District Development FrameworkEdina, MinnesotaDecember 7, 2011Revised January 17, 2012Revised January 25, 2012Revised January 31, 2012Revised March 27, 2012Revised April 5, 2012 24/05/12Ken Potts Kim Melin Randy Halvorson Chris Rofi dal Steve Buss Gene Persha Richard Borland Larry Chestler Laura Giertsen Ellen Jones Terry Ahlstrum Dick Ward Bill Neuendorf Tim McIlwain Bright Dornblaser Andy Brown Suzanne Davison Greg Domke Sandy Fox Dick Crockett Arne Cook Tom Bonneville Kim Montgomery Tim Murphy Th omas RaeuchleTom RuppertPeter Sussman Lisa Diehl Bob Kojetin David Davison Bernie Beaver Mike Platteter Peyton Robb Dan Gieseke Diane Reinhart James Justice Darcy Winter Paul Nelson David Novak Linda Urban Tom Mattison Ken and Adele Floren Michael Schroeder Jim SmithKevin Staunton, ChairMichael Fischer Brett Johnson Collin Bredeson Deron Lindquist Eric Bredesen Jim BaischSteering CommitteeConsultant TeamCuningham Group Architecture, PAClose Landscape ArchitectureHR GreenCommunity Design GroupSpringsted Inc.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 31. Hope for Change 52. Thoughts and Interactions 63. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 94. Moving Forward with a Purpose 455. Appendix 57 34/05/122. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure to:• Make the District accessible and inviting to pedestrians and cyclists;• Create connections between the diff erent parts of the District;• Maintain automobile-friendly access to convenience retail; • Create separate pathways for “pass-through” and “destination” automobile traffi c; and• Preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor in a way that ensures that the kinds of opportunities pursued in the future are consistent with the character we envision for the District and provide benefi t to the surrounding neighborhood.3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-creating changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voluntary private redevelopment consistent with the vision that improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Th is Development Framework makes substantial progress in charting the path to be followed in redeveloping the GrandView District. By creating a vision that meets the seven Guiding Principles, it provides guidance to city offi cials, residents, business and property owners, and developers as opportunities for change emerge in the District. To ensure that the future redevelopment of the District is consistent with the vision articulated in this Framework, we recommend that it become part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.Executive SummaryTh e Development Framework presented here is part of a small area planning process required by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan for those parts of our community (like the GrandView District) designated as Potential Areas of Change. It follows the 2010 GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan process. Th at process – led by a group of community residents and business and property owners – resulted in adoption by the Edina City Council of seven Guiding Principles for the redevelopment of the GrandView District.Th e process of crafting this Development Framework has been led by a 52-member Steering Committee made up of residents of the community and owners of area businesses and properties. Th e 52 members of the Steering Committee have dedicated countless hours since April of 2011 listening to community members, considering options, and debating alternatives for the future of the District. Th anks to a grant from the Metropolitan Council, we have had the good fortune to be supported in our eff orts by a talented group of consulting experts. We have also been fortunate to have the patient support of City staff throughout the process.Our objective in creating this Development Framework is to build upon the seven Guiding Principles adopted by the City Council. In the pages that follow, we share a vision of how to bring those Guiding Principles to life. While there are many details essential to fulfi lling that vision, our goals can be summarized as eff orts to:1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements like:• A central commons on the Public Works site with indoor and outdoor public space that connects the civic cornerstones of the District and serves the neighborhood and community needs;• A “gateway” at Highway 100 that announces the District as a special place, using elements like an iconic pedestrian and bicycle bridge spanning Highway 100; and• An innovative, cutting-edge approach to 21st-century sustainability. 44/05/12We want to be clear, however, that we recognize that the Framework (like the Comprehensive Plan) provides broad direction rather than detailed requirements. Th is Framework is intended to be a vision of the future rather than a blueprint. Achieving the vision will require, among other things:• A feasibility study that examines the costs and resources available to bear those costs;• An examination of the height and density necessary to make the vision fi nancially feasible while ensuring that it results in the human scale and neighborhood character that is the essential to the Framework;• Developing a strategy to allow for a vibrant business and residential community by managing the mix of retail, offi ce, residential, and public uses of land while maintaining the currently successful neighborhood service and convenience character;• A determination of a range of possible housing choices that support the character and experience of the District.• A community building/public green programming group should work to determine appropriate program and uses.We discuss these and other “next steps” in the Implementation section. Consistent with the “community-led” spirit of the initial stages of this process, we recommend that these “next steps” include active participation by community members, support of staff , and leadership from the City Council. Study Area Location 4/05/121. Hope for Change 64/05/121. Hope for ChangeIntroductionHope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration, participation, and planning. Th ousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small) have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders, business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed offi cials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. Th e result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy, policy, and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable, memorable ways.Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 74/05/121. Hope for Change1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development.2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business.3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area.4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-fi lled place.5. Organize parking as an eff ective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor.7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development refl ecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.The Seven Guiding PrinciplesGuiding PrinciplesPrinciples Related to the Concept Diagram1. Leverage publicly owned parcels2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents3. Turn barriers into opportunities4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive5. Organize parking; provide convenience6. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement7. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative161226374457 84/05/121. Hope for ChangeHistoryBefore Edina became a village almost 125 years ago, a country market road crossed Minnehaha Creek at Edina Mills. Headed westward to the high ground, it branched out as Eden Prairie Road and Hopkins Road. In 1869, the Yancey family moved from Ohio and purchased 127 acres of land including that high ground and most of the present GrandView District. Civil War veteran Beverly C., his wife Ellen and their seven children were to become the most prominent pioneer black family of Edina over several decades and left a legacy of civic involvement. An observer described early Edina as an agricultural village, “where there is a post offi ce, a mill, and a store, and proudly aspires to the dignity of a trading town. Th e numerous farms are well-cultivated, and are occupied by intelligent people who appreciate education, and surround themselves with the accessories of a refi ned society.”A center of the early community was Minnehaha Grange No. 398, organized in 1873. Th e Grange Hall originated in a meeting at the Yancey family home in 1879 with a “considerable number of persons desirous to form an association to build and own a hall building near Edina Mills.” In 1888, the name Edina was voted upon in that building, which also served as the village hall until 1942. When moved for construction of St. Stephen’s Church in 1935, a member of the Yancey family donated the new site. In 1970, the Grange Hall was moved to the present Frank Tupa Park in the GrandView District, later joined by the historic Cahill School.Changes in the district have been ongoing including transportation and services. Members of the Yancey family platted Grand View Heights in 1910 and Tingdale Brother’s Brookside in 1916. In 1913, the Dan Patch Line was cut through the high ground east of Brookside Avenue, providing passenger service to Minneapolis from 1915 to 1942. In 1927, new highway 169/212 (current Vernon Avenue) was cut through the District. Grading and paving businesses such as J. A. Danens and Son located to serve the growth, joined by motels and restaurants. Th e District expanded rapidly with western Edina following World War II. Th e Edina directory of 1953 listed six of ten businesses in the District as including “Grandview” in their names: a cafe, market, two service station, hardware, and seed Sources: 1. R. J. Baldwin, in Isaac Atwater, History of Minneapolis and Hennepin County (Munsell, 1895), p. 1263 as quoted in Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: Th e History of Edina, Minnesota (Burgess Publishing,1998) Edina Historical Society, p. 29.2. Meeting minutes dated March 7, 1879. Copy in the Edina Historical Society fi les.Historic GrandView Heights Platand garden supply store. In 1947, Jerry Paulsen opened a meat counter in one of the local groceries, a modest beginning to Jerry’s Enterprises, a longtime prominent presence in the District.It is encouraged to look to the history of the District in naming the proposed public amenities and new streets. Th e Yancey family in particular, due to their early ownership of the District and legacy of civic engagement, merits that honor at a prominent location such as the commons. 4/05/122. Thoughts and Interactions 104/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsProject Schedule and ProcessSeptOctNovDecPart IDiscussion and DiscoveryCommunity Workshop #1Part IIIdeas and OptionsCommunity Workshop #2Part IIIDecide and DeliverCommunity Workshop #3DeliverablesProject/Community Meetings SeptOctNovDecSteering CommitteeStaff CoordinationExecutive Team MeetingCommunity WorkshopWork Group MeetingsPlan Commission/CouncilProject Update#1 #2#3Part I: Discussion and DiscoveryPart I is about learning from and listening to the Steering Committee, Work Groups, and other stakeholders; analyzing the study area and understanding the work done to-date; appreciating the larger dynamics of the area; and clearly defi ning the opportunities. An initial Community Workshop is held to conduct work group discussions/downloads, and a public meeting/presentation is hosted by the Steering Committee and the Consulting Team. Part II: Ideas and OptionsPart II focuses on developing ideas and options that address the specifi c issues raised by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, and the public process. The Consulting Team conducts a three-day Community Workshop (to be held in the study area) that will include Steering Committee meetings, focus group meetings, stakeholder interviews, team work sessions, and conclude with a public meeting/presentation.Part III: Decide and DeliverPart III consolidates all the comments, ideas, and options into a preferred direction. This part includes a third Community Workshop and public meeting. The Consulting Team prepares a summary document that may be widely distributed via a variety of sources (i.e., print, web, etc.) and a Sketch-up 3D model of the area with preferred options.Project Schedule: Th e project schedule was organized around three community workshops. 11Th e Steering Committee and Executive Committee have worked closely with the Consulting Team to facilitate a process that focused on key issues, opportunities, and recommendations. Th e process worked with the Steering Committee that met on a regular basis to guide the Consulting Team. A sub-committee of Work Groups addressed Land Use/Community Design, Community Needs/Public Realm, Transportation/Infrastructure and Real Estate/Finance. Th ese groups put an incredible amount of eff ort into initial background information and research, defi nition of issues, and discussion about ideas and options. A key component of the project was a series of Community Workshops held in September, October and November, 2011, that hosted a range of community stakeholders either in interviews, focus groups, program meetings and at public meetings.Th e community participation process included these primary groups of participants: Steering Committee, Executive Committee, work groups, City staff , focus groups (land owners, neighborhoods, public offi cials, schooldistrict, institutions, city departments, business operators, and others as identifi ed during the process), Plan Commission members, City Council members and the Mayor.4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsSummary of Participation ProcessThe Public Participation Process: Th e public participation process included Steering Committee meetings, work group meetings, public meetings, focus groups meetings, and program groups meetings throughout the fall of 2011. 4/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 134/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterConcept DiagramsIntroduction Create “go to” and “stay at” usesConnect throughoutEasy to get to; easy to get aroundPrinciple #2 in the GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan is about “enhanc(ing) the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections.”Th e Guide Plan also suggests that “Th e District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center.” Based on Steering Committee and Public input, this idea has broad appeal. But what do we mean by neighborhood center and how does that fi t with specifi c expectations and outcomes for the GrandView District?“Neighborhood feel,” “pedestrian friendly,” and “safe and connected” describe the desired character for the District. But the basis for these words lies in a clear vision for the key elements, or systems, that defi ne place...and further set the framework for future and ongoing development at GrandView. Th ese elements include Land Use, Transportation and Movement, the Public Realm and Sustainability, and will be described and illustrated in more detail in this chapter.Neighborhood Center 144/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and offi ce buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fi elds, a signifi cant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district.Vernon is assumed to remain more convenience-and service-oriented with improved pedestrian sidewalks/connections, safer street crossings (especially to the adjacent neighborhood), bike lanes, and better organized/managed traffi c fl ow and parking. Both Eden and Vernon are anticipated to employ Complete/Living Street principles that emphasize the place-qualities of streets.Across Highway 100 to the east, the Vernon/50th/Eden alignment culminates with City Hall; long term uses are assumed to accommodate a greater civic/community presence when/if the Highway 100 interchange is reconfi gured as a split-diamond facility.Goals• Develop and improve the district as three smaller “villages” that are connected physically and by a signature character and identity.• Recognize the need for a range of housing types and choices and address those markets that also reinforce the District vision.Land UseLand use in the District is currently focused on convenience retail and service uses that are visible from Vernon Avenue. Th e majority of these uses are auto-oriented and are accessible from Vernon and Gus Young Lane. Th e exception is the GrandView Square development that includes residential, offi ce, and civic uses organized around a central green space. Th e Comprehensive Plan identifi es the GrandView Heights District as a mixed-use center character area, a potential “area of change” and guides future land as a mixed-use center. Th e Comprehensive Plan also says that “the District is in the process of evolving from a somewhat scattered auto-oriented district to a more integrated mixed of uses.”Th e over-arching concept is to support the “go-to” uses (auto-oriented) while anticipating more “stay-at” uses (pedestrian-oriented), and to improve future use and built form around three key civic “centers”: • City Hall• Library• Community Commons (civic building and green space)Th e future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. Th e plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/• Emphasize the connection to Minnehaha Creek.• Create a recognized, visible arts identity and provide space/place for greater community arts users and producers.• Address needs of underserved populations (teens, singles, seniors, etc.).• Establish a community commons as a multi-purpose facility for a wide audience (e.g., whole body, whole life, health and wellness) and as a focal point and central gathering place that connects City Hall to the east with the Library to the southwest. • Celebrate the “Birthplace” of Edina, the Mill, and record the oral history of GrandView Heights; tell the stories.• Emphasize a pedestrian-oriented sense of place that produces an appropriate scale and function, and preserves surrounding views. • Support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and effi cient connections between home, school, work, recreation, and business destinations through improved pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout the area. 154/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Land Use PlanVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use CenterOffi ceMedium/High Density Residential 164/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master PlanExisting BuildingsPotential DevelopmentProposed Civic Community Buildings 174/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Potential Build-OutVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveLibraryHwy 100City Hall 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking North 194/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic Works SiteLand UseDevelopment3.6 acres Site28,000 SF Public Green24 units Condominium42 units Apartments50,000 SF Community/Civic16 units TownhousesParking200 spaces Park and Ride200 spaces Community Use158 spaces Multi-familyTh e public works site is located in a central point of the District and is seen as the “commons” for how the District vision will be realized. Uses proposed include the community green space located on top of a parking garage that supports area businesses, civic uses, and serves as a Metro Transit park and ride structure; a community/civic building anchoring the green; and a variety of residential uses including condominiums, apartments, and townhouse building types. Townhouse units are envisioned to front Arcadia as a building type that can incrementally “step-up” the hill, providing a character unique to the District.Public GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesTownhousesArcadia AvePublic Works SitePublic GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesEden AveArcadia AveEden AveA form-based code can guide desired building use and frontage. 203. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Land UsePublic Works Site Looking SoutheastGrandView CrossingArcadia AveEden AveHwy 100 214/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterProposed North-South SectionProposed East -West SectionLand UsePublic Works SiteGrandView Green Space on top of Parking StructureGrandView Green on top of Parking StructureNew frontage road on west side of Hwy 100ArcadiaOLGHwy 100Rail ROW Existing City RampJerry’sCommunity CenterCondominiumsTownhousesParkingEden AveGrandView Crossing 224/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBus Garage SiteLand UseEden Ave5,000 SF Retail42,000 SF Offi ce175 spaces ParkingDue to the elevation change, this site lends itself to supporting a number of commercial and retail uses by adding a small, one level parking structure contiguous to and south of Jerry’s. Th is structure would work with the existing topography to allow better access to the Jerry’s loading area and to provide additional parking to support the grocery and needed parking at grade. Th is site could also accommodate a drive-thru use such as a small community bank, cleaners, or coff ee shop.ParkingRetailOffi ce/RetailOffi ceParkingEden AveJerry’s 233. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Bus Garage Site Looking NortheastLand UseEden AveJerry’s 244/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1From a land use perspective, a number of immediate steps can be taken to set the stage for new investment in the District. Th ese include: • Policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan (the Small Area Plan is intended to update the Comprehensive Plan).• Potential zoning revisions that could include a form-based code to regulate desired public realm, building frontages, and building height.• Identifi cation of Eden and Vernon as early candidates for application of Living Streets principles.• Policy direction that guides overall sustainability of the District, including consolidated reuse/recycling, stormwater management, etc.• Policy direction that guides how new public and private investment may be supported with a variety of fi nancing tools.Th e public works site (public green space and a community/civic building) and the bus garage site are the two key parcels that can “jump-start” the redevelopment process. In particular, the ability of the public works site to provide a fee simple, unencumbered asset will allow civic/community and private and public realm uses to be realized early, and will demonstrate the leverage identifi ed in the Guiding Principles to support a variety of next steps. Th is could include a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide a parking structure that would also serve as the GrandView Commons (community/civic building/public green).In similar fashion, the bus garage can be a major pivot point for how a number of land use decisions may play out and will act as a land use “connector” along Eden. Th is site may need to be readied for development sooner than the public works site in order to accommodate a series of land use transitions that will help the larger District vision implementation. A third component of an early phase would be the development of the Wanner site currently owned by Our Lady of Grace as potential residential, offi ce, or retail uses.In support of these anticipated land use changes, new street confi gurations/alignments, circulation patterns, and streetscape/pedestrian improvements along Eden will complete a bike and pedestrian network and support the anticipated land use changes with improved automobile circulation and management.12637451. Public Works2. School Bus Garage3. New Bridge/Street4. Wanner Site5. Jerry’s Site6. Jerry’s Site7. City Ramp Access 254/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1Hwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1 DiagramA. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic building• Arcadia steps• Community/Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail/service/offi ce useACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWanner/OLG PropertyTh e following chapter on Implementation is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or Phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site, and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time. See Appendix.C. Wanner Site• Townhouses fronting OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 264/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmPublic realm refers to all land and area under the ownership of the city. Th is includes city streets and rights-of-way (ROW), parks and open space, and parcels of land or other assets that are used to provide individual and collective benefi t and amenity to all residents and the general public. Th e greater value and power of the public realm is its ability to connect neighborhoods, businesses, schools, and parks and open space into a larger whole greater than the sum of the individual elements. Streets and ROW make up a major (and connected) portion of the public realm and represent a signifi cant opportunity to enhance and connect the community. It is critical to view streets, then, not as just conveyors for automobiles but also as multi-modal facilities that provide democratic accessibility for all and as form-givers and green space that increase the livability of the community. Th e result should be a greater sense of green throughout the District.Goals• Acknowledge “no net loss,” yet aggressively seek new public space.• Improve the bike and pedestrian environment: make it safe and friendly, and include adequate parking area for bikes.• Create a community/civic building connected to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green space) that connects east and west and serves as an indoor/outdoor gathering space.• Create a prominent public realm of connected parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open space – a legible green framework as the primary form giver.