Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-06-08 EEC AgendaAgenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room Meeting will take place in person. Masks are optional. Thursday, June 8, 2023 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission May 11, 2023 V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Special Presentation: 2023 Water Resources Update VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.Consultant Report: Proposed Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Public Input Results B.Comment on 2024 Commission Climate Action Menu C.2024 Workplan Development Kicko0 D.Monthly call for communication requests VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Sta0 Comments X.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli6cation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Minutes From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission May 11, 2023 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve EEC meeting minutes, May 11, 2023 INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description EEC Minutes: May 11, 2023 Agenda Energy and Environment Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall - Community Room Meeting will take place in person. Masks are optional. Thursday, May 11, 2023 7:00 PM I.Call To Order Chair Martinez called the meeting to order at 7:04pm. Chair Martinez welcomed special guest City Manager Neal. II.Roll Call Answering roll call were Chair Martinez, Vice Chair Lukens, Commissioners Haugen, Hovanec, Lanzas, Schima, Tessman, Weber and Student Commissioner Machart Late: Commissioner Dakane arrived at 7:46pm Absent: Student Commissioner Rawat III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Cory Lukens to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Energy and Environment Commission April 13, 2023 Motion by Hilda Martinez Salgado to Approve Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Bayardo Lanzas. Motion Carried. V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Special Presentation: Board & Commission Member Review Commissioners received a presentation from City Manager Scott Neal regarding the annual Board and Commission review. B.Special Presentation: EV Carsharing in Edina Commissioners received a presentation from UMN graduate students affiliated with the Resilient Communities Project regarding potential EV car- sharing in Edina. C.Special Presentation: Draft 2023 State of Sustainability Commissioners received a presentation from Staff Liaison Hancock regarding the draft State of Sustainability. VI.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII.Reports/Recommendations A.EEC Working Group 2023: Carryout Bags The EEC approved adding Madeline Isaacson to the Carryout Bags working group. Motion by John Haugen to Approve new member of Carryout Bags Working Group. Seconded by Cory Lukens. Motion Carried. B.Staff Report: Conservation and Sustainability Fund The EEC received the annual Conservation and Sustainability Fund report. C.Nominate Human Services Task Force Volunteer EEC discussed which Commissioner would join the City's Human Services Task Force. Two Commissioners agreed to review their schedules and confirm or decline participation. VIII.Chair And Member Comments IX.Staff Comments X.Adjournment The EEC meeting was adjourned at 9:01pm. Motion by Teri Hovanec to Adjourn. Seconded by Tom Tessman. Motion Carried. T he City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Other From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Special Presentation: 2023 Water Resources Update Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None, information only. INTRODUCTION: Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Manager, will present to the EEC an annual update on Edina's water resources activities. ATTACHMENTS: Description Presentation: Water Resources Manager Annual Report The CITYofEDINAThe CITYofEDINAWater Resources Manager’s ReportJessica V. Wilson, CFMJune 8, 2023 The CITYofEDINACore Services of Water Resources Programwww.EdinaMN.gov2 The CITYofEDINA•Incorporated into Water Resources Management Plan in 2022•Codification in progressFlood Risk Reduction Strategywww.EdinaMN.gov3 The CITYofEDINAFlood Risk Reduction Strategywww.EdinaMN.gov4Comprehensively reduce risk throughout the community. The CITYofEDINAResources•Interactive Flood Risk Map•Actions for Flood Resilient Homes –common actions to reduce your exposure and vulnerability to floodingwww.EdinaMN.gov5www.EdinaMN.gov/flooding The CITYofEDINABetterTogetherEdina.org/MorningsideNotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov6 The CITYofEDINAWe’re seeking input on:•The clean water vision (community values and goals)•Priority pollutants•Priority waterbodiesHow to participate:•June 25 3-5pm at Walnut Ridge Park shelter building•June 26 10am-noon at Rosland Park pavilion•June 27 6-8pm at Arden Park shelter building•June 29 4-6pm at Braemar Golf Course, the Hoyt and Blanchard meeting room•Online atwww.bettertogetheredina.org/clean-water-strategyClean Water Strategywww.EdinaMN.gov7 The CITYofEDINAwww.EdinaMN.gov8BetterTogetherEdina.org/Clean-Water-StrategyNotable Projects The CITYofEDINALake Summaries•Available through the Water Resources Librarywww.EdinaMN.gov9 The CITYofEDINAninemilecreek.org/whats-happening/current-projects/lake-cornelia-project/Notable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov10 The CITYofEDINALake Cornelia•Rosland Park Stormwater Filtration BMP Project (Construction completed, 2022)•In-lake Alum treatment (May 2020)•Goldfish and Carp Management (initiated in 2020)•Shoreline restoration (installed in 2020)•Invasive curly leaf pondweed control (annual)www.EdinaMN.gov11 The CITYofEDINABetterTogetherEdina.org/Bristol-Mavelle-ParkNotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov12 The CITYofEDINABristol & Mavelle Park/Lynmar Basinwww.EdinaMN.gov13May 2023 (looking southeast)April 2023 (looking northwest) The CITYofEDINANotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov14https://www.ninemilecreek.org/whats-happening/current-studies/arrowhead-and-indianhead-lakes-study/ The CITYofEDINANotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov15https://www.ninemilecreek.org/whats-happening/current-studies/mirror-lake-study/ The CITYofEDINABetterTogetherEdina.org/MelodyShorelineNotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov16 The CITYofEDINABetterTogetherEdina.org/WooddalePathNotable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov17 The CITYofEDINANine Mile Creek Streambank Stabilization (2018-2019) and Vegetation Enhancement (2022 and beyond)Notable Projectswww.EdinaMN.gov18Before and after stabilization on Reach 1Buckthorn removal in Reach 1 The CITYofEDINAGroundwater•Groundwater wells interactive map•Private Well Policy•Well sealing grants •Wellhead Protection Plan update in near future•Queuing up CAP water conservation initiativeswww.EdinaMN.gov19 The CITYofEDINAPrivate groundwater wells•2,400+ sealed wells•1,000+ status unknown•39 residential domestic userswww.EdinaMN.gov20 The CITYofEDINA•Edina is a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) community, permitted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency•New permit coverage issued September 2021Pollution Preventionwww.EdinaMN.gov21Street sweeper The CITYofEDINA22More than 2000 structuresAbout 80 miles of stormwater mainsMajority of system installed in 1950s and 1960sOperation and Maintenance The CITYofEDINA23City-owned and Non-City-owned structural stormwater control measures•Filtration facilities•Infiltration basins•Stormwater ponds•Tree trenches•Vegetated swales•Underground treatment devicesInspections The CITYofEDINADevelopment/Redevelopment•Erosion and sediment control during construction•Stormwater managementand runoff controlwww.EdinaMN.gov24 The CITYofEDINAIllicit Dischargeswww.EdinaMN.gov25 The CITYofEDINAChloride•Proposed priority pollutant for the Clean Water Strategy•Ongoing training and tech upgrades•Launched new Low Salt, No Salt Minnesota program in 2023•Grant from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to buy new winter maintenance equipment for Braemar Arena in 2022•Environmental Leadership Award recipient at 2019 Road Salt Symposiumwww.EdinaMN.gov26Segmented plow blades more effectively clear snow so less salt is used The CITYofEDINACommunity Engagementwww.EdinaMN.gov27CleanWaterMN.org The CITYofEDINAAdopt-a-Drain•Launched in Edina March 2019•City sponsors welcome kits with yard signs -18 in 2022www.EdinaMN.gov28www.adopt-a-drain.orgwww.cleanwatermn.org The CITYofEDINAwww.EdinaMN.gov29 The CITYofEDINA•Linked on Parks and Trails webpageNatural Resources Interactive Storymapwww.EdinaMN.gov30 The CITYofEDINAInteractive Maps•Bathymetry (lake topography)•Flood inundation areas•Storm sewer network•Clean water infrastructure•Groundwater contamination vulnerability•Nature restoration projects•And more…Water Resources Library•Lake Summary sheets•Department of Natural Resources permits•Plans, policies, studies•Water related agreements•Bathymetry map PDFs•FEMA floodplain property PDFs•And more…Water Resources Information online www.EdinaMN.gov31 Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Consultant Report: Proposed Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Public Input Results Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive consultant report detailing public input process and results for proposed carryout bag fee ordinance. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Consultant Report: Proposed Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance 1 City of Edina Potential Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Community Engagement Summary Report June 5, 2023 Prepared by Ann Tennes, President, Ann Tennes Communications, LLC Project Overview In early 2023, the Edina City Council (Council) directed staff to draft an ordinance proposal requiring that all City of Edina merchants, including retail establishments and restaurants, charge a minimum $0.05 fee to customers for all carryout bags. The potential ordinance is envisioned to: ● Require that merchants charge a minimum $0.05 for all carryout bags, regardless of bag material ● Allow the retail establishment or restaurant to keep the fee for use at their discretion ● Require businesses to report to the City annually the quantity and type of carryout bags purchased and distributed customers as well as the fee amount collected This initiative follows Council’s 2022 approved work plan initiative for Edina's resident volunteer Energy & Environment Commission (EEC) to “Revise and update EEC’s 2017 report on possible recommendations for a plastic bag ordinance” with a deliverable of an “updated report with recommendation.” The potential carryout bag fee ordinance meets several goals established in the City’s Climate Action Plan approved in December 2021, including: ● Strategy WM 1: Decrease total per-capita municipal solid waste handled 5% by 2030, in part by: ○ WM 1-5: Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plastics, including plastic bags, by 2025 On February 7, 2023, the EEC recommended to Council that "...the City require that merchants charge a $.05 fee to customers for carryout bags. EEC asks Council to direct staff to write an ordinance that updates City Code to include this requirement and implement an outreach plan to inform residents and businesses of this requirement." Council received this recommendation and directed staff to draft an ordinance and seek public feedback. During April and May 2023, City staff sought broad-based public feedback from Edina residents and businesses regarding the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. This report provides a summary of the community engagement methods employed to elicit public feedback and the responses, opinions and suggestions received from the Edina community. 2 Community Engagement Outreach Methods and Promotion City Sustainability Manager Grace Hancock and project consultant Ann Tennes, President, Ann Tennes Communications, LLC, employed the following public feedback outreach methods during April and May 2023: ● Better Together Edina webpage to share information on the potential carryout bag fee: https://www.bettertogetheredina.org/carryout-bag-ordinance ● Online survey modules created and linked from the Better Together Edina project webpage ○ Posted from April 14 through May 15 ○ Initial survey question sorted respondents into either resident, visitor or business modules ● Virtual roundtable discussions scheduled on May 5, 10 and 11 ● One-on-one interviews with Edina business leaders, owners, managers and corporate representatives City staff promoted the availability of these public feedback opportunities through the following outreach platforms: ● Print ad featured on page two of the May 2023 Edition: Edina ● Virtual ads featured in the Edina Chamber of Commerce weekly e-newsletter and both the Edina Rotary and Morningside Rotary Club weekly e-newsletters ● CivicPlus email to Sustainability newsletter subscribers ● Video segment featured in the early May Agenda: Edina video ● Social media posts featured across City channels Community Engagement Results Following is a summary of the participation in and public feedback received from each community engagement method: Better Together Edina site Between April 14 and May 30, the project page received 994 views. 555 visitors interacted with some part of the project page (clicking on a link, downloading a document), and 215 visitors engaged with the survey tool. Surveys Between April 14 and May 15, a total of 201 residents, five business representatives and four visitors responded to the surveys linked from the Better Together Edina website. The responses are summarized in this report, and the entire data sets, with respondent identification information removed, are attached. (Exhibits 1, 2, 3) 3 Resident Responses - Executive Summary In general, Edina residents responding to the online survey did not favor a carryout bag fee, with some support for a voluntary fee and less support for a mandatory carryout bag fee requirement. Residents expressed a desire for expansion to weekly recycling collection, concerns about a carryout bag fee being government overreach and the need for the City to focus more on waste reduction from apartments and schools. Of the three residents who signed up for the virtual roundtable discussions, two were generally in favor but had specific questions, and one was opposed. Clearly, the online survey was the most effective method of eliciting opinions from Edina residents. Resident Responses - Online Survey 1. How Residents Currently Interact with Carryout Bags ● Survey question: How often do you reuse carryout bags, if at all? Examples include: plastic bags for trash liners, paper bags for recycling, etc. ○ Possible answers: ■ Never ■ Rarely ■ Sometimes ■ Very Often ■ Always ○ How Edina residents answered: ● Highest incidence of reuse as indicated by ‘Always’ response ○ Brown paper bags - 47 percent ○ Plastic bags - 29 percent ○ Reusable bags - 28 percent ● Lowest incidence of reuse as indicated by ‘Never’ response ○ Compostable bags - 29 percent ○ Reusable bags (plastic bags) - 15 percent ○ Reusable bags (cotton or fabric) - 13 percent ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 1): Figure 1 4 In response to this question, some 61 percent of residents reported using reusable bags most frequently for grocery store trips, least frequently when shopping at multiple locations, and some 19 percent indicated they never use reusable bags. 2. Resident Support for a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 2): Figure 2 Nearly 27 percent of residents said that even a $0.01 fee would preclude them from using a carryout bag. On the opposite end of the scale, more than 23 percent of residents said the carryout bag fee would need to reach $1.00 per bag to stop them from purchasing a carryout bag. ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 3) Figure 3 When residents were asked to rank three options from most to least preferable, with one being their most preferred option and three their least preferred, responses fell in this average-rank order: ● No carryout bag fee is implemented - 1.74 average ranking, meaning that this option was the most preferable to residents 5 ● A carryout bag fee is implemented that merchants can participate in voluntarily - 2.04 average ranking, indicating that most residents ranked this their second choice ● A carryout bag fee is implemented with all merchants required to comply - 2.22 average ranking, placing this as the least preferred option by a small margin ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 4) Figure 4 ● When asked whether a per-bag fee should be implemented for various types of carryout bags, residents generally: ○ Favored a fee for plastic bags; while plastic bags received the highest number of yes responses regarding a potential fee, at 96, the number of no responses for requiring a fee per plastic bags was slightly lower at 88 ○ Did not favor a fee for paper, compostable or reusable bags, with only 50, 29 and 50 affirmative responses, respectively ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 5) Figure 5 More than 56 percent of residents said they would prefer to patronize a business that provided a credit or rebate for customers bringing their own bag or bags, with nearly 38 percent saying they had no preference. In tandem with this, residents were asked to respond yes or no regarding their willingness to participate in a reusable bag supply or exchange program such as the Bull City Boomerang Bag initiative. Resident responses evidenced somewhat low interest, with just over 36 percent of residents saying they would participate and nearly 64 percent indicating they would not participate. 3. Resident Suggestions for City Education for a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance 6 ● Survey question and possible answers (Figure 6) Figure 6 When asked to rank five options on how the City might help them prepare if a carryout bag fee ordinance is passed, with one being their most preferred option and five their least preferred, responses fell in this average-rank order: ○ Informational signage at grocery stores, malls and other stores - 1.94 average ranking, placing this as the most desired option ○ Receive a postcard in the mail with notice of the coming change - 2.61 average ranking ○ Receive a free reusable bag from the City - 2.61 average ranking ○ City presence at events I’m already attending to provide information on the coming change - 3.44 average ranking ○ City offer a standalone informational event on the coming change - 4.40 average ranking, placing this as the least preferred option 4. Resident Responses to Open-Ended Questions Regarding a Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance In addition to the mandatory, multiple-choice or ranking questions, the survey also featured two open-ended questions, including: How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? The 138 residents who responded to this question had varied opinions, both in support of and in opposition to the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, and provided numerous suggestions. Some of the predominant themes and percentages they were cited include: ● Potential ordinance is government overreach - 23 percent ● Expand to weekly recycling collection, expand recyclables accepted, enhance education - 23 percent ● Ban plastic bags completely - 12 percent ● Work with businesses on providing incentives for customers to bring their own bags - 10 percent ● Focus on business, school and apartment recycling programs - 8 percent 7 A brief selection of unedited comments received in response to the first open-ended question includes: ● “Banning plastic bags.” ● “Government over step on the bag issue. People create waste. Taxing bags is not the answer.” ● “Dedicate time, money, and resources to find innovative ways to reduce waste rather than simply charging residents more money for everyday activities.” ● “weekly recycling option or place to drop off overage. We fill our recycling each week b/c we get the paper and recycle everything we can. When we are out of town on a recycling week, no way can we fit 4 weeks of recycling into one bin.” ● “Recycling every week versus every other week.” ● “support a recycled bag program” The second open-ended question asked What other questions do you have about this proposal? Some of the primary themes cited by the 95 residents who responded to this question includes: ● Government overreach; don’t favor the ordinance - 21 percent ● Concern about businesses retaining bag fees and using it at their sole discretion - 14 percent ● Should ban or impose fees on plastic bags only - 7 percent ● Support expressed for the carryout bag fee - 6 percent ● City should work with big box retailers and delivery services to reduce waste - 5 percent ● Equity concerns regarding impact on residents with lower incomes - 4 percent ● Concern for impact on businesses; will shop outside of Edina - 3 percent A brief selection of unedited comments in response to the second open-ended question includes: ● “I do not feel the merchant should keep the bag fee, but that it should be donated to a local environmental resource. Put that money back into the city.” ● “If the per bag fee passes, it will only push me further to continue to shop in EP. Being in western Edina it is cheaper for us to shop there (tax levies, bag fees…)” ● “Since we are a first ring suburb, I suggest we adopt a bag ordinance that is the same as the one that Minneapolis has.” ● “Why not just eliminate plastic bags? Why charge for them and put that on the consumer? The stores should be responsible for the waste they create by offering poor choices.” ● “Why include paper bags?” Visitor Responses A total of four responses were received from individuals who indicated they do not live or work in Edina. Note: a total of five responses are included in the attached Visitor Survey Response Report, but one response was a project administrator survey test. The four visitor responses to the abbreviated survey module available to them generally evidenced support for the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, with one dissenting about applying the fee to paper bags and two 8 dissenting about its application to reusable bags. Two responses to the open-ended questions in the abbreviated survey module centered on equity, with respondents wondering if the fee would be assessed to individuals utilizing food assistance programs. Two comments stressed the need for additional education and one supported banning single-use carryout containers/utensils. Virtual Roundtable Discussions Three one-hour, virtual roundtable discussions were scheduled to begin with a brief, educational presentation followed by open discussion with several question prompts. Due to low enrollment, only one virtual roundtable discussion occurred, with a second modified to a one-on-one discussion: ● Business Roundtable, May 5, 7:30 a.m. - canceled due to no enrollment ● Resident Roundtable, May 10, 7 p.m. - two residents participated: ○ Concern about abundance of plastic bags used for carryout/curbside pick up orders, particularly from Target and grocery stores ○ Suggest the City work with these retailers toward reduced bag usage and possible pilot initiative ○ Concern about carryout bag fee burden on small businesses; suggested giving them additional time for compliance ○ Stressed importance of educating small retailers to track and code any bag fees received as ‘other revenue’ for tax reporting purposes ○ Concern about whether a carryout bag fee will shift consumer spending to other nearby communities without similar fees ○ Suggest the City increase recycling and composting ○ Suggest the City “get rid of plastic bags” ● Business and Resident Roundtable, May 11, 11:30 a.m. - one resident registered and participated in one-on-one discussion: ○ “Getting more and more concerned about the processes and excessive taxes.” ○ Concern about the businesses retaining the carryout bag fee revenue: “...could be used for something not environmental…” ○ If the focus is to reduce, then impose a ban, not a fee ○ Sanitation concerns about bag reuse with carryout food ○ Concern with logistics required of businesses: “Will deter economic development. New businesses will look at other communities with less regulations.” ○ Concern over required online survey registration compromising anonymity and questioned whether survey reached all socio-economic sectors of the community One-on-One Business Interviews and Business Survey Module Responses Two outreach methods were used to gain insights from the Edina business community regarding the potential carryout bag fee ordinance. The most successful method of gathering opinions took place during one-on-one conversations with select business representatives. In addition, opinions from five business representatives were gained through responses to a separate online survey module in the Better Together Edina project web page. 9 Business Outreach - Executive Summary Edina businesses largely do not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. The one-on-one conversations with Edina business representatives proved the most productive and effective manner of gaining their insights on the potential ordinance. A few reflections on these conversations include: ● Large retail businesses, both chain and independent, tend to understand the City’s interest in a carryout bag fee to further its sustainability goals, and are ready to gear up for compliance ● Small businesses, particularly upscale, independent retailers, were more likely to oppose the ordinance, citing reporting requirements as one of the main areas of concern. ● Both large and small businesses expressed concern about the impact of ordinance compliance on customer relations ● Small businesses in particular are expecting a robust community outreach and education effort from the City regarding the onset of a carryout bag fee requirement Opinions received from business representatives through the online survey the largely mirrored those heard during the one-on-one interviews, with the exception that four out of the five survey respondents cited preferring a longer lead time of more than 12 months to prepare for compliance by contrast to shorter preferred lead times cited by interviewed business representatives as detailed in Figure 12. The business representatives that participated in the one-on-one interviews were generally appreciative of the opportunity to express their thoughts and concerns about the potential carryout bag fee ordinance and its impact on their operations and customer relations efforts. One-on-One Business Interviews and Business Survey Module Respondent Overview A total of 24 one-on-one conversations were held with Edina business representatives; 21 of these conversations lasted between 20 and 40 minutes and three lasted five to 10 minutes. Five business representatives responded to the online survey module. Businesses and the representatives participating in the one-on-one interviews included: ● Respondent demographics - interviews ○ 16 women ○ Eight men ● Respondent demographics - online survey ○ Unknown ● Respondent position - interviews ○ Two shopping center managers ○ 10 business owners ■ Four minority business owners ○ Nine business managers ○ Four administrators/managers 10 ● Respondent position - online survey ○ Four business owners ○ One business employee ● Business size and longevity in Edina - interviews ○ 15 independent retailers or restaurants ○ Six franchises (one of which included conversations with both local and corporate representatives) ○ Longevity in Edina ranged from one year to nearly 75 years in business ● Business size and longevity in Edina - online survey ○ Two independent retailers or restaurants ○ Two franchises ○ One institution ○ Longevity in Edina ranged from two years to more than 70 years in business ● Business type - interviews ○ 12 retail stores ○ Five restaurants ○ Four include both restaurant and retail ● Business type - online survey ○ Two retail stores ○ Two restaurants ○ One institution A list of all businesses contacted for the one-on-one interviews is attached as Exhibit 4. Of the three very short conversations that took place in addition to the 21 longer interviews, two business representatives said their firm will comply with whatever the City requires and one was strongly opposed to a potential carryout bag fee but did not wish to be interviewed. Managers of two restaurants, one each a franchise and independent, participated in one-on-one interviews and the owners of those restaurants subsequently took the online survey. The online survey data attached as Exhibit 2 is presented anonymously. Amount and Types of Bags Used - Interviews and Online Survey ● Businesses were asked to estimate the type and range of carryout bags distributed monthly (e.g., 1-100, 101-500, 501-1,000, etc.). Bag types included plastic, brown paper, paper bags (not brown), compostable bags, reusable bags (plastic) and reusable bags (cotton or other fabric). Both business representatives who were interviewed and who responded to the survey estimated a wide range on the number of bags distributed each month, from 50 to 150,000. Most of the businesses distribute between 500 and 1,000 per month. 11 A majority of businesses interviewed distribute paper bags, either exclusively or combined. (Figure 7A) Type of Bag or Bags Plastic only Paper only Paper and Plastic Paper and Cloth Plastic and Canvas Canvas or Cloth Bags for Sale Number of Businesses 2 8 6 1 1 3 Independent 6 5 1 1 1 Franchise 2 2 1 2 Figure 7A A majority of businesses responding to the survey also distribute paper bags, either exclusively or combined. (Figure 7B) Type of Bag or Bags Plastic only Paper only Reusable Plastic and Reusable Cloth Paper, Reusable Plastic and Reusable Cloth Number of Businesses 1 2 1 1 Independent 1 1 1 Franchise 1 1 Figure 7B Estimated Seasonal Bag Distribution Increases ● Does your business use more bags than indicated during the holiday months (November-December). Business representatives interviewed expressed a range of percentages by which their bag distribution increases during November and December, ranging from 20 to 75 percent. Of the 13 businesses citing an increase, most estimated 20 or 50 percentage increases, with only two citing a 75 percent increase and only one each for 25 and 30 percent increases. Several retailers noted that their seasonal increases occur at other times during the year, such as around Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day, spring graduation season, etc. (Figure 8) 12 Estimated Seasonal Bag Distribution Increases Type of Business 20 Percent 25 Percent 30 Percent 50 Percent 50 to 75 Percent 75 to 100 Percent Independent 2 1 5 1 Franchise 2 1 (mall) 1 Figure 8 Bag Sources and Costs ● Where do you purchase your business’s carryout bags? Of the retailers that were able to provide information on their bag supplier both during the interviews and in the online survey responses, the sources broke down as follows: (Figure 9) Bag Sources by Business Type Type of Business Local Supplier Domestic but not local Imported Independent 6 8 2 Franchise 2 1 2 Figure 9 Bag costs for both interviewed businesses and survey respondents varied widely, from $0.05 for plastic bags to more than $2.53 for custom, imported paper bags. Of those interviewed who were able to cite bag costs, 11 said they paid less than $1 per bag for both the paper/plastic bags supplied. A total of six cited per-bag costs of $1 or more. Recycling Practices ● Businesses were asked to describe any regular environmental or sustainability activities in which their business currently participates and whether they accept bags of any type for recycling. Nearly all of the businesses indicated that they do some measure of recycling on premises. Most participate in mixed materials recycling, and the larger retailers recycle corrugated cardboard. A total of four businesses, two interviewed and two survey respondents, accept bags back for recycling. None charge customers for this recycling opportunity. The two interviewed businesses include grocery stores (one each independent and franchise) that accept plastic bags for recycling. The plastic bags are taken back by the bag supplier; one grocery outlet indicated the bags are recycled into a lumber composite material. The online survey respondents were both restaurants that accept bags for recycling both distributed only paper bags, one is an independent and the other is a franchise. 