Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-09-21 Meeting PacketAgenda Transportation Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room Thursday, September 21, 2023 6:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call A.Welcome Commissioners Donnelly and Karoussos III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. V.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Draft Minutes: August 17, 2023 VI.Reports/Recommendations A.Tra(c Safety Report of August 29, 2023 B.France Avenue Corridor Review C.2023 Work Plan Updates D.2024 Work Plan Proposal VII.Chair And Member Comments VIII.Sta4 Comments A.Proposed 2024 Regular Meeting Dates IX.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli8cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: II.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Welcome Commissioners Donnelly and Karoussos Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Sam Donnelly and Evangelia Karoussos have been appointed to serve on the Commission for a one-year term ending September 1, 2024. Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Draft Minutes: August 17, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the minutes of August 17, 2023 regular meeting. INTRODUCTION: See attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Minutes: Aug 17, 2023 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission City Hall Community Room August 17, 2023 I. Call To Order Chair Lewis called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call: Commissioners Bildsten, Johnson, Lewis, McCarthy, Olson, Plumb-Smith, Rubenstein, Wright Late: Commissioner Sweeney Absent: Commissioners Brown, Kanti Mahanty Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni A. Welcome Commissioner Olson The Commission welcomed Commissioner Olson, who was appointed to a partial term ending March 1, 2025. Commissioner Sweeney arrived at 6:01. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Community Comment None. V. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Commissioner Bildsten and seconded by Rubenstein to approve the June 15 and July 20, 2023 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. VI. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Commuter Services Kate Meredith and Michelle Leanord from the I-494 Corridor Commission’s Commuter Services presented about the services and resources they provided related to alternative transportation options. B. Special Recognition – Commissioner Kanti Mahanty and Sweeney The City and the Commission thanked Commissioners Kanti Mahanty and Sweeney for their service. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Traffic Safety Report of July 25, 2023 The Commission reviewed and commented on the Traffic Safety Report of July 25, 2023. • Item B1: Driver and pedestrian safety concerns on W 58th St east of France Ave Motion was made by Commissioner Plumb-Smith and seconded by Commissioner Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Rubenstein to recommend that City Council direct staff to replace the plantings at these locations with native, low maintenance prairie grasses (such as prairie dropseed) no more than 16” tall. All voted aye. Motion carried. • Item B2: Request to update lane markings on W 70th St Motion was made by Commissioner Rubenstein and seconded by Commissioner McCarthy to recommend that City Council direct staff to extend the westbound bike lane on W 70th St through the intersection and connect it to Antrim Rd, thereby removing the westbound right-turn lane. All voted aye. Motion carried. A. 2023 Work Plan Updates • #1 Pedestrian Crossing Policy Review – No update. • #2 Bicycle Network Planning for Bikes as Transportation – Subcommittee is reviewing anticipated capital projects. • #3 France Avenue Corridor Review – Subcommittee reviewed Southdale Design Guidelines, planning to present preliminary findings at September meeting. • #4 Boulevard Tree Planting – Subcommittee connected with City Forester again, reviewed Southdale Design Guidelines, • #5 Cahill Small Area Plan – Completed. • #6 Parking – Met with Planning subcommittee, work will continue into 2024. Next meeting is scheduled for September 6. • #7 Response to Community Comments – Subcommittee will bring draft language to next meeting. B. 2024 Work Plan Development The Commission continued discussion on their 2024 work plan proposal. VIII. Chair and Member Comments – Received. IX. Staff Comments – Received. X. Adjournment Motion was made by Commissioner McCarthy and seconded by Commissioner Bildsten to adjourn the August 17, 2023 regular meeting at 9:28 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 SEAT NAME 1 Wright, Grant 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% 2 Rubenstein, Tricia 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% 3 Bildsten, Roger 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% 4 Lewis, Andy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% 5 Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 6 Brown, Chris 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% 7 Olson, Bethany 1 1 50% 8 McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 9 Plumb-Smith, Jill 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% 10 Kanti Mahanty, Stephen (s) 1 1 1 1 4 50% 11 Sweeney, Isaiah (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Traffic Safety Report of August 29, 2023 Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and comment on the Traffic Safety Report of August 29, 2023. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report and supporting material. Comments received by the Commission will be included in the staff report provided to City Council at their October 3 regular meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Traffic Safety Report of August 29, 2023 September 21, 2023 Transportation Commission Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of August 29, 2023 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 29. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Engineer, Streets Public Service Worker, Transportation Planner, Police Sergeant, Public Works Director, Transportation Planner and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this meeting. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council prior to the October 3 regular meeting. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Review parking restrictions adjacent to Countryside Elementary School Staff recommends removing pick-up/drop-off only parking restriction on Tracy Ave adjacent to Countryside Elementary. Description School is requesting “Staff Parking Only” signs on Tracy Avenue. AADT 4,500 (2020) Crashes None along Tracy, south of Benton Ave. Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Unique Circumstances School wants to discourage parent pick-up and drop-off in this area, for which it is currently signed. Discussion Would this be enforced by PD? Who replaces a sign if damaged – who owns the signs? Countryside Elementary School STAFF REPORT Page 2 A2. Review directional signage at City Hall Staff recommends adding directional signage for westbound vehicles on W 50th Street to access City Hall by turning left onto Eden Avenue. A3. Wooddale Path safety concerns Staff recommends installing bollards at both ends of the path. Description W 50th Street between Grange Road and Eden Avenue is proposed to be reconstructed in 2024 to address traffic concerns of the Sunny Slope neighborhood. AADT 22,200 (2021) 85% Speed N/A Crashes Seven crashes reported in past ten years; five were rear-end collisions of eastbound vehicles waiting to turn left on Dale Drive. Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Unique Circumstances The original design includes a westbound left turn lane entering City Hall. Staff recommends removing this turn lane due to few vehicles making this movement. Eastbound vehicles can access City Hall via Eden Avenue, where there is a dedicated left turn lane. Description Residents have witnessed vehicles and motorcycles driving on shared-use path. ADT N/A 85% Speed N/A Crashes None reported in past 10 years. Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Previous Request Unsafe movement of bicycles traveling at high speeds on path. Safety Committee recommended installing center lane striping on path, ultimately no lines were installed. Unique Circumstances Pedestrian bridge over Highway 62 is anticipated to be rebuilt by 2027. Design of W 50th St with a proposed westbound left turn lane Wooddale Shared Use Path facing south. STAFF REPORT Page 3 A4. Complaints of semi-trucks parking on Parklawn Avenue Staff recommends adding parking restrictions on the south side of Parklawn Ave between Edinborough Way and York Avenue. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Sight line concerns at 5034 Green Farms Road Staff recommends no action based on context and accident history. Description Complaint included picture of semis parking on Parklawn, claiming that they don’t move for several days at a time. Request includes signing 4-hour parking or No Parking between 9 PM and 6 AM. AADT 7,850 (2022) 85% Speed N/A Crashes One in 2020 Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Previous Request Previous complaints about semis parking here. EPD was requested to enforce 6-hour restrictions without added signage. Unique Circumstances On-street parking is allowed on south side of Parklawn between York Avenue and Edinborough Way. Description Resident is concerned with visibility of driveway coming from Interlachen Boulevard. ADT N/A 85% Speed N/A Crashes None reported in past 10 years. Sight Lines Adequate Previous Review No Unique Circumstances Neighbor to the north has vegetation planted up to the roadway. Vegetation is less obstructive than in 2014 following construction of the house to the north. Discussion The intersection of Green Farms Road and Interlachen Boulevard is all-way stop controlled. Green Farms Road Photo showing two semis parked on Parklawn Ave STAFF REPORT Page 4 B2. Request for “Cross Traffic Does Not Stop” plaques along Bridge Street Staff recommends no action based on crash history, available sight lines and traffic volume on Bridge Street. B3. Request for crosswalk and stop sign at southern driveway of Cornelia Elementary School Staff recommends no action and recommends that the requester contact Edina Public Schools about potential improvements. Description Resident claims vehicles in the neighborhood don’t realize east- and westbound traffic on Bridge St is uncontrolled, leading to close-calls. ADT 530 (2013) Bridge Street between Drexel and Casco Avenues 85% Speed N/A Crashes Two reported crashes on Bridge St in last 10 years. Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Previous Request Perceived speed complaints within Country Club neighborhood. Unique Circumstances Resident noted that the intersection of Bruce Avenue and Country Club Road has these plaques. Discussion Per MnMUTCD, these plaques may be used “when engineering judgement indicates that conditions are present that are causing or could cause drivers to misinterpret the intersection as an all-way stop.” Description Resident requested a stop sign for vehicles exiting the parking lot and a crosswalk over the driveway, connecting the sidewalk on the west side of Cornelia Drive. Resident has observed near-misses in this area. ADT 1,440 (2012) 85% Speed 29.7 mph (2012) Crashes None reported in the last 10 years Ped and Bike Crosses N/A Sight Lines Adequate Previous Request N/A Unique Circumstances The sidewalk is on school property. This sidewalk is plowed by Public Works. Discussion City practice has been not to install marked crosswalks over private driveways. The City also does not have the authority to install a marked crosswalk or sign on school property. Bridge Street Red – All-way Stop Green – East and West Uncontrolled Cornelia Elementary School southern driveway STAFF REPORT Page 5 Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study C1. Long Brake Trail Decorative Stop Signs Staff is researching whether the wood-framed signs comply with MUTCD standards. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A stop sign on W 42nd Street at Alden Ave was blocked by a road work sign during the neighborhood street reconstruction project. The contractor relocated the sign. D2. A stop sign was reported to be obstructed for eastbound traffic on Edinborough Way approaching York Avenue. Some branches were trimmed to improve visibility. D3. A complaint was made of inadequate sight lines due to a tree when facing west on W 55th Street at France Avenue and looking right. Staff determined that sight lines are adequate and the driver was informed France has a striped shoulder that allows for vehicle creep into the intersection. D4. A complaint was made regarding detoured traffic during an overlay project on Valley View Road. Signage adjacent to the project was adequate and the requestor was notified to contact the EPD if they notice illegal driving actions. D5. A resident requested new signal timing at the intersection of Tracy Avenue at Vernon Avenue to improve flow of traffic during school hours. Hennepin County reviewed and updated the timing of the signal. D6. A tree branch was reported to be obstructing a stop sign for eastbound vehicles on Ayrshire Boulevard at Glengarry Parkway. Staff contacted the adjacent homeowner to trim the tree to improve sign visibility. Description Dewey Hill neighborhood has six wood-framed stop signs and neighborhood association hired a carpenter to replace the framing. Crashes None along Long Brake Trail in last 10 years Sight Lines Adequate Previous Request A similar request made for a decorative signpost at Nob Hill Road was denied in 2021. Unique Circumstances Since the neighborhood was established in the 1980s, the signs have been replaced by the association. Policy TSC previously recommended reactively replacing decorative posts with standard round poles which is easier to maintain and complies with the MnMUTCD. Wood-framed stop signs at Long Brake Trail and Delaney Bl d Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:France Avenue Corridor Review Action, Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and comment on draft report. INTRODUCTION: Subcommittee will review their draft report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Report: France Avenue Corridor Review Presentation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Transportation Commission • Date: September 21, 2023 To: Mayor and City Council cc: Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner From: Transportation Commission Subject: France Avenue Corridor Initiative Review the safety, accessibility, and amenities along the existing France Avenue Transit Corridor for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders between Minnesota Drive and Highway 62 (Southdale District). Investigation will include site visits and review of similar case studies that promote non- automobile transportation modes along similar scale roadways and will include input from key stakeholders. Inquiry is in response to the Climate Action Plan and new parking ordinances. Background France Avenue, Hennepin County Road 17, stretches the length of Edina North to South. For the purpose of this report, only the section of France Avenue from South of Highway 62 to Minnesota Drive in the was examined. This portion of France Avenue runs through what is designated as the Southdale District. This area of Edina is the most developed area of the City including M Health Fairview Hospital, the Southdale Mall (opened in 1956 first fully enclosed climate-controlled mall in America), the Galleria Edina, Westin Hotel, Centennial Lakes Park & Centennial Lakes Office Park, and numerous other office, medial retail and housing development. In the last decade the City of Edina has invested significant resources in studies and reports that examine and acknowledge the City’s interest and commitment to improving non-vehicular transportation. These include: Living Streets Plan 2015 Pedestrian and Bike Master Plan, May 2018 Edina Comprehensive Plan 2018 Greater Southdale District Plan 2018 Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines, March 2019 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Climate Action Plan, December 2021 Within each of these documents the City of Edina reconfirms its value for non-vehicular modes of transport for its residents. In looking at the France Avenue Corridor, considering these stated priorities, and guidelines, the existing conditions of France Avenue, recent and upcoming development in the Southdale District and this Commission has observed challenges and opportunities for the City to consider. As previously stated, the Southdale District is the most densely developed are of the city. The district also has increased residential density significantly in the last decade. The tablei below of recent housing developments in the Southdale District illustrates the significant increase in housing units in the Southdale District in the last decade; 2702 new units have come onto the market. This considerable sum is only increasing with the recent approvals of LifeTime Living and 70th and France which will add another 567 units to the area. Year Delivered Year Approved Development # Units # Affordable 2012 2012 Aurora on France 182 10 2012 2012 One Southdale 232 0 2013 2013 71 France 241 0 2013 2013 Yorkshire Senior Living 96 10 2014 2014 66 West 39 39 2015 2015 The Onyx 244 0 2019 2015 Aria 184 8 2021 2015 Millennium 227 11 2021 2019 The Bowers 185 0 2022 2020 The Sound on 76th 70 70 2023 2021 4040 Flats 118 118 2023 2021 Fred 1 408 0 2023 2021 Pentagon Apartments (The Eddi) 200 20 2022 The Finch (Solhem) 276 28 According to the 2020 Us Census, the Southdale District is home to more than 5000 residents per square mile.ii As the population increase though planned development Edina has an opportunity to improve the options for non-vehicular transportation. Page 3 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Observations France Avenue lacks bike lanes so pedestrians, cyclists and transit riders all must rely on the existing sidewalks for right out way along France Avenue. The City of Edina Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan indicates a proposed bike lane along France Avenue. Unfortunately, this bike lane is only actionable by Hennepin County. Hennepin County has begun its reconstruction of France Avenue from American Boulevard in Bloomington to W 76th Street in Edina. The construction plans do not include a bike lane on France Avenue. An 8’ sidewalk will be installed between Minnesota Drive and W 76th Street. iii The existing sidewalks along France Avenue are insufficient in scale, quality and safety to be considered an appropriate non-vehicular transit corridor in the Southdale District. Currently the sidewalk along the East side of France Avenue is considered a multiuse path. This 8’ wide sidewalk has no signage identifying the path as multiuse. This path in some instance has significant physical barriers and no landscape buffer as recommended in the GSDDEG. Along the West side of France Avenue, the sidewalks are inconsistent, some crossings are dangerous and in some instances are not ADA compliant. Hennepin County has a proposed ADA Sidewalk Transition Plan which includes 104 sidewalk crossings that are not compliant and require improvement.iv Metro Transit Bus riders have limited options in Edina. Currently seven bus routes operate in the Southdale District and run through the Southdale Transit Station. Service to and from the district will improve in efficiency and frequency when the new Metro Transit E Line replaces the Number 6 bus. This route will terminate /originate at the Southdale Transit Station much improving commute times to downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota beginning in 2025.v The Southdale Transit Station will be relocated to W 66th Street as part of the LifeTime Living project.vi The experience of transit riders on the E Line will be much improved, but the remaining routes along France Avenue south of the new Transit Station lack amenities for riders as was noted in the Greater Southdale District Plan.vii Some stops have only a bus sign, about half have a single bench. These stops lack shelters, direct lighting, emergency communications, warning strips and near level boarding for individuals with mobility challenges. The austere stop conditions are an equity issue for the residents of the district. The E Line service and amenities in the north of the Southdale District adjacent to planned luxury housing are very exciting, but there are no proposed improvements in the South close to older and lower income housing developments. The City of Edina Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan proposes paths and connections that would make substantive improvements in the connectivity within the district, between the district and greater Edina and the district and Bloomington and Richfield. Unfortunately, much of that plan relies on future redevelopment of parcels along France Avenue. The City of Edina has invested substantial resources in promenades on the East and West of France