• Provide views within the District and maintain important viewsheds (such as the “grand view”) for public use.• Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian environment that links public and private destinations north-south (neighborhoods, library, businesses) and east-west (neighborhoods, businesses, commons, City Hall).Images (top to bottom): Osaka, Japan; Montreal, Canada; and New York, New York. 274/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmA. GrandView CommonsB. GrandView StepsC. GrandView CrossingD. Arcadia StreetscapeE. Gus Young StreetscapeF. Arcade ConnectionG. Vernon StreetscapeH. Eden StreetscapeABCDFHHGEVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St51st StPublic Realm / Open Space Diagram 284/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater opportunity exists then to continuously link the businesses and destinations within the District to the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in general. Th is can begin immediately by simply investing in a safe and connected public sidewalk network, increment by increment. Th e larger vision of the public realm includes a community/civic building and GrandView Green, a connected network of public parks, public and private plazas, a new street (GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities. Th is should include bridge enhancements on Eden over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local a bike path within the Canada Pacifi c Rail ROW.Montreal public green: Th is public green suggests the appropriate scale and character of GrandView Green. 294/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons: GrandView Commons includes GrandView Crossing, GrandView Green, and a new community/civic building.Social InteractionExercise and FitnessClassroomTeen ActivityBanquet and ReceptionHistory / InterpretivePerforming and Visual ArtsMeetingsFood Prep / Community Oven Retail / IncubatorGrandView CrossingPedestrian BridgeGrandView GreenCivic BuildingArcadia AveHwy 100GrandView Community Commons DiagramWhat / Who Populates the Commons? 304/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmVernon , Eden, Sherwood, LibraryEden AveEden AveLibraryTh e plan here is to focus on improving pedestrian connections between the Library/Senior Center and Jerry’s, via a more street-like character that extends north from GrandView Square Street, including a well-defi ned pedestrian crossing at Eden. Sherwood is shown as a conversion for additional parking and may still allow movement through the area, though at a very reduced rate of speed. Th is conversion allows a small green space to connect the Library to Vernon.1. Conversion of Eden Avenue would provide 50 additional parking spaces.2. A small green space connects the Library to Vernon giving the civic building an “address” on Vernon.3. Pedestrian crossings are created or enhanced to provide safe and visible locations (51st, 52nd, and 53rd Streets) on Vernon and to the west of the bus garage site on Link to cross the street.4. Th e GrandView Square area is connected to Jerry’s and beyond through the use of a streetscape that provides a well-defi ned pedestrian system as well as a more organized parking and circulation pattern.5. Any additional street and block improvements (including curb cuts and /or traffi c signals) should be considered after improvements have been made to Vernon and appropriate traffi c and parking studies have been completed (also refer to potential alternatives in the appendix)1123334Vernon AveGrandView SquareSherwoodBrookside52nd St53rd St5Link 314/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmEden AveLibraryGrandView SquareVernon AveLibrary Site Looking East 324/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterArcadia AveVernon AveGus Young LnJerry’sGrandView CrossingPublic RealmVernon, Gus Young, Interlachen Interl ac h e n Th e plan recommends a number of street and traffi c improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffi c, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians. Th is is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing) and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor) that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern. Anchoring the public realm is the GrandView Green, an approximately one-half + acre public space located on the north end of the public works site.1. New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing).2. GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area.3. Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair.4. Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed.5. Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon.6. Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements.7. Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100.8. Public steps of Arcadia.1233455678SummitCommunity / Civic BuildingCity Parking Ramp 334/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterCity HallPublic RealmVernon AveEden AveCity HallHwy 100Sunnyslope RdDale DrWith the future addition of the split-diamond interchange for Highway 100, the east side could see some signifi cant changes with the public realm, land use, and improved pedestrian/bike environments.1. Frontage road associated with the split-diamond interchange.2. Excess land from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) could be used for underground parking (with a green roof deck) and future community/civic use.3. Strategy would provide an improved/expanded Frank Tupa Park and setting for the historic Cahill School and Grange Hall.4. Grange Road alignment is “rationalized” to provide a more effi cient parking layout and allow for a small civic green (5) in front of City Hall.5. Pedestrian/bike bridge connects to west side of Highway 100.6. Eden is shown as a “parking” street to provide additional supply for City Hall.2456314 344/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationTh e GrandView area street and movement network is primarily composed of Vernon/50th Street (reliever/augmenter arterial), Eden (local street, state-aid facility) and the multiple ingress/egress ramp system of Highway 100 (designated a principal arterial). Th ere are other local streets, but most provide limited service (such as Summit Avenue) or access that dead ends (such as Brookside off Eden). Th e highway interchange has several on and off ramps that, according to MnDOT, are redundant and/or unsafe. Vernon is a county facility that, south of Interlachen, has seen a reduction of average daily traffi c over the past 10 years. Eden provides a secondary connection within the District east and west over Highway 100. Eden is designated the primary bike route through the District; Vernon and Interlachen are designated as secondary routes.Th ere are two major recommendations that support the overall movement and transportation goals of the plan. First, the Framework proposes that the Highway 100 interchange be reconfi gured into a split-diamond interchange to better manage through-traffi c and to provide improved local access/circulation via frontage roads east and west of the highway. Over time, this would provide a more connected local system (i.e., more local streets) with direct access to Highway 100 via the frontage roads. Second, the Framework proposes a new east-west street along the north half of the public works site (spanning the CP Rail corridor) connecting to Arcadia from Vernon, that would be paired with Gus Young Lane to provide a one-way circulation pattern. It would operate as one-way in (eastbound) from Vernon on the new GrandView Crossing, and one-way out (westbound) to Vernon/Interlachen on Gus Young Lane. Th is pattern would eliminate the left hand turn from Vernon (southbound) to Gus Young Lane.Bike improvements would focus on more lane area and identifi cation along Vernon and Eden, consistent with Living and Complete Streets principles. Over the long term, east-west bike and pedestrian access would be improved by adding a new bridge over Highway 100 that would connect the GrandView Commons to Tupa Park, City Hall, and the Minnehaha Creek mill area. In addition to more bike parking facilities in the District, the plan recommends an off -road option within the District: an at-grade bike path alongside the CP Rail ROW from Eden connecting to Brookside.Functional Class • Highway 100: Principal Arterial.• 50th Street: A Minor Augmenter.• Vernon Avenue: B Minor Connector.• Interlachen Boulevard: Major Collector.• Eden Avenue: Local Street.Traffi c Volume• 13,000-23,000 AADT along West 50th Street/Vernon Avenue.• 4000-8000 AADT along Eden Avenue.Goals • Support a more effi cient, compact, and safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon and Eden.• Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden, and the local street network.• Create an improved circulation and access network between public streets/parcels and private development/destinations.• Create an enhanced parking environment that, in part, depends on shared, centrally-located District parking supplies.• Partner with Metro Transit to implement a community-scale Park and Ride and bus turnaround loop in the area.• Complete the historical transition of Vernon from old Highway 169 to a local District street.• Identify and implement a demonstration project for “Complete/Living” streets principles.• Provide additional auto, bike, and pedestrian connections east and west in the District.• Maintain and improve parking, access, and circulation in the short term for convenience, retail, and service uses.• Complete the pedestrian and bike system. Make bikes and pedestrians a priority and allow for a safe crossing over Highway 100.• Take a leadership role related to the Highway 100 interchange. Build the “reason platform” for multi-modal access and gateways.• Preserve the CP Rail corridor for future, possible public transit, and non-motorized movement/connection in the District.• Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. 354/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterComplete/Living Streets improvementsPrivate streetscapesSplit diamond interchangeNew / improved bridgesTransportationVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100District Street FrameworkTh e movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” confi guration. Th is approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. Th e existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffi c would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term, there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffi c access and circulation in the upper core of the District. 364/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationDistrict Street FrameworkExistingProposed 374/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking WestVernon AveEden AveHwy 100 384/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationParking• Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/practical.• Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district.• Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply.Parking beneath buildingsNew access to existingSurface lotsExisting rampDirection of traffi cVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100PP 394/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationPark and Ride OptionsABCLocationSpaces NotesA Use existing ramp244 Access issuesC New ramp in “cloverleaf”n/a Long termB New ramp on public works site200 Fee simple587 Express RouteExisting bus stopsVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Metro Transit operates the #587 Express route through the GrandView District before turning north on Highway 100 to downtown. Th ey have a well documented market that they serve in southwest Edina, and board riders on a daily basis who are parking in front of the library, in the city ramp, and in front of a number of businesses. Th ey are highly motivated to locate a “community” scale park and ride facility that would accommodate no more than 200 cars. At least two sites have the potential to serve this need: the existing city ramp and a potential structure on the public works site. Th e existing city ramp is currently undergoing a construction project (new water treatment plant on the ground fl oor) and according to the city, this would make adding additional levels problematic. Access will also be an issue as well when the new GrandView Crossing is built. Th e city does think additional parking could be located over Brookside behind and east of Jerry’s.Under the right conditions and with some minor improvements, the public works site could be converted into a park and ride lot tomorrow. Th is would be an interim solution (a similar scenario involving the site as an interim use for the Edina bus garage could also be considered). Th e advantage of locating a park and ride on the public works site is that it is a fee simple site that could be used with little change to existing conditions. In general, a park and ride could provide a surplus of parking during nights and weekends, and serve overfl ow parking in the District as well. 404/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationVernon Avenue Right-SizingSouth of the Interlachen intersection, Vernon Avenue would be reconfi gured into a three lane, divided section that would better accommodate local traffi c movement, provide a dedicated bike lane, and capture some of the ROW for pedestrian improvements and street crossings.sidewalk8’sidewalk8’boulevard6’boulevard6’bike lane6’bike lane6’drive lane12’medianvariesdrive lane12’Proposed Section for Vernon AvenueExisting Section for Vernon Avenuedrive lanedrive lane12’12’drive lanedrive lane12’12’Vernon Avenue Looking South: A new three lane section would allow additional space for bikes and pedestrians, and provide controlled left turn lanes. 414/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 ImprovementsTransportationShort Term ImprovementsLong Term ImprovementsNew rampsEliminated rampsSignalA major proposal involves the short term and long term confi guration of the Highway 100 interchange. Th e plan proposes a “split-diamond” arrangement that would manage access on and off the highway at signalized intersections. Th ese intersections would be at Vernon and Eden, and would connect with parallel, one-way frontage roads. Th is confi guration would allow regional traffi c to clearly and safely access the highway and still move into the District with predictability and safety. Long term prospects might include the transfer of unused MnDOT ROW for local and community uses such as civic building sites, future bus rapid transit support, parking, and open space. 424/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBicycle ImprovementsTransportationPrimary bike routesSecondary bike routesTrail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of-way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 434/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationBicycle ImprovementsEden AvenueVernon between Eden and Interlachen Vernon south of EdenExistingExisting ExistingProposedProposed ProposedPrecedentPrecedent 444/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityOne dictionary defi nes sustainability as:• Th e ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confi rmed. • Th e quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long term ecological balance.For GrandView, sustainability is about how the natural and manmade environments coexist in a way that limits and/or prohibits harmful impact on the environment now and for generations to come. But it also has meaning for how the community and businesses will be sustained, supported, and upheld. One is not isolated or independent from the other; a comprehensive, long term defi nition of sustainability should guide how the District and the community move forward with goals, recommendations, and actions.Recent Activities Sustainability is a broad and deep subject that is constantly being refi ned from principles and policies to products and practices to fi nancing and implementation—perhaps so much so that it may seem diffi cult to determine where to begin and what next steps should be taken. For GrandView, it seems practical to review some of the recent decisions and actions the city has taken that will provide a foundation for how the District will grow, change, and redevelop.• Edina Energy & Environment Commission: Solar/wind ordinance amendments task force. City staff is reviewing proposed ordinance. • PACE Financing: Th e Edina City Council unanimously adopted the Edina Emerald Energy Program November 15, 2011, making it the fi rst Minnesota city to take advantage of Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) legislation. PACE, which was approved by the state Legislature in 2010, allows property owners to have the cost of energy effi ciency and conservation improvements assessed to their property and paid alongside property taxes. GrandView Tire & Auto, 5415 70th Street West, used the tool for the necessary fi nancing to install a 27-kilowatt solar panel system on the already green auto shop’s roof.• New Public Works Facility: Th e public works building was built with sustainability in mind. It has geothermal heating and cooling and used recycled materials, and its landscape was designed to minimize the development’s impact on the environment. A rain garden at the corner of 74th and Metro Boulevard holds and infi ltrates water from sloping parking lots with curb cuts to direct the water to native grasses and plants.• City Hall: Installation of solar panel project in Fall of 2011.• City Council Living Streets policy: Recommendation of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) to establish a comprehensive Living Streets Policy that integrated all modes of transportation and addressed issues such as traffi c calming, stormwater management, promoting active living, community feel, improving walking and biking, and enhancing urban forests. If approved by the Council, the ETC would work in collaboration with staff to prepare the policy for the Council’s future consideration. Mr. Sullivan reported a $15,000 grant was available to initiate the creation of this policy, which may cost $60,000-$100,000 to complete. • Adoption of MinesotaGreenStep Cities program, 2011: On January 18, 2011, Edina passed a council resolution to become a member of the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary challenge, assistance, and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more specifi c actions from a list of four to eight actions. Th ese actions are tailored to all Minnesota cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation. 454/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityGreenstep’s 28 Best PracticesBuildings and Lighting1. Effi cient Existing Public Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.2. Effi cient Existing Private Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.3. New Green Buildings: Construct new buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.4. Effi cient Building & Street Lighting and Signals: Improve the effi ciency of public and private lighting and signals.5. Building Reuse: Create economic and regulatory incentives for redeveloping and repurposing existing buildings before building new.Land Use6. Comprehensive Plan and Implementation: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it.7. Effi cient City Growth: Promote fi nancial and environmental sustainability by enabling and encouraging higher density housing and commercial land use.8. Mixed Uses: Develop effi cient and healthy land patterns.9. Effi cient Highway-Oriented Development:Adopt commercial development and design standards for highway road corridors.10. Conservation Design: Adopt development ordinances or processes that protect natural systems.Transportation11. Complete Green Streets: Create a network of multi-modal green streets.12. Mobility Options: Promote active living and alternatives to single-occupancy car travel.13. Effi cient City Fleets: Implement a city fl eet investment, operations, and maintenance plan.14. Demand-Side Travel Planning: Implement Travel Demand Management and Transit-Oriented Design.Environmental Management15. Purchasing: Adopt environmentally preferable purchasing policies and practices.16. Urban Forests: Increase city tree and plant cover.17. Ecologic Stormwater Management: Minimize the volume of and pollutants in rainwater runoff .18. Parks and Trails: Enhance the city’s green infrastructure.19. Surface Water Quality: Improve local water bodies.20. Effi cient Water and Wastewater Facilities: Assess and improve drinking water and wastewater facilities.21. Septic Systems: Implement an eff ective management program for decentralized wastewater treatment systems.22. Solid Waste Reduction: Increase waste reduction, reuse and recycling.23. Local Air Quality: Prevent generation of local air contaminants.Economic and Community Development24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability eff orts, and engage community members in ongoing education, dialogue, and campaigns.25. Green Business Development: Document the use of assistance programs for green business and job development.26. Renewable Energy: Remove barriers to and encourage installation of renewable energy generation capacity.27. Local Food: Strengthen local food and fi ber production and access.28. Business Synergies: Network/cluster businesses to achieve better energy, economic, and environmental outcomes. 464/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Goals• Take a position on sustainability; be a model for city wide sustainability.• Defi ne incentives to attract “Best-in-Class” development that deliver highest levels of sustainable design.• Take advantage of “free” resources: wind, rain, and sun.• Reduce heat island eff ect and create a pedestrian environment that is pleasant, shaded, and visually interesting.• Address stormwater runoff in all phases and facets of the District.• Build on existing infrastructure.• Take advantage of available partnerships/funding.• Create District (not separate site) solutions.• Apply GreenStep Best Practices.RecommendationsA number of recommendations should be considered for the District and emerge from what is being done by the City Council, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, other boards/commissions, and various stakeholders. Th e GreenStep Cities best practices are an obvious start to how these apply to the District. Beyond that, it will be important to defi ne the District in an organizational manner so that roles and responsibilities can be defi ned and actions coordinated. A good example would be how a District committee on sustainability could begin to defi ne the “GrandView Works”—a sustainable practices approach for how water, waste, and energy are addressed from a District point of view.For GrandView, there are three levels of approach and opportunity that build from what is being done today in the District (in some cases by individual businesses or owners) and lay the groundwork for a sustainable strategy:1. Work from existing strengths and build the foundation• Respond to existing plans, policies, and best practices already in place (local, county, and regional policies).• Educate District stakeholders about best practices, case studies, etc.• Establish a general communications structure and forum for what is being done.• Consider new policy to focus on redevelopment areas like GrandView with sustainability guidelines.• Stormwater management policy at the District level (works with both watersheds).• Pilot project(s) for solar light installation (pedestrian and parking areas).2. District Systems• Stormwater strategy under parking collection/storage/treatment/reuse.• Recycle/reuse building materials (after demolition).• Grey water use.• Trash collection and recycling within the District beyond what is currently required by the city.• Consolidated organic recycling focused on restaurants in the area.• Generate alternative power for specifi c uses/needs.• Green and white roofs.3. Closed Loops• Recycled stormwater into drinking water supply.• Recycled grey water into drinking water supply.• Off -the-grid.• Green buildings—zero carbon. 