Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-06-14 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAg enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota City H all Council Chambers Wednesday, June 14, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. How to Participate in Public Hearings: Call 786-496-5601 E nter Confer ence Pin 6808653# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to g et in the queue to speak An operator will intr oduce you when it is your turn I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Draft Minutes of Regu la r Meetin gs on Ma y 24, 2023 V.Com m u n ity Com m ent During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Pu b lic Hea rings A.B-23-07 Variance request for 4236 Scott Terrace VII.Rep orts/Recom m en d ation s A.2024 Pla n n ing Com m ission W ork Pla n VIII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents IX.Sta1 Com m ents X.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli5cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: June 14, 2023 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes of R egular Meetings on May 24, 2023 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the draft minutes from May 24, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Minutes from Regular Meeting May 24, 2023 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023  Page 1 of 3       Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers May 24, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:07 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Olson, Felt, Hu and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Scott Neal, City Manager, Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioner Gandhi. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the May 24, 2023, agenda and to continue the public hearing for the Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Multiresidential Land Uses in the PCD, Planned Commercial District to June 28, 2023. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, April 26, 2023 The Commission discussed the points made for the sketch plan review and indicated to remove any reference to building orientation. Commissioner Felt moved to approve the April 26, 2023, meeting minutes as amended. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Commission Member Review City Manager Neal presented the Commission Member Review. Manager Neal answered Commissioner questions. VI. Community Comment Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023  Page 2 of 3     Ms. Janie Weston, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Commission on the tabled Zoning Ordinance Amendment, requesting the Commission to read through Zoning Code Section 36-612, concerning Conditional Uses. VII. Public Hearings A. Continue Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment Regarding Multiresidential Land Uses in the PCD, Planned Commercial District Public hearing was continued to June 28, 2023. B. 6200 Interlachen Blvd, Amendment to a Conditional Use Permit Director Teague presented the request of 6200 Interlachen Blvd for a Conditional Use Permit.  Staff recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Joel Livingood, Interlachen Country Club, 6200 Interlachen Boulevard, introduced himself and presented the proposed changes to the Commission. Mr. Livingood answered questions from the Commission. Public Hearing Ms. Janie Weston, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Commission regarding the Conditional Use Permit and not following Zoning Code 36-612. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission discussed the amendment to the Conditional Use permit and felt the changes were appropriate. Motion Commissioner Olson moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the amendment to a Conditional Use Permit as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Sketch Plan Review – 5780 Lincoln Drive Director Teague presented the request of 5780 Lincoln Drive for a sketch plan review.   Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023  Page 3 of 3     Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Mr. Curt Gunsbury, CEO of Solhem Companies, Mr. Petro Megits, Architect at Kaas Wilson Architects, Mr. Amol Dixit, Solhem and others were at the meeting and addressed the Commission. The Commission asked questions of the applicant. The Commission reviewed the sketch plan and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. IX. Chair and Member Comments Received. X. Staff Comments Received. XI. Adjournment Commissioner Padilla moved to adjourn the May 24, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:33 PM. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: June 14, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:B-23-07 Varianc e reques t for 4236 S cott Terrac e Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance request subject to the findings in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: A 4.12-foot front yard, a .7-foot side yard setback for new building walls and a 1.2-foot side yard setback variance for an overhang to an existing nonconforming foundation at 4236 S cott Terrace. T he request is a redesign of a 2nd story addition of the home approved in 2021 for setback variances. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Site Location Staff Report Engineering Memo Applicant Narrative Exis ting Home and Survey Proposed Plans and Survey 2021 Res olution, Minutes, and Approved Plans Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Staff Pres entation Property Owner's Dis played Pres entation Ed ina, Hennep in, MetroG IS, Edin a, Henn epin , MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates2013, © WSB & Associa tes 2013 4236 Scott Terrace May 11, 2021 1 in = 94 f t / The subject property, 4236 Scott Terrace is located west of Scott Terrace, south of 42nd Street and north of Morningside Road. The existing home, built in 1963, is a one-story rambler with a tuck- under two car garage. The rambler has a non-conforming south side yard and front yard setback. The applicant has submitted a request for a 4.12-foot front yard variance, a .7-foot side yard setback variance for new building walls and a 1.2- foot side yard setback variance for an overhang for a new home to be constructed on the existing nonconforming foundation that primarily aligns with the current non-conforming setbacks of the south and east sides of the existing first floor. A variance is needed given that the alternate setback standard cannot be used if the existing first floor is torn down with a new 1st and 2nd floor constructed on the existing nonconforming foundation. It should be noted that similar variances were granted on the property in 2021 to add a 2nd floor onto the existing nonconforming 1st floor for a flat roofed, 2 story home, (see attached plans, resolution of approval and minutes of the meeting). Since variance approval, the homeowners have determined the flat roof design is impractical and the structural integrity of the 1st floor will not support a 2nd floor requiring the removal of more than 50% of the exterior wall area which classifies the structure as a new home. New home construction must adhere to current zoning ordinance requirements and a construction management plan. Variances from setback are needed to build on the existing nonconforming foundation. The building envelope is similar to the 2021 variance approved design with the exception of a pitched roof with overhang instead of a flat roof. All conditions for the 2021 approval remain in place. The current request is a design modification to the approved plan due to construction challenges. There are 3 variances requested to rebuild on the existing foundation. A front yard setback variance is needed given the existing home is forward of the average requirement. The average front yard setback is established at 42.56 ft for the property. The existing structure is non- conforming and measures 39.1ft. The proposed second floor will match the existing side and front setbacks with a small non-livable architectural projection that measures 8 additional inches. The June 14, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner B-23-07 A 4.12-foot front yard variance, .7-foot side yard setback variance for new building walls and a 1.2- foot side yard setback variance for an overhang for a new home on an existing nonconforming foundation at 4236 Scott Terrace. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 applicant has indicated the 8” projections have been added to create visual interest to the front and side elevation where the exterior finish changes and is critical to the architectural design. With exception of the side and front yard setback, the proposed project meets all other zoning requirements. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned R-1 and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features 4236 Scott Terrace is a one-story rambler built in 1963. The current home does not meet the setbacks required in today’s code from the east or south lot lines. The existing setback to the south property line is 4.3 feet instead of today’s required setback of 5 feet. The average front yard setback is 42.56 ft for the property. The existing structure is non-conforming and measures 39.1ft. The proposed addition will maintain the existing setback on the north side of the house. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Engineering Department has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in their May 18, 2023, memorandum. Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. No mitigation is required. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side – Yard West Rear – Yard South Side – Yard East Side – Front Street 5 feet 25 feet 5 feet 42.56 feet 14.6 feet 109 feet *4.3 feet existing/1.2 feet/ 1.8 feet proposed) *39.1 feet existing/38.44 feet (proposed 8”) Building Height 30 feet 30 feet Building Coverage Lots greater than 9,000sf Impervious Surface Coverage 25% 50% 24.1 % 35.5% First Floor Elevation 30 feet 30 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues  Is the proposed variance justified? Minnesota Statues and Section 36-98 of the Edina Zoning Ordinance require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: STAFF REPORT Page 4 1. Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. “Practical difficulties” may include functional and aesthetic concerns. The practical difficulty is caused by how the existing house is situated on the lot. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and the proposed teardown/rebuild complies with zoning standards with the exception of the south side yard and east front yard setback requirements. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the home and the required setbacks. Due to the removal of the 1st floor, the non- conforming setback standard does not apply. The home will be rebuilt and modified within the existing setbacks, (or slightly closer setback given finish material). The original home was constructed without variances. 2. There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? The existing house has non-conforming setbacks and was built prior to the current ordinance requirements. There were no variances grated for the original construction of the home in 1963. The proposed new home will continue the non-conforming setbacks on the first floor and will introduce a second floor above. The setbacks proposed were allowed in 1963 when the original home was built. Setback requirements have changed over time creating non-conformities. The pre-existing nonconforming setbacks were not self-created by the applicant. The applicant is hoping to create a new home while utilizing the serviceable foundation. With the exception of the variances the proposed addition to the original foundation conforms to all other zoning standards. 3. Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Scott Terrace and the Morningside neighborhood in general is a mixture of lot sizes and shapes with a range of housing styles and a variety of years when built. The proposed project will be consistent with surrounding homes and will enhance the character of the neighborhood. Recommended Action: Approve a 4.12-foot front yard setback variance, a .7-foot side yard setback variance for new building walls and a 1.2- foot side yard setback variance for an overhang for a new home constructed over a nonconforming basement foundation of the existing non-conforming home at 4236 Scott Terrace STAFF REPORT Page 5 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal meets the variance criteria. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the home and existing non-conforming side and front yard setbacks. 2. The proposed re-build on the existing foundation is reasonable with the location not self- created. The current house has non-conforming side and front yard setbacks and was built prior to the current setback requirements. 3. Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Survey and plans date stamped, May 12, 2023 2. Comments and conditions listed in may 18, 2023 Engineering Memo. DATE: 5/18/2023 TO: Cary Teague – Planning Director FROM: Ross Bintner, PE – Engineering Services Manager RE: 4236 Scott Ter - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, stormwater, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed included and existing and proposed survey dated 1/19/2023 and 4/2/2023 Summary of Work The applicant proposes a demo rebuild. The request is for a variance to front and side yard setbacks. Easements No comments. Grading and Drainage The front yard drains to the Scott Terrace and eventually Weber Park. The backyard drains to a landlocked basin. Stormwater Mitigation Stormwater was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 standards. No mitigation is required. Floodplain Development The lowest floor elevation for any new development (new home or new lowest floor) would be required at no less than 905.2’ Erosion and Sediment Control An erosion and sediment control plan was reviewed and is consistent with City of Edina Building Policy SP-002. Street and Driveway Entrance The applicant proposes to replace the driveway. A driveway entrance permit will be required if the driveway apron is replaced or damaged during construction. The street was reconstructed in 2014. Refer to standard plates 525, 540, and 542 for patching requirements. Public Utilities Water and sanitary is served from Scott Terrace. A one-inch water service line from the curb stop to the dwelling is required per the City’s policy SP-024. Sump line available for connection. If connecting to the City sump line, a permit and compliance with City of Edina Building Policy SP-006 will be required. Miscellaneous A Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit may be required; applicant will need to verify with the district. Original structure built in 1963 and the watermain was installed in 1961. Thus, a well is likely not located onsite. Coordination with Minnesota Department of Health will not be required. Retaining wall work is proposed. The applicant will be required to submit drawings, cross-section, and calculations prepared and signed by a Minnesota licensed professional engineer. City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina,MN 55424 re:Variance Application 4236 Scott Terrace,Edina MN 55416 To whom it may concern, Like so many others in our neighborhood,we intend to demolish the home to the existing foundation and build a new two-story home on top of the foundation.We have lived here since 2015 and intend to live here for a long time.It is most desirable,economically feasible and architecturally appropriate to match the footprint of the existing foundation.However,it has come to our attention that when the existing home was built in 1963,it was built closer to the property lines at the front and south side than what meets today’s standards. We would like to formally request your approval for a reduced setback on the front and south sides. Per the attached survey the average front yard setback is 42.56’.The existing structure is non-conforming and measures only 39.1’.Our new second floor will match the 39.1’with a non-livable architectural projection that measures 38.44’.The 8”projection has been added to create visual interest to the front elevation where the exterior finish changes and is critical to the architectural design. According to Edina Zoning Ordinance Sec.36-438,lots under 50’in width require 5’on each side.Per the attached survey,the existing home measures only 4.3’-4.4”at the south side property line.But,it also measures 14.6’along the north side for a total side setback of 20’-0”.This is far greater than the total requirement of 10’-0”providing an abundant amount of open space between homes.We don’t fully understand why,when this home was built,it was built as close as it is to the south property line, but it is what we’ve inherited.And,it is only a mere 7”-8”from compliance. Keeping the floors stacked is the most architecturally suitable solution and will have no negative impact on the overall character of the neighborhood.We believe the proposed design will avoid an awkward offset between floors if the new second floor is required to step back to the 5’setback line. We feel the proposed design is the most appropriate and harmonious solution. To step the entire second floor back 8”would create unnecessary challenges.There is no bearing condition to support an 8”offset floor.In addition,the resulting exterior ledge would invite rain,ice or snow to build up and eventually find its way into the building envelope. Please consider this extraordinary circumstance.Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Kind regards, Joseph and Tisha Backer FO R RE V I E W I N G PU R P O S E S ON L Y 91 REVISIONS BY DESIGN and DRAFTING BY:PHONE: 763.757.5997ANDOVER, MINNESOTAWWW.CROIXDESIGN.COMARCHITECTURAL DESIGN and DRAFTING SERVICEHOME PALN SERVICECUSTOM HOMESREMODELINGFOX HOMESFOR BI D DI N G P U R P O S E O NL Y - N O T INTEN D E D for C O N S T U C TI O N P U R P O S E S 2 9FOX HOMESFOR BI D DI N G P U R P O S E O NL Y - N O T INTEN D E D for C O N S T U C TI O N P U R P O S E S 3 9FOX HOMESFOR BIDDI N G PURP O S E ONLY - NOT INTEN D E D for CONS T U C TI O N PURP O S E S 4 9FOX HOMESFOR BIDDI N G PURP O S E ONLY - NOT INTEN D E D for CONS T U C TI O N PURP O S E S 5 9FOX HOMESFOR BI D DI N G P U R P O S E O NL Y - N O T INTEN D E D for C O N S T U C TI O N P U R P O S E S 6 9FOX HOMESFOR BIDDI N G PURP O S E ONLY - NOT INTEN D E D for CONS T U C TI O N PURP O S E S 79FOX HOMES FOR BIDD ING PURPOSE ON LY - NOT INTENDED f o r CONSTUCT ION PURPOSES 8 9FOX HOMESFOR BIDDI N G PURP O S E ONLY - NOT INTEN D E D for CONS T U C TI O N PURP O S E S 9 9FOX HOMESFOR BIDDI N G PURP O S E ONLY - NOT INTEN D E D for CONS T U C TI O N PURP O S E S S1Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-796417917 Highway No. 7Web: www.advsur.comAdvanceSurveying & Engineering, Co.JOE BACKER4236 SCOTT TERRACE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESSEDINA, MN SHEET TITLEPROPOSED SURVEY &TREE PROTECTION PLANSHEET NO.SHEET 1 OF 1230042 JRDRAWING NUMBERSHEET SIZE: 22 X 34LEGAL DESCRIPTION:The South 49 feet of Lot 36, Morningside, Hennepin County, Minnesota.SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services doesnot include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records orconsult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such aseasements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property.4.Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco.5.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmentalagencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding withconstruction.6.