Avenue, but they are recreational in nature. Page 4 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 The Edina Promenade, north of Centennial Lakes Park is .75 miles long running between 70th Street and Gallagher Drive. Bicycle use terminates there, and cyclists are expected continue riding on the Mile Creek Path (East/West) or find their own way through the district.viii The West Promenade, currently under construction, is an isolated segment. There are proposed plans to extend it through the new development at 7200 France, but there are gaps in between. Without a more actionable plan on the part of the City the West Promenade will remain recreational. If the City wants residents to use non-vehicular transportation along France Avenue, then a more substantive and actionable plan should be considered. If the City of Edina would like to see their vision of more residents choosing non-vehicular transportation come to fruition, then there needs to be a better understanding of bicycles as transportation versus recreation. While Edina’s off-street bike paths are very pleasant, they are not continuous or efficient. If the decision-making process of whether to cycle involves piecing together disjointed paths and busy streets that do not have dedicated bike lanes, it is less likely an individual will choose to cycle.ix Page 5 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Opportunity Statement Create a more pedestrian and cyclist friendly environment along France Avenue south of Highway 62 that that promotes non-vehicular transportation and supports equity. Areas for Improvement Current Opportunity Set Backs Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines specifies 50' set backs along France Avenue in Typology 2b and Typology 5. Require all new development and redevelopment to adhere to the 50' set back. Landscape Buffers Landscape buffers vary greatly or are non-existent along France Avenue particularly along the West side. The GSDDEG recommends a double row of street trees along France Avenue moving pedestrian paths inward creating a safer and more pleasant experience. Require all new development and redevelopment to adhere to the double row of trees thereby creating a safer, more pleasant and more cohesive District identity. Amenities for Transit Riders Currently France Avenue lacks amenities for transit riders. Stops are merely marked with the Transit sign. Not all stops have benches, stops lack shelters, direct lighting, emergency communications, warning strips and near level boarding for individuals with mobility challenges. Consider improving the quality of transit stops. The Living Streets Plan, and the Climate Action Plan both state that improving and encouraging the use of public transport is an important piece of achieving the City's Climate goals. Work more actively with Hennepin County to expand and improve Metro Transit in Edina. Page 6 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Roadway Crossings for Pedestrians and Cyclists Along France Avenue on both east/west crossings and north/south crossings are of uneven quality and safety. The Living Streets Plan lists safe street crossing as an issue of equity for all residents. Examine safety and equity at crossings. Require improvements to existing infrastructure to comply with ordinances and ADA laws. Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation Along the West Side of France Avenue Partial development of the West Promenade that supports recreational use of bicycles. This path is dependent on future development and does not prioritize connecting to the multifamily housing south of W 72nd Street. Study the development of a multiuse path along the west side of France Avenue to promote transportation from multi-family housing in the south of W 72nd Street to connect with parks, schools,the greater Southdale area and with any proposed pedestrian/cyclist bridge over France Avenue. i Table provided by City of Edina Affordable Housing Office 8/31/23 ii https://mtgis- portal.geo.census.gov/arcgis/apps/MapSeries/index.html?appid=2566121a73de463995ed2b2fd7ff6eb7 iii https://www.hennepin.us/residents/transportation/france-494. iv https://www.hennepin.us/-/media/hennepinus/residents/transportation/documents/ada-sidewalk-transition- plan.pdf pg 21 v https://www.metrotransit.org/e-line-project vi https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/12437/Life-Time-Living-Edina-Sketch-Plan-2022 vii https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5330/09-05-2018-Draft---Greater-Southdale-Area-District-Plan- PDF?bidId= p 84 viii https://www.edinamn.gov/696/Edina-Promenade ix https://pointa.ca/2020/07/29/biking-for-recreation-vs-transportation-the-suburban-cycling-experience/ The CITY ofEDINA France Avenue Corridor September 21, 2023 The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Initiative Review the safety, accessibility, and amenities along the existing France Avenue Transit Corridor for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders between Minnesota Drive and Highway 62 (Southdale District). Investigation will include site visits and review of similar case studies that promote non- automobile transportation modes along similar scale roadways and will include input from key stakeholders. Inquiry is in response to the Climate Action Plan and new parking ordinances. The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Year Delivered Year Approved Development # Units # Affordable 2012 2012 Aurora on France 182 10 2012 2012 One Southdale 232 0 2013 2013 71 France 241 0 2013 2013 Yorkshire Senior Living 96 10 2014 2014 66 West 39 39 2015 2015 The Onyx 244 0 2019 2015 Aria 184 8 2021 2015 Millennium 227 11 2021 2019 The Bowers 185 0 2022 2020 The Sound on 76th 70 70 2023 2021 4040 Flats 118 118 2023 2021 Fred 1 408 0 2023 2021 Pentagon Apartments (The Eddi)200 20 2022 The Finch (Solhem)276 28 The table below of recent housing developments in the Southdale District illustrates the significant increase in housing units in the Southdale District in the last decade; 2702 new units have come onto the market. This considerable sum is only increasing with the recent approvals of LifeTime Living and 70th & France which will add another 567 units to the area. Table provided by City of Edina Affordable Housing Office 8/31/23 Background The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Opportunity Statement Create a more pedestrian and cyclist friendly environment along France Avenue south of Highway 62 that that promotes non-vehicular transportation and supports equity. The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor The Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines (2019) recommends 50’ setbacks and landscape buffers along France Avenue Setbacks & Landscape Buffers The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Setbacks & Landscape Buffers The Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines (2019) recommends 50’ setbacks and landscape buffers along France Avenue. Redevelopment plans should respond to these guidelines. When plans are approved that do not adhere to the guidelines it lessens the strength of these recommendations. 42’ setback US Bank Building Phase I of 72 & France Development The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Setbacks & Landscape Buffers The Greater Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines (2019) recommends 50’ setbacks and landscape buffers along France Avenue. Within the Southdale District redevelopment plans should respond to these guidelines. Proposed 7235 France Ave. Sketch Plan (Macy's Furniture Store Site) The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Metro Transit’s E Line will bring more efficient service for riders. Bus stops north of the Southdale Transit Station will be upgraded to Metro Transit’s new stop design which offers amenities for riders. Amenities for Transit Riders The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor The bus stops south of the Southdale Transit Center will receive no upgrades. Amenities for Transit Riders The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Roadway Crossings Along the west side of France Avenue, the sidewalks are inconsistent, some crossings are dangerous and in some instances are not ADA compliant. Hennepin County has a proposed ADA Sidewalk Transition Plan which includes 104 sidewalk crossings that are not compliant and require improvement. The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Proposed Edina Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor The existing Edina Promenade to the East of France Avenue stretches between W 70th Street and Gallagher Drive. Cyclists have the option of continuing on the on the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail (East/West) or find their own route South as bicycles are prohibited in Centennial Lake Park. Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation The CITY ofEDINA West Promenade West Promenade (Southdale District Design Experience Guidelines) West Promenade (alternative alignment) Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail 7200-7250 France redevelopment Lynmar Basin Stormwater Project (under construction) Valley View Road reconstruction (2023) The West Promenade, currently under construction, is an isolated segment. There are proposed plans to extend it through the new development at 7200 France, but there are gaps in between. Challenges: 1. No definitive plan 2. Recreational in nature France Avenue Corridor Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor East Side Sidewalks The existing sidewalks along France Avenue are insufficient in scale, quality and safety to be considered an appropriate non-vehicular transit corridor in the Southdale District. Currently the sidewalk along the East side of France Avenue is considered a multiuse path. This 8’ wide sidewalk has no signage identifying the path as multiuse. The sidewalks sometimes have obstacles in the path. Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Bike trails for recreation vs. routes for transportation “Multi-use trails, as wonderful as they are for recreation, are not sufficient infrastructure for transportation. They do not connect people to amenities, workplaces, or schools. People, like myself, who wish to use cycling as a means of transportation, must either brave busy roads or discontinuous residential streets. So, what do you choose? A stressful journey alongside speeding cars or an inefficient route that extends your journey? Likely, you choose your car.” --PointA https://pointa.ca/2020/07/29/biking-for-recreation-vs-transportation-the-suburban-cycling-experience/ Pedestrian and Cyclist Transportation The CITY ofEDINAFrance Avenue Corridor Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2023 Work Plan Updates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Commissioners will provide updates on the status of 2023 Work P lan initiatives (unless an item is elsewhere on the current agenda). See attached work plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2023 Work Plan Progress Report Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Commission: Transportation Commission 2023 Annual Work Plan Initiative #1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Pedestrian Crossing Policy Review Review existing crossing policy and recommend changes with consideration for local amenities such as parks and schools. Deliverable Report and recommendations to City Council Leads Chris Brown Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-Committee Budget Required: None Staff Support Required: 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from other staff (Engineering, Parks & Recreation) Jan: No update. Feb: Starting to review policy, resources provided by staff and case studies from other communities. Mar: Started reviewing case studies from Seattle, Denver and Dakota County and will bring back findings and recommendations. Apr: Next step is to meet with staff. May: Meeting with staff next week to discuss next steps. Jun: Met with staff to talk about next steps, focusing on case studies and looking for areas where Edina can improve. Jul: No update. Aug: No update. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Initiative #2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Bicycle Network Planning for Bikes as Transportation Develop a priority list of high-traffic corridors and ideas for bike friendly improvements. Deliverable Report to City Council Leads Andy Lewis, Jill Plumb- Smith Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-committee Budget Required: None Staff Support Required: 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison Jan: Subcommittee will use 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan as blueprint to guide this initiative. Requested street reconstruction information and Hennepin County contacts from staff. Feb: Subcommittee will connect with Hennepin County staff on gaps in their system and timeline for improvements. Mar: Subcommittee met with Hennepin County staff, learned about County’s cost participation program. Hennepin County has also identified how inhospitable France Ave is for pedestrians and cyclists. Apr: Subcommittee will review information provided by staff, will focus efforts on what is within City’s control. May: Subcommittee is making progress on a map of recommendations based on information provided by City and County. Jun: Subcommittee is looking at current bike routes to Southdale and Cahill. Jul: No update. Aug: Subcommittee is reviewing anticipated capital projects. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Initiative #3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) France Avenue Corridor Review Review the safety, accessibility, and amenities along the existing France Avenue Transit Corridor for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders between Minnesota Drive and Highway 62 (Southdale District). Investigation will include site visits and review of similar case studies that promote non-automobile transportation modes along similar scale roadways and will include input from key stakeholders. Inquiry is in response to the Climate Action Plan and new parking ordinances. Deliverable Report to City Council Leads Tricia Rubenstein, Bruce McCarthy Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-committee Budget Required: None. Staff Support Required: 2-5 hours per month from Staff Liaison, ~10 hours from Communications for stakeholder engagement/website Jan: Requested Hennepin County contacts from staff. Feb: Subcommittee has started a base drawing, highlighting sidewalks, crosswalks, driveways, and signage. Requested Richfield contacts from staff to get more information on recent W 66th St reconstruction project. Mar: Subcommittee reviewed existing sidewalks gaps, amenities for cyclists. Hennepin County is adding sidewalk between Minnesota Dr and W 76th St. Staff provided a contact for the City of Richfield to learn about recent W 66th St project. Apr: Subcommittee reached out to Planning about redevelopment proposal at Macy’s and lack of bicycle facilities. A pedestrian underpass is also being discussed related to the redevelopment of Macy’s and 7200/7250 France. May: Subcommittee is meeting with the City of Richfield’s Public Works Director this month to learn about W 66th St reconstruction project. Jun: Subcommittee met with Richfield staff to talk about multi-modal improvement projects. Members asked if there are landscaping standards for France. Jul: No update. Aug: Subcommittee reviewed Southdale Design Guidelines, planning to present preliminary findings at September meeting. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Initiative #4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Boulevard Tree Planting Review options for replacement and new boulevard tree planting program (Greenspace + Trees Strategy GS1). Deliverable Report to City Council Leads Tricia Rubenstein Target Completion Date Q4 Sub-Committee Budget Required: None Staff Support Required: 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from City Forester Jan: Already collected information on potential opportunities. Feb: Planning to meet with City Forester in spring. Mar: City Forester has new interactive map showing where new trees are being planted. Apr: Subcommittee reached out to City Forester to schedule another meeting. May: Subcommittee met with City Forester again. City has almost reached its goal of 1,000 new trees this year and the spring tree sale was a big success. Jun: Subcommittee asked for the street recon map. Jul: No update. Aug: Subcommittee connected with City Forester again, reviewed Southdale Design Guidelines. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Initiative #5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Cahill Small Area Plan Appoint Commissioner to serve on the Cahill small area plan working group. Deliverable Commissioner will actively participate in the working group and provide regular updates to the Commission. Leads None Target Completion Date Q4 Working Group Budget Required: Funds available through Hennepin County Planning Grant Staff Support Required: 1 hour per month from Staff Liaison. Jan: Commissioner Kitui absent, no update provided. Next public workshop is Tuesday, February 21, 7-9 p.m. at Public Works. Feb: No update. Mar: No update. Apr: Add discussion item to May agenda. May: Draft plan is now available on Better Together Edina website for public comment through June 22. Planning Commission public hearing is scheduled for June 28. Commission will review and comment at their next meeting. Jun: Commission reviewed and commented on the draft plan. Jul: Initiative complete. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Initiative #6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Parking Consideration of future parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what Commissions/resources should be assigned to each. Deliverable Recommendation to City Council (Review and Comment from ETC, EEC) Leads Kirk Johnson Target Completion Date Q4 Cross-Commission Committee (PC lead, EEC) Budget Required: None Staff Support Required: 2-5 hours per month from Staff Liaison, ~5 hours from other staff (Planning, Engineering) Jan: Planning Commission lead (Alkire) will set up a meeting in early March. EEC representative is Commissioner Schima. Planning expects to develop a roadmap for Council/Commissions on parking initiatives. ETC will inquire whether bike parking can be included. Feb: No update. Mar: Waiting to hear who new lead is from Planning Commission. Apr: No update. May: Subcommittee reached out to Planning to determine where this initiative lies in their priorities. Jun: On hold until Planning reaches out. Jul: No update Aug: Met with Planning subcommittee, work will continue into 2024. Next meeting is scheduled for September 6. Initiative #7 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Enhancements to Commission Response to Community Comments Create more thorough and consistent communication to provide to community members who comment at Transportation Commission meetings or provide written commentary to the Commission or City staff. Deliverable Proposed set of communications Leads Andy Lewis Grant Wright Roger Bildsten Target Completion Date Q3 Budget Required: None Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours from Community Engagement Manager, 1-2 hours from Communications Aug: Subcommittee will bring draft language to next meeting. Approved by City Council December 6, 2022 Amended by City Council August 2, 2023 Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Transit service advocacy, pedestrian safety education, speed limit adherence Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2024 Work Plan Proposal Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the 2024 work plan proposal. INTRODUCTION: See attached supporting materials. ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft 2024 Work Plan Proposal Staff Report: 2024 Work Plan Development 2024 Work Plan Template Transportation Chapter, 2018 Comprehensive Plan ETC Work Plan History Page 1 of 4 Transportation Commission DRAFT 2024 Proposed Work Plan 1 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Q4 Lead(s): Grant Wright, Roger Bildsten Initiative Title: Traffic Safety Infrastructure Research and Recommendations Initiative Description: Residents have been vocal with the Transportation Commission about how dangerously fast drivers drive on Edina’s residential streets – even after speed limits were lowered to 25 mph. This, paired with a lack of focus on traffic enforcement capacity due to understaffing of patrol officers and a slower-than-desired implementation of traffic calming measures they suggest to the Commission, leaves some residents feeling frustrated with the City’s perceived inaction. To improve safety for all users of Edina’s transportation network, this initiative will support an educational campaign (such as “Drive 25”) and recommend improved processes to implement traffic calming improvements more quickly. Deliverable: Complete case study research of cities that leverage quick build solutions to implement traffic calming changes to roadways. Recommend improvements at priority locations (e.g., schools, parks, bus stops, places of worship, etc.) and identify grant programs for city staff consideration to pursue for project implementation of best practices. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 2 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): Grant Wright, Roger Bildsten Initiative Title: Traffic Safety Community Outreach Campaign Initiative Description: The Transportation Commission reviews requests for pedestrian crossings (marking a crosswalk or enhancing an existing crossing) nearly every month. Correlating with safety concerns surrounding traffic calming, residents share concerns and desires of being able to walk safely and conveniently to their destination. To improve safety for Edina’s most vulnerable travelers, people walking or rolling, this initiative will support an educational campaign (such as St. Paul’s “Stop for Me” campaign) and recommend priority areas to focus city resources for pedestrian improvements. Deliverable: Execute a yearlong traffic calming community outreach campaign in close partnership with the City’s Communications team (owned digital channels, yard signs, earned media) to reinforce the new 25 mph speed limit, increasing the stigma of driving over the limit and helping residents feel heard. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: = commission = staff Page 2 of 4 3 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): Jill Plumb-Smith, Kirk Johnson Initiative Title: Parking (Planning Commission Lead) Initiative Description: Consideration of the future of parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what commissions/resources should be assigned to each. The Planning Commission will be the lead. Deliverable: ETC will review and comment on the final report and recommendation from Planning Commission. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 4 Initiative Type: Event Target Completion Date: Q1 2024 Lead(s): Andy Lewis, Grant Wright Initiative Title: Edina Transportation Commission 20th Anniversary Recognition & Celebration Initiative Description: The Commission will work with staff to create a proclamation recognizing the Commission’s 20th anniversary and celebrating their contributions and achievements since 2004. Deliverable: Proclamation for adoption by City Council. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 5 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Organized Trash Hauling Initiative Description: Pass ordinance or other legal measure to organize trash hauling in Edina in a way that maintains market share of haulers already doing business in the city, while improving roadway safety and reducing unnecessary wear-and-tear. Deliverable: Organized trash hauling to ensure haulers are segmented to parts of the city, reducing roadway wear-and- tear, vehicle emissions, increasing safety for pedestrians and drivers. Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Page 3 of 4 6 Initiative Type: Target Completion Date: Q4 2024 Lead(s): Initiative Title: Transit Service Advocacy and Expansion Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 7 Initiative Type: Annual/Ongoing Target Completion Date: Q4 2024 Lead(s): Initiative Title: Boulevard Tree Planting Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Page 4 of 4 8 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): Tricia Rubenstein Initiative Title: Bike Infrastructure & Network Build Out & Advocacy (add connectivity, filling gaps) Initiative Description: incorporate language from previous initiatives about grant funding, pull in parts from this year’s initiative, one recommendation from League of American Bicyclists report card - France, 66th to 78th - 50th, France to Hwy 100 - Valley View, Hwy 62 to 66th Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 9 Initiative Type: Project Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): Roger Bildsten Initiative Title: Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan Review Initiative Description: The Commission will assess progress to-date on implementation of the plan; prioritize implementation of recommendations within the plan that have not been yet implemented; identify appropriate updates, revisions, deletions or additions to the plan; and develop a community communication strategy related to the plan. Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: June 15, 2023 Transportation Commission Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner 2024 Work Plan Development Information / Background To aid in the development of the 2024 Work Plan proposal, staff would like to provide the Commission with the following guidance and recommendations: General 1. Commission work plans are developed by the Commission, not the staff liaison. 2. Commissioners are encouraged to review the goals from the Transportation Chapter of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan when considering work plan initiatives. 3. There should be at least one commissioner willing to lead each initiative for the Commission to propose it. 4. Work plan initiatives should not include City Department work plan initiatives. While there may be overlap, the role of the Commission should be made clear. 5. List proposed initiatives in order of priority (#1 is highest priority). 6. Commissions should be careful not to overload their work plan, but pursue an achievable number of initiatives. 7. The “Parking Lot” is reserved for initiatives the Commission considered but did not propose as part of the work plan. These items are not considered approved and would require a work plan amendment approved by Council to allow the Commission to begin work. Initiative & Outcome Fields When writing initiatives, make sure the following points are addressed: 1. What is the specific action/outcome? 2. Describe what the Commission will do. 3. Describe what the outcome(s) will look like. Examples: Study and report on other agencies’ processes for completing traffic impact studies Review and recommend change to the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund policy STAFF REPORT Page 2 The 2024 Work Plan development schedule will proceed as follows: June 15 July 20 August 17 Regular ETC meetings • 2024 Work Plan development September 21 Regular ETC meeting • Deadline to approve 2024 Work Plan proposal October 3 City Council work session • Chairs will present 2024 Work Plan proposals • Council will review, ask clarifying questions and give feedback to City staff on possible amendments to initiatives • Staff Liaisons will be available for questions November 8 City Council work session • City Manager will present 2024 Work Plan proposals with liaison and Manager comments • Council will review, ask clarifying questions and give feedback on initiatives • Staff Liaisons will be available for questions December 6 Regular City Council meeting • Council will approve 2024 Work Plans January 1, 2024 • Commissions begin work on 2024 Work Plans Page 1 of 2 Commission Name 2024 Proposed Work Plan 1 Initiative Type: Project, Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 2 Initiative Type: Project, Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: = commission = staff Page 2 of 2 3 Initiative Type: Project, Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: 4 Initiative Type: Project, Ongoing/Annual, Event Target Completion Date: Quarter or month Lead(s): List at least one commissioner Initiative Title: Initiative Description: Deliverable: Council Charge: ☐ 1: Study & Report ☐ 2: Review & Comment ☐ 3: Review & Recommend ☐ 4: Review & Decide Budget Required (completed by staff): Are there funds for this project? If there are not funds available, explain the impact of Council approving this initiative. Staff Support Required (completed by staff): Who in addition to the staff liaison will have to support this initiative? How many hours of support are needed? Communications/marketing? Liaison Comments: Liaison comments should be completed prior to submitting the proposed work plan to MJ. City Manager Comments: Parking Lot 5-1 5. Transportation Chapter Highlights This chapter of the Edina Comprehensive Plan discusses the transportation network; its existing and planned future design, function, and operational characteristics. Current and future conditions are considered against three aspects of movement: 1) to and from, 2) within, and 3) through the City. As presented in this chapter, movement is broadly discussed to take into account: • The municipal transportation system comprising local streets, pedestrian ways, bicycle facilities, and City-operated transit services; • The regional transportation system of State of Minnesota and Hennepin County highways • Transit services that are provided by the Metropolitan Council/Metro Transit, Southwest Metro Transit; and the City of Edina through a contractual arrangement with DARTS. • Non-motorized transportation modes supported by the City and Three Rivers Park District. The chapter defines the existing system, identifying the locational and physical characteristics of system components and assesses them against factors such as: • capacity, • safety, • efficiency, • environmental and social impacts, and • overall contribution to: a) the ability to conveniently move around and b) the physical design of the City. Edina’s Transportation Planning Mission: The mission for transportation planning in Edina is to provide access and facilitate the movement of people and goods efficiently, safely, cost effectively, and comfortably to any desired destination while, at the same time, seeking to improve community livability and the environment and minimize associated negative impacts. Transportation planning is not an end in and of itself. Instead, transportation planning is performed to proactively identify the most suitable travel modes and pathways to help achieve a desirable and livable community and accommodate safe and convenient travel to, within, and through the community’s nodes, parks, and City facilities. Toward this end, this chapter considers the roles of a range of transportation infrastructure (roadways, transitways, walkways, bikeways, railways and flyways), to support a variety of vehicles, each operating successfully and in a manner that minimizes conflicts with each other and surrounding land uses. Edina is a near fully developed community, and the existing roadway network is essentially complete. Today’s primary transportation planning focus is not on building new roads or new alignments but on: 1. Renewing, managing, and improving the existing transportation system (network); 2. Ensuring that the transportation system can accommodate travel demand imposed by new developments; 3. Improving the City’s non-motorized transportation system to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle movement and increase active transportation; 4. Supporting and encouraging transit use; 5. Increasing safety; 6. Implementing the City’s Living Streets Plan (2015) to ensure that the transportation needs of all users will be considered and all modes will be appropriately accommodated; and 7. Ensuring that the City will manage the existing and future transportation systems in an efficient and responsible manner to achieve livability, sustainability, and a high level of environmental quality. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-2 Fourteen goals developed for this chapter, which follow, focus on developing a multi-modal transportation system that is conveniently accessible to all users. The goals recognize and seek to reverse the advantage that automobile travel has had over transit and non-motorized modes; thus enabling residents and visitors to travel without increasing greenhouse gas emissions, personal costs, and costs to society. 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses with a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single-occupant vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicular trips and the use of alternative travel options. 5. Promote a travel demand management (TDM) program through a coordinated program of regulations, marketing, and provision of alternative workplace and travel options. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high-performance transit service and connections. 7. Develop and manage parking provision to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride-sharing (car pools and van pools), and bicycle parking. 8. Invest in infrastructure to support the continued growth in low- to zero-emission technology and support regional and statewide efforts to educate and adopt electric vehicles. 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. 10. Engage, seek input from and educate all segments of the community regarding transportation- related issues and projects impacting the City. 11. Identify new and continuing sources for transportation infrastructure funding by seeking to partner where feasible with federal, state, county and adjacent community sources. 12. Design roadway facilities according to their intended service function and neighborhood context. 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadways. adjacent community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. These goals are consistent with and support the City’s Living Streets Plan (2015), a policy plan that is divided into three elements: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The policy plan includes a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. (https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1199/Living-Streets-Plan-PDF?bidId=) Excerpts from the policy plan are provided below. Living Streets Policy Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-3 Living Streets Vision Edina is a place where ...  Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible;  Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike;  Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity;  Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity;  Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments;  Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and  Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Living Streets Principles Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principles: • Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. • Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principles: • Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel. • Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights-of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit. • Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas. • Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development. • Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principles: • Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-4 • Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils. • Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts. • Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities. • Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principles: • Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public. • Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways. • Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. Living Streets Implementation The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-5 Introduction Overview Effective transportation planning is critically important for a community such as Edina. Residents, institutions, and businesses must be provided with transportation facilities and services that meet mobility needs in an efficient, effective and safe manner. Transportation facilities, at the same time, need to be planned and constructed so as to limit negative social, environmental, and aesthetic impacts to the greatest degree feasible. In addition, residents who cannot or choose not to drive need to have transportation options to meet their daily needs. There is a fundamental link between transportation planning and land use planning. Successful land use planning cannot take place without taking transportation considerations into account. Conversely, transportation planning is driven by the need to support existing and future land uses. (Chapter 3 of this Comprehensive Plan identifies existing and planned future land uses, which are base-level inputs in transportation planning.) Edina Transportation Commission In 2003, the City formed the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC). It comprises citizens appointed by the City Council. It advises the City Council on transportation issues facing the City, including traffic management, roadway improvement projects, non-motorized transportation, and traffic safety requests. This transportation chapter was prepared under the guidance of the ETC. Purpose There are three objectives of this Transportation chapter: 1. To provide a guidance document for City staff and elected officials regarding the planning and implementation of effective transportation facilities and systems over the planning horizon. 2. To give citizens and businesses background on transportation issues and allow them to be better informed regarding the City’s decision making on transportation issues. 3. To communicate to other government agencies Edina’s perspectives and intentions regarding transportation planning issues. The preparation of the document also has provided stakeholders with the opportunity to have input into the transportation planning process. Current Conditions Walking and Bicycling Walking and Bicycling Facilities The existing network of sidewalks, pathways and bicycle facilities serving the City of Edina is depicted on Figures 5.1 and 5.2. In 2018 the City prepared a Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan; the Master Plan’s pedestrian and bicycle findings and recommendations are summarized in Section 7.3. The full Master Plan is attached as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan and can be accessed at https://www.edinamn.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5433/Final-Master-Plan-Report-PDF Regional Bicycle Transportation Network The goal of the Metropolitan Council’s Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) is to establish an integrated seamless network of on-street bikeways and off-road trails to improve conditions for bicycle transportation at the regional level and encourage planning and implementation of future bikeways. The network is divided into two tiers each for RBTN corridors and alignments. Figure 5.3 depicts the Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN Corridors and Alignments. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-6 Figure 5.1: Existing Sidewalk Facilities Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-7 Figure 5.2: Existing Bicycle Facilities Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-8 Figure 5.3: Tier 1 and Tier 2 Regional Bike Network Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-9 Tier 1 RBTN Corridors have been identified by the Metropolitan Council as the highest priority for regional transportation planning and investment. Tier 2 RBTN Corridors are the remaining corridors in the overall regional network and are assigned the second tier priority. As shown, there is one small Tier 1 RBTN corridors in Edina, which looks to make a connection between two RBTN alignments across the W 77th St bridge over TH 100. Additionally, there are three Tier 2 RBTN corridors in Edina. These corridors (which do not yet have defined alignments) are centered on: • Blake Road/Interlachen Boulevard • Vernon Avenue/West 50th Street • Canadian Pacific Railroad north of West 66th Street Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN Corridors are similar to RBTN Alignments. Unlike the Corridors, the Alignments have specific route alignments defined through discussions with City and County staff. These alignments either already exist or are defined in City planning documents. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, opened in 2018 by Three Rivers Park District, is the only Tier 1 RBTN Alignment in Edina, and West 66th Street is the City’s only Tier 2 RBTN Alignment. Transit Existing Transit Routes and Paratransit Services Scheduled transit service for Edina residents is currently provided by Metro Transit (a division of the Metropolitan Council) and by Southwest Transit. Most of the City of Edina is within Metro Transit’s Market Area III, with eastern portions (including Southdale and northeast Edina) in Market Area II. Transit Market Area II has high to moderately high population and employment densities and typically has a traditional street grid that is comparable to Market Area I. Much of Market Area II is also categorized as an Urban Center and can support many of the same types of fixed-route transit services as Market Area I, although usually at lower frequencies or shorter service plans. Transit Market Area III has moderate density but tends to have a less well developed traditional street grid that can limit the effectiveness of transit. It is typically Urban with large portions of Suburban and Suburban Edge communities. Transit service in this area is primarily commuter express bus service with some fixed-route local service providing basic coverage. General public dial-a-ride services are available where fixed-route service is not viable. The existing scheduled service to Edina residents is detailed in Table 5.1 on the next page and illustrated on Figure 5.4. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-10 Table 5.1: Scheduled Transit Service In Edina (2018) Route Number Service Route/Area Service Description 6 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Uptown, downtown Minneapolis, University of Minnesota High frequency local service, all day/evening, all week; 5-15 minute headways 46 Minnetonka, Edina (includes 50th/France), south Minneapolis, St Paul Local service all day/evening, all week; 30-60 minute headways 146 Edina (Vernon Avenue), southwest Minneapolis, downtown Minneapolis Limited stop service (I-35W) service during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays 515 Edina (Includes Southdale Transit Center), Richfield, South Minneapolis, Bloomington (includes Mall of America), Veterans Medical Center Local service, all day, all week; 10-30 minute headways 537 Bloomington (includes Normandale College), Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center) Local service, all day/evening, weekdays; 60 minute headways 538 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Richfield, Bloomington (includes Mall of America) Local service, all day/evening, all week; 30-60 minute headways 540 Edina, Richfield (includes Best Buy Headquarters), Bloomington (includes Mall of America) Local service, all day/evening, all week; 15-30 minute headways during a.m./p.m. rush hours, otherwise 60-90 minute headways 578 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), downtown Minneapolis Express service (TH 62 and I-35W) during a.m. and p.m. rush hours 579 University of Minnesota, south Minneapolis, Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center) Express service (I-35W and TH 62) during p.m. rush hour, weekdays 587 Edina, downtown Minneapolis Express service (TH 100 and I-394) during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays 600 (Southwest Transit) Eden Prairie (includes Southwest Station), Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), downtown Minneapolis “Flex route” service during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays, 10-20 minute headways Note: All the routes listed in Table 5.1 are provided by Metro Transit with the exception of Route 600, which is provided by Southwest Metro Transit. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-11 Figure 5.4: Existing, Scheduled Transit Service Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-12 Metro Mobility Paratransit services are provided by Metro Transit’s Metro Mobility service. Door to door service is provided using a wheelchair lift-equipped van on a first come-first served basis. 2018 hours of operation are daily 4:15 a.m. to 2:30 a.m. CloverRide Circulator Service The City of Edina contracts with Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for Seniors (DARTS) to provide a circulator bus service in the Southdale area for Edina residents and visitors. This service, called CloverRide, operates from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. on Fridays. CloverRide is a reliable, continuous shuttle service that provides accessibility from senior housing locations in the Southdale area to retail and other popular destinations. The one-hour “loop” runs clockwise along France and York Avenues between W 65th Street and Minnesota Drive. While focused on serving senior citizens, the CloverRide circulator bus service is available to riders of any age. High-Frequency Transit Routes The only high-frequency transit route that currently serves Edina is the Route 6 (see Table 5.1 above). This route serves Edina’s industrial park area, the Southdale Transit Center, South Minneapolis (including the Uptown Transit Station), downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota. Transit Stations and Transit Centers Southdale Transit Center The key transit facility in Edina is the Southdale Transit Center, which is located in the eastern portion of Southdale Center shopping mall. It includes a covered shelter area where route and schedule information can be found. The Southdale Transit Center is one of the busiest transit centers in the Twin Cities, with seven transit lines that stop and link at this location, along with a park & ride (see below). Three lighted, covered waiting shelters are equipped with on-demand heat and real-time departure information. Park-and-Rides and Express Bus Corridors Southdale Park & Ride There are 70 surface park & ride spaces at the Southdale Transit Center (see above), with available overflow parking for additional vehicles. Express Bus Corridors TH 62, TH 100, I-35W and I-394 serve as express bus corridors for Metro Transit routes that connect Edina commuters to downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota. Express Routes 578 and 579 run along TH 62 and I-35W, while Route 587 runs along TH 100 and I-394. Transit Advantages and Transit Support Facilities Currently, Metro Transit operates on “bus-only shoulders” within Edina on northbound TH 100 (north of Benton Avenue) and both eastbound and westbound TH 62 (east of Gleason Road). There are currently no transit support facilities in Edina Roadways Located within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, the City of Edina is served by the regional roadway network that is shown on Figure 5.5. As shown, Edina is a first-tier suburb within the I-494 beltway, and the important regional roadways that pass through or are adjacent to the City are: I-494, Trunk Highway (TH) 169, TH 100, and TH 62 (Crosstown). Cities that are adjacent to Edina are: Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Bloomington, and Richfield. Figure 5.6 shows existing daily traffic volumes, and Figure 5.7 shows the number of lanes on the regional roads that comprise the regional roadway network. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-13 Figure 5.5: Regional Roadway Network Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-14 Figure 5.6: Current (2016) Daily Traffic Volumes Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-15 Figure 5.7: Number of Lanes on Collectors and Arterials Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-16 Roadway Functional Classification The roadway functional classification system describes how streets and highways in a network collect and distribute traffic from neighborhood streets to collector roadways to arterials and ultimately to the Metropolitan Highway System. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land versus provide higher-speed mobility for “through” traffic. Functional classification is a cornerstone of transportation planning. Within this approach, roads are located and designed to perform their designated function. It should be noted that while functional classification is an important factor to determine the engineering/technical design parameters for roadways, aesthetic considerations in Edina will be directed by the Living Streets Plan and transportation-related community design guidelines discussed in Chapter 3 of this Comprehensive Plan. The functional classification system used in the City of Edina, as described below and shown on Figures 5.8 and 5.9, conforms to the Metropolitan Council standards. The Metropolitan Council has published these criteria in the Transportation Development Guide/Policy Plan. This guide separates roadways into four (4) street classifications, including principal arterials, minor arterials, collectors, and local streets. The City of Edina has expanded the Metropolitan Council’s classification system to include local connectors, bringing the total to five classifications. These classifications address the function of state, county and city streets from a standpoint of the safe and efficient movement of traffic through the City while providing satisfactory access to residents and businesses located within the City. Under the following headings, information is provided for each of the respective functional classes, as well the roadways that fall under those classes in Edina. The descriptions of the characteristics of the functional classes provided below are based on Metropolitan Council information. It should be noted that an additional sub-classification called Local Connector streets is included as part of Edina’s local roadway network and is described below. It should also be noted that these descriptions represent “ideal conditions” and that not all roadways Key Features of a Functionally Classified Roadway System • Systems that include an appropriate balance of the five types of roadways provide the greatest degree of safety and efficiency. • It takes a combination of various types of roadways to meet the needs of the variety of land uses found in most urbanized areas. • Most agencies could not afford a system made up entirely of principal arterials, and a region only served by a system of local streets would likely be gridlocked. • Roadways that only serve one function are generally safer and tend to operate more efficiently. For example, freeways only serve the mobility function and, as a group, have the lowest crash rates and the highest levels of operational efficiency. • Functional classification can be used to prioritize roadway improvements. • The design features and levels of access for specific roadways can be matched to the intended function of individual roadways. • The appropriate balance point between competing functions should be determined for each roadway based on analyses of specific operational, safety, design, and land features. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-17 Figure 5.8: Regional Roadway Functional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-18 Figure 5.9: Local Roadway Functional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-19 within that functional class will fit the specific description due to unique local conditions, history of the roadway, or other factors. Principal Arterials Principal Arterials include all Interstate freeways. Interstate freeways connect the region with other areas in the state and other states. They also connect the metro centers to regional business concentrations. The emphasis of principal arterials is on moving large volumes of traffic over long distances rather than providing direct access to land. They connect only with other Interstate freeways, other principal arterials, and select minor arterials and collectors. Principal arterials are not intended to serve pedestrian and bicycle travel directly and they often act as barriers to bicycle and pedestrian travel in the centers and neighborhoods through which they pass. The principal arterials through or adjacent to Edina are: • I-494 • TH 100 • TH 169 • TH 62 (Crosstown) Minor Arterials The primary function of Minor Arterials is mobility as opposed to access in the urban area; and only concentrations of commercial or industrial land uses should have direct access to them. Minor arterials should connect to principal arterials, other minor arterials, and collectors. Connection to some local streets is acceptable. Minor arterials are designed to carry higher volumes of general traffic than other local roads carry. Sometimes the design standards for high volume minor arterials create a barrier for bicycle and pedestrian travel. The Metropolitan Council has identified “A” minor arterials as streets that are of regional importance because they relieve, expand, or complement the principal arterial system. The “A” minor arterials in the Edina area are summarized in Table 5.2, below. Table 5.2 – “A” Minor Arterial Roadways Roadway From To Type France Avenue (CSAH 17) Southern City Limit Northern City Limit Reliever Arterial Valley View Road TH 62 West 66th Street Reliever Arterial West 66th Street Valley View Road Eastern City Limit Reliever Arterial Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Interlachen Boulevard TH 100 Augmenter Arterial Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road (CSAH 158) TH 62 Interlachen Boulevard Reliever West 50th St TH 100 France Avenue South (CSAH 17)** Augmenter Arterial TH 169 E Frontage Road/West 78th Street/Edina Industrial Boulevard/West 77th Street/West 76th Street Western City Limit Eastern City Limit Reliever Arterial ** County State Aid Highway (CSAH): A county road where funding support is provided to the county by the state, because the road functions to link metropolitan highways. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-20 Collector Roads Collectors provide connections between neighborhoods and from neighborhoods to minor business concentrations. It also provides supplementary interconnections of major traffic generators within the metro centers and regional business concentrations. Mobility and land access are equally important. Direct land access should predominately be to development concentrations. In order to preserve the amenities of neighborhoods while still providing direct access to business areas, these streets are usually spaced at one-half mile intervals in developed areas. Major collectors serve higher density residential areas, job and activity centers and freight terminals that are not on the arterial system, and they serve longer local trips, including local bus service. Major collectors are included in the Metropolitan Council’s regional network. Minor collectors serve shorter local trips and lower density land uses and play a key role in the City of Edina’s local roadway network. Major and minor collector roads can be good candidates for bicycle routes because they serve shorter trips that bicyclists make and generally have more compatible traffic speeds and volumes as compared to arterials. Major collector roadways in the Edina are summarized in Table 5.3, below. Table 5.3 Major Collector Roads Street From To Blake Rd./Interlachen Rd. Northern City Limit Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Blake Road Interlachen Boulevard Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Gleason Road TH 62 West 78th Street Valley View Road/Tracy Avenue Gleason Road Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Cahill Road West 78th Street Dewey Hill Road Brookside Avenue Interlachen Boulevard Northern City Limit Dewey Hill Road Gleason Road Cahill Road Antrim Road Valley View Road W 70th Street West 70th Street Antrim Road France Avenue South (CSAH 17) York Avenue S/Xerxes Avenue South (CSAH 31) Northern City Limit Southern City Limit West 69th Street York Avenue S (CSAH 31) Eastern City Limit Local Connector Streets Local Connectors are a subset of Local Roads (below) and are not part of the Metropolitan Council TPP standards. Local Connectors are those with a Local Road functional classification, as defined in the Comprehensive Plan, that meet at least one of the following two criteria: • Average daily traffic (ADT) of at least 1,000 vehicles. • Serves as a connection between neighborhoods, destinations and higher-level roadways. Local Connectors provide continuous walking and bicycling routes, and some may accommodate transit routes as well. While they are essential to the flow of people between neighborhoods and destinations, the needs of Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-21 people passing through must be balanced with the needs of those who live and work along Local Connectors. Local connector streets in the City are depicted on Figure 5.9. Local Roads Local Roads provide the most access and the least mobility within the overall functional classification system. They allow access to individual homes, shops, and similar traffic destinations. Through traffic should be discouraged from using local roads by using appropriate geometric designs and traffic control devices. Local roads serve local travel for pedestrians and bicyclists. Local roads in the City are depicted on Figure 5.9. Jurisdictional Classification State, County, and Municipal Roadways Roadways are further classified on the basis of which level of government owns and has jurisdiction over the given facility. The three levels of government that have involvement are the State of Minnesota (MnDOT), Hennepin County, and the City of Edina. MnDOT owns/maintains the Principal Arterial and Trunk Highway (TH) systems, Hennepin County the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) and County Road (CR) system. The City owns/maintains the local (and local connector) streets, including Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. Figure 5.10 provides a graphic depicting the jurisdictional classification of the overall roadway network serving Edina and its residents, businesses, and institutions. Cities in Minnesota with populations greater than 5,000 are eligible to receive Municipal State Aid (MSA) funding from the state Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. The basic purpose of this program is to help local governments construct and maintain those collector and arterial roadways that have consistent design standards and are well integrated into the overall network of collector and arterial roadways. The State Aid office of MnDOT has established clearly defined design requirements for MSA streets. These requirements ensure that capacity, operational, and safety goals are met in a uniform manner from community to community and that street systems are well coordinated with each other. Based on State Statute, sections 169.80 and 169.87, MnDOT does not allow cities to restrict truck traffic on local or MSA streets. However, cities may restrict trucks over a certain weight depending on road conditions and time of year. Edina’s current (2018) MSA network is identified on Figure 5.11. These roadways are eligible to receive MSA funds for maintenance and/or improvement projects. The MSA network is reviewed every year and may be revised subject to MnDOT State Aid review and approval. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-22 Figure 5.10: Existing Jurisdictional Classification Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-23 Figure 5.11: Existing MSA Network Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-24 Aviation There currently are no airports within the City of Edina. The closest airport is the Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP), which is approximately three and one half miles east of the City. Edina is within the influence area of MSP as determined by Metropolitan Council Guidance (Transportation Policy Plan, Appendix K). Aviation-Related Policies and Ordinances Any person or organization intending to sponsor the construction or alteration of a structure affecting navigable airspace as defined in Federal Regulation Title 14, Part 77 must inform the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) of the project. This notification is accomplished through the completion and submittal of Form 7460. In the case of Edina, this requirement applies to the following circumstances: • any construction or alteration exceeding 200 feet above ground level • any construction or alteration of greater height than an imaginary surface extending outward and upward at a slope of 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest runway (Runway 17/35 at MSP) Aviation-Related Facilities Edina has no permitted seaplane surface waters, tall towers, radio beacons or other air navigation aids located within the city. There is currently one heliport in the City of Edina, which is located at the Fairview Southdale Hospital. Heliports are regulated through City ordinance. Freight A safe, efficient, high-capacity freight transportation system is essential to the economic well-being of Edina, the region, and the state. However, freight movement (by truck and rail) is often regarded as incompatible with other land uses and other modes of transportation. The following is a summary of existing facilities, nodes and issues relating to freight movement in Edina. Figure 5.12 shows roads and railways that carry freight through Edina. Figure 5.13 depicts the current volumes of multi-axle (or heavy commercial traffic) on principle arterials in and adjacent to the City. Freight Facilities While Edina has no intermodal freight terminals, the Canadian Pacific Railway (CP Rail) railroad runs north- south over four miles through the entire city, just west of Highway 100. Currently, freight trains on this portion of the CP Rail line are operated by the Twin Cities and Western (TC&W) Railroad. Approximately two trains run through Edina on CP Rail per day – one in the morning and one the evening. The existing freight rail traffic in the corridor remains about the same as it did in 2001 (about 1-2 trains per day). Some freight improvements/track improvements have been made recently which may lead to increased freight traffic, though specific railroad plans are not known. Other Freight-Related Nodes The Cahill industrial area, located in south-central Edina, consists of two distinct areas. The northwestern corner of this area comprises some residential uses on the north side of West 70th Street and a concentration of commercial (office and retail) and light industrial uses on the south side of West 70th Street. This area is bordered by West 70th Street to the north, the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the east, generally the FilmTech industrial use to the south, and Cahill Road to the west. A small area plan for the northwest corner of this area was approved by the Planning Commission in December 2018 and adopted by Council in January 2019. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-25 The remaining area is bordered by West 70th Street to the north, TH 100 to the east, the southern city limits to the south, and the Canadian Pacific Railroad to the west. The land uses within these borders can best be described as light industrial and business park. With the Great Recession of 2008 and the economic downturn, retail uses and other non-business uses began to appear in this area. At this time it is known that existing land uses in the Cahill industrial area tend to generate multi-axle truck traffic, future plans are somewhat unknown as the City considers preparing a small area or district plan for the area. Another concentration of uses associated with truck traffic is the Southdale commercial district, in southeastern Edina. This area has a large number of commercial and retail land uses that must be served by trucks for deliveries, in addition to the general purpose traffic associated with the district. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-26 Figure 5.12: Freight System Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-27 Figure 5.13: Current Daily Volume of Heavy Commercial Traffic Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-28 Trends and Challenges The City of Edina recognizes the need to increase active transportation through the construction and maintenance of infrastructure, which will improve the livability and sense of community in Edina. When planning for the future it is important to lessen the negative impacts that transportation may have on the environment and neighborhoods and improve connectivity throughout the city. In order to prepare for the coming changes in transportation, including vehicle electrification, connected and automated vehicles, changes in parking demand, technology, funding availability, delivery of goods and the aging population, it is necessary to plan for a balanced transportation system. Walking and Bicycling The following is a summary of Edina’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan, the findings and recommendations of which serve to identify the trends, challenges and opportunities of walking and bicycling in Edina. The full Master Plan is attached as an appendix. Proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks are illustrated on Figures 5.14 and 5.15 on the following two pages. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan is a document to guide Edina’s continuing evolution toward becoming a more walkable, bikeable community that offers its residents a full range of healthy, active and sustainable transportation options for moving in and around the city, and for connecting to its numerous recreational, commercial and entertainment opportunities. Walking and Biking Goals Goals for the plan are twofold: • To increase the number of Edina residents, workers and visitors who walk or bike for transportation, health, fitness, and recreation in the city, and, • To support city, resident and elected officials’ work and efforts to offer the highest quality of life and best experience of their city to Edina residents, businesses, workers and visitors. Community Guidance The plan was developed with the active participation of the Edina community and guidance and consultation with city staff. A vigorous engagement process - using both in-person and innovative online approaches - brought the Edina: A Community of Learning. Edina has a prized education system of high-quality public schools. The Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the importance of extending the benefits of education to the entire community. Collaborating with the Arts and Culture, Heritage Preservation, and Parks and Recreation Commissions and Edina public schools, the Planning and Public Works Departments could incorporate continued learning into infrastructure improvement projects. New sidewalks, for example, might include cast-in alphabets to spur toddler interest in reading, poetry to stimulate us all, original art to tie it all together and certainly dates of construction to help us all understand the effects of time. And all of this could become visual clutter, but under the guidance of the Arts and Culture Commission, it has the possibility to become a pervasive and convincing presence of a commitment to education and learning that can delight the community and indicate that the community is committed to becoming an even better place to live. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-29 Figure 5.14: Proposed Sidewalk Facilities Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-30 Figure 5.15: Proposed Bicycle Facilities Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-31 voice and ideas of well over a thousand Edina residents into the shaping of the plan’s vision and recommendations. The guidance was clear: residents recognize, enjoy and appreciate the many walk/bike assets the City has developed over the last ten years - but there are also many opportunities for improving current conditions and innovating, once again, to develop and offer residents the best, most productive approaches for growing walking and biking in the city. An All Ages and Abilities Network Guidance from Edina residents was very clear: connecting to schools, parks and neighborhoods with safe and comfortable facilities is a key priority. The plan proposes an All Ages and Abilities walk/bike system that is built around a new “Twin Loops” framework connecting key assets in the city through a high-comfort, high-amenity network of walking and biking routes and supporting facilities. The Inner and Outer Loops, working together with the new Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, provide high quality connections tying all four city quadrants and serving Edina schools, community destinations and parks, regional destinations, and adjoining communities. A Comprehensive Approach The plan recognizes the importance of a comprehensive approach for achieving success: a full suite of recommendations - from on-the-ground routes and facilities to a robust set of education, encouragement and other programming initiatives are part of the plan’s “6Es” approach. Bikeshare, educational campaigns, and recommendations for supporting development of new “mobility hubs” in the city are included. Taking Care of What We’ve Got But the plan is not only about making new investments – it is also about recognizing and taking care of the many walk/bike assets Edina has developed over the last few years. Recommendations for maintaining infrastructure and offering a year-round walking and biking network are also a key part of the plan. Implementation - Where We Make it Real Recommendations are great - but none of it counts if we do not build it. The plan includes robust guidance for implementation approaches - from a “test it first” and quick/tactical approach to developing facilities and infrastructure to recommendations for implementing programs. Most important of all, it includes a preliminary evaluation on how to implement the Edina Twin Loops - by looking at opportunities, constraints, and potential phasing for developing the individual segments that will make up this premier, signature walking and biking framework for the City’s transportation network. Several potential funding sources are also identified. Safe Routes to School In 2014 the City of Edina approved its Active Routes to School (ARTS) Plan. The purpose of the ARTS Plan is to identify opportunities and priorities to increase walking and biking to schools and develop an implementation plan for making improvements in these areas. The City worked together with the Edina School District to prepare the plan, and the City has been successful in implementing most of the sidewalk recommendations indicated in the ARTS Plan. Future Transit Service The City of Edina, as an inner ring suburb, has good transit service relative to much of the overall metro region. The existing service and facilities are identified on Figure 5.4. The Southdale Transit Center is one of the busiest Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-32 transit facilities in the region, and there is generally good commuter service to downtown Minneapolis. However, transit service in western portions of the City is quite limited, and the need has been identified to evaluate additional park and ride capacity to improve the usability of commuter service for Edina residents. This will be discussed further under the facilities heading below. As discussed in Chapter 3 of this Comprehensive Plan, the population of Edina is aging to a greater degree than many communities in the region. This trend will likely increase the demand for transit services in coming years. The City should track this and other factors including increasing gasoline costs to assess on-going demand for enhanced scheduled transit service. The City should work with Metro Transit and Southwest Metro Transit to advance such service as demand is identified. Metro Transit provides the great majority of transit service options in Edina, and it would make the determination if service revisions or enhancements would be viable for its service areas. The ability to plan and provide additional transit service is subject to state and regional funding that Metro Transit receives. Facilities Metro Transit’s Central-South (Sector 5) Plan (revised 2004) identified a future 300-500 car park and ride facility at TH 100 and Vernon Avenue. However, the Metropolitan Council’s 2030 Park-and-Ride Plan (adopted 2010) does not include a future park-and-ride facility in Edina. The Plan identifies an existing 1-150 car “transitway facility” at TH 100 and Vernon Avenue, which consists of “hide-and-ride” transit users who park in and around the City-owned parking structure in this location. Given the current limited transit service in the western portion of the City, future evaluation of the need for a more formal park-and-ride facility at this location may be necessary. Future Service Local Circulator Service As discussed above, there is very limited Metro Transit Service in the western portions of Edina. In the past the City has had discussions with Metro Transit regarding additional service to the western areas, perhaps as circulator service. This would involve smaller vehicles that would seat between 12 and 18 riders. At the time Metro Transit determined that there is not enough demand in this area for it to viably provide such service, given its funding limitations. Metro Transit staff cited the relatively high income levels and high rates of car ownership as factors limiting the demand for additional transit service in these areas. The City has evaluated, on a preliminary basis, the option of providing its own circulator service. This would provide service to the western portions of the City and would give those who cannot drive or choose not to an alternative travel mode to use. In summary, the capital costs (in 2008 dollars) for the lowest level of service (“baseline”) evaluated would be approximately $150,000 (three vans), and the annual operating costs would be over $250,000. The more extensive operational scenario evaluated resulted in costs substantially higher. The evaluation summarized above is intended to stimulate preliminary but systematic consideration of circulator service which could increase transit coverage in western Edina. To move this issue forward, a more detailed study will be required to address the following issues: • Clarify the City’s understanding of potential ridership; who will use the service and at what times? • Preferred service type (fixed route vs. flex or “on-demand”) and frequency • If fixed route, identify the optimal routes and stops • If a hybrid fixed route/flex service, identify optimal operating parameters • Hours of operations • Fare structure Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-33 Greater Southdale Area Bus Circulator Service The 2008 Comprehensive Plan recommended that the City conduct a study to assess the viability of a Southdale District shuttle service. In 2018 the City initiated a pilot bus circulator service, called CloverRide and operated by DARTS, that provides service to residential and commercial areas in the greater Southdale area. This fixed- route service runs one day per week during the mid-day, and has a one-hour “loop” through the area, stopping at four (primarily senior) housing destinations and six commercial/retail destinations. While the service runs on a fixed schedule, riders are allowed to request “on demand” stops provided they are proximate to the regular route. City staff and the Edina Transportation Commission will evaluate this pilot program and make recommendations regarding its continued service. This could include changes to stop locations and times, as well as expanded service (e.g. more buses, more stops located in other areas of the city). Light Rail Transit In the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP), the Metropolitan Council has identified a series of transitway corridors for planning purposes. This network is included as Figure 5.16. The METRO Blue Line (Hiawatha LRT Corridor), connecting downtown Minneapolis, the MSP International Airport, and the Mall of America, was completed in 2004. The METRO Green Line (Central LRT Corridor), connecting Downtown Minneapolis and Downtown St. Paul, was completed in 2014. The METRO Green Line Extension (Southwest LRT Corridor) is currently being designed. This LRT corridor will operate on a route from downtown Minneapolis through St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, and Eden Prairie, passing in close proximity to Edina. The line will include 16 new stations and will be part of an integrated system of transitways, including connections to the METRO Blue Line, the Northstar Commuter Rail line, many bus routes, and proposed future transitways. Six planned Green Line stations will be within one mile of the Edina city border; however, the accessibility of each station from Edina varies considerably. The City should continue to work with neighboring cities to make pedestrian and bicycle connections to Green Line stations and cooperate with Metro Transit regarding feeder bus connections. between Edina’s neighborhoods and stations constructed along the Green Line Extension. Heavy construction of the Green Line Extension is scheduled to take place between 2018 and 2022, with passenger service as an extension of the METRO Green Line beginning in 2023. Passenger Rail MnDOT’s 2015 update to the Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Rail Plan guides the future of both freight and intercity passenger rail systems and rail services in the state. While there is no specific mention of Edina, the plan generally provides strong support for increased investment in passenger rail as a response to growing congestion on highways serving the metropolitan area and exurban communities. The Rail Plan identifies an intercity passenger rail line that extends from the Twin Cities to Northfield that would pass through the City of Edina by way of the Canadian Pacific Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway (CP MN&S) subdivision. This corridor is also known as the Dan Patch Corridor and is identified as a Phase 1 project in the plan. This identification indicates it is a desirable project within a 0- to 20-year (2015 - 2035) implementation horizon. A study conducted in 2002 examined the feasibility of establishing commuter rail service along the Dan Patch corridor. At that time, responding to opposition from residents, former State Representative Ron Erhardt introduced legislation that would prohibit state and regional agencies from spending any money to study, plan or design a commuter rail line in this corridor. This legislation, which was passed and has been referred to as the "gag order," applies to state agencies and affected Regional Railroad Authorities but not cities. Based on interest in commuter rail expressed by Edina residents, the City in 2017 conducted a study to gauge public support for passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor through Edina. The majority of public feedback was not supportive of Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-34 Figure 5.16: Metropolitan Council Regional Transitways Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-35 passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor through Edina. The majority of public feedback was not supportive of passenger rail in the corridor; particularly noted are comments coming from residents who live along the route. The study, which is documented in the Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report, concluded with a recommendation that the City should not pursue passenger rail in the Dan Patch corridor at that time. Looking forward, as commuting choices and patterns change and as Edina's transit mode share increases, the City may choose to reassess community acceptance of passenger rail service in the Dan Patch corridor. At this time, at least one other city along the corridor, Savage, has expressed interest in seeing a light rail crossing of the Minnesota River with a connection to Southwest Light Rail as a means to relieve congestion on the US Highway 169 bridge. If implemented, a light rail system between Saint Louis Park and Savage along the Dan Patch corridor would have a profound impact on transportation in Edina. Bus Rapid Transit Metro Transit is currently planning improvements to the Route 6 corridor with the E Line bus rapid transit (BRT) project. The E Line will substantially replace parts of Route 6 in the Hennepin Avenue corridor, serving uptown Minneapolis. Since this BRT line was identified in 2012, community members have expressed interest in a longer BRT corridor to serve more places along Route 6, including extending service along France and/or York Avenues in Edina. Metro Transit is studying the corridor in 2018-2019 to determine whether to extend the E Line south into Edina. Following this corridor study, E Line station planning will begin in 2019 with construction (pending full funding) beginning as soon as 2023. The City of Edina is represented on the study’s Technical Advisory Committee. Future Roadways 2040 Traffic Forecasts Year 2040 traffic forecasts were prepared using the Metropolitan Council travel demand model. The model was refined for application specifically for the City of Edina. The 2040 roadway network assumed for this analysis is the same as the current roadway network, as the City and County Capital Improvement Programs (CIPs) do not include any projects that add significant capacity to the roadway network. While the travel demand model is a valuable tool for identifying future traffic based on the proposed land use impacts, it is not meant for use in detailed traffic operations studies. For a more accurate representation of the transportation impacts from specific developments, detailed traffic studies should be conducted to determine the operational impacts on adjacent roadways and intersections. A central concept of travel demand forecasting is the use of Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs). Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Edina, is divided into a series of TAZs. Each TAZ has land use data which indicates trip generation and trip attraction including population, household, and employment data. Figure 5.17 displays Metropolitan Council TAZs within the City of Edina. Table 5.4 provides the initial population, household, and employment allocations by TAZ assumed in the Metropolitan Council model. Table 5.5 provides the population, household, and employment allocations by TAZ based on the City of Edina’s Land Use Plan adjustments as detailed in Chapter 3. Table 5.6 shows the change in TAZs between the base condition and the adjusted condition. Results of the City of Edina modeling process are summarized on Figure 5.18 showing the 2040 Traffic Forecast (Met Council Base) and Figure 5.19 showing the 2040 Traffic Forecast with Edina Land Use adjustments. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-36 Figure 5.17: Traffic Analysis Zones Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-37 Table 5.4: 2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – Metropolitan Council Base TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment 1022 0 0 0 3 7 0 10 22 0 1395 569 1504 109 577 1472 108 563 1381 110 1396 699 1894 1024 768 1949 1059 804 1919 1091 1397 309 850 35 313 824 38 302 762 40 1398 23 61 1 22 57 1 20 49 0 1403 686 1453 40 698 1440 40 684 1380 40 1404 95 205 193 94 199 197 91 187 200 1408 351 871 6 352 869 8 342 836 10 1409 690 1713 375 701 1732 413 684 1675 450 1410 1288 2735 430 1301 2690 446 1267 2564 460 1411 1241 2498 8998 1263 2466 9092 1237 2375 9106 1412 663 1848 41 670 1860 41 654 1807 40 1413 34 79 570 39 83 577 40 81 580 1414 726 1446 361 734 1416 644 714 1352 951 1415 0 0 219 0 0 237 0 0 250 1416 0 0 868 0 0 930 0 0 1011 1417 61 89 10533 62 91 10884 60 89 11198 1418 757 1505 24 765 1471 48 744 1403 80 1419 356 964 34 361 971 36 352 942 40 1420 342 928 11 348 937 10 342 915 10 1421 452 1225 12 455 1223 11 442 1184 10 1422 158 412 295 162 417 348 161 408 400 1423 671 1604 177 680 1567 183 664 1485 190 1424 602 1640 48 609 1628 49 593 1553 50 1425 358 947 61 362 952 70 352 920 80 1426 322 853 345 328 864 393 322 843 440 1427 834 1911 1163 915 1955 1204 955 1919 1241 1428 353 926 761 358 904 787 352 859 811 1429 475 1248 926 490 1237 955 483 1179 981 1430 480 1261 41 484 1225 41 473 1156 40 1431 459 1236 102 464 1245 116 453 1210 130 1432 326 865 13 330 875 11 322 852 10 1435 708 1879 29 719 1907 29 704 1869 30 1436 123 295 21 142 324 20 151 327 20 1585 1290 2268 5044 1651 2936 5212 1911 3433 5364 1586 290 689 146 302 669 155 302 634 170 1587 531 1244 1593 554 1210 1687 553 1148 1841 Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-38 Table 5.4: 2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – Metropolitan Council Base (Continued) TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment 1588 243 475 3818 333 667 3947 402 813 4063 1593 2182 3723 3266 2400 4229 3375 2504 4547 3472 1594 1981 4411 871 2422 5319 1229 2715 5889 1601 1595 507 1026 5667 591 1208 5724 644 1324 5754 1596 662 1116 2941 880 1508 2993 1036 1811 3032 1637 0 0 450 0 0 508 0 0 560 1640 0 0 140 0 0 140 0 0 140 Totals 22897 51897 51802 24702 54603 53996 25404 55102 56097 Table 5.5: 2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – Adjusted TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment 1022 0 0 0 3 7 0 10 22 0 1395 569 1549 109 577 1496 108 583 1438 110 1396 699 1949 1024 858 2129 1059 950 2340 1091 1397 309 874 35 313 837 38 313 793 40 1398 23 63 1 22 58 1 22 51 0 1403 722 1510 40 734 1470 40 745 1452 40 1404 95 213 193 94 203 197 94 197 200 1408 351 899 6 352 884 8 354 871 10 1409 699 1768 375 701 1761 413 709 1745 450 1410 1288 2837 430 1301 2744 446 1312 2693 460 1411 1241 2596 8998 1263 2518 9092 1281 2499 9106 1412 663 1900 41 670 1888 41 677 1873 40 1413 34 82 570 39 84 577 40 84 580 1414 726 1503 361 734 1446 644 740 1425 951 1415 0 0 219 0 0 237 0 0 250 1416 0 0 868 0 0 930 0 0 1011 1417 120 178 10533 191 305 10884 190 312 11198 1418 757 1565 24 765 1503 48 772 1479 80 1419 356 992 34 361 986 36 365 978 40 1420 342 955 11 348 951 10 354 949 10 1421 452 1261 12 455 1242 11 458 1229 10 1422 158 425 295 162 424 348 167 424 400 1423 671 1657 177 680 1595 183 688 1552 190 1424 602 1688 48 609 1653 49 614 1613 50 Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-39 Table 5.5 –2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – Adjusted (Continued) TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment Households Pop. Employment 1425 358 975 61 362 967 70 365 956 80 1426 328 879 345 334 878 393 340 876 440 1427 834 1977 1163 1001 2135 1204 1045 2283 1241 1428 353 954 761 358 919 787 364 894 811 1429 475 1286 926 490 1257 955 500 1227 981 1430 480 1299 41 484 1245 41 490 1204 40 1431 459 1272 102 464 1264 116 469 1256 130 1432 326 891 13 330 889 11 334 885 10 1435 708 1935 29 719 1937 29 730 1940 30 1436 123 305 21 142 329 20 151 339 20 1585 1290 2370 5044 1717 3114 5212 1996 3699 5364 1586 482 727 146 494 689 155 494 682 170 1587 531 1286 1593 554 1232 1687 572 1201 1841 1588 562 1021 3818 1112 2023 3947 1412 2656 4063 1593 2445 4114 3266 3444 5689 3375 3744 6375 3472 1594 1981 4568 871 2670 5683 1229 2947 6308 1601 1595 726 1509 5667 954 2030 5724 1425 2923 5754 1596 662 1168 2941 839 1536 2993 984 1877 3032 1637 0 0 450 0 0 508 0 0 560 1640 0 0 140 0 0 140 0 0 140 Totals 24000 55000 51802 27700 60000 53996 29800 63600 56097 Table 5.6: 2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – TAZ Changes TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Population Households Population Households Population 1395 0 45 0 24 20 57 1396 0 55 90 180 146 421 1397 0 24 0 13 11 31 1398 0 2 0 1 2 2 1403 36 57 36 30 61 72 1404 0 8 0 4 3 10 1408 0 28 0 15 12 35 1409 9 55 0 29 25 70 1410 0 102 0 54 45 129 1411 0 98 0 52 44 124 1412 0 52 0 28 23 66 Table 5.6: 2040 Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ) Forecasts – TAZ Changes Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-40 (Continued) TAZ 2020 2030 2040 Households Population Households Population Households Population 1413 0 3 0 1 0 3 1414 0 57 0 30 26 73 1417 59 89 129 214 130 223 1418 0 60 0 32 28 76 1419 0 28 0 15 13 36 1420 0 27 0 14 12 34 1421 0 36 0 19 16 45 1422 0 13 0 7 6 16 1423 0 53 0 28 24 67 1424 0 48 0 25 21 60 1425 0 28 0 15 13 36 1426 6 26 6 14 18 33 1427 0 66 86 180 90 364 1428 0 28 0 15 12 35 1429 0 38 0 20 17 48 1430 0 38 0 20 17 48 1431 0 36 0 19 16 46 1432 0 26 0 14 12 33 1435 0 56 0 30 26 71 1436 0 10 0 5 0 12 1585 0 102 66 178 85 266 1586 192 38 192 20 192 48 1587 0 42 0 22 19 53 1588 319 546 779 1356 1010 1843 1593 263 391 1044 1460 1240 1828 1594 0 157 248 364 232 419 1595 219 483 363 822 781 1599 1596 0 52 -41 28 -52 66 Totals 1103 3103 2998 5397 4396 8498 Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-41 Figure 5.18: 2040 Base Forecast Daily Traffic Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-42 Figure 5.19: 2040 Revised (Adjusted) Base Forecast Daily Traffic Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-43 2040 Roadway Deficiency Analysis Congestion on the roadway system is judged to exist when the ratio of traffic volume (number of daily vehicles on a given roadway) to roadway capacity (maximum number of daily vehicles a given roadway can reasonably accommodate) approaches or exceeds 1.0. The ratio of volume to capacity (v/c ratio) provides a measure of congestion along a stretch of roadway and can help determine where roadway improvements, access management, transit services, or demand management strategies need to be implemented. It does not, however, provide a basis for determining the need for specific intersection improvements or other detailed mitigation. Table 5.7 presents high-level estimates of the average daily traffic (ADT) capacity ranges for various types of roadways. These ranges are based on guidance from the Highway Capacity Manual, discussions with the Metropolitan Council, and professional engineering judgment. A range is used since the actual capacity of any roadway design (v/c = 1) is a theoretical measure that can be affected by its functional classification, traffic peaking, traffic composition, access (e.g. intersection or driveway spacing), speed, and other roadway design features such as grade, pavement condition, presence or absence of bike lanes, number of bus stops, type of intersection control devices, traffic signal phasing and timing, pedestrian crosswalks, etc. In order to define a facility’s “daily capacity,” the top of each facility type’s volume range should be used. This allows for capacity improvements that can be achieved by roadway performance enhancements. Another useful capacity analysis index is the level of traffic that a facility can accommodate before it is defined as approaching its capacity limit. A segment of road is noted as “approaching capacity” when observed daily volume equals or exceeds 85 percent of daily capacity (v/c > 0.85). This level of traffic volume is also presented in Table 5.8 by facility type. Table 5.7: Planning-Level Roadway Capacities by Facility Type at Level of Service (LOS) D/E Facility Type Planning Level Daily Capacity Ranges (ADT) Approaching Capacity (85% of ADT) Two-lane urban 8,000-10,000 8,500 Two-lane rural 14,000-15,000 12,750 Two-lane urban with a left-turn lane 14,000-17,000 15,555 Four-lane urban 18,000-22,000 18,700 Four-lane urban with a left-turn lane 28,000-36,800 31,200 Note: The terms urban and rural describe typical section designs (e.g., curb and gutter for urban and ditch drainage for rural). They do not imply geographic areas. Using the methodology described above, capacity deficiencies were identified by comparing existing ADT volumes to the threshold capacities noted in Table 5.8. The existing number of lanes (Figure 5.7) were compared to the forecast daily traffic volumes (Figures 5.18 and 5.19) to develop the 2040 capacity deficiencies. Figure 5.20 shows the base 2040 forecast capacity deficiencies, which were based on the original Metropolitan Council land use projections. Figure 5.21 shows the revised (adjusted) 2040 forecast capacity deficiencies based on Edina’s land use projections. As noted on Figures 5.20 and 5.21, “congested” roadway segments are defined as those with a volume-to-capacity ratio at or above 1.0. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-44 Figure 5.20: 2040 Forecast Capacity Deficiencies (Met Council Base) Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-45 Figure 5.21: Revised 2040 Forecast Capacity Deficiencies Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-46 Based on the 2040 traffic some of the major roadways in the City are expected to operate at levels approaching capacity or over capacity. The following summarizes the road segments anticipated to exceed their design capacity or are expected to approach capacity by 2040: 2040 Met Council Base Forecast Deficiencies: Approaching Capacity: • Interlachen Parkway – Maloney Avenue to W 50th Street • Interlachen Road – TH 169 to Lincoln Drive • Vernon Avenue – Hansen Road to Eden Avenue • Tracy Avenue – Valley View Road to Valley Lane • West 70th Street – Cahill Road to Metro Boulevard • Edina Industrial Boulevard – Bush Lake Road to Metro Boulevard • West 50th Street – Halifax Avenue to France Avenue • France Avenue – North City Limit to West 58th Street • Xerxes Avenue – West 54th Street to West 60th Street • West 70th Street – France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue S • France Avenue – West 70th Street to South City Limit • York Avenue South – West 66th Street to 70th Street • York Avenue South – West 76th Street to South City Limit Over Capacity: • Vernon Avenue – Gleason Road to Hansen Road • Gleason Road – TH 62 to Vernon Avenue • France Avenue – West 58th Street to TH 62 • Xerxes Avenue South – West 60th Street to TH 62 • West 70th Street – TH 100 to France Avenue 2040 Revised Forecast Deficiencies with City Land Use Adjustment: Approaching Capacity: • Interlachen Parkway – Maloney Avenue to W 50th Street • Interlachen Road – TH 169 to Lincoln Drive • Vernon Avenue – Lincoln Drive to Gleason Road • Vernon Avenue – Hansen Road to Eden Avenue • Tracy Avenue – Valley View Road to Valley Lane • West 70th Street – Cahill Road to Metro Boulevard • Edina Industrial Boulevard – Bush Lake Road to Metro Boulevard • W 50th Street – Halifax Avenue to France Avenue • France Avenue – North City Limit to W 58th Street • Xerxes Avenue South – W 54th Street to W 60th Street • France Avenue – West 70th Street to South City Limit • York Avenue – West 66th Street to W 70th Street • York Avenue – West 76th Street to South City Limit Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-47 Over Capacity: • Vernon Avenue – Gleason Road to Hansen Road • Gleason Road – TH 62 to Vernon Avenue • France Avenue – West 58th Street to TH 62 • Xerxes Avenue South – West 60th Street to TH 62 • West 70th Street – TH 100 to York Avenue South Roadway Deficiencies and Improvement Needs The City of Edina is considered fully developed and therefore it is not expected to see substantial traffic increases over the planning horizon in many locations. However, with the anticipated redevelopment of land use in some locations (for example, areas covered by the Small Area Plans), combined with regional traffic trends and considerations, there will be some areas of significant traffic growth. Most (but not all) of the areas identified above as approaching or over capacity in 2040 are two-lane, state-aid roadways, which will require working with other agencies to improve or otherwise mitigate. Taking into account projected future traffic conditions, together with current issues, the following areas have been identified for recommended improvements and/or monitoring and further evaluation: • Gateway area redevelopment • France Avenue (West 70th Street to I-494) • France Avenue (north of TH 62, especially south of West 58th Street) • West 70th Street • Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road (north of TH 62) • Other trunk highway and interchange area These areas and others will be addressed under the following headings. The final heading will address a summary of implementation considerations and requirements. Within the context of this planning level information, individual projects will be identified to be included in the City’s Capital Improvement Programs over the next ten years (until the next Comprehensive Plan Update is required). Potential Problem Locations The primary current problem locations are identified below. Trunk Highway System Congestion Peak period congestion occurs on nearly all of the trunk highway segments passing through or adjacent to the City. This includes I-494, TH 169, TH 100, and TH 62 (Crosstown Highway). In addition to the mainline congestion, queuing from ramp meters provides a source of localized congestion on the City street system as discussed under the following headings. Additional lanes could possibly be constructed to address congestion along TH 62, between TH 169 and Penn Avenue, and along I-494, between TH 169 and the western abutment of the I-494 Bridge over the Minnesota River. Both of these lane addition projects are currently under study, and no decisions to implement them have been made at this time. Freeway Interchange Queues Peak period queuing occurs at most freeway ramps. In particular, the older freeway interchanges with TH 62 at Xerxes Avenue South and France Avenue (see above) have inadequate bridge width and storage capacity to accommodate vehicles waiting at the queue. Similar problems exist along TH 100 at West 70th Street and West 77th Street. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-48 Through Traffic on Local Streets Various residential areas experience, or perceive that they experience, large amounts of through traffic. France Avenue/West 50th Street Intersection This intersection, in the middle of a popular older commercial area, is affected by high pedestrian traffic levels as well as high vehicular traffic volumes. It is a destination for local as well as many non-local visitors. Refer to the 50th & France Small Area Plan for further details. France Avenue North of TH 62 The concentration of recent and future increased redevelopment in the greater Southdale area, along with the congested interchange at TH 62, has the potential to result in congestion on France Avenue north of TH 62. France Avenue transitions from a four-lane to a two-lane roadway at the interchange. Gateway Redevelopment Area Improvements An Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) was prepared by the City in 2007 (with updates in 2013 and 2018) for an area generally bounded by TH 100 to the west, Fred Richards Golf Course/76th Street to the north, France Avenue to the east, and Minnesota Drive to the south. The impetus for the AUAR was the purchase of a parcels within the Study Area by a developer and subsequent discussions with the City regarding their redevelopment. The City decided to review the potential for further redevelopment within the commercial and industrial area along West 77th Street adjacent to these recently acquired parcels. The AUAR reviewed five different scenarios: 1 – Comprehensive Plan (1998), 2 – Master Plan (proposed by developer), 3 – Maximum Commercial, 4 – Maximum Residential, and 4.1 – Modified Scenario 4. Each of these scenarios required its own set of roadway improvements to accommodate the development envisioned for the given scenario. Perhaps the most notable observation is that Scenario 3 (Maximum Commercial) would require reconstruction of the West 77th Street Bridge over TH 100 to provide additional through and turning lanes. Funding requirements may preclude the implementation of this scenario in the foreseeable future. The AUAR identifies improvements that will be required for various types and intensities of development outcomes. The specific improvements that will be required, and the schedule of those improvements, will be dictated by the development projects that are actually proposed and occur over time. It is recommended that the City clarify to developers early in the plan review procedures for this overall area that they must address transportation improvement needs in a proactive manner. The City will coordinate with developers regarding the planning and funding of the improvements, but developers will be required to perform their “fair share” such that needed improvements are identified and implemented in advance of the added traffic volumes. A conceptual east-west connector corridor north of I-494 has been identified for further evaluation and potential long-term implementation. This corridor is identified on Figure 5.22. As shown, it uses West 78th Street, West 77th Street, and West 76th Street with enhanced continuity. It will be further discussed under a separate heading, below. The improvements addressed in the Gateway Area AUAR are considered short to mid-range improvements, with the east-west connector corridor being a long-range concept. France Avenue (TH 62 to I-494) France Avenue between TH 62 and I-494 carries high volumes of traffic. The design of the roadway, 4-lane divided with turn lanes, has a high level of capacity, and roadway actually operates better than what perhaps is the common perception. For example, motorists must wait more than one signal cycle to proceed through an intersection only infrequently even at peak travel times. However, as traffic levels increase as projected on Figure 5.19, congestion on the main portion of this stretch of roadway will become more of a concern. Refer to the transportation section of the Southdale District Area Plan for additional information regarding France Avenue. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-49 TH 62 and Central Areas The primary issue at TH 62 is that there is currently not enough bridge width to provide storage for vehicles waiting in queues on France Avenue at the interchange. To address this issue, in 2019 MnDOT (in cooperation with Hennepin County) re-decked the France Avenue bridge over TH 62 to include a second northbound left- turn lane, with the intent to shorten queuing for vehicles waiting to head westbound on TH 62. Additionally, the sidewalks on both sides of the bridge were significantly widened to improve pedestrian comfort and safety. An additional means to improve this situation is through traffic management, attempting to spread the traffic more equally between the interchanges at Valley View Road, France Avenue, and Xerxes Avenue. Both the Valley View Road and Xerxes Avenue interchanges currently relieve the France Avenue interchange, but efforts can be made to increase this affect. Options that could be further explored include employee training for businesses in the area, to promote increased use of the alternate interchanges, and improved signage indicating the option of using alternate interchanges. However, it is not known how effective such measures could be, short of significant operational or infrastructure projects. There currently does not appear to be any physical/infrastructure projects that could readily be implemented and would have clear benefits in terms of redirecting traffic from France Avenue to York/Xerxes Avenue. Figure 5.22: Conceptual East/West Connector Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-50 However, as redevelopment continues to take place in the Greater Southdale area, the City should promote access and street design that helps make Xerxes/York Avenue a viable alternative to France Avenue. An important limitation of Xerxes/York Avenue in terms of serving as an alternate route for France Avenue is that it does not have an interchange at I-494. As will be discussed under a separate heading, the City should investigate an enhanced east-west connector corridor north of I-494. This would tie into Richfield’s West 76th/ 77th Street corridor. One of the benefits of such a connector route is that it could make the use of Xerxes/York Avenue as an alternate to France Avenue more viable. East-west traffic flow would be enhanced in the southern portion of the City with connections to both France Avenue and York Avenue. I-494 Area The primary operational difficulty on France Avenue at the south end at I-494 relates to the single southbound right turn lane to accommodate both motorists using the ramp to westbound I-494 and those using the loop to eastbound I-494. This causes excessive southbound queuing in the right lane. The proximities of Minnesota Drive and West 78th Street to the interchange exacerbate this problem. Hennepin County has identified a roadway re-striping plan which would help address this problem. This plan separates the traffic turning onto the westbound I-494 ramp from the traffic turning onto the eastbound loop. The City will work with the County and the City of Bloomington to ensure that this improvement takes place. West 70th Street The section of West 70th Street between TH 100 and France Avenue (reconstructed in 2011) is problematic because it experiences relatively high traffic levels for a roadway passing through a residential setting. The traffic levels are due in large part to the basic location and context of the segment. At one end of the segment is an interchange with major highway (TH 100), and at the other end is an important “A” minor arterial roadway (France Avenue) and a major commercial center (greater Southdale area). Traffic levels are currently at the high end of the capacity for a 2-lane roadway with turn lanes, and are forecasted to be over capacity by 2040. East-West Connector Corridor A significant transportation difficulty facing the City is that there is not a continuous east-west reliever roadway on the north side of I-494. Motorists making east-west trips north of the freeway must proceed through a series of roadway segments that are currently not well coordinated or tied into a larger roadway network. Coordinating with adjacent communities, a conceptual corridor has been identified that is depicted on Figure 5.22. This improvement area would align along existing West 78th Street west of E Bush Lake Road, West 77th Street between East Bush Lake Road and Parklawn Ave, and West 76th Street east of Parklawn Avenue. An alternative (and longer-term) alignment between East Bush Lake Road and Parklawn Avenue would involve a new bridge crossing of TH 100, which would relieve traffic levels on the W 77th Street/Edina Industrial Boulevard bridge over TH 100 (see the Long-Term “Alternative Alignment” on Figure 5.22). The rationale behind this concept is to provide a roadway that would serve a similar function to American Boulevard in Bloomington and the West 76th/77th Street corridor in Richfield. It would tie directly into the Richfield corridor. As stated above, it could ultimately relieve congestion through the TH 100/West 77th Street/Edina Industrial Boulevard interchange. It would generally allow more efficient east-west movements and tie into the larger Edina network more effectively. For example, it would make Xerxes/York Avenue easier and more logical to use as an alternative to France Avenue to relieve traffic levels on France. It would likely make this portion of Edina a more attractive location for business and office development because of improved mobility and access. The Gateway Redevelopment discussed under an earlier heading may provide the opportunity to begin roadway reconstruction efforts associated with implementation of the overall East-West Connector concept. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-51 Because this roadway would support and improve operations on trunk highways (TH 100 and I-494), MnDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) would be supportive of such a project. The City should explore the availability of state and federal funding to help advance this concept if it is deemed viable. It should be emphasized that this long-term corridor improvement plan is only conceptual at this point, and no major right-of-way acquisitions are anticipated. However, it is recommended that the City continue to explore the concept and discuss it with adjacent communities, MnDOT, and Hennepin County. The City can also coordinate roadway reconfiguration and reconstruction with the redevelopment of the Gateway area as appropriate. The potential benefits of such a corridor could be quite significant, just as American Boulevard has benefited Bloomington, and the West 76th/77th corridor has benefited Richfield. Summary of Key Implementation Considerations and Requirements Gateway Redevelopment Area Improvements The City should require, early in the plan review procedures for redevelopment projects proposed in this area, that transportation improvements be clearly identified and addressed. The City will expect developers to plan, coordinate and finance their fair share of the required improvements in a proactive manner. Any roadway reconfiguration associated with the Gateway redevelopment will need to be consistent with the long term vision of the East-West Connector roadway summarized below. East – West Connector Roadway The City should continue to coordinate with neighboring communities, Hennepin County, and MnDOT to advance the planning and evaluation of the general corridor identified on Figure 5.22. It is likely a long-term concept, but as redevelopment is proposed and implemented in the southern portion of Edina, consideration should be given to this potential corridor in terms of long term right-of-way issues and access design. Roadway Jurisdictional Issues In general, it is good policy that Hennepin County and MnDOT assume responsibility for and jurisdiction over the arterial network, and cities assume responsibility for the collector and local street systems. This is, to a large extent, the situation in Edina. The existing roadway jurisdictional classification system is depicted on Figure 5.10. At present, there are no roadways in the City under State (MnDOT) jurisdiction that are being considered for turnback to Hennepin County or the City of Edina. However, Hennepin County, in its Transportation System Plan, identifies two roadway segments that are candidates for turnback to the City of Edina (see Figure 5.23): • CSAH 31 (York/Xerxes Avenue) from 50th Street to south City limit (see Figure 5.23) • CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road) from TH 100 to TH 62 (see Figure 5.23) Regarding these segments, the City of Edina does not support either turnback option. These segments should remain under County jurisdiction for the following reasons: • CSAH 31 - This roadway serves an inter-community function, connecting Bloomington, Edina and Minneapolis. It also links with TH 62. It carries a significant percentage of traffic not originating or terminating in Edina. • CSAH 158 - This roadway is an arterial roadway serving an intercommunity function and is therefore appropriate for Hennepin County jurisdiction. It carries a substantial percentage of traffic not originating or terminating in Edina. • Both – At current Municipal State Aid funding levels, the City believes that there would not be enough resources for Edina to maintain these roadway segments in the future. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-52 Figure 5.23: Jurisdictional Turnbacks Proposed by Hennepin County Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-53 In the event the City is ultimately required to accept one or both of the transfers identified above, it should ensure that the roads are brought up to the appropriate design and maintenance standards prior to accepting transfer. Access Management Access management refers to balancing the need for access to local land uses with the need for mobility and safety on the roadway system. Arterials generally have limited access, collectors allow a greater degree of access given their combined mobility/access function, and local streets allow the most access of the roadway functional categories. Appropriate access control preserves the capacity on arterial streets and improves safety by reducing the need for traffic to divert to local streets. It separates local turning movements from higher speed “through” traffic, concentrating traffic linkages at intersections controlled with traffic signals, roundabouts, or other measures. MnDOT and County roadways serving Edina are identified on Figure 5.10. For MnDOT roadways, MnDOT’s access management guidelines apply. These guidelines are included in the Appendix. For County roadways, Hennepin County access management guidelines apply. These guidelines were established in the Hennepin County Transportation System Plan and are included in Appendix T-4. In instances of local site redevelopment, the City will continue to work with these guidelines in the site plan review and approval process. The City’s existing ordinance on curb cut placement limits the placement and number of accesses to local and collector roadways under City jurisdiction. General guidelines include the following: • No driveway on a local street is to be within 50 feet of a street intersection • When properties adjoin two streets, the access should be to the lower volume street Community/Aesthetic Design for Transportation Facilities Community design goals and treatments were discussed in Chapter 3 of this Comprehensive Plan, and in the Living Streets Plan. Roadways are an important component in community design because they represent a significant percentage of the overall land area of any community, they represent public space over which the City has jurisdiction (the municipal right-of-way area), and because they are obviously very visible to many travelers, local and non-local. Refer to chapter three of the Living Streets Plan for detailed descriptions of the type, function and location of Living Streets in Edina, and chapter six for roadway design guidelines. These design guidelines discuss the following design elements (both functional and aesthetic): • Vehicular Facilities (driving and parking lanes, pavement markings and signage) • Pedestrian Facilities (sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, street furniture and public art) • Bicycle Facilities (type and placement, signage and wayfinding and intersections • Traffic Calming (road design, curb extensions, boulevard trees, pavement color/texture) • Stormwater Management and Sustainable Infrastructure (impervious surface reduction; soil, turf and trees; rain gardens; filtration/infiltration; ponds and wetlands) Another important component of the Community Design Guidelines which pertains to transportation and roadways is the guideline for gateways. Gateways define areas with character and a sense of place, and can include such features as street or other lighting, signage, street furniture and public art, and other streetscape improvements. Many of these elements are in place in various districts throughout the City, but other locations could be identified and improved. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-54 Travel Demand Management The primary emphasis of Travel Demand Management (TDM) is to reduce the number of vehicular trips on congested roadways during peak travel times. Since the many or most of these trips are commuter (work) trips, TDM strategies primarily involve places of employment and associated travel behavior. The primary methods or strategies are identified below: • transit • car/van-pooling • telecommuting • flex-time • non-motorized commuting In general, the policies or incentives to promote TDM activities are provided through employers. For example, employers can provide monthly discounts or passes to employees to use transit. They can provide coordination services to match up individuals for car/van pooling activities. They can allow or promote telecommuting, particularly in various industries for which face-to-face contact is not important for task performance. Similarly, employers can allow or promote flex time, which enables employees to travel to/from work at non-peak travel times. Regarding non-motorized commuting, the provision of shower and changing facilities is often helpful to promote bicycle commuting. There is a number of reasons for employers to promote TDM activities. In some cases, vehicle parking is at a premium and anything they can do to reduce parking requirements is beneficial. Another example may be a large employer or group of employers accessed by congested road systems. If these employers can reduce rush hour trips into their facilities and associated congestion, it benefits their workers and makes their places of business more attractive places to work. Some employers wish to reduce vehicle trips to their facilities simply because it is “the right thing to do” for environmental reasons. Cities can increase TDM activities through promotional activities and by coordinating with key employers to identify and implement TDM plans. Cities may require TDM plans for new developments if they are large enough to have significant traffic impacts. Cities can also form or coordinate the formation of Transportation Management Organizations (TMOs). These organizations pool resources and strategies to get the biggest “bang for the buck” for reducing traffic levels in a given area. The City of Edina is an active member of the 494 Corridor Commission, which is a TMO striving to limit single occupancy vehicle trips on I- 494. It is difficult to project the quantitative benefits of Travel Demand Management activities with confidence. However, as fuel prices increase and congestion on major roadways in the metro region increase into the future, the demand for and potential of this approach will increase accordingly. The City of Edina currently requires developers proposing projects with the potential for significant traffic impacts to submit TDM plans as part of the plan review and approval process. The thresholds which are currently in place requiring these plans to be generated are projects that would: • generate 1,000 or more vehicle trips per day, or • generate 100 or more trips during any one-hour period, or • increase the traffic levels on an adjacent roadway by 50 percent or more The City’s requirements in terms of commitment to TDM activities and programs within the TDM plans are currently not rigorous. For example, these plans often simply identify existing transit service within the vicinity of the proposed project to suggest future TDM activities. It is recommended that the City evaluate the option of Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-55 adding “teeth” to TDM requirements for developers, perhaps using the City of Minneapolis and Bloomington programs as a guide. Aviation According to Appendix L of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan, Edina is not a “noise impacted community.” However, members of the community have expressed increased concern over the effects of aircraft noise on their property and quality of life. These issues can be shared with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC), which was established in 2002. The MAC Noise Program Office works closely with the NOC and is dedicated to collecting, analyzing and reporting aircraft operations data for the purpose of working with the communities surrounding the MAC's system of airports on aircraft noise issues. The MSP NOC membership is balanced with community and aviation industry representatives who work together to address aircraft noise issues associated with MSP. The City of Edina is represented through an “at-large” membership on the NOC. Freight Roadway and Bridge Restrictions The only weight-restricted bridge in the City of Edina is the West 50th Street bridge over Minnehaha Creek. Table 5.8 indicates bridges in Edina that have insufficient height clearances (less than 15’-6” clear): Table 5.8 –Bridges with Insufficient Height Clearances Bridge Number Location Height Clearance 7296 Pedestrian bridge over Interlachen Boulevard 14’-2” 27646 Canadian Pacific Rail bridge over Eden Avenue 15’-0” 90641 Canadian Pacific Rail bridge over West 44th Street 14’-3” 94176 Pedestrian bridge over Braemar Boulevard 15’-0” Goals and Policies 1. Improve mobility for residents, visitors and businesses (including those with transportation disadvantages) through the creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists. 1.1. Increase protected and separate bike facilities between nodes, parks, schools and City facilities as indicated in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 1.2. Connectivity between nodes shall be enhanced to include three modes of transportation where at least one is non-motorized. 1.3. Create safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle connections between major traffic generators, with particular emphasis on continuity at roadway and other barrier crossings. 1.4. Connect to regional non-motorized transportation networks by reviewing and recommending pedestrian and bicycle facilities throughout Edina cooperatively with the Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County. 1.5. Support recommendations of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan for implementation. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-56 2. Implement a fully multi-modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina’s environment and neighborhood quality of life and emphasize methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 3.1. Strive for transportation infrastructure designs that have a neutral to positive impact on the natural environment. 3.2. Effectively balance access from and mobility on Edina’s roadways, prioritizing safe and efficient movement between the city’s primary nodes, parks, schools and community facilities. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single-occupant vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicular trips and the use of alternative travel options. 4.1. Take a comprehensive approach to reducing single-occupant vehicle trips by involving those who live, work and shop. 5. Promote a travel demand management (TDM) program through a coordinated program of regulations, marketing, and provision of alternative workplace and travel options. 5.1. Partner with Commuter Services to encourage all forms of travel demand management in order to reduce single occupancy vehicle travel, overall vehicle miles of travel, reduce petroleum consumption, and improve air quality. 5.2. Review and recommend policies necessitating a TDM Plan and/or a transit component with all types of development and redevelopment. Review and implement substantive requirements associated with these TDM Plans, potentially including TDM escrow accounts, transit passes, preferential parking for car-poolers, and other measures. 5.3. Review all major new developments in light of the potential for ridesharing including bus accessibility, preferential parking for carpools/vanpools, and mixed-use development. 5.4. Support preferential treatments for transit and high occupancy vehicles on streets and highways. 5.5. Include transit planning in the construction or upgrading of streets and highways. 6. Encourage and support attractive and reliable high-performance transit service and connections. 6.1. Increase transit options for Edina residents, focusing on connecting the underserved western segment of Edina with the eastern segment. 6.2. Provide transit service to connect nodes and commercial hubs. 7. Develop and manage parking provision to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride-sharing (car pools and van pools), and bicycle parking. 7.1. Encourage and develop preferred locations in surface and structured parking for electric vehicles (personal and shared) and car pool/van pool vehicles. 7.2. Provide or require covered and secure bicycle parking (including e-bicycles) in all parking structures. 7.3. Continuously evaluate the need for, and design of, parking facilities (e.g. effects of autonomous vehicles and future conversion of parking structures to inhabited buildings) and revise regulations as necessary. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-57 8. Invest in infrastructure to support the continued growth in low- to zero-emission technology and support regional and statewide efforts to educate and adopt electric vehicles. 8.1. Continue to install chargers at City facilities where use can benefit residents, City fleet, and partners. 8.2. Ensure that the methodology to determine electric vehicle charging locations considers both public and private facilities with an inclusive and equitable lens. 8.3. Provide residents and businesses the opportunity to learn the benefits of zero emission vehicles through outreach, education and events. 8.4. Advocate for electric vehicle charging programs and incentives with the state, utilities, and car manufacturers. 9. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. 9.1. Through the use of technology, minimize congestion on neighborhood streets and ensure the safety while balancing delivery service requirements. 9.2. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. 9.3. Investigate and implement solutions to minimize the impact of delivery of goods by drone in residential areas. 10. Engage, seek input from and educate all segments of the community regarding transportation-related issues and projects impacting the City. 10.1. Develop and implement methodology for consistent education of motorist, pedestrian and cyclist safety as indicated in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. 10.2. Seek inclusive, equitable and meaningful public participation throughout the community in all transportation studies and projects conducted by the City. 11. Identify new and continuing sources for transportation infrastructure funding by seeking to partner where feasible with federal, state, county and adjacent community sources. 11.1. Pursue and support regional or multi-community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi-community benefit. 11.2. Support research efforts into more efficient and cost-effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces. 11.3. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system. 11.4. Encourage the legislature to continue a dedicated source for funding for efficient mass transit. 