474/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability 4/05/124. Moving Forward with a Purpose 494/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Strategy1. Adopt the framework as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.As a policy document, the Comprehensive Plan off ers the ability to guide future development in the GrandView District even in the absence of more defi nitive plans. Once adopted, the framework provides signifi cant context for determining further directions and actions in the GrandView District.2. Establish an Implementation Steering Committee using citizen volunteers to guide the eff ort, including providing direction for key remaining areas of the framework, with working groups as needed to support the work of the Implementation Steering Committee.An over-riding objective of the GrandView District planning process is to utilize local citizens as experts in defi ning directions for an area identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan as a location where the potential for change exists. With signifi cant investment of time, talent, and energy, in addition to the local knowledge that has been developed through the Small Area Guide process and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that the process of planning using local citizens to guide the process should continue. Th e process to be pursued should, as in past eff orts leading to the framework, be defi ned by the citizen volunteers.5. Set a plan for the evolution of the District.Th e planning process was established with the understanding that the GrandView District would redevelop incrementally in concert with a vision defi ned by the community. A key aspect of the plan, and one that can be best defi ned once several of the decision points in Step 4 (above) have been advanced, is to determine a logical, sustainable, and reasonably defi nitive plan for its evolution.6. Provide regular updates to the City Council.A Steering Committee charged with guiding the further development of a plan for the GrandView District cannot act independently of other actions of the city, just as the area itself cannot evolve independent of the rest of the Edina community. With regular updates, the evolving plan can be assured that it aligns with other policies of the city.3. Evaluate the GrandView District small area planning process as a means of engaging citizens in local planning.As indicated in the Comprehensive Plan, several areas of potential change remain in the community. An objective review of the GrandView process will allow the city to determine whether it should be replicated, modifi ed, or abandoned as a local planning tool. 4. Initiate a process led by the Implementation Steering Committee to provide direction for key remaining areas of the framework.Remaining key decision points, many of which are interrelated but all of which must be defi ned in terms of the approved framework, include:• Transportation elements• Density and height• Housing aff ordability• Financing• Design and development guidelines• Community Building 504/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1-5 years5-10 years10+ yearsVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Generalized Phasing PlanA generalized phasing plan is shown that organizes phasing into three simplifi ed increments with the understanding that a variety of conditions will infl uence actual investment and implementation.1. Policy and RegulationTh is Framework recommends (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) that the District evolve from a Community Commercial Node (pg. 4-31 Comprehensive Plan) into a mixed-use center. However, the Plan also suggests a vision that may not be completely consistent with current zoning including how use, built form, and parking may be regulated. Concurrent with other implementation activities, zoning revisions, including the potential use of a form-based code and design guidelines will be addressed by the Implementation Steering Committee after approval of the Framework by the City Council. 2. Phasing, Development & FinanceTh e following graphic begins the discussion about how to best arrange and prioritize the public land parcels (public works site and school bus garage site) so that new investment and redevelopment can occur in a timely manner and in response to market and community forces. Central in this discussion is the school bus garage site which, when a new garage site can be found, can include new commercial/offi ce uses, replacement of existing uses, expansion of businesses in the district currently in need of more space (such as the municipal liquor store), and parking. Th is could help set the stage for how next steps could be accomplished including initial investment on the public works site, parking and circulation enhancements/additions, and Eden Avenue improvements. In addition, a community building / public green programming group should work during this phase to determine appropriate program and uses. 514/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Immediate < 1 year1 Development Framework approval2 Policy for implementation/fi nance3 Create Implementation Committee4. Implementation Committee should address programming of community / civic building5 Create sustainability guide from GreenStep6 TIF District7A Design Guidelines7 Form-based code for mixed use center8 Green building standards required for district9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan10 Address Lifecycle and aff ordable housing1-5 YearsLand Use11 Bus Garage site redevelopment12 Townhouse units on public works site13 Residential on Warner site/OLG14 Community / Civic buildingPublic Realm15 GrandView Green over parking structure16 Arcadia Steps/and streetscape17 CP Rail bike path from Eden to Brookside18 Add tree lined streetscape and monument signs into Richmond Hills neighborhoodTransportation/Infrastructure19 Park n ride structure/green roof@public works site20 Additional parking south of Jerry’s21 GrandView Crossing bridge & street22 Eden Living Streets/streetscape /3 lane section23 Eden Living Streets/Arcadia/Normandale24 New access from Eden to city ramp parking25 Jerry’s parking Streetscape26 Implement one-way pairs/remove left to G. Young27 Reservation on public works site for rail transit use Sustainability28 GrandView Works/Organics recycling center 29 Stormwater reuse & management policy30 Solar pilot project for public lightingMajor Recommendations 524/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation5-10 YearsLand Use31 Arcadia site redevelopment/include pocket park32 Apt/condo units on public works site33 Residential on Warner site/OLG/Phase 2Public Realm34 Small civic green at City Hall35 Arcadia streetscape improvementsTransportation/Infrastructure36 Vernon Living Streets/streetscape/3 lane section37 Dedicate right turn from Vernon to Interlachen38 Reconfi gure Eden as parking street@City Hall39 Eden bridge pedestrian/bike enhancements40 Vernon as primary bike route to GrandView Crossing41 Consider ‘turn-back’ of Vernon from County42 Complete Streets: Library green space fronting Vernon 43 Reconfi gure Eden as parking streetSustainability44 Stormwater collection/treatment system45 Grey water reuse/irrigation, etc.46 GrandView Works/geothermal at OLG fi elds10+ YearsLand Use47 East frontage road site redevelopment48 Civic development on excess MNDOT landPublic Realm49 Hwy 100 pedestrian/bike bridge50 Green roof/space over underground parking51 Add green space to Tupa Park52 Include gateway walls/landscape w/interchangeTransportation/Infrastructure53 Hwy 110 split diamond interchange54 Realignment of Grange Rd/Eden55 Add Gus Young extension to frontage roadSustainability56 Closed loop water supply system57 GrandView Works/Alternative energy sourcesMajor Recommendations 534/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1DC - Downtown Core StandardsSide(2) Siting(3) Heightat the front of the lot: a minimum of 75% of build-ing facade shall be placed within 5 feet of the front lot line. This requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street or sidewalk 5’see Height Overlay District for minimum and maximum heights and upper storey stepbacksat the rear of the lot: 10’ setback required for load-ing areas, none if adjacent to street or alley.parking setback line30’at the side of the lot: none required. One side of build-inmg must be placed at the side lot line. Also refer to Neighborhood Compatibility requirements 10’commerceresidentialfi nished fl oor height: avg 3 feet above sidewalkfi nished fl oor height: maximum 18 inches above sidewalkA. Building Height i. Th e buildings shall be at least 2 storeys in height but no greater than the heights as designated on map____. Upper storey step backs are also designated on map____.B. Ground Storey Height: Commerce Uses i. Th e average ground storey fl oor elevation within 30 feet of the front property line shall be 1.Not lower than the front sidewalk elevation. 2.Not higher than 18 inches above the sidewalk. ii. Th e ground storey shall have at least 15 feet of clear interior height contiguous to the front property line for a minimum depth of 25 feet. iii. Th e maximum ground storey height is 22 feet, measured from the sidewalk to the second storey fl oor. C. Ground Storey Height (residential uses) i. Th e average fi nished fl oor elevation shall be no less than 3 feet above the sidewalk at the front property line ii. Th e ground storey shall have an interior clear height of at least 9 feet and a maximum sidewalk to second storey fl oor height of 22 feet. d. Upper storey height i. Th e maximum clear height (fl oor to ceiling) for upper storeys is 12 feet. ii. At least 80% of each upper storey shall have an interior clear height (fl oor to ceiling) of at least 9 feet. A. Façadei. On each lot the building façade shall be built to within 5 feet of the front property line for at least 75% of it’s length. Th is requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street and public sidewalk. ii. Within 10 feet of a block corner, the ground storey façade may be pulled away to form a corner entry. B. Usable Open Spacei. A minimum of 40 square feet per residential unit shall be pro-vided. Th is space may be shared among units, or may take the form of balconies, roof decks, usable portions of green roofs or other above ground amenities. ii. Open space created infront of the building shall be designed as semi-public space, used as a forecourt, outdoor seating or other semi-public uses. C. Garage and Parkingi. Parking garage openings visible from the sidewalk shall have a clear maximum height of 16 feet and a maximum width of 22 feet. ii. Parking shall be located behind the parking setback lineMin 9ftMax 12ft clear (typ) max 22 ft (typ) (typ) (typ) PropertiesMinimum HeightMaximum HeightPublic realm / Private realmResultA form based approach is organized to code development that defi nes the public realm.Example of form-based code standards for a downtown setting. 544/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Financial FeasibilityFeasibility of fi nancing would include: (1) projections of anticipated costs associated with an initial Phase 1 plan and (2) options for revenues to pay those costs. Th is includes items such as street improvements, streetscape improvements, parking infrastructure, property acquisition (i.e., the bus garage), and community space (both potential “commons” or “public realm” space and “programming” or “community/civic center” space). At this point six potential pools or “buckets” of revenue have been identifi ed:1. TIF, Abatement, and other statutory economic development tools;2. Special Assessments;3. Enhanced Property Tax revenues generated by private property development;4. Other Public Sources of funds;5. Non-Profi t or Philanthropic Fundraising; and6. City Tax Revenues.1. TIF, Abatement, and Other Statutory Economic Development Tools.Access some portion of existing TIF Funds; there may be an opportunity to use existing TIF funds. Determine the circumstances under which that is possible and the consequences of doing so.Create a new TIF district. TIF and Abatement tools provide opportunities to “capture” increased value and use it to fi nance some parts of redevelopment. Determine a sense of the potential numbers associated with these options and any limits on how the funds generated by these mechanisms can be spent.2. Special Assessments and Related Tools. Th e City may assess properties that “benefi t” from public improvements for the costs of these improvements up to the value of the benefi t conferred by the improvements. Determine what types of costs are eligible to be recovered using this tool and on related tools that permit the creation of special districts to spread the ongoing costs of maintenance or other improvements. Th e 50th and France area may provide a model for this. 3. Enhanced Property Tax Revenues Generated by Private Development. Th is idea overlaps to a certain extent with #1 above (to the extent the enhanced value will be “captured” via TIF or Abatement). Obviously, the greatest increase of this type would be new development on parcels (like the Public Works and School Bus Garage sites). And consider the prospect of enhanced value emanating from redevelopment of sites (e.g., CSM, Eden 100, etc.) that are already on the tax rolls; having some models of what is reasonable to expect in this category is important.4. Other Public Sources of Funds. Consider the potential partnerships with other public entities that might be able to help with funding. Th e planning activities in this phase of the process have been funded by the Met Council; there might be a prospect of additional funds as planning and implementation move forward. Met Council representatives have also been clear in expressing interest in park and ride facilities. In addition to the Met Council, there are prospects for partnership with MnDOT (related to Highway 100) and Hennepin County (related to Vernon Avenue). To the extent that housing is a part of future redevelopment, there may be Regional, State, and/or Federal funds available to support those eff orts. Th ese any other prospective sources of “Other Public Funds” should be summarized and estimated. 5. Non-Profi t and Philanthropic Fundraising.Consider that private contributions could help with funding. Th ese potential sources of revenue fall into two categories: (1) funds from existing non-profi t organizations interested in supporting particular development initiatives (e.g., housing, arts, etc.) and (2) fundraising campaigns created specifi cally for this eff ort. Determine what is reasonable to expect from each “bucket” and be able to determine whether the “gap” remaining after all other “buckets” are utilized can be fi lled by some kind of capital campaign.6. City Tax Revenues. Th e other way to fi ll any remaining gap is with City tax revenues. Obviously, this is a decision for the City Council to make. It will be important to identify the size of the gap (if any) that will likely need to be fi lled by such funding. 554/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementationPossible Staging Questions1. Interim use. Designation of City parking ramp for park and ride?2. Disposition of School Bus Garage Site. Can City negotiate control? If so, when and what are the next steps? RFI? RFP? Negotiate existing user in the District to acquire and invest. 3. How can public works site be best utilized in the interim? As temporary (2-3 year) school bus garage operations? As surface park and ride until structure is built? RFI? RFP? Interim use could allow time for community building use/need to be determined. 4. How to leverage adjacent parcels with timing of bus garage site redevelopment?5. What is timing/feasibility of west side frontage road/southbound ramp confi guration? How to advance that agenda in the short term (1-5 years).6. Eden could / should be programmed for Living Streets improvements consistent with initial phases of development. 7. Feasibility of timing of street, bridge, and deck improvements. 24617365Vernon AveEden AveHwy 100 4/05/125. Appendix 574/05/125. AppendixImplementationHwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1ACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWagner / OLG PropertyTh e following Implementation section is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time.Phase 1A. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic Building• Arcadia Steps• Community Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail / service offi ce use• Possible drive - thru useC. Warner Site• Townhouses fronting the OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 584/05/125. AppendixImplementation GrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲBusGarageSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sfNonͲresidentialcommercial 5,000 950,000.00$190.00$office 42,000 7,980,000.00$190.00$rampparking75 937,500.00$12,500.00$surfaceparking75 112,500.00$1,500.00$47,000150 9,980,000.00$ 594/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲPublicWorksSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostResidentialtownhouse16 46 8,832,000.00$160 1200 192000smallhouse0150 1200 180000apartment42 64 6,426,000.00$170 900 153000condo24 48 5,472,000.00$190 1200 228000Total82 158 20,730,000.00$NonͲresidentialcommercial150office150community 50,00010,000,000.00$200parking200 3,500,000.00$17,500parknride200 3,500,000.00$17,500Total400 17,000,000.00$ 604/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲInfrastructureandStreetsLF Ac PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostInfrastructureVernon(*)950332,500.00$350crosswalk525,000.00$5000roadway1,500,000.00$EdenWest(*)385134,750.00$350EdenEast20070,000.00$350crosswalk315,000.00$5000roadway1,500,000.00$Jerrysstreet875306,250$350$GusYoungext(*)15052,500$350$OLGroad15052,500.00$350Bridges(EST)eachGͲViewCrossing750,000.00$estCPRail750,000.00$estsubtotal5,488,500.00$HWY100Splitdiamond(est)$10,000,000Ped/Bike(est)1,500,000.00$(*)ͲDoesnotincludebudgetsforroadwayimprovements/updgrades/reconstructionͲbudgetsareforlandscape/streetscapeonly 614/05/125. AppendixVernon and InterchangeTransportation 624/05/125. AppendixVernonTransportation 634/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 644/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 654/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesLibrary / Eden / LinkProposed Illustrative Plan (p.16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Alternative 3: Streetscape improvements 664/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesArcadia and Gus YoungProposed Illustrative Plan (p. 16)Alternative 1Alternative 2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study August 31st, 2016 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study iii Thanks to the following for their contributions to this project: Edina Transportation Commission Tom LaForce, Chair Ralk Loeffelholz, Vice Chair Katherine Bass Andy Brown Surya Iyer Jennifer Janovy Larr y Olson Lou Miranda Lindsey Reuhl, Student Member Emily Ding, Student Member City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study August 31st, 2016 Edina City Staff Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Chad Millner, Engineering Director Cary Teague, Community Development Director Consultant Team LHB, Inc. Nelson\Nygaard Alta Planning + Design Bruce Jacobson, Landscape Architect And special thanks to the many Grandview “Alumni” who participated in this and the ongoing planning efforts for this District. iv Table of Contents iv Table of Contents Executive Summary vii Setting + Context 1 Existing Conditions 2 Project Process 3 Goals 8 Metrics 9 Timeline for Change 13 Short Term Changes 14 Mid Term Changes 18 Long Term Changes 22 Far Term Changes 26 Focus Areas 29 Introduction 30 1 – Jerry’s Connection from Eden 31 2 – Arcadia + Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 32 3 – School Bus Site + New Ramp 36 4 – Vernon Avenue & W. 50th Street 38 5 – Interlachen Boulevard 41 6 – Eden Avenue 44 7 – Grandview Neighborhood 47 8 – Highway Access 48 9 – Highway 100 Ped/Bike Bridge 50 10 – Transit Center 52 11 – Our Lady of Grace 54 12 – Beyond Study Area 55 Transportation Analysis 57 Assumptions 58 Existing Conditions 62 Short Term Changes 64 Mid Term Changes 66 Long and Far Term Changes 68 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study v Table of Contentsv Settings + Context1 Timeline for Change2 Focus Areas3 Traffic Modeling4 Appendices Briefing Book Meeting Notes Traffic Model Data Appendix 1 Appendix 2 Appendix 3 vi vi Figure 1.1 The existing condition at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study vii vii Executive Summary The Grandview District evolved and changed dramatically throughout its history. Recently, the District has been studied in numerous processes, culminating in the “Grandview District Framework Plan.” That plan recommended a transportation study be conducted in order to fully understand the impacts and tradeoffs of proposed redevelopment and network changes on all modes of travel. This study addresses that recommenda- tion and uses the Framework Plan as a starting point for under- standing potential change in the area. However, this study aims to do more than provide a review, alternatives, and recommen- dations; it also seeks to align itself with the culture, possibility, and potential for the District to be rejuvenated into a place where Living Streets meets everyday life. To that end, this document describes a series of recommen- dations for all modes of transportation, which could be imple- mented within a range of timeframes. Which general timeframe a specific project appears in depends on contextual issues such as key safety improvements, opportunities related to potential related projects, timing of planned infrastructure improvements, and scale of required planning and funding related to a particular proposal. These enhancements were analyzed for impacts to all modes of transportation and are summarized as follows: Short Term Changes (0-5 Years) • Pedestrian crossing and intersection improvements for Ver- non and Eden Avenues with controlled intersections, ad- justed signal timing, and/or striping • Adjustments to signal timing and driveway access at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue • New direct access from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s for all modes • Conversion of two off-ramps from Highway 100 from ex- isting free-rights to proposed standard signal-controlled right turns • Reconfiguration of Arcadia Avenue along the former Public Works site to accommodate pedestrians and bikers Mid Term Changes (5-15 Years) • North part of Arcadia Avenue converted to a shared street • Vernon and Eden Avenues converted to support bikes, pe- destrians, greenspace, and traffic management • Add infrastructure to support bicycling on Eden Avenue over Highway 100 • Continued simplification of Highway 100 on-ramps; new northbound access at 50th Street • Reopen a signalized intersection at 53rd Street and Vernon Avenue • Enhanced bus stops on Vernon and Eden Avenues • New frontage road, providing southbound access to High- way 100 and access to development parcels on west side of Highway 100 • Improve parking options at municipal ramp and current School District site, with associated policy improvements Long Term Changes (15-30 Years) • Complete pedestrian and bicycle connection along 50th Street, across Highway 100 • New pedestrian and cyclist connection over Highway 100 to City Hall • New frontage road providing northbound access to High- way 100 and access to development parcels on east side of Highway 100 • Reconfiguration of Eden Avenue, Lind Road, and the library parking lot with improvements for all modes • Direct connection for high-capacity transit line at a new transit hub on the former Public Works development site • New District parking options incorporated into the former Public Works site, with associated parking policy This plan also includes a brief overview of a Far Term Plan that considers the possibility of “lid” over Highway 100. The primary transportation implication of that degree of density, is that it would require implementation of a high-capacity transit system. Executive Summary CHAPTER Existing Conditions Project Process Goals Metrics Setting + Context 1 Figure 1.1 Grandview District aerial view. Photo Credit: MnGeo WMS Service 2012. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ52N D S T IN T E R LACH EN B L VD 50T H S T BROOKSIDE AVE 2 Setting + Context 1 Existing Conditions The Grandview District is an important node of mixed com- mercial, office, and residential uses between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue on either side of Highway 100 (Figure 1.1). It has evolved significantly over its history, from farming to a hub of commercial activity, taking advantage of its access to road and rail transportation networks (Figure 1.2). Formerly, Highway 169 followed the current alignment of Vernon Avenue, making this a critical crossroads of two highways. Even after Highway 169 was realigned, Vernon remained a busy road which has con- tinued to support retail and office uses. The current character of the Grandview District is described in detail in the Briefing Book (Appendix 1), but a few elements of the transportation system quickly emerged as key to under- standing how things work today. First, the District has long been designed for use primarily by automobile traffic. The facil- ities for bikes and pedestrians are disconnected, uncomfortable, and require safety improvements. Residents are particularly concerned about the difficulty for crossing Vernon Avenue to get to Jerry’s Grocery Store, but gaps in the bike and pedestri- an network occur throughout the area. This means that even short trips are often conducted by car, rather than by foot or bike, worsening traffic congestion, increasing the need for park- ing, and decreasing the attractiveness of transit. Second, there are several areas in the auto transportation net- work that contribute to difficult circulation patterns. The merge of two on-ramps to southbound Highway 100 has been nick- named “the death-merge” by motorists. Queuing at Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue is a source of frustration for mo- torists and cyclists alike. There are also concerns about speed- ing traffic on Vernon Avenue, queuing from the drive-through of a coffee shop on Arcadia Avenue, and inadequate or ineffective parking in several locations. In general, there is significant room for improvement throughout the system. 1947 1957 1966 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 3 Settings + Context1 Finally, the public transit system is less desirable and useful than it could be. Existing bus routes are not heavily used and those who would use them struggle with access to nearby parking and with safely and comfortably walking to and from stops. There is also significant interest in supporting passenger rail along the existing freight rail line, but many political and logistical hurdles exist for this proposal. At this time, the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) is exploring the potential of passenger rail as part of a related but separate planning effort. Additional information on existing conditions is covered in Ap- pendix 1. This Transportation Study document explores solu- tions to these and other issues through an interconnected set of proposals in the following chapters. Project Process The Grandview District Transportation Study process was in- tended to build on the progress of previous planning studies. As shown in Figure 1.3, there has been substantial planning for the District in the preceding years. In particular, many residents and stakeholders contributed to the recommendations of the Framework Plan. In particular, that plan described seven guiding principles: 1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. 2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. 