Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-07-26 Planning Commission Regular Meeting PacketAg enda Planning Commission City Of E dina, Minnesota City H all Council Chambers Wednesday, July 26, 2023 7:00 PM Watch the m eeting on cable TV or at EdinaMN.gov/LiveMeeting s or Facebook.com /EdinaMN. How to Participate in Public Hearings: Call 786-496-5601 E nter Confer ence Pin 2407064# Press *1 on your telephone keypad when you would like to g et in the queue to speak An operator will intr oduce you when it is your turn I.Ca ll To Ord er II.Roll Ca ll III.Approva l Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approva l Of Meeting Min u tes A.Draft Minutes of Regu la r Meetin gs on June 28, 2023 V.Com m u n ity Com m ent During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. G enerally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VI.Pu b lic Hea rings A.Prelim ina ry Rezon ing (Ordin ance Am endm en t), Site Pla n a n d Su b d ivision – 5100 E d en Aven u e VII.Rep orts/Recom m en d ation s A.2024 W ork Pla n VIII.Cha ir An d Mem ber Com m ents IX.Sta5 Com m ents X.Adjournm en t The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli8cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: July 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: Minutes F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes of R egular Meetings on June 28, 2023 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the draft minutes from J une 28, 2023. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description 6-28-23 Draft Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 1 of 4 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers June 28, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Bennett called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Bornstein, Miranda, Daye, Padilla, Strauss, Smith, Felt, Hu, and Chair Bennett. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Addison Lewis, Community Development Coordinator, and Liz Olson, Administrative Support Specialist. Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Olson and Gandhi. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Daye moved to approve the June 28, 2023, agenda. Commissioner Felt seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes: Planning Commission, June 14, 2023 Commissioner Felt moved to approve the June 14, 2023, meeting minutes. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. V. Community Comment Ms. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookton Avenue, addressed the Commission regarding the City’s Tree Ordinance. Chair Bennett closed Community Comment at 7:14 PM. VI. Public Hearings A. Cahill District Area Plan City of Edina Community Development Coordinator Addison Lewis presented the Cahill District Area Plan. Staff recommends adoption of the Cahill District Area Plan, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 2 of 4 Appearing for the Applicant Cahill District Area Plan Working Group Chair David Alkire, City of Edina Community Development Coordinator Addison Lewis, and Ms. Haila Maze and Mr. Mike Thompson, Bolton & Menk, made a presentation to the Commission. The applicants answered Commission questions. Public Hearing Mr. Steve Brown, 5528 Halifax Lane, addressed the Commission and indicated he was in favor of the Cahill District Area Plan. Mr. Daniel Eaton, 5712 Parkwood Lane, addressed the Commission and explained he was impressed and in favor of this plan. Commissioner Daye moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission reviewed the Cahill District Area Plan and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. Motion Commissioner Daye moved that the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Cahill District Area Plan and associated Comprehensive Plan amendments and authorize submission to the Metropolitan Council. Additionally, it is recommended that a body of stakeholders from the district be formed to assist with the implementation of the plan.Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried 7-ayes, 1 nay (Miranda). The Commission recessed at 10:00 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 10:05 p.m. B. B-23-10 Variance Request at 4545 77th Street West Community Development Coordinator Lewis presented the request of 4545 77 th Street West for a variance. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. Staff answered Commission questions. Appearing for the Applicant Ms. Amy Bustos and Ms. Missy Wettstrom, Co-owners of Droolin’ Moose, addressed the Commission and answered questions. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing Ms. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Commission and indicated she was in favor of this proposal. Commissioner Padilla moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. The Commission reviewed the variance request and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. Motion Commissioner Bornstein moved that the Planning Commission deny the Variance request at 4545 77th Street West as the proposal does not meet the variance criteria. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion failed. 3 ayes (Smith, Daye, Bornstein) 5 nays (Felt, Miranda, Padilla, Strauss, Bennett). Commissioner Felt moved that the Planning Commission approve the Variance request at 4545 77th Street West as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Padilla seconded the motion. Motion carried. 5 ayes (Felt, Miranda, Padilla, Strauss, Bennett). 3 nays (Smith, Daye, Bornstein) C. Zoning Ordinance Amendment – Multi-Family Housing in the City’s PCD-1 and PCD-2 Zoning Districts Director Teague presented the request of a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Multi-Family Housing in City’s PCD-1 and PCD-2 Zoning Districts. Staff recommends approval of the zoning ordinance amendment, as requested subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. City Attorney Dave Kendall was at the meeting remotely to help with questions. Staff answered Commission questions. Public Hearing Ms. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained this item needs more work before voting on it. Mr. Steve Brown, 5528 Halifax Lane, addressed the Commission and indicated he was not in favor of this. Ms. Barbara Hogenson, 5724 Duncan, addressed the Commission and expressed her concern with this Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: ___, 2023 Page 4 of 4 The Commission reviewed the Zoning Ordinance Amendment for Multi-Family Housing and offered comments that can be reviewed in the official meeting video. Motion Commissioner Bornstein moved that the Planning Commission postpone making a decision on the proposed amendment to section 36-618 and to support re-noticing the proposed amendment 36-618 and the alternative proposed amendment to section 36-612. Commissioner Daye seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. VII. Reports/Recommendations VIII. Chair and Member Comments Received. IX. Staff Comments None. X. Adjournment Commissioner Padilla moved to adjourn the June 28, 2023, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 12:04 AM. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Date: July 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P reliminary R ezoning (O rdinance Amendment), S ite P lan and S ubdivis ion – 5100 Eden Avenue Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the Rezoning, Site P lan and Subdivision subject to the findings and conditions in the staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he O pus G roup is proposing to redevelop 5100 E den Avenue. T he specific proposal is to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to build a seven story 136-unit apartment with retail on part of the first level. Ten percent of the units (14) would be provided for affordable housing of households making no more that 50% of the area median income. T he project would also include 3,364 square feet of commercial/retail use including an out patio for the retail, a small public 3,500 s.f. park along Arcadia. T he building would be constructed to meet the C ity’s S ustainable Buildings P olicy. To accommodate the request, the applicant is requesting the following: A R ezoning from P O D -1, P lanned Office D istrict to P U D, P lanned Unit D evelopment. T he P U D would ensure that the affordable housing is included within the project, and that the S ustainable Buildings P olicy is met. In return for providing affordable housing and a building that meets the S ustainable Buildings P olicy, the applicant is requesting flexibility to the underlying P O D standards including building height, building material, building transparency, first floor ceiling height, building setbacks on all sides, floor area ratio and building coverage. T he P U D rezoni ng i s the tool used by the Ci ty to ensure compli ance wi th the sustai nable bui ldi ng poli cy and ensure affordable housi ng. Site P lan and Subdivision/R eplat. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Review Memo - Engineering Review Memo - Building Official and Fire Mars hal Traffic Study (From the public works site which included the subject property) Traffic update and Parking Study Applicant Narrative - Part 1 Applicant Narrative - Part 2 Proposed Plans 1 of 2 Proposed Plans 2 of 2 Project Renderings Building Materials elevations Comments from Mn Dot Pyramid of Discretion in the Land Use Proces s Site Location, Zoning, Comp. Plan and Transportation Plan Grandview District Trans portation Study Grandview District Development Framework Key Pages Grandview District Framework Better Together Public Hearing Comment Report Sketch Plan Draft PUD Ordinance Staff Pres entation Applicant Pres entation The Opus Group is proposing to redevelop 5100 Eden Avenue. The specific proposal is to tear down the existing 38,000 square foot office building to build a seven story 136-unit apartment with retail on part of the first level. Ten percent of the units (14) would be provided for affordable housing of households making no more that 50% of the area median income. The project would also include 3,364 square feet of commercial/retail use including an out patio for the retail, a small public 3,500 s.f. park along Arcadia. The building would be constructed to meet the City’s Sustainable Buildings Policy. To accommodate the request, the applicant is requesting the following:  A Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The PUD would ensure that the affordable housing is included within the project, and that the Sustainable Buildings Policy is met. In return for providing affordable housing and a building that meets the Sustainable Buildings Policy, the applicant is requesting flexibility to the underlying POD standards including building height, building material, building transparency, first floor ceiling height, building setbacks on all sides, floor area ratio and building coverage. The PUD rezoning is the tool used by the City to ensure compliance with the sustainable building policy and ensure affordable housing.  Site Plan and Subdivision/Replat. The table on the page 8 of this report demonstrates how the proposed new building would comply with the existing POD-1 Standards on the lot. The applicant went through the sketch plan process; based on the feedback received, they have made the following revisions to the plans (See more detail on the revisions within the applicant narrative attached): July 26, 2023 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning (Ordinance Amendment), Site Plan and Subdivision – 5100 Eden Avenue Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2  Increased building setbacks. (Now 10 feet on all sides. At sketch plan the building was as close as 4-5 feet on Arcadia and Eden.)  Reduced the mass of the building by fully burying the parking structure. (First level of parking was above grade at sketch plan.) Building now has active street frontage including walk out units.  Added a commercial space in the northwest corner of the building including a outdoor patio.  Added the “Arcadia art walk” public park in the front of the building.  Expanded the sidewalk network to include sidewalks on the north and east side of the building.  Eliminated the vehicular access off Eden Avenue, and one access off Arcadia.  Added building step backs away from the street.  Enhanced landscaping. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has complete discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Roadway exit ramp; Hilltop Cafe; zoned PCD-2, Planned Commercial District and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Easterly: Highway 100. Southerly: Our Lady of Grace; zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided Public/Semi Public. Westerly: Vacant city owned property (future senior housing, restaurant and park); zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development and guided Mixed-Use Center (20-100 units per acre). Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.36 acres in size and contains an existing office building. Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Center (12-100 units per acre). Zoning: POD-1, Planned Office District Seven Guiding Principles for Development The applicant has responded to the Seven Guiding Principles. (See attached responses.) The project would dedicate public space along Arcadia Avenue, and public sidewalks around all sides of the building; adds residents to the district to enhance the economic vitality in the district; adds retail for a mixed-use project; retail located on the north side to be adjacent to the STAFF REPORT Page 3 potential pedestrian connection across Highway 100; four-sided building; provision for electric vehicle parking with a potential for more in the future. Parking Based on the proposal with 136 residential units and 3,364 square feet of commercial/retail uses 166 parking stalls are required. That includes utilization of the 10% reduction allowances for the provision of long-term bike parking. (90 long term covered bike parking spaces are proposed.) The applicant is proposing 183 spaces within the underground parking garage. Stantec Consulting provided a parking study, which concludes that the proposed development requires 176 parking spaces. Site Circulation/Traffic Vehicular access to the site for the restaurant would be off Arcadia Avenue. Right of way has been dedicated to the City of Edina for the roadway improvements that have taken place adjacent to the site. There is no need for any additional right-of-way to comply with the Grandview Transportation Plan. (See future roadway improvements recommended in the Transportation Plan.) There is already adequate space within the Highway 100 right-of-way to construct the future frontage road. Stantec Consulting also conducted traffic study, reviewing the previous traffic study done for the old public work site across the street, which anticipated the proposed 136-unit residential development. (See attached studies.) The studies conclude that the existing roadway system would support the project. The net trips added to the roadway system by the proposed development would have minimal impact on traffic operations on the surrounding street system. No improvements beyond those already planned and constructed by the City are needed. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 24 overstory trees would be required. The applicant is proposing 37 overstory trees in the boulevards along the perimeter of the site and within the park. (See attached landscape plan.) A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in their review memo. (See attached.) A developer’s agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination primarily brick, glass, with metal accents. (See attached renderings.) The applicant is requesting flexibility through the PUD rezoning on the following provision of the City Code. Per Section 36-579 (3), the following building design is required in the POD Zoning District: 3) Building design and construction. In addition to other restrictions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, construction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Office District shall meet the following standards: a. All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. b. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). c. No building facade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. d. Ground level first floors must have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 20 feet. e. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. The applicant is proposing a 13-14 foot tall first floor. The applicant is further requesting flexibility regarding brick material on the first 60 feet in height, and the 75% transparency requirement. The commercial space would meet the transparency requirement of 75%, but the residential transparency would be 40%. Brick would be located at the building corners to meet the 60-foot requirement, but not else ware. (See attached building materials elevations) Staff would recommend the 60-foot brick material requirement be met but believe the first-floor heights are reasonable as proposed, as well as the transparency proposed for residential use. Mechanical Equipment No mechanical equipment has been shown on the plans. Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Final Plans must include location of mechanical equipment and the means of screening. No ground level mechanical equipment shall be located within the front yard of the development. Signage The signage allowed on the site would correspond to the use. The residential use would be subject to sign regulations in Section 36-1712 planned residential districts; the retail uses would be subject to sign regulations of commercial districts, Section 36-1714, PCD-2 District. This would be written into the PUD Ordinance if approved. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails, or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist, or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing sidewalks along the streets and all around the building. There would be 90 indoor long-term bicycle parking stalls within the building next to the fitness area on level 2. Provision of code compliant exterior bike racks for the commercial use near the building entrance would be required at the time of permitting. See the attached memo from engineering regarding the city’s Living Streets Policy. Some of the highlights and recommendations include:  Design the sidewalks to meet ADA requirements.  Public sidewalk to be a minimum 8 feet in width with a 5-foot boulevard. STAFF REPORT Page 6  Coordinate design and installation of a pedestrian crossing treatment along Arcadia Avenue across the TH100 off ramp and median island with MnDOT and City.  Provide a Tier 1 TDM plan as required by the City’s Travel Demand Management Policy. Preliminary/Final Plat The subject site is made up of seven small parcels all held in common ownership. The proposal is to simply combine all the lots in to one lot. Planned Unit Development (PUD) An argument can be made for and against the proposed development. As mentioned, this is a proposal in which the City has complete discretion to approve or deny. The recommendation section of this report will outline a case both for and against this proposed project. Staff believes the proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most of the criteria below would be met. Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; The site is located adjacent to a freeway an arterial, and a collector roadway. There is right-of-way on all four sides of the site. The closest single-family home is over 800 feet away on the other side of Highway 100. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center,” which allows for residential, retail, and public space. By introducing more residential uses in this primarily retail area would enhance and vitalize the existing businesses, increase pedestrian movement in the area, and increase the number of transit users. b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; STAFF REPORT Page 7 The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing on the site. There would be no surface parking on the site, pedestrian movement around the site would be made safer with boulevard style sidewalks and an alternative route around the building on the east and west side. As mentioned, adding more residents in the area could enhance the economic viability in the district. c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; Variations to land use regulations are requested to offset the costs for the provision of city goals including the provision of affordable housing, building a sustainable building (per the City’s policy) well beyond the requirements of the building code, and providing underground parking (no surface parking included). Additional items included in the plans from the list above includes enhanced landscaping, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, podium height on Arcadia and provision of a public park. d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; The proposed building would be high-quality brick, architectural cladding, glass, and metal panel accents. The building would be constructed to meet the Sustainable Buildings Policy which increases the quality of the design. Staff would, however, recommend as a condition of approval that the first 60 feet in elevation of the building be made of brick to meet the City Code requirement for building materials. e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; The project would maintain the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; The existing site is primarily paved parking with the office building. There are a handful of trees that would be removed, but replaced with more, and higher quality trees, including boulevard trees to enhance the pedestrian experience. g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; The project provides a mixture of uses on the site, including housing, retail, and park. h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and STAFF REPORT Page 8 As mentioned, the project would provide 10% of the units for affordable housing to help the City achieve its affordable housing goals. i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. As mentioned, this site is located adjacent to roadways on all sides including Highway 100, an off ramp, and a collector roadway. This site begins the transition into the commercial node. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as Mixed-Use Center. Uses contemplated within that area include: Primary uses are retail, office, service, multifamily residential and institutional uses. The Comprehensive Plan also encourages mixed-use development. Through the PUD rezoning, the multi-family housing would become a permitted use. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed-Use Center; the proposal includes mixed uses with residential and retail. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed land uses include a mixture of uses retail and multi-family residential within the building. STAFF REPORT Page 9 iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities allowed would be specifically stated in the PUD Ordinance. The density proposed is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The density is at the maximum. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on the following page shows how the proposed new building would comply with the POD Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in a new PUD-25 District. Please note that several of the city standards are not met under conventional zoning. However, by relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The site layout would be improved by improving pedestrian movement around the site, providing front door entries on all sides. The design of the buildings is of a high-quality with large windows, and a four-sided builidng. The project would be required to meet the City’s sustainable buildings policy and the affordable housing policy. Additional public realm is proposed with the “art park” on Arcadia. The development would incorporate improved landscaping and green space, elimination of surface parking, and an underground infiltration area. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Compliance Table City Standard (POD) Comp. Plan Proposed (Measured to lot line) Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – North Rear – East 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 10 feet* (45 feet to curb) 10 feet* & 34 feet 10 feet* 12 feet* Density 20-100 units/acre 100 units per acre Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories & 82 feet* Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30% .50% 68%* 3.2%* Parking Stalls – Residential Residential – 1.25 spaces per unit = 170 spaces Retail – 1 space per 250 s.f. = 13 spaces (10% reduction due to 90 indoor bike stalls) Total Required = 166 spaces (includes the 10% reduction for providing 90 long-term enclosed bike parking) 183 spaces First floor building height 20 feet 13-14 feet* Proximity to R-1 District 4 times building height – 328 feet 830 feet First floor transparency and building material Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Per the plans. Brick 60 feet tall on corners and base* 75% Commercial and 40% residential* *Requires flexibility through a PUD Ordinance STAFF REPORT Page 11 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues  Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Yes. Staff does support the revised rezoning of the site, and believes the PUD criteria is met for the following reasons: 1. The proposed project would meet the City’s sustainable buildings policy, which would require the building to exceed typical building code requirements. 2. The project would provide 10% of the units (14 units) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. These units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. 3. The project improves pedestrian movement around and through the site. 4. The project provides additional public realm in the area with the public park along Arcadia Avenue. 5. The commercial area provides and outdoor patio to activate the street along with the public park. 6. Parking would be hidden underneath the building. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, and meet the City’s sustainable building policy, the additional height and density is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the additional costs. The proposed height of the building would not exceed the height of the Jerry’s office building, which has been seen as the maximum height benchmark in the Grandview District. This site is located adjacent to roadways on all sides including Highway 100, an off ramp, and a collector roadway. This site begins the transition into the commercial node. 8. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. 9. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center,” which allows for residential, and retail uses as proposed. 10. The proposed project would meet the following additional goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: STAFF REPORT Page 12 a. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. b. Encourage successful mixed-use development. c. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. d. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. e. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. f. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” g. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” h. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. STAFF REPORT Page 13 i. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” Staff Recommendation Options for Consideration & Recommendation A case can be made for approval and denial of this project. Below are options for the planning commission and city council to consider for denial and approval: Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Site Plan, Subdivision and Preliminary Rezoning of the site from POD-1, Planned Office District-1 to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Denial is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed height and density are not reasonable for the site to justify a PUD. The maximum height for the property is four stories and 48 feet and the density is at the maximum end allowed within the area. 2. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The requested flexibility from the underlying City Code provisions is too much in this instance to justify a PUD. The flexibility requested through the PUD regarding building material, building height, building coverage, floor area ratio, density, and setbacks are not reasonable for this site. The proposal does not meet the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; STAFF REPORT Page 14 f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. 3. The proposed plan does not follow the Grandview District Development Framework. 4. The proposed project does not adequately address the Seven Guiding Principles of the Grandview District. Approval Recommend the City Council approve the request for Preliminary Site Plan, Subdivision and Preliminary Rezoning of the site from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The PUD would ensure that the affordable housing is included within the project, and the building would meet the sustainability policy. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land uses, and density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the existing Zoning on the site. 2. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. c. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street. d. Project is of high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. e. Maintains the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. Provides a mixture of land uses within the development. g. Project would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. 3. The PUD would ensure that the development proposed would be the only building that would be allowed on the site unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. STAFF REPORT Page 15 4. The PUD would ensure 10% of the units within the building would be for affordable housing. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. The 14 affordable housing units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. b. A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern present in much of the city will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. i. Provide visual screening and privacy to buffer cars from people, provide visual relief and allow stormwater infiltration in parking lots. ii. Evaluate current parking standards in order to encourage shared parking and minimize the visual impact of surface parking. iii. Landscaping is essential to screen parking areas, buffer adjacent residential uses and create a pedestrian-friendly environment along streets. c. Encourage successful mixed-use development. d. Create and maintain housing options that serve a diverse range of ages, household types, and economic situations. e. Ensure that public realm design respects community character, supports of commercial and mixed-use development, promotes community identity, and creates high quality experiences for pedestrians, cyclists, transit users, and motorists. f. Multifamily. This land use is defined by the multiple unit building type where each individual unit does not have direct ground floor access to the exterior. Multifamily developments are concentrated primarily along the main traffic arteries and are generally located toward the edges of the city, often in proximity to retail business establishments. Concentrations of multifamily developments are found along York Avenue, France Avenue, Vernon Avenue, Lincoln Drive, and Cahill Road. g. Per the Mixed-Use Land Use Description: “Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, and institutional uses. Vertical mixed-use should be encouraged and may be required on larger sites.” h. “Mixed-use development allows for a savings in time and convenience for residents who choose to live in closer proximity to where they work and shop. Community interest is served by this type of development, as the city is able to integrate additional residences and businesses more efficiently within existing city infrastructure. Pedestrian amenities and proximity of uses encourage more trips to be made by foot or bike, reducing the increase of congestion that can otherwise result from conventional development of separated land uses.” STAFF REPORT Page 16 i. “Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. • Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. • Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. j. “Support the development of mixed-use districts that provide a variety of living opportunities within a walkable and livable area.” 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Stantec Consulting conducted a traffic and parking impact study and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, the additional height is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the cost of the affordable housing units and to build the building to meet the City’s sustainability policy. 8. The proposed uses and site plan would be an upgrade to the current development on the site. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated June 23, 2023. Final Plans should demonstrate compliance with the City Code requirement that the first 60 feet in height of the building be constructed with stone or brick. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 4. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. STAFF REPORT Page 17 7. The project must conform to the City’s affordable housing policy. The project shall provide 10% of the units (14 unit) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. 8. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated July 19, 2023. 9. Compliance with the Stantec Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 10. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment approving the PUD, Planned Unit Development for this site. 11. Dedication of public access easements on the sidewalks and public park on Arcadia Avenue. 12. Compliance with all the conditions outlined in the fire marshal and building official’s memo dated July, 20, 2023. 13. Submittal of a construction management plan subject to review and approval of city staff prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan must demonstrate minimal impact to pedestrian and vehicle movement. 14. Hours of construction must be consistent with City Code. 15. Maintenance of sidewalks and public space shall be responsibility of property owner. 16. Provision of code compliant exterior bike racks for the commercial use near the building entrance would be required at the time of permitting. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the request subject to the findings and conditions listed above. Deadline for a City decision: October 3, 2023 DATE: 7/19/2023 TO: 5100 Eden Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Ross Bintner, PE, Engineering Services Manager RE: 5100 Eden Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, flood risk, and storm water. Plans reviewed included grading and utility drawings dated 6/22/23. Review Comment Required For General 1. Existing easements held by the City require Council action to vacate if deemed appropriate and necessary for the project. Consideration of requests can require up to 60-days to process. General Comment 2. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance of sidewalks along all sides except Eden Avenue adjacent to the street will be the responsibility of the property owner. General Comment 4. This project must meet Edina’s Sustainable Buildings Policy. General Comment Survey 5. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 5.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit 5.2 Public access and/or maintenance easements will be required on all sidewalks. Easement language will be determined by who maintains the specific sidewalk. Certificate of Occupancy Living Streets 6. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 7. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 8. Public sidewalk to be minimum 8’ in width with a 5’ boulevard. Grading/Building Permit 9. Coordinate design and installation of a pedestrian crossing treatment along Arcadia Avenue across the TH100 off ramp and median island with MnDOT and City. Traffic and Street 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Provide traffic study and implement City-approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 12. Staff recommends reducing parking requirements by 10% (166 stalls) for providing covered and long-term bicycle parking per Section 36-1324 of City Code. This project does not qualify for an additional 10% reduction for transit proximity as the closest route (46) does not operate on all days of the week. Grading/Building Permit 13. Provide a Tier 1 TDM plan as required by the City’s Travel Demand Management Policy. Certificate of Occupancy 14. Driveway Entrance permit required for entrance reconstruction. Building Permit 15. Arcadia Ave was constructed in 1970. Street repairs shall conform to standard plates 543. Eden Ave is concrete and shall be repaired per standard plate 545. Street repairs in the roundabout extents shall conform to 541. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 16. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 17. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 18. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 19. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Public Works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 19.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 19.2 Public Works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 20. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 21. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the City to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 22. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection. Grading/Building Permit 23. Watermain installed 1955. Site was developed as early as 1940. A private well may be located on site. Wells not in use must be sealed by a licensed well contractor per MN Rules, Chapter 4725. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 24. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 25. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 26. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 27. Rework existing storm stub and manhole to bring to grade, or remove and abandon if not needed Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 28. A SWPPP consistent with the State General Construction Site Stormwater Permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 29. Construction staging, contractor parking, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit 30. Retaining walls over 4-ft in height require design by a structural engineer. Grading/Building Permit 31. Developer required to remove, salvage and delivery large block retaining to the city. Developer to delivery at a location deemed appropriate by the City. Delivery location will be within the City limits. Certificate of Occupancy Other Agency Coordination 32. MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 33. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 34. Any proposed improvements within the TH100 ROW near the off ramp along the north side of the property shall be coordinated with MnDOT to determine if it will be allowed or not. Grading/Building Permit July 20, 2023 Cary Teague, Community Development Director Nate Borwege, Chief Building Official & Dave Ehmiller, Fire Marshal ADDRESS NEEDED – Proposed Eden 100, 136-Unit New Apartment Building Information / Background: New seven-story apartment building with 136-units and underground parking. - This would be an S-1 parking and R-2 residential apartment building using the 2020 Minnesota State Building Code & Fire Code and adopted appendices. - Provide a complete Building/ Fire Code analysis with plans when submitting for the building permit. - An NFPA 13 Fire Sprinkler System is required. - Provide Ordinary Hazard Group 2 sprinkler coverage in parking areas where EV charging is present. - Buildings two (2) or more stories in height shall be provided with shut-off valves and water-flow devices for each floor. - A permanent map is to be located at the FAAP and main sprinkler riser. The map shall show the location of control valves and drains for each sprinkler zone. - All Fire Department Connections must be no more than 100 feet from an accessible fire hydrant and within 50 feet of the main entrance; be fully visible and immediately accessible by fire personnel (placement subject to approval by AHJ) - Fire department access roads are to be installed and maintained per 2020 MSFC or per AHJ approval. - Ensure adequate Emergency Responder Radio Coverage per policy number SP-022-F2. - See Fire Permits and Policies page on the city website for additional information. (https://www.edinamn.gov/717/Fire-Permits-Policies) - Verify there is adequate assessable parking. This has been an issue in some of the older buildings. - Verify noise ordinance will be complied with and that it’s understood. - Working Hours: Monday – Friday 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. Saturdays – 9A.M. to 5 P.M. Sundays and Holidays – No Work Allowed - Verify Address prior to submitting application for the building permit. - 30, 60, 90 percent meeting required with staff prior to submitting application for building permit. Grandview Yard Traffic Study Edina, Minnesota EDINA EDINA 168382 | August 2022 GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ES-1 Executive Summary Background & Purpose The City of Edina requested a traffic study be completed for the proposed Grandview Yard development at 5146 Eden Avenue (old Public Works site). The 3.125-acre parcel is located on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue in the City of Edina, Minnesota. The development proposes a 90-unit senior cooperative housing (co-op), a 2-story 13,500 SF dine-in restaurant, and a 0.73-acre green space/public plaza. See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. The existing transportation conditions for the area include the following near-term planned improvements: · Eden Avenue/SB TH 100 Ramp Removal · Eden Avenue at Arcadia Mini-Roundabout · Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Eden Avenue at Willson Road Mini-Roundabouts · Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Bridge Reconstruction, a Hennepin County project, includes pedestrian improvements, a dedicated westbound left-turn land, improved signal timings, and the removal of the southbound free-right turn movement at the TH 100 SB ramp and signal retimings. As part of the no build traffic, the study confirmed the land use sizes and included the estimated trip generation for the planned redevelopments at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). The purposes of the traffic study include a parking demand review for the Grandview Yard development and an analysis of the No Build operations and Build operations associated with the proposed development and the impacts expected on the surrounding roadway network and study intersections. Traffic Study Conclusion Summary: · The parking needs for the Senior Housing development are met per City code and ITE Parking Generation Manual. · The parking needs for the Restaurant development are met per the City code and ITE Parking Generation Manual. This based on the results from the Grandview Parking Ramp study, which concluded adequate capacity in the public parking garage to accommodate additional parking demand in the area. · The proposed Grandview Yard development is expected to generate 1,424 weekday daily new trips, 28 AM peak hour new trips, and 128 PM peak hour new trips. · No Build operations were not significantly impacted by the new trips due to the relatively small number of new trips distributed to each intersection during the peak hours within the Grandview network. · The planned mini-roundabouts along Eden Avenue at Arcadia, Grange, and Willson are all expected to perform well (intersection LOS A) with the 2024 and 2042 Build volumes. · Traffic operations for the 2024 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C and no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. Some queueing concerns exist during the peak hours for the EB and WB approaches at the Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB Ramp and for EB and SB movements at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. Executive Summary (continued) GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ES-2 · Traffic operations for the 2042 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. LOS E is expected for the northbound approach at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour with maximum queue lengths extending past the adjacent driveways on Arcadia Ave. Similar queueing concerns as the 2024 No Build scenario are experienced at other study intersections. · Traffic operations for the 2024 Build scenario are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions. LOS D is experienced for the northbound movement in the AM peak hour at the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection. · Traffic operations for the 2042 Build scenario are comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions. Some movements, however, experienced increased delay: LOS E for NB and SB approaches at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd, LOS E for NB right-turn at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave in AM peak hour, and LOS E for the WB approach at Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramp. Recommendations summary: · It is recommended that the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection be monitored in the future to understand if there are any future operations or queueing concerns that should be addressed once development changes occur and as general background traffic volumes increase. · Signal timing adjustments and coordination along Vernon Avenue may be necessary to accommodate background traffic demand in addition to new development traffic. Specifically monitor signal timings at the Vernon Ave/SB TH 100 interchange ramp and Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. · Consider spacing the two proposed driveways on Arcadia Avenue further apart to avoid turning conflicts or driver confusion. · Encourage public parking in the parking ramp for the restaurant to double trips onto the roadway network. · Monitor valet parking activity and circulation to mitigate safety issues on Arcadia Ave during peak periods. SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 i Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Relevant Studies and Policies ................................................................ 1 2 Existing Conditions ..................................................... 3 3 Planned Development ................................................ 9 4 Parking Demand Review ............................................ 9 5 Traffic Forecasting ................................................... 11 5.1 Background Forecasting ....................................................................... 11 5.2 Trip Generation – 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) ........................... 11 5.3 Trip Generation – Surrounding Developments ..................................... 12 5.4 Trip Distribution .................................................................................... 14 6 Traffic Operations Analysis ...................................... 15 6.1 Intersection Analysis ............................................................................. 16 6.2 Travel Demand Management Policy Review ........................................ 22 7 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................ 23 List of Tables Table 1 – Trip Generation for 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) ............................. 12 Table 2 – Trip Generation for 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) ......................... 13 Table 3 – Trip Generation for 4917 Eden Ave (Old Perkins Restaurant).................. 13 Table 4 – Level of Service Thresholds ..................................................................... 15 Table 5 – 2024 No Build Operations Summary ........................................................ 17 Table 6 – 2042 No Build Operations Summary ........................................................ 18 Table 7 – 2024 Build Operations Summary .............................................................. 20 Table 8 – 2042 Build Operations Summary .............................................................. 21 List of Figures Figure 1 – Project Location ........................................................................................ 2 Figure 2 – Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) ..................................................... 4 Figure 3 – Eden Avenue & Arcadia Mini Roundabout Concept ................................. 5 Contents (continued) GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 ii Figure 4 – Mini Roundabouts Concept on Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road ..................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5 – Existing Conditions .................................................................................... 8 List of Appendices Appendix A Grandview Yard Concept Plan Appendix B Intersection Volume Figures Appendix C Traffic Operational Results GRANDVIEW YARD TRAFFIC STUDY EDINA 168382 Page 1 Grandview Yard Traffic Study Prepared for Edina, Minnesota 1 Introduction 1.1 Background This traffic study was conducted to focus on the traffic impacts due to the proposed development at 5146 Eden Avenue, located on an approximately 3.125-acre parcel on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue in the City of Edina. This site is also known as the former public works site for the city and currently sits vacant. Over the past several years, the City has developed a framework for revitalizing the Grandview District, and this development looks to meet the guiding principles and vision set for the district while also supporting other planned projects in the district. See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. The proposed full build out of the 5146 Eden Ave site includes: · 90-unit senior housing cooperative project, including 173 underground parking spaces · 2-story 13,500 square-foot, 347 seat restaurant, including 32 surface parking stalls and use of public parking ramp · 31,643 square-foot green space/public plaza, with connection to future pedestrian bridge (currently under construction) This study also confirmed the land use sizes for the redevelopments occurring at 5100 Eden Avenue and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site) and included the trip generation in the no build traffic conditions for this study. · 5100 Eden Ave: 138 housing units · 4917 Eden Ave: 196 housing units and 3,700 square-foot restaurant 1.2 Relevant Studies and Policies The project area has been studied several times in recent years. Some studies were conducted to develop Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for redevelopment parcels, while other studies included local roadway and intersection improvements and high-level planning concepts. The following studies and policies were primarily used by either incorporating the data or as a reference: · Parking Study Update for Grandview Parking Ramp (2022) · East Grandview Transportation Study (2021) · Travel Demand Management Policy (2021) · Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue (2021) · Eden Avenue Traffic Study (2020) · Grandview District Transportation Study (2016) · Grandview District Development Framework (2012) SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 2 Figure 1 – Project Location SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 3 2 Existing Conditions The following is a description of each of the major roadways and intersections within the project area. The bold/italicized text discusses planned roadway improvements that are currently in the design or planning phase and are assumed to be considered “No Build” conditions for the purposes of this study. Highway 100 TH 100 is a north-south freeway facility that extends over 15-miles through the western side of the metro area. Through the interchange, TH 100 has 3-travel lanes in each direction, with a posted speed limit of 60 miles per hour (MPH) and carries approximately 124,000 vehicles per day. Northbound TH 100 has a single low speed (20 MPH) exit ramp that connects to Grange Road. There are two entrance ramps from W. 50th Street to northbound TH 100 with an eastbound loop ramp and a westbound right turn. Southbound TH 100 has a single lane exit to access Vernon Avenue to the west and 50th Street to the east, a connection to a collector-distributer (CD) roadway system also allows access to Arcadia Avenue. There is a single entrance ramp connection to southbound TH 100 that is part of the CD roadway with access from Vernon Avenue. Planned Improvements: Eden Ave/SB TH 100 Ramp Removal The southbound TH 100 on-ramp from Eden Avenue is planned for removal by 2024, and was not included as part of the project year of opening roadway conditions for this study. Vernon Avenue S Vernon Avenue S is a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway designated as a County State Aid Highway 158 (CSAH 158) for Hennepin County. It is a 4-lane divided roadway that serves as a primary regional corridor, connecting drivers to TH 62, TH 100, residential areas, and commercial areas such as the Grandview District. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Sidewalk facilities exist primarily on the north side of Vernon Avenue S within the focus area. Vernon Avenue S transitions into W 50th Street on the east side of TH 100. Access to both directions of TH 100 is provided from Vernon Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 12,400 to 19,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: Vernon Ave Bridge Reconstruction Hennepin County is currently in the design phase to reconstruct the Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) bridge over the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The project includes intersection improvements and modifications to the three adjacent intersections of Interlachen Boulevard, Arcadia Avenue, and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal. The project is anticipated to begin construction in 2023 and completed in 2024. The following improvements are included in the project area: · Pedestrian Improvements throughout the project area, including: - Widening sidewalks on railroad bridge. - ADA pedestrian ramps at all crossings and new sidewalk connections. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 4 - Improved crossings at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 SB Ramp. · Interlachen Boulevard Intersection: - Adding a westbound left turn lane and signal phase. · TH 100 SB Ramp Terminal Intersection: - Remove southbound free right turn movement and realign to the traffic signal. Figure 2 – Vernon Avenue Reconstruction (2024) W 50th Street W 50th Street and Vernon Avenue S are a common roadway, with Vernon Avenue S designated to the west of TH 100 and W 50th Street designated to the east of TH 100. Like Vernon Avenue S, W 50th Street is also a west-east A-Minor Arterial roadway within the study area. It is a 4-lane roadway that also serves as a regional corridor in the City. The posted speed limit is 30 MPH. Near the TH 100 overpass, sidewalk facilities exist only on the north side of the roadway. Sidewalk facilities are provided on both sides of the roadway east of Grange Road. In the study area, the corridor carries between 19,000 to 27,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Eden Avenue Eden Avenue is a west-east Minor Collector roadway designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina. It is a 3-lane undivided roadway that connects between Vernon Avenue to the west and W 50th Street to the east with a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour (MPH). Sidewalk facilities exist on both sides of the roadway except a short segment with sidewalk only on the south side between Brookside Avenue and Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd; this missing segment will be constructed with a planned 2021 project. Access to southbound TH SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 5 100 is provided from Eden Avenue. In the study area, the corridor carries between 3,600 to 5,200 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: · TH 100 ramp removal; after Hennepin County Vernon Avenue project (2024). · Eden Ave & Arcadia Mini-Roundabout (2022) The Eden Avenue Traffic Study (2020) completed for the City included the recommendations for improvements along Eden Avenue at both Arcadia Avenue and the TH 100 Southbound ramp terminal intersections. The intersection of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue will be converted from an all-way stop controlled intersection to a mini-roundabout controlled intersection to improve safety and operations. The construction of the roundabout is anticipated in 2022. The analysis showed the current Eden Avenue entrance ramp to southbound TH 100 could be removed without significant impacts to the roadway network. Rerouted traffic to the Vernon Avenue ramp intersection added delays but did not create a considerable impact. The ramp removal reduces the volumes along Eden Avenue and reduces access. The ramp removal is anticipated to be removed in 2024. Figure 3 – Eden Avenue & Arcadia Mini Roundabout Concept Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road Arcadia Avenue and Normandale Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Arcadia Avenue connects between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, while Normandale Road extends to the south as a western freeway frontage road. Due to the proximity to the Our Lady of Grace Catholic School (OLG), Normandale Road is also within a 20 MPH school speed zone. Arcadia SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 6 Avenue carries approximately 1,100 vehicles per day and Normandale Road carries approximately 2,100 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Most of the new traffic from the development will utilize Arcadia Road to access the Grandview Yard site. Grange Road and Willson Road Grange Road and Willson Road are two local minor collector roadways included in the study area; both facilities are 2-lane undivided roadways with speed limits of 30 MPH. Grange Road connects between W 50th Street and Eden Avenue, while Willson Road extends to the south as an eastern freeway frontage road. Willson Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) Route for the City of Edina and carries approximately 4,400 vehicles per day. Grange Road carries between 6,000 and 8,000 vehicles per day based on the most recent daily traffic numbers. Planned Improvements: Two mini roundabouts along Eden Avenue Based on the alternatives analysis completed in the East Grandview Transportation Study (2021), the intersection of Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road is programmed for improvements related to the redevelopment in the area and possible TIF funds. The existing all- way stop controlled intersection is skewed and has a large footprint that adds to driver confusion. The planned improvement project includes two mini roundabouts closely spaced together Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road. The design realigns Willson Road to connect directly across from the southern City Hall parking lot access, and Grange Road would be constructed as a separate T-intersection. Reference the East Grandview Transportation Study for a comprehensive traffic analysis of this configuration. Figure 4 – Mini Roundabouts Concept on Eden Avenue at Grange Road and Willson Road SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 7 The following is a comprehensive list of all thirteen (16) intersections included in the full traffic analysis area; the main study intersections are also noted. 1. Vernon Ave/Gus Young Ln/Retail Access(1) Minor Stop Control 2. Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd(1) Traffic Signal(3) 3. Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave(1) Eastbound RIRO(2) 4. Vernon Ave at TH 100 SB Ramp(1) Traffic Signal(3) 5. Vernon Ave at TH 100 NB Ramp(1) Free Movements 6. W 50th Street at Eden Ave Minor Stop Control 7. Arcadia Ave at TH 100 SB Ramp connection Minor Stop Control 8. Arcadia Ave at Eden 100 Driveway/Proposed Restaurant Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 9. Arcadia Ave at Proposed Senior Living Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 10. Grange Road at TH 100 NB Ramp Minor Stop Control 11. Vernon Ave at Eden Ave(1) Traffic Signal 12. Vernon Ave at Brookside Ave Minor Stop Control 13. Eden Ave at School/Church/Proposed Senior Living Driveway(1) Minor Stop Control 14. Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd(1) Mini Roundabout(3) 15. Eden Ave at Grange Rd Mini Roundabout(3) 16. Eden Ave at Willson Rd Mini Roundabout(3) Notes: (1) Main Study Intersections (2) Right-In/Right-Out Intersection (3) Planned Improvements included in No Build scenario Figure 5 summarizes the no build 2024 traffic control at the study area intersections. Additional intersection figures can be found in Appendix B. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 8 Figure 5 – Existing Conditions SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 9 Vehicle Volumes To perform the operational analyses, the City provided vehicle turning movement data from recently completed studies within the study area, in addition to MnDOT count data and MnDOT ramp detector volume data. No new traffic data or observations were performed as part of this study. The East Grandview Transportation Study’s volume database from the Build scenario that included the existing and short-term planned transportation improvements were used as the no build 2024 volumes in this study. The foundation for most of this data included counts collected in 2019 and 2021 within the study area to ensure that most recent development traffic, such as the Avidor apartment complex, was included as much as possible in the analysis. Earlier turning movement count data was used, when necessary, for balancing purposes. With the study area having been thoroughly reviewed in recent years, an existing conditions analysis was not conducted. The study analyzed the anticipated year of opening 2024 traffic volumes, which will be discussed in the next section. 3 Planned Development The focus of this study is the planned development for the Grandview Yard area located at 5146 Eden Avenue, which is the location of the former public works site. The proposed full build out of the site includes: · 90-unit senior housing cooperative project, including 173 underground parking spaces · 2-story 13,500 square-foot, 347 seat restaurant, including 32 surface parking stalls and use of public parking ramp · 31,643 square-foot green space/public plaza, with connection to future pedestrian bridge (currently under construction) See Appendix A for a concept of the proposed Grandview Yard development. This study also included the confirmed land use sizes for the developments occurring at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 Building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins site). Previous traffic studies have been completed in the Grandview area that included some differences in the number of proposed units and/or square footage. This analysis made the updates and revised the analysis appropriately – and ultimately, these differences made a nominal impact in the review. · 5100 Eden Ave: 138 housing units · 4917 Eden Ave: 196 housing units and 3,700 square-foot restaurant Trip generation traffic was added to the forecasted background traffic volumes for both the 2024 and 2042 forecast years. 4 Parking Demand Review Another component to this traffic study was to complete a parking demand review for the proposed Grandview Yard development. Parking requirements were reviewed using both City Code of Ordinances parking requirements and the ITE’s Parking Generation Manual. The SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 10 calculated parking demands were then compared to the planned parking stall layouts for the land uses to understand if the parking supply meets the expected demand during the peak period(s). Overall, the planned parking for Grandview Yard, which includes the spaces available in the nearby public parking ramp, will provide adequate number of spaces to accommodate the parking demands for the 347-seat restaurant and the 90-unit senior living co-op. There are no parking demands necessary for the proposed green space. Division 3, Subdivision II, Section 36-1311 of the City Code states: (c) Senior citizen dwelling unit buildings in the PSR-4 and PSR-5 subdistricts. (1) 0.5 exposed spaces and 0.25 enclosed spaces per senior citizen dwelling unit1. (2) In addition to subsection (c)(1) of this section, the following spaces are required: a. One completely enclosed and one exposed space for each nonsenior citizen dwelling unit located in a building in the Planned Senior Residence District; b. One completely enclosed space per vehicle owned by the building's management and stored on the property; and c. One exposed space for each employee who is not a resident of the building. (d) Restaurants (except within shopping centers). Spaces equal in number to one-third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the major shift. Notes: 1 For this review, the City allowed enclosed spaces to replace the number of required exposed parking spaces for senior citizen housing. Senior Housing The proposed senior housing co-op will include a total of 90-units and 3 employees. The site includes an underground parking garage with 173 spaces. It is expected that these spaces will be used by residents, staff, and visitors of the complex. There are a small number (<10) of exposed parking spaces proposed for the site. The City Code requires a total of 71 parking spaces and the ITE Parking Generation Manual (ITE Code 252, Senior Adult Housing-Multifamily) requires a total of 55 spaces. Therefore, the parking needs for this development are met per the City Code and ITE. Restaurant The proposed restaurant will be approximately 13,400 SF, include 347 seats, and will staff approximately 50 employees during a peak shift. The site includes 32 surface parking spaces. The development expects that all staff members will utilize the public parking garage. Once the parking lot is full, patrons will either utilize the public parking garage or use the valet service (which will park near or in the public parking garage). The City Code requires a total of 166 parking spaces (115 spaces for patrons + 50 spaces for employees) and the ITE Parking Generation Manual (ITE Code 931, Quality Restaurant) requires a total of 180 spaces. Assuming SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 11 that all of the employees will utilize the public parking garage and patrons will utilize the public parking garage once the surface lot is full, a total of 134 parking spaces will be required during the peak period from the existing parking ramp. A Parking Study Update for Grandview Parking Ramp was recently completed in May 2022 for the public parking ramp and was referenced as part of this review. The study reviewed and summarized the existing parking ramp usage during the weekday and weekend late afternoon and evening time periods. The parking ramp has a total of 273 parking spaces, with 210 regular spaces and 63 3-hour restricted parking spaces. During the analysis periods, an average occupancy of 21.25% (215 unused spaces) was observed for the entire parking ramp during the weekday evening periods and an average occupancy of 21.0% (216 unused spaces) was observed for the entire parking ramp during the weekend late afternoon periods. Overall, these results conclude that a significant number of parking spaces are available during the late afternoon and evening time periods throughout the week. Based on the Grandview Parking Ramp study, there is an average of approximately 215 unused spaces in the parking garage during the weekday and weekend afternoon or early evening peak periods. Since these unused spaces exceed the required 134 parking garage spaces for the restaurant, the parking demands are met per the City Code and ITE. 5 Traffic Forecasting 5.1 Background Forecasting Future traffic forecasts were developed based on the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Plan and previous studies in the project area. Most roadways within the project area have a growth rate of between 0.2% and 0.5%. Based on the low growth rate and previous projects, including the East Grandview Transportation Study and the Eden Avenue Traffic Study, a growth rate of 0.3% per year was applied to all intersections in the study area. This growth rate was used to forecast the background traffic to the 2024 and 2042 future years. Intersection volume figures can be found in Appendix B. 5.2 Trip Generation – 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) A trip generation analysis was performed for the Grandview Yard development site based on the average rates provided in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. The existing lot is currently vacant, and the proposed development includes a senior housing co-op, a dine-in restaurant, and a green space/public plaza. The land uses that were used for estimating the new trips include Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily (ITE Code 252) and Fine Dining Restaurant (ITE Code 931). All the trips are assumed to be new trips to the area. The Grandview Yard development also includes an approximately 0.73-acre green space. Due to the small area, there are no additional trips expected to be generated for the green space. It is assumed that trips to the park will be either be multi-use trips to other businesses in the area or will be accessed by a non-motor vehicle mode of transportation (i.e. walking, bicycling, or rolling). Due to the nature of these land uses and as a conservative approach, there were no pass-by trips or multi-use trip reductions applied to the trip generation estimates. The previously completed East Grandview District traffic study assumed that the land use at 5146 Eden Avenue was to include 165 residential apartment units. Using the previous 10th Edition for ITE Trip Generation Manual and the previous land use size assumption, the trip generation rates SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 12 estimated a total of 898 daily new trips, 59 AM peak hour new trips, and 73 PM peak hour new trips. Therefore, with this updated study, a total of 526 daily trips were added, 31 AM peak hour trips were removed, and 55 PM peak hour trips were added to the network compared to the previous East Grandview District study. Table 1 summarizes the previous and updated trip generations for each land use, including the estimated new daily and peak hour trips added to the roadway network. Table 1 – Trip Generation for 5146 Eden Ave (Grandview Yard) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Land Use Size Assumption1 5146 Eden Ave (old Public Works Site) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 165 Units 898 59 73 Current Proposed Land Use Size2 5146 Eden Ave (old Public Works Site)3 Senior Adult Housing – Multifamily (252) 90 Units 292 18 23 Fine Dining Restaurant (931) 13,500 SF GFA 1,132 10 105 Total Trips 1,424 28 128 Total Trip Difference +526 -31 +55 Notes: 12021 East Grandview District Traffic Study (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition 3 Proposed green space has no trip generation; therefore users are assumed multi-use trips 5.3 Trip Generation – Surrounding Developments Additionally, this study also confirmed the land use sizes for the redevelopment plans at 5100 Eden Avenue (Eden 100 Building) and 4917 Eden Avenue (old Perkins Restaurant site). This study updated the trip generation for each site from previous studies to be included in the No Build traffic volumes. The Grandview East Transportation Study’s trip generation traffic for 5100 site used the same land use size that was confirmed by the City for this study (138 residential apartments); however, the earlier version of the ITE Trip Generation Manual was used. Table 2 summarizes the differences in the trip generation between the two ITE Trip Generation Manual editions. In general, the estimated trips were higher with the 10th edition compared to the 11th edition with a slight decrease in trips during the PM peak hour. Ultimately, the differences in trips during the AM and PM peak hour have nominal impact to the operations. Note that existing traffic generated by the Eden 100 offices were not extracted from the No Build traffic volumes; therefore, the traffic volumes provide a conservative analysis. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 13 Table 2 – Trip Generation for 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Trip Generation1 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 138 Units 751 50 62 Current Proposed Trip Generation2 5100 Eden Ave (Eden 100 Building) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 138 Units 627 51 54 Total Trip Difference -124 +1 -8 Notes: 12021 East Grandview District Traffic Study (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition The 2021 Traffic and Parking Study for 5917 Eden Avenue’s trip generation used comparable land use sizes, with a small difference in the number of dwelling units (reduced from 208 to 196). The square footage for the fast-food restaurant remained the same at 3,700 SF. The ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition was also used in the previous study. Table 3 summarizes the differences in new trips using the previously assumed land use sizes and the updated land use sizes. Overall, a total of 144 net daily trips were added to the network and 65 net AM peak hour trips were added to the system. There was nominal change in the trip generation for the PM peak hour. Note that 2021 Traffic and Parking Study did not account for potential internal trip reduction between the land uses, which contributes to a more conservative traffic analysis. Ultimately, these trip differences were factored into the No Build volumes for this study. Table 3 – Trip Generation for 4917 Eden Ave (Old Perkins Restaurant) Site Address Land Use (ITE Code) Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Previous Land Use Size Assumption1 4917 Eden Ave (old Perkins site) Apartments 208 Units 1,132 75 92 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-thru 3,700 SF GFA 1,281 93 105 Total Trips 2,413 168 197 Updated Land Use Size2 4917 Eden Ave (old Perkins site) Multifamily Housing (Mid- Rise) (221) 196 Units 890 73 76 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-thru (933) 3,700 SF GFA 1,667 160 123 Total Trips 2,557 233 199 Total Trip Difference +144 +65 -2 Notes: 12021 Traffic and Parking Study for 4917 Eden Avenue (ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition) 2ITE Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 14 5.4 Trip Distribution The new trips were distributed to the intersections within the study area based on existing traffic data, proposed access locations, and logical transportation routes. The general trip distributions are the same or comparable to previously completed studies in the area, and are summarized below: · 15% to/from the west · 20% to/from the east · 30% to/from the south (via northbound TH 100) · 30% to/from the north (via southbound TH 100) · 5% to/from the south (via Normandale/W Frontage Road) 5.4.1 Restaurant Parking and Valet Distribution The proposed restaurant’s on-site parking lot will have 32 parking spaces, which are assumed to be used entirely by customers during the peak period. Employees are expected to utilize the Grandview Public Parking garage. Once the on-site spaces are full, customers will either use the valet service at the restaurant’s entrance/main parking lot or utilize the Grandview Public Parking lot. Valet parking is expected to use street parking on Brookside Avenue and/or the public parking garage. During the PM peak hour, 70 entering trips and 35 exiting trips are expected for the restaurant. New trips that are included in the valet service trips and the trips that enter the main lot before driving to the public parking garage were added to the network twice to account for this activity. Based on the expected parking activity distribution, the following activity is expected: · Restaurant Parking Lot - 32 trips (45%) assumed to enter the main lot until full - 17 trips (25%) assumed to enter the main lot to utilize the valet service or prior to driving to the public parking garage. · Grandview Public Parking Garage - 21 trips (30%) assumed to enter the public parking garage off Vernon Ave at either the Interlachen Blvd signal or at the at Gus Young Ln/Retail access. - Approximately 16 trips are expected to enter at Interlachen Blvd and 5 are expected to enter at the Gus Young/Retail access. - Trips assumed to enter the main lot prior to driving to the public parking garage are assumed to be small (~5 trips) and are expected to access the public parking garage via Arcadia Ave and Gus Young Lane. Grandview Public Parking entrance sign on Gus Young Boulevard. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 15 · Valet Parking/Brookside Avenue - 17 trips (25%) of new entering trips will utilize valet service or access the main lot before driving to the public parking garage. - Most of these trips are expected to utilize valet, which will likely access space on Brookside Avenue via Arcadia and Eden. The Build Traffic Volumes for the 2024 and 2042 analysis years are included in Appendix B. 6 Traffic Operations Analysis Traffic operations analyses were conducted to determine the level of service (LOS), delay, and queueing information for the AM and PM peak hour conditions for the no build and full build scenarios. LOS is a qualitative rating system used to describe the efficiency of traffic operations at an intersection. Six LOS are defined, designated by letters A through F. LOS A represents the best operating conditions (no congestion), and LOS F represents the worst operating conditions (severe congestion). For the study intersection it was assumed that a LOS D or better, for all approaches and the overall intersection, represents acceptable operating conditions. LOS for intersections is determined by the average control delay per vehicle. The range of control delay for each LOS is different for signalized and unsignalized intersections. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes and will experience greater delays than an unsignalized intersection; driver tolerance for delay is greater at a signal than at a stop sign. Therefore, the LOS thresholds for each LOS category are lower for unsignalized intersections than for signalized intersections Table 4 – Level of Service Thresholds Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec/veh) Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection (Stop Control/Roundabout) A 0 to 10 0 to 10 B > 10 and ≤ 20 > 10 and ≤ 15 C > 20 and ≤ 35 > 15 and ≤ 25 D > 35 and ≤ 55 > 25 and ≤ 35 E > 55 and ≤ 80 > 35 and ≤ 50 F > 80 > 50 Operational analysis was conducted using Synchro/SimTraffic software (version 11) for all study intersections. The average of ten simulation runs were performed to determine the necessary measure of effectiveness (MOE’s). The East Grandview Transportation Study performed the roundabout analyses using the Highway Capacity Software (HCS7), which implements the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) calculations. The study found that operational results of the roundabouts were similar to SimTraffic results. Therefore, this study only utilized Synchro/SimTraffic software to analyze each intersection control option and does not include reports from HCS. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 16 Currently, there is not a standard traffic operations analysis tool to evaluate a mini roundabout; there are only guidelines for the expected operational capacity of the intersection. It should be noted that a mini roundabout would have slightly less capacity than any single-lane roundabout examined in this section. FHWA guidance suggests a total entering demand for a mini roundabout to be less than 1,600 vehicles per hour on all approaches, this threshold will be reviewed at each of the roundabout-controlled intersection. 6.1 Intersection Analysis The operations analysis summary will focus on the directly impacted study intersections, and the full analysis summary is included in Appendix C for all study intersections. 6.1.1 No Build Conditions The traffic operations analysis for the no build conditions includes the background traffic volumes and the existing or planned roadway/intersection conditions. 2024 No Build In the 2024 No Build scenario, the intersections will operate at LOS C or better with no major congestion. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 5. Most approaches are operating at a LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 875 vph to 1,165 vph. 2042 No Build Conditions In the 2042 No Build scenario, the intersections will continue to operate at LOS C or better with no major congestion. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 6. Most approaches are operating at LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. An LOS E is seen for the northbound approach at Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 920 vph to 1,220 vph. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 17 Table 5 – 2024 No Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 18.6 / B 20.6 / C 17.0 / B 17.2 / B WB 14.3 / B 16.7 / B NB 24.2 / C 18.5 / B SB 19.6 / B 14.9 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 16.1 / C 4.2 / A 21.7 / C 5.6 / A WB 15.7 / C 26.2 / D NB 3.5 / A 3.6 / A SB 2.2 / A 2.9 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 23.0 / C 22.9 / C 26.1 / C 30.1 / C WB 13.9 / B 21.0 / C NB 43.7 / D 50.8 / D SB 30.6 / C 44.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 6.9 / A 5.5 / A 5.3 / A 4.7 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 19.9 / C 20.7 / C SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 18.8 / B 22.7 / C 16.0 / B 25.7 / C WB 23.1 / C 27.7 / C NB SB 28.6 / C 36.4 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 2.7 / A 2.5 / A 2.2 / A WB 2.8 / A 1.8 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.3 / A 5.2 / A 1.1 / A 1.3 / A WB 4.7 / A 0.7 / A NB 13.0 / B 10.3 / B SB 34.1 / D 8.7 / A Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.7 / A 3.8 / A 3.5 / A 3.4 / A WB 4.0 / A 2.8 / A NB 4.4 / A 4.4 / A SB 5.0 / A 3.4 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 0.0 / A 0.8 / A 0.0 / A 0.3 / A WB 6.8 / A 4.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.1 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.1 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 0.0 / A 0.5 / A 0.0 / A 0.4 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.6 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.3 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 18 Table 6 – 2042 No Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 16.1 / B 21.3 / C 19.2 / B 17.7 / B WB 13.9 / B 18.4 / B NB 25.0 / C 18.9 / B SB 20.7 / C 14.8 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 13.7 / B 4.5 / A 25.0 / D 6.7 / A WB 18.1 / C 33.9 / D NB 3.7 / A 4.1 / A SB 2.4 / A 3.0 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 25.9 / C 24.6 / C 30.4 / C 33.7 / C WB 15.7 / B 23.0 / C NB 41.4 / D 52.9 / D SB 31.7 / C 49.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 9.1 / A 7.9 / A 6.5 / A 6.2 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 36.9 / E 33.2 / D SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 20.0 / C 24.0 / C 17.0 / B 27.8 / C WB 25.0 / C 29.8 / C NB SB 29.1 / C 39.7 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 3.4 / A 2.6 / A 2.4 / A WB 3.9 / A 2.1 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.4 / A 6.2 / A 1.6 / A 1.7 / A WB 5.3 / A 1.0 / A NB 16.4 / C 11.3 / B SB 17.1 / C 7.8 / A Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.9 / A 4.0 / A 3.7 / A 3.6 / A WB 3.9 / A 3.0 / A NB 4.7 / A 4.6 / A SB 6.0 / A 3.5 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 0.7 / A 0.4 / A WB 7.0 / A 4.3 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.2 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.1 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 0.5 / A 0.5 / A WB NB 0.5 / A 0.7 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.3 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 19 6.1.2 Build Conditions The traffic operations analysis for the build conditions includes the background traffic volumes and the new trips expected for the Grandview Yard development site. The existing or planned roadway conditions were continued to be used in the build analyses. 2024 Build Conditions In the 2024 Build scenario, the intersection operations are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions with intersections operating at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 7. Most movements are operating at LOS C or better with some movements operating at LOS D, which is considered acceptable. The northbound movement at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection during the AM peak hour experiences slightly more delay compared to the No Build scenario, with approximately 8 seconds of delay per vehicle added due to the new trips for the redevelopment. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 895 vph to 1,200 vph. 2042 Build Conditions In the 2042 Build scenario, the intersection operations are relatively comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions with intersections operating at LOS C or better with the exception of the Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd intersection operating at LOS D during the PM peak hour. It is expected that routine signal timing adjustments can be made to alleviate these delay concerns in the future to achieve acceptable operations. The traffic operations summary for the primary study intersections for the Grandview Yard development are summarized below in Table 8. Most movements are operating at LOS D or better. However, compared to the 2042 No Build operations, some movements are expected to experience slightly increased delay including the LOS E expected for the northbound and southbound approaches at Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd, LOS E in the AM peak hour for the northbound right-out movement at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave, and the westbound approach at the Vernon Ave/TH 100 SB ramp. See Appendix C for detailed individual intersection turning movement LOS. The peak hour volumes entering the three mini-roundabouts planned along Eden Avenue (Arcadia, Grange, and Willson) perform acceptably with intersection LOS A in both peak hours and all fall below FHWA’s 1,600 vph threshold, with the three mini-roundabouts ranging from approximately 940 vph to 1,255 vph. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 20 Table 7 – 2024 Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 20.9 / C 21.4 / C 17.6 / B 17.2 / B WB 14.1 / B 17.0 / B NB 25.0 / C 18.3 / B SB 21.0 / C 15.0 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 15.4 / C 4.5 / A 21.4 / C 5.6 / A WB 17.2 / C 26.8 / D NB 3.7 / A 3.6 / A SB 2.4 / A 2.8 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 23.3 / C 23.0 / C 26.8 / C 31.5 / C WB 14.1 / B 21.5 / C NB 40.3 / D 50.5 / D SB 31.0 / C 48.9 / D Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 9.1 / A 7.3 / A 6.3 / A 5.6 / A WB 1.1 / A 1.2 / A NB 28.6 / D 23.9 / C SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 20.3 / C 23.9 / C 16.9 / B 27.1 / C WB 24.8 / C 31.9 / C NB SB 28.8 / C 36.3 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.6 / A 2.8 / A 2.5 / A 2.4 / A WB 3.0 / A 2.3 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.4 / A 5.0 / A 1.3 / A 1.4 / A WB 4.5 / A 0.8 / A NB 12.1 / B 9.4 / A SB 19.2 / C 11.8 / B Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.8 / A 3.6 / A 3.5 / A 3.5 / A WB 3.6 / A 3.0 / A NB 4.5 / A 4.4 / A SB 4.8 / A 3.5 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 8.5 / A 0.8 / A 5.3 / A 0.9 / A WB 6.6 / A 5.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.5 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.2 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 7.3 / A 0.5 / A 11.7 / B 0.8 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.9 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.4 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 21 Table 8 – 2042 Build Operations Summary Intersection Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Approach (Delay / LOS) Intersection (Delay / LOS) Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 26.0 / C 21.2 / C 15.9 / B 18.6 / B WB 14.6 / B 20.0 / C NB 24.5 / C 20.0 / C SB 20.4 / C 15.0 / B Vernon Ave at Gus Young Lane/Retail EB 14.0 / B 4.9 / A 24.2 / C 6.9 / A WB 20.4 / C 30.9 / D NB 4.1 / A 4.6 / A SB 2.4 / A 3.5 / A Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 26.7 / C 25.4 / C 33.1 / C 37.3 / D WB 15.9 / B 23.3 / C NB 40.1 / D 55.4 / E SB 33.1 / C 60.3 / E Vernon Ave at Arcadia Ave EB 10.0 / B 8.2 / A 8.1 / A 8.0 / A WB 1.2 / A 1.2 / A NB 32.2 / D 41.1 / E SB Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB 21.0 / C 25.6 / C 18.9 / B 30.5 / C WB 28.8 / C 38.2 / D NB SB 28.7 / C 39.5 / D 50th St & NB TH 100 EB 2.7 / A 3.8 / A 2.8 / A 3.0 / A WB 4.5 / A 3.2 / A NB SB Eden Ave at Senior Living West Driveway/School Access EB 1.5 / A 6.5 / A 1.5 / A 1.7 / A WB 4.9 / A 0.9 / A NB 18.8 / C 12.0 / B SB 20.4 / C 11.5 / B Eden Ave at Arcadia Ave/Normandale Rd (Roundabout) EB 2.9 / A 4.1 / A 3.7 / A 3.7 / A WB 4.4 / A 3.2 / A NB 4.7 / A 4.7 / A SB 5.2 / A 3.6 / A Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 10.6 / B 0.8 / A 5.6 / A 0.9 / A WB 7.0 / A 5.4 / A NB 0.1 / A 0.4 / A SB 0.3 / A 0.3 / A Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East Driveway EB 9.6 / A 0.6 / A 8.4 / A 0.7 / A WB 0.0 / A 0.0 / A NB 0.5 / A 0.9 / A SB 0.4 / A 0.4 / A SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 22 6.2 Travel Demand Management Policy Review The City of Edina approved a Travel Demand Management (TDM) Policy in April 2021 to help identify and manage negative traffic impact as a result of new development. The TDM policy outlines two tiers for TDM Plans that can be reviewed by the developer depending on the proposed land use and size. This traffic study does not specifically include a TDM Plan for the development. However, based on the operations analyses, the proposed site plan, and sketch plan proposal submitted to the Planning Commission in January 2022, the Grandview Yard development is expected to align with the City’s TDM goals in several ways, including: · The Grandview Yard development will connect directly with the pedestrian bridge currently under construction (anticipated 2022 completion) and achieve goals to accommodate multimodal and active transportation in the Grandview District. The pedestrian bridge will also span across the existing railroad tracks, which poses as an existing barrier in the District. · The proposed public green space/plaza proposes to include pedestrian routes, terrace seating, a sloped lawn, and public restrooms. The green space also allocates space for event space to host small community gatherings. This amenity will be an attractive land use to further support an active and vibrant community for the area. · The restaurant land use will rely on the existing public parking garage to accommodate the parking demand and eliminate some single-occupancy trips on Arcadia Avenue. According to the parking study and trip generation review, there is adequate parking capacity in the public garage to accommodate the parking demand. · The development is within close proximity to existing transit services on Vernon Avenue. · The Grandview Transportation Plan proposes sidewalks along the south and east lot lines. · The planned roundabout at Eden Avenue/Arcadia Avenue and improvements on Eden Avenue in the project area are expected to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety and attract additional non-motorized users to the area. · The intersection operations analysis for the 2024 and 2042 Build scenarios do not show significant operational concerns due to the proposed development. Additional strategies that the development may consider to limit the number of single-occupancy vehicle trips and optimize the transportation network in the Grandview District include: · Designated rideshare drop-off areas and/or carpool parking spaces · Bicycle parking areas and accessible ramps · Discounted transit passes/transit benefits · Electric vehicle charging stations · Educate residents, employees, and customers on the benefits of carpooling and/or active transportation options, including maps of the surrounding bicycle networks and transit routes · Discourage trips into the restaurant parking area when the main lot is at capacity by additional signing and wayfinding to the public parking garage. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 23 7 Conclusions and Recommendations This study was intended to analyze the traffic operations of the proposed Grandview Yard development located at 5146 Eden Avenue (former Public Works site), which currently is vacant. The 3.125-acre parcel is located on the northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue and is proposed to include a 90-unit senior cooperative housing, a 2-story 13,500 square-foot restaurant, and an approximately 32,000 square-foot green space/public plaza. The purpose of the study was to identify any operational concerns due to the new traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. Traffic Study Summary: · The parking needs for the Senior Housing development are met as the proposed site includes a 173-space underground parking garage and the City code requires a total of 55 spaces. · The parking needs for the Restaurant development are met with consideration of the existing public parking ramp adjacent to the development. The City Code requires a total of 166 spaces and the restaurant will have access to 32 on-site parking spaces and the available Grandview public parking garage stalls, which provides an average of 215 unused spaces during peak periods (per the Grandview Parking Ramp study). · The proposed Grandview Yard development is expected to generate 1,424 weekday daily new trips, 28 AM peak hour new trips, and 128 PM peak hour new trips. · No Build operations were not significantly impacted by the new trips due to the relatively small number of new trips distributed to each intersection during the peak hours within the Grandview network. · The planned mini-roundabouts along Eden Avenue at Arcadia, Grange, and Willson are all expected to perform well with the 2024 and 2042 Build volumes. · Traffic operations for the 2024 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C and no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. All approaches operate acceptably at LOS D or better. · Traffic operations for the 2042 No Build scenario are acceptable, with intersections performing at LOS C or better with no major congestion concerns at the primary study intersections. LOS E is expected for the NB approach at Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave during the AM peak hour. · Traffic operations for the 2024 Build scenario are comparable to the 2024 No Build conditions. All intersections and movements operate at LSO D or better. Additional development traffic has nominal impact to operations. · Traffic operations for the 2042 Build scenario are comparable to the 2042 No Build conditions. The additional development traffic does add delays for a few approaches that reach LOS E during the peak hours, but overall, all intersections operate at a LOS D or better. Recommendations summary: · It is recommended that the Vernon Ave/Arcadia Ave intersection be monitored in the future to understand if there are any future operations or queueing concerns that should be addressed once development changes occur. · Signal timing adjustments and coordination along Vernon Avenue may be necessary to accommodate background traffic demand in addition to new development traffic. SAVE AS REPORT TITLE... EDINA 168382 Page 24 Specifically monitor signal timings at the Vernon Ave/SB TH 100 interchange ramp and Vernon Ave/Interlachen Blvd. · Consider spacing the two proposed driveways on Arcadia Avenue further apart to avoid turning conflicts or driver confusion. · Encourage public parking garage parking for the restaurant/discourage double trips onto the roadway network · Monitor valet parking activity and circulation to mitigate safety issues on Arcadia Ave during peak periods. Appendix A Grandview Yard Concept Plan Appendix B Intersection Volume Figures !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInterlachen Blvd Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Normandale RdBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 Planned/Existing Lane Geometrics Figure1Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: bandertProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 7/28/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 ³>=³>P>PP>³Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > W 50th St ³P³>³ = Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>P³>Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$OP=>OPèéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd>PP>>P>³P>³Vernon Ave 3 !"$= ³³³PèéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 >=O³³=³OGus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 ³>=³P>³O=O=!"$ !"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³³>=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 ³³=³³=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 OP>=!"$Arcadia Ave9 ³³!"$ Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)³>=³>=³>=³>=15 !"$City Hall16 Eden AveGrange RdEden Ave OP Willson RdP=>OOPOPOPOPOPOP OP!"$Grange Rd10 >==TH 100 Ramps ³=³>= Roundabout Control Intersection GeometricsOP !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Intersection IDX => !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInterlachen Blvd Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Normandale RdBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2024 No Build Conditions Figure2Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDIN A 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 190 / (164)2 / (4)198 / (220)2 / (2)619 / (915)260 / (276)6 / (2)5 / (10)4 / (5)11 / (7)383 / (493)117 / (107)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > 1372 / (867)181 / (119) 692 / (1336)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)192 / (237)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>³>3 / (4)372 / (355) 4 / (2)360 / (372)3 / (13)0 / (15)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 1 / (0)322 / (347)152 / (17)53 / (10)151 / (18)2 / (1)249 / (371)109 / (15)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 94 / (80)295 / (173)44 / (49)64 / (81)70 / (87)15 / (9)49 / (59)306 / (291)46 / (50)116 / (110)46 / (110)17 / (26)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 171 / (246)304 / (225)5 / (5)80 / (88)154 / (115)138 / (193)2 / (2)>=4 / (40)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd308 / (376)379 / (420)81 / (73)19 / (29)67 / (116)13 / (24)178 / (292)560 / (769)64 / (37)162 / (99)84 / (80)373 / (426)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 769 / (869)166 / (167)914 / (1180)32 / (39)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 61 / (65)4 / (12)52 / (73)13 / (9)720 / (1008)76 / (59)12 / (12)4 / (12)12 / (12)29 / (27)467 / (456)57 / (55)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 546 / (514)419 / (329) 697 / (896)383 / (450)223 / (355)66 / (63)366 / (655)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 585 / (335)965 / (843) 691 / (1247)372 / (304) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour Vo lumePM Peak Hour Vo lume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabou t Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)139 / (70)41 / (52) 10 / (10)143 / (159)215 / (226) Eden Ave 5 / (22)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd104 / (168)249 / (177) 190 / (142)225 / (237) Eden Ave 241 / (155)142 / (158)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³16 / (25)51 / (19)117 / (228)³225 / (206)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)164 / (236)4 / (11)203 / (192)10 / (27)!"$Arcadia Ave9 179 / (246)213 / (219)!"$209 / (253)0 / (0)45 / (73)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=³³³=³> !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInterlachen Blvd Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Normandale RdBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2042 No Build Conditions Figure3Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDINA 168382 User Name: bandertProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 200 / (171)2 / (4)208 / (231)2 / (2)653 / (964)273 / (290)6 / (2)5 / (11)4 / (5)12 / (7)404 / (520)123 / (113)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 1446 / (913)191 / (125) 727 / (1409)4 / (9) W 50th St 0 / (0)201 / (249)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$³>3 / (4)389 / (371) 4 / (2)380 / (390)3 / (14)0 / (16)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 1 / (0)336 / (362)161 / (18)56 / (11)159 / (19)2 / (1)263 / (389)115 / (16)0 / (2)1 / (4)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 98 / (83)309 / (180)47 / (52)67 / (85)74 / (91)16 / (10)52 / (54)322 / (305)49 / (53)122 / (115)49 / (116)16 / (28)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 180 / (259)319 / (235)5 / (5)84 / (91)161 / (120)143 / (202)2 / (2)>=4 / (43)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd325 / (396)400 / (443)85 / (77)20 / (31)70 / (122)14 / (26)187 / (307)590 / (809)67 / (39)171 / (104)89 / (85)393 / (448)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 810 / (916)174 / (174)963 / (1242)34 / (41)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 64 / (68)4 / (13)55 / (77)14 / (10)759 / (1062)80 / (62)13 / (13)4 / (13)13 / (13)31 / (29)492 / (481)60 / (58)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 575 / (542)439 / (344) 733 / (943)403 / (474)235 / (374)69 / (66)385 / (689)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 617 / (353)1014 / (886) 727 / (1313)391 / (319) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour VolumePM Peak Hour Volume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabout Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)146 / (74)44 / (55) 11 / (11)148 / (167)225 / (237) Eden Ave 5 / (23)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd109 / (177)259 / (185) 197 / (147)234 / (249) Eden Ave 252 / (160)150 / (166)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³17 / (27)54 / (20)122 / (240)³237 / (215)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)172 / (249)4 / (11)215 / (201)10 / (27)!"$Arcadia Ave9 187 / (259)225 / (228)!"$217 / (265)0 / (0)48 / (77)=>Driveway³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=³³³=³>> !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInterlachen Blvd Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Normandale RdBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2024 Build Conditions Figure4Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDIN A 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 190 / (164)2 / (4)200 / (226)2 / (2)620 / (918)261 / (285)6 / (2)5 / (10)4 / (5)11 / (7)383 / (495)117 / (107)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 > 1373 / (871)182 / (132) 692 / (1338)4 / (8) W 50th St 0 / (0)194 / (246)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$=>³>3 / (22)374 / (361) 4 / (2)361 / (381)3 / (13)0 / (24)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 3 / (4)322 / (369)152 / (17)53 / (10)151 / (18)3 / (3)249 / (387)109 / (15)2 / (4)4 / (6)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 96 / (108)297 / (177)44 / (49)64 / (81)70 / (91)15 / (9)49 / (68)308 / (293)47 / (50)116 / (132)46 / (112)17 / (31)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 173 / (252)307 / (244)5 / (5)80 / (88)154 / (115)138 / (193)2 / (2)>=4 / (40)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd309 / (376)379 / (420)86 / (89)19 / (29)67 / (116)13 / (33)178 / (292)560 / (769)64 / (37)162 / (99)84 / (80)373 / (426)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 774 / (885)175 / (188)914 / (1189)32 / (39)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 61 / (65)4 / (12)52 / (75)13 / (9)720 / (1008)77 / (62)12 / (12)4 / (12)12 / (12)29 / (27)467 / (456)57 / (55)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 549 / (524)419 / (329) 706 / (926)383 / (450)225 / (361)69 / (82)366 / (655)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 585 / (335)968 / (853) 691 / (1249)381 / (332) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour Vo lumePM Peak Hour Vo lume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabou t Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)140 / (83)41 / (52) 10 / (10)144 / (166)215 / (226) Eden Ave 5 / (22)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd104 / (168)250 / (190) 190 / (142)227 / (244) Eden Ave 244 / (174)142 / (158)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³16 / (25)54 / (38)117 / (229)³234 / (228)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)1 / (15)166 / (241)4 / (11)1 / (43)210 / (199)10 / (27)!"