13 Following are additional notes on interviewed business recycling and sustainability efforts: ● Four participate in composting (two each independent and franchise) ● Two donate unsold, prepared foods to Second Harvest (one each independent and franchise) ● One donates $0.05 to Second Harvest each time a customer brings a reusable bag (franchise) ● Plastic bags distributed from one independent business are made from recovered ocean plastic waste ● One women’s retail clothing store invites customers to bring back clothing with their label that is no longer wanted or useful; the clothes are shipped to a central location, repurposed as clothing items and returned to the retail outlet for sale at reduced prices (franchise) ● Another donates unsold prepared foods and scraps to a farming operation for hog feed (franchise) ● Two stated that in the past few years, they have trained employees to ask if customers want a bag which has reduced bag distribution (one each independent and franchise) ● In the late fall and winter, a craft store holds gatherings where customers bring in surplus yarn to knit hats, mittens and scarves for distribution through social service organizations (independent) Following are additional notes on recycling and sustainability efforts of businesses responding to the online survey: ● One franchise composts fruit and vegetable waste ● One independent encourages customers to bring bottles of a cleaning product back for a low-cost refill ● One franchise reduces the store temperature during off hours, uses tissue paper sparingly for wrapping and cites a 25 percent reduction in bag use by talking to customers and promoting less bag usage on social media platforms Experience with Carryout Bag Fee Requirements ● Businesses were asked to detail any experience they had with transitioning to and complying with a carryout bag fee requirement in other communities. Three of the interviewed businesses were able to provide information on how they, or a related business, had complied with the carryout bag fee requirement in the City of Minneapolis: ● One independent restaurant manager indicated a sister location in Minneapolis had “no trouble whatsoever” complying with the requirement and that they would react consistently across the company should a requirement go into effect in Edina ● A retail franchise manager who managed a store for the same chain in Minneapolis when the ordinance when into effect offered these insights: ○ Cited no problem with rollout ○ Estimated 90 percent drop in bag usage ○ Staff trained to ask “Do you need a bag today for five cents?” 14 ○ When it was raining, staff just gave the bags without charging on a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ basis ○ Was not aware of a reporting requirement to Minneapolis ● Another retail franchise manager received information from the chain’s Minneapolis store, reporting that: ○ While the chain was prepared to report information regarding carryout bag fees, the City of Minneapolis had not yet requested data ○ Plastic bag usage has gone down and reusable bag sales have increased, but the retail manager did not have specific data to cite for the trend None of the businesses responding to the survey had experience with carryout bag fee requirements; the one affirmative response was part of the site administrator’s test. Support From the City of Edina ● What support would be helpful for the City of Edina to provide to assist with transitioning customers to the new per-bag fee? Business representatives were asked about their interest in/preference for several types of support the City could provide to help with transitioning customers and staff to a carryout bag fee ordinance requirement. The options of providing explanatory signage to post, fact sheets to provide both guidance for staff and information to customers all received similar positive reactions. In response to this question, and at other times in the conversations, eight business representatives spoke to the need for a ‘robust’ education campaign on City’s part. Other comments received on this questions included: ● “It’s all about communication” ● “Anything to take the blame off of the business” ● “Provide messaging on all City platforms” ● “Market appropriately by City so customers know that small businesses don’t have a choice” ● “Most important that clerks aren’t first person to tell customer about the fee” ● “Outreach must say ‘why’ this is happening” ● “Fact sheets should provide the City’s phone number and website details for residents with questions” ● “It would be great if someone from the City could come train onsite employees” Recommended Bag Exemptions ● Certain bags, including those used for prescriptions, produce and dry cleaning are likely to be exempt from the requirements. Are there any other bags that you think should be considered for exemption? Please explain. Interviewed business representatives were asked what types of bags should be exempt, and many of them favored exempting reusable bags. Other suggestions included: 15 ● Any bags for transactions in excess of $1,000 ● Food carryout bags after restaurant check is paid ● Paper and biodegradable bags ● Small bags for jewelry and other small purchases ● Wax bags for soup containers In response to this question, online survey respondents suggested exempting: ● Food carryout bags, both for customer pick-up and third-party delivery services ● Reusable bags and gift bags Tracking and Reporting Preferences ● Businesses will likely be required to track and report information on bag distribution and purchasing changes. What information would be most useful for you to track the impact of the new requirement? Business representatives interviewed had strong opinions on potential tracking and reporting requirements to gauge the impact of a carryout bag fee. Approximately half of the business representatives said they understood the need for reporting, and equally preferred reporting fee revenues and/or the number of bags purchased and distributed annually. One corporate representative said they were unaware of any reporting requirements in other cities and locations with bag fee ordinances in effect. While most larger businesses understood the need for reporting, six small retailers took great exception and consistently expressed that this would just add another ‘stressor’ to small businesses. One said that reporting was the biggest ‘friction’ for them and would be very difficult. Another said they already do so much reporting and this would just be another burden without any benefit to them. One business owner said, “Reporting will be difficult and we will never do a good job.” Business representatives responding to the online survey had similar strong opinions. One each independent and franchise business representatives indicated they would be willing to report the number of and type of bags purchased annually. The other three, including two independent and one franchise, said they would not comply as quoted: ● “Uninterested” ● “None. We always ask clients if they want a bag or not, and most, who are being environmentally conscious say no.” ● “None of the above information will change how I conduct my business nor impact it.” Carryout Bag Fee Revenue Utilization ● Please detail any initial thoughts on how your business will use the bag fee revenues. A majority of the interviewed business representatives said they expected they would simply utilize the revenue to support continued business operations. A few indicated they would likely use the revenue to purchase more bags, and two said they might donate the fees to charity. 16 One corporate representative said they were unaware of other jurisdictions with similar ordinances in which the retailer retained the revenue. Another merchant noted that the fees would not be considered as revenue. Utilizing correct accounting for carryout bag fee revenues also was referenced in the May 10 virtual roundtable discussion. Of the online survey respondents who answered this question, one cited it as a ‘nuisance tax’ that they would not assess, one said they would use fee revenue to cover the point-of-sale system retrofit cost and another said they were not sure how they would use the revenue. Possible Customer Refund or Credit ● Would your business give a credit or refund to customers bringing their own bag or bags? Business representatives were asked if they would consider giving a credit or refund to customers bringing their own bag or bags. Of the online survey responses, four said no and one franchise business representative said it would be up to the corporate system. A number of interviewed merchants had no opinions on this, but approximately 10 of those interviewed said ‘yes’ or ‘maybe’, with only one indicating they absolutely would not do so. A few other comments and notes include: ● One merchant gives a $5 to $12 credit for a future purchase to customers bringing their own bag or bags; the variable credit depends on the initial purchase amount ● One specialty retail store owner said they did not want to encourage customers to bring their own bags, as their imported, branded bags are an important component of their marketing efforts Support for Required or Voluntary Carryout Bag Fee ● Are you in favor of a required bag fee? ● Are you in favor of a voluntary bag fee? Businesses could volunteer to implement a bag fee rather than being required by the City. Overall, both business representatives who were interviewed and those who chose to respond to the online survey were not in favor of a required or voluntary carryout bag fee, as illustrated: (Figure 10) Support for a Required or Voluntary Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance Carryout Bag Fee Yes No Neutral/No Opinion Plastic Bags Only Required 3 16 7 1 Voluntary 8 11 10 Figure 10 17 Additional comments on a required carryout bag fee include: ● “We are in the middle on this. We are a Green Business but are very concerned how it’s communicated to the community so it’s not punitive. It shouldn’t be done at the expense of small business; it will be hard for small business, easier for large business.” ● “We do have to think about alternate ways to get products home.” ● “I’m in favor of getting things out of the landfill. This could be important for retail users of many bags per week, per year, such as a grocery store.” ● “Super embarrassing to charge for a bag when a customer is making a $500 jeans purchase. We are not a grocery store.” ● “We take pride in being generous with our customers, and this seems tacky, chintzy.” ● “Not all businesses are the same.” ● “This is a lose/lose situation; customers will view it as a tax and will think businesses are asking for the program.” ● “People are concerned about fees. It will help the environment but people don’t want to pay extra money.” ● “I understand the purpose, but am concerned customers will be annoyed.” ● “This will be difficult to implement fairly.” ● “Paper can be recycled.” ● “I invest in my bags and don’t want to push people away from using them.” Relative to a possible voluntary fee, those who opposed it generally expressed concern over lack of consistency or a “level playing field” among businesses. One said, “A voluntary fee is just a stepping stone to a requirement.” Compliance Concerns ● The online survey module asked businesses to rank various aspects of compliance from easy to difficult: (Figure 11) Compliance Issues Ratings by Business Type Compliance Issue Very Difficult Somewhat Difficult Neutral Easy N/A Employee Training 1 (Independent) 1 (Chain) 1 (Chain) 1 (Independent) 1 (Independent) Systems Update 3 (1 Chain, 2 Independent) 2 (1 Chain, 1 Independent) Cost 1 (Independent) 1 (Chain) 2 (1 Chain, 1 Independent) Customer Relations 4 (1 Chain, 3 Independent) 1 (Chain) Figure 11 18 Expected Impact of a Required Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance ● What do you expect will be the impact of a required fee? During the interviews, business representatives expressed a variety of strong opinions about their expectations on how a required carryout bag fee would impact their business. (Figure 12) Expected Impact of a Required Carryout Bag Fee Ordinance by Business Type Type of Business Communication Concerns Concerns About Customer Relations Expect Easy Customers Acceptance and Compliance Independent 5 7 5 Franchise 3 (one mall) 3 Figure 12 Specific comments from business representatives include: ● “There will be a few complainers and then people will get used to it.” ● “This will aggravate consumers who are tired of being nickel and dimed.” ● “This will be harder with high-end purchases, but I expect a mixed bag on how people feel about it.” ● “There will be less bag usage and customers will understand.” ● “I will have to add a process to track this for little value.” ● “I fear that it’s not a state-wide standard and customers will shop in another town without a bag fee. We could lose business.” ● I’m concerned that customers will take out their frustrations on employees. We hire people of all abilities and some might not be able to handle customer frustration.” ● “Most people will support it and it will be a non-issue after the initial adjustment.” ● “I don’t think this will impact consumer behavior.” ● “People won’t freak out, but this will take time for staff to explain and they have limited time when we are in a rush.” ● “No one will want bags anymore. The change was remarkable at the Minneapolis location.” ● “Customers will balk, and staff will not support the fee to avoid conflict.” ● “If there is great communication, it will temper concerns. I don’t expect pushback across all customers. Great marketing is needed.” ● “There will be a good impact. Ultimately, customers will come with their own bags and maybe we will have reusable bags for purchase.” ● “We will lose customers, and this will not be well received by new customers.” ● “People won’t mind, but I’m worried about how to incorporate this fee with the frequent DoorDash and Uber Eats orders.” ● “Seniors won’t like it and will be upset.” ● “There will be a certain amount of reduction of plastic bags, but I’m not sure about the impact if applied to paper bags.” 19 Preferred Amount of Lead Time for Ordinance Compliance ● If a required carryout bag fee is approved, what amount of lead time would your business need to prepare for implementation? As with the online business survey module, business representatives were asked about the amount of time they would need to modify operations for ordinance compliance. Their responses are summarized as follows: (Figure 13) Preferred Amount of Lead Time for Ordinance Compliance by Business Type Amount of Lead Time Less than 30 days 30 days 30 to 45 days 60 days 90 days 120 days + Did Not Respond Number of Businesses 5 6 1 2 6 4 5 Independent 3 5 1 1 3 3 Franchise 2 1 1 3 1 Figure 13 One interviewed business owner commented, “It should be easy if the City provides explanations and resources.” Reusable Bag Exchange Interest ● For businesses offering online order and/or curbside delivery, would you consider or be open to implementing a reusable bag exchange program? During the interviews, one franchise business representative expressed interest in a reusable bag exchange, with one independent saying they might be interested but noted that customers might be concerned about sanitation. Sanitation concerns were echoed by one independent business representative who said they would not be interested in a reusable bag exchange program. The remainder of the business representatives interviewed were not interested or the question did not apply. None of the businesses that responded to the online survey were interested in a bag exchange program. Preferred City Communication Method ● How do you prefer to learn about and stay in-the-know about related City of Edina policies and their associated processes? In response to a variety of possible City communications outreach methods to provide businesses with information on the potential carryout bag fee ordinance, business representatives interviewed and those who responded to the survey expressed the following preferences: (Figure 14) 20 Preferred City Communications Method by Business Type Type of Business In-Person Meeting Virtual Meeting Through a Business Group Print Newsletter E-Newsletter Business- Specific Website Franchise 2 3 3 7 7 4 Independent 6 6 11 15 7 Total 2 9 9 18 22 11 Figure 14 One business representative added that they are only interested in attending a meeting if feedback will truly be considered. During the interviews, three independent business representatives noted that electronic communications are preferred for sustainability reasons, one saying “due to the spirit of the initiative.” One independent business representative said, “Edina does a good job with emails.” Additional Comments ● How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? ● What other questions do you have about this proposal? At the conclusion of the interview, business representatives were asked for any final or additional thoughts: ● “I appreciate the explanation and don’t have issues. Business owners want to work with the City and protect the environment. We need information to show customers to help explain. I think customers will understand and it will be easy.” ● “It feels like you’re swimming upstream with some of these things. It doesn’t make sense for our business. We will likely eat the fee or just comp it.” ● “Use this only for [businesses] who use multiple plastic bags per purchase on a daily basis.” ● “The City of Edina missed the mark on this, as it’s a very difficult time for businesses with state consideration of paid family leave, sick and safe time and other multiple taxes.” ● “We didn’t know until a recent health inspection about the City ordinance requiring recycling utensils, no black plastics, etc.” 21 ● “I am very perplexed by this initiative. I recognize the importance of reducing landfill waste. This is a lot of work for retailers to track. It’s been a tough year for retailers and this will make it tougher. Has it been a roaring success in Minneapolis?” ● “We will adapt.” ● “The City should approach small businesses separately and provide subsidies. The parking requirement is too strict for small businesses; it’s the same for Target. Use common sense. Incentivize sustainability for small businesses.” ● “Offer tax incentives or rebates for businesses that use reusable or compostable bags.” ● “Overall education and PSAs like they did in the 70s when I was growing up.” ● “Grocery/product packaging and Amazon boxes are a greater problem than bags that get reused.” ● “Ban straws.” ● “No other questions but our customers we’ve been talking to about this since January don’t like it and think it’s just another tax.” ● “A charge for paper bags would discourage recycling because it creates a cost to comply where there is no higher price to throw recycling items in the trash.” ● “I use reusable bags all the time but not for food service. It’s just not sanitary.” Final Summary Residents In general, Edina residents responding to the online survey don’t support a required carryout bag fee, with some support for a voluntary carryout bag fee. Of the three residents who participated in the virtual roundtable discussions, two were generally in favor but had specific questions, and one was opposed. Clearly, the online survey was the most effective method of eliciting opinions from Edina residents. Businesses Edina businesses that both responded to the survey and participated in the one-on-one interviews largely do not support implementation of a carryout bag fee. The one-on-one conversations with Edina business representatives proved the most productive and effective manner of gaining their insights on the potential ordinance. A few reflections on these conversations and the survey responses include: ● During the interviews, large retail businesses, both chain and independent, tend to understand the City’s interest in a carryout bag fee to further its sustainability goals, and are ready to gear up for compliance. The chains responding to the online survey did not express similar understanding and willingness to comply. ● Small businesses, particularly upscale, independent retailers, were more likely to oppose the ordinance, citing reporting requirements as one of the main areas of concern. This was echoed in both the interviews and survey responses. ● Both large and small businesses expressed concern about the impact of ordinance compliance on customer relations, again, this was echoed during both outreach methods. ● Small businesses in particular are expecting a robust community outreach and education effort from the City regarding the onset of a carryout bag fee requirement. 22 The business representatives were generally appreciative of the opportunity to express their thoughts and concerns about the potential carryout bag fee ordinance and its impact on their operations and customer relations efforts. In Conclusion While Edina residents are somewhat split on their support of a carryout bag fee, businesses tend to oppose the initiative. Extensive community education and outreach, as well as support to Edina businesses - particularly small businesses - will prove essential to successful implementation should the carryout bag fee ordinance receive approval. Special thanks to City of Edina staff Sustainability Manager Grace Hancock, Economic Development Manager Bill Neuendorf, Edina Police Department Community Engagement Officer Emily Jepson and Community Liaison Lulu Thompson as well as Edina Chamber of Commerce Vice-President Shelly Loberg, Galleria General Manager Wendy Eisenberg and Southdale Center General Manager Judy Tullius for their efforts to identify and provide contacts for the businesses interviewed during this process. Exhibit 1 Edina Resident Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey Summary (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 13 April 2023 - 16 May 2023 PROJECT NAME: Carryout Bag Ordinance FILTER BY: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) Answered : I-am-a-resident SURVEY QUESTIONS (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 1 of 55 Q1 Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) 201 (100.0%) 201 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) I am a resident I own or work at a business in Edina I am not a resident or affiliated with a business in Edina Question options Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 2 of 55 Q22 Are you in favor of a required bag fee? 4 (80.0%) 4 (80.0%) 1 (20.0%) 1 (20.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) No Other (please specify)Yes Question options Mandatory Question (5 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 3 of 55 Q23 Are you in favor of a voluntary bag fee? Businesses could volunteer to implement a bag fee, rather than being required by the City. 1 (20.0%) 1 (20.0%) 2 (40.0%) 2 (40.0%) 2 (40.0%) 2 (40.0%) Other (please specify)No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (5 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 4 of 55 Q24 How often do you reuse carryout bags, if at all? Examples include: plastic bags for trash liners, paper bags for recycling, etc. Never Rarely Sometimes Very often Always Question options 50 100 150 200 250 Plastic bags Brown paper bags Paper bags (not brown) Compostable bags Reusable bags (plastic) Reusable bags (cotton or other fabric) 59 95 35 50 45 56 59 60 38 17 50 46 44 27 44 48 45 43 27 17 47 27 31 30 12 2 37 59 30 26 Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 5 of 55 Q24 How often do you reuse carryout bags, if at all? Examples include: plastic bags for trash liners, paper bags for recycling, etc. Always : 59 Very often : 59 Sometimes : 44 Rarely : 27 Never : 12 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 6 of 55 (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 7 of 55 Always : 95 Very often : 60 Sometimes : 27 Rarely : 17 Never : 2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Brown paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 8 of 55 Always : 35 Very often : 38 Sometimes : 44 Rarely : 47 Never : 37 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Paper bags (not brown) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 9 of 55 Always : 50 Very often : 17 Sometimes : 48 Rarely : 27 Never : 59 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 10 of 55 Always : 45 Very often : 50 Sometimes : 45 Rarely : 31 Never : 30 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 Reusable bags (plastic) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 11 of 55 Always : 56 Very often : 46 Sometimes : 43 Rarely : 30 Never : 26 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 Reusable bags (cotton or other fabric) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 12 of 55 Q25 For what kind of trips do you use reusable bags? Check all that apply. Other (please specify)Shopping at multiple stores like a shopping mall or shopping district (e.g. 50th and France) Errands to larger stores like Target Errands to smaller stores like pharmacy trips, corner stores, etc. Grocery store trips I do not use reusable bags. Question options 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 38 122 69 73 51 32 Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Checkbox Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 13 of 55 Q26 What per-bag fee level would stop you from purchasing a carryout bag? 54 (26.9%) 54 (26.9%) 40 (19.9%) 40 (19.9%) 27 (13.4%) 27 (13.4%) 33 (16.4%) 33 (16.4%) 47 (23.4%) 47 (23.4%) $1.00 $0.25 $0.10 $0.05 $0.01 Question options Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 14 of 55 Q27 Are you in favor of requiring that paper bags be certified as coming from sustainable sources like Forestry Stewardship Council, or from recycled materials? 13 (6.5%) 13 (6.5%) 19 (9.5%) 19 (9.5%) 81 (40.3%) 81 (40.3%) 83 (41.3%) 83 (41.3%) 5 (2.5%) 5 (2.5%) Other (please specify)No Yes, either one Yes, from recycled materials Yes, Forestry Stewardship Council Question options Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 15 of 55 Q28 Would you prefer to shop at businesses that provide a credit or rebate for customers bringing their own bag or bags? 113 (56.2%) 113 (56.2%) 76 (37.8%) 76 (37.8%) 12 (6.0%) 12 (6.0%) Other (please specify)No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 16 of 55 Q29 Would you be willing to participate in a reusable bag supply or exchange program? See Bull City Boomerang Bag example. 73 (36.3%) 73 (36.3%) 128 (63.7%) 128 (63.7%) No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 17 of 55 Q30 Please rank the following options from most to least preferable. Q31 How can the City help you prepare if an ordinance is passed that requires merchants to charge customers a fee per carryout bag? Please rank these items in order of most to least helpful. OPTIONS AVG. RANK No carryout bag fee is implemented.1.74 A carryout bag fee is implemented that merchants can participate in voluntarily. 2.04 A carryout bag fee is implemented where all merchants are required to charge customers per carryout bag 2.22 OPTIONS AVG. RANK signage at stores I frequent, like grocery stores and malls 1.94 Receive a free reusable bag from the City 2.61 Receive a postcard in the mail notifying me that this change is coming 2.61 City presence at events I'm already attending, to share information on the coming change 3.44 City offer a standalone event to inform residents of the coming change, that I can attend 4.40 Mandatory Question (196 response(s)) Question type: Ranking Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident Mandatory Question (183 response(s)) Question type: Ranking Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 18 of 55 Q32 How do you prefer to learn about and stay in-the-know about related City of Edina policies and their associated processes? Please check all that apply Other (please specify)Targeted, issue-specific postcard mailings BetterTogetherEdina website City e-newsletters Monthly City newsletter Question options 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 114 117 43 77 29 Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Checkbox Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 19 of 55 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. I don't know enough to answer Maybe No Yes Question options 50 100 150 200 250 plastic bags paper bags compostable bags reusable bags 96 50 29 50 88 132 146 129 15 18 19 15 2 1 7 7 Mandatory Question (201 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 20 of 55 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 21 of 55 Yes : 96 No : 88 Maybe : 15 I don't know enough to answer : 2 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 22 of 55 Yes : 50 No : 132 Maybe : 18 I don't know enough to answer : 1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 23 of 55 Yes : 29 No : 146 Maybe : 19 I don't know enough to answer : 7 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 24 of 55 Yes : 50 No : 129 Maybe : 15 I don't know enough to answer : 7 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 reusable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 25 of 55 4/14/2023 01:55 PM Encourage/incentivize businesses to adopt Skip the Stuff policies; provide more resources to enforce ordinances, like Green-to-Go packaging; require that existing and new multi-family buildings provide easy, equitable access to organics recycling; promote and educate residents and businesses about second-hand use and gifting groups and habits (ways to think about less consumption); adhere to the goal of set out in the CAP of eliminating single-use plastics by 2025. 4/14/2023 02:16 PM Test comment 4/14/2023 06:38 PM Get every single EPS school building to properly recycle and compost. More enforcement of the compostable food carry out container rule. Get businesses (especially the larger businesses, including grocery store chains) to properly recycle and produce less waste. AM No more plastic take out containers. Compostable utensils and straws. 53 PM More places/ways to recycle plastic bags - dropoffs or collections. I hear people all the time say they'd love to have weekly recycling. Our bins are always full. Now that I do organics, I could totally have garbage pickup every other week (I know garbage isn't you). 4/17/2023 12:57 PM A California relative visiting us was shocked at the waste Edinans have at the curb. What is CA doing? (Simi Valley) How can businesses be a part of this? How can contributing to the better good be a part of this? It's got to be more than fees (external motivation). Please think big picture. I have a light-weight yet strong reusable bag that folds to about 1.5" x 3" and since I easily carry it with me it's solved my problems of forgetting bags when shopping. I always have it, and it has changed my habit (internal motivation). What if Edinan's adopted that practice? 