2003 1991 1979 Figure 1.2 Historical aerial photography of the District, from 1947 to 2003. Courtesy of the City of Edina. GRANDVIEW DISTRICT SMALL AREA GUIDE PROCESS GRANDVIEW DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK PUBLIC WORKS SITE PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT GRANDVIEW DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION STUDY 7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES* 1. Leverage publically owned parcels 2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents 3. Turn barriers into opportunities 4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant, walkable, and attractive 5. Organize parking; provide convenience 6. Improve movement for all ages and modes 7. Unique sense of place incorporating natural and sustainable features 3 PRIMARY GOALS 1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements 2. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure 3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-increasing changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voltuntary private investment CURRENT DEVELOPMENT SCHEME 1. Residential – 170 units 2. Civic building – 60,000 SF 3. Restaurant and retail – 8,000 SF 4. Park and Ride – 100 spaces 5. Site parking – 643 spaces PROJECT GOALS 1. Identify needs, challenges, and opportunities 2. Review, evaluate, and affirm previously recommended changes 3. Offer specific recommendations, retaining the flexibility to respond to unknown challenges and opportunities 4. Recommend prioritized, phased improvements 5. Recommend improved connections to adjacent neighborhoods; focus on bicycle and pedestrian connections 6. Analyze motorized travel to guide intersection and roadway modifications 7. Follow the Living Streets Policy and Implementation Plan guidelines EDINA’S LIVING STREETS * Guiding Principles in this chart are simplied. Complete text provided in body of text of this chapter. 20132012 20152010 4 Setting + Context 1 ment reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The Framework document both called for the Transportation Study and provided a basis for its assumptions about urban de- sign and redevelopment opportunities. Because of this strong connection, the Transportation Study specifically sought out input from those who had worked on the previous studies, the “Grandview Alumni.” Their knowledge and participation formed the core of the public process and were instrumental in the design recommendations made for this report. The process for the study itself was organized around three phases, each culminating in an intensive week of design and stakeholder engagement. The process was designed to first es- tablish a shared understanding of the project during Convene Week, then explore potential solutions during Imagine Week, and finally review refined solutions during Recommend Week. Each phase is described in more detail, below. 3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advan- tage of the natural topography of the area. 4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical in- crements of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. 5. Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for peo- ple of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. 7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorpo- rates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable develop- Figure 1.3 Previous planning studies whose results have informed the direction and goals of this transportation study. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 5 Settings + Context1 Convene Week During Convene Week, the design team conducted a site tour (Figure 1.4 and Figure 1.5), analyzed existing conditions, refined the goals of the study, held a public meeting and a focus group meeting with local bike and pedestrian advocates, and presented to both the Transportation Commission and the City Council. In particular, the team used field work and background infor- mation to assess the existing transportation network, including street design standards, roadway capacity, parking management, traffic management, transit routes, pedestrian linkages, and bicy- cle connections. Based on input from City staff, the team developed four scenar- ios for analysis: • Existing conditions • New development at Edina Comprehensive Plan levels • 30 housing units per developable acre • 1.5 FAR (Floor Area Ratio) • New development at potential Framework levels • Incorporates Former Public Works Site potential • 60 housing units per developable acre • 2.0 FAR • The Framework Plan does not call for specific rede- velopment densities, therefore the analyzed densities reflect the highest foreseeable density possible with the scenarios suggested in that plan, to provide the worst case scenario for analysis. • New development with a Highway 100 Grandview Green (informally referred to as “the Lid”) • 120 housing units per developable acre • Planning for the Grandview Green has not called for specific redevelopment densities, therefore the ana- lyzed densities reflect the highest foreseeable density possible with the scenarios suggested to date, to pro- vide the worst case scenario for analysis. During the public meeting, the team presented the initial analy- sis, along with background on the earlier work done on planning for the District. The attendees then worked through a number of exercises in small groups, aimed at providing applicable local knowledge and establishing key areas for analysis and design. Participants provided substantial information and input and in particular identified the following priorities: • Consider all modes of movement Figure 1.4 Existing condition at the north end of Brookside Avenue by the municipal parking ramp behind Jerry’s Foods, and west of the railroad corridor. From the design team’s site visit, November 2015. Figure 1.5 Existing condition of Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue, showing a lack of pedestrian crossing and sidewalk facilities. From the design team’s site visit, November 2015. 0 2’ 4’8’ 6 Setting + Context 1 • Improve experience • Motorists • District parking strategy • Reorganize highway ramps • Explore street and intersection configurations • Consider through-traffic and to-traffic • Incorporate Complete Streets/Living Streets • Reconnect zones within district for all modes • Transit • Bus routes and access • Advocacy for Park and Ride • Consider passenger rail • Pedestrian experience • Enhance both safety and routing Figure 1.6 Example of proposed solutions and scenarios for Vernon Avenue from Imagine Week design concepts. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 7 Settings + Context1 Following the intensive week, the team also met with a group of local business and property owners to ensure that there was a clear understanding of how the transportation system currently and potentially served their properties. Finally, the team met with a variety of related agencies, such as staff from Hennepin County, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Minnehaha Creek Watershed Dis- trict, railroad staff, and others. Complete notes from those meetings are provided in Appendix 2, but the intent in all cas- es was to understand the related work being done by those agencies and ensure that we understand their requirements for improvements we might propose. This input, along with the project goals, provided a basis for the work done during later phases of the project. Imagine Week During Imagine Week, the team held a design charrette to ex- plore solutions, conducted additional field visits, and once again held a public meeting and presented to both the Transporta- tion Commission and the City Council. During the charrette, the Study Team developed scenarios for the transportation network (Figure 1.6), including envisioning potential solutions based on work done during the analysis phase. The Study Team then verified solutions in the field to ensure that assumptions were accurate and correct. This work resulted in the phased approach described in this document (Figure 1.7 to Figure 1.9). At the Imagine Week public meeting, the team presented the analysis work done in the Briefing Book (Appendix 1) and ex- plored the phased approach solutions in both a presentation and question-and-answer pin-up review session. The public was very supportive of the improvements in general, and especially the improvements to bicycle and pedestrian safety and access. There were questions about access to particular properties and EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50THST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50THST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NEW/ADJUSTED INTERSECTION NO CHANGE 0’ 100’ 200’ 300’ N EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50THST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NEW/ADJUSTED INTERSECTION NO CHANGE 0’ 100’ 200’ 300’ N EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50THST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB HW Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALTERATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS PED/BIKE CONNECTIONS NO CHANGE 0’ 100’ 200’ 300’ N Figure 1.7 Proposed Short Term Changes from Imagine Week. Figure 1.8 Proposed Mid Term Changes from Imagine Week. Figure 1.9 Proposed Long Term Changes from Imagine Week. 8 Setting + Context 1 about the potential for delay with the reconfigured highway on- and off-ramps. Complete notes are provided in Appendix 2. Following Imagine Week, there were once again meetings with the local business and property owners and with the related agencies. In addition, the phased approach was developed into a board that was used for “intercepts” at the library, Jerry’s gro- cery store, and Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church. Intercepts provided an opportunity for public stakeholders to review the proposed changes at a time and place that was convenient to them and provide feedback by comment card. Responses were generally positive and only minor modifications to the propos- als were suggested. Recommend Week During the final week of intensive work, the team held a fol- low-up design charrette to refine recommendations and graph- ics and once again held a public meeting and presented to both the Transportation Commission and the City Council. The de- sign charrette was primarily aimed at discussing and resolving key areas of concern and areas where feedback received from the intercept events or other input had been provided more recently. At the Recommend Week public meeting, the team presented the refined phased approach, highlighting areas that had changed since Imagine Week. Questions and input were encouraged throughout the presentation and opportunities to comment directly on the boards with post-it notes and comment cards Goals The role of this Transportation Study was established, based on the Framework Plan recommendations, in advance of the project initiation. The goals were reviewed and were still broadly supported by City staff and stakeholders and there- fore were not significantly altered. The goals of this Transportation Study are to: • Identify needs, challenges, and opportunities based on variable density scenarios • Review, evaluate, and affirm recommendations from the Grandview Framework Plan • Offer specific recommendations, retaining the flexibility to respond to unknown challenges and opportunities • Recommend prioritized, phased improvements • Recommend improved connections to adjacent neigh- borhoods; focus on bicycle and pedestrian connections • Analyze motorized travel to guide intersection and roadway modifications identified in the Development Framework • Follow the Living Streets Policy and Implementation Plan guidelines These goals acted as a framework for decisions that were made throughout the study. More detailed and specific goals became evident for particular aspects of the transportation system and for different focus areas. Those are described in Chapters 2 and 3. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 9 Settings + Context1 were provided. Once again, the response was very positive and changes were minor. Following Recommend Week, there were once again meetings with the local business and property owners and with the re- lated agencies. Because there had been a substantive change to the intersections of Vernon Avenue, Eden Avenue, and Sher- wood Road, which would affect access for residents in the Grandview neighborhood, and because no residents had been at the public meeting, a special meeting was held just with those residents. Residents were initially very concerned about access to their neighborhood since they only have one access point, but in general seemed more comfortable with the proposed solutions following that discussion. Follow-up meetings were also held with representatives from Edina’s emergency services, Jerry’s, and Our Lady of Grace to ensure their understanding of the proposed solutions. Minor modifications were made based on all the feedback re- ceived during and after Recommend Week, which is represent- ed in the plans shown in this document. Metrics While a more complete discussion of the transportation anal- ysis follows later in Chapter 4, this section describes the Study Team’s approach to developing and evaluating the Grandview District scenarios. Since a goal of the transportation study is to determine whether and how well the proposed transporta- tion network could serve the Framework Plan vision, the Study Team outlined a set of goals and evaluation metrics that address multi-modal, and in fact multidisciplinary, evaluation criteria. It is important to recognize that this study explored relatively high density assumptions, not because it advocates for or against those levels of density, but because it is necessary to analyze the transportation system under as much stress as we think is foreseeable and then determine if it can handle those loads and which improvements might help the system to handle those loads more effectively should they occur. The Study Team began by examining the ultimate vision de- scribed in the Grandview District Framework Plan, which is in- tended to unfold over many years. The team also acknowledged, however, that improvements would not unfold all at once, but over time, and are tied to safety, mobility, or development needs Figure 1.10 Example of discontinuous pedestrian facilities and unmarked crosswalks within the District. Figure 1.11 Vernon Avenue is currently a difficult barrier for pedestrians navigating the District. 10 Setting + Context 1 (Figure 1.10 and Figure 1.11). The transportation investments recommended in the Framework Plan were supportive of the vision outlined in the Framework document, but needed to be grouped and analyzed in a manner that would facilitate their implementation. With this recognition in mind, it became nec- essary to develop scenarios that were not necessarily alterna- tives to one another, but instead that built upon each other cumulatively in order to suggest how they might progress as development advances. The scenarios were refined during Recommend Week, based on workshops between the team and City staff, considering feed- back from the public during Imagine Week and other outreach events. The scenarios for analysis defined by the Study Team are outlined in Figure 1.13. The transportation improvements outlined and analyzed in this document are intended to support the level of development envisioned in each scenario. It is not necessary to realize the full scale of development envisioned in each scenario; rather, the scenarios offer guidance on the character and level of transpor- tation investment that might be required to support the corre- sponding level of investment. The following section describes the scenarios, including the scale of development, timeframe for such development, and key enhancements that could be deliv- ered to support such development. In developing and evaluating the scenarios, the Study Team sought to incorporate, understand, and address both the tech- nical needs of the network as well as community, stakeholder, and agency concerns. The chosen evaluation metrics are in- tended to inform a discussion of trade-offs where they exist, so that all involved have an understanding of network performance for all users, rather than prioritizing any one type of travel or development. Finally, the metrics were designed to be measur- able across the various scenarios, so that staff and stakeholders could understand how the network would perform and change over time. With all of this information compiled together, the Figure 1.13 Scenarios for analysis in the Grandview District Transportation Study. Scenario Timeframe Development Scale Existing Conditions Current Current Existing Conditions + Early Action Items 0-2 years Current Short Term Changes 2-5 years 30 dwelling units per acre Mid Term Changes 5-15 years 60 dwelling units per acre Long Term Changes 15-30 years 120 dwelling units per acre Figure 1.12 Example of an unmarked crosswalk within the District. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 11 Settings + Context1 Figure 1.14 Example of discontinuous pedestrian facilities and unmarked crosswalks within the District. Oversized highway on- and off-ramps occupy a large amount of space that could be better utilized if re-allocated into developable parcels. parties could best understand what to expect of the network and assess whether and when to pursue changes. To this end, the Study Team proposed a combination of metrics that demonstrate changes in safety, mobility, connectivity, and access. The metrics evaluated include: • Number of vehicle trips (District-wide) • Average vehicle delay (District-wide, and at key intersec- tions) • Average vehicle speed (District-wide) • Access to parking • Pedestrian connectivity (% of sidewalks that are continu- ous) • Pedestrian crossing experience (% of crosswalks that are marked) (Figure 1.12 and Figure 1.14) • Bicycle connectivity (% of marked routes that are contin- uous) • Access to transit The evaluation includes both qualitative and quantitative mea- sures. The primary sources of data for evaluating performance across these metrics include: • Trip generation and traffic operations analysis • Conceptual designs • Data and case studies of other complete streets proj- ects in similar settings • Stakeholder and community outreach There was some discussion as to whether one goal might be more important than others, i.e. pedestrian safety or traffic flow; however, the goal of this effort is to support mobility and development for everyone circulating to, from, and within the Grandview District. No one metric outshined another. As a result no weighting is assigned to individual metrics or modes. The evaluation of these metrics are described in greater detail in Chapter 4, with a deeper technical discussion of the traffic analysis in Appendix 3. With each scenario and as more projects are implemented, performance of the transportation network would improve, and the network would become increasingly supportive of the type of fu- ture envisioned for the Grandview District. A more de- tailed discussion of the elements included in each scenario are discussed in Chapter 3. CHAPTER Short Term Changes Mid Term Changes Long Term Changes Far Term Changes Timeline for Change 2 Figure 2.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan developed through the Grandview District Transportation Study. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST IN T E R LACH EN B L VD 50T H S T 2 14 Timeline for Change Figure 2.2 Proposed Short Term Changes to the Grandview District transportation network. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOODRD53RD ST 52ND ST IN T E R LACH EN B L VD Jerry’s Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50TH ST Potential Short Term Project Changes in the short-term (Figure 2.2) focus on transporta- tion improvements that can be implemented within two to five years, building on early action items already contemplated. Early action items are potential low-cost improvements that could be implemented with minimal construction, permitting, or approval within the next two years. The following items have been iden- tified as potential early action items: • Begin rationalizing highway on/off ramps: • Remove free right from southbound Highway 100 exit onto Vernon Avenue • Remove free right to northbound Highway 100 en- trance from W. 50th Street • New signal at Jerry’s to facilitate pedestrian crossings and left-turn movements These improvements are intended to demonstrate the City’s proactive dedication to implementing critical pedestrian safety improvements and to advancing Grandview residents’ and busi- nesses’ vision of a more connected, accessible District for all travelers, residents, and shoppers. The short-term improvements target the following changes: • Continue implementing key pedestrian safety improve- ments • Set the stage for mid-term transportation investments Short Term Changes Right-In/ Right-Out Average modeled development density 30 dwelling units per acre Timeline 2-5 years Potential Early Action Item Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 15 Figure 2.3 Diagrams of proposed improvements for walking and biking access, auto circulation and parking, and transit access and enhancements. Diagrams were developed during the Imagine Week phase of the Transportation Study. EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 WALKING AND BIKING ACCESS EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 5 6 7 8 1 1 1 2 2 AUTO CIRCULATION AND PARKING EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 9 TRANSIT ACCESS AND ENHANCEMENTS LEGEND CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION Short Term Changes 1. New controlled intersections with pedestrian crossings and coordinated light timing 2 . Restore pedestrian circulation across removed highway ramp free-right turns 3. Improve pedestrian crossings on Eden Avenue 4. Create pedestrian-safe path by former Public Works Site 5. Right-in/right-out driveway by Edina Liquor Store 6. Create access from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s 7. Improve Arcadia Avenue by former Public Works Site 8. Develop district parking strategy 9 . Improve existing bus stop and turn-around facilities – seat- ing, shelter, heat lamps, real-time information, etc. 2 16 Timeline for Change • Begin to rationalize motorist access points in order to bet- ter manage traffic flow • Improve access to parcels currently in the development pipeline, such as the school bus lot and former Public Works site • Begin the process of improving transit facilities to encour- age use by working with Metro Transit to provide more comfortable waiting areas and safe walking and biking routes to those stops. • Support the goals of Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets by incorporating those criti- cal design principles into every applicable project. • Incorporate best management practices for sustainabil- ity and resiliency into every applicable project, including stormwater solutions, materials selection, incorporation of greenspace, energy efficiency, reduction of heat island effects, and support for all modes and abilities. Note that each scenario is cumulative, so the Short-Term Changes scenario includes all early action items (Figure 2.3). This provides the greatest flexibility, and allows the City to advance any of these improvements as conditions change or as funding becomes available. Costs were developed for the Short Term projects, in order to support current Capital Investment Planning (CIP). The follow- ing estimates for cost and schedule are for planning purposes only and do not constitute a formal engineer’s estimate: • Vernon Avenue Intersection Improvements at Eden Avenue • Timeframe: 2018 • Cost: $100,000 • Vernon Avenue & Southbound Highway 100 Exit Ramp Free Right Removal • Timeframe: 2019 • Cost: $350,000 • Vernon Avenue Intersections Improvements – Interlachen & Jerry’s • Timeframe: 2019 • Cost: $750,000 • Arcadia Avenue Improvements • Timeframe: 2019 • Cost: $450,000 • 50th Street & Northbound Highway 100 Entrance Ramp Free Right Removal • Timeframe: 2020 • Cost: $250,000 • New Street to Jerry’s Foods from Eden Avenue • Timeframe: 2020 • Cost: $280,000 Analysis of all the Short Term improvements and the resulting transportation network performance are further described in Chapter 4, Transportation Analysis. Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 17 Figure 2.4 A pedestrian crossing at a location with no marked crosswalks, while a driver prepares to make a right turn into traffic. 