$Senior Housing Access Arcadia Ave9 7 / (6)0 / (0)2 / (4)179 / (275)1 / (4)214 / (263)!"$209 / (253)0 / (0)45 / (73)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=>=³>³=³=³>=>Restaurant Access Senior Housing Access !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(Vernon Ave SGus Young Ln Arcadia AveInterlachen Blvd Eden Ave Grange RdW 50th St Normandale RdBrookside Ave?úA@ ?úA@ 11 2 3 4 15 10 6 7 1 12 13 14 16 5 98 2042 Build Conditions Figure5Grandview Yard Traffic StudyEdina, MN Project: EDIN A 168382 User Name: ljohnsonProjection: Hennepin County Coords.Source: ESRI Online Print Date: 8/2/2022 èéEden Ave Vernon Ave11 200 / (171)2 / (4)210 / (237)2 / (2)654 / (967)274 / (299)6 / (2)5 / (11)4 / (5)12 / (7)404 / (522)123 / (113)Arcadia Ave!"$Eden Ave6 1447 / (917)192 / (138) 727 / (1411)4 / (9) W 50th St 0 / (0)203 / (258)= Eden Ave Brookside Ave12 !"$³>3 / (22)391 / (377) 4 / (2)381 / (399)3 / (14)0 / (25)Eden Ave Our Lady Of Grace School Access13 !"$=> 3 / (4)336 / (384)161 / (18)56 / (11)159 / (19)3 / (3)263 / (405)115 / (16)2 / (4)4 / (6)=>Eden Ave Normandale Rd14 Arcadia Ave!",$ 100 / (111)311 / (184)47 / (52)67 / (85)74 / (95)16 / (10)52 / (70)324 / (307)50 / (53)122 / (137)49 / (118)16 / (33)Eden Ave Willson RdGrange Rd!",$ 3 / (10)143 / (91)42 / (52)98 / (95)95 / (158)44 / (73)174 / (142)125 / (142)102 / (101)239 / (168)111 / (125)35 / (33)!"$Grange Rd10 182 / (265)322 / (254)5 / (5)84 / (91)161 / (120)143 / (202)2 / (2)>=4 / (43)=TH 100 Ramps èéVernon Ave Gus Young Ln2 Interlachen Blvd325 / (396)400 / (443)90 / (93)20 / (31)70 / (122)14 / (35)187 / (307)590 / (809)67 / (39)171 / (104)89 / (85)393 / (448)Vernon Ave 3 !"$= 815 / (932)183 / (195)963 / (1251)34 / (41)³=Gus Young Ln Vernon Ave1 !"$ 64 / (68)4 / (13)55 / (79)14 / (10)759 / (1062)81 / (65)13 / (13)4 / (13)13 / (13)31 / (29)492 / (481)60 / (58)³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³ èéVernon Ave TH 100 West Ramps4 578 / (552)439 / (344) 742 / (973)403 / (474)237 / (380)72 / (85)385 / (689)³>=³>³=W 50th St TH 100 East Ramps5 617 / (353)1017 / (896) 727 / (1315)400 / (347) ³=³=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>³=Arcadia AveIntersection ID Turning MovementsOP X XX / (XX)AM Peak Hour Vo lumePM Peak Hour Vo lume !"$ Signalized Intersectionèé Minor Street Stop Control !",$All Way Stop Control Roundabou t Control15 !"$City Hall16 5 / (5)147 / (87)44 / (55) 11 / (11)150 / (174)225 / (237) Eden Ave 5 / (23)0 / (0)5 / (5)Grange Rd109 / (177)260 / (198) 197 / (147)236 / (256) Eden Ave 255 / (179)150 / (166)Willson Rd!"$S TH 100 Ramp Arcadia Ave7 ³17 / (27)57 / (39)122 / (241)³246 / (237)>=!"$Driveway Arcadia Ave8 22 / (14)15 / (10)1 / (15)174 / (254)4 / (11)1 / (43)222 / (208)10 / (27)!"$Senior Housing Access Arcadia Ave9 7 / (6)0 / (0)2 / (4)187 / (288)1 / (4)226 / (272)!"$217 / (265)0 / (0)48 / (77)=>³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³>=³=³>>=>=>=³>³=³= > >³>=³>=2 / (15)0 / (0)0 / (28) Restaurant Access Senior Housing Access Appendix C Traffic Operational Results Table B1Grandview Yard2024 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 6 5 4 15 21.6 C 22.2 C 5.6 A 18.6 B 50 20 3700356 20 3900 000WB 198 2 192 392 19.9 B 13.6 B 8.3 A 14.3 B 20.6 C 100 8214701 % 635 67 21900 000NB 2 619 260 881 62.1E31.4 C 6.4 A 24.2 C 100 20 41022 % 379 1863232 %0250 61220SB 117 383 11 511 28.2 C 17.4 B 13.1 B 19.6 B 145 6415401 % 792 89 171 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 21.7 C 25.9 D 5.4 A 16.1 C00000204 20 49 1 %050 20 31WB 52 4 61 117 22.0 C 24.3 C 10.3 B 15.7 C 4.2 A00000418 34 86 6 % 3 % 50 3186NB 13 720 76 809 7.0 A 3.4 A 3.7 A 3.5 A 100 20 2700792 20 2100140 20 20SB 57 467 29 553 10.3 B 1.3 A 1.3 A 2.2 A 100 20 720038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 560 64 802 37.9 D 18.9 B 17.7 B 23.0 C 150 10722001 % 382 1883821 %0000WB 81 379 309 769 27.6 C 13.3 B 11.4 B 13.9 B 22.9 C 200 46 12700390 110 25700 000NB 19 67 13 99 51.2 D 44.2 D 30.1 C 43.7 D 50 2086023 % 438 60 14000 000SB 373 84 162 619 37.1 D 29.5 C 16.2 B 30.6 C 590 185 34901 %0111 24800 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0914 32 9460.0 07.0 A 4.4 A 6.9 A00003 % 390 85 324 13 %0000WB076907690.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 5.5 A00000 00000 000NB00166 1660.0 019.9 C 19.9 C00000 00000295 67 179SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0697 383 1,0800.0 023.6 C 10.1 B 18.8 B00000152159 204007582 177WB 419 5460965 35.3 D 13.6 B0.0 023.1 C 22.7 C00000378 27548500 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 366 66 223 655 38.1 D 38.9 D 10.4 B 28.6 C 500 115 227001106 167 26300300 58 13950th St & NB TH 100 EB0691 372 1,0630.0 01.6 A 4.4 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB0965 585 1,5500.0 01.9 A 4.2 A 2.8 A 2.7 A00000171 20 6802 % 252350NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB0692 4 6960.0 00.6 A 0.5 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 181 137201,553 6.9 A 0.7 A0.0 01.4 A 1.6 A 120 481080032702000 000NB00192 1920.0 00.3 A 7.4 A 7.2 A00000242 48 12400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 3600364 3.7 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 100 20 280063502000 000WB0372 3 3750.0 00.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.1 A 3.1 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 249 109 360 4.8 A 1.6 A 0.5 A 1.3 A00000140 20 6900 000WB 152 322 1 475 7.7 A 3.4 A 0.1 A 4.7 A 5.2 A00000676412800 000NB 530151 204 30.6 D0.0 06.7 A 13.0 B 320 31 12000 00000100 33111SB 1001 34.1 D0.0 0 0.0 034.1 D00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 49 306 46 401 2.0 A 3.0 A 1.8 A 2.7 A0000067 277500 000WB 44 295 94 433 3.0 A 4.2 A 3.5 A 4.0 A 3.8 A0000082 4413400 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 64 70 15 149 3.9 A 5.0 A 3.9 A 4.4 A00000642 27 7700 000SB 17 46 116 179 3.7 A 5.1 A 5.1 A 5.0 A00000156 36 10400 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 51016 67 6.4 A0.0 01.4 A 5.1 A 1.0 A 340 27 6700 00000 000NB022502250.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6800 000SB011701170.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 15022 37 7.0 A0.0 06.6 A 6.8 A 0.8 A00000235 23 5300 000NB0203 10 2130.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A00000200000000SB 4 1640168 1.6 A 0.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002020 3300 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB021302130.0 00.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB017901790.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 190 2250415 3.6 A 4.8 A0.0 04.2 A00000700 34 11100 000WB0249 104 3530.0 02.8 A 5.0 A 3.4 A 3.6 A0000079 4712200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1420241 383 3.2 A 1.7 A 3.4 A 3.2 A0000080 3912800 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 142 215 367 1.1 A 1.6 A 1.2 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6300 000WB 41 139 5 185 2.9 A 4.3 A 3.1 A 4.0 A 2.4 A00000314 23 9000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 209045 254 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 25 8400 000SB 505 10 3.0 A 0.3 A 2.8 A 0.8 A00000349 20 2800 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 1710304 475 11.2 B0.0 02.6 A 5.6 A 320 55 11900 00000200 20 98WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.8 A 4.8 A 3.5 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 154 138 2 294 2.1 A 1.1 A 1.9 A 1.5 A0000080 249400 000SB080 5 850.0 00.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Grandview Yard2024 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 2 10 5 17 19.0 B 22.9 C 5.5 A 17.0 B 50 20 2001 % 356 20 5200 000WB 220 4 164 388 22.1 C 14.2 B 10.2 B 16.7 B 17.2 B 1008714801 % 635 69 23000 000NB 2 915 276 1,193 43.5 D 22.3 C 5.7 A 18.5 B 100 20 21026 % 379 1923482 %0250 66268SB 107 493 7 607 25.5 C 12.9 B 10.3 B 14.9 B 145 5414100792 84 17100 000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 31.8 D 29.4 D 5.7 A 21.7 C00000204 20 54 2 %050 20 32WB 73 12 65 150 35.3E36.1E14.4 B 26.2 D 5.6 A00000418 58 162 20 % 4 % 50 3999NB 9 1008 59 1,076 6.4 A 3.6 A 3.6 A 3.6 A 100 20 2000792 20 2700140020SB 55 456 27 538 14.4 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 2.9 A 100 25 750038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 292 769 37 1,098 45.1 D 19.3 B 20.3 C 26.1 C 150168 22903 % 382 2033773 %0000WB 73 420 376 869 35.3 D 20.5 C 18.9 B 21.0 C 30.1 C 200 52 11600390 167 31500 000NB 29 116 24 169 60.3E51.0 D 38.8 D 50.8 D 50 33100044 % 438 108 24500 000SB 426 80 99 605 52.1 D 36.3 D 20.5 C 44.9 D 590 236 484 2 % 1 %0125 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB01180 39 1,2190.0 05.4 A 3.7 A 5.3 A00002 % 390 70 293 8 %0000WB086908690.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 4.7 A00000 00000 000NB00167 1670.0 020.7 C 20.7 C00000 00000295 71 169SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0896 450 1,3460.0 019.8 B 8.3 A 16.0 B00000152159 213007579 187WB 329 5140843 44.1 D 17.1 B0.0 027.7 C 25.7 C00000378 25344900 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 655 63 355 1,073 46.5 D 54.8 D 15.2 B 36.4 D 500 225 393001106 273 458 6 %0300 11137050th St & NB TH 100 EB01247 304 1,5510.0 02.0 A 4.5 A 2.5 A00000 00000 000WB0843 335 1,1780.0 01.5 A 2.4 A 1.8 A 2.2 A00000171 20 530025 2036NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB01336 8 1,3440.0 00.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 119 8670986 18.2 C 0.4 A0.0 02.7 A 4.7 A 120 5713400327 20 5200 000NB00237 2370.0 02.1 A 35.1E33.7 D00000242 11127400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 3720374 4.2 A 0.8 A0.0 00.8 A 100 20 2000 00000 000WB0355 4 3590.0 00.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A 0.7 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 15013 28 9.1 A0.0 03.4 A 6.6 A00000345 20 4100 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 371 15 387 3.4 A 1.1 A 0.2 A 1.1 A00000140 20 5500 000WB 17 3470364 4.2 A 0.6 A0.0 00.7 A 1.3 A0000067 207300 000NB 10018 28 13.9 B0.0 08.5 A 10.3 B 320 20 3200 00000100 20 41SB 402 6 12.1 B0.0 03.5 A 8.7 A00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 52 291 50 393 2.8 A 3.7 A 2.7 A 3.5 A0000067 317000 000WB 49 173 80 302 2.6 A 3.0 A 2.6 A 2.8 A 3.4 A0000082 287300 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 81 87 9 177 4.0 A 4.8 A 4.1 A 4.4 A00000642 26 7800 000SB 26 110 110 246 3.4 A 3.4 A 3.3 A 3.4 A00000156 31 9700 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 19025 44 6.4 A0.0 01.2 A 3.3 A 0.5 A 340 20 5000 00000 000NB020602060.0 00.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 5600 000SB022802280.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 10014 24 6.2 A0.0 03.3 A 4.4 A 0.3 A00000235 20 3800 000NB0192 27 2190.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 11 2360247 1.2 A 0.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 3600 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.4 A00000 00000 000NB021902190.0 00.6 A0.0 00.6 A00000 00000 000SB024602460.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A000001902000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 142 2370379 4.4 A 5.3 A0.0 05.0 A00000700 31 11000 000WB0177 168 3450.0 02.2 A 2.2 A 2.2 A 3.2 A0000079 309000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1580155 313 2.5 A 1.1 A 2.4 A 2.4 A0000080 208300 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 159 226 395 1.9 A 1.9 A 1.7 A 1.8 A0000079 20 6400 000WB 52 70 5 127 3.3 A 4.0 A 3.0 A 3.7 A 2.8 A00000314 20 7300 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 253073 326 3.8 A0.0 03.6 A 3.8 A00000432 31 9600 000SB 5022 27 3.3 A0.0 03.0 A 3.0 A00000349 20 3500 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 2460225 471 21.9 C0.0 03.5 A 13.0 B 320 92 24000 00000200 20 150WB0040 400.0 0 0.0 06.5 A 6.5 A 7.5 A00000159 21 5500 000NB 115 193 2 310 2.7 A 2.0 A 1.0 A 2.2 A0000080 2711600 000SB088 5 930.0 00.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B2Grandview Yard2024 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 6 5 4 15 29.6 C 24.3 C 5.9 A 20.9 C 50 20 3500356 20 4100 000WB 200 2 192 394 19.9 B 15.5 B 8.2 A 14.1 B 21.4 C 100 7914701 % 635 63 21200 000NB 2 620 261 883 61.2E32.6 C 6.4 A 25.0 C 100 20 78022 % 379 1873503 %0250 65269SB 117 383 11 511 29.1 C 18.8 B 15.2 B 21.0 C 145 6414401 % 792 94 195 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 4 12 28 22.7 C 26.8 D 4.7 A 15.4 C00000204 20 47 1 %050 20 31WB 52 4 61 117 23.5 C 26.3 D 11.5 B 17.2 C 4.5 A00000418 37 114 7 % 3 % 50 3083NB 13 720 77 810 5.9 A 3.6 A 3.9 A 3.7 A 100 20 2500792 20 5200140020SB 57 467 29 553 10.8 B 1.4 A 1.2 A 2.4 A 100 23 7600 00000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 178 560 64 802 34.9 C 20.4 C 17.9 B 23.3 C 150 9920601 % 382 1923811 %0000WB 86 379 309 774 28.1 C 13.4 B 11.2 B 14.1 B 23.0 C 200 49 12200390 108 24700 000NB 19 67 13 99 44.5 D 41.7 D 27.0 C 40.3 D 50 2179023 % 438 58 12800 000SB 373 84 162 619 37.4 D 29.1 C 17.1 B 31.0 C 590 185 36801 %0116 26500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0914 32 9460.0 09.2 A 6.8 A 9.1 A00005 % 390 11734918 %0000WB077407740.0 01.1 A0.0 01.1 A 7.3 A00000 00000 000NB00175 1750.0 028.6 D 28.6 D00000 00000295 78 222SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0706 383 1,0890.0 025.5 C 10.8 B 20.3 C00000152166 207007580 177WB 419 5490968 38.0 D 14.6 B0.0 024.8 C 23.9 C00000378 28749000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 366 69 225 660 37.9 D 40.4 D 10.2 B 28.8 C 500 122 243001106 171 27400300 54 12450th St & NB TH 100 EB0691 381 1,0720.0 01.6 A 4.4 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB0968 585 1,5530.0 02.2 A 4.3 A 3.0 A 2.8 A00000171 20 12202 % 252250NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB0692 4 6960.0 00.6 A 0.4 A 0.6 A0000034202000 000WB 182 137301,555 7.3 A 0.7 A0.0 01.5 A 1.7 A 120 481070032702000 000NB00194 1940.0 00.4 A 7.2 A 7.0 A00000242 47 11100 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 3610365 3.8 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 1000200063502000 000WB0374 3 3770.0 00.7 A 0.6 A 0.7 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.0 A 3.0 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 3 249 109 361 4.7 A 1.7 A 0.6 A 1.4 A00000140 20 8100 000WB 152 322 3 477 7.8 A 3.0 A 0.7 A 4.5 A 5.0 A00000676012500 000NB 530151 204 28.1 D0.0 06.9 A 12.1 B 320 29 11000 00001 % 100 33110SB 402 6 25.5 D0.0 06.6 A 19.2 C00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 49 308 47 404 2.0 A 3.0 A 1.9 A 2.8 A0000067 267700 000WB 44 297 96 437 3.1 A 3.8 A 3.1 A 3.6 A 3.6 A0000082 4411600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 64 70 15 149 4.0 A 5.2 A 3.7 A 4.5 A00000642 28 7000 000SB 17 46 116 179 4.6 A 4.9 A 4.7 A 4.8 A00000156 36 10300 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 54016 70 6.3 A0.0 01.3 A 4.9 A 1.0 A 340 26 6100 00000 000NB023402340.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB011701170.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 2002 8.5 A0.0 0 0.0 08.5 A00000261 20 3100 000WB 15022 37 6.7 A0.0 06.5 A 6.6 A 0.8 A00000235 21 4700 000NB 1 210 10 221 1.3 A 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A00000 00000 000SB 4 166 1 171 1.5 A 0.3 A 0.3 A 0.3 A000002020 2500 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 7007 7.3 A0.0 0 0.0 07.3 A00000268 20 3100 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB 1 2140215 2.3 A 0.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB0179 2 1810.0 00.3 A 0.4 A 0.3 A00000200000000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 190 2270417 3.7 A 5.2 A0.0 04.5 A00000700 37 12500 000WB0250 104 3540.0 02.7 A 4.7 A 3.2 A 3.6 A0000079 4712200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1420244 386 3.3 A 1.5 A 3.2 A 3.1 A0000080 3510900 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 144 215 369 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6200 000WB 41 140 5 186 3.1 A 4.2 A 2.5 A 3.9 A 2.3 A00000314 24 8000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 209045 254 3.0 A0.0 03.1 A 3.0 A00000432 24 8100 000SB 505 10 3.4 A 0.2 A 2.6 A 0.7 A00000349 20 2800 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 1730307 480 12.2 B0.0 02.5 A 6.0 A 320 58 13200 00000200 20 83WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.1 A 4.1 A 3.7 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 154 138 2 294 2.1 A 1.1 A 0.2 A 1.5 A0000080 218600 000SB080 5 850.0 00.4 A 0.7 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000AM Peak HourVehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s) Grandview Yard2024 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 2 10 5 17 19.9 B 23.5 C 6.6 A 17.6 B 50 20 2701 % 356 20 5500 000WB 226 4 164 394 22.1 C 16.2 B 10.3 B 17.0 B 17.2 B 1009214901 % 635 73 25400 000NB 2 918 285 1,205 34.5 C 22.1 C 5.6 A 18.3 B 100 20 41026 % 379 188 317 1 %0250 56 146SB 107 495 7 609 24.7 C 13.1 B 8.8 A 15.0 B 145 5613401 % 792 89 198 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 12 12 12 36 25.9 D 30.8 D 5.7 A 21.4 C00000204 21 63 3 %050 20 31WB 75 12 65 152 33.5 D 38.2E15.6 C 26.8 D 5.6 A00000418 56 163 21 % 3 % 50 3697NB 9 1008 62 1,079 7.0 A 3.6 A 3.4 A 3.6 A 100 20 2400792 20 3500140020SB 55 456 27 538 13.7 B 1.7 A 1.5 A 2.8 A 100 24 730038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 292 769 37 1,098 46.3 D 19.7 B 18.8 B 26.8 C 150169 23004 % 382 2053824 %0000WB 89 420 376 885 36.2 D 20.3 C 19.2 B 21.5 C 31.5 C 200 62 14200390 16234800 000NB 29 116 33 178 60.3E51.1 D 41.3 D 50.5 D 50 26100043 % 438 109 26500 000SB 426 80 99 605 56.6E37.9 D 24.3 C 48.9 D 590 2595623 % 1 %0134 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB01189 39 1,2280.0 06.3 A 4.8 A 6.3 A00003 % 390 90 316 10 %0000WB088508850.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 5.6 A00000 00000 000NB00188 1880.0 023.9 C 23.9 C00000 00000295 85 190SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0926 450 1,3760.0 020.6 C 9.1 A 16.9 B00000152166 212007581 180WB 329 5240853 51.2 D 19.6 B0.0 031.9 C 27.1 C00000378 27748900 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 655 82 361 1,098 45.9 D 53.8 D 15.3 B 36.3 D 500 230 391001106 273 456 6 %0300 10932250th St & NB TH 100 EB01249 332 1,5810.0 02.0 A 4.6 A 2.5 A00000 00000 000WB0853 335 1,1880.0 02.2 A 2.4 A 2.3 A 2.4 A00000171 20 720025 2043NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB01338 8 1,3460.0 00.9 A 0.7 A 0.9 A0000034202000 000WB 132 87101,003 17.3 C 0.4 A0.0 02.6 A 5.8 A 120 5713000 00000 000NB00246 2460.0 01.9 A 46.7E44.9E00000242 13229000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 3810383 3.1 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A 10002000 00000 000WB0361 22 3830.0 00.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 24013 37 9.2 A0.0 03.7 A 7.3 A00000345 20 4900 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 3 387 15 405 6.5 A 1.3 A 0.2 A 1.3 A00000140 20 7600 000WB 17 369 4 390 3.9 A 0.7 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 1.4 A0000067 207200 000NB 10018 28 11.4 B0.0 08.6 A 9.4 A 320 20 2600 00000100 20 36SB 604 10 15.5 C0.0 03.1 A 11.8 B00000239 20 2400 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 68 293 50 411 2.9 A 3.8 A 2.9 A 3.5 A0000067 337500 000WB 49 177 108 334 2.8 A 3.1 A 2.8 A 3.0 A 3.5 A0000082 308800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 81 91 9 181 4.0 A 4.8 A 3.9 A 4.4 A00000642 28 7300 000SB 31 112 132 275 3.4 A 3.6 A 3.5 A 3.5 A00000156 36 10400 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 38025 63 7.0 A0.0 01.4 A 4.7 A 0.8 A 340 20 5900 00000 000NB022802280.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB022902290.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A00000588 20 2400 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 15028 43 7.6 A0.0 04.0 A 5.3 A00000261 25 5800 000WB 10014 24 7.9 A0.0 03.7 A 5.4 A 0.9 A00000235 20 4000 000NB 43 199 27 269 1.6 A 0.3 A 0.0 A 0.5 A000002020 3400 000SB 11 241 15 267 1.6 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.2 A000002020 4500 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 6006 11.7 B0.0 0 0.0 011.7 B00000268 20 3100 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.8 A00000 00000 000NB 4 2630267 2.3 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A00000156 20 4000 000SB0275 4 2790.0 00.4 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 142 2440386 4.7 A 5.8 A0.0 05.4 A00000700 35 13000 000WB0190 168 3580.0 02.3 A 2.3 A 2.3 A 3.5 A0000079 319200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1580174 332 3.0 A 1.3 A 2.9 A 2.9 A0000080 2811100 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 10 166 226 402 2.6 A 2.4 A 2.0 A 2.2 A0000079 208500 000WB 52 83 5 140 3.4 A 4.0 A 3.5 A 3.8 A 3.8 A00000314 20 6800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 253073 326 5.9 A0.0 06.1 A 5.9 A00000432 36 13000 000SB 5022 27 2.8 A0.0 03.3 A 3.2 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 2520244 496 27.0 D0.0 03.9 A 15.4 C 320 10527200 00000200 27181WB0040 400.0 0 0.0 07.3 A 7.3 A 8.9 A00000159 21 6200 000NB 115 193 2 310 2.7 A 2.0 A 5.7 A 2.2 A0000080 2710000 000SB088 5 930.0 00.5 A 0.5 A 0.5 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B3Grandview Yard2042 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 6 5 4 15 24.8 C 20.5 C 3.0 A 16.1 B 50 20 3100356 20 3500 000WB 208 2 200 410 19.3 B 20.0 C 8.5 A 13.9 B 21.3 C 100 7714301 % 635 63 21700 000NB 2 653 273 928 65.7E32.3 C 6.3 A 25.0 C 100 20 26026 % 379 1923493 %0250 69248SB 123 404 12 539 29.3 C 18.4 B 17.3 B 20.7 C 145 6815501 % 792 99 209 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 4 13 30 21.3 C 17.1 C 5.3 A 13.7 B00000204 20 460050 20 37WB 55 4 64 123 25.1 D 26.6 D 11.3 B 18.1 C 4.5 A00000418 38 93 9 % 3 % 50 3086NB 14 759 80 853 6.2 A 3.6 A 3.9 A 3.7 A 100 20 2300792 20 7300140020SB 60 492 31 583 11.1 B 1.4 A 1.4 A 2.4 A 100 23 750038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 187 590 67 844 39.2 D 22.2 C 20.4 C 25.9 C 150 11422602 % 382 2043862 %0000WB 85 400 325 810 30.6 C 14.5 B 13.3 B 15.7 B 24.6 C 200 53 14100390 122 25900 000NB 20 70 14 104 41.9 D 43.9 D 25.5 C 41.4 D 50 2067025 % 438 61 14300 000SB 393 89 171 653 39.2 D 29.1 C 16.6 B 31.7 C 590 195 404 1 % 1 %0123 27400 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0963 34 9970.0 09.2 A 6.6 A 9.1 A00005 % 390 11536216 %0000WB081008100.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 7.9 A00000 00000 000NB00174 1740.0 036.9E36.9E00000 00000295 91256SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0733 403 1,1360.0 024.8 C 11.2 B 20.0 C00000152163 208007588 181WB 439 57501,014 38.9 D 14.7 B0.0 025.0 C 24.0 C00000378 28947200 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 385 69 235 689 38.0 D 41.9 D 10.5 B 29.1 C 500 121 262001106 173 30200300 56 14250th St & NB TH 100 EB0727 391 1,1180.0 01.6 A 4.5 A 2.6 A00000 00000 000WB01014 617 1,6310.0 03.2 A 5.0 A 3.9 A 3.4 A00000171 20 12602 % 2528 51NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB0727 4 7310.0 00.6 A 0.4 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 191 144601,637 7.4 A 0.7 A0.0 01.5 A 1.7 A 120 501180032702000 000NB00201 2010.0 00.3 A 7.4 A 7.2 A00000242 48 11800 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 3800384 4.7 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 100 20 2500635 20 2000 000WB0389 3 3920.0 00.8 A 0.4 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 03.6 A 3.6 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 2 263 115 380 5.0 A 1.7 A 0.7 A 1.4 A00000140 20 8000 000WB 161 336 1 498 8.4 A 3.7 A 1.4 A 5.3 A 6.2 A000006769 13200 000NB 560159 215 41.3E0.0 07.8 A 16.4 C 320 37 14800 00001 % 100 36135SB 1001 17.1 C0.0 0 0.0 017.1 C0000023902000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 52 322 49 423 2.1 A 3.1 A 2.2 A 2.9 A0000067 317900 000WB 47 309 98 454 3.2 A 4.1 A 3.3 A 3.9 A 4.0 A0000082 4512900 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 74 16 157 4.1 A 5.3 A 4.1 A 4.7 A00000642 29 8000 000SB 16 49 122 187 5.5 A 5.7 A 6.2 A 6.0 A00000156 41 12100 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 54017 71 7.2 A0.0 01.3 A 5.7 A 1.2 A 340 27 6400 00000 000NB023702370.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6200 000SB012201220.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A0000058802000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 15022 37 7.5 A0.0 06.7 A 7.0 A 0.7 A00000235 23 3900 000NB0215 10 2250.0 00.1 A 0.0 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 4 1720176 1.8 A 0.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002020 3000 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB022502250.0 00.5 A0.0 00.5 A00000 00000 000SB018701870.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 197 2340431 3.7 A 5.1 A0.0 04.5 A00000700 36 10000 000WB0259 109 3680.0 02.8 A 4.5 A 3.2 A 3.7 A0000079 4512200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1500252 402 3.8 A 1.7 A 3.4 A 3.4 A0000080 4613600 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 148 225 384 1.3 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 20 6300 000WB 44 146 5 195 3.2 A 4.4 A 3.0 A 4.1 A 2.4 A00000314 26 7800 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 217048 265 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 26 8900 000SB 505 10 4.1 A 0.3 A 3.5 A 0.8 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 1800319 499 12.5 B0.0 02.6 A 6.2 A 320 60 14000 00000200 20 95WB00440.0 0 0.0 04.3 A 4.3 A 3.9 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 161 143 2 306 2.0 A 1.2 A 0.3 A 1.5 A0000080 218200 000SB084 5 890.0 00.4 A 0.4 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Grandview Yard2042 No Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 2 11 5 18 36.1 D 22.4 C 5.5 A 19.2 B 50 20 2901 % 356 20 5800 000WB 231 4 171 406 24.3 C 15.8 B 10.6 B 18.4 B 17.7 B 1009514901 % 635 78 28200 000NB 2 964 290 1,256 33.9 C 22.9 C 6.3 A 18.9 B 100 20 38028 % 379 1963592 %0250 66248SB 113 520 7 640 25.0 C 12.9 B 8.1 A 14.8 B 145 5714101 % 792 90 198 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 13 13 39 33.0 D 34.8 D 4.9 A 25.0 D00000204 23 61 3 %050 20 33WB 77 13 68 158 43.7E41.0E21.5 C 33.9 D 6.7 A00000418 67 218 26 % 6 % 5043100NB 10 1062 62 1,134 7.7 A 4.1 A 3.7 A 4.1 A 100 20 2701 % 792 20 7300140020SB 58 481 29 568 14.7 B 1.7 A 1.7 A 3.0 A 100 27 700038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 307 809 39 1,155 58.0E20.4 C 17.6 B 30.4 C 150184 23003 % 382 2203803 %0000WB 77 443 396 916 37.5 D 21.6 C 21.9 C 23.0 C 33.7 C 200 53 12101 % 390 1883491 %0000NB 31 122 26 179 62.5E52.6 D 44.1 D 52.9 D 50 31100047 % 438 114 25700 000SB 448 85 104 637 58.8E37.0 D 23.7 C 49.9 D 590 2635624 % 1 %0143 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB01242 41 1,2830.0 06.6 A 4.3 A 6.5 A00003 % 390 88 289 11 %0000WB091609160.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 6.2 A0000015202000 000NB00174 1740.0 033.2 D 33.2 D00000 00000295 88 224SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0943 474 1,4170.0 021.0 C 8.7 A 17.0 B00000152166 209007580 181WB 344 5420886 48.6 D 18.1 B0.0 029.8 C 27.8 C00000378 27246300 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 689 66 374 1,129 50.3 D 59.9E16.5 B 39.7 D 500 252430001106 295 486 9 %0300 13239850th St & NB TH 100 EB01313 319 1,6320.0 02.1 A 4.7 A 2.6 A0000037802000 000WB0886 353 1,2390.0 01.9 A 2.7 A 2.1 A 2.4 A00000171 20 810025 2042NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB01409 9 1,4180.0 01.0 A 0.7 A 1.0 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 125 91301,038 19.0 C 0.4 A0.0 02.6 A 6.8 A 120 5413200327 20 6800 000NB00249 2490.0 01.4 A 58.4F56.6F00000242 15432100 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 3900392 4.2 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 10002000635 20 2000 000WB0371 4 3750.0 00.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 16014 30 9.6 A0.0 03.8 A 6.8 A00000345 20 4200 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 1 389 16 406 10.3 B 1.6 A 0.7 A 1.6 A00000140 20 11000 000WB 18 3620380 4.9 A 0.8 A0.0 01.0 A 1.7 A0000067 209400 000NB 11019 30 12.1 B0.0 010.9 B 11.3 B 320 20 2800 00000100 20 32SB 402 6 10.4 B0.0 02.7 A 7.8 A00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 54 305 53 412 3.1 A 3.9 A 2.9 A 3.7 A0000067 357600 000WB 52 180 83 315 2.8 A 3.1 A 2.9 A 3.0 A 3.6 A0000082 308900 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 91 10 186 4.3 A 4.9 A 4.3 A 4.6 A00000642 29 7300 000SB 28 116 115 259 3.6 A 3.6 A 3.4 A 3.5 A00000156 31 9200 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 20027 47 6.5 A0.0 01.2 A 3.7 A 0.5 A 340 20 4800 00000 000NB021502150.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB024002400.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A00000588 20 2000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 10014 24 5.7 A0.0 03.4 A 4.3 A 0.4 A00000235 20 4000 000NB0201 27 2280.0 00.2 A 0.0 A 0.2 A000002002000 000SB 11 2490260 1.6 A 0.1 A0.0 00.1 A000002020 2800 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.5 A00000 00000 000NB022802280.0 00.7 A0.0 00.7 A0000015602000 000SB025902590.0 00.3 A0.0 00.3 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 147 2490396 5.3 A 6.5 A0.0 06.1 A00000700 39 16600 000WB0185 177 3620.0 02.3 A 2.2 A 2.3 A 3.8 A0000079 309200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1660160 326 3.1 A 1.1 A 2.9 A 2.9 A0000080 2611500 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 167 237 415 1.8 A 2.1 A 1.8 A 1.9 A0000079 207900 000WB 55 74 5 134 3.5 A 4.0 A 3.6 A 3.8 A 3.0 A00000314 20 6400 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 265077 342 4.2 A0.0 04.0 A 4.2 A00000432 35 10900 000SB 5023 28 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000349 20 3300 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 2590235 494 34.4 D0.0 04.5 A 19.7 C 320 12430600 00000200 42202WB0043 430.0 0 0.0 08.0 A 8.0 A 11.1 B00000159 24 5100 000NB 120 202 2 324 3.2 A 2.4 A 1.1 A 2.7 A0000080 3011600 000SB091 5 960.0 00.4 A 0.3 A 0.4 A0000018002000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Table B4Grandview Yard2042 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 6 5 4 15 33.5 C 28.5 C 5.0 A 26.0 C 50 20 3501 % 356 20 4800 000WB 210 2 200 412 20.0 C 9.9 A 9.0 A 14.6 B 21.2 C 100 8214801 % 635 66 20500 000NB 2 654 274 930 62.3E31.7 C 6.3 A 24.5 C 100 20 81024 % 379 1963623 %0250 71265SB 123 404 12 539 29.5 C 17.9 B 16.0 B 20.4 C 145 7016801 % 792 93 188 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 4 13 30 22.8 C 21.2 C 5.6 A 14.0 B00000204 20 390050 20 33WB 55 4 64 123 24.6 C 27.8 D 16.3 C 20.4 C 4.9 A00000418 38 129 7 % 4 % 50 3089NB 14 759 81 854 7.5 A 4.0 A 4.1 A 4.1 A 100 20 2500792 20 8200140020SB 60 492 31 583 10.9 B 1.4 A 1.3 A 2.4 A 100 24 7000 00000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 187 590 67 844 37.0 D 23.9 C 23.2 C 26.7 C 150 10922402 % 382 2133942 %0000WB 90 400 325 815 31.3 C 14.6 B 13.5 B 15.9 B 25.4 C 200 54 12700390 121 28800 000NB 20 70 14 104 40.9 D 42.4 D 27.2 C 40.1 D 50 2072024 % 438 60 13100 000SB 393 89 171 653 39.7 D 31.4 C 18.6 B 33.1 C 590 202 424 1 % 1 %0124 26600 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB0963 34 9970.0 010.1 B 6.8 A 10.0 B00005 % 390 13037419 %0000WB081508150.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 8.2 A00000 00000 000NB00183 1830.0 032.2 D 32.2 D00000 00000295 90259SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0742 403 1,1450.0 025.8 C 12.3 B 21.0 C00000152169 209007593 193WB 439 57801,017 45.1 D 16.2 B0.0 028.8 C 25.6 C0000037832248400 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 385 72 237 694 37.3 D 41.8 D 11.0 B 28.7 C 500 117 226001106 168 28000300 58 15850th St & NB TH 100 EB0727 400 1,1270.0 01.7 A 4.6 A 2.7 A00000 00000 000WB01017 617 1,6340.0 04.0 A 5.2 A 4.5 A 3.8 A00000171 25 14502 % 2527 58NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB0727 4 7310.0 00.6 A 0.3 A 0.6 A00000342 20 2000 000WB 192 144701,639 8.0 A 0.8 A0.0 01.7 A 1.9 A 120 521140032702000 000NB00203 2030.0 00.4 A 8.6 A 8.3 A00000242 51 14000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 4 3810385 4.1 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 100 20 300063502000 000WB0391 3 3940.0 00.8 A 0.5 A 0.8 A 0.9 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00330.0 0 0.0 04.2 A 4.2 A00000345 20 2000 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 3 263 115 381 4.2 A 1.8 A 0.6 A 1.5 A00000140 20 7100 000WB 161 336 3 500 8.2 A 3.4 A 1.4 A 4.9 A 6.5 A00000676613000 000NB 560159 215 48.3E0.0 08.2 A 18.8 C 320 41 17700 00000100 38135SB 402 6 25.8 D0.0 09.7 A 20.4 C00000239 20 2000 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 52 324 50 426 2.2 A 3.1 A 2.1 A 2.9 A0000067 297300 000WB 47 311 100 458 3.7 A 4.6 A 4.1 A 4.4 A 4.1 A0000082 5015200 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 67 74 16 157 4.2 A 5.2 A 4.0 A 4.7 A00000642 30 8100 000SB 16 49 122 187 4.6 A 5.0 A 5.4 A 5.2 A00000156 38 10700 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 57017 74 6.6 A0.0 01.4 A 5.5 A 1.1 A 340 29 5900 00000 000NB024602460.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 6300 000SB012201220.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A00000 00000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 2002 10.6 B0.0 0 0.0 010.6 B00000261 20 2400 000WB 15022 37 7.7 A0.0 06.6 A 7.0 A 0.8 A00000235 22 4800 000NB 1 222 10 233 1.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A 0.1 A000002002000 000SB 4 174 1 179 1.7 A 0.3 A 0.2 A 0.3 A000002020 3800 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 7007 9.6 A0.0 0 0.0 09.6 A00000268 20 3600 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.6 A00000 00000 000NB 1 2260227 2.3 A 0.5 A0.0 00.5 A0000015602000 000SB0187 2 1890.0 00.4 A 0.6 A 0.4 A000002002000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 197 2360433 3.7 A 5.3 A0.0 04.6 A00000700 34 13300 000WB0260 109 3690.0 03.0 A 5.3 A 3.6 A 3.9 A0000079 4912500 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1500255 405 3.5 A 1.4 A 3.7 A 3.5 A0000080 4215300 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 150 225 386 1.2 A 1.6 A 1.3 A 1.4 A0000079 207000 000WB 44 147 5 196 3.0 A 4.3 A 3.5 A 4.0 A 2.4 A00000314 25 8000 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 217048 265 3.2 A0.0 03.2 A 3.2 A00000432 27 7700 000SB 505 10 2.6 A 0.3 A 3.3 A 0.7 A00000349 20 2400 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 1820322 504 12.8 B0.0 02.7 A 6.4 A 320 59 14300 00000200 20 109WB00440.0 0 0.0 03.9 A 3.9 A 4.0 A00000159 20 2600 000NB 161 143 2 306 1.9 A 1.3 A 0.5 A 1.5 A0000080 218600 000SB084 5 890.0 00.4 A 0.6 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2500 000Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)AM Peak Hour Grandview Yard2042 Build Conditions - Realigned Wilson Rd, Mini-Roundabouts at Eden/Grange and Eden/WilsonAM & PM Peak HoursL T R Total L LOS T LOS R LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSDelay(S/Veh)LOSStorage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockThru (2)---->% BlockLeft (2)<----Link Length(feet)Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1% BlockRight (2)---->% BlockThru (2)<----Storage(feet) 3Avg.Queue(feet) 1MaxQueue(feet) 1Vehicle Queing Information (feet)Right Turn LaneIntersectionApproachDemand Volumes Delay (s/veh)LOS ByApproachLOS ByIntersectionLeft Turn Lane Through Lane (s)Vernon Ave at Eden Ave (Signal) EB 2 11 5 18 15.0 B 22.3 C 4.5 A 15.9 B 50 20 2001 % 356 20 5300 000WB 237 4 171 412 25.9 C 7.9 A 12.3 B 20.0 C 18.6 B 1009814901 % 635 88 28600 000NB 2 967 299 1,268 38.2 D 24.0 C 6.3 A 20.0 C 100 20 21031 % 379 2133844 %0250 83302SB 113 522 7 642 26.8 C 12.7 B 8.0 A 15.0 B 145 5813101 % 792 91 182 1 %0000Vernon Ave at Gus Young Ln EB 13 13 13 39 30.3 D 37.6E5.7 A 24.2 C00000204 20 61 3 %050 20 41WB 79 13 68 160 38.3E48.3E19.8 C 30.9 D 6.9 A00000418 64 166 25 % 8 % 504498NB 10 1062 65 1,137 9.0 A 4.6 A 4.0 A 4.6 A 100 20 2801 % 792 20 10500140020SB 58 481 29 568 17.1 C 1.8 A 1.6 A 3.5 A 100 32910038202000 000Vernon Ave at Interlachen Blvd (Signal) EB 307 809 39 1,155 55.2E25.2 C 22.9 C 33.1 C 150191 22906 % 382 2464066 %0000WB 93 443 396 932 39.8 D 21.4 C 21.7 C 23.3 C 37.3 D 200 65 13801 % 390 1863531 %0000NB 31 122 35 188 64.9E56.0E44.9 D 55.4E50 3097048 % 438 127 30900 000SB 448 85 104 637 69.2E49.3 D 31.1 C 60.3E590 3177385 % 1 %0162 27500 000Vernon Ave & Arcadia Ave EB01251 41 1,2920.0 08.2 A 6.4 A 8.1 A00006 % 390 12435614 %0000WB093209320.0 01.2 A0.0 01.2 A 8.0 A0000015202000 000NB00195 1950.0 041.1E41.1E00000 00000295 113281SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Vernon Ave/50th & SB TH 100 (Signal) EB0973 474 1,4470.0 022.5 C 11.6 B 18.9 B00000152175 213007596 184WB 344 5520896 64.2E21.4 C0.0 038.2 D 30.5 C0000037832648800 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 689 85 380 1,154 49.3 D 62.5E17.4 B 39.5 D 500 251432001106 298 489 9 %0300 12938450th St & NB TH 100 EB01315 347 1,6620.0 02.2 A 5.0 A 2.8 A0000037802000 000WB0896 353 1,2490.0 03.4 A 2.8 A 3.2 A 3.0 A00000171 20 121 1 %025 2043NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 00050th St & Eden Ave EB01411 9 1,4200.0 01.0 A 0.8 A 1.0 A00000342 20 2200 000WB 138 91701,055 20.4 C 0.4 A0.0 03.0 A 6.4 A 120 6214500327 20 8100 000NB00258 2580.0 06.0 A 51.9F50.5F00000242 14531400 000SB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000Eden Ave & Brookside Ave EB 2 3990401 3.5 A 1.0 A0.0 01.0 A 1000200063502000 000WB0377 22 3990.0 00.4 A 0.2 A 0.4 A 1.1 A00000 00000 000NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 25014 39 11.7 B0.0 04.0 A 9.1 A00000345 20 4700 000Eden Ave & OLG Entrance EB 3 405 16 424 10.5 B 1.5 A 0.4 A 1.5 A00000140 20 8100 000WB 18 384 4 406 4.9 A 0.8 A 0.4 A 0.9 A 1.7 A0000067 208600 000NB 11019 30 12.7 B0.0 011.7 B 12.0 B 320 20 2600 00000100 20 36SB 604 10 16.9 C0.0 03.5 A 11.5 B00000239 20 2800 000Eden Ave & Arcadia Ave EB 70 307 53 430 3.3 A 3.9 A 3.1 A 3.7 A0000067 377600 000WB 52 184 111 347 3.0 A 3.3 A 3.0 A 3.2 A 3.7 A0000082 369600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 85 95 10 190 4.4 A 5.0 A 3.6 A 4.7 A00000642 29 8700 000SB 33 118 137 288 3.7 A 3.5 A 3.6 A 3.6 A00000156 34 9500 000Arcadia Ave & SB TH 100 EB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000WB 39027 66 7.2 A0.0 01.3 A 5.0 A 0.8 A 340 21 6400 00000 000NB023702370.0 00.2 A0.0 00.2 A000002020 5600 000SB024102410.0 00.4 A0.0 00.4 A00000588 20 2000 000Arcadia Ave & Restaurant Lot Driveway EB 15028 43 9.1 A0.0 03.7 A 5.6 A00000261 26 5700 000WB 10014 24 7.2 A0.0 04.4 A 5.4 A 0.9 A00000235 20 4800 000NB 43 208 27 278 1.7 A 0.2 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 3600 000SB 11 254 15 280 1.5 A 0.2 A 0.2 A 0.3 A000002020 3100 000Arcadia Ave & Senior Living East DrivewaEB 6006 8.4 A0.0 0 0.0 08.4 A00000268 20 3300 000WB00000.000.000.000.0 A 0.7 A00000 00000 000NB 4 2720276 2.3 A 0.9 A0.0 00.9 A00000156 20 5500 000SB0288 4 2920.0 00.4 A 0.1 A 0.4 A000002020 2000 000Eden Ave & Grange Rd EB 147 2560403 4.5 A 5.5 A0.0 05.1 A00000700 33 14300 000WB0198 177 3750.0 02.5 A 2.8 A 2.6 A 3.5 A0000079 3410600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB00000.000.000.000.0 A00000 00000 000SB 1660179 345 2.9 A 1.4 A 2.9 A 2.8 A0000080 2811700 000Eden Ave & Willson Rd/City Hall EB 11 174 237 422 1.4 A 2.0 A 1.7 A 1.8 A0000079 207900 000WB 55 87 5 147 3.7 A 4.3 A 3.3 A 4.0 A 3.0 A00000314 22 7600 000MINI ROUNDABOUT NB 265077 342 4.0 A0.0 03.9 A 4.0 A00000432 31 10900 000SB 5023 28 4.1 A0.0 03.7 A 3.8 A00000349 20 3600 000Grange Rd & NB TH 100 EB 2650254 519 28.6 D0.0 04.0 A 16.6 C 320 114 26700 00000200 29192WB0043 430.0 0 0.0 07.8 A 7.8 A 9.6 A00000159 23 5900 000NB 120 202 2 324 3.0 A 2.1 A 0.9 A 2.4 A0000080 3011100 000SB091 5 960.0 00.4 A 0.7 A 0.4 A00000180 20 2000 000NOTES1. If the reported queue is greater than zero (0), but less than ft, a minimum of ft is reported.2. Block Percentage is proportion of analysis time (1 hour) the storage lane or through lane is blocked or blocking.3. Multiple storage lanes of different length are averaged together to show the "Effective Storage Length" per lane.PM Peak Hour Memo To: Cary Teague From: Ed Terhaar, PE City of Edina File: 193806380 Date: July 20, 2023 Reference: Traffic and Parking Review for Eden 100 Development in Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: July 20, 2023 Edward Terhaar License No. 24441 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND This memorandum documents our traffic and parking review for the proposed redevelopment project located at 5100 Eden Avenue. The project will consist of removing the existing office building and constructing a new mixed use apartment and retail building with an underground parking ramp. Access for the project will be provided at two locations on Arcadia Avenue, with the south access for the parking ramp and the north access for the service area. For purpose of this review, the current proposed project is assumed to consist of the following uses: • 136 apartment dwelling units • 3,364 square foot coffee shop • Underground parking ramp with 183 parking stalls A full traffic and parking study was completed in August 2022 for the Grandview Yard development located on the west side of Arcadia Avenue. This study accounted for 138 apartment dwelling units on the 5100 Eden Avenue site but did not include the coffee shop. The current traffic and parking review compares the trip generation and parking demand to the results presented in the previous study. TRAFFIC REVIEW Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the eleventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates for the development assumed in the Grandview Yard study are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Weekday Trip Generation for 5100 Eden Avenue as Presented in the Grandview Yard Study Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Apartments 138 DU 12 39 51 33 21 54 627 DU=dwelling units Cary Teague City of Edina July 20, 2023 The resultant trip generation estimates for the current project are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Weekday Trip Generation for Current Proposed Project at 5100 Eden Avenue Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Uses Apartments 136 DU 12 38 50 32 21 53 617 Coffee Shop 3,364 SF 120 115 235 41 41 82 1115 Subtotal 132 153 285 73 62 135 1732 Current Use (removed) Office 38,000 SF (51) (7) (58) (9) (46) (55) (412) Net Total 81 146 227 64 16 80 1320 SF=square feet, DU=dwelling units As shown, the existing office use generates 58 trips during the a.m. peak hour, 55 trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 412 weekday daily trips. Traffic Operations The traffic forecasts and analyses presented in the Grandview Yard Traffic Study were updated to account for the current development plan for 5100 Eden Avenue. All other parameters of the study remained the same, including the proposed Grandview Yard development and future roadway system modifications. The operational analysis was updated using Synchro/SimTraffic software for the study interse ctions. The updated analysis indicated the study intersections operate at acceptable levels during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours during the future build conditions. The overall results are similar to the results presented in the Grandview Yard Traffic Study. In the short term scenario, intersections operate at level of service (LOC) C or better with some movements operating at LOS D. In the long term scenario, the development traffic adds delays for a few approaches that reach LOS E, but all intersection s operate at a LOS D or better. Overall, the intersection analysis results with the current development plan for 5100 Eden Avenue are similar to those presented in the Grandview Yard Traffic Study. As concluded in that study and the current review, the surrounding roadway system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development in this area. The capacity of a two lane roadway is approximately 15,000 vehicles per day. The daily volume on Arcadia Avenue after full development of the area is estimated at 7,400 vehicles per day. This equates to approximately 49.3 percent of the total capacity of the roadway. PARKING REVIEW The project includes a total of 183 parking stalls in the parking ramp. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 5th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site is 176 spaces, which occurs between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m. The total of 183 spaces provided is 7 spaces greater than the peak demand. The proposed number of parking stalls adequately accommodates the peak parking demand. Cary Teague City of Edina July 20, 2023 The current Edina City code requires 14 parking spaces for the retail use and 170 parking spaces for the apartment units, for a total requirement of 184 spaces. The total of 183 spaces provided is 1 space less than the City code requirement. The code also includes a parking space reduction section which allows for a 10 percent reduction for providing covered and long term bicycle parking. Applying this reduction results in a total requirement of 166 spaces. Under this scenario, the total of 183 spaces provided is 17 spaces greater than the City code requirement. CONCLUSIONS The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The traffic operations for the short term and long term scenarios with the current development plan for 5100 Eden Avenue are similar to those presented in the Grandview Yard Traffic Study. As concluded in that study and the current review, the surrounding roadway system has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed development in this area. • The following recommendations from the Grandview Yard Traffic Study are affirmed: o The Vernon Avenue/Arcadia Avenue intersection should be monitored as development occurs to determine if any operations or queuing concerns arise. o Signal timing adjustments along Vernon Avenue may be needed to accommodate future traffic volumes. • Based on ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site is 176 spaces, which occurs between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m. The total of 183 spaces provided is 7 spaces greater than the peak demand. • The current Edina City code requires 14 parking spaces for the retail use and 170 parking spaces for the apartment units, for a total requirement of 184 spaces. The total of 183 spaces provided is 1 space less than the City code requirement. The code also includes a parking space reduction section which allows for a 10 percent reduction for providing covered and long term bicycle parking. Applying this reduction results in a total requirement of 166 spaces . Under this scenario, the total of 183 spaces provided is 17 spaces greater than the City code requirement. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. | 10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343 | 952.656.4444 | www.opus-group.com EDEN 100 – DEVELOPMENT DESIGN VISION 21 June 2023 GRANDVIEW VITALITY The primary goal of the proposed 1.36 acre P.U.D. development is to provide the level of vitality that this prominent site deserves. The site is currently an underutilized office building connecting Edina’s pedestrian friendly area of Grandview to the surrounding community. Enhancing the vibrancy of this site will contribute to the liveliness of Grandview as a whole. A mix of residential and commercial uses will attract more activity to the site while generating streets full of life to the greater Grandview area. MIX OF USES A mix of uses, both public and private will foster an active streetscape during the day and evening. A two-story parking garage has been buried into the hill creating building edges lined with active residential and commercial/retail uses to promote pedestrian activity at the street level. This is done thoughtfully in response to context of today and the future development of the greater Grandview Framework plan. The northwest corner of the project massing steps down to a single-story expression of commercial space opening up to the future Grandview Yards public space responding to future and existing context. 3,000 square feet of commercial/retail will cater to the visitors, residents and employees of local offices and institutions immediately adjacent to the site. On-site public garage parking will be provided for up to 10 stalls per 1,000 SF allowing for a mix of uses and flexibility of tenant profiles in this space. Retail and active amenity frontage is provided on the 3 street facing sides with the east side of the project providing walk-up townhome-style apartment homes in response to the Framework plans design for this type of streetscape experience. The project includes a total of 136 apartments, in a 7 story U-shaped building form which erodes and opens to views into Grandview. 10% of the units will be affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The lobby for residential use anchors the Eden & Arcadia corner. This prominent location takes advantage of the large Right-of-Way yard on the south along Eden, and steps down to the street level enhancing visibility and activity along the street. The current walls that have been installed by the city for the traffic circle can be dismantled and returned to the city for future use elsewhere in the area. The first story above the parking structure will deliver shared resident amenity spaces, including an attractively landscaped outdoor deck which will provide visible connection and openness to Arcadia and the park. Apartments will range in size from studios to two plus bedroom units, catering to young professionals, millennials, Edina residents and empty nesters in search of an active lifestyle residence in the Edina Grandview market. PUBLIC AMENITIES + RESPONSIVENESS TO GRANDVIEW PLAN Care has been taken in the development of this plan to respond to both the important Grandview Framework Plan as well as feedback provided by City stakeholders through the Sketch Plan process, immediate neighbors, neighborhood meetings and City Staff. The Framework plan conceived of a promenade running along the west side of Arcadia connecting 50th & Vernon to Eden Avenue. While this promenade has not materialized as expected with standard street sections and rowhomes, we are proposing to revitalize that vision to spark future extensions as the Framework plan is further realized to the north. A 10’ wide ‘Arcadia Art Walk’ featuring public community art is envisioned extending from our Northwest corner to the Southwest corner running along the east side of Arcadia. In addition to providing land for an expanded Arcadia section including street parking and landscaped boulevards; we are also proposing a grand 10-foot-wide walkway lined with active uses. Starting at the Northwest corner, a commercial/retail space including outdoor patio will engage the street. Terracing down the hill at midblock a public park is planned with an art installation opportunity to engage the street. Finally at the southwest corner the active frontage is a full story down at the Eden | Arcadia traffic circle level presenting the apartment lobby and work from home amenity to anchor and activate this gateway into Grandview. One could imagine as new developments are realized to the north the wide ‘Art Walk’ sidewalk could be extended including future art installation opportunities. In addition to the ‘Art Walk’ and public park, the project proposes a gracious 8-foot-wide publicly accessible loop sidewalk along the entire east and north edges of the parcel to provide a more comfortable and level pedestrian and bicycle connection from the west edge of Eden Ave. Bridge to local commercial establishments in central Grandview such as Hilltop and future Grandview Yards. This sidewalk will be activated with townhome-style walk-up units, walk-out resident amenities, public bike repair fixit station and commercial/retail space for a comfortable and inviting experience while eliminating the need to go down the Eden hill just to go up the Arcadia hill which wraps our site. Finally, the project proposes to improve the Eden sidewalk experience as well. The extra wide landscape zone for grade change and existing narrow walkway is difficult to navigate along the steep slope. The project proposes to ease this experience with a meandering and gracious 8-foot-wide walkway, expanded landscape boulevard separating pedestrian from vehicles, benches for resting along the path and lush flattened landscaping at street level along the slope. PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED ENVIRONMENT Contextual architecture and landscape design based on long-standing urban design principles will create a welcoming public environment that will attract pedestrian activity and encourage residents to go out and enjoy the city. In addition to increasing the energy on site, key design features will foster the goal of multi-modal transportation revitalizing an overwhelmingly auto-oriented environment: - The building massing responds to the context, with the tallest massing on the east and south similar to adjacent approved developments, and the scale of the building steps down towards the north and west opening up to and engaging Grandview. - The perimeter of the site is fully lined with attractive architecture and active uses, in ways that respond to the specific context of each particular street including existing conditions as well as responding to the future development of the Grandview framework plan street network. - Attractive outdoor spaces are provided adjacent to both the lobby and commercial/retail space. - The amount of curb cuts is minimized, and no curb cuts are located on Eden Avenue. - The vision of a pedestrian-oriented fabric along Arcadia and Eden is enhanced to facilitate connection to mass transit, City Hall and the greater Grandview mixed-use village. ADDITIONAL DETAILS On-Site Resident Parking 148 Stalls (1.09 / unit) On-Site Commercial Parking 35 Stalls (10 / 1,000 SF + staff) Building Height to Roof 76’ above AGP (Average Grade Plane 928.86’) Building Ht. compared to Jerry’s Office Approx. 