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have alsoprovided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate onlyto the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the surveywhen determining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction.7.This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements orother encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to showany easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon.STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:"●" Denotes iron survey marker,found, unless otherwise noted.PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE (WITH CANT.) 1,666 SQ. FT.DECK* 742 SQ. FT.FRONT PORCH 103 SQ. FT.DECK CREDIT -150 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING 2,361 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 9,798 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 24.1%*(EXCLUDES AREA UNDER CANTILEVERS)DATE DRAFTED:JANUARY 19, 2023MARCH 29, 2021 DATE SURVEYED:SURVEYED BYADVANCE SURVEYING. & ENG., CO.DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE20'10'01 INCH = 10 FEETGRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES:BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN·Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area.·Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has beenestablished and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed toaccommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the nextrain.·A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point tothe site and a 6 inch layer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet from thestreet into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. Theentrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing toprevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potentialentrances that are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotectedexit from the site.·Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets inaccordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided onall proposed storm sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet.Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water forextended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular orpedestrian traffic.DURING CONSTRUCTION:·When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed toprevent escape of sediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas areto remain in place for more than 14 days, they shall be seeded with MinnesotaDepartment of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed bycovering with spray mulch.·A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris.These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowingonto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordancewith Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements.·A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardouswastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements.·Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings assolid waste.·Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall eventsand shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection.·Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has beendeposited it shall promptly be removed.·If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exitingthe site in the rock entrance areas·Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed.·Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall beproperly maintained.·If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump dischargeshall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas canfilter the water before it leaves the site.·Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site isfirst disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department ofTransportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spraymulch.·Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absoluteminimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps orbasins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion.SITE WORK COMPLETION:·When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an “asbuilt” survey shall be done per City of Edina requirements to insure that gradingwas properly done.·When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completedincluding any erosion control blankets for steep areas.·When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion controldevices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleanedas needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean.·Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away fromproposed building.EXISTING HARDCOVERHOUSE 1,567 SQ. FT.DECK 761 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY 736 SQ. FT.REAR STOOP 20 SQ. FT.FRONT STOOP/WALK 137 SQ. FT.SIDE WALK 119 SQ. FT.STONE WALLS 80 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,420 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 9,798 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 34.9%EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGEHOUSE 1,567 SQ. FT.DECK 761 SQ. FT.FRONT STOOP 59 SQ. FT.DECK CREDIT -150 SQ. FT.TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING 2,237 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 9,798 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 22.8%PROPOSED HARDCOVERHOUSE (WITH CANT.) 1,666 SQ. FT.DECK* 742 SQ. FT.DRIVEWAY* 735 SQ. FT.FRONT PORCH 103 SQ. FT.REAR STOOP* 6 SQ. FT.FRONT WALK/STEPS 64 SQ. FT.SIDE WALK 119 SQ. FT.RETAINING WALLS 40 SQ. FT.TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 3,475 SQ. FT.AREA OF LOT 9,798 SQ. FT.LOT COVERAGE 35.5%*(EXCLUDES AREA UNDER CANTILEVERS)#43503LICENSE NO.Wayne W. PreuhsDATEJANUARY 19, 2023 RESOLUTION NO. B-21-13 RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE TO Edina City Code Chapter 36 Article VII Districts and District Regulations at 4236 Scott Terrace. BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 A 4.12-foot front yard and a 1.37-foot side yard setback variance for a 2nd floor addition to 4236 Scott Terrace. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: The South 49 feet of Lot 36. Morningside, Hennepin County, Minnesota 1.03 City Code Chapter 36 requires an average front yard setback of 42.56 ft for the property. The existing structure is non-conforming and measures 39.1ft. The property also requires a minimum 5-foot side yard setback. 1.04 The 4.12-foot front yard and a 1.37-foot side yard setback variance allows a 2nd floor above an existing nonconforming home. 1.05 Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.354, Subdivision 12, and City Code Section 850.04 authorizes the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to grant variances. 1.06 On, May 26, 2021, the Edina Planning Commission, acting as the Board of Adjustments and Appeals, held a public hearing on this application. The applicant was provided the opportunity to present information. The Board considered all of the hearing testimony and the staff report, which are incorporated by reference into this resolution. Section 2. STANDARDS. 2.01 Section 850.04.Subd.1.F. states that the Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the variance would be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Section; that the variance would be consistent with the comprehensive plan; and that there are practical difficulties in complying with this Section. “Practical Difficulties” means that (i) the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by this section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner’s property and the unique circumstance were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner’s property exists under the terms of this Section. Section 3. FINDINGS. 3.01 The proposal meets the variance criteria. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and the proposed addition complies with zoning standards with the exception of the south side yard and east front yard setback requirements. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing location of the home and the required setbacks. Due to the addition being on a different floor, the non-conforming setback standard does not apply. The home will be refurbished and modified within the existing setbacks, (or slightly closer setback given finish material). The original home was constructed without variances and complies with zoning standards. 3.02 The proposed addition is reasonable. The existing house has non-conforming setbacks and was built prior to the current ordinance requirements. There were no variances grated for the original construction of the home in 1963. The proposed addition will continue the non-conforming setback on the second floor that was allowed in 1963 when the original home was built. Setback requirements have changed over time creating non-conformities. This was not self-created by the applicant. The proposed addition conforms to all other zoning standards. 3.03 Granting the variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The addition will match the existing homes side yard setback on the first floor. All other aspects of the addition will conform to the ordinance requirements. Section 4. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS ACTION. 4.01.1 The Edina Planning Commission acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals approves the above-described variance, subject to the above findings. Approval is subject to the following conditions:  Elevations and plans date stamped April12, 2021.  