2 18 Timeline for Change Figure 2.5 Proposed Mid Term Changes to the Grandview District transportation network. In the Short Term Changes scenario, the plan aims to address critical connections, key safety improvements, and simplify mo- torist access to the local and regional network. Changes in the Mid Term (Figure 2.5), however, focus on transportation im- provements that can be implemented in five to 15 years and build on the enhancements made in the Short-Term. Improvements in the Mid Term Changes scenario are intended to reestablish multi-modal connections and enable development that fits into the local vision for the Grandview District. Though all of the improvements in the Framework Plan are seen as crit- ical, the enhancements in the Mid Term recognize that timeline to assemble adequate funding, to address the required approv- als processes, and to coordinate with local, regional, and state agency partners. The Mid Term improvements target the following changes (Fig- ure 2.6): • Establish critical, continuous bicycling connections • Re-establish pedestrian connections Mid Term Changes City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100EDEN A V E 53RD ST 52ND ST Jerry’s Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50TH ST Reconfigured intersection and lot GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOODRDIN T E R LACH EN B L VD Average modeled development density 60 dwelling units per acre Timeline 5-15 years Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 19 Figure 2.6 Diagrams of proposed improvements for walking and biking access, auto circulation and parking, and transit access and enhancements. Diagrams were developed during the Imagine Week phase of the Transportation Study. EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 WALKING AND BIKING ACCESS 1 1 4 4 5 EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 5 6 7 AUTO CIRCULATION AND PARKING 6 6 6 7 8 9 10 EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 11 TRANSIT ACCESS AND ENHANCEMENTS LEGEND CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION Mid Term Changes 1. Create separated bike lanes and pedestrian paths on Vernon Ave- nue and Eden Avenue 2. Improve pedestrian circulation by Jerry’s and general retail 3. Create activation zones along streetfront of Vernon Avenue 4. Add more pedestrian crossings on Vernon Avenue 5. Expand walk/bike connections within district interior and improve circulation 6. “Right-sizing” design for Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue 7. Integrate highway ramp circulation with district street network 8. Develop district parking strategy 9 . Free-right turns replaced with controlled intersection onto Highway 100 northbound 10. Remove northbound looping ramp 11. Transit schedule and frequency improvements 2 20 Timeline for Change • Continue rationalizing motorist access points in order to better manage traffic flow, especially the intersection of Eden and Vernon which is described in more detail in Chap- ter 3, Section 7 “Grandview Neighborhood.” • Unlock new parcels for long-term development, open space, or public use • Set the stage for long-term transportation investments • Improve the character of Vernon by creating “activation zones” of increased, though possibly transient, use immedi- ately adjacent to the sidewalks. • Continue the process of improving transit facilities to en- courage use by working with Metro Transit to relocate the bus stop at Eden and Vernon when that intersection is re- constructed, by providing more accessible park-and-ride facilities as parking is constructed throughout the area, and by adjusting service schedules and types to meet increasing demand. • Support the goals of Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets by incorporating those critical design principles into every applicable project. • Continue to incorporate best management practices for sustainability and resiliency into every applicable project, including stormwater solutions, materials selection, incor- poration of greenspace, energy efficiency, reduction of heat island effects, and support for all modes and abilities. Note that each scenario is cumulative, so the Mid Term Changes scenario includes all early action items and Short Term improve- ments. This provides the greatest flexibility, and allows the City to advance any of these improvements as conditions change or as funding becomes available. Analysis of these improvements are further described in Chapter 4, Transportation Analysis. Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 21 Figure 2.7 Existing pedestrian and bus facilities on Vernon Avenue. 2 22 Timeline for Change Figure 2.8 Proposed Long Term Changes to the Grandview District transportation network. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100EDEN A V E 53RD ST 52ND ST Jerry’s Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50TH ST These improvements are intended to complete the vision of the Framework Plan, establishing the character and scale for devel- opment of the plan and the necessary transportation improve- ments that can support such development. Though the Long Term Changes scenario envisions a grand scale of development over several decades, it also describes the requisite transpor- tation investments that should be in place when that level of development is pursued (Figure 2.8). The Long Term improvements target the following changes: • Complete key pedestrian and bicycle connections • Complete simplification of highway access • Facilitate high-capacity transit connections • Support delivery of the Framework Plan • Outline character of ongoing development and transporta- tion improvements • Improve the character of Vernon by creating “activation zones” of increased, though possibly transient, use immedi- ately adjacent to the sidewalks. • Continue the process of improving transit facilities to en- Long Term Changes GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOODRDIN T E R LACH EN B L VD Average modeled development density 120 dwelling units per acre Timeline 15-30 years Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 23 Figure 2.9 Diagrams of proposed improvements for walking and biking access, auto circulation and parking, and transit access and enhancements. Diagrams were developed during the Imagine Week phase of the Transportation Study. EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * 1 2 WALKING AND BIKING ACCESS EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * 4 5 3 4 AUTO CIRCULATION AND PARKING EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * * * 6 7 8 TRANSIT ACCESS AND ENHANCEMENTS 6 LEGEND CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION Long Term Changes 1. Complete walk/bike connections within district interior 2 . Pedestrian and bike bridge across Highway 100 3. Remove unsafe segment of road 4. New off-ramp frontage road system 5. Complete street network within district interior 6 . Proposed transit center locations to serve both rail and bus users 7. New bus stop and turn-around in conjunction with transit center 8. Potential for high capacity transit through the district 2 24 Timeline for Change courage use by working with Metro Transit to enhance and maintain bus stops, add a transit center, and adjust service schedules and types to meet increasing demand. • Support the goals of Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets by incorporat- ing those critical design principles into every applicable project. • Continue to incorporate best management practices for sustainability and resiliency into every applicable project, including stormwater solutions, materials se- lection, incorporation of greenspace, energy efficien- cy, reduction of heat island effects, and support for all modes and abilities. The Long Term Changes scenario (Figure 2.9) delivers on the vision for the Grandview District described in the Framework Plan. It envisions all major components of the Framework Plan in a way that respects its setting with- in Edina, and allows for safe multi-modal connections to, through, and within the District. The transportation im- provements envisioned and analyzed in this document are intended to support the level of development envisioned in each scenario. They are also intended to denote a level of trans- portation investment that will support and facilitate the scale of development considered in the Framework Plan. Analysis of the performance of these improvements are further described in Chapter 4. The Long Term Changes scenario is the culmination of that vi- sion in many ways, though it is not necessarily the end game. Each scenario takes a substantial step towards the Long Term goal for the Grandview District and sets up the ability grow beyond this scenario, within key parameters. The next section of this chapter describes additional infrastructure and land use improvements for the District. These are more substantial than what might be delivered in the readily foreseeable future. How- ever, the community acknowledges that such a future exists. The Far Term Changes scenario therefore describes the Dis- trict vision in the event that more substantial funding becomes available or more intense, more rapid development occurs, and sets the tone for improvements that may be beyond the scope of this analysis. Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 25 Figure 2.10 Existing Eden Avenue bridge over Highway 100. 2 EDENVERNON 50T H HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50THST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 0’ 100’ 200’ 300’ N 26 Timeline for Change Figure 2.11 Possible Far Term Changes to the Grandview District and transportation network. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100EDEN A V E 52ND ST Jerry’s Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50TH ST The concept sketch plan, above (Figure 2.11), suggests a Far Term future characterized by full district build-out through the strategic, phased development of vacant, underutilized, or newly available property along both sides of the Highway 100 corridor. Generally, a thoughtful evaluation of this scenario indicated that several significant elements would have to occur, perhaps simul- taneously, in order for this, or similar outcomes, to be realized including: • Reconfigured and/or eliminated redundancies in the High- way 100 and Vernon Avenue interchange ramps, setting the stage for a feasible real estate transaction (land deal) that would ensure adjacent properties are available for future development; • Construction of a “Grandview Crossing” (defined in the 2012 Framework Plan), a proposed connection over High- way 100, with design ideas ranging from a simple, but spa- cious, pedestrian and bicycle bridge, to a “Freeway Lid” spanning between Vernon and Eden Avenues (further dis- cussion of the crossing is provided in Chapter 3, Section 9); • Realization of enhanced transit serving this district, includ- ing additional local and regional service related to Highway 100 (perhaps BRT), but also taking advantage of the existing rail corridor pursuing either Light Rail or Modern Streetcar options. Far Term Changes GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEIN T E R LACH EN B L VD Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 27 Completion of these three major influences would signal the re-start of focused debate and pursuit of detailed district plan- ning strategies that necessarily accept increased density as an outcome. As previously stated, this plan doesn’t advocate for increasing density, only examines its potential impacts to the transportation network. Far term projections are beyond the bounds of predictive modeling, but given the traffic predicted in the Mid and Long Terms, it is anticipated that some form of high-capacity commuter transit service would be required to meet the demands of this Far Term scenario. Change over a much longer time frame, i.e. the “Far Term,” would not only be measured in additional housing units, but would also provide opportunities to implement, or even require the implementation of, the following district-wide changes: • A connected public realm on both sides of Highway 100, including additional green space with an emphasis on pe- destrian and bicycle amenities; • An innovative, multi-system, stacked infrastructure with emphasis on long term cost savings and sustainability; • A greater mix of local service and convenience venues with emphasis on unique district character and nearby neigh- borhood needs; • And an exemplary precedent-setting, district-scale re- development approach with emphasis on 21st Century city-building principles and City of Edina objectives. This study acknowledges the complexities, and unpredictability, of long range strategic thinking, but chooses to include this sim- ple diagram as a means to keep broader concepts on the radar as many of the Short Term planning objectives take center-stage in the next phases of district development. No traffic analysis or other more detailed planning was conducted for this term as part of this study. Figure 3.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan showing Focus Areas throughout the Grandview District and beyond. CHAPTER Introduction 1 – Jerry’s Connection from Eden 2 – Arcadia + Public Works Site 3 – School Bus Site + New Ramp 4 – Vernon Avenue & W. 50th St. 5 – Interlachen Boulevard 6 – Eden Avenue Focus Areas 3 7 – Grandview Neighborhood 8 – Highway Access 9 – Highway 100 Ped/Bike Bridge 10 – Transit Center 11 – Our Lady of Grace 12 – Beyond Study Area City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST INTERLACHEN BLVD 50T H S T 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 11 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 (12) (12) 30 Focus Areas 3 Introduction Within the overall framework of the phased implementation approach described in the previous chapter, there are many ar- eas of specific interest. They can’t be considered as separate projects, because the function of the system depends on an in- terconnected set of improvements, but they do deserve specific attention in order to fully explore their intention and detail in the larger context. All the proposed improvements incorporate many important changes that will better align the network with the goals of Living Streets, Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and sustainability. Just as the system is interconnected, all of the projects have impacts on multiple modes of travel, though some might appear to be street or transit oriented. For instance, the pedestrian bridge over Highway 100 does not just act as a walkway. It also encourages the perception of comfort and safety for pe- destrians in the District to intentionally shift use from autos to pedestrians and bikes. This study did not assume a change in behavior from autos to other modes in order to “solve” the traffic issues, but it intended to complement conservative traffic estimates with substantive improvements to the experience of those other modes so that actual performance would exceed modeled expectations. Because of this multi-modal, interconnected approach, the focus areas described in this chapter may seem numerous or even scattered. They are therefore organized by anticipated time- line, rather than mode or geography. The Study Team explored known opportunities for improvements or redevelopment in order to approximate time frames, as shown in the previous chapters. This chapter perpetuates that time-based approach, even though it is subject to the ever-changing winds of political and economic change. If opportunities arise earlier than an- ticipated, our analysis shows that there is very rarely, if ever, a reason to hold back a project to fit this timeline, though there may be good reasons to move a project forward. In almost every case, momentum towards positive change is the primary incentive for investment. It is also important to recognize that this study only frames proposed changes. In all cases, more de- tailed design, engineering, and public process are required for implementation. Figure 3.2 Existing connection from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s Foods, looking north from Eden Avenue. Figure 3.3 Existing connection from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s Foods. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 31 Focus Areas3 1 – Jerry’s Connection from Eden Figure 3.4 Plan of a new pedestrian and vehicular connection from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s; 1” = 200’. Jerry’s A The current connection from Eden Avenue to Jerry’s Foods is a space that is poorly defined and unwelcoming to people wish- ing to access the commercial area from the south (Figure 3.2 and Figure 3.3). Because the Edina Senior Center, Edina Library, and the Grandview Square offices and residences are located directly south of Eden Avenue, a low-stress and legible route to and from this shopping destination is important to the overall connectivity of the Grandview District. Presently, people walking or on bicycles who approach Jerry’s from the south must cross Eden Avenue at an intersection that is poorly seen by eastbound motorists due to the curve in Link Road. Once across Eden, people are required to walk or ride a bicycle through two parking lots currently lacking sidewalks and a clearly-defined streetscape before reaching Jerry’s (Figure 3.2). A new connection (Figure 3.4) is recommended to improve ac- cessibility and safety for this corridor. The cross section in Fig- ure 3.5 illustrates the allocation of shared space for motorists and bicyclists, while providing off-street sidewalks for people walking separated by a planted boulevard. On-street parking is shown on both sides of the new connection (Figure 3.5) and reconfiguration of the off-street parking around Edina Family Physicians makes it possible to reduce parking very little while improving access substantially. Like other changes in this study, EDEN A V E LI N K R D Figure 3.5 Section A: Typical Internal Street Section this change would require cooperation between multiple land- owners (primarily Jerry’s) and the City of Edina. Despite the challenges of these kinds of partnerships, this is one of several connections that are critical to weaving together an intercon- nected transportation system. At the intersections along the corridor, high-visibility continen- tal crosswalks are recommended to improve this connection for those who walk along this corridor. In addition, curb exten- sions (bulb-outs) are proposed to increase pedestrian visibility and shorten the distance a person must walk between side- walks. Further discussed in Section 7, it is proposed that, in the future, a small portion of Link Road between Grandview and Vernon (between the Super America and BP service stations) be eliminated and Eden Avenue be straightened, helping to improve the sight lines for eastbound automobile traffic on Eden. 32 Focus Areas 3 2 – Arcadia + Former Public Works Redevelopment Site The former Public Works site at the intersection of Eden Av- enue and Arcadia Avenue has been proposed for a variety of uses since the City moved the Public Works operations from the site to the Cahill Industrial Park in 2010 and demolished the old building in 2013. The Grandview Framework Plan imagined a mix of public and private uses on the site. The primary uses consisted of housing and a community center and incorporated an outdoor plaza, all on top of multiple layers of parking, taking advantage of the existing topography. In 2014 and 2015, the City partnered with Frauenshuh Com- mercial Real Estate to determine how a mix of public and pri- vate uses could fit on the site. Most recently, the City Council initiated a community center study that determined a more defined program and conceptual layout for the community cen- ter component of the site. The community center design team from HGA worked closely with the Grandview District Trans- portation Study Team in an effort to coordinate transportation elements with the community center program. HGA’s concept for the community center was used as a basis for understanding the potential transportation system impacts of the redevelopment, with the understanding that it represents the current thinking of the time and not necessarily the final design of the project (Figure 3.6). Figure 3.6 Concept plan for Community Center and proposed residential development. Image credit: HGA Architects and Engineers. ARCADIA AVE EDEN AVE City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 33 Focus Areas3 The Transportation Study anticipates rebuilding Arcadia Avenue in the Short Term from the frontage road access south to Eden Avenue as part of the construction of a redevelopment project on the former Public Works site (Figures 3.7 and 3.8). In that stretch, Arcadia would have one 10’ travel lane in each direction with separated bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the street (See Figures 3.9 and 3.11). Reconstruction would also “square” the intersection of Arcadia and Eden to be more legi- ble. Together, these changes would support the vehicular traffic needing to access parking as part of the redevelopment, as well as deliveries and other heavier traffic, while supporting bike and pedestrian connectivity along Arcadia. In the longer term, Arcadia Avenue north of the frontage road intersection would be the first leg of a “four-legged” shared street (Figure 3.9 and 3.10), at its intersection with a new east- west connection through the District. A shared street allows for the movement of vehicles, but importantly encouraging pe- destrian movement and offering opportunities for public gath- erings (Figures 3.12 and 3.13). This shared street intersection would form a new, pedestrian-oriented core for the commercial zone at the center of the Grandview District. The important bike facilities to the north and south are strengthened in the shared street section because they take precedence over auto traffic and support increased visibility and use. The new east-west connector street that forms the other part of that shared street intersection, will be built on the north side of the former Public Works site, crossing over the railroad tracks, providing a critical link between Vernon Avenue on the west (just south of the Walgreen’s site) and the new frontage road on the west side of Highway 100. Over time, this Study anticipates the properties along the north side of this street to redevelop with buildings facing the street. In the short term, public concerns about traffic and parking related to existing businesses may require a regulatory response and approach to existing shared parking facilities. The new east-west connector street will be built at an elevation Figure 3.7 Arcadia Avenue steeply rising on right, adjacent to the former Public Works site. 34 Focus Areas 3 B EDEN A V E Figure 3.8 Approximate location of future Community Center entrance, on right. Jerry’s Parking Ramp ARCADIA AVEHWY 100VERNON AVEFormer Public Works Redevelopment Site C that matches the current elevation of Arcadia Avenue and the upper entrance to the public parking ramp behind Jerry’s office building. The lower level entrance to the public ramp will need to be blocked off, with a new lower level entrance planned from the south side along Brookside Avenue (see the School District Site + New Ramp focus area section for more information). Figure 3.9 Plan of the new proposed Community Center and redevelopment on the former Public Works site, with a shared street along Arcadia Avenue and the new east/west pedestrian and vehicular connection north of the site; 1” = 200’. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 35 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.10 Section B: Shared Street on Arcadia Avenue. Figure 3.11 Section C: Street Section for southern end of Arcadia Avenue. Figure 3.12 Example of a shared street. Photo credit: http://nacto.org/ publication/urban-street-design-guide/streets/commercial-shared-street/ Figure 3.13 Example of a shared street. Photo credit: https://voakl. net/2013/11/21/fort-street-transformation/ 36 Focus Areas 3 Figure 3.14 Plan of a new district parking network around and behind Jerry’s; 1” = 200’. EDEN A V EVERNON AVE52ND ST 200 PARKING SPACES (188 EXISTING) Jerry’s New Development 276 EXISTING PUBLIC PARK- ING SPACES 229 NEW PUBLIC PARKING SPACES 3 – School Bus Site + New Ramp As mentioned in the Arcadia focus area section, the new east- west connector street on the north side of the former Public Works site will be built at an elevation that matches the cur- rent elevation of Arcadia Avenue and the upper entrance to the public parking ramp behind Jerry’s office building (Figure 3.16). This allows enough clearance to cross the railroad right-of-way (ROW), but eliminates the ability to access the lower level en- trance to the public ramp. The proposed solution to access the lower level of the public ramp is part of a circulation and parking strategy which will create a continuous loop from the south side of Jerry’s along the new 52nd Street connection, across the top level of a new parking ramp on the north side of the School District prop- erty (Figure 3.14 to Figure 3.16). That drive then continues at an upper level above Brookside Avenue directly into the lower level of the existing public parking ramp. A new speed ramp above the loading area between Jerry’s and the public ramp will provide a more direct connection between the two ramp levels, allowing vehicles to circulate continuously from the new east- west connector street to the new 52nd Street elevations. The topography on the School Bus site drops enough to allow a lower level exit from the new parking structure onto Brookside Avenue with direct access to Eden Avenue (Figure 3.16). All of the existing truck access to Jerry’s loading docks and the City water treatment plant remain in place under the new second level circulation route. Currently, there is a conflict between some of the large pipes and ducts under the ramp and the ma- neuvering space for large trucks, but early investigations suggest that those conflicts can be resolved. This parking and circulation strategy places a significant number of parking spots (276 existing / 229 additional / 505 total public parking spaces) in close proximity to Jerry’s businesses and to future development opportunities. It might also serve to relieve pressure from transit and employee parking for existing nearby businesses. This solution will require the cooperation and ded- ication of some property from the City, the School District (or its potential future owner), and Jerry’s Enterprises, but will be a net gain for all three parties in terms of efficient use of land to gain significant parking and circulation improvements. For example, the School District property could potentially have a much higher development density with this shared parking strategy than it could ever achieve on one stand-alone parcel.BROOKSIDE RAILROAD City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 37 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.15 3D model of district parking ramp south and east of Jerry’s. Figure 3.16 3D model of district parking ramp south and east of Jerry’s. Jerry’s New Development (Potential for vertical expansion) EDEN A V E EDEN AVE VERNON A V E BROO K SI D E R AI L R O A D Jerry’s Municipal Ramp New Development (Potential for vertical expansion) To Jerry’s Parki n g L o t To Lower Le v el P a r ki n g To Mu n i c i p a l R a m p To Transit C e nter Senior Center and Library, when coupled with the other im- provements on that site described in Section 7 of this chapter. In addition, a pedestrian connection from the second story of the School District site, over the railroad to the redeveloped Public Works