7.5’ below Jerry’s Roof Deck Proposed Setbacks (all frontages) 10 Feet Affordable Housing 10% of units at 50% AMI On-Site Vehicle Charging Stations 10.9% EV Stalls Provided (20 total) 5.5% (10 stalls) capable EDEN 100 – PROJECT INFORMATION 21 June 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERING NARRATIVE The Eden 100 project grade design accommodates fifteen feet of fall across the site by providing two building floor elevations with ground access to the street elevation. The lowest floor level at the southwest side of the building is at 921.5 and includes the apartment lobby and amenity area. The higher floor elevation of 935 is located at the northwest side of the building where the retail and patio space is located. In between these two floor elevations is a loading zone, an art park and the entrance to the below grade parking level. The grading plan also accommodates a sidewalk route along the east and north sides of the building at a moderate slope in lieu of a path down Eden Avenue and rising back up again along Arcadia Avenue. The utility design for Eden 100 includes utilizing existing sewer and water access points on Eden and Arcadia Avenue to avoid disturbing the newly constructed pavements. The design also includes an underground stormwater system at the west side of the building to address rate, volume, and treatment requirements. The site will improve the stormwater discharged downstream, since the existing office building site does not have any stormwater treatment. The site access will be primarily at the west side below grade entrance, so vehicles will no longer access Eden Avenue and impact the vehicular movements to the Highway 100 on ramp. The below grade parking, accessed from Arcadia, will accommodate public, private, and accessible parking needs. SUSTAINABILITY APPROACH As part of our P.U.D. request the development will be required to participate in the newly instituted Sustainable Building Policy. At this time, we intend to pursue Fitwell and National Green Building Standard (NGBS) rating systems however we are continuing to measure this quickly changing certification environment. Should our certification path change between P.U.D. approval and Building Permit submittal we will work with the City to confirm we meet or exceed the Edina Sustainability Building Policy. In addition, we are proposing to install approximately 11% EV stalls upon initial occupancy of the project exceeding Edina Policy with stall capability for another 5-6%. We will meet bird safe glazing requirements as prescribed in the policy. NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH The development team has been actively reaching out for feedback from many local area stakeholders including City Sketch Plan process and feedback (April/May), Immediate Neighbors (Our Lady of Grace, Hilltop, Jester Concepts), and a neighborhood meeting of residents within 1,000 feet were invited to a June 7th presentation. All meetings were very positive and a few of our immediate neighbors have provided letters of support for our proposed development which accompany this submittal package. EDEN 100 – SKETCH PLAN COMMENT RESPONSES 21 June 2023 Below is a summary of the comment themes we heard through City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff during the Sketch Plan Process. DOES NOT SEEM LIKE THERE IS JUSTIFICATION FOR P.U.D. WHAT IS DEVELOPMENT GIVING TO CITY? Response: Please refer to the attached P.U.D. Guiding Principles document along with our commented alignment. PROJECT IS TOO CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINES. Response: Revisions to the design have been made to provide a minimum 10’ setback on all frontages aligning with recently approved P.U.D. projects near our site, notably Maison Green directly across Hwy 100. Note that efforts have been made to exceed these setbacks whenever possible with average setbacks in excess of the 10’ metric. Arcadia (West) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 36’-10” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 42’-10” Eden (South) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 13’-10” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 46’-1” Hwy 100 (East) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 21’-6” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: N/A MnDOT Ramp (North) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 11’ - 4” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 27’-8” NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS DEVELOPMENT DENSITY IMPACTS TRAFFIC. Response: City Staff has engaged a traffic consultant to review traffic impacts. At the time of this submittal the report is outstanding. Initial expectations are the proposed development impact will be negligible from a performance standard. BUILDING TOO BIG ON SITE, PREFER TALLER MASSING ALONG SOUTH (EDEN) AND EAST (HWY 100) Response: The design team has reworked the plan extensively to reduce the scale and size of the building presence on the street. In addition to increased setbacks noted above, the design now includes a fully buried parking structure (previously mostly above), nearly 100% active frontages on all sides including walkouts units, amenity deck opening and engaging Arcadia (previously a story above street level), Massing includes large stepbacks (previously none) specifically stepbacks at NW corner for a single story retail expression and receding steps greater than 30 feet at levels 2 and 6 opening up to Grandview proper, eliminating one curb cut on Eden and including internal ramping for better pedestrian safety and walkability around site, lighter material colors to create an airy feel and focused tall density on south and east aligning with approved developments along Eden. REFER TO FRAMEWORK PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES Response: Please refer to the attached Framework Guiding Principles document with our commented alignments. VERY VISIBLE PROJECT, BE CREATIVE TO CREATE A UNIQUE SPACE, PAGE 18 OF FRAMEWORK PLAN Response: Please refer to Development Design Vision including added Public Park, ‘Arcadia Art Walk’, expansive sidewalks and plantings, nearly 100% active frontages, commercial space, amenity street engagement and planning with future in mind. EDEN 100 – Planned Unit Development District Guiding Principles 21 June 2023 Per Sec. 36-253 the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following. Below we have responded to each standard to clarify how our proposed project aligns with these guiding principles. A. Provide for the establishment of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district in appropriate setting and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Response: The City’s Comprehensive Plan has designated this site in the Grandview District which is planned to be a Mixed-Use Center. The Mixed Use Center designation aligns with our proposed vertically mixed-use project. Comp. Plan primary uses are proposed as retail, office, service, multi-family residential and institutional uses which also aligns with our proposed multi-family residential and commercial uses. Comp. Plan Development character and guidelines include creating new pedestrian and streetscape amenities which are provided on all sides of our project including a park along Arcadia and art walk. Encourage structured parking which is provided in our subterranean garage. Buildings may step down in height at intersections. As suggested in Sketch Plan by Planning Committee and City Council the Density is preserved at the East and South facades. The building has substantial step backs allowing the building to “step down” at the Arcadia and Highway 100 off-ramp as we transition to the public park at Grandview Yards and Hilltop. Density Guidance 20-100 units per acre. The project proposes to meet and not exceed 100 units per acre based on this complying standard. B. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetic, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and views to the future fully built Grandview District. In addition, public amenities have been added including the re-envisioning of the Arcadia promenade, Page 18 of framework plan, into a public amenity including a park, outdoor seating patios and commercial lobby spaces which engage and re-engage the pedestrian as they come to live, work and play around our site. The north and east boundaries will provide a more convenient, and less physical way to move about the area without having to traverse a hill down to just go back up to enjoy the central Arcadia commercial area. Our bike valet is located in relation to the future pedestrian and bike bridge connecting regional trails and access to City Hall. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future. C. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City’s standards to offset the effects of any variations. Desired design elements may include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. Response: The proposed project is requesting relief from the strict application of land use regulations in certain areas including setbacks, Building Height, Building Coverage and F.A.R. The proposed benefits being provided back to the city in exchange for the above relief includes: a. Removal of podium design and provision to add active frontage on all frontages, including removal of street wall podium conditions as requested during sketch plan by burying and concealing the garage. b. Improvement of stormwater to modern Best Management Practices. Currently no treatment on site. c. Pedestrian oriented design on all facades including publicly accessible sidewalks on all frontages, a pedestrian loop walk along the north and east, wider than City standard walkways in all locations, including a 10-foot-wide art walk along Arcadia and a public park with potential art installation, improvement and site amenities such as benches on Eden and bike repair station for public use. d. Providing additional private land to accommodate the widening of Arcadia to update the street section as well as the Arcadia | Eden traffic Circle encroachment into the property. We also propose to dismantle and provide back to the city, if they desire, the new retaining wall and railing for use elsewhere in the city. D. Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Response: The project has been meticulously sculpted to relate in density and scale with the surrounding context. Greater setbacks have been provided than originally proposed and aligning with projects such as Maison Green’s 10’ setback. This will provide a consistent theme in the area and in most cases, we exceed, sometimes substantially, this minimum setback. The Eden and Highway 100 frontages have higher density which match currently planned, existing and future buildings along the Eden corridor. The project then steps down and away opening up a courtyard to arcadia and views into the central Grandview area relating well to any future development to the North. The North and East facades have been planned with a loop walk to provide active frontage, distance to property lines and flexibility for the future Framework plan street grid as well. E. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. Response: A traffic memo is being prepared and at this time we do not plan to increase or worsen the efficiency of local public streets. Our usage patterns are more spread out throughout the day vs. rush hour times when traffic is heaviest. Site stormwater will be brought up to modern standards significantly improving the current conditions. F. Preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening. Response: The proposed solution has been intentionally designed to open up to Grandview and provide scenic views over the district and into the planned amenity courtyard. The natural topography has been extensively included in the design solution with all street frontages maintaining active uses and terracing to interact with pedestrians as they traverse the steep slopes surrounding our site. We have also proposed to provide a loop walk and bikeway on the east and north to allow for more comfortable connections from the Eden Bridge and the Arcadia commercial district. G. Allow for mixing of land uses within a development. Response: The project is proposing a vertically integrated mixed-use solution of multi-family and commercial space both with structured and ordinance compliant parking. H. Encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing. Response: The project will provide 10% affordable housing at 50% AMI per City standards for a P.U.D. I. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Response: The project edges along Arcadia and Eden both have very wide yards allowing for comfortable transition of a denser project such as this. The pedestrian experience will be supremely enhanced and where future planned development may happen to the north, the project has established 10-foot setbacks to be flexible for future development and relief at the streetscape. EDEN 100 – GRANDVIEW FRAMEWORK PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES 21 June 2023 THE 7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1 Leverage publicly - owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. Response: Our proposed development is a direct result of the City’s pursuit and execution of this guiding principle. The energy created by the development of the Public Works Site to Senior living and Restaurant with park amenities as well as the pedestrian link to the Jerry’s parking structure has spurred our interest and desire to pursue private development within Grandview area proper. Our development is meant to be integrated and a catalyst for additional development in the area. 2 Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and resident will make the District a good place to do business. Response: The proposed development and density is responding directly to this principle. Increased homes for a variety of income levels and family sizes, add vitality and energy to the district, including patronage to the immediate restaurants and offices in the central business district of Grandview. Adding commercial/retail space to the proposed project only increases and adds to the variety of options available to all creating a destination where people want to live, work and play. 3 Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. Response: The local infrastructure has been methodically improved by the city including the Eden | Arcadia traffic Circle, additional traffic circles being installed near City Hall, public parking with pedestrian bridge and below ground utilities. The proposed project takes advantage of the local infrastructure capacity and does not inundate it. In addition, the proposed project uniquely works with the natural topography stepping down and re-engaging pedestrians at all elevations and frontages. Stormwater quality will be captured, filtered and slowed upon release into the public system as required by modern practices which the site does not currently adhere to. 4 Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life-filled place. Response: Framework plans are exceptional tools to spark development and are created with the mindset that they are not fixed designs but founded in principles such as these to guide development which can respond to the market and future needs of cities. While our project may not look and feel exactly like the vision images in the Framework plan it aligns well with these principles and development patterns of today and in the immediate vicinity of our site. In addition, care has been taken to design for the present and future including the burying of the parking structure and nearly complete activation of all frontages of the building. These moves activate Eden and Arcadia today with public and private amenities in the present while offering walkout units and amenities for residents of the future along our future planned North and East Framework plan streets. The publicly accessible sidewalk loop on the East and North edge of parcel is the first installation of these future streets and we look forward to working with City to connect to the future street grid and pedestrian/bike bridge over 100. We articulate many of the advantages of the proposed design in our Development Design Vision narrative. We are excited to add to a vibrant and life-filled space with greater density of households and supporting the local economy. 5 Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. Response: The proposed project will be one of many beneficiaries of the Jerry’s garage pedestrian link for our mixed uses. In addition, the project is providing additional land along Arcadia for convenient on-street parking as well as enclosed, structured parking for our commercial use on site. The apartments will also be fully parked per ordinance on site in a garage that is hidden from view providing additional greens space, setbacks and a public park. 6 Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. Response: We fully support multi-modal forms of transportation. The project is close to the minimum ordinance parking requirement and aligned when taking guest and future resident parking into mind. This encourages our residents to use one of the 10 bus stops located within a ¼ mile of our front door. Ubers, secure bike parking, repair stations, dog and bike wash amenities with street access encourage our residents to use other forms of transportation beyond a car when enjoying the district. This approach allows the development the opportunity to house people, not cars and activate the street frontages to the greatest extent possible. It is worth noting, should our residents choose to have a car we plan to provide 20 Electric Vehicle stalls upon opening with the opportunity to add as future demand grows, reducing emissions in the increasingly pedestrian friendly District. 7 Create and identity of unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and provides views to the future fully built Grandview District. In addition, public amenities have been added including the re-envisioning of the Arcadia promenade, Page 18 of framework plan, into a public amenity including a park, outdoor seating patios and commercial lobby spaces which engage and re- engage pedestrians as they come to live, work and play around our site. The north and east boundaries will provide a more convenient, and less physical way to move about the area without having to traverse a hill down to just go back up to enjoy the central Arcadia commercial area. Our bike valet is located in relation to the future pedestrian and bike bridge connecting regional trails and access to City Hall. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future. EDEN 100 – SOUTHDALE DESIGN EXPEIRENCE GUIDELINES 21 June 2023 Mayor Hovland requested we review and respond to Southdale Design Experience Guidelines, see below for the guidelines and how our project could contribute to these guidelines in the Grandview area. 1 Imagine Greater Southdale District evolution organized around human activity, with vibrant pedestrian-focused streets, beautiful parks and public spaces, and endearing and enduring buildings. Response: As noted in the Development Design Vision and Grandview Framework Guiding Principles the pedestrian experience has been a primary focus to inform the design result. Expanded sidewalks beyond City minimums, private property dedicated to the public benefit of a public park and pedestrian pathway embellishment to help the site endure the test of time and plan for the future. 2 Make the Greater Southdale District the model of healthy urban living. Response: Refer specifically to Grandview Framework Guiding Principle #6 response provided. We have designed to encourage multi-modal transportation, mitigate emissions by exceeding EV charging positions, and taking local infrastructure and landscaping into account. In addition, we intend to pursue FitWel certification which is a leading certification system committed to building health for all. 3 Invent sustainable infrastructure matching the district’s sense of innovation. Response: The design has taken care to perpetuate an enlivened District including pedestrian comfort, safety and convenience. It offers a planned connection not only for the present but also for the future framework vision. The roadway infrastructure improvements have been well planned and recently installed by the City which has capacity for the increase in development density across Grandview. 4 Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district. Response: A true vertically mixed-use project will provide a smaller more flexible commercial use compared to the larger sit down restaurant concepts currently planned and built in the immediate vicinity. The proposed development will tie nicely into the village fabric providing additional patrons to the district while also bringing a unique and different market position for a commercial or retail use. 5 Offer a spectrum of living opportunities integrated through the district. Response: The proposed project also provides increased housing types west of highway 100 which currently is made of up senior apartments and planned senior co-op units. Our proposal will include market rate housing for a multitude of family types while also including a number of affordable housing units. 6 Expand significantly the number and extent of parks and public spaces. Response: As noted in other narrative sections the project works in concert with the Grandview Framework plan guiding principles. While it does not recreate the exact vision but one that is present and based on present conditions and changes from recent approvals in the area. Our proposed development includes additional sidewalk width to provide an Arcadia Art Walk which can be expanded in the future. This concept was planned for the west side of Arcadia but did not materialize. In addition, we have added public commercial patios and a public park to provide respite and additional softening of the surrounding built environment adding to the park and publics spaces inventory of the District. 7 Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience. Response: The project has evolved to fully met the intent of a guideline such as this. Burying the parking garage, activating all frontages, even where streets do not exist but are planned in the future and providing relief and access. The parcel sits on an island due to its location and size however it will easily blend into the future of the district as it evolves. 8 Build (or plan for) a street network encouraging pedestrian movement across and through the district. Response: The Grandview Framework plan has a great vision for the future street network surrounding this site. The elimination and simplification of the Highway 100 on and off ramps will improve the walkability and accessibility of the district. Safe and welcoming pedestrian conditions will be created and as noted in guideline 7 above our proposed solution will evolve well with the future. We have worked closely with staff to accommodate surrounding future improvements. 9 Imagine transportation in the district. Response: We fully support multi-modal forms of transportation. The project is close to the minimum ordinance parking requirement and aligned when taking guest and future resident parking into mind. This encourages our residents to use one of the 10 bus stops located within a ¼ mile of our front door. Ubers, secure bike parking, repair stations, dog and bike wash amenities with street access encourage our residents to use other forms of transportation beyond a car when enjoying the district. This approach allows the development the opportunity to house people, not cars and activate the street frontages to the greatest extent possible. It is worth noting should our residents chose to have a car we plan to provide 20 Electric Vehicle stalls installed upon opening with the opportunity to add as future demand grows reducing emissions in the increasingly pedestrian friendly District. 10 Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and views to the future fully built Grandview District. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future along with all the adjacent developments present now and the future. 11 Frame development guidance for evolution. Response: The planning of this parcel as been carefully sculpted to accommodate the future village fabric of the District. Future street networks and expanded public walkways and infrastructure are all carefully considered and executed at a cost to our project but for the benefit of the current and future District. EDEN 100 – P.O.D. Building Design + Construction Standards 11 July 2023 Director Teague provided insight regarding staff requesting to add P.O.D. Design + Construction conditions when applying for P.U.D. Below is a summary of these standards and our response to each in compliance and/or justification. A. All new front building facades in the district that face the public realm must have 75 percent transparency (ability to see inside the building) at the ground level. Response: Due to the challenging topography and stepped design necessary to activate street frontages we are stepping transparency zones between Level 1 and Level 2 of the building to apply the above standard. The below graphic diagram is a common jurisdiction transparency calculation method which we have applied to determine transparency calculations of our proposed project. The accompanying transparency exhibits detail where these zones are taken and how we have calculated the transparency standard. Applying a commercial use standard to a mixed-use project which includes residential uses does create some undesirable outcomes which we propose to modify. We have proposed at-grade residences to meet Grandview Framework plan requests however, typical occupants of these street level residences prefer not to be exposed in glass boxes to passersby. The team has strategically provided glass where it is most advantageous while still providing a marketable product for the end user. A typical market rate apartment project would have approximately 30% glass transparency. In this instance we are providing a minimum of 40.0% at the ground level units, which includes a view connectivity zone to our residential amenity deck. This is represented as a composite of the blue and green zones on our transparency diagrams. The design team has increased transparency to the greatest extent we believe will be successful for users of these street level residences. In addition to this standard, we are also designing our facades of at-grade residential units to best represent connectivity at all four facades in plan. This is to accommodate the future planned roads as part of the Grandview Framework plan. For all commercial spaces and activated public/semi-public residential amenity, we are providing a minimum of 75.0% at the ground level. This is represented as a composite of the orange zone on our transparency diagrams. We propose applying 75% transparency to Commercial and Residential Active Use spaces and 40% transparency to residential use spaces. B. All facades on the first vertical 60 feet of a building (above grade) shall use natural materials (Brick, stone) facing the public realm (streets, parks, sidewalks). Transparency Measurement Method *Building design is an illustrative diagram only, not the proposed project. Response: A contextual review of the approved and developing projects in the immediate vicinity shows each project is applying slightly different standards, but a common theme includes heavier use of masonry and premium materials at the base of the building where commercial and/or active use residential, commercial-like, spaces are planned and a lower percentage of masonry as the building moves away from the pedestrian environment and where housing is the primary use. An ability to move materials around the building and apply differing materials in multiple locations allow for greater design flexibility to break down the scale and massing of the building. This is being completed in response to City Sketch Plan comments from Planning Commission and City Council. The flexibility also provides a more responsive design to a mixed-use building where materials reinforce the use within the building, versus generic datum and height requirements. The proposed design applies premium materials (masonry, glass, metal) across the entire building fabric at all levels, with an emphasis on the pedestrian and user experience in commercial and residential active use spaces as well as along the base of the building regardless of use. We propose to provide 60% premium material (brick, glass, metal) on all facades, not solely public realm facing facades, to meet the intent of this standard. The current design meets this 60% premium material standard as shown in the submittal package. Additional take-off and calculation data can be provided if requested by staff to document the application of materials. C. No building facade shall be longer than 200 feet without changing direction by a minimum of 90 degrees. Response: This condition is currently met with the proposed design. D. Ground level first floors must have a minimum floor to ceiling height of 20 feet. Response: Similar to item A and B, the application of commercial standards to a mixed-use project which includes residential is not in alignment with the allowed proposed uses per the Grandview Framework plan. The project focuses increased ceiling heights for all uses at the ground level. Typical floors are 10’-8” floor to floor; and we are proposing 13’-6” or greater floor to floor at grade level floors. This design allows for flexibility in uses for the future while not creating excessively tall or un-activated facades due to the use beyond. Modern commercial spaces do not require 20’ ceilings and we are proposing market responsive clear floor heights to meet market for a multitude of users for the proposed commercial space. Additional architectural treatment has been provided at the commercial and lobby/amenity area of the building to increase the perceived height of interior spaces beyond with the application of premium materials and increased transparency. E. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of the same materials as the original building and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance. Response: Acknowledged and no exceptions to this standard. SITE HIGHWAY 100Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:23 PMCover Page 1/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review R - Residential P - Parking L - Lobby A - Amenity ** Apt RSF Based on Exterior Face of SheathingAverage Unit Size643760775950119614111448 * Total GSF Includes Additional 2% Applied for Depth of Exterior FinishProposed Mix4%4%40%10%20%18%4%100% Total267,22572,0273,364191,8336,710139,61012,21029,5426554132725613616896 Level P1P42,00036,4875,5125,4048965 Level 1L, A,P42,64735,5407,1078775,6933987931 Level 2A, L, P, R33,2283,36429,86478813,7595,4829,24921541215 Level 3A, R30,57230,5721,00926,0992,865111126526 Level 4R30,57230,5721,00926,0992,865111126526 Level 5R30,57230,5721,00926,0992,865111126526 Level 6R30,57230,5721,00926,0992,865111126526 Level 7A, R27,06127,0611,00921,4551,0353,0315123617 GSFLobbyAreaLevelsUseTotal GSFGarage GSF* RetailApt GSF*ShaftApt RSF** Amenity/CommonStudioAlcove1 BED1 BED +2 BED2 BED +PENTHSE 2 BED +UnitsStandard Parking Compact Parking Tandem Parking APPLICANT: OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RD WEST, MINNETONKA, MN 55343-0110 CONTACT: NICK MURNANE (952) 656-4444 Retail Bicycle Parking 0 0 spaces Residential Bicycle Parking 0 90 spaces Retail Loading 0 1 Small Berth, to be shared with Residential Residential Loading 0 1 Small Berth, to be shared with Retail Total Project Parking Spaces 183 Stalls Total Parking Spaces 35 Stalls Retail At least 1 space per 250 SF 13 stalls per 250 SF Alternative User for Restaurant Space Total Parking Spaces 35 stalls Accessible (Included in Total)3 stalls Compact (Included in Total)3 stalls Standard (Included in Total)29 stalls Restaurant At least 1 space for each 100 SF of indoor floor area, plus one space for each employee on the major shift and one space for each loading dock. 1 space for each 97 SF of indoor space. Total Residential WITH Reductions 170-17-17=136 stalls 148 stalls Total Residential WITHOUT Reductions 170 stalls 148 stalls One covered, long-term bicycle parking space per three dwelling units. (33% total) 90 covered, long-term bicycle parking stalls provided. (66% total) 10% (17 stalls) Transit Reductions Building located within one-quarter of a mile from a qualified transit stop. Building located within one-quarter mile of 10 qualifying transit stops. 10% (17 stalls) Reduction Qualification Proposed Qualifications Reduction Amount Total Parking Spaces WITHOUT Reductions 170 stalls Minimum; 238 Maximum 148 stalls EV Level 2 Charger Ready (Included in Total)10%5.5% (10 stalls) EV Level 2 Charger Installed (Included in Total) 5%10.9% (20 stalls) Accessible (Included in Total)3 stalls Tandem (Included in Total)6 stalls Compact (Included in Total)6 stalls Standard (Included in Total)103 stalls Dwelling, Multiple Unit At least 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit but no more than 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit 1.09 per dwelling unit Parking and Loading Required Provided Rear 20'. Above 35' in height, the setback will increase to match building height. 10' Street Side 35'. Above 35' in height, the setback will increase to match building height 10' Interior Side 20'. Above 35' in height, the setback will increase to match building height. 10' Front 35'. Above 35' in height, the setback will increase to match building height. 10' Building Setback Required Provided Building Height 4 stories / 48'7 stories / 76' Allowed Provided Max. F.A.R.0.5 of tract 4.5 Allowed Provided Max. Building Coverage 30% of tract 68% Allowed Provided Unit Breakdown Studio: 6, Alcove: 5, 1-BDRM: 54, 1-BDRM+:13, 2-BDRM: 27, 2-BDRM+: 25, Penthouse 2-BDRM+: 6 Number of Dwelling Units 136 Units Zone Lot Size 59,402 SF 1.36 Acres Proposed PUD: Planned Unit District Multiple-Unit Dwelling, Commercial Existing POD-1: Planned Office District-1 Office Zoning District Use SURVEYOR: SUNDE LAND SURVEYING ADDRESS: 9001 E BLOOMINGTON FWY #118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 CONTACT: ARLEE CARLSON (952) 881-2455 CIVIL ENGINEERING: SAMBATEK, INC. ADDRESS: 12800 WHITEWATER DR. #300, MINNETONKA, MN 55343 CONTACT: MARK ANDERSON (763) 476-6010 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DAMON FARBER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS ADDRESS: 310 S 4TH AVE SUITE 7050, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 CONTACT: JESSE SYMYNKYWICZ (612) 332-7522 ARCHITECT: OPUS AE GROUP, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RD WEST, MINNETONKA, MN 55343-0110 CONTACT: THEO GROTHE (952) 656-4444 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: OPUS DESIGN BUILD, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RD WEST, MINNETONKA, MN 55343-0110 CONTACT: GEORGE PARRINO (952) 656-4444 Eden 100 Multi-Family Site Plan Review Set 22 22 T PROPOSED BUILDING 32,564 S.F. FFE=935.00 LFE=921.50 T7.0'27.0'R10.0'R10.0 'R5.0'R5. 0 ' 23.0'10.0' 4.9'28.3'A A A A A A D D D E E E D D C C B B C G17.0'8.0'7.0'8.0' E 8. 0 '8.0 ' 6.5' 10.0' 6.0'23.1'A H I PROPOSED 10' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED 10' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED 10' BUILDING & PARKING SETBACK Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 / 51944 MCA TLL/JMW MCA 06/21/2023 ISSUE RECORD XX/XX/23 Submittal XX/XX/23 Submittal CONSULTANT REGISTRATION Registration No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. Date:23450 Mark C. Anderson 06/21/2023 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. A.BUILDING, STOOPS, STAIRS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) B.B-612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER C.B-618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER D.CONCRETE SIDEWALK E.RETAINING WALL F.ADA ACCESS LOCATION G.TRANSFORMER H.TURF REINFORCEMENT AREA I.MONUMENT SIGN KEY NOTES 1.NOTES PLACEHOLDER DEVELOPMENT NOTES PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY RETAINING WALL TREE LINE SAW CUT LINE BOLLARD PARKING STALL COUNT## 1 KEY NOTE HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVING CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVING LIGHT POLE (BY OTHERS) EASEMENT LINE CONCRETE CURB BUILDING LINE SIGN AREA GROSS SITE AREA SETBACKS FRONT YARD REAR YARD SIDE YARD ZONING EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED ZONING GREEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED PERVIOUS PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 59,401 SF 1.364 AC 10 FT 10 FT 10 FT POD-1 (PLANNED OFFICE) PUD 7,996 SF 51,405 FT SITE PLAN 4/22Monday, June 12, 2023 4:15:53 PM - User:JWeyenberg L:\PROJECTS\51944\CAD\Sheets\51944-C3.01-SITE.dwg T PROPOSED BUILDING 32,564 S.F. FFE=935.00 LFE=921.50 T 935.21 933.05 935.00 935.00 921.50 921.50 921.50 931.50 935.00 935.00 922.09 918.71 929.62 926.22 925.97 921.50 930.99 934.35 933.12 932.65 931.5 934.42 928.32 924.24 933.41 933.26 B/W: 931.63 T/W: 935.00 934.52 T/W: 935.00B/W: 929.52 931.00 T/W: 929.73 B/W: 922.09 T/W: 924.11 B/W: 924.11 931.10 934.00 935.00 934.96 935.00934.74935.72 B/W: 932.00 T/W: 935.00 935.00 T/W: 923.50 B/W: 921.50 921.50 932.00 934.93 921.25 921.25 921.70 921.82 918.99 921.50 9.60%2.93%7.34%10.10%3.22% 935.00 934.88 0.32%4.22% 921.93 921.81 919.40 919.28 919.63 928.17 927.98 934.75 934.94 934.81934.78 935.00 935.00 933.01932.88 934.48 933.67 921.50 921.20 6.83% 932.00 931.50931.13 AMENITY DECK: 935.00 B/W: 922.65 T/W: 934.76 B/W: 924.00 T/W: 935.00 AMENITY DECK: 935.00925922923924926 927 928 929 930 93193 2 933 934 921 922 923 924 920 919 92 5 930 923 924 92 6 92 7 928 929 931 932 933 934 928.47 928.88 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 / 51944 MCA TLL/JMW MCA 06/21/2023 ISSUE RECORD XX/XX/23 Submittal XX/XX/23 Submittal CONSULTANT REGISTRATION Registration No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. Date:23450 Mark C. Anderson 06/21/2023 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND GRADING NOTES 1.GRADING NOTES PLACE HOLDER THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. SOIL BORING999.9 ST # DRAINTILE 902.50 902.50 SPOT ELEVATIONS RIPRAP EOF 902.50 OVERFLOW ELEV. CONCRETE PAVING CONCRETE SIDEWALK PAVEMENT BY OTHERS (SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS) BOUNDARY LINE RETAINING WALL WETLAND TREE LINE 902 CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER BUILDING LINE GRADING PLAN 5/22Friday, June 9, 2023 9:34:17 AM - User:JWeyenberg L:\PROJECTS\51944\CAD\Sheets\51944-C4.01-GRAD.dwg IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 / 51944 MCA TLL/JMW MCA 06/21/2023 ISSUE RECORD XX/XX/23 Submittal XX/XX/23 Submittal CONSULTANT REGISTRATION Registration No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. Date:23450 Mark C. Anderson 06/21/2023 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION STORM FACILITIES NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 1017 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT 11 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP) TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF 902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER PHASE 1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6/22Friday, June 9, 2023 9:34:17 AM - User:JWeyenberg L:\PROJECTS\51944\CAD\Sheets\51944-C5.01-EROS.dwg T PROPOSED BUILDING 32,564 S.F. FFE=935.00 LFE=921.50 T 9.60%2.93%7.34%10.10%3.22%0.32%4.22% 6.83% 9 STEPS 925922923924926 927 928 929 930 93193 2 933 934 921 922 923 924 920 919 92 5 930 923 924 92 6 92 7 928 929 931 932 933 934 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2 IP2IP2IP2 IP2 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 / 51944 MCA TLL/JMW MCA 06/21/2023 ISSUE RECORD XX/XX/23 Submittal XX/XX/23 Submittal CONSULTANT REGISTRATION Registration No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. Date:23450 Mark C. Anderson 06/21/2023 SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP & STOCKPILE TOPSOIL ROUGH GRADE / SEDIMENT CONTROL TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS FOUNDATION / BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTRUCTION PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING / SEED / FINAL STABILIZATION STORM FACILITIES NOTE: CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED. AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION, THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS, AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER, TO BE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ITEM UNIT QUANTITY SILT FENCE LINEAR FEET 1017 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE UNIT 1 INLET PROTECTION DEVICE (IP-1)UNIT 14 THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. * REFER TO SHEET C5.03 & C5.04 FOR GENERAL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES, LOCATION MAPS, AND STANDARD DETAILS PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND NOTE TO CONTRACTOR SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS QUANTITIES BIO-ROLL SILT FENCE SILT DIKE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DIRECTION OF OVERLAND FLOW TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH CHECK DAM LIMITS OF DRAINAGE SUB-BASIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICEIP# TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINSB TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED, MULCH, MATS OR BLANKETS AS OUTLINED IN THE SWPP) TSM TEMPORARY STORAGE AND PARKING AREATS TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINTILE 902 CONTOUR OVERFLOW ELEV.EOF 902.5 SOIL BORING999.9 ST # RIPRAP CONCRETE CURB STORM SEWER PHASE 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 7/22Friday, June 9, 2023 9:34:17 AM - User:JWeyenberg L:\PROJECTS\51944\CAD\Sheets\51944-C5.01-EROS.dwg T PROPOSED BUILDING 32,564 S.F. FFE=935.00 LFE=921.50 T 23 LF - 6" HDPE @ 2.21% CBMH403 RE=934.57 IE=931.57 W CBMH401 RE=934.75 IE=930.63 E IE=930.63 W CBMH400 RE=934.75 IE=929.66 E IE=929.66 SW CONNECT TO SYSTEM RE=934.67 IE=929.00 NE OCS302 RE=925.94 IE=913.81 S CBMH301 RE=913.86 IE=911.67 N IE=911.67 S 71 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.32% 73 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.32% 47 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.41% 66 LF - 15" HDPE @ 3.27% 61 LF - 15" HDPE @ 3.27% 61 LF - 8" HDPE @ 2.99% 82 LF - 15" HDPE @ 3.27% 35 LF - 12" HDPE @ 1.69% 73 LF - 8" HDPE @ 2.92% UNDERGROUND STORAGE AND INFILTRATION SYSTEM HWL: 916.94 TOP STONE: 917.00 BOTTOM STONE: 910.0 37 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% STMH300 RE=911.88 IE=909.68 N IE=909.68 SE CBMH201 RE=934.53 IE=927.22 N IE=927.22 S YD202 RE=934.04 IE=929.04 S 11 LF - 12" HDPE @ 2.00% 6" BUILDING WATER SERVICE RELOCATE EXISTING HYDRANT CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN STUB EXISTING HYDRANT ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION RE:928.30 (EXS) RE:928.98 (PRD) PROPOSED HYDRANT (2) 72" CMP STORAGE PIPES 106'x17'x7'106.0'17.0'12.4' SCALE IN FEET 0 4020 NORTH THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS A UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF ASCE/CI 38-02, TITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA." THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WORK, BY CONTACTING THE NOTIFICATION CENTER (GOPHER STATE ONE FOR MINNESOTA). THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SUBCONTRACTOR AGREE TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES, WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY HIS OR HER FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UTILITIES (UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD). IF THE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERS ANY DRAIN TILE WITHIN THE SITE, HE OR SHE SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER WITH THE LOCATION, SIZE, INVERT AND IF THE TILE LINE IS ACTIVE. NO DRAIN TILE SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PROPOSED EXISTING LEGEND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1.UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES HOLDER UNDERGROUND GAS LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DRAINTILE SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER CONCRETE CURB WATERMAIN EASEMENT LINE Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 / 51944 MCA TLL/JMW MCA 06/21/2023 ISSUE RECORD XX/XX/23 Submittal XX/XX/23 Submittal CONSULTANT REGISTRATION Registration No. I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional ENGINEER under the laws of the state of Minnesota. If applicable, contact us for a wet signed copy of this plan which is available upon request at Sambatek's, Minnetonka, MN office. Date:23450 Mark C. Anderson 06/21/2023 UTILITY PLAN 8/22Monday, June 12, 2023 3:50:54 PM - User:JWeyenberg L:\PROJECTS\51944\CAD\Sheets\51944-C6.01-UTIL.dwg TREE PROTECTION FENCEEXISTING TREE TO REMAINREMOVE EXISTING TREELEGENDSYMBOLDESCRIPTIONCAL/SIZETYPESTATUSDEMO 9MAPLEDEMODEMO14MAPLEDEMODEMO14SPRUCEDEMODEMO12SPRUCEPRESERVEDEMO14SPRUCEPRESERVEDEMO14SPRUCEPRESERVET-01T-02T-03T-04T-05T-06T-01T-02TREE PROTECTIONFENCINGTREE PROTECTIONFENCINGT-03T-05T-06T-04T-03E D E N R O A D A R C A D I A A V E N U E NORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'Opus Design Build, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444Opus AE Group, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPLOT DATE:PROJECTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPROJECT MANAGERDATEPROJECT ADDRESS6/8/2023 5:57:37 PM Eden 100Multi-Family5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN32171000BMSJS06/21/2023ISSUE RECORDI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedLandscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.NameRegistration#SignatureDateNOT FORCONSTRUCTION9/22Tree PreservationPlan 1 - TB1 - AR1 - AR1 - TB1 - TB1 - TB4 - QE1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AR1 - AR1 - TB1 - AR1 - TB1 - TB1 - TB1 - AR1 - TB1 - TB1 - AR1 - TB1 - TB3 - QE1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG1 - AG2,777 sf - SOD374 sf - SOD1,752 sf - SOD3,258 sf - SOD28 sf - SOD280 sf - SOD1 - AG1 - AGE D E N R O A D A R C A D I A A V E N U E TREESCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZEREMARKSAR7ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE5.5" CAL.AG14AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' / AUTUMN BRILLIANCE APPLE SERVICEBERRY2.5" CAL.QE7QUERCUS X 'CRIMSCHMIDT' / CRIMSON SPIRE™ OAK3.5" CALTB12TILIA AMERICANA 'BOULEVARD' / BOULEVARD AMERICAN LINDEN4.5" CAL.SHRUBSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZESPACINGREMARKSCK98CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#536" o.c.CM104CAREX MUSKINGUMENSIS / PALM SEDGE#524" o.c.DL73DIERVILLA LONICERA / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE#548" o.c.EC151ECHINACEA PURPUREA / PURPLE CONEFLOWER#524" o.c.RG15RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW' / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC#560" o.c.RH39RUDBECKIA HIRTA / BLACK-EYED SUSAN#536" o.c.TT34TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' / TAUNTON'S ANGLO-JAPANESE YEW#554" o.c.GROUND COVERSCODEQTYBOTANICAL / COMMON NAMESIZESPACINGREMARKSSOD8,966 SFSODSODPLANT SCHEDULENORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'10/22Landscape PlanOpus Design Build, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444Opus AE Group, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPLOT DATE:PROJECTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPROJECT MANAGERDATEPROJECT ADDRESS6/8/2023 5:57:37 PM Eden 100Multi-Family5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN32171000BMSJS06/21/2023ISSUE RECORDI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedLandscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.NameRegistration#SignatureDateNOT FORCONSTRUCTION NORTH0SCALE:1"=20'20'40'60'Opus Design Build, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444Opus AE Group, L.L.C.10350 Bren Road WestMinnetonka, MN 55343-0110952-656-4444SHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERPLOT DATE:PROJECTPROJECT NUMBERDRAWN BYCHECKED BYPROJECT MANAGERDATEPROJECT ADDRESS6/8/2023 5:57:37 PM Eden 100Multi-Family5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN32171000BMSJS06/21/2023ISSUE RECORDI hereby certify that this document wasprepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly licensedLandscape Architect under the laws of theState of Minnesota.NameRegistration#SignatureDateNOT FORCONSTRUCTION11/22Landscape Details1136" RADIUSDIG PLANTING PIT 4" TO 6" DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADENOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITIONTHROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAPTREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BYLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATIONSECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOILPREPARATION.EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THEROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THEROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE,THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVELMANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THEFIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDERROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DONOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOILTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLYWITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALLDOES NOT SHIFT4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OFROOT BALLPLANTING PIT TO BE TWOTO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETEROF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPEDPREPARED PLANTING SOILPER SPEC6' DIAMETERMULCH RINGREMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROMTOP HALF OF ROOT BALLEDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLAN4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH INCONTACT WITH TREE TRUNKSCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PITWITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PREPARED PLANTING SOILDETAIL - TREE PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION.12"HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. ORGREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPECP-ED-011PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BEDAPPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENTHERBICIDE3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE INCONTACT WITH SHRUB STEMPREPARE BEDA MIN. 4" DEEPERTHAN ROOT BALL 12" MIN.SPACINGDETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING1" = 1'-0"EDGE CONDITION VARIES;REFER TO PLANPLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBSSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BINDWITH PLANTING SOILUNDISTURBED SUBGRADECONTAINER GROWN MATERIALSHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENEDP-ED-022PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FORTHE ENTIRE BED1'-6"6"MIN.SPACINGUNDISTURBED SUBGRADESCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIREBED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITHPLANTING SOILPLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALSCONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTSH AND LOOSENEDEDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACTWITH PLANT STEMDETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING1 1/2" = 1'-0"3P-ED-04HOLD FINISHED GRADE 1/2"BELOW EDGER- SEE PLAN FOREDGE CONDITION3/16" METAL EDGER W/ STAKEPLANTING AREA- SEE PLANTINGPLANTURF- SEE PLANTING PLANDETAIL - STEEL EDGER1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-ED-094 35772 SF GARAGE 140 SF COMMON 252 SF MECH. 375 SF COMMON 1103 SF TENANT STORAGE 646 SF WATER ENTRY 1680 SF TENANT STORAGE 468 SF MECH. +/- 911.5 PRIVATE ASSIGNED PARKING AREA - 100 STALLS TTTT+/- 911.5+/- 909.03% RAMP DN T10.0%5.0%(INCLU. 