Comments and conditions listed in the May 2, 2021 Engineering Memo. This variance will expire one year from the date of this approval, May 26, 2022, unless the City has issued a building permit for the project covered by this variance or approved a time extension. Adopted by the Planning Commission acting as Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 26, 2021. Planning Commission Chair ATTEST: __________________________________________________ Liz Olson, Planning Division ACTION ON THIS RESOLUTION: Motion for adoption: Berube Seconded by: Strauss Voted in favor of: Berube, Strauss, Agnew, Bartling, Alkire and Chair Nemerov Voted against: None Abstained: None Absent Resolution adopted May 26, 2021 I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals of the City of Edina, Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting held on May 26, 2021. ________________________________ C. B-21-13 – Side and Front Yard Variance – 4236 Scott Terrace Assistant Planner Aaker presented the request of 4236 Scott Terrace for side yard setback and front yard setback variances. Staff recommends approval of the 1.27-foot south side yard setback and the 4.12-foot front yard setback variances, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered questions of the Commission. Appearing for the Applicant Joseph Backer, appellant, and Jason Strodl, architect for the appellants, made presentations to the Commission. The appellant answered Commission questions. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Bartling moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Motion carried. The Commission started deliberation and discussion and indicated support for the proposed house design. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: June 9, 2021 Page 4 of 5 Motion Commissioner Bartling moved that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council of the 1.27-foot south side yard setback and the 4.12-foot front yard setback variances at 4236 Scott Terrace as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The Commission concluded deliberation. Video of the meeting is available on the City website for review of detailed comments. Motion carried unanimously. CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 .PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKER RESIDENCE 4 2 3 6 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 nb1 i1studio 07april 2 0 2 1 tzozi!Jdeto pnis Ptin a. 0 0 9Lif7 g5 uw 'eu!pa ape.i.le 4 4 4o3s 9szt7 301\1301S3d d9N3VEI IND- IALLUVd30 DNININIVIA IZOZ g i &IV VNI03 JO All (t) tamomiremminomeurawata- 1 I r 1 i 1 1 BACKER RESIDENCE 4 236 scot t terrace edina, ni n 55 416 0 7 a pr i I 2 0 2 1 I I 111 CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT n uild studio CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKER RESIDENCE 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 0 7 a pr i I 2 0 2 1 C CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKER RESIDENCE 4 2 3 6 scott terrace mn 5 5 4 1 6 0 /apr i I C) 2 I -e uiid studio REVISION CLOUD BACKER residence a remodel and addition 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 0.) 0 •-ks -o A 2 • o;;;; 0- - 00 of no nu • • • X :2 o3 GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL UNDERGROUND ITEMS WITH THE PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS. CODE REFERENCE SCALE: ni° AREA CALCULATIONS SCALE: nts 2020 MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL CODE 2015 MINNESOTA RESIDENTIAL ENERGY CODE 2020 MINNESOTA MECHANICAL & FUEL GAS CODE 2015 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE MINNESOTA ELECTRIC CODE BASEMENT: EXISTING: ADDITION: TOTAL FIRST FLOOR: FIRST FLOOR: EXISTING: ADDITION: TOTAL FIRST FLOOR: 829 sf 147 sf 976 SF 1,461 St 140 sf 1,601 SF I TOTAL LIVABLE: 4,141 st I NON-LIVABLE EXISTING GARAGE: 403 sf Cabinet Casement Ceiling Closet Clear Concrete Masonry Unit Counter Column Concrete Connection Continuous Corridor Ceramic Tie Center Cold Water Double Petal Drinking Fountain Double Hung Diameter Dimension Dispenser Down Door Opening Downspout Drawing Drawer ROOM LABEL ROOM 101 INTERIOR ELEVATION A KEYNOTE SYMBOL IXI DOOR SYMBOL WINDOW SYMBOL O WALL TYPE SYMBOL WORK POINT OR CONTROL POINT (E) EA EJ ELEC ELEV SNCL E.O.S. EQ EQUIP E.W. EXTG EXT F.A. F.D. FDN F.E.C. F.G. FIN FLR FLUOR F.O.F. F.O.S. FT FTG FURR AREA REFERENCE ETAIL NO. HEET NO. REVISION NO. EXISTING East Each Expansion Joint Electrical Elevation Enclosure Edge of Slab Equal Equipment Each Way Existing Exterior Fixed Fire Alarm Floor Drain Foundation Fire Extinguisher Cob Finish Grade Finish Floor Fluorescent Face of ITnish Face of Stud/Structure Fool, Feet Footing Furring, Furred GA Gouge LAM Laminate GAIN Galvanized LAV Lavatory G.I. Galvanized Iron L.F. Uneol Foot GL Glass, Glazing L.R. Living Room GYP Gypsum MATE Material N.B. Hose Bib MAX Maximum H.C. Holow Core MECH Mechanical HCP Handicapped MEMB Membrane HDWR Hardware MET Metal HDWD Hardwood MFR Manufacture H.M. Hollow Metol MIN Minimum HORIZ Horizontal MIR Manor HS Horizontal Slider MISC Miscelaneous HT Height M.O. Masonry Opening HVAC Heating, Ventilation M.R. Moisture Resistant and Air Conditioning MTD Mounted H.W. Hot Water MUL Mullion I.D. Inside Diameter N North INCL Including N/A Not Applicable INSUL insulation Not In Contract INT Interior NO. Number NOM Nominal JAN Janitor N.T.S. Not to Scale JST JT Joist Joint 0/ Over OA Overall KIT Kitchen O.C. On Center SECOND FLOOR: EXISTING: ADDITION: TOTAL SECOND FLOOR: IECC REQUIREMENTS SCALE: Va CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTATION: AN ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE REPORT MUST ACCOMPANY PLANS FOR REVIEW. THE INFORMATION IN THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE ACCURATELY REFLECTED ON THE BUILDING PLANS. ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED WILL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE INSPECTOR. INSULATION: ALL INSULATION SHALL BE LABELED. FOR BLOW-IN PRODUCTS, ONE PACKAGE MUST BE SAVED FOR FIELD VERIFICATION. BLOW-IN INSULATION CERTIFICATION MUST BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO BUILDING FINAL INSPECTION. BATTS SHALL NOT BE COMPRESSED, AND SHALL BE SPLIT AT ELECTRICAL WIRING AND PIPING INTERRUPTIONS. INSULATION SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUBSTANTIAL CONTACT WITH THE AIR BARRIER. BATTS INSTALLED IN WALLS WITH ONE SIDE OPEN SHALL BE PERMANENTLY HELD IN PLACE BY WIRES, STRAPPING OR STAPLES. WINDOWS: ALL NEW WINDOWS AND DOORS MUST DISPLAY NFRC LABELS, CLEARLY DISPLAYING U-VALUES AND SHGC COEFFICIENTS (FOR GLAZED AREA) FOR FIELD VERIFICATION. RE-USED/UNLABELED WINDOWS OR DOORS MUST MEET MINIMUM DEFAULT VALUES LISTED IN CODE. SKYLIGHTS: NFRC LABELS SHALL BE CLEARLY DISPLAYED, LISTING U AND SHGC VALUES. SKYLIGHT SHAFTS SHALL BE INSULATED WITH R-13 INSULATION, SECURED IN PLACE. CAULKING AND SEALANTS: EXTERIOR JOINTS, SEAMS OR PENETRATIONS IN THE AIR BARRIER THAT ARE SOURCES OF AIR LEAKAGE, SHALL BE SEALED WITH DURABLE CAULKING MATERIALS, CLOSED WITH GASKETING SYSTEMS, TAPED OR COVERED WITH MOISTURE VAPOR-PERMEABLE HOUSEWRAP. PROVIDE CAULKING OR SILL SEAL AT JOINT BETWEEN SILL PLATES OF FRAMED EXTERIOR WALLS AND FOUNDATION. THE SPACE BETWEEN FRAMED ROUGH OPENINGS AND DOOR OR WINDOW FRAMES MUST BE FOAM INSULATED OR CAULKED. SEAL RECESSED LIGHTING. PUMBING, ELECTRICAL BOX AND WIRING PENETRATIONS IN THE AIR BARRIER AGAINST AIR INFILTRATION. EXTERIOR DOORS MUST BE WEATHER-STRIPPED. ATTIC ACCESS OPENING COVERS MUST BE GASKETED TO PREVENT AIR LEAKAGE. HVAC SYSTEM: MECHANICAL EFFICIENCY AND CAPACITY OF NEW UNITS MUST APPEAR ON EQUIPMENT. THERMOSTATS: DEVICES SHALL HAVE A DEADBAND RANGE OF F WITHIN WHICH THE SUPPLY OF HEATING AND COOLING ENERGY IS SHUT OFF OR REDUCED TO A MINIMUM. HEAT PUMPS: SYSTEMS HAVING SUPPLEMENTARY ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE HEATERS SHALL HAVE CONTROLS THAT PREVENT THE HEATER OPERATION WHEN THE HEATING LOAD IS CAPABLE OF BEING MET BY THE PUMP. DUCTS AND PLENUMS: ALL SUPPLY AND RETURN-AIR PLENUMS SHALL HAVE ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS SECURELY FASTENED AND SEALED WITH WELDS, GASKETS, MASTICS, MASTIC-PLUS-EMBEDDED-FABRIC SYSTEMS OR APPROVED TAPES. DUCT AND PLENUM INSULATION: UNLESS LOCATED IN CONDITIONED SPACE, ALL SUPPLY DUCTS AND PLENUMS SHALL HAVE MINIMUM R-6 INSULATION. RETURN AIR DUCTS AND PLENUMS SHALL BE INSULATED WITH MINIMUM R-6 INSULATION. HOT WATER HEATERS: UNITS SHALL BE LABELED AS TO THEIR INPUT RATING EFFIICENCY. FOR NON-CIRCULATING HOT WATER SYSTEMS, ALL HOT WATER PIPING INSTALLED IN UNCONDITIONED SPACES, INCLUDING UNDER SLABS, SHALL BE INSULATED WITH R-2 (MIN.) CIRCULATING HOT WATER HEATING HOT WATER LINES SHALL BE INSULATED WITH R-2 PIPE INSULATION (MIN.) ABBREVIATIONS LIST And At Centerline Diameter or Round Number Anchor Bolt Air Conditioning Asphaltic Concrete Acoustical Tie Area Drain Adjustable Above Finish Floor Above Finish Grade Aluminum Access Panel Approximate Architectural Board Bituminous Building Block Blocking Beam Bottom Bedroom Built Up Rooting SCALE: n/o • ARCHITECT jasonstrodl [a d a p tura) 4201 GRIMES AVE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55416 (702) 629-7222 SURVEYOR ADVANCE SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING, CO. 17917 HIGHWAY NO. 7 MINNETONKA, MN 55345 (952) 474-7964 0 sf 1,564 sf 1,564 SF BUILDING HEIGHT: 6.27-9" (30'-Cr ALLOWABLE) LOT SIZE: 9,800 SF ALLOWABLE LOT 2,450 SF (25%MAX) COVERAGE: VICINITY MAP O.D. Outside Diameter South TEL Telephone SCALE: 015 OFF Office S.C. Solid Core TEMP Tempered, Temperature O.H. Overhang SCHED Schedule THK Thick, Thickness OVHD Overhead SECT Section THR Threshold OPNG Opening SEP Separotion, Separate TOIL Toilet OPP Opposite SH Shelf T.O.P. Top of Pavement PL P.L. Plate Property line SH SH &P Single Hung Shelf and Pole T.O.S. T.P.D. Top of Slab Toilet Paper Dispenser EXCELSIOR PLMG Plumbing SIM Simlar T.W. Top of Wall PIAM Plastic Laminate SLDG Siding T.S. Top of Steel 42ND PLAS Plaster SPEC Specification TV Television 44TH PLYWD Plywood SQ Square T.O. Top of PR Pair SS. Stainless Steel TYP Typical PT Paint S.SK. Service Sink PTN PTRY Partition Poetry STD STL Standard Steel UNF U.N.O. Unfinished Unless Noted Otherwise 50TH 54TH RAD R.D. Riser Radius Roof Drain STOR STRUCT SUSP SW Storage Structural Suspended Switch VERT VEST V.I.F. Vertical Vestibule Verily In Field REF Reference Symmetrical VOL Volume REFR REINF Refrigerator Reinforced, Reinforcing SYM SYS System W West O O REQ'D Required Tread W.H. Water Heater 1-62 RESIL Resilient T.B. Towel Bar W.C. Water Closet REV Revised / Reversed T&G Tongue & Groove WD Wood RM Room T.O.C. Top of Curb WP Waterproof R.O. Rough Opening T.O.D. Top of Drain WSCT Wainscot SYMBOLS LIST SCALE: T74.