site, would allow complete connectivity for users of the redeveloped sites, commuters, and other residents and customers. This might also offer some relief for parking at the 38 Focus Areas 3 4 – Vernon Avenue & W. 50th Street Figure 3.17 Plan of a reconfigured Vernon Avenue; 1” = 200’. D E Jerry’s VERNON AVETravel along Vernon Avenue varies, depending on your vantage point. As the years have progressed, spot treatments to ad- dress a variety of different issues have left travelers feeling that the street, much like the District, has lost its character. The pedestrian experience is marked by narrow or discontinuous sidewalks and wide or difficult crossings. In addition, there are fewer pedestrian crossing opportunities along Vernon Avenue, which encourages unsafe jaywalking and discourages pedestri- ans from taking otherwise short trips to shop for groceries at Jerry’s or travel to bingo at the Senior Center. Though there are bike lanes just south of the area, this route is unmarked with- in the District, offering little connectivity or protection from traffic. Depending on the time of day, motorists experience comfortable, unimpeded travel (sometimes even excessively fast) or slow-moving congestion. These variations can cause challenging traffic patterns, particularly during peak times or at turn locations. In the Short Term, several improvements along Vernon, includ- ing a new controlled intersection at Jerry’s with a pedestrian crossing and elimination of the free-right turns at the High- way 100 ramps, are considered Early Action Items because of their impacts on pedestrian safety and connectivity. This study doesn’t advocate for immediately striping a bike lane along Ver- non because it would not adequately address safety issues and therefore it is recommended to accelerate reconstruction rath- er than create a temporary situation that encourages use that can’t be safely accommodated. The Grandview District Framework Plan contemplates a “com- plete streets” treatment on Vernon Avenue, where all modes of travel are safely accommodated along the roadway. In order to accomplish this goal, the Framework envisioned a “road diet” on Vernon Avenue, but was somewhat silent on the likely con- figuration for narrowing the roadway. Traffic volumes vary along the route, from under 15,000 vehicles/day southwest of Inter- lachen to over 20,000 vehicles/day east of Interlachen, where it transitions to 50th Street with highway-bound traffic. Nonethe- less, these volumes can typically be accommodated in one lane of travel, with special attention to peak-hour volumes and turn- ing movements that might otherwise slow down through traffic, hinder transit operations, or introduce conflicts with crossing pedestrians or cyclists. With this in mind, the Study Team developed two options that convert the existing 4-lane cross section (2 lanes in each direc- tion) to a 2-lane cross section with an alternating median (Fig- ure 3.17). This is typically considered a 4-to-3 conversion, since the median (Figure 3.18) can act as a two-way-left-turn-lane where warranted (Figure 3.19). For areas west of Interlachen, this configuration is adequate for the traffic volumes, and would dramatically improve the experience of bikers and pedestrians, however the public already perceives that traffic back-ups are problematic in this area. Therefore, it is important that other improvements of this study, such as intersection spacing and an 52ND ST City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 39 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.18 Section D: Vernon Avenue with median. Figure 3.19 Section E: Vernon Avenue without median. interconnected network of streets, be implemented in step with this change. The median is configured with a surmountable curb, a strip of concrete paving on both sides, no trees, and possibly a “grass- pave” system so that emergency vehicles can use the median to get around traffic if necessary. With heavier volumes east of Interlachen, there would be a transition to 4 travel lanes ap- proaching this intersection. These cross sections show how the 4-to-3 conversion would create space for a one-way separated bike lane in each direc- tion, as well as additional sidewalk width for pedestrians. This configuration of Vernon would also offer sufficient space for a landscaped strip that would return some greenery to the cor- ridor, provide some protection from the elements, and act as a snow storage zone in winter months. This solution was favored because it creates a separated bike facility and addresses snow storage and other maintenance issues. This approach was fa- vored by both stakeholders and city staff. The bike lane should be differentiated from the sidewalk by material and signage de- sign. Together all of these elements would improve pedestrian and cyclist safety and comfort, maintain safe traffic operations along Vernon, and provide opportunities for landscaping ele- ments that would make Vernon a more comfortable, inviting place to traverse and visit. These changes would likely require a combination of detailed engineering and design, permitting, restriping, and the construc- tion of medians, raised bike lanes, and curbs. It will also require coordination with agency partners, including Hennepin County. Analysis of the complete streets reconfiguration of Vernon Ave- nue is included in the Mid Term Changes scenario (5-15 years). 40 Focus Areas 3 Figure 3.20 Section F: Vernon Avenue/50th Street, 5-lane configuration. New Development VERN O N A V E / 5 0 T H S T R E E T HIGHWAY 100F Figure 3.21 Plan of Vernon Avenue/50th Street reconfiguration; 1” = 200’. We anticipate that it could occur on the earlier end of that timeline, if not sooner. This element of the Framework Plan also continues the existing bike lanes south of Sherwood/53rd Street north to Interlachen, and sets the stage for further con- tinuity along 50th Street in the Long Term. East of Interlachen, traffic volumes require five traffic lanes — two through-lanes in each direction and a center turn lane which can also be utilized as a median (Figure 3.20 and Figure 3.21). This expanded section is shown in the Long Term scenar- io, since it requires replacing the existing bridge with a wider one. The wider bridge will accommodate the desired bike and pedestrian connections, complementing the pedestrian/bike bridge and Eden Avenue connections to create a complete net- work. The area around City Hall is also reconfigured to support more regular intersection spacing and multi-modal connections. The new on-ramps are described in Section 8 of this chapter and the pedestrian bridge that forms a spine to the building’s front door is described in Section 9. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 41 Focus Areas3 5 – Interlachen Boulevard The Interlachen Boulevard intersection serves as the primary access to the Grandview District and Highway 100 for residents of Hilldale, Highlands, and other neighborhoods to the west. This one lane road in each direction with bike lanes, widens to two lanes and a turn lane at the intersection with Vernon Ave- nue (Figure 3.23 and Figure 3.24). It is the only marked crossing for pedestrians for several blocks, and acts as a connection for cyclists, despite the lack of bike lanes to receive them once they cross to Gus Young or turn along Vernon Avenue / 50th Street. In recent months and years, the City has made ongoing im- provements to Interlachen, including extending the bike lanes and sidewalk treatment to the edge of the intersection (Figure 3.22). The intersection at Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue/50th Street carries the highest traffic volumes in the district, save for the Highway 100 interchanges. Modest changes in signal timing and access to Gus Young, coupled with improve- ments at nearby intersections, can help manage traffic flow or at least reduce the frustration that some drivers feel as they traverse the Interlachen intersection. As the District grows, it may be tempting to reconstruct this intersection entirely—a substantial investment in budget, time, and impact—however the team first sought to understand how this intersection is used and how traffic patterns flow to and through the District via Interlachen. Traffic flow at Interlachen can be improved by noting the origins and ultimate destination of travelers in the area. Improvements Figure 3.22 Plan of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard intersection, showing redeveloped parcels on the northwest and northeast corners; 1” = 200’.New DevelopmentVERNON AVEIN T E R LACH EN B L VD BROOK S I D E A V E Figure 3.23 Intersection of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, looking north. Figure 3.24 Bike facilities on Interlachen Boulevard are not clearly marked. 42 Focus Areas 3 that will benefit this intersection include: • Retiming the signal at Interlachen to shift more green time to movements between Interlachen and 50th Street. Im- plementing the complete streets project on Vernon will help in this regard, as it will shorten the crossing distance, returning valuable seconds to other necessary movements. Analysis of this intervention is included in the early action items and Short Term Changes scenario. • Creating a new signal at Jerry’s, with a dedicated signal phase and turn pocket. This will encourage southbound left-turning vehicles to use that new intersection, rather than slowing down through-traffic waiting behind them, creating queues at the Interlachen intersection. Analysis of this improvement is included in the early action items and Short Term Changes scenario. • Reopening additional routes (52nd St), and improving the operations of their intersection with Vernon (53rd St). Lack of alternate access/egress for neighborhoods west of Vernon forces drivers to use Interlachen in greater num- bers than they might otherwise do. Analysis of this im- provement is included in the Mid Term Changes scenario. • New crossings and bicycle facilities along Vernon (Figure 3.25 and Figure 3.26). Lack of pedestrian access across Ver- non, and bicycle access along it, forces shoppers to drive to locations like Jerry’s, Starbucks, etc. Providing alternatives to driving to nearby locations will help encourage some travelers to leave their cars behind when they can. Analysis of this improvement is included in Mid Term Changes. The changes at Interlachen should be seen as a suite of interven- tions. No single intervention will create a substantial improve- ment in intersection operations for this location by itself; this is a case where the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Separately these changes have a small, though contributing im- pact on the function of this intersection. When all of these interventions are implemented, the synergy created would be substantial enough that it could likely delay reconstruction of the intersection by many years, if not decades, depending on the pace of development and the neighborhood’s tolerance of the trade offs. Reconstruction of the Interlachen/50th/Vernon intersection, for example, would be a costly endeavor lasting Figure 3.25 Example of a pedestrian-friendly crosswalk. Photo credit: Carl Sundstrom. Figure 3.26 Example of a pedestrian-friendly crosswalk. Photo credit: NACTO. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 43 Focus Areas3 many months or more, and may not be necessary as these other improvements are pursued. Over time, however, it may become necessary to consider re- construction of the intersection at Interlachen/50th/Vernon. Development beyond the District may impact traffic patterns in this area, or land uses on the existing corner parcels may change in the future. At present, Interlachen Boulevard widens at the intersection, in order to accommodate a turn lane in the eastbound direction. If the intersection were reconstructed to alleviate future congestion, the greatest need is likely an addi- tional left-turn lane, allowing two dedicated left-turn lanes. However, the project must also consider how and where to transition to the typical one-lane cross section going north along Interlachen. Moreover, such an investment should also consider the need for wider, more comfortable bike lanes and improved pedestrian connections. The combination of all these factors could add 28 feet or more to the right of way for a turn lane (10’), bike lanes (6’ each), plus additional sidewalk space and landscaping (and additional 6’ or more). The right of way is not sufficient to accommodate additional lanes without acquiring additional land from neighboring parcels on either the south or north side of Interlachen. Rather than initiating such a change, reconstruction might in- stead be timed with any potential plans for redevelopment of parcels at this intersection, if pursued. This study also contem- plated the possibility of a roundabout for this intersection, but given the existing and projected traffic volumes, the roundabout size would be disruptive to both the scale of the district to the connectivity goals for pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Additional improvements in the vicinity of this intersection in- clude: • Short Term: Rationalizing access to customer parking for Walgreen’s/Edina Liquor. This can be accomplished through delineators on Gus Young Lane that restrict left turns into and out of the parking area. This will reinforce right-in/ right-out movements, reduce queuing, and further encour- age use of other intersections. This intervention could also be implemented as an early action item if there is a desire to do so. • Long Term: Redevelopment of the corner parcel (existing Edina Liquor and Walgreen’s building). The Framework Plan contemplates a new street grid in the District, with a new street from Vernon Avenue to Arcadia Avenue between the existing Jerry’s and Walgreen’s parcels. Unfortunately, the physical space is not quite wide enough to accommodate a typical, vehicular street. Redeveloping this parcel, when the time is right, would create an opportunity to establish in- ternal circulation connected to existing streets. This would also enable more active frontage on Vernon, which is a core principle of good urban design and a strong pedestrian en- vironment. 44 Focus Areas 3 H 6 – Eden Avenue As one of the primary corridors connecting Grandview to the surrounding neighborhoods, Eden Avenue plays a significant role in the overall transportation network in Edina. Currently, the design of Eden Avenue prioritizes motorized ve- hicle movement; there are no bicycle facilities and the corridor has limited sidewalk space (Figure 3.27 and Figure 3.28). In ad- dition, there are several intersections that are uncomfortable for people to cross by foot due to high speeds of turning ve- hicles and faded or unmarked crosswalks. The crossing shown in Figure 3.28 requires people walking or biking to navigate multiple lanes of high-speed traffic entering the Highway 100 southbound ramp. As shown in Figure 3.27, the existing condition under the rail- road bridge is not pedestrian-friendly. Figure 3.31 shows a proposed cross-section of Eden Avenue that includes space for people walking, bicycling, and driving. People on bikes riding Figure 3.28 Existing pedestrian crossing at Eden Avenue and the southbound Highway 100 entrance ramp. Figure 3.29 Proposed plan of Eden Avenue; 1” = 200’. EDEN A V E HWY 100ARCADIA AVEHWY 100SB ENTRY RAMPHWY 100 NB EXIT RAMP / NEW FRONTAGE RDWILSON RDGRANGE RDNEW FRONTAGE RDG Figure 3.27 There is a complete lack of pedestrian facilities on the north side of Eden Avenue, looking east toward railroad bridge. Former Public Works Redevelopment Site City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 45 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.30 Section G -- Existing: Eden Avenue cross-section under the railroad bridge. Figure 3.31 Section G -- Proposed: Roadway design on Eden Avenue, shown at the most constricted location under the railroad bridge. Figure 3.32 Section H: Proposed Eden Avenue bridge over Highway 100, with added space for bicyclists and pedestrians. 46 Focus Areas 3 Figure 3.33 Example of a multi-use path. Photo credit: http://www. aviewfromthecyclepath.com/ Figure 3.34 Example of a multi-use path. Photo credit: https://commons. wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Queens_Quay,_Toronto,_bikeway.jpg in either direction would have low-stress, dedicated on-street space, separated from moving vehicle traffic by a physical barrier. The goal here is to provide a facility that would feel comfortable for people of all ages and abilities. Bike facilities on Eden serve a different purpose from Vernon, which is more oriented towards the commuter biker. The center lane of traffic—currently used for turning movements—is eliminated based on low traffic vol- umes and turning movements. An alternative design for Eden includes a shared-use path on the south side of the street. Sidewalk development on the north side of Eden is recommended as properties, such as the School District’s bus site and the former Public Works site, are rede- veloped. There has also been discussion about a roundabout at Arcadia and Eden but during this process a controlled intersec- tion was favored in order to better meet the needs of all modes of transportation. Further east from the intersection of Eden and the Highway 100 entrance ramp, right-of-way is restricted on the bridge passing over the highway. The bridge deck has limited space for mo- torists and bicycles to share and no horizontal buffer between pedestrians and moving traffic. A shared-use path is proposed as a retrofit to the existing bridge, which would create dedicat- ed space for non-motorized modes (Figure 3.32 to Figure 3.34). When the bridge is eventually entirely reconstructed, bike and pedestrian facilities should be fully integrated into its structure. It is also anticipated that by that time, the pedestrian bridge over Highway 100 between Vernon and Eden would be com- plete, thus creating an interconnected network serving different and mutually-supportive transportation goals. The intersection of Eden Avenue and Highway 100 will be reconstructed over time as highway access is reconfigured throughout the entire study area. As shown in Figure 3.29, re- designed access to and from Highway 100 is proposed to in- crease safety and legibility for all users; this is discussed further in Section 8 (Highway Access). Like all the projects in this study, the reconstruction of Eden requires further design, engineering, and public process before implementation. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 47 Focus Areas3 7 – Grandview Neighborhood Figure 3.35 Plan of 53rd Street, Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, showing access to the residential neighborhood to the south; 1” = 200’. Library EDEN A V E VERNON AVEGRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD53R D S T In this focus area, the realignment of Eden Avenue and the ad- dition of a controlled intersection at 53rd Street provide an opportunity to space intersections more logically along Vernon Avenue. It also creates an opportunity for a more appealing and safe bus stop location on Vernon with a strong pedestrian and visual connection to the Library/Senior Center building. A new controlled intersection at 53rd Street would allow safer and easier access to the single-family residential neighborhood to the south via Sherwood Road, by car, by bike, and on foot. This intersection also allows residents from the west of Vernon Avenue to access the library more easily and safely by any mode. Neighbors can also drive through the Grandview Square area to access Eden Avenue. With Eden Avenue shifted slightly to the north, the properties on either side can function much better, with more logical par- cel size, access, and parking configurations. It is important, how- ever, that those parking areas do not simply become another sea of asphalt parking along Vernon Avenue. For instance, the new library parking area nearer to Vernon could be a convert- ible plaza area that can be opened for parking only as needed (Figure 3.36 and Figure 3.37). In addition, a strong new pedes- trian connection from Vernon to the library’s front door gives Residential Neighborhood GRANDVIEW SQFigure 3.36 Example of a parking lot that can be utilized as flex-space for daily activities and seasonal special events. Photo credit: Close Landscape Architecture photo archive. Figure 3.37 Example of a parking lot that can support multi-layered infrastructure and public green space including stormwater filtration, district heating/cooling, and urban food production. Photo credit: Close Landscape Architecture photo archive. this civic building an “address” on Vernon, as noted in the earlier work of the Framework planning process. Parking in this area can be time-limited as well, to prioritize its use for library and senior center visitors rather than commuters. This might be considered as new municipal ramps or shared parking solutions are implemented around the District. Like other projects in this study, this plan will require the cooperation of multiple land- owners and entities, especially the gas station owners, City, and County. 48 Focus Areas 3 8 – Highway Access Highway 100 plays a significant role in the Grandview District providing access to and from regional routes by intersecting with 50th Street and Eden Avenue in a combined diamond/ cloverleaf intersection configuration. In order for the devel- opment of the District to be fully implemented, access to and from Highway 100 remains an important element of the trans- portation system, but it is also acknowledged that the existing interchange severely limits pedestrian and bicycle connections on either side of the Highway (Figure 3.38). The proposed reconfiguration of the Highway 100 interchange at both 50th Street and Eden Avenue would facilitate enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access while increasing safety as well as enabling developable parcels adjacent to the highway. Figure 3.39 shows the proposed west side configuration at both 50th Street and Eden Avenue. At 50th Street the signalized in- tersection with Highway 100 remains with the addition of a southbound right turn lane which replaces the free-right turn ramp that forces pedestrians and bicyclists to cross wide ramps with fast-moving vehicles. The eastbound free right turn lane to the southbound frontage is also removed to be replaced by a shared through/right-turn lane. The removal of these “free” right turn movements enables a continuous sidewalk with cross- walks to be implemented on both the north and south sides of 50th Street. A new intersection at Eden Avenue is created with the frontage road meeting Eden Avenue at grade at a signalized intersection. The existing southbound ramp from Eden Avenue which currently merges with the frontage road ramp is replaced by a single ramp to remove the merging area that is an exist- ing safety concern. The new west side frontage road provides opportunities for not only vehicular access to the Grandview District and Highway 100 but also for an enhanced multi-modal experience with sidewalks and bicycle facilities. On the east side of Highway 100 (Figure 3.39), the cloverleaf ramps are removed to enable development parcels to be creat- ed adjacent to the Highway with access provided by a frontage road mimicking the configuration on the west side. Access to northbound Highway 100 from 50th Street is provided from both eastbound and westbound 50th Street at a signalized in- tersection which enables the intersection footprint to be nar- rowed from the existing ramps with associated safety improve- ments for pedestrians and bicyclists. Access from northbound Highway 100 is enabled by a reconfigured ramp at Eden Ave- nue leading to the frontage road which also provides access to Grange Avenue and City Hall. These changes were analyzed for their traffic impacts on local streets, as described in Chapter 4. The changes on the east side of Highway 100 would require the relocation of the historic structures in Frank Tupa Park. Those structures are not at their historic location and a sep- arate process was already underway to determine if a more historically suitable and publicly accessible location is available. Reconstructing the ramps does not necessitate the elimination of the park itself, which could be reconfigured to complement the pedestrian bridge over Highway 100 and connectivity to the campus of City Hall. Figure 3.38 Existing redundant ramps and under-utilized space on east side of Highway 100. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 49 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.39 Plan of the new ramp configuration on the west and east sides of Highway 100, showing the integration of the ramp system with the District road network, servicing new developable parcels; 1” = 200’.GRANGE AVENew Development VERNO N A V E / 5 0 T H S T R E E T HIGHWAY 100NEW FRONTAGE ROADNew Development New Development EDEN A V ENEW FRONTAGE ROADARCADIA AVENew Development New Development New DevelopmentNew Development New Development New Development Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50 Focus Areas 3 9 – Highway 100 Ped/Bike Bridge Figure 3.40 Plan of a pedestrian/bike bridge over Highway 100, between Vernon and Eden Avenues; 1” = 200’. Pedestrian and Bike Bridge EDEN A V E VERNON AVE 50T H S T With the goal of celebrating more non-motorized transporta- tion users in the Grandview area, convenient connections for people walking and biking across Highway 100 are important for the District and the City of Edina as a whole. Currently, travel in the Grandview District by bike or foot re- quires the use of Vernon Avenue/50th Street or Eden Avenue. While there are plans to make walking and biking more com- fortable on these corridors, both would require substantial in- vestments to either retrofit or replace the current bridges over Highway 100. A bridge in the center of the study area for the exclusive use of non-motorized traffic would connect Edina City Hall with the central commercial area around Jerry’s Foods. As development continues on the land between Jerry’s and City Hall, this bicycle and pedestrian connection will further enhance the walking and biking network in the District. It is likely that this is in lieu of a complete “Grandview Green” as envisioned in the Far Term scenario in Chapter 2. Figure 3.40 shows the proposed location for the non-motorized bridge over Highway 100 connecting the east and west sides of the study area. The span would provide a direct connection for those traveling on foot or by bike within the District. Figure 3.41 Panoramic view of the proposed pedestrian and bike bridge area, looking east. Vernon Avenue is on the left, and Eden Avenue is on the right. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 51 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.42 Example of a pedestrian/bike bridge. Photo credit: https:// www.pittsburghglasscenter.org/pages/eastside-pedestrian-bridge Figure 3.43 Example of a pedestrian/bike bridge. Photo credit: http:// progressiveengineer.blogspot.com/2012/08/a-visit-to-worlds-longest- pedestrian.html Figure 3.41 shows the existing space the bridge would occupy, looking east over Highway 100. The bridge itself would serve as a place for people within the District—more than simply an accommodation for crossing the highway. The bridge would provide a connection between the east and west portions of the Grandview area, but it would also serve as a community asset: a platform for resting, socializing, or enjoying the view. A combination of human-scaled design fea- tures, which may include lighting and public art, is recommended for this bridge. It is important to note that the width of the bridge is intended to be the same width—at a minimum—as the curb-to-curb width of the adjoining street (Figure 3.42 to Figure 3.45). Figure 3.44 Example of a pedestrian/bike bridge. Photo credit: http:// www.gcpvd.org/2015/06/22/news-on-the-providence-river-pedestrian- bridge/ Figure 3.45 Example of a pedestrian/bike bridge. Photo credit: http:// melsnaps.blogspot.com/2012/11/yarra-bridges.html 52 Focus Areas 3 10 – Transit Center Existing Location with Improvements The Grandview District is currently served by a number of local and express bus routes. These routes provide access to and from neighborhoods in Edina, as well as commute, school, and leisure destinations in St. Louis Park and Minneapolis. Most bus- es circulate through the District and layover at the existing stop on Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue, however riders have noted that there are few amenities at this location. In addition, the discontinuous sidewalks, unmarked crosswalks, and uninviting walk environment make it difficult for pedestrians to access the stops on Vernon (Figure 3.46). Complete streets treatments along Vernon Ave will begin to address some of these issues, by shortening crossing distances and adding more opportunities to cross Vernon. In addition, this Plan recommends transit amenities at the stop, including a heated shelter, real-time information when available, and other transit improvements (Figure 3.47). Most of these improve- ments are included in the Short Term Changes scenario. Proposed Location(s) adjacent to Rail Line Currently, there is no passenger rail serving the Grandview Dis- trict. However, there is community interest in high capacity north-south transit, which could perhaps be installed within the existing freight rail line. Implementing passenger rail service would require upgrades within the corridor, requiring time for planning, funding, and construction of improvements to the line. More recently, it has also been suggested that Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) might be installed along Highway 100, much like BRT and Express services in Minneapolis along Interstate 35W. In either case, the Framework Plan contemplates access improvements that would welcome or even encourage the location of high capacity transit within the District. The Study Team evaluated locations for a transit center within the District, considering transit operations, access to the sta- tion, and proximity to the existing rail line. The Framework Plan contemplates a transit center on Eden Avenue, just opposite the existing freight rail line. Described below are options for a tran- sit hub, including supportive parking policy to support access to bus and rail services that would serve such a facility. Figure 3.46 Existing transit facilities on Vernon Avenue by the Super America north of Link Road. Figure 3.47 Diagram of proposed improvements to the transit system in the Short Term; 1” = 200’.VERNON AVEEDEN AVE LI N K R D GRANDVIEW SQ53RD ST Improved Bus Turn-Around Improved Transit Stop Library City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 53 Focus Areas3 The preferred transit location (Option B) would be on the north side of Eden Avenue, within the former Public Works site (Figure 3.48). This location would enable direct connections for feeder services to high capacity transit as well as access for pe- destrians and cyclists making use of the new connections along Eden and incorporated into a new railway pedestrian crossing, linking the 505 public parking spaces west of the tracks with the transit hub and vice versa. Park and ride facilities could be shared or incorporated into a new garage facility contemplat- ed for the former Public Works site, or could utilize the newly created parking ramp directly behind Jerry’s grocery store (east side), as described in Section 3 of this chapter. The pedestrian crossing over the railroad tracks could eventually become a rail platform for future rail transit. This location would also benefit bus operations, providing ready access to a pull-in or layover location on Eden and allowing vehicles to continue traveling routes to and from Highway 100 and Edina neighborhoods. Option A, at the northern edge of the former Public Works site, would also offer connections to park and ride facilities, as well as pedestrians and cyclists within the District. Given the topography of the area, a direct, at grade connection could be negotiated for pedestrian access across the rail line. While this location is central to the District, it would require both drivers and, more importantly, transit vehicles to travel along Arcadia Avenue and potentially Gus Young Lane to access the transit center. This may impact the character of these streets, as well as transit operations and travel times. Establishing a more robust transit center within the District is included in the Long Term Changes scenario, since it would like- ly coincide with implementation of a high-capacity transit line. Figure 3.48 Plan of a pedestrian/bike bridge over Highway 100, between Vernon and Eden Avenues; 1” = 200’. B EDEN A V E ARCADIA AVENew Development GUS YOUNG LN Jerry’s Parking Ramp New Parking Ramp Ped Crossing A Option B provides the most flexibility for coordination with land use developments, access to high capacity transit routes in the form of both rail and bus, and ongoing transit operations. However, as development of the former Public Works site pro- gresses, as well as analysis of long term high capacity transit op- tions, it may become necessary to contemplate other locations. Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 54 Focus Areas 3 11 – Our Lady of Grace Figure 3.49 Existing northern entrance/exit to OLG off of Eden Avenue, showing a completely uncontrolled intersection condition and oversized vehicular facilities for average traffic needs. Former Public Works Redevelopment Site EDEN A V E OLG During the process of this study, representatives from OLG described their current and planned operations and those as- sumptions were factored into the overall approach and analysis for the District. We do not anticipate significant changes to the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) property during the short term. Currently, the Edina School District does utilize the OLG park- ing lot for staging buses in the mornings and it is likely that will change as the School District relocates its facility to the Cahill Industrial Park area of Edina. This will result in less bus traffic on and around the OLG property, alleviating some morning con- gestion on Eden Avenue. The biggest change for OLG will come in the mid-term with the redesign of Eden Avenue. It is anticipated that the entrance drive from OLG to Eden Avenue (Figure 3.49) will be reconfig- ured as a “right-in, right-out” intersection to alleviate site line problems from the railroad crossing to the west and to encour- age the use of the controlled intersections at Arcadia Avenue and the new north-south road west of Highway 100 (Figure 3.50). For purposes of the traffic analysis, this study did contem- plate the possibility of the redevelopment of a small portion of the campus, as described in Chapter 4, although this is not in OLG’s current plans. Figure 3.50 Plan of a right-in, right-out condition at the north entrance of OLG, to control traffic during peak hours; 1” = 200’. RAILROADARCADIA AVEBROOKSIDE AVE City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 55 Focus Areas3 12 – Beyond Study Area Grandview does not exist in isolation, of course. Its importance as a commercial and business node directly reflects the availabil- ity of both historic and current access from Highway 100 and Vernon Avenue/50th Street. Therefore, it is not surprising that there are several possible improvements that were noted that are outside the boundaries of this project. In particular, two nearby areas were noted by residents or staff as being critically important to the function of Grandview (Figure 3.51). First, the next exit off Highway 100 to the south of Grandview, Benton Avenue, currently operates as a difficult on-off pair of four-way stop signs on either side of the highway. Upgrading this area to controlled (signalized) intersections would increase their capacity and perception of safety for both vehicular and non-motorized traffic. This would help relieve pressure on the exit at Grandview and improve traffic flow on Highway 100. Second, the intersection of Brookside Road and Interlachen Boulevard north of Vernon Avenue currently experiences con- gestion as it acts as a link to the neighborhoods to the north. In part, this could be resolved through the proposed improve- ments to the intersection of Interlachen and Vernon, but in the Long Term, this intersection is likely to require additional study and reconfiguration. There are likely to be other improvements needed outside of the district that will support the goals within it. As Highway 100 evolves, transit access increases, or changes happen in the surrounding areas, Grandview will also see change and improve- ment. Figure 3.51 Benton Avenue and Highway 100 intersection and Brookside Avenue locations, relative to Transportation Study area and ; 1” = 1200’. EDEN A VEVERNON AVE50T H S T HIGHWAY 100BENTON AVE BROOKSIDE AVEINTERLACHEN BLVD Controlled Intersection Upgrade GRANDVIEW DISTRICT STUDY AREA CHAPTER Assumptions Existing Conditions Short Term Changes Mid Term Changes Long Term Changes Transportation Analysis 4 Figure 4.1 Midday weekday traffic on Highway 100. Photo Credit: Colin Harris, Alta Planning and Design. 58 Traffic Modeling 4 Assumptions Transportation Analysis Context Based on the transportation principles and priorities identified through the study process, three scenarios for changes to the transportation network through and around the Grandview District were evaluated. This was intended to be a conservative analysis and therefore even though substantial improvements are suggested for the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit systems, it was assumed that this did not reduce auto travel. Traffic Evaluation Assumptions The following outlines the assumptions included for evaluating changes to transportation operations within the Grandview District based on current and variations for future conditions. Traffic Data • All traffic data counts included: vehicles, heavy vehicles, pe- destrians, and bicycles • New traffic data counts were not undertaken for this evalu- ation. The Study Team utilized existing counts and available data from the City of Edina and MnDOT, because nothing has significantly changed in this area since the last set of data was collected in 2013. Synchro Modeling The following settings and assumptions were used for traffic evaluation using Synchro Version 9: • For future analysis, the peak hour factor was set in Synchro as per the existing intersection approaches for all future scenarios. • Synchro enables multiple signal timing optimizations; for existing conditions, signal timings were provided by the City. For future scenarios, signal timings were optimized as appropriate and will be field adjusted by the City upon build out. • For the area in and around the Grandview District, the “CBD area type” for “central business district” was not deemed appropriate under existing or future scenarios. • Pedestrian and bicycle volumes from the traffic counts were included as “conflicting pedestrians/bicycles” volumes in the model. • Traffic volumes entering the study area were based on ex- isting counts for future scenarios • The baseline Synchro model was provided by the City. • Future scenarios used Synchro’s Traffic Impact Analysis module to generate routes in and out of proposed develop- ments and calculate for Trip Assignments and Distributions. Trip Generation • Each of the parcels (that had potential for change) was assigned a land-use composed primarily of either hous- ing (apartments) or office. For parcels that were assigned mixed uses it was assumed that any existing trips to those parcels would attribute for the associated retail element of the future use. • For retail and office uses a square footage (retail) or num- ber of employees (office) was associated for each parcel. A 50 employee/acre and 30 dwelling units/acre were deemed appropriate for the short-term scenario with retail uses based on a simple SF/acre calculation. • Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Man- ual (9th Edition) trips rates were calculated for each poten- tial parcel yield in the AM and PM peak hour. The Short- Term scenario (30DU/Acre) was the base scenario with the 60 & 120 DU/Acre scenarios being multiples of that. • Trips were assigned to the network based on the existing trip patterns within the Synchro model. • In the case of the former Public Works site assumptions were made for the mixed-use development of the site in- City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 59 Traffic Modeling4 corporating residential and community space. The com- munity uses of the site have yet to be confirmed so ge- neric community center trip rates were assumed based on approximately 60,000 gsf. The traffic study performed in August, 2015 by WSB & Associates, Inc included a detailed site-specific analysis based upon a final build-out in 2035, or approximately the Long Term scenario of this study. • Through the outreach and stakeholder discussions, of this study, Our Lady of Grace Catholic School was reviewed for it’s potential for change in the Short, Mid and Long-Term, despite it being located outside of the study boundaries. At this time it was decided that the potential for change was limited except for the two vacant parcels near Eden Avenue. These two parcels were projected to be housing in the short- and mid-term scenarios in order to fit with our highest foreseeable traffic demand approach. Data Collection: Vehicle, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Counts The transportation modeling included analysis of eight inter- sections, primarily those on the major roadway thoroughfares within the District as they have the greatest potential to be changed due to street and transit modifications. The intersec- tion of Eden/Wilson/Grange was not evaluated because existing data was not available, and performance is likely to be similar to nearby intersections, but further evaluation will be required as improvements are implemented. Existing data counts were utilized from prior City of Edina studies and current MnDOT projects. The following conditions were recorded during the AM and PM peak periods: • Vehicles volumes and turn movements; • Vehicle classification; • Pedestrian and bicycle volumes; and • Determination of the peak hour and average daily volumes. Evaluated Intersections A. 50th Street at southbound Highway 100 B. Vernon Avenue / 50th Street at Interlachen Boulevard C. Vernon Avenue at Jerry’s Site Access D. Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue E. Eden Avenue at Sherwood Road F. Eden Avenue at Arcadia Avenue / Normandale Avenue G. 50th Street at Grange Road Figure 4.2 Intersections included in the traffic modeling analysis. A B C D E F G H 60 Traffic Modeling 4 * LONG TERM ANALYSIS RESULTS NOT SHOWN BECAUSE THEY EXCEED THE DETAILED MODELING TIME HORIZON. Figure 4.3 Summary of traffic modeling analyses throughout the project timeframe for development for the Grandview District. Introduction to findings The analysis described in this chapter is intended to explore im- provements to every mode of transportation in the Grandview District. The table below describes the metrics used to make this analysis and to balance the experience of different users. However, we know that many people primarily recognize the performance of a transportation system from the point of view of how long they sit in their car at an intersection. In order to understand those experi- ences in a larger context, the table represents average vehicle delay across the network in terms of seconds. We can see that the proposed improvements, even at our “highest foreseeable den- sity” assumptions, dramatically improve the safety and access of all other modes, while resulting in relatively few additional seconds of delay for automobile traffic. Even without additional density, the proposed improvements act as a partial antidote to additional traffic that will occur regardless of whether redevel- opment occurs within the District, as a result of the consistent rise of background levels of traffic. This helps explain why our Existing Conditions Short Term (30 units/ac) Mid Term (60 units/ac) Long Term (120 units/ac) Vehicle Trips • AM • PM 4048 4197 +10% +17% +20% +34% +40% +68% Average Auto Delay • AM • PM 42 secs 86 secs 41 secs 114 secs 82 secs 107 secs Average Auto Speed • AM • PM 15 mph 11 mph 13 mph 8 mph 10 mph 9 mph Pedestrian Connectiv- ity* (% sidewalks continuous) v 25%66%100% Crossing Experience* (% crosswalks marked)19%38%91%100% Bicycle Connectivity (% routes continuous)0%0%66%100% Access to Transit Access to Parking City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 61 Traffic Modeling4 overall finding is that the transportation network as a whole is improving even though there is some additional delay for autos. In the more detailed analysis of each intersection in the various timeframes, the basis for the performance of the auto-related portions of the analysis is Level of Service (LOS). It is therefore important to understand that LOS is based on time spent at an intersection, not queuing time and it is aggregated for a time pe- riod. Further, the average vehicle delay for the district summary is the delay experienced through the entire network by each vehicle (i.e., all the intersections combined), but there is not really an industry standard for network delay. In reviewing this analysis and determining whether the trade- offs described above are acceptable, it is also important to re- iterate that improvements described in later timeframes could be implemented earlier, relative to redevelopment projects, and therefore improve the LOS sooner. However, this timing must be balanced against the costs and inconveniences related to ac- celerated construction activity. Figure 4.4 Currently, the transportation network does not serve all modes in a balanced way, such as at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard at Vernon Avenue 62 Traffic Modeling 4 Existing Conditions Utilizing the traffic count data, the existing signal timing data, and the modeling assumptions, a Synchro model was developed for existing conditions of the study area. The Synchro results for the existing conditions are shown in Figure 4.6. The key indicator used to analyze the road network is Level of Service (LOS). The analysis also enabled review of queue lengths and volume to capacity ratios. Under existing conditions, drivers around Grandview currently experience minimal delays with some exceptions at the intersection of Vernon Avenue / Inter- lachen Boulevard in both the AM and PM peak periods (Figure 4.7). Under existing conditions, other key indicators include the av- erage vehicle speed and average vehicle delay throughout the network, as well as a multi-modal analysis, such as crosswalk experience and bicycle connectivity (Figure 4.5). Figure 4.5 Existing Conditions Average Vehicle Speeds, Delays, and Multi- modal Analysis District Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Vehicle Speed 15 mph 11 mph Average Vehicle Delay 42 secs 86 secs Crossing Experience (% of crosswalks marked)19% Pedestrian Connectivity (% sidewalks continuous)25% Bicycle Connectivity (% routes continuous)0% 1” = 100’ City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGEARCADIAGRANDVIEW SQUARE SHERWOOD53RD ST 52ND ST IN T E R LACH EN Jerry’s 50TH ST Former Public Work Redevelopment Site Enhanced Bus Connection City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 63 Traffic Modeling4 Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term50th@ SB 100Vernon/50th@ InterlachenVernon @ Jerry’sVernon @ EdenEden @ SherwoodEden @ Arcadia/Normandale50th@ GrangeGrange @ NB 100Vernon @ 53rd/GrandviewFrontage Rd @ SB 10050th@ NB 100ABCDEFampmKeyExisting Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Figure 4.7 Diagram of wait-times for traffic flow through district for the current Existing Condition of the transportation network. Level of Service delays are shown for signalized intersections. A “D” Level of Service is typically considered acceptable in an urban condition like the Grandview District. LEVEL OF SERVICE (delay in seconds) 0-10 10-20 20-35 35-55 55-80 80+ Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Intersection Intersection LOS (AM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; AM) Intersection LOS (PM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; PM) 50th Street at southbound Highway 100 off-ramp B 17 B 19 Vernon Avenue / 50th Street at Interlachen Boulevard C 28.5 D 53.7 Vernon Avenue at Jerry’s Site Access A 1.3 C 22 Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue B 13 B 12.4 Eden Avenue at Sherwood Road A 2.9 A 2.7 Eden Avenue at Arcadia Ave- nue / Normandale Avenue B 12.3 C 24.4 50th Street at Grange Road B 13 C 22.9 Grange Road at northbound Highway 100 off-ramp A 8.7 A 8.9 Figure 4.6 Existing Conditions Level of Service and Delay 64 Traffic Modeling 4 Short Term Changes To assess future conditions within the Grandview study area under the Short-Term scenario, the Synchro model was mod- ified to reflect the proposed changes with the District (Figure 4.10). Under the short-term scenario, it was assumed that there would be growth within the District on parcels deemed to have potential to change as outlined in Chapter 4, Section 1, Assumptions, at a rate of 30 dwelling units per acre as the highest foreseeable density. These development parcels would lead to a growth of 416 AM peak hour vehicle trips and 723 PM peak hour vehicle trips, a 10% and 17% in overall vehicle growth respectively (Figure 4.8). Traffic volumes were assigned to the network utilizing the Syn- chro Traffic Impact Analysis module enabling trips to be distrib- uted using future patterns based on changes in roadway con- nections and volumes (Figure 4.9). Under the short-term scenario, drivers around Grandview would experience additional delays related to the increase in development and associated vehicle trips. Within this time frame, many of the proposed transportation changes would include traffic signal and access modifications including an in- crease in multimodal connectivity leading to better crosswalk experiences. Figure 4.8 Existing Conditions Average Vehicle Speeds, Delays, and Multi- modal Analysis District Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Vehicle Speed 13 mph 8 mph Average Vehicle Delay 41 secs 114 secs Crossing Experience (% of crosswalks marked)38% Pedestrian Connectivity (% sidewalks continuous)25% Bicycle Connectivity (% routes continuous)0% 50th 1” = 100’ City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGEARCADIAGRANDVIEW SQUARE SHERWOOD53RD ST 52ND ST IN T E R LACH EN Jerry’s 50TH ST Former Public Work Redevelopment Site Enhanced Bus Connection City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 65 Traffic Modeling4 Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Figure 4.9 Diagram of wait-time impacts to traffic flow through district intersections in the Short Term Changes scheme. Level of Service delays are shown for signalized intersections. A “D” Level of Service is typically considered acceptable in an urban condition like the Grandview District. LEVEL OF SERVICE (delay in seconds) 0-10 10-20 20-35 35-55 55-80 80+ Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Intersection Intersection LOS (AM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; AM) Intersection LOS (PM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; PM) 50th Street at southbound Highway 100 off-ramp B 16.8 C 22.5 Vernon Avenue / 50th Street at Interlachen Boulevard C 30.4 F 80.8 Vernon Avenue at Jerry’s Site Access A 4.2 B 12.5 Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue B 17.1 B 19.4 Eden Avenue at Sherwood Road A 3.1 A 3.6 Eden Avenue at Arcadia Ave- nue / Normandale Avenue C 18.2 E 44 50th Street at Grange Road B 11.9 D 40.2 Grange Road at northbound Highway 100 off-ramp A 8.6 A 8.9 Figure 4.10 Short Term Conditions Level of Service and Delay 66 Traffic Modeling 4 Figure 4.11 Existing Conditions Average Vehicle Speeds, Delays, and Multi- modal Analysis District Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Vehicle Speed 11 mph 9 mph Average Vehicle Delay 82 secs 107 secs Crossing Experience (% of crosswalks marked)91% Pedestrian Connectivity (% sidewalks continuous)66% Bicycle Connectivity (% routes continuous)66% Mid Term Changes As per the Short-Term scenario, to assess future conditions within the Grandview study area under the Mid-Term scenario, the Synchro model was modified to reflect the proposed chang- es with the District (Figure 4.13). Under the mid-term scenario, it was assumed that there would be growth within the District on parcels deemed to have potential to change as outlined in Chapter 4, Section 1, Assumptions, at a rate of 60 dwelling units per acre as the highest foreseeable density. These development parcels would lead to a growth of 832 AM peak hour vehicle trips and 1446 PM peak hour vehicle trips, a 20% and 34% in overall vehicle growth respectively. Traffic volumes were assigned to the network utilizing the Syn- chro Traffic Impact Analysis module enabling trips to be distrib- uted using future patterns based on changes in roadway con- nections and volumes. The mid-term scenario incorporates major roadway and net- work connectivity enhancements. As shown in Figure 4.11, the AM peak hour would experience slightly more vehicle delay than in the short-term scenario, but the PM peak hour would be able to offset the trip increases due to the changes in the network, resulting in a slight decrease in overall delay. With the mid-term scenario spanning the 5-15 year time frame, significant improvements to the multi-modal network would enable the percentage of crosswalks marked to approach 100% and over two-thirds of the sidewalks and bicycle routes would be connected within the District (Figure 4.12). 