4/17/2023 02:48 PM Require multi-unit buildings to do organic recycling. Q35 How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 26 of 55 4/17/2023 05:58 PM Require bags and containers to be easily recyclable or compostible, and clearly marked as such 4/19/2023 07:56 AM Continue to allow paper and plastic bags without a fee. We use the paper bags for recycling and the plastic bags for household needs. New law would make us simply buy bags. 4/19/2023 08:00 AM More education about reusable options. Many residents in Edina do no like to be "forced" to do these things, they feel it's government overreach. I do think it's important to have sustainability goals and protect the environment, we just have to think of ways to encourage that behaviors versus mandating the behavior. 4/20/2023 09:10 AM Make composting available to multi-family housing. PM Get rid of the plastic bags, go with paper; recyclable or compostable. Don't charge for bags! Encourage businesses to not overpackage goods. Encourage residents to bring their own leftover containers to local restaurants 4/21/2023 05:46 PM nothing - recycle and garbage is adequate 4/21/2023 07:26 PM Is there a way businesses can turn off more lights when staff/ customers are not in the buildings? 4/22/2023 08:58 AM Offer plastic/film recycling pickup from residential homes. Similar to Ridwell’s program. 4/22/2023 01:15 PM Banning plastic bags 4/22/2023 03:56 PM Government over step on the bag issue. People create waste. Taxing bags is not the answer. 1. Move recycling to weekly pickup instead of every other week. 2. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 27 of 55 4/23/2023 08:39 AM Open a drop off site for recycling and organics so that its local vs having to go to a Hennepin county facility, which is an additional burden on a consumer so they may not take the time to do that instead just put it in their trash and not recycle or put in organics....problem is many people have more recycling (largely due to Amazon and other ecom shipping boxes) than they can fit in one container for every two weeks and so end putting the extra in the trash as its too much of a hassle to drive it to Hennepin county facility - see it all over the city. 3. Educate residents about recycling - that its not really all that good - its more of a 'feel good' thing, but reducing and reusing is far more beneficial. Residents have a misperception that recycling is a very positive thing, so they have no problem using more and pushing more in recycling when in reality its not as good as they think. (e.g., someone goes and buys a case of plastic water bottles thinking, oh, this is good because I can just put them in recycling, when in reality the best thing to do would have been to obtain clean water somewhere else or put a water filtration system in at home and use a reusable container vs, getting plastic water bottles. Recycling really doesn't have much benefit in comparison to reducing and reusing. Most people don't understand that. This is a good article to refer to or to publish to educate people in Edina further about reducing and reusing vs. recycling: "Recycling Isn’t Virtuous; It’s Making Things Worse. On Earth Day and beyond, focus on reducing and reusing, not recycling" https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral- boundaries/202304/recycling-isnt-virtuous-its-making-things-worse 4/23/2023 11:59 AM reward people for using their own bags as well as no longer allowing plastic bags as an option. Since curbside recycling doesn't allow plastic bags to be turned in, a separate trip has to be made to continually drop off the collecting plastic bags. Target uses MANY plastic bags for grocery pick up- one for each different department shopped! If the merchant isn't allowed to have them, people won't use them. Don't always pass the buck to the consumer to cover costs - it's SO tiring when it keeps happening in every area. 4/23/2023 06:30 PM Work with retailers on charging THEM fees for not using paper/compostable/reusable bags. This cost should NOT shift to the consumer--that's the last thing consumers and this economy needs and all the inflation that has occurred. 4/24/2023 06:11 AM Dedicate time, money, and resources to find innovative ways to reduce waste rather than simply charging residents more money for everyday activities. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 28 of 55 07:35 AM Focus on business waste, and not passing it on the end-user. 4/24/2023 07:38 AM Ask merchants to provide more food in bulk quantities, or packaging that is less wasteful. Instead of a plastic bag for apples, why not a cardboard box? Some of Costco's suppliers do it that way. AM Borrow bag program would be a significant improvement for the movement. Too easy to forget your bag and having an option to borrow something will see a big jump in participation. Plastic bags should have larger fees than paper. 4/24/2023 08:32 PM Just tell the people and ask them. Why does government need to be in everything? Why over reach in this area. Of everything presented, the most favorable is the ring your own bag and get an instant store credit option. I would much rather see that then the city’s hands in everything. 4/25/2023 04:20 PM Stop managing things. As soon as something is mandated it makes me not want to do it. I’da bath charge is implemented, I’ I’ll simply shop in other suburbs. That will take taxes away from Edina and increase the number of miles I drive every day. Partner with Edina Public School - esp lunchroom practices. Recycling and Compost bins next to all public trash cans - with labeling and examples. People are not good at knowing what goes where, which often defeats the purpose. 31 PM Moved from CT/NY where all plastic bags were banned and there was a fee for paper ones. Took a couple weeks to get used to, but it worked! Support banning plastic fully 100%. 4/26/2023 10:28 AM Government should stay out of private businesses. All they do is add layers of costly regulation and costly government jobs and government is to big all ready ....... like President Reagan said "Government is the problem" 4/26/2023 10:35 AM Ensure merchants don’t require customer to use a bag at all. Use boxes the store is already discarding. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 29 of 55 01 AM If everyone recycles and composts, they would have little trash each week and it would be dry so the brown paper shopping bags could be used instead of plastic garbage bags. 4/26/2023 02:08 PM allow recycling of plastic bags at the curb 4/26/2023 04:29 PM Offer plastic bag and battery recycling with bi monthly recycling pickup without charging anymore fees. 4/26/2023 06:28 PM Ban single use plastic. Impossible dream, I know…. 4/27/2023 04:56 AM Encouraging residents to reuse, but not requiring and adding another fee to everything. 4/27/2023 05:08 AM Leave residents alone instead of borrowing unhelpful ordinances from our neighbor cities that are so poorly mismanaged. 4/27/2023 07:48 AM Require composting and recycling 4/27/2023 07:53 AM I'd love to see data about how much waste we are producing with specific and scientific goals of what it means to reduce waste. Are reusable bags always clean and don't contribute to preventable diseases by using a clean bag every time? When it is time to dispose of a reusable bag do they disintegrate or sit in a landfill without breaking down? 4/27/2023 10:55 AM Educating the people about the importance of these changes and how they will benefit from them. The ordinance could be promoted by having volunteers in grocery stores around the city, which I believe are the main vendor distributing carryout bags, and talking about the impacts of carryout bags and the benefits of reusable ones. Also a strategy has to be develop together with the different merchants (Target, Cub, Lunds, etc.) that can help in the promotion of the reusable bags. 4/27/2023 12:28 PM Multi unit housing and retail recycling/compost programs Discontinue unnecessary mailings ie quarterly newsletter with dated messaging. Continue efforts to reduce food and compost in all schools and (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 30 of 55 hospitals. Measure/dashboard for goals agains actions. Latest clothing swap was a good communication example of telling, executing and reporting results and results against last year. (Go Twila!) 4/27/2023 12:43 PM To me, it is ridiculous to charge for bags. We recycle all of the above and now are going to be penalized and inconvenienced because some can't/won't. Where's the incentive? People who don't recycle now, will just pay the fee. People who do recycle have to pay the fee as well.. 4/27/2023 12:58 PM weekly recycling option or place to drop off overage. We fill our recycling each week b/c we get the paper and recycle everything we can. When we are out of town on a recycling week, no way can we fit 4 weeks of recycling into one bin 4/27/2023 02:03 PM Consolidate w/one garbage hauler to minimize truck traffic/damage/noise, and who would make garbage and recycling pick-up consistent throughout the city. Enforce or make stricter the rules for carryout food containers. Provide education at POS about reducing waste (e.g. bananas don't need to go into a plastic bag). 4/27/2023 03:32 PM Recycling every week versus every other week 4/27/2023 03:33 PM Stop the baloney this is a waste of time and effort 4/27/2023 04:13 PM school district wide student focused education/ habit building campaign (habits are built at a young age; kids are better at separating trash) levy greater fees on construction waste 4/27/2023 05:00 PM Don’t send out postcards related to this. Spread word digitally and in normal city correspondence. Encourage composting. 4/27/2023 10:48 PM Stop wasting money on this for instance. It's not the city's place to tell people what shopping bags to use. It's even worse that the arbitrary fee would be kept by the business, which is just the city implementing corporate welfare. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 31 of 55 4/28/2023 06:06 AM More comprehensive recycling program that includes a broader range of plastics and also fabric/textiles. Or offer quarterly recycling events for items like these. 4/28/2023 08:39 AM The city of Edina should remove themselves from making decisions for business owners and residents in Edina. Feel free to offer information on reducing waste but stay out of the business and personal choices of others. 4/28/2023 08:43 AM Let us decide for ourselves what we want to use. 4/28/2023 01:35 PM I always bring a reusable bag whereever I go and often hear people say, Oh I have one in my car, I forgot it! I think we need to start charging for singly use bags so people get in the habit of bringing their own bags. I have many and don't need anymore. This is a great initiative for the community. 4/28/2023 02:47 PM Who decided that this was a problem that needed fixing? We have weekly trash and compost waste collection, fortnightly recycling collection. If I look in those three bins, bags make up about 1% of my waste. The majority of my waste is food packaging, including paper containers, cans, glass jars, meat dept trays and wrappers, dairy product containers, etc. Bags make an insignificant amount of waste. 4/28/2023 08:37 PM support a recycled bag program 4/28/2023 09:10 PM If you give merchants the option to keep all the money and do what they want, they're going to choose the cheapest option for them. I strongly suggest you look into how Washington State is tackling this issue. We just got back from a trip to Seattle and its suburbs. No single use plastic bags are allowed. Merchants can charge 8 cents for 2 types of bags: large paper bags made with at least 40% recycled content, and/or thick reusable plastic carryout bags made with 40% recycled content and a minimum of 2.2mm thick film. In addition merchants have the OPTION to charge for a compostable plastic green or brown bag. For more information, the website for this policy is here https://ecology.wa.gov/Waste-Toxics/Reducing-recycling- waste/Waste-reduction-programs/Plastics/Plastic-bag-ban If you remember the Target plastic grocery bags from before the pandemic, those are the ones being used now in Seattle, Issaquah, Bellevue. They are good quality bags. Similarly, in Calgary, Canada, bags are (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 32 of 55 15 Canadian cents, which is about 5 American cents. Those bags must be regular plastic that can be used several times. Calgary Co- Op grocery stores did something more brilliant: their grocery bags are also compostable. They're like the green compost bags. For more information about those bags, you can see them and their specifications on Co-Op's website here: https://www.calgarycoop.com/community/here-for-our-planet/what- you-can-do/frequently-asked-questions/ 4/29/2023 08:54 AM The intention behind this program is good, but what the city is proposing will, in effect, be a drop in the bucket for total energy and material waste and the effect on the environment. Bag fees have produced mixed results at other communities around the country (see: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/13/world/reusable-grocery-bags- cotton-plastic-scn/index.html ). Also I really don't want to carry a collection of containers or bags when I do bulk shopping. The city should give stores a deposit/return option. Instead of the fee, merchants would charge a refundable deposit for durable, reusable containers that customers can return at their convenience. This would keep the containers out of the environment while being less expensive and easier for customers and residents of Edina. 4/29/2023 08:56 AM Require or incentivize restaurant carry out to use compostable containers. Coconut Thai is a decent example. I would pay a small fee if it were a choice I could make when placing my order. 4/29/2023 09:14 AM Don’t charge for paper grocery bags. We use them all the time in our kitchen for recycling and compost. Charge for plastic or even better ban plastic 4/29/2023 11:33 AM More easily accessible places to recycle. If you do plan a bag fee, MOST or ALL of that fee should go towards education about reducing waste, not to businesses. 4/29/2023 11:56 AM Find other solutions, such as a better recycling program with broader incorporation of products 4/29/2023 01:36 PM I see no need to have plastic bags in stores! I take any I receive back to the stores for recycling but I feel that a lot of people just toss them since they can't go in the home recycling bin. Only paper bags should be offered at stores as they can be recycled. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 33 of 55 4/29/2023 01:56 PM Cut back in personnel especially in schools, eliminate any and all spending not related to security and roads. Implement fees on one-time use shipping packages used by online retailers such as Amazon. 4/29/2023 05:33 PM Give a credit to people who bring their own bags rather than a tax to those who don't? 4/30/2023 05:26 AM If you want to reduce the plastic waste, ban the plastic bags and don't put this burden on the businesses to monitor a bag fee. 4/30/2023 06:39 AM Please stop trying to micromanage us. We sold our house in linden hills and moved to Edina because we were so tired of all the virtue signaling being crammed down our throats over there and now you are trying to turn Edina into that place. Please stop. 4/30/2023 08:44 AM Reward people for bringing their own bags rather than increasing the cost on everyone. 4/30/2023 01:15 PM Options to recycle plastic bags. 4/30/2023 08:29 PM Let residents and businesses make their own decisions around waste. We are adults who can decide for ourselves. 5/01/2023 05:33 AM Prohibit restaurants from using styrofoam take-out containers 5/01/2023 03:15 PM Based on my street, I'd like to see higher participation in using the biodegradable bins and improved use of recycle bins (most people are putting too much non-recyclable materials in recycling). Encourage businesses to use paper rather than plastic bags. Tell merchants to get rid of all plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 34 of 55 5/02/2023 05:18 AM Ban all single use plastic. Add a deposit fee to plastic beverage bottles similar to glass bottles in 70s 5/02/2023 07:38 AM Instead of adding a fee, prompt merchants to provide a discount for customers who bring a reusable bag, like Target already does. 5/02/2023 08:52 AM Work with Galleria mall in Edina to install recycling bins throughout and outside the mall, that the public can use. Currently there are only trash cans, a very outmoded concept. Another bad location is the row of shops that adjoins the L&B store on W 50th St. An Edina Liquors is in the row. Recycling and trash bins outside the shops would be a great addition (Starbucks, Breadsmith, etc.) since the shops put out tables/chairs in the warm months, yet there's nowhere to put recycling or trash. 5/02/2023 02:07 PM You waste a lot of tax revenue with initiatives such as this. Stop half of what you're doing to stop wasting our money. :18 PM make fruits and veggie containers compostable/ ban plastic water bottles/straws, give rewards for stainable living, ie: coupons at stores 5/02/2023 02:22 PM Stop being paternalistic and let people decide for themselves what to do. :40 PM Ban plastic bags or charge a fee for them. They are the most harmful. 5/02/2023 07:03 PM Reward innovative storm water absorbing landscaping techniques when installed. Promote these practices. Promote rain barrel usage and alternates to lawn landscaping 5/02/2023 08:05 PM Educate residents how to reuse/repurpose the bags they already receive. 5/03/2023 04:26 AM Make sure the new proposal passes this time. There are much more meaningful ways to reduce waste and fight (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 35 of 55 5/03/2023 05:05 AM climate change. This is a feel good measure that doesn't make that much of a difference. I already reuse or bring my own bags whenever I can. The fee just goes to the stores to use however they like. Think about not removing so many trees and finding real solutions. 06:33 AM Ban plastic bags and just charge for paper bags, there is no good use of plastic even for a feww 5/03/2023 07:19 AM The fee collected for the bag fee should be used for further green initiatives. It could be used to continue recycling and composting education and efforts. Grocery stores could use the fee collected to invest in buying compostable produce bags that Edina residents can compost in their compost bins. 5/03/2023 10:06 AM It seems best that the city encourage businesses to use the best possible recycled or efficient bags. Some incentive for businesses. A continued campaign for residents to use their own bags, but not required. 5/03/2023 08:18 PM Hard to say. Maybe stop packing so many people into apartment buildings. High density living generates a lot of waste. I'm pretty sure the two or three grocery bags I use each week isn't going to make a difference in the overall waste in the city. So increasing my grocery bill will do nothing to change the waste issue and will only increase my frustration at the grocery store where prices are already outrageous. Seems like there is a lot of construction waste building so many apartment buildings. Maybe cut down on those! 5/03/2023 09:14 PM Please ban stryofoam and non-compostable or non-recyclable takeout containers! 5/04/2023 06:48 AM Re-inform the citizens about the ease and benefits of composting, have inexpensive under the counter containers for sale. 5/05/2023 07:03 PM Stop building apartment buildings. 5/07/2023 07:35 AM Fees on paper bags are not a good way to reduce waste. The vast majority of brown paper bags are made from recycled material. A ban on plastic bags is the only effective tool. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 36 of 55 5/07/2023 09:34 AM Ban all single use plastic in Edina. 5/09/2023 07:25 AM I think instead it pays if merchants give credit for bringing your own bag like Target or Lakewinds coop. I'm sorry I sometimes forget to bring mine but then I always go with paper and never with plastic. 5/09/2023 09:46 AM Provide reusable bags to lower income residents who may be concerned about having to pay for bags at grocery stores. Create a donation/drop-off/pickup for reusable bags (I know I have plenty I’d be happy to donate). 5/09/2023 09:57 AM Have fewer employees at the city hall…I understand plastic bags being an issue and if you want to make them have to be recyclable that would be fine. Or make all bags have to be paper. But getting rid of it makes no sense, and have no idea what a nickel or penny or dime a bag does if you are not using it for recycle purposes. What point is it to give that money to the store? I think this should be handled at the state level, why do we need people working for Edina doing involved in this. Why have redundancy of community after community doing this..it makes no fiscal or logical sense. 5/09/2023 10:13 AM Fix roads that cause auto damage. Soften water at the city level (Richfield does it and reduces salt in water. Stop doing stupid surveys that you likely won’t listen to. As it seems you have decided to tax us once again AM offer a discount if you bring your own bag. 5/09/2023 11:03 AM We have moved from Hawaii in which all bags except reusable bags were available. You would not have a fee for a bag, but would be required to buy a reusable bag. That seems to make more sense. 5/09/2023 11:14 AM Stop charging for everything. We pay enough in property taxes here and this really seems like a money grubbing scheme vs a way of reducing waste. You already get like 5 bucks a month from us for the stupid compost bin we don’t use. Instead, try educating people on how they can reduce waste and give ideas and resources and stats. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 37 of 55 5/09/2023 11:35 AM Don’t allow businesses to use plastic bags! All should be paper or reusable 5/09/2023 12:24 PM I like this, and is in practice in the state we used to live in. I just worry about the impact on low income customers, especially those who take public transportation. They likely need a bag and the financial impact is greater. If there was a way to exempt those with food stamps or other efforts so our low income residents aren’t impacted that would be ideal. 5/09/2023 01:02 PM This proposal is absurd. I recycle & compost everything I possibly can. Instead of wasting taxpayer dollars debating whether or not you should require shoppers to pay for bags, why don't you use that time to promote recycling & composting by Edina residents. You already have those programs in place, emphasize them instead of coming up with more ridiculous requirements & time-wasting busy work. Only about 30% of Edina residents compost using the Vierkant containers provided, which diverts approximately 70 tons of organics from going into landfills monthly. Every resident is charged for the service, but less than a third are using it. Multiply that by how much more would be diverted if the majority of residents compost. It's foolish for them not to compost, since they're paying for it. Why don't you point out that they're wasting their money & harming the environment? Start a campaign in Edina to recycle & compost. Stop wasting time & money coming up with MORE busy work & new programs! Concentrate & promote the programs you already have in place! 5/09/2023 01:18 PM Allow recycling pick up every week. With Amazon packages piling up, half our cardboard winds up in the trash because the recycling cans are full. Change recycling pick up to every week 5/09/2023 02:12 PM The city could recognize that some goals, even good and admirable goals, are not always the role of a municipality. 5/09/2023 02:55 PM Outlaw plastic bag use. Reusable only 5/09/2023 03:04 PM Stop sending staff to out of town events. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 38 of 55 5/09/2023 03:43 PM I find plastic waste especially troublesome. I would like to see packing changes to reduce all plastic - produce boxes, take out food containers including styrofoam, and plastic film/bags. 5/09/2023 04:26 PM Most of the restaurants around 50th and France are using compostable dishes and utensils but there are no compost bins outside in public places like the Plaza on Nolan Mains. Every time I go to a public even there I want to scream! 5/09/2023 04:27 PM I believe carry out bags would be such a small portion of the waste stream. 35% or more is food waste. You are better off making all take out containers compostable like SLP, Minneapolis, and St. Paul. Although some food containers do not hold well up to that. Also, you should provide more information on how to compost at home and avoid pests in the summer. 5/09/2023 05:08 PM This seems a broad brush and doesn’t address the bigger area impacting more of us with drive up. When I shop in a store I bring my own bags. Or no bag like Costco and I just load up my trunk. But a majority of my shopping is drive up which I can’t imagine target could do with a different system unless someone partners with them to develop bins they dump in your trunk or something PM no bag solution put on merchants for order pickup and order delivery. secondly, i use the paper bags for trash bags. 5/09/2023 05:40 PM Discontinue the organics program that adds additional burden to the taxpayers via additional trucks every week and additional fees that are unwanted when not used. 5/09/2023 05:59 PM These questions seem biased toward adding re-usable bags. Nd question 2 above didn’t include “never” as an option which to me invalidates that question! From a larger standpoint, please focus on bigger issues such as energy efficiency in commercial buildings which are responsible for far more GHG emissions than any lack of recycling efforts! People like to pat themselves on the back for reusable bags - let’s address real change in buildings., 5/09/2023 06:37 PM If this is passed, I'll shop outside city limits and burn more fossil fuel in the process. Your call. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 39 of 55 5/09/2023 08:08 PM Please do not implement this policy. I completely disagree with it. 5/09/2023 08:37 PM Include apartments in composting 5/10/2023 05:35 AM Encourage residents to use reusable bags—do NOT mandate our behaviors. 5/10/2023 08:00 AM A fee for bags increases store profits and and consumer expenses. It. does nothing to reduce waste because people will still buy them. This is a very shortsighted proposal that basically does nothing to help reduce waste. Plastic bags should be eliminated completely if you really want to make a difference. Please quit wasting tax dollars on things like this. 5/10/2023 08:16 AM Offer a credit for bringing in a reusable bag 5/10/2023 08:56 AM Getting rid of plastic altogether. 09:56 AM Let people live their lives. Responsible citizens already recycle, etc. and that includes bags. Encourage better recycling 5/10/2023 01:32 PM Charge a fee (with proceeds going to city environmental causes) for single use beverage containers 5/10/2023 04:14 PM Stop forcing citizens to participate in programs. The organic s program is a joke h 5/10/2023 06:57 PM Honestly this ordinance is just dumb. It wont reduce waste the way you think it'll reduce waste. Help large apartments with recycling (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 40 of 55 5/11/2023 11:41 AM 5/11/2023 04:44 PM Reducing waste in Edina could include so many other initiatives that benefit the residents, without harming them financially or otherwise. This is not the time to increase any type of extra taxes on Edina residents, that are already paying high taxes for living here in addition to all of the economic challenges we are also facing. How about focus more on improving the high crime throughout Edina and provide incentives to residents, business owners, and landlords for purchasing security cameras that could catch criminals and prevent more crime. And since Edina is focusing on adding rental properties throughout, the city needs to increase the frequency of inspecting rentals throughout the year to truly see how much waste and inefficiencies are contributing to the environment. You can walk through many neighborhoods and identify glaring issues on properties or buildings that require immediate attention, but instead they just get worse each year due to lack of enforcement. Implementing a carryout bag is low priority and hopefully you will reconsider this initiative and focus on more urgent items that the residents have been pleading for. 5/11/2023 06:20 PM How about you focus on things that really matter to your citizens like Crime and Infrastructure? This is a ridiculous issue on which to be focusing city time and attention. Start enforcing the laws and stop pandering to the criminals. What is your policy on traffic control and paying police officers enough to be an employer of choice for the best recruits? 5/11/2023 07:58 PM Please increase the frequency of recycling pickup! Our recycling is always overflowing and our trash never is. In fact, I'd love to see the city pick up recycling WEEKLY and trash every other week 5/11/2023 08:34 PM See below. Focus on ways to encourage composting and make it easier. Our prior city in CA gave residents a countertop bin so it was easy to transfer to the city bin. Up recycling pick up to weekly. People can’t recycle more if their bins are overflowing. Do not try to extract money from residents to line businesses’ pockets. AM Stay out of peoples business. Let people think and decide for themselves. Make programs voluntary. Unlike your compost program where it i not voluntary, because you charge everyone for it. Voluntary means you only pay if you participate. Perhaps Edina should be focused on bigger issues, like crime uptick , instead of what grocery bags we use. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 41 of 55 5/12/2023 05:47 AM I like the idea of making this as easy as possible for residents and non-residents. Send out free bags, offer options for bag rentals (where you get your money back), and make sure those who are most affected financially do not pay (like you’ve already outlined). It would be great at some point to make businesses carry the load of this instead of residents but I get the issues at hand with doing that currently. 5/12/2023 06:34 AM Recycling. 5/12/2023 06:42 AM Giving a rebate for bringing your own bags city wide is more enticing than charging a fee for bags. 5/14/2023 06:47 PM promote the use of reusable bags and reusing items more overall. For example, the clothing swap was a lot of fun and I was able to receive a reusable bag that I now use frequently. I also think a credit for reusable bags is much better than a cost for other bags. I always bring my own bags to Target to save the 5 cents per bag. Things are becoming much more expensive and budgets a lot tighter, we should reward people for making sustainable swaps rather than penalize those who don't or cannot afford to. In my opinion, the city hosting more events about reusing things and helping to educate the community is the way forward. 4/14/2023 01:55 PM In conjunction with the ordinance, I would like to know how the City can work with big box stores, like Target, to get them to adopt different practices to their curbside pickup practices. Target currently offers NO option for me to opt out of bags, and the way that they pull their stock means I end up with many more bags than I would if I shopped in store. Target does have curbside pilot programs in other places with both reusable bags (like a boomerang bag program) and totes. This ordinance seems like an opportunity to explore a conversation with them, and perhaps other big box stores in our City, about changing the way they provide bags for curbside pickup. My efforts as an individual on this matter in working with Target have been unsuccessful to date. It's not really a question, but a concern to Optional question (138 response(s), 63 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident Q36 What other questions do you have about this proposal? (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 42 of 55 consider... I can see how people who utilize grocery delivery programs might have objections to being charged a bag fee, especially in light of the proposed legislation at the state level that would mandate a 75 cent fee for delivery of taxable merchandise to homes and businesses. 