Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-04-26 Planning Commission Regular Meeting MinutesDraft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 24, 2023 Page 1 of 4 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 26, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Felt, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager, Kris Aaker, Assistant Planner, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Olson, Hu, and Gandhi. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Chair Bennett indicated Item V.A. Commission Member Review, was asked to be continued to the May 24, 2023 Planning Commission agenda. Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the April 26, 2023; agenda as amended. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, March 29, 2023 and April 12, 2023 Commissioner Felt moved to approve the March 29, 2023 and April 12, 2023, meeting minutes. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Commission Member Review The item was continued to the May 24, 2023 Planning Commission meeting. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Public Hearings A. Ordinance No. 2023-06: EV-Solar Zoning Code Amendment Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 24, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Sustainability Manager Hancock presented Ordinance No. 2023-06, EV-Solar Zoning Code Amendment. Staff asks the Commission to review the proposed City zoning code amendment and make a recommendation to the City Council approving the Ordinance Amendment. Staff answered Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the Zoning Code Amendment. Motion Commissioner Miranda moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of Ordinance No. 2023-06: EV-Solar Zoning Code Amendment as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein with investigating the seventeen-foot height for carports and removing incentivized parking. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. The Commission discussed the merits of the motion. Motion tied 4 ayes (Felt, Miranda, Padilla, Daye), 4 nays (Smith, Strauss, Bornstein, Bennett). B. B-23-06 6805 Paiute Dr. Retaining Wall Setback Variance Request Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request of 6805 Paiute Dr. for a retaining wall setback variance . Staff recommends approval of the retaining wall setback variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Rich and Mrs. Rene Cox, applicants, introduced themselves and addressed the Commission. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the proposed variance. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 24, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Motion Commissioner Daye moved that the Planning Commission recommend of the Retaining Wall Setback Variance Request as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VIII. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 5100 Eden Avenue Director Teague presented the request of 5100 Eden Avenue for a Sketch Plan Review. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Nick Murnane, Opus Group and Mr. Theo Groethy, Opus Architects and Engineers addressed the Commission. The Commission asked questions of the applicant. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered the following comments:  Would like to see some amenities along the different areas of the building to help animate the street.  There could be more open space to the North and South without giving up density.  Need to provide bike racks for the amenities.  Would like to see a different height to the building.  Likes the density and feels this project is in the right place.  Fits in with the Grandview plan.  Does not fit with the Grandview plan  Concern about meeting the PUD criteria.  Would like to see more done around the corners of the building to stand out in the community.  Looking to see more revisions because it could be done a little better.  Needs to look at how this project fits in the puzzle with everything else along Grandview.  Need to look at the setbacks on the corners for reorientation.  This seems to be the most likely design for this site.  Concerned with the density and parking.  Needs to integrate this design better into the neighborhood with more connectivity.  Perfect place for density and where the City wants the density.  Would make sense to have a continuous wall along Arcadia and allow for mixed use.  Adding detail to the building would be nice.  Needs to get more creative on meeting the needs of businesses and residents, turning barriers into opportunities, pursuing logical increments, make vibrant walkable and attractive spaces, Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 24, 2023 Page 4 of 4 improve movement for all ages and modes, bicycles, pedestrians, electric bicycles, cars and buses and the unique sense of place incorporating natural and sustainable features.  Handsome facades are fine, but the building needs to interact better.  Could be more creative in the design.  Supports the use.  Having something on the corner like a coffee shop or diner would help stimulate other traffic and modes of transit throughout the day. IX. Chair and Member Comments None. X. Staff Comments Received. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Felt moved to adjourn the April 26, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:26 PM. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.