1” = 100’ City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGEARCADIAGRANDVIEW SQUARE SHERWOOD53RD ST 52ND ST IN T E R LACH EN Jerry’s 50TH ST Former Public Work Redevelopment Site Enhanced Bus Connection City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 67 Traffic Modeling4 Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm KeyExisting Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th@ SB 100 Vernon/50th@ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th@ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th@ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Figure 4.12 Diagram of wait-time impacts to traffic flow through district intersections in the Mid Term Changes scheme. Level of Service delays are shown for signalized intersections. A “D” Level of Service is typically considered acceptable in an urban condition like the Grandview District. LEVEL OF SERVICE (delay in seconds) 0-10 10-20 20-35 35-55 55-80 80+ Existing Short-Term Mid-Term 50th @ SB 100 Vernon/50th @ Interlachen Vernon @ Jerry’s Vernon @ Eden Eden @ Sherwood Eden @ Arcadia/Normandale 50th @ Grange Grange @ NB 100 Vernon @ 53 rd/Grandview Frontage Rd @ SB 100 50th @ NB 100 A B C D E F am pm Key Intersection Intersection LOS (AM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; AM) Intersection LOS (PM) Average Signal Delay (Seconds; PM) 50th Street at southbound Highway 100 off-ramp D 39.4 C 22.4 Vernon Avenue / 50th Street at Interlachen Boulevard D 53.8 E 77.2 Vernon Avenue at Jerry’s Site Access A 6.7 B 11.4 Vernon Avenue at Eden Avenue C 21.1 C 27.7 Eden Avenue at Sherwood Road A 2.9 A 4.9 Eden Avenue at Arcadia Ave- nue / Normandale Avenue B 11.8 C 28.3 50th Street at Grange Road B 11.6 C 28.9 Vernon Avenue at 53rd Street / Grandview Avenue A 5.3 B 10.1 Frontage Road (West) at southbound Hwy 100 ramp C 27.3 D 47.4 Grange Road at northbound Highway 100 off-ramp A 6.6 B 15.5 Figure 4.13 Mid Term Conditions Level of Service and Delay 68 Traffic Modeling 4 Long and Far Term Changes The Long Term scenario and solutions are planned for the 15- 30 year timeframe, which is based upon recommendations that would dramatically change the district both in terms of its over- all transportation system and land-use development patterns. In this regard, the evaluation of the transportation system is beyond the horizon of the current modeling effort. As such, the Synchro model was not developed for the long-term scenario and will be further evaluated as the District grows in the coming years to account for increased pedestrian and bicycles trips, en- hanced transit services and a decrease in dependency on single occupancy vehicle trips. The transportation system would, however, include a fully com- pleted multi-modal network enabling connections throughout the District, to premium transit and the multi-modal bridge across Highway 100 (Figure 4.3). It is important to note that the highest foreseeable densities in the Long Term do require substantial investment in multiple modes of transportation in order to avoid high level of delay and safety impacts. As stated in Chapter 2, the results of this study suggest that at its highest densities, as shown in the Far Term Plan, a high-capacity transit service would likely be re- quired. Further, for all the timeframes and densities shown, it is clear that prioritizing a sustainable transportation network that supports multiple modes will require trade-offs and investment. The community, land owners, and the City will have to work closely together to achieve those objectives. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 69 Traffic Modeling4 Figure 4.14 Traffic crossing the existing freight railroad tracks. EdinaMN.gov Sketch Plan Review 5100 Eden Avenue Site Site Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 3.Patterns foraNeighborhoodCenter 27 4/05/12 PublicRealm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale Dr 52nd St 51st St PublicRealm/OpenSpaceDiagram A. GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C. GrandViewCrossing D. ArcadiaStreetscape E.GusYoungStreetscape F.ArcadeConnection G.Vernon Streetscape H. Eden Streetscape Issues/Considerations As with all sketch plan reviews; the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus for the discussion should be on the following: Proposed land use Proposed height Proposed setbacks PUD criteria Grandview Development Framework and Guiding Principles. Issues/Considerations Density. The residential density proposed is on the highest end of the density range within the Comprehensive Plan. The density is 100 units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan would allow 20 to 100 units at this site. Grandview Development Framework. The existing site is small at 1.38 acres. As demonstrated in the Grandview Development Framework, this site was anticipated for low rise row type housing with taller buildings closer to the highway. (See pages 4-7 in the attached “Site Location, Zoning, Comp. Plan and Framework.) The proposed plan does not follow that framework and proposes one building on the site. The massing of the building however is more toward Highway 100, away from Arcadia. Building Setbacks. Flexibility would be needed through a PUD from the required setbacks. (See the proposed setbacks in the attached site plans.) The setbacks proposed along Eden Avenue appear extreme at 4-15 feet. However, the right-of-way in that area is large; setbacks to the curb range from 33-45 feet. Setbacks on Arcadia are not as tight, ranging from 5-40 feet. The 5-foot area is a small portion of the building. Proposed height. The proposed height of 7 stories exceeds the code required 4-story maximum. As a comparison, the height of the Maison Green development is 7 stories and 76 feet and the Loden is 6 stories and 80 feet tall. City Standard (PID) Comp. Plan Proposed Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – North Rear – East 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 48 feet or building height (75 feet) 4-15 feet lot line & 33-45 feet curb* 5-40 feet lot line & 25-48 feet curb* 4 feet* 4 feet* Density 20-100 units/acre 100 units per acre Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories* Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30% .50% 69%* 3.0%* Parking Stalls – Residential 1.25 units per unit = 172 spaces 175 spaces Eden 100 Multi-Family March 24th 2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Sketch Plan Submittal Sketch Plan Submittal Contents Project Overview • Project Narrative • Site Overview • Development Data • Project Summary • Project Metrics • Project Team • Grandview District Framework Review • Current Zoning • Site Views • Site Images • Adjacent Spaces • Regional Amenities • Illustrative Site Plan • Amenity Plan • Floor Plans • Grading Plan • Utility Plan • Contextual Images • Perspective Images • Materials and Massing Images • Interior Amenity Spaces • Exterior Amenity Spaces Project Context Proposed Project Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Contents Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Overview Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Project Overview and Design Narrative Project Introduction Opus is pleased to share our sketch plan submittal with the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council. The package includes visioning and conceptual design for the exciting new redevelopment opportunity at 5100 Eden Avenue. The proposed project will play a major role in the City’s future goals for the Grandview neighborhood. Opus is proposing a 138-unit multifamily project that activates the boulevard along Arcadia Avenue and maximizes the site’s full potential. In addition to providing luxury homes for future residents, the project will feature a class A amenity package with indoor parking, a bike valet, fitness, a work from home area and an expansive outdoor amenity space complete with a spa. Along with the building amenities for residents to enjoy, the public will benefit from the improved connection along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The building frontage along Arcadia Avenue will feature an improved drive lane, new parallel parking stalls, a grassy boulevard, and a new and improved sidewalk for patrons. The newly constructed sidewalk will connect the neighborhood to nearby amenities in what is now an underutilized pedestrian area. Our team thoughtfully designed the building’s presence along this prominent avenue to synergize with the Grandview Project at 5146 Eden Avenue. The pedestrian experience along Eden Avenue will also be improved with lush, terraced landscaping between the sidewalk and the building. This site is an important puzzle piece to the overall goals for the Grandview District and we are excited to share our team’s vision. Site Overview 5100 Eden Avenue is made up of seven adjacent parcels totaling 1.38 acres on the northeast quadrant of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There is an existing 38,678 SF office building on the site that was built in 1968. The current tenants are on short term leases or include rights to remove with notice. Office space is not as desirable as it once was, and the existing building is not in alignment with the City’s vision for the site. The site is currently zoned Planned Office District-1 and will seek to be rezoned as a Planned Unit Development to allow the project to maximize its full potential. Development Data The proposed building will be seven stories in height, with the lowest level only partially exposed along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There are two levels of enclosed parking in a precast structure containing a total of 171 parking stalls, and five stories of wood frame construction above. There will be three access points, with one being off Eden Avenue and two off Arcadia Avenue. The main entrance will be off Arcadia Avenue and will have four visitor parking stalls alongside a generous green space lawn to create a welcoming environment for the project within the neighborhood. The total building will be approximately 244,000 gross square feet and will feature 138 dwelling units with 10% of the units affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The project will consist of a full amenity package, thoughtfully designed for the desires of future residents. An active lobby along Arcadia Avenue will have work from home spaces, a fitness space, and yoga room. There will also be a bike valet along with a dog wash and dog run. A second story amenity deck will have a spa, a turf area, and a grill area with seating. The sixth-floor amenity deck will provide additional space for resident enjoyment with dynamic views to City Hall and downtown Minneapolis. The site has approximately 16 feet of grade change from the Northwest corner to the Southwest corner, making this a challenging site. Opus has worked hard to mitigate these challenges and provide a vibrant project that responds to the district goals, the pedestrian experience, and the site forces, all the while maintaining a viable project. The exterior design will feature high class building materials such as high quality masonry, architectural wall cladding, architectural metal panels, generous glass, and plentiful balconies, all within a building form that respects and responds to the neighborhood. The building opens up toward Arcadia Avenue with an expansive front entry and exterior amenity package providing an enhanced pedestrian experience. The relief provided along this street responds well to the proposed development at the old Public Works site, and the two developments will provide a much-needed enhancement to Arcadia Avenue. The corners of the building anchor the structure to the site, but the design thoughtfully pulls back the mass in the middle. This is evident especially along Arcadia Avenue but also along Eden Avenue. The step-backs provide visual interest and relief for the public as they walk or drive by the site. Lush landscaping and terraced walls relieve some of the challenging topography, adding to the pedestrian experience. In addition, programming has been thoughtfully placed to activate the streetscape. Sustainability is a core tenant of Opus’s mission statement and will be incorporated into the design and execution of the project at every step. We intend to meet or exceed the requirements put forth by the city. Because of the small site size and healthy slope present, the development team is asking for relief on setbacks and height. Our goal is to work with the city on crafting a PUD that allows the project to move forward with the intent shown herein. Summary Opus is excited for the opportunity to be a part of the community’s overall vision for the Grandview neighborhood. In collaboration with our consultants and feedback from City staff, we believe the following package encapsulates the community’s desired outcome for the site. We look forward to working alongside the City of Edina and its stakeholders to drive this vision forward and build upon the city’s goals for this growing neighborhood. Project Overview and Narrative Applicant / Developer Architect Design Builder Opus Development Company 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus Design Build 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Civil Engineer Landscape Architect Sambatek 12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763-476-6010 Damon Farber 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612-332-7522 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Metrics Project Metrics Project Team Amenity/ Common Table 1 - Project Summary Lobby Area Notes: Level 6 A, R 31,042 31,042 891 25,164 650 3,728 2 4 11 17 Total Apartment GSF 181,201 Level 5 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Garage GSF 62,282 Level 4 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Project GSF 243,483 Level 3 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Level 2 A, R 31,987 31,987 1,245 23,821 2,566 3,728 3 16 8 1 28 Level 2 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 5,998 Level 1 A, L, P 41,550 20,876 20,673 1,082 5,615 8,687 4,884 1 2 3 52 8 Level 2 Private Patios 3,217 Level P1 P 42,946 41,406 1,540 528 982 111 Level 6 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 735 Total 243,483 62,282 181,201 6,419 134,820 11,903 24,506 12 72 37 17 138 163 8 Table 2 - Apartment Summary * Total GSF Includes Additional 2% Applied for Depth of Exterior Finish 9% 52% 27% 12% 100%Notes: ** Apt RSF Based on Exterior Face of Sheathing Goal Mix 10% 50% 40% 0% 100%Total Units 138 Typ. Floor Efficiency 84% (Rental SF / Gross SF) Total Stalls 171 P - Parking Parking Stall / Unit Ratio 1.24 R - Residential Levels Use Total GSF Garage GSF*Apt GSF* Shaft Apt RSF**Studio 1 BED 2 BED 2+ BED Units Parking L - Lobby Tandem Parking NOTE: Total parking excludes 4 visitor parking stalls. A - Amenity Proposed Mix Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Context Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Leverage publicly owned parcels Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. This project, while not leveraging publicly-owned parcels, will create a presence within the community and enhance the vibrancy and connectedness that is so desired in today’s urban cores. The project responds to the future bike/pedestrian path connecting to City Hall and the park to the west, as well as enhances the pedestrian experience through thoughtful landscaping and site terracing. Meet the needs of businesses and residents Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. The District currently houses many different types of businesses, goods and services. The proposed development at the corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue will build upon the economic vitality of the district by adding residents at the heart of this mix. This project will build upon a direct synergy between businesses and residents that is just now growing in the district. The project is designed to respond to a future proposed pedestrian/bike bridge connecting City Hall to the development to the west and Jerry’s ramp. The opportunity for multi-modal movement within the district will be enhanced with the proposed project and adjacencies, and will allow this project - and the district - to adapt and respond to the future. Turn barriers into opportunities Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The site currently has a healthy slope from the North side down to the Southwest corner, and is bordered by Hwy 100 on the east and an on-ramp spur to the north. We utilize the elements to our advantage with our proposed project by partially burying the lowest level within the site and exposing the level only when necessary for access. The highway provides unobstructed open space next to the site which will allow for expansive views from the residential units. Grandview District Review 6 on since ow well pation, rs, sions usiness ted be result hange, that will p, and Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. The proposed project will include an affordable housing aspect to meet the needs of residents within the district. An enhanced pedestrian experience is at the heart of the building siting, location and design addressing the ever growing multi-nodal transportation experience that is so relevant in today’s cities. A bike valet is also included on the north side of the project in anticipation of a connective corridor from city hall, across highway 100, to the new park on the west side of the Arcadia Avenue. All this meets the current and future goals of the Grandview District becoming an urban node where one can live, work, and play. Organize parking; provide convenience Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. Our parking is provided fully on site for both residents and guests. All residents will have indoor parking within the building, while spaces dedicated for future tenants are provided at the front entry. Along with resident, guest, and future tenant parking, we are proposing public, on-street parking along the west side of our site to serve the local shops and services. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The pedestrian experience along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue have been greatly enhanced through thoughtful building placement and massing. In addition, landscaping and land terracing is enhanced to provide relief and reprieve for those using public sidewalks. Additional parking is proposed to alleviate congestion, and the future bike/pedestrian trail is considered in our design. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The project will feature a Class A amenity package and experience for the residents who live there. Beautifully articulated design and high class materials will present the project as a destination within the district. Sustainability is one of Opus’s core values and will be infused in the project from the beginning. Finally, the pedestrian experience in the public realm will be greatly enhanced. Grandview District Guiding Principles Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review 374/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West Vernon A v e Eden A v e Hwy 100 Figure 3.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan showing Focus Areas throughout the Grandview District and beyond. CHAPTER IntroductionFocus Areas 3 City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST INTERLACHEN BLVD 50T H S T 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 11 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 (12) (12) 164/05/12 Land Use Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 15 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100ercial Residential 154/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Offi ce Medium/High Density Residential 274/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Public Realm A. GrandView Commons B. GrandView Steps C. GrandView Crossing D. Arcadia Streetscape E. Gus Young Streetscape F. Arcade Connection G. Vernon Streetscape H. Eden Streetscape A B C D F H H G E Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St 51st St Public Realm / Open Space Diagram 424/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Bicycle Improvements Transportation Primary bike routes Secondary bike routes Trail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of- way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 384/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Parking • Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/ practical. • Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district. • Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply. Parking beneath buildings New access to existing Surface lots Existing ramp Direction of traffi cVernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100P P Enhance the pedestrian experience Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontage Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontageOriginally thought of as Mixed Use Bike Routes are a key component to the neighborhood Parking should be hidden as best as possible Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Current Zoning ©LOGIS 2013, Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCR Current Zoning Class The site is currently zoned POD-1 Planned Office given its current use. The intent is to rezone the site to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and establish specific zoning language for the proposed project. Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 Districts R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 3/22/2023, 12:54:36 PM 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 g Unit ng Unit esidence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 sidence mmercial mmercial ice PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 | Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Existing Site Images From Corner From Sidewalk From Parking Lot From Parking Lot From Southeast Parking Lot Entrance From Sidewalk From Sidewalk From Northwest Lot Corner GrandviewYard 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 SHEET 38 RENDERING #1 RESTAURANT AERIAL FROM SOUTHWEST COVER SHEETGRANDVIEW YARDRESTAURANTSENIOR COOPERATIVEAERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST*NOTE: RENDERINGS ARE STYLIZED ILLUSTRATIONS. REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN ELEMENTS. RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Adjacent Spaces Our Lady of Grace Edina OffiCenter The Hilltop Restaurant Retail Center Proposed Restaurant Proposed Senior Coop 4917 Eden Avenue Multi-Family Edina City Hall Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Regional Amenities Local Amenities Medical Facilities Grocery and Convenience Stores Postal Services Educational Institutions Edina Cahill Historical School Our Lady of Grace Catholic School Highlands Elementary School Civic Facilities Edina City Hall Edina Police Department Edina Hennepin County Library Funeral Home Religious Institution Parks and Recreational Areas Edina Parks Recreation Edina Country Club Utley Park Wooddale Park Arden Park Arden Park Rink Todd Park Highlands Park Garden Park Browndale Park Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Proposed Project Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Illustrative Site Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Level 2 Amenity Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Lower Level Garage and Parking Floor Plan Legend Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 1 Garage and Parking 5’ 5’ 7’ 11’ Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 2 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 3-5 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 6 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grading Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Utility Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Contextual Views Northwest Perspective Southwest Perspective Northeast Perspective Southeast Perspective Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views West Perspective View South Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views East Perspective View North Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Building Materials and Massing Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Exterior Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Interior Amenities