-T.---Cr MATERIALS LIST SCALE: nie BUILDING GRID LINES O O EXTERIOR ELEVATION NORTH SECTION CEILING HEIGHT OR EQUIPMENT NUMBER DETAIL GRID REFERENCE ELEVATION REFERENCE SECTION NO. SHEET NO. ROOM NAME ROOM NO. ELEVATION NO. (TYPICAL) SHEET NO. KEYNOTE NO. ROOM NO. REFERENCE NO. WINDOW TYPE WALL TYPE REFERENCE CEILING HEIGHT OR ITEM NUMBER CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT STONE 2X4 WOOD FRAMING 2X6 WOOD FRAMING CONCRETE (SECTION VIEW) 1,11. /11,1,411k. EARTH TURF WATER INSULATION GENERAL NOTES SCALE: DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS ALL WORK, MATERIAL, METHODS, ETC. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES THE CONTRACTOR AND SUB-CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND FAMILIARIZE THEMSELVES WITH CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BID. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL THE TEMPORARY SHORING AND BRACING TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE WORK UNTIL IT IS IN ITS COMPLETE FORM. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ANY DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHTIECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL DIMENSIONS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ARE TO FACE OF STUD (F.OS.), U.N.O. ALL DIMENSIONS OF CASEWORK ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (F.O.F.) SCALE: nia 0 AB A/C A.C. ACT AD ADJ A.F.F. A.F.G. ALUM A.P. APPROX ARCH BD BITUM BLDG BLK BLKG BM BOT BED B.U.R. CAB CASE CLG CLO CLR C.M.U. CNTR COL CONC CONN CONT CORR C.T. CTR C.W. DBL DET D.F. DH DIA DIM DISP DN D.O. DS DWG DWR CONSULTANT LIST PROJECT INFORMATION SCALE: SHEET INDEX SCALE: ni° ARCHITECTURAL A0.0 PROJECT INFO, SHEET INDEX A0.2 DEMOLITION PLANS A1.0 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A2.1 BASEMENT PLAN & FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN & ROOF PLAN A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4.1 BUILDING SECTIONS CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRO IFC:T• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scan terrace edlna, mn 55416 HARRIET LAKE PROJECT SITE REVISION • SHEET TITI F• COVER SHEET GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX SHFFT• a0.0 S II RmITTAI • VARIANCE REQUEST DATE 4/7/21 PROPERTY OWNER: JOSEPH & TISHA BACKER PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4236 SCOTT TERRACE EDINA, MN 55416 PROPERTY APN: 07-028-24-41-0055 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REMODEL AND ADDITION OF A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONING: R-1 OCCUPANCY: R-3, U CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE 5-B # STORIES: 2.5 STORIES 1 (BELOW GRADE) DEMOLITION NOTES DEMOLITION LEGEND wi EPARTMENT PRCHFC.T• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scoff terrace edina, mn 55416 HFFT TITI F DEMOLITION PLANS SI-IFFT• A0.2 SURIAITTAI • VARIANCE REQUEST DATF• 0 4/7/21 EXISTING FIREPLACE AND HEARTH TO REMAIN AS-IS. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW DEMOLISH EXISTING KITCHEN COMPLETE: CABINETS, FIXTURES, APPLIANCES, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW DEMOLISH EXISTING 3-SEASON PORCH COMPLETE REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND WALL FRAMING REMOVE EXISTING STAIR AND WALL FRAMING r, EXISTING FLOORING TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FLOORING TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE 7 n__ _J L___J L--_J L___J I L _ L I I L „ I L _ J _ r -- I I L _ I I I —I I I :14 I IA NOT IN SCOPE L LI EXISTING FLOORING TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE EXISTING FLOORING TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE /, I I LC A i; t(----- REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW 4 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW 4- REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND WALL FRAMING THIS AREA REMOVE EXISTING CLOSET DOOR AND FRAMING REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW AND PORTION OF WALL FRAMING FOR NEW OPENING REMOVE EXISTING DOOR AND TRIM, TYPICAL THIS FLOOR REMOVE EXISTING WALL FRAMING, DOORS, CLOSET FIXTURES THIS AREA DEMOLISH EXISTING BATHROOM COMPLETE. FLOORING, FIXTURES, CABINETS, ETC. DEMOLISH EXISTING DOOR AND CLOSET FRAMING REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR JOISTS THIS AREA FOR NEW STAIR REMOVE EXISTING WALL FRAMING, DOORS. CLOSET FIXTURES THIS AREA REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW AND PORTION OF WALL FRAMING FOR NEW DOOR OPENING REMOVE EXISTING ROOF COMPLETE SCALE: ye= r-cr FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN (-Th „,4 SCALE: 1/4* = 1.-0 BASEMENT DEMOLITION PLAN " 1 01 0 U ni tx o < LL 03 —1—/ SFAI 2 2021 EXISTING BRICK VENEER TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE DOOR AND MOTOR r REMOVE EXISTING FLOORING AND BASE AT HALLWAY, EXISTING CABINET TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACEj7- EXISTING FIREPLACE AND HEARTH TO REMAIN AS-IS — — I ---II ///////////////7 NOT IN SCOPE REMOVE PORTION OF EXISTING WALL REMOVE EXISTING STAIR EXISTING WATER HEATER. REPLACE AS NEEDED REMOVE EXISTING BOILER. HVAC CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE SPACE FOR NEW FURNACE REMOVE EXISTING CABINET AND STORE ON-SITE FOR OWNERS REUSE REMOVE EXISTING WALL FRAMING AND DOOR AREA TO BE CLEARED FOR NEW STAIR. EXISTING MASONRY FOUNDATION WALL TO REMAIN F -71 I X I SCALE: n/a 1. DEMOLITION DRAWINGS ARE INTENDED FOR CONVENIENCE AND INFORMATION ONLY. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE EXTENT OF DEMOLION WITH ALL ALTERATION PLANS ANC ELEVATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL ERECT ALL SHORING, BRACING, TEMPORARY SUPPORT, AND BARRIERS AS REQUIRED BY CITY AND STATE REGULATIONS PRIOR TO DEMOLTION AND UNTIL COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT AS REQUIRED BY PROJECT SCOPE. a CONTRACTOR IS TO REMOVE ALL DEMOLISHED MATERIALS FROM THE SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE AGENCY CODES AND REGULATIONS. 4, CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING MECHANICAL, PLUMBING AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND SHALL PROTECT THOSE SYSTEMS THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE WORK. 5. REMOVE EXISTING BASEBOARDS AND DOOR TRIM AT FIRST FLOOR. 6. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PRICING OPTION, TO REMOVE AND REPLACE ALL INTERIOR DOORS AND JAMBS IN BASEMENT. CITY 01 APR 1 PLANNING C) SCALE: ix =1.-o- I I EXISTING ITEM TO REMAIN 1- EXISTING ITEM TO BE REMOVED EXISTING AREA NOT IN SCOPE. TO REMAIN AS-IS 0 -U 2,; o 0 C ON F- >0 — 0. e'0 nF • 0 0 w 0 OS C EXISTING GARAGE 48.47' LAWN FAI EXISTING GARAGE EXISTING DECK (761 SP) 1V-0* mom • NEW WOOD STEPS AND LANDING TO MATCH EXISTING DECK INA CITY OF E 021 APR 1 2 EXISTING FOOTPRINT (1,567 SF) PO 07-02844-41-0055 - i i PRO CT• PLANNING DEPA &VA SIS A I D D D EN ITI C O E N 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 g:. EXISTING HOME 7,-0° EXISTING HOME UP to SFT'-4 PORCH (120 SF) FVIsIoNS• SHEET TITI F ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PORCH FRAMING SH F F T • al.0 SlIBMITTAI • VARIANCE REQUEST 1lATF• 4/7/21 CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL AND CONCRETE STEPS CO CRETE. DRIV WAY 1/2. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SCALE: I. = UP UP IF 0 I LAWN NOT IN SCOPE PLAN NOTES SCALE: N/A 1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS 2. ALL WORK, MATERIAL, METHODS, ETC. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES 3. CONTRACTOR/OWNER-BUILDER TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALL DIMENSIONS AFTER DEMOLITION AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION 4. ALL DIMENSIONS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ARE TO FACE OF STRUCTURE (F.0.5.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 5. ALL DIMENSIONS OF CASEWORK ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (F.aF.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 6. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (F.O.F.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 7. ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS DIMENSIONED TO CENTER OF CLEAR OPENING 8. NEW EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE PROVIDED WITH MINIMUM R-20 INSULATION 9. NEW FRAMING IN BASEMENT AT EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE PROVIDED WITH R-I3 BATT INSULATION 10. NEW INTERIOR WALLS AT BATHROOMS AND LAUNDRY ROOM TO BE PROVIDED WITH MINIMUM R-13 INSULATION II. NEW INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING TO BE 1/7' SMOOTH WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH AND SQUARE CORNER BEAD. 12. CEILINGS TO BE PROVIDED WITH 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING. 13. WOOD FLOORING AT FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR TO MATCH EXISTING. ALL WOOD FLOORS TO BE REFINISHED PER ARCHITECTS SAMPLE. 14. BASEBOARD TO BE 5-1/2" X 1/2" MDF. 15. DOOR CASING TO BE 7' X 1/2" MDF. 16. INTERIOR DOORS TO BE FLUSH WOOD VENEER PER ARCHITECTS SAMPLE. 17. ALL WINDOW AND DOOR SIZES SHOWN ARE WxH AND MEASURED IN FEET-INCHES Q.E. 2668 ISA 7-6" x 6.-8" DOOR) 18. ATTIC TO BE PROVIDED WITH MIN R-49 INSULATION 19. NEW PAINT THROUGHOUT. KEYNOTES 0 SCALE: N/A 1. 36" HIGH WALL-MOUNTED HANDRAIL. 2. WOOD STAIR TREADS AND LANDING 3. SHELF AND POLE 4. BARN DOOR TRACK AND DOOR. PROVIDE BACKING. 5. NEW GARAGE DOOR AND MOTOR 6. LINE OF FLOOR ABOVE 7. TILE OR VINYL PLANK FLOORING 8. 20-MIN FIRE RATED SELF-CLOSING DOOR CITY OF EDINi APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALL LEGEND KEYNOTES 0 HVAC CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LAYOUT OF MECHANICAL ROOM FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: I/4 = 1-0 CONTRACTOR TO RAISE CEILING HEIGHT TO 5,-1" ABOVE FINISH FLOOR ENGINEERING FOR ALL STEEL AND LUMBER SIZES, BEAMS, HEADERS, TRUSSES, POSTS, ETC TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE BY CONTRACTOR BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = SCALE: 1/4' = 11-0* 1164MBLI 2X4 WOOD STUDS 8 16" O.C. =EC= 2X6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. =ow BRICK VENEER. MATCH EXISTING I I EXISTING ITEM _7:31 SOFFN I S H F FT• A2.1 SIIRMITTAI VARIANCE REQUEST TF• 4/7/21 r F >0 . aw NF 4.0 • • o .0 < •• • 3 03 12. 