Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-02-13 Planning Commission Packet
Agenda Plan n ing Com m ission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers Wednesday, February 13, 2019 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes A.Minutes: Planning Commission, December 12, 2018 V.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Better Together-MJ Lamon VI.Public Hearings A.PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Ordinance Amendment; Revise PUD- 17 for Pentagon Park South, 4815 & 4901 77th Street and 7710 Computer Avenue B.4501 Garrison Ln 1st 8oor height varinace C.4536 France Avenue Sign Variance VII.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for consideration at a future meeting. VIII.Reports/Recommendations A.Sketch Plan Review - 7079 Amundson Avenue B.Comprehensive Plan Update IX.Correspondence And Petitions X.Chair And Member Comments XI.Sta@ Comments XII.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampliBc ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: F rom:Liz O ls on, Administrative S upport S pecialist Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion, Dec ember 12, 2018 C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: P lease approve the December 12, 2018, P lanning C ommission Meeting Minutes I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : Planning Commis s ion, December 12, 2018 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 1 of 6 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers December 12, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Thorsen, Strauss, Mangalick, Melton, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Olsen Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Kaylin Eidsness, Senior Communications Coordinator, Liz Olson, Support Staff Absent from the roll call: Lee III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the December 12, 2018, agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Commissioner Thorsen moved to approve the November 28, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. V. Public Hearings A. Greater Southdale District Plan Michael Schroeder, Working Group Co-Chair, introduced himself and presented a PowerPoint that outlined the plan and the design experience guidelines. Public Hearing Bob Erickson, Senior Development Associate for Wildamere, acknowledged the good work of the committee and Michael Schroeder. Erickson discussed pages 77 and 78 not belonging in the plan. John Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive, stated that he was pleased the Southdale working group was accessible to the neighborhood. Carlson expressed wanting to see what Edina’s population growth forecast is in regards to the housing market. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 2 of 6 Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, discussed the community challenges we face, including high and increasing inequality, a history of racial discrimination in housing and employment, local and regional economic competition in a global economy, and climate change. Melton commended the housing section in the plan and urged the Planning Commission to support the Greater Southdale District plan as written. Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road, stated that she was pleased the plan included a section regarding water resources. Mark Manfred, 4445 Dunham Drive, expressed concerns about the density and Edina becoming “apartment centric.” Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Comments/Questions Director Teague commented on pages 77 and 78 stating they aren’t necessary in a Comprehensive Plan and the two pages could be removed and it wouldn’t impact the document in any way. Director Teague also discussed studying the need of housing and growth and that it could be separate from the Comprehensive Plan, but could be a City Council initiative to do a study on what the needs are. Student Commissioners expressed appreciation for the environmental impact and consideration affecting the community. Commissioners discussed that the plan could to be a model for how the City of Edina should develop in the future and how other cities and suburbs can develop and re-develop their entities. Commissioners continued to discuss goals in the Implementation Section, such as adding a parking/multimodal fund, Metro Transit’s E Line aBRT, a bicycle network, and using major streets like France and York as boulevards with transpiration on them. Commissioners complimented the work group and stated it was great to hear from Edina Residents during the process. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of the Greater Southdale District Plan as with the condition that the Existing Zoning and Existing Height Overlay District on pages 77 and 78 be removed from the document. Chair Olsen added a friendly amendment to have stronger implementation as proposed by Commissioner Miranda. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 3 of 6 B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment- 7399, 7410, & 7505 Metro Boulevard Director Teague presented a PowerPoint explaining that the specific request of the Planning Commission is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to re-guide 7399, 7401, and 7505 Metro Boulevard from O, Office District to OR, Office Residential District, with an overall density of 50 units per acre. Director Teague also explained that Staff does not supportive of the amendment due to the existing sanitary sewer system serving this site being at capacity. Teague stated Staff is recommending denial subject to the findings that are outlined in the staff report. Perry Ryan, with Lake West Development, introduced himself and showed a slightly updated site plan that included the project’s phases. Public Hearing Jacob Steen, Larkin Hoffman Attorneys 8300 Norman center Drive, Representing Film Tech. Steen stated that he believes the application to be premature. Steen stated that the sewer capacity issue and added traffic is alarming to his client and he supports denial of the project. Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road, stated that she represents that Lake Cornelia Neighborhood Association and expressed concerns about the sewage backing up and the knowledge of existing affordable housing units in Edina. John Stechman, 7460 Shannon Drive, stated concern about increasing non-ownership density and the schools being impacted negatively. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners asked if sanitary was the main concern or if there were other public utilities of concern and Chad Millner replied that sanitary is the main concern. Commissioners asked Millner if the applicant was able to find another way to address the sewer concerns. Millner replied that the applicant can talk to other water users in the Industrial Park and added that those discussions would take quite a while. Director Teague stated that Film Tech, the neighboring property, was opposed to it. Commissioners asked Director Teague if we might have land that cannot be developed if it is only office. Teague replied that the concern would be that with this amendment, we’re not precluding an office from going on that site, but given the housing market there might not be a new office developed on that site. Commissioners asked Millner how many trunk lines the City of Edina has. Millner replied that there are 3 meter stations out in the Met Council system and the trunk line follows 9 Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek to the appropriate meter stations. Commissioners discussed affordable housing and that it be located near public transit facilities and Ryan responded that there is a Metro Transit line near the proposed area and near the Burger King and coffee shop area. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 4 of 6 Commissioners asked if Lake West Development did similar projects that were outside the realm of what is in the land use plan and contributed to increasing sewage capacity or another infrastructure. Ryan replied that they had completed a few that required a guide plan change and land use change, but nothing with sewage capacity. Commissioners thanked the applicant for presenting a sketch plan instead of a finished document so it could be discussed in the planning stage. Commissioners expressed concern regarding the land being isolated and not being a part of a neighborhood. Commissioners stated that this project meets quite a few of the City’s needs but the affordable housing being all in one location isn’t preferable. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 7399, 7410, & 7505 Metro Boulevard as recommended in the staff memo subject to the findings therein. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. C. 4412 Valley View Road Variances for New Horizon Academy Director Teague stated the applicant would significantly remodel the existing retail and office building into a day care facility and the existing building is 9,047 square feet in size and has been used for a variety of retail and offices uses over the years. Teague discussed the proposed remodeled building would be 9,600 square feet in size and the remodeling includes changing the hip roof into a flat roof, and locating a play area on to the roof. Teague stated that an elevator would be required to get staff and the kids to the roof and a height variance would be required for this elevator that would also include a lobby, stairs and storage area. Teague stated Staff is recommending approval of the variances subject to the findings that are outlined in the staff report. Scott Isrealson, with Traffic Impact Group, introduced himself explained the study was done during rush hour in September and took Edina Flats into account. Isrealson specifically discussed Kellogg Avenue and the amount of trips to and from is estimated to be roughly 2 percent of the total. Vickie Hesche with Rylar Architects and Chad Dunkley with New Horizon Academy introduced themselves and explained more details on the project. Public Hearing John Victorsen, 7213 Cornelia Drive, explained that he manages the home to the south of the proposed property at 4415 Valley View Road. Victorsen explained that the parking has never been an issue but the noise has been a concern. Victorsen stated that New Horizon has been a good neighbor and he has no complaints. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Motion Commissioner Thorsen moved approval of variances outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 5 of 6 VII. Community Comment None. VIII. Reports/Recommendations A. 70th & Cahill Small Area Plan Commissioners explained that they received all of the submittals and comments turned in to the Planning Commission. Chair Olsen explained that the Planning Commission directed Staff to draft the proposed amendments and Director Teague was only following their request. Director Teague explained that the staff memo addresses the potential to allow greater density to provide affordable housing; and to provide language that could be negotiated through a variance or rezoning to increase height rather than amending the Zoning Ordinance to give property owners by right to go to the height limits within the Plan. Commissioners continued with a lengthy discussion regarding height, density, and affordable housing. Commissioner Berube moved for approval of the 70th & Cahill Small Area Plan as written. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. Aye: Strauss, Nemerov, Berube, Olsen Nay: Miranda, Thorsen, Hamilton, Bennett The motion fails 4-4. Commissioner Hamilton made a motion to recommend approval of the edits to the Small Area Plan to City Council as written in the staff memo dated December 12, 2018. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. Aye: Miranda, Thorsen, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube Nay: Strauss, Nemerov, Olsen The motion passed 5-3. IX. Correspondence And Petitions None. X. Chair and Member Comments Commissioners discussed the Southwest light rail ceremonial ground breaking was on November 30th, 2018 and something that should be considered when discussing future developments. XI. Staff Comments None. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 6 of 6 XII. Adjournment Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the December 12, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 10:05 PM. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : Zoning O rdinanc e Amendment; R evis e P UD-17 for P entagon P ark S outh, 4815 & 4901 77th S treet and 7710 C omputer Avenue Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R ecommend the C ity C ouncil approve the Amendment subject to the findings and conditions in the attached staff report. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Draft Ordinance Proposed Plans Parking/Traffic Study Applicant Narrative Previous ly Approved Plans Site Location January 30, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Revise PUD-17 for Pentagon Park South. (4815 & 4901 77th Street and 7710 Computer Avenue.) Information / Background: Solomon Real Estate Group is requesting a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise their approved development plans for Pentagon Park South (4815 & 4901 77th Street and 7710 Computer Avenue.) The original approved plans include: Two retail/restaurant buildings totaling 11,800 square feet; A four-story193-room hotel; A four-story 153-room hotel with a parking ramp below it; A 20,000 s.f. office building with a parking ramp below it; A retail/office building 19,000 square feet; and A 150,000-210,000 s.f. office building The following are the revisions proposed: Increase the size of one of the hotels from a four-story 193-room hotel to a five-story 235- room hotel; construct one parking ramp instead of two parking ramps; and Allow construction of the 2-story office retail building in Phase I. The overall proposed plans would include the following: Two retail/restaurant buildings totaling 12,020 square feet; A five-story 235-room hotel; A four-story 153-room hotel with no parking below it; A retail/office building 18,005 square feet; A 150,000-215,000 s.f. office building; and A parking ramp (423 stalls in phase 1). STAFF REPORT Page 2 Phase one would build all of the above except the 150,000-215,000 square foot office building and the expanded parking ramp. The uses proposed are the same as the original proposal. The proposed parking meets City Code for Phase 1. Phase 2 buildout of the office building would require an amendment to the PUD to review the proposed site plan and parking requirements. Because this project was rezoned to PUD, the revision of the overall development plan requires a Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the original PUD. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Multi-family residential and retail; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District and guided OR, Office Residential. Easterly: Office/light industrial uses; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided OR, Office Residential. Southerly: City of Bloomington. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The proposed redevelopment site is currently vacant. All the buildings on the site were removed a few years ago. The site is 12.5 acres in size, and relatively flat. The site is being prepared for construction by grading the site. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: PUD-17, Planned Unit Development-17 District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, the first phase of development would meet City Code standards for parking. The hotel would require 438 stalls based on 388 rooms and 50 employees on a maximum shift; the retail and office space would require 164 stalls; for a total of 602 stalls required by Code. The proposed plans include 185 surface parking stalls and 423 stalls in the ramp for a total of 608. WSB updated the parking study and concluded the parking would be adequate for Phase 1. (See attached study.) The number of parking stalls demonstrated for Phase 2 would not support the uses based on the parking study done by WSB, therefore, additional parking stalls would likely be required for Phase 2, and could be accommodated by expanding the size of the parking STAFF REPORT Page 3 ramp. The specific requirement for parking for Phase 2 would be considered during the Final Development Plan review process. Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Access to the proposed development would be off all four sides of the site; 77th Street, Normandale Road, Computer Avenue and Viking Drive. There is internal access to all uses within the site. The main entrance to the site is off 77th Street. There are no changes from the already approved plans. WSB also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project subject to the following road improvements: 1. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. 2. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. No changes would be required from the original study. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 50 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 140 overstory trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. At full build out of the project, the landscaping would be a vast improvement over existing landscaping and trees. With the removal of the second parking ramp an additional 19,400 square feet of green space would be added to the site. Within this area landscaping is increased, sidewalks are added as well as a small park like feature on the entrance to the hotels on Computer Avenue. Grading/Drainage/Utilities Within the project there is a water feature in the center plaza area. There would also be underground storage. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading and trash areas would be adjacent to the buildings and within the parking ramps. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 12 stories and 144 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The proposed project meets the City’s height standards. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of masonry, metal panel, wood panel and glass. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Materials are consistent with the originally proposed materials. (See attached.) Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. STAFF REPORT Page 5 (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal would enhance pedestrian, bike and vehicular connections in the area. A boulevard sidewalk is proposed along all four streets, as well as a series of internal pedestrian connections. There are also pedestrian crosswalks proposed across 77th street. (See attached plans.) Bike racks shall be provided to meet City Code as highlighted in (6) above, which would be 30 stalls for bikes. COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the existing MDD-6 District: PUD-17 Proposed Setbacks – Structures 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories 9 stories (potential Phase 2) Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 27% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District 602 required (based on 388 room hotel + 29,473 s.f. retail/office) 608 stalls proposed STAFF REPORT Page 6 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Are the proposed changes reasonable to justify the PUD Amendment? Yes. The proposed changes are reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Improved Site Plan. The proposal eliminates one of the parking structures, which vastly improves the site along Viking Drive. There would be more green space and walking paths. 2. Added green space. With the removal of the second parking ramp an additional 19,400 square feet of green space is added to the site. Within this area landscaping is increased, sidewalks are added as well as a small park like feature on the entrance to the hotels on Computer Avenue. (See attached plans.) 3. Code compliant parking. The proposal for the first phase of development would meet the City’s parking regulations. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a follow up examination on parking and traffic and found development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to the previously required roadway improvements. Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance Amendment to revise PUD-17, including Site Plan approval for Phase 1 and Overall Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal is consistent with previously approval plans for the site and PUD-17. 2. The proposed land uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposal adds 19,000 square feet of green space. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Phase 1 shall be developed per the Final Plans submitted and date stamped December 14, 2018 and January 17, 2019, including the materials and materials board presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be STAFF REPORT Page 7 submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 4. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 5. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated January 24, 2019. 7. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including: A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. 8. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city standard at the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings. 9. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. 10. Compliance with the recommendation in the city’s sustainability coordinator’s memo dated June 27, 2018. 11. Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. 12. The Phase 2 office site shall be landscaped per the proposed Phase 1 site plan and the sidewalks constructed. 13. The number of parking stalls demonstrated for Phase 2 would not support the uses based on the parking study done by WSB, therefore, additional parking stalls would likely be required for Phase 2. The specific requirement for parking for Phase 2 will be considered during the Final Development Plan review process. Deadline for a city decision: March 19, 2019 DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE NO. 2019-__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO REVISE THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on July 5, 2018 January 17, 2019 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-62 2019- ___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% Maximum Floor Area 1.5% 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. (h) Ninety percent (90%) of the parking stalls within the development shall be available to all uses within the development. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Ratio (FAR) Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District Phase 1 (Based on the uses) 1,422 stalls at full buildout 602 stalls 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 1SITE PLAN N REST /RET 1 REST / RET 2 RET /OFFICE OFFICE1 OFFICE2 PARKING DECK BELOW DUAL BRANDHOTEL (1) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) EXTENDED STAY HOTEL (2) PARKING DECK BELOW 01/16/195/9/18 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 2AERIAL VIEWS 01/16/195/9/18 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 3 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 1 SITE PLAN 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 4PHASE 1 AERIAL 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 5 N WEST 77TH STREET NORMANDALE ROADCOMPUTER AVEVIKING DRIVE PHASE 2 SITE PLAN 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 6PHASE 2 AERIAL 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 7PHASE 3 SITE PLAN N 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 8PHASE 3 AERIAL 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 9 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 B C D RAMP UP UNEXCAVATED14'-0"33'-0"36'-0"36'-0"36'-0"36'-0"36'-0"33'-0"14'-0"60'-10"60'-10"60'-10"STORAGE4.7 5.3 A.3 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xx x x x x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xx xx xx xxxxxx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 24'-0"12'-0"12'-0"24'-0" PARKING GARAGE GROUND PLAN P P P 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 10PARKING GARAGE - NORTH PHASE 1 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 11PARKING GARAGE - SOUTH PHASE 1 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 12PARKING GARAGE ELEVATIONS NORTH ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EL: 11’-6” AFF EL: 11’-6” AFF EL: 21’-10” AFF EL: 21’-10” AFF EL: 35’-2” AFF GLASS CURTAIN WALL GLASS CURTAIN WALL BLACK PAINTED ACCENT METALVEGETATIVE SCREEN GRAPHIC PANELS VEGETATIVE SCREEN NATURAL FINISH PRECAST PANELS COLORED PRECAST PANELS BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 13PARKING GARAGE ELEVATIONS EAST ELEVATION MATERIALS WEST ELEVATION EL: 11’-6” AFF EL: 11’-6” AFF EL: 21’-10” AFF EL: 21’-10” AFF EL: 32’-2” AFF EL: 29’-6” AFF PAINT COLORED PRECAST PANELS VEGETATIVE SCREEN BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BLACK PAINTEDACCENT METAL GLASS CURTAIN WALL PERFORATED METAL NATURAL FINISH PRECAST PANELS GLASS CURTAIN WALL BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM BLACK ANODIZED ALUMINUM PERFORATED METAL PERFORATED METALRAMP BEYONDELEVATOR CORE BEYOND RAMP BEYOND NATURAL FINISH PRECAST PANELS NATURAL FINISH PRECAST PANELS 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 14HAWKEYE HOTEL ELEVATIONS +13'-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR +0'-0" FIRST FLOOR ELEV. +24' 0-3/8" THIRD FLOOR +34' 4-1/4" FOURTH FLOOR +44' 3-1/8" FOURTH SLAB 13'-812"10'-378"+57'-10-3/4" PARAPET 1 10'-378"10'-378"+55' 0-3/4" ROOF DECK 10'-458"+59'-1-3/4" PARAPET 2 +61'-0-3/4" PARAPET 3 +63'-6-3/4" PARAPET 4 69'-558"1'-3"2'-10"2'1'-11"+13'-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR +0'-0" FIRST FLOOR ELEV. +24' 0-3/8" THIRD FLOOR +34' 4-1/4" FOURTH FLOOR +44' 3-1/8" FOURTH SLAB 13'-812"10'-378"+57'-10-3/4" PARAPET 1 10'-378"10'-378"+55' 0-3/4" ROOF DECK 10'-458"+59'-1-3/4" PARAPET 2 +61'-0-3/4" PARAPET 3 +63'-6-3/4" PARAPET 4 69'-558"1'-3"2'-10"2'1'-11"Seal DRAWING NO. SHEET NAME DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE PROJECT NO. 2018.11.30 AS NOTED Owner:FFIS & TPSEDINA,MNHAWKEYE HOTELS 1601 N. Roosevelt Ave. Burlington, IA 52601www.hawkeyehotels.com SRB No.ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS www.base-4.com BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 DH A3.1 ELEVATIONS 1 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" LEGEND-EXTERIOR FINISHES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 MATERIAL NAMECODEMTL-TYPE COLOR EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION BENJAMIN MOORE NICHIHA FIBRE CEMENTSIDING DEEP SPACE 2125-20 EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION BENJAMIN MOORE MARS RED 2172-20 SHERWIN WILLIAMSDORIAN GRAY SW 7017 BENJAMIN MOORE SPACE BLACK 2119-10 ASH BENJAMIN MOORE DISTANT GRAY OC-68 EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION NORMAN BRICK BLACK OPAL 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 15 +13'-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR +0'-0" FIRST FLOOR ELEV. +24' 0-3/8" THIRD FLOOR +34' 4-1/4" FOURTH FLOOR +44' 3-1/8" FOURTH SLAB 13'-812"10'-378"+57'-10-3/4" PARAPET 1 10'-378"10'-378"+55' 0-3/4" ROOF DECK 10'-458"+59'-1-3/4" PARAPET 2 +61'-0-3/4" PARAPET 3 +63'-6-3/4" PARAPET 4 69'-558"1'-3"2'-10"2'1'-11"+13'-8 1/2" SECOND FLOOR +0'-0" FIRST FLOOR ELEV. +24' 0-3/8" THIRD FLOOR +34' 4-1/4" FOURTH FLOOR +44' 3-1/8" FOURTH SLAB 13'-812"10'-378"+57'-10-3/4" PARAPET 1 10'-378"10'-378"+55' 0-3/4" ROOF DECK 10'-458"+59'-1-3/4" PARAPET 2 +61'-0-3/4" PARAPET 3 +63'-6-3/4" PARAPET 4 69'-558"1'-3"2'-10"2'1'-11"Seal DRAWING NO. SHEET NAME DATE DRAWN BY CHECKED BY SCALE PROJECT NO. 2018.11.30 AS NOTED Owner:FFIS & TPSEDINA,MNHAWKEYE HOTELS 1601 N. Roosevelt Ave. Burlington, IA 52601www.hawkeyehotels.com SRB No.ISSUE DATE PROJECT STATUS www.base-4.com BASE4 2901 CLINT MOORE ROAD #114BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 DH A3.2 ELEVATIONS 1 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" 2 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32"=1'-0" LEGEND-EXTERIOR FINISHES 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 MATERIAL NAMECODEMTL-TYPE COLOR EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION BENJAMIN MOORE NICHIHA FIBRE CEMENTSIDING DEEP SPACE 2125-20 EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION BENJAMIN MOORE MARS RED 2172-20 SHERWIN WILLIAMSDORIAN GRAY SW 7017 BENJAMIN MOORE SPACE BLACK 2119-10 ASH BENJAMIN MOORE DISTANT GRAY OC-68 EIFS-DRYVIT OUTSULATION NORMAN BRICK BLACK OPAL HAWKEYE HOTEL ELEVATIONS 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 16WATERWALK HOTEL ELEVATIONS BUILDING 1 A A B C D A ADDD DDDDBBBBC 1ST FLOOR EL.0'-0" NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION CORRUGATED METAL PANEL FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL MASONRY 2ND FLOOR EL.10'-6" 3RD FLOOR EL.20'-0" 4TH FLOOR EL.29'-6" PARAPET EL.44'-0" D A BBDDABB A A ADAD ADDBBBBBC Building #1 - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina WaterWalk December 14, 2018 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 17WATERWALK HOTEL ELEVATIONS BUILDING 2 A B C D CORRUGATED METAL PANEL FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL FIBER CEMENT PANEL MASONRY SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION 1ST FLOOR EL.0'-0" 2ND FLOOR EL.10'-6" 3RD FLOOR EL.20'-0" 4TH FLOOR EL.29'-6" PARAPET EL.44'-0" A A ADDD DDDDBBBBC A A ADDD DDDDBBBBC A D BBBDABBD Building #2 - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina WaterWalk December 14, 2018 Rendering #1 Pentagon Park South, Edina WaterWalk December 14, 2018 Rendering #2 Pentagon Park South, Edina WaterWalk December 14, 2018 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 20 B C D F 1ST FLOOR EL.0'-0"SOUTH ELEVATION FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL METAL PANEL MASONRY NORTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION PARAPET EL.22'-6" B D F B DBAFB FADBEDBDFCABC E METAL PANEL A CORRUGATED METAL PANEL MECH SCREEN A METAL PANEL F E Retail #1 - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina Restaurant/Retail #1 November 30, 2018 RETAIL/RESTAURANT 1 ELEVATIONS 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 21 SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION B D FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL MASONRY 1ST FLOOR EL.0'-0" PARAPET EL.22'-6" DCBCEFDFEDBFAD D E F B D ECDAEBDC C METAL PANEL A CORRUGATED METAL PANEL MECH SCREEN E METAL PANEL METAL PANEL F Retail #2 - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina Restaurant/Retail #2 November 30, 2018 RETAIL/RESTAURANT 2 ELEVATIONS 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 22 SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION A F FDBEC A D C E A D B A B D FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL MASONRY C METAL PANEL A CORRUGATED