5 TANDEM + 6 COMPACT STALLS)RAMP DNEV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER READYSHEET PILE FOUNDATION ELEV. STAIR ELEV.STAIR Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:24 PMLevel P1 12/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"2LEVEL P1 0'40'10'20' 1938 SF LOBBY / LEASING 34843 SF GARAGE 146 SF COMMON 252 SF MECH. 2482 SF WORK FROM HOME 590 SF MAIL 683 SF PACKAGE SENIOR CO- OP PARKING GARAGE +/- 921.5 PRIVATE ASSIGNED PARKING AREA - 34 STALLS SHARED PARKING AREA - 49 STALLS GARAGE BELOW 24' - 0 " RESIDENT BY PERMIT PARKING ONLY APT. GUEST STALLS (14 APARTMENT STALLS + 35 RETAIL STALLS)+/- 921.5POOL ABOVE SECURE GATE+/- 921.5+/- 919.0OUTD O O R PATIO HUDDLES5.0%T (INCLUDES 1 TANDEM) TRANSFER BEAM ABOVE 24' - 0" RECESSED PC PLANK ABOVE 3% RAMP DN RAMP DN+/- 919.0 ELEV. STAIR ELEV.STAIR AWNING ABOVE CONF. CONF. OFFICEOFFICEWORK- ROOM RR OFFICE VEST. VEST.11' - 3 5 /8" 10' - 1 3/8" SHEET PILE FOUNDATION RESIDENT BY PERMIT PARKING ONLY EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED + RESIDENT BY PERMIT PARKING ONLY Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:25 PMLevel 1 13/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"2LEVEL 1 0'40'10'20' PARK BENCH PARK BENCH 855 SF 1 BR 3364 SF RETAIL 1439 SF 2 BR + 1201 SF 2 BR 545 SF STUDIO 7126 SF EXTERIOR DECK 770 SF ALCOVE 852 SF 1 BR 756 SF 1 BR 955 SF 1 BR + 1012 SF 1 BR + 967 SF 1 BR + 1387 SF 2 BR + 756 SF 1 BR 756 SF 1 BR 967 SF 1 BR + 541 SF STUDIO 5396 SF COMMON 1625 SF AMENITY 200 SF DOG WASH 777 SF BIKE VALET 1683 SF FITNESS 584 SF YOGA 598 SF MAIN ELEC. 403 SF GENERATOR 613 SF CABANAS 313 SF POOL EQUIP. 1134 SF TRASH 1405 SF LOADING SENIOR CO-OP GARAGE BELOWGARAGE BELOW PUBLIC POCKET ART PARK 8' WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALK AND BIKEWAY SERVICE DRIVE GARAGE ENTRY DRIVE RETAIL PATIO ARCADIA ART WALK+/- 935 +/- 935 10' PROPOSED SETBACK +/- 9353.5' STEP 23' - 0" RETAIL PATIO +/- 931.5 +/- 931.5JAN. RR RR ELEC.DATA DATA ELEC. ELEV. STAIR ELEV.STAIR 3.5' STEP SPA JAN. RR RR SHWR 8' - 7 1/2"10 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 "10' - 2 5/8"10' - 0 1/4" 20' - 0" 90 STALLS BIKE FIXIT STATION Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:27 PMLevel 2 14/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"2LEVEL 2 0'40'10'20' 855 SF 1 BR 1473 SF 2 BR + 721 SF 1 BR 1327 SF 2 BR + 855 SF 1 BR 1207 SF 2 BR 1440 SF 2 BR + 967 SF 1 BR + 1201 SF 2 BR 756 SF 1 BR 758 SF 1 BR 1230 SF 2 BR 756 SF 1 BR 1438 SF 2 BR + 1392 SF 2 BR + 915 SF 1 BR + 1213 SF 2 BR 754 SF 1 BR 756 SF 1 BR 683 SF 1 BR 693 SF STUDIO 1210 SF 2 BR 1128 SF 2 BR 763 SF 1 BR 758 SF ALCOVE 855 SF 1 BR 2864 SF COMMON SENIOR CO-OP ELEC.DATA DATA ELEC. TRASH ELEV. STAIR ELEV.STAIR RETAIL ROOF BELOW AMENITY DECK BELOW 45' - 1 1/8"49' - 6" Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:29 PMLevels 3-6 15/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"2LEVEL 3 0'40'10'20' 1903 SF PENTHOUSE 735 SF EXTERIOR DECK 1439 SF 2 BR + 1391 SF 2 BR + 1550 SF PENTHOUSE 1326 SF 2 BR + 756 SF 1 BR 683 SF 1 BR 683 SF 1 BR 855 SF 1 BR 855 SF 1 BR 915 SF 1 BR + 1210 SF 2 BR 1117 SF 2 BR 1728 SF PENTHOUSE 1828 SF PENTHOUSE 1811 SF PENTHOUSE 1406 SF PENTHOUSE 733 SF CLUB ROOM 3031 SF COMMON 302 SF DINING SENIOR CO-OP ELEC.DATA DATA ELEC. TRASH ELEV. STAIR ELEV.STAIR RETAIL ROOF BELOWRESI ROOF BELOW AMENITY DECK BELOW RR PAN- TRY 44' - 4"45' - 1 1/8"OVERHANG ABOVE OVERHANG ABOVE OVERHANG ABOVE Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:30 PMLevel 7 16/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"1LEVEL 7 0'40'10'20' RETAIL ROOF BELOW RESI ROOF BELOW RESI ROOF BELOW ELEV. OVERRUN ELEV. OVERRUN ROOF ACCESS ROOF ACCESS TRASH VENTS VENTING AS REQ. PER RETAIL TENANT SPACE RESERVED FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. FINAL FOOTPRINT AND LAYOUT MAY VARY. SCREENING TO BE COMPLIANT WITH APPLICABLE CITY REQUIREMENTS. AMENITY DECK BELOW Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:49:31 PMRoof Plan 17/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1" = 20'-0"1ROOF 0'40'10'20' LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" 1 12' - 0"11' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"10' - 8"13' - 6"13' - 6"10' - 0"ELEVATOR OVERRUNELEVATOR OVERRUN 11 2234 4556 6778 AMENITY DECK BEYOND 9 188' - 8" POTENTIAL RETAIL SIGNAGE LOCATION FROM AVERAGE GRADE PLANE77' - 11" BUILDING HT TO T.O. HIGHEST PARAPET921.50' (DATUM) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4"928.83 SEE NORTH COURTYARD AND SOUTHWEST ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDING FOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION 1234 6 78 1 64 5 7 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TO BE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALL MATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" MASONRY WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECTURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : WHITE OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #2 : DARK WHITE OR CREAM COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #2 : DARK BRONZE COLOR STORE FRONT WINDOW SYSTEM COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR METAL BALCONY AND RAILING COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 6 8 4 7 5 9 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:45:44 PMExterior Elevations 18/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1West Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"2North Courtyard Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGE PACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ONLY. ALL LOCATIONS, DESIGN, SIZING, AND SPACING TO BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT PROCESS AT A LATER DATE. LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" 1234 6 78 6461 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4" POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION SEE COURTYARD ELEVATIONS ANGLED IN VIEW LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" SEE WEST ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 1234 5 78 61444 178 2387 1 4 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TO BE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALL MATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4" POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION MASONRY WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECTURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : WHITE OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #2 : DARK WHITE OR CREAM COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #2 : DARK BRONZE COLOR STORE FRONT WINDOW SYSTEM COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR METAL BALCONY AND RAILING COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 6 8 4 7 5 9 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:45:47 PMExterior Elevations 19/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1Southwest Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"2South Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGE PACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ONLY. ALL LOCATIONS, DESIGN, SIZING, AND SPACING TO BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT PROCESS AT A LATER DATE. LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" SEE SOUTH ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 123478 14 4 1 14 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4" LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" 123478 614 417 5669 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TO BE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALL MATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4" ANGLED ELEVATIONS BEYOND POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATION POTENTIAL RETAIL SIGNAGE LOCATION MASONRY WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECTURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : WHITE OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #2 : DARK WHITE OR CREAM COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #2 : DARK BRONZE COLOR STORE FRONT WINDOW SYSTEM COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR METAL BALCONY AND RAILING COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 6 8 4 7 5 9 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:45:51 PMExterior Elevations 20/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1East Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0"2North Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGE PACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ONLY. ALL LOCATIONS, DESIGN, SIZING, AND SPACING TO BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT PROCESS AT A LATER DATE. LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDING FOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION 123478 145 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE107' - 4" MASONRY WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECTURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #1 : WHITE OR CREAM COLOR ARCHITECURAL FIBER CEMENT WALL CLADDING COLOR #2 : DARK WHITE OR CREAM COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #2 : DARK BRONZE COLOR STORE FRONT WINDOW SYSTEM COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR METAL BALCONY AND RAILING COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE COLOR SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1 : DARK BRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 2 3 6 8 4 7 5 9 Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 6:45:54 PMExterior Elevations 21/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1South Courtyard Elevation 1 SIGNAGE PACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ON THE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AS POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ONLY. ALL LOCATIONS, DESIGN, SIZING, AND SPACING TO BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT PROCESS AT A LATER DATE. Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 6/22/2023 5:50:29 PMPhotometric Plan 22/22 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 06/22/2023 ISSUE RECORD Eden 100 Multi-Family June 22nd 2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Site Plan / PUD Submittal Opus AE Group, L.L.C. | 10350 Bren Road West, Minnetonka, MN 55343 | 952.656.4444 | www.opus-group.com EDEN 100 – DEVELOPMENT DESIGN VISION 21 June 2023 GRANDVIEW VITALITY The primary goal of the proposed 1.36 acre P.U.D. development is to provide the level of vitality that this prominent site deserves. The site is currently an underutilized office building connecting Edina’s pedestrian friendly area of Grandview to the surrounding community. Enhancing the vibrancy of this site will contribute to the liveliness of Grandview as a whole. A mix of residential and commercial uses will attract more activity to the site while generating streets full of life to the greater Grandview area. MIX OF USES A mix of uses, both public and private will foster an active streetscape during the day and evening. A two-story parking garage has been buried into the hill creating building edges lined with active residential and commercial/retail uses to promote pedestrian activity at the street level. This is done thoughtfully in response to context of today and the future development of the greater Grandview Framework plan. The northwest corner of the project massing steps down to a single-story expression of commercial space opening up to the future Grandview Yards public space responding to future and existing context. 3,000 square feet of commercial/retail will cater to the visitors, residents and employees of local offices and institutions immediately adjacent to the site. On-site public garage parking will be provided for up to 10 stalls per 1,000 SF allowing for a mix of uses and flexibility of tenant profiles in this space. Retail and active amenity frontage is provided on the 3 street facing sides with the east side of the project providing walk-up townhome-style apartment homes in response to the Framework plans design for this type of streetscape experience. The project includes a total of 136 apartments, in a 7 story U-shaped building form which erodes and opens to views into Grandview. 10% of the units will be affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The lobby for residential use anchors the Eden & Arcadia corner. This prominent location takes advantage of the large Right-of-Way yard on the south along Eden, and steps down to the street level enhancing visibility and activity along the street. The current walls that have been installed by the city for the traffic circle can be dismantled and returned to the city for future use elsewhere in the area. The first story above the parking structure will deliver shared resident amenity spaces, including an attractively landscaped outdoor deck which will provide visible connection and openness to Arcadia and the park. Apartments will range in size from studios to two plus bedroom units, catering to young professionals, millennials, Edina residents and empty nesters in search of an active lifestyle residence in the Edina Grandview market. PUBLIC AMENITIES + RESPONSIVENESS TO GRANDVIEW PLAN Care has been taken in the development of this plan to respond to both the important Grandview Framework Plan as well as feedback provided by City stakeholders through the Sketch Plan process, immediate neighbors, neighborhood meetings and City Staff. The Framework plan conceived of a promenade running along the west side of Arcadia connecting 50th & Vernon to Eden Avenue. While this promenade has not materialized as expected with standard street sections and rowhomes, we are proposing to revitalize that vision to spark future extensions as the Framework plan is further realized to the north. A 10’ wide ‘Arcadia Art Walk’ featuring public community art is envisioned extending from our Northwest corner to the Southwest corner running along the east side of Arcadia. In addition to providing land for an expanded Arcadia section including street parking and landscaped boulevards; we are also proposing a grand 10-foot-wide walkway lined with active uses. Starting at the Northwest corner, a commercial/retail space including outdoor patio will engage the street. Terracing down the hill at midblock a public park is planned with an art installation opportunity to engage the street. Finally at the southwest corner the active frontage is a full story down at the Eden | Arcadia traffic circle level presenting the apartment lobby and work from home amenity to anchor and activate this gateway into Grandview. One could imagine as new developments are realized to the north the wide ‘Art Walk’ sidewalk could be extended including future art installation opportunities. In addition to the ‘Art Walk’ and public park, the project proposes a gracious 8-foot-wide publicly accessible loop sidewalk along the entire east and north edges of the parcel to provide a more comfortable and level pedestrian and bicycle connection from the west edge of Eden Ave. Bridge to local commercial establishments in central Grandview such as Hilltop and future Grandview Yards. This sidewalk will be activated with townhome-style walk-up units, walk-out resident amenities, public bike repair fixit station and commercial/retail space for a comfortable and inviting experience while eliminating the need to go down the Eden hill just to go up the Arcadia hill which wraps our site. Finally, the project proposes to improve the Eden sidewalk experience as well. The extra wide landscape zone for grade change and existing narrow walkway is difficult to navigate along the steep slope. The project proposes to ease this experience with a meandering and gracious 8-foot-wide walkway, expanded landscape boulevard separating pedestrian from vehicles, benches for resting along the path and lush flattened landscaping at street level along the slope. PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED ENVIRONMENT Contextual architecture and landscape design based on long-standing urban design principles will create a welcoming public environment that will attract pedestrian activity and encourage residents to go out and enjoy the city. In addition to increasing the energy on site, key design features will foster the goal of multi-modal transportation revitalizing an overwhelmingly auto-oriented environment: - The building massing responds to the context, with the tallest massing on the east and south similar to adjacent approved developments, and the scale of the building steps down towards the north and west opening up to and engaging Grandview. - The perimeter of the site is fully lined with attractive architecture and active uses, in ways that respond to the specific context of each particular street including existing conditions as well as responding to the future development of the Grandview framework plan street network. - Attractive outdoor spaces are provided adjacent to both the lobby and commercial/retail space. - The amount of curb cuts is minimized, and no curb cuts are located on Eden Avenue. - The vision of a pedestrian-oriented fabric along Arcadia and Eden is enhanced to facilitate connection to mass transit, City Hall and the greater Grandview mixed-use village. ADDITIONAL DETAILS On-Site Resident Parking 148 Stalls (1.09 / unit) On-Site Commercial Parking 35 Stalls (10 / 1,000 SF + staff) Building Height to Roof 76’ above AGP (Average Grade Plane 928.86’) Building Ht. compared to Jerry’s Office Approx. 7.5’ below Jerry’s Roof Deck Proposed Setbacks (all frontages) 10 Feet Affordable Housing 10% of units at 50% AMI On-Site Vehicle Charging Stations 10.9% EV Stalls Provided (20 total) 5.5% (10 stalls) capable EDEN 100 – PROJECT INFORMATION 21 June 2023 CIVIL ENGINEERING NARRATIVE The Eden 100 project grade design accommodates fifteen feet of fall across the site by providing two building floor elevations with ground access to the street elevation. The lowest floor level at the southwest side of the building is at 921.5 and includes the apartment lobby and amenity area. The higher floor elevation of 935 is located at the northwest side of the building where the retail and patio space is located. In between these two floor elevations is a loading zone, an art park and the entrance to the below grade parking level. The grading plan also accommodates a sidewalk route along the east and north sides of the building at a moderate slope in lieu of a path down Eden Avenue and rising back up again along Arcadia Avenue. The utility design for Eden 100 includes utilizing existing sewer and water access points on Eden and Arcadia Avenue to avoid disturbing the newly constructed pavements. The design also includes an underground stormwater system at the west side of the building to address rate, volume, and treatment requirements. The site will improve the stormwater discharged downstream, since the existing office building site does not have any stormwater treatment. The site access will be primarily at the west side below grade entrance, so vehicles will no longer access Eden Avenue and impact the vehicular movements to the Highway 100 on ramp. The below grade parking, accessed from Arcadia, will accommodate public, private, and accessible parking needs. SUSTAINABILITY APPROACH As part of our P.U.D. request the development will be required to participate in the newly instituted Sustainable Building Policy. At this time, we intend to pursue Fitwell and National Green Building Standard (NGBS) rating systems however we are continuing to measure this quickly changing certification environment. Should our certification path change between P.U.D. approval and Building Permit submittal we will work with the City to confirm we meet or exceed the Edina Sustainability Building Policy. In addition, we are proposing to install approximately 11% EV stalls upon initial occupancy of the project exceeding Edina Policy with stall capability for another 5-6%. We will meet bird safe glazing requirements as prescribed in the policy. NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH The development team has been actively reaching out for feedback from many local area stakeholders including City Sketch Plan process and feedback (April/May), Immediate Neighbors (Our Lady of Grace, Hilltop, Jester Concepts), and a neighborhood meeting of residents within 1,000 feet were invited to a June 7th presentation. All meetings were very positive and a few of our immediate neighbors have provided letters of support for our proposed development which accompany this submittal package. EDEN 100 – SKETCH PLAN COMMENT RESPONSES 21 June 2023 Below is a summary of the comment themes we heard through City Council, Planning Commission and City Staff during the Sketch Plan Process. DOES NOT SEEM LIKE THERE IS JUSTIFICATION FOR P.U.D. WHAT IS DEVELOPMENT GIVING TO CITY? Response: Please refer to the attached P.U.D. Guiding Principles document along with our commented alignment. PROJECT IS TOO CLOSE TO PROPERTY LINES. Response: Revisions to the design have been made to provide a minimum 10’ setback on all frontages aligning with recently approved P.U.D. projects near our site, notably Maison Green directly across Hwy 100. Note that efforts have been made to exceed these setbacks whenever possible with average setbacks in excess of the 10’ metric. Arcadia (West) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 36’-10” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 42’-10” Eden (South) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 13’-10” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 46’-1” Hwy 100 (East) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 21’-6” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: N/A MnDOT Ramp (North) Setback: Minimum: 10’ Average Building Setback: 11’ - 4” Average Distance - back of Curb to Building: 27’-8” NEED TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS DEVELOPMENT DENSITY IMPACTS TRAFFIC. Response: City Staff has engaged a traffic consultant to review traffic impacts. At the time of this submittal the report is outstanding. Initial expectations are the proposed development impact will be negligible from a performance standard. BUILDING TOO BIG ON SITE, PREFER TALLER MASSING ALONG SOUTH (EDEN) AND EAST (HWY 100) Response: The design team has reworked the plan extensively to reduce the scale and size of the building presence on the street. In addition to increased setbacks noted above, the design now includes a fully buried parking structure (previously mostly above), nearly 100% active frontages on all sides including walkouts units, amenity deck opening and engaging Arcadia (previously a story above street level), Massing includes large stepbacks (previously none) specifically stepbacks at NW corner for a single story retail expression and receding steps greater than 30 feet at levels 2 and 6 opening up to Grandview proper, eliminating one curb cut on Eden and including internal ramping for better pedestrian safety and walkability around site, lighter material colors to create an airy feel and focused tall density on south and east aligning with approved developments along Eden. REFER TO FRAMEWORK PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES Response: Please refer to the attached Framework Guiding Principles document with our commented alignments. VERY VISIBLE PROJECT, BE CREATIVE TO CREATE A UNIQUE SPACE, PAGE 18 OF FRAMEWORK PLAN Response: Please refer to Development Design Vision including added Public Park, ‘Arcadia Art Walk’, expansive sidewalks and plantings, nearly 100% active frontages, commercial space, amenity street engagement and planning with future in mind. EDEN 100 – Planned Unit Development District Guiding Principles 21 June 2023 Per Sec. 36-253 the purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following. Below we have responded to each standard to clarify how our proposed project aligns with these guiding principles. A. Provide for the establishment of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district in appropriate setting and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Response: The City’s Comprehensive Plan has designated this site in the Grandview District which is planned to be a Mixed-Use Center. The Mixed Use Center designation aligns with our proposed vertically mixed-use project. Comp. Plan primary uses are proposed as retail, office, service, multi-family residential and institutional uses which also aligns with our proposed multi-family residential and commercial uses. Comp. Plan Development character and guidelines include creating new pedestrian and streetscape amenities which are provided on all sides of our project including a park along Arcadia and art walk. Encourage structured parking which is provided in our subterranean garage. Buildings may step down in height at intersections. As suggested in Sketch Plan by Planning Committee and City Council the Density is preserved at the East and South facades. The building has substantial step backs allowing the building to “step down” at the Arcadia and Highway 100 off-ramp as we transition to the public park at Grandview Yards and Hilltop. Density Guidance 20-100 units per acre. The project proposes to meet and not exceed 100 units per acre based on this complying standard. B. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetic, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and views to the future fully built Grandview District. In addition, public amenities have been added including the re-envisioning of the Arcadia promenade, Page 18 of framework plan, into a public amenity including a park, outdoor seating patios and commercial lobby spaces which engage and re-engage the pedestrian as they come to live, work and play around our site. The north and east boundaries will provide a more convenient, and less physical way to move about the area without having to traverse a hill down to just go back up to enjoy the central Arcadia commercial area. Our bike valet is located in relation to the future pedestrian and bike bridge connecting regional trails and access to City Hall. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future. C. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City’s standards to offset the effects of any variations. Desired design elements may include sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses. Response: The proposed project is requesting relief from the strict application of land use regulations in certain areas including setbacks, Building Height, Building Coverage and F.A.R. The proposed benefits being provided back to the city in exchange for the above relief includes: a. Removal of podium design and provision to add active frontage on all frontages, including removal of street wall podium conditions as requested during sketch plan by burying and concealing the garage. b. Improvement of stormwater to modern Best Management Practices. Currently no treatment on site. c. Pedestrian oriented design on all facades including publicly accessible sidewalks on all frontages, a pedestrian loop walk along the north and east, wider than City standard walkways in all locations, including a 10-foot-wide art walk along Arcadia and a public park with potential art installation, improvement and site amenities such as benches on Eden and bike repair station for public use. d. Providing additional private land to accommodate the widening of Arcadia to update the street section as well as the Arcadia | Eden traffic Circle encroachment into the property. We also propose to dismantle and provide back to the city, if they desire, the new retaining wall and railing for use elsewhere in the city. D. Ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned. Response: The project has been meticulously sculpted to relate in density and scale with the surrounding context. Greater setbacks have been provided than originally proposed and aligning with projects such as Maison Green’s 10’ setback. This will provide a consistent theme in the area and in most cases, we exceed, sometimes substantially, this minimum setback. The Eden and Highway 100 frontages have higher density which match currently planned, existing and future buildings along the Eden corridor. The project then steps down and away opening up a courtyard to arcadia and views into the central Grandview area relating well to any future development to the North. The North and East facades have been planned with a loop walk to provide active frontage, distance to property lines and flexibility for the future Framework plan street grid as well. E. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. Response: A traffic memo is being prepared and at this time we do not plan to increase or worsen the efficiency of local public streets. Our usage patterns are more spread out throughout the day vs. rush hour times when traffic is heaviest. Site stormwater will be brought up to modern standards significantly improving the current conditions. F. Preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views and screening. Response: The proposed solution has been intentionally designed to open up to Grandview and provide scenic views over the district and into the planned amenity courtyard. The natural topography has been extensively included in the design solution with all street frontages maintaining active uses and terracing to interact with pedestrians as they traverse the steep slopes surrounding our site. We have also proposed to provide a loop walk and bikeway on the east and north to allow for more comfortable connections from the Eden Bridge and the Arcadia commercial district. G. Allow for mixing of land uses within a development. Response: The project is proposing a vertically integrated mixed-use solution of multi-family and commercial space both with structured and ordinance compliant parking. H. Encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing. Response: The project will provide 10% affordable housing at 50% AMI per City standards for a P.U.D. I. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Response: The project edges along Arcadia and Eden both have very wide yards allowing for comfortable transition of a denser project such as this. The pedestrian experience will be supremely enhanced and where future planned development may happen to the north, the project has established 10-foot setbacks to be flexible for future development and relief at the streetscape. and bikeway on the east and north to allow for more comfortable connections from the Eden Bridge and the Arcadia commercial district. G. Allow for mixing of land uses within a development. Response: The project is proposing a vertically integrated mixed-use solution of multi-family and commercial space both with structured and ordinance compliant parking. H. Encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing. Response: The project will provide 10% affordable housing at 50% AMI per City standards for a P.U.D. I. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Response: The project edges along Arcadia and Eden both have very wide yards allowing for comfortable transition of a denser project such as this. The pedestrian experience will be supremely enhanced and where future planned development may happen to the north, the project has established 10-foot setbacks to be flexible for future development and relief at the streetscape. EDEN 100 – GRANDVIEW FRAMEWORK PLAN GUIDING PRINCIPLES 21 June 2023 THE 7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 1 Leverage publicly - owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. Response: Our proposed development is a direct result of the City’s pursuit and execution of this guiding principle. The energy created by the development of the Public Works Site to Senior living and Restaurant with park amenities as well as the pedestrian link to the Jerry’s parking structure has spurred our interest and desire to pursue private development within Grandview area proper. Our development is meant to be integrated and a catalyst for additional development in the area. 2 Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and resident will make the District a good place to do business. Response: The proposed development and density is responding directly to this principle. Increased homes for a variety of income levels and family sizes, add vitality and energy to the district, including patronage to the immediate restaurants and offices in the central business district of Grandview. Adding commercial/retail space to the proposed project only increases and adds to the variety of options available to all creating a destination where people want to live, work and play. 3 Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. Response: The local infrastructure has been methodically improved by the city including the Eden | Arcadia traffic Circle, additional traffic circles being installed near City Hall, public parking with pedestrian bridge and below ground utilities. The proposed project takes advantage of the local infrastructure capacity and does not inundate it. In addition, the proposed project uniquely works with the natural topography stepping down and re-engaging pedestrians at all elevations and frontages. Stormwater quality will be captured, filtered and slowed upon release into the public system as required by modern practices which the site does not currently adhere to. 4 Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive and life-filled place. Response: Framework plans are exceptional tools to spark development and are created with the mindset that they are not fixed designs but founded in principles such as these to guide development which can respond to the market and future needs of cities. While our project may not look and feel exactly like the vision images in the Framework plan it aligns well with these principles and development patterns of today and in the immediate vicinity of our site. In addition, care has been taken to design for the present and future including the burying of the parking structure and nearly complete activation of all frontages of the building. These moves activate Eden and Arcadia today with public and private amenities in the present while offering walkout units and amenities for residents of the future along our future planned North and East Framework plan streets. The publicly accessible sidewalk loop on the East and North edge of parcel is the first installation of these future streets and we look forward to working with City to connect to the future street grid and pedestrian/bike bridge over 100. We articulate many of the advantages of the proposed design in our Development Design Vision narrative. We are excited to add to a vibrant and life-filled space with greater density of households and supporting the local economy. 5 Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. Response: The proposed project will be one of many beneficiaries of the Jerry’s garage pedestrian link for our mixed uses. In addition, the project is providing additional land along Arcadia for convenient on-street parking as well as enclosed, structured parking for our commercial use on site. The apartments will also be fully parked per ordinance on site in a garage that is hidden from view providing additional greens space, setbacks and a public park. 6 Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. Response: We fully support multi-modal forms of transportation. The project is close to the minimum ordinance parking requirement and aligned when taking guest and future resident parking into mind. This encourages our residents to use one of the 10 bus stops located within a ¼ mile of our front door. Ubers, secure bike parking, repair stations, dog and bike wash amenities with street access encourage our residents to use other forms of transportation beyond a car when enjoying the district. This approach allows the development the opportunity to house people, not cars and activate the street frontages to the greatest extent possible. It is worth noting, should our residents choose to have a car we plan to provide 20 Electric Vehicle stalls upon opening with the opportunity to add as future demand grows, reducing emissions in the increasingly pedestrian friendly District. 7 Create and identity of unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and provides views to the future fully built Grandview District. In addition, public amenities have been added including the re-envisioning of the Arcadia promenade, Page 18 of framework plan, into a public amenity including a park, outdoor seating patios and commercial lobby spaces which engage and re- engage pedestrians as they come to live, work and play around our site. The north and east boundaries will provide a more convenient, and less physical way to move about the area without having to traverse a hill down to just go back up to enjoy the central Arcadia commercial area. Our bike valet is located in relation to the future pedestrian and bike bridge connecting regional trails and access to City Hall. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future. EDEN 100 – SOUTHDALE DESIGN EXPEIRENCE GUIDELINES 21 June 2023 Mayor Hovland requested we review and respond to Southdale Design Experience Guidelines, see below for the guidelines and how our project could contribute to these guidelines in the Grandview area. 1 Imagine Greater Southdale District evolution organized around human activity, with vibrant pedestrian-focused streets, beautiful parks and public spaces, and endearing and enduring buildings. Response: As noted in the Development Design Vision and Grandview Framework Guiding Principles the pedestrian experience has been a primary focus to inform the design result. Expanded sidewalks beyond City minimums, private property dedicated to the public benefit of a public park and pedestrian pathway embellishment to help the site endure the test of time and plan for the future. 2 Make the Greater Southdale District the model of healthy urban living. Response: Refer specifically to Grandview Framework Guiding Principle #6 response provided. We have designed to encourage multi-modal transportation, mitigate emissions by exceeding EV charging positions, and taking local infrastructure and landscaping into account. In addition, we intend to pursue FitWel certification which is a leading certification system committed to building health for all. 3 Invent sustainable infrastructure matching the district’s sense of innovation. Response: The design has taken care to perpetuate an enlivened District including pedestrian comfort, safety and convenience. It offers a planned connection not only for the present but also for the future framework vision. The roadway infrastructure improvements have been well planned and recently installed by the City which has capacity for the increase in development density across Grandview. 4 Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district. Response: A true vertically mixed-use project will provide a smaller more flexible commercial use compared to the larger sit down restaurant concepts currently planned and built in the immediate vicinity. The proposed development will tie nicely into the village fabric providing additional patrons to the district while also bringing a unique and different market position for a commercial or retail use. 5 Offer a spectrum of living opportunities integrated through the district. Response: The proposed project also provides increased housing types west of highway 100 which currently is made of up senior apartments and planned senior co-op units. Our proposal will include market rate housing for a multitude of family types while also including a number of affordable housing units. 6 Expand significantly the number and extent of parks and public spaces. Response: As noted in other narrative sections the project works in concert with the Grandview Framework plan guiding principles. While it does not recreate the exact vision but one that is present and based on present conditions and changes from recent approvals in the area. Our proposed development includes additional sidewalk width to provide an Arcadia Art Walk which can be expanded in the future. This concept was planned for the west side of Arcadia but did not materialize. In addition, we have added public commercial patios and a public park to provide respite and additional softening of the surrounding built environment adding to the park and publics spaces inventory of the District. 7 Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience. Response: The project has evolved to fully met the intent of a guideline such as this. Burying the parking garage, activating all frontages, even where streets do not exist but are planned in the future and providing relief and access. The parcel sits on an island due to its location and size however it will easily blend into the future of the district as it evolves. 8 Build (or plan for) a street network encouraging pedestrian movement across and through the district. Response: The Grandview Framework plan has a great vision for the future street network surrounding this site. The elimination and simplification of the Highway 100 on and off ramps will improve the walkability and accessibility of the district. Safe and welcoming pedestrian conditions will be created and as noted in guideline 7 above our proposed solution will evolve well with the future. We have worked closely with staff to accommodate surrounding future improvements. 9 Imagine transportation in the district. Response: We fully support multi-modal forms of transportation. The project is close to the minimum ordinance parking requirement and aligned when taking guest and future resident parking into mind. This encourages our residents to use one of the 10 bus stops located within a ¼ mile of our front door. Ubers, secure bike parking, repair stations, dog and bike wash amenities with street access encourage our residents to use other forms of transportation beyond a car when enjoying the district. This approach allows the development the opportunity to house people, not cars and activate the street frontages to the greatest extent possible. It is worth noting should our residents chose to have a car we plan to provide 20 Electric Vehicle stalls installed upon opening with the opportunity to add as future demand grows reducing emissions in the increasingly pedestrian friendly District. 10 Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites. Response: This is one of the most difficult sites in the Grandview district when taking into account, project parcel size, adjacencies, topography and visibility. As noted in the Development Design Vision, and based on feedback from neighbors and City stakeholders, the project design has pivoted from building against the grain to designing with it all in mind. No frontage is void of life and activity, parking is concealed, massing erodes to respect adjacencies and views to the future fully built Grandview District. The site is very well positioned to accommodate not only the present but engage and invigorate the future along with all the adjacent developments present now and the future. 11 Frame development guidance for evolution. Response: The planning of this parcel as been carefully sculpted to accommodate the future village fabric of the District. Future street networks and expanded public walkways and infrastructure are all carefully considered and executed at a cost to our project but for the benefit of the current and future District. Jester Concepts, LLC P.O. Box 582757 Minneapolis, MN 55458 November 28, 2022 Mr. Jay Fourniea Director, Architecture O pus AE Group, LLC 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN. 55343 RE: Community of Support for the Opus Group / 5100 Eden Ave Development Dear Mr. Fourniea I wanted to say thank you for spending the time to sit down with me and discuss your project at 5100 Eden Ave in Edina, MN. As a potential neighbor across the street at the Grandview site, we welcome more density in the area and more residents. I believe your project will help bring energy to this area and provide a greater chance of success for the businesses there. I appreciate you listening to my feedback, my thoughts, and my concerns. I am in support of your project and wish you the best throughout your development process. I look forward to connecting as both of our projects continue to develop. Thank you, Brent Frederick Jester Concepts, LLC Chief Manager Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Illustrative Site Plan PROPOSED 7 STORY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FUTURE SENIOR CO-OP “APPLEWOOD POINTE” FUTURE PARK AND RESTAURANT PROPOSED PUBLIC PARK SINGLE STORY RETAIL PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN WALK AND BIKE LANE 10’ WIDE PROMENADEPROPOSED PEDESTRIAN WALK AND BIKE LANERETAIL PATIO SERVICE ENTRANCE PARKING ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE PARK BENCH PARK BENCH BIKE FIXIT STATION AMENITY DECK PATIO NTSHIGHWAY 100 EDEN A VE N UE ARCADIA AVENUE SIDEWALKSIDEWALKPUBLIC ART PARKPRIVATE AMENITY DECKRESIDENTIAL UNITSGREENSPACEARCADIA AVENUEGREEN BOULEVARDEden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 East / West Site Section Through Amenities Showing Public Spaces SIDEWALKSIDEWALKPUBLIC PLAZARETAIL PATIOACTIVATED AMENITYRETAILARCADIA AVENUEHWY 100 RAMPGREEN BOULEVARDGREEN BOULEVARDEden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Street Section Through Amenities Showing Pedestrian Experience SIDEWALKRETAIL PATIORETAILUPPER LEVEL RESIDENT AMENITYARCADIA AVENUEGREEN BOULEVARDEden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Street Section Through Amenities Showing Stepbacks and Retail GREEN BOULEVARDEDEN AVENUEOPEN GREEN SPACESIDEWALKEden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Street Section Through Eden Showing Green Space Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Material Board Conceptual Image NOT TO SCALE MASONRY WALL CLADDING COLOR: BUFF OR CREAM METAL PANEL COLOR: DARK BRONZE ARCH FC WALL CLADDING COLOR: DARK WHITE OR CREAM METAL PANEL COLOR: CHAMPAGNE WINDOW SYSTEMS COLOR: DARK BRONZE ARCH. FC WALL CLADDING COLOR: WHITE OR CREAM Pocket Park Landscaping not Shown for Clarity 01 01010101 01 02 03 04 05 06 02 02020503030306060404 0404 CLEAR GLASS SPANDREL GLASS FRAME Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Perspective Image Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Perspective Image Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 06-22-2023 Perspective Image Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 07-21-2023 Rendered View from Roundabout Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 07-21-2023 Rendered View from Southeast Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 07-21-2023 Rendered View from Northeast Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 07-21-2023 Rendered View from West Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 07-21-2023 Rendered View from Northwest LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" ANGLED IN VIEW NO WALL CLADDING WINDOWS, TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMING ELEMENTS BRICK = 911 SF WALL AREA = 943 SF BRICK - 96.6% LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDING FOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION BRICK = 1437 SF WALL AREA = 1670 SF BRICK - 86.0% WINDOW, TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMING ELEMENTS60' - 0"RESIDENT AMENITY DECK Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 7/19/2023 3:19:16 PMExterior Elevations Materials MT-01 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 07/19/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1West Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0"2North Courtyard Elevation Materials TOTAL WALL CLADDING AREA = 22,696 SF BRICK WALL CLADDING AREA = 11,811 SF BRICK PERCENTAGE = 52.0% MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: • • • • • THE ABOVE NUMBER IS A COMPOSITE OF ALL SIDES OF THE PROJECT AS SHOWN IN THE SUBSEQUENT DIAGRAMS. LIGHT BLUE REPRESENTS TOTAL WALL AREA, DARK BLUE REPRESENTS BRICK WALL AREA. ALL AREAS TAKEN FROM GRADE VERTICALLY TO 60'. ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATIONS: WINDOWS AND WINDOW TRIM CANOPIES METAL FRAMING ELEMENTS ELEVATIONS STEPPED BACK FROM THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE ELEVATIONS FACING TOWARD RESIDENT AMENITIES LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" SEE COURTYARD ELEVATIONS ANGLED IN VIEW BRICK = 845 SF WALL AREA = 1866 SF BRICK - 45.3% WINDOW, TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMING ELEMENTS60' - 0"LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" SEE WEST ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW60' - 0"60' - 0"BRICK = 3735 SF WALL AREA = 7617 SF WINDOW, TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMING ELEMENTS BRICK - 49.0% Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 7/19/2023 3:19:35 PMExterior Elevations Materials MT-02 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 07/19/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1Southwest Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0"2South Elevation Materials LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" SEE SOUTH ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 60' - 0"BRICK = 1290 SF WALL AREA = 4433 SF TRIM FRAMING ELEMENTS BRICK - 29.1% LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" BRICK = 3310 SF WALL AREA = 5884 SF WINDOW, TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMING ELEMENTS BRICK - 56.3% Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 7/19/2023 3:19:55 PMExterior Elevations Materials MT-03 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 07/19/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1East Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0"2North Elevation Materials LEVEL 2113' - 6" LEVEL 3127' - 0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 4137' - 8" LEVEL 5148' - 4" LEVEL 6159' - 0" LEVEL 7170' - 8" ROOF182' - 8" LEVEL P190' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDING FOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION TRIM FRAMING ELEMENTS BRICK - 100% AREA = 283 SF RESIDENT AMENITY DECKPARK Opus Design Build, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 7/19/2023 3:20:14 PMExterior Elevations Materials MT-04 Eden 100 Multi-Family 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN 32171000 JF TG SS 07/19/2023 ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 Site Plan Review 1/16" = 1'-0"1South Courtyard Elevation Materials MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Metropolitan District 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 July 18, 2023 Chad Millner Director of Engineering 7540 Metro Blvd, Edina, MN 55439 SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #S23-013B Eden 100 NW Quad MN 100 & Eden Avenue Edina, Hennepin County Dear Chad Millner, Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for Eden 100. MnDOT has reviewed the submitted documents and has the following comments: Multimodal: MnDOT agrees with the developer’s proposed plan for an 8-ft wide sidewalk around the property. Please contact Sara Dunlap, MnDOT Multimodal, at 651-234-7725 or sara.dunlap@state.mn.us with any questions. Noise: MnDOT’s policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land uses and highways. Residential uses adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. In the case of this development, traffic noise from the highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities with the authority to regulate land use shall take all reasonable measures to prevent the establishment of land use activities, which are listed in the MPCA’s Noise Area Classification (NAC), anywhere that the establishment of such land use(s) would result in immediate violations of established Minnesota noise standards. MnDOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such developed areas. The project proposer is required to assess existing noise conditions and take actions deemed necessary to minimize the impact to the proposed development from any highway noise. Please direct questions regarding MnDOT’s noise policy to Natalie Ries of the Metro District’s Noise and Air Quality Unit at 651-234-7681 or Natalie.Ries@state.mn.us. MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113 Metropolitan District 1500 County Road B2 West Roseville, MN 55113 Review Submittal Options MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as: 1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are necessary, number each message. 