4/14/2023 02:16 PM Test comment 4/14/2023 06:38 PM Quite frankly, I’m wondering why it’s taking so long (and facing such push-back) for such a tiny step toward lessening our environmental impact 4/15/2023 06:40 AM Thank you for your work on this critical effort! 4/17/2023 01:25 PM Plastic only for bag fees. 4/19/2023 07:56 AM Not necessary to charge for bags. Just one more layer of tax and bureaucracy for citizens. We should be doing the opposite of whatever Minneapolis does. 4/19/2023 08:00 AM Please consider the impact to businesses with this proposal 4/21/2023 03:44 PM Charging the same amount for all bags is not going to get rid of the plastic bags. Ban the plastic bags. Help the enviroment! Ban the plastic bags. Kerp It Simple. Got It? Thank You 4/21/2023 03:45 PM The city should provide two cloth bags per household on request. Those with low income and no bags could be subject to income shaming, which Edina needs to try very hard to avoid. 4/21/2023 05:46 PM Do you not think that people will shop outside Edina if this goes into effect? I t will hour the grocery stores in Edina. 4/22/2023 08:58 AM I do not feel the merchant should keep the bag fee, but that it should be donated to a local environmental resource. Put that money back into the city. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 43 of 55 4/22/2023 01:15 PM Na 4/23/2023 08:39 AM I nearly always use my own reusable bags when I am physically the person doing the shopping, but the problem is when the consumer uses a shopping service (Shipt, etc) or order pickup orders from Target, Cub, Lunds, Jerrys, or any retailers that offer order pickup or shopping services on behalf of the consumer. In that situation, the retailer will fulfill the order with plastic or paper bags or whatever bags the retailer wants and the consumer has no choice, so if you implement this new ordinance, for any order pickup order, you are just introducing an additional tax and burden on the consumer as they have no way to ask the retailer to use a reusable bag. If you move forward with this ordinance you should have an exclusion for order pickup orders where the consumer can't take action / has no choice on what bag is used to fulfill the order pickup, otherwise the ordinance should charge the retailer per bag, not the consumer, as an incentive for the retailer to change their bags to reusable for order pickup. I've written previously to Target and other retailers about various ways they could implement consumer choice on reusable bags or boxes for order pickup, but have received no response. 11:59 AM Look at Aldi and Trader Joe's as examples of reducing waste through it's programs. They seem balanced and doable and don't cost extra unless the customer chooses to purchase a bag. I like that at least Trader Joe's provides paper at no additional cost if I forget my reusable bag or have a different vehicle with me 4/23/2023 06:30 PM Companies SHOULD be paying and changing their ways--incentified, taxed, credited for their actions. Target is a MN company--work with them. Consumers should NOT be charged for pull-up/carry-out services. The customer cannot control what bags are used when they do drive/up services and this is essential in a post-COVID world. I would like to see that the merchants that charge the .05 or whatever fee is, donate the funds back to a green initiative in the city or within Minneapolis / Twin Cities area. I do not like the lack of transparency the merchant has with the fee that is charged. If I was charged that fee, I would want to know where its going, how its being used, etc. This should have been a question on the survey. If this per bag fee passes, it will only push me further to continue to (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 44 of 55 4/24/2023 08:32 PM shop in EP. Being western Edina it is cheaper for us to shop there (tax levies, bag fees…) 4/25/2023 04:20 PM I used 1 as most favorable. It was not specified which way you wanted it to go. 28 PM There are so many elderly people in edina who this would be an huge adjustment for. They are living on fixed incomes or do not read websites to get info. 4/26/2023 10:28 AM Businesses will figure it out. Government is to costly all ready and all you do is add more cost to it. Stay out of trying to run the private sector 4/26/2023 11:01 AM Comment, not a question. I think the plastic bags need to be discouraged. However, the brown ones can be very useful in reducing the use of plastic garbage bags and they can also be filled with compostables that are too big for the smaller compostable bags. I would not want to see a charge for the brown paper bags. We compost and recycle and it takes us 2 weeks or more to fill a paper bag with trash. We have no wet garbage. 4/26/2023 01:42 PM Many’s stores won’t allow you to bring your own bags and will refuse to bag them in your bags. Most recently Target on York turned a resident away for bringing her own bags. Have you engaged any of the business community in this crazy decision!?! Charging people MORE money to do their basic daily “chores” is absolutely unacceptable. 4/26/2023 04:29 PM I'll likely grocery shop more in Eden Prairie. I can't imagine Jerry's is happy about this. People will buy less if they forget to bring their own bags. This is a horrible idea. I never shop in Minneapolis because of this. Shame on you for punishing local businesses and the voters/taxpayers who live here. 4/27/2023 05:08 AM None, don’t do this. 07:53 AM I have always assumed that when you shop at a store, you are already paying for overhead items like the kind of bags a store uses. Why add a fee on top of the costs that are already a part of the fees? (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 45 of 55 Costs have been going up anyway, why burden the consumer more and reward the seller more (they won't lower their costs but will add another fee onto your total). This is pushing an agenda that rewards those that can afford reusable bags and punishes those that can't, don't you think? AM This idea creates separation of rich and poor. While the wealthy can afford an additional “tax” on goods on top of the already insanely high taxes that have come from the federal and state governments, there are many families in Edina who cannot afford additional costs, even minor costs like the cost of a bag for their groceries. If this proposed idea is put into place, my family and I will no longer be shopping in Edina. While supporting local businesses is very important to me, creating a wider chasm between rich and poor is where I draw the line. And also, don’t we already pay for those bags in the cost of goods when we shop at grocery stores and other shopping places? I have a hard time believing companies haven’t already adjusted prices to cover the cost of bags. 4/27/2023 12:28 PM Request each merchant communicate at point of sale what they are doing with $$. Hint: community focus would be wise What problem are you trying to solve? Without knowing the starting point how will you know if you are changing behaviors or just monetizing and covering merchant costs. Start with plastic and then move beyond after measuring success/fail using benchmarks and feedback. Make sure .05 bag is not taxable item. Signage at point of sale mandatory. Nobody likes surprises…even 5 cents. What issues do merchants have in point of sale and accounting? Be nice if carrot (by bringing your own bag every week you…) could be tried before the stick ($). Action has to be seen as a visible, measurable community benefit. Tell the story. So what? What’s in it for me? Reinforce message and repeat, repeat, repeat. 4/27/2023 12:43 PM Where is your data to show how this helps? My guess is that people's habits will not change. Paying a fee is not going to change habits. If there is good data to show what impact this will ultimately have (not guessing or saying "common sense says" (which I've heard expressed.by staff). If you can't define a measurable outcome, this is just virtue signaling. BTW...question 9 I would answer none of the above. I'm not a fan of this survey. For example, a "free bag..." Someone is paying for it. If you go to the State Fair and many other events, you can get a free usable bag. I'm disappointed that we need a recycling/environment staff member. We were taking about eliminating plastic bags, 20+ years ago. If going electric is such a grand plan, again, where is the data? If going electric works, (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 46 of 55 consumers will elect to do it because of cost, well defined outcomes, etc. Mandates are government overreach. We've been recycling all of our lives as well as caring for the environment. What happened to turn down the heat, turn off lights, conserve water, collect rain water, organic fertilizer, etc. 4/27/2023 03:33 PM Total waste of time energy and effort 4/27/2023 04:13 PM comment: give people warnings at the point of sale at the beginning of the campaign (for the first 6 months or so) that they should be charged a fee but if they are surprised or forgetful, have the sales person make it a big deal that they are getting an “exception today”. If they shop in Minneapolis, they should already be familiar with the bag fee. Also, tell stories of other cities and how they have learned/ adjusted 4/27/2023 08:59 PM Since we are a first ring suburb, I suggest we adopt a bag ordinance that is the same as the one that Minneapolis has. 4/27/2023 10:48 PM Don't approve this nonsense. It's stupid. And global warming is a hoax. 4/28/2023 08:43 AM If there are not plastic grocery bags at store, then I will have to PURCHASE GARBAGE BAGS. So what does this accomplish? 4/28/2023 02:47 PM Seems like Edina is trying to out-do Minneapolis in the silly ideas department. This is nothing more than a “feel good” proposal to make our “leaders” at City Hall think they have done something positive for the environment, when in reality it does nothing. I personally will shop at stores outside of Edina if this idea passes. There are grocery stores, liquor stores, clothing stores , Target stores, etc. that are minutes away from Edina. EP, SLP, Richfield, Bloomington, etc. You’re going to end up hurting Edina businesses. Bags are not a big problem. Why don’t you work on something more important, like making Edina more affordable for older residents on fixed incomes, or reducing the escalating crime and gunfire in Edina, or reducing the amount of money wasted by Edina government? Bags are NOT a problem! 4/28/2023 09:10 PM Since the merchant is able to keep the money from this initiative, I strongly suggest you have clear guidelines on what merchants should (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 47 of 55 provide to customers. It's frustrating for customers to have to pay for bags that can tear. Either the compostable ones like the ones from Co-Op that I mentioned above, or the plastic and paper options like I mentioned Washington State uses. 4/29/2023 08:54 AM None 4/29/2023 08:56 AM This is great. Thank you for pursuing it. 4/29/2023 11:33 AM Why are you so intent on a regressive tax that will only benefit merchants, most of whom are already doing fine? The money from such a tax should go towards a better Edina environment and educating the public on how they can reduce waste. I oppose this proposed ordinance as it now stands. 4/29/2023 11:56 AM This is a terrible idea as consumers are already fighting high inflation. Adding to their expense and reducing their demand is a disadvantage for Edina residents and businesses. 4/29/2023 01:56 PM Instead of automatically giving customers a bag for a single or a few items merchants could ask if a bag is wanted. 4/29/2023 04:55 PM Why would anyone in the City of Edina want to implement a flat tax that would have a disproportionately negative financial impact on people of lesser means? 4/29/2023 05:33 PM When I have faced bag fees in other cities, I have found it to be a large inconvenience. I would ask that you're reconsider this proposal 4/30/2023 05:26 AM Why do you have people register to complete the survey. It should be an anonymous survey. 4/30/2023 06:39 AM We also rely on the paper bags we get from the grocery stores to use for our recycling. Please stop this initiative and focus your attention on other things that matter like improving the schools. No question but a comment. My real concern with this proposal is that (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 48 of 55 4/30/2023 08:44 AM the merchant can use the money as they please. Why not put that money back into environmental efforts or the city’s general fund. 2023 09:13 AM I am opposed to this proposal. 4/30/2023 01:15 PM None 4/30/2023 08:29 PM Why does Edina insist on anti-consumer legislation such as this and the recent sales tax increase? Living in Edina is expensive enough as it is, if money is tight we should look to cut costs rather than raise more money. I work in Richfield and often drive to other cities like Eden Prarie and St. Louis Park, if a plastic bag tax passes I will move most of my grocery shopping to other cities without that tax. I have more than enough reusable bags but it is about the principal. 4/30/2023 09:07 PM There are people like us who bring reusable bags for shopping or for going to the farmer's market but also like to occasionally get paper bags or plastic bags at the grocery store (more often paper) because we reuse them. For example, we use brown grocery bags to collect our recycling in and then put the recyclables in the recycle bag inside the brown bag so it is also recycled. There are no paper or plastic bags that we don't reuse in some way. I would prefer not to have to pay for these, but would pay rather than stop occasionally getting them. :48 AM This needs to be on a ballot 5/01/2023 03:45 PM I want to be sure you have clearly stated goals and are prepared to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy. Need clear metrics - # of bags used before/after the policy, # of recyclable bags used before/after, amount of money generated, change in practice as a result of the money (using more recycled or recyclable products? What is done with the money generated by the merchant? Please don't do this unless you are going to evaluate whether you got the desired response. 5/01/2023 04:51 PM Why push the cost of implementation on to the residents? Plastic bags are the problem. Have the merchants deal with it. I love using brown paper (recyclable) for merchandise and then reuse them for cans, bottles, newspapers. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 49 of 55 5/02/2023 02:22 PM Have you considered the studies that show people don't wash reusable bags and, as a result, increase the amount of bacteria and viruses that get passed along to the rest of the community? What about the fact that there are studies that show the total cost of energy to produce a reusable bag and its effective lifetime is less superior to that of a reusable plastic bag? It's mind-blowing we're even considering this -- I expected better of Edina leadership. This is an exceptionally bad idea. Perhaps you can tell us what percentage of Edina homes are actively utilizing the composting program that we're being charged for? Before engaging in another foray into 'feel-good' efforts that do little for their intended benefit, I'd like to see the economic justification of that program I also didn't want to be a part of. 5/02/2023 07:03 PM The fee will raise consciousness of the issue of waste. Outlaw plastic bags in Edina. Mandate compostible carry out food containers in Edina. PM Implement reusable bag requirement ASAP - several other cities/companies have already done this, no need to study it further. It’s so easy to implement. 5/03/2023 07:19 AM Why is the merchant retaining the fee money and able to use it at their discretion? It would be more effective if the city collected it and used it for other green initiatives such as solar panels, electric vehicle charging station, etc. If the merchant is keeping the money from the fee, it should be earmarked for sustainability initiatives not added to their profit. Many stores are going the brown bag route with handles, discouraging plastics. Brown bags take energy to make, more than plastic? Cost and efficiency? Aren't some plastic resins now biodegradable? More research and data? 5/03/2023 08:18 PM Why are we trying to be like California? We just passed a marajuana bill, people breaking into cars every night and we have homeless living on the streets while we build multi million dollar apartment buildings on every corner under the heading of "affordable housing". However, I don't know who thinks that $2500/month for an apartment is affordable. We are paying outlandish prices at the grocery store and now we are going to force people to resuse bags or pay a fee for (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 50 of 55 paper bags. Seems like there are much bigger fish to fry in this city than dealing with a few grocery bags (ie, crime and homelessness). By the way...how is that forced composting plan working out? I don't see any of my neighbors using their food waste bins on trash day...yet we are all still paying a fee for that too. You see, the government cannot legislate the citizens to do what you think is the right thing to do. You charge us all for the green waste/composting disposal bins...yet we don't use them. So, it's a waste. You can charge us for paper bags at the grocery store...and people will pay for them rather than remember to bring in reusable bags. Still there will be waste. It won't solve the waste problem. 5/05/2023 07:03 PM Why…why? Spend more time on solving crime 5/07/2023 07:35 AM The opinion of Edina businesses, large and small, should be the key driver in on whether or not to implement this change. The businesses I have talked to at the 50th and France retail area think this is a ridiculous proposal. 5/08/2023 08:36 AM My issue with charging of bags is not actually charging, it is who gets the money and how it is used. The cost of bags are just part of doing business. Having the business get the money from the bag sales doesn't seem like the best option, since their cost isn't going down. How about take the money from the bag sales and use it toward green/climate change programs. 5/09/2023 07:25 AM If we ever go back to a covid type problem, personal reusable bags weren't allowed for a while and then you could bring them but had to bag groceries yourself. What happens if this type of situation arises again? Also, I think this would be harder on our older citizens. 5/09/2023 09:46 AM No questions, but thank you for bringing this new ordinance forward, it feels overdue. Much appreciated. 5/09/2023 09:57 AM I do not understand why our city is even involved at this level. We use our paper bags for recycling purposes. What would we put the cans bottles for recycling as well as newspapers and regular paper in etc etc in. We use all paper bags now, at they not compostable?? 5/09/2023 11:03 AM We have moved from Hawaii in which all bags except reusable bags were available. You would not have a fee for a bag, but would be (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 51 of 55 required to buy a reusable bag. That seems to make more sense. That would éliminate the issue more quickly. It does not take long to start remembering. After a few visits, you do. 5/09/2023 11:14 AM What are the stats on this policy showing that it actually works? How much money does the city anticipate making off of this and where will that money be going? 5/09/2023 11:35 AM Why not just eliminate plastic bags? Why charge for them and put that onto consumers? The stores should be responsible for the waste they create by offering poor choices 5/09/2023 11:57 AM This is a terrible idea. As a mom of young children, getting a stroller, diaper bag, kid, purse, kids toy, and everything else you need to go to a store in the dead of winter is enough to remember, now u want me to carry around reusable bags… 5/09/2023 01:02 PM Already asked, but I'll ask again - Why are you trying to create more busy work, wasting time & taxpayer money by coming up with more programs, when you already have very good ones in place that you need to encourage more residents to participate in??? PM Is this an optics play? It seems like there are other ways, like a public recycling bin, so we don't need to drive to Bloomington to drop off recyclables like cardboard. 5/09/2023 01:24 PM I dislike the idea of paper bags having an associated fee, as they are recyclable/compostable. It should be clarified where the funds from such a fee would actually go. 5/09/2023 01:31 PM How will this impact instacart/grocery delivery? 5/09/2023 02:12 PM Why include paper bags? 5/09/2023 03:04 PM Stop forcing us to pay for initiatives that fit some council members political agenda. You are already forcing composting which is a waste of money. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 52 of 55 5/09/2023 04:26 PM I would like to see plastic bags banned! 5/09/2023 04:27 PM What environmental impact does the city think this new bag proposal would have? Also, it wasn’t an option but I think everyone will just pay for the bag. 5/09/2023 05:08 PM See above re what do stores think? I reuse all paper bags multiple times, plastic gets recycled each week. Perhaps adding plastic bag pick up as an option would help, we rarely have organic waste i would prefer for a plastic option Or please move to one trash hauler or one per neighborhood. That is far more impactful on our streets (especially if you paid for them!) and carbon emissions. That feels like the more impactful win and less daily nuisance environmental change than forgetting bags and being charged 5/09/2023 05:40 PM If this proposal is passed we will buy our groceries only at Costco and Trader Joe's. Jerry's and the other Edina grocery stores will lose our business. Like the organics program that was forced down our throats, we will boycott the bag ordinance, too. 5/09/2023 06:37 PM Why you think this will accomplish anything other than to make yourselves feel like you're doing something? 5/09/2023 08:08 PM I do not agree with this proposal. I do not feel the city has any business regulating carryout bags. 5/10/2023 05:35 AM Please do not start down this road. The residents already feel that the staff has too much power; and that the council neither listens nor cares what the tax-paying residents think or want. Stop. Just stop. Please. 5/10/2023 08:16 AM This is not a question. It is a comment but your survey doesn't have a space for comments which is frustrating! My comment is that most, if not all of my neighbors use the brown grocery bags for their recycling. Second comment: I know several Edina residents who donate their brown grocery bags to VEAP. VEAP food-shelf is always asking for donations of grocery bags so they can fill them up with food donations for people in need of groceries. Last comment: Why can't Edina reward people for bringing in their own bags by offering 10 cents off? Or a similar amount? I think Whole Foods does this. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 53 of 55 5/10/2023 08:56 AM I wish target pick up allowed for a bag exchange program or used another bag option to plastic. For me personally that would be huge. I think another area to focus on would be take out containers and use compostable ones. I think having the fee going to sustainable practices would be preferable over company discretion. Maybe it goes to a consult that can help move the company to being more sustainable. 5/10/2023 09:56 AM Why? You are already controlling our lives far too much. A car can barely idle at 25 mph. Just stop 5/10/2023 12:53 PM Not a fan of this. The resources it takes to have reusable bags for outweigh the resources for paper or plastic. PM This is a horrible proposal 2023 07:52 PM I like the idea of a fee on bags, but my answers don't reflect that because: 1) What happens when people pay for grocery delivery or curbside pickup? Lots of these services pack very little in bags... which would make the person's bill higher. If it were me, I might think the store was trying to get extra money from me this way. 2) I don't like that the store gets to keep the money from this bag fee- I doubt that I will see prices drop and I might, again, think that they are packing my bags in such a way that gets me to have to pay more 5/11/2023 04:44 PM No questions, but please reconsider this proposal and focus on items that are more urgent for the residents, with the least amount of financial impact. thank you 5/11/2023 06:20 PM Why would this be a focus for the city at this time? There are so many more important priorities. 5/11/2023 07:58 PM My main comment on this proposal is: 1) great that people are being charged for not bringing their own bags but 2) I don't love that establishments can do whatever they want with the funds. It feels like stores are just getting a free revenue stream. I'd like to see 50-100% of the revenue made from charging for bags go back to environmental causes. Then it feels more like a win for the environment AND city environmental goals AND business. (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 54 of 55 5/11/2023 08:34 PM This proposal is trash. If I’m going to be charged a tax for a “single use” bag, the STORE shouldn’t get to keep the money AND get to use it however they wish. That’s called PROFITS. What the heck, Edina?! Merchants don’t need more of our money. Whose side are you on? I lived in the Bay Area for 10 years during which there were bag ordinances. 5 cents a bag is enough to change behavior, but at what environmental cost? A lot of the “reusable” bags are poorly made, break easily and end up in the landfill just like a plastic film bag. If you want to change habits, restrict the BUSINESSES from providing plastic bags at all. Switch people back to paper which is recyclable if clean and compostable if not. Don’t tax customers to line merchants’ pockets. 5/12/2023 04:47 AM No questions- you need to focus on real issues. This is not one of them 5/12/2023 05:47 AM What is the feedback from people with lower income? How can they be well supported in this process? Is there a way to eventually have businesses carry the tax instead of residents? What is being done to hold businesses even more accountable to environmental impacts? 5/12/2023 06:34 AM This is ridiculous. Edina has a high tax rate already. Budget! 5/12/2023 06:42 AM How will this hurt grocery stores that do drive up? Or stores like Jerry’s where someone else is bagging your groceries for you? This will also impact places like VEAP who rely on donations of used paper bags so their clients can bring their groceries home. If people have to pay for bags or use reusable bags they will have less paper bags to donate to VEAP. Optional question (95 response(s), 106 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-a-resident (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 55 of 55 Exhibit 2 Edina Visitors Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey Summary (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 13 April 2023 - 16 May 2023 PROJECT NAME: Carryout Bag Ordinance FILTER BY: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) Answered : I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated-with-a-business-in-Edina SURVEY QUESTIONS (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 1 of 14 Q1 Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) 5 (100.0%) 5 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) I am not a resident or affiliated with a business in Edina I am a resident I own or work at a business in Edina Question options Mandatory Question (5 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated-with-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 2 of 14 Q22 Are you in favor of a required bag fee? 1 (100.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) No Yes Other (please specify) Question options Mandatory Question (1 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated-with-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 3 of 14 Q23 Are you in favor of a voluntary bag fee? Businesses could volunteer to implement a bag fee, rather than being required by the City. 1 (100.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Other (please specify)No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (1 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated-with-a-business-in- (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 4 of 14 Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 5 of 14 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. I don't know enough to answer Maybe No Yes Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 plastic bags paper bags compostable bags reusable bags 5 4 5 3 1 2 Mandatory Question (5 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated-with-a-business-in- (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 6 of 14 Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 7 of 14 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 8 of 14 Yes : 5 No : 0 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 9 of 14 Yes : 4 No : 1 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 10 of 14 Yes : 5 No : 0 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 11 of 14 Yes : 3 No : 2 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 reusable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 12 of 14 4/14/2023 01:46 PM Again, testing the site. 5/10/2023 06:43 AM Have Zero Waste speakers come present to residents. Have an eco fair hosted by Edina 5/10/2023 07:38 AM Banning single use take out containers and silverware and transition to reusable and or compostable products. Incentive the change and create easy to read signage for patrons and make it so businesses can actually follow the rules put in place. Recycling in plastic bags gets thrown, and compost in plastic bags gets thrown. 5/11/2023 04:31 PM More education/classes available to residents Q35 How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? Optional question (4 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated- with-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 13 of 14 4/14/2023 01:46 PM One more test comment! 5/10/2023 06:43 AM If you’re on government assistance would you be exempt like other cities that have passed an ordinance charging for bags? 5/10/2023 07:38 AM . 5/11/2023 04:31 PM Where do the funds from the bag charge go? Will people with food stamps be exempt from this charge? Q36 What other questions do you have about this proposal? Optional question (4 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-am-not-a-resident-or-affiliated- with-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 14 of 14 Exhibit 3 Edina Business Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey Summary (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey SURVEY RESPONSE REPORT 13 April 2023 - 16 May 2023 PROJECT NAME: Carryout Bag Ordinance FILTER BY: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) Answered : I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina SURVEY QUESTIONS (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 1 of 52 Q1 Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) 6 (100.0%) 6 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) I own or work at a business in Edina I am a resident I am not a resident or affiliated with a business in Edina Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 2 of 52 ATen 4/14/2023 02:03 PM Edina Dry Goods SherriFink 4/17/2023 02:15 PM Clean Juice theoptical 4/24/2023 12:19 PM The Optical at 50th and France Carrie 4/28/2023 06:54 AM Mainstream Boutique of Edina St. Peter's - Edina 5/08/2023 09:16 AM St. Peter’s Business 5/11/2023 01:43 PM D'Amico Q2 What is the name of the Edina business you are affiliated with? Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Single Line Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 3 of 52 Q3 Do own this business or are you an employee 4 (66.7%) 4 (66.7%) 2 (33.3%) 2 (33.3%) I own this business I am an employee of this business Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 4 of 52 Q4 What kind, and how many, carryout bags does your business typically provide to customers on a monthly basis? 100,001+ monthly 50,000-100,000 monthly 25,0001-50,000 monthly 10,001-25,000 monthly 5,001-10,000 monthly 1,001-5,000 monthly 501-1000 monthly 101-500 monthly 1-100 monthly 0 Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Plastic bags Brown paper bags Paper bags (not brown) Compostable bags Reusable bags (plastic) Reusable bags (cotton or other fabric) 4 3 5 5 4 3 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 5 of 52 Q4 What kind, and how many, carryout bags does your business typically provide to customers on a monthly basis? 0 : 4 1-100 monthly : 1 101-500 monthly : 0 501-1000 monthly : 0 1,001-5,000 monthly : 0 5,001-10,000 monthly : 1 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 5 Plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 6 of 52 (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 7 of 52 0 : 3 1-100 monthly : 0 101-500 monthly : 0 501-1000 monthly : 2 1,001-5,000 monthly : 1 5,001-10,000 monthly : 0 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 Brown paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 8 of 52 0 : 5 1-100 monthly : 0 101-500 monthly : 1 501-1000 monthly : 0 1,001-5,000 monthly : 0 5,001-10,000 monthly : 0 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Paper bags (not brown) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 9 of 52 0 : 5 1-100 monthly : 0 101-500 monthly : 0 501-1000 monthly : 0 1,001-5,000 monthly : 1 5,001-10,000 monthly : 0 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 10 of 52 0 : 4 1-100 monthly : 2 101-500 monthly : 0 501-1000 monthly : 0 1,001-5,000 monthly : 0 5,001-10,000 monthly : 0 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 5 Reusable bags (plastic) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 11 of 52 0 : 3 1-100 monthly : 2 101-500 monthly : 0 501-1000 monthly : 1 1,001-5,000 monthly : 0 5,001-10,000 monthly : 0 10,001-25,000 monthly : 0 25,0001-50,000 monthly : 0 50,000-100,000 monthly : 0 100,001+ monthly : 0 1 2 3 4 Reusable bags (cotton or other fabric) (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 12 of 52 Q5 Does your business offer carryout bags made of other materials to customers? 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) Yes (please specify)No Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Dropdown Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 13 of 52 Q6 Does your business use more bags than indicated above during the holiday months (November-December)? 5 (83.3%) 5 (83.3%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Other (please specify)Yes, more than double Yes, 100% more Yes, 50% more Yes, 25% more Yes, 10% more No Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Dropdown Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 14 of 52 Q7 Where do you purchase your business's carryout bags? Bags are sourced from a company outside the USA Bags are sourced from a company outside Minnesota, within USA Bags are sourced from a company in Minnesota N/A Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Plastic bags Paper bags Compostable bags Reusable bags 4 2 5 2 2 1 2 2 1 21 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 15 of 52 Q7 Where do you purchase your business's carryout bags? N/A : 4 Bags are sourced from a company in Minnesota : 0 Bags are sourced from a company outside Minnesota, within USA : 2 Bags are sourced from a company outside the USA : 0 1 2 3 4 5 Plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 16 of 52 N/A : 2 Bags are sourced from a company in Minnesota : 2 Bags are sourced from a company outside Minnesota, within USA : 2 Bags are sourced from a company outside the USA : 0 1 2 3 Paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 17 of 52 N/A : 5 Bags are sourced from a company in Minnesota : 0 Bags are sourced from a company outside Minnesota, within USA : 1 Bags are sourced from a company outside the USA : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 18 of 52 N/A : 2 Bags are sourced from a company in Minnesota : 1 Bags are sourced from a company outside Minnesota, within USA : 2 Bags are sourced from a company outside the USA : 1 1 2 3 Reusable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 19 of 52 Q8 What was your average per bag cost in 2022? N/A $1.01+ per bag $0.51-$1.00 per bag $0.25-$0.50 per bag $0.11-$0.25 per bag $0.06-$0.10 per bag $0.01-$0.05 per bag less than $0.01 per bag Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Plastic carryout bags Paper carryout bags Compostable carryout bags Reusable carryout bags 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 2 4 2 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 20 of 52 Q8 What was your average per bag cost in 2022? less than $0.01 per bag : 1 $0.01-$0.05 per bag : 0 $0.06-$0.10 per bag : 0 $0.11-$0.25 per bag : 0 $0.25-$0.50 per bag : 2 $0.51-$1.00 per bag : 0 $1.01+ per bag : 0 N/A : 3 1 2 3 4 Plastic carryout bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 21 of 52 less than $0.01 per bag : 0 $0.01-$0.05 per bag : 0 $0.06-$0.10 per bag : 1 $0.11-$0.25 per bag : 2 $0.25-$0.50 per bag : 0 $0.51-$1.00 per bag : 0 $1.01+ per bag : 1 N/A : 2 1 2 3 Paper carryout bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 22 of 52 less than $0.01 per bag : 1 $0.01-$0.05 per bag : 0 $0.06-$0.10 per bag : 1 $0.11-$0.25 per bag : 0 $0.25-$0.50 per bag : 0 $0.51-$1.00 per bag : 0 $1.01+ per bag : 0 N/A : 4 1 2 3 4 5 Compostable carryout bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 23 of 52 less than $0.01 per bag : 0 $0.01-$0.05 per bag : 1 $0.06-$0.10 per bag : 1 $0.11-$0.25 per bag : 0 $0.25-$0.50 per bag : 0 $0.51-$1.00 per bag : 1 $1.01+ per bag : 1 N/A : 2 1 2 3 Reusable carryout bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 24 of 52 Q9 Do you offer bag recycling on site to customers? 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 25 of 52 Q10 Are customers assessed a recycling fee to recycle carryout bags at your place of business? 3 (100.0%) 3 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Yes No Question options Mandatory Question (3 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 26 of 52 4/14/2023 02:03 PM 4/17/2023 02:15 PM Composting our fruits and veggies from juicing 4/24/2023 12:19 PM The plastic bags we purchase and give to those who don't want the fancy bags, are oxy-biodegradable. The fancy bags we give out, we encourage clients to re-use them. We provide low-cost refills of our lens cleaner when clients bring their bottles back. We encourage them to do this. We use LED lights whenever possible. We recycle our office paper products. We think twice before printing materials, and try to find every way we can to be good stewards of our planet and neighborhood. 4/28/2023 06:54 AM We do not use disposable floor cleaning products, we keep our temps below average and keep HVAC system on a schedule that reduces use when store isn't in use, we do not use artificial fragrances, we recycle all products possible, donation of all excess clothing, we do not use tissue paper when wrapping purchases unless delicate or breakable, we do not attach our on pricing tags if the manufacturer has a hang tag we can attach our pricing stickers to, we use different sizes of bags appropriate to purchase, for the last 16 months we have worked hard with our customers to have them bring in their own bags, not take a bag, or return our branded paper bags to be used for someone else, employee purchases, and donations. We've reduced the number of bags being used by our customers by 25% in the last 1 6 months just by talking to them about being responsible and reminding them via our social media. St. Peter's - Edina 5/08/2023 09:16 AM Recycling & cardboard/paper collecting Q11 Please describe any regular environmental or sustainability activities in which your business currently participates. Optional question (5 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 27 of 52 Q12 Has your business had experience with this kind of fee-per-bag requirement in other communities? 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 5 (83.3%) 5 (83.3%) No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 28 of 52 Q13 Please rank the following aspects of compliance from easy to difficult. N/A Very Difficult Somewhat Difficult Neutral Somewhat Easy Very Easy Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 Employee training Systems update Cost Customer relations 11 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 4 1 2 Mandatory Question (5 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 29 of 52 Q13 Please rank the following aspects of compliance from easy to difficult. Very Easy : 1 Somewhat Easy : 0 Neutral : 1 Somewhat Difficult : 1 Very Difficult : 1 N/A : 1 1 2 Employee training (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 30 of 52 Very Easy : 0 Somewhat Easy : 0 Neutral : 0 Somewhat Difficult : 2 Very Difficult : 3 N/A : 0 1 2 3 4 Systems update (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 31 of 52 Very Easy : 0 Somewhat Easy : 0 Neutral : 2 Somewhat Difficult : 0 Very Difficult : 1 N/A : 2 1 2 3 Cost (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 32 of 52 Very Easy : 0 Somewhat Easy : 0 Neutral : 0 Somewhat Difficult : 1 Very Difficult : 4 N/A : 0 1 2 3 4 5 Customer relations (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 33 of 52 Q14 Did you encounter any other unexpected compliance issues? If so, please explain. 1 (100.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) No Yes (please specify) Question options Mandatory Question (1 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 34 of 52 Q15 What support would be helpful for the City of Edina provide to assist with transitioning customers to the new per-bag fee? Check all that apply. Other (please specify)Fact sheet for distribution to customers Fact sheet with guidance for staff Signage Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 3 5 1 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Checkbox Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 35 of 52 4/14/2023 02:03 PM 4/17/2023 02:15 PM 3rd party delivery on food. They need to be delivered in bags for driver and customer sanitation and safety. 4/24/2023 12:19 PM Bags that are indeed re-useable, even if they don't fit your definition. 4/28/2023 06:54 AM None that I can think of 5/08/2023 09:16 AM Gift bags 5/11/2023 01:43 PM Food carry out bags should be exempt - It will be very difficult to wait for a customer to come to the restaurant before packaging their food order. Items need to be bagged as they are made and put up by the kitchen staff so items from different orders are not confused. We have 20-30 orders going at a time on a busy night. There is not enough space as it is with bags tightly packed on our counter. Also, we don't have time to ask every guest who calls in an order if they would like to, "pay for a bag or bring their own," and then explain why they are being charged. Also, asking employees to touch customers personal belongings(cloth bags especially) is not sanitary or practical in food service. We would have to wash hands and sanitize surfaces every time we touched a guests bag. Charging the guest for a bag is a point of sale nightmare. How do we charge a deliver service for their bag use? Is it taxed? Q16 Certain bags, including those used for prescriptions, produce and dry cleaning are likely to be exempt from the requirements. Are there any other bags that you think should be considered for exemption? Please explain. Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 36 of 52 Q17 Businesses will likely be required to track and report information on bag distribution and purchasing changes. What information would be most useful for you to track the impact of the new requirement? Select all that apply. How fee revenues are used Other (please specify)Number and type of bags distributed annually Number and type of bags purchased annually Fee revenue Question options 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 4 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Checkbox Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 37 of 52 4/14/2023 02:03 PM 4/17/2023 02:15 PM Not sure yet 4/28/2023 06:54 AM My bags expensive ($1.65 for a large bag) and are a cost of doing business so the total annual cost is deducted in the tax process. The $.05 per bag charge would need to be coded into our POS system and honestly slow down our cash wrap process in having us fully bag the merchandise before we fully tender the transaction. In our business, there are a lot of impulse, add on purchases at the cash wrap. I'm concerned it would be a complication in our process as I small business owner. I will need to spend a lot of time and money getting an option added to my POS system. $.05 will not make a dent in my cost, a cost I already write off. Depending on the amount I could look at making an annual donation of the funds to a local non-profit. I'm not sure yet. At best it will work out to maybe $150 a year for me in recovered cost. It will cost me more to implement a tracking process and system change. For the first couple of years I would use the money to cover the POS/system cost. 5/08/2023 09:16 AM This is a nuisance tax. We don't charge our members for any items! Q18 Please detail any initial thoughts on how your business will use the bag fee revenues. Optional question (4 response(s), 2 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 38 of 52 Q19 Would your business give a credit or refund to customers bringing their own bag or bags? 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 5 (83.3%) 5 (83.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Yes Other (please specify)No Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 39 of 52 Q20 If a required carryout bag fee is approved, what amount of lead time your business would need to prepare for implementation? 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 4 (66.7%) 4 (66.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 12 months 6 months more than 12 months 9 months 3 months Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 40 of 52 Q21 For businesses offering online order and/or curbside delivery, would you consider or be open to implementing a reusable bag exchange program? See Walmart example. 2 (33.3%) 2 (33.3%) 4 (66.7%) 4 (66.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Yes No (please explain)My business does not offer online order or curbside delivery Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 41 of 52 Q22 Are you in favor of a required bag fee? 5 (83.3%) 5 (83.3%) 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%)0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Yes Other (please specify)No Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 42 of 52 Q23 Are you in favor of a voluntary bag fee? Businesses could volunteer to implement a bag fee, rather than being required by the City. 1 (16.7%) 1 (16.7%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 2 (33.3%) 2 (33.3%) Other (please specify)No Yes Question options Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Radio Button Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 43 of 52 Q33 How do you prefer to learn about and stay in-the-know about related City of Edina policies and their associated processes? Please check all that apply. Annual update meeting/training Other (please specify)Separate business section on City of Edina website Explanatory letter or newsletter Through a business group like a BID, Chamber of Commerce or Rotary City e-newsletters Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 5 1 2 3 3 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Checkbox Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 44 of 52 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. I don't know enough to answer Maybe No Yes Question options 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 plastic bags paper bags compostable bags reusable bags 2 1 3 5 6 6 1 Mandatory Question (6 response(s)) Question type: Likert Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in-Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 45 of 52 Q34 Do you think the following bag types should include a fee to a customer to receive them when making a purchase? This does not include any bags the customer brings themselves. plastic bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 46 of 52 Yes : 2 No : 3 Maybe : 1 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 47 of 52 Yes : 1 No : 5 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 paper bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 48 of 52 Yes : 0 No : 6 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 compostable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 49 of 52 Yes : 0 No : 6 Maybe : 0 I don't know enough to answer : 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 reusable bags (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 50 of 52 4/14/2023 02:03 PM Test comment 4/24/2023 12:19 PM Offer tax incentives or rebates for businesses that use re-useable or compostable bags. :54 AM Overall education and PSAs like they did in the 70s when I was growing up. 5/08/2023 09:16 AM Grocery / product packaging and Amazon boxes are a greater problem than bags that get reused. 5/11/2023 01:43 PM ban straws 4/14/2023 02:03 PM Test comment 4/17/2023 02:15 PM When people order online and come in to pick up and then ask for a bag but transaction is complete it would make for a very difficult hand-off and frustrate customer. 3PD needs to be taken in bags for customer and driver sanitation and should be exempt from this program. 4/24/2023 12:19 PM The vast majority of our clients pay for their items up-front since they are a customized eyewear product. If we have to charge them a separate fee when they come to pick them up, because they want a bag so they don't have to juggle, that causes more time and touches, and we believe most will consider it petty. Also, almost all of our payments are credit or debit card, so an additional bag fee at delivery Q35 How else could the City accomplish its goal of reducing waste in Edina? Optional question (5 response(s), 1 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina Q36 What other questions do you have about this proposal? (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 51 of 52 will require us to pay yet another transaction fee and percentage fee to the credit card processor. For FIFTY CENTS?!?!?!?! Most people do NOT carry cash these days! 06:54 AM No other questions but our customers we've been talking to about this since January don't like it and think it's just another tax. Especially when they've learned that the collected funds are to be used at my discretion. I'm not thrilled that it makes the retailer look like the bad guy. The city has us collect the fees and then we decide what it's for. We've had much better behavior changes by working one on one with our customers. I don't think as a consumer I'm a good person to ask. I've been using reusable bags for over 10 years. I keep paper shopping bags and reusable bags in our cars at all times. If we do receive plastic bags because we've bought more than fits in our bags, we use those for garbage bags in our home and when we walk our dog. Without reusing the plastic shopping bags, we'll still be buying plastic can liners and bags for dog walks. Either way, the plastic bag is still being used. If this initiative is for the city to meet a certain ESG score, I understand it, I just think it's a lot of outlay in cost and extra work for the retailer to recapture a very small cost and will not change the amount of waste and garbage seen in the city. As Edina builds more housing to bring more people into the city, garbage levels will increase as more people make more purchases. There will be neutral impact. I don't mean to sound cranky about this. Writing vs in person is hard to discern. I'm really neutral in my feelings about this. I personally, don't see it making an impact on the "environment/climate of the city as it grows bigger. More people, more waste, more behaviors that may or may not align with the initiative. Thanks for this opportunity to respond. I can't attend the in person session as I have a meeting one morning and still at the store during the other. 5/08/2023 09:16 AM We use paper bags to collect recycling as required. A charge for paper bags would discourage recycling because it creates a cost to comply where there is no higher price to throw recycling items in the trash. 5/11/2023 01:43 PM I use reusable bags all the time but not for food service. It's just not sanitary. Optional question (6 response(s), 0 skipped) Question type: Essay Question Filtering by: Are you an Edina resident or are you affiliated with a business? (Choose one) I-own-or-work-at-a-business-in- Edina (CLOSED) Carryout Bag Ordinance Feedback Survey : Survey Report for 13 April 2023 to 16 May 2023 Page 52 of 52 Exhibit 4 Edina Businesses Contacted and Interviewed Exhibit 4 Businesses Contacted and Interviewed Businesses Interviewed Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 1 Lunds & Byerlys 7171 S. France Avenue South Grocery Chain Brian Miller Manager 2 Cub Foods 6775 York Avenue South Grocery Chain Dawn Dailson Assistant Manager 3 Southdale Center 10 Southdale Center Retail Mall Chain (Simon)Judy Tullius General Manager 4 Eileen Fisher - Retail 3480 Galleria Retail Chain Jane Swanstrom Manager 5 Eileen Fisher - Corporation 2 Bridge Street, Irvington,NY Retail Chain Joanne Lossino Director,Omni Operations, Eileen Fisher Corporation 6 CVS 6905 York Avenue South Pharmacy Chain Jeff Hahn General Manager 7 Barnes & Noble Galleria Retail/Cafe Chain Elizabeth Store Manager 8 Jerry's Enterprises 5125 Vernon Avenue South Grocery Independent Steve Troska Manager Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 9 Jerry's Do It Best Hardware 5115 Vernon Avenue South Retail Independent Mike Rummel Manager 10 Serge +Jane 4532 France Avenue South Retail Independent Casey Carl Owner 11 Jerry's Do It Best Hardware 5115 Vernon Avenue South Retail Independent Mike Rummel Manager 12 R.F.Moeller Jeweler 5020 France Avenue South Retail Independent Bryan Moeller Owner 13 Bluebird Boutique 3909 W.50th Street Retail Independent Sacha Martin Owner 14 Harriet &Alice 3922 W.50th Street,Suite 105 Retail Independent Kate Bispala Owner 15 Truly Genuine Greetings & Gifts 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Carol Ann Stewart Owner 16 Muna Beauty Cosmetics 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Hamdi Guled Owner 17 Fit by Sha Sha 10 Southdale Center Retail Independent Marie Fields Owner 18 Parasole Restaurant Group 5032 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Donna Fahs Chief Operations Officer 19 Coccinella 4946 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Umut Kaplan Owner 20 Edina Grill 5028 France Avenue South Restaurant Independent Stephanie Shimp Marketing 1 Businesses Number Business Name Address Category Type Person Interviewed Position 22 D'Amico & Sons 3948 West 50th Street C Restaurant Independent Nino E'Andea Manager 21 The Hilltop 5101 Arcadia Avenue Restaurant Independent Tita Manager Businesses Contacted But Not Interviewed Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 1 Macy's Southdale Center 10 Southdale Center Retail Chain Erin Demas Manager Repeated attempts via phone and email;no response 2 Macy's 7253 South France Retail Chain Keri Jones Manager Email and phone calls;no response 3 Walgreen's Corporate Offices in Deerfield, Illinois Pharmacy Chain N/A Corporate Offices in Deerfield, Illinois Calls and email to corporate office;no response 4 Target Corporate Offices in Minneapolis, Minnesota Retail Chain N/A N/A Repeated phone calls and email messages to media relations and human resources;no response 5 Williams Sonoma 3512 Galleria Retail Chain Mary Bandarek Manager Said she would have to check with corporate office before speaking;no response to several follow up calls 2 Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 6 Jaxon Grey 3420 Galleria Retail Chain Adam Bevis Manager No response to numerous messages left at store 7 Big Bowl Lettuce Entertain You Corporate Offices in Chicago, Illinois Restaurant Chain Ethan Samson Deputy General Counsel Repeated voicemail messages after referral from human resources;no response 8 Starbucks 3939 West 50th Street Restaurant Chain Zachary Rothers Manager No response to messages left at store 9 Yumi Sushi 200 Southdale Center Restaurant Chain Angelene Lee Manager Said she had to check with corporate and would call back if authorized to participate in an interview 10 Stalk & Spade 3925 West 50th Street Restaurant Chain Lily Co-Found er No response to several voicemail messages 11 Coconut Thai 3948 West 50th Street Restaurant Independent Joe Owner Could not be reached 12 Wooden Hill Brewery 7421 Bush Lake Road Restaurant Independent Brittany Marketing Responded after two weeks when comment period had closed 13 Y&I Collection Southdale Center Retail Independent Nimo Osman Owner No response to messages 3 Business Number Business Name Address Category Type Individual Contacted Position Status 14 East West Girl 3931 Market Street Retail Independent Monica Owner No response to messages 15 Wooden Hill Brewery 7421 Bush Lake Road Restaurant Independent Brittany Marketing Responded after two weeks when comment period had closed 16 50th & France Business Assoc 3902 West 50th Street, Suite C Business Association N/A Max Musicant Director Emailed and declined to be interviewed; said they would support and promote to businesses 4 Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Comment on 2024 Commission Climate Action Menu Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Provide comment on Commission Climate Action Menu, to inform 2024 and beyond City Board and Commission work plans. EEC members should comment whether they think an action should be added or removed. The full list of climate actions can be found here: https://www.edinamn.gov/1779/Climate-Action by selecting the PDF titled "Climate Actions and Implementation" or as a PDF attached to this item. INTRODUCTION: Starting in 2023, Commissions have the option to choose from a menu of climate actions to add to their work plan proposal. T he menu was initially developed by Manager Hancock, and received comment from other staff liaisons. EEC comments on the list, and the final will be distributed to commissions via liaisons at June commission meetings. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2024 Commission Climate Action Menu Full List of Climate Actions StrategyActionPotential Council CBE 3‐2Explore the development of renewable energy program(s) which increase utilization of on‐site / in‐community renewable energy while creating benefit for low‐income community members. Example programs include City of Dubuque Low Income Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC), Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Community Solar for Community Action, and Texas Energy Poverty Research Institute Community Solar Program Model. Goal: 16,000 MWh clean energy delivered through programs annually by 2030.Study and ReportHS 1‐1Establish a communication campaign in alignment with the American Public Health Association Policy Number: 201711 and educate the public about the hazards of air pollution, including indoor air quality, and the steps individuals can take such as reducing and eliminating fossil fuel use, and available resources to reduce their exposure. Review and DecideHS 2‐5Create and make available an Emergency Response Toolkit offering tips and suggestions for residents to increase their emergency preparedness. Develop City‐based program to support individuals and families who cannot afford to purchase supplies for household emergency preparedness kits to adequately prepare their homes.Study and ReportLF 2‐3Promote and expand public education campaigns to encourage purchasing and supporting restaurants which use locally grown and produced food at the individual and institutional level (add targeting of disadvantaged, food insecure, and elder populations). Collaborate with under represented groups to identify culturally preferred foods and advocate for their cultivation and increased availability locally. Review and DecideTL 3‐4Identify underutilized paved areas and incentivize conversion to sustainable green space or infill development. Conversion focus should take into consideration neighborhood's greenspace, heat island mitigation, affordable housing, and bike/walk mobility needs and prioritize site utilization based on addressing the greatest needs at each site as determined through appropriate engagement with the community, particularly people traditionally under represented.Study and ReportBE 1‐7 Create a welcome packet for new businesses, which will provide information on all the energy efficiency improvement resources and opportunities. Report and RecommBE 4‐2 Partner with institutions and businesses within Edina to secure commitments to reduce operational greenhouse gas emissions in line with the goals of this Climate Action Plan, achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.Review and Decide BE 4‐5 Create an educational program to inform residential and commercial properties about renewable energy opportunities including technologies that eliminate on‐site fossil fuel use.Review and Decide or handout materiaBuildings & Energy  1‐5Partner with local organizations and businesses to educate the public and promote the adoption of energy efficiency habits like purchasing high‐efficiency equipment, turning the lights off in unused spaces and at night, having efficient indoor temperature control, and promote home energy audits among their staff and students.Report and Recommor Review and Deci(Event)Environmental Health HS 2‐2Add climate preparedness elements to public health programs already aimed at vulnerable populations and low‐income households and dedicate increased funding to accommodate demand for public health services among at‐risk populations. Study and ReportGS 2‐7Establish a policy to identify, create, and promote incentives to assist homeowners and households with low incomes to cover some of the cost of converting traditional lawns by planting pollinator friendly food gardens, permaculture, wildflowers, clover or native grasses in an effort to slow the collapse of the state’s bee population.Study and ReportGS 2‐8Develop educational and informational resources providing information on benefits of and strategies for reduced and repurposed lawn space including: native plantings, "carbon gardening" strategies for ornamental gardens, and produce gardens, tree profile rebuilding, elimination of synthetic fertilizer and pesticide use, high mow deck settings, use of biochar amendments, polyculture lawn mixture and other beneficial greenspace practices included in this CAP.Study and ReportLF 1‐4Study and report on options to incentivize and reward soil best management practice for urban lawns, gardens, landscaping, parks, open spaces, prairies, environmentally sensitive areas, and agricultural land uses.Study and ReportEdina Commission Climate Action Menu: Work Plan options LF 4‐2Establish a Green Business Refrigeration upgrade cost sharing incentive program providing a 25% matching grant for qualified buildings and applicants to switch to green refrigeration practices. Study and ReportLocal Food LF 1‐2Support existing school and community gardens and provide opportunities to expand community growing spaces with a focus on locating garden infrastructure to serve youth, immigrant, and people with lower incomes or who are experiencing food insecurity.  