METAL PANEL MECH SCREEN E METAL PANEL METAL PANEL F Retail/Office - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina Retail/Office November 30, 2018 RETAIL/OFFICE ELEVATIONS 16 JAN 2019 PENTAGON VILLAGE MASTER PLAN CONCEPT EDINA, MN 23 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 1ST FLOOR EL.0'-0" 2ND FLOOR EL.18'-0" PARAPET EL.40'-0" DEACBCAD AF C C BDBAE B D FAUX WOOD METAL PANEL MASONRY C METAL PANEL A CORRUGATED METAL PANEL MECH SCREEN E METAL PANEL METAL PANEL F Retail/Office - Elevations Pentagon Park South, Edina Retail/Office November 30, 2018 RETAIL/OFFICE ELEVATIONS Memorandum To: Mr. Cary Teague, Community Development Director City of Edina From: Charles Rickart, P.E., PTOE, Project Manager WSB Date: January 22, 2019 Re: Pentagon Village Development (Solomon Real Estate) Updated Traffic and Parking Study City of Edina, MN WSB Project No. 11953-00 Background A Traffic and Parking Study was completed in May 2018 documenting the anticipated traffic and parking impacts the proposed redevelopment of the Pentagon Park south area (Solomon Real Estate Group) site would have on the adjacent roadway system. The site is located on the south side of W. 77th Street between TH 100 and Computer Avenue. The site, now referred to as Pentagon Village, is proposed to be revised as follows: • Increased Hotel rooms from 346 to 388 • Increased Retail/Restaurant uses from 11,800sf to 12,020sf • Decreased Retail/Office use from 19,000sf to 18,005sf • Increased Office use from 225,000sf to 255.000sf • Provided parking changed: o Phase 1 – reduced from 663 spaces to 636 spaces o Phase 2 – increased from 759 spaces to 1068 spaces o Future Phase 3 – reduced from 1422 spaces to 1068 spaces The development of the revised Pentagon Village development is planned to be completed in three phases: Phase 1: • 388 hotel rooms in two buildings • 12,020 square feet of retail / restaurant uses in two buildings • 18,005 square feet of retail uses • 213 surface parking spaces • 423 parking ramp spaces Phase 2: • 155,000 square feet of office in one building • 438 additional parking ramp spaces Future Phase 3: • 100,000 square feet of office in one building Access to the site will remain as shown in the previously approved concept, from public streets and driveways off W. 77th Street, Computer Avenue, Viking Drive and Normandale Road. The full development of the revised Pentagon Village development is shown on the attached Figure 1. This memorandum provides an updated review of the traffic and parking impacts, based on the revised site plan and phased development proposal. Pentagon Village Updated Traffic and Parking Review City of Edina January 22, 2019 Page 2 Traffic Impact Analysis The estimated trip generation from the proposed revised total Pentagon Village development is shown below in Table 1. The trip generation used to estimate the proposed site traffic is based on rates for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The table shows the Daily, PM peak hour and AM peak hour trip generation for the proposed revised development. Table 1 - Estimated Trip Generation – Pentagon Village (Solomon Real Estate Group) Land Use ITE Code Size Time of Day Trip Rate Trip Generation Total In Out % Trips % Trips Office 710 235,000 gsf Daily 9.74 2,484 50 1,242 50 1,242 AM Peak 1.16 296 86 255 14 41 PM Peak 1.15 293 16 47 84 246 Retail 820 18,005 gsf Daily 37.75 680 50 340 50 340 AM Peak 0.94 17 57 10 43 7 PM Peak 3.81 69 52 36 48 33 Retail / Restaurant 932 12,020 gsf Daily 112.18 1,348 50 674 50 674 AM Peak 9.94 119 55 65 45 54 PM Peak 9.77 117 62 73 38 44 Hotel 310 388 rms Daily 8.36 3,244 50 1,622 50 1,622 AM Peak 0.47 182 59 107 41 75 PM Peak 0.6 233 51 119 49 114 Total Daily 7,756 3,878 3,878 AM Peak 614 437 177 PM Peak 712 275 437 Internal Trips Daily -809 -404 -405 AM Peak -90 -48 -42 PM Peak -89 -58 -31 Updated Development Plan Net Increase in Trips Daily 6,947 3,474 3,473 AM Peak 524 389 135 PM Peak 623 217 406 May 2018 Development Plan Net Increase in Trips Daily 6,330 3,165 3,165 AM Peak 470 346 124 PM Peak 567 199 368 Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition Based on the revised total site trip generation the trips would increase by: 617 trips in day (9.7%); 54 trips in the AM peak hour (11.5%), and; 56 in the PM peak hour (9.9%), over those found in the May 2018 Traffic and Parking Study. Table 2 shows a comparison between the revised full build proposal of the area (Pentagon Park proposals both north and south of W. 77th Street with the estimated remainder of the Gateway Area) and the AUAR Scenarios. Based on the full build of the area the current Pentagon Park proposed development would generate fewer trips than those included in the AUAR except the daily traffic for the AUAR Scenario 1 condition. Pentagon Village Updated Traffic and Parking Review City of Edina January 22, 2019 Page 3 Table 2 – Traffic Generation Comparison Scenario ADT AM Peak PM Peak Revised Pentagon Park Proposals w/ Remainder of Gateway Area 20,625 1,588 1,861 AUAR Scenario 1 17,771 2,068 2,078 AUAR Scenario 2 27,825 2,778 2,931 AUAR Scenario 3 34,475 4,057 4,050 AUAR Scenario 4 22,789 2,123 2,270 Based on the above comparison the increased traffic as a result of the revised Pentagon Village development proposal would not change the recommended roadway or intersection improvements as a result from the approved development plan outlined in the May 2018 Traffic and Parking Study. Parking Demand Analysis The parking demand for the revised Pentagon Village development was analyzed based on the anticipated use for the site. Based on the current City Code the proposed site at full development would require a total of 1,904 parking spaces. The current site plan (Figure 1) includes a total of 1,068 spaces at full development. Table 3 shows a breakdown of the parking required per City Code for each anticipated development phase. Based on the results of the parking demand analysis the spaces provided with Phase 1 of the development would meet City Code. However, with the addition Phase 2 of the development or assuming the full development (Phase 3), the site would not meet City Code. A 336-space parking variance would be required for the site development with Phase 2 or an 836-space parking variance with full site development (Phase 3). Table 3 – Parking Required per City Code Source: City of Edina Use Size Rate Parking Required Parking Provided Hotel 388 Rooms / 50 Employees 1/room + 1/employee 438 213 Surface 423 Ramp Retail / Restaurant Rest =7,419 sf /124 seats /10employees Retail = 4,601 sf Rest = 1/3 seats + 1/employee Retail = 8/first 1000sf + 6/additional 1000sf 81 Retail 18,005 sf Retail = 8/first 1000sf + 6/additional 1000sf 110 Total Parking Phase 1 629 636 Office 155,000 sf 1/200sf 775 438 Ramp Total Parking Phase 1 and Phase 2 1404 1068 Office 100,000 sf 1/200sf 500 Total Pentagon Village Parking (Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3) 1,904 1068 Pentagon Village Updated Traffic and Parking Review City of Edina January 22, 2019 Page 4 The parking demand was also analyzed based on industry standards. The parking generation rates used to estimate the parking demand was based on surveys of the parking generation for other similar land uses as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition. Table 4 below shows the estimated parking generation rate and the anticipated peak parking demand on a typical weekday. This would represent the worst -case conditions for the parking of the site. Table 4 – Site Parking Demand per ITE Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition Comparing the provided parking stalls to the industry standard (ITE Rates), Phase 1 has an adequate number of stalls. However, in comparing the provided parking stalls to the industry standard (ITE Rates), Phase 2 would be under parked by 103 spaces and full site development (Phase 3) would be under parked by 448 spaces. The developer is currently only requesting the approval for Phase 1 of the Pentagon Village project, which meets City Code and the industry standard (ITE Rates) for parking on the site based on the proposed uses. As outlined above the anticipated development of Phase 2 and Phase 3 does not meet City Code or the industry standard (ITE Rates) for parking with the current anticipated uses. It should be noted that at the time these phases are proposed the planned uses and parking will require an updated parking demand analysis. That analysis would include reviewing the needed parking vs the available parking including determining the impact of shared parking between the retail, hotel and office uses. Conclusion Based on the updated traffic and parking analysis documented in this memorandum, WSB has concluded the following: • The proposed updated Pentagon Village development site redevelopment has been revised to include: increased Hotel rooms to 388; increased Retail/Restaurant uses to 12,020sf; decreased Retail/Office use to 18,005sf, and; increased Office use to 255.000sf. Use Size Rate Parking Required Hotel 388 Rooms 1.2/room 466 Retail / Restaurant Rest = 7,419 sf Retail = 4,601 sf Rest = 13.3 / 1000 sf Retail = 3.16 / 1000 sf 113 Retail 18,005 sf Retail = 3.16 / 1000 sf 57 Total Parking Phase 1 636 Office 155,000 sf 3.45 / 1000 sf 535 Total Parking Phase 1 and Phase 2 1,171 Office 100,000 sf 3.45 / 1000 sf 345 Total Pentagon Village Parking (Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3) 1,516 Pentagon Village Updated Traffic and Parking Review City of Edina January 22, 2019 Page 5 • The provided parking spaces per phase has changed to include: Phase 1, reduced to 636 spaces; Phase 2, increased to 1068 spaces, and; Full development (Phase 3), reduced to 1068 spaces. • The revised total Pentagon Village trip generation the total site trips would increase by: 617 trips in day; 54 trips in the AM peak hour, and; 56 in the PM peak hour, over those found in the May 2018 Traffic and Parking Study. • Based on the traffic review the increased traffic as a result of the revised Pentagon Village development proposal would not change the recommended roadway or intersection improvements from the May 2018 Traffic and Parking Study. • Based on the parking demand review for the revised Pentagon Village development proposal, the spaces provided with Phase 1 of the development will meet City Code. However, with the addition Phase 2 or assuming the full development (Phase 3), the site would not meet City Code. A 336-space parking variance would be required for the site development with Phase 2 or an 836-space parking variance with full site development (Phase 3). • Based on the industry standard ITE parking generation estimates, Phase 1 has an adequate number of spaces. However, Phase 2 would be under parked by 103 spaces and full site development (Phase 3) would be under parked by 44 8 spaces. This would represent the worst-case condition for the needed parking on the site. • The developer is currently only requesting the approval of Phase 1 of the Pentagon Village project, which meets City Code and the industry standard (ITE Rates) for parking on the site based on the proposed uses. • At the time the future phases are proposed the planned uses and parking will require an updated parking demand analysis. That analysis would include reviewing the needed parking vs the available parking including determining the impact of shared parking between the retail, hotel and office uses. Pentagon Village Updated Traffic and Parking Review City of Edina January 22, 2019 Page 6 Figure 1 – Pentagon Village Plan (Full Development) Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Kris Aaker Assistant P lanner Item Activity: Subject:4501 G arris on Ln 1st floor height varinac e Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he applicant is requesting to increase the first floor elevation 3.33 feet higher than the current home’s first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 4501 Garrison Lane. T he C ity of Edina’s E ngineering standards require the basement elevation of the new home to be 2 feet higher than the F E M A base flood elevation. T he requirement for increased height in basement elevations impacts the ability for the project to conform to the maximum first floor height requirement of 1 foot.T he existing home is a home built in 1961 prior to the F E M A floodplain study conducted in 1979 to determine flood risk areas. I t is a C ity and Watershed District goal to elevate and remove homes out of the flood hazard areas when the opportunity presents itself. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 4501 Garrison Ln 1st floor height varinace Aerial Map 1 Aerial Map 2 STAFF REPORT Date: To: From: January 30, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Subject: B- 18-32, A 2 .33 foot first floor height variance (over three feet total) for a new home at 4501 Garrison Lane Information / Background: The applicant is requesting to increase the first floor elevation 3.33 feet higher than the current home's first floor elevation in order to construct a new home at 4501 Garrison Lane. 4501 Garrison Lane is approximately 13, 444 square feet in area and is located on the south side of Garrison Lane, on the west side of Wooddale Ave., north of Garrison Lake and is located in the floodplain. The City of Edina's Engineering standards require the basement elevation of the new home to be 2 feet higher than the FEMA base flood elevation. The requirement for increased height in basement elevations impacts the ability for the project to conform to the maximum first floor height requirement of I foot. The existing home is was built in 1961 prior to the FEMA floodplain study conducted in 1979 to determine flood risk areas. It is a City and Watershed District goal to elevate and remove homes out of the flood hazard areas when the opportunity presents itself. A variance is requested to allow the first floor elevation of the new home to exceed the first floor elevation of the existing home by more than one foot. The current home at 4501 Garrison Lane has a basement elevation of 866.8 and a first floor elevation of 875.7 feet above sea level. The established floodplain elevation is at 866.3 with a required protection elevation of 868.3'. The minimum basement elevation must be no less than 2 feet above the flood elevation so the minimum basement elevation required is 868.3'. The proposed basement will be no lower than 868.3'. The proposed first floor elevation of the house is proposed to be at 879.03, which will be 3.33 ft higher than existing. Surrounding Land Use s Northerly: Single Unit residential homes zoned R-1 and guided. low-density residential Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 STAFF REPORT 4 ,;;___ - Southerly: Garrison Lake; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 13,444 square foot lot is located on the south side of Garrison Lane and immediately west Wooddale Ave. and north of Garrison Lake. The property is within the flood zone. The existing rambler home is to be removed. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in their January 22, 2019, memorandum. Grading for the proposed work will closely match existing drainage paths. Drainage will be directed to either Garrison Lane in the front of the property, to Wooddale Ave. or to the rear of the property and into Garrison Lake. The public infrastructure on the street system and Garrison Lane has the capacity to accept the runoff. Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side — East Side - South— West Side — 36.1 feet 20 feet 50 feet 10 feet 36.1 feet 20.2 feet +50 feet 10.2 feet Building Coverage 25% 21.9% First Floor Elevation Building Height 875.7 Existing/ 876.7 Max 35.75 Feet 879.03* 35.74 Feet *Requires a variance STAFF REPORT Page 3 PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Does the proposed new home meet the criteria for approval of variances with a with a first floor elevation 3.33 feet higher than the existing home? Staff believes the proposal meets the criteria for a variance to allow the first floor elevation 3.33 feet higher than the existing home for the following four reasons: I. The proposed use is permitted in the R-1 Single Dwelling Unit District and complies with zoning standards, with exception of the new 1st floor elevation height. The proposed home design elevates the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation two feet above the 100-year FEMA flood elevation of 866.3 removing it from the flood zone. The basement ceiling height is proposed to be 8'-8", which is average for new construction. The over-all height will conform to the maximum allowed height of 35.75 feet. 2. The variance allows the new home to be elevated out of the flood zone and maintain the required distances from the neighbors to the east and west. 3. The proposed home design project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. The home is appropriate in size and scale for the lot and the improvements will enhance the property. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: 1 The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Survey and flood plain elevation, 12/26/2018 • Building plans and elevations date stamped, 12/26/2018. 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo dated 1/22/2019. Request for a Variance at 4501 Garrison Lane Thank you so much for taking the time to consider our variance request! My husband has lived in our home for 16 years and I have been living in our home for almost 10 years. We absolutely LOVE our home, our neighborhood, our community and our lot! We just could not imagine raising our 3 kiddos anywhere else. We love living on the little lake (Lake Nancy). It provides so many things to our family: it is so scenic and beautiful, we love the nature and wildlife it provides. We see so many wonderful birds and ducks! We love taking our children canoeing and ice skating on it as well. We participate in our neighborhood lake association as an effort to keep clean and natural and preserve it. On our own lot, we have always been sure to maintain a natural shore line, with the tall grasses as a buffer to help with this effort. Our family has grown and we need a little more space. We would like to build our new home on our same lot. Our proposed new foundation size is not much larger than the current foundation size. Our impervious footprint will also be less than our current home because of a shorter proposed driveway. It will be a very traditional, classic colonial style home and we are turning the garage doors to face the side street, in order to keep a nice clean front view of the home Our neighborhood is a nice variety of rambler homes, split level homes, and 2 story homes, so we believe our proposed home will fit in well! We do not want to stand out in our neighborhood. Our goal is to blend in. Examples of homes of similar size within a block and on our same street: 1) 4443 Garrison Lane: Our neighbor across Nancy Lane/Wooddale to the East built a new 2 story home about 2 years ago. 2) 4509 Garrison Lane: Two doors down from us on Garrison Lane (to the West of us). This home was built about 4 years ago. It is a one story home, however, it is a beautifully tall 1 story home. It also has a higher main floor/threshold due to the same situation that we are in. 3) 4444 Garrison Lane: Across Garrison Lane from 4443 Garrison Lane (mentioned above) is this home. It is a 2 story home, also set up at a significantly higher elevation than the street (backs up to a body of water as well). 4) 4520 Garrison Lane: At the other end of our block to the West of us, is a traditional 2 story home. ***We have included pictures of the homes referenced above in this packet of information. The Reason for our Variance: -Due to the 100 year flood elevation, our new basement floor will have to be raised up 1.5 feet from the Existing Basement Floor Elevation. -Due to Building Code Section 36 — 439, #7 & #8: Stated below, our New/Proposed First Floor Elevation can only be 1 foot higher than the Existing First Floor Elevation. -This would result in our New Basement Ceiling Height being 6 ft 4 inches tall, which is even less than it is in our Existing House's Basement. Currently, our existing basement ceiling height is 7ft 4 inches. -New Building Code (305.1) Requires a minimum of a 7 foot ceiling height in the basement. These items end up contradicting each other, because by following the first two parts of code we squish our basement ceiling height to 6 ft 4 inches. Which would be less than our current house's basement ceiling height and less than 7 ft, but code says it is supposed to be at least 7 feet tall. We are proposing a basement ceiling height of 8ft 8 inches in the basement. The majority of new construction in Edina has 9 foot ceilings. As I mentioned above, we are trying to make sure our house will fit in nicely with our neighborhood. So due to having our First Floor Elevation higher, we are helping it blend in with a nice retaining wall and landscaping (as you can see in the front elevation picture.) -Existing Basement Floor Elevation —866.8 -Existing Main Floor Elevation- 875.7 =Which gives us an existing ceiling height (after trusses and flooring) or 7 ft 4 inches. -Proposed Basement Floor Elevation — 868.3 -Proposed Main Floor Elevation — 879.03 =Which gives us a proposed ceiling height of 8ft 8 inches (after new truss sizes of 24 inches and flooring). This means we would raise our basement floor 1.5 ft from the existing basement floor elevation and we would raise the Main Floor Elevation by 3.33 ft from the existing elevation. We understand the need for the updated flood elevations that are requiring us to raise our basement floor up 1.5 feet. For example, In 2014 the water table rose up so much that water came up through the floor and we got a good inch of water in the basement. We are requesting a variance for the following piece of code: -The request is to allow our Proposed First Floor Elevation be greater than 1 foot higher than the Existing First Floor Elevation. Instead, it would be 3.33 ft above the Existing First Floor Elevation. Per Section 36 —439, #7 & #8: (7) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of, existing single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the first floor elevation of the dwelling unit being torn down is deemed to be the lowest elevation of an entrance to the dwelling, excluding entrance to the garage and entrances that do not face a street. (8) Additions to, or replacement of, single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building require a variance per [article II], division 3. Such additions to, or replacements of, single dwelling unit buildings must meet one or more of conditions a-c and always meet condition d.: a. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the city's comprehensive water resource management plan; or b. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from groundwater intrusion. Existing and potential groundwater elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under Minn. Stats. ch. 326, or a hydrologist certified by the American Institute of Hydrology. Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow thorough review and approval; or c. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet the state building code, this Code or other statutory requirements; and d. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood in height, mass and scale. Thank you so very much for your consideration! Ellen & James Westin 4501 Garrison Lane Westin New Construction 4501 Garrison Ln Edina, MN 55424 Table of Contents Al Easement Floor Plan A2 Main Floor Plan A3 Second Floor Plan A4 KndouniDoor Schedules A5 Elevations Ab Cross Section Al Portal Framing Detail AB Roof Pitches AI Neighborhood Perspectives A10 L 24- Floor Trusses © 19.2- O.C. Co co 10' 12'1 1i2' J 511a7 Sasernen1 floor Flan S 52' 17' 5,91 - 3 Et1 V) —1- on —)- -J 1 g — 0.;-- I , —C/4*i— —13) 2x8 beam — — ----------J2" foolings belled to 16' © base -Minimum depth of 57 -6x8 treated posts PRO/ECT DE5CRIPTIVI: DRAWINGS PROVIDED 50: Orfield Drafting Serekes Wes. Nem Constr.. W sets 3507 on. d o si, 4501 Canis. In Ca Ma, MN 55124 Minneapolis, KR 55410 (952)451-2705 SUM, .1111.1.1(LL 24' > -4 I — —(3) 2010 beam (3) 2x10 HDR 12' footings belled to 16- @ base -Minimum depth of 5'0* -64 treated posts 22' 2 (2) 1 314'x 14' LVL HDR u '0'0 sIslor otXZ Plea 16' diameter footings belled to ze © base -Minimum depth of 5'0" -6x6 treated posts "vo sIslor ovz Mewl L J} -J ,^4 (2)1 3/4"x 9 1/2' FOR L es, 4.-5" 24' 6" Om PP T-5 1/2" I 1 Gabbles 1 hr fire rated door Notch roof trusses where stairs are for 6'8" headroom Portal frame this wan )1 3/4" x 14" LVL HDR 12' Portal frame this wall (2) 1 3/4" x 14" LVL HDR 12 WE4 r--8'-71/2"7-6" Ll ng Room Garage floor down 5'6" from main floor height type 'a' fim rated drywall on walls Garage and ceiling Concrete wall 3'0" up from slab WI (3)2x12 HDR V (3)1 3M" x 9 1/2" HDR 2sava &mt.% 1 r rir 5.-2 1/2 (2)1 314"x 912" MDR "Zt Office and front elevallon windows (E) 80" to t main floor wind A g a gf were: 12/11/2018 sCALE: 1/1".1.0. MEV\ A-3 5' 8" 7'-1" 3,7" —1— 1/2' 1,7'2,4 1/2" 4' 9 11 r 8,11 112" TAT-- 6' 3" 13' 10 /2" -3 Bedroom 11'6 Bedroom *3 1==.1 Bench lie 9 12_J v.+ D - - - - 12 10'•81/2" 2,1 3,10 1/2" 3'-10 1/2" 2,4 1/2" 10' 5' 11 47' 0" 11: 12 Bedroom 7,4 112"—.- Tempered 1-<-2 to 8rt =V iV - DATE: 1211112010 SCALE: 1/4..1.9° SHEET: A-4 g .i g' .rg' U •.....(2) 2010 HDR UNO ',Header spans up to 3'11" Trimmer, 4'0" and bigger -2 Trimmers UNO CS-WSP Continuously sheathed wood structural panel, min. 3/8" thickness 11 0 I 111111111 11111111 El West South Window maximum U factor .32 Window fall protection is required where the lowest part or the opening Is located more than 72" above finished floor. Operable sections of windows shah not permit openings that at passage of a 4" diameter sphere where such openings are located within 36. of the finished floor. Standard Roof Vents To Code R-49 Insulation Manufactured Roof Trusses b% 75" Energy Heel 0513 WI Clips 1/2" Standard Asphalt Shinges Installed Over 158 Felt With Deck Dry On All Overhangs Ice and water protection first 6' 142.5A Hurricane Cop Save baffle adJ. to vents per R402.2.3 4 Mil Poly Vapor Ventilated Alum. Soffit barrier VT Drywall o 1/01. 21:6" Studs gp 16"o.c. R20 Fiberglass Insulation 1/2" PI1150001 Lap Siding Over House Wrap 24" Floor Trusses @ 19.2" O.C. tr 6/4' TBG Subfloor PORCH P30 Spray Foam@ Rim and cantilever (3)2X10 Beam 6.46 Treated Post I 1 i /1"*.1111.-ri III WEIL IIWEAZar' 1 kr.ift . m Ilpii , ii Rebar . Every 2' From Fooling Into Wall 0 lim Irl WRAPPED AROUND DRAIN GRAVEL FILTERING MATERIAL FABRIC IT111111111"-L_TIFILrli N "rill'? COARSE GRAVEL SURROUND FILL 1111- 8,8 • ,- Exterior drain tile Drain Tile to Surnp Basket and Pump 8" X 20" CONCRETE FOOTING 1/2 Plywood Sheathing TREATED 2x6 SILL PLATE SILL SEALER Treated 2x6 Sill Plate. Connect w/ 1/2" Dla. Sill Plate Bolts within 12" from each corner and 4'0" O.C. throughout R15 Rigid Foam Polystyrene with a 6 MII Poly Slip Rebar Vertically Placed 27" O.C. VAPOR BARRIER REINFORCING STEEL AS REQUIRED 4" CONCRETE 6 Mt Vapor and Radon Border 8" Poured Concrete Wall 4" GRAVEL BASE COMPACTED SOIL 24" ft Floor Trusses gp 19.2" O.C. II I I 12" footing belled to 16" @ base I I -Minimum depth of 5'0" , Concrete Slab —0 DATE: 12/11/2018 SCALE: 1/4,1.0. SHEET: A-7 11101ECT DOlIPT1ON: DRAWINGS PROVIDED BY: 0111311 DrecIng Servka Wesdn Nm Canstsvdlon 3501 W 50111 51. d 0 s, 4501 nilen %A Ga HInneRpols, HO 55410 Edina, 191 55424 (95214544705 .0141) Stirllt, 41l111(1. f. 5 SNEET1TYLE: Raaf Pushes 'ulna OHM SOLZ4SHZ56) 11.55 1614403 .41,11123 [MSS NM tiod...01 Al ......0 100 s p o IS 4105 M an MI...* ...N .4./A 31.31'03 E.PJ.CI MA) :AO 0301A0.153511.414 ./41.1a10430 1.1-1001fd sa1ipads.ipeepo5460,1 :31LLL 133115 O • 1-4-1 h 1,1 • LA---) Uo ),,..L)--17 G o_s i • 1}--) 4 S / lg l8 60 CERT /CITE OF Se/RVEY .POR: efilifeES .1.40 ELLEN- irEsri-iv. ~5O/ a4RAY50/17 LANA; 1 CCG 1 e CO \ \ 732 / 0.WALL 'TR ;94lsk 9 1 $5.99c <9' —/ PLA) \ FOQ ND _-- \ „ ( ha Lo < o ., II (._) c-.9 " DO IP U- C 0 Y \ m Z LU 1-,,C0 \ /1 z \ /1 a / (/) \- 92 9 0. O. _----- — 6‘c.. _ le -------- < 0 / / WOODDALE AVENUE o,. I .,.,..,„ / .22 9. ob __-----.19-6.<0 ‘?:: / it / .1B0-.7...5,%,--N ,-/ „AD \ 1 ,5, -w1,--- . I. x / ..,- — _6,------ / i ,/ I' '---. "'--- ' A0 /// /1 ,,,,.. ...---.--A., .e/- ,o, .... x _,-x---",, Ei: 6 / .%...-- ‘Pf'.9. ,-. -- -- -- ''';' Pi / / / --...„ L'....„_. 2 6TH p(o 0, _____. x ..„,,,3 , Z P `/ ol- ,,.. .., ---. -to' — ....-- _....— O. ,,.......------- /...• a.9. ....".- -•.--". s'-'---. .,'" --- -..- s' X ',,.„....../..„.....--'' .....'- <::.,,, ,,.' 0: 90 6:N :,_ .....„. .....A,: to Z u] /3r" 'r.9.-;,9 6'.,-, 6'. ar'4., •„9 CD 0 }-- (/) CY)z. t, / 9.9. ,061, 'Po,. 4" 6 (n= s),,,, .„, ,o,.9 Lt1 1 00,9 ‘2•90 6,„ 0?` \ SSBx 46, Z. 9 9'99x /9, 9 I '9`P,96, ''.9,99 "094,, 0;6' x 12„,. 9 10 FOUND SPIKE NO0'00'0 K9 x \ 0. 0 1.3Z .29 0 0 LEGEND -6- • . . . FIRE HYDRANT . . . WATER VALVE O . . . MANHOLE . . . CATCH BASIN 0 . . . POWERPOLE . . . LIGHT POLE . . . . TRANSFORMER [El . . . . ELECTRIC METER IS7 . . . . TV PEDESTAL EH . . . . TELEPHONE PEDESTAL . . . . AIR CONDITIONER [91 . HAND HOLE 0 . . . . SEMAPHORE . . . . GAS METER S . . SANITARY SEWER ST . . . . STORM SEWER W . . WATERMAIN G . . . UNDERGROUND GAS MAIN T . . . UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE E . . . . UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TV . . . UNDERGROUND CABLE T.V. OU . . . . OVERHEAD nun' UNES e . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET aR . . . EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION . . . . SOIL BORING , . . SIGN G .... DECIDUOUS TREE -40.... CONIFEROUS TREE . . DENOTES TREE AND BRUSH UMRS . . . DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE ARROW (944.00). . . DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION FrAl OFSCRIPTION- Lot 5, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION according to plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. DATE SY DESCRIPTiON sole FEET 1 HERE.' CCIITI, THAT 711.- SURVEY.1.1.4N. Oil REPORT P^ PARED DV ME OR ND .1• 0 7,1iltg A L4rZI , T o r THAT AM A DULY LICCNSCP IANDSURVEYOR UNDERTHLAIVS PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE LAND SURVEYING SERVICES CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LOT 5, BLOCK 2 MILLER ADDITION EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN L,sIGNEIS TSP DRAWN TSP CHECKED TSP ON LEGEND . . . . GAS METER . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . . . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET . . EXISTING ELEVATION (922.0) . . PROPOSED ELEVATION ®CS.... CURB STOP 0 . . . . MANHOLE . . . CATCH BASIN 0 . . . POWERPOLE G .... DECIDUOUS TREE . CONIFEROUS TREE . . BUSH . . PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL J FGAL DESCRIPTION. Lot 5, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION according to plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: HOUSE: Basement T.O. Slab 868.3 1st Floor 879.03 2nd Floor 890.09 GARAGE: T.O. Slab 873.5 Existing Garage FFE = 874.3 SFT PACK RFOUIREMENTS• 20' FRONT BUILDING TO ROW (WOODDALE) 35' SIDE BUILDING TO ROW (GARRISON) 10' SIDE BUILDING TO EAST PROP LINE 50' SIDE BUILDING TO OHWL AREA CALCULATIONS' LOT = 13,444 SQUARE FEET HOUSE/GARAGE/DRIVE = 2950 SQUARE FEET % HARDCOVER = 21.9% (drainage colts only) GYA:R.771-7.7C,4_77.Z ZZ.ZZ/V . KZ:57M/ 150/ or FETSi.p1=Nr,======.,, PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE LAND SURVEYING SERVICES 12-14-1R KB KB CRYCOMMWS DATE BY CHK DESCNIYI ION SHEET 1 WOODDALE AVENUE 0 Asa rn cci to co co 00 /A VP13S 400 cs 62, „ A. O. (156.40 PLAT) O L5` V--c0 61' Lu z 0 u) 62 0 0 II WI srA~e reel CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY LOT 5, BLOCK 2 MILLER ADDITION EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN pesIGN,o DKAWN Tsv CF1hCKhD 15P DATE: January 23, 2019 TO: Cary Teague — Planning Director FROM: Charles Gerk, PE — Graduate Engineer RE: 4501 Garrison Lane - Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the proposed site plan dated 12/03/18 and the stormwater management plan date 12/14/18. Grading and Drainage Grading for the proposed work will closely match existing drainage paths. Drainage will be directed to Garrison Lane and Wooddale Ave in the front of the property, in the rear of the property drainage will be directed to the adjacent pond. The proposed stormwater management plan does not propose any additional drainage to neighboring private properties and the public infrastructure on Garrison Lane and Wooddale Ave has capacity to accept the runoff. Stormwater Mitigation City of Edina Building Policy SP-003 does not require stormwater mitigation for this project, however it does require a stormwater management plan. The applicant is proposing using graded swales to control any existing and proposed run off as described in the grading and drainage section above. Flood Plain The subject site is located in a localized 1% annual chance flood plain which has an identified base flood elevation of 866.3'. City of Edina code requires the low floor elevation for redeveloped lots to be no less than 2' above the base flood elevation. For this property the regulatory elevations require the low floor elevation to be no less than 868.3'. The subject property has a proposed a low floor elevation of 868.3'. No fill is proposed in the flood plain. Erosion and Sediment Control No Comments Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required if the applicant proposed replacing or relocating existing curb cut. Public Utilities No Comments Other Items A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit will be required. A final grade as-built survey and inspection will be required to verify compliance with the approved stormwater plan. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard • Edina, Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-826-0371 • Fax 952-826-0392 LEGEND • . . . GAS METER e . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET 92.%P. . . EXISTING ELEVATION (922.0) . . . PROPOSED ELEVATION ®CS.. . . CURB STOP 0 . . . . MANHOLE ,571:774 GY_R,1_,a11176Y A110 ZA70.(5770117 CO_NZROZ 150/ CAWAYS0117 L411/2' ZOZAC4, 'kW ea . . CATCH BASIN WOODDALE AVENUE O . . . POWERPOLE G . . DECIDUOUS TREE . . . CONIFEROUS TREE BUSH •_ . . PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL ---- DENOTES SILT FENCE FLOW ARROW PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: HOUSE: Basement T.O. Slab 868.3 1st Floor 879.03 2nd Floor 890.09 GARAGE: T.O. Slab 873.5 Existing Garage FFE = 874.3 SET BACK RFOUIRFMENTS. 20' FRONT BUILDING TO ROW (WOODDALE) 35' SIDE BUILDING TO ROW (GARRISON) 10' SIDE BUILDING TO EAST PROP LINE 50' SIDE BUILDING TO OHWL AREA CALCULATIONS: LOT = 13,444 SQUARE FEET HOUSE/GARAGE/DRIVE = 2950 SQUARE FEET % HARDCOVER = 21.9% (drainage calcs only) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 5, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION according to plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. NOTE: 1. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. 2. PROPOSED HOUSE WILL BE FIELD STAKED AFTER DEMO OF EXISTING HOUSE. 4. UTILITY CONNECTIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AT THIS TIME, SURVEYOR WILL OBTAIN ASBUILT INFORMATION FROM CITY AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY. 5. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED BELOW ELEVATION 966.3 PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE SITE DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Engineers and Surveyors / ,c) 00 L 371 B7 -------- ° D. of II _J L121 S75b / c55 c5j cp.> 68'9 _4.2_ 73. O. (156.40 PLAT) / 5 z z CD 00 CD DATE SY CHI< DESCRIPTION 12-}4.,H KR N@ CITY CONV.U.NYS SCALE veer 1 HTNE3T CERTIFY TMATTMIS PIAN. 3PECINCATION. OK REPORT WAS PREPARED HY ML Oft MOCK MY DIRECT .1UPERVI,ION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED PROKSSIONAL BNOIN3P31. UNDER THE LAW,. OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 1,03,010 AE5(ANLU It N30 SITE, GRADING, EC FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2 MILLER ADDITION EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN 5770R./liK4.7ZR _POZZ -.77.70.7V- _PAY WZ-71V77.1.0./V JD./ (,57K_P_PyV SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: 1. Implement sediment control practices in order to minimize sediment from entering surface waters, Including curb and gutter systems and storm drain Inlets. 2. Install all temporary or permanent sediment control measures including silt fence at perimeter of construction, rock construction entrances, sediment filters, silt socks, and sedimentation basins prior to beginning site clearing, grading, or other land-disturbing activity. 3. Establish sediment control practices on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disturbing activities begin. These practices must be Installed before the next precipitation event even= lithe short-term activity is not complete. 4. The timing of the installation of sediment control practices may be adjusted in order to accommodate short-term activities, but sediment control practices must be Installed before the next precipitation event even If the short-term activity Is not complete. 5. If the down gradient treatment system becomes overloaded, Install additional up gradient sediment control practices or redundant BMPs In order to eliminate the overloading. 6. Before beginning construction, Install a TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE at each point where vehicles exit the construction site. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2inch) diameter rock, MNDOT Standard Specification 31.37 CA-1, CA-2. CA-3. Or equal Coarse Aggregate. Place the aggregate In a layer at least 152 mm (6 Inches) thick across the entire width of the entrance. Extend the rock entrance at least 15 m (50 feet) into the construction zone. Use MNDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material beneath the aggregate in order to prevent migration of soil Into the rock from below. Maintain the entrance M a condition that will prevent tracking or flowing of sediment onto paved roadways. Provide periodic top dressing with additional stone as required. Close entrances protected by temporary rock construction entrances to all construction traffic. 7. If necessary, clean the wheels of construction vehicles in order to remove sails before the vehicles leave the construction site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains Into an approved sediment trapping device. 8. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall be on a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep, if necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material toe suitable disposal area. Street washing is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 9. Soil Stockpiles: Install silt fence or other effective sediment controls around all temporary soil stockpiles. Locate soil or dirt stockpiles such that downslope drainage length is no less than 8 m (25 feet) from the toe of the pile to a surface water, including Stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, or conduits sand ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the Stormwater. If remaining for more than 7 days, stabilize the stockpiles by mulching, vegetative cover, tarps, or other means. During street repair, cover construction soil or dirt stockpiles located closer than 8 m (25 feet) to a roadway or drainage channel with tarps, and protect storm sewer Inlets with silt socks or staked silt fence. 10. Slit Fence: Install slit fence along the contour (on a level horizontal plane) with the ends tamed up (1-hooks) in order to help pond water behind the fence. Install the silt fence on the uphill side of the support posts. Provide a post spacing of 1.2 m (4 feet) or less. Drive posts at least 0.6 m (2 feet) Into the ground. Anchor the silt fence fabric in a trench at least 152 mm (6 inches) deep and 152 mm (6 Inches) wide dug on the upslepe side of the support posts. Lay the fabric in the trench and then backfill and compact with a vibratory plate compactor. Make any splices in the fabric ata fence post. At splices, overlap the fabric at least 152 mm IR inches), fold it over, and securely fasten it to the fencepost Silt fence supporting posts shall be 51 mm (2 inch) square or larger hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- or U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb. per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet), Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage. Geoterdile fabric shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, furnished in a continuous roll In order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform in texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray Inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 11. Maintain all temporary erosion and sediment control devices in place until the contributing drainage area has been stabilized (hard-surfaced areas paved and vegetation established Ina greenspace). Repair any rifling, gully formation, or washouts. After final establishment of permanent stabilization, remove all temporary synthetic, structural, and nonbiodegradable erosion and sediment control devices and any accumulated sediments. Dispose of off-site. Restore permanent sedimentation basins to their design condition Immediately following stabilization of the site. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE: 1. Inspect the entire construction site at least once every 7 days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than OS Inches in a 24-hour period. Following an Inspection that occurs within 24 hours after a rainfall event, the next Inspection must be conducted within 7 days after that rainfall event. 2. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs, Infiltration areas, and stabilized areas. 3. Record all inspections and maintenance conducted during construction in writing and keep these records. The inspections and maintenance records must include date and time of Inspections, date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 0.5 inches in a 240hour period, name of person(s) conducting inspections, findings of inspections, recommendations for corrective actions, and any corrective actions taken. 4. Inspect all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs in order to ensure integrity and effectiveness. Repair, replace, or supplement any nonfunctional BM with functional BMPs within 24 hours after discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access unless another time frame Is specified. 5. Remove accumulated sediment deposits from behind erosion and sediment control devices as needed. Do not allow sediment to accumulate to a depth of more than one-third of the height of the erosion and sediment control devices. Repair, replace, or supplement deteriorated, damaged, rotted, or missing erosion control devices within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 6. Repair, replace, or supplement all silt fences when they become nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the fence. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery, or as soon as Said conditions allow access. 7. Clean sedimentation basins, storm sewer catch basins, ditches, and other drainage facilities as required In order to maintain their effectiveness. Temporary and permanent sedimentation basins must be drained and they sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected In the basin reaches 34 of the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours, or as soon as field conditions allow access. 8. Inspect surface waters (Including drainage ditches and conveyance systems) evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. Remove all deltas and sediment deposited. Stabilize areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must be completed within 7 days of discovery unless precluded by legal, regulatory, or physical access constraints, If precluded, removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of obtaining access. 9. Inspect construction site vehicle exit locations for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Remove all soils and sediments tracked or otherwise deposited onto adjacent property, pavement areas, sidewalks, streets, and alleys. Removal shall been a daily basis throughout the duration of the construction. Clean paved roadways by shoveling or wet-sweeping. Do not dry sweep. If necessary, scrape paved surfaces in order to loosen compacted sediment material prior to sweeping. Haul sediment material to a suitable disposal area. Street washing Is allowed only after sediment has been removed by shoveling or sweeping. 10. Perform any corrective measures ordered by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. Install any additional erosion protection or sediment control measures deemed necessary by the City or Watershed District within 24 hours of notification. POLLUTION PREVEINTION MEASURES: 1. Solid Waste: Dispose of collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, construction and demolition debris, and other waste properly off-site in compliance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. 2. Hazardous Materials: Properly store oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances in order to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Include secondary containment. Restrict access to storage areas In orderto prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous materials must be in compliance with MPCA regulations, 3. Other Materials: Dispose of unused building materials, garbage, trash, cleaning wastes, toxic materials, and wastewater properly off-site and in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements. 4. Furnish suitable trash containers and regularly remove the accumulated trash from the premises. 5. Do not allow solid waste, hazardous materials, and other materials to be carried by runoff into a receiving water or storm sewer system. 6. Limit external washing of trucks and other construction vehicles to a defined area of the site. Wash vehicles only on an area stabilized with stone that drains into an approved sediment trapping device. Contain runoff and properly dispose of waste. Engine degreasing Is prohibited. 