2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT’s external shared internet workspace site at: https://mft.dot.state.mn.usmetrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning development review staff at for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s) after the document(s) has/have been uploaded. If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at faith.xiong@state.mn.us or (651) 234-7723. Sincerely, Faith Xiong Principal Planner Copy sent via E-Mail: Buck Craig, Permits Jason Swenson, Water Resources Lance Schowalter, Design Eric Lauer-Hunt, Traffic Brandon JB Nelson, Survey Doug Nelson, Right-of-Way Mark Lindeberg, Area Manager Michael Kowski, Maintenance Sara Dunlap, Multimodal Planning Kimberly Zlimen, Transit Tod Sherman, Planning Jake Schutt, Planning David Kratz, Planning Joseph Widing, Metropolitan Council Site Site Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 27 4/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study August 31st, 2016 Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 19 Figure 2.6 Diagrams of proposed improvements for walking and biking access, auto circulation and parking, and transit access and enhancements. Diagrams were developed during the Imagine Week phase of the Transportation Study. EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 WALKING AND BIKING ACCESS 1 1 4 4 5 EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 5 6 7 AUTO CIRCULATION AND PARKING 6 6 6 7 8 9 10 EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map 11 TRANSIT ACCESS AND ENHANCEMENTS LEGEND CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION Mid Term Changes 1. Create separated bike lanes and pedestrian paths on Vernon Ave- nue and Eden Avenue 2. Improve pedestrian circulation by Jerry’s and general retail 3. Create activation zones along streetfront of Vernon Avenue 4. Add more pedestrian crossings on Vernon Avenue 5. Expand walk/bike connections within district interior and improve circulation 6. “Right-sizing” design for Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue 7. Integrate highway ramp circulation with district street network 8. Develop district parking strategy 9. Free-right turns replaced with controlled intersection onto Highway 100 northbound 10. Remove northbound looping ramp 11. Transit schedule and frequency improvements 2 20 Timeline for Change • Continue rationalizing motorist access points in order to better manage traffic flow, especially the intersection of Eden and Vernon which is described in more detail in Chap- ter 3, Section 7 “Grandview Neighborhood.” • Unlock new parcels for long-term development, open space, or public use • Set the stage for long-term transportation investments • Improve the character of Vernon by creating “activation zones” of increased, though possibly transient, use immedi- ately adjacent to the sidewalks. • Continue the process of improving transit facilities to en- courage use by working with Metro Transit to relocate the bus stop at Eden and Vernon when that intersection is re- constructed, by providing more accessible park-and-ride facilities as parking is constructed throughout the area, and by adjusting service schedules and types to meet increasing demand. • Support the goals of Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets by incorporating those critical design principles into every applicable project. • Continue to incorporate best management practices for sustainability and resiliency into every applicable project, including stormwater solutions, materials selection, incor- poration of greenspace, energy efficiency, reduction of heat island effects, and support for all modes and abilities. Note that each scenario is cumulative, so the Mid Term Changes scenario includes all early action items and Short Term improve- ments. This provides the greatest flexibility, and allows the City to advance any of these improvements as conditions change or as funding becomes available. Analysis of these improvements are further described in Chapter 4, Transportation Analysis. 2 22 Timeline for Change Figure 2.8 Proposed Long Term Changes to the Grandview District transportation network. City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100EDEN A V E 53RD ST 52ND ST Jerry’s Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50TH ST These improvements are intended to complete the vision of the Framework Plan, establishing the character and scale for devel- opment of the plan and the necessary transportation improve- ments that can support such development. Though the Long Term Changes scenario envisions a grand scale of development over several decades, it also describes the requisite transpor- tation investments that should be in place when that level of development is pursued (Figure 2.8). The Long Term improvements target the following changes: • Complete key pedestrian and bicycle connections • Complete simplification of highway access • Facilitate high-capacity transit connections • Support delivery of the Framework Plan • Outline character of ongoing development and transporta- tion improvements • Improve the character of Vernon by creating “activation zones” of increased, though possibly transient, use immedi- ately adjacent to the sidewalks. • Continue the process of improving transit facilities to en- Long Term Changes GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEGRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOODRDIN T E R LACH EN B L VD Average modeled development density 120 dwelling units per acre Timeline 15-30 years Timeline for Change2 City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 23 Figure 2.9 Diagrams of proposed improvements for walking and biking access, auto circulation and parking, and transit access and enhancements. Diagrams were developed during the Imagine Week phase of the Transportation Study. EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * 1 2 WALKING AND BIKING ACCESS EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 D R LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * 4 5 3 4 AUTO CIRCULATION AND PARKING EDENVERNON 50TH HIGHWAY 100WILSONARCADIA49TH NORMANDALESHERWOOD50TH ST W TO SB HWY100 52ND GRANGE53 DR LIN KHANKERSON DALEI N T E R L A C H E N GNUOY SUG BROOKSIDEEDEN AVE TO SB HWY100 G WEIVDNAR 50TH ST W TO NB HWY100NB HWY100 TO EDEN AVESUMMITPINEWOOD SB HWY100 TO 50TH ST WWESTBROOKSB HWY 1 0 0 T O V E R N O N A V E S GRANGE RD TO NB H W Y 1 0 0 GRANDVIEWHIGHWAY 100 BROOKSIDE VERNON50TH ST W TO NB HWY100 0040200Feet ¯Edina GrandView District Transportation Study Legend Street Centerline Railroad Building Footprints Parcels Study Area Base Map * * * * 6 7 8 TRANSIT ACCESS AND ENHANCEMENTS 6 LEGEND CROSSWALKS SEPARATED WALK AND BIKE PATHS VEHICULAR CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT REMOVAL OF REDUNDANT ROADWAYS EXISTING HIGHWAY RAMP ACCESS IMPROVED INTERSECTION IMPROVED BUS FACILITIES HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT LINE POSSIBLE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION Long Term Changes 1. Complete walk/bike connections within district interior 2. Pedestrian and bike bridge across Highway 100 3. Remove unsafe segment of road 4. New off-ramp frontage road system 5 . Complete street network within district interior 6. Proposed transit center locations to serve both rail and bus users 7. New bus stop and turn-around in conjunction with transit center 8. Potential for high capacity transit through the district 2 24 Timeline for Change courage use by working with Metro Transit to enhance and maintain bus stops, add a transit center, and adjust service schedules and types to meet increasing demand. • Support the goals of Safe Streets for Seniors, Safe Routes to Schools, and Living Streets by incorporat- ing those critical design principles into every applicable project. • Continue to incorporate best management practices for sustainability and resiliency into every applicable project, including stormwater solutions, materials se- lection, incorporation of greenspace, energy efficien- cy, reduction of heat island effects, and support for all modes and abilities. The Long Term Changes scenario (Figure 2.9) delivers on the vision for the Grandview District described in the Framework Plan. It envisions all major components of the Framework Plan in a way that respects its setting with- in Edina, and allows for safe multi-modal connections to, through, and within the District. The transportation im- provements envisioned and analyzed in this document are intended to support the level of development envisioned in each scenario. They are also intended to denote a level of trans- portation investment that will support and facilitate the scale of development considered in the Framework Plan. Analysis of the performance of these improvements are further described in Chapter 4. The Long Term Changes scenario is the culmination of that vi- sion in many ways, though it is not necessarily the end game. Each scenario takes a substantial step towards the Long Term goal for the Grandview District and sets up the ability grow beyond this scenario, within key parameters. The next section of this chapter describes additional infrastructure and land use improvements for the District. These are more substantial than what might be delivered in the readily foreseeable future. How- ever, the community acknowledges that such a future exists. The Far Term Changes scenario therefore describes the Dis- trict vision in the event that more substantial funding becomes available or more intense, more rapid development occurs, and sets the tone for improvements that may be beyond the scope of this analysis. Figure 3.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan showing Focus Areas throughout the Grandview District and beyond. CHAPTER Introduction 1 – Jerry’s Connection from Eden 2 – Arcadia + Public Works Site 3 – School Bus Site + New Ramp 4 – Vernon Avenue & W. 50th St. 5 – Interlachen Boulevard 6 – Eden Avenue Focus Areas 3 7 – Grandview Neighborhood 8 – Highway Access 9 – Highway 100 Ped/Bike Bridge 10 – Transit Center 11 – Our Lady of Grace 12 – Beyond Study Area City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST INTERLACHEN BLVD 50T H S T 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 11 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 (12) (12) 44 Focus Areas 3 H 6 – Eden Avenue As one of the primary corridors connecting Grandview to the surrounding neighborhoods, Eden Avenue plays a significant role in the overall transportation network in Edina. Currently, the design of Eden Avenue prioritizes motorized ve- hicle movement; there are no bicycle facilities and the corridor has limited sidewalk space (Figure 3.27 and Figure 3.28). In ad- dition, there are several intersections that are uncomfortable for people to cross by foot due to high speeds of turning ve- hicles and faded or unmarked crosswalks. The crossing shown in Figure 3.28 requires people walking or biking to navigate multiple lanes of high-speed traffic entering the Highway 100 southbound ramp. As shown in Figure 3.27, the existing condition under the rail- road bridge is not pedestrian-friendly. Figure 3.31 shows a proposed cross-section of Eden Avenue that includes space for people walking, bicycling, and driving. People on bikes riding Figure 3.28 Existing pedestrian crossing at Eden Avenue and the southbound Highway 100 entrance ramp. Figure 3.29 Proposed plan of Eden Avenue; 1” = 200’. EDEN A V E HWY 100ARCADIA AVEHWY 100SB ENTRY RAMPHWY 100 NB EXIT RAMP / NEW FRONTAGE RDWILSON RDGRANGE RDNEW FRONTAGE RDG Figure 3.27 There is a complete lack of pedestrian facilities on the north side of Eden Avenue, looking east toward railroad bridge. Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 48 Focus Areas 3 8 – Highway Access Highway 100 plays a significant role in the Grandview District providing access to and from regional routes by intersecting with 50th Street and Eden Avenue in a combined diamond/ cloverleaf intersection configuration. In order for the devel- opment of the District to be fully implemented, access to and from Highway 100 remains an important element of the trans- portation system, but it is also acknowledged that the existing interchange severely limits pedestrian and bicycle connections on either side of the Highway (Figure 3.38). The proposed reconfiguration of the Highway 100 interchange at both 50th Street and Eden Avenue would facilitate enhanced pedestrian and bicycle access while increasing safety as well as enabling developable parcels adjacent to the highway. Figure 3.39 shows the proposed west side configuration at both 50th Street and Eden Avenue. At 50th Street the signalized in- tersection with Highway 100 remains with the addition of a southbound right turn lane which replaces the free-right turn ramp that forces pedestrians and bicyclists to cross wide ramps with fast-moving vehicles. The eastbound free right turn lane to the southbound frontage is also removed to be replaced by a shared through/right-turn lane. The removal of these “free” right turn movements enables a continuous sidewalk with cross- walks to be implemented on both the north and south sides of 50th Street. A new intersection at Eden Avenue is created with the frontage road meeting Eden Avenue at grade at a signalized intersection. The existing southbound ramp from Eden Avenue which currently merges with the frontage road ramp is replaced by a single ramp to remove the merging area that is an exist- ing safety concern. The new west side frontage road provides opportunities for not only vehicular access to the Grandview District and Highway 100 but also for an enhanced multi-modal experience with sidewalks and bicycle facilities. On the east side of Highway 100 (Figure 3.39), the cloverleaf ramps are removed to enable development parcels to be creat- ed adjacent to the Highway with access provided by a frontage road mimicking the configuration on the west side. Access to northbound Highway 100 from 50th Street is provided from both eastbound and westbound 50th Street at a signalized in- tersection which enables the intersection footprint to be nar- rowed from the existing ramps with associated safety improve- ments for pedestrians and bicyclists. Access from northbound Highway 100 is enabled by a reconfigured ramp at Eden Ave- nue leading to the frontage road which also provides access to Grange Avenue and City Hall. These changes were analyzed for their traffic impacts on local streets, as described in Chapter 4. The changes on the east side of Highway 100 would require the relocation of the historic structures in Frank Tupa Park. Those structures are not at their historic location and a sep- arate process was already underway to determine if a more historically suitable and publicly accessible location is available. Reconstructing the ramps does not necessitate the elimination of the park itself, which could be reconfigured to complement the pedestrian bridge over Highway 100 and connectivity to the campus of City Hall. Figure 3.38 Existing redundant ramps and under-utilized space on east side of Highway 100. City of Edina Grandview District Transportation Study 49 Focus Areas3 Figure 3.39 Plan of the new ramp configuration on the west and east sides of Highway 100, showing the integration of the ramp system with the District road network, servicing new developable parcels; 1” = 200’.GRANGE AVENew Development VERNO N A V E / 5 0 T H S T R E E T HIGHWAY 100NEW FRONTAGE ROADNew Development New Development EDEN A V ENEW FRONTAGE ROADARCADIA AVENew Development New Development New DevelopmentNew Development New Development New Development Former Public Works Redevelopment Site 50 Focus Areas 3 9 – Highway 100 Ped/Bike Bridge Figure 3.40 Plan of a pedestrian/bike bridge over Highway 100, between Vernon and Eden Avenues; 1” = 200’. Pedestrian and Bike Bridge EDEN A V E VERNON AVE 50T H S T With the goal of celebrating more non-motorized transporta- tion users in the Grandview area, convenient connections for people walking and biking across Highway 100 are important for the District and the City of Edina as a whole. Currently, travel in the Grandview District by bike or foot re- quires the use of Vernon Avenue/50th Street or Eden Avenue. While there are plans to make walking and biking more com- fortable on these corridors, both would require substantial in- vestments to either retrofit or replace the current bridges over Highway 100. A bridge in the center of the study area for the exclusive use of non-motorized traffic would connect Edina City Hall with the central commercial area around Jerry’s Foods. As development continues on the land between Jerry’s and City Hall, this bicycle and pedestrian connection will further enhance the walking and biking network in the District. It is likely that this is in lieu of a complete “Grandview Green” as envisioned in the Far Term scenario in Chapter 2. Figure 3.40 shows the proposed location for the non-motorized bridge over Highway 100 connecting the east and west sides of the study area. The span would provide a direct connection for those traveling on foot or by bike within the District. Figure 3.41 Panoramic view of the proposed pedestrian and bike bridge area, looking east. Vernon Avenue is on the left, and Eden Avenue is on the right. GrandView District Development FrameworkEdina, MinnesotaDecember 7, 2011Revised January 17, 2012Revised January 25, 2012Revised January 31, 2012Revised March 27, 2012Revised April 5, 2012 24/05/12Ken Potts Kim Melin Randy Halvorson Chris Rofi dal Steve Buss Gene Persha Richard Borland Larry Chestler Laura Giertsen Ellen Jones Terry Ahlstrum Dick Ward Bill Neuendorf Tim McIlwain Bright Dornblaser Andy Brown Suzanne Davison Greg Domke Sandy Fox Dick Crockett Arne Cook Tom Bonneville Kim Montgomery Tim Murphy Th omas RaeuchleTom RuppertPeter Sussman Lisa Diehl Bob Kojetin David Davison Bernie Beaver Mike Platteter Peyton Robb Dan Gieseke Diane Reinhart James Justice Darcy Winter Paul Nelson David Novak Linda Urban Tom Mattison Ken and Adele Floren Michael Schroeder Jim SmithKevin Staunton, ChairMichael Fischer Brett Johnson Collin Bredeson Deron Lindquist Eric Bredesen Jim BaischSteering CommitteeConsultant TeamCuningham Group Architecture, PAClose Landscape ArchitectureHR GreenCommunity Design GroupSpringsted Inc.Table of ContentsExecutive Summary 31. Hope for Change 52. Thoughts and Interactions 63. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 94. Moving Forward with a Purpose 455. Appendix 57 34/05/122. Completely rethink and reorganize the District’s transportation infrastructure to:• Make the District accessible and inviting to pedestrians and cyclists;• Create connections between the diff erent parts of the District;• Maintain automobile-friendly access to convenience retail; • Create separate pathways for “pass-through” and “destination” automobile traffi c; and• Preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor in a way that ensures that the kinds of opportunities pursued in the future are consistent with the character we envision for the District and provide benefi t to the surrounding neighborhood.3. Leverage public resources to make incremental value-creating changes that enhance the public realm and encourage voluntary private redevelopment consistent with the vision that improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Th is Development Framework makes substantial progress in charting the path to be followed in redeveloping the GrandView District. By creating a vision that meets the seven Guiding Principles, it provides guidance to city offi cials, residents, business and property owners, and developers as opportunities for change emerge in the District. To ensure that the future redevelopment of the District is consistent with the vision articulated in this Framework, we recommend that it become part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.Executive SummaryTh e Development Framework presented here is part of a small area planning process required by Edina’s Comprehensive Plan for those parts of our community (like the GrandView District) designated as Potential Areas of Change. It follows the 2010 GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan process. Th at process – led by a group of community residents and business and property owners – resulted in adoption by the Edina City Council of seven Guiding Principles for the redevelopment of the GrandView District.Th e process of crafting this Development Framework has been led by a 52-member Steering Committee made up of residents of the community and owners of area businesses and properties. Th e 52 members of the Steering Committee have dedicated countless hours since April of 2011 listening to community members, considering options, and debating alternatives for the future of the District. Th anks to a grant from the Metropolitan Council, we have had the good fortune to be supported in our eff orts by a talented group of consulting experts. We have also been fortunate to have the patient support of City staff throughout the process.Our objective in creating this Development Framework is to build upon the seven Guiding Principles adopted by the City Council. In the pages that follow, we share a vision of how to bring those Guiding Principles to life. While there are many details essential to fulfi lling that vision, our goals can be summarized as eff orts to:1. Create a place with a unique identity announced by signature elements like:• A central commons on the Public Works site with indoor and outdoor public space that connects the civic cornerstones of the District and serves the neighborhood and community needs;• A “gateway” at Highway 100 that announces the District as a special place, using elements like an iconic pedestrian and bicycle bridge spanning Highway 100; and• An innovative, cutting-edge approach to 21st-century sustainability. 44/05/12We want to be clear, however, that we recognize that the Framework (like the Comprehensive Plan) provides broad direction rather than detailed requirements. Th is Framework is intended to be a vision of the future rather than a blueprint. Achieving the vision will require, among other things:• A feasibility study that examines the costs and resources available to bear those costs;• An examination of the height and density necessary to make the vision fi nancially feasible while ensuring that it results in the human scale and neighborhood character that is the essential to the Framework;• Developing a strategy to allow for a vibrant business and residential community by managing the mix of retail, offi ce, residential, and public uses of land while maintaining the currently successful neighborhood service and convenience character;• A determination of a range of possible housing choices that support the character and experience of the District.• A community building/public green programming group should work to determine appropriate program and uses.We discuss these and other “next steps” in the Implementation section. Consistent with the “community-led” spirit of the initial stages of this process, we recommend that these “next steps” include active participation by community members, support of staff , and leadership from the City Council. Study Area Location 4/05/121. Hope for Change 64/05/121. Hope for ChangeIntroductionHope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration, participation, and planning. Th ousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small) have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders, business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed offi cials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. Th e result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy, policy, and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable, memorable ways.Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 74/05/121. Hope for Change1. Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development.2. Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business.3. Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area.4. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-fi lled place.5. Organize parking as an eff ective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. 6. Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor.7. Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development refl ecting Edina’s innovative development heritage.The Seven Guiding PrinciplesGuiding PrinciplesPrinciples Related to the Concept Diagram1. Leverage publicly owned parcels2. Meet the needs of businesses and residents3. Turn barriers into opportunities4. Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive5. Organize parking; provide convenience6. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement7. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative161226374457 84/05/121. Hope for ChangeHistoryBefore Edina became a village almost 125 years ago, a country market road crossed Minnehaha Creek at Edina Mills. Headed westward to the high ground, it branched out as Eden Prairie Road and Hopkins Road. In 1869, the Yancey family moved from Ohio and purchased 127 acres of land including that high ground and most of the present GrandView District. Civil War veteran Beverly C., his wife Ellen and their seven children were to become the most prominent pioneer black family of Edina over several decades and left a legacy of civic involvement. An observer described early Edina as an agricultural village, “where there is a post offi ce, a mill, and a store, and proudly aspires to the dignity of a trading town. Th e numerous farms are well-cultivated, and are occupied by intelligent people who appreciate education, and surround themselves with the accessories of a refi ned society.”A center of the early community was Minnehaha Grange No. 398, organized in 1873. Th e Grange Hall originated in a meeting at the Yancey family home in 1879 with a “considerable number of persons desirous to form an association to build and own a hall building near Edina Mills.” In 1888, the name Edina was voted upon in that building, which also served as the village hall until 1942. When moved for construction of St. Stephen’s Church in 1935, a member of the Yancey family donated the new site. In 1970, the Grange Hall was moved to the present Frank Tupa Park in the GrandView District, later joined by the historic Cahill School.Changes in the district have been ongoing including transportation and services. Members of the Yancey family platted Grand View Heights in 1910 and Tingdale Brother’s Brookside in 1916. In 1913, the Dan Patch Line was cut through the high ground east of Brookside Avenue, providing passenger service to Minneapolis from 1915 to 1942. In 1927, new highway 169/212 (current Vernon Avenue) was cut through the District. Grading and paving businesses such as J. A. Danens and Son located to serve the growth, joined by motels and restaurants. Th e District expanded rapidly with western Edina following World War II. Th e Edina directory of 1953 listed six of ten businesses in the District as including “Grandview” in their names: a cafe, market, two service station, hardware, and seed Sources: 1. R. J. Baldwin, in Isaac Atwater, History of Minneapolis and Hennepin County (Munsell, 1895), p. 1263 as quoted in Paul D. Hesterman, From Settlement to Suburb: Th e History of Edina, Minnesota (Burgess Publishing,1998) Edina Historical Society, p. 29.2. Meeting minutes dated March 7, 1879. Copy in the Edina Historical Society fi les.Historic GrandView Heights Platand garden supply store. In 1947, Jerry Paulsen opened a meat counter in one of the local groceries, a modest beginning to Jerry’s Enterprises, a longtime prominent presence in the District.It is encouraged to look to the history of the District in naming the proposed public amenities and new streets. Th e Yancey family in particular, due to their early ownership of the District and legacy of civic engagement, merits that honor at a prominent location such as the commons. 4/05/122. Thoughts and Interactions 104/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsProject Schedule and ProcessSept Oct Nov DecPart IDiscussion and DiscoveryCommunity Workshop #1Part IIIdeas and OptionsCommunity Workshop #2Part IIIDecide and DeliverCommunity Workshop #3DeliverablesProject/Community Meetings Sept Oct Nov DecSteering CommitteeStaff CoordinationExecutive Team MeetingCommunity WorkshopWork Group MeetingsPlan Commission/CouncilProject Update#1 #2 #3Part I: Discussion and DiscoveryPart I is about learning from and listening to the Steering Committee, Work Groups, and other stakeholders; analyzing the study area and understanding the work done to-date; appreciating the larger dynamics of the area; and clearly defi ning the opportunities. An initial Community Workshop is held to conduct work group discussions/downloads, and a public meeting/presentation is hosted by the Steering Committee and the Consulting Team. Part II: Ideas and OptionsPart II focuses on developing ideas and options that address the specifi c issues raised by the Steering Committee, stakeholders, and the public process. The Consulting Team conducts a three-day Community Workshop (to be held in the study area) that will include Steering Committee meetings, focus group meetings, stakeholder interviews, team work sessions, and conclude with a public meeting/presentation.Part III: Decide and DeliverPart III consolidates all the comments, ideas, and options into a preferred direction. This part includes a third Community Workshop and public meeting. The Consulting Team prepares a summary document that may be widely distributed via a variety of sources (i.e., print, web, etc.) and a Sketch-up 3D model of the area with preferred options.Project Schedule: Th e project schedule was organized around three community workshops. 11Th e Steering Committee and Executive Committee have worked closely with the Consulting Team to facilitate a process that focused on key issues, opportunities, and recommendations. Th e process worked with the Steering Committee that met on a regular basis to guide the Consulting Team. A sub-committee of Work Groups addressed Land Use/Community Design, Community Needs/Public Realm, Transportation/Infrastructure and Real Estate/Finance. Th ese groups put an incredible amount of eff ort into initial background information and research, defi nition of issues, and discussion about ideas and options. A key component of the project was a series of Community Workshops held in September, October and November, 2011, that hosted a range of community stakeholders either in interviews, focus groups, program meetings and at public meetings.Th e community participation process included these primary groups of participants: Steering Committee, Executive Committee, work groups, City staff , focus groups (land owners, neighborhoods, public offi cials, schooldistrict, institutions, city departments, business operators, and others as identifi ed during the process), Plan Commission members, City Council members and the Mayor.4/05/122. Thoughts and InteractionsSummary of Participation ProcessThe Public Participation Process: Th e public participation process included Steering Committee meetings, work group meetings, public meetings, focus groups meetings, and program groups meetings throughout the fall of 2011. 4/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 134/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterConcept DiagramsIntroduction Create “go to” and “stay at” uses Connect throughoutEasy to get to; easy to get aroundPrinciple #2 in the GrandView District Small Area Guide Plan is about “enhanc(ing) the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections.”Th e Guide Plan also suggests that “Th e District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center.” Based on Steering Committee and Public input, this idea has broad appeal. But what do we mean by neighborhood center and how does that fi t with specifi c expectations and outcomes for the GrandView District?“Neighborhood feel,” “pedestrian friendly,” and “safe and connected” describe the desired character for the District. But the basis for these words lies in a clear vision for the key elements, or systems, that defi ne place...and further set the framework for future and ongoing development at GrandView. Th ese elements include Land Use, Transportation and Movement, the Public Realm and Sustainability, and will be described and illustrated in more detail in this chapter.Neighborhood Center 144/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 and the rail corridor. Arcadia is seen as a more residential street with a range of condo, apartments, and multi-level townhouse types. Mixed-use and offi ce buildings are anticipated and may be oriented to Vernon and/or south toward Eden and the Our Lady of Grace (OLG) fi elds, a signifi cant open space that is a visual amenity to the greater district.Vernon is assumed to remain more convenience-and service-oriented with improved pedestrian sidewalks/connections, safer street crossings (especially to the adjacent neighborhood), bike lanes, and better organized/managed traffi c fl ow and parking. Both Eden and Vernon are anticipated to employ Complete/Living Street principles that emphasize the place-qualities of streets.Across Highway 100 to the east, the Vernon/50th/Eden alignment culminates with City Hall; long term uses are assumed to accommodate a greater civic/community presence when/if the Highway 100 interchange is reconfi gured as a split-diamond facility.Goals• Develop and improve the district as three smaller “villages” that are connected physically and by a signature character and identity.• Recognize the need for a range of housing types and choices and address those markets that also reinforce the District vision.Land UseLand use in the District is currently focused on convenience retail and service uses that are visible from Vernon Avenue. Th e majority of these uses are auto-oriented and are accessible from Vernon and Gus Young Lane. Th e exception is the GrandView Square development that includes residential, offi ce, and civic uses organized around a central green space. Th e Comprehensive Plan identifi es the GrandView Heights District as a mixed-use center character area, a potential “area of change” and guides future land as a mixed-use center. Th e Comprehensive Plan also says that “the District is in the process of evolving from a somewhat scattered auto-oriented district to a more integrated mixed of uses.”Th e over-arching concept is to support the “go-to” uses (auto-oriented) while anticipating more “stay-at” uses (pedestrian-oriented), and to improve future use and built form around three key civic “centers”: • City Hall• Library• Community Commons (civic building and green space)Th e future land use plan proposes a broader mix of uses arranged around a new central green space (GrandView Green) located on the public works site and fronting Arcadia. Th e plan emphasizes a mixed-use sub-area between Vernon/Eden/• Emphasize the connection to Minnehaha Creek.• Create a recognized, visible arts identity and provide space/place for greater community arts users and producers.• Address needs of underserved populations (teens, singles, seniors, etc.).• Establish a community commons as a multi-purpose facility for a wide audience (e.g., whole body, whole life, health and wellness) and as a focal point and central gathering place that connects City Hall to the east with the Library to the southwest. • Celebrate the “Birthplace” of Edina, the Mill, and record the oral history of GrandView Heights; tell the stories.• Emphasize a pedestrian-oriented sense of place that produces an appropriate scale and function, and preserves surrounding views. • Support economic growth and community stability by providing accessible and effi cient connections between home, school, work, recreation, and business destinations through improved pedestrian and vehicular environments throughout the area. 154/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Land Use PlanVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use CenterOffi ceMedium/High Density Residential 164/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master PlanExisting BuildingsPotential DevelopmentProposed Civic Community Buildings 174/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Potential Build-OutVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveLibraryHwy 100City Hall 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking North 194/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic Works SiteLand UseDevelopment3.6 acres Site28,000 SF Public Green24 units Condominium42 units Apartments50,000 SF Community/Civic16 units TownhousesParking200 spaces Park and Ride200 spaces Community Use158 spaces Multi-familyTh e public works site is located in a central point of the District and is seen as the “commons” for how the District vision will be realized. Uses proposed include the community green space located on top of a parking garage that supports area businesses, civic uses, and serves as a Metro Transit park and ride structure; a community/civic building anchoring the green; and a variety of residential uses including condominiums, apartments, and townhouse building types. Townhouse units are envisioned to front Arcadia as a building type that can incrementally “step-up” the hill, providing a character unique to the District.Public GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesTownhousesArcadia AvePublic Works SitePublic GreenCommunity CenterCondominiumsApartmentsTownhousesEden AveArcadia AveEden AveA form-based code can guide desired building use and frontage. 203. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Land UsePublic Works Site Looking SoutheastGrandView CrossingArcadia AveEden AveHwy 100 214/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterProposed North-South SectionProposed East -West SectionLand UsePublic Works SiteGrandView Green Space on top of Parking StructureGrandView Green on top of Parking StructureNew frontage road on west side of Hwy 100ArcadiaOLGHwy 100Rail ROW Existing City RampJerry’sCommunity CenterCondominiumsTownhousesParkingEden AveGrandView Crossing 224/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBus Garage SiteLand UseEden Ave5,000 SF Retail42,000 SF Offi ce175 spaces ParkingDue to the elevation change, this site lends itself to supporting a number of commercial and retail uses by adding a small, one level parking structure contiguous to and south of Jerry’s. Th is structure would work with the existing topography to allow better access to the Jerry’s loading area and to provide additional parking to support the grocery and needed parking at grade. Th is site could also accommodate a drive-thru use such as a small community bank, cleaners, or coff ee shop.ParkingRetailOffi ce/RetailOffi ceParkingEden AveJerry’s 233. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center4/05/12Bus Garage Site Looking NortheastLand UseEden AveJerry’s 244/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1From a land use perspective, a number of immediate steps can be taken to set the stage for new investment in the District. Th ese include: • Policy changes to the Comprehensive Plan (the Small Area Plan is intended to update the Comprehensive Plan).• Potential zoning revisions that could include a form-based code to regulate desired public realm, building frontages, and building height.• Identifi cation of Eden and Vernon as early candidates for application of Living Streets principles.• Policy direction that guides overall sustainability of the District, including consolidated reuse/recycling, stormwater management, etc.• Policy direction that guides how new public and private investment may be supported with a variety of fi nancing tools.Th e public works site (public green space and a community/civic building) and the bus garage site are the two key parcels that can “jump-start” the redevelopment process. In particular, the ability of the public works site to provide a fee simple, unencumbered asset will allow civic/community and private and public realm uses to be realized early, and will demonstrate the leverage identifi ed in the Guiding Principles to support a variety of next steps. Th is could include a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide a parking structure that would also serve as the GrandView Commons (community/civic building/public green).In similar fashion, the bus garage can be a major pivot point for how a number of land use decisions may play out and will act as a land use “connector” along Eden. Th is site may need to be readied for development sooner than the public works site in order to accommodate a series of land use transitions that will help the larger District vision implementation. A third component of an early phase would be the development of the Wanner site currently owned by Our Lady of Grace as potential residential, offi ce, or retail uses.In support of these anticipated land use changes, new street confi gurations/alignments, circulation patterns, and streetscape/pedestrian improvements along Eden will complete a bike and pedestrian network and support the anticipated land use changes with improved automobile circulation and management.12637451. Public Works2. School Bus Garage3. New Bridge/Street4. Wanner Site5. Jerry’s Site6. Jerry’s Site7. City Ramp Access 254/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand UsePhase 1Hwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1 DiagramA. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic building• Arcadia steps• Community/Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail/service/offi ce useACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWanner/OLG PropertyTh e following chapter on Implementation is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or Phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site, and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time. See Appendix.C. Wanner Site• Townhouses fronting OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 264/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmPublic realm refers to all land and area under the ownership of the city. Th is includes city streets and rights-of-way (ROW), parks and open space, and parcels of land or other assets that are used to provide individual and collective benefi t and amenity to all residents and the general public. Th e greater value and power of the public realm is its ability to connect neighborhoods, businesses, schools, and parks and open space into a larger whole greater than the sum of the individual elements. Streets and ROW make up a major (and connected) portion of the public realm and represent a signifi cant opportunity to enhance and connect the community. It is critical to view streets, then, not as just conveyors for automobiles but also as multi-modal facilities that provide democratic accessibility for all and as form-givers and green space that increase the livability of the community. Th e result should be a greater sense of green throughout the District.Goals• Acknowledge “no net loss,” yet aggressively seek new public space.• Improve the bike and pedestrian environment: make it safe and friendly, and include adequate parking area for bikes.• Create a community/civic building connected to GrandView Green (an outdoor public green space) that connects east and west and serves as an indoor/outdoor gathering space.• Create a prominent public realm of connected parks, green space, paths, plazas, and private open space – a legible green framework as the primary form giver.• Provide views within the District and maintain important viewsheds (such as the “grand view”) for public use.• Plan for a safe, comfortable pedestrian environment that links public and private destinations north-south (neighborhoods, library, businesses) and east-west (neighborhoods, businesses, commons, City Hall).Images (top to bottom): Osaka, Japan; Montreal, Canada; and New York, New York. 274/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmA. GrandView CommonsB. GrandView StepsC. GrandView CrossingD. Arcadia StreetscapeE. Gus Young StreetscapeF. Arcade ConnectionG. Vernon StreetscapeH. Eden StreetscapeABCDFHHGEVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St51st StPublic Realm / Open Space Diagram 284/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons For GrandView, the public works site provides a unique and singular opportunity to create a major new public realm amenity that will add interest to the area for all stakeholders, value to real estate, and provide a signature gathering place in the heart of the District. Beyond that, an even greater opportunity exists then to continuously link the businesses and destinations within the District to the surrounding neighborhoods and the city in general. Th is can begin immediately by simply investing in a safe and connected public sidewalk network, increment by increment. Th e larger vision of the public realm includes a community/civic building and GrandView Green, a connected network of public parks, public and private plazas, a new street (GrandView Crossing), sidewalk and streetscape improvements, and bike and pedestrian facilities. Th is should include bridge enhancements on Eden over Highway 100, a pedestrian and bike bridge connecting the Commons with City Hall, and the potential to connect Eden and Brookside with local a bike path within the Canada Pacifi c Rail ROW.Montreal public green: Th is public green suggests the appropriate scale and character of GrandView Green. 294/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmGrandView Commons: GrandView Commons includes GrandView Crossing, GrandView Green, and a new community/civic building.Social InteractionExercise and FitnessClassroomTeen ActivityBanquet and ReceptionHistory / InterpretivePerforming and Visual ArtsMeetingsFood Prep / Community Oven Retail / IncubatorGrandView Crossing Pedestrian BridgeGrandView GreenCivic BuildingArcadia AveHwy 100GrandView Community Commons DiagramWhat / Who Populates the Commons? 304/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmVernon , Eden, Sherwood, LibraryEden AveEden AveLibraryTh e plan here is to focus on improving pedestrian connections between the Library/Senior Center and Jerry’s, via a more street-like character that extends north from GrandView Square Street, including a well-defi ned pedestrian crossing at Eden. Sherwood is shown as a conversion for additional parking and may still allow movement through the area, though at a very reduced rate of speed. Th is conversion allows a small green space to connect the Library to Vernon.1. Conversion of Eden Avenue would provide 50 additional parking spaces.2. A small green space connects the Library to Vernon giving the civic building an “address” on Vernon.3. Pedestrian crossings are created or enhanced to provide safe and visible locations (51st, 52nd, and 53rd Streets) on Vernon and to the west of the bus garage site on Link to cross the street.4. Th e GrandView Square area is connected to Jerry’s and beyond through the use of a streetscape that provides a well-defi ned pedestrian system as well as a more organized parking and circulation pattern.5. Any additional street and block improvements (including curb cuts and /or traffi c signals) should be considered after improvements have been made to Vernon and appropriate traffi c and parking studies have been completed (also refer to potential alternatives in the appendix)1123334Vernon AveGrandView SquareSherwoodBrookside52nd St53rd St5Link 314/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterPublic RealmEden AveLibraryGrandView SquareVernon AveLibrary Site Looking East 324/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterArcadia AveVernon AveGus Young LnJerry’sGrandView CrossingPublic RealmVernon, Gus Young, Interlachen Interl ac h e n Th e plan recommends a number of street and traffi c improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffi c, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians. Th is is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing) and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor) that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern. Anchoring the public realm is the GrandView Green, an approximately one-half + acre public space located on the north end of the public works site.1. New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing).2. GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area.3. Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair.4. Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed.5. Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon.6. Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements.7. Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100.8. Public steps of Arcadia.1233455678SummitCommunity / Civic BuildingCity Parking Ramp 334/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterCity HallPublic RealmVernon AveEden AveCity HallHwy 100Sunnyslope RdDale DrWith the future addition of the split-diamond interchange for Highway 100, the east side could see some signifi cant changes with the public realm, land use, and improved pedestrian/bike environments.1. Frontage road associated with the split-diamond interchange.2. Excess land from Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) could be used for underground parking (with a green roof deck) and future community/civic use.3. Strategy would provide an improved/expanded Frank Tupa Park and setting for the historic Cahill School and Grange Hall.4. Grange Road alignment is “rationalized” to provide a more effi cient parking layout and allow for a small civic green (5) in front of City Hall.5. Pedestrian/bike bridge connects to west side of Highway 100.6. Eden is shown as a “parking” street to provide additional supply for City Hall.2456314 344/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationTh e GrandView area street and movement network is primarily composed of Vernon/50th Street (reliever/augmenter arterial), Eden (local street, state-aid facility) and the multiple ingress/egress ramp system of Highway 100 (designated a principal arterial). Th ere are other local streets, but most provide limited service (such as Summit Avenue) or access that dead ends (such as Brookside off Eden). Th e highway interchange has several on and off ramps that, according to MnDOT, are redundant and/or unsafe. Vernon is a county facility that, south of Interlachen, has seen a reduction of average daily traffi c over the past 10 years. Eden provides a secondary connection within the District east and west over Highway 100. Eden is designated the primary bike route through the District; Vernon and Interlachen are designated as secondary routes.Th ere are two major recommendations that support the overall movement and transportation goals of the plan. First, the Framework proposes that the Highway 100 interchange be reconfi gured into a split-diamond interchange to better manage through-traffi c and to provide improved local access/circulation via frontage roads east and west of the highway. Over time, this would provide a more connected local system (i.e., more local streets) with direct access to Highway 100 via the frontage roads. Second, the Framework proposes a new east-west street along the north half of the public works site (spanning the CP Rail corridor) connecting to Arcadia from Vernon, that would be paired with Gus Young Lane to provide a one-way circulation pattern. It would operate as one-way in (eastbound) from Vernon on the new GrandView Crossing, and one-way out (westbound) to Vernon/Interlachen on Gus Young Lane. Th is pattern would eliminate the left hand turn from Vernon (southbound) to Gus Young Lane.Bike improvements would focus on more lane area and identifi cation along Vernon and Eden, consistent with Living and Complete Streets principles. Over the long term, east-west bike and pedestrian access would be improved by adding a new bridge over Highway 100 that would connect the GrandView Commons to Tupa Park, City Hall, and the Minnehaha Creek mill area. In addition to more bike parking facilities in the District, the plan recommends an off -road option within the District: an at-grade bike path alongside the CP Rail ROW from Eden connecting to Brookside.Functional Class • Highway 100: Principal Arterial.• 50th Street: A Minor Augmenter.• Vernon Avenue: B Minor Connector.• Interlachen Boulevard: Major Collector.