Community growing and garden spaces may include use of park space, unused city owned space, or public right of way/boulevard areas.  Program should prioritize conversion of impervious spaces to garden space and preservation/increase of overall green space benefit.  Provide on‐going promotion, communication, and education of the sites and opportunities including appropriate translated and accessible content.Review and Decide (Project)TL 1‐5Establish a branded communications campaign to promote increased alternative transportation use, with a particular focus on short distance trips (ie <2 miles) including school and other daily commutes.Report and RecommTL 4‐5Develop incentive and educational programs to transition lawn care companies and homeowners from using fuel‐burning lawn equipment (e.g., lawn mowers, blowers) to electric.Study and ReportW 1‐3Study and report on  a possible opt‐in water reduction program targeting water reduction goals of 20% or more per site.  Offer free technical resources to large institutions and businesses to identify specific opportunities for employees or customers to conserve water and incorporate water efficiency into internal operations.  Study and ReportW 1‐6Conduct a Water Conservation "challenge" campaign ask participants to reduce water consumption through water use behavior change strategies, irrigation system utilization, and replacement of fixtures like shower heads with WaterSense certified fixtures.Study and ReportWaste WM 1‐2Support collaborative consumption community projects, such as neighborhood compost projects, tool libraries, and repair cafes through mini‐grant programs.Study and ReportWM 2‐3Conduct an organics waste collection pilot project with a sample of City businesses to test the interest, methodology, and amount of commercial food waste that would need to be accommodated by a commercial organics collection program. Explore possible incentives for food retailers, restaurants, and institutions to participate in food waste reuse and recycling programs.Study and ReportWM 3‐2Explore a requirement that all waste be recycled or salvaged at large construction sites.Study and ReportWM 4‐5Promote and partner to support a Fix It Fair at the Library and create a resource list for reuse.Review and Decide  Click here to return to TOC The first few years after plan adoptfon are critfcal to its success. Establishing roles, both internal and external, and identffying funding will help establish the implementatfon phase of the plan and en- sure the community is on track to achieve its goals. This plan includes robust goals for significant GHG emission reductfons and addressing climate resilience. This vision requires commitment and integratfon of the CAP into City operatfons, functfons, and services. Ultfmately, however, successful implementatfon of this Climate Actfon Plan will require the support and commitment of Edina resi- dents and businesses. Climate Action Implementation is a Journey It is not possible to have all of the detailed answers on a decade’s worth of actfons at the beginning of the journey. The Climate Actfon Plan and its implementatfon are a journey. Although the actfons outlined in the CAP are designed to demonstrate a pathway for Edina to achieve its climate goals, there is much uncertainty in predictfng future technologies, costs, and regulatfons. For this reason, a full cost-benefit analysis of every actfon is not possible at this tfme. We antfcipate that refinement of detailed actfons will occur while they are rolled out. Accordingly, actfons are designed to provide guidance on intent but flexibility of details and design. Actfons which may modify/create policy or ordinances or which may have City expenses incurred should be antfcipated to go through the City Council process for approval. Implementation is For Everyone Implementatfon actfons are detailed items that should be completed in order to carry out the vision and strategies identffied in the plan. Some actfons will need to be led by City Council, City depart- ments, and/or the business community; and there are some things that households and individuals can do to make an impact. While many actfons will require City Council to amend a policy there will be opportunitfes for businesses, organizatfons, households, and individuals to support the City Coun- cil policy changes and provide input on and feedback on those policies. Ultfmately, achieving the visionary energy efficiency, renewable energy, alternatfve transportatfon, and climate resilience goals outlined in this plan will require engagement and a sense of responsibil- ity not only by the City of Edina leadership and government, but by the community itself as well. It is critfcal for all to remain engaged and actfve, advancing and advocatfng for actfons you feel are im- portant. Implementation Plan The following is a detailed list of Edina’s proposed actfons in support of each strategy outlined within each sectfon. The implementatfon plan includes an indicatfon of the following: GHG Reduction Potential This designatfon identffies the potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfon potentfal of the actfon (Note: GHG reductfon potentfal is just one variable of benefit—actfons with lower reductfon benefit should not necessarily be considered as low- er priority). Some Reductfon Potentfal: Moderate Reductfon Potentfal: High Reductfon Potentfal: Resilience: This designatfon identffies the potentfal scale or im- portance of the climate resilience support of the ac- tfon (Note: resilience potentfal is just one variable of benefit—actfons with lower resilience potentfal should not necessarily be considered as lower priori- ty). Some Resilience Support: Moderate Resilience Support: High Resilience Support: Equity: While it is important to view all actfons through an equity lens, those actfons with partfcular equity op- portunitfes, concerns, or consideratfons are identf- fied with the “Equity” designatfon: Phase: This designatfon identffies the antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: phase 1 within 1-3 years, phase 2 within 2-5 years, and phase 3 within 3- 7 years of CAP approval. Implementation Support Tools To support the City in its initfal implementatfon phase, the paleBLUEdot team has created a number of tools including: • Implementatfon and Monitoring Matrix • Net Zero Energy Building Guide: https:// palebluedot.llc/edina-net-zero-energy-guide • Solar Ready Guide: https://palebluedot.llc/edina -solar-ready-guide • Electric Vehicle (EV) Ready Guide: https:// palebluedot.llc/edina-solar-ready-guide • Example Climate Actfon Policies and Ordinances The paleBLUEdot team has assembled example policies and ordinances supportfng some of the strategies and actfons included in the Edina Cli- mate Actfon Plan. The examples can be found on the following webpage: https://palebluedot.llc/edina-cap-policy- examples Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strate-Actfon CC 1: Continue to Build Internal Capacity for Support of Climate Action Plan Implementation Contfnuing to build internal capacity will be important to help establish the CAP as a priority in- tegral to internal operatfons as well as fostering connectfons to community partners, business- es, and individuals through outreach, educatfon, special projects, and service delivery. CC 1- 1 The City Manager will work with staff to develop a year 1 implementatfon plan that specifies a work se- quence and tfmeline for implementatfon tasks, estfmates necessary funding and staffing resources, and outlines an accountability process, to be presented to the Energy & Environment Commission for com- ment by the end of March 2022. Progress updates will be reported to the Edina Energy & Environment Commission and City Council on a semi-annual basis. 1 Administratfon CC 1- 2 Establish clear guidance and directfon for the partfcipatfon in and support of the CAP implementatfon actfons by all City of Edina departments. Low Low 1 Administratfon CC 1- 3 Establish a City "CAP Team" comprised of staff representatfves from all key City departments. The task of the CAP Team should be to meet regularly to support the initfal and on-going prioritfzatfon and imple- mentatfon of annual implementatfon actfons and projects and to support reportfng and progress updates. Medium Medium 1 Sustainability CC 1- 4 Establish and implement a policy to review existfng and future City of Edina policy and ordinance changes as well as building and zoning variance requests against the goals, strategies, and actfons of this Climate Actfon Plan to ensure alignment of changes with this plan. Low Low Equity 1 Planning CC 1- 5 Fund and support sustainability staffing required to support the implementatfon of this Climate Actfon Plan (see Implementatfon Matrix for example staff needs). Medium Medium Equity 1 Administratfon CC 1- 6 Review Climate Actfon Plan implementatfon progress and impacts on a regular basis (1-2 year cycle). Re- view should include development of an updated community wide and municipal operatfons GHG invento- ry. Strategies and actfons should be reviewed for implementatfon progress and for contfnued appropri- ateness. Based on the review, adjust, add, and remove detailed CAP actfons as appropriate. Low Low 1 Sustainability This sectfon includes foundatfonal recommendatfons which apply to multfple Sectors. The following actfons support the long-range implementatfon of the CAP including: Building Internal Capacity, External Support, and Funding. Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strate-Actfon CC 2: Facilitate External Support Needed for Climate Action Plan Imple- mentation City staff and elected officials will not be able to implement this plan without robust support from community members and coordinatfon with jurisdictfonal, instftutfonal, and organizatfonal partners. Some best practfces/recommendatfons/ideas are outlined below: CC 2- 1 Establish the Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) as a primary community member body to sup- port the implementatfon of the CAP. Commission’s annual work plans should include support of the im- plementatfon of the Climate Actfon Plan; supportfng City staff in any relevant departments; receiving up- dates on City CAP projects and progress; being provided with opportunity to comment on identfficatfon of annual CAP implementatfon prioritfes, projects, and budgets; and providing input on plan adjustments as needed. Equity 1 City Council CC 2- 2 Establish a designated City Council representatfve and EEC representatfve partfcipant in the City’s internal CAP Team in support of CAP implementatfon. 1 City Council CC 2- 3 Establish a coordinated communicatfon and educatfon campaign supportfng the communicatfon and edu- catfonal needs of each of the CAP sectfons. The campaign should also look to help community members: •Understand climate change in general, antfcipated impacts, and the functfon and importance of implementfng a Climate Actfon Plan. •Understand why change at the individual, community, City, and business level needs to occur, •The role of individuals, households, and businesses in making change •How to make those changes correctly, and •What the benefit/incentfve to them might be; for example, artfculatfng that switching to solar energy and or an electric bus fleet might help reduce bills Low Medium Equity 1 Communicatfons & Informatfon Technology CC 2- 4 Contfnue and expand sustained outreach and engagement efforts that seek to build and maintain direct relatfonship with under-resourced, traditfonally marginalized, and climate vulnerable communitfes within Edina. Medium Equity 1 Sustainability CC 2- 5 Establish jurisdictfonal partnerships that advance CAP strategies to advance and accelerate actfon. This can include government entftfes like the Hennepin County, 9 Mile Creek Watershed District, the State of Minnesota; utflitfes like Xcel Energy; instftutfons like Edina Public Schools; Edina businesses, and commu- nity groups. Low Medium Equity 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strate-Actfon CC 3: Maintain appropriate funding to support plan implementation Funding the implementatfon of the CAP will require reallocatfon/reconsideratfon of existfng City funds, raising new City funds, and identffying outside resources and funding opportunitfes. Some funds will need to be dedicated toward long-term support like staffing, while other fund- ing will be on a project-by-project basis. See also Strategy CE 4 in Climate Economy. CC 3- 1 Maintain a budget and identffy funding sources for staff dedicated to the implementatfon of the CAP. 1 Administratfon CC 3- 2 Identffy a budget necessary to support projects on an annual basis as per the detailed actfons outlined in the Climate Economy sectfon of the plan and climate actfons. 1 Administratfon CC 3- 3 Utflize no-cost technical assistance offerings as available. 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon TL 1: Decrease community wide VMT by 7% by 2030 TL 1- 1 Revise street design standards and prioritfze funding to align with Vision Zero strategies to create safe streets for people walking, biking, micro-mobility optfons, and riding transit while also accommodatfng vehicles. Provide bicycle and pedestrian safety and skills training to all school-aged children in Edina with an accompanying program to educate parents and all interested adults. Low Medium Equity 1 Engineering (Transportatfon) TL 1- 2 Accelerate building on-street and off-street protected bike lanes, sidewalks, crosswalks, and other walking infrastructure in high-need areas and fill connectfvity gaps as identffied in the City's Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan. Low Low Equity 1 Engineering (Transportatfon) TL 1- 3 Partner with instftutfons and businesses within Edina to secure commitments to implement transit de- mand management (TDM) strategies and practfces to support the goals of this Climate Actfon Plan includ- ing increased utflizatfon of public transit and alternatfve carbon free mobility, increased vehicle electrifica- tfon, and decreased vehicle miles. Strategies to pursue include promotfng and incentfvizing public transit use, bicycle programs, shared van services for employees, facilitate carpooling, telecommutfng optfons, parking buyback programs, and collaboratfng with Metro Transit to promote the Guaranteed Ride Home program. High Medium Equity 1 Sustainability TL 1- 4 Review and recommend policies necessitatfng a TDM Plan and/or a transit component with all types of development and redevelopment. Review and implement substantfve requirements associated with these TDM Plans to support the goals of this Climate Actfon Plan, potentfally including TDM escrow ac- counts, transit passes, preferentfal parking for car-poolers, and other measures High Low Equity 2 Planning TL 1- 5 Establish a branded communicatfons campaign to promote increased alternatfve transportatfon use, with a partfcular focus on short distance trips (ie <2 miles) including school and other daily commutes. Low 2 Communicatfons & Informatfon Technology TL 1- 6 Conduct Actfve Routes to Schools audits for all Edina elementary and middle schools to identffy infrastruc- ture improvements that would enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and encourage trips to school on non-pollutfng modes of transportatfon. Establish tfmeline and plan for implementfng all recommended improvements. Low Low Equity 2 Engineering (Transportatfon) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon TL 2: Double public transit commuter ridership from 3.3% to 6.6% by 2030 TL 2- 1 Advocate with Metro Transit to improve efficiency, convenience, frequency, and reliability of bus service as well as improved bus shelter infrastructure. Collaborate with Metro Transit and Hennepin County to improve public transit infrastructure including dedicated lanes, dedicated bus routes, and create high-frequency rapid transit in corridors to improve "tfme equity / parity" of the route transit tfme with what it would be to drive a car. Prioritfzatfon to be given on routes serving the city’s employment centers and areas with higher shares of people with mobil- ity challenges. high Medium Equity 1 Engineering (Transportatfon) TL 2- 2 Preserve and enhance affordable housing, especially near bus service, to prevent displacement of vulnerable populatfons. Medium Medium Equity 1 Affordable Hous- ing TL 2- 3 Work with Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County, and other local governments to identffy, and promote increased commuter and light rail train optfons capitalizing on existfng infrastructure in the community and the Southwest Light Rail Transit line. Medium Medium Equity 1 Sustainability TL 2- 4 Establish an ordinance limitfng combustfon engine idling. Support ordinance adherence through a public educatfon and enforcement campaign. Medium 1 Sustainability TL 2- 5 Work with Metropolitan Council and other local governments to: a ) Establish a method for pro- jectfng the lifecycle carbon emissions of land use and transportatfon investments. Include con- sideratfon of embodied energy, operatfons and maintenance. b ) Align regional mode share tar- gets with carbon reductfon targets and encourage the development of mode share targets spe- cific to the varying community needs and transit infrastructure around the region. Medium 2 Sustainability TL 2- 6 Explore optfons to secure funding and provide transit passes to all youth, households with low incomes, and individuals with restricted mobility. Low Low Equity 3 Engineering (Transportatfon) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon TL 3: Increase average population per developed acre by 4% by 2030 TL 3- 1 Contfnue to advocate for growth through appropriate increased density: a ) Prioritfze elements of the MPCA GreenStep Citfes best practfces that have the greatest potentfal for reducing car- bon emissions. b ) Give priority to state and local goals for carbon emissions reductfon and cli- mate change preparatfon in growth management decisions. c ) Maximize benefits and consider impacts to communitfes of color and low-income populatfons when making growth manage- ment decisions. d ) Protect natural resources and increase access to nature and open space within the community and development nodes. Medium Medium Equity 1 Planning TL 3- 2 Eliminate parking minimums to reduce surface parking and instftute new parking pricing models to maintain 85% utflizatfon (performance-based parking, off-street parking tax, dynamic pricing, etc.) Low Equity 1 Planning TL 3- 3 Contfnue to integrate mixed use development close to neighborhoods to provide walkable destf- natfons for daily needs. Update and conduct new small area plans for business and mixed use nodes while exploring "15 minute city" concepts and strategies (50th/France, Southdale, Cahill, etc.). Medium Medium Equity 1 Planning TL 3- 4 Identffy underutflized paved areas and incentfvize conversion to sustainable green space or infill development. Conversion focus should take into consideratfon neighborhood's greenspace, heat island mitfgatfon, affordable housing, and bike/walk mobility needs and prioritfze site utfli- zatfon based on addressing the greatest needs at each site as determined through appropriate engagement with the community, partfcularly people traditfonally under represented. Low high Equity 2 Planning TL 3- 5 Assess whether or not to purchase and preserve greenspace in and surrounding the city by quantffying the equitable, environmental, and economic benefits, along with the costs of main- taining and owning the property. Medium Equity 2 Sustainabilit TL 3- 6 Incentfvize the development of brownfields, vacant land, and abandoned buildings within the City. Identffy unused industrial-zoned areas and explore rezoning to increase viability of devel- opment opportunitfes. Offer tax or other incentfves to those who agree to implement such green technology as green roofs, LEED certffied buildings, solar arrays, geothermal heatfng, etc. Low 3 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon TL 3- 7 Allow and encourage the constructfon of accessory dwelling units ("ADU") to increase rental op- portunitfes in both established neighborhoods and new development. This will add additfonal housing optfons for the City’s workforce, seniors, families with changing needs, and others for whom ADUs present an affordable housing optfon. Medium Low Equity 3 Affordable Hous- ing TL 4: Increase battery electric vehicle (BEV) utilization to 25% of communi- ty wide rolling stock (from approximately 357 vehicles to 9100 vehicles community-wide). TL 4- 1 Create an Electric Vehicle (EV) Actfon Plan. An EV Actfon Plan should: 1) address increased public access to chargers, 2) identffy locatfons for chargers in commercial areas, 3) identffy DC Fast Charging locatfons 4) explore charging infrastructure technologies including streetlight integra- tfon and smart cable technologies, 5) address barriers to charging at homes and rental proper- tfes (such as households without garages), 6) identffy strategies to increase use of EVs in car sharing programs, and 7) assess the potentfal to partner with third-party EV charging statfon providers to lower program and constructfon costs. high Equity 1 Engineering (Transportatfon/ Sustainability) TL 4- 2 Implement an "EV Ready" building ordinance that requires new developments to have wiring capacity to charge electric vehicles and establish minimum EV parking requirements. high 1 Sustainability TL 4- 3 Encourage and incentfvize purchase of electric vehicles and installatfon of electric vehicle charg- ing capacity. Incentfves and rebates should prioritfze support for low income households and opportunitfes to increase equity. high Equity 1 Sustainability TL 4- 4 Partner with fleet operators and transit providers to work towards a goal that buses and fleets based and operatfng in Edina, including school buses, be 50% electric by 2030 and 100% by 2035. Work with transit agencies and bus companies to take advantage of federal transit grant opportunitfes to purchase new electric vehicles. Medium 2 Sustainability TL 4- 5 Develop incentfve and educatfonal programs to transitfon lawn care companies and homeown- ers from using fuel-burning lawn equipment (e.g., lawn mowers, blowers) to electric. Low Low Equity 2 Parks & Recrea- tfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon TL 4- 6 Collaborate with waste haulers, or require in waste hauler agreements, to deploy alternatfve fueled vehicles – biodiesel/electric vehicles used in solid waste collectfon and disposal. Low 3 Health Division TL 5: Convert municipal operations gasoline and e10 gasoline vehicles and equipment within municipal fleet to EV's. Achieve 40% by 2030 and 100% by 2040 TL 5- 1 Adopt a policy requiring 100% of new light-duty City fleet vehicles to be electric vehicles, or use no/low carbon alternatfve fuels by 2030, and 100% of new medium and heavy-duty city fleet vehicle purchases to be electric, use no/low carbon alternatfve fuels, or meet high-efficiency standards, by 2040. Medium 1 Sustainability TL 5- 2 Conduct a municipal fleet inventory and EV transitfon Implementatfon plan. Effort to identffy opportunitfes for electrifying, right-sizing, and improving overall efficiency of vehicles to meet CAP Goals. Include implementatfon recommendatfons to incorporate EV's through right-tfming purchases with a planned vehicle-replacement schedule. Low 1 Sustainability TL 5- 3 Introduce a policy to replace City off-road and lawn equipment with electric and low-carbon fuel alternatfve optfons at the tfme of replacement with traditfonal internal combustfon engine (ICE) as optfonal requiring proof of need. Low Low 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 1: Improve total community wide residential, commercial, educational, and industrial building energy efficiency by 15% for electricity and 15% for Natural Gas by 2030. BE 1- 1 Partner with established Energy Audit/Energy Efficiency Program(s) to accomplish significant residentfal energy efficiency improvements and make the program accessible to all Edina resi- dents, including reduced partfcipatfon costs for low income households. The program should offer building envelope tests, infrared thermal scanning, light weatherizatfon projects, LED light bulb replacement. Additfonally, offer building operatfons and behavioral suggestfons, as well as track carbon, energy, and financial savings Goal: 460 households annually. High Medium Equity 1 Sustainability BE 1- 2 Work with Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy, Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and other part- ners to establish commercial/industrial energy efficiency audit and upgrade program. Develop specific energy efficiency programs for hard-to-reach segments of commercial propertfes (e.g., commercial rental, restaurants, affordable multffamily housing, schools). Program to be similar Minnesota Chamber of Commerce’s EnergySmart commercial energy savings program with en- hanced energy efficiency targets meetfng City of Edina CAP Goals. Goal: 15% of commercial/ industrial buildings by 2030 achieving a 20% efficiency increase per locatfon. High Low Equity 1 Sustainability BE 1- 3 Require City-financed projects to meet an energy efficiency standard, like Sustainable Buildings 2030 (SB2030), LEED Gold, Enterprise Green Communitfes, the 24 Natfonal Green Building Standard ICC/ASHRAE 700, or an equivalent certfficatfon. Consider requiring projects receiving PUD, CUP or other zoning actfon to meet the energy efficiency standard. Low Low 1 Sustainability BE 1- 4 Create a Utflity Services rebate program that provide incentfves for residentfal and commercial/ industrial buildings based on energy use reductfon in additfon to demand reductfon and which encourage efficiency which exceed existfng building energy code (e.g., lightfng controls, outdoor lightfng, energy recovery ventflatfon, carbon dioxide controls, custom rebate). Program to also support modificatfons to existfng constructfon installatfons of qualifying age to remedy existfng constructfon limitatfons where the required R-value cannot be met. Program to prioritfze sup- port for low income households. Medium Equity 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are iden-Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 1- 5 Partner with local organizatfons and businesses to educate the public and promote the adoptfon of energy efficiency habits like purchasing high-efficiency equipment, turning the lights off in unused spaces and at night, having efficient indoor temperature control, and promote home energy audits among their staff and students. Low Low 1 Sustainability BE 1- 6 Establish a clean energy fund to invest in energy efficiency and renewable energy projects. De- velop and expand financing tools such as Clean Energy Works and commercial Property As- sessed Clean Energy that are broadly accessible to households and building owners, including rental propertfes, throughout the community. Remove financial barriers to building retrofits, including limitfng property tax increases due to completed energy projects as well as reducing any other potentfal burdens on rental propertfes when making upgrades. Medium Medium Equity 1 Sustainability BE 1- 7 Create a welcome packet for new businesses and residents, which will provide informatfon on all the energy efficiency improvement resources and opportunitfes. Low Low Equity 2 Economic Devel- opment BE 1- 8 Promote and offer incentfves for improving energy efficiency (e.g., insulatfon, energy-efficient windows, electric heat pumps) in newly constructed commercial propertfes. New constructfon incentfves shall support measures for projects that exceed code requirements. Prioritfze build- ing sites within neighborhoods with higher portfons of people of low income and higher climate vulnerabilitfes. Medium Low Equity 2 Sustainability BE 1- 9 Explore, create, and promote incentfves for cool roofs and green roofs on new and existfng buildings in order to mitfgate urban heat islands. Prioritfze building sites within neighborhoods with higher heat island impacts. Low Medium Equity 2 Sustainability BE 1- 10 Implement an energy challenge competftfon to motfvate instftutfonal partners. Establish annual targets of households/businesses to reach (use average kWh use per premise by neighborhood maps created by Xcel to target high users). Medium 2 Sustainability BE 1- 11 Work with partner organizatfons to promote building retro-commissioning and operatfon and maintenance practfces that improve affordability, comfort, indoor air quality and energy effi- ciency in all commercial and multffamily buildings. Low Low Equity 2 Sustainability BE 1- 12 Work with utflitfes to incentfvize efficiency incentfves for the fit-out of commercial tenant space and the replacement of inefficient equipment before end-of-life and facilitate the bulk purchas- ing of efficient equipment at all commercial/industrial building types. Medium Equity 2 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 1- 13 Establish a performance ratfngs/labeling program for all homes listed for sale or rent so that owners, tenants and prospectfve buyers can make informed decisions about energy costs and carbon emissions. Ratfng program to require Energy Audit/Energy Efficiency Program partfcipa- tfon. Medium Equity 3 Sustainability BE 1- 14 Promote and offer incentfves for improving residentfal energy efficiency in new constructfon (e.g., insulatfon, energy-efficient windows, electric heat pumps). New constructfon incentfves shall support measures for projects that exceed code requirements. Medium Low Equity 3 Sustainability BE 1- 15 Deploy residentfal technologies that start with enabling renters to partfcipate in energy efficien- cy, such as Wi-Fi-enabled “smart” thermostats, while pilotfng new business models that tackle tenant-landlord split issues. Low Equity 3 Sustainability BE2: Increase adoption of high performance building construction tech- nology, achieving 5% Net Zero households and 1% Net Zero commercial properties community wide by 2030 BE 2- 1 Launch a platiorm and training program to share best practfces, providing training, and promote the City’s Net Zero Energy Guide and Solar-Ready Checklist. Low Low 1 Sustainability BE 2- 2 Build market demand for net-zero energy buildings through incentfves, educatfon, demonstra- tfon projects, partnerships and recognitfon. Low 2 Sustainability BE 2- 3 Following the completfon of an energy audit overview of all City facilitfes, identffy potentfal sites for Net Zero retrofit/renovatfon. Low 2 Sustainability BE 2- 4 Develop competftfve Request for Proposal for effectfve and innovatfve Net Zero pilot projects. Focus on "Net zero building in every neighborhood" to establish visibility of strategies within the community. RFP should encourage high quality mixed use redevelopment on infill propertfes and existfng surface parking lots along transit oriented development corridors. RFP's should focus on equity, affordability, livability, and compliance/support of Climate Actfon Plan goals. Medium Medium Equity 3 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE3: Reduce share of population living in high energy poverty from 29% to 12% by 2030 BE 3- 1 Create a community-wide Clean Energy Equity plan to support low-income residents and small organizatfons in purchasing renewable energy. Low Low