34' HIGH 2X4 PONY WALL BELOW 13. LOW CABINET 14. LINE OF WALL BELOW SCALE: N/A 1. 36" HIGH HANDRAIL 2. FLOATING WOOD TREADS AND LANDING 3. SHELF AND POLE 4. LINE OF FLOOR/ROOF ABOVE 5. 3" DIAMETER STEEL POST, TYPICAL OF (4) DINING 9'-1" 1/3.2 V-0" 6'-6" 2'-10" ESINK/WDW ALI OVEN REF NOT IN SCOPE PDR. T _ COAT 7-11" tSINK 0 6' -I I" 1 4 V -4 UP 14 STAIR -I- T 9'-1" 7.-0- 9. DOUBLE CORNER FRAMELESS GAS FIREPLACE UNIT. MFR: FLARE MODEL: FLARE-DC-45-H 10. LINE OF UPPER CABINET AND/OR FLOATING SHELF I I. WOOD CAP AT TOP OF THICKENED BASEMENT WALL 6. 2X4 WOOD SLATS 7. EXISTING FIREPLACE AND HEARTH TO REMAIN AS-IS. CONTRACTOR TO MATCH BRICK VENEER WHERE CEILING IS RAISED. PROVIDE MASONRY FLUE ADAPTER AND TYPE 'A' METAL FLUE THROUGH ROOF. 8. TV NICHE S 2-2 FLOOR TRUSS DIRECTION LIVING V-1" 1/3.1 FAMILY 9'-1" FLOOR TRUSS DIRECTION INFILL EXISTING WINDOW OPENING INFILL EXISTING WINDOW OPENING -.4411111111.... I/3.1 SF AI • PRO IFCT• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scott terrace edIna, mn 55416 REVISIONS_: S HFFT TITI F• BASEMENT PLAN 1/3.2 1".111111/ HALL ENGINEERING FOR ALL STEEL AND LUMBER SIZES, BEAMS, HEADERS, TRUSSES, POSTS, ETC TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE BY CONTRACTOR / WH CH, 0 SFAI • CRICKET, TYPICAL LOW-SLOPE ROOF WITH SINGLE-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE V.I.F. 1W-I 1/2* 4,-3' tr-8" 1/3.2 '-'111111111118.- 0 LilL I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I t34 - - '-I1 2'-5' SINK SINK e-6* 0.4 D 1 I J _L CO +17 2-8" LOFT 9.-1" 3V-2 1/2' 5'-1 1/3.2 LINE OF WALL BELOW \-• PARAPET WALL WITH SHEET METAL PARAPET CAP C SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT, TYPICAL LDRY in M. BED 9'-1" RD1 )OF 1CTT(if > 1.4 IIIIIIIIIII ESIII 111111111 SINK 0" 4.-8" 12'-3 /2 C-I0" N r-6. 2868 CPT ID OPEN TO BELOW E.- BED 2 W I" 2869 H CO EQUAL EQUAL L 2868 1 111111111 11 • 1/3.1 LOW ROOF WITH SINGLE-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE 1/3.1 CO CITY OF EDINA V.I.F. V.I.F. 2868 < R°,`,'EFcTg,S, > ATH 2L 7c, U 9'-1 DN 3' -10' 7'-10" 10 -0' V-te 1.-7 3/4/-2 3/4', 20.-2 1/2 APR 1 2 2021 PLAN NOTES SCALE: N/A I. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS 2. ALL WORK, MATERIAL METHODS, ETC. SHALL CONFORM TO ALL GOVERNING BUILDING CODES, REGULATIONS AND AGENCIES 3. CONTRACTOR/OWNER-BUILDER TO VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ALL DIMENSIONS AFTER DEMOLITION AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT OF ANY INCONSISTENCIES OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION 4, ALL DIMENSIONS OF NEW CONSTRUCTION ARE TO FACE OF STRUCTURE IF.O.S.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE -0 5. ALL DIMENSIONS OF CASEWORK ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (F.O.F.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 6. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EXISTING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (W.F.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 7. ALL DOORS AND WINDOWS DIMENSIONED TO CENTER OF CLEAR OPENING 8. NEW EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE PROVIDED WITH MINIMUM R-20 INSULATION 9. NEW FRAMING IN BASEMENT AT EXTERIOR WALLS TO BE PROVIDED WITH R-13 BATT INSULATION 10. NEW INTERIOR WALLS AT BATHROOMS AND LAUNDRY ROOM 70 BE PROVIDED WITH MINIMUM R-13 INSULATION 11. NEW INTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING TO BE 1/2" SMOOTH WITH LEVEL 5 FINISH AND SQUARE CORNER BEAD. 12. CEILINGS TO BE PROVIDED WITH 5/8" TYPE 'X' GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING. 13. WOOD FLOORING AT FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR TO MATCH EXISTING. ALL WOOD FLOORS TO BE REFINISHED PER ARCHITECTS SAMPLE. 14. BASEBOARD TO BE 5-1/2" X 1/2' MDF. 15. DOOR CASING TO BE TX 1/2" MDF. 16. INTERIOR DOORS TO BE FLUSH WOOD VENEER PER ARCHITECTS SAMPLE. 17. ALL WINDOW AND DOOR SIZES SHOWN ARE WxH AND MEASURED IN FEET-INCHES (I.E. 2668 ISA 2-6" x 6.-8" DOOR) 18. ATTIC TO BE PROVIDED WITH MIN R-49 INSULATION 19. NEW PAINT THROUGHOUT. KEYNOTES 1:1 SCALE: N/A I. 36" HIGH HANDRAIL 2. FLOATING WOOD TREADS AND LANDING 3. SHELF AND POLE 4. LINE OF FLOOR/ROOF BELOW 5. 36" HIGH PONY WALL WITH WOOD CAP 6. WINDOW SEAT WITH WOOD SURROUND. CENTER ABOVE FIRST FLOOR WINDOW BELOW. 7. OPEN SHELVES 8. 6S' FREESTANDING TUB AND FILLER 9. SHOWER CURB 10. FRAMELESS GLASS SHOWER ENCLOSURE 11. SOAP NICHE 12. METAL FLASHING 13. STEEL WINDOW SURROUND 14. LOW ROOF 15. CUSTOM CLOSET CABINETRY BY OWNER PRO 1FCT• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scoff terrace edlna, mn 55416 12FV1SIONS• SHFFT TITI F• SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHFFI WALL LEGEND SCALE: 1/4' = l'-0" 2X4 WOOD STUDS W 16" O.C. ROOF PLAN PLAN SCALE: 1/4' = 1'-0' SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1.-0" ENGINEERING FOR ALL STEEL AND LUMBER SIZES, BEAMS, HEADERS, TRUSSES, POSTS, ETC TO BE PROVIDED ON-SITE BY CONTRACTOR 0:=B 2X6 WOOD STUDS @ 16" 0.C. :JLANNING DEPARTMC4g. EXISTING BRICK VENEER. MATCH I I EXISTING ITEM i z ] SOFFIT A2.2 SIIRMITTAI • VARIANCE REQUEST DATF• 4/7/21 VAI A KEYNOTES CI SCALE: N/A 1. FIREPLACE FLUE 2. PARAPET CAP FLASHING 3. VERTICAL WOOD SIDING 4. STEEL WINDOW SURROUND 5. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 6. BRICK VENEER. MATCH EXISTING WHERE NEW. 7. 36" HIGH RAILING WITH WOOD CAP AND 1/T DIAMETER HORIZONTAL RAILS. 8. 3" DIAMETER STEEL POST, TYPICAL OF (4) 9. EXISTING STUCCO FINISH. REPAIR AS NEEDED. 10. LINE OF BASEMENT BELOW GRADE II. EXISTING WINDOW 12. DOWNSPOUT 13. LIGHT FIXTURE 14. IX4 WOOD WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL AT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 15. 8x6x16 HONED CMU BLOCK E ELEV: 8'4" V F.F.E. (1st) A ELEV:0'-0" F.F.E. (BASEMENT) EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: ve =1.-o- Co o A ELEV: 32.-Cf TOP OF PARAPET t Err• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 RFVISIONS' I.:;1.1 • EDINA APh 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT S HFFT TITI F• EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHFFT FRONT STEPS OMITTED FOR CLARITY A3.1 SURAAITTAI VARIANCE REQUEST nATF • 3 4/7/21 EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: ve = r-o- 4,i ( L )rr Ey gr - 2 1/2" L._ ,11--17=' OPEN TO BEYOND T r /\ A ELEV: V F.F.E. ( I st) r r,`„._, • El u r- (sr z 9 _r j rQim J 1:1 L =1 AVERAGE FRONT YARD GRADE ELEV:0'-e. F.F.E. (BASEMENT) A ELEV: 19'-41/7' F.F.E. (2nd) ELEV: 17'-8" V 8.0. TRUSS TOP IDEV:03F2'. PARAPET A ELEV: 28'.5 1/2" V TOP PLATE \ ELEV: 19'-41/T F.F.E. (2nd) A ELEV: 17'-8" 1. 8.0. TRUSS SFAL• LINE OF EXISTING TOP PLATE z ELEV: 37-0' TOP OF PARAPET L ELEV:28L5 1/2" TOP PLATE z A ELEV: 19'-4 1/2" F.F.E. (2nd) \ A ELEV: 17-13" 1. B.O. TRUSS LINE OF EXISTING TOP PLATE CO ELEV:ty-r F.F.E. (1st) A C SFAI KEYNOTES El SCALE: N/A 1. FIREPLACE FLUE 2. PARAPET CAP FLASHING 3. VERTICAL WOOD SIDING 4. STEEL WINDOW SURROUND 5. BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 6. BRICK VENEER. MATCH EXISTING WHERE NEW. 7. 36^ HIGH RAILING WITH WOOD CAP AND 1/T DIAMETER HORIZONTAL RAILS. 8. 3' DIAMETER STEEL POST, TYPICAL OF (4) 9. EXISTING STUCCO FINISH. REPAIR AS NEEDED. 10. LINE OF BASEMENT BELOW GRADE 11. EXISTING WINDOW 12. DOWNSPOUT 13. LIGHT FIXTURE 14. IX4 WOOD WINDOW TRIM, TYPICAL AT BOARD AND BATTEN SIDING 15. 8x6x16 HONED CMU BLOCK ELEV:G-O' F.F.E. (BASEMENT) EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4 1-0 OO Ell 714/03FWRAPET PRO IFCT• 14 BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 ELEV: 28'-51/7' TOP PLATE 111111111 /\ ELEV: 19'-4 1/2' F.F.E. (2nd) /\ ELEV: 17.-8" B.O. TRUSS LINE OF EXISTING TOP PLATE RF VISIONS ELEV:8*-7" V F.P.E. (1st) - -I I I I I I I OH OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 SHFFT TITI F• EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A ELEV: ty-a. F.F.E. (BASEMENT) PLANNING DEPARTMENT SliFFT EXISTING DECK OMITTED FOR CLARITY A3.2 SUIIMITTAI EXTERIOR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4 1-0 VARIANCE REQUEST nATF• 4/7/21 0 A ELEV; 32,0" ' TOP OF PARAPET ELEV: 28,5 1/T TOP PLATE A ELEV: 19,4 1/T F.F.E. (2nd) A EL EV: 17,8' B.O. TRUSS r t ; ELEV: (Y-Cf .1" F.F.E. (BASEMENT) BUILDING SECTION GARAGE BASEMENT BED 2 WIC 6666o666& M.BATH BED 3 BATH 2 1 1161 1111 666666666 4114 66 46 664 1161°6644 466 114 644 LIVING L 17 DINING KITCHEN Min i HE ME I ME MEM - -CI 11 II II 0 II II 11 IIf IT 11 II II II 0 11 II II It I_ 0 6 E PDR SI El 9 6 ili6414461616' 4t4t416t444*6 WM4496‘6141641176 941446111111 6666666666666666666666666 6666 4 6 " OFFICE ELEV: 32,C1' TOP OF PARAPET n A ELEV: 0,0" F.F.E. (BASEMENT) HALL 6 I1 o 6 BASEMENT A ELEV: 28,5 1/2" TOP PLATE A ELEV: 19,4 1/2" F.F.E. (2nd) A_ELEV: 17'-8" 8.0. TRUSS A ELEV: F.F.E. (151) LOFT IE BED 3 j, J 6 DINING SCALE: 1/4 = 1-0 BUILDING SECTION SCALE: 1/4 6 1'-0 PLAN /Th SCALE: N/A 1. SINGLE-PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE OVER PLYWOOD SHEATHING 2. R-49 INSULATION WITH 4 MILLIMETER MOISTURE MEMBRANE AT CEILING 3. ENGINEERED ROOF TRUSS. SIZE AND SPACING PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER 4. 2x6 WOOD STUDS 0 16" O.C. WITH 9/16" OSB SHEATHING TYPICAL AT EXTERIOR WALLS. PROVIDE BUILDING WRAP AND EXTERIOR FINISH PER ELEVATIONS 5. 5/8' DRYWALL AT CEILINGS 6. 1/2' DRYWALL AT INTERIOR WALLS, TYPICAL 7. R-20 INSULATION WITH 4 MILLIMETER MOISTURE BARRIER APPLIED TO INTERIOR SIDE OF WALL 8. ENGINEERED FLOOR TRUSS. PROVIDE HEEL AT BOTTOM TO EXTEND CEILING HEIGHT AS SHOWN. SIZE AND SPACING PER TRUSS MANUFACTURER. 9. FLOOR SHEATHING 10. EXISTING FLOOR JOIST 11. EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK FOUNDATION WALL 12. EXISTING WALL FRAMING WITH 8'-o" TOP PLATE. 