• Eden Avenue: Local Street.Traffi c Volume• 13,000-23,000 AADT along West 50th Street/Vernon Avenue.• 4000-8000 AADT along Eden Avenue.Goals • Support a more effi cient, compact, and safe interchange access to Highway 100 from Vernon and Eden.• Create a more bike and pedestrian friendly environment by applying Complete Streets and Living Streets principles to Vernon, Eden, and the local street network.• Create an improved circulation and access network between public streets/parcels and private development/destinations.• Create an enhanced parking environment that, in part, depends on shared, centrally-located District parking supplies.• Partner with Metro Transit to implement a community-scale Park and Ride and bus turnaround loop in the area.• Complete the historical transition of Vernon from old Highway 169 to a local District street.• Identify and implement a demonstration project for “Complete/Living” streets principles.• Provide additional auto, bike, and pedestrian connections east and west in the District.• Maintain and improve parking, access, and circulation in the short term for convenience, retail, and service uses.• Complete the pedestrian and bike system. Make bikes and pedestrians a priority and allow for a safe crossing over Highway 100.• Take a leadership role related to the Highway 100 interchange. Build the “reason platform” for multi-modal access and gateways.• Preserve the CP Rail corridor for future, possible public transit, and non-motorized movement/connection in the District.• Reduce congestion by providing safe travel choices that encourage non-motorized transportation options, increasing the overall capacity of the transportation network. 354/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterComplete/Living Streets improvementsPrivate streetscapesSplit diamond interchangeNew / improved bridgesTransportationVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100District Street FrameworkTh e movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” confi guration. Th is approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. Th e existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffi c would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term, there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffi c access and circulation in the upper core of the District. 364/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationDistrict Street FrameworkExistingProposed 374/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking WestVernon AveEden AveHwy 100 384/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationParking• Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/practical.• Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district.• Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply.Parking beneath buildingsNew access to existingSurface lotsExisting rampDirection of traffi cVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100PP 394/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationPark and Ride OptionsABCLocation Spaces NotesA Use existing ramp 244 Access issuesC New ramp in “cloverleaf” n/a Long termB New ramp on public works site 200 Fee simple587 Express RouteExisting bus stopsVernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Metro Transit operates the #587 Express route through the GrandView District before turning north on Highway 100 to downtown. Th ey have a well documented market that they serve in southwest Edina, and board riders on a daily basis who are parking in front of the library, in the city ramp, and in front of a number of businesses. Th ey are highly motivated to locate a “community” scale park and ride facility that would accommodate no more than 200 cars. At least two sites have the potential to serve this need: the existing city ramp and a potential structure on the public works site. Th e existing city ramp is currently undergoing a construction project (new water treatment plant on the ground fl oor) and according to the city, this would make adding additional levels problematic. Access will also be an issue as well when the new GrandView Crossing is built. Th e city does think additional parking could be located over Brookside behind and east of Jerry’s.Under the right conditions and with some minor improvements, the public works site could be converted into a park and ride lot tomorrow. Th is would be an interim solution (a similar scenario involving the site as an interim use for the Edina bus garage could also be considered). Th e advantage of locating a park and ride on the public works site is that it is a fee simple site that could be used with little change to existing conditions. In general, a park and ride could provide a surplus of parking during nights and weekends, and serve overfl ow parking in the District as well. 404/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationVernon Avenue Right-SizingSouth of the Interlachen intersection, Vernon Avenue would be reconfi gured into a three lane, divided section that would better accommodate local traffi c movement, provide a dedicated bike lane, and capture some of the ROW for pedestrian improvements and street crossings.sidewalk8’sidewalk8’boulevard6’boulevard6’bike lane6’bike lane6’drive lane12’medianvariesdrive lane12’Proposed Section for Vernon AvenueExisting Section for Vernon Avenuedrive lane drive lane12’ 12’drive lane drive lane12’ 12’Vernon Avenue Looking South: A new three lane section would allow additional space for bikes and pedestrians, and provide controlled left turn lanes. 414/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterHighway 100 ImprovementsTransportationShort Term Improvements Long Term ImprovementsNew rampsEliminated rampsSignalA major proposal involves the short term and long term confi guration of the Highway 100 interchange. Th e plan proposes a “split-diamond” arrangement that would manage access on and off the highway at signalized intersections. Th ese intersections would be at Vernon and Eden, and would connect with parallel, one-way frontage roads. Th is confi guration would allow regional traffi c to clearly and safely access the highway and still move into the District with predictability and safety. Long term prospects might include the transfer of unused MnDOT ROW for local and community uses such as civic building sites, future bus rapid transit support, parking, and open space. 424/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterBicycle ImprovementsTransportationPrimary bike routesSecondary bike routesTrail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden AveArcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of-way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 434/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterTransportationBicycle ImprovementsEden AvenueVernon between Eden and Interlachen Vernon south of EdenExistingExisting ExistingProposedProposed ProposedPrecedentPrecedent 444/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityOne dictionary defi nes sustainability as:• Th e ability to be sustained, supported, upheld, or confi rmed. • Th e quality of not being harmful to the environment or depleting natural resources, and thereby supporting long term ecological balance.For GrandView, sustainability is about how the natural and manmade environments coexist in a way that limits and/or prohibits harmful impact on the environment now and for generations to come. But it also has meaning for how the community and businesses will be sustained, supported, and upheld. One is not isolated or independent from the other; a comprehensive, long term defi nition of sustainability should guide how the District and the community move forward with goals, recommendations, and actions.Recent Activities Sustainability is a broad and deep subject that is constantly being refi ned from principles and policies to products and practices to fi nancing and implementation—perhaps so much so that it may seem diffi cult to determine where to begin and what next steps should be taken. For GrandView, it seems practical to review some of the recent decisions and actions the city has taken that will provide a foundation for how the District will grow, change, and redevelop.• Edina Energy & Environment Commission: Solar/wind ordinance amendments task force. City staff is reviewing proposed ordinance. • PACE Financing: Th e Edina City Council unanimously adopted the Edina Emerald Energy Program November 15, 2011, making it the fi rst Minnesota city to take advantage of Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) legislation. PACE, which was approved by the state Legislature in 2010, allows property owners to have the cost of energy effi ciency and conservation improvements assessed to their property and paid alongside property taxes. GrandView Tire & Auto, 5415 70th Street West, used the tool for the necessary fi nancing to install a 27-kilowatt solar panel system on the already green auto shop’s roof.• New Public Works Facility: Th e public works building was built with sustainability in mind. It has geothermal heating and cooling and used recycled materials, and its landscape was designed to minimize the development’s impact on the environment. A rain garden at the corner of 74th and Metro Boulevard holds and infi ltrates water from sloping parking lots with curb cuts to direct the water to native grasses and plants.• City Hall: Installation of solar panel project in Fall of 2011.• City Council Living Streets policy: Recommendation of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) to establish a comprehensive Living Streets Policy that integrated all modes of transportation and addressed issues such as traffi c calming, stormwater management, promoting active living, community feel, improving walking and biking, and enhancing urban forests. If approved by the Council, the ETC would work in collaboration with staff to prepare the policy for the Council’s future consideration. Mr. Sullivan reported a $15,000 grant was available to initiate the creation of this policy, which may cost $60,000-$100,000 to complete. • Adoption of MinesotaGreenStep Cities program, 2011: On January 18, 2011, Edina passed a council resolution to become a member of the Minnesota GreenStep Cities program. Minnesota GreenStep Cities is a voluntary challenge, assistance, and recognition program to help cities achieve their sustainability goals through implementation of 28 best practices. Each best practice can be implemented by completing one or more specifi c actions from a list of four to eight actions. Th ese actions are tailored to all Minnesota cities, focus on cost savings and energy use reduction, and encourage innovation. 454/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainabilityGreenstep’s 28 Best PracticesBuildings and Lighting1. Effi cient Existing Public Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.2. Effi cient Existing Private Buildings: Work with utilities and others to assess and fi nance energy and sustainability improvements of existing structures.3. New Green Buildings: Construct new buildings to meet or qualify for a green building standard.4. Effi cient Building & Street Lighting and Signals: Improve the effi ciency of public and private lighting and signals.5. Building Reuse: Create economic and regulatory incentives for redeveloping and repurposing existing buildings before building new.Land Use6. Comprehensive Plan and Implementation: Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it.7. Effi cient City Growth: Promote fi nancial and environmental sustainability by enabling and encouraging higher density housing and commercial land use.8. Mixed Uses: Develop effi cient and healthy land patterns.9. Effi cient Highway-Oriented Development:Adopt commercial development and design standards for highway road corridors.10. Conservation Design: Adopt development ordinances or processes that protect natural systems.Transportation11. Complete Green Streets: Create a network of multi-modal green streets.12. Mobility Options: Promote active living and alternatives to single-occupancy car travel.13. Effi cient City Fleets: Implement a city fl eet investment, operations, and maintenance plan.14. Demand-Side Travel Planning: Implement Travel Demand Management and Transit-Oriented Design.Environmental Management15. Purchasing: Adopt environmentally preferable purchasing policies and practices.16. Urban Forests: Increase city tree and plant cover.17. Ecologic Stormwater Management: Minimize the volume of and pollutants in rainwater runoff .18. Parks and Trails: Enhance the city’s green infrastructure.19. Surface Water Quality: Improve local water bodies.20. Effi cient Water and Wastewater Facilities: Assess and improve drinking water and wastewater facilities.21. Septic Systems: Implement an eff ective management program for decentralized wastewater treatment systems.22. Solid Waste Reduction: Increase waste reduction, reuse and recycling.23. Local Air Quality: Prevent generation of local air contaminants.Economic and Community Development24. Benchmarks & Community Engagement: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability eff orts, and engage community members in ongoing education, dialogue, and campaigns.25. Green Business Development: Document the use of assistance programs for green business and job development.26. Renewable Energy: Remove barriers to and encourage installation of renewable energy generation capacity.27. Local Food: Strengthen local food and fi ber production and access.28. Business Synergies: Network/cluster businesses to achieve better energy, economic, and environmental outcomes. 464/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability Goals• Take a position on sustainability; be a model for city wide sustainability.• Defi ne incentives to attract “Best-in-Class” development that deliver highest levels of sustainable design.• Take advantage of “free” resources: wind, rain, and sun.• Reduce heat island eff ect and create a pedestrian environment that is pleasant, shaded, and visually interesting.• Address stormwater runoff in all phases and facets of the District.• Build on existing infrastructure.• Take advantage of available partnerships/funding.• Create District (not separate site) solutions.• Apply GreenStep Best Practices.RecommendationsA number of recommendations should be considered for the District and emerge from what is being done by the City Council, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission, Planning Commission, other boards/commissions, and various stakeholders. Th e GreenStep Cities best practices are an obvious start to how these apply to the District. Beyond that, it will be important to defi ne the District in an organizational manner so that roles and responsibilities can be defi ned and actions coordinated. A good example would be how a District committee on sustainability could begin to defi ne the “GrandView Works”—a sustainable practices approach for how water, waste, and energy are addressed from a District point of view.For GrandView, there are three levels of approach and opportunity that build from what is being done today in the District (in some cases by individual businesses or owners) and lay the groundwork for a sustainable strategy:1. Work from existing strengths and build the foundation• Respond to existing plans, policies, and best practices already in place (local, county, and regional policies).• Educate District stakeholders about best practices, case studies, etc.• Establish a general communications structure and forum for what is being done.• Consider new policy to focus on redevelopment areas like GrandView with sustainability guidelines.• Stormwater management policy at the District level (works with both watersheds).• Pilot project(s) for solar light installation (pedestrian and parking areas).2. District Systems• Stormwater strategy under parking collection/storage/treatment/reuse.• Recycle/reuse building materials (after demolition).• Grey water use.• Trash collection and recycling within the District beyond what is currently required by the city.• Consolidated organic recycling focused on restaurants in the area.• Generate alternative power for specifi c uses/needs.• Green and white roofs.3. Closed Loops• Recycled stormwater into drinking water supply.• Recycled grey water into drinking water supply.• Off -the-grid.• Green buildings—zero carbon. 474/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterSustainability 4/05/124. Moving Forward with a Purpose 494/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Strategy1. Adopt the framework as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.As a policy document, the Comprehensive Plan off ers the ability to guide future development in the GrandView District even in the absence of more defi nitive plans. Once adopted, the framework provides signifi cant context for determining further directions and actions in the GrandView District.2. Establish an Implementation Steering Committee using citizen volunteers to guide the eff ort, including providing direction for key remaining areas of the framework, with working groups as needed to support the work of the Implementation Steering Committee.An over-riding objective of the GrandView District planning process is to utilize local citizens as experts in defi ning directions for an area identifi ed in the Comprehensive Plan as a location where the potential for change exists. With signifi cant investment of time, talent, and energy, in addition to the local knowledge that has been developed through the Small Area Guide process and the Small Area Plan process, it is logical that the process of planning using local citizens to guide the process should continue. Th e process to be pursued should, as in past eff orts leading to the framework, be defi ned by the citizen volunteers.5. Set a plan for the evolution of the District.Th e planning process was established with the understanding that the GrandView District would redevelop incrementally in concert with a vision defi ned by the community. A key aspect of the plan, and one that can be best defi ned once several of the decision points in Step 4 (above) have been advanced, is to determine a logical, sustainable, and reasonably defi nitive plan for its evolution.6. Provide regular updates to the City Council.A Steering Committee charged with guiding the further development of a plan for the GrandView District cannot act independently of other actions of the city, just as the area itself cannot evolve independent of the rest of the Edina community. With regular updates, the evolving plan can be assured that it aligns with other policies of the city.3. Evaluate the GrandView District small area planning process as a means of engaging citizens in local planning.As indicated in the Comprehensive Plan, several areas of potential change remain in the community. An objective review of the GrandView process will allow the city to determine whether it should be replicated, modifi ed, or abandoned as a local planning tool. 4. Initiate a process led by the Implementation Steering Committee to provide direction for key remaining areas of the framework.Remaining key decision points, many of which are interrelated but all of which must be defi ned in terms of the approved framework, include:• Transportation elements• Density and height• Housing aff ordability• Financing• Design and development guidelines• Community Building 504/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1-5 years5-10 years10+ yearsVernon AveEden AveHwy 100Generalized Phasing PlanA generalized phasing plan is shown that organizes phasing into three simplifi ed increments with the understanding that a variety of conditions will infl uence actual investment and implementation.1. Policy and RegulationTh is Framework recommends (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) that the District evolve from a Community Commercial Node (pg. 4-31 Comprehensive Plan) into a mixed-use center. However, the Plan also suggests a vision that may not be completely consistent with current zoning including how use, built form, and parking may be regulated. Concurrent with other implementation activities, zoning revisions, including the potential use of a form-based code and design guidelines will be addressed by the Implementation Steering Committee after approval of the Framework by the City Council. 2. Phasing, Development & FinanceTh e following graphic begins the discussion about how to best arrange and prioritize the public land parcels (public works site and school bus garage site) so that new investment and redevelopment can occur in a timely manner and in response to market and community forces. Central in this discussion is the school bus garage site which, when a new garage site can be found, can include new commercial/offi ce uses, replacement of existing uses, expansion of businesses in the district currently in need of more space (such as the municipal liquor store), and parking. Th is could help set the stage for how next steps could be accomplished including initial investment on the public works site, parking and circulation enhancements/additions, and Eden Avenue improvements. In addition, a community building / public green programming group should work during this phase to determine appropriate program and uses. 514/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Immediate < 1 year1 Development Framework approval2 Policy for implementation/fi nance3 Create Implementation Committee4. Implementation Committee should address programming of community / civic building5 Create sustainability guide from GreenStep6 TIF District7A Design Guidelines7 Form-based code for mixed use center8 Green building standards required for district9 Prepare Phase 1 Master Plan10 Address Lifecycle and aff ordable housing1-5 YearsLand Use11 Bus Garage site redevelopment12 Townhouse units on public works site13 Residential on Warner site/OLG14 Community / Civic buildingPublic Realm15 GrandView Green over parking structure16 Arcadia Steps/and streetscape17 CP Rail bike path from Eden to Brookside18 Add tree lined streetscape and monument signs into Richmond Hills neighborhoodTransportation/Infrastructure19 Park n ride structure/green roof@public works site20 Additional parking south of Jerry’s21 GrandView Crossing bridge & street22 Eden Living Streets/streetscape /3 lane section23 Eden Living Streets/Arcadia/Normandale24 New access from Eden to city ramp parking25 Jerry’s parking Streetscape26 Implement one-way pairs/remove left to G. Young27 Reservation on public works site for rail transit use Sustainability28 GrandView Works/Organics recycling center 29 Stormwater reuse & management policy30 Solar pilot project for public lightingMajor Recommendations 524/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation5-10 YearsLand Use31 Arcadia site redevelopment/include pocket park32 Apt/condo units on public works site33 Residential on Warner site/OLG/Phase 2Public Realm34 Small civic green at City Hall35 Arcadia streetscape improvementsTransportation/Infrastructure36 Vernon Living Streets/streetscape/3 lane section37 Dedicate right turn from Vernon to Interlachen38 Reconfi gure Eden as parking street@City Hall39 Eden bridge pedestrian/bike enhancements40 Vernon as primary bike route to GrandView Crossing41 Consider ‘turn-back’ of Vernon from County42 Complete Streets: Library green space fronting Vernon 43 Reconfi gure Eden as parking streetSustainability44 Stormwater collection/treatment system45 Grey water reuse/irrigation, etc.46 GrandView Works/geothermal at OLG fi elds10+ YearsLand Use47 East frontage road site redevelopment48 Civic development on excess MNDOT landPublic Realm49 Hwy 100 pedestrian/bike bridge50 Green roof/space over underground parking51 Add green space to Tupa Park52 Include gateway walls/landscape w/interchangeTransportation/Infrastructure53 Hwy 110 split diamond interchange54 Realignment of Grange Rd/Eden55 Add Gus Young extension to frontage roadSustainability56 Closed loop water supply system57 GrandView Works/Alternative energy sourcesMajor Recommendations 534/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation1DC - Downtown Core StandardsSide(2) Siting(3) Heightat the front of the lot: a minimum of 75% of build-ing facade shall be placed within 5 feet of the front lot line. This requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street or sidewalk 5’see Height Overlay District for minimum and maximum heights and upper storey stepbacksat the rear of the lot: 10’ setback required for load-ing areas, none if adjacent to street or alley.parking setback line30’at the side of the lot: none required. One side of build-inmg must be placed at the side lot line. Also refer to Neighborhood Compatibility requirements 10’commerceresidentialfi nished fl oor height: avg 3 feet above sidewalkfi nished fl oor height: maximum 18 inches above sidewalkA. Building Height i. Th e buildings shall be at least 2 storeys in height but no greater than the heights as designated on map____. Upper storey step backs are also designated on map____.B. Ground Storey Height: Commerce Uses i. Th e average ground storey fl oor elevation within 30 feet of the front property line shall be 1.Not lower than the front sidewalk elevation. 2.Not higher than 18 inches above the sidewalk. ii. Th e ground storey shall have at least 15 feet of clear interior height contiguous to the front property line for a minimum depth of 25 feet. iii. Th e maximum ground storey height is 22 feet, measured from the sidewalk to the second storey fl oor. C. Ground Storey Height (residential uses) i. Th e average fi nished fl oor elevation shall be no less than 3 feet above the sidewalk at the front property line ii. Th e ground storey shall have an interior clear height of at least 9 feet and a maximum sidewalk to second storey fl oor height of 22 feet. d. Upper storey height i. Th e maximum clear height (fl oor to ceiling) for upper storeys is 12 feet. ii. At least 80% of each upper storey shall have an interior clear height (fl oor to ceiling) of at least 9 feet. A. Façadei. On each lot the building façade shall be built to within 5 feet of the front property line for at least 75% of it’s length. Th is requirement applies to the building’s fi rst two storeys and to all parts of the lot that abut a street and public sidewalk. ii. Within 10 feet of a block corner, the ground storey façade may be pulled away to form a corner entry. B. Usable Open Spacei. A minimum of 40 square feet per residential unit shall be pro-vided. Th is space may be shared among units, or may take the form of balconies, roof decks, usable portions of green roofs or other above ground amenities. ii. Open space created infront of the building shall be designed as semi-public space, used as a forecourt, outdoor seating or other semi-public uses. C. Garage and Parkingi. Parking garage openings visible from the sidewalk shall have a clear maximum height of 16 feet and a maximum width of 22 feet. ii. Parking shall be located behind the parking setback lineMin 9ftMax 12ft clear (typ) max 22 ft (typ) (typ) (typ) PropertiesMinimum HeightMaximum HeightPublic realm / Private realmResultA form based approach is organized to code development that defi nes the public realm.Example of form-based code standards for a downtown setting. 544/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementation Financial FeasibilityFeasibility of fi nancing would include: (1) projections of anticipated costs associated with an initial Phase 1 plan and (2) options for revenues to pay those costs. Th is includes items such as street improvements, streetscape improvements, parking infrastructure, property acquisition (i.e., the bus garage), and community space (both potential “commons” or “public realm” space and “programming” or “community/civic center” space). At this point six potential pools or “buckets” of revenue have been identifi ed:1. TIF, Abatement, and other statutory economic development tools;2. Special Assessments;3. Enhanced Property Tax revenues generated by private property development;4. Other Public Sources of funds;5. Non-Profi t or Philanthropic Fundraising; and6. City Tax Revenues.1. TIF, Abatement, and Other Statutory Economic Development Tools.Access some portion of existing TIF Funds; there may be an opportunity to use existing TIF funds. Determine the circumstances under which that is possible and the consequences of doing so.Create a new TIF district. TIF and Abatement tools provide opportunities to “capture” increased value and use it to fi nance some parts of redevelopment. Determine a sense of the potential numbers associated with these options and any limits on how the funds generated by these mechanisms can be spent.2. Special Assessments and Related Tools. Th e City may assess properties that “benefi t” from public improvements for the costs of these improvements up to the value of the benefi t conferred by the improvements. Determine what types of costs are eligible to be recovered using this tool and on related tools that permit the creation of special districts to spread the ongoing costs of maintenance or other improvements. Th e 50th and France area may provide a model for this. 3. Enhanced Property Tax Revenues Generated by Private Development. Th is idea overlaps to a certain extent with #1 above (to the extent the enhanced value will be “captured” via TIF or Abatement). Obviously, the greatest increase of this type would be new development on parcels (like the Public Works and School Bus Garage sites). And consider the prospect of enhanced value emanating from redevelopment of sites (e.g., CSM, Eden 100, etc.) that are already on the tax rolls; having some models of what is reasonable to expect in this category is important.4. Other Public Sources of Funds. Consider the potential partnerships with other public entities that might be able to help with funding. Th e planning activities in this phase of the process have been funded by the Met Council; there might be a prospect of additional funds as planning and implementation move forward. Met Council representatives have also been clear in expressing interest in park and ride facilities. In addition to the Met Council, there are prospects for partnership with MnDOT (related to Highway 100) and Hennepin County (related to Vernon Avenue). To the extent that housing is a part of future redevelopment, there may be Regional, State, and/or Federal funds available to support those eff orts. Th ese any other prospective sources of “Other Public Funds” should be summarized and estimated. 5. Non-Profi t and Philanthropic Fundraising.Consider that private contributions could help with funding. Th ese potential sources of revenue fall into two categories: (1) funds from existing non-profi t organizations interested in supporting particular development initiatives (e.g., housing, arts, etc.) and (2) fundraising campaigns created specifi cally for this eff ort. Determine what is reasonable to expect from each “bucket” and be able to determine whether the “gap” remaining after all other “buckets” are utilized can be fi lled by some kind of capital campaign.6. City Tax Revenues. Th e other way to fi ll any remaining gap is with City tax revenues. Obviously, this is a decision for the City Council to make. It will be important to identify the size of the gap (if any) that will likely need to be fi lled by such funding. 554/05/124. Moving Forward with a PurposeImplementationPossible Staging Questions1. Interim use. Designation of City parking ramp for park and ride?2. Disposition of School Bus Garage Site. Can City negotiate control? If so, when and what are the next steps? RFI? RFP? Negotiate existing user in the District to acquire and invest. 3. How can public works site be best utilized in the interim? As temporary (2-3 year) school bus garage operations? As surface park and ride until structure is built? RFI? RFP? Interim use could allow time for community building use/need to be determined. 4. How to leverage adjacent parcels with timing of bus garage site redevelopment?5. What is timing/feasibility of west side frontage road/southbound ramp confi guration? How to advance that agenda in the short term (1-5 years).6. Eden could / should be programmed for Living Streets improvements consistent with initial phases of development. 7. Feasibility of timing of street, bridge, and deck improvements. 24617365Vernon AveEden AveHwy 100 4/05/125. Appendix 574/05/125. AppendixImplementationHwy 100Eden AveArcadia AvePhase 1ACBEDVernon AveCommunity Green Space on top of Parking StructureHousingWagner / OLG PropertyTh e following Implementation section is included as one example of anticipating an initial, or phase 1, increment and associated preliminary range of costs. Th ese numbers are not detailed costs but represent one possible range of expenditures that are included here to illustrate levels of funding (and investment) of various components. Th e Phase 1 diagram and following spreadsheets for the public works site, the bus garage site and local street improvements will vary depending on actual funding sources, timing, program, and other factors (e.g., cost of materials and labor) that cannot be determined at this time.Phase 1A. Public Works Site• Community Commons: GrandView Crossing (street) GrandView Green Community/Civic Building• Arcadia Steps• Community Civic building• Variety of residential building types• Structured parking• Park and ride structureB. Bus Garage Site• Multi-level parking• Retail / service offi ce use• Possible drive - thru useC. Warner Site• Townhouses fronting the OLG open spaceD. Eden Avenue Streetscape• Bus stop integrated• Boulevard organizes intersection alignmentsE. Jerry’s Streetscape• Pedestrian enhancements• Streetscape• Stormwater treatment 584/05/125. AppendixImplementation GrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲBusGarageSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sfNonͲresidentialcommercial 5,000 950,000.00$190.00$office 42,000 7,980,000.00$190.00$rampparking 75 937,500.00$12,500.00$surfaceparking 75 112,500.00$1,500.00$47,000 150 9,980,000.00$ 594/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲPublicWorksSiteSF Ac LF Units PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostResidentialtownhouse 16 46 8,832,000.00$160 1200 192000smallhouse 0 150 1200 180000apartment 42 64 6,426,000.00$170 900 153000condo 24 48 5,472,000.00$190 1200 228000Total 82 158 20,730,000.00$NonͲresidentialcommercial150office150community 50,000 10,000,000.00$200parking200 3,500,000.00$17,500parknride 200 3,500,000.00$17,500Total 400 17,000,000.00$ 604/05/125. AppendixImplementationGrandViewSmallAreaPlanDevelopmentProgramͲInfrastructureandStreetsLF Ac PrkSpaces Const$Mkt$Tax$sf/$ unit/sf unitcostInfrastructureVernon(*) 950 332,500.00$350crosswalk 5 25,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$EdenWest(*) 385 134,750.00$350EdenEast 200 70,000.00$350crosswalk 3 15,000.00$5000roadway 1,500,000.00$Jerrysstreet 875 306,250$350$GusYoungext(*) 150 52,500$350$OLGroad 150 52,500.00$350Bridges(EST)eachGͲViewCrossing 750,000.00$estCPRail 750,000.00$estsubtotal 5,488,500.00$HWY100Splitdiamond(est) $10,000,000Ped/Bike(est) 1,500,000.00$(*)ͲDoesnotincludebudgetsforroadwayimprovements/updgrades/reconstructionͲbudgetsareforlandscape/streetscapeonly 614/05/125. AppendixVernon and InterchangeTransportation 624/05/125. AppendixVernonTransportation 634/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 644/05/125. AppendixTransportationSplit Diamond 654/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesLibrary / Eden / LinkProposed Illustrative Plan (p.16)Alternative 1Alternative 2Alternative 3: Streetscape improvements 664/05/125. AppendixDesign AlternativesArcadia and Gus YoungProposed Illustrative Plan (p. 16) Alternative 1 Alternative 2 184/05/123. Patterns for a Neighborhood CenterLand Use Arcadia Avenue Looking North 1.Hope for Change Introduction Hope for Change has been the driving vision since the very beginning of this process that is now well into its second year of perspiration,participation, and planning.Thousands of volunteer hours, countless meetings, and hundreds of discussions (large and small)have demonstrated that a committed group of citizen stakeholders,business leaders and owners, and elected and appointed officials believe that hope for change must be proactive, progressive, and promoted. The result will be not just be change for the sake of change, but directed energy,policy,and investment that will deliver a place for people to live, work, shop, and play in sustainable,memorable ways. Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process,December 2010 64/05/12 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan ArcadiaAveHwy100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 154/05/12 Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use ArcadiaAveHwy100Illustrative M aster Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 164/05/12 Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center 274/05/12 Public Realm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeWFrontageRdSherwoodBrooksideDaleDr52nd St 51st St Public Realm /Open Space Diagram A.GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C.GrandView Crossing D.Arcadia Streetscape E.Gus Young Streetscape F.Arcade Connection G.Vernon Streetscape H.Eden Streetscape Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center ArcadiaAve324/05/12 Gus Young Ln Jerry’s Public Realm Vernon,Gus Young,Interlachen The plan recommends a number of street and traffic improvements that will provide greater predictability for the management of traffic, thereby creating a safer environment for bikes and pedestrians.This is made possible by building a new street (GrandView Crossing)and bridge (over the CP Rail corridor)that will connect Vernon east to Arcadia and then paired with Gus Young to create a one-way street pattern.Anchoring the public realm is the G r andView G reen,an approximately one-half +acre public space located on the north end of the public works site. 1.New street and bridge connection (GrandView Crossing). 2.GrandView Green public space and outdoor gathering area. 3.Gus Young (westbound)and GrandView Crossing (eastbound) are combined to create a one-way street pair. 4.Left turns from southbound Vernon to Gus Young are removed. 5.Improved pedestrian crossings on Vernon. 6.Complete Streets principles application would transfer Vernon into a 3-lane section with bike lanes and pedestrian improvements. 7.Pedestrian plaza/bridgehead and future bike/ pedestrian bridge connection over Highway 100. 8.Public steps of Arcadia. 1 GrandView Crossing 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 8SummitCommunity/ Civic Building City Parking Ramp 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Complete/Living Streets improvements Private streetscapes Split diamond interchange New /improved bridges 354/05/12 Transportation ArcadiaAveHwy100District Street Framework The movement framework for the District begins with addressing policy issues like the adoption of the Living Streets principles and applying Hennepin County’s Complete Streets policy, as well as considering larger and more long term ideas like reconstructing the Highway 100 interchange using a “split diamond” configuration. This approach accomplishes a number of objectives that meet the District Principles and provides an incremental approach to addressing change over time. The existing slip ramp location off the southbound ingress ramp would be retained but would be combined with an additional connection to Gus Young as part of the one way frontage road system. Traffic would be controlled at four signalized intersections. In the short term,there is an opportunity to begin implementing streetscape, bike, and pedestrian improvements. Another important recommendation is to implement the GrandView Crossing/Gus Young one-way street pair that will help manage traffic access and circulation in the upper core of the District. Site 3.Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West 374/05/12 Site Eden 100 Multi-Family March 24th 2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Sketch Plan Submittal Sketch Plan Submittal Contents Project Overview • Project Narrative • Site Overview • Development Data • Project Summary • Project Metrics • Project Team • Grandview District Framework Review • Current Zoning • Site Views • Site Images • Adjacent Spaces • Regional Amenities • Illustrative Site Plan • Amenity Plan • Floor Plans • Grading Plan • Utility Plan • Contextual Images • Perspective Images • Materials and Massing Images • Interior Amenity Spaces • Exterior Amenity Spaces Project Context Proposed Project Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Contents Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Overview Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Project Overview and Design Narrative Project Introduction Opus is pleased to share our sketch plan submittal with the City of Edina Planning Commission and City Council. The package includes visioning and conceptual design for the exciting new redevelopment opportunity at 5100 Eden Avenue. The proposed project will play a major role in the City’s future goals for the Grandview neighborhood. Opus is proposing a 138-unit multifamily project that activates the boulevard along Arcadia Avenue and maximizes the site’s full potential. In addition to providing luxury homes for future residents, the project will feature a class A amenity package with indoor parking, a bike valet, fitness, a work from home area and an expansive outdoor amenity space complete with a spa. Along with the building amenities for residents to enjoy, the public will benefit from the improved connection along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. The building frontage along Arcadia Avenue will feature an improved drive lane, new parallel parking stalls, a grassy boulevard, and a new and improved sidewalk for patrons. The newly constructed sidewalk will connect the neighborhood to nearby amenities in what is now an underutilized pedestrian area. Our team thoughtfully designed the building’s presence along this prominent avenue to synergize with the Grandview Project at 5146 Eden Avenue. The pedestrian experience along Eden Avenue will also be improved with lush, terraced landscaping between the sidewalk and the building. This site is an important puzzle piece to the overall goals for the Grandview District and we are excited to share our team’s vision. Site Overview 5100 Eden Avenue is made up of seven adjacent parcels totaling 1.38 acres on the northeast quadrant of Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There is an existing 38,678 SF office building on the site that was built in 1968. The current tenants are on short term leases or include rights to remove with notice. Office space is not as desirable as it once was, and the existing building is not in alignment with the City’s vision for the site. The site is currently zoned Planned Office District-1 and will seek to be rezoned as a Planned Unit Development to allow the project to maximize its full potential. Development Data The proposed building will be seven stories in height, with the lowest level only partially exposed along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue. There are two levels of enclosed parking in a precast structure containing a total of 171 parking stalls, and five stories of wood frame construction above. There will be three access points, with one being off Eden Avenue and two off Arcadia Avenue. The main entrance will be off Arcadia Avenue and will have four visitor parking stalls alongside a generous green space lawn to create a welcoming environment for the project within the neighborhood. The total building will be approximately 244,000 gross square feet and will feature 138 dwelling units with 10% of the units affordable for households earning 50% of the Area Median Income. The project will consist of a full amenity package, thoughtfully designed for the desires of future residents. An active lobby along Arcadia Avenue will have work from home spaces, a fitness space, and yoga room. There will also be a bike valet along with a dog wash and dog run. A second story amenity deck will have a spa, a turf area, and a grill area with seating. The sixth-floor amenity deck will provide additional space for resident enjoyment with dynamic views to City Hall and downtown Minneapolis. The site has approximately 16 feet of grade change from the Northwest corner to the Southwest corner, making this a challenging site. Opus has worked hard to mitigate these challenges and provide a vibrant project that responds to the district goals, the pedestrian experience, and the site forces, all the while maintaining a viable project. The exterior design will feature high class building materials such as high quality masonry, architectural wall cladding, architectural metal panels, generous glass, and plentiful balconies, all within a building form that respects and responds to the neighborhood. The building opens up toward Arcadia Avenue with an expansive front entry and exterior amenity package providing an enhanced pedestrian experience. The relief provided along this street responds well to the proposed development at the old Public Works site, and the two developments will provide a much-needed enhancement to Arcadia Avenue. The corners of the building anchor the structure to the site, but the design thoughtfully pulls back the mass in the middle. This is evident especially along Arcadia Avenue but also along Eden Avenue. The step-backs provide visual interest and relief for the public as they walk or drive by the site. Lush landscaping and terraced walls relieve some of the challenging topography, adding to the pedestrian experience. In addition, programming has been thoughtfully placed to activate the streetscape. Sustainability is a core tenant of Opus’s mission statement and will be incorporated into the design and execution of the project at every step. We intend to meet or exceed the requirements put forth by the city. Because of the small site size and healthy slope present, the development team is asking for relief on setbacks and height. Our goal is to work with the city on crafting a PUD that allows the project to move forward with the intent shown herein. Summary Opus is excited for the opportunity to be a part of the community’s overall vision for the Grandview neighborhood. In collaboration with our consultants and feedback from City staff, we believe the following package encapsulates the community’s desired outcome for the site. We look forward to working alongside the City of Edina and its stakeholders to drive this vision forward and build upon the city’s goals for this growing neighborhood. Project Overview and Narrative Applicant / Developer Architect Design Builder Opus Development Company 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus AE Group 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Opus Design Build 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 952-656-4444 Civil Engineer Landscape Architect Sambatek 12800 Whitewater Drive Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 763-476-6010 Damon Farber 310 South 4th Avenue Suite 7050 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612-332-7522 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Metrics Project Metrics Project Team Amenity/ Common Table 1 - Project Summary Lobby Area Notes: Level 6 A, R 31,042 31,042 891 25,164 650 3,728 2 4 11 17 Total Apartment GSF 181,201 Level 5 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Garage GSF 62,282 Level 4 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Total Project GSF 243,483 Level 3 R 31,986 31,986 891 26,740 3,728 3 18 8 1 30 Level 2 A, R 31,987 31,987 1,245 23,821 2,566 3,728 3 16 8 1 28 Level 2 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 5,998 Level 1 A, L, P 41,550 20,876 20,673 1,082 5,615 8,687 4,884 1 2 3 52 8 Level 2 Private Patios 3,217 Level P1 P 42,946 41,406 1,540 528 982 111 Level 6 Exterior Amenity Deck GSF 735 Total 243,483 62,282 181,201 6,419 134,820 11,903 24,506 12 72 37 17 138 163 8 Table 2 - Apartment Summary * Total GSF Includes Additional 2% Applied for Depth of Exterior Finish 9% 52% 27% 12% 100%Notes: ** Apt RSF Based on Exterior Face of Sheathing Goal Mix 10% 50% 40% 0% 100%Total Units 138 Typ. Floor Efficiency 84% (Rental SF / Gross SF) Total Stalls 171 P - Parking Parking Stall / Unit Ratio 1.24 R - Residential Levels Use Total GSF Garage GSF*Apt GSF* Shaft Apt RSF**Studio 1 BED 2 BED 2+ BED Units Parking L - Lobby Tandem Parking NOTE: Total parking excludes 4 visitor parking stalls. A - Amenity Proposed Mix Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Project Context Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Leverage publicly owned parcels Leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected District that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. This project, while not leveraging publicly-owned parcels, will create a presence within the community and enhance the vibrancy and connectedness that is so desired in today’s urban cores. The project responds to the future bike/pedestrian path connecting to City Hall and the park to the west, as well as enhances the pedestrian experience through thoughtful landscaping and site terracing. Meet the needs of businesses and residents Enhance the District’s economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the District a good place to do business. The District currently houses many different types of businesses, goods and services. The proposed development at the corner of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue will build upon the economic vitality of the district by adding residents at the heart of this mix. This project will build upon a direct synergy between businesses and residents that is just now growing in the district. The project is designed to respond to a future proposed pedestrian/bike bridge connecting City Hall to the development to the west and Jerry’s ramp. The opportunity for multi-modal movement within the district will be enhanced with the proposed project and adjacencies, and will allow this project - and the district - to adapt and respond to the future. Turn barriers into opportunities Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. The site currently has a healthy slope from the North side down to the Southwest corner, and is bordered by Hwy 100 on the east and an on-ramp spur to the north. We utilize the elements to our advantage with our proposed project by partially burying the lowest level within the site and exposing the level only when necessary for access. The highway provides unobstructed open space next to the site which will allow for expansive views from the residential units. Grandview District Review 6 on since ow well pation, rs, sions usiness ted be result hange, that will p, and Concept Diagram from the Small Area Guide Plan Process, December 2010 Pursue logical increments; make vibrant walkable and attractive Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life-filled place. The proposed project will include an affordable housing aspect to meet the needs of residents within the district. An enhanced pedestrian experience is at the heart of the building siting, location and design addressing the ever growing multi-nodal transportation experience that is so relevant in today’s cities. A bike valet is also included on the north side of the project in anticipation of a connective corridor from city hall, across highway 100, to the new park on the west side of the Arcadia Avenue. All this meets the current and future goals of the Grandview District becoming an urban node where one can live, work, and play. Organize parking; provide convenience Organize parking as an effective resource for the District by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. Our parking is provided fully on site for both residents and guests. All residents will have indoor parking within the building, while spaces dedicated for future tenants are provided at the front entry. Along with resident, guest, and future tenant parking, we are proposing public, on-street parking along the west side of our site to serve the local shops and services. Improve movement for all ages; facilitate multiple modes of movement Improve movement within and access to the District for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. The pedestrian experience along Arcadia Avenue and Eden Avenue have been greatly enhanced through thoughtful building placement and massing. In addition, landscaping and land terracing is enhanced to provide relief and reprieve for those using public sidewalks. Additional parking is proposed to alleviate congestion, and the future bike/pedestrian trail is considered in our design. Identity and unique sense of place; be sustainable and innovative Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina’s innovative development heritage. The project will feature a Class A amenity package and experience for the residents who live there. Beautifully articulated design and high class materials will present the project as a destination within the district. Sustainability is one of Opus’s core values and will be infused in the project from the beginning. Finally, the pedestrian experience in the public realm will be greatly enhanced. Grandview District Guiding Principles Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review 374/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Highway 100 and West Frontage Road Looking West Vernon A v e Eden A v e Hwy 100 Figure 3.1 Long Term Changes Master Plan showing Focus Areas throughout the Grandview District and beyond. CHAPTER IntroductionFocus Areas 3 City Hall VERNON AVEHIGHWAY 100GRANGE RDARCADIA AVEEDEN A V E GRANDVIEW SQ SHERWOOD RD52ND ST INTERLACHEN BLVD 50T H S T 1 2 3 4 5 4 6 11 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 (12) (12) 164/05/12 Land Use Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100Illustrative Master Plan Existing Buildings Potential Development Proposed Civic Community Buildings 15 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100ercial Residential 154/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Land Use Land Use Plan Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Offi ce Medium/High Density Residential 274/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Public Realm A. GrandView Commons B. GrandView Steps C. GrandView Crossing D. Arcadia Streetscape E. Gus Young Streetscape F. Arcade Connection G. Vernon Streetscape H. Eden Streetscape A B C D F H H G E Vernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale DrE. Frontage Rd52nd St 51st St Public Realm / Open Space Diagram 424/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Bicycle Improvements Transportation Primary bike routes Secondary bike routes Trail (on CP ROW)Vernon AveEden A v e Arcadia AveHwy 100Bike lanes are shown for Vernon, a secondary bike route, and Eden, a primary bike route, through the District. Th e lanes are shown with enhanced paint and striping as well as additional lane area. A potential bike facility using the CP Rail right-of- way or adjacent land could connect Eden, at grade, to Brookside, thereby providing an off -road option to move through the District. 