Equity 1 Sustainability BE 3- 2 Explore the development of renewable energy program(s) which increase utflizatfon of on-site / in-community renewable energy while creatfng benefit for low-income community members. Example programs include City of Dubuque Low Income Solar Renewable Energy Credit (SREC), Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Community Solar for Community Actfon, and Texas Energy Poverty Research Instftute Community Solar Program Model. Goal: 16,000 MWh clean energy delivered through programs annually by 2030. High High Equity 1 Sustainability BE 3- 3 Use grant, state, and city funding to implement an income-based payment system to allow low and fixed income residents to partfcipate in energy efficiency and weatherizatfon program(s) at little to no cost. Medium High Equity 1 Sustainability BE 3- 4 Explore additfonal optfons for building improvement programs that would reduce energy con- sumptfon for vulnerable populatfons and those living under high energy burden through added insulatfon, air sealing, passive energy systems, heat pumps, and higher efficiency equipment. Low Medium Equity 2 Sustainability BE 4: Achieve 10% residential and commercial and industrial building "fuel switching" from on-site fossil fuel combustion to less carbon inten- sive, or carbon neutral sources by 2030. BE 4- 1 Coordinate and promote a residentfal and small business "Electrificatfon and Energy Efficiency/ Weatherizatfon" group purchase campaign annually to help reduce the costs of energy efficient no/low carbon heatfng systems such as air source heat pumps and ground source heat pumps through volume purchasing power. Program design to focus on improved equity (residentfal and commercial) in its implementatfon and explore strategies to support local small business contractors such as being set up to enable small contractors to collaborate or having a competf- tfve "marketplace" approach with more than one contractor to choose from. NOTE: Actfon may be implemented in combinatfon with the renewable energy group purchase program actfon. Goal, 300 households and 75 businesses annually. High Low Equity 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 4- 2 Partner with instftutfons and businesses within Edina to secure commitments to reduce opera- tfonal greenhouse gas emissions in line with the goals of this Climate Actfon Plan, achieving car- bon neutrality by 2050. Medium 1 Sustainability BE 4- 3 Identffy opportunitfes for facilitfes to repurpose waste to energy without burdening residents. Low Equity 1 Public Works (utflitfes) BE 4- 4 Identffy, create, and promote incentfves for switching away from natural gas heatfng to renewa- ble electricity, ground source heat pumps, or solar thermal for residentfal and commercial and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) for appropriate commercial/industrial sites. High Low Equity 2 Sustainability BE 4- 5 Create an educatfonal program to inform residentfal and commercial propertfes about renewa- ble energy opportunitfes including technologies that eliminate on-site fossil fuel use. Low 3 Sustainability BE 5: Increase renewable energy (distributed and purchased) from 1.6% to 17% of citywide residential and commercial electric use by 2030 BE 5- 1 Coordinate and promote a residentfal Solar Group Purchase Campaign annually to help reduce the costs of solar installatfon through volume purchasing power. Program design to focus on improved equity in its implementatfon and explore strategies to support local small business solar installers such as being set up to enable small installers to collaborate or having a competf- tfve "marketplace" with multfple installer optfons. NOTE: Actfon may be implemented in combi- natfon with the electrificatfon and energy efficiency group purchase program actfons. Goal, 150 households and 75 businesses annually. High Equity 1 Sustainability BE 5- 2 Identffy the "Solar Top 100" commercial/industrial propertfes within the city and produce de- tailed solar feasibility assessments for each site. Assessments to include potentfal solar genera- tfon and economic performance and return on investment estfmates, informatfon on financing and ownership models, and next step resources. Provide solar assessment reports to propertfes and conduct an informatfonal workshop to assist building owners and businesses in understand- ing the assessments and next step potentfal. "Solar Top 100" assessment effort could be re- peated annually, partfcularly through 2025. Low 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 5- 3 Coordinate and promote a commercial/industrial Solar Group Purchase Campaign annually to help reduce the costs of solar installatfon through volume purchasing power. Group purchase campaign could include/focus on propertfes identffied in the "Solar Top 100" assessment effort and should include both direct purchase/ownership as well as 3rd party ownership optfons like Solar Lease and Power Purchase Agreements. Program design to explore strategies to support local small business solar installers and strategies to support local workforce development. Goal: 2,000 KW installed annually. High Equity 1 Sustainability BE 5- 4 Promote green power purchase optfons such as those provided by Xcel Energy's "Renewable Connect" and "Windsource". Collaborate with utflitfes on promotfon and educatfon of available optfons. Goal: 220 households and 50 businesses annually. High Equity 1 Sustainability BE 5- 5 Support the development of community solar projects that benefit all residents, partfcularly communitfes of color and low-income populatfons. Equity 2 Sustainability BE 5- 6 Establish a Solar Ready Ordinance to require all commercial and multf-family buildings to be solar ready and to require on-site solar for all commercial propertfes receiving City funding and incentfves. See City's Solar Ready Guidelines. Low Low 2 Sustainability BE 5- 7 Partfcipate in statewide policy discussions to expand the market in Minnesota for renewable energy, including solar, wind, geothermal, biogas and biomass, and remove barriers to wide- spread partfcipatfon in renewable energy programs like community solar. 2 Sustainability BE 5- 8 Explore the viability of all commercially available optfons for energy storage (battery) and devel- op appropriate energy storage programs for all customer types to reduce peak demand, support electric grid reliability and improve the effectfveness of solar and other renewable energy op- tfons. 2 Sustainability BE 5- 9 Organize educatfon and outreach programs to promote rebates and tax credits available for en- ergy efficiency projects. Outreach should focus on effectfvely communicatfng with households of lower income and BIPOC owned businesses. Low Low Equity 3 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon BE 6: Improve total municipal building energy efficiency by 17% for elec- tricity and 17% for natural gas by 2030 BE 6- 1 Introduce a policy that requires all new and existfng municipal buildings to be built to meet or exceed IGCC code and State of Minnesota B3 energy goals. Require new and existfng municipal buildings without solar PV installatfons in place or planned to install cool roof or green roofing. Require all new constructfon or major renovatfon projects to use the City's Net Zero Energy Building Guide and Checklist to explore opportunitfes to advance towards Net Zero Energy. In- vite County, School District, and other public agencies located within the City to partfcipate in City's energy efficiency policy effort. Medium Low 1 Sustainability BE 6- 2 Conduct a City Facilitfes Energy Audit on all buildings and sites (including outdoor lightfng con- version to Dark Sky approved LED lightfng). Use results from City Facilitfes Energy Audit to prior- itfze City Facilitfes Capital Improvement Plans (CIPS) and maintenance improvements to achieve energy efficiency goals. Establish a tfmeline for improvements with implementatfon occurring within 5 years of completfon of energy audits. Medium Low 1 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 6- 3 Implement the Environmental Preferable Purchasing (EPP) Policy within municipal operatfons. Low 2 Sustainability BE 6- 4 Conduct a occupancy and plug load energy efficiency study of primary city owned facilitfes and establish a "Plug Load and Occupancy Energy Efficiency Guide" outlining operatfonal practfces to advance the City's energy efficiency goals for City facilitfes. Provide training to all existfng city employees and provide on-going training to all new City hires. Low 2 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 7: Achieve 25% municipal building thermal “fuel switching" from on- site fossil fuel combustion to less carbon intensive, or carbon neutral sources by 2030 Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) BE 7- 1 Conduct an "Electrificatfon Assessment and Actfon Plan" to outline actfons and prioritfes for electrificatfon of all City facilitfes to move towards zero on-site fossil fuel combustfon. Work with regional energy partnerships to implement Plan for all City facilitfes and establish a sched- ule for improvements (such as hot water and space heatfng appliance replacement). Include new and existfng buildings, explore strategies to address electricity storage, and create a case study to highlight and share challenges, solutfons, and lessons learned to share with the broader community. Medium Low 1 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 7- 2 Establish a policy requiring all new municipally owned buildings to be 100% electric (or zero on- site fossil fuel combustfon). Medium Low 1 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 8: Increase renewable energy (distributed and purchased) from 0.2% to 100% of city operations electricity consumption by 2030. BE 8- 1 Conduct a City Facility Solar Feasibility and Master Plan study to explore the feasibility of on-site solar for all city facilitfes. Study should explore a range of ownership optfons including purchase and third party ownership (such as Power Purchase Agreements) and should include exploratfon of micro-grid and solar+storage optfons for improved facility resilience. Study should also iden- tffy strategies such as community solar subscriptfons combined with Renewable Energy Credit purchases, to achieve renewable energy at sites determined to be inappropriate for on-site so- lar to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2030. Low Low Equity 1 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 8- 2 Install solar on all City buildings and sites, where feasible based on the findings and recommen- datfons of the City Facility Solar Feasibility and Master Plan study by 2027. Explore implementa- tfon of micro-grid, solar+storage and other optfons for improved facility resilience. Explore in- cluding City Facility solar purchases in community-wide commercial solar group purchase cam- paigns. Medium Medium 1 Engineering (facilitfes) BE 8- 3 Explore use of the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program (or another optfon such as a tax-exempt bond or performance contractfng) to finance all possible municipal solar projects and renewable energy purchases through the utflity. 2 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) WM 1: Decrease total per capita municipal solid waste handled 5% by 2030 WM 1- 1 Coordinate with the school district to establish paths towards Zero Waste program. Program to include zero waste curricula, family content, training, volunteer program connectfons, as well as zero waste strategies for school facilitfes. Low Equity 1 Community En- gagement WM 1- 2 Support collaboratfve consumptfon community projects, such as neighborhood compost pro- jects, tool libraries, and repair cafes through mini-grant programs. Low Low Equity 1 Parks & Recrea- tfon WM 1- 3 Explore optfons for waste hauling improvements supportfng CAP goal achievement, including modificatfons to City's existfng licensure process and requirements as well as organized waste hauling strategies. Low Equity 1 Health Division WM 1- 4 Create a space where items can be donated at the end of the school year or after graduatfon and hold an annual event for children's things and toys to be given away. Equity 2 Parks & Recrea- tfon WM 1- 5 Eliminate petroleum-based, single-use products through phasing out the use of single-use plas- tfcs including plastfc bags by 2025. Require food service retailers to use re-usable, biodegrada- ble, compostable or recyclable packaging and utensils (including for take-out). Explore the feasi- bility of establishing a reusable takeout container service. Low 2 Health Division WM 1- 6 Establish a Zero Waste policy for City operatfons that outlines increasing incremental annual waste reductfon goals chartfng a path to Zero Waste. Policy to require that outside users of City facilitfes also follow Zero Waste policy and will modify the event permit applicatfon to require the inclusion of recycling and compostfng at events. Low 3 Sustainability WM 1- 7 Establish a Universal Zero Waste Ordinance, requiring all property owners (including City build- ings and parks) to provide recycling and compost collectfon services and requiring businesses to use these services. Low 3 Sustainability WM 2: Achieve 70% organics landfill waste diversion by 2030 (from 5,775 tons to 10,250 tons diverted through organics collectfon) WM 2- 1 Make City worksites a model for organics compostfng by developing a collectfon program for City buildings (owned and leased) and park spaces. Low 1 Engineering (facilitfes) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) WM 2- 2 Require that compost be used as a soil amendment for public and private constructfon projects that disturb the soil cover by a set amount. Low 1 Engineering WM 2- 3 Conduct an organics waste collectfon pilot project with a sample of City businesses to test the interest, methodology, and amount of commercial food waste that would need to be accommo- dated by a commercial organics collectfon program. Explore possible incentfves for food retail- ers, restaurants, and instftutfons to partfcipate in food waste reuse and recycling programs. Low 1 Health Division WM 2- 4 Expand curbside and availability of other compostfng optfons for single family and multf-family residents and businesses. Explore optfons for low-cost or free compost/organics collectfon or drop off partfcularly for people of low income. Promote and educate on the value and methods for compostfng. Low 1 Health Division WM 2- 5 Develop compost captains on each block/ neighborhood to educate neighbors on the benefits of compostfng, gardening, creatfng "cool yards". Medium 2 Health Division WM 2- 6 Explore requiring large new buildings to provide facilitfes for disposing organics. Low 2 Health Division WM 2- 7 Combat food waste by encouraging retailers and restaurants to donate, reduce, reuse, or com- post their unsold food, creatfng “zero-waste sectfons” where products are sold close to their expiratfon dates, and designatfng “zero-waste coaches” to raise awareness among staff and help manage products reaching the end of their marketable life. Edible unsold products shall be do- nated. When not edible, organic waste shall be composted through City's organics collectfon vendor. Equity 3 Health Division WM 3: Increase recycling from 32% to 35% of total MSW handled by 2030 WM 3- 1 Coordinate with public partners to ensure recycling is provided and promoted in all schools, City buildings, public housing, and public spaces. Include coordinatfon on recylcing educatfon and communicatfons to improve reductfon of contaminatfon. Low 1 Health Division WM 3- 2 Explore a requirement that all waste be recycled or salvaged at large constructfon sites. 2 Buildings WM 3- 3 Work with the Planning Department to require adequate space/chutes in multf-family buildings for recycling and organics making sure recycling is as convenient as garbage. 2 Planning Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) WM 3- 4 Explore establishing or expanding requirements for recycling and organic waste collectfon for multf-family residentfal buildings, and commercial/industrial buildings. Promote, educate and advocate for equal access to organics collectfon as well as collectfon of other common items typically requiring drop off at the recycling center to support partfcipatfon by all, including indi- viduals with limited mobility. Low Equity 3 Health Division WM 3- 5 Expand consumer educatfon (e.g. host community forums and provide direct outreach) on sus- tainable consumptfon, materials management, available services, incentfves, and facilitfes as well as proper recycling, compostfng, and source reductfon methods. 3 Health Division WM 4: Increase diversion of potential recoverables by 15% by 2030 (decreasing from 14.7% of city mixed waste to 12.5%) WM 4- 1 Promote and explore partnership with clothing businesses, reuse non-profits and textfle recy- cling businesses to create a Clothing Reuse and Recycling pilot project to advance zero waste textfles within the City. Low Equity 1 Health Division WM 4- 2 Promote and partner with existfng waste audit or diversion assistance programs for businesses. Program to support businesses in establishing tracking and reportfng waste streams, identffy reductfon, diversion, beneficial use opportunitfes, identfficatfon of potentfal financing sources, and connect businesses with energy audit and other resources in support of full CAP goals. Goal: 30 business waste audits completed annually with businesses engaged in measuring and divertfng waste. Low 1 Health Division WM 4- 3 Establish a policy or ordinance expanding or requiring textfle reuse and recycling based on out- comes of the Clothing Reuse and Recycling pilot project. Low 2 Health Division WM 4- 4 Conduct a Beneficial Use Study to identffy greatest beneficial use opportunitfes present in cur- rent City solid waste streams. Study to estfmate potentfal return on investment and identffy job and economic development potentfal associated with opportunitfes. Research/identffy pilot project opportunitfes to explore capture of benefit. 2 Economic Devel- opment WM 4- 5 Promote and partner to support a Fix It Fair at the Library and create a resource list for reuse. Equity 3 Health Division Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are iden-Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon W 1: Promote increased water conservation citywide with a targeted re- duction of 7.5% by 2030 W 1- 1 Advocate for updated building codes to require water conservatfon measures (e.g., grey water infrastructure, water-efficient irrigatfon systems, natfve and drought-resistant landscaping) in new constructfon and renovatfons. Low Medium 1 Sustainability W 1- 2 Evaluate the potentfal to update the City's Green Building Program to include installatfon of rain- water collectfon systems at City facilitfes for graywater uses, and investfgate opportunitfes for graywater reuse at existfng and new City facilitfes and propertfes. Implement graywater systems identffied capable of reducing energy/water demand in other areas (for example, watering ur- ban tree canopy to reduce heat island effect and air conditfoning needs). Low 1 Sustainability W 1- 3 Facilitate reductfon of water use by top customers annually through an opt-in water reductfon program targetfng water reductfon goals of 20% or more per site. Offer free technical resources to large instftutfons and businesses to identffy specific opportunitfes for employees or customers to conserve water and incorporate water efficiency into internal operatfons. Program can be coordinated with the City's Waste Audit and Diversion Assistance program. Goal: 30 business water use audits completed annually with customers engaged in measuring and reducing water consumptfon. Low Low 1 Engineering (environment) W 1- 4 Evaluate opportunitfes for real-tfme water and energy metering that may help customers better understand and reduce their water and energy consumptfon. Low Low 1 Public Works W 1- 5 Implement a policy to require installatfon of rainwater collectfon systems and WaterSense water efficient fixtures and appliances at all City facility projects and all projects receiving $50,000 or more in City tax abatement, financing or funding. Provide informatfon and technical assistance to projects as needed. Low Low 3 Planning W 1- 6 Conduct a Water Conservatfon "challenge" campaign ask partfcipants to reduce water consump- tfon through water use behavior change strategies, irrigatfon system utflizatfon, and replace- ment of fixtures like shower heads with WaterSense certffied fixtures. Low Low 3 Engineering (environment) W 1- 7 Consider rate design structures that incentfve reductfons in water consumptfon. Include utflity services and capacity support to implement income-based payment plan. Include educatfon and engagement plan to raise awareness about change and water efficiency. Low Low Equity 3 Finance Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon W 2: Reduce GHG emissions associated with wastewater City Wide by 25% per capita by 2030 W 2- 1 Partner with Xcel or the PUC to study ways to off-peak or tfme water, sanitary, and storm utflity electric use to provide grid services or increase the preferentfal use of renewable energy, or pro- vide reliable power with grid controlled batteries, rather than diesel or natural gas generators. Low 1 Engineering (environment) W 2- 2 Negotfate or contract with Metropolitan Council Environmental Services for renewable, biodi- gestfon, or other wastewater treatment offset technology to offset 100% of Edina wastewater treatment demand carbon emissions by 2030. Medium 1 Engineering (environment) W 3: Mitigate and adapt to the projected increased flood hazards and im- pacts due to climate change W 3- 1 Monitor chemical snow and ice management treatments and update regulatfons as needed to respond to changing ice, freeze/thaw, and rain events in a way that supports a healthy water- shed while maintaining an appropriate level of service and snow clearing; within city owned propertfes. Low 1 Public Works W 3- 2 Increase frequency of street sweeping for priority lakes and creek sub-watersheds based on the 2015 City of Edina Street Sweeping Plan. Promote the “Adopt-a-Drain” program to contfnue to improve removal of debris from storm drains and waterways. Consider renewable natural gas, or electric sweeper at next equipment replacement plan. Low 1 Public Works W 3- 3 Implement strategies to mitfgate stormwater impacts due to development and redevelopment of propertfes currently exempted from stormwater management requirements. Medium 1 Engineering (environment) W 3- 4 Fund and construct the Morningside Flood Infrastructure Project, and complete preliminary con- cepts, prioritfze and schedule mitfgatfon projects for next 3-4 major flood risk areas. Medium 2 Engineering (environment) W 3- 5 Prioritfze managing stormwater before it enters the sewer system through a combinatfon of overland flow, detentfon, and infiltratfon strategies (for example, permeable surfaces). Medium 2 Engineering (environment), Parks, Sustaina- bility Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon W 3- 6 Complete ordinance amendment that reduces allowable impervious surface of R-1 single family zoning. Target: 50% allowable impervious surface decrease. Medium 2 Planning W 3- 7 Promote, share and create additfonal "Actfons you can take" fact sheets for businesses, home- owners, rental property owners, and renters. Establish an accessible outreach and engagement plan to reach at-risk propertfes during infrastructure projects. Incorporate other resources such as "landscaping for absorptfon" practfces (like natfve plantfngs, rain gardens, and bioswales) and MyRain Ready. Low Equity 2 Engineering (environment) W 3- 8 Build more permeable parking lots and driveways and use more recycled materials with con- crete. Identffy, implement, and promote pilot projects to provide examples of permeable and recycled paving systems. Medium 3 Engineering (Transportatfon) W 4: Update design standards and municipal plans to meet projected cli- mate change flood mitigation requirements W 4- 1 Prepare a flash flood risk map, or modify existfng City of Edina flood mapping tools, to identffy areas within City that are partfcularly vulnerable to flash flood impacts based on current and projected climate change impacts. Train and educate emergency responders about this risk. Create and implement a mitfgatfon and response plan. Share and promote the informatfon de- veloped by the flash flood risk map, partfcularly among vulnerable populatfons and neighbor- hoods. Medium 1 Engineering (environment) W 4- 2 Enhance stormwater system plans and infrastructure to handle an increase in severe weather events based on climate change projectfons rather than historic trends. High 2 Engineering (environment) W 4- 3 Work with FEMA to update flood zone maps. Update watershed management plans with cur- rent understanding of climate change related weather patterns to identffy propertfes vulnerable to flooding and help prepare property owners to implement adaptatfon actfons. High Equity 2 Engineering (environment) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are iden-Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon LF 1: Increase production of local food and its resilience to climate shocks, particularly serving low income and food insecure individuals. LF 1- 1 Review ordinances and development regulatfons remove barriers to and promote urban agricul- ture. Low 1 Planning LF 1- 2 Support existfng school and community gardens and provide opportunitfes to expand communi- ty growing spaces with a focus on locatfng garden infrastructure to serve youth, immigrant, and people with lower incomes or who are experiencing food insecurity. Community growing and garden spaces may include use of park space, unused city owned space, or public right of way/ boulevard areas. Program should prioritfze conversion of impervious spaces to garden space and preservatfon/increase of overall green space benefit. Provide on-going promotfon, commu- nicatfon, and educatfon of the sites and opportunitfes including appropriate translated and ac- cessible content. Medium Equity 1 Parks & Recrea- tfon LF 1- 3 Partner with schools and other organizatfons to create sustainable gardening programs at public and private schools and at locatfons that to serve youth, immigrant, and people with lower in- comes or who are experiencing food insecurity. Promote local food productfon through these partnerships, funding, and educatfonal programs. Low Equity 1 Parks & Recrea- tfon LF 1- 4 Incentfvize and reward soil best management practfce for urban lawns, gardens, landscaping, parks, open spaces, prairies, environmentally sensitfve areas, and agricultural land uses. Low 1 Planning LF 1- 5 Update code to provide incentfves or require developers to preserve topsoil and provide space for backyard or community gardens. Low Equity 2 Planning LF 1- 6 Establish a public Food Forest by adding edible trees, shrubs, and plantfng regionally natfve veg- etables to existfng public landscaping including boulevard and right of way areas. Select an ex- istfng property for a pilot project. Medium Equity 2 Parks & Recrea- tfon LF 1- 7 Collaborate with partners to provide educatfonal resources such as featuring films, "fact sheets" and educatfonal content. Use these partnerships to create field trips for students and others to visit farms and urban agriculture sites to see food productfon, meet farmers and animals and promote consideratfon of farming and local food productfon as a career. Communicatfons, events, and field trips to prioritfze racial/cultural diversity among partfcipants. Equity 2 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) LF 1- 8 Allow community gardens or urban farms on vacant land in all zoning districts, except industrial, to increase the availability of locally produced food for all residents. Low Equity 3 Planning, Parks LF 2: Increase access to local food, particularly serving low income and food insecure individuals LF 2- 1 Conduct a detailed Food Security Assessment to determine food insecurity conditfons within the City, areas with limited access to full service grocery stores and markets (partfcularly within are- as of higher vulnerable populatfons), identffy areas within the City for improvement, and estab- lish detailed strategies to increase food security within City. Medium Equity 1 Health Division LF 2- 2 Encourage and support the acceptance of Electronic Benefits Transfer (formerly food stamps) at all markets and groceries, and educate EBT/SNAP users about using their benefits to purchase local food. Explore the development of a "Double SNAP Dollar" program at all Farmers Markets to increase access to locally grown fresh produce for low income households. Low Equity 1 Health Division LF 2- 3 Promote and expand public educatfon campaigns to encourage purchasing and supportfng res- taurants which use locally grown and produced food at the individual and instftutfonal level (add targetfng of disadvantaged, food insecure, and elder populatfons). Collaborate with under rep- resented groups to identffy culturally preferred foods and advocate for their cultfvatfon and in- creased availability locally. Low Equity 2 Health Division LF 2- 4 Analyze existfng Municipality purchasing and procurement policies and explore creatfng a policy preferring purchasing locally grown foods. Medium 3 Parks & Recrea- tfon LF 3: Reduce food waste, achieve a 25% reduction in food waste communi- ty-wide by 2030 LF 3- 1 Collaborate with partners to create, incentfvize, and promote a business network of sourcing, distributfng and marketfng cosmetfcally imperfect produce partfcularly those which provide affordable produce to low income and food insecure community members. Medium Equity 1 Health Division Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are iden-Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) LF 3- 2 Promote Restaurant, Food Service and Household Best Management Practfces o Reduce Food Wastage in the Kitchen (pre-consumer) o Reduce over-purchasing of food o Reduce prep waste and improperly cooked food o Consider secondary uses for excess food o Ensure proper storage techniques o Reduce Plate Scraping Wastage (post-consumer) – Modify menu to increase consumer satfsfactfon and reduce food left uneaten – Modify serving sizes and garnishes – Encourage guests to order/request and take only the food they will consume - Go Trayless at buffets and school/instftutfonal cafeterias Low Low 2 Health Division LF 3- 3 Establish partnerships and a program to improve logistfcs of sourcing and transportfng surplus food from events, schools, restaurants, grocery stores and other sources to providers and part- ners capable of effectfvely distributfng surplus to disadvantaged, food insecure, and elder popu- latfons. Low Equity 2 Health Division LF 4: Reduce the amount that the community's food consumption contrib- utes to climate change LF 4- 1 Create collaboratfve partnerships with community-based organizatfons and affinity groups, in- cluding low-income populatfons and communitfes of color, to: a ) Promote healthier, low-carbon diets. b ) Encourage local food productfon and purchase including at local restaurants. c ) Sup- port affordability and access to healthier foods through neighborhood food buying clubs and co- ops. d ) Reduce food waste. Low Low Equity 1 Community En- gagement LF 4- 2 Establish an Green Business Refrigeratfon upgrade cost sharing incentfve program providing a 25% matching grant for qualified buildings and applicants to switch to green refrigeratfon prac- tfces. Medium Low 2 Sustainability LF 4- 3 Include healthy, low-carbon food choices and food waste in public and business outreach efforts. Work with partners to support efforts to encourage plant-based diets, including Meat- less Monday