7. Concrete Washout Operations: Contain all liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations Ina leak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. Do not allow the liquid and solid wastes to contact the ground. Prevent runoff from the concrete washout operations or areas. Dispose of liquid and solid wastes properly In compliance with MPCA regulations. Install a sign adjacent to each washout facility in order te inform concrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities. 8. Sanitary and Septic Waste: Furnish and install detached portable toilet facilities at the construction site, The portable toilets shall be conveniently located for the use of all workers on the project. Maintain the facilities in a clean, dry, sanitary condition in accordance with MN Dept of Health requirements. SOIL STABILIZATION: 1. Water and maintain seeded or sodded areas on a timely day-to-day basis. In the event of a seeding failure, reseed and remuich the areas where the original seed has failed to grow and perform additional watering as necessary at no additional cost to the Owner. Promptly replace all sod that dries out to the point where It Is presumed dead and all sod that has been damaged, displaced, weakened, or heavily infested with weeds at no additional cost to the Owner. EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES: 1. Delineate the location of areas not to be disturbed (e.g. with flags, stakes, signs, silt fence, etc) on the development site before work begins. 2. Avoid removal of trees and surface vegetation wherever possible. Schedule construction in order to expose the smallest practical area of sail at any given time. Implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetative buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. 3. Following Initial soil disturbance or redisturbance, complete permanent or temporary stabilization against erosion due to rain, wind, and running water as soon as possible, but in no case later than 14 calendar days, on all disturbed or graded areas including Stormwater management pond skieslopes. This requirement does not apply to those areas that are currently being used for material storage or for those areas on which grading, site building, er other construction activities are actively underway. 4. Provide temporary grass seed cover on all topsoil stockpiles and other areas of stockpiled excavated material in ardente prevent soil erosion and rapid runoff during the construction period. Prolonged periods of open, bare earth without grass cover will not be permitted. Stabilize all disturbed greeenspace areas with a minimum of 4" topsoil immediately after final subgrade completion. Seed and mulch, or sod and stake these areas within 48 hours after completion of final grading work (weather permitting). 5. Stabilize all disturbed areas to be paved using early application of gravel base. 6. Apply necessary moisture to the construction area in ardente prevent the spread of dust. MATERIALS: 1. Storm Sewer Inlet Protection: The following are approved Inlet sediment control devices: a Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 23 (fits rough opening for 2'x3' Inlet), Road Drain Top Slab Model RD 27 (fits rough opening for 27" Inlet), Or Road Drain Top Slab Model CG 3067 (fits Wane Casting with 35-1/4" x 17-3/4" dimensions) manufactured by WMCO, 799 Theis Drive, Shakopee, MN, 55379, Phone (952) 233-3055. b. Silt Sock: Regular flow (40 gal/min/sq. ft.) Average width strength equal to 165.0 lbs/In, ASTM D-4884. Rectangular siltsock on rectangular inlets. Round siltsock on round inlets. Use ACF Environmental, Inc., 2831 cardwell Road, Richmond, VA 23284, Phone (800) 448-3636, or approved equal. c. InfraSafe Sediment Control Barrier. install geotextile sock en the outside of the barrier In order to trap additional fines. Standard frames are available to fit 24" to 30" diameter and 2'03' openings. Distributed by ROYAL ENTERPRISES AMERICA, 30622 Forest Boulevard, Stacy, MN 55079, Phone (651) 462-2130. 2. Topsoil: Topsoil used for finish grading of areas to be turfed or planted shall meet the requirements of MnDOT Standard Specifications 3877 for topsoil borrow modified to contain no more than 3555 sand. Topsoil shall be reasonably free of subsoil, heavy clay, coarse sand, stones, and other objects over 51 mm (2 inches) in diameter, and without plants, roots, sticks, and other objectionable material. 3. Geotextile Fabric for Subgrade Stabilization (If required): MnDOT Standard Specification 373 Type V permeable geotextile material. 4. Supporting Posts for Silt fence: 51 mm (2 inch) square or lamer hardwood, pine, or standard T- or U-section steel posts. T- on U-section steel posts shall weigh not less than 1.8602 kg per meter (1.25 lb per lineal foot). Posts shall have a minimum length of 1524 mm (5 feet). Posts shall have projections to facilitate fastening the fabric and prevent slippage, 5. Silt Fence Fabric: MnDOT Standard Specification 3886 for preassembled silt fence, famished in a continuous roll in order to avoid splices. Geotextile fabric shall be uniform in texture and appearance and have no defects, flaws, or tears. The fabric shall contain sufficient ultraviolet (UV) ray inhibitor and stabilizers to provide a minimum two-year service life outdoors. Fabric color shall be international orange. 6. Aggregate For Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 7. Geotextile Fabric for Temporary Rock Construction Entrance: MnDOT Standard Specification 3733 Type V permeable geotextile fabric material. 8. Aggregate for Block and Rock Sediment Filter: 25 mm (1 inch) to SO Trim (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. 9. Block and Rock Inlet Filters: Block and Rock Inlet Filters consist of open-core concrete masonry blocks, wire screen with 12 mm (0.5 Inch) openings, and washed rock. Place open-core concrete masonry blocks lengthwise on their sides around the catchbasin inlet. Place wire screen around the perimeter to the top of the block barrier before the rock is placed. The screen prevents the rocks from being washed through blocks. Place rock against wire mesh to top of blocks. Use 25 mm (1 inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter rock, MnDOT Standard Specification 3137 CA-1, CA-2, or CA-3 Coarse Aggregate or equal. Install two courses of El" block to forma barrier height of 16" 10. Biodegradable Erosion Control Blankets: In accordance with MnDOT Standard Specifications 3885. 11. Erosion Control Matting: LandLok TRM 450 Turf Reinforcement Mat manufactured by Propex, Inc. (www.geotextlie.com <http://www.geotextile.com>), or approved equal soil erosion control matting. 12. Staples: Staples used to anchor erosion control blankets shall be U-shaped, 3mm diameter of heavier steel wire. The span width at the crown shall be a minimum of 25 mm (1 Inch). Staples shall have a length of 250 mm (10 inches) or more from the top to bottom after bending. 20 SULE FEET ne lav PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. SWPPP FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2 EXE, DRAWN COMPLETE SITE DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES MILLER ADDITION Cs2 OF LIILLHED EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Engineers and Surveyors „„.„, oo,otn nioch 49E00 12-01-20,n ,5770R27/X.21.77ZR PaZiZW_771-0_47 17A3ZW27/1717.70/1/- .P.Z.A1V (5K17.1717) IIIIIII / V :9; • 4 041 *0 40 R. .. 0,e,,..1 5 % 0, wee... I IS 015 2,015 AND STAPLED &°,51%," 7,72T, UE.'"' ,,..... 9P RM (5 r•Tc,',%'")""Th'' ,--P,„„°Ns.TALTEN6GN: ,5„g: SPACING 4t, qz, ,, „.—n)a_E FABRIC, • -' <1:>,,..,Sb Etc> , 11 it. lip e o.... ,... .,,, 1,,,, ''',. .,,, 4'Z> DIRECTION OF RUNOFF' PLOT! ' .12. Vt-AVED"IW /2" GESTE/OLE SIZE SHALL BE IP MIN. GREATER ON ALL STIES OF THE INLET Cov.. PLACE CEDTUTILE UNDER INLET COVER. IM ° a'gg`4%'77`g°4 TypE c SPE. 3801 SHALL NEST 011111' 0 11 IA I I.DOONS ID" DEPTH D. rup DESIGN GUIDELINES: MAXIMUM CONTRIBUING AREA: 3 ACRES k P SLIM 85 - ( PLUS 1 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TYPE C INLET PROTECTION STANDARD MACHINE SLICED SILT FENCE --H ..-- ma. (MN.) P. OVERLAP MOMS 7 KH V ',NAM,- .1 / ---rat----, / I' SPACING ON STAPLES `ellilliar / OLD it DER r EROSION CONTROL BLANKET REV. NO. 0 2ist HEAMY CERTIFY MIA IS PLAN, SPECIFICATION. on REPORT WAO, ERMA= DT MC OR UNOCIt Lug,elgvl ,.,,,,, sEgir I NM A DUET LiorNSKO PROFESSIONAL PNOilIPER UNDER THE L*RIGNZO KLE PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE SITE DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Engineers and Surveyors SWPPP FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2 slim- C3 . Kin OF MILLER ADDITION Mie SCALP FEET CHECKED Km EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN Ems VO'HIP I. PI 4555, LL, 17-1,1,111a PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. 4501 GARRISON LANE Edina, MN STORM WATER NARRATIVE PREPARED BY: KRYSTLE BLOCH, MN PE 49893 December 14, 2018 Land Services Complete CMI Engineering & Land Surveying Services P.O. Box 839 Faribault, MN 55021 Ph: 507-291-1137 Fax: 507-334-9472 ptsland.com 4501 GARRISON LANE 12/14/18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 3 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 3 CALCULATIONS 4 APPENDIX A — EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN MAP APPENDIX B — EXISTING HYDROCAD APPENDIX C — PROPOSED DRAINAGE BASIN MAP APPENDIX D— PROPOSED HYDROCAD Storm Water Narrative Page j 2 4501 GARRISON LANE 12/14/18 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The existing site is located at 4501 Garrison Lane in the City of Edina in Henepin County, Minnesota. The site drainage currently sends site runoff to the existing front yard (Garrison Lane), the east side (Wooddale Avenue) and to the backyard (Lake). The existing lot contains a single family home and driveway. The amount of existing impervious is approximately 2928 square feet (22%). The USDA Soils Map did not seem to have accurate information for this small area, so a uniform soil type was selected, and B soils were used in the HydroCAD model for the sake of producing comparative runoff information. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed lot contains a new home and new driveway area. The new driveway will be to Wooddale Avenue rather than the existing driveway to Garrison Lane. The amount of proposed impervious is 2950 square feet (22%). This number is not to be confused with the lot coverage calculations show on Architectural sheets. The directions of proposed drainage are similar to the existing lot. JURISDICTIONAL BODIES AND REQUIREMENTS Runoff Rates: Runoff rate must be less or equal to the existing rates for the 2-, 10-, and 100- year rainfall events, using the following design storms: Rainfall Frequency Rainfall (inches) 2-Year, 24- Hour 2.86 10-Year, 24-Hour 4.26 100- Year, 24-Hour 7.32 Appendix B & D shows that the NRCS methodology of HydroCAD was used to provide stormwater modeling on this site for the existing and proposed conditions respectively. CALCULATIONS Existing Site and Proposed Discharge Rates The proposed site provides a discharge rate that does not exceed the existing rates for the 2, 10, and 100-Year Storm Events. EXISTING FLOWS TO N (BASIN 1S) TO E (BASIN 2S) TO S (BASIN 3S) TOTAL OUTFLOW Rainfall Frequency Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) 2-Year, 24-Hour 0.11 0.03 0.12 0.3 10-Year, 24-Hour 0.23 0.08 0.36 0.7 100-Year, 24-Hour 0.54 0.19 1.05 1.8 PROPOSED FLOWS TO W (BASIN 1S) TO E (BASIN 2S) TO S (BASIN 3S) TOTAL OUTFLOW Rainfall Frequency Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) Discharge Rate (cfs) 2-Year, 24-Hour 0.08 0.09 0.10 0.3 10-Year, 24-Hour 0.20 0.16 0.31 0.7 100-Year, 24-Hour 0.50 0.32 0.93 1.8 Storm Water Narrative Page 3 WOODDALE AVENUE 0 / 0 160,73- -iv O ` LL ')z $5.99 --- FOUND SPIKE el 114la \ -co rnl - / / e U') co FOUND SPIKE NO0'00'010 (2. wp 0 co PLAT) ---- -SC/1705'50"W LEGEND .... GAS METER e . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . . . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET A OA. . . EXISTING ELEVATION (922.0) . . PROPOSED ELEVATION . . . CURB STOP O. . . . MANHOLE TM . . . CATCH BASIN 0 . . . . POWERPOLE . . DECIDUOUS TREE . . CONIFEROUS TREE . BUSH . . . PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL --- DENOTES TREE PRESERVATION FENCE DENOTES SILT FENCE FLOW ARROW LEGAL DESCRIPTION' Lot 5, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION according to plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: HOUSE: Basement T.O. Slab 9XX Existing T.O. Block House 9XX 1st Floor 9XX 2nd Floor 9XX GARAGE: T.O. Slab 9XX SET BACK REQUIREMENTS' 20' FRONT BUILDING TO ROW (WOODDALE) 35' SIDE BUILDING TO ROW (GARRISON) 10' SIDE BUILDING TO EAST PROP LINE 50' SIDE BUILDING TO OHWL AREA CALCULATIONS' LOT = XX,XXX SQUARE FEET HOUSE/GARAGE/DRIVE/WALK = XXX.O % HARDCOVER = XX% (drainage calcs only) *THESE NUMBERS ARE USED FOR DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AND ARE NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE CALCS FOUND ON ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS sire; GANG .4./vn EROSION CONTROL 4'50/ a4AWL5'0.11/- L4./17.47 27.01:/Vel, 0 -7- MEL 1. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. 2. PROPOSED HOUSE WILL BE FIELD STAKED AFTER DEMO OF EXISTING HOUSE. 4. UTILITY CONNECTIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AT THIS TIME, SURVEYOR WILL OBTAIN ASBUILT INFORMATION FROM CITY AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY. 5. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED BELOW ELEVATION 966.3 ClbSIGNFID DRAWN PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE SITE DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Engineers and Surveyors SITE, GRADING, EC FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2 MILLER ADDITION EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SGL 1.0,10 L Nogh R.fll. nnaol 05,n,0,8 TO NORTH/GARRISON <2S) K3S) TO SOUTH/LAKE TO EAST/WOODDALE Routing Diagram for EXIST DRNG westin Prepared by {enter your company name here), Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 4Iaca Reach EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2. 86" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff 0.11 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.006 af, Depth= 0.92" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 1,365 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 2,069 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 3,434 76 Weighted Average 2,069 60.25% Pervious Area 1,365 39.75% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EAST/VVOODDALE Runoff = 0.03 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.002 af, Depth= 0.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 408 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 900 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,308 73 Weighted Average 900 68.81% Pervious Area 408 31.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.008 af, Depth= 0.48" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 1,155 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 7,547 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 8,702 66 Weighted Average 7,547 86.73% Pervious Area 1,155 13.27% Impervious Area EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2. 86" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 'IS: TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff 0.23 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.013 af, Depth= 1.94" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 1,365 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 2,069 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 3,434 76 Weighted Average 2,069 60.25% Pervious Area 1,365 39.75% Impervious Area Tc (min) 10.0 Runoff Length (feet) Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EASTNVOODDALE 0.08 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.004 af, Depth= 1.72" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 1 0-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 408 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 900 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,308 73 Weighted Average 900 68.81% Pervious Area 408 31.19% Impervious Area To Length (min) (feet) 10.0 Runoff Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE 0.36 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Depth= 1.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) 1,155 7,547 8,702 7,547 1,155 CN Description 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 66 Weighted Average 86.73% Pervious Area 13.27% Impervious Area EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 FlydroCADO 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff = 0.54 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.030 af, Depth= 4.54" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" CN Description 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 76 Weighted Average 60.25% Pervious Area 39.75% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EASTANOODDALE 0.19 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.011 af, Depth= 4.21" Area (sf) 1,365 2,069 3,434 2,069 1,365 Tc Length (min) (feet) 10.0 Runoff Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) 408 900 1,308 900 408 CN Description 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 73 Weighted Average 68.81% Pervious Area 31.19% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE Runoff = 1.05 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, Depth= 3.46" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN 1,155 98 7,547 61 8,702 66 7,547 1,155 Description Impervious Bldg, Gravel >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B Weighted Average 86.73% Pervious Area 13.27% Impervious Area EXIST DRNG westin MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 10/8/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, RETAINING WALL TOP = BOTTOM = Ld z 0 U) F2E PT OLD o3 0 0 LI) tc-3 oo UT trd 155.99 FOUND SPIKE FOUND SPIKE NOTO0'00' --' (156.40 PLAT) WOODDALE AVENUE OS a) 117 cc N89'44'00"W IM O LEGEND . . . . GAS METER 9 . . . . IRON MONUMENT FOUND . . . IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET 0..\ . . EXISTING ELEVATION (9224 . PROPOSED ELEVATION OG5. . . CURB STOP O . . . MANHOLE . . . . CATCH BASIN 0 . . . . POWERPOLE G . . . . DECIDUOUS TREE . . . CONIFEROUS TREE . . . RUSH . . PROPOSED TREE REMOVAL —— DENOTES TREE PRESERVATION FENCE DENOTES SILT FENCE FLOW ARROW LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Lot 5, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION according to plat thereof, on file and of record in the Office of the Hennepin County Recorder. PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: HOUSE: Basement T.O. Slab 868.3 1st Floor 879.03 2nd Floor 890.09 GARAGE: T.O. Slab 873.5 Existing Garage FFE = 874.3 SET BACK REQUIREMENTS* 20' FRONT BUILDING TO ROW (WOODDALE) 35' SIDE BUILDING TO ROW (GARRISON) 10' SIDE BUILDING TO EAST PROP LINE 50' SIDE BUILDING TO OHWL AREA CALCULATIONS: LOT = 13,444 SQUARE FEET HOUSE/GARAGE/DRIVE = 2950 SQUARE FEET % HARDCOVER = 21.9% (drainage colas only) $7:7747 GYA'44.1-./1767 2,1 ZROSY0.47 CONY:AWL- 1501 C.A.RAYSON" Z 1A2 27,0Z/Vil, NOTE: 1. SEE BUILDING PLANS FOR ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DIMENSION & EXTENT OF BLDG PAD SOILS CORRECTION, IF ANY. 2. PROPOSED HOUSE WILL BE FIELD STAKED AFTER DEMO OF EXISTING HOUSE. 4. UTILITY CONNECTIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AT THIS TIME, SURVEYOR WILL OBTAIN ASBUILT INFORMATION FROM CITY AND REVISE ACCORDINGLY. 5. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED BELOW ELEVATION 966.3 tHERMYc01,01F,MATIMM,..sPecmuTorv,oftR[PciuwAsmeMRFORYMORUNDER ======AMADMYLMM.PMOMSSMMLMMMUl'MMATHE /et PTS LAND SERVICES, INC. COMPLETE SITE DESIGN AND LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Engineers and Surveyors SITE, GRADING, EC FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2 MILLER ADDITION EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN SCALE FeEr ;nee* OF OF TO NORTH/GARRISON (2S TO SOUTH/LAKE TO EAST/WOODDALE Routing Diagram for PROP DRNG westin 121418 Prepared by {enter your company name here}, Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC ubc Reach PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff = 0.08 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.005 af, Depth= 0.68" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 990 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 2,776 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 3,766 71 Weighted Average 2,776 73.71% Pervious Area 990 26.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EAST/WOODDALE Runoff = 0.09 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.005 af, Depth= 1.47" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) 1,116 604 1,720 604 1,116 Tc Length (min) (feet) 10.0 Runoff = CN Description 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 85 Weighted Average 35.12% Pervious Area 64.88% Impervious Area Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE 0.10 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth= 0.44" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Area (sf) CN Description 844 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 7,114 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 7,958 65 Weighted Average 7,114 89.39% Pervious Area 844 10.61% Impervious Area PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 2-Year Rainfall=2.86" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff 0.20 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.011 af, Depth= 1.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 990 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 2,776 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 3,766 71 Weighted Average 2,776 73.71% Pervious Area 990 26.29% Impervious Area Tc Length (min) (feet) 10.0 Runoff Slope Velocity Capacity Description (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EAST/VVOODDALE 0.16 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.009 af, Depth= 2.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 1,116 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 604 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,720 85 Weighted Average 604 35.12% Pervious Area 1,116 64.88% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE Runoff = 0.31 cfs @ 12.19 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 1.18" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Area (sf) CN Description 844 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 7,114 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 7,958 65 Weighted Average 7,114 89.39% Pervious Area 844 10.61% Impervious Area PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 10-Year Rainfall=4.26" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: TO NORTH/GARRISON Runoff = 0.52 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.029 af, Depth= 3.99" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 990 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 2,776 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 3,766 71 Weighted Average 2,776 73.71% Pervious Area 990 26.29% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 2S: TO EAST/WOODDALE Runoff = 0.32 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.018 af, Depth= 5.56" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 1,116 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 604 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 1,720 85 Weighted Average 604 35.12% Pervious Area 1,116 64.88% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: TO SOUTH/LAKE Runoff = 0.93 cfs @ 12.18 hrs, Volume= 0.051 af, Depth= 3.35" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-48.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Area (sf) CN Description 844 98 Impervious Bldg, Gravel 7,114 61 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG B 7,958 65 Weighted Average 7,114 89.39% Pervious Area 844 10.61% Impervious Area PROP DRNG westin 121418 MSE 24-hr 3 100-Year Rainfall=7.32" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 12/14/2018 HydroCAD® 10.00-22 s/n 10343 © 2018 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.0 Direct Entry, © WSB 2013, City of Edina, H ennepin County, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | ©WSB & Associates 2013 4501 Garris on Lane February 7, 2019 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 125 ft / © WSB 2013, City of Edina, H ennepin County, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | ©WSB & Associates 2013 4501 Garris on Lane February 7, 2019 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 50 ft / Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI.C . To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: R eport and R ecommendation F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:4536 F rance Avenue S ign Varianc e Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the variance as requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he applicant is requested a freestanding sign setback variance for a freestanding sign at 4536 France Avenue. T he proposed sign is setback 13.67 feet from the traveled portion of the street instead of the required 20 feet from the traveled portion of the street. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Applicant Submittal Aerial Map Mailing Notice The applicant is requesting a setback variance for a freestanding sign at 4536 France Avenue South. The property is located on the west side of France Avenue, south of Sunnyside Avenue. The subject property was rezoned from residential to office district in 1976. The proposed sign is located within an existing planting bed approximately 3 feet 7 inches from the property line and approximately 13 feet 8 inches from the curb along France Avenue. The City’s sign code requires freestanding signs to be setback 20 feet from the traveled portion of the street. The size and height of the proposed sign is compliant with the City’s Sign Ordinance. There was a sign in this same location for the previous use on the site (Century 21 Real Estate). Had that original sign not been removed a variance would not be required. (See attached previous sign.) Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential home; zoned R-1 and Neighborhood Commercial. Easterly: Four story residential building, City of Minneapolis Southerly: Single Unit residential home; zoned R-1 and guided Neighborhood Commercial. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 10,000 square foot lot is located on the west side of France Avenue, south of Sunnyside Avenue. The existing building is a single family house converted into office space. Planning Guide Plan designation: Neighborhood Commercial Zoning: POD-1, Planned Office District January 30, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner B-19-2, A 6.33-foot setback variance for a freestanding sign located 13.67 feet from the traveled portion of the street at 4536 France Avenue South Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Compliance Table Sign Standards in POD Proposed Setback – Square footage - Height– 20 feet to the traveled portion of the street 86 square feet between the freestanding sign and the wall sign with no sign being greater than 50 square feet 8 feet 13.67 feet* 8.25 square feet-currently there is no wall signage on the building 7 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues Is the proposed variance justified? Yes, Staff believes the requested setback is justified. The commercial lot on France is narrow, and includes site access off of France Avenue. Some of the parking on site is located between the existing building and France Avenue. If the proposed sign was placed 20 feet from the traveled portion of the street, it would be placed within the existing parking stalls. The proposed sign location doesn’t interfere with any sight lines or the sidewalk along France Avenue. The subject property used to be the location of a Century 21 Real Estate Office. The sign for Century 21 had similar placement to the proposed 8.25 square foot sign. If the existing non- conforming sign was not previously removed it would have been allowed to remain in that location and be refaced. Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances required that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively to grant a variance. The proposed variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. The practical difficulty is that the lot was originally laid out as a single family residential lot. When the property was rezoned in the 70’s and the house was converted for commercial use. To reuse the structure, parking was added in both the front and rear of the property. To meet the required freestanding sign setback the sign would have to be located within the parking stalls in the front yard. STAFF REPORT Page 3 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? It is not common that a former single family residential structure is converted into an office use. The subject property is narrow, and has limited frontage on France Avenue. A sign setback of 20 feet from the traveled portion of the street would have limited visibility and would require the removal of some of the few parking spaces on site. A similar variance was granted for the Gateway Bank at 4530 France Avenue (to the north) in 2016 to locate their freestanding sign 10 feet back from the traveled portion of the road. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No, the proposed variance does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are signs in the general vicinity that have a similar setback. The proposed sign has pedestrian scale and will help with wayfinding. There had been a sign in this same location with the previous use on the site. Staff Recommendation Approve the requested variance to allow the freestanding sign at 4536 France Avenue South to be located 13.67 feet from the traveled portion of the street based on the following findings: 1. The proposed sign complies with zoning standards, with exception of the setback. The previous freestanding sign at this location had a similar setback to the proposed sign. 2. The subject property has limited frontage on France Avenue. A sign setback further from the street would have limited visibility and require the removal of some of the few parking stalls that are available on site. 3. The practical difficulty is caused by the existing site configuration which converted an existing single family home into an office. Relocating the sign to meet the required setback would put the sign in the middle of the existing parking in front of the building. 4. The proposed sign fits the character of the neighborhood. The sign is appropriate in size and scale and will help with wayfinding. 5. A similar variance was granted for Gateway Bank at 4530 France Avenue in 2016. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: • Site plan date stamped January 15, 2019. • Sign plans and elevations date stamped December 20, 2018. Dear Planning We are requesting a variance for set back of a monument for 4536 France Ave South Due to the location of the set back would place the sign out of vision from France Ave. The original set back of 20 feet from the curb would put the sign into their parking with minimal Parking stalls. Tufford‐Hughes have created a beauty full raised area for green space and location for their monument. The new monument is made from the same materials as the raised area and will blend in with the business, landscaping and retaining wall. We are asking for the set back to be 13’ 8” from the curb or 20 feet back from the lane of traffic to match the same set back as a variance granted to Gateway Bank just two doors down. This will not alter the character of the neighborhood Thank you Rick Ballantyne Schad Tracy Signs 1610 Cliff Road East Burnsville, MN. 55337 612‐282‐7655 cell rickb@schadtracy.com 325 MINNESOTA AVE. N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55960 PHONE / 507-367 -2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 Client: 00-00 NA NA NA NA NA NA 00-00 00-00 00-00 00-00 00-00 THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART OF A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXH IBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S AUTHORIZED AGENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Date: Drawing Number: Sales Person: Scale: 3'-7” SETBACK FROM PROPERTY N 13'-8” SETBACK FROM CURB TUFFORD-HUGHES &ASSOCIATES Wi financial success. That's the plan, 4536 - r- 7-0" I _ 2" —4 00 0 THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES FROFOSEI) EXTERIOR SIGNAGE INSTALL NEW MONUMENT SIGN WITH FLOATING FOUNDATION, STONE BASE, CEDAR POST WITH D/F 1" DEEP ALUMINUM FAN SIGN 7'-7" 2'4" 1' 11 3/4" 2'-9" 3,-0" 16" PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEC 2 0 2018 CITY OF EDP,A, *CHESTNUT BLEND VERSA-LOK STONE Drawn by: Austin Odom CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL Li APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED El REVISE AND RESUBMIT Signature Title: Date• THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF schadiracy shins The Sign of Qualitl •!...... 325 MINNESOTA AVE. N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55960 PHONE / 507-367 -2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 These drawings are the exclusive property of Schad Tracy Signs. They represent chargeable time spent. They are submitted for your personal no under the agreement that the use of this design in its entirety or any port will not be reproduced, copied, lent or used for any purpose without written consent from Schad Tracy Signs. Client: Tuffaml-Hitahfle _Edna, MN Date: September 20, 2018 Drawing Number: 102940 - 09-20-201E5 Sales Person: Rick Ballantyne Scale: 3/4" =1'-0" Revisions: DAM DESCRIPIION: 101_00.410 NA F7 00-00 SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT. THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAINING PROVIDED AS PART Of A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION Of SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IIS AUTHORIZED AGENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 0 ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS nec AND SHALL MEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS SIGN MUST BE GROUNDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. SHADING INDICATES OPENING OF PLANTER CONSTRUCTED or TREATED PLYWOOD W/ ICE & WATER SHIELD r RECESSED PUCK LIGHTS Client: luffarcifHuglies FAInsi, MN These drawings are the exclusive property of Schad Tracy Signs. They represent chargeable time spent. They are submitted for your personal use under the agreement that the use of this design in its entirety or any pad will not be THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES FROFOSED EXT ERIOR SIGNAGE INSTALL NEW MONUMENT SIGN WITH FLOATING FOUNDATION, STONE SASE, CEDAR POST WITH D/F 1" DEC' ALUMINUM FAN SIGN THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF schad-tracy signs The Sign of Qualit di LIMESTONE CAP (4)5/1e DIA. GRK-R55 SCREWS FROM EACH SIDE (8) TOTAL SCREWS ADD CRICKET FLASHING AT FACE OF BRICK OVER BRACKET HANGER HUCO610-5175 FASTEN THROUGH FLASHING INTO PSL POST APPLY SELF ADHERING MEMBRANE FLASHING AT LOCATION OF BRACKET HANGER STONE EXTERIOR SUBSTRATE FOR ATTACHING STONE BUILD OUT STRUCTURE 8. PLANTER WITH 2 X 4 PRESSURE TREATED PSL LUMBER Revisions: DAM DESCRIPTION: 13100-00 LNA F100700__NA 00-001 NA 00-00 00-00 A fl 00-00 NA Drawn by: Austin Odom CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL U APPROVED LJ APPROVED AS NOTED 1REVISE AND RESUBMIT Slunature: Thle• Dale SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DIMENSIONS ON THESE onAwiNcs ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT. THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART OF A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT 10 BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S AUTHORIZED AGENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 1.-11 3/4" 5'-6 If 0 qi / CONCRETE FOOTING WITH NESTED #4 REBAR WELDED WIRE MESH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/2" 1.-0" /— PLAN VIEW SCALE! 1/2" 1'-0" (2) 5/1 6" DIA. GRICRSS SCREWS EMBED 2" 1" NOTCH IN WOOD CHANNEL DRILLING FOR SIGN ATTACHMENT bx b CEDARPOST DRILLING IN LIMESTONE FOR RECESSED PUCK LIMESTONE CAP PLANTER CUTOUT 22 X 51" X 18"DP f. ; 326 MINNESOTA AVE. N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOGO, MN 55960 PHONE / 607-367.2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894.2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 SIMPSON ABU662 POST SASE Drawing Number: 12132940 - 09-20-201E5 Sales Person: Kick Ballantyne Scale: 1/2" =1'-0" reproduced, copied, lent or used for any purpose without Date: written consent from Schod Tracy Signs. September 20, 2018 PLANNING DEPARr4S.\17 DEC 2 0 2018 CITY OF ED iftl.d PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS nec AND SHALL MEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS SIGN MUST SE GROUNDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. 8'-1" FOOTING EIN FRONT ELEVATION 1/2" = 1/8" = V-0" re FRONT ELEVATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT' schadlracy signs The Stn of Qualit aiiii THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES 19R0190SED EXTERIOR SIGNAGE INSTALL NEW MONUMENT SIGN WITH FLOATING FOUNDATION, STONE RASE, CEDAR 1705T WITH D/F 1" DEEP ALUMINUM FAN SIGN DEC 2 0 2018 CITY OF EDNA THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF 325 MINNESOTA AVE, N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55960 PHONE / 507-367 -2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 Those drawings are the exclusive property of Schad Tracy Signs. They represent chargeable time spent. They ore submitted for your personal use under the agreement that the use of this design in its entirely or ony part will not be reproduced, copied, lent or used for ony purpose without v,filien consent from Schad Tracy Signs. Client: Tuffnrol-Hughm _Edna, MN Date: September 20, 2018 Drawing Number: R132940 - 09-20-2018 Sales Person: Kick Ballantyne Scale: 1/2" =1'-0" Revisions: DAM DESCRIPTION: SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND D16IENSioNS On THESE DRAWINGS ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT. THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART OF A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S AUTHORIZED AGENTS, All RIGHTS RESERVED, PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. C . . . ) ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS nec AND SHALL MEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS SIGN MUST BE GROUNDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. Drawn by: Austin Odom CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL LI APPROVED LI APPROVED AS NOTED q REVISE AND fiEsUEINTIT Signature: 1111, Date, 00-00 NA NA NA 13 00-00 00-00 13 oo-oo NA TB 1.-0" THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES INSTALL NEW MONUMENT SIGN WITH FLOATING FOUNDATION, STONE BASE, CEDAR POST WITH P/F 1" DEE!' ALUMINUM FAN SIGN PLANNING DEPART? =NT DEC 2 0 2018 CITY OF ED INA FRONT ELEVATION 1/6' V-0" Il FRONT ELEVATION FROPOSED EXTERIOR SIGNAGE THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF schadAracq ,signs The Sign olQuallEj 325 MINNESOTA AVE N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55960 PHONE / 507-367 -2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 There drawings are the exclusive property of Schad Tracy Signs. They represent chargeable time spent. They are submitted for your personal use under the agreement that the use of this design in its entirety or any port will net be reproduced, copied, lent ar used for any purpose without written consent from Schad TracySigns. Client: idford,±tughao _Edina, MN Date: September 20, 2018 Drawing Number: RI32940 - 09-20-2018 Sales Person: Rick Ballantyne Scale: 1/2" =1'-0" SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES TART ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS ARE UNOERSTOOD AND CORRECT, THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART Of A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S AUTHORIZED AGENTS. All RIGHTS RESERVED, PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 0 ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS neC AND SHALL MEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS SIGN MUST BE GROUNDED III COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CONE. Revisions: DATE, DESCRIPTION: fl o-90___N_A_ Eto_o_-_0_0 NA Drawn by: Austin Odom CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL q APPROVED , APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE AND RESUBMIT Signature• Title• Date• THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF schadiracy signs The Sign of Qua1 .%*`•......j 325 MINNESOTA AVE. N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55960 PHONE / 507-367 -2631 FAX / 507-387-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 These droxvings are the exclusive properly of Schad Tracy Signs, They represent chargeable time spent. They are submitted for your personal use under the agreement Mal lhe use of this design in its entirety or any pad will not be reproduced, copied, lent or used for any purpose without uilten consent horn Schad Tracy Signs. Client: Safford-Hughee___ Fdln~, MN Date: September 20, 2018 Drawing Number: R132940 - 09-20-2018 Sales Person: Rick Ballantyne Scale: 275:1 (1 =275") Revisions: Dm: DESCRIPTION: Et00-.0.0 NA_ _ n00AD NA 00-00 NA 00-00 NA 00 00 A 00-00 THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES FROFOSED SIGNAGE LOCATION 20' SETBACK FROM LANE OF TRAFFIC AND FROM CURD PLANNING DPAR-t DEC 2 0 2f118 CITY OF coup. Drawn by: Austin Odom SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DISIENSIONS 011THESE ORAWINOS ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT. PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. ELECTRICAL TO USE LI APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE AND RESUBMIT Signature• OF A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED W11110111 THE WRITTEN U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS 10 AND SHALL MEET ALL N.E.C. STANDARDS nec Title• PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S SIGN MUST RE GROUNDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE GOD OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. Date AUTHORIZED AGENTS, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, THE COLORS SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL COLORS - THE ELEVATION SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY NOT BE A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF ACTUAL SIZES EXISTING SIGNAGE SETIMCK GATEWAY BANK'S SIGN AT 4530 FRANCE AVENUE S WAS INSTALLED IN 2017 WITH A 20 FOOT SETBACK FROM THE LANE OF TRAFFIC AS SHOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEC 2 0 2018 CITY OF ED;NA =". THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF schadAraai signs The Sign of Qualit e 325 MINNESOTA AVE. N. P.O. BOX 357 ORONOCO, MN 55980 PHONE / 507.367.2631 FAX / 507-367-2633 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BURNSVILLE, MN 55337 PHONE / 952-894-2421 FAX / 952-894-2748 Thsse drawings ore the exclusive property of Schad Tracy Signs. They represent chargeable Once spent. They are submitted for your personal use under the agreement that the use of this design in as entirely or any port will not be reproduced, copied, lent or used for any purpose without written consent horn Schod Tracy Signs. Client: Hugheti Fdlnia, MN Date: September 20, 2018 Drawing Number: R52940 - 09-20-2018 Sales Person: I Rick Ballantyne Scale: 1/4"=T-0" ROWS forts: DATE, DESCRIPTION: Ita0-0_01 NA El_00,00 NA 13 00-00 NA 00-0 SIGNATURE ABOVE ACKNOWLEDGES THAT ALL SPECIFICATIONS AND DIMENSIONS DOME DRAWINGS ARE UNDERSTOOD AND CORRECT. THIS IS AN ORIGINAL DRAWING PROVIDED AS PART OF A PLANNED PROJECT AND IS NOT TO BE EXHIBITED COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF SCHAD TRACY SIGNS OR IT S AUTHORIZED AGENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRIMARY ELECTRICAL POWER TO SIGN TO BE BY OTHERS. ALL POWER TO BE 120 VOLT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. 0 ELECTRICAL TO USE U.L. LISTED COMPONENTS AND SHALL MEET ALL nec N.E.C. STANDARDS SIGN MUST BE GROUNDED IN COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE, Drawn by: AuetIn Odom CLIENT/LANDLORD APPROVAL LI APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED .7T REVISE AND RESUBMIT Signature. We: Date. City of Edina, H ennepin County, Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB &Associates 2013, © WSB & Associates 2013 4536 France Avenue January 24, 2019 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 50 ft / MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION ____________________________________________________ CASE FILE: B-19-2 TO: Properties within 200-Feet APPLICANT: Rick Ballantyne, Shad-Tracy Signs PROPERTY ADDRESS: 4536 France Avenue South LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Mark Nelson 1st Addn, Hennepin County, Minnesota PURPOSE: A 6.33 foot setback variance for a freestanding monument sign located 13.67 feet from the traveled portion of the street DATE OF HEARING: Wednesday, January 30, 2019 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P.M. PLACE OF HEARING: Council Chambers Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: *Attend the hearing and give testimony, *Fill out correspondence form on the City’s website https://edinadocs.edinamn.gov/Forms/contact FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact the City Hall Planning Department at (952) 826-0369 or 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 DATE OF NOTICE: January 18, 2019 Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:S ketch P lan R eview - 7079 Amundson Avenue Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No Action requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: P rovided non-binding comments on a future potential development project. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Memo Date: F ebruary 13, 2019 Agenda Item #: VI I I.B. To:P lanning C ommission Item Type: O ther F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:C omprehens ive P lan Update Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No Action requested I N TR O D U C TI O N: P lanning C ommission members to provide a status update.