384/05/12 3. Patterns for a Neighborhood Center Transportation Parking • Consider the use of the current city parking ramp (located behind Jerry’s) to accommodate future park and ride patrons and general parking district supply; increase the capacity of this structure in the future if economically possible/ practical. • Th e public works site should be considered as a location for a Metro Transit park and ride facility as a way to provide parking to weekly commuters and to provide parking for a community/civic building, public green, residences and other uses. In addition, the top level (deck) of this structure is intended to serve as the GrandView Green, the major public realm amenity in the district. • Additional parking (structure) is proposed to the south and contiguous to Jerry’s grocery store to provide better service access to the loading area and provide additional parking supply. Parking beneath buildings New access to existing Surface lots Existing ramp Direction of traffi cVernon AveEden A v eArcadia AveHwy 100P P Enhance the pedestrian experience Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontage Arcadia Avenue is the primary frontageOriginally thought of as Mixed Use Bike Routes are a key component to the neighborhood Parking should be hidden as best as possible Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grandview District Review Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Current Zoning ©LOGIS 2013, Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCR Current Zoning Class The site is currently zoned POD-1 Planned Office given its current use. The intent is to rezone the site to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) and establish specific zoning language for the proposed project. Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 Districts R-1 - Single Dwelling Unit R-2 - Double Dwelling Unit PRD-3 - Planned Residence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 3/22/2023, 12:54:36 PM 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 g Unit ng Unit esidence PRD-4 - Planned Residence PCD-2 - Planned Commercial PCD-4 - Planned Commercial POD-1 - Planned Office PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 |Three Rivers Park District, Esri Canada, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS, METI/NASA, EPA, USDA, ©LOGIS 2013 sidence mmercial mmercial ice PID - Planned Industrial PUD - Planned Unit Development PSR-4 - Planned Residence MDD-4 - Mixed Development 0 0.07 0.140.04 mi 0 0.1 0.20.05 km 1:4,514 Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, EPA | ©LOGIS 2013 | Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Site Views Proposed Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Existing Site Images From Corner From Sidewalk From Parking Lot From Parking Lot From Southeast Parking Lot Entrance From Sidewalk From Sidewalk From Northwest Lot Corner GrandviewYard 5146 Eden Avenue SouthEdina, MN 55436 07-25-2022 #75372-22075 SHEET 38 RENDERING #1 RESTAURANT AERIAL FROM SOUTHWEST COVER SHEETGRANDVIEW YARDRESTAURANTSENIOR COOPERATIVEAERIAL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST*NOTE: RENDERINGS ARE STYLIZED ILLUSTRATIONS. REFER TO DRAWINGS FOR SPECIFIC DESIGN ELEMENTS. RW - Eden Ave, Edina MN New Concept - Rendering Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Adjacent Spaces Our Lady of Grace Edina OffiCenter The Hilltop Restaurant Retail Center Proposed Restaurant Proposed Senior Coop 4917 Eden Avenue Multi-Family Edina City Hall Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Regional Amenities Local Amenities Medical Facilities Grocery and Convenience Stores Postal Services Educational Institutions Edina Cahill Historical School Our Lady of Grace Catholic School Highlands Elementary School Civic Facilities Edina City Hall Edina Police Department Edina Hennepin County Library Funeral Home Religious Institution Parks and Recreational Areas Edina Parks Recreation Edina Country Club Utley Park Wooddale Park Arden Park Arden Park Rink Todd Park Highlands Park Garden Park Browndale Park Site Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Proposed Project Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Illustrative Site Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Level 2 Amenity Plan Proposed Residential Building Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Lower Level Garage and Parking Floor Plan Legend Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 1 Garage and Parking 5’ 5’ 7’ 11’ Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 2 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 3-5 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Studio Residential Units 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Floor Plan Level 6 Floor Plan Legend Service Spaces Horizontal Circulation Vertical Circulation Amenity Spaces 1-Bedroom Residential Units 2-Bedroom Residential Units Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Grading Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Utility Plan Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Contextual Views Northwest Perspective Southwest Perspective Northeast Perspective Southeast Perspective Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views West Perspective View South Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Perspective Views East Perspective View North Perspective View Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Building Materials and Massing Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Exterior Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN 03-24-2023 Character Images - Interior Amenities Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2023-___ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ADD PUD-25, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-25, AT 5146 EDEN AVENUE The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-517 Planned Unit Development District-25 (PUD-25) – Eden 100 (a) Legal description: (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on June 23, 2023 ________ except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2023-__ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: Within the approved retail space: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multifamily Residential Parks (d) Accessory Uses: None (e) Conditional Uses: None Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 (f) Development Standards. (g) Signs for the retail space shall be regulated per the PCD-2 Zoning District and for the residential use the PRD Zoning District. (h) The residential housing on the site shall include 10% of all the dwelling units (14 units) to meet the City’s definition of affordable housing at the time of approval. Proposed (Measured from building to the lot line) Building Setbacks to the perimeter lot line - Residential Front – South (Eden Avenue) Front – West (Arcadia Avenue) Side – North Rear – East 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 12 feet Density 100 units per acre Building Height 7 stories and 82 feet Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 68% 3.2% Parking Stalls – Residential (136 units) & 3,363 s.f. retail 165 spaces First floor building height 13 feet First floor transparency and building material Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. Transparency - 75% Commercial and 35% residential Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 3 Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ _____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of _______, 2023, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 20 23. ________________________________ City Clerk EdinaMN.gov Preliminary Rezoning, Site Plan and Plat 5100 Eden Avenue Site Site Land Use Public Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-use Center Office Medium/High Density Residential 3.Patterns foraNeighborhoodCenter 27 4/05/12 PublicRealm C A D B F H H G E ArcadiaAveHwy100HankersonSummitSunnyslopeW Frontage RdSherwoodBrooksideDale Dr 52nd St 51st St PublicRealm/OpenSpaceDiagram A. GrandView Commons B.GrandView Steps C. GrandViewCrossing D. ArcadiaStreetscape E.GusYoungStreetscape F.ArcadeConnection G.Vernon Streetscape H. Eden Streetscape Site Sketch Plan Sketch Plan Sketch Plan Revisions from Sketch Plan Increased building setbacks. (Now 10 feet on all sides. At sketch plan the building was as close as 4-5 feet on Arcadia and Eden.) Reduced the mass of the building by fully burying the parking structure. (First level of parking was above grade at sketch plan.) Building now has active street frontage including walk out units. Added a commercial space in the northwest corner of the building including a outdoor patio. Added the “Arcadia art walk” public park in the front of the building. Expanded the sidewalk network to include sidewalks on the north and east side of the building. Eliminated the vehicular access off Eden Avenue, and one access off Arcadia. Added building step backs away from the street. Enhanced landscaping. This Request Requires: A Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD, Planned Unit Development. The PUD would ensure that the affordable housing is included within the project, and that the Sustainable Buildings Policy is met. In return for providing affordable housing and a building that meets the Sustainable Buildings Policy, the applicant is requesting flexibility to the underlying POD standards including building height, building material, building transparency, first floor ceiling height, building setbacks on all sides, floor area ratio and building coverage. The PUD rezoning is the tool used by the City to ensure compliance with the sustainable building policy and ensure affordable housing. Site Plan and Subdivision/Replat. Review of Site Plan: City Standard (POD) Comp. Plan Proposed (Measured to lot line) Building Setbacks to the lot line - Residential Front – Eden Avenue Front - Arcadia Avenue Side – North Rear – East 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 35 feet or building height (69-82 feet) 10 feet* (45 feet to curb) 10 feet* & 34 feet 10 feet* 12 feet* Density 20-100 units/acre 100 units per acre Building Height Four Stories and 48 feet Seven Stories & 82 feet* Building Coverage Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 30% .50% 68%* 3.2%* Parking Stalls – Residential Residential – 1.25 spaces per unit = 170 spaces Retail – 1 space per 250 s.f. = 13 spaces (10% reduction due to 90 indoor bike stalls) Total Required = 166 spaces (includes the 10% reduction for providing 90 long-term enclosed bike parking) 183 spaces First floor building height 20 feet 13-14 feet* Proximity to R-1 District 4 times building height – 328 feet 830 feet First floor transparency and building material Brick or Stone on the first 60 feet of a building facing the public realm. 75% transparency on first level facing the public realm. Per the plans. Brick 60 feet tall on corners and base* 75% Commercial and 40% residential* Primary Issue  Is the proposal reasonable to justify PUD rezoning for this site? Staff has provided the Commission with alternatives to consider for approval and denial of the request. An argument can be made for and against the proposed development. The City has complete discretion to approve or deny. Primary Issue Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; The site is located adjacent to a freeway an arterial, and a collector roadway. There is right-of-way on all four sides of the site. The closest single-family home is over 800 feet away on the other side of Highway 100. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center,” which allows for residential, retail, and public space. By introducing more residential uses in this primarily retail area would enhance and vitalize the existing businesses, increase pedestrian movement in the area, and increase the number of transit users. Primary Issue b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing on the site. There would be no surface parking on the site, pedestrian movement around the site would be made safer with boulevard style sidewalks and an alternative route around the building on the east and west side. As mentioned, adding more residents in the area could enhance the economic viability in the district. c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; Variations to land use regulations are requested to offset the costs for the provision of city goals including the provision of affordable housing, building a sustainable building (per the City’s policy) well beyond the requirements of the building code, and providing underground parking (no surface parking included). Additional items included in the plans from the list above includes enhanced landscaping, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, podium height on Arcadia and provision of a public park. Primary Issue d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; The proposed building would be high-quality brick, architectural cladding, glass, and metal panel accents. The building would be constructed to meet the Sustainable Buildings Policy which increases the quality of the design. Staff would, however, recommend as a condition of approval that the first 60 feet in elevation of the building be made of brick to meet the City Code requirement for building materials. e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; The project would maintain the efficiency of public streets and utilities. f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; The existing site is primarily paved parking with the office building. There are a handful of trees that would be removed, but replaced with more, and higher quality trees, including boulevard trees to enhance the pedestrian experience. Primary Issue g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; The project provides a mixture of uses on the site, including housing, retail, and park. h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and The project would provide 10% of the units (14 units) within the building for affordable housing for families earning 50% area median income (AMI) for the Twin Cities. These units would help the City of Edina achieve its goal with the Met Council of creating 1,804 units by the year 2030. i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. As mentioned, this site is located adjacent to roadways on all sides including Highway 100, an off ramp, and a collector roadway. This site begins the transition into the commercial node. Primary Issue Primary Issue 4. The project provides additional public realm in the area with the public park along Arcadia Avenue. 5. The commercial area provides an outdoor patio to activate the street along with the public park. 6. Parking would be hidden underneath the building. 7. The proposed height of seven stories is reasonable for this site. To provide affordable housing within this project, and meet the City’s sustainable building policy, the additional height and density is needed to create more market rate units to help absorb the additional costs. The proposed height of the building would not exceed the height of the Jerry’s office building, which has been seen as the maximum height benchmark in the Grandview District. This site is located adjacent to roadways on all sides including Highway 100, an off ramp, and a collector roadway. This site begins the transition into the commercial node. Primary Issue 8. The proposal would create a more efficient and creative use of the property than existing. 9. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center,” which allows for residential, and retail uses as proposed. Staff Recommendation Eden 100 Multi-Family June 22nd 2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Site Plan / PUD Submittal July 26th Eden 100 Multi-Family Illustrative Site Plan PROPOSED 7STORY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE FUTURESENIOR CO-OP “APPLEWOOD POINTE” FUTUREPARK AND RESTAURANT PROPOSED PUBLICPARK PROPOSEDPEDESTRIANWALK AND BIKELANE RETAIL PATIO SINGLE STORY RETAIL SERVICE ENTRANCE PARKING ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE PARKBENCH PARKBENCH BIKEFIXITSTATION AMENITY DECK PATIO NTS HIGHWAY 100ARCADIA AVENUE Edina, MN 07-26-2023 SIDEWALKSIDEWALKPUBLIC ART PARKPRIVATE AMENITY DECKRESIDENTIAL UNITSGREENSPACEARCADIA AVENUEGREEN BOULEVARD Eden 100 Multi-Family East /West Site SectionThrough Amenities Showing Public Spaces Edina, MN 07-26-2023 SIDEWALKSIDEWALKPUBLIC PLAZARETAIL PATIOACTIVATED AMENITYRETAILARCADIA AVENUEHWY 100 RAMPGREEN BOULEVARDGREEN BOULEVARD Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Street SectionThrough Amenities Showing Pedestrian Experience 07-26-2023 SIDEWALKRETAIL PATIORETAILUPPER LEVELRESIDENT AMENITYARCADIA AVENUEGREEN BOULEVARD Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Street SectionThrough Amenities Showing Stepbacks and Retail 07-26-2023 GREEN BOULEVARDEDENAVENUEOPEN GREEN SPACESIDEWALKEden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Street SectionThrough Eden Showing Green Space 07-26-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Rendered View from Roundabout 07-26-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Rendered View from Southeast 07-26-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Rendered View from Northeast 07-26-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Rendered View from West 07-26-2023 Eden 100 Multi-Family Edina, MN Rendered View from Northwest 07-26-2023 LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" ANGLED IN VIEW NOWALLCLADDING WINDOWS,TRIM, CANOPY,FRAMINGELEMENTS BRICK=911SF WALLAREA=943SF BRICK - 96.6% 1029SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDINGFOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION WALLAREA=1670SF BRICK=1437SF BRICK - 86.0% WINDOW,TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMINGELEMENTS60'-0"RESIDENTAMENITY DECK 997SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:7/25/20233:45:41PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations Materials MT-01 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 07/26/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1 West Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Courtyard Elevation Materials TOTALWALLCLADDING AREA = 22,696 SF MATERIAL PERCENTAGES: THE ABOVENUMBERS ARE ACOMPOSITEOFALL SIDES OF THE PROJECTASSHOWNIN THE SUBSEQUENT DIAGRAMS. LIGHT BLUE REPRESENTSTOTAL WALLAREA,ORANGE REPRESENTSBRICK WALLAREA,GREEN REPRESENTSBRICK WALLCLADDINGNOT COUNTED TOWARDTHE CITY REQUIREMENT. ALL AREASTAKEN FROM GRADEVERTICALLYTO 60'. ITEMS NOT INCLUDEDIN THE CALCULATIONS: • WINDOWSAND WINDOW TRIM • CANOPIES • METAL FRAMINGELEMENTS • ELEVATIONSSTEPPED BACKFROM THE PEDESTRIAN EXPERIENCE • ELEVATIONSFACINGTOWARDRESIDENTAMENITIES BRICK WALLCLADDING AREA = 11,811 SF BRICK PERCENTAGE = 52.0% BRICK WALLCLADDING NOT COUNTEDTOWARD THE CITY REQUIREMENT= 5,775 SF DIFFERENCE: 10,885 SF DIFFERENCE: 5,110 SF LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" L EVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" SEECOURTYARD ELEVATIONS ANGLED IN VIEW BRICK=845SF WALLAREA=1866SF BRICK - 45.3% WINDOW,TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMINGELEMENTS60'-0"459SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" L EVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" SEE WESTELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW60'-0"BRICK=3735SF WALLAREA=7617SF WINDOW,TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMINGELEMENTS BRICK - 49.0% 622SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:7/25/20233:45:44PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations Materials MT-02 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 07/26/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1 Southwest Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 South Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2 113' - 6" L EVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" SEE SOUTH ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 60'-0"BRICK=1290SF WALLAREA=4433SF TRIM FRAMINGELEMENTS BRICK - 29.1% 166SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" BRICK=3310SF WALLAREA=5884SF WINDOW,TRIM, CANOPY, FRAMINGELEMENTS BRICK - 56.3% 266SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:7/25/20233:45:48PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations Materials MT-03 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 07/26/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1 East Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDINGFOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION TRIM FRAMINGELEMENTS BRICK - 100% AREA=283 SF RESIDENTAMENITY DECK PARK 2210SF WALL AREA -NOTCOUNTED OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:7/25/20233:45:51PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations Materials MT-04 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 07/26/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1 South Courtyard Elevation Materials 1/16" = 1'-0" 40.1 39.7 ARCADIAAVENUE150'-0" LEGEND EDEN AVE ACCESS ROUNDABOUT ACCESS ARCADIAACCESS ON-RAMP ACCESS Opus AEGroup, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus Design Build,L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE: 7/19/2023 2:52:16 PM SHEET TITLE Fire Access Plan FA01 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 07/19/2023 PROJECT MANAGER SS DRAWN BY Author CHECKED BY Checker ISSUE RECORD 1" = 20'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 Fire Hose Path SITE HIGHWAY100Opus Design Build,L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AEGroup, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE: 7/20/2023 11:27:20 AM SHEET TITLE Cover Page 1/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECT MANAGER SS DRAWN BY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUE RECORD 6/23/23 SitePlan Review * Total GSF IncludesAdditional2% Appliedfor Depth of ExteriorFinish Proposed Mix 4% 4% 40% 10% 20% 18% 4% 100% ** Apt RSF Basedon ExteriorFace of Sheathing Average UnitSize 643 760 775 950 1196 1411 1448 A - Amenity L - Lobby P - Parking R - Residential Levels Use Total GSF Garage GSF* Retail GSF Apt GSF* Shaft Apt RSF** Amenity/ Lobby Common Area Studio Alcove 1 BED 1 BED + 2 BED 2 BED + PENTHSE 2 BED + Units Standard Parking Compact Parking Tandem Parking Level 7 A, R 27,061 27,061 1,009 21,455 1,035 3,031 5 1 2 3 6 17 Level 6 R 30,572 30,572 1,009 26,099 2,865 1 1 11 2 6 5 26 Level 5 R 30,572 30,572 1,009 26,099 2,865 1 1 11 2 6 5 26 Level 4 R 30,572 30,572 1,009 26,099 2,865 1 1 11 2 6 5 26 Level 3 A, R 30,572 30,572 1,009 26,099 2,865 1 1 11 2 6 5 26 Level 2 A, L, P, R 33,228 3,364 29,864 788 13,759 5,482 9,249 2 1 5 4 1 2 15 Level 1 L, A,P 42,647 35,540 7,107 877 5,693 398 79 3 1 Level P1 P 42,000 36,487 5,512 5,404 89 6 5 Total 267,225 72,027 3,364 191,833 6,710 139,610 12,210 29,542 6 5 54 13 27 25 6 136 168 9 6 APPLICANT: OPUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RDWEST, MINNETONKA, MN55343-0110 CONTACT: NICKMURNANE (952) 656-4444 Zoning Existing Proposed District POD-1:PlannedOffice District-1 PUD: PlannedUnit District Use Office Multiple-Unit Dwelling, Commercial ZoneLot Size 59,402SF 1.36Acres Numberof DwellingUnits Unit Breakdown 136Units Studio:6, Alcove: 5, 1-BDRM:54,1-BDRM+:13,2-BDRM:27, 2-BDRM+:25, Penthouse 2-BDRM+:6 Max. Building Coverage Allowed 30%of tract Provided 68% Max. F.A.R. Allowed 0.5of tract Provided 4.5 Building Height Allowed 4 stories/ 48' Provided 7 stories/ 76' Building Setback Required Provided Front 35'.Above 35'in height,the setbackwill 10' increaseto match buildingheight. Interior Side 20'.Above 35'in height,the setbackwill 10' increaseto match buildingheight. Street Side 35'.Above 35'in height,the setbackwill 10' increaseto matchbuildingheight Rear 20'.Above 35'in height,the setbackwill 10' increaseto match buildingheight. Parkingand Loading Required Provided Dwelling,MultipleUnit At least1.25spacesper dwellingunit but no more than 1.75spacesper dwellingunit 1.13per dwellingunit Standard(Includedin Total) Compact(Includedin Total) Tandem (Includedin Total) Accessible (Includedin Total) EV Level 2 ChargerInstalled(Includedin Total)5% 108stalls 6 stalls 6 stalls 3 stalls 10.9%(20 stalls) EV Level 2 ChargerReady (Includedin Total)10%5.5%(10stalls) TotalParkingSpaces WITHOUTReductions 170 stallsMinimum;238 Maximum 153 Transit Reductions Reduction Qualification One covered, long-term bicycle parkingspace per three dwellingunits.(33% total) ProposedQualifications 90 covered, long-term bicycle parkingstallsprovided.(66% total) Reduction Amount 10%(17 stalls) Total ResidentialWITHOUTReductions TotalResidentialWITH Reductions 170stalls 170-17(10%)= 153stalls 153stalls Restaurant Atleast1space for each 100SF of indoor floorarea,plusone space for each employee on the majorshiftand one space for each loadingdock. 1space for each 100 SF of indoorspace. Standard(Includedin Total) Compact(Includedin Total) Accessible (Includedin Total) TotalParkingSpaces 24stalls 3 stalls 3 stalls 30stalls AlternativeUser for RestaurantSpace Retail TotalParking SpacesWITHOUGreductions Atleast1 space per 250 SF 14-33Stalls 14stallsper 250SF 30Stalls Transit Reductions Reduction Qualification One shortterm bike space per 5,000SF of retail/servicesuses. (7 total) ProposedQualifications 8short term bike spaces Reduction Amount 10%(3 stalls) Total Retail/Rest.WITHOUTReductions TotalRetail/Rest.WITH Reductions 33 33-3 (10%)= 30stalls 30stalls TotalProject Parking Spaces 183Stalls Residential Loading 0 1 SmallBerth,to be sharedwith Retail RetailLoading 0 1 Small Berth,to be sharedwithResidential Residential BicycleParking 0 90 covered,longterm spaces RetailBicycle Parking 0 8 shortterm spaces SURVEYOR: SUNDE LAND SURVEYING ADDRESS: 9001 EBLOOMINGTON FWY#118 BLOOMINGTON,MN55420 CONTACT: ARLEE CARLSON (952) 881-2455 CIVIL ENGINEERING: SAMBATEK, INC. ADDRESS: 12800 WHITEWATERDR. #300, MINNETONKA,MN55343 CONTACT: MARK ANDERSON (763) 476-6010 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DAMONFARBERLANDSCAPEARCHITECTS ADDRESS: 310 S4THAVESUITE7050, MINNEAPOLIS, MN55415 CONTACT: JESSE SYMYNKYWICZ (612) 332-7522 ARCHITECT: OPUS AEGROUP, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RDWEST, MINNETONKA, MN55343-0110 CONTACT: THEOGROTHE (952) 656-4444 GENERAL CONTRACTOR: OPUS DESIGNBUILD, L.L.C. ADDRESS: 10350 BREN RDWEST, MINNETONKA, MN55343-0110 CONTACT: GEORGE PARRINO (952) 656-4444 Eden 100 Multi-Family Site Plan Review Set 22 22 TREE PROTECTION FENCE EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING TREE LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION CAL/SIZE TYPE STATUS MAPLE DEMO MAPLE DEMO T-01 DEMO 9 T-02 DEMO 14 T-01 T-02 TREE PROTECTION FENCING T-03 T-06 T-05 T-03 DEMO 14 SPRUCE DEMO T-04 T-04 DEMO 12 SPRUCE PRESERVE T-05 DEMO 14 SPRUCE PRESERVE T-06 DEMO 14 SPRUCE PRESERVE T-03 NORTH 0 SCALE: 1"=20' 20' 40'60' OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET NUMBER PLOTDATE:6/8/2023 5:57:37PMPROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/21/2023 PROJECT MANAGER JS DRAWNBY BMS CHECKED BY ISSUERECORD I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Registration# Signature Date 9/22 SHEET TITLE TreePreservation Plan 1 - AR 1 - AR 1 - TB 1 - TB 1 - TB 4 - QE 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AR 1 - AR 1 - AR 1 - TB 1 - TB 1 - TB 1 - AR 1 - TB 1 - TB 1 - AR 1 - TB 1 - TB 3 - QE 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - TB 1 - AG 1 - AG 1 - AG 2,777 sf - SOD 1,752 sf - SOD 3,258 sf - SOD 28 sf -SOD 280 sf - SOD 374 sf - SOD 1 - AG 1 - TB 1 - AG TREES CODE AR QTY 7 BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ACER RUBRUM / RED MAPLE SIZE 5.5" CAL. REMARKS AG 14 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' / AUTUMN BRILLIANCE APPLE SERVICEBERRY 2.5" CAL. QE 7 QUERCUS X 'CRIMSCHMIDT' / CRIMSON SPIRE™OAK 3.5" CAL TB 12 TILIA AMERICANA 'BOULEVARD' / BOULEVARD AMERICAN LINDEN 4.5" CAL. SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING REMARKS CK 98 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' / KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #5 36" o.c. CM 104 CAREX MUSKINGUMENSIS / PALM SEDGE #5 24" o.c. DL 73 DIERVILLA LONICERA / DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 48" o.c. EC 151 ECHINACEA PURPUREA / PURPLE CONEFLOWER #5 24" o.c. RG 15 RHUS AROMATICA 'GRO-LOW' / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 60" o.c. RH 39 RUDBECKIA HIRTA / BLACK-EYED SUSAN #5 36" o.c. TT 34 TAXUS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' / TAUNTON'S ANGLO-JAPANESE YEW #5 54" o.c. GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING REMARKS SOD 8,966 SF SOD SOD PLANT SCHEDULE NORTH 0 SCALE: 1"=20' 20' 40'60' 10/22 LandscapePlan OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER PLOTDATE: 6/8/2023 5:57:37PMPROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/21/2023 PROJECT MANAGER JS DRAWNBY BMS CHECKED BY ISSUERECORD I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Registration# Signature Date NORTH 0 SCALE: 1"=20' 20' 40'60' OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET NUMBER PLOTDATE:6/8/2023 5:57:37PMPROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/21/2023 PROJECT MANAGER JS DRAWNBY BMS CHECKED BY ISSUERECORD I hereby certify that this document was prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Name Registration# Signature Date 11/22 SHEET TITLE LandscapeDetails 1 1 36" RADIUS DIG PLANTING PIT4" TO 6" DEEPERTHAN ROOT BALL NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO PLANTS AND SOIL PREPARATION. EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT ( 1" DIA. OR LARGER)2EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOT BALL, SLOPED 6' DIAMETER MULCH RING 4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN PREPARED PLANTING SOIL PER SPEC 4" ORGANIC MULCH; DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE DETAIL - TREE PLANTING 3/4" = 1'-0" PROVIDE & INSTALL RODENT PROTECTION. 1"2HARDWIRE CLOTH MESH CYLINDER, 8" DIA. OR GREATER X 36" HGT; STAKE IN PLACE. PER SPEC P-ED-011 PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED PREPARE BEDA MIN. 4" DEEPERTHAN ROOT BALL 12" MIN. SPACING DETAIL - SHRUB PLANTING 1" = 1'-0" SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE APPLICATION OF PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE 3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN PLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBS P-ED-022 PREPARE PLANTING SOIL FOR THE ENTIRE BED 1'-6"6" MIN.SPACING SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL PLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL HAVE ROOTSH AND LOOSENED EDGE CONDITION VARIES; REFER TO PLAN UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 3" MULCH; DO NOT PLACE IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM DETAIL - PERENNIAL PLANTING 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 P-ED-04 HOLD FINISHED GRADE 1/2" BELOW EDGER- SEE PLAN FOR EDGE CONDITION 3/16" METAL EDGER W/ STAKE PLANTING AREA- SEE PLANTING PLAN TURF- SEE PLANTING PLAN DETAIL - STEEL EDGER 1 1/2" = 1'-0"P-ED-094 GARAGE 35772SF 140SF COMMON MECH. 252SF COMMON 375SF TENANTSTORAGE 1103SF WATERENTRY 646SF 1680SF TENANTSTORAGE MECH. 468SF +/-911.5 PRIVATEASSIGNED PARKINGAREA- 100 STALLS T TTT +/-911.5+/- 909.0 3%RAMPDN T10.0%5.0%(INCLU. 5 TANDEM+ 6 COMPACT STALLS)RAMPDNEV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EV LEVEL 2 CHARGER INSTALLED EVLEVEL2CHARGERREADYSHEETPILE FOUNDATION ELEV. STAIR ELEV. STAIR OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE LevelP1 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:24PM12/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 2 LEVEL P1 0' 40'10' 20' LOBBY/LEASING GARAGE 34843SF MECH. 252SF WORKFROMHOME 2482SF MAIL 590SF 683SF PACKAGE 1938SF +/-921.5 SENIOR CO- OP PARKING GARAGE GARAGE BELOW RESIDENTBY PERMITPARKINGONLY APT. GUESTSTALLS SHARED PARKINGAREA- 49 STALLS (14 APARTMENTSTALLS+ 35 RETAIL STALLS)+/-921.5POOL ABOVE SECURE GATE+/-921.5+/-919.0HUDDLES 5.0%T (INCLUDES1 TANDEM) 24' - 0" RECESSED PC PLANKABOVE 3%RAMPDN RAMPDN+/-919.0 ELEV. COMMON 146SF STAIR PRIVATEASSIGNED PARKINGAREA- 34STALLS ELEV. STAIR AWNING ABOVE CONF. CONF. OFFICEOFFICEWORK- ROOM RR OFFICE VEST. VEST. 10' -13/8" SHEETPILE FOUNDATION RESIDENTBY PERMITPARKING ONLY TRANSFER BEAM ABOVE EVLEVEL2 CHARGER INSTALLED + RESIDENTBY PERMITPARKING ONLY OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE Level1 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:25PM13/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 2 LEVEL 1 0' 40'10' 20' PARKBENCH PARKBENCH 1BR 855SF RETAIL 3364SF 2BR+ 1439SF 2BR 1201SF STUDIO 545SF ALCOVE 770SF 1BR 852SF 1BR 756SF 1BR+ 955SF 1BR+ 1012SF 1BR+ 967SF 2BR+ 1387SF 1BR 756SF 1BR+ 967SF STUDIO 541SF COMMON 5396SF AMENITY 1625SF DOGWASH 200SF BIKEVALET 777SF FITNESS 1683SF YOGA 584SF MAINELEC. 598SF GENERATOR 403SF CABANAS 613SF POOLEQUIP. 313SF LOADING 1405SF SENIOR CO-OP GARAGE BELOWGARAGE BELOW PUBLIC POCKET ART PARK 8'WIDE PEDESTRIAN WALK ANDBIKEWAY SERVICE DRIVE GARAGE ENTRY DRIVE RETAIL PATIO +/-935 EXTERIOR DECK 7126SF +/-935 10' PROPOSED SETBACK 3.5' STEP 23' - 0" RETAIL PATIO +/-931.5+/-935JAN. RR RR ELEC. DATA DATA ELEC. ELEV. STAIR ELEV. STAIR 3.5' STTRAESPH 1134SF +/-931.5 SPA RR 1BR 756SF JAN. RR SHWR 10' -25/8"20'-0" 90 STALLS BIKEFIXIT STATION OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE Level2 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:27PM14/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 2 LEVEL 2 0' 40'10' 20' 1BR 855SF 2BR+ 1473SF 1BR 721SF 2BR+ 1327SF 1BR 855SF 2BR 1207SF 2BR+ 1440SF 1BR+ 967SF 2BR 1201SF 1BR 756SF 1BR 758SF 2BR 1230SF 1BR 756SF 2BR+ 1438SF 2BR+ 1392SF 1BR+ 915SF 2BR 1213SF 1BR 754SF 1BR 756SF 1BR 683SF STUDIO 693SF 2BR 1210SF 2BR 1128SF 1BR 763SF ALCOVE 758SF 1BR 855SF COMMON 2864SF SENIOR CO-OP ELEC. DATA DATA ELEC. TRASH ELEV. STAIR ELEV. STAIR RETAILROOF BELOW AMENITY DECKBELOW 49' -6" OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE Levels3-6 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:29PM15/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 2 LEVEL 3 0' 40'10' 20' PENTHOUSE 1903SF EXTERIOR DECK 735SF 2BR+ 1439SF 2BR+ 1391SF PENTHOUSE 1550SF 2BR+ 1326SF 1BR 756SF 1BR 683SF 1BR 683SF 1BR 855SF 1BR 855SF 1BR+ 915SF 2BR 1210SF 2BR 1117SF PENTHOUSE 1728SF PENTHOUSE 1828SF PENTHOUSE 1811SF PENTHOUSE 1406SF CLUBROOM 733SF COMMON 3031SF DINING 302SF SENIOR CO-OP ELEC. DATA DATA ELEC. TRASH ELEV. STAIR ELEV. STAIR RETAILROOF BELOW RESIROOF BELOW AMENITY DECKBELOW RR PAN- TRY 44' -4" OVERHANG ABOVE OVERHANG ABOVE OVERHANG ABOVE OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE Level7 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:30PM16/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 1 LEVEL 7 0' 40'10' 20' RETAILROOF BELOW RESIROOF BELOW RESIROOF BELOW ELEV. OVERRUN ELEV. OVERRUN ROOF ACCESS ROOF ACCESS TRASH VENTS VENTING ASREQ. PERRETAIL TENANT SPACERESERVED FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.FINAL FOOTPRINTAND LAYOUTMAY VARY. SCREENINGTO BE COMPLIANTWITHAPPLICABLE CITY REQUIREMENTS. AMENITY DECKBELOW OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETTITLE RoofPlan SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN 6/22/20236:49:31PM17/22 ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1" = 20'-0" 1 ROOF 0' 40'10' 20' LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" 1 12'-0"11'-8"10'-8"10'-8"13'-6" 10'-8"13'-6"10'-0"ELEVATOR OVERRUN ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 1 22 3 4 4 556 6 77 8 AMENITYDECKBEYOND 9 188' - 8" POTENTIAL RETAIL SIGNAGELOCATION 77'-11" BUILDING HTTOT.O. HIGHESTPARAPETFROM AVERAGE GRADE PLANE 921.50' (DATUM) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" 928.83 SEENORTH COURTYARD ANDSOUTHWEST ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDINGFOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION 1234 6 7 8 1 64 5 7 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TOBE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALLMATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" CLADDING CLADDING COLOR #2 : DARKWHITEORCREAMCOLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR METAL PANEL COLOR #2: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1: DARKBRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 MASONRY WALLCLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAMCOLOR 2 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL COLOR #1 : WHITEORCREAMCOLOR 3 ARCHITECURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL 6 STOREFRONTWINDOW SYSTEM 8 METAL BALCONYANDRAILING 4 7 5 9 OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:6/22/20236:45:44PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations 18/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 West Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Courtyard Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGEPACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGELOCATIONSON THE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWNASPOTENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATIONSONLY. ALL LOCATIONS,DESIGN, SIZING, ANDSPACINGTO BEREVIEWEDUNDER SEPARATEPERMITPROCESS ATA LATERDATE. LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 6 4 61 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" 113' - 6" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATION SEECOURTYARD ELEVATIONS ANGLED IN VIEW LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" SEE WESTELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 1 234 5 7 8 6 1 4 4 4 178 2387 1 4 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TOBE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALLMATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATION CLADDING CLADDING COLOR #2: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 MASONRY WALLCLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAMCOLOR 2 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL COLOR #1 : WHITEORCREAMCOLOR 3 ARCHITECURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL 6 STOREFRONTWINDOW SYSTEM 8 METAL BALCONYANDRAILING COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #2 : DARKWHITEORCREAMCOLOR 4 METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR 7 5 METAL PANEL 9 SPANDREL PANEL OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:6/22/20236:45:47PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations 19/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 Southwest Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 South Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGEPACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGELOCATIONSON THE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWNASPOTENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATIONSONLY. ALL LOCATIONS,DESIGN, SIZING, ANDSPACINGTO BEREVIEWEDUNDER SEPARATEPERMITPROCESS ATA LATERDATE. LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" SEE SOUTH ELEVATION ANGLED IN VIEW 1 234 7 8 1 4 4 1 14 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" LEVEL 2 113' - 6" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" 1234 78 614 4 1 7 5669 MECHANICAL LOUVERS TOBE COLOR MATCHED TO ADJACENT WALLMATERIAL (TYP) JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" ANGLED ELEVATIONSBEYOND POTENTIAL RESIDENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATION POTENTIAL RETAIL SIGNAGELOCATION CLADDING CLADDING COLOR #2: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR COLOR #1: DARKBRONZE KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 MASONRY WALLCLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAMCOLOR 2 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL COLOR #1 : WHITEORCREAMCOLOR 3 ARCHITECURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL 6 STOREFRONTWINDOW SYSTEM 8 METAL BALCONYANDRAILING COLOR #2 : DARKWHITEORCREAMCOLOR 4 METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR 7 5 METAL PANEL 9 SPANDREL PANEL OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:6/22/20236:45:51PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations 20/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 East Elevation 1/16" = 1'-0" 2 North Elevation 1 2 SIGNAGEPACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGELOCATIONSON THE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWNASPOTENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATIONSONLY. ALL LOCATIONS,DESIGN, SIZING, ANDSPACINGTO BEREVIEWEDUNDER SEPARATEPERMITPROCESS ATA LATERDATE. LEVEL 2 113' - 6" LEVEL 3 127' - 0" 100' - 0" LEVEL 4 137' - 8" LEVEL 5 148' - 4" LEVEL 6 159' - 0" LEVEL 7 170' - 8" ROOF 182' - 8" LEVEL P1 90' - 0" SECTION CUT THROUGH BUILDINGFOR INTERIOR COURTYARD ELEVATION 1 347 28 145 JERRYS OFFICE BUILDING ROOF 189' - 10" AVE. GRADE PLANE 107' - 4" LEVEL 1 CLADDING CLADDING RESIDENTIAL UNIT WINDOWS/DOORS KEYNOTE LEGEND 1 MASONRY WALLCLADDING COLOR #1 : BUFF OR CREAMCOLOR 2 ARCHITECTURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL COLOR #1 : WHITEORCREAMCOLOR 3 ARCHITECURAL FIBERCEMENTWALL 7 COLOR #2 : DARKWHITEORCREAMCOLOR 4 METAL PANEL COLOR #1 : CHAMPAGNE COLOR 5 METAL PANEL COLOR #2: DARKBRONZECOLOR 6 STOREFRONTWINDOW SYSTEM COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR OpusDesignBuild,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 OpusAEGroup,L.L.C. 10350BrenRoadWest Minnetonka,MN55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEETNUMBER PLOTDATE:6/22/20236:45:54PMSHEETTITLE ExteriorElevations 21/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECTADDRESS 5100EDENAVE,EDINAMN PROJECTNUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECTMANAGER SS DRAWNBY TG CHECKED BY JF ISSUERECORD 6/23/23 SitePlanReview 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 South Courtyard Elevation 1 COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR 8 METAL BALCONYAND RAILING COLOR #1: DARKBRONZECOLOR 9 SPANDREL PANEL COLOR #1: DARKBRONZE SIGNAGEPACKAGE: ALL SIGNAGELOCATIONSON THE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWNASPOTENTIAL SIGNAGELOCATIONSONLY. ALL LOCATIONS,DESIGN, SIZING, ANDSPACINGTO BEREVIEWEDUNDER SEPARATEPERMITPROCESS ATA LATERDATE. Opus Design Build,L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 Opus AEGroup, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 SHEET NUMBER PLOT DATE: DRAWN BY CHECKED BY 6/22/2023 5:50:29 PM SHEET TITLE Photometric Plan 22/22 PROJECT Eden100 Multi-Family PROJECT ADDRESS 5100 EDEN AVE, EDINA MN PROJECT NUMBER 32171000 DATE 06/22/2023 PROJECT MANAGER ISSUE RECORD 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.2 4.1 2.3 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.5 3.7 1.4 1.2 2.5 4.1 3.4 2.2 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.5 10.7 6.5 3.0 1.4 1.5 3.8 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.4 2.4 1.7 1.1 1.5 4.6 4.6 5.3 5.4 4.6 3.1 1.9 1.0 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.4 2.6 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.6 3.9 4.5 5.0 6.1 7.8 8.4 6.9 4.1 2.1 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.6 2.4 6.6 1.4 1.2 2.1 3.1 2.9 2.7 3.5 5.0 6.7 8.2 8.7 6.8 3.9 2.0 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.7 3.2 3.3 2.6 2.4 2.8 1.5 1.5 3.7 8.3 4.3 1.7 0.7 1.0 1.9 3.2 4.8 5.8 5.8 4.0 3.2 3.0 10.4 4.3 1.2 1.4 4.9 1.8 0.7 0.4 1.3 2.4 4.1 6.7 8.6 8.3 5.3 4.1 3.0 2.0 0.9 1.1 2.3 3.6 2.7 1.2 0.6 3.0 4.9 7.1 8.9 8.4 5.9 4.5 3.0 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.3 0.9 0.6 3.5 5.0 6.2 6.5 3.7 2.4 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.3 1.1 4.3 3.7 4.2 3.8 3.7 3.3 3.3 2.7 2.4 1.9 1.2 1.6 1.2 1.7 1.3 1.9 3.9 2.8 2.7 3.1 4.2 1.2 1.6 4.0 4.0 5.0 3.5 4.5 4.0 4.7 6.3 5.3 0.1 5.4 5.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.6 2.0 1.9 5.1 6.0 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.2 12.0 14.9 0.1 6.2 6.9 7.4 7.7 7.8 6.7 4.5 8.5 8.9 9.5 9.5 9.4 7.4 4.0 5.1 19.3 26.0 25.1 25.1 25.3 26.0 17.7 4.8 13.0 16.7 17.4 19.5 18.0 18.1 14.0 5.5 13.5 17.7 17.5 18.4 19.0 20.2 15.3 6.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 2.9 4.4 4.3 2.7 2.4 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.4 2.8 3.3 4.1 5.3 6.0 0.3 0.4 3.9 6.2 7.0 5.1 3.6 1.2 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.6 3.6 5.0 5.9 0.7 0.8 2.9 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.5 2.3 3.4 4.9 5.9 1.5 1.7 1.1 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.3 2.1 3.3 4.9 5.9 3.3 3.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 2.0 3.2 4.8 5.9 6.0 6.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.8 2.9 4.4 5.6 8.2 7.9 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.5 2.4 3.7 4.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.7 2.6 3.1 8.3 7.8 8.1 7.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.1 1.5 1.6 8.7 8.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 8.5 6.7 8.4 6.9 5.5 6.2 7.7 5.6 6.2 7.5 7.2 4.7 2.5 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 6.9 4.7 2.5 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 3.3 6.4 4.2 3.3 4.0 6.0 3.4 1.6 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 5.8 7.2 6.4 4.4 3.6 4.2 6.2 7.2 6.0 3.5 1.8 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 3.8 4.4 4.2 3.5 3.1 3.4 4.2 4.4 3.9 2.7 1.6 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.2 20.1 27.1 25.8 25.7 26.2 27.2 18.6 5.2 4.7 15.0 XP1.5 19.9 21.9 20.2 20.1 XP1 5.319 2.1 1.9 3.1 3.5 2.4 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.4 2.1 3.6 13.0 XP1.6 17.1 18.6 16.9 16.4 XP1 3.816 XW13XW131.6 3.7 10.2 14.0 14.4 15.0 16.4 17.3 13.0 7.0 XW13 XW13 XW13 5.9 XW13 XW13 XW13 XW41.73 6.8XW26 XW13 XW26 XW26 XW26 XW26 7.4 XW26 6.1 7.4XW26 5.8 6.6 XW7.126 5.1 2.9 1.6 0.8 6.6 6.4 10.1 9.1 XB 3.8 3.5 1.1 3.2 5.1 XB4.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 1.0 2.3 5.5 5 X.8B 4.0 2.5 1.8 1.4 1.5 1.9 3.8 9.7 13.2 13.5 13.7 13.9 13.7 9.4 3.8 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 9.5 XB 3.7 XCYL 1.9 XCYL XCYLXCYL 1.3 XC2Y.0L 4.4XCYL14.5 18.8 19.0 21.0 18.8 18.6 13.4 3.7 XCYL XCYL 1.5 2.0 4.2 13.7 17.8 17.0 17.2 17.2 17.8 12.6 3.8 1.8 1.7 XCYL 2.1 1.8 XCYL XCYLXCYL 3.0XCYL4.0 5.0 5.9 6.5 6.3 5.60.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.0 1.8 3.0 4.9 6.6 7.0 5.5 2.8 XC2Y.2L Plan View Scale - 1" = 16ft Schedule Symbol Label Image QTY Manufacturer Catalog Description Number Lamps Lamp Output LLF Input Power Polar Plot XP1 4 RAB LIGHTING INC.ALEDS3TN 80W @ 4000K 1 10458 1 81.2 XB 4 RAB LIGHTING INC.BLEDR18 1 2153 1 17.2293 XW2 6 8 RAB LIGHTING INC. [WP, A]LED26 1 3851 1 28.6505 XCYL 14 Nuvo 62/1148 1 724 1 10.2948 XW1 3 10 RAB LIGHTING INC. [WP, A]LED13 1 1711 1 14.8 Statistics Description Symbol Avg EXTERIOR 2.9 fc 0.0 fc Min Max/Min Avg/Min Max N/A N/A 27.2 fc Date: July 26, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:2024 Work P lan Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No Action R equested I N TR O D U C TI O N: C ontinue discussion on the 2024 P lanning C ommission Work P lan AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft 2024 Planning Commis s ion Work Plan Page 1 of 3 Planning Commission 2024 Proposed Work Plan 1 Initiative Type: Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): All Commissioners Initiative Title: Land Use Applications Initiative Description: Review land use applications, send recommendations to Council on CUP, site plans, and rezoning. Deliverable: Recommendations on land use applications submitted to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): None required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning Staff & Communications. Liaison Comments: This is the primary responsibility of the Planning Commission City Manager Comments: 2 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Consider the next “Areas of Potential Change” for future small area planning/lead in to the next Comprehensive Plan Update. Initiative Description: Consideration of areas for future small area planning/lead in to the next Comprehensive Plan Update. Deliverable: Recommendation to the City Council. These areas would then be studied further in the next Comprehensive Plan update. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. This task should not take a lot of time to complete but will be important to set the stage for the next areas to study as part of the 2028 Comprehensive Plan. Liaison Comments: This task is to simply identify the areas, not study them. City Manager Comments: = commission = staff Page 2 of 3 3 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Cahill District Plan follow up. Initiative Description: Review and update industrial zoning district standards to align with Comprehensive Plan and Cahill District Area Plan guidance. Deliverable: Potential Zoning Ordinance Amendments Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Yes. Planning Staff will assist. Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: 4 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Parking Initiative Description: Consideration of future of parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. Planning Commission will be the lead. ETC & EEC will review and comment on final report and recommendation from Planning Commission. Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Page 3 of 3 5 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Underutilized paved areas (climate action plan recommendation) Initiative Description: Identify underutilized paved areas and incentivize conversion to sustainable green space or infill development. Conversion focus should take into consideration neighborhood's greenspace, heat island mitigation, affordable housing, and bike/walk mobility needs and prioritize site utilization based on addressing the greatest needs at each site as determined through appropriate engagement with the community, particularly people traditionally under represented. (This is one from the Climate Action Plan) Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 6 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Zoning Ordinance Amendments – 1) Updating the industrial zoning district standards to be more flexible with respect to retail uses; 2) Revise Building material, first floor height and transparency requirements for new buildings; 3) Create new zoning districts to align with the comprehensive land use plan? Initiative Description: Deliverable: Recommendation to City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☒ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): No budget required. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Planning staff. Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Parking Lot