campaigns. Low Low 3 Parks & Recrea- tfon Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon GS 1: Increase tree cover from 35.9% to 39.5% by 2030 and 43% by 2040 GS 1- 1 Explore the integratfon of trees into a Stormwater Credit Program to increase trees and manage stormwater. Low 1 Engineering (environment) GS 1- 2 Conduct a Solar and Tree Compatfbility study to actfvely identffy the best sites in the city for tree canopy expansion as well as the best locatfons for solar pv installatfons. Following study, work to direct and encourage tree plantfng and solar pv development in areas identffied. Low Low 1 Forestry GS 1- 3 Identffy strategic locatfons for increased tree plantfng capable of meetfng long-term canopy goals and develop long range implementatfon program based on the City's 2021 Ground Cover, Tree Canopy, and Carbon Sequestratfon Study and the goals of this CAP. Establish incentfves for tree plantfng that ensure all socio-economics groups have access to tree and nature while achieving tree canopy goals. Prioritfze tree replacement programming in neighborhoods based on factors outlined in the study including those with low income households, vulnerable popula- tfons, street and boulevards with less than 30% sidewalk/curb length shade coverage, and neighborhoods that will be most impacted by urban heat island effect and Emerald Ash Bore loss. Low Medium Equity 1 Forestry GS 1- 4 Update City’s Landscape ordinance to include a minimum tree coverage per lawn area or per impervious surface coverage for all new constructfon or expansion projects. Explore optfons for decrease of turf grass/lawn coverage and increase of wildflower/prairie grass coverage require- ments. High Equity 1 Planning GS 1- 5 Update current tree preservatfon ordinance requirements to protect tree root systems and large legacy trees during constructfon. Explore optfons for increases in legacy tree protectfon and in- creases in performance based requirements of tree plantfng within parking lots. Medium 1 Forestry GS 1- 6 Establish a Greenspace Property Tax Credit / or Saleable/tradeable greenspace credits to incen- tfvize property owners to increase green infrastructure, greenspace, and carbon sequestratfon in line with the goals of this CAP. Medium 2 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon GS 1- 7 Prioritfze plantfng and preservatfon of natfve species of plants and trees and species of plants and trees adaptfve to climate change on public and private property through educatfon, incen- tfves and other promotfonal programs. Ensure that landscaping requirements artfculated in the zoning code include the preservatfon of the maximum possible number of existfng trees, the use of natfve plantfngs and the preservatfon of natural areas whenever possible. Low 2 Sustainability GS 1- 8 Update the City’s approved street tree guide and landscape design standards to establish a Cli- mate Adaptfve Plantfng list for tree and plant species appropriate for a future local climate. Also include a list of invasive species and resources for identfficatfon and removal. Use guide for all city owned propertfes and promote its use for residentfal and commercial propertfes. Medium 3 Forestry GS 1- 9 Update the City's Ground Cover, Tree Canopy, and Carbon Sequestratfon Study every 2 to 5 years to evaluate progress on the City's greenspace and ground cover goals and to adjust imple- mentatfon plans. Low 3 Parks & Recrea- tfon GS 2: Increase pollinator supportiveness of lawns and grasslands in City of Edina and achieve a 10% turf replacement with native or climate adaptive grasses and wildflowers by 2030 (250 acres converted) GS 2- 1 Complete a Land Conversion Opportunity Study supportfng the ground cover goals included in this CAP. Analyze public and private property for unused turf and impervious areas, and create a Ground Cover Conversion Implementatfon plan to convert to natfve plant and pollinator restora- tfon areas, permaculture areas, wetlands, shrub, tree coverage or urban agriculture uses with goals by census tract. Include goals and an implementatfon plan to meet or exceed the CAP goals for tree, natfve pollinator area, and lawn conversion for City owned propertfes. Goals should be weighted by heat island, water runoff, and equity needs. Identffy incentfve opportuni- tfes and establish an outreach campaign. Medium Equity 1 Community De- velopment (planning) GS 2- 2 Remove and ease lawn/grass requirements in ordinances. Medium 1 Community De- velopment (planning) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon GS 2- 3 Install roadside pollinator vegetatfon that creates effectfve barriers to prevent drifting of air pol- lutants to adjacent schools and residences. Prioritfes should be given to locatfons with increased air quality and micro heat island impacts and elevated flash flood potentfal. Medium Equity 1 Public Works GS 2- 4 Manage city-owned natural areas to enhance and maintain diverse natfve communitfes, in- crease green infrastructure, implementatfon of best practfces for stormwater management, in- creased plant diversity, and improved pollinator-friendly habitat. Low 1 Parks & Recrea- tfon GS 2- 5 Manage city-owned lawn/turf areas to enhance and maintain diverse natfve communitfes, in- creases turf replacement with natfve wildflower and prairie grasses, increased plant diversity, improved pollinator-friendly habitat, and Carbon Gardening practfces including eliminatfon of synthetfc fertflizer and pestfcide use, high mow deck settings, use of biochar amendments, and polyculture lawn mixture. Low 1 Parks & Recrea- tfon GS 2- 6 Establish a policy to require the use of natfve plants in landscaping at City-owned propertfes. Contfnue natural vegetatfon conversion for passive park areas. Add 110 Acres of natfve plant and pollinator restoratfon area on City Property by 2040. Medium 2 Parks & Recrea- tfon GS 2- 7 Establish a policy and Identffy, create, and promote incentfves to assist homeowners and house- holds with low incomes by covering some of the cost of convertfng traditfonal lawns by plantfng pollinator friendly food gardens, permaculture, wildflowers, clover or natfve grasses in an effort to slow the collapse of the state’s bee populatfon. Medium Equity 2 Sustainability GS 2- 8 Develop educatfonal and informatfonal resources providing informatfon on benefits of and strat- egies for reduced and repurposed lawn space including: natfve plantfngs, "carbon gardening" strategies for ornamental gardens, and produce gardens, tree profile rebuilding, eliminatfon of synthetfc fertflizer and pestfcide use, high mow deck settings, use of biochar amendments, poly- culture lawn mixture and other beneficial greenspace practfces included in this CAP. Low 2 Sustainability GS 2- 9 Establish and effectfvely manage natfve-habitat corridors along trails and utflity easement areas to restore and maintain landscape connectfvity. Low Equity 2 Parks & Recrea- tfon Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon GS 3: Reduce heat island effect through citywide “dark” impervious sur- face reduction of 10% by 2030 and 20% by 2040 (250 acres reduced by 2030, 500 acres reduced by 2040) GS 3- 1 Develop a "Green Roof" / "Green Wall" pilot project to educate on and exhibit heat island mitf- gatfon strategies and measure potentfal for effectfveness. Identffy city building with low solar PV prioritfzatfon/feasibility for inclusion as pilot project locatfon. Alternatfvely, pilot program could be advertfsed for submission by City of Edina residents, businesses and neighborhoods for potentfal sites to be considered for pilot project selectfon. Preference should be given to sites serving low income or at risk communitfes with high heat island impact potentfal. Low Medium Equity 1 Engineering (facilitfes) GS 3- 2 Develop a "Cool Roof" / "Cool pavement" pilot project to educate on and exhibit heat island mitfgatfon strategies and measure potentfal for effectfveness. Identffy city building with low solar PV prioritfzatfon/feasibility for inclusion as pilot project locatfon. Alternatfvely, pilot pro- gram could be advertfsed for submission by City of Edina residents, businesses and neighbor- hoods for potentfal sites to be considered for pilot project selectfon. Preference should be given to sites serving low income or at risk communitfes with high heat island impact potentfal. Low Medium Equity 1 Engineering (facilitfes) GS 3- 3 Promote the expansion of tree canopy in urban heat islands or areas that need air conditfoning such as schools. Prioritfze efforts based on City's 2021 Ground Cover, Tree Canopy, and Carbon Sequestratfon Study. Collaborate with school district, regional agencies, or instftutfons to identf- fy and implement a pilot project, including community educatfonal and interpretfve content. Low High Equity 1 Sustainability GS 3- 4 Explore development of green roof incentfves (demonstratfon projects, voluntary programs, in- centfvized program, ordinance / policy) to meet long-range dark impervious surface reductfon goals. Examples of incentfve programs have been developed by the Climate Protectfon Partner- ship Division in the U.S. Environmental Protectfon Agency’s Office of Atmospheric Programs. Low Medium 2 Sustainability Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strate-Actfon GS 3- 5 Evaluate on-going pilot programs for cool paving materials to determine whether the City should establish a cool paving policy. Low Medium Equity 2 Engineering (Transportatfon) GS 3- 6 Explore creatfon of a Heat Island Reductfon Incentfve and Award program prioritfzing areas of the City with the highest heat island coefficients as identffied in the City's 2021 Ground Cover, Tree Canopy, and Carbon Sequestratfon Study. Incentfves and awards from governments, utfli- tfes, and other organizatfons can be an effectfve way to spur individual heat island reductfon actfons. Incentfves might include below-market loans, tax breaks, product rebates, grants, and giveaways. Awards can reward exemplary work, highlight innovatfon, and promote solutfons across the public and private sectors. Low Medium Equity 3 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon HS 1: Educate, engage, and empower the public on health and safety risks of climate change impacts HS 1- 1 Establish a communicatfon campaign in alignment with the American Public Health Associatfon Policy Number: 201711 and educate the public about the hazards of air pollutfon, including in- door air quality, and the steps individuals can take such as reducing and eliminatfng fossil fuel use, and available resources to reduce their exposure. Campaign to use a variety of communica- tfon avenues to reach diverse audiences - partfcularly the City’s top vulnerable populatfons iden- tffied in the City's Climate Vulnerability Assessment - include multfple methods such as events at ADA compliant easily accessible locatfons, art, mail, public forums, digital surveys, social me- dia, websites, etc. Provide easy-to-understand materials and provide childcare and ensure the availability of translators and interpreters. Medium Equity 1 Health Division HS 1- 2 Engage both school districts and private schools to explore the possibility of developing and im- plementfng an environmental educatfon-integrated curriculum. Low Equity 1 Community En- gagement HS 1- 3 Engage with the Public Health Department and other health related agencies to include health impacts of climate change in Health Impact Assessments and annual reportfng while sharing in- formatfon about climate risks to health. Medium 1 Health Division HS 1- 4 Improve resilience through community co-created educatfon, public and community lead ini- taitfves. Increase awareness of climate change impacts and emphasize the need for household and neighborhood preparatfon. Create actfvitfes and messages that capture public interest Pro- vide opportunitfes for actfon and informatfon on city programs including transportatfon without cars (biking, walking, transit), tree plantfng, climate friendly yards, etc. Low Equity 2 Sustainability HS 1- 5 Support capacity of neighborhood and community groups to implement climate mitfgatfon and adaptatfon initfatfves. Low 2 Community En- gagement HS 1- 6 Encourage the Edina School district to re-establish Go Green committee where each school sends a rep to monthly meetfngs to report on projects and share ideas. Also encourage schools have Green teams for teachers, students and parents to promote actfons in line with CAP Goals such as bike riding, ride sharing , electric charging statfons for EVs, gardens for food, etc. Low 2 Community En- gagement Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon HS 2 : Assist the City’s vulnerable populations in preparing for climate change impacts. HS 2- 1 Make air conditfoned public facilitfes available during poor air quality days and high heat days. Prepare for public buildings to be used in different ways, both in lower-impact ways, such as seniors using the library to cool down during hot June days, and as safe-havens during acute emergencies. High Equity 1 Health Division HS 2- 2 Add climate preparedness elements to public health programs already aimed at vulnerable pop- ulatfons and low-income households and dedicate increased funding to accommodate demand for public health services among at-risk populatfons. Medium 1 Health Division HS 2- 3 Establish a protocol for providing assistance to vulnerable populatfons including low-income populatfons, communitfes of color, older adults and people with disabilitfes that may face finan- cial strain caused by climate hazards, such as higher utflity bills, educatfng on environmentally friendly, cost effectfve alternatfves to air conditfoning, identffy funding sources to support those populatfons, and provide linkage between those populatfons and supportfve resources. Include outreach to understand how the City can better assist them in preparing to meet needs. Design of outreach and protocol should include youth leadership and a convened group representfng the different vulnerable communitfes in Edina to place their needs be at the center of the devel- opment of the protocol and process. Medium Equity 1 Health Division HS 2- 4 Provide travel vouchers to vulnerable individuals to use during high heat emergencies since lack of transportatfon is highly correlated to heat vulnerability. High Equity 2 Health Division HS 2- 5 Create and make available an Emergency Response Toolkit offering tfps and suggestfons for resi- dents to increase their emergency preparedness. Develop City-based program to support indi- viduals and families who cannot afford to purchase supplies for household emergency prepared- ness kits to adequately prepare their homes. Medium Equity 2 Health Division Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon HS 2- 6 Ensure public safety staff is properly trained to recognize and respond to physical and behavioral signs of heat related illness. Conduct climate change impacts and adaptatfon training for law enforcement, fire, first responders, and utflitfes. Promote equity in hazard mitfgatfon, and emergency response and recovery actfvitfes, and consider populatfons most vulnerable to weather-related emergencies in all plans and exercises, including evacuatfon routes, transporta- tfon for vulnerable populatfon groups, shelter in place locatfons, back-up power operatfons, ex- tended access to fuel/power sources and drinking water, etc. Medium Equity 2 Health Division HS 3: Establish and update plans to address climate risks and impacts HS 3- 1 Develop, test, train, and update emergency response plans that address hazards likely to be- come more frequent or intense as the climate changes, including flood and extreme heat. Plan for projected increases in weather-related emergencies, especially high-heat days, and the re- sultfng potentfal for increased violence, mental illness, chemical dependency and addictfon. Co- ordinate with County to update emergency plans with specific climate change-related emergen- cy materials including press release templates; informatfon on cooling/heatfng centers, flood and extreme heat, etc. High 1 Health Division HS 3- 2 Establish a policy that requires city infrastructure projects and capital budgets incorporate cli- mate risk and vulnerability analysis and adaptatfon plans to ensure that future spending contrib- utes to resilience. High 1 Sustainability HS 3- 3 Create preparedness and recovery plans for all City divisions. After weather-related emergency events, assess response to identffy effectfveness, deficiencies and resources needed to build future resilience. Medium 2 Health Division HS 3- 4 Conduct a health impact assessment to identffy areas with potentfal elevated health risks associ- ated with climate impacts including unsafe levels of air pollutfon from vehicle traffic and other sources. Prioritfze use of the data to implement modifying zoning or other improvements. Medium Equity 2 Health Division HS 3- 5 Coordinate with the County to develop a debris management plan to support response to se- vere storm events and flooding. High Equity 2 Public Works Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strate-Actfon HS 4: Strengthen community response capacity and social support net- works HS 4- 1 Encourage cross-sector collaboratfon (government, business, agency, tribes, non-profit organiza- tfons) between entftfes working on climate change mitfgatfon and adaptatfon/resiliency. Low 1 Sustainability HS 4- 2 Form a team to develop actfon plans to address climate-related mental health resilience at the individual, neighborhood and community level. Develop projectfons and plans for addressing future mental health needs in Edina. Provide culturally-appropriate resources for health profes- sionals about the potentfal mental health impacts of climate change including seasonal affectfve disorder (SAD) and grief counseling. Medium Equity 1 Health Division HS 4- 3 Support, leverage create relatfonships with, and enhance community networks and connectfons for those who require special attentfon, such as people who are elderly, homebound, disabled, isolated, or those likely to be in need of financial assistance during or after extreme weather events (heat, cold and heavy precipitatfon). High Equity 2 Community En- gagement HS 4- 4 Build capacity and leadership within communitfes most vulnerable to climate change impacts by promotfng, supportfng and leveraging community-specific strategies, projects and events. High Equity 2 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon CE 1: Promote economic investment that aligns with the Climate Economy and the goals of the Climate Action Plan CE 1- 1 Partner with State and County waste management and local and regional recycling centers to establish a program to encourage and promote new entrepreneurial businesses advancing the use of recycled material feed stock, the utflizatfon of organics compostfng, and "Circular Econo- my" concepts which further the goals of the CAP. Low Low Equity 1 Economic Devel- opment CE 1- 2 Establish a Clean Energy business incubator to support the establishment of innovatfve energy efficiency and renewable energy business models within the community. Model should priori- tfze the development of opportunitfes for people with low income, under represented, and peo- ple with vulnerabilitfes. Incubator services should include a public communicatfons campaign on the services and benefits of partfcipatfng in an incubator, and how to become engaged. Incuba- tor should consider a requirement for start up businesses receiving support to provide service/ products to under represented populatfons. Medium Medium Equity 1 Economic Devel- opment CE 1- 3 Foster small business and green business development, partfcularly those which support the goals of this Climate Actfon Plan such as those that increase resources or utflizatfon of renewa- ble energy, energy efficiency, quality of life for vulnerable populatfons, improved resilience of homes and local businesses, etc. Low Low Equity 2 Economic Devel- opment CE 1- 4 Promote Edina as an environmentally friendly destfnatfon by highlightfng the businesses that are taking steps to reduce resource consumptfon (Green Business Recognitfon program). Low Low 2 Economic Devel- opment CE 1- 5 Explore optfons to collaborate to create and promote a market for Certffied Compost from local sources using City of Edina organic waste. Low Low 3 Health Division CE 2: Promote workforce development for success in the climate economy CE 2- 1 Review and suggest potentfal policy changes to identffy current and potentfal future need for affordable housing including scenarios antfcipatfng climate immigratfon and migratfon poten- tfals. Affordable housing locatfons should be located with easy access to climate economy jobs and meet the Buildings and Energy, Transportatfon and Land Use, Climate Adaptatfon, Health and Safety, and other goals of this CAP plan. Medium Equity 1 Affordable Hous- ing Click here to return to Sectfon Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon CE 2- 2 Engage with local green jobs training providers to coordinate strategic planning and encourage programs to develop local workforce capacity and assess, train, and place local residents to per- form energy retrofits, solar pv installatfons, and other green improvements. Low Low Equity 1 Community De- velopment CE 2- 3 Collaborate to establish a jobs training program focused on building workforce with deconstruc- tfon skills and capacitfes. Job training program should focus on establishing job skills and place- ment for low income individuals. Low Low Equity 1 Buildings CE 2- 4 Collaborate with the School District, local community colleges, unions, local non-profit/ community organizatfons, and employers to establish a paid Green Jobs apprentfceship and in- ternship program. Program to facilitate the hiring of program graduates through the promotfon and subsidized internship placement with employers within the City of Edina. Explore establish- ing a cost sharing / resource sharing component with the businesses benefitfng from intern- ships. Program to prioritfze internship candidates from households with low income and people from under represented populatfons. Medium Low Equity 2 Sustainability CE 3: Encourage commercial properties and businesses and institutions to plan for climate resilience CE 3- 1 Collaborate with partners to ensure redundancy in telecommunicatfons and broadband net- works to protect commerce and public safety in the event of natural or manmade disasters. Medium 1 Sustainability CE 3- 2 Provide assistance vetting contractors offering energy, waste, and water audits and efficiency upgrades, renewable energy installatfons, and EV readiness assessments or equipment installa- tfons to local businesses. Contractor vetting should include clear indicatfon of important equity consideratfons such as "small locally owned business", "Woman owned business", and "BIPOC owned business". Include informatfon on financing optfons such grants and low/no cost assis- tance. Equity 1 Sustainability CE 3- 3 Support climate resilience of local economy by preparing water, road, utflitfes, and other public infrastructure for increased demands from climate change based on Edina Climate Risk and Vul- nerability Assessment, Emergency Management Plan, and State climate change data and projec- tfons. Medium 1 Engineering Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon CE 3- 4 Create an online assessment of business’ vulnerability/resiliency, including the following topics and content: Incentfves or Tax breaks available Zero Waste improvements Climate Resiliency Energy: efficiency and renewables Emergency Response Low 2 Sustainability CE 3- 5 Facilitate in-person discussions with community businesses to build relatfonships to identffy in- dustry specific economic impacts Edina businesses (partfcularly small businesses and disadvan- taged group businesses) face based on the climate change based on risks and hazards identffied in this report, the Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment, and the City/County emergency management response plan. Collaborate with businesses to Identffy economic resilience strate- gies in response to those economic vulnerabilitfes and conduct outreach to industry groups and public-private partnerships to promote private sector investment addressing them. Medium Equity 2 Economic Devel- opment CE 3- 6 Work with community businesses to explore the creatfon of an incentfvized “buy local” cam- paign to enhance resilience of small local businesses. Low Equity 2 Economic Devel- opment CE 3- 7 Make sure key business infrastructure is recognized in the City and County’s general hazard mitf- gatfon plan and emergency response plan. Medium 2 Health Division CE 4: Establish dedicated sustainable financing for the City’s climate action implementation CE 4- 1 Advocate climate actfon related funding at State level including support of new state multfmodal transportatfon funding source for transit, bicycle and pedestrian services and facilitfes and statewide carbon tax or carbon cap generatfng new decarbonizatfon funding sources. Medium Medium Equity 1 Sustainability CE 4- 2 Identffy a sustainable funding source for the goals and actfons of this CAP in support of low- income residents such as energy efficiency projects, mobility and low-carbon transportatfon, and high quality local food programs. Medium Medium Equity 1 Sustainability Click here to return to Sectfon GHG Potentfal scale of greenhouse gas emissions reductfons: Resilience: Potentfal scale or importance of the climate resilience support: Equity: Those actfons with partfcular equity opportunitfes, concerns, or considera- tfons are identffied under “Equity”. Phase: Antfcipated general initfatfon tfmeframe of the actfon: Some Resilience Support Moderate Resilience Support High Resilience Support Some GHG Reductfon Moderate GHG Reductfon High GHG Reductfon 1 (1-3 years) 2 (2-5 years) 3 (3-7 years) Action GHG Resilience Equity Phase City Lead Strategy Actfon CE 4- 3 Establish a policy that accounts for all energy efficiency and renewable energy operatfonal cost savings of City buildings and fleets. All savings to be invested into a Climate Actfon Fund as one source of financing for the City's climate actfon efforts. Medium Medium 1 Sustainability CE 4- 4 Conduct a study to establish an Urban Forestry Product program to sell wood products, and dedicate funds to climate actfon plan strategy implementatfon. Revenue sources could include: sale of Ash tree logs removed as a part of the City's EAB management plan, selling tree storm debris and tree trimming waste to waste-to-energy plant or pelletfzer, selling sugar taping rights to Maple, Birch, and Walnut trees located on City property and right of way responsibility, etc. Low Equity 1 Forestry CE 4- 5 Add a Carbon Impact Fee to all new development as a percentage of the building permit fee. Additfonal funds raised to be used for Climate Mitfgatfon and Adaptatfon implementatfon. Pro- jects may apply for a refund if they install on-site renewable energy system and provide docu- mentatfon that demonstrates the system will offset a minimum of 40% of the site’s energy con- sumptfon, with sliding scale refunds provided for projects offsetting over 40%. High High Equity 2 Sustainability CE 4- 6 Establish a policy to utflize TIF (Tax increment Financing) to incentfvize Mitfgatfon and Adapta- tfon actfons in line with the goals of the CAP. Medium Low Equity 1 Sustainability CE 4- 7 Explore the potentfal of collaboratfons with donors, philanthropists, and non-profit foundatfons to develop a Climate Actfon and Equity Fund for the City of Edina. Low Medium Equity 2 Sustainability CE 4- 8 Explore adoptfng a tax financing mechanism such as a "resilience penny" property tax increase of $0.01 per $100 of assessed value and dedicate additfonal funds for climate mitfgatfon and climate adaptatfon strategies. Funds may be used directly, or may be used as a repayment source for a bond issue. High High Equity 2 Sustainability Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Other From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:2024 Workplan Development Kickoff Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Begin drafting 2024 EEC workplan INTRODUCTION: Commission Member Handbook is a resource to guide workplanning process. Commissions develop proposed work plans from June - August. Commission approves proposed workplan in September. Chair presents proposed work plan to Council in October. Staff present recommendations to Council in November. Council approves work plan in December. Date: June 8, 2023 Agenda Item #: VII.D. To:Energy and Environment Commission Item Type: Report and Recommendation From:Grace Hancock, Sustainability Manager Item Activity: Subject:Monthly call for communication requests Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Submit any communications requests to staff liaison for processing INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description EEC Communication Channels Energy and Environment Commission Communication Guidelines Communication Channels These channels are used by Edina’s Communication Department and can be accessed by the EEC. While turnaround time is included, it is recommended that requests be made as early as possible for planning purposes. There will be a call for communication requests as a standing agenda item at each EEC meeting. The staff liaison will coordinate requests with Communications Director, Jennifer Bennerotte. Type Content Materials from EEC Publishing Frequency Turnaround Time Website Press releases/news alerts (Hometown Heroes is a longer feature – also on social media and recognized at City Council meetings) Topic/ nomination, willingness to be interviewed Ad hoc 1 week (Hometown Heroes = 1-2 months) Better Together Edina Any topic that the Commission wants to get feedback on or engage with the public Topic, drafted text, type of engagement, etc. Ad hoc 1 week Sun Current Newspaper- Guest Column (cannot be submitted on behalf of the Commission/City). Anything coming from the City needs to be submitted by the Comms Dept. Text Weekly Independent submission Edition Edina Newsletter Topic, willingness to be interviewed Monthly 60 days Social Media Facebook, Twitter, Instagram Topic, # of posts Ad hoc Campaign = 1 month Basic post = 1 day Video Agenda: Edina /Mayor’s Minute/ Youtube idea Topic, willingness to be interviewed 2x/month 1 month Direct Mailers postcards, inserts, posters, flyers, etc. Budget, topic Ad hoc 1 month Send Text Text Topic Opt-in 1 month Other Newsletters PW Pipeline and Parks Activities Directory, The Times (Senior Center newsletter) Topic, willingness to be interviewed 2x/year (The Times = 10x/yr) 3 months City Extra Emails Can choose topic area-bulk emails Topic, draft text Opt-in 1 week Contact Information Grace Hancock Sustainability Manager GHancock@EdinaMN.gov Communication Department Project Lead Times The following lead times are organized by level of work involved by Communication Department. These are recommended by the staff to provide guidance for marketing and communication development. Level 1 (1 day) • Re-order of existing project Level 2 (3 days) • Re-sizing existing project (no other edits) • Website banner images • Basic photo editing Level 3 (1 week- small changes) • Copy changes where text doesn’t move • Postcards • Rack cards • Social media graphics based on existing campaign • PowerPoint presentation graphics for public event Level 4 (2 weeks-updates) • New social media graphics • Updates to existing pieces (new copy, colors, photos or combination thereof) • Posters and flyers • Ads Level 5 (3-4 weeks-significant projects) • New campaigns • New art • Brochures • Reports • Pamphlets and booklets Level 6 (More than 1 month (to be negotiated or determined with Director-large projects)) • Re-brand • Logo design • Publication redesign