11.5. Encourage the legislature to provide stable, long-term roadway funding for capital, operating/traffic management, and maintenance. 11.6. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility. 12. Design roadway facilities according to their intended service function and neighborhood context. 12.1. Upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety or functional needs, taking into consideration environmental limitations. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-58 12.2. Design/enhance residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible with lower speed bicycling and walking. This includes consideration of traffic calming measures on local streets, local connectors and, in some cases, collector streets. 12.3. Use adequate transitions and buffers including, but not limited to, earth berms, walls, landscaping and distance to mitigate the undesirable impact of high volume roadways. 12.4. Consider the use of sound mitigating features for residential development adjacent to high volume roadways, and make property owners and land developers responsible for noise attenuation at new developments near high volume roadways. 12.5. Encourage beautification of local roadways, where appropriate, with amenities such as boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments. 12.6. Monitor and address transportation requirements associated with demographic trends, such as an aging population. 13. Provide and maintain adequate access to and from, and safety on, local and regional roadways. 13.1. Provide logical street networks to connect residential areas to the regional highway system and local activity centers. 13.2. Adequately control access points to the regional roadway system (including minor arterials) in terms of driveway openings and side street intersections. 13.3. Provide access to the local street system (including collector, local connector and local streets) in a manner that balances the need to safely and efficiently operate the street system with the need for access to land. 13.4. Separate, to the extent possible, conflicting uses on the roadway system in order to minimize safety problems. Give special attention to pedestrian and bicycle routes. 13.5. Review and update regional and local functional street classification and coordinate with adjacent cities and Hennepin County. Review and recommend traffic calming policies and consider traffic calming implementation where requested by residents using the Living Streets Plan as the primary guide. 13.6. Review and monitor citywide traffic volumes, congestion, existing traffic calming devices and measures, accident history, vehicle violation history, speed limits and enforcement. 13.7. Educate public on vehicle operations including public relations campaigns that focus on individual responsibilities to each other rather than individual rights only. 13.8. When requested by the Edina Transportation Commission and/or the Planning Commission, review land use that may impact traffic implementations. Continue to monitor adjacent community redevelopment and other activity that potentially impacts the City of Edina. 13.9. Evaluate and implement measures required for school safety. 14. Manage, maintain and operate roadways to maximize wherever possible the safety and mobility of all users and all modes. 14.1. Cooperate with other agencies having jurisdiction over streets and highways in Edina to assure implementation of Living Streets elements, good roadway conditions and operating efficiency. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-59 14.2. Continue the implementation of the I-494 frontage road system through ongoing coordination with MnDOT, Hennepin County, and the cities of Richfield and Bloomington. 14.3. Maintain roads by repairing weather-related and other damage. Continue current on-going pavement improvement plan. 14.4. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal. 14.5. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems. 14.6. Track developments regarding the most current transportation systems and technologies, evaluate and implement as warranted. 14.7. Support state legislation to decrease statutory urban speed limits from 30 to 25 miles per hour. Transportation Objectives Previous sections of this chapter have examined existing conditions, as well as future issues, needs, and recommendations. This section discusses the City’s transportation objectives. By adopting the overall Comprehensive Plan Update including the Transportation Chapter, the City Council will establish the guidelines by which decisions regarding transportation facilities and programs will be made in Edina. The City should periodically review the assumptions under which the plan was developed, including estimates of future development, changing financial resources, citizen and governmental input, and other factors which may arise, and update the plan as appropriate. Roadways • France Avenue – work with Hennepin County to ensure the overall operation and safety of this roadway, particularly at its interchanges with TH 62 and I-494. • Gateway redevelopment project area –with a developer to define roadway needs and ensure that the developer(s) participates appropriately in the funding of improvements. • East-west connector roadway – continue to coordinate with adjacent communities, MnDOT, and Hennepin County to discuss and advance this concept (identified on Figure 5.22) as appropriate. • Jurisdictional Classification – Hennepin County has identified two roadway segments as potential candidates to turn back to the City. The City opposes these reclassifications. The City should coordinate as needed with Hennepin County to demonstrate that turning back jurisdictional authority to the City is not appropriate for the following locations: o Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road (CSAH 158) between TH 62 and TH 100 o York/Xerxes Avenue (CSAH 31) between I-494 and 50th Street (CSAH 21) • Review and potentially implement the option of increasing TDM requirements for developers. Transit • Continue efforts to establish a park-and-ride facility at TH 100/50th Street. • Continue to evaluate the feasibility of circulator service focusing on the western portion of the City, and evaluate the existing CloverRide shuttle service in the Greater Southdale area. Bicycling and Walking • Use the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan to identify ongoing bicycle projects for feasibility review and implementation as warranted. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-60 • Working in conjunction with roadway or other infrastructure improvement projects, construct sidewalks on an on-going basis consistent with the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Funding Funding for transportation improvements and programs can be obtained from a variety of sources, as summarized below: • General Ad Valorem (Property) Taxes – Transportation projects can be funded with the general pool of municipal revenues raised through property taxes. • State Aid – Cities with populations of greater than 5,000 are eligible for funding assistance from the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund (funded with the state gas tax and vehicle taxes, as well as federal transportation funds through MnDOT). These funds are allocated to a network of Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets. Currently, the City of Edina receives an apportionment per year for improvements to its MSA streets, which are typically collector roadways higher in functional classification. • Federal Transportation Funds – The guidelines for direct federal funding for transportation projects are established under the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act. These funds are allocated by the Metropolitan Council which serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Roadway, transit, non-motorized, and other transportation-related projects are selected on a competitive basis based on evaluation, prioritization, and recommendation by the Metropolitan Council’s Transportation Advisory Board (TAB). The process of solicitation for project proposals and resulting allocation of federal funding to selected projects occurs every two years. The next round of solicitation for proposals will take place in 2019. • Cooperative Agreements with MnDOT and/or Hennepin County – Different levels of government can cooperate on planning, implementing, and financing transportation projects which provide benefits to all the concerned agencies. The financial terms and obligations are generally established at the front end of the projects. • Tax Increment Financing (TIF) – This is a method of funding improvements that are needed immediately by using the additional tax revenue anticipated to be generated because of the given project’s benefits in future years. The difference between current tax revenues from the targeted district and the increased future tax revenues resulting from the improvements is dedicated to retiring the municipal bonds used to finance the initial improvement(s). • Developer Contributions/Impact Fees – Under this approach, the impact of the additional traffic from a proposed development on the local roadway system is projected, using standard traffic engineering procedures. Costs associated with improving the roadway system to handle the additional traffic at an acceptable level of service are assessed to the developer. This approach generally involves some level of negotiation between the local government and the developer to work out a cost-sharing agreement that allows the development to move forward. • Assessments – Properties that benefit from a roadway scheduled for improvement may be assessed for the cost of construction. In order to assess the owner, it must be demonstrated that the value of their property will increase by at least the amount of the assessment. Edina Comprehensive Plan 5. Transportation Chapter – Approved 08-18-20 5-61 • Utility Franchise Fees – The City’s Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund is one example of using franchise fees for public improvements. The PACS Fund is generated from franchise fees on customers of electric and gas utilities in Edina are dedicated to the construction and maintenance of non-motorized infrastructure. In addition to these methods, the City should always consider negotiating with business and medical centers to help fund transportation improvement projects, large or small, which would have direct benefits to those centers. Two potential sources of transportation funding have been proposed and discussed for a number of years but are not currently allowed under state law. They are: • Road Access Charge – All new developments would be charged based on the trip generation rates of the given development, without an estimation or documentation of specific traffic impacts or improvement requirements. It would be analogous to the Sewer Access Charge (SAC) for access to the Metropolitan Council’s sanitary sewer system. Revenues from this source could be used to build or improve collector and arterial roadways within the local jurisdiction collecting the tax. • Transportation Utility Billing – All properties within the local jurisdiction would be subject to a periodic fee, based on the number of vehicle trips generated by the type of property. The pool of funding generated in this manner would be used for community-wide transportation improvements such as preventive maintenance and road reconstruction. The periodic nature of the billing would be beneficial in terms of supporting on-going or routine roadway maintenance projects through the entire network. The City should continue to support and promote the passage of legislation at the state level which would allow these forms of dedicated local transportation revenue generation. Capital Improvement Program The City has a Capital Improvement Program that is used to guide transportation investments within the community. The process includes analyzing projects that contribute to the maintenance and improvement of the transportation network based on the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision, Principles, and Implementation elements. The City Council updates the Capital Improvement Program biannually to reflect the changing needs of our transportation network. Transportation Commission Work Plan Initiatives 2013-2023 Year Initiative Description Partners 1 Review existing crossing policy and recommend changes with consideration for local amenities such as parks and schools. 2 Develop a priority list of high-traffic corridors and ideas for bike friendly improvements. 3 Review the safety, accessibility, and amenities along the existing France Avenue Transit Corridor for pedestrians, bicylists and transit riders between Minnesota Drive and Highway 62 (Southdale District). Investigation will include site visits and review of similar case studies that promote non-automobile transportation modes along similar scale roadways and will include input from key stakeholders. Inquiry is in response to the Climate Action PLan and new parking ordinances. 4 Review options for replacement and new boulevard tree planting programs.5 Appoint Commissioner to serve on the Cahill small area plan working group. 6 Consideration for future parking in Edina to identify parking initiatives to pursue in the next 10-15 years, in what order and what Commissions/resources should be assigned to each.PC, EEC 1 Research, develop and recommend a citywide boulevard tree policy that addresses planting, protection, maintenance, removal and funding EEC 2 Develop a public transit checklist to review on proposed development projects.PC 3 Review and recommend changes to the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund policy. 4 Study the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and report on potential Safe Routes to School demonstration projects. 5 Study and report on other agencies' process for completing traffic safety studies related to development/redevelopment projects. 6 Review the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and recommend changes to proposed facilities to improve connectivity to public transit. 1 Investiage the impacts of organized trash collection while considering the travel demand management objectives, environmental goals and reducing wear-and-tear on City streets.EEC 2 Continue representation on 2020 Street Funding Task Force until task force is complete. 3 Review and comment on the CloverRide circulator bus service contract operations and marketing throughout the year as it is brought to them from the CloverRide advisory committee. 4 Review and comment on monthly Traffic Safety Reports. 5 Review and comment on roadway reconstruction projects and projects funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist (PACS) Fund. Commission will also review and comment on staff's application of the equity criteria. 6 Review and comment on traffic impact studies and Travel Demand Management plans associated with proposed developments. 7 Review the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and recommend changes to the proposed pedestrian and bicycle networks to improve connectivity to future Metro Transit LRT and BRT services. 1 Review and evaluate performance of CloverRide circulator services (North and South) and make recommendations to Council for future service after contracts expire. 2 Review and comment on traffic impact studies associated with propsoed developments. 3 Review and comment on staff's recommendations for Travel Demand Management policy/ordinance. 4 Review and comment on staff's framework for the completion of traffic impact studies conducted for proposed development/redevelopment projects. 5 Develop and coordinate up to six educational activities to inform the community about transportation safety (which will include an annual community event). 6 Review and comment on monthly Traffic Safety Reports. 7 Review and comment on proposed Capital Improvement projects, including roadway reconstructions and projects funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund. 1 Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee to review Travel Demand Management options and recommend a TDM policy or ordinance for Council consideration PC 2 Serve on a cross-commission committee to determine if a process is feasible for the Transportation Commission to provide input on transportation-related issues, including traffic study results associated with development/redevelopment PC 3 Annually, spring through fall, the commission with coordinate an educational campaign to inform community members about pedestrian, bicycle and motorist safety which will include an annual community event 4 Monitor and evaluate the CloverRide circulator service and make recommendations to Council for future service after twelve-month agreement expires 5 Review and comment on PACS Fund allocating process with a race and equity lens CHC, HRRC, PARC 6 Serve on a cross-commission committee to complete requirements for Edina to receive the AARP City Designation 7 Serve on a cross-commission committee to develop a draft plan on Edina Grand Rounds, including wayfinding PARC 1 Recommend pilot plan for Edina/Southdale Circulator including pilot routes and evaluation plan for the Edina/Southdale Bus Circulator Pilot Project 2 Invite neighboring transportation commission to have joint meeting with the Edina Transportation Commission 3 Review and comment on solutions for high school motor vehicle traffic and parking affecting neighborhoods adjacent to Edina High School 4 Assist as requested with the development of the City's new Comprehensive Guide Plan PL Define and implement equity criteria for PACS Fund projects, and integrate with the City's Race and Equity Task Force efforts 1 If City staff secures funds, support and guide the engagement process for, and potential study of, passengar rail in Edina 2 Assist as requested with the development of the City's new Comprehensive Guide Plan3Review transportation impact analysis process to better implement Living Streets PC 4 Review and comment on transportation projects in the Capital Improvement Plan, mill and overlay/seal coat projects, and monthly traffic safety reports 5 Review and comment on pedestrian and bicycle master plan 1 Study and report community circulator 2 Organize and host a transportation-themed event with speaker(s) 3 Prepare and comment on Comprehensive Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for inclusion in 2018 Comprehensive Plan 4 Review Edina To Go app and provide recommendations to staff regarding organzation/sategoes for reporting concerns related to streets/transportation 5 Review data from City's QLS (2011, 2013, 2015) and conduct 2 public meetings to identify gaps around the City's transportation systems 6 Make recommendations to staff for evaluation of the Living Streets and Streets Smarts outreach campaigns 7 Provide input to staff on the creation of a walking map of the City indicating routes and areas of interest 1 Review and recommend modifications to roadway reconstruction project survey content and methodology 2 Review and recommend modifications to Traffic Safety Request process3Greater Southdale Area Transportation and Circulator Study implementation 4 Study access to and from Southwest LRT stations in St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Eden Prairie 1 Living Streets Plan 2 Meet with Police Department and Public Works annually to discuss shared interests such as traffic education and enforcement, street maintenance as it affects cyclists and pedestrians, etc. 3 Valley View Rd between Gleason Rd and Antrim Rd - work with school district and Active Routes to School working group to address traffic issues 4 Educational safety campaign 1 Living Streets Policy implementation 2 Review transportation projects in the proposed Capital Improvement Program 3 TLC Bike Boulevard project PL Grandview Area Transportation Plan implementation 2022 2023 2021 2020 2013 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Date: September 21, 2023 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Transportation Commission Item Type: Other From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Proposed 2024 Regular Meeting Dates Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff memo with proposed 2024 regular meeting dates. ATTACHMENTS: Description Memo: Proposed 2024 Regular Meeting Dates City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 September 21, 2023 Transportation Commission Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner Proposed 2024 Regular Meeting Dates None; information only. Information / Background: Historically, the Transportation Commission has held their regular meetings on the third Thursday of each month at Edina City Hall (4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN, 55424). For the 2024 calendar year, the regular meeting dates are as follows; January 18 July 18 February 15 August 15 March 21 September 19 April 18 October 24* May 16 November 21 June 20 December 19 *The October regular meeting is proposed for the fourth Thursday of the month so as not to coincide with the annual Minnesota Educators Academy (MEA) conference.