13. WINDOW/DOOR ASSEMBLY 14. R20 SPRAY FOAM INSULATION AT RIM JOIST 15. HEADER PER CODE 16. TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD PLANK SOFFIT 17. EXISTING MASONRY CHIMNEY 18. TYPE A FLUE VENT 19. STEEL WINDOW SURROUND 20. WINDOW SEAT 21. ARCHITECTURAL POP-OUT FRAMING 22. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY 23. LINE OF EXISTING TOP PLATE 24. LINE OF EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL ;ITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 \JING DEPARTMENT GENERAL NOTES SCALE: N/A 1. CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH FIGURES R602,3(1) AND R602.3(2( AND FASTENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE R602.3(1) THROUGH R602.3(4) 2. SHEATH ENTIRE EXTERIOR SIDE OF NEW CONSTRUCTION WITH OSB PER R602.10.4.2 FOR CONTINUOUS STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING 3. CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH FIGURE R602.10.7 FOR END CONDITIONS FOR BRACED WALL LINES W/ CONTINUOUS STRUCTURAL PANEL SHEATHING 4. FLOOR SHEATHING TO BE PLACED IN STAGGERED PATTERN NAILED W/ 8d NAILS (2-1/T x 0.131 0) @ 6" O.C. AT PANEL EDGES E. 0 1 2' O.C. AT INTERIOR 5. SILL PLATES TO BE ANCHORED WITH ANCHORS 0 6' O.C. MAX AND A MINIMUM OF TWO ANCHORS PER SILL SECTION. ALL SECTIONS ARE TO HAVE AN ANCHOR WITHIN 4" TO 12' OF EACH END. AN ANCHOR IS TO BE PLACED AT ALL WALL CORNERS AND INTERSECTIONS ON WALLS MORE THAN TWO FEET IN LENGTH KEYNOTES 0 SFAI • PRO IFC-T• BACKER RESIDENCE REMODEL/ADDITION 4236 scott terrace edina, mn 55416 RFVISMNS• SHFFT TITI E• BUILDING SECTION SHEFT• A4.1 SURMITTA1 • VARIANCE REQUEST nATF• 4/7/21 I NO 0 N U ei • 0 . r " 00 '••• < ts. X 0 X GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGIN • Install silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. • Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and then shall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activity but must be replaced before the next rain. • A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inch layer of I to 2 inch rock extending al least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlain with permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressing or washing to prevent trucking or flow of sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potential entrances that are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. • Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the city standard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed slums sewer inlets immediately following construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impound water for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION: • When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape of sediment laden runolTand if the piles or other disturbed areas arc to remain in place for more than 14 days. they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-11 I at 100 Ib/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • A clumsier shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpsters shall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal of solid wastes from the site shall in accordance wills Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. • A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall be disposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. • Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings us solid waste. • Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall be cleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. • Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and Whiter or soils has been deposited it shall promptly be removed. • If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the nick entrance areas • Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. • Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for me by workers arid shall be properly maintained. • Hit becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into the stockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filler the water before it leaves the site. 44.8 - - INSTALL SILT FENCE/810 ROLL • • r--PROPOSED WALK/STEPS • rn E - k 909,61 to X )10.9 EXISTING GARAGE 5 911 x • • Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days ager the site is first disturbed and shall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Sccd Mixture 22-11 l at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. • Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment imps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemed necessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION: • When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or soil an "as built" survey shall be done per City of Edina requirements to insure that grading was properly done. • When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including any erosion control blankets for sleep areas. • When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall be disposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that is erosion resistant and clean. • Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. No --t--T-x 912.6 ;sr EXISTING HARDCOVER EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE HOUSE 1,567 SO. FT. HOUSE 1,587 SO. FT. DECK 761 SO. FT. DECK 761 SO. FT. DRIVEWAY 736 SO. FT. FRONT STOOP 59 SO. FT. REAR STOOP 20 SO. FT. DECK CREDIT -150 SO. FT. FRONT STOOP/WALK 137 SO. FT. SIDE WALK 119 SO. FT. TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING 2,237 SO. FT. STONE WALLS 80 SO. FT. AREA OF LOT 9,798 SO. FT. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 2,659 SO. FT. LOT COVERAGE 22.8% AREA OF LOT 9,798 SO. FT. LOT COVERAGE 27.1% (DECK NOT INCLUDED, PERVIOUS AREA BELOW) PROPOSED HARDCOVER PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE FT. HOUSE 1,567 50. DECK 761 SO. FT. HOUSE 1,567 SO. FT. DRIVEWAY 740 SO. FT. DECK 761 SO. FT. FRONT PORCH 122 SO. FT. FRONT PORCH 122 SO. FT. REAR STOOP 20 SO. FT. DECK CREDIT -150 SO. FT. FRONT WALK/STEPS 184 SO. FT. SIDE WALK 119 SO. FT. TOTAL PROPOSED BUILDING 2,300 SO. FT. RETAINING WALLS 51 SO. FT. AREA OF LOT 9,798 SO. FT. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 3,564 SO. FT. LOT COVERAGE 23.5'. AREA OF LOT 9,798 SO. FT. LOT COVERAGE 36.4% (DECK NOT INCLUDED, PERVIOUS AREA BELOW) LEGEND EXIST/NO CONTOUR EN/STING SPOT ELEVATION PROPOSED CONTOUI? PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DRAINAGE ARCO, - FLOP' SILT FENCE/BM ROLL TREE REMOVAL PROTECT EXISTINC TREE /INSTALL ORANGE CONST FENCE AROUND TREE 212 PROTECT/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The South 49 feet of Lot 36, Morningside, Hennepin County, Minnesota. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: I. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services docs not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction. 6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site. We have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for toe on this site or before beginning construction. 7. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones shown hereon. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "•" Denotes iron survey marker,found, sinless otherwise noted. N 89 °25'29" E 199.85 x xgr..3.1 Sr EXISTING DWELLING X 910.5 .910 - SF - rn x 411-119 1x 90, 200.15 :4> .910 -90 6." EXISTING GARAGE X 912.5 X iie.2 2.2 912. X 913.2 N, EXISTING DECK N 89°43'29" (E *910.0 x X 913.7 IS.) 2' 2ND FLOOR OVERHANG EXISTING /DWELLING 5.9/ (PROPOSED 2ND FLOOR ADDITION / & INTERNAL REMODEL)/ FIRST F,L0pR/ GAFA9E FLOOR ELEV.=916.9 / / / / / / AELEV.= 908.0 1.1'-1ST /FLOOR OVERHANG 5'4.0 qiiNG to 913 X 91 ' x 909.3 EXISTING DWELLING /909 x 908.8 N x 908.7 t`--INSTALL SILT FENCE/810 ROLL 40.5 • . 2.8X • • OS 1O aP • 9, • j_ • 914.0tw • 908.0bw IU, PLANTER CITY OF EDINA APR 12 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMFNT \ I ! • EXIS7ING CURB - - - CUT TO REMAIN H fr V r - INSTALL SILT FENCE/810 ROLL 906.1 O ,-., 0 1\3 '-In DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPEOFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I MI A DULY UCENSED PROFESSION CHEER UNDER THE LAWS CF NE STAR OF MILAN DATE SURVEYED: MARCH 29, 2021 SHEET TITLE SHEET SIZE: 22 X 34 JOE BACKER SURVEYED BY PROPOSED SURVEY & TREE PROTECTION PLAN SHEET NO. ADVANCE SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. 4236 SCOTT TERRACE DRAWING NUMBER S1 17917 Highway No. 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: vuvw.advsur.com 210596 JR 1 INCH = 10 FEET 20' EDINA, MN DATE DRAFTED: APRIL 9, 2021 SHEEt 1 OF 1 0 10' • • UCENSE NO. APRIL 9, 2021 • MI IN DATE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION AREA OF LOT 9,798 SQ. FT. LOT COVERAGE 34.9% LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The South 49 feet of Lot 36, Morningside, Hennepin County, Minnesota. EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE EXISTING HARDCOVER EXISTING DWELLING SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS: 1. Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our services does not include determining what you own, which is a legal matter. Please check the legal description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel, if necessary, to make sure that it is correct and that any matters of record, such as easements, that you wish to be included on the survey have been shown. 2. Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey. 3. Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property. 4. Existing building dimensions and setbacks measured to outside of siding or stucco. 5. Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown before proceeding with - construction. 6. Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give , I some indication of the topography of the site. We have also P4,13 provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations 0 for construction on this site. The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey. Use that benchmark and check at least one other feature shown on the vi 4(8 survey when determining other elevations for use on this site b or before beginning construction. m 7. This survey has been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment. There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed by a current title commitment. Therefore, this survey does not purport to - show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones 909.2x shown hereon. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: " • " Denotes iron survey marker,found, unless otherwise noted. 44.8 X 912.6 911.5 I4. X 913.1 913.4 X 913.7 DECK 910.9 x 912.2 907.5 9103 90'3'6 912.2 X 908.7 g0B- X 907.8 9,8 X 908.8 A ) 199.85 913.6 x91.4 ' 9p FIRST FLOOR ELEV.=916.9 EXISTING GARAGE 909.4J N J912.5 x EXISTING GARAGE N 89'25'29" E / 200.15 / 911.1 910 - N 89'43'29" (E * 910,0 912.6 x ( -913_ 912,5 9/ 540 /, GARAGE F_00R/2 ELEV.=908.0/ _s DRIVEWAY cl 1 BITUMINOUS EXISTING DWELLING CITY OF EDINA APR 1 2 2021 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 40.5 HOUSE DECK DRIVEWAY REAR STOOP FRONT STOOP/WALK SIDE WALK STONE WALLS 1,567 SQ. FT. 761 SQ. FT. 736 SQ. FT. 20 SQ. FT. 137 SQ. FT. 119 SQ. FT. 80 SQ. FT. HOUSE DECK FRONT STOOP DECK CREDIT TOTAL EXISTING BUILDING AREA OF LOT LOT COVERAGE 1,567 SQ. FT. 761 SQ. FT. 59 SQ. FT. -150 SQ. FT. 2,237 SQ. FT. 9,798 SQ. FT. 22.8% TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 3,420 SQ. FT. S Wayne W. Prete7 #43503 LICENSE NO. APRIL 2, 2021 DATE DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWING ORIENTATION & SCALE 0 10' 20' JOE BACKER 4236 SCOTT TERRACE EDINA, MN Advance Surveying & Engineering, Co. 17917 Highway No. 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 Phone (952) 474-7964 Web: www.advsur.com I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SURVEY OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY REGISTERED SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE E TA. DATE SURVEYED: MARCH 29, 2021 DATE DRAFTED: MARCH 31, 2021 SHEET TITLE EXISTING SURVEY SHEET SIZE: 11 X 17 DRAWING NUMBER 210308 WP SHEET NO. S1 SHEET 1 OF 1 CLIENT/JOB ADDRESS Sur vey Responses 30 January 2019 - 07 June 2023 Public Hearing Comments-4236 Scot t Terrace Bet ter Together Edina Project: Public Hearing: 4236 Scott Terrace VISITORS 2 CONTRIBUTORS 1 RESPONSES 1 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous 1 Registered 0 Unverified 0 Anonymous Respondent No:1 Login:Liz Olson Email:lkolson@EdinaMN.gov Responded At:Jun 06, 2023 08:56:46 am Last Seen:Jun 08, 2023 18:14:26 pm IP Address:156.142.13.110 Q1.First and Last Name RANDY GUERTIN Q2.Address 4239 Scott Terrace Q3.Comment I support the variance request that was made on behalf of 4236 Scott Terrace. I said I just wanna let you know that we do support that. Thank you so much. (Voicemail received 6/6/23 at 10:46 AM. Transcribed by City Staff) EdinaMN.gov Variance Request/modification of existing approval 4236 Scott Terrace Site Location 4236 Scott Terrace Existing home Existing survey 2021 Proposed survey 2021 project/variances approved 2021 south elevation 2021 north and east elevations Current proposal Propose survey Front/east elevation South elevation North elevation West elevation/rear yard Compliance table for a new home 2023 and 2021 compliance Recommendation for modification 4236 Scott Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55 i 16 arson Design B Feedback and Support for a Setback Variance for a 2nd Floor Addition to our Home at 4236 Scott Terrace. House # Family Name 4228 Robertson Family 4229 Alden Higgins Family 4229 Hubbard Family Comments: "The Robertson family at 4228 Scott Terr support your project and the requested variance." "Absolutely! We support the variance for the Backer home addition." "The neighbors at 4229 Scott Terrace are 100% in support of this extremely small variance." "Having undertaken a home remodel and in need of a variance (granted) myself, I am 4230 Wirth Family in full support of your variance and will help you (and Tisha) in any way possible. The design plan is beautiful!" 4231 Herrmann/Banks Family "Jason and I completely support your variance request!" 4232 Schumacher Family "We support the proposed design." "We, Clayton and Susan Umlor (neighbors of Joe and Tisha Backer), are in support of 4233 Umlor Family this variance for their upcoming home remodel. We appreciate how they are utilizing the current structure and enhancing their home." 4237 Rohlf Family "We absolutely support you in this! Please let us know if there is anything else we can do to help you with the planning commission." 4238 Wilson Family "Your new design looks nice. Eddie and I are fine with the variance." "As your neighbors across the street at 4239 Scott Terrace, we offer our full support of 4239 Guertin Family your second story addition project as outlined in your blueprints. Thank you for keeping us informed of the details. You are wonderful neighbors, and we are thrilled that you are staying on Scott Terrace!" 4240 Ormber Family "Yes, we support your remodel project." "The Johnson Family at 4242 Scott Ter are in full support of this variance." "We have 4242 Johnson Family lived on Scott Terrace for about 12 years. We have seen many homes upgraded/remodeled and built throughout the years. This variance is absolutely acceptable, and we are in full support" 4243 Wray/Hittle Family Verbal from Betsy Wray that she supports the variance 4244 Dunbar Family "We would be fully supportive of the waiver. Best of luck with the project." Joe Backer From: Harper, Annie <AHarper@hollstadt.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1:30 PM To: Joe Backer Subject: Support of B-23-07 Variance Request for 4236 Scott Terrace [EXTERNAL EMAIL] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Joe, I, Annie Harper, who lives at 4234 Scott Terrace, support our neighbors Joe and Tisha Backer's variance request at 4236 Scott Terrace. Sincerely, Annie Harper Account Manager Hollstadt Consulting 1305 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 310, Eagan, MN 55121 612.417.9823 Direct I aharper@hollstadt.com A Certified Woman-Owned Business Enterprise This e-mail communication is private and confidential. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system without copying or disseminating it. 1 Joe Backer From: Cindy Wilson <cwilson@churchillcompanies.com > Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2023 1:19 PM To: Joe Backer Subject: Support of B-23-07 Variance request for 4236 Scott Terrace [EXTERNAL EMAIL] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We, Eddie and Cindy Wilson, who live at 4238 Scott Terrace, support our neighbors Joe and Tisha Backer???s variance request at 4236 Scott Terrace. ?? Thank you ?? Cynthia J. Wilson 1 Date: June 14, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:2024 P lanning C ommis s ion Work P lan Dis cus s ion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: B egin discussion and preparation of the 2024 P lanning C ommission Work P lan. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft Work Plan - 2024 Page 1 of 3 Planning Commission 2024 Proposed Work Plan 1 Initiative Type: Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): All Commissioners Initiative Title: Land Use Applications Initiative Description: Review land use applications, send recommendations to Council on CUP, site plans, and rezoning. Deliverable: Recommendations on land use applications submitted to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): None required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning Staff & Communications. Liaison Comments: This is the primary responsibility of the Planning Commission City Manager Comments: 2 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Consider the next “Areas of Potential Change” for future small area planning/lead in to the next Comprehensive Plan Update. Initiative Description: Consideration of areas for future small area planning/lead in to the next Comprehensive Plan Update. Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council. These areas would then be studied further in the next Comprehensive Plan update. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. This task should not take a lot of time to complete but will be important to set the stage for the next areas to study as part of the 2028 Comprehensive Plan. Liaison Comments: This task is to simply identify the areas, not study them. City Manager Comments: = commission = staff Page 2 of 3 3 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Cahill District Plan follow up Initiative Description: Review and update industrial zoning district standards to align with Comprehensive Plan and Cahill District Area Plan guidance Deliverable: Potential Zoning Ordinance Amendments Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Yes. Planning Staff will assist. Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: 4 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Parking Initiative Description: Consideration of future of parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. Planning Commission will be the lead. ETC & EEC will review and comment on final report and recommendation from Planning Commission. Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Page 3 of 3 5 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Underutilized paved areas (climate action plan recommendation) Initiative Description: Identify underutilized paved areas and incentivize conversion to sustainable green space or infill development. Conversion focus should take into consideration neighborhood's greenspace, heat island mitigation, affordable housing, and bike/walk mobility needs and prioritize site utilization based on addressing the greatest needs at each site as determined through appropriate engagement with the community, particularly people traditionally